HomeMy WebLinkAbout4291 I
ORDINANCE NO. 4291
AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the
City of Kent, Washington, amending the Kent
Comprehensive Plan and its Capital Facilities
Element to include the Capital Facilities Plan of the
Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority (CPA-2018-6).
RECITALS
A. The State of Washington Growth Management Act (GMA)
requires internal consistency among comprehensive plan elements and the
plans from other jurisdictions.
B. Chapter 82.02 RCW authorizes the collection of impact fees
only for public facilities included in the capital facilities element of a city's
adopted comprehensive land use plan.
C. The City of Kent has established procedures for amending the
Comprehensive Plan in Chapter 12.02 of the Kent City Code (KCC), and
the City Council may hold any required public hearings instead of the Land
Use and Planning Board.
1 Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority
Fire Impact Fees
I
i
D. The City Council recognizes that the Kent Fire Department
Regional Fire Authority has recently been renamed as the "Puget Sound
Regional Fire Authority." The Council understands that the entity itself
remains the same and intends that the Kent City Code referring to the
Kent Fire Department Regional Fire Authority remain applicable to the
entity despite the name change until such time as the Code may be
amended.
E. The Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority adopted
amendments to its Capital Facilities Plan, and proposed that its
amendments be included in the current amendment of the Capital
Facilities Element of the City's Comprehensive Land Use Plan.
F. A public hearing to consider an amendment to the Capital
Facilities Element of the City's Comprehensive Land Use Plan to include
the Capital Facilities Plan amendments for the Puget Sound Regional Fire
Authority was held at the Operations Committee meeting of the Kent City
Council on November 6, 2018.
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT,
WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
ORDINANCE
SECTION 1. - Amendment. The Kent Comprehensive Plan, and its
Capital Facilities Element, are hereby amended to include the Capital
Facilities Plan of the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority and its impact
fees as provided therein, as set forth in Exhibit "A" attached and
incorporated by this reference (CPA-2018-6).
2 Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority
Fire Impact Fees
I
SECTION 2. - Corrections by City Clerk or Code Reviser. Upon
approval of the City Attorney, the City Clerk and the code reviser are
authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance, including the
correction of clerical errors; ordinance, section, or subsection numbering;
or references to other local, state or federal laws, codes, rules, or
regulations.
SECTION 3. - Severabilitv. If any one or more section, subsection,
or sentence of this ordinance is held to be unconstitutional or invalid, that
decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this
ordinance and that remaining portion shall maintain its full force and
effect.
SECTION 4. - Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and
be in force 30 days from and after its passage, as provided by law.
November 20, 2018
DANA RALPH, MAY O -� Date Approved
ATTEST:
November 20. 2018
KIMBERLEY A. OMOTO, CITY dtEAK Date Adopted
November 23 2018
Date Published
APPROVED FO�R�M
r
THU' "PAT" F ATRICK, C1/71 ATTORNEY
3 Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority
Fire Impact Fees
EXHIBIT A
U
i
>I/V
r
EXHIBIT A
2 P a g o
EXHIBIT A
Six-Year Capital Facilities & Equipment Plan
2018-2023
Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority
This Plan was prepared and implemented through the collaboration and work of the following and
their associates:
Fire Chief
Mathew Morris
Finance Manager
Margaret Martin
Deputy Chief
Eric Tomlinson
Deputy Chief
Brian Wiwel
Division Chief
Mark Jones,Pat Pawlak,Larry Rubel
District Chief
Kevin Garling,Jeff Richardson,Roger Kacmarcik, Kraig Peiguss
Battalion Chief
Ed Johnson,Sean Penwell
Business Analyst
SameerAhmed
Deployment Dynamics Group LLC
Governance Board Members
Fire District 37
Allan Barrie
Harry George
Margaret Harto
City of Kent
Bill Boyce
Dennis Higgins
Les Thomas
City of Covington
Sean Smith
City of Sea Tac
Erin Sitterley
3 J a
i
EXHIBIT A
Table of Contents
1 Executive Summary...............................................................................................»........,........ 7
2 Background and Demographics................................................................»..........................- 9
2.1 SeaTac Service Area................................................................................................... 10
3 Community Growth and Impacts of Growth 2018 - 2023.................................................. 10
3.1 Impacts of Future Growth............................................. -.... .................. 11
3.1.1 Growth Remains Consistent with the 2014-2033 Master CFEP.................. 11
4 Current Capital Resources......................................................................................-.........
., 11
4.1 Influence of Public Protection Class Rating(PPC)................................................. 11
4.1.1 Limitations of Deployed Resources to Preserve PPC ................................ 12
4.2 Fixed Facilities............................................................................................................ 13
4.2.1 Fire Stations...................................................................................................13
4.2.2 Support Facilities .............................................»............................-............, 13
4.2.3 Roadways - 72nd Ave South ......................................................................... 13
4.3 Mobile Resources.......................................................................,. 15
4.3.1 Apparatus Life Cycle Policy-.................. ............ ............ ............ 15
4.3.2 Fire Engines.................................................................................................. 15
4.3.3 Quints............................................................................................................ 15
4.3.4 Ladder Trucks............................................................................................... 15
4.3.5 Aid Cars......................................................................................................... 16
4.3.6 Command and Staff Vehicles.............................................................»-....,.. 16
4.4 Equipment................................................................................................................. 16
5 Standards of Service.........................................--.........--.............,......,.,,..,...,................... 16
5.1 Time and Origin of Standards.................................................................................. 16
5.2 Emergency response.........................................................................,..................... 16
5.3 Benchmark/Baseline Gap Performance and Relation to Staffing....................... 17
5.4 Components of Response Performance................................................................- 17
5.4.1 Alarm Handling Time................................................................................... 17
5.4.2 Turnout Time.............................................................................---............... 17
5.4.3 Drive Time...............---..............-............................................................. 17
5.4.4 At Patient Side or Water on Fire .................................. ...............,»,..,,,..,». 17
5.S Deployment and Measures of Response Resources.............................................. 18
5.5.1 Distribution....................................................---.....................................,.. 18
5.5.2 Concentration......................................................................... ...................... 18
5.6 Benchmark and Baseline Level of Service Objectives: .......................................... 19
5.6.1 Community Risk Types.........................................................»..................,... 19
5.6.2 Performance Measured......................................... .................... ........ 19
5.6.3 Performance Expectations-,...... ................ .................................-...... ... 19
5.6.4 Resource Capacity..........................................................----......................21
6 PSF Service Level Performance..............................................................................--.........21
6.1 Response Performance Findings................................................................................ 21
6.1.1 Reliability Measure ......................................................................................21
41P , i; e
EXHIBIT A
6.1.2 Reliability&Mutual Aid...............................................................................22
7 Conclusion of Need for Capital Resources 2018 - 2023,».................»..... ..................,»....-.22
7.1 Planned Capital Funding 2014-2033...........................................................--.........23
7.1.1 Planned Capital Purchases 2018- 2023.....................................................23
7.2 Progress toward Planned Capital Purchases......................................................».......25
8 2018-2023 Capital Plan Effects on Impact Fees ...............................................................25
9 Capital Cost Summaries.........................................................................................................26
9.1 Equipment Inventory, Life Cycle and Cost .................................................................26
9.2 Asset Preservation Costs..........................................................--..............................26
9.3 IT Capital Costs.......................................................................................................--27
9.4 Fixed Facility Construction Projects ............................................................................27
9.5 Apparatus Funding Schedule.........................................--...................-...........,........28
10 Inventories ...........................................................................................................................-29
10.1 Apparatus Inventory& Funding Schedule..................................................................29
5111 , ;_ e
EXHIBIT A
Table12018 Fire Impact Fees............... .....................................................................................................................8
Table2 Six-Year Funding Plan....................................................................................................................................8
Table 3 Population and Housing Growth Projections without SeaTac...................................................10
Table 4 Commercial Growth Rates 2013 &2016 with estimates for 2021 &2035..........................11
Table 5 Incident Growth Projections...._.........................................................................................................._..11
Table 6 Fire Station&Support Facility Inventory...........................................................................................14
Table 7 Benchmark&Baseline Level of Service Objectives-Non-Medical Related.........................20
Table 8 Benchmark&Baseline Level of Service Objectives-EMS Related..........................................20
Table 9 Response Unit Reliability Objectives.,.............................................._........................................__21
Table 10 Hourly Unit Reliability for the Year 2016...................................____....................................._....22
Table 11 Six Year (2016-2021) Capital Costing................................................................................................24
Table12 2015 Impact Fees................................._....................................................................................................25
6 1 P a g e
EXHIBIT A
1 Executive Summary
This Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") is an update and extension of the Puget Sound
Regional Fire Authority(PSF) 2014 - 2033 Master Capital Facilities and Equipment Plan (CFEP)
in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act (GMA) Chapter
36.70A RCW, City of Kent Code 12.15.060, and Covington City Code Chapter 19.50 "Fire Impact
Fees".
This Plan update uses data available through the first quarter of 2017 to evaluate level of service
performance,and the progress toward implementation of the 2014-2033 CFEP. The goal of this
Plan is to identify the next six years of community growth, determine the need for additional
facilities and their cost and prioritize those resource into a 6-year funding plan (2018- 2023) to
ensure adequate service delivery prior to, or concurrently with the impacts of development
within the service area.
The underlying premise of this document is that as the community continues to grow,additional
resources will be required to adequately serve the growing demand for fire&life safety services.
It is assumed that a direct relationship exists between populations within a community and
demand for service,which, directly links to a need to maintain and expand resources.
Since adoption and publication of the Master CFEP in 2014, the post-recession economy
continues its recovery with community growth and cost of construction returned to or exceeding
pre-recession rates. The City of Kent published a 2015 updated Comprehensive Plan that
continues a similar land use and community growth pattern. The City of Covington also
completed a Comprehensive Plan update in 2015 and has increased projected growth targets to
more closely reflect past market rates but,the combined rate of growth for Covington,Kent,and
unincorporated areas of PSF's response area remain consistent with the projections of the 2014
CFEP. As a result, baseline impact fees in Table 2,have increased based upon the updated costs
associated with funding the capital resources required to maintain fire service concurrency.
A new property type,"Regional Commercial"has been added to the impact fee schedule. Regional
commercial is defined as a commercial use intended to serve a regional largely non-resident
population. These property types are likely to occur near regional transportation,shopping and
entertainment centers and produce much higher fire service impacts than similar properties
serving local resident populations. Because of the service demand of these properties,the impact
fee formula places a higher cost share on the developer (80% to 98%) to help offset the higher
impact of these properties.
Increasing service demand of assisted care facilities continues to rise as operators of these
facilities rely more and more on PSF staff for support. As a result, the developer cost share of
impact and level of service fees has been increased from 80% to 95%.
Compliance with the GMA requires a six-year funding plan,the funding plan in Table 2 has been
balanced through 2023 with a $235,000 surplus using increased projected revenue from both
7 1 P a g e
EXHIBIT A
j taxes and impact fees to cover the $4.16 million in increased costs over the 6-year projection.
However, the timing of some resources funded in this plan have been pushed back in time from
the Master 2014 CFEP because of these increasing costs and limits on available capital funding.
