Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Committees - Parks and Human Services - 03/20/1991 1, Marie I 4 - City CW i Parks Committee manures March 20, 1991 Councilmembers Present: Steve Dowell, Chair; Jon Johnson and Jim White. Staff Present: Ed Chow, Barney Wilson, Tony McCarthy, Tom Brubaker, Ken Chatwin, Carol Morris, Helen Wickstrom, Jack Ball, Lea Britting, Karen Ford, Robyn Bartelt, Lee Anderson, Patrice Thorell, Cheryl Fraser, Alice Neiffer and Pam Rumer. Others Present: Colie Hough, Hough Beck and Baird; John Miller; Joy Miller; Steven Coutcher, Gravity Sports; Lance Goodwin, Bubble Records and Skates; Tom Sexton; Bryan Costanich; John Mullen; Rob Staples; Lyle Price, Valley Daily News. SCENIC HILL PARK - MASTER PLAN AND IAC RESOLUTIQN FOR FUNDING Helen Wickstrom introduced Colie Hough of Hough Beck and Baird, who explained that her task was to design the parking stalls to benefit and function for the park as well as the school. Improvements in the parking lot include an entrance off of Woodland Way, sidewalks, striping, paving, lighting for security, and a detention holding system. Hough announced that the school district has committed to approximately $100,000 in improvements and has turned over control of the design to Hough Beck and Baird. Hough explained that she is proposing a curvilinear design due to a very valuable growth of trees. Hough referred to the proposed master plan to show that there will be a play area, tennis court, and picnic shelter with a restroom on one side of the parking lot. In another area there will be natural vegetation with a trail system and more picnic tables scattered throughout. White asked how many and what kind of trees are being removed. Hough responded that there is a mixture of fir and evergreen, and these are not the largest on site. She said that she tried to save the most valuable. In response to Dowell's question, Wickstrom said that the master plan has been shown at the schools and it did receive the school district's approval. White expressed his concern about the neighborhood's reaction to the plan. Wickstrom suggested that staff could hold a neighborhood meeting. White commented that he felt this would satisfy the neighborhood's "need to know. " Parks Committee Minutes March 20, 1991 Page Two Wickstrom agreed to postpone the adoption of the master plan until after the public meeting is held. She requested the adoption of resolutions authorizing staff to proceed with application to the Interagency Committee for Outdoor Recreation for funding for Scenic Hill Park and Riverview Park. Johnson moved to authorize staff to proceed with the grant applications. White seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. Both Dowell and Johnson clarified for Wickstrom that Johnson's motion also included authorization for the Parks Department to enter into a cooperative agreement with the school district. SICATEROARD BACILITX DISCUS§10 Wilson said that there is a lot of interest in a skateboard facility and introduced members of the audience who were present for the skateboard discussion. He explained that the purpose of the discussion was to get more information and more input from the public. Steve Dowell said that Councilman Mann is working on a skateboarding ordinance which sets out areas in which. skateboarding is prohibited. He said that the safety of those ,involved is the first priority and liability is second. Wilson asked if a facility would be successful in ]Cent if it were not under cover. Steven Coutcher named two such facilities in Vancouver, B.C. and in Cannon Beach which are successful. Coutcher provided photos of the facility in Cannon Beach. Wilson also asked if a private facility would be successful. Tom Sexton answered that liability insurance is not available for private enterprise. Other problems are: having to rent property, the zoning requirements to build a warehouse, and private enterprise competition would not really serve public Anterest. Dowell was concerned with injuries associated with skateboarding. Sexton reported that the degree of injuries is the same as with golf and less risky that those associated with bas;eb4ll, football and basketball. In response to Dowell's question, Sexton explained that skateboard facilities can't get insurance because skateboarding is a new sport which has only become popular in the past ten years. 0 Parks Committee Minutes March 20, 1991 Page Three Dowell expressed his concern that if the City has a skateboard facility, we will be promoting skateboarding in other areas. Ken Chatwin from Personnel distributed a memo from W.C.I.A. (attached) , listing the W.C.I.A. 