Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout4289 ORDINANCE NO. 4289 AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, amending the Kent Comprehensive Plan and its Capital Facilities Element to include the Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent, Federal Way, Auburn and Highline School Districts (CPA-2018-5). RECITALS A. The State of Washington Growth Management Act (GMA) requires internal consistency among comprehensive plan elements and the plans from other jurisdictions. B. To assure that comprehensive plans remain relevant and up to date, the GMA allows amendments to the capital facilities element of comprehensive plans concurrently with the adoption or amendment of a city budget. RCW 36.70A.130(2)(a)(iv). C. The City of Kent has established procedures for amending the Comprehensive Plan in Chapter 12.02 of the Kent City Code (KCC), allowing amendment of the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan concurrently with the adoption or amendment of the City budget and allowing the City Council to hold the public hearing instead of the Land Use and Planning Board. KCC 12.02.010. 1 Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2018119 — 2023124 School Dist. Capital Facilities Plans D. The Kent, Federal Way, Auburn and Highline School Districts have submitted proposed amendments to their Capital Facilities Plans to be included in an amendment of the City's Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan. E. After providing appropriate public notice, the City Council of the City of Kent considered the requested Comprehensive Plan amendment and held a public hearing on the same on October 16, 2018. F. On September 18, 2018, the City provided the required 60 day notification under RCW 36.70A.106 to the State of Washington of the City's proposed amendment to the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan. The 60-day notice period has passed, and by operation of law, it is deemed approved. G. On November 20, 2018, the City Council of the City of Kent approved the Capital Facilities Element amendment CPA-2018-5 to include the Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent, Federal Way, Auburn and Highline School Districts, as set forth in Exhibit "A" attached and incorporated by this reference. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: ORDINANCE SECTION 1. - Amendment. The Kent Comprehensive Plan, and its Capital Facilities Element, are amended to include the Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent, Federal Way, Auburn and Highline School Districts, as set forth in Exhibit "A" attached and incorporated by this reference (CPA- 2018-5). 2 Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2018119 - 2023124 School Dist. Capital Facilities Plans i SECTION 2. - Corrections by City Clerk or Cade Reviser. Upon approval of the city attorney, the city clerk and the code reviser are authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance, including the correction of clerical errors; ordinance, section, or subsection numbering; or references to other local, state, or federal laws, codes, rules, or regulations. SECTION 3. - Severabilitv. If any one or more section, subsection, or sentence of this ordinance is held to be unconstitutional or invalid, that decision will not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 4. - Effective Date. This ordinance will take effect and be in force 30 days from and after its passage, as provided by law. November 20 2018 DANA RALPH, MA 'OR Date Approved ATTEST: . November 20, 2018 KIMBERLEY A, OMOTO, CITY ttERK Date Adopted November 23, 2018 Date Published APPR D AS T ORM c!! FT' PAT CITY A?TC7 NEY 3 Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2018119 - 2023124 School Dist. Capital Facilities Plans i Bligr[Cl rwi �00 Kent Sufth, I ca a Facie Riesp Phan 2016-2019 - 2023 2024 r %! r KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Apii[2018 0 "Islrl'" cl Kent Sicho,o�l SIX - YEAR CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2018-2019 - 2023-2024 May 2018 Kent School District No. 415 12033 SE 256th Street Kent, Washington 98030-6643 (253) 373-7295 i I KENT Sct•1001 BOARD of DIRECTORS Ms. Maya Vengadasalam, President Ms. Deborah Straus, Vice President Mr. Ross Hardy, Legislative Representative Ms. Karen DeBruler, Director Ms. Denise Daniels, Director ADMINISTRATION Dr. Calvin J. Watts Superintendent of Schools Mr. Benjamin Rarick, Executive Director of Fiscal Services Mr. Fred Long, Executive Director of Facilities Services Kent School District Slx-Yaar Capital Facilities Plan April 2018 Kent SChOO1 DIOStrict Six Tear Capital(Facilities Ttan Table of Contents Section Page Number I Executive Summary 2 11 Six-Year Enrollment Projection & History 4 III District Standard of Service 9 1 V Inventory, Capacity & Maps of Existing Schools 12 V Six-Year Planning & Construction Plan —Site Map 17 V I Portable Classrooms 20 V I I Projected Classroom Capacity 21 VIII Finance Plan, Cost Basis and Impact Fee Schedules 26 I X Summary of Changes to Previous Plan 33 X Appendixes 35 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2018 a i I Executive Summary This Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") has been prepared by the Kent School District (the "District") as the organization's capital facilities planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act, King County Code K.C.C. 21A.43 and Cities of Kent, Covington, Renton, Auburn, Black Diamond, Maple Valley, and SeaTac. This annual Plan update was prepared using data available in the spring of 2018 for the 2018-2019 school year. This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the Kent School District. This Plan is not intended to be the sole planning document for all of the District's needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic Long Range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board Policies, taking into account a longer or shorter time period, other factors and trends in the use of facilities, and other needs of the District as may be required. Prior Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent School District have been adopted by Metropolitan King County Council and Cities of Kent, Covington, Auburn and Renton and included in the Capital Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. This Plan has also been submitted to cities of Black Diamond, Maple Valley, and SeaTac for their information and inclusion in their Comprehensive Plans. In order for impact fees to be collected in the unincorporated areas of Kent School District, the Metropolitan King County Council must adopt this Plan and a fee- implementing ordinance for the District. For impact fees to be collected in the incorporated portions of the District, the cities of Kent, Covington, Renton and Auburn must also adopt this Plan and their own school impact fee ordinances. This Capital Facilities Plan establishes a standard of service in order to ascertain current and future capacity. While the State Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines do not account for local program needs in the District. The Growth Management Act, King County and City codes and ordinances authorize the District to make adjustments to the standard of service based on specific needs for students of the District. This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. Program capacity is based on an average capacity and updated to reflect changes to special programs served in each building. Portables in the capacity calculation use the same standard of service as the permanent facilities. Kent School District SIN-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2010 2 I The capacity of each school in the District is calculated based on the District's standard of service and the existing inventory of permanent facilities. The District's program capacity of permanent facilities reflects program changes and the state's mandated reduction of class size to meet the standard of service for Kent School District. Portables provide additional transitional capacity. Kent School District is the fifth largest (fte basis) district in the state. Enrollment is electronically reported monthly to the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction ("OSPI") on Form P-223. Although funding apportionment is based on Annual Average Full Time Equivalent(AAFTE), enrollment on October 1 is a widely recognized "snapshot in time"that is used to report the District's enrollment for the year as reported to OSPI. The District received authorization from the Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction to temporarily re-open the former Kent Elementary School at 317 Fourth Ave South in Kent. This facility will be used to house the kindergarten and early child education classes for both Kent and Neely-O'Brien Elementary Schools to alleviate overcrowding at those schools. This building re-opened in fall 2014 as the Kent Valley Early Learning Center, The District's standard of service, enrollment history and projections, and use of transitional facilities are reviewed in detail in various sections of this Plan. The District plans to continue to satisfy concurrency requirements through the transitional use of portables. A financing plan is included in Section VIII which demonstrates the District's ability to implement this Plan. Pursuant to the requirements of the Growth Management Act, this Plan will be updated annually with changes in the impact fee schedules adjusted accordingly. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2018 3 I I Six - Year Enrollment Projection I i For capital facilities planning, enrollment growth projections are based on cohort survival and student yield from documented residential construction projected over the next six years. (See Table Z page 8 andmep Page 37). The student generation factor is the basis for the growth projections from new developments. (seepages) I King County live births and the District's relational percentage average were used to determine the number of kindergartners entering the system. (see Table o, page 7) 8.19% of 25,032 King County live births in 2012 is projected for 2,050 students expected in Kindergarten for October 1, 2017. This is an increase of 402 live births in King County over the previous year. (See Tabra Y.pages) Early Childhood Education students (also identified as "ECE"), "Early Childhood Special Education ("ECSE") students are forecast and reported to OSPI separately on Form P-223H for Special Education Enrollment. Capacity is reserved to serve students in the ECE programs at elementary schools. The first grade population of Kent School District is traditionally 1-3% larger than the kindergarten population due to growth and transfers to the District. Cohort survival method uses historical enrollment data to forecast the number of students projected for the following year. Projections for October 1, 2017-2022 are from OSPI Report 1049— Determination of Projected Enrollments. Within practical limits, the District has kept abreast of proposed developments. The District will continue to track new development activity to determine impact to schools. Information on new residential developments and the completion of these proposed developments in all jurisdictions will be considered in the District's future analysis of growth projections. (see mappage 37) The Kent School District serves eight permitting jurisdictions: unincorporated King County, the cities of Kent, Covington, Renton, and Auburn and smaller portions of the cities of SeaTac, Black Diamond, and Maple Valley Kent School District$ix•Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2018 4 i i STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR "Student Factor" is defined by King County code as "the number derived by a school district to describe how many students of each grade span are expected to be generated by a dwelling unit" based on district records of average actual student generated rates for developments completed within the last ten years. Following these guidelines, the student generation rate for Kent School District is as follows: Single Family Elementary .398 Middle School .096 Senior High .185 Total 679 Multi-Family Elementary .117 Middle School .028 Senior High .029 Total .174 The student generation factor is based on a survey of 2,757 single-family dwelling units and 1,831 multi-family dwelling units with no adjustment for occupancy rates. Please refer to Appendix D on Page 37 of the Capital Facilities Plan for details of the Student Generation Factor survey. In preparing the 2017-2018 to 2022-2023 Capital Facilities Plan the District contracted with Davis Demographics and Planning (DDP) of Riverside California, a noted expert in demographic studies for school districts, to analyze and prepare the student generation factor. DDP used a larger sample of single family residences than the district did in previous plans and included both "garden" and '.urban style" apartments in the calculation for multi-family residences. Urban style apartments typically have four stories, a central lobby and entrance, elevator access to all floors and have a central corridor with apartments on each side. These apartments have little or no surface street parking, with parking located beneath the building; retail may or may not be included with the building. If there is retail it will generally be located on the first floor. These apartments seldom have swimming pools and do not have playgrounds for children. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Faciltties Plan April 2018 5 I Garden style apartments will have very little studio apartments and will have more three bedroom apartments then the urban style and in theory generate more students enrolled in school. These apartments will also have lawns, club houses, swimming pools and places for children to play. The District felt that it is important to include both styles of apartments for the student generation factor. Though it is anticipated that few students will come from the urban style, they are now part of the mix in Kent and thus should be included in mix of multi-family housing units. Within the district's boarders there are several low-income and multi-family housing projects coming on-line during 2017-2018. Once developed and occupancy occurring the District does recognize that the student generation for multi-family housing will likely increase for future Capital Facilities Plan updates. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2018 6 W N I N 4 O O p e O 0 0 N 0? O O m a0 iO�pp 19 M y C N N N N N N M N N N N NI (O M a^ M r M tCl IO M N IA OI N O N N 9 F., cc m .r- r (O (O 00 O 0 N N O 6) (O M G a o o rn o o O m n `q M R (V N N N N N IV N N N h o Ncc Ln M ICI m N N N O+ ro O C N N N N N �... a Ot e r O O m M pp m N m ry y 2U t�/1 Z 5 O O CVI O N m C O O O OOD j 0 0 na. W a W 9j$p N ry ryN O N N (Np N N N N LLy a$ LSD N O O3 N N m m V N m ypO r M °� b a = r O p N n M 0 N N N m N N N N N N N N v 3 Z Z g N rn h e r �poO N pO m W O� pNp�� IrMj O N 10 M O F N N O GC N W S N N N N O 61 N N C d Z FO �p ly N eN N m r T I(1 (p h g DU N N N N N N N N Ot W� N ry o c ro G� 0 N r'96 N — N N N N N N N i v m N N a0 N O W N N V) Lo FCqcl N N a Z Q�W Y M m r m O N N m QI m m E j p pp (p tmY 5p h Y N N N N V OI m m O O N N N N N N� O tD O o C 0 0.W N N aO a W m m 0 U x =m E m ro N m y In m r m r � O g+ w p � II k m 5 c Y Y C9 C9 C9 U C9 0 0 U U' C9 U 0 II ro LL R U } y S O Y 7 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.415 SIX-YEAR ENROLLMENT PROJECTION Full Day Kinder g amen at all Elam LB in 2012 LB In 2013 LB In 2014 LB In 2015 La Est.2016 LB Est.2017 La Est.2018 ACTugL P R 0 J E c T 1 O N October 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 King County Live Births ' 25,032 24,910 25,348 25,487 26,011 26,011 26,011 ' Increase/Decrease 402 -122 438 139 524 0 0 Kindergarten/ Birth % 2 8.14% 8,17% 8.07% 8.01% 7.84% 7,82% 7.80% FD Kindergarten @ 1.0 2037 2,036 2,046 2,042 2,038 2,034 2,030 Grade 1 2056 2,065 2,081 2,077 2.073 2,069 2,065 Grade 2 2077 2.084 2,068 2,107 2,103 2,098 2,094 Grade 3 2143 2.093 2,116 2,092 2,131 2,127 2,122 Grade 4 2218 2,173 2,208 2,135 2,111 2,150 2,146 Grade 5 2189 2,228 2,230 2,223 2,150 2,126 2,165 Grade 6 2119 2,191 2,219 2,239 2,232 2,159 2,135 Grade 7 1922 2,120 2,104 2,210 2,230 2,223 2,151 Grade 8 2043 1,945 1,964 2,125 2,233 2,253 2,246 Grade 9 2006 2,134 2,236 2,150 2,326 2,445 2,467 Grade 10 2080 2,097 1.966 1,985 1,909 2.065 2,171 Grade 11 1823 1,929 1.620 1.704 1,720 1,655 1,790 Grade 12 1810 1,870 1,594 1,420 1,493 1,507 1,450 Total Enrollment Projections 26,523 26,965 26,452 26,509 26,749 26,911 27.032 Yearly Increase/Decrease -6 442 -513 57 240 162 121 Yearly lncrease)Decrease°% 1.67% -1.90% 0.22% 0.91% 0.61% 0.45% Total Enrollment Projection 26,523 26,965 26,452 26,509 26.749 26,911 27,032 1 Kindergarten enrollment projection for 2018 is based on Kent$D percentage of live births in King County five years previous. Live births for King County are estimates for years 2022-2023. 2 Kindergarten projection Is calculated by using the District's previous year percentage of King County births five years earlier compared to actual kindergarten enrollment In the previous year. (Excludes EC5E-Early Childhood Special Education preschoolers a Headcount Projectlons for 2019-2023 from OSPI Report 1049-Determination of Projected Enrollments 4 Oct.2017 P223 Headcount is 26,523&FTE 26,113,47,Full Headcount with ECE Preschool&Running Start students=28,192 G R O W T H P R O J E C T I O N S - Adjustments for current economic factors For facilities planning purposes, this six-year enrollment projection anticipates conservative enrollment growth from new development currently in some phase of planning or construction In the district. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 2 April 201E 8 I III Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" In order to determine the capacity of facilities in a school district, King County Code 21A.06 references a "standard of service" that each school district must establish in order to ascertain its overall capacity. The standard of service identifies the program year, the class size, the number of classrooms, students and programs of special need, and other factors determined by the district which would best serve the student population. This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. The District has identified schools with significant special needs programs as "impact" schools and the standard of service targets a lower class size at those facilities. Portables included in the capacity calculation use the same standard of service as the permanent facilities. (See Appendix A, B & C) The standard of service defined herein will continue to evolve in the future. Kent School District is continuing a long-term strategic planning process combined with review of changes to capacity and standard of service. This process will affect various aspects of the District's standard of service and future changes will be reflected in future capital facilities plans. Current Standards of Service for Elements Students Class size for Kindergarten is planned for an average of 23 or fewer students. Class size for grades 1 - 3 is planned for an average of 23 or fewer students. Class size for grades 4 - 6 is planned for an average of 27 or fewer students. Class size for Kindergarten and grades 1, 2 and 3 for schools that qualify for high poverty funding (14 elementary schools for 2017-18) is planned for an average of 17 or fewer students. The state legislature has provided a one year delay in compliance with the requirement to have class sizes of 17 or smaller for grades K- 3. Some special programs require specialized classroom space and the program capacity of some of the buildings housing these programs is reduced. Some students, for example, leave their regular classroom for a short period of time to receive instruction in special programs and space must be allocated to serve these programs. Some students have scheduled time in a computer lab. Students may also be provided music instruction and physical education in a separate classroom or facility. Some identified students will also be provided educational opportunities in classrooms for special programs such as those designated as follows: Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2018 9 English Language Learners (E L L) Education for Disadvantaged Students (Title 1)— Federal Program Learning Assisted Programs (LAP) — State Program Highly Capable Students-State Program Reading, Math or Science Labs Dual Language Programs in 4 elementary schools Inclusive Education Service for Elementary and Secondary students with disabilities may be provided in a separate or self-contained classroom sometimes with a capacity of 10-15 depending on the program; Early Childhood Special Education (ECSE) -3-4 yr. old students with disabilities Tiered Intervention in Inclusive Education Support Center Programs Integrated Programs & Resource Rooms (for special remedial assistance) Self-contained Inclusive Education Support Center Programs (SC) School Adjustment Programs for students with behavioral disorders (SA) Adaptive Support Center for Mild, Moderate & Severe Disabilities (ASCDD) Speech & Language Therapy & Programs for Hearing Impaired students Occupational & Physical Therapy Programs (OT/PT) The Outreach Program (TOP) for 18-21 year old secondary students Some newer buildings have been constructed to accommodate most of these programs; some older buildings have been modified, and in some circumstances, these modifications reduce the classroom capacity of the buildings. When programs change, program capacity is updated to reflect the change in program and capacity. Current Standards of Service for Secondary Students The standards of service outlined below reflect only those programs and educational opportunities provided to secondary students which directly affect the capacity of the school buildings. Class size for grades 7— 8 is planned for an average of 28.6 or fewer students. Class size for grades 9— 12 is planned for an average of 30.6 or fewer students. Similar to Inclusive Education Programs listed above, many other secondary programs require specialized classroom space which can reduce the program capacity of the permanent school buildings. Identified secondary students will also be provided other educational opportunities in classrooms for programs designated as follows: Computer, Multi-Media &Technology Labs & Programs Technology Academy at Kent-Meridian High School & Mill Creek Middle School Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2018 10 Science Programs & Labs — Biology, Chemistry, Physics, Oceanography, Astronomy, Meteorology, Marine Biology, General Science, etc. English Language Learners (E L L) Music Programs— Band, Orchestra, Chorus, Jazz Band, etc. Art Programs—Painting, Design, Drawing, Ceramics, Pottery, Photography, etc. Theater Arts —Drama, Stage Tech, etc. Journalism and Yearbook Classes Highly Capable (Honors or Gifted) and Advanced Placement Programs International Baccalaureate ("IB") Program JROTC - Junior Reserve Officers Training Corps Career&Technical Education Programs (CTE-Vocational Education) Family & Consumer Science — Culinary Arts, Sewing, Careers w/Children/Educ., etc. Child Development Preschool and Daycare Programs Health & Human Services — Sports Medicine, Sign Language, Cosmetology, etc. Business Education —Word Processing, Accounting, Business Law & Math, Marketing, Economics, Web Design, DECA, FBLA (Future Business Leaders). Technical & Industry —Woodworking, Cabinet Making, Building Trades, Metals, Automotive & Manufacturing Technology, Welding, Drafting, Drawing, CAD (Computer-aided Design), Electronics, Engineering & Design, Aviation, ASL, etc. Graphic & Commercial Arts, Media, Photography, Theater & Stage, Ag & Horticulture. Kent Phoenix Academy- Performance Learning Center, Gateway, Virtual High School and Kent Success programs Space or Classroom Utilization As a result of scheduling conflicts for student programs, the need for specialized rooms for certain programs, and the need for teachers to have a work space during their planning periods, it is not possible to achieve 100% utilization of regular teaching stations at secondary schools. Based on the analysis of actual utilization of classrooms, the District has determined that the standard utilization rate is 85% for secondary schools. Program capacity at elementary schools reflects 100% utilization at the elementary level. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilkies Plan April 2018 11 I V Inventory and Capacity of Existing Schools Currently, the District has permanent program capacity to house 27,103 students and transitional (portable) capacity to house 2,085. This capacity is based on the District's Standard of Service as set forth in Section I 11. Included in this Plan is an inventory of the District's schools by type, address and current capacity. (See Table 3 on Page 13). The ratio between permanent capacity and portable capacity is 94.9%-5.1%. The program capacity is periodically updated for changes in programs, additional classrooms and new schools. Program capacity has been updated in this Plan to reflect program changes implemented in the Fall of 2015, For the 2015-2016 school year and beyond the state has a mandated lower class size in 14 elementary schools that are classified as high poverty. The new class size in grades K-1, 2 and 3 will be 17 students for every teacher. Compliance with this new state class size requirement has been delayed to the 2019-20 school year. Calculation of Elementary, Middle School and Senior High School capacities are set forth in Appendices A, B and C. Maps of existing schools are included on Pages 14-16. For clarification, the following is a brief description of some of the non-traditional programs for students in Kent School District: Kent Mountain View Academy serves Grades 3 — 12 with transition, choice and home school assistance programs. It is located in the former Grandview School in the western part of the district in Des Moines. This school was originally designed as an elementary school and is included in the elementary capacity for this Plan. Kent Phoenix Academy is a non-traditional high school opened in fall 2007 in the renovated site and building that formerly served Sequoia Middle School. Kent Phoenix Academy has four special programs including the Performance Learning Center, Gateway, Virtual High School and Kent Success. iGrad - In partnership with Green River College, Kent School District has pioneered the Individualized Graduation and Degree Program or "iGrad". iGrad offers a second chance to students age 16-21 who have dropped out of high school and want to earn a high school diploma. iGrad is not included in this Capital Facilities Plan because it is served in leased space at the Kent Hill Plaza Shopping Center. Over the past three years, enrollment in the iGrad program has averaged over 300 students. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2018 12 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 INVENTORY and CAPACITY of EXISTING SCHOOLS 2017-18 SCHOOL ear ABR ADDRESS Program OYpened Capacity i Carriage Crest Elementary 1990 CC 18235-1401h Avenue BE, Renton 98058 428 Cedar Valley Elementary 1971 CV 26500Timberlone Way BE, Covington 98042 360 Covinglon Elementary 1961 CO 17070 BE Wax Road, Covington 98042 478 Crestwood Elemenlary 1980 CW 25225-180th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 408 East Hill Elementary 1953 EH 9825 S 2401h Street, Kent 98031 464 Emerald Park 1999 EP 11800 BE 216th Street, Kent 98031 477 Falrwood Elementary 1969 FW 16600-148th Avenue BE, Renton 98058 386 Georae T.Daniel Elemenlary 1992 DE 11310 SE 248th Street. Kent 98030 432 Glenridge Elementary 1996 GR 19405-1201h Avenue BE,Renton 98058 431 Grass Lake Elementary 1971 GL 28700-191 at Place BE, Kent 98042 428 Horizon Elementary 1990 HE 27641 -1441h Avenue BE, Kent 98042 477 Jenkins Creek Elementary 1987 JC 26915-1861h Avenue BE, Covington 98042 384 Kent Elementary 1999 KE 24700-641h Avenue South, Kent 98032 454 Kent Valley Early Learning Center 2014 KV 317—4th Ave S,Kent,WA 98032 318 Lake Youngs Elementary 1965 LY 19660-142nd Avenue BE, Kent 98042 497 Martin Sortun Elementary 1987 MS 12711 SE 2481h Street, Kent 98030 455 Meadow Rldoe Elementery 1994 MR 27710.1081h Avenue BE.Kent 98030 454 Meridian Elementary 1939 ME 25621-1401h Avenue BE, Kent 9B042 497 Millennium Elementary 2000 ML 11919 SE 270th Slreel, Kent 98030 478 Neely-O'Brien Elementary 199C NO 6300 South 2361h Street, Kent 98032 454 Panther Lake Elementary 2009 PL 20831-1081h Avenue BE, Kent 98031 497 Park Orchard Elementary 1963 PO 11010 USE 232nd Street, Kent 98031 463 Pine Tree Elementary 1967 PT 27825-1181h Avenue BE, Kent 98030 487 Ridgewood Elementary 1987 RW 18030-162nd Place BE, Renton 98058 477 Sawyer Woods Elementary 1994 SW 31135.2281h Ave BE,Black Diamond 98010 477 Scenic Hill Elementary 1960 SH 26025 Woodland Way South, Kent 98030 454 Scos Creek Elementary 1971 SC 12651 BE 218th Place, Kent 98031 360 Springbrook Elementary 1969 SS 20035-100th Avenue BE, Kent 98031 396 Sunrise Elementary 1992 SR 22300-132nd Avenue BE, Kent 90042 477 Elementary TOTAL 12,048 Cedar Heights Middle School 1993 CH 19640 BE 272 Street,Covington 98042 895 Mattson Middle School 1981 MA 16400 SE 251s1 Street, Covington 98042 787 Meeker Middle School 1970 MK 12600 BE 192nd Street, Renton 98058 832 Meridian Middle School 1958 MM 23480-1201h Avenue BE, Kent 98031 792 MITI Creek Middle School 2005 MC 620 North Central Avenue, Kent 98032 916 Northwood Middle School 1995 NW 17007 BE 184th Street, Renton 98058 926 Middle School TOTAL 5,148 Kent-Meddlan High School 1951 KM 10020 BE 256th Street. Kent 98030 1,904 Kentlake Senior High School 1997 KL 21401 BE 3001h Street,Kent 98042 1,967 Kentritlge Senior High School 1968 KR 12430 BE 2081h Street, Kent 98031 2,277 Kentwood Senlor High School 1981 KW 25B00-1641h Avenue BE, Covington 98042 2,159 Senior High TOTAL 8,297 Kent Mountain View Academy 1997 MVILC 22420 Mililary Road, Des Molnes 98198 396 Kent Phoenix Academy 2007 PH 11000 SE 2641h Street, Kent 98030 414 DISTRICT TOTAL F 2-77103 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 3 April 2018 ,. _« . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | | }/ ° ; yy o . ... � , . @&2 :)i a&mnzm mzlPPISIOWWI p, . . . . . . . � z< $b( , r!! lz §! 