Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
City Council Meeting - Council - Agenda - 11/02/2010
CITY OF KENT F . City Council Meeting 14 W A enda 1 - . 1 November 2, 2010 1 F Mayor Suzette Cooke Jamie Perry,Council President { 1 � 1 > J Councilmembers Elizabeth Albertson 1 Ron Harmon 1 Dennis Higgins +' Deborah Ranniger 1 Debbie Raplee KENT WASHIMGTON _ S9SS•. �y, Les Thomas CITY CLERK aa«waoi3s KENT CITY COUNCIL AGENDAS KENT November 2, 2010 Wns H�NGTUN Council Chambers MAYOR: Suzette Cooke COUNCILMEMBERS: Jamie Perry, President Elizabeth Albertson Ron Harmon Dennis Higgins Deborah Ranniger Debbie Raplee Les Thomas ********************************************************************** COUNCIL WORKSHOP CANCELLED ********************************************************************** COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA 5.00 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE 2. ROLL CALL 3. CHANGES TO AGENDA A. FROM COUNCIL, ADMINISTRATION, OR STAFF B. FROM THE PUBLIC - Citizens may request that an item be added to the agenda at this time. Please stand or raise your hand to be recognized by the Mayor. 4. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS A. Public Recognition B. Community Events 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. 2011 Annual Budget (2"d Hearing) B. 2011-2016 Capital Improvement Plan and Comprehensive Plan Amendments (2"d Hearing) C. Kent Comprehensive Plan and Amendments to Kent City Code Section 12.13, School Impact Fees D. 2010 Tax Levy for 2011 Budget 6. PUBLIC COMMENT 7. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Minutes of Previous Meeting - Approve B. Payment of Bills - None C. 4Culture Sustained Support Grant - Accept D. 2011 Washington State Arts Commission Organizational Support Grant - Accept E. 2011 Community Development Block Grant Action Plan - Approve F. Recreation and Conservation Office Agreement Amendment for Matinjussi/Van Dyke Property Acquisitions - Authorize G. Consultant Agreement with Northwest Hydraulic Consultants for Foster Park and Horseshoe Bend Levee Improvements - Authorize (Continued) COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA CONTINUED H. Consultant Agreement with GeoEngineers for Foster Park and Horseshoe Bend Levee Improvements - Authorize I. Farm House Bill of Sale - Accept 8. OTHER BUSINESS None 9. BIDS None 10. REPORTS FROM STANDING COMMITTEES, STAFF AND SPECIAL COMMITTEES 11. EXECUTIVE SESSION AND ACTION AFTER EXECUTIVE SESSION L None 12. ADJOURNMENT 1 NOTE: A copy of the full agenda packet is available for perusal in the City Clerk's Office and the Kent Regional Library. The Agenda Summary page and complete packet are on the City of Kent web site at www.choosekent.com An explanation of the agenda format is given on the back of this page. j Any person requiring a disability accommodation should contact the City Clerk's Office in advance at (253) 856-5725. For TDD relay service call the Washington Telecommunications Relay Service at 1-800-833-6388. y y V a y O N N d t u N rs 0 •.F- Q.O T T>w° v iC0 vE.00 o � �v >-2o - 3 °o gN H y Q C tl C m 'D O N— R1>- M N c0 N U` Y O C V N?i 41 Y T]L c=— a C C'Q •t`n C U t6 0 V T O y L 70 p E N _C �" L E CL.. h V U N m 3 O O H n U oLQc ° O'o .tvuDc0 ax rsau >n' t � Ev0MCY= - o� N v .. � No vE °p. w Uy° roca� rs � ._ h,vvE � m ��y=� oo� cn CU�'�v rs E-o ro A u o = rs o c `0 c v v c0 coo °' m v b cv N v v a n.... r-0ai E v 3 E ... v ro i n L v-c 0 3-0 o E 3 o E E uu M-0 o M E c wm ak 0 c = �Qm roi k um n. mE >.- uuu �2 UE w v N v d 3 0 no - ° ,� W v ob ... by— vc W 0 E °c' m E v fl cEv O o a V o O L u u E �oE> o—v j vmE ` -c-aOy c E Uov Uo oL u v o i UE u o Eon aai v�m ocu C) em ? a�s p� W vL(yrV cm mpv .a E cc� c rsF- v °1U~ �aE �O� ;a = -n occC o _ N O vrsi N L OU ��' C J T m aci '^ c (-•� Y co�� n � 3m �cov .' a�ivn � a EJ9 AavoU-o ucovo� ce w Y > c v v c=..c E '�' v 0 0 1] u C V ;y G F, ai n E'c w O f Fy2Sro0 C 'L E E NE ; � -- � C)QrsO ' rsC 0.V C E v V E 2,3 o rVU�oE� v U U 005i0,u, n.�C10 artc° cS.M..'c- n , i ai Fw o • u E 0 _ > W= c 3 • roEE c ¢ m ° V1 U 0 c V N , z m wp rom �oTO Q O ro E w 0 7 W Y V C�? Cc) C O C T _ O _ c0 ✓>>O; rs C C in C T O V V>li r-N YY roo7< uLJ G d W N ic pp n- O C N j L v C o c 0 `p L n O O N N a00u N V C o °. E c �¢ v pu M ECd co • O D U CL.. O d TCm E - O 'O J C p C~ rJ n1 v O o �O^ Sro u _ .• � pUpL � m �+ � m N a o" y y v v N o E E on uo a 3 ° v n E Yc�i '6 :.x ocn y o u N p_E o.�'' , n: 0u =s'� u '= a;i n vO m v i o cc o u rs ¢U> n E E COUNCIL WORKSHOP i t t t I� I CHANGES TO THE AGENDA Citizens wishing to address the Council will, at this time, make known the subject of interest, so all may be properly heard. A) FROM COUNCIL, ADMINISTRATION, OR STAFF B) FROM THE PUBLIC PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS A) PUBLIC RECOGNITION B) COMMUNITY EVENTS i t 1 Kent City Council Meeting Date November 2, 2010 Category Public Hearings - 5A 1. SUB3ECT: 2011 ANNUAL BUDGET (2 ND HEARING) 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: This date has been set for the second public hearing on the 2011 Annual Budget. Public input is welcome. 3. EXHIBITS: None 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Finance Director (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? N/A Revenue? N/A Currently in the Budget? Yes _ No 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: A. Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds to close the public hearing. B. Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: 1 t Kent City Council Meeting Date November 2, 2010 Category Public Hearings - 5B 1. SUB3ECT: 2011-2016 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS (2 ND HEARING) 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: This date has been set for the second public hearing on the 2011-2016 Capital Improvement Plan and Comprehensive Plan Amendments. Public input is welcome. 3. EXHIBITS: 2011-2016 Capital Improvement Plan Report, Addendum to the Kent Comprehensive Plan Environmental Impact Statement and Adoption of existing Environmental documents 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Finance Director (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? N/A Revenue? N/A Currently in the Budget? Yes _ No 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: A. Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds to close the public hearing. B. Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: General Government 2011 - 2016 Capital Improvement Program Amounts in Thousands Total 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Sources of Funds CIP Revenues 7,104 1,489 1,245 1,170 1,100 1,050 1,050 Facilities Revenues (Internal) 4,290 430 715 725 790 1,040 590 King County Grant (CPPW) 45 39 6 LTGO Bonds 2,468 2,468 Total Sources of Funds 13,907 4,426 1,966 1,895 1,890 2,090 1,640 Proiects Funded Facilities Centennial Center Upgrades 140 0 45 45 50 Emergency Facility Repairs (Lifecycle) 850 100 150 150 150 150 150 Facilities Card Access 150 0 75 75 Floor Covering Replacements (Lifecycle) 690 40 150 250 200 50 HVAC Lifecycle Replacements (Lifecycle) 1,800 300 300 300 300 300 300 Kent Pool Improvements 25 25 Kitchen Equipment (Lifecycle) 125 25 25 25 25 25 Parks Maintenance Renovation 35 35 Roof Repairs (Lifecycle) 705 330 75 300 Sealcoat Parking Lots (Lifecycle) 420 125 100 65 65 65 Senior Center Upgrades 40 40 Technology 0 Hardware Lifecycle Replacements 3,139 639 500 500 500 S00 500 Software Business System Replacements 3,000 500 500 500 500 500 500 Tech Plan 2008 - 2012 21468 2,468 Other General Government 0 Communities Putting Prevention To Work (CPPW) 45 39 6 Neighborhood Matching Grant Funds 275 25 50 50 50 50 50 Total Projects Funded 13,907 4,426 1,966 1,895 1,890 2,090 1,640 Public Safety 2011 - 2016 Capital Improvement Program Amounts in Thousands Total 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 7 Sources of Funds CIP Revenues 10,555 195 1,295 8,280 245 345 195 Total Sources of Funds 10,555 195 1,295 8,280 245 345 195 Proiects Funded Technology Public Safety MDC Replacements 1,170 195 195 195 195 195 195 Police Services AR-15 Rifles 75 75 Crime Scene Van Replcmnt/Equip Upgrd 75 75 Ergonomic Work Stations 90 90 Pursuit Intervention Technique Equip 25 25 Robotic Laser Scanning Total Station 50 50 Satellite Processing of Traffic NOIs 170 100 70 Police /Fire Training Center Annex Furniture Upgrades 25 25 Citywide Driving Simulator 150 150 Expansion Police/Fire Training Center 8,640 750 7,890 Training Center Classroom Upgrades 25 25 Other Public Safety Work Crew Van/Trailer Equipment 60 60 Total Projects Funded 10,555 195 1,295 8,280 245 345 195 1 i Transportation 2011 - 2016 Capital Improvement Program Amounts in Thousands Total 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Sources of Funds General Fund Revenues 6,600 800 800 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 Total Sources of Funds 6,600 800 800 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 Proiects Funded Other Transportation Sidewalk Rehabilitation and Installation 2,600 300 300 500 500 500 500 Miscellaneous Asphalt Overlays 4,000 500 500 750 750 750 750 Total Projects Funded 6,600 800 800 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1 ! Parks, Rec & Comm Services 2011 - 2016 Capital Improvement Program Amounts in Thousands Total 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Sources of Funds CIP REET2 Revenues 21,805 865 3,985 5,650 4,950 4,230 2,125 CIP Revenues 2,175 25 500 500 550 300 300 Donations / Contributions 90 15 15 15 15 15 15 King County Grant 760 170 175 180 235 Other Grant 1,155 80 555 5 505 5 5 Source To Be Determined 3,679 105 105 125 3,205 130 9 WA State Grant 8,250 1,000 2,450 2,000 2,300 500 Total Sources of Funds 37,914 1,260 6,335 8,925 11,460 6,980 2,954 Proiects Funded 132nd Street Park Development 2,100 100 1,700 300 Adopt-A-Park Volunteer Program 240 40 40 40 40 40 40 Architect/Engineering 50 10 10 10 10 10 Briscoe Park Renovation 150 150 Clark Lake Development 1,050 50 1,000 Clark Lake Land Acquisition 2,000 1,000 1,000 Community Parks Reinvestment Prgrm 600 100 100 100 100 100 100 Community Sports Fields 7,600 100 3,300 200 4,000 Downtown Gateways, Phase 2 750 0 150 150 150 150 150 Eagle Creek Park Development 1,000 1,000 Eagle Scout Volunteer Program 210 35 35 35 35 35 35 East Hill Park Land Acquisition 700 200 500 Eastridge Park Renovation 100 100 Event Center Lifecycle 1,800 300 300 300 300 300 300 Garrison Creek Renovation 750 750 Grant Matching Funds/Land Acq. 375 0 75 75 75 75 75 Green Tree Park Renovation 100 100 House Demolition 25 25 Huse Property Development 1,150 50 100 1,000 International Parks Acq /Development 50 50 Kent Memorial Park Renovation 200 200 Kent Parks Foundation 150 25 25 25 25 25 25 Kiwanis Tot Lot #3 Renovation 75 75 Lake Fenwick Park Renovation 1,200 0 1,200 Lake Meridian Park Ren & Master Plan 3,200 0 1,200 2,000 Life Cycle - Trails 54 9 9 9 9 9 9 Life Cycle Park System 1,730 346 346 346 346 346 Major Entries into Kent 250 0 50 50 50 50 50 Master Plans 150 25 25 25 25 25 25 Meridian Glen Renovation 50 50 Parks, Rec & Comm Services 2011 - 2016 Capital Improvement Program Amounts in Thousands Mill Creek/Greenway Plan & Renovation 725 75 50 250 350 North Meridian Park Renovation 200 200 Old Fishing Hole Renovation 150 150 Panther Lake PAA Park Acquisition 400 400 Park and Open Space Plan 25 25 Pine Tree Park Renovation 50 50 Regional Trails - Levy Program 710 170 175 180 185 Rrverwalk/Riverview Park Development 130 130 Russell Road Playground 200 200 S 272nd St Neighborhood Park Dev 100 100 Salt Air Vista Park Renovation 50 50 Scenic Hill Park Renovation 350 350 Sprmgwood Park Improvements 2,100 100 2,000 Urban Forestry Program/Green Kent 60 10 10 10 10 10 10 Valley Fir Athletic Complex Acq & Dev 500 500 Van Doren's Park Improvements 300 150 150 West Fenwick Park Renovation 1,585 85 1,500 West Hill Park Development 1,920 100 1,820 Wilson Playfields Acq/Renovation 500 500 Total Projects Funded 37,914 1,260 6,335 8,925 11,460 6,980 2,954 Utilities 2011 - 2016 Capital Improvement Program Amounts in Thousands Total 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Sources of Funds Water Revenues 39,571 3,345 8,425 4,930 7,285 7,790 7,796 Sewer Revenues 4,100 1,600 500 500 500 500 500 Drainage Revenues 57,010 7,005 7,835 9,465 11,725 9,935 11,045 Source To Be Determined 3,000 750 750 750 750 Total Sources of Funds 103,681 11,950 17,510 15,645 20,260 18,975 19,341 Proiects Funded Stormwater Management NPDES 1,540 240 240 250 260 270 280 Miscellaneous Drainage Improvement 1,590 265 265 265 265 265 265 Drainage Infrastructure Replacements 15,600 1,500 2,000 2,500 2,900 3,200 3,500 Lake Fenwick 500 500 Miscellaneous Habitat Improvements 1,080 530 550 Green River Levee Repair 17,000 2,500 2,500 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 Upper Mill Creek Dam Improvements 2,500 2,500 South 228th Drainage Bypass 3,200 800 2,400 Mill Creek Pump Station 1,000 1,000 Mill Creek @ James Flood Protection 4,800 500 4,300 Green River Natural Resource Center 3,200 1,000 2,200 Central Avenue Storm Drainage 5,000 1,000 4,000 Sanitary Sewer Miscellaneous Sewer Replacements 4,100 1,600 500 500 500 500 500 Water Supply & Distribution Miscellaneous Water Improvements 8,750 1,750 1,750 1,750 1,750 1,750 Tacoma Pipeline 7,300 650 650 2,000 2,000 2,000 , Guiberson Reservoir Replacement 7,345 3,345 4,000 Kent Springs Transmission Main Repair 0 Meeker Street Pump Station 0 Seismic Improvements 500 100 100 100 100 100 Large Meter &Vault Replacement 476 85 90 95 100 106 Easements/Land Acquisitions 10,500 1,500 2,000 2,000 2,500 2,500 Rock Creek Mitigation Projects 1,500 300 300 300 300 300 Security Improvements 50 10 10 10 10 10 Hydrant Replacement Program 150 30 30 30 30 30 Automated Meter Reading 3,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 East Hill Maintenance Facility 3,000 750 750 750 750 Total Projects Funded 103,681 11,950 17,510 15,645 20,260 18,975 19,341 2011 - 2016 Capital Improvement Program Sources of Funding Amounts in O00's Other Sources Grants 5% Capital General Fund Improvement Fund Facilities Fowd o 24% "AA - _ IBM Utility Funds 58% Total 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Sources of Funds Capital Improvement Fund 41,639 2,574 7,025 15,600 6,845 5,925 3,670 Utility Funds 100,681 11,950 16,760 14,895 19,510 18,225 19,341 Facilities Fund 4,290 430 715 725 790 1,040 590 General Fund 6,600 800 800 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 Grants 10,210 289 1,736 2,635 2,740 2,305 505 Other Sources 9,237 2,588 870 890 3,970 895 24 Total Sources of Funds 172,657 18,631 27,906 35,995 35,105 29,640 25,380 i 2011 - 2016 Capital Improvement Program Projects Forecast Amounts in 000's General Transportation Government 4% 8% Public Safety 6% Parks, Rec&Comm Services Utilities 22% 60% Total 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Proiects General Government 13,907 4,426 1,966 1,895 1,890 2,090 1,640 Public Safety 10,555 195 1,295 8,280 245 345 195 Transportation 6,600 800 800 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 Parks, Rec & Comm Services 37,914 1,260 6,335 8,925 11,460 6,980 2,954 Utilities 103,681 11,950 17,510 15,645 20,260 18,975 19,341 Total Projects 172,657 18,631 27,906 35,995 35,105 29,640 25,380 j I ECONOMIC and COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Ben Wolters, Director PLANNING SERVICES Fred N. Satterstrom, AICP, Planning Director ' ® Charlene Anderson, AICP, Manager KEN T Phone: 253-856-5454 WASHINGTON Fax: 253-856-6454 Address: 220 Fourth Avenue S Kent, WA 98032-5895 CITY OF KENT ADDENDUM TO THE KENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Responsible Official: Charlene Anderson SCOPE The City of Kent has completed environmental analysis, pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), for an amendment of the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan to include the City's 2011-2016 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). This amendment to the Capital Facilities Element is occurring concurrently with the adoption of the City's 2011 operating budget as provided by RCW 36.70A.130. The GMA requires cities and counties to approve and maintain a six (6) year capital facilities plan which includes requirements for specific types of capital facilities, measurable levels-of-service (LOS) standards, financial feasibility, and assurance that adequate facilities are provided as population and employment growth occurs. Kent's annual budget document and six-year CIP fulfill the GMA requirement for facilities planning. In addition, these documents serve as a foundation for the city's fiscal management and eligibility for grants and loans. The CIP and annual budget, along with the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan provide coordination among the city's many plans for capital improvements. The annual budget and six-year CIP contain broad goals and specific financial policies that guide and implement the provisions for adequate public services and facilities. The six-year CIP is a funding mechanism to implement projects and programs identified in the City's Comprehensive Plan. Specifically, the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan contains goals and policies related to the provision and maintenance of public services and capital facilities which are necessary to support the projected growth over the next twenty (20) years. The goals and policies of the Capital Facilities Element are consistent with the Land Use, Transportation and Parks and Open Space Elements. The Comprehensive Plan EIS, draft and final, evaluated the growth potential as identified in the City's Comprehensive Plan. The adoption of the six-year CIP concurrently with the city's annual budget is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan EIS - Addendum Capital Improvement Program 2011-2016 Comprehensive Plan EIS analysis as the types of projects and programs identified in the CIP are specifically related to the growth projections in the Comprehensive Plan and EIS. SEPA COMPLIANCE In October 1993, the City of Kent issued a Determination of Significance (DS) and Notice of Scoping for the Comprehensive Plan (ENV-93-51). After a series of public meetings, a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) was issued on July 18, 1994 for the Draft Comprehensive Plan, issued on the same date. The DEIS was distributed to City Council and Planning Commission members, adjacent jurisdictions, affected agencies and other parties of interest. After comments on the DEIS were solicited and reviewed, a Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) was issued and distributed on January 30, 1995. This Addendum to the Kent Comprehensive Plan EIS evaluates the adoption of the six-year CIP. No additional impacts are identified since the CIP implements projects and programs identified and evaluated in the City's Comprehensive Plan and Comprehensive Plan EIS. STATEMENT OF CONSISTENCY Future projects associated with the CIP will be subject to and shall be consistent with the following: City of Kent Comprehensive Plan, the Kent City Code, International Fire Code, International Building Code, Public Works Standards and all other applicable laws and ordinances in effect at the time a complete project permit application is filed. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW - BACKGROUND i The City of Kent has followed the process of phased environmental review as it undertakes actions to implement the Comprehensive Plan. The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and rules established for the act, WAC 197- 11, outline procedures for the use of existing environmental documents and preparing addenda to environmental decisions. Nonproject Documents - An EIS prepared for a comprehensive plan, development regulation, or other broad based policy documents are considered "non-project," or programmatic in nature (see WAC 197-11-704). These are distinguished from EISs or environmental documents prepared for specific project actions, such as a building permit or a road construction project. The purpose of a non-project EIS is to analyze proposed alternatives and to provide environmental consideration and mitigation prior to adoption of an alternative. It is also a document that discloses the process used in evaluating alternatives to decision-makers and citizens. Phased Review - SEPA rules allow environmental review to be phased so that review coincides with meaningful points in the planning and decision making process, (WAC 197-11-060(5)). Broader environmental documents may be followed by narrower documents that incorporate general discussion by reference and concentrate solely on issues specific to that proposal. SEPA Page 2 of 4 Comprehensive Plan EIS - Addendum Capital Improvement Program 2011-2016 rules also clearly state that agencies shall use a variety of mechanisms, including addenda, adoption and incorporation by reference, to avoid duplication and excess paperwork. Future projects identified and associated with the implementation of the Capital Improvement Program may require individual and separate environmental review, pursuant to SEPA. Such review will occur when a specific project Is identified. Prior Environmental Documents - The City of Kent issued a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for the Comprehensive Plan on July 18, 1994 (#ENV-93-51). The DEIS analyzed three comprehensive plan land use alternatives, and recommended mitigation measures, which were used in preparing comprehensive plan policies. The preferred land use alternative which was incorporated into the Comprehensive Plan was most closely related to Alternative 2 of the DEIS, (the mixed-use alternative). A Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) was issued on January 30, 1995, and the Comprehensive Plan was adopted by the City Council on April 18, 1995. Scope of Addendum - As outlined in the SEPA rules, the purpose of an addendum is to provide environmental analysis with respect to the described actions. This analysis builds upon the Comprehensive Plan EIS but does not substantially change the identified impacts and analysis; therefore it is prudent to utilize the addendum process as outlined in WAC-197-11- 600(4)(c). ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS All environmental elements were adequately addressed within the parameters of the City of Kent Comprehensive Plan EIS, draft and final. Further, subsequent "project" actions would require the submittal of separate environmental checklists, pursuant to SEPA, which will be analyzed for consistency with the original mitigating conditions and may require new mitigation based upon site-specific conditions. The adoption of the six-year CIP implements goals and policies identified in the City's Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan. Specifically, the CIP implements the following: Goal CF-1 - As the City of Kent continues to grow and develop, ensure that an adequate supply and range of public services and capital facilities are available to provide satisfactory standards of public health, safety, and quality of life. Policy CF1.2 - Ensure that public services and capital facilities needs are addressed In updates to the Capital Facilities Plans and Capital Improvement Programs, and development regulations as appropriate. Goal CF-4 - Ensure that appropriate funding sources are available to acquire or bond for the provision of needed public services and facilities. ' Page 3 of 4 Comprehensive Plan EIS - Addendum Capital Improvement Program 2011-2016 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY Kent City Code section 11.03.510 identifies plans and policies from which the City may draw substantive mitigation under the State Environmental Policy Act. This nonproject action has been evaluated in light of those substantive plans and policies as well as within the overall analysis completed for the City's Comprehensive Plan EIS. DECISION The City of Kent Comprehensive Plan EIS, draft and final, provided analysis with regard to the implementation of the Comprehensive Plan elements, goals and policies. This includes the Implementation of the Capital Facilities Element and Capital Improvement Programs. The City has reviewed the 2011-2016 CIP and has found it to be consistent with the range, types and magnitude of impacts and corresponding mitigation outlined in the Comprehensive Plan EIS. The adoption of the six-year CIP does not substantially change any identified related Impacts in the Comprehensive Plan EIS. This analysis and subsequent addendum did not identify any new significant impacts associated with the adoption of the 2011-2016 CIP. Therefore, this addendum, combined with the Comprehensive Plan EIS adequately evaluates potential adverse environmental impacts and provides appropriate mitigation for this nonproject action. Based upon this analysis, a separate threshold determination is not required. This document and corresponding environmental record may be utilized in the future in conjunction with environmental review for future projects identified In the CIP in accordance with the guidelines provided by WAC 197-11. Dated: October 22, 2010 Signature: _ 1 a ,r7 ' arlene Anderson, AICP, Responsible Official CA:Jm\\5:\Permit\Plan\Env\2010\CIPaddendum2011-2016.doc Page 4 of 4 t KE4T W.SHINOiO- ADOPTION OF EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS Adoption Document(s): EIS Description of current proposal: The action proposed by the City consists of the adoption of an updated Capital Improvement Program concurrent with the 2011 city operating budget. The Capital Improvement Plan is an element of the City's Comprehensive Plan. Proponent: City of Kent Location of proposal: The proposal is a city-wide action. Title of document(s) being adopted: City of Kent Comprehensive Plan Environmental Impact Statement Draft (July 1994) and Final (January 1995) - Prepared by the City of Kent. Description of document (or portion) being adopted: The City of Kent Comprehensive Plan EIS is being adopted in total. This document evaluated three different land use alternatives for the city. The analysis evaluated the type and range of impacts to the environment associated with each land use alternative and associated development regulations. If the document has been challenged (WAC 197-11-630) please describe: The document was not challenged. Document availability: This document is available for review at the City of Kent Planning Services office, 400 West Gowe, Kent, WA 98032 from 8:00 am to 5:00 pm. We have identified and adopted this document as being appropriate for this proposal after independent review. Along with the addendum, this document meets our environmental review needs for the current proposal and will accompany the proposal to the decisionmaker(s). Name of agency adopting the document: City of Kent Contact person/Responsible Official: Charlene Anderson, AICP (253) 856-5431 Planning Manager City of Kent Community Development Dept. 220 Fourth Ave South Kent, WA 98032 Date: October 22, 2010 Signature: �ViG�ff� S:\Permit\Plan\Env\2010\CIPadopt2011-2016.doc G k(C Vkxa A/wu szol, Kent City Council Meeting Date November 2, 2010 Category Public Hearings — 5C 1. SUBJECT: KENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND AMENDMENTS TO KENT CITY CODE SECTION 12.13, SCHOOL IMPACT FEES 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: This public hearing will consider amendment of the Capital Facilities element of the Kent Comprehensive Plan to incorporate the updated Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent, Federal Way and Auburn School Districts. These plans also propose to amend school impact fees outlined in Kent City Code Chapter 12.13. Kent City Code requires the School Districts to submit Atheir updated Plans annually for Council review and consideration. 3. EXHIBITS: Staff memo dated 10/26/10 w/attachments; Kent, Federal Way, and Auburn School Districts' Capital Facilities Plans & Determinations of Non- significance and Environmental Checklists 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Staff (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? No Revenue? No Currently in the Budget? Yes No 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: A. Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds ' to close the public hearing. B. Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Fred N. Satterstrom, AICP, Director PLANNING SERVICES Charlene Anderson, AICP, Manager KENT W A H I N G T 0 N Phone 253-856-5454 Fax- 253-856-6454 Address: 220 Fourth Avenue S Kent, WA 98032-5895 October 26, 2010 To: Mayor Suzette Cooke, Council President Jamie Perry and City Council Members (� From: Charlene Anderson, AICP, Planning Manager i Subject: Kent Comprehensive Plan and Kent City Code Chapter 12.13 Amendments, School District Capital Facilities Plans-Impact Fees MOTION: None at this time. This issue will be decided concurrently with adoption of the 2011 Annual Budget and 2011-16 Capital Improvement Program. SUMMARY: This public hearing will consider amendment of the Capital Facilities Element of the Kent Comprehensive Plan to incorporate the updated Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent, Federal Way and Auburn School Districts. These plans propose to also amend school impact fees outlined in Kent City Code Chapter 12.13. Kent City Code requires the School Districts to submit their updated Plans annually for Council review and consideration. The City Council holds the public hearing on the school district plans at the same time as the public hearing for the budget, i.e., November 21 2010. The City of Kent 6-year Capital Improvement Program being considered this evening also will update the Capital Facilities Element of the Kent Comprehensive Plan. BUDGET IMPACT: None BACKGROUND: One of the planning goals under the Growth Management Act (RCW 36.70A.020) is to ensure that those public facilities and services necessary to support development are adequate and timely to serve the development without decreasing current service levels below minimum standards. The Act (RCW 36.70A.070) requires the Capital Facilities Element of the Kent Comprehensive Plan to inventory existing capital facilities, forecast future needs and provide for financing of those facilities. RCW 82.02.050 authorizes cities planning under the Growth Management Act to impose impact fees on development activity as part of the financing for public facilities needed to serve new growth and development. As a result, KCC 12.13.080 and 090 provide for imposition of school impact fees on behalf of any school district which provides to the City a capital facilities plan; the plan is adopted by reference as part of the Capital Facilities Element of the Kent Comprehensive Plan. The school districts are required to submit for annual Council review their updated capital facilities plans (KCC 12.13.060 & 070). The Kent, Federal Way and Auburn School Districts submitted their 2010/11 - 2015/16 Capital Facilities Plans and are requesting amendments of the Kent Comprehensive Plan and Kent City Code Chapter 12.13 to reflect changes to impact fees resulting from new student population generated by new single family and multifamily residential development. The updated plans include an inventory of existing facilities, existing facility needs, expected future facility requirements, expected funding, and calculation of the impact fees according to the formula set forth in KCC 12.13.140. The Kent School District proposes to increase their existing school impact fees for single family units from $5,394 to $5,486 (an increase of $92 or 1.7%) and for multifamily units from $3,322 to $3,378 (an increase of $56 or 1.7%). The Federal Way School District proposes to increase their existing school impact fees for single family units from $3,832 to $4,014 (an Increase of $182 or 4.7%) and Increase their fees for multifamily units from $2,114 to $2,172 (an Increase of , $58 or 2.7%). The Auburn School District proposes to decrease their existing school Impact fees for single family units from $5,432.70 to $5,266.33 (a decrease of $166.37 or 3.1%) and increase their fees for multifamily units from $1,184.71 to $1,518.22 (an increase of $333.51 or 28.2%). The only area In Kent where Auburn School District's Impact fees are applied Is the Verdana or Bridges PUD on the former Impoundment reservoir site. Included with this memo are comparison tables among the three school districts as well as historical data on the school Impact fees. CA\pm S\Permrt\Plan\COMP_PLAN_AMENDMENTS\2010\CPA-2010-1 SchlDistsCFPSUpdate\CityCounal\CPA-2010-1_capfacdities110210 doc ' Eric School Districts'Capital Facilities Plans Determinations of Nonsignificance Environmental Checklists RCW 36 70A 020&070,RCW 62 02 050 KCC 12 13 060-090,KCC 12 13 140 Comparison Tables and Historical Data cc Ben Wolters,Economic&Community Development Director Fred N Satterstrom,AICP,Planning Director Charlene Anderson,AICP, Planning Manager Project File Parties of Record i i i Kent Comprehensive Plan and Kent City Code Chapter 12 13 Amendments, School District Capital Facilities Plans-Impact Fees 1 V02110 City Council Meeting Page 2 of 2 R7 I Kent Schoolz: 15111C k PM181: acill 5 Pilo 77 I �{ ry n9 tYY+X icy" New Panther Lake Elementary School opened in Fall 2009 Kent Schoof District No. 415 provides educationa(service to IXesidents of`lJnincorporated Ying County and 1Xesidents of the Cities of Kent, Covington, Auburn, 12enton BCackDiamond Mapfe va(fey, andSeaTac, Washington `' Apri( 2010 ■ ■ School SEEM C1 Ke n- 11 2010 — 201 1 - 2015 — 2016 CBP H81 w� ■, i 'e,,ob planz 14 1 L� 4 New Panther Lake Elementary School opened in Fall 2009 Kent SchooCDistrict No. 415 provides educationarservice to Residents of Vnincorporated ping County and Residents of the Cities of ?dent, Covington, 4u6urn, Renton BCackOiamond, 9lap(e vaffey, andSeaTac, Washington .Aprif 2010 K of S C e 'is rl Kent School District No 415 12033 SE 2561h Street Kent, Washington 98030-6643 (253) 373-7295 SIX - YEAR CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2010 - 2011 2015 - 2016 IKEIIT' ' BOARD of DIRECTORS Debbie Straus Bill Boyce Jim Berrios Tim Clark Karen DeBruler ADMINISTRATION Edward Lee Vargas, Ed.D. — Superintendent Fred H High — Assistant Superintendent for Business Services John Knutson — Executive Director for Finance Mend Rieger, Ed D — Assistant Superintendent, Learning & School Improvement Larry Miner — Assistant Superintendent for Human Resources Linda Del Giudice — Chief Accountability Officer Thuan Nguyen — Chief Information Officer Janis Bechtel — Executive Director, School Improvement, Grades 7 — 12 Jeanette Ristau — Executive Director, School Improvement, Grades K — 6 David Staight — Executive Director, School Improvement, Grades K — 6 Laura Madeo — Executive Director for Instructional Services Becky Hanks — Executive Director for Community Connections Charles Lind — Executive Director, Labor Relations & Legal Services 1 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2010 I e an, SChool, DIS, IKENT 1 'mot i 1t3� SIX - YEAR CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2010 - 2011 2015 - 2016 April 2010 ' For information on the Plan, please call the Finance & Planning Department at (253) 373-7295 Capital Facilities Plan Contributing Staff Gwenn Escher-Derdowski Enrollment & Planning Administrator Fred Long, Supervisor of Facilities& Construction Karla Wilkerson, Facilities Department Don Walkup, Supervisor of Transportation Department Kathy Fostord, Transportation Manager Maps by Jana Tucker, Printing Services Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2010 Kent:: SChOO1 DIS111CIS SiX Tear CapitafTacifities Pran ' 7a6fe of Contents tSection Page Number I Executive Summary 2 ' 11 Six-Year Enrollment Projection & History 4 III District Standard of Service 9 I V Inventory, Capacity & Maps of Existing Schools 12 ' V Six-Year Planning and Construction Plan 15 ' V I Relocatable Classrooms 18 V I I Projected Classroom Capacity 19 ' V I I I Finance Plan, Cost Basis and Impact Fee Schedules 24 ' I X Summary of Changes to Previous Plan 31 X Appendixes 32 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2010 I Executive Summary This Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") has been prepared by the Kent School District (the "District") as the organization's facilities planning document, ' in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act, King County Code K.C.C. 21A.43 and Cities of Kent, Covington, Auburn, Renton, Black Diamond, Maple Valley, and SeaTac. This annual Plan update was , prepared using data available in the spring of 2010 for the 2009-2010 school year. This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the Kent School District. This Plan is not intended to be the sole planning document for all of the District's needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic Long Range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board Policies, taking into account a longer or shorter time period, other factors and trends in the use of facilities, and other needs of the District as may be required. , Prior Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent School District have been adopted by Metropolitan King County Council and Cities of Kent, Covington, Auburn and ' Renton and included in the Capital Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. The first ordinance implementing impact fees for the unincorporated areas of Kent School District was effective September 15, 1993 ' In order for impact fees to be collected in the unincorporated areas of Kent ' School District, the Metropolitan King County Council must adopt this Plan and a fee-implementing ordinance for the District. For impact fees to be collected in the incorporated portions of the District, the cities of Kent, Covington, Auburn and , Renton must also adopt this Plan and their own school impact fee ordinances. This Plan has also been submitted to cities of Black Diamond, Maple Valley, and SeaTac. ' This Capital Facilities Plan establishes a standard of service in order to ascertain current and future capacity. While the State Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines do not account for local program needs in the District The Growth Management Act, King County and City codes and ordinances authorize the District to make ' adjustments to the standard of service based on specific needs for students of the District. This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. , Program capacity Is based on an average capacity and updated to reflect changes to special programs served In each building. Relocatables in the ' capacity calculation use the same standard of service as the permanent facilities (continued) , Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2010 Page 2 ' I Executive Summary (continued) ' The capacity of each school in the District is calculated based on the District standard of service and the existing inventory, which includes some relocatable classrooms. The District's program capacity of permanent facilities reflects ' program changes and the reduction of class size to meet the standard of service for Kent School District. Relocatables provide additional transitional capacity until permanent facilities are completed Kent School District is the fourth largest district in the state. Enrollment is electronically reported monthly to the Office of the Superintendent of Public ' Instruction (OSPI) on Form P-223. Although funding apportionment is based on Annual Average Full Time Equivalent (AAFTE), Enrollment on October 1 is a widely recognized "snapshot in time" that is used to report the District's ' enrollment for the year. P-223 Headcount for October 1, 2009 was 26,764. P-223 FTE (Full Time Equivalent) enrollment was 25,777 90 (FTE reports Kindergarten at 5 and excludes Early Childhood Education [ECE] and college-only Running Start students ) The actual number of individual students per the October 2009 full head count was 27,567. (Full Headcount reports all enrolled students at 1.0 including Kindergarten, ECE and college-only Running Start students ) The District's standard of service, enrollment history and projections, and use of transitional facilities are reviewed in detail in various sections of this Plan The District plans to continue to satisfy concurrency requirements through the ' transitional use of relocatables. A financing plan is included in Section V I I I which demonstrates the District's ability to implement this Plan Pursuant to the requirements of the Growth Management Act, this Plan will be updated annually with changes in the fee schedules adjusted accordingly. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2010 Page 3 I I Six - Year Enrollment Projection For capital facilities planning, growth protections are based on cohort survival and ' student yield from documented residential construction projected over the next six years. (see Table 2) The student generation factor, as defined on the next page, is the basis for ' the growth projections from new developments King County live births and the District's relational percentage average were used to ' determine the number of kindergartners entering the system. (see Table 1) 8.325% of 22,680 King County live births in 2005 is projected for 1,888 students expected in Kindergarten for October 1, 2010 Together with proportional growth from new ' construction, 8.32% of King County births is equivalent to the number of students projected to enter kindergarten in the district for the next six-year period (See Table2) State-funded Full Day Kindergarten ("FDK") programs at 20 schools require an ' adjustment to the Kindergarten forecast for projecting FDK at 1 0 FTE for capital facilities planning. At schools with half-day Kindergarten programs and the ' optional Tuition-based FDK, Kindergarten is projected at .50 FTE. (See Table 2A) Early Childhood Education students (sometimes identified as "Preschool Special ' Education [SE] or handicapped students") are forecast and reported separately. Capacity is reserved to serve the ECE programs at seven elementary schools The first grade population is traditionally 7 - 8% larger than the kindergarten population due to growth and transfers to the District from private kindergartens. Cohort survival method uses historical enrollment data to forecast the number of students projected for the following year , Near term projections assume some growth from new developments to be offset by current local economic conditions With notable exceptions, the expectation is that , enrollment increases will occur District-wide in the long term District projections are based on historical growth patterns combined with continuing development of projects in the pipeline dependent on market/growth conditions ' The District will continue to track new development activity to determine impact to schools and monitor conditions to reflect adjustments in this assumption The six-year ' enrollment projection anticipates moderate enrollment growth from new development currently in some phase of planning or construction in the district Information on new residential developments and the completion of these proposed , developments in all jurisdictions may be considered in the District's future analysis of growth projections. ' Within practical limits, the District has kept abreast of proposed developments. The Kent School District serves seven permitting jurisdictions, unincorporated King County, the cities of Kent, Covington, Auburn and Renton and smaller portions of the cities of SeaTac, Black Diamond, and Maple Valley. The west Lake Sawyer area of Kent School District is in the city of Black Diamond. (Continued) , Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2010 Page 4 ' ' I I Six -Year Enrollment Projection (Continued) STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR "Student Factor" is defined by King County code as "the number derived by a school district to describe how many students of each grade span are expected to be generated by a dwelling unit" based on district records of average actual student generated rates for developments completed within the last five years. Following these guidelines, the student generation rate for Kent School District is as follows. Single Family Elementary .486 Middle School .130 Senior High .250 Total .866 Multi-Family Elementary .331 ' Middle School .067 Senior High 124 Total .522 The student generation factor is based on a survey of 2,023 single family dwelling units and 1,527 multi-family dwelling units with no adjustment for ' occupancy rates. Please refer to Appendix E on Page 36 of the Capital Facilities Plan for details of the Student Generation Factor survey. The actual number of students in those residential developments was determined using the District's Education Logistics (EDULOG) Transportation System. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2010 Page 5 O ' p c M N Lo c0 N � It in < m ti rn m 0 o 0 0 0 v N co ^ N N m N N N N N m v g O M op O 10 O (O .- O Q r M M N O O N O m O < ID ^ O O N ap tD Q c0 e} r Q [D Q M N N Q r M O` O) O O O O LL7 N O� N ppm m N N O N N O ' 2 (")pp m h O) O r Q M Q N W O r N O Q m N N - j _ N Q 0 R O N O rn O O O O N N A N y O y�j tD c ? '^ m N N � r S 1[7 n E a a ' N O o M pppp N Q O Q O M r M p] h O YV O O V l+1 a0(p ON Nry ( QO V. Y OD - nn cC N N N N N N N IlJ n @ K O m C O M LO V r t0 O O. .n Q 4r c O nry N lh O? O! pp m N N dp N N N N N N N (Ni N Q E i0 0 a CD � (tpp LO o Q N N N try (n rn prn r r (o o _9 a@i avi � @ o y� O N 1(J O OI OI O O N N 1�') (�l N V O P ,2 O m N N O - - - N N N N cl N N .- .- N N 4� c c r 2 @ F » u @ N E N m "ppQ O(O aO NN N ppID VN (QOO MN OyV' Q tOp 1Np aOD LDC fLn W0 1m p v R Q ccC? rn o o o N D W N N (V N cl E4mMUZ QD ) Nm>c M N N N cl N N N N Nco =N b L y m N O r O N N tN d LL T Si OrzM o Z O Ol O O N (D CpO M ap M O N m (0 a c $ y Z" c O m a N O O O O N O N O (OV Z ^ 0 N N ' co CV N N N N N N N N N .- N (D a ,� W m O y LL U U d Q o N N r O N N N N r O yD L O N A 5 rn o d' m o N o o o o n o n m E w c m o NJ r' N co Of r N N N N N N N N N •- N N Qi °6 , _ , O mN @ O W a w QI M f` Q N 00 1Q� c0 N M O In M Of N N (V m n '@O W aO J c QI ry o� NC! O N CD � D O Cl � M (MO N m w O Y H c o O r 0 N p7 N N N N N N N Q M (� O w 0 00 N W M O) (O (O N M M M r N 0 5 Ol M O O O O O O O r) T (p (.] Cp O 00 W LL m N � N N N N - .- I..- W ^ N V L t @ LLIZ O NN O `�_ N O N O a0 Q O r M N m , Y U.U. c W $ O Q Q O O O O Ol -q al cr a0 O O ^D N C D C t a0 N 0 a N fV .-- .- M O a' N y u O W Y � N d .O @ O OpT LA d Um y LU C W m O (t1 n (O u'S (rD M V QOi V O 001 N (00 O O A Y T c O C 2 0 O) (� C'! Q N N O O) m Of c0 W W N LD (D N M ^ N N O a - co 0 d E m v p w 0 W O N ^ N r Q r M pr 1n W O M O N m E 01 ap O pl o O O) m Qi O) W r n (O O M O a N e o co O W o O) v N O N m N OI O .- cp N o] tD O Ol N T M @ •- a .�. U @ ro N OJ -O cl .- e- -7 O @ @ Oct W W r r O O a a N a O a D. O O d V LL E r o. 1(1 0 0 C N N W N U h LL O ry N M Q M N p� Q N M aD O N kn ' O) u> O N ^ N W O N N < c0 tp (O O M e0 O c G a c0 li c CD O 00 W - M r N r r (O (O N Q Q M N a N «O @ C N m ap w C N @ C L L L OI m E d N NI Q1 al @ m O y J IO m U C C O O r H m p U y oCL (L n w > y Rl C C m m a@`+ v c cc y o. rn L m w J w N D u v $ T m o u V1 c c E v N @ o tq v v co O- N M aD O N e W v 3 o c c N c g rn rn > v v a D �+ O N N N N N N N 41 N N D U p UI a V a a a a a U a m T W c a o OL N N M M M (0 mN @ @ c`6 N (0 O c F- t i0 w `c C7 N m KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 SIX-YEAR F T E ENROLLMENT PROJECTION ' State-funded FDK at 20 Schools LB in 2004 LB in 2005 LB in 2006 LB in 2007 LS in 2008 LB Est 2009 LB Est 2010 ACTUAL P R O J E C T 1 O N October 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 King County Live Births ' 22,874 22,680 24,244 24,899 25,222 25,500 25,600 ' 1 increase Decrease 443 -194 1,564 655 323 278 100 Kindergarten/ Birth % 2 8 32% 8 32% 8 32% 8 32% 8 32% 8 32% 8 32% 21' Kindergarten FTE @ 5 758 230 295 323 336 348 352 113 FD Kindergarten @ 1.0 386 1,428 1,428 1,428 1,428 1,428 1,428 Grade 1 1958 1,966 1,982 2,106 2,153 2,170 2,185 Grade 2 1962 1,990 2,019 2,036 2,162 2,210 2,228 Grade 3 1976 2,011 2,062 2,092 2,109 2,239 2,289 ' Grade 4 2044 1,939 1,985 2,035 2,064 2,081 2,209 Grade 5 2086 2,069 1,974 2,021 2,071 2,101 2,118 ' Grade 6 2070 2,112 2,106 2,010 2,057 2,108 2,138 Grade 7 2115 2,095 2,156 2,150 2,052 2,100 2,152 Grade 8 2168 2,165 2,157 2,220 2,214 2,113 2,163 Grade 9 2467 2,497 2,504 2,495 2,567 2,561 2,444 Grade 10 2213 2,114 2,157 2,163 2,156 2,218 2,212 Grade 11 1956 1,915 1,768 1,804 1,809 1,803 1,855 ' Grade 12 1619 1,611 1,586 1,465 1,495 1,499 1,494 Total FTE Enrollment 25,778 26,142 26,179 26,348 26,673 26,979 27,267 Note V 314 Yearly Increase 3 -50 364 37 169 325 306 288 Yearly Increase/Decrease% -0 19% 1.41% 0.14% 0.65% 1 23% 1.15% 1.07% Cumulative Increase -50 314 351 520 845 1,151 1,439 ' Full Time Equivalent(FTE) 25,778 1 26,142 1 26,179 1 26,348 1 26,673 1 26,979 27,267 ' Kindergarten enrollment protection is based on Kent SD percentage of live births in King County five years previous ' 2 Kindergarten FTE protection is calculated by using the District's previous year percentage of King County births five years earlier compared to actual kindergarten enrollment in the previous year (Excludes ECE-Early Childhood Education) ' 3 Kindergarten protection is at 1 0 FTE for 20 schools qualifying for State-Apporlionment or Grant-funded Full Day Kindergarten(FDK) Schools with 1/2 Day Kindergarten and Optional Tuition-based Full Day Kindergarten programs are protected at 5 FTE 4 Oct 2009 P223 FTE is 25,778&Headcount is 26,764 Full Headcount with ECE Preschool&Running Start students=27,567 G R O W T H P R O J E C T I O N S - Adjustments for current economic factors For facilities planning purposes, this six-year enrollment projection anticipates conservative enrollment growth from new development currently in some phase of planning or construction in the district Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 2 April 2010 Page 7 E c� g U > O 2 d W d' - w U w } 0 0' W J m , W (n Q (� U U U U 4J W LLL 0 0 0 2 ' Y. -� � � 2 2 z d d d � 0 0 U cn N = � a m N M O m O M O m O en- O O E M O � N N m al WW O O d Y 00 T LL O � LL d O LL N T nl IOp 1"1 w N Cc N ti m OG o CL w , N O r U m O �_ rn O w L w LL 3S 0 lL m IL0 0 O U n Y _ a z N O ~ y v g C O 1 LLI m o LL E b 6 W a n n IA) o V d o Y Y 0 a O W W c O m 0 h m W c F o �' n n LL n coo m n e a U Q i o 0 0 c m Q NLLI w y v E c N O O 2 Cl) c U U J Y N o w y y > f-' O Z = LL `p :� u rn coY n n M O O O vvi � LL �Na E a � _ m 0 Q 3 L p zLU N p E M CDI- LJ,J m O) Q h 0 O� h 0 0 0 �t] u) �tJ O Of <O � A �O N O� V N N N O O O� � U H LL J o 0 v v v v o �n ..r v v o �n � o �n v v �n v v �n a �n �i gi v o �h �i q• cn a o O E a m � d �= m � > 037 LL3: W O w0w >- mCC w O O xUmcr w ° o UQ a UU UU W ww000 za a d m (nfnrn Q v s C LL N U J u a d O 0 - O y L LL , } E `0 m CL E coc 2 w c c m E ° E E 9 d E E E a c E E y c Fa m W ugg�� g� m E E c c E �' m m m E U c r m �' E c w °� m W y E c m m u E w y a E O d L } w u m r E c y d d ,j ? w w , E d W w w E c v, E c a y z m >, w E m 10 w E y c m c ai _w w c y 9 a a o w w m Z• _c o _x W N C w N R W O W y N y p' ] D W E O y N w o UO W Y E 0 Y L (n m o o w 9 0 rn m w U E o ❑ ? m w J > c 3 = m g m N N c W Y c v c t O h- 3. 0 U w h m Y i W N O N E m N N N O N N N N Cal N N C D N J 0 6 J W N O , U O U U w w LL 007 C7 x Y J f z a a a w N (n 0) � :: o z z c m Y , III Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" In order to determine the capacity of facilities in a school district, King County Code 21A 06 references a "standard of service" that each school district must establish In order to ascertain Its overall capacity. The standard of service ' identifies the program year, the class size, the number of classrooms, students and programs of special need, and other factors determined by the district which would best serve the student population. ' This Plan Includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District The District has identified schools with significant special needs programs as ' "Impact" schools and the standard of service targets a lower class size at those facilities. Relocatables included in the capacity calculation use the same standard of service as the permanent facilities. (See Appendv A, e & C) ' The standard of service defined herein may continue to change in the future. Kent School District is continuing a long-term strategic planning process combined with review of changes to capacity and standard of service. This process will affect various aspects of the District's standard of service and future changes will be reflected In future capital facilities plans. Current Standards of Service for Elementary Students Class size for Kindergarten is planned for an average of 24 or fewer students. Class size for grades 1 - 4 is planned for an average of 25 or fewer students. IClass size for grades 5 - 6 is planned for an average of 29 or fewer students. Program capacity for general education elementary classrooms is calculated at t an average of 24 students per classroom because of fluctuations between primary and intermediate grade levels (i.e. third/fourth or fourth/fifth grade split classes, etc.). Most elementary schools meet the criteria required to provide full day kindergarten programs (FDK = Full Day Kindergarten) with the second half of the day funded by state apportionment, grants or tuition. ' Students have scheduled time in a computer lab. Students may also be provided music instruction and physical education in a separate classroom or facility. Special Education for students with disabilities may be provided in a self- contained classroom with a capacity of 10-15 depending on the program. (continued) Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2010 Page 9 III Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" (continued) Identified students will also be provided other educational opportunities in i classrooms for programs such as those designated as follows: English Language Learners (E L L) , Self-contained Special Education Support Center Programs (SC) Integrated Programs & Resource Rooms (for special remedial assistance) , Early Childhood Education (ECE) (3-4 yr old students with disabilities) School Adjustment (SA) Program for severely behavior-disordered students Speech & Language Therapy & Programs for Hearing Impaired students Adaptive Support Center for Mild, Moderate & Severe Disabilities (ASC-DD) Occupational & Physical Therapy Programs (OTIPT) Developmental Kindergarten in SC Programs ' Kindergarten Academic Intervention Program (KAI-Full Day Kindergarten) Education for Disadvantaged Students (Title I) — Federal Program Learning Assisted Programs (LAP) — State Program District Remediation Programs Education for Highly Capable Students (formerly "Gifted" Program) Some of the above special programs require specialized classroom space, as , well as music and physical education classrooms, computer labs, etc , thus, the permanent capacity of some of the buildings housing these programs is reduced. ' Some students, for example, leave their regular classroom for a short period of time to receive instruction in these special programs and "pull-out" space must be allocated to serve these programs Some newer buildings have been constructed to accommodate most of these programs; some older buildings have been modified, and In some circumstances, these modifications reduce the classroom capacity of the buildings. When programs change, program capacity is updated to reflect the ' change In program and capacity. Current Standards of Service for Secondary Students The standards of service outlined below reflect only those programs and educational opportunities provided to secondary students which directly affect the capacity of the school buildings. Class size for grades 7 - 8 is planned for an average of 29 or fewer students , Class size for grades 9 - 12 is planned for an average of 30 or fewer students. Special Education for students with disabilities may be provided in a self- , contained classroom with a capacity of 10-15 depending on the program. (continued) ' Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2010 Page 10 III Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" (continued) ' Identified secondary students will also be provided other educational opportunities in classrooms for programs designated as follows: Computer, Multi-media &Technology Labs & Programs—(Nova Net-Advanced Academics) Technology Academy programs at Kent-Meridian High School & Mill Creek Middle School Science Programs & Labs — Biology, Chemistry, Physics, Oceanography, Astronomy, Meteorology, Marine Biology, General Science, etc English Language Learners (E L L) Integrated Programs & Resource Rooms (for special remedial assistance) Basic Skills Programs Transition Outreach Program (TOP) for 18-21 year old Special Education students Child Development Preschool and Daycare Programs ' Music Programs— Band, Orchestra, Chorus, Jazz Band, etc. Art Programs— Painting, Design, Drawing, Ceramics, Pottery, Photography, etc. Theater Arts— Drama, Stage Tech, etc Journalism and Yearbook Classes Highly Capable (Honors or Gifted) and Advanced Placement Programs International Baccalaureate ("I B") Program Kent Phoenix Academy—Performance Learning Center, Gateway, Virtual High School & ' Kent Success program with evening classes designed for credit retrieval Traffic Safety Education JROTC -Junior Reserve Officers Training Corps ' Variety of Career&Technical Education Programs (CTE-Vocational Education) Family & Consumer Science—Culinary Arts, Sewing, Careers w/Children/Educ , etc. Health & Human Services— Sports Medicine, Sign Language, Cosmetology, etc. Business Education—Word Processing, Accounting, Business Law& Math, DECA, ' FBLA(Future Business Leaders), Sales & Marketing, Economics, Web Design Technical & Industry — Woodworking, Cabinet Making, Building Trades, Metals, Automotive & Manufacturing Technology, Welding, Machine Shop, Drafting, Drawing, CAD (Computer-aided Design), Electronics, Engineering & Design, Aviation,etc. Graphic& Commercial Arts, Media, Photography, Theater& Stage, Ag & Horticulture Many of these programs and others require specialized classroom space which can reduce the permanent capacity of the school buildings. In addition, alternative home school assistance, choice and transition programs are provided ' for students in grades 3 - 12 at Kent Mountain View Academy. Space or Classroom Utilization ' As a result of scheduling conflicts for student programs, the need for specialized rooms for certain programs, and the need for teachers to have a work space during their planning periods, It is not possible to achieve 100% utilization of regular teaching stations at secondary schools. Based on the analysis of actual utilization of classrooms, the District has determined that the standard utilization rate is 85% for secondary schools Program capacity at elementary schools reflects 100% utilization at the elementary level with adjustments for pull-out programs served in relocatables In the future, the District will continue close analysis of actual utilization. Kent School Distnct Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2010 Page 11 III i 1 I V Inventory and Capacity of Existing Schools ' Currently, the District has permanent program capacity to house 27,531 students ' and transitional (relocatable) capacity to house 1,459 This capacity is based on the District's Standard of Service as set forth in Section I 11. Included in this Plan is an inventory of the District's schools by type, address and current capacity (See Table 3 on Page 13) The ratio between permanent capacity and transitional capacity is 97% - 3%. The program capacity is periodically updated for changes in programs, additional ' classrooms and new schools. Program capacity has been updated in this Plan to reflect program changes and new capacity for the new Panther Lake Elementary and building additions at the high schools. Kent Mountain View Academy (formerly Kent Learning Center and Grandview , Elementary) serves Grades 3 — 12 with transition, choice and home school assistance programs. It is located in the former Grandview School in the western part of the District in the city of SeaTac. This school was originally designed as i an elementary school and is included in the elementary capacity for this Plan. Kent Phoenix Academy is a non-traditional high school which opened in Fall , 2007 in the renovated site and building that formerly served Sequoia Middle School. Kent Phoenix Academy has four special programs including the Performance Learning Center, Gateway, Virtual High School and Kent Success. Kent Success replaced the former Night Academy at Kent-Meridian High School and provides afternoon and evening classes for credit retrieval Calculation of Elementary, Middle School and Senior High School capacities are set forth in Appendices A, B and C A map of existing schools is included on Page 14. , Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2010 Page 12 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.415 INVENTORY and CAPACITY of EXISTING SCHOOLS 2009-2010 Year SCHOOL Opened ABR ADDRESS Program Capacity ' Carriage Crest Elementary 1990 CC 18235-140th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 452 Cedar Valley Elementary 1971 CV 26500 Timi Way SE, Covington 98042 402 Covington Elementary 1961 CO 17070 SE Wax Road, Covington 98042 498 Crestwood Elementary 1980 CW 25225-180th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 456 ' East Hill Elementary 1953 EH 9825 S 240th Street, Kent 98031 464 Emerald Park 1999 EP 11800 SE 216th Street, Kent 98031 504 Fanwood Elementary 1969 FW 16600-148th Avenue BE, Renton 95058 408 George T Daniel Elementary 1992 DE 11310 SE 2481h Street, Kent 98030 450 Glenridge Elementary 1996 GR 19405-120th Avenue SE,Renton 98058 456 Grass Lake Elementary 1971 GL 28700-191st Place SE, Kent 98D42 452 Horizon Elementary 1990 HE 27641 -144th Avenue SE, Kent 98042 504 Jenkins Creek Elementary 1987 JC 26915-186th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 398 Kent Elementary 1999;1938 KE 24700-64th Avenue South, Kent 9BD32 464 Lake Youngs Elementary 1965 LY 19660-142nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042 510 ' Martin Sol Elementary 1987 MS 12711 SE 248th Street, Kent 98030 474 Meadow Ridge Elementary 1994 MR 27710-108th Avenue SE Kent 98030 464 Meridian Elementary 1939 ME 25621 -140th Avenue SE, Kent 98042 524 Millennium Elementary 2000 ML 11919 SE 270th Street, Kent 98030 498 ' Neely-O'Brien Elementary 1990/1955 NO 6300 South 236th Street, Kent 98032 440 Panther Lake Elementary 200911938 PL 20831 -108th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 552 Park Orchard Elementary 1963 PO 11010 SE 232nd Street, Kent 98031 480 Pine Tree Elementary 1967 PT 27825-11 Bth Avenue SE, Kent 98030 522 Ridgewood Elementary 1987 RW 18030-162nd Place SE, Renton 98058 504 Sawyer Woods Elementary 1994 SW 31135.228th Ave SE,Black Diamond 98010 504 Scenic Hill Elementary 1950 SH 26025 Woodland Way South, Kent 98030 464 Sods Creek Elementary 1971 SC 12651 SE 218th Place, Kent 98031 408 Spnngbrook Elementary 1969 SB 20035-100th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 398 Sunrise Elementary 1992 SR 22300-132nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042 504 Elementary TOTAL 13,154 Cedar Heights Middle School 1993 CH 19640 SE 272 Street,Covington 96042 923 Mattson Middle School 1981 MA 16400 SE 251 st Street, Covington 98042 793 Meeker Middle School 1970 MK 12600 SE 192nd Street, Renton 98058 890 Meridian Middle School 1958 MM 23480-120th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 790 Mill Creek MS&Technology Academy 2 2005/1952 MC 620 North Central Avenue, Kent 98032 B28 Northwood Middle School 1996 NW 17007 SE 184th Street, Renton 98058 972 Middle School TOTAL 5,196 1 Kent-Meridian HS&Tech Academy 1951 KM 10020 SE 256th Street, Kent 98030 1,851 Kentlake Senior High School 1997 KL 21401 SE 300th Street,Kent 98042 2,157 Kentndge Senior High School 1968 KR 12430 SE 208th Street, Kent 98031 2,270 Kentwood Senior High School 1981 KW 25800-164th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 2,137 Senior High TOTAL 8,415 Kent Mountain View Academy 3 1997/1965 MVILC 22420 Military Road, Des Manes 98198 416 Kent Phoenix Academy 4 2DO711966 PH 11000 SE 264th Street, Kent 98030 350 DISTRICT TOTAL 27,531 1 Changes to capacity reflect program changes and new building additions at high schools 1 Mill Creek Middle School and Technology Academy replaced renovated Kent Junior High in 2005 a Kent Mountain View Academy serves grades 3-12 The school was formerly known as Kent Learning Center&Grandview Elementary 4 Kent Phoenix Academy is a non-traditional high school which opened 1n Fall 2007 in the former Sequoia MS building Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 3 April 2010 Page 13 L ' c p 0 � � Z 0U uc � o 00 U C c O j N • h p Y Y N A N D N v in 'O .� � Qy O N 30 C3 a� m00 p .`.. ,� U CC a u H •8 C 0) 0 > p p O v.. G O t 0 O vu ;E 0 c pCL V .� TOm a =N 3 C �w •a) p U :� �► �!T a DOw C C Y 2 O N- _ c U6 00 0 y@ 0 O j CO U• � 0 • � 6 0 W 0r 0E 5 w , �C 34) a0 o w 00 "mE UW • Y N� 0 �YT C� QQD-0V — Uw Cd 000 , N Y 0.2 Y �« �-a L • C 0 0) L u0i 0 0 �U E p E 62 d W`• N N� ; 0 W gi•TU v yN oou L he oICI dg a Nd o)E 3S aAV�h91> chU) oa a 0 0C 0r D E ycE a� Wd o0d 0 C `mE 0 W o J>W 0 u,o Z �d • o ' v 3S anV 410h1 L • c 0 LO N 0 �^ • y E o W 60 E ^E^\ N T Y •W 0 3S aAV PUZ£L N S W 3S and PU'L£L W r OTC Ob 01 m0 Oy C 76 Z' 00 �� 9U • i35 • CC d� U �� • o` -N• m mT m� o =:) oy x m m� Q UW v� Y� do ro� v �� and `oE" •`0 m>•2W C0 ti n 3 •a)v 71 oE• oil uc c oW �nw 'a C0 •au /0 - O 6 V W NW Qe � • •C 0 —C fn y uwi 3S aAV 4180 t E W 6) w Y a w• <n O cn O Q ��• J«C• i`pT • 3SaAV4+hot oc O cn 0 O0 mE LE oEE o o°o �T 02 O O NW dW Ww0 NN 0C �W E c� O C C W m= 0 W G U) m Y 00 `O Iq N �9t any 10111.190 To Z-�C At3mgbiH Aallon!saM • V C • d`- N T D0 « O C 9k E > �m m 0y W N gE ON 0 O Q zW Y�Q • '�a1bISJa10l Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2010 Page 14 , V Six-Year Planning and Construction Plan At the time of preparation of this Plan in spring of 2010, the following projects are completed or in the planning phase in Kent School District: • Three new classrooms were added when the Auxiliary Gym project was recently completed for Kent-Meridian High School Planning for construction is in progress for the next project that will also provide additional classroom capacity at Kent-Meridian in 2011 • In February 2006, voters approved construction funding for replacement of Panther Lake Elementary School A new site was acquired nearby and the "Nevi' Panther Lake Elementary opened in Fall 2009 with a 28% increase in capacity The district has received authorization from OSPI for`Old" Panther Lake Elementary School to be held in reserve for utilization in the event of flooding in the Kent Valley. • Planning is nearly complete for a replacement school for Covington Elementary School. The project is on hold pending satisfactory financial resources to fund the project • In February 2006, voters also approved construction funding for a future Elementary School identified as Elementary#31 (actual#29)to accommodate new growth. • Enrollment projections reflect future need for additional capacity at the elementary school level Future facility and site needs are reflected in this Plan. • Some funding is secured for purchase of additional portables and some funding may be provided by impact fees as needed Sites are based on need for additional capacity As a critical component of capital facilities planning, county and city planners and decision-makers are encouraged to consider safe walking conditions for all students when reviewing applications and design plans for new roads and developments. This should include sidewalks for pedestrian safety as well as bus pull-outs and turn-arounds for school buses. Included in this Plan is an inventory of potential projects and sites identified by ' the District which are potentially acceptable site alternatives in the future (See Table 4 on Page 16& Site map on Page 17) ' Voter approved bond issues have included funding for the purchase of sites for some of these and future schools, and the sites acquired to date are included in this Plan Some funding is secured for purchase of additional sites but some may ' be funded with impact fees as needed Not all undeveloped properties meet current school construction requirements and some property may be traded or sold to meet future facility needs. 2006 voter approval of $106M bond issue for capital improvement included the construction funding for a new elementary school, replacement of Panther Lake Elementary, and classroom additions to high schools Some impact fees will also be applied to those projects. The Board will continue annual review of standard of service and those decisions will be reflected in the each update of the Capital Facilities Plan. Kent School Distnct Six-Year Capital Faaaies Plan April 200 Page 15 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.415 t Site Acquisitions and Projects Planned to Provide Additional Capacity Protected Projected %for SCHOOL / FACILITY ! SITE LOCATION Type Status Completion Program new Date Capacity Growth Approxima a Approximate Map Map ELEMENTARY (Numbers assigned to future schools may not correlate with number of existing schools) Replacement 13 Replacement for Panther Lake Elementary (F) 10200 SE 216th St,Kent 98031 Elementary Utilized Fall 2009 552 28% New Panther Lake Elementary Site (F) Site 2009 28% ' Replaced Emergency Panther Lake Elementary-Replaced in 2009 BE 208 Street&1081h Ave SE Elementary Reserve 2009 -396 Replacement 5 Replacement for Covington Elementary (U) SE 256th Street&154th Ave SE Elementary Planning 2014-15 600 20% Covington Elem-To be replaced 17070 SE Wax Road, Covington Elementary Planning 2014.15 -498 New Elementary#31 (Actual#29) (F) To be determined 2 Elementary Planning 2014-15 600 100% Site for Elementary#31 (Unfunded)' To be determined 2 Site Planning 2013-14 100% MIDDLE SCHOOL , No Projects required at this time SENIOR HIGH ' Classroom Kent-Meridian HS-3 Classroom Additions (F) 10020 SE 256th Street,Kent Additions Utilized 2009-10 79 100% Classroom In Kent-Meridian HS-2 Classroom Additions (F) 10020 SE 2561h Street,Kent Additions Progress 2011-12 53 100% Additional ' TEMPORARY FACILITIES I Capacity Relocatables For placement as needed New Planning 2010+ 24-31 each 100% SUPPORT FACILITIES Bus Facility (Unfunded)' Near Kent-Meridian High School New Utilized 2010 N f A tt on Land Use Map a OTHER SITES ACQUIRED Type Jurisdiction 4 Covington area North (Near Mattson MS) SE 251 &164 SE, Covington 98042 Elementary City of Covington ' 7 Covington area South (Scarsella) SE 290&156 SE, Kent 98042 Elementary King County 5 Covington area West (Halieson-Wikstrom) SE 256&154 SE, Covington 98042 Elementary City of Covington 3 Ham Lake area (Pollard) 16820 SE 240, Kent 98042 Elementary King County , B SE of Lake Morton area (West property) SE 332&204 SE, Kent 98042 Secondary King County 2 Shady Lk area(Sowers,Blaine,Drahota, Paroline) 17426 SE 192 Street, Renton 95058 Elementary King County 1 So King Co Activity Center(Nike site) SE 167&170 SE, Renton 98058 TBD' King County 12 South Central site (Plemmons-Yeh-Wms) SE 286th Street&124th Ave SE,Auburn 98092 TBD z King County Notes ' i Unfunded facility needs will be reviewed in the future 2 TBD-To be determined-Some sites are acquired but ptacement, timing and/or configuration have not been determined. , 3 Numbers correspond to sites on Site Bank Map on Page 17 Other site locations are parcels identified in Table 7 on Page 27 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 4 April 2010 Page 16 @� "N � O .� O _\ ± Or O / 5 ) 2\ \ ` : 2& =J ` :> J 0 2 , E' �' ° @ \E \ �■ : ?: i\ :! fa: / /) ?` - `\ , \\ }\ : m > � ^ /® � « «, e i7 0 a ! � G QR \_\e \{ ` 6t (D-P_^ 2 \D ®� . »� :f - » ®` / @ ° �) }\ _ s�_o /! !« !: : :> fJ } ' , ' /\ : . q) ®y /� - :§ ]:, :/ ), >, - _, ® a: »/ , ,: ` :E a< d :[e + ` ®q ° aeAV L4190. 212 g w / 2i( _ z�- »eAV WVO: e }, _, Q/e :i ®® #{ 0C / / ® f k \ - �D E ` ~ ^ AOAN w,Gm e> ;f -f 3 , / }> q :y/ D ® ~ }§2 ® �Kent School mr mAr Capital Fac;+smn April 201■ Page 17 V I Relocatable Classrooms , For the purpose of clarification, the term "portables" and the more descriptively accurate term, "relocatables" are used interchangeably in this Plan. The Plan also references use of portables or relocatables as interim or transitional , capacitylfacdities. Currently, the District utilizes 121 relocatables to house students in excess of ' permanent capacity, for program purposes at school locations, and several for storage or other purposes (See Appendices A B C D) Based on enrollment projections, implementation of additional full day kindergarten programs, program capacity and the need for additional permanent capacity, the District anticipates the need to purchase some additional relocatables during the next six-year period. The continually escalating cost of moving relocatables will increasingly limit the choice between buying or building , new relocatables on site and relocating older ones. During the time period covered by this Plan, the District does not anticipate that all of the District's relocatables will be replaced by permanent facilities During the useful life of some of the relocatables, the school-age population may decline in some communities and increase in others, and these relocatables provide the flexibility to accommodate the immediate needs of the community. Portables, or relocatables, may be used as interim or transitional facilities: 1. To prevent overbuilding or overcrowding of permanent school facilities 2. To cover the gap between the time of demand for increased capacity and completion of permanent school facilities to meet that demand. 3. To meet unique program requirements. Relocatables currently in use are continually evaluated resulting in some being improved and some replaced. Quality concerns will be among those addressed by the next Community Facilities Planning Committee for review of capital facilities needs for the next bond issue. The Plan projects that the District will use relocatables to accommodate interim housing needs for the next six years and beyond. The use of relocatables, their impacts on permanent facilities, life cycle and operational costs, and the ' interrelationship between relocatables, emerging technologies and educational restructuring will continue to be examined. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2010 Page 18 V I I Projected Six-Year Classroom Capacity As stated in Section I V, the program capacity study is periodically updated for changes in special programs and reflects class size fluctuations in Grades K - 4, As shown in the Inventory and Capacity chart In Table 3 on Page 13, the program capacity is also reflected in the capacity and enrollment comparison Charts. (See Tables 5&5 A-B-C on pages 20-23) ' Enrollment is electronically reported to OSPI on Form P-223 on a monthly basis and funding apportionment is based on Annual Average FTE (AAFTE). The first school day of October is widely recognized as the enrollment "snapshot in time" to report enrollment for the year. Full Time Equivalent (FTE) student enrollment for October 2009 was 25,777,90. Kindergarten students are reported at .5 although many schools provide full day kindergarten ("FDK") with alternative funding for the second half of the day. 1 State Apportionment-funded Full Day Kindergarten programs will report and project some Kindergarten students at 1 00 FTE at qualifying FDK schools The P-223 FTE Report excludes Early Childhood Education (preschool) students and College-only Running Start students. (see Tables 5&5 A-B-Con pages 20-23) In October there were 697 students in 11t' and 12th grade participating in the Running Start program at 10-20 different colleges and receiving credits toward both high school and college graduation. 391 of these students attended classes only at the college ("college-only") and are excluded from FTE and headcount for capacity and enrollment comparisons Kent School District continues to be the fourth largest district in the state of Washington P-223 Headcount for October 2009 was 26,764 with kindergarten students counted at 1.0 and excluding ECE and college-only Running Start students. A full headcount of all students enrolled in October 2009 totals 27,567 which Includes ECE and college-only Running Start students. Based on the enrollment forecasts, current inventory and capacity, current standard of service, relocatable capacity, and future planned additional classroom space, the District anticipates having sufficient capacity to house students over the next six years. (See Table 5 and Tables 5 A-B-C on Pages 20-23) ' This does not mean that some schools will not experience overcrowding There may be significant need for additional portables and/or new schools to accommodate growth within the District Some schools, by design, may be opened with relocatables on site. Boundary changes, limited and costly movement of relocatables, zoning changes, market conditions, and educational I restructuring will all play a major role in addressing overcrowding and underutilization of facilities In different parts of the District. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2010 Page 19 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 ' PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY TOTAL DISTRICT SCHOOL YEAR 2009.2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2ols 2o1s-201s Actual P R O J E C T E D Permanent Program Capacity ' 27,296 27,531 27,531 27,584 27,584 27,584 28,286 ' Changes to Permanent Capacity ' Kent-Meridian HS-2009-10 Additions(F) 79 t Kent-Meridian HS-2011-12 Additions(F) 53 Replacement schools with protected Increase in capacitty ' Panther Lake Elementary2 (Funded) 552 Replaced previous school capacity -396 , Covington Elementary 3 (unfunded) 600 To Replace current school capacity -498 New Elementary#31 (Funded) 600 Permanent Program Capacity Subtotal 27,531 27,531 27,584 27,584 27,584 28,286 28,286 Interim Relocatable Capacity Elementary Reiocatable Capacity Required 0 192 288 504 816 432 696 Middle School Relocatable Capacity Required 417 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Senior High Relocatable Capacity Required 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Relocatable Capacity Required'&s 1 0 192 288 504 816 432 696 TOTAL CAPACITY ' 1 27,531 27,723 27,872 28,088 28,400 28,718 28,982 TOTAL FTE ENROLLMENT/PROJECTION 5 25,778 26,142 26,179 26,348 26,673 1 26,979 27,267 , DISTRICT AVAILABLE CAPACITY 7 1,753 1,581 1,693 1,740 1,727 1,739 1,715 ' Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes 2 Replacement school for Panther Lake Elementary opened in Fall 2009 with 28%increased capacity for 156 students 3 Replacement school for Covington Elementary will increase capacity and will be built on a different existing site 4 In Fall 2004, 9th grade moved to the high schools which increased capacity available at Middle School 7th-8th grade levels. 5 FTE= Full Time Equivalent Enrollment/Projections (i e 112 day Kindergarten student= 5&Full Day Kindergarten student= 1 0 FTE) e 2009-2010 total classroom relocatable capacity is 1,459 7 School capacity meets concurrency requirements and no impact fees are proposed for middle schools Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 April 2010 Page 20 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 LPROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY SENIOR HIGH - Grades 9 - 12 SCHOOL YEAR 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 Actual P R O J E C T E D Senior HI h Permanent Capacity ' 8,686 8,765 8,765 8,818 8,818 8,818 8,818 Includes Kent Phoenix Academy 2 - Changes to High School Capacit Kent-Meridian HIS- 2009-10 Additions (F) 3 Classrooms added (@ 85%Utilization) 79 Kent-Meridian HS-2011-12 Additions (F) 2 Classrooms added (@ 85%Utilization) 53 Subtotal 8,765 8,765 8,818 8,818 8,818 8,818 8,818 Relocatable Capacity Required ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL CAPACITY ' 8,765 8,765 8,818 8,818 8,818 8,818 8,818 FTEENROLLMENT/PROJECTION 3 8,256 8,137 8,015 7,927 8,027 8,081 8,005 SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 509 628 803 891 791 737 813 Number of Relocatables Required 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 No Classroom Relocatables required at this time Some Relocatables used for classroom and program purposes ' Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes z Kent Phoenix Academyopened in Fall 2007 serving p g grades 9- 12 with four special programs ' 3 FTE=Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment or protections,excluding College-only Running Start students Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 A April 2010 Page 21 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY MIDDLE SCHOOL - Grades 7 - 8 SCHOOL YEAR 2009-2010 2010-2011 1 2011-2012 2012-2013 1 2013-2014 2014-2015 1 2015-2016 Actual P R O J E C T E D Middle School Permanent Capacit ' 5,196 5,196 5,196 5,196 5,196 5,196 5,196 Changes to Middle School Capacit 4 Mill Creek MS 8 Kent Technolo gy Academy are open during Phase 2 of Renovation (No new capacity added in renovation) Subtotal 5,196 5,196 5,196 5,196 5,196 5,196 5,196 Relocatable Capacity Required ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL CAPACITY 'a 3 5,196 5,196 5,196 5,196 5,196 5,196 5,196 FTE ENROLLMENT/PROJECTION 2 4,283 4,260 4,313 4,370 4,266 4,213 4,315 SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 4 913 936 883 826 930 983 881 Number of Relocatables Required 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No Classroom Relocatables required at middle schools at this time Some Relocatables used for classroom and program purposes ' Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes 2 FTE =Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment or Projections 3 Surplus capacity due to grade level reconfiguration -All 9th grade students moved to the high schools in Fall 2004 ° Middle School capacity meets concurrency requirements and no Impact fees are collected for middle schools ,Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 B April 2010 Page 22 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY ELEMENTARY - Grades K - 6 SCHOOL YEAR 2009-2010 zoto-zott 2011-2012 2012-2013 1 2013-2014 2014-2015 1 2015-2016 Actual P R O J E C T E D Elementary Permanent Capacity ' 12,998 13,570 13,570 13,570 13,570 13,570 14,272 Kent Mountain View Academy 2 416 Changes to Elementary Capacity Replacement schools with projected increase in capacity Panther Lake Elementary 4 (Funded) 552 Replaces current school capacity -396 Covington Elementary° (Unfunded) 600 Will replace current Covington Elem capacity -498 tNew Elementary#31 (Funded)5 600 Subtotal 13,570 13,570 13,570 13,570 13,570 14,272 14,272 Relocatable Capacity Required ' 0 192 288 504 816 432 696 TOTAL CAPACITY 2 13,570 13,762 13,858 14,074 14,386 14,704 14,968 FTE ENROLLMENT/PROJECTION 3 13,239 13,745 13,851 14,051 14,380 14,685 14,947 SURPLUS (DEFICIT)CAPACITY 331 17 7 23 6 19 21 Number of Relocatables Required 0 8 12 21 34 18 29 34 Classroom Relocatables required in 2013-14 Some additional Relocatables used for program purposes 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes 2 Kent Mountain View Academy is a special program at the former Grandview School serving students in Grades 3-12 The school building(formerly Kent Learning Center& Grandview Elem )was designed as an elementary school 3 FTE=Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment or Projections(Kindergarten @ 5 or 1 0&excluding ECE) Kindergarten projection is at 5 FTE for Half Day Kindergarten programs or optional Tuition-based Full Day Kindergarten Kindergarten projection is at 10 FTE for 20 Full Day Kindergarten programs funded by state apportionment or grants 4 Replacement school for Covington Elementary will increase capacity and will be built on different existing site I5 Site selection and construction timing for Elementary431 is pending review of location and capacity needs Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 C April 2010 Page 23 V I I I Finance Plan w The finance plan shown on Table 6 demonstrates how the Kent School District plans to j finance Improvements for the years 2010 - 2011 through 2015 - 2016. The financing components Include secured and unsecured funding and Impact fees. The plan is based on voter approval of future bond Issues, collection of Impact fees under the State Growth Management Act and voluntary mitigation fees paid pursuant to State Environmental Policy Act In February 2002, voters approved a $69.5 million bond issue for capital construction and improvements The bond issue partially funded building additions at three high schools which coincided with moving 91h grade students from junior high to senior high schools in September 2004 The District received some State Funding Assistance (formerly known as "state matching funds") and has utilized impact fees for the senior high additions In February 2006, voters approved a $106 million bond issue that included funds for replacement of Panther Lake Elementary School with increased capacity, as well as construction of an new elementary school to accommodate growth The new Panther Lake Elementary School opened in Fall 2009. The bond issue also funded Phase II of the renovation for Mill Creek Middle School and renovation of Sequoia Middle School for reconfiguration as a new non-traditional high school, Kent Phoenix Academy, which opened in September 2007 2006 construction funding approval also provided for some additional classrooms at Kentlake High School and two projects at Kent-Meridian High School. Some impact fees will be utilized for the new construction that will increase capacity. Due to a significant decrease in the district's 2010 real property assessed valuation, the district deferred a $15 million bond sale that was originally planned for 2009 The district has applied for an equivalent allocation of Qualified School Construction Bonds (QSCB) from OSPI for a potential sale in 2010. If financing plans for bands under this program are successful, the district will be able to continue with construction projects specified in the 2006 bond authorization. The district has designated $16 million of the 2006 bond authorization for construction of an additional elementary school (Elementary #31), currently scheduled for completion in the fall of 2014, dependent on enrollment levels Although the school is identified as "Elementary School #31" it will actually be the 29th elementary school in the district. Enrollment projections reflect future need for additional capacity at the elementary level and unfunded facility needs will be reviewed in the future. Some funding is secured for additional portables and some will be funded from impact fees. For the Six-Year Finance Plan, costs of future schools are based on estimates from Kent School District Facilities Department Please see pages 26-27 for a summary of the cost basis Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2010 Page 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O n 1V) 'IT Q) N V fffDDD N 0 0 0 a CD o u 0 0 0 U ID N N w D D cl j w bo O c o N w O O O o O 0 �p C O C O V N O aOp O O Q D oa O N O fA co U _ry fA l!] N (D ch H O J O O O O O O O O J o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q o C 0 0 a o ro to �n coo F- n � o� r, )n OtD H w � 6 o W4 N N I z° g o a o E V d N OV U W N cl N Z H m 0 2 J � o CD M 0 o o R O Q N v0 vo N H V 6 o) m to K a. w w F N Z c o 0 ami d o ui N O N N V O i N [V rl: E Rcc N cc M m V 7 U Y N m E o m c a o y E o a o a o O O O rn O y d N cl clin Y N E .c ° o + LL W LL 7 LL LL a N O '^ LL V y N 0V j � E p N ' Eo E U m cn W 'C V U a V C _ E W_ n a) W ~ u tt E H J C C N J_ O O � � m a N d N = OE V0)LL V W Q .U. Q Q Cl Z Nf6 N m O 4 Z O m5 O ~n n = i0A cn O U K m Y w m Z, EL a o m N U) U) W in m �^ m W 'a CO C IL -) C 0 _ u C J c0 m E ¢ u y u y m Y N OC1 N O V W LL m H ILL U IL Y Y d 0 W n a V I I I Finance Plan - Cost Basis Summary For Impact fee calculations, construction costs are based on cost of the last elementary school, adjusted for inflation, and projected cost of the next elementary school. Elementary School Cost Projected Cost Millennium Elementary #30 Opened In 2000 $12,182,768 Cost of Panther Lake Elementary Replacement (Opened In Fall 2009) $26,700,000 Projected cost - Covington Elementary ' Replacement (Projected to open In 2014) $31,840,000 Projected cost of Elementary#31 In 2014 $31 ,840,000 ■ Average cost of Covington Elem i replacement & Elementary #31 $31,840,000 Construction cost of high school additions: Senior High School Additions Projected Cost Total Kent-Meridian HS — 2009-10 Addition #1 $2,500,000 Kent-Meridian HS — 2011-12 Addition #2 $7,000,000 Construction cost of new HS capacity $9,500,000 Site Acquisition Cost , The site acquisition cost is based on an average cost of sites purchased or built on within the last ten years Please see Table 7 on page 27 for a list of site acquisition costs and averages District Adjustment The impact fee calculations on pages 29 and 30 include a "District Adjustment' which is equal to the amount of Increase that the Impact fee formulas drive out for this year and adjusted for Increase In the Consumer Price Index. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2010 Page 26 d N d Q d d N � of IL 0 () d m r y n m L�f7 y (D Q Q O n rn r OD t (N t! Oy m 0 N 'n y 00 h m Q E r - A co W f NIm F A > EH O 00 CO 00 d' OD N Q m eN cm- M ONO O000 00 LO V OD O `^ f- O CD cD O N Uf W H l (D U)l Ln Goa Efl as9 ea e3 cA M O N m wO -ItN O 7 h- .- ao N r r (D N N O M r LO CD O 0) 0) r CO O O O W(D 0 Ln (`) c0 In IT w mO t- N O �) V U OD O Ln V 0 m m O -It (D 'd' O LO (O 00 O -ItM LD (M <- 06 r 69 Efj Efl � ch � V rn EH M fA 69 EA (fl (i U 3 ER m r m Ef3 H U L Q N LO C'J d 0 O � N M CDM 00 co a U O O m LO (D O LO Q O N r M CD (o V M LO Ln r O o O O C 0 a w N U a Z to m u' o Y 0)O _ ° o M 2 N 0 � O[ C > .� y N s N C N D!' u v d y = E [ N N N Y co o n J 0 (n 0 0 W V Kml Opp N N N N U W O y 7 N N N N N N (n O QL O o co Q U o O U L 7 W N 3 m a) W n. g mii m m rn m Y o > a N 0 o 0 c C7 n a m 0 o d @ > N N C y Q m p c 'd 0 a Q :! o C min to v 0 Q o H m C m Y E ac o m m o m m o a = m y E (n o o g U o Y c m H °1' t, : m mm m v CL Y O L Y a U7 t v N u H m C (n O p 'O udi c0 > >. U OL m c d a O U N m = o Q L m n Z o 3 m N = L) ¢ u o m U d h c o In a li Y t L m n ym 0 0v 5ryry U = U m O J J E U N p 3 d d d m Y >, m J m m rn x o m v U '> E _ ° m w `m r L [ _ N 3 a a c U 2 (n to N y > L6 U a w Z (R Y Y Y 2 u N N y 0) w N o m m a m t [ m m �' m rn m `d c c O T mc O E to 7 [ c Z OfM) m = ~ co W •- " fn N (0 7 M n N y C Y KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT FACTORS FOR ESTIMATED IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS Student Generation Factors- Single Family Student Generation Factors - Multi-Family Elementary (Grades K- 6) 0.486 Elementary 0 331 Middle School (Grades 7- 8) 0 130 Middle School 0 067 Senior High (Grades 9 - 12) 0 250 Senior High 0 124 Total 0 866 Total 0 522 Projected Increased Student Capacity OSPI -Square Footage per Student Elementary 600 Elementary 90 Middle School 900 Middle School 117 Senior High 132 Senior High 130 Special Education 144 Required Site Acreage per Facility Elementary (required) 11 Average Site Cost/Acre Middle School (required) 21 Elementary $287,573 Senior High (required) 32 Middle School $0 Senior High $0 New Facility Construction Cost Elementary' $31,840,000 Temporary Facility Capacity & Cost Middle School $0 Elementary @ 24 $123,430 Senior High r $9,500 000 Middle School @ 29 $0 .See cost basis on Pg 26 Senior High @ 31 $0 Temporary Facility Square Footage State Funding Assistance Credit(rormary"State Match') Elementary 70,892 District Funding Assistance Percentage 56 06% Middle School 16 376 Senior High 22,064 Total 3% 109,332 Construction Cost Allowance CCA-CostlSq.Ft Area Cost Allowance(Effective July 09) $174.26 Permanent Facility Square Footage Elementary (includesKMVA) 1,47D,543 Middle School 667,829 District Average Assessed Value Senior High 1,111,036 Single Family Residence $277,129 Total 97% 3,249,408 Total Facilities Square Footage District Average Assessed Value Elementary 1,541,435 Multi-Family Residence $109,125 Middle School 667,829 Apartments 71% Condos 29% Senior High 1,133,100 Total 3,342,364 Capital Levy Tax Rate/$1,000 Current 1$1,000 Tax Rate(1 7236) $1 72 Developer Provided Sites/ Facilities t Value 0 General Obligation Bond Interest Rate Dwelling Units 0 Current Bond Interest Rate 4 33% Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2010 Page 28 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Site Acquisition Cost per Single Family Residence Formula ((Acres x Cost per Acre)/Facility Capacity)x Student Generation Factor Required Site Acreage I Average Site Cost/Acre I Facility Capacity Student Factor A 1 (Elementary) 11 $287,573 600 0 486 $2,562.28 A (Middle School) 21 $0 1,065 0130 $0 A 3 (Senior High) 32 $0 1,000 0 250 $0 0 866 A `t' $2,562 28 Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Single Family Residence Formula ((Facility Cost/Facility Capacity)x Student Factor)x(Permanent/Total Square Footage Ratio) Construction Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratro B 1 (Elementary) $31,840,000 600 0 486 097 $25,016 69 B 2 (Middle School) $o 900 0 130 097 $0 B 3 (Senior High) $9,500,000 132 0 250 097 $17.452 65 0 866 B b $42,469 34 Temporary Facility Cost per Single Family Residence Formula ((Facility Cost!Facility Capacity)x Student Factor)x(Temporary/Total Square Footage Ratio) Facility Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio C 1 (Elementary) $123,430 24 0 486 003 $74 98 C 2 (Middle School) $0 29 0 130 003 $0 C 3 (Senior High) $0 31 0 250 003 $0 0.866 C $74.98 State Funding Assistance Credit per Single Family Residence (formerly"State Match") Formula Area Cost Allowance x SPI Square Feet per student x Funding Assistance% x Student Factor Area Cost Allowance SPI Sri Ft /Student Equalization°/ Student Factor D 1 (Elementary) $174 26 90 05606 0 486 $4,272 97 D 2 (Middle School) $174 26 117 0 0 130 $0 D 3 (Senior High) $174 26 130 01606 0 250 $3,174 93 D c::> $7,447 90 Tax Credit per Single Family Residence Average SF Residential Assessed Value $277,129 Current Capital Levy Rate/$1,000 $1 72 Current Bond Interest Rate 4 33% Years Amortized (10 Years) 10 TC b $3,588 18 Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility/Site Value L Dwelling Umts 0 0 FC b 0 ' Fee Recap A = Site Acquisition per SF Residence $2,562 28 B = Permanent Facility Cost per Residence 142,469 34 C = Temporary Facility Cost per Residence $74 98 Subtotal $45,106 60 D = State Match Credit per Residence $7,447 90 I TC=Tax Credit per Residence Subtotal $3,588 18 $11,036 08 Total Unfunded Need $34,070 52 50% Developer Fee Obligation $17,035 FC=Facility Credit(if applicable) 0 1 District Ad)ustment (See Page 26 for explanation) ($11,549) Net Fee Obligation per Residence-Single Family $5,486 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2010 Page 29 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENCE Site Acquisition Cost per Multi-Family Residence Unit Formula ((Acres x Cast per Acre)/Facility Capacity)x Student Generation Factor Required Site Acreage Average Site Cost/Acre Facility Capacity Student Factor , A 1 (Elementary) 11 $287,573 500 0 331 $2,094 11 A 2 (Middle School) 21 $0 1,065 0 067 $0 A 3 (Senior High) 32 $0 1,000 0 124 $0 0 522 A A $2,09411 Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Multi-Family Residence Unit Formula ((Facility Cost/Facility Capacity)x Student Factor)x(Permanent/Total Square Footage Ratio) Construction Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio B 1 (Elementary) $31,840,000 600 0 331 097 $17,038 11 B 2 (Middle School) $0 900 0 067 097 $0 B 3 (Senior High) $9,500,000 132 0 124 097 $8,656 52 0 522 8 $25,694 63 Temporary Facility Cost per Multi-Family Residence Unit Formula ((Facility Cost i Facility Capacity)x Student Factor)x(Temporary 1 Total Square Footage Ratio) Facility Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio C 1 (Elementary) $123,430 24 0 331 003 $51 07 C 2 (Middle School) $0 29 0 067 003 $0 C 3 (Senior High) $0 31 0 124 003 $0 0 522 C K $51 07 State Funding Assistance Credit per Multi-Family Residence(formerly"State Match") Formula Area Cost Allowance x SPI Square Feet per student x Funding Assistance% x Student Factor Area Cost Allowance SPI Sq Ft /Student Equalization°% Student Factor D 1 (Elementary) $174 26 90 05606 0 331 $2,910 19 D 2 (Middle School) $174 26 117 0 0 067 $0 D 3 (Senior High) $174 26 130 05606 0 124 $1,574 77 D a $4,484 96 Tax Credit per Multi-Family Residence Unit Average MF Residential Assessed Value $109,125 Current Capital Levy Rate/$1,000 $1 72 Current Bond Interest Rate 4 33% Years Amortized (10 Years) 10 TC b $1,412 92 Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility/Site Value Dwelling Units 0 0 FC b 0 Fee Recap A = Site Acquisition per Multi-Family Unit $2,094 11 B = Permanent Facility Cost per MF Unit $25,694 63 C = Temporary Facility Cost per MF Unit $51 07 Subtotal $27,839 81 D = Slate Match Credit per MF Unit $4,484 96 TC=Tax Credit per MF Unit $1,412 92 Subtotal - $5,897 87 Total Unfunded Need $21,941 93 50% Developer Fee Obligation $10,971 FC=Facility Credit(if applicable) 0 District Adjustment (See Page 26 for explanation) ($7,593) Net Fee Obligation per Residential Unit-Multi-family $3,378 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2010 Page 30 IX Summary of Changes to April 2009 Capital Facilities Plan The Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") is updated annually based on previous Plans in effect since 1993. The primary changes from the April 2009 Plan are summarized here. New Panther Lake Elementary School replaced "Old" Panther Lake Elementary and opened in Fall 2009. "Old" Panther Lake Elementary is being held in reserve for utilization in the event of flood emergency in the Kent Valley. Future protects include replacement and expansion of Covington Elementary School, future new Elementary School #31, and two protects that increase capacity at Kent-Meridian High School to accommodate new growth. Changes to capacity continue to reflect fluctuations in class size as well as program changes Changes in relocatables or transitional capacity reflect use, purchase, sale, surplus and/or movement between facilities. The student enrollment forecast is updated annually. Six-year Kindergarten protections were modified to meet the requirements for Full Day Kindergarten programs funded by state apportionment and grants. The district expects to receive some State Assistance (formerly "matching") funding for projects in this Plan and tax credit factors are updated annually Biennieal update of student generation rates was completed this year. Unfunded site and facility needs will be reviewed in the future. Changes to Impact Fee Calculation Factors Include- ITEM Graderrype FROM TO Comments Student Generation Factor Elem 0 445 0 486 Biennial Update in 2010 Single Family(SF) Ms 0 118 0 130 SH 0 245 0 250 Total 0 808 0 866 + 58 Student Generation Factor Elem 0 296 0 331 Biennial Update in 2010 Multi-Family(MF) Ms 0 075 0 067 I SH 0 111 0 124 Total 0 482 0 522 + 40 District Equalization Ratios(former state Match) 55 78% 56 06% Per OSPI Website Area Cost Allowance (former Boeckh Index) $168.79 $174 26 Per OSPI Website Average Assessed Valuation (AV) SF $348,876 $277,129 Per Puget Sound ESD AV-Average of Condominiums &Apts MF $121,557 $109,125 Per Puget Sound ESD Debt Service Capital Levy Rate 1$1000 $1 73 $1 72 Per King Co Assessor Report General Obligation Bond Interest Rate 4 96% 4 33% Market Rate Impact Fee- Single Family SF $5,394 $5,486 Change to fee+$92 Impact Fee - Multi-Family MF $3.322 $3,378 Change to fee+$56 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2010 Page 31 1 j X 1 Appendixes Appendix A: Calculations of Capacities for Elementary Schools Appendix B: Calculations of Capacities for Middle Schools Appendix C: Calculations of Capacities for Senior High Schools Appendix D: Use of Relocatables Appendix E: Student Generation Factor Survey i t � 1 I Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2010 Page 32 M M a Zw O Y F X F G F F Q F. 5 G Q x Q Q F Y a C Q wc o Q m Pv m Z O N w W U u w o W d E A w a w m o m o o U Z W W N o N O O O O Ol N O M O O O O M M m a O m m m M O O M O a s 7 g E N o m In m o a 0 o o 0 0 n o m 0 0 0 m m In 0 In m g m Go N `° v N uNi a o u0i a INn a M a In < a , rmi m o o w x W C O a 0 0 0 0 N n O O O O O O N y O N m O N O O O O N O O O O IN n C c l~L u + a o oy C a W d N R O O O tq O O O O O O N O O N O I� O O O N O O O O O N y d ¢ 2 E v m U n = N Q w m U 0Y1 F m y a ¢ ro E, o N V M N M N M M N O �- O M O m d N M �-- O C� M N M O a x m Z O N = N J C N m N IL. O LL K o a� i p` F D O a` ry N O Q N m O O In m LLi O IA V O N a N I� N N O O �O'1 d M C9 o YY Z O O tp6 < O a a C N V V Q Q J ~ N U N N rmr���� W g W V N UCL 2 m E ��pp p m �p p ttpp ��pp mm �p m a N a IL Z (n N O In O O O N O th In R In N In M < O O Vj O O U`r C U Q N 2 F 0 a N N W U n C Q F c Y a W W U m m m N n N M If1 Y Q N n m n M m M M m M n p � N m V m N M N Y Q w U C F' O. N N m W ¢ w E M m m m O O M I(J M O C7 U N O m m m M x I� N = e u E N O N n rn _' m ¢ a � z `o U E � pp W m m O e a N N m Ol m N N W .n- N N .W 00- N N N n .n- N a m CO 7 Z a U m N Wh M y !n y II C rn m U m m 3 = a v W o j W U m E rn 2 Z (L O S m m w ¢ U v w w 3 o c7 x Y s z a a a w n N E o c a O fl a 0 e d L w a E z � F w o Y N 2 w w i m w E m L 3 = m Y z. E cm o w m g S L y O N s w C m N VI N 1 Y m m o' m m E 0 y m `o 0 m N c ` _ a 3 c4i o c c W fE mE Y x w cD 0 c5 x Y z a a a tt N fn In In c m O o n c d Y i M m m m EL � c H O O N n M O O O O O m n N m n n « •1' O Z N U a0 n n N N N N O E m 00 n N N N w r O n t0 m lD m (0 R { D O` .- �- N N M M pj D = p C p C W m ry (np (} a W 2 w D Y) Q 0 w = p Z 8 s N N t~i E m O O O tN0 OLJ b O N aM0 O O N L m m II Z M O O W N m co LL E N n N M O t0 n to W O N C n (p m m m (0 p N E op n O M N U >. m C Ni F, •- d W d W .- N N .-- N K 10 N J w Z w W N x U n m a m n o W N N m o > .o m o y R U O QOf U io � U Ta H E W E m = 2 o m E m m m O m 8 m a O (T O N 2 N O O 10 < O N w 7 O O V th O N d L m O m O G I.- U LL u v L w m R N n W u ti y J d y d m L m in Q CD aW r V r F o € p N D m E d' U N Q n LLyJ M U W C y pCl) z a C Q 1�m0 U NWN NL U) f� m2 tr OC MMW U U R X X o L Q m m E c Vl ~ u m -' m o 7 u') m io u m al .- a z m u c G1 } A E N 2` R N (m V m W N O M = N M M CD ac D C tT V �' U a U m c d U)i a U m d m LLI o o J D m m IL c a D' U d O o E u m m a m c6 Q O W 0. m y N n - 7 N N 0 ry Q a m € N w to 0 Q a00 O m LU U Q UZ u) a v w U a U c m m w Q _ 6 m o W L N m W F' • A U M O) 0 V to n N m w N tT V ? x Y V m ciOi m uni L) m .� m a c O f S N o Q vwi w U rn m a 00 v g u w U m '� rmi °) aoi m ami c nV N a 2 2 i O O) p M Nm CO on V) N O D M �_ m n j O tOD T N m N O N e n N to t0 n m 10 ur U U m N M U @ O N E m N o a o Q' `o B E N v M m o M M `o a M m rn m M -- QLOM o o 0, # (n U M N lh N M M rn )C) In t0 m N O N Q�i O` z o ' m D mo N 8 = W m 2 Q Y = U Q U g g Z Q Y Y Y X d E E D D m y > d W O D U y W D w o o g g 8 a ¢ = a E Q m w a t U) 0 U) > u p =z N m > u Um Q O t6° ut`qi r nwz 0 c E _o o CO ° O oV) v) x o a v m m O ma c c ra co 0 co E CD Q x o `m v 3 Y a a o a m m o N N m m ami d = o Y y a`i ai d Y Y cn ° o E c U Z Y Y Y Y (n W m w O U C m Y @ � ! \ � 7 3 ( , / $ - \ ) . n ( © {M ( { � e \ / 0 § t x § § ) \ { § k E ! a ? 0 _ « , \ \ • , " \ \ \ / Q U) / — — \ Q f # $ 0 § \ 0 2 ; _ ; & z ~ } ( § \ \ kcu \ } \to # / / \ ( \ CT co ) \ } , ; / ) \ 2 / _ � » — _ ) ] cof ® /In m } ) j / & _ _ )_ @ . Ir ) cu ) 0 } f / ® j / _ k } ) \ \LL — _ t o ) / 3 2 / 3 E { @ � a r N m m P1 M m N r r r 0 O m r N t�l W fD m 7 U a O M m 00 m u� o o m mv rn v r W r v r ^ tV x N N N N O N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C O O O O O O O O O O O N 0 C � 0 d U U Q Ly m m O p o e} p m O m r r mm 7 O M pr m 0 p O mp N O C N O O 7 N Nl NO W N_ _O O m O T C O tO'1 N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O p C O O O O O O O O O o O O E N ONl mO cN7 r mOO C N N C Om1 W m m ap COS E m Q m N N (NO c7 cNp OW M t N tO O N m N V' m C" W o 0 0 o p o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w O 0 o O 0 0 0co 0 0 j ��pp pp� � tpp O 0 O m W m Oml co V O O V O c0 A Co O M 5 m f� N tr) !m0 Lo QO O O O O O �- a-- O O O O O O N O p O O O O O O O O U) N m m V m O m Ch m m V N N N N = N N N N r N m N CO to N 0 cT C 7N < Y N W N N V R W N N C r N r m O ° @ N N T a � U o N pp W ^ W co 7 m TN 1 W 0 W Li N X Q CO N M 1� ti t0 m N W N n 0 T Z W J a O C f") F a0 N dQ N O C 2 O N U T C1i T � _0 r a ro v a° x x W 2 m to y U x U U' U U K U < U w 0 LL w U Z N LL SU' Y w w m � .N. C Y E Ta� 0 C E c. > ° m v d > ED = m c a 0 w �` CD a 0 rn c c o Y Y y _ 6 O N m O O IO a3cN gd U YE c O � a YJy rN 0 0 c O _ Oof LL. Y a 9 m 0 o id o LL Y aIL 0 mQ o O O O UlUi, l0 Y L Q L O Q LL W mm ;n Fn S K s at6i ,n a n Yo 4. d S m af0i U o d Y m a U p m g a 0 U vdi a@i x m d U U m m a L d _ a W Y w h W N N E E L C C N (C t0 N m N O O O > g U Y U C 7 q W W W LL LL 2 Y Z 6. Q' N f F- t- Q Q Q LL V. a� a N N O L U) C N Y DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE for jKent School District No. 415 2010 Capital Facilities Plan Issued with a 14-day comment and appeal period. Description of Proposal: This threshold determination analyzes the environmental impacts associated with the following actions, which are so closely related to each other that they are in effect a single action. 1. The adoption of the Kent School District 2010 Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan by the Kent School District for the purposes of planning for the facilities needs of the District 2. The amendment of the King County Comprehensive Plan to include the Kent School District 2010 Capital Facilities Plan as a part of the Capital Facilities Plan Element of the King County Comprehensive Plan. 3. The amendment of the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Kent to include the Kent School District's 2010 Capital Facilities Plan as part of the Capital Facilities Plan Element of the Comprehensive Plans of the City of Kent. 4 The amendment of the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Covington to include the Kent School District's 2010 Capital Facilities Plan as part of the Capital Facilities Plan Element of the Comprehensive Plans of the City of Covington. 5. The amendment of the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Auburn to include the, Kent School District's 2010 Capital Facilities Plan as part of the Capital Facilities Plan Element of the Comprehensive Plans of the City of Auburn 6. The amendment of the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Renton to include the Kent School District's 2010 Capital Facilities Plan as part of the Capital Facilities Plan Element of the Comprehensive Plans of the City of Renton 7. This proposal may also involve amendment of Comprehensive Plans of the Cities of Maple Valley, Black Diamond, and/or SeaTac to incorporate the Kent School District 2010 Capital Facilities Plan into the Capital Facilities element of that jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan. Proponent Kent School District No 415 Location of the Proposal* The Kent School District includes an area of approximately 72 square miles. The City of Covington and portions of the cities of Kent, Auburn, Renton, Black Diamond, Maple Valley, and SeaTac fall within the District's boundaries, as do parts of unincorporated King County. Lead Agency: Kent School District No. 415 is the lead agency pursuant to WAC 197-11-926. , The lead agency for this proposal has determined that the proposal does not pose a probable significant adverse impact to the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43 21 C.030 (2) (c) This decision was made after a review of the completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency This information is available to the public upon request This Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date of issue Comments must be submitted by 4 00 p.m., June 22, 2010 The responsible official will reconsider the DNS based on timely comments and may retain, modify, or, if significant adverse impacts are likely, withdraw the DNS If the DNS is retained, it will be final after the expiration of the comment deadline. Responsible Official: 1 w Fred H Assistant Superintendent fbrtusiness Services Kent School District No. 415 Telephone, (253) 373-7295 Address: 12033 SE 256th Street#A-600 Kent, Washington 98030-6643 Appeals of this determination are governed by Board Policy No 9280 which can be obtained from Fred High, Assistant Superintendent for Business Services, Kent School District No. 415, 12033 SE 256th Street #A-600, Kent, Washington 98030-6643 and pursuant to WAC 197-11- 680 and RCW 43 21 C 075 Date of Issue- June 8, 2010 Date Published June 8, 2010 i ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAC 197-11-960 Environmental Checklist. Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43 21 C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required Instructions for Applicants This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or"does not apply." Complete a answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations Answer these questions if you can If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonprotect proposals- Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be +� answered "does not apply" In addition, complete the Supplemental Sheet for nonprotect actions (part D). For nonprotect actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "prepares," and "affected geographic area," respectively. I 1 A BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: The adoption of a six-year Capital Facilities Plan by the Kent School District. The Comprehensive Plans of King County, City of Kent, City of Covington, City of Renton, City of Auburn and possibly Cities of Maple Valley, Black Diamond and SeaTac have been and/or will be amended to include the Kent School District 2010 Capital Facilities Plan in the Capital Facilities Plan Element of each jurisdiction's ' Comprehensive Plan. A copy of the District's Plan is available for review in the District Finance & Planning Department. 2 Name of applicant: Kent School District No. 415. 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Kent School District No. 415 12033 SE 256th Street #A-600 Kent, WA 98030-6643 Contact Person Fred H High, Assistant Superintendent for Business Services Telephone: (253) 373-7295 4. Date checklist prepared June 2, 2010 5. Agency requesting checklist- Kent School District No. 415 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): The 2010 Kent School District Capital Facilities Plan is scheduled to be adopted in June, 2010 and forwarded to King County, Cities of Kent, Covington, Auburn, Renton, Maple Valley, Black Diamond, and SeaTac for possible inclusion in each jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan. The Capital Facilities Plan will be updated annually. Site-specific projects have been or will be subject to project-specific environmental review. 7 Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. The Capital Facilities Plan reviews additions to existing high schools and proposes construction of a new elementary school and a replacement of Covington Elementary School. 2 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. The above-referenced projects will undergo environmental review at the time of formal proposal. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain No. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. King County and Cities of Kent, Covington and Auburn will review and approve the Capital Facilities Plan for the purposes of impact fee ordinances and will need to adopt the Plan as an amendment to the Capital Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of King County and Cities of Kent, Covington, Renton and Auburn Cities of Maple Valley, Black Diamond, and SeaTac may also review and approve the Plan for the purposes of any school impact fee ordinances and may adopt the Plan as an amendment to the Capital Facilities element of their Comprehensive Plans 11. Give a brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal You do not need to repeat those answers on this page (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) This is a non-project action This proposal involves the adoption of the Kent School District 2010 Capital Facilities Plan for the purpose of planning the facilities needs of the District and for inclusion in the Capital Facilities Plan element and possible amendment of the Comprehensive Plans for King County, City of Covington, City of Kent, City of Renton, City of Auburn, City of SeaTac, City of Maple Valley and City of Black Diamond. A copy of the Capital Facilities Plan may be viewed at the Kent School District Business Services Department office. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address if any, and section, township, and range, if known If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s) Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The 2010 Capital Facilities Plan will affect the Kent School District The District includes an area of approximately 70 square miles The City of Covington, and portions of the Cities of Kent, Auburn, Renton, Black Diamond, Maple Valley, SeaTac and parts of unincorporated King County fall within the District's boundaries 3 B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other The Kent School District is comprised of a variety of topographic land forms and gradients, including all of those listed Specific topographic characteristics will be identified during the planning and permit process for each capital project b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Specific slope characteristics will be identified during the planning and permit process for each capital project c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural sods, specify them and note any prime farmland Specific soil types will be identified during the planning and permit process for each capital project d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Unstable soils may exist within the Kent School District. Specific soil limitations on individual project sites will be identified at the time of environmental review. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be subject to project- specific environmental review and local approval at the time of proposal. Proposed grading projects, as well as the purpose, type, quantity, and source of fill materials j will be identified as appropriate to each project. f Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. It is possible that erosion could occur as a result of construction projects currently proposed in the Capital Facilities Plan Individual projects and their erosion impacts will be evaluated on a site-specific basis Individual projects will be subject to environmental review and local approval on the time of proposal g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings?) Percentage of impervious cover will vary with each capital facilities project and will be addressed during project-specific environmental review. 4 h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any Erosion potential on individual protect sites will be addressed during project-specific environmental review. Relevant erosion reduction and control requirements will be met. 2 Air a What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Various emissions, many construction-related, may result from individual projects. Air-quality impacts will be evaluated during project-specific environmental review. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions b Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe Off-site sources and necessary mitigation will be addressed during project-specific environmental review c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any Plans for individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject to environmental review and relevant local approval processes, including obtaining of any necessary air quality permits, at the time individual projects are formally proposed. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. There is a network of surface water bodies within the Kent School District. The surface water regimes and flow patterns have been or will be researched and incorporated in the design of each individual project. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans Some projects may require work near these described waters. Individual projects in the Capital Facilities Plan will be subject to environmental review and local approval requirements at the time the project is formally proposed 5 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material Information with respect to placement or removal of fill or dredge material will be addressed at the time of protect-specific environmental review Applicable local regulations have been or will be satisfied 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known Any surface water withdrawals or diversions have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan Each capital facilities project, if located in a floodplain area, will be required to meet applicable local regulations for flood areas 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. Specific information regarding discharges of waste materials, if any, will be addressed during project-specific environmental review Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions b. Ground. 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water'? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may impact ground water resources Each project will be evaluated during project-specific environmental review Applicable local regulations have been or will be satisfied. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example. Domestic sewage, industrial, containing the following chemicals , agricultural, etc ) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve Impacts of discharged waste material, if any, have been or will be addressed during site-specific, project-level environmental review. y 6 c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known) Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may have varying storm water runoff consequences Each project will be subject to environmental review and applicable local regulations 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will have varying environmental impacts and will be subject to appropriate review and local regulations prior to construction Information regarding waste materials will be presented at the time of such review Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any- Specific measures to reduce or control runoff impacts have been or will be developed on a project-specific basis in cooperation with the appropriate jurisdiction. 4. Plants: a Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: _ deciduous tree- alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree. fir, cedar, pine, other = shrubs grass pasture = crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants. water lily, eelgrass, mdfotl, other _ other types of vegetation There are various vegetative zones within the Kent School District. An inventory of species has been or will be produced as part of project-specific environmental review b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? 7 Impacts on vegetation will be determined at the time of protect-specific environmental j review at the time the project is formally proposed Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Specific impacts to these species from individual projects has been or will be determined at the time of project proposal and will be addressed during site-specific, project-level environmental review d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any. Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be subject to environmental review and local approval at the time of project proposal. 5. Animals: l a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals deer, bear, elk, beaver, other. fish- bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: An inventory of species observed on or near sites has been or will be developed during project-specific environmental review. b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Specific impacts to these species from individual projects will be determined at the time of project proposal and will be reviewed in cooperation with the affected jurisdictions c Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Impacts on migration routes, if any, will be addressed during site-specific, project- level environmental review 8 d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Appropriate measures to preserve or enhance wildlife have been or will be determined at the time of site-specific, project-level environmental review. 6. Energy and Natural Resources: a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. The State Board of Education requires a life-cycle cost analysis of all heating, lighting, and insulating systems prior to allowing specific projects to proceed Energy needs will be decided at the time of specific engineering and site design planning. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe Individual projects of this Capital Facilities Plan will be evaluated as to their impact on the solar potential of adjacent projects during environmental review. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Energy conservation measures will be considered at the project-specific design phase and environmental review 7. Environmental Health: ` a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Proposed projects will comply with all current codes, standards, and rules and regulations Individual projects have been or will be subject to environmental review and local approval at the time of formal submittal 9 b. Noise: 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project(for example: traffic. equipment, operation, other)? A variety of noises exist within the Kent School District. Specific noise sources have been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site Normal construction noises would exist on a short-term basis during school construction There could be an increase in traffic or operations-related noise which would be addressed during project specific environmental review Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Project noise impacts have been or will be evaluated and mitigated during the project-specific environmental review Each protect is or will be subject to applicable local regulations. 8. Land and Shoreline Use: a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? There are a variety of land uses within the Kent School District, including residential, commercial, industrial, institutional, utility, agricultural, forestry, open space, recreational, etc. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. This question will be addressed during site-specific, project-level environmental review c. Describe any structures on the site. i Structures located on proposed sites have been or will be identified and described during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what* Structures to be demolished, if any, will be identified as part of the project-specific environmental review process e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? 10 There are a variety of zoning classifications within the Kent School District. Site specific zoning information has been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? An inventory of comprehensive plan designations has been or will be completed during project-specific environmental review. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Any shoreline master program designations have been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Environmentally sensitive areas, if any, will be identified during project-specific environmental review. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? This information has been or will be provided at the time of project-specific environmental review. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? It is not anticipated that proposed projects will displace any people Displacement of people, if any, will be evaluated during project-specific environmental review k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any. Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be subject to project- specific environmental review and local approval at the time the project is formally proposed I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any- Compatibility of the proposal and specific projects with existing uses and plans have been or will be assessed as part of the comprehensive planning process and during project-specific environmental review. 9. Housing: a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing No housing units would be provided. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Any impact of project proposals on existing housing have been or would be evaluated during protect-specific environmental review procedures c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Measures to reduce or control any housing impacts have been or will be addressed during site-specific, project-level environmental review. 10. Aesthetics: a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Aesthetic impacts have been or will be determined at the time of site-specific, project- level environmental review. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Aesthetic impacts have been or will be determined at the time of site-specific, project- level environmental review c Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Appropriate measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts have been or will be determined at the time of project-specific environmental review 11 Light and Glare: a What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Light or glare impacts have been or will be determined at the time of project-specific environmental review. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Light or glare impacts have been or will be determined at the time of project-specific environmental review. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Off-site sources of light or glare have been or will be evaluated at the time of project specific environmental review 12 d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Mitigation of light and glare impacts has been or will be addressed during project- specific environmental review. 12 Recreation: a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? There are a variety of formal and informal recreational facilities within the Kent School District. b. Would the proposed protect displace any existing recreational uses? if so, describe Recreational impacts have been or will be addressed during project specific environmental review Projects in the Capital Facilities Plan may enhance recreational opportunities and uses. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any Any adverse effects on recreation stemming from individual project proposals have been or will be subject to mitigation during the environmental review procedure. A school site usually provides recreational facilities to the community in the form of additional play fields and gymnasiums. 13 Historic and Cultural Preservation: a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe The existence of historic and cultural resources will be determined at the f e e time o project-specific environmental review b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. An inventory of historical sites has been or will be conducted as part of project specific environmental review. c Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Appropriate measures have been or will be proposed on a project-specific basis 13 14. Transportation: a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any Impact on public streets and highways has been or will be assessed during project- specific environmental review. b Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? The relationship between specific projects and public transit has been or will be assessed during project-specific environmental review. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? An inventory of parking spaces and the impacts of specific projects on parking spaces has been or will be conducted during project-specific environmental review. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private) The development of new schools may require new access roads or streets This issue will be fully addressed during project-specific environmental review e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Use of water, rail or air transportation has been or will be addressed during site- specific, project-level environmental review f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Each project proposal has been or will be separately evaluated as to traffic impacts. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Mitigation of impacts on transportation has been or will be addressed during project- specific environmental review. 15. Public Services: a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. 14 The District does not anticipate that the protects identified in the Capital Facilities Plan will substantially increase the need for other public services Impacts have been or will be evaluated on a project-specific basis b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Schools are built with automatic security systems, fire alarms, smoke alarms, heat sensors and sprinkler systems. 16 Utilities. a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. Utilities available at project sites have been or will be identified during project specific environmental review b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Utility revisions and construction needs will be identified during project-specific environmental review C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision Signature: `,. + ; • s' Fre`� Assistant SupertnteXdent for Business Services Date Submitted June 8, 2010 15 D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal or the types of , activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water, emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise'? To the extent this Plan makes it more likely that school facilities will be constructed, and/or renovated or remodeled, some of these environmental impacts will be more likely Additional impermeable surfaces, such as roofs, parking lots, sidewalks, access roads and playgrounds will increase storm water runoff, which could enter surface or ground water. Emissions to air could result from heating systems, emergency generators and other equipment, and from additional car and bus trips to and from the school for students and faculty Any emissions resulting from this Plan should not require the production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances, with the possible exception of storage of diesel fuel or gasoline for emergency generating equipment Noise may result from additional traffic and from concentrating several hundred children at a new facility, especially before and after school and during recesses To the extent this proposal allows additional residential development to occur, these impacts would also increase somewhat, but it is not possible to quantify those impacts at this time The impacts would depend on the type, location and distribution of housing, for example, whether single or multiple family and the location of the school. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Facilities implementing the Plan have been or will be evaluated at the project specific level and impacts will be mitigated accordingly. Storm water detention and runoff will meet applicable County and/or City requirements and, depending on the date of actual construction, may be subject to a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ("NPDES") permitting requirements Discharges to air will be minimal, and will meet any applicable requirements of the Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Authority Fuel oil will be stored according to local and state requirements 16 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? The Plan itself will have no impact on these elements of the environment. Depending on the particular site, construction of facilities may require clearing sites of plants and loss of animal habitat To the extent residential development is allowed, additional area may be cleared and eliminated as habitat for animals There are not likely to be any impacts on fish or marine life, although some water quality degradation in streams and rivers could occur due to increased residential development. These impacts have been or will be addressed in more detail during project-specific environmental review when appropriate Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: Individual projects will be evaluated and mitigated appropriately on a project-specific basis, but specific mitigation proposals cannot be identified at this time. 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Any actual projects resulting from this Plan would consume heating fuel and electrical energy. Increased traffic resulting from the construction of additional facilities would consume petroleum based fuels Reduced traffic resulting from construction of L another neighborhood school may also reduce amounts of fuel consumed, but it is not possible to quantify such reduction in consumption at this time These impacts have been or will be addressed in more detail during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are. ■ Facilities would be constructed in accordance with applicable energy efficiency e standards. 4 How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection, such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? The Plan and facilities constructed pursuant to the Plan should have no impact on these resources It is not possible to predict whether other development made possible by this Plan would affect sensitive areas Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: No specific measures are being proposed at this time Appropriate measures have been or will be proposed during project-specific review Annual updates of this Plan I will be coordinated with King County, Cities of Kent, Covington, Auburn, Renton, SeaTac, Maple Valley and Black Diamond as part of the Growth Management Act process, one of the purposes of which is to protect environmentally sensitive areas To the extent the School District's facilities planning process is part of the overall growth management planning process, these resources are more likely to be protected. 17 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? The Plan will not have any impact on land or shoreline use that is incompatible with existing comprehensive plans, land use codes, or shoreline management plans. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are- None are proposed at this time. Actual facilities constructed to implement the Plan ' will be sited and constructed to avoid or reduce land use impacts. 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? This proposal should not create substantial new demands for transportation The protects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may create an increase in traffic near new District facilities but also reduce traffic by creating the opportunity for more students to walk to a closer school The construction of the facilities included in the Capital Facilities Plan may result in minor increases in the demand for public services and utilities, such as fire and police protection, and water, sewer, and electric utilities. None of these impacts are likely to be significant The impacts on transportation and public services and utilities of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be addressed during project-level review when appropriate. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: No measures to reduce or respond to such demands are proposed at this time. 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment The Kent School District Capital Facilities Plan will not conflict with any laws or requirements for the protection of the environment 1 I 18 Auburn School District No. 408 1 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2010 through 2016 :.' n i LL �( $ k w �K Adopted by the Auburn School District Board of Directors May 10, 2010 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 408 915 Fourth Street NE Auburn, Washington 98002 (253) 931-4900 Serving Students in, Unincorporated King County City of Auburn City of Algona City of Kent City of Pacific BOARD of DIRECTORS Ray Vefik Carol Helgerson Lisa Conners Craig Schumaker Janice Nelson Dennis Kip Herren, Superintendent Auburn School District Engage Educate Empower 1 Table of Contents Section I Executive Summary ........................Page 1 Section II Enrollment Projections.....................Page 6 Section III Standard of Service........................ Page 8 Section IV Inventory of Facilities . ............ .. .Page 15 ` Section V Pupil Capacity..... . ................... .Page 18 Section VI Capital Construction Plan.................Page 21 Section VII Impact Fees........................ ..........Page 25 Section VIII Appendices........... ..................... . Page 29 Appendix A 1 - Student Enrollment Projections Page 30 Appendix A 2 - Capital Facilities Plan Projections Page 44 Appendix A 3 - Student Generation Survey Page 49 Auburn School District No 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2010 through 2016 Section I , Executive Summary Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2010 through 2016 I. Executive Summary This Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (the"Plan") has been prepared by the Auburn School District (the "District")as the District's principal planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act and the adopted ordinances of the counties and cities served by the District This plan was prepared using data available in the spring of 2010 This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the District However, this Plan is not intended to be the sole plan for all of the District's needs The District may prepare interim and periodic long-range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board Policies and actions, taking into account a longer or a shorter time period, other factors and trends in the use of facilities, and other needs of the District as may be required However, any such plan or plans will be consistent with this Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan To enable the collection of impact fees in the unincorporated areas of King County and within the City of Auburn and City of Kent, the King County Council, the City of Auburn and the City of Kent will adopt this Plan by reference as part of each jurisdiction's respective comprehensive plan To enable the collection of impact fees in the Cities of Algona and Pacific, these municipalities must also adopt this Plan and adopt school impact fee ordinances Pursuant to the requirements of the Growth Management Act and the local ordinances, the Plan will be updated on an annual basis, and any changes in the fee schedule(s)adjusted accordingly 1 The Plan establishes the District's "standard of service" in order to ascertain the District's current and future capacity While the State Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines do not account for the local program needs of the District The Growth Management Act and the school impact fee ordinance authorize the District to define its standard of service based on the District's specific needs In general, the District's current standard provides that class size for grades K-2 should not exceed 25 students; class size for grades 3-4 should not exceed 27 students, class size for grade 5 should not exceed 30 students When averaged over the six elementary grades, this computes to 26 5 students per classroom Class size for grades 6-12 should not exceed 30 students, with some subject areas restricted to lesser numbers (See Section III for more specific information ) The capacity of the schools in the District is calculated based on this standard of service and the existing inventory of facilities including transitional classrooms The District's 2009-10 capacity was 13,725 whereas Full Time Equivalent ("FTE") enrollment for this same period was 13,919 60 (includes Full Day Kindergarten) The actual number of individual students was 14,559 as of October 1, 2009 (See Section V for more specific information ) The capital construction plan shown in Section VI addresses the additions and proposed modernization to the District's existing facilities This provided for a new high school approved by the voters in February 2003 and opened in September 2005, and the addition of two new elementary schools approved by the voters in February 2005, with Lakeland Hills Elementary opening in the Fall of 2006 and Arthur Jacobsen Elementary opening in the Fall of 2007 The plan includes the construction of a new middle school and a new elementary school, as well as the acquisition of future school sites to accommodate growth The new facilities are required to meet the projected student population increase to be generated from the large development areas within the Auburn School District Three areas that have significant impact on the school 2 district are the Lakeland South, the Lea Hill, and the north Auburn valley areas of the district There are other pockets of development that impact the District as well The City of Kent has an area of approximately 158 acres that was sold to developers in 2004 The economic downturn has slowed development in these areas The district completed a comprehensive review of all district facilities and in October 2008 a Steering Committee made recommendations to the board for capital improvements to existing facilities and replacement of seven schools over the next ten years These recommendations led to a capital improvements levy and a bond issue that was placed on the ballot in March 2009 Both ballot measures were not successful in March The board determined to re-run only the capital improvements levy in November 2009, which the voters approved The School Impact Fee Ordinances adopted by King County, the City of Auburn and the City of Kent provide for the assessment of impact fees to assist in meeting some of the fiscal impact incurred by a District experiencing growth and development Section VII sets forth the proposed school impact fees for single family and multifamily dwelling units The student generation factors have been generated using the students who actually attend school in the Auburn School District from single family and multifamily developments constructed in the last five years The method of collecting the data is with the use of GIS mapping software, data from King County and Pierce County GIS, and to integrate the mapping with student data from the district's student data system This method gives the District actual student generation numbers for each grade span for identified developments This data is contained in Appendix A 3 3 Auburn School District No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2010 through 2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1� CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CHANGES FROM 2009 TO 2010 Listed below is a summary level outline of the changes from the 2009 Capital Facilities Plan that are a part of the 2010 Plan The changes are noted by Section for ease of reference Section I Executive Summary A Updated to reflect new information within the Plan B Summary level list of changes from previous year Section 11 Enrollment Projections Updated projections See Appendices A 1 &A 2. Section III Standard of Service A Increase of 1 Full Day Kindergarten classroom at elementary level B Increase of 2 resource rooms at middle school level C Reduction of 1 resource room at elementary level Section IV Inventory of Facilities Updated to include TAP facility for students with special needs at Auburn High School Section V Pupil Capacity Updated to include TAP facility for students with special needs at Auburn High School 4 Aubum School District No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2010 through 2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Section VII Impact Fees CHANGES TO IMPACT FEE DATA ELEMENTS 2009 to 2010 CPF CPF DATA ELEMENTS 2009 2010 EXPLANATION Student Generation Factors Single Family Consistent with King County Ordinance 11621, Elementary 03200 03080 Student Generation Factors are calculated Mid School 0 1520 0 1470 by the school district based on district Sr High 01580 0 1770 records of average actual student generation Multi-Family rates for new developments constructed Elementary 00790 00860 over the last five years Mid School 00340 00380 Sr High 00420 00310 School Construction Costs Elementary $21,750,000 $21,750,000 Middle School $42,500,000 $42,500,000 Site Acquisition Costs Cost per acre $286,006 $290,381 Updated estimates on land costs Area Cost Allowance Boec $174 26 $180 17 Updated to projected SPI schedule Match % -State 59 17% 60 23% Updated to current SPI schedule Match % - District 40 83% 39 77% Computed District Average AV Single Family $316,271 $254,009 Updated from March 2010 King County Dept of Assessments data Multi-Family $85,729 $76,573 Updated from March 2010 King County Dept of Assessments data using weighted average Debt Sery Tax Rate $1 67 $0 82 Current Fiscal Year GO Bond Int Rate 4 99% 4 33% Current Rate (Bond Buyers 20 Index 3-10) Section Vill Appendices Appendix A 1 - Updated enrollment projections from October 1, 2009 Appendix A 2 - Updated enrollment projections with anticipated buildout schedule Appendix A 3- Student Generation Survey March 2010 5 s L Auburn School District No 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2010 through 2016 �4 Section II Enrollment Projections s Aubum School District No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2010through 2016 ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS The Auburn School District uses a modified cohort survival model to project future enrollment for all of the District's operations Table II 1 is an extract from the comprehensive projection model found in Appendix A 2 titled "CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Enrollment Projections" This Table shows the anticipated enrollment for the next six years based on the previous 6 year history of the District under the assumptions set forth in the comprehensive projections, Appendix A 1, and the projection for additional students generated from new developments in the district as shown in Appendix A 2 TABLE ASD ENROLLMENT 11.1 PROJECTIONS March 2010 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 GRADE Actual Projected Projected Projected Protected Projected Projected KDG 1032 1069 1106 1147 1190 1231 1271 1 1033 1088 1125 1167 1210 1252 1292 2 998 1054 1110 1152 1194 1236 1277 3 993 1021 1078 1138 1181 1222 1263 4 1073 1036 1064 1126 1187 1229 1271 5 1030 1109 1072 1106 1168 1228 1270 K - 5 6159 6378 6555 T 6-836 7130 7398 7644 6 1040 1047 1127 1094 1129 1190 1250 7 1125 1064 1072 1157 1125 1159 1220 8 1031 1153 1093 1105 1191 1159 1192 6 - 8 3196 3265 3291 3356 3446 3508 3662 9 1244 1271 1396 1344 1362 1450 1420 10 1277 1249 1276 1407 1357 1372 1460 11 1303 1240 1211 1244 1375 1321 1335 12 1410 1314 1250 1226 1259 1387 1332 9 - 12 5234 5074 5133 5222 5352 5531 5548 TOTALS 14589 14717 14979 15414 15928 16436 16854 GRADES:K-12 Actual Pro ected Projected Pro ected Pro ected Pro ected Projected K-5 w/K 5643 5844 6002 6262 6535 6782 7008 3196 3265 3291 3356 3446 3508 3662 5234 5074 5133 5222 5352 5531 5548 2 w/K 14073 14183 14426 14841 15333 15821 16218 Note The district is currently operating Full Day Kindergarten in eight schools and includes two state funded Full Day Kindergarten at two additional elementary schools 7 Auburn School District No 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2010 through 2016 Section III Standard of Service Aubum School District No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2010 through 2016 STANDARD OF SERVICE The School Impact Fee Ordinances adopted by King County, the City of Auburn and the City of Kent indicate that each school district must establish a "Standard of Service"in order to ascertain the overall capacity to house its projected student population The Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage "capacity"guidelines for computing state funding support The fundamental purpose of the SPI guidelines is to provide a vehicle to equitably distribute state matching funds for school construction projects By default these guidelines have been used to benchmark the district's capacity to house its student population The SPI guidelines do not make adequate provision for local district program needs, facility configurations, emerging educational reform, or the dynamics of each student's educational program The Auburn School District Standard of Service addresses those local considerations that require space in excess of the SPI guidelines The effect on the space requirements for both permanent and relocatable facilities is shown below for each grade