Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout4264 Ordinance o . 4264 (Appealing or Repealing Ordinances) Passed - 12/12/2017 Amends the Kent Comprehensive Plan and its Capital Facilities Element to include the Capital Facilities Plans of Kent, Federal Way, Auburn and Highline School Districts ORDINANCE NO', 4 AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, amending the Kent Comprehensive Plan and its Capital Facilities Element to include the Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent, Federal Way, Auburn and Highline School Districts (CPA-2017-2). RECITALS A. The State of Washington Growth Management Act (GMA) requires internal consistency among comprehensive plan elements and the plans from other jurisdictions. B. To assure that comprehensive plans remain relevant and up to date, the GMA allows amendments to the capital facilities element of comprehensive plans concurrently with the adoption or amendment of a city budget. RCW 36.70A.130(2)(a)(iv). C. The City of Kent has established procedures for amending the Comprehensive Plan in Chapter 12.02 of the Kent City Code (KCC), allowing amendment of the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan concurrently with the adoption or amendment of the City budget and allowing the City Council to hold the public hearing instead of the Land Use and Planning Board. KCC 12.02.010. 1 Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2017118 — 2022123 School Dist. Capital Facilities Plans D. The Kent, Federal Way, Auburn and Highline School Districts have submitted proposed amendments to their Capital Facilities Plans to be included in an amendment of the City's Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan. E. After providing appropriate public notice, the City Council of the City of Kent considered the requested Comprehensive Plan amendment and held a public hearing on the same on October 17, 2017. F. On October 3, 2017, the City provided the required 60 day notification under RCW 36.70A.106 to the State of Washington of the City's proposed amendment to the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan. The 60 day notice period has passed, and by operation of law, it is deemed approved. G. On December 12, 2017, the City Council of the City of Kent approved the Capital Facilities Element amendment CPA-2017-2 to include the Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent, Federal Way, Auburn and Highline School Districts, as set forth in Exhibit "A" attached and incorporated by this reference. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: ORDINANCE SECTION 1. - Amendment. The Kent Comprehensive Plan, and its Capital Facilities Element, are amended to include the Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent, Federal Way, Auburn and Highline School Districts, as set forth in Exhibit "A" attached and incorporated by this reference (CPA- 2017-2). 2 Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2017118 - 2022123 School Dist. Capital Facilities Plans SECTION 2. - Corrections by City Clerk or Code Reviser, Upon approval of the city attorney, the city clerk and the code reviser are authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance, including the correction of clerical errors; ordinance, section, or subsection numbering; or references to other local, state, or federal laws, codes, rules, or regulations. SECTION 3. - Severabilitv. If any one or more section, subsection, or sentence of this ordinance is held to be unconstitutional or invalid, that decision will not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 4. - Effective Date. This ordinance will take effect and be Iin force 30 days from and after its passage, as provided by law. SrE OKE, MAYOR Date Ap rove l ATTEST: KIMBERLEY A.(lJOMOTO, CITY CLERK Date Adopted m2 ls( �-i Date Published' APPROVED AS TO FORM: I �a I I��,�I 14, TOA BRUBAKER, CITY A" ORNEY P:\Civil\Ordinance\CompPl a nAmend-Schoo l OistCapitalFaci l it iesPlans-2019-2023.docx 3 Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2017118 - 2022123 School Dist. Capital Facilities Plans EXHIBIT A School U-1strict, vi ar a Dim Plan 017- 0.t - ton- .0 r � KENT : SCHOOL DISTRICT April 20.17 Kent School District SIX YEAR CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2017-2018 -- 2022-2023 April 2017 Kent School District No.415 12033 SE 2561h Street Kent,Washington 96030-6643 (253)373-7295 !�twltctc��.j DISTRICT BOARD of DIRECTORS Ms. Karen DeBruler, President Ms. Maya Vengadasalam, Vice President Ms. Agda Burchard, Legislative Representative Mr. Russ Hanscom, Director Ms. Deborah Straus, Director ADMINISTRATION Dr. Calvin J. Watts Superintendent of Schools Mr. Michael Newman, Chief Business Officer Mr. Ralph Fortunato, Executive Director of Fiscal Services Mr. Fred Long, Executive Director of Facilities Services Kent School Distdct%x-Year Capital Facllitles Plan April 2017 Kent Sc�ho'o',,l District SiX Year Capital Facilities (Plan Table of Contents Section Page Number I Executive Summary 2 I I Six-Year Enrollment Projection & History 4 III District Standard of Service 9 I V Inventory, Capacity & Maps of Existing Schools 12 V Six-Year Planning & Construction Plan —Site Map 17 V I Portable Classrooms 20 VII Projected Classroom Capacity 21 VIII Finance Plan, Cost Basis and Impact Fee Schedules 26 I X Summary of Changes to Previous Plan 33 X Appendixes 35 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Faciillles Plan April 2017 1 I Executive Summary This Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") has been prepared by the Kent School District (the "District") as the organization's capital facilities planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act, King County Code K.C.C. 21A.43 and Cities of Kent, Covington, Renton, Auburn, Black Diamond, Maple Valley, and SeaTac. This annual Plan update was prepared using data available in the spring of 2017 for the 2D16-2017 schoolyear. This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the Kent School District. This Plan is not intended to be the sole planning document for all of the District's needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic Long Range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board Policies, taking into account a longer or shorter time period, other factors and trends in the use of facilities, and other needs of the District as may be required. Prior Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent School District have been adopted by Metropolitan King County Council and Cities of Kent, Covington, Auburn and Renton and included in the Capital Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. This Plan has also been submitted to cities of Black Diamond, Maple Valley, and SeaTac for their information and inclusion in their Comprehensive Plans. In order for impact fees to be collected in the unincorporated areas of Kent School District, the Metropolitan King County Council must adopt this Plan and a fee- implementing ordinance for the District. For impact fees to be collected in the incorporated portions of the District, the cities of Kent, Covington, Renton and Auburn must also adopt this Plan and their own school impact fee ordinances. This Capital Facilities Plan establishes a standard of service in order to ascertain current and future capacity. While the State Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines do not account for local program needs in the District. The Growth Management Act, King County and City codes and ordinances authorize the District to make adjustments to the standard of service based on specific needs for students of the District. This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. Program capacity is based on an average capacity and updated to reflect changes to special programs served in each building. Portables in the capacity calculation use the same standard of service as the permanent facilities. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2017 2 The capacity of each school in the District is calculated based on the District's standard of service and the existing inventory of permanent facilities. The District's program capacity of permanent facilities reflects program changes and the state's mandated reduction of class size to meet the standard of service for Kent School District. Portables provide additional transitional capacity. Kent School District is the fifth largest (fte basis) district in the state. Enrollment is electronically reported monthly to the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction ("OSPI") on Form P-223. Although funding apportionment is based on Annual Average Full Time Equivalent(AAFTE), enrollment on October 1 is a widely recognized "snapshot in time"that is used to report the District's enrollment for the year as reported to OSPI. The District received authorization from the Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction to temporarily re-open the former Kent Elementary School at 317 Fourth Ave South in Kent. This facility will be used to house the kindergarten and early child education classes for both Kent and Neely-O'Brien Elementary Schools to alleviate overcrowding at those schools.This building re-opened in fall 2014 as the Kent Valley Early Learning Center. The District's standard of service, enrollment history and projections, and use of transitional facilities are reviewed in detail in various sections of this Plan. The District plans to continue to satisfy concurrency requirements through the transitional use of portables. A financing plan is included in Section VIII which demonstrates the District's ability to implement this Plan. Pursuant to the requirements of the Growth Management Act, this Plan will be updated annually with changes in the impact fee schedules adjusted accordingly. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2017 3 I I Six -Year Enrollment Projection For capital facilities planning, enrollment growth projections are based on cohort survival and student yield from documented residential construction projected over the next six years. (see Table 2,page 8 andmap page 37). The student generation factor is the basis for the growth projections from new developments. (see page 5) King County live births and the District's relational percentage average were used to determine the number of kindergartners entering the system. (See Table 1, page 7) 8,19% of 25,032 King County live births in 2012 is projected for 2,050 students expected in Kindergarten for October 1, 2017. This is an increase of 402 live births in King County over the previous year. (See Table 2,page a) Early Childhood Education students (also identified as "ECE"), "Early Childhood Special Education ("ECSE") students are forecast and reported to OSPI separately on Form P-223H for Special Education Enrollment. Capacity is reserved to serve students in the ECE programs at elementary schools. The first grade population of Kent School District is traditionally 1-3% larger than the kindergarten population due to growth and transfers to the District. Cohort survival method uses historical enrollment data to forecast the number of students projected for the following year. Projections for October 1, 2017-2022 are from OSPI Report 1049 — Determination of Projected Enrollments. Within practical limits, the District has kept abreast of proposed developments. The District will continue to track new development activity to determine impact to schools. Information on new residential developments and the completion of these proposed developments in all jurisdictions will be considered in the District's future analysis of growth projections. rsaamap page 31) The Kent School District serves eight permitting jurisdictions: unincorporated King County, the cities of Kent, Covington, Renton, and Auburn and smaller portions of the cities of SeaTac, Black Diamond, and Maple Valley Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2017 4 STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR "Student Factor" is defined by King County code as 'the number derived by a school district to describe how many students of each grade span are expected to be generated by a dwelling unit'based on district records of average actual student generated rates for developments completed within the last ten years. Following these guidelines, the student generation rate for Kent School District is as follows: Single Family Elementary .398 Middle School .096 Senior High .185 Total 679 Multi-Family Elementary .117 Middle School .028 Senior High .029 Total .174 The student generation factor is based on a survey of 2,757 single-family dwelling units and 1,831 multi-family dwelling units with no adjustment for occupancy rates. Please refer to Appendix D on Page 37 of the Capital Facilities Plan for details of the Student Generation Factor survey. In preparing the 2017-2018 to 2022-2023 Capital Facilities Plan the District contracted with Davis Demographics and Planning (DDP) of Riverside California, a noted expert in demographic studies for school districts, to analyze and prepare the student generation factor. DDP used a larger sample of single family residences than the district did in previous plans and included both "garden" and "urban style" apartments in the calculation for multi-family residences. Urban style apartments typically have four stories, a central lobby and entrance, elevator access to all floors and have a central corridor with apartments on each side. These apartments have little or no surface street parking,with parking located beneath the building; retail may or may not be included with the building. If there is retail it will generally be located on the first floor. These apartments seldom have swimming pools and do not have playgrounds for children. Kent School District Slx-Year Capital Facilities Plan Apnl 2017 5 Garden style apartments will have very little studio apartments and will have more three bedroom apartments then the urban style and in theory generate more students enrolled in school. These apartments will also have lawns, club houses, swimming pools and places for children to play. The District felt that it is important to include both styles of apartments for the student generation factor. Though it is anticipated that few students will come from the urban style, they are now part of the mix in Kent and thus should be included in mix of multi-family housing units. Within the district's boarders there are several low-income and multi-family housing projects coming on-line during 2017-2018. Once developed and occupancy occurring the District does recognize that the student generation for multi-family housing will likely increase for the 2018 Capital Facilities Plan. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2017 6 r `o N L Q UJ O e M A M N N M N N Ol IA O m co 0 n c N N m N N N N N N � N (V N N � N E v L W M 1[) m N N 6 y O m M 0 m O r m N W N N N N N N N N ry N m N g O m OOi Cni m N N O m N u) O r r m m a Z m N N m' N N N N N N N N N N N E 111 e w N N o a O o m N m O r v N m o r ro n o rI 7 o m o c O m In r J m N H z m m N mr• ON NO OZ z - O p m OC W N N N m N J Y_C A a V Z N m aO10 m 1D ro N r n o m c N ICI m r J J O m N N � m m N T N m N N N N N m N N Y p t ❑ Q O m y o m m N N m N m M V OI V O mY If) N M O m m O M om w m a v u Q O7 7l0 T QI O 0I O O R N O m N m U J W m N N N N N N N N N N N c •9qc� H c m M O m m n N n n n Q r m O M m m m m o a 0 0 O N LO 04 m a Zi 'qcI O cI m m O N Om m m LmO O O WW N p Nd CL _Y C N LL pC W K $ O M m ` O O O O N d W co y N y L p m E —0 p O m 2 2 u a N M V In m n m o m n m E cm v a u m m c m m > J U E °� u U c 2 m o c m m m @ m @ m m m m m T F m- E F v w U o Y 4 Y (7 (9 0 0 () 0 (9 (9 (9 (9 (9 0 m a m U m` u x y 5 0 0 0 W m Y 7 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.415 SIX-YEAR ENROLLMENT PROJECTION Full Day Kmolargartan at all Elem LB In 2010 LB in 2011 LB in 2012 LB In 2013 LB in 2014 LB.Est.2015 LB Est 2015 ACTUAL P R O 1 E C_ T 1 O _ N October 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022� King County Live Births' 24.630 25,032 24,910 25,348 24,975 24,926 24,677 ' Increase I Decrease 0 402 -122 438 -373 .49 .49 Kindergarten I Birth % 2 8.17% 6.19% 8.21% 8.06% 8,16% 8,16% E16% FD Kindergarten @ 1.0 2013 2,050 2,046 2,042 2,038 2,034 2,030 Grade 1 2067 2,043 2,081 2,077 2.073 2,069 2,065 Grade 2 2163 2,092 2,06E 2,107 2,103 2,098 2,094 Grade 3 2195 2,188 2,116 2,092 2,131 2,127 2,122 Grade 4 2195 2,215 2,208 2,135 2,111 2,150 2,146 Grade 5 2103 2,210 2,230 2,223 2,150 2,126 2,165 Grade 6 1952 2.112 2,219 2,239 2,232 2,159 2,135 Grade 7 2021 1,944 2,104 2,210 2,230 2,223 2,151 Grade 8 2021 2,042 1,964 2,125 2,233 2,253 2,246 Grade 9 2105 2,214 2,236 2,150 2,326 2,445 2,467 Grade 10 2099 1,869 1,966 1,965 1,909 2,065 2,171 Grade 11 1865 1,819 1,620 1.704 1,720 1,655 1,790 Grade 12 1730 1,634 1,594 1,420 1,493 1.507 1,450 Total Enrollment Projection a 26,529 26,432 26,452 26,509 26,749 26.911 27,032 Yearly Increase/Decrease 3 -97 20 57 240 162 121 Yearly IncreasefDecrease% -0.37% 0.08% 0.22% 0.91% 0.61% 0.45% Total Enrollment Projection 1 26,529 26,432 26,452 26,509 26,749 26,911 27,032 1 Kindergarten enrollment projection for 2017 is based on Kent SD percentage of live births in King County five years previous. Live births for King County are estimates for years 2020-2022. 2 Kindergarten projection is calculated by using the District's previous year percentage of King County births five years earlier compared to actual kindergarten enrollment in the previous year.(Excludes ELSE-Early Childhood Special Education preschoolers) 3 Headcount Projections for 2017-2022 from OSPI Report 1049-Determination of Projected Enrollments 4 Oct.2016 P223 Headcount is 26,532&FTE 26,190.15.Full Headcount vdlh ECE Preschool&Running Start students=28,089 G R O W T H P R O J E C T 1 O N S - Adjustments for current economic factors For facilities planning purposes, this six-year enrollment projection anticipates conservative enrollment growth from new development currently in some phase of planning or construction in the district Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 2 Ap612017 8 I I I Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" In order to determine the capacity of facilities in a school district, King County Code 21A.06 references a "standard of service" that each school district must establish in order to ascertain its overall capacity. The standard of service identifies the program year, the class size, the number of classrooms, students and programs of special need,and other factors determined by the district which would best serve the student population. This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. The District has identified schools with significant special needs programs as "impact" schools and the standard of service targets a lower class size at those facilities. Portables included in the capacity calculation use the same standard of service as the permanent facilities. (See Appendix A, 8 & C) The standard of service defined herein will continue to evolve in the future. Kent School District is continuing a long-term strategic planning process combined with review of changes to capacity and standard of service. This process will affect various aspects of the District's standard of service and future changes will be reflected in future capital facilities plans. Current Standards of Service for Elementary Students Class size for Kindergarten is planned for an average of 23 or fewer students. Class size for grades 1 - 3 is planned for an average of 23 or fewer students. Class size for grades 4 - 6 is planned for an average of 27 or fewer students. Class size for Kindergarten and grades 1, 2 and 3 for schools that qualify for high poverty funding (14 elementary schools for 2017-18) is planned for an average of 17 or fewer students. Some special programs require specialized classroom space and the program capacity of some of the buildings housing these programs is reduced. Some students, for example, leave their regular classroom for a short period of time to receive instruction in special programs and space must be allocated to serve these programs. Some students have scheduled time in a computer lab, Students may also be provided music instruction and physical education in a separate classroom or facility. Some identified students will also be provided educational opportunities in classrooms for special programs such as those designated as follows: English Language Learners (E L L) Education for Disadvantaged Students (Title I) — Federal Program Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2017 9 Learning Assisted Programs (LAP) — State Program Highly Capable Students-State Program Reading, Math or Science Labs Dual Language Programs in 4 elementary schools Inclusive Education Service for Elementary and Secondary students with disabilities may be provided in a separate or self-contained classroom sometimes with a capacity of 10-15 depending on the program: Early Childhood Special Education (ECSE) -3-4 yr. old students with disabilities Tiered Intervention in Inclusive Education Support Center Programs Integrated Programs & Resource Rooms (for special remedial assistance) Self-contained Inclusive Education Support Center Programs (SC) School Adjustment Programs for students with behavioral disorders (SA) Adaptive Support Center for Mild, Moderate & Severe Disabilities (ASCDO) Speech & Language Therapy & Programs for Hearing Impaired students Occupational & Physical Therapy Programs (OT/PT) The Outreach Program (TOP) for 18-21 year old secondary students Some newer buildings have been constructed to accommodate most of these programs; some older buildings have been modified, and in some circumstances, these modifications reduce the classroom capacity of the buildings. When programs change, program capacity is updated to reflect the change in program and capacity. Current Standards of Service for Secondary Students The standards of service outlined below reflect only those programs and educational opportunities provided to secondary students which directly affect the capacity of the school buildings. Class size for grades 7 —8 is planned for an average of 28.6 or fewer students. Class size for grades 9— 12 is planned for an average of 30.6 or fewer students. Similar to Inclusive Education Programs listed above, many other secondary programs require specialized classroom space which can reduce the program capacity of the permanent school buildings. Identified secondary students will also be provided other educational opportunities in classrooms for programs designated as follows: Computer, Multi-Media &Technology Labs & Programs Technology Academy at Kent-Meridian High School & Mill Creek Middle School Science Programs & Labs — Biology, Chemistry, Physics, Oceanography, Astronomy, Meteorology, Marine Biology, General Science, etc. English Language Learners (E L L) Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2017 10 i Music Programs—Band, Orchestra, Chorus, Jazz Band, etc. Art Programs —Painting, Design, Drawing, Ceramics, Pottery, Photography, etc. Theater Arts— Drama, Stage Tech, etc. Journalism and Yearbook Classes Highly Capable (Honors or Gifted) and Advanced Placement Programs International Baccalaureate ("IB") Program JROTC -Junior Reserve Officers Training Corps Career&Technical Education Programs (CTE -Vocational Education) Family & Consumer Science — Culinary Arts, Sewing, Careers w/Children/Educ., etc. Child Development Preschool and Daycare Programs Health & Human Services —Sports Medicine, Sign Language, Cosmetology, etc. Business Education —Word Processing, Accounting, Business Law & Math, Marketing, Economics, Web Design, DECA, FBLA (Future Business Leaders). Technical & Industry—Woodworking, Cabinet Making, Building Trades, Metals, Automotive & Manufacturing Technology, Welding, Drafting, Drawing, CAD (Computer-aided Design), Electronics, Engineering & Design, Aviation, ASL, etc. Graphic & Commercial Arts, Media, Photography, Theater & Stage, Ag & Horticulture. Kent Phoenix Academy- Performance Learning Center, Gateway, Virtual High School and Kent Success programs Space or Classroom Utilization, As a result of scheduling conflicts for student programs, the need for specialized rooms for certain programs, and the need for teachers to have a work space during their planning periods, it is not possible to achieve 100% utilization of regular teaching stations at secondary schools. Based on the analysis of actual utilization of classrooms, the District has determined that the standard utilization rate is 85% for secondary schools. Program capacity at elementary schools reflects 100% utilization at the elementary level. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2017 11 I V Inventory and Capacity of Existing Schools Currently, the District has permanent program capacity to house 27,103 students and transitional (portable) capacity to house 2,085. This capacity is based on the District's Standard of Service as set forth in Section I 11. Included in this Plan is an inventory of the District's schools by type, address and current capacity. (See Table 3 on Page 13). The ratio between permanent capacity and portable capacity is 94.9%-5.1%. The program capacity is periodically updated for changes in programs, additional classrooms and new schools. Program capacity has been updated in this Plan to reflect program changes implemented in the Fall of 2015. For the 2015-2016 school year and beyond the state has a mandated lower class size in 14 elementary schools that are classified as high poverty. The new class size in grades K-1, 2 and 3 will be 17 students for every teacher. Calculation of Elementary, Middle School and Senior High School capacities are set forth in Appendices A, B and C. Maps of existing schools are included on Pages 14-16. For clarification, the following is a brief description of some of the non-traditional programs for students in Kent School District: Kent Mountain View Academy serves Grades 3 — 12 with transition, choice and home school assistance programs. It is located in the former Grandview School in the western part of the district in Des Moines. This school was originally designed as an elementary school and is included in the elementary capacity for this Plan. Kent Phoenix Academy is a non-traditional high school opened in fall 2007 in the renovated site and building that formerly served Sequoia Middle School. Kent Phoenix Academy has four special programs including the Performance Learning Center, Gateway, Virtual High School and Kent Success. iGrad- In partnership with Green River College, Kent School District has pioneered the Individualized Graduation and Degree Program or "iGrad". iGrad offers a second chance to students age 16-21 who have dropped out of high school and want to earn a high school diploma. iGrad is not included in this Capital Facilities Plan because it is served in leased space at the Kent Hill Plaza Shopping Center. Over the past three years, enrollment in the iGrad program has averaged over 300 students. Kent Schocl District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2017 12 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.415 INVENTORY and CAPACITY of EXISTING SCHOOLS Year SCHOOL opened qBR ADDRESS I Program Capacity Camiage Crest Elementary 1990 CC 18235-1401h Avenue BE, Renton 98058 428 Cedar Valley Elementary 1971 CV 26500 Timberland Way BE, Covington 98042 360 Covington Elementary 1961 CO 17070 SE Wax Road, Covington 98042 478 Crestwood Elementary 1980 CW 25225-1801h Avenue BE. Covington 98042 406 East H81 Elementary 1953 EH 9825 S 240th Street, Kent 98031 464 Emerald Park 1999 EP 11800 SE 216th Street, Kent 98031 477 Fainvood Elementary 1969 FW 16600-148th Avenue BE, Renton 98058 386 George T.Daniel Elementary 1992 DE 11310 SE 2481h Street, Kent 98030 432 Glenridge Elementary 1996 GR 19405-120th Avenue BE,Renton 96058 431 Gress Lake Elementary 1971 GL 28700-191st Place BE. Kent 9BO42 42B Horizon Elementary 1990 HE 27641-144th Avenue BE, Kent 98D42 477 Jenkins Creek Elementary 1987 JC 26915-1861h Avenue BE. Covington 98042 384 Kent Elementary 1999 KE 24700-6411h Avenue South, Kent 98032 454 Kent Valley Early Learning Center 2014 KV 317—4th Ave S,Kent,WA 98032 318 Lake Youngs Elementary 1965 LY 19660-142nd Avenue BE, Kent 9BO42 497 Martin Sortun Elementary 1987 ME 12711 BE 248th Street, Kent 98030 455 Meadow Riede Elementary 1994 MR 27710.108th Avenue SE,Kent 98030 454 Mardian Elementary 1939 ME 25621-1401h Avenue BE, Kent 98042 497 Millennium Elementary 2000 Mi. 11919 BE 270th Street, Kent 98030 478 Neely-O'Brien Elementary 1990 NO 6300 South 2361h Street, Kent 98032 454 Panther Lake Elemenlary 2009 PL 20831-108th Avenue BE, Kent 98031 497 Park Orchard Elementary 1963 PO 11010 SE 232nd Street. Kent 98031 463 Pine Tree Elementary 1967 PT 27825-118th Avenue BE, Kent 98030 487 Ridgewood Elementary 1987 RW 18030-162nd Place BE, Renton 98058 477 Sawyer Woods Elementary 1994 SW 31135-228th Ave BE,Black Diamond 98010 477 Scenic Hill Elementary 1960 SH 26025 Woodland Way South, Kent 98030 454 Seas Creek Elementary 1971 SC 12651 BE 218th Place, Kent 98031 360 Springbrook Elementary 1969 SB 20035-1001h Avenue BE, Kent 98031 396 Sunrise Elementary 1992 SR 22300-132nd Avenue BE, Kent 98042 477 Elementary TOTAL 12,848 Cedar Heights Middle School 1993 CH 19640 BE 272 Street,Covington 98042 ass Mattson Middle School 1981 MA 16400 BE 251st Street, Covington 98042 787 Meeker Middle School 1970 MK 12600 BE 192nd Street, Renton 98058 832 Meridian Middle School 1958 MM 23480-120th Avenue BE, Kent 98031 792 Mill Creek Middle School 2005 MC 620 North Central Avenue, Kent 98032 916 Northwood Middle School 1996 NW 17007 BE 1841h Street, Renton 98058 926 Middle School TOTAL 5,148 Kent-Meridian High School 1951 KM 1OD20 BE 2561h Street, Kent 98030 1.904 Kentlake Senior High School 1997 KL 21401 BE 300th Street,Kent 98042 1,957 Kentddge Senior High School 1968 KR 12430 BE 2081h Street, Kent 93031 2,277 Kentwood Senior High School 1981 KW 25800-164th Avenue BE, Covington 98042 2,159 Senior High TOTAL 8,297 Kent Mountain View Academy 1997 MVILC 22420 Military Road, Des Moines 98198 396 Kent Phoenix Academy 2007 PH 11000 SE 264th Street, Kent 98030 414 DISTRICT TOTAL 27,103 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 3 May 2016 13 Kent School District Fall 2016/17 Demographic Report a + Ej of 1 f v,+ +'v I d a 8 ` IV ff, Apo r14 Lop i a :pry °ryQ a 0 II„3 Aii + �Fva 141 a J Z Apri119,2017 a, r a 14 Kent School District Fall 2016/17 Demographic Report QP CM M0 MI "o 4V fip � r,I;W G INl pI Yf9 .. (11%=11P1 lA P 41. ��tt9 Ma` F3 PIT ti NJ SiY IR UA b - I1 Y M M �1� � i, i u ry Al MY m �i) co-u ya ya�4� 2 Apd110,2017 16 Kent School District Fall 2016/17 Demographic Report jjj w � ii rA) P3111H pm ti E4 W y( YI�A a Y " 4Y MO �a t r✓" !m m vJ fq Ci x COI GAY VM bl'Ld z t April 19,2017 r 18 V Six-Year Planning and Construction Plan In November 2017, the voters of the Kent School District approved a bond measure for$252 million. This new bonding authority will provide for a replacement for Covington Elementary school (with increased capacity due to growth), a new elementary school in the Kent Valley (site to be determined), twenty additional classrooms throughout the district as well as other infrastructure projects. At the time of preparation of this Plan in spring of 2017, the following projects to increase capacity either are in the planning phase or will start in spring 2017. Planning is complete for a replacement school for Covington Elementary School in first quarter of 2019. The project will start in spring of 2017 with planned completion in fall 2018.The project is funded with a combination of bond funds (bonds issued in February 2017), state assistance and impact fees. • Planning is in progress for an additional elementary school in the Kent Valley in 2020 or beyond. The project will be funded with bonds funds and impact fees. • Planning is in progress to add an additional 20 classrooms to elementary schools. The locations will be determined by need. The project will be funded with bonds funds and impact fees. Enrollment projections reflect future need for additional capacity at the elementary school level. Future facility and site needs are reflected in this Plan. Some funding for lease or purchase of additional portables may be provided by impact fees as needed. Sites are based on need for additional capacity. As a critical component of capital facilities planning, county and city planners and decision-makers are encouraged to consider safe walking conditions for all students when reviewing applications and design plans for new roads and developments. This should include sidewalks for pedestrian safety to and from school and bus stops as well as bus pull-outs and turn-arounds for school buses. Included in this Plan is an inventory of potential projects and sites identified by the District which are potentially acceptable site alternatives in the future. (See Table a on Page 18&Site map on Page 19). Voter approved bond issues have included funding for the purchase of sites for some of these and future schools, and the sites acquired to date are included in this Plan. Some funding is secured for purchase of additional sites but some may be funded with impact fees as needed. Not all undeveloped properties meet current school construction requirements and some property may be traded or sold to meet future facility needs. The Board of Directors has started the process to sell surplus property in the spring of 2015. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2017 17 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.415 Site Acquisitions and Projects Planned to Provide Additional Capacity Projected Projected %far SCHOOL / FACILITY / SITE LOCATION Type Status Comph4lon'' Program new Date Capacity Growth AypmxWrvnlO ApFaaxYncta aoa May ELEMENTARY Replacement 5 Replacement for Covington Elementary SE 2561h Street&1541h Ave SE Elementary Planning 2018-19 630 19% Covington Elem- Capacity to be replaced 17070 SE Wax Road, Covington Elementary Utilized 530 Elementary New Elementary School Kent Valley Addition Planning 2020-2021 600 100% Elementary 20 Additional Permanent Classrooms Various schools where needed Addition Planning 2019-2022 480 100% MIDDLE SCHOOL 8 SENIOR HIGH No new projects required for Secondary Schools at this time&Secondary Schools are excluded from Impact Fee formula. TEMPORARY FACILITIES Additional Capacity Portables' TBD-Forplacement as needed New Planning 2017+ 24-31e 100% Map 2 OTHER SITES ACQUIRED road ura Land Use '.Map oeslgna0on Type Judsdiclion 4 Covington area North (Near Manson MS) SE 251 &154 SE, Covington 98042 Urban Elementary City of Covington 5 Covington area West (Halleson-Nfikstrom) SE 256&154 SE, Covington 98042 Urban Elementary City of Covington 3 Ham Lake area (Pollard) 16820 SE 240, Kent 98042 Rural Elementary King County 8 SE of Lake Morton area (West property) SE 332&204 SE, Kent 96042 Rural Secondary King County 2 Shady Lk area(Sowers,Blaine,Drahola,Paroline) 17426 SE 192 Street, Renton 98058 Urban Elementary Icing County 1 So.King Co.Activity Center(former Nike site) SE 167&170 SE, Renton 98058 Rural TBD King County 12 South Central site (Yeh-Wms) SE 286th St&1241h Ave SE,Auburn 96092 Urban TBD King County Notes: 'TBD-To be determined-Some sites are Identified but placement.timing andlor configuration of portables has not been determined. I Numbers correspond to sites on Site Bank Map on Page 20.Other Map site Iowbons are parcels identified in Table 7 an Page 30. Kent School District Su-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 4 April 2017 18 9 G� �l � 0 33. V � o P 5 i mw um JR gg Y,° 10 � YI�I a5 N 91A01 775IUppp 02 x' �p�� Ja�� r3S rarkHW✓,CI �� �i �� S sWzeY .+.i,. ,.. o.5g°?� e 98 sm �m — pj awtiY NIIV4� f� AW+.YI 'Ad�i>.Wh AWhi t BaWlaslui l:enc ocY.oa10!str!ct5k!Isar CaPl�l Pacdlfi�Plan 19 The Board will continue annual review of standard of service and those decisions will be reflected in the each update of the Capital Facilities Plan. V I Portable Classrooms The Plan references use of portable as interim or transitional Capacity and facilities. Currently, the District utilizes portables to house students in excess of permanent capacity and for program purposes at some school locations. (Please see Appendices A, a, c Based on enrollment projections, implementation of full day kindergarten programs, lower state mandated class size, program capacity and the need for additional permanent capacity, the District anticipates the need to purchase or lease additional portables during the next six-year period. During the time period covered by this Plan, the District does not anticipate that all of the District's portables will be replaced by permanent facilities. During the useful life of some of the portables, the school-age population may decline in some communities and increase in others, and these portables provide the flexibility to accommodate the immediate needs of the community. Portables may be used as interim or transitional facilities: 1. To prevent overbuilding or overcrowding of permanent school facilities. 2. To cover the gap between the times of demand for increased capacity and completion of permanent school facilities to meet that demand. 3. To meet unique program requirements. Portables currently in the District's inventory are continually evaluated resulting in some being improved and some replaced. The Plan projects that the District will use portables to accommodate interim housing needs for the next six years and beyond. The use of portables, their impacts on permanent facilities, life cycle and operational costs, and the interrelationship between portables, emerging technologies and educational restructuring will continue to be examined. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Apn12017 20 V I I Projected Six-Year Classroom Capacity As stated in Section W, the program capacity study is periodically updated for changes in special programs and reflects class size requirements, class size fluctuations etc. As shown in the Inventory and Capacity chart in Table 3 on Page 13, the program capacity is also reflected in the capacity and enrollment comparison charts. (See Tables 565A-8-C on pages 22-25). Enrollment is electronically reported to OSPI on Form P-223 on a monthly basis and funding apportionment is based on Annual Average FTE (AAFTE). The first school day of October is widely recognized as the enrollment "snapshot in time"to report enrollment for the year. Kent School District continues to be the fifth largest district(both fte and headcount basis) in the state of Washington. P-223 Headcount for October 2016 was 26,529 with kindergarten students counted at 1.0 and excluding ECSE and college-only Running Start students. A full headcount of all students enrolled in October 2016 totals 28,089, which include ECSE and college-only Running Start students. In October 2016, there were 1,015 students in 11th and 12th grade participating in the Running Start program at different colleges and receiving credits toward both high school and college graduation. Five hundred eighty-nine of these students attended classes only at the college ("college-only") and are excluded from FTE and headcount for capacity and enrollment comparisons. Kent School District has one of the highest Running Start program participation rates in the state. Based on the enrollment forecasts, permanent facility inventory and capacity, current standard of service, portable capacity, and future additional classroom space, the District plans to continue to satisfy concurrency requirements through the transitional use of portables. (see Table S and Tables 5 A-8-C on Pages 22-25). This does not mean that some schools will not experience overcrowding. There may be a need for additional portables and/or new schools to accommodate growth within the District. New schools may be designed to accommodate placement of future portables. School attendance area changes, limited and costly movement of portables, zoning changes, market conditions, and educational restructuring will all play a major role in addressing overcrowding and underutilization of facilities in different parts of the District. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2017 21 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY TOTAL DISTRICT SCHOOL YEAR 2016-17 2017-18 2018-18 2019-20 1 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 Actual P R O J E C T E D Permanent Program Capacity 1 27,103 27,103 27,103 27,103 27.323 27,443 28,163 Changes to Permanent Capacity 1 Capacity Increase(F) Replacement school with projected increase in capacity: Covington Elementary Replacement (u) 2 630 To Replace current Covington Elementary capacity -530 New Elementary School in Kent Valley' 600 Additional Permanent Classrooms 120 120 120 120 Permanent Program Capacity Sublotal 27.103 27,103 27,103 27.323 27.443 28.163 28,283 Interim Portable Capacity ° Elementary Portable capacity Required 1,440 1,656 1,728 1,440 1,248 456 336 Mlddle Stl l Portable capacity Requlred 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 senior High sdwol Padabte Capeclty Repaired 7 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 1,440 1,656 1,728 1,440 1.248 456 336 TOTAL CAPACITY 1 28,543 28,759 28,831 28,763 28,691 28,619 28,619 TOTAL ENROLLMENT/PROJECTION' 26,529 26,432 26,452 26.509 26,749 T 26.911 27.032 DISTRICT AVAILABLE CAPACITY s 2,014 2,327 2„379 2,254 1,942 1.708 1.587� 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. P Replacement school for Covington Elementary will increase capacity and will be built on a different existing urban site, a New Elementary School on site in Kent Valley to be determined. 4 2016-17 total classroom portable capacity is 1440.Some additional rsiocatable used for program purposes. 5 Actual October Headcount Enrollment with Projections from OSPI Report 1049-Determination of Projected Enrollments. a School capacity meets concurrency requirements and no impact fees are proposed for secondary schools. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 April 2017 22 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY ELEMENTARY - Grades K - 6 SCHOOL YEAR 2016-17 2017-18 2019-19 2019-20 1 2020-21 2021-22 1 2022-23 Actual P R O 1 E C T E D Elementary Permanent Capacity' 12,848 13,244 13.244 13,244 13,464 13,584 14,304 Kent Mountain View Academy 2 396 Changes to Elementary Capacity'.. Covington Elementary Replacement (U)3 630 Will replace current Covington Elementary capacity -530 New Elementary School in Kent Valley 600 Additional Permanent Classrooms° 120 120 120 120 Subtotal 13,244 13,244 13,244 13.464 13,584 14,304 14,424 Portable Capacity Required' 1,440 1656 1728 1440 1248 456 336 TOTAL CAPACITY 112 14,684 14,900 14,972 14,904 14,832 14,760 14.780 Adjusted for FULL.D.ay Kindergarten Headcount ENROLLMENT]PROJECTION' 14.688 14,910 14.968 14.915 14.838 14.763 14.757 SURPLUS(DEFICIT)CAPACITY -10 4 -11 -6 -3 3 Number of Portables Required 60 69 72 60 52 19 14 ' Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 Kent Mountain View Academy is a special program serving students in Grades 3-12. The school building(formerly Kent Leaming Center&Grandview Elem.)was designed as an elementary school. Replacement school for Covington Elementary will increase rapacity and is planned for a different existing urban site. 'Additional classrooms will be placed at schools with the greatest need for aleve overcrowding s Actual October Headcount Enrollment with Projections from OSPI Report 1049-Determination of Projected Enrollments. Enrollment&Projections reflect FULL Day Kindergarten at ALL Elementary schools @ 1.0&exclude ELSE Preschoolers. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 A Apn12017 23 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY @IMIIDDLE SCHOOL Grades 7 - 8 SCHOOL YEAR 2015-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 1 2020-21 2021-22 1 2022-23 Actual P R O J E C T E D Middle School Permanent Capacity' 5.148 5.148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 No Changes to Middle School Capacifly I Subtotal 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5.148 Portable Capacity Rewired ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL CAPACITY 's' 5.148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,146 5,148 5,148 ENROLLMENT I PROJECTION Z 4,042 3.986 4.068 4,335 4,463 4,476 4.397 SURPLUS (DEFICIT)CAPACITY 1,106 1,162 1,080 813 685 672 751 Number of Portables Required 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No Classroom Portables required at middle schools at this time,Some Portables used for classroom and program purposes. 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 Actual October Headcount Enrollment with Projections from OSPI Report 1049-Determination of Projected Enrollments. ' Surplus Capacity due to grade level reconfiguration-All 9th grade students moved to the high schools in Fall 2004. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 B April 2017 24 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY SENIOR HIGH - Grades 9 - 12 SCHOOL ' 2016-17 2017-18 201&19 2019-20 1 2020-21 2021-22 1 2022-23 Actual P R O J E C T E ❑ Senior High Permanent Capaciiy'� 8,711 8,711 8,711 8,711 8,711 8,711 8,711 Includes Kent Phoenix Academy 2 No Changes to High School Capacity subtotal 8,711 8.711 8,711 8,711 5,711 8,711 8,711 Portables Capacity Required 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL CAPACITY ' 8,711 8.711 8.711 8.711 8,711 8.711 8.711 ENROLLMENT t PROJECTION ' 7,799 7,536 7,416 7,259 7,448 7,672 7.878 SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 912 1,175 1,295 1,452 1,263 1,039 833 Number of Portables Required 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No Classroom Portables required at this time.Some Portables used for classroom and program purposes. ' Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 Kent Phoenix Academy opened in Fall 2007 serving grades 9-12 with four special programs. ' Actual October Enrollment with Projections from OSPI Report 1049-Determination of Projected Enrollments. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 C April 2017 25 V I I I Finance Plan The finance plan shown on Table 6 demonstrates how the Kent School District plans to finance improvements for the years 2017-2018 through 2022-2023. The financing components include secured and unsecured funding and impact fees. The plan is based on future bond issues, state school construction assistance, collection of impact fees under the State Growth Management Act and voluntary mitigation fees paid pursuant to State Environmental Policy Act. The plan calls for the replacement of Covington Elementary in 2018-19 which will increase the capacity of the current school by approximately 20%. Some impact fees will be utilized as part of the finance plan. The plan also includes an additional elementary school in the Kent Valley and the siting will be determined at a later date. The district does have two sites where the school could be placed and a decision has not been made. This new school will increase the capacity at the elementary level by 600 students. Some impact fees are scheduled to be part of the overall finance plan. To address overcrowding at our elementary schools, the plan also includes twenty additional permanent classrooms at the schools of the greatest need.A decision as to the placing of these classrooms has not been made. These classrooms will be at the schools with the most overcrowding. Some impact fees are scheduled to be part of the overall finance plan. In November 2016, the District held a special election to approve the authorization of $252,000,000 in bonding authority. The projects described above are part of this authorization. The first series of bonds ($80 million) were issued in February 2017, which will fund the replacement of Covington Elementary as well as other infrastructure projects. The Finance Plan includes new portables to be purchased or leased to provide additional capacity and some may be funded from impact fees. Enrollment projections reflect future need for additional capacity at the elementary level and unfunded facility needs will be reviewed in the future and reported in annual updates of the Capital Facilities Plan. No impact fees are requested for secondary schools in this Plan. For the Six-Year Finance Plan, costs of future schools are based on estimates from Kent School District Facilities Department. Please see pages 27-28 for a summary of the cost basis. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2017 26 V I I I Finance Plan - Cost Basis Summary For impact fee calculations, construction costs are based on cost of the last elementary school, adjusted for inflation, and projected cost of the future elementary schools and additional classrooms. Elementary School Cost Projected Cost Cost of Panther Lake Elementary $26,700,000 Replacement (Opened in Fall 2009) Projected cost- Covington Elementary $46,077,470 Replacement (Projected to open in 2018) Projected cost of New Elementary School $46,000,000 Kent Valley (Projected to open in 2020) 20 Additional permanent Classrooms $16.829,000 Site Acquisition Cost The site acquisition cost is based on an average cost of sites purchased or built on within the last ten years. Please see Table 7 on page 29 for a list of site acquisition costs and averages. District Adjustment The impact fee calculations on pages 31 and 32 include a 'District Adjustment' which is equal to the amount of increase that the impact fee formulas total for this year and adjusted for the increase in the Consumer Price Index (2.6%) for the Seattle metropolitan area. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2017 27 - ? � , ƒ § ! 7 § [ 2 § ] a ¥ F— / LLI \ \ 0 - / d \ � § ° J & ) \ ( \ / \ ! ! \ } .5; ( ) { , ; � 16 : ) ( - ( k > \ ` f T \; � > � } \ ` / § ) \ / } / r - - a Clf � - - / ` /k2 ; § r-0 - - of2 � _ - u � 2 - ® � , _ \� )§ / 3 « 2 ® � Ef ; . . ■ � � � � @ to o k { { / ro _ ) | - | $ - 03 ! f - 2 ! 2 ? CD ) } \ § - ! ! ƒ ; ! = e ; 05 El : © )j0 § § KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT FACTORS FOR ESTIMATED IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS Student Generation Factors -Single Family Student Generation Factors-Multi-Family Elementary (Grades K-6) 0.398 Elementary 0.117 Middle School (Grades 7-8) 0.096 Middle School 0.028 Senior High (Grades 9-12) 0.185 Senior High 0.029 Total 0.679 Total 0.174 Projected Increased Student Capacity OSPI -Square Footage per Student Elementary 2,516 Elementary 90 Middle School 0 Middle School 117 Senior High Addition 0 Senior High 130 Special Education 144 Required Site Acreage per Facility Elementary (required) 11 Average Site Cost/Acre Middle School (required) 21 Elementary $110,077 Senior High (required) 32 Middle School $686,883 Senior High $524,564 New Facility Construction Cost Elementary` $46,077,47D Temporary Facility Capacity & Cost Middle School $0 Elementary @ 24 $125,01110 Senior High " $0 Middle School @ 29 $0 See cost basis on Pg.26 Senior High @ 31 $0 Temporary Facility Square Footage State Funding Assistance Credit Elementary 142,980 Dlstdct Funding Assistance Percentage 56.96% Middle School 10,736 Senior High 22,192 Total 5.1% 175,908 Construction Cost Allocation CCA-Cost/Sq.Ft. (Effective July 2016) $213.23 Permanent Facility Square Footage Elementary (includesKWA) 1,470,543 Middle School 660,904 District Average Assessed Value Senior High 1,110,415 Single Family Residence $328,047 Total 94.9% 3,241,862 Total Facilities Square Footage District Average Assessed Value Elementary 1,613,523 Multi-Family Residence $143,332 Middle School 671,640 Senior High 1.132,607 Total 3,417,770 Bond Levy Tax Rate/$1,000 Cuffent 1$1,000 Tax Rate $1.03 Developer Provided Sites/Facilities Value 0 General Obligation Bond Interest Rate Dwelling Units 0 Current Bond Interest Rate 3.95% CPI Inflation Factor 2.60% Kent School Dlstdct Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2017 30 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Site Acquisition Cast per Single Family Residence Formula: ((Acres x Cast per Acre)i Facility Capaciy)x Student Generation Factor Required S6®Acreage [As.U.SK.G0sVAcrej FgaT40opadty I Student Factor A 1 (Elementary) 11 $110,077 630 0.398 $764.95 A2 (Middle School) 21 $0 1,065 0.070 $0 A 3 (Senior High) 32 $0 1,000 0.138 $0 0.606 A b $764:95 Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Single Family Residence Formula: ((Facility Cast I Facility Capacg )x Student Factor x Permanrm otal Square Feolage Ratio) Conslrvdion Cost Fa4lily Caparlly Student Factor FOAIagp Ralw B 1 (Elementary) $46,077,470 630 0.398 0.903 $26,285.66 82 (Middle School) $0 900 0.096 0,984 s0 B 3 (Senior High) $0 1.6()0 0.185 0.996 $0 0.679 B b $28,265.66 Temporary Facility Cost per Single Family Residence Formula: ((Facility Cost/Facility Capacity)x Student Factor)x(Temporary I Total Square Footage Ratio) Fadlity Cost FacIty Capacity I Sludent Fadw I Foolage Ratio C1 (Elementary) $125.000 24 0.398 0097 $201.07 C2 (Midd(e School) $0 29 0.070 0.016 $0 C 3 (Senior High) $0 31 0.138 0.02 $0 0.606 C b $201.07 State Funding Assistance Credit per Single Family Residence (formerly"Stale Match') Formula: Area Cost Allowance x SPI Square Feel per student x Funding,ASsistance% x Slutlenl Factor C ,;WN nCmtAM mn I SPIlq:.Ft./Student I Assistance Student Fador D 1 (Elementary) $213.23 90 0.5696 0.398 $4,350S5 D 2 (Middle School) $213.23 117 0 0.096 $0 D3 (Senior High) $213.23 130 0 0,185 s0 D b $4.350.55 Tax Credit per Single Family Residence Average SF Residential Assessed Value $328,047 Current Debt Service Rate 1$1,000 $1.03 Current Bond Interest Rate 3.95% Years Amortized (10Years) 10 TC O $1,988,27 Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility/Site Value CNw:Oinp UnRs 0 0 FC o 0 Fee Recap A = Site Acquisition per SF Residence $764.95 B = Permanent Facility Cost per Residence $26,285.66 C = Temporary Facility Cast per Residence $201.07 Subtotal $27,251.63 D = State Match Credit per Residence $4,350.55 TC-Tax Credit per Residence $1,988.27 Subtotal $6.338.82 Total Unfunded Need $20,912.86 50%Developer Fee Obligation $10,466 FC=Facility Credit(it applicable) 0 District Adjustment(see page 28 for explanation) (5,221) Net Fee Obligation per Residence-Sin to Fam fly 6,235 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2017 31 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENCE Site Acquisition Cost per Multl-Family Residence Unit Formula: ((Acres x Cost peY Acfe)y Ferplily Capaoil)x Student Generation Factor Required Sae Acreege Average Site CgsUAme Faelxy Cepadly Sludenl Fodor A 1 (Elementary) 11 $110,077 630 0.117 $224,67 A 2 (Middle School) 21 $0 1,065 0.028 $0 A 3 (Senior High) 32 $0 1,000 0.029 $0 0,174 A b $224.67 Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Multl-Famlly Residence Unit Formula: ((Facility Cost 7 Facility Capacity)x Student Factor)x(Pamranent I Total Square Footage Ratio) C,nstrucfon Cost FaUTIIV Caeacrty I Student Fodor I Feeley,Ratio B 1 (Elementary) $46.077,470 630 0.117 0.903 $7,727.19 B 2 (Middle School) $0 1,065 0.028 0.904 $0 B 3 (Senior High) $0 1,600 0.029 0.998 $u 0.174 8 b $7,727.19 Temporary Facility Cost per Multi-Family Residence Unit Formula: ((Facility Cost 7 Facility Capacity)x Student Factor)x(Temporary/Total Square Footage Rate) Facility Cast Facility Cepwrly I Student Factor Fedage Ratio C 1 (Elementary) $125,000 24 0.117 0.097 $59.11 02 (Middle School) $0 29 0.028 0.016 $0 C 3 (Senior High) $0 31 0.029 0.02 $0 0.174 C b $59.11 State Funding Assistance Credit per Mulct-Family Residence (formerly"State Match') Formula: Area Cost Allowance x SFI Square Feet per student x Funding Assistance% x Student Factor Area C,st Allowance I SPISq.FI./Student I IEqup9ralipn% StutleM Fader D 1 (Elementary) $213.23 90 0,5696 0.117 $10278.93 D 2 (Middle School) $213.23 117 0 0.022 $p D 3 (Senior High) $213.23 130 0 0.039 $0 D b S1,278.93 Tax Credit per Multi-Family Residence Unit Average MF Residential Assessed Value $143,332 Current Debt Service Rate 1$1.000 $1.03 Current Bond Interest Rate 3,95% Years Amortized (10 Years) 10 TC a $1,156.85 Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility/Site Value bvelYimg Unlls 0 0 FC b 0 Fee Recap A = Site Acquisition per Multi-Family Unit $224.87 B = Permanent Facility Cost per MF Unit $7,727.19 C = Temporary Facility Cost per MF Unit $59.11 Subtotal $8,011.17 D = Stale Match Credit per MF Unit $1,278.93 TC=Tax Credit per MF Unit $1,156.85 Subtotal $2,435.78 Total Unfunded Need $5.675.39 50%Developer Fee Obligation $2,788 FC=Facility Credit(if applicable) 0 District Adjustment(see page 28 for explanation) 1$518) Net Fee Obligation per Residential Unit-MultFfamlly $2,267 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2017 32 IX Summary of Changes to June 2016 Capital Facilities Plan The Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") is updated annually based on previous Plans in effect since 1993. The primary changes from the May 2016 Plan are summarized here. Changes to capacity continue to reflect fluctuations in class size as well as program changes. Changes in portables or transitional capacity reflect use, lease or purchase, sale, surplus and/or movement between facilities. The student headcount enrollment forecast is updated annually. All Elementary schools now have Full Day Kindergarten so six-year Kindergarten projections were previously modified to meet the requirements for Full Day Kindergarten programs at all elementary schools. The district expects to receive some State Funding Assistance (formerly called "state matching funds") for projects in this Plan and tax credit factors are updated annually. Unfunded site and facility needs will be reviewed in the future. The impact fees for 2017 will increase by the percentage increase of the consumer price index for the Seattle metropolitan area in. For 2016, the increase was 2.6%. For single-family residences, the fee will increase by $135 to $5,235. The impact fee for multi-family units will increase by$57 to $2,210. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan AprI12017 33 Changes to Impact Fee Calculation Factors include: ITEM Grade/Type FROM TO Comments Student Generation Factor Elem 0.257 0.398 Single Family(SF) MS 0.070 0.096 SH 0.138 0,185 Total 0.465 0.679 0.214Increase Student Generation Factor Elem 0.111 0.117 Multi-Family(MF) MS 0.022 0.028 SH 0.039 0,029 Total 0.172 0.174 0.002Increase State Funding Assistance Ratios("State 56.96% 56.96% Per OSPI Website Match") Area Cost Allowance $213.23 $213.23 Per OSPI Website Average Assessed Valuation (AV) SF $307,784 $328,047 Puget Sound ESD AV-Average of Condominiums&Apts. MF $123,109 $143,332 Puget Sound ESD Debt Service Capital Levy Rate/$1000 $1.398 $1.0269 Per King Co.Assessor Report General Obligation Bond Interest Rate 3.27% 3.95% Bond Buyers 20 year GO Index Impact Fee-Single Family SF $5,100 $5,235 Increase of$135 or 2.6% Impact Fee-Multi-Family MF $2.210 $2,267 Increase of$57 or 2.6% Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2017 34 a S O z Y T Z r a Z r r z a z Y Z Y Y Z Z y. Y r a Z Z n 44 F mo o _ d w v m Z N „y E J n W O W J n w Wn m pp o �p pm ® y e m oYp� o yy ryry N ° q@ y Z N e ONi e m P d n °4 e P e m m 4 b m N r m b N P N 0 fNl Q 4 � � m O w• N m � � m O C n 4 N rry N m P m � S ry m r A D E ry O W E v $L a 5 LL a � 'a W m a Y 0 W J E o LL v m � m VV U LL 0' � m O n N O n N O z p d a m E U ` � h2 Ea m - p m..m m rv� q g n m m N m n n m n m m e x p c $ n e e a P o v 'e 2 Z O W e Q W o W a rm a _ ? p v 4 Q f• �_ y n U. M N N O N N N teV fN'1 N O W 6 o m -- � � m mmm N O� m n n 4 n E Y o m m °M1 n m n N O N � � q g O 4 e q e N O n 4 4 Q Q n e P P n �''1 n n N Nry e u4i � C n R m o E m o o DDD m 2 m O W z m U m m Y V p m YwS U j p 3 2 6 W C W U < F N ¢ p Q JpE F 2 ° W F 1 mm. a m cc f O a m Z U E m ¢ O e u $ d N � � m 9 Y f y U o _ d F � e �' m o IX w E m � i 9RR I - °0 5 -"` t a ° L• m c _ o 4 E � 2 ° LL a' a rc wm in m Gi z rC= O °o N Y 35 A 0 N 12 m Ery p E z a %6 C CW � = W � x yp L �l N O CJ m W vk. jz p N y�j O N O "j a N G @ @ m N m •° m � � m � m f] O m ry O Q C'.,.. � N K W g n Yll v W f N n W N J W Z .g m N w W Ec U t� m 4S m N V a _ E m W � ° LL m W = - f U m LL N ryry @ A • � a im V F A N A N N m u 12 O N A Q a m Z 0 4 m 1` m n m N N CO d m m N _ m Q Z •` U M1 N E L D H a - N N N m" N c c U p N y `q }E dry' m ❑ yy Ep $� i5 ❑ e ° 7 Q' 0 O m $ (ya. A m N Q m o W b �+ H m c a • W W 01 m a O. S Z N a € m N Q N Q E Q a L" N m Oj E Q m'., w 3 N m ❑' �- H � 8 O Q w 3 m qp LL 9 F N O N ' m O oc F® > > `° � # y p• 1.1 N N N M C] m � h {� N N m m C N p m C ° W U V a T T L ° E 8' F � O m 6 D {p E a c c Z c 5 . G� � V) E U F Z Y Y Y Y Y Y Y K N N W f w OU O V N C m Y 36 Kent School District Fall 2016/17 Demographic Report i�," 'r.r/¢'r'� �IrP ��%ir, {���s)�r�l ��r SWtlu �l�in�,Np6,,v(uhB�Nfr.,�*�jofal9 •41„tl )r9kc��rl�in�mtmaY,�,a�s rrk ra ial:51 Renton Riverton tlhi Heights Af r r Yl4-s.O I pal 7aR Wite-SWe 4 Maplewood ,, Elliott .a N N 4r�. y�fperinri!