'table 12018 Fire Impact Fecs
LOS Formula Calculation
i
F 32917 �ri"12.7FIa
COMM/IND $95.968.923 35% 32% 2J5 98/0 12,SDD,DDD sgft 52.31
HOSP/MED/CN/SCH/CHUR $95468923 35% 30% 2 98% 12,500,000 sqR $1.57
Table 2 Six-Year Funding Plan
Cost/Funding_Source 201E 2019 1 2020 1 2021 2022 2023 Totals
Expense Sources
Station Construction&Land Purchase $40 $919 $923 $1,286 54,540 $843 $8,552.
Apparatus $1,283 $1,321 $1,872 $1,462 51,017 $1,737 $8,692,
Equipment $1,858 $642 $730 $470 $356. $378 $4,4M
Asset Preservation $351 $363 $205 $195 $242 $100 $1,455
I.T.Capital $672 see $ia4 $146 $is $15 $1,07a
IT Independence Capital $425 $40 $125 $218 $22 $2 $832
72nd Ave 5 Extension $120 5120 $120 $120 $120 $120 $720
Station debt expense $13 $13 $12 $11 $10 $9 $68
Revenue Sources
Annual Revenue to Capital $1,890 $1,947 $1,986 $2,050 $2,100 $2,130 $12,103
Taxpayer Bond Funds $0 $0 so $0 $0 $o $of
Sale of Surplus Property/Equipment $253 $32 $98. $50 $284 $50 $767
Covington Impact/LOS Fees soon $315 $51, $600 $750 $250 $3,030
Kent Impact Fees $850 $600 $850 5952 $960 $313 $4,525
Councilmatic Bonds $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
King County Radio Program $0 $0 $767 $0 $0 $o $767
Apparatus Shop Overhead Fees $8 $8 $8 $8 $9 $9 $50
Decrease in Kent ILA for IT $0 $25 $75 $130 $130 $130 $490
SCBA Grant $0 s0. $0 $0 50 50 $0
Apparatus Grant $a $e $4 $0 $0 $a $0
Bum Prop Grant $o $0 50 $0 $0 $a $Q
City of Kent-Land swap-Partnership $0, 5100 $100 $100 $200 so. $500
5eaTac ILA Capital $1,168 $510 $522 $533 $544 $557 $3,834
MEE= ME
Expense $4,701 $3,50q $4,131 $3,908 $6,322 $3,204 $25,00
Revenue $4,769 $3 537 $4,921 $4,423 54,977 $3,438 $26,06$
Balance $B $40 $8311 $1,346 $1 $235 $235
8 1 P a g e
I
EXHIBIT A
2 Background and Demographics
PSF is°an independent special purpose district legally formed under Chapter 52 of the Revised
Code of Washington providing fire and rescue services to more than 60 square miles of urban,
suburban and rural area. Services provided are delivered 24 hours per day, 365 days per year
through career firefighters and support staff. Services delivered by the PSF include; fire
suppression, fire prevention and code enforcement, fire investigations, emergency medical
services (EMS), non-emergent medical services, hazardous materials response, specialized
rescue services, emergency management services, and public education in fire prevention and
life safety.
The current service area includes all of the cities of Covington, Kent, and SeaTac, as well as
unincorporated areas of King County within King County Fire District 37. Generally,PSF's service
area borders Renton and Tukwila to the north, Maple Valley to the east,Auburn to the south and
Burien,Des Moines and Federal Way to the west. Current 2017 population of PSF service area is
182,145.1
For purposes of this plan,capital improvements are defined as real estate,structures or collective
equipment purchases anticipated to have a cost of$5,000 or more and an expected useful life of
at least 3 years.
This update re-establishes the service level standards adopted by the PSF in its 2014 Standard of
Cover(SOC)and evaluates existing and future service capacity. Fire service capacity is evaluated
upon the ability of current deployed resources to meet established levels of service. Fire stations
and their apparatus are evaluated to determine capacity. A fire station with three apparatus bays
and the infrastructure required to support three or more emergency response units,has reserve
capacity when only one unit and crew is deployed from that station. Also, a fire resource that
meets its level of service objectives and is reliably available for service at least as often as it is
expected to meet its level of service objective,has reserve capacity. The PSF's goal is to deliver
service at the adopted level of service (LOS)9 times out of 10 or a service expectation that meets
adopted standards 90% of the time.
Fire service capacity is also measured with consideration of future growth and the fire service
capacity that future growth will erode when built. This Plan identifies:
• The current demographics of the PSF
• The inventory of existing capital resources
• The capital needs that have been implemented since adoption of the CFEP in 2014
• The recent historical performance to the adopted standards
• The need for additional resources over the next six years
• The funding plan to implement the needed resources through 2023.
'Washington State Office of Financial Management April 2017 with estimates of fire district 37's
unincorporated area based upon housing counts and 3 persons per dwelling
9 1 P a g e
EXHIBIT A
2.1 SeaTac Service Area
PSF provides fire based services to the City of SeaTac through a contract for service that began
January 1, 2014. SeaTac's area covers approximately 10 square miles surrounding the Port of
Seattle Airport and has a 2017 population of 28,850.
Three fire stations (two in 2018) owned by SeaTac are leased and operated by the PSF under the
service contract. All other capital resources previously owned by SeaTac prior to 2014 have been
transferred to the ownership of the PSF. As a condition of the service contract,SeaTac provides
an annual capital payment to the PSF for funding the equipment that was transferred but has
retained responsibility for the capital costs of fire stations. Consequently, this plan does not
address capital fire station needs in the SeaTac service area.
3 Community Growth and Impacts of Growth 2018 - 2023
In the post-Great Recession years from 2010 to 2016,�� o � ., ,.
PSF s population grew it
w at its slowest 6-year
rate in more than 30 years. Growth from new development during 2010 through 2015 averaged
less than 3/4 of 1 percent per year. Now in 2017,the Office of Financial Management reports the
greatest year over year population growth since 2007 in Washington State resulting in a 2.62%
population increase within the PSF service area.
While growth seemed to be limited during the post-Great Recession years,the rate of emergency
service demand over the same 6-year period grew from 15,626 service requests in 2010 to
19,765 (not including the City of SeaTac) in 2015. This is an annual incident growth rate of 3.5%.
Incident growth with SeaTac; 2014 through 2016 was more than 15%. The total 7-year increase
in service demand from formation of the RFA in 2010 through August 2017 is more than 72%
with overall population growth of just 24%.
Table 3 Population and Housing Growth Projections without SeaTac'
Housing Housing Housing Housing Housing
Population '.Population Population Population Population
Units Units Units Units Units
Covington J2.488
,203 13,783 6,368 18,480 fi,964 19,850 8,074 21,679 10,294 29,342
- ......_.�.....�...................._�..__...... ....._ _...,....
Kent 79.524 46.417 121,400 47.294 127.100 50,551 135:853 57.275 153.923
King Co 9,950 27,362 2,015 5,542 2,203 6,345 2,406 6,414 2.711 7,226
Sub-Total 46,641 120,669 54,800 145,422 56,461 153,295 61,031 163,946 70,280 190,491
SeaTac 10,176 25,496 10,404 27,110 10,505 28,850 10,884 28,298 11,808 30,112
Total 56,917 146,165 65,204 172,532 66,966 182,145 71,915 192,244 82,088 220,603
.._._..�..__ _____.---.........__........_a ._..,....._...._.... .......................� ...
The Puget Sound Regional Council's regional plan "Vision 2040," identifies Kent as both a
residential and commercial/industrial growth center, making it likely that growth rates will
continue at approximately 3%per year for the next 20 years.
The table below provides both a low and high range estimate of commercial growth. Continued
growth at the 2013 to 2017 rate is the"Low"estimate for 2023 and 2035,and the"High"estimate
2 Figures for 2000 to 2016 are actual counts from the Office of Financial Management, 2021 and
2035 are based upon OFM and Comprehensive Plan estimates of Covington and Kent
101Page
EXHIBIT A
more closely relates to market growth prior to the Great Recession and better represents current
2017 growth rates. Both of these estimates are dependent upon buildable lands and future
market rates.
Table 4 GornmercAal Growth R aLes 2013&2016 with estiml for N21&203S
Low/High Commercial 64,415,115 64,995,002 66,734,918/72,794,723 70,793,856/77,344,052
Growth in Square Feet
3.1 Impacts of Future Growth
Two methods of growth projections have been used in Table 4 to determine the impacts of
projected growth through 2035, the first utilizes the projected new units of the Covington and
Kent Comprehensive Plans and the second utilizes the incident growth rates from 2010 through
2015 of 3.5% per year. The average of these two methods has been used to predict the future
service demand as a result of growth. This method predicts service demand from the 2016 total
incident count (excluding the SeaTac area) of 19,226, to an estimated growth of 22% or 23,464
incidents in 2021 and a 64%incident growth rate to 31,532 by 2035.
3.1.1 Growth Remains Consistent with the 2014- 2033 Master CFEP
The pattern of growth and estimates of future impacts on service demand are consistent with the
2014 Master plan and the resource needs projected in that plan.
Table s incident Growth PrOections
INEM I
I
Housfn�Units 55,579 14.420 0,259 58.440 _ 58440 15,136 72686 72686 18,826
__.._... _...... .. -.. .___ ......... .........
.
C mrrclal S, a fil995nn2 4,W7 0074' 66,73g918 72.794.724 5,159 70,793,856 90%3, 03 5,982
Total lneda W52015
Rates 19,227 _ 2Q 295 24,808
Total Incidents-3.5%
Growth Facctor 19.277 26,633 38,256
4 Current Capital Resources
Capital resources for PSF consist of fire stations,f �
ire apparatus (vehicles used for fire and rescue
work),staff vehicles and the related equipment,tools and personal protection equipment needed
to safely and legally provide fire and rescue services.
4.1 Influence of Public Protection Class Elating (PPQ
In the early 1900s, major U.S. cities suffered disastrous fires that destroyed billions of dollars'
worth of property. In the aftermath, insurance companies realized that they needed advance
information on the fire-loss characteristics of individual communities.
111Page
EXHIBIT A
Since 1909, the Municipal Inspection and Grading System and its successors have been an
important part of the underwriting and rating process for insurers writing personal and
commercial fire policies. Washington State's Survey and Rating Bureau(WSRB)service is a direct
descendent of the earlier grading systems and is derived from the Insurance Services Office(ISO)
rating system. The PPC program gives insurers credible data to help them develop premiums
that fairly reflect the risk of loss in a particular location.
In each Washington community, WSRB analyzes relevant data and then assigns a Public
Protection Classification from 1 to 10. Class 1 represents exemplary public protection,and Class
10 indicates an area without fire protection. Insurance companies use PPC information to help
establish fair premiums for fire insurance, generally offering lower premiums in communities
with better protection. It is estimated that property owners in the PSF service area, save more
than $30 million each year in reduced premiums compared to not meeting the ISO/WSRB's
minimum criteria.
A community's PPC rating depends on:
• Emergency Communications Systems:
A review of the fire alarm/911 system accounts for 9%of the total classification.The
review focuses on the community's facilities and support for handling and dispatching
fire alarms.
