Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPW06-147 - Amendment - #2 - R2 Resource Consultants, Inc. - Habitat Conservation Plan - 06/01/2009 Records M =a e.�e m-e�� KEN T �_ ����. Document WASHING TON CONTRACT COVER SHEET This is to be completed by the Contract Manager prior to submission to City Clerks Office. All portions are to be completed. If you have questions, please contact City Clerk's Office. Vendor Name: 112 Resource Consultants, Inc. Vendor Number: JD Edwards Number Contract Number: This is assigned by City Clerk's Office Project Name: Clark Springs Habitat Conservation Plan and EIS Description: ❑ Interlocal Agreement ❑ Change Order ® Amendment ❑ Contract ❑ Other: Contract Effective Date: Date of the Mayor's signature Termination Date: 12/31/10 Contract Renewal Notice (Days): Number of days required notice for termination or renewal or amendment Contract Manager: Kelly Peterson Department: Engineering Detail: (i.e. address, location, parcel number, tax id, etc.): Continue to assist the City in theprel�aration of a Habitat Conservation Plan and Environmental Impact Statement. S Public\RecordsManagement\Forms\ContractCover\adcc7832 1 11/08 KENT W A 5 H I N G T 0 N AMENDMENT NO. 2 NAME OF CONSULTANT OR VENDOR: R2 Resource Consultants, Inc. CONTRACT NAME & PROJECT NUMBER: Clark Springs Habitat Conservation Plan & EIS ORIGINAL AGREEMENT DATE: February 24. 2006 This Amendment is made between the City and the above-referenced Consultant or Vendor and amends the original Agreement and all prior Amendments. All other provisions of the original Agreement or prior Amendments not inconsistent with this Amendment shall remain in full force and effect. For valuable consideration and by mutual consent of the parties, Consultant or Vendor's work is modified as follows: 1. Section I of the Agreement, entitled "Description of Work," is hereby modified to add additional work or revise existing work as follows: In addition to work required under the original Agreement and any prior Amendments, the Consultant or Vendor shall: Continue to assist the City in the preparation of a Habitat Conservation Plan and Environmental Impact Statement. For a description, see the Consultant's April 3, 2009, Scope of Work which is attached as Exhibit A and incorporated by this reference. 2. The contract amount and time for performance provisions of Section II "Time of Completion," and Section III, "Compensation," are modified as follows: Original Contract Sum, $302,324.11 including applicable WSST Net Change by Previous Amendments $0 including applicable WSST Current Contract Amount $302,324.11 including all previous amendments Current Amendment Sum $49,663.80 Applicable WSST Tax on this $0 Amendment //�� ,�R,Revised Contract Sum $351,987.91 (.�&5&110-0r5' SAtaa-rJ (y2&0'?J L1*111ny ra-les are- a;i1cLched as Parf of fh�'s �mey,d��rrf #2� r1 will bee Ile 2009 -tAro!VA �ur,e 30� 20/0, p2 s/z116P AMENDMENT - 1 OF 2 Original Time for Completion June 30,2008 (insert date) Revised Time for Completion under June 30,2009 prior Amendments (insert date) Add'I Days Required (t) for this 549 calendar days Amendment Revised Time for Completion December 31,2010 (insert date) In accordance with Section VII of the Agreement, the Consultant or Vendor accepts all requirements of this Amendment by signing below, by its signature waives any protest or claim it may have regarding this Amendment, and acknowledges and accepts that this Amendment constitutes full payment and final settlement of all claims of any kind or nature arising from or connected with any work either covered or affected by this Amendment, including, without limitation, claims related to contract time, contract acceleration, onsite or home office overhead, or lost profits. This Amendment, unless otherwise provided, does not relieve the Consultant or Vendor from strict compliance with the guarantee and warranty provisions of the original Agreement. All acts consistent with the authority of the Agreement, previous Amendments (if any), and this Amendment, prior to the effective date of this Amendment, are hereby ratified and affirmed, and the terms of the Agreement, previous Amendments (if any), and this Amendment shall be deemed to have applied. The parties whose names appear below swear under penalty of perjury that they are authorized to enter into this Amendment, which is binding on the parties of this contract. IN WITNESS, the parties below have executed this Amendment, which will become effective