4§ /'\ � < ! �h ■ � . . . . . . � ` podallid owaCj ,4mLOZ Ilej , . wGloo q 4uo) ' Kent School vdrict Fall 216/17 Demographic&@, \\ / ' /\\ . q� _ . � $ . EEO2 Z§q &e§ \\q . Q2@ . ApHI w ° �z mm g » 16 I V Six-Year Planning and Construction Plan In November 2017, the voters of the Kent School District approved a bond measure for $252 million. This new bonding authority will provide for a replacement for Covington Elementary school (with increased capacity due to growth), a new elementary school in the Kent Valley (site to be determined), twenty additional classrooms throughout the district as well as other infrastructure projects. At the time of preparation of this Plan in spring of 2017, the following projects to increase capacity either are in the planning phase or will start in spring 2017. Planning is complete for a replacement school for Covington Elementary School in first quarter of 2019. The project will start in spring of 2017 with planned completion in fall 2018.The project is funded with a combination of bond funds (bonds issued in February 2017), state assistance and impact fees, Planning is in progress for an additional elementary school in the Kent Valley in 2020 or beyond. The project will be funded with bonds funds and impact fees. • Planning is in progress to add an additional 20 classrooms to elementary schools. The locations will be determined by need. The project will be funded with bonds funds and impact fees. 0 Enrollment projections reflect future need for additional capacity at the elementary school level. Future facility and site needs are reflected in this Plan. Some funding for lease or purchase of additional portables may be provided by impact fees as needed. Sites are based on need for additional capacity. As a critical component of capital facilities planning, county and city planners and decision-makers are encouraged to consider safe walking conditions for all students when reviewing applications and design plans for new roads and developments. This should include sidewalks for pedestrian safety to and from school and bus stops as well as bus pull-outs and turn-arounds for school buses. Included in this Plan is an inventory of potential projects and sites identified by the District which are potentially acceptable site alternatives in the future. (See Table a on Page 18&Site map on Page 19). Voter approved bond issues have included funding for the purchase of sites for some of these and future schools, and the sites acquired to date are included in Kent School District six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2018 17 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.415 Site Acquisitions and Projects Planned to Provide Additional Capacity Projected PraJacled %for SCHOOL / FACILITY 1 SITE LOCATION Type 1 Status Complaeon Program new Data capacity Growth '� hgprexlmata ACWroxlmpGa I don ELEMENTARY Map Replacement 5 Replacement for Covington Elementary BE 25811h Street&1541h Ave BE Elementary in pmymcs Fall 2018 630 24% Covington Elem- Capacity to be replaced 9118 17070 BE Wax Road, Covington Elementary Utilized A78 Elementary New Elementary School Kent Valley Addition Planning 2020-2021 600 lco Elementary 20 Additional Permanent Classrooms Various schools where needed Addition Planning 2010-2022 400 100% MIDDLE SCHOOL&SENIOR HIGH No new projects required for Secondary Schools at this lime&Secondary Schools are excluded from Impact Fee formula. TEMPORARY FACILITIES Additional .......... ................ILIT................. Capacity Portables' TBD-For placement as needed New Planning 2018+ 24-3101ch 100% M.; ' OTHER SITES ACQUIRED Land use Land Use Mep Nsloneuon Tyne Jurisdiction 4 Covington area North (Near Maltson MS) BE 251 &164 BE, Covington 98042 Urban Elementary City of Covington 6 Covington area West (Halleson-Wikstrom) BE 266&164 SE, Covington 98042 Urban Elementary City of Covington 3 Ham Lake area (Pollard) 1BB20 BE 240, Kent 98042 Rural Elementary King County 8 BE of Lake Morton area (West property) BE 332&204 BE, Kent 98042 Rural Secondary King County 2 Shady Lk area(Sowers,Blaine,Drahola,Parollne) 17426 BE 192 Street, Renton 98058 Urban Elementary King County 12 South Central site (Yoh-Wms) BE 2861h St&124th Ave BE,Auburn 98092 Urban TBD King County Notes: ' TBD-To be determined-Some sites are Identified but placement,liming andror configuration of portables has not been determined Numbers correspond to sites on Site Bank Map on Page 19.Other Map silo locations are parcels identified in Table 7 on Page 29. Kent School District Slx-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 4 April 2018 18 a m o °k L fall �a BSn�V'4VBJt 0 ti F `'bd "" Ymnu97 V� I�f DOpWPI KentSOODI 13tO1Qt Sbc-YuarCppb1 FmQfl1t a Ran 19 I this Plan. Some funding is secured for purchase of additional sites but some may be funded with impact fees as needed. Not all undeveloped properties meet current school construction requirements and some property may be traded or sold to meet future facility needs. The Board of Directors has started the process to sell surplus property in the spring of 2015. The Board will continue annual review of standard of service and those decisions will be reflected in the each update of the Capital Facilities Plan. V I Portable Classrooms The Plan references use of portable as interim or transitional capacity and facilities, Currently, the District utilizes portables to house students in excess of permanent capacity and for program purposes at some school locations. (Please see Appendices A, B, C) Based on enrollment projections, implementation of full day kindergarten programs, lower state mandated class size, program capacity and the need for additional permanent capacity, the District anticipates the need to purchase or lease additional portables during the next six-year period. During the time period covered by this Plan, the District does not anticipate that all of the District's portables will be replaced by permanent facilities. During the useful life of some of the portables, the school-age population may decline in some communities and increase in others, and these portables provide the flexibility to accommodate the immediate needs of the community. Portables may be used as interim or transitional facilities; 1. To prevent overbuilding or overcrowding of permanent school facilities. 2. To cover the gap between the times of demand for increased capacity and completion of permanent school facilities to meet that demand. 3. To meet unique program requirements. Portables currently in the District's inventory are continually evaluated resulting in some being improved and some replaced. The Plan projects that the District will use portables to accommodate interim housing needs for the next six years and beyond. The use of portables, their impacts on permanent facilities, life cycle and operational costs, and the Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilitles Plan Aprll 2018 20 i i interrelationship between portables, emerging technologies and educational restructuring will continue to be examined. V I I Projected Six-Year Classroom Capacity As stated in Section IV, the program capacity study is periodically updated for changes in special programs and reflects class size requirements, class size fluctuations etc. As shown in the Inventory and Capacity chart in Table 3 on Page 13, the program capacity is also reflected in the capacity and enrollment comparison charts. (sea Tables 5&SA-B-C on pages 22-25). Enrollment is electronically reported to OSPI on Form P-223 on a monthly basis and funding apportionment is based on Annual Average FTE (AAFTE). The first school day of October is widely recognized as the enrollment "snapshot in time"to report enrollment for the year. Kent School District continues to be the fifth largest district (both FTE and headcount basis) in the state of Washington. Kent School District continues to be the fifth largest district (both file and headcount basis) in the state of Washington. P-223 Headcount for October 2017 was 26,523 with kindergarten students counted at 1.0 and excluding ECSE and college-only Running Start students. A full headcount of all students enrolled in October 2017 totals 28,192, which include ECSE and college-only Running Start students. In October 2017, there were 1,118 students in 11th and 12th grade participating in the Running Start program at different colleges and receiving credits toward both high school and college graduation. Five hundred ninety-three of these students attended classes only at the college ('college-only") and are excluded from FTE and headcount for capacity and enrollment comparisons. Kent School District has one of the highest Running Start program participation rates in the state. ,Based on the enrollment forecasts, permanent facility inventory and capacity, current standard of service, portable capacity, and future additional classroom space, the District plans to continue to satisfy concurrency requirements through the trans ItionaI use of portables. (See Table 5 and Tables 5 A-S.0 on Pages 22-25). This does not mean that some schools will not experience overcrowding. There may be a need for additional portables and/or new schools to accommodate growth within the District. New schools may be designed to accommodate placement of future portables. School attendance area changes, limited and costly movement of portables, zoning changes, market conditions, and educational restructuring will all play a major role in addressing overcrowding and underutilization of facilities in different parts of the District. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2018 21 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY I TOTAL DISTRICT SCHOOL YEAR e017-18 201e-19 201s-2o 2o2o-z1 2021-22 zo2z-zs Actual P R O J E C T E D (..Permanent Program Capacity ' 27,103 27,103 27,103 27,103 27,323 27,443 Changes to Permanent Capacity t Capacity Increase(F) Replacement school with projected Increase In capacity'. Covington Elementary Replacement (u) 2 630 To Replace current Covington Elementary rapacity -478 New Elementary School in Kent Valley; 600 Additional Permanent Classrooms 120 120 120 120 Permanent Program Capacity Subtotal 27,103 27,103 27,375 27,223 28,043 27,563 Interim Portable Capacity 4 Elementary Portable Capacity Required 1,656 1,728 1,440 1,248 456 336 Middle School Portable Capacity Required 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 Senior High School Portable Capedlty Required ➢ 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,656 1,728 1,440 1,248 456 336 TOTAL CAPACITY ' 28,759 28,831 28,815 28,471 28,499 27.899 TOTAL ENROLLMENT/PROJECTION s 26,523 26.965 26,452 26,509 26.749 26;911 DISTRICT AVAILABLE CAPACITY 2.236 1,866 2.363 1,962 1.750 988 ' Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 Replacement school for Covington Elementary will increase capacity and will be built on a different existing urban site. 3 New Elementary School on site in Kent Valley to be determined, 4 2016-17 total classroom portable capacity is 1440, Some additional relocatable used for program purposes. ' Actual October Headcount Enrollment with Projections from OSPI Report 1049-Determination of Projected Enrollments. d School capacity meets concurrency requirements and no impact fees are proposed for secondary schools. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 April 2018 22 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY i ELEMENTARY - Grades K - 6 SCHOOL YEAR 2017-16 2D16-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021.22 2022-23 1 2023-24 r Actual P R O J E C T E ❑ Elementary Permanent Capacity 1 13,244 13,244 13,244 13,516 13,636 14,356 14,476 Changes to Elementary Capacity Covington Elementary Replacement (u)3 630 Will replace current Covington Elementary capacity -478 New Elementary School in Kent Valley 600 Additional Permanent Classrooms" 120 120 120 120 120 Subtotal 13,244 13,244 13,516 13,636 14,356 14,476 14,596 Portable Capacity Required ' 1656 1728 1440 1248 456 336 336 TOTAL CAPACITY112 14,900 14,972 14,956 14,884 14,812 14,B12 14,932 Adjusted for FULL Day Kinder arten Headcount ENROLLMENT/PROJECTIONS 14,910 14,968 14,915 14,838 14,763 14,757 14,757 SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY -10 4 41 46 49 55 175 Number of Portables Required 69 72 60 52 19 14 14 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 Kent Mountain View Academy is a special program serving students in Grades 3- 12, The school building (formerly Kent Learning Center&Grandview Elem.)was designed as an elementary school. a Replacement school for Covington Elementary will increase capacity and is planned for a different existing urban site. "Additional classrooms will be placed at schools with the greatest need for sieve overcrowding s Actual October Headcount Enrollment with Projections from OSPI Report 1049-Determination of Projected Enrollments. Enrollment& Projections reflect FULL Day Kindergarten at ALL Elementary schools @ 1.0&exclude ECSE Preschoolers. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 A April 2016 23 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY MIDDLE SCHOOL - Grades 7 - 8 SCHOOL YEAR 2017-18 2018-19 1 2019-20 2020-21 1 2021-22 2022-23 Actual P R O J E C T Middle School Permanent Capacity ' 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 No Changes tc Middle School Capacity Subtotal 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 Portable Capacity Required ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL CAPACITY 1&3 5.148 5,148 5,148 5.148 5.148 5.148 ENROLLMENT/PROJECTION s 3.986 4,068 4,335 4,463 4,476 4,397 SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 1,162 1.080 813 685 672 751 Number of Portables Required 0 0 0 0 0 0 No Classroom Portables required at middle schools at this time.Some Portables used for classroom and program purposes. ' Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program ct 2 Actual October Headcount Enrollment with Projections from OSPI Report 1049-Determination of Projected Ent 3 Surplus capacity due to grade level reconfiguration -All 9th grade students moved to the high schools in F Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 B April 2018 24 I KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 416 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY SENIOR HIGH - Grades 9 - 12 SCHOOL YEAR 2017-18 201e-19 1 2019-20 2020-21 2021-z2 zoz2•z9 Actual P R O J E C T 11 Senior High Permanent Capacity ' 8,711 8,711 8,711 8,711 8,711 8,711 Includes Kent Phoenix Academy 2 No Changes to High School CapaclN Subtotal 8,711 8,711 8,711 8,711 8,711 8,711 Portables Capacity Required 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL CAPACITY ' 8.711 8,711 8,711 8.711 8,711 8,711 ENROLLMENT/PROJECTION ' 71536 7.416 7,259 7,448 7,672 7,878 SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 1,175 1,295 1,452 1,253 1,039 833 Number of Portables Required 0 0 0 0 0 0 No Classroom Portables required at this time.Some Portables used for classroom and program purposes. ' Capacity Is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program ct 2 Kent Phoenix Academy opened In Fall 2007 serving grades 9-12 with four special programs. ' Actual October Enrollment with Projections from OSPI Report 1049-Determination of Projected Enrollments. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 C April 2018 25 I I V I I I Finance Plan The finance plan shown on Table 6 demonstrates how the Kent School District plans to finance improvements for the years 2017-2018 through 2022-2023, The financing components include secured and unsecured funding and impact fees. The plan is based on future bond issues, state school construction assistance, collection of impact fees under the State Growth Management Act and voluntary mitigation fees paid pursuant to State Environmental Policy Act. The plan calls for the replacement of Covington Elementary in 2018-19 which will increase the capacity of the current school by approximately 20%. Some impact fees will be utilized as part of the finance plan. The plan also includes an additional elementary school in the Kent Valley and the siting will be determined at a later date. The district does have two sites where the school could be placed and a decision has not been made. This new school will increase the capacity at the elementary level by 600 students. Some impact fees are scheduled to be part of the overall finance plan. To address overcrowding at our elementary schools, the plan also includes twenty additional permanent classrooms at the schools of the greatest need. A decision as to the placing of these classrooms has not been made. These classrooms will be at the schools with the most overcrowding. Some impact fees are scheduled to be part of the overall finance plan. In November 2016, the District held a special election to approve the authorization of $252,000,000 in bonding authority. The projects described above are part of this authorization. The first series of bonds ($80 million) were issued in February 2017, which will fund the replacement of Covington Elementary as well as other infrastructure projects. The Finance Plan includes new portables to be purchased or leased to provide additional capacity and some may be funded from impact fees. Enrollment projections reflect future need for additional capacity at the elementary level and unfunded facility needs will be reviewed in the future and reported in annual updates of the Capital Facilities Plan. No impact fees are requested for secondary schools in this Plan. For the Six-Year Finance Plan, costs of future schools are based on estimates from Kent School District Facilities Department. Please see pages 27-28 for a summary of the cast basis. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2018 26 i i V I I I Finance Plan - Cost Basis Summary For impact fee calculations, construction costs are based on cost of the last elementary school, adjusted for inflation, and projected cost of the future elementary schools and additional classrooms. Elementary School Cost Projected Cost Cost of Panther Lake Elementary $26,700,000 Replacement (Opened in Fall 2009) Projected cost- Covington Elementary $46,077,470 Replacement (Projected to open in 2018) Projected cost of New Elementary School $46,000,000 Kent Valley (Projected to open in 2020) 20 Additional permanent Classrooms $16,829,000 Site Acquisition Cost The site acquisition cost is based on an average cost of sites purchased or built on within the last ten years. Please see Table 7 on page 29 for a list of site acquisition costs and averages. District Adjustment The impact fee calculations on pages 31 and 32 include a "District Adjustment' which is equal to the amount of increase that the impact fee formulas total for this year and adjusted for the increase in the Consumer Price Index (2.6%) for the Seattle metropolitan area. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2018 27 at Ct \ \ # \wI k k r § / ( $ \ m o e � } z ) � m ° \ CD 07 0 [ § cn ° ' « \ . \ \ /LU 2p flF7 ; \ f W ® � / ! s E § 2 § ) k 0 2 \ \ ƒ \ § Z - ! { f � ( k � ) ` ! { \ { { / { ) - } { / ) & \ / ( ) 7 i / f f { ƒ k f , / ; ƒ / ) � ® � \ 28 i yyy ac •N `�° � N h app '9 Vs y N Um N � N M m ° a € 60� S Q m M M O O 6 EOO IND O O N O O N 01 O V oD W O O M co e0 t+l M ep O V y Wi 6'i cp 69 m IA 69 M 6M9 a � a Q N m r3W p�j of o nti cV N N r of d. c m m Z O ; N O N O O W g W a S a g 6 d v y g = m O � i7 J in {Zpn J inU) (V Q N m_ W O 7 £ 0 O N N co co V N Y m mar sN � � ILLU s Y N 9 S ID G a � N =O T C N C (n E n T 15 o r6 w E 'n °i L E ry W N .._W. Y yJ J NN N) [Y( 4 O S } a a W a Y 2 w n n 6 12 2 S = e" 0 _ e a � F 7 j 29 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT FACTORS FOR ESTIMATED IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS Student Generation Factors -Single Family Student Generation Factors -Multi-Family Elementary (Grades K-6) 0.398 Elementary 0.117 Middle School (Grades 7-8) 0.096 Middle School 0.028 Senior High (Grades 9- 12) 0.185 Senior High 0.029 Total 0.679 Total 0.174 Projected Increased Student Capacity OSPI-Square Footage per Student Elementary 2,516 Elementary 90 Middle School 0 Middle School 117 Senior High Addition 0 Senior High 130 Special Education 144 Required Site Acreage per Facility Elementary (required) 11 Average Site Cost I Acre Middle School (required) 21 Elementary $109,967 Senior High (required) 32 Middle School $686,883 Senior High $524,564 New Facility Construction Cost Elementary' $46,077,470 Temporary Facility Capacity & Cost Middle School $0 Elementary @ 24 $125,000 Senior High " $0 Middle School @ 29 $0 See cost basis on Pg.26 Senior High @ 31 $0 Temporary Facility Square Footage State Funding Assistance Credit Elementary 142.980 District Funding Assistance Percentage 56.96% Middle School 10,736 Senior High 22.192 Total 5.1% 175,908 Construction Cost Allocation CCA-Cost/Sq,Ft. (Effective July 2016) $213.23 Permanent Facility Square Footage Elementary (Includes KMVA) 1,470,543 Middle School 660,904 District Average Assessed Value Senior High 1,110,415 Single Famlly Residence $328,047 Total 94.9% 3.241,862 Total Facilities Square Footage District Average Assessed Value Elementary 1,613.523 Multi-Family Residence $143.332 Middle School 671,640 Senior High 1,132,607 Total 3,417,770 Bond Levy Tax Rate/$1,000 Current I$1,000 Tax Rate $1.03 Developer Provided Sites/Facilities Value 0 General Obligation Bond Interest Rate Dwelling Units 0 Current Bond Interest Rate 3.95% CPI Inflation Factor 2.60% Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2018 30 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Site Acquisition Cost per Single Family Residence Formula: ((Acres x Cost per Aare)I FacilityCapacity)x Student Generation Factor Required site Acreage I Average Site CosUAcre I Facility Capacity Slutlem Factor A 1 (Elementary) 11 $109,967 630 0.398 $764.19 A 2 (Middle School) 21 $0 1,065 0.070 $0 A 3 (Senior High) 32 so 1,000 0.138 $0 0.606 A b $764.19 Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Single Family Residence Formula, ((Facility Cost/Facility Capacity)x Student Factor)x(Permanent/"fotal Square Footage Ratio Coostruollon cost FeGlity Capacity Sludanl Factor FooleAe Ratio B 1 (Elementary) $46.077,470 630 0.398 0A03 $26,265.66 B 2 (Middle School) $0 900 0.096 0.984 $0 B 3 (Senior High) $0 1,600 00.1105 0.998 $0 0.679 B b $26,285.66 Temporary Facility Cost per Single Family Residence Formula: ((Facility Cost/Faailil.Ca sail x Student Factor)x(TemporaryI Total Square rootage Ratio FaGllly Cost Facility Capacity I Student Factor I Footage hello C1 (Elementary) $125,000 24 0.396 0.097 $201.07 C 2 (Middle School) $o 29 0,070 0.016 $0 C 3 (Senior High) $0 31 0,138 0.02 $0 0.606 C 41 $201.07 State Funding Assistance Credit per Single Family Residence (formerly"State Match") Formula: Area Cost Allowance x SPI Square Feet per student x Funding Assistance% x Student Factor '.. Conelruclion Coal Nlorallon SPI SCI,Ft./Student Assistance°rb Student Factor D 1 (Elementary) $225.97 90 0.5696 0.398 $4,610.46 D 2 (Middle School) $225.97 117 0 0.096 $0 D 3 (Senior High) $225.97 130 0 0.185 $0 D $4,610.48 Tax Credit per Single Family Residence Average SF Residential Assessed Value $366.437 Current Debt Service Rate/$1,000 $1.03 Current Bond Interest Rate 3.95% Years Amodlzed (10Years) 10 TC b $2,220.95 Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility/Site Value Dwetlln Units 0 0 FC b 0 Fee Recap A - Site Acquisition per SF Residence $764.19 B - Permanent Facility Cost per Residence $26,285,66 C = Temporary Facility Cast per Residence $201.07 Subtotal $27,25D.92 D = State Match Credit per Residence $4.610.48 TC=Tax Credit per Residence $2,220.95 Subtotal $6,831.44 Total Unfunded Need $20,419.48 50%Developer Fee Obligation $10,210 FC=Facility Credit(if applicable) 0 District Adjustment(see page 28 for explanation) (4.,813 Net Fee Obligation per Residence-Single Family $5,$97 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2018 31 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENCE Site Acquisition Cost per Multi-Family Residence Unit Formula: ((Acres x Cost n Aera)!Faciiil Capaell )x Student Generation Factor Repulretl Slte Acreage Average Slte CpsVAore Facility Capacity Sludenl Factor A l (Elementary) 11 - $109 967 630 0,117 $224.66 A 2 (Middle School) 21 $0 1,065 0.028 $0 A 3 (Senior High) 32 $0 1,000 0,029 $0 0.174 A b $224.65 Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Multi-Family Residence Unit Formula: ((Facili(y Cost!Fao411 Capacli i x Student Factor)x(Permanent/Total S uare Footage Ratio) ConsnucUon Cost Facility Capacity _I Sludenl Factor FodCagr9 RaUe B 1 (Elementary) $46,077.470 630 0,117 0,903 $7,727.19 B 2 (Middle School) $0 1,065 0.028 0,984 $0 B3 (Senior High) $0 1,600 0.029 0.998 $0 0.174 S $7,727.19 Temporary Facility Cost per Multi-Family Residence Unit Formula: ((Facility Cost/Facility Capacity)x Student Factor)x oN mpora /Total Square Foota a ReClo FacilityFacilityCost Facility CeoaU Student Factor Footage Rollo C 1 (Elementary) $125,000 24 0,117 0,097 $59,11 C 2 (Middle School) $0 29 0.028 0.016 $0 03 (Senior Hlgh) $0 31 0.029 0.02 $0 0.174 C b $59.11 State Funding Assistance Credit per Multi-Family Residence (formerly"Stale Match") Formula: Area Cost Allowance x SPI Square Feet per student x FundingAssistance% x Student Factor Amax Cos!AllnM1vanco SPI Sq.Fl./Student I Equalization% Sludenl Factor D 1 (Elementary) $22697 90 0.5696 0.117 $1,355.34 D 2 (Middle School) $225,97 117 0 0.022 $0 3 (Senior High) $225,97 130 0 0.039 $0 D a $1,355.34 Tax Credit per Multi-Famlly Residence Unit Average MF Residential Assessed Value $143.332 Current Debt Service Rate 1$1,0D0 $1.03 Current Bond Interest Rate 3.95% Years Amodized (10Years) 10 TC a $1,156,85 Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility/Site Value OweXfrn. Units 0 0 FC b 0 Fee Recap A = Site Acquisition per Mulll-Family Unit $224.65 8 = Permanent Facility Cost per MF Unit $7,727A9 C - Temporary Facility Cost per MF Unit $59.11 Subtotal $8,010.95 D = State Match Credit per MF Unit $1,355.34 TC=Tax Credit per MF Unit $1,156.85 Subtotal - $2,512A9 Total Unfunded Need $5,498.76 50%Developer Fee Obligation $2,749 FC=Facility Credit(if applicable) 0 District Adjustment(see page 28 for explanation) ($412) Net Fee Obligation per Residential Unit-Multi-famlly $2,279 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2018 32 I IX Summary of Changes to June 2018 Capital Facilities Plan The Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") is updated annually based on previous Plans in effect since 1993. The primary changes from the May 2018 Plan are summarized here. Changes to capacity continue to reflect fluctuations in class size as well as program changes. Changes in portables or transitional capacity reflect use, lease or purchase, sale, surplus and/or movement between facilities. The student headcount enrollment forecast is updated annually. All Elementary schools now have Full Day Kindergarten so six-year Kindergarten projections were previously modified to meet the requirements for Full Day Kindergarten programs at all elementary schools. The district expects to receive some State Funding Assistance (formerly called "state matching funds") for projects in this Plan and tax credit factors are updated annually. Unfunded site and facility needs will be reviewed in the future. The impact fees for 2018 will increase by the percentage increase of the consumer price index for the Seattle metropolitan area in. For 2017, the increase was 3.1%. For single-family residences, the fee will increase by $162 to $5,397. The impact fee for multi-family units will increase by $69 to $2,279. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2018 33 Changes to Impact Fee Calculation Factors include: ITEM GradelType FROM TO Comm Student Generation Factor Elem 0.257 0.398 Single Family(SF) MS 0.070 0.096 SH 0.138 0.185 Total 0.465 0.679 0.214Increase Student Generation Factor Elem 0.111 0.117 Multi-Family(MF) MS 0.022 0,028 SH 0.039 0,029 Total 0.172 0,174 0.002Increase State Funding Assistance Ratios("State Match") 56.96% 56.96% Per OSPI Website Area Cost Allowance $213.23 $225.97 Per OSPI Website Average Assessed Valuation (AV) SF $307,784 $366 437 Puget Sound ESD AV-Average of Condominiums &Apts. MF $123,109 $143,332 Puget Sound ESD Debt Service Capital Levy Rate/$1000 $1.398 $1.0269 Per King Co. Assessor Report General Obligation Bond Interest Rate 3.27% 3.95% Bond Buyers 20 year GO Index Impact Fee-Single Family SF $5,235 $5,397 Increase of$162 or 3.1% Impact Fee- Multi-Family MF $2,210 $2,279 Increase of$69 or 3.1% Kent School District Six-Year Capital Faciiltles Plan April 2015 34 i m S Z a Z z a A z r Y z z z Y A z Y i A A r Z z r A A z z I $a Y gg yy w J Q q $ O O y S N (I 10 M 0 W n f0 M1 P n ry O N N Yl N N OI M Vl Q N .� W Y M1 m {�j� OO N b 1. pp11 �y 0p MM fOV. W 9 M b Nn(1 0 V Y b Yml b N N a Q K ONNN � LLn�� C� wT. QE g N A U gN ' IrL � i � � 6 q y J w W i y� G. M1 rypE. .. EE i 2 rza� N R x J Z a u S h W R « a 2 A o 8 Si b o mn o m �o „ Y IL m ,v �q o y Q N a 2 i I-z y a N d NNy a ry d n a a a a a a M o % @ & IL -6LU E � m � . Z LLJ N O n � e yak W O L L G E Q v N Y g z u'S ck h p 2 Xp k Tye g T. E U W W tt66TT O (9 Y Y i f E E C Nw N r m e m O 5 Y 35 m o W O J W N W O N O O N yC L�d�j S 11 o O� � E � ., S $ S S g o rn m •- $ a i a b b ih O] Q N V U w � a W P a �'.. ry � � � � 0 6 O w W G0.EQ�+ U m Tpp V n rIi j ppppry 4 O O N O 1'1 'y� ary O O N m m 'M mU a V C C y H OO G� m LLL IL N Q O Q O 6 O 15 O N O y� wEE 8 m « m `a ry� .Np n E@ pp n E {y M q �!S ZK gq�11 �ryq Omi M1m m r N p� W �O p, tTl Ol W N N F.J pk a0 M1 ui m p a0 N {V lV ry m V nj tQREI i C rIL "oi tV Gy rn V K LL Q a E u! 0 W gg H .%, v e W CL IL V yp$ p ry� rU �ry ry � b p W10, ri ¢ Il ^ 0'1 n Bi vl 4fi QI W w i[1 h M O m Q y� N V m m m N m N B W W U N m L H LL m M M ] a Y+ O C1 U u} N y iVLSj! M1 N m c'� 0 �p ry 16 WVI M N N N M [1 r # Im(1 N 1b0 G N OM1i 4 w E m s w g u a Eli fn E Y 36 Kent School District Fall 2016/17 Demographic Report • CISIi' .^le I' t .aluti + v laief• I .:7.e1,•.el(al al i'v(61i r. Renton S U.Illr\I ry ftlYa(I en 1�+ Haigh. IYA grit` Ste Tukwila.SVl�r�._o- a Maplewood �Y Elhou n ,. u n' ae nRrlinn finle ql�n y HM. It 3de Vnt, NolBhis a .v m _ Cadetn oonoaln •' Unit,!: •+ = 6rlllld Sfuop.St rn Spiny,.. 15! °IIAt rt, Coda,arava G•1a`J a S ladnr YI Seratac '" ¢wvws�wimwrven"fw.uwwwmmmtif?ti0}2 1]I .. e'edon .4E'toNp.al n >13n $ � n o _ x l i BI " 56 a2nn c: 73a111$1 „ ,�w�m��pp sE as:�nn sl Maple vnIBB'. Idld We,w r Yllltlonlas6 'I o 4 _ SF x.tpinenp Whig, _ 9 +1 Kent J 5 el! NWattle K d iF, 15Glli NI 't Star Lake Covington Caerokae ( cE?�F n s' u 6aY Park 3ppp+A`t+]n�+41+w.e.nr n N 7ha,ro $ . a Mafadtn ^ y C eslh titoLI 9:Nq' I Bmrydalo 91 1.: 1e sty u ? Lan Hill p SE 31LI'S1 ft c .. ".`Uynrneq 1U1 'sg a' g'' F lt hloln'st Auburn 5 r 15w 51 Syr n %•irrna nfeen fllvef �L 'Yol",F Apartment re 16' ml Multi-family attached 41 s Single family detached 0 -1 2 3 'Miles A c. .� 'yE Ititlar97 District Apal 19,2017 ». - .r •.. .....