• Fire operations&deployment:
A review of the fire department accounts for 40% of the total classification.The focus is
on a fire agencies first-alarm response and initial attack to minimize potential loss.
Here,WSRB reviews the adequacies of such items as engine companies, ladder or
service companies,distribution of fire stations and fire companies, equipment carried
on apparatus,pumping capacity,reserve apparatus, department personnel,and
training.
• Fire Safety Control:
A review of the community having jurisdiction's (Covington, Kent, King County SeaTac)
ability to adopt and enforce effective building codes makes up 16%of the total PPC
scoring.This is based upon the jurisdictions practices to adopt codes, train and staff
personnel to enforce these codes and public awareness programs to their adopted
building codes. Further evaluation looks at the process in place to review plans of new
buildings to ensure structures are code compliant and ongoing inspections of existing
buildings for code compliance.
• Jurisdictional water supply:
The jurisdictions water-supply system accounts for 35%of the total classification.
WSRB reviews the water supply a community uses to determine the adequacy for fire-
suppression purposes. They also consider hydrant size,type,and installation,as well as
the inspection frequency and condition of fire hydrants.
4.1.1 Limitations of Deployed Resources to Preserve PPC
Because one of the PPC rating criteria is the deployment of resource for fire protection,PSF must
maintain the fire protection equipment staffing and deployment that supports its current PPC
rating. PSF recognizes the cost savings that could be realized by deploying lighter,cheaper,more
maneuverable response vehicles to respond to EMS emergencies but must first maintain the fire
121Page
EXHIBIT
i
equipment that supports the PPC rating which provides more than $30 million annually in
decreased insurance costs to the service area. To deployboth types of vehicles,additional staffing
is required and currently, PSF does not have the funding to accomplish this type of deployment
and will continue to maintain its firefighting resources first,to preserve or improve PPC ratings.
4.2 Fixed Facilities
4.2.1 Fire Stations
Emergency services originate from eight fire stations located throughout the service area (not
including SeaTac)as identified in the Table and map shown below. The average fire station is 28
years old with ages ranging from 9 to 53 years old with the capacity for three emergency response
apparatus and is 14,675 square feet in size.Individual stations range in size from just under 8,000
to more than 26,000 square feet where training facilities are included.Currently only stations 71,
and 74, maintain more than one front line response apparatus with minimum staffing levels.
Seven of eight stations have some reserve capacity in the form of apparatus bays and dorm rooms.
However,to utilize this capacity,additional climate controlled space is required to house reserve
apparatus, alternative response vehicles, and equipment that is currently stored in existing
apparatus bays now.
4.2.2 Support Facilities
Support facilities include space and equipment for emergency management functions, fire-
training, apparatus & vehicle maintenance, facilities maintenance, planning, information
technology, CARES, logistics, and a roadway. An inventory of these facilities is found in Table 4
below.
4.2.3 Roadways- 72-d Ave South
An unfinished segment of 72�,d Ave S in the Kent valley was completed on June 28, 2017 and is a
support facility to the PSF because previous analysis determined funding and building the
roadway was more cost effective than building and staffing a fire station. This new route,avoids
chronic response delays caused by traffic congestion associated with S 212th Street and SR 167
traffic at the East Valley Highway. PSF's part in completing this section of roadway is funding
$1.2 million of the project's cost through a partnership with the City of Kent. PSF's total cost is
less than a single year's cost of wages and benefits for personnel to staff a new fire station.
131Page
EXHIBIT A
i
Table 6:Fire na'tralllou t&5upportl^ae i.ty inventory
nasal / yu .
Station..ysp4w1.1 Street 1p ase 195q 3A 213, 201(
1p1h Pi' 1p` 1
e ton 12 12562014OtM1 Avu SE ]]lJ 19BJw 3bav µar 091Roon]3 26512MilltaryAoad south UIM 1990 3bays Good 4V5 A
'lornn n J4E1111 Art true SF 43 14G] IPau .rlMahan IS 15Fi3s s[292nd street 12425 i99J Jbav, Cood a1 ly
sd 11. Hh'Is otinveS 13,lo, 19hU ]bul v Good ].WStahan]1 2W I I I Pod Av¢SE ores Jinl 3n.v 1.rd 1.99Station 78 1J920 SE 256th S tree[ 1]n95 2M5 Abays 6nod 31 1moot, YYV.ihX %43 83
Pplmm.flee Stphao£Ilp¢Danz dh 6F WYA
Onto no Sj.I 21a!W ILCI Ave sE ml aLend d,}.
yaner Snaipn Art V.-hl nntnp ay.a p 2(qy uwrd 123
fe"I' p,us!
AMM1ap £tluM I Oashood,Maintained or Funded hV MFhPFA
ontoLaan vexb nvu 6E 2eau "I a Wv C'd itC23
iralnln¢Towe/24523116tn Ave SE 4652 199G 21 leases>Olt GOM iV/A
frairoa Annex 24524116tn Ave SE L1 2 2W5 lj 2W5 Poor iV/A
APparams Shop 2067872 nd A_ 10,8651909 2fl 2010 Yoays Good N/A
1,isties Canter AI S J0911 Street 20"W0 19]9 f 2013 Good N/A
Cub Tuts ^lulu 39 Sx 12Y 02
Tnaal 1Ce 9]ey 2].2 93
p��ryryE exhibit 1;PSF tlService Arpeaa Map
!w!XMJ191MkL;'h!sX�w;uW!N`PoI...... .............
!Np9`^. VtVrAFDJ�G1fflm...Ell.51PUf WeSS5Nd9UW,4NyN0PPtl11 �N,CNN----99Lf-9�J.';'-9bNHIt�VNlNWtliM�WVE;Cf�!"tYJYfiYN�V,�6`MIM1`�G4v'iV�WIIBV1V�roMNVIVIJOVtl"W�UYIDYI'JJV�UIb.....I�yt....
..4Cfi..... ...........
..... a'NUWaI'u i
Karl Fine Oetharment
M1 rMadnlad Run briar,Fbal®.t SI.H .
I punvn¢84ellmns
Y
I
8fatl�el ti
rs
h
1
r
P
ft^'tiY; d
W�
4 P (( •_„ e p swn¢n re 4 n i," sr;u¢ e
,.•l��r�"1 �., � svr�°i r i spa rn
„
F
,
r
�W
( ._. , fIs
51 Y/Od la
�y
>L ;' Y Y � .11 , e N
L.�
,an 1
aw r �"� " r ° Mlles�. •,1 1^^1 ou I O6
.i:m� ✓ 1. na�r III .. .�. J•u I
noition�u�mmmmalmlhlmolmnomm�rammmmmalmmmmvm�wlmmmalirrohlimiliritvlmwuwlmmmuvRl�e�w�mm�rmram��!amrarv�rvamawowiemmlmmumum000muwlmxorboms�w�aaxmu�mmio�Irar�aammmmamitlm000mmmmoamimicmimiommmnmvvut,
IV! 1 ��1 �11
14 Page
EXHIBIT A
4.3 Mobile Resources
Specific inventories of mobile resources are found in the Appendices of this Plan.
4.3.1 Apparatus Life Cycle Policy
Agencies with workload similar to the PSF utilize a life cycle for heavy apparatus of 10
years front line and 5 or 10 years in reserve status for a total in-service life of 15 or 20
years. Recent studies have shown that the maintenance costand decreased residual value
of 20 year old fire engines is less cost effective than shorter life cycles of 15 years. Because
of this, PSF's long-term policy will be to continue with a 10 year front line life cycle but
shorten the reserve life cycle from 10 to 5 years. This shorter time in service,allows for
significantly higher surplus values when apparatus are sold following their time in
service. Studies show this also reduces overall maintenance costs, downtime, and
provides greater savings than longer life cycles.
4.3.2 Fire Engines
PSF fire engines are specialized apparatus equipped with pumps capable of up to 2,000
gallons per minute or more of fire flowwhen connected to a hydrant. They carry onboard
water supplies of 500 gallons or more and a compliment of hoses,nozzles and firefighting
equipment necessary to the extinguishment of fires. The current inventory of 8 front line
fire engines has an average age of 12 years and average miles of 84,340. The six reserve
engines have an average age of 20 years with average miles of 141,709. According to the
[National Fire Protection Association's 2016 US fire needs assessment, only 43% of the
nation's fire engines are 15 years of age or older.
4.3.3 Quints
A Quint is a multi-purpose apparatus or cross between a fire engine and a ladder truck.
They are capable of pumping fire flows like a fire engine and are equipped with shorter
ladders of 50 to 70 feet in length compared to the typical ladder trucks reach of 100 feet
or greater. Ladder trucks do not carry or pump water. PSF has two Quint units with 65
foot ladders, one located at Station 76 in the industrial north end of the Kent Valley, and
one at Station 75 near Covington. These two units are capable of delivering elevated
master streams of water like a ladder truck and cost effectively augment PSF's ladder
trucks located at Stations 46 and 74.
4.3.4 Ladder Trucks
Both front line ladder trucks are tillered, meaning they are built on a tractor-trailer
platform. The trailer portion has steerable rear wheels that allow these units to
maneuver into very tight locations with their more than 100 foot ladders. One is located
at Station 74 and the other at Station 46.Apparatus 713, (Ladder 74) is 10 years old with
over 68,000 miles, and 800 ladder hours. Apparatus 768 (Ladder 46) is two years old
with 18,000 miles, making the average age of the two frontline ladders 6 years old with
average mileage of 43,000. Reserve apparatus 715 is 20 years old with over 93,000 miles
and 1,214 ladder hours.
151Page
EXHIBIT A
i
4.3.5 Aid Cars
Aid Cars are licensed ambulances with extra equipment necessary to support their two-
person staffing with basic firefighting tools and protective equipment.. These vehicles
primarily respond to medical emergencies and augment fire staffing required to maintain
the PSF's Public Protection Class ratings.
4.3.6 Command and Staff Vehicles
Command and staff vehicles are utilized to support both emergency and non-emergency
operations of PSF.Command and staff vehicles are specially outfitted with equipment and
communications equipment necessary to support the mission they are assigned to.
4.4 Equipment
A full complement of special equipment is necessary for the delivery of fire and rescue services.
Special equipment includes all of the equipment within fire stations or carried on fire engines
and other apparatus that allow firefighters to safely and effectively deliver services. Table 9.1
provides a listing of the equipment maintained by PSF.
5 Standards of Service
5.1 Time and Origin of Standards
Time to arrival at the scene of an emergency is critical in the survival of a non-breathing patient
and the control of fire growth. The longer it takes trained fire personnel to arrive at the scene of
an emergency, the greater the chance of poor outcomes regarding fire and life loss3. As a result,
the standards identified herein adopted by PSF and are based upon industry best practices.
Industry standards have been established by the National Fire Protection Association(NFPA)and
the Center for Public Safety Excellence (CPSE). PSF's level of service standards exceed the
expectations established by these groups largely because of limited funding to deliver service.
Compared to the NFPA, PSF's level of service standards exceeds those of the NFPA in some cases
by 1 minute and 40 seconds.