on the last date written below. CONSULTANT/VENDOR: CITY OF KENT: By: TJG By: (signatu ) /� (signature) Print Na e: iC0Yhe Pr t N uzette Cooke Its rP k idej It Ma or (title) / (t tle) DATE: _om 9 DATE: e APPROVE AS TO FORM: ( plicable If or's signature required) (Klet a D partment R2 Resource-HCP&EIS Amd 2{Petemon AMENDMENT - 2 OF 2 SOW—R2 Resource Consultants April 3, 2009 EXHIBIT A CLARK SPRINGS WATER FACILITIES CITY OF KENT HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN -REQUEST FOR SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET- R2 Resource Consultants R2 Resource Consultants, Inc. (Contractor)has been assisting the City of Kent(City)in the preparation of a Habitat Conservation Plan(HCP) and Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)for their Clark Springs Water Facilities Project The overall objective of this work is to obtain an Incidental Take Permit(ITP) from the Services (NOAA Fisheries, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service) that will afford protection to the City for the continued operations of the Clark Springs Facilities under Section 10 of the federal Endangered Species Act(ESA) This work is being coordinated with the Thompson Smitch Consulting Group (TSCG) who is also under contract to the City. R2's original Statement of Work(SOW)was submitted in November 2003 and identified seven (7) tasks needed to support preparation of the HCP and EIS The TSCG defined three phases involved in securing an ITP via an HCP, including a Negotiation Phase (Phase 1), an EIS Management and Preparation Phase(Phase 2), and a Signing Phase III (Phase 3) The first four tasks of this SOW are considered part of Phase One Activities, and the last three tasks are part of Phase Two R2's original budget focused on activities related to the first two phases The tasks included: • Task I —Existing Information Analysis • Task 2—Agency Meetings/Field Reconnaissance • Task 3—Stakeholder Meetings • Task 4—Preparation of HCP • Task 5—Preparation of EIS • Task 6—Assist with Preparation of Implementing Agreement • Task 7—Ad Hoc Meetings and Respond to Technical Issues As of April 2, 2009, R2 had essentially completed Tasks 1 and major portions of Tasks 2, 3,4, 6, and 7 An Administrative Draft HCP has been completed and an Administrative Draft EIS in near completion. However, a number of tasks have required a greater than anticipated effort to complete resulting in the need to request supplemental funds to support R2's continued assistance to the City of Kent in completing the HCP and EIS A description of and justification for additional funds to support these tasks is presented below. SCOPE OF WORK -SUPPLEMENTAL This Supplemental SOW is to provide funds for R2 to continue to support the City of Kent in the preparation of an HCP and EIS for their Clark Springs Water Facilities Project The original SOW was developed and budgeted around a stringent time schedule City of Kent-Clark Springs HCP I SOW—R2 Resource Consultants April 3, 2009 that targeted the preparation of an HCP and EIS by late 2004-early 2005,with acquisition of an ITP in early to mid-2005. A number of technical issues were identified as part of Task 1 analysis that needed to be addressed prior to proceeding with the initial drafting of the HCP This required substantially more meetings with the City of Kent and other contractors, and increased (because of a prolonged schedule) the number of meetings with the Services In addition,the US Fish and Wildlife Service and National Marine Fisheries Service (collectively the Services) identified the need for a NEPA document coordinator and other specialists for completing the EIS. A supplemental SOW and budget and revised schedule was proposed on January 31, 2006 that anticipated completion of the NEPA process by the end of 2007 The following describes the actual timeline for the development of the HCP and EIS documents under the supplemental 2006 SOW In May of 2006 a Preliminary Draft HCP was released to a number of key stakeholders. A NEPA public scopmg meeting was held at the City of Kent's Council Chambers in June of 2006. Further revisions to the HCP occurred as a result of comments from stakeholders Alternative development occurred in August of 2006. A scopmg report was completed in December 2006. Draft NEPA Chapters 1-3 were developed from September 2006 through March 2007 During May 2007, the Services asked that a memo,which had not been anticipated in our January 2006 SOW,be prepared describing the