Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Committees - Operations - 11/30/1994P_ OPE I&TI ONS COMMIT M *41N[JTE S NOVEMBER 30, 1994 COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT: Jon Johnson - Chair, Leona Orr, Christi Houser STAFF PRESENT: Ed Allen, Norm Angelo, Tom Brubaker, Arthur Martin, Brent McFall, May Miller, Laurie Murray, Kelli O'Donnell, Patty Roseto, Sue Viseth, Tom Vetch MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC: None. The meeting was called to order at 9:32 a.m. by Chairperson Johnson. Amproval of Vouchers All claims for the period ending November 15, 1994, in the amount of $2,501,011.31 were approved for payment. Long -`Perm Disability Plan Enhancement - Contract Human Resources Director Sue Viseth explained that currently the City provides long-term disability which pays 50% sof an employees salary after an 180 day elimination period. Employees now have the option of purchasing enhancements to this plan the most beneficial of which lowers the elimination to 90 days. Viseth stated that at her request the City's insurance broker requested competitive bids and also looked at those that could be easily enhanced. In addition to the benefits provided, the tax implications for those who have purchased enhancements has been nightmarish due to benefits being divided between taxable and non- taxable income which can be complex when the benefit is utilized. Sue explained that the broker had checked on UNUM as the low bidder and found them to be a reputable well rated company. In addition to simplifying tax implications, the option of the City enhancing the LTD would be of benefit to the City due to the out of pocket expense of paying sick leave for employees who have accrued benefits over 180 days. With a 90 day elimination,' the City would benefit as well as providing more protection to the employees. She noted that the cost would be an additional $5,000 which would be funded out of the self insurance fund. Viseth asked for authorization to enter into a contract with UNUM on or about January 1, 1995. Orr moved to approve the request and authorize the signing of a contract effective on or about January 1, 1995. Houser seconded and the motion passed 3-0. Minitor Pager Replacement Authorization Fire Chief Norm Angelo explained to the Committee that unlike a regular pager, the Minitor pager provides a separate channel which is a direct link to 911 as well as radio contact capabilities. Norm stated that there are a number of older Minitor pagers that have been utilized and unfortunately the 800 mhz system does not allow for paging and maintenance costs are increasing on the older pagers. The Chief noted that as a result of the Entiat-fire $50,000 was reimbursed to the City for personnel and almost $70,000 was received due to an addition $19,799 reimbursement for miscellaneous costs for the rental of apparatus. No damage was sustained to the equipment and the fire district has possession of the rig. The Fire Commissioners have agreed to use these one time funds for the replacement of the Minitor pagers. Chief Angelo proposed that the additional $7,000 be funded from the hearing equipment fund which has remaining funds available. He noted thit the purchase of replacement pagers would be utilized by volunteers. Angelo asked that if this is acceptable the item be placed on the Consent Calendar of the City Council meeting. Houser moved to authorize the use of $19,799 of State reimbursement money and $7,000 from the headset/communication equipment project for the purchase of replacement pagers for the Fire Department. Orr seconded the motion which carried 3-0. OPERA.TI�S COMMITTEE MINUTE Aont NOVEMBER 30, 1994 L gislative Package for 1995 Government Affairs Manager Arthur Martin stated that in meeting with member cities of Suburban Cities Association (SCA) and Association of Washington Cities (AWC) it was noted that cities have not had the ability to effectively lobby. Member cities brought together a list of 40 issues and narrowed the list down to 10 proposals with the hopes that lobbying can be coordinated through a combined schedule. He noted that some issues are not a major issue for Kent but all have some impact through which Kent's specific needs can be tied into the whole. Assistant City Attorney Brubaker noted that the current legislation on annexation is punitive to cities explaining that if an area is annexed after March 1 of any year no property tax revenue is generated for 18 months. Arthur noted that this dilemma had been discussed. Afier;further discussion, Orr moved to approve the legislative package and give Arthur Martin authority to lobby on these issues. Houser seconded the motion which passed 3-0. Committeemember Houser asked that proposed motions be included with agenda materials in the,future. Martin stated that he wished to thank Councilmember Orr for her help on the Kiag County Comprehensive Plan. Public Defense Contract Prosecuting Attorney Ed Allen stated that he was here on behalf of Roger Lubovich and explained that for the past two years the City has utilized Ellis, Li & McKinstry and for a number of reasons it was decided to go out for bid. Among the problems was the lack of experienced criminal defense attorneys who could make quick decisions and process a large number of cases as required by the congested court calendar. Another reason, Allen stated, was the lack of a local presence. With their offices located in downtown Seattle it makes,,it difficult for them to meet with their clients many of which have no privilege to drive. This has resulted in delays due to attorneys meeting with clients in the courtroom during proceedings running up City overtime costs. Ed noted that a matrix had been prepared from the eight proposals received highlighting experience, public defense experience, number of lawyers available, and office location. He noted that Director of Operations Brent -McFall had reviewed the proposals and had a primary recommendation and a secondary recommendation. Brent McFall stated that after consultation with the Attorney's office he would recommend authorization to negotiate a contract with Tim Jenkins and Patrick Hardy ba ed `upon their experience and reputation as well as their local presence. As an alternate, Mcl r + ",tnmended Stewart and Goss. After discussion of the number of cases anticipated, Hain mated that it would be nice to have office space in Kent. Orr questioned the possibility tgo over the maximum cases and asked what would happen in that case. Ed responded that the;n.ount per case over the limit would be negotiated in the area of $90-$125 per case. Houser inquired as to the length of the contract and was informed it would be a 12 month contract from 111/95 to 12/31/95. Houser asked why Jenkins was recommended over Scott Stewart. McFall replied that the added experience of a former prosecutor and experience of providing services as Auburn's public defender was significant. Allen added that in addition to having the most experience Jenkins has the ability to provide the needed coverage as well as having experience Page 2 OPTION COMMITTEE S MATES, Cont .