HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Committees - Public Works/Planning - 11/04/1992 _ 6�1
r,
CITY OF KENT
-PUBLIC WORKS COM1 UITEE
NOVEMBER 4, 1992
PRESENT: Jim White Tony McCarthy
Jim Bennett Tim LaPorte
Paul Mann John Bond
Don Wickstrom Laurie Evezich
Gary Gill Mr. & Mrs. Walter Susanj
Ed White Mr. & Mrs. Rust
Kevin Lindell Andy Gomes
Paul Scott Charlie Kiefer
Tim Heydon
Request for Pedestrian Crossing
Wickstrom noted that this item had been carried over from the
previous Public Works meeting. Andy Gomes, Manager of Farrington
Court, _ addressed concerns regarding the safety of the Farrington
Court residents crossing Titus St. at Reiten Rd. Ed referred to a
report prepared by staff which summarizes the actions that staff
has taken in the last two weeks to take traffic counts and perform
visual surveys. Ed stated although there isn't an accident history
there, this is a heavily travelled roadway of approximately 21, 000
vehicles per day, with an average speed of 30 - 39 MPH. Ed stated
that it is staffs recommendation that the residents of Farrington
Court use the signal, which is approximately 300-400 feet north at
Canyon Drive. However, Mr. Gomes commented that he feels an extra
300-400 foot walk for a person 80+ years in age. is quite a bit.
Jim White commented on the difficulty of turning .lift or right from
Reiten Rd. , however he stated is not willing to go for a traffic
signal at this time. Jim White and Jim .Bennett felt that to ask
senior citizens to go from Farrington Court to the signal at Canyon
Dr. , is unrealistic. Paul Mann stated that the cost of a $56, 000
traffic signal is worth the expense. He further stated that the
activated signal would reinforce the legality of an individual
crossing the street. He feels we need to slow down traffic in
Kent. A brief discussion followed regarding the time-frame for
installing a traffic signal. Don stated that there are 60 projects
staff is managing totalling $80 Million Dollars and that stretches
everyone pretty thin.
At this point, Jim White suggested that the Committee meet at
Reiten & Titus with the Traffic Engineers and Mr. Gomes to review
the situation first-hand before taking final action and to bring
this issue back to the next Committee meeting.
1
94th & James Street Safety Problem (Mr. & Mrs. Walter Susanj)
Mr. Susanj presented the Committee with photographs of previous
vehicular accidents wherein their property was damaged. Mr. Susanj
expressed concern for the school children walking in the area as
well as concerns for his property.
Ed White had talked to Mr. Susanj and explained to him about the
James St. Safety Project. Ed explained that staff will be talking
with the neighbors in that area hopefully in the next few months.
Staff is in the process of setting up two meetings - one with the
Church which addresses the access issues off of -James, Alvord and
Hazel Streets. Another meeting will be set with the neighbors to
outline whatever concerns they have regarding James Street. The
Church meeting then would be a "kick off" for the neighbors to set
a forum for their meeting on other concerns. Ed explained there
are several issues relating to the safety of James Street.
Ed stated that the best resolution at this point would be if Mr &
Mrs. Susanj could work with staff along with the other residents,
in identifying their concerns. Staff will work as diligently as
possible in trying to resolve these problems.
Jim White requested Ed to specifically take a look at the 94th &
James intersection (Mr. Susanj 's property) and bring back
suggestions for solutions at the next Committee meeting. There was
discussion regarding installation of a guardrail - Ed explained the
pros and cons on this. There will be further discussion at the
next Committee meeting.
Equipment Rental
Tony McCarthy opened discussion referring to the Draft Policy on
the use of City Vehicles. Regarding that portion of the Policy on
vehicles going home, Tim Heydon had prepared a list showing all of
the City vehicles by description, use, and primary drivers, taken
home and the reasons why taken home and that those vehicles are
strictly light trucks and cars. Tony stated that this list will be
inserted in the budget documents on an annual basis.
