HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Committees - Land Use and Planning Board - 08/28/2000 PLANNING SERVICES
Fred N Satterstrom,AICP, Manager
Phone 253-856-5454
Fax 253-856-6454
KENT
w.s H i N c T o H Address 220 Fourth Avenue S
Kent,WA 98032-5895
LAND USE & PLANNING BOARD MINUTES
Public Hearing
August 28, 2000
The meeting of the Kent Land Use and Planning Board was called to order by Chair Jon Johnson at
7.00 p in on Monday, August 28, 2000 in Council Chambers of Kent City Hall
LAND USE & PLANNING BOARD STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT
MEMBERS PRESENT
Jon Johnson, Chair Fred N Satterstrom, AICP, Planning Manager
Steve Dowell Charlene Anderson, AICP
David Malik Diana Nelson, AICP
Sharon Woodford Ernie Rideout, Fire Prevention
Terry Zimmerman Pamela Mottram, Admm Secretary
LAND USE & PLANNING BOARD
MEMBERS ABSENT
Ron Harmon, Vice Chair, Excused
Brad Bell, Excused
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
David Malik MOVED and Steve Dowell SECONDED to approve the minutes of July 24, 2000.
Motion carried.
ADDED ITEMS TO THE AGENDA
Planning Manager Satterstrom stated that staff would like to discuss the Board's representation on the
Short Plat Committee as other business.
COMMUNICATIONS
None
NOTICE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS
Planning Manager Satterstrom stated that the application submittal deadline for the City of Kent's
annual comprehensive plan amendments is September 1 at 5 00 pm He stated that the applications
would be reviewed at the Board's September workshop with the Land Use and Planning Board's
public heanng scheduled for November and final approval by Council to be carved out after the first
of the year.
•
Land Use and Planning Board Minutes
August 28, 2000
Page 2
•+�#ZCA-2000-3 KENT DOWNTOWN DESIGN GUIDELINES AMENDMENT
Planner Diana Nelson stated that public notices on the proposed amendment were mailed out
with the attached map indicating zoning designations. The map was intended to indicate
currently existing zoning designations and not to mislead the public in thinking that zoning
would change She stated that the guidelines amendment relates to development within the
downtown planning area only.
Ms Nelson stated that the Downtown Design Guidelines are the culmination of ongoing efforts
for Kent's downtown area beginning with the implementation of Kent's downtown plan in 1989.
A downtown design review process was established in 1992 and the Kent Comprehensive Plan
was adopted in 1995, which included goals and policies supporting downtown visioning and
guidelines for development
Ms Nelson stated that the 1998 Downtown Strategic Action Plan recommended detailed design
guidelines for the entire downtown planning area In 1999 the Central Avenue Design
Guidelines were adopted and provide the basis for future design guidelines for all districts in the
downtown planning area.
Ms. Nelson stated that a zoning code revision is required to adopt and administer the proposed
downtown design guidelines which incorporate the guidelines adopted for the Central Avenue
area as well as the current guidelines for downtown design review. Staff has added special
• guidelines addressing the traditional character and commercial nature of the historic core district.
Ms. Nelson stated that James Street is bordered by the downtown planning area on the north,
Willis Street on the south, State Route 167 on the west, with an eastern boundary that follows
Titus and Kennebeck.
Ms. Nelson stated that the guidelines would apply to new construction and developments
relocating to new sites, and includes parking lots and landscaping She stated that the guidelines
would apply to existing buildings if they were to change exterior facades, parking or
landscaping
Ms. Nelson stated that changes to the proposed guidelines since the workshop include:
• Adding additional guidelines for transit oriented development in Section IA 1
• Adding guidelines regarding the reduction of parking lot areas in Section I.C.2 a
through d
• Clarifications to the building setback sections of 1.13 1 and 1.B.2
• The exceptions section was moved from 1 B 7 to 1 A 3
• Several introductory sections were formatted with definitions added for the historic
core district along with a map to illustrate location, surface parking, structured
parking, axial symmetry and circulation referred to in the text but not defined
• Changing the title page and Section headers as needed to incorporate the word
"design" in front of"guidelines"
• Clarifying definitions for "Gateways", "Incompatible Uses", "Pedestrian Oriented
Use" and "Transit Oriented Development".
Land Use and Planning Board Minutes
August 28, 2000
Page 3
Ms Nelson stated that staff recommends approval of the guidelines as submitted and requests
that the Board forward a recommendation to the City Council to approve the guidelines and
zoning code amendment.
In response to Ms Woodford, Ms. Nelson stated that a"Do This" graphic will be added to the
pedestrian safety guidelines and the "Pedestrian Overlay" graphic on page l l recreated, prior to
sending this on to City Council.
Chair Johnson opened the public hearing.
Sam Baugh, 220 Railroad Avenue North, Kent, WA 98032 a Kent resident, questioned who
would absorb the expense if a building owner desired to restructure his building to meet the new
design guidelines
Ms. Nelson stated that a building owner is responsible for any improvements he requests
associated with the type of building permit applied for She reiterated that the guidelines would
not be in effect unless an applicant requested a building permit to restructure or change the
exterior fapade of the building, parking configuration or landscaping.
Linda Johnson, 206 Railroad Avenue North, Kent, WA 98032 stated that as the Executive
Director for the Kent Downtown Partnership, her committee has been working on an ongoing
basis with the city on these guidelines.
• Ms. Johnson stated that projects under $100,000 would not be subject to complete review,
allowing business owners some flexibility in renovating or painting their businesses She stated
that Neimann Glass used the Central Avenue Design Guidelines, resulting in a beautiful facility.