-0nnln Vnl°Y PoI SDI tAo fight, ggg cvml Xeehta Collor n s Oqy, oNl51ll111 •° .;, Otlllla a tno.. 91 M nl Sr Nor, 1i{ G°�c 'vl Ivey Ru Cedar Bravo G\'A0I 3 lann,91 i &ent'tllc :t = �wwr W.192wtl 9r 'f O'BrienYp,E YE20AII 31 >, anzllr Sly - " w Z 5b SE 22111,91 ti 2lgp'. z //r 5F vaxnn 51 Maple ffndiu Mid&9 a o '! oal e..V11 @h wndanuu Village rvt*r Kdnl F NIrA� mM1 Uv Marini n Holub ° so,lSerbel i $ � W u m sue Lope hR �, Covington Cherokee ,°.Mentlllh 9E 2ylnn Ar w Bay Park 5,`2R7 n.o.p1 w . VhIM4 n S 2nAl1,NI _ P r/¢hrq{NlV Be!lytlelo ;'9E+Aanlh 5r z n g ri, CHrbldphef n S xn ! SE]anle M C,r.tt ,n Lee HIII ^+,. - _ SE In)rL 5t y �r� 2 � p e .icy dm,nnn,r NJ ,1. \0 6 VV+ k M.+In tll Auburn w '� I r.1Y 51 SW U : T Green River HE G.oc �. rr yh 5 1� a Apartment rc rry Multi-family attached ? N, 0 Single family detached t 2 S 4Miles ryy� aF)fitlpf�q} District April t9,2017 it r y v 11 f n n 37 n ry Q R 0 0 0 0 0 0 CZ! 9N q q C� li R q 'I R li -i q q q q ri q IR q q q a m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 nq OR 0 oq Oq q q q Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 mf 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 pQ 0 0 n 0 0 0 0 m m 0 m I 0 a v 0 8 H 0 0 0 m 0 v w 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 0 d 6 6 6 d 6 6 c; O m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 0 w 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 0 . 0 � O 0 0 0 n 0 0 0 d d 0 6 wl C5 6 6 6 r4 6 6 d 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 ti LL a m 0 0 N 0 M H rl 0 0 O O w H 0 0 0 0 H n N Z o sn z 0 o an 6 6 6 z 2 z v E5 on. 0 c G cq11 m 0 M U jE N c N o u 0 . S: , - , -E > U U Q U 75 u u VJ 0 n 0 0 N Q p V pryp {q p m p� Q 0 0 0 0 CJ CJ N rmi N ��'1 $ L4 O n m O O 4F1. O O M 1+ iD O N © 4D N m o .`o.� m as a a Q o a 6 `o' M O O O O G O 0 0! O O O Cl Q CY 0 0 0 C? pj (y [') CY C Cj Cj C] O O dp9 C) 0 0 0 0 g O N O O O M O M 00 O d M1 d Pj W 0 d d q 6 Qp m O W +H O M �T} O O O n Oi O N g q N p cs O O p O o N N, !W N O CS 6 O O 6 0 0 0 O O [S O O O [J SY O O O O O CJ Gt N C] m O O Iff O O W Ldl m n v a Oo o m Oo 1l O O O n O O go0 m omopOq �O rvrl riN m v n rve o .l O lMn V 4N 6 o p o o 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .4 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 o 0 o o o o C w 91 w a w o # 0 m O g m p m O m O O N O m m 0 01 0 0 V m 0 0 0 m V O N 0 .+ o N m m g q M p p q v o o In o M In d m m 0g q n m O 0 o m p r. It r p p g m p ry m m m n o o 111 o vl m o m o v o o m o 0 vi Li m p In 0 0 0 0 .+ .• 0 .i d D H N N rl rl y � y •i V N . LL Z O X yCj ~ W o W w sx ue v m o a .w ca r T„ cr sF � o o T N'. o o .� m N •+ .� 4 o ' � N w w f T a I K o m m m m n o m m o o m p r m ry p m a o 0 m o f m m m O H M Vy 4A W N t-1 +^i M pry'} I/y p T T ? 41 V m n 'i rl n Vl n m N �. m N m rl m Vl rl �� C d a C = w E a p m ry H a - > Z n N o ob Z m o v c c c E ; m' > LL Z w o al nl N N Ip q C C O O � � v � O m m c u w w w w w w - 0 0 0 w m m m o a w w w w w w w w Y 39 n M 0 N 6 p O Q O Q m n 0 0 N o o tno v m rp V bT M rbw O Q O N 0 N O O m m O O N O M O e1 N M i4 4T an CM O G O O 6 OO 6 0 6 0 6 6 6 6 6 6 Ci 6 O 6 6 6 6 o 6 ri 6 a O 6 o 0 6 2 W VY w O O O O O O O O w N N O M O O m O m O O n 6 W O O 0 O n Q O pp Q o 0 o m o Q o o b m m a m o a m o o b o o m m o o 0 0 o a o 0 0 o m o .1 N g o o a M o 0 0 u 0 n 0 o ci fl o p L+ 0 0 O d d d o ci C C -b o n �n o m o o Q m m .� 0 0 o m o m cs ¢ n N .� s.J n O b N O Vl O O N b N M O O 1!1 O m n ¢ © b O N O w O O h a O O m m O 1 O O O m m N N N n n Q b O b O Q O w O Q T n O O 0 0 o E a ¢ ¢ O O O N O O O O O O O O O O O O {} 0 0 0 0 0 M 0 0 0 0 0 a d W .p a a O M ¢ M1 N ("Y 4' O M1 V1 W b IO V1 O O� W O f^ O O n O M1 O m O O Id M O n 'W M f+5 N N Cf O m m ¢ Q O O IU O O O W O O q M1A O b H Uj o N Ll�o m N N N (.} m a O O O (1y' m LO O Q 6 ,4 O M tp Ct 6 H O D 9 M O O 6 ® O' 6 0 0 6 6 6 rE M O Cl O .-1 O CA e'1 O .'1 O 6 el o O Y D F- N3 e'f. m IT5 CS b N O N © M ✓1 W eY 'i5' f9 O O Q .1 Q CJ b N O m rtY Q O O N_ VI O O m . LL Z o ¢ N m a a o N a w a o n Q N ¢ N n a w a N a 0 v ¢ m. a a a a w a a p m Ga H � p Q a+ W m O m O .y tT O O tt 6(J M M ."� .'1 N m w O a O O Q D � � VN N N � w H > v W Z o Q m w o ."I m o V1 o M 1p o Q Ifl M M M ry R N o O l0 0 lO m b M ry N b a M N O F- m M m m N t0 W N m .y b m O N m N N Q n .} m M .-1 N M n N W N N Q O m w N M O M Ill e1 N M C a j a N C a = v � E a — o y a a c J ,o p n u T > Ll' CW N O Y E L IO 6 C O N r •' 2 i n LL o " U W Iw Ys a LL bo m m 1O o a l7 ; m e l7 .1Oi a s E am o « > c a u s N • a vLi u 0 o J O o m w Y 40 n N 0 n 4 o O N l0 o O m m a0 0 0 o V o O O O d m O N d N w m N v1 m 0 m m p o N O N O O o o n 0 VI N m N m l N m m W O O O 10 O O N N O N O O r1 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O m N O O O O O O O O O O O N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O = D = O w D m o w y o m w m o D d Q r m o IO Fr o d o 0 0 0 o N n N w o n m o ry o In O d n 1!1 O O m m N O O G 0 W O m W O 0 W O w n n W V1 N O N O tIl N 1lf O O Vf m N p V1 t0 N O Nm OO ON OO ON mO dH N n N N v w v w 0 00 o m o o m vin' m o �u m o m m o m d o m N m rv � w o Ia O V O n O O IO l0 N M Vf Cl N N O N W O vl m b R N N N Vf N V O Q m N O O Ill m n n n O Q O O N O N N m O d O d N O m N n O O O N o O 0 O O O O O D O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O f H _,___ O Q N n O O � � N m 0 ei O N O O O O N N O N Vl N r N N d M N N O = � V O C O m d N O O 0 N Q N O tp O d O O O O O N Q m N O d rl r1 '1 O ry Q Z O N N N x H r- r J p�j 0 O n N Vf O O N m N tp m tp O N 111 O N T O I!1 N W m M d M W N N ', 4 H o w w m Y o m .Ni .di o p ry N .Ni m m N N o N M o n In ry m N In m n N m vl m N n d n l0 n N N I p o to I- F N r N N N N N lO N Vl d 41 n N O lD Q n n O 0 m l0 m N O N m l0 N N N d 1ry N n m O1 lO n N 0 N N O 0 d n W m m � a d a i Q m L E L o u m m .'2 m Fo- > E o '" n E Co In 15I bf ti Cl W 0 0 p W m y m n v o m J O v c In z zan � zt� S3x c v Y 41 6% KENT SCHOOL March 13, 2017 DISTRICT Mr. Aaron BeMiller City of Kent Director of Financial Services 400 W. Gowe St. Kent, WA 98032 Re: Annual Report of Impact Fee Expenditures—2016 Dear Mr. BeMiller: In compliance with section I, item D of our interlocal agreement, enclosed is the 2016 Annual Report of City of Kent Impact Fee Expenditures for the Kent School District. There were multiple expenditures from City of Kent impact fees during the 2016 calendar year. Expenditures were for additional portable classrooms at Springbrook, Scenic Hill, Martin Sortun and Meridian elementary schools. Future reports will continue to be sent on, or prior to,April 1 each year,or upon request. If you have any questions,please call me at 253-373-7295. Sincerely, Ralph M. Fortunato, CSBS Executive Director of Fiscal Services cc: Lisa Verner, King County Dept. of Permitting and Environmental Review Crina Ghimpu, King County Dept. of Permitting and Environmental Review Bobbi Terns, King County Dept. of Executive Services Charlene Anderson, Planning Manager, City of Kent Ben Wolters, Director,Economic and Community Development, City of Kent Denise Stiffarm, Pacifica Law Group Gwenn Escher-Derdowski, Community Planning Administrator Enclosure imp�pnoc Fiscal Services 12033 SE 256th Street Suite A-600 Kent,Washington 98030-6503 Ph:253-373-7295 Fax:253-373-7018 1 //rr 1 ,;, .. .. ni arrr��%�i� Auburn School Diistrict No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 20, 17 through 202 , �r p� yv. d H+a a j� l�;fr ff( qrf 11N ail yjli �j . I 1 / e I Adopted by the Auburn School District Board of Directors June 26, 2017 Table of Contents Section I Executive Summary Page 1 Section II Enrollment Projections.....................Page 6 Section III Standard of Service... .......-..... -. Page 8 Section IV Inventory of Facilities...................... Page 16 Section V Pupil Capacity............................... Page 20 Section VI Capital Construction Plan— —.. .... Page 23 Section VII Impact Fees— ......... Page 27 Section VIII Appendices.. .............. Page 31 Appendix A.1 - Student Enrollment Projections Page 32 Appendix A.2 - Capital Facilities Plan Projections Page 45 Appendix A.3 - Student Generation Survey Page 50 Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2017 through 2023 Section I Executive Summary Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2017 through 2023 I. Executive Summary This six-year Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") has been prepared by the Auburn School District (the "District") as the District's principal planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act and the adopted ordinances of the counties and cities served by the District. This Plan was prepared using data available in the spring of 2017. This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the District. However, this Plan is not intended to be the sole plan for all of the District's needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic long-range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board Policies and actions, taking into account a longer or a shorter time period, other factors and trends in the use of facilities; and other needs of the District as may be required. However, any such plan or plans will be consistent with this six-year Capital Facilities Plan. To enable the collection of impact fees in the unincorporated areas of King County and within the City of Auburn and City of Kent; the King County Council, the City of Auburn and the City of Kent will adopt this Plan by reference as part of each jurisdiction's respective comprehensive plan. To enable the collection of impact fees in the Cities of Algona, Pacific, and Black Diamond, these municipalities must also adopt this Plan and adopt school impact fee ordinances. Pursuant to the requirements of the Growth Management Act and the local ordinances, this Plan will be updated on an annual basis, and any changes in the fee schedule(s) adjusted accordingly. The Plan establishes the District's "standard of service" in order to ascertain the District's current and future capacity. While the State Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines do not account for the local program needs of the District. The Growth Management Act and the school impact fee ordinance authorize the District to define its standard of service based on the District's specific needs. In general, the District's current standard provides that class size for grades K-2 should not exceed 24 students and 17.3 students for our nine schools designated as serving high poverty areas, class size for grades 3-4 should not exceed 26 students; class size for grade 5 should not exceed 29 students. When averaged over the six elementary grades, this computes to 23.35 students per classroom. Class size for grades 6-12 should not exceed 30 students, with some subject areas restricted to lesser numbers. Decisions by current legislative actions may create the need for additional classrooms. (See Section III for more specific information.) The capacity of the schools in the District is calculated based on this standard of service and the existing inventory of facilities including transitional classrooms. The District's 2 2016-17 capacity was 14,717. The actual number of individual students was 15,945 as of October 1, 2016. (See Section V for more specific information.) The Capital Construction Plan shown in Section VI addresses the additions and proposed modernization to the District's existing facilities. The plan includes the replacement of five elementary schools and one middle school, construction of two new elementary schools, and acquisition of future school sites to accommodate growth. The new facilities are required to meet the projected elementary school class size reductions mandated by the State of Washington and student population increases generated by the large development areas within the Auburn School District. Three areas that have significant impact on the school district are the Lakeland South, Lea Hill, and the Auburn west hill areas of the district. There are other pockets of development that impact the District as well. The District completed a comprehensive review of all district facilities in October 2008. A Steering Committee made recommendations to the Board for capital improvements to existing facilities and replacement of seven schools over the next ten years. These recommendations led to a capital improvements levy and a bond issue that was placed on the ballot in March 2009. Both ballot measures were unsuccessful in March. The Board determined to rerun only the capital improvements levy in November 2009, which the voters approved. In the fall of 2011, the Board determined to move forward with the Auburn High School Modernization and Reconstruction Project and placed the project before the voters in February of 2012. The bond issue was supported by the community at nearly 57% approval rate, but was short of the super majority requirement of 60%. In March of 2012, the Board determined to rerun the bond in November of 2012. In November 2012, the bond passed at 62%. The project was completed during the summer of 2016. In the spring of 2016, the Board determined to move forward with the replacement of six schools and the construction of two new elementary schools. The project was placed before the voters in November 2016 and the bond passed at 62.83%. The first of the projects, the replacement of Olympic Middle School, is scheduled to start construction in March 2018. The School Impact Fee Ordinances adopted by King County, the City of Auburn and the City of Kent provide for the assessment of impact fees to assist in meeting some of the fiscal impacts incurred by a district experiencing growth and development. Section VII sets forth the proposed school impact fees for single family and multi-family dwelling units. The student generation factors have been developed using the students who actually attend school in the Auburn School District from single family and multi-family developments constructed in the last five years. There have been dramatic changes in the student generation factors for single and multi-family in the past five years. The District plans to carefully monitor the numbers over the next several years to determine if this is a trend or an anomaly. The method of collecting the data is with the use of GIS mapping software, data from King County and Pierce County GIS, and integration of the mapping with student data from the District's student data system. This method gives the District actual student generation numbers for each grade span for identified developments. This data is contained in Appendix A.3. 3 Auburn School District No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2017 through 2023 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Listed below is a summary level outline of the changes from the 2016 Capital Facilities Plan that are a part of the 2017 Plan. The changes are noted by Section for ease of reference. Section I Executive Summary A. Updated to reflect new information within the Plan. B. Summary level list of changes from previous year. Section II Enrollment Projections Updated projections. See Appendices A.1 & A.2. Section III Standard of Service A. Reduction of maximum K-2 class size from 18.23 to 17.3 students at 9 elementary schools designated as serving high poverty areas in 2016-17. Maximum K-2 class sizes remains at 24 students at the remaining 5 elementary schools. B. Maximum third and fourth grade class size remains at 26 students. C. Maximum 5th grade class size remains at 29 students. Section IV Inventory of Facilities A. Add 1 portable at Evergreen Heights Elementary School, B. Add 1 portable at Gildo Rey Elementary School. C. Add 1 portable at Lakeland Hills Elementary School. D. Add 1 portable at Auburn Mountainview High School. Section V Pupil Capacity The four portables to be placed in August 2017 are needed to accommodate enrollment increases. 4 Auburn School District No,408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2017 through 2023 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Impact Fees CHANGES TO IMPACT FEE DATA ELEMENTS 2016 to 2017 CPF CPF DATA ELEMENTS 2016 2017 EXPLANATION Student Generation Factors Single Family Consistent with King County Ordinance 11621, Elementary 0.2260 0.1930 Student Generation Factors are calculated Middle School 0.0820 0.0770 by the school district based on district Sr. High 0.0940 0.0730 records of average actual student generation Multi-Family rates for new developments constructed Elementary 0.0720 0.1030 over the last five years. Middle School 0.0220 0.0310 Sr. High 0.0440 0.0440 School Construction Costs Elementary $48,500,000 $48,500,000 From replacement school cost estimate in May 2016, Site Acquisition Costs Cost per acre $413,463 $434,136 Updated estimate based on 5% annual inflation. Area Cost Allowance Boeckh index $213.23 $213.23 Updated to projected SPI schedule. (July 2016) Match % -State 63,83% 63.29% Updated to current SPI schedule (May 2017) Match % - District 36.89% 36.71% Computed District Average AV Single Family $269,764 $292,035 Updated from March 2017 King County Dept of Assessments data, Multi-Family $113,408 $127,147 Updated from March 2017 King County Dept of Assessments data using average AV for apartments and condominiums. Debt Sery Tax Rate $1.59 $2.65 Current Fiscal Year GO Bond Int Rate 3.27% 3.95% Current Rate (Bond Buyers 20 Index 3-14) Section VIII Appendices Appendix A 1 - Updated enrollment projections from October 1, 2016 Appendix A 2 - Updated enrollment projections with anticipated buildout schedule from April 2017 Appendix A 3 -Student Generation Survey April 2017 5 Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2017 through 2023 Section II Enrollment Projections Auburn School District No.408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2017 through 2023 ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS The Auburn School District uses a modified cohort survival model to project future enrollment for all of the District's operations. Table 11.1 is an extract from the comprehensive projection model found in Appendix A 2 titled "CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Enrollment Projections". This Table shows the anticipated enrollment for the next six years based on the previous six year history of the District under the assumptions set forth in the comprehensive projections, Appendix A.1, and the projection for additional students generated from new developments in the district as shown in Appendix A.2. TABLE ASD ENROLLMENT 11.1 PROJECTIONS (April 2017) 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20..... 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 GRADE Actual Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected KDG 1237 1281 1331 1383 1430 1474 1516 1 1210 1292 1342 j 1395 1441 1485 1528 2 1300 1242 1331 1383 1430 1473 1516 3 1317 1321 1270 1359 1406 1450 1492 4 1237 1341 1351 1302 1387 1430 1472 5 1 1199 1260 1370 1381 1326 1408 1 1451 K -5 7500 7737 7995 8203 8420 8720 8975 6 1152 1196 1263 1375 1382 1324 1403 7 1132 1173 1224 1292 1399 1403 1343 8 1108 1146 1193 1245 1309 1413 1415 6-8 3392 3515 3680 3912 4090 4140 4161 9 1261 1258 1302 1353 1400 1461 1564 10 1248 '.. 1273 1275 1323 1367 1411 1471 11 1318 1239 1270 1275 1317 1358 1401 12 1226 1396 1323 1357 1356 1395 1435 9 - 12 5053 5166 5170 5308 5440 5625 5871 TOTALS 15.945 16.418 16.845 17.423 1 17,950 1 18,485 19,007 GRADES K-12 Actual Projected Projected Projected Proiected Projected Projected 17500 7737 7995 8203 8420 8720 8975 - . 3392 3515 3680 3912 4090 4140 4161 9-12,, 5053 5166 5170 5308 5440 5625 5871 K-12. 15,945 16,418 16,845 17,423 17,950 18,485 19,007 7 Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2017 through 2023 Section III Standard of Service Auburn School District No.408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2017 through 2023 STANDARD OF SERVICE The School Impact Fee Ordinances adopted by King County, the City of Auburn and the City of Kent indicate that each school district must establish a "Standard of Service"in order to ascertain the overall capacity to house its projected student population. The Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage "capacity"guidelines for computing state funding support. The fundamental purpose of the SPI guidelines is to provide a vehicle to equitably distribute state matching funds for school construction projects. By default these guidelines have been used to benchmark the district's capacity to house its student population. The SPI guidelines do not make adequate provision for local district program needs, facility configurations, emerging educational reform, or the dynamics of each student's educational program. The Auburn School District Standard of Service addresses those local considerations that require space in excess of the SPI guidelines. The effect on the space requirements for both permanent and relocatable facilities is shown below for each grade articulation pattern. Conditions that may result in potential space needs are provided for information purposes without accompanying computations. OVERVIEW The Auburn School District operates fourteen elementary schools housing 7,500 students in grades K through 5. The four middle schools house 3,392 students in grades 6 through 8. The District operates three comprehensive senior high schools and one alternative high school, housing 5,053 students in grades 9 through 12. CLASS SIZE The number of pupils per classroom determines the number of classrooms required to house the student population. Specialists create additional space needs. Class sizes are subject to collective bargaining agreements. Changes to class size agreements can have significant impact on available space. The current pupil/teacher limit across all elementary programs is an average of 23.35 students per teacher. Consistent with this staffing limit, room capacities are set at 23.35 students per room at grades K-5. At grades 6- 12 the limit is set at 30 pupils per room. The SPI space allocation for each grade articulation level, less the computed reduction for the Auburn School District Standard of Service, determines the District's capacity to house projected pupil populations. These reductions are shown below by grade articulation level. ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS STRUCTURED LEARNING FOR DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates a structured learning program for students with moderate to severe disabilities at the elementary school level which currently uses eleven classrooms to provide for 107 students. The housing requirements for this program are provided for in the SPI space guidelines. No loss of capacity is expected unless population with disabilities grows at a disproportionate rate compared to total elementary population. ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR The Auburn School District operates an adaptive behavior program for students with behavior disabilities at the elementary school level. The program uses one classroom to provide for seven students. The housing requirements for this program exceed the SPI space allocations by one classroom. Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 room @ 23.35 each = (23) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 23.35 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss = (23) 9 Auburn School District No.408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2017 through 2023 STANDARD OF SERVICE SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program at the elementary level for special education students requiring instruction to address their specific disabilities. Fourteen standard classrooms are required to house this program. The housing requirements for this program exceed the SPI space guidelines by seven standard classrooms. Continued loss of capacity is expected as growth in program is larger than the total elementary population. Loss of Permanent Capacity 7 rooms @ 23.35 each = (163) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 23.35 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss = (163) NATIVE AMERICAN RESOURCE ROOM The Auburn School District operates one resource room to support the education of Native American students at the elementary level. One standard classroom is fully dedicated to serve these students. Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 room @ 23.35 each = (23) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 23.35 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss = (23) HEAD START The Auburn School District operates a Head Start program for approximately 114 pre-school aged children in six sections of 1/2 day in length. The program is housed at three elementary schools and utilizes three standard elementary classrooms and auxiliary office spaces. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 3 rooms @ 23.35 each = (70) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 23.358 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss = (70) EARLY CHILDHOOD SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates a pre-school program for young children below age five with disabilities. This program is housed at seven different elementary schools and currently uses 10 standard classrooms. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 10 rooms @ 23.35 each = (234) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 23.35 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss = (234) READING LABS The Auburn School District operates a program for students needing remediation and additional language arts instruction. These programs utilize non-standard classroom spaces if available in each elementary school. Four elementary schools do not have non-standard rooms available, thus they are housed in a standard classroom, The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 23.35 each = (93) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 23.35 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss = (93) 10 Auburn School District No.408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2017 through 2023 STANDARD OF SERVICE MUSIC ROOMS The Auburn School District elementary music programs require one acoustically modified classroom at each school for music instruction. The housing requirements are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 14 rooms @ 23.35 each = (327) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 23.35 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss = (327) ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at the elementary school level for students learning English as a second language. This program requires fourteen standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 14 rooms @ 23.35 each = (327) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 23.35 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss = (327) SECOND GRADE TOSA PROGRAM The Auburn School District provides a TOSA reading specialist program for eight highly impacted elementary schools. This pullout model provides direct instruction to students who are not at grade level and do not receive other services. This program requires eight standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines, Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 rooms @ 23.35 each = (187) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 23.35 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss = (187) ELEMENTARY LEARNING SPECIALIST PROGRAM The Auburn School District provides a learning specialist program to increase literacy skills for first and second graders. This program model was originally created from the 1-728 funds and currently has the specialist going into existing teacher classrooms, as well as pulling out students into designated classrooms. The district is utilizing classrooms at all fourteen elementary schools. Loss of Permanent Capacity 14 rooms @ 23.35 each = (327) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 23.35 each = 0 Total Capacity Lass = (327) EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM The Auburn School District provides an Early Childhood Education Assistance Program to meet local needs for disadvantaged students. The State has funded an increase of 24 ECEAP seats. This program will require two new classrooms for 2015-16. Loss of Permanent Capacity 3 rooms @ 23.35 each = (70) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 23.35 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss = (70) 11 Auburn School District No.408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2017 through 2023 STANDARD OF SERVICE MIDDLE SCHOOLS SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program for each grade at the middle school level. This is to accommodate special education students needing remedial instruction to address their specific disabilities. Eight classrooms are required at the middle school level to provide for approximately 316 students. The housing requirements for this program are not entirely provided for in the SPI space guidelines. ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District offers a self-contained program for students with moderate to severe behavior disabilities. The program is housed at one of the middle schools and uses two classrooms. One of the two classrooms for this program are provided for in the SPI space allocations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 rooms @ 30 each = (30) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (30) STRUCTURED LEARNING CENTER AND DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates five structured learning classrooms at the middle school level for students with moderate to severe disabilities and one developmentally disabled classroom for students with profound disabilities. Two of the five classrooms for this program are provided for in the SPI space allocations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 3 rooms @ 30 each = (90) Lass of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (90) NATIVE AMERICAN RESOURCE ROOM The Auburn School District operates one resource room to support the education of Native American students at the middle school level. One standard classroom is fully dedicated to serve these students. Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 room @ 30 each = (30) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (30) MIDDLE SCHOOL COMPUTER LABS The Auburn School District operates a minimum of one computer lab at each of the four middle schools. This program utilizes a standard classroom. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 30 each = (120) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (120) ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at the middle school level for English Language Learner students. This program requires four standard classrooms that are not provide for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 30 each = (120) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (120) 12 Auburn School District No..408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2017 through 2023 STANDARD OF SERVICE ROOM UTILIZATION The Auburn School District provides a comprehensive middle school program that includes elective options in special interest areas. Facilities to accommodate special interest activities are not amenable to standard classroom usage. The district averages 95% utilization of all available teaching stations, SPI Report#3 dated 12/14/11 identifies 148 teaching stations available in the mid-level facilities. The utilization pattern results in a loss of approximately 8 teaching stations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 rooms @ 30 each = (240) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (240) SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS NATIVE AMERICAN RESOURCE ROOM The Auburn School District operates one resource room to support the education of Native American students at the high school level. One standard classroom is fully dedicated to serve these students. Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 room @ 30 each = (30) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (30) SENIOR HIGH COMPUTER LABS The Auburn School District operates two computer labs at each of the senior high schools. This program utilizes two standard classrooms at comprehensive high schools and one at West Auburn. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 7 rooms @ 30 each = (210) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (210) ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at three comprehensive high schools for English Language Learner students. This program requires three standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 3 rooms @ 30 each = (90) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (90) ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District offers a self-contained program for students with moderate to severe behavior diabilities. The program is housed at one of the high schools and uses one classroom. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space allocations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 rooms @ 30 each = (30) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (30) 13 Aultum School District No.408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2017 through 2023 STANDARD OF SERVICE STRUCTURED LEARNING CENTER PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates nine structured learning center classrooms for students with moderate to severe disabilities. This program requires five standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 5 rooms @ 30 each = (150) Loss of Temporary Capacity D rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (150) SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program at the senior high level for special education students requiring instruction to address their specific learning disabilities. The current high school program requires 11 classrooms to provide program to meet educational needs of the students. The SPI space guidelines provide for one of the 10 teaching stations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 10 rooms @ 30 each = (300) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (300) PERFORMING ARTS CENTERS Auburn High School includes 25,000 square feet used exclusively for a Performing Arts Center. The SPI Inventory includes this space when computing unhoused student capacity. This space was not intended for, nor is it usable for, classroom instruction. It was constructed to provide a community center for the performing arts. Using SPI capacity guidelines, 25,000 square feet computes to 208 unhoused students or 8.33 classrooms. Loss of Permanent Capacity 8.33 rooms @ 30 each = (250) ROOM UTILIZATION The Auburn School District provides a comprehensive high school program that includes numerous elective options in special interest areas. Facilities to accommodate special interest activities are not amenable to standard classroom usage. The district averages 95% utilization of all available teaching stations. There are 185 teaching stations available in the senior high facilities. The utilization pattern results in a loss of approximately 10 teaching stations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 10 rooms @ 30 each = (300) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (300) 14 Auburn School District No.408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2017 through 2023 STANDARD OF SERVICE STANDARD OF SERVICE COMPUTED TOTALS ELEMENTARY Loss of Permanent Capacity (1,845) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (1,845) MIDDLE SCHOOL Loss of Permanent Capacity (630) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (630) SENIOR HIGH Loss of Permanent Capacity (1,360) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (1,360) TOTAL Loss of Permanent Capacity (3,835) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (3,835) 15 Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2017 through 2023 Section IV Inventory of Facilities Auburn School District No.408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2017 through 2023 INVENTORY OF FACILITIES Table IVA shows the current inventory of permanent district facilities and their OSPI rated capacities. Table IV.2 shows the number and location of each portable unit by school. The district uses relocatable facilities to: 1. provide interim housing in school attendance areas uniquely impacted by increasing school populations that would otherwise require continual redistricting, 2 make space available for changing program requirements and offerings determined by unique student needs, and 3, provide housing to cover district needs until permanent facilities can be financed and constructed. Relocatable facilities are deemed to be interim, stop gap measures that often place undesirable stress on existing physical plants. Core facilities (i.e. gymnasiums, restrooms, kitchens, labs, lockers, libraries, etc.) are not of sufficient size or quantity to handle the increased school population served by adding relocatable classrooms. Table Permanent Facilities District School Facilities IV @ OSPI Rated Capacity (March 2017) Building Capacity Acres Address Elementary Schools Washlnaton Elementary 486 5 40 20 E Street Northeast,Auburn WA, 98002 Terminal Park Elementary 408 6.70 1101 D Street Southeast,Auburn WA, 95002 _ Dick Scobee Elementary 477 10.50 1031 14th Street Northeast,Auburn WA, 98002 Pioneer Elementary 441 8.30 2301 M Street Southeast, Auburn WA 98002 Chinook Elementary 440 8,75 3502 Auburn Way South, Auburn WA, 98092 Lea Hill Elementary 450 10.00 30908 124th Avenue Southeast,Auburn WA, 98092 Gildo Rev Elementary 551 10.00 1005 37th Street Southeast,Auburn WA. 98002 Everareen Heights Elem. 456 8,.09 5602 South 316th,Auburn WA. 98001 Alpac Elementary 497 10.60 310 Milwaukee Boulevard North, Pacific WA, 98047 Lake View Elementary 559 16.40 16401 Southeast 31 Bth Street, Auburn WA, 98092 Hazelwood Elementary 580 12.67 11815 Southeast 304th Street, Auburn WA. 98092 Ilalko Elementary _ 585 12.00 301 Oravetz Place Southeast, Auburn WA, 98092 ___.. Lakeland Hills Elementary 594 12.00 1020 Evergreen Way SE,Auburn WA, 98092 Arthur Jacobsen Elementary 614 10.00 29205 132n0 Street SE,Auburn WA, 98092 ELEMENTARY CAPACITY 7.138 Middle Schools Cascade Middle School 829 17.30 1015 24th Street Northeast Auburn WA 98002 Olympic Middle School 921 17.40 1825 K Street Southeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Rainier Middle School 843 26.33 30620 116th Avenue Southeast, Auburn WA, 98092 Mt. Baker Middle School 837 30.88 620 37th Street Southeast, Auburn WA. 98002 MIDDLE SCHOOL CAPACITY 3,430 Senior High Schools West Auburn HS _ 233 1 5.10 401 West Main Street, Auburn WA, 98001 Auburn HS _ 2.100 20.50 _ 711 East Main Street, Auburn WA, 98002 Auburn Riverside HS _ 1,387 33,00 501 Oravetz Road, Auburn WA, 98092 _.. Auburn Mountainview HS 1,443 40.00 28900 124t"Ave SE,Auburn WA, 98092 HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITY 5,164 TOTAL CAPACITY 1'5,732....... 17 vk.,g�{ �! � wa-�1',re,wn� �"� ��J6"` � "n�n•>•..�N"'� .� _....1...:r �1 I �i�a6 2i!!el !!! r11 t��G"'�i ;1 ewe u5 1,` �� �j' � Iv"fir t' f t 4311 I�, 1 MIS 111 f�a1y in IS 110 1H 9 d L � '`r a "� `r � .,i I � �,+ 1:4 fel MIS eJ !A!lel ��I �ul iii !i yypp��zPi i f i . ,� �d�" � 1 � (j C 1� tooji 02 'oil !!!'! III 1S° m M M mj Ia P Jsn r fl n A 9 r P ry � m "INS + fl fl q 4 V EN n 1 "a5� ��� ym A i r qq yy n A V y 4 aA" A77 c { Y q (y c � �1 p y t Y� ..`q4^ W µ 4 p.'htl y ! ¢�b�^Qxly`6 �� 1 1• .r1' , jrt a }y-.��4. 0 '" H eiy �r r �A {s. rc-�11!� tf� "'.�;�e�rr�4�pw`G e,v � t� '➢' > � �� `y.0 �''. �,,, ��CX ��1 wu �r a � � M 'A` (rr �a � '��� z�. It IPAI 117.1 'g v�a«,w j' di d .� t. a k.Y�!'''�v �* "h v ' 0d 7� "��r� "�. / ��pp �` �"�r✓�!rr +"� 1 i.. { � �L ti� w a Auburn School District No.408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2017 through 2023 INVENTORY OF FACILITIES TABLE I TEMPORARY/RELOCATABLE IV.2 FACILITIES INVENTORY (June 2017) Elementary Location 2017-18 2018-19 ''. 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-2023 2023-2024 Washington 5 5 6 6 6 6 6 Terminal Park 6 7 7 8 8 8 0 Dick Scobee 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 Pioneer 7 7 7 0 0 0 0 Chinook 6 7 7 7 0 0 0 Lea Hill 5 5 6 6 6 0 0 Gildo Rey 7 7 8 8 8 8 8 Evergreen Heights 5 5 6 6 6 6 6 Alpac 6 6 7 7 7 7 7 Lake View 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 Hazelwood 2 3 4 4 4 4 4 Ilalko 6 6 7 7 7 7 7 Lakeland Hills Elementary 7 7 7 8 8 8 8 Arthur Jacobsen Elementary 1 4 5 6 6 6 1 6 1 6 TOTAL UNITS 75 79 80 76 69 63 55 TOTAL CAPACITY 1,860 1,959 1,984 1,885 1,711 1,562 1 1,364 Middle School Location 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-2023 2023-2024 Cascade 0 0 1 1 2 2 2 ....Olympic 0 0 1 1 2 2 2 Rainier 5 6 7 8 9 9 9 ''.Mt. Baker 9 10 11 11 11 11 11 TOTAL UNITS 14 16 20 21 24 24 24 TOTAL CAPACITY 420 480 600 630 720 720 720 Sr. High School Location 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-2023 12023-2024 West Auburn 0 0 1..... 1 1 1 1 Auburn High School 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 Auburn High School -*TAP 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Auburn Riverside 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 Auburn Mountainview 4 4 5 5 5 6 6 TOTAL UNITS 18 18 20 21 21 22 22 TOTAL CAPACITY 540 540 600 630 630 660 660 'TAP-Transition Assistance Program for 18-21 year old students with special needs. COMBINED TOTAL UNITS 107 113 120 118 114 109 101 COMBINED TOTAL CAPACITY 2.820 2.979 3,184 3,145 3,061 2,942 2,744 19 Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2017 through 2023 Section V Pupil Capacity Auburn School District No,408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2017 through 2023 PUPIL CAPACITY While the Auburn School District uses the SPI inventory of permanent facilities as the data from which to determine space needs, the District's educational program requires more space than that provided for under the formula. This additional square footage is converted to numbers of pupils in Section III, Standard of Service. The District's capacity is adjusted to reflect the need for additional space to house its programs. Changes in the capacity of the district recognize new funded facilities, The combined effect of these adjustments is shown on Line B in Tables V 1 and V.2 below. Table V.1 shows the Distict's capacity with relocatable units included and Table V.2 without these units. Table VA Capacity WITH relocatables 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 A. SPI Capacity 15,732 15,732 15,732 15,732 16,382 17,032 17,032 A.1 SPI Capacity-New Elem 650 650 B. Capacity Adjustments 1,015)', (856) (651) (690) (774) (893) (1,091) C. Net Capacity 14,717 14,876 15,081 15.692 16,258 16,139 15,941 D. ASD Enrollment 16,418 16,845 17,423 17,950' 18,465 19,007 19,525 31 E. ASD Surplus/Deficit (1,701) (1,969) (2,342) (2,258) (2,207) (2,868) (3,584) CAPACITY ADJUSTMENTS Include Relocatable 2,820 2,979 3,184 3,145 3,061 2,942 2,744 2/ Exclude SOS 14 3,835) 3,835) (3,835) (3,835) (3,835) (3,835) (3,835 Total Adjustments (1,015) (856) (651) (690) (774) (893) (1,091) Table V.2 Capacity WITHOUT relocatables 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 A. SPI Capacity 15,732 15,732 15,732 15,732 16,382 17,032 17,032 A.1 SPI Capacity-New Elem 650 650 B. Capacity Adjustments (3,835) 3,835 3,835 3,835 (3,835) (3,835) 3,835 C. Net Capacity 11,897 11.897 11,897 12,547 13,197 13,197 13,197 D. ASD Enrollment 16,418 16,845 17,423 17,950 18,465 19,007 19,525 31 E. ASD Surplus/Deficit (4,521) (4,948) (5,526) (5,403) (5,268) (5,810) (6,328) CAPACITY ADJUSTMENTS 2/ Exclude SOS 14) (3,835 (3,835) (3,835) 3.835) (3,835) (3.835) (3,835) Total Adjustments (3,835) (3,835) (3,835) (3,835) (3,835) (3,835) (3,835) 1/ New facilities shown in 2019-20 through 2023-24 are funded by the 2016 School Bond Issue. 2/ The Standard of Service represents 24.38%of SPI capacity. When new facilities are added the Standard of Service computations are decreased to 22.52% of SPI capacity. 3/ Students beyond the capacity are accommodated in other spaces(commons, library,theater, shared teaching space), 21 Auburn School District No.408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2017 through 2023 PERMANENT FACILITIES PUPIL CAPACITY SPI Rated Capacity (March 2017) A. Elementary Schools Building 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 Washington 486 486 486 486 486 486 486 Terminal Park 408 408 408 408 408 408 408 Dick Scobee 477 477 477 477 477 477 477 Pioneer 441 441 441 441 441 441 441 Chinook 440 440 440 440 440 440 440 Lea Hill 450 450 450 450 450 450 450 Gildo Rey 551 551 551 551 551 551 551 Evergreen Heights 456 456 456 456 456 456 456 '....Alpac 497 497 497 497 497 497 497 Lake View 559 559 559 559 559 559 559 ''..Hazelwood 580 580 580 580 580 580 580 ''.11alkc 585 585 585 585 585 585 585 Lakeland Hills 594 594 594 594 594 594 594 Arthur Jacobsen 614 614 614 614 614 614 614 Elementary#15 650 650 650 650 Elementary#16 650 650 650 ELEMENTARY CAPACITY 7.138 7,138 7,138 1. 7 788 1 8,438 8,438 8,438 B. Middle Schools Building 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 Cascade 829 829 829 829 829 829 829 Olympic 921 921 921 921 921 921 921 Rainier 843 843 843 843 843 843 843 Mt.. Baker 837 837 837 837 837 837 837 MIDDLE SCHOOL CAPACITY 3,430 3,430 3.430 3,430 3,430 3,430 3.430 C. Senior High Schools Buildinq 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 West Auburn 233 233 233 233 233 233 233 Auburn 2,101 2,101 2,101 2,101 2,101 2,101 2,101 Auburn Riverside 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 Auburn Mountainview 1,443 1,443 1,443 1.443 11443 1,443 1,443 HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITY 5,164 5,164 5,164 53164 5,164 5,164 5,164 COMBINED CAPACITY 15,732 1 15,732 1 15,732 1 16,382 17,032 17,03? 17,032 22 Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2017 through 2023 Section VI Capital Construction Plan Auburn School District No,408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2017 through 2023 CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN The formal process used by the Board to address current and future facility needs began in 1974 with the formation of a community wide citizens committee. The result of this committee's work was published in the document titled 'Guidelines for Development.' In 1985 the Board formed a second Ad Hoc citizens committee to further the work of the first and address the needs of the District for subsequent years. The work of this committee was published in the document titled 'Directions for the Nineties.' In 1995 the Board commissioned a third Ad Hoc citizens committee to make recommendations for improvements to the District's programs and physical facilities. The committee recommendations are published in the document titled 'Education Into The Twenty-First Century-- A Community Involved.' The 1995 Ad Hoc committee recommended the District develop plans for the implementation, funding, and deployment of technology throughout the District's programs. The 1996 Bond proposition provided funding to enhance the capacity of each facility to accommodate technological applications. The 1998 Capital Levy provided funding to further deploy technology at a level sufficient to support program requirements in every classroom and department. In 2005 and 2014, replacement technology levies were approved to continue to support technology across all facets of the District's teaching, learning and operations. In addition to the technology needs of the District, the Ad Hoc committee recognized the District must prepare for continued student enrollment growth As stated in their report, "the District must pursue an appropriate high school site as soon as possible." The Ad Hoc recommendation included commentary that the financing should be timed to maintain consistent rates of tax assessments. A proposition was approved by the voters on April 28, 1998 that provided $8,000,000 over six years to address some of the technology needs of the District, and $5,000,000 to provide funds to acquire school sites. During the 1997-98 school year, a Joint District Citizen's Ad Hoc Committee was appointed by the Auburn and Dieringer School Boards to make recommendations on how best to serve the school population from an area that includes a large development known as Lakeland South, Lakeland South at that time was immediately adjacent to the southern boundary of the Auburn School District. On June 16, 1998, the Ad Hoc Committee presented its recommendation at a joint meeting of the Auburn and Dieringer Boards of Directors. On June 22, 1998, the Auburn School Board adopted Resolution No. 933 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries of the District in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. On June 23, 1998, the Dieringer School Board adopted a companion Resolution No. 24-97-98 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. These actions resulted in the transfer of an area from Dieringer to Auburn containing most of the Lakeland South development and certain other undeveloped properties. Property for the third comprehensive high school was acquired in 1999. The Board placed the proposition to construction a new high school on the ballot four times. Each election was extremely close to passing. After the fourth failure a community meeting was held and from that meeting the Board determined need for further community study. In April of 2002, the Board formed a fifth citizen's Ad Hoc committee to address the following two items and make recommendations to the Board in the Fall of 2002: a. A review of the conclusion and recommendations of 1985 and 1995 Ad Hoc Committees related to accommodating high school enrollment growth. This included the review of possible financing plans for new facilities. b. Develop recommendations for accommodating high school enrollment growth for the next 10 years if a new senior high school is not built. 24 Auburn School District No.408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2017 through 2023 CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN This committee recommended the Board place the high school on the ballot for the fifth time in February 2003. The February election approved the new high school at 68.71% yes votes. The school opened in the fall of 2005. In the fall of 2003, the Board directed the administration to begin the planning and design for Elementary#13 and Elementary#14. In the fall of 2004, the Board passed Resolution No 1054 to place two elementary schools on the ballot in February 2005. The voters approved the ballot measure in February of 2005 at 64.72%. Lakeland Hills Elementary (Elementary#13) opened in the fall of 2006. Arthur Jacobsen Elementary (Elementary#14) is located in the Lea Hill area and opened in the fall of 2007. These two elementary schools were built to accommodate the housing growth in Lakeland Hills and Lea Hill areas of the school district. In the 2004-05 school year, the Board convened a sixth Citizen's Ad Hoc committee to again study and make recommendations about the future impacts in the District. One of the areas of study was the need for New Facilities and Modernization. The committee made a number of recommendations including school size, the need for a new middle school, and to begin a capital improvements program to modernize or replace facilities based upon criterion. During the 2005-06 school year, a Joint District Citizen's Ad Hoc Committee was appointed by the Auburn and Kent School Boards to make recommendations on how best to serve the school population that will come from an area that includes a number of projected developments in the north Auburn valley. On May 17, 2006, the Ad Hoc Committee presented its recommendation at a joint meeting of the Auburn and Kent Boards of Directors On June 14, 2006, the Kent School Board adopted Resolution No 1225 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries of the District in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. On June 26, 2006, the Auburn School Board adopted a companion Resolution No. 1073 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. These actions resulted in the transfer of an area from the Kent School District to the Auburn School District effective September 29, 2006, In October of 2008, after two years of review and study, a Steering Committee made recommendations to the Board regarding the capital improvements program to modernize or replace facilities as recommended by the 2004-05 Citizen's Ad Hoc Committee. These recommendations, based on specific criteria, led to the Board placing a school improvement bond and capital improvements levy on the ballot in March 2009. Voters did not approve either measure that would have updated 24 facilities and replaced three aging schools, The Board decided to place only a six- year Capital Levy on the ballot in November of 2009, which passed at 55.17%. The levy funded $46.4 million of needed improvement projects at 24 sites over the following seven school years. Planning for the replacement of aging schools was started with educational specifications and schematic design process for the replacement of Auburn High School. The District acquired a site for a future high school in 2008 and a second site for a future middle school in 2009. The District also continued efforts to acquire property around Auburn High School, The Special Education Transition Facility opened in February of 2010. This facility is designed for students with disabilities that are 18 to 21 years old, In the November 2012 election, the community supported the $110 million bond issue for the Auburn High School Modernization and Reconstruction Project at 62%. Construction began in February 2013. The entire new building was occupied by Auburn High School students and staff in the fall of 2015, with site improvements being completed during the 2015/16 school year. 25 Auburn School District No.408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2017 through 2023 CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN In January 2015, a citizen's ad hoc committee was convened by direction of the Board to address growth and facilities. The major recommendations were to construct two new elementary schools in the next four years and to acquire 3 new elementary school sites as soon as possible. In the November 2016 election, the community supported the $456 million bond issue for the replacement of six schools and the construction of two new elementary schools at 62.83%. Construction for the replacement of Olympic Middle School is scheduled to begin in March 2018. Within the six-year period, the District is projecting 3,062 additional students. This increase in student population along with anticipated class-size reductions, will require the construction of two new elementary schools and acquiring three new elementary school sites during the six-year window. In addition to new and replacement school construction, this District needs to address several major construction projects to accommodate enrollment growth and continued District use. These projects include improvements at the Support Services Center, Transportation Center, replacement of or improvements to the roof at Auburn Memorial Stadium, boiler replacement at Auburn Mountainview High School, and energy management system replacement at Auburn Riverside High School. The table below illustrates the current capital construction plan for the next six years. The exact timelines are wholly dependent on the rate of growth in the school age population. 2017-23 Capital Construction Plan (May 2017) Projected Fund Project Timelines Project Funded Cost Source 17-18 18-19 19-20 20-21 21-22 22-23 23-24 All Facilities - 2013 Technology Yes $22,000,000 6 Year XX XX XX Modernization Cap. Levy Portables Yes $2,500,000 Impact XX XX XX XX XX 1/ Fees Property Purchase - Bond 1/ 3 New Elementaries Yes $14 900 000Impact Fee XX XX XX XX XX XX XX Multiple Facility _ Cap. Levy Improvements Yes $46,400,00o Impact Fee XX XX XX .-.-.--.--.-...-----------....------------------------------ Elementary#15 Yes $46,500,000 Bond XX XX 1/ Impact Fee plan const open Elementary 416 Yes $48,500,000 Bond XX XX XX 1/ Impact Fee plan const open _ Replacement of five Yes $242,500,000 Band XX XX �XX XX XX XX XX 1/ Elementary Schools plan plan const const const const const Replacement of one Yes $78,000,000 Band XX XX XX Schoo 1/ Middle l plan const I open 1/ These funds may be secured through a combination of the 2016 Bond Issue,sale of real Property,impact fees,and state matching funds, The District currently is eligible for state matching funds for new construction at the elementary school level and for modernization at the elementary and middle school levels. 26 Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2017 through 2023 Section VI Impact Fees a N M NE Lp O O h � N m O O N 1.. E O E O LL N O O N o LL (O O O IMO O LL O p O LL In O O y U _ N O O U 'L V 0i m fD U .P N O O ly E o b E r° E b E a v N M O N LL t0 O O tl!E�� m LL O O p N LL W n m N LL ....V O O O 1 E a 0 0E o 0 0 -E o 0 0 of o o m m v rn m m V m m VFj m m LL L0' 11 N lL 2 N q m Z cc E o 0 0 $ E O O o E o 0 0 m U' LL rn n n C7 LL rn n n � LL m n r � 's m r r � a mdoo romcoo O M � C ADC � � C000 in Oi000 z we � y $.�. rn e`Y'i' 20 m -cu UJ (n m O O V o .. � QLL o cLL Q, 0 - o W UJ �' h in W UJ a v v v m v t o e e N O Qt.. N N O O V O N C V V U d l0 N 10 �' N U N N N LL ' m amao "' 2 °' € � mmm 2l° E � 000 m J oLL m W m d o 0 0 o W a m o 0 0 o d N m m � QH u U € ate � E.F- H x < a is cc c> 0 CL w ® Gof o a OEn OF» Con � oo � �- �mioo � d orn Q m V m LN UJ 0 w � V W LL (n N y U O Z2 U x LL f` L^ pin Om Z i} x x W O o.¢ n m H � a oo yN o00 Ex m N Vl O - 0 0 0 p - N 0 0 0 � U O N O O 4 y y 2 min N V U � � U � » �» U m 00 mU000 R x o am o0 m a O y Q w `° f' m m u1 U = o o W a s w c� U V 3 .3 CN Lq ¢ D Uy N N r Z LL b co Q ii uy m u rn rn C p�. ay V U m y t ¢ 10Y u t' p i° v' y u t W A Y CL v ti € � v = z. € rr wa = f Ex w w whin d LL w f`n UA LL w 20 CO LL w «y e 1 U LL n % m j a E b d N U LL'N q % N N � N K m v m m o ro rn Q� N O ty O 10 M V O O) N p Yip:; pJ 4Z � 10 O O " T W N E9 N r � O W Kp IL ? Y M fA fA f9 f9 4y O y 1 Z N Z W O W F L LL L LL T !(f C O C a N a C M M :a M Y1 r 7 F" .�- 0] Q LL Q a j C W (O [O f0 C N M tD O 4b 7 > Y (O Of M V N M q t0 N M N to coUl N m ti a uma ; ❑ vi'E m w of m 0 ci `o m ) Z U C � o Z W d a ra" r" LL m o o Cj 12 W O o ¢ ¢ O O v m U U U ^ '- o. 'E 'E m m m y °ww LL aZ a w < < C A °� - ° - d c d W a> '« io ._. LL w H 1° ano p U u it to E ?' N :A A in w E % w w �- LLL) oii ina H � � LL LL � u44. 