HomeMy WebLinkAboutPW15-246 - Original - RL Alia Company - Change Order - 7/16/15 1 1 1
1 1 1
Records Mlanagem ,ent� ,".
W f.5M1110TON DOClvll 1Ie1 I l
CONTRACT COVER SHEET
E
This is to be completed by the Contract Manager prior to submission
to City Clerks Office. All portions are to be completed.
If you have questions, please contact City Clerk's Office.
Vendor Name: RL Alia Company
Vendor Number:
JD Edwards Number
Contract Number: PW 15-246 - OCG ?
This is assigned by City Clerk's Office
Project Name: W Gowe St-4th Ave S to 6th Ave S Drainage
i
Description: ❑ Interlocal Agreement ® Change Order ❑ Amendment ❑ Contract
❑ Other:
Contract Effective Date: 7/16/2015 Termination Date:
Contract Renewal Notice (Days):
Number of days required notice for termination or renewal or amendment
Contract Manager: Paul Kuehne Department: PW Engineering
Contract Amount: $312 030.00 + tax $29,642.85 = $341,672.85
Approval Authority: (CIRCLE ONE) Department Director Mayor City Council
Detail: (i.e. address, location, parcel number, tax id, etc.):
Change Order#1
I,
As of: 08/27/14
i 7 1
RENT
CHANGE ORDER NO. 1
NAME OF CONTRACTOR: RL Alia Company ("Contractor")
CONTRACT NAME & PROJECT NUMBER: W Gowe Street-4th Ave S to 6th Ave S Drainage
ORIGINAL CONTRACT DATE: July 16, 2015
This Change Order amends the above-referenced contract; all other provisions of the
contract that are not inconsistent with this Change Order shall remain in effect. For valuable
consideration and by mutual consent of the parties, the project contract is modified as follows:
1. Section I of the Agreement, entitled "Description of Work," is hereby modified to
add additional work or revise existing work as follows:
In addition to work required under the original Agreement and any
prior Amendments, Contractor shall provide all labor, materials, and
equipment necessary to:
Road restoration utilizing overlay paving instead of inlay paving due to
the cost to pave inlay patch became near equal to the cost to repair
the road using full width overlay.
2. The contract amount and time for performance provisions of Section II "Time of
Completion," and Section III,"Compensation," are hereby modified as follows:
Original Contract Sum, $341,672.85
(including applicable alternates and
WSST)
Net Change by Previous Change Orders $0.00
(incl. applicable WSST)
Current Contract Amount $341,672.85
(incl. Previous Change Orders)
Current Change Order $1,299.87
Applicable WSST Tax on this Change $0.00
Order
Revised Contract Sum $342,972.72
CHANGE ORDER - 1 OF 3
i
Original Time for Completion 45 working days
(insert date)
Revised Time for Completion under 45 working days
prior Change Orders
(insert date)
Days Required (f) for this Change 0 calendar days
Order
Revised Time for Completion 45 working days
(insert date)
In accordance with Sections 1-04.4 and 1-04.5 of the Kent and WSDOT Standard
Specifications, and Section VII of the Agreement, the Contractor accepts all requirements of this
Change Order by signing below. Also, pursuant to the above-referenced contract, Contractor
agrees to waive any protest it may have regarding this Change Order and acknowledges and
accepts that this Change Order constitutes final settlement of all claims of any kind or nature
arising from or connected with any work either covered or affected by this Change Order,
including, without limitation, claims related to contract time, contract acceleration, onsite or
home office overhead, or lost profits. This Change Order, unless otherwise provided, does not
relieve the Contractor from strict compliance with the guarantee and warranty provisions of the
original contract, particularly those pertaining to substantial completion date.
All acts consistent with the authority of the Agreement, previous Change Orders (if any),
and this Change Order, prior to the effective date of this Change Order, are hereby ratified and
affirmed, and the terms of the Agreement, previous Change Orders (if any), and this Change
Order shall be deemed to have applied.
The parties whose names appear below swear under penalty of perjury that they are
authorized to enter into this contract modification, which is binding on the parties of this
contract.