's guidelines for a skateboard park. He explained that the way the W.C.I.A. is set up, if the City has a big loss, other cities will also be affected/impacted. Chatwin reported that the W.C.I.A. would prefer to see skateboarding as a sanctioned, event-type activity, , rather than as a park. He said that W.C.I.A. is not promoting the idea, but suggested that the City could secure coverage elsewhere. Chatwin named several reasons why it is difficult for skateboard facilities to get insurance coverage: lack of facilities, element of the unknown, and insurance carriers do not, see the sport as attractive, so they try to discourage it by pricing it out of the market. Tom Brubaker reported that there is a Washington statute that protects public landowners who run or own recreational facilities without charging a fee. It states that they shall not be liable for unintentional injuries to users. Brubaker also mentioned an exclusion: landowners who have known dangerous artificial latent conditions on the property. Brubaker added that he could think of one condition that would be the focus of any claim against the City, and that is design. In response to White's question, Sexton said that 'there are no design standards set up by the Washington Skateboarding Association. Wilson asked if the Council is interested in having staff work with Personnel, Law and experienced skateboarders to pursue this issue. He stated he would like to use these resources to prepare a better presentation for the committee. Dowell asked if Mann's ordinance prohibited skateboarding in specific posted areas, would the City be responsibie ''if someone is injured in an area that is not posted. Brubaker: answered that there would be no strong argument. He said that it. the Council is interested, he would like to do additional research with other Washington cities who are under the same statute. Parks Committee Minutes March 20, 1991 Page Four Bryan Costanich asked what sites the City is considering for a possible skateboard park. Wilson answered that for an outside site, he has considered the property north of Uplands Playfield and east of the Metro Park and Ride Lot. The. City leases that property from the railroad. Joy Miller commented that as a parent, she would like to encourage a safe place to spate with safety equipment being required. Her son was seriously injured while skateboarding in the street. Barbara Warne said that there is a real need for a place for kids to go. She has put in asphalt and some ramps in her back yard. She said that 1,000 kids have visited her facility over time and she sees 30-50 kids a day. The Parks Committee directed staff to continue looking at the issue and to put together a package. Wilson announced that if anyone wants to be involved in the process, they should register with Pam Rumer. Those who registered are: *Tom Sexton Barbara Wa=e 3108 58th Avenue NE 17626 SE Lake Moneysmith Tacoma, WA 99422 Auburn, WA '98002 (H) 927-9107 833-1018 (W) 833-2700 Steve Coutcher John Mullen 126 Rainier Ave. S 854-6234 Renton, WA ;98055 (W) 255-1874 Lance Goodwin Bubble Records and Skates 10451 SE 240th Kent, WA 98031 854-7788 CULTURAL ARTS PERTORXINQ ARC¢ CENTER AND CULTURAL_ & lN Patrice Thorell reported that the Council passed the contract with ArtSoft Management .Services at Tuesday night's Council meeting. She announced that there will be upcoming meetings for public input. a Parks Committee Minutes March 20, 1991 Page Five Thorell explained that the hotel/motel cultural taX fund dollars issue is a big issue with the state legislature now. ' She announced that there is a bill in the House which will go on to , the Senate. The bill would allocate 2% of hotel/motel monies in Ding County for cultural facilities. GOLF COURSE UPDATE Wilson discussed the financial situation at the gold' complex. He referred to overheads (attached) to show that things are going well at Riverbend. He reported that the par 3 is up 6.5%-; the mini putt is up 16% and the actual income is up 122%. In conclusion, Wilson reported that the complex is +h$85,O00 where it would have been with the concessionaire. GOLF CARTS Wilson requested permission for the golf course, to purchase additional golf carts rather than lease them, as was the original request. Wilson said that the attorney s office had a problem with the lease and recommended that the City purchase the carts rather than lease them. McCarthy explained that Council granted permission to lease the carts before the attorneys' office reviewed the lease. The IBC now recommends purchasing the carts. McCarthy said that�the issue will go to the Operations Committee next week. In response to Dowell's question, McCarthy said th4t the interest rate in the lease is 10%, and with the line of credit that the golf course has with the City, the City would charge 6.9% interest rate, the same as the state pool rate. McCarthy explained that financially the golf course is reducing its line of credit at a pretty good pace. He recommended that the City spend the additional $40,000 and purchase the lease. White moved to authorize the golf course to pease the golf carts. Johnson seconded the motion. The 'motion passed unanimously. McCarthy announced that he will take the issue to the Operations Committee. Parks Committee Minutes March 20, 1991 Page Six WARNER GROUP RECOMMENDATION Wilson said that the survey has been released and that department staff are studying it. He presented a letter received from concerned citizens regarding proposed changes to me made in the Parks Department. White moved to have copies of the letter forwarded on to full Council. Johnson seconded the motion. The gs`motion passed unanimously. SCENIC SILL PARR P . Wickstrom requested that staff be authorized to take the master plan directly to full Council for appproval if the pommunity makes minor or no changes to it. The Parks Committee instructed staff to take the master plan directly to full Council if minor or no changes are made by the community. RIVERBEND FEATURED Wilson mentioned that Riverbend Golf Course was faatured in this year's