2 j � o o upi OM o o j y C m N LLa m o � o N v m `� m � v oMry r Nm m 'poo 0 j O a m M J aU N N N � FA O po p m r o n a rc� Z` o M M N a M o o N N W N O m O M O N p O m T O V m m N n N N Q O E E U N N m Mf�i N W W W m � J O r O C U OI H M O O m S O 10 O V O p M N n N OI Q1 p O O O h O� C d O W a tO O m 0 O N. m M_�_�O N O ('N1 N n N NN M j O O O m m J LL O O m m v a o m n N a M v M U en w Q z° W M z a N C)1 e eLL M in o° O U m m v rn t+1 (1J J W Y O' m N O p t0 Of D7 h O N f0 M N fA M J O N N M N na Q m L m O U O c O 0 N r L N n LLLL � o a r �oo "' O O O w 0 (/1 N U N 5m p Z Q r ¢ E Q � W y J L N H F o N E W U -E C L a s S! N N C N 6 U O U O w Q 3 d a E a a E a Q N o 0 0 d w W U y (q a fn N N 9 d ry E O N J } N N N (~J E E O IlJ C -R O ❑ N lll J M 9m m :° �° c E a a w o of ? o m c °o o m m m Q w m N m m c LLLL a n > m > U (� @) W A Q O' T N a ❑ O O O LL C N N (O N O E 2 C N a a d U LL U N M N n m - a o 'er o � UU � cc m m m o imcn wE ¢ o E E E E m u2 : 20 0 U vJ CJ N C ¢ u ma tU Y u0 .� u af �O Q U n U 0 .0 U a O N 41 �'Q liLL a � � m � in � 4 F " d 'm 10 mad LL m m K LL v N LL E E LL c w o O c x ~ m LL W a n Q U to n y a fn u L L Q tq m a d m E E m N E E i0 w = n 0 w d' mzz . win a � � ao mm � � o oc7 y Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2017 through 2023 Section VIII Appendix Appendix A.1 - Student Enrollment Projections Appendix A.2 - CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Enrollment Projections Appendix A.3 - Student Generation Survey Appendix A.1 - Student Enrollment Projections Auburn School District #408 Student Enrollment Projections October 2016 Introduction The projective techniques give some consideration to historical and current data as a basis for forecasting the future. In addition,the `projector' must make certain assumptions about the operant variables within the data being used. These assumptions are"judgmental"by definition. Forecasting can be defined as the extrapolation or logical extension from history to the future, or from the known to the unknown. The attached tabular data reviews the history of student enrollment, sets out some quantitative assumptions, and provides projections based on these numerical factors. The projection logic does not attempt to weigh the individual sociological, psychological, economic, and political factors that are present in any demographic analysis and projection. The logic embraces the assumptions that whatever these individual factors have been in the past are present today, and will be in the future. It further moderates the impact of singular factors by averaging data over thirteen years and six years respectively. The results provide a trend, which reflects a long(13-year) and a short (6-year)base from which to extrapolate. Two methods of estimating the number of kindergarten students have been used. The first uses the average increase or decrease over the past 13 and 6-year time frame and adds it to each succeeding year. The second derives what the average percentage Auburn kindergartners have been of live births in King County for the past 5 years and uses this to project the subsequent four years. The degree to which the actuals deviate from the projections can only be measured after the fact. This deviation provides a point of departure to evaluate the effectiveness of the assumptions and logic being used to calculate future projections. Monitoring deviation is critical to the viability and credibility of the projections derived by these techniques. Tables nible I —Thirteen Year HisloryofOctober I f.^.'nrallmerrts—page 3 The data shown in this table is the baseline information used to project future enrollment. This data shows the past record of enrollment in the district on October 1 of each year. Table 2—Historical Factors Used in Proiertions - page 4 This table shows the three basic factors derived from the data in Table 1. These factors have been used in the subsequent projections. The three factors are: • Factor 1—Average Pupil Change Between Grade Levels This factor is sometimes referred to as the "holding power" or"cohort survival." It is a measure of the number of pupils gained or lost as they move from one grade level to the next. • Factor 2—Average Pupil Change by Grade Level This factor is the average change at each grade level over the 13 or 6-year period. • Factor 3—Auburn School District Kindergarten Enrollment as a Function of King County Live Births. This factor calculates what percent each kindergarten class was of the King County live births in the five previous years. From this information has been extrapolated the kindergarten pupils expected for the next four years. 1 Table 3...Proieclion ,Moderls—pages 5-13 This set of tables utilizes the above mentioned variables and generates several projections. The models are explained briefly below. ❑ Table 3.13 (pg 5)—shows a projection based on the 13-year average gain in kindergarten (Factor 2) and the 13-year average change between grade levels(Factor 1). The data is shown for the district as a whole. ❑ Table 3.6 (pg 5)—shows a projection using the same scheme as Table 3.13 except it shortens the historical data to only the most recent 6 years. ❑ Table 3.13A and 3.6A (pg 6)—uses the same factors above except Factor 3 is substituted for Factor 2. The kindergarten rates are derived from the King County live births instead of the average gain. ❑ Tables 3E.13,3E.6,3E.13A, 3E.6A (pg 7)—breaks out the K-5 grades from the district projection. Summary level data is provided for percentage gain and pupil gain by grade articulation. ❑ Tables 3MS.13, 3MS.6,3MS.13A,31VIS.6A (pg 8)—breaks out the 6-8 grades from the district projection. Summary level data is provided for percentage gain and pupil gain by grade articulation. ❑ Tables 3SH.13, 3SH.6, 3SH.13A, 3SH.6A (pg 9)—breaks out the 9-12 grades from the district projection. Summary level data is provided for percentage gain and pupil gain by grade articulation. ❑ Table 4(pg 10)—Collects the four projection models by grade group for ease of comparison. ❑ Table 5 (pgs 11-13)—shows how well each projection model performed when compared with actual enrollments. Data is provided in both number and percent formats for the past 13 years. Summary This year is the fifth consecutive year of an increase in enrollment after three consecutive years of declining enrollment. The increase of 282 students changes our historical average gain/loss in students. Over the past 6 years the average gain is now 1.62%annually,which equates to an average annual gain of 244 students. Using the cohort survival models,the data below is a summary of the range of variation between the four models. This data can be used for planning for future needs of the district. The models show changes in the next six years: • Elementary level show increases ranging from 971 to 1,300. (page 7) • Middle School level show increases ranging from 688 to 692. (page 8) • High School level show increases ranging from 692 to 774. (page 9) The models show these changes looking forward thirteen years: • Elementary level show increases ranging from 2,179 to 3.047. (page 7) • Middle School level show increases ranging from 1,289 to 1,536. (page 8) • High School level show increases ranging from 1,569 to 1,659. (page 9) This data does not factor new developments that are currently under construction or in the planning stages. 2 s N d 0 0 G O M O OO h N m tNO M 0 (O V W W O a a N N M p O N N W a> V' O Yi rn a �- mp r OpJ M fa r M N M h M m r W M N r m M N tha O O O m (O sO� N O V O t01 n V W N m N rn I' M M1 N M t0 M1 M N V' M N W 'n N rn W W W N rn .- W VI rn M Ir w N e r} O - am W rn < Nh O O N O W V' W M W W N W rn O Z - , W N NNI M1 W O m M M W V O V' O M - O O O N ' N ''., - 0 M �O N � a W W C fa r N .- m rn r N N �- M W I" M N fp M N M V M U y 0 W rn m W O W r O W V � ,,,,,I,m o M C rn W O M O M N V M M M M W W W m r V W O r W N ''.W N Ip O W M M1 W M M O) M 0 o W W Q N O O O O O O O O N N M ''.,,p N C () ('# O M n M N Nl N M V M IL o r� Z - rn W M N W cM N (s M O M W (MO �„ d"i 41 N N OMI f0 O V ti -a ONi m W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GS N N M M 10 O N N N N O M T r g O f:Y .., y W r n D M NM a M J 31 Q 'N a'P`':. ` m ly O W W M V W O N W W C W C',i} e W y O N W rn YJ W rn m N M O Z d 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M N N M j y ry �` O O N N O m N N trni O � W W i� .,.. T^ M fp r M 4J fp M N M LLJ M a h p .0 O y W O M M W M r f7 O N M r 0 W dl ,. ' O M M N M N N W M tW0 O t") a p 000mmoo � ' o � NMedv',- r- ; F (7 `8 } .;;; m oM W n mow MNA W M N O W W N V O (rnD OWI M N O V' h N O� yy }.W W CM') W M m O O O - O m V V K � m O O O O O O O O N A M M M :: m O N O N N N M N O .- V' � �- W � � ry M W r MWW MNM E c p o W m r W r r M r W N M N o E WONM ;: OM 10 , OM rn rn a °rn Moo o m MM �M' NWi - a � 0 a oa rn oov Ma o O W O V rn M W h M �O W M N O „ .. 3 � e m, (� O r N N OS W W ' N N O N r W o ®a C�fl 1 M WNO V W W rn rn O M p rn 1 N r O N M rn (p �j O O O O rn 0 0 0 - O M M M 0 Z O O �t N CJ y. � O N W O o o W M N M N M O ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, O O a m N W 40 M M N rn 40 V W M1 0) M N W�W El M1 WNW MWV NM R 10 (p W O M O N M r W W W p W 0 a W W N M M W W M4] Q 2 orn rnrn � rnOoo � � .M- o c� rn W W M W mrn m u� O W N ry ^ 3 N Oy NO p N� W W M1 O V' O W W ti N V W � OMM V' V' W MN r O m O m m m = N n hW W W N N r f0 CO 9 m ry l0 N W (a N V 40 M N M V M a 'w O] ❑ N M E' N W r W rn O e- N 'r U m Q O N YJ W M YJ W W W rn N Q '.,Y 0 ¢y0 . =a. IQ- W r r o s N O 0 O 0 O w07 < am � Tav n w < W> a eo o e -.R e o o e o o o o o o o o o e o o o o ao o o se o ~ J f0 f0 N V W N Of t0 O Y m M �8�p f0 M m N S [O P r ti �Ncpp tD v y�V M m+t M mp Y] M N N N Z W O W V N r m N M m M N N M m f0 m m m m M1 h .- .- N N N N V �0 V M q (O m ro 0 woo NYC W d' v v' vvavv vvv vri ri cSv c�i ri Ninv 6v avav V V V =tv < vfri H W Z J Z O O O c O W m c c c 0 7 04 JO ¢ W Q v v v v E 0 G) Z m J m OW 0 W '� D O m m N m N m ar- h �0 O N t'Ol N m mM1 N V N l0 N N N f0 m m N N m m M m N m Of O m V O N m �0 V m m N N e N N E ¢ J yZ mmr r mr mmm mmmmmmm mm mmmmm mmmm0000 — O cc w c p 7 O O u} m m m 0 m r O M N V N m m M M m M I N M h r V N N m m M M y Z O U) W = IR 1n V' O O V N N m t() N (O IA r h N N N M1 N W U ,� F M m 0 M1 O N m m h m m m O M m N O h m O O M O m N r r r m 0 m m m m N V OJ ,-' r NZZQm ' - - — — NN NNNNNNNNNNNN N N N N . . . N N N N N N N, � V y Y J S W M f0 R m m 0 N M V f0 m h m m 0 N M yy 0 m r m m 0 N m v h (O h m m O .- N O U O QQ LL OIL aD 0 m m m m m m m m m rn m m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 cc — O W' Z I11 0 ',,41Y M V N (O r m W O f1V M 4 f 3 f0 h W N O N lh C to (D r Z6 m O � N M p )- 0 Y Zlm m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 — — N N a w oU z O Z ✓+ = 4�. ee}y N m 0 0 0 m N M 0 .- m N O r M M f0 �- N m �p m m M1 4'l O r N O V M m mom_ W O w qy m M O O O M1 ^ N m t0 O N O m V V M m N M m i0 m r N (p O m 49 V O V m N N V m N O M M M N M m v UQ �- m V V f0 �0 N N m m m m m M1 h m m M1 fD r r m r M1 r r r r r r r h m m m m m m m m 06 .6 s J 2 p = c S � m S o V h V w O O N N M A n W N M O h m m n N V N S O OMi O M N O S T V H O O N V f0 M m M N O O m M m m m M V m m m i0 f0 m N O M1 r N WQ ry m m V m m m my N r - - V - m m` - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Z J N N (p V O M V m M V m m m O O m f0 M m N r r m M V O V N O h V O N O m r U W Q W 2 (p m m N S O M r M1 In O M r V m fD M N O r V O m r m M r m V O m 1!) M M m QQ h 1 H h m O f0 m W m m M1 m m 0 ' M1 M1 O M O O f0 m N 0 V r m N m m N m O m m O m N Q O J - M - - - m r m m m m m N f0 m N O N lV N N N N N N N V V N M V N 4N N N N 0 )- m — N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O U O j Qwww¢¢ m r m m o N M V wwwwwm m - mmm m m m S S N 00 O 00 O O O O — oW } m - - - — - - NNNNNNNNNNNO NO NO NO NO to J O h N N S VS N O N W O O O O Ci S V V f0 0 0 V O M M m N O v m r m V W L N — 00 O VV M (p h 0 (V fy f0 r m H ,.,. O W VNV N m M1 O � N lV IX} M W O OMD � N O ¢ G � m 4y4y4y4y J � � Y c'' V r c - m QCO N O N M V f0 m h m m 0 0 0 O N ), N M N m Y N M V f0 mIr m m O O N N C t O c W y M h 0 0 0 r N O M N 3 W N 2 O Lo m m m f0 4. O m V f . M m t0 41 V v f0 m r m t0 N V O m m Iq CY m M N `� O � � V � � NN � � WONVSOmd' � NN NfMImN ..-- O m -.N N .,NO W Qco J N M r c O Q N G O Q N O Q Q N ^ W m m O 0 0 0 U N W Y 0 0 �- N M V f0 m r m m p O N �O 6. M fop 0 W s N N n 0 O O M lh N O O O h W V O h N by � O M M1 W M1 � OC rn - W W W W W W - W - - - - � r .d' - y rn M1 - - - - - rn N N N O M N N M r M h M O W h W M M N W m W N V W {� O N W O rn W M1 h V M r pp W O pp W O N M C' M rn r N O h r NIW rn P d Q O N h M1 W �fl N V O W C W N O N w U d N - W W - W V W W W N O - N d N W - - - - - - - - - - c O � � � � .- .- (NQ � M r M d N O o m M O W M N h poj'm Z O N N M N N W h fD W W rn yj O� N O N y� W h M W N rn W - O W - - - v e v tp fl . N W W W W W p O V 6. N U W -� tD ttpp W W V N W W M1 W N W W �W.. o 0 W N W rn r rn rn [f N N O O N N W W d' O r d' W M M O M W d N O W h < a < C P W W M rn rn M d N W W W - h - W V a N - - b N V�- �- N a Z W h r r W V r o W N M W rn g m M yWjo W wavev `� `� avvvu� � u`oiv `ro xV u u �i � 0ovva - u 0M1° � r �- �- a- �- �- �- - - - � - - - - N O a N - - - - - - - - - - �- - - SP N b J ON M N W M M N O rn N N W W N W 6t O N N M N O W �p W W W N N rn h''q n W 7- K M V " ' M M N N W a N `_' .r� ry d N W O N o M N 0 0 Orni r W W WW W m 0 O N W W lMD N M1 W m m 0 yy r V M O o M aN a V V C' M M ! ! ^ ' M W ty < d N V .V- .C- .V- ^ M M M h ' < ',.m. N N r U) U � N W O rn r M1 h rn W rn r V' V' Qs d W Q N eeyy �fl V N O W Ql r W M W N (O r W r a ry - a - - - - - - - - - M fh N v a N V a a M N M M V - P M N n �_ VV M N N N O rn � W W N M1 N W T 3° M M •t M O M1 V V N W O1 M1 o 0 O N N M1 W {n N -W -W OJ mM M M1 VM- M M W M M W M N N W W (O(pp O d N - - - - - - H V M tl(Y V a N O O . r Q O � r ° O N N v M N h W W h M W M W h p (gyp W O N N r W M W W In r N M 0 N> M P M y Oy - - - - - N - - - N r. ry N V - - M -- -- -- -- P -- -- N - -- - M h� W V -L EL .- �.,. � N m M rn h W W W v r W N rn M V aWaYY � � rn 0 O rn O M O M V rn Q Zj�-a W N M M N M M N - - - O o O N_ G w W W W rnh � rn rnrn NN mimeo w = -' � rnoomrn myy � Wor Mr` e+ ' o O C C O Q r '..r O O r h 0 N N W W W W W.qq A ¢ M1 O O M1 M1 rn N N W W W W y Wy O O M O M rn W M O W V N q� 00 U W N M N XLJ d < N - M M ! �- �- �- �- � -- - N Nf p O m c o O m a a � m M Q O J a W p Q M YQ N M a 4'1 W h W rn ¢ Q m ¢' Y - N M y N W r W O) N Q d O ~0 m s N 0 G 0 0C? OC�) m N M N O h d N a N p 0 rn O N O 0 rn m O M1 O N � fro '. cm'� ! 0 � N d M m n m O rn O h m M M m h N r O N m m V M m N O N n n 0 h V 0 N Z O N m N m M m m rn .O N YJ m m O N V m MN d N F O O N m m V V m N m m m m N O rn V V N h VMV LL) m m m O N m V m iO m m M o m M M M m V m m a LU m m n m N M m m M dN m M m - V M uY � V ry M M M V a N N m J Z O N m m N N 01 N m m m N ON m N M N m N M V N v d � m � � � � cS M- .M- M- .M- - - - - m W d N d N 0 h Z '.O M NIMNNVWNWWO ... M M M1 aa m M m m m M O O N W '...0 N m m O N n rn m n m m O N rn O M n m M aa n 0 N N M M M M m M N V M V a N - - - - - - - - - - 0_ N - - - - - - - - - - - N r [O (�pp m M O N m M1 M1 O M1 O) m N h a s O N m m rn m M h a0 M m N m K r NNMMMNMMV V M M X N N N M M N M M C M M M M N .- .- .- - - - - � - MN U) y 0 M V N rn M rn m m m m M1 N m pm., d� V m V 0 h V V N rn rn r M o O N N N m m m �p MM0 0 M O N N r m ��pp O m n m n M m N i4 N J d N ^ ' N N N V CJ M ap M N N N ^ M M - - N M Ii h. � N 0 d -- - -- - 0 .T. Z"O N O N N N n m m r M m M m r O N O V M1 M m m lfi n N M O Ln M N N d rn N N Z = An W = yy} O �' m V N urni a N V Orn �O h f q it1 m Q Z a m M M .l-- - - - N -N rn Z m M "m - - M -- -- ..-- N N N M m .- m O 3 0 � a w tp M m rn m m r m m 01 tlJ N N m h w Ip m rn o o rn rn m m O n M M1 i_ O = af - N N M mom V m2 NN mNy m � � O mrn a Mm �i v> n Mmtfi N O d' h � .N- ^ ' ' � � N N N M t j y U m N' - - - - - - U„m„ O fn N ~ m N P .N- .- .- .- .- ^ ^ M N Lo O Om 4 Q � KY N Ma mmr mm � � � F a � v U O 0 W s N Nrn Atlh N � A� Tc+Y ra a0 O MNOO O � °M m N W W tp W fD s ," �.rpp- IL N 10 N omoW°rYnO °M N VM'Tn f W (° YS YJ l° 1tJ h W M1 n n N N N n W W N V M °M N O rn r f1 M C O N N cr O 0 M1 N Z °p ��� 1Om ^ W aomGou°Ji n:. uoi m ao N - IN N H U I Cp W M W W N O T W W W M N N W O y V O N y N N N N W W N n N O'� IN - ON N N a NM w X N V V V V M1 N N N W N P„N V m M y. h ta�J N N J O W N VNN h n � W ° ON GZ N •- rn' N � N N N a H Z mmM1 N `<v V M C' r rn W tp d' N G. °O N NW^W O N N m O 'Jm N - WI N - -- - W. N d N NN! M lYa NM: m LN H W NV YW] CN"NJ W N t O°W '(Ny M;Z: N r(D N:V - a s- W rn� 'W O h M1 O r N N � W N � w ���� m Q. N N NNO W t° Pr ° V m0� M �" NmmOaaY N p C' C'M'.07 M N Q' O NN,^N_t� N f6"J +- K p NNND M (p4��.Y. Ni x U N h t°Mb W r G �` N sf 1°N n CD )(b TKO N y rm:A W rn )C"1 Z ^ .T m < O -P^N m f G x C Y �' m m W....._ 7 m = m rn u�ve�.norrn rn om� oo °"+G rus)n roa ° 10 "+ m om.- o � ° O d'V' W tCi rn M N h tp m M1 Y M O V Cp W N •- V N N V CD Q Zr W �2�2 �2 M N�� W W ��� N r N r O Z' M M 2 H N W 3 r �8�v� Lm m W�` rnoo ;mM NN N'^^ - r } -- . - M1 T WYNJ Co M W Lam W C° C C 3 C c C C J CC D C ,J C C n oohrmo'� � ° ^ oon^ mc)� � � Odh oorrrno� � XOdn oon� rn o � � o�mrno 01.a o�» mG (9 9U' 1Is o�Mrno C9 t`pN N M M N Mc c X O d ^ c f ❑ O'.m W ❑ O °� n ❑ m J d o DO w W y j d d' N N M V t 0 W d N m v N M d ' m s N rn Nm N i0 � 1,W Y.M T(rn0 Tm mN M m Om O m O U O N rn O m N rn O m T m T m T m T m w m m w 00 O M N m o O h m N W o 0 O O � C? f-� � aD W Cp O m Cp p N O M O M 0 M O n 1(I O N W O N � a: W m ^ YON mm a: mmm mm mN a' m� M a' m' M L d m rn to 0 O N O m 0 ":N m O N m m M n p m O N Cp m O N h h d' I O M o O n M O m o h O m m o 0 M1 p N h o Z O N m n m N ''rn m O N p N N h N m O N N N m tp V m O N Z t0 h p Cp O Of M ^ m N O. U W 7 m W M1 m o M m rn m rn a° m m p p m .im M m N o rn "a OO N m M M M m O N o n y N O m O N M p Y) M rY' ,[ O CV p a 7' O N M m O 1� °p m O N Irn0 M 00 M M O N N V O CO a O O N M p M1p O i7 �py d N ^ V V M r Of p �. N � •- •- p p J J O N O N `�° pmj N p 0 O N N W N VO' O N N OOf N N cn N Z M p M m M of W d CV - �- p a N - �- p d N p' v ll. N p pj a z Z M N p m o M m m W O a m N < Wp o M M Ip m W O e W O F OCrnm rn � Wm ONmh mu� mp ONrnm o> m mm ON (nn mu> rn � ,,..... a. N •- •- p 0 a N - V H O N [m[pp OY V ° n O N N ti m m N O N MW M T p ° M1 O N CS INS mm a N M M N O N m a: `O M M N M m a: O m m N O N m Od N � � E p p `-' d ry •- •- •- p p ^ a. N �- a- O ,d: " d N r � p p: •- M m •- •- M h N O. rn N M Y) N Z S a..m m N N m OY N Z ='O N U O N W m (p (p x p`> m N N W rn R' M N N m M d' pY m H N m N N Z m d m m 10 m Z Z O O O � , O m M OY W N e N M rn m p m OY o H d M rn � m N o h m �Y m y m m o U O is m ao m m U O m W yy rn o U > O m m m m m U 0 0 m W e} rn o W a' W N .N- .- m p' W a' `m N N m OI p W � a: W N N s p W } ''.,x C N N en w a:CL IL OOO m10 omOJ_ O Q OJ_ m'C O M omOJ aLm O Cj O M OQ' m�r nrnoIt) dm° n '- m m m C J C_ C_ j 0 ¢ N N W N w 0 ¢ J O a aS mm omC9 C9 aS Inm om U' U' aS m f orn UO a.� � lnm orn OC9 m Nro •- •- m O mt- ip �- m ❑ H to .- .- m a m ¢ c a g m < c a W M WO O d Jm �O � ro O m wm p O mmD qa mh W Q � QmM1 W a m (/j Q mh m � a' m s N � m m Tm Tm T^ y,0 p O m h mtO m n mfD O M O n h N N 0 c'Y O M M N O mh V 'El'i*i M a N p rrpp <ai M m M m m O h o 0 A A m O O) O N a 0 0 IW N O N NW D h 0 N tWh f0 O N h � m O O m N N h yy� N V N m aN O a N m m m m Nm,I a N t0 m m m m a M N `- N m m '.<o V m m W h a N � o a N 0 m O N ey} m N N V Ol N O N'M O uN'1 b y h M O N O M cOD N (�O p:, 0 - O N N h N ry,.UQ (.„� '- y M h m h V m N o h m M N h m o h WW h V W M N h m Z O N m m OI m N M O N p) m h O M N M O N Ih m m m 0 'V' O N O m h O V 0 d N i0 N st m o M a N m m .V- m O m a N m SNO ''.P It t0 N � � m m P N U W m m N m m O a M m yy ss}} N m m o m m N m m o o W < d' N m VI o �1 O N m m Of m N O N O a I() (f1 N IfJ IfJ N m a' 1!] N m O N a• IA tl'1 m m N m - - �m '..- N N M N -� is N •- •- •- •- m a N (O (V - a N y µµ O N N N ':O N W h aOD M m �p O N a N m S ^ O a N J J O N a N •- •- �- �- m (� N a N � � � � m � N d Q a N If! d' M M N YJ N a N lfI V N M N m V M M'...'m m N N h a ^ V m a N Q � C V a N � � a V N " V H U O N h V V h A M O N M m N m O O m O N h y ,.h pp M O N M m N ml0 O m Q m h N N o O N ��pp O O 'Oo aa O N O t, m W N N M M m V O -. M O O O M M m o M O m O m N h o 0 0 0 M M m o 0 p O N_ (Wp M (p N N m O) O N M O 4> M m �- Lam"O _N m M m h M M D✓ O N M p N M m Ila pf M {I H N to M P a m M M N �- W Ul a W M M ^ N 1N M 10`a' pl M M N M Il h p) Z ^ _ N ' N a' x CO 7 - o O3- NNM m w O mom N W M > O Nmm � .- 'rsi } O m ($ m N r ,i m a' M N N N M *- (n a' N N N m M (+} W M a' `W M N " N r) r m K N N N t7 Q ZO ora sue (� - OU N - 2 zi W � m O W m N m M 0) -e O m h M fn m O ONi N N um'} t+M'f W O � x O N hW N M - O Oyu hN M m W O dm `h �`+ � � �'.. o W Oclis � nN cP ! M m m O .cmh (" � � "' 00 a a m a m a m x C J C G = C J C C x G J C C = C J G G m m (D o ¢ h m m m M .� .�a U` o ¢ m m m m 'm m U_ 'p ¢ ' O O N �- ^ m V' N N U� U� '�_ F m N N O 00 N O x N 'r jp N N N O O O p N N O M N `o o to m ¢ � a fn m ¢ c a !p m ¢ N d ova W w O m w m W m W O o w ¢ w Q tx/1 a¢, Imo N N a QN Q W O ~ a Q x Qm0 N m q 0 s � O U O T r 10 T a7 � T 61 tp OI [O j� n OI r 01 T V A N M1 � f0 tp (p (D M1 N M1 N O (? mN m ".a � o � a Nam d ryvv ,ay � � � m � a Noai N N (O D N W C N N IO D N pOj O O N O V O (O O N t0 N N N d p � ',,,,a Nam d rynm d Nva a Nm � co � y Now O N N Z 0 N D N N M O V O N W YOi N N N � 0 d N � d N M1 N d ry V V V V n1 N lD (O (O tD d ry O7 O � N U W co o m n N m m m 0 0 m o m o 7 D N p� D D N O m LO M1 LO M1 O N r N d N LL N m d ry V V V V LL N (D t0 N (O a ry Ol O N a 0 11'j 0 �f1 y 0 h 0 h 0 h v h W K N N C N N O O T N O M O N N [p J J 0 D N O N O O O N W N d N r r d N V V O V 0. N t0 YJ t0 i0 a N N O� O a H Z m O n 0 M N m 0 M y O y O 0..M n YJ n i0 0 M N N W D N. N Q N N D N N N c0 N D NN N V N V D N Ul r 0 (V N U O N � aD N o O NN0 Nan O N nO 10 D N m � Im V {Y W 00 cc N N 4l u'1 Y a ry M1 � U) 'O N LL'1 O a a D N N h N [0 OOf D N W N 0) N D N b (O O O J I� N m N Q N (D c0 N ID d' 0 0 0 O O a ry N Vl iq �n a ry M1 M1 M1 M1 p a N V 0 0 0 O m V N O D N N m O m a n n m D N m N m D N V7 Y m m m N N iK � � r a s CL m N N N N iT m N N N N Y m [Q p (n O v 0 O) h o m o 0 (D (A O)7 1 m m in m in V o m m U D mN mw D O r (nN m o O � N � N C7 ((OOr vv Q d g a O � ' mom mm 0 rain in n in m N �nrn inm m Nm cma a0 am � � O m v m a O d' n Z O 11 0. o o m a m m m m d in in cc to O w U M T w ¢ n n n n n iQ n m m m M < n N N N N < M m m m 6 r a a m z M m M M �o N m rn m m N h J rn rn D D w H O N N N N y) N N N N U ',U o N o m U ON �o m M m m U h h H U ur h en' Of m CY ¢ �',,4 tle Q � Q OQ Q C7 w O' w w W ~ w Q v M raiQ � m r¢iQ O � � co p Mom F m _m z O � m m a O — ro � m a O NU Oy Of 7 T U CD 0 Y w w w w CD '.w w W W C7 2 <2 2 0 x 0 O N UI O I.R el? 5 g ,—, g"&LbIQ III D G 0 0 �lP s zt il K21 s s xI IN M M M CIO W v CD 0 In In In eo z 0 m m rZ— m Y, R I Irl ll� �r..) r- rD IN IN N < m v LU -6 ItIn IN Z a. G, E S LU Q 0 00 ID ID to In W) N �a �2�S It) m 0 < < < < V c's 1 , 1z 14 19) (D D II m M U D z < � LQO -ffi ID M 0 M m p CID M In In In In m F dad a - 119 �Q IS`Q-0, R In b In mIn p q r, r., 1 7 7. CD D n n of S E Wl 71, ra s fA 0 a U 9 c-,i' 0 R 6' 9 9 < < In (Ii w "I N (N IN IN IN 10 IN IN IN N Io m In m m In ov_ a Ma < In m In < 0 U 0 0 rz, 0 1.0 0 cc, IN N a, m m In N < 2 ff z Qryry C? C? UO 1� 0 0 E N C, N N N 75 0 z a IN N IN IN ctI IN m IN m m 0 IN N cD IN w N " N I, co In In In < < < < < < M m m j W W W W d < < us � Mmmm HMmmm m7Fmmmm r- Mmmm < < O a, a, 6 N 6. N.0 m. m. m m Sri In It In B V C' '*� l I 0 w IN N N IN N N N - - - - -- m "I c iz- N IN N m C3 , 6 U) of M m 7 4- z x as IN -F, -jg IN N m (L 18� 0000 0000 z N In IN uj 00 00 IN N N 2 - w J- w I W J- U)- � - m m m m IN IN w r 0 1, 0 N 90 �2 c06 InIn z w N N IN IN F- z N N m v m N 0 w w aM M M m O N N N M 0 mmmm i- M a a V7 v F- in' 0 42 ca 7 S G m 04 0 .0 0 N 0 0 0 u w m m N 'L- V) —, " 0 IN z a , 00 0 T.. z m 0 O H n c n n aQ �R < 19 '4 S, �5 D m �n m .1 m �q 't a, 0 t, M 11 0 1!, < 0 off ff i5 7 -M C' i5 i i �,S' < '15 m �D o 0 w 0 z 0- N N IN 100 -7, 75 v a N 0 N N IN vl to 0 m < m.O.. .(¢D. ' m < < uj 1 Lj 7 MIAW wwww DWWWW < m as (om Qd m L L 0rn ¢ a IL a- CL, M s(L (L s N N O U O t C O U o O C N p N O rq O p U L U 0 N L c O N O E O O N E o� � o o E d QI U W W V Q N O W V E O O c c N Pl. m I o ID ei ¢ O 01 O L N o XQ YJ Y.. R W R t I r° m r r Q •s '+Y Tf kt 4 eJ N,eyi,r� q r+i c!i m n'i Q Q N IU Ill Y e:.a 'a IN C IJf �XC 'J' IN QD w' [YA 'cY W V �xr P.. N N N N N ❑ % ... ._ o ❑ % R +R IC) V zX > w } bd O p O0rn rn .. omom o u{ ar ur rn o r- Meal W ( D r,u 1, v.v.V M T t� r ,.g V In w. N � O K In v- Q %C t! W — Syr M Y .") rcd W - xx Y,.. L.- IO - xx rD Sh ['J P•.. N r.q u1) d In W rD (D O O 10 V m W N 10 V N C O 10 r Y1 r LO .0. W N O W Q In In M In O 10 O O Of W O M N N N N O O W m W Of O I(l h N N.C,•� L,.O, F n n n (O (O F M M M M M � d0 V V V V � V � ai"G in ram`' :.F m 2 _� S2 N 10, � w m �� _ _ tD J ¢ Q In w o M IN '� O � cv ii cV ") 'n '� 2S rc Fir F tai '� `m cD O d O O O o � O U a C, O O M N M N r`!l O M 00 N N m [O In z jp rNp O V W %� V l0 M V m M r� h N � IO IO W n IO (O W m M m a v W O W ' ! V (O W H M M m H as a v F- p O c c > 'c 7 y y C O U o 0 o a iD ca v vWr a r rv: v `.`ur = v v,r ni v m Q O CJ u .t 1r NadN nF a mw` N r`- m xr tyI { M N 13 0 M U O W V W O d ❑ ... .� .. V 0o E E % Q C oV IN N N Np Z ao O OrtD Y- Ccn- Lmi a } II N W fD 4r ja c0 m N m N N [O m t0 m f0 ja r N O O r m II II ID (D V M m V m a m r O O iN M V M In O O m m M m O N D [)) W !P W OY O Ln o ;te H rm W W to F mr� t"FMrA � a v vv a � , F- O (D la a a a a Appendix A.2 - CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Enrollment Projections T O O O O 1 d = M 0 0 0 0 0 n n V O O m m ' M, LL O � h O IM d O : ° 9N � m m ICI cv m j Q O F a c o N O O O 0 0 0 0 00 O O O O O 0 0 0 0 N m m M N O O O N N M w N... U 2 w C N O G O y N d • J d a) C �a o o m G 3 0o rornl LU N a C � O N O a C e y � b d b ° _ 0] • � m o � v rn r M o 0 0 � r r r M � r r r M O G N d m p N aQa .0 O. Y $ 2 Y'',.co Y x Y co m Y Y co m y' Y rn J d G b cs C d d ry c LL — lL O a a N O LL d 2UyjOor EEmdNm; QR Gac —0_ Nm d L � mlcN nW N d EQ mN .AaN' da' daO CDU000 NCt=o7 E . '!d m . a D rs a da a T a D aa M � m o d d To o i� F c c Q 0 m = E90 = , �m d d G m N 0 d w � U U W d Q n3 ti EtLi O ti C7 d m m � U z 2 0 Q O ° m m m p a m A Y Y d d h W N F� F m Q N M Q N M ry N M M N N N N N N M M M M M O N N M N N M M N N N N N N M M M M M O N N � OI 01 m W 00 r r r r O o O N M ry N N N N N N N N N M M M M � A N O w o„ r r rr�lr r r n o o o a o 0 0 0 o e e e e o O N N C 0 U N m d O � - � C - m � O N 7 W y � o a r O . ... ..... .. p] Q O NN OM MNm ` ` — NNMNN d `+ N[N MM � NOOON � NM � NM 0 a m in in ro .9 < o m iA M �n m N co rn rn o v o p� m r M N N N m l6 m V N M F a M O O O N N N V vl m Z > v N C Q > 10 n M f0 v M T � C6 06 10 N E N �p M y > A OD OO 6 ep O V p mad Cd ` J N C m - 9 a 3 ur } j C O O O N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i0 N N M V U C w — — — — — — — a p ,,.2 .0 en W W W N N o aN � ❑ � N M V �[1 (O r OJ O1 � � � � m M l9 ❑ � N M V N (O r m rn � � � �° a I �- N a M a N V n W n � M 0 N l0 a n n O m n Ol V � a N N a N a N a N N N a N CL C 0 p a p a C O �.M M m N M m rn N N fp M M r N Ol N M h M M � M.� Oi w N a N a O w a N W N = � N N N N n O n m n N N N N M N r �A M N N M M m n N a N d a > .O M M O N N M N a0 N aJ M O1 O E M O 01 (p d r N C m N o C a O :. aN - °' v IL > a IL O N co a i a' o m j 0 a) w o a) > > o' v N v, o m 9 O T J O w 1] . L T I ID a 1 O cEN evE a Cm ' ° pJt . C '� EC amcc o 7o o0 � t , °0mo eo Q U O ° t0 a) Z 0Q)zaT ` � mmm l0o a) ' > JMNd 0Jm N Z oo aZEaN 0. U z E W CI Y a U o v3i r N a N D N UJ O O— — — — — — — — — — O�O N N N a N d c O O V p 9 C 0 0 7 N r N r N m d) V O V r 0 0 > O O O O d N N M N M M I� N N r (p M M N N (D d N N m N m M F N N V7 M N N M M m � �O O � � w N a N a �o m oo m d r U m M m v aJ m 0 I� V N Ol fD N f0 V O co O U d N N M M N �O N iO N N N m M N r d N N M M N W — N N N m M V Q p O r r r r r r r r r r m r r r r M N 'm p O- - — — — — h � .-- � M � � � � 41',M ry d ry CL N d r � N w UJ M c in C � Q y dw IL 0 (DCL a ( Y ~ O GC7 Y ~ a0 a` � V W O d O L d O d O L EaM o C) prm aroma o a�iprm O d 0 L m N m . .00 T N d C { m N m L T a J 2 0 m L C O (p d J 0 m J] C O (O > d a 3 0 a c m d 3 o ° c a pmH � ev � o� ° Ea o ,,,,,,'..imp r c m (—' m ° Eo o C i m m — oa t an m m = o -0 ; � offmo ° od 3 � 0 ° o E ro o � � d n V y ma~ ri � 'dpE •�Q Cd a>OI Yc Cm iN � ZmQ a UN NC c LCm In oW N w ro Em m N mn>O � O O O O i z u0y L L O. d tm L C Appendix A.3 Student Generation Survey V 10 O O O O O O O O o O O O O O O G O 0 u O M O N op V'. m co � O O O � '. 0 0 O 0 0 O M O = O 0 0 0 0 O O 0 N 0 O O O O O O N O pCj '�O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O a N O_ O M E N M O N � N O O O O O O O O O O O W 7) M m A N Y In 0 D = 0 N -� 3� N N M O w � O � � M L o N N � c Q E d 0 0 O O O O N O O O' O w p V I� M O� O O 9 _ N Q w U U, V m O) (D O M m M N 00 m N ui `. U N N N O M 0(O OJ N O. O y y M M N O) U c 7 N IL _N LL o p _N C W E o ° w w = > a j 'o m J o �., aai (9 m o m m _`m m _`m af Z N U C D O N N N t0 l0 O O O N N C O Q Q f� U Y J J J J � � f7 (n H W MOm N O C F o �+ b r N r N O r r aD r r p [p 'R N p pCj T� qI W r r N N N N r r OD r r Ma m c 9 m m a E � N W M r co N V � E n N o v w m 0 N U L O L N U 'n 0 � a ON O O (D V r Mco (DM N r r N N Cl) LO r r O r r m 7 n Gf N o w G LO Q w U O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U C b N 7 U � O y V 1� W O N N M LLM7 V O M 00 (D 1M fA w r N r r Y1 C � jai 0 U Q C W _N O U N C E (J O O O ,p d Q d' O L LL am N U E _ O C D C W a a M T �p O In O R m _N U ) U ?� N N n d N d C N',,N UI N UI '� O c p ID > U U U !d N'',,. N111 U N — p N c l0 'C (0 l0 (0 N m f0 m m U N < Co Co 7 2'.2J JJd Q' fn } M M r� O N D O 0 0 F N O O = 0 0 0 0 C � N W M (h O r M N 7 a 0 0 0 O C U O O O'O a N E ((0 V M M N N t^O d o 0 0 0 W A N N V O M N (D H w O F N N = U y (D V .