3. The Contractor will adjust the amount of its performance bond (if any) for this
project to be consistent with the revised contract sum shown in section 2, above.
IN WITNESS, the parties below have executed this Agreement, which will
become effective on the last date written below.
CONTRACTOR: CITY OP KEW .
j f
By: 1,��LI- f� By: f✓°w.� +
(si nature) (signature)
Print Name: Print Name: GsiAn &ca>Enk
Its Its CITY 15MIXaEF9
^(title) (title)
r
DATE: ,;tt et- v' 'u t DATE: ldlaldS
CHANGE ORDER - 2 OF 3
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
(applicable if Mayor's signature required)
Kent Law Department
i
[In this field,you may enter the eleetrorou filepath where the eontraR has been saved]
I
I
CHANGE ORDER 3 OF 3
® T FILE NO: 200.2
o. CHANGE ORDER WORKSHEET NO. I
Construction Management Division - Public Works
Project: Gowe St. - 4n' to 6th Drianage Project No.: 15-3004
Project Engineer: Paul Kuehne Fed-Aid No.:
Owners Rep, Paul Kuehne Contractor: R. L. Alta Company
Date: 10/06/2015
I. PROPOSED CHANGE
Road restoration utilizing overlay paving instead of inlay paving.
II. REASON AND BACKGROUND FOR CHANGE
An opportunity presented itself as the cost to pave inlay patch became near equal to the cost to
repair the road using full width overlay. In this instance overlay paving will provide the City with
a like new road surface for almost the same cost. Paving at Contract unit bid pricing.
III. METHOD OF PAYMENT
NEW PAY ITEMI(S) ❑ Not Applicable
Change Order No. - FOR ACCOUNTING USE ONLY
Sch. No. Item Description Total Est. Qty this Unit Unit Price Total Estimated Cost of
j Qty I PE I Item
_--- __- _- —.- ----- -------J. .------- -------------
1 1 1100B 360 Tons $143.00 $51,480.00
HMA For Full Width Overlay
i I �
Independent Estimate Attached CREATE FyAY ITEM ONLY Payment to be made PAY THIS PAY ESTIMATE
REQUIRED ; at a later date upon compledon_of work
_ -.-.--.. .-.-- __-__
❑ Material Submittals Required - CC: Construction Coordinator New Sub Reqrd? No
DELETE EXISTING PAY ITENi(S) per 1-09.5 ® Not Applicable
Change Order No. _ FOR ACCOUNTING USE ONLY
Sch No B.I. No. I Item Description 1 Qty Unit l Unit Price Cost of Item
-_ __- .-1-- ------- ----. .. .----- ------ ------ -------__... . .--
I
I _
Independent Estimate Attached - REQUIRED ❑
INCIRCA,SE/DECREASE TO EXISTING PAY ITEM(S) NotApplr'cable
Cshangee Order
No.. -- Item- T- — ( ' FOR ACCOUNTING USE ONLY
m Description Qty Unit Unit Price Cost of Item
Tonsi $143 DO ($48,620 00)
- 1 1100 JHMA ForInlay 340
1 REV. DATE: 4/01/10
i
i
�' T FILE NO: 200.2
Independent Estimate Attached - REQUIRED
TOTAL ESTIMATED COST OF CHANGE ORDER * 1 $0.00
*Total of the Cost of Item Columns
THIS PAY ESTIMATE �0
IV. WORKING DAYS
Original Contract 1_45 i_Due This Change Order* 0 Previous Total 145
DATE - _ _-- ._.---
DATE
* � Ex lanation Justification Re wired:
TOTAL WORKING DAYS* �— 0
*This Change Order + Previous Total
All work, materials and measurements to be in accordance with the Standard Specifications
and Contract Special Provisions for the type of work described.
Prepared By: S t ` Date:
Construction Supervisor: I f E c _.� t.: Date: j
Construction Manager: Date:
I,
2 REV, LATE- 4/01/10
Public Works Committee Minutes
August 17, 2015
Item 1 - Call to Order: The meeting was called to order at 4:01 p.m. by Committee Chair,
Dennis Higgins,
Item 2 - Roll Call: Committee members present: Higgins Ralph and Fincher were present.