issues and methods to be used in preparation of Chapter 4, Environmental Consequences. Development of the methods and reviews/revision cycles by the City and the Services led to their eventual approval by the Services in August of 2007. The Chapter 4 analyses began immediately with submission to the Services of a draft Chapter 4 during October 2007 and comments returned by the Services in November 2007 The Services raised a number of concerns to be addressed during revision of Chapter 4,but most importantly issues were raised about the activities to be covered under the ITP and the level of detail describing the activities in the HCP. Further discussions with the Services resulted in revisions (a reduction)to the list of Covered Activities, and unanticipated revisions to Future Operations, and Chapter 6 (impacts assessment) of the HCP. Revisions to Chapter 3 and Chapter 4 of the EIS as a result of the Services comments were eventually submitted to the Services in August 2008 and their 2°a round of comments received January 2009 In summary, additional work effort and revisions have been required to development of the HCP and to Chapters 3 and 4 of the EIS that were not anticipated in the supplemental 2006 SOW and that resulted in substantial delay for completion of the NEPA EIS Because of delay in project completion, increases in staff rates, and the need for unanticipated effort, R2 requests supplemental funding for the following tasks Task 1. Existing Information Analysis This task is complete No additional budget requested. Task 2. Monthly Technical Meetings and Task 3. Stakeholder Meetings Under our original scope of work,we anticipated monthly technical meetings would be required However, at the current point in the process, we expect a lower level of effort City of Kent-Clark Springs HCP 2 SOW—R2 Resource Consultants April 3, 2009 will be needed. We anticipate that some revisions will be required for the HCP following release of the draft to the public and consequently, additional Technical Meetings will be required At this time, we anticipate requiring a minimum of an additional 4 half-day meetings to be attended by the Project Manager(1 meeting) and Deputy Project Manager (4 meetings) to support the HCP. These will include meetings with the City and the Services. We assume there will be no additional Stakeholder meetings other than those required for completion of the NEPA process (Task 5) Costs to complete these tasks are estimated to be $3,105.00 for Task 2 and $0.00 for Task 3 while $1,942.00 remained in the and1 the budget for Task $ >780.00 remained in the budget for Task 3 as of March 23, 2009 Consequently, we anticipate a supplemental budget of$1,523 will be needed for Task 2 and a surplus of$1,789.00 will be available in Task 3. These amounts do not include meetings related to preparation of the EIS, which will be covered under Task 5. Task 4. HCP Preparation As originally scoped, scheduled and budgeted, this task was to provide for the preparation of both a Public Review Draft and the Final HCP for the Clark Springs Water Facilities. However, the unforeseen delays noted above have prolonged the preparation of the Public Review Draft, although it is now complete. Moreover, portions of the budget originally assigned for this task were needed to address unanticipated revisions to the document, as well as to allow preparation and attendance at the greater than anticipated number of technical meetings. As a result, we have expended the budget for tlus task and are currently running a deficit We anticipate a Public Review Draft will be released in mid-summer 2009. A public review and comment period will occur in late-summer and early-fall 2009, and R2 will need to respond to comments and prepare a Final HCP in early-2010 We assume that few revisions (limited to 60 hours of technical staff time)will be necessary to finalize the HCP because a Preliminary Draft HCP was released to selected Stakeholders in May 2006 and their comments were addressed in the current version. The estimated cost to complete the Final HCP is $15,602.00 and the task balance is currently at a deficit of$603.00 as of March 23, 2009 Task 5. Prepare EIS The Administrative Draft EIS is near completion and the Public Review Draft EIS is anticipated to be released in mid-summer 2009. Subcontractors to complete preparation of the EIS include the following consulting firms: • Jones and Stokes—Project management; National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) coordination, soils, and