HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Committees - Land Use and Planning Board - 02/10/1997 CITY OF dwc�\12012 BIT
•
Jim White, Mayor
Planning Department (206) 859-3390/FAX(206)850-2544
James P Harris,Planning Director
LAND USE & PLANNING BOARD MINUTES
Public Hearing
February 10, 1997
The meeting of the Kent Land Use and Planning Board was called to order by Chair Steve Dowell
at 7.00 p.m. on February 10, 1997, in Chambers West of Kent City Hall.
LAND USE & PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT:
Steve Dowell, Chair
Brad Bell, Vice Chair
Tom Brotherton
Jerry Daman
Ron Harmon
David Malik
Sharon Woodford
LAND USE & PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ABSENT:
None
PLANNING STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT:
James Harris, Planning Director
Matthews Jackson, Planner/GIS Coordinator
Teresa Beener, Administrative Secretary
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Board member Sharon Woodford identified an error in the minutes. The date in the opening
paragraph should be November 25, 1996 not May 29, 1996
Board member Ron Harmon MOVED to approve the minutes from the November 25, 1996 meeting
with the correction as noted above and Board member David Malik SECONDED the motion.
Motion carried.
ADDED ITEMS TO THE AGENDA
None.
COMMUNICATIONS
None
#ZCA-97-1 Green Raver Corridor Special Interest District
220 4th AVE SO,/KENT W ASH IN(,TON 98032-5895 I TELEPHONE (206)859-3300 f FAX#859-3334
• Land Use and Planning Board Minutes
February 10, 1997
Page 2
NOTICE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS
Planning Director Jim Harris informed the Board that the next meeting will be a public hearing held
on February 24, 1997, in City Council Chambers West at 7:00 p.m
INTRODUCTION OF NEW MEMBER
Chair Steve Dowell introduced the new Land Use and Planning Board member Sharon Woodford.
Chair Dowell requested that a letter of appreciation be written to past Board member Gloria LaBore
for her hard work and dedication
ELECTION OF OFFICERS
Chair Steve Dowell opened the floor for nominations for chair and vice chair. Planning Director Jim
Harris explained that offices can be reelected for a second term Board member David Malik J
nominated Steve Dowell as chair and Brad Bell for vice chair and Board member Ron Harmon
seconded the nomination
Ron Harmon MOVED and Tom Brotherton SECONDED a motion to close the nominations.
Motion carried Steve Dowell and Brad Bell were elected chair and vice chair. f
#ZCA-97-1 GREEN RIVER CORRIDOR REGULATIONS (M. Jackson)
Planner Matt Jackson explained that the planning department received a request for a regulatory
review from Gary Volchok on behalf of the Benaroya Company. The request was to review section
15 08 260 of the Kent Zoning Code which relates to the Green River Corridor Special Interest
District Regulations The Green River Corridor Special Interest District is generally described as
two strips of land within 1000 feet of the high water mark of the Green River on either sidea
Mr Jackson explained that the regulatory review process was created by the City Council to give
the public an opportunity to be involved in the regulatory process The public can present
suggestions for changes, deletions, or additions to the code If the Council decides that the
suggestion warrants merit they can refer the item to the Land Use & Planning Board for a public
hearing, hence tonight's hearing.
The staff reviewed Section 15.08.260 of the Kent Zoning Code that relates to the exterior walls of
buildings on nverfront lots. At this time, the regulations limit the length of exterior walls that are t
parallel to or forty-five degrees (45°) of parallel to the river to a maximum length of 200 feet. The
applicant has suggested that this regulation is no longer relevant based on significant changes in
circumstances since the establishment of the Green River Corridor
The specific regulations for development in the corridor were established by Ordinance in 1985. The
• Corridor was established through the Vallek Studies which were passed in 1981. The general intent
4ZCA-97-1 Green River Corridor Special Interest District
• Land Use and Planning Board Minutes
February 10, 1997
Page 3 F
'A.
of the regulations in the Corridor were to protect the environment of the areas near the Green River,
to ensure that urban development that happened within that area was compatible with the natural
characteristics of the Green River, and to protect any type of recreational land (parks, open space,
etc) that is located adjacent to the river
Mr. Jackson explained that since the regulations were enacted the City of Kent purchased
approximately 292 acres of land The City has established the area which is now known as the Kent
Lagoons Project The Kent Lagoons is a regional storm water, wetlands, and habitat area Jackson
stated that this area is a substantial piece of property which will be permanently protected for open
space and habitat.