Item 3 - Changes to the Agenda: There were no changes to the agenda.
Item 4 - Approval of Meeting Minutes Dated August 3, 2015:
Committee member Fincher MOVED to approve the minutes of August 3, 2015. The
motion was SECONDED by Committee member Ralph and PASSED 3 - 0.
Item 5 -Consultant Agreement with GEI for Construction Support for Briscoe-Desimone
Reach 4:
Kelly Casteel, Design Engineering Supervisor briefly touched on where the Briscoe-Desimone
Levee is located and provided a brief funding history.
Casteel went on to note that the City is continuing to pursue accreditation of the Briscoe-
Desimone Levee from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). As part of this
accreditation effort, the City prepared a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) which
identified 4 areas, or reaches, of the levee that do not meet current FEMA standards. These areas
will be repaired utilizing sheet piles to construct a secondary floodwall.
At the August 4, 2015 Council meeting, the construction contract for Reach 4 was awarded to
Razz Construction. Under this consultant services agreement, GEI will provide construction
engineering support for Reach 4.
Committee Member Ralph MOVED to recommend Council authorize the Mayor to sign a
Consultant Services Agreement with GEI Consultants, Inc. in an amount not to exceed
$47,688 to provide engineering services for the Briscoe-Desimone Levee Reach 4
project, subject to final terms and conditions acceptable to the City Attorney and Public
Works Director. The motion was SECONDED by Committee member Fincher and PASSED
3 - 0.
Item 6 - Consultant Agreement with GeoEngineers for Engineering:
Kelly Casteel, Design Engineering Supervisor noted that this project is in the same location as
item S. GeoEngineers will provide materials testing and inspection services related to this project.
Committee member Fincher MOVED to recommend Council authorize the Mayor to sign a
Consultant Services Agreement with GeoEngineers, Inc, in an amount not to exceed
$57,541 to provide engineering services for the Briscoe-Desimone Levee Reach 4
project, subject to final terms and conditions acceptable to the City Attorney and Public
Works Director. The motion was SECONDED by Committee member Ralph and PASSED
3 - 0.
Item 7 - Consultant Agreement with AECOM for Upper Mill Creek Dam Improvements:
Stephen Lincoln, Engineer II, noted that this contract will allow AECOM to continue working on the
project, with focus on obtaining permits from the Department of Ecology and the Army Corps of
Engineers. The permits that are required have a long lead time and are needed in order to
construct the dam improvements.
i
I
Public Works Committee Minutes
August 17, 2015
Committee member Ralph MOVED to recommend Council authorize the Mayor to sign a
Consultant Services Agreement with AECOM in the amount not to exceed $64,127.56 to
provide additional design services related to the Upper Mill Creek Dam Project, subject
to final terms and conditions acceptable to the City Attorney and Public Works Director.
The motion was SECONDED by Committee member Fincher and PASSED 3 - 0.
Item 8 — Railroad Agreement for Milwaukee II Levee:
Mark Madfai, Design Engineering Supervisor noted that this is a long awaited agreement with the
Railroad for the Milwaukee II Levee segment, which lies between 3rd Avenue and the west side of
the Union Pacific Railroad Embankment and connects the Horseshoe Bend Levee with the Foster
Park Levee.
A portion of the proposed levee would consist of a levee wall constructed on the east side of the
Union Pacific railroad track embankment. Within the railroad right of way the levee would then
cross the embankment using concrete jet grouting to connect with the Foster Park Levee on the
west side. In this way the levee would be considered continuous by FEMA, which is necessary for
accreditation of the levee system. This agreement allows for the construction and maintenance of
the levee within the railroad right of way.
Committee member Fincher MOVED to recommend Council authorize the Mayor to sign
the Levee Facility Construction and Maintenance Agreement with the Union Pacific
Railroad for the Milwaukee II Levee, subject to final approval by the City Attorney and
Public Works Director. The motion was SECONDED by Committee member Ralph and
PASSED 3 - 0.