socioeconomics • Biota Pacific—Wildlife, botanical, and wetlands (the latter two resource areas to be subcontracted to Smayda Environmental Associates, Inc.) • Heritage Research Associates (HRA)— Cultural Resources City of Kent-Clark Springs HCP 3 SOW—R2 Resource Consultants April 3, 2009 • Karen Burns, Technical Editor The following outlines the 7 subtasks to be completed by R2 as part of the overall EIS. Subtask 1. Meetings. This subtask assumes 5 meetings with the City of Kent, TSCG, and/or the Services (average of 6 hours per meeting)plus 10 (1-hour) to 20 (half-hour meetings to be conducted by telephone for a total of 10 teleconference hours Subtask 2. Scoping/Alternatives. This task is complete. Subtask 3. Draft EIS Preparation. R2 anticipates that minor revisions to the Administrative Draft EIS will be required following review by the Services. Additional effort will also be required by subcontractors. Subtask 4. Public Comments. This task still remains to be completed and will begin after the comment period following release of the Draft EIS to the public. Jones and Stokes will be taking the lead in supporting the Services in the organization of public comments received following release of the DEIS. We assume approximately 100 comments in 30 to 40 comment letters will need to be addressed. R2 staff will support this effort by addressing comments related to Fish and Aquatic Resources and Hydrology/Water Quality, as well as supporting Jones and Stokes in coordinating comment responses among resource staff and the Services. Depending upon the nature of the comments, some outside technical support (e.g , Michael Kenricks) or support from the City of Kent may be needed to address comments concerning the hydrogeology in the basin, HSPF modeling, or the City's water supply operations. Subtask 5. Final EIS R2 staff will implement revisions to the DEIS for sections they prepared (i e , Fish and Aquatics and Hydrology) as part of the Final EIS R2 will also lead the revisions needed for Chapter 5 (Lists) with some support from technical resource leads, as necessary. Similar to Subtask 3, R2 will participate in strategic decisions and support Jones and Stokes in coordinating revisions to be completed R2 will also have overall responsibility for document production Subtask 6. Record Of Decision (ROD). Jones and Stokes will have primary responsibility for preparation of the ROD. R2 effort is limited to reviewing this document Subtask 7. EIS Project Management. This task includes estimated effort for R2 staff representation during NEPA coordination(4 hours per month). R2 has also included under this subtask effort for project administration and clerical work EIS Schedule and Deliverables Table 1 provides an overall proposed timeline for completing the EIS and ROD The schedule assumes that the Draft EIS will be released to the public during August 2009. Table 2 provides a list of work items, deliverables, and anticipated completion dates A City of Kent-Clark Springs HCP 4 SOW—R2 Resource Consultants April 3, 2009 definitive schedule through public release of the DEIS was developed in collaboration with the Services at a meeting on April 2, 2009. The schedule for addressing public comments on the DEIS and completion of the FEIS is tentative. The overall anticipated completion date for the FEIS and draft ROD is June 2010 The Services may need an additional 45 to 60 days to publish the ROD The project schedule assumes • The Services will need 6 weeks to revise and publish the Notice of Availability (NOA) • 3-week review periods by Kent and the Services for each draft section • 4-week revision periods by the consultant team • A 60-day public continent period for the draft EIS EIS Costs to Complete Table 2a provide an effort and cost breakdown for each of the Subtasks outlined above. R2's portion of the estimated cost to complete the Clark Springs Water Supply HCP EIS is $59,702.00 The total estimated cost to complete the EIS is $122,933 30 The task balance as of March 23, 2009 was $88,032 00 Assumptions concerning the supplemental budget request are the same as in the January 31, 2006 SOW. Subcontractor costs and markup on subcontractor costs total $63,231 00 and are a significant portion of the estimated costs to complete the EIS. Subcontractor costs for Jones and Stokes are anticipated to exceed their January 2006 estimate by$32,805.00 because of unanticipated effort needed for the DEIS development, project