The City has established development standards for properties which contain wetlands. Jackson
stated that there is a general policy of no net loss of wetlands The City tries to protect any
significant wetland and creates buffers of 25 to 50 feet around the wetland perimeter to protect their
function as a wetland
• The zoning on the west side of the river is agricultural. There has been no significant development
in that area since these regulations went into place. The zoning and the Comprehensive Plan which
the City Council passed in 1995 does not project any significant development in that area.
Mr. Jackson explained that the general intent of the Corridor has been met He stated that there are
only a few undeveloped properties left in the Corridor and allowing for an adjustment in our
standards is merited at this time. There are environmental constraints on some of the properties in
this area which limits the way you can place the buildings on the lots.
Staff recommends adding the following language as subsection(a)to the Kent Zoning Code Section
15.08 260 (D)(7):
Buildings on riverfront lots in the MA, MI, MI-C, M2, and M3 zoning districts may have
exterior walls parallel to, or within forty-five (45) degrees of parallel to, the river which
exceed two hundred(200)feet in length,provided they are screened by a by vegetative buffer
per Section 15 08 260 (D)(9)c,
and adding the following language as subsection (c)to Section 15.08.260 (13)(9):
Buildings on riverfront lots in industrial zoning districts which have exterior walls exceeding
two hundred(200)feet in length parallel to, or within forty-five (45) degrees of parallel to,
the river, must be screened by a vegetation buffer This vegetative buffer shall be located
• along the length of the property line located parallel to, or within forty-five (45) degrees of
4ZCA-97-1 Green River Corridor Special Interest District
• Land Use and Planning Board Minutes
February 10, 1997
Page 4
parallel to, the river,for a minimum depth of twenty (20)feet in accordance with Type III,
Visual Buffer landscape standards (Section 15 07 050 C) In addition, an earth berm of a
minimum of forty-eight (48) inches in height must be provided for
Jackson remarked that these changes would preserve the original intent of the Corridor and also
allow for the flexibility that is necessary to develop the last few properties.
Board member Ron Harmon questioned the area effected by this change. Jackson explained that the
original request made by Mr Volchok was more site specific He clarified that the regulatory review
is not a project specific review, it is a review of a regulation based on changes that have occurred
since the regulation was enacted.
Jackson remarked that there are other regulations which are a part of the Green River Corridor
Special Interest District At this time, staff is only proposing to amend this one condition.
I
Board member Tom Brotherton asked staff to provide some history behind the original regulation.
Mr Jackson explained that this was a combination of issues to protect the river from encroachment
by a wall of industrial buildings He explained that the shoreline management acts and our shoreline
i
standards in the City of Kent regulate properties within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of
the river No buildings may be placed within 200 feet of the river
There was a potential for a corridor of industrial buildings and the main intent of the regulations
were to place buildings in the most desirable sense in an east west configuration as opposed to a ;
north south direction This was to provide open areas between buildings to protect the aesthetic
quality of the river and provide access to open space.