articulation pattern Conditions that may result in potential space needs are provided for information purposes without accompanying computations OVERVIEW The Auburn School District operates fourteen elementary schools housing 6,159 students in grades K through 5 For Kindergarten students, 682 of the 1032 attend 1/2 days throughout the year, and 5127 students grades 1 through 5, plus 350 kindergartners, attend on a full day basis When converted to a full time equivalent the K-5 enrollment is 5,741 The four middle schools house 3,198 students in grades 6 through 8 The District operates three comprehensive senior high schools and one alternative high school housing 5,234 students in grades 9 through 12 CLASS SIZE The number of pupils per classroom determines the number of classrooms required to house the student population Specialists create additional space needs, for class sizes are subject to collective bargaining Changes to class size agreements can have significant impact on available space The current pupil/teacher limit across all elementary programs is an average of 26 5 students per teacher Consistent with this staffing limit, room capacities are set at 26 5 students per room at grades K- 5 At grades 6 - 12 the limit is set at 30 pupils per room The SPI space allocation for each grade articulation level, less the computed reduction for the Auburn School District Standard of Service, determines the District's capacity to house projected pupil populations These reductions are shown below by grade articulation level ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS STRUCTURED LEARNING FOR DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates a structured learning program for students with moderate to severe disabilities at the elementary school level which currently uses ten classrooms to provide for 105 students The housing requirements for this program are provided for in the SPI space guidelines No loss of capacity is expected unless population with disabilities grows at a disproportionate rate compared to total elementary population ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR The Auburn School District operates an adaptive behavior program for students with behavior disabilities at the elementary school level The program uses two classrooms to provide for 20 students The housing requirements for this program exceed the SPI space allocations by two classrooms Loss of Permanent Capacity 2 rooms @ 26 5 each = (53) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26 5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (53) all 9 Auburn School District No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2010 through 2016 STANDARD OF SERVICE SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS L The Auburn School District operates a resource room program at the elementary level for special education students requiring instruction to address their specific disabilities Fourteen standard classrooms are required to house this program The housing requirements for this program exceed the SPI space guidelines by seven standard classrooms The loss of capacity is expected as growth In program Is larger than the total elementary population Loss of Permanent Capacity 7 rooms @ 26 5 each = (186) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26 5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (186) NATIVE AMERICAN RESOURCE ROOM The Auburn School District operates one resource room to support the education of Native American students at the elementary level One standard classroom is fully dedicated to serve these students Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 room @ 26 5 each = (27) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26 5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (27) HEAD START The Auburn School District operates a Head Start program for approximately 120 youngsters in six sections of 1/2 day in length The program is housed at three elementary schools and utilizes three standard elementary classrooms and auxiliary office spaces The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines Loss of Permanent Capacity 3 rooms @ 26 5 each = (80) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26 5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (80) EARLY CHILDHOOD SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates a pre-school program for young children with disabilities below age five This program Is housed at eight different elementary schools and currently uses eleven standard classrooms The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines Loss of Permanent Capacity 11 rooms @ 26 5 each = (292) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26 5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (292) READING LABS The Auburn School District operates a program for students needing remediation and additional language arts instruction These programs utilize non-standard classroom spaces if available in each elementary school Four elementary schools do not have non-standard rooms available, thus they are housed in a standard classroom The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 26 5 each = (106) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26 5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (106) 10 Aubum School District No 408 , CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2010 through 2016 STANDARD OF SERVICE MUSIC ROOMS The district elementary music programs require one acoustically modified classroom at each elementary school for music Instruction The housing requirements are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines Loss of Permanent Capacity 14 rooms @ 26 5 each = (371) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26 5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (371) ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at the elementary school level for students learning English as a second language This program requires fourteen standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines Loss of Permanent Capacity 14 rooms @ 26 5 each = (371) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26 5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (371) SECOND GRADE TOSA PROGRAM The Auburn School District provides a TOSA reading specialist program for eight highly impacted elementary schools This pullout model provides direct instruction to students who are not at grade level and do not receive other services This program requires eight standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 rooms @ 26 5 each = (212) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26 5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (212) ELEMENTARY LEARNING SPECIALIST PROGRAM The Auburn School District provides a learning specialist program to increase literacy skills for first and second graders This program model has been created from the 1-728 funds and currently has the specialist going into existing teacher classrooms, as well as pulling out students into designated classrooms The district is utilizing classrooms at all fourteen elementary schools Loss of Permanent Capacity 14 rooms @ 26 5 each = (371) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26 5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (371) FULL DAY KINDERGARTEN The Auburn School District provides Full-Day Kindergarten programs to increase academic skills for kindergarten students This program model has been created from tuition, ARRA funds and currently has two schools receiving state funding for 2009-10 school year The district is utilizing fourteen classrooms at nine of the fourteen elementary schools Housing requirements exceed the OSPI space guidelines for this program by seven classrooms Loss of Permanent Capacity 7 rooms @ 26 5 each = (186) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26 5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (186) 11 Aubum School District No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2010through 2016 STANDARD OF SERVICE MIDDLE SCHOOLS SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program for each grade at the middle school level This is to accommodate special education students needing remedial instruction to address their specific disabilities Eleven classrooms are required at the middle school level to provide for approximately 350 students ' The housing requirements for this program are not entirely provided for in the SPI space guidelines ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District offers a self-contained program for students with moderate to severe behavior diabilities The program is housed at one of the middle schools and uses one classroom The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space allocations STRUCTURED LEARNING CENTER AND DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates four structured learning classrooms at the middle school level for students with moderate to severe disabilities and one developmentally disabled classroom for students with profound disabilities Two of the four classrooms for this program are provided for in the SPI space allocations Loss of Permanent Capacity 2 rooms @ 26 5 each = (53) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26 5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (53) MIDDLE SCHOOL COMPUTER LABS The Auburn School District operates a minimum of one computer lab at each middle school This program utilizes a standard classroom per middle school The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 30 each = (120) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (120) ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE i The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at the middle school level for students learning English as a second language This program requires four standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 30 each = (120) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (120) ROOM UTILIZATION The Auburn School District provides a comprehensive middle school program that includes ' elective options in special interest areas Facilities to accommodate special interest activities are not amenable to standard classroom usage The district averages 95% utilization of all available teaching stations SPI Report#3 dated 11/20/09 identifies 148 teaching stations available in the mid-level facilities The utilization pattern results in a loss of approximately 8 teaching stations Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 rooms @ 30 each = (240) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (240) 12 Aubum School District No 408 ' CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2010 through 2016 STANDARD OF SERVICE SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS SENIOR HIGH COMPUTER LABS The Auburn School District operates two computer labs at each of the senior high schools This program utilizes two standard classrooms at comprehensive high schools and one at West Auburn The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines ` Loss of Permanent Capacity 7 rooms @ 30 each = (210) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (210) ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at three comprehensive high schools for students learning English as a second language This program requires three standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines Loss of Permanent Capacity 3 rooms @ 30 each = (90) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (90) STRUCTURED LEARNING CENTER PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates six structured learning center classrooms for 53 students with moderate to severe disabilities This program requires two standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines, Loss of Permanent Capacity 2 rooms @ 30 each = (60) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (60) SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program at the senior high level for special education students requiring instruction to address their specific learning disabilities The current senior high school program requires eleven classrooms to provide for approximately 370 students The SPI space guidelines provide for one of the eleven teaching stations Loss of Permanent Capacity 10 rooms @ 30 each = (300) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (300) PERFORMING ARTS CENTERS Auburn High School includes 25,000 square feet used exclusively for a Performing Arts Center The SPI Inventory includes this space when computing unhoused student capacity This space was not intended for nor is it usable for classroom instruction It was constructed to provide a community center for the performing arts Using SPI capacity guidelines, 25,000 square feet computes to 208 unhoused students or 8 33 classrooms Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 33 rooms @ 30 each = (250) 13 Auburn School District No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2010 through 2016 STANDARD OF SERVICE ROOM UTILIZATION The Auburn School District provides a comprehensive high school program that Includes numerous elective options in special Interest areas Facilities to accommodate special Interest activities are not amenable to standard classroom usage The district averages 95% utilization of all available teaching stations There are 185 teaching stations available In the senior high facilities The utilization pattern results In a loss of approximately 10 teaching stations Loss of Permanent Capacity 10 rooms @ 30 each = (300) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (300) STANDARD OF SERVICE COMPUTED TOTALS ELEMENTARY Loss of Permanent Capacity = (2,253) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (2,253) MIDDLE SCHOOL Loss of Permanent Capacity = (533) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (533) SENIOR HIGH Loss of Permanent Capacity = (1,210) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (1,210) TOTAL Loss of Permanent Capacity= (3,995) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (3,995) 14 Auburn School District No 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2010 through 2016 Section IV f Inventory of Facilities , 1 Auburn School District No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN ' 2010through 2016 INVENTORY OF FACILITIES Table IV.I shows the current inventory of permanent district facilities and their OSPI rated capacities. ' Table IV 2 shows the number and location of each portable unit by school The district uses relocatable facilities to ' 1 provide interim housing in school attendance areas uniquely impacted by increasing school populations that would otherwise require continual redistricting 2 make space available for changing program requirements and offerings determined by unique student needs, and 3. provide housing to cover district needs until permanent facilities can be financed and constructed Relocatable facilities are deemed to be interim, stop gap measures that often place undesirable stress on existing physical plants Core facilities (i e gymnasiums, restrooms, kitchens, labs, lockers, libraries, etc ) are not of sufficient size or quantity to handle the increased school population served by adding relocatable classrooms. Table Permanent Facilities District School Facilities IV 1 @ OSPI Rated Capacity (November 2009) Building Capacity Acres Address Elementary Schools Washington Elementary 486 540 20 E Street Northeast,Auburn WA,98002 Terminal Park Elementary 408 670 1101 D Street Southeast,Auburn WA,98002 Dick Scobee Elementary 477 1050 1031 14th Street Northeast, Auburn WA,98002 Pioneer Elementary 441 830 2301 M Street Southeast,Auburn WA,98002 Chinook Elementary 440 8 75 3502 Auburn Way South, Auburn WA,98092 Lea Hill Elementary 450 1000 30908 124th Avenue Southeast,Auburn WA,98092 Gildo Rev Elementary 551 1000 1005 37th Street Southeast, Auburn WA,98002 Evergreen Heights Elem 456 809 5602 South 316th,Auburn WA,98001 AL ac Elementary 497 1060 310 Milwaukee Boulevard North, Pacific WA,98047 Lake View Elementary 559 1640 16401 Southeast 318th Street,Auburn WA,98092 Hazelwood Elementary 580 1267 11815 Southeast 304th Street, Auburn WA,98092 Ilalko Elementary 585 1200 301 Oravetz Place Southeast.Auburn WA,98092 Lakeland Hills Elementary 594 1200 1020 Evergreen Way SE,Auburn WA,98092 Arthur Jacobsen Elementary 614 1000 29205 132" Street SE,Auburn, WA 98092 ELEM CAPACITY 7138 Middle Schools Cascade Middle School 829 1730 1015 24th Street Northeast, Auburn WA,98002 OI m is Middle School 921 1740 1825 K Street Southeast,Auburn WA,98002 Rainier Middle School 843 2633 30620 116th Avenue Southeast, Auburn WA,98092 Mt Baker Middle School 837 3088 620 37th Street Southeast, Auburn WA, 98002 MS CAPACITY 3,430 Senior High Schools i West Auburn High School 233 5 10 401 West Main Street, Auburn WA, 98001 Auburn Senior High 2,101 1860 800 Fourth Street Northeast,Auburn WA,98002 Auburn Riverside HS 1,387 3300 501 Oravetz Road, Auburn WA,98092 Auburn Mountamview HS 1,443 4000 28900 124`h Ave SE,Auburn, WA 98092 SH CAPACITY 5,164 TOTAL CAPACITY 15,732 ' 16 Auburn School District No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2009 through 2015 ' INVENTORY OF FACILITIES TABLE TEMPORARYIRELOCATABLE IV.2 FACILITIES INVENTORY (March 2010) Elementary Location 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 Washington 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Terminal Park 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Dick Scobee 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Pioneer 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Chinook 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Lea Hill 5 5 5 2 2 2 2 Gildo Rey 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 Evergreen Heights 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 ' Alpac 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Lake View 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Hazelwood 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ilalko 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Lakeland Hills Elementary 2 2 2 4 4 4 4 Arthur Jacobsen Elementary 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 10 , TOTAL UNITS 32 32 32 33 33 33 33 TOTAL CAPACITY 848 848 848 875 875 875 875 Middle School Location 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 , Cascade 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 Olympic 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 Rainier 5 5 5 7 7 8 8 Mt Baker 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 TOTAL UNITS 13 13 13 15 19 20 20 TOTAL CAPACITY 390 390 390 450 570 600 600 Sr High School Location 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 West Auburn 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 ' Auburn High School 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Auburn High School-*TAP 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Auburn Riverside 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 Auburn Mountainview 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 , TOTAL UNITS 26 26 26 26 27 27 27 TOTAL CAPACITY 780 780 780 780 810 810 810 *TAP-Transition Assistance Program for 18-21 year old students with special needs COMBINED TOTAL UNITS 71 71 71 74 79 80 80 COMBINED TOTAL CAPACITY 2,018 2,018 2,018 2,105 2,255 2,285 2,285 17 , I , ' Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan ' 2010 through 2016 1 ' Section V Pupil Capacity 1 Auburn School District No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2010 through 2016 PUPIL CAPACITY While the Auburn School District uses the SPI inventory of permanent facilities as the data from which to determine space needs, the District's educational program requires more space than that , provided for under the formula This additional square footage is converted to numbers of pupils in Section III, Standard of Service The District's capacity is adjusted to reflect the need for additional space to house its programs Changes in the capacity of the district recognize new unfunded ' facilities The combined effect of these adjustments is shown on Line B In Tables V 1 and V 2 below Table V 1 shows the Distict's capacity with relocatable units included and Table V 2 without these units Table V.1 ' Capacity WITH relocatables 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 A SPI Capacity 15,732 15,732 15,732 15,732 15,732 15,732 16,532 , A 1 SPI Capacity-New Elem 585 1/ A 2 SPI Capacity- New MS 800 B Capacity Adjustments 1,977 (1,977) 1,977 1,891 (1,741) (1,711 1,711 ' C Net Capacity 13,755 13,755 13,755 13,841 13,991 14,821 15,406 D ASD Enrollment 14,589 14,717 14,979 15,414 15,928 16,436 16,854 ' 3/ E ASD Surplus/Deficit (834) (962) (1,224) (1,573) (1,937) (1,615) (1,448) CAPACITY ADJUSTMENTS Include Relocatable 2,018 2,018 2,018 2,105 2,255 2,285 2,285 ' 21 Exclude SOS (pg 14) (3,995 3,995 3,995 3,995 3,995) (3,995) (3,995 Total Adjustments (1,977) (1,977) (1,977) (1,891) (1,741) (1,711) (1,711) Table V.2 ' Capacity ' WITHOUT relocatables 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 A SPI Capacity 15,732 15,732 15,732 15,732 15,732 15,732 16,532 A 1 SPI Capacity-New Elem 585 1/ A 2 SPI Capacity- New MS 800 , B Capacity Adjustments 3,995 3,995 3,995 3,995) 3,995 (3,995)_ (3,995 C Net Capacity 11,737 11,737 11,737 11,737 11,737 12,537 13,122 ' D ASD Enrollment 14,589 14,717 14,979 15,414 15,928 16,436 16,854 3/ E ASD Surplus/Deficit (2,852) (2,980) (3,242) (3,678) (4,192) (3,900) (3,732) CAPACITY ADJUSTMENTS ' 2/ Exclude SOS (pg 14) (3,995) 3,995 3,995 3,995) 3,995 3,995 3,995) Total Adjustments (3,995) (3,995) (3,995) (3,995) (3,995) (3,995) (3,995) 1/ New facilities shown in 2014-15 and 2015-16 are not funded under the current Capital Facilities Plan 2/ The Standard of Service represents 25 39%of SPI capacity When new facilities are added the Standard of Service computations are decreased to 23 34% of SPI capacity ' 3/ Students beyond the capacity are accomodated in other spaces(commons, library,theater, shared teaching space) 19 Auburn School District No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2010 through 2016 ' PERMANENT FACILITIES PUPIL CAPACITY @ SPI Rated Capacity (March 2010) ' A Elementary Schools Building 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 Washington 486 486 486 486 486 486 486 ' Terminal Park 408 408 408 408 408 408 408 Dick Scobee 477 477 477 477 477 477 477 Pioneer 441 441 441 441 441 441 441 ' Chinook 440 440 440 440 440 440 440 Lea Hill 450 450 450 450 450 450 450 Gildo Rey 551 551 551 551 551 551 551 ' Evergreen Height 456 45 45 45 45 45 456 Alpac 497 497 497 497 497 497 497 Lake View 559 559 559 559 559 559 559 ' Hazelwood 580 580 580 580 580 580 580 Ilalko 585 585 585 585 585 585 585 Lakeland Hills 594 594 594 594 594 594 594 Arthur Jacobsen 614 614 614 614 614 614 614 Elementary#15 1 1 1 1 585 ELEM CAPACITY 7,138 7,138 7,138 7,138 7,138 7,138 7,723 B Middle Schools Building 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 Cascade 829 829 829 829 829 829 829 Olympic 921 921 921 921 921 921 921 Rainier 843 843 843 843 843 843 843 Mt Baker 837 837 837 837 837 837 837 Middle School#5 800 800 MS CAPACITY 3,430 3,430 3,430 3,430 3,430 4,230 4,230 C Senior High Schools ' Building 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 West Auburn 233 233 233 233 233 233 233 Auburn 2,101 2,101 2,101 2,101 2,101 2,101 2,101 ' Auburn Riverside 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 Auburn Mountainvlew 1,443 1,443 1,443 1,443 1,443 1,443 1,443 SH CAPACITY 5,164 5,164 5,164 5,164 5,164 5,164 5,164 COMBINED CAPACITY 15,732 15,732 15,732 15,732 15,732 16,532 17,117 ' 20 Auburn School District No 408 , Capital Facilities Plan 2010 through 2016 ' Section VI Capital Construction Plan Aubum School District No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN ' 2010through 2016 CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN The formal process used by the Board to address current and future facility needs began in 1974 with the formation of a community wide citizens committee The result of this committee's work was published in the document titled 'Guidelines for Development' In 1985 the Board formed a second Ad Hoc citizens committee to pick up from the work of the first and address the ' needs of the District for subsequent years The work of this committee was published in the document titled 'Directions for the Nineties.' In 1995 the Board commissioned a third Ad Hoc citizens committee to make recommendations for Improvements to the District's programs and physical facilities The committee recommendations are published in the document titled 'Education Into The Twenty-First Century- -A Community Involved ' ' The 1995 Ad Hoc committee recommended the District develop plans for the Implementation, funding, and deployment of technology throughout the District's programs The 1996 Bond proposition provided funding to enhance the capacity of each facility to accommodate ' technological applications The 1998 Capital Levy provided funding to further deploy technology at a level sufficient to support program requirements in every classroom and department In 2005 a replacement technology levy was approved to continue to support technology across all facets of the District's teaching, learning and operations. ' In addition to the technology needs of the District the Ad Hoc committee recognized the District must prepare for continued student enrollment growth As stated in their report, "the District must pursue an appropriate high school site as soon as possible " The Ad Hoc recommendation Included commentary that the financing should be timed to maintain consistent rates of assessment A proposition was approved by the voters on April 28, 1998 that provided $8,000,000 over six years to address some of the technology needs of the District, and $5,000,000 to provide funds to acquire school sites During the 1997-98 school year a Joint District Citizen's Ad Hoc Committee was appointed by the Auburn and Dieringer School Boards to make recommendations on how best to serve the school population from an area that includes a large development known as Lakeland South Lakeland South at that time was immediately adjacent to the southern boundary of the Auburn School District On June 16, 1998 the Ad Hoc Committee presented its recommendation at a joint meeting of the Auburn and Dieringer Boards Of Directors On June 22, 1998 the Auburn School Board adopted Resolution No 933 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries of the District in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation On June 23, 1998 the Dieringer School Board adopted a companion Resolution No 24-97-98 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation These actions resulted in the transfer of an area from Dieringer to Auburn containing most of the Lakeland South development and certain other undeveloped properties Development in this area is progressing at an aggressive rate In April of 2002, the Board formed a fifth citizen's Ad Hoc committee to address the following two items and make recommendations to the board in the Fall of 2002 a A review of the conclusion and recommendations of 1985 and 1995 Ad Hoc Committees related to accommodating high school enrollment growth This included the review of possible financing plans for new facilities b Develop recommendations for accommodating high school enrollment growth for the next 10 years if a new senior high school is not built ' 22 Aubum School District No 408 ' CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2010 through 2016 CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN This committee recommended the board place the high school on the ballot for the fifth time in , February 2003 The February election approved the new high school at 68 71% yes votes The school opened in the Fall of 2005 In the Fall of 2003 the school board directed the administration to begin the planning and design ' for Elementary#13 and Elementary#14 In the Fall of 2004, the Auburn School Board passed Resolution No 1054 to place two elementary schools on the ballot in February 2005 The , voters approved the ballot measure in February of 2005 at 64 72% Lakeland Hills Elementary (Elementary#13) opened in the Fall of 2006 Arthur Jacobsen Elementary (Elementary#14) is located in the Lea Hill area on a 10 acre site and opened in the Fall of 2007 These two ' elementary schools were built to accommodate the housing growth in Lakeland Hills and Lea Hill areas of the school district In the 2004-05 school year, the Board convened a sixth Citizen's Ad Hoc committee to again ' study and make recommendations about the future impacts in the District One of the areas of study was the need for New Facilities and Modernization The committee made a number of ' recommendations including school size, the need for a new middle school, and to begin a capital improvements program to modernize or replace facilities based upon criterion During the 2005-06 school year, a Joint District Citizen's Ad Hoc Committee was appointed by the Auburn and Kent School Boards to make recommendations on how best to serve the school population that will come from an area that includes a number of projected developments in the north Auburn valley On May 17, 2006 the Ad Hoc Committee presented its recommendation at ' a joint meeting of the Auburn and Kent Boards of Directors On June 14, 2006 the Kent School Board adopted Resolution No 1225 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries of the District in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation On June 26, 2006 the Auburn School Board adopted a companion Resolution No 1073 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation These actions resulted in the transfer of an area from the Kent School District to the Auburn School District effective September 29, 2006 In October of 2008, after two years of review and study, a Steering Committee made , recommendations to the school board regarding the capital improvements program to modernize or replace facilities as recommended by the 2004-05 Citizen's Ad Hoc Committee These recommendations, based on specific criteria, led to the school board placing a school improvement bond and capital improvements levy on the ballot in March 2009 Voters did not , approve either measures that would have updated 24 facilities and replaced three aging schools The board decided to place only a six-year Capital Levy on the ballot in November of 2009, which passed at 55 17% The levy will fund $46 4 million of needed improvement ' projects at 24 sites over the next seven school years. Planning for the replacement of aging schools has started with educational specifications and schematic design process beginning in 2010 A future bond issue will be necessary to fund these projects ' The Special Education Transition Facility opened in February of 2010 This facility is designed for students with disabilities that are 18 to 21 years old ' IN 2009, the school district acquired a site for a future middle school in 2009 and will need to consider possibilities for a site for elementary school #15 23 , Auburn School District No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2010 through 2016 CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN The District is projecting 2265 additional students within the six year period Including the Lakeland, Lea Hill, and north Auburn valley areas This increase in student population will require the acquisition of new middle school and new elementary school sites and construction of a middle school and elementary school during the six year window. Based upon the District's capacity data and enrollment projections, as well as the student ' generation data included in Appendix A 3, the District has determined that approximately eighty- six percent of the capacity Improvements are necessary to serve the students generated from new development, with the remaining additional capacity required to address existing need The table below illustrates the current capital construction plan for the next six years The exact timelines are wholly dependent on the rate of growth in the school age population and passage ' of bond Issues and/or capital Improvement levies ' 2010-16 Capital Construction Plan March 2010 ' Projected Fund Project Timelines Project Funded Cost Source 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-13 13-14 14-15 15-16 All Facilities- 2006 Technology Yes $12,000,000 6 Year XX XX XX Modernization Cap Levy Portables Yes $1,200,000 ImpactFees XX XX XX XX XX XX XX Property Purchase Impact New Elementary No $3,500,000 Fees XX XX XX XX Multiple Facility Yes $46,400,000 Capital XX XX XX XX XX XX XX 1/ Improvements Levy Bond XX XX XX ' 1/ Middle School #5 No $42,500,000 Impact Fee plan const open Bond XX XX XX 1/ Elementary 415 No $21,750,000 Impact Fee plan const open Replacement of three aging No $239,000,000 Bond Issue XX XX XX XX XX XX XX 1/ schools 1/ These funds may be secured through local bond issues,sale of real property,impact fees,and state matching funds The District currently is not eligible for state assistance at the elementary school level for new construction The district is eligible for stale matching funds for modernization ' 24 Auburn School District No 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2010 through 2016 ' Section VII ■ Impact Fees 1 t t >. _ O (V T T 01 nE _ N tD N OI y (1 0 0 0 a 0 d' y N O O LL N M O �' O LL 61 N n N U � ° w U 0)rnuaN U 3rovv � T T T T m pp t6 00 N (E6 O o] OOi 00 0 LL 0 0 0 p N LL r O p h y LL OO M y LL c0 N (O h ' �j o 0 o c U °� o N U °� U ° C r v N Ol y� Fy fA tq m m N P, (o (n co (n va Vi b9 T T T T E o 0 0 E o 0 o E o 0 o E o (D 0 m COm (o co c (o cD co m e m LL W ("� ("J N LL O (") M LL O [+] ch LL W ch (7 _ 0 0 0 _ O O O _ 0 0 0 _ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 = O = 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 LL . LL N LL LL C 0 0 0 0 o o ° o 0 Z c E ° a) E ° c E c E 0 m 0 0 0 O C@ O O O O O O O O O O O O o� n n LL ° m a n LL o m n n ° co n n o C7 M y n_ (7 o It oa 5 'ono N Z W c a (n 2 (n Cl) (fA U N (n (n N (n (n y O p J (m ~ ~ Z o O T Q LL O LL O co p V `J O N N N O' N N N m \° o o N ci o W m o' W (n o' ` t o L LL (� o 0 o O c co co co V (n r> LL c� ch ° o a ,`f 2 c E m rn rn rn 2 0 E@ m o 0 o c w 0 N N N J o ` LL U o WO a o 0 0 o WO �' ' N _ (i in W d ~ W F ~ Q Q d K X x 2U W o W o m ' N a u a u x N V 0 C> 0 O LL U N p 0 to LL U N 0 0 C LL O O M L N (, Q EA Vi b9 V N !n co 1° („) m (o N M m y U) 00 m LL W O LL yx O m Q DO LL N N h N N 1� (o O O ~ (n W LL 0 o 0 2 o o d Y x (n o 0 _ o 0 0 = N o o W (n ° m T 2 d u o u� o o 5 o o ° o 0 0 U n �n U m mU o o y3 R x ° ° co ao ao o p ¢ N LL N a LL i» x m L co U = U v> e» = U W o° V 3 x U U — D U VlL wh RWo Q 0� N i ¢t m m 2 i O ° in o (� uj CL o f W E E :6 C E ` Ems = g E �o Ems = ¢ E E (n = o m 2 mu LL w2i (n 4 (° � w � (`o emu°. w � 0 y (i whin � � � � \ / F- a / ; \ \\ z 0 § ) k ) � ° \ } � � \ _ / E { z cn 0 - mLn ! - u ; < / \ ) J w / a k04 aLL \ � � cn < � LL g $ - � (D \ x \ � } 0 ( \ G f ) 0 0 ( k Lu 0 a) \ / Cl) ) 2 \ ) \ \ < < � 0 � [ $ $ \ a ` 32 ) i § 3 ) L \ $ ƒ k \ $ ( � � \ \ i \ o , ± e > - : ± a , 3 « / - 75 2 da - ± f / ik } \ / sf� ) r ) k LU f ` E � � i oLL C75a- w m ) ! � S � � � ' rn rn v m r L O N N O CD o o .�- M o N U N aO 7 _ O M O 7 O m N a (ID m O N N cD U) NMN- c00 M cco m 60? 7 U } J m QU OJ cO O O cND y 0 o - ° . r N o ❑ N V LL -p O O O M O N c cO N 7 c�D M O O N n co M N O O J O o O L M co (00_ r O Cl) O O O 6 co 09 EA O 69 O M 64 (0 Q ' O O O T tD O L O co CO 7 O c o ° N o y c0 N p coI] N CG O N cD u) N 7 c(D N O O N r U') co M QJ N W Y O N N OM e- cOD n O M O 0 0 oVT- 'T W O n M FA @ 0 C O O1 N n O O NdJ W O e o 0 7 N o Q LL o _ M O V O N N a cM0 M Cl) co m C O N r O M N O O O oO O O (n 0 0 M M c0 r M cp M N EA It U M 69 6s 69 69 O G � C a — } J Z Q v I� O O N N CDM o LU r o o V o N ❑ ro a of O J LL 0 0 M O N M cO N 7 co M O O N r- j C O M cn O v d �° o m N M m rn z W o z ' a u — N M L N_ ❑ D) d) _ N U1 N CO � O aa O Q L E O O O O O a0 ° M r L% N o N U p N U LL O O M c0 O O N O N cc cN") OM N 1� O MO m V N N M ti c J W Y O N N M c00 M V3 7 d U N NM- m E Q 3 F N 3 d Q Q Ol C 0)' U m m o o m o rn con C p p N o @ U1 - to O O U p U U O O Q) O .p LL LL C Q u L a N m M o @ m U ' m m z H� o o n m E x LU 0 o M m NO N E o u" a J U N LL U N O L O N N N O uNi U O y W @ LL U 3 O@ n 'O ` N Q@ N L@ 0 0 00 0 W U d D N O H > > @ L O N E } N N O ` _ O LL C y@ N O@ p� O N -p N N @ C@ p a Q 'o co E W a S 'o o m m m o a W N o D z M c oo o g m `m m Q@ w U @ N m 0 m o LL LL ? .p o. a m } m T U U) yY w o na m m dda EtLK o e O m o K o `o m a al v1 a U `_ 0 a H Q M N r� 750 m �_ -�°� O� o a n E E E o 0 o E O rn Q W 2i Q (D cC Q co U) U) a LL LL U Y U U ,M V 21 h N O p ayi m m O r y y m ° a U m@ m = = -moo =3 $ � � y nCD 0a @ ; x a o o `o W °- LL u E m o N p L` E aLL o 2 O c @ m F @@ K LL U O (n (n U N Q L o o > 00 0 ' N LL LL n Q U n - ' Y L L a E a N Q @ 3 3 @ E �° H Q aui a 0 E E u m E E m o o a inzz H � rn CT) 0- a° cnm 2 0 ❑ C� Auburn School District No 408 ' Capital Facilities Plan 2010 through 2016 ' Section VIII ' Appendix ' Appendix A.1 - Student Enrollment Protections Appendix A.2 - CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Enrollment Projections ' Appendix A.3 - Student Generation Survey ' Appendix A.1 - Student Enrollment Projections Auburn School District #408 Student Enrollment Projections October 2009 , Introduction The projective techniques give some consideration to historical and current data as a basis for ' forecasting the future In addition, the `projector' must make certain assumptions about the operant variables within the data being used These assumptions are "judgmental"by definition Forecasting can be defined as the extrapolation or logical extension from history to the future, or from the known to the unknown The attached tabular data reviews the history of student enrollment, sets out some quantitative assumptions, and provides projections based on these numerical factors The projection logic does not attempt to weigh the individual sociological, psychological, economic, and political factors that are present in any demographic analysis and projection The logic embraces the assumptions that whatever these individual factors have been in the past are present today, and will be in the future It further moderates the impact of singular factors by averaging data over thirteen years and six years respectively The results provide a trend, which reflects along(13-year) and a short (6-year)base from which to extrapolate Two methods of estimating the number of kindergarten students have been used The first uses the t average increase or decrease over the past 13 and 6-year time frame and adds it to each succeeding year The second derives what the average percentage Auburn kindergartners have been of live births in King County for the past 5 years and uses this to project the subsequent four years. The degree to which the actuals deviate from the projections can only be measured after the fact This deviation provides a point of departure to evaluate the effectiveness of the assumptions and logic being used to calculate future projections Monitoring deviation is critical to the viability and credibility of the projections derived by these techniques Tables Table I—Thirteen Year Historry of October I Enrollments—page 3 The data shown in this table is the baseline information used to project future enrollment This data , shows the past record of enrollment in the district on October 1 of each year Table 2—Historical Factors Used in Protections -page 4 This table shows the three basic factors derived from the data in Table 1. These factors have been used in the subsequent projections The three factors are 1. Factor 1—Average Pupil Change Between Grade Levels This factor is sometimes referred to as the "holding power"or"cohort survival" It is a measure of the number of pupils gamed or lost as they move from one grade level to the next 2. Factor 2 -Average Pupil Change by Grade Level This factor is the average change at each grade level over the 13 or 6-year period 3. Factor 3—Auburn School District Kindergarten Enrollment as a Function of King County Live Births. This factor calculates what percent each kindergarten class was of the King County live births in the 5 previous years From this information has been extrapolated the kindergarten pupils expected for the next 4 years 1 Table 3—Proiechon Models—pages 5-13 This set of tables utilizes the above mentioned variables and generates several projections The models are explained briefly below. ❑ Table 3 13 (pg 5)—shows a projection based on the 13-year average gam in kindergarten (Factor 2) and the 13-year average change between grade levels (Factor 1) The data is shown for the district as a whole ❑ Table 3.6 (pg 5)—shows a projection using the same scheme as Table 3 13 except it shortens the historical to only the most recent 6 years ❑ Table 3.13A and 3 6A(pg 6)—uses the same factors above except Factor 3 is substituted for Factor 2 The kindergarten rates are derived from the King County live births instead of the average gain ❑ Tables 3E 13, 3E 6, 3E 13A, 3E 6A (pg 7)—breaks out the K-5 grades from the district projection Summary level data is provided for percentage gam and pupil gam by grade articulation ❑ Tables 3MS 13, 3MS 6, 3MS 13A, 3MS.6A (pg 8)—breaks out the 6-8 grades from the district projection Summary level data is provided for percentage gam and pupil gam by grade articulation ❑ Tables 3SH.13, 3SH 6, 3SH 13A, 3SH 6A (pg 9)—breaks out the 9-12 grades from the district projection. Summary level data is provided for percentage gam and pupil gam by grade articulation. ❑ Table 4 (pg 10)—Collects the four projection models by grade group for ease of comparison ❑ Table 5 (pgs 11-13)—shows how well each projection model performed when compared with actual enrollments Data is provided in both number and percent formats for the past 13 years Summary This year we had unprecedented decline in student enrollment of 114 students The loss of those students changes our historical average gam in students Over the past 6 years the gam is now 1 06% annually down from 1 53%, that equates to 148 students down from 213 in prior projections Over the past 13 years the average gam has dropped from 1 41%to 1 12%and equates to 156 students annually down from 189 students. Using the cohort survival models, the data below is a summary of the range of variation between the four models This data can be used for planning for future needs of the district. The models show changes in the next six years ■ Elementary level shows increase ranging from 532 to 1042 (page 7) • Middle School level shows increase ranging from 179 to 232 (page 8) ■ High School level shows decreases ranging from-161 to-63 (page 9) The models show these changes looking forward thirteen years ■ Elementary level shows increase ranging from 721 to 2218 (page 7) ■ Middle School level shows increase ranging from 405 to 876. (page 8) ■ High School level shows increase ranging from 295 to 664 (page 9) This data does not factor new developments that are currently under construction or in the planning stages ' 2 a �____� �-a N O GO N 7 7 CO m M V iOtJ O V cn'] N O O cO N V Om 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N m M m m 7 m 0 N O N N NCO M N O N p - - — — — — — — L G1 Q coO m m r m O M m m (MO cD N W 0 0 7 a' V cO OrI N ON M t0 y n N N m M 7 N N O N 1� M o N cO ifJ m M N O cO M m Z O m 0 0 0 0 m O 0 0 - V - - M cO y O m O O O O O V N CO p V - o W O m m N M M o o 1� M N (D m n v NM O N m m O m CO O N M 1� M M M M V cO N N M OJ m N m m O O ? m M O m 0 0 0 0 M M O O C C.7 m M of M m m m N Ow O M V tp — N c0 N V M N M In M (7 a Z O N O N co (0 ^ O O O O r - m m N V �f) N O M M V 7 M M N W J J '^ O O N N m O r M •- •- N M m O N D o o M N N M R N N Cl) M Co V Z O � •-- � � � � � C N N � �`M II N N M N V � M N m V M W M W O O O cp a (NO O N N O N M V M O N (00 0 0 O M 7 m V W m rn m LLm') d ee}- ' y O (O a0 m CO r O N n O O r O M Op tO N O m m to COr V w co m a N N Mm O N m cO N `y N �O c0 N N c0 M N M v m O O N Q O O O O O N O M M c�O 7 O N r w M m m OMt m N m O J c ommm � � � mm � COM °� °) ' O W p O a N �O (O N V N M V M O o a' U O O m m N M N t O cN+1 m M in m m m m O N m N O 0000 m N N M � O � m m N M M N O O m O O M N N O Z > Q Q N O O N M M 7 O 0 C Q 2 N O O m m N o m m m m 0 O N M E N m m M O N V O m M M cO m m O m m 1� O M M OMO m O OMO O O` ' C 0 _ Lo m N cO m I M m — O M N m N m m w O — O N N n N V M N M O r m V C m m O O m m m m m m 0 0 N @ 'O m 0 m co O m m co M O O M L � � W W O W N � J w J C J M M N c0 coM 00 m ca M N V 0W 00 m a N F U — m a p F � Y � p n � � YYYY cO � r� mo a a n 0 o N V W O m N N QQ > (� co w < W o 0 0 0 0 0 o N O) 0) N W Q e e e e e o 0 0 o e o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o o a a e o 0 0 0 o e e o M M M M M 00 7 M p ~ J O M M O O N � I� O N M CO O N M O O M M N N a0 7 I� r O (O '7 U Z Z V O N OO V O r` a0 N M (O M O N M M O M O M o0 I� r •- O N N O V O j j j p U7 w 0 0 0 Q 0 z F- z J Z Q E J (n a CD m Q CD F- 7 Z Q u LL a a` LL C O O Q W Q V V V V G Z W J c E w > U J O N O O 00 CD (O N M M 1� O M O O f� V M O V O N (O O N N O O O M O O ((1 OMi E N M O ya Z J p O O O M N O N t0 f� O O N M N O O r O 7 V O ry M O M M 0 0 0 0 0 O- U w y Z Q Z p w � K O (n W O Q p U J of M M co M .4 V CO (D r co O O M M V CO V O -7 N V (V N (V ry N N N N M4 o z z p p] — — — — — — — — — •- — — `" r N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M Y y F- LL L U OQLLO � mmromromafDommaM\ rnrnmrnrnrnrnrnrnrn00000000000 .- NM7 (O Q' Z W O K �N m 0 N M V (n (D r a0 M O N M V LL� O r m O ry (`� V O CO 1z N m O N M V U U } W U a o C) J N O S O S M M N M r` V N 00 O O O O O M O O O O n M M O O7 J � (n � rovvvvvvui (ri (ri (ci (o (flroco co r; r• mmnco r; � ro ro� � � r- r� � rr� � r- ro � Q z rn O (O O O O M O N M M M M (0 O N S V COO M N 000 O O O d' O a O O O N O M M I CO M 1 W M O 1 M h O V N O O M O of mO O N 7 O M CO M N O O 00 — M O O W M 7 W (O M O O M N « O r N � N Q mMa0MM O — -- NNC MMO Vr: rOMV7 COVVVVVVVOO (O (O` a J M M M M O N O C O O M V CO M O O M M O O M O M O N r W M IT O '7 N O U Q W S C M V 0 00 M N O O M O V M O M N O a O m O M � O O M 0 F- F- r V V O r O O O O — M N M r M O O O r r O M O O O O N O V r` M a M O N M — 0 O J M co M M co V O (O (O r 00 06 of M M N O O N O N N O N N N N N N V V O O F- m .- N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N (O N M V O O n M M O N M 7 O O M O N M a O O r` M (D O N M L M Q Z W m m m - m - - - - - - m m m - - m - - - - - m - - - - - o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W U w } r .- '- .- e- .- e- .- .- e- .- e- e- .- N N N N N N N N N U) 0 (OL W V M to j N .- I'll 'a O N O � 1 J W N N > co a � w 3 LL Q D N C W N M V O O I�'OO�M'� o o a Q Y N M -It O O Pi 0(MI�I�1N O O� O O O O O O O O O 0 �) � t } 0 .. ... o 0 �I M a v m of U s NIM�I� r M O O N O,'1 �10 N O I� cO W M O O`M OI OIOJ OJ N IL N p (� OJ{O M O V 1� cf_ N (� V O — r O OIM O�COINIM M O U N > WO v `' N OCP LL', N W INN7 m LLI u E m @ _ O- O m tO Y "N M VOMH O NWWM iLL 0 010' o o o 0 0 0 0 00 } o01MIO IN N MM III o f LL E t 1 a M W N V to O O r 0 CO 01 O o M M t0 O O O O O O M r V t0 o ONQ> M4 �n � aorno oMM �n rm ONrn mmrnrn (n �nvv Mo � N � a N O N N N V M N m M a' N M a M M M M M M M itl (n m O M rr ! - - - - r r r r r r r O a N r r r r r r r r r r r r r N r r r - N a (u r r r r r r r r r r r r r O r a N r - - - - r r r r r r r r N M i d O V O O r r O r r r r - - a N r r r r r r r r r r O r a N r r r r r r r r r r r r r r N O d O O r r r r r r r r N 0 0 d M M M M M M N N N V d M N ^ M M Fr r r r r r r r r r r r r r N U W Q M N N N N N N N V M N N m 0 a r r r r r r r r r r r o a r r r r r r r r r r r a W d - O - - r r r r r - V M N r O N a n N N N N N N N N N M M N M N C r r r r r r r r r r r r r r N J J Z a O O - - - r r r r r - - - - - - W r r - r r r r r - - r W Q a O r r r r r r r O M M N - n - N N N r r r r r r M M N N M V M F r r r - � r r r r r N N H O � u`�ioo r° � vo °r�' � Nmoo � ' o O � nrn � (No (no ((OONrnrn (°iornv `� (O � � U a O T r r r r - 0 0 V N N N m N 0 a - - r r r r r - r r r r r r r r r r N � O � �nrno � (%� rn o �n � orn � rncO coo O •- v (ov �iMNoor <rrnrnro 'nNN a- - - r r r r r - - - N N M N O m Oa r r r r r r r r r - - - N M M M M r O O V M (p d7 n O O M e M (D N O (0 M N N V M N r a O - O O O - O M M - O O N a - 0 0 0 - O M M N - N N Za r � r r r r r r r r - r r r rr r rr r r r r - r r r r r m (n N M Q Z T a r r r r r r r r r r r r r a o Z a r r r r r r r r r r r o Q - O'. N � 0 { O � a' O O O O a r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r _ } a r - r r rT - r r r r r o a a o O o Q o rn 'm m V o Q o rn m m cO 0 C7 U o 0 0 m m 0 0 0 O N N M V _ N y H O 0 0 m m 0 0 0 O N N M V O _ v+ r r r — r r r r r r a U r r r r — r — r r r a m Q r m d ca ¢ m a' LU W U U LL, , Q M Q Y r N M 0 ifJ (D f� Co in 01 H a co M < Y N M (n O r O O H a H OU F (7 n 0 o N N V O N !r m NO N O N W V N C O N 0 0 04 0 �0 O N w NO a N a N O N M O (0 m N O O N U a N r r r r r r a O K m W O N a a F N N m r r r 7 M O O r V O O O M M O N M of M N N a' a0 r r V .N- r it r N a r r a EL � m a — — — a O r m cn M v ro M N r m O r o o� v cD O ro M cn r � r - - r — K { r r - - - - M J J <o Or rvNM � MrnonM Or co �na � com � � � IL a F M O CO m N a O m m (O M O N a a O M N M N M N N CO CL V V r p r a' r - - - N a ` r - - N a O N m of m N aD a� m c0 M O O r O V m O O r � r W O V 0 I� � N O O O d � r O r r O O C N N N d � M M N f` M G0 (0 In n m m 0 M e ' M c0 f� O m O O 10 m IA M N o O r m O tO of M m (O in c0 O n m m O N aM 0 0 0 0 0 0 M N N O N 0 a - 0 0 0 0 - - 0 0 - N N M N N V `p a rrr r r rrrrr r r a c a - o 0 0 - o 0 0 - o - - - - UI = N m r O O m N M M O (0 M f0 N O O rw O - Z M a T 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V N 0 0 Z M a 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 M N - N - M r r r r r r r r r r r r 0 O r r r r r r r r r r r r O 0 W i0 r (0 V r N r 0 �0 O O N O m ' w <p M r cD m N N c0 O w m W M N o m - L a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - a r r r r r r r r r a r rrrr r r r r r r r r o m m U Q N M M O O itJ V I� M O m m U O ¢ C/) N F O O O O O O - 0 Q r r r r r r r r r r r c = m a a W Q W J N W W J N Q Y r N M 7 In O r m m a Q M a' Y r N M V 0h a0 m � � � � a F M U 0 F O 0 O O O. a T N T O ~ N N N N V N y n N M V N n m o�m n N e-O m CT 6J n m O N N --�� tmOMN Nr--« - o r aN aN � ON(DM nrnn O M ° NOJ ne-mM N Cn ° � N O N � rymMM V.O m In n NCOm non t0 COO m O N O N CL�Or r m N r-MMMM M N m 0 N rye-e--r- r (D ryr r rrr r ppN r EL d N d N L , d � r 6l M�N O d N d N 7 0 a m O N r Q ° Z n N N V'O n rn n N r M r 0 0 0 n m m O N O N O CP r.- rr r (DEN 01M���� M Nr(D 2 Q1 � m � Nr ar ar U W � ocmMnN � Mncrn min ° � m o � � n CL N � de- re-re- e- m rn ar aco IL m mN�rm N lt7 ° m In CP(Or O n ° O m N n O m , W r OrreM-ems- ��N i� NN NN N �U (O T (D r O W r rrr r (oo rrrrr nry CLr ar r a- J J Q n e-NnV mm ° n nrmMN m ° � n OOf a On nn r `- rNa M r n r NOM rN N m m N N rr N d (ON a C O d r r W Z m OmONO M e- ° m OOMOM 7 r r p Mn tG M (p N Vv 0 �jJ rmOrN7U� 0 n rOr00p010CPm Or NN In NrV O m r r r r r fl N - NO Or N T-r r r r M m d r r r d - r r r N r F Lo (oWO m V ° m mNnm M ° mr'7om Om 00 M O N O O r M V m M r n rn n m m m M m O r r m 0 V O r O r m r M U v r r r r oo n v r r r r o n m a d r o a o r r r U) Q m O ° MnVO) O n ° O � NnMrmM ° O �Mo�n OOP O CO ° a70 rM 01 O� N r V mVMMN V m Or OmmM 01 n m Orp� WtO COM N Q� � J M Omer- O m Mrrrrr cp ON a M �OOr O �O N a MOOOOr ! �V�O 0 r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r m r r r r r r r N r U rvmrno� v �vo rr�rornNv °n TOE °v Oyu v��ornNa ° (n N OOrOO V N Nr r00 (O O oaf N -o V M d' NOOOe-O O VOM r rrrr r <p r rr re- r (D Na r rr rr r m o a r rr r- -Z r r r r r r r N o 0 �rmNmCO M m NmnrCP�O M N ° O � NnmN m.D M IU m O N n Or CTN M O B m mtOM M Vm� OQ�N V N V N > O tn0 NM M m d O Q 0 0 0 0 O O m L 0 0 0 O N d- r 0 0 0- O N m M } O N O V N r n r M a' o r r r r r ar r m oarre-r rr mo y r r .6 S Z N Z a) Z m rnrov�� rnmoM�= rco°n'v NNON °v � `0O; vr�n�n N pm0rNO�N N[Oorn ° O 0 0 0 0 0 N O r O n y r N O m O } rr rr r m rU N rrrr r m rp LSO OOOOO �N p� ULd' 000000 r err w> rr Wear rrrrr w � ae-rrrrr 0 ca Co 0 0] C J C C O C C Co C J C C O O Q a�OrMM � OO O Q O MmM7 of Q O t0 eb M �[1 C�d-o rMMmMn Min C� d-o MmMn M N C� n- a S r M Mr Tn 0 c7 N F-m00��0 O to N �000�0 O N d F Q� OmpO O r Ln N F OJ 00 �O o r � orroorr <oo a � ore-rnrnrr coo a � Uo rm�r r•- coo a � Uor � �' a'� rcpo Q 0]Q C O Y CO C 3 Y f� Q C � Y 07 Q C 3 ma ma va as , 0 �� O 0 °' �m 0 Om wm 0 Od JQ wop Oa_ QW Q rNM t m Q M Q rNM7 �U Q W Q� rNMO h co w O e-N K(� Y F-M U Y ~M O Y n p o N N V (6 (6 N c0 M V M m O M 0 7 CL N 0- N d N d N C !Y m N Z n M M M M M N w 0 ON mo o ON M o ON 61 N N .' ` r w' O EL N M p d N •- M N d N d N O Of (L d' 0 m N <O a m 6. � � � M p d � � M N d M O N N M r o O r V 0 m o M m r m N 00 a M O N M •- (O o O -- rro rna m � O � u� a MM o � Orr� v mm Mo O � rnco mM Mo p0 d CL� r � M N a d a r `" � M r N w' J J r M M n a o r co 0 0 0 r M r M u r m 00 o co 0 O � con Mr MO O � ommcn v � O � Mr Ma Mo mm mm m CE w' a F- M O � cnN rnr com O � ry � N OM O � � N a> r co co M In O m M m tii V M d� I1J O M � In M m •- M M � � � M m M •- d � � M M � cn M m O) N O o 0 r V1 7 (D o 0 N m O N O o 0 In r M M (D o O N O1 m O O n r O O N O) O) O d M p a V 0 0 a 0 0 N n K V 0 0 to N o a o N p � vr N o o v) m o 0 coo m 6MN co O mnvm ory O cc MNm � O mr vm ON a o o T M o N a o o v a 0 0r m I� N M o o v o a �U O � vCO coow rn O � coN rv�i ' Z'IMm cow rn Oc2 r � v co a O O M 00 M V) a - - - 0 M N p a Z Z Z x Z _O o O O O x _ mm _ " UOU O Om NMMU oO7ocn rMo� �a � � o oM Nd' LLI (r - � o oM o � � 06 Q� � •- � oo � N � w } of — � ooM oCO o y a a p co a o v a a xa a x m m J p O ifJ O oOJQ N 0 If O Q p O d' O O O N N x } a M x } x a U U m U m U m J o ¢ m Lu 0N Q(� co o ¢ �omocnn mc�o 0Q� O 7 (I (D Uo o N H m 0 dHm o m F- m 0 0 w Q oo ovo- -cNn co-n Mcrno OM O a ¢m ' mQ (L Um` d wn w w < w UJ ¢ H a) p ma �Qn < � m � c a QU) < mma F- O=m o m 0 a t �m ao m N M CO M N M V CD O CO _' CO J M - - -- - -m 7 0 CO m m a � m w - V (O m -0M r ON m m a M N CO v m 0 a N 7 m N m CC N N V V w m � a N V N N ifJ O O a N .- N � � d ry .- O H O a Ql ' N m (O N 7 a N ap M (O W (O o N a N N V N o 0 N M N M O CO o O N m N M CO N O N OD O r a0 O O O N p m p �11 CO m O� O a N .�- .M- N N O a ry M m �O M M OfN t0 N V N (O af a N ry a ry N O d r M r a m O �O N N CO o r m M o O N m N N e 0 O N m N N o v m m O N m O r m Ln m O N N O OJ O a a N O r m N CD N � � N N 0 0 r O O M - ' O N r N Z O M M N O N CO N M O O N O O N O N m of O N r of p� a V N V CO pp LU O � mcOo rmi omN O � mm � cc°o � v (n O � mcOom omN O � c�+> wro coop vO w 0 a - � � � � � � � acr � � r � N � � � a ZO m N m (p m pp O 00 m O O N O O M N m c0 m CO O aOp M COO N O N p W a a M N m Cp a n M M N M r m a n V m N M CO a ^ M m N m iM r m J J 7 O�a o 0 0 0 r O a Om - N N a Ir Z v CO M NV ar p CO M ry r V W O a O a O a O F Z (O O m m CD M ' O O N M u� ° ' CO O m m CO M ' O N m O W O O O Ncc O Nov F- N o o e _ o (~,) 0 N N O N V mO CO m e `o pN 7 a O N m O O V r 0 O Cm0 m V O NN V O it 4 m N N m N a' 4 V N N N m O a' 4 m N N m N '- F N 0 � rcom O •- mm N N N O N 0- 0 Mw O � omo � � Mr O � m � o mao °c\� � O � o �oo � v° °o\ r (n a' N M M O m V N w N M CM N O M O a' N M M O m V ry "a N M M N O M as a V O p a Z = h � N O N m m c r O � � in o� Nm mry ? O - m (Dm - m rn v; oof o� NM Ory (n CC V N O N V c�. (n CC - M N - N O N M a N 0 a0 7 '1. (n } a M N N O N QZ a � � � � � v o -' z a z� � � � � u� O a � � � � v o zcoa � � � � O O o O of O oa t n ~ N ~ m ~ m wm � mu� m o � wzm � mrm Mr w m -' � mu� m o � w mm � mrro mr M 0 N r m m N m `,_ m O in m N O N cO �, m � O N r m m N ro � � O �n m N O N co O O a N M .- N m m O m a O N N N m O m O a O M N m m C,. O a' O N N N m O m ti a V v a } a r a r V v a. a N v a a c a m a m = C J C C = C J C C = C J C C = C J C C 0 o ¢ oyrm ov m mC7 o ¢ ovrm Ov m mC7 o ¢ oarMo ¢ ovrM = aD m 0 (D Z-: � vro � m C7 C7 = � D -- aro - m C7 C7 O F M N N M V N w F- m N N m V N �.. N F- N N N M V N O F N N N M V N w V) O O - - O - - - Ln O - 2 O O r - N 0 - 2 O O - - i0 O a [0 d a N d of N d a N a (n m ¢ C (n CO ¢ C (n 07 ¢ C (n C2 ¢ C O a O a F O a F O a w w O m w O w O d w m w O d w ¢ w O m m m O N H a m = Q m O N F a m O m 0 ' N F a m 0 O ry F a m M O d> m O m m O m O. 0 O N V T a7 T N T O T V Q) m T N co M M m co m a OJ M N (O N V m M 00 N m a O N N 0 -- O 2�1 d MN ON O N d O O NNp ' (K dOO NNN �LL7 0)d a N d �Mm 00 N Y O N W O N V O O N r O O N 7 (On N N O c\ o d' d N •- •- d N (n (O d N m M d N �n �n itJ � d N � � O n O N_ O N M O O O (n m O m n m m 7 0 M 0) N n O N N (O O N (p N n N O N m O N ONO rn p� O m p> r W (n OD if1 (0 d' M (n O m V T it r 0- IL CL� � d � � co d � m M M m 0- CL� � u� (n (n d H m m v m p O n (D 00 (O O M t0 m (D M V O O n ro O rn N O a O M Ov dCL CL a a O O - O O O (oomo O Of r O N (L 1� N cN0 Ern M M M M W n N r N J CL J V 0 7 O r 7 O M t0 O 7 M N N rn O (o O (na O r (n v O M M 00� O _ _ d f- O) O O N M (n 00 0 00 O (no O mo O nN nN O WWWW O d M O in M V m V in O O N •- IL d CL d M M IL d � (n (n in � (L d � {� LO In N -'� 01 m (O 0) O OOO O O O d' a d V d CL d — a- — m M m ' O d d 0 0 7 m m 0 O M N M N O 0 V -O V M 00 N O - �nvrnrn O � vo coo O mum �nrn O d' M O { 0 r �0 wM (n n r (n d m N N N N W (h O (Y 0] N 00 0 d - - a- d M M m m� d n� (n (n N (n d 0 7co co 0 m (n rn 0 � wv N0 Sao co o � Nom (n U O d' (n In O M N (D O N In N " O In I O a N 0 0 0 a N V tf1 M M a N M M M M a. N T O W O d' N (O O ifI r � d � v (n 7 (n d Z wnn � on mm � �nm (nm � rrnrrn r rN m 0 7 N O O O O �n n 0 O N m N m O m M D7 m O r O O d' �- 0 0 0 0 d' ` N N N d' N N N N W O 00 O d' d. � d d d M m m m d 7 (n V (n Cl. Cl- 2 a 0 O n O (O (p o m (D V m O r n C) W (n W N z O O m o O O O �r N O O m m M M O 0 N N N N O d' d' O O O O O EL O N N N N CL O N N N N d' O D7 0 0) O K Z Ur d � � � � � d d d - OW LU W Q Q � O � m m m m N N N N O U Z H 6) O O O O F (p F- F- N N N N Q H in (n (n ifJ � > HU d m Q ¢ ¢ ¢ O ¢ O C7 7 W O w � w w w F' w Of 0 _ O 0 Q Q U 0 QUO � T r¢i ¢ 0 � � cQ'� Q O � � (C> p � � co � (¢o F- cc r¢iQ F- Z C7 co m cr O m (o K C'J U7 co u) U d' 0 2 2 m 2 N (D co m Y W W W W C7 W W W W C9 U (n V) 0) (n M m m m 0 rn 0 a N N N N g N P1 x V W V aD %x c7 cn xxx O O O v h Oo O 0 X N, v M O O x NN v N O O X 7 V 7-1 V M W r O m M u N O M M 16 0 117 In tD (O 10 V N N m M O w w w GO O m 0 0 0 0 O V O V s{ O - - - -- -- N LO 4 �n F- mmMM F vvav F- a yy �$ ooao xx veoo O QN N Z N r o m o m m M 0 o N M a0 M O CO M O M 0 r j Cc m N N N N C O A M M 07 W M N O N O t00 m tOO M M O W r M O N O O O O O m m m m m m j N Y C FO" N m N 10 F N M M M m 0 7 C V V F M — OM M M rElf > � r veoo veee eeva veoo p p c I11 7 �fi c N (O N (O e N 01 N 6� c O N C O lY � cW O O � .- riO � Qcflvcov RMvmv Qmmvo� G (n N f% J = _ a af o -- o 0 _ Z r } Y } rn O R m o R m V rn O R m m rn v r rn m rn rn W Z � M Q coM M O N 6�1 N M O m O m tp M O1 M CO �p Y§ f� r O r N O O O W f0 M M m M o O O 0 m M M a^ 0 w N N 0 N N N N N V It 7 C' M M N m N r rn o 0 o a e o 0 0 r C VI 'o D Ei U rn rn rn rn � Q ¢ m Owl 0) `o cowoaooao c6MvMv O � 'u O o ° o = a $ I� rnmco oaO U v�'• O am0 O O m mO W W W T aro o N 0 0 Obi O O Om1 000 , ZCL e- D U C N o 0 0 LO Q O O ZS O V W Y N a0 N 00 2S m N N N ZS O 0 m O a � m o ml� l� rn o Ml� ml� rnvr� o o Inocrn Q � (7 m oovN o000 � .- o � ooV p W ¢ S o z < a a rn rn rn m O K Hp o E u rn � R �v `r � rn � Q � NON m � Reo �O �� R nma U } aa`i rn rn m mp N w Cc) O z v v 0 O 0� 11 O W v m m O a II II 7 N O N (O N W N 00 ornrnml� n ommnmr� 0000rnrn o D 1- N N N N N H a V V M M H W J r o'1 Q J M ¢ J ^ Q (D In Q u1 O m Q N (O N Q O (O y Q O O W W W W N Z) W W W W W W W W d Z) W W W W (D o Q a d a` d O a' Q IL IL d d Q U' Q IL d 2 a n 0 o N N a 0 5� � m � o Rvovo = S� rnwrnm o � � � � rn (D <0 N (O X v M c0 "' Z$ Lo lLo U� n t0 x M (00 M r ronMlnv yM ONm yv m o m � ln olnm mvo � o � CDM IZo N ES V M V M V V o0 00 W ap V d' V V O O 00 O) N O O N O O O O O H 1p IIJ � In In I- M M M M M H 10 10 In N In F f ,.� N 0 0 0 +• � � o � � � rMi � � 5j n o w o 5j C o m o o Q °' rn rn o � y 0 0) L t0 �xc M N M O ui I� N I� N N M In M In In O I� O 00 O � m � � 00 ❑ X v M v 00 ❑ � ��'?�M 00 ❑ ^ �.�.... � ❑ � v v M N > T O m U r O in O V ca 01 N h N O N O of p Op A C C O) p0 N O Ili a0 (O M M M M M O) oD O O V M M M M a a v a O 0 O O LO o) 0u) O 0 0 O O N N N N O J 2 = 2 = J K DoG� Of 0 0 x o 0 x w W w W '� '� Q c7 } } } �, O ❑ $1 N �D N O ❑ x N M N M O ❑ O ❑ % N O O O O O (p O N N N N d ~ � o `rm m `n mm � vin � In � � MMOIMm mnrnvvo H Ui Ifi In In In F- M M M M M H V V V 7 7 � IL a. I.zo e o e 0 0 � o DO t0 00 c0 In M 10 M a O V V V 7 �J N a a 0 ❑ tm0 V 0 ❑ R O 00 O W 0 ❑ In �.In 0 ❑ N N N OON v N N N O a O `O V In N to 7 - - U O N O O M M W M M M M M W r V 7 V O (D (O (O (O CO O Z Q -gyp F I!') In In to N H M M M M M F V a r M M M M M a V N 0 a Q M O O (O Q O M O OM o m OM m 0 2$ M O L) =O Q S o a a` O O 0 �5 0 0 �5 Uw Lo o � U oo ❑ R ��Nc�+> o ❑ RMac�na oo ❑ Rv1°invin o ❑ Ru°Jim °r° � w 0 z a N N N N d m II II M I(0 M t0 In N In N In !� I� V 70 N of N O CNO II V N M V I� to W M W T M I� O) f� O V V In In to ` H ❑ J M Q J M Q J ca') Q J c'a1 Q w Q m cn w Q co co m Q lD w rn Q o co coN F M M M M O F cw'] [w+J M M F M M M M F M M M M F c7Y ¢ aaaa C7lOQadaa` 0 ¢ 0`. a0- a ¢ cD < CLa- a-CL 0 a O O u C �p 6 � C C O N@0@ C N O E i0 d O_ t0 O N p a o E w O O 'w y d O N v E O 0 2 Y Q c' — � N o 0 0 o rn o o a o F d m m Q o 0 0 o Q o 0 0 o Q o 0 0 o Q o o vo b O ❑ Y Y > ❑ R N N V M O R j ❑ v v M > ❑ R O m Q Q Q Q v a -6 �6 ~ Ir } � ' �$ o00o �5a000 � ooao 0000 Z 0000 e vm � o a v � v � o 5co Mco,. o mNinN W O F LO w (n N M N v N 0 0 0 0 J = _ of o 0 0 0 wwww � m o d6 2�55co � o � o� t5 � oc000 o> tt55moo � Z > } T } 00 Rm co o � Rvvvv o0 R � o � sa W O O N N N v v v N d Z Q W O Q m Q sF m co o N M N M M V N v m m 0 cc lh m O to m N o N M N N N V N M 1� N r N N (00 [MO M M M M O N N N N O � N N N N O N O � O O V V V V v F- F tM0 C _ V) O J m J m m U U U O O � QQ � '` mmrnco � w t5 ��r�� mow_ �5ovov "- 25 �° mcoom J N 00 ❑ „_,M f0 N 00 ❑ R c`- v oo ❑ 52 �.�.,.r o ❑ 52 N v O d 0 O N N N N a 0 0 U ❑ ..'..�'^i � OOi � M N � «� O r m � � � 00l N � N U .m. O of GO M N Zco d Q h co co m H cn c7 c� i+� H cn N in N a in v �n O C a v K o U " �5 o° o 0 0e° �5 o 0 o e j aU m ° c-° _ 52rnor�i °r° o S� rNi co Rio Rvvvv SIN or rmio N N o o Q Ol ao o ao 0 QQ O E U 0 ❑ S2 N v V O ❑ $Z O m 0 m O ❑ O N O ❑ % v ON w a U 3 2) O `� o K O z d mII II N N co m co r O O O N O N m N tD cp N � � c F- rQi Q m Q can Q (Qj Q w N Q o co N Q o co N Q o co N Q o 0 ro o M m rWi cW+> o cW+� cW+� m cw'> cwn M cwn cw+> M M M H U' Y ¢ adaa c7oQaaaa C7 °' ¢ aaad QU' Qaaad a Appendix A.2 - CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Enrollment Projections 1 T O O O O (fl CO — (O 3 £ 00 Cl) co c0 p O Co O — LL 0 0 0 c) N >, 0 0 0 0 00 1� N E OM 4 � CO V CO LL o 0 0 0 m LL C O N CO O CO h Cl) Cl) � V r LO O lNfi r h m O M O) V n r M 6 0 0 , F N O (O N N O V r N CO 00 In N M O n O ` O 7 y Cn 2 (D n 'O O N a) 0O "y^_' O (O (O co O ONj O O O O O O O O I� O N M (O CO O t O r V E a C 3 N Cl) (O N M O N LL N (A W U) F- U cn 4co Cl) , CD O V 01 0) 7 W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O) It (C) 0 0 (") N N O N ( r N r r. C O N m al N c W r L a � v o n Cl) Lo co O a! c0 V O 0) V (Lo O O O O O Cl O O O m It Cl) M N O V w N r r Cl) r M V N N co C 7 N o oU cn M a) :z pn O h Q co N In M O O O O 0 0 0 0 M O m p N N co u cN. n n O N r CO N M r N M r r (O d N N N j r NO Q o 0 0 Q) O n a 0 a N a1 R N N C O 0 � O (O (n a) O N N Cl) r r (n N 00 (D r �... 00 00 00 m 3 N y = O O r Cl)� O ' W) r cn M M O V (O NO _ N � N a O O N �O O Q O U m W O a � y O C a a1 Z r 0 (O O O W (O N O O M 7 N r I. V V O CO (h p co N '- N cc N m •1 O O co (O r co N M r 7 7 N CO co co r r. (O I� N O \ a Q c00 N ON O 3 N m @ a W m r h (CO = p O G ^ O m CO O O { Io N M co co co 1 (O !to N (O (fl N 3 O N C O (O I� O (O N co r r CO W W V M r N CD M Cl) M O (D CO Cl) N C pN Ocj. 3 Q (A (n 00 N N (O CD N N (O 00 N N (n 00O a Cc s y 2 0 c T Y D r Y > Y D d Y Y olm Y S ~ O � � .N. � o rn W > > avi = _ w T c "O 1 0) LL LL O O N o a Q. Y G G 2- Co ?, N w O 7 �. y N w N m v m N W L C O j y LL a F m > a n H n n F m (7 (7 0,i u a� y aa' Q 3 a rn (i a a m a ° a o a a a a` <n m m Y y •` 3 Q 0 f m a) mu D Z o D LL a D Z o Z o �° o 0 0 E W -miYro j ° o oa at - LL oL o m :aL > � 2 a = a a a a7 o Q � H -o c o l o a c Z5 c CO W ° � � � a � m — � Ems,= m � Eco _ EIco m a) o c '0� m n a) = N a) a) (n N a) m a) � 41 O W O O v ��o R m o ~ m amL ° w � mL owf o w � � 3 UT) o LL J O d H U z Z 10 + Q Q Q a to 'O a1 a1 QI U a1 � N y 12 12 m a n N M R h CD 0� a0 i t r M LID (O CO m N m r N N (D O co6P.- r.- rl. r.- a r m 00 C) CD m m CD 0 N co I r M V m (D CD (D 00 m m m M m A n r- r- r-- r- rn r.- r� m m m m O 0 N m O r O N (D M co (O r r (D N co O LO (fl (D O ID (D (D co fD W M f� r 00 O � r N O N 0 0� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 o o o o o 0 0 0 o 0 C o T o r O a) a) co co O N N LO m M m O � to f` � n co m m 0 co M m (D � 0 f� m m m r N N V (n co co ir- Cl) O M V V V V V V <l to LO (D (D LO LO o (O (D co co ram,r f� n m m N M O (DO N � O M h co 0 f� co O co r- O (D O Cl) (D (D OD LO (D co O Cl) O O r N N N M (O V d' LO M M r W Cl) > m CD m co m N f� M m M O W N M M M M M M 00 M m d' � � M O Q m m m m N M M CD f� 7 M O m M O O T T m mlm m 0 0 0 0 0 M co (N M i N (fl r C r r r r r r r r r N > O N M 00 M M O O LD V t` M O m o ' V OD m m m m m m m o In LO M N J M M r M V N M V r O W r r r r r r r r N N N N N (0 p> _O O a) 0) O O O O N N M V LO r p r0 O r - o 'D N N � O Ln V w T O (D V O O O N M o N M O O O O O N N N N 7 a O Q) M r LO a Ln Ln rn @ VI _O m m m m m m r r r r r r r co '6 C6 MO O O O O O O O N M M M 01 Q O S O O 06 N 3 4 O y r N M O M M O O lO 7 r M O co V] M M r O r r M r co N M m o p� M M m m M V M V f` O 4! Q O O m a) tO f� O LO M M (D LO (D LO M 7 Q O O O m 0 0 0 0 O N N M V N O V1 N r r r r m _ cc a o o a 3 0 o e G7 Nl0 @ N H r lD r Mn OV NNM rV Md 0) 1` N N m 00 "r N N OO Om � mN a. O O O O O O O N M Z .a>N O o7MN O w C >� _ e e e o o e o e e e e e e e R C C L o 0 0 o e e e o a o 0 0 o O Q O ° C > CD LO ti (O 00 O Iq N M (D M M r CD O LO M M O m (0 O coMN CO 00 W 00 M O O Q U r W R1 O1 r N N LO M Cl) h M 0 {p �j 0Ce) 0 0 0 r M M r 0 0 N > J O (O (D tD r r n r T m O tb O V O r '- r r r M U N r 0 L O U O1 a s o� O t N J " n N W I N I co m — O O M [0 V O N 00 co = W LO (D O V O r r IO N D1 + > CO d R N L6 O CY) O M M M (D M V M (D m Cl) A � coO N co m N N co (o O LO co O m DOS O 3 0 j w m m O m O O O O O r V y y o co m m m O m 0 •- r V N O 00 M U C M m Z a Q (O Q O U Z + J Q r IJJ N O CO N Q r N M LO m N m O r N 0 m M @ Q �- N co In (O r, 00 m O r N N L F (D Y r F- 0 co m M a M � M ovM000n (om0MrlCD 14� - U M m M N m M O O M rZ r r-- C V (O N O C 0O O M M M m m M O M N N 00 7 V V M r� M r m r O r r r r r r M r r r M r r r r M CD r N 2 00 a r (D 00 m N (D Ln V M coM M N M M __ M N r a ~ O M M m O M M M M N N N 00 7 Ln V V M (D r O r r r r r r r r r p M r r r r (n r N p`_ r f` (D r M N (D R N It M Lf) co N (n co (O Ln o `-• a) CO r` M O u) O M N M (D 00 M M O a N (p co OD M O N c) n V (n r D) O (D N 00 M M m (p V O N O M O O N 00 (o �{ O) 'T O M Q) u) r N N N N N N r� V V M N V r M M M N M M co N N N � V 7 V Co (n N O r0 O r r r r r r r r M r r r r (n CO r p O r �-- r r r r � r r r M r r r r Ln ^ N M N d N d CD a O a O O O V (D (n M V (n O M M M M M O M o r N M r O V O O N N 0 0 (n N CO V o M W W M N M M O r O O M O N M M a uj U r- M r- O rl r M N M (D N (D Cl) CO V M n r r N N r N N r (D l' V M N 7 (D N � N N N N N N (D N N r (D V V M M Lr) 00 �n q p O r r r r r r f� r r r Cl) r r r r In r p O r r r r r r (� r r r M r r r In r N N a` N a` a � a M N M M 1 r M r M M M M (n 00 r o N (D N M M M O M M 00 O N r r- (D o 4 () r co (D r-- M N n V M (n O 00 r M M p) N U M (n M N N N M M In (n O (n n N N M M O r r r r r N O r r T M M N N V M M (.�j O N N N N N N M r r (n V CO M CO LO O p O r r r r r r r- r r r M r r r r (O LO N p O r r r r r r n r r r M r r r r (n (O co r N d N a`' O N Itt a r a L (O 00 O M (D V M r�- r N O r 00 Cl) M M o 0 0 0 Itr t` W O M (n r CD N n (D M N M o Cj 0 o V V (D r` V O T O co (D V co M Lo cO LO N_ ^ (':) M N M co co (D M N N M V (D (n f� N u) N 'Tco �_ pO r r r r r r (D r r r M r r r r In M O r r r r r r r r r M M m M M a` N C ) a _ O co _0 U r a) 00(n M M N M (D O I' O_ N r r V M a r U r- r-- N of (D (D (O V h (n co V n V CO N o ry � N N 7 r M r- r� Ln O M r In 00 p 0 LO N V O LO M N O M M (n O Lo V O V N N r 0 O r r 0 (D O r r M V { O O a M n r r r N O r r M M T N N N M O p O r r r r r r (O r r r M r r (n r N Ln O O r r r r r r (o r r r M r r r (n r N a- N a N a C C a N O 2 M r, r (D In N M C) ItM M N IT M (D M r (0 In O 00 V N (n r-- N M (O (O r O M M o E a, to CDr r` 0 M N O M M n M (D r O p N r 0 (D 0 In O O N '�)N ( N N M N M M N O p O O 0 0 r r 0 0 O (D N 7 M r r r r r rp O r r r r r r (D r r r COr r r r (n � r r C N a r N a W r a r a r ,�., M M r � IT 00 O It (D V r M 00 CD r O M 00 7 (O M N r -It (n r M 0 V 7 o O 0 0 0 0 0 ° M O LO O N (�7 M M N M N O O O O 00 LQ O O O O O M O O N N N N M O (p p O r r r r r r (p r r r M r r r r O r p O r r r r r (D r r r M r r r r M p N a r N a r O O 2 O °1 -O W O @ N M co O M O LO CO V r M O V M D1 + A O l6 N M M O M O (n r M V f� M O_ V M m + 5 N M M O CO f� M (n V N M M r O M M (0 N N 7 M M O M n M Lr) V N Cl) M C f` O CO M m N CO E t p 0 0 0 0 0 O O N N Cl) V 4 7 U c E t Mp V O O M M O O r 0 C) N N M V N ' U o p r r r r N r r r (D r r M r r r r Ln r 7 N a r O m 7 i N Q r p L () m e U V R U c 2 ' C O -0 W 00 N O '0 W 00 N a. 0 ❑ (7 M � i r6 i+ a) ❑ 0 (n � a7 ' RQ Or NM V (n CDr-- ODCDa) 046 O m y < ❑ rNMvLn (or.- OD m � NM O Y � ~ a ? � Y Y r r � F CL c a -aa ° c -° L w d) �_ p N C) N 4) p v _O N o J O •.. .Q d C N J O ++ N .0 -C C 3 a 3 E c o n p d 3 $ = E c a) (n > a` c c c a) c ° o a m y c e m c ° E o �� CO ° L 3 o E `m o' ° �° o L Z a o y ], GI ° ° a) c o °' t d c 6 o c ° o >. N Z d N �, y > r >, ac) N \ Z J (y N d d O N J M Co GI a) O N O t m ❑ (D > o a > t o m ❑ a > o a O N m F- z Cac) m Y n Uo � z Caa)) a) Y n. Uo D 0 0 m � a � a U m � N � N_ It M 'IT M N M (7 M NI- co co mM M (p It CDI� to r M M CD 0 (p a) ,I- CO N N N M V' CD M M Q) N N N (D N N N co d' 'IT N M N N N N N N N 1� -IT 7 V co (D O d N d a m a y Il r M CO In O M M M M O N (o co O co O O N N O O to N 00 uj U N O M M O M O I-- O (D (n N W 7 (yj N O1 M U-) N M co N (O M M V N N N r r 00 N N r (D V V N CO N N r r N N N r CO IT 7 M M to rp 0 r r r r r r r M r r r tT p 0 r r r r M r r r r to N d N d (n a to a _ _ r to V (o to T r CDr M N M M N M `- r 0 co CO (DM M M CDN I-- U O I� O I-- V M (n O I- w N ,i- V U O I- 7 I- N M to to O In I'` N M co p N r r N M r r "T to M N I,- N p C4 r r r N r (n 7 M M MU-) O O p r- In r r M r r 0 r r r r M r r to r N d N d O a r r r r rr r r V N _ U M M to O M (O N M 11, N O r I� V N N o p M to f� f� 0D M M to (O N I� (n M N o M p M V r M 1- V (n r 0 co O M co t!'1 04 CD co CO M p M 0 M V r N 07 (O M M M M CON M O O O r CD r r r M V V n r (D (O y rp O r r (O r r M r �-- coOD N N O O r r CD r r r M r r r r (n r M N a` N d rn a gyp-' N r M CO M V (o O V O N M V M a p N I� tb tp M co M V I� LL7 (D V f� V Co N o N U M M M V r 00 r N O M to co V V in m (V 0 CO 0D M M N O M M (O O to 'C 0 7 N N N rn U O O O r r 0 O O r r M V V O O O O r r (D O r r M M V N N N 7 O O O r r r r r r CO r r r M r r r co co p O r r r r r r CO r r r M r r r r (n r N N d N d p aCN m U to � r (D In N to 0 7 M M N 'C O N CO o _ V In N _O 0D v N 0 I- N M r (D (D r O M o p O O r 0 0 0 M N (D 0 MN V N r 't co M W M r p NO O r 0 0 0 7 N O O N M N N N M M N O p O r r r r r r (p r r r M r r r co N O N O r r r r r r (O r r �-- M r r r r to r a r r N a N to M t7 V' r I- O V O V I- N M 00 O o r to 0p V CO(O M (n A V M (n r M O V V (D o_ j p U M to N N O O (n (D In (D Vt oD V r'IT 00 co 00 I� O' U r co to N m O N 'C (o In (D r V V r I� Y O O O O O O O Cl) O O T M M N coN N p 0 0 0 0 0 r M O O r N N N N M 0 � r r r r r r r r r r O p O r r r r r r CO r r r M r r r r to r 0 O N a r O N CI- E N E O O y 7 0 0 y a () O @ N co M O M O t0 r (O V I- CO O_ V M c + M O Ia N co O Cl) M O M O to r (o V' I- Cl) O_ V m c N O co M co M I, M (n 7 (N M M V I� O M O m y N 7 co co I� M (f) V N co M C I� O M (d C t o V O O 0) N 0 0 O r o N N co V N ' V O t O V O O N 0 0 O r 0 N N M V N U m o r rr or rmrrrr (Or E rr rr (prrrMrrrr n r N Q r p L 7 2N Q O U U N c U R o a1 C p W O 'p W a a) CD Y9 N (� y9 1 O r N M to (D n co M O r N — U Q Q r N co n (o M O z 7 � Y r r r a) j � Y H a` a�i o c a) d O = a y — Q > ta \ d N v U > n > Ivy N v� 0 _> y C J O v @ 7 DYO n (D �- d c 7 ` e- Q C (q y 1 omyCne0.m � o� c_ `N oN (cic`o �cnm Ea) t t L0 O a>6i, Z .0 > Z i 13) > y O N m rV CD o 0 o r U)Co a0 az i � Oi C N N f" E m O Y U o S E Q m O) Y U o m m Appendix A.3 Student Generation Survey fl_ U700f— N a-.;t C1 C0000 (DNrLnNMNMrM000) NM N N NItN 'q aO+ � OOONCDCV LOLO ";T (Of— CDMrMItCO O CD C'MMOrOOOOOOOraOO L L o OC)OMMfl- UO (OCoU') co f) I� � (DNOOh 0 I— r00N CD,rinO 0 OMV MOON V MCCMr-- LOU) U) 00MM1- m rMh m N N r M 0O rqrrOMT TC) OCD cn Z O O O r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S O 0 i4 a`) f-- CDMOfl- U*) m coU') OLoco (D ,t a) (OOCDNLI� CA000 c OCDf� V O (DNNr000 .1- U-) (DM q c N Nln r lzj- r LP) CO 7 CO r O r O r N O CO Orr ) 'O _ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,a c � � Or � L.- MUocoO 1:TN (Dcom MrM -,I- M Cn OOOr (DMf-- "tO (D � LO M' I- CNMfl- rO r r rr (DN E T7mr r -) co V MNNNI- NNCDNrM E r G) llon, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0) W HMV OOm4,) co "I' OOOOI.