= NOVEMBER 30, 1994 handling the actual contract implementation. Houser noted her concern of going over 1350 cases. During further discussion Houser noted that Stewart and Goss also had office space two blocks from the court. Orr stated she had two concerns; the dollar amount and the accessibility when also handling Auburn's public defense contract. Allen stated that he anticipated that Jenkins and Hardy would each take responsibility for one jurisdiction. He also noted that the low figure received from Stewart and Goss was an effort to get an initial contract and would probably be higher in any future years. Assistant City Attorney Brubaker added that a low figure can work against the City if it becomes a disincentive to fully administer the contract. After further discussion, Committeemember Houser moved to enter into negotiations with'Stewart and Goss for the public defense services for the City of Kent. Orr seconded the motion which passed 3-0. 1994 Receivables Write -Off May Miller requested authorization to write-off $8,520.11. She explained that this action would remove these funds from the books while still allowing the City to make collection if possible. Miller reviewed the graphs included with the agenda noting the decline in write-offs requested. May complemented the staff who had been working on reducing the amount of write-offs. Customer Services Manager Tom Vetsch stated that the numbers continue to go down and complimented Patty Roseto on her work with departments to accomplish this. He noted that in 1995 his department will be looking at a cashiering system that will work with accounts receivable and will take over the 5 letter follow up currently contracted out while still contracting out the difficult collections. Leona asked if there was a set annual fee currently. Vetsch replied that most accounts were $8.45 each while difficult accounts were paid at 50 to 60%. May Miller recommended that these write-offs be approved and go on the Consent Calendar of the next City Council meeting. Orr so moved, Houser seconded and the motion passed 3-0. 1994 Budget .Adjustment Ordinance May Miller explained that once a year this item is brought forward as a housecleaning item. She explained that her department keeps track of items approved through the year. The majority of the items requesting approval were previously approved with the following exceptions. The insurance fund needed to be revised to account for accidents, etc., the unemployment claims received needed adjustment, liability insurance settlements needed to be transferred from reserves, Central Services had additional expenses from Court rental, annexation and Cable TV start-up costs. Additionally, internal services required accounting of seized assets, the golf course had received higher revenue on the restaurant requiring additional payment to the contractor and as a final step for the budget process the final salary credit needed to be approved. May explained that this action would also cover a line -of -credit required at the end of the year to cover payment of community development costs which are reimbursed from the State after expenses are incurred. Miller recommended approval of the 1994 budget adjustment. Orr inquired as the $45,000 allocated for postage and printing with the need for additional Page 3 OPER.ATAS COMMITTEE MINUTES!Cont NOVEMBER 30,1994 annexation mailings, etc. in 1995. Miller clarified that an extra $20,000 had been included for 1995 with a total City-wide budget of $126 572. Further, if annexation did' ty- g pass, a supplemental budget would be prepared to cover additional expenses. Johnson asked if unemployment claims were going down or if employees were being rehired. Miller noted that a firm had been hired recently to monitor these expenses. Lauric Murray noted that some claims were still being paid with a departure date of July 1992 which she will be looking into. Houser moved to approve the 1994 budget adjustment ordinance and H&CD line of credit. Orr seconded the motion which passed 3-0. December Committee Meetings After Committee discussion, it was confirmed that the Committee would cancel the December 14th meeting and meet on December 28th. Houser noted that she would not be able to attend. October Financial Report May Miller distributed the October financial report to the Committee. During review of the report Miller noted on Page 6 the general fund revenue had increased in October and was up 2% in total. Page 7 showed the general fund close to budget, she noted that retroactive, pay, for the Police contract settlement had reduced the amount of cash last month. Miller pointed out that on page 9 the sales tax had been reported up 15.5% for October and that upon inquiry, no one- time payments stood out. She elaborated that the actual tape had not been received .to conduct in depth analysis. Jon noted that the wire service was reporting that the mood of consumers was improving. Miller noted on page 10 that when one-time payments were taken out, ,Wes tax was up 5.2% for the year. She noted that retail was up with 709 businesses reporting 27% of sales tax collected. In reviewing the building permit revenue and valuation Miller expla�ued that it may be time to adjust budgeting in this area since the area was becoming built out a higher majority of permits were for tenant improvements and renovation. After rev�ewing the remainder of the report, Miller noted that the criminal justice grant had been received at $50,000. Jon Johnson asked what the minimum fund balance required is. Miller stated that $200,000 would be required and 1994 will end with $500,000. A discussion followed regarding the fund balance and bond rating. Miller noted that the City's debt had also been r6duced. King County • Allocations ; Arthur Martin informed the Committee that King County Councilmembers ` `,� ..1�bility to allocate $100,000 at their discretion for their districts. He noted that these, fp uld be available to Kent from Vance as well as a portion from VonReichbauer and Pia' ;end asked if Council had any programs they would like to request funding for. I46tl et ,noted her preference for additional senior housing grants for Harrison House. After further discussion, the meeting adjourned at 11:05a.m. r Page 4