delays, and increases in staff rates (Attachment A) Subcontractor cost for Karen Burns is also anticipated to exceed her January 2006 estimate because of an increase in her hourly rate; however, her estimated level of effort has not changed Subcontractor rates for HRA have increased,but they believe their January 2006 budget estimate is adequate for completing the FEIS (i.e , higher rates will be compensated by a lower than expected level of effort). Subcontractor rates for Biota Pacific and their subcontractor, Kathy m h h he level of effort required to Smayda,Have creased, but rough Marc 2 3, 20 09, t complete the DEIS was less than their January 2006 estimate R2's estimated costs to complete the EIS anticipates these savings will be realized and reduces our overall supplemental budget request Table 2b includes line items for the estimated cost to complete for each subcontractor working on the HCP EIS. Task 6—Assist With Implementing Agreement R2 shall work closely with the TSCG in preparing an Implementing Agreement(IA) for the HCP One meeting has occurred to develop the IA. We anticipate that less effort will be required for this task than originally anticipated. Consequently we anticipate a task surplus of$825.50. Task 7—Ad Hoc Meetings and Respond to Technical Questions City of Kent-Clark Springs HCP 5 SOW—R2 Resource Consultants April 3, 2009 This task has been expended No supplemental budget requested at this time. Total Costs to Complete the Project The total cost to complete each task of the project estimated as of March 23, 2009 are: COSTS -Total Cost to Complete Costs by Task are: • Task 2 —Monthly Agency Meetings $3,105.50 • Task 3—Stakeholder Meetings: $0.00 • Task 4— HCP Preparation- $15,602.00 • Task 5— EIS Preparation: $122,933.30 • Task 6—Implementation Agreement 2,036 50 Project Cost To Complete Total: $143,676 80 Project Balance as of March 30, 2009. $94,013.00 Supplemental Budget Request $49,663 80 See attached Tables 1 and 2 for a detailed cost breakdown. Table 1. Proposed EIS Schedule. Date of Work Item Deliverable Completion Subtask 3 Administrative DEIS ADEIS to Services 5 wk review) April 17,2009 Camera-ready DEIS and draft Notice Camera-ready and draft NOA to Services July 16,2009 of Availability Public Release Draft EIS August 28,2009 Public Comment Ends(60 days) October 2009 Subtask 4 Draft Comment Summary Draft Comment Summary to Kent and November 2009 Services(3 wk review) Final Comment Summary Final Comment Summary to Kent and December 2009 Services Subtask 5 Preliminary Administrative FEIS Preliminary AFEIS to Kent(3 wk review) January2O10 AFEIS AFEIS to Services(5 wk review) March 2010 Camera-ready FEIS and NOA Camera-ready FEIS and draft NOA to April 2010 Services Final EIS Production and Public Release Ma 2010 Subtask 6 Draft ROD Draft ROD to Services June 2010 City of Kent-Clark Springs HCP 6 0 0 N (7 R N N 0 p. x _ F x a V M P VJ E 'j f r N 3 p 6 * o 0 0 M O O O S O S O S O S O S O O S O S O O O N ♦ O a S 46 d r a ti _) N � I cay W w C L 0 m E U + 1 A '� V 3 60 V 6yy U yTy 'COC p II y I O 9 z ° 0 0 a v 0 N S S I e S eW S O S O I O Oe0 S I O W O � W F £ P N I I NH 8 8 s 8 8 8 8 8 s I s s s s s 8 8 S S S v Fa m _e O O Qj O O O S w i O O O O C O I N O O YI O w N y N N n F d¢r'li�i I I i H I e o g l 8 g g 8 g g m ! o o g g o I o o e e e e X Vi y r - o O o o O H b H Om V ,O t� a en t7 O a` r d '•l'-3x , N H d : _ a 43 C C « p H=�z O O 111111 O O O O O O N O O O O O N O v N N AI U.S yx m °o a�-V I Soo N SS S 8 S I S S O O C O X C b H w � N H w w w H N w w w w H N H II H H N H y V ,00 e h Z •� � m F4 � i a b W H � r � c e ,`o - C +rcwl _ CA ° c ,a ° a a', 9 o u E a O ) o e F y V w e 4 5 ti -O � 01 a� W O cG 0o N oC o0 7 O a0 � d' N N p F x N c6 Z' EA 69 69 69 i o O O O O O O 7 O N O O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ^ O b O O O m I O O O O V O O O �y, 69 69 fA a ILILI) 69 fA 64 m Ff3 m x °oZIII I y bq Y�1 y �] oo d oD o0 00 0 7 0 0 0 0 Uj yq O O O O O O C O O C N O N b d I F x a O O O' ^ O O x B o y d ay-� o O N O O oo C O O O O F1�1 v3 69 01 N 69 N 69 69 N 64 �O N j U rA N qp o 0 0 0 0 m o 0 0 o m 0 0 0 � 0 �- ❑ In VSv- �+ y b9 69 69 69 M 69 69 xcn w U A 4 IT zs » d 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 o c'i o 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G a+ y fA 69 69 b9 b9 fR 69 69 64 b9 Vf m O O O O O O O O O m O O O lz{ O O O O O O O O O O O 65 d i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 o N H Vi 69 � 69 69 69 69 � fA 69 U O � a x U) a w � of `e U_ h o C J 57 M y N uJ H LL Z O U w N p U LL v � z U Ii m CG. G" v .