Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
City Council Meeting - Council - Agenda - 11/17/2009
3 AM M iIt C City of Kent CityCouncil Meeting Agenda A 1 3 J� I { {:- November 17, 2009 ;. Mayor Suzette Cooke Debbie Raplee, Council President Councilmembers Elizabeth Albertson Ron Harmon Tim Clark Deborah Ranniger 1 Jamie Danielson Les Thomas 40 ` KENT il„ . .. WAS H I NGTON City Clerk's Office 1 t 9« ^%�� KENT CITY COUNCIL AGENDAS KENT November 17, 2009 W ,1,.,_,.,N Council Chambers MAYOR: Suzette Cooke COUNCILMEMBERS: Debbie Raplee, President Elizabeth Albertson Tim Clark Jamie Danielson Ron Harmon Deborah Ranniger Les Thomas COUNCIL WORKSHOP AGENDA 5:30 p.m. Item Description Speaker Time 1. Regional Fire Authority Chief Schneider 40 minutes 2. Emergency Operations Center (EOC) Chief Schneider 10 minutes Training for Councilmembers 3. Intergovernmental Issues Michelle Witham 10 minutes ********************************************************************** COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA 7:00 p.m. 1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE 2. ROLL CALL 3. CHANGES TO AGENDA A. FROM COUNCIL, ADMINISTRATION, OR STAFF B. FROM THE PUBLIC - Citizens may request that an item be added to the agenda at this time. Please stand or raise your hand to be recognized by the Mayor. 4. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS A. Public Recognition B. Employee Recognition C. Community Events ' D. Green Business of the Year E. Employee of the Month F. School Partnerships Proclamation G. Legislative Agenda H. Public Safety Report 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. 2010 Operating Budget (second hearing) B. 2010-2015 Capital Improvement Plan (second hearing) and Comprehensive Plan Amendments C. 2009 Tax Levy for 2010 Budget D. Kent Comprehensive Plan and Amendments to Kent City Code Chapter 12.13 School Impact Fees (Continued) COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA CONTINUED 1 6. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Minutes of Previous Meeting - Approve B. Payment of Bills - Approve C. Washington Traffic Safety Commission Grant - Accept D. Fire Prevention Interlocal Agreement - Authorize E. Council Absence - Approve 7. OTHER BUSINESS A. Joint Underwriting Association Resolution B. Local Business Preference Ordinance 8. BIDS None 9. REPORTS FROM STANDING COMMITTEES, STAFF AND SPECIAL COMMITTEES 10. CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS 11. EXECUTIVE SESSION AND AFTER EXECUTIVE SESSION A. Labor Negotiations 12. ADJOURNMENT NOTE: A copy of the full agenda packet is available for perusal in the City Clerk's Office and the Kent Library. The Agenda Summary page and complete packet are on the City of Kent web site at www.a.kent.wa.us. An explanation of the agenda format is given on the back of this page. Any person requiring a disability accommodation should contact the City Clerk's Office in advance at (253) 856-5725. For TDD relay service call the Washington Telecommunications Relay Service at 1-800-833-6388. T U a d 2 pro T O i Q O T N¢r ro C E J 00 aaL0 ° > m ro�E o u = o c C 2RO CD m E yO JO .. �C roYAnRs c F oE v c w- J v .E `p v R 3 a� ai a c m E c a '�, c ro v �. c= �� o E y� EL°' d3 Es o-o o cn y m oL v av n.� Jv u aT� �, a ;� � o � c0Oa u a- onovvo RWo � 0JaR L La� 3 E R • � c� rs .To� u> B� E � M "U0 000" omv roa au >°� L Ea o R c y= d - J� �� v u `o ��yL .J z uo � R � � ^�roa- °'� uEc `T° va � m� co- cV-''vy vE-° RmRu0 = ro `oEEro �ta�� J � ac,Ococo Ems'. o m ai E y • b _v y._ s �� o.s J Ja ro ti o E 3 o E E u o ro E c � roo.- o-O >o.Vro nJ. oRy � m >o.E °u� "'v �^ ��2 UE w .0 o�cn yob LLB 1.n .0 w ° �v ... row`-' mac � � B yyvRu ��� E c E _ V E cOJv CL ro d E W E p._ y L N T .D T N .- CO R N J y E m L O-L N ^ R- E I�^ N? E N T ''S V O O P O L U O y �F '� Yv��EmE n.vc �aQv cW- Yn> REU E v -Cl cR w. > J L E .0 O � J N N L m y R N O O. C R o.a R U o Y O V N_C U w 0 O .OQ U E V V o O E o o _T m T•. o N v 0 v E c y N E v `E y oa Ea • O3N .v..ay r F EF �CEUON O x c<0 NN EJ9 V KLC - —✓u C a Q2 > awa o woy � > � E c .� ..a� 2 R�-�c m m0 m mF Y oc N > a O c R N CL¢'r � a@o O NE � rocUN f="'� V E; a�Eis �acb ° o = rcnEooO cJcJ v a.� v 0-0 - ai v0 : vN ° rs$ ovo co O vo E � V U R - V W o2OtP 0- V . y - VUR U � F ii t o 3 •z z > N s p N M Z J J R 3 m > N > N • C ¢ c R SEE -R-.N N Y O cu Noo o� Li C)0 � o> u m z uV v YU m T m 7 J LL1 Y U a J V� c ro-o rZ U p U Q m E d v T o o _�_ v 3 L= v C Tau..- N N po. • L 1 p N p O % ro T1 = J 0 0 ` R > R w o 6a ° c E m R Y ro v E R ro o • V N o- w p O` .0 O V dY"viceoro R .ca 3a Ron--Yw y J (D o v�0^ S� v a T a� L `o N u ��m 3 o a c� n r o 3 To.-vI,av 0v oE vro °�° E °E Vw.L 0 a ¢ E—ms ¢ t tCOUNCIL WORKSHOP t1) REGIONAL FIRE AUTHORITY t t2) EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER (EOC) TRAINING FOR COUNCILMEMBERS t t 3) INTERGOVERNMENTAL ISSUES t t t t 1 t t t t t 11/6/2009 Review Of 4#, n K3w � a r4`a.. •�� .. rv..«�a_�e*_.`.4«_ y :.. ...»«may_ �.0._ _ s ,a x Agenda ty`•we s Challenges and r Opportunities aX✓ ��5w'"'�`..ar�x i T+^+" ^..n,sam.:"�ry}'�-a«a a' 2�'� s'm'�=��- V 1 11/6/2009 M Section 1 Needs Statement s a - Section 1 Needs Statement ,•._. ._ 3. Sect€can 2 " Needs Statement 2 i 11/6/2009 Section 3 Formation Authority Section 4 Jurisdictional Boundaries '_ _ , ` ,,- > Sectiotl 4 �Y Jurisdictional Boundaries Propde!I(eM H0a+a1 fln•�1ry�gfy P eeul,Nin�CrWu.�il�ry w"I 1erl A�C" zqm WP } b, 3 11/6/2009 Section 5 Governance ITT M • 8 p '1^ _ r t Section 6 /Organizational Structure/Operations • aa- e x {' `t Organizational Structure/Operations a Xr 4 , 11/6/2009 Section 7 Financial Considerations �Y-�R✓ «If l w a, • ;gym; vw- Section 7 Financial Considerations lk a t• 6a� - r z i Section 7 Financial Considerations "pe A � i r5 11/6/zoag Section 8 a Admin/Management/Personnel RW . _ 1 I Section 8 Admin/Management/Personnel M F y B e A Section 8 �sw Admin/Management/Personnel i 8 1 6 11/6/2009 r Section 8 $3,'> Admin/Management/Personnel 4•` t #Y 6 1' YS 3g, 1 Section 8 Admin/Management/Personnel Section 8 ` Admin/Management/Personnel s y 9 i tl ».. Y•Yu I p �.s'js'..` a'rvs - r 11/6/2009 Section 9 Fire Prevention,Emergency Management,Fire Investigations 4 ! < ,_.= Section 0 Fire Prevention, Emergency NW�, A Mana ement Fire Investi ations •4 • .$yaks' ; n... Section 9 Fire Prevention,Emergency N Mana ement Fire Investi ations , e 8 11/6/2009 Section 9 Fire Prevention, Emergency Management,Fire Investigations •- a - � i. J • e ♦ e 'a^ a • =ems x° '�•,, N Identify LQrJis for the RFPSA 4x 3 9 9 11/6/2009 Current Fire Department Funding m 9 J Y' Current and future 2010 Fire Department Fending GG =' Current Fire Department Funding anr• —• 10 t 11/6/2009 Current Fire Department Funding 77 C.`n SY`m•vy®"'xn° m .smZ"` vn .�..`r'a'4wa<•`+t• •�,>•y"`1�C4s.rm � mmrt'ceM Y w.:.«aim` x _ �.s:-GY-�•!.nee ='�"1.^,v�'N.'�...`3�Y i Current Fire Department Fending Projected i2FPA Funding , 11 11/6/2009 Projected RFPSA Funding o,s= a• . a,, - r� Fire Benefit Charge Application Fire benefit Charge Appiicatiran lk- 0 e a• � e x i " I r- t piw 12 j 11/6/2009 e December 2009, April 2010, and July 2010 u �," 9y_" �.. . .♦ _. -♦ •a a ass a c s, P In Closing. . . 're' P ♦ r'R.. `.'l` arm' ♦ ♦ �"a' a rN `�`3z^'b., 'fir H.y�gA::r '� 8 a 8 ♦ ak=.,^-'�,..`"".T _ _ - .•`_ _ —do-yy+ �+ � In Closing. . . V777 _ I r. 13 11/6/2009 i i 2010/ 2011 Regional Fire Authority 14 , CHANGES TO THE AGENDA Citizens wishing to address the Council will, at this time, make known the subject of interest, so all may be properly heard. A) FROM COUNCIL, ADMINISTRATION, OR STAFF I B) FROM THE PUBLIC ) i 1 1 1 l 1 t PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS 1 A) PUBLIC RECOGNITION rlo B) EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION -] DOO C) COMMUNITY EVENTS I014AM+W\.6.� QAAAk.. vi D) GREEN BUSINESS OF THE YEAR E) EMPLOYEE OF THE YEAR Cc 11'Vi �RJt �c1Q.� F) SCHOOL PARTNERSHIPS PROCLAMATION � 1 ' G) LEGISLATIVE ENDA LIM H)/PUBLIC SAFETY REPORT 'v r City of Kent TOP PRIORITY Issues 2010 Legislature Flood-Response, Flood Prevention Efforts The diminished capacity of the Howard Hanson Dam to hold back potential winter flood waters, and the un-certified nature of most Green River system levees, will drive Kent's top-priority effort for 2010. The City will --Seek ways to raise awareness of, and begin specific efforts toward, identifying ways the State of Washington can partner in the $300 million+ investment needed to repair and upgrade levees along the 13-mile Green River system, --Join lawmakers, area businesses, and chambers of commerce in pushing for creation of a "Joint Underwriting Association" to enable Green River Valley businesses to purchase supplemental flood insurance --Work with the Washington Cities' Insurance Authority, and other cities, on assuring liability immunity for good-faith flood-response and flood-prevention actions taken by municipalities This liability immunity already is in place for the U S Army Corps of Engineers, and for King County Fiscal/Budget Issues • Streamlined Sales Tax "full mitigation" payments: Kent will actively work with the Association of Washington Cities (AWC) and other individual cities to ensure "full-mitigation" SST payments remain intact for those jurisdictions negatively Impacted by the 2007 legislation changing local sales tax "sourcing" from an origin- based model to a destination-based model • Legislation to preserve the authority of cities to impose a Brokered Natural Gas (BNG) tax: Kent will be actively engaged as a coalition of the Association of Washington Cities (AWC) and individual cities seek 2010 legislation to preserve the authority of cities to impose a BNG The current BNG, which has been subjected to a legal challenge that is now pending In the State Supreme Court, generates an estimated $300-400,000 per year for Kent. Transportation • "Street Utility" for local maintenance & preservation needs: Kent will join the AWC, Spokane, Vancouver, Tacoma and others in actively seeking the re- establishment of "street utility" or"street maintenance fee" authority for cities to address maintenance and preservation needs Over the last 10 years, with the impact of various initiatives, Kent has seen a cumulative $44 million diminution in funds for basic street overlay and repair While the City will actively seek the street utility tool in 2010, it has committed to delaying any implementation of such a fee during these recessionary times 2010 City of Kent I Legislative Priorities 1 • Seed funding to study the SR-1671SR-516 interchange area- Given a current "alternative transportation financing" study, and the possibility of the 2011 Legislature exploring the Idea of a new-revenue package for transportation, Kent will seek state seed-funding to help with a study of the SR-167/SR-516 interchange area, in order to bring specific project design Ideas to lawmakers in 2011 Unfunded Mandates, Local Revenues • Refrain from imposing new unfunded mandates; protect local funding to extent possible: With the continuing economic struggles, and with Kent as an example of a city that has had to make major cuts and impose layoffs in order to keep its budget afloat, the city urges lawmakers to refrain from unfunded mandates in 2010 and to take all possible steps to protect state-funding streams for municipalities In the unfunded-mandate area, even well-intentioned ideas around environmental stewardship and land-use need to be evaluated in light of whether they would impose new costs and burdens on financially-strapped jurisdiction 1 I 2010 City of Kent 2 Legislative Priorities City of KENT 2010 State Legislative Agenda The City of Kent's 2010 State Legislative Agenda is divided as follows: 1 The 2010 State Legislative Agenda "Top-Priority Issues" are those Kent considers to be extremely important Kent has placed these in a separate handout and will focus most of its advocacy time and energy on these items. 2 The 2010 Support/Oppose List includes items Kent considers to be very important The City will use time and effort and join others in strongly supporting beneficial measures or strongly opposing those which would have an adverse impact 3. The 2010 Track/Monitor List includes issues the City will track and monitor As these issues evolve, the City may involve itself to a greater degree if necessary 2010 City of Kent Legislative Pnonties 3 City of Kent 2010 Statement of Policy Positions — Support/Oppose & Track/Monitor Lists Criminal Justice/Courts/Jails/Law Enforcement/Fire-EMS "Support/Oppose' • Auto Theft Prevention Authority funding: Kent will support efforts to prevent further erosion of this key source of auto-theft-prevention funding • Law Enforcement Academies The 2009 Legislature directed an evaluation of law enforcement training academies A report detailing this evaluation has been prepared Kent will join other law enforcement agencies in opposing legislation that would unnecessarily undermine the current model of law enforcement academy funding and training • Oppose efforts to require Municipal Courts to hear all Domestic Violence Protection Order(DVPO) and Anti-Harassment Order (AHO) cases Municipal Courts currently have discretion to hear these cases, but are not required to There have been some efforts to require Municipal Courts to take on these cases Kent would oppose such efforts "Track/Monitor" • Fire-facility impact fee authority for cities served by fire districts: Kent will track efforts to establish this authority for cities served by fire districts HB 1080, which would have done so, passed the House in 2009 but 'died' on the Senate Floor • Washington Fire Chiefs' Association initiatives: Kent will track a number of items expected to be brought forward by WFCA, including clarifications to the Regional Fire Authority statute, the idea of a "simple majority" for EMS levies vs the current 60-percent majority requirement, and funding to form regional response teams for "CBRNE" (Chemical, Biological, Radioactive, Nuclear, Explosives) incidents • Oppose efforts to move 9-1-1 funding oversight from the Military Department to the Washington State Patrol There may bean effort in 2010 to move oversight of 9-1-1 funding from the Military Department to the WSP If so, the City will join the Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs (WASPC) in opposing such an initiative • Classifying pseudo-ephedrine and phenyl-propanolamine as schedule III controlled substances Kent will support WASPC's efforts to have these methamphetamine pre-cursor chemicals classified as schedule III controlled substances • Clarifying legislation on ignition interlocks Kent will be prepared to support this. Courts of Limited Jurisdiction — Domestic Violence Issues Work Group: The City will track legislation that may arise from discussions of a DV Work Group • Gangs Prevention Funding: The City will support efforts to enhance funding for gangs intervention — specifically any efforts to add funding for prevention. Funding for medical costs incurred by jail offenders: Kent will track efforts by AWC and others to obtain state funding assistance. 2010 City of Kent 4 Legislative Priorities Economic Development, Capital, Infrastructure "Support/Oppose" • Public Works Trust Fund: In 2009, as a way to help address a $9 billion ' shortfall in its 2009-11 Operating Budget, the Legislature swept all but $2 million out of the PWTF The Trust Fund is a critical source of low-interest loan funding for water, sewer, storm water, and transportation projects undertaken by local jurisdictions, and Kent urges the Legislature to work to restore the PWTF at the earliest opportunity "Track/Mondor" • Infrastructure funding initiatives: Kent will track these in 2010. Environmental Issues "Track/Mondor" • Puget Sound Partnership, Climate Change, Green Building, etc.: Kent will track initiatives for early-action funding, infrastructure funding, and tax incentives involving environmental issues such as Puget Sound cleanup and restoration, compact development and transit-oriented development in urban centers, and "Green Building " Fiscal Issues/Funding & Revenue Requests "Support/Oppose" • Initiative 1033• This initiative, if passed by voters, would significantly impact state and local revenues The City will be engaged in discussions regarding any potential response to I-1033 • Increased Flexibility/Efficiency/Cost-Saving Items Kent will support efforts by the AWC and others who propose some increased flexibility and efficiency/cost-saving items to the 2010 Legislature • Public Health Kent supports efforts to preserve public health funding. • 9-1-1 Taxes — New Technologies such as "Voice-Over-Internet Protocol" 9-1-1 taxes are imposed on land-line and cell-phone calls, but a number of emerging technologies, including "VOIP," are not subject to the tax Law enforcement, fire, and dispatch centers see this as a major hole in the system that threatens public safety In 2009, legislation (2SHB 2029) to address this loophole came forward While 2SHB 2029 received a majority vote, it was classified as a tax bill subject to the 2/3 majority requirements of Initiative 960 and the 2/3 majority was not achieved Kent will support this legislation if it is brought back in 2010 "Track/Monitor" • Unincorporated area utility tax authority for counties: Kent will track efforts by King County and/or the Washington State Association of Counties to give 2010 City of Kent 5 Legislative Priorities counties authority to levy a utility tax in unincorporated areas only, Kent will monitor it • Public defense and indigent defense funding: Kent supports preserving this funding and will track efforts in this area • Amendments to state law governing the use of 3/10ths of one cent sales tax (subject to voter approval) for criminal justice purposes. Kent will track a likely effort by the AWC to give cities authority to use the 3/10ths authority if counties do not do so by a time-certain General Local Government/Miscellaneous "Track/Monalor" • Kent will support efforts by the AWC to help offset the growing costs of responding to public records requests The City also will support any efforts to clarify what responsibilities local governments have in the emerging public-records area of"meta-data " • Kent will join others in opposing "reject all bids" and "contracting claims" legislation and other related legislation that undermines current contracting, bidding authority • Kent will oppose changes to "Call Before You Dig" laws that shift liability to local utilities GMA/Annexation/Land Use and Permitting "Support/Oppose" • Transit-Oriented Development— Oppose "mandate-driven" —support incentivizing: Last Session the City joined AWC and many individual cities in opposing legislation (SHB 1490) to mandate that local jurisdictions require a 50 units-per-acre level of density around transit stations Kent will join many others in pushing for 2010 incentives, not mandates, as a way of encouraging "transit- oriented development' projects and density around transit stations. • Large annexation sales tax credit: Kent will work to ensure that the state sales tax credit program for large annexations in the King, Pierce, and Snohomish county region, is left intact "Track/Monitor" • Efforts by AWC, Planning Directors, American Planning Association (APA), etc. to move GMA Plan update requirements from every seven years to every 10 years: Kent will support efforts to achieve an "every 10 years" update cycle, either via legislation or via an administrative remedy • Requiring consistent development standards in PAAs or UGAs: The AWC may well promote legislation in 2010 to require that counties have development standards in Potential Annexation Areas or Urban Growth Areas that are consistent with those in place for neighboring cities Absent the more direct legislation, a 2010 initiative may also require that counties engage in a higher level of joint planning with respect to these areas Kent will track these issues 2010 City of Kent 6 Legislative Priorities • Further refinement of annexation laws Kent will track legislative efforts to further refine annexation laws • Increased local discretion to determine what constitutes the use of "Best Available Science" and how to define "Best Available Science" There have been a number of legislative efforts in past years to provide local government agencies with more authority over the use of, and the definition of, "BAS " Kent will track this issue Housing, Human Services "Support/Oppose" • Crime-free rental housing- Kent is prepared to team up with other cities to oppose legislation that would undermine voluntary came-free rental housing programs The program in Kent has been a very successful one • Civil warrant authority for unsafe or sub-standard rental housing: Kent will support efforts by other cities to establish civil warrant authority to allow local officials o❑ the site of rental properties to inspect those believed to be unsafe or sub-standard in condition. • Housing Trust Fund,Transitional Housing and Owner/Rental Assistance(THOR) and other housing assistance funds Kent will loin others in working to preserve these funds. • Human services funding Kent will join others in working to preserve these funds • Mobile home park: Kent has expressed concerns with prior-Session legislative efforts to mandate a 24-months' advance notice requirement for the sale or change of use of a mobile home park The city's concern is that this imposes an unfair burden on the property owner, and the city would register that concern again if legislation arises. LEOFF/PERS/Employee Services Issues "Track/Monitor" • Kent will oppose expansion of leave programs that add costs, burdens • Kent will oppose expansions to LEOFF and pension programs that add costs, burdens • Kent will oppose changes to Workers' Compensation and "presumptive illness" laws that add costs, burdens • Kent will support legislative initiatives to limit local liability • Kent will oppose legislation that would add liability exposure— including areas such as "recreational immunity" and offender supervision • LEOFF 1 retirees: Kent has a few remaining active LEOFF 1 employees, and numerous LEOFF 1 retirees, who are required under law to have their medical costs covered Like many other cities, Kent continues to hope there could be a way for the State to assist in addressing the medical costs for LEOFF 1 Kent will work through AWC in this area. 2010 City of Kent Legislative Priorities Parks and Recreation "Support/Oppose' • Authority to trap moles and rodents on public property Kent will track 2010 legislation, if it is advanced, to provide cities and counties with explicit authority to trap rodents such as gophers and moles that can cause major damage to public property if left unchecked This issue has added importance for 2010 because moles can cause damage to, and create holes in, levee facilities • "Dark skies" legislation: Kent will join other parks officials in opposing any legislation that would attempt to mandate certain shutoff times for ballfield lighting in the name of assuring 'dark skies' for astronomers The city believes this is a local- control issue, best worked out between a jurisdiction and its residents Telecommunications "Support/Oppose" • Oppose statewide franchise fee authority: During the last three Sessions, telecommunications companies have approached the Legislature, seeking enactment of a statewide franchising structure for cable and video services Kent will join AWC in strongly opposing this attack on local control Transportation/Tra n s i t "Support/Oppose" • Transit/CTR funding and/or options: In 2010, transit agencies may approach the Legislature, recommending that the state be more of a partner in funding local transit Kent supports enhanced state funding and/or options for transit, as well as for Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) programs "Track/Monitor" • Transportation Benefit Districts (TBDs): Kent will track 2010 legislative initiatives that involve refining, and possibly expanding, the "TBD" statute Water Resources "Support/Oppose" Local options for cities to collect utility tax off of water supplied inside its corporate city limits by special districts — in exchange for assuring districts that any future `assumption' effort will require voter approval: The City of Renton and the Skyway Water & Sewer District are looking at bring this kind of a mutual-benefit local-option package to the 2010 Legislature If the agencies do so, Kent will be prepared to support this legislative initiative 2010 City of Kent 8 Legislative Priorities "Track/Monitor" • Potential reworking of 2003 Municipal Water Law With a constitutional lawsuit pending against the 2003 Municipal Water Law, it is possible that certain lawmakers may seek a legislative fix to this issue in 2009 Kent would strongly oppose any modification to the law in terms of perfecting water rights and flexible "place of use" for delivering water These are key pillars within the law for Kent • Reclaimed Water legislation: Kent will track legislation related to reclaimed water. 4 2010 City of Kent Legislative Priorities 9 Kent City Council Meeting Date November 17, 2009 Category Public Hearings - 5A 1. SUBJECT: 2010 OPERATING BUDGET (SECOND HEARING) 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: This date has been set for the second public hearing of the 2010 Operating Budget. Public input is welcome. 1 ' 3. EXHIBITS: None 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Finance Director ' (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? N/A Revenue? N/A Currently in the Budget? Yes No ' 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: A. Councrtmemb r moves, Councilmember seconds t close th ublic hearing. ' B. Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: r rKent City Council Meeting Date November 17, 2009 rCategory Public Hearings - 513 ' 1. SUBJECT: 2010-2015 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (SECOND HEARING) AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS r 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: This date has been set for the second public hearing of the 2010-2015 Capital Improvement Plan and Comprehensive Plan Amendments. Public input is welcome. 1 1 ' 3. EXHIBITS: 2010-2015 Capital Improvement Plan Report, Addendum to the Kent Comprehensive Plan Environmental Impact Statement, and Adoption of existing Environmental documents 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Finance Director ' (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? N/A Revenue? N/A Currently in the Budget? Yes _ No r6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: A. Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds to close the public hearing. ' B. Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds 1 ' DISCUSSION: ACTION: 1 i a 2010 - 2015 Capital Improvement Program Sources of Funds Amounts in 000's ' Grants Other Sources 6% 4% Capital Facilities Fund Improvement Fund 4% e _ 23% h Street Fund 7% Utility Funds 56% ' Sources of Funds 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total ' Capital Improvement Fund 1,467 2,427 3,542 4,142 5,867 6,418 23,863 Street Fund 885 989 1,089 1,189 1,389 1,735 7,276 Utility Funds 8,230 8,385 8,910 9,440 10,675 10,985 56,625 ' Facilities Fund 780 700 700 700 650 700 4,230 Grants 30 5 655 3,105 1,905 5,700 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - ' Sources To Be Determined 10 121 121 3,271 291 146 3,960 Total Sources of Funds 11,372 12,652 14,367 19,397 21,977 21,889 101,654 2010 - 2015 Capital Improvement Program , Projects Forecast Amounts in 000's , Transportation 7% Public Safety ' _ 5% Parks, Recreation & \ Community Services 22% Utility Fund Projects 56% _ t. General Government ' 10% Projects 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total ' Transportation 885 989 1,089 1,189 1,389 1,735 7,276 Public Safety 367 387 1,252 1,142 577 1,595 5,320 ' Parks, Recreation 335 881 1,351 5,836 7,621 6,774 22,798 & Community Services General Government 1,555 2,010 1,765 1,790 1,715 800 9,635 ' Utility Fund Projects 8,230 8,385 8,910 9,440 10,675 10,985 56,625 Total Projects 11,372 12,652 14,367 19,397 21,977 21,889 101,654 , ' General Government 2010 - 2015 Capital Improvement Program Amounts in Thousands - Total 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Sources of Funds CIP Revenues 5,405 775 1,310 1,065 1,090 1,065 100 ' Facilities Revenues 4,230 780 700 700 - 700 650 700 Total Sources of Funds 9,635 1,555 2,01_0 1,765 1,790 _1,715 800 Projects Funded Facilities ' Emergency Facility Repairs(Lifecycle) 850 100 150 150 150 150 150 Roof Repairs(Lifecycle) 1,580 380 250 250 250 200 250 HVAC Lifecycle Replacements(Lifecycle) 1,800 300 300 300 300 300 300 Centennial Center Upgrades 160 40 40 40 40 Senior Center Upgrades 40 40 Golf Course Improvements 75 25 25 25 ' Parks Maintenance Renovation 30 30 Kent Pool Improvements 25 25 ' Facilities Improvements 100 100 Technology Software Business System Replacements 2,500 500 500 500 500 500 Hardware Lifecycle Replacements 2,100 150 600 450 450 450 Other General Government Neighborhood Programs 375 75 75 75 75 75 Total Projects Funded 9,635 1,555 2,010 1 765 1,790 __1,715 800 Public Safety , 2010 - 2015 Capital Improvement Program Amounts in Thousands ' -Total 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Sources of Funds CIP Revenues 5,320 367 387 1,252 1,142 577 1,595 Total Sources of Funds 5 320 _ 367 387 1,252 1,142 _577 1,595 ' Projects Funded Technology ' Public Safety MDC Replacements 975 195 195 195 195 195 Fire and Emergency Services , Exhaust Extraction Systems 20 20 Security Fences 97 62 35 Breathing Apparatus Replacement Program 860 172 172 172 172 172 Fire Equipment Replacement Fund 440 110 110 110 110 Replacement of Thermal Imaging Cameras 133 133 Replacement Radio Fund 525 525 , Police Services CKCF Renovation 1,300 1,300 Reader Board Speed Signs Protect 25 25 Robotic Laser Scanning Total Station 50 50 Ergonomic Work Stations 90 90 Portable Radios-Replacement 200 100 50 50 Crime Scene Van Replacemnt/Equip Upgrade 75 75 Pursuit Intervention Technique Equipment 25 25 ' Satellite Processing of Traffic NOls 170 100 70 AR-15 Rifles 75 75 Police/Fire Training Center , Training Center Classroom Upgrades 25 25 Citywide Driving Simulator 150 150 ' Other Public Safety Annex Furniture Upgrades 25 25 Work Crew Van/Trailer Equipment 60 60 — Total Projects Funded _5,320 367 387 1,252 1 142 577 1,595 ' Transportation 2010 - 2015 Capital Improvement Program Amounts in Thousands ' Total 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Sources of Funds Street Revenues 7,276 885 989 1,089 1,189 1,389 1,735 Total Sources of Funds 7,276 885 989 1 089 1,189 1,389 1,735 Projects Funded Intersections Willis and Central 500 500 ' Other Transportation Sidewalk Rehabilitation and Installation 1,800 300 300 300 300 300 300 Miscellaneous Asphalt Overlays 2,500 500 500 500 500 500 Neighborhood Traffic Control 300 50 50 50 50 50 50 Shopper Shuttle 210 35 35 35 35 35 35 Street Channelization Program 445 89 89 89 89 89 Pavement Rating Survey 75 15 15 15 15 15 Miscellaneous Street Protects 1,446 100 200 400 746 Total Projects Funded 7,276 885 =989 1,089 1,189 1,389 1,735 1 Parks, Rec & Comm Services ' 2010 - 2015 Capital Improvement Program Amounts in Thousands ' Total 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Sources of Funds WA State Grant 5,600 600 3,100 1,900 King County Grant 50 50 Other Grant 50 30 5 5 5 5 Donations/Contributions 75 15 15 15 15 15 CIP Revenues 1,050 25 25 100 300 300 300 CIP REET2 Revenues 12,088 300 705 1,125 1,610 3,925 4,423 Source To Be Determined 3,885 10 106 106 3,256 276 131 , Total Sources of Funds 22,798 335 881 1,351 5,836 7,621 6,774 Projects Funded , Community Parks Mill Creek/Greenway Plan&Renovation 650 50 250 350 Valley Floor Athletic Complex Acq &Dev 500 500 , Riverwalk/Rwerwew Park Development 130 130 Urban Forestry Program 75 35 10 10 10 10 Downtown Gateways, Phase 2 450 150 150 150 Kent Parks Foundation 150 25 25 25 25 25 25 Adopt-A-Park Volunteer Program 225 65 40 40 40 40 ' Van Doren's Park Improvements 300 300 Service Club Community Park 200 200 Clark Lake Development 1,050 50 1,000 ' Wilson Playfields Acquisition/Renovation 500 500 Major Entries into Kent 150 50 50 50 Lake Meridian Park Ren & Master Plan 1,300 1,300 Regional/Local Dog Off Leash Park 450 100 350 Eagle Creek Park Development 1,000 1,000 , Life Cycle -Trails 60 10 10 10 10 10 10 West Fenwick Park Renovation 1,585 85 1,500 Community Sports Fields 4,500 3,800 200 500 ' Lifecycle Renovations Life Cycle-Play Equipment 275 125 50 50 50 Life Cycle-Ballfields 175 100 25 25 25 ' Life Cycle-Irrigation 150 75 25 25 25 Life Cycle-Infield Soil 150 75 25 25 25 Event Center Lifecycle 1,800 300 300 300 300 300 300 Life Cycle Park System 1,730 346 346 346 346 346 Neighborhood Parks Parks, Rec & Comm Services 2010 - 2015 Capital Improvement Program Amounts in Thousands Total 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Tudor Square Renovations 68 68 132nd Street Park Development 2,100 100 1,700 300 ' West Hill Park Development 1,920 100 1,820 S 272nd St Neighborhood Park Develop. 100 100 Planning, Architect, Engineer Comprehensive Park&Recreation Plan 30 5 25 Lake Fenwick Park Improvements 350 150 200 Master Plans 150 50 25 25 25 25 Arch dect/Engineenng 40 10 10 10 10 Other Parks, Rec & Comm Svc Grant Matching Funds/Land Acq 300 75 75 75 75 Eagle Scout Volunteer Program 185 45 35 35 35 35 Total Projects Funded 22,798 335 881 -Al 351 5,836 7,621 6,774 I i Utilities 2010 - 2015 Capital Improvement Program Amounts in Thousands ' Total 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Sources of Funds Water Revenues 18,030 3,500 2,280 2,375 2,375 3,750 3,750 Sewer Revenues 5,100 1,500 1,600 500 500 500 500 Drainage Revenues 33,495 3,230 4,505 6,035 6,565 6,425 6,735 Total Sources of Funds 56,625 8,230 8,385 8 910 9,440 10,675 _10,985 Projects Funded Stormwater Management , NPDES 1,490 230 240 240 250 260 270 Miscellaneous Drainage Improvement 1,325 265 265 265 265 265 Drainage Infrastructure Replacements 12,100 1,500 2,000 2,500 2,900 3,200 Lake Fenwick 500 500 Miscellaneous Habitat Improvements 1,080 530 550 Green River Levee Repair 17,000 3,000 2,500 2,500 3,000 3,000 3,000 , Sanitary Sewer Miscellaneous Sewer Replacements 5,100 1,500 1,600 500 500 500 500 ' Water Supply & Distribution Miscellaneous Water improvements 8,750 1,750 1,750 1,750 1,750 1,750 3 5MG East Hill Reservoir 3,500 3,500 Tacoma Pipeline 5,780 530 625 625 2,000 2,000 Total Projects Funded 56,625 8,230 8,385 8,910 9,440 10,675 10,985 ECONOMIC and COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Ben Wolters, Director PLANNING SERVICES Fred N. Satterstrom, AICP, Planning Director Charlene Anderson, AICP, Manager KENT Phone: 253-856-5454 WASHINOTON Fax: 253-856-6454 iAddress: 220 Fourth Avenue S Kent, WA 98032-5895 CITY OF KENT ADDENDUM TO THE KENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Responsible Official: Charlene Anderson SCOPE ' The City of Kent has completed environmental analysis, pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), for an amendment of the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan to include the City's 2010-2015 Capital ' Improvement Plan (CIP). This amendment to the Capital Facilities Element is occurring concurrently with the adoption of the City's 2010 operating budget as provided by RCW 36.70A.130. The GMA requires cities and counties to approve and maintain a six (6) year capital facilities plan which includes requirements for specific types of capital facilities, measurable levels-of-service (LOS) standards, financial feasibility, and assurance that adequate facilities are provided as population and employment growth occurs. Kent's annual budget document and six-year ' CIP fulfill the GMA requirement for facilities planning. In addition, these documents serve as a foundation for the city's fiscal management and eligibility for grants and loans. The CIP and annual budget, along with the ' Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan provide coordination among the city's many plans for capital improvements. The annual budget and six-year CIP contain broad goals and specific financial policies that guide and implement the provisions for adequate public services and facilities. The six-year CIP is a funding mechanism to implement projects and programs identified in the City's Comprehensive Plan. Specifically, the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan contains goals and policies related to the provision and maintenance of public services and ' capital facilities which are necessary to support the projected growth over the next twenty (20) years. The goals and policies of the Capital Facilities Element are consistent with the Land Use, Transportation and Parks and Open Space Elements. The Comprehensive Plan EIS, draft and final, evaluated the growth potential as identified in the City's Comprehensive Plan. The adoption of the six-year CIP concurrently with the city's annual budget is consistent with the i Comprehensive Plan EIS - Addendum Capital Improvement Program 2010-2015 Comprehensive Plan EIS analysis as the types of projects and programs ' identified in the CIP are specifically related to the growth projections in the Comprehensive Plan and EIS. , SEPA COMPLIANCE In October 1993, the City of Kent issued a Determination of Significance (DS) and Notice of Scoping for the Comprehensive Plan (ENV-93-51). After a series of public meetings, a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) was issued on July 18, 1994 for the Draft Comprehensive Plan, issued on the same date. The DEIS was distributed to City Council and Planning , Commission members, adjacent jurisdictions, affected agencies and other parties of interest. After comments on the DEIS were solicited and reviewed, a Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) was issued and distributed on January 30, 1995. This Addendum to the Kent Comprehensive Plan EIS evaluates the adoption ' of the six-year CIP. No additional impacts are identified since the CIP implements projects and programs identified and evaluated in the City's Comprehensive Plan and Comprehensive Plan EIS. STATEMENT OF CONSISTENCY , Future projects associated with the CIP will be subject to and shall be consistent with the following: City of Kent Comprehensive Plan, the Kent City Code, International Fire Code, International Building Code, Public Works , Standards and all other applicable laws and ordinances in effect at the time a complete project permit application is filed. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW - BACKGROUND The City of Kent has followed the process of phased environmental review as it undertakes actions to implement the Comprehensive Plan. The State , Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and rules established for the act, WAC 197- 11, outline procedures for the use of existing environmental documents and preparing addenda to environmental decisions. ' Nonproject Documents - An EIS prepared for a comprehensive plan, development regulation, or other broad based policy documents are considered "non-project," or programmatic in nature (see WAC 197-11-704). These are distinguished from EISs or environmental documents prepared for specific project actions, such as a building permit or a road construction ' project. The purpose of a non-project EIS is to analyze proposed alternatives and to provide environmental consideration and mitigation prior to adoption of an alternative. It is also a document that discloses the process used in evaluating alternatives to decision-makers and citizens. Phased Review - SEPA rules allow environmental review to be phased so that ' review coincides with meaningful points in the planning and decision making process, (WAC 197-11-060(5)). Broader environmental documents may be followed by narrower documents that incorporate general discussion by reference and concentrate solely on issues specific to that proposal. SEPA Page 2 of 4 j Comprehensive Plan EIS - Addendum Capital Improvement Program 2010-2015 rules also clearly state that agencies shall use a variety of mechanisms, including addenda, adoption and incorporation by reference, to avoid duplication and excess paperwork. Future projects identified and associated with the implementation of the Capital Improvement Program may require individual and separate environmental review, pursuant to SEPA. Such review will occur when a specific project is identified. Prior Environmental Documents - The City of Kent issued a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for the Comprehensive Plan on July 18, 1994 (#ENV-93-51). The DEIS analyzed three comprehensive plan land use alternatives, and recommended mitigation measures, which were used in preparing comprehensive plan policies. The preferred land use alternative which was incorporated into the Comprehensive Plan was most closely related to Alternative 2 of the DEIS, (the mixed-use alternative). A Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) was issued on January 30, 1995, and the Comprehensive Plan was adopted by the City Council on April 18, 1995. ' Scope of Addendum - As outlined in the SEPA rules, the purpose of an addendum is to provide environmental analysis with respect to the described ' actions. This analysis builds upon the Comprehensive Plan EIS but does not substantially change the identified impacts and analysis; therefore it is prudent to utilize the addendum process as outlined in WAC-197-11- I600(4)(c). ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS All environmental elements were adequately addressed within the parameters of the City of Kent Comprehensive Plan EIS, draft and final. Further, subsequent "project" actions would require the submittal of separate ' environmental checklists, pursuant to SEPA, which will be analyzed for consistency with the original mitigating conditions and may require new mitigation based upon site-specific conditions. The adoption of the six-year CIP implements goals and policies identified in the City's Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan. Specifically, ' the CIP implements the following: Goal CF-1 - As the City of Kent continues to grow and develop, ensure that an adequate supply and range of public services and capital facilities are available to provide satisfactory standards of public health, safety, and quality of life. Policy CF1.2 - Ensure that public services and capital facilities needs are addressed in updates to the Capital Facilities Plans and Capital Improvement Programs, and development regulations as appropriate. Goal CF-4 - Ensure that appropriate funding sources are available to acquire or bond for the provision of needed public services and facilities. Page 3 of 4 Comprehensive Plan EIS - Addendum ' Capital Improvement Program 2010-2015 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION ' SUMMARY , Kent City Code section 11.03.510 identifies plans and policies from which the City may draw substantive mitigation under the State Environmental Policy Act. This nonproject action has been evaluated in light of those substantive plans and policies as well as within the overall analysis completed for the City's Comprehensive Plan EIS. DECISION , The City of Kent Comprehensive Plan EIS, draft and final, provided analysis with regard to the implementation of the Comprehensive Plan elements, goals and policies. This Includes the implementation of the Capital Facilities Element and Capital Improvement Programs. The City has reviewed the 2010-2015 CIP and has found it to be consistent with the range, types and magnitude of impacts and corresponding mitigation outlined in the Comprehensive Plan EIS. The adoption of the six-year CIP does not substantially change any identified related impacts in the Comprehensive , Plan EIS. This analysis and subsequent addendum did not identify any new significant , impacts associated with the adoption of the 2010-2015 CIP. Therefore, this addendum, combined with the Comprehensive Plan EIS adequately evaluates potential adverse environmental impacts and provides appropriate mitigation , for this nonproject action. Based upon this analysis, a separate threshold determination is not required. This document and corresponding environmental record may be utilized in the future in conjunction with , environmental review for future projects identified in the CIP in accordance with the guidelines provided by WAC 197-11. Dated: November 9, 2009 Signature: (%v&, atz� Charlene Anderson, AICP, Responsible Official ' CA:J m\\5.\Permit\Plan\Env\2009\CIPaddendum2010-2015.doc Page 4 of 4 ' KENT WAS MI NOTON 1 ADOPTION OF EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS Adoption Document(s): EIS ' Description of current proposal: The action proposed by the City consists of the adoption of an updated Capital Improvement Program concurrent with the 2010 city operating budget. The Capital Improvement Plan is an element of the City's Comprehensive Plan. Proponent: City of Kent ' Location of proposal: The proposal is a city-wide action. Title of document(s) being adopted: City of Kent Comprehensive Plan Environmental Impact Statement Draft (July 1994) and Final (January 1995) — Prepared by the City of Kent. Description of document (or portion) being adopted: The City of Kent Comprehensive Plan EIS is being adopted in total. This document evaluated three different land use alternatives for the city. The analysis evaluated the type and range of impacts to the environment associated with each land use alternative and associated development regulations. tIf the document has been challenged (WAC 197-11-630), please describe: The document was not challenged. tDocument availability: This document is available for review at the City of Kent Planning Services office, 400 West Gowe, Kent, WA 98032 from 8:00 am to 5:00 pm. We have identified and adopted this document as being appropriate for this proposal after independent review. Along with the addendum, this document meets our environmental review needs for the current proposal and will accompany the proposal to the decisionmaker(s). 1 Name of agency adopting the document: City of Kent Contact person/Responsible Official: Charlene Anderson, AICP (253) 856-5431 Planning Manager City of Kent Community Development Dept. 220 Fourth Ave South Kent, WA 98032 Date: November 9, 2009 Signature.m S:\Permit\Plan\Env\2009\CI Pad opt2010-2015.doc ' 1 Kent City Council Meeting 1 Date November 17, 2009 Category Public Hearings - 5C 1. SUBJECT: 2009 TAX LEVY FOR 2010 BUDGET ' 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: This date has been set as the public hearing for the 2009 Tax Levy for the 2010 budget. Public input is welcome. i 3. EXHIBITS: None 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Finance Director (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? N/A Revenue? N/A Currently in the Budget? Yes _ No I6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: A. Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds to close the public hearing. fB. Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: 1 Kent City Council Meeting Date November 17, 2009 Category Public Hearings - 5D 1. SUBJECT: KENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND AMENDMENTS TO KENT CITY CODE CHAPTER 12.13 SCHOOL IMPACT FEES 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: This public hearing will consider amendment of the Capital Facilities element of the Kent Comprehensive Plan to incorporate the updated Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent, Federal Way and Auburn School Districts. These plans propose to also amend school impact fees outlined in Kent City Code Chapter 12.13. Kent City Code requires the School Districts to submit their updated Plans annually for Council review and consideration. 3. EXHIBITS: Staff memo from Charlene Anderson dated 11/9/09 w/attachments; Kent, Federal Way, and Auburn School Districts' Capital Facilities Plans & Determinations of Nonsignificance and Environmental Checklists 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Staff (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? No Revenue? No Currently in the Budget? Yes No 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: 1 A. Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds to close the public hearing. 1 B. Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Fred N. Satterstrom, AICP, Director I PLANNING SERVICES Charlene Anderson, AICP, Manager KENT WgSHIN GTGN Phone 253 856 5454 ' Fax 253-856-6454 Address 220 Fourth Avenue S. 1 Kent, WA 98032-5895 November 9, 2009 TO: Council President Debbie Raplee and City Council Members FROM: Charlene Anderson, AICP, Planning Manager SUBJECT: Kent Comprehensive Plan and Kent City Code Chapter 12 13 Amendments, School District Capital Facilities Plans-Impact Fees MOTION: None at this time. This issue will be decided concurrently with adoption 1 of the 2010 Annual Budget and 2010-15 Capital Improvement Program. SUMMARY: This public hearing will consider amendment of the Capital Facilities Element of the Kent Comprehensive Plan to incorporate the updated Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent, Federal Way and Auburn School Districts. These plans propose to also amend school impact fees outlined in Kent City Code Chapter 12.13. Kent City Code requires the School Districts to submit their updated Plans annually for Council review and consideration. The City Council holds the public hearing on the school district plans at the same time as the public hearing for the budget, i.e., November 17, 2009. The City of Kent 6-year Capital Improvement Program being considered this evening also will update the Capital Facilities Element of the Kent Comprehensive Plan. rBUDGET IMPACT: None BACKGROUND: One of the planning goals under the Growth Management Act (RCW 36.70A.020) is to ensure that those public facilities and services necessary to support development are adequate and timely to serve the development without decreasing current service levels below minimum standards. The Act (RCW 36.70A.070) requires the Capital Facilities Element of the Kent Comprehensive Plan to inventory existing capital facilities, forecast future needs and provide for financing of those facilities. RCW 82.02.050 authorizes cities ' planning under the Growth Management Act to impose impact fees on development activity as part of the financing for public facilities needed to serve new growth and development. As a result, KCC 12.13.080 and 090 provide for imposition of school impact fees on behalf of any 1 school district which provides to the City a capital facilities plan; the plan is adopted by reference as part of the Capital Facilities Element of the Kent Comprehensive Plan. The school districts are required to submit for annual Council review their updated capital facilities plans (KCC 12.13.060 & 070). The Kent, Federal Way and Auburn School Districts submitted their 2009/10 — 2014/15 Capital Facilities Plans and are requesting amendments of the Kent Comprehensive Plan and Kent City Code Chapter 12.13 to reflect changes to impact fees resulting from new student population generated by new single family and multifamily residential development. The updated plans include an inventory of existing facilities, existing facility needs, expected future facility requirements, expected funding, and calculation of the impact fees according to the formula set forth In KCC 12.13.140 The Kent School District proposes to increase their existing school impact fees for single family units from $5,304 to $5,394 (an Increase of $90 or 1.7%) and for multifamily units from $3,266 to $3,322 (an Increase of $56 or 1.7%). The Federal Way School District proposes to decrease their existing school Impact fees for single family units from $4,017 to $3,832 (a decrease of $185 or 4.6%) and Increase their fees for multifamily units from $1,733 to $2,114 (an Increase of $381 or 22.0%). The Auburn School District proposes to Increase their existing school Impact fees for single , family units from $5,374.64 to $5,432.70 (an Increase of $58.06 or 1.1%) and Increase their fees for multifamily units from $877.02 to $1,184.71 (an Increase of $307.69 or 35.1%). The only area In Kent where Auburn School District's Impact fees are applied Is the Verdana or Bridges PUD on the former Impoundment reservoir site. Included with this memo are comparison tables among the three school districts as well as historical data on the school Impact fees. CA\pm S\Permit\Plan\COMP_PLAN_AMENDMENTs\2009\CPA-2009-2_schlDistnctsCapFacPlansUpdates\CityCounnl\CPA-2009-2_mpfaolities1117o9 doc Eric School Districts'Capital Facilities Plans Determinations of Nonsignificance Environmental Checklists RCW 36 70A 020&070, RCW 82 02 050 KCC 12 13 060-090, KCC 12 13 140 Comparison Tables and Historical Data cc, Ben Wolters, Economic&Community Development Director Fred N Satterstrom,AICP, Planning Director Charlene Anderson,AICP, Planning Manager Project File Parties of Record I Comprehensive Plan/Capital Facilities Element Amendment&Update to Chapter 12 13 Kent City Code 11/17/09 City Council Meeting Page 2 of 2 1 RCWs>Title 36 >Chapter 36 70A>Section 36 70A 020 36 70A 011 c< 36 70A 020 » 36 70A 030 RCW 36.70A.020 Plana*ng goals. The following goals are adopted to guide the development and adoption of comprehensive plans and development regulations of those counties and cities that are required or choose to plan under RCW 36 70A 040 The following goals are not listed in order of priority and shall be used exclusively for the purpose of guiding the development of comprehensive plans and development regulations I (1) Urban growth Encourage development in urban areas where adequate public facilities and services exist or can be provided in an efficient manner (2) Reduce sprawl Reduce the inappropriate conversion of undeveloped land into sprawling, low-density development (3)Transportation Encourage efficient multimodal transportation systems that are based on regional prionties and 1 coordinated with county and city comprehensive plans (4)Housing Encourage the availability of affordable housing to all economic segments of the population of this state, promote a variety of residential densities and housing types, and encourage preservation of existing housing 1 stock (5)Economic development Encourage economic development throughout the state that is consistent with adopted comprehensive plans, promote economic opportunity for all citizens of this state, especially for unemployed and for disadvantaged persons, promote the retention and expansion of existing businesses and recruitment of new businesses, recognize regional differences impacting economic development opportunities, and encourage growth in areas experiencing insufficient economic growth, all within the capacities of the state's natural resources, public services, and public facilities (6)Property rights Private property shall not be taken for public use without lust compensation having been made The property rights of landowners shall be protected from arbitrary and discriminatory actions (7)Permits Applications for both state and local government permits should be processed in a timely and fair manner to ensure predictability (8) Natural