�� A FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Each Scholar: A voice. A dream. A BRIGHT future, W! Thomas Jefferson High School Mirror Lake Elementary School I F rs Wildwood Elementary School Lake Grove Elementary School CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAIN' 2019 I FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2019 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN May 29,2018 BOARD OF EDUCATION Hiroshi Eto Carol Gregory Geoffery McAnalloy Mildred 0118e Claire Wilson SUPERINTENDENT Dr.Tammy Campbell Prepared by: Sally D. McLean, Chief Finance&Operations Officer Jennifer Wojciechowski, Student& Demographic Forecaster FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2019 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 2-3 SECTION 1 THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Introduction 4 Inventory of Educational Facilities 5 Inventory of Non-Instructional Facilities 6 Needs Forecast- Existing Facilities 7 Needs Forecast- New Facilities 8 Six Year Finance Plan 9 SECTION 2 MAPS Introduction 10 Map- Elementary Boundaries 11 Map- Middle School Boundaries 12 Map - High School Boundaries 13 Map—City and County Jurisdictions 14 SECTION S UPPORT DOCUMENTATION Introduction 15 Building Capacities 16-18 Portable Locations 19-20 Student Forecast 21-23 SECTION 4 KING COUNTY, CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, AND CITY OF KENT IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS Introduction 24 Capacity Summaries 25-29 Impact Fee Calculations 30-31 Reference to Impact Fee Calculations 32-33 Student Generation Rates 34 Impact Fee Changes from 2018 to 2019 35 t FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2019 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN INTRODUCTION In response to the requirements of the State of Washington Growth Management Act (SHB) 2929 (1990) and ESHB 1025 (1991)), and under the School Impact Fee Ordinances of King County Code 21 A, City of Federal Way Ordinance No. 95-249 effective December 21, 1995 as amended, City of Kent Ordinance No3260 effective March 1996, and the City of Auburn Ordinance No. 5078 effective 1998, Federal Way Public Schools has updated its 2019 Capital Facilities Plan as of Nlay 2018. This Plan is scheduled for adoption by King County, the City of Kent, City of Federal Way and the City of Auburn and is incorporated in the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction by reference. This plan is also included in the Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. To date,the City of Des Moincs has not adopted a school impact fee ordinance. The City of Des Moines collects school impact fees as part of the SEPA process. The Growth Management Act requires the County to designate Urban Growth areas within which urban growth can be encouraged. The Growth Management Planning Council adopted and recommended to the King County Council four Urban Gowth Area Line Maps with designations for urban centers. A designation was made within the Federal Way planning area, which encompasses Federal Way Public Schools boundaries. King County will encourage and actively support the development of Urban Centers to meet the region's need for housing, jobs, services, culture, and recreation. This Plan's estimated population growth is prepared with this underlying assumption. This Capital Facilities Plan will be used as documentation for any jurisdiction, which requires its use to meet the needs of the Growth Management Act. This plan is not intended to be the sole planning tool for all of the District needs. The District may prepare interim plans consistent with Board policies or management need. During the 2016-17 school year the District formed it 100 member Facilities Planning Committee consisting of parents, community members and staff. The Committee was tasked with developing a recommendation to the Superintendent regarding Phase 2 of the District's plan for school construction, remodeling, and/or modernization for voter consideration in November 201 1. The voters passed this$450M bond authorization with a 67% YES vote reflecting a commitment to invest in the modernization of our infrastructure. Through the committee's work a determination was made to rebuild Thomas Jefferson High School, Illahee Middle School,Totem Middle School, Lake Grove Elementary, Minor Lake Elementary, Olympic View Elementary, Star Lake Elementary, and W itdwood Elementary. In additien to the school projects, the committee included a plan to modernize Memorial Stadium, which currently supports athletic activities for all schools. The rebuilding of the aforementioned schools will create additional capacity for students at the elementary and high school levels. The expanded capacity supplants the need for additional elementary schools. 2 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2019 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN INTRODUCTION continued As we are in the planning stages for the newly approved bond projects, we are entering the final phase of the $106 million project replacing Federal Way High School. The new facility will increased capacity by approximately 200 students and is expected to be completed by winter 2018. The costs of this additional capacity is excluded from the 2019 school impact fee calculations. The District continues to monitor factors that may have an impact on enrollment and capacity at our schools. In accordance with the McCleary decision, the State has provided funding to reduce K-3 class size to 17 and 4-12 class size to 25. Initiative Measure No. 1351 would further reduce these class sizes in schools where more than 50"0 of students were eligible for free and reduced-price meals in the prior year. Under this measure, class sizes in those schools would be reduced to 15 in grades K-3,22 in grade 4, and 23 in grades 5-12. The additional class size reductions required by Initiative 1351 would increase our classroom need from 60 to 120 at our Elementary& K-8 schools and add a need for an additional 26 classrooms at our Secondary schools. We will also continue to study school boundaries as new housing and fluctuating populations impact specific schools. Some shifts in boundaries may be required in the coming years. At this time with more than 1,000 unhoused elementary students, boundary adjustments cannot resolve the need for additional capacity. The maps included in this Plan reflect the boundaries for the 2018-19 school year. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2019 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 1 - THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN i The State Growth Management Act requires that several pieces of information be gathered to determine the facilities available and needed to meet the needs of a growing community. This section provides information about current facilities, existing facility needs, and expected future facility requirements for Federal Way Public Schools. A Financial Plan that shows expected funding for any new construction, portables and modernization listed follows this. l I I j FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2019 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN INVENTORY OF EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES I':LI^afII:N'I'AR1"SC 11K7OLti 1K-51 Adelaide t635 SW 3o4l" St Federal Way 98023 Brigadoon 3601 SW 336"' St Federal Way 98023 Camelot 4041 S 298"'St Auburn 98001 Enterpnse 35101 51' Ave SW Federal Way 98023 Green Gables 32607 47t'Ave SW Federal Way 98023 Lake Dolloff 4200 S 308"' St Auburn 98001 Lake Grove 303 SW 308"'St Federal Way 98023 Lakeland 35827 32"" Ave S Auburn 98001 Mark Twain 2450 S Star Lake Rd Federal Way 98003 Meredith Hill 5830 S 300"'St Aubum 98001 Minor Lake 625 S 314"' St Federal Way 98W3 Nautilus (K-8) 1000 S 289"' St Federal Way 98003 Olympic View 2626 SW 327"'St Federal Wav 98023 Panther Like 34424 1"Ave S Federal Way 98003 Rainier View 3015 S 368"' St Federal Way 98003 Sherwood forest 34600 12'"Ave SW Federal Way 98023 Silver Lake 1310 SW 325"'PI Federal Way 98023 Star Lake 4014 S 270"'St Kent 98032 Sunnycrest 24629 42"Ave S Kent 98032 'twin bakes 4400 SW 320"'St Federal Way 98023 Valhalla 27847 42""Ave S Auburn 98001 Wildwood 2405 S 30ol"St Federal Way 98003 Woodmont(K-8) 26454 16'"'Ave S Des Moines 98198 NIUDDLE;S(`1I0OL (6.81 Federal Way Public Academy(6-10) 34620 9"' Ave S Federal Way 98003 Illahee 36001 1"Ave S Federal Way 98003 Kilo 4400 S 308'"'St Auburn 98001 Lakota 1415 SW 314`St Federal Way 98023 Sacajawea 1101 S Dash Point Rd Federal Way 98003 Sequoyah 3450 S 360"' SF Aubum 98001 Totem 26630 40"'Ave S Kent 980 32 TAF(cry, Saghalie(6-12) 33914 19"'Ave SW Federal Way 98023 IUCII SC11001,+i 9-12 Decatur 2800 SW 320"'St Federal Way 98023 Federal Way 30611 16""Ave S Federal Way 98003 Thomas Jefferson 4248 S 288"'St Auburn 98001 Todd Beamer 35999 16'"'AveS Federal Way 98003 Career Academy at Truman 31455 28"'Ave S Federal Way 98003 ADDITIONAL SCHOOLS lntemel Academy(K-12) 31455 28"'Ave S Federal Way 98003 Employment Transition Prod an(12+) 33250 2111 Ave SW Federal Way 98023 federal Way Open Doors 31455 28"'Ave S Federal Way 98003 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2019 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CURRENT INY'ENTORY NON-INSTRLC'TIONAL FACILITIES i Developed Property i Central Kitchen 1214 S 332"" Federal Way 98003 Federal Way Memorial Field 1300 S 308"' St Federal Way 98003 Educational Services Center 33330 8'h Ave S Federal Way 98003 Support Services Center 1211 S 332"" St Federal Way 98003 Leased Primerty Early Learning Center at Uptown 1066 S 320"' St Federal Way 98003 Square Undevchwed Property Site Location 75 SW 360th Street & 31d Avenue SW—9.2 Acres 65 S 351 st Street& 52nd Avenue S—8.8 Acres 60 E of I Oth Avenue SW - SW 334th & SW 335'h Streets - 10.04 Acres 73 N of SW 320'" and east of 45"' PL SW—23.45 Acres 71 S 344th Street& 46th Avenue S - 17.47 Acres 82 1" Way S and S 342"d St—Minimal acreage 96 S 308'r St and 14`' Ave S—.36 Acres N otes: Not all undeveloped properties are large enough to meet school construction requirements. Properties may be traded or sold depending on what locations are needed to house students in the District. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2019 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN NEEDS FORECAST-EXISTING FACILITIES PHASE F EXISTING FACILITY FUTURE NEEDS ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF FUNDS On- Purchase and Relocate Interim Capacity Anticipated source of'funds is going ,Portables impact Fees. II Thomas Jefferson High Replace Existing Buildine, Voter Approved Capital bond School Increase Capacity II Illahce Middle School Replace Existing Buildin eta Approved d Capital bond II Totem Middle School Replace Existing Building Voter Approved Capital bond 11 Lake Grove Elementary Replace Existing Building, Voter Approved Capital bond Increase Capacity it Mark Twain Elementary Replace Existing Building, TBD, pendim; SOAP funding Increase Capacity II Mirror Lake Elementary Replace F,xisting Building, Voter Approved Capital bond increase Capacity II Olyinpic View K-8 School Replace Existing Building, Voter Approved Capital bond .. Increase Capacity ._...-. ....m .....m.. _ ---- It Star Lake Elementary Replace Existing Building, Voter Approved Capital bond Increase Capacity ......,. _...m.m...............m_... .,._............ II W ildwood Elementary Replace Existing Building, Voter Approved Capital bond Increase Capacity �.._ ........ . ... . .._. __............._... l Memorial Stadium Re lace Exismi Faciht� Voter Approved Capital bond III Decatur High School Replace Existing Building, TBD Increase Capacity III Kilo Middle School Replace Existing Building TBD __.._- -----------._.� _......._._........ .... ._ B,____ .___------ - --- III Sacalawea Middle School Replace Exishne Buildine TBD .. III Adelaide Elementary Replace Existing Building TBD Increase Capacity IB Brigadoon Elementary Replace Existing Building, TBD -- Increase Capacity .,_..... ,. .....—�_ .. ............. ........ fit Camelot Elementary Replace Existing Building, tBD Increase Capacity III Lake DollofP Elementary Replace Existing Building, 1Bll _­.. Increase Capacity III Nautilus K-8 School Replace Existing Building, TBD Increase Capacity III Twin Lakes Elementary Replace Existing Building, TBD _ Increase Capacity ......[[[ ,..._._-..._... ..._....... Woodniont K-8 School Replace Existing Building TBD Increase Capacity_ As part of the multi-phase plan, the District intends to increase capacity for elementary and high school students with expansion at the Thomas Jefferson, fake Grove, Minor Lake, Olympic View, Star Lake, and W i Idwood sites. Increased capacity at the five elementary schools listed and additional elementary schools in later phases, supplant the need for construction of a twenty-fourth elementary school. Only projects in Phase II with plaits to increase capacity are included in the impact fee calculation for this plan. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2019 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN NEEDS FORECAST-ADDITIONAL FACILITIES .. .._ r w F M it i i Y....._.. ta¢0 N....1...AN i is IMTED SOUzt_E rat t i_a,r,u�s.. l No current plans for additional facilities. 43 i a r � a a w a .-a z o w �^ j a „$ AI 0. n EN o ry5ryk'kI i i FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2019 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN i SECTION 2 - MAPS Federal Way Public Schools has twenty-one elementary schools (grades K-5), two schools with a K-8 grade configuration, six middle school schools (grades 6-8), four high schools (grades 9-12) and two small secondary schools. The Federal Way Public Academy serves students in grades 6-10. The programs at Career Academy at Truman High School serves students in grades 9-12. In addition to these programs, TAF(c)Saghalic serves students in grades 6-12 who reside within the service area. The following maps show the service area boundaries for each school, by school type. (Career Academy at Truman High School, Open Doors and Federal Way Public Academy serve students from throughout the District). The identified boundaries are reviewed annually. Any change in grade configuration or adoption of programs that affect school populations may necessitate a change in school service areas. The Growth Management Act requires that a jurisdiction evaluate if the public facility infrastructure is in place to handle new housing developments. In the case of most public facilities, new development has its major impact on the facilities immediately adjacent to that development. School Districts are different. if the District does not have permanent facilities available, interim measures must be taken until new facilities can be built or until boundaries can be adjusted to match the population changes to the.surrounding facilities. Adjusting boundaries requires careful consideration by the District and is not taken lightly. It is recognized that there is a potential impact on students who are required to change schools. Boundary adjustments impact the whole district, not just one school. It is important to realize that a single housing development does not require the construction of a complete school facility. School districts are required to project growth throughout the district and build or adjust boundaries based on growth throughout the district, not just around a single development. The final map included represents the city and county boundaries which overlap with the district's service areas. • City of Algona • City of Auburn • City of Des Moines • City of Federal Way • City of Kent • City of Milton • Unincorporated King County FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 20I9 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN MAP- ELEM ENTARY BOUNDARIES FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS ELLM EN74 RY¢]I OOI S M MIDDLF SCHOOLS L AD I LAIDC C LENICNTARY 3,, FW FUHUC AC A DEMY 2 OR IG'ADOON ILE NIL WAS f 30 ILIAHEE M I DDLE SCHOOL l CAMELOT ELEMEN ARY 31 KILO NdODLE SCHOOL a ^-• 4 ENTER f RI9ELLfLLLML`R GREEN GANL Y 3-1 L4KOTA MIDDLF SCHOOL jE S L'I LLLMLNIANY G IAKE DOLLDFF LTEMENTAR}' I4 SACNAWfA MIDRIF SI H(%)l LAKC GNOVL LLCMEN IAHY 37 SEOUOYAH MIDDLE SCHOOL A I CKCLAND ILEMENTMY 35 TOTEM MI DDLE SCHOO L 3 4 NI ARK TWAIN EI I MI.N I ARY 3H TAE 6 SAL�HAI.If 1C MEREDITH IIILI CIFMENTARY w/.�"�• III 11 A1INRORIAKFFIFMCNT4RY HIGH tiC1111015 l ." 12 NAUT ILL'KiALIIOAL i , ./ 11 'JLYMPI VIFW El FMENTARV Wl OEEATUfl HIGH 14 PANTHER LAKE ELEMENTAR, 41 FFDEFAL WAY II GH V yy� OIL TIIOMASIIFFIR50NI1 IGIIM IS MINI@ VEINFC LCST[LIM Y u 45 TODD REAMER HIGH 17 SILVIO LADWRI-NTAR,CNTAAV 49O CARrfH Al ADCMY�TRUM AN L] SILVER LAKE EIFMLNTARI' i,. TR STAR IA{F El EMCNTARY St (TP{NONNIAN CEMER W 10 SLNNYCN Li CLCM CNTAN't M VMN LAKES FLFMFNLLRY ADMINISTRATIVE SITES 21 VM1LIIAIIA CLCM'NTARY 22 WILDWOOD ILIMINLAf 21 WOODMONT K BSCIIOOI ply fr. 1 kf' G S X t �„ FW GS PROPERT' P I y p l I�4 a, IA 11 j t tt Ay 1 fY IY tl.^ d L qq I I I f I M k ELEMENTARY BOUNDARIES l IN f f m I i n.9 09 12 ®�MAPS � l FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2019 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN MAP-MIDDLE SCHOOL BOUNDARIES � FEDERAL WAY + PUBLIC SCHOOLS ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS aMIl7DLF SCHOIXS I ALCLAIIL ELEMENTARY ib EW PURDCACADEMY .M+4.w•"..... y BRIGADGON ELLMENTARY 30 ILIAHEE MIDDLESCHOOL I CAMELOT ELEMENTARY 'Ak If 31 KILO MIDDLE SCHOOL H ENTERPRISE ELCMFNTARV yy S GREFN GABLES ELEMENTARY 32 LAKOTA MIDDLE SCHOOL i4 •� 6 LAKE DO I LOSE ELEMENTARY 43 SACAIAWEA MIDDLE SCHOOL H,19m i SEOVOYAH MIDDLE E SCHOOL 'f LANE GROVE ELEMENTARY 1 N IAKELAND 0 EMFNTARY 35 TOTEM MIDDLE SCHOOL it MARK TWAIN ELEMENTARY 38 TAF@SAGHALIE X + :.9� 1 ID MERFOOH HILLEICMENTAR4 It MIRROR LAKE ELEMENTARY fl /' HIGH SCHOOLS 12 NAUTILUS K n SCHOOL 1d OLYMPIC VIEW ELEMENTAO 4u UD ATUB HIGH 41 ECDLRAL WAY III lI ^J P la PANTHER LAKE ELEMENTARY 421 TIIOMASICFFCfl50N IIG,I 1E RAINIER VIEW ELEMENTARY ° aS TOLD REAMER IIIGII 16 SHERWOOD FOREST ELEMENTARY ti'9C. 17 SLIVER LAKE ELEMENTARY 490 CAFCCH ACADEMY@TNUMAN i ly 51 EIP/NORMAN CENTER 1R STAR LAKE ELEMENTARY t s 1 X �JA ° XP L 19 SUNNYCRCSE ELEMENTARY "" P 26 TWIN LAKES ELEMENTARY ADMINISTRATIVE sITES .•�P 21 VALHALLA ELEMENTARY ,ti T ti 111 LI >2 WILDWOR10 ELEMENTARYvn� 11 WOODMONT KBSCHOOL i p '^� 0 ' L qq I..: tl 11rf• 1°y SWISS PROPERTY a. T� it a T L X u H I At I f 0 4 '1..... 1 V1'+ 1 Y IM 1"Y MIDDLE SCHOOL ti BOUNDARIES l� LD,1B.3 0.5 0.9 1,3 MITE. Cate: 7.1.17 17 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2019 CAPH AL FACILITIES PLAN N'IAY- HIGH SCHOOL BOUNDARIES FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS CLEM[WARY SOIIUOLS INMIDDIESCHUUL t 1 AD 0 AI DE ELEMENTARY RR fW PUBLIC ACA DEW 4 I RRIGADOON ELEMENTARY 90 LIAHEEMIDpEE SCHOOL 3 CAMELOT ELEMENTARY I� 31 KILO MIDDLE SCHOOL n ENTERPRISE ELEMENTARY 5 GREEN GABLES ELEMENTARY ffi IANOTA MIDDLE SCHOOL LC q 6 LAKE DOLLOFF ELEMENTARY 31 SACAIAWEA MIDDLE SCHCOL T LAKE GROVE ELEMENTARY 37 SEQUOYAH MIDDLE SCHOOL q �' R TAR[LANp ELEMENTARY 35 TOTEM MIDDLE SCHOOL d ' R MARK TWAIN ELEMENTARY 311 TAR 6 SAGIHALIE 1p M[NEpiEII HILLIELEMENTARY �' S .'' Lr J L - 11 MIRROR LAKE ELEMENTARY i y li NAUTILUS K R SCHOOL 'fg HIGH SCHOOLS Jp o[cATUR HIGH ., 13 R VIEW ELEMENTARY PANTHER ; 1J AINTHEfl LAKE ELEMENTARY Jl FEp(RAL W'AY IIIGII / I / 15 RAINIER VIEIV ELEMENTARY 421 THOMAS IEFEER50N H IGH 16 SHFH'NODU FOREYTLLLMEN TAPY 45 TODU B[AM[RHIGH D 5 I LVE R L AK E E L EMEN TAR Y LIES CAREER AUDEMV@TRDMAN I J L yK I y . Sl E TONG R MA N CE N ELR i 1" 19 4ARIAKE FI EMENTAH/ i. L, vy IIPIi ✓yy` 19 SUNNYLRCST ELEM ENTAR' 20 RVIN LAKES ELEMENTARY ADMINISTRATIVE SLTE II VALHALLA ELEMENTARY Lz WILDWQOD u[MENTARY 21 WOODMONI K—RSCHOOL >/� $ $Od FWPs PROPERTY 4N" I kl IT I y AS SO °� 1 � Y " e:. �E e1� ' Val la fva�, I ti. ,r• 'w'" f,, 0 �Ay. Y �relll y q� r SL tnara r M ..e�i k�J Orl HIGH SCHOOL BOUNDARIES . IN r r' T 193 0,6 D,9 1.2 :0 � ,, CAM'. 9.2.16 13 I FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2019 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN MAP—CITY AND COUNTY JURISDICTIONS FEDERAL "11'' PUBLIC SCHOOLS Each Scholar.A Vol".A!rear!.AS RIGHT luture, i e pp Algona AUNIM 4" , Des Moines Federal Way Mrv6rre Kent U Kent ....:1 Mittan King a� 'I a Auburn I �146 ri x � �t 1 I Count lahaona 4 l Milton City and County � � 2Mpe Jurisdictions 19 i FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2019 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN MAJON 3- SUPPORT I)OCUVdMI"AnON Building Capacities-The Education Program Portable Locations Student Forecast—2019 through 2025 1.'; FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS .019 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN I BUILDING CAPACITIES This Capital Facilities Plan establishes the District's "standard of service" in order to ascertain the District's current and future capacity. The Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, but these guidelines do not take-into consideration the education program needs. I In general, the District's current target class size provides that the average class size for a standard classroom for grades K through 3 should be t7 students to comply with current legislation, however compliance is currently suspended so we are using current average class sizes. In grades 4-5 the target is 25 students. For grades 6 to l2 the target class size is 26 students. Classrooms for students with Individualized Education Program (Special Education) needs are calculated at 12 seats per classroom. Historically, the District has used the OSPI square footage calculation as a baseline for capacity calculation and made adjustments for specific program needs. The District will continue to use this calculation for detenmining capacity at our middle and high schools, However, with the implementation of smaller K-3 class sizes which requires a significant reduction in K-3 class sizes, elementary capacity, in this Plan,will be calculated based on the number of classroom spaces, the number of students assigned to each classroom and the extent of support facilities available for students, staff, parents, and the commtmity. Class Size FWPS Historical HB26hl/SHB2 76 Square Footage Guidelines "Standard of Service" Enacted Law Guideline Kindergarten 18.9 17 25 28 Grades 1-2 — 18.9 17 25-28 ......... ... _ ........ Grade 3 18.9 17 28 Grades4-5 25 _.._...... _. .......... . 25 ....... � ........., ._28.................... For the purposes of determining student capacity at individual schools, the following list clarifies adjustments to classroom spaces and the OSPI calculation. Special Education Resource Rooms: Each middle school requires the use of a standard classroom(s) for special education students requiring instruction to address specific disabilities. English as a Second Language Programs: Each middle school and high school requires the use of a standard classroom for students learning English as a second language. Middle School Computer Labs: Each middle school has computer labs, except Totem Middle School. Wireless access has been installed at all secondary schools. If additional classroom space is needed, these computer labs may be converted to mobile carts. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2019 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN BUILDING CAPACITIES, continued High School Career Development and Learning Center (Resource) Room: Each high school provides special education resource room and career development classrooms for students requiring instruction to address specific disabilities. Preschool/ECEAP/Headstart: Our distinct currently offers preschool programs for both special needs &typically developing students at 10 elementary schools. We also have ECEAP and Headstart program at 10 sires (4 elementary, 1 middle, 3 high schools, and 2 off-site locations). These programs decrease capacity at those schools. The District has recently opened a leased space and relocated several programs to this location and to the recently vacated TAFA portables. This has also allowed us to expand the number of ECEAP programs o ffered. Alternative Learning Experience: Federal Way offers students the opportunity to participate in an Alternative Learning Experience through our Internet Academy. These students have never been included in the capacity calculation of unhoused students. ] `I FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2019 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN BUILDING CAPACITIES,continued 11FNnN'CARY RUILDING iMIDDLESCI1001.RCUDING PROGRAM CAPACf1'Y PROGRAM CIPACIPP S i.I o01 N"Ifw 11acoue[ •••••••• School Pdanr H'udumnl hfl'. Adrhude 39 Illhihee 855 864 �N.iio:¢loon 299 1 779 787 Crcrnukrt � 217 fskori 786 794 345 l.,.Inmca _ 694— 01 a in 401 olimal'1 585 591 1 400 I'a[c1n 795 NUJ JI. oyp 353 1 All ., ;"il9l, 598 604 371 I w 1 nal Vdap I'll A, 1"adem' ww w183 185 v`a1, 1, 430 101AI. 5275 5d29 [f Iihllill 375 h"„iiaoi l aVir 262 1 Atcraeo 727 735 Olvmnic V�ra 353 HICII SCI1001.It ILDING m ihi;r[n l 347 PROCIVINI CAPACPPY 405 sh Ili,ooAl offo;t 390 r'l ocl l'duloc IL1243 nt III 1 laku dOU I[ u- Ib47 1329 %d<c.._........__.�..,.. JJ7 ,i 4w ._._._....._____._._. ...... _....1684 1.801 ,mnlr crave[ JOS Ih IIIj I,.(1(1too 1324 I 1179 I it .h_,^� JJI Ic Ic V.'a imo r IIINS 1.160 V ,dnillu 472 I�Mi Su¢I,... 155 166 170 l'ld raaA 172 f A [d� 1 I q 159 1711 nn \t hl ulo['h`.31[ 7S7 ,f 11 Jidv hl t1un11 116 12, 'I'D'I'AE 8.445 t nlalnnnuol l l if, inn Plm..rarn 48 51 10 I\I. 5.714 6.111 Elementary Awraee 367 "'HIRh School Am aae 1.„I09 1,400 Noes. I rnl R cy l ul.l..Arad [ Gi wei fffldt IfIf [(I I iiiiiuri I II,h School. i id I vmeI It )If[I"III,) Prodlnm tfII(II21' i ` p dir 1"iIli hill ;chuol 11 I uidr ilau('I ['J'.irc no uill A;v f�lifiol, I II sc so lix I6'amn o(ovi1n 11 c .a f:r IaLLsl�,i�er.+.eus. i �5 I FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2019 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN i PORTABLE LOCATIONS The Washington State Constitution requires the State to provide each student a basic education. It is not an efficient use of District resources to build a school with a capacity for 500 students due to lack of space for 25 students when enrollment fluctuates throughout the year and from year to year. Portables are used as interim measures to house students when increasing population impacts a school attendance area. Portables may also be required to house students when new or changing programs require additional capacity. They also provide housing for students until permanent facilities can be financed and constructed. When permanent facilities become available, the portable(s)is either used for other purposes such as storage or child care programs, or moved to another school for an interim classroom. Some portables may not be fit to move due to agc or physical condition. In these cases, the District may choose to buy new portables and surplus these unfit portables. The following page provides a list of the location of the portable facilities, used for educational facilities by Federal Way Public Schools. I FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2019 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PORTABLE LOCATIONS, Continued PORTABLES LOCATED PORTABLES LOCATED AT ELENII:NTARY SCHOOLS Al HIGH SCHOOLS Now note ralltnor nn INFi]AI1:11 nAI ti.io A LIIx;aIDu f ,._mne Atl,kilda L 2 DQ1': JJ N 1 Bria,ndoan I ti r3u il� � . .._......�__ .kr cn� C'a nurini I ThointnX.I e.VFeisnn 10 Fntemrisc 3 1 utd l3�utrcr R Cimcn Gahlar; I 'EIPIN,II. 2fi take Dolloil 2 __ _.............__......................_.. ............................._. C:dre Grore. 2 Ink,I.nd ............__.. Maik [wain 3 Mcrpdith Ihll 3 PORTABLES LOCATED Mom [i1w to 2 AT SUPPORT FACILITIES N2mitt3 5 Olv innic View _ 2 MO'i Panther lal-z 4 Rainier Vicw 5 1=o nner T,4FA I L 3homrood IFn res[ 4 ITOTAL 1 20 5ilvcr Inky 4 SlnrUU. 3 l 5unn�cr 6 DISTRICT PORTABLES IN USEEOR F(:EAP T�no Cskrs 3 AND/OR HEADSTART V Jhullu �__....._.... .... .Ahw"m'd F(l1'( 7711 it 4 l [cni 2 Vv onchuonl 3 TerXnl 4 PORTABLES LOCA IUD AL MIDDLESCHOOLS iaoir i Ols rrx Ill.I10 AVLL 11 rN1 11 c11 1, 1,1 Ela hee 2 I Kilo 1 6 Aul, Sacu inwea � 5 m S, h 2 I A I r¢'Snir h a 11, 4 TOTAL Ift 7 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2019 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN STUDENT FORECAST Student enrollment projections area basic component of budget development. Enrollment projections influence many of the financial estimates that go into budget preparation. The majority of staffing requirements are derived directly from the forecasted number of students. Allocations for instructional supplies and materials are also made on the basis of projected enrollment. Other expenditures and certain revenue projections are directly related to enrollment projections. Enrollment projections are completed annually in the Business Services Department. Projections must be detailed at various levels, district total, school-building totals, grade level and program level to include vocational and special education students. The basis of projections has been cohort survival analysis. Cohort survival is the analysis of a group that has a common statistical value(grade level)as it progresses through time. In a stable population the cohort would be 1.00 for all grades. This analysis uses historical information to develop averages and project the averages forward. This method does not trace individual students; it is concerned with aggregate numbers in each grade level. The district has used this method with varying years of history and weighted factors to study several projections. Because transfers in and out of the school system are common, student migration is factored into the analysis as it increases or decreases survival rates. Entry grades (kindergarten) are a unique problem in cohort analysis. The district collects information on birth rates within the district's census tracts, and treats these statistics as a cohort tar kindergarten enrollment in the appropriate years. The Federal Way School District is using various statistical methods for projecting student enrollments. The resultant forecasted enrollments are evaluated below. The first method is a statistical cohort analysis that produces ten distinct forecasts. These are forecast of enrollment for one year. The projections vary depending on the number of years of historical information and how they are weighted. A second method is a projection using an enrollment projection software package that allows the user to project independently at school or grade level and to aggregate these projections for the district level. The Enrollment Master" software provides statistical methods including trend tine, standard grade progression(cohort) and combinations of these methods. This software produces a five-year projection of school enrollment. In February 201 S, the District contracted a demographer to develop projections for the Federal Wav School District. 'rhe report was complete in March 2018. The model used to forecast next vear's enrollment uses cohort survival rates to measure grade to grade growth, assumes market share losses to private schools (consistent with county-wide average), assumes growth from new housing or losses due to net losses horn migration. This forecast was provided as a range of three projections. The long-range forecast provided with this report used a model with cohort survival rates and growth rates based on projected changes in the 5-19 age group for King County. Most of the methods used for long range enrollment reporting assume that enrollment is a constant percent of FEDERAL WAY PURT47 SCHGOT S 7019 CAPITAT, FACTLITTFS PLAN STUDENT FORECAST, continued something else(e.g. population) or that enrollment will mirror some projected trend for the school-age population over time. The report included 5 different calculations to provide a range of possible projections for the District to the year 2025. This model produces a projection that is between 21,500 and 25,000 when applied to the low, medium and high range modes. This provides a reasonable range for long-range planning and is consistent with estimates from various models. Long-range projections that establish the need for facilities are a modification of the cohort survival method. The cohort method of analysis becomes less reliable the farther out the projections are made. The Federal Way School District long-range projections are studied annually. The study includes information from the jurisdictional demographers as they project future housing and population in the region. The long-range projections used by Federal Way Public Schools reflect a similar age trend in student populations as the projections published by the Office of Financial Management for the State of Washington. [Year term projections assume some growth from new housing, which is offset by current local economic conditions. The District tracks new development from five permitting jurisdictions. Long range planning assumes a student yield from proposed new housing consistent with historical growth patterns. Growth Management requires jurisdictions to plan for a minimum of twenty years. The Federal Way School District is a partner in this planning with the various jurisdictions comprising the school district geography. These projections create a vision of the school district community in the future. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2019 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN STUDENT FORECAST, continued Headcount Enrollment History and Projections (Excludes Full-Time Running Stall) Tann K-12 04ian. enlendxr l"r ,' ,hkwf Y'9mr VIV11VPnnnry Yl ddlcsn,01 Iltl fl .W10trl 11( fLrxvOr• '_011 2012-13 0,711 9014 G,NI. 215L2 '_014 100-L4 10,14, 4_N41 6.B?I 11 MM J,14, 1015 ?I11k-15 999s 4,931 6.835 21.714 ,04z% ?01G NW-16 [010o 5.W14 6(Qi 1199i 1,1% 2017 2016-17 104'4 S,(111 6.476 21,931 -0„M 1018 IQ17-19 1041N 5,159 6-138 I[Q15 -0.116 1019 82018-19 111,292 5,247 6,378 21,917 OA"11 11)JO P2019-20 10,201 5,470 6,424 22,185 1.2 21121 0020-21 10.288 5,461 6149.i 22,243 0.30E 'O, P2021-22 10,336 5_357 6,654 22.347 U.Sio 3023 P2022-23 10,444 5.2,59 6,786 22,489 0,6Y 10-4 P2023-N 10,593 5,253 6,861, 22,113 1.0-6 20'5 P20244.5 111,79E 5.285 6,886 2L967 1.1 Elern...ma k-5 Hidd(r.S,h,,W 69 HgA SMh W 942 24,000 Enrollment Hi story and Six Year Forecast 23,000 22,000- 21,000 2Cp00- 19,000 18,000 17,000 0,000 No No N� No N' No �N qN A, 2 -O0 q� o °o School Year oiw 23 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2019 CAPITAL FACIT.TTTES PLAN SECTION 4—KING COUNTY C IT1' 01F FEDERAL WAY AND CITY OF KENT IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS Capacity Summaries Site &Construction Costs Allocations Student Generation Rates Impact Fee Calculations Reference to Impact Fee Calculations 11 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2019 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARIES All Grades, Elementary, Middle School, and High Schools The Capacity Summaries combine Building Capacity information, Portable Capacity information and the Student Forecast information. The result demonstrates the requirements for new or remodeled facilities and why there is a need for the District to use temporary facilities or interim measures. The District has recently adjusted its capacity calculation method for Elementary schools to better show capacity needed to comply with the K-3 Class Size Reduction. This adjustment is also shown in the portable capacity calculation. In order to allow for flexibility in portable usage the District will use an average class size calculation of 21 for each Elementary portable and an average class size of 25 for each Middle and High School portable. The information is organized in spreadsheet format, with a page summarizing the entire District, and then evaluating capacity vs. number of students at elementary,middle school, and high school levels individually. The notes at the bottom of each spreadsheet provide information about what facilities are in place each year. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOT:S ?nlg CAPTTAI FACITITIF.S PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARIES, Continued Capacity Summary—All Grades Bud¢m -- Proiccted-- CalendarVear 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 C,APA(j Vi, School Your 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 BUILDING PROGRAM HEADCOUNTCAPACITY 19,434 19,434 19,434 19,434 20,005 20,455 20,455 FTECAPACITY 19.$85 19;RR5 19.R85 19.885 20,456 '. 20922 20.922 AddGtpacay Adwstcd Ptogrum Headcount Capacnv 19,434 19.434 19,434 20.005 20.455 20.455 20.455 Adjusted Pro ram FTECapacjt 19.885 1 19.885 1`19.985 '20456 20,n ' '20.922 20922 ENROLLMENT L3asic Flexdcnnnt&rrollmenl 21,91� '�,18s i12241 22,J4' T,439 22,713 e2,967 Intemet Academy Headcount Fnmllmeml (,20k2} (208) (208) E208} (208} (2Oi3) (208y BasicF"PE Pnrolhnent.withuut lntomeLAcademy 71:709 11917. '??Wl 22.1;9 21N1,. ,22,505 22,-S9 SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) PROCRANIFFECAPACITY 77T1824 0'4.'2 Y 0 1' 43 " 1478 '.1 S83 1(1,037) RELOCATABLECAPACITY (]urent Portable Capacity 2,171 2,297 2,297 1.919 1,919 1,019 1,919 Add New Portable Capacity I'Eh Subtract Portable Capacity Adius Led Portable Ca acity 2,2LJ7 2297 .1,919 19I9 1.919 1,919 f,919 SURPLUS OR(UN HOUS®) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 473 205 `(2311 236 544 336 [,,82_ NOTES: I Intemet Academy students arc.included in proiecGons but do act m4une Iu11 time use of scltoel tacilcies. 26 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2019 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARIES,Continued Capacity Summary—Elementary Schools Bud et - Pro-ccted-- Calend;mYear 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2027 2024 CAPACITY School Ycar 12018-19 2019-20 202021 2021-22 2022-23 11023-24 2024-25 BUILDING PR(KRAN1 HEADCOUNT CA1'AC'I1Y 8,445 8,441 8445 9,445 9,016 9,229 9,229 FTE CAPACCIY 8.445 8-445 8,445 3445 9,016. 92,29 9.229 Add/Subuact Capacity WWI Add capacity all lake Gmve 'Zq7 Minor lake 196 Stiff Uko d13 W ildwcod b28 Adlustod Pro mm Fleadceunt Canacity 8.445 8.445 8441 9.016 9,229 9,229 9,229 Adjusted Pm tam FEE 'a acit 8.445 8.445 8,445 1 9,014 1 9.229 9229 1 9,229 FNROLLMENT Basic 1-1011CICOn1 I Enrollnxnn 10.292 IQ291 10.288 tO,D(� 10,444 1O73 10.7O( Intemet Acadeury Headcount'- (L5) (15) (IS} (I5) (l7J (IS { Basic Headcount Enmllimw witbout Imemek Ar9detmr: 10,277 111.276 10.27} IU.721 117.429 10,57)8 10.IS)15) SURPLUS OR(UNHOUS M) PROGRAM CAPACITY 1832 1$3] 1.828 I Q5 1 00 t 349 1 552 RELOCAPABLECAPACITV Cun'ent PoiYable Capacity 1,071 1,197 L10 919 819 819 819 Add/Subnact poilablecapacily Add poilable ,apacily at Iakc Oolloff 42 WIC,dith Hill = 42 Sunnycrest 'lag .Subtrect punablc capacity at lake G'Ove (a121 Minor Like 210p .Slat Like 1(6 M1 W ddwood Adjusted Portable Capacity M97 '1 1197 819 1 $19 819 819 SX') SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSFD) PROGRAM AND REI.00ATABLE CAPACFI'Y 635 (634) (I009 486 381 530 (73J NOTES: I Capacity inetauses um projected based on a design to accoimrodate 600s LLeicnts—as design is cmrpleted thGe may he adjusted in Tahoe itetahOns Cf(hiS pinn, Increased capacity is cwaently stated as the dilferenee belweet ctment calculated capacity and the projected design, 2 Intemet Acadeony students am included in prujections but do 110t requite Itdl tune use Of school faellities. 3 Roloeutoble Capacity is based On the number-ofpoaables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to tengsoinoly house students until penrtmenl hsildies are available.this is u oalculatod numbetonly, The actual nundmr oFpmtables That will be used will be based nn actual student population needs'. The District nuty begin tO pull portables firm the lnsnuctional inveli(my Age and condition of the pottubles will detenrdne feasibility for coWinned insuvCional use. 27 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2Q19 ( APITAI, FACILITIES PI AN CAPACITY SUMMARIES,Continued Capacity Summary— Middle Schools Bud Let - P"a'ectad-- Calend"rYear 2018 20t9 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 1 Y St'IRS Year 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2,02#-24 2024-25 BUILDING PROGRAM HEADCOUNT CAPACITY 5,275 51275 5,275 5,275 5,275 5,275 5,275 ETECAPACITY 5329 5.329 5329 5,329— 5.329 5329 5329 Add Subtract capacity Add capacity ar Tolens� Il i d' ed Pro ram Headcount Ca icit 5,275 5,275 .5,275 5,275 5,27g 5,275 5.2/5 Admated Pmaialm F1'F canacie, 5.329 5329 5.329 5.129 5329 i5329 5,329 ENROLLMENT Basic Headcount Untolhtnnt 5Z47 5.470 5.452 5.357 5.259 5,253 5,285 hitemet Acadentya (47) 1;°4"7) f'd'77 (4"7} (47) (47) (47) Basic,Enrolhneut without lniemet Acudetm V00 5A23 5A1s 53]p,. 5.212 ': ,5 m i5.238 SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) PROGRAMCAPACITY 129 94 8b 19 117 123 91 REIACATABLECAPACIPY' Cwrent Portable Capacity 450 4511 450 450 450 350 350 Add Subtract portable Capacity 10tem Middle School (100) Adjusted PtRI Ca achy .I 450 450 450 . 450. 450 350 350 SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RFLOCATABLE CAPACITY 7579 3.56. 1 304 469. 1467 473 1 441. NOTES: 1 Totem Middle SCImo1 cuRCtI ly has a capacity far800"mde"Is ;md is being designed to acco unto III a lei ell mpamblc Student population. 2 Internet Acad any students are included in pinjeclions hilt do not rCYlo im hull lime useol school faclhtleS. 3 Relaeatable Capacity is based on the number)[portables avaihible and other adminisnaml:techniques which can be used to LempolanlP house students until permanent I)Icilitics are.avuilvd,C I his is a calculated number only. These wa I mmmhcrof p)iRLI that will be used will be hased on its tudent population Timis. The Disbicumry begin to pull portables fmm the instmctional inventory. Age and condition otthe ponnhlcs will dCICnT11nC fcoa ib ilitY for Con Gnu ell in I(RIC[1O"a1 use, 28 i FEDERAL SCHOOLS 7 )L WAY PUBLIC _C 1 J CAPITA ('L FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARIES, Continued Cupaoihr Summary— High SGI70OIS Ciudt;et — Prdcctcd - t'ulcndnYcar 21114 2019 2010 21721 2022 2013 1 2024 CAPACITN SehooIYea, 20I8-19 2019-20 202021 2D21 c 2022-21 1021 24 2024L5 BUIIDNC pRoci 2A_NI I IEADC'OUN'I CAPACITY 5,714 5,714 5.714 5,714 5,714 5951 5,951 FTF CAPACITY (),III 6.111 6.111 6.111 6AIl 6104 6.364 Add,`SuhP,,,tcapucity Tlunmi Jellenon ligh School' Adiuslcd Program Hcadcnunl Capaciy 5,714 5,714 1 5.714 1 5.714 5,951 5951 11 5,951 Adiusted Pro ram FTECaoncity 6.111 1 5,11I 6JI1 1 6.111 b,W 6,3(A [ 6364 FNROLLNIEN F Bale Ileadcounl Eumm llmcnl 6XA 1 g424 6,49J 6,(,54 6,786 (l�67 60h In lcmct Ac micmyl (b46) C46) (146) (14(,) (146) Basic Ed Mtk Lll lntemet Acadenry 6232 G.27$ 6.347 6.508 .6„640 6.721 6,740 MUMS OR(UNIIOUSIED) PROGRANICAPAMY p21 ]67 236 397 276 357 376 RELOCATABLLC\PA(bb�" C'urmnl Poitablu Capacity 65D 650 h50 650 6S0 6S0 650 AddlSuhlricl ponablcanpacily Adiusted Portable Capacity 650 650 650 650 650 6SO 650 SURPLLS OR(UNHOU'SM) PROGRANIAND RELOCAFABLE CAPACITY' 529 1 4113 1 414 253 374 1 293 1 274 VO'I LS: I. Inlemel Academy lludenI, are included In projections htddo not requim lull lime use o t s drool lhel1ltlCs. 2 R.loca nib 1,C'upacaS is hosed on the n umber oI portable,n,adPl,ln and olII edmin MI aline lechnRile'Ahlch call be used n0 tcinporarily house s w dcu is un lit peIIIIiI vflCJI(e9 are a-ailahlu,"Thin It it celcalated as ether on ly. Ibei w alms n be r u l portab les dia l will he usedwi11 he based on ectua l s to dens populaliun needs. The DlrcPICI m.ry begin to pull portables Pill llie Ins❑netioiwl inyentoil, Agc and condition of the pmTables will rlclennine lcae ibihty loraontitmed 'in,[ c(tional use, 7. (' pooity Ibr u It housed s tode:us will be atCnwXI(JACd with narvcling t1l,di and no planning Hine iu same clan s ronnu. 4 Cunent projcel limclincs estiMale Ilia completionoITliontasJet7cisun HSopoaing in the 1e1110 I'T'. 7Q FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2019 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN IMPACT FEE, CALCULATIONS Single and Multi-Family Residences Each jurisdiction that imposes school impact fees requires that developers pay these fees to help cover a share of the impact of new housing developments on school facilities. To determine an equitable fee throughout unincorporated King County, a formula was established. This formula can be found in King County Code 21A and was substantially adopted by the City of Auburn, Federal Way and Kent. The formula requires the District to establish a "Student Generation Factor" which estimates how many students will be added to a school district by each new single or multi-family unit and to gather some standard construction costs, which are unique to that district. Impact Fee Calculation On page 30, the 2018 variables for the calculation of the Impact Foe for single family and multi-family units based on King County Code 21A and the Growth Management Act, generate the results below: Plan Year 2018 Plan Year 2019 _.....m .............._....,.,.,.,.... ,. Single Family Units 86 b42 $7,221 Multi-Family Units S20.086 $19,454 Mixed-Use Residential' $10,043 $9,727 Impact Fee Calculation- King County Code 21 A The Impact Fees have changed as a result of changes in several factors. The updates made to the variables in the Impact Fee calculation, generate a change in the Impact Fee between the 2018 Capital Facilities Plan and the 2019 Capital Facilities Plan. A summary of these changes can be found on page 32 and a year over year comparison of formula variables can be found on page 33. Iri accordance with the City of Federal Way Ordinance No. 95-249, i FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2019 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS, continued Impact Fee Calculation; Schral Site AcgniSitlon Cnsl: !iturdent u¢u<lcnt Faaihly PeaiIII, I aqm I I i' ' t,1i !r e A,ua s Y ItacN4 NI I{ NIIK V cIIK Gletnentn 01 Fl tY SSt,S ,p SO M iddl,It 6c U U!T o 4J1 d) SO llgllsdiwl b71t> IS' OISH) fl 9W UAQ St79t ................ _. __ _ ,.�.m......._....,.. 'TOTAL $2,"2 ._.�.,,$5i81 Schrwl Co.owinNon Cn51: Student .Student '%Penn Pact Facility Fnc ility factor Nsatnt ., ilat sAlt O"t Clrurati SH2 M1IIR I A4f lh t lcux.ntei� )dlStP47Ylt ItiO .,.....,._.,U 10 l)lpiEX. IIIM tit 2°ISk Meldl, S h of 15 11E ' $0 _ wn Ih h SahonL !A Y 9C C611 !L _ /3-i 0 Ao Yi _ __ u Y A Yb 11 I)im S ...,. ... SPSSItl O�h rN >}_ 'ICl int. 411N N47.M Trmpet'ary Fuci 11(N CnsC Student Student I ,,q,Fac, IIl"1I[V I acility LaCtDC I actor �Io) I"t R t'ost tir aNcilh _ al'I{ iYl l�R "SfR t111�t, M iddlcS Irr 7 FS1 a $14V Ii8 ry 01rd4 Id S'61i9 S y°S F l�n�m tary Cr 'M -7 Hich Seh rcl `I lu 0 1 rO - —�_ „w, .., M._......r V 7+tlltt CO J 1'0IAL $21 Stele M1latchne Crete[Cocidalion: Student StL1de111 Cons uuoGon C'os1 Sy.IY, SGtta I ami, I'"III AII,,at ieuo:Ssy ht .. SRnalenl 7.imlcYl .sIto �btII, y81a, lvll'H fl n>tnt:nt t )+ r&I C li (1n4t' Ih5N0,5 r 41J4% MfddlcScht $ 5f 11 II IUli U t01 +u�HighSdu ;,r 37t Ilil 1 '4 tl llra7 tl'NtJb' r>(bU t Total FSti3 $13 1 ax Payment(.rnr11(Cal c of 11HIM 51'R M I K A vciaPc l-'css cd Value M;u:h';0181 N127:YtVJ 'Y1114 I Cupiml @mJ In tcrcal R;rto(bl.uch 201B) V'ct Present bnluc Ill Ar .r �u Dwcllin'd S1 t r7.. J 5 kf+4 111 IP R'prLLy tail evy [tote ....._ ___,_ ._.._...._... Prey ref Value of Revenue Sh"am tS3.2-14 SL171 Siugle I'anilly Multi-Family MIxn4Un'e {crirknrn t{4.5'91{l'llrcr Yr§ ¢entivylI ]9i ti gal i ou Fee Su oil maty Sit,Acquwsition( ,,t Y.N62 S i / l S 5,MI Pcrnerr cot FoaiGq Oust 20,404 $ 47}gg r.}7,38S brrlpetlui 1 sifity Cost 21 3 S(ulc Menah Ctedit .r f5.6331 S (Ii,R,) .F (17,1,15) I I "Wilt C'I,d it S g+211X $ 11111) A II 17tJ B utrTatal $ 14,443 $ 38A08 $ 38,94 50",Local Shore S 7?21 S 19,454 ll J 4i4 C Irw hiled If. mcl tree ;°a 7 221 5 1 gil It 9,7,27 City of Kent Impact Fee' $r. 7,221 �$ S,3116 In nccordanc c ,ilh the City , trcdcsxll eY Oralinancc No.95-249 7n:u cw d,m e with the Cih all U2linan cc Ne.4278 i FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2019 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN i REFERENCES TO IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS SCHOOL ACQUISITION COST The district purchased the Norman Center to house the Employment Transition Program and to allow for the expansion of the ECEAP program. The purchase and use of this site increased our high school permanent capacity by 51 students. T-..otal........_.Co--_st.. _ ....... ............. .................... _..... .......... ...... .... 100 m.. ..0.... 2 00 _........._050 -0 .... $2,1 , / 51, ,11011 Cost per Acre 51,050,000/4.85=$216,718 SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION COST _� .....................................,..,__,_. _,,...,,,.......,,,,,........___...,,_._..,,.._,,.._ ----.., With voter approval of the$450,000,000 bond package, design work is underway for six of the approved projects. Anticipated construction budgets (based on the Maximum Allowable Construction Cost or MACC) have been updated to reflect the current construction market, and capacity has been tine-tuned. In addition, a credit for the cost of new construction is incorporated to recognize the K-3 Class Size Reduction Grant obtained by Federal Way Public Schools. It is estimated this $23 miltion grant will be reimbursed in six equal payments a portion for each of the six schools serving K-3 students. The following table outlines the facility cost included in the impact fee calculation: ........................ .. _ .._. ._ .....,__,..._.., _ ................... .m .. Elementary Elementary Schools Lake Grove Mirror Lake Star Lake Wildwood TOTAL —.. ....--.-._ ...... ....... -......-- Pcrnranent 353 404 387 472 1616 Capacity _ .., ., New Capacity 600 600 600 600 2400 Increased Capacity as % 48.5% MACC $27,174,250 527,174,250 $29,854,450 $27,174,250 S111,377,200 _ _...._.— ....-............ Proportionate $ 54,034,483 Share K 3 CI nss 4rzc Credit (S 15313,333) S 38,701,150 Net Proportionate Share Two additional projects are within this horizon, but not yet included—Olympic View K-S and Mark Twain Elementary. These costs will be incorporated into future Capital Facilities Plans. Current Middle School capacity calculations do not reflect unhoused students, so no costs associated with [Malice Middle School or Totem Middle School are included. Consistent with the capacity calculations described earlier, the District uses the OSP1 square footage calculation for determining capacity at our secondary schools. Based on this methodology, the following construction costs for Thomas Jefferson High School are allocated as the proportionate share: I FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2019 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN REFERENCES TO IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS,continued Square Footal-e Capacity at 130 Su. f _9 _..� Current 179,119 1378 Planned 210,000 1615 Increased Capacity 237 Increase as °io 17.24;u, MACC $102,443,200 Proportionate Share $ 17,661,713 The District will use the above formulas created as a base for future Capital Facilities Plans during the life of the current bond authorization. The capacity of these schools may vary from year to year as programs are added or changed and constriction cost may increase over time. FACILITIES CAPACITY Permanent Facility Capacity: Changes to the Building Program Capacities calculation are found on page 17. Capacity Summaries: The changes in the Capacity Summary are a reflection of the changes in the capacities and student forecast. New schools and increased capacity at current buildings are shown as increases to capacity. Capacity Summaries are found on pages 25-28. Student Generation Factor Analysis: Federal Way Public Schools student generation factor was determined separately for single-family units and multi-family units. The factors used in the 2019 Capital Facilities Plan were derived using actual generation factors from single-family units and multi-family units that were constructed in the District in the last Five (5) years and can be found on the next page Temporary Facility Cost: The list of portables reflects the movement of portables between facilities or new portables purchased. Portable Locations can be found on pages 1S and 19. i I c r 9m 1111 M � �U m' I�� i�• f � N :� � NI a N � 4 � G N W o a A i 8 rr v `a m U u a o a ra SY u a u s r r m r-� W Im b O a H 0.Ce p 2 S N c Z .1-m y v G c I w c OE C i 7 tia ai a EE Eva .. ,. 5 T I T w d p 3 � a Q z c n z � Q LLJ w @ w IL E m s m r g C p � i AI u �O , c� � Iau � m ✓' > �� v O � U to v .� III .[ _;; I Q p) a. F,IS . FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2019 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN IMPACT FEE CALCULATION CHANGES FROM 2018 TO 2019 Item From/To Comment Per cent ofPernwnentFacilities 95,86%to 95.11% Report#3OSPI Percent Temporary Facilities 4.14°/e to 4.89% Updated portable inventory Average Cost of Portable $172,993 to$189,188 Updated 5-yr rolling average of Classrooms portables purchased and placed by 2016. Construction Cost Allocation $21323 to$225,97 Change eilective Judy 2017 State Match 65,59% to 65,15% Change effective July 2017 Average A^se:+sed Waluc Per Puget Sound Educational SFR- $294,328 to $327,803 Service District(LSD 121) MFR- $109,489 to 5119,431 Capital Bond Interest Rate 3.95% to 3.85% Market Rate Property Tax Levy Rate $1.31 to $1.20 King County Treasury Division Student Generation Factors Updated IHou ing NnvcWory Single-Fatrnly Vnl SImL nl yeiev'aline/rrrlm vl7r ecru Elementary .2200 to .2244 e'iwf;le/artily um is mebased on ncrc f rvplirpm<vh I, a VII m tl iu uhbr rh, I)i ce Middle School .1202 to .1073 oe e,rr the(rr rl lne trt urea,prior lu the dnie oJ' High School .1429 to .1390 he lee calculation MuItFFamily 4teuFcrm p;rrnnoliMt fnckin/br m-e eseulG- Elementary ,5970 to.5865 inrnily Imo rr (v eerd oee ree w rt I,lnp rn-„u wre'!r uewd ee(thm dhr. /)weral or", llie 1(m Middle School .2369to .2701 tnej5lyensprmr II,rhraohlofth,tIre High School 3228 to .2808 ealailo!rare hIur c( Few SFR- $6,842 to $7,221 SFR based on the updated calculation MF'R- $20,086 to$19,454 MFR based on the updated calculation City of Kent SFR- $6,842 to$7,221 SFR based on the updated calculation MFR- $20,086 to$8,386 MFR maximum per City of Kent Ordinance No. 4278 Each Scholar: A Voice, A Dream. A BRIGHT Future. In an environment of high expectations, high support, and no excuses, the staff of Federal Way Public Schools will continually learn, lead, utilize data, and collaborate to ensure our scholars have a voice, a dream, and a bright future. THE EARLY N �, WHOLE CHILD: 01/ BUILDINGG THE THE THRIVING, FOUNDATION CONFIDENT, RESPONSIBLE INDIVIDUALS Y nJt ga t' touiy 1 cell �IIGe nnl ttml.RNCW[reHAmP^I lu4 ...rynemm.M arrtl ya0dml in MOJmumu¢avmurseP gmJelrrd ni:ipwwpeµ'A flwlldWlmempy, ,,"n''a nn'An, maaenixa�l p uwe I m�Isna,. :111", ACTIVE LEARNERS: ENGAGED, EM CRITIC CRITICAL THINKERS IwQe:wuvwrw rwM imp±nnM'w2b,zwwtnWF NoMnmYvrYrvmw,Ml�laah mq'�pHwtbatt�i'nbp uddtiMn+d owyn 4DNtEN1AREA �� �^! PERSISTENCE }r EworrEna '�,/ TO GRADUATION: �,y{/�'/ LL SURRTOP RIGNSCHOOL MrI ALL 50RSF.CTS GRADUATION THRg0GN SUCCESSFUL TRANS ITIONS RwNuaq*ht0b4VendrA Ixala rv✓ti r,MPtl^ugy tanry ILL OL',oimcnn ME,In lin, nm rnaa ,aniwnvnn51 nrvi.�,lian�,Inti�m eani urz�,xm lnei� uoeM neMstkol yimn6n,p aaeumu gamam LwNi�ih y,Jam .xibA.Mab s,fiuulmaily ln,m�,gn�rmu,unn Me mJ OIttJi9Mz ' pxwnau�Mtyeyiailune[a FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Each Scholar: A voice. A dream. A BRIGHT future, This document is published by the Business Services Department of the Federal Way Public Schools, May 201E i I Auburn School Distri"No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2018 through, 2024 fir' �o a i Adopted by the Auburn School District Board of Directors June 11, 2018 / SCHOOL DISTRICT ENGAGE - EDUCATE • EMPOWER U. SCHOOL DISTRICT ENGAGE - EDUCATE - EMPOWER 915 Fourth Street NE Auburn, Washington 98002 (253) 931-4900 Serving Students in: Unincorporated King County City of Auburn City of Algona City of Kent City of Pacific City of Black Diamond BOARD of DIRECTORS Anne Baunach Laurie Bishop Robyn Mulenga Ryan Van Quill Ray Vefik Dr. Alan Spicciati, Superintendent Table of Contents Section I Executive Summary ....................... Page 1 Section 11 Enrollment Projections.....................Page 6 Section III Standard of Service........................ Page 8 Section IV Inventory of Facilities....................... Page 16 Section V Pupil Capacity............................... Page 20 Section VI Capital Construction Plan. Page 23 Section VII Impact Fees_.......... ......... Page 27 Section VIII Appendices_..,__.... ... Page 31 Appendix A.1 -Student Enrollment Projections Page 32 Appendix A.2 -Capital Facilities Plan Projections Page 45 Appendix A.3 -Student Generation Survey Page 50 I Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2018 through 2024 Section I Executive Summary Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2018 through 2024 I. Executive Summary This six-year Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") has been prepared by the Auburn School District (the "District") as the District's principal planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act and the adopted ordinances of the counties and cities served by the District. This Plan was prepared using data available in the spring of 2018. This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the District. However, this Plan is not intended to be the sole plan for all of the District's needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic long-range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board Policies and actions, taking into account a longer or a shorter time period; other factors and trends in the use of facilities; and other needs of the District as may be required. However, any such plan or plans will be consistent with this six-year Capital Facilities Plan. To enable the collection of impact fees in the unincorporated areas of King County and within the City of Auburn and City of Kent, the King County Council, the City of Auburn and the City of Kent will adopt this Plan by reference as part of each jurisdiction's respective comprehensive plan. To enable the collection of impact fees in the Cities of Algona, Pacific, and Black Diamond, these municipalities must also adopt this Plan and adopt school impact fee ordinances. Pursuant to the requirements of the Growth Management Act and the local ordinances, this Plan will be updated on an annual basis, and any changes in the fee schedule(s) adjusted accordingly. The Plan establishes the District's"standard of service" in order to ascertain the District's current and future capacity. While the State Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines do not account for the local program needs of the District. The Growth Management Act and the school impact fee ordinance authorize the District to define its standard of service based on the District's specific needs. In general, the District's current standard provides that class size for grades K-3 should not exceed 17 students and class size for grades 4-5 should not exceed 25 students. When averaged over the six elementary grades, this computes to 19.67 students per classroom. Class size for grades 6-12 should not exceed 30 students, with some subject areas restricted to lesser numbers. Decisions by current legislative actions may create the need for additional classrooms. (See Section III for more specific information.) The capacity of the schools in the District is calculated based on this standard of service and the existing inventory of facilities including transitional classrooms. The District's 2017-18 capacity was 14,717. The actual number of individual students was 16,525 as of October 1, 2017. (See Section V for more specific information.) 2 The Capital Construction Plan shown in Section VI addresses the additions and proposed modernization to the District's existing facilities. The plan includes the replacement of five elementary schools and one middle school, construction of two new elementary schools, and acquisition of future school sites to accommodate growth. The new facilities are required to meet the projected elementary school class size reductions mandated by the State of Washington and student population increases generated by the large development areas within the Auburn School District. Three areas that have significant impact on the school district are the Lakeland South, Lea Hill, and the Auburn west hill and valley areas of the district. There are other pockets of development that impact the District as well. The District completed a comprehensive review of all district facilities in October 2008. A Steering Committee made recommendations to the Board for capital improvements to existing facilities and replacement of seven schools over the next ten years. These recommendations led to a capital improvements levy and a bond issue that was placed on the ballot in March 2009. Both ballot measures were unsuccessful in March. The Board determined to rerun only the capital improvements levy in November 2009, which the voters approved. In the fall of 2011, the Board determined to move forward with the Auburn High School Modernization and Reconstruction Project and placed the project before the voters in February of 2012. The bond issue was supported by the community at nearly 57% approval rate, but was short of the super majority requirement of 60%. In March of 2012, the Board determined to rerun the bond in November of 2012. In November 2012, the bond passed at 62%. The project was completed during the summer of 2016. In the spring of 2016, the Board determined to move forward with the replacement of six schools and the construction of two new elementary schools. The project was placed before the voters in November 2016 and the bond passed at 62.83%. The first of the projects, the replacement of Olympic Middle School, started construction in May 2018. The School Impact Fee Ordinances adopted by King County, the City of Auburn and the City of Kent provide for the assessment of impact fees to assist in meeting some of the fiscal impacts incurred by a district experiencing growth and development. Section VII sets forth the proposed school impact fees for single family and multi-family dwelling units. The student generation factors have been developed using the students who actually attend school in the Auburn School District from single family and multi-family developments constructed in the last five years. There have been dramatic changes in the student generation factors for single and multi-family in the past five years. The District plans to carefully monitor the numbers over the next several years to determine if this is a trend or an anomaly. The method of collecting the data is with the use of GIS mapping software, data from King County and Pierce County GIS, data from Davis Demographics and integration of the mapping with student data from the District's student data system. This method gives the District actual student generation numbers for each grade span for identified developments. This data is contained in Appendix A.3. 