Item 9 - Transportation Improvement Board — Grant Applications:
Chad Bieren, City Engineer noted that it's that time of year again to apply for project funding
through the Transportation Improvement Board (TIB). Bieren noted that grant agencies are
tightening down on funding, therefore we want to make sure that we apply for grants for projects
that we can have shovel' ready.
To that end, Public Works staff members have looked at the current TIB scoring criteria and
determined which projects would most likely score well and have potential funding for the city's
share of the costs.
Staff is proposing street widening/pavement restoration on 80th Avenue South and a non-
motorized project on James Street. The 80th Avenue South Improvements project extends from -
S, 180th Street to S. 196th Street. The project includes street widening and new sidewalks along
with pavement restoration. It is currently on the TIP to include widening from S. 188th Street to
S. 196th Street, we will Include pavement restoration and channelization from S. 188th Street to
S. 180th Street in the TIB application. The James Street non-motorized project would include in-
lane bike lanes and separated path for pedestrians to link Lakeside Boulevard with the Green River
Trail. This is a significant missing link in the non-motorized network. No match has yet been
identified; we are looking at a possible $50,000 match.
Committee member Ralph MOVED to recommend Council authorize the Mayor to direct
staff to complete Transportation Improvement Board grant applications for the 80th
Avenue Improvements, S. 180th Street to S. 196th Street and James Street Non-
Motorized Improvements, Lakeside Boulevard to the Green River Trail. The motion was
SECONDED by Committee member Fincher and PASSED 3 - 0.
2
Public Works Committee Minutes
__--- - -- August 17, 2015
Item 10 — Information Only/Stormwater Utility Analysis Update:
Kristin Lykken, Financial Analyst and Alex Murillo, Environmental Engineering Supervisor provided
an informational PowerPoint following up on questions at the June 15, 2015 Public Works
Committee meeting regarding FEMA flood insurance, businesses with Stormwater facilities, and a
comparison of Kent's stormwater utility rate with other local jurisdictions.
Murillo noted that he spoke to Delores Christianson regarding the questions that she'd asked at
the June 15 meeting. He spoke to her in advance of this meeting.
Information Only/No Motion Required
Item 11 — Information Only/Russell Road Update:
Toby Hallock, Environmental Engineer II gave a brief update on the Upper Russell Road Levee
project. Hallock noted that this project is beginning the final stage of construction necessary to
meet FEMA Accreditation standards. Two phases have been completed, and the third phase
extending north from James Street to the Neely Soames House, is beginning construction the
week of August 24 and will be completed this year.
Property access rights to construct the third phase have been acquired. Hallock stated that there
are still some property negotiations underway. A condemnation ordinance will be presented to the
City Council at the Council Meeting on Tuesday, August 18, to ensure acquisition will be able to be
concluded.
Information Only/No Motion Required
Item 12 — Information Only/Thermoplastic Change Order:
Joe Araucto, Pavement Manager noted that we are 99.9% complete with our construction season
and that we are projecting to be well under the approved budget for the 2015 list of Business &
Occupation projects. Araucto provided area maps of proposed sites for where the remaining
dollars could be spent for the 2015 Plastic Marking contract and the asphalt overlay program. If
council concurs, staff recommends adding additional work to our current contracts thus taking
advantage of favorable weather and contractor availability. Staff will come back to the Committee
with the final amount after the estimate is complete.
Information Only/No Motion Required q
$ K 0 �r ®a oe �. C Jci.v O
y
The meeting was adjourned at 5:25 p.m.
Cheryl Viseth p
Council Committee Recorder
i
3
Gowe St Draiange -Overlay Cost Comparison Oneida,Bsumakc Inlay Pan Contract
Engineer's Estimate
Paul Kuehne Engineer's Estimate R.L.Alia Company
Quantity Increase 102 Williams Ave South '..
Renton,WA 98057
8/13/2015
Ovii TOTAL $295,795.00 Inlay TOTAL $312,030.00
ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT UNIT TOTAL QTY UNIT TOTAL
NO, PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT '..