resource industries Maintain and enhance natural resource-based industries, Including productive timber, agricultural, and fisheries industries Encourage the conservation of productive forest lands and productive agricultural lands, and discourage Incompatible uses (9)Open space and recreation Retain open space,enhance recreational opportunities, conserve fish and wildlife habitat, increase access to natural resource lands and water, and develop parks and recreation facilities (10)Environment Protect the environment and enhance the state's high quality of life, including air and water quality, and the availability of water 1 (11)Citizen participation and coordination Encourage the involvement of citizens in the planning process and ensure coordination between communities and jurisdictions to reconcile conflicts 1 (12)Public facilities and services Ensure that those public facilities and services necessary to support development shall be adequate to serve the development at the time the development is available for occupancy and use without decreasing current service levels below locally established minimum standards 1 (13) Historic preservation Identify and encourage the preservation of lands,sites, and structures,that have historical or archaeological significance i2002c 154 51 1990 1eexs c 17§21 S\Perm0plan\COMP_PLAN_AMENDMENTS\2009\CPA-2009-2_SchlDiAnc CapFacPlansUpdates\RCW3670A 020PIanningGoals11-17-09CC doc RCWs>Title 36>Chapter 36 70A>Section 36 70A 070 36 70A 060 << 36 70A 070 » 36 70A 080 RCW 36.70A.070 Comprehensive plans — Mandatory elements. The comprehensive plan of a county or city that is required or chooses to plan under RCW 36 70A 040 shall consist of a map or maps, and descriptive text covering objectives, principles, and standards used to develop the comprehensive plan The plan shall be an internally consistent document and all elements shall be consistent with the future land use map A comprehensive plan shall be adopted and amended with public participation as provided in RCW 36 70A 140 Each comprehensive plan shalt include a plan, scheme,or design for each of the following (1)A land use element designating the proposed general distribution and general location and extent of the uses of land,where appropriate, for agriculture, timber production, housing, commerce, industry, recreation, open spaces, general aviation airports, public utilities, public facilities, and other land uses The land use element shall include population densities, building intensities, and estimates of future population growth The land use element shall provide for protection of the quality and quantity of groundwater used for public water supplies Wherever possible, the land use element should consider utilizing urban planning approaches that promote physical activity Where applicable,the land use element shall review drainage,flooding, and storm water run-off in the area and nearby jurisdictions and provide guidance for corrective actions to mitigate or cleanse those discharges that pollute waters of the state, including Puget Sound or waters entering Puget Sound (2)A housing element ensuring the vitality and character of established residential neighborhoods that (a) Includes an inventory and analysis of existing and projected housing needs that identifies the number of housing units necessary to manage projected growth, (b)includes a statement of goals, policies, objectives, and mandatory provisions for the preservation, improvement, and development of housing, including single-family residences, (c) identifies sufficient land for housing, including, but not limited to, government-assisted housing, housing for low- income families, manufactured housing, multifamily housing, and group homes and foster care facilities, and (d) makes adequate provisions for existing and projected needs of all economic segments of the community (3)A capital facilities plan element consisting of (a)An inventory of existing capital facilities owned by public entities, showing the locations and capacities of the capital facilities, (b)a forecast of the future needs for such capital ' facilities, (c)the proposed locations and capacities of expanded or new capital facilities, (d)at least a six-year plan that will finance such capital facilities within projected funding capacities and clearly identifies sources of public money for such purposes, and (e)a requirement to reassess the land use element if probable funding falls short of meeting existing needs and to ensure that the land use element, capital facilities plan element, and financing plan within the capital facilities plan element are coordinated and consistent Park and recreation facilities shall be included in the capital facilities plan element (4)A utilities element consisting of the general location, proposed location, and capacity of all existing and proposed utilities, including, but not limited to, electrical lines, telecommunication lines, and natural gas Imes. (5)Rural element Counties shall include a rural element including lands that are not designated for urban growth, agriculture, forest, or mineral resources The following provisions shall apply to the rural element (a) Growth management act goals and local circumstances Because circumstances vary from county to county, in establishing patterns of rural densities and uses, a county may consider local circumstances, but shall develop a written record explaining how the rural element harmonizes the planning goals in RCW 36 70A 020 and meets the requirements of this chapter (b)Rural development The rural element shall permit rural development,forestry, and agriculture in rural areas The rural element shall provide for a variety of rural densities, uses, essential public facilities, and rural governmental services needed to serve the permitted densities and uses To achieve a variety of rural densities and uses, counties may provide for clustering, density transfer, design guidelines, conservation easements, and other innovative techniques that will accommodate appropriate rural densities and uses that are not characterized by urban growth and that are consistent with rural character (c)Measures governing rural development The rural element shall include measures that apply to rural ! development and protect the rural character of the area, as established by the county, by (i) Containing or otherwise controlling rural development, (it)Assuring visual compatibility of rural development with the surrounding rural area, (ui)Reducing the inappropriate conversion of undeveloped land into sprawling,low-density development in the rural area, (iv)Protecting critical areas, as provided in RCW 36 70A 060, and surface water and groundwater resources, and (v)Protecting against conflicts with the use of agricultural,forest, and mineral resource lands designated under RCW 36 70A 170 (d)Limited areas of more intensive rural development Subject to the requirements of this subsection and except as otherwise specifically provided in this subsection (5)(d),the rural element may allow for limited areas of more intensive rural development, including necessary public facilities and public services to serve the limited area as follows (i)Rural development consisting of the infill, development, or redevelopment of existing commercial, industrial, residential,or mixed-use areas, whether characterized as shoreline development,villages, hamlets, rural activity centers,or crossroads developments (A)A commercial, industrial, residential, shoreline, or mixed-use area shall be subject to the requirements of (d)(iv)of this subsection, but shall not be subject to the requirements of(c)(iq and (uQ of this subsection (B)Any development or redevelopment other than an industrial area or an industrial use within a mixed-use area or an industrial area under this subsection (5)(d)(i)must be principally designed to serve the existing and projected rural population (C)Any development or redevelopment in terms of building size, scale, use, or intensity shall be consistent with the character of the existing areas Development and redevelopment may include changes in use from vacant land or a previously existing use so long as the new use conforms to the requirements of this subsection (5), (n)The intensification of development on lots containing, or new development of, small-scale recreational or tourist uses, including commercial facilities to serve those recreational or tourist uses,that rely on a rural location and setting, but that do not include new residential development A small-scale recreation or tourist use is not required to ' be principally designed to serve the existing and projected rural population Public services and public facilities shall be limited to those necessary to serve the recreation or tourist use and shall be provided in a manner that does not permit low-density sprawl, (di)The intensification of development on lots containing isolated nonresidential uses or new development of isolated cottage industries and isolated small-scale businesses that are not principally designed to serve the existing and projected rural population and nonresidential uses, but do provide job opportunities for rural residents Rural counties may allow the expansion of small-scale businesses as long as those small-scale businesses conform with the rural character of the area as defined by the local government according to`RCW :36 704 030(14) Rural counties may also allow new small-scale businesses to utilize a site previously occupied by an existing business as long as the new small-scale business conforms to the rural character of the area as defined by the local government according to`RCW 36 70A 030(14) Public services and public facilities shall be limited to those necessary to serve the isolated nonresidential use and shall be provided in a manner that does not permit low-density sprawl, (iv)A county shall adopt measures to minimize and contain the existing areas or uses of more intensive rural development,as appropriate,authorized under this subsection Lands included in such existing areas or uses shall not extend beyond the logical outer boundary of the existing area or use,thereby allowing a new pattern of low- density sprawl Existing areas are those that are clearly identifiable and contained and where there is a logical boundary delineated predominately by the built environment, but that may also include undeveloped lands if limited as provided in this subsection The county shall establish the logical outer boundary of an area of more intensive rural development In establishing the logical outer boundary the county shall address (A)the need to preserve the character of existing natural neighborhoods and communities, (B)physical boundaries such as bodies of water, streets and highways, and land forms and contours, (C)the prevention of abnormally irregular boundaries, and (D) the ability to provide public facilities and public services in a manner that does not permit low-density sprawl, (v)For purposes of(d)of this subsection, an existing area or existing use is one that was in existence (A)On July 1, 1990, in a county that was initially required to plan under all of the provisions of this chapter, (B)On the date the county adopted a resolution under RCW 36 70A 040(2), in a county that is planning under all of the provisions of this chapter under RCW 36 70A 040(2), or (C)On the date the office of financial management certifies the county's population as provided in RCW 36 70A 040(5), in a county that is planning under all of the provisions of this chapter pursuant to RCW 36 70A 040(5) (e)Exception This subsection shall not be interpreted to permit in the rural area a major industrial development or a master planned resort unless otherwise specifically permitted under RCW 36 70A 360 and 36 70A 365 (6)A transportation element that implements, and is consistent with,the land use element (a)The transportation element shall include the following subelements (i)Land use assumptions used in estimating travel, (u) Estimated traffic impacts to state-owned transportation facilities resulting from land use assumptions to assist the department of transportation in monitoring the performance of state facilities, to plan improvements for the facilities,and to assess the impact of land-use decisions on state-owned transportation facilities, (w) Facilities and services needs, including (A)An inventory of air, water, and ground transportation facilities and services, including transit alignments and general aviation airport facilities, to define existing capital facilities and travel levels as a basis for future planning This inventory must include state-owned transportation facilities within the city or county's jurisdictional boundaries, (B)Level of service standards for all locally owned arterials and transit routes to serve as a gauge to judge performance of the system These standards should be regionally coordinated, (C)For state-owned transportation facilities, level of service standards for highways, as prescribed in chapters 47 06 and 47 80 RCW,to gauge the performance of the system The purposes of reflecting level of service standards for state highways in the local comprehensive plan are to monitor the performance of the system, to evaluate improvement strategies, and to facilitate coordination between the county's or city's six-year street, road, or transit program and the department of transportation's six-year investment program The concurrency requirements of(b)of this subsection do not apply to transportation facilities and services of statewide significance except for counties consisting of islands whose only connection to the mainland are state highways or ferry routes In these island counties, state highways and ferry route capacity must be a factor in meeting the concurrency requirements in (b)of this subsection, (D)Specific actions and requirements for bringing into compliance locally owned transportation facilities or services that are below an established level of service standard, (E) Forecasts of traffic for at least ten years based on the adopted land use plan to provide information on the location,timing, and capacity needs of future growth; 1 (F) Identification of state and local system needs to meet current and future demands Identified needs on state- owned transportation facilities must be consistent with the statewide multimodal transportation plan required under chapter 47 06 RCW, (iv)Finance, including (A)An analysis of funding capability to judge needs against probable funding resources, (B)A multiyear financing plan based on the needs identified in the comprehensive plan,the appropriate parts of which shall serve as the basis for the six-year street, road, or transit program required by RCW 35 77 010 for cities, RCW 36 81 121 for counties, and RCW 35 58 2795 for public transportation systems The multiyear financing plan should be coordinated with the six-year improvement program developed by the department of transportation as required by"RCW 47 05 030, (C)If probable funding falls short of meeting identified needs, a discussion of how additional funding will be raised, or how land use assumptions will be reassessed to ensure that level of service standards will be met, (v)Intergovernmental coordination efforts, including an assessment of the impacts of the transportation plan and land use assumptions on the transportation systems of adjacent jurisdictions, (vi)Demand-management strategies, (vu) Pedestrian and bicycle component to include collaborative efforts to identify and designate planned improvements for pedestrian and bicycle facilities and corridors that address and encourage enhanced community access and promote healthy lifestyles (b)After adoption of the comprehensive plan by jurisdictions required to plan or who choose to plan under RCW 36 70A 040, local jurisdictions must adopt and enforce ordinances which prohibit development approval if the development causes the level of service on a locally owned transportation facility to decline below the standards adopted in the transportation element of the comprehensive plan, unless transportation improvements or strategies to accommodate the impacts of development are made concurrent with the development These strategies may include increased public transportation service, ride sharing programs,demand management, and other transportation systems management strategies For the purposes of this subsection (6)"concurrent with the development"shall mean that improvements or strategies are in place at the time of development, or that a financial commitment is in place to complete the improvements or strategies within six years (c)The transportation element described in this subsection(6), and the six-year plans required by RCW 35 77 010 for cities, RCW 36 81 121 for counties, RCW 35 58 2795 for public transportation systems, and "RCW 47 05 030 for the state, must be consistent (7)An economic development element establishing local goals, policies, objectives, and provisions for economic , growth and vitality and a high quality of life The element shall include (a)A summary of the local economy such as population, employment, payroll, sectors, businesses, sales,and other information as appropriate,(b)a summary of the strengths and weaknesses of the local economy defined as the commercial and industrial sectors and supporting factors such as land use, transportation, utilities, education, workforce, housing, and natural/cultural resources, and (c)an identification of policies, programs, and projects to foster economic growth and development and to address future needs A city that has chosen to be a residential community is exempt from the economic development element requirement of this subsection (8)A park and recreation element that implements, and is consistent with, the capital facilities plan element as it relates to park and recreation facilities The element shall include (a)Estimates of park and recreation demand for at least a ten-year period, (b)an evaluation of facilities and service needs,and (c)an evaluation of intergovernmental coordination opportunities to provide regional approaches for meeting park and recreational demand (9)It is the intent that new or amended elements required after January 1, 2002, be adopted concurrent with the scheduled update provided in RCW 36 70A 130 Requirements to incorporate any such new or amended elements shall be null and void until funds sufficient to cover applicable local government costs are appropriated and distributed by the state at least two years before local government must update comprehensive plans as required in RCW 36 70A 130 L2005 c 360§2,(2005 c 477§1 expired August 31,2005),2004 c 196§1,2003 c 152§1 Prior 2002 c 212§2,2002 c 154§2, 1998 c 171 §2, 1997 c 429§7, 1996 c 239§1,prior 1995 c 400§3, 1995 c 377§1, 1990 1st ex s c 17§7] Notes: Reviser's note.*(1)RCW 36 70A 030 was amended by 2005 c 423§2,changing subsection(14)to subsection (15) `"(2)RCW 47 05 030 was amended by 2005 c 319§9,changing the six-year improvement program to a ten-year investment program Expiration date --2005 c 477§1: "Section 1 of this act expires August 31, 2005"[2005 c 477§3 Effective date—2005 c 477: "This act is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace,health,or safety, or support of the state government and its existing public institutions, and takes effect immediately[May 13, I 20051"[2005 c 477§21 Findings--Intent --2005 c 360• "The legislature finds that regular physical activity is essential to maintaining good health and reducing the rates of chronic disease The legislature further finds that providing opportunities for walking, biking, horseback riding, and other regular forms of exercise is best accomplished through collaboration between the private sector and local, state, and institutional policymakers This collaboration can build communities where people find it easy and safe to be physically active It is the intent of the legislature to promote policy and planning efforts that increase access to inexpensive or free opportunities for regular exercise in all communities around the state"[2005 c 360§ 1 ] Prospective application --1997 c 429§§ 1-21. See note following RCW 36 70A 3201 Severability--1997 c 429• See note following RCW 36 70A 3201 Construction --Application --1995 c 400 "A comprehensive plan adopted or amended before May 16, 1995, shall be considered to be in compliance with RCW 36 70A 070 or 36 7OA 110, as in effect before their amendment by this act, if the comprehensive plan is in compliance with RCW 36 70A 070 and 36 70A 110 as amended by this act This section shall not be construed to alter the relationship between a countywide planning policy and comprehensive plans as specified under RCW 36 7OA 210 As to any appeal relating to compliance with RCW 36 70A 070 or 36 70A 110 pending before a growth management hearings board on May 16, 1995,the board may take up to an additional ninety days to resolve such appeal By mutual agreement of all parties to the appeal,this additional ninety-day period may be extended" [1995 c 400 §4] ` Effective date --1995 c 400 See note following RCW 36 70A 040 SWermihRaWCOMP PLAN AMENDMENTSj20091CPA20C9i SChIDistricisCapFaePlansUpdaLeslRCW3670A0TOCompPlansMandatoryElemll-17-09CCdoc RCW s >Title 82>Chapter 82 02 > Section 82 02 050 82 02 040 « 82 02 050 » 82 02 060 RCW 82.02.050 Impact fees — Intent — Limitations. (1)It is the intent of the legislature (a)To ensure that adequate facilities are available to serve new growth and development, (b)To promote orderly growth and development by establishing standards by which counties, cities, and towns may require, by ordinance, that new growth and development pay a proportionate share of the cost of new facilities needed to serve new growth and development, and (c)To ensure that impact fees are imposed through established procedures and criteria so that specific developments do not pay arbitrary fees or duplicative fees for the same impact (2)Counties, cities, and towns that are required or choose to plan under RCW 36 70A 040 are authorized to impose impact fees on development activity as part of the financing for public facilities, provided that the financing for system improvements to serve new development must provide for a balance between impact fees and other sources of public funds and cannot rely solely on impact fees (3)The impact fees (a)Shall only be imposed for system improvements that are reasonably related to the new development, (b)Shall not exceed a proportionate share of the costs of system improvements that are reasonably related to the new development, and (c)Shall be used for system improvements that will reasonably benefit the new development (4) Impact fees may be collected and spent only for the public facilities defined in RCW 82 02 090 which are addressed by a capital facilities plan element of a comprehensive land use plan adopted pursuant to the provisions of RCW 36 70A 070 or the provisions for comprehensive plan adoption contained in chapter 30 70, 35 63, or 35A 63 RCW After the date a county, city, or town is required to adopt its development regulations under chapter 36 70A RCW, continued authorization to collect and expend impact fees shall be contingent on the county, city, or town adopting or revising a comprehensive plan in compliance with RCW 36 70A 070, and on the capital facilities plan identifying (a)Deficiencies in public facilities serving existing development and the means by which existing deficiencies will be eliminated within a reasonable period of time, (b)Additional demands placed on existing public facilities by new development,and (c)Additional public facility improvements required to serve new development If the capital facilities plan of the county, city, or town is complete other than for the inclusion of those elements which are the responsibility of a special district, the county, city, or town may impose impact fees to address those public facility needs for which the county,city, or town is responsible �. [1994 c 257§24,1993 sp s c 6§6, 1990 1st ex s c 17§43] 1 1 Notes: Severability--1994 c 257• See note following RCW 36 70A 270 Effective date --1993 sp s.c 6: See note following RCW 36 70A 040. Severability--Part,section headings not law--1990 1st ex.s.c 17: See RCW 36 70A 900 and 36 70A 901 SEPA RCW 43 21C 065 S\Permit\Plan\COMP_PLAN_AMENDMENTS\2009\CPA-2009-2_SchlDlstnctsCapFacPlansUpdates\RCW82 02 0501mpactFeesll-17-09CC doc Chapter 12.13 SCHOOL IMPACT FEES 12.13.060 Submission of district capital facilities plan and data. A. On an annual basis, the district shall submit the following materials to the city council: 1 . The district's capital facilities plan (as defined in KCC 12 13 010 herein) and adopted by the school board, 2 The district's enrollment protections over the next six (6) years, its current enrollment and the district's enrollment projections and actual enrollment from the previous year, 3. The district's standard of service; 4. The district's overall capacity over the next six (6) years, which shall take into account the available capacity from school facilities planned by the district but not yet built and be a function of the district's standard of service as measured by the number of students which can be housed in district facilities, 5 An inventory of the district's existing facilities 1 B. To the extent that the district's standard of service identifies a deficiency in its ;existing facilities, the district's capital facilities plan must identify the sources of funding other than impact fees, for building or acquiring the necessary facilities to serve the existing student population in order to eliminate the deficiencies within a reasonable period of time. C. Facilities to meet future demand shall be designed to meet the adopted standard of service If sufficient funding is not projected to be available to fully fund a capital facilities plan which meets the adopted standard of service, the district's capital facilities plan should document the reason for the funding gap, and identify all sources of funding 'that the district plans to use to meet the adopted standard of service D. The district shall also submit an annual report to the city council showing the capital improvements which were serviced in whole or in part by the impact fees E. In its development of the financing plan component of the capital facilities plan, the district shall plan on a six (6) year horizon and shall demonstrate its best efforts by taking the following steps 1 Establish a six (6) year financing plan, and propose the necessary bond issues and levies required by and consistent with that plan and as-approved by the school board consistent with RCW 28A 53 020, 84 52 052 and 84.52 056 as amended; and 2 Apply to the state for funding, and comply with the state requirements for eligibility to the best of the district's ability (Ord No 3260, § 1, 12-19-95) 12.13.070 Annual council review. On at least an annual basis, the city council shall review the information submitted by the district pursuant to KCC 12.13 060(A) herein The review shall occur in conjunction ;with any update of the capital facilities plan element of the city's comprehensive plan. (Ord No 3260, § 1 , 12-19-95) 12.13.080 Impact fee program elements. A Impact fees will be assessed on every new dwelling unit in the district for which a fee schedule has been established B Impact fees will be imposed on a district by district basis, on behalf of any school district which provides to the city, a capital facilities plan, the district's standards of ,service for the various grade spans, estimates of the cost of providing needed facilities and other capital improvements, and the data from the district called for by the formula in KCC 12 13 140. Any impact fee imposed shall be reasonably related to the impact caused by the development, and shall not exceed a proportionate share of the cost of system improvements that are reasonably related to the development The impact fee formula shall account in the fee calculation for future revenue the district will receive from the development The ordinance adopting the fee schedule shall specify under what circumstances the fee may be adjusted in the interests of fairness C. The impact fee shall be based on the capital facilities plan developed by the district and approved by the school board, and adopted by reference by the city as part of the capital facilities element of the comprehensive plan for the purpose of establishing the fee program (Ord No 3260, § 1, 12-19-95) 12.13.090 Fee calculations. A. The fee shall be calculated based on the formula set out in KCC 12.13 140 B Separate fees shall be calculated for single-family and multifamily types of dwelling units, and separate student generation rates must be determined by the district for each type of dwelling unit For the purpose of this chapter, mobile homes shall be treated as single-family dwellings and duplexes shall be treated as multifamily dwellings. C The fee shall be calculated on a district-wide basis using the appropriate factors ;and data to be supplied by the district, as indicated in KCC 12 13 140 The fee ';calculations shall also be made on a district-wide basis to assure maximum utilization of ,all school facilities in the district used currently or within the last two (2) years for ;instructional purposes. D. The formula in KCC 12 13 140 provides a credit for the anticipated tax contributions that would be made by the developments based on historical levels of voter support for bond issues in the district E The formula also provides for a credit for school facilities or sites actually provided by a developer which the district finds acceptable. F The city may also impose an application fee to cover the reasonable costs of administration of the impact fee program (Ord No 3260, § 1, 12-19-95) 12.13.140 Formula for determining school impact fees. A School impact fees shall be determined as follows: IF- A = Student factor for dwelling unit type and grade span x site cost per student for sites for facilities in that grade span = Full cost fee for site acquisition cost B = Student factor for dwelling unit type and grade span x school construction cost per student for facilities in that grade span x ratio of district's square footage of permanent facilities to total square footage of facilities = Full cost fee for school construction C = Student factor for dwelling unit type and grade span x relocatable facilities cost per student for facilities in that grade span x ratio of district's square footage of relocatable facilities to total square footage of facilities = Full cost fee for relocatable facilities D = Student factor for dwelling unit type and grade span "Boeckh Index" x SPI square ft per student factor x state match % = State match credit, and Al, B1 , C1, D1 = A, B, C, D for elementary grade spans A2, B2, C2, D2 = A, B, C, D, for middle/junior high grade spans A3, B3, C3, D3 = A, B, C, D for high school grade spans TC = Tax payment credit = The net present value of the average assessed value in the district for unit type x current school district capital property tax levy rate, using a ten (10) year discount period and current interest rate (based on the bond buyer twenty (20) bond general obligation bond index) FC = Facilities credit = the per-dwelling-unit value of any site or facilities provided directly by the development Then the unfunded need = UN = Al + . . . + C3 (131-D2-D3) — TC And the developer fee obligation = F = U/N2 And the net fee obligation = NF = F — FC B. Notes to formula. 