3 Aubum School District No.408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2018 through 2024 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Listed below is a summary level outline of the changes from the 2017 Capital Facilities Plan that are a part of the 2018 Plan. The changes are noted by Section for ease of reference. Section I Executive Summary A. Updated to reflect new information within the Plan. B. Summary level list of changes from previous year, Section 11 Enrollment Projections Updated projections. See Appendices A.1 &K2. Section III Standard of Service A. Reduction of maximum K-3 class size from between 18.23 and 24 students to 17 students at elementary schools. B. Reduction of maximum fourth grade class size from 26 students to 25 students. C. Reduction of maximum 5th grade class size from 29 students to 25 students. Section IV Inventory of Facilities A. Add 2 portables at Alpac Elementary School. B. Add 3 portables at Lea Hill Elementary School. C. Add 1 portable at Terminal Park Elementary School. D. Add 1 portable at Washington Elementary School. E. Remove 1 portable from Pioneer Elementary School, Section V Pupil Capacity The six portables to be placed and the one portable to be relocated in August 2018 are needed to accommodate enrollment increases. 4 Auburn School District No.408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2018 through 2024 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Impact Fees CHANGES TO IMPACT FEE DATA ELEMENTS 2017 to 2018 CPF CPF DATA ELEMENTS 2017 2018 EXPLANATION Student Generation Factors Single Family Consistent with King County Ordinance 11621, Elementary 0.1930 0.2340 Student Generation Factors are calculated Middle School 0.0770 0.0970 by the school district based on district Sr. High 0.0730 0.1230 records of average actual student generation Multi-Family rates for new developments constructed Elementary 0.1030 0.2190 over the last five years. Middle School 0.0310 0.1070 Sr. High 0.0440 0.1060 School Construction Costs Elementary $48,500,000 $60,200,000 From new school construction cost estimate in April 2018- Site Acquisition Costs Cost per acre $434,136 $344,240 Updated estimate based on 2.5%annual inflatior Area Cost Allowance Boeckh Index $213.23 $225.97 Updated to projected SPI schedule. (July 2018) Match % -State 63.29% 64.99% Updated to current SPI schedule (May 2017) Match % - District 36.71% 35.01% Computed District Average AV Single Family $292,035 $373,974 Updated from March 2018 King County Dept of Assessments data. Multi-Family $127,147 $139,135 Updated from March 2018 King County Dept of Assessments data using average AV for apartments and condominiums. Debt Serv, Tax Rate $2.65 $2.41 Current Fiscal Year GO Bond Int Rate 3.95% 3.27% Current Rate (Bond Buyers 20 Index 3-14) Section Vill Appendices Appendix A.1 - Updated enrollment projections from October 1, 2017 Appendix A 2 - Updated enrollment projections with anticipated buildout schedule from April 2018 Appendix A.3 -Student Generation Survey April 2018 5 Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2018 through 2024 Section II Enrollment Projections i Auburn School District No.408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2018 through 2024 ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS The Auburn School District uses a modified cohort survival model to project future enrollment for all of the District's operations. Table 11.1 is an extract from the comprehensive projection model found in Appendix A.2 titled "CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Enrollment Projections". This Table shows the anticipated enrollment for the next six years based on the previous six year history of the District under the assumptions set forth in the comprehensive projections, Appendix A.1, and the projection for additional students generated from new developments in the district as shown in Appendix A.2. TABLE ASD ENROLLMENT 11.1 PROJECTIONS (April 20181 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-2024 GRADE Actual Projected Projected Proiected Projected Projected Projected KDG 1261 1294 1326 1359 1391 1424 1457 1 1276 1320 1353 1386 1418 1451 1463 2 1252 1314 1359 1391 1424 1456 1489 3 1328 1284 1346 1391 1423 1456 1488 4 1329 1355 1311 1373 1418 1450 1483 5 1269 1361 1387 1343 1 1406 1450 1483 K-5 7715 7926 8082 8243 8480 8687 8883 6 1207 1268 1360 1386 1342 1405 1449 7 1194 1240 1301 1394 1420 1376 1438 8 1183 1221 1268 1329 1421 1447 1403 6-8 3584 3729 3929 4109 4183 4228 4290 9 1258 1357 1395 1442 1503 1595 1521 10 1300 1287 1386 1424 1470 1531 1624 11 1249 J 1288 1274 1374 1412 1458 1519 12 1419 1347 1386 1372 1472 1510 1556 9 - 12 5226 5279 5441 5612 5857 6094 6320 TOTALS 16,525 16,936 17,452 17,964 18,520 19,009 19,493 GRADES K-12 Actual Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected I Projected K-5 7715 7928 8082 8243 8480 8687 6883 6-8 3584 3729 3929 4109 4183 4228 4290 9-12 5226 5279 5441 5612 5857 6094 6320 K-12 16,525 16,936 17.452 17,964 18.520 19,009 19.493 7 i Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2018 through 2024 Section III Standard of Service Auburn School Distnct No.408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 201E through 2024 STANDARD OF SERVICE The School Impact Fee Ordinances adopted by King County, the City of Auburn and the City of Kent indicate that each school district must establish a "Standard of Service"in order to ascertain the overall capacity to house its projected student population. The Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage "capacity"guidelines for computing state funding support. The fundamental purpose of the SPI guidelines is to provide a vehicle to equitably distribute state matching funds for school construction projects. By default these guidelines have been used to benchmark the district's capacity to house its student population. The SPI guidelines do not make adequate provision for local district program needs, facility configurations, emerging educational reform, or the dynamics of each student's educational program. The Auburn School District Standard of Service addresses those local considerations that require space in excess of the SPI guidelines. The effect on the space requirements for both permanent and relocatable facilities is shown below for each grade articulation pattern. Conditions that may result in potential space needs are provided for information purposes without accompanying computations. OVERVIEW The Auburn School District operates fourteen elementary schools housing 7,715 students in grades K through 5. The four middle schools house 3,884 students in grades 6 through 8. The District operates three comprehensive senior high schools and one alternative high school, housing 5,226 students in grades 9 through 12. CLASS SIZE The number of pupils per classroom determines the number of classrooms required to house the student population. Specialists create additional space needs. Class sizes are subject to collective bargaining agreements. Changes to class size agreements can have significant impact on available space. The current pupillteacher limit across all elementary programs is an average of 19.67 students per teacher. Consistent with this staffing limit, room capacities are set at 19.67 students per room at grades K-5. At grades 6 - 12 the limit is set at 30 pupils per room. The SPI space allocation for each grade articulation level, less the computed reduction for the Auburn School District Standard of Service, determines the District's capacity to house projected pupil populations. These reductions are shown below by grade articulation level. ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS STRUCTURED LEARNING FOR DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates a structured learning program for students with moderate to severe disabilities at the elementary school level which currently uses 14 classrooms to provide for 115 students, The housing requirements for this program are provided for in the SPI space guidelines, No loss of capacity is expected unless population with disabilities grows at a disproportionate rate compared to total elementary population. PATHWAYS SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates an adaptive behavior program for students with behavior disabilities at the elementary school level. The program uses two classrooms to provide for 22 students. The housing requirements for this program exceed the SPI space allocations. (Two classrooms @ 19,67- 11 = 8.67) Loss of Permanent Capacity 2 rooms @ 8.67 each = (17) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 8.67 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss = (17) 9 Auburn School District No.408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2018 through 2024 STANDARD OF SERVICE I SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program at the elementary level for special education students requiring instruction to address their specific disabilities. Sixteen standard classrooms are required to house this program. The housing requirements for this program exceed the SPI space guidelines. Continued loss of capacity is expected as growth in program is larger than the total elementary population. Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 (16-8) rooms @ 19.67 each = (157) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 19.67 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss = (157) NATIVE AMER/CAN RESOURCE ROOM The Auburn School District operates one resource room to support the education of Native American students at the elementary level. One standard classroom is fully dedicated to serve these students. Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 room @ 19.67 each = (20) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 19.67 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss = (20) HEAD START The Auburn School District operates a Head Start program for approximately 114 pre-school aged children in six sections of 1/2 day in length. The program is housed at three elementary schools and utilizes three standard elementary classrooms and auxiliary office spaces. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 3 rooms @ 19.67 each = (59) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 19.67 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss = (59) EARLY CHILDHOOD SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates a pre-school program for young children below age five with disabilities. This program is housed at eight different elementary schools and currently uses 12 standard classrooms. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 12 rooms @ 19.67 each = (236) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 19.67 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss = (236) READING LABS The Auburn School District operates a program for students needing remediation and additional language arts instruction. These programs utilize non-standard classroom spaces if available in each elementary school. Four elementary schools do not have non-standard rooms available, thus they are housed in a standard classroom. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Lass of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 19 67 each = (79) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 19.67 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss = (79) 10 Auburn School District No.408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2018 through 2024 STANDARD OF SERVICE MUSIC ROOMS The Auburn School District elementary music programs require one acoustically modified classroom at each j school for music instruction. The housing requirements are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 14 rooms @ 19,67 each = (275) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 19.67 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss = (275) ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates pullout programs at the elementary school level for students learning English as a second language. This program requires 21 standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 21 rooms @ 19.67 each = (413) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 19.67 each = D Total Capacity Loss = (413) SECOND GRADE TOSA PROGRAM The Auburn School District provides a TOSA reading specialist program for eight highly impacted elementary schools. This pullout model provides direct instruction to students who are not at grade level and do not receive other services. This program requires eight standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 rooms @ 19.67 each = (157) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 19.67 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss = (157) ELEMENTARY LEARNING SPECIALIST PROGRAM The Auburn School District provides a learning specialist program to increase literacy skills for first and second graders. This program model was originally created from the 1-726 funds and currently has the specialist going into existing teacher classrooms, as well as pulling out students into designated classrooms. The district is utilizing classrooms at all fourteen elementary schools. Loss of Permanent Capacity 14 rooms @ 19.67 each = (275) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 19.67 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss = (275) EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates an ECEAP program for 132 pre-school aged children in six sections of half-day length and one full-day program. The program is housed at one elementary school and two off-site locations and utilizes one standard elementary classroom and three additional classroom spaces and auxiliary office spaces. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 19.67 each = (79) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 19.67 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss = (79) 11 Auburn School District No.408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2018 through 2024 STANDARD OF SERVICE MIDDLE SCHOOLS SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program for each grade at the middle school level. This is to accommodate special education students needing remedial instruction to address their specific disabilities. Eleven classrooms are required at the middle school level to provide for approximately 282 students. The housing requirements for this program are not entirely provided for in the SPI space guidelines. PATHWAYS SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District offers a self-contained program for students with moderate to severe behavior disabilities. The program is housed at one of the middle schools and uses two classrooms. One of the two classrooms for this program are provided for in the SPI space allocations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 rooms @ 30 each = (30) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (30) STRUCTURED LEARNING CENTER AND DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates five structured learning classrooms at the middle school level for students with moderate to severe disabilities and one developmentally disabled classroom for students with profound disabilities. Two of the five classrooms for this program are provided for in the SPI space allocations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 3 rooms @ 30 each = (90) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (90) NATIVE AMERICAN RESOURCE ROOM The Auburn School District operates one resource room to support the education of Native American students at the middle school level. One standard classroom is fully dedicated to serve these students. Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 room @ 30 each = (30) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (30) MIDDLE SCHOOL COMPUTER LABS The Auburn School District operates a minimum of one computer lab at each of the four middle schools. This program utilizes a standard classroom. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Lass of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 30 each = (120) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (120) ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at the middle school level for English Language Learner students. This program requires seven standard classrooms that are not provide for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 7 rooms @ 30 each = (210) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (210) 12 Auburn School District No,408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2018 through 2024 STANDARD OF SERVICE j ROOM UTILIZATION The Auburn School District provides a comprehensive middle school program that includes elective options in special interest areas. Facilities to accommodate special interest activities are not amenable to standard classroom usage. The district averages 95% utilization of all available teaching stations. SPI Report#3 dated 12/14/11 identifies 148 teaching stations available in the mid-level facilities. The utilization pattern results in a loss of approximately 8 teaching stations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 rooms @ 30 each = (240) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (240) SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS NATIVE AMERICAN RESOURCE ROOM The Auburn School District operates one resource room to support the education of Native American students at the high school level. One standard classroom is fully dedicated to serve these students. Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 room @ 30 each = (30) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (30) SENIOR HIGH COMPUTER LABS The Auburn School District operates two computer labs at each of the senior high schools. This program utilizes two standard classrooms at comprehensive high schools and one at West Auburn. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 7 rooms @ 30 each = (210) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (210) ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at three comprehensive high schools for English Language Learner students. This program requires five standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 5 rooms @ 30 each = (150) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (150) PATHWAYS SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District offers a self-contained program for students with moderate to severe behavior diabilities. The program is housed at one of the high schools and uses two classrooms. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space allocations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 2 rooms @ 30 each = (60) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (60) 13 Auburn School District No.408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2018 through 2024 STANDARD OF SERVICE STRUCTURED LEARNING CENTER PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates nine structured learning center classrooms for students with moderate to severe disabilities. This program is housed at two high schools requiring eight standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 rooms @ 30 each = (240) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (240) SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program at the senior high level for special education students requiring instruction to address their specific learning disabilities. The current high school program requires 14 classrooms to provide program to meet educational needs of the students. The SPI space guidelines provide for one of the 14 teaching stations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 13 rooms @ 30 each = (390) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (390) PERFORMING ARTS CENTERS Auburn High School includes 25,000 square feet used exclusively for a Performing Arts Center. The SPI Inventory includes this space when computing unhoused student capacity. This space was not intended for, nor is it usable for, classroom instruction. It was constructed to provide a community center for the performing arts. Using SPI capacity guidelines, 25,000 square feet computes to 208 unhoused students or 8.33 classrooms. Loss of Permanent Capacity 8.33 rooms @ 30 each = (250) ROOM UTILIZATION The Auburn School District provides a comprehensive high school program that includes numerous elective options in special interest areas. Facilities to accommodate special interest activities are not amenable to standard classroom usage. The district averages 95% utilization of all available teaching stations. There are 185 teaching stations available in the senior high facilities. The utilization pattern results in a loss of approximately 10 teaching stations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 10 rooms @ 30 each = (300) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (300) 14 Auburn School Distnct No.408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2018 through 2024 STANDARD OF SERVICE STANDARD OF SERVICE COMPUTED TOTALS ELEMENTARY Loss of Permanent Capacity (1,768) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (1,768) MIDDLE SCHOOL Loss of Permanent Capacity (720) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (720) SENIOR HIGH Loss of Permanent Capacity (1,630) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (1,630) TOTAL Loss of Permanent Capacity (4,118) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (4,118) 15 I I Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2018 through 2024 Section IV Inventory of Facilities Auburn School District No.408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2018 through 2024 INVENTORY OF FACILITIES Table IV.1 shows the current inventory of permanent district facilities and their OSPI rated capacities. Table IV.2 shows the number and location of each portable unit by school. The district uses relocatable facilities to: 1. provide interim housing in school attendance areas uniquely impacted by increasing school populations that would otherwise require continual redistricting, 2 make space available for changing program requirements and offerings determined by unique student needs, and 3. provide housing to cover district needs until permanent facilities can be financed and constructed. Relocatable facilities are deemed to be interim, stop gap measures that often place undesirable stress on existing physical plants. Core facilities (i.e. gymnasiums, restrooms, kitchens, labs, lockers, libraries, etc.) are not of sufficient size or quantity to handle the increased school population served by adding relocatable classrooms. Table Permanent Facilities District School Facilities IV @ OSPI Rated Capacity (March 2018) Building Capacity_,m Acres Address Elementary Schools Washington Elementary m 486 5,40 20 E Street Northeast,Auburn WA„ 98002 Terminal Park Elementary 70 1101 D Street Southeast,Auburn WA, 98002 Dick Scobee Elementary 477 10.50 1031 14th Street Northeast,Auburn WA. 98002 Pioneer Elementary 441 8,30 2301 M Street Southeast.Auburn WA 98002 Chinook Elementary 440 8.75 3502 Auburn Way South, Auburn WA, 98092 Lea Hill Elementarvuuuuuuwu 450 10.00 30908 124th Avenue Southeast. Auburn WA, 98092 Gildo Rev Elementary 551 10.00 1005 37th Street Southeast. Auburn WA. 98002 Evergreen Heichts Elem. 456 8.09 5602 South 316th,Auburn WA, 98001 Alpac Elementary 497 10.60 310 Milwaukee_Boulevard North, Pacific WA, 98047 Lake View Elementary 559 16.40 16401 Southeast 318th Street.Auburn WA. 98092 Hazelwood Elementary 580 12.67 11815 Southeast 304th Street,Auburn WA, 98092 Ilalko Elementary 585 1200. 301 Oravetz Place Southeast,Auburn WA, 98092 --- - - __Lakeland Hills Elementary 594 1200. 1020 Evergreen Way SE, Auburn WA, 98092 Arthur Jacobsen Elementary 614 10,00 29205 132nd Street SE,Auburn WA, 98092 ELEMENTARY CAPACITY _ 7.138 Middle Schools Cascade Middle School 829 17.30 1015 24th Street Northeast. Auburn WA. 98002 Olvmoic Middle School _ 921 17,40 1825 K Street Southeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Rainier Middle School 843 26,33 30620 116th Avenue Southeast, Auburn WA.98092 Mt. Baker Middle School 837 30.88 620 37th Street Southeast. Auburn WA. 98002 MIDDLE SCHOOL CAPACITY 3,430 Senior High Schools West Auburn HS 233 5.10 401 West Main Street. Auburn WA. 98001 Auburn HS 2.100 20,50 1 711 East Main Street, Auburn WA, 98002 Auburn Riverside HS 1.387 33.00 501 Oravetz Road.Auburn WA, 98092 Auburn Mountainview HS 1.443 40.00 28900 124" Ave SE.Auburn WA. 98092 HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITY 5A64 TOTAL CAPACITY 15,732 17 �` ¥®� » ` �' * . _ �f 7 . ¥ .__� ) � . { � \ } ` \ ; « © § \�/ . / . m- m* . \ \ «« z & & Auburn School District No.408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2018 through 2024 INVENTORY OF FACILITIES TABLE I TEMPORARYIRELOCATABLE IV.2 FACILITIES INVENTORY (June 2018) Elementary Location 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021 22 2022-2023 2023-2024 2024-2025 Washington 6 6 6 6 7 8 8 Terminal Park 7 7 7 7 7 0 0 Dick Scobee 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,Pioneer 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 '.Chinook 6 6 6 0 0 0 0 'Lea Hill 9 9 9 9 0 0 0 Gildo Rey 7 7 8 8 8 9 9 Evergreen Heights 4 4 6 6 6 6 6 Alpac B 8 8 B 8 9 9 Lake View 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 Hazelwood 2 3 4 4 5 6 6 Ilalko 6 7 7 7 8 9 9 Lakeland Hills Elementary 7 7 7 8 8 8 8 Arthur Jacobsen Elemental 4 5 6 6 6 6 6 TOTAL UNITS 81 77 77 72 66 64 64 TOTAL CAPACITY 1,593 1,515 1,515 1,416 11298 1.259 1.259 Middle School Location 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-2023 2023-2024 2024-2025 Cascade 0 0 0 2 4 5 5 Olympic 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Rainier 5 7 7 8 9 10 10 Mt. Baker 9 10 10 10 11 11 11 TOTAL UNITS 14 17 17 20 24 26 26 TOTAL CAPACITY 420 510 510 600 720 780 780 Sr. High School Location 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-2023 2023-2024 2024-2025 West Auburn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '.Auburn High School 0 0 0 1 2 2 2 Auburn High School-"TAP 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Auburn Riverside 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 Auburn Mountainview 4 5 5 6 7 7 7 TOTAL UNITS 18 19 19 21 23 23 23 TOTAL CAPACITY 540 570 570 630 690 690 690 ^TAP-Transition Assistance Program for 18-21 year old students with special needs, COMBINED TOTAL UNITS 113 113 113 113 113 113 113 COMBINED TOTAL CAPACITY 2,553 2,595 2,595 2,646 2,708 2,729 2,729 19 i Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2018 through 2024 Section V Pupil Capacity Auburn School District No,408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2018 through 2024 PUPIL CAPACITY i While the Auburn School District uses the SPI inventory of permanent facilities as the data from which to determine space needs, the District's educational program requires more space than that provided for under the formula. This additional square footage is converted to numbers of pupils in Section III, Standard of Service. The District's capacity is adjusted to reflect the need for additional space to house its programs. Changes in the capacity of the district recognize new funded facilities. The combined effect of these adjustments is shown on Line B in Tables VA and V.2 below. Table V.1 shows the Distict's capacity with relocatable units included and Table V.2 without these units. Table V.1 Capacity WITH relocatables 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-2025 A. SPI Capacity 15,732 15,732 15,732 16,382 17,032 17,032 17,032 A.1 SPI Capacity-New Elem 650 650 B. Capacity Adjustments (1,565) (1,523) (1.523) (1,472) (1,410) (1,389) (1,389) C. Net Capacity 14,167 141209 14,859 15,560 15,622 15,643 15,643 D. ASD Enrollment 16,937 17,453 17,963 18,520 19,009 19,493 19,963 3/ E. ASD Surplus/Deficit (2,770) (3,244) (3,104) (2,960) (3,387) (3,850) (4,320) CAPACITY ADJUSTMENTS Include Relocatable 2,553 2,595 2,595 2,646 2,708 2,729 2,729 21 Exclude SOS 14 (4,118) (4,118) 4,118) (4,118) (4,118) (4,118) (4,118) Total Adjustments (1,565) (1,523) (1,523) (1,472) (1,410) (1,389) (1,389) Table V.2 Capacity WITHOUT relocatables 2018-19 12019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-2025 A SPI Capacity 15,732 15,732 15,732 16,382 17,032 17,032 17,032 A.1 SPI Capacity-New Elem 650 650 B. Capacity Adjustments 4,118 4,118 (4,118) (4_118) (4,118 (4,118) (4,118 C. Net Capacity 11,614 11,614 12,264 12,914 12,914 12,914 12,914 D. ASD Enrollment 16,937 17,453 17,963 18,520 19,009 19,493 19,963 3/ E, ASD Surplus/Deficit (5,323) (5,839) (5,699) (5,606) (6,095) (6,579) (7,049), CAPACITY ADJUSTMENTS 2/ Exclude SOS 14 (4,118) (4,118) (4,118) (4,118) (4,118) (4,118) (4,118) Total Adjustments (4,118) (4,118) (4,118) (4,118) (4,118) (411% (4,118) 1/ New facilities shown in 2019-20 through 2023-24 are funded by the 2016 School Bond Issue. 2/ The Standard of Service represents 26.18%of SPI capacity. When new facilities are added the Standard of Service computations are decreased to 24,18% of SPI capacity. 3/ Students beyond the capacity are accommodated in other spaces (commons, library, theater, shared teaching space). 