- N L O N N 77 r M U - E M U) 2 a m c v a w i E 3 a 4 D a 0000 o ao 01 Q o IT co (D m S o � u O TV N �.... o ,,.0 0 r N M L Q 7 yV � ...,'..N O O CO O aD _ M co N V m V N 0) N M M N CD D C � 7 a m Q C Q (D k U E Y ro E E J Z 1� p t C N w 0 -0 O a " = L C y'Dy 0_S C Q v �L C O C 3 Q E O Q d LL 0 = N U (0 c LL O. a F C a N N N �. O C -O 7 C C ¢ —_ W Y C N 3 ❑ JJF Nd � CnF x FEDERAL, WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Each Scholar: A voice. A dream. A BRIGHT future, a ' yHIGH r / (�p CAPITAL FACILITIES' PLAN 2018 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Adopted July 25, 2017 BOARD OF EDUCATION Geoffery McAnalloy Claire Wilson Liz Drake Carol Gregory Hiroshi Eto SUPERINTENDENT Dr. Tammy Campbell Prepared by: Sally D. McLean, Chief Finance & Operations Officer Tanya Nascimento, Student& Demographic Forecaster FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 2-3 SECTION 1 THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Introduction 4 Inventory of Educational Facilities 5 Inventory of Non-Instructional Facilities 6 Needs Forecast - Existing Facilities 7 Needs Forecast -New Facilities 8 Six Year Finance Plan 9 SECTION 2 MAPS OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES Introduction 10 Map - Elementary Boundaries 1 I Map - Middle School Boundaries 12 Map - High School Boundaries 13 SECTION 3 SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION Introduction 14 Building Capacities 15-17 Portable Locations 18-19 Student Forecast 20-22 Capacity Summaries 23-27 King County Impact Fee Calculations 28-30 SECTION 4 SUMMARY OF CHANGES FROM THE 2017 PLAN 31-33 1.. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN INTRODUCTION In response to the requirements of the State of Washington Growth Management Act (SHB)2929 (1990) and ESHB 1025 (1991)), and under the School Impact Fee Ordinances of King County Code 21 A, City of Federal Way Ordinance No. 95-249 effective December 21, 1995 as amended, City of Kent Ordinance No.3260 effective March 1996, and the City of Auburn Ordinance No. 5078 effective 1998, Federal Way Public Schools has updated its 2018 Capital Facilities Plan as of May 2017. This Plan is scheduled for adoption by King County,the City of Kent, City of Federal Way and the City of Auburn and is incorporated in the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction by reference. This plan is also included in the Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. To date, the City of Des Moines has not adopted a school impact fee ordinance. The City of Des Moines collects school impact fees as part of the SEPA process. The Growth Management Act requires the County to designate Urban Growth areas within which urban growth can be encouraged. The Growth Management Planning Council adopted and recommended to the King County Council four Urban Growth Area Line Maps with designations for urban centers. A designation was made within the Federal Way planning area, which encompasses Federal Way Public Schools boundaries. King County will encourage and actively support the development of Urban Centers to meet the region's need for housing,jobs, services, culture, and recreation. This Plan's estimated population growth is prepared with this underlying assumption. This Capital Facilities Plan will be used as documentation for any jurisdiction, which requires its use to meet the needs of the Growth Management Act. This plan is not intended to be the sole planning tool for all of the District needs. The District may prepare interim plans consistent with Board policies or management need. Construction to replace Federal Way High School and to increase capacity by approximately 200 students has been in progress since 2014. We are currently nearing the completion of this $106 million project. The District began Phase I in Summer 2014, The newly constructed building, including the majority of the classrooms (Phase 1I), was ready for use beginning in the 2016-17 school year. The existing cafeteria, gymnasium, and kitchen will continue to be in use during construction. Phase III, demolition of the cafeteria, gymnasium, and kitchen, and construction of athletic fields, will begin this summer and is expected to be completed by Winter 2018. The District continues to monitor factors that may have an impact on enrollment and capacity at our schools. In accordance with the McCleary decision, the State continues to phase in funding based on a reduction of K-3 class size to 17 and 4-12 class size to 25. Initiative Measure No. 1351 would further reduce these class sizes in schools where more than 50% of students were eligible for free and reduced-price meals in the prior year. Under this measure, class sizes in those schools would be reduced to 15 in grades K-3, 22 in grade 4, and 23 in grades 5-12. The additional class size reductions required by Initiative 1351 would increase our classroom need from 60 to 120 at our Elementary & K-8 schools and add a need for an additional 26 classrooms at our Secondary schools. 2 _FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN During the 2016-17 school year the District formed a Facilities Planning Committee consisting of District staff, parents, and community members. The Committee was tasked with developing a recommendation to the Superintendent regarding Phase 2 of the District's plan for school construction, remodeling, and/or modernization for voter consideration in November 2017. Through the committee's work a determination was made to recommend the rebuilding of Thomas Jefferson High School, Illahee Middle School, Totem Middle School, Lake Grove Elementary, Mirror Lake Elementary, Olympic View Elementary, Star Lake Elementary, and Wildwood Elementary. In addition to the school projects, the committee is also recommending the modernization of Memorial Stadium, which currently supports athletic activities for all schools. The rebuild of the aforementioned schools will create additional capacity for 960 students at the elementaries and 200 students at the high school. The expanded capacity supplants the need for additional elementary schools. We will also continue to study school boundaries as new housing and fluctuating populations impact specific schools. Some shifts in boundaries may be required in the coming years. At this time with more than 1,000 unhoused elementary students, boundary adjustments cannot resolve the need for additional capacity. The maps included in this Plan reflect the boundaries for the 2017-18 school year. 3 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 1 - THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN The State Growth Management Act requires that several pieces of information be gathered to determine the facilities available and needed to meet the needs of a growing community. This section provides information about current facilities, existing facility needs, and expected future facility requirements for Federal Way Public Schools. A Financial Plan that shows expected funding for any new construction, portables and modernization listed follows this. 4 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN INVENTORY OF EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS(K-5) Adelaide 1635 SW 304" St Federal Way 98023 Brigadoon 3601 SW 336"St Federal Way 98023 Camelot 4041 S 298"St Auburn 98001 Enterprise 35101 5" Ave SW Federal Way 98023 Green Gables 32607 47'"Ave SW Federal Way 98023 Lake Dolloff 4200 S 308"St Auburn 98001 Lake Grove 303 SW 308'" St Federal Way 98023 Lakeland 35827 32"d Ave S Auburn 98001 Mark Twain 2450 S Star Lake Rd Federal Way 98003 Meredith Hill 5830 S 300" St Auburn 98001 Mirror Lake 625 S 314" St Federal Way 98003 Nautilus (K-8) 1000 S 289" St Federal Way 98003 Olympic View 2626 SW 327" St Federal Way 98023 Panther Lake 34424 1"Ave S Federal Way 98003 Rainier View 3015 S 368" St Federal Way 98003 Sherwood Forest 34600 12t°Ave SW Federal Way 98023 Silver Lake 1310 SW 325" PI Federal Way 98023 Star Lake 4014 S 270" St Kent 98032 Sunnycrest 24629 42"d Ave S Kent 98032 Twin Lakes 4400 SW 320" St Federal Way 98023 Valhalla 27847 42"d Ave S Auburn 98001 Wildwood 2405 S 300" St Federal Way 98003 Woodmont(K-8) 26454 16" Ave S Des Moines 98198 MIDDLE SCHOOLS(6-8) Federal Way Public Academy(6-10) 34620 9"Ave S Federal Way 98003 Illahee 36001 1"Ave S Federal Way 98003 Kilo 4400 S 308t' St Auburn 98001 Lakma 1415 SW 314" St Federal Way 98023 Sacajawea 1101 S Dash Point Rd Federal Way 98003 Sequoyah 3450 S 360'" ST Auburn 98001 Totem 26630 40'Ave S Kent 98032 TAFA @ Saghalie(6-12) 33914 19"Ave SW Federal Way 98023 HIGH SCHOOLS (9-12) Decatur 2800 SW 320"St Federal Way 98023 Federal Way 30611 16' Ave S Federal Way 98003 Thomas Jefferson 4248 S 288` St Auburn 98001 Todd Beamer 35999 16" Ave S Federal Way 98003 Career Academy at Truman 31455 28" Ave S Federal Way 98003 ADDITIONAL SCHOOLS Internet Academy (K-12) 31455 28'Ave S Federal Way 98003 Employment Transition Program (12+) 33250 21"Ave SW Federal Way 98023 Federal Way Open Doors 31455 28°Ave S Federal Way 98003 5 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CURRENT INVENTORY NON-INSTRUCTIONAL FACILITIES Developed Property Central Kitchen 1214 S 332°d Federal Way 98003 Federal Way Memorial Field 1300 S 308t' St Federal Way 98003 Educational Services Center 33330 81"Ave S Federal Way 98003 Support Services Center 1211 S 332"d St Federal Way 98003 Leased Property Early Learning Center at Uptown 1066 S 320" St Federal Way 98003 Square Undeveloped Property Site Location 75 SW 360th Street& 3rd Avenue SW—9.2 Acres 65 S 351st Street& 52nd Avenue S—8.8 Acres 60 E of IOth Avenue SW - SW 334th & SW 3351" Streets - 10.04 Acres 73 N of SW 320"'and east of 45'" PL SW —23.45 Acres 71 S 344th Street& 46th Avenue S - 17.47 Acres 82 1s` Way S and S 342nd St—Minimal acreage 96 S 308"' St and 14`"Ave S— .36 Acres Notes: Not all undeveloped properties are large enough to meet school construction requirements. Properties may be traded or sold depending on what locations are needed to house students in the District. 6 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN NEEDS FORECAST - EXISTING FACILITIES PHASE EXISTING FACILITY FUTURE NEEDS ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF FUNDS On- Purchase and Relocate Interim Capacity Anticipated source of funds is going Portables Impact Fees. II Thomas Jefferson High Replace Existing Building, Capital bond request School Increase Capacity 11 Illahee Middle School Replace Existing Building Capital bond request 11 Totem Middle School Replace Existing Building Capital bond request II Lake Grove Elementary Replace Existing Building, Capital bond request Increase Ca acit II Mirror Lake Elementary Replace Existing Building, Capital bond request Increase Capacity ]I Olympic View K-8 School Replace Existing Building, Capital bond request Increase Capacitv II Star Lake Elementary Replace Existing Building, Capital bond request Increase Capacitv [1 Wildwood Elementary Replace Existing Building, [Capital bond request Increase Capacity 1[ MemorialStadium Re lace Existin Facilit ital band request III Decatur High School Replace Existing Building, TBD Increase Ca acit III Kilo Middle School -Replace Existing Buildinf, TBD III Sacajawea Middle School Replace Existing Building TBD III Adelaide Elementary Replace Existing Building, TBD Increase Capacitv III Brigadoon Elementary Replace Existing Building, TBD Increase Capacity III Camelot Elementary Replace Existing Building, TBD Increase Capacity III Lake Dolloff Elementary Replace Existing Building, TBD Increase Capacity III Mark Twain Elementary Replace Existing Building, TBD Increase Capacity III Nautilus K-8 School Replace Existing Building, TBD Increase Capacitv III Twin Lakes Elementary Replace Existing Building, TBD Increase Capacity tl l Woodmont K-8 School Replace Existing Building, TBD Increase Capacity As part of the multi-phase plan, the District intends to increase capacity for elementary and high school students with expansion at the Thomas Jefferson, Lake Grove, Mirror Lake, Olympic View, Star Lake, and Wildwood sites. Increased capacity at the five elementary schools listed and additional elementary schools in later phases, supplant the need for construction of a twenty-fourth elementary school. Only projects in Phase II with plans to increase capacity are included in the impact fee calculation for this plan. 7 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN NEEDS FORECAST -ADDITIONAL FACILITIES NEW FACILITY LOCATION _j ANTICIPATED SOLRCE OF FIINDS No current plans for additional facilities. 8 Obbep. p e C. OG eeep. a o, c e.. qe L OOO ppOc NI' ONI a fA a WY ry M m C w C' Q QCCC,L N � O ONC W t� t3 t� 5 n. ^ ry a O O ii V '{'I Vi N '� G ✓ A .Fy VJ1 •� a N O O. 8�. O Yi ,e/CI � � Y Y JY' o 8988 71 a N Vgg3 V3 qM FR N U � � v O C Q 6 N a > a m v � 5 4 � zFF FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 2 - MAPS OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES Federal Way Public Schools has twenty-one elementary schools (grades K-5), two schools with a K-8 grade configuration, six middle school schools (grades 6-8), four high schools (grades 9-12)and two small secondary schools. The Federal Way Public Academy serves students in grades 6-10. The programs at Career Academy at Truman High School serves students in grades 9-12. In addition to these programs, TAFA @ Saghalie serves students in grades 6-12 who reside within the service area. The following maps show the service area boundaries for each school, by school type. (Career Academy at Truman High School and Federal Way Public Academy serve students from throughout the District). The identified boundaries are reviewed annually. Any change in grade configuration or adoption of programs that affect school populations may necessitate a change in school service areas. The Growth Management Act requires that ajurisdiction evaluate if the public facility infrastructure is in place to handle new housing developments. In the case of most public facilities, new development has its major impact on the facilities immediately adjacent to that development. School Districts are different. If the District does not have permanent facilities available, interim measures must be taken until new facilities can be built or until boundaries can be adjusted to match the population changes to the surrounding facilities. Adjusting boundaries requires careful consideration by the District and is not taken lightly. It is recognized that there is a potential impact on students who are required to change schools. Boundary adjustments impact the whole district, not just one school. It is important to realize that a single housing development does not require the construction of a complete school facility. School districts are required to project growth throughout the district and build or adjust boundaries based on growth throughout the district, notjust around a single development. 10 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS MIDDLE SCHOOLS 1 ADEIAIDE ELEMENTARY 36 FWPUHIICACADEMY 2 )RIGADOON ELEMENTARY 3U ILIAHEE MIDDLESCHOUL 3 CAMELOT ELEMENTARY 4 ENTERPRISE ELEMENTARY it KILO MIDDLE SCHOOL ". S 6REEN GABLES ELEMENTARY 32 LAKOTA MIDDLE SCHOOL 91 6 LAKE DOLLOFF ELCMENTARY 33 SACAIAWEA MIDDLE SCHOOL 7 LAKE GROVE ELEMENTARY 37 SEQUOYAH MIDDLE SCHOOL R LAKELAND ELEMENTARY 35 TOTEM MIDDLE SCHOOL 7 9 MARKTWAIN ELEMENTARY 38 TAT @SAGHALIE 10 MEREDITH HILL ELEMENTARY 11 MIRROR LAKE ELEMENTARY ry ' 1 COLS w 12 NAUTILUS DECATURSKe SCHOOL � :a qb DCCATUR IIIGII + 4 13 OLYMPIPANTHER VIEW ELEMENTARY 41 FEDERAL WAY HIGH 14 RAINIER VIEW ELEMENTARY 421 THOMAS IEFFER50N HIGH 16 RAINIER VIEW REST LCME 16 6HERW000 FOREST ELCMENTARY q5 TUUU BEAMED HIGH 17 SILVER LAKE ELEMENTARY 490 OlRCCR ACADEMY @ TRUMAN 51 ETP/NORMAN CENTER SR 4AR LAKE ELEMENTARY i l9 SUNNVCRC6T CLCM CNTARY 20 TWIM LAKES ELEMENTARY ADMINISTRATIVE SITES 21 VALHALLA ELEMENTARY 1// 22 WILDWOOD ELEMENTARY lti LW 'G 23 WOODMONT K-8SCHOOL I II 5 �IVI a *+ F T '• I '.. BI � ". S I I �S_i•. ENDS PROPERTY "II a I Ci.L I t Lse } I r " vP tll r I L le Iw � E ..e ,✓... .., YI a � . .fie ELEMENTARY , BOUNDARIES Lad,- q Y m,16,3 0.6 0,9 1,2 ®hllles D.te: 7.1A7 IZ FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS ELEMENTARY SCI I CC LS 101,. MIDDLE SCHOOLS 1 ADELAIDE ELEMENTARY 36 FWPUBLICACADEMY Z BRIGADCON ELEMENTARY 30 ILLAHEE MIDDLE SCHOOL J CAMLLOT ELEMENTARY 31 KILO MIDDLE SCHOOL 4 ENTERPRISE ELEMENTARY 5 GREEN GABLES ELEMENTARY 32 LAKOTA MIDDLE SCHOOL 6 LAKE DOLLOFF ELEMENTARY 33 SACAIAWEA MIDDLE SCHOOL 37 SEOUOYAH MIDDLE SCHOOL •� 7 LAKE GROVE CLCM[NTARY IL 9 LAKELAND ELEMENTARY 35 TOTEM MIDDLESCHOOL 9 M ARK T WAIN E LE M E NTARY 38 TA A SAGHALIE r '" 10 MEREDITH HILL ELEMENTARY " {d' u 11 MIRROR LAKE ELEMENTARY IIIGII SCHOOLS i 12 NAUTILUS KA SCHOOL ICE s 13 OLYMPIC VIEW ELEMENTARY 40 DECATUR HIGH „ ^' 6 RANTER 41 FEDERAL WAY IIIGII LAKE ELEMENTARY 4 15 C �xd 15 RAINIER VIEW CLCM CNTARY 421 T E SON IIIGII 4S TODD PEANUT 11I611 16 SHERWOOD FOREST ELEMENTARY { 17 SILVER LAKE ELEMENTARY 490 CARCER ACADEMY TRUMAN M1u p W'Y` 18 STAR LAKE ELEMENTARY 51 ETP/NORMAN CENTER 19 SUNNYCREST ELEMENTARY fi 20 TWIN LAKES ELEMENTARY FMI ADMINISTRATIVE SITES Xf ,� ^ `P r .Ik 1•, 21 VALHALLA ELEMENTARY L X Xr YI 1 ^I 22 WILDWOOD ELEMENTARY d L Il ( p} q r• " N ZJ WOVDMUNT NR SCHOOL FVVPS PROPERTY jk{D i II P tl Amy { Rprytl' t I 7.1 I t . . a MIDDLE SCHOOL „ X A BOUI'111 ►RIES .ur J,i% ° P` ; yYr /rymMnm ^ uAll, 00.I0.3 0,6 0.9 1,2 �NIIes Da[e 71_IF 12 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS ® CLIME NTARY SCI I OOLS MIDDLE SCHOOLS 1 ADEL A I D E ELEMENTARY 36 FW PUBLIC ACADEMY (S`"R 2 DRIGADOON ELEMENTARY 30 ILVIHEE MIDDLE SCHOOL d 3 CAMELOT ELEMENTARY ;IA 4 ENTCRPRISC CLEMENTARY 31 KILO MIDDLE SCHOOL 1f7 5 GREEN GABLES ELEMENTARY 32 IAKOTA MIDDLE SCHOOL 6 LAKE UOLLOFF ELEMENTARY 33 SAO4IAWEA MIDDLE SCHOOL y �, y 7 LAKE GROVE ELEMENTARY 37 SEQUOYAH MIDDLE SCHOOL of 4 R LAKELAND ELEMENTARY 35 TOTEM MIDDLE SCHOOL 9 9 MARK TWAIN ELEMENTARY 38 TAF@SAGHALIE rIr 10 MERCDIEII HILL ELEMENTARY 11 MIRROR LAKE ELEMENTARY L pa i 12 NAUTILUS K R SCHOOL i y HIGH SCHOOLS 4D DECATUR HIGH } 13 OLYMPIC VIEW ELEMENTARYi l` { j 30 PANTHER LAKE ELEMENTARY 41 FEDERAL WAY HIGH ! { d 421 THOMAS IEFFERSON HIGH pax .L 1R RAINIER VIEW ELEMENTARY d.A 65 TODD BLAMER IIIGII 17 SHERWOOD FOREST ELEMENTARYJ 490 CAREER ACADEMY[N TRUMAN I { Y 17 STARLAKEILVER E ELEMENTARY / c r 51 ETP/NORMAN CENTDi 1R S7ARLAKEELEMENTAk1' 19 SUNNYCRESF ELEMENTARY 4 1 20 TWIN LAKES ELEMENTARY ADMINISTRATIVE SITES r� ¢ I L /kf 21 VAL14ALM ELEMENTARY r p WL ILIlr 2' WILDWOOD EL EMENTARY y d fz i ¢ B 19r` Ll L i k 1 � 23 WOODMONTK-SSCHOOL FWPS PROPERTY ✓+" „ a y alp fl qr� .#.V le Nlu t t I f " 1 M v ( l/ri t I<ef juI 9 t � { IIYii L �v. � ff 8 p J9 WDA fl p YI 0¢ k1 I K I p r J ry F I HIGH SCHOOL I +!p v -• r! i BOUNDARIES p` " c 1 � r 03.1113 0.6 0.9 1.2 �MIIes Date:9.2.16 13 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 3 - SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION Building Capacities - The Education Program Portable Locations Student Forecast—2018 through 2024 Capacity Summaries King County Impact Fees - Single and Multi-Family Units 14 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN BUildin&Capacities This Capital Facilities Plan establishes the District's "standard of service" in order to ascertain the District's current and future capacity. The Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, but these guidelines do not take into consideration the education program needs. In general, the District's current target class size provides that the average class size for a standard classroom for grades K through 3 should be 17 students to comply with McCleary. In grades 4-5 the target is 25 students. For grades 6 to 12 the target class size is 26 students. Classrooms for students with Individualized Education Program(Special Education)needs are calculated at 12 seats per classroom. Historically, the District has used the OSPI square footage calculation as a baseline for capacity calculation and made adjustments for specific program needs. The District will continue to use this calculation for determining capacity at our middle and high schools. However, with the implementation of McCleary which requires a significant reduction in K-3 class sizes, elementary capacity, in this Plan, will be calculated based on the number of classroom spaces, the number of students assigned to each classroom and the extent of support facilities available for students, staff, parents, and the community. Class Size FWPS Historical HB2661/SHB2776 Square Footage Guidelines "Standard of Service" Enacted Law Guideline Kindergarten 20 17 25-28 _.. .... _.......- _.---- — Grades 1-2 20 17 25-28 Grade 3 25 17 28 Grades 4-5 25 25 28 For the purposes of determining student capacity at individual schools, the following list clarifies adjustments to classroom spaces and the OSPI calculation. Special Education Resource Rooms: Each middle school requires the use of a standard classroom(s) for special education students requiring instruction to address specific disabilities. English as a Second Language Programs: Each middle school and high school requires the use of a standard classroom for students learning English as a second language. Middle School Computer Labs: Each middle school has computer tabs, except Totem Middle School. Wireless access has been installed at all secondary schools. If additional classroom space is needed, these computer labs may be converted to mobile carts. 15 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN High School Career Development and Learning Center(Resource) Room: Each high school provides special education resource room and career development classrooms for students requiring instruction to address specific disabilities. PreschooFECEAP/Headstart: Our district currently offers preschool programs for both special needs & typically developing students at 9 elementary schools. We also have the ECEAP and Headstart program at 6 schools (4 elementary & 3 high schools). These programs decrease capacity at those sites. The District has recently leased space to expand or possibly relocate existing preschool programs. Alternative Learning Experience: Federal Way offers students the opportunity to participate in an Alternative Learning Experience through our Internet Academy. These students have never been included in the capacity calculation of unhoused students. 16 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN ELEMENTARY BUILDING MB)DLESCHOOLBUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY PROGRAM CAPACITY School Name Headcount SchoolNanx Headcount FTE Adelaide 353 Illahee 855 864 B6zadoon 299 Kilo 779 787 . .................... ....... Camelot 277 Lakota 786 794 Enterprise 345 Sacaiawea 694 701 Green Cables 401 Sequoyah 585 591 Lake Dolloff 400 Totem 795 803 Lake Grove 353 TAFA 7a Saghalie 598 604 Lakeland 371 Federal Way Public Academy 11 185 MarkTwain 430 TOTAL 5,275 5,329 Meredith Hill 375 Mirror Lake 262 *bGddle School Averaee 727 735 Nautilus(K-8) _ 466 Olympic View .........353 HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING Panther Lake 347 PROGRAMCAPACITY Rainier View 405 Sherwood Forest 390 SchoolName Headcount FTE SilverLake 400 Decatur 1243 1.329 Star Lake 337 FederalWa 1684 1,801 Sunnycrest 405 Thomas Jefferson 1224 1309 Twin Lakes 341 Todd Beamer 1085 1,160 Valhalla 406 TAFA @ Saghalie 155 166 Wildwood 372 Career Academy at Truman 159 170 Woodmont(K-8) 357 Federal Way Public Academy 116 124 TOTAL 8,445 Employment Transition Program 48 51 TOTAL 5,714 1 6,111 Elementary Average 367 *High School Average 1 309 1,400 Notes; * Federal Way Public Academy,Career Academy at Truman high School,Employment Transition Program and TAFA @ Saghalie for the high school school grade span (9-12)are non-boundary schools. These schools are not used in the calculated averages. 17 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Portable Locations The Washington State Constitution requires the State to provide each student a basic education. It is not an efficient use of District resources to build a school with a capacity for 500 students due to lack of space for 25 students when enrollment fluctuates throughout the year and from year to year. Portables are used as interim measures to house students when increasing population impacts a school attendance area. Portables may also be required to house students when new or changing programs require additional capacity. They also provide housing for students until permanent facilities can be financed and constructed. When permanent facilities become available,the portable(s) is either used for other purposes such as storage or child care programs, or moved to another school for an interim classroom. Some portables may not be lit to move due to age or physical condition. In these cases, the District may choose to buy new portables and surplus these unfit portables. The following page provides a list of the location of the portable facilities, used for educational facilities by Federal Way Public Schools. 18 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL, FACILITIES PLAN PORTABLE LOCATIONS PORTABLES LOCATED PORTABLES LOCATED AT ELEMEYTARY SCHOOLS AT HIGH SCHOOLS NON VUN INS IRII(.IIONA1. INS FRICTIONAL' INS I RUC TIONAI. INx F IIII('o"11I. rwwnnnrviuuuuuuuuuum Adelaide 1 2 Decatur 8 ] Brigadoon 1 Federal Way Camelot 1 Thomas JelTerson 10 Enterprise 2 1 Todd Bcamer 8 Green ('cables 1 'TOTAL 26 1 Lake Dolloff 1 l lake Grove 2 Lakeland Mark Twain 3 Meredith I[ill l 2 PORTABLES LOCATED Mirror I ake 6 4 AT SUPPORT FACILITIES Nautilus 1 2 Olympic View 1 1 MOT Panther lake 3 1 1DC............................. 9 Rainier View 4 1 Formcr TAFA 20 Sherwood Forest 3 1 TOTAL 29 Silver Lake 1 3 Star I akc 3 1 Sunnycrest. 6 DISTRICT PORTABLES IN USE FOR ECEAP Twin Lakes 1 2 AND/OR HEADSTART '..Valhalla 4 Sherwood Forest 1 W ildwood 4 ...................................... ''.....W oodmont 3 Total ...........1........ '.TOTAL 49 26 PORTABLESLOCATED AT MIDDLE S CHOOLS VON 1'IONA1. INS'1'R11(.110NA1. Mabee 3 Kilo 7 1akota Sacaiawea 3 Seauovah 2 Totem TAFA A SaKhahe 4 TOTAL 5 14 *Non-instructional portables at lake Dolloff, Mirror Lake,and Nautilus will be in use as Instructional portables in the 2017-18 school year. 19 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Student Forecast Student enrollment projections are a basic component of budget development. Enrollment projections influence many of the financial estimates that go into budget preparation. The majority of staffing requirements are derived directly from the forecasted number of students. Allocations for instructional supplies and materials are also made on the basis of projected enrollment. Other expenditures and certain revenue projections are directly related to enrollment projections. Enrollment projections are completed annually in the Business Services Department. Projections must be detailed at various levels, district total, school-building totals, grade level and program level to include vocational and special education students. The basis of projections has been cohort survival analysis. Cohort survival is the analysis of a group that has a common statistical value (grade level) as it progresses through time. In a stable population the cohort would be 1.00 for all grades. This analysis uses historical information to develop averages and project the averages forward. This method does not trace individual students; it is concerned with aggregate numbers in each grade level. The district has used this method with varying years of history and weighted factors to study several projections. Because transfers in and out of the school system are common, student migration is factored into the analysis as it increases or decreases survival rates. Entry grades (kindergarten) are a unique problem in cohort analysis. The district collects information on birth rates within the district's census tracts, and treats these statistics as a cohort for kindergarten enrollment in the appropriate years. The Federal Way School District is using various statistical methods for projecting student enrollments. The resultant forecasted enrollments are evaluated below. The first method is a statistical cohort analysis that produces ten distinct forecasts. These are forecast of enrollment for one year. The projections vary depending on the number of years of historical information and how they are weighted. A second method is a projection using an enrollment projection software package that allows the user to project independently at school or grade level and to aggregate these projections for the district level. The Enrollment Master TM software provides statistical methods including trend line, standard grade progression (cohort) and combinations of these methods. This software produces a five-year projection of school enrollment. In December 2012, the District contracted a demographer to develop projections for the Federal Way School District. The report was complete in March 2013. The model used to forecast next year's enrollment uses cohort survival rates to measure grade to grade growth, assumes market share losses to private schools (consistent with county-wide average), assumes growth from new housing or losses due to net losses from migration. This forecast was provided as a range of three projections. The long-range forecast provided with this report used a model with cohort survival rates and growth rates based on projected changes in the 5-19 age group for King County. Most of the methods used for long range enrollment reporting assume that enrollment is a constant percent of 20 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN something else (e.g. population) or that enrollment will mirror some projected trend for the school-age population over time. The report included 5 different calculations to provide a range of possible projections for the District to the year 2023. This model produces a projection that is between 23,000 and 24,000 when applied to the low, medium and high range modes. This provides a reasonable range for long-range planning and is consistent with estimates from various models. An update to the District projections was provided in December 2016. Long-range projections that establish the need for facilities are a modification of the cohort survival method. The cohort method of analysis becomes less reliable the farther out the projections are made. The Federal Way School District long-range projections are studied annually. The study includes information from the jurisdictional demographers as they project future housing and population in the region. The long-range projections used by Federal Way Public Schools reflect a similar age trend in student populations as the projections published by the Office of Financial Management for the State of Washington. Near term projections assume some growth from new housing, which is offset by current local economic conditions. The District tracks new development from five permitting jurisdictions. Long range planning assumes a student yield from proposed new housing consistent with historical growth patterns. Growth Management requires jurisdictions to plan for a minimum of twenty years. The Federal Way School District is a partner in this planning with the various jurisdictions comprising the school district geography. These projections create a vision of the school district community in the future. 