HomeMy WebLinkAboutPW14-118 - Change Order - #1 - Tapani, Inc. - Briscoe Desimone Levee Improvements Reach 2 & 3 - 08/11/2014 Records 4}}� ` �eme
r
KE O T
'
WASNINOTON Document
�f£.t��
CONTRACT COVER SHEET
This is to be completed by the Contract Manager prior to submission
to City Clerks Office. All portions are to be completed.
If you have questions, please contact City Clerk's Office.
Vendor Name: Tapani, Inc.
i
Vendor Number:
JD Edwards Number
Contract Number: PW14-118
This is assigned by City Clerk's Office
Project Name: Briscoe DesimoneLevee Improvements Reach 2 and 3
Description: ❑ Interlocal Agreement ® Change Order ❑ Amendment ❑ Contract
❑ Other: #1
Contract Effective Date: 1/30/2014 Termination Date: 12/31/2014
Contract Renewal Notice (Days):
Number of days required notice for termination or renewal or amendment
Contract Manager: K. Langholz Department: PUBLIC WORKS
Detail: (i.e. address, location, parcel number, tax id, etc.):
S:Public\RecordsManagement\forms\ContractCover\adcc7832 1 11/08
i
•
wws Hxc.oH i
CHANGE ORDER NO. # 1
NAME OF CONTRACTOR: Tapani, Inc. ("Contractor")
CONTRACT NAME & PROJECT NUMBER: Briscoe DesimoneLevee Improvements Reach 2 and 3
ORIGINAL CONTRACT DATE: January 30, 2014
This Change Order amends the above-referenced contract; all other provisions of the
contract that are not inconsistent with this Change Order shall remain in effect. For valuable
consideration and by mutual consent of the parties, the project contract is modified as follows:
1. Section I of the Agreement, entitled "Description of Work," is hereby modified to
add additional work or revise existing work as follows:
In addition to work required under the original Agreement and any
prior Amendments, Contractor shall provide all labor, materials, and
equipment necessary to:
Place 3' wide cap beam in lieu of 27' cap beam, including additional
rebar and concrete due to underground obstructions the sheet pile
alignment shifted requiring a larger cap beam on top of the piles.
2. The contract amount and time for performance provisions of Section II "Time of
Completion," and Section III, "Compensation," are hereby modified as follows`.
Original Contract Sum, $6,709,555.56
(including applicable alternates and
WSST)
Net Change by Previous Change Orders $0.00
(incl. applicable WSST)
Current Contract Amount $6,709,555.56
(incl. Previous Change Orders)
Current Change Order $50,000
Applicable WSST Tax on this Change $4,750
Order
Revised Contract Sum $6,764,305.56
CHANGE ORDER - 1 OF 3
is
Original Time for Completion 200worldng days
(insert date)
Revised Time for Completion under 200 working days
prior Change Orders
(insert date)
Days Required (f) for this Change 0 calendar days
Order
Revised Time for Completion 200workingdays
(insert date)
In accordance with Sections 1-04.4 and 1-04.5 of the Kent and WSD"OT Standard
Specifications, and Section VII of the Agreement, the Contractor accepts all requirements of this
Change Order by signing below. Also, pursuant to the above-referenced contract, Contractor
agrees to waive any protest it may have regarding this Change Order and acknowledges and
accepts that this Change Order constitutes final settlement of all claims of any kind or nature
arising. from or connected with any work either covered or affected by this Change Order,
including, without limitation, claims related to contract time, contract acceleration, onsite or
home office overhead, or lost profits. This Change Order, unless otherwise provided, does not
relieve the Contractor from strict compliance with the guarantee and warranty provisions of the
original contract, particularly those pertaining to substantial completion date.
All acts consistent with the authority of the Agreement, previous Change Orders (if any),
and this Change Order, prior to the effective date of this Change Order, are hereby ratified and
affirmed, and the terms of the Agreement, previous Change Orders (if any), and this Change
Order shall be deemed to have applied.
The parties whose names appear below swear under penalty of perjury that they are
authorized to enter into this contract modification, which is binding on the parties of this
contract.
3. The Contractor will adjust the amount of its performance bond (if any) for this
project to be consistent with the revised contract sum shown in section 2, above.
IN WITNESS, the parties below have executed this Agreement, which will
become effective on the last date written below.