5.2 Emergency response
Achievement of drive time standards are influenced by the location of fire service resources. If a
service area is located too far from a fire station (poor distribution),it is unlikely that travel time
objectives will be met. If distributed resources are over-used because of high demand, their
capacity becomes "unreliable' to meet additional demand at adopted levels of service. Because
of units becoming unreliable, units from farther away must respond in place of the busy home
area unit, causing increases in arrival times. If too few resources exist, and fire resources from
other fire departments are needed to backfill for busy units, the consequence is extended drive
times, resulting in increased total response times and higher levels of risk for life and property
loss.
3 See section Sand of the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority Mitigation and Level of Service Policy for additional detail and
consequences of long response times.
161Page
EXHIBIT A
5.3 Benchmark / Baseline Gap Performance and Relation to Staffing
PSF uses adopted Benchmark performance levels as those levels of service to he achieved as
capital facilities and resources are funded, deployed, and staffed. Baseline levels of service
represent the actual performance achieved over the previous 5-years. PSF's goal of capital
planning is to close the gap between baseline and benchmark performance. The CPSE annually
reviews PSF's baseline performance to assure progress toward achieving benchmark
expectations. Failure to progressively improve toward benchmark expectations can lead to loss
of accredited agency status.
The gap between the two performance standards (benchmark and baseline) should close as
funding becomes available to implement the capital needs identified in the 2014 - 2033 PSF
Master Capital Plan and this 2018 - 2023 six-year update of that Plan. Operational funding of
additional staff is also required to close the resource gap. Where additional response stations
and apparatus are required, PSF must also fund the annual operational cost of additional
firefighters and support staff.
5.4 Components of Response Performance
There are three measured components of"Total Response Time' and one currently unmeasured
component as described below:
5.4.1 Alarm Handling Time
Alarm handling is completed at Valley Communications Center, the public safety
answering point(PSAP)agency available to PSF. Alarm handling is the total time elapsed
from the pick-up of a 911 call until enough information is collected to dispatch
appropriate resources.
5.4.2 Turnout Tune
Turnout refers to the total time it takes firefighters to discontinue their current task,
assess dispatch information, don appropriate personal protective gear, and become
safely seat-belted in the response apparatus and ready to begin their response. Turnout
time ends and drive time begins when the response vehicle begins to move.
5.4.3 Drive Time
Drive time begins when the response vehicle's wheels begin to roll and ends once the
response vehicle arrives at the curbside address of the dispatched incident. When added
together,alarm handling plus turnout plus drive time equals total response time.
5.4.4 At Patient Side or Water can Fire
Currently,the time it takes to move from curbside address to the location of the patient
requiring assistance, or the time it takes to setup for firefighting operations until first
water is applied to a fire is not tracked. Technology to track this critical time is just now
becoming available.
171Page
EXHIBIT A
5.5 Deployment and Measures of Response Resources
The performance measure directly in PSF's control is the "Dispatch to Arrival Interval" and
consists of turnout+ drive time. This measure assesses response time performance against two
deployment practices,distribution and concentration.
5.5.1 Distribution
Distribution refers to how fire stations and resources are distributed around a service
area to achieve defined levels of service goals for first units to arrive. Distribution can be
referred to as the "speed of attack" or the first unit to arrive. Achievements of first unit
arrival time objectives indicate that fire stations are properly distributed throughout the
service area.
5.5.1.1 Distr ibution f 1'ir-,st unit to rar-r-ivc ..5er vice N."rnpabilfties.-
The first unit arriving at the scene of an emergency staffed with a minimum of 2
firefighters on an Aid Car, or 3 firefighters on an Engine, shall be capable of; establishing
command; calling for additional resources; extending appropriate hose line(s); and/or
beginning delivery of basic life support and/or rescue services. These operations are
done in accordance with Department standard operating procedures while providing for
the safety of the general public and responders.
5.5.2 Concentration
Concentration refers to the number of resources that can be assembled or"concentrated"
at the scene of an emergency. Concentration can be referred to as the"force of attack"or
full first alarm assignment. Concentration resources need to provide the quantity of
resources necessary to stop the escalation of an emergency. if an agency cannot
distribute and concentrate adequate resources, fire and life loss will be higher when
compared to the timely arrival of adequate resources.
5.5.2.1 Concentration I(FYeea6raaumhffiective Response Force
The minimum effective response force (MERE) consists of the arrival of at least 3
apparatus with a minimum of 8 firefighters. The MERF is capable of: establishing
command; providing an uninterrupted water supply; advancing an attack line and a
backup line for fire control; complying with the Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA) requirements of two-in and two-out; completing forcible entry;
and searching and rescuing at-risk victims. These operations shall be done in accordance
with the Department's standard operating procedures while providing for the safety of
responders and the general public.
5.5.2.2 Concentration/Full first afc ryn --.Zerr°vice Capabilities:
The full first alarm resources arriving at the scene of an emergency staffed with between
S to 28 firefighters depending upon the incident type. These resources shall be capable
of;establishing command,providingan uninterrupted water supply,deploying hose lines
for fire control and suppression, complying with the two in-two out law for firefighter
rescue,completing forcible entry,ventilating smoke,controlling utilities,and/or rescuing
and treating sick, injured, or at-risk victims. These operations are done in accordance
181Page
EXHIBIT A
with departmental standard operating procedures while providing for the safety of the
general public and responders.
5.6 Benchmark and Baseline Level of Service Objectives:
Table 7 establishes the service level objectives for; Alarm Handling, Firefighter Turnout, and
drive times expectations of distribution (first unit) and concentration (MERF and ERF)
performance. Benchmark levels of service are targeted for achievement as additional resources
identified in this Plan and the Master CFEP are funded, implemented and staffed. Baseline
performance objectives are the minimum levels of service PSF is currently capable of achieving
and must be maintained or improved to retain status as an "Accredited Agency' through the
Center for Public Safety Excellence.
5.6.1 Community Risk Types
Performance expectations have been established for three community risk types, urban,
suburban,and rural,^with both benchmark and baseline objectives as shown in Table 5.
5.6.2 Performance Measured
Washington State's Chapter 52.33 RCW requires performance measures meaningful to flashover
and brain death to be established, performed, and reported at the 90th percentile. If response
times of 100 incidents were stacked from quickest to slowest,the time of the 90th incident is the
time used to measure service delivery at 90%.
5.6.3 Performance Expectations
The following two tables outline the standards adopted by the PSF for the two main categories of
emergency incidents; those requiring donning of full firefighting "personal protective
equipment" (PPE) shown in Table 7 below, and those emergency medical incidents that do not
require full firefighting gear shown in Table 8 below. Donning firefighting gear is time
consuming,and consequently longer turnout times are applied to Table 7.
4 See section 4.2.1.7 of the 2014-2033 PSF Capital Facilities and Equipment Plan.
191Page
EXHIBIT A
Table 7:Benchmark&baseline Level of Service Objectives-Non Medical Related
wd Response Standards - PPE Required
om,
9�o Rmgn�'�! ni-
T..i Rtasaag-i,Ri,ft.
j J J 1 11
111itUnitt 2ndU 4 3�UniiM�,iF $C lo�'lp�pdo'ristAlam
90%
Joalunar,T..., I,—S"' A".V— J 55'i,n 1 111. 99./I
O T i4—35—: 90% i
12nimn0U--
Ist Unin Zridt),ut 3nd Unit MERF 0.6iii,e,if 1,1 Ali— Ped.nrnarue'
B'ric,lunis,k CA]Frnce,irg, l1 10 c I 10 11 10 I 10 c 'VA
11int I'1 25,im �Ii- 25"'-----J�o.. .........
_ � m
55 ' I 55 m "I I I
5-11J��" In%
Pi,'ahnigr4 b I inw, rin'.00— 6 10— 1".100— 9—S5— 1 90%
local ben onnart,R,n.. niin 15 set,'a"'in 05— 113 nun 00 %90 1
J"p ......
Table 8 Benchmark&Baseline Level of Service Objectives- Emergency Medical Service(EMS)Related
Response Standards - No PPE Required
total Bencbnoei�Reflex 7 nni.10 a" 7 non 30 teC
lit iJria Balance oflxt A�d Peffg...
Murk
Can I inin 0,e,, I 10 sec go
l 4"al Inixt I'll '-
i/.
e Inw
"—non.b."genout "'e� I "sec 9 a..not�!nm fw"
0.n,,hg.'g Dri Not, 4 min35 ee 4.55 sea90%
.......................................
_ Ilex YO%o
]van 00 sec 7 inni 50 1 e e 90%
Tani Kwdli.Ra".t Owl M0111101VI,or
ww"Now,WIN"
lit tj l Eraliexx,.f],[Alrrm Perfiarn..,e
fleneftrowrk can Pivcessing In.,10'ei, 1.10... 90%
" , '11—viae—iAlegJAit". in,.95—
Bea� 1u.45 e,,e 1.45., 9046)
Be.]xonafl,JDAv' Lime 5 Irvn 30.' 7i
Ung.D'J,n n—6�at m 4".V'.o' 30%
"Aff48J0ser mkii$olec q 90%
20 Page
EXHIBIT A
5.6.4 Resource Capacity
Finally,resource capacity is evaluated. The fire service refers to this measure as "reliability"and
is measured through"unit hour utilization'and the reserve availability of specific response units.
If an emergency response unit was in its assigned location 24 hours a day and never called upon
for service, it would have a unit hour utilization of 0.00% and reliability of 100%. But, if an
emergency response unit is expected to provide a level of service performance at 90% or 9 times
out of every ten requests, that unit must be available or "reliable" for providing service when
called upon at least 90% of the time or it will likely fail in its performance expectation. Unit
reliability is the best predictor of service capacity of deployed units. As workload or unit hour
utilization increases, reliability decreases.
Table 9:Response Unit Reliability Objectives
Performance Type Urban Suburban Rural
Minimum Peak Hour Unit Reliability 90% 90% 90%
6 PSF Service Level Performance
6.1 Response Performance Findings
Analysis of PSF's historical response data reveals sub-standard performance compared to
benchmark expectations. See Tables 7 & 8 Baseline Drive Time compared to Benchmark Drive
Time. Several factors contribute to this current sub-standard performance. First, performance
cannot be met during peak hours where workload and unit hour utilization is high and unit
reliability is low. Second, some areas of PSF simply cannot be reached within the adopted time
standards because of excess distance from a fire station or increasing traffic congestion. Finally,
latencies in current communications and alerting systems extend firefighter turnout times
beyond benchmark standards.
6.1.1 Reliability Measure
Reliability is typically used as an indicator to monitor the need for additional resources.
Reliability at or above 95% is considered to be reliable with reserve capacity. This is shown in
Table 10 below as "Green." As reliability falls below 95% (displayed as yellow) it is time to begin
planning for the deployment of additional resources to handle the increasing workload.
Reliability below 90% (displayed as red) often prevents reliable achievement of response
standards. Those units with reliability displayed in red have high unit hour utilization and are
considered in resource exhaustion and begin to impact surrounding fire station reliability by
drawing in surrounding resources to cover for high unit hour utilization or resource exhaustion
occurring during peak demand hours. This ripple effect of deficient reliability spreads outward
with the consequence of longer response times because units must travel out of their home area
to cover the deficient area. This ripple continues to spread during peak demand hours moving
out to other fire stations and often to other jurisdictions.
