Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Committees - Public Works/Planning - 09/12/1994PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE SEPTEMBER 12, 1994 PRESENT: Jim Bennett Roger Lubovich Tim Clark Gary Gill Don Wickstrom Mr & Mrs Rust ABSENT: Paul Mann James Street Pedestrian Bridge Wickstrom said that since the last committee meeting when this item was discussed, we have essentially we moved the location of the pedestrian bridge design further up James between Prospect and Lenora and the ramps have been shortened however even with that, we are still looking at an estimated cost of $525,000. Wickstrom noted that if Council wanted to pursue this, we would have to determine how to fund it. He said the reason it is so expensive is, it's like a road construction bridge; the load is very similar. Clark feels we should do something because of the danger in trying to cross James. Wickstrom pointed out that the question really is "will it be utilized"? He said that perhaps we should do some pedestrian counts in the area. He said the only physical convenience is that it does split the distance between 94th and Central. Bennett recommended that staff proceed with a pedestrian count. Charge in Lieu of Assessment for Sewer Service - Meadow Ridge ElepMentary #26 Area Wickstrom explained that when the new school was built on 100th Avenue, sewer was to come in from 264th by way of a new trunk line. He said the trunk line included the use of an inverted siphon through the canyon area but the analysis, showed that the inverted siphon would not work due to an inadequate upstream service area. He said the bigger issue was that the 277th corridor is to tie into 274th; we don't know if we will be cutting the road down and bridging 108th which in that case, the sewer would work, or will we be on grade. He explained that the higher we go with the Green River Bridge, the less cutting and the greater the probability of coming in on grade but, the higher we go with that bridge the greater the cost for the bridge. He said we still have to balance the least cost option out. Wickstrom further stated that was a big issue so it was thought best that if they used the system that services the Tudor Square area, than they could readily extend it and would resolve any further conflicts with our corridor project. He said however, it does have a capacity problem. To take this additional area requires that eventually a portion of that trunk line be upsized. He said if we want these properties to connect in the interim period, they should be paying their share of that upsizing cost which is about $324,000; this is about 107 acres. Dividing that, this comes out to about $3,000 per acre. Wickstrom said we have done this on other areas where we have had sewers that did not have capacity to service them and by instituting a charge, we allowed development to continue. In that case, we eventually went in and rebuilt the main and paid for it from sewer revenue. Wickstrom said that essentially, this is the same type of situation. He further noted that the School District has already contributed their payment. Wickstrom said that right now there is no sewer to the bulk of the area; residents who do front on the existing sewer but their property lies within this expanded area, would not be allowed to connect because the system is not sized to service them. He said the option is that we will allow them to connect if they pay the fee which than goes into the fund to rebuild that system. The other option is to have the City pay for it but the City's general City sewer customers are paying for something that benefits a specific few. In response to Bennett, Wickstrom said that the $3,000 per acre equates to about $750 for a normal size lot. Wickstrom noted that connecting to the sewer is a property owner option unless they are on a failed septic system or some other health issue. Committee unanimously recommended authorizing implementing the charge in lieu of assessment including establishing a separate fund therefor. Segregation of Assessment #45 - LID #327 Wickstrom explained that this was the LID which improved West Valley Highway in front of Van Doren's Landing and they want to segregate it into two parcels. Committee unanimously recommended Council adopt a resolution for segregation of Assessment #45 in LID 327. Segregation of Assessment #7 - LID #330 Wickstrom said that this LID was for 64th Avenue in front of Van Doren's Landing and they want to segregate the assessments into two parcels. Committee unanimously recommended Council adopt a resolution for segregation of Assessment #7 in LID #330. 236th Place (Added Item) Clark stated that the residents on 236th Place at approximately 105th were very upset about the traffic speed coming down 236th. He said that the residents had two points; one being, the original plan for the apartment complex on 108th did not call for egress coming out onto 108th and that all the apartment traffic was to be shifted down towards 240th. He further said that the residents, last year, complained about the amount of traffic and even questioned whether they could get speed bumps installed and that the City had allowed them to monitor the traffic with a radar gun. Clark said we have not initiated the traffic light at 108th & 240th yet and the residents feel that when we do, we have created another problem with drivers shortcutting that light by driving south on Benson, taking a left on 236th and down 108th. Wickstrom said that traffic staff will review this. Russell Road & Meeker Street (Added Item) Bennett asked how we could develop the process of installing a traffic light at Russell and Meeker. Wickstrom said that next year when we put the road capital improvement budget together, we will look into it. Sewer Vac Truck (Added Item Bennett asked about the possibility of entering into some kind of inter -local agreement with other jurisdictions on the use of the sewer vac truck. He said that this is a costly piece of equipment and for the purposes of getting revenue back from that, it would then be less costly for us to use. Wickstrom said he will look into it. Meeting adjourned 5:00 p.m.