0�
CONTRACTOR: CITY OF KENT:
By: f� �' A7lr"°t By:
(si r�e) (�. e (signature
Print Name: LA 'i �tCtbCI;4�r Print Narjlg� w
Its Its 7k 41(L L. 10 V AS pi
(title)
DATE: (1��f I DATE:
CHANGE ORDER - 2 OF 3
® T FILE NO: 200.2
KEP
o. CHANGE ORDER WORKSHEET NO. 1
Construction Management Division - Public Works
Project: Briscoe-Desimone Levee Improve Project No.: 09-3010
Project Engineer: Ken Langholz Fed-Aid No.: N/A
Owners Rep: Jason Bryant Contractor: Tapani Inc
Date: 8/6/2014
I. PROPOSED CHANGE
Place 3' wide concrete cap beam in lieu of 27' cap beam including additional rebar and concrete
II. REASON AND BACKGROUND FOR CHANGE
Due to underground obstructions sheet pile alignment shifted requiring a larger cap beam on top
of the piles.Total change order agreed upon is $50,000 negotiated down from $76,000. This
change order will cover Reach 2 for a total of $14,800, The remaining $35,200 will be paid at a
later date to cover Reach 3.
III. METHOD OF PAYMENT
NEW PAY ITEM(S) ® Not Applicable
Change Order No. _ FOR ACCOUNTING USE ONLY
Sch. No. Item Description I Total Est. Qty this Unit Unit Price Total Estimated Cost of
Qty PE Item
l i
-.
6 _ Concrete
.cap Beam _ - 1 _ 1 FA_ $14,800 00- _ _ $50,000 00
Independent Estimate Attached CREATE PAY ITEM ONLY— Payment to be made ® PAY THIS PAY ESTIMATE
____ _REQUIRED Lot a later date u�o_n_completion of work !___l________
j Material Submittals Required — CC: Construction Coordinator ( New Sub Recird? I No
DELETE EXISTING PAY ITEM(S) per 1-09.5 ® Not Applicable
Change Order No. _ ( FOR ACCOUNTING USE ONLY
Sch. No. B.I. No, Item Description Qty Unit Unit Price Cost of Item
_ - - --� ..-_ _.------
❑ Independent Estimate Attached -REQUIRED i ❑
INCREASE/DECREASE TO EXISTING PAY ITEM(S) ® Not Applicable
Change Order No. - FOR ACCOUNTING USE ONLY
Sch No - B.I. No. Item Description -� Qty unit_ Unit Price Cost of Item
1 I
1 REV, DATE: 4/01/10
® T FILE NO: 200.2
ECEN
Independent Estimate Attached - REQUIRED i El 1
TOTAL ESTIMATED COST OF CHANGE ORDER $50,000.00
*Total of the Cost of Item Columns
THIS PAY ESTIMATE 14 800.00
IV. WORKING DAYS
Original Contract],200 Due This Change Order* 10 Previous Total 1 200
r ---- _.. ....—
_DATE 18/6L2010 _...__ ....--- - _DATE:
* J Ex lanation Justification Required:'Oncr7itffcWlpath for levee completion
TOTAL WORKING DAYS* 200
*This Change Order + Previous Total
All work, materials and measurements to be in accordance with the Standard Specifications
and Contract Special Provisions for the type of work described.