� .`.� Nr0 NN W 7 y .U. O Cu G N y U LL U m '•, a Icaa � w F ¢ ¢ �, 0 0 c 0 0 0 1 0 O O O O O O i 0 I O O O O O I M I o 0 0 0 0 0 O t+) O M1 00 C) O O 69 O O O �D e-1 �A �D Y3 69 69 O b b l� M V' 00 ! M 00 ! .+ .� t� Q� O 69 di Vi N ao ti Cl) Vi d O Eo I o o f o00000 ! o ioo 0 �0 0 0 � u E o0 00 0� o i o i o I ooc000 t o 000 00 � I 1 [� o 0 0 � o I o 0 00000o j o 00 0 O O O O O Ci 0 0 O O o A vs vj v> I � ds vi I v3 Fn vj c9 v3 'n I 'n 69 69 Vi � N O a. o o e , e o00000 a ee e [� o 0 0 o r� m H O A O A o06 ce N wU 49 i N vt l� T %n C Ixcn w us I es i i vi sv i �n sz UiC p i000 Io o , o i o0000o Io 00 0 O ►�4 p ,u� a o 0 0 0 0 0 000000 0 00 0 cn of sv I ds I va � as i �s sv of sv sv vi I 'n � b .. U I ! i U y +' j o j o I o00000 ! o' o0 o N U A M o 0 0 l o 0 o f o 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 iti I L N A n W @ C A i i I bs v, o c ao� o 0 o i o o , o l o0000o I o 00 0 � vi va va I Vi � Yf vi ! sv sr� v3 F» s5 F» ! uz vi of 6ff o � r: Fri f I j i o 0 0 ! o ! o I o o 0 0 0 0 0 ! o 0 0 0 ^I y o 0 o I o o n o 00000o I o oa c O C 49 Vi 69 Hi 4f 69 � 69 fA 64 6R 69 Vl V. N 00 M U1 •� i i � i i Vl Vl 1{ Ij vi Yi I I rn i i I o i N CL i ui I C t y CL i W N F � I I 5 UU I � vo vabs � I p d .r W alW Q > c a W t o U E m ! Z LL F cmi .a iu W �I� a c Y I E uII m o FIU c O w_ S D ay, c y c Fc1 a n F" u ,x q O y U A R U " Z 45 y a ;. I j c m u W o � ❑ o �I �I a U .d i O .7 a� W c y a a� o� y ° n W al 8 ' U O a F lL Cl) U F., K o o oIo m m o 0 y ry 0 u o Cq u f o CG o o O .. W U U ! u, cY. NUZUU g' I v: ow EF F' 8 M a` o `o H N d m O N VOV � m E � o m n a0 m 7 N P NN � C1 w N N E m W w w w O O O N N O a W p y Y w w m w m N N a0 m S (9 w w a Ow O r m tp N N (7 M 17 m W a w w mw mw w w � w w m J Y N m O N j P O W O w f` C = N Ol 10 OLL p C w Q ar c •+ 3 m U c (Q N 2)� E u 3 O V P' �' m` N N O E N j N o m W o o t° c I t • -� o e O` fpt O` n In N E v P m n M m v O U t C m n n N m m E O i E U o2 - Q e ye � O C t d E r u - Q d '• C O � m U � ' r N O W Y Eo N ~ E C U Y t] N N C D P e L A C N o m In o E m m s o Y �Q[ Y LL N x2 U 2 - f R2 Resource Consultants,Inc. Standard Rate Schedule--Y2009 LABOR 2009 CATEGORY LABOR LABOR RATE (Classification) (Employee) (Rate/Hr)* 31 $222.00 30 Dudley Reiser,Ph.D. $184.00 29 Michael Ramey,P E $158.00 29 Peter Christensen, P E $158 00 29 Michael Loftus,Ph D $158.00 29 Dana Postlewait,P.E $158.00 28 Ronald Campbell $149.00 28 Paul DeVrtes,Ph.D,P E $149 00 28 Phil Hilgert $149.00 28 MaryLouise Keefe,Ph.D $149 00 28 Frank Postlewarte,P.E. $149 00 27 Stuart Beck, Ph D,P E $140 00 27 Allen Danskine,P E $140 00 27 Dan Turner,P E $140 00 26 James Schulz $128 00 26 Joetta Lablotney $128 00 25 Noble Hendrix,Ph D $112 00 25 Chi-Ming Huang, Ph D.,P.E. $112 00 25 Enc Jeanes $112 00 25 Alan Olson $112 00 24 Jody Breckenridge $102 00 24 Michael Gagner $102 00 24 Susan Madsen $102 00 23 Glen Anderson P E. $97 00 23 Carolyn Butchart,P E. $97 00 23 Suzanne Picard,P E $97 00 23 Claw Yoder,P E. $97 00 22 Mike Cooksey $82 00 22 Bradley Gochenour S82 00 22 Kenneth McBride $82 00 22 Catherine Morello $82 00 22 Timothy Nightengale $82 00 22 Karee Oliver $82 00 22 Sabrina Panos $82 00 22 Timothy Sullivan $82 00 21 Cathy Bonitz-Eakin $73 00 21 Nicolas Romero $73.00 20 $66.00 9 $76.00 8 Loyce Patios $66.00 7 Michelle McLaughlin $56 00 6 Field Technician 11 $56 00 5 Field Technician 1 $47 00 *Labor rates are effective through December 31,2009 R2 Resource Consultants, Inc. Standard Equipment Rate Schedule, Year 2009 Equipment" Equipment Rate Office GIS/CAD $10 perhour Equipment Copying/reproduction(8 1/2x11 b&w) $.10 per page Usage Copying/reproduction 1Ix17 b&w) $.20 per page Color Copies(8 1/2x11, 1lxl7) $1 per page,$1.50 per page Plotter color $5 per sq ft. Facsimile $1 per page GBC(Collator indin ,Su lies) $1 50 per set Transportation(R2 Company Vehicle): Vehicle(4WD)Mileage $.75 per mile Field 35-mm camera $5 per day Equipment Video camera $50 per day;$150 per week Usage Dell Computer Projector $100 per day DissolvedOxygen/Temp Meter $25 per day Current Meter $50 per day Conductivity/pH/Temp Meter $20 per day Turbidity Meter $30 per day Fish Processor Pk $5 per day Surveying Equipment $25 per day Snorkel m Sam lin D suit Equipment $35 per day Laptop Computer $100 per week Depth Finder $100 per week Large Raft, Small Raft $100 per day, $50 per day Large Electrofishor Raft $250 per day Backpack Electroshocker $75 per day Shoreline Electroshockor