211 Page
EXHIBIT A
6.1.2 Reliability&Mutual Aid
The measure to which reliability impacts other jurisdictions is seen in automatic mutual aid
balances. Currently PSF maintains a deficit in mutual aid with all but one of its surrounding
neighbors because of the need to use more outside resources than can be repaid through services
given back to these mutual aid neighbors.
"IPablc 10 Hourly lhik Reliability ror Uie Vcar 2016'
2016 Reliability of Existing Stations & Resources with Minimum Staffing
St 45 k A St 73 (, J f11
Hour E-45 L-46 E-47 A-70 A-71 E-71 E-72 E-73 A-74 E-74 L-74 Q-75 Q-76 E-77 E-78
0:00 i 91.65%
2:00 y t 91.99%. 89.01%
2:00 91.22% ° 90.36%�
3:00 91.25% 91.15%r
4:00 OW 91.3795 90.78%�
5:00 1
6:00 �..,�}'..,. . 90.26%
6
8:00 90.20% 91.53% low
90.94%
9:00 91.62% 91,22%
1o:00 91.84% 90.49% 91.96%
11:00 90.81% r 91.18% 91.289'a
12:00 91.02% 90.49%. 91.04%
13:00 91.23% 91.34"/a 91.53%'190.77% 91.69% .
14:00 91.04"h '.90.02% 90.57%
15:00 88.7M, -90,75%
16:00 92.38% 91.08% 190.12%
17:00 92.70% 91.15%. ' IM'..91.8391
18:00 92.34% 90.78% 91.78% 190.13% '..
19:00 92.24% 90.89%. ', 91.59%1
20:00 92.7DYb 90.45% 90.72% - 91.83%
21:00 91.28%
22:00 92.39% ..
23:00 89.789.1
Total 90.26%, 91.70Yo ` �i +r
7 Conclusion of Need for Capital Resources 2018 - 2023
The most concerning evidence of the need for capital resources is the overall reliability of all
emergency response units displayed in Table it above. The only hour where PSF has unit
reliability above 95% occurs at 5:00 am. All other hours of the day are yellow and red. From
noon until 9:00 pm each day, resource exhaustion occurs with reliability below 90 percent. It is
expected that in the current year 2017, reliability will further erode increasing resource
exhaustion three additional hours each day with units unable to meet level of service
expectations from 10:00 am until 10:00 pm, all of the peak demand hours for emergency
response.
s A reliability update will be provided in June of 2017 with the annual performance report.
221Page
EXHIBIT A
Nearly 1,000 new apartment units and 300 single family homes are currently permitted and
under construction in 2017. Growth within the PSF service area is expected to continue at or
close to the rates experienced prior to the Great Recession resulting in further declines in unit
reliability and erosion of service capacity. This in turn, will lead to steady increasing total
response times unless additional resources and the staffing they require can be funded and deployed.
7.1 Planned Capital Funding 2014 - 2033
The 2014 - 2033 PSF Capital Facilities and Equipment Master Plan identified the need for more
than $87 million in capital investments to maintain fire service concurrency through 2033. The
2016 6 year plan explored two options to reduce the near term cost of capital. First, less
expensive alternatives to some resources identified in the Master Plan have been chosen, next,
modified life cycles of fire apparatus are expected to provide additional value to surplussed
equipment that can assist in funding new capital.In total,this reduced the cost of some resources
needed in the next 6 years but escalating construction costs and inflation have increased the total
need for capital funding.
The additional cost associated with PSF's portion of funding construction of 72^d Ave South, and
the cost of maintaining the apparatus and equipment transferred from SeaTac has been added
into the total capital costs established in the Master Plan. Combined with the cost saving
measures associated with the new apparatus life cycle plan the current cost of the total 2014
Master Plan has increased from$87.14 million to$95.47 million.
7.1.1 Planned Capital Purchases 2018- 2023
The table below identifies the capital expenses to be incurred between 2018 and 2023 based
upon the current known priorities and levels of service. Each year this table will be updated to
reflect current known priorities and levels of service.
231Page
EXHIBIT A
'Pablo 11!Six:Year (2f)1£ 2023}Capital Costhxg
Cost/Funding Source 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Totals
Expense Sources
Station Construction&Land Purchase $40 $919 $923 $1,286. $4,54Cf $843 $8,552
Apparatus..... $1,283 $1,321 $1,872 $1,462 $1,017 $1,737. $8,692
Equipment $1,858 $642 $730 $470 $356 $378 $4,434
Asset Preservation $351 $363 $205 $195 $242 $100 $1,455
I.T.Capital $672 $86 $144 $146 $15 $15 $1,07
IT Independence Capital $425 $40 $125 $218 $22 $2 $832
72nd Ave S Extension $120 $120 $120 $120 $120 $120 $720
Station debt expense 1 $13 $13 $12 $11 $III $9 $68
Revenue Sources
'.Annual Revenue to Capital $1,890 $1,947 $1,986 $2,050 $2,100 52,130 S12,103
Taxpayer Bond Funds $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $0
Sale of Surplus Property/Equipment $253 $32 $98 $50 $284 $50 $767
Covington Impact/LOS Fees $600 $315 $515 $600 $750 $250 $3,030
Kentlmpact Fees $850 $600 $850 $952 $960 $313 $4,525
Councilmatic Bonds $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $U
King County Radio Program $0 $0 $767 $0 $0 $0 $767
Apparatus Shop Overhead Fees $8 $8 $8 $8 $9 $9 $50
Decrease in Kent ILA for IT $0 $25 $75 $130 $130 $130 $490
SCBA Grant $0 So, $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Apparatus Grant $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Burn Prop Grant $0 $0 $0 $0 SO $0 $0
City of Kent-Land Swap�Partnership $0 $100 $100 $100 $200 $0 $500
Seaiac ILA Capitol $1:188 $510 $522 $!:33, $$44 $557 $3v834
Expense $4,761 $3504 $4,131 $3,908 $6,322 $3,204 $2$$3G
Revenue $4,769 $3,537 $4921 $4,423 $4,977 $3,438 $26,065
Balance $8, $40 $831 $1,346 $1 $235 $235.
24 Page
EXHIBIT A
7,2 Progress toward Planned Capital Purchases6
As a result of the Great Recession and the uncertainty of the economy during that time, PSF
delayed some planned equipment purchases between 2014 and 2016 and placed funding toward
the new Valley and Benson stations on hold. The Valley Station is now predicted to be completed
in 2023 and the Benson station scheduled for opening in 2028. All asset preservation projects,
equipment needs,and apparatus are now scheduled for funding and replacement through 2023.
The 2014- 2033 Master Capital Plan is funded through 2033 with the following assumptions:
• Annual tax revenue to capital between 2023 - 2033 averages $2.46 million per year
• Impact fee revenue between 2033 - 2033 averages$1.9 million per year
8 2018 - 2023 Capital Plan Effects on Impact Fees
_._ 7M n . _
Impact fees are established in the PSF Mitigation and Level of Service Policy in Appendix A,using
a formula based upon the cost of capital needs and service demand by property type. The policy
requires updating along with the costs of annual capital plan updates. Total funding needs have
increased because of this update,resulting in an increase in impact fees displayed in Table 12 below.
Table 1.2;201.5 Impact Fees`
LOS Form is GkuLation
i
I I
I
7 �
6 This plan will be supplemented with a capital summary including impact fee reports for both
Covington and Kent,August 2018
C&E costs adjusted down in 2015 reflecting reduced size of proposed Station 80
251Page
EXHIBIT A
9 Capital Cost Summaries
9.1 Equipment Inventory, Life Cycle and Cast
NOON Elmx�
Tntal
R el HWm1T ¢ n$ry m Aw Cl IJfpCvrb M18 2010 2Bza 2021 2022 2U2
f r?Me,fp 1299 5 J.!rtY. 1n a�1. $521:1 $19,3411 $43,751 $3,@93 $1 IM 523.4x$
Fire Me.Nn[dro6 t� :... ff11.400 $13,400'' Sfl $0 $0 $M.x
Self[ mad Brearhi aooaremylsCB41 131 $3,8914 10-Yrs $588975 $0 $0, $0 $$B o"
5MA Air Battles J91 S197ry !rvYm $0 5249.5x3
$CBA Mi--Mask..SABA rI II Stetlana Nq N& 10-Ye $31039> $0 so $0 5310.m
w.�w....���
Iaalllstk vests 1w $52y svrs $$Q app s13,123 $13.12E $$.2sp sq 55251 Sac]
_...
s Moaum Bnm¢S sx $520q ldvrs so ac $s>vo as>nr $s mq $1,701 5xp,a4p
ops Portable Bathos 'at $390@ 10.Yr5 52340p S7800 $7 HQ $7 B0 s7 BgQ ff"rr Sul.
Personal Proteetive Gear Fire35C 43100 7Yr5 EP4o.42G d21e 633 E24§.b18 34Yv'.N21 31aA5.vf Sadf,471 $arTBt;2S9
Fersdnaf Pmtreaer Are, H'aaMSt 20 83,400 &Yrs 520000 $0 S20000 $ S20000. SO SiOw
Hax-Mat E0APineat 7 WBOfll 3�Yrs SW 35p $1.1200 S1.431) $E367p 8.640 $3234 $a41.4M
Small Epulpme at 1 Nq 3.Ya $71J53 $95,843 $1W U4:1 M1,343 5100,350 $5J,9Yp 55xG32S
Defibdllatars Jr_ $11 coo 10.Ye $0 $0 $fi0000 $6000q $0 $p $12B,1)011
fuel Pumps it S>S 014 2CYre §p $25000 $25.U01I S25.000 SO E25.000 $JWFQG
Aa.i,GmrrnN Fuel T..k4 M $15 no@ J $0 $0 M so $0 %
sure 50
stetl Nln 2 S17 on@ _@-Ya c17.00d ;r $rl a ,r $17,nn s34...
F.Mifb SSs sop tsvrs #0 $35zOp EU $(
Steam Cleaner 1 117315 20-Yrs sR Sn nS NO s g0 $P,3]5
What.shoo E.-i am 9 $14 Bs3 2uvra $14 ns5 sp $0 sp Ep x8 $14.Q53
thermal Ima in Carneras 12 $9,837 10-Yrs $20,000 530,000 b30,000 $Z0.000 510,000 510,00 $11(k,w
Fi.T.11 M'M"e'a Na" 1 NA 10.Ye M8,000 $p Sp $1 $0 Sp 54B.8W
Ground laci Sq
N!M¢P HB924Aa wV rtM1f •••••••••••54
rat /rSi n nn 3fl $13, 81]200 Et]20 E13,20p $13,20q E8.460,
T¢thaf of Rea.. 1 SD
IHvtlrant Belmlltheoacannealansl S %135 IO-vre Sfi7 151 SB J5 SB7,3J $B nx sul Sp 5210.531
$1.857SSS $M24T w11,r75 5489,..10 VaI5224 111B1411 54.4MW7
9.2 Asset Preservation Casts
WMWQNNtl v! I'p 0 0 A B,
71e 512. $15 $54 540 S40 S151 8176
72 5o 594 533 50 515 Sol 5142
73 $40 580 $40 $63 S40 S151 5278.