Tony noted he had informed the Park Director that his vehicle is
one that cannot go home. Tony referenced the motorcycles listed
and stated there had been a meeting with the Chief of Police and
Personnel and it has been decided that those vehicles can go home.
Per Tony, the theory is that the motorcycles are considered
personal equipment. The motorcycles are assigned to individual
officers - they are not traded off where several people would drive
the same motorcycle. For safety reasons and certain amount of
call-back, those vehicles are going home.
Tim explained there are fire, police and signal people taking
vehicles home. The departments that have made changes as a result
2
of the new policy, are the Fire Dept. , reducing almost half and
Public Works, reducing half the number of cars going home, with
trade offs. Tim stated that back up will be less in those two
departments on emergency situations, however there is a cost factor
to consider.
The "action" portion of this issue is on the list of surplus
vehicles. Tony explained that in 193 budget shows a replacement of
8 pieces of equipment, and Tim has actually deferred from 193 to
194 another list of equipment. He stated that this is part of the
program to reduce the budget charges thru all the departments by
20% and by deferring these vehicles allowing another-year of life
out of the vehicles. Tony explained there is a fund with
approximately $2 Million which pays for these vehicles. Tim stated
however, that in 194 they will need to be replaced. Tony stated
that there were some vehicles that had been put on "hold" at the
shops and those vehicles will be put back in service.
Tim explained that the City has a fleet of approximately 205
assigned vehicles and 58 vehicles in a pool. ;Of that total, 20
vehicles/equipment were to be cut. Of these, there are
approximately 124 cars and trucks assigned; approximately 94 of
those are in the General Fund and 70% of those 94 are Police and
Fire.
Included in Tim's presentation he briefly discussed the problems
with the Toro lawnmowers. Jim White stated that before more mowers
are purchased, the entire golf course issue needs to be addressed.
Discussion followed regarding the sander as a piece of equipment to
be surplused. Paul Mann stated he felt the sander should not be
included and in light of that, 19 pieces of equipment should be
surplused rather than 20.
At this time, Jim Bennett stated that he does not see this
equipment rental issue as a short term thing and to get accustomed
to doing more with less.
Committee unanimously agreed to authorize Equipment Rental to
surplus the vehicles which have been replaced and are no longer
needed by the City.
LID 336 - East Valley Highway
Wickstrom stated that this is a matter of accepting the contract as
complete. Gary Merlino was contractor on the reconstruction of
East Valley Highway. Committee unanimously agreed to accept LID
336 East Valley Highway improvements as complete.
3
Metro Sewer Rate Increase
Wickstrom explained that Metro has a rate increase due to the
Federal Water Quality requirements having to do with secondary
treatments on all of Metro's facilities. In conjunction with this,
last year the City authorized signing a contract which changed the
equivalent unit, which is the basis for their rate. originally
Metro had based their rate on a 900 cu.ft./month charge. Wickstrom
stated that subsequent studies have been made and now, apparently
thru conservation, the sewage generation has dropped to 750 cu.ft.
As such, the contracts have all been amended to reflect that
change. The study also shows that over the years,- the single
family residences have been subsidizing the industrial/commercial
complex. The result is that because our single families are on a
fixed monthly charge, and our industrial/commercial accounts are on
a cubic foot charge, with this change in the rate base, the costs
to the commercial accounts will raise while that to the residential
accounts will go down. This rate change represents an approximate
15% - 18% increase to our commercial accounts and a 3% reduction to
our single family accounts. However, it is equitable.
Wickstrom further stated that after looking at our portion of the
rate, it was adjusted because with an increase in the total number
of service units (rate base) , collecting at same old rate would
result in increased revenue. As such, to keep it revenue neutral,
it needs to adjust. Wickstrom explained that we need to pay the
Metro bill beginning January 1st; we need about an $800,000
increase over 193. As such, we had to pass it on thru in a fair an
equitable manner, the same as we would normally do. This year we
had to incorporate the rate base change, which resulted in the
industries picking up the burden.
