HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Committees - Public Works/Planning - 09/17/1991 (3) PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE
September 17, 1991
PRESENT: Jim White Carol Morris
Leona Orr Jim Hansen
Steve Dowell John Bond
Don Wickstrom Norm Angelo
Tom Brubaker Roger Lubovich
Doug Sutherland, Bruce Rayburn, Joan Crueger, Mike Sharp, Frankie
Keyes, Jack Wagner, Franklin Teter, Keith Carpenter, Bill
Doolittle, J. Scalzo, J.R. Hoffnauer, John Kiefer, William Joy,
Edward J. Pawlowski, William Carleton
Sea-Tac Sewer Service
Doug Sutherland indicated their request is to provide sewer service
to property within the boundaries of the City of Sea-Tac. He
indicated their original proposal included sizing the main such
that it could serve all of the unsewered property regardless of
whose jurisdiction it eventually becomes. Additionally, the
proposal addressed Kent Is concerns about development impacts by its
proposed design. Sea-Tac would construct the sewer system at its
expense and would need an easement to connect to Kent' s sewer stub
on 212th on the east side of the river. Mr. Sutherland stated they
have been working on this request for some time and would like to
be able to move ahead. Wickstrom clarified that Kent would not be
granting an easement for their connection but a franchise which can
have a duration as well as set conditions. Dowell raised questions
about the area to be served by Sea-Tac as well as the zoning of the
area. Wickstrom clarified that the first step was to determine
whether Committee is willing to allow service. The next step would
be to identify what conditions should be tied to the service. Orr
asked that since it appears the line would run through the 392
acres that is currently in the County, would that allow the County
to develop the property using the sewer. Wickstrom stated the
franchise could be conditioned to servicing the existing boundaries
within the City limits of Sea-Tac with any future expansion, either
outside its boundaries or to newly annexed areas, subject to
renegotiation of the franchise. Wickstrom confirmed for Dowell
that the engineering of the project is feasible. Dowell stated he
felt that the Public Works Department would be working on the
engineering end of this but it seems the people who do the planning
for the City of Kent would be the ones to make the determination
whether to even consider it. Carol Morris expressed concerns about
whether conditions on the franchise by which Sea-Tac would restrict
itself from providing services would be enforceable. She indicated
she would like to research the matter. Leona Orr indicated the
Public Works Committee
September 17, 1991
Page 2
Planning Committee has briefly discussed the request but there have
been concerns raised about how to mitigate the impact to the City
if development is opened up in this area. Dowell stated that if
this is feasible from an engineering standpoint he would have no
problem sending this to the Council for a decision but he felt that
the Planning Committee should be reviewing it first. Orr stated
that it appears this will be a very expensive project to construct
and that doing so for one development does not make economical
sense and she feels that other development will have to occur to
help offset the expense and that could have negative impacts on the
City. Jim White stated he thought that the last time this was
discussed that Administration was asked to develop further
information on the request. Jim Hansen stated that Sea-Tac had
asked to split the issues and address only the sewer connection
request. Hansen stated he felt the issues were inseparable
particularly given the planning implications in two areas - one,
the potential density to support the costs and the other is a
potential contradiction of Council' s 1963 agricultural land policy.
Dowell suggested that the Public Works Committee recognize that
the project is feasible from an engineering standpoint. Orr stated
she would support such a motion with the condition that this is in
no way a recommendation for approval of this extension. After
further discussion,- Dowell moved to approve the engineering concept
of the project, and the engineering concept only, to the Council
for the October 1 meeting. The Committee unanimously approved the
motion.
Assistance with Side Sewer Repair
Mrs. Crueger addressed the Committee concerning a side sewer repair
she had to make to her rental property. She asked for assistance
with the cost of the repair since the break in the side sewer was
under the street. The repair of the side sewer required cutting
the road and restoring it. Mrs. Crueger indicated the cost for the
total repair was $5, 637. She indicated that the rest of the street
is in poor repair. Wickstrom explained that the property owner is
responsible for repair of the side sewer up to the main, including
the tee. Carol Morris and Tom Brubaker clarified that the property
owner has fee title to the property to the middle of the street and
the City has an easement for street purposes so the side sewer is
still on her property. With the existing City ordinance which
requires the property owner to repair the side sewer up to the
main, there is no way we can offer financial assistance without it
being construed as a gift of public funds for private purposes.