1 Student factors are to be provided by the district based on district records of ;average actual student generation rates for new developments constructed over a 'period of not more than five (5) years prior to the date of the fee calculation, if such information is not available in the district, data from adjacent districts, districts with similar demographics, or countywide averages must be used Student factors must be separately determined for single-family and multifamily dwelling units, and for grade spans. 2. The "Boeckh index" is a construction trade index of construction costs for various kinds of buildings, it is adjusted annually 3. The district is to provide its own site and facilities standards and projected costs to be used in the formula, consistent with the requirements of this chapter 4. The formula can be applied by using the following table: 12.13.140 Formula for determining school impact fees. Table for Calculating School Impact Fee Obligations for Residential Dwelling Units (to be separately calculated for single-family and multifamily units) Al= Elementary school site cost per student x the student factor = A2= Middle/junior high site cost per student x the student factor = A3= High school site cost per student x the student factor = I A= Al + A2 + A3 = 131= Elementary school construction cost per student x the student factor = B2= Middle/junior high construction cost per student x the student factor = B3= High school construction cost per student x the student factor = B= (131 + B2 + 133) x square footage of permanent facilities = li total square footage of facilities C1= Elementary school relocatable facility cost per student x the student factor = C2=Middle/junior high relocatable facility cost per student x the student factor C3=High school relocatable facility cost per student x the student factor = C= (Cl + C2 + C3) x square footage of permanent facilities = total square footage of facilities D1=Boeckh index x SPI square footage per student for elementary school x state match % x = student factor D2=Boeckh index x SPI square footage per student for middle/junior high school x state = match % x student factor D3=Boeckh index x SPI square footage per student for high school x state match % x student = factor D= D1 + D2 + D3 = TC=((1+1)10) - 1 x average assessed value for the dwelling unit type in the school district i(1 + 1),a x current school district capital property tax levy rate where i+ the current interest rate as stated in the bond buy twenty (20) bond general obligation bond index FC=Value of site of facilities provided directly by the development number of dwelling units in development Total unfunded need = A + B + C - D = A +13 -D Subtotal -TC Total unfunded need UN = divided by 2 = Developer fee obligation Less FC (if applicable) Net fee obligation (Ord No 3260, § 1, 12-19-95) SIPmmnai COMP PLAN_AMENDMENTS\2009\CPA-2009-2_Schl DistnctsCapFacPlansUpdates\KCC_Chl213140_SchlImpactFeesFormulall-17-09CC doc School District Capital Facilities Plans 2009/10 to 2014/15 Impact Fee Calculation - Single Family and Multifamily Kent Federal Way Auburn Site Cost SFR $ 2,346.12 $ -0- $ 1,358 53 MFR $ 1,872.68 $ -0- $ 303.88 Construction Cost SFR $29,096.85 $ 14,431 $20,089.49 MFR $17,700 95 $ 6,613 $ 4,778 11 Temporary Facility Cost SFR $ 6866 $ 56 $ 6502 MFR $ 45.67 $ 18 $ 15.61 State Match Credit SFR $ 6,769.46 $ 3,078 $ 6,567 25 MFR $ 3.866 78 $ 1.411 $ 1,622.14 Tax Credit SFR $ 4,675.66 $ 3,745 $ 4,080 39 MFR $ 1,363.29 $ 992 $ 1,10604 Impact Fee SFR S 5,394 (+ 1.7%) $ 3,832 (- 4.6%) $ 5,432.70(+ 1.1%) MFR S 3,322 (+ 1 7%) 2,114 (+22 0%) $ 11184 71(+35.1 0) % financed by fees 31 0% 1 8% ? Impact Fees History 2000 - 2010 Kent Federal Way Auburn Kent Federal Way Auburn SFR MFR 2010 $5,394 $3,832 $5,432 70 2010 $3,322 $2,114 $1,184 71 2009 5,304 4,017 5,37464 2009 3,266 1,733 877.02 2008 5,110 3,883 5361 04 2008 3,146 1,647 465 78 2007 4,928 3,018 5,657.05 2007 3,034 856 1,22884 2006 4,775 3,393 5,681.36 2006 2,940 895 1,53630 1 2005 4,056 2,868 5,296.90 1 1 2005 1,762 905 1,831.85 2004 4,292 3,269 4,52800 2004 2,643 940 1,212.00 2003 4,147 3,865 N/A 2003 2,554 11086 N/A 2002 3,782 2,616 N/A 2002 2,329 896 N/A 2001 3,782 2,710 N/A 2001 2,329 830 N/A 2000 3,782 2,384 N/A 2000 2,329 786 N/A S\Permit\Plan\COMP_PLAN-AMENDMENTS\2009�CPA-2009.2_SchlDtstrictsCapFacPlansUpdates\CPA-2009-2_capfaahttestablel dm School District Capital Facilities Plans 2009/10 to 2014/15 Kent Federal Way Auburn Area Cost Allowance S 168.79 $168.79 $168 79 State Match % 55 78% 61.09% 59 17% Distract Average AV SFR $348,876 $326,409 $316,271 MFR 121,557 86,497 85,729 Debt Service Capital Levy Rate/$1000 $1.73 $1 48 S1 67 Bond Interest Rate 4.96% 4 96% 4 99% Issues: Kent: Construct new elementary school, replace 2 elementary schools, renovate 2 middle schools, and expand 2 high schools Federal Way 2007 bond—replace 1 middle school and 4 elementary schools Consolidate support services I Auburn: 1 Elementary School site acquisition 1 Elementary School construction 1 Middle School site acquisition 1 Middle School construction 1 Special Education Transition Facility S`,Pe itTlan\COMP_PLAN_AMENDMENTS`.20D9\CPA-2009-2_SchlDistnctsCapFaePlansUpdates\CPA-2D09-2_capfacthtiestable2 doc i School District Capital Facilities Plans—2009/10 to 2014/15 General Statistics Kent Federal Way Auburn Student Generation SFR Elementary .445 3317 .3200 Middle .118 .1653 .1520 Sr High 245 .2224 .1580 MFR Elementary .296 1520 .0790 Middle .075 .0520 0340 Sr High .111 0590 0420 FTE Enrollment 2008/09 25,828 20,476 14,019 Capacity 2009/10 27,624 22,726 13,803 iClass Size K= 22 K - 2 = 20 K— 2 = 25 1-4 = 23 3 - 5 = 25 3 - 4 = 27 5 - 6= 29 6 - 12 = 26 5 =30 7 - 8 = 29 6-12 = 30 9-12 —31 (25 for 7`" & I Oh English) S Terma\PIaeCOMP_PLANAMENDMENTSQ0091CPA-2009-2_SchlDtstrictsCapFacPlansUpdatcs\CPA-2009-2_cap(amhticstable3 doc i 1 1 i „ Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN t 2009 through 2015 Adopted by the Auburn School District Board of Directors May 11, 2009 1 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 408 915 Fourth Street NE Auburn, Washington 98002 (253) 931-4900 Serving Students in Unincorporated King County City of Auburn City of Algona City of Kent City of Pacific BOARD of DIRECTORS Janice Nelson Ray Vefik Carol Helgerson Lisa Conners Craig Schumaker Dennis Kip Herren, Superintendent i 1 AUBURN SCI100L DISTRICT IlAvenue to Excellence" Table of Contents Section I Executive Summary ....................... Page 1 Section II Enrollment Projections.. ..................Page 6 Section III Standard of Service. . . .. .............. Page 8 Section IV Inventory of Facilities ............ .. ..... Page 15 Section V Pupil Capacity... . .... Page 18 Section VI Capital Construction Plan................ Page 21 Section VII Impact Fees........ ......................... Page 24 Section Vill Appendices. ....... . .. ............. ..... Page 28 Appendix A 1 - Student Enrollment Projections Page 29 ' Appendix A 2 -Capital Facilities Plan Projections Page 43 Appendix A 3- Student Generation Survey Page 48 Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2009 through 2015 Section I Executive Summary 11 Auburn School District No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2009 through 2015 1 Executive Summary This Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan")has been prepared by the Auburn School District(the "District") as the District's principal planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act and the adopted ordinances of the counties and cities served by the District. This plan was prepared using data available in the spring of 2009 This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the District However, this Plan is not intended to be the sole plan for all of the District's needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic long-range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board Policies and actions, taking into account a longer or a shorter time period; other factors and trends in the use of facilities, and other needs of the District as may be required However, any such plan or plans will be consistent with this Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan. To enable the collection of impact fees in the unincorporated areas of King County and within the City of Auburn and City of Kent, the King County Council, the City of Auburn and the City of Kent will adopt this Plan by reference as part of each jurisdiction's respective comprehensive plan. To enable the collection of impact fees in the Cities of Algona and Pacific, these municipalities must also adopt this Plan and adopt school impact fee ordinances. Pursuant to the requirements of the Growth Management Act and the local ordinances, the Plan will be updated on an annual basis, and any changes in the fee schedule(s) adjusted accordingly. The Plan establishes the District's "standard of service" in order to ascertain the District's current and future capacity. While the State Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines do not account for the local program needs of the District. The Growth Management Act and the school impact fee ordinance authorize the District to define its standard of service based on the District's specific needs. In general, the District's current standard provides that class size for grades K-2 should not exceed 25 students, class size for grades 3-4 should not exceed 27 students; class size for grade 5 should not exceed 30 students. When averaged over the six elementary grades, this computes to 26 5 students per classroom Class size for grades 6-12 should not exceed 30 students, with some subject areas restricted to lesser numbers (See Section III for more specific information.) 2 � � The capacity of the schools in the District is calculated based on this standard of service and the existing inventory of facilities including transitional classrooms. The District's 2008-09 capacity was 13,690 whereas Full Time Equivalent ("FTE") enrollment for this same period was 14,018 83 (includes Full Day Kindergarten) The actual number of individual students was 14,703 as of October 1, 2008 (See Section V for more specific information ) The capital construction plan shown in Section VI addresses the additions and proposed modernization to the District's existing facilities. This provided for a new high school approved by the voters in February 2003 and opened in September 2005, and the addition of two new elementary schools approved by the voters in February 2005, with Lakeland Hills Elementary opening in the Fall of 2006 and Arthur Jacobsen Elementary opening in the Fall of 2007 The plan includes the construction of a new middle school and a new elementary school, as well as the acquisition of future school sites to accommodate growth. The new facilities are required to meet the projected student population increase to be generated from the large development areas within the Auburn School District. Three areas that have significant impact on the school district are the Lakeland South, the Lea Hill, and the north Auburn valley areas of the district There are other pockets of development that impact the District as well The City of Kent has an area of approximately 158 acres that was sold to developers in 2004. The economic downturn has slowed development in these areas. The district completed a comprehensive review of all district facilities and in October 2008 a Steering Committee made recommendations to the board for capital improvements to existing facilities and replacement of seven schools over the next ten years These recommendations led to a capital improvements levy and a bond issue that was placed on the ballot in March 2009. The School Impact Fee Ordinances adopted by King County, the City of Auburn and the City of Kent provide for the assessment of impact fees to assist in meeting some of the fiscal impact incurred by a District experiencing growth and development Section VII sets forth the proposed school impact fees for single family and multi-family dwelling units The student generation factors have been generated using the students who actually attend school in the Auburn School District from single family and multi-family developments constructed in the last five years. The method of collecting the data is with the use of GIS mapping software. data from King County and Pierce County GIS; and to integrate the mapping with student data from the district's student data system This method gives the District actual student generation numbers for each grade span for identified developments. This data is contained in Appendix A.3. 3 Auburn School District No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2009 through 2015 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CHANGES FROM 2008 TO 2009 Listed below is a summary level outline of the changes from the 2008 Capital Facilities Plan that area part of the 2009 Plan The changes are noted by Section for ease of reference Section I Executive Summary A Updated to reflect new information within the Plan B Summary level list of changes from previous year Section II Enrollment Projections Updated projections See Appendices A 1 &A 2 Section III Standard of Service A Increase of 2 early childhood classrooms at elementary level B. Increase of 1 second grade TOSA program at elementary level ' C Reduction of 1 structured learning classroom at middle level D Increase of 2 structured learning classrooms at the high school level Section IV Inventory of Facilities Updated to include portables at Lakeland Hills Elementary for Fall of 2009 Updated to include Special Education Transition Facility for Fall of 2009 Updated to include portables at Mt Baker Middle School for Fall of 2009 Section V Pupil Capacity Updated to include portables at Lakeland Hills Elementary for Fall of 2009 Updated to include Special Education Transition Facility for Fall of 2009 Updated to include portables at Mt Baker Middle School for Fall of 2009 1 t 4 Aubum School District No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2009 through 2015 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Section VII Impact Fees CHANGES TO IMPACT FEE DATA ELEMENTS 2008 to 2009 CPF CPF DATA ELEMENTS 2008 2009 EXPLANATION Student Generation Factors Single Family Consistent with King County Ordinance 11621, Elementary 03370 03200 Student Generation Factors are calculated Mid School 01450 0 1520 by the school district based on district Sr High 0 1780 01580 records of average actual student generation Multi-Family rates for new developments constructed Elementary 00650 00790 over the last five years Mid School 00290 00340 Sr High 00390 00420 School Construction Costs Elementary $21,750,000 $21,750,000 Middle School $42,500,000 $42,500,000 Site Aquistion Costs Cost per acre $272,387 $286,006 Updated estimates on land costs Area Cost Allowance Boec $168 43 $168 79 Updated to projected SPI schedule Match % -State 59 32% 59 17% Updated to current SPI schedule i Match % - District 40 68% 40 83% Computed District Average AV Single Family $290,617 $316,271 Updated from March 2009 King County Dept of Assessments data Multi-Family $78,574 $85,729 Updated from March 2009 King County Dept of Assessments data using weighted average Debt Sery Tax Rate $1 79 $1 67 Current Fiscal Year GO Bond Int Rate 5 11% 4 99% Current Rate (Bond Buyers 20 Index 3-09) Section Vill Appendices Appendix A 1 - Updated enrollment projections from October 1, 2008 Appendix A 2 -Updated enrollment projections with anticipated buildout schedule. Appendix A 3 - Student Generation Survey March 2009 1 ' 5 Auburn School District No 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2009 through 2015 i Sectnll o Enrollment Projections 1 Aubum School District No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2009 through 2015 ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS The Auburn School District uses a modified cohort survival model to project future enrollment for all of the District's operations Table II 1 is an extract from the comprehensive projection model found in Appendix A 2 titled "CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Enrollment Projections" This Table shows the anticipated enrollment for the next six years based on the previous 6 year history of the District under the assumptions set forth in the comprehensive projections, Appendix A 1, and the projection for additional students generated from new developments in the district as shown in Appendix A 2 TABLE ASD ENROLLMENT 11.1 PROJECTIONS (March 2009) 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 GRADE Actual Projected Protected Projected Projected Projected Projected KDG 998 1024 1051 1082 1114 1142 1170 1 1015 1057 1084 1116 1149 1177 1205 2 1024 1044 1087 1118 1151 1179 1207 3 1048 1058 1078 1126 1159 1187 1216 4 1044 1092 1102 1128 1176 1205 1233 5 1069 1088 1136 1152 1178 1223 1252 K- 5 6198 6364 6538 6722 6926 7114 7283 6 1096 1095 1114 1168 1185 1208 1252 7 1034 1120 1119 1144 1199 1211 1234 8 1076 1065 1152 1157 1182 1233 1246 6 -8 3206 3280 3385 3469 3566 3652 3732 9 1256 1368 1361 1458 1469 1495 1549 10 1341 1218 1330 1329 1426 1431 1455 11 1350 1275 1151 1267 1265 1355 1358 12 1352 1326 1250 1130 1245 1237 1325 9 - 12 5299 5187 5092 5184 5406 5517 5687 TOTALS 14703 14831 15016 15374 15898 16284 16701 GRADES K-12 Actual Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected K-5 wIK @ 112 5699 5851 6013 6181 6369 6543 6698 6-8 3206 3280 3385 3469 3566 3652 3732 9-12 5299 5187 5092 5184 5406 5517 5687 K-12 w/K @ 1/2 14204 14319 14490 14833 15341 15713 16117 Note The district is currently operating Full Day Kindergarten in nine schools and includes two state funded Full Day Kindergarten at two additional elementary schools 7 � � Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2009 through 2015 Section III Standard of Service Auburn School District No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2009 through 2015 STANDARD OF SERVICE The School Impact Fee Ordinances adopted by King County, the City of Auburn and the City of Kent indicate that each school district must establish a "Standard of Service"in order to ascertain the overall capacity to house Its projected student population The Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage "capacity"guidelines for computing state funding support The fundamental purpose of the SPI guidelines is to provide a vehicle to equitably distribute state matching funds for school construction projects By default these guidelines have been used to benchmark the district's capacity to house its student population The SPI guidelines do not make adequate provision for local district program needs, facility configurations, emerging educational reform, or the dynamics of each student's educational program The Auburn School District Standard of Service addresses those local considerations that require space in excess of the SPI guidelines The effect on the space requirements for both permanent and relocatable facilities is shown below for each grade articulation pattern Conditions that may result in potential space needs are provided for information purposes without accompanying computations OVERVIEW The Auburn School District operates fourteen elementary schools housing 6,198 students in grades K through 5 665 of the 998 Kindergarten students attend 1/2 days throughout the year Grades 1 through 5, plus 333 kindergartners, attend on a full day basis When converted to a full time equivalence the K-5 enrollment is 5,784 Four middle schools house 3,206 students in grades 6 through 8 The District operates three comprehensive senior high schools and one alternative high school housing 5,299 students in grades 9 through 12 The District opened the fourth high school in the fall of 2005 CLASS SIZE The number of pupils per classroom determines the number of classrooms required to house the student population Class sizes are subject to collective bargaining Changes to class size agreements can have significant Impact on available space The current pupil/teacher limit across all elementary programs is an average of 26 5 students per teacher Consistent with this staffing limit, room capacities are set at 26 5 students per room at grades K - 5 At grades 6 - 12 the limit is set at 30 pupils per room The SPI space allocation for each grade articulation level, less the computed reduction for the Auburn School District Standard of Service, determines the District's capacity to house projected pupil populations These reductions are shown below by grade articulation level ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS STRUCTURED LEARNING FOR DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates a structured learning program for students with moderate to severe disabilities at the elementary school level which currently uses ten classrooms to provide for 105 students The housing requirements for this program are provided for in the SPI space guidelines No loss of capacity is expected unless population with disabilities grows at a disproportionate rate compared to total elementary population ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR The Auburn School District operates an adaptive behavior program for students with behavior disabilities at the elementary school level The program uses two classrooms to provide for 20 students The housing requirements for this program exceed the SPI space allocations by two classrooms Loss of Permanent Capacity 2 rooms @ 26 5 each = (53) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26 5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (53) 9 Auburn School District No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2009through 2015 STANDARD OF SERVICE SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program at the elementary level for special education students requiring Instruction to address their specific disabilities Seventeen standard classrooms are required to house this program The housing requirements for this program exceed the SPI space guidelines by ten standard classrooms The loss of capacity Is expected as growth In program Is larger than the total elementary population Loss of Permanent Capacity 10 rooms @ 26 5 each = (265) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26 5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (265) NATIVE AMERICAN RESOURCE ROOM The Auburn School District operates one resource room to support the education of Native American students at the elementary level One standard classroom is fully dedicated to serve these students Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 room @ 26 5 each = (27) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26 5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (27) HEAD START The Auburn School District operates a Head Start program for approximately 120 youngsters in six sections of 112 day in length The program Is housed at three elementary schools and utilizes three standard elementary classrooms and auxiliary office spaces The housing requirements for this program are not provided form the SPI space guidelines Loss of Permanent Capacity 3 rooms @ 26 5 each = (80) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26 5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (80) EARLY CHILDHOOD SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates a pre-school program for young children with disabilities below age five This program Is housed at eight different elementary schools and currently uses eleven standard classrooms The housing requirements for this program are not provided for In the SPI space guidelines Loss of Permanent Capacity 11 rooms @ 26 5 each = (292) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26 5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (292) READING