() r0000MM00LC) MC.OrN6) CDf� N rNrr � CD 'tOf-- (D � rrr00 rrr � LlON (D ;6 l0 N Lp w r 0 H F COLnN00 (Y) LO QDLnMMNrNr00N r— LO r Nr (Dr rr CY) y N � 2 2 yLnONMMrCOCAf� � ONI� r � MI() � N I� MNOMOON CO T r r LO r } p a r a U v M co co Ln �t Lo "I' N I— OInV NOr (fl LnrO c E r N NNOIq CO M E NNr00 M y t L O W W 3 N O t LO 0 A 'C CDC) CD 000000000000 a rC'') coNLocMr� c a) 0) a) .O �' � rMC 0') a) O m O. 3 n 0 O C) V Q 0 O O >4 CD V C0 U) W CO O O r 00 P7 00 00 r M N �T >>O) CM M (Y) (Y) CO I- uco04r r Ln0O000 OO � rrCY) 'IT OD U rNMr0001- C C r O C c r r M T L Q L Q ) v U v O O Or It M U70O (D O Or 00 M N O r M N V O (D (O Lo WOE N MNr r UOCOCD00 Wr-- MIZ3- 00 (ONI-- NrCDI-- V) 7aj O US 75 rrrLO a c a O_ L r > O a) m sC5U U) a� moo � 4) �, w � J E co U) U) (n c c E m ZLn � o � oo oQ) m L=n Z 3c5 � Q c a -°o L) cn 3 mL a`) 0 � � �' Z c c -0a- c LL. m -p m m = �c O °� F— > > (n °) LL m c a) d m E m a) — = � a2 � � mY -- o E E a) (D W C, a) 2 � cm -0 6m � > `mEo � a CL c � 0 � F m mL� L � � � � r � � m m o � _Z > a) m � 3 N = � � � 2 8 a) a) (ULn > > m E e _ m � v, � mmmc - m >_ > >>m > m QQQ � = YYJJJJ � � � � (n > 0 O 000JJ (Ef-- 1 O M V LO M V r M Ln LO O O LO M I� (fl N O M a0 aO NCO r O 00 N M V � r (O r N r N N N N m O U LL LO N r O 't W M W RT r LO M r s �Y O L9 CO O N N LO r N LO V CO CM c f/) r r (O r r CO N CO O = M d N N c N Ln N r M r r M to r In N r CO CO (O Ln CT O N r r N 'ITV M N M O N r Lo r r In r Lo co + O N M (n M M r f- N O LO N I- M M LO O U') H co O N V M c0 Lfl Ln Ln Q c dl E N r co r M rN70 Cn _ y CD y r r r LO ti O CD w O 3 N L O = U 2 'C r V I,- Lo ap M a0 d1 CO r O w N O (fl M O O " O O M M O lf) M O ti 'o m N M r Ln r� CO r M N M r N N O f-- M � r N r N N r r N N O M r C`) r CY) cn m L E m � r a � CL O U O V c Q N O y CD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c D ` O_ (n 3 V O O o d � w r T r- M CO CO CO O V W r (0 CO N O (fl M O O "zt M M M M O Ln M (O � a CM r LO I-- Lp r 07 N M r N N O I- M qtr N r N N r r N c E N C1 M r M r M O 3 C d y R a t 3 M I � r N � CAD N N 0 W d d Z rn 0 0 U n-_ O C -0 N V N O C6 C w O O Ln N 0 LD U O ECLS Q ( co Y Y 3 a w w > m m .. a _00 ° O O o (nw > __ > — c c c - ca O On- C) FL p G> (0 N Y "0 _ O O > > O _N -O O o (6 � LO C = C y � 3 Vi ,U N (6 (6 L6 (n (0 LN4 (NO O N (6 W L�6 O O O N C >O N N 0 QQM Co.M Co.co000 W U3E M3E JJJ � � Z (nI > > > , M O O O 0 0 O LO � ti 0 cM LO LO ti O It LO M O (N CO LO N r CO L) N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H L L t LO N 00 t ti O O LO LO r O r M N r r - N O (D M U li W O 0 0 0 0 0 0 r O CDLL (n co c 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c 2 = 0 0 is m M LO (O m O N O M M O 00 0 r r r N LO c 0 O � ONONrrL[') OM c G) d � -d rM000000000 � 'a 00000000000 -w co O O N M � CO O M M N Cfl cn r- M M i r r M M = CO M = LO O W r E m N O O O O O O O N O E E W0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CD (D 0 W W M CD M ti N M (D N �t N N �- r r N R H r N H -o c r r N M r- 1l- N O N M d• O O 0 r cn V o CO CO r LC) 0 M O LO N O U LO c O N N O r M r 1- co M �--- _ y O O L O (D N 0 r a) 3 N W W N O � U') 0 i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o Iq N M co co N E •Q 0 O Q Q CD ~ ~ o� O O �+ O 00 00 O O N � M M N m T O0 M O O -0 w, V N Or,- 1` O O 1- CM N y a o 00 a) C C �- r M M C a a L a � 7 3 U V U U O O O m V) O co 00 O O N r O O N LO 0) N LO N co O 0 N 0 r- r- CO O 11 CO (D r r M Iq co CO co Iq C L r ♦= L � a � a @ 0 a� ~ c� rn d Q > a) aa) E 2 0 = E X E J Z E 0 2 m a) o @ a) @ 0 Z —a) D : 0 C 0 @ @ @ @ @ N O _1 C p ?: a) @ 0 CC @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a) d @ L O 7 G m (3 J J J J J J d () 00- N = (n AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT NE111116. AVENUE- 7-0 EXCBLLENCE April 22, 2010 1 Department of Planning Services City of Kent 400 West Gowe St. Kent WA 98032 To Whom It May Concern; Enclosed are the Determination of Non-Significance ("DNS") and the Environmental Checklist for the adoption of the Auburn School District 2010 Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan. The comment period on the DNS expires at 4:00 p.m. on May 10, 2010. Sincerely jhael Ne a eputySupen endent Business and Operations Enclosures 915 Fourth Street Northeast Auburn,WA 98002 (253)931-4930 DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Issued with a 14-day comment and appeals period 1 Description of Proposal. This threshold determination analyzes the environmental impacts associated with the following actions, which are so closely related to each other that they are in effect a single course of action• 1. The adoption of the Auburn School District's 2010-2016 Capital Facilities Plan by the Auburn School District No 408 for the purposes of planning for the facilities needs of the District; and 2. The amendment of the Comprehensive Plans of King County and the cities of Auburn and Kent to include the Auburn School District's 2010-2016 Capital Facilities Plan as part of the Capital Facilities Element of each jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan. The cities of Algona and Pacific may also amend their Comprehensive Plans to include the Auburn School District's Capital Facilities Plan as part of the Capital Facilities Element of each jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan - Proponent: Auburn School District No. 408 Location of the Proposal: The Auburn School District includes an area of approximately 57 square miles. The Cities of Auburn, Algona, Kent, and Pacific and parts of unincorporated King and Pierce Counties fall within the District's boundaries. Lead Agency: Auburn School District No 408 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse environmental impact on the environment An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43 21 C 030(2)(c). This decision was made after a review of the completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public upon request. i t This Determination ofNonsignificance (DNS) is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date of issue Comments must be submitted by 4 00 p in., May 10, 2010. The responsible official will reconsider the DNS based on timely comments and may retain, modify, or, if significant adverse impacts are likely, withdraw the DNS. If the DNS is retained, it will be final after the expiration of the comment deadline. Responsible Official: Mike Newman Deputy Superintendent, Business and Operations Auburn School District No 408 Telephone: (253) 931-4930 Address: Auburn School District 915 4`" Street N.E. Auburn, WA 98002 You may appeal this determination in writing by 4 00 p.m., May 10, 2010, to Mike Newman, Deputy Superintendent, Auburn School District No. 408, 915 4`h Street N E., Auburn, WA 98002 Date of Issue- April 23, 2010 Date Published: April 23, 2010 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAC 197-11-960 Environmental Checklist. Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43 21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you tThe checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply". In addition, complete the Supplemental Sheet for non- project actions (part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: The adoption of the Auburn School District's 2010 Capital Facilities Plan ("Capital Facilities Plan") for the purposes of planning for the District's facilities needs The cities of Auburn and Kent and the King County Comprehensive Plans will be amended to include the Auburn School District 2010 Capital Facilities Plan in the Capital Facilities Element of each jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan The Cities of Algona and Pacific Comprehensive Plans may be amended to include the Auburn School District 2010 Capital Facilities Plan in the Capital Facilities Element of each jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan A copy of the District's Capital Facilities Plan is available for review in the District's offices. 2. Name of applicant: j Auburn School District No. 408. 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Auburn School District No. 408 915 4`h St. N.E. Auburn, WA 98002 Contact Person: Mike Newman, Deputy Superintendent, Business/Operations Telephone: (253) 931-4930 4. Date checklist prepared: April 6, 2010 2 5. Agency requesting checklist. Auburn School District No. 408. 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): The Capital Facilities Plan is scheduled to be adopted by the District on May 10, 2010. After adoption, the District will forward the Capital Facilities Plan to the cities of Auburn, Algona, Kent, and Pacific, and to King County for inclusion in each jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan. The Capital Facilities Plan will be updated annually Site-specific projects will be subject to project-level environmental review. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. The Capital Facilities Plan sets forth the capital improvement projects that the District plans to implement over the next six years. The District plans to purchase property for and construct a new middle school and a new elementary school over the next six years to meet projected student population increases. The District may also add portable facilities at existing school sites. The District will also conduct facility improvements at existing school sites throughout the District. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have undergone or will undergo additional environmental review, when appropriate, as they are developed. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain None known. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. The cities of Auburn and Kent will review and adopt the Capital Facilities Plan for the purposes of updating the cities' school impact fees and incorporating the updated Plan as a part of the Capital Facilities Elements of both the Auburn and Kent Comprehensive Plans King County will review the Plan for the purposes of implementing the County's impact fee ordinance and incorporating the Plan as a part of the Capital Facilities Element of the King County Comprehensive Plan. 3 1 11. Give a brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description ) This is a nonproject action. This proposal involves the adoption of the Auburn School District's 2010 Capital Facilities Plan for the purpose of planning the District's facilities needs. This proposal also involves the amendment of the cities of Auburn and Kent Comprehensive Plans and the King County Comprehensive Plan to include the Auburn School District 2010 Capital Facilities Plan as a part of each jurisdiction's Capital Facilities Element of their Comprehensive Plans 12. Location of the proposal Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address if any, and section, township, and range, if known If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s) Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The 2010 Capital Facilities Plan will affect the Auburn School District. The District includes an area of approximately 57 square miles. The Cities of Auburn, Algona, Kent, and Pacific and parts of unincorporated King County fall within the District's boundaries. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one) Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other The Auburn School District is comprised of a variety of topographic landforms and gradients. Specific topographic characteristics of the sites at which the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan are located have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. t 1 4 b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Specific slope characteristics at the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-level environmental reN iew. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland Specific soil types found at the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Unstable sods may exist within the Auburn School District. Specific soil limitations on individual project sites have been or will be identified at the time of project-level environmental review when appropriate. e Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject, when appropriate, to project-level environmental review and local approval at the time of proposal Proposed grading projects, as well as the purpose, type, quantity, and source of any fill materials to be used have been or will be identified at that time. f Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. It is possible that erosion could occur as a result of the construction projects currently proposed in the Capital Facilities Plan The erosion impacts of the individual projects have been or will be evaluated on a site-specific basis at the time of project-level environmental review when appropriate. Individual projects have been or will be subject to local approval processes. 5 g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings?) The construction projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have required or will require the construction of impervious surfaces The extent of any impervious cover constructed will vary with each project included in the Capital Facilities Plan. This issue has been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any- The erosion potential of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan and appropriate control measures have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Relevant erosion reduction and control requirements have been or will be met 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Various emissions, many construction-related, may result from the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan. The air-quality impacts of each project have been or will be evaluated during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. b Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe Any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project- level environmental review when appropriate c Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any The individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject to project-level environmental review and relevant local approval processes when appropriate The District has been or will be required to comply with all 6 t applicable air regulations and air permit requirements. Proposed measures specific to the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. There is a network of surface water bodies within the Auburn School District. The surface water bodies that are in the immediate vicinity of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. When necessary, the surface water regimes and flow patterns have been or will be researched and incorporated into the designs of the individual projects. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may require work near the surface waters located within the Auburn School District. Applicable local approval requirements have been or will be satisfied. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area jof the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material Information with respect to the placement or removal of fill and dredge material as a component of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be provided during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Applicable local regulations have been or will be satisfied. 7 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known Any surface water withdrawals or diversions required to connection with the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Each project included in the Capital Facilities Plan, if located in a floodplam area, has been or will be required to meet applicable local regulations for flood areas. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. Specific information regarding the discharge of waste materials that may be required as a result of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be provided during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions b. Ground: 1) Will groundwater be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may impact groundwater resources. The impact of the individual projects included to the Capital Facilities Plan on groundwater resources has been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Each project has been or will be subject to applicable local regulations Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . ., agricultural, etc ). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve 8 The discharges of waste material that may take place in connection with the projects included in the Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known) Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may have stormwater runoff consequences. Specific information regarding the stormwater impacts of each project has been or will be provided during project-level environmental review when appropriate Each project has been or will be subject to applicable local stormwater regulations 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may result in the discharge of waste materials into ground or surface waters. The specific impacts of each project on ground and surface waters have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Each project has been or will be subject to all applicable regulations regarding the discharge of waste materials into ground and surface waters. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any. Specific measures to reduce or control runoff impacts associated with the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. M9 4. Plants: a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree. fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation A variety of vegetative zones are located within the Auburn School District. Inventories of the vegetation located on the sites of the projects proposed in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be developed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Some of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may require the removal or alteration of vegetation The specific impacts on vegetation of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. The specific impacts to these species from the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be determined during project-level environmental review when appropriate. d Proposed landscaping, use of native plans, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any Measures to preserve or enhance vegetation at the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate Each project is or will be subject to applicable local landscaping requirements. 10 5. Animals: a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds. hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other, mammals deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish. bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other. An inventory of species that have been observed on or near the sites of the projects proposed in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be developed during project- level environmental review when appropriate. b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Inventories of threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be developed during project-level environmental review when appropriate c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. The impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan on migration routes have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate > d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: t Appropriate measures to preserve or enhance wildlife have been or will be determined during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 6. Energy and Natural Resources: a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc The State Board of Education requires the completion of a life-cycle cost analysis of all heating, lighting, and insulation systems before it will permit specific school projects to proceed The energy needs of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be determined at the time of specific engineering and site 11 design planning when appropriate Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions b Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe The impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan on the solar potential of adjacent projects have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Energy conservation measures proposed in connection with the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be considered during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 7. Environmental Health- a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan comply or will comply with all current codes, standards, rules, and regulations. Individual projects have been or will be subject to project-level environmental review and local approval at the time they are developed, when appropriate. 12 b. Noise: 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example traffic, equipment, operation, other)? A variety of noises from traffic, construction, residential, commercial, and industrial areas exists within the Auburn School District. The specific noise sources that may affect the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may create normal construction noises that will exist on short-term bases only The construction projects could increase traffic around the construction sites on a short-term basis Because the construction of additional school capacity will increase the capacity of the District's school facilities, this project may create a slight increase in traffic-related or operations-related noise on a long-term basis. Similarly, the placement of portables at school sites will increase the capacity of school facilities and may create a slight increase in traffic-related or operations-related noise. Neither of these potential increases is expected to be significant. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: The projected noise impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be evaluated and mitigated during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Each project is or will be subject to applicable local regulations. 8. Land and Shoreline Use: a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? There are a variety of land uses within the Auburn School District, including residential, commercial, industrial, institutional, utility, open space, recreational, etc. 13 b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. The known sites for the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have not been used recently for agriculture. c. Describe any structures on the site The structures located on the sites for the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified and described during project-level environmental review when appropriate. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? The structures that will be demolished as a result of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan, if any, have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? The sites that are covered under the Capital Facilities Plan have a variety of zoning classifications under the applicable zoning codes. Site-specific zoning information has been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. i f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Inventories of the comprehensive plan designations for the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be completed during project- level environmental review when appropriate. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Shoreline master program designations of the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 14 h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify Any environmentally sensitive areas located on the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review i Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? The Auburn School District currently serves approximately 14,073 full-time equivalent ("FTE") students. Enrollment is expected to increase to approximately I16,218 FTE students by the 2015-2016 school year. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Any displacement of people caused by the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be evaluated during project-level environmental review when appropriate However, it is not anticipated that the Capital Facilities Plan, or any of the projects contained therein, will displace any people. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject to project-level environmental review and local approval when appropriate. Proposed mitigating measures have been or will be developed at that time, when necessary. I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The compatibility of the specific projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan with existing uses and plans has been or will be assessed as part of the comprehensive planning process and during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 9. Housing: a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. No housing units would be provided in connection with the completion of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan. 15 b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. It is not anticipated that the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will eliminate any housing units. The impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan on existing housing have been or will be evaluated during project-level environmental review when appropriate. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Measures to reduce or control any housing impacts caused by the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate 10 Aesthetics: a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including T antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? The aesthetic impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? The aesthetic impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Appropriate measures to reduce or control the aesthetic impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be determined on a project- level basis when appropriate ', 16 11. Light and Glare: a What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? The light or glare impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review, when appropriate. b Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? The light or glare impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Off-site sources of light or glare that may affect the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be evaluated during project-level environmental review when appropriate d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any Proposed measures to mitigate light and glare impacts have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 12. Recreation: a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? There are a variety of formal and informal recreational facilities within the Auburn School District b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. The recreational impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. ' � 17 The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan, including proposed new school facilities, may enhance recreational opportunities and uses c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any. Adverse recreational effects of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject to mitigation during project-level environmental review when appropriate. School facilities usually provide recreational facilities to the community in the form of play fields and gymnasiums. 13 Historic and Cultural Preservation, a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. There are no known places or objects listed on, or proposed for, such registers for the project sites included in the Capital Facilities Plan. The existence of historic and cultural resources on or next to the sites has been or will be addressed in detail during project-level environmental review when appropriate. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. An inventory of historical sites at or near the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be developed during project-level environmental review when appropriate c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Appropriate measures will be proposed on a project-level basis when appropriate. 14 Transportation: a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system Show on site plans, if any. The impact on public streets and highways of the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 18 t b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? The relationship between the specific projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan and public transit has been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Inventories of parking spaces located at the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan and the impacts of specific projects on parking availability have been or will be conducted during project-level environmental review when appropriate d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). The need for new streets or roads, or improvements to existing streets and roads has been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe Use of water, rail, or air transportation has been or will be addressed during project- level environmental review when appropriate f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. The traffic impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any The mitigation of traffic impacts associated with the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 19 15. Public Services: a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe The Distnct does not anticipate that the projects identified in the Capital Facilities Plan will significantly increase the need for public services. b Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. New school facilities have been or will be built with automatic security systems, fire alarms, smoke alarms, heat sensors, and sprinkler systems. 16 Utilities: a. Circle utilities currently available at the site- electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other Electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, and sanitary sewer utilities are available at the known sites of the projects included m the Capital Facilities Plan. The types of utilities available at specific project sites have been or will be addressed in more detail during project-level environmental review when appropriate. b Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed Utility revisions and construction needs have been or will be identified during project- level environmental review when appropriate f i � r i 20 C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision Signature. Date Submitted: a 21 D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented Respond briefly and in general terms. , 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air, production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? To the extent the Capital Facilities Plan makes it more likely that school facilities, including new high school, middle school and elementary school capacity, will be constructed, some of these environmental impacts will be more likely Additional impermeable surfaces, such as roofs, access roads, and sidewalks could increase stormwater runoff, which could enter surface or ground waters. Heating systems, emergency generators, and other school equipment that is installed pursuant to the Capital Facilities Plan could result in air emissions. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan should not require the production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances, with the possible exception of the storage of diesel fuel or gasoline for emergency generating equipment. The District does not anticipate a significant increase in the production of noise from its facilities, although the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will increase the District's student capacities. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Proposed measures to mitigate any such increases described above have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate Stormwater detention and runoff will meet applicable County and/or City requirements and may be subject to National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ("NPDES") permitting requirements. Discharges to air will meet applicable air pollution control requirements Fuel oil will be stored in accordance with local and state requirements. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine ' life? The Capital Facilities Plan itself will have no impact on these elements of the environment The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may require clearing plants off of the project sites and a loss to animal habitat These impacts have been or i 22 will be addressed in more detail during project-level environmental review when appropriate. The projects included in the Plan are not likely to generate significant impacts on fish or marine life. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are. Specific measures to protect and conserve plants, animals, and fish cannot be identified at this time Specific mitigation proposals will be identified, however, during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources The construction of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will require the consumption of energy. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be constructed in accordance with applicable energy efficiency standards 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? The Capital Facilities Plan and individual projects contained therein should have no impact on these resources. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: No specific measures are being proposed at this time. Appropriate measures would be proposed during project-specific review Annual updates of this Plan will be coordinated with the Cities of Auburn, Algona, Kent, and Pacific, and King County as part of the Growth Management Act process, one of the purposes of which is to protect environmentally sensitive areas. To the extent the School District's facilities planning process is part of the overall Growth Management planning process, these resources are more likely to be protected. 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? The Capital Facilities Plan will not have any impact on land or shoreline use that is incompatible with existing comprehensive plans, land use codes, or shoreline 23 �i management plans The District does not anticipate that the Capital Facilities Plan or the projects contained therein will directly affect land and shoreline uses in the area served by the District. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: j No measures to avoid or reduce land use impacts resulting from the Capital Facilities Plan or the projects contained therein are proposed at this time. 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? The construction projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may create temporary increases in the District's need for public services and utilities. The new school facilities will increase the District's demands on transportation and utilities. These increases are not expected to be significant. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: ' No measures to reduce or respond to such demands are proposed at this time. 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment The Capital Facilities Plan will not conflict with any laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. i f � 24 31405 18th Ave.So. Federal Way,WA 0 ® Federal Way 98003-5433 Public Schools Tel 253.945 2000 w fwps org 1 July 15, 2010 Charlene Anderson City of Kent 220 South 4"'Avenue Kent WA 98032 Dear Charlene, Enclosed is a copy of the Federal Way Public Schools' 2011 Capital Facilities Plan. The Federal Way Public Schools' Board of Education adopted this plan on May 25, 2010. This plan is also available as a PDF if you prefer a paperless copy. - re-c' The Federal Way Public Schools' Board of Education Resolution No. 2010-28 directs the Superintendent to submit the adopted Federal Way Public Schools' 2011 Capital Facilities Plan to the City of Kent. A copy of the resolution is enclosed for your files. The expenditure report for the 2009 calendar year is also enclosed. Please let me know if you have any questions about the changes in the CFP for Federal Way Public Schools My direct line is (253) 945-2071 or email at tnascimeRWw-Ps.org. Sincerely, Tanya Nascimento Enrollment and Demographic Analyst Enclosure: 3 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS School District No. 210 - Kin County tY 31405 - 18th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003 RESOLUTION NO. 2010-28 A RESOLUTION of the Board of Education of the Federal Way School District No. 210, to provide to the City of Kent the 2011 Capital Facilities Plan. WHEREAS, the Federal Way School District Board of Education hereby provides to the City of Kent the District's 2011 Capital Facilities Plan, documenting present and future school facility requirements of the District, and WHEREAS, the Plan contains all elements required by the Growth Management Act and City of Kent Ordinance No. 3260, which addresses concurrency, allows each school district to establish their own standards of service, and provides for future school impact fees. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Superintendent be authorized and directed to submit the adopted 2011 Capital Facilities Plan to the City of Kent ADOPTED this 25th day of May, 2010. LBoard Secre a — Dir Dire or Dir or Director G� Director June 15, 2010 Charlene Anderson Planning Manager City of Kent Planning Department 220 S 4th Ave Kent WA 98032 Dear Ms. Anderson, Enclosed you will find a copy of the Environmental Checklist and the accompanying Determination of Non-Significance for the Federal Way School District's 2011 Capital Facilities Plan. The 14-day comment period to submit written comments or to appeal the decision begins on April 7, 2010 and will continue through 5 00 PM, April 21, 2010. Please let me know if you have any questions or need any additional information. Sincerely, Tanya Nascimento Enrollment and Demographic Analyst FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS _i 2011 i CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN - Lakeland Elementary t. .."i .yH `Y � .a � t I• Sunnycrest Elementa -,"F� "-, ' X .ate 1` Pi'ia�. • .aj4�4p�6'�u��+5:.r a.,,.-� ry »y , .'..'�`+�^ �qr•r 1' t. w G..a}t�•� -a -i"=Frio —�"'_ _ _ ^_ _ a"...:F,�..�"`„a;=;» = •.."v1W+.Y i4iwa>_.c '�x"ti.' _ ".... .,u.+a:- ... FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2011 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 1 BOARD OF EDUCATION Tony Moore, President Angela Griffin, Vice President Ed Barney, Director Amye Bronson-Doherty, Director Suzanne Smith, Director SUPERINTENDENT Thomas R Murphy Prepared by. Sally D. McLean Tanya Nascimento FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2011 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS ' TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 ' INTRODUCTION 2-3 SECTION 1 THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Introduction 4 Inventory of Educational Facilities 5 Inventory of Non-Instructional Facilities 6 Needs Forecast- Existing Facilities 7 Needs Forecast - New Facilities 8 Six Year Finance Plan 9 SECTION 2 MAPS OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES Introduction 11 Map - Elementary Boundaries 12 Map - Middle School Boundaries 13 Map - High School Boundaries 14 SECTION 3 SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION ' Introduction 15 Building Capacities 16-17 Portable Locations 18-19 Student Forecast 20-22 Capacity Summaries 23-27 King County Impact Fee Calculations 28-30 SECTION 4 SUMMARY OF CHANGES FROM THE 2010 31-33 , PLAN 1 , FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2011 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN INTRODUCTION ' In response to the requirements of the State of Washington Growth Management Act (SHB)2929 (1990) and ESHB 1025 (1991)), and under the School Impact Fee Ordinances of King County Code 21A, City of Federal Way Ordinance No. 95-249 ' effective December 21, 1995 as amended, City of Kent Ordinance No 3260 effective March 1996, and the City of Auburn Ordinance No 5078 effective 1998, Federal Way Public Schools has updated its 2011 Capital Facilities Plan as of May 2010 This Plan is scheduled for adoption by King County, the City of Kent, City of Federal Way and the City of Auburn and is incorporated in the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction by reference. This plan is also included in the Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. To date, the City of Des Moines has not adopted a school impact fee ordinance The City of Des Moines collects school impact fees as part of the SEPA process. The Growth Management Act requires the County to designate Urban Growth areas within which urban growth can be encouraged The Growth Management Planning Council adopted and recommended to the King County Council four Urban Growth Area Line Maps with designations for urban centers. A designation was made within the Federal Way planning area, which encompasses Federal Way Public Schools boundaries. King County will encourage and actively support the development of Urban Centers to meet the region's need for housing, jobs, services, culture, and recreation. This Plan's estimated population growth is prepared with this underlying assumption. This Capital Facilities Plan will be used as documentation for any jurisdiction, which ' requires its use to meet the needs of the Growth Management Act. This plan is not intended to be the sole planning tool for all of the District needs The District may prepare interim plans consistent with Board policies or management need. The District has prepared a multi-phase plan for the renovation and construction of Federal Way Schools and support buildings The Board authorized presenting the $149 million bond on May 15, 2007 The bond, passed at 63 93%, will replace four elementary schools, Lakeland, Panther Lake, Sunnycrest and Valhalla and one middle school, Lakota ' Plans to replace Federal Way High School and Decatur High School and to increase capacity by approximately 400 students at each school are planned in later phases Federal Way High School was built in 1938 It has been added onto at least 10 times and currently has an almost maze-like layout Based on an annual 4% increase in construction cost, the estimated cost to rebuild Federal Way High School is $122 million. Estimated construction costs will be re-calculated prior to the next bond election None of the cost to replace Federal Way or Decatur High School is included in the Impact Fee calculation in this Plan The non-instructional projects included in the plan will consolidate support services operations at a single location. The current Transportation and Maintenance facility cannot continue to meet the District needs in the future Nutrition services and other administrative functions will also relocate to this centralized location. 2 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2011 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN , Construction of Panther Lake & Valhalla has been completed and students began the ' 2009-10 school year in the new buildings. Lakota Middle School will be completed this summer and students will begin the upcoming school year in the new school The , District will be awarding bids for Sunnycrest & Lakeland in May & June and construction for both sites will begin this summer During the construction of Sunnycrest, students will be served at an off-site location In Fall 2010, the District will offer the Middle Years 113 program at Totem& Kilo. The Middle Years IB programs will require students to take a foreign language in addition to the core subjects currently offered at the middle schools In Fall 2011, the district will implement a dual-language program at Sunnycrest The dual-language program will offer opportunities for students to engage in bilingual learning. The program will begin with a K-1 program adding a new grade level each year Each grade level will require three classrooms. The District continues to monitor factors that may have an impact on enrollment and ' capacity at our schools One such factor is HB 2261, which will phase in full-day kindergarten for all students The District will follow this bill as it progresses and assess , the possible facility impact this bill may create Another factor would be the inclusion of a Program of Early Learning for at risk children within the overall Program of Basic Education. According to the projections provided by the Puget Sound Educational Service District, Federal Way was projected to have 1,219 children eligible for Head Start, Early Head Start and ECEAP in 2009 Funded capacity for these programs is only 321 leaving 898 children unserved If a bill including Early Learning as a part of the ' Program of Basic Education were to pass, there would be a significant impact to the capacity of our schools We will also continue to study school boundaries as new housing and fluctuating populations impact specific schools. Some shifts in boundaries may be required in the coming years. 3 ' FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2011 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN ' SECTION 1 - THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN The State Growth Management Act requires that several pieces of information be gathered to determine the facilities available and needed to meet the needs of a growing community. This section provides information about current facilities, existing facility needs, and expected future facility requirements for Federal Way Public Schools A Financial Plan that shows expected funding for any new construction, portables and modernization listed follows this. 1 ' 4 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2011 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN , INVENTORY OF EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES ' ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS Adelaide 1635 SW 304" St Federal Way 98023 Brigadoon 3601 SW 336" St Federal Way 98023 ' Camelot 4041 S 2981" St Auburn 98001 Enterprise 35101 5t"Ave SW Federal Way 98023 ' Green Gables 32607 47'11 Ave SW Federal Way 98023 Lake Dolloff 4200 S 3081" St Auburn 98001 Lake Grove 303 SW 3081" St Federal Way 98023 , Lakeland 35827 32"d Ave S Auburn 98001 Mark Twain 2450 S Star Lake Rd Federal Way 98003 Meredith Hill 5830 S 300t" St Auburn 98001 Mirror Lake 625 S 314t" St Federal Way 98003 Nautilus (K-8) 1000 S 289" St Federal Way 98003 Olympic View 2626 SW 327" St Federal Way 98023 Panther Lake 34424 1st Ave S Federal Way 98003 Rainier View 3015 S 368" St Federal Way 98003 Sherwood Forest 34600 12t" Ave SW Federal Way 98023 Silver Lake 1310 SW 325" PI Federal Way 98023 Star Lake 4014 S 270" St Kent 98032 Sunnycrest* 24629 42"d Ave S Kent 98032 Twin Lakes 4400 SW 320" St Federal Way 98023 Valhalla 27847 42"d Ave S Auburn 98001 , Wildwood 2405 S 300" St Federal Way 98003 Woodmont(K-8) 26454 16'h Ave S Des Moines 98198 ' MIDDLE SCHOOLS Federal Way Public Academy(6-10) 34620 91"Ave S Federal Way 98003 Illahee 36001 1"Ave S Federal Way 98003 , Kilo 4400 S 308'h St Auburn 98001 Lakota 1415 SW 314" St Federal Way 98023 Sacalawea 1101 S Dash Point Rd Federal Way 98003 ' Saghahe 33914 191" Ave SW Federal Way 98023 Sequoyah 3450 S 360" ST Auburn 98001 , Totem 26630 40`' Ave S Kent 98032 TAF Academy (6-12) 26630 40" Ave S Kent 98032 HIGH SCHOOLS ' Decatur 2800 SW 320" St Federal Way 98023 Federal Way 30611 16t" Ave S Federal Way 98003 Thomas Jefferson 4248 S 288t1i St Auburn 98001 ' Todd Beamer 35999 161" Ave S Federal Way 98003 Career Academy at Truman 31455 281" Ave S Federal Way 98003 , ALTERNATIVE SCHOOLS Merit School 36001 1"Ave S Federal Way 98003 Internet Academy 31455 28t" Ave S Federal Way 98003 Employment Transition Program 33250 21"Ave SW Federal Way 98023 *During the construction of the new school,Sunnycrest will be relocated to 440 S 186"St,Bunen 98148 5 ' FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2011 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CURRENT INVENTORY NON-INSTRUCTIONAL FACILITIES Developed Property Administrative Building 31405 18`" Ave S Federal Way 98003 MOT Site 1066 S 320" St Federal Way 98003 Central Kitchen 1344 S 308"i St Federal Way 98003 ' Federal Way Memorial Field 1300 S 308" St Federal Way 98003 Northwest Center 33330 81" Ave S Federal Way 98003 1 Leased Space Community Resource Center 1813 S Commons Federal Way 98003 Student Support Annex 32020 1 s" Ave S Federal Way 98003 Notes: In July 2011, the Administrative Building, Community Resource Center, and Student Support Annex will be relocated to the Northwest Center. The leases for the Community Resource Center and the Student Support Annex will end in August 2011 In 2010, construction will begin on Site 81. The MOT Site & Central Kitchen will be relocated to this site when construction is complete The Administration Building and MOT Site have been surplussed and will be marketed for sale. Undeveloped Property Site Location ' 75 SW 360th Street& 3rd Avenue SW—9 2 Acres 65 S 351 st Street & 52nd Avenue S — 8.8 Acres 60 E of loth Avenue SW - SW 334th & SW 335`" Streets - 10.04 Acres 73 N of SW 320`" and east of 45"' PL SW— 23 45 Acres 71 S 344th Street & 46th Avenue S - 17.47 Acres 82 15"Way S and S 342"d St—Minimal acreage 96 S 308" St and 14"' Ave S — 36 Acres 81 S 332"d St and 9"i Ave S — 20 Acres Notes: Not all undeveloped properties are large enough to meet school construction requirements Properties may be traded or sold depending on what locations are needed to house students in the District. 6 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2011 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN ' NEEDS FORECAST - EXISTING FACILITIES ' EXISTING FACILITY FUTURE NEEDS ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF FUNDS ' Purchase and Relocate Interim Capacity Anticipated source of funds is Portables Impact Fees Elementary Schools- Replace Existing Buildings Voter approved bonds Lakeland, Panther Lake, Increase capacity at Lakeland, Sunnycrest and Valhalla Panther Lake, Sunnycrest and Valhalla by a total of 200 seats Lakota Middle School Replace Existing Building Voter approved bonds Federal Way High School Replace Existing Building, Future bond authorization Increase Capacity Decatur High School Replace Existing Building, Future bond authorization. Increase Ca acit The District is also planning the replacement of some non-instructional facilities. The District has purchased 20 acres (Site #81) for construction of consolidated facilities for support services functions Transportation, Nutrition Services, Maintenance and other non-instructional functions will be housed at this centralized location. As part of the multi-phase plan, the District intends to increase capacity for high school students with expansion at the Decatur High School site Increased capacity at Federal Way High and at Decatur High in later phases supplant the need for construction of a fifth comprehensive high school. 7 ' FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2011 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 1 NEEDS FORECAST - ADDITIONAL FACILITIES NEW FACILITY LOCATION ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF FUNDS No current plans for additional facilities. 1 1 i t 1 1 1 1 1 8 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O o � � oa ao � ao .r. � re us vi `o us zs in uz s`ii � F `A o coo ' O O O O p O G O C 0 0� O O W N O• al � W N N 44 V a ' K: N p � N N CIO c W O 4 F LL U. V1 to V1 O .Mn N N 3 S = W H O O C Ll 1 11 ILLv o rn c E_ E v u E a _ a U Qn N F�CD z, � '1 Eas c �/ N 9 N V 0• V W N 9 O ? 0 0 0 O 3 >` .. y Y Ltr b y.� c •. o c o 0 0 0 ^� = � E .i°j a u o o c r �' sue., i 06 rz vz rn Q o y 3 ti o a o '+ xr r r e Ld O Z u, o o ?L � o o a u S .- � a U G C2 � :7 F- tFEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2011 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN ' SECTION 2 - MAPS OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES Federal Way Public Schools has twenty-one elementary schools (grades K-5), two schools with a K-8 grade configuration, seven middle school schools (grades 6-8), four high schools (grades 9-12) and three small secondary schools The Federal Way Public Academy serves students in grades 6-10. The TAF Academy serves students in grades 6- 12 who reside in the Totem Middle School service area The Career Academy at Truman ' High School serves students in grades 9-12. The Internet Academy serves grades K42. The following maps show the service area boundaries for each school, by school type. ' (Career Academy at Truman High School, Merit School, Internet Academy and Federal Way Public Academy serve students from throughout the District) The identified boundaries are reviewed annually. Any change in grade configuration or adoption of programs that affect school populations may necessitate a change in school service areas. The Growth Management Act requires that a jurisdiction evaluate if the public facility infrastructure is in place to handle new housing developments. In the case of most public facilities, new development has its major impact on the facilities immediately adjacent to that development School Districts are different If the District does not have permanent facilities available, interim measures must be taken until new facilities can be built or until boundaries can be adjusted to match the population changes to the surrounding facilities. ' Adjusting boundaries requires careful consideration by the District and is not taken lightly. It is recognized that there is a potential impact on students who are required to change schools. Boundary adjustments impact the whole district, not just one school. It is important to realize that a single housing development does not require the construction of a complete school facility. School districts are required to project growth throughout the district and build or adjust boundaries based on growth throughout the district, not just around a single development 11 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2011 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN ' ELEMENTARY SCHOOL BOUND ,ARIES -_ B emeMary Schools U, p - Nam 1 Adelaide 2 Bngadoon 3 Camelot i 4 Enterprise 5 Green Gables.;, S Lake Do lloff 7 Lake Owe 8 Lakeland 9 Mark Twain 10 Meredith Hill ��' - > }- — �-` 11 Mirror Lake 12 Nautilus(IV8) 13 Otympic View 14 Panther Lake v 15 RamierVew may;' r3i 10 Sh ervuo od Forest 17 Saber Lab e 18 Star Lake 19 Su nnperest 20 Twin Laces i 21 Valhalla ' 22 Wddwoad 23 Woodmont(148) Mddle Schools «� t High Schools Admmctratroe Buildings Un deael aped Sit �j Tit 17 /' 7 N .+ 6-j,.,f�� t I 12 , tFEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2011 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN MIDDLE SCHOOL BOUNDARIES L Mddle Schoolst pr rI {7 � Name -+ , 4.... ��-- T' j - 35 FedeFal Way Public Acadertry 3] Illahee -c+'�� � t 31 Kilo { "T y 33 Saoalanea 34 SaghaheAk- 37 Sequoyah �y —•"I� 35 Totem '� F �=' 3 1 11� Elementary Schools i ' w High Schools ( - Adminatratx Buildings Undeoeloped Sdes ��t k . I ��, r _ �'„ r �.�, `tom,�_,'-`ja'-•-., " -1`': _. _ 'ZI, � •it j � �_ `tIt �Y 37 �--r, ; W�E 13 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2011 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN ' HIGH SCHOOL BOUNDARIES Hgh Schools Nam �43 Decatur U'I'h 41 Federal Way 421 Thomas Jetfe man - 45 Todd Beamer 4BD Career Academy at Truman 51 Employment Trans Ruin Program Elementary Schools , Made Schools Illi;; Admin¢trabve Buildings ' Dn deoelopetl Sites v i ` i 41 tj Y •j lv\< = l Vill ,f- 14 ' FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2011 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 3 - SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION Building Capacities - The Education Program Portable Locations Student Forecast— 2011 through 2017 Capacity Summaries King County Impact Fees - Single and Multi-Family Units 15 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2011 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN ' Building Capacities , This Capital Facilities Plan establishes the District's "standard of service" in order to ascertain the District's current and future capacity The Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, but these guidelines do not take into consideration the education program needs. In general, the District's current target class size provides that the average class size for a standard classroom for grades K through 2 should be 20 students. In grades 3-5 the target is 25 students For grades 6 to 12 the target class size is 26 students. Classrooms for students with Individualized Education Program (Special Education) needs are calculated at t2 seats per classroom. Using the OSPI square footage calculation as a base line, the District has calculated a program capacity for all schools A recent Study & Survey was the basis for changes to the OSPI building report The following list clarifies the adjustments to the OSPI calculation. Music Rooms: Each elementary school requires a standard classroom for music instruction. All Day Kindergarten: Every elementary school operates at least one all day Kindergarten program These all ' day Kindergarten program require additional capacity because the standard classroom is available for one all day session rather than two half day sessions The District will operate 52 sections of all day Kindergarten in 2010/11 Special Education Resource Rooms: Each elementary and middle school requires the use of a standard classroom(s) for special education students requiring instruction to address specific disabilities English as a Second Language Programs: Each elementary, middle school and high school requires the use of a standard classroom for students learning English as a second language. Middle School Computer Labs: Each middle school has computer labs. High School Career Development and Learning Center (Resource) Room: Each high school provides special education resource room and career development classrooms for students requiring instruction to address specific disabilities 16 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2011 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITIES ELEMENTARY BUILDING MIDDLE SCHOOL BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY PROGRAM CAPACITY School Name Headcount School Name Headcount FTE Adelaide 372 Illahee 855 864 Brigadoon 344 Kilo 827 835 Camelot 269 Lakota 707 714 Enterprise 458 Sacalawea 655 662 Green Gables 457 Sa hahe 804 812 Lake Dolloff 433 Se uoyah 569 575 Lake Grove 323 Totem 739 746 Lakeland 392 Federal Way Public Academy 209 211 Mark Twain 307 Technology Access Foundation Academy** Meredith Hill 453 2010 TOTAL 5,365 5,419 Mirror Lake 325 Nautilus(K-8) 347 Olympic View 328 *Middle School Average 737 744 Panther Lake 383 Rainier View 432 HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING Sherwood Forest 423 PROGRAM CAPACITY Silver Lake 410 Star Lake 361 School Name Headcount FTC Sunn crest 349 Decatur 1239 1,325 1 Twin Lakes 297 Federal Way 1528 1,634 Valhalla 449 Thomas Jefferson 1339 1,432 W ddwood 317 Todd Beamer 1133 1,212 Woodmont(K-8) 346 Career Academy at Truman 130 139 2010 TOTAL 8,575 Federal Way Public Academy 109 117 Employment Fiansition Program 48 51 Technology Access Foundation Academy** 1 Elementary Average 373 2010 TOTAL 5,526 5,910 ' *Hi h School Avera e 1,310 1 1,401 ' Notes * Federal Way Public Academy,Career Academy at Truman High School,and Employment Transition Program ' are non-boundary schools These schools are not used in the calculated averages **Technology Access Foundation Academy is housed entirely in portables on the Totem Middle School site 17 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2011 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Portable Locations The Washington State Constitution requires the State to provide each student a bask education It is not an efficient use of District resources to build a school with a capacity for 500 students due to lack of space for 25 students when enrollment fluctuates ' throughout the year and from year to year. Portables are used as temporary facilities or interim measures to house students when increasing population impacts a school attendance area Portables may also be required to house students when new or changing programs require additional capacity. They also provide temporary housing for students until permanent facilities can be financed and constructed When permanent facilities become available, the portable(s) is either used for other purposes such as storage or child care programs, or moved to another school for an interim classroom. Some portables may not be fit to move due to age or physical condition. In these cases, the District may choose to buy new portables and surplus these unfit portables It is the practice and philosophy of Federal Way Public Schools that portables are not acceptable as permanent facilities. The following page provides a list of the location of the portable facilities, used for temporary educational facilities by Federal Way Public Schools. 1 18 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2011 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PORTABLE LOCATIONS ' PORTABLESLOCATED PORTABLESLOCATED AT ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS AT HIGH SCHOOLS NON NON INSI RL(TION%L INSTRU(I IONAL INSTRUCTIONAL INSTRULI ZONAL Adelaide 1 2 Decatur 9 Bn adoon 1 Federal Wav 2 1 Camelot 1 Thomas Jefferson 10 Enterprise 2 1 Todd Beamer 9 Green Gables 1 TAF Academy 8 Lake Dolloff 1 1 TOTAL 38 1 Lake Grove 1 1 Lakeland 1 Mark Twain 2 1 Meredith Hill 1 2 Mirror Lake 4 PORTABLES LOCATED Nautilus I AT SUPPORT FACILITIES Olympic View 2 Panthei Lake MOT 1 Rainier View I 2 TDC 5 Sherwood Forest 3 1 TOTAL 6 Silver Lake 1 3 Star Lake 3 1 Sunnvcrest HEAD START PORTABLES AT DISTRICT SITES Twin Lakes 3 Valhalla ISherwood Forest I1 Wildwood 3 1 Woodmont 3 ITotal 1 TOTAL 31 21 PORTABLESLOCATED AT MIDDLE SCHOOLS NUN INSTRUCTIONn1 rvSTRI CTIUNnL Illahee 3 Kilo 7 Lakota Saca awea 3 Sa hahe 4 Se uo ah 1 Totem Mcrit 2 TAF Academy 6 1 23 4 19 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2011 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN ' Student Forecast Student enrollment projections are a basic component of budget development Enrollment projections influence many of the financial estimates that go into budget preparation. The majority of staffing requirements are derived directly from the forecasted number of students Allocations for instructional supplies and materials are also made on the basis of projected enrollment. Other expenditures and certain revenue projections are directly related to enrollment projections. Enrollment projections are completed annually in the Business Services Department. Projections must be detailed at various levels, district total, school-building totals, grade level and program level to include vocational and special education students. The basis of projections has been cohort survival analysis Cohort survival is the analysis ' of a group that has a common statistical value (grade level) as it progresses through time. In a stable population the cohort would be 1 00 for all grades This analysis uses historical information to develop averages and project the averages forward. This method does not trace individual students; it is concerned with aggregate numbers in each grade level. The district has used this method with varying years of history and weighted factors to study several projections Because transfers in and out of the school system are common, student migration is factored into the analysis as it increases or decreases survival rates Entry grades (kindergarten) are a unique problem in cohort analysis The district collects information on birth rates within the district's census tracts, and treats these statistics as a cohort for kindergarten enrollment in the appropriate years. The Federal Way School District is using various statistical methods for projecting student enrollments. The resultant forecasted enrollments are evaluated below. The first method is a statistical cohort analysis that produces ten distinct forecasts. These are forecast of enrollment for one year. The projections vary depending on the number of years of historical information and how they are weighted. A second method is a projection using an enrollment projection software package that allows the user to project independently at school or grade level and to aggregate these projections for the district level The Enrollment Master FM software provides statistical methods including trend line, standard grade progression (cohort) and combinations of these methods This software produces a five-year projection of school enrollment In December 2006, the District contracted a demographer to develop projections for the ' Federal Way School District. The report was complete in January 2007 The model used to forecast next year's enrollment uses cohort survival rates to measure grade to grade growth, assumes market share losses to private schools (consistent with county-wide average), assumes growth from new housing or losses due to net losses from migration. This forecast was provided as a range of three projections The long-range forecast provided with this report used a model with cohort survival rates and growth rates based on projected changes in the 5-19 age group for King County. Most of the methods used for long range enrollment reporting assume that enrollment is a constant percent of ' 20 1 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2011 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN something else (e.g. population) or that enrollment will mirror some projected trend for the school-age population over time. The report included 5 different calculations to provide a range of possible projections for the District to the year 2017. This model produces a projection that is between 23,000 and 24,000 when applied to the low, medium and high range modes. This provides a reasonable range for long-range planning and is consistent with estimates from various models. Long-range projections that establish the need for facilities are a modification of the 1 cohort survival method The cohort method of analysis becomes less reliable the farther out the projections are made The Federal Way School District long-range projections are studied annually The study includes mfornlation from the jurisdictional demographers as they project future housing and population in the region. The long-range projections used by Federal Way Public Schools reflect a similar age trend in student populations as the projections published by the Office of Financial Management for the State of Washington. Near term projections assume some growth from new housing, which is offset by current local economic conditions Current economic conditions do appear to be affecting enrollment This is reflected in the District's projections The District tracks new development from five permitting jurisdictions Long range planning assumes a student yield from proposed new housing consistent with historical growth patterns. Growth Management requires jurisdictions to plan for a minimum of twenty years. The Federal Way School District is a partner in this planning with the various jurisdictions comprising the school district geography These projections create a vision of the school ! district community in the future. 1 1 1 1 i 21 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2011 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN , Full Time Equivalent Enrollment History and Projections Simplified FTE(K Headcount= 5 FTE,Middle School FTE=99 Headcount,High School FTE= 935Headcount) Total K-12 Percent Calendar Yr School Year Elementary Middle School Senior High FTE Change 2005 2004-05 9,164 5,473 6,515 21,152 2006 2005-06 9,105 5,309 6,770 21,184 0.2% 2007 2006-07 9,022 5,261 6,754 21,037 -0.7% 2008 2007-08 8,912 5,167 6,637 20,716 -1.5% 2009 2008-09 8,865 5,155 6,456 20,476 -1.2% 2010 2009-10 8,738 5,119 6,594 20,451 -01% 2011 B2010-11 8,786 5,105 6,644 20,535 0.4% 2012 P2011-12 8,841 5,070 6,592 20,503 -0.2% 2013 P2012-13 8,932 5,022 6,552 20,506 0.0% 2014 P2013-14 9,036 4,997 6,562 20,595 0.4% 2015 P2014-15 9,121 5,040 6,526 20,687 0.4% 2016 P2015-16 9,197 5,115 6,481 20,793 0.5% 2017 P2016-17 9,302 5,160 6,446 20,908 0.6% *New Configuration Elementary K-5 Middle School 6-8 High School 9-12 Enrollment History and Six Year Forecast 22,000 21,000 20,000 c 0 o � v 19,000 m x a 18,000 0 O 17,000 16,000 15,000 r� c� 0Q 0 0� 0� � � S �OOOO O OO OOS O Op )O ' Oo, 00 Oa4 OcP 00 s l7FTE School Year 22 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2011 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Capacity Summaries All Grades, Elementary, Middle School, and High Schools The Capacity Summaries combine Building Capacity information and the Student Forecast information The result demonstrates the requirements for new or remodeled facilities and why there is a need for the District to use temporary facilities or interim measures The information is organized in spreadsheet format, with a page summarizing the entire District, and then evaluating capacity vs. number of students at elementary, middle school, and high school levels individually. The notes at the bottom of each spreadsheet provide information about what facilities are in place each year. 23 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2011 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARY-ALL GRADES Budget Projected- IL - Calendar Year 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 CAPACITY School Year 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 BUILDING PROGRAM HEADCOUNT CAPACITY 19,466 19,466 19,566 19,566 19,566 19,566 19,566 FTE CAPACITY m ' �` 19,904 19,904 20,004 20,004 20,004 20,004 20,004 Add or subtract changes to capacity Increase Capacity- Lakeland and Sunnycrest 100 Adjusted Program Headcount Capacity 1 19,466 19,566 1 19,566 19,566 19,566 1 19,566 19,566 Adjusted Program FTE Capacity 19,904 20,004 20,004 20,004 20,004 20,004 20,004 ENROLLMENT Basic FTE Enrollment 20,535 20,503 20,506 20,595 20,687 20,793 20,908 Internet Academy Enrollment(AAFTE) (315) (315) (315) (315) (315) (315) (315) Basic FTE Enrollment without Internet Academv 20,220 2 0,18 8 20,191 20,280 20372 20,478 20,593 SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) PROGRAM FTE CAPACITY (316) (184) (187) (276) (368) (474) (589) RELOCATABLE CAPACITY Current Portable Capacity 2 300 2,300 2,275 2,275 2,275 2,275 2,275 Deduct Portable Capacity (50) (25) Add New Portable Capacity 50 Adjusted Portable Capacity 2,300 2,275 2,275 2,275 2,275 2,275 2,275 SURPLUS OR(UN HOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE CAPACITY ` 1,994 2,041 2,088 1,999 1,967 1,861 1'686 24 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2011 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARY-ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS Budget Projected-- Calendar Year 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 CAPACITY School Year 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013;14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 BUILDING PROGRAM HEAD COUNT CAPACITY 8,575 8,575 8,675 8,675 8,675 8,675 8,675 FTE CAPACITY 8,575 8,575 8,675 8,675 8,675 8,675 8,67 1 Increase Capacity Lakeland and Snim crest 100 Adjusted Program Headcount Capacity 8,575 8,675 8,675 8 675 1 8,675 8,675 8,675 Adjusted Program FTE Capacity 1 8,575 8,675 8 675 8,675 1 8,675 8,675 8,675 ENROLLMENT Basic FTE Enrollment 8,786 8,841 8,932 9,036 9,121 9,197 9,302 2 Internet Academy (AAFTE) (36) (36) (36) (36) (36) (36) (36) Basic FTE Enrollment without Internet Academy 8.750 8,805 8,896 9,000 9,085 9,161 9.266 SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) PROGRAM CAPACITY (175) (130) (221) (325) (410) (486) (591) RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 3 Current Portable Capacity 775 725 700 700 700 700 700 Subtract portables from Lakeland&Sunnycrest (50) (25) Adjusted Portable Capacity 725 700 700 700 700 700 700 SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 550 570 479'' 375 29V 214 109 NOTES• 1. Increase Capacity at Lakeland,and Sunnycrest 2. Internet Academy students are included to projections but do not require full time use of school facilities 3 Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available This is a calculated number only The actual number of portables that will be used will be based on actual student population needs The District may begin to pull portables from the instructional inventory Age and condition of the portables will determine feasibility for continued instructional use. 25 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2011 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN A CAPACITY SUMMARY-MIDDLE SCHOOLS Budget Projected-- Calendar Year 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 CAPACITY School Year 2010/12 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2015/16 BUILDING PROGRAM HEADCOUNT CAPACITY 5,365 5,365 5,365 5,365 5,365 5,365 5,365 FTE CAPACITY 5,419 5,419 5,419 5,419 5,419 5,419 5,419 Add or subtract changes in capacity Adjusted Program Headcount Capacity 5,365 5,365 5,365 5,365 5,365 5,365 5,365 Adjusted Program FTE Capacity 5,419 5,419 5,4t9 5,419 5,419 5,419 5,419 ENROLLMENT Basic FTE Enrollment 5,105 5,070 5.022 4997 5.040 5,115 5,160 1 Internet Academy (AAFTE) (74) (74) (74) (74) (74) (74) (74) Basic FTE Enrollment without Internet Academy 5,031 4,996 4,948 4,923 4,966 5,041 5,086 SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) PROGRAM CAPACITY 388 423 471 496 453 378 333 RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 2 Current Portable Capacity 575 600 600 600 600 600 600 Add/Subtract portable capacity Add new portable capacity TAF Academy 25 Adjusted Portable Capacity 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 988 1,023 1,071 1,096 1,053 978 933 NOTES: 1 Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities ' 2 Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available This is a calculated number only The actual number of portables that will be used will be based on actual student population needs The District may begin to pull portables from the instructional inventory Age and condition of the poi tables will determine feasibility for continued instructional use 26 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2011 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Budget -- Projected- Calendar - Calendar Year 2011 2012 1 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 CAPACITY School Year 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013,14 2014115 2015/16 2016/17 BUILDING PROGRAM HEADCOUNT CAPACITY 5,526 5,526 5,526 5,526 5,526 5,526 5,526 FTE CAPACITY 5,910 5,910 5,910 5,910 5,910 5,910 5,910 Add or subtract changes in capacity Adjusted Program Headcount Capacity 5,526 5,526 5,526 5,526 5,526 5,526 5,526 Adjusted Program FTE Capacity 5,910 5,910 5,910 5,910 5,910 5,910 5,910 ENROLLMENT Basic FTE Enrollment 6,644 6,592 6,552 6,562 6,526 61481 61446 1 Internet Academy(AAFTE) (205) (205) (205) (205) (205) (205) (205) Basic Ed without Internet Academy =' ' ` ' ' 'I � 6,439 6,387 6,347 6,357 6,321 6,276 6,241 lSURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) PROGRAM CAPACITY (529) (477) (437) (447) (411) (366) (331) RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 2. Cuncnt Portable Capacity 950 975 975 975 975 975 975 Add/Subtract portable capacity Add portable capacity at TAF Academy 25 Adjusted Portable Capacity - 975 975 975 975 975 '' 975 975 SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE 3. CAPACITY 446 498 538 528 564 609 [644] NOTES: 1 Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities 2 Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available This is a calculated number only The actual number of portables that will be used will be based on actual student population needs The District may begin to pull portables from the instructional inventory Age and condition of the portables will determine feasibility for continued instructional use 3 Capacity for unhoused students will be accommodated with traveling teachers and no planning time in some classrooms 27 t FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2011 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN King County, the City of Federal Way, and the City of Kent Impact Fee Calculations Single and Multi-Family Residences Each jurisdiction that imposes school impact fees requires that developers pay these fees to help cover a share of the impact of new housing developments on school facilities To determine an equitable fee throughout unincorporated King County, a formula was established This formula can be found in King County Code 2 1 A and was substantially adopted by the City of Federal Way and Kent. The formula requires the District to establish a "Student Generation Factor" which estimates how many students will be added to a school district by each new single or multi-family unit and to gather some standard construction costs, which are unique to that district. - STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR ANALYSIS ' Federal Way Public Schools student generation factor was detetmmed separately for single-family units and multi-family units. The factors used in the 2011 Capital Facilities Plan were derived using actual generation factors from single-family units that were constructed in the last five(5) years - IMPACT FEE CALCULATION Following the calculations for the student generation factor is a copy of the Impact Fee Calculation for single family and multi-family units based on King County Code 2 1 A and the Growth Management Act. ➢ Temporary Facility Cost is the average cost of a portable purchased within the last 12 months Plan Year 2011 Plan Year 2010 Single Family Units $4,014 $3,832 Multi-Family Units $2,172 $2,114 28 � zMwce) § } \ ) j ) CC a2 £ o = S mr In mm = a = m $ « 0 ( C-4 cli \ \ § CM \dLL = = 000eoo = 0 2 @ DmI rZ C%jN - 0 - = It ( $ eLLco = eeoeee = 3 z s @ �- - \ � § } \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ) \ j \ / § 2 2 (n d ) $ 7 @ / ) /§ m = = � CD ID Ncli—T co ) CD CD z _ § , } ce ` z ` ( } \ / j222222 � = % ee $ \ \ ) } k / 2 3 § Z \ ® \ 2 ) § _ @2 b _ ] f ° @ ~ � G @ \ v » ( t § k ° » ° ay - & 2 = q § w ! \ & ( & ; C E ^ z [ ui / t $ \ ) § = = = e = ce00000 CC z2 � C � � \ } ] } \ \ @ \ % E m § a@g7 / $ ■ ec - � j @r 0 - zLU - @ 0 \ \ + 72 \ ) j / \ � � ' e ° ` ® 3 c ] ] gCC try \ aj / £ \ 3 } \ \ \ R /// § $ FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2011 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN IMPACT FEE School Site Acquisition Cost: Student Student Facility Cost/ Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Acreage Acre Capacity SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary 0 3507 0 1650 SO $0 ------ ------ .. .. Middle School 0 1701 00530 $0 $0 High School 0 2361 0 0640 $0 $0 TOTAL $0 $0 School Construction Cost: Student Student %Perm Fac./ Facility Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Total Sq Ft Cost Capacity SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary 9525% S9,100,000J....O.. 200 03507 01650 $15,199 $7,151 Middle School 0 1701 005301 $0 $0 High School 0 21361 0 0640 $0 $0 TOFAL 1 $15,199 $7.151 Temporary Facility Cost: Student Student % Temp Fac Facility Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Total Sq Ft Cost Size SI•R MFR SFR MFR Elementary 0 3507 0 1650 Middle ! 