Chair Steve Dowell queried whether there was a maximum building length proposed. Jackson
explained that staff is not proposing to limit the length The buildings can be greater than 200 feet
in length if they provide the vegetation buffer They would have to provide that vegetation buffer
to mitigate for the additional building length
Vice chair Brad Bell questioned what the maximum building size could be based on the size of the
property Jackson stated that Mr Volchok could better address that question He clarified that the
change is merited with or without the applicant's project. t
Chair Steve Dowell questioned whether there were other regulations which restricted the activity of
the warehouse such as the location of parking or loading docks which side faces the river, etc
Mr. Jackson explained that there is a regulation that prevents the dock high loading doors from
facing the river and staff is not recommending any changes to that requirement at this time. i
#ZCA-97-1 Green River Corridor Special Interest District
Land Use and Planning Board Minutes
February 10, 1997
Page 5
Brotherton questioned whether the screening requirement was adequate to provide a visual screen
for the facility from the meandering river viewpoints. Mr Jackson explained that landscaping of a
minimum of twenty (20) feet in depth in conjunction with the forty-eight inch (48") berm is an
adequate visual screen Mr Harris added that the regulation would require all of the property line
from the building to the river to be buffered and each building would require an individual landscape ;
buffer Mr. Jackson explained that the intent is not to have a 100% site obscuring screen but rather
to provide a visual relief.
Chair Steve Dowell opened the public hearing
Mr. Gary Volchok, 1420 Fifth Avenue#1700, Seattle,WA 98101 Mr Volchok explained that r
he is representing the Benaroya Company who is attempting to attain approximately 58 acres from
the 292 acres the City presently owns. He explained that the majority of this land is being used for
flood control, storm water retention, wetlands, and the like.
He stated that out of the 58 acres being acquired 33 acres are net usable. The other 25 acres are the
• buffer zones and the existing wetlands He explained that Benaroya is not encroaching, moving, or
attempting to fill any of the existing wetlands
a
Mr. Volchok related that he was an active participate in the development of the Valley Studies. He
explained that at the time the study was written UP had owned the majority of this property The
City limited the building length to no greater than 200 feet along the river to prevent a wall effect
along the Green River.
Volchok stated that the wetlands regulation came into effect and basically wiped out the ability to
develop properties in these areas. The City then purchased 292 acres. The Benaroya company
worked with the City to come up with a plan to purchase and develop 58 acres.
Mr. Volchok explained that the Benaroya company is proposing to first class development The
a
buildings would be heavily landscaped and the road being proposed is a full four lane with a
landscaped median.
Chair Steve Dowell questioned the building layout Mr Volchok identified the parking for building
"C"would be located in back and on the north and south. He stated that the dock high doors were
located on the west side of the building. j
Vice Chair Brad Bell clarified that the plans being proposed have not been approved and the Board
is not taking any specific action on these individual plans
9
#ZCA-97-1 Green River Corridor Special Interest Distract
1
Land Use and Planning Board Minutes
February 10, 1997
Page 6
Mr. Volchok explained that the Benaroya company wants to work with the City. They want to move
forward on the construction and already have received a fill and grade permit for the property
Board member Jerry Daman questioned what the color of the building would be. Mr. Volchok
explained that Mr Benaroya likes to go with natural tones Daman commented that he is concerned
with the location of the doors.
Mr Harris explained that the plans will be reviewed and those issues addressed administratively.
The plans could be changed a number of times yet and the Board is not deciding based on this
project, but rather amending the regulation.
Board member David Malik questioned whether the loading docks or parking would be facing the
Green River Mr Volchok stated that the loading docks would be on the side of the river 200 feet
back from the river
0
Mr. Harris again stated that the issue would be addressed administratively or through a variance
procedure before the Hearing Examiner.
Harmon MOVED and Daman SECONDED a motion to close the public hearing. Motion carried.
a
�l
Harmon questioned the staff reasoning for expanding the area effected from the original request. N{
Mr. Harris explained that regulations are developed to be good for the whole and limiting an
exception to one specific project is not the intent.
Vice Chair Brad Bell MOVED and Malik SECONDED a motion to recommend approval of staff s
recommendation as detailed above. Motion carried.
Board member Ron Harmon MOVED and Sharon Woodford SECONDED a motion to adjourn.
Motion carried The meeting was adjourned at 7.55 p.m
Respectfully Submitted,
i
Ja es P Harris
ecordmg Secretary
• C\USERS\DOC\LANDUSE\MINUTES\PCMIN05 29
#ZCA-97-1 Green River Corridor Special Interest District