LASS The Auburn School District operates a program for students needing remedlation and additional language arts Instruction These programs utilize non-standard classroom spaces If available In each elementary school Four elementary schools do not have non-standard rooms available, thus they are housed in a standard classroom The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 26 5 each = (106) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26 5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (106) 10 Aubum School District No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2009through 2015 STANDARD OF SERVICE MUSIC ROOMS The district elementary music programs require one acoustically modified classroom at each elementary school for music instruction The housing requirements are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines Loss of Permanent Capacity 14 rooms @ 26 5 each = (371) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26 5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (371) ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at the elementary school level for students learning English as a second language This program requires fourteen standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines Loss of Permanent Capacity 14 rooms @ 26 5 each = (371) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26 5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (371) SECOND GRADE TOSA PROGRAM The Auburn School District provides a TOSA reading specialist program for eight highly impacted elementary schools This pullout model provides direct instruction to students who are not at grade level and do not receive other services This program requires eight standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 rooms @ 26 5 each = (212) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26 5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (212) ELEMENTARY LEARNING SPECIALIST PROGRAM The Auburn School District provides a learning specialist program to increase literacy skills for first and second graders This program model has been created from the 1-728 funds and currently has the specialist going into existing teacher classrooms, as well as pulling out students into designated classrooms The district is utilizing classrooms at all fourteen elementary schools Loss of Permanent Capacity 14 rooms @ 26 5 each = (371) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26 5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (371) FULL DAY KINDERGARTEN The Auburn School District provides Full-Day Kindergarten programs to increase academic skills for kindergarten students This program model has been created from tuition, 1-728 funds and currently has two schools receiving state funding for 2008-09 school year The district is utilizing fourteen classrooms at nine of the fourteen elementary schools Housing requirements exceed the OSPI space guidelines for this program by seven classrooms Loss of Permanent Capacity 7 rooms @ 26 5 each = (186) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26 5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (186) 11 I Auburn School District No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2009through 2015 STANDARD OF SERVICE t MIDDLE SCHOOLS SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program for each grade at the middle school level This is to accommodate special education students needing remedial Instruction to address their specific disabilities Nine classrooms are required at the middle school level to provide for approximately 300 students The housing requirements for this program are not entirely provided for in the SPI space guidelines ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District offers a self-contained program for students with moderate to severe behavior diabilities The program is housed at one of the middle schools and uses one classroom The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space allocations STRUCTURED LEARNING CENTER AND DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates four structured learning classrooms at the middle school level for students with moderate to severe disabilities and one developmentally disabled classroom for students with profound disabilities Two of the four classrooms for this program are provided for in the SPI space allocations Loss of Permanent Capacity 2 rooms @ 26 5 each = (53) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26 5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (53) MIDDLE SCHOOL COMPUTER LABS The Auburn School District operates a minimum of one computer lab at each middle school This program utilizes a standard classroom per middle school The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 30 each = (120) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (120) ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at the middle school level for students learning English as a second language This program requires four standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 30 each = (120) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (120) ROOM UTILIZATION The Auburn School District provides a comprehensive middle school program that includes '1 elective options in special interest areas Facilities to accommodate special interest activities are �1 not amenable to standard classroom usage The district averages 95% utilization of all available teaching stations SPI Report#3 dated 11/14/08 identifies 148 teaching stations available in the mid-level facilities The utilization pattern results in a loss of approximately 8 teaching stations Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 rooms @ 30 each = (240) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 ' Total Capacity Loss (240) 12 Aubum School District No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2009through 2015 STANDARD OF SERVICE i SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS SENIOR HIGH COMPUTER LABS The Auburn School District operates two computer labs at each of the senior high schools This program utilizes two standard classrooms at comprehensive high schools and one at West Auburn The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines Loss of Permanent Capacity 7 rooms @ 30 each = (210) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (210) ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at three comprehensive high schools for students learning English as a second language This program requires three standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines Loss of Permanent Capacity 3 rooms @ 30 each = (90) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (90) STRUCTURED LEARNING CENTER PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates six structured learning center classrooms for 53 students with moderate to severe disabilities This program requires two standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines Loss of Permanent Capacity 2 rooms @ 30 each = (60) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (60) ' TRANSITION PROGRAM FOR 18-21 YEAR OLD The Auburn School District operates a transition program for 18-21 year old students with moderate to severe disabilities Two classrooms are utilized for this program that connects students to the community and work The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines Loss of Permanent Capacity 2 rooms @ 30 each = (60) , Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (60) SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program at the senior high level for special education students requiring instruction to address their specific learning disabilities The current senior high school program requires eleven classrooms to provide for approximately 370 students The SPI space guidelines provide for one of the eleven teaching stations Loss of Permanent Capacity 10 rooms @ 30 each = (300) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (300) ' 13 Aubum School District No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2009through 2015 ' STANDARD OF SERVICE PERFORMING ARTS CENTERS Auburn High School Includes 25,000 square feet used exclusively for a Performing Arts Center The SPI Inventory includes this space when computing unhoused student capacity This space was not intended for nor is it usable for classroom Instruction It was constructed to provide a community center for the performing arts Using SPI capacity guidelines, 25,000 square feet computes to 208 unhoused students or 8 33 classrooms Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 33 rooms @ 30 each = (250) ROOM UTILIZATION ' The Auburn School District provides a comprehensive high school program that includes numerous elective options in special interest areas Facilities to accommodate special interest activities are not amenable to standard classroom usage The district averages 95% utilization of all available teaching stations SPI Report#3 dated 11/14/08 identifies 148 teaching stations available in the senior high facilities The utilization pattern results in a loss of approximately 10 teaching stations Loss of Permanent Capacity 10 rooms @ 30 each = (300) ' Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (300) STANDARD OF SERVICE COMPUTED TOTALS ' ELEMENTARY Loss of Permanent Capacity = (2,332) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (2,332) MIDDLE SCHOOL Loss of Permanent Capacity = (533) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (533) SENIOR HIGH Loss of Permanent Capacity = (1,270) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 ' Total Capacity Loss (1,270) TOTAL Loss of Permanent Capacity = (4,135) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (4,135) 14 t ' Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2009 through 2015 1 Section IV ' Inventory of Facilities 1 1 1 1 Auburn School District No 408 , CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2009through 2015 INVENTORY OF FACILITIES Table IV.1 shows the current inventory of permanent district facilities and their OSPI rated capacities Table IV 2 shows the number and location of each portable unit by school. The district uses relocatable ' facilities to 1. provide interim housing in school attendance areas uniquely impacted by increasing school ' populations that would otherwise require continual redistricting 2 make space available for changing program requirements and offerings determined by unique student needs, and ' 3 provide housing to cover district needs until permanent facilities can be financed and constructed Relocatable facilities are deemed to be interim, stop gap measures that often place undesirable stress on existing , physical plants Core facilities (i e gymnasiums, restrooms, kitchens, labs, lockers, libraries, etc) are not of sufficient size or quantity to handle the increased school population served by adding relocatable classrooms Table Permanent Facilities District School Facilities IV 1 @ OSPI Rated Capacity (November 2008) Building Capacity Acres Address Elementary Schools Washington Elementary 492 540 20 E Street Northeast,Auburn WA,98002 � I, Terminal Park Elementary 401 670 1101 D Street Southeast,Auburn WA,98002 Dick Scobee Elementary 550 1050 1031 14th Street Northeast,Auburn WA, 98002 Pioneer Elementary 415 830 2301 M Street Southeast,Auburn WA,98002 Chinook Elementary 485 875 3502 Auburn Way South,Auburn WA, 98092 Lea Hill Elementary 459 1000 30908 124th Avenue Southeast,Auburn WA,98092 Grldo Rev Elementary 531 1000 1005 37th Street Southeast,Auburn WA, 98002 Evergreen Heights Elem 456 809 5602 South 316th Auburn WA,98001 Al ac Elementary 494 1060 310 Milwaukee Boulevard North,Pacific WA,98047 Lake View Elementary 595 1640 16401 Southeast 318th Street,Auburn WA,98092 ' Hazelwood Elementary 578 1267 11815 Southeast 304th Street, Auburn W A,98092 Ilalko Elementary 585 1200 301 Oravetz Place Southeast,Auburn WA, 98092 Lakeland Hills Elementary 594 1200 1020 Evergreen Way SE,Auburn WA,98092 Arthur Jacobsen Elementary614 1000 29205 132° Street SE, Auburn, WA 98092 ELEM CAPACITY 7249 Middle Schools Cascade Middle School 836 1730 1015 24th Street Northeast, Auburn WA,98002 Olympic Middle School 898 1740 1825 K Street Southeast,Auburn WA,98002 Rainier Middle School 849 2633 30620 1 16th Avenue Southeast,Auburn WA,98092 ' Mt Baker Middle School 845 3088 620 37th Street Southeast, Auburn WA,98002 MS CAPACITY 3,428 Senior High Schools ' West Auburn High School 231 5 10 401 West Main Street, Auburn WA,98001 Auburn Senior High 2,261 1860 800 Fourth Street Northeast,Auburn WA,98002 Auburn Riverside HS 1,388 3300 501 Oravetz Road,Auburn WA,98092 Auburn Mountamview 1-IS 1,431 4000 28900 124"'Ave SE,Auburn, WA 98092 SH CAPACITY 5,311 TOTAL CAPACITY 16,025 , 16 , ' Auburn School District No 408 ' CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2009 through 2015 INVENTORY OF FACILITIES TABLE 7MPORARYIRELOCATABLE IV.2FACILITIES INVENTORY (March 2009) Elementary Location 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 Washington 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Terminal Park 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Dick Scobee 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Pioneer 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Chinook 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Lea Hill 5 5 5 2 2 2 2 Gddo Rey 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 ' Evergreen Heights 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 Alpac 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Lake View 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 ' Hazelwood 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ilalko 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Lakeland Hills Elementary 0 2 2 4 4 4 4 ' Arthur Jacobsen Elementary 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL UNITS 30 32 34 33 33 33 33 TOTAL CAPACITY 795 848 901 875 875 875 875 Middle School Location 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 Cascade 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 Olympic 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 Rainier 5 5 5 8 8 8 8 Mt Baker 6 8 8 8 8 8 8 TOTAL UNITS 11 13 13 18 20 20 20 TOTAL CAPACITY 330 390 390 540 600 600 600 Sr High School Location 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 ' West Auburn 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 Auburn 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Auburn Riverside 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 ' Auburn Mountainview 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL UNITS 25 25 25 26 26 26 26 TOTAL CAPACITY 1 750 1 750 1 750 1 780 1 780 1 780 1 780 ' COMBINED TOTAL UNITS 66 70 72 77 79 79 79 COMBINED TOTAL CAPACITY 1,875 1,988 2,041 2,195 2,255 2,255 2,255 1 ' 17 Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2009 through 2015 ' Section V Pupil Capacity Auburn School District No 408 ' CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2009 through 2015 PUPIL CAPACITY , While the Auburn School District uses the SPI Inventory of permanent facilities as the data from which to determine space needs, the District's educational program requires more space than that ' provided for under the formula This additional square footage is converted to numbers of pupils in Section III, Standard of Service The District's capacity is adjusted to reflect the need for additional space to house its programs Changes in the capacity of the district recognize new unfunded , facilities The combined effect of these adjustments is shown on Line B in Tables V 1 and V 2 below Table V 1 shows the Distict's capacity with relocatable units included and Table V 2 without these units Table V.1 Capacity WITH relocatables 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 A SPI Capacity 15,950 15,950 15,950 15,950 15,950 16,750 16,750 , A 1 SPI Capacity-New Elem 585 1/ A 2 SPI Capacity- New MS 800 B Capacity Adjustments 2,260) (2,147) (2,094) 1,940) 1,880 1,880 1,880) ' C Net Capacity 13,690 13,803 13,856 14,010 14,870 14,870 15,455 D ASD Enrollment 14,703 14,319 14,490 14,833 15,341 15,713 16,117 , 3/ E. ASD Surplus/Deficit (1,013) (516) (634) (823) (471) (843) (662) CAPACITY ADJUSTMENTS i Include Relocatable 1,875 1,988 2,041 2,195 2,255 2,255 2,255 , 2/ Exclude SOS pg 14) (4,135) 4,135 4,135) 4,135 4,135) (4,135) (4,135) Total Adjustments (2,260) (2,147) (2,094) (1,940) (1,880) (1,880) (1,880) Table V.2 ' Capacity ' WITHOUT relocatables 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 A SPI Capacity 15,950 15,950 15,950 15,950 15,950 16,750 16,750 A 1 SPI Capacity-New Elem 585 1/ A 2 SPI Capacity- New MS 800 B Capacity Adjustments (4,135) (4,135 4,135 4,135) 4,135 4,135 4,135) C Net Capacity 11,815 11,815 11,815 11,815 12,615 12,615 13,200 ' D ASD Enrollment 14,703 14,319 14,490 14,833 15,341 15,713 16,117 3/ E. ASD Surplus/Deficit (2,888) (2,504) (2,675) (3,018) (2,726) (3,098) (2,917) ' CAPACITY ADJUSTMENTS ' 2/ Exclude SOS (pg 14) (4,135) (4,135)1 (4,135 4,135 4,135) 4,135) (4,135) Total Adjustments (4,135) (4,135) (4,135) (4,135) (4,135) (4,135) (4,135) 1/ New facilities shown in 2012-13 and 2014-15 are not funded under the current Capital Facilities Plan 2/ The Standard of Service represents 25 38%of SPI capacity When new facilities are added the Standard of Service computations are decreased to 23 35%of SPI capacity , 3/ Students beyond the capacity are accomodated in other spaces (commons, library, theater, shared teaching space) 19 ' Auburn School District No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2009 through 2015 ' PERMANENT FACILITIES PUPIL CAPACITY @ SPI Rated Capacity (March 2009) A Elementary Schools Building 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 ' Washington 492 492 492 492 492 492 492 Terminal Park 401 401 401 401 401 401 401 Dick Scobee 550 550 550 550 550 550 550 Pioneer 415 415 415 415 415 415 415 Chinook 485 485 485 485 485 485 485 Lea Hill 459 459 459 459 459 459 459 Gildo Rey 531 531 531 531 531 531 531 ' Ever Heights 456 456 456 456 456 456 456 Alpac 494 494 494 494 494 494 494 Lake View 595 595 595 595 595 595 595 Hazelwood 578 578 578 578 578 578 578 Ilalko 585 585 585 585 585 585 585 Lakeland Hills 585 585 585 585 585 585 585 Arthur Jacobsen 585 585 585 585 585 585 585 Elementary#15 1 1 1 1 1 1 585 ELEM CAPACITY 1 7,211 1 7,211 1 7,211 1 7,211 1 7,211 1 7,211 1 7,796 B Middle Schools Building 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 Cascade 836 836 836 836 836 836 836 Olympic 898 898 898 898 898 898 898 Rainier 849 849 849 849 849 849 849 Mt Baker 845 845 845 845 845 845 845 Middle School#5 0 0 0 0 800 800 800 MS CAPACITY 1 3,428 1 3,428 1 3,428 1 3,428 1 4,228 4,228 4,228 C Senior High Schools Building 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 West Auburn 231 231 231 231 231 231 231 Auburn 2,261 2,261 2,261 2,261 2,261 2,261 2,261 ' Auburn Riverside 1,388 1,388 1,388 1,388 1,388 1,388 1,388 Auburn Mountainview 1,431 1,431 1,431 1,431 1,431 1,431 1,431 SH CAPACITY 5,311 5,311 5,311 5,311 5,311 5,311 5,311 COMBINED CAPACITY 15,950 15,950 15,950 15,950 16,750 16,750 17,335 i 1 i ' 20 ' Auburn School District No 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2009 through 2015 Section A Capital Construction Plan 1 Aubum School District No 408 ' CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2009 through 2015 ' CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN The formal process used by the Board to address current and future facility needs began in 1974 , with the formation of a community wide citizens committee The result of this committee's work was published in the document titled'Guidelinesfoi Development.' In 1985 the Board formed a second Ad Hoc citizens committee to pick up from the work of the first and address the needs of the District for subsequent years The work of this committee was published in the document titled 'Directions for the Nineties ' In 1995 the Board commissioned a third Ad Hoc citizens committee to make recommendations for improvements to the District's programs and physical facilities. The committee recommendations are published in the document titled 'Education Into The Twenty-First Century- -A Community Involved ' The 1995 Ad Hoc committee recommended the District develop plans for the implementation, ' funding, and deployment of technology throughout the District's programs The 1996 Bond proposition provided funding to enhance the capacity of each facility to accommodate ' technological applications The 1998 Capital Levy provided funding to further deploy technology at a level sufficient to support program requirements in every classroom and department In 2005 a replacement technology levy was approved to continue to support technology across all facets of the District's teaching, learning and operations. In addition to the technology needs of the District the Ad Hoc committee recognized the District ' must prepare for continued student enrollment growth As stated in their report, "the District must pursue an appropriate high school site as soon as possible " The Ad Hoc recommendation included commentary that the financing should be timed to maintain consistent rates of assessment A proposition was approved by the voters on April 28, 1998 that provided $8,000,000 over six years to address some of the technology needs of the District, and $5,000,000 to provide funds to acquire school sites. During the 1997-98 school year a Joint District Citizen's Ad Hoc Committee was appointed by , the Auburn and Diermger School Boards to make recommendations on how best to serve the school population from an area that includes a large development known as Lakeland South. Lakeland South at that time was immediately adjacent to the southern boundary of the Auburn School District. On June 16, 1998 the Ad Hoc Committee presented its recommendation at a joint meeting of the Auburn and Dieringer Boards of Directors. On June 22, 1998 the Auburn School Board adopted Resolution No. 933 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries of the District in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation On June 23, 1998 the Diermger School Board adopted a companion Resolution No 24-97-98 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation These actions resulted in the transfer of an area from Diermger to Auburn containing most of the Lakeland South development and certain other , undeveloped properties Development in this area is progressing at an aggressive rate. In April of 2002, the Board formed a fifth citizen's Ad Hoc committee to address the following two items and make recommendations to the board in the Fall of 2002- a A review of the conclusion and recommendations of 1985 and 1995 Ad Hoc Committees ' related to accommodating high school enrollment growth. This included the review of possible financing plans for new facilities. 22 t ' Auburn School Distnct No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN ' 2009 through 2015 CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN b. Develop recommendations for accommodating high school enrollment growth for the next 10 years if a new senior high school is not built This committee recommended the board place the high school on the ballot for the fifth time in February 2003 The February election approved the new high school at 68 71% yes votes. The school opened in the Fall of 2005 In the Fall of 2003 the school board directed the administration to begin the planning and design for Elementary#13 and Elementary #14. in the Fall of 2004, the Auburn School Board passed ' Resolution No. 1054 to place two elementary schools on the ballot in February 2005. The voters approved the ballot measure in February of 2005 at 64 72%. Lakeland Hills Elementary (Elementary#13) opened in the Fall of 2006 Arthur Jacobsen Elementary (Elementary #14) is located in the Lea Hill area on a 10 acre site and opened in the Fall of 2007. These two elementary schools were built to accommodate the housing growth in Lakeland Hills and Lea Hill areas of the school district. ' In the 2004-05 school year, the Board convened a sixth Citizen's Ad Hoc committee to again study and make recommendations about the future impacts in the District One of the areas of study was the need for New Facilities and Modernization The committee made a number of recommendations including school size, the need for a new middle school, and to begin a capital improvements program to modernize or replace facilities based upon criterion. During the 2005-06 school year, a Joint District Citizen's Ad Hoc Committee was appointed by the Auburn and Kent School Boards to make recommendations on how best to serve the school population that will come from an area that includes a number of projected developments in the north Auburn valley On May 17, 2006 the Ad Hoc Committee presented its recommendation at a joint meeting of the Auburn and Kent Boards of Directors On June 14, 2006 the Kent School Board adopted Resolution No. 1225 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries of the District in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation On June 26, 2006 the Auburn School Board adopted a companion Resolution No. 1073 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. These actions resulted in the transfer of an area from the Kent School District to the Auburn School District effective September 29, 2006. In October of 2008, after two years of review and study, a Steering Committee made ' recommendations to the school board regarding the capital improvements program to modernize or replace facilities as recommended by the 2004-05 Citizen's Ad Hoc Committee These recommendations, based on specific criteria, led to the school board placing a school improvement bond and capital improvements levy on the ballot in March 2009 Voters did not approve either measure that would have updated 24 facilities and replaced three aging schools This review also identified the need for a Special Education Transition Facility for students with disabilities that are 18 to 21 years old. This facility is planned to be operational by the Fall of 2009 to address this growth need. The District is projecting 1998 additional students within the six year period including the Lakeland, Lea Hill, and north Auburn valley areas This increase in student population will ' 23 Auburn School District No 408 , CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2009 through 2015 CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN require the acquisition of new middle school and new elementary school sites and construction of ' a middle school and elementary school during the six year window Based upon the District's capacity data and enrollment projections, as well as the student generation data included in Appendix A.3, the District has determined that approximately eighty- six percent of the capacity improvements are necessary to serve the students generated from new development, with the remaining additional capacity required to address existing need. The table below illustrates the current capital construction plan for the next six years The exact timelines are wholly dependent on the rate of growth in the school age population and passage of ' bond issues and/or capital Improvement levies. 