21 Auburn School District No.408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2018 through 2024 PERMANENT FACILITIES PUPIL CAPACITY @ SPI Rated Capacity (March 2018) A. Elementary Schools Buildino 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 Washington 486 486 486 486 486 486 486 Terminal Park 408 408 408 408 408 408 408 Dick Scobee 477 477 477 477 477 477 477 Pioneer 441 441 441 441 441 441 441 Chinook 440 440 440 440 440 440 440 Lea Hill 450 450 450 450 450 450 450 Gildo Rey 551 551 551 551 551 551 551 Evergreen Heights 456 456 456 456 456 456 456 Alpac 497 497 497 497 497 497 497 Lake View 559 559 559 559 559 559 559 Hazelwood 580 580 580 580 580 580 580 Ilalko 585 585 585 585 585 585 585 Lakeland Hills 594 594 594 594 594 594 594 .Arthur Jacobsen 614 614 614 614 614 614 614 Elementary#15 650 650 650 650 650 'Elementary#16 650 65D 650 650 ELEMENTARY CAPACITY 7.138 7,138 7,788 8,438 8,438 8,438 8,438 B. Middle Schools Buildinu 2018-19 2019-20 ', 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 Cascade 829 829 829 829 829 829 829 Olympic 921 921 921 921 921 921 921 Rainier 843 843 843 843 843 843 843 Mt. Baker 837 837 837 837 837 837 837 MIDDLE SCHOOL CAPACITY 3,430 3,430 3,430 3,430 3,430 3,430 3,430 C, Senior High Schools Building 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 West Auburn 233 233 233 233 233 233 233 Auburn 2,101 2,101 2,101 2,101 2,101 2,101 2,101 Auburn Riverside 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 Auburn Mountainview 1,443 1,443 1,443 1,443 1,443 1,443 1,443 HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITY 5,164 5,164 5,164 5,164 5,164 5,164 5,164 COMBINED CAPACITY 1 15.,732 1 15,732 16,382 1 17,032 1 17,032 17,032 17,p32 22 i I Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2018 through 2024 Section VI Capital Construction Plan Aubum School District No.400 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2018 through 2024 CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN The formal process used by the Board to address current and future facility needs began in 1974 with the formation of a community wide citizens committee. The result of this committee's work was published in the document titled 'Guidelines for Development.' In 1985 the Board formed a second Ad Hoc citizens committee to further the work of the first and address the needs of the District for subsequent years. The work of this committee was published in the document titled 'Directions for the Nineties.' In 1995 the Board commissioned a third Ad Hoc citizens committee to make recommendations for improvements to the District's programs and physical facilities. The committee recommendations are published in the document titled 'Education Into The Twenty-First Century-- A Community Involved.' The 1995 Ad Hoc committee recommended the District develop plans for the implementation, funding, and deployment of technology throughout the District's programs. The 1996 Band proposition provided funding to enhance the capacity of each facility to accommodate technological applications. The 1998 Capital Levy provided funding to further deploy technology at a level sufficient to support program requirements in every classroom and department. In 2005 and 2014, replacement technology levies were approved to continue to support technology across all facets of the District's teaching, learning and operations. In addition to the technology needs of the District, the Ad Hoc committee recognized the District must prepare for continued student enrollment growth. As stated in their report, "the District must pursue an appropriate high school site as soon as possible." The Ad Hoc recommendation included commentary that the financing should be timed to maintain consistent rates of tax assessments. A proposition was approved by the voters on April 28, 1998 that provided $8,000,000 over six years to address some of the technology needs of the District; and $5,000,000 to provide funds to acquire school sites. During the 1997-98 school year, a Joint District Citizen's Ad Hoc Committee was appointed by the Auburn and Dieringer School Boards to make recommendations on haw best to serve the school population from an area that includes a large development known as Lakeland South. Lakeland South at that time was immediately adjacent to the southern boundary of the Auburn School District. On June 16, 1998, the Ad Hoc Committee presented its recommendation at a joint meeting of the Auburn and Dieringer Boards of Directors. On June 22, 1998, the Auburn School Board adopted Resolution No. 933 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries of the District in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. On June 23, 1998, the Dieringer School Board adopted a companion Resolution No. 24-97-98 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. These actions resulted in the transfer of an area from Dieringer to Auburn containing most of the Lakeland South development and certain other undeveloped properties. Property for the third comprehensive high school was acquired in 1999. The Board placed the proposition to construction a new high school on the ballot four times. Each election was extremely close to passing. After the fourth failure a community meeting was held and from that meeting the Board determined need for further community study. In April of 2002, the Board formed a fifth citizen's Ad Hoc committee to address the following two items and make recommendations to the Board in the Fall of 2002: a. A review of the conclusion and recommendations of 1985 and 1995 Ad Hoc Committees related to accommodating high school enrollment growth. This included the review of possible financing plans for new facilities. b. Develop recommendations for accommodating high school enrollment growth for the next 10 years if a new senior high school is not built. 24 Aubum School District No.408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2018 through 2024 CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN This committee recommended the Board place the high school on the ballot for the fifth time in February 2003. The February election approved the new high school at 68.71%yes votes. The school opened in the fall of 2005. In the fall of 2003, the Board directed the administration to begin the planning and design for Elementary#13 and Elementary#14. In the fall of 2004, the Board passed Resolution No. 1054 to place two elementary schools on the ballot in February 2005, The voters approved the ballot measure in February of 2005 at 64.72%. Lakeland Hills Elementary (Elementary#13) opened in the fall of 2006. Arthur Jacobsen Elementary (Elementary#14) is located in the Lea Hill area and opened in the fall of 2007. These two elementary schools were built to accommodate the housing growth in Lakeland Hills and Lea Hill areas of the school district. In the 2004-05 school year, the Board convened a sixth Citizen's Ad Hoc committee to again study and make recommendations about the future impacts in the District. One of the areas of study was the need for New Facilities and Modernization. The committee made a number of recommendations including school size, the need for a new middle school, and to begin a capital improvements program to modernize or replace facilities based upon criterion. During the 2005-06 school year, a Joint District Citizen's Ad Hoc Committee was appointed by the Auburn and Kent School Boards to make recommendations on how best to serve the school population that will come from an area that includes a number of projected developments in the north Auburn valley. On May 17, 2006, the Ad Hoc Committee presented its recommendation at a joint meeting of the Auburn and Kent Boards of Directors. On June 14, 2006, the Kent School Board adopted Resolution No. 1225 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries of the District in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. On June 26, 2006, the Auburn School Board adopted a companion Resolution No. 1073 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. These actions resulted in the transfer of an area from the Kent School District to the Auburn School District effective September 29, 2006. In October of 2008, after two years of review and study, a Steering Committee made recommendations to the Board regarding the capital improvements program to modernize or replace facilities as recommended by the 2004-05 Citizen's Ad Hoc Committee. These recommendations, based on specific criteria, led to the Board placing a school improvement bond and capital improvements levy on the ballot in March 2009. Voters did not approve either measure that would have updated 24 facilities and replaced three aging schools. The Board decided to place only a six- year Capital Levy on the ballot in November of 2009, which passed at 55.17%. The levy funded $46.4 million of needed improvement projects at 24 sites over the following seven school years. Planning for the replacement of aging schools was started with educational specifications and schematic design process for the replacement of Auburn High School. The District acquired a site for a future high school in 2008 and a second site for a future middle school in 2009. The District also continued efforts to acquire property around Auburn High School. The Special Education Transition Facility opened in February of 2010. This facility is designed for students with disabilities that are 18 to 21 years old. In the November 2012 election, the community supported the $110 million bond issue for the Auburn High School Modernization and Reconstruction Project at 62%. Construction began in February 2013. The entire new building was occupied by Auburn High School students and staff in the fall of 2015, with site improvements being completed during the 2015-16 school year. 25 Auburn School District No,408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2018 through 2024 CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN In January 2015, a citizen's ad hoc committee was convened by direction of the Board to address growth and facilities. The major recommendations were to construct two new elementary schools in the next four years and to acquire 3 new elementary school sites as soon as possible. In the November 2016 election, the community supported the $456 million bond issue for the replacement of six schools and the construction of two new elementary schools at 62.83%. Construction for the replacement of Olympic Middle School began in May 2018. I Within the six-year period, the District is projecting 3,710 additional students. This increase in student population along with anticipated class-size reductions, will require the construction of two new elementary schools and acquiring three new elementary school sites during the six-year window. In addition to new and replacement school construction, this District needs to address several major construction projects to accommodate enrollment growth and continued District use. These projects include replacement of or improvements to the roof at Auburn Memorial Stadium, boiler replacement at Auburn Mountainview,High School, and energy management system replacement at Auburn Riverside High School that are funded by Capital Levy dollars. The table below illustrates the current capital construction plan for the next six years. The exact timelines are wholly dependent on the rate of growth in the school age population. 2018-24 Capital Construction Plan (Mav 2018) Projected Fund Project Timelines Project Funded Cost Source 18-19 19-20 20-21 21-22 22-23 23-24 24-25 , All Facilities - 2013 Technology Yes $22,000,000 6 Year XX XX Modernization Cap. Levy 1/ Portables Yes $2,500,000 IFeast XX XX XX XX Property Purchase - Yes $14,900,000 Bond XX XX XX XX XX XX 1/ 3 New Elementaries Impact Fee Multiple Facility Capital Yes $46,400,000 Improvements Levy XX XX Elementary#15 Yes $48,500,000 Bond XX XX XX 11 Impact Fee plan const open Elementary#16 Yes $48,500,000 Bond XX XX XX 1/ Impact Fee plan const open Replacement of five Yes $242500000 '.. Bond XX XX XX XX XX '.. XX , , 1/ Elementary Schools plan const const const const open Replacement of one Yes $78,000,000 Bond XX XX 1/ Middle School const open 1/ These funds may be secured through a combination of the 2016 Bond Issue,sale of real property, impact fees,and state matching funds.. The District currently is eligible for state matching funds for new construction at the elementary school level and for modernization at the elementary and middle school levels, 26 Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2018 through 2024 Section VII Impact Fees I m q > Q R T T F Rf E r o s 12 E W o o h U - ev ein U 'a'.m N � � .E N E of E N M H LL ^ 0 0 a N o O o 0 .7 m fnp rp aND m D m W 0 0 � O N W U CI W e U p E N N E o 0 o at E o 0 0 E o 0 0 of o 0 0 m rn n W or m rn F W m m r W m m n W LL 0 0 XQ LL O O LL O O N LL 0 0 C C C O N N W Z c E o 0 0 o c E o 0 0 o c E 0 0 o E o 0 0 v tOarM LL v m e rN LL v mvnm c m rc� N � = N O N LD N N O N 9 LL tD m N v N O v a y or".o00 y al0 0 0 CM� v mo0 o N a�o 00 Z N N 47 U VJ fn fn U W N V1 m O J T o Q li o Q L% jp W oQ $ mvpioo U py,'N � vv V U a ¢Uuni � u�i LL � � mmm u m m nW W '" 2 c ','.Emrn rn m 2 �- Emoo p m UJp oLL m W v o00o W rev o00o vU � � � � U p E a O F a H N y vo N ivo ~ y x 4 V a C C0 � o V m' W o w E v a ow ow � _� 'rn N U a U N LL U N �y O 4 N y> Za Za W ❑ LL ' U x ui Fes. E N � tA o ljxcj n ¢ UQ ,� mN ino Z = No Zw000 Ca � vmoo � m `m Z y` o O o '� o 0 0 o W U v a Ln o 0 T T W ca U U � LL U N U � LLU W W W'... a x � N 2 o Q Q c c N U o o WKU( e t t W U # # C Q o ti :E ro �,,,,,, JE cX 2 O iti y N L Q ry v YU WEE WE E a = q E c' E W = E E E = Q E Ej W y lOi W � fn C LL W � f5 � LL W V1 N lL � x & § R ; ) 0 _ / ƒ , LL - - a 2 ) § \ 3 < - � ) »\ ! - ) * ] § } \ } ) ( \ ( \ ! m m § a a 605 \\g ` r -}{ wL) !i } \ \ 65 LU { ) ) ) � ( � � \ j � � i f p o r m m r a v o o r rn� o00 00 CN S O p V rvj m N M N OI O N N N .7 C V O+ � 01 O r c0 � t0 O r V Y1 N V N N Yj Cj E O M M M J v C O t0 Q VJ W r0 O O �O ry ['1 m N N W O a7 °C\j V n ❑ N W 6] N 10 OI O r N ~ p p p 0 uN N m W U N N N � � O E O M � J � O m O r O V a N a o r o i r v'm m m N N 0aEi E u w W w J o' r_m � C d } J_ L O O r m (O N a N M r O O �. Q U W r O N M O N ° o Ol o a m � a N ❑ � O Y] N O JQ W a f0 O W M O N V Gj N O N 01 O N N N J 6] O V p Z fA N M fA ¢ fA fA fA E9 G � t ❑ J J o O o r rn o � m wry r ,o p L ¢LL w m N r N p O N y rn N O O Y� T O U l0 W Y W t0 N m N � O m OI 0 UJ J O O p O M N� In [7 d U mN m»E. < ¢ m m O O N m aO m O p E O O L n L U (y m w O r li LL ri O E d � � p M V Ul N N 7 pj N N C w rn 0 z ¢ r J E to Q a o o m U p U O f2 O U O a a 0 N N w m Q Z 3 -o aaa N Q cpr t m 00 m U N CO C 0 (0 � � 9 � ' O T � } ON N N F O N O w OI O W O V U E D m E m 12 � m o w 0 m o Q y U mO U) m U N Tm Oa }m m rn N Y m in J 40 d N A d d 0 O J LL K v O v m ❑ °� aEi o `o m o fn rpO J of E ❑ Vo ❑ v LL' M E E E E E v) w a C7 K G to - rnmti N m m O O C f 0 o m U OF 0 O C LL LL' LL U O UJ N (n N W D'Y In m U U U J J Y J v m yin a0 � o o � m°O � � O oC� y Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2018 through 2024 Section Vill Appendix Appendix A.1 - Student Enrollment Projections Appendix A.2 - CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Enrollment Projections Appendix A.3 - Student Generation Survey i Appendix A.1 - Student Enrollment Projections i Auburn School District #408 Student Enrollment Projections October 2017 Introduction The projective techniques give some consideration to historical and current data as a basis for forecasting the future. In addition, the `projector' must make certain assumptions about the operant variables within the data being used. These assumptions are"judgmental" by definition. Forecasting can be defined as the extrapolation or logical extension from history to the future, or from the known to the unknown. The attached tabular data reviews the history of student enrollment, sets out some quantitative assumptions, and provides projections based on these numerical factors. The projection logic does not attempt to weigh the individual sociological, psychological, economic, and political factors that are present in any demographic analysis and projection. The logic embraces the assumptions that whatever these individual factors have been in the past are present today, and will be in the future. It further moderates the impact of singular factors by averaging data over thirteen years and six years respectively. The results provide a trend, which reflects along(13-year)and a short (6-year)base from which to extrapolate. Two methods of estimating the number of kindergarten students have been used. The first uses the average increase or decrease over the past 13 and 6-year time frame and adds it to each succeeding year. The second derives what the average percentage Auburn kindergartners have been of live births in King County for the past 5 years and uses this to project the subsequent four years. The degree to which the actuals deviate from the projections can only be measured after the fact. This deviation provides a point of departure to evaluate the effectiveness of the assumptions and logic being used to calculate future projections. Monitoring deviation is critical to the viability and credibility of the projections derived by these techniques. Tables Table I'_ Thirleen Year History ,, O(!IgLmt 1�fnL�rrenl,I—page 3 The data shown in this table is the baseline information used to project future enrollment. This data shows the past record of enrollment in the district on October 1 of each year. Table 2 ,Historical O actors Used in/'rauKc Line,-page 4 This table shows the three basic factors derived from the data in Table 1. These factors have been used in the subsequent projections. The three factors are: • Factor I —Average Pupil Change Between Grade Levels This factor is sometimes referred to as the"holding power"or"cohort survival." It is a measure of the number of pupils gained or lost as they move from one grade level to the next. • Factor 2—Average Pupil Change by Grade Level This factor is the average change at each grade level over the 13 or 6-year period. • Factor 3—Auburn School District Kindergarten Enrollment as a Function of King County Live Births. This factor calculates what percent each kindergarten class was of the King County live births in the five previous years. From this information has been extrapolated the kindergarten pupils expected for the next four years. I j Table 3 PM)jecliein Models—pages 5-13 This set of tables utilizes the above mentioned variables and generates several projections. The models are explained briefly below. ❑ Table 3.13 (pg 5)—shows a projection based on the 13-year average gain in kindergarten (Factor 2) and the 13-year average change between grade levels (Factor 1). The data is shown for the district as a whole. ❑ Table 3.6 (pg 5)—shows a projection using the same scheme as Table 3.13 except it shortens the historical data to only the most recent 6 years. ❑ Table 3.13A and 3.6A(pg 6)—uses the same factors above except Factor 3 is substituted for Factor 2. The kindergarten rates are derived from the King County live births instead of the average gain. ❑ Tables 3E.13, 3E.6, 3E.13A,3E.6A(pg 7)—breaks out the K-5 grades from the district projection. Summary level data is provided for percentage gain and pupil gain by grade articulation. ❑ Tables 3MS.13, 3MS.6, 3MS.13A, 3MS.6A(pg 8)—breaks out the 6-8 grades from the district projection. Summary level data is provided for percentage gain and pupil gain by grade articulation. ❑ Tables 3SH.13, 3SH.6, 3SH.13A, 3SH.6A(pg 9)—breaks out the 9-12 grades from the district projection. Summary level data is provided for percentage gain and pupil gain by grade articulation. ❑ Table 4 (pg 10)—Collects the four projection models by grade group for ease of comparison. ❑ Table 5 (pgs 11-13)—shows how well each projection model performed when compared with actual enrollments. Data is provided in both number and percent formats for the past 13 years. Summary This year is the sixth consecutive year of an increase in enrollment after three consecutive years of declining enrollment. The increase of 580 students changes our historical average gain/loss in students. Over the past 6 years the average gain is now 2.37%annually, which equates to an average annual gain of 360 students. Using the cohort survival models,the data below is a summary of the range of variation between the four models. This data can be used for planning for future needs of the district. The models show changes in the next six years: • Elementary level show increases ranging from 833 to 1,168. (page 7) • Middle School level show increases ranging from 542 to 706. (page 8) • High School level show increases ranging from 855 to 1,094. (page 9) The models show these changes looking forward thirteen years: • Elementary level show increases ranging from 1,904 to 2,537. (page 7) • Middle School level show increases ranging from 1,110 to 1,444. (page 8) • High School level show increases ranging from 1,485 to 1,995. (page 9) This data does not factor new developments that are currently under construction or in the planning stages. 2 M m m w (D N W rn rn r V M W O rn rn N a � rn N N N 7 7 r N N N Cao N � O m N rn lD m 0 W N M N � CO'1 N N O N r O IND � N V M N N O r N 1] W rn rn N O N N rn N m N r o (O a W 0 O ID O N W ID V N M p rn r W M r r rn M N ID N N N rn V V W N cN+1 N 7 m r 0 � M M r N M (D r M N M V M � m N N rn N ID [D N Ol a0..�fJ..rn M o �� N r O rn N N rn W M Z M Ol M N N N rn W r (O N N V rn ` M N N N W M = � r 0 O V N N � � O O O N = N M uj O N �p r N T@ MC W M N IND M N M M V M O O N V lD M ifl [D N Ip rn rn 0 ^ r o �, O a M O N K r N V W r N M r W N N N r r r � lfl N V rn r r W 0 W M M N N 7 O V - - - - - - - - - - - - O C1 - O O O - - N N N N r Ir M (WD Wr N m (r0 m N m V Ir�l a c C7 ZW rn M W O (D r 0 W V ON1 o C C ...,...'',W O M O M N V M M M M w rn N N M I� V W O r ID O V N C7 '�O O N V m N O R V O O m tr0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - M N rco M ID N M N M V M O m N F oLLI n ❑ � olD coMvrn � oN � NNam \ �, o M o m _oNWw m_ Nm o (D N r V ID N M V V M N O O O O O O O O O N N N M M V O O ON N O - N N r M O N E OFJO dC rn MN rnV rnW V rn (D V N (D O N M0�Vl..�Wo p•�y,.UmT7 �K aal COUY N MM MID rnr M iD N mM Nm oM VN O N pl m al M N D rn N N N rn D O M rn NNmCO — O NM ❑ W - - - - - 0 M r W v r 0 N N O N rn M Yn W M rn rn m O Ol O = N M V r .S rn O N O N N N - M NO Z O C _� �.._� .- .- O 0 rn M N r M ID w M N M O ill V p G (D rn r r W r r M r W N M a C C tp M O N rn N r O O M M N N N i11 N m al O: N V V 0 V m W W N ON W m 0 n m O 0 M 0 0 0 0 0 M M M N 0 �T U' � O O O o N M rn O O O V Q L M N r M u� N M N N iD M 0 4�rntl N� C" m M rn V M ONE) V aND V (rnD y Iprn 0000Q1O00M V N M O O, Arno o 00 - O V N W ow C O Ip O N M W ONO �.N 9l r N N fD MN V N M Y l6 m m m O m 0 0 0 M M 0 0 C O W m W ONl m m N N n O m L p C O O F m c r W N `o 0 s W ❑ (� J N m w m w w m W rnNN J Q ❑ r N M N Ip r 0p O1 O ' N Q c c W O n Q d' Y � O c°1iv GO H ~ ain < d a Z H LLON a a a�+ w R QKQ a° � � TQV LL U ¢ m 2 W Q W o , o , e O 7 a � `OmNmm Dove °im �"p v°i n mN $ mp � rP- mmaacmiarooinn p Z Z M1 m N M m M N N M m 10 0+ t0 6> m n n O N N M Q N P M P 0 O OJ O O J N O LL O m v v p E Q mm0 m cc Li r m ¢ w ¢ Q N t2 'a v v J S � 2 O d W J c a N Cl N O 0, h m OI O O n Q M m P O+ N m N N N M tp m N O O m N N m n N O O In C J W 0© M N fp n b O N M N M m h Ip p p O N Ol N Q Ol Oi M N OI f0 M !n M f0 N M O +O O U O z � W x (/) ZW VJ MNNhN MM IN ON OP 0. 0) O O) Or O V a W (] ,' {- h W N m m N m m m O M Or M O n m O O M O m N n h h m O f0 N m W 0 N P m -� w W O O 4 4 4 4 m N m om, m m m m 4 4 4 4 Y 4 9 4 4 4 Y a6 6 " ' - - NNN N ❑ O K N w 10 P. m 01 O N M N 10 F m m O N M Q N n W T O v- N M S N N h W m O N O Z � m W m (O m Ol W m m m m m m m OI O O N 1p U m p m m m m m m m m m m m m m o 0 0 0 0 $ $ $ $ $ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o d o yy - v- N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N H ' Z O O O Oi ul _ ... 00 y O N O mm p p M m O M M +O m h N m m O M M n pp N m h N M M O M M M N M M V Q In0 _m N N h (O 10 f0 10 (O h n m m n Ip n m m � n n n M1 h n h n n W m m m m m m m m m m J O Q [] N o D N m N N M M Ot M n m O N m 0 N Q O+ O M M N M O m h O y y@N S O O Q N Q m O O N N M O h m m n m M O n O+ n N V N m O Of z U ��+nr r O N Q I() M 0 M N O O m M m 10 m Co P m M W N N p N (O h h t7 Q m m m T CJ W m t� � � � � � � � � � � nnIXiP d cmP' Pa 6a 6av � �n +timmm16m mem mr: �$ F ° $ m E3 O ul m m N h P+ m O N n n O M O O i0 N N O Q h m_ Q m m N O O N m O O+ P O W - r m rm m w - 0+ N N �p N N N N N N N N N N N N N m - N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N F m O Z a OI N M y N IC n f0 m O N M V N IO n m T O N M O N 1p M1 tp p1 O N M Q N 10 Z, h $ m m m fD m m m m m m OI m m m 01 m m Ol Of O O O O O O O O - - - - - N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N J O O 2 U y Z WO 0 0 0 CJ W M o O o D D D o OO j O V N ON N F P N N m N O N N P m V N m N m N N O O 0 p� m N n N v.. M n Q mN N m M h N I� C'! m O) M r C) P' h 0 M N h v m N M M N M -- O O m ^ J N N Qm •- •- ZE y N S W 0 N O 0 0 O .W R O O COI R N C ? ry O N = 4 mN...,O NmIX)Nmm � + NN 9 Ommh00NMMW Nmm 'p ry O W O arr NN J p � � � np+ rp+ ✓ D N S � O � r- N M Q N (� n m�., ,,,, N h a Y Ue Lp OOO OOO O,O � UNLL ' ]C OrO � N u4Ff IL N EO ' Y e• N M V N (0 n m pI O't� W LL a O p o o m r m m o m a m G a' N O p K M in m m m - m h m - r m W m m W a' n m M1 ` ! r r m - m m m ` - rn N aN � � � � � m yN � � � � - �a � Q W o O f� K ry '^ m m m m m m m m r h r h o o M Od N � � - - - - - �- �- - N - - - - - tN N a N a O N Q Ip 1(Wl N 1(l Q ON m O M Q T O m a m O.N 0 m N � m m N m r tT N O Q d' N m ! m N 0 m m N N m m Vl m A. m tY ry 10 m 10 1D m W (O m W r ! ' ^ (V m O y N O m d N - - N P N m r m ID n N m O O O tp a s ((pp N'.r P W W m m W O YI m N m N o Z O K N m N P Q P W IO V1 VI W n Q' N N m m m m m N N - M1 M1 m m m W a N � N � � � � � � � � � � - � � m r w ^ n W wry .- mom W mQQ mamNNe � rva rm � ohmN Amato tpo O IL Zn m m N v) WO to m m m n r QQ ' Mm om Mm m p'o o ,a N N m f h - M m m m - - N a .- - - .- J r n N Q - - - - - m Ci Q Q O m R' N a a a a Q a a Q Q m m m m �. 4]. a� � � � - N d N � �- N Q U ' tM`,tmm mmmP Nm 000mN °"' � M � Q � Nm o . . m r m � moP' � R O N W o o m W m m m m m o N tWy m O N N m m m m o n a m m m o v o Qd N - - - - - N Q J 20 O � mm m � i: m � mmmomm om 0.... m 0 -! N 4 0 '! N m Q m m m N O M O N N M U N N O a N N O r M1 O W N M m W W M M M M W M P P M •- ,- n O 0 m m N a P r t0 O W P Ol µ7 W N O p N W m OI r a m m N a N r h W N O m - N M M M M ! m K N m m - - ` ` (� - p p - m t W m Q O O m Q' Wmmmm mm mm � mMf7 l7mWMMMNMMN M.Q. O d ry er ^ ` f ` ` - - - ' - �Z p h Z T m 2 H O ep m o rn n vmi vo m N M m m or o n 2 « O m ry m ai io v iv vri m m v m N m �2 t2 C N m m N N- W d H W S d H - P. N KT P c c O a c c f c < m N W m W r M m o W W H c m N W m W r P M m o m m U O � '...V N M M N N " N M N a �' D F d 00 N �2 M M N N N M N Q 0 D o m a m o m a N m m mQ O N m Q in m n m rn a m M Q O N M a �n to M1 m m F r M O ',y OF r U Y O i 06 j voo m umi m ",K 0 0 O m m m m umi v O m m <o rn N O N r a m 1p L(] O O N r P n m O V O O m n n m 'O m m m m n a m O N N W W Z O N . . O V m O m m m m m O 0' N n r a ry f U W -! N p1 m m O i0 a m N.....'. M N Q Q m O Q m P m 0 O Ip OI n m . O m ry O b ilI {n N r W m W M O � N M M Ix d N d N a F m m Z r+ m m m a rn a m m m D ry N m ry M o rn m m rn O r r m r N r M r rn O N M N a m o m o CW .2 �2 �2 �2 .m- m c a N a N J O N m M M O p O� O N m m r VI Z LU F n m N r m M N N m o m r M m m m m a p m Ovn mmam rnmin m � mm OM mnm � PMOi� ry � m 7 K N M M M M M M M m co U M n F' M Ca] (n C2 J O N N O nl N N N m Q (n Ip a y m O Ip Vl N p� 0 N m m N m m N 0 M O N N la e O m N O O r m m m r M r N p M O m O M m O Q N N M M �M M M M M V ; M CI � � � � N m O O n M r a m M O m Q y drd N m a OI M M fp a OI N a a N n v 7 O p a m Ol a Q n m O 41 a O) {ry m O O p a OI O n Q m OI ry Q N n r O n O y N O M m N m r a W a m r a N a O O W CJ m m a m m O m m m n m N {Yj a zO NdI ' Omr � rNO 0 N O U W' N C2 N N M l2 N N N f2 0 C C O C C F c m N m m T n a M m O m m m f U o 7 m r in N N m o rn m m o a yNj. o U_�/ o O r n m m m m umi o a O1 o c K C U O N em- em- Q iA pC v 1L ~ r N f M N ! M a 1fM CW W m N Q N N a N U a a a W Q W J W W 0 n m vo Tm M p1 M cmv T W T m T � T fN0 m m fR O o rn " 0 0 o m °',,,,,N 1 O N N N N O O O O A O m m m m n n n m M m Ol m OONm m . n m W M M m M N m N m N a' N m m m m m a N � � N Ory mminmip Op O . O m M Nm f[ N vo vo m vp m m m o m K N K ry O U)O O� Nm Nmmm rvN mm m1Dmmmmm rD.,. mm Ma' NN n Z O p OK N a - - - � - - O - ' I N T f W O ` O7 N OM mO O ON ry Qm N m N N m Q OI a N W K ry Q a z M N N W N m f0 M N N O) Q N m W V + I N m m M N N v) O Hm m m n n .7 �+ mm O N vm Q Q nyv m O N n n C) N W K N Q Q a Q Q m M1 a N N N � m � a o ON O O n Of O N e` e N I,m m N m N O1 [ M N pf m O V (O N Q N Q O pl M C N Q N f W ! N O N m K a M m m O a 1W+1 f V Z K N Y Q c ` a Q n r m h w aN � � m � aN,,,,.- m � aN ary ; z n z LU O N Q m Q m o m a O n r M m m M M m bm ry M N r m M m O M M N N N Q N M �y m W W W W W W wv m O �y M M O m O M m M1 m H aH � � m aN � � m ,i,u � aN •- � ary •- O U M M M M N Q m (O O O r N Q O N Q Y- O ry W o o m m m m m m O N N m v� vv m uv m',m M1 O ry N m m O ry N Q m r m N M M M � Di 4 J = C O N N d N �q N O 0 N m Q O M Q W m \ N m O M W m O `4e Y N N N N W Q M Q o ` LJ O N m O m m m O n Ol 2 O w m m r n m N m O m N N o m m r O m moon m o Q U H M m M W N M N N n ry M a a Q a Q ', m M a' H N N m m m m m o m Y w N, a N N N a N - - - - - - n ,o a N - - - - m N m m m n m r n \ IV m m M M M \O oN Ip o o n M r o M oN i0 m m mmn MQ W. \ o M1 m S K N M m m ' �M ol N N f0 W m n N N Y M N m M N f0 m M ''� I N Q W . m n . . o O m M N m r m ry m m O m N m Q m v Q '.0 O m m m N m r M m O m M m Q m m N a' CI Cl C1 M N W m N m C a M M M (7 f7 M o m m o w N N M m N m m N om N N m M m m Q� r a 'o m p a S �'r o ° a o - - - - - - n o m a N 9 N c N L N m m m m m f0 � . M1Wom olmo = O NnmOmo � o m � O �p m o ni s m m m m m O m' N I m-N m m N r a m O m N o m r m m W N m O y ry ry m vmi <o ii v N a0 " N M M ^ n N z a N p O a N O F O F C C F O C V C C f C C W J m Od [7O m C7 -Wi J m Cow J m t7 (7 a Q m N W m m m W I'.,.Q f N m O n Q y3 m O t pJ ri m rnd N mN rnN mm m d " f M M N Q n d a f N N N M N n "Q `OOQ o r U o N N ¢f ] N N N d V d W 'G" CCa y Y d uJ d r� Y Y M ' Q W W O to W O w w ~O W W O W a ❑ N M O N N WI,,. Q Q ',,,,,,..p N M Q m K O Y N O Y vt O y 4 0 Y I m a `m %o i.v Tm i.m yN dm y N y m m W m m O Open nNmi mm Op Oo N N N N O O O O r O . \ 0 � � 0 0 0 O N � rv � N a ry a ry N d0 N O m Vl 7 N N m n N IWVry n Q N n Q p O 0 m N o a n O m a m m m O d N m �n u� n r K rvn i� m m o m K ry o v d' ry a v O N Z O O O N O O P o 7 ry OI O N P o C) N n m N n \ O 0 N M n C] M \ r m m m m Q n n r W n M � m O e m �i la n O v v m vo m O m,'L.m m rn umi m nm ¢cur KrvQ � Q ^'+ n r d' ry m mm � m KN'.mm W n � KrvPQ PM m � ce a ZO O LL mm Q N6i Wm oo O Nm NN mP O mn oo m M N P P K ry P Q m M P J � N W M W m \ � N N N Vl W \ 0 N p M m Q o 0 N O N m n o Z K ''.O v m m m N v p Q m m m N m O K N Q a P P N M K ry m c m in K v a Q M v� n W f ON M N N m o N p� m m O o 0 N m N N m o O M rn m m N m m O M P M o m W m O N m W m N m m O M,iP M o m m M 7 a ry m m m Q d' N Q Q Q N Q m K ry m m m Q K N o a Q N Q �a Sao aoll� � P � N N N N N U_ 0 N O Od N 0 0 ryN \ 0 0 NNN m ^ Q \M � O N d d0 NNN'ImOQ mnm nPP nNN iOo Qy J O I N m V P P a 0 2 O mmmmm O IQNivm � P. O � mmmmm O QNnm � Q ry M Q P m n Z ,Q m m b o 7 tV m Q m T o l N P m m m 0 IV m Q m ql \ 7 O p',.n m o P O n O p m m N o r m ''.O p r� m o Q o n O m m p m rn N o m K ry',m M m o m N m m m m n '.,.C N `n in m o M m a ry,.,..� P a p m N m m M Ol \ m 2 N O W@ e Z O Q m Q n o Q Z O O O Q m Q n o Q Z O o O 10 C W N N W n n O1 m o m N K m m N m m o U ry U N U M N U Y N w N 0 O N N N omr n N a L � ry N N m Q p a y N N.n M a N N ' N. V 0 m 0 r m 7 m l m n n o Q 0 o m a �,o 0 d' m m N K m m P N m m m N O m N o m a m 0 m P N n m a a 2 K �I�• o J d ni J S d 0 J J p O a O q O O O ) C C O d C C O L C C IO t G L N S 'S m N U � m C7 C7 U m Jm C7O Om Jm' 20 'O t0 J m C7 (7 w OOrom mlm O WaJrornmm O wC ] ro �immO � W o � ri � m � � O � O W pw O W ❑w O m mn m W Q Q mn mm my Q mr mlm p7 � Q mr mm m m W a T ul T m T M T N W m n m Ooamv mIF aN 06Qom � N o' Ooo o m . . . Q 06mm � uO1i LOm 'qy N N N N M O O O n 0 OI \ 0 �? N W f7 W O \ m 0 OI m 10 0 OI m m m a O a m n m m m Pn N O N d M N m i(I O r o M N m N O Q m o N m m ul O Ol \ N n f7 O Q P O m Q Q o m Q O m r n rn in o o O O q 0 m a a o m N m LL O o m P Q W Z O n m m m n o m O n �n n N W l N m y m N m c O N O V m Q m 0 �p m m Ol M W m p� O Q a. r Z m m o m m 0 N P m m m Q 0 N W (O OI N \ N Q W (O W P N d) m 4l Ol N o 0 O � inom orn Nr Dhrmn mm a`i O mom om Nn W J J O 0 R� Oy — m W m OQr �n m Q �n OeuNimm � rn m OQ' non lin ' �n Z W d Z Q 7 N W W m l N Q m (O O o\ O N O 10 0 O fj m n IO m O 0'' O rj N N E m N O m M m n W m W O O O r d O m m Q (O C'1 N a O W m VI i0 m N a O m m Q QMN N f U O N O O m N o N �(] m O Q o 1 ry O O T N ry Vl m O Q O 0 N OI i(l OI W m O N m W O N W V N Ol m N m (O m P m J 0 O M N m O m . O \ � N M O N N n \ � N W O W m 0 \ 2 O rMr om io O or ran io '� O O On nm W m V K N Q e m m N O N K fV m Q N M N a' N Q Q m M O N K N N P P V m M N N K N Ol f0 OI V m o M N N Q P N N o M N O� N m Q m \ 7 N N Q P N N m � NPmmNQVM Oa' No O f i Oa' oN NQ rm n m o C1W n Q O Q I O m.W n Q N N M n O rn m r m v m M O qm m P N N Ol N (y :m m M v N M n N M v o m 2 a N,,� in N O W «�O �a O m _ nv uWN M mm rnm rnr �mn NoN rcoo_i v` flf.D °mH� O-d+ o' r nm mm nQ nm o cc N J o c d ry 0 L O m m O Y '� 'F O t' -co w T -� m C7 C7 VVG m W C7 0 O m JJ m 0 U' d M m C7 C7 = o m o m rn m Il" c m a m m W O Q V N q IM1 a m� o4w O m� �o Qo O m� w 0 m� u qqw O Q W K m C ' gi I O_ N Q N O ornm O orvm O ornN O o m1,2 O oovoi K m m m K M a m K m m O IY M r N m m a m G o m m d O d m 11 O l0 r (O f0 Q O N N N N N N N O O O O O o 4' N m OM] Y N e o M m C ry m o O N N N N a N N N m m m m m a n � m NI� N mo " I� � ov°'im O m' mm U d N d N r m d N d d Il N N m N N d N N N O m m m m m r m Z O nm m O o O m n rn o O n o o a m µ 0 d o r m a add a s li o m m m m 0. No N N LU U r r r r r -1 O �'.m udi O � �' O � mm umi � I O � NmcNm O err a o m a Orr a odd v di a ommmm m o a N N N N 0. f f0 m m m m m N Z O N m N O W J N N N N a tOY O m m m m mom � D N O m N N Of N O1 m P r N O m O m N ^ )p p d m O y m m D Z 0_' N d d r z w d d d d m M N d r N d m m o m o N O o N m m 0 a � N N v v w N M v NNN N n Oa' H a o m a o N N N N N N F U H O H W N O �, o mo O O N N r N O N m O m 0 0 0 a o m a or a o a o m m m J O N N N N M N N O r O 1� N N r O m m m m . O o m m iK N M N d' N 0 O m 0 K N O O K N f0 m f0 m ''.. Y N U i2 O r r d O eU r fO eD d O Q P Q Q d O i[I Vl m m m m I� pj y N N N N a ON Z N m p) m m N O d r O N U'] Of 1l1 m N m N m N N M r M1 O O O' m m O O N Omi tN+i m ll N 0 � 0 R' N d m Q m x a 0 0 0 0 o m m n rn N m d d N O m N i(1 N IO m mO) O) N m OI N (p m N W O N m O m i(I m m m O m r N r N O p) N d N P 0 N IY ems') m N K m r m K m m m m K M d m P K Z 11 N - d N 10 f0 (O 10 d N m m m m d N m LA N m ',d O r r n r O N Q O m m m N N '.0 m n m m O m' o om aom 0 m,,o o N N D m m r x �'.N N N N x O.I.N m N V1 a p f0 f0 m fp O 0 Z 0 , W V p Q d d d d Q d d d d Q m m m m a ry N N N r m m fD m ! m m V1 m ` N N 5 F- N N N N d d d d N N In IA N N N N � U O V O 00 m m U O m m m m < O N i(I V1 m iU O m m' O Q N Q N Q N 6 N N Q J a m F O 7 � m pWp d D I W W Q paW � U ~ � m b LL' m m K W o wo 0 � «[ N 41 VI M y do m W. W. W. ui ff ff '6 w m5 9 r 9 r x 0 r 13 fpO o Lftm - n O X �J: 8. 