Prepared By: \ ` Date: �3 /
'J son Bryau-
Construction Supervisor: Date:
P
1 ul Ku ne
Construction Manager: f Date:
'i
l
i
I
2 REV. DATE: 4/01/10
FILE 200.2
K E N T CHANGE ORDER WORKSREVET
Date of change order: /l f5 Date worked performed: Glg«fY
Concurrence/Approval (Inds&Date): Construction Supervisor Construction Manage
Project Name: / rc��' ✓��s:s�r,; a G v�r_ tom.-Project Number: C�f� S moils
J
Contractor:
C.O. Type/Bid Item#: Force Account(est. total) $ Lump Sum$
Schedule#: o Change Order#: -
Ordered By: Engineer 9 � T/ % Contractor
Description of Work:
I
Reason:
�'//e-', d>'!/G'i,�.tzcr%/'r CfI'7�rG�<X i�/3 C6'G!/'•-,/Ea c3 /��2' fr.9ZG`<°./<- _
����z�'� /✓/C���- Gcc,'�%"�cn.:,y� ��'.�c��t_ f;.S' ��� c'F'G `� ,2��'U>�J-�-�J
F
COST ESTIMATE
r}'J _ yl�
QUANTITY PRICE UNIT(S) ESTIMATEDTOTAL
ACTUAL COST
QUANTITY PRICE UNIT(S) ACTUALTOTAL
TIME
Extension Of Contract Time Due To This Change Order-------------------Calendar/Working Days
COMMENTS
_�� 1l� f��-fit=-`i=�.icy�c-' �� r`"�r •I f/'.v/f �'- �iz-, i}
Posted by:. Dale: >- Checked by:, Date: /_i/ f Pay Estimate# 1
PdChwkOutlCansWclionlFomss-Public Pmjcc6lPzy Eslimalc Fom¢1Changc Ordcr 1Vor}shecLdoc
Rev:5121103
P.G.Box 1996
TAPA 1 "���s Battle Ground,WA 98604
P
! ROU y INC. Main Office (360)657-1148
Main Office (Fax)687-6748
Change Order Request
Project Name: Briscoe Desimone Levee Improvements(CONCRETE) Date 6 7l20 4
Contract No: 0
TUI Job No. 0
TUI.No. 1
Owner No, 0
General No. 0
Description: Widening of Reach 2 Cap Beam to 3'
"Please note that if the shoring formwork has to change to accomadate the additional
concrete,this proposal is void" Please see notes below
Lu'xM1 '� �tab9r�-< Unit Rate Quantity Unil Total
Tapani Labor µ $ 376.24 23 CY $ 8,663.52
$ 0 $ -
$ 0 $ -
Labor Sub Total $ 8,653.52
29% Markup $ 2,509.52
0% Small Tools $ -
TotalLaborHours 23
manviq ESjulpmetlt - Unit Rate Quantity Unit Total
Tapani Equipment $ 15.84 23 CY $ 364.32
Equipment Sub Total $ 364.32
7771
° Mark-Up $ 61.93
-- ra1r€ iTa Metefla 1"E I�Vtz i✓Hpk 1 i£3. Unit Rate Quantity Unit Total
Tapani Materials $ 105.05 23 CY S 2,416.15
$ 0 $
Material Sub Total S 2.416.15
17 ° Mark-Up $ 410.75
I'�"..- r Ub-CdhtfaCt3r5 ."—'_' Unit Rate Quantity Unit Tend
Subcontractors Concrete pumping,rebar Instalia[ion. $ 221.32 23 CY $ 5,090.36
$ 0 $
Sub Contractors Sub Total $ 5,090.36
12% Mark-Up $ 610.84
Unit Rate Quantity Unit Total J
Construction Expenses,(rentals,etc.) T $ 31.02 23 CY $ 713.46
$ - 0 $
$ 0 $
$ - 0 Misc.Total $ 713,46
17°o Mark-Up $ 121.29
Notes
Please note that this change order does not include the cost of the reinforcing steel that was already cut as we have not received the
pricing from our supplier yet.Also,Tapanis shoring design is being reviewed by a structural Engineer and we will have an answer shortly
If It is adequate to incorporate the additional concrete.The cost of the Engineering and rebar will be included on a separate change order
as we obtain pricing from both the supplier and Engineer.The rebar cost is roughly estimated at$4,500,and the Engineering is$750.00.
Lastly,this price is not for fixing the problem of the z pile clearance Issues,it is strictly a price to increase the Cap beam width on both
reaches by 5". This change order pricing was created by taking our total cost per cubic yard$352,255.58 and dividing the total of each
cost type into the additional cubic yards requested.A more detailed proposal was avoided due to the time restraints and the Impact this
delay could have on the project.As noted in the description, if the shoring formwork is not adequate to incorporate the change,this
pricing is void and Tapani will issue a new proposal.As of now,this sounds like a small possibility, Please call with any questions.
This Change increases the time to complete the project by: 0 Day(s)
We reserve the right to claim cost and/or schedule impacts at later date Total Cost $ 17,237.81
Overhead $Sub Total $ 20,952.14
General Liability Insurance $
Bond $ - lit
Total Amount $ 20,952.14
NOTE:THIS CHANGE ORDER REQUEST SHALL DE ACCEPTED AS APPROVED AND INCORPORATED INTO THE CONTRACT UNLESS III
WE RECEIVE A WRITTEN RESPONSE FROM YOU STATING OTHERWISE WITHIN 4s HOURS(WE WOULD PREFER THIS CHANGE
ORDER REQUEST FORM TO RE SIGNED AND RETURNED). )
SHEARER DESIGN LLC.