SCHEDULE I:STREET
IODD Mobilization 1 LS 10,000,00 $10,000.00 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00
1005 Clearing&Grubbing 1 LS 10,000,00 $10,000.00 1 $10,D00.00 $10,000.00
1005 Remove&Dispose of Existing Mailbox&Post 1 LS 100.00 $100.00 1 $100.00 $100 OD
.15 Remove Existling`Ceme?f �n Concrete
Dd<kd�Ffay9.`5D,'trfSY 20.00 $3,,00?0 .00 '$D3D00rXD
1015 Remove Existing Cement Concrete Driveway SSD SY 20.00 $3,000.00 I5o $20.00 $3,000.00
1020 Remove Cement Concrete Sidewalk 450 SY 20.00 $9,000.00 450 $20.00 $9,000OD
1025 Remove Cement Concrete Curb&Gutter 1,200 LF 20.00 $24,000.00 1,200 $20.00 $24,000.00
1040 Removal of Raised Pavement Markers&/or I LS 2,500.00 $2,500.00 1 $2,500.00 $2,500.OD
ThermQolast,(c Trask,Marking
1053 utExistingCe Cement awment=s .c Soo
SIBS . $2,�0:0k .00
1053 Saw Cut Existing Cement Concrete Pavement 500 LF 5.00 $2,500.00 SOD $5.00 $2,500.00
1080 Crushed 5/8"Minus,(Crushed Surfacing) 90 TON 30.00 $2,700.00 90 $30.00 $2,700.00
1100 HMA for Inlay Patch Class 1/2 PG 64 22 425 TON 143.00 $6D JJS 00 40D $143 OD $57 200 00
WIRE „4>an(ititibtt rtau's''PS'w
1125 Cold Plant Mix for Temporary Pavement Patch 5 TON 100.00 $500.00 5 $100.00 $500.00
1135 Cement Concrete Driveway,8"Depth,Reinforced 400 LF 22.00 $10,800.00 400 $27,00 $10,800OD
Gutter Only
1140 Cement Concrete Driveway,8"Depth,Reinforced 10D SY 27.00 $7,700.00 100 $77.00 $7,200.00
1145 Cement Concrete Sidewalk 450 SY 33.00 $14,85D.00 450 $33.00 $14,850.00
1150 Cement Concrete Sidewalk Ramp 1 EA 2,D00.0D $2,000.00 1 $2,ODO.00 $2,000.00
1205 Cement Concrete Curb&Gutter 840 LF 20.00 $16,800.00 SOD $20.00 $16,000,00
1227 Adjust Existing Vault Lid to Finished Grade 1 EA 1,000.00 $1,000.00 1 $I,DD0.00 $1,000.00
1228 Adjust Existing Catch Basin Grate or Curb Inlet Grate ] EA 100.00 $700.00 2 $100.00 $700,00
to Finished Grade
1229 Adjust Existing Manhole Cover to Finished Grade 4 EA 100.00 $400.00 4 $IDO.00 $400,00
1230 Adjust Existing Valve Box Top Section&Lid to ] EA 100.00 $700.00 ] $100.00 $700.00
Finished Grade
1240 Adjust Existing Junction Box t0 Finished Grade 4 EA 100.00 $400.00 4 $100.00 $400.00
1245 Adjusting Existing Monument,Case Is Cover to 1 EA 1,000.00 $1,000.00 1 $1,OD0.00 $1,000.00
Finished Grade
1250 Install New Monument,Case&Cover to Finished 1 EA 1,000.00 $1,000.00 1 $I,O00.00 $1,000.00
Grade
1315 Pothole Utilities 10 EA 30.00 $300.00 10 $30.00 $300.00
1320 Project Sign Installation 2 EA 500.00 $1,000.00 2 $500.00 $1,0DO.00
1355 Minor Changes 1 CALC 13,000.00 $15,000.00 1 $15,00.00 $15,ODO.00
SCHEDULE I TOTAL $224,725.00 $227,350.00
SCHEDULE III:STORM SEWER - p
4£9^I$fg15R` 9$r4®1s41�3i%+PlFi $5( `ot` rc !)"r 1, 4r[Lf i �€ v+;{g�pb wwd� 4 U 1sv rr rti to
t sT�,07iXn-og'd*`'fitltFt`ix,
. a i vR- _ , ,^, ..:<a „' l m'.:,' . , ,�4e.,oa< .# i$ ;$ ----- <�44ADD!