'D In In �x 'o A 88 6 M 0 I z 9 71 1-1 13 9 r ',3 9 mo01XI 14, E2 0 co LU < V-7 �—i i1c, uP l z 61 ll� 1x9 w yy 0 C cl� (Y. 7 0 r X 9 9 r x ixoN a F IF S z 0 0 LLI ........ ...... z LU F- ILI ll� I, v11 x n4 '3 0, T 02 0 > m 0 - V N 9 x 0 �i 5 < < 9v i3 xx V X 0 C X 1� ID 11 X U) z w a. M. < �2 �2 �2 �2 z 0 < 0 x X Cl I" M 0 9 r x 9 r Z 9 F, 0 Io 9 0 E n. 11 V't It 0 z 0 aP 8P Ul CD X nri a xx P 02 'q ran m, z T, Sao ma ci x I I 1,, 0 a x �N x i5 C3 x x 11 "1 "1 X x "I XX .1 9 x Irl "I ID XX F o N (n z Y y m XX 0 x x Iql, fB LLJ <1 0 N N N N 0 0 Or a v LU OX p 0 0 c < x �r x x z < x I LU z LU N CI Dm m m M 0 v 0: A X < < X. x 0 0 z of �j D , � . y 0 0 1 N 1 2 2 0 z I co < 0 N 0 D ;a o u 0 0 < 0 15 x lE < 2— 0 m 00 X x ci 00 x S.2 E x . .... X X w x U 0 z 0 LLLLQ 0 QN M 0 00 0 < m m U i na o D u O V L d O (T j m C N CO E d V O j oin o E `o r � S Y Q C x g ca Y@ sW rs cv o a co 0 r 7 eY} i.') vk "d' > GY r.� > C4 cry C•I > a' d a d N W' A tC ,• N'.0 %x (V u"3 fv Y) '.0 %% (G' 0 CS' �` a O N C'r tuyV N d ❑ % C% W qY.t' d ❑ % N v7 N V, M N U! a d O � w O @b N a m v w F N r C w Q' a m i m v V V O 5 o m y C C d Y Y W p p O p D, % fC N m �3'1 J �Q A N N J m S m S X. % Sao m Z "' W "' W ❑ % ❑ % ❑ x ❑ x W y y y y o 0 o O f m O N N N N n r zLU Q , OJ M Cj t+1 O � M M O M M N M N O N ro OY d0 Cf D 1R1 v� �D m P N F U K •„ c aee e x u "a .r N (A 4}Y 6 o, J c _ K 4 U d d y ❑ % '�r a 2 x+ ❑ % O X '� m O A aJ N N N > > N N N M O O N Z O d O O jy N � O :�•�• O Y I� b OI V m 4 � N r- 4!Y r » � Oi (V m Q a O f A A A l9 IO f M m M M M F' VI V V a a F N » M} I!Y VI a Z a C J > y > > N N a 0 � �� 'uv n m or 171 r 'I r q;. r 1a r 111 l 2 K a s M y Cl r iv an rJ a era M r5 ai ro 0 OU' o E Z m c ❑ % m n: a> r- ❑ ^'. Ic ❑ .- cO % cv cn _. .. .... U O p N N N N ,'• .' w � y Ip 101 N M � P CI O C1 N M iO m �O 10 (O O V m O n ilO f0 00 II II H A iL LO 10 (D f M M M M M f ? d' V V O F H ❑ � ID a a as ¢ aaali ¢ a` a` a` a` +qa a a` a Appendix A.2 - CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Enrollment Projections o o m ? O O O O V r M V p C N O N V V � LL 0 0 0 O N LL � LL A C W O cN0 W M tNh M y u c F W LL N O L U 9 01 OD N 00 O 0 O N V m W R c o 0 0o N o v o 0 0 0 0 0 o N v o o r o o^o C N A N W U) H N N O NQ O N N M N N OD O O O 00 O O O O Q N N p N j N a N C O y a ... r O U C O N N: N 'O Y A Y O N N O N N N N O O W N M N N N N O ry m M 0 y y N p m a 3 aD n a N O p 0 0 O m r 0 U1 N OJ M N m M M H w o y p (a N « O G O m (D O M r M M V N N N M M � � m V �(] m m W 641 M O O U y C N NO o ? o a m J a G « t a O m 0 v u> 0 m m (p N O N 00 00 " <O N r � N r r � � r N, N V N N OJ m OO M V O OJ M V O N - x E O N F <D m Y a. Y ro W d a ° e O aGi d E E E m m. Q a O U Q d m a m G G Q C Y CA N W a m �. c E ca �' F m rs.,.a .`� 'c o..'a .`� F ,m O CD C7 x y o ; v E a a a m a N a D a b CL 7 N fn LL y Q. d a S A C1 l7. a s m CX. d a � R p L of m m m C 0 Q O m m m m o 2^ o 0 0 2"�o �"' o o m. h E U. J m j Y m o 'gyp « 0 m --:` CI. �' t t of > U S m .. b5A` d N CC al0 ' N = ON UNm _9r vJ p = 0 y �j M N = _ 0M iCE w N w Wn —� n m m a Eu 2 w LO a CL d L) Z mm Y Q 2 m C y d Q y b N N J v LU y0) l2ti $ i I N O N N N O ry M V V V N d) D) D) U] O V W W W O � o N ry o No... O r U N � p ''.Ol Ol Ol m c0 W O O O O O M O Q O) O OOi O N M M M M M M M M M V V V N M IV I— — — � Ian C - � N O N n A NN M M M N N N N N M M M V d M O M O) (V fV O O N m ❑ O O N �� — — 06 N a O M Vi N N a m v C^i of N a p N N N M N N D O.p..—... Q N A DJ A 000 10 �O N N V O 00 n — N N N r n r — P rr co r ao o p p - - - - - - - - — V J D_ d a21 ' O C OL __. ...... ..... . ..,_. N W ..... ........ _ � '' 9 f0 = OJ O n o0 f0 Ol N N O n �O V = d M W 0) M CO O (O n 0 OJ V O m d 3 Ur j O N N N - N N N M Z N O - - '-'...— O O O O N N — O W m Z .0 Q w Q � � G O W _...y W N y co Q ❑ N M V �O (O n O� 01 O in t"i f` Q N M V N t0 r N Q7 O i a N a r r r r r r r a N � op N r 0 7 O cp fp Ol O op M N N <p M e ry U O T O O M M N N A M i11 � M M O N � y 0 O O r r r r r r M r r r � r r r r fp N N d ' rp a M a N � N N O O V �[1 V O V 00 r 0 f0 01 N o N C O W M N (O V M 00 M r N 0 V M M O e N N N d ry d M a M a NO O r r r r r r CO r r r r r r ',,7 r nj p O r r r r r r r r r r r r r fD r [V 00 O N N a N a d r O V V V V V V N M V V N V V V V 1� O N N V V V V V V r M V V M Ifs Y] O N O h Q NOO r r r r r r CO r r r 'V r r r V r N O O r r r r r r W r r r r r r r fp r Nj N No N d C O a � MINMV N (p M o O V ^ M M DJ [O N Q1 O m l(1 N m 0 OJ N V M U M N M M CO I� N M M r {p r r M M m IL InO O r r r r r r O r r r r r r r N r m c a a m � � °' M rr c aru� mmminv M mMM o �; � M � rammu� �n to M u� m �n N (D <om o � O o o O O V N O NO n r (O M M W ^ MO O M - M - - � N a ,,., r r r r N a r r r W r r r o M a M a N N M OJ N M M N M Cp'1 Q�i N N N r M ry r N ONi N m 6 M M N M M O N N N M M M M M V N Q p O r r r r r r r r r r M r r r M r h'... O r r r r r r op r r r M r r r r r M 0 W W N O r [6 r f0 N N M M Ul r V M V CO O O� M N N m ♦ � O r lO N N a0 M M � f� V M V N O Ol O] (O � o� } c] E N U N N N M M N ^ N M 3 - � a r r r r r r r f CL C a ro u e o O N Q m N O M W op .O a a� O r N M V N Y (O 1� W M o r H .O a,,,,'.,d' Y r N M O N Y tp I� CO Cp�7 M d' F- a jL a' o a° r a' a - °at N > j N In O N H > j G1 N w 0 O N V J C m L T V J O N 9 N 0 T 1 A y C G N o -0 E `O d A y G C OJ c B E O ow wooer 3c7 c10iw m000 2 a p y i, E N ) >. N N rn N Z a O h ], E N N N y N w y Nym o' > ' NO c yTj [0 yJ —O -J O 0 ' mov o o — o coZ a ao 0 Z a4 m m Y U E 4wG Ol Y a U i N a N a l U O� T O W 7 M 0 W 7 M N r N U N M 7 fp O Q� u] 7 c0 W r r tD p 0 N a N a' M a M a N U M r M M M 7 61 7 M 7 N <O LL] 7 7 ry N M M 7 7 N 7 7 7 M (2 �2 �[1 2 M'. p O r r r r (p � r � 7 r � � � (O O O r r r r r r 7 r r r 00 N d N O Q NO O M M M M M M M r N O O r r r N N a r r r r r r r r N a C O _ U N I!') m m O 0..,,,0 O 7 Ol 7 m r W f� N r o M OJ O r W N O N W N 4l 7 Ul fp N U1 p' U W r N N OD i[1 UJ O M iA U] M CO M N M O� q U �.N M M M M M 0 7 M 7 7 M M (O i.� h 'p N N M M 7 7 M 7 7 M N 7 7 7 7 f� r n 2 p O r r �- r r r p'J r r 7'',r r r �O',,r N O O r � � � � � 00 � .- r 7 r r r r y'� 2 m,...0 d N a N a C N E N « O V V r N M M Op V m D 7 0 6 r 7 of M O M M N O D N V p r N N M M M M B M 7 2 M M V M N 0 7 M 7 0 p -o w r r r r r r r r r r r r r r a` N a w w m rn 0 >_ rM c2 N N �.N o 'a r� U N m cN+l N M M 6Mi N N N M M M M.m p o Q � p O r r r r r r r r r r M r r r r r N d N a 0 J N N N � � 1p O r Q] O N r U'.N { T M M N r N r r �U N N M U m J N r U N N N M M c O Q r r M N r 0 _ p Q r r r r r r r r r M r r r r r .J 'Q N p ti J 'C i.N p� m W _ o v.......w IL 5+ Q❑ c7 m ; ;; ❑ 0 my = 'O 2 0 r N M 7 N �D r O CL O aJ D o j ~ a N � m , O G aL a O G 'Oo � G d 0 N N N 0 a) O L T y i 0 N N N mw D W n O 'D d J O 'G.. �p a d C CO a" 2 c c m 0 o ° Ea o a � U) 0 a) o Eo 0 mal0 ryo c � d � a) dToEmo � a a m co n U H y y > OI N Z U h ' in ] r N N N D Jm N a o ° J 0 d o'> g ' >oaa 00p mo t 0 O Za oz 0 o2 Z0 o y Enarn Ye do Eoma) Yn 0 42w � Appendix A.3 Student Generation Survey O m r N N N f0 QD O V �LJ N O O N W �0 a0 ap M �0 (0 N O O O i0 tD O i0 01 UI I, O Q. N V I� M (0 �0 V N N o0 1� O V p H O O O O O O O O O O O O N O O p V M r ILL N m C1 N N C� f!7 0 N O 0 N N O O O O N N CO = O''.. O O O O O O O O O O O O O O � t N N O f0 N O t0 O 0 N lh T c0 Cl h O �0 h p C Q N N O O O O N N p O O O O O O O C 2 I� w V (aaD M 1(l m V O O W V 2 M E M T N M 0 N � tN N�! � � � t00 N M N �� O 0 d O O G O O O O O O O O O O O I W O r c M m Nm v ao a J Vl O'.... M N M N N O O N N �0 (0 N V Q E m O N N N V mDll O mV N N N m m W N 00 M C � W E O C C C N y N r N N _ S U h 0 O p N N 'C ,0 C N Y = N U Y in m y E m m m 0 m 0 °0 c m °� E 0 w OS E ¢ w ¢ J w w L O > U O O O l0 N O O O O M O O O O N O O 2 y wO N N y C 3 0 m . E a I n a O J 73 m o m r u Qomo ro OJ Ol N V O U3 (0 (O L0 l0 Y7 N C6 ,0 U N O N ` G a J � a u 0 W 0 M yj M - M N 00 w y = y C � A IL = a J U m 0 0 0 J N N N N N N N N N N N N N U Y � N N t0 N N �O E a !° r N N J Z 0 w � 3 a� w m 9 g d a- LLI.g N lai a m U C Y N C o aa, a W w = a > as > J > U w Ur d 'm m m o m m m m m m N Y N UI N Ul N II> Q Q g M 0 Y J J J J J 2 2 (n U7 fn (O TIT 1"To (O u'1 I- W � N M M V W o (a V N M iN p N p 0 a o d N N N r N r M N V CN N....,.r M. N N �' r iCID M � ID W 9 O = C M y O r r N r N N M U1 r r 0 N N 00 r r ON a N V M iM y 0 V r 'a � .. c m d W N W M N V N mm n M M N r N it iN M N N O H c v E 0 M a W U (� boo N ry N ❑ U C � O t a -c- O > N c Z d O7 773 a a � o y N Q d �] 0 O d mCLV ^ W O N O O V O O CO (O W O O. F U r r N N M IN r �, M � Q O u c CL'000 000000000000000 T U U G7 O C � N 00 C III. V �,,N N ON `O OIN It � 0o0 CO O (D co co O (.Oj r r M r o a N o m m m u N N 2 �2 U a LL C N m w E o O C m 0 l � a a d' 0 m N m CO U o Z d C W N m U -O V J a m N 'C T > w o w x > `o m m o a a E m _ O N N Y Y Y U = C m 'C m m m Q MMSS = JJJaa' > Q OK m N 1"010 jp O N W N N N O +' (D N uJ M 0 H Ua O V U. C fq p p it N C m y io y O r O V vY1 U VL'i d C � A OCI E (0 M o m E r y W o 0 0 o N w 0 A 0 O v N N N to Y al O) co N O N ID w Q N V r Go j0 r N N CD Y U Q E u� u'1 V M E w r � `l � 0 M c ++ � W W N N L C Y = N C � v a) E.� � E as m m LL (D O a W w' L > N u) Z C d m c m c �p a I n v O 7 0 0 o N r> O 0 Q o y H v] F v O O 3 N m p Y > y U o m c C c C N a7 > > x Q U v U v n O O N _ N o d D j b N N N OI m v IL a L a � U O w A V V D O N U N N U v N N E ja o G c Q1 Q p w N ~ o0 E 2 Y E O J c C N c E oQ= 3Q m o Q a LL a> o s a U LL v v m = c N v N H (D m acir �' — m m J a ZE > oo -o �e O E .Fu a) P c rL J a- 1 N (n HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 401 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2018-2023 HIGHLINE PUBLIC SC HOOLS Board Introduction: June 27, 2018 Adoption: July 18, 2018 HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT N4. 401 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2018-2023 HILI PUBLIC SC HOOLS BOARD OF DIRECTORS Joe Van, President Bernie Dorsey, Vice President Angelica Alvarez Fa'izah Bradford Tyrone Curry, Sr. SUPERINTENDENT Dr. Susan Enfield Table of Contents Page Introduction ...... , ....... ........................ ......,......... Educational Program Standard ..................................... ................. ,....... ...............3 CapitalFacilities Inventory..............................................................................................................5 Student Enrollment Trends and Projections .......................................................... .........................9 Capital Facilities Projections for Future Needs ........................................................--.................10 FinancingPlan ..................................................................................................................-...........12 SchoolImpact Fees........................................................................................................................13 Appendix A: District Map ......................................... ........ A-1 Appendix B: Population and Enrollment Data ............................................................................B-1 Appendix C: School Impact Fee Calculations .....................................„......,.......----...,...........,.C-1 Appendix D: Student Generation Rates ....................................................................................- D-1 For information regarding the Highline School District's 2018-2023 Capital Facilities Plan, contact Rodney Shaffer,Interim Executive Director, Capital Planning and Construction, Highline School District No. 401, 17810 8"'Avenue South, Building A, Burien, Washington 98148. Telephone: (206)631-7500 I I SECTION ONE: INTRODUCTION Purpose of the Capital Facilities Plan This Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan has been prepared by the Highline School District (the "District") as the District's primary facility planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act (the "GMA") and King County Council Code Title 21A. The Plan was prepared using data available in May 2018. The GMA outlines 13 broad goals including adequate provision of necessary public facilities and services. Schools are among these necessary facilities and services. School districts have adopted capital facilities plans to satisfy the requirements of RCW 36.70A.070 and to identify additional school facilities necessary to meet the educational needs of the growing student populations anticipated in their districts. The Highline School District(the"District")has prepared this Capital Facilities Plan (the"CFP") to provide King County (the "County") and the cities of Burien, Des Moines, Kent, Normandy Park, SeaTac, and Tukwila with a schedule and financing program for capital improvements over the next six years (2018-2023). This Plan will be updated annually with any changes to the impact fee schedule adjusted accordingly. Executive Summary After a period of low enrollment growth,the District has experienced steady enrollment increases since 2010 and projects continued enrollment increases following a slight dip in 2017. The District currently serves an approximate student population of 18,983 (October 1, 2017 enrollment) with 18 elementary schools (grades K-6), five middle level schools (grades 7-8), and five high schools (grades 9-12). In addition, the District has alternative programs: Big Picture (MS and HS) at the Manhattan site; CHOICE Academy (MS and HS) at the Woodside site; New Start (9-12) at the Salmon Creek Site; and Puget Sound Skills Center ("PSSC"). Over the last 14 years the District has embarked on a major capital improvement effort to enhance its facilities to meet current educational and life-safety standards. Since 2002 the District has passed three major capital bonds: one in 2002 for approximately $189,000,000, one in 2006 for approximately $148,000,000, and one in 2016 for approximately $299,850,000. The 2002 and 2006 bonds were used for replacement of existing facilities and not to accommodate increased enrollment. The 2016 bonds are earmarked for a combination of improvements to/replacement of existing facilities and the provision of new capacity. With the approved capital bond funds and reimbursements from the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction, the State of Washington, the Port of Seattle, the Federal Aviation Administration and private donations for a new Raisbeck Aviation High School, the District has designed, permitted and constructed 13 new elementary schools, 1 new high school, renovated 3 - I - schools as interim facilities, and renovated portions of Memorial Field and Camp Waskowitz. All of this work has been done since March 2002. The District's 2016 bond proposal was based on the recommendations of a Capital Facilities Advisory Committee ("CFAC"), a citizens' committee representing every part the District. The committee met for a year to study the District's facilities needs, review data, such as enrollment projections and building conditions, and analyze various solutions. CFAC developed a long- term facilities plan, which includes the 2016 bond as the first phase of a four-phase plan to meet students' needs over the next 20 years. As the District looks ahead it recognizes that anticipated enrollment growth, some of which will be caused by new development, and implementation of recent legislation will require the District either to add new facilities, add additions to existing facilities, renovate existing facilities, or add portables to existing facilities. This CFP identifies the current enrollment, the current capacity of each educational facility, the projected enrollment over the six-year planning period and how the District plans to accommodate this growth. It also includes a schedule of impact fees that should be charged to new development. Based on current projections, the District needs to add capacity at the elementary and middle school levels to accommodate projected enrollment and implementation of recent legislation. To address these needs,the District plans to build a new elementary to replace Des Moines Elementary School to increase its student capacity, add classrooms at existing elementary schools, and build one new middle school. In addition,new modular or portables may need to be added at individual elementary schools and middle schools to accommodate future enrollment. At this time it has been assumed that additional land will not be needed to accommodate the new schools; however, land will be necessary in the future to support the District's long range facilities plan and the Educational Strategic Plan. -2 - SECTION 2—STANDARD OF SERVICE King County Code 21 A.06 refers to a"Standard of Service"that each school district must establish in order to ascertain its overall capacity. School facility and student capacity needs are dictated by the types and amounts of space required to accommodate the District's adopted educational program. The educational program standards which typically drive facility space needs include grade configuration, optimum facility size, class size, educational program offerings, classroom utilization and scheduling requirements, and use of relocatable classrooms (portables). District educational program standards may change in the future as a result of changes in the education program, special programs class sizes, grade span configurations, and use of new technology, as well as other physical aspects of the school facilities. In addition, the State Legislature's implementation of requirements for reduced K-3 class size will also impact school capacity and educational program standards. (The District currently offers full-day kindergarten.) The school capacity inventory will be reviewed periodically and adjusted for any changes to the educational program standards. "These changes will also be reflected in future updates of this CFP. The Standard of Service outlined below reflects only those programs and educational opportunities provided to students that directly affect the capacity of school buildings. The special programs listed below require classroom space, thus the permanent capacity of some buildings housing these programs has been reduced. Table I Class Size—Standard of Service Grade Level Average Class Size Based on Standard of Service Kindergarten 24* Grades 1 —3 25* Grades 4—6 27 Grades 7—8 30 Grades 9— 12 32 *The District standard for K-3 will change to 17:1 in 2019(see Table 7). It is not possible to achieve 100%utilization of all regular teaching stations throughout the day. Therefore, classroom capacity is adjusted using a utilization factor of available teaching stations depending on the physical characteristics of the facility and educational program needs. - 3 - I I Elementary School Standard of Service Models • Special education for students with disabilities may be provided in self- contained classrooms. • All students are provided music instruction in a separate classroom. « All students will have scheduled time in a special classroom. • Identified students will also be provided other educational opportunities in classrooms designated as follows: + Resource Rooms + English Language Learners(ELL) + Education for Disadvantaged Students (Title I) + Gifted Education + Learning Assisted Programs + Severely Behavior Disorder + Transition Rooms + Mild, Moderate, and Severe Disabilities + Developmental Kindergarten + Extended Daycare Programs and Preschool Programs Secondary School Standard of Service Models • Identified students will also be provided other educational opportunities in classrooms designated as follows: + Resource Rooms + English Language Learners(ELL) + Computer Labs • Science Labs + Career and Vocational Rooms Daycare Programs « Alternative Program Spaces - 4 - SECTION THREE: CAPITAL FACILITIES INVENTORY This section provides an inventory of capital facilities owned and operated by the District including schools and relocatable classrooms (modulars or portables). School facility capacity was inventoried based on the space required to accommodate the District's adopted educational program standards. See Section Two: Standard of Service. A map showing locations of District facilities is provided in Appendix A. Schools See Section One for a description of the District's schools and programs. School capacity was determined based on the number of teaching stations (or general classrooms) within each building and the space requirements of the District's currently adopted current educational program and internal targets as reported in ICOS with the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction. It is this capacity calculation that is used to establish the District's baseline capacity, and to determine future capacity needs based on projected student enrollment. The school capacity inventory is summarized in Tables 2, 3, and 4. As the District implements reduced K-3 class size requirements and grade reconfiguration, the inventory will reflect adjustments in the Standard of Service (see Tables 7-B and 7-C). Relocatable Classrooms (Portables) Relocatable classrooms (portables) are used as interim classroom space to house students until funding can be secured to construct permanent classrooms. The District currently uses 27 relocatable classrooms at various school sites throughout the District to provide additional interim general classroom capacity. A typical relocatable classroom can provide capacity for a full-size class of students. Current use of relocatable classrooms throughout the District is summarized in Table 5. -5- Table 2 Elementary School Level Inventory Building Area Teaching Permanent Elementary School (sq.ft.) Stations* Capacity** Beverly Park at Glendale ES 58,145 22 514 Bow Lake ES 76,108 30 Cedarhurst ES 68,916 26 619 Des Moines ES 41,766_......._. _..,__.....1-------- ........ ........._.....47.i...........__ Gregory Heights ES 65,978 27 585 Hazel Valley ES 65,346 26 452 Hilltop ES 51,532 24 594 Madrona ES 69,240 25 598 Mary ista_ES 68,462 27 621 McMicken Heights ES 69,979 25 582 Midway ES 66,096 25 610 Mount View ES 67,783 26 628 North Hill ES 65,665 27 636 Parkside ES 68,857 26 622 Seahurst ES 59,967 27 585 Shorewood ES 60,326 22 483 Southern Heights ES 32,942 15 336 White Center ES 65,654 26 622 TOTAL_ _ 1,122,762 445 10,231 * Teaching Station definition: A space designated as a classroom.Other stations include spaces designated for special education and pull-out programs. ** General classrooms -6- I Table 3 Middle School Level Inventory*** Middle School Building Area Teaching Stations* Permanent (sq.ft.) Capacity** Cascade MS 90,582 34 986 Chinook MS 87,476 27 783 Pacific MS 73,941 24 696 Sylvester MS 92,617 30 870 Big Picture MS (at Manhattan)^ 2 58 Choice (at Woodside)^ _-__.-._.- ...........................-5.g---...................... TOTAL 344,616 119 3,451 * Teaching Station Definition: A space designated as a general classroom.Other stations include spaces designated for special education and pull-out programs. ** General classrooms. ***Does not include alternative programs: CHOICE Academy MS/HS at Woodside site. ^The District anticipates that the Big Picture and Choice programs will be relocated in the 2019-20 school year to another District facility or leased space. Inventory adjustments will be reflected in future updates to this Capital Facilities Plan. Table 4 High School Level Inventory*** ....................... Building Area Teaching Permanent High School (vq.ft.) Stations* Capacity** Raisbeck Aviation HS 87,934 14 448 Big Picture HS (atNlanhaaan)^ 29,141 10 320 _.._...-................__------- ......-._................... Evergreen HS 161,456 48 1,536 HighlineHS 214,919 59 1,500 Mount Rainier HS 205,159 47 1,504 TyeeHS.................................................................._..,_..........._,....1.4.3'.'_0.1.......... _..38..............._. 1,216 TOTALS 841,710 227 6,524^^ *Teaching Station definition: A space designated as a general classroom. Other stations include spaces designated for special education and pull-out programs. ** Regular classrooms. ***Does not include alternative programs:CHOICE Academy MS/HS at Woodside site; New Start ITS at Salmon Creek site;and Puget Sound Skills Center. ^The District anticipates that the Big Picture program will be relocated in the 2019-20 school year to another District facility or leased space. Inventory adjustments will be reflected in future updates to this Capital Facilities Plan. ^^Total capacity at the high school level may be affected as the District makes programmatic changes in its small school high schools: Tyee HS and Evergreen ITS.For example,spaces currently identified as teaching stations may be needed to serve special programs. -7_ Table S Relocatable Classrooms (Portable) Inventory Elementary School Relocatables** Other*** Interim Capacity Beverly Park at Glendale _ 0 2 0 Bow Lake 0 4 0 Cedarhurst 1 3 25 Des Moines 0 1 0 Gregory Heights 0 0 0 Hazel Valley 3 1 75 Hilltop 5 1 125 Madrona 2 0 50 Marvista 2 0 50 McMicken Heights 0 0 0 Midway 4 0 too Mount View 4 0 too North Hill 0 0 0 _______________ ­0 .....__________.______________..,...............,.........,...._....--- ..--------- _ Parkside 0 0 0 Seahurst 2 2 50 Shorewood _ 1 ---'-'-3 25 .. .................................................. Southern Heights 2 1 50 White Center I __......_3. ... .... 25 TOTAL____________________________ 27__________ 21 675 Middle School Relocatables** Other *** Interim Capacity Cascade 0 3 0 Chinook 5 l 145 Pacific 4 0 116 Sylvester 2 2 58 Big Picture MS 4 7 116 TOTAL 15 13 435 High School Relocatable** Other*** Interim Capacity Raisbeck Aviation HS 0 0 0 Big Picture HS 0 0 0 Evergreen HS 3 2 96 Highline HS 0 0 0 Mount Rainier HS 0 0 0 Tyee HS 0 1 0 TOTALS 3 3 96 **Used for regular classroom capacity. ***The relocatables referenced under"other relocatables"are used for special pull-out programs, storage, community use,etc. -8- SECTIONFOUR: STUDENT ENROLLMENT TRENDSAND PROJECTIONS Generally, enrollment projections using historical calculations are most accurate for the initial years of the forecast period. Moving further into the future, more assumptions about economic conditions, land use, and demographic trends in the area affect the projection. Monitoring birth rates in the County and population growth for the area are essential yearly activities in the ongoing management of the CFP. In the event that enrollment growth slows, plans for new facilities can be delayed. It is much more difficult, however, to initiate new projects or expedite projects in the event enrollment growth exceeds the projections. With the assistance of a professional demographer,the District has developed its own methodology for forecasting future enrollments. This methodology, a modified cohort survival method, considers a variety of factors to evaluate the potential student population growth for the years 2018 through 2023. These factors include: projected births, projected growth in the K-12 population, and a model which considers growth in population and housing within the District's boundaries. The methodology also considers the potential impacts on enrollment due to the recent opening of a charter school within the District's boundaries. Certain assumptions are made regarding the continued enrollment at the charter school. Therefore, the methodology and the resulting projections should be considered conservative. District enrollment has increased in recent years, including a 5.87% increase since 2009. Using the modified cohort survival projections, a total enrollment of 19,703 students is expected in 2023. In other words, the District projects an increase of 3.79% in student enrollment (or 720 students) between 2017 and 2023. See Appendix B (Enrollment projections from Les Kendrick, December 2017.) Table 6 Projected Student Enrollment 2018-2023 Actual Percen[ Projection 2017* 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Change Cltonge 18,983 18,932 18,941 18,974 19,132 19,436 19,703 720 3.79% "Actual October 2017 enrollment -9- SECTION FIVE: CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECTIONS FOR FUTURE NEEDS Projected future capacity needs, shown in Tables 7-A through 7-C, are derived by applying the projected number of students to the projected permanent capacity. It is not the District's policy to include relocatable classrooms when determining future capital facility needs; therefore, interim capacity provided by relocatable classrooms is not included in this analysis.The District will utilize relocatables as necessary to address interim capacity needs. Information on relocatable classrooms by grade level and interim capacity can be found in Table 5. Information on planned construction i projects can be found in the Financing Plan, Table 8. Recent state-level policy decisions impact the District's capacity analysis. Engrossed Senate House Bill 2261, adopted in 2009, requires school districts to implement full-day kindergarten by 2018. SHB 2776, passed in 2010, requires school districts to reduce K-3 class sizes to 17 students per teacher. Finally, in November 2014, the voters passed Initiative 1351, which requires reduced class sizes across all grades (K-12). The District has proactively implemented full day kindergarten, which reduced the number of available regular classrooms in elementary schools distrietwide. Table 7 assumes that K-3 class size reduction is implemented by 2019 and that grade levels are reconfigured to K-5, 6-8, and 9-12 in 2019. All scenarios include the capacity related projects the District is planning during the six-year planning period. Future updates to this Plan will incorporate any funded implementation of Initiative 1351. -10- i Table 7 Projected Student Capacity-2018 through 2023 i lslenrerifor School Level--Sur hs e icleney 2017* 2018 2019^ 2020 2021 2022E223Existing Permanent Capacity 10,231 10,231 9,034 9576 9576 9,576......._..-- -----...