Bridge Design, Construction Engineering and Infrastructure Aesthetics
3613 Phinney Ave N#B
Seattle,WA 98103
(206)781-7830
Briscoe-Desimone Levee Improvements
Reach 2 & Reach 3
Construction Support Memo 007
June 12, 2014
To: Justin McClellan, Tapani
Subject:Concrete Cap Beam
Based on discussions in the field, the width of the concrete cap beam will be modified to 3'-0",
This will accommodate deviations in the as-build pile installations to date. See the attached
sketch.
Note the driving placement tolerances in the contract shall remain unchanged.
The Engineer shall be contacted when there are extreme pile location deviations that cannot
provide the minimum cover requirements and be captured inside this modified cap width
Forming of the cap and barrier shall match the horizontal geometry in the plans. Any
modifications shall be approved by the Engineer and provide the best fit to the as-installed pile
line with adjustments for the minimum clearances shown on the revised sketch. The final
appearance shall provide controlled large radius sweep lines with no angle points or reverse
curves for a clean smooth appearance.
The modified width cap beam shall be used on all sections of the project in Reach 2 and Reach 3.
All other details in regards to the barrier, architectural reveal, surface treatment and handrail are
to remain unchanged.
Note this modified cap does not include a remedy to cover the pile lifting holes, pending a
proposal from Tapani
Changes to the cap beam at the ramp are currently being evaluated and will be forth coming.
David R. Shearer S.E.
SHEARER DESIGN
i
6/17/2014
i
! a
-�
\ , �
\ Z10
e
Ig
/ \ ~
^ / �
:
r. �
\r 5 -
° i
{ 2 < ^ ~
i
TAPANI, INC.
PO Box 1900 a 1904 SE 61h Place ® Battle Ground, WA 98604
(360) 687-1148 a (360) 687-7968 FAX
PROJECT: Briscoe Desimone DATE: 6/17/2014
TO: Jason Bryant
FROM: Tyler Miller, Project Manager
Tapani Underground, Inc.
I
Subject: Project Delays
Dear Mr. Bryant,
Per specification section 1-08.6 Tapani is required to submit a written notice of any
delays within 10 calendar days.
Tapani wishes to make sure with this letter, that everyone is made aware of the cost
and delays that are coming from these late changes to the cap beam being unsettled, a
result of the z pile installers hitting obstructions. The original schedule had Tapani's
welders and laborers starting onsite 6/12/14 to start welding and installing bridge
brackets for the cap beam shoring. This schedule also had the concrete crew starting
on 6/16/14 installing rebar and edge form. During a site visit on 6/10/14 Tapanis
concrete crew noticed that some of the z pile was driven to far from design for the
original cap beam design to work. On 6/12/14 during the onsite meeting it was
discussed with the project Engineers and a method of widening the cap beam to Y was
decided on as the method to fix the issues and Tapani was directed to put together
pricing. At this time the rebar supply was shut down, and the custom snap ties with a 1
week lead time production was shut down. On 6/17/14 Tapani was made aware from
the field foreman that the cap beam was going back to the original design and z pile
would be corrected. At this time Tapani does not have a lead time on getting rebar
production started and shipped to project. The snap ties for the forming of the cap
beam are a week out. This is a total of 9 days lost, if the rebar can be fabricated and
delivered within a week. The cost's will be in the Engineering of the shoring to make
sure it would accommodate the extra width of cap beam, cost of the rebar supply
production being shut down and started up again, and possible loss of days to Tapani
and loss in production. There is no estimate for these cost and will be submitted as
made available.
At time of this letter completion we again received notice from the field that the cap
beam will be going back to the Y wide design. Tapani will put full effort into keeping
this issue as small as possible. Also, Tapani Inc. feels that Jason Bryant has put full
effort into resolving this issue and is greatly appreciated while reducing the cost
tremendously.
Regards,
Tyler Miller
Tapani, Inc.
Project Manager
360.518,8725
I
I
paaa 7 of
Bryant, Jason
From: Bryant,Jason
Sent: Friday,June 13, 2014 10:10 AM
To: Barry, Jason
Subject: FW: Concrete cap beam revision
Jason,
I'm waiting on decision about keeping the sheets on Reach 3 2" high. I have been calling Ken
and leaving messages this morning but haven't heard back. I'm off today but I have my phone
with me. If you hear anything could you please let me know.