2009-15 Capital Construction Plan March 2009 Projected Fund Project Timelmes Project Funded Cost Source 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-13 13-14 14-15 All Facilities- 2006 Technology Yes $12,000,000 6 Year XX XX XX XX Modernization Cap Levy Portables Yes $1,200,000 Impact Fees XX XX XX XX XX XX X Property Purchase Impact New Middle School Yes $9,000,000 Fees XX New Elementary Yes $3,500,000 State Mat XX XX XX Speual Education Yes $750.000 Impact Fees XX XX Transition Facility Bond XX XX XX XX 1/ Middle School#5 No $42,500,000 Impact Fee plan const const open Bond XX XX XX 1l Elementary 415 No $21,750,000 Impact Fee plan const ope Multiple Facility No $46,400,000 Capital Levy XX XX XX XX XX XX 11 improvements Replacement of No $239.000,000 Bond Issue XX XX XX XX XX X 1/ three aging schools 1/ These funds may be secured through local bond issues,sale of real property,impact fees,and state matching funds , The District currently is not eligible for state assistance at the elementary school level for new construction The district is eligible for state matching funds for modernization 24 ' Auburn School District No 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2009 through 2015 Section VII Impact Fees i 1 1 1 t 1 t 1 1 1 T T M M T T a ! I O W O @ p o ^ ry 0 0 �' E �+J 0 0 0 0 0 0 LL O I� O O LL O h O LL O N N Nh m O O m O N N m M 4N') m N f�q LL OO p CO 0 LL �O CO N LL CO N O 0 LL (D n U o m o M U m �! °° o o U 0 a O O U �' o to � d-T �pl" (.9 U Eli (n Vi Z9 CA tH T T E T E o 0 0 E o 0 o E o 0 o E o 0 0 m rn v N m m rn It N m rn 't N m rn v N LL r M 7 �p LL r M LL f� M 7 LL M d' 0 0 m m LL , 0 D LL- LL c 0 c c 0 o D o 0 Z c E o 0 0 0o c E o 0 0 o c E o 0 0 c E o 0 0 O m O N aD LL m m O N O LL O m O N O m m O N OJ 1 o f U m oNi U 0 C7 d (7 m M u� U U` L M a a m o 0 o c o N N n u m n NL J 3 ~ ~ LPL O , O .T. O LL LL O LL J t0 p U W U o W CO Q m rn m m r o a e N Q L - U O O U m Lo 00 O U U COO COD (OD U@ n U O O .�- u LL rn m n o 2 c E rn rn rn 2 E o 0 0 m U J o a LL U W m a o 0 0 o W a o 0 0 0 0 O u0� vOi c N c O E O E H .n' LL LLyj ji W H in x ¢ Q O c C C x CLi m () N y 2 a o co -0 x m o CO LL m o 0 o h li m m o 0 -3N ° Q U N n O G N N N OM U jl 00 m o M 0. a (n U N Z a LL Z a LL W 0 LL ' `. `m O O U Z x m V x V x W m ' OO O L LL = N = N_ cn O L N U O O U W LL Ili y a n W Q o> 2 a s rn m m axi n O T O Z N N V U m U O CO O U m U O N N O 0 a M O O a Cp T W n U 0 LL m U �n LL m U N N a x 0 c cD o cD LL N �' ' LL �' x m to - - Q a L c uj 0 o o W D 0 W U U U Vm 3 N Q Q r U y W y xt W LL u o o u a Q �D Z v E CO E °?to LL m m mm L m L m L Q m 0 U 0 Y o� ti Q a a E W E E a = C E c E U x g E E E U x ¢ E E U = a a 0 ~ O m a W o CO °� _0 W ° U 0 a ~ 0 m a 2 m w hLL warn aLL w � U) i- LL w 2 (n yLL uj � n ► c c i � E o m � ' x 1 0 x .. .- T rn ULLM O O x � O � C � z O y T O �co N O (O OM pCO of E mo o 3 E � r� u> co } LL Vt to ER tR EA tq O N Z W N W ` W L LL J 0 x H � V 0 � �' � � � Q to N L LL N m U O O O O (n to _ `� m Q LL D x a' a LU Q D 3 W 2 r> rnN �rno 00N U m d u� a o N cn a n o c m � m cro coo cN'� C CO O T c'? O fA O of 7 ej m co (D 3 mEe» o w `o m 0 x to 1 O O O � LL � v W z > V u E m U E o z' LLI N N T O J .. J 6 r N N Z n 3tr > N � LL O O O OU N 'O co N O O U y 00 O Q > m a Q � V3 � O O C o U) U U ^ a 0 ° m >' m E >' > m m V ° _O x c m E ly > E d LL LL L Lu LL a '-' LL wU � c � � 0 0 °' O E a m W LL U t0 a �j z >. cl > E E o U W o � U l m aEi �° m w w m 1� LL H O LL (n LL H U) F-- LL LL LL 2 N O O N y o o o o M o U CN 0 = r O l00 t� N e O M M 00 M D M D0 aM0 n N 0 N j tD Pco (AlS CL J O 0 n O O ° , Q M Cl) p 0 0 N 7 o 0) n M N f� o ❑ N O O u) M N N CDN O1 ro O) O TO D LO O m N O O N N � N U N J N O EH U3 N Q O ^ , E M 00 0 Nin - 7 0 o n ° ° N f� o U1 L W Y p N N M N O M 0 Cn O O °i U) Q U) N ER 'O 6 0 � O N O LO r o o C N CO p 0 CJ N a c o a f- h o Q CU LL o co M W M OM M 00 OMO �O C 00 U) M O N N r r O M O N 7 M ER U N r m N @ O C a O r O Z to LO< L O O N nJ M o ° N o o N ❑ M M (oN Q LLL co U) p O co L O L e oo 0] r M N O J O O Cl) N N O M a0 6) OM O N M O M 0 0 M , e a W O O COW n N N ^ T M O M 7 UY a ° M N N O �} En (fl Q M EA fR Z (/l 64 _U W N J ❑ a O N r O N n a r U 0O ° O N N M o o M \ N OO Q :5 E C p 0 tf1 OD N O N 'It m O n (`� N m L Q O N 'L 0, N M D l0 O N ( N co m p M 0 W ` J pO W Y p I� N N� N T M M 7 Elf 7 ILU 7 � a a Q M i C Cn C 0 N m l04 @ w O O N li U p U a O p 0 LL LL M N 3 C Q O-co L a N j Q Z �' °� 3 @HH E x LU N .Nn @� h E �' Mo W O d LL U p W L O N N O O y N O J co c W ° 0 m O a N N E > > ` m 0 0 y@ - O C M O .° N N m @ a @ N @ @ O 0 O @ N d W ry U -O w o LOL IL _9 m a m m m ' Q m w U @ c @ m c ° '° > o ° o U) n @ m@ a o M L ❑ 3 _ CJ ° N y E U) cn O U T >, U 0J u �° u) u Y @ w ° 'k � a @ aaa m a m d m m p a> a r —0 Cc o U) Un (n n U c c N Q M e m ❑ E v ❑ -° o ❑ [Y oa E E E E E E E M E m = c Un -O N `� m Un m d 0 w o o ° ° c E 3 3 C rn Q w 2 Q (7 ¢ U) <n 5 U) a H Ui LL �i U Y U U m m N m o m c '° m O r N U 3 @Ua3 a3• U U° M i i vi um7 ❑ Q HYx a—' 0L. ao QocQ -Jc Jo a m m B — ° b mti o ° om U ` Fo LL I c o m 0 C Uad n n a Q m Om Em E Ln a EL ' v razz UnUn a U) m2i2 o ❑ c� Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2009 through 2015 Section VIII ' Appendix Appendix A.1 - Student Enrollment Projections tAppendix A.2 - CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Enrollment Protections Appendix A 3 - Student Generation Survey k Appendix A.1 - Student Enrollment Projections 1 1 1 i t t 1 1 Auburn School District #408 Student Enrollment Projections October 2008 Introduction The projective techniques give some consideration to historical and current data as a basis for forecasting the future In addition, the `projector' must make certain assumptions about the operant variables within the data being used These assumptions are "judgmental"by definition Forecasting can be defined as the extrapolation or logical extension from history to the future, or from the known to the unknown The attached tabular data reviews the history of student enrollment, sets out some quantitative assumptions, and provides projections based on these numerical factors The projection logic does not attempt to weigh the individual sociological, psychological, economic, and political factors that arc present in any demographic analysis and projection The logic embraces ' the assumptions that whatever these individual factors have been in the past are present today, and will be in the future It further moderates the impact of singular factors by averaging data over thirteen years and six years respectively The results provide a trend, which reflects along(13-year) and a short (6-year)base from which to extrapolate. Two methods of estimating the number of kindergarten students have been used The first uses the average increase or decrease over the past 13 and 6-year time frame and adds it to each succeeding , year The second derives what the average percentage Auburn kindergartners have been of the live births in King County for the past 5 years and uses this to project the subsequent four years The degree to which the actuals deviate from the projections can only be measured after the fact This deviation provides a point of departure to evaluate the effectiveness of the assumptions and logic being used to calculate future projections Monitoring deviation is critical to the viability and credibility of the projections derived by these techniques Tables Table I — Thirteen Year Historyy of October 1 Enrollments—page 3 The data shown in this table is the baseline information used to project future enrollment This data shows the past record of enrollment in the district on October 1 of each year. Table 2—Historical Factors Used in Protections -page 4 This table shows the three basic factors derived from the data in Table 1. These factors have been used in the subsequent projections The three factors are 1. Factor 1—Average Pupil Change Between Grade Levels This factor is sometimes referred to as the"holding power"or"cohort survival" It is a measure of the number of pupils gained or lost as they move from one grade level to the next 2. Factor 2 - Average Pupil Change by Grade Level This factor is the average change at each grade level over the 13 or 6-year period , 3. Factor 3 —Auburn School District Kindergarten Enrollment as a Function of King County Live Births. This factor calculates what percent each kindergarten class was of the King County live , births in the 5 previous years From this information has been extrapolated the kindergarten pupils expected for the next 4 years 1 ' Table 3—Prorectzon Models—pages 5-13 This set of tables utilizes the above mentioned variables and generates several projections The 1 models are explained briefly below ❑ Table 3 13 (pg 5)—shows a projection based on the 13-year average gam in kindergarten I (Factor 2) and the 13-year average change between grade levels (Factor 1) The data is shown for the district as a whole ❑ Table 3 6 (pg 5)—shows a projection using the same scheme as Table 3 13 except it shortens the historical to only the most recent 6 years. ❑ Table 3 13A and 3 6A (pg 6)—uses the same factors above except Factor 3 is substituted for Factor 2 The kindergarten rates are derived from the King County live births instead of the average gam. ❑ Tables 3E 13, 3E 6, 3E 13A, 3E 6A (pg 7)—breaks out the K-5 grades from the district projection Summary level data is provided for percentage gam and pupil gam by grade articulation ❑ Tables 3MS.13, 3MS.6,3MS.13A, 3MS 6A (pg 8)—breaks out the 6-8 grades from the district projection Summary level data is provided for percentage gain and pupil gain by grade articulation ❑ Tables 3SH.13, 3SH.6, 3SH 13A, 3SH 6A (pg 9)—breaks out the 9-12 grades from the district projection Summary level data is provided for percentage gam and pupil gain by grade articulation. ❑ Table 4 (pg 10)—Collects the four projection models by grade group for ease of comparison. ❑ Table 5 (pgs l 1-13)—shows how well each projection model performed when compared with actual enrollments Data is provided in both number and percent formats for the past 13 years i Summary Historically, average gain in students over the past 6 years is 1 53%annually that equates to 213 students Over the past 13 years the average gam is 1 41% and equates to 189 students annually Using the cohort survival models that data below is a summary of the range of variation between the four models This data can be used for planning for future needs of the district The models show changes in the next six years. • Elementary level shows increase ranging from 286 to 581. (page 7) ■ Middle School level shows increase ranging from 170 to 256 (page 8) ■ High School level shows decreases ranging from-38 to -112 (page 9) The models show these changes looking forward thirteen years: ■ Elementary level shows increase ranging from 490 to 1220 (page 7) r ■ Middle School level shows increase ranging from 300 to 599 (page 8) ■ High School level shows increase ranging from 106 to 374 (page 9) This data does not factor new developments that are currently under construction or in the planning ' stages 2 s A rn l0 N V rn O 1 0 O O N '� o o N V I� O (0 CO O 7 0 m N V a M m M I� t0 V t0 u� O O 't M •M- 0) M rn O N O 0) O O rn 7 U Op rn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N M M M a rn �O N 00j O N O N N N M N O M O B M N M M N M N d' c cc l0 0) n r M f` t` M h N M a) IDo O N rn r (O M r O r O M p 00 ' 0 O O rn r O t0 M M O V] O O V a "' M rn 0) N N co O rn rn O 0 0 0 M M M N O r rn O m M M m M rn 0 0 N r r r 0 r r r r r L r m n N_ N rn (D -1 N N O N r M a _ l0 M tO N 0 V co O rn O O O M V N (O f� r O N d' OM 7 m 0 0 0 0 0 7 N 00 V co rn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 co 7 M (.) rn N O n M O (p M N M (O M 0 O r N y t (D N � T V) O N tO V W f` rn M N N M o N CO 00 N N t0 rn M 7 N M Z O tO M M O rn O O N M t- w O N 0 7 O T O W rn N M M O M 7 M (O rn 0) rn rn O O O r 0 ! r O Q O V (0 N rn O M O rn 0) rn (O O M O O r r r M t6 It Ln M N M t0 M 0 r m U ca o N o O C e a' N t0 O M co V V t0 Cl) N p N O N W M I� N N OM (O CO (O I� N O O O N V M t0 r V (O r (O (D O o m rn m (T p rn p r .r-- N O m (Mr) O m U` 7 00 N (D N a m cN�) N M 7 CD N r r r r r m a r a v o a Z p N N rn t0 r O r M I� 7 O N O N t0 m tT N M n O O t0 (MD m co LLO'1 m (0 W h m O m m m O r r O � N O m O N N co r 00 O O O N 0 O C O r r r .- r r r r N Q Q N (O (D N a (O M N M M J ` N (D t0 [0 O n 00 t0 0 p i0 0 O M (NO O N N a 0 f� M N � � M 7 O t0 t0 Q � O M B t0 7 M M 0) O O O 7 N M 7 M O O T O00 Z N O O m O O � � O O a � m O M N � N r T � rn N � t00 N 7 m M N M a N O O W M r _O Z N n M 00 n V N M O O o (0 O C c0 CO A N co co (O rn r N OD Cl) p [D [D rn co CO (D co rn It N N rn rn co O V O 1� O NA!, ,i M N C (O 0 rn m of 0 0 O O V' 7 0 WQ O co O O O O O N (.� (� a0 N (I) (D N �+) O M N M d' M p N O) o tl r _ o OOrnm (D 00 �` CO @ r W O T T O) mNO 0 O 0 0 N 0 O N N r M M p Q Q N O (O a N (O N N tD o C fr co h N r (D O M (O M 0 O` O R (O m ^ O M M m O O C 0 m m W O O m m rn N O C co rn O O O O O O O M M W r U M N N (D M V) M N r M Q M OW D o C7 n 0 r o a O N o w 0) N t- O) M t0 O co - t0 rn V 0 m i0 M rn 7 N N rn rn m O (` t0 M tT tT h M 0) N N ItO 0) 4') 00(0 O N O r W M (O r r 0 M M r (� @ 0 w00 I� O O m co O O N O U 0 m W rn rn rn rn rn O r r O N r 0 0 C co Q Q O O @ r rno � oM (Dn (morn � oM Nrn m y m co co (i) W co co 7 M r N N r t- N O r 0 0) c0 O O) m 00 M O O 0000 _ 0 0 rn (P rn rn (T tr r 0 0 O Q f0 0. N O CU rn t0 c0 (D N rn Cl) 7 M N rn (p m m (D r 0 (�') 7 M O m O a 0 0)0 M T t0 M (fl rn CD 7 O O O rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn W 9 N C rn rn r r N W m r (D rn M N (6 N (O (D N � (O N N M N H rn r ( C U a)W J O (� w Q (D a) t0 tD cM (O CD co co 0) N N co r Q r N Cl) V l0 t0 1- OD CA N a — 0] Q CL r 3 Q r Y Y Y cD r r` Y o O F a N L 0. i Go Om 1 ZLL O N � F = N d M a o J " > q q Q 7 o a o o = O) O) m N r N m (D f0 N 7 O m m m (0 w m O M 01 M M M r 00 a w w h 7 N r 20 Q J (O w M 0) N N N t r w N m m O w O w m Cl) O N w w 7 r r m w Z Z Q7 v N v N w a w r w N M m M N N M m w 61 m 0) w r r ^ O > > 7 > O W Y LLJ w M a V V v 7 I a 7 7 a C <7 7 d' •t 7 M M M V M M M M V 7 d' �' 7 V a Q g q q O y U) H Z J 00 O � � m , 0 O )^ c z Z a d a a a o W a S J S S z• c m Z LLI ^ E W e NQ r O) O CO M (D N 0) N m n N O N M N N m r N 7 r O N M N 7 M a oo Op U W N N Co Y a' m N m (D r r w r m w m m m m m m O m m m m w 0) m m m 6 m rn m Of N 0 ~ >- w O q Z Q (A O O W 0 m m m -t r N w m m 0 m r O M N V N w w M M O M � N M N r 70 N m Cn M M d' O 0 W = N M r N m r N 't 0 0 7 N N — M N N w w � r r N N N r N M -Q N V N w Q (n Z W U J > (D N V N w M m O r O N w w m m w m O M .- M N O n m O O M O m N r r r w M C 0 .J Q� 'i M M M M 7 a w w r w w w O) m O w V O N 7 N N N N N N N N M V 05 O Q — N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N H Z Z q m ^ ^ ^ .- r ^ ^ .-- ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ o) V Y Y J L w ULL M J w M O N M N m r w O O N M N m r m M 0 N M 7 N m r m O O T N n V y O g LL O r r w 00 m w w w m m w m m m m 0) m m m m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q Z W O f� m O N M 7 Cfl f� O) O N M 7 (O 1� W O N M 7 u1 CD I� wm O N (`� w N p y W n r r w m m w m w m w w w m m m rn 0) m 0) rn m rn d p U y J � O M M m M r N m 0 0 0 m N M O �_ N m O r M M N , N v m m M m r N 0 00 Z O LL (h F' V N C 7 N N w O M m N M N m m O N M m a Cam') M N 7 M V N N <Y CNO N O OM w = O m m (ri a s a v v v ui ui (ri (n m co co co ro r- w oo co n r ao r- n r r n n n t� 06 C6 i J A q ca J Z r 7 m 0 0 N m N N M M 01 M r m O N m O m R O) O M M Q y = N m m )D r v m m O 0 7 (O It O O N N M W r w CO n m M O r W n M V N m 0 �t M a) ON 0 0 N <r N M m M N O O w M m m m M 7 m CO m In w O N - - w m rf Z N O W m m O) Oi m w V V a 7 7 't V w L cD w LLJ cc Z Q W M M O a Os}} CO O m NCO CO N O O M N t0 O M 7 M COO M N O ti � N 0 rW CMO M n a00 V O N w F- > F- V' r sr a r m O w m r- m N m r 0) w O N r r O M O O m w N 0 7 h w V m w N 0 ` Q O J x CO C6 co M Ch C7 v (n w m n ro 00 cd m O) N N (O N O <V N N N N N N N N V V 7 m .- - - — - - — — — — r — — .- - - N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Cp N r F.- w m m I m m 7 N M V N m r 7 m m O I N M LO m r w 0) O N M CO r m O N M l0 m r F 0 J < Q r r r r r r w w m m w w w m m m m m m m m m m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o M Q Q V W w w O O M - - O ^ s — —O) M O m O) O O> O m m m m O) 0> Q) m m Q) m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 lL r — — — — .- � W H J 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m w N N m w a w N of O C O a y N m 0 0 -It N C �^ N M M ^ r tC w O > Ql N - w O) N l U) m W N ` '"� y > W ^ y Z 0 Cl) ° � J 0 cr C m mu N ff m 0 1= C w ^ N M V' N m I- w O O y0 0 V a LL y T Q Y N M IT N m r m 0 'O 0 0 0 y X m } 0I a L O O L C C O a) o O O > ` U y - O) N d O) N 7 r m m O N h N N u: 1+ c^ o O m �" N N O Cl) N r O co N N m 00 0 y 0) m 0 0 C) V m N e{ r r w 0 C`,) 'O O O) 7 N m O) m O M N 7 0 M 0 w > � N N 'IT Itm N w w O m .- w N , L0 LL > J U) M .. N L C O Q U) r O m N F O � m N N o ...! N O m N 00 .- W r0 w Y .- N M v N m r w M O r N N X ' Q ll } O N M V N m n w O) O O O > a W } O w CD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V LL U E M O r (0 O L.. LL CD YrNMv (nwrm'rn � ti E 0 a 0 Q N fn N (O W O O M 7 O N M N M M N n (O M (D (D a p CO W aN- N .- " M co Q) M r r 0 Q M N � N (L N o Lo r _ r _ i m o o 0 m o n v m m w o co w c O N O n M o d' a M �D 00 coN O O N M 00 O O N . (D (O n n M O n O n O N (p O) O O N 7 M M M O M M co n n V C[ p) O O O r r n a O r .r- .N-- .M- N O N (OV O 11 O ^ D> n M n v n 00 O N M (D w o O O M m N m CD R O V tD U) O C o Z O ^ N n wO N M a wn n rn CD n M M O tO N O O O N N N N N O tD N co O N N W O D c0 O W 0 n a O ^ o M M 1 n O n a O fl D7 O n n 00 o O O ^ N n m O r m '7 Lo tD (D to O W N (D O M (O O) O O O n m rn (O p M ^ d' I� O O O r r ` (fi 00 d' r .N- r N O M N d p tL IL O N In n 'D o O n O N N N m m V O V W n 00 (O o Z Q ^ N n W m r M 7 tD N In M (fJ co Q ^ N (IJ u] cD n m O O O) Cl) n O) N p a) W (D O O O O r r .- .^- N (O n S (O r r r .N- N (V N C a O a OJ o] O Co /O N CO m N aD n wN M O n n Ol r N M N N N �t CD W Z '� r m n cn M Q) (n m y cD M 00 (D a o cD O m N M v m m v rNi v v�i m O N W Q O O O O O N M N M M 7 n r r r r r r r r N N !L ^� N O (L M Q M O (D N O N O OD W O a0 (`� o rn <O M O M 0 0 to (D m M O o F O ^ CD n M O N O M O M U7 D701 0 O 0 0 M (O M M (O M M N N a � o F cM Mn o O M O O n M 7 n (D fD V N M n p O (D n 00 O W O r 0 (O D.) N O N m O N MN 00 [D r Ja ^ r r r r a r r rrr r r O N n O n T M N M N to co m w n 0 (O M N 0 N (O N o Q O tD OD 00 (O 0] O m r N n Oco Q v n n M M r N O r O n W ppp N U o 0 0 0 0 0 o r v N N o v o 0 0 0 o r r a r o d, ro a r r p CL Z r r o a> LO D) M M r N M 0 CO N O m N O 00 N 7 � o (n O '- O N (p Q (D c0 n O N eT O O� CD O O ^ N (D t0 (O n r O O N N N ` N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ! r M O M "F' fn a 0 0 0 C) 0 0 ^ O O r r a O o O O ^ O r U S O - S O M (D M fD O (D M n M N N M W M CO v M M N n n O (fJ _ W _ O O O O O O O O O O O O M N M 0 N - d } M Z F- C J C C U C J C C U o Q o _ M N (0 O (O 7 [O O O 7 ID CD O N p U' C.I W' 'O O N V 7 co o) M n N � 0Mj N 7 (D O M n N 7 (n n n N M M M � p n � � U O � O O O O O O O O N M M M � � _ r r r r r r r r r .- r r r ^ �- r r r ^ a m ¢ r m L U uJ N W W J p_ a J Q o r Q a m o Q p r N M Q 00 n m rn r a p] Q Q r N M In O n 00 D7 r F. H M O Q f t 0 p N r r N p N a N L0 O N M N ap O O N � a M N { N CL d N a N �00 O N CO)M M ror M O N to O N 0) 1 .M- N N a N a N m O N 7 M 00 CO N (O N (O O O N N O O r O r O N V N �0 O M W CO V K m ofm V 7 N 0 a a r N N N M CO O 7 V O �0 cO N O Z 0 O o0 u] O Qf tO r O a a H 1W 3 O rn fl T O N rn m r m a m O 2 r N CL r 7r .N- N � a a - a IL M M N U) M N U> r r CO co O O l7 O r w l0 Z O O w r iI1 (O m M r O N W K co r N J 0 O O N aD N N w r co N M M 0 r <0 m 0 M O N N w c0 `- M O N N N N O w a Z -� M O w O t O M O M In R a a l0 M C' -e N N u] N W O M r 00 O M N M M 7 r O M O M w 7 M It M M IL a N O M M O 0) N m N O 5 m 0 N 0 'a O N N M O M M t0 M M 01 00 H O rn r m n f M co 0 O 0) r o - M M U o 0 0 -It � o 0 � a a M N O O M a r t0 O 0 7 N M r M 0 r N �0 0 c0 Of v r o rn w L0 O M c0 N mtO O O m � 0 l0 W N � M O N O M c0 r M r — — — —10 � c0 � m � J a N 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 M O N 0- N 0 0 0 O r M M m 0 p N r O O Q 10 N M N t0 1 N i0 p M N r N OI t0 r 0 t0 M N �0 M u� M (� Z.O r 0 a' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 N N 0 in CO 2. a' 0 0 0 0 0 { V N N O - h 0 LO Z = M a O M (D r m �0 O M 0 �0 0 M - N � � M l0 O N O * CO O) N N 7 � M 1 } O M D a CO m r O N 7 0 O co m M O * M ( � r M W N N m N 0 (p M O O O O O O O O M M O �.f (n } Q Z .- 0. .- .- .- .- r .- r O Z c a - O 45 O oC W @ p M 0It n Cl) M N r r 1 0 0 � o W m 0 � � (D M M O tD M r M N N M �.Mj � - O o �n 0 N a cD (0m IT r m �n m v a O o v M a m r m o �n v> o <n o o _ y a O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O M ! N N O _ 0 = a O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O M N N M V ' O m J C Cl-IL m J C C a cO `) N 'T v m rn M m 0 v oM v o 0 0 � o � 52 ro - N a v W M N � � v � � o (7 c7 N U o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N M M M p _ N U co O O O O O O O O N M M M _ U a U a W LU J M Q J �. w Q 0 J d N 07 Q Y .- N M 'T l0 W r m O F m O Q p N M v 0 wr N mN - X O Q M Y O o HCDH co 0 a 1 9 c6 O T O T N O T > co T T N � N a NmO OcOc Mrr o N m O N O r oe m EL _ N_N a GCC0NJJ�iOpNUHpJ0oUNpma Z }N=mo�B a�aMaaO��O�aO�a'pN ONmm�_^r�mr�CMMrNrrrrorroor O r rOroraoor OrNO OIbo�o�1mrO�uomuor0r)MD��OrOh Omm�oNI0O�moacor0rmo rrf7rO mc�moMmOriOomom�vorv0r ar,"rrrru-:rrrTOr'r�"rrmg)^a0rn0r N rOfMr�mrNr7cormrmm0OMr�mNNCM(�OmNo�N(��ODI�7m�Om�lNa D 1 NO�NOfNO��No�gNomm°ooe°aoO°° r rm�rmrr��im-�n (~J N�aaNmrc,r7MNoo r M'OO-0'rmrMr(rnrN�OO�r0r mrOrr1rurrnr�VrOrr�0r-Nrrrrrmrm�rrrmrr TrVre~Tr�ro.mr-m-rr' CNrrNmoOaOOOaOaO-�NO rmmrrocmr`nMMN��r O mm rN 7 m Nn N CO O r N NNN aN Na ° O M 0 C0a� �M�OaOKaKKaCMO7a.aa. N - ce 0 0 - - M N N � NON mUa r m a n Na m a Z rmmmo N O t n O l!J CO N OM a a d NLONT 0 WX� o - CoC - ' 0, a a vN m oMMva m �nr -� Z a WZW N m� m NN M Ita a ° O m ° rmmrr�r�mrr7rMrNo�r� ONomorOmv pNOon0r�Or mer�Nnr0nmo0raor mm�vro�M O Oo O rr am m 0M It or r m nmIn o m m O N 00 0 m CO r 0m�o0rmf- NNOmrmMmOmr m m N W m 7 co m w NM7ma my O � mm o o M m Na o coo - r- z M1nm m+ m N OrrcrO ° o�Orn�N Oo � a0m O } K0 04 tar L0 U) N 5 z m � O = moomMmo Z 60 O m nN7a m r m m am m x OUam r "m LO W j WN Irco��On°° ormmom�mp m o m v> c0 m � o m mama m m `0 mx v oQ m �n It co m m ame m m `0 m oQ om ,nvma rn mt6 C7 a -o Nva m m C7a Naa co m (7a -a7 � mrNaa ~ o 0 0 0 0 0 o - 'n ~ o 0 0 0 0 o m o - m N U o m o 0 0 0 o m o a cn a o rn o 0 0 0 o m c Y CO Q rrrr Y m rrrr a� dYm ¢ Na Y [0 r � ` r U Fla W M W O d W W O o W rai O O a W Q O O�a y m w Q rNMa N �a m W Q rNMd' m `- Q YrNM7 In Q w Q M � , fQ- M IC Y Q M Y H M U' Y Y a 0 N lE N N M`p O p T Or T N T r0 >. O O N O O N uri w0 i0 O N cOD O c0 O N O N a N M O a N M a N a N 'a0 Cl 0 O a o O r ry m O N u) N O M cp O N M O N coo N a " , = N M N a CC O N a N a 0 N L l d r O N in O M M d' c0 O N N O�'i O N V a V N m a' Q� N N r N a a m N N a a O r M O a s Z O - v co I� W i0 O N ON N cmo Co cp O - O w M i0 O M O W .r- 0 0 d me- r NO m a pp N N cMo N a W N - -- M a' m N N m7 0p F- a r N a M N W Ov°Ji coo r� O o 0 o N m O cv'o cmn �n O O 4 r : M NO M 00 N a n = m (r a o a N a ZM N 1n m M o f 0 7 r o O M Co U� c0 0 0 0 0 7 a o O v Mn co r M O m m m r a O N M m N O Mn co m o m r C J O J O O m N O m M c0 e O cDM 00 w to N It N M O r r co o� O N N N O l() O v r cp N N Z a M 7 LLB a a M p a M O (0 F a Z co V (O co o O LO M V 7 N o co V co c0 a M 7 a N o W O M Nr ro O co -q 0co om O M Nr r O co 0 a M a' M O cO] a' 7 V p M D a a M a •- M ? m o M co a o M m N O o M a ch O O M coo O M M N r M m .- M O M O in N r M V a M O N a M M N a •\� p .- M O N a f�J 7 N � H N ? rco o � � yr o e° '� � _ r o o m o 0 M a' N O T 7 M a cV .N- M N y N O M V M O c�V M c0 M O a O a M a e- •- M p d N r N V O S N V � N MNa o O M V af O �_a n N p a N- O ZR' ZO Z Z = Z y m 0 O � � m � o Nm O O � rnrn mo rm N o `m ov cDo 0 uJ � d Q O O m O � a 0 0 0 M 0 t0 W M C1 O O o N m 00 N W 1- a O o O N M O cro Q O O N M o — M N y � o Of O � a = m Lo a a U O O O OMO V I M J O O M M M o -� cp p M r N a J c6 O M M M o T } a o o o 0 } a o 0 0 0 'n cr, 00 a o o o m " 0 rn o 0 o M M r U M U = r 2 C a o r C J C C C J C C W O Q m co R co co 19 W O Q m N c6 W O m f0 (0 W O J m c0 f0 J a m M r O O O J a m Cam") ID O O O' J a p co (o (D J Q c0 R co co � Hm o0 oN wF- moo oN pa mM ro � C9 a � 2mM ro � C7 m Q o M o a a o M o a p U o 0 0 0 M o a U mo 0 0 0 ) o Q UJ M W F in a m U a m 4 U a m a U a p O d w o p a w n W 0 m W Q W F_ m Q � for w mQ � < � r m � Q � mr m � a mtn QcDr m � 0- co x o ~ o ro 0 a T V N M M N cO o O N M (ND (MD r W O N M N nN 0 7 o O O N 7 7 N W ON1 I� p O N a V N a N N 0 dN r (0 0 [1 N ^ N d N ^ m aco N r o r r N \ p CO N (D (D O M N R N M o p ((� m N O (� m f� N 1� m N O N m O N m N m p Gp M M N M ^N CY �O M N aM0 (n0 a O a M N N (O a N 7 7 M N 0 N N a cV r r r r (0 p a N r r r r r r r r r r r Q Fco� ��2 (Vn( v Oa 0m 0(0 O 1rn NO N oO a MN hN0 0M IrN�0 OuM-> oo NN Oap 0_°' M N OO O N O " O Nm Of m W ° o OL O Z rn m O O r (0 N aO (O(MDO NOaMp (NMN❑ U o -� N h O N o p m 0 (0 O (no (ten m opa (ND M m O m m rn m M N v O N (n m N m M m O n N m (o N O � � M N (N (n of r 7 M N N I� d r 7 M N (O d 7 M N N � r 0 a r r a r r r r r r IL o o Z O � N0 (`oo (^Do o (D 0 m m Nvmi vo O � N (Nn (moo � o o ,o O � rmi � rn NM ap W d (p 7 M N O N o u� � r r r r r r r 0 0 --� Cp o (� O O N N m o -> M r M N M N o (D O N N N m a O N (NO a cM0 NN O w Q 7 N N r0 ^ of � a N N uN, (!j N o r a Z p_ r ^ O CL O CL p W Z '� M N c0 _ M 7 (0 M w O M O M M V I� N N 0 a 7 M N coN N (L' 7 M N N 0 0 � - V M N I (fl N a R V M N N (N O r r r (n a ^ N a ^ ^ r r N N m o N (D o a o a s N m o N (n o r�M2! ~ CL M Q M N O O N M (M'J (NO (n m CON M d' M N O (OD d r r r n O ad r r o 7 N M h (0 o - m m (0 a e M O cn N N fr N 7 ` NO � NMMW ` M r r (0 N J 0- r r (n M r [L ^ N a M r O O N o S O N N N 0 o p N N N D M o ry N O r N r O _ O r N W co 0 U Q ! O m N R ^ C4 .N- O ^ c0 p C[ r O m p '- p 0- r ^ ^ O m co (n W r r V p a ^ O N W r r a y •- p Z = _ m 00 N "T 7 M O 0 N ° r m M 0 l0 (o ry O r N m N N } O r v O m N 0 0 0 O ^ N m � N CO 0 Q �' "- N �. M d CC � Z 7 co a Z d O OO �. C) n O (O a N N N M N O r O N a W N N M N r W (6 O f� N (0 (D f� N ``-j W H O (0 O N N N (6 O I� N i0 CO I� (O i ❑ O M N N M N N n� Q' m M r N N O N „t O = K O M N N M v y O } a o M N voi a O 0 a o r r r r lo o r r r r (o . �. KrdCL !L d N IL mN O m @ C`) O m (D r O N m OQm cDmO Q N O N C7 a � N l0 (O m O O a 7 � N V (0 V1 m O O m C7 = a (n v (n (n I = m F- N N M M M N M M M M `o a Of K O O N M M M 0 n m a o N r <n M c mQGn m Q UmQrrr a m r r U0 Q w w a w p a 0 O� a W 0 o r N O !L m S Q m O r N m = Q m N m = m O .N- Q m r r H co O r r r H M CD r a CD n 00 f0 l0 N N 0 c0 M O T 0000 N co n T O (3) T O O M M M M O M M N M M N M M ry mcoorn m � D m -� r� warn N M O 7 N N N cD in O N c!i M n N N 01 O N O O O c\1 O n 7 m O N p M a N � .