-Added Permanent Capacity 0 0 542" 0 0 Total Permanent Capacity** 10,231 10,231 9,576 9,576 9,576 9,576 9,576 Enrollment 10,583 10,550 9,074 9,131 9,278 9,439 1 9,625 Surplus (Deficiency)** (352) (319) 502 445 298 137 (49) Permanent Capacity *Actnml October 2017 enrollment **Does not include portable capacity °'Implementation of reduced K-3 class size and adjusted Standard of Service; Movement of 6"grade to middle school level "Addition of new classrooms at existing elementary schools and New Des Moines Elementary School opens at the Zenith site with added capacity Middle School Level--Surplus/Deficierrcp 2017* 2018 2019^ 2020 2021 2022 2023 ------ ------- - Existing Permanent Capacity 3,451 3,451 3,451 4,401 4,401P-4 4,401 ---------------------- Added Permanent Capacity 0 0 950' 0 0 0 Total Permanent Capacity** 3,451 3,451 4,401 4,401 4,4014,40L _._ t ______________________._ __..._____________....,.,...________..............---__-..,Enrollment 2542 2644 4,232 4276 4,255 4,095 Surplus (Deficiency)** 909 807 169 125 146 248 306 Permanent Capacity *AZfual OcIciber201.7..eitroIInternl........................................................._................,................................... **Does not include portable capacity ^Movement of 6"i grade to middle school level 'New middle school capacity added 11i=h School Level--Surphis/Dellclenc 2017* 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Existing Permanent Capacity 6,524 6,524 6,524 6,524- 6,524" 6,524 6,524 _.,.......... Added Permanent Capacity 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Permanent Capacity** 6,524 6,524 6,524 6,524 6,524 6,524 6,524 Enrollment 5,858 5,738 5,635 5,566 5,599 5,844 5,983 666_.__ Surplus (Deficiency)** 786 889 958 925 680 541 Permanent Capacity *Actual October 2017 enrollment **Does not include portable capacity. "Highline High School re-opens with at current site. _11_ I SECTION SIX: FINANCING PLAN i Planned Improvements The Finance Plan focuses on ca al aci'ty related projects needed to accommodate recent and projected growth in the District. Based upon the scenario presented in Table 3, the District will need to add permanent classroom capacity at both the elementary school and middle school grade levels. Pursuant to the Board's approval of the Capital Facilities Advisory Committee's final recommendations and the voters' approval of the 2016 bond, the District will: (1) add space to the new Des Moines Elementary School (replacement school at the Zenith site); (2) construct new elementary school classrooms at various sites, and (3) construct a new middle school. All new schools will be located on land currently owned by the District. In addition, new relocatable classrooms (portables)may need to be added at individual elementary schools and middle schools to accommodate future enrollment or to provide interim classrooms until penmanent classroom capacity is built. The District has identified "non-capacity" capital needs at existing schools including the replacement of Highline High School and safety/security improvements at various schools. Financing for Planned Improvements Funding for planned improvements is typically secured from a number of sources including voter- approved bonds, State match funds, and impact fees. General Obligation Bonds:Bonds are typically used to fund construction of new schools and other capital improvement projects, and require a 60% voter approval. The District's voters in November 2016 approved by 66.99% a $299.85 million school construction bond to fund the projects identified in this Plan. State School Construction Assistance Program Funds: State School Construction Assistance funds come from the Common School Construction Fund. The State deposits revenue from the sale of renewable resources from State school lands set aside by the Enabling Act of 1889 into the Common School Account. If these sources are insufficient to meet needs, the Legislature can appropriate General Obligation Bond funds or the Superintendent of Public Instruction can prioritize projects for funding. School districts may qualify for State School Construction Assistance funds for specific capital projects based on a prioritization system. The District received funding in the amount of $6.27 million from Senate Bill 6080 to address a portion of the classrooms needed for implementation of reduced K-3 class sizes. -12- Impact Fees: Impact fees are a means of supplementing traditional funding sources for construction of public facilities needed to accommodate new development. See Section 7 School Impact Fees. The District also receives some funding toward school construction from the Port of Seattle/Federal Aviation Administration. This funding applies to the Des Moines Elementary Replacement and Addition project and the Highline High School replacement project. The Six-Year Financing Plan shown on Table 8 demonstrates how the District intends to fund new construction capacity and improvements to school facilities for the years 2018-2023.The financing components include bonds, SCAP funds, Port/FAA funds, and impact fees. The Financing Plan separates projects and portions of projects which add capacity from those which do not, since the latter are generally not appropriate for impact fee funding. Table 8 Capital Facilities Financing Plan (Costs in Millions)** Project 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Total Bonds/ j State Impact Port/FAA Cost Local Funds Fees — Funds Elementa Schools Des Moines Elementary 30,000 27,782 $57.782 X X X X Replacement and Addition Elementary School 3 00 500 $A ow X SB X Classrooms—vanous sites 6080 Funds Middle Schools New Middle School(950 45.70 45.70 $91 401 X X capacity) Portables Portables at Venous Sites 200 200 200 X X High Schools lhehline llieh School 29.000 29,000 90,409 148409 X X X Land Purchase $20 000 X X (elementary site for future wo"th) **All projects are growth-related except Inghdme fnghi Sehool replacement. "'Construction costs used in impact fee formula are adjusted to recognize Port/FAA funding. -13- SECTION SEVEN: SCHOOL IMPACT FEES The GMA authorizes jurisdictions to collect impact fees to supplement funding of additional public facilities needed to accommodate new development. Impact fees cannot be used for the operation, maintenance, repair, alteration, or replacement of existing capital facilities used to meet existing service demands. Impact fees in Appendix C have been calculated utilizing the formula in the King County Code. The resulting figures are based on the District's cost per dwelling unit to purchase land for school sites, make site improvements, construct schools, and purchase/install relocatable classrooms (portables). As required under the GMA, credits have also been applied in the formula to account for State Match Funds to be reimbursed to the District and projected future property taxes to be paid by the dwelling unit. The District's cost per dwelling unit is derived by multiplying the cost per student by the applicable student generation rate per dwelling unit. The student generation rate is the average number of students generated by each housing type; in this case, single family dwellings and multi-family dwellings. Multi-family dwellings were broken out into one-bedroom and two-plus bedroom units. The District has developed its own student generation rate data based on actual permit data from local jurisdictions. For purposes of the 2018 CFP,the District is using the student generation rates developed in 2017. See Appendix D. Using the variables and formula described, and applying the 50% discount rate required by the King County School Impact Fee Ordinance, impact fees proposed as a part of this CFP, are summarized in Table 9 below. See also Appendix C. King County and the City of Kent currently have adopted school impact fee ordinances and collect school impact fees on behalf of the District. The District has requested that the other cities that it serves consider adoption of a school impact fee ordinance. Table 9 School Impact Fees 2018 Housing Type Impact Fee Per Dwelling Unit Single Family $2,573 Multi-Family $3,646 -14- APPENDIXA DISTRICT MAP A-1 I Oil ....... ...... i C SERVICE AREA MAR si MW j .wmr ELEMENTARY Si 201 S-2fi17 ".S SERVICE AREA P....... ... 111 . Ix ham�acxao� v v � pQ(Yr6QAp1E2 Pill 177 8 y« c 1 '.; ry YEl Y- y r b xf'.Mr r -IrN.Wtiii f ,m + n M wt y y +ry I.,p '.usawdlY d 7y k' � bl "kbv r�I�WcY �' ,wu uY ZEZE Y I n � ,-' A-2 £-d I �04 �, _ �m�• S ✓d .i"'A d..�.FY" w«+M1X IY�- cA�.n kv w wrn wrrrow , Z "d rrr r z y x 47 %Fru 1dFN o 931u {a� C ' , u� 1� ,(,sp Jr Gar •"• Y 3Dv 00 4 J �. GtY�m dVW tl3tiV 37V1tl38 ............. rghr;9, °� l� y} � f w � i APPENDIX B POPULATIONAND ENROLLMENT DATA B-1 oNlaQil o m m wl� _ N N p za RII v zt RJR � N NI NI h 9 V Al aIP AI A� 4 o Q � � e E V°�� e � � � Q � � � eB! Y r eye ass � ass w 1� m a r P r 14 •q r� tf Y � da H Qe g N fC p `• o � R U yry�m N ^ ^ R �iISW YR N E r FS. W d,§me+µ Y tm b APPENDIX C SCHOOL IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS C-1 HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT No.401 IMPACT FEE CALCULATION Student Student School Site Acquisition Cost: acill CosU FacYli Factor Faefor CosVSFR CosUMFR Scooe Acrea a Acre Ca aci SFR MFR Elementary Schools $0 0 0.1518 0 0930 $0 $0 Middle Schools 0,0262 0 04fi5 $0 $0 HYch Schools 0.0654 0.0698 $0 $0 TOTALS $0 $0 Student Mi School Construction Cost 7Facility FacilityFactorFR Cost/MFR Scope % Perm Fac. Cap acY1 SFR Elementary Schools 1 site 9Z36% 717 0.151817 $6,505 Middle Schools 1 Slte 9736% 950 0.026254 $4,356 High Schools 0,0654 $0 OTALS... 72 $10 860 Sl0denl Sludehtl ',. Temporary Facilities Cost: Faclllt Facile Factor Factor CostJSFR Cost1MFR Scope %Perm Fac. Cost Ca aci SFR MFR ElementarySchools 2.64% 0 0 0.1518 0.0930 $0 $0 Middle Schools 2,64 0 0 0.0262 0.0466 $0 $0 High Schools 0 0 0.0 554 0.06 88 $0 $6 TOTALS $0 $0 Sludenl Studern State Match Credit Calculation: Consl,cost SF/ .Stale Factor Factor CosVSFR CosVMFR Sco e Allocation/5F Student Match SFR MFR Elementa Schools 225.97 90 0.54462 0.1518 0,0930 $1,686 A$1,T92Middle Schools 22597 108 0 0.0262 00465 $0 Hi h Schools 0 0 0 0.0654 00698 $0 OTALS $1,686 Tax Pa ent Credlt: Credlt/SFR CrecnVMFR Average Assessed Value 3E*$6.o2639 $105,778 iGa ital Bond Interest Rate 3,$5% Net Present Value of Average Dwelling $864,397 Years Amortized 10 Property Tax Lev Rate $2,054 Tax Payment Credit $1,776 Fee Summary F Cc V School Site Acquisition Cost $0 $0 School Construction Cost $13,072 $10,860 Tem ora g Facilities Cost $0 $0 State Matching Credit Calculation $1 686 $1,792 Tax Payment Credit Calculation $6,239 $1,7711. SUBTOTAL $5.146 $7293. 50%Local Share -$2,573 43,646 CALCULATED IMPACT FEE $2,573 $$,646 '.. 2018 IMPACT FEE 1 S2,573J $3,646 C-2 i APPENDIX D STUDENT GENERATION RATE DATA D-1 Highline School District Student Generation Rates In 2017, the District developed student generation rates based upon new residential development occurring within the District's boundaries within the preceding five year period. The District compared student enrollment addresses to the addresses on permits for new dwelling units. Future updates to the Capital Facilities Plan will include updated information. Single Family Occupancy Permits for the last 5 years = 382 Elementary School Students occupying Single Family Residences =58 Elementary Students Single Family Student Generation Rate= .1518 Single Family Occupancy Permits for the last 5 years=382 Junior High School Students occupying Single Family Residences = 10 Junior High School Students Single Family Student Generation Rate = .0262 Single Family Occupancy Permits for the last 5 years= 382 High School Students occupying Single Family Residences =25 High School Students Single Family Student Generation Rate= .0654 Multi-Family Occupancy Permits for the last 5 years=43 Elementary School Students occupying Multi-Family Residences=4 Elementary Students Multi-Family Student Generation Rate = .0930 Multi-Family Occupancy Permits for the last 5 years= 43 Junior High School Students occupying Multi-Family Residences = 2 Junior High School Students Multi-Family Student Generation Rate=.0465 Multi-Family Occupancy Permits for the last 5 years=43 High School Students occupying Multi-Family Residences=3 High School Students Multi-Family Student Generation Rate= .0698 D-2 STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING ) AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION PUBLIC NOTICE Polly Shepherd, being first duly swom on oath that she is the Publisher of the Kent reporter a weekly newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of general circulation and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continuously as a weekly newspaper in King County, Washington. The Kent Reporter has been approved as a Legal Newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues of the Kent Reporter(and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a: Public Notice was published on November 23, 2018 . The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $297.12. Polly Shepherd Publisher, Kent Reporter Subscribed and swom to me this 23' day of November, 2018 . p J ifer Tri bef€ Votary Public for the State of Washington, Residing in Orting, Washington u elf?7�9Fpe� -a'+ , Y m � "�Ca CITY OF KENT NOTICE OF ORDINANCES PASSED BY THE KENT CITY COUNCIL The following are summaries of ordinances passed by the Kent City Council on November 20, 2018: ORDINANCE NO. 4288 - AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, repealing and readopting Chapter 7.02 of the Kent City Code entitled "Water," to reorganize the chapter and update the Cross-Connection Control sections to develop and implement procedures to ensure the elimination or control of cross-connections between a water consumer's system and the City's public water system and to create additional enforcement provisions allowing for more flexibility. This ordinance shalt take effect and be in force 30 days from and after its passage, as provided by law. ORDINANCE NO. 4289 - AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, amending the Kent Comprehensive Plan and its Capital Facilities Element to include the Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent, Federal Way, Auburn and Highline School Districts (CPA-2018.5). This ordinance will take effect and be in force 30 days from and after its passage, as provided by law. ORDINANCE NO. 4290 - AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, amending Sections 12.13.160 and 12.13.170 of the Kent City Code to adjust school impact fee schedules and the maximum allowable school impact fees. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force 30 days from and after its passage, as provided by law. ORDINANCE NO. 4291 - AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, amending the Kent Comprehensive Plan and its Capital Facilities Element to include the Capital Facilities Plan of the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority (CPA-2018-6). This ordinance shall take effect and be in force 30 days from and after its passage, as provided by law. ORDINANCE NO. 4292 - AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, amending the Kent Comprehensive Plan and its Capital Facilities Element to reflect a six-year plan for capital improvement projects (2019-2024) (CPA-2017-7). This ordinance shall take effect and be in force 30 days from and after its passage, as provided by law. ORDINANCE NO. 4293 - AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, amending Section 3.18,020, entitled "Certain utilities subject to tax," to eliminate the sunset of the allocation of certain internal utility taxes to the payment of debt in the City's other capital projects fund, and to reaffocate the internal utility taxes to the general fuind once the debt in the other capital projects fund is retired. I This ordinance shall take effect and be in force 30 days from the time of passage, as provided by law. ORDINANCE NO. 4294 - AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, levying 2018 property taxes for the 2019 biennial budget for the City of Kent. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force January 1, 2019, which is more than five days after its publication, as provided by law. ORDINANCE NO. 4295 - AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, amending Section 3.28.050 of the Kent City Code, entitled "Imposition of the tax - Tax or fee levied," to increase gross receipts rates and square footage tax and establish a gross receipts cap on retailing, and Section 3.28.130 of the Kent City Code, entitled `Limitation of revenue received," to clarify the allocation of revenues derived by Chapter 3.28 of the Kent City Code. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force 30 days from and after its passage, as provided by law. ORDINANCE NO. 4296 - AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, relating to budgets and finance and adopting the final 2019-2020 biennial budget. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force January 1, 2019, which is more than five days after its publication, as provided by law. A copy of the complete text of any ordinance will be mailed upon request of the City Clerk. Kimberley A. Komoto, City Clerk Kent Reporter Friday,November 23,2018 19 - Emproymen! Bu•roll Legal Noll • Lap)Pill Local Noticw unionNotree• Lever N ton Operelron• bra"'unnre# li� VGPA-201B 5 listing to bray ow.and IF NOTICE OF T f g usest fur a wonstruct the CIN ail K , E o " H Co Ee'sNa ordinance willto lake line mnd .depble the ,CITY FKENTG se permit to construct namicpop C unity CereereaXeda d be face 30 Ilnal 2DY92U20 blonMml Cf]Y OF KENT new perk fedlit es - Dgvetlo emorv0 off a toEarn your coal days from and attar Its budget OFFICE OFTHE ciudlo a new Vnn ..led t 400 W Gowe4 oore9t li marknesa,e, es provided by affe ordnance shelllake HEARING EXAMINER Doren. Landing perk Street In ddwation before iback iet ORDINANCE NO, 42W January nl 2019, which be in force LE CORDON BLAU PRELIMINARYY Pekh...of, aheadirll tenKan, please For °re contactr Ja gene trAak op.-AN ORDINANCE of the Is more than five days SUBDIVISION conjunctlere whh a levee son Garnnam, Planner, Evening Pinaaea� City CUUaall of gone City chat Its duplicator as A public heading will be and fish haocal Improve- at JGernhem®Kant- We Take Payment. Of Kamp Washington, pleaded by law. held to consider aubd most palidep The preyed W Vg or via small J • � Live Instructed. Apmkmenla rise went amending S, liohs A copy of the antePVBtn alera,a 4,35 ear.parcel Is located fllong The at(253)956 5439. rcen0 county 12.13.160 and Pan or na chiral will Into 22 single family real- ghVBast bank of the #833902 MATERIAL HANDLER Blue Emerald Real aervT 12.13.1 i0 ei the Kent bd mad) d .pan request tlanlial Ippa, two lend- Green River and along 11/23/1B WANTED Estate School CIN Oodp to ndcugi elf The Cob Clerk, scalps tract.,one recr.a- Russell Road between Scenic Vista school Impact fee pgllpd. amol A. Ko..to, Lien tract, one South 2121h and 228IhW WXh Innovative dal lggna King Co: Senior norimalobs ales and the matlmum Cory Clerk stormwater tract end Streets. cored unique meuntlnp (253)25404G2 2p4o4104m ftve BE alldwpbla school Impact #B35118,11/23I1B three Insists aowes. Hearin Datetanhnak,le, Karen., Keep,WA 9B030 lace. tmete.The , D.81 hl BbMtl2mdnaRRPoNJRAW%talc P+epetly ie to- WEDNEBDAV, NOVEMmalkppfora con"rao IncApartment.Now Tops descmnao id all take NOTICE OF caletl at 26515 loath HER 2B, 2018 a, 10U0 mervartAvailable seoet end be In funds 30 APPLICATION Avenue SE and Nand- AM rood"cluralB...thul1 e2 BR., days team and after Its A poled Pnmtll Appil- fled as King County As- Hearing Location. KehlThe family-owned comLeila,et' pn4oa9c,as pmvldad by cation has boas tiled easwov cPanmel number City Hall Council sharepinyy gPactnldaas In high1 BR $946/coo Inw whh C of Kent Plan- 1B58600020. bars West a1 220 4th anry Mauntln.aP2 Bdi111130)ma ORDINANCE NO. 4'20 In SaMaee. Followin Heersg Data Avenue S., Kent, WAever sets antl access. Alsedwne,imue pplod -AN ORDINANCE of the Is a dabs"AoeofconWEDNL'$DAY DECEM= 98032 nos fir dears antl winApple. CIN GOUpaiX d1 Ibo Croy ppreatipn and toe pro- BER 5, 2018 1 10.00 Permit Numberhas sea°rnnjhenr 25 cough Cell Susan 01 N.hl. Wdllerk out, repg fop revltlW.Truk alp- AM C E - 2 0 1 B - 1 k'nntl5 253-520-9876 amomi g the KAaO ptlfaa9nn and BlefUdi slu0. Hearing La.aflon: Kom RPP3-21B1552 Enpraynene I p+6aodonca In assi ' TDD:711 DemprtlhtlnaMo Plan pas may be aadmoved at Cory Hall CallCBmm• The approodllen is oenenr ng dlatpmpm an aver pnb atPkWbn/a 4n¢pun/ 00 NO Central PaoBgds the offioee of Kent Plan. bars West at 220 41h avalleble for review at the wnrhd- The aped- weas %/ CPMhwdtMProcietwend E@manl'. W pnaudo Me non, Student 400 W Avenue S., Kent WA the Cityof Kent Eco- CARRIER ..."... of Karcher Do- Employer crrhadl Fuumos Plan of Gowe Street,Met,WA. 98032 ammo. antl Community sign NA located In Accentual Alth e Fecal Sound He- DATE OF NOTICE OF PermlC SU-2017-6, Development office. I.- ROUTES Tukwla WA, south of Conaetmree pDonal Are Authority KIVA#RPP3-21i4909 tad t 400 W Guwe Seattle q N APPLICATION: Nova m- AVAILABLE ANTIQUE SHIPPING fCPA-2Di66), bar 23,201B The appli,mi Is Street n downtown T%le Material Handier CONITAINER. from En,= Yhtn ordlrmvlca.shall take APPLICATION NAME aNllleble for npvia, at Kent. For more Into,..- Location:Tukwlla,WA load; skob.ards, drake, an.et add he in Chad 30 THUERINGER SHORT the GIN of Kent Eco tiaq goal ...lam J.- IN YOUR Shaft :Weekdays 12pm- cM1lnas, boekcas. days fears am afar Ihs pLAT admk arW Community son Qarmem, planner, AREA 4pm essmella, 40 places on Passage, as provide! by APPLICATION NUM- Development sees, le- at(2B3)B56-6439 or via Jd6 type,Pan-irnU sale this weekend. Fn- taw BER:SP-2018-12/KIVA dome at 400 W Gowe costal Hfdng Datn ;Immadete day through Sunday, ORDINANCE N0. 4292 #RPSS-21B4644 Street In downtown Igamnam®kentwa,ea. Call Today Mty/ GPW Snnkl Adischo a„ -AN ORDINANCE of the ENV-201B-21 / KIVA Kent, For more informs- This ad for publipatlon y Gpnppap Job OaenelAllon Snaisom S30.956,098] P lbi,l i r City Council of Ma Choy #RPSW-2164645 elan, please contact an November 23,201B. 1-253-872-6610 SlappAing antl R..e{Yirog www.coteAmetcom .1 Real, Waahn Win PROJECT DE9CRIP- Shamry Clardhe planeov, #833515 ^OPtlpf pl5M0, omuMlrp the Kant TION;Th..pPllcenY pro- at BCkmPo NOTICE OF PUBLIC -WkYpmail so Ot,ahOu• ApPIP....• C.rnprdhonsko Plan pusaa la oepa,oW the KEenIWA.gav q✓ via HEARING CITY OF floe stno CnkpVppM Annourceencer+b and is Colonel Feclllties eklatn fill ... It. A2tail 6498. "'�n. 0 IiY I Element to reflect a sal 9 A HEARING CEOFTHE ��'�'���'� On I'm Ipb Wm?12 W1I NEW APPLIANCES Alcoholics Anonymous year plan for eepltal Iha IUIVra dawppepmen4 d fox Panama aaon tin HEARING EXAMINER II Id4 be Pro vlBad Eased., UP T070%OFF for Information& mwnman pmlecis Na a Nal In4 edfu8lmanf Komt Rmporine am KENTTCWNHOMES W: kills. Ab MMataclhmt small meeting times call j2 0 1 9 - 2 0 2 q ) sab34qu9Mryry als6dl- N5338096. REZONE PERMIT �' 'u -Current drlama license Ding's,Dems,Scratches 2065B]2B3B. CPA2017.7 Ylda Iha tamaWhag par- es3369B A public hearing will b ,i�yl y�tl On stood etnndlrup andFactorylmperlac - Pleasevislt.elne ) Intoq pf Iha gamily dip NOTICE OF PUBLIC held to consider a re VI tlpNa 96arlg compularskills lions ThiIffs ordnance shell take Into a .Ingle A d rest- NG test at 0 f-als. aIHAi i) II Ningal dill Irrvu yll .mNe1 pa abfa to IIX a to `Under WaavmH4`^ wMOTE nloee.org days bed time 30 tlemo Iola A vino l CITY OFIKENT low CC, Commmnby dew �� "/67ea p For allrfoa,CUP con U9a�k PROMOTE VENT ateRr" tlays tram end Red Its aidlells,t,astormwaq,, DFFICE OFTHE Commaenhel coal 10 -W..h..ee usyerience Appbenoaa Dinel6V"0 widGIONAL EVENT slate- pmssage, es prevltletl by tlelamflan faelllly Tract HEARING EXAMINER ful MUBIalsolly : a plum hot requl,ad 146399dkwlia mah,Bid. fled with a r$1, Bassi- law. )wa Podmefmr lendaoapa SHORELINE Rasldae6M TawMrouce. -Ablity le provide deco, 206.244-6966 ,atl listing or$1,5]S loon ORDINANCE NO. 4293 W,w and a pro d SHORELINE ITIONAL USE >nnlrvp Th. IpfaPosed lent customai amrvke A display ad. Call this -AN ORDINANCE of the comet accessed Tram 2nnlry do$i na6an la L" Organi.ati.n and attan- STAINLESS newspaper or 360344- Clly Council of thes City plain Avenue BE are PERMIT g `5 APPLIANCE 293E for runts ls.. of Komt WesMngwn. also spin pro ogtl as LOWER RUSSELL consistent Wit the GHHyyk non to batail PACKAGE WASHdNGTGN NDI. adding $Wem ® p0 LEYEE SETBACK- Co mh4Ar®Iva Plan p -Able to read. write, and 9 pert of tpim develep�ment. VAN DOREN'S LAND. Land Usk Plan Map doe• 9 ad r. '9 .ommanket. Wraadveiy $1499 VORCCSEPARATION 3.18020, etitletl PROJECT LOCATION: ING PARK igqnatlkm al MU, Mixed asnretaiaa lu the)'atr Refri®amrear,Ral $tiro. $17B WAIN nhh Certain otlllowe object 21252116th Avenue BE U safhwesher ,{con NO OOURT AP- to at to Ilmnate the Kin Cou greeds RELOCATION se.. Tho oppld et sub Please subm tresumeto N sunset of the allocation g 0 A public hearing will be miKod a MuibPamlN/ Oa =:_/ kw Undad WenrenTy" PEApiANCES. Inctlpruea numbered 092205900] L _� erder@hercher-dedgn.uom Call Credit Dal hold to consider a (p 0RW p --- P PrMro1N, blips, duMbdy a! "Than in' " do", S 0 C at. to Zon6nggv Shoal Condltionel t F 0 R-2 0 f l'P Y6e f 2g!6-?d4•Bg6® support. Centauri pmp lanes.to Ne ppdyln.M al SR-B, single farmly emll� Use Permit to construct Hp 08-21732501 Pot a 1� Find your perfect pet .?.Iran at demumeb2s, debt I° the Chy. other dentlel 14-UNI mAhomo dal %fir% / in the Classifieds. Cemetery Pleb Logo Adematives, 503- edurpor conscience fund, OTHER PERMITS AND appoadma lei 1,4 mass Logo A and be dowlaca1p the In- of now Xeodv+ell and par, veiepmeM for the site on /' �j° wM,$puWpwwfll444sw4 www,Pera- PLANS WHICH MAV BE ee akefbns eleng the August 1$.2011. ��� Cpmphwy pYffie kl lain. legelallernetives.cam WrnM utility,tams to the REQUIRED Clvll Cam east bank of the Green He on Osio Advagiee your MpanlWn Vla'w Cama- ggoarppral fund once the struction Permit, Final RNer between South WEDNESDAY, DECEhf- ° Wryry two pro% III by Levan Not4es = In the chat ad plot Short Plat Board, Per- 2121h and South South HER 5, os tB at CEM. .Ifl jtl 10 upcoming garage sale tilde for 000, EMWbob1 pmrmcW land la raih@id. mile n your local community location. $4500 Call CRY OF KENT TT St etc,. The pro)ect Is 623-670-4040 effect and be n tmea 0 PUBLIC COMMENT PE Ipaaiaa along iha Hearing Location fll ' Id newspaper and Online NDINANCE days from the time , RICO: November 23 h nytlest bank of the Kent Clry Hall Council Id I ORDINANCES ° 20le Al December ] ".am RlCar and alon Chambers West at 2204 eel IBI"I Y�Itl' IatuaolYingIn you,di Add ad undo nd w„ PASSED BVTHE KENT maesega, as prevltletl by 2018 All persons may Russell Read between th Avenue S., Kent, WA 4 u ho,>Aohq#dal In your orals. Add ad In ygarl CITY COUNCIL 1fr, mmmanl on this *pit South 212th and 228th 96032 �' In1� Go,Mina to densities ad Th. Iallawn, are Co.- ORDINANCE NO. 4294 Pull COMMOM must Streets- Permit ZCA-201E-3 / and shared cut merles of ordinances -AN ORDINANCE of the be in welkin and ea RPP3-21 B3225 0 WaW%W fi4Yn g WEDNESDAYOVEM: The application Is y 1 CeIN eOD-SBB•1'627 to passed by the Kent Clry City Council of the Clry CdMGa th tlha Kent plan, `, n� a Ca1C1 B.264T find 800-out 88 Council on November of Kant, Washingtan, nI Departments by 4:30 HER 28. Ni18 at 1000 avalleble for review at Far O6erE9BBrA0 20.2018' levying NIS flminarN P.M.� Friday, D3Wrastow AM Current - ORDINANCE NO. 42BB oalstl s for budget afar01the CIN ],2018 lay 220 die Abe- Hearing Lppp3an'. feery1 • k PUBLISHING INC-AN ORDINANCE of the ryW $oath, Kant WA City Hall ea moll Chun. virvowsoundphublislialri OI Ord Washington, ashington City This ardlnance shall lake ®gtOlhg FaOtlh�aast proceed, Avenue West S„at 220 WA Pastured position NNMkMwpR5r1•r ppealing and mad.P1�1psgg ex ct and be In krce plans. .,monist JwWn 9e032 dbAvabwsea" Chaptei]gal of the Want Jappnry 1, 2019, wM1lon Garnnam AIOP S'aniae Permit Number: in DRIVER(CLASS B) (Everett,WA) „px�An. CIN Code oaMktl Ib apple Than INe tlays Pumps, at {253) AN- SMC-20,B-1, RPP3- Iminhs+lu •Water," to merganY.a altar dal AulNdaii.n a6 543g,l,ernhamo 2181563 II`We the ahk m,m and apfW AraYidnd bacess. he by The appb.e6an Is Sound Publishing, Inc. is looking for an a, dam Grosq.Connodl.n bpbINAN E NO 42a5 TIENTAI'IVE MEETING: available for Publications at aummed,vue snnw,wna�m control sedlons le de- -AN ORDINANCE of Iwo A public coasting is TEN. experienced truck driver With a(DLB t0 dove Idlanx basis and implement ay' Caanad ul tea CIN TATIVELY scheduled for the City of Kent Ecm -gQmocaoY M Kant. W..him mn, 1000 am n Thursday, noted and community out of Paine field area inEvereK,WA.Must have - the Islums to ensure ® is shovel P...t mica, I.- -anhonm,na the n sisl oodso of control em.eding Sac6nm pulicFebruary meeting g will9.This cat.d at 400 W Gowe obmis,lueemdo aof sseen s-cennedlons bar 3.2s05p of the Kent City public the well is excellent dnVlug record,be able to lift SD big and -a,rz tweet a water q Street In downtown Cade arvtlldad held ins Economic names cons ume#a q,,Man antl bnpoeUlmn of the tax - and Community Devel- Kent Far more iedrobar J. Odd�MlOdd hudL wwraau,xmsamr the _ en public water Toe m taw levied,to im opment Conference lion, plaaea carried Jr damnyei+ ayslum and tm emdm ad• crease grass receipts goer, at 400 Wesl SO G.YnMm, Plphnee g� Class abne Mnna dlltlWmatl nnWmeenant pen• rates and square foot- Gowe Street, Kent, WA Man at 856-5439 or Na 11b1 pg$It10U IS on the night Shllt (Stintingeal age tens and estebllsM1 a answm,wu vlsbna ullmvlrg tar mom vs&d Please be are p ae+m, This cIIN. tuel ae re.glpfa dap on re- Is ,cos meeting date This ntl0m fbNnptuabira0lipn dpp19%(mattky 9 pm and is Full-Time, 37.3$ ' Thla emmande await lake taullnpp. area salon Is naaled m .mange, enwgypmpare26,2a1B. hours erral Thesdiedulevadesandre uires effect and be In force 30 3.2u.130 of the Kant Clry pilaw men to verify him # Nom R q -some days from and ones Its Cotle, entliletl"Limitation antl tlate et least a week —NOTICE .vt ruicalrrerre", pad i as provided by cof larity.the al ocaton to of Inkagn9� f you move any HPJ+RINGBLIC {i6xibii lY,Must have knowledge Of the Pgget',,.sprodi i, ORDINANCE NO. 4289 tavenUoa derlveb by M1qyupa9lens, ple6Ya call CffY OF KENT Smmdarea=Must pronde current Copy of drming -From ow -AN ORDINANCE of The CnapipY 3-28 of me Kent J aroes CI Cotle. ason Garnhem, Kent OFFICE OFTHE .eoinonM+nm City Colonel l of the City ry Planning Services, at HEARING EXAMINER aWdraFtdthme Of lnteNlBW. -bonbon Lind at Plano Wbshin loh Thls ortllnence shall take 253-856-5439; CONDITIONAL USE -od"f'rovylisai AWa.Afng tlBw Kact eftecl and be In farce 30 jgarnrypen•NanhWB.gOw PERMR posse email dppli(dhR@ to: "''"p1pX Gomprehens Ne Plan days Imm and attar Its AD COPY-I dilpq- LOWER RUSSELL riex°'r' and its Capital Focused Ens I as prevltletl by elan Friday N"pubor LEVEE SETBACK- red UdE ATTN BRIYLAm0 c0tg and be sure t0-gym #rew Element to include the Mw 23,2018 VAN OOREN's LAND- S�UND smrniwune Capital FadlXles Plans ORDINANCE NO. 429E 4834804 ING PARK In hie subjectilEe. MI ancon nvanv,a, of the Kent, Federal -AN ORDINANCE of the .............__.................. RELOCATION PUBLISHINGIN WW2, A01AXm and High- Guy Coumll of the CIit Find It,Buy It,Sell it A public hearing will be adai ,smn,•n, -ryrtee Par School Districts of Kent,Washington, to- —lossi Hircom suai held to rewarder IM1e re- Forallddaurmostmnent]oh openings and to learn more about us visit our waddles:www.soundpubllshinp,mm