publication of Golfing in Washington and alsp as "Course of the Month" in Northwest Golf. DATE CHANGE IN PARKS COMMITTEE MEETINGS Wilson requested that the committee consider changing the meeting to a day that will better line up with City Council meetings. Johnson suggested meeting at an earlier time on the. same day as Operations Committee meetings. White requested that the date not be changed to an off week, but rather the same Week as Council meetings. It was decided that the next Parks Committee meetJAglwill be held on Tuesday, April 23 at 3:45 p.m. SENIOR C FLOOR Lea Britting said staff feels that additional, consulting is necessary from the engineering firm to determine the source of the problem with the Senior Center kitchen floor. s, s Parks Committee Mihutes " March 20, 1991 Page Seven ' Brubaker said that he sent a letter to the contractor and the architect regarding the problems with the Senios 'Center floor. Both immediately responded with letters of non liak lity. Brubaker reported that unfortunately, information,re0eived from the consultant was not conclusive as to the Source of the problem. Brubaker recommend0d that the City spend 'an additional. $3,000 for more thorough consulting, which will involve remgvi�g 0 section of the floor, to determine what is happening underneath the building. Once liability is determined, Brubaker said that theiCity can go after the appropriate party, and if that doesn't Vork, the City will have to enter' into arbitration. White moved to authorize staff to spend an additional $3,000 to pay for additional consulting. Johnson seconded the', motion. The motion passed unanimously. PARRS ORDINANCE The Committee delayed discussion of the Land Ded1c4ktJ9n Ordinance until the next Parks Committee meeting. REQUEST TO W RIBMS Wilson explained that he received a request from Mr... m Cordova to tie yellow ribbons in support of the troops frcrA Bowen Scarff Ford/Volvo to the new bridge on Central Avenue. Brubaker stated that in light, of the resolution thelCi;ty passed in support of the troops during the conflict, with no';comment on the policy behind it, the attorneys' office feels there i''s no problem with tying yellow ribbons in support of the troops. The meeting adjourned at 5:30 p.m. t PARRS COMMITTEE MEETING Mash 20, 1991 Attendance Name dress/Dewar ent Phone No, 1. �. mou 04©�ae�- AJ '.f/l 3. 4. 6. CA-VLr 4&A 114 S 7 8. �A 2c�N �o2a PA-ees, 9. 2? l_fi 10 11. 12 � 13. I 'Z.-1 l-'7 ae--.Co, 14 140 CZ G�AW I'l) 15. " - 16. 17. 6 7. l 18. 19. IPoJ 5-1�10�tfc I 20. 21. err 22. 23 . s June 27 lg r To: Councilmetbers oo\) JUL * From: Len Chapman a4iP, Wei Subject: Skateboard Facilities Many cities have looked into the feasibility of offering skateboard parks, however, very few have followed through with the actual construction or operation of such' a facility. In researching municipally-operated skateboard facilities, I found the biggest concerns to be that, of liability, maintenance, and supervision. We could only find two facilities in the area that are being operated by municipalities. The City of Fircrest has operated a facility since last s9immer. The City of Olympia off red weekend events last summer and this year opened a skateboard g! facility in cooperation with the school district and Boy Scones of America. Both cities began operating skateboard f'actli'ties because their City Councils passed ordinances restri4ting skateboarding in certain areas of their city. Bainbridge Island offered a skateboard park for save; l years and closed it last summeit because of declining users. They; stated that the only people using the park were those cumin .in from outside the area. The cost of maintaining the facility could not be justified because it was not providing a service to residents. Another type of skateboard activity took place last summer when King County Parks cotsponsored -a skateboard competition with the National Skateboard Association. The weekend event +aqk place on County park property and the N.S.A. supplied supervisory staff, judges, and equipment. The* N.S.A. set up the skateboard ramp in an area approved by King County Parks. This was a *0*4time activity and is not being planned this year. The concensus seem to be that offering a skateboard ta0ility does not eliminate skateboarders skating on sidewalks, in;v Teets, and other locations which a facility was intended to cne�al. Skateboards are the form of transportation used onr 'ets and sidewalks and will continue to be used on private atublic property even if a fjacility is offered. The City of Auburn's insurance carrier, Washington Mt*es Insurance Authority, was contacted regarding their position on skateboard facilities and activities. They strongli discouraged the development of skateboard facilities which incl*le; permanent *-Councilmembers June 27, 1990 Page 2 , ramps and other skateboard obstacles. However,, ' - $o offer an alternative to a permanent skateboard facility« =".