Package $100 per day Small Raft wNVP Electroshocker $125 per day 19'Boston Whaler $350 per day Hydrolab-Quanta 4 $100 per day Substrate Sam lor Pk $25 per day Stream Temp Recorder $25 per month GPS Unit $10 per day Invertebrate Sampling Pkg $10 per day Habitat Mapping Equipment $5 per day Field Data Recorders $25 per day PHABSIM (Habitat Survey)Pk $75 per day Dissecting Microscope $5 per day Photo Stereoscope $15 per day "Subsistence,transportation and travel costs and misc expenses shall be billed at a 10%markup Client#: 334174 R21RESCON DATE ACORD, CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE 05/1312009(MMIDDNYYY) PRODUCER THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION Kibble&Prentice,a USI Co. ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE O Box 370 HOLDER THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND,EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW Battle,WA 98111 206 441-6300 INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC# INSURED INSURER& National Fire Insurance Co.of Hartf 20478 R2 Resource Consultants, Inc. INSURER B U. S.Specialty Insurance Company 29599 15250 NE 95TH Street INSURER Redmond,WA 98052 INSURER D INSURER E COVERAGES THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT,TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN,THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS,EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS INSR ADD' LTR NSR E TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER DA YMMIDDIYYEOLICYI PDATE(MMI EXPIRATION LIMITS A GENERAL LIABILITY 3011007524 02/01/09 02/01/10 EACH OCCURRENCE $1 000 000 X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY DAMAGE TO RENTPREMISES �CcEDance, $1,000,000 CLAIMS MADE F-X-1 OCCUR MED EXP(Any one person) $1 O 000 PERSONAL&ADV INJURY $1,000,000 GENERAL AGGREGATE s2,000,000 GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER PRODUCTS-COMPIOP AGG $2000000 POLICY X PROJECT LOC A AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY 3011007538 02/01/09 02/01/1 O COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT $1 000,000 X ANY AUTO (Ea accident) , ALL OWNED AUTOS BODILY INJURY $ SCHEDULED AUTOS (Per person) X HIRED AUTOS BODILY INJURY X NON-OWNED AUTOS (Per accident) $ PROPERTY DAMAGE $ (Per accident) GARAGE LIABILITY AUTO ONLY-EA ACCIDENT $ ANY AUTO OTHERTHAN EAACC $ AUTO ONLY AGG $ EXCESSIUMBRELLA LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE $ OCCUR CLAIMS MADE AGGREGATE $ S DEDUCTIBLE S RETENTION $ $ A WORKERS COMPENSATION AND 3011007524 02/01/09 02/01/10 WR 5 iaMITTUj I X OTH- FR EMPLOANY PR ERIETOPJ LITY (WA Stop Gap) EL EACH ACCIDENT $1,000,000 ANY PROPRIETORIPARTNER/EXECIJTNE OFFICERIMEMBER EXCLUDED? EL DISEASE-EA EMPLOYEE $1,000,000 If yes,describe under SPECIAL PROVISIONS below E L DISEASE-POLICY LIMIT $2,000,000 B OTHER Professional US081119004 07/01/08 07/01/09 $1,000,000 per claim Liability $1,000,000 annl aggr DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS I LOCATIONS I VEHICLES/EXCLUSIONS ADDED BY ENDORSEMENT/SPECIAL PROVISIONS Re Habitat Conservation Plan for the Clark Springs Water Facilities. The City of Kent is named as additional insured on the General Liability Policy,with respects to operations of the named insured Coverage is primary.Other insurance maintained by the certificate holder will not be called upon to contribute CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION City of Kent DATE THEREOF,THE ISSUING INSURER WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL dr,_ DAYS WRITTEN Don Wickstrom,P.E. NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT,BUT FAILURE TO DO SO SHALL 220 Fourth Ave s IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY OF ANY KIND UPON THE INSURER,ITS AGENTS OR Kent,WA 98032 REPRESENTATIVES AUTHORIZEDJ2EPRESENTATIVE ACORD 25(2001108)1 of 2 #M3838991 PC5JA © ACORD CORPORATION 1988 r IMPORTANT If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED,the policy(ies)must be endorsed A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s) If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy,certain policies may require an endorsement A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s) DISCLAIMER The Certificate of Insurance on the reverse side of this form does not constitute a contract between the issuing insurer(s), authorized representative or producer,and the certificate holder, nor does it affirmative) or negatively amend, extend or alter the coverage afforded b the