HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Committees - Operations - 02/01/1990 OPERATIONS COMMITTEE MINUTES
February 1, 1990
RECEIVED
COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Christi Houser 'TH 15 1990
Paul Mann a CITY AD,.
Jon Johnson "' 'TRATION
STAFF PRESENT: Ed Chow
Jim Hansen
Tony McCarthy
Sandra Driscoll
Barney Wilson
Helen Wickstrom
Charlie Lindsey
Tom Vetsch
Becky Giles
May Miller
Sue Viseth
Becky Fowler
Teri Mertes
GUESTS PRESENT: Mia Nosler, Citizen
APPROVAL OF VOUCHERS
All claims for the period ending December 33, 1989 in the amount
of $419, 461. 30 and for January 31, 1990 in the amount of
$1, 430, 110. 92 were approved for payment. The December 33 payments
were for goods and services received in December which will be
charged against the 1989 Budget.
UTILITY CUSTOMER CONCERN
Finance Director McCarthy recapped a dispute, which was discussed
at the prior Operations Committee meeting, from a Utility Customer,
Mrs. Nosler, who is the owner of property which includes a Beauty
Shop, 2nd Hand Store and two apartments connected to the same water
meter. The dispute is related to excessive water usage from June
17 to September 12 of 1989 totalling approximately $225. McCarthy
commented that the city checked the meter in October 1989 and that
no leak could be found. There is no documentation of what caused
the high amount of water usage only speculations of possible
reasons. McCarthy stated city policy which requires documentation
of leak repair to allow adjustments to the account. The adjustment
when it is determined to be an outside leak is 50 of the excess
water usage and 100 of excess sewer usage since the water didn't
go into the sewer.
Mrs. Nosler's daughter Mia attended the meeting and stated they
have been working on this problem with the city since September
1989. Mia said they received no notice of water problems from the
tenants.
Councilmember Johnson inquired if the city could run into legal
problems if they reimburse this situation with no documentation as
to a reason why. City Attorney Driscoll responded this could be
a problem because the auditor will question the fact that the city
doesn't have a valid reason for reimbursement. Also future
inquiries by individuals in similar situations could be a problem.
Finance Director McCarthy stated that the city has had past
experience like this situation and will have more in the future.
Councilmember Mann questioned that if the city makes an exception
in this particular situation are we legally bound to follow this
policy and could we be subject to legal problems.
After some discussion back and forth about efforts to date to
resolve the dispute Councilmember Johnson moved to split the bill
1/2 city, 1/2 customer and to have future incidents be reviewed on
an individual basis. Councilmember Houser commented that if
individuals care enough to come to the Committee than the Council
Committee will hear the concern and make a decision. McCarthy
responded that this could create many cases coming before the
Committee.
The Committee recommended Johnsons motion on a 2-1 vote, with
Councilmember Mann voting no, costing the city $108 and the
adjustment showing on the Nosler' s March bill. This item will be
on the February 20 Council Agenda. In order to insure that many
requests don't come directly to the Operations Committee Finance
Director McCarthy will propose a process for review at the next
Operations Committee meeting.
TEAMSTER UNION CONTRACT APPROVAL
Personnel Analyst Fowler presented the 3 year Teamster Union
Contract agreement. Fowler discussed various aspect of the
contract including a 4% salary increase, new military leave
agreement and smoking, drug and management stipulations. She
mentioned that this contract has already been ratified by the
Teamster Union.
The Committee recommended approval by a vote of 3-0. The item will
be reviewed with the full Council at their February 6th meeting.
SALARY CHANGE FOR FIRE CHIEF
Personnel Analyst Viseth presented, as information only, 3 options
in the salary change for the Fire Chief. 1-expand range, 2-create
a new salary range, 3-put Fire Chief at Level 1 with City
Administrator. Viseth mentioned that with the complexity of the
Fire Chiefs job function that it is difficult to find comparable
positions.
Councilmember Johnson requested that interim Personnel Director
Olson attend the next Operations Committee meeting and present
options so the Committee can make a recommendation to Council .
Johnson also suggested Olson be prepared to examine the other
department head positions and the police department positions.
OPEN SPACE BOND ISSUE BUDGET
Parks Superintendent Wickstrom informed the Committee that King
County will be selling the open space bonds in April 1990. The
city can incur costs prior to the bond sale as long as the city
follows the interim financing guidelines.
Councilmember Houser inquired as to how the city knows it will get
the money from King County. Wickstrom replied that the application
was very vague and as long as we stay within guidelines of $840, 000
for Green River Corridor Trail and $850, 000 for Lake Fenwick Trail
then we are performing according to application.
Finance Director McCarthy advised setting up separate accounts for
both projects and when bonds are sold get reimbursement from King
County. To avoid arbitrage regulations King County will reimburse
as the city spends the money and not as a lump sum when they issue
bonds. The County says that the reimbursement will be within 2 or
3 days of certification of expenditure by the city.
The Committee recommended on a 3-0 vote setting up a budget for
these projects and approving the financing arrangement with the
County. The item will be scheduled for the February 20, 1990
Council meeting.
REQUEST FOR INPUT ON VENTURE FUND PROCESS
Finance Director McCarthy explained that the original procedure for
the venture fund process was to present requests to a Venture Fund
Committee of 3 senior staff and two councilmembers. McCarthy then
presented an alternative proposal having the IBC review the
proposal with a recommendation to the Operations Committee
eliminating a special committee process that may happen less than
once a year.
The Committee recommended that this new procedure be addressed at
a future Operations Committee meeting.
AQUATICS MANAGEMENT VENTURE FUND REQUEST
Finance Director McCarthy requested $1, 144 from the venture fund
budget of $10, 000 for a city employee to attend a national swimming
pool & aquatic conference in Phoenix between March 1-7 . The
request is a venture fund request because the city does not
currently operate a swimming facility or offer swimming programs,
but has over the years been requested by King County to consider
a transfer to take over these programs. If such a transfer was to
come about, it would be appropriate for city staff to have some
knowledge of swimming pool operations. The IBC has recommended
this expenditure from the venture fund.
The Committee recommended the above request to Council by a vote
of 3-0.
PRIVATE SECURITY INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
Finance Director McCarthy informed the Committee that the private
security interlocal agreement needs to be renewed. Currently the
County is responsible for licensing security guards and running
the program as opposed to individual cities which created a problem
when a security guard worked in one city and was licensed in
another.
The Committee recommended this renewal to Council by a vote of
3-0.
LID 300 PAYOFF
Finance Director McCarthy reminded the Committee that at the end
of 1989 LID 301 was paid off because the city CIP fund balance was
higher than expected. At that time it was requested that in 1990
LID 300 be reviewed and if the CIP financial position looked
favorable payoff the cities share totaling $162, 000. The 1990
budget shows an extra $359, 023 in the CIP and the payoff would save
the city $49, 000 in future interest payments.
The Committee recommended to Council by a vote of 3-0 the payoff
of LID 300.
Finance McCarthy stated that at the next Operations Committee
meeting he will give a 1989 year end financial update.
NEW MEETING DAYS AND TIME
The Committee members decided that future Operations Committee
meetings will be held on the 2nd and 4th Tuesday of the month at
4 :30pm. The next meeting will be February 13, 1990 at 4 : 30pm and
the following meeting on February 27, 1990 at 4:30pm. These new
dates will allow a week leeway before Council meetings avoiding
awkward situations when staff assumes committee will approve
issues. These set dates will also enable better public information
standardization.
Finance Director McCarthy suggested that fixed controls may need
to be established to enable checks to be sent before approval by
Council in association with current voucher time schedule.