� ` r The alternative suggests that an outside entity SUO the Boy Scouts of America or National Skateboard Associstio- sponsor and conduct skateboarding events very similar to the,",K 1;g'� County scenario. These one-day events can be held on Cit�r� �►xoperty, however, the insurance coverage would be that of tbo sponsor. The equipment used for the event would be owna, lan4l, maintained by the sponsor; it would be portable in nature and revSd from the site after the event is over. Supervision would, co#eIfrom the sponsoring organization. Last summer, with WrC.I.A. concurrence, the City,°lgWe! permission for the Boy Scouts of America to conduct a one-clay. -ico*petition at Les Gove Park. The, Boy Scouts of America provided.jtho insurance, equipment and supervision as suggested by our insuraance company. The event was very successful. Because this is tho� type of skateboard activity; approved by W.C.I.A. , we will, c ontact the Boy Scouts of America and invited them to provide a S&*: l*r event in Auburn this year. We would recommend against pursuing permanent skat oard facilities for Auburn because of our insurance com ny•s ( position. Attached is a letter which W.C.I.A. a en' - Atka another member city. The letter substantiates the aforentiioned position and alternatives of the W.C.I.A. We will-"4*3 deavor to work with the B.S.A. in providing a special skatebard event. If you would like farther information regarding skateboard facilities or have any questions regarding this ma#ter, please do not hesitate to contact me. LCC:pw ; Attachment cc: Park Board I- W.C.I.A. C i WAS IINGTON CITIES N 'm' C S - . "t 1 AUTHORIT' TMe'. s�TEBO�,Rnixa Ez��,oR$e ern ��,4 .,,,, � fieT ZXPOSOREB Lack of compliance with recognized industry standards established by the International Skateboard Association Poor planning and designing of skateboarding facilities (Product Liability Issue/Architect and enolneer , exposure) Lack of inspection and maintenance of facil,ft#os Lack of inspection of participants personal protective equipment' Negligence in supervision of participants Negligence in•instruction and education of ;jp,%Vtioipants Inadequately trained staff 1 Lack of certification of staff for first aid and c.p.r. Improperly designed spectators area CONTROLS ❑ S - 133.) Design skateboard park according to tb* text available standards (International Skateboard Assoobiition) ❑2) Test ramps through qualified professions, prycaters and safety experts for degree of difficulty [13) Locate spectator areas at a safe distartoo away from the skaters 134) Provide protective netting or barrier at'agnd skateboard run to help impede flying boards or falXs t35) Locate Valkwaye at a safe distance from I.oXaters, providing safe and easy access ❑6) Bark rums with signs or color for degr ipf difficulty (37) Provide easy accessibility for ambUIOM pick-up 15215 52nd Ave.South, Suite 10,Tukwila,WA 981W C206)764b471 SCAN 443-6471 FAX 7644067 FAX SCAN 443.4067 i i, 'eft • ❑ 8) Equip indoor parks with adequate _lightirW i.c hardware, properly marked exits (comply 10�,,_ ` N.F.P.A.101; Standards) ❑ 9) Provide an adequate drainage system to elJ*14ate water from ramps ❑Physical Facilities - Pr ices Liability ❑ 1) Conduct physical inspection of ramp, valkwsy, parking, and spectators area Look for: a) adequate lighting b) condition of ramps (free of gapg, ridges, cracks, foreign material e) trip, slip,,- and fall hazards ❑ 2) Post safety-rules/regulations for use ❑ Management SgR,jrvision -�$.rrors 8 omissions &U1211ity ❑ 1) Conduct equipment checks of all skateboards ' (3 2) Conduct periodic inspections of facilfti4i documenting inspection, repairs, and maintenance ❑3) Employ/Contract only qual if ied technicians for maintenance and repair ❑4) Require safety instruction and education_fgr all skaters ❑5) Require participants to wear personal protective gear at all times 1:16) Conduct inspections of personal prote,cti)I►*� equipment ❑7) Require First Aid and C.P.R. certification of all staff ❑8) Employ well trained, qualified staff ►e{rs 09) Provide full-time supervision 1310) Develop registration form and waiver .for, Participation in skat boarding activitiesi require a pletion of this form prior to participation f -so B rA Ogg V all a 0 62 z C13 V. CFO 0 JW 060 Is> 4) r R a cx is id"tga:js a rb a CM4 =-S 4) co .0 qp .5 9—-4 6,0 0).1, 1 A k�. N ZZ i c .0-u 00 A Bif 11 = E 1W I M CD MD f I ca j S .9 -100 Mfg owl Q 1 P 3 W r 0 > IOU chi :c1s z 10 06>% Yi .0 N+w�C rz ar :3 cd jO 2ta ft a m gco � 09 .5 b m as O A I:IA' O.Til: 'A 43- 14: La IV 13:� wig 0-5 Z L: SV(4 CL CL ok lzc -:a,gg IS -0. v 2! a! > -So W 0 A CL cd W CA cr:3 > cc IM Owl :�18 a 0 ,1 'a agp -00 2 ='*a 4 mu s 5 Una u 0 CC: 0. Cc 1 LA�ex W En On C. ,3r�l 4m. > = cn co 0 Z Q pip ova 1 lain ega"Cu tw (4i 0 93 i !08 80 EGU 1VI-al: 3 N t ,i �,'`3„'_ y �%�+ dI �• •, }S� It Y m >s•� Ilei .G€YI 3=3.�p2 "w MO �s �, •"� tF�°l o .¢'s �-,v.°� fir_S a 06 cu Ev » CD Lr L PM cu CD �ho•S .;� l 1 t � +r Q � � �.bv al 2 cc 4-1 FjJ j!j.g E 05. N.1i LM EM fuf1 'T -t _ v y tom'}• ` LCG<y �,� ¢CL C' ca M-c °SS gmaoJ ��C°err° Lwt m �wO� �OT � n ,c L� c 1''c- I y - S= _ � �r - M1�� qq �y � �g�� t Yy ,g' I Z • z U 30'°? i=J V }• .r•_. r S¢ CQ.c lu, i t l;l' '.s,,Y, a�U Y I' �fpm 7 S W JI q'j(15 t�� x - - Vic=-sue a _ � di u � ©A �^' o ? 3 Tzc _ •"a, E$ i°� (� i..�L. c W a _ +c �s pC �j1+ �'Ny C J �if„ U .O V.•- �c s�C _ -•*'i - - : 'R' d s EC iV�m 4C ■'rJ �'a it c 1 •i; a RIVERBEND GOLF COMPLEX,, {a� 1989-1990 REVENUE COMPARISOM PAW-3 -- . JANUARY $ 7, 176 $ 51789 FEBRUARY ' 51-365 5, 61 MARCH 10;835 22, 48 APRI L 29, 072 30 i,008 MAY 341451 34,175 JUNE 38, 381 37t,",237 32 JULY 41, 104 45, AUGUST 38, 120 39 J100 SEPTEMBER 31,011 37,2220 OCTOBER 131,830 14,3001 NOVEMBER 71428 5 "097 DECEMBER 61634 1t, 95 TOTAL $263,407 $280, 413 +6 . 