Jim Bennett stated that the customers who will be affected by this
increase, should be notified.
Committee unanimously approved the rate increase and forward to
City Council for their endorsement and approval.
King County Solid Waste Management Update
Wickstrom explained that the County has updated our Solid Waste
Plan and that King County wishes to make a presentation to the
Committee. Wickstrom noted that the basic change is our being
mandated to do different types of recycling. Wickstrom stated that
we need to respond back to King County by November 30th.
Committee agreed to have a 20 minute presentation made by King
County at the next Committee meeting. Wickstrom will coordinate.
4
r
LID 333 - LID 338 - LID 339
Wickstrom explained these LID's are construction complete and we
would like to finalize these projects. Tentative dates have been
scheduled to set these items for public hearings.
Committee unanimously agreed to set public hearing dates on LIDS
333, 338, and 339.
Property Accruisition
Wickstrom explained that the City has been negotiating with Mrs.
Ramstead, one of the major property owners on the 271th Corridor.
Wickstrom stated that we have an earnest money agreement for
$700,000. This is in accordance with the appraisal. The property
in question is approximately 96 acres. Wickstrom stated that Mrs.
Ramstead has a logging permit and the city's concern is, once Mrs.
Ramstead clear cuts her property, King County can, under State law,
and will issue a moratorium on the entire site for 6 years; which
would eliminate any building permits or additions of any kind
including us. Wickstrom explained that this is far beyond what we
would want and that is what initiated this negotiation with her.
Wickstrom further explained that a school is going in adjacent to
the property which will bring in sewer and water to the property. '
This could very well increase the price and could make the property
more potentially developable.
Jim Bennett raised the question regarding what phase we are in
regarding the 277th Corridor. He noted that approximately $500,000
was authorized to do study, survey, etc. Bennett asked how this
acquisition would impact that.
Wickstrom explained that we may become "landlords" on this property
but when the school is built in 194 the property could probably be
sold for a profit. He further stated that this is also the reason
why negotiations are under way with another property owner, Mrs.
Johnson, at the bottom of the hill. Mrs. Johnson is very willing
to sell and an appraisal will be in to the City on November 6th.
Wickstrom explained that there is money in the ,project fund; $2
Million in outstanding bonds on this project; $800, 000 in cash that
was set aside some time ago for and $500,000 development fees that
have been prepaid by various developments.
Committee unanimously agreed to authorize acquisition of the
Ramstead property.
Proposed LID Smith Street Sidewalk
Wickstrom explained that this was brought forward from the last
Committee meeting because of a 1-1 split vote.
5
.K
3
Wickstrom stated that we did not receive much response in favor of
the LID, although we have adequate LID commitments to proceed with
the project.
Wickstrom also stated that the City could possibly contribute some
funds to the project. There is some sidewalk funding available.
Committee unanimously agreed to authorize staff to proceed with the
Smith Street Sidewalk LID with a suggestion of "sweetening the
pot", on this sidewalk project, per staff recommendation.
1993 Engineering Division Work Program
Wickstrom suggested that the Committee review the program (material
handed out to Committee) and come back with suggestions. Wickstrom
stated that staff is managing 60• projects for a total of $80
Million. He asked that the Committee come back with suggestions
since we are requesting additional staff to be financed thru the
Street Utility and Drainage Utility.
Wickstrom explained that one unknown factor is that we have
submitted for a number of grants that are not shown in the program.
He stated that UAB has $40 Million of funds available for street
projects also noting that there is Federal money presently
available and another $20 Million in the three County region to be
distributed for road type projects.
Committee will review the material and discuss at the next Public
Works meeting.
At this time, Jim White did make note of the fact that staff is
doing a great job. He expressed his appreciation to Ed White for
everything done and. the expediency with how things are addressed.
Sewer Connection Ordinance
Wickstrom stated that this item had been referred back to Committee
from Council due to a pending lawsuit and requested that this item
be put back on the Council agenda.
Committee unanimously agreed to place the Sewer Connection
Ordinance back on the Council agenda.
6