3090 Concrete Inlet 1 EA 1,500.00 $1,300.00 1 $1,500.00 $1,500.00
3125 Crushed 5/8 Minus (Pip a Zone bedding) 60 TON 15.00 $900 OD 60 $15 00 $900 00
",(m recipe sl$y,Fil.. a. ._. r,ur. =i : t $9iAPt „�0 p,=
SCHEDULE III TOTAL $7,450.00 $17,800.00
SCHEDULE IV:TRAFFIC CONTROL
4(0£'f'L f ,z'w t{pSLekA�, �",hi s r.. , �`^.,x'� ?.? 13�i'd :t kip;.<`„' r. .�.-'. 4fY•h ... ,19 'i .{. a4p
?fps x'A" L
4020 Temporary Traffic Cont#roll O.evices 1 L5 500i0y00 $5000TII 1 $5,00000 $500000
k✓(R&$, 9re � { „"$$�I§ ` $'4e .Y1' rS4 �JNa, ssh ''. g4,"e 'v ris ,ir. y �S rxY ssn)`1;w `�L a, .�' �s
50m, s ,>r'," Y,,9
4106 Plastic 4"White Line 360 LF 2.00 $720.00 360 $2.00 $720.00
4105 Plastic Double Yellow Center Line with Raised 670 LF 5.00 $3,350A0 670 $5A0 $3,350.00
Pavement Markers
4115 Plastic Stop Bar Line 20 LF 14.00 $280.00 20 $14.00 $280.00
4120 Plastic Crosswlak Line 144 SF 7.50 $1,080.00 144 $7.50 $1,030.00
SCHEDULE IV TOTAL $34,570.00 $37,830.00
SCHEDULE V:TEMPORARY EROSION&SEDIMENTATION CONTROL
5015 Inlet Protection 9 EA 5D.00 $450.00 9 $50.00 $450.00
5055 Erosion/Water Pollution Control 1 FA 5,000.00 $5,000.00 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00
SCHEDULE V TOTAL $5,450.00 $5,450.00
SCHEDULE VI:ROADSIDE RESTORATION
6000 Street Tree Stump Gdnding/Root Removal Pit SO'L x 20 EA 500.00 $10,000.00 20 $500.00 $10,000.00
5'W x 18"Deoth
6002 Street Tree Planting&Staking 20 EA 400.00 $8,000.00 20 $400.00 $8,000.00
6005 Topsoil Type 10 CY 30.00 $300.00 10 $30.00 $300.00
6015 Beauty Bark 10 CY 30.00 $300.00 10 $30.00 $300.00
SCHEDULE VI TOTAL $18,600.00 $18,600.00
SCHEDULE VII:ELECTRICAL
7002 Induction Loops 2 EA 1,000.00 $2,000.00 2 $1,000.00 $2,000.00
7006 Video Detec0on System,Installation Only 1 LS 3,000.00 $3,000.00 1 $3,000.00 $3,000.00
SCHEDULE VII TOTAL $5,000.00 $5,000.00
SUMMARY:
i
Gooye St Draiange-Overlay Cost Comparison Overlay F Ihnaee Inlay Per Co Oeract
Engineer's Estimate
Paul Kuehne Engineer's Estimate R.L.Alla Company 'I
Quantity increase 107 Williams Ave South
Renton,WA 98057
8/13/2015
Overlay TOTAL $295,795.00 Inlay TOTAL $312,030.00
ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT UNIT TOTAL QTY UNIT TOTAL
NO. PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT
SCHEDULE I TOTAL $224,725.00 $227,350.06
SCHEDULE III TOTAL $7,450.00 $17,800.00
SCHEDULE IV TOTAL $34,570.00 $37,830.00
SCHEDULE V TOTAL $5,450.00 $5,450.00
SCHEDULE VI TOTAL $18,600.00 $18,600.00
SCHEDULE VII TOTAL $5,000.00 $5,000.00
TOTAL $295,795.00 $312,030.00
i
Kuehne Paul
From: Kuehne, Paul
Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2015 4:40 PM
To: Bieren, Chad
Cc: Connor, Eric
Subject: FW: Gowe St Drainage - Cost Reduction Proposal and Quality/Durability Improvement
Attachments: Overlay vs Inlay Cost Comparison - 150811 As
Hello Chad,
Shall the City overlay or inlay Gowe St?