policies listed thereon Y 9 YY ACORD 25-S(2001108) 2 of 2 #M3838991 Policy Number: BKO1415360 Liability Coverage Enhancement - Architects and Engineers ENOOHSEMEPVT THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the fcllowing LIABILITY COVERAGE PART 1 The following replaces the final paragraph of (a) Your negligence;or SECTION II.WHO IS AN INSURED,1.. (b) The negligence of another person or However, no person or organization is an insured organization for whom you are with respect to the conduct of any current or past liable, partnership, joint venture, limited liability company or trust that is not shown as a Named (2) "Bodily injury", "property damage", Insured in the Liability Coverage Part personal injury" or "advertising injury" Declarations This provision does not apply to you, for which such person or organization for your participation in any past or present has assumed liability in a contract or "unnamed joint venture", or if that person or agreement, except for liability for organization is otherwise an insured under damages that such person or Paragraph 2.below, organization would have in the absence of the contract or agreement; 2 The following is added to SECTION II. WHO IS AN (3) "Property damage'to: INSURED,2. Person Or Organization Required By (a) Property owned, used or occupied Written Contract by, or loaned or rented to, such person or organization, Any person or organization that you agree to add as an insured under this Liability (b) Property over which such person or Coverage Part in a written contract or organization far any purpose agreement that is made before, and in effect exercising physical control,or when, the "bodily injury" or "property damage" occurs or the offense that causes (c) "Your work" performed for the insured,or the "personal injury" or"advertising injury" is first committed, but only with respect to that (4) "Bodily injury", "property damage", person's or organization's liability arising out "personal injury" or "advertising injury" of "your work" for that person or arising out of any architect's, engineer's organization or surveyor's rendering of, or failure to However, such person or organization is not render, any "professional service", when an insured with respect to any such person or organization is an architect, engineer or surveyor (1) "Bodily injury', "property damage 3 The following is added to SECTION II. WHO IS AN "personal injury" or "advertising injury"that does not arise out of INSURED CUSF 26 09 09 03 Includes copyrighted material of Insurance services Office with its permission Page 1 of 3 Copyright,Insurance Services Office,Inc 2001 "Unnamed joint venture" means any joint venture ` in which you are a member or partner where a. Each and every one of your cc-ventures in that joint venture is an architectural, engineering or surveying firm,and b. That joint venture is not named in the Liability Coverage Part Declarations "Your premises" means any premises, site, or location owned or occupied by,or rented to,you. "Your project" a. Means any premises, site or location at, on, or in which "your work" is not yet completed, and h. Does not include "your premises" or any location listed in the Schedule of Premises All other terms of your policy remain the same CUBF 26 09 09 03 Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services office with its permission Page 3 of 3 Copyright,Insurance Services office,Inc 21001 REQUEST FOR MAYOR'S SIGNATURE 7�• Please Fill in All Applicable Boxes / ,KcNO WASHINGTON This form must be printed on cherry paper Routing Information (ALL REQUESTS MUST FIRST BE ROUTED THROUGH THE LAW DEPARTMENT) Originator: Kelly Peterson Phone (Originator) 5547 Date Sent- 5/26/09 Date Required: 6/2/09 Return Signed Document to: Nancy Yoshitake CONTRACT TERMIWJON DATE: 12/31/10 VENDOR NAME: R2 Resource Consultants, Inc DATE OF COUNCIL APPROVAL: 5/5/09 Brief Explanation of Document. The attached amendment 2 is for the consultant to provide technical assistance to complete the Final Habitat Conservation Plan and the associated Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Clark Springs Water Source. All Contracts Must Be Routed Through the Law Department (This Area to be Completed By the Law Department) Received: Approval of Law Dept.: Law Dept. Comments: ad Date Forwarded t Mayor- Shaded reas to Be Co J pleted by Administration Staff 15 Received: Recommendations & Comments: CtN pF KENO Gn CLERK � Disposition. Date Returned: Iage5870_templatebase • 2/07