- a N u� CO a ry M M c a ry cn n M cn cn a N �oo M o n 'D M o M N 0 N — o CO rn CoN v o O NM O N �n _ O c\ oco O N nN Nvm o o 2 0 2 p v n a' p M cD M cn 2 0 cn cD NIL ry a ry N O a N M M a N n- o N M 0 L O O N M (O O N n O N 00 O N qT M cc O N U a °' ocoo a mmM a o' cMnou`y'i u� [if o `n O N rn n o D> n v 0 01 0 m m '� m c0 7 co p Mot: 0) Z O N n O N O O w D M O O (D M M O M N O a °' nU) a OM m mm a � � a = � F- W co V' 1n O M o0 co M m M O N M N M M O O NM O O nN cnM O co coaa O nm a n O a n a M M M 0. N a CL Z 0 co N M M n fD V M M O) M 0) 00 N N O 0) W O cD n N 0 O O M O M O n W IL a � Lo CL m EL tc) J Q M co CO a to V' co O 0) CO N n cD 00 07 00 O M O 00 cn0 O O O O _ co cD O o 00 O 00 0o co w O Z a no a n to a nAr AA a u' nuN n � a n � � o W a Z -' U) O OI cn 0) O "� LO cO N ID N '� n n O U) 00 N O 00 O m rn O n cD n co O 00 ro 00 co O a o O a voo a 'vu� � a = MM Mm a s uN � � a v nm V � coo aco M Ma a U m OD o 'p ? o a a n [I a M M M M a M n n n n a M Q N H N M M O OI 00 00 C 0 co 00 N CO D) Of m N ItD7 n (O 0 O cn m m O o N 0D M O m a0 O n n O o n in o 7 cn M a CCW O M O) Ocn cn cn Ma M M M M a cn U� cn a `- { IT O N n d' n n n c0 O V N cD O O O N n n a - a. � cn CO Oc�n N N O — O 7 N N M O O O O ap 0 O (D a — a m a M M 'tn� w Co O O o w O no 0o O op oo O o It o � O nN om C� N W 0) O a0 0 0 p p a O LLM') ctM'J 4� a rMi M oMi rMi a a a v v a a 7 v v Q a Oa D 0 M O M M O N M N M n O n 0 0 0 tf M U 0 O o co 000 O 7 cn co cn ro O a s v v O N N O vni cD cn cD m O O p 0 a' m N N N N a' m N N N N a^ m 0 O m (0 O Ur a 0 a a O M M M M a 0 Ln LO cn In a 0 w LU a o m m ro m a o 0 0 0 o Q o cc co co ID Q o 0 0 0) 0) CO a o 0 0 0 0 Z ❑ a o 0 0 ❑ o 0 0 0 2 o 0 o o ❑ o 0 0 0 ❑ O Y U o a o 0 o cn V o vryi vryi °� V o co m n M N U o vryi F U o n r� n n a a a a a Co a a a s a � a O a w w w O w w a a Q o a s rn a ca+� a 2 a x co a' M M a ❑ a' M M Q O a O ❑ a O O H a M M a o1 O o m � (7 co to 2 C7 v7 co co cn 2 C7 2 2 2 2 C� co co C? Y LULU ww cD LULU ww c� nu� u� o MM MM 0 c C. i a 0000 000e o000 x (O m CO r X 7 r a r x (O M (D M x N N V V c X ID O N m o X 7 O V m o X M m M D) X (O M N O ` % M m (0 O "' % M m M 0 O % m M m M O "' X m °J co M 0 ❑ X n (° O ❑ x a N a N 0 ❑ X (O m (D m 0 ❑ X (D (O r fo O O O O N N N N 7 V' O (O O M 01 M O m V 0 7 (O M r OD (0 0) m N O N O (D M m O M O m O co ry m (O 0) m �O O O o 0 0 jp m M M Cl) M �p N O M N O In (n IA UA Ln N M M M M It It cr 7 d' - M M M M M N L N N e e e o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q N m X x N m N m o X N O N 0) X r O O M V U N a X e- r (n o X (D � m a o X M 7 M 7 ° X Q) (D M O C U M N v V N O v 0 r 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 y N Y Y@ 76 0 0 0 0 Z O N w % N N n w m m X O 0 O D O % O mrr m x vvv OxmCwC a xnmrm ❑ xvv ° on m .. �. C) ¢ a > CO CO In n o r v r m M M (D M 0) M LLJ O U U 0 r M m r N W N m N O O IA 0 7 M m ° N N N N N 0 7 a 7 7 V O M M N M N IL z > > > r o000 — — — 000e 000e Z 0 CC 0 o x a m a M o X v o a o o x a v X o N v rn W � O � O X nrnCDrn X Dn Dn Xn nn n XMmam (0 u) Ln � O O N N N V N N N N O O v J 2 2 } Y } > w ❑ Xry °° rnm � � % (0nm (°° a0 rn � XM �Mv Wit] XNc(°Oa W 0 ID a Zm Q r rn (D ro r 0 0 m o m m o M o M N 0) r (o ro W M M M [") O m O O M m O W m W Q) O N O O p 0 0 Q) m 0 H 4] (O (D (O (() F N N N N N F- C 7 7 7 d' H CN M m .N- D a` a` a a` H N v o o a o 0 o e v o 0 0 0 0 0 F o x 0 a 0 x N m N m X 00 N N (O U o X M r r O) X M r M n X 0) V n 0 X (11 O a O 0 m N U ° ° m rn rn _ _ rn U U q-: X N M m „- x N N X O r O N r 't X M N -O Q Q 0 ❑ X "r (O m ❑ X °) °) N, 0) ❑ X m If) T ❑ X J a, rn .� rn rn rn O m 'o 0 O o S a ° ° O m 7 M m O 0) O 0) N N M M O y6 OD a ND a00 N d' N O m CO N W N m °) m m r , U ❑ `-' O 0) rn rn r n O a0 m r m n O O O O O m O ry N N N N (n Z4- Z O c c C 3 � O N o 0 0 ° a o o e e o 0 0 o a m Q O U O O o X (D m CO (V X N (O N o X (n N lfl N X (o m (o a � O X r M m O o X r r n n x O a Q ° X M 't M QO O 0 0 0 o N N v N v N o 0 0 0 O w Q o 0 o � ` a O a m m c ° w X a N v X co m D O o `^ X n h h (0O X n N n oE u O x v N (n ❑ x r v n v X C °) C °) ❑ x v w m O z a 0 IL II O M M m m (° m (D m @ M m o m o v ro — 0) CO IL II II O) V N t0 m m n v n It d' (D (() m () 7 7 V V co m O n m m m n O r m m m m O m r n n r ° N N N N N o H to LO UA (n H N N N N N F M M M M M 1- 0 O W J M M Q J M CQ') Q J M (`Q') Q J M m Q J W Q c0 (D W Q (D m W Q m m y ¢ (o .- to N ca ❑ W W W W O ❑ W W W W r ❑ W W W W 0 ❑ W W W W Q m a M Z) M M M M m M M M M H M M M M H M M M M U` Y ¢ a` aaa 0 (D ¢ a. a` a0-` (D aaaa acDQaa` aa n co 1 0 N O N O a o 0 0 o e i 0 0 o e o 0 0 o e o x M (O M (0 x n x O N (O N o x 0 0 0 7 o X M )0 M n o X r O r 0 X (0 0 (0 0 X r 0 O X X n N n N O X M N M )0 " x 0 w 0 CO O ❑ X r 0 r O ❑ x M O ❑ x r O ❑ x v N v N N N N N n 0 10 O V O N Ih N n N 00 O w O 00 O N O c0 N 0 10 M O M M M M M 0 O 0 W °0 N O O ` QN Inf1 In0 M M M M M (0n V V V V a M Cl) M M G r F F - r r r r N v W e° o ' o o° o 0 0 0 0 0 o O f6 m x In o in n o x a M v M x n n n n x N n v o �+ N o X a s M a X (p r (p r o X )0 N (0 N o X N (D a0 N V U U O r 0 0 O r O r N N N N r r O r O C fA YO d Y m NO �x( Oi w x O' '.C_ ��(( O t0 O (0 O x n 0> 10 Z 0 p) L L O ❑ X N 00 N O ❑ X N M N M O ❑ X O ❑ X rD N r O @ It O O O O m m N N N N U Q > Y >+ 10 r 0 (p f 10 r 10 r M M 0 M 0) N 0 n (O W O U U M ID O mn M 0) (O m (o 00 (O n Cl) 0 00 M 0) n m m � n 'aN N M N M �ry O n n n n (D 00 0) n O] O Fn C m m O LO LO N 10 m O M M M M M 0 7 Q V -It 70 M M M M M � y Y F- H H 0 r r r r a. H } } } } o o e ao 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 �Z ° x M v v x (o CO M M o 0) o M o x n (M v o W 00 O O o X a M N e X w o m o rn m rn o o X N a) m o o ov (o ov ro In M �n M v o r T _ O Q Q Q a o rn rn h x o m o m O ` x o w x v o n N w w m r W a M x M - x v r x n M N o Z } } } oo Q oo x n oo O x oo O x r r r rn w r M O N N N N d Z O M < N a to N MV (O 7 fo jD V 0 0 0 0) N 00) C Il- O n (O (0 O (0 0 M M M M M 0 7 In W M M M O n (D (D (0 (0 O N N N N N O (O (O (0 (D (O O M M M M M D a` a` a a to o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F- o X O M X w 0 00 O X O M O o X M O M U X M r 0 (D ° x O M O M ° X 0 M 0 M C J (p N Cj t t o Cl) Cl 0 aQ o X (� (ONm o (5 XmvMv op X v U1) vIOn oo X1a0nm O O > > N N N N O O O O O _ n- M 0 N M 10 M (O )0 10 N M n M n 0) n 10 10 N () ❑ !. .' F0. 7 N M V n �0 N 0) 00 0 M n O) n O) d. N Z Q 10 O n n n n n O r N O F- )0 i0 M )0 M M M M a K 7 V V H r Z U y C 4L C J D Q U y N o 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o U c �m a 4 0vmva X °n) v °n) N Xrnvrnv Xv - Vo Q 0 a m (D o r o r o 0 0 0 0 : 2 O O Q O o r � r V .... � r r O O N N C C) w X n N (`� O '� x a W (O O x M N M N X tyO N N M U ❑W 9 E 0 ` X - „ x „_ X O O X n.. 0 E � oo � x °� o � x � � � M oo ❑ x � � � � O O z a N N N N O O a m II N V n N O) O) (0 l0 @ w (0 (0 10 (o II t6 (D O 00 0) 0 CD II N O M M V N N 0) l0 n �0 1� 7 0 00 M M D O) N N of ap 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 7 7 7 't O ~ ❑ ° F- 10 )0 LL7 0 10 F M M M M M F- 7 V 7 V a H y Q (O M m m Q o M m wQ o (r (Dy Q (o M COO m 1 J 0 W W W W W 1 ❑ W W LLI W (`) 7 w w w w - O ❑ W W W W >( m (0 F- M M M M N O 0) O d a- d d U' (° 3 a d a 0- O rn Q d d IL d Q (D Q d a` a` a o C• I a 1 a C 0-1 U N n - t0 tF- -6 -E c o N E n m 4 N a o ECo a� O O @ U m u n C m @ oE o Oop _= C m O O fq Y Y m Om o o a o m o 0 0 0 of o o a a MM o o e a Z N O N o x N I� N N o x O N O N @ o x O M m N E o x t m m m O, L L N X N N (� [O N x o) O co cD O x M O O N N X N M m m O I` "C > 0 0 0 0 > O O O O > O O O O > O O O O > O m m Q Q Q Q U a ' > v W m o U U o rn m I c c' m m = x N co <o m t= 'x o- o�n m N m rn '� x m rn co N Y C Q ❑ x N N, 7,M Q ❑ x Q ❑ x N N Q ❑ x - d' CD (D Y IL .6 -6 ,d } > } o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z o x M (� o x v a a a o x (� N o x W F U F- U x M (O d' X N M c0 M X N 1� N f� x U) � O O v 0 0 0 0 0 v V N v O V J = _ Z } Y } Y o ❑ x M �° oo x C, ❑ X .� �. oo x 11J m O n O N N N N a Z CO (QD - m m 1� 0) N (O m N m LO m m (O m (!J f0 O w m Cl) N m 1� M N O f� m 1� m m N (O N (O LLI M � � � H O O (NOFO- N ao- a` a F- N e a o 0 0 0 0 o 0 _ _ o x M I� M O o x N N x 7 o x N N m W U x m O M I� x M (D M (D o X 7 a 7 X N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N v 0 r F- U) (p U j m ... W co v M O O X r M N O " X O X O QO O 00 `�- X f� M M r -O Q Q 1� X � ` X O m O m f� X M N M N n ` X r O (O J 0 0 x (n m y oo x r oo O x v �. .� o0 0 X O cu j j N N N N O O O O O a N (O of m y U ❑ m I/ Z z 0) p M a M co 0 O Z Q C C C C O O C = N N o a o a o 0 0 0 o c o 0 m Q U O D x m (O N o x (D O o x w c0 of (o o x 0 7 r 0 a ? U U o x Q I] 7 U N O .N.i .�.i .N_. N O O O O � N — `- Q O O Z a d, U U N N C O x N N a - Oi w. (`� O "' X ( ( CO 0 O `- X (O M 7 W L 1] O (D X t - O N M x (� x m n n (f) X M (D M 0 ❑ O E `2 O ❑ X — � � ❑ X N O N � ❑ X .�... p ❑ xm � M-N W O Z a N N N N O � a m II N M - m N N a (D O (O O O CO (0 l0 co 7 M 1� N (O a M �Y M 7 a M O N N 11 II p O w m m W O O N O O O O 0 7 0 O � ❑ c J M M Q J M M Q J M cQ') Q J M (`Q') Q W N a - Cc - Cfl N Q o (D N Q m o N Q (D CD N J (O N D W W W W m W W W W N (`( 0 w w w LU D W W W W m (O F_ M M co M a CO F- M M M M '0 F- M m M M F-- Co M CM M H (DY Qo. � � a 0m Qaa` aa U' m aaaaa < 0 Qaaaa n Appendix A.2 - CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN IEnrollment Projections >_" M 7 N (OO E � Cl) v (O Co O O O r W O O O O N > 0 C) C) 0 i O N M O C N U') LO M M (O Q � io0oo m LL O N O (o co r N O N co (O ( � (o (O 6) 1 O O coO 1 'Irr c0 O N 0) O M d (O f-- 01 O N M � co N co C L O N 3 Z -C -C m C 7 U) «� U) 2 Lo r r 7 O) r 3 O (o (o co e0 co O O O 0 0 0 0 � co M co O O N M N .. p (0 N N O N r N fA N LL W fn F C uo O (o (O (O (O O 01 N E N , R N a V V aD 0 0 Cl O O O O N 0)) 7 7 0 M CD N c) O) r O G O r O N O � � N C y M co rlc\l LO M Q ) r0 (O V O O1 C V to O 0 0 C) O O O O O 0) �. � O (V V (O C N r r CO M r0 )O N N r C ` N N � O , U aciCN U N O (O O LO (O O co O) I� W (O r O H O C) N N (O M N (0 (D N O O O O O O O M N N M O � ` C r ( r C) It r d CN L. N N C_ N o a I r _ r d N N N a r 0 0 0 0 coco N cD N H y N C N O Lo I� co M Cl) O N N Cl) r r (O C) N ^ O Cl) Cn Cl) V 14 H y N = N r r r M �-- N co M 7 r N O N C) N r r 1() C N _ W w O w Co J O O y H = _ Q d N U O O O � O Ln N m O co co M (o O N co O O d' V m C a N (O (O O V N N h O (O O I- M (6 N a > 0 2 N r co N N co co V r V V M c7 <t V r CD r co co (,.) 0 L.Q a a C N �_ O w tCp C 00 to (p O 0 0 0I� O co M co co aD M V (O co V O N co 7 0 N m o C C C N T" 1� co N n M M r r CO O) M co V 7 r p0 ap V V r N N N v J N Q a c Qo a s y 2 j— 1 Y Y � 0oa ? CO (nro) 11 o Yo o )E mW Su , =° c -(V o(°D (o L @ ELL 00 -0 -0 • U@ a) W o Q E (n O w O 1p 0) aN a aN F Q ( LL E c m E aaa daa ua2 CL d d a E ao Mo 0)J� oo m m 3 � 0 7 LL 3 o c Z o �' d o f d Co o m o ) j 0 2 aLL Y m -o g m= c o o a) E W x E N c o in a a) a) ° (n � ° (n` £ w O ayi m m m 3 F' m a) owl co owl o w � 3 mma m m (o ° JJ a J O IL U z O N C Z Q a m a Gyi W N 7 m p d 3 Y Y Y V co �j N (O LO 00 W M r N V C p (O co 00 0o co W O 0� M M M M N O N LD r r M O M M "I' In M CDN co { M M OJ OJ CO O O W W M M r M O N co m rl_ n l� r- r` r` r` n rn rn ao o rO r 0 cli C) N c o o c o 0 0 o c e c c c e 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 o a o o a L co _ O (O V V O O) O CO N CD V O O ` _ I� O) O) O r N M tD CO I- <f LO CO O N Ln I` u) co co O N co O I-- O cO N (p �!) M (D CO CO CD 00 f� CO 00 o co M CO f• n t` O M co t` O C) O N r N C I� co M I-- r- co M I� M I` M co Cl) O N O Cp 0 M (D CO N M O M (D (D M M M U N > C) I- 'ITW 00 O M -ITM M M r M (Dm 0 0 0 r N N M V CD V M lC') Q (n O M M C, M 't (D M I� Cl) O M O TM M M M O CD C) O M CO N r r r r r d N m r r r r r r 10 r rLo N > M tO V M 7 M M 7 (D (D O N CO o N M m "t 7 7 0 In co N r M (D O co N V 7 O M M r V O (n V O O Ii N N N N N N N N N Cl) CO N N Cl) O O O O O o 0 0 o N M M M O ` N r r r r r r r r r r r W N !d r I 7 O � _O N N N N N N N M O (O V M O rn o i (Mi can cMD LO m C) M p p O 0 0 - - - Y r r 0 06 = O � O W u) V W C M O V (D O O N co y O N N M W M V N N O N O p 00 N V V O (A M I� l0 V LL� Q O M V 0 i� S O N V 7 3 B M O O O O O O O O N M M M M Cl) M �m a � rrrrrrrrrrr �, o � 0000 ( osomr � O r r N y N !s Y M O O O Ql 3 M O 0 p �O M M N M LO V co n d) M N M � o O 07 (D N N Cl) H d �J rn OOi m O rn O p p M M 0 0 Z > mCo p c C O >� e e e e e o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C y C o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o e O O yC\j (_O O V O (O N o C Q U N M 0 O r N ('MI N (MD r V N W O � O co W P M � N N M co CO i(D � (D N O O E a O O r r N 0 N M U y > N D J (O CO (O h I� rn rr I-- r M M 00 Ih 0 O O r r r r r p N d p_ .6 T O ` O d a m N CO d f�6 N O 00 N M O M V fD 00 00 M O M O1 p N N M (fl r W M (� f� V O N O N N N co co M (a N m O M V (D Z (� W M M M M O O O O O T N d. (D M M M M M O r r 0 7 N O M M C M Q Q r r r r r (o Q o U Z + W W y W m y o m N Q Q r N M d' ID (D f� O M rO •- (V 2C� M m O r N M 7 Lo (D I,- 00 M Or r N I � 0 ca m i 00 0 @ r M m M (D M (D LO (D LO M M V 1` coM a U LO Ln (D r- m LO m m co co W N m V' LO M y C) N N N N N N LO N N N 00 LO (n M M W N C) O r r r r r r r r r Cl) r r r r LO N C` � a r@ O 1` M r- LO 7 N IT N M r CO M m o V C, M M It (D co M M [D M N M m V N O@ N N N N N N 7 N N N OD LO 0 M M r- O W O p r r r r r r r r r M r r r r Ln N d @ co V N M M O V N CD M Ln O o n M LO M M of O r�- 7 C) 'It n V CO o LO V O LO (D m m 0) V N m V N V LO N m Ln V w N N M m co co 1` m LO m LO m (o r N 0 M O @ r r r r r N C) N N N (D Ln d' M N (D c m r a) r N N N N N co N N N r-- LO V M M f� N N r0 O r r r r r r f� r r r M r r r r In r 0 O M r r r r LO r N 4 N a` Lna 'oa @ (D M 1` V N M LO � r L- r (O O M N o @ O LO r- (D m N M N V (D N m Ln 00 LO f� o U M LO M 1` M 00 N O V V V LO (D N N N V D 0 0 M Ln of LO M V co V Lo Ln N 00 I� M N N N CO LO d' CO N (D O M r N N N N N N N N N r LO v- M M co pO r r r r r r (p r r r M r r r r m O N p O r r r r r r r r r M r r r r LO (O N V N d. N d LO M r W (D M V M n M (D V' Il r-- 7 M o @ N I,- M I,- LO M V M r M N LO r LO � t\ u aj U 00 M "t M I` m m I� w O m O Cl) 7 n (D m m m A U V t` � M O N r 0 M LO M M LO M 00 M � @ O r r W r r N LO M V' M r �} m (0 N a) r r r N N r N N N (D 7 M N LO N V M m p O r r r r r r (D r r r M r r r Ln rp O r r r 1� r r r M r r r r LO r N O N d (V a O N a Cl) a U LO M LO 7 O (b m V V M M r (p o 7 M M (D M (D LO m N (D M CD 0 LO (D o M C,4 U CD r N 'ct (c) t CD LO n co O m N LO m (D m U r V Ln Ln 1` � N o0 M W cc (o N (D V C. 0) O N cu r d O r r (` r r r Ln '� d' N r Cl) � r � @ r r M r r LO V { � N V Ln 7 � p O r r r r r r (D r r r M r r r r LO r M O O r r r r r r (D r r r M r r Ln r M N a` N 2 N C N a N a O .@. Ln 00 m V (O V V M (D m Ln N c0 O O O M o co 1 � N O m M W N N M R 1` m 00 m 1` O V 't e N m O N O N O Zt M LO M W N CO LO N_ O r 00 r r N N LD N CD V LO CD LO N cO M 00 M 0L r O O r r (D r r � M N (D O O r r f� r r � � Cl) N �-- M M O rp O r r r r r r M r r r M r r r r LO Ln N N � O r r r r r r (D r r r M r r r r LO N N a r N a r d r a1 @ CO M O r- CD N 7 0 I. r d' m Ln o `- @ ,r n M N (D M � M N LO O C) N O o E O@ O O O O O r Lo 0 eN- r M 00 M r CO � O N @ O O O O O M LM r m O M M N O N 0 Lo O p O r r r r r r CO r r r M r r r r Ln r p p O r r r r r r (D r r r Cl) r r r r LO r c N a N a r W O a p a `- •@-' N_ V co CO m LO IN (D 7 O O 7 t` V OD M M o U -IT r-- V w N 00 V LO O LO O W 00 Ln (D r r o @ p) (D C) LO r r O) N cD o0 m m m r M r N M (T @ N LO V' Ln m W CD m N (D o0 (D r N Lb coO O O O O O O O r O N M r N N N (`) p O O O O O O M O r O N M N N M @ p O r r r r r r r r r M r r r r LO r 0 O O r r r r r r O r r r M r r r r LO r 0 N a N a` a) -O (tea (D 0@ l_O V tL V M 00 (D 7 (D (D (D r O N M M C�+ L�9 O C) @ LOz co 7 tp M W O V (D (D (D r O N M M C + 3 t M 7 0 04 0 0 0 0 M O Cl) 0 N N M Cl) Cl) N E L p U � 0 0 0 0 0 M 0 0 0 OCN N M M M N U m [� V p Q r r r r r (D r r r M r r r r M r @ u p Q r r r r r CD r r r M r r r r LO r m ) m N O V 7 N O r @ U U � o V � o CNJ O 6 W co r O '6 W 00 ) 0 O Ln co p r N :: Y U LO co O r N (y) Im (� (a Q p r N M a LO (D n M m r r M p U@ Q Q r N M 7 U CO r- W M r p O L Y Y 0 ref- O CU' Y Y CJ r � F- a` a` 3 ti k CL coc N 3 V� k O O a o e aQ. -a " ° EL ( as O~ m>to > c0 � V o d 3 O U N N o-alp 3 y O u � c y a M m o c cm c o E o a ° ¢ w m � o E o Co o d To E 'm o m `m `c o m >, a�0i ° � c m a� `c o z o o 0 �L w a) N c a) U Z a ° y >, N a) a) c a) U Z V y y y >w 0) N T a) c6 V y y N _N a7 U) O)@ 0 Q M y O a>i ° ac N O CD ¢ Z y C c m N Z C. 0)) Y n 0 0 7 (x a) O) Y Q 0 o � m i T W a W a (1) r m W M V N m N 1� m LO M 7 Ln O n C O 7 n 7 CD Ln V r m LO C N r V � Lo N In O -It CO N V CO Lo (O Lo m (O N O N N r W N N N W LO It NCO O N N N N N N t` LO -,I- M M r0 O r r r M r r r M r .- r r LO p 0 r r r r r M r r r r LO N d N d c ull) Lo a o r- I.- Lo LO V' LO V I� I� r� (O O O N I� O) m N N 7 W N m LO W W I, n m W N 0 V V V Lo (O c O) W N Ln Cl) :r M V LO Lf) N co N r r r ti N N N W LO 'IT CO N (O d N r r N N N N I-- LO V Cl) co (O r0 O r r r r d' r r r CO r r r r LO p 0 r r r r M r r r r Lo N d N d v a CL) a a o M Cl) N r CO d' 7 W � m co 'It h I` V I, N M LO Cl) W r M N LO LO f� N O m (D V (O m LO t` co O (O O ri V I- co O W W 7r� N (D M LO m M Lo M O M O r W r r N W LO -ItM It M O r N N N N (D d' It M N LO O) N p 0 r r r r r Lo r r r M r r r r LO r0 0 r r r r r r r r M r r r r LO O (V a` N 0- Cl) a Cl) a L CD M m 1� t` V N f� W m V a M r W N o M N I-- m (O W LO LO m N (D m (O LO LO co r o i O N M O N (D 7 0 Ln � (O O O) N Lo m co 0 0 O N co O N F- W m W (O (O N W O m N N 00 W r r r r r r Lo C V N r M W LP N N m r r CO r r LO V V N N V' V c) O r r r r r r (p r r r M r r r r LO LO M O O r r r r r r (O r r r CO r r r r LO r M N N a` N 2 p a N a a) Lo m m < ,I- ti O O CD(O M (D (O M N W N o O L) LO N O (O W N r f� m W m I-- (D w O (O r- W N O N W 7 M Lo M W N N(o LO = W V 7 O (O r- W N N Lo m (D (O LO N (O m W W o m N r m O 0 C) r r M r r r � It M N 0 r M r 7 LO m 0 0 0 r r r (D r r 't "t M N r (NN pp O r r r r r r (D r r r M r r r r to LO N O O r r r r r r (O r r r M r r r r LO r N N a` p U � N r, O � O N N a 0 � r � 0 r LO N o U I- LO A W N (D LO V M N V) r O r O N C o E p O W W I` W r N O N LO Il- W M r m N N O p O W W n O M (D r r LO W W M Lo LO m m LD O O O O O O r �' r r M M CO r r O co f� r m O 0 (D 0 r r tr r r r M M M r N 0 M r O p O r r r r r r W r r r M r r r r W O p O r r r r r r (D r r r CO r r r r LO p C N a r N T w C. a o a p a7 m O Lo (co W LO r- O m N (O W m m (QD r- M Cl) m (D O LO V LO m co M m ON CO W (D W r Ln N W O @ > O m 0 0 0 0 0 M O r O N M r N N ^ r a) m 0 0 0 00 M O r O N M N N M W O coa• p O m r r r r r cD r r r Cl) r r r r LO O p O m r r r r r W r r r M r r r r LO V O N d N a` 7 E p 7 O m _ T+ :.r O m a O O m LO v W c m W W V (O W W O N m coM D (a 0 C) (6 LO cr W V' m W (D 7 W (D W O N m co C)+ �"� N � co r N V 7 co m m M (� O LO W lO m O m N 7 co N T V W _M m CO r- O LO V LO LO m O m N C = a U 0 0 0 0 0 r O 0 0 N N M M M N v 3 L p V 0 0 0 0 0 O O O N N Co c') M N N V �p] O V O Q r r r r r (O r r r M r r r r LO r m E L„) O Q r r r r r (D r r r M r r r r LO (p (y_1 A N O U O a. N r p U (D o V o W = W d O U O O a) 0) r 1�0 O r N M L!) co t• co m 0 r ~ (� Q r N M Ui W W m `- 04 a Q�, Y F O C� Y H a' M CL nCL p m v_ k c ` u _ O a) pL _ a O G « _ B c > � ' d (n (D0 > a > i ' n a� 0 > aD D,2J O v N N Z U J j O ._,,, 7 Z O a p_ ` e� O. C 7 cn 0) 0> 2 H G3i U O O p"OO y p) Q L) a) O O rn E > o@ c d m o f a � o e m 0) g E r p E (B O t a � � i > p E N a L N M oEaso � � 3 oE (ao L � z .a o (n �, E ) c N U z o V) E a c N U (D V N Q > O La Q R d = co O)�0 IL Q U 3 d = CY tll Y6 C rn W (O O al N O O W m W O d (9 O O O O m o ,�, -Z3 oa -0X- � o m o a)-0 o ma � L a w1 a Q z y 0 i [: i c 7 o N a z y 0 i G R c o N (n `m � EQa) 0) Ye L) � F Ena� C) a�0 1 D co m 1 Appendix A.3 Student Generation Survey o 0c) C.0 00 C%j o , o P-- Lo rI coMOMOMOLnC'ILjo lC,:) 0MO000NLnMOLONOOr00rDN0OLC) MM Lnl1') ODOO d- OOM V NI- N LO LONL° (D (Dr N � r- O') zt f- I- r- M d) M M O) M N LO LO CO O O r O r O CD r r M O r O O O O O O O O r O O O O O r r O OOM (D � � O O LOCD M0 r- M NCO LO LO M M O COr N Or 000O M OO r 0 0 0 M O M LO N CO CO (M I- O (D L- LO M LO cO r CO O r O (A LO r N N d- O N M LO f- N CY) NMNMNCD O CO CO LL0 CD 0 0 CD CD C) CD CD 0 0 0 CD 0 0 0 0 0 C) CD CD 0 0 0 C) 0 0 CD 0 w QD N L co O "t O) O O N co O LO m 00 M � M M 0 Cl CO M M M O M r LO �t O LO N Q pCONr CD CO CD M 0 N M �t CO O M CO M L° O M I�- r 0 I1- (0 N 4- C) M n Ur r "T N Nr O �P M Nr M O Or O Or Nr M Nr O N Or co co Or _ 0 0 0 O O O O O r CD 0 CD 0 (D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CD 0 CD 0 0 CD 0 0 a) a M � f� lOr Oln I, MOCO MOD COr I� rin MIS N L" 0O LnN000 VO M N Lf) r m 0 cO CD CO LO 4 OD co (O LA Na) N � (O M 4 t` io 4 <5 c5 rll) MCOMMMCOf- NI:rrN V; rNMrMCO :TrN V' NLnLnO) NM p 0 0 0 0 C) 0 0 0 c 0 0 0 0 0 CD CD CD CD 0 CD 0 (:, (o 0 0 0 0 C) c) 0 N (D r I- N r (D M LO LO N r M O L ) (D CO (D r M N N � 0 0 (O (D tor O � rNrCOrrr L() COMMCO V I� r (O 1:T MNM y r Q) O H N CO Mr O -�t LO Mr N W r� r� Or M W M r Nr CO N N Or M (O M LO CO) N r r r M r N r r M _ N 0 O O N p O Mqt co O (D N CO r M Lo rl- Lo!0 (0 M N M N N �t O M N r r (D It to t r r r r CO r r N N U m c Ln Lh � rlf) NOf� LC) ,KtCDN Ln06) LOM = Mrr � dl LOLOLnMd' CDOOMII- Q E r M N Nrr M L- � (M r Mr L- O { W O 0 L c U N a O O O O M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Cl) Y d. L O M C. � C7 O V L) Q E 0 CL 0M (DLOW (0 '9TO (D0 mMM (D V �tX = MW ON o V MNrl1) NNr r LO (Dmr� 00ON co q- MrrM CD V > C C r r O Q' 3 3 V ,t) OOr V NCOOMCO Lo 00 (D � CD CD Or M M Cf) CD � � 0O r M CO r O NM N CO Nr U') NNr r LO CD 0O I- O 00 (V co "tMr rM CDN Vd1 tl) N r r _ ` r C � CL r p L O 7 C } d c p (n Z U) 0 0 ca J E V) me ° c rn ° aJ)n ;i p 0N LnZ o � c co LL E m a�i `� °' t o = Y �o � � F�- ~ » ate = aci � y a? 3 vi vi o W ° a pU m Lo o ° a � � p - � > m o � 22 .- J CD � c CL a) c c c c c c E > p a) c Ue O c •• L `" (C O 75 (0 L6 La (0 m c L- U Uco Z > p pCL -0 O` C N = Y Y Y 1p N p L > L) L) m a) (LO a) @ C+0 N (�0 41 - Vl 7 :L- N m (0 (0 a) (p a LC (0 LE a) = f6 LB (0 > > a) N c_ C L>6 p Q Q Q m U U 0 o 2 Y Y J J J J J J J � � � � � 2' (n >>1 I O N 00 M O (0 CO O 0) V' Lo M M r N Lo U-) c) U) � M h LC) N V' O (o 00 Lr) 00 00 (D T O r M N N M (D I- N co V' N r (o T N r T (D N CO N r r r T r 00 M H � T 00 Co - (0 t-- fl .LO � LO N T M N T M (o -,tT Lo T co M I- 0) T ,t N r l(') r N In V co M !O L) T v T (D T T Ln N U) M l0 fq LL !n 0 2 2 0 0 m m 1` O ti LO � (D CM LO N T 00 (N O CO L() V• T L(') r M M (0 1- O N N r V' T N 't V' CM N M c N r d r LA r r LoN Lo (M (D a CD a_ LO r - N L!7 r O t N CO LO V' (D N W M O M � (O R M N m V' M m M 'T CO (0 Ln N E T T r r M O E T T N N M T M r V O O T T T h N 0) W W NN � LO ri R r r N CO w O O O It V T O � T o 0 N d NMV' ttco V' Y U V U cc`m �Q Cl)o E 00 (DhNM M T T _ W O T W O cci C_ U N M M Co Lo M a r � t- Ln CO (D W O) V' CO T CO N O (D M O O "I. O O) co M 0) Lo Co (D V N V' V' coV' O 00 N CO r LA r- N T M N M N N O r- M z r N r N N T T M L 0 m . rN m 'Q M rMr M N (D O V O V N O O la o 000 (�fNM000ti � U 0 00 C) 0 0 0 0000 0 000000000000 > C C y R y LO Cf L L 7 UO UO Cl (D 10 LO 00 O) r V- r� Lo 00 Co CO O) V' 00 T 00 N O (o (M O O V' O 0) 00 M O LO 00 (D r (D N P- N T (D y CO T LO r� 00 T O) N (M N N O t� CO v T N T N N r r r y N T T T U) (D m T M T o') T !_ L) }' V r L C L Da D a L V N L O (D (nn M L 0 r N m c°n vi m J E a) a) d E cn -- m m U) •- (o R cn a) 2 (0 m L (n L Z 3 C m m c Z cn m o n a ° W m Q c c o c (n >Z c ._ m ° a) Cl. m 0 m m (°)i a) ° m c°)i a) L d C _ m ° .. W CL o ° a c c a E c c c c a� ° m m .r ° a) ( ) a ° c a� w a m m U O ` c c o O 0 ° ° ° (n w d 2 > — c c c c m ° a� d N O) d a) N N LL Of O) N 10 (D � C' ` (n ` N m N m 07 C = c (6 O N Z o > m E �c �c > m O > U m m a C L — L N N C i Y Y 3 V5Na mUJJw � N o QQ Om00� 00m oo000 W 222YY JJ -i Zcn to > > � r U7 N O I� O CO r N V7 N r N Ln � I- N N V In N Lf) M r O Lf) r N r� (D (D O O r 0 0 N N w o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (6 V) ~ CO Lo CD I- Lf) O C'M M O N m r O M r N I— i IL Cr) N O (N Lf) r r L0 (D q LL O O O O O O O O c V) = 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N = 0 Lf) N_ CD O) O co M (D `O) y O O M r N CD N M 0 Cl 0 0 0 0 0 0 a O O 00 O O O O O O U) O (A N O M 4) (D O u) r O CD M E I— CONNNU•) U7r0CDh E r o N r 0 0 0 0 0 r r 0 d W O O O O O O O O O O W Co Lo I` O 0 w co A N CD r CM M r r LY) CT m 0 r 0 d• r r O r r r 0 CY) r r 0 N N LC) N CU (D M N r I-- O N M (D O r N cq It .L E M r U7 O Cf7 r N 00 E O r r W W 0 U N � 3 N 'a 0 0 0 0 000 00 0 'a co It 0) N co co co Cn ca u O p 7 r C: H u H v L E O O O >\ MA 00 co O N r M 0) N CO I- CO (D O O r a) V N (D I-- CD O I— r Co (D U Lo co O > C r r CO r co N C r r Q y Q r y Q C� v U u O (A co co N r 0) (A N CO O O N 0 N co ti ' U) 0 N CO ~ r CO N N d I� M N r C L C i � a � a a� Cn cl > E (u E d Q co x co E O 0 J Z Co L co C m O Z m _ _0 Cl c cn m Co «s m O � d c0 C) O O Q m � 3UUacncn = c—o a � � 0 �_ Q. O "O "O C to CL -O Q C (U N O W O c c c c c C C C 7 N — c6 C6 M6 c6 c0 p CO c0 U b c0 J d N N O) O N cu O1 > U — ++ YYYYY (0 O (6 c G mUJJJJJd (n N G Ja- U) i AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT AVENUE TO EXCELLENCE April 24, 2009 cEIVED APR 2 8 2009 CITY OF KEDIT PLAHNINC SERVICES tPam Mottram Department of Planning Services City of Kent 400 West Gowe Street Kent WA 98032 Dear Ms. Mottram: Enclosed are the Determination of Non-Significance ("DNS") and the Environmental Checklist for the adoption of the Auburn School District 2009 Six- Year Capital Facilities Plan. The comment period on the DNS expires at 4:00 p m on May 11, 2009. Sincerely, tia N wPintendent n Business and Operations Enclosures 915 Fourth Street Northeast Aubum,WA 98002 (253)931-4930 DETERNIINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Issued with a 14-day comment and appeals period Description of Proposal: This threshold determination analyzes the environmental impacts associated with the following actions, which are so closely related to each other that they are in effect a single course of action: 1. The adoption of the Auburn School District's 2009-2015 Capital Facilities Plan by the Auburn School District No. 408 for the purposes of planning for the facilities needs of the District; and 2. The amendment of the Comprehensive Plans of King County and the cities of Auburn and Kent to include the Auburn School District's 2009-2015 Capital Facilities Plan as part of the Capital Facilities Element of each jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan. The cities of Algona and Pacific may also amend their Comprehensive Plans to include the Auburn School District's Capital Facilities Plan as part of the Capital Facilities Element of each jurisdiction's ' Comprehensive Plan. Proponent: Auburn School District No. 408 Location of the Proposal: The Auburn School District includes an area of approximately 57 square miles. The Cities of Auburn, Algona, Kent, and Pacific and parts of unincorporated King and Pierce Counties fall within the District's boundaries. Lead Agency: Auburn School District No. 408 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that the proposal does not have a I probable significant adverse environmental impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after a review of the completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public upon request. i This Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date of issue. Comments must be submitted by 4:00 p.m., May 11, 2009. The responsible official will reconsider the DNS based on timely comments and may retain, modify, or, if significant adverse impacts are likely, withdraw the DNS. If the DNS is retained, it will be final after the expiration of the comment deadline. Responsible Official: Mike Newman Deputy Superintendent, Business and Operations Auburn School District No. 408 Telephone: (253)931-4900 Address: Auburn School District 915 4' Street N.E. Auburn, WA 98002 You may appeal this determination in writing by 4:00 p.m., May 11, 2009, to Mike Newman, Deputy Superintendent, Auburn School District No. 408, 915 41' Street N.E., Auburn, WA 98002. Date of Issue: April 24, 2009 Date Published: April 24, 2009 r ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAC 197-11-960 Environmental Checklist. Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21 C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about ' your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best 1 description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. i Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply". In addition, complete the Supplemental Sheet for non- project actions (part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: The adoption of the Auburn School District's 2009 Capital Facilities Plan ("Capital Facilities Plan") for the purposes of planning for the District's facilities needs. The cities of Auburn and Kent and the King County Comprehensive Plans will be amended to include the Auburn School District 2009 Capital Facilities Plan in the Capital Facilities Element of each jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan. The Cities of Algona and Pacific Comprehensive Plans may be amended to include the Auburn School District 2009 Capital Facilities Plan in the Capital Facilities Element of each jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan. A copy of the District's Capital Facilities Plan is available for review in the District's offices. 