5% r IN, ^3, RIVERBEND GOLF COMPLEX 1989-1990 REVENUE COMPARE ',, WNI PUTT 1$89 JANUARY $ 551 $ 598 FEBRUARY 422 762 MARCH 686 3�. 03 APRIL 5, 766 5,; 83 MAY 51293 3;' 23 JULY 5,433 6, 16 u 71263 8,740 AUGUST 81096 8,786 SEPTEMBER 4, 654 6"086 OCTOBER 11763 1 276 NOVEMBER 6779Ask DECEMBER 509 "1 F7. TOTAL $ 41, 113 $ 47,658 + 16% fv Fi RIVERBEND GOLF CQHPLE X � k; 1989-1990 REVENUE C014PARI LEs_sSONS JANUARY $ 1, 275 $ -©— FEBRUARY 2, 120 82 MARCH 6,810 8t939 APRIL 10, 354 , 14424 MAY 9, 320 -9*04 JUNE 10,426 10; 734 JULY 7, 587 9A20 AUGUST 7, 019 % 317 SEPTEMBER 3, 247 3,01663 OCTOBER 1, 215 31,560 NOVEMBER 51O 1�3 DECEMBER 430 1 .55 TOTAL $ 60, 313 $ 71r,518 +19%. Al 1989 CITY RECEIVED FROM CONCESSIONAIRE 15% OF ALL LESSON INCOME: 15% of $ 60, 313 = „ +122% 1990 CITY CONTRAcrrED WITH' 3 GOLF INSTRUCTS AND RECEIVED- 30% OF LESSONS INCOME: 30% of $ 71, 518 = �� i RIVERBEND GOLF COMPLEX 1989-1990 REVENUE COMPARI Usixims RANGE 1989 -- - JANUARY $ 14, 977 $ 1 421 FEBRUARY 14, 913 16 6$2 MARCH 28, 167 42,761 APRIL 511091, 564�745 MAY 46, 700 55o,716 JUNE 50, 525 56;,724 JULY 56, 176 791,,278 AUGUST 48, 910 57,:8 8 SEPTEMBER 36, 728 49` �8 OCTOBER 19, 907 24 334 NOVEMBER 14, 370 17165 65 DECEMBER 14; 170 101 '595 TOTAL $396, 634 $484r'353 +22% PAID To CONCESSIQNAIR9 IN 1989 20% OF INCOME BETWEEN $ 87 AND $125 THOU.SAJO, = $ 7, 600 10% OF INCOME BETWEEN $125 AND $140 THOU► = 11500 5% OF INCOME BETWEEN $140 AND $396 THOU$ , i = $2,1, 900 PLUS CONCESSIONAXRE WAS REIMBURSED FOR STAFF TIME ($5.00/HOUR) IN THE AMOUNT OF 27t56 $49,463 RIVERBEND GOLF CON Eli. 1989-1990 REVENUE COMPARISWS��� RGHANDXSE 1989 JANUARY $11, 267 $ �,115 FEBRUARY 10, 168 4215 MARCH 16, 221 1, APRI L 41, 588 1, 810 MAY 25, 264 1, 5+,0 JUNE 32� 405 9;'� 05 JULY 35, 013 14,,033 AUGUST 40, 306 19, 54 SEPTEMBER, 25, 704 14, OCTOBER 13, 327 '270 NOVEMBER 9# 931 17, , 26 DECEMBER 14,822 13, 90 TOTAL $276,016 $107, 82 - 610 19 9 - CITY RECEIVED F $276 , 000 HERCH 5% OF GROSS INCOME BETWEEN $120, 000' - $200: _ $4, 000 20 OF GROSS INCOME BETWEEN $200, 000 - $27 j. O = 1, 400 $5, 400 1990 Cily _ FOR 6 MONTH INCOME of $107, 6 2 30% PROFIT = $32,000 INCOME OF $276, 000 30% PROFIT - $82,000 -1 SUMMARY OF 1989 AND 1990, ' ,. 11 CITY PAID TO CONCESSIONAIRE PART-TIME SALARIES ($5.00/HOUR) $ 27 563 o OF DRIVING :RANGE INCOME $ 49 t 10 CONCESSIONAIRE PAID TO DJ;E CITY 5 o AND 2% OF 'MERCHANDISE SALES $ 5,400 15% OF LESSONS 9,06 LEASE - ANNUALLY LAW $ .21 o,64 CITY FURNISHED ALL MAINTENANCE AND EQUIPMEMIr AT DRIVING RANGE. CITY PICKED UP, WASHED AND RELOADED DISPENS !Nfx MACHINE WITH BALLS. THE BOTTOM LINE DRIVING RANGE OPERATION 1989 19990 DRIVING MANGE $347,471 $484, 353 % LESSONS 91,046 21, 455 % MERCHANDISE 5,400 32, 000 MINI PUTT 41, 113 47, 685 TOTAL INCOME $403,030 , $585t493 DIFFERENCE OF +$1821463 WITHOUT CONCESSIONA R9 OTHER COSTS TO THE CITY: LOSS OF LEASE INCOME $ 7, 200 ADDED STAFF & BENEFITS 90tOOO $97, 200 TOTAL ADDITIONAL INCOME TO THE CITY IN 1990.;�= ' $85, 263 WITH A FULL YEAR OF MERCHANDISE, I FEEL ' I ", NUMBER COULD GO TO $150, 000 - PLUS BETTER SERVICE #N0, PUBLIC RELATIONS. a�l RIVERBEND GOLF COMPLEX REVENUE COMPARISONS JANUARY COMPARISON • JULY COMPARISON JAN 1989 JAN 1"0 JAN 1991 JULY 1989_' a101990 JULY 1991 RIVERBEND 0 27�304 47,625 RIVERBEND 190,934 495i,523 RANGE 14,977 16,121 23,888 RANGE 56,176 ",278 LESSONS 1,275 0 4,420 LESSONS 7,587 9,420 MERCHANDISE 11,267 115 10,574 MERCHANDISE 35,013 14,033 MINI PUTT 551 598 842 MINI PUTT 7,263 0,740 PAR 3 7,176 5,789 6,039 PAR 3 41,104 49,392 35,246 49,927 93,388 338,07 352*386 0 FEBRUARY COMPARISON AUGUST COMPARISON FES 1989 FEB 1990 FEB 1991 AUG 1989 AN, 1990 AUG 1991 RIVERBEND 0 36,049 • 85,646 RIVERBEND 164,952 • 180,552. RANGE 14,913 16,632 46,526 RANGE 48,910 57,828 LESSONS 2,120 982 8,192 LESSONS 7,019 8,317 MERCHANDISE 10,168 425 16,699 MERCHANDISE 40,306 19,354 MINI PUTT 422 '752 1,946 MINI PUTT 8,096 8,786 PAR 3 5,365 5,,861 15,897 PAR 3 38,120 , 30,890 32,988 60,701 174,906 307,403 314,727 0 MARCH COMPARISON SEPTEMBER COMPARISON MAR 1989 MAR 1990 MAR 1991 SEP 1989 So 1990 SEP 1991 RIVERBEND 0 103,763 RIVERBEND 133,371 13�,397 RANGE 28,167 42,761 RANGE 36,728 49,864 LESSONS 6,810 8,939 LESSONS 3,247� 3,663 MERCHANDISE 16,221 1,888 MERCHANDISE 25,704 14,046 MINI PUTT 686 3,903 MINI PUTT 4,654 6,086 PAR 3 10,835 2Z,948 PAR 3 31,011 3?,220 62,719 . 184,202 0 234,716 250,276 0 APRIL COMPARISON OCTOBER COMPARISON APR 1989 APR 1990 APR 1991 OCT 1989 Ott 1990 OCT 1991 RIVERBEND 0 133,468 RIVERBEND 72,804 77,021 RANGE 51,091 56,745 RANGE 19,907 24,334 LESSONS 10,354 14,424 LESSONS 1,215• 3,560 MERCHANDISE 41,588 1,080 MERCHANDISE 13,327 14,270 MINI PUTT 5,766 5,983 MINI PUTT r 1,763 1,276 PAR 3 29,072 30,008 PAR 3 13,830 1;4,301 137,871 241,708 0 122,846 ' ,134,762 0 MAY COMPARISON NOVEMBER COMPARISON MAY 1989 MAY 1"0 MAY 1991 NOV 1989 NON 1990 NOV 1991 RIVERBEND 0 155,297 RIVERBEND 45,713 39,992 RANGE 46,700 55,716 RANGE 14,370 17,755 LESSONS 9,320 0,014 LESSONS 510 1,300 MERCHANDISE 25,264 1,450 MERCHANDISE 9,931 17,726 MINI PUTT 5,293 3,623 MINI PUTT 677 948 PAR 3 34,451 34,775 PAR 3 7,428 5,097 121,028 259,875 0 78,629 82,818 0 JUNE COMPARISON DECEMBER COMPARISON JUN 1989 JUN 1990 JUN 1991 DEC 1989• , 9 0 DEC 1991 RIVERBEND 135,832 153,004 RIVERBEND 49.50 ,735 RANGE 50,525 56,724 RANGE 14,170 0,595 LESSONS 10,426 10,734 LESSONS 4}30 1,165 MERCHANDISE 32,405 9,605 