1 98% $183,996 25 0 1701 00530 $25 $8 .. . .... - . High School 0 2361 0 0640 TOTAL $25 $8 State Matching Credit Calculation: Student Student Area Cost Sq Ft State Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Allowance,,Sq Ft Student Match SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary I-M-- . $j8O17 9.0_ ............6....186/� 03507 01650 $3,518 $1,655 Middle School __ $180 17 0 1701 0 0530 $0 $0 High School $180 17 0 2361 00640 $0 $0 Total $3,518 $1,655 Tax Payment Credit Calculation SFR MFR Average Assessed Value (March 2010) $267,668 $84,429 Capital Bond Interest Rate(March 2010) _ 4 33% 4 33% Net Present Value of Average Dwelling $2,135,797 $673,692 Years Amortized 10 10 Property Tax Levy Rate $1 72 $1 72 Present Value of Revenue Stream $3,678 $1 160 Single Family Multi-Family Residences Residences Mitigation Fee Summary Site Acquisition Cost $ - $ - Permanent Facility Cost $ 15,199 $ 7,151 Temporary Facility Cost $ 25 $ 8 State Match Credit $ (3,518) $ (1,655) Tax Payment Credit $ (3,678) $ (1,160) Sub-Total $ 8,028 $ 4,343 50%Local Share $ 4,014 $ 2,172 illimpact Fee $ 4,014 $ 2,172 30 ' tFEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2011 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 4 SUMMARY OF CHANGES FROM THE 2010 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN The 2011 Capital Facilities Plan is an updated document,based on the 2010 Capital Facilities Plan The changes between the 2010 Plan and the 2011 Plan are listed below. SECTION I - THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SIX-YEAR FINANCE PLAN The Six Year Finance Plan has been rolled forward to reflect 201112017 SECTION Ill - SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION CAPACITY Elementary capacity includes space for All Day Kindergarten programs at every elementary school Changes to the Building Program Capacities calculation are found on page 17. PORTABLES The list of portables reflects the movement of portables between facilities or new portables purchased. Portable Locations can be found on page 19. STUDENT FORECAST The Student Forecast now covers 2011 through 2017 Enrollment history and projections are found on page 22. CAPACITY SUMMARY The changes in the Capacity Summary are a reflection of the changes in the capacities and student forecast New schools and increased capacity at current buildings are shown as increases to capacity. Capacity Summaries are found on pages 24-27. IMPACT FEE CALCULATION - KING COUNTY CODE 21A The Impact Fee Calculations have changed due to changes in several factors. The adjustment made in the Impact Fee Calculation, causing a change in the Impact Fee between the 2010 Capital Facilities Plan and the 2011 Capital Facilities Plan can be found on page 32 and 33 I 31 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2011 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN IMPACT FEE CALCULATION CHANGES FROM 2010 TO 2011 STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS Student Generation factors are based on rates for new developments constructed over a period of not more than five years prior to the date of the fee calculation The changes in student Generation factors between the 2010 Capital Facilities Plan and the 2011 Capital Facilities Plan are due to developments that were deleted or added based upon the age of the developments and the year placed in the survey The Student Generation worksheet is found on page 29. SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION COSTS The anticipated cost for replacing Lakeland, Panther Lake, Sunnycrest and Valhalla as $70,000,000 The replacement will add 50 new seats to the school capacity at each building The total capacity at these four elementary schools is currently 1505 Adding 200 additional seats will increase the capacity by 13% Total Cost .13 X $70,000,000 = $9,100,000 The District will use the above formula created as a base from the 2008 Capital Facilities Plan for the 2011 Capital Facilities Plan. The capacity of the four elementary schools may vary from year to year as programs are added or changed and construction cost may increase over time. For instance, for each new all day Kindergarten program, the building capacity will effectively be reduced by 20 headcount and the Board authorized an increase in construction cost of$lm for Valhalla These changes would increase the construction cost The District is using the base formula established in the 2008 plan in the Impact Fee calculation. i t 32 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2011 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN IMPACT FEE CALCULATION CHANGES FROM 2010 TO 2011 IMPACT FEE Item From/To Comment Percent of Permanent Facilities 95.62% to 95.71% Report #3 OSPI Percent Temporary Facilities 4.38% to 4.29% Updated portable inventory Average Cost of Portable $193,607 to $183,996 Updated average of portables Classroom purchased and placed in 2009 Change effective July 1, 2010 Area Cost Allowance $168.79 to $180.17 State Match 61.09% to 61.86% Change effective July 2009 Average Assessed Value SFR— Per Puget Sound Educational $326,409 to $267,668 Service District (ESD t21) MFR— $86,497 to $84,429 Capital Bond Interest Rate 4.96% to 4.33% Market Rate Property Tax Levy Rate $1.48 to $1.72 King County Treasury Division Single Family Student Yield Updated Housing Inventory Elementary .3317 to .3507 I Middle School 1653 to .1701 High School 2224 to .2361 Multi-Family Student Yield Updated Housing Inventory Elementary .1520 to .165 Middle School 0520 to .053 ' High School .0590 to .064 33 DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Issued with a 14 Day comment and appeals period Description of Proposal: This threshold determination analyzes the environmental impacts associated with the following actions, which are so closely related to each other that they are in effect a single action 1. The adoption of the Federal Way Public Schools' 2011 Six Year Capital Facilities Plan by the Federal Way Public Schools for the purposes of planning for the facilities needs of the District. 2. The amendment of the King County Comprehensive Plan by King County to include the Federal Way Public Schools' 2011 Capital Facilities Plan as part of the Capital Facilities Plan Element of the King County Comprehensive Plan 3. The amendment of the Comprehensive Plans of the City of Federal Way, City of Kent and the City of Auburn to include the Federal Way Public Schools' 2011 Capital Facilities Plan as part of the Capital Facilities Plan Element of the City of Federal Way's, City of Kent's and the City of Auburn's Comprehensive Plan. This proposal may also involve the amendment of the Comprehensive Plans of the City of Des Moines to incorporate the Federal Way Public Schools' 2011 Capital Facilities Plan into the Capital Facilities Element of the City of Des Moines' Comprehensive Plan. Proponent: Federal Way Public Schools Location of the Proposal. The Federal Way Public Schools District includes an area of approximately 35 square miles. Areas of the cities of Federal Way, Kent, Des Moines and Auburn fall within the District's boundaries, as do parts of unincorporated King County i Lead Agency: Federal Way Public Schools is the lead agency pursuant to WAC 197-11-926. The lead agency for this proposal has determined that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse environmental impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C 030(2)(c). This decision was made after a review of the completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public upon request This Determination ofNonsignificance (DNS) is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date of issue Comments must be submitted by 5 00 p m., April 21, 2010. The responsible official will reconsider the DNS based on timely comments and may retain, modify, or, if significant adverse impacts are likely, withdraw the DNS. If the DNS is retained, it will be final after the expiration of the comment deadline. Responsible Official: Ms. Tanya Nascimenot Enrollment and Demographics Federal Way Public Schools Telephone: (253) 945-2071 Address: 31405 18th Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 You may appeal this determination in writing by 5.00 p m., April 21, 2010 to Tanya Nascimento, Federal Way Public Schools, 31405 18th Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003. Date of Issue: April 7, 2010 E Date Published: April 7, 2010 I i l 2 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST II WAC 197-11-960 Environmental Checklist. Purpose of Checklist- The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your I proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. 1 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Use of checklist for nonproject proposals- Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply" In addition, complete the Supplemental Sheet for nonproject actions (part D) For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. t I l 1 2 � ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST I, A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: The adoption of a Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan by the Federal Way School District No. 210 for the purposes of planning for the District's facilities needs. The King County, City of Federal Way, ' City of Kent and the City of Auburn's Comprehensive Plan will be amended to include the District's 2011 Capital Facilities Plan in the Capital Facilities Plan Element This project may also involve the amendment of the Comprehensive Plans of the city of Des Moines to incorporate the District's 2011 Capital Facilities Plan. 2. Name of applicant: Federal Way School District No. 210. 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Federal Way School District No 210 31405 l8th Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 (253) 945-2000 Contact Person: Ms. Tanya Nascimento Enrollment and Demographics Telephone- (253) 945-2071 4. Date checklist prepared. April 7, 2010 5. Agency requesting checklist: Federal Way School District No. 210 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): The Federal Way School District's 2011 Capital Facilities Plan is scheduled to be adopted by the District in May 2010. The Capital Facilities Plan will be forwarded to King County, the City of Federal Way, City of Kent and the City of Auburn for inclusion in each jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan It will also be forwarded to the city of Des Moines for possible inclusion in this jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plans The District will continue to update the Capital Facilities Plan annually. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject to project-specific environmental review 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal9 If yes, explain. 3 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST The Capital Facilities Plan sets forth the capital improvement projects that the District is currently implementing These include construction of four elementary schools, Lakeland, Panther Lake, Sunnycrest and Valhalla. This plan also includes construction of Lakota Middle School. Additionally the plan covers the purchase and siting of temporary facilities at various locations. Non-instructional projects included in the plan will consolidate support services operations at a single location. This will include the construction of new facilities to house the Transportation, Maintenance and Nutrition Services departments. Current plans are for all the projects to be complete by 2013 8 List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will undergo additional environmental review, when appropriate, as they are developed. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. Permits will be applied for with the appropriate jurisdiction for minor projects during the 2011 calendar year. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. The District anticipates that King County, the City of Federal Way, the City of Kent and the city of Auburn will adopt this Capital Facilities Plan into their Comprehensive Plan The city of Des Moines may also adopt this Capital Facilities Plan into the Capital Facilities Elements of their Comprehensive Plans (when issued) 11. Give a brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description) This is a non-project action. This proposal involves the adoption of the Federal Way School District's 2011 Capital Facilities Plan for the purpose of planning the District's facilities needs. The District's Capital Facilities Plan will be incorporated into King County's, the City Federal Way's, the City of Kent's and the City of Auburn's Comprehensive Plans. It may also be incorporated into the Comprehensive Plans of the city of Des Moines The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject to project-specific environmental review A copy of the Capital Facilities Plan may be viewed at the District's offices 4 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 12 Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address if any, and section, township, 1 and range, if known. if a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the srte(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map. and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The Capital Facilities Plan will affect the Federal Way School District. The District includes an area of approximately 35 square miles The City of Federal Way, parts of the cities of Kent, Des Moines and Auburn, parts of unincorporated King County, fall within the District's boundaries. A detailed map of the District's boundaries can be viewed at the District's offices. 5 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one)- Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other The Federal Way School District is comprised of a variety of topographic land forms and gradients Specific topographic characteristics of the sites at which the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan are located have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Specific slope characteristics at the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan I have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Specific soil types found at the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity9 If so, describe Unstable soils may exist within the Federal Way School District. Specific soil limitations on individual project sites have been or will be identified at the time of project-level environmental review when appropriate. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject, when appropriate, to project-specific environmental review and local approval at the time of proposal Proposed grading projects, as well as the purpose, type, quantity, and source of any fill materials to be used have been or will be identified at that time f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. It is possible that erosion could occur as a result of the construction projects currently proposed in the Capital Facilities Plan The erosion impacts of the individual projects have been or will be evaluated on a site-specific basis at the time of project-specific environmental review when appropriate. Individual projects have been or will be subject to local approval processes. 6 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings?) The proposed renovation projects will require the construction of impervious surfaces. The extent of any impervious cover constructed will vary with each capital facilities project included in the Capital Facilities Plan This issue has been or will be addressed during project- specific environmental review when appropriate. 1 h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: I The erosion potential of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan and appropriate control measures have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. Relevant erosion reduction and control requirements will be met 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed` If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Various emissions, many construction-related, may result from the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan. The air-quality impacts of each project have been or will be evaluated during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposa19 If so, generally describe. Any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any The individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject to project-specific environmental review when appropriate and relevant local approval processes. The District will be required to comply with all applicable air regulations and air permit requirements Proposed measures specific to the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review ' when appropriate Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. i7 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 3. Water a Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)9 If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. There is a network of surface water bodies within the Federal Way School District. The surface water bodies that are in the immediate vicinity of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. When necessary, the surface water regimes and flow patterns have been or will be researched and incorporated into the designs of the individual projects. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters9 If yes, please describe and attach available plans The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may require work near the surface waters located within the Federal Way School District Applicable local approval requirements have been or will be satisfied 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Information with respect to the placement or removal of fill and dredge material as a component of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be provided during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. Applicable local regulations have been or will be satisfied. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions9 Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Any surface water withdrawals or diversions required in connection with the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project- specific environmental review when appropriate. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplam? If so, note location on the site plan i Each project included in the Capital Facilities Plan, if located in a floodplam area, will be required to meet applicable local regulations for flood areas 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge 8 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Specific information regarding the discharge of waste materials that may be required as a result of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be provided during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. b. Ground• 1) Will groundwater be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to groundwater Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may impact groundwater resources The impact of the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan on groundwater resources has been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. Each project is or will be subject to applicable local regulations. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example Domestic sewage, industrial, containing the following chemicals .; agricultural, etc). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. The discharges of waste material that may take place in connection with the projects included in the Plan have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review. c. Water Runoff(including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known) Where will this water flow9 Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may have storm water runoff consequences. Specific information regarding the storm water impacts of each project has been or will be provided during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. Each project is or will be subject to applicable local storm water regulations. t 9 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may result in the discharge of waste materials into ground or surface waters The specific impacts of each project on ground and surface waters have been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. Each project is or will be subject to all applicable regulations regarding the discharge of waste materials into ground and surface waters. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Specific measures to reduce or control runoff impacts associated with the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. 4. Plants. a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs grass pasture crop or gram wet soil plants- cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation A variety of vegetative zones are located within the Federal Way School District. Inventories of the vegetation located on the sites of the projects proposed in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be developed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Some of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may require the removal or alteration of vegetation The specific impacts on vegetation of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review when appropriate c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. The specific impacts to these species from the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be determined during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. 10 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plans, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any. Measures to preserve or enhance vegetation at the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review �i when appropriate. Each project is or will be subject to applicable local landscaping requirements. 5. Animals: a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk,heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals. deer, bear, elk, beaver, other. fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: An inventory of species that have been observed on or near the sites of the projects proposed in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be developed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Inventories of threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be developed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain The impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan on migration routes have _ been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any- Appropriate measures to preserve or enhance wildlife have been or will be determined during protect-specific environmental review when appropriate. 11 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 6. Energy and Natural Resources: a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. The State Board of Education requires the completion of a life cycle cost analysis of all heating, lighting, and insulation systems before it will permit specific school projects to proceed. The energy needs of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be determined at the time of specific engineering and site design planning when appropriate. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe: The impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan on the solar potential of adjacent projects have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any- Energy conservation measures proposed in connection with the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be considered during project-specific environmental review when appropriate 7. Environmental Health• a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any- The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will comply with all current codes, standards, rules, and regulations Individual projects have been or will be subject to project-specific environmental review and Local approval at the time they are developed when appropriate. 12 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST b. Noise: 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example- traffic, equipment, operation, other)? A variety of noises from traffic, construction, residential, commercial and industrial areas exists within the Federal Way School District. The specific noise sources that may affect the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. a 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site The District does not anticipate that the projects will create long-term increases in traffic- related or operations-related noise levels. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: The projected noise impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be evaluated and mitigated during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. Each project is or will be subject to applicable local regulations 8. Land and Shoreline Use: a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? There are a variety of land uses within the Federal Way School Distnct, including residential, commercial, industrial, institutional, utility, open space, recreational, etc. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. The project sites covered under the Capital Facilities Plan have not been used recently for agriculture. c. Describe any structures on the site. The structures located on the proposed sites for the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified and described during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. 13 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what9 The remodeling and renovation projects will require the demolishment of school structures. The strictures that will be demolished as a result of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review when appropriate e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? The sites that are covered under the Capital Facilities Plan have a variety of zoning classifications under the applicable zoning codes Site-specific zoning information has been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Inventories of the comprehensive plan designations for the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be completed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Shoreline master program designations of the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Any environmentally sensitive areas located on the sites of the projects included in the Plan have been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? The Federal Way School District currently serves approximately 22,200 students The student population is expected to increase to 23,000 by the year 20t6 This projection has been adjusted to reflect the current economic conditions The District employs approximately 3,200 people. j Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Any displacement of people caused by the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be evaluated during project-specific environmental review when appropriate However, it is not anticipated that the Capital Facilities Plan, or any of the projects contained therein, will displace any people. 14 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be subject to project-specific environmental review and local approval when appropriate. Proposed mitigating measures will be proposed at that time, if necessary. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans,if any. The compatibility of the specific projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan with existing uses and plans has been or will be assessed as part of the comprehensive planning process and during project-specific environmental review when appropriate 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing No housing units would be provided in connection with the completion of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be elimmated9 Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. It is not anticipated that the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will eliminate any housing units. The impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan on existing housing have been or will be evaluated during project-specific environmental review when appropriate c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any- Measures to reduce or control any housing impacts caused by the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate 10. Aesthetics: a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed9 The aesthetic impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. 15 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? The aesthetic impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be determined during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any- Appropriate measures to reduce or control the aesthetic impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be determined on a project-specific basis when appropriate 11. Light and Glare: a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce9 What time of day would it mainly occur? The light or glare impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views' The light or glare impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Off-site sources of light or glare that may affect the projects included in the Capital Facilities , Plan have been or will be evaluated during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Proposed measures to mitigate light and glare impacts have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. 12. Recreation: a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? There are a variety of formal and informal recreational facilities within the Federal Way School District. 16 , ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses' If so, describe. The recreational impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan, including proposed renovated school and support facilities, may enhance recreational opportunities and uses. I c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any Adverse recreational effects of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject to mitigation during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. A school site usually provides recreational facilities to the community in the form of play fields and gymnasiums. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation: a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? if so, generally describe. There are no known places or objects listed on, or proposed for such registers on the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan. The existence of historic and cultural resources on or next to the sites has been or will be addressed in more detail during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. An inventory of historical sites at or near the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be developed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate c Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any- Appropriate measures have been or will be proposed on a project-specific basis when appropriate. 14. Transportation: a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The impact on public streets and highways of the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. 17 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop9 The relationship between the specific projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan and public transit has been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. c How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project ehmmate? An inventory of parking spaces located at the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan and the impacts of specific projects on parking availability has been or will be conducted during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). The need for new streets or roads, or improvements to existing streets and roads has been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe Use of water, rail, or air transportation has been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. f How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. The traffic impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: The mitigation of traffic impacts associated with the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. 15. Public Services: a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example- fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)`' If so, generally describe. The District does not anticipate that the projects identified in the Capital Facilities Plan will �) substantially increase the need for other public services. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. , 18 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Remodeled/renovated school or facilities will be built with automatic security systems, fire alarms, smoke alarms, heat sensors, and sprinkler systems. 16. Utilities: a. Circle utilities currently available at the site. electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. Electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, and sanitary sewer utilities are available at the sites of the projects proposed in the Capital Facilities Plan The types of utilities available at specific project saes have been or will be addressed in more detail during project- specific environmental review when appropriate. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Utility revisions and construction needs have been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: April 7, 2010 19 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise` To the extent the Capital Facilities Plan makes it more likely that school facilities will be constructed and/or renovated and remodeled, some of these environmental impacts will be more likely. Additional impermeable surfaces, such as roofs, parking lots, sidewalks, access roads, and playgrounds could increase storm water runoff, which could enter surface or ground waters. Heating systems, emergency generators, and other school equipment that is installed pursuant to the Capital Facilities Plan could result in air emissions. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan should not require the production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances, with the possible exception of the storage of diesel fuel or gasoline for emergency generating equipment. The District does not anticipate a significant increase in the production of noise from its facilities, although the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will increase the District's student capacities Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Proposed measures to mitigate any such increases described above have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate Storm water detention and runoff will meet applicable County and/or City requirements and may be subject to National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ("NPDES") permitting requirements. Discharges to air will meet applicable air pollution control requirements. Fuel oil will be stored in accordance with local and state requirements. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? The Capital Facilities Plan itself will have no impact on these elements of the environment. These impacts have been or will be addressed in more detail during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. The projects included in the Plan are not likely to generate severe impacts on fish or marine life. 20 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: Specific measures to protect and conserve plants, animals, and fish cannot be identified at this time. Specific mitigation proposals have been or will be identified, however, during project- specific environmental review when appropriate. 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? The construction of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will require the consumption of energy. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be constructed in accordance with applicable energy efficiency standards. 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection, such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplams, or prime farmlands? The Capital Facilities Plan and individual projects contained therein should have no impact on these resources. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are. Appropriate measures have been or will be proposed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate Updates of this Plan will be coordinated with King County and the cities of Federal Way, Kent, Des Moines, and Auburn as part of the Growth Management Act process, one of the purposes of which is to protect environmentally sensitive areas To the extent the District's facilities planning process is part of the overall growth management planning process, these resources are more likely to be protected 5 How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? The Capital Facilities Plan will not have any impact on land or shoreline use that is incompatible with existing comprehensive plans, land use codes, or shoreline management plans The District does not anticipate that the Capital Facilities Plan or the projects contained therein will directly affect land and shoreline uses in the area served by the District Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: No measures to avoid or reduce land use impacts resulting from the Capital Facilities Plan or the projects contained therein are proposed at this time. ' 21 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities" The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may create temporary increases in the District's need for public services and utilities. Upon the completion of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan, however, the District does not anticipate that its need for public services and utilities will increase substantially beyond existing levels. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are- No measures to reduce or respond to such demands are proposed at this time. 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. The Capital Facilities Plan will not conflict with any laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. 22 o � � o crp a) 'a ows_ p @ ° @ 0000 b 2a N M CL 3 ° o �° c `O o c too c Q Q o p - Co > L a? E 0) a W E o. CES o w` 7 _ 1 O. C Ny coy ° o o c ( mm 2 ° y U c' « p-0 N a) '70 = 7 a) (D m M _ a o Q) CD o LD c m v Z y w @ @ n W EC- C a`) O w C p"O C - ° U v- a) 7 @ Z L y O @ y m 01 C a) C O fn c a) V- @ of y > a) O U y 7 y p 7 C y C O LP p C ;Q U a U Q..0 t 'O C N L p co M L @ L a E CD _ o a7 7 @ p � rn E m p 7 m o Q E > > C c Q y c C @ @ > ° o �Lm (D v @ C y m �' w ( @ m v E p 0 ` 'O 01 p a) X a) @ 7 U a) C @ C N o > a C a) C- Q y 3 c a) E t y O c E m o x ° c v _T CL O O @ ° @ Q Q E O N a) O m y0 @ U L L p N U �C@p E U @ -0@@ C L .0 7 C.p U X U c O Q C @ @ y> j c @ m p c a) o o m w CL M E E a a - nm �+ ° a > y w o°a 3 E a) 'o o >, c @ >m Q 7 �... O L_ @ N U > ° m �_ O C C ° a) C 7 7 C �' N a 0 @ >,n p y Q ° >' O L @ O@ @ 'C a) 'C L _ c - @ 0) T ° 3ru @@ U @ @ @ C p _ C 0.9 w O U p = v y 2 o c o m E rnm Q aa) O y mCC -p 0 a) O_ 0 M a) c @ O a) 'C O a) 7 _m '�' m _� O 'L" tq O C N C C C O 7 @ 7 CL ca a) Q _ N -C O@ a)CL CD co toQ. — @ y U y CD w a) t O a) E (0 C 7 - L m U c cmN C 'C U CLC N •C U C y c y a)"O .O @ a) O O @ N a) - O .> p @ N .@. a -D cism y Q 0. - U_ E O p, C U L.. N O'U --. m -C Q m .N Z 7 y of m CL 7 7 m@ o p U vi y O O a C 7 a O a y @ L p W O) C Q _ C m C o y_ Q fl. a) 0 M a) E y d o o °) c'N p 3 E m C cc O— 'O T Q) O C O m m r.. 7 @ y y p O O m > y — .Y O@ N E W N N a) a1 U C O n c m p c m U > > vi p v > m N p 0 a) p ,., ='O O •p to 3 4-. 'C O) 'O U 2 7 C CO U CD p a) C ti- p p O O y C CL N Q m ..7, m C O p U L y O U Q p C a1 +i m'C N C p 7 () > C @ @ 0)M CL m p CL @ ac p �Q Ym. rn m7 ° c oo m '0 C y C @ @ ooy o a n E > - a) a) m Q o c°) wm m v a) O 0 C w j ° a) c Q a3 ` — 0 "O °- y N @ W @ T 7 �. oL m m mw E E N v c - c c°) Yt- 0) ac n E oc a) c - a) - cm o� p o mQ c v a) v M a n c rn m 'c p m 'a C @ y 0 'a 'O 6 O Q a) — @ m O C �- y C O C C @ 0 p C C U C75 7 <( a) > C U 0 Z T a) .�`O y m N N.2 > 'O W O @ O)pE p (D `mN c°)m `1) a) � w :2 � � C °o m° a� O (D ° a�i p m w �� w ° @ a° m o o a) o o p 7 7 p a) y @ 7 - C U C @ C °V -° 7 'O ° m @ C y 'O U U m O C O 'O > O V m�� � c mo Q���@ > E o c7 vm o ° � � @ w o p rom w � U om � ,� n- m pp .O a. mm yv_, Z 0 to U@ p y C y = y Q 7 n N Q C ° C _ C y a3 C Q CL N W -O L" °) O)•ap °- to ° U O°0 p N `°) 'u E fl. o a o m o y C @ 0� ° C C Q p c Co E cl @ Q w o m rn a> p p rn ° m@ > @ y o Q> c C O O r a� w E y Q r y p ° O O C) O N C C= cc0 h VC-1 a) O C m a) Z' @ C"O N y > O V) r § a) p 1] a 7 >. O cl N N ° OQ E O."O C C 7 y co UCo 0 0 I- 2 W of w a. a. Z r- O@ W O o a. p = t\d C O L °. .{.� .Ni C y L(9 C C (D @ .n^i U O) N O ��..W I a) v u m p U E @ 7 � ` -E � E m c o O L m m o '° � c 3 m m O C C > > U m 0 C_ O N a @ C O m 00 mN DEca � a) ° mom °7Xaa)) -' v "� � m Eaa c o E m 7 ° a° - w• c c m a s mo °)vcmic°i � `amays o@dm m FL co �N � co p U a) a) C'jn m E C -R N N 7 C Ql y m Q) C Co m 7 >° �� @ �-ami m m E o aa))o Co-0o .m. a U N m C N N m m N N U 0 N Co N E E O NL U C 7 N x a) a N () N a) ` c m _ E a) ? cyn ma) o-E� ,a? > �� U��c � _E �� 0o o m .L-. O N a) 7 .a) C N C O- N W N U "m0 T m ` U G p V) m a) m N a) ° m E > N C L E N U O C'u >y,O t O N = W a) _ C C ,� C O C 3 U o °) caa 0 = = > � p c o a)=- E o y n� . m w c N m m p O` C m L V 'O U C N U m °L ra� @ C Fi O a) O) L a) N m aC •�-- a O` Cc m C m n m E a) m °'� a 7 N m CLa. : E ca (D nac O o-) a)L L 0 U 0 w rn� E m 6 ` p n a) O O n 0 Cn mo U a O7 N N N a) C m a) °L p O E co 3 C,Oo U a) a) m O C C C co 7 N n Q)}- ,tea) O. m0� 'Om > CN � C0 cm CO L ° TE"O — 7 9w mvi m > C E V U C U C 7 C C a)'O N a) N U ? ` m _m ma) =na> 9 NEC0 �c ° m� m a) a) Q1c > c O - O V m .n w a) � a) m .-, M E N U N C C C m N N .D N@ 0) m m C 7 m.D C C X.U 7 C o •C p m e E y C -D N o ` C O U N^ 1 Co a y0 °' � � °' v� a) macm a o cE y � o U OU p y E 7'Dcm c 0 C N = V o n0 n 0) p CU N N L > >'a .L.+ n a) C m v a) N >� j y p m Co "O C U C C O "OO M -o a) C m m N U (6 (E V- N N ca 3 7 U E a= N N m .O �O a) �..-O C m a) N 7ru N a) C G '-� y 7 m 0 L C'D ca"T' n m a) 7 T N ` m Co L ocm � 'c� �� -0 Q) c0N � m x v a) to 00 ( Erm 0 o m o a) U -0� o c CUp o �� E �c ayi �c a) E 2 w m E � n r'a C m n L U p .E ' E O7 0 y Co�- a) O m ca O` m U m N = m M m a c C (- 'O C O] .O 0' 7 a) C a) C O cm w O >„� C ` L U O L 7 7 7 L O) a) O-.s _ ° .O-O E >> a) ca � m m C w U C L O U O_,5.0 8 O) O 0 C O m- U >.m ` b >t C o a) N m Q O O _ O y C C C U N N 0 O N o n O y Q) m y m M a) m �.. a m `m C (6 N O)7 C m Q1 C m C U C o Z N 7 mm-C a) mccm37 oc m ac� a) m ° a) cE 2:" c N @ ru C:fL- 3 w C O O C a 7 ca Ol U O'O C Y c m N@ N a) co U al 2 7 o a) m m o a m 7 m nc rn(0 m _E a �D O E E c c a) L o)� 7 m y ai C m N c°)o N Ea w 7 0 ° m m L CL O.C 'O— O N U N C E U m O.0 N C o N 'D C C a)M 7 m m mmn7 � n Omo X °) a cm xia) a ° Up mNct v N m o c �c M= N o °� �QmN o w Q) amva N c p c rn�-° �� n o °gym - c m ccaa c o Z � m ca ° o O a1 C m L •.- moo m Z'L m a) 2,' vi U N O Q) C U a) 0 U) m L L 7 l� =�a m S ro o o � m N o a) a ° °' mEa o m c N y o +' U n m "p y ° y a)C m N ,� C_ w- c CL U 'o @ 01° C N b oEn o � n°? aaim ocmi � op > � com o 5 � m maciayi0) E o vcoia � Nm �In m� � cEcv o ��oa�i ° c ° a 2E� c m w a) m E � ac) E ° off " �3 ' am) c -0 o a) �2 Ea`).n` m 3 •7 w a) aJ O N O.ci0 O N C Q) C Q U y C .p y > E >y 7 m E C M aa)) °= v °) -pa`)� a r7m �� mmm v Em ` pMT 7 a a) +0 o� N o C > m m ° m-p o � wL �w o o m c7ia aO tO� E ECD NON OCN mew c ? cmm �� OC"m� t�6 UL m � �al N ° C`• O CL n O ° ` m >L 7 a y O m C m m U j ..y.'O N m C (6 d m `p_V N y m -`�- C O 'O "- 2i w C m C a) 0.O C C.D U m ` 'o c� a) N O ? N a) a)N L yU O m L C C N y Q) a) — O .. O m m _ c0 E E ci m -Q c Sma) mm oa)-0 wm yaa)) ccu Eyc � o °) o V y O 7 C U CA co C n C N N .o > C 0) U a) _. m a) cm C m U N a)'C L O C m� L-. E E N C C C U d O N C `- �` ,- a C cn E m 7 n 7 N m a) m E C m m U 'm 0 a) ° C �. a) IQ C m O) O v- O) @ a) III m ov ° m c � 0a) 0 cQ) r mom° m c7 cn 0)E � °� � a o b P cE N co a)�� a mw - n yc N U7 � m� m o 3 m V- 1 U 0 a a) vi U 7 N C y O 0 C m cab N C'O N E @ E °, t.n�O m ` >' a) m )Vi ° pd n E m -a c m m uy mw U E- p m cc UL t- amL rn� N n c c m N p 0' 0 v 7 m m ° � c �T � E � m m m >_ E U C n 0—�mj a) a) y� N ° 7 m wa C a) U p N N@ >p C C L OU c nN E c @ m E-o m e = m a E c > rn�� aG) a > > 0 0 3 m > m a) O)m w« O m 0 — a) 7 C(1 m a) 0 cn U U O y on �o-, r °) cc -D a) a) a) c � m � a a) c ma coo ° ym rna) � m CU7 v@i � ompm CD a) Occ � umi - aEi� E � Y a) 0) Nw rn > a r- aa)) C-m E at a � y yp o a nm ; m m w L N £ m N9 m 7 0 .O N (0 7 "O 7 Mro Ea °c mo °03 Lc Om c@i 3NL = E 7c EE- ' n oc aa)L o 0�• ? 7 ° ¢ 0a) N Qmo - Q mN QE Ko C7 � m m � N - a � � � m ^7 -oc � c Cm-oN °? � N3 „o m wm = ° '0 U Q G; �c� cam w �o c7i o o vo o E m v.3 m N m v a°i v° ° o a) O m m ° m f- oL nS rn m c n- E °a�n �) `o. U -0 :3 m q 0 � � w cm E a y Lm c (0i3 E EN N O W N a) ^ O N a N — m L O m C L L T 7 Q) 1 !]4 a N O O a C m O L� U a d L y y . N O.0 00 Qi 7 m a7 C n r0—• !a)n o UU) C N L N �.' 3 7 m L 7 O L O N - 2 7 C a1 0-0 O) a, E o ° ° � 0 3 2 m �� x o c a) C.T) M U w m ` CU m �' aa)) >.o m 'wo E° n c o j m I- c� .c m m m7 a) � a) (D0mmr3 -a 0 >, a) a m L 3 U) - O ° N m-. D n O O N 3 > m 7 m C v � 3 y m ac mr `maoE `off ? amE 1 1 > N N L O a) O 'C 0 N Q m ms m m � C C (D ' O p m m .. m p m C to fA p.0 O.O n 7 T C O O)L a n m U) a`) rn� ` o a n» L) m a E o S m m �.N f6 a C C m m C p U (D C a) O O a) N 0 U xE Edo N-0a) �my m -0 a) N ° 7 m m E (D a) m o 5 y, a) c now o w N -a g o � ° gym w0 , =Ua 0 (D o o Np a) m wo- m°) E 7 n7 °) (-) m °) ° - x ° wm cm- a >� > pf6 nLom� > ti ya E m o � 'oma) c °- � w moa)om � c N o. i d +=. a) 7 .0 n N n a. N m C N N n_- y a0 O N 7 m •L-' O m- D)0 3 0•- C W E 5 - L 0 > yr a 0 0 E E L m a y o c cu C m a L o Cl) L In C ..L.. C m rn N N N o.O , m U E m C N.N w U N O' C L E L al m Om m m U j aviwNmm pNC Coa) ` L m U m- a) C= w Q) . 0 C O X 7 N 2 n L a U In --.. O yL•, c U) m U m N 3 7 a) a) m O a) m 7 C p N N a) U V pi V N L o O O V N fU p° c•00 .0 w L m a o (`U axiom o o a) 3o m o omoaNi > o �o my0U a c a an ow o 3 oa>io C-OUmp) `o. 22o�oc i c a) O N (a �L' E N -0 a) C C a a N a) aa))C m a)_ m o N N C. @ w m cm - E x •(n omm a � co ) - aw0CE0 d m c CL ° �' °) ° a) m E 0 am) aa)) o � pcC a) C (D0 Oyp C ° C > C15 O N N 0 O' m a) D a) � U .. N C 7 N..L..O C�LO,~ a c y0 LN--. d a mo c mcm E m a) m am y-0� EoN CO o o I 7 c w e O w 3 L3 o m o o m _o m o a)) E oL �) a) ca c w m in O N _c 7 U m O a) N O rn C .O T m N E C 7 r- U 3 (nn-O m m co p .L. C d) a1 r V 01 C U) N i a) 7 =' O 7 N I'" O.-.O L.° .L... mUS .>1 a C 7 O C N E O C N E 7 d C O p m m a C a) ° m N m Co m O 7 3 m O .to X n .O a) 7 U) U C Ul n 0 C N m N a) a 0 fU 3 C m �- p o `m m da) ma°) N - c � co 7ma) 3ma `tea Nmm a)Eca Q oo ` ioo oE ' ( cE m m a) 00 on 0 - � (D nr . c c t 3 a) W 7-1-0 N N C m N O O O E Q) () In C a) O d >0 a) o C C 0 O - m U v> Ea t m 7T Q., p `m m0ca— CU °o - 0 N o )n C E �a oo N `00 aio -C " m - aa) mop � � In CC O C 7 O 17n C L Co > mm m N U > > E O a 0 m m N N SZ a) O- N 2 0) -0 O co m " ` N O` m N 7 In N '0-0 a a1 C a N E U N X .O fa Z'N Cl)cn to m C 7 O C m a) U > d m Co p• N m N °)U D N ICU co � a1 0 O�N C 1) O x N Co O (a O �" �- O 7 w to c c °a m CA O C LL.., C C 7 m L N 0. M a o n o m o 0 rn° `o o f6 w'c m o U °) cia.0 Q 3 7n ° o U a) 7 (D . X 0 Ca w � in Um2C13 L._ ` � m O C6 O O Y E a (6 C C a) �. N C - N U) > O 7 N O co 0.° O m U C C m m C C«'n « O o 4mi N C O-� a) 0) a. .D °)a Cl) ° EE dw cm oo mocm coa) o � � ?� ca _c ro c c ru _ _ C 01 2�.- 7 w C C N Co p m N E O U LO am) m p N a) U N N >, 7 U Vm. O O a) U Q• E > U U X m U a) W Z: ur w N 0 m O_p m m x C U o CC O > m m `p C a)a ) E N� O C N y O " V m m 0 L"- a) - C c c N � m w N o L m c° om r-0 o o o o a) E E > j o @ c to -0 7 (0 m C `T a) U O O C E Q) a p a N Q O a) C O a) m Co y 0 C N (n r7' a) a a) a) ui m fq C C C O Z > C p 0 U m E C O C C vi °- O m .a > rL... E ry+ .fl a) N a) C m N O C EM c y 0 p N« 7 L m a) U 3 m F Q) NCL E y U n .� > O E 'O 7 O m O N E O O Q) N m N M C .0, m N E -0.O a p a L li O m m C O L N r >.L... > O) O 6 a - >,m U 7 a 7 V y U y 7 n y T On ti m m U C 3 N U -o 'm0 a) .D m > C C L > m X�'fl a) m W `1 cn C m L W 7 c O w a) m L m rn a) EL a) o m E m o c- p 3 o m c m cm � Q) mo a U) a � a) m- Ecm0- m -_T. U o n cu o om o 'a m� 0 m y0c oc � 0Na) aCD cu°ia 0 m � n m � > � a o0 oa omam c c -0 ° a) >,mT E c 7 c n a c ° 3 -0 - °a m L m -0 S o C c of cm a(Dci 07m0 o0ooEL m? XEncL0 w o a) c m nc Em Ec E m ;n n7 mcm ° mv - mow@o ° a) w a! w ° m a) o f 10 n p) o. ° c c n y°- Co a m m m m �_ rn c � � > ° E° oN of 00a cmE � � ` -0 (D no o w � m m m m 7 c m o m ; am v > EN 0 a>) a mom ° =) N � a)� �� oa� °' � 7 � m � m aa) E .- a - a o c- � o` c °) caw 0 m c 7 m � m ° E ? 0C) co. ca mc ° C Lm cm `mmo ° ozaci Em c cad CL n � a) v � c Q � Qv Q ° Joao F a) oomn Qmcc > EI`U tL O O � aka ?� ma Ua>i v(D = cm �o I- � m'00, o � °c Q mo v O 6 a 0 0'0 " a' (m) a ` a 3 > (D-a 7 r- 7 c c 0 M L =a m m :3 o c c ur.O a) ca m O @ U @ � CD L) 3 m m v E N`m _ cc � m me n ° > N ° a L �4c-- m «? 00 o a) a x o °' aa)i a) Z N `m a) N N m N O m`m m E E m 8 7 m � >1-r- m o N '� C N C O N ° O C O 7 U X 5 ca - a a) O a) 4 r a 'C N@@ _ N E @ a rn S o a m ° d o E c o c N C N C lw9 �O m L m a N L f?i C <a N c a u�i E O @ m C m ° N N N O)° C a) @ L a7 N E O C n 7 0 � - c 4N) 7 @ @3 >. - c :� N�o o -C @ U Cm 0) m cCLo h o E o@ L N @ @ a) N o 7 0 w aai w a ° aEi L) °0 m 0 co N @ o _ m @ C: c °a @ n° @ 3 c m mOCJ N Q L o m c N o a) m t) m @ r Z n� 7 E U o E o m a) m o o N > a 7 @ @ m m @ c o r- N m a) c c N `maa m m c y Q cc o a • @pc @` E L� �_ 3 @ ui E a N 3 m E E m o m v NQ 7 c° O @ N C C A U L c m L 7 r r- oC) `p yN m ;--'-' E 000N@-� a 3 L ° � o c N c o)= 0 ^d _a= m o 0 3w @ aa) a O N ° a@ Q7 ` @ N w N O O LO c N E C w C E m5 a) c p- a) m a e n N w N rt- c N N a) a) O tm a L a) r °C N C C dO N a C @ @ O O � Q V > C y E O .-7� C) > O O— @ C N Nip c c 2' a 7i C Q O C C a Q fN = O a @ M @ =i O E m n 0 g' m o c: U m a) CL E m m .0 j fa a) N O) - N .S� 0 �.- a CL rr U a 0. '00 7 co N O N a @ U CL a) 0 CO a) 0. C w N j a @ N m O N E 2 Z' 2 C 4" @ a @ c p c w 0 U 2 C @ N O y >. c4 N c a) C c @ ca a N d 0 0 N a ° ° 0 a a) @ O N o E 7E Go ° Ca Cl. > v vi � � 0 r @ N a) a � ) N @ p >... N N 0 N a) @ a) a C E Q1 @ N 7@ yj X O ? m Q -O 0 a C U a .L... m m C@ r`-� 7 7 @ m m EN cm N @ Np3 @ u°i > coip 3 w 7 a) 7 O N a O 3 C tq a LO m E N N ` a) O � w m N 7 L .>`. C C m �' C D ..L.. L Q °" @ C O)N U U +Q) CD N.0 0 L O $ a a O) a) w- N z cu o i' o o` 3 ° a°i a N >1 > ji a °? tea oc a) �, @ = m iA w L-co N N.0 C Q a) .L... >, 0 r Y N .O N 7 U) O)>1 N 7 U C w co O r' E °' N �- r j w y m 0@ c E C �L C m co O (a ah m 00 O 7 O w. _" @ Cl)U> > N c CD ' C a) N N @ c (��6 a)LF,c rL. U C� L w> 'O a @ c a @ c E w m mZ = > m N °1woc ° @ 0 0 � o c� E @ y O 3 N Q N N �«. @ c N a)- c @ a Q a 7.c a @ a) Q N C`� v� N @ U N a) E E @ U U N @ w m Q7 N O r 0 C O N Z a O p a) C U a) N ` C �=D O a) m @ a U _ m O r. a) m@ «w p •-• Q)-O U r N O 0�0 @ O @ ""'G L C O m C O E 3 @ ` C m @ IMIJI C: _ Q C a °;a a) a �Oa a Nw N 'C 0) N o c o m N c E c E Eo �� @ m w m 0 c c > @ g a) o c 0 .o m 0 (D w (D cM " a c@ 3 m ° m U7 0) @ a) 0 c o0o p � 7 U w rn E @a 0 c c 0cr c 9 ago c > @ u r• c o a) -0-0 c m > c w o > a c E c rn m c m E 5 a w E� o o 0 u E 3 Q > >j u =w 0 >1 0 L)) 0 a (D CU � c m m D M -NC cna m0 cch n N ° E ° Co p aci °cam' w c >1 o oS' E_ m 0 E m @ C O) N U c 3 ro ❑ >�o o C O L C L C ca c Co a C N_ 7 7 @ @ N�` O N C as C N@ @ N N n c C N 0 — V U y C E N U m .0 @ >.a) ='� ° y 4= C C O .L.. .r a O m @ N cc (n@ @ C O O @ O 'C @ -0 m w O@ .± i O ` Cl) C E 7 N y C .0 L 'O ° U O U 3 a) p• -O Q @ m c� N C C m m o o a) N a) N @ vi -@o N a L N- m �° m e rn Q•- 3 v o n �� (D a) o n� coi 3@ m m E c t-r rn •o ° m � c cn p ° °o ° a) y M a) G E U Z ` N y .w w (O E [a C m U @— O) c 'V N N o)U U O a) a N c o n o:° 0 a) -o ° N@Nay N ''G mb ..L_. @ O m E EF a) N O N 0 'O m N N �.- N C N �•- o 'O "- @@ C a N C L LU 7 m C a)•mO O E 0 7 "' C � a C N a) Cd m U f m 0 N @ m c C` m O .a).. 0 O) O "" C E (') O w O) ` .�O m a n @ m @ o m N c o p@ n E S m 0 c N E 3 p r a o N a N c m �'-o a) ` ` @ 7 y @ a0 m- E an w„ o.C c 12 � m m > o o _m n aci m °-_ a) L) (a w> v a m ao>i > °� c N 0 7 � a) a E � � c� > L) N� m E ow a°i m ca m m c c a o rn Do W Q IL- @ LU Co v < 0 �� U- W > Nm ca Na ° @3 c c E� � w ¢ vo "? E �° vC S mo �w � � cCO) �a W �m v Q moN @ m v� rn N Q@ 7 @ o @ c U) t� a n Q ,.la. m m9 >1ouE 0 `0 N a aa)i cn y o ro Cl) (ao o `o m e a o N d a o m E m a w c ma m - m N m c y U O C a) N .mC w @ N .�+ 7 a) 00 b0 U @ -@O @ y �, L @ O �.- OM 0. t) .iD N E U \O Cd C c U F O_ N O a)�-' r O to _� U E m P m �mn °cL°c0 a �, Q �cc � � ¢ o m r � oa) m o a) Qom a-`t E L- ° @ n c a m _m" °cN m ° m6-5m y@ t° TV m rn O ° a) � � U 3 > (a �" a .T. O 7 « N C @ CO O y _ ° N @ C.O M a) =. > may-• 'r O "O to a) E m a N c C 7 0 C U r a) U 0 IU Q U N c c y a) E c°i mE m c E ov c c m � o 0) 04)c aan � Q oN @c� aa)i0 �c vE w, � � C y 0@ E E W Uj 2 O O U (6 � (Q O C A � ��' °CO a) w 0 o o E as o rn` „ m a w — C yO CIS o c o C C: coo , w a) y m a C a c X 7 > @ O)U) > Y o d CO j w � a yj..� Ec/iQ UE ca) -Ewa ngL° 'a am a N �� Ha o C@EEE•- [� � @@000 0o Wm > r a) ^ C yC �•- Q O ° (`o a ..L. (n C � y o a E y y 7 U U U L N 01 m c t-- fa 0 W 3 mN 3 � ya0 0c aain� No q) Cb cTir m a) to Cm y O C @ -p L U 1� ib E M L cm n d- �= O) y C m m y 0 a N ^ E; Y E p > S'a y m o N 0 �.. U C@ U) N - E a) > N Ch o- p U U O o a) m C m c o0 E N (nEw y= a) w o g w+ cm p � _ a? ch ... U C O)m i„ e-O O 7 O E @ U a U O' N P- O O U d 3 y N a y O M C0 9 U O E C lw @ .L. p E N ti O cu U) O- E >.N• LO Op L o t`«) a) 0 y d D O O 3 c@ N U en 0O-N (D C p„O m @ �- `• �0 u � vi a a) m ac) ° o O = Cl) N C 7 U O « al m E a) a)) ` U N O .L.-� LO a) L71 7 O @ mLIE o0 ° 3E yym'� d cmo 7 m o 0C) cnC .. m Z c c _ 7- x 7 a) U o N O O Y W >_ a) yy p e@ 4) N > �U N 2 r- d y a k a O y > d e C N ,�.fl C +7. �6 o E y `O >1 It >. 0 a) C U a y l!J O > (a C W a) y C 7 d .° >, 0@ c ° .>. N C@ a C �o) O (a +-+ c "d a) y U O.0 U E '0-0 CL @ o C = @ G=r N to O e d(G O (D d Q) a c co 7 U^° @ O L N "" a) c U L a) E a 7 a r N C a1 C U y a ayi 0� c a a) ca v @ E o ma m @o E "o co N 3 mx ->, L O O c E;N E O E C U a C C -0 O 0 N N O..w T cn O o Z m 3 > o a c E E a@ c@i aa) o a) o) m m ncn m ccn c a C a) a U ° ° d 0 @@@ @ a) w 0 0 N@ a y Q a 0 m C O m a) a'C.+ Q..L.. c j N O ca O o 0,L.0 N y' _ 7 7 � (n E E U O a) y (�6 n'7 a) T�. y a) w C a) r C y U N C 0 3 U a) � a) "O y U �-' fC @ a `- CL �41„L Z`a) 7 0 �- p c E N O~O U N @L„ a y U CL O C w.a)O c@ O@ C(a E N a) L N L o O O _ a) G m ° 0• m y m c Y �_ U U `'K 7 C `�- .L-. y a w a) W @ `p_ t a) 'n U s_. 01 N -_ CL a) o a) a) C y cn > y@ a E O y @ 0 E N m 0 to O C U) a) f6 O > d �"" E C N""' CO c (a L >` O C O io a= C E - y a) C 'O > C cCt `N'D c CL O.a O a) c@ 0 7 E y to U , C @ m > in - m Y �"' > m U 73 � c oo � dE oo yc0) 0 u)0o aEo � U) O o ? mm o �° y V > > C = U >. V >, 0@ U .°.O m a)_m m O (n y 'O 0 y n•E N C O E U y C C j@@ r U C m o@ 0 '0 c > @ E y m 0 °7 0@ @@ �a 0 a (Um m m x I UU �,LL EyV @ C0 U`L ..y. ma NaO m,� O cy " CNN '0 T T_ `) y 0@ ca " j O o N .r_ N a E " C p o.)� U .N 0 a) a a) L •�'•'� o _ s amp u �c m o w E s a ac) E m �r i:- p c m n 7 _ 5 � > oaOiym ca) me my mc0 E � � _ m fn = � turn Ss, of maa°' c` m`� aE ayiw ° cQ Elm m ° ta nN � cn ". � -0 N O > a.L.. m @ O N -C y .. 0 a 3 a) v x (09 f C O '� C `O y,g C U @ I N A 9 d C� y@ a @ ma c a) C >' t) d = U � ,� O w '~•V) N C a C O y '1 @ V y al O y _ Q) Y a 7 a 0 N, ~ C) '� m y a) N a U a) a) C t y C m C cc C o U� v y (D oL a0a) E � c ° � Ea1)) 0 Ego w > � NQ cn oCD 0) oNmm � i N a) O > a) a) E Ca @ >a L`�- N O ° tU.. a O Q U) N 'cm 0 ch O C oa) cE@E o E V EL aca) o 3Y0 c iV c m d O E 0 cm .LO..a o N o ¢ N p 0 ° c c c@ u N a) C a) cn O o U a) a n'_ @a) Ea) cca a car_f � co 0 a0 v cn ms 7 `= °) a O O L o aa)) (n aa)) o w, aa)) 0)O a N E o w din o to d '- - F- O -0 am) o ri c co coaaEa m0 a ° C3m r) o O� o" a " .0 = C �• C @ m e O d c @ a)) O N U C C to C ( N 4- 0 o E c0 rmy ° Q7 Eoyca a� �o 0 > o� c am m � mp U a r C O U w N y d O L a)..-0- C C N C C O .O N C O L R a) cz:lN @ @@ @ 3 ... C E ` O O ... U@ Y cu v° a) .W d O i r a) C .a L a) y •� 0 3 0 U (U 4- C O E L C y v U a y a) O al L O 7 m @ a E 7 E M d Q C p a ayiccm0 ow Cy aQiE0 0. a) yEA X E = cEa) a S] c as aca � oc Fs-- N Qc co oc Qo > = dy ^� W W > 'u'. 00 a) x ._0 m � c rn y > os m U 5 .5 @ a C Q.U in a) van @ E 6 rcn CO- m 7 o a) O L O C m ". O C C U LO E E = » "fa U) tT a p D1 U c0 >i . v a 0 N ca to a) 7 - N 7 L N C o O W ca .L.• O m U ..�.. d (+7 a) y 7 a y (a 2' (o C,4.O. Z .CIt 1 Cl 0 a T C) o 0 0 pp t C S C co O Co C H O -0 ]y 00 N Q. �O cu � Ea m � O 0 U Q U Vl C C O O O L O C' ` O C O (a- LO N t9 (0 a) L N .� _c N N O fN Fn � E N, t C O N c to .0 0)-C 0) a) 0- (am C O.(n O C coEc Era r O O L v U N a) N p C N ` U1 07 E ca N ' U N O O a) N NE N r; N � O .0 f0 O T' Ol N CD -0 a C 7 Cf)Q N N C >, O m CD o E a M O C O O O t a) N a) Q O co Q C• Co � N N C Oh I- U M N C O > O Q O Q O � O ti O O N 'a) O C . U O O � !� N h O U O N ¢ ` M Cc: M a) O ¢ I O M ` O N Clcoii U o m � co Ma Cc! U f0 U co c_' Qo NU c _ 3 M $ o � c " II O V ti � a a) C O O U C C.) O d' hM N O CEV C X U O 01 cM '0 'o Co to O R. O a) w C-O Lo N cct CD a) i 0 E U E C m CD Q O cn C O e} N Q 0 p VN � oo co mOa � b h 'Q M Q ca N p�j U a rn Q n ° > x > > o E o :' o l� OL 0 c a'o T m 3 3 m ) m 0 U C O O O T E O E > bA u `�° woo o mavio 0 0 > c m ¢ o � � m avi o, a tl�j U Eta ¢ � a w U M c0 -o G�+ x ��-+ w m c`V5n o co O-C M m(0 m 00 bA -D am) � ° r_, a°im E �' O m > N cc 0 M 0 O 0 w 0 w 'D N U m C ° 0 r m m m 0 a) m •a E 0 o a) m O- N C N m a m 0 O c ° c E m 0 o o N L m m C a m O C cc m E m N C 7 N O .- .� Oa m w N m¢O m T ' cmi Z m v - o m r a)m m m a O N U C M co N C C 'O m p C m A ° " Q. O. N n tpQ-�>>°� >i N N .0 a w O U m> L103 2 c 0 m > j m of 3 c L o m2 a) � a a) ma Q v° a� a a) 0 c E `m N E a 3 m > CD co a) >.-0 C m > C w N M Q a) U r2 N C m NO 0 m m r` E L L C Em E as w D`-cmo 3 NC O E N O N " C-U 3 N O m a) ° 7 r m E L C N C 0 o Q m a E m m 0 ` U E D C U C N c_o m m t m �Ca N w N E m m U ° m •U a) U > �' L w' C > 4- a) N•mD m L_ O CL T 3 C N N -D O C ' ..m—..-D N 7 m a) (a m O C N DI .L-. 0 Um i6 Nm > O O>I C DU N-C L.. l0 � 'mU- N C NO E 7 a N C LF, O O >' N a) Q. a) x O r- 0 N d- C C m a co a) 2) O L 7 U _ O t_ U ° m m C i C m 0 C-C E o � a) 00Z Uoa) 3 o = a) c r` a) w is > w o E c) 3 c a) 'C a) CO CO YO O N -° C O 0 j -0 m N V -D >.0 m > N 0 C N m d > C C 0 O c min E aa) wow o ami E E c r > (O C_0 U "C `p a y" a) a C_ .L- > a) La) U O¢ CO Q m a) 0 7 a c E C =C.J a ° -o a) > ,� `o) Nc a cE y E m� mm (a 3 a a) U 3 cm 0) D m T o o c m 3 mn M � o C m m a E a) C C m 7 I/7 C L•_ L 0 m �- N L U C� 0 a) C as m O o ° u L N T 0 a o ! E n m ) il Np N 3 N EN m _ ° o ° ° o" a) 0 (>m m o 01 0 O 0w wN m a) 0 a) m 0 L � O0 oGNOm m m CLNU O CU O)U � a m n m C n coi - o a) c > w -D 0 0 a) �d) p o a c E a) a) 3 > 3 c C _�' oc 0 C 0 m w m C ° � 30 •y ,p 7 O Co cam � C CV > E U "' j 4C-- CO > 0 `-. 0 , O p X p. N O � cu CD-m a) vm a m N c m Lm m rn N o w o O co v¢i Y m c m m _ c r as m >�«-. O a) O E t m N ' U C C C .,T D N a) [O a m m +� N mD api E ° > E aNi m c ° w o m x E c c m � v a� m > m a c c N m a) p m -Dm m m -0� m o a) � 0 c > Ua C m U m w (a ,-00 p >+ O °- m °-U C7 ° O` m E `y O j v� -C a) a) C 0 C m o E L)bmc — N E ,� N N yr �''• m —vmi i0 O Oa) m '� O a U m m O C ° w m T G CL w� U E ° � c vi-0 m m ° °-a m ° = <a E rn 0- � m 'aa) c ° ° > ma N > J -0 T°O. 0. N__ m 0 m N M m — _ _ ym- C2->1 r O ° E w m a Q) E m ° m= N °c) n ° a) E a ; r a m c m m C E .5 w Cd O N 0 .�mC ° m L _ U y3, vm- m U E VC a= N ` N m 7 U C n) .>'+ .a o c c m o m °� ° n axi ? m¢ m -o a W 7 m m m U m m O N C C ° C C U C a a E O C -0 U y V m C .0--. CL O N V v) N T mCD N N o o f o ° o rn° s r s. c Erm E n --°° a Cl u ad) r N H F- 0 H E U C m h- (A CA fn `) •D .NLD O Q Q - T N Cl) LLI m .. (0 .O m U N N C �°. U V' °-� N @ L .^°.. v N a " > "'E vm 7 .� ....EM CL= v .-• w 7 m O o X ° O ist 'D N W w U O m.@ U Z ,S� N O N N 00 � O O , O Q O n CD C7 "O C f0 O O ' m O O ch ' U a� m ' r u N ' m W r O O O r I O ti to ti _ t 4j 0 Lci C o ¢ d U H i N o w v 3 o o � U m � o° U) a �' 3 W U U) •i--1 H O 00 U 00 to �O NS a f6 a) c f2 O C OE N .� O O U U lLLn 4 N ` a) c U U '� N c T E C�_0 U U) U Co a) >' O co U m d U m CL O cm .- Q U p -O O '6 c (6 U U to C cn ..r N `� C N -0 '(7 U O X ca Ln C ca U U L U t f0 -C co 00 b n .N U C N a) L O a) C L Co Z, U •V � �S c [6 @ a y a) a) U N +'C-' a) Q .- L t6 a) U E = O t) E a) Lo a C U U a) O U m c O V 00 U U U C " O a) O w E U C N O E 0N En N C ri) co C ca O :a C_ O t3 N N co ' U c •C t a) V' -Q C U _ can � ^ N a) Y C C C O t a) m Co ca too 0) -O trnUo O C M caa) p G NU O _ -c 0 Ev Oco a) U O � UL.Y"a — c0 c V C -0 C N T (n U ca t6 U x V w c C_ >i C N CS E r . c o rn a) — ,. C C_ o 0 o � (n U x m a] Co a)Lr- U a) U O H-+ r— ca M C a C caO C a) C •fl C -0 C_ tF O a U O `� C_ +O+ U O > (Xa) C+ C jC ca) � �CC - . ...fl a c (6 C- O a) C a> a 0 o O a) m -00) 0 -C t6 ll a) p 2E - m 0) Uca Q. > U X C U O co ( w V C_Q U U C . NU U a) � 0) M U 'O cm -0 C m C -a -" J]Jy rNV NC. ca U 7) -0 c a) cn >wO B O CC a.� U -O a) E U Q� C ` . co a) E2 f° o a) ca ca a c -0 a) —a a C•a o o rn a N g cn m c"n o a o 0 w aNi 5 ca a cn �' (D E x C m -0 i � ( L a) o o > a Q m >' °) U c c oo c c c c — .0 .. 0- o E — m C w (n C U) ( E ro C E o �' o s' �' 3 c o o a v c�u c c :? m ao c n m m s) c n t >a) CD m o v a c w� � � L a c �j o aa) — t b« :V O F^ C U) I a) — E O � N cV xm U ca o U 0 L yy r Q CC Q. Q_ vim-- � 'S W M W O N N pq � _ 00 a •._O. N 4 a) a ,� O .�.. M c0 = a) U m O cnO U �. m M U m N m •� m 'a m m +' p co r m "-' %f .0 7 m O L i m N >' a) � Op a) 9 O a) U) N N U p a) Q m U -or- a) a ++ U U a) a) E c MO U) p y C E O O .� O a) L O a) 0 .L E m ° U c o C a c 'R m " � a) E 3 ' a) U) a O O .UC Ll u1 _Q a "X c +. a) al j 0 m ..r .«� N a) O N m o j o o �t w E Q E cn i m O Q co a :... a O O. ` n a) a) Q O �— a) O O. V.- Q) O V) O ' Q E O -C +. N (D O > c U) O- N ry O U N 7 U O T X a) O m a ca p V) c a) S� N U — U U C1 a) m (n -�+ •-- '= a) Q V) o S E c c c c "- -a m Z co a) m m O a v a`) 5 (n `o w L) m rn U) C) c a) cu rn � c o — ma o � 42 o t o m F— a E M m 3 0 C.) a) m -.j a a) 6 a a a L a3 > °� m Qaa)) o a oa •T �° o a) w m ° m c > E o E u) n = rn E a , aEi c a) o n- " o > o co a o r a u c c a O O a L a N O m p C O cq a) r �, c E a a) m a) — a a m E U � fn Qa m a s - m a) .. a) a) a>i M U M m m Lm N M a) a 00 a E c m c -0M ui o a) o a) m rn a) a c (n m Lna s ch N o O O) j > 7 46 � a a .� a) m -0 n c 3 m ° o m c ` cu ) u MCL r V) a (n g a a m o — p E c E cn .0 E m 3 m a o a) ammi a) a o `) vi = m o m " E a) c) L a) 3 M y a c s m aMi U o m o i 0 m cpi 0 > m` Y- -C c a cMi m e a) a w a y m a) .c c a a v 3 U m e m -o m m w w p m � m m c a) U E a O a cn m t 7 V a) •> m Co 0 c p LO L o i m N m .cca c M m m m i a t a H — N m C aa)) o E a cn Ei ai s m c cmi w o a) r c r W CL - a) M > E m rn c ca a 3 ca r M cn i U > c O a) O -O >. rn ;F+ m N a O T m T = T W m "E .1-a o 0 Q' 7 o m 0 N m U p M w - m a) - ca m a Q u) Q m - "� � cmi c 0 m E E cm) > m "W — a) co a) m a) , j T COO C .� ? NV. E N N c CU m >, p U N COO d L gyp-• a) t Y (U C .-- O) N U) .O U) .� O- M O m c a) M O 6 co .�.. w a i O p C Q c M O a) N p O C "'1 Q Z O CU F ` Z O m m a) U 0 'E a O C `� I`a 7 m w N -� N �rj ... a) M O. a :._� O U) O cu N 4? — Z a) O_ E m C_ E E — o U U U t a � M o CuH U m m fE m N c `� p O N Q m m °? ufli U m m r Q m a) U c F T Q v p v r U V \ / � # & 6 f 0 / \ CL -0 f k a CL co E R ± G a) CL \ \ o CL \ \ § c > \ \ m - a \ / y 2 [ # _ \ � a a \ \ \ � cn \ >1 ` cn m L) 0 \ B \ D U) \ % 2 G 2 / m c \ ® » r @ \ f o \ / -C / E k \ ] \ @ & \ 0 % \ 0 S a) CIA } m ¥ /_ \ \ k f $ 5 ) § \ \ / ( & \ ~0 \ m CO ) G § ® 2 > & k \ CL U a) G k bo Q $ g G f ca » ® 3 e E / / $ / ) / § \ G \ \ s / E } Z g e 2 /0 o e L a) z \ 2 / a) / a 6 % u S E . � A U -------- -- —-------- — � @ o :41 a N 00 O C)Q) — C O II > LL N \ p a) � IIC a ( � Na cu ca Co c N O) O U N CO O 0-C C13 CIS m s L C L C L N C C ' O O X O a) v) a C 0 A a) IZ US C •@ w w -0 a) p +� U) w- O �. U C O a) a) 'U C LL C LL .:3 U � •r_ (D It II a) a ._ a) Q 'CJ Q a) C coC N a `0 0 0 0 o n ro Z a U a) o a) a o a`ai m EL > c > a .. o - o a U O X aCL C O „""' a) O (n L +n (1) a) a) L a) a) m L O CO 7 � a (n >� N U tS0 En m p. c O C (U6 UJ U 00 [a U N U N Q) U O ~ 0 0 0 Q p N (C6 (`0 O N X X 0 X 0 m > " U �— O C C to C U C cc U) a) ami T N � w m m a) O m c a C >1 C O p aC C m 0 OU ca =pU U Q a a a) 0) � OO a a) a) a)" C -FO .X UCO p) O) a) d _Q � > O a a a C a Co a CDO cm > c `+' Y(aU C �m C C O C •- C Z ti/ ' .0 a) m a) E 0 U ca a zi O a) a -a U = a)a) a) —1 Q � ) + IT 0- tl CL LL o_ d u a 7 ,r 7 4 j 7 t C II C a) m o O) Co � Co IT 0 0 O L > o) z O r -Q C U C O .= O C H Q) Q m (� ID FD C (D O N O a) ❑ ❑ ❑ II X O a) II N 0 o -a co -0 -0 a) m ami a- 0 0- o o- o cca [ri am In L) m aa)) ,_ °� en -• o o ca o Y o 0) o - Q d `t it 11 � � a m a (a N ) N V U r N co C O- 0 (n C O LL E +-' to _cn C .�-• U) ❑ ❑ ❑ N (�D N U O D O a o -a N D r N M Q- EL O = 3 a) d a a U a - a ca U U U X m N ca o a r O p a) LL p 0 0 3 0 (n E a) U m s a) ^O a) m Ill m II N LL II Cl) II 0 ]I m L) It ccaa r N c+7 U C a) Q) a ( d d v m X U 0 x ❑ m d d d H a LL H d d- 0 N N bA00 Cc O O a) W 0 O N O � U +O- 7 O m 2 = O c U s O m m O CL (� O) v0- O = E N m a II II II II II II 11 II ' a) c 2 C) N 7 O a) E +O. a .r � C O 0 f° U U m co c O .N •+ `�' m �_ L C C a) p w L C N p �- d a) w = `� O w a O + _� m p + rn N 'C .U) a) o c Q _U c p N C C o a) Q) O L V a _0 U X .a+ a-. •C.) co >m m a L a (a a o N , >+ a) m o a) to m c m U > a � U Q .T ♦+ N a) c c m c a E a) C a) !Z fl a m aci aCLi o c o m a X o 3 U r.coa i a)o -0 o m c ) mo arpn)v o m a a f p 0oo a o poE : o pac p n 4° a) 0) 0` a) p 0 0@ o o 0 0 � � . o0 0. a a (D m � 0- a) `° E o � mc a) ) 2) c x o Ua) a) t _ Uc co cn aoi co p Jr- p p) Q E L , C aO p) c- a,a) Q) ( O O t) m m 0 mj Um NO �0) O a)LL -0 () ` O u) () a) O U)Q E + E + No to 00 L LL Uc . N U a C40If cL j O N coi w ul v Q LW LL .0 C j Q) m w z o 0 0 U) a o_ 0 a) II -2 .. E 0) > o m -- [� m .() p L ;x p to a) N U c L c o o ° a) a "' -0 U c`a �y p N E 0 ca c E m o 0 z O) O o. 0 a) m p O i m a) a) 0 E E m c acu a)) a E m o Q Q Q Q m m m m a O m L 0 " a_ 7 0 L 1 x m 0 z m .S m M o : a) ✓' m U) ' C) o a) Fes— C .�-. p o to U a N m M � -• a Z N c F < m N i+ d.' o 0 00 M N U � � O �I i It II II II II II II 11 L 0 rn w N O U EU C i L x N O N ..-. 3 00 .>1 t O C C \ N N � � C U N U 3 C) E X x U 'aL v 0 N m N C N N E .0 N +> > -O a) QJ C N .-. � x N O 4- O N co +-.. y-. .-. r+ >. N L C C C C C N > L C Q Q L x ..0 .0 CO 0 co U) E U) U) U) 0 w -0> ° Q a- QQ o- 0 Q : -0 4) E w ++ W. ; IZ a) QQ (n ° •�... O .� � ° •� O Q) m L o C (a 'a " Y Z _— O ar 0 m O � 0 U (U � -a E 16 (� O U �+ U ca M O C �i ca "_' r- (tf (6 C [0 X Co to U Q U U N "' 7 0 7 0 7 O cu U — U O M "- tS "O 07 o c U N U U C N C N N ° C O U .:3 U U f0 O ,� (U O o m U) rn � �' a w a a� a c _c 11 i O o x o to cn a) > o ``�-° — ❑ � -� o xo x E x -a m 0 'r- ai L U X s x x Y ch x °C N rn ° U O N N N o N fn ❑ r C U L � +- L% •C °O t L a "O N "0 x �„ U .a U .� + .