74 $15 512 $0 50 $0 Sol 527
75 $53 573 540 840 $40 $15 $261
76 $80 $33''. $12 S40 $40 $401 5245
77 $50 531. 58 $12 $67 $15 $183
78 51o1 S25 Sig $0 $0 $0 $144
Emer MRmt $0 $0 50 50 50 Sol- 50',
Aop shoo $o So S0 50 $0 $0 $0,
Trai nin¢ 50 $0 So 50 56 50 50'
Admin $o $o So So 50 So $0
261Page
EXHIBIT A
9.3 1T Capital Costs
oi�uuuu�uuuiouuuiouuoioioioiouiouuuuuuuuioioioioiouioi��io o � 1 �M $i I�il 9ili111111l��� .
Fire Equipment Quantily Avg Cost LfeOvcle 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 ➢slats
Mobile Data Computers 40' $3000 &Yrs 1 826 $45 $45 $301 $3p $30 $40a
Desktop PC's 200 $1,om 5-Yrs $an MO $4fi $40 p4 $ag $140
Laptops/Tablets 60 $1,40g 4-Yrs $91 .$21 $91 "1 $21 $91 .$19e
ESO Field Tablets 25', $250[p ¢Yrs $g9 $t $,rj $01 4.63 K $125
i Pads for Tabl at Command 2 .$1,2gr1 3Yrc $1 $1 $1 $24 $1 $1 $30
Wersor9-3aBes Pad 7. $o $75 $ $0 $p $o $75
Cpmmand Uni[Maids Z.
IT Life Cycle Capital $153 1 $197 $107 $115 $155 $92 $815
YT rode endence Pneleet NA Variable $0 $59 $1.00 $0. $40 $110 see
6-wear 2019 20211 Spatial rqui ment Costs'n Thousands of 201J Dollars
Enuipme,oescri non 4$pamlt Av 6'.O'.IA L0e(:xle 2018 2010 2020 M21 2022 2023 Totals
Mobile Data Computers 50 $6,000 5-Ya $50 $0 $0 90 $0 so $So
Desktop PC's 200 $1,000 5-Yrs $0 $40 $40 $40 $0 $0 $1W
laptops/Tablets 60 $?400 4-Yr, $15 $21 $21 $21 $0 50 $79
ESO Field Tablets 25 $1,SW avr $15 $o $62 $o $63 $0 $140
leads for Tablet Command 30 $1,200 3-Yrs $36 $0 $0 $W $0 $0 $76
''.FSO Ennancements system 4Yrs $0 $5 $5 $5 $5 $5 $25
ypl leyCom SQL Protect for Tahlet Command 7-Yrs $0 $70 $0 $0 $0 $0 S70
Dedicated Will for SKCFTC S-Yrs $0 $s so $0 $0 $D 55
Mobile Device Management S Ym $0 $ls So SO $0 $o $15
Tel"oof upgrade to SQLSemer 5-Yrs $n $11 $0 $0 $o $0 '$21
I...Nation Support 5-Yrs SO $33 $20 $15 $10 $10 $11$
FDCARES•Ptmi-Ing,data management and analysis 5-Yrs $o $350 $0 $0 $0 $0 $350
MIT lode nndomcp N.J." NA variable $421, $40. sin $$EB $32 $2 "8 2,
6 ymar Total $SW1 $HY $273 $3a,I sm $17 slow
9,4 Fixed Facility Construction Projects
Station Project 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Totals
64th Ave $0 $43 $1,088 $86 $1,473 $2,876 $5,566
Benson $50 $12 $12 $12 $12 $227 $325''
Riverview $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0,
Covington $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ $01
75 Move $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ $a
Y
5-Year Contstruction Cost Summary and Tl mline in Thousands of Dal l ars
Station Projed 2018 2019 2020 2C21 2022 2023 Totals
64th Ave $0 $875 $839 $1,072 $3,638 $699 $7,122
Benson $40 $44 $44 $44 $3" $44 $561
Riverview $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Covington $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
75 Move $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Yearly Totals $40 $919 $882 $1,116 $3,983 $744 $7,683
27 Page
EXHIBIT A
i
9.5 Apparatus Funding Schedule
r
i
I
Unit Type 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Totals
Aid Car/Ambulances $0 $123 $261 $0 $123 $0 $507
Fire Engines $672 $868 $838 $996 $824 $1,030 $5,228
Has-Mat Vehicles $0 $o $o so, $0 $o $0
Flood/Water Rescue $42 $0 $0 $0 $3 $0 $45
Ladder Trucks $0 $0 $0 $319 $319 $319 $957
Light Trucks $Oi $52 $0 $0 $181 $0 $233
Pump Test/Generator sol sol $0 $01 $0 $0 $0
Command/Staff Cars $0i $171 $47 $165 $47 $146 $576
Staff Support Cars $0 $117 $28 $38 $148 $114 $445
Utility Trailers $ol $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $a
Ops Support Units $0, $o $0 $0 $o sol so
Tender $01 $0 $0 $0' $0 $0 $0
Skyboom -Quint $0' $0 $0 $0 $6 $0 $o
Unit Type 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023',Totals
Aid CartAmbulances 5134 5402 5268 SO Sol 5268 $1,072
fire too as Ck10 756 5840 5,
Has-Id at Vehicles SO 50 SO 50 Soi So Se
Flood I Water Rescue $18 sci S3 So' So 53
LaddarTmcka SO so 5352 53521, 5352 5352 S1.408
U Fll Trucks so 1292 SO
PumpTestYGenerator 50 50 SO SO, SO so
cammandistalcars So $75 50 572 So 4
Staff SuppoHCars S96 S88 5217 S1.57' $O S66 $624
U tillity Trailers So $o $0 Sol So
Ops Support Units SO Sp�o $0 SO SO
Teaider $0 Sol So % $o
Skyboom -Quint SO 50 50 50, 50
281Pale
EXHIBIT A
10 Inventories
10.1 Apparatus Inventory& Funding Schedule
6 Year Replacement Schedule
Unit# Year Unit Tvoe 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Totals
21 2000 S-UV so So S48 so so $0 $48
22 2003 -S(JV $0 S75 50 $o $0 $o $75
24 2006 suv $o So $o $0 ---$O $ii $33
115 1997 Enqine S227 $227 $227 $227 so So S908
116 1998 Aid $134 $134 so $o so So $268
117 2000 Enqine 227 S227 S227 $227 $0 $o $908
2003 702 Aid So S268 $0 $0 $0 50 Si68
703 2003 1 Aid 50 1 $0 $268 $0 so So $268
—— $F--61----
704 2oo5 Aid $o So so so $268 1 $268
705 2007 Aid $o so so so $o $0 $o
706 2001 Engine so So So so $0 $279 $279
707 2003 PU so So $0 $o $0 $59 $59
_708 2001 Engine SO $o so SO 5279 5279 S.558
715 199131 Ladder $0 50 S352 S352 S352 S352 $1,408
738 2011 PU so so So so $0 $45 $45
763 1994 —U—ti—Ity 71— $-0 —$O —$0 $o $0 $3 53
764 1995 PU so -$O $40 $0 $0 50 S40
765 2000 Boat Tr $o $o S3 $o so $o $3
766 2001 Engine 0 50 S193 9193 $193 $193 $772
767 2001 Engine $0 1 $0 -$1-93 $193 $193 $193 $772
768 2014 Ladder $0 $o $0 $o So So
769 2016 Engine $127 $O $o $0 so $o S127
770 2016 Engine $127 50 so $o so so $127
771 2016 Engine $172 $172 So $o $0 $0 $344
777 Rescue 130-( S43 $0 $0 $0 $o so S43
778 2017 SLA/Bat So $0 1 $0 $o $6 1 so So
7100 2008 P 6 $0 $0 --$44 $0 so --So $44
7101 2007 1 Shelter Tr 50 $o So so $o so $0
7102 2006 S LJV $48 1 50 SO $6 $0 5-0 —SZB--
7104 2006 s w so so $o $72 $0 so S72
—.Li 06 2007 suv $o $0 $o $33 $O --SZ !.W
7107 2012. Cross $o so So $o so $33 $33
22 2006 S LJV $48 so So $o 5-0 Sas
7202 2.008 Cross $o so $33 $o $0 so $33
_7204 2008 PU $0 $0 So $41 so so $41
7205 2008 PU $0 $0 $44 So so $0 $44
_7206 2008 Crcss So SO so $32 $0 $0 $32
7608 1998 Gross S40 $0 $o 50 $o S40
7610 2000 Car $O $32 $0 50 So $32
7619 2001 Min,Van so $0 So S30 so so $30
7620 2001 Car So $o so $32 $O $0 S32
7625 2000 Mini Van So $o $o $30 SO SO 1 930
--Til.l Va. 8jj
7628 1997 $0 $33 $0 So $o S33
7630 1999 1 Cross so $0 $41 So— So $o $41
7633 2000 PU So $O 932 $o so $0 S32
7634 2000 PU So so $32 $o 50 So S32
7636 2000 Mi ni Van
$0 $0 $30 $0 50 $o $30
:99--0
IT 2006 $0 J—$48 $0 50 so $0 $48
TBD 2018 Brush Truck $1301 $130 $0 50 SO $0 $260
Total Annual $3.,2831$1,321 $1.872JS1,462JS1,0171$1,737 $8,692
29 Page
STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING )
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
PUBLIC NOTICE
Polly Shepherd, being first duly sworn on oath that she is the
Publisher of the
Kent Reporter
a weekly newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of general
circulation and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date
of publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language
continuously as a weekly newspaper in King County, Washington. The
Kent Reporter has been approved as a Legal Newspaper by order of
the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County.
The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues of
the Kent Reporter (and not in supplement form) which was regularly
distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period.The annexed
notice, a:
Public Notice
was published on November 23, 2018 .
The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the
sum of$297.12.
Polly Shepherd
Publisher, Kent Reporter
Subscribed and sworn to me this 23 d day of November, 2018 .
4 J ifer Tril'bet otary Public for the State of Washington, Residing in
Oiling, Washington
i
CITY OF KENT
NOTICE OF ORDINANCES
PASSED BY THE KENT CITY COUNCIL
The following are summaries of ordinances passed by the Kent City Council on
November 20, 2018:
ORDINANCE NO. 4288 - AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent,
Washington, repealing and readopting Chapter 7.02 of the Kent City Code entitled
"Water," to reorganize the chapter and update the Cross-Connection Control
sections to develop and implement procedures to ensure the elimination or control
of cross-connections between a water consumer's system and the City's public water
system and to create additional enforcement provisions allowing for more flexibility.
This ordinance shall take effect and be in force 30 days from and after its passage,
as provided by law.
ORDINANCE NO. 4289 - AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent,
Washington, amending the Kent Comprehensive Plan and its Capital Facilities
Element to Include the Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent, Federal Way, Auburn and
Highline School Districts (CPA-201M).
This ordinance will take effect and be in force 30 days from and after its passage, as
provided by law.
ORDINANCE NO. 4290 - AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent,
Washington, amending Sections 12.13.160 and 12.13.170 of the Kent City Code to
adjust school impact fee schedules and the maximum allowable school impact fees.