Thank you,
Jason Bryant, Owners Representative
Construction Management I Public Works Department
220 Fourth Avenue South, Kent, WA 98032
,ifig. - Phone 253-856-5541 1 Cell 253-261-5663
KENT
ibrvantCaKentWA.gov
n,c....o+a. www.KentWA.gov
P!SASE CONSIDER THE u.vzRoisRi3rdT 6EFOCH PRINTING THIS E-MAIL
From: Bryant, Jason
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2014 10:04 AM
To: Langholz, Ken
Cc: Nickerson, Jim <JNickerson@geiconsultants.com> (JNickerson@geiconsultants.com); Bieren, Chad
Subject: RE: Concrete cap beam revision
Ken,
We are wanting to raise the sheets on Reach 3 not on Reach 2. As for Reach 2 we will have to
weld the holes up or lower the cap beam. We need to make a decision within the next hour or
so. Axis crane will be done with Reach 2 soon and will began moving over to Reach 3. Let me
know what we want to do ASAP. Calling my cell phone is the best way to get a hold of me today.
Thank you,
Jason Bryant, Owners Representative
Construction Management I Public Works
�1�. Department
220 Fourth Avenue South, Kent, WA 98032
i'.
": .
'dam Phone 253-856-5541 Cell 253-261-5663
fl-q;- - ibryant@KentWA.Qo
www.KentWA.aov
PL",, E CvNSMER THE`J,:b ONMENT LEVcRH PRInY?idG
THF'E-111A L
1
From: Langholz, Ken
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2014 9:31 AM
To: 'Pujol, Alberto'; Nickerson,Jim
Cc: David Shearer(david@shearerdesign.net); Miyamoto, Cory; Bryant, Jason; Walton, Randy
Subject: RE: Concrete cap beam revision
Alberto,
We haven't received a formal request from Tapani. We would not allow the top to be lowered, so they would need to
pull the sheets up. Doesn't sound like a good proposition to me.
Ken
From: Pujol, Alberto [mailto:APuiol@geiconsultants.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2014 6:00 PM
To: Langholz, Ken; Nickerson, Jim
Cc: David Shearer (david@shearerdesign.net); Miyamoto, Cory; Bryant,Jason; Walton, Randy
Subject: RE: Concrete cap beam revision
Ken,
I'm not sure I understand your third paragraph. Does it refer to the sheets already in the ground? Is the proposal to
actually pull the sheets out of the ground 1.5 inches?Or lower the cap beam by 1.5 inches? If the latter, it would lower
the top of the flood wall by 1.5 inches.
From: Langholz, Ken [mailto:KLangholz@kentwa.gov]
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2014 5:39 PM
To: Nickerson, Jim
Cc: David Shearer (david@shearerdesign.net); Miyamoto, Cory; Bryant,Jason; Walton, Randy; Howlett, Mark; Bieren,
Chad; Pujol, Alberto
Subject: Concrete cap beam revision
.Jim,
As you are aware, there are some sheet piles that are a few inches out of alignment on Reach 2. We had the piles
surveyed this afternoon and should have the information plotted tomorrow morning. On site, we stretched a line across
the worst area which was from approx. sheet no, 68 to 88. Some piles were 5" riverward of the line, a couple were 3"
landward and two were more than 6" landward of the line. Tapani will attempt to straighten the 2 pair of piles that are
more than 6" out of alignment because they would cause the overhang to be over a foot in adjacent piles.
After much discussion, it was determined that the best solution would be to go back to the T-0" wide cap beam. If we
allow a minimum of 4" and a maximum of 10" overhang on the landward side it would keep the cap beam and barrier in
alignment with no reverse curves. The desired overhang would still be 6.5" as currently shown on sheet S1 and would
be the dimension used for staking. This wider cap beam will allow for the deviations in the wall location that we're
experiencing on this project,
We've also received a request from Tapani to raise the sheets by 1.5" so that the holes will be covered by the 18" deep
cap beam. That would change the 9" dimension from the top of pile to top of cap beam to 7.5". In discussions that we
had previously, there was concern that the lower cover would cause reflective cracking, Please take a look at this.
I am requesting you to revise the details on sheet 51 as noted above. Also, incorporate the Revision 1 dimensions to the
extent possible. The asphalt trail dimension shown on sheet 2 will change to 12'-0" so there will be no noticeable
change in the grading plans. Please call or email if you have any questions. Thanks,
2
Ken Langho1z, Engineering Supervisor
Design Engineering I Public Works Department
220 Fourth Avenue South, Kent, WA 98032
Phone 253-856-5516
W�RHxq cex
klangholz@ KentWA.gov
www.KentWA.gov
PL.f,SL CrONSUAR THe ENV!RONME NIT IFrORE.PRI[dT-NG THIS E-MAIL
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE The information in this transmittal(including attachments,if any)may be privileged and confidential and is intended only for the
recipient(s)listed above.Any reviow,use,disclosure,distribution or copying of this transmittal,in any form,is prohibited except by or on behalf of the intended
recipient. If you have received this transmittal in error,please notify me immediately by reply email and destroy all copies of the ransmit al.