^. (6 C C C _ ( O 0 N O E X o N "a Or_C E o `� OL m N L O L U U U Y U Y ° Y ❑ O O —N C U 0 0 + E O 'O O L + U (6 U O U ,0 + --O + L N o "'O Q O N 0 V 0 m r V r U O U O O 11 Y W = U o m x m cn m ❑ Sul =x U 0) c 44 a H � c o 0 �"� II II II II II 11 II II tis Q mUj. � a r N M II r N m 11 U U O U U U U ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ f— I.L F- U 0 ,.y 33U .N-� @ \ � k ® 2 CD � � � § k k / / a 1 - 8 k o / ? _ -0 k\ k / ƒ c Q. m= m 7 2 / 0 / C) \ 2 & a 3 ] � / § 9 / ® \ ƒ ® m / 0 CO) \ co \ 6 + r_ z _\ 2 \ 0 � � School District Capital Facilities Plans 2010/11 to 2015/16 Impact Fee Calculation-Single Family and Multifamily Kent Federal Way Auburn Site Cost SFR $ 2,562.28 $ -0- $ -0- MFR $ 2,094.11 $ -0- $ -0- Construction Cost SFR $421469.34 $ 15,199 $19,325.67 MFR $25,694.63 $ 7,151 $ 5,239.71 Temporary Facility Cost SFR $ 74.98 $ 25 $ 71.32 1 MFR $ 51.07 $ 8 $ 19.48 State Match Credit SFR $ 7,447.90 $ 3,518 $ 7,227.84 MFR $ 4,484.96 $ 1,655 $ 1,722.59 Tax Credit SFR $ 3,588.18 $ 3,678 $ 1,636.49 MFR $ 1,412.92 $ 1,160 $ 500.16 Impact Fee SFR $ 5,486 (+ 1.7%) $ 4,014 (+4.7%) $ 5,266.33(- 3.1%) MFR $ 3,378 (+ 1.7%) 2,172 (+2.7%) $ 1,518.22(+28.2%) % financed by fees 25.7% 1 2.1% ? Impact Fees History 2000-2011 Kent Federal Way Auburn Kent Federal Way Auburn P01 MFR $5,486 $4,014 $5,266.33 2011 $3,378 $2,172 $1,518.22 5,394 3,832 5,432.70 2010 3,322 2,114 1,184.71 5,304 4,017 5,374.64 2009 3,266 1,733 877.02 2008 5,110 3,883 5,361.04 2008 3,146 1,647 465.78 2007 4,928 3,018 5,657.05 2007 3,034 856 1,228.84 2006 4,775 3,393 5,681.36 2006 2,940 895 1,536.30 2005 4,056 2,868 5,296.90 2005 1,762 905 1,831.85 2004 4,292 3,269 4,528.00 2004 2,643 940 1,212.00 2003 4,147 3,865 N/A 2003 2,554 1,086 N/A 2002 3,782 2,616 N/A 2002 2,329 896 N/A 2001 3,782 21710 N/A 2001 2,329 830 N/A ' 2000 3,782 2,384 NIA 2000 2,329 786 N/A S\PemitTlanNCOW PLAN-AMEND1AENTSV20101CPA-2010.1 Sch1DIslsCFPsUpda(c%CPA.2010-i cepfocdillegablei doc School District Capital Facilities Plans 2010/11 to 2015/16 Kent Federal Way Auburn Area Cost Allowance $174.26 $180.17 $180.17 ' State Match% 56.06% 61.86% 60.23% ' District Average AV SFR $277,I29 $267,668 $254,009 MFR 109,125 84,429 76,573 ' Debt Service Capital Levy Rate/$1000 $1.72 $1.72 $0.82 Bond Interest Rate 4.33% 4.33% 4.33% iIssues: Kent: Construct new elementary school, replace 2 elementary schools, and expand 2 high schools, elementary school site acquisition Federal Way: Modernization and expansion—4 Elementary Schools, 1 Middle School Auburn: 1 Elementary School site acquisition 1 Elementary School construction 1 Middle School construction Technology Modernization Facility Improvements Replacement of three aging schools S\Pen*\Plan\CONBP_PLAN ANMNDbfENTS\2010\CPA-2010-1 SchlDtstsCFPsUpdatc\CPA-2010-I copfacihoostable2.doc i t ' School District Capital Facilities Plans—2010/11 to 2015/16 General Statistics Kent Federal Way Auburn Student Generation SFR Elementary .486 .3507 .3080 Middle .130 .1701 .1470 Sr High .250 .2361 .1770 MFR Elementary .331 0.165 0.086 Middle .067 0.053 0.038 ' Sr High .124 0.064 0.031 FTE Enrollment 2009/10 25,778 20,451 13,920 Capacity 2009/10 27,531 19,904 13,725 Class Size K =24 K- 2 = 20 K—2 =25 1-4 - 25 3 - 5 -25 3 - 4 =27 5 - 6 =29 6 - 12=26 5 = 30 7 - 8 - 29 6-12 = 30 9-12—30 S\Pe ,\PWMCOMP PLAN AWNDMENT1120101CPA-2010-1 SchlDistsCFPsUPdme\CPA-2010-I caP(acd0wstable7 doc 1 1 1 1 - 1 2011 - 2016 Capital Improvement Program Sources of Funding Amounts in 00O's Grants Other Sources Capital General Fund 6% 5% Improvement Fund 4% 23% Facilities Fund „ 2% Utility Funds 60% jTotal 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Sources of Funds Capital Improvement Fund 41,639 2,574 7,025 15,600 6,845 5,925 3,670 Utility Funds 107,486 18,755 16,760 14,895 19,510 18,225 19,341 Facilities Fund 4,290 430 715 725 790 1,040 590 General Fund 6,400 600 800 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 Grants 10,210 289 1,736 2,635 2,740 2,305 505 Other Sources 9,237 2,588 870 890 3,970 895 24 Total Sources of Funds 179,262 25,236 27,906 35,995 35,105 29,640 25,380 t 2011 - 2016 Capital Improvement Program Projects Forecast Amounts in 000's General Government Transportation 8% Public Safety 3% 6% r s7� Parks, Rec&Comm Services Utilities 21% 62% Total 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Proiects General Government 13,907 4,426 1,966 1,895 1,890 2,090 1,640 Public Safety 10,555 195 1,295 8,280 245 345 195 Transportation 6,400 600 800 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 Parks, Rec &Comm Services 37,914 1,260 6,335 8,925 11,460 6,980 2,954 Utilities 110,486 18,755 17,510 15,645 20,260 18,975 19,341 Total Projects 179,262 25,236 27,906 35,995 35,105 29,640 25,380 2 , General Government 2011 - 2016 Capital Improvement Program Amounts in Thousands iTotal 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Sources of Funds CIP Revenues 7,104 1,489 1,245 1,170 1,100 1,050 1,050 Facilities Revenues 4,290 430 715 725 790 1,040 590 King County Grant 45 39 6 LTGO Bonds 2,468 2,468 Total Sources of Funds 13,907 4,426 1,966 1,895 1,890 2,090 1,640 Proiects Funded Facilities Centennial Center Upgrades 140 0 45 45 50 Emergency Facility Repairs (Lifecycle) 850 100 150 150 150 150 150 Facilities Card Access 150 0 75 75 Floor Covering Replacements (Lifecycle) 690 40 150 250 200 50 HVAC Lifecycle Replacements (Lifecycle) 1,800 300 300 300 300 300 300 Kent Pool Improvements 25 25 Kitchen Equipment (Lifecycle) 125 25 25 25 25 25 Parks Maintenance Renovation 35 35 Roof Repairs (Lifecycle) 705 330 75 300 Sealcoat Parking Lots (Lifecycle) 420 125 100 65 65 65 Senior Center Upgrades 40 40 Technology 0 Hardware Lifecycle Replacements 3,139 639 500 S00 500 500 500 Software Business System Replacements 3,000 500 500 500 500 500 500 Tech Plan 2008 - 2012 2,468 2,468 Other General Government 0 ' Communities Putting Prevention To Work 45 39 6 Neighborhood Matching Grant Funds 275 25 50 50 50 50 50 Total Projects Funded 13,907 4,426 1,966 1,895 1,890 2,090 1,640 1 1 1 1 1 3 Public Safety 2011 - 2016 Capital Improvement Program Amounts in Thousands Total 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Sources of Funds CIP Revenues 10,555 195 1,295 8,280 245 345 195 Total Sources of Funds 10,555 195 1,295 8,280 245 345 195 Proiects Funded Technology Public Safety MDC Replacements 1,170 195 195 195 195 195 195 Police Services AR-15 Rifles 75 75 Crime Scene Van Replcmnt/Equip Upgrd 75 75 Ergonomic Work Stations 90 90 Pursuit Intervention Technique Equip 25 25 , Robotic Laser Scanning Total Station 50 50 Satellite Processing of Traffic NOIs 170 100 70 Police /Fire Training Center Annex Furniture Upgrades 25 25 Citywide Driving Simulator 150 150 Expansion Police/Fire Training Center 8,640 750 7,890 Training Center Classroom Upgrades 25 25 Other Public Safety CKCF Renovation 0 0 Work Crew Van/Trailer Equipment 60 60 Total Projects Funded 10,555 195 1,295 8,280 245 345 195 1 t � 1 4 Transportation 2011 - 2016 Capital Improvement Program Amounts in Thousands Total 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Sources of Funds General Fund Revenues 6,400 600 800 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 Total Sources of Funds 6,400 600 800 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 Proiects Funded Other Transportation Sidewalk Rehabilitation and Installation 2,600 300 300 500 500 500 500 Miscellaneous Asphalt Overlays 3,800 300 500 750 750 750 750 Total Projects Funded 6,400 600 800 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 N 1 5 j Parks, Rec & Comm Services 2011 - 2016 Capital Improvement Program Amounts in Thousands Total 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Sources of Funds CIP REET2 Revenues 21,805 865 3,985 5,650 4,950 4,230 2,125 CIP Revenues 2,175 25 500 500 550 300 300 Donations / Contributions 90 15 15 15 15 15 15 King County Grant 760 170 175 180 235 Other Grant 1,155 80 555 5 505 5 5 Source To Be Determined 3,679 105 105 125 3,205 130 9 WA State Grant 8,250 1,000 2,450 2,000 2,300 500 Total Sources of Funds 37,914 1,260 6,335 8,925 11,460 6,980 2,954 Proiects Funded 132nd Street Park Development 2,100 100 1,700 300 Adopt-A-Park Volunteer Program 240 40 40 40 40 40 40 Annexation Expansion 0 0 Architect/Engineering 50 10 10 10 10 10 Briscoe Park Renovation 150 150 Clark Lake Development 1,050 50 1,000 Clark Lake Land Acquisition 2,000 1,000 1,000 Community Parks Reinvestment Prgrm 600 100 100 100 100 100 100 Community Sports Fields 7,600 100 3,300 200 4,000 Downtown Gateways, Phase 2 750 0 150 150 150 150 150 Eagle Creek Park Development 1,000 1,000 Eagle Scout Volunteer Program 210 35 35 35 35 35 35 East Hill Park Land Acquisition 700 200 500 Eastridge Park Renovation 100 100 Event Center Lifecycle 1,800 300 300 300 300 300 300 Garrison Creek Renovation 750 750 Grant Matching Funds/Land Acq. 375 0 75 75 75 75 75 Green Tree Park Renovation 100 100 House Demolition 25 25 Huse Property Development 1,150 50 100 1,000 International Parks Acq./Development 50 50 Kent Memorial Park Renovation 200 200 Kent Parks Foundation 150 25 25 25 25 25 25 Kiwanis Tot Lot #3 Renovation 75 75 Lake Fenwick Park Renovation 1,200 0 1,200 Lake Meridian Park Ren. & Master Plan 3,200 0 1,200 2,000 ' Life Cycle - Trails 54 9 9 9 9 9 9 Life Cycle Park System 1,730 346 346 346 346 346 Major Entries into Kent 250 0 50 50 50 50 50 Master Plans 150 25 25 25 25 25 25 6 Parks, Rec & Comm Services 2011 - 2016 Capital Improvement Program Amounts in Thousands Meridian Glen Renovation 50 50 Mill Creek/Greenway Plan & Renovation 725 75 50 250 350 North Meridian Park Renovation 200 200 Old Fishing Hole Renovation 150 150 Panther Lake PAA Park Acquisition 400 400 Park and Open Space Plan 25 25 Park Orchard Park Renovation 0 0 Pine Tree Park Renovation 50 50 Regional Trails - Levy Program 710 170 175 180 185 Rive rwaIk/Riverview Park Development 130 130 Russell Road Playground 200 200 S 272nd St Neighborhood Park Dev 100 100 Salt Air Vista Park Renovation 50 50 Scenic Hill Park Renovation 350 350 Security Camera Software Upgrade 0 0 Seven Oaks Park Renovation 0 0 Springwood Park Improvements 2,100 100 2,000 Tudor Square Renovations 0 0 Urban Forestry Program/Green Kent 60 10 10 10 10 10 10 Valley Flr Athletic Complex Acq & Dev 500 500 Van Doren's Park Improvements 300 150 150 West Fenwick Park Renovation 1,585 85 1,500 West Hill Park Development 1,920 100 1,820 Wilson Playfields Acq/Renovation 500 500 Total Projects Funded 37,914 1,260 6,335 8,925 11,460 6,980 2,954 7 Utilities 2011 - 2016 Capital Improvement Program Amounts in Thousands Total 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Sources of Funds Water Revenues 46,376 10,150 8,425 4,930 7,285 7,790 7,796 Sewer Revenues 4,100 1,600 500 500 500 500 500 Drainage Revenues 57,010 7,005 7,835 9,465 11,725 9,935 11,045 Source To Be Determined 3,000 750 750 750 750 Total Sources of Funds 110,486 18,755 17,510 15,645 20,260 18,975 19,341 Proiects Funded Stormwater Management NPDES 1,540 240 240 250 260 270 280 Miscellaneous Drainage Improvement 1,590 265 265 265 265 265 265 Drainage Infrastructure Replacements 15,600 1,500 2,000 2,500 2,900 3,200 3,500 Lake Fenwick 500 500 Miscellaneous Habitat Improvements 1,080 530 550 Green River Levee Repair 17,000 2,500 2,500 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 Upper Mill Creek Dam Improvements 2,500 2,500 South 228th Drainage Bypass 3,200 800 2,400 Mill Creek Pump Station 1,000 1,000 Mill Creek @ James Flood Protection 4,800 500 4,300 Green River Natural Resource Center 3,200 1,000 2,200 Central Avenue Storm Drainage 5,000 1,000 4,000 Sanitary Sewer Miscellaneous Sewer Replacements 4,100 1,600 500 500 500 500 500 Water Supply & Distribution Miscellaneous Water Improvements 10,500 1,750 1,750 1,750 1,750 1,750 1,750 Tacoma Pipeline 8,700 1,400 650 650 2,000 2,000 2,000 Guiberson Reservoir Replacement 7,500 3,500 4,000 Kent Springs Transmission Main Repair 1,500 1,500 Meeker Street Pump Station 1,000 1,000 Seismic Improvements 500 100 100 100 100 100 Large Meter & Vault Replacement 476 85 90 95 100 106 Easements/Land Acquisitions 10,500 1,500 2,000 2,000 2,500 2,500 ' Rock Creek Mitigation Projects 2,500 1,000 300 300 300 300 300 Security Improvements 50 10 10 10 10 10 ' Hydrant Replacement Program 150 30 30 30 30 30 Automated Meter Reading 3,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 East Hill Maintenance Facility 3,000 750 750 750 750 Total Projects Funded 110,486 18,755 17,510 15,645 20,260 18,975 19,341 8 ECONOMIC and COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Ben Wolters, Director PLANNING SERVICES Fred N. Satterstrom, AICP, Planning Director Charlene Anderson, AICP, Manager KENT Phone: 253-856-5454 WASHINGTON Fax: 253-856-6454 Address: 220 Fourth Avenue S Kent, WA 98032-5895 CITY OF KENT ADDENDUM TO THE KENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Responsible Official: Charlene Anderson SCOPE The City of Kent has completed environmental analysis, pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), for an amendment of the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan to include the City's 2011-2016 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). This amendment to the Capital Facilities Element is occurring concurrently with the adoption of the City's 2011 operating budget as provided by RCW 36.70A.130. The GMA requires cities and counties to approve and maintain a six (6) year capital facilities plan which includes requirements for specific types of capital facilities, measurable levels-of-service (LOS) standards, financial feasibility, and assurance that adequate facilities are provided as population and employment growth occurs. Kent's annual budget document and six-year CIP fulfill the GMA requirement for facilities planning. In addition, these documents serve as a foundation for the city's fiscal management and eligibility for grants and loans. The CIP and annual budget, along with the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan provide coordination among the city's many plans for capital improvements. The annual budget and six-year CIP contain broad goals and specific financial policies that guide and implement the provisions for adequate public services and facilities. The six-year CIP is a funding mechanism to implement projects and programs identified in the City's Comprehensive Plan. Specifically, the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan contains goals and policies related to the provision and maintenance of public services and capital facilities which are necessary to support the projected growth over the next twenty (20) years. The goals and policies of the Capital Facilities Element are consistent with the Land Use, Transportation and Parks and Open Space Elements. The Comprehensive Plan EIS, draft and final, evaluated the growth potential as identified in the City's Comprehensive Plan. The adoption of the six-year CIP concurrently with the city's annual budget is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan EIS - Addendum Capital Improvement Program 2011-2016 Comprehensive Plan EIS analysis as the types of projects and programs identified in the CIP are specifically related to the growth projections in the Comprehensive Plan and EIS. SEPA COMPLIANCE In October 1993, the City of Kent issued a Determination of Significance (DS) and Notice of Scoping for the Comprehensive Plan (ENV-93-51). After a series of public meetings, a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) was issued on July 18, 1994 for the Draft Comprehensive Plan, issued on the same date. The DEIS was distributed to City Council and Planning Commission members, adjacent jurisdictions, affected agencies and other parties of interest. After comments on the DEIS were solicited and reviewed, a Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) was issued and distributed on January 30, 1995. This Addendum to the Kent Comprehensive Plan EIS evaluates the adoption of the six-year CIP. No additional Impacts are Identified since the CIP implements projects and programs identified and evaluated in the City's Comprehensive Plan and Comprehensive Plan EIS. STATEMENT OF CONSISTENCY Future projects associated with the CIP will be subject to and shall be consistent with the following: City of Kent Comprehensive Plan, the Kent City Code, International Fire Code, International Building Code, Public Works Standards and all other applicable laws and ordinances in effect at the time a complete project permit application is filed. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW - BACKGROUND The City of Kent has followed the process of phased environmental review as it undertakes actions to implement the Comprehensive Plan, The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and rules established for the act, WAC 197- 11, outline procedures for the use of existing environmental documents and preparing addenda to environmental decisions. Nonproject Documents - An EIS prepared for a comprehensive plan, development regulation, or other broad based policy documents are considered "non-project," or programmatic in nature (see WAC 197-11-704). These are distinguished from EISs or environmental documents prepared for specific project actions, such as a building permit or a road construction project. The purpose of a non-project EIS is to analyze proposed alternatives and to provide environmental consideration and mitigation prior to adoption of an alternative. It is also a document that discloses the process used in evaluating alternatives to decision-makers and citizens. Phased Review - SEPA rules allow environmental review to be phased so that li review coincides with meaningful points in the planning and decision making process, (WAC 197-11-060(5)). Broader environmental documents may be followed by narrower documents that incorporate general discussion by reference and concentrate solely on issues specific to that proposal. SEPA Page 2 of 4 tComprehensive Plan EIS — Addendum Capital Improvement Program 2011-2016 rules also clearly state that agencies shall use a variety of mechanisms, including addenda, adoption and incorporation by reference, to avoid duplication and excess paperwork. Future projects identified and associated with the implementation of the Capital Improvement Program may require individual and separate environmental review, pursuant to SEPA. Such review will occur when a specific project is identified. Prior Environmental Documents - The City of Kent issued a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for the Comprehensive Plan on July 18, 1994 (#ENV-93-51). The DEIS analyzed three comprehensive plan land use alternatives, and recommended mitigation measures, which were used in preparing comprehensive plan policies. The preferred land use alternative which was incorporated into the Comprehensive Plan was most closely related to Alternative 2 of the DEIS, (the mixed-use alternative). A Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) was issued on January 30, 1995, and the Comprehensive Plan was adopted by the City Council on April 18, 1995. Scope of Addendum — As outlined in the SEPA rules, the purpose of an addendum is to provide environmental analysis with respect to the described actions. This analysis builds upon the Comprehensive Plan EIS but does not substantially change the identified impacts and analysis; therefore it is prudent to utilize the addendum process as outlined in WAC-197-11- 600(4)(c). ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS All environmental elements were adequately addressed within the parameters of the City of Kent Comprehensive Plan EIS, draft and final. Further, subsequent "project" actions would require the submittal of separate environmental checklists, pursuant to SEPA, which will be analyzed for consistency with the original mitigating conditions and may require new mitigation based upon site-specific conditions. The adoption of the six-year CIP implements goals and policies identified in the City's Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan. Specifically, the CIP implements the following: Goa! CF-1 — As the City of Kent continues to grow and develop, ensure that ' an adequate supply and range of public services and capital facilities are available to provide satisfactory standards of public health, safety, and quality of life. Policy CF1.2 — Ensure that public services and capital facilities needs are addressed in updates to the Capital Facilities Plans and Capital Improvement Programs, and development regulations as appropriate. Goa/ CF-4 — Ensure that appropriate funding sources are available to acquire ' or bond for the provision of needed public services and facilities. Page 3 of 4 Comprehensive Plan EIS - Addendum Capital Improvement Program 2011-2016 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY Kent City Code section 11.03.510 identifies plans and policies from which the City may draw substantive mitigation under the State Environmental Policy Act. This nonproject action has been evaluated in light of those substantive plans and policies as well as within the overall analysis completed for the City's Comprehensive Plan EIS. DECISION The City of Kent Comprehensive Plan EIS, draft and final, provided analysis with regard to the implementation of the Comprehensive Plan elements, goals and policies. This includes the implementation of the Capital Facilities Element and Capital Improvement Programs. The City has reviewed the 2011-2016 CIP and has found it to be consistent with the range, types and magnitude of impacts and corresponding mitigation outlined in the Comprehensive Plan EIS. The adoption of the six-year CIP does not substantially change any identified related impacts in the Comprehensive Plan EIS. This analysis and subsequent addendum did not identify any new significant impacts associated with the adoption of the 2011-2016 CIP. Therefore, this addendum, combined with the Comprehensive Plan EIS adequately evaluates potential adverse environmental impacts and provides appropriate mitigation for this nonproject action. Based upon this analysis, a separate threshold determination is not required. This document and corresponding environmental record may be utilized in the future in conjunction with environmental review for future projects identified in the CIP in accordance with the guidelines provided by WAC 197-11. Lx2 Dated: October 22, 2010 Signature: i C� Charlene Anderson, AICP, Responsible Official CA•Jm\\S:\Permit\Plan\Env\2010\CIPaddendum2011-2016 doc I Page 4 of 4 ' KENT WASHINOTON ADOPTION OF EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS Adoption Document(s): EIS Description of current proposal: The action proposed by the City consists of the adoption of an updated Capital Improvement Program concurrent with the 2011 city operating budget. The Capital Improvement Plan is an element of the City's Comprehensive Plan. Proponent: City of Kent jLocation of proposal: The proposal is a city-wide action. I Title of documents) being adopted: City of Kent Comprehensive Plan Environmental Impact Statement Draft (July 1994) and Final (January 1995) — Prepared by the City of Kent. Description of document (or portion being adopted: The City of Kent Comprehensive Plan EIS is being adopted in total. This document evaluated three different land use alternatives for the city. The analysis evaluated the type and range of impacts to the environment associated with each land use alternative and associated development regulations. iIf the document has been challenged (WAC 197-11-630) please describe: The document was not challenged. jDocument availability: This document is available for review at the City of Kent Planning Services office, 400 West Gowe, Kent, WA 98032 from 8:00 am to 5:00 pm. We have identified and adopted this document as being appropriate for this I proposal after independent review. Along with the addendum, this document meets our environmental review needs for the current proposal and will accompany the proposal to the decisionmaker(s). tName of agency adopting the document: City of Kent I Contact person/Responsible Official: Charlene Anderson, AICP (253) 856-5431 Planning Manager City of Kent Community Development Dept. 220 Fourth Ave South Kent, WA 98032 Date: October 22, 2010 Signature: 4! G/�/G�fta----- S:\Permit\Plan\Env\2010\CIPadopt2011-2016.doc Kent City Council Meeting Date November 2, 2010 Category Public Hearings - 5D 1. SUBJECT: 2010 TAX LEVY FOR 2011 BUDGET I 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: This date has been set as the public hearing on the 2010 Tax Levy for the 2011 budget. Public input is welcome. r r 3. EXHIBITS: None 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Finance Director (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure'? N/A Revenue? N/A Currently in the Budget? Yes _ No 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: A. Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds ' to close the public hearing. B. Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds i DISCUSSION: ACTION: PUBLIC COMMENT Kent City Council Meeting Date November 2, 2010 Item No. 7A - 7B CONSENT CALENDAR 7. City Council Action: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds to approve Consent Calendar Items A through I. Discussion Action 7A. Approval of Minutes. Approval of the minutes of the regular Council meeting of October 19, 2010. 7B. Approval of Bills. Figures are not available. Kent City Council Meeting KENT ' October 19, 2010 J�IPS y11.GTOP ` The regular meeting of the Kent City Council was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Cooke. Councilmembers present: Albertson, Harmon, Higgins, Perry, Ranniger, Raplee, and Thomas. (CFN-198) CHANGES TO THE AGENDA A. From Council, Administration, Staff. (CFN-198) Consent Calendar Item "I" (S. 2771h Corridor Interlocal Agreement for Valley Communications Fiber Optic Cable and Equipment) was removed from the agenda, and Other Business Item "A" and Executive Session Item "B" were added to the agenda. B. From the Public. (CFN-198) No changes were made. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS A. Public Recocinition. (CFN-198) Albertson commended the Kent School District and the Kent Parks Department on their efforts in the community. B. Community Events. (CFN-198) Ranniger announced the opening of the off- leash dog park on East Hill on October 23, 2010, and encouraged citizens to attend. C. Public Safety Report. (CFN-122) Police Chief Strachan updated statistics for September and October and explained the benefits of the new monitoring equipment for those who serve their sentences at home. He described recent cost-saving changes made by jail staff including the number of hours worked by inmates, and announced two recent promotions within the department. PUBLIC COMMENT In response to the Mayor's request, a member of Boy Scout Troop 945 explained that he is working on a merit badge in citizenship. (CFN-198) CONSENT CALENDAR Perry moved to approve Consent Calendar Items A through P, with the exception of I. Thomas seconded and the motion carried. A. Approval of Minutes. (CFN-198) Minutes of the regular Council meeting of October 5, 2010, were approved. B. Approval of Bills. (CFN-104) Payment of the bills received through September 15 and paid on September 15 after auditing by the Operations Committee on October 5, 2010, were approved. Approval of checks issued for vouchers: Date Check Numbers Amount 9/15/10 Wire Transfers 4299-4317 $2,515,531.10 9/15/10 Regular Checks 646561-647003 1,189,440.39 Void Checks 646900 (641.40) Use Tax Payable 949.08 $3,705,279.17 1 Kent City Council Minutes October 19, 2010 Payment of the bills received through September 30 and paid on September 30 after auditing by the Operations Committee on October 5, 2010, was approved. Approval of checks issued for vouchers: Date Check Numbers Amount 9/30/10 Wire Transfers 4318-4331 $2,630,128.60 9/30/10 Regular Checks 647004-647482 3,848,484.65 Void Checks 647006 (430.00) Use Tax Payable 448.64 $6,478,631.89 Checks issued for payroll for September 1 through September 15 and paid on September 20, 2010, was approved: Date Check Numbers Amount 9/20/10 Checks 319729-319941 $ 181,616.07 9/20/10 Advices 273078-273679 1,154,218.28 $1,335,834.35 Checks issued for payroll for September 16 through September 30 and paid on October 5, 2010, was approved: Date Check Numbers Amount 10/5/10 Checks 319942-320153 $ 170,165.37 10/5/10 Advices 273680-274286 1,161,607.07 $1,331,772.44 C. Countywide Planning Policies Amendment Resolution. (CFN-961) Resolution No. 1835, ratifying the King County Countywide Planning Policies (CPPs) adopted by the Metropolitan King County Council and pursuant to the Growth Management Act, was adopted. The amendments to the CPPs amend the interim Potential Annexation Area (PAA) map to expand the PAA for the City of Renton, and describe the intended relationship between transit service and densities. D. Electric Vehicle Infrastructure, Zoning Code Amendment Ordinance. (CFN-131) Ordinance No. 3976, amending Kent City Code Chapters 15.02, 15.04, 15.05 and 11.03 to allow electric vehicle infrastructure pursuant to House Bill 1481 (HB 1481) was adopted. The purpose of HB 1481 is to encourage the transition to electric vehicle use and expedite the establishment of a convenient and cost-effective electric vehicle infrastructure that such a transition necessitates. Electric vehicle infrastructure supports an electric vehicle and includes battery charging stations, rapid charging stations and battery exchange stations. This ordinance allows battery charging stations in all zoning districts as accessory uses, but limits rapid charging stations in residential zones only to those that are accessory to a general conditional use. Battery exchange stations are allowed in all commercial and industrial zones, j but only as accessory uses where gas stations are not currently allowed. The ordinance also adopts design and parking standards for charging stations. I 2 Kent City Council Minutes October 19, 2010 E. Auto Vehicle Repair in M3 Zones, Zoning Code Amendment Ordinance. (CFN-131) Ordinance No. 3977, amending Kent City Code Sections 15.04.090 and 15.04.100 to allow automobile repair, washing services and auto body work uses in the General Industrial (M3) Zoning District under limited conditions that make the parcel less suitable for exclusive industrial use, was adopted. F. Zoning Density-Rounding Calculations, Zoning Code Amendment Ordinance. (CFN-131) Ordinance No. 3978, amending Kent City Code Section 15.02.096 relating to the calculation of maximum permitted density was adopted. The amendment removes rounding as a mechanism for determining the number of lots or dwelling units when there are less than four, and raises the fraction needed to gain density for lots or dwelling units when there are four to nine. G. Animal Control Ordinance. (CFN-1319) Ordinance No. 3979, the Animal Control Ordinance that repeals Kent City Code Chapter 8.03 and adopts King County Animal Control provisions in Chapters 11.04, 11.12, 11.20, 11.24, 11.28, and 11.32, with limited exceptions and additions, was adopted. H. Panther Lake Property Lease Agreement. (CFN-118/239) The one-year lease agreement between the City of Kent and Gerald Olsen Jr. and Kristen Roen to rent one house and outbuildings, located at 11234 SE 2041h Street, for $1,200 per month, plus leasehold tax was ratified. J. 2011 Operating Budget (2"d Hearing). (CFN-186) November 2, 2010, was set for the second public hearing of the 2011 Budget at the regular City Council meeting. K. 2011-2016 Capital Improvement Plan (2"d Hearing) and Comprehensive Plan Amendments. (CFN-775) November 2, 2010, was set for the second public hearing of 2011-2016 Capital Improvement Plan at the regular City Council meeting. L. Kent Comprehensive Plan and Amendments to Kent City Code Section 12.13 School Impact Fees. (CFN-775/961/1000) November 2, 2010, was set as the date for a public hearing to consider amendment of the Capital Facilities Element of the Kent Comprehensive Plan and amendment of Chapter 12.13 Kent City Code to incorporate the updated Capital Facilities Plans of the Auburn, Kent and Federal Way School Districts, the City's 2011-2016 Capital Improvement Plan, and changes to adopted school impact fees. M. 2010 Tax Levy for 2011 Budget. (CFN-104) November 2, 2010, was set as the public hearing date on the 2010 Tax Levy for the 2011 budget at the regular City Council meeting. N. Free Communities Support Program Grant. (CFN-122) A U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Substance Abuse Mental Health Services grant in the amount of $53,453 was accepted, the Mayor was authorized to establish a budget, and expend the funds, and sign all necessary documents. 3 Kent City Council Minutes October 19, 2010 O. Washington Traffic Safety Commission Mini-Grant. (CFN-122) Funds from the Washington Traffic Safety Commission were accepted, the Mayor was authorized to establish a budget, expend the funds in accordance with the grant agreement and sign all necessary grant documents. The funds will be used to purchase equipment for the South King County Target Zero Manager to support traffic safety programs. This funding is provided on a reimbursement basis. P. Valley Narcotics Enforcement Team Interlocal Cooperative Agreement Addendum No. One. (CFN-122) The Mayor was authorized to sign Addendum No. One of the Interlocal Cooperative Agreement for the Valley Narcotics Enforcement Team. Addendum No. One adds the City of Seattle as a full member of the Team. VNET provides services for all the participating agencies, increased safety for officers and the community, and improved cost effectiveness. OTHER BUSINESS ADDED ITEM A. Green River Levees Letter. (CFN-1318) Mike Mactutis of the Public Works Department explained the background of this issue, noting that the Corps of Engineers has been investigating whether vegetation is harmful to levee safety. He said the Corps issued a statement earlier this year that all of the local variances from the National Safety Standards would be revoked in 2010, and that a final decision on that would be made by the end of October and would go into effect in April of 2011. Mactutis said that the proposed letter is a letter of support for continuing the regional framework which started in February 2009 and is supported by the local Corps office, the National Marine Fisheries Service, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the Puget Sound Partnership, and the Governor. He noted that other cities have sent letters of support. Thomas moved to authorize the Mayor and Council President to deliver the referenced letter to the Army Corps of Engineers. Ranniger seconded and the motion carried. REPORTS A. Council President. (CFN-198) Perry noted that a special workshop on the budget will be held on October 21 and said that the straight community must deal with violence against gays. B. Mayor. (CFN-198) The Mayor noted that representatives from Norway were in Kent last week, that she recently met with new Green River Community College President Dr. Ely, that she will soon meet with the new President of Renton Technical College, that the Consulate General of Mexico was in Kent today, asked for Council assistance on the Sound Transit light rail issue, noted that the State audit was recently completed, and said the final meeting of the Regional Transit Task Force is scheduled for October 21. C. Operations Committee. (CFN-198) No report was given. 4 Kent City Council Minutes October 19, 2010 D. Parks and Human Services Committee. (CFN-198) Ranniger noted that the next meeting will be held at 5:00 p.m. on October 21. E. Economic & Community Development Committee. (CFN-198) Perry noted that the next meeting will be held on November 8 and that agenda items include DCE height limits. F. Public Safety Committee. (CFN-198) Harmon noted that the next meeting will be at 5:00 p.m. on November 9. G. Public Works Committee. (CFN-198) Raplee announced that the November 1st meeting has been cancelled and that a special meeting may be called. H. Administration. (CFN-198) Hodgson noted that special workshops on the budget will be held on October 21 and October 26, that the regular Council meeting on November 2"d will begin at 5:00 p.m. with no workshop, and that there will be an executive session of approximately 15 minutes to discuss labor negotiations and receive an update on property acquisition. He added that action may be taken when the meeting reconvenes. EXECUTIVE SESSION The meeting recessed to Executive Session at 7:40 p.m. and reconvened at 8:00 p.m. ACTION AFTER EXECUTIVE SESSION A. Labor Negotiations. (CFN-147) Thomas moved to authorize the Mayor to sign a one-year union contract extension with Teamsters Local 117 effective January 1, 2011, through December 31, 2011. Raplee seconded. Albertson noted that the contract has no COLA's or furlough days. The motion carried. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 8:00 p.m. (CFN-198) Brenda Jacober, CMC City Clerk 5 IKent City Council Meeting Date November 2, 2010 Category Consent Calendar - 7C 1. SUBJECT: 4CULTURE SUSTAINED SUPPORT GRANT - ACCEPT 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Accept the Sustained Support Grant from in the amount of 17 000 4Culture for 2011 Kent Arts Commission programs $ , amend the budget, authorize expenditure of funds in accordance with the grant agreement, and authorize the Mayor to sign all necessary grant documents. 4Culture has awarded the Kent Arts Commission $17,000 in Sustained Support funding through a competitive grant process. The funding will support 2011 programs, including Spotlight Series performances, Kent Kids' Arts Day and Kent Summer Concert Series. 3. EXHIBITS: Grant contract #110135A 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Parks & Human Services Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) S5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? X Revenue? .X Currently in the Budget? Yes _ No X 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: TAgreement No. 110135A Contractor's Federal Taxpayer ID No. (last 4 digits) Contractor City of Kent Arts Commission Project Title 2010 Programs Contract Amount: $17,000.00 Fund Source: CP —Arts Sustained Support Contract Period From: 01/01/2010 To: 12/31/2010 AGENCY SERVICES CONTRACT 2010 THIS CONTRACT is entered into by the CULTURAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF KING COUNTY ("4Culture"), whose address is 101 Prefontaine Place South, Seattle, WA 98104-2672 and telephone number is (206) 296-7580 and City of Kent Arts Commission (the "Contractor"), whose address is 220 4th Ave S, Kent WA 98032 and telephone number is (253) 856-5055 Contractor is an art, cultural or historical organization or specialist qualified to receive funds pursuant to King County Code Sections 2 48 and 4.42 and RCW 67 28 180 and as hereinafter may be amended. The 4Culture Board of Directors approved providing funds for this project by Motion No. 2010-28. i 1 4Culture desires to provide funds with which the Contractor shall render certain services to King County citizens Such services are for the benefit of art museums, cultural museums, heritage museums, the arts, I and/or the performing arts and are consistant with those defined in RCW 67.28.180 ("Public Benefit Services"). 4Culture is organized pursuant to King County Ordinance 14482 and RCW 35.21.730, et seq. RCW 35 21.750 provides as follows- "[All] liabilities incurred by such public corporation, commission, or authority shall be satisfied exclusively from the assets and properties of such public corporation, commission or authority and no creditor or other person shall have any right of action against the city, town, or county creating such corporation, commission, or authority on account of any debts, obligations, or liabilities of such public corporation, commission, or authority." The legislative authority of 4Culture has found and declared that providing funds to Contractor to reimburse Project costs in consideration of services provided hereunder constitutes a public purpose with the meaning of Article VII, Section 1 of the Washington State Constitution for which public funds may properly be expended or advanced. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of payments, covenants, and agreements hereinafter mentioned, to be made and performed by the parties hereto, the parties covenant and do mutually agree as follows: i AG SVC 2010 Page 1 of 7 I. SCOPE OF SERVICES A. The Contractor shall provide services and comply with the requirements set forth hereinafter and in the following attached exhibits which are incorporated herein by reference: ® Specific Scope of Services & Reimbursement Schedule Attached hereto as Exhibit A ® Project Proposal and Budget Attached hereto as Exhibit B ® Insurance Requirements Attached hereto as Exhibit C ❑ Personnel Inventory (K C C 12 16 060A)( In combination with Attached hereto as Exhibit D other agreements, in excess of$25,000 in a calendar ear ❑ Affidavit and Certificate of Compliance (K.C.0 12.16 060B) Attached hereto as Exhibit E for A reements in excess of $25,000 ❑ Disability Assurance of Compliance/Section 504 (KCC Attached hereto as Exhibit F 12.16 060D ORGANIZATIONS ONLY 11 B. Purchase of Services. Funds awarded under this Agreement shall be used solely to reimburse the Contractor for expenses incurred expressly and solely in accordance with the Protect Proposal and Budget and/or the Specific Scope of Services attached. Any amendment or modification to the Project Proposal and Budget or the Specific Scope of Services and Payment Schedule must be approved in writing by 4Culture The work described generally by the Project Proposal and Budget and more specifically by the Specific Scope of Services shall hereinafter be referred to as the "Project". C. In addition to performing the Project, Contractor shall provide any Public Benefit Provisions that may be specified in the Specific Scope of Services attached. D. Contractor agrees to acknowledge 4Culture support with inclusion of the approved 4Culture logo in all marketing and promotional materials during the period this contract is in force: 4 Approved logos are available for download in a variety of formats at C U LTU R E http://www.4culture.org/partner/logos KIND COUNTY LODWN.TAX E. The Contractor agrees to notify 4Culture in advance of any public Project activities, including but not limited to ground breaking events, dedications, and other public programs. II. DURATION OF CONTRACT This Agreement shall commence on January 1, 2010 and shall terminate on December 31, 2010. This Agreement, however, may be terminated earlier as provided in Section IV hereof Ill. COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT j A. 4Culture shall reimburse the Contractor for its actual and authorized expenditures incurred in satisfactorily completing the Specific Scope of Services attached and otherwise fulfilling all requirements specified in this contract in an aggregate amount not to exceed $17,000.00. AG SVC 2010 Page 2 of 7 ) LB. Contractor may apply to 4Culture for reimbursement upon completion of specified phases as detailed in the Specific Scope of Services and Reimbursement Schedule attached to this contract. C. Contractor shall submit an invoice and all accompanying reports in the forms attached hereto as "EXHIBITS", not more than 30 days after the completion of each specified phase identified in the Specific Scope of Services and Reimbursement Schedule 4Culture will initiate authorization for payment after approval of corrected invoices and reports. 4Culture shall make payment to the Agency not more than 60 days after the appropriate invoice is received. D. Contractor shall submit its final invoice and all outstanding reports within 30 days of the date this Agreement terminates. If the Agency's final invoice and reports are not submitted by the day specified in this subsection, 4Culture will be relieved of all liability for payment to the Agency of the amounts set forth in said invoice or any subsequent invoice E. Accompanying the final invoice for the project, the Contractor shall also submit: 1. A project evaluation report upon the form provided by 4Culture. 2. If 4Culture requests, at least two images (prints, slides, or digital images accompanied by a high-quality print-out) of publishable quality for use by 4Culture to publicize its funding programs. Photos shall have credits, caption information, and permission to publish. F If the Contractor fails to comply with any terms or conditions of this contract or to provide in any manner the work or services agreed to herein, 4Culture may withhold any payment to the Contractor until 4Culture is satisfied that corrective action, as specified by 4Culture, has been completed This right is in addition to and not in lieu of 4Culture's right to terminate this contract as provided in Section IV, any other rights of4Culture under this Agreement and any other right or remedy available to4Culture at law or in equity. IV. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT A. If, through any cause, the Contractor shall fail to fulfill in a timely and proper manner its obligations under this Agreement or if the Contractor shall violate any of its covenants, agreements or stipulations of this Agreement, 4Culture may terminate this Agreement and withhold the remaining allocation Prior to so terminating this Agreement, 4Culture shall submit written notice to the Contractor describing such default or violation 4Culture shall not so terminate this Agreement if 4Culture determines that Contractor has, within twenty (20) days of the date of such notice, fully corrected such default or violation. V. MAINTENANCE OF RECORDS A. The Contractor shall maintain accounts and records, including personnel, property, financial, and programmatic records and other such records as may be deemed necessary by 4Culture to ensure proper accounting for all contract funds and compliance with this Agreement All such records shall I sufficiently and properly reflect all direct and indirect costs of any nature expended and services provided in the performance of this Agreement. B. These records shall be maintained for a period of six (6) years after termination of this Agreement unless a longer retention period is required by law. AG SVC 2010 Page 3 of 7 VI. AUDITS AND EVALUATIONS A. The records and documents with respect to all matters covered by this Agreement shall be subject at all times to inspection, review or audit by 4Culture and/or federal/state officials so authorized by law during the performance of this Agreement and six (6) years after termination hereof. B. The Contractor shall provide right of access to its facilities, including by any subcontractor to 4Culture, the King County, state and/or federal agencies or officials at all reasonable times in order to monitor and evaluate the services provided under this Agreement 4Culture will give advance notice to the Contractor in the case of fiscal audits to be conducted by 4Culture C. The Contractor agrees to cooperate with 4Culture in the evaluation of the Contractor's performance under this contract and to make available all information reasonably required by any such evaluation process. The results and records of said evaluations shall be maintained and disclosed in accordance with RCW Chapter 42.17 (Public Records Act). VIL PROPRIETARY RIGHTS If any patentable or copyrightable material or article should result from the Project, all rights accruing from such material or article shall be the sole property of Contractor Contractor agrees to and does hereby grant to 4Culture, an irrevocable, nonexclusive, and royalty-free license to use, according to law, any material or article and use any method that may be developed as part of the work under this Agreement. The foregoing license shall not apply to existing training materials, consulting aids, checklists, and other materials and documents of Contractor which are modified for use in the performance of this Agreement. Vill. FUTURE SUPPORT 4Culture makes no commitment to support the services contracted for herein nor guarantee regarding the success of the services and assumes no obligation for future support of the Project except as expressly set forth in this Agreement. IX. HOLD HARMLESS AND INDEMNIFICATION A. In providing services under this Agreement, the Contractor is an independent contractor, and shall determine the means of accomplishing the results contemplated by this Agreement Neither the Contractor nor its officers, agents or employees are employees of 4Culture for any purpose. The Contractor shall comply with all applicable federal and state laws and regulations regarding employment, minimum wages and hours, and discrimination in employment. The Contractor is responsible for determining the compensation of its employees, for payment of such compensation, and for all federal and/or state tax, industrial insurance, and Social Security liability that may result from the performance of and compensation for these services The Contractor and its officers, agents, and employees shall make no claim of career service or civil service rights which may accrue to a 4Culture employee under state or local law. 4Culture assumes no responsibility for the payment of any compensation, wages, benefits, or taxes by, or on behalf of the Contractor, its employees and/or others by reason of this Agreement. To the extent allowed by law, the Contractor shall protect, defend, indemnify and save harmless 4Culture and its officers, agents, and employees from and against any and all claims, costs, and/or losses whatsoever occurring or resulting from (1) the Contractor's failure to pay any such compensation, wages, benefits, or taxes; (2) the supplying to the Contractor of work, services, materials, or supplies by Contractor employees or other suppliers in connection with or support of the performance of this Agreement. The Contractor shall also defend, indemnify, and save harmless 4Culture, and its officers, agents, and employees, from and against any and all claims made by Contractor's employees arising from their employment with Contractor. AG SVC 2010 Page 4 of 7 i B. To the full extent provided by applicable law, the Contractor shall protect, defend, indemnify, and save harmless 4Culture its officers, employees, and agents from any and all costs, claims, judgments, and/or awards of damages, arising out of or in any way resulting from the acts or omissions of the Contractor, its officers, employees, and/or agents, except to the extent resulting from 4Culture's sole negligence If this Agreement is a "a covenant, promise, agreement or understanding in, or in connection with or collateral to, a contract or agreement relative to the construction, alteration, repair, addition to, subtraction from, improvement to, or maintenance of, any building, highway, road, railroad, excavation, or other structure, project, development, or improvement attached to real estate" within the meaning of RCW 4.24.225, the Contractor shall so protect, defend, indemnify, and save harmless 4Culture, its officers, employees, and agents only to the extent of the Contractor's, its officers', employees', and/or agents' negligence. The Contractor agrees that its obligations under this subparagraph extend to any claim, demand, and/or cause of action brought by or on behalf of any employees, or agents. In the event 4Culture incurs any judgment, award and/or cost arising there from including attorneys' fees to enforce the provisions of this article, all such fees, expenses, and costs shall be recoverable from the Contractor. Claims shall include, but are not limited to, assertions that the use or transfer of any software, book, document, report, film, tape or sound reproduction or material of any kind, delivered hereunder, constitutes an infringement of any copyright. X. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS The Contractor shall procure and maintain for the duration of this Agreement insurance as described on the Exhibit labeled as Insurance Requirements attached here to. XI. CONFLICT OF INTEREST Chapter 42.23 RCW (Code Of Ethics For Municipal Officers--Contract Interests) is incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein and the Contractor agrees to abide by all the conditions of said Chapter Failure by the Contractor to comply with any requirements of such Chapter shall be a material breach of contract. In addition, Contractor represents, warrants and covenants that no officer, employee, or agent of 4Culture who exercises any functions or responsibilities in connection with the planning and implementation of the Specific Scope of Contract Services funded herein, has or shall have any beneficial interest, directly or indirectly, in this contract. The Contractor further represents, warrants and covenants nei+her it nor any other person beneficially interested in this Agreement has offered to give or given any 1- such officer, employee, or agent of 4Culture, directly or indirectly, any compensation, gratuity or reward in connection with this Agreement. The Contractor shall take all appropriate steps to assure compliance with this provision. AG SVC 2010 Page 5 of 7 XVI. SURVIVAL The terms and conditions of Sections III, V, VI, VII, Vill, IX, XI, XII, XIII, XIV and XV shall survive the termination of this Agreement and shall be continuing obligations of the parties. 4CULTURE: CONTRACTOR: 4Culture-CDA Executive Director Signature Date Name (Please type or print) Title (Please type or print) Date AG SVC 2010 Page 7 of 7 Exhibit A SCOPE OF SERVICE City of Kent Arts Commission and 4Culture, the Cultural Development Authority of King County, mutually agree that the following services be provided in accordance with the application and contract work sheet submitted to and approved by the 4Culture Board of Directors. Support for 2010 Programs, including the Spotlight Series (10 performances between Jan and May; three between Oct and Dec), Kent Kids'Arts Day (March 6) and Kent's Summer Concert series (17 performances July-Aug). Events are open and publicized to the community. AMOUNT $17,000.00 For artist fees and program expenses. Payable upon completion, submittal of invoice and documentation regarding: • Final budget, actual • Completion of evaluation form • Final report of program activities • Programs, brochures, flyers if available PUBLIC BENEFIT Programs are accessible to a broad range of King County residents. All events are open and publicized to the community. Approximately 1,200 free tickets to Kent Kids' Arts Day distributed to economically disadvantaged families. Summer arts activities are provided free of charge, including 17 summer concerts. Complimentary and discounted tickets for many performances are distributed by local social service agencies; these tickets reach seniors„ teens, disabled citizens and ethnically diverse groups. Public and school lectures, workshops and other outreach activities are offered for free or very low cost in conjunction with performances. Scholarships for classes and residency activities are available. PUBLICITY/PROMOTION POLICY Prominent acknowledgment of 4Culture/ King County Lodging Tax Fund is required of all recipients for use in all publicity and promotional materials, including, but not limited to brochures, press releases, programs, posters, public service announcements, flyers and advertisements. Please contact your 4Culture contract administrator or go to http•//4culture oraa/partner/index htm to download the appropriate logo credit. '� Final payment will not be made until acknowledgment is submitted on printed material XII. NONDISCRIMINATION During the performance of this Agreement, Contractor shall comply with state, federal and local legislation requiring nondiscrimination in employment and the provision of services to the public, including, but not limited to: Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, chapter 49 60 RCW (the Washington state law against discrimination); K.C.C. chapter 12 16 regarding discrimination and affirmative action in employment by contractors, subcontractors and vendors, K.C.C. chapter 12.17 prohibiting discrimination in contracting; KC C chapter 12.18 requiring fair employment practices; K.C.C. chapter and 12 22 prohibiting discrimination in places of public accommodation �I The Contractor shall maintain, until 12 months after completion of all work under this contract, all written quotes, bids, estimates or proposals submitted to the Contractor by all businesses seeking to participate in this Agreement. The Contractor shall make such documents available to 4Culture for inspection and copying upon request. XIII. NOTICES Whenever this Agreement provides for notice to be provided by one party to another, such notice shall be in writing and directed to the chief executive officer of Contractor and the Executive Director of 4Culture at the addresses first written above Any time within which a party must take some action shall be computed from the date that the notice is received by said party. XIV. GENERAL PROVISIONS No modification or amendment to this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and signed by the parties hereto. Proposed changes which are mutually agreed upon shall be incorporated by written amendments to this Agreement. 4Culture's failure to insist upon the strict performance of any provision of this Agreement or to exercise any right based upon a breach thereof or the acceptance of any performance during such breach, shall not constitute a waiver of any right under this Agreement In the event any term or condition of this Agreement or application thereof to any person or circumstances is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other terms, conditions, or applications of this Agreement which can be given effect without the invalid term, condition, or application. To this end, the terms and conditions of this Agreement are declared severable. The parties agree that this Agreement is the complete expression of the terms hereto and any oral or written representations or understandings not incorporated herein are excluded Both parties recognize that time is of the essence in the performance of the provisions of this Agreement XV. ATTORNEYS' FEES: EXPENSES Contractor agrees to pay upon demand all of 4Culture's costs and expenses, including attorneys' fees and 4Culture's legal expenses, incurred in connection with the enforcement of this Agreement 4Culture may pay someone else to help enforce this Agreement, and Contractor shall pay the costs and expenses of such enforcement. Costs and expenses include 4Culture's attorneys' fees and legal expenses whether or not there is a lawsuit, including attorneys'fees and legal expenses for bankruptcy proceedings (and including efforts to modify or vacate any automatic stay or injunction), appeals, and any anticipated post-judgment collection services Contractor also shall pay all court costs and such additional fees as may be directed by the court. AG SVC 2010 Page 6 of 7 trts Sustained Support 2010 EXHIBIT Ity of Kent Arts Commission ddress Website 20 4th Ave S www kentarts.com ent Washington Email 98032 rMllerbeck(a)ci kent wa us hone King County Council District # 253) 856-5050 9 ax WA State Legislative District # 253) 856-6050 33, 47 Date Incorporated 10/20/1975 Federal Tax ID 91-6001254 WA State UBI# C-173-000-002 f9evenue last fiscal year $1,089,803 Revenue 2nd to last fiscal year 1,092,215 Organization Director ~Cultural Programs Manager, Ms. Ronda Billerbeck Director Email Ii-billerbeck@ci.kent.wa.us Director Phone (253) 856-5055 Organization Description Local arts agency serving Kent and Kent School District service area. Staffed and primarily funded by the City of Kent. Mission To provide leadership in establishing cultural opportunities and arts education, to improve the quality of life and enhance the aesthetic environment and to promote Kent as a center for great arts. How do you define your community? (Consider audiences, content producers, and supporters/volunteers.) On the broadest level, our community consists of the diverse population of the City of Kent and the Kent School District service area - approximately 120,000 people. We are committed to providing access for all citizens to quality arts -experiences. 2008 attendance at our programs totaled more than 135,000. Our audience characteristics vary and reflect the community's diverse ages, ethnicities and economic statuses. Ethnic minorities make up 30% of Kent's population. We 1 have made progress in developing multicultural audiences by presenting ethnic art forms and engaging in grass roots promotions. Over 40% of Kent residents are considered low income and we employ a variety of efforts to increase participation from these residents, including free outreach activities and admission vouchers. In addition to our own programs, we provide support and funding for local arts groups. Approximately $10,000 is awarded to five or six organizations annually, to support projects ranging from musical theater and chorale performances to a youth poetry program and activities for senior citizens and developmentally disabled populations. The Kent Arts Commission, which I file:///Rl/...SO/City%20of%20Kent%20Arts%20Commission/Cty%20of%20Kent%20Arts%20Commission_0003_fieldData.html[i/25/2010 2:36:43 PM] consists of 12 mayor-appointed volunteers, advises and assists staff on an on-going basis. Volunteers of all ages also contribute approximately 650 hours annually to our programs. What have been your organization's most significant programmatic accomplishments in the last two years? The past two years have been filled with accomplishments around acclaimed Bauhaus artist Herbert Bayer's Earthworks at Mill Creek Canyon. A celebration in September 2007 drew 300 people to celebrate the 25th anniversary of the piece. In October 2007, staff led a tour featuring the Earthwork as part of the International Sculpture Center Conference in Seattle. In April 2008, the King County Landmarks Commission, acting for the City of Kent, designated Mill Creek Canyon Earthworks a City of Kent Historic Landmark. In June 2009, staff organized a tour as part of the national Americans for the Arts Convention. Significant progress has been made in the restoration and promotion of the Earthworks. A 4Culture Historic Preservation Challenge Grant is providing funds to regrade the double-ring pond; remove invasive plants and replace with native plant species; and increase the height of the cone atop the dam. "A Place for People," documentary of the Earthworks was completed and is available for viewing online, along with other Earthworks research materials. Additionally, we have posted our entire public art collection online using a dynamic map with a roll-over feature that links images to detailed descriptions. Our performing arts program has also flourished. Spotlight Series draws approximately 4,000 people to experience a variety of performing arts events annually. The 2008-2009 series featured 16 performances and set new attendance records. The "Spotlight on Arts" program brought Irve performance to 1,000 people in educational settings. Additionally, 20 outdoor concerts are presented each year as part of our free Summer Concert Series, which draws 7,000 people. We continue to see success in our programs for children and families, including strong participation in youth theater residencies and the annual Kent Kids'Arts Day and Student Art Exhibit events. What have been your organization's most significant administrative accomplishments in the last two years? A significant management accomplishment was launching a new ticketing system in '07-'08. Ticket Turtle allows customers to purchase tickets online (online sales have accounted for 46% of transactions in the 1st two years.) The system also allows us to sell assigned seats, a feature patrons had been requesting. We revitalized our Summer Art Exhibit. When Canterbury Faire was discontinued in '06, the exhibit moved to a new date and location in conjunction with Cornucopia Days. We saw decreased participation by artists and attendance in the first two years Staff worked closely with a committee in '08 to plan the call to artists, procure a sponsor, increase promotions and coordinate the event. The result was increased participation, attendance and positive feedback from artists and the public. Collaborations to incorporate the arts in downtown are another accomplishment. "Wednesday Picnic Performances"for kids were moved to a downtown location in '08 resulting in increased attendance and positive feedback from artists, audiences and merchants. Our Student Art Exhibit includes a full evening of youth arts that draws 650+ people downtown, thanks to a collaboration with Kent Downtown Partnership. KDP also funded four bike racks by Kristin Tollefson that are now part of our art collection. We also continued our successful partnership with the Kent Lions, uniting efforts and maximizing available funding to bring arts activities to the popular annual Cornucopia Days festival in downtown Kent. What do you hope to accomplish in the next two years and what are your challenges? We will implement the 2009-2011 City Art Plan, including installation of a major artwork by artist Elizabeth Conner at Town Square Plaza. A key Earthworks Cultural Tourism initiative will allow us to promote our City's cultural heritage through new and existing partnerships, We continue to work with other agencies to create and fund a management plan, restoration projects and interpretive materials. We installed and dedicated a new Danny Pierce Mural in downtown Kent In July 2009. Staff is collaborating with the Kent Historical Society, the Kent School District and the Parks Foundation to add website content and additional murals. This coming September, a career retrospective at the Centennial Center Gallery will celebrate Danny's 90th birthday, Regional organizations including the Wenatchee Valley Museum &Cultural Center are active partners. We will build on the success of the Cultural Programs Division's Spotlight Series of performing arts events, ensuring high quality and a balance of genres. Ethnic diversity and youth programs remain high priorities. Continuing our sponsorship program will allow us to expand potential for higher profile artists. This revenue will be more important than ever as we face significant budget reductions in 2010. le:///Rl/...10/City%20of%20Kent%20Arts%20Commission/City%20of%20Kent%20Arts%20Commission_0003_fieldData.htrnl[1/25/2010 2:36:43 PM] udget reductions are our biggest challenge as we move forward into 2010. We recently eliminated one full time staff person in the Cultural Programs division, cut a number of related programs and are implementing 10-15% reductions in any remaining programs. At the same time, increases to event production costs are outpacing growth in revenue eneratmg opportunities. Providing necessary stewardship and maintenance of the City's art collection with limited resources is an ongoing challenge. Reduction of funding has diminished capacity for incorporating art into current and tuture capital pro3ects and conducting necessary maintenance on the existing collection. Lack of available, affordable and echnically well-equipped performance space continues to be a challenge as we rely on school facilities to house our rowing performing arts program. file:///Rj/...10/City%20of o2OKent%2OArts%2CCommission/City°/a20of%2DKent%2OArts%2OCommission_0003_fieldoata.html[l/25/2010 2:36:43 PM] - i FINANCIAL and PERSONNEL I Name of Organization City of Kent Arts Commission Fiscal Year Ends Dec 31 (monthlday) ACTUAL CURRENT NEXT YEAR FINANCIAL FY2008.09 FY2009-10 FY2010.11 1 Arts Program Expenses: 2 Personnel _ 3 Artistic permanent 0 0 0 4 temporary 261,747 211,263 190,921 5 Production permanent o 0 0 6 temporary 33,544 24,665 21,074 7 Administrative permanent 448,642 476,387 372,738 8 temporary 12,348 15,414 15,414 9 Education permanent 0 0 o 10 temporary 0 0 0 11 ProductiontExhibitlon expenses 39,711 40,397 41,897 12 Marketing/Promotion expenses 116,967 112,413 84,315 13 Fundraising expenses 0 0 0 14 Education expenses 5,219 7,723 6,223 15 Occupancy expenses(mortgage/rent/utilities) 17,230 25,922 20,922 16 Adnunestrative expenses 139,808 160,320 136,251 17 Subtotal 1,075,21b 1,a74,514 gt3,755 18 In-Kind expenses(must=Inklnd contributions) 16,999 15,299 15,500 19 TOTAL ART PROGRAM EXPENSES 1,092,215 1,069,803 9II5,255 20 Revenue Sources(Earned): 21 Box OfficalAdmission 75,548 52,229 52,229 22 Tuition/Workshops 29,194 17,883 17,883 23 Sales/Concessions/Rentals 15,874 12,500 12,500 24 Interest&Earnings(savings,reserves,etc) 0 0 0 25 Other Earned Income o 0 0 26 TOTAL EARNED REVENUE 120,616 I 82,612 92,612 27 Revenue Sources(Contributed): ' 28 Federal Government 0 0 0 29 Slate Government 6,750 6,750 6,000 30 4Culture 9,250 17,000 0 31 City Government 907,097 949,459 765,585 32 Corporations 22,625 11,663 11,683 33 Foundations 2,500 5,000 1,875 34 Individuals 6,378 2,000 2,000 35 Fundraising Events(ONet or OGross income?) 0 7 0 36 Misc.contnbubons 0 0 0 37 SUBTOTAL CONTRIBUTED INCOME 954,690 991,892 801,143 38 In-Kind Contributions 16,999 15,299 15,500 39 GRAND TOTAL INCOME 1,392,215 1,Q$5,8Q3 90$1 Z55 NUMBER OF PERSONNEL 41 #of Artistic permanent 0 42 temporary 200 43 #of Production permanent 0 44 temporary 3 45 #of Administrative permanent 4 46 temporary 2 47 #of Education permanent 0 48 temporary 0 4Culture Local Arts Agencies Arts Sustained Support 2010 Supplementary Info Form 1 i NOTES Name of Organization City of Kent Arts Commsion Fiscal Year Ends Dec 31 If more room is needed, copy this form and attach additional sheets. Line Item / Year Note 4 2009 4 2010 Decreases in temporary artistic personnel reflect program cuts and reduced artistic fees due to City budget deficits. 6 2009 6 2010 Decreases in temporary production personnel reflect program cuts due to City budget deficits. 7 2010 22%decrease in permanent administrative personnel due to elimination of one full time position. 12 2010 Reduction in marketing budget due to program cuts. 16 2010 15%decrease in administrative expenses due to elimination of one staff person and several programs. 21 2009 30+% drop in box office admission and tuition/workshops is due to the 2008 figures 22 2009 being "actuals" and 2009 figures being "budget" amounts. We will bring in approximately the same amount in these two revenue lines in 2009 as in 2008, 31 2010 The 17% decrease in City Government support reflects the loss of one full time staff person 32 2009 48% drop in corporate support is due to the 2008 figure being"actual'and the 2009 figure being "budget'amounts. We will bring in more corporate revenue in 2009 than is budgeted, but our budget amount reflects expected decreases in 2010. 4Culture Local Arts Agencies Arts Sustained Support 2010 Supplementary Info Form Page 2 LAA NAME. City of Kent Arts Commission YEAR ENDING: 12/31/08 Events -Programs-Services,List you?primary activities for the most recently completed year _:�.-�---- - - .�_ -=— --- ---__,—. _ ,--=------ -------�_-_-------�-----,emu..,--- - 1---- ----._- -�------ SPOTLIGHT SERIES PERFORMANCES Tap Kids 1111/2008,244 attended Chicago Blues Reunion 1/18/08,155 attended Moscow Circus 2/14108,479 attended An Evening with Groucho/Frank Ferrante 3/6/08, 174 attended Ladies of Slack Key Guitar 3/15/08,165 attended Dallas Children's Theater"If You Give a Pig a Party" 4/12108,414 attended Debashish Bhattacharya 4/19/08,55 attended The Capitol Steps 9121/08,314 attended East Village Opera Company 9/28/08,76 attended Gaelic Storm 10/11108,366 attended Champions of the Dance 10/21108,227 attended Chic Gamine 10124108,60 attended Magical Strings 12/7108,320 attended Sister's Christmas Catechism 12112/08,473 attended SPOTLIGHT SERIES OUTREACH Debashish Bhattacharya school workshops 4/19/08,two workshops,35 youth Youth Theater Residencies March 08 and July 08, 1,108 youth Summer Concert Series July-Aug 08,20 concerts,7,700 attended FESTIVALS WITH ART COMPONENTS Kent Kids'Arts Day 311/2008, 1,500 attended Kent's Fourth of July Splash 714108, 15,000 attended Cornucopia Days 7/11-13108, 100,000 attended Kent Parks Halloween Party 1027103,750 attended VISUAL ART EXHIBITS Kent Student Art Exhibit 3/10-21/08,2,D00+attended Centennial Center Gallery Exhibits 5,000+attended OTHER Grants to artists and organizations Six organizations funded,3,970 attended protects Public art on-going development and maintenance E-news updates 4Culture Local Arts Agencies Arts Sustained Support 2010 Supplementary Info Form Page 3 LAA NAME: City of Kent Arts Commission YEAR ENDING: 12131/09 Please list your counc lo illcommission members Wus- - NAM j E OCCUPATION--'-z LEN T ,W§E Vic Jack Becvar Retired from Boeinq Linda Denny Retired Kent teacher IS years Bayard Dubois Dentist 12 years Susan Machler AttorneH 3 years Linda Mackintosh Real estate 4 years Sherri Ourada Boeing, Program Manager 10 years Dana Ralph Owner, Medical billing service 4 years Charlene Shaw Administrative assistant 10 years Marc!Wainhousle Business owner 1 2 years IGreq orthing Retired Kent teacher 1' 13 years 4Culture Local Arts Agencies Arts Sustained Support 2010 Supplementary Info Form Page 4 EXHIBIT C INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS Contractor shall procure, at its sole cost and expense, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from, or in connection with the performance of work hereunder by the Contractor, his agents, representatives, employees, and/or subcontractors. The costs of such insurance shall be paid by the Contractor or subcontractors. For All Coverages: Each insurance policy shall be written on an "Occurrence"form. 1. Minimum Scope of Insurance needed for this contract is as follows: ® Commercial General Insurance Services Office form number(CG 00 01 Ed 11-88)--Minimum Liability Combined Single Limit of$1,000,000 BI & PD with a General Aggregate er ro ect Automobile Liability Covering all owned and non-owned and hired automobiles—Combined Sin le Limit of$1,000,000 BI & PD 2. Deductibles and Self Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to, and approved by, 4Culture. The deductible and/or self-insured retention of the policies shall not apply to the Contractor's liability to 4Culture and shall be the sole responsibility of the Contractor 3. Other Insurance Provisions A. The insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: (a) General Liability Policies (1) 4Culture, its officers, employees and agents are to be covered as primary additional insureds as respects liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Contractor in connection with this Agreement. (2) To the extent of the Contractor's negligence,the Contractor's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects 4Culture, its officers, employees, and agents Any insurance and/or self-insurance maintained by 4Culture, its officers, employees, or agents shall not contribute with the Contractor's insurance or benefit the Contractor in any way. (3) The Contractor's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made and/or lawsuit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability (b) All Policies (1) Coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled, reduced in coverage or in limits, except as reduced in aggregate by paid claims, at any point during the life of this contract. No material change, or cancellation or AN nonrenewal of any policy required by this contract shall occur without thirty (30)days' prior written notice to 4Culture. 4. Acceptability of Insurers Unless otherwise approved in writing by 4Culture, insurance is to be placed with insurers with a Best's rating of no less than A:VIII, or, if not rated with Best's,with minimum surpluses the equivalent of Bests' surplus size VIII. 5. Verification of Coverage , 4Culture, reserves the right to request that contractor submit the certificate(s)of insurance evidencing compliance with all requirements set forth above. Kent City Council Meeting Date November 2, 2010 Category Consent Calendar - 7D 1. SUBJECT: 2011 WASHINGTON STATE ARTS COMMISSION ORGANIZATIONAL SUPPORT GRANT - ACCEPT 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Accept the Washington State Arts Organizational Support Grant to the Kent Arts Commission in the amount of $4,380, amend the ' budget, authorize the expenditure of funds in accordance with the grant agreement and authorize the Mayor to sign all necessary grant documents. ' Washington State Arts Commission (WSAC) has awarded the Kent Arts Commission a general operating support grant. This grant is for the second year of the 2010-2011 funding cycle. Kent Arts Commission will use the funding to support the presentation of arts and cultural activities such Spotlight Series and Summer Concerts. 3. EXHIBITS: Grant contract #2011136 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Parks & Human Services Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) ' 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? X Revenue? X Currently in the Budget? Yes No X 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: !j Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: i � 1 WASHINGTON STATE ARTS COMMISSION ' Program: Midsized Arts Organization Program FY2011 Contract No.2011136 GRANT CONTRACT THIS CONTRACT is made and entered into by and between the WASHINGTON STATE ARTS ' COMMISSION,111 Capitol Way S,Suite 600,PO Box 42675,Olympia,WA 98504-2675 hereinafter referred to as the COMMISSION, and i Name: Kent Arts Commission Physical 220 4th_Ave,South Address Kent WA 98032.