This ordinance shall take effect and be in force 30 days from and after its passage,
as provided by law.
ORDINANCE NO. 4291 - AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent,
Washington, amending the Kent Comprehensive Plan and Its Capital Facilities
Element to include the Capital Facilities Plan of the Puget Sound Regional Fire
Authority (CPA-2018-6).
This ordinance shall take effect and be in force 30 days from and after its passage,
as provided by law.
ORDINANCE NO. 4292 - AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent,
Washington, amending the Kent Comprehensive Plan and its Capital Facilities
Element to reflect a six-year plan for capital improvement projects (2019-2024)
(CPA-2017-7).
This ordinance shall take effect and be in force 30 days from and after its passage,
as provided by law.
ORDINANCE NO. 4293 - AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent,
Washington, amending Section 3.18.020, entitled "Certain utilities subject to tax," to
eliminate the sunset of the allocation of certain internal utility taxes to the payment
of debt in the City's other capital projects fund„ and to reallocate the internal utility
taxes to the general fund once the debt in the other capital projects fund is retired.
This ordinance shall take effect and be in force 30 days from the time of passage, as
provided by law.
ORDINANCE NO. 4294 - AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent,
Washington, levying 2018 property taxes for the 2019 biennial budget for the City of
Kent.
This ordinance shall take effect and be in force January 1, 2019, which is more than
five days after its publication, as provided by law.
ORDINANCE NO. 4295 - AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent,
Washington, amending Section 3.28.050 of the Kent City Code, entitled "Imposition
of the tax — Tax or fee levied," to increase gross receipts rates and square footage
tax and establish a gross receipts cap on retailing, and Section 3.28.130 of the Kent
City Code, entitled "Limitation of revenue received," to clarify the allocation of
revenues derived by Chapter 3.28 of the Kent City Code.
This ordinance shall take effect and be in force 30 days from and after its passage,
as provided by law.
ORDINANCE NO. 4296 - AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent,
Washington, relating to budgets and finance and adopting the final 2019-2020
biennial budget.
This ordinance shall take effect and be in force January 1, 2019, which is more than
five days after its publication, as provided by law.
A copy of the complete text of any ordinance will be mailed upon request of the City
Clerk.
Kimberley A. Komoto, City Clerk
Kent Reporter Friday,November 23,2018 19
Leer Notice. Lear Notice. ln¢el recu a Leaned Hotreee Lear Not. Employment raaNneu
Opanat.umtl oice rto°n.oe
L ICFY 20106), rating to budgets and fF NOTICE OF quest a conditional the Chase of Kent Goo-
o RgA4•Eale1R
y W call ante will take once Md ad,,;El the PUBLIC HEARING use permit to construct memo, wad Communlry Careers
It s effe t and he in Some 30 Ilnal 201a2020 bltnnlal CITY OF KENT new perk tedlOkas in OevoYo emem off ce lo- Pam Bap your anal
days from and attar So Nudger. OFFICE OFTHE cludtln a none Van rated t 400 W Gowe
p estate Regard"
peABage, as provided by This ardlnance shall take HEARING EXAMINER DomNs Iabdlr.0 Perk Street In downtown before the market
I.W, effect and be In bme LE CORDON BLAIJ within the M1-Intlusirial Kent For more Informs qee back N
ORDINANCE NO. 42W Jaeamy Y, 2019. whdch� PRELIMINARY Park zoning district In Ilan, please contact Ja Ego bdtlk up.
-AN ORDINANCE of the IS Cam, Tt9n rose days SUBDIVISION comlunctlon with a levee son Gamham Planner,
City Council or Ole CIry bidet Its pOMlCagee, uo A publlc hearing will be and lon halMt Improve- at JGarnham®Kent- We Take Payments
of Kam. Washington, provided by law held to Cpneld°r subdh mant proper Ties pro)eal WAgov or via small P Live Instructed.
ApartApartts ror Ron<br Ron! amencing Sectlpng A Copy of the Complete Wtlltlpp a 4SS RfiCp parpl fe eco ed rotor the at(253)656-54a9. BIUe Emerald Real
Kin¢county 12.13.160 and text aY any ordl,,,"will IMe 22 single Mmly m8I- righV.W bank 0 the N033902 t MATERIA
pcau 12.13,170 of the Kent be mall°tl upon request combat Ids, None land. Green River and along 11/23/18 WANTED Estate School
CI Code to atrust of Ihd Oily Clerk, aborm trade,an. .Ore.- Russell Road between Kin CO:
Scenic Vista school impeet fee achetl Kmm9rf A. Kamoto, them Tract, one South 212th sad 22BIh aNp Won Inr+pvgdve host ern 9
Senior Apartments ales. aq0 the ax mum C rOlera�l stormwerar grad and streets, !'`v"^"r am vNque momlrcl�mg (253)2560402
sn' T04m Awe.BE a@owsbir school Impact 6118,11l23116 three private seems Hearing Data ';d M.>°, %somaoiog9na, Mamove BNxAEg➢S1N%HpdXE6kTg.Mureu Kant,WA 98D30 feds, tracts.Th.property Is Io- WEDNESDAY NOVEM carbon Is a leader on the
Apnmenm Now This ordinary..Shall Ink. NOTICE OF Gated at 26515 108th BER he 2016 at 1000 JV' maskal far-.memo.mry
Avsllebl. An6Ct and rag In Q e,30 APPLICATION Avarw. BE end. Idenn AM ..Nlobivaal hardware t
BesutHul1 62 BRs, days hbm and after its A Pro, Permit ApppII- fled as King County Ae- Hearing Location: Kent The rgmNly-gwnad amn' 1!`
eleNing al: paeaggo,As provldkd by aaTbry tlme Dean filed sasses gqersal nlxmbgr CIry Hell Council Cham- psmy epealailaog In Oilgh
1BR $S98fm°' sw. whit Cdy gP Kgh'I RYfilp• 1M8600020, bars West at 220 4th ' fe ar selsl dad sa.mor. �� &gCtlYlJY
2 BRs $113Nmo. ORDINANCE NO 42�91 bin BAYa1Ctrp FdtlgWtA Hearing O.Io: Avenue 9., Kent, WA
s""a oPasp1w. AN ORDINANCE of Mo is a daaetl Oran of 1 WEDNeSDAY DECEM 98032 nee for doors and win
In...Umlo Appdy`h Day Council at the City oce, TOn 0hd lino pm BER 5, 2010 at 1000 Permit Number pews. Nnsa,ac Dgmgb
Cell Susan or Kws Washlnpton, Cass for reNew.The _ AM C E - 2 0 1 s - 1 had more
tlflen 2S yogre
253-520-9876 amPMtlrin 011e Kent pp�IdCaXEOJI antl�lsttld stutl Hearing Loce\Ion: Kent RPP32101552 Employment wl '6�Iparlpl9Ei M' 6°ndG
Too ]11 CpmprphpnaMp PYan, Ipp maybe rkuKWetl at CIty Hell Council Chem- Th. op OPcntlan. Is manan. ,no ell.I-. a91 riser
p Ma wRi TWp ,pad-
Tnap lmdMapn la an EqueV arV@ w OAryhal V&CIVIi1WY the ottloee °f Kent Plan- DdCa West et 220 4ih gyry%able $of raldaw at /.
opperruniry W+wWlarvad CIMOA l t0 WhOwA Me ping Services, 400 W. Avenue S., Kent, WA the CIry al Kent Eco- CARRIER gunners of Karcher De-
EmpVnyar Capf[el Facilities Plan of Gowe Street,Kent,WA. 98032 around. and Communlry Igo NA Is Iceietl in Anuqu.. ak
she Puget Sound As DATE OF NOTICE OF Permit: SU-2017.6, OWTlapmeol 'pens, I.- ROUTES Takwlla WA, south of conectuble.
bel Floe Andel APPLICATION: Novem- KIVA#RPP3-21]4909 caged at 400 W Gave AVAILABLE SeaOle. ANTIQUE SHIPPING
PA-2018-M. bsr23,2018 The application Is Street In downtown TRIe:Material Handler CONTAINER from Eng-
Iaa Oadlnanc.Shell 160 APPLICATION NAME read bi. for myiew At Kent- For more Inform. Locallon:Tukwlle,WA land; sldeboerds, desks,
` effrsd and be in rates 30 THUERINGER SHORT the CIry of Kent Ed.- than, pI'M con'uo Ja IN YOUR Sort Weekdays 12pm- chinas, bookcas-
days Own aad afl he PLAT n01de end Community Sam Gamble., Plane.,,, AREA 4pm essrealls. 40 pp1.. an
Poases,as provided by APPLICATION NUM- DOWISTmi office, lo- at(253)856-5439 or vie Job tied:peit4tlimg sale this weekpntl, FrI-
.a. BER:GP-204Bg2!KIVA cetetl 400 W Gowe small MYnaq Oara :Immediate tldy through Bgnday
ORDINANCE NQ. 4292 dgpSS-2t84640 Sirceg In downl0wn tt��aanAmm•komwn gqu Call Today Qom Boost wage..
ldt -AN ORDINANCE ad the ENV-2AiB 21 / KIVA Kent For more Ibforme- Thim ad err ppOblfeagpm y eaerAl JbDdemo Ylon Shahan,360G6e-g3e,
ItEl
dir
City COUmog gl the CIry MRrjiM2164645 than, please rennin an Navntrmor Z3,2018. '.1-253-872-6610 www cobsgreeLcam
.SDI play?ago RUVSIvarg
al Kea,. Weahlxlglon, PROJECT DESCRIP- Sharon Clamp, Plennae kB33615 -Older PlSklflr
Amdmdhrpl iho M°a% TION:The appllerat pro- nCBGemp• NOTICE OF PUBLIC .Wareham OaparcD6- APpil.....
