HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Committees - Planning and Economic Development Committee - 07/21/1992 114
CITY OF �Lf!2 Js
CITY COUNCIL PLANNING COMMITTEE MINUTES
JULY 21, 1992 4:00 PM
COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT OTHER CITY STAFF
Leona Orr, Chair Tom Brubaker
Jon Johnson Roger Lubovich
Judy Woods Alana McIalwain
May Miller
PLANNING STAFF
GUESTS
Lin Ball
Jim Harris Bill Doolittle
Margaret Porter Paul Hammerschmidt
Laura Yeats-Quilici Cheryl & Jim Noble
Fred Satterstrom
WORK RELEASE
Paul Hamerschmidt explained that citizens brought this issue to the
City Council initially as a reaction to the Regional Justice Center
and because of citizen concern over the City's actions in
relationship to the Justice Center. Mr. Hammerschmidt stated he
never saw a sign posted indicating that a Justice Center was being
proposed and feels that the City is not communicating with its
citizens. Therefore, a group of citizens have created regulations
addressing heights and signage for facilities such as the justice
center or a work release center.
Planning Manager Fred Satterstrom explained that a work release
facility would be limited in size under Class III Group Homes, is
allowed by conditional use permit which requires a public
notification process, and is not permitted within residential
zones. Mr. Satterstrom further explained that City and County
officials met and it was determined that the City of Kent would
post the public notice signs for the justice center. He explained
that the City' s 41x4 ' public notice sign is used for land use
issues requiring a public hearing. Since this was a SEPA (State
Environmental Policy Act) action and a public hearing was not
required, the smaller, red laminated signs used for SEPA were
posted at the Naden and Howard Manufacturing/Northwest Metals
sites.
Chair Orr asked staff to prepare a proposal explaining what
distances are allowable, the maximum distance that can be used to
site this type of facility and whether or not those distances would
eliminate the facility from being placed within the city limits,
CITY COUNCIL PLANNING COMMITTEE MINUTES
JULY 21, 1992
PAGE 2
and a better public notification process especially for land uses
as discussed above.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT UPDATE - (F. SATTERSTROM)
Planning Manager Fred Satterstrom announced that the countywide
planning policies were adopted by the King County Council on
July 6, 1992 and became effective July 16, 1992. A group of
dissatisfied property owners intend to file a referendum and need
39,000 signatures by mid-August in order to place the referendum on
the fall ballot. The next step is for ratification of the planning
policies by 30% of the cities representing 70% of the population.
Discussion on ratification of the planning policies will be at the
Planning Committee's August 18, 1992 meeting.
The Planning Committee discussed urban growth area boundaries at
its June 16, 1992 meeting. The Committee requested that various
City departments supply information on servicing the Covington
area. Currently, information has been received from all except one
department and will be discussed at the Committee's August 4, 1992
meeting.
At the last Planning Committee meeting Planning Manager Fred
Satterstrom explained that the City of Kent is being asked to
extend the term of the Growth Management Planning Council (GMPC)
through a revised interlocal agreement which extends the duration
of the agreement until the completion of the duties of the GMPC.
The Planning Committee recommended the agreement be approved with
the addition of an expiration date of December 31, 1992 . Mr.
Satterstrom has since talked with Judy Chapman of the King County
Council staff and learned that not all GMPC duties will be
completed by December 31, for example, one of the framework
policies specifically states that the GMPC will reconvene in July
1993 to consider amendments to the countywide planning policies.
According to Ms. Chapman, the City of Kent's action to fix an
expiration date would constitute an unratified agreement which
would not be consistent with their ratification policy. Mr.
Satterstrom stated that the interlocal agreement was not placed on
the July 21, 1992 City Council agenda, and asked the Committee if
it would like to adhere to its earlier action of adding a
December 31, 1992 deadline or approve the revised interlocal
agreement as originally presented.
Council President Woods MOVED and Councilmember Johnson SECONDED a
motion to approve the revised interlocal agreement as originally
presented. Motion carried. This item will be placed on the
August 4, 1992 City Council agenda.