-5895 Mailing 220 4th Ave South Address Kent WA 98032-583.8 Phone No (253) 856-5050 Web Site www.kentarts.com Washington State UBI No 173 000 002 Fedetal Employee Id No 91-6001254 Social SecuntyNumber N/A ' hereinafter referred to as the CONTRACTOR. ' THE PARTIES MUTUALLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE AS FOLLOWS: A. PURPOSE OF CONTRACT This Contract sets out the terms and conditions by which the COMMISSION awards a grant to the ' CONTRACTOR for the purpose of developing,sponsoring,promoting or administering an activity,project or program which is related to the growth and development of the arts and humanities in the State of Washington RCW 43.46 provides the statutory authorization for making the grant The funding is administered under WAC Title 30. B DESCRIPTION OF THE ACTIVITY,PROJECT,OR PROGRAM CONTRACTOR shall use funds awarded under this Contract No. 2011136 solely for the grant proposal ' funded through the Midsized Arts Organization Program for FY2011 as described in Attachment A: Scope of Work i C. AMOUNT OF GRANT 1 The Commission awards State Funds in the amount of ZERO AND 00/100 Dollars ($0.00)to the CONTRACTOR 2. The Commission awards Federal Funds in the amount of FOUR THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED EIGHTYAND 00/100 Dollars ($4,380.00)to the CONTRACTOR Applicable only if Contract includes Federal Funds: ' Federal Catalog of Domestic Assistance No 45 025 Federal Gant No 10-6100-2024 3. The Commission awards private funds in the amount of ZERO AND 00/100 Dollars ($0.00)to the ' CONTRACTOR Grant Contract No 2011136 1 of 3 i� 4. CONTRACTOR agrees to provide matching funds equal to or greater than the total funds provided by the ' COMMISSION 5. Payments will be made in accordance with the payment schedule set forth in Attachment B. D CONTRACT PERIOD ' Funds are awarded for the period beginning July 1, 2010 to June 30,2011. The CONTRACTOR must expend all funds by the ending date of this contract Funds not expended by the ending date of this contract shall lapse unless an extension is requested in writing by the CONTRACTOR and approved m wrrtmg by the COMMISSION The CONTRACTOR shall notify the COMMISSION immediately upon knowledge that any portion of the funds will not be expended by the end of the fiscal year. i E. CONTRACT REPRESENTATIVES The following shall be the contact persons for all communications and billings regarding the performance of this Contract Either party shall provide written notification to the other of changes in contract representation CONTRACTOR's Contract Representative: COMMISSION's Contract Representative Name Ronda Billerbeck Name Christet Ratliff ' and Title "" """""" "".""" and Title Cultural Programs"Manager Administrative Assistant org City of Kent Arts.Commission Org Washington State Arts Commission— m ' Name .... Name Grants to Organizations Address, 220 4th" Ave South, Address- PO Box 42675 Kent,WA,98032-5838 Olympia,WA 98504-2675 Phone (253) 856-5055 ext- Phone (360)586-0026 Fax (253)856-6050 Fax (360)586-5351 ' E-Matt rbillerbeek a,ci.kent.wa.us E-Mail christelr arts.wa. ov F. LIMITATION OF AUTHORITY The COMMISSION's Agent shall be the Executive Director of the Washington State Arts Commission. Only the COMMISSION's Agent shall have the express,implied,or apparent authority to alter, amend,modify,or waive any clause or condition of this contract.The Agent may delegate this authority,but such delegation is effective only if in writing.See General Terms and Conditions for Contract Amendment or Modification ' procedures. G. RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS ' All rights and obligations of the parties to this Contract shall be subject to this Contract and its attachments including the following,which by this reference,are made a part of this Contract- Attachment A: Scope of Work ' Attachment B: Payment Schedule Attachment C' General Terms and Conditions Attachment Voucher ' Attachment E' Final Report Requirements lfnal report materials"available at"www arts wa eov) Attachment F: National Endowment for the Arts General Terms and Conditions (deleted if Contract does not include federal funds) i Giant Contract No 2011136 2 of 3 i H INSURANCE Automobile Liability In the event that services delivered pursuant to this contract involve the use of vehicles, ' either owned or unowned by the CONTRACTOR,the CONTRACTOR shall require the owner or driver of the automobile to provide automobile liability insurance. The minimum limit for automobile liability is $100,000/$300,000 bodily injury and$100,000 property damage I. ENTIRE CONTRACT This Contract including all attachments contains all the terms and conditions agreed upon by the parties No other understandings,oral or otherwise,regarding the subject matter of this contract and attachments shall be deemed to exist or to bind any of the parties J. FINAL REPORT ' The CONTRACTOR shall provide a final report to the COMMISSION within 30 days following the Contract Period ending date, submitted according to the forms and format identified in ATTACHMENT E K. MODIFICATIONS TO GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS ' NA THIS CONTRACT,,;executed by the persons signing below who warrant that they have authority to execute this contract. 3ignaKetrts Commission WASHINGTON STATE ARTS COMMISSION ire o arty aitthortz d to sign o ONTRACTOR) Kris Tucker,Executive Director �1Ja �na Date. ' (printed name ofstgnato D�r t�}or a� Par1K 2�-�.tr�. � �►,M�..., 5cxv��f (printed title ofsignatory) Date: 2-Z/�• APPROVED AS TO FORM (Signature of Susan Thomsen,Assistant Attorney General,State of Washington,March,2003 on file in fiscal office) 1 Giant Contract No 2011136 3 of 3 GRANT CONTRACT-ATTACHMENT"A" Scope of Work Program: Midsized Arts Organization Contract No.2011136 CONTRACTOR: Kent Arts Commission , 1. The CONTRACTOR agrees that funds shall be received solely for the services and/or reimbursements ' described here below: Midsized Arts Organizations Program assistance with: ' General Operating Support Event Announcement and Documentation: ' The CONTRACTOR must provide to Grants to Organizations of the COMMISSION, any public announcement,press release, or other direct mail announcement of the event(s) funded under this contract. The CONTRACTOR will mail such public announcements to. Grants to Organizations Washington State Arts Commission ' PO Box 42675 Olympia,WA 98504-2675. Final Reports are due. Every grant recipient must submit a Final Report to the Washington State Arts Commission's Grants to Organizations, 30 days following the contract ending date, this is a contractual obligation for the grant. ' The completed form must be received by the Washington State Arts Commission(WSAC), Grants to Organizations, by 5:00 P. M., August 1, 2011 The Final Report Form should be downloaded from the COMMISSION website at www.arts.wa.gov,under Grants to Organizations. ' Final Report Penalty: Grant recipients that do not submit Final Reports by the August 1,2011 deadline will have a 10%penalty deducted from any future grant from Grants to Organizations. Logo Credit: , WASH INGTON STATE' I Recipients of grants and programs are asked to credit ARTS C 0 M M I S S 10 N I WSAC in promotional communications about the grant. The WSAC logo may be downloaded from the website: www.arts wa gov If your grant includes federal funding(which would be stated N A T 1 O N A L on page I of your contract), you are also obligated to credit the National Endowment for the ENDOWMENT Arts (NEA)in the same manner as WSAC NEA logos are downloadable at www arts gov. FOR THE ARTS ' ' GRANT CONTRACT-ATTACHMENT"B" Payment Schedule Program: Grants to Organizations Midsized Arts Organization Program Contract No.2011136 CONTRACTOR: Kent Arts Commission The CONTRACTOR agrees that funds as awarded in section(1)of the CONTRACT and in consideration of section (2)of the CONTRACT,will be paid to the CONTRACTOR by the COMMISSION in consideration of the following terms and conditions: I. No funds will be paid to the CONTRACTOR in advance of the contract starting date stated in section(1) of the CONTRACT. 2. Payments will be made after the expenses for which COMMISSION funds were committed have been incurred 3. All requests for payment shall be on the form of voucher set forth in Attachment D. 4 You have the option of obtaining your grant payments via direct deposit through the Office of Financial Management(OFM). The necessary forms are downloadable from www arts wa eov under the link Grant Payments 5, The COMMISSION will make payment to the CONTRACTOR within 20 business days of receipt of a properly completed invoice,which shall include documentation of authorized expenses. 6. The invoice voucher must be signed in blue ink. The schedule for payment is as follows: Month/Year Amount ' November 2010 $45380.00 TOTAL AWARD $4,380.00 GRANT CONTRACT-ATTACHMENT"D" Invoice Voucher , FORM STATE OF WASHINGTON AGENCYUSEONLY,- - 04- A19-1A AFRS AGENCY NO LOCATION CODE "' P R OR AUTH NO(REV 7196) INVOICE VOUCHER 387 001 ' AGENCY'NAMEAND LOCATION d - INSTRUCTION TO VENDOR OR CLAIMANT Submit this form to claim payment for matenals, _',.s- °,F= _ - merchandise orsernces Show complete detail for each Item WASHINGTON STATE ARTS COMMISSION Vendor's Certificate I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the items and totals listed ' herein are proper charges for materials,merchandise or services furnished to the State of PO BOX 42675 Washington,and that all goods furnished and/or services rendered have been provided w Nout OLYMPIA WA 98504-2675 discrimination because of age,sex,mantal status,race,creed color,national origin,handicap, religion,or Vietnam era or disabled veterans status ?a..+.w'"`'?"-;.,y-_>r�•<«£r��,�=-a.� cn�-„'n'R-e ;.,�_nz„�'s�s--n".�'= VENDOR OR CLAIMANT Warrant is to tie a able,'to -- _ Kent Arts Commission X BY; 220 4th Ave South -(SIGN IN BLUE INK) Kent WA 98032-5838 P� q 22 (DATE) FEDERAL I D NO OR SOCIAL SECURITY NO(For Reporting Personal Service Contract Payments to IRS) RECEIVED BY DATE RECEIVED 91-6001254 , <i w-r; UNIT DATE" DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT FOR AGENCY USE For Grants to Organizations -- FY2011 Midsized Arts Organization Program 1 MAO _ 4.._ Per Attachment"A"Scope of Work I Contract# 2011136 - E 101 State Funds i $0.00 [ , 202 State Funds ( I $0.00 ` 102 Federal Funds ' i $4,380 00 , November 2010 Payment I Total: $4,380.00 PREPARED BY TELEPHONE NUMBER DATE AGENCY APPROVAL DATE ' Christel Ratliff 360.586.0026 DOC DATE PMT DUE CURRENT DOC NO REF DOC NO. VENDOR NUMBER USE TAX VENDOR MESSAGE UBI NUMBER DATE REF M --+rAPPINI STER INDEX P.SUB waRKCuss Coorm amirmowx ; 00C TRANS 0 FUND PROGRAM SUB SUB ORD B.dgel -PROJECT SUB PROJ AMOUNT INVOICE NUMBER SUE CODE 0 EX INDEX OBJ OBJ INDEX ALLOC Unit MOS PROD PHAS 001 101 00101 NZ 5MAO' 00 00 $0.00 MA02011136 , 001 202 00101 NZ 5MAO 00 00 $0 00 MA02011136 001 102 00101 NZ 2011 5MAO 00 00 $4,380.00 MA02011136 , ACCOUNTING APPROVAL FOR PAYMENT DATE WARRANT TOTAL WARRANT NUMBER Kent City Council Meeting Date November 2, 2010 ' Category Consent Calendar - 7E 1. SUBJECT: 2011 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT ACTION PLAN - APPROVE 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Approve the Proposed 2011 Community Development Block Grant Action Plan, including funding allocations and ' contingency plans, and authorize the Mayor to execute the appropriate certifications and agreements. The City receives Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) as an Entitlement City. To receive this funding, the City is required to submit a Five-Year ' Consolidated Plan for Housing & Community Development. The City's Consolidated Plan is in effect from 2008-2012. Prior to the beginning of each year of the Consolidated Plan, the City must inform HUD and the community of the specific actions that the City will execute to implement the objectives and strategies of the Consolidated Plan; this is outlined in the 2010 Action Plan. The Action Plan also includes the allocation of estimated resources that will be used to ' carry out the objectives and strategies. See the attached Staff Report for a more detailed summary. 3. EXHIBITS: Staff Report dated 10/21/10, 2011 CDBG Action Plan, and Application for Federal Assistance 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Parks & Human Services Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) li S. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? N/A Revenue? N A 1 Currently in the Budget? Yes X No 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: J PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY SERVICES Jeff Watling, Director 400 Phone: 253-856-5100 KEN T Fax: 253-856-6050 i ' WAS HI NGTON Address: 220 Fourth Avenue S. Kent, WA 98032-5895 ' October 21, 2010 TO: Kent City Council Parks and Human Services Committee ' FROM: Katherin Johnson, Housing and Human Services Manager ' THROUGH: Jeff Watling, Parks, Recreation & Community Services Director SUBJECT: 2011 CDBG Action Plan and Funding Allocations Staff Report ' The City of Kent receives Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds from the U S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) as an ' Entitlement City. To receive this funding, the City is required to submit a Five-Year Consolidated Plan for Housing & Community Development. The City's Consolidated Plan is in effect from 2008-2012. Prior to the beginning ' of each year of the Consolidated Plan, the City must inform HUD and the community of the specific actions that the City will execute to implement the objectives and strategies of the Consolidated Plan; this is outlined in the 2010 Action Plan. The Action Plan also includes the allocation of estimated resources that will be used to carry out the objectives and strategies. Citizen Participation: On September 17, 2010, the City of Kent published a public notice letting the community know the Draft 2011 Action Plan was available for review and comment for a period of thirty (30) days. On ' October 21, 2009, the Human Services Commission held a public hearing for the purpose of taking comments on the 2011 Action Plan. 1 Human Services Commission Recommendations: The Human Services Commission reviewed and approved recommendations for CDBG funding for 2011. A description of each program is included in the attached Action Plan. ' As in past years, the Commission recommended that a major portion of CDBG funds be used to support the City's Home Repair Program. This program serves many low-income, disabled and senior homeowners in Kent by providing needed repairs. The program also ensures that a portion of Kent's low/moderate-income housing stock is maintained and preserved. Impact that Congressional Action Could Have on CDBG: The amount of money Kent may receive could change depending upon the final federal appropriations bill Congress passes in the fall. Therefore, the recommended ' funding includes a contingency plan to address any potential fund changes that may occur when Congress adopts the 2011 budget. CITY OF KENT ONE-YEAR ACTION PLAN 2011 .z, Update to Consolidatedl�rP?lan�efor Housing and Community: Development Fiscal Years 2008 - 2012 } Submitted to: ` US DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING,& URBAN DEVELOPMENT Office of Community Planning and`Development Seattle Federal Office Building ',I�14 909 First Avenue, Suite 300 Seattle, WA 98104-1000 Prepare&l y- CITY'OF KENTY\ Parks,_ Recreation &=.Community Services Department Housing and Human Services Division 220 Fourth Avenue-South Kent, WA 9803,2 ,�° November 2011 KEN T ' WASNINOTON s? Mayor '` Suzette Cooke Affi CITY COUNCIL Jamie Perry, Council President Elizabeth Albertson/ Ron Harmon, Dennis Hig'g=ids '44-1 Deborah Ranniger = � Debbie Rap lee Les Thomas ,'.t.. PARKS AND HUMAN SERVICES COMMITTEE Deborah Ranniger, Chair Elizabeth Albertson ` °z Dennis Higgins Chief Administrative Officer John Hodgson t\f •= HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION 6, Jon Botton, Chair Elizabeth Albertson, City Council Member , Yadira Brito, Commissioner Dini Duclos, Commissioner Aq Brett Hollis, Commissioner Carla Loux, Commissioner David Ott, Chair-elect Broderick Phillips, Commissioner , Oriana Pon, Commissioner Ted Schwarz, Commissioner David Watson, Commissioner CITY STAFF Jeff Watling, Parks, Recreation & Community Services Director Katherin Johnson, Housing & Human Services Manager Dinah R. Wilson, CDBG Coordinator & Lead Staff Merina Hanson, Senior Human Services Coordinator Jason Johnson, Human Services Coordinator ' t 1 t Contents SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.............. . . ........ 4 THE CONSOLIDATED PLAN ..... .. ........... ... ..... . .. ......... . ....... .... ... 4 THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM ...... ......... 4 t ONE-YEAR ACTION PLAN .............................................................................. 5 SECTION 2. SOURCES OF FUNDS: HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT . ...... I .. ............ ..... . ........ .. .... ............... 7 ' 2011 CDBG ESTIMATED RESOURCES ......................................................... 7 OTHER RESOURCES .............. ........... ........ ... ... 8 SECTION 3 CITY OF KENT ALLOCATION PRIORITIES AND.,'GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION ..... FUNDING PRIORITIES.. ............•• 9 SECTION 4, 2011 ACTIONS TO ACHIEVE HOUSING,AND,,GOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT GOALS . . . . ....... . ........ .....:....... >>� .... 10 DECENT HOUSING N: ••.. 10 SUITABLE LIVING ENVIRONMENT STRATEGIES................. .......... 12 ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STRATEGIES ... ....... . . . . . ......... 15 SECTION 5• SUMMARY OF PROPOSED 2011 USE OF COMMUNITY I DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT ENTITLEMENT FUNDS ......................... . 17 ATTACHMENTS ..... .... ........ ::°.:.... .......... .......... 18 ,v ATTACHMENT 1- TABLE 3A: SUMMAf��!1STATEMItNT OF SPECIFIC ANNUAL OBJECTIVES . ..... ,t.,::r. .. ,.;i. ....... ................. 19 SUMMARY/STATEMENT OF SPECIFIC ANNUAL OBJECTIVES ................ 20 ATTACHMENT 2. TABLE 313• ANNUA ��iOUSING COMPLETION GOALS.... 22 ' ANNUAL HOUSING COMPLETION GOALS . .......... ..... ....... ....... 23 ATTACHMENT 3• TABLE 3C: ANNUALiACTION PLAN LISTING OF PRO ONNUAL ACTION'PLAN LISTING,OF PR """.••.. 24 A ATTACHMENT 2011 CONSOLIDATED PLAN CERTIFICATIONS... ......... . 35 2011 CONSOLIDATED PLAN CERTIFICATIONS ........................ ........... . 36 CERTIFICATIONS�. ,.. ......... 36 • -,,Specific CECDBG�Certifications.................................................................... 40 • `%APPENDIX TO RTIFICATIONS......................................... .. . . .... 42 ' ATTACHMENT 5 NOTICE OF PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD AND PUBLIC HEARING FOR CDBG 2011 ACTION PLAN ................................ .... ..... ... .. 45 For Immediate,-Publication/Release ...................................................... .......... 46 Signature.. "`si' 47 ATTACHMENT 6. October 21, 2010 PUBLIC HEARING COMMENTS .......... 48 ATTACHMENT 7. October 21, 2010 PARKS & HUMAN SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES (CONSIDERATION OF 2011 FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS)............................ .... .. ............................................... 50 ATTACHMENT 8 November 3, 2009 MINUTES OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUTHORIZING FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS AND SUBMITTAL OF CERTIFICATIONS ... . ........... . . . . ................... .. . ...... ........................ 52 ATTACHMENT 9 EVIDENCE OF INSURANCE COVERAGE ...... ............... 56 tAPPENDIX A: ANTI-POVERTY STRATEGIES...... . . ....... ....................... .. 58 Page 2 of 76 . � � APPEND/ E NEEDS OF PUBLIC HOUSING........... . . ..... 6 APPENDIX c FAIR HOUSING . . .. ................. . . 65 APPENDIX » MONITORING . ............... . . . . ..... BB APPENDIX m POLICIES ............. ............... 70 APPENDIX R FISCAL AUDITS . ... . . .......... . .. . 7 APPENDIX G. LEAD-BASED PAINT HAZARDS..... . .......... 7 � � d\� ^ @ 11� 2- , yy . : \ �\ » � � � � Page a 3 76 � 2011 ONE-YEARACTION PLAN FOR C TI O HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SECTION 1 : INTRODUCTION AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY THE CONSOLIDATED PLAN � ;H Purpose of the Consolidated Plan The City of Kent Consolidated Plan for Housing and =community Development provides a framework for implementing housing;human services and community development activities from 2008-20'12. >� The Plan assists the City by: • Serving as a planning document thattahe.tty prepares in partnership with its citizens, community organizations, businesses and other stakeholders • Describing the City's strategic,1plan for imple- enting the Community Development Block Grant Program' (CDBG) • Measuring performance and tracking goals • Assessing the resources, needs, economic and living conditions, 1 • demographics;homelessness, housing costs, etc., of the City of Kent • Reporting Q„n[ specific7� items required by the U.S. Department of Housing and:Urban Development (HUD) as a requirement for receiving Communitybevelop,rpent Block Grant (CDBG) funds THE CONII`k" NITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM National Objectives The Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG) is a federal program that is administered by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). CDBG funds are provided to states and units of local government. As a grantee, the City of Kent is authorized to fund eligible activities that meet national and local goals/objectives. The broad national objectives are as follows: • Activities benefiting low/moderate-income persons' • Activities which aid in preventing or eliminating slums or blight Activities meeting community development needs that have a particular urgency because existing conditions pose a serious and For the purposes of the CDGB program, low-income persons are defined as individuals who are members of households whose total annual income is between 0 to 50% of the Area Median ' Income (AMI) Moderate-income persons are individuals who are members of households with incomes between 51-80% of AMI Page 4 of 76 immediate threat to the health or welfare of the community and other , financial resources do not exist to meet such needs ' The 2008-2012 Consolidated Plan directs funds exclusively toward meeting the national objective of benefiting low/moderate-income persons. ' Performance Measurements While the national objectives are broad, measurements used to determine whether activities are successful are more specific. Outcome performance measurement system objectives are as follows: , • Provide a suitable living environment • Provide decent housing • Provide economic opportunities X' ONE-YEAR ACTION PLANell Purpose of the One-Year Action Plani' Each year the City of Kent executes specific actions to implement the , objectives and strategies of the/fide-year Consolidated Plan. Actions that will be undertaken in 2011 are outlined An, this One-Year Action Plan, which describes both the allocation of estimated resources and a narrative of what , will be done. In a given year, it is`,possible that,no steps will be taken to achieve a particular strategy. Similarly, it is expected that during the course of the year, the City will be presented with unanticipated opportunities that can be capitalized_upon to help meet g,dals and strategies. When this occurs, the City will seize the moment to further,,,the goals and strategies defined in , the Consolidated Plan. r" Citizen�Par'_ticipation The de,yeIdpment,,6F,the Ond-Year Action Plan includes a Citizen Participation Process involving public notification of the availability of the plan draft and an opportunity for cornmments prior to finalizing the One-Year Action Plan. Persons'" with disabilities are encouraged to participate in the Citizen ' Participation\Process' and the public notice describes how accommodations will be made.',, Page 6 of 76 One-Year Action Plan Structure ' The One-Year Action Plan contains five (5) sections: • Section 1-The Introduction and Executive Summary: This section contains a concise overview of the Consolidated Plan, the CDBG Program, and the One-Year Action Plan. • Section 2-Sources of Funds: Housing & Community Development: This section includes an estimate of federal funds allocated from HUD as well as general funds provided'by the City to provide human services. • Section 3-City of Kent Allocation Priorities and Geographical Distribution: This section discusses funding priorities that were established by the City's Human Services+Commission: , • Section 4-2011 Actions to Achieve Housing and Community ' Development Goals: This section outlines the specific actions that the City will undertake in 2011 to execute the-objectives and,�� strategies of the Five-Year Consolidated Plan. Section 5-Summary of Proposed 2011 Use of Community Development Block Grant Entitlement Funds: This section includes a list of CDBG projects that the City will fund in 2011. This section also contains contingency-plans,describing what will happen in the event of an increase or a decrease i,t1,CDBG funds. ,Y rt^Z 26 �Y Page 6 of 76 SECTION 2: SOURCES OF FUNDS: HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 2011 CDBG ESTIMATED RESOURCES One of the major tools for accomplishing the goals of the Consolidated Plan is ' the annual allocation of CDBG funds provided by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. The City estimates that $848,557 in CDBG funds will be available for the January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2011 budget year. The following outlines the total anticipated resources to implement the 2011 Action Plan: CDBG ESTIMATED RESOURCES Federal CDBG Allocation $848,557 estimated � Recaptured -0- CDBG Program Income -0- ESG 11 -0- r,. HOME $,iE�, -0- HOPWA _ -0- Total CDBG/Federal, $848,557 Resources �a t s � x Page 7 of 76 OTHER RESOURCES tGENERALFUNDS The City of Kent allocates one percent (1%) of the general fund to provide human services directly to Kent residents through contracts with non-profit agencies. The projects listed below will receive funding in 2011. Agency/Program Catholic Community Services - Homeless Services Program $40 000.00 Catholic Community Services - Volunteer Chore Services $10,000.00 Center for Career Alternatives - Adult Job Placement &s,li" $10,000.00 Training Program Center for Children &Youth Justice - Safe Havens Vi sftati`o $11,000.00 Ctr. Child Care Resources - Child Care Financial Assistance T-1 $26 000.00 Children's Home Society - Early Head Start ,,$20,000.00 Communities In Schools of Kent - Mentorin �� s ` H:$351000.00 DAWN - DV Continuum of Services $65 000.00 Dynamic Family Services - Children with Special Needs $55,000.00 HealthPoint - Primary Dental $25,000.00 HealthPoint - Primary Medical $20,000.00 Intercommunity Mercy Housing -".,Homef'ess,Case :dik,� $10,000.00 Management Jewish Family Services - Immi rant/Refu ,ee`Ser-vfce Centers $10,000.00 Kent Food Bank & Emer enc Servic`es Food Bank $70,000.00 Kent Youth & Family Services KYFS -`clinical Services $80,000.00 KYFS - Head Start & ECEAP Preschool Pr rams $15,000.00 KYFS - Outreach $10,000.00 1 KYFS - Watson Manor Transitional Living Program $10,000.00 - King County-B6rtAssociation - Community Legal Services $10,000.00 King County SexualAssault Resource Center - $22,000.00 Comprehensive SeXual.Assault Services MSC Emergency Services $30 000.00 MSC Housing Continud,M Services 125,000.00 Multi-Servi¢e.Center, eneral Education Program $10,000.00 Pediatric Interim Caretenter - Interim Care of Drug- $10,000.00 Exposed Infants Seattle-King County Department of Public Health - S. King $15,143.00 -County Mobile Medical Program South King Council of Human Services - Capacity Building $7,500.00 Project Ukrainian Community Center - Refugee Assistance Project 10 000.00 Valley Cities Counseling & Consultation - Senior Counseling 32,000.00 at Kent Senior Center WWEE - Economic Self-REACH Plus 35 000.00 TOTAL: $828r643.00 Page 8 of 76 SECTION 3: CITY OF KENT ALLOCATION PRIORITIES AND GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION FUNDING PRIORITIES In addition to the Consolidated Plan, allocation of CDBG funds is guided by the City of Kent's human services funding priorities as established by the Human Services Commission. The City targets funding to the following areas when allocating funding for regional and local human service's: , • Meeting Community Basics: Ensuring"that people facing hardship have access to resources to help meet immediate basic needs. • Increasing Self-Reliance: Helping individuals b'feak out of the cycle of poverty by improving access to service's-;,,6" removing barriers to employment. • Strengthening Children and-Oamilies: r_oviding ch)'dren, youth and families with community resources needed to support their positive development, including early intervention & prevention services. r • Building a Safer Com`rifiu'iiity,: Providing resources and services that reduce violence, crijne, and neglect in our community. • Improving Health an&,, ell-Being': ;Providing access to services that allow individuals to improve their mental and physical health, overall well_b"ein'g;--and ability to live independently. GEOGRAPHICAL` D�ISTRITUI ION Because low/moderatei7n bme individuals and families reside in various parts of the City, of=Kent, funds are geographically distributed throughout the City. A high concentration of fund�s is distributed to agencies that serve residents in the East and West Hill neighborhoods, which include a high concentration of low-income individuals. Page 9 of 76 SECTION 4: 2011 ACTIONS TO ACHIEVE HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT GOALS ' DECENT HOUSING STRATEGIES Objective 1: Enhance availability of decent housing for low/moderate income-residents Strategies a) Work with public, private and non-private partners to increase funding and leverage resources to increase access to affordable housing I • Action: Participate in the King County Housing Funders Group. This group meets to discuss new -projects or funding sources that are available for homeless services within King County. • Participate in the South King ;County Forum on Homelessness, an organization supported by South Xing County (SKC) service providers which promotes networking and the coordination of activities to end homelessness. • Action: Participate in the South kir'g'Ngounty Human Services Planners Group. � �-� b) Invest in programs thati f help to ; 'maintain tke existing stock of affordable housing • Action: Allocate $464,063; in CDBG funds to the Home Repair 1 Program'to support the existing level of homeownership in Kent. • Actioh,*,'Provide Home Repair Program services to residents in the Panther Lake-Annexation Area, which became a part of the 1 City on'J,uly,1 120 0. di-°r P Action: Work<` regionally to improve home repair policies by participating on-regional policy committees. Action: Conduct�,�a performance audit and client satisfaction survey -to, evaluate the effectiveness of the Home Repair Program. •. In 2010, the City used Neighborhood Stabilization Program Funds to begin implementation of its Move to Housing Program (MTH). The City is partnering with Habitat for Humanity of Seattle/South King County on this project. NSP funds are used to purchase, rehabilitate and sell up to three (3) foreclosed residential properties to a low/moderate-income home owner. The City also has the option of using a portion of the money to provide down payment assistance to help a low/moderate- income Kent residents purchase foreclosed residential properties. The City will complete the housing rehabilitation phase and sell the properties in 2010-2011. c) Invest in programs that support the ability of homeowners to stay in their own homes Page 10 of 76 i • Action: Allocate $10,000 in CDBG funds to the City of Kent Fall Prevention Program to provide handicap accessibility items for low/moderate-income residents.2 • Action: Allocate $62,500 in CDBG funds to the City of Kent Energy-Efficiency Program to provide weatherization and ' energy-efficiency appliances to low-income homeowners. • Action: Continue to actively enforce code provisions requiring mobile home park owners to submit a relocation report and plan to the Human Services Division prior to issuing eviction notices to tenants who must relocate due to closure, Change of use, or a zoning re-designation. ` ' • Action: Allocate $60,383 in CDBG funds''td the Multi-Service Center Housing Stability Program for housing continuum services, which will include assistance for a variety of housing. CDBG funds will be used to provlde'grants\to�,low/moderate- income households to prevent eviction or to as`sist�with move-in costs. • Action: Continue to implement recommendations ; from the Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice report. d) Encourage local incentives for developers to create affordable housing • Action: Developers ,.responded to a Cottage Housing Demonstration Ordln'ph661,�that was adopted by the Kent City Council in 2008; this ordinance allowed up to two cottage housing communities,.I The two proposed Cottage Housing Developments are App�le�'Laiiie Cottages and Blueberry Cottages. The City will continue i 6l follow the progress of the housing 111 communities. 'I, `���` I • Action: Continue to follow th'e progress of a 2009 ordinance that was passed by the Kent City Council which provides downtown developers, of multi-family, mixed-use housing complexes an �s} Wight-year property tax exemption. Objective 2: Invest.in services and facilities that prevent homelessness and ensure that service-enriched services are provided when homelessness occurs I�Yw Strategies ` -3 f, a) Actively support regional and sub-regional efforts to provide a coordinated continuum of housing and services for the homeless that meet the needs of Kent and South King County residents • Action: Continue providing staff support to efforts such as Safe Harbors (a homeless management information system) and the Committee to End Homelessness in King County. Z This project is funded biannually. , Page 11 of 76 1 Action: Participate on grant review committees that make recommendations for funding to affordable housing and other programs that prevent homelessness. b) Support a variety of appropriate options for individuals with special needs • Action: Allocate $65,000 in General Funds to DAWN to support a continuum of domestic violence services. • Action: Allocate $26,940 in CDBG funds to YWCA to provide 1 • transitional housing and case management services to homeless domestic violence survivors and their children o c) Support efforts to move people from shelters anf Ansitional housing to permanent housing when appropriate • Action: Allocate $125,000 in General Fund§vto the Multi-service Center Housing Continuum. Servicees are;3, provided on a continuum based on the client's needs and cilents� who are ready to move to permanent housing ,are assisted. fi d) Support human services programs that address the needs oft homeless persons \� • Action: Allocate $10,785 in CDBG funds to Catholic Community Services to support shelters for homeless women with chemical addictions, while providing case management to help them gain self-sufficiency, end homelessness and maintain sobriety. a 1 SUITABLE LIVING ENVIRONMENT $TRATEGIES � Objective 1: Enhance A Suitable Living Environment Strategies AI a) Increase"',fnclusioh rrof,,immigrants and refugees and people of color in the life of the Kerit.,�community by supporting efforts to leverage resources and increase access to services for immigrants and refugees "`_ • Action: Allocate $18,390 in CDBG funds to Refugee Women's Alliance, Systems Navigation and Access Project (S.N.A.P.), to ,connect immigrants/refugees to linguistically and culturally appropriate information and services and case management. • Action: The City will continue to work with a group of Somali Bantu refugees to develop several plots at the local Pea Patch. The Somali Bantu group will provide maintenance and oversight in exchange for the plots. In addition, the City will examine the feasibility of expanding this service to other refugee/immigrant populations. • Action: The City is applying for a private grant to create a li community P-patch for East Hill residents in an area that has a large Asian/Pacific Islander population, along with many Russian and Ukrainian immigrants. Page 12 of 76 • Action: Allocate $10,000 in General Funds to the Ukrainian Community Center of Washington to assist refugee families in overcoming barriers to self-sufficiency by providing immediate assistance to families through advocacy and case management. • Action: Allocate $10,000 in General Funds to the Center for ' Career Alternatives to provide job skills training and employment services to public housing residents and other low- income residents residing in Kent. • Action: Continue to provide technical assistance and community linkages to recently created non-profits and.service providers that provide assistance to immigrants and refugees. Also, explore other options to increase capacity building. • Action: Provide staff support to the Kent Cultural Diversity Initiative Group (KC-DIG). KC-DIG consists of service providers and community members who ,Have cultural and language- specific expertise working with ,imiimigrants and refugees. The group meets monthly and , works toward influencing policy, enhancing collaboration, leveraging resources, developing a closer relationship with the City of;.Kent, and serving as a resource within the community. • Action: Continue to expand 'asset building, cultural enhancement, educational support and community connection activities by supporting People of Color in Philanthropy, a countywide organization that promotes racial equity and social justice for communities of color through philanthropy. b) Invest funds invpr'ograms that are located in neighborhoods with a large numbef`bfllow=income residents • Action',, Continue to invest funds in non-profits that locate offices/services on .the East and West Hills of Kent, areas with a significant,number of'low/moderate-income residents. c) Support collaboration between human services agencies to achieve efficiency, co-location\of services, and reduction in human services costs ` � � T • Action: Continue to support the Alliance Center, the one-stop facility for human services programs that is located in Kent. •_ : .Action: Encourage and identify opportunities for small and recently organized agencies to share office space, collaborate on grant applications and explore opportunities to merge organizations that have compatible missions. ' • Action: Allocate $7,500 in General Funds to the South King Council of Human Services Capacity Building Project to strengthen agencies and coalitions that make up the South King County human services system. d) Support programs that enhance or increase culturally appropriate and culturally-specific services • Action: Continue to work on implementing recommendations from the Somali Community Engagement Project. Page 13 of 76 Objective 2: Create a community that supports healthy individuals and families Strategies ' a) Support programs that encourage healthy lifestyle behaviors, including helping children maintain healthy body weight ' • Action: Allocate $70,000 in General Funds to Kent Food Bank & Emergency Services to provide emergency food bags and emergency assistance to needy individuals and families residing in Kent. • Action: Work on initiatives that help child �h'maintain a healthy body weight b) Increase accessibility to recreational opportunities �y encouraging the location of programs in neighborhoods and `neighboeh,pod centers • Action: Work with Parks Department recreational staff on exploring the option of expanding recreational opportunities to low/moderate-income neighborhood centers. • Action: Work with Parks Department staff on exploring opportunities for collaborating, with KC-DIG to expand recreational opportunities to limited-English proficient and non- English-speaking seniors and youth. c) Enhance access to low-cost",medical.services for+low/moderate-income �s individuals • Action: Allocate $45,000 jri�,b',Gend?6P Funds to Health Point to provide primary medical �and dental services to low/moderate- income individuals. ' • Action: Allocate $10.7&V,nVn CDBG funds to HealthPoint (Healthcare for the Homeless Project) to provide nursing services to homeless families and Individuals living in 'transitional housing and other sites where the homeless g congregate. .u, F°M i Page 14 of 76 ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES STRATEGIES , Objective 1: Increase employment opportunities for low/moderate- income persons and the long-term unemployed ' Strategies a) Encourage and promote employment opportunities for all residents, t including youth _ Action: Work to ensure that low/moderte-income Kent residents have equal access to jobs/crbated through the development of the Kent Station and the'Shq,Ware Center. Advocate for Kent residents to havo,;.accessfbifiy to living wage jobs. t; � Continue to partner with Evergreen Communit�!�,�Development Corporation, a non-profit ,dertified by the SMalf_ Business Administration to make 504`Iloans, byl,Wiiiting suppofti116tters for existing and new businesses` seeking 'loans to purchase their own real estate. When local businesses own their own property, this leads to business stability. Encourage redevelopment/investment,�fn low/moderate-income neighborhoods through the use of New Market Tax Credits. b) Support programs that remove or decrease barriers to education and employment for low-income individuals Action: ; Facilitate collaboration between manufacturing businesses and the School District on youth job training and/or internship programs by ;helping to mitigate insurance/risk concerns.: c) Support training'_ aod-'couns'eling'programs that teach people how to start, and expand-,i$ mall businesses such as micro-enterprises that employ five or lesserhployees, one of whom owns the business Action: Allocate ,$25,000 in CDBG funds to Washington Community Alliance for Self-Help (WA CASH) to provide business training and business development services to low- income women, people with disabilities and other under-served populations. Action: Allocate $35,000 in General Funds to Washington Women's Employment and Education (WWEE) to provide computer training and a job readiness class to low-income Kent residents. d) Support job readiness and job retraining programs e) Encourage services that support employees in maintaining or advancing their employment opportunities including, but not limited to, transportation and childcare Action: Allocate $26,000 in General Funds to Child Care Resources to provide child care financial assistance to Page 15 of 76 low/moderate-income families who work or pursue education to enhance their job opportunities. objective 2: Promote financial well-being Strategies 1 a) Fund programs that educate residents on how to manage money and establish good credit b) Support programs that teach residents how to avoid the pitfalls of predatory lending practices ''" Action: Provide education materials on how to avoid predatory lending at the Financial Literacy Fair and in the Human Services Office. v < i; z, c) Support financial literacy education z ,, o prorrlote,, and sustain homeownership • Action: Support the Financiall,"Literacy Fair sponsored by the Riverview Community Chui c6& ' �ry Action: Distribute fair housing,=,'materials at community events and during training provided to l9ndlords. 'M,rvrvM `i -�4r As,W, £- y� i , rvrvry z r{xo 1 1 Page 16 of 76 SECTION 5: SUMMARY OF PROPOSED 2011 USE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT ENTITLEMENT FUNDS3 PUBLIC SERVICE PROJECTS Project Funding Amount Catholic Community Services: $ 10,785.00 Katherine's House !' HealthPoint: Healthcare for the $ 10,785.#b Homeless V Multi-Service Center: Housing $ Q01383.00 Stability Program » � Refugee Women's Alliance (ReWA): $,118,390.0d"' Systems Navigation & Access Project YWCA: Anita Vista Transitional $ 26,940,00 Housing Total Public Service: � �,` <,',� �y, �127 283.00,, �. Contingency Plan Increase y_ �i'�i` ' In the event of an in'crifise In public service funds above the preliminary estimate, additional funds will be proportionately divided between the funded programs. Decrease In the eve''rit 7711a"decrease in CDBG public service funds, the decrease will be proportionately.'diyided among the funded agencies with the exception of MSC Housing Stability Program, with no agency receiving less than $10,785 in funding. 3In the event of a Hurricane Katrina-like natural disaster, the City reserves the option to redistribute CDBG funds to respond to such issues. Page 17 of 76 CAPITAL PROJECTS Project Funding Amount City of Kent Energy-Efficienc Program $ 62,500.00 -City of Kent Home Repair Program $464,063.00 City of Kent Fire Department: Fall Prevention < 10 000.00>4 -Washington CASH: Kent Micro-enter rise Initiative 5 25,000.00 Total Capital: $551 563.00 Contingency Plan Increase In the event additional capital funds are received','or recaptured, the additional funds will be allocated between th6"City of Kent Home:Repair Program and the Energy-Efficiency Program.," Decrease If there is a decrease in funds, projects will be curt in the following order: 1. Washington CASH �.1_- 115 .�. „: 2. City of Kent Energy Efficiency Program 3. City of Kent Home Repair Program N, PLANNING AND ADMINISTRATION ' Planning and Administration 169 711.00 Total Planning and,Administration: $169 711.00 The City will expend,,tl e,fpli�"200/6'qf, Entitlement funding for Planning and Administration. TOTAL ESTIMATED CDBG'BUDGET FOR FY2011 Public$Orvices $127 283.00 Capital $551,563.00 Planning and'Admihi gtration $169,711.00 TOTAL: $848 557.00 t ATTACHMENTS 4This project is funded biannually. Funding for 2010-2011 was deducted from the 2010 CDBG allocation. Page 18 of 76 i ATTACHMENT 1: TABLE 3A: SUMMARY/STATEMENT OF SPECIFIC ANNUAL OBJECTIVES 4 t( } �tY C� Page 19 of 76 TABLE 3A SUMMARY/STATEMENT OF SPECIFIC ANNUAL OBJECTIVES Obj. Outcome/Objective Source Performance Year Expected Actual Percent ## of Indicators # # Completed Funds DH- Enhance accessibility to CDBG -Number of 2011 12 YWCA 1 decent housing by households 1 CCS providing the following: receiving # TBDS transitional housing & housing and 5O,KFD case management for case �0-HRP domestic violence management .�; ATO L: survivors and their -Number of Al r �` 123 children; shelter and households case management to receiving �J z rz single homeless shelter or DP_A', women; handicap -Number of accessibility items to households '` low/moderate-income receiving Ake... Kent residents; handicap, ' " rehabilitation assistance accessibility- .•` and health and safety items repairs to ;_ •Number of ; low/moderate-income ., households Kent homeowners; and ° _itet )vmg home' energy-efficiency repairt��°�. ? tsry, appliances to "�ssistan' e "a„ low/moderate-income `•�lumber of homeowners households receiving energy- x efficiency appliances • • Obj. Outcome/Objective Source Performance Year Expected Actual Percent # of Indicators # # Completed Funds SL- Enhance access61`lWV1 to CDBG -Number of 2011 40 ReWA 1 a suitable living persons 19 environment by connected to HealthPoint conrle-Cting services and Total: 59 immjgrants/refugees to information and Imguisticall&ulturally receiving case appropriate;s,e'rvlces management and providing'case -Number of management; and by homeless providing nursing persons services to the receiving homeless nursing services 5 Organization and number served to be determined. Page 20 of 76 _,SUSTAINABILITY OF SUITABLE LIVING ENVIRONMENT Obj. Outcome/Objective Source Performance Year Expected Actual Percent # of Indicators # # Completed Funds SL- Address the need to CDBG -Number of 2011 47 MSC 3 sustain a suitable living persons Total: 47 environment by receiving providing housing grants stability grants to low- income or homeless individuals TABLE 3A CONTINUED ECONOMIC.ACCESSIBILITY TO OPPORTUNITY Obj. Outcome/Objective Source Performance Year, Expected Actual Percent # of Indicators # # Completed , Funds �� EO- Enhance the CDBG -Number of '„ 2011 30 WA 1 accessibility of persons CASH" economic opportunity receiving Total: 30 by assisting with the assistance in development of micro- developing"a ' enterprise businesses micro- enterprise -,_business ^ y/ r Page 21 of 76 i ATTACHMENT 2: TABLE 3B: ANNUAL HOUSING COMPLETION GOALS •qq o�;� y @yam 1 I01 r. Page 22 of 76 i TABLE 3B ANNUAL HOUSING COMPLETION GOALS Resources used durin the eriod Annual Expected CDBG HOME ESG HOPWA Number Com leted ANNUACAFFORDABLIE` ' HOUSING GOALS (SEC. 215), > - Homeless Households 13 X ,��� ❑ ❑ Non-homeless households ❑ ❑ ❑ Special Needs Households ❑ ANNUAL AFFORDABLE RENTAL HOUSING GOALS SEC. 215 Acquisition of existing units ❑ ❑ ❑ Production of new units ❑ ❑ ❑ Rehabilitation of existing ❑" ❑ ❑ ❑ units Rental Assistance ❑ ❑ ❑ Total Sec. 215 Affordable ❑ ❑ ❑ Rental ANNUAL AFFORDABLE OWNER HOUSING GOALS SEC. 215 Acquisition of existing units t ❑ Production of new units "� ❑ ❑ Rehabilitation of existing 110 X ❑ units i Homebu er Assistahi e ❑ ❑ ❑ Total Sec. 215 Affordable_ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ OwWer s„ ANNUAL AFFORDABLE � HOUSING GOALS (SEC. -215) - Ac uissitlon of existing units ❑ ❑ ❑ Produ'ttien of new units ❑ ❑ __ ❑ Rehabilitatib n,of existing ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ units =- Homebu er Assistance TBD X ❑ ❑ Total Sec. 21S Affordable ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Housing ANNUAL HOUSING GOALS Annual Rental Housing Goal ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Annual Owner Housing Goal ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Total Annual Housing 123 X ❑ El ❑ Goal Page 23 of 76 ATTACHMENT 3: TABLE 3C: ANNUAL ACTION PLAN LISTING OF PROJECTS Al t � ey i I Page 24 of 76 TABLE 3C ANNUAL ACTION PLAN LISTING OF PROJECTS Jurisdiction's Name: City of Kent Priority Need: High: Owner Occupied Housing Project Title: City of Kent, Parks, Recreation & Community Services: Energy-Efficiency Program Description This project will provide weather¢ation and energy-efficiency apbllances to low/moderate-income residents. The purpose is to decrease energy costs. The grantee expects to serve approximately six (6) unduplicated households during the 2011 program year. Objective category: ❑ Suitable Living Environmernte.,N` X Decent Housing ❑ Economic Opportunity 'n Outcome Category X Availability/Accessibility-110 Affordabl,jty ❑ Sustainability Location/Target Area: Throughout the City of_Kent. The Home Repair Program is at: 220 4th Ave. S., Kent, WA 98032 Objective Number Project ID6 ,'Funding DH-3 Sources HUD Matrix Code CDBG Citation CDBG $62,500 14F Energy Efficiency 570.202(b)(4) Energy Improvements Efficient Im rovements Type of Recipient; CDBG National Objective ESG Grantee 1 1, LMI Housing 208 a 3 Start Date , Completion Date HOME 1/1/11 12/31 11' PerformancerfffdYcator Annual Units HOPWA • Numf e'r of househplds 6 Kent households receiving energy-(Aciency= , moo, liances `': Local AID ' Units Upon Completion Prior Year Funds Other Fundin Total $62,500 The primary purpose of the project is to help: ❑ The Homeless X Low/Mod-Income Persons ❑ Persons with HIV/AIDS ❑ Persons with Disabilities 6 Project ID will be added after projects entered into IDIS. Page 25 of 76 Jurisdiction's Name: City of Kent Priority Need: High: Owner Occupied Housing Project Title: City of Kent, Parks, Recreation & Community Services: Home Repair Program Description This project will offer rehabilitation assistance and health and safety repairs to low/moderate-income Kent households; a significant number of seniors are assisted in this project. The purpose is to assist Kent residents to rehabilitate their homes in order to maintain housing stock within the City. The grantee expects to serve approximately 80 unduplicated households during the 2011 program year. Objective category: ❑ Suitable Living Environment „ X Decent Housing ❑ Economic Opportunity Outcome Category X Availability/Accessibility ❑ Affordability ❑ SU,tainability Location/Target Area: Throughout the City of Kent. The Home R pair Program is at: 220 4th Ave. S., Kent, WA 98032 .aM1i"cx e55�e= Objective Number Project ID' Funding �.; DH-3 Sources HUD Matrix Code 4GCitation CDBG $464,063 14A Rehab: Single Unit Residential 570.20 ``' ,, 1 Rehabi litatior�Y�"_ Type of Recipient CDBG ESG Grantee Objective LMt�Housing 208 a 3 Start Date Completion Date HOME 12 31/1'1 Performance Indicator Annual Units HOPWA Number of households receiving 80 Kent home repair assistance `- households �10Y, Local ID, Units Upon Prior Year BG1110 Completion Funds 2 Other �i Funding „e Total 464 063 The primary purpose of the project is to help: ❑ The Homeless X Low/Mod-Income Persons ❑ Persons with HIV/AIDS ❑ Persons with Disabilities Project ID will be added after projects entered into IDIS. Page 26 of 76 Jurisdiction's Name: City of Kent Priority Need: High: Resident Occupied Housing Project Title: City of Kent Fire Department: Fall Prevention Program Description This project will provide handicap accessibility items for homeowners. The purpose is to help residents remain in their homes by installing items that prevent falls. The grantee expects to serve approximately 30 unduplicated households during the 2011 program year. This program is funded biannually. This is the second year of funding and funds were allocated in the 2010 CDBG budget. Objective category: ❑ Suitable Living Environment X Decent Housing ❑ Economic Opportunity Outcome Category X Availability/Accessibility ❑ Affordability ❑ $' gstainability Location/Target Area: Throughout the City,of Kent. The Home'Repair Program is at: 220 4th Ave. S., Kent, WA 98012 Objective Number Project IDa`v Funding DH-3 Sources HUD Matrix Code r CDBG Citation CDBG $10,000 14A Rehab: Single Unit Residential` `_'; 570:202 Rehabilitation Type of Recipient CDBG National °'ESG Grantee Objective LMI 208 ao 3 Housing Start Date Completion Date HOME 1 1 11i 12/31/11 Performance Indicator"p>,'�, Annual Units HOPWA • Number of households rdceiving 30 Kent handicap,accessibility item,, households Local,11), � _ Units Upon Prior Year BG1120 , Completion Funds T� , .3 Other Funding Total $10 000 =s� The primary purpose of the project is to help: ❑ The Homeless X Low/Mod-Income Persons ❑ Persons with HIV/AIDS ❑ Persons with Disabilities Page 27 of 76 Jurisdiction`s Name: City of Kent Priority Need: High Project Title: City of Kent, Parks, Recreation & Community Services: Planning & Administration Description The City of Kent will use funds to administer the City's CDBG projects and to carry other strategies outlined in its 2008 - 2012 Consolidated Plana 'Funds will be used for general CDBG program administration costs. Objective category: N/A Suitable Living Environment,;Shl o Decent Housing ❑ Economic Opportunity My � Outcome Category N/A Availability/Accessibility ❑ Affordability ❑ Sustainability ` Location/Target Area: Throughout the City q Ke tv The CDBG Program is at: 220 4th Ave. S., Kent, WA 98032 Objective Number Projed p;�; ' Funding ;,, so'urces N A �� HUD Matrix Code CDBG Citation ���`����. CDBG $169,711 21A General Program 570.205 Admin. Type of Recipient 3�=- ' CDBG NationalC7bjective ESG Grantee Planning & Adrnin, 208 d 4 "5 Start Date ly ;' Completion Date HOME 1 1/11 12/31 11 PerformanbYIhd cator Annual Units HOPWA N/A ;ii N/A Local ID, Units Upon Completion Prior Year Funds BG1101," 'v, �. Other Funding � 1, Total 169 711 The primary p rp°ose,of the project is to help: 1 ❑ The Homeless X Low/Mod-Income Persons ❑ Persons with HIV/AIDS ❑ Persons with Disabilities Page 28 of 76 3urisdiction's Name: City of Kent Priority Need: High: Shelter Project Title: Catholic Community Services: Katherine's House Description This project will receive funds to provide shelter and case management for homeless women residing in Kent, The sub-recipient expects to shelter one (1) individual during the 2011 program year. Objective category: ❑ Suitable Living Environment X,Decent Housing ❑ Economic Opportunity Outcome Category X Availability/Accessibility ❑ Affordability ❑ Sustainability Location/Target Area: Kent, WA (Confidential location) Objective Number Project ID A ,_,Funding DH-1 :Sources HUD Matrix Code CDBG Citation r`'' CDBG $10,785 05 Public Services 570.201(e) Public Servides. Type of Recipient CDBP�Iotio`nal Objective ESG Private Non-profit Sub- bmited,Clientele , recipient 208 a 2 i A , Start Date Completion Date HOME 1 1/11 : : ' 12 31/11 Performance Indicator; ,',' Annual Unit s�� HOPWA Number of persons 1 mdividuak, `r receiving shelter Local ID Units Upon Completion Prior Year BG1109 Funds - Other Funding �d Total 30 785 The pHinary purpose of,the project is to help: X The 4Q'meless ❑ Low/Mocl-income Persons ❑ Persons WithlH'IV/AIDS' ❑ Persons with,EPjsabilities Page 29 of 76 Jurisdiction's Name: City of Kent Priority Need: High: Health Care Project Title: HealthPoint: Healthcare for the Homeless Description This project will offer nursing services to homeless individuals who reside in Kent- area transitional and domestic violence shelters. The purpose is to provide on-site nursing services to homeless persons. The sub-recipient expects to serve approximately 19 unduplicated households during the 2011 program year. Objective category: X Suitable Living Environment µ. ❑ Decent Housing ❑ Economic Opportunity Outcome Category X Availability/Accessibility ❑ A`lo`r ability oi`Sustainability Location/Target Area: Kent area shelters 'CHCKC clinic is at: 403 E. Meeker St., #300, Kent, WA 9803014, Ail, ! Objective Number Project ID Funding SL-1 Sources HUD Matrix Code CDBG'Otation CDBG $10,785 05M Health Services 570.201(e)?ublic Services . Type of Recipient CDBG NatiQrla ESG Private Non-profit Sub-� Objective Limited Clientele recipient �r ' -,208 a 2 'i A Start Date ','Completion Date HOME 1/1/11 3' i 12 31/11 Performance Indicator \ � y' Annual Units HOPWA • Number of persons 19 Kent residents receiving nursing services X Local ID ,<Units Upon Completion Prior Year BG1102 Funds Other Funding Total 10 785 The primary purpose'of the project is to help: X The Homeless ❑ Low/Mod-Income Persons ❑ Persons with HIV/AIDS ❑ Persons with Disabilities Page 30 of 76 Jurisdiction's Name: City of Kent Priority Need: High: Housing Project Title: Multi-Service Center: Housing Stability Program i Description This project will provide housing stability grants to low-income or homeless individuals. The purpose of this project is to prevent homelessness. The sub- recipient expects to serve approximately 47 unduplicated households during the 2011 program year. Objective category: X Suitable Living Environment o Decent Housing ❑ Economic Opportunity Outcome Category ❑ Availability/Accessibility ❑ Affordability X Sustainability Location/Target Area: 515 W. Harrison St., Kent, WA 98032 Objective Number Project ID Funding DH-1 Sources HUD Matrix Code CDBG Citation CDBG $60,383 05 Public Services 570.201(e) Public Services Type of Recipient CDBG Natlogpl Objective" ,ESG Private Non-profit Sub- Limited Clientele recipient 208 a 2 i C Start Date Completion_Dte � HOME 1 1/11 12/31 11'- Performance Indicator , Annual Units HOPWA • Number of persons ?49 Kent residents receiving rants/loans Local ID Units_ Upon_Completion Prior Year BG1105 Funds Other Fundin Total 60 383 The primary purpose of,the project is to help: ❑ The 'Homeless X Low/M60-Income Persons ❑ Persons with:,HIV/AIDS-- ❑ Persons with_-Qisabilities 1 1 Page 31 of 76 Jurisdiction's Name: City of Kent Priority Need: High: Accessibility for Refugees & Immigrants Project Title: Refugee Women's Alliance: Systems Navigation & Access Project Description This project will connect immigrants/refugees to linguistically and culturally appropriate information and services and provide case management. The purpose is to increase access for immigrants and refugees. The sub-recipient expects to serve approximately 40 unduplicated persons during the 2011 program year. Objective category: X Suitable Living Environment o Decent Housing ❑ Economic Opportunity Zf ,, Outcome Category X Availability/Accessibility ❑ Affordability ^rkASystamabilrty Location/Target Area: 232 Second Ave. S., Suite 107, Kent, WAW,"'98032 Objective Number Project,ID Funding SL-1 Sources HUD Matrix Code CDBG Citation CDBG $18,390 05 Public Services 570.201 e , Type of Recipient CDBG Nation�I" , ESG Private Non-profit Sub-recipient `Objective Limited,,Clientele 208 a 2 i sC1 Start Date ,, � "Completion Date HOME .. . ., 1/i/11 1� 31/11 Performance Indicator �' Annual Units HOPWA Number of persons connected to 4Q'Kent residents culturally/Imguisticaily appropriate;x�',, " information and services and case mana eme'nt tit. '� �s, Local 11);' ,§s, Units Upon Prior Year BG11,17 �_ Completion Funds h "t Other Funding Total 18 390 The primary p rposd'Q s f`the project is to help: ❑ The Homeles -,' a X Low/Mod-Income Persons ❑ Persons with HIV/AIDS ❑ Persons with Disabilities Page 32 of 76 Jurisdiction's Name: City of Kent Priority Need: High: Economic Opportunity Project Title: Washington CASH: Kent Micro-enterprise Initiative Description This project will provide assistance for the development of micro-enterprises. The purpose is to increase the income of low-income Kent residents and to stimulate business growth. The sub-recipient expects to serve approximately 30 unduplicated individuals during the 2011 program year. Objective category: ❑Suitable Living Environment g Decent Housing X Economic Opportunity Outcome Category X Availability/Accessibility ❑ Affordability, q Sustainability Location/Target Area: Kent, WAS Objective Number Project I A, Funding EC-1 ` Sources HUD Matrix Code CDBG Citatio� CDBG $25,000 18C Micro-enterprise Assistance 570.201 0 1 ii Type of Recipient CDBG National ESG Private Non-profit Sub-recipient Objective Limited Clientele > 208 a 2 i C Start Date Completion Date HOME 1 1/11 12/31/11 Performance Indicator,-," 7", Annual Units HOPWA • Number of persons`receiving,'.. 30 Kent residents micro-enterprise development ',i assistance Local ID ��,�' Un Its'Upon Prior Year BG1114 , a .� Completion Funds Other Funding Total $25 000 The primary,purpose of'th'e project is to help: ❑ The Homeless X Low/Mod-Income persons ❑ Persons with HIV/AIDS ❑ Persons with Disabilities i Page 33 of 76 Jurisdiction's Name: City of Kent Priority Need: High: Housing Project Title: YWCA: Anita Vista Transitional Housing Description This project will provide transitional housing and case management services to homeless domestic violence survivors and their children. The purpose of this project is to provide service-enriched transitional housing with the goal of facilitating permanent housing, The sub-recipient expects to serve approximately 12 unduplicated households during the 2011 program year. Objective category: ❑ Suitable Living Environment 1„, X Decent Housing ❑ Economic Opportunity ' Outcome Category X Availability/Accessibility ❑ Affoi�dgbihty` �,ustamabilrty Location/Target Area: Kent, WA (Confidential,Location) Nqj�' ..� Objective Number Project�IDa Funding DH-1 Sources HUD Matrix Code CDBG Citation ; CDBG $25,000 05G Battered and Abused Spouses ..1' 570.201(e) Public services Type of Recipient CDBG,National ESG Private Non-profit Sub-recipient �,,Ob)ectivei Limited"Clien 'e( Start Date Completion Date HOME 1 1/11 12/31/11 Performance Indicator-N !� Annual�Untts HOPWA Number of households recetving"" 12 households housing and case mana ement "=`, i,,, Units Upon Prior Local ID > � BG1116`a a' °r� Completion Funds I�1 - Other Fundin Total 25 000 The primary}Ipurpose o`f°the project is to help: X The Homeless''= i.��z ❑ Low/Mod-Income Persons ❑ Persons with HIV/AIDS ❑ Persons with Disabilities Page 34 of 76 ATTACHMENT 4: 2011 CONSOLIDATED PLAN CERTIFICATIONS a f , i n °{4r Page 35 of 76 I 2011 CONSOLIDATED PLAN CERTIFICATIONS CERTIFICATIONS In accordance with statutes and the regulations governing Consolidated Plan regulations, the City of Kent certifies that: Affirmatively Further Fair Housing — The City of Kent will affirmatively further fair housing, conducting an analysis of impediments to fair housing choice within the jurisdiction, developing strategies and taking appropriate actions to overcome the effects of any impediments identified through the analysis, and maintaining records reflecting the analysis and actions taken to further the strategies and actions. Anti-displacement and Relocation Plan — TA City of Kerit-will comply with the acquisition and relocation requirements of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, as amended, and implementing regulations at 49 CFR%24r,,and ithas in effect and is following a residential anti-displacement and'relotation assistance plan required under section 104(d) of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, in connection with ahy, activity assisted with funding under the CDBG or HOME,'programs. Drug Free Workplace — The City of Kent�will continue to provide adrug- free workplace in accordance with the'Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988 (41 USC 701) by: _ y 1. Pub]ishingfstatement=notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture;udistributio`(fi,,,,dispensing, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibitedin the grantee's workplace and specifying the actions that will be taken against employees for ,violation of such prohibition; 2. ° � Maintaining an,ongoing drug-free awareness to inform employees about: (a) "The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace; (b) The grantee's policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace. (c) Available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance programs; and (d) The penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations occurring in the workplace; 3. Establishing a policy that each employee to be engaged in the performance of the grant be given a copy of the statement required by paragraph 1; 4. Notifying each employee in the statement required by paragraph 1 Page 36 of 76 that, as a condition of employment under the grant, the employee will: (a) Abide by the terms of the statement; and (b) Notify the employer in writing of his or her conviction for a violation of a criminal drug statute occurring in the workplace no later than five calendar days after such conviction; 5. Notifying HUD in writing, within ten calendar days after receiving notice under subparagraph 4(b) from an employee or otherwise receiving actual notice of such conviction. Employers-'" f convicted employees must provide notice, including position title, to every grant officer or other designee on whose grant actiyityl,the convicted employee was working, unless the Fed era l,agency,h;as, designated a central point for the receipt of such notice§:'�Notice shall include the identification number(s) of each affected grant. X 6. Taking one of the following actions, within 30 'calendar days of receiving notice under subparagraph 4(b), with respect to any employee who is so convicted: (a) Taking appropriate personnel-action against such an employee, up to and including termination, consistent with the requirements of the Rehabilitation Act,df 1973, as amended; or (b) Requiring such employee',to,participate satisfactorily in a drug abuse assistance or rehabilitation program approved for such purposes by a Federal, State,`or local health, law enforcement, or other appropriate agency; 7. Making"a goo'd,,faith!'6ffprt to continue to maintain a drug-free gl; orkplace through implementation of paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. 8. P"roVlding the street address, city, county, state and zip code for the site'1or sites where the performance of work in connection with the grant will take place. For functions carried out by employees in several departments or offices, more than one location will be specified. It is further recognized that sites may be added or changed during the course of grant-funded activities. The City of Kent will advise the HUD Field Office by submitting a revised Place of Performance form. The City of Kent recognizes that the period covered by this certification extends until all funds under the specific grant have been expended. Page 37 of 76 Anti-Lobbying — To the best of the City of Kent's knowledge and belief: t 1. No Federally appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of it, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement; v 2. If any funds other than Federal appropriated fdpds',have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or,atternpting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Con'dr6ss, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee,of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, it will complete and submit Standard Form-LLL;`x4, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying, ' in accordance with its instructions; and 3. It will require that the Ian'guge'_-of f,paragraph__ ]] and 2 of this anti- lobbying certification be inclined in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grants, loans,, and,'cooperative agreements) and that all subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly. krr� ^S.:e Page 38 of 76 Authority of Jurisdiction — The Consolidated Plan is authorized under State and local law (as applicable) and the City of Kent possesses the legal authority to carry out the programs for which it is seeking funding, in accordance with applicable HUD regulations. Consistency with plan — The housing activities to be undertaken with CDBG, HOME, ESG, and HOPWA funds are consistent with the strategic plan. Section 3 — It will comply with Section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968, and implementing regulations at 24 CFR Part 135. Signature/Authorized Official Date y Mayor Suzette Cooke APPROVED AS TO FORM: Kent Law Department , + a� f L ' �p[ f v E n Page 39 of 76 • Specific CDBG Certifications The City of Kent, as an Entitlement Community, certifies that: Citizen Participation — It is in full compliance and following a detailed citizen participation plan that satisfies the requirements of 24 CFR 91.105. Community Development Plan — Its consolidated housing and community development plan identifies community development and housing needs and specifies both short-term and long-term community development objectives that that have been developed in accordance with the primary objective of the statute authorizing the CDBG program, as describedln, 24 CFR 570.2 and 24 CFR, Part 570. Following the Consolidated Plan — It will follow the five year'Consolidated Plan as approved by HUD. _, � Use of Funds — It has complied with the following criteria: 1. Maximum Feasible Priorit),a',,With respect to activities expected to be assisted with CDBG funds,.the City of Kent certifies that it has developed its Action Plan so as to�giye,maximum feasible priority to activities which benefit low ands moderat6Jncome families or aid in the prevention or elimination of slum5or blight,The Action Plan may also include activities which the grantee certifies are designed to meet other community development needs having a particular urgency because existing conditions pose a-serious and immediate threat to the health or welfare of the community;'and other financial resources are not available to meet such needs; 2. v - `e i he'aggregate use of CDBG funds including section ans during program year 2010 shall principally o low and moderate income in a manner that ensures h ,p rcent of the amount is expended for activities that e r ns during the designated period; 3. s es ts. The City of Kent will not attempt to recover any blic improvements assisted with CDBG funds including Section 108 loan guaranteed funds by assessing any amount against properties owned and occupied by persons of low and moderate income, including any fee charged or assessment made as a condition of obtaining access to such public improvements. However, if CDBG funds are used to pay the proportion of a fee or assessment that relates to the capital costs of public improvements (assisted in part with CDBG funds) financed from other revenue sources, an assessment or charge may be made against the property with respect to the public improvements financed by a source other than CDBG Page 40 of 76 funds. Also, in the case of properties owned and occupied by moderate-income (but not low-income) families, an assessment or charge may be made against the property for public improvements financed by a source other than CDBG funds if the jurisdiction certifies that it lacks CDBG funds to cover the assessment Excessive Force — It has adopted and is enforcing: 1. A policy prohibiting the use of excessive force by law enforcement agencies within its jurisdiction against any individua'Is engaged in non- violent civil rights demonstrations; and lof 2. A policy of enforcing applicable State and local laws against physically barring entrance to or exit from a facility or location which is the subject of such non-violent civil rights demonstrations`within its jurisdiction; \4�N Compliance With Anti-discrimination laws — The grant will be conducted and administered in conformity with title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 USC 2000d), the Fair Housing Act (42 USC 3601-3619), and implementing regulations. 4 $f Lead-Based Paint — The City of Kent's notification, inspection, testing and abatement procedures concerning lead-based paiht,will comply with the requirements of 24 CFR'6 .608; Compliance with':Laws — It,Will comply"'With applicable laws. ld Signature/Authorized Official-,, Date Mayor Suzette Cooke APPROVED AS TO-FORM: Kent Law Department 1 Page 41 of 76 APPENDIX TO CERTIFICATIONS INSTRUCTIONS CONCERNING LOBBYING AND DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE REQUIREMENTS: A. Lobbying Certification This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by section 1352, title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure. B. Drug-Free Workplace Certification 1. By signing and/or submitting tlii5 apple, tion or grant agreement, the City of Kent is providing the certification. 2. The certification is a ;material represent ipn of fact upon which reliance is placed when ,the,angency awards the grant. If it is later determined that the grantee knowingly rendered,a-false certification, or otherwise violates the requirements"of the Drug-Free Workplace Act, HUD, in additiori"to any�6ther remedies available to the Federal Governiment, may take action authorized under the Drug- Free Workplace 'Act.' > , 3., "'Workplaces under grants, for grantees other than individuals, need,not be identified on the certification. If known, they may be identified in " the grant application. If the grantee does not identify the workplaces at the time of application, :or upon award, if there is no application, the grantee,must keep the identity of the workplace(s) on,file in its office and make the information available for Federal inspection. Failure to identify all known workplaces constitutes a violation of the grantee's drug-free workplace requirements. 4. Workplace identifications must include the actual address of buildings (or parts of buildings) or other sites where work under the grant takes place. Categorical descriptions may be used (e.g., all vehicles of a mass transit authority or State Page 42 of 76 i highway department while in operation, State employees in each local unemployment office, performers in concert halls or radio stations). 5. If the workplace identified to the agency changes during the performance of the grant, the grantee shall inform the HUD of the change(s), if it previously identified the workplaces in question (see paragraph three). 