Ann°unpemente Completions" Plan pages to ..No Nb 0. KgmlWAggw ar wa HEARING CRY OF Ileh Red Calgle9ll�Ypp
and Rs Capitalrot ed aups. NdsTYq reslddlUtA item f253)65 5438 KENTOFFICE OFTHE q. d' -Qh th0 VVeb training wllll NEW APPLIANCES
Alcoholics Anonymous Element 1q falRabl A gl%- IN Mare tl94gIDpVnGf11 Ad ten puDlfnalon In HEARING EXAMINER be prouEdod FmoriNal UP TO 70%OFF
Ygdl PI00 rat CgpBa Ifni- ore a lot line adduslment Kant Rapoxbr on KENTTOWNXOMES
for Information 8 year
plant pre adA and subsequentlyeW nkVWs. All Menul.cWmr Small
meetingtimes call j sul i- it20F201 a. REZONE PERMIT -Current drivers license Ding's,Dents,Scratches
2088]2B3B 2 0 1 9 - 2 0 2 4 1 Male the maMng per. K833B9s A publlc adding will be do good standing and Factory Imp°rfec-
CPA20Y7-7). Mng of the 29.acao Site hard to g.harder a re II IIIIII II .Siang computer skills bons
Please vlsl...lcg his diamonds shell take Into 9 single family real- NOTICE RING IC zone of a 1 acre amel fyl yNl Waal+viol Vsw p
www.eeeHleee erg effect and be in Some 30 dentlal Iota. A critical HEARING p +� .T !„' 75 My be able to IIX up to Far herard.g.per r i
P"R""'RO lsff YOUR IT-' days fee, and no, Its areas Irad,a stormwarm CRY. KENT 91om CC. Community f 4fs
GIONAL EVENT rota- pFood, es provided by detention facility tract, OFFICE OFTHE GgmmOtelAl Yorthgg tb �Wamhouse expos once Appliance Dlsirlbutars
wide ALscit a$325 class- law. M HEARING EXAMINER ea MalilEemny apluPr of mred,se 14639Tukwlla all,Bud.
owe parimofer dradscopo SHORELINE RdsldkmAl TOWANovse -NN�HiI) to bVltl.excel. 206-264.6%6
Ihd Motor or$1575 for ORDINANCE NO. 4293 heaa, and a pVWato CONDITIONAL USE aiming• ThO pYo-poagd � {Apt Cuaterngaserufce
n display ad Cell this -AN ORDINANCE of the areal accessed from PERMIT zoning dollg¢nalPoo Ie -Ogramzaion antl often- APPLIANCE
newspaper or 360344- Gyr GOunCII 01'rite Cloy 116th Avenue SE are LOWER RUSSELL CbhalEiem wnll this GIVE flan to detail
2938 for damage of Men1, SAWNnglgn, also being proposed as LEVEE SETBACK- Compmlmnslve PMn ���� -Able to read, write, and PACKAGE
WASHINGTON DI- amondNng Saellpm part of this tlevelopment VAN DOREN'S"No- Le Us.Plan Map de°- IY// ql" + 't. eommwnPtaio oMaellvely $1499
VORCE-SEPARATION, 31a 020, entOled PROJECT LOCATION'. ING PARK InoTom sP MTI, Mixed t ashrobt.amthofob Himaggeaaaar,Range&
$155. $175 with CAI Certaln mlllti.s aabout 21252116th Avenue BE � Olphylasher
ore._ NO COURT AP to sax" to aluminum the Kin County RELOCATION gg.The .ppl pgM dub
sunset of the allocation 0 0 Pamela A public hearing will be anUlotl a Mul{OAmBy Do /� ehreer®Partner-East n.cgm rN°w UnComattliWaDrorOalnty'
PEARANCES. Includes numbered 0922059007 held to consider fl epn Review Wppllcatwo ,� __ S 6 propery, bills, custody of pwrtelM inteymsl Mlllry B 0922059046 Zpnlnp_ Shemll toay, Conti t M F D R-2 0 77 7-B 1 /i, ` 2N-2 N
uupppognl Cameroon prop- mard. to pip p4lpmem of SRO, single family res Use Permit to construct HPDR.2173266) for a / Find your peABcl pet
.= of documi"i debt In the We other dermal 2/i. in the Classifieds. cemetery rest.
Legal AOprnmoves, $43- ost projects fund. OTHER PERMITS AND of newt lloodwald and le 1.4 st valb nmun for ltheasgA on
/�// w+Q,hprMalwaamWr.mm�
]arse-5295 ,peer and to rO.laAte the in PIANS WHICH MAY BE ea i,abll°ms along the August18,2017, Pl �a - COMMON plate for Salk.
legalalt rnatives.com Trans[ MII%y ipxna.10 the REQUIRED'. Glvll Con NpptlYO Dale UUII AdwgNlse your MCgamin VIEW Gkmo-
eneral fund Oman the east Dank of InO Green DECEM- Pipes Side g sEQUIR Permit Final m two
River between South WEDN.GORY. CMmin era a sale ry by
Leda.Neese. dam,In iNa alias tnpiinl Short Plat, Building Pet- BER 5, 2016 at 11:00 h Wn g g g sl6tl bar dead Cx{4pIaM.
rbfsuralumd la Tell,. mils 2121h ad South 22Bgh AM In your local community location. $4.500, Call
CITY OF KENT iipp Streets.one product s f
eftectgaad bbe In tere.30 PUBLIC COMMENT PE Ipep\pd along the Hearing Location: ""' newspaper and onllne 62357D 4040
NOTICE OF RICO: November 23, City
ORDINANCES days from the time .f 2018 io December 7, CoU. ass bank of Sirs KpmQ nts Nall Council "" i ibmgahlh;In Va.,of Gatl.nOilcOdl rr„
PASSED SCYTHE KENT Aeaage,as provided by 2016 All Crean ROyor end along CmambArs Wp61 ag 220 4 y A (ni r
CRY COUNCIL IpgW persons may Russell Head belwersn in Avenue S. Kent, WA u ^ dbeUspNq{$s In our arse, rid Ark to YCW,
ORDINANCE NO. 4294 comment on this eppli- South 212th and 22Bth 9BO32 p0 engne to contained ad %
The following are sum Ilan Comments must Streets. Permit: ZCA-201E-3 / and stand deal. ^
manes of eminences AN ORDINANCE of the be writing and re Hearin Data RPP3 2103225 r pYWWspdndGaWRaiW.bpn
° 9 - 1 Ill 11 Caul a6B.9aB.2sR7 to
peastd by the Kent City city council of the CIry Ieed In the Kent Plan WEDNESDAY. NOVEM- Tlvo appGgm4ea Is , OV.` CaN,Ra00.e69.252T find out how,
Combat en November nQ K.n[, Washington, Ins Department by 430 BER 26, 2018 at 10:00 mayalabie Mr rgMew at PmC;'9fl{0$tl&BODU'
Zen 2016: Isrying 2018 plopAl'y P.M. Friday, December --
ORDINANCE MO. 42N W"foe rise 2019 blab- ],2018 at 220 sigh Ave- AM _
Fad CRDINANCE gT the alad budge for the CIty, sue SONh Kent Wq Hearing Location: Kent • e -
City COunall ./ gib° City pl Kam 98032.For questions re Cary Hal Council Chain _
This coastal shay lake hers Wast at 220 4fh agynad ddn
m King Waehingd.o, rat planes
this Pasca[ Avenue S., Kant, WA Featured dos t on
ptlA9Yng and madopiMg etlpat and be I. trade Grant contact Japan SBU32 MmlwgNeeoe
Chaim,7.02.1 In.hound JAbeay / 2gt9. wmNam Garnham AIGP Samar permit Number. DRIVER(CLASS B) (Everett,WA)
CIty Cado gnlllNd la mprp MaA IMq Jaya Planher, at (25a) 656 SMC 20181, RPP3- Iwh Yln
Zeds„" %b rpOT.61zo After m PeW"tJen. as Sd39,igaraham0' 2181563 I`"1P
the chAptkl and update pros W Wl wwO 4296 konpwa9Cv Sound Puhlishing, Inc. Is looking for an ate„
C F� The application u
1f„e roae•GgnnoeOen TENTA su MEETING: avellable far homes at OuM nerve Noe ns��pu„wrcamr
Control sections to tle- "AN ORDINANCE of tit. q puNNs.rmaltnp Is TEN- the CIry of Kent Ed. eMperlFBeed truck driver with a CEEB t0 drive dribsdrc r3 I,
veiop and Implement CIry C"bdlI el rah. Cly TATIVELY aeyeadolad for rtbe'do and Community xx"+
procedures to ensure amen W' Wea rerlrem, 10'00 am on Thumday, Gpy,aoponamt dike, Ia- oldr OfillOe Flelddred In EVerettr WA.Musthave -vemoloo
the ellmhnatlore ar control g 6nt4Vba February tat,Zeno, The caietl at 400 W Down .ol nlsaloerrmn.e
of cross connections bars- 3.2B.oso of the Kam Clty pabug m.Wmg wnl. Nat S.edt b row Down excellent driving record,be ahletch lift501bs and
iween a water Cotle, enTTotl held In the Esonbmla Kent. Form a informs- tfep"r
consumers system and Impasttiom of the tax - and Community Devsb °f foad)gurto dtruck. koelkraampnmr
the CIry's public water Tex or fee levied,"to In- cement Conference Ton, please contact Ja- -m,a'.
System end to create ad- ttgsae grow recplple Room at 400 West son Gernhem, Planner, nVireninegivilhOppernurisher
N msaa.rNl
cft69 and square bat- Gowe Streeg, Kent, WA at(253) 856-5439 or via IThls position Is On the night shift 'starfing .
olatonol pn90rapmar pm age tan and establish a ail atith mtswne we
wlelpma alNmwing rat more gross meccas cep an to 99032. Please be ad i arnham•kmorge,ppare, 'apprrptmal ly 9 pm) and Is ELII-Tlrge, 3738 'N°°nP1
nmiumy rolling, Seim Section els" 'Gilt mtlggAg dale his ad for ppublicmpn -oriental.
This andbeashaiis30 m sgbhlm W bbange on Nog.rogr 23,2016. hours per week.The sdiedu 0 wries and requires roue
efhia and be In fires 30 3.7.9.Q30 0l the Ken{City PpgagA car tle of lime p B336U6 A 4 seem,
days from and after Its Code„ entltirsd'LiMbalOn and data a least a weekknowledge
.eveorgmn[opyfenoo
usage, es provided by Of revenue received," to before the scheduled NOTICEOFPUBLIC tle%Ihl ley, MUst have kngW edge Of the Puget -rther,
f . clarify the allocation of eating.If yo.bay.any HEARING .-Essoma-n
ORDINANCE NO. 4269 neaenuaw derived by quSmlobs, phbasg call CITY OF KENTal IN Sgundarea.MustprgvidemrrentcgpyofdrlvingSage"„,
-AN ORDINANCE of In. Glvap'ar 328 scral of the Kent al_a-0 Gernhem, Kant OFFICE OFTHE 'fl ,grzalluri a-me,
ack.
Gly Co.,.,, at the Goy City Code. Planning Services, at HEARING EXAMINER abstract at time of interview, -vamonaleoe
omaadlmg meof PAUL khdnp tlnl effect and basins Same 30 j N3ppp y,apNyp,ppy CONDITIONAL PERMIT USE k rAPol,n„a,Npf
CorrpdaOnnsNe dam days form and after Its Z COPY - ir LOWER RUSSELL Pleaseemailapplication tg: an�gn
ost
and 0s Capital FacUYWkS P .. a provided by Far camp.,
P nsae a 23 F8Wq, Ngvemnyer AN DOR E 's LAN a ■^\■esla, p n,can
Camnal a Include ns esv 2$4604 VAN ING PAS LAND eFTI■ta'�■ ■I tareClsadSe910dp Sit 0 and be sure t0 ql rout
of the
Peen, s Plans ORDINANCE NO 42he 4B34B04 RELOCATION
■ Y include ATTR:IIRIVER In the suhect one. im rrca'iwwa.rvnrwrw
of the Kent, Federal AN ORDINANCE of the RELOCATION PUB I$n INO N� I
Way, AubUQb and rHigheed, of Council of Thu Gory Find
se It,Buy it,Sell II l public Naflog,Side, will be current
Gdna SCheol Dlstrlets of Kgnl, Washington, re- ew.sxeKl..mr.... held to consldur the re for llftof our mos[mnengjob openings and blearn more about usvlslt car webslte:wwws.undpubllshing.mm