She encouraged the Board to send this amendment on to the Council.
David Malik MOVED and Sharon Woodford SECONDED to close the public hearing. Motion
earned
Steve Dowell voiced his concerns over building setback and traffic issues and questioned if these
concerns have been addressed.
Ms. Nelson stated that Steve Mullen, Transportation Engineer with City of Kent Public Works
commented that buildings should be setback at intersections rather then constructed up to the
edge of sidewalks, so that sight distance would not be restricted
Ms. Nelson stated that provisions in the guidelines allow buildings to be set back at corners but
not require these setbacks She stated that concern has been voiced that every intersection should
have either stop signs or a light for traffic control if buildings are built up to a corner. Ms.
Nelson stated that most of those intersections already have stop signs or lights in place in the
downtown planning area.
Ms Nelson stated that Kent's construction standards require sight distance visibility. The
guidelines allow buildings to be set back at least 20 feet from the corner of the intersection, with
• additional setback provision when providing space for pedestrian oriented amenities
Ms Nelson voiced her view that sufficient flexibility is built into the guidelines to handle sight
distance issues She suggested that parking could be more restricted on the corners than it is
Land Use and Planning Board Minutes
August 28, 2000
Page 4
currently. She stated that larger vehicles can block visibility even more than a building might at
a corner.
Ms. Nelson stated that the other concern expressed by Steve Mullen was lighting levels, which
tend to be too bright in certain areas, creating shadow or glare impact visibility
Mr. Dowell questioned if there is recourse available if the Downtown Design Review Guidelines
q g
Committee and the applicant do not agree on requirements.
Ms. Nelson stated that an applicant may discuss the issue and negotiate with the Public Works
Department and Planning Services before their application goes before the Downtown Design
Review Committee. She stated that an applicant can appeal a local government decision
In response to Ms. Woodford, Ms. Nelson clarified Linda Johnson's statement about minor
construction of under $100,000 not being subject to the design guidelines. Ms Nelson stated
that the section on application of design guidelines states that "Downtown design review is
conducted by an administrative committee except for modifications of existing buildings and
sites which cost less than $100,00 which are reviewed by Planning Services." She stated that
proposals that do not modify building exteriors or the site are exempt from design review.
Steve Dowell MOVED and Sharon Woodford SECONDED to approve Staffs recommendation
for #ZCA-2000-3 Kent Downtown Design Guidelines Amendment and forward it to the City
• Council. Motion CARRIED
OTHER BUSINESS
LAND USE & PLANNING BOARD BY-LAWS AMENDMENT
Planner Charlene Anderson stated that in the interest of brevity, the memo sent to the Board is
clear as to the text changes that need to be implemented in the By-Laws.
Sharon Woodford MOVED and David Malik SECONDED to approve staffs recommendations
for the Land Use and Planning Board By-Laws Amendment, as impacted by Ordinance #3512
and pass this on to the City Council.
BOARD REPRESENTATION ON THE SHORT PLAT COMMITTEE
Mr Satterstrom stated that a subdivision procedure amendment was brought before the Land Use
and Planning Board this year and thereafter adopted by the City Council. This amendment
included evaluating the procedures for reviewing short plats, long subdivisions and lot line
adjustments Mr Satterstrom stated that prior to the review of these procedures, the Short Plat
Committee consisted of a number of staff members and one member from the Land Use and
Planning Board.
Mr. Satterstrom stated that the Land Use and Planning Board, in practice, were not represented
on the Short Plat Committee In reviewing the ordinance and the review procedures, the Board
he 1 Committee tin requested that they be represented at t Short Plat C ee meetings
• As Chair of the Short Plat Committee Mr Satterstrom urged the Board members to elect one
member to represent the Board consistently at the Short Plat Committee meetings.
Ms Woodford stated that she attended an August meeting and felt it unnecessary for the Land
Use and Planning Board to be represented at the Short Plat Committee meetings as a Board
Land Use and Planning Board Minutes
August 28,2000
Page 5
member would not have valuable information to contribute to the discussion even though the
meeting was interesting
Ms. Zimmerman stated that attending the Committee meetings could benefit the Land Use and
Planning Board members by giving them insight into the rules and regulations that apply to short
plats, thereby, providing the members with more experience and another voice to represent the
community.
Mr Satterstrom stated that 95% of the conditions reviewed at the Short Plat Committee meetings
consist of public work standards, Those standards are decided by the Public Works Committee
and City Council
Mr. Satterstrom stated that if the Land Use and Planning Board felt that their representation was
not necessary at the short plat meetings, a change in the ordinance would be required as well as a
change to the section of the subdivision code that speaks to the composition and membership of
the Short Plat Committee
Ms. Zimmerman voiced concern over eliminating the Land Use and Planning Board's
involvement and suggested that the Board should schedule attendance through the end of this
year and than reevaluate whether the Land Use and Planning Board should continue participating
in the meetings
The Board members set up the following attendance schedule:
• Steve Dowell, last meeting of August
• David Malik, first week of September
• Brad Bell was volunteered for the remainder of September (contingent on his
acceptance)
• Terry Zimmerman, October
• Jon Johnson, November
• David Malik, December
Mr. Satterstrom stated that typically two short plat meetings are scheduled each month on
Thursday mornings at 10 00 am.
ADJOURNMENT
Chair Jon Johnson adjourned the meeting at 7.45 pm.
Respectfully Submitted,
F ed N Satterstrom, AICP
)Secretary