The Contractor will begin demoing curb, gutter, sidewalk and driveway on the north side of
Gowe starting Monday. The extent of curb and gutter replacement varies as well as the
elevations depending upon which option is chosen; (inlay vs. overlay). Forms for new curb and
gutter will be set as early as the end of next week or more likely sometime the following week.
Survey needs time to do their thing. I recommend the City takes advantage of the cost savings,
quality improvements and functionality benefits of overlay, I apologies for the tight time
constraints. But time is running out.
Paul Kuehne, construction Management Supervisor
Construction Management I Public Works Department
220 Fourth Avenue South, Kent, WA 98032
Phone 253-856-5543 1 Cell 253-740-5015
PKuehne@KentWA.gov
CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON
KentWA.gov Facebook YouTube
N L,UF LWg';icLa Tne eiavrc+ mu m��krr i+r FIRM rnvo Hlsr.-MAIL
From: Kuehne, Paul
Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2015 6:20 PM
To: Bieren, Chad
Cc: Connor, Eric
Subject: Gowe St Drainage - Cost Reduction Proposal and Quality/Durability Improvement
Hello Chad,
Shall I adjust new curb and gutter elevations to optimize the drainage benefits of overlay and
accept the Contractor's cost reduction proposal to overlay instead of inlay?
Overlay would reduce overall project cost by $15,000 (see attached analysis) and increase
overall project quality.
Benefits of overlay vs. inlay would include:
1. No-cost opportunity to improve flow-line and thereby improving drainage over the
constraints of the original road design
2. No-cost opportunity to enhance roadway cross slope and thereby improve drainage over
the constraints of the original road profile
3. One to two week reduction of street parking closure
i
i
4. Reduced overall project time (one to two weeks)
5. Smoother roadway surface - smoother ride
6. Structure would be added to the roadway making it stronger more durable with lower
future maintenance costs
7. Greatly reduces seams/cold joints - thereby reducing entry points for moisture leading to
lower maintenance cost and better durability
8. The road is overdue for resurfacing - resurfacing could be accomplished at no extra cost
9. Overlay is estimated to reduce overall project cost by $15,000
I am aware of no detriments to the overlay option vs. inlay. I recommend we accept the
Contractor's proposal to overlay in lieu of inlay.
Paul Kuehne, Construction Management Supervisor I!,
Construction Management I Public Works Department
220 Fourth Avenue South, Kent, WA 98032
Phone 253-856-5543 1 Cell 253-740-5015
PKLiehne@KentWA.aov
CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON
KentWA.gov Facebook YouTube
I,u.1,Econemi r. �iii:errvzwnNnir.nr CtrFORE 111UNIING HISe-MAU
From: David Pankiewicz [mailto:dpank@rlalia.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2015 12:34 PM
To: Kuehne, Paul
Cc: 'Gary Pankiewicz'
Subject: RE: West Gowe Street - Asphalt Paving
Hi Paul,
Rick asked me to send you the following:
Talked to my asphalt sub regarding the original paving scheme vs full on overlay.
He said tonnage is the same and his work time to do either way is the same. He said he will perform either way but does
not have any rebate for either scheme.
This leaves the paving scheme/curb grade up to your choice.
Let me know.
Thanks,
David for Rick
From: David Pankiewicz [mailto:dpank@rlalia.com]
Sent: Monday, August 03, 2015 2:15 PM
To: 'Kuehne, Paul'
Cc: 'Gary Pankiewicz'
Subject: West Gowe Street- Asphalt Paving
Hi Paul,
2
Our asphalt sub is going down to look at the site again to consider the two paving options. He will get back to us by the
end of the week and we'll let you know.
Thanks,
David for Rick
3