MERCHANDISE 14,41 690 MINI PUTT 5,433 6,816 MINI PUTT 1 174 PAR 3 38,381 37,237 PAR 3 4k , : i1,895 273,002 274,120 0 S6; 44,254 0 FIRST HALF OF YEAR: YEAR TO DATE: 662,854 1,070,533 268,294 1,830;637 -�'2,249,756 268,294 DIFFERENCE 407,679 (802,239) DIFFERENCE 419,119 (1,981,462) COMPLEX.WQ1 " � I i GOLF CARTS FACT SHEET PURCHASE PRICE OF 21 CARTS $ 69 1'm •1ST YEAR - LEASE 'PAYMENT 27,400 DIFFERENCE IN 1ST 12 MONTHS AND TOTAL PURCHASE PRICE 4lr786 36 MONTH LEASE PAYMENT 82,29 DIFFERENCE IN 36 MONTH LEASE AND TOTAL PURCHASE PRICE (4 GOLF CARTS) 13,083, EaC- B1T C to C�lTIG �tf�E1R/GA STA E AND MUNICIPAL LEAWURCHASE AGREEMENT ; LEASE RENTAL 1st PAYMENT ADVANCE RENTAI.PAYMEdVT' CAPITAL COST TERM PERIODS DATE OF EQUIPMENT 36 XMMonthly ❑Start Date First Rental and Last Ike ❑ Quarterly ❑1 Mo.from of$ 2,284.13 e + it be- $ 69,195.00 months (Check one) Start Date #V ❑ delivered to Lessor at time of signing this Lease. RENTAL PAYMENT AND AMORTIZATION SCHEDUI�90 Rental Payment Amount Credited Amount Credited to Early Purchase Number Rental Payment Amount Interest Capital St Option Price 1 2,284.13 0.00 2,284.13 68 249.09 2 2,284.13 684.67 1 3 2,284.13 668.31 1 61 6 1 4 2 •1 f 632.36 63 304.51 5 2,284.13 61 622.47 6 2,284.13 618.19 7 2. 284.13 601 .15 1 682 8 2 6.57 8 2,284.13 583.93 9 2,284.13 566.53 54.720.42 102,28413 548.95 1 ,735.17 52,950.54 11 531 .2 1 .752 93 51 162.55 12 2, .2 Agy 513.26 1 f 770 87, 49 356.27 13 2,ztt.13 495.14 8 14 2 284.13 &4 4 476.83 1 .8n7 29 45 68 15 1 458.34 16 2 439.66 17 420.78 1 18 284401 .72 1 38,123.74. 19 382.46 20 1 21 343.341,940.72 22 48 1,960.65 24 .01 23 303.42 11980.71-284 13 28 224.69 24 2,000 26 -69 25 2,021,45 26 2.284.13 _ 27 221.09 0 28 204 29 178.66 15,661.12 30 13 157.11 31 2,284.13 135.35 1 32 1 21707 33 91 .1521192.98 6,848.79 34 2,215.42 4,589.06 35 2,284.13 2 23g 2,306.21 36 2,284.13 23.14 2,260.99 (0.00) 8'7 .2p?�{/� 1%3 Oa3 D t�!� l �, Continued on Reverse Side li MEMO TO: Parks Committee FROM: Senior Advisory Committee Kent Senior Activity Center DATE: March 20, 1991 SUBJECT: Article Written by Lyle Price, Valley, wily News Concerning Possible Reshuffling and Crttion of New Departments at KeAst City Ball -----------------------•------------------- --------------- We, the undersigned elected representatives of the Senior Advisory Committee, urge you to please leave the Senior Activity Center under the directio4'of the Parks and Recreation Department. At this time we do not have room for the many classes and activities we would like to see implemented. We are allowed to use the facilities at Kent Commons and the playing fields at the present time. Under the proposed change we are concerned there might be a charge to the Senior Center to use these facili;tios. Rumor has been rampant for some time that the Seniors would be jpqupezed out of the Senior Activity Center and that the City eventually would use thik facility primarily for City business. We sincerely hope this is not so but feel it is a 4stinct possibility if Health and Human Services direct the operation of the Senior govity. Center. We strongly urge you to reject the proposed plan and we did. i�" to circulate petitions in the City to that effect in the near future. • � ,yam w�t '~'l`'_�'"'_`- �-� �C� G /1J '✓...�,.,�,�:�.::. fir' �.� / �' l..�.�'`c.�'�.ta 220 Wiss JanneyRlstneir Associates Inc. '8iat�,Avenue South,Suite 108 ' WJE � �� � Seattle,WA 95108 Engineers, Archite#s, Material Scientists a -3460 FAX:(206)768-3464 A' J M HANSON JO 0 W PFEIFEBRIOGE March 7, 199 1 WG HIME lYl �L6 ! 177J. In CHw JF WISS11E811 w JR JANNEY R C ELSTNER IRM 1 $A BORTZ T Z CHASTAIN J D CONNOLLY W DENO AT OERECHO E Ms. Lea Britting A J FRACZEK $A FREEMAN Of MEINHEIT Kent Senior Center C MI ��//TT//�� ^,, • WF PERLENCHIO 600 East Smith P L POPOWC JF BE=STICKER Kent, WA 98031 RHA TIOfi WE WHITE KJ 13EASLEY Re: Consultation on Deterlore e HJ HUNDERMAN d Flooring, Phase 2, NG O I K OHNSON Kent Senior Center,rent,WA.. SJ K LLE �/ E No. 29 GJ KLEIN W M M J KOOE R S KOZIOL R J KRAUSE R OFRAUG Dear Ms. Britting: 0LN , LEE PW LINE14AN A LONGINOW F,MAJEWSKI As you requested, this proposal letter lists a suggested scope of work to•,auament our report of SL M ME NOORE October 29, 1990. We understand that you have contacted the original-Axthitect and Contractor OOPE WJ NUGENT A E N N and asked that they contribute to performing the work that we recommend44 This additional work 'IS PATTERS7TEPSON L PETRYY will be done in attempt to more rigorously confirm to all parties the.nate of the problems and RC REED G P RENTSCHLER causes. TJ ROWE C L SEARLS JP STECICH nal construction documentation(photos,requests for .yment,change orders, FJ WILLSEA JA WINTZ RL WOHL materials shipping lists. OL ZWAYER JM ANOERSEN LA BACKUS O T SLAKE 2. Compare above to plans and specifications to confirm the requir�g configuration of the BK BUTTKE RA CECNNER system. P DREDG O OPEGGER JF OUNTEMANN L F ESTENSSORO LD FLICK WR HA»»E" 'DS HE1DBRiNK ICore additional areas of the kitchen and dining area floor slabs and iuspect the condition of F D BE KAESE KAEKEL the subgrade and note if and where a vapor barrier is present We supervise this work B B6 KEHOE OFOED to be done in the presence of the representatives of the original cp ic�or(s) and architect. PO RJ KRAUSE The coring will be performed by others. RJ KROGS N V LAND'RAO JR LANOGREN FH LAUK H$LIMATE 