21 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Full Time Equivalent Enrollment History and Projections Simplified F'Fh:(K Headcount=.5 F"FE;Middle School FTF .99 Headcount;High School F FE'=.935Headcount) Total K-12 Percent Calendar Yr School Year Elementary Middle School high School FIN, Change 2012 2011-12 8,800 5,134 6,448 20,382 2013 2012-13 8,914 4,963 6,367 20,244 -0.7% 2014 2013-14 9,230 4,801 6.354 20,384 0.7% 2015 2014-15 9,177 4,884 6,402 20,462 0.4% 2016 2015-16 9,397 5.047 6,273 20,717 1.2% 2017 2016-17 9,589 4,986 6,063 20,638 -0.4% 2018 132017 IS 9,748 5,105 6,063 20.916 1.3% 2019 P2018-19 9,621 5,166 6,178 20,965 0.2% 2020 P2019-20 9,561 5,422 6,149 21,132 0.8% 2021 P2020-21 9,615 5,496 6,209 21,320 0.9% 2022 P2021-22 9,725 5,421 6.359 21,505 0.9% 2023 P2022-23 9,806 5,294 6,548 21,648 0.7% 2024 P2023-24 9,880 5,270 6,689 21.839 0.9'% Elementary K-5 Middle School 6-8 High School 9-12 23,000 Enrollment History and Six Year Forecast 22,000 21,000 20,000 19,000 18,000 17,000 16,000 15,000 RHl', ao �o ao �0 20 �o A ? 11 .11 lipli it PP 10 -.0 r �W ; �iF` ��+ a�i� > > > > > > C? School Year nFM 22 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Capacity Summaries All Grades, Elementary, Middle School, and High Schools The Capacity Summaries combine Building Capacity information, Portable Capacity information and the Student Forecast information. The result demonstrates the requirements for new or remodeled facilities and why there is a need for the District to use temporary facilities or interim measures. The District has recently adjusted its capacity calculation method for Elementary schools to better show capacity needed to comply with the K-3 Class Size Reduction. This adjustment is also shown in the portable capacity calculation. In order to allow for flexibility in portable usage the District will use an average class size calculation of 21 for each Elementary portable and an average class size of 25 for each Middle and High School portable. The information is organized in spreadsheet format, with a page summarizing the entire District, and then evaluating capacity vs. number of students at elementary, middle school, and high school levels individually. The notes at the bottom of each spreadsheet provide information about what facilities are in place each year. 23 FEDERAL, WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARY-ALL GRADES Budget -- Projected-- Calendar Year 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 CAPACITY School Year 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 BUILDING PROGRAM HEADCOUNT CAPACITY 197451 19,451 19,451 19A51 20,091 20,251 20,251 FTE CAPACITY 19,822 19,822 >19,822 19,822 19,822 19,822 1%822 Add Capacity 640 160 AdlustedProRramIleadcount Cap acity 19,451 19,451 19,451 20,091 20,251 20,251 20,251 Ad'ustedPt0 ramFTE Capacity 19,822 19,822 '19,822 20462 19,982 19,822'� ENROLLMENT BasicFTEFnrollment 20,916 20,965 2 1,132 21,320 21,505 21,648 21,839 Internet Academy Fhrollment(AAFTE) (11:;) (30.5) (315} (315) (305) (305) (315} Basic FTE Enrollment without Internet Academy 20.601 ' 20,650 2Q,817 21,005 21,190 21,333. 21,524 S URPLUS OR(UNHOUS ED) PROGRAM FTE CAPACITY (779)' (828) (995) (543) (1,208) (1,511 (1,7( RELOCATABLECAPACITY Current Portable Capacity 2,129 21171 2,171 2.171 1,898 1,877 1,877 Add New Portable Capacity 42 Subtract Portable Capacity (273) (21) Adjusted Portable Capacity 2,171 2,171 2,171 1,898 1,877. 1 877 11877 SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 1,392 1,343 1 1,176 1 355 1 669 366 ' 175 24 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARY-ELFmFN,rARY SCHOOLS Budget - Proiceted -- Calendar Year 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 CAPACITY School Ycar 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 BUILDING PROGRAM I TEA D COUNT CA PA CITY 8,462 8,462 8,462 8,462 9,102 9,262 9,262 FTECAPACITY 8.462 8,462 8,462 ;:8,462 9,102 9,262 9,262 Add/Subtract capacity total Add capacity at: Lake Grove 160 Mirror Lake 205 Olympic View 160 Star take 145 Wildwood 130 A d'us ted Program Headcount Capacity 9,462 8,462 8,462 9,102 9,262 9,262 9,262 Adjusted Program FTE Capacity 8,462 8,462 8462 7:9,102 9262 9262 9,M2 ENROLLMENT Basic FTE Enrollment 9,748 9,621 9,561 9,615 9,725 9,8(X 9,880 Internet Academy(AAFTE)� (36) (36) (36) (36) (3(, (`}t) (36D Basic FTE Enrollment without Internet Academy9,712 9,585 9,525 :9,579 ,9689 9,770 9.844 SURPLUS OR(UNHOUS ED) PROGRAMCA'PACITY (l 2.50.` (1,l230 4 063 "(477) 1 (427) I508Y 1 (582 RELOCATABLF,CAPACITY2 Current Portable Capacity 1,029 1,071 1,071 1,071 798 777 777 Add/Subtract portable capacity Add portable capacity at: Nautilus 42 Subtract portable capacity at: Mirror Lake (126) Olympic View (21) Star Lake (63) W ildwood (84) Adjusted Portable Capacity 1,071 1.071 L071 '''798 ;777 777 777. SURPLUS OR(UNHOIIS P:D) PROGRAM AND RF]LOCATABLF. i CAPACITY7��79 ' (52) 8 '. 321 350 269 195 i. NOTES: 1 Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities. 2 Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available.This is a calculated number only, The actual number of portables that will be used will be based on actual student population needs. 'fhe District may begin to pull portables from the instructional inventory. Age and condition of tire portables will detennine feasibility for continued instructional use. 25 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARY-MIDDLE SCHOOLS Budect -- Projected - - Calendar Year i 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 CAPACITY School Year '2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 202E 22 2022 23 2023-24 BUILDING PROGRAM I 1EADCOUNTCAPACITY 5,275 5,275 5,275 5,275 5,275 5,275 '.. 5,275 FTEC?APACITY 5,249 5,249 5,249 5,249 5,249 5r249 5,249 Add/Subtract capacity Adjusted Program Headcount Capacity 5,275 1 5,275 5,275 5,275 5,275 5,275 5,275 Adjusted Program FTE Capacity 5249 5,249 1 5,249 ``5,249 5,249 5249 5,249 ENROLLMENT Basic FTE Enrollment 5,105 5,166 5,422 5,496 5,421 5,294 5,270 Internet Academy (AAFTL)1 ('74) ('74) ('74) (74) (74) ('74 � (74) BasicFTEEnrollment without Internet:Academ ( 5,031 : 5,092 5,348 5,422 5347 5220 5,196 S URPLUS OR(UNHOUS ED) PROGRAMCAPACITY 218 157 (99 (173) (98) 29 53 RELOCATAB LE CAPACITY2 Current Portable Capacity 325 325 325 325 325 325 325 Add/Subtract portable capacity Adjusted Portable Capacity 325 325 325 325 325 325 325 SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 543 ' 482 226 152 1 227 3S4 378 NOTES: 1 Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities. 2 Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available.This is a calculated number only, The actual number ofportables that will be used will be based on actual student population needs. The District may begin to pull portables from the instructional inventory. Age and condition of the portables will determine feasibility for continued instructional use. 26 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARY-HIGH SCHOOLS Budget -- Proiceted-- Calendar Year 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 _ 2023 CAPACITY ''.School Year 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 BUILDING PROGRAM H1 ADCOUN'f CAPACITY 5,714 5,714 51714 5,714 5,714 5,714 5,714 FTL CAPACITY 6,111 6,111 ` 6,111 6,111 6,111 6111 6,1.11 Add/Subtract capacity Thomas Jefferson Iligh School° Adjusted Program Headcount Capacity 5,714 5,714 5,714 5,714 5,714 1 5,714 5,714 Ad'us led Program FTE Capacity 6,111 . 6,111 1 6,111 6,111 6,111 6,111 6,111 ENROLLMENT Basic FTE Enrollment 6,063 61178 6,149 6,209 6,359 6,548 6,689 Internet Academy (AAFTE)1 (205) (205) (205) (2€)5) (2()5} (205) (205) Basic FA without Internet Academy 5,858 5,973 5,944 ,.6,004 6,154 6;343 6AC'A SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) PROGRAM CAPACITY 253 _: 138 167 107 t 3) (232 Q373 RELOCATABLECAPAC FN' Current Portable Capacity 775 775 775 1 775 1 775 775 775 Add/Subtract portable capacity Adjusted Portable Capacity 775 775 775 775 775 1 775 775 S URPLIIS OR(UNHOUS ED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE CAPACITY' T1,028 113 942 882 732 543 402 NOTES: 1. Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities, 2 Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available. This is a calculated number only. The actual number of portables that will be used will be based on actual student population needs. The District may begin to pull portables from the instructional inventory. Age and condition of the portables will determine feasibility for continued instructional use. 3. Capacity for unhoused students will be accommodated with traveling teachers and no planning time in some classrooms. 4 Current project timelines estimate the completion ofThomas Jefferson HS in 2024. 27 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN King County, the City of Federal Way, and the City of Kent Impact Fee Calculations Single and Multi-Family Residences Each jurisdiction that imposes school impact fees requires that developers pay these fees to help cover a share of the impact of new housing developments on school facilities. To determine an equitable fee throughout unincorporated King County, a formula was established. This formula can be found in King County Code 21A and was substantially adopted by the City of Federal Way and Kent. The formula requires the District to establish a "Student Generation Factor" which estimates how many students will be added to a school district by each new single or multi-family unit and to gather some standard construction costs, which are unique to that district. - STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR ANALYSIS Federal Way Public Schools student generation factor was determined separately for single-family units and multi-family units. The factors used in the 2018 Capital Facilities Plan were derived using actual generation factors from single-family units and multi-family units that were constructed in the District in the last five (5) years - IMPACT FEE CALCULATION On page 30, the 2018 variables for the calculation of the Impact Fee for single family and multi-family units based on King County Code 21A and the Growth Management Act, generate the results below: Plan Year 2017 Plan Year 2018 Single Family Units $3,198 $6,842 Multi-Family Units $8,386 $20,086 Mixed-Use Residential' $4,193 $10 043 A year over year comparison of formula variables can be found on page 33. In accordance with the City of Federal Way Ordinance No.95-249. 28 c n M O o) N M O N O O — C r M (O N 0) 0 (D O 0 O M (D V (O O M N o y r (D 0 (O 0 -O ; O M M O n N M IT 00 0 O O M N (D V V (D M ill M O It O y O.r N N N LL o o o o 0 0 0 o 0 o G ~ N IL r o r a- 0 0 L C n n 0) n V M (O O) L C "O 0 r m W U O) y (D (O O V) M W W 01 n n N U y '.O r U) N (n C U 07 0W (D O N O N N r a y D U ILo r m N 0 0 0 0 0 r N r N 7 01 IN r M M Ol N LL o :O 0 0 0 0 616 0 o C N LL':o 0 o 0 2 S O O O O V C M :0 m M O N V O0 m N p C N M W y O M '.� O M M V of (D 0 O 0 0'.N V N N N V V M W M o m O m w O N N V 0'.N n (O M N O N '.O O r O — r r r N r 07 O',N O N N 'z V y LL o 0 00 o 0 0 0 0 0 G a N IL O 0 0 0 d v a a W S c env no � N nV LO o 3c �•mrrn o F. c 01 a0+ M N V O M W ',N (U (O O � c 0) 2�N r 0 rr 0J 9 U (D i11 l0 O V (D O 0) M n N _ 01 V U i`7 r W a E w 10 O r V '- N N r ',N r r N E O ry',O r (O 10 U y y LL o 0 0 0 o o 0 0 o o 0 O N LL 0 0 0 0 d W b W W 0 O }2 C 0 p49 J� i•• 01 U y 01 U c (D M O. z OJ a N •O n .- (n M N a :n N V a y a N M r n d oo EL U ELY Z =N G Z = N CIA fj wm o wv o rn a0 L U) (D y d n N O Q a U ? N N r ITN N V O v n a O ; N r N E « E U O Z 9 y aqi Z v N U V a a" w e mo (D o M n y c moo rno r r M n M IT M (D !� a N 9 M M n N d E E , E E r r " 3 0) N 7 0 y 3 Z Ill Z W .a W >1 Ca c E `o ' W c 4) E e LL E a N O M N M V N M V E LL d N N N 0 Z o.� Z �.'� 0 NI 0 m N a k W C c N F O r O N u W W E c a m .E 3 m a c !4 m m O N 0) co W W E' O (� 0 O a)W U' EL c ~ « J c D 2 �O O c Cm c N 01 «c (f0a 0 0 (n OJO0 d U0 N C cuW � U)d0 Z n c01 IL U0r ) YYd Y FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN IMPACT FEE School Site Acquisition Cost: Student Student Facility Cost/ Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Acreage Acre Capacity SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary 022001'.. 0.5970 $0 $0 Middle School 0.1202 02369 $0 $0 High School ..� -4.85 $216,718 " 51 0,1429 0.32281 $2,942 $6,646 TOTALI 2.942 $6.646 School Construction Cost: Student Student % Perm P'acd Facility Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Tot Ft Cost Ca..acit SFR MFR SF'R MFR Elementary 94.09% $38,934,000 800''.. 0.2200'.. 0.5970 $10,074 $27,337 Middle School ,, ,,,,,,,,, 9726% ......... 0.1202 0.2369 $0 $0 High School )6.98% $9,867,000 . .... 1501 0.1429 ..6.3228 $9,116 S20.593 TOTAL 1 $19,190 $47,930 Temporary Facility Cost: Student Student %'Temp Fac. Facility Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Total,S"C Ft Cost CapacilX SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary 5.91% $172,993 42 0.2200 0.5970 $54 $145 Middle School 2.74% _ 0.1202 0.2369 $D $0 High School 3.02% 0.14290.3228 SO $0 TOTAL $54 $145 State Matching Credit Calculation: Student Student Construction Cost Sq.Ft. State Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Allocation/Se Ft Student Match SFR MFR SIR MFR Elementary $213.23 90' 65.59'70 0.2200 0.5970 S2.769 $7,515 Middle School $213.23 ...... - " ' """""""""" 0.1202 0.2369 V) $0 I I �h Scoo] _.1 I'll S21., ,. ..................... ,_.. tg 3.23 130 65.59°/, 0.1429 03228 $2,598 $5,869 Total $5367 S13,384 Tax Payment Credit Calculation SFR MFR Average Assessed Value (March 2017) $294,329 $109,489 Capital Bond Interest Rate(March 2017) 3.95% 3.95% Net Present Value of Average Dwelling $2,393,217 $890,268 Years Amortized 10 ,,,,,,,,, l0 Property Tax Levy Rate $1,31 $1.31,,,,,, ..... Present Value of Revenue Stream $3,135 $1,166 Single Family Multi-Family Mixed-Use Residences Residences Residential` Mitigation Fee Summary Site Acquisition Cost $2,942 $ 6,646 $ 6,646 Permanent Facility Cost $19,190 $ 47,930 S 47,930 'Temporary Facility Cost $54 $ 145 $ 145 State Match Credit $ (5,367) $ (13,384) S (13,384) Tax Payment Credit $ 3,135 $ (1,166) $ (1,166) Sub-Total $ 13,683 $ 40,171 $ 40,171 50%Local Share $ 6,842 $ 20,086 $ 20,086 Calculated Im)acI Fee $. 6,842 S 20,086 $ 10,043 In accordance with the City of Federal Way Ordinance No.95-249 30 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 4 SUMMARY OF CHANGES FROM THE 2017 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN The 2018 Capital Facilities Plan is an updated document, based on the 2017 Capital Facilities Plan. The changes between the 2017 Plan and the 2018 Plan are listed below. SECTION I - THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SIX-YEAR FINANCE PLAN The Six Year Finance Plan has been rolled forward to reflect 2018-2024 and adjusted for anticipated Federal Way High School construction schedule and anticipated new construction based on a November 2017 bond vote. The plan is found on page 9. SECTION III - SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION CAPACITY Changes to the Building Program Capacities calculation are found on page 17, PORTABLES The list of portables reflects the movement of portables between facilities or new portables purchased. Portable Locations can be found on page 19. STUDENT FORECAST The Student Forecast now covers 2018 through 2024 Enrollment history and projections are found on page 22. CAPACITY SUMMARY The changes in the Capacity Summary are a reflection of the changes in the capacities and student forecast. New schools and increased capacity at current buildings are shown as increases to capacity. Capacity Summaries are found on pages 24-27. IMPACT FEE CALCULATION - KING COUNTY CODE 21A The Impact Fees have changed as a result of changes in several factors. The updates made to the variables in the Impact Fee calculation, generate a change in the Impact Fee between the 2017 Capital Facilities Plan and the 2018 Capital Facilities Plan. A summary of these changes can be found on page 32 and 33. 31 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN IMPACT FEE CALCULATION CHANGES FROM 2017 TO 2018 STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS Student Generation factors are based on rates for new developments constructed over a period of not more than five years prior to the date of the fee calculation. The changes in student Generation factors between the 2017 Capital Facilities Plan and the 2019 Capital Facilities Plan are due to developments that were deleted or added based upon the age of the developments and the year placed in the survey. The Student Generation worksheet is found on page 29. SCHOOL CONSTR UCTION COSTS The anticipated cost based on the estimate for replacing Thomas Jefferson High is $149,500,000. For Impact Fee calculation, the District will use the estimated Maximum Allowable Construction Cost of$89,700,000, which is 60% of the total anticipated cost. The replacement will add a total of 200 additional seats, with 50 seats dedicated for preschool capacity. Only additional capacity for grade 9-12 seats will be used in the impactfee calculation. The current permanent capacity of Thomas Jefferson High is 1309. The addition of 150 grade 9-12 seats will increase permanent capacity by 11%. ----- ----- .m . Total Cost $149,500,000x.6x.11 = $9,867,000 The anticipated cost bared on the estimate for replacing Lake Grove, Mirror Lake, Olympic View, Star Lake, and Wildwood elementaries is$154,500,000. For Impact Fee calculation, the District will use the estimated Maximum Allowable Construction Cost of $92,700,000, which is 60%of the total anticipated cost. The replacement will add a total of 960 additional seats. The additional seats will include new preschool capacity at Lake Grove, Mirror Lake, and Star Lake and 6-8 capacity at Olympic View, as well as adding additional K-5 capacity. Only capacity for grade K-5 seats will be used in the impact fee calculation. The current permanent capacity of these schools is 1902. The addition of 800 Qrade K-5 seats will increase permanent capacity by 42%. _ Total Cost $154,500,000 x.6 x.42 =$38,934,000 SCHOOL ACQUI.SIT"ION COSTS The district purchased the Norman Center to house the Employment Transition Program and to allow,for the expansion of the ECEAP program. The purchase and use of this site increased our high school permanent capacity by 51 students. Total Cost $2,100,00012 =$1,050,000 Cost per Acre $1,050,000/4.85 =$216,718 The District will use the above formulas created as a base for the 2018 Capital Facilities Plan. The capacity of these schools may vary from year to year as programs are added or changed and construction cost may increase over time. 32 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN IMPACT FEE CALCULATION CHANGES FROM 2017 TO 2018 Item From/To Comment Percent of Permanent Facilities 95.30% to 95.86% Report#3 OSPI Percent Temporary Facilities 4.70% to 4_14% Updated portable inventory Average Cost of Portable $178,686 to $172,993 Updated 5-yr rolling average of Classrooms portables purchased and placed by 2016. Construction Cost Allocation $213.23 to $213.23 Change effective July 2016 State Match 65.59% to 65.59"/a Change effective July 2016 Average Assessed Value Per Puget Sound Educational SFR- $274,781 to $294,328 Service District(ESD 121) MFR- $106,352 to $109,489 Capital Bond Interest Rate 3.27%to 3.95% Market Rate Properly Tax Levy Rate $1.37 to S 1.31 King County'Freasury Division Student Generation Factors Updated Housing inventory Single-Family Note.Student generationfactorsfor m'e Elementary .2471 to .2200 single family units are based on new developments constructed H4thitt the District Middle School .1408 to .1202 over the last five(S)years prior to the date of I Iigh School .1379 to .1429 thefee calculation. Multi-Family - Student generation factors for are multi- Elementary .5375 to .5970 family units are based an new developments constructed within the District over the Last Middle School .2813 to .2369 -ftve(5)years przor to the date ofdve fee High School .2594 to .3228 calculation. Impact Fee SFR- $3,198 to $6,842 SFR based on the updated calculation MFR - $8,386 to $20,086 MFR based on the updated calculation 33 The Ends A BRIGHT FLITLJRF FOR EACH SCHOLAR In an environment of equity, regardless of race, soclo economics, language, cultural backgrounds and other exc,eptionalitles, each scholar will graduate with the academic knowledge and 21st century skills, ready to succeed as a responsible citizen. SUB END 1 - EACH SE.°I•IC"tLAR - GRADUATION AND ADVANCEMENT' Each student will graduate with the prerequisite skills and confidence to access college, career, and other post-secondary experiences. SUB END 2 — A DREAM -ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT Each telrraahir°, at every grade leve4 Will perforrn gut or above the m ate or district standards in all disciplines.. ;SUB END 3 ... A V WE "a 'HOLE GI flLD PERSON RESRt:`N SMIL;IT'Y AllklD crri' 'IE:I'rlSlll-OP Eacllhr scholllaair imwr ll he e rnlpowered to take irsws,Paa nr .�lblll'ity for Ial�,"lroa.ir LLar.aslla�olra'iro rro�Irar:cesbs uaind exihIdit posuiIvan„ etIhtuc al bellli ,'�araiasrs, t r eratirrrt otl eirsa with 6gnliIar and respect, tiFEDERAL WAY Federal Way Public Schools P 33330 8"Avenue S PUBLIC SCHOOLS Federal Way, Washington 98003 (253) 945-2000 This document is published by the Business Services Department of the Federal Way Public Schools. May 2017 WrAll HI I,G LI N Capital Planning and Construction Department P U B L I C S C H o 0 L S G.Scott Hodgins,Executive Director 17810 V Avenue South,Bldg.A Burien,WA 981478 Office: 206-631-7500 August 7, 2017 City of Kent Economic and Community Development Charlene Anderson, Planning Manager 400 W. Gowe ##300 Kent, WA 98032 Dear Charlene, The Highline Public Schools' Board of Directors adopted its 2017 Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) on July 26, 2017. Please find enclosed a copy of the 2017 CFP. The District Is looking forward to working with the City of Kent in the next several months to develop acceptable language for a school impact fee ordinance for the Council's consideration. Denise Stiffarm, Pacifica Law Group (legal counsel), and I are available to meet with city staff to answer any questions with regard to the scope of the district's 2017 CFP and impact fee calculations for single and multi-family residential units. Sincerely, t od�ks Executive Director cc: D. Stiffarm r,i -IICHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 401 CAPITAL I+ACIL.ITIES PLAN 2017-2022 HI HLINE P U B l I C S C H O O T S f1 Pwllr fa r4cce rs�a- ev..l y.IGadr,hl Board Introduction: June 21, 2017 Adoption: July 26, 2017 HIGHLINL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 401 CAPITAL FACILITIFS PLAN 2017-2022 HIHLIII . P U B I C s c H o o L s AP.wh 1e sHcesss erery JGdenr BOARD OF DIRECTORS Bernie Dorsey, President Joe Van, Vice President Angelica Alvarez Tyrone Curry, Sr. Michael D. Spear SUPERINTENDENT Dr. Susan Enfield Table of Contents Page Introduction..............................---....................,....,..,,..,...,........................................,................,....1 Educational Program Standard ..............-.................................................................... ....................3 Capital Facilities Inventory................................................... Student Enrollment Trends and Projections ....................................................................................9 Capital Facilities Projections for Future Needs ..............-..................................................... .......10 FinancingPlan ...............................................................................................................................14 SchoolImpact Fees..................................--..................................................................................16 AppendixA: District Map .......................................................................................................... A-1 Appendix B: Population and Enrollment Data ............................................................................B-1 Appendix C: School Impact Fee Calculations .............................................................................C-1 Appendix D: Student Generation Rates .........................................---....................................... D-1 For information regarding the Highline School District's 2017-2022 Capital Facilities Plan, contact G. Scott Hudgins, Executive Director, Capital Planning and Construction, Hightine School District No.401, 17810 8"Avenue South, Building A,Burien, Washington 98148. Telephone: (206)63I-7500 SECTION ONE: INTRODUCTION Purpose of the Capital Facilities Plan This Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan has been prepared by the Highline School District (the "District") as the District's primary facility planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act (the "GMA") and King County Council Code Title 21A. The Plan was prepared using data available in May 2017. The GMA outlines 13 broad goals including adequate provision of necessary public facilities and services. Schools are among these necessary facilities and services. School districts have adopted capital facilities plans to satisty the requirements of RCW 36.70A.070 and to identify additional school facilities necessary to meet the educational needs of the growing student populations anticipated in their districts. The Highline School District(the"District") has prepared this Capital Facilities Plan (the "CFP") to provide King County (the "County") and the cities of Burien, Des Moines, Kent, Normandy Park, SeaTac, and Tukwila with a schedule and financing program for capital improvements over the next six years (2017-2022). This Plan will be updated annually with any changes to the impact fee schedule adjusted accordingly. Executive Summary After a period of low enrollment growth, the District has experienced steady and significant enrollment increases since 2010. The District currently serves an approximate student population of 19,199(October I,2016 enrollment)with 18 elementary schools(grades K-6), five middle level schools (grades 7-8), and five high schools (grades 9-12). In addition, the District has alternative programs: Big Picture (Ms and ❑s) at the Manhattan site; CHOICF. Academy (MS and HS) at the Woodside site; New Start (9-12) at the Salmon Creek Site; and Puget Sound Skills Center ("PSSC"). Over the last t4 years the District has embarked on a major capital improvement effort to enhance its facilities to meet current educational and life-safety standards. Since 2002 the District has passed three major capital bonds: one in 2002 for approximately $189,000,000, one in 2006 for approximately $148,000,000, and one in 2016 for approximately $299,850,000. The 2002 and 2006 bonds were used For replacement of existing facilities and not to accommodate increased enrollment. The 2016 bonds are earmarked for a combination of improvements to/replacement of existing facilities and the provision of new capacity. With the approved capital bond funds and reimbursements from the Office of the Superintendent Of Public Instruction, the State of Washington, the Port of Seattle, the Federal Aviation Administration and private donations for a new Raisbeck Aviation High School the District has designed, permitted and constructed 13 new elementary schools, 1 new high school, renovated 3 _ l - schools as interim facilities,and renovated portions of Memorial Field and Camp Waskowitz. All of this work has been done since March 2002. The District's 2016 bond proposal was based on the recommendations of a Capital Facilities Advisory Committee ("CFAC"), a citizens' committee representing every part the District. The committee met for a year to study the District's facilities needs, review data, such as enrollment projections and building conditions, and analyze various solutions. CFAC developed a long-term facilities plan, which includes the 2016 bond as the first phase of a four-phase plan to meet students' needs over the next 20 years. As the District looks ahead it recognizes that anticipated enrollment growth, some of which will be caused by new development, and implementation of recent legislation will require the District either to add new facilities, add additions to existing facilities, renovate existing facilities, or add portables to existing facilities. This UP identifies the current enrollment, the current capacity of each educational facility, the projected enrollment over the six-year planning period and how the District plans to accommodate this growth. It also includes a schedule of impact fees that should be charged to new development. Based on current projections, the District needs to add capacity at the elementary and middle school levels to accommodate projected enrollment and implementation of recent legislation. To address these needs,the District plans to build a new elementary to replace Des Moines Elementary School to increase its student capacity, add classrooms at existing elementary schools, and build one new middle school. In addition, new modular or portables may need to be added at individual elementary schools and middle schools to accommodate future enrollment. At this time it has been assumed that additional land will not be needed to accommodate the new schools; however, land will be necessary in the future to support the District's long range facilities plan and the Educational Strategic Plan. - 2 - SECTION 2—STANDARD OF SERVICE King County Code 2IA.06 refers to a"Standard of Service"that each school district must establish in order to ascertain its overall capacity. School facility and student capacity needs are dictated by the types and amounts of space required to accommodate the District's adopted educational program. The educational program standards which typically drive facility space needs include grade configuration, optimum facility size, class size, educational program offerings, classroom utilization and scheduling requirements, and use of reloeatable classrooms- (pot-tables). District educational program standards may change in the future as a result of changes in the education program, special programs class sizes, grade span configurations, and use of new technology, as well as other physical aspects of the school facilities. In addition, the State Legislature's implementation of requirements for reduced K-3 class size will also impact school capacity and educational program standards. (The District currently offers full-day kindergarten.) The school capacity inventory will be reviewed periodically and adjusted for any changes to the educational program standards.These changes will also be reflected in future updates of this CCp. The Standard of Service outlined below reflects only those programs and educational opportunities provided to students that directly affect the capacity of school buildings. The special programs listed below require classroom space,thus the permanent capacity of some buildings housing these programs has been reduced. Table l Class Size—Standard of'Service ___. .... Grade Level Average Class Slze Based on Standard ofService Kindergarten �4 Crades 1 —3 25* .............._.................. ._ Grades 4—6 27 Grades 7—8 30 Grades 9— 12 32 ._ mm *The Districtstandard for K l will change to 17 l m 2019(see T able 7). It is not possible to achieve 100%utilization of all regular teaching stations throughout the day. Therefore, classroom capacity is adjusted using a utilization factor of available teaching stations depending on the physical characteristics of the facility and educational program needs. - 3 - Elementary School Standard of Service Models • Special education for students with disabilities may be provided in self- contained classrooms. • All students are provided music instruction in a separate classroom. • All students will have scheduled time in a special classroom. • Identified students will also be provided other educational opportunities in classrooms designated as follows: • Resource Rooms • English Language Learners (ELL) • Education for Disadvantaged Students (Title 1) • Gifted Education • Learning Assisted Programs • Severely Behavior Disorder Transition Rooms • Mild, Moderate, and Severe Disabilities • Developmental Kindergarten • Extended Daycare Programs and Preschool Programs Secondary School Standard of Service Models Identified students will also be provided other educational opportunities in classrooms designated as follows: • Resource Rooms • English Language Learners (ELL) • Computer Labs • Science Labs Career and Vocational Rooms • Daycare Programs • Alternative Program Spaces . 