6. The grantee may insert in the space provided = " below the site(s) for the performance of work clone in connection with the specific grant: Place of Performance (Street address, city, county, state, zip code) i City of Kent 220 41h Avenue South Kent. WA 98032 Check — if there are workplaces9TR file that are not identified here. The certification with regard to the,qru`- fee workplace is required by 24 CFR, Part 24, Subpart F. 7. Definition's=oFterms in tli'e Mon-procurement Suspension and Debarment common rule and Drug-Free Workplace common rule apply to this certification. Grantees' attention is called,, in particular, to the following �Adefinitions.from these-rules: �� < "Contro`I�led"sub'ta_il �e" means a controlled substance in Schedules I through:V;pf the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C;:,812) and as futher defined by regulation (21 CFR 1308.1rthrough 1308.15); "Conviction" eansatfinding of guilt (including a plea of no/o contendre) orlm osition of sentence, or both, by any judicial body charged with'the responsibility to determine violations of the Federal or State criminal drug statutes; "Criminal drug statute" means a Federal or non-Federal criminal statute involving the manufacture, distribution, dispensing, use, or possession of any controlled substance; "Employee" means the employee of a grantee directly engaged in the performance of work under a grant, including: (I) All "direct charge" employees; (n) all "indirect charge" employees Page 43 of 76 @ @ unless their impac or involvement is b@gm§ant to the performance of the grant; and (ii) temporary personnel and @ consultants who are directly engaged in the performance of work under the grant and who are on the grantee's payroll. This definition does no include workers not on +e payroll of the @ grantee yGw volunteers, even ifusedto mega matching requirement; consultants or independent contractors not on the grantee's payroll; oremployees ofsubed@eysor . subcontractors w covered wow/ac g. /K�� � g��` y - ,i V +5 « � ' @ x . « <2 : S . , . . @ � @ 'z $ @ Page 4 of 76 . � ATTACHMENT 5: NOTICE OF PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD AND PUBLIC HEARING FOR CDBG 2011 ACTION PLAN i f e k��ytf i Iyi` }5 Yi yy R r Page 45 of 76 For Immediate Publication/Release September 17, 2010 `� KENT wesrvirvo*ex jPUBLIC NOTICE CITY OF KENT Department of Parks, Recreation & Community Services Human Services Division NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING In accordance with 24 CFR 91.105, notice`is;'hereby given that the City of Kent will hold a public hearing on October'212010 to receive comments regarding the City's 2011 Annual Action Plan�1,Comfnents will be received by the Kent Human Services Commission. The Annual Action Plan outlines the City's proposed use of 2011 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds awarded to the City by the U.S. Department'6f:Housing and Urban development (HUD) under Title 1 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 as amended, known as the Community Development Block Grant-(CDBG) Program. All interested persons are invited to comment on the 2011 Annual Action Plan at the public hearing and during the 30-day comment period. DATE/TIMEtiOF PIiBLIC HEARING Thursday,' October 21, 2010, 2:30 p.m. PLACE: 4th Floor, Centennial Center, Mountain View Conference Room, Suite,401, 400 W. Gowe St., Kent, WA 98032 Written comments Will be accepted and may be mailed, e-mailed, or faxed to. ilt Dinah Wilson, CDBG Program Coordinator City of Kent, 220 4th Ave. South, Kent, WA 98032 E-mail: drwilson(cbci.kent.wa.us Fax: 253-856-6070 A draft copy of the 2011 Annual Action Plan, as well as additional information about the public hearing can be found on the City's web site at the following address: http://www.ci.kent.wa.us/humanservices . In addition the Annual Action Plan may be examined at the following locations: Page 46 of 76 • Kent Clerk's Office, 220 4th Ave. South, Kent, WA 98032, 1st Floor • Kent Human Services Division, Kent City Hall Building, 220 41h Ave. South, Kent, WA 98032, 3rd Floor ADA Information: , This notice is available in alternate formats for individuals with disabilities upon request. The Centennial Center is wheelchair accessible. Reasonable accommodations at the public hearing such as sign language interpretation or alternate formats for printed material are available for individuals with disabilities with a minimum of 7 days advance notice. Please call (253) 856- 5070 directly or: • For TDD call (253) 856-5499 • For Braille Relay Service call 1-800-83376385 • For Hearing Impaired Relay Service call 1-,800-833-6388 Jeff Watling, Director Kent Parks, Recreation & Community`SeI° fifes Signature `` . Date ,<<` "k�b 7, -T�, f' Page 47 of 76 r $ ATTACHMENT 6: October 21, 2010 PUBLIC HEARING $ COMMENTS @ �( \ . > :y \ � \ � \\ ilo ,w g, ƒy ! \� J/ z § \ @ � � @ � @ Pap 4 of 7 � � r �w . - , n}f' � 1«psi_ �r ` 333ej 41 x Bb�ii ` Page 49 of 76 r @ ATTACHMENT 7: October 21, 2010 PARKS & HUMAN SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES (CONSIDERATION OF 2011 FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS) � " \\WT « \ d§ � ` Mh ^ . /» §^: � @ . @ Page 50 J7 � i o ��t •le eke `Rq v 1 ✓ 4f~a r Page 51 of 76 ATTACHMENT 8: November 3, 2009 MINUTES OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUTHORIZING FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS AND SUBMITTAL OF CERTIFICATIONS I 4�1 Al Fit A tW ,Nq ld st Page 52 of 76 ��.G Wv 1 k x i Page 53 of 76 In,� W, , > \\ � ` \ Page 5 of 7 ATTACHMENT 9: EVIDENCE OF INSURANCE COVERAGE A� a��g ry i I.Q. 'Pn ` 05, { p �z Page 56 of 76 Al � � ^\\� » � � Page 55 of 76 � Insert insurance coverage @ � @ ' ^ � d � \® , -Apf ` @ \ ��2 � ^ \ AN � , @ ^ � @ � � � . � Page 5 R 7 @ � APPENDIX A: ANTI-POVERTY STRATEGIES � � � < / . %« \/ ^ �\ � lk ,*w ift y ~ y } b \ G © � � � Page 58 9 7 � ANTI-POVERTY STRATEGIES ' BACKGROUND , Poverty is an issue facing almost 12% of Kent's residents, a rate some 50% higher than King County as a whole. Although the City of Kent is a strong hub for business development and transportation to other areas providing job opportunities, rising unemployment rates caused by the current downward trend of the economy are forcing many employers to downsge. The number of young and fragile families, often with one or more children, is growing. The TANF Program, with work mandates, is putting more people into the work force in low-paying jobs. The roots of poverty;stem from the lack of living wage jobs, but are exacerbated by high housing arid,basic living costs, personal and family dysfunction and the special needs of many persons in the community. M F�4 Among the more expensive items for families to mairlI6in are housing and ' utility costs, child care and transportation. The current, tenuous state of the human service infrastructure is creating further strain on low- and moderate-income people seeking ,or,trying to maintain employment. The City's anti-poverty strategy focuses o`n`,reducing the high cost of basic human needs while seeking innovative solutiorn to increasing basic income and the provision of supportive services. � DECREASE HOUSING COSTS OF L'OW- AND MODERATE- INCOME PERSONS The City will provide grants of up-to $5,000 through its Home Repair Program (HRP) to help low- and moderate-income homeowners make necessary repairs f6r'he61th -safety, weatherization and housing preservation. The HRP will also provide health and safety assistance to disabled and elderly renters. A $10,000 biannual CDBG grant to Kent Fire and Life Safety provides free ' smoke detectors and installation of handicap accessibility items for homeowners and renters with special needs. In addition, the city-will continue to encourage low- and moderate-income households requiring a higher level of weatherization services to apply to the King County Weatherization Program and the King County Housing ' Authority Rental Rehabilitation Program. These critical programs reduce the economic burden of homeownership, as well as provide weatherization assistance. In many cases, the improvements reduce clients' energy bills. A key part of the strategy is to provide a range of housing at affordable levels. Affordable rental assistance is provided to over 3,000 low- and moderate-income Kent households through the King County Housing Authority and other sponsors of the Section 8 rental assistance program. The City supports the provision of additional vouchers for low- and moderate- ' Page 59 of 76 income persons paying more than affordable rents. ' For persons without housing or at-risk of eviction or displacement, Kent area homeless providers offer a continuum of housing and services in a cooperative effort through the Seattle/King County Continuum of Care, the ' South King Council of Human Services and the South King County Homeless Alliance. The City, in cooperation with other jurisdictions and providers will continue to pursue effective solutions to ongoing issues affecting individuals and families at or below 80% of the median income. To the greatest extent possible, the City will maintain the Human Services General, Fund budget, providing over $800,000 annually in funding for vital, basi, „needs human services programs. .` .� Staff of other City departments will continue to ser,0�,�as',Bbard Members for local agencies providing critical services to lovi-`and moderate-income residents. In addition, staff and elected officials will remain involved with local service clubs that provide financial support to local providers for special projects involving housing and human services._ �i,��ai1 . ,¢� - The City will continue to work regionally and s' b-i"egionally, in collaboration ' with other funders, including the King County HOME Consortium, the King County Housing Authority Weatherization Program, the South King County fl Planners group, as well as various humaniservice provider groups to coordinate common housing and human serVice�goals. SEEK MEANS TO PROVIDE AFFORDABLE CJHILD CARE TO LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME FAMILIES King County Y Housing';4 thq rit :has programs that help residents reduce .9� ;. barriers to full employmeht;'e.g.; affordable child care. Efforts will include working with businesses toyexpand employer participation in child care programs; offering off-hour child care serving employees; maximizing the use of,State child care assistance for low- and moderate-income families; and, advocating for increased State ECEAP funding levels. SEEK IMPROVED PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SERVICES AND ' JOB ACCESSIBILITY IN SOUTH KING COUNTY The City provides a Shopper's Shuttle that assists individuals to access ' shopping, services and employment. It is expected that this service will be maintained and possibly expanded to offer access to employment centers throughout the day and during targeted off-hour shifts. Metro bus service ' was improved, and the City will seek additional improvement, especially east-west routes, in conjunction with current and future expanded schedules of the Sounder Commuter Rail Service running North/South. The City of Kent ' and other Kent employers are actively involved in the Commute Trip Page 60 of 76 Reduction Program. It is expected that the state-mandated program will , continue. INCREASE INCOMES OF PERSONS IN NEED City of Kent staff will work closely with providers and case managers offering ' homeless housing and services in Kent, assisting clients with information, advocacy and job application assistance to maximize their benefits from , programs for which they are eligible. In addition, programs serving the homeless and other low- and moderate-income persons are increasingly skilled at providing clients with a range of services designed to meet their ' particular needs, including job skills training, job retention skills, job referral and counseling. Future funding within the timeframe of the plan could include services provided on an advocacy-base&model, aimed at ongoing assistance with specific basic needs to increase job retention, employee skills development and helping consumers progress toward earning a living wage. F .,' 1Z 16' Page 61 of 76 � APPENDIX B: NEEDS OF PUBLIC HOUSING � � \ � �Z d - ( \ . \O : , � \/ , \\ \ «am \ \ +IT- ` J » AIN . . 2� 1® 2 � � � � Page 62 7 7 � NEEDS OF PUBLIC HOUSINGS The King County Housing Authority (KCHA) operates Birch Creek ' Apartments (formerly Springwood Apartments), Valli-Kee Homes, and the Mardi Gras Apartments in Kent. The City of Kent works closely with KCHA. The City refers low-income residents for public housing, connects , funded agencies and other local agencies to KCHA, promotes the collaboration between funded programs and KCHA, and worked with KCHA to shape the redesign of Birch Creek Apartments in order to streamline ' operations and to contribute to the economic self-sufficiency of residents. In 2006, the City provided CDBG funds to renovate the Springwood Apartments Youth Center. , A variety of services are provided at Birch Cregk Apartf%ents. Services include, but are not limited to the following: `�� �e o An after-school program is provided by Kent Youth\a�d\Family Services; :. , o Recreational programs F ' o A computer center for youth o Employment programs provided by the Center for Career Alternatives; o Head Start o The WIC program and; o An on-site food bank. _ Due to age and ph"ysical` distress, the Birch Creek Apartments underwent major financial,,and phys�ca,l restructuring. The $55 million revitalization has been completed and the transformation is dramatic. In place of the dingy, densely-packed and'box,like buildings of the former Springwood Apartments stands�a'vi' rant, nevi,'community with a central park, multiple outdoor recreation spaces, and cheerful, energy-efficient apartment homes with pitched roofs and patios. The redeveloped campus is bookended by two state=of`the-art community centers that serve the ' needs of Birch Creek families and the greater Kent community. The project utilized an innovative financing structure that leveraged both ' investor equity and long-term debt. A similar approach is now being proposed by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development for use by housing authorities across the country. In FY2007, KCHA received ' HUD approval to dispose of the property to a Tax Credit limited partnership or limited liability company controlled by KCHA. The property was decommissioned as public housing and sale proceeds were used to ' leverage other federal, state, local and private financing to undertake necessary renovations. Low-income units that were removed have been replaced on a one-for-one basis and a total of 262 families are now ' 9 Megan Farley Hyla, King County Housing Authority, Director of Policy and Intergovernmental Affairs, updated this section. ' Page 63 of 76 ' housed at the complex. ' The project, which is enrolled as a 4-Star Built Green TM project, increases the energy efficiency of the existing structures, reduces utility bills of residents, and enhances environmentally sensitive areas on the site, ' including Soosette Creek, the salmon-bearing stream that bisects the property. The Built Green scale measures the environmental sustainability of development projects. It was developed by the Master Builders ' Association in partnership with King County, Snohomish County, and other Washington agencies. When the certification process is completed, Birch Creek will be the only 4-Star Built GreenT"' affordable housing project of its kind. n, Al Ilk " a "`y tAP x5rwti v i ,at " tit�:z Page 64 of 76 APPENDIX C: FAIR HOUSING Ilk- IM 4 Page 65 of 76 ' FAIR HOUSING The City continues to monitor compliance with the Fair Housing Act and to respond appropriately to alleged violations; complaints are referred to the Washington State Human Rights Commission for resolution. In 2004, the City hired a consultant and its first Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice (AI) as a direct entitlement City was completed in 2005. ' The Fair Housing Consultant identified three impediments and made two recommendations which fall under the City's authority: Impediments Impediment I: Housing discrimination primarily t�ffects persons of color, immigrants, the disabled, and families/w,ith children. Impediment II: Seattle King County Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) lending institutions deny more/loans to African Americans and Hispanics. Impediment III: The public at large' 1h'as limited knowledge of protected classes and fair housing laws and,the resources available to them. j' �� � Sli Recommendations to Respond to Findings to Impediments to Fair Housing „ IQ The Fair Housing Consultant°;identified three impediments and made two recommendations' which fall under the City's authority. The two recommendations were: 4- Expand current ed, ucation and°toureach efforts; and • Target homeownership and lending marketing to African American and Hispanic household' Irt'response to the finding,F`the City did the following to expand education and outreach efforts' • Created a Fair Housing pamphlet entitled Fair Housing — It's Your Right which can be downloaded from the City's web site • Distributed fair housing informational materials, which are available in several languages, at City-sponsored crime prevention training, resource fairs, and financial literacy events • Inserted Fair Housing articles in City publications For the purpose of targeting homeownership and lending marketing to African American and Hispanic households, the City will meet with lenders (including a local Hispanic-owned bank) and explore ways to collaborate to increase homeownership and lending to African American and Hispanic residents Page 66 of 76 � - Expand current eduction and outreach efforts; and - Target homeownership and lending marketing to African American and Hispanic households. � \ \ � 4 «S « : � @ � Page p y7 � APPENDIX D: MONITORING 41'0 i� t Lam$ „ S �'P lio Page 68 of 76 MONITORING ' Standards and Procedures for Monitoring The City monitors its CDBG program throughout the year to ensure that , activities are in compliance with City and federal regulations, including an assessment of compliance with national objectives and activity eligibility. Programs funded by the City are expected to maintaimihigh standards. Organizations are informed that the failure to comply with contractual requirements and regulations could result in remedial actions and/or the , termination of funding. Quarterly performance reports are reviewed by the Kent Human Services Commission. Standards and procedures are further outlined below; • Staff meets with newly funded projects before and/or during the contract year: Projects are monitored closely to ensure that staff has a good understanding of program administration, program performance standards, fiscal administration, contractual requirements, and recordkeeping and reporting.-'Issues that need clarification are addressed. , • At a minimum,-all'projeicts receive quarterly monitoring. Programs that need guidance in,jachieving performance measures or adhering to contractual4dquiremelifs receive technical assistance, are required to attend a meeting with', y;staff;,,and/or receive an on-site monitoring visit. During th`e,f_ormal monitoring process, the provider agency's administrative structure is examined along with administrative policies and procedures to ensure compliance with regulations. A detailed e , contract monitoring checklist is completed and forwarded to agencies, , along with recommendations for improvements and needed follow-up. • Monitoring concerns/finding are reviewed with agency staff and , documented in writing. • When applicable, corrective action is required on a timely basis. Additional time for corrective action may be allowed on a case-by-case basis. • Agencies are required to provide supporting documentation verifying that deficiencies have been corrected. • Failure to take corrective action could lead to the withholding or the , loss of funding to a sub-recipient. Page 69 of 76 , ' APPENDIX E: POLICIES 1 1 h x SS:a 1 Page 70 of 76 POLICIES Agencies applying for CDBG funds are required to respond to general and program specific polices in their applications. All projects are evaluated to determine if they are: 1. Eligible relative to federal guidelines; 2. Consistent with the program objectives and strategies; , .A 3. Consistent with local, state and federal regulations"; 4. Feasible within contract and timeline guidelm'01"'6nd 5. Capable of developing and measuring outcomes. These policies include, among others: , • Consistency with local codes and policies; ` • Restrictions on the change" 'use of property-and buildings which were acquired or improved with CDBG,Ifunds; 41F • Minimization of displaceffi nt and they provision of relocation ' assistance; • Adherence to federal wage rates; • Compliance-with federal audit,requirements; and • Adhereri 1;to arid - enforcement of lead-based paint abatement regulations;1�air housing laws and affirmative action. ;z Page 71 of 76 � APPENDIX F: FISCAL AUDITS @ � @ : - « - � w ƒ — N « 2 § I&OP fniff > \K � @ � � Page 7 y7 � 1 FISCAL AUDITS , The City conducts an internal audit to ensure that its records are complete and agencies are complying with applicable rules and regulations. In addition, the City's records are subject to an independent annual audit. , The auditor tested the City's compliance with the following CDBG requirements: • Political Activity; • Davis-Bacon and Related Acts; • Civil rights; , ,4" • Cash Management; • Federal Financial Reports; • Allowable Costs & Cost Principles; \ t • Drug-Free Workplace Act; and • Various administrative re uirements,,, wit. t , ii ��h, Page 73 of 76 S APPENDIX G: LEAD-BASED PAINT HAZARDS 4 P'll Aw I'M JmN I":+U, ot AT Page 74 of 76 LEAD-BASED PAINT HAZARDS City of Kent home repair staff is trained in Safe Work Practices and presumes the presence of lead on repairs to housing built prior to 1978, meaning that safety measures are in place. Kent home repair staff has access to certified risk assessment inspectors when needed. In addition, the City identifies and , mitigates the source of lead in Kent homes by: • Assuring that all homeowners served by the Home Repair Program receive and comprehend the Lead Based Paint informational materials; • Assuring that Home Repair staff use the Lead-Safe Housing Rule Checklist for General Compliance Documentation as a guide to verify compliance with lead-based paint rules and that a Lead-Safe Housing Rule Applicability Form is completed on every Home Repair client; and • Assuring adherence to and enforcement of lead-based ,paint abatement , regulations. y/ �y Zr 3 A � A � Y Page 75 of 76 APPLICATION FOR OMB Approval No 0348-0043 ` FEDERAL ASSISTANCE 2.DATE SUBMITTED Applicant Identifier September 29, 2010 DUNS #' 02-025-3613 1 TYPE OF SUBMISSION 3.DATE RECEIVED BY STATE State Application Identifier A placation Preapplication []Construction ❑construction 4.DATE RECEIVED BY FEDERAL AGENCY Federal Identifier 0 Non-Construction ❑ Non-construction 5 APPLICANT INFORMATION Legal Name Organizational Unit City of Kent Parks, Recreation & Community Serv. Address(give city, county,State,and zip code) Name and telephone number of person to be contacted on mailers involvin e S this application(give area code) 220 4th Av Kent, WA Katherin Johnson, 253-856-5073 6 EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER(EIN) 7.TYPE OF APPLICANT:(enterappropnate letter in box) JF1 —©[_o]7 1 T2 F5 A State H Independent School Dist 8 TYPE OF APPLICATION B County I State Controlled Institution of Higher Learning ❑New m Continuation ❑Revision C Municipal J Private University D Township K Indian Tribe If Revision,enter appropriate letter(s)in box(es) ❑ E Interstate L Individual F Intermunicipal M Profit Organization A Increase Award B Decrease Award C Increase Duration G Special District N Other(Specify) D Decrease Duration Other(specify) 9.NAME OF FEDERAL AGENCY. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) 10 CATALOG OF FEDERAL DOMESTIC ASSISTANCE NUMBER. 11.DESCRIPTIVE TITLE OF APPLICANT'S PROJECT 1 4 — 2 1 8 CDBG Entitlement Grant TITLE CDBG Entitlement Grant 12 AREAS AFFECTED BY PROJECT(Cities, Counties,States,etc) City of Kent, King County, Washington State 13 PROPOSED PROJECT 14.CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS OF: Start Date Ending Date a Applicant b Protect 111/11 12/31/11 8th Congressional Dist/9th Congressional Dist Same 15 ESTIMATED FUNDING: 16 IS APPLICATION SUBJECT TO REVIEW BY STATE EXECUTIVE ORDER 12372 PROCESS? a Federal $ 00 848,557 a YES THIS PREAPPLICATI 0 N/APPLI CATION WAS MADE b Applicant $ 00 AVAILABLE TO THE STATE EXECUTIVE ORDER 12372 PROCESS FOR REVIEW ON c State $ 00 DATE d Local $ 00 b No ® PROGRAM IS NOT COVERED BY E 0 12372 e Other $ 00 ❑OR PROGRAM HAS NOT BEEN SELECTED BY STATE f Program Income $ 00 FOR REVIEW 17.IS THE APPLICANT DELINQUENT ON ANY FEDERAL DEBT? g TOTAL $ 00 848,557 ❑Yes It"Yes,"attach an explanation ❑No 18 TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF,ALL DATA IN THIS APPLICATION/PREAPPLICATION ARE TRUE AND CORRECT,THE DOCUMENT HAS BEEN DULY AUTHORIZED BY THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE APPLICANT AND THE APPLICANT WILL COMPLY WITH THE ATTACHED ASSURANCES IF THE ASSISTANCE IS AWARDED a Type Name of Authorized Representative b Title c Telephone Number Suzette Cooke Mayor (253)856-5700 1 d Signature of Authorized Representative a Date Signed Previous Edition Usable Standard Form 424(Rev 7-97) Authorized for Local Reproduction Prescnbed by OMB Circular A-102 INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE SF-424 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 45 minutes per response, including time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information Send comments regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden,to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project(0348-0043),Washington, DC 20503 PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET. SEND IT TO THE ADDRESS PROVIDED BY THE SPONSORING AGENCY. This is a standard form used by applicants as a required facesheet for preapplications and applications submitted for Federal assistance It , will be used by Federal agencies to obtain applicant certification that States which have established a review and comment procedure in response to Executive Order 12372 and have selected the program to be included in their process,have been given an opportunity to review the applicant's submission. Item. Entry Item* Entry, 1. Self-explanatory. 12 List only the largest political entities affected(e g, State, counties, cities) 2. Date application submitted to Federal agency(or State if applicable)and applicant's control number(if applicable) 13. Self-explanatory 3. State use only(if applicable) 14 List the applicant's Congressional District and any District(s)affected by the program or project 4. If this application is to continue or revise an existing award, enter present Federal identifier number If for a new protect, 15 Amount requested or to be contributed during the first leave blank. funding/budget period by each contributor Value of in- kind contributions should be included on appropriate 5. Legal name of applicant, name of primary organizational unit lines as applicable If the action will result in a dollar ' which will undertake the assistance activity,complete address of change to an existing award,indicate onl the amount the applicant,and name and telephone number of the person to of the change. For decreases, enclose the amounts in contact on matters related to this application parentheses If both basic and supplemental amounts are included,show breakdown an an attached sheet , 6. Enter Employer Identification Number(EIN)as assigned by the For multiple program funding, use totals and show Internal Revenue Service breakdown using same categories as item 15 7 Enter the appropriate letter in the space provided 16 Applicants should contact the State Single Point of Contact(SPOC)for Federal Executive Order 12372 to 8 Check appropriate box and enter appropriate letter(s)in the determine whether the application is subject to the space(s)provided State intergovernmental review process , —"New"means a new assistance award. 17. This question applies to the applicant organization, not the person who signs as the authorized representative , —"Continuation"means an extension for an additional Categories of debt include delinquent audit funding/budget period for a project with a projected disallowances, loans and taxes completion date. 18 To be signed by the authorized representative of the —"Revision"means any change in the Federal applicant A copy of the governing body's Government's financial obligation or contingent authorization for you to sign this application as official liability from an existing obligation representative must be on file in the applicant's office (Certain Federal agencies may require that this 9. Name of Federal agency from which assistance is being authorization be submitted as part of the application) requested with this application. 10 Use the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance number and title of the program under which assistance is requested 11 Enter a brief descriptive title of the project If more than one i program is involved,you should append an explanation on a separate sheet If appropriate(e g,construction or real property projects), attach a map showing project location For preapplications, use a separate sheet to provide a summary SF-424(Rev 7-97)Back description of this project ' Kent City Council Meeting Date November 2, 2010 Category Consent Calendar - 7F 1. SUBJECT: RECREATION AND CONSERVATION OFFICE AGREEMENT AMENDMENT FOR MATINJUSSI/VAN DYKE PROPERTY ACQUISITIONS - AUTHORIZE 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Accept an additional $298,127.06 in grant funds, amend the budget, authorize expenditure of the funds associated with the Panther Lake Acquisitions, and authorize the Mayor to sign the Recreation Conservation Office grant agreement amendment and all other related documents, subject to final terms and conditions approved by the City Attorney. The original grant agreement from the Recreation Conservation Office (RCO) partially funded the acquisitions in the Panther Lake area. This amendment, combined with other grant funds, will fully fund both the Matinjussi and Van Dyke property acquisitions. 3. EXHIBITS: Agreement Amendment 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Parks & Human Services Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? X Revenue? X 1 Currently in the Budget? Yes No X 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Y WASHINGTON STATE Recreation and Conservation Office Amendment to Project Agreement Project Sponsor: Kent Parks, Rec&Comm Sery Project Number: 08-1354A Protect Title Matinjussi Panther Lake Acquisition Amendment Number: 1 Amendment Type: Cost Change Amendment Description: With the availability of additional Washington Wildlife and Recreation Program funds,the Project Agreement referenced above is amended to Increase the grant amount by$298,127 06 for a total grant of$834,242 06 for this partially funded project $279,342 44 came from the 2007-2009 biennium and $18,784 62 came from the 2009-2011 biennium Project Funding: The total cost of the project for the purpose of this Agreement changes as follows- Old Amount New Amount Amount % Amount % RCO-WWRP-WA $536,115 00 49.93% $834,242 06 49 93% Project Sponsor $537,618 00 50 07% $836,580 42 50 07% Total Project Cost $1,073,73300 100% $1,670,82248 100% Adman Limit $0 00 0 00% $0 00 0.00% A&E Limit $0 00 0.00% $0 00 0.00% LAgreement Terms In all other respects the Agreement, to which this is an Amendment, and attachments thereto, shall ' remain in full force and effect In witness whereof the parties hereto have executed this Amendment. State Of Washington Kent Parks, Rec& Comm Sery ' Recreation and Conservation Office AGENCY: BY: BY: Kaleen Cottinqham TITLE: Director TITLE: DATE: ' DATE: Pre-approved as to form. BY, /S/ Assistant Attorney General WWRP Project Cost Change Amendment: Outdoor Recreation Account Chanter 79A 15 RCW Chanter 286 WAC AMENAGRIRPT Kent City Council Meeting Date November 2, 2010 Category Consent Calendar - 7G 1. SUBJECT: CONSULTANT AGREEMENT WITH NORTHWEST HYDRAULIC CONSULTANTS FOR FOSTER PARK AND HORSESHOE BEND LEVEE IMPROVEMENTS - AUTHORIZE 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Authorize the Mayor to sign Amendment No. 1 to the Consultant Services Agreement between the City of Kent and Northwest Hydraulic Consultants in an amount not to exceed $14,975 for the purpose of responding to comments from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for certification of the Foster Park and Horseshoe Bend levees. FEMA has completed its initial review of the Conditional Letters of Map Revision (CLOMR) that the City provided to them in August 2010. Northwest Hydraulic Consultants assisted in the preparation of the original application to FEMA. This contract is for the preparation of additional information to respond to FEMA's requests. i3. EXHIBITS: Public Works Memorandum dated 10/14/10 and Consultant Services Agreement Amendment No. 1 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? X Revenue? Currently in the Budget? Yes X No 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ' Timothy ]. LaPorte P E , Public Works Director • Phone 253-856-5500 Fax- 253-856-6500 KENT w^5~I N G T 0" Address: 220 Fourth Avenue S Kent, WA 98032-5895 Date: October 14, 2010 To: Chair Debbie Raplee and Public Works Committee Members PW Committee Meeting Date: October 18, 2010 From: Mark Madfai, P.E., Design Engineering Supervisor Through: Timothy J LaPorte, P.E., Public Works Director Subject: Consultant Services Agreement—Northwest Hydraulic Consultants Foster Park and Horseshoe Bend Levee Improvements Motion: Move to recommend Council authorize the Mayor to sign Amendment No. 1 to the Consultant Services Agreement between the City of Kent and Northwest Hydraulic Consultants in an amount not to exceed $14,925 for the purpose of responding to comments from the Federal Emergency Management Agency for certification of the Foster Park and Horseshoe Bend levees, upon concurrence of the language therein by the City Attorney and the Public Works Director. Summary: On August 31, 2010 the City of Kent submitted Conditional Letters of Map Revision (CLOMR) and supporting documentation to the Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA) to certify the Foster Park and Horseshoe Bend Levees. FEMA has completed its initial review and has provided the City with comments and a request for additional information. Northwest Hydraulic Consultants, along with GeoEngineers, prepared the original application to FEMA and this contract is for Northwest Hydraulic Consultants to prepare the additional work to respond to FEMA's comments. Budget Impact: This work will be reimbursed using the $10,000,000 grant from the Washington Department of Ecology for Horseshoe Bend/Foster Park levee certification. KENT W PSnNGTON AMENDMENT NO. 1 NAME OF CONSULTANT OR VENDOR: Northwest Hydraulic Consultants Inc. CONTRACT NAME & PROJECT NUMBER: Horseshoe Bend Levee ORIGINAL AGREEMENT DATE: January 25, 2010 This Amendment is made between the City and the above-referenced Consultant or Vendor and amends the original Agreement and all prior Amendments. All other provisions of the original Agreement or prior Amendments not inconsistent with this Amendment shall remain in full force and effect. For valuable consideration and by mutual consent of the parties, Consultant or Vendor's work is modified as follows: 1. Section I of the Agreement, entitled "Description of Work," is hereby modified to add additional work or revise existing work as follows: In addition to work required under the original Agreement and any prior Amendments, the Consultant or Vendor shall: Conduct additional analyses and mapping to support the City's CLOMR applications for certification of the Horseshoe Bend and Foster Park Levees. 2. The contract amount and time for performance provisions of Section II "Time of Completion," and Section III, "Compensation," are modified as follows: Original Contract Sum, $22,253.00 including applicable WSST Net Change by Previous Amendments $0 I including applicable WSST Current Contract Amount $22,253.00 including all previous amendments Current Amendment Sum $14,975.00 Applicable WSST Tax on this $0 Amendment Revised Contract Sum $37,228.00 i t AMENDMENT - 1 OF 2 Original Time for Completion 12/31/10 (insert date) Revised Time for Completion under 0 prior Amendments (insert date) Add'I Days Required (t) for this 0 calendar days Amendment Revised Time for Completion 12/31/10 (insert date) The Consultant or Vendor accepts all requirements of this Amendment by signing below, by its signature waives any protest or claim it may have regarding this Amendment, and acknowledges and accepts that this Amendment constitutes full payment and final settlement of all claims of any kind or nature arising from or connected with any work either covered or affected by this Amendment, including, without limitation, claims related to contract time, contract acceleration, onsite or home office overhead, or lost profits. This Amendment, unless otherwise provided, does not relieve the Consultant or Vendor from strict compliance with the guarantee and warranty provisions of the original Agreement. All acts consistent with the authority of the Agreement, previous Amendments (if any), and this Amendment, prior to the effective date of this Amendment, are hereby ratified and affirmed, and the terms of the Agreement, previous Amendments (if any), and this Amendment shall be deemed to have applied. The parties whose names appear below swear under penalty of perjury that they are authorized to enter into this Amendment, which is binding on the parties of this contract. IN WITNESS, the parties below have executed this Amendment, which will become effective on the last date written below. CONSULTANT/VENDOR: CITY OF KENT: By: By: , (signature) (signature) Print Name: Print Name: Suzette Cooke Its Its Mayor (title) (title) DATE: DATE: APPROVED AS TO FORM: (applicable if Mayor's signature required) j Kent Law Department NHC-Horseshoe Bend Amd 7/Mad+ar AMENDMENT - 2 OF 2 EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF WORK AMENDMENT 1 —ADDITIONAL ANALYSIS AND MAPPING FOR GREEN RIVER LEVEE CERTIFICATION CLOMRS DESCRIPTION OF WORK/ PROJECT OBJECTIVES The objective of this contract is to conduct additional analyses and mapping to support the City of Kent's CLOMR applications for certification of the Horseshoe Bend Perimeter levee and the Foster Park setback levee along the Green River. LOCATION OF WORK SITE The geographic extent of the Green River reach to be analyzed includes the right bank and associated overbank floodplain of the Lower Green River study area from just upstream of State Route 167 to the upstream side of Horseshoe Bend This area is contained within the HEC- RAS and FLO-2D models previously developed by NHC for King County and the USACE- the study reach extends from approximately RM 23.75 to RM 26. TASKS ITEMS AND WORK PRODUCTS NHC shall furnish all services and labor necessary to complete the following tasks Task 1 — Respond to Reviewer Comments and Provide Additional Support Materials for Horseshoe Bend CLOMR resubmittal In response to the City's CLOMR submittal for the Horseshoe Bend Levee Certification FEMA's technical reviewer requested additional supporting data, clarification, and mapping beyond that which was originally scoped for the Horseshoe Bend CLOMR Support Project Specifically the reviewer requested additional supporting documentation and modeling, clarification of data submitted, and detailed annotated FIRM maps and Work maps for the affected floodplain areas. NHC will participate in discussions and teleconferences with the City and the City's other consultants (TetraTech, GeoEngineers) and FEMA to clarify the data that needs to be provided in a CLOMR resubmittal. NHC will produce annotated FIRMs and site specific Work Maps for the area protected by the Horseshoe Bend Perimeter levee for inclusion in the City's Horseshoe Bend CLOMR resubmittal The attached budget assumes that the basis of comparison for the mapping is the 2010 King County Appeal of the FEMA DFIRM and NOT the 1989 effective Green River Flood Insurance Study (FIS) Deliverables: ■ Responses and/or additional data as requested by FEMA's CLOMR reviewer in its 9/20/2010 letter to GeoEngineers ■ Annotated Work Map for area affected by the Horseshoe Bend CLOMR ■ Annotated FIRM for the area affected by the Horseshoe Bend CLOMR Task 2 —Respond to Reviewer Comments and Provide Additional Support Materials for Foster Park CLOMR resubmittal iIn response to the City's CLOMR submittal for the Foster Park Levee Certification FEMA's technical reviewer requested additional supporting data, clarification, and mapping beyond that which was originally scoped for the Foster Park CLOMR Support Project Specifically the reviewer requested additional supporting documentation and modeling, clarification of data submitted, and detailed annotated FIRM maps and Work maps for the affected floodplain areas. NHC will participate in discussions and teleconferences with the City and the City's other Green River Levee Certification Amendment 1 October 11, 2010 consultants (TetraTech, GeoEngmeers) and FEMA to clarify the data that needs to be provided in a CLOMR resubmittal NHC will produce annotated FIRMS and site specific Work Maps for the area protected by the Foster Park levee for inclusion in the City's Foster Park CLOMR resubmittal The attached budget assumes that the basis of comparison for the mapping is the 2010 King County Appeal of the FEMA DFIRM and NOT the 1989 effective Green River Flood Insurance Study (FIS) Deliverables: • Responses and/or additional data as requested by FEMA's CLOMR reviewer in its 9/20/2010 letter to GeoEngineers , ■ Annotated Work Map for area affected by the Foster Park CLOMR r Annotated FIRM for the area affected by the Foster Park CLOMR t i t i 1 I 1 1 t t Green River Levee Certification Amendment 2 October 11, 2010 Northwest Hydraulic Consultants Inc. Estimate of Professional Services 16300 Christensen Road, Suite 350 Prepared for: City of Kent Seattle,WA 98188-3418 Protect: Amendment 1 —Additional Analysis And Mapping For Green River Levee Tel. (206) 241-6000 Certification CLOMRs Fax(206)439-2420 Date: 10/11/2010 Prepared By: Larry Karpack ' Staff Hours IASK UtJC;KIVIIVN 1 Task 1 Horseshoe Bend CLOMR Resubmittai Support 8 16 24 4 $7,425 Task 2 Foster Park CLOMR Resubmittal Support 8 16 24 4 $7,425 Total Hours and Direct Labor Cost(DL) 16 0 S20 0 0 480 8 0 Total Labor Rate ($/hr) 45 $170 7 5 5 45 $ 79.84 TOTAL LABOR COST $14,850 Direct Expense Detail Units Rate cost Mileage 50 0505 Reproduction, Couriers, & Communication $100 ' 5 Cost Summary Total Labor $14,850 Total Direct Expenses $125 EP 4, 75 Kent City Council Meeting Date November 2, 2010 1 Category Consent Calendar - 7H 1. SUBJECT: CONSULTANT AGREEMENT WITH GEOENGINEERS FOR FOSTER PARK AND HORSESHOE BEND LEVEE IMPROVEMENTS - AUTHORIZE 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Authorize the Mayor to sign Amendment No. 2 to the Consultant Services Agreement between the City of Kent and GeoEngineers, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $33,040 for the purpose of responding to comments from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for certification of the Foster Park and Horseshoe Bend levees. FEMA has completed its initial review of the Conditional Letters of Map Revision (CLOMR) that the City provided to them in September 2010 GeoEngineers, Inc. assisted in the preparation of the original application to FEMA. This contract is for the preparation of additional information to respond to FEMA's requests as well as the design work for the proposed improvements to Horseshoe Bend that may be necessary for levee certification. 3. EXHIBITS: Public Works Memorandum dated 10/14/10 and Consultant Services Agreement Amendment No 2 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? X Revenue? Currently in the Budget? Yes X No 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: jCouncilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Timothy J. LaPorte P E., Public Works Director • Phone• 253-856-5500 Fax: 253-856-6500 KENT "• ^'° °" Address• 220 Fourth Avenue S. Kent, WA 98032-5895 Date: October 14, 2010 To: Chair Debbie Raplee and Public Works Committee Members PW Committee Meeting Date: October 18, 2010 From: Mark Madfai, P.E., Design Engineering Supervisor Through: Timothy J. LaPorte, P.E., Public Works Director Subject: Consultant Services Agreement - GeoEngineers, Inc/ Foster Park and Horseshoe Bend Levee Improvements Motion: Move to recommend Council authorize the Mayor to sign Amendment No. 2 to the Consultant Services Agreement between the City of Kent and GeoEngineers, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $33,040 for the purpose of responding to comments from the Federal Emergency Management Agency for certification of the Foster Park and Horseshoe Bend levees, upon concurrence of the language therein by the City Attorney and the Public Works Director. Summary: On September 1, 2010 the City of Kent submitted Conditional Letters of Map Revision (CLOMR) and supporting documentation to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to certify the Foster Park and Horseshoe Bend Levee. FEMA has completed their Initial review and has provided the City with comments and a request for additional Information. GeoEngineers, along with Northwest Hydraulic Consultants, prepared the original application to FEMA and this contract is for GeoEngineers to prepare the necessary work to respond to FEMA's comments. This scope of work also Includes design of proposed Improvements to Horseshoe Bend that may be necessary for levee certification. Budget Impact: This work will be reimbursed using the $10,000,000 grant from the Washington Department of Ecology for Horseshoe Bend/Foster Park levee certification. KENT YJASMIHGTON AMENDMENT NO. 2 NAME OF CONSULTANT OR VENDOR: GeoEnglneers, Inc. CONTRACT NAME & PROJECT NUMBER: Horseshoe Send Levee Improvements ORIGINAL AGREEMENT DATE: December 11. 2009 This Amendment is made between the City and the above-referenced Consultant or Vendor and amends the original Agreement and all prior Amendments. All other provisions of the original Agreement or prior Amendments not inconsistent with this Amendment shall remain in full force and effect. For valuable consideration and by mutual consent of the parties, Consultant or Vendor's work is modified as follows: 1. Section I of the Agreement, entitled "Description of Work," is hereby modified to add additional work or revise existing work as follows: In addition to work required under the original Agreement and any prior Amendments, the Consultant or Vendor shall: Analyze and provide design recommendations for two areas of the Horseshoe Bend Levee. For a description, see the Consultant's October 12, 2010 Scope of Work which is attached as Exhibit A and incorporated by this reference. 2. The contract amount and time for performance provisions of Section II "Time of Completion," and Section III, "Compensation," are modified as follows: Original Contract Sum, $135,280.00 including applicable WSST Net Change by Previous Amendments $34,500.00 including applicable WSST Current Contract Amount $169,780.00 including all previous amendments Current Amendment Sum $33,040.00 Applicable WSST Tax on this $0 Amendment Revised Contract Sum $202,820.00 AMENDMENT - 1 OF 2 Original Time for Completion 11/30/10 (insert date) Revised Time for Completion under 12/31/10 prior Amendments (insert date) Add'I Days Required (t) for this 0 calendar days Amendment Revised Time for Completion 12/31/10 (insert date) The Consultant or Vendor accepts all requirements of this Amendment by signing below, by its signature waives any protest or claim it may have regarding this Amendment, and acknowledges and accepts that this Amendment constitutes full payment and final settlement of all claims of any kind or nature arising from or connected with any work either covered or affected by this Amendment, including, without limitation, claims related to contract time, contract acceleration, onsite or home office overhead, or lost profits. This Amendment, unless otherwise provided, does not relieve the Consultant or Vendor from strict compliance with the guarantee and warranty provisions of the original Agreement. All acts consistent with the authority of the Agreement, previous Amendments (if any), and this Amendment, prior to the effective date of this Amendment, are hereby ratified and affirmed, and the terms of the Agreement, previous Amendments (if any), and this Amendment shall be deemed to have applied. The parties whose names appear below swear under penalty of perjury that they are authorized to enter into this Amendment, which is binding on the parties of this contract. IN WITNESS, the parties below have executed this Amendment, which will become effective on the last date written below. CONSULTANT/VENDOR: CITY OF KENT: By: By: (signature) (signature) Print Name: Print Name: Suzette Cooke Its Its Mayor (title) (title) DATE: DATE: APPROVED AS TO FORM: I (applicable if Mayor's signature required) Kent Law Department GmEnglneers-Honeshoe Bend Amd Z/MadRi AMENDMENT - 2 OF 2 EXHIBIT A GEOENGWEERS, INC. ANALYSIS OF HORSESHOE BEND LEVEE GREEN RIVER, FROM KENT CITY LIMITS TO 3Ro STREET KENT,WASHINGTON OCTOBER 12, 2010 SCOPE OF ADDITIONAL SERVICES - GEOTECHNICAL The purpose of our additional services is to analyze and provide design recommendations for two areas of the Horseshoe Bend Levee. These two areas were identified in our initial study as requiring modifications to meet the minimum standards for Levee Certification under 44CFR 65.10. This additional analysis will be provided as an addendum to the Horseshoe Bend Levee Certification Report and will be based on the final designs in this area. The west levee modification area is located from River Mile 24.31 to 24.45, between South 2591h Street and South 261st Street. Preliminary plans for this portion of the levee system include a setback levee that may include a concrete floodwail. The east levee modification area is located from River Mile 25.80 to 26.14 and is adjacent to the Horseshoe Pump Station. Preliminary plans for this area include widening the crest of the levee. Retaining walls may be required to achieve grade in this area. In addition we will also provide analysis in response to comments from FEMA reviewers with regard to the Foster Park Certification Report. This additional analysis will be incorporated into a revised levee certification report. We do not anticipate that additional explorations will be required. Our specific scope of services includes: L Review existing subsurface information from the previous phase, including in-house reports, reports by others provided by the City of Kent and appropriate Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)and USACE documents. 2. Complete stability analyses for the east levee modification area. These analyses will delineate the extent, upstream and downstream, where modifications are required We will also provide more detail to the extent of the modifications required. 3. Provide recommendations for the design and construction of retaining walls. We will address both seepage and stability issues. 4. Complete general seepage analyses for the modified areas. We will consider the following conditions: end of construction, sudden drawdown, critical flood stage and steady state seepage during full flood stage. 5. Complete limit equilibrium slope stability analyses for the modified levee sections, considering each of the above-listed conditions, using the SlopeW computer program. 6. Complete stability analysis of SR 167 embankment fill for the Foster Park Levee Certification Report. This analysis will consider the four above-listed conditions. GEOENGINEERS FiU No 04110 7P-00 City of Kent October 12,2010 Page 2 7. Revise our Horseshoe Bend Levee Certification Report and Foster Park Levee Certification Report summarizing the results of our additional seepage and stability analyses and providing our revised conclusions and recommendations. Our report will be prepared for submittal to FEMA. S. Address comments and revise submittals as needed. This includes coordination with the City of Kent, Northwest Hydraulics, USACE and FEMA to incorporate necessary revisions into the submittal of the final report. 9. Provide an independent analysis of the health of trees along the levee and the proposed improvement areas. We will subcontract a licensed arborist for this service. Our scope does not include hydraulic or scour analysis. We understand that this will be provided by Northwest Hydraulics if needed. Our scope and budget also does not include any construction management, monitoring or inspections. Attachment: Exhibit B Fee Estimate Disclaimer Any electronic form,facsimile or hard copy of the original document(email,text,table,andfor'guire),if provided,and any attachments are only a copy of the original document The original document Is stored by GeoEnglneers,Inc and will serve as the official document of record CopynghtCO 2010 by GeoEngineers,Inc Ali rights reserved GMENGMEERS Ml1 No 0410172,00 EXHIBIT B FEE ESTIMATE CITY OF KENT GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES HORSESHOE BEND EAST LEVEE IMPROVEMENTS GREEN RIVER, FROM KENT CITY LIMITS TO SR 167 FILE NO 0410-172-00 Personnel Hours x Rate Cost Principal (Gary Henderson) 20 x $160 = $3,200 Project Engineer 1 (Lyle Stone) 80 x $146 $11,600 Engineer/Scientist 2 (Various) 120 x $112 $13,440 CAD Designer 10 x $85 = $850 Support 10 x $75 = $750 Subtotal Personnel Cost(direct costs) $29,840 Other Expenses Arbonst Subconsultant $2,000 Miscellaneous Mlllage, Postage, Copying, etc $1,200 Subtotal (indirect costs) $3,200 Total Estimated Costs $33,040 File No 04111-172-00 October 12,2010 GEOENGINEERS tKent City Council Meeting Date November 2, 2010 Category Consent Calendar - 71 1. SUBJECT: FARM HOUSE BILL OF SALE - ACCEPT 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Accept the Bill of Sale for the Farm House project, permit #2083239, for 2 gate valves, 1 hydrant, and 20.5 linear feet of waterline, 1 catch basin, and 127 linear feet of storm sewer line. 3. EXHIBITS: Bill of Sale 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Director (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) j5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? N/A Revenue? -N/A Currently in the Budget? Yes _ No 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds I DISCUSSION: ACTION: � I OF KENS tFEB 10 lot GINEEAING dil KFIN T W A S H i N G T O N MAIL TO: ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ATTN: 220 4Tn AVENUE SOUTH KENT,WASH�GTON 98032 /�[ccc ZoE323S PROJECT: LOCATION: TAB ACCT NO: BILL OF SALE CITY OF KENT KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON THIS INSTRUMENT made this 16 day of 12e,,,,y✓t e 20 g 9 , by and between alNfi wn c hereinafter called"Grantors",and City of Kent,a municipal corporation of King County,State of Washington,hereinafter called"Grantee": WITNESSETH: That the said Grantors for a valuable consideration,does hereby grant,bargain,sell to Grantee the following described improvements: A. WATERMAINS: together with a total of / ' b gate valves at$4 Z 0 s each, / hydrants at$ '75"0. each and/or any other ' appurtenances thereto. ON SE Ze>7_'�Sf FROMLhsY o '��'�uGS L•' TO (street,esmt,etc) Including Zo• S— linear feet at$ WSJ per LF of (o (size& type) 10 .� waterline. B. SANITARY SEMTM: Together with a total of manholes at $ each and/or any other appurtenances thereto. 1 Billll of Sale ON FROM TO (street,esmt,etc) Including linear feet at S per LF of (size& type) sewer line. C. STRF.F.TS: Together with curbs,gutters,sidewalks,and/or any other appurtenances thereto. ON FROM TO (street,esmt,etc) Including centerline LF at S per LF of (type)streets, Feet asphalt roadway. D. STORM SEWERS: Together with a total of manholes at S each or a total of^catch basins at S 16 SD each, IF of bioliltration swale or drainage ditch with a total cost of$ CF of detention pond storage with a total cost of S ,and/or any other appurtenances thereto. ON .SZ' Z(,0 t� S-1^ FROM LZ&c 4 o 0 8-t vG 5,E TO (street,esmt,etc) Including /Z7 linear feet at S `A-g 0 per LF of /Z (size &type) '?I/C sewer line. To have and to hold the same to the said Grantee,its successors and assigns forever. The undersigned hereby covenants that it is the lawful owner of said property; and that the same is free from all encumbrances;that all bills for labor and material have been paid; that it has the right to sell the same aforesaid;that it will warrant and defend the same against the lawful claims and demand of all person. The Bill of Sale is given on consideration of the agreement of the Grantee for itself,its successors and assigns to incorporate said utilities in its utility system and to maintain them as provided in the applicable City Ordinances. i IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned has caused this instrument to be executed on this 0, day of ,20 10 t G 2 of 4 Bill of Sale STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) On this l day of 20 ,before me,the undersigned A Notary Public in and for the State o ashington,duly commissioned and sworn,Personally appeared ,Jl)n -tf)0-rl-L:n , C°jC-7 0 to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument,and acknowledged to me that he/she signed and sealed this instrument as his/her free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN under my hand and official seal this day of f-i�M-I-A¢e-20 10 Notary Public in and for the State of Washington,residin at tcs It j?. _n -r.0A�S�o �d My Commission Expires: 1�Z1 L 1 ! The Bill of Sale is given and accepted pursuant to a motion duly made,seconded,and passed by the City Council of the City of Kent,King County,Washington,on the day of ,20 l 1 � I 3 of Bill of Sale ADDENDUM TO BILL OF SALE CITY OF KENT The figures used on the Bill of Sale for 1'54,v9k" /ZusG - WC c L 20 8.3Z3 S project dated /6 !kc<„�6<2 7_od 5' ,were based on the"As-Built" Engineering Plans dated // ./12ece. la<-e z oU5 _, for the same said &Ns c' project. zEX/4 NOc/2 z //2O/3 CITE the undersigned P.E. or land surveyor is the person responsible for the preparation of the Bill of Sale and is an employee of DIA I P L�G- ,the firm responsible for the preparation of the"As-Built' Engineering Drawings. 1 RSP gnature �yIr o 352 �sfONALF-•�G 4 of4 Bill of Sale REPORTS FROM STANDING COMMITTEES AND STAFF A. COUNCIL PRESIDENT B. MAYOR C. OPERATIONS COMMITTEE D. PARKS AND HUMAN SERVICES COMMITTEE E. ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE F. PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE G. PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE H. ADMINISTRATION REPORTS FROM SPECIAL COMMITTEES 1 Page 1 City of Kent Parks and Human Services Committee ' KENT Meeting Minutes of September 16, 2010 Council Committee Present: Chair Debbie Ranniger, Elizabeth Albertson, Dennis Higgins Debbie Ranniger called the meeting to order at 5:02 p.m. 1. Minutes of July 15, 2010 - Approve Elizabeth Albertson moved to approve the minutes of July 15, 2010. Dennis Higgins seconded. The motion passed with a vote of 3-0. 2. Safe Havens Update - Informational Katherin Johnson and Jeff Watling provided an update regarding Safe Havens and the recent work of the Friends of Safe Havens group. Work continues on the 2010 year-end budget and to seek solutions for the forecasted deficit in the 2011 operating budget. Sound Mental Health continue their efforts to assume operation of the program and recently submitted a Letter of Interest to the City. Their vision is to maintain a visitation program. Katherin clarified that funding for Sound Mental Health comes from the Federal Government, Medicare and Medicaid. Katherin noted that the efficiencies of the program will be better maintained with an outside agency and confirmed that existing programs would carry over and the existing facility space would be used. Debbie Ranniger suggested contacting the Washington State Veteran's Administration to inquire about funding to cover a percentage of veterans utilizing Safe Havens. Staff will keep the Committee updated. 3. 215t Century Community Learning Centers Grant - Accept Lori Hogan stated that the $6,190.00 from the Washington Alliance for Better I Schools is reimbursement for program services provided at Mill Creek Middle School and Millennium Elementary in Kent, as part of the agreed partnership of the Federal grant titled "215t Century Community Learning Center." This grant is for five (5) years, subject to annual renewal and covers program expenses including staffing and supplies. The program is budgeted and this grant pays a portion of the expenses. Dennis Higgins moved to recommend accepting the grant from the Washington Alliance for Better Schools in the amount of $6,190.00, for Mill Creek All Stars and Millennium Elementary After School programs, amend the budget, authorize expenditure of the funds in accordance with the grant agreement, and authorize the Mayor to Page 1 Page 2 sign all necessary documents. Elizabeth Albertson seconded. The ' motion passed with a vote of 3-0. 4. Community Putting Prevention to Work Grant - Accept ' The City of Kent has been awarded $180,000.00 from the Seattle/King County Health Department under the Community Putting Prevention to Work (CPPW) grant. This economic stimulus grant is administered nationally through the Centers for Disease Control and is aimed at reducing obesity and tobacco use. Grant funds will used to complete bicycle pedestrian planning, analyze options to increase access to healthy food for at-risk and school-aged populations, and implement nutritional standards within City facilities. The program is consistent with Council and Mayor Cooke's Strategic Goals and the Park Plan. Community Development is taking the lead on this county-wide program because it's a land use based program. The data received will be compared spatially with the location of restaurants, based on the location of fast food and socioeconomic indicators. As part of the program, the community will be educated to make healthier choices and zoning changes could potentially be implemented so that healthy food choices are available to a broader base of the population. Nutritional standards in our facilities and programs will be reviewed and potentially impacted as well. Phase one of the program will be an inventory of all city programs that include a food component. The program will be staffed by existing staff, plus one contracted transportation position to manage the trails component. Part of Lydia Moorehead's salary will be funded for her participation in the program. Elizabeth Albertson moved to recommend accepting the grant from the Seattle/King County Health Department under the Community Putting Prevention to Work Program in the amount of $180,000.00, amend the budget, authorize expenditure of the funds in accordance with the grant agreement, and authorize the Mayor to sign all necessary documents, subject to terms and conditions acceptable to the City Attorney. Dennis Higgins seconded. The motion passed with a vote of 3-0. S. Adaptive Recreation Position Adiustment - Authorize Jeff stated that the recent consolidation of the Resource Center to the Kent Commons and the retirement of Janet Hasselblad as the Recreation Manager for Adaptive Recreation created an opportunity to review the manager position and to consider re-classification prior to filling it. Staff reviewed the core duties of the position. Now that the consolidation to the Kent Commons is complete, it appears that the staffing level/classification most appropriate >/ for this position is a full-time Recreation Coordinator. Page 2 ' Page 3 There would be no budget impact to this re-classification. The 2010 budget (salary and benefits) for the .80 Manager was $84,661.00. An entry level ' (34A) Recreation Coordinator at full-time would be around $80,000.00. Within the Recreation Division, this position will report to Julie Stangle, Recreation Manager. A proposal was presented and approved by Mayor ' Cooke and John Hodgson. The request is to recommend approval of the additional .20 full-time employee (FTE) that is netted by this adjustment from a Manager to a Coordinator. ' Dennis Higgins moved to recommend authorizing a .20 full-time employee increase within the Recreation Division to accommodate ' re-structuring within the Adaptive Recreation Program. Elizabeth Albertson seconded. The motion passed with a vote of 3-0. 1 6. EarthCorps Agreement - Authorize Staff applied for and received a $20,670.00 grant from the King Conservation ' District. This request is to contract with EarthCorps, which has the expertise to manage restoration efforts safely along steep slopes. Their crews will spend one week at Earthworks and two weeks at Lake Fenwick implementing ' a technique called "survival rings" to save approximately 150 trees. Jeff explained that survival rings is clearing the ivy around the base of the tree and cutting up to a certain height. Focus will be the steep sloped areas of ' both parks. The ivy will return and additional maintenance will be necessary. This is a first step and critical to creating a healthy understory, is to make maintenance easier in the future. This technique will create healthier tfoundation to discourage ivy and weeds from growing. Elizabeth Albertson moved to recommend authorizing the Mayor to ' sign all necessary documents to contract with EarthCorps in the amount of $20,670.00 to perform site restoration at Lake Fenwick and Earthworks Park. Dennis Higgins seconded. The motion passed ' with a vote of 3-0. 7. Director's Report - Informational ' Green Kent The Green Kent Draft Report has been finalized and represents a lot of hard ' work in Parks, Public Works and the Cascade Land Conservancy (CLC). The premise of the plan is to look at all of our green spaces, creating sustainability within our urban green spaces. The implementation is multiple ' layers. The nine pieces to the "treeage" criteria looks at our inventory, accompanied by supporting information on what we can do with it. A portion of the criteria represents our the highest need in our lowest and highest ' threat areas. Invasive management strategy is also a part of the plan. The Plan is in SEPA review right now. Volunteer Steward training is scheduled for December 4, at the Senior Center & Earthworks Park. Page 3 Page 4 , Debbie Ranniger referenced including research/evaluation of invasive growth patterns in the reporting. She advised using a timeline for invasive removal. Jeff noted that this is not a concurrency based plan. As the plan becomes final, the balance between staff and volunteers will be critical. There is no financial commitment as of yet, but there is a short-term and long-term ' financial need. An Endowment Fund will be set up to encourage support. The CLC will assist in presenting the final Green Kent Plan for adoption in the fall- winter of 2010. , West Fenwick Skate Park • West Fenwick Skate Park has been a notorious site for vandalism and graffiti, but the artwork recently painted on the bowl has proven to be very effective in keeping vandals away. The artwork was created by Scott Madoulet, Mike Hattrup and Dea Drake from the City and the painting was done in two days by city staff, skaters, and volunteers. This is a great example of our ongoing effort to proactively deter graffiti. Community Service Day ' Community Service Day was Saturday, September 11, with 47 volunteers at Clark Lake Park and 144 volunteers at Park Orchard (a potential gem , park located in the newly annexed area of Panther Lake). Our thanks go to the volunteers from the Church of Ladder Day Saints. Summer Programs • Many thanks to Lori Hogan and staff for a great summer of successful programs and events. There were non-stop tournaments from April to , September at Russell Road, Kent Memorial Park and Service Club. All of our tournaments bring an incredible amount of revenue to the City at local restaurants and hotels. The Summer Camp Program was full of kids , daily and Chestnut Ridge in the Panther Lake area was added to the program. Park Operations Re-Structuring , • Throughout this summer, Jeff and the Operations leadership staff reviewed and discussed service delivery and the possibility of realigning ' the organizational structure and leadership of areas. In October, operation will move from a facility based leadership towards a more geographic leadership. The new orientation will add better flexibility and ' responsiveness to services, as well as create a more consistent level of service. The new re-organization will be begin in October. Upcoming Volunteer Opportunities , National Public Lands Days ' • Turnkey Park on September 25, from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. t Page 4 ' Page 5 ' ReLeaf • Clark Lake Park on October 9, from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. Make a Difference Day/Off Leash Dog Park Dedication • Morrill Meadows on October 23, from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m., finishing ' up the Off Leash Dog Park area and then the Off Leash Dog Park Dedication is at 1:00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m. ' Contact: Victoria Andrews at 253-856-5113 for all volunteer activities. Wilson Playground Dedication ' The southeast corner of Wilson Playfield has been renovated to include a playground area that maximizes our current park space. Two very innovative play structures are being installed. The NEOS interactive Play ' Station and the Playweb. The dedication is scheduled for Saturday, October 2, from 1:00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m. ' Spotlight Series • Cowboy Junkies on October 2, 7:30 p.m. at Kentwood. Tickets for all concerts can be purchased on-line or by calling Kent Commons at 253-856-5000. ' Art Exhibit Artist Danny Pierce is being celebrated by exhibiting his art in the Centennial Building from September 10 - October 29, 2010. Gallery hours ' are Monday - Friday, 8am-5pm. The meeting ad]ourned at 6:03 p.m. ' Respectfully Submitted, ' Teri Petrole Page 5 1 ' 3 PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE MINUTES ' Monday, October 04, 2010 COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT: ' Harmon stated that Committee Chair Raplee would be a few minutes late and that he has her concurrence on Item 1. Committee Chair Debbie Raplee arrived just after Item 1 was approved Members Ron Harmon and Dennis Higgins were present. The meeting was called ' to order at 4:04 p.m. ITEM 1 - Approval of Minutes Dated September 20, 2010: Committee Member Higgins moved to approve the minutes of September 20, 2010. ' The motion was seconded by Harmon and passed 3-0, with Raplee's concurrence. Item 2 was moved to item 6. ' Item 3 2- Information Only/South 2401h Street & 941h Avenue South Intersection Chad Bieren, City Engineer, noted that committee members requested that staff consider ' modifying the traffic signal at South 240`h Street and 941h Avenue South to provide a protected left turn arrow east/west bound for South 240`h street traffic In the past two years two studies have been done. Based on information gathered, staff suggested that the signal remain as is. It was noted that a small portion of traffic makes turns at this intersection. Kent resident, Mel Roberts stated that he Ives close to this intersection and thinks it would ' be a good idea to have a protected turn. Cost for the installation is roughly $17,000 for construction only. There are currently no ' funds available for this work. Committee members asked that this item be brought back for further consideration. ' Information Only/No Motion Required Item 4 3- Information Only/Fall Recvclina Event: ' Kelly Peterson announced that the annual Fall Recycling Event will be held October 16, 9:00 am -3:00 pm at Russell Road Park. Residents are invited to bring items not easily recycled at the curb; he included the following list of items: • Appliances & Scrap Metal Batteries, • Propane Tanks • Toilets & Sinks ' • Electronics, other than Computers and TV's which are accepted at most Goodwill Stores and St. Vincent de Paul sites • Concrete, Asphalt, Rock & Brick ' Document Shredding - up to 3 file boxes per vehicle • New this fall - Mattresses will be collected for recycling NW Center will be on site to collect reusable household goods ' Peterson noted that some items have a small fee. More information can be found at www KentRecycles com or by calling Gina Hungerford at (253) 856-5549 ' This event is paid for by the Department of Ecology coordinated Prevention Grant, the King County Waste Reduction and Recycling Grant, the Local Hazardous Waste Management Program Grant and user fees. ' Information Only/No Motion Required Page I of 2 4 ' PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE MINUTES Monday, October 04, 2010 ' Item 6-4 Information Only/259th Street Raising - Update: Design Engineering Manager, Mark Howlett gave an informative PowerPoint presentation on ' the South 259th Street Road Raising. He talked about the FEMA issued Flood Insurance Rate Map and showed several photo's of the area Information Only/No Motion Required ' Item 6-5 - Information Only/Grant Funded Transportation Proiects: , Public Works Director, Tim LaPorte gave an update on grants we currently have in place and showed an overview map and the locations of the various grants and the funding associated with each of them. Information Only/No Motion Required ITEM -2 6-South 277th Corridor Interlocal Agreement for Valley Communications ' Fiber: IT Director, Mike Carrington stated that Funding for the project will be shared among the ValleyCom project partners and any cost overruns would be similarly divided. The conduit exists and will be placed on the north side of 277th Street. Funding for Kent's portion of the project is included in I.T.'s budget. Assistant City Attorney, Kathy Hardy noted the changes that were made to the agreement. Higgins moved to recommend Council authorize the Mayor to sign the Interlocal Agreement between the City of Kent, Valley Communications Center and the City of Auburn for the installation and use of fiber optic cable and equipment on the South ' 277th Street corridor, subject to terms and conditions acceptable to the City Attorney and the Public Works Director. Further, move to authorize the Mayor to award the construction contract to the lowest responsive bidder and to authorize , the Mayor to sign the construction contract. The motion was seconded by Harmon and passed 3-0. The meeting was adjourned at 4:57 p.m. ' Next Meeting: Monday, October 18, 2010 at 4:00 p m. ' Cheryl Viseth, , Public Works Secretary Page 2 of 2 iEXECUTIVE SESSION ACTION AFTER EXECUTIVE SESSION