4. Prepare a letter recording the findings from the above work alogig via, Qilr conclusions. R A MARTINEK TL MCVINN MP MOPOEN TF PARET C PAU.S IN LL".PS R C M, FEES J SP'EiF.ER K N S-U R D STEI»BERG P,grORK .FFILIA•ED.GNSU.TAhTS We anticipate that the cost of the above services will be on the order of$4M tor Task 1,$300 for 9 6RES.EP R W GEPS'NE. Task 2,$1000 for TBsk 3 including 2 Cores,and$500 for Task 4. Ali vmr*,1%Wq be invoiced at the N R G.Efi— T.UGOY C T vc�' hourly rates. Shown Inlow, and in accordance with the attached Standard:terka s and Conditions EL aERPwE (August 1, 1990). roposed modifications to the Standard Terms and �4itions are listed in A p.weN R.58.8E $E AEST-KOV EN Attachment 2; theSe�,are similar to the modifications to changes or clar0k0dons requested in the RE AEST April 10, 1990 memo from Assistant City Attorney,Carolyn Lake. 11*e;$br tasks including,but not limited to project coordination,extended telephone calls, memo$,,r rch,and meetings will also be billed at the,hourly listed below; we request that you budget, '�br such tasks initially. CHICAGO DALLAS DENVER HONOLULU PRINCETON SAN FRANCISCO "A'TTLE WASHINGTON DC ERLIN.RIME ASSOCIATES DIVISION—AUSTIN AND CHICAGO CHASTAIN DIVISION-yATLANTA Wiss, Janney, Eistner AsspWates, Inc. Ms. Lea Britting March 7, 1991 Kent Senior Center Page 2 Hourly Time Charges for Professional Staff and SURWI Consultant. $110.00 Senior Engineer/Architect/Chemist $90.00 Sr. Specialist $65.50 Engineer I $62.50 Please return one executed copy of this proposal if you wish us to proceed with the g love-referenced work. Very truly yours, WISS,JANNEY, ELSTNER ASSOCIATES, INC. bona -�. Ronald L. Wohl, P.E. Project Manager RLW/mjv.582 Attachments Accepted Kent Senior Center By: Title: Date: w+ a 4 Wi , Janney, Elstner Associates, Inc. STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS Performance Wiss,Janney,Elstner Associates,Inc.(WJE)and Its employees will exercise the degre **Hi,,and care expected by customarily accepted practices and procedures. No warranties, expressed or lmplled .ItM made with respect to WJE's performance, unless agreed to in writing.WJE is not a guarantor of the pn*ct I' wl hits services are directed,and its responsibility is limited to work performed for the client.WJE Is not respon# for acts or omissions of the client,nor for third parties not under its direct control.WJE shall not be liable* 49apon for any special, Indirect or consequential damages including loss of use and loss of profit.WJE may rWc information supplied by the client engaging WJE,or its contractors or consultants,or information available from accepted reputable sources, without independent verification. Use of Reports, Drawings, Etc. WJE retains ownership of letters,reports,drawings,specifications,test data and notes.These documents or parts thereof may not be reproduced in advertisements,brochures,or sales material,nor uHWl or cent for any purpose other than the purpose for which they were prepared, nor by third parties,without the wr n permission of WJE. Conclusions by WJE based on test results are limited to the specific conditions for which Vp tests were performed. Proposals Proposals expire 120 days after submission to a client unless a different expiration limit Is kmluoed in the proposal. WJE may withdraw or modify a proposal at any time prior to acceptance by the client Fixed Price Contracts Where WJE and the client have,agreed to a fixed price contract,the following terms and conditions are specifically excluded:'Time Charges,Expenses,Equipment Usage,Affiliated Consultants,and Sutrc x*WAs0 Services.Progress payments will be arranged with the client. Other stated billing terms remain in effect. Time Charges Accrued on an hourly basis, unless other arrangements are established. Minimum timcharges of personnel at a job site is 8 hours per day,unless time can be utilized on another job.No increase In rates for overtime.No charge for out-of-town travel time of professional staff outside of normal 8-hour workday unless firma 14;productive.Technicians may charge up to 2 hours on weekdays for out-of-town travel outside of normal workday,�pr up to 4 hours per day for out-of-town travel on weekends. Billing rates may be increased annually, after non to the client. Expenses Public transportation; subsistence and out-of-pocket c4st,plus 5% expense incurred during travels communications; reproduction and shipping charges Expended materials for field and laboratory Cost plus 10% investigations; rental equipment; fees advanced on client's behalf Company or personal cars $0.361mi Company trucks or vans $0 ewmi Clients may be charged for the cost of providing copies of receipts or detailed "back-ur information concerning expenses. Equipment Usage Approximately equal to 1%of the replacement cost per day,subject to adjustment for:mir*rwrh or extended usage. Computer Usage Microcomputers: IBM Compatible 2861386, HP85, HP9816, $20.4whr others(incl.;CAD) Prime 2755 $0.015 par CPU Sec Time-sharing services Costplw, 10% Affiliated Consultants WJE retains certain consultants as independent contractors,but provides insurance ar4.aupport services.These consultants are billed at rates,equivalent to WJE employees of similar education." onal experience. Subcontracted Services ' Billed at cost plus 10%if firm has at least$500,000 of Professional/General Liability kwut*j",otherwise