4 - SECTIONTHREE: CAPIIAL FACILITIES INVENTORY This section provides an inventory of capital facilities owned and operated by the District including schools and relocatable classrooms (modulars or portables). School facility capacity was inventoried based on the space required to accommodate the District's adopted educational program standards. See Section Two. Standard of Service. A map showing locations of District facilities is provided in Appendix A. Schools See Section One for a description of the District's schools and programs. School capacity was determined based on the number of teaching stations (or general classrooms) within each building and the space requirements of the District's currently adopted current educational program and internal targets as reported in [COS with the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction. It is this capacity calculation that is used to establish the District's baseline capacity, and to determine future capacity needs based on projected student enrollment. The school capacity inventory is summarized in Tables 2, 3, and 4. As the District implements reduced K-3 class size requirements and grade reconfiguration, the inventory will reflect adjustments in the Standard of Service (see Tables 7-13 and 7-C). Relocatable Classrooms (Portables) Relocatable classrooms (portables) are used as interim classroom space to house students until funding can be secured to construct permanent classrooms. The District currently uses 27 relocatable classrooms at various school sites throughout the District to provide additional interim general classroom capacity. A typical relocatable classroom can provide capacity for a full-size class of students. Current use of relocatable classrooms throughout the District is summarized in Table 5. -5- Tahle 2 Elementary School Level Inventory ----- — __.._... .. .......... _.._ BuilrlingArea Teaching Permanent Elementary School (sq.ft.) Stations* Capacity** Beverly Park at Glendale ES 58,145 22 514 Bow Lake ES 76,108 30 666 Cedarhurst ES 68,916 26 619 Des Moines ES 41,766 19 471 _.................. __ _... ,,,. —..........._.._........._—..........,,,.._......._m.................,.. Gregory Heights ES 65,978 27 585 Hazel Valley ES 65,346 26 �—�....... 452 --�-� Hilltop ES 51 532 24 594 Madrona ES 69,240 25 598 Marvista US 68,462 _...._.__.. 27 6 1,,. McMicken heights ES 69,979 25 582 Midway ES 66,096 25 610 Mount View ES 67,783 26 628 _.N_orthHill_l ES _.--- _ . .. _.... 65,665 27 636 ParksideES 68,857 .2G_.._._....., .,�..-....622'..... —... ..........w.. _ ------ . Seahurst ES 59,967 27 585 __.—_.._ ood E —._ ShorewS 60,326 22 483—_..._..----- uthem H — -- Soetgh[s ES 32,942 IS II — 336 - White Center US 65 654 26 622 TOTAL 1,122,762 445 10,231 "Teaching Station definition: A space designated as a classroom.Other stations include spaces designated fur special education and pull-out programs. **General classrooms -6- Table 3 Middle School Level Inventory*** _...... _............ .............. Middle School Builtlr'ngArea Teaching Stations* Permanent (sq.Jt.) Capacity** - — Cascade MS 90,582 _ --- -------9 34 86— Chinook MS 87,476 27 783 Pacific MS 73,941 24 696 __,_ .____ _.._.._.._ .,..... _. ._._ ._., ,_.._ ... .. _.. _..___.__....._,_._... Sylvester._.MS 92,617.. 30 870 Big Picture MS tar Manhaaan)^ 2 58 ___ Choice (a1 t oodside) ` 2 58 TOTAL 344,616 119 3 45l aching S"Tetation Definition: A space designated as a general classroom. Other stations include spaces designated for special education and pull-out programs. **General classrooms, ***Does not include alternative programs: CHOICE Academy MS/HS al Woodside site. "The District anticipates that the Big Picture and Choice programs will be relocated in the 2019-20 school year to another District facility or leased space. Inventory adjustments will be reflected in future updates to this Capital Facilities Plan. Table 4 High School Level Inventory*** Building Area Teaching Permanent High School (sq.ft.) Stations* Capacity** - -------- -------- _.. Raisbeck Aviation HS 87,934 14 448 ._...._............_.......... Big Picture HS tat alanhauan)^ 29,141 10 320 Evergreen HS 161,456 48 1,536 .. _ ______________ ....._, ...,__........ ...._...._...._,. Highline HS 214,919 70 2,240 _.--.. __ �..._.....—_.._ _.___................. Mount Rainier HS 205,159 47 1,504 Tyee HS..,_. . . .. ........_.. .. 143,101 .... 38 - 1,216 TOTALS 841,710 227 7,264^^ * feaehhtg Station defindion A space designated as r general uC rssrtratm.Other stations include spaces designated for special education and pull-out programs. ** Regular classrooms. ***Does not include alternative programs: CHOICE Academy NiS/HS al Woodside site; New Start HS at Salmon Creek site;and Puget Sound Skills Center. ^The District anticipates that the Big Picture program will he relocated in the 2019-20 school year to another District facility or leased space. Inventory adjustments will be reflected in future updates to this Capital Facilities Plan. ^"Total capacity at the high school level may he affected as the District makes programmatic changes in its small school high schools:Tyec HS and Evergreen HS. For example,spaces currently identified as teaching stations may be needed to serve special programs. -7- Table 5 Reloeatable Classrooms(Portable) Inventory ......... _... Elementary School Relocatables** Other* * Interim Capacity _ ... ........_.._..... _......-_�.........__. ._............. _.._.... __.,,_..._._......_. Beverly Park at Glendale 0 2 0 Bow Lake _._...... 0 .... _,....... 4 ...... 0 ............_..-- ------_____m_......... - ___._ _------ ___ ...m..._.__ Cedarhurst 1 3 25 �.. ............ .. .... . Des Moines 0 1 0 -.._ —_.. ._._._... .. ..... _......... _.. .... _.._.... .. _..__._ .....,.. _.,.,.._..�...._...,� Gregory Heights 0 0 0 Hazel Valley _._. ..... ........ ..._.._. -7 3 I 75 I[illtop 5 I 125 -- ... — Madrona 2 0 ...._....50 Marvista 2 0 50 McMicken Heights 0 0 p ..... , .. �.._... --- _. - ....... Midway 4 0 too - ........... Mount View 4 0 l00 North Hill _......._........_._ .... ...._ - 0 .... _. Parkside 0 -. .....___..... ........_..__ ..._....___.__. .,.... __...._._.....- ._,... ........... .., ...__....._.,,,_._..___..._._..._.�... Seahurst 2 2 50 „._..........m . ..__ — Shorewood l "3 .. ...._------------ . _...._.._ .... _......._.. ....- ...... w _. Southern Heights 2 1 50 White Center TOTAL _ ..... . ..27...._..... Vlidrlk School Relocatables** Other *** Interim Capacity Cascade _ ...... . .... 0 _._3 .....,___0 -- _ 4s Pacific 4 0 116 F .y S ester_....._ . _,_ 2 58 _..._ ._. .._..--- _ ............. . ig PiCtUre MS 4 7 116 TOTAL 15 13 _ 435 ... ..._.. _..._ ......... _. .............. ..._.___ -------- RatsbeckAviatSchool on HS Relocatabfe** Other*** Interim Capacity l_ 0 0 _"t"t"t_ - —. ........ ...._ ............. _. Big Piohtre HS 0 0 0 _._w.__ __........ _.... . .....�__, ._ ...... _. Evergreen HS 3 2 96 IhghlmeHS 0 O. 0. Mount Rainier HS 0 0 0 .. — ..- TOTALS 3 3__._._. _ )6 **Used for regular classroom capacity. ***The relocatables referenced under"other relocatables"are used for special pull-out programs, storage, community use,etc. .8- SECTIONFOUR: STUDENT ENROLLMENT TRENDS.4NDPROJECTIONS Generally, enrollment projections using historical calculations are most accurate for the initial years of the forecast period. Moving further into the future, more assumptions about economic conditions, land use, and demographic trends in the area affect the projection. Monitoring birth rates in the County and population growth for the area are essential yearly activities in the ongoing management of the CFP. In the event that enrollment growth slows, plans for new facilities can be delayed. It is much more difficult, however, to initiate new projects or expedite projects in the event enrollment growth exceeds the projections. With the assistance of a professional demographer, the District has developed its own methodology for forecasting future enrollments. This methodology, a modified cohort survival method, considers a variety of factors to evaluate the potential student population growth for the years 2017 through 2022. These factors include: projected births, projected growth in the K-12 population, and a model which considers growth in population and housing within the District's boundaries. The methodology also considers the potential impacts on enrollment due to the recent opening of a charter school within the District's boundaries. Certain assumptions are made regarding the continued enrolment at the charter school. Therefore, the methodology and the resulting projections should be considered conservative. District enrollment has increased in recent years, including a 7 2% increase since 2009. Using the modified cohort survival projections, a total enrollment of20,236 students is expected in 2022. In other words, the District projects an increase of 5.4% in student enrollment or 1,037 students) between 2016 and 2022. See Appendix B (Enrollment projections from Les Kendrick, January 2017.j Tuhle 6 Projected Student Enrollment 2017-2022 Actual Percent Projection 2016" 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Change Change 19,199 19,344 19,390 19512 19,653 19,918 M236 1 1,037 5.4% 'Actual Oclober 2016 amol Imes[ _Q_ SECTION FIVE: CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECTIONS FOR FUTURE NEEDS Projected future capacity needs, shown in Tables 7-A through 7-C, are derived by applying the projected number of students to the projected permanent capacity. It is not the District's policy to include relocatable classrooms when determining future capital facility needs; therefore, interim capacity provided by relocatable classrooms is not included in this analysis.The District will utilize relocatables as necessary to address interim capacity needs. Information on relocatable classrooms by grade level and interim capacity can be found in Table 5. Information on planned construction projects can be found in the Financing Plan, Table 8. Recent state-level policy decisions impact the District's capacity analysis. Engrossed Senate House Bill 2261, adopted in 2009, requires school districts to implement full-day kindergarten by 2018. SHB 2776, passed in 2010, requires school districts to reduce K-3 class sizes to 17 students per teacher. Finally, in November 2015, the voters passed Initiative 1351, which requires reduced class sizes across all grades (K-12). The District has proactively implemented full day kindergarten, which reduced the number of available regular classrooms in elementary schools distrietwide. Table 7 assumes that K-3 class size reduction is implemented by 2019 and that grade levels are reconfigured to K-5, 6-9, and 9-12 in 2020. All scenarios include the capacity related projects the District is planning during the six-year planning period. Future updates to this Plan will incorporate any funded implementation of Initiative 1351. -to- Table 7 Projected Student Capacity-2017 through 2022 Deaveenta ,School Lev e[ ,9urtafut^T Iclenct, 2016* 2017 im T 20197 2020A 2021 2022 ..... ...... Existing Permanent Capacity 10,231 10,231 10,231 9,034 9,264 9,576 9,576 Added Perranent Capacity 0 0 0 230' 312" 0 0 _ Total Permanent Capacity** 10,231 10,231 10,231 9,264 9,576 9,376 9,576 -------- Enrollment ............ 10,671 t0,801 10,983 11,119 9,476 9,562 91626 Surplus (Defcicne y) 440 570 752) (1,855 l** ( ) ( ) ( ) 00 14 (50) Permanent Ca aci ._......._..__..___-._._..._....._ ______......_.___.._.,........m...._._..._............. '"Actt"e!October wCf 16 cnrpl6mcN "Does not include portable capacity 'Implementation of reduced K-3 class size and adjusted Standard of Service "Movement of 6"grade to middle school level and adjusted Standard of Service 'Addition of new classrooms at existing elementary schools "New Des Moines Elementary School opens at the Zenith site with added capacity Middle School Level--.Su )hrr e is ,11C 2016* 2017 2018 2019 2020AA loll 2022 Existing Permanent Capacity 3,451 3,451 3,451 3,451 4,401 4,401 _ 4,401 ---- Added Permanent Capacity 0 0 0 950, 0 0 0 Total Permanent Capacity** - 3,451 3,451 3,451 4,401 4,401 4,401 4,401 Enrollment 2 517 2,584 2,711 2,792 4,581 4,596 4,484 ..... _ Surplus(Dctwicncy)** 934 867 740 609 (l80) t95) (83) Permanent Capacity *s%c.tunl October 2016 cruollioe t_..�... .�....... _ **Does not include portable capacity ""Movement of 6th grade to middle school level and adjusted Standard of Service 'New middle school capacity added h School Level--Surlrlus/l9<;/Iclerrc,h 2016* 2017 '18 020 l_ �..__ . .,018 2019 2 021 loll ---------------------------------- _........__....._.._------- - __.. Existing Permanent Capacity 7,264 7,264 7,264 7,264 7,264 6,524" 6,524 Added Permanent Capacity 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ---------------..___......... __, ..,_...__.___....._.._. _._........ _ Total permanent Capacity** 7,264 7,264 7,264 7,264 7,264 6,524 6,524 Enrollment 6,011 5,959 5,696 5,601 5,596 5,759 6,126 w. -- - _ _ ---- Surplus(Deficiency)" 1253 1,305 1,568 1,663 1,668 765 398 Permanent Capacity Actual Octoher 2016 enrollment **Does not include portable capacity. "Highline High School re-opens with adjusted capacity. -II- SECTION SIX.- FINANCING PLAN Planned Improvements The Finance Plan focuses on L,I as it related projects needed to accommodate recent and projected growth in the District. Based upon the scenario presented in Table 3, the District will need to add permanent classroom capacity at both the elementary school and middle school grade levels. Pursuant to the Board's approval of the Capital Facilities Advisory Committee's final recommendations and the voters' approval of the 2016 bond, the District will: (1) add space to the new Des Moines Elementary School (replacement school at the Zenith site); (2)construct new elementary school classrooms at various sites, and (3) construct a new middle school. All new schools will be located on land currently owned by the District. In addition, new reloeatable classrooms(portables) may need to be added at individual elementary schools and middle schools to accommodate future enrollment or to provide interim classrooms until permanent classroom capacity is built. The District has identified "non-capacity" capital needs at existing schools including the replacement of Highline High School and safety/security improvements at various schools. Financing for Planned Improvements 1-'unding for planned improvements is typically secured from a number of sources including voter- approved bonds, State match funds, and impact fees. General Obligation Bonds: Bonds are typically used to fund construction of new schools and other capital improvement projects, and require a 60%voter approval. The District's voters in November 2016 approved by 66.99% a $299.85 million school construction bond to fund the projects identified in this Plan. State School Construction Assistance Program Funds: State School Construction Assistance Program ("SCAP") Funds come from the Common School Construction Fund, which is composed ofrevenues accruing predominantly from the sale of renewable resources(i.e.,timber) from State school lands set aside by the Enabling Act of 1889. If these sources are insufficient to meet needs, the Legislature can appropriate funds or the State Board of Education can establish a moratorium on certain projects. School districts may quality for State School Construction Assistance Funds for specific capital projects based on a prioritization system. The District received funding in the amount of$6.27 million from Senate Bill 6080 to address a portion of the classrooms needed for implementation of reduced K-3 class sines. -12- Impact Fees: Impact fees are a means of supplementing traditional funding sources for construction of public facilities needed to accommodate new development. See Section 7 School Impact Fees. The District also receives some funding toward school construction from the Port of Seattle/Federal Aviation Administration. This funding applies to the Des Moines Elementary Replacement and Addition project. The Six-Year Financing Plan shown on Table 8 demonstrates how the District intends to fund new construction and improvements to school facilities for the years 2017-2022. The financing components include bonds, SCAP funds, Port/FAA funds, and impact fees. The Financing Plan separates projects and portions of projects which add capacity from those which do not, since the Tatter are generally not appropriate for impact fee funding. Table 8 Capital Facilities Financing Plan Improvements Adding Permanent Capacity Costs(in Millions)** Project 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total Hands! Stale Impact PmIUFAA Cost Local Funds Fees '^'* Funds Elementary Schools 17c.Ibtoio I mmnlury Fr n( X ti. }; X F.epinocmonl and Additi:�n I Ir! eat °.I'sol 300 3(10 RkV.010 X 52 X l'[ nn!in r nuuv sife9 01I9) P�,mds N[iddle ScAools��� N,11 k jdl' +.hool 050 1 1 00, N WA )0 125 M h¢i 77,, X M r( X X ....................... ........................... Portable Portable, al V a,it„!y,Sites 200 ?0(I Z(I0 j( X High Schools ....._.____......._....,. _._.._..._......._ ...._..,__...._. __....._____ .. ,and Purchase ti20 Of)() X X (elementary site for future growth) "+WI prdjeafs are groo,di-,daled. ""*Construction costs used in impact fee formula are adjusted In recognize PordF AA funding. -13- SECTIONSEVEN: SCHOOL IMPACT FEES Fhe GMA authorizes jurisdictions to collect impact fees to supplement funding of additional public facilities needed to accommodate new development. Impact fees cannot be used for the operation, maintenance, repair, alteration, or replacement of existing capital facilities used to meet existing service demands. Impact fees in Appendix C have been calculated utilizing the formula in the King County Code. The resulting figures are based on the District's cost per dwelling unit to purchase land for school sites, make site improvements, construct schools. and purchase/install relocatable classrooms (portables). As required under the GMA, credits have also been applied in the formula to account for State Match Funds to be reimbursed to the District and projected future property taxes to be paid by the dwelling unit. The District's cost per dwelling unit is derived by multiplying the cost per student by the applicable student generation rate per dwelling unit. The student generation rate is the average number of students generated by each housing type; in this case, single family dwellings and multi-family dwellings.Multi-family dwellings were broken out into one-bedroom and tvvo-plus bedroom units. The District has developed its own student generation rate data based on actual permit data from local jurisdictions. See Appendix D. Using the variables and formula described, and applying the 50% discount rate required by the King County School Impact Fee Ordinance, impact fees proposed as a part of this CFP, are summarized in Table 9 below. See also Appendix C. King County and the City of Kent currently have adopted school impact fee ordinances and collect school impact fees on behalf of the District. The District is requesting that the other cities that it serves consider adoption of a school impact fee ordinance. Table 9 School Impact Fees 2017 Housing Type Impact Fee Per Dwelling Unit Single Family $2,290 Multi-Family $3,162 -14- APPENDIXA DISTRICT MAP A-I Olt � r HIGHLINE W YV�„y ^.r........� RIFI ICE AREA MAP 201E-2017 \ say ,� �mdr•+ ." " mYl RIEMENTARY 9C110Mw sw u eeAx 5 b Y w {m .. ODUNDAWS ^" °r^YT ti +irl �� 3rp h i rC rM rS,. ... A HIGHLIHE �� SERVICE AREA MAP 2016-2017 WWIVIC}AN" •cYrwr �Na :,"�'•*"�Y plw g I4 �. C SONDARM8 ""4 M r M v : w.win ^rr .nay as . A-3 POPULATION AND ENROLLMENT DATA B-1 xµ a I I - - --- - - - - - -I � -- - - - - - - - - - - - RIB s LL m X9 is v R R 5i - 5q — L� y� �1 y' ii5 Pr ib La N M m y�:f MI A A� � P � — El §I � M 40 P M M O re .�• c5 O O lD — — C — M M M - — — N � M a tV OI N N N v (7 V M N c4 t6 N tl V. ,il". nj ;4 (9 w �y n ED U APPENDIX C SCHOOL IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS C-1 I IH'IGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT ACT No d01 IMPACT FEE CALCULATION 511412017•DRAFT ,Student Student School Site Acquisition Cost Foci li mast/ :Facility Factor Factor CostiSFR CostUMFR Scope Acreaae Acre Capacity SFR MFR (Elementary Schools $0 0 0.1518 0.0930 $0 $0 Middle Schools 0-0262 0.0465 s0 $0 lligh Schools 0.0654 0.0698 $0 $0 TOTALS $0 $0 Student Student ,School Construction Cost: Facility Facility 7 actor Factor CostISFR CostiMFR Scope %Perm Fac Cost Capacih SFR MFR Elementary Schools 1 site 97.36% $49.050 717 01518 0.0930 $10,110 $6,194 Middle Schools 1 site 97-36% $93 300 950 0,0262 0.0465 $2 249 $3,992 RQh Schools 0.0654 0.0698 $0 $0 TOTALS 12,360 $10,186 Student Student emporarvFacilitiesCost: Facility Facilitv Factor Factor CosVSFR CosVMFR Scope %Perm Fac Cost Capacity SFR MFR Elementary Schools 2-64% 0 0 0.1518 0,0930 $0 $0 Middle Schools 2.64 0 0 00262 00465 $0 $0 Huh Schools 0 0 00654 00698 s0 so FOALS $0 $0 Student Student State Match Credit Calculation: Const.Cost '5Ff State Factor Factor Cos11SFR CostIMFR Scope A11ocabonfSF (Student Match SFR MFR lemenlary Schools 21 l23 90 0.5462 10.1% 0,0930 $1591 $1,792 Middle Schools 213.23 108 0 0.0262 0,0465 $0 s0 I�idh Schools 0 0 0 0 0654 0,0698 s0 $0 OTAL $1.591 $1,792 tax PavInent Credit: CradIUSPR CrediUMFR verade Assessed Value $326 622 $109.319 laoital Bond Interest Rate 3.95% 3.95% l\Iet Present Value ofAvera e Dwelling $2.655,803 $888,886 rearsAmodized t0 t0 Pro art Tax Lev Efate S2.330 $2330 ax ayment re $6.188 0,071 Fee Summary CostISFIR CosUMFR School Site Acquisition Cost $0 $0 School Construction Cost $12.360 $10.186 Temporary Facilities Cost $0 $0 ;State Matchima Credit Calculation $1,591 $1,792 Tax Pavment Credit Calculation $6,188 $2,071 :SUBTOTAL $4,581 $6,323 50%Local Share 12,2910 43,162 CALCULATED IMPACT FEE $3.162 ,2017 IMPACT FEE-DRAFT 31162 C-2 APPENDIX D STUDENT GENERA TIDNRATE DATA D-1 Highline School District Student Generation Rates In 2017, the District developed student generation rates based upon new residential development occurring within the District's boundaries within the preceding five year period.The District compared student enrollment addresses to the addresses on permits for new dwelling units. Future updates to the Capital Facilities Plan will include updated information. Single Family Occupancy Permits for the last 5 years=382 Elementary School Students occupying Single Family Residences= 58 Elementary Students Single Family Student Generation Rate= .1518 Single Family Occupancy Permits for the last 5 years = 382 Junior High School Students occupying Single Family Residences= 10 Junior High School Students Single Family Student Generation Rate=.0262 Single Family Occupancy Permits for the last 5 years =382 High School Students occupying Single Family Residences =25 High School Students Single Family Student Generation Rate= .0654 Multi-Family Occupancy Permits for the last 5 years=43 Elementary School Students occupying Multi-Family Residences=4 Elementary Students Multi-Family Student Generation Rate=.0930 Multi-Family Occupancy Permits for the last 5 years=43 Junior High School Students occupying Multi-Family Residences=2 Junior High School Students Multi-Family Student Generation Rate=.0465 Multi-Family Occupancy Permits for the last 5 years=43 High School Students occupying Multi-Family Residences=3 High School Students Multi-Family Student Generation Rate= .0698 D-2 6 � � �"oF uoorop CL,�•.ao �M ns. � Goo�� •r L`t�_.m c °'�3 ci vo `t 'i`v o.�cv„ E � o -:E v v a U c �a y.o U E m v- o ono V vo � oo cAo V R Via C PE nv ry I '4'' ov� oc vro i, `lug o o' Yvo�3CR vc � o,o Rn O'"�oVvci= Lo`s z`0 "m9Roo m� o.,a w EO� r� scho 0 z-7 E Zo' �c o ac ry yr cvo c- zZV of WW ao v ov � � R o s ry �R Rzz- VU o °'�svc.E o a c E.� 0F0F OG"cR � mE'tv co 0F0F E^v�33m�v> = o d `.E n ctl� cs ,� •' G c'OO v �+ 00 6- --�-' v 00 - 5 o o v°U E o v q❑ e m,,ee q O e't E r o _ co m e s o E e m m c t o v- o o'o CC Lfi o.c �'yF�L 3CComv,� 'i7 ono�F'cps mac.c A'1s]W m V �s.cn >OOU3 .o `E 3..�'OOV3au `� �PN NS ��IY.LYiVrlL aG � � E2' �-5CU3�-o.� Eaoow F" � _d �aV a'❑ v�s" Q i'�"o.g w v cLr. z G`�c �� o d v Z i✓•c o o p.v "a te z o a R� � t y R R s_�`5 s t=r �� €d c G u' ox0' ovc c - ova > o` Ry �o� > Rvvv `o o „ eoV� o ov� RE"'e-. o vanE 9Y vo ry onU.E�� 2 ea sa v � E E 'v S'rv{ oao Ey � H .., a N '> G cmi es ago c G .. o - .>a'n v J_c c_` - �o c •�R�N - v�� L.c=0 o RV- m e.5 o J LRoo2`cv � E q.o v mLH OaU .vi Frto�o `� OoV o o� c�->G oV � oZ.' " Zcov'c- o-� at`oE� ro Rn tocuc � m v v v c � WW£ R7c �_ o WW'S tR E °v' °� WW � c nQRm `° con E.+ v UV ..s °a;s- �� "�zz VV.cm EanR v� o 'c- o�� Em � m n zz oo o£V `�wa zzoo ct � �� EEcoG 9. ccwa Zz� Go,`r nndw E.avm � mo� cSy <e tb�... ooc > e ay. -9GQ oCwoc on�� v Qd a!o YR- oEe � °°c r; � ° orv -[JG ..G� ONC �Z. C._PO rOV NZZ. CO. NC R � ~� titi� R�' nttlV ED � � R ORV CLOT > G _.'VOd 4O� OOC �L > � �ryn OE O .� G O c - o A V vaoc o c- '&o F. 00 � oLF."oC� �CCLo oRo �^'�.o�CCComoz �no�•aC� 3CCC ° m� a"= °��oC > c' RGc v�"vs 00 V3- ttl R_OOU3 E `�.E to � nOCU'�rrvo � NR�°° �i^VSmm o.v a-.= � nocci aucEo.`o�of lzOZU >U -- so . WgqFFz, �Vr mc pp� �'.�,n i''.E vO con �''Eac.v R� ldf 'r�Crr iF„ � m � -ze( 9yo.�u? v U$ c- EN ,'o "2 V UUGCU9 o5E�t,4vcR- .aGn zz ooaci:v ZZoo 6 ! (J zW p4 Yg orn G QQ Ys.- � vo �.E G4'_ on-c' sx mV�FQ o� gzz vc � o O v uCGqqc mi" m -"g' .. GGayna� i.2-"ate .00 ma's nw vrj � �.�y � Z aeCC e � � G�'e 3CCG E onsa „�� G E a Eb e lry ��mo00 oBamv�V� PammOOV 3V� RnU� �`�d �OOCoi'3V�ooaC J ; :. !!] ,° "q:a wX t Y N O bq ro tQ CZS ❑ N O ro � ° N ❑ ro V] � C ,� O N b❑A cd — U ro � 3 � C ❑ s❑. ., a, w U�7 N aro OW h a17 h � .0 ❑.� U N ai HO ❑ ro ❑ ❑ P o bo on �r ° CL Mo � � .b � in � p .ro •C � �j w � /�� >•.' � G N w A c L n in.o 71 al `;qtQ • o ro y � W ❑ � � ro a w ❑ o ❑ o a3 -E o G+ F� Q' ro bq ❑,' U 'Zw H .�. sOi '3 aar-➢C15 U"" U