3
I`
Project Briscoe Levee Reach 2 & 3 Project# 09-3010
Date 6/19/2014 Workable Day Of the Week Thursday
Weather:AM Sunny
Weather: PM Sunny
Contractor Tapani, Inc. ❑ Submit Representative 0
Location and Type of Work
Bid Item# Description Location Quantity Units
LOOS Clearing&Grubbing l Reach 2 0.11111 ILS
--F---
10050 Clearin Grubbing_ _ g& u
_ _ 9 � Reach 3 _ � 0.11111 FL-SS..
__ _
10600 Levee Excavation Including Haul &Disposal Reach3 Sta 10+00 to Sta 23+DO 1838 CY
ii0050 Sheet Piling-Wall Type A(AZ19-700) Reach 3 Sta 11+58 to Sta 12+45 3752.75 SF
-Removing 3 FA
,obstructions or Construction Modifcatio 7-17 _ 0.003800 [Sheet Piling3 FA
60500 Sheet Piling -Removing obstructions or Construction ModiFcatio T-10 ,_ IF 0.011 FA
60s00 Sheet Piling-Removing Obstructions or Construction Modifica ]IA-18 0.0 007 FA
Contractor's Active Men and Equipment
Ryan Nelson: Forman, Brandon Luelling, Mike Cabrera & Kyle Pete: Equipment Operator, Josh Wisenborn: General Laborer,
Dean Muonio: Concrete Foreman, Gary McElroy: Carpenter/Labor, Neal McWilliams &Tyler Homola,Two Excavator, Water
Truck, one rubber tire loader, one 5yrd dump truck, 700 Dozer, Roller w/sheep foot,Axis Crane; Pat Mahoney: Project
Manager, Larry Lindborg: Crane Operator, Dave Lund: Oiler, Charles Escoffom (Skip): Pile Buck Forman,James Dill (JJ): Pile
Buck/Welder,Tyler Kemper: Pile Buck, 100 Ton Manitowoc Crane(308),Jason Engineering:Josh, Geo Engineering: Emily
Contractor's Inactive Equipment
Diary
Tapani began @ Earn. Upon arrival Tapani continued hauling Levee embankment to Reach 2 from Reach 3. Fill was placed and
compacted. Chris from Geo was on site testing compaction. Lyle Stone from Geo also visited the site and agreed all material
placed was frim and unyielding.Axis crane began @ 6am. Upon arrival Axis continued driving steel sheets on Reach 3, During
placement no obstructions were found. Axis has switched to a staggered driving stlye thruout Reach 3. @ Sam Inspector
spoke with Ryan from Tapani. Ryan and Inspector agreed on a $50,000.00 additional payment for the 3' cap beam. This cost
was based on a $55,000 estimate from Tyler @ Tapani. Ryan agreed. Inspector held weekly meeting and settlement was
discussed. It was agreed upon by the City and Tapani to make the cap beam 3' wide on both Reach 2 and 3.It was also
discussed on how to make sure Reach 3 alignment can be controlled . It was agreed upon to place stakes on 25' stations
regardless of critical points. Axis agreed. Tapani began wedling holes adnstuds on Reach 2. Dave and Neal agreed on time(see
report below). Clean up began @ 6pm.
: Reach 2 Continues with layout of Concrete forms and Welders have moved in and starting studs with 6/19Force Account @
300 minutes for plugging 30 holes, Day 2 of 8 week Preload countdown for R-3 parking lot ramp, 62nd & 190th Street has
quarry spalls getting out of sight because of haul out, Removal of R-3 Levee continues, cutting of holes in sheet piles was
agreed @ 5minutes per pair that should = 42.08 hours, R-3 Item 6005 is 30sheets 84.98'x 43' =3654sgft station 11+58-
12.43.49, obstructions hit @ sheet 59,60 with 43" high, R-2 grading stripping's on landside of levee wall, Took Jared and Pat
over to Reach 1, Tapani dragging 50' sheet piles from R2 to R-3 through trail section