cost plus 20%. Mark-up not applied to subcontractor's reimbursable expenses,such as a subco�r's travel expenses. Storage Material samples not consumed in our work may be discarded 30 days after subrolsoloo,of the test report unless the client requests other disposition. Charges may be made, after notification,for exteNed'storage of materials, records, or equipment.WJE will exercise reasonable care in safeguarding materials, rends, or equipment, but assumes no liability for loss or damage. (Continued on other side) qJ! Safety ] Field work will be performed only under conditions deemed safe by our personnel,txcr y be made for safety or security measures required by hazardous job conditions. ,a Subpoenas and Court Orders The client is responsible,after nptification,for payment of time charges,attorney fwondpowr expenses resulting from a required response to subpoenas or court orders issued by any party in c onj . "�ft our work. Charges are based on billing rates in effect at the time of our response. Insurance WE is protected for general,automobile,workers'Compensation and employers'�;, by policies written by national insurance carriers rated by the A.M.Best Company.The primary limits are$1, 0 with a$2,000,000 aggregate on general liability.Excess coverage applies to exposures over$1,000,000. t1ncnts are not allowed. Coverage is subject to annual renewal. Billing Terms The firm or individual engaging;WJE is responsible for payment of charges unless WJE Is'rot Pied in writing,prior to the time that the charges are incurred,that the engagement is on behalf of anothir',parly,.,Accumulated charges will be billed in approximately monthly intervals. State and local sales and use tax will be included in the billing if applicable. Payment In full is due within 30 days of Invoice date. Invoices which area uapalcl after 30 days from the invoice date are subject to an interest charge at the rate of 1 V2%per month(or at-aJoYW maximum legal rate) plus related attorneys' fees and collection expenses. August 1, 1990 Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates, Inc. Attachment 2 The Following Amend or Clarify the WE Terms and Conditions(&ulW 41990) Only for Consoltation on Deteriorated Flooring,Phase 2, Kent-ilftW.,Center I. All materials,workupsi files,drawings,computer tapes,memorandum notes,ogd documents generated by WJE under this agreement shall be the property of the City. WJE way r4wo copies of the same for its own use. The City acknowledges that WJE's reports,field data,ftM,noies,laboratory test data, calculations, specifications, estimates and other similar documents are,lostpanonts of professional service, not products,. In return for WJE's relinquishment of ownership W said instruments of professional service,the City agrees to waive any claim against WJE,and cl N in and hold WJE harmless from any claim or liability for injury or loss allegedly art ng*m unauthorized reuse of WJE's instruments of service. The City further agrees to compensate WV for any time spent or expenses incurred by WJE in defense of any such claim, In accordance with WJOS prevailing fee schedule and expense reimbursement policy. II. Fixed price contracts -not applicable. III. Time Charges -Time will be billed door to door from our Seattle office. There will be no minimum time charged per site visit. IV. Expenses-Normally expected expenses(i.e.mileage,2 cores and patching of'siab),are included in the estimates. V. A. Dis utes. In;the event of any dispute arising under this coutract,par#es stipulate to the jurisdiction of King County Superior Court. Each party shall pay its owh attorney's fees and costs. B. Exclusive Terms of Ageement. Upon acceptance of this agreewen4 the;City and WJE agree that the provisions of this contract including any and all documents ijaorporated by reference herein including any written amendments shall constitute the entire agreement between the parties hereto and shall supersede any and all prior oral and writtes agreements relating to the subject matter hereof. This contract may not be modified or tepainAted verbally and-no modification or claimed waiver of any provisions hereof shall; be,,binoing unless made in writing and signed by the parties against whom such modification or waiver is sought to be enforced. C. Indemnification. WJE agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold ems,the City, its elected officials,officers,employees,and agents from any and all claims,*c#o nts,judgements,losses, costs (including reasonable attorney's fees), workmen's contp� dints with the State of Washington,and damages whatsoever including claims arising by x n accident,injury or death caused, to persons or property of any kind arising pa of S ►JE's negligence, in connection with,or incident to the work performed under this sgr�G ant. Applicable State Law. This proposal shall be governed and caastrr rdin g to the laws of the state ofWashington. WJE agrees to comply with applile Pions of any federal, state or loca law and ordinance,rules and regulations,and orders µo thereunder. Public Information. WJE shall not issue any statement or other Mows of information for public dissemination without the prior approval of the City of Kent However,a descriptive title of the project and the name of the client may be used by WJ$in lists of past projects used to document professional experience. Ak