2. Name of applicant: Auburn School District No. 408. ' 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Auburn School District No. 408 915 e St. N.E. Auburn, WA 98002 Contact Person: Mike Newman, Deputy Superintendent, Business/Operations Telephone: (253) 931-4900 4. Date checklist prepared: April 13, 2009 2 5. Agency requesting checklist: Auburn School District No. 408. 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): The Capital Facilities Plan is scheduled to be adopted by the District on May 11, 2009. After adoption, the District will forward the Capital Facilities Plan to the cities of Auburn, Algona, Kent, and Pacific, and to King County for inclusion in each jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan. The Capital Facilities Plan will be updated annually. Site-specific projects will be subject to project-level environmental review. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. The Capital Facilities Plan sets forth the capital improvement projects that the District plans to implement over the next six years. The District plans to purchase property for and construct a new noddle school and a new elementary school over the next six years to meet projected student population increases. The District may also add portable facilities at existing school sites. The District will also conduct technology modernization projects at facilities throughout the District, construct a special education transition facility, replace three aging schools, and perform multiple facility improvements throughout the District. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have undergone or will undergo additional environmental review, when appropriate, as they are developed. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None known. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. The cities of Auburn and Kent will review and adopt the Capital Facilities Plan for the purposes of updating the cities' school impact fees and incorporating the updated Plan as a part of the Capital Facilities Elements of both the Auburn and Kent Comprehensive Plans. King County will review the Plan for the purposes of implementing the County's 3 i impact fee ordinance and incorporating the Plan as a part of the Capital Facilities Element of the King County Comprehensive Plan. 11. Give a brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) This is a nonproject action. This proposal involves the adoption of the Auburn School District's 2009 Capital Facilities Plan for the purpose of planning the District's facilities needs. This proposal also involves the amendment of the cities of Auburn and Kent Comprehensive Plans and the King County Comprehensive Plan to include the Auburn School District 2009 Capital Facilities Plan as a part of each jurisdiction's Capital Facilities Element of their Comprehensive Plans. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The 2009 Capital Facilities Plan will affect the Auburn School District. The District includes an area of approximately 57 square miles The Cities of Auburn, Algona, Kent, and Pacific, and parts of unincorporated King County fall within the District's boundaries. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other The Auburn School District is comprised of a variety of topographic landforms and gradients. Specific topographic characteristics of the sites at which the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan are located have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 4 b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Specific slope characteristics at the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Specific soil types found at the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 1 d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Unstable soils may exist within the Auburn School District. Specific soil limitations on individual project sites have been or will be identified at the time of project-level environmental review when appropriate. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject, when appropriate, to project-level environmental review and local approval at the time of proposal. Proposed grading projects, as well as the purpose, type, quantity, and source of any fill materials to be used have been or will be identified at that time. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. It is possible that erosion could occur as a result of the construction projects currently proposed in the Capital Facilities Plan. The erosion impacts of the individual projects have been or will be evaluated on a site-specific basis at the time of project-level environmental review when appropriate. Individual projects have been or will be subject to local approval processes. 5 g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings?) The construction projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have required or will require the construction of impervious surfaces. The extent of any impervious cover constructed will vary with each project included in the Capital Facilities Plan. This issue has been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: The erosion potential of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan and appropriate control measures have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Relevant erosion reduction and control requirements have been or will be met. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Various emissions, many construction-related, may result from the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan. The air-quality impacts of each project have been or will be evaluated during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. Any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project- level environmental review when appropriate. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: The individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject to project-level environmental review and relevant local approval processes when appropriate. The District has been or will be required to comply with all 6 Y applicable air regulations and air permit requirements. Proposed measures specific to the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. There is a network of surface water bodies within the Auburn School District. The surface water bodies that are in the immediate vicinity of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. When necessary, the surface water regimes and flow patterns have been or will be researched and incorporated into the designs of the individual projects. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may require work near the j surface waters located within the Auburn School District. Applicable local approval requirements have been or will be satisfied. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Information with respect to the placement or removal of fill and dredge material as a component of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be provided during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Applicable local regulations have been or will be satisfied. 7 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Any surface water withdrawals or diversions required in connection with the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Each project included in the Capital Facilities Plan, if located in a floodplain area, has been or will be required to meet applicable local regulations for flood areas. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. Specific information regarding the discharge of waste materials that may be required as a result of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be provided during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. b. Ground: 1) Will groundwater be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may impact groundwater resources. The impact of the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan on groundwater resources has been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Each project has been or will be subject to applicable local regulations. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. 8 The discharges of waste material that may take place in connection with the projects included in the Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may have stormwater runoff consequences. Specific information regarding the stormwater impacts of each project has been or will be provided during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Each project has been or will be subject to applicable local stormwater regulations. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may result in the discharge of waste materials into ground or surface waters. The specific impacts of each project on ground and surface waters have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Each project has been or will be subject to all applicable regulations regarding the discharge of waste materials into ground and surface waters. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water >� impacts, if any: Specific measures to reduce or control runoff impacts associated with the projects ' included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 9 4. Plants: a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation A variety of vegetative zones are located within the Auburn School District. Inventories of the vegetation located on the sites of the projects proposed in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be developed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Some of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may require the removal or alteration of vegetation. The specific impacts on vegetation of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. The specific impacts to these species from the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be determined during project-level environmental review when appropriate. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plans, or other measures to preserve , or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Measures to preserve or enhance vegetation at the sites of the projects included in the j Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Each project is or will be subject to applicable local landscaping requirements. 10 5. Animals: a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: An inventory of species that have been observed on or near the sites of the projects proposed in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be developed during project- level environmental review when appropriate. rj b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. ' Inventories of threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be developed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. The impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan on migration routes have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Appropriate measures to preserve or enhance wildlife have been or will be determined during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 6. Energy and Natural Reso urces: a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. The State Board of Education requires the completion of a life-cycle cost analysis of all heating, lighting, and insulation systems before it will permit specific school projects to proceed The energy needs of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be determined at the time of specific engineering and site 11 design planning when appropriate. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe: The impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan on the solar potential of adjacent projects have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Energy conservation measures proposed in connection with the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be considered during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 7. Environmental Health: a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan comply or will comply with all current codes, standards, rules, and regulations. Individual projects have been or will be subject to project-level environmental review and local approval at the time they are developed,when appropriate. 12 b. Noise: 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? A variety of noises from traffic, construction, residential, commercial, and industrial areas exists within the Auburn School District. The specific noise sources that may affect the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site 1 The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may create normal construction noises that will exist on short-term bases only. The construction projects could increase traffic around the construction sites on a short-term basis. Because the construction of additional school capacity will increase the capacity of the District's school facilities, this project may create a slight increase in traffic-related or operations-related noise on a long-term basis. Similarly, the placement of portables at school sites will increase the capacity of school facilities and may create a slight increase in traffic-related or operations-related noise. Neither of these potential increases is expected to be significant. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: The projected noise impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be evaluated and mitigated during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Each project is or will be subject to applicable local regulations. 8. Land and Shoreline Use: a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? There are a variety of land uses within the Auburn School District, including residential, commercial, industrial, institutional, utility, open space, recreational, etc. 13 r � b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. The known sites for the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have not been used recently for agriculture �I c. Describe any structures on the site. The structures located on the sites for the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified and described during project-level environmental review when appropriate. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? The structures that will be demolished as a result of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan, if any, have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? The sites that are covered under the Capital Facilities Plan have a variety of zoning classifications under the applicable zoning codes. Site-specific zoning information has been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Inventories of the comprehensive plan designations for the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be completed during project- level environmental review when appropriate. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Shoreline master program designations of the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. r � 14 1 h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Any environmentally sensitive areas located on the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? The Auburn School District currently serves approximately 14,019 full-time equivalent ("FTE") students. Enrollment is expected to increase to approximately 16,117 FTE students by the 2014-2015 school year. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Any displacement of people caused by the projects included in the Capital Facilities j Plan has been or will be evaluated during project-level environmental review when appropriate. However, it is not anticipated that the Capital Facilities Plan, or any of the projects contained therein, will displace any people. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject to project-level environmental review and local approval when appropriate. Proposed mitigating measures have been or will be developed at that time, when necessary. I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The compatibility of the specific projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan with existing uses and plans has been or will be assessed as part of the comprehensive planning process and during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 9. Housing: a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any! Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. No housing units would be provided in connection with the completion of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan. 15 b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. It is not anticipated that the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will eliminate any housing units. The impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan on existing housing have been or will be evaluated during project-level environmental review when appropriate. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Measures to reduce or control any housing impacts caused by the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 10. Aesthetics: a. What is the tallest height of an proposed structure , not including 9 Y P p (s) g antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? The aesthetic impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? The aesthetic impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Appropriate measures to reduce or control the aesthetic impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be determined on a project- level basis when appropriate. 16 11. Light and Glare: a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? The light or glare impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review, when appropriate. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? The light or glare impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Off-site sources of light or glare that may affect the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be evaluated during project-level environmental review when appropriate. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Proposed measures to mitigate light and glare impacts have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 12. Recreation: a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? There are a variety of formal and informal recreational facilities within the Auburn School District. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. The recreational impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 17 The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan, including proposed new school facilities,may enhance recreational opportunities and uses. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Adverse recreational effects of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject to mitigation during project-level environmental review when appropriate. School facilities usually provide recreational facilities to the community in the form of play fields and gymnasiums. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation: a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe There are no known places or objects listed on, or proposed for, such registers for the project sites included in the Capital Facilities Plan. The existence of historic and cultural resources on or next to the sites has been or will be addressed in detail during project-level environmental review when appropriate. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. An inventory of historical sites at or near the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be developed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Appropriate measures will be proposed on a project-level basis when appropriate. 14. Transportation: a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe L proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The impact on public streets and highways of the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 18 b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? The relationship between the specific projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan and public transit has been or will be addressed dunng project-level environmental review when appropriate. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Inventories of parking spaces located at the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan and the impacts of specific projects on parking availability have been or will be conducted during project-level environmental review when appropriate. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). The need for new streets or roads, or improvements to existing streets and roads has been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Use of water, rail, or air transportation has been or will be addressed during project- level environmental review when appropriate. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. ' The traffic impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: The mitigation of traffic impacts associated with the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 19 15. Public Services: a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? if so, generally describe. The District does not anticipate that the projects identified in the Capital Facilities Plan will significantly increase the need for public services. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. New school facilities have been or will be built with automatic security systems, fire alarms, smoke alarms, heat sensors, and sprinkler systems. 16. Utilities: , a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. Electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, and sanitary sewer utilities are available at the known sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan. The types of utilities available at specific project sites have been or will be addressed in more detail during project-level environmental review when appropriate. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Utility revisions and construction needs have been or will be identified during project- level environmental review when appropriate. 20 C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: IF Date Submitted: 21 D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? To the extent the Capital Facilities Plan makes it more likely that school facilities, including new high school, middle school and elementary school capacity, will be constructed, some of these environmental impacts will be more likely. Additional impermeable surfaces, such as roofs, access roads, and sidewalks could increase stormwater runoff, which could enter surface or ground waters. Heating systems, emergency generators, and other school equipment that is installed pursuant to the Capital Facilities Plan could result in air emissions. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan should not require the production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances, with the possible exception of the storage of diesel fuel or , gasoline for emergency generating equipment. The District does not anticipate a significant increase in the production of noise from its facilities, although the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will increase the District's student capacities. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Proposed measures to mitigate any such increases described above have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Stormwater detention and runoff will meet applicable County and/or City requirements and may be subject to National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ("NPDES") permitting requirements. Discharges to air will meet applicable air pollution control requirements. Fuel oil will be stored in accordance with local and state requirements. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? The Capital Facilities Plan itself will have no impact on these elements of the environment. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may require clearing plants off of the project sites and a loss to animal habitat. These impacts have been or 22 will be addressed in more detail during project-level environmental review when ' appropriate The projects included in the Plan are not likely to generate significant impacts on fish or marine life. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: Specific measures to protect and conserve plants, animals, and fish cannot be identified at this time. Specific mitigation proposals will be identified, however, during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? The construction of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will require the consumption of energy. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be constructed in accordance with applicable energy efficiency standards. 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, ' historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? The Capital Facilities Plan and individual projects contained therein should have no impact on these resources. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: No specific measures are being proposed at this time. Appropriate measures would be proposed during project-specific review. Annual updates of this Plan will be coordinated with the Cities of Auburn, Algona, Kent, and Pacific, and King County as part of the Growth Management Act process, one of the purposes of which is to protect environmentally sensitive areas. To the extent the School District's facilities planning process is part of the overall Growth Management planning process, these resources are more likely to be protected. 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? The Capital Facilities Plan will not have any impact on land or shoreline use that is ' incompatible with existing comprehensive plans, land use codes, or shoreline tl 23 management plans. The District does not anticipate that the Capital Facilities Plan or the projects contained therein will directly affect land and shoreline uses in the area ' served by the District. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: No measures to avoid or reduce land use impacts resulting from the Capital Facilities Plan or the projects contained therein are proposed at this time. 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? , The construction projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may create temporary increases in the Distnct's need for public services and utilities. The new school facilities will increase the District's demands on transportation and utilities. These increases are not expected to be significant. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: No measures to reduce or respond to such demands are proposed at this time. 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. The Capital Facilities Plan will not conflict with any laws or requirements for the ' protection of the environment. 24 1 School Kent 'fold' 2oo9 — 2,0io 201 4 2015 i E I€ xta k New Panther Lake Elementary School open in Fall 2009 1 pent School District No. 415 provides educational service to ' Residents of Unincorporated ping County and Residents of the Cities of Kent, Covington, auburn, Renton Black Diamond, Maple Valley, and Seailac, Washington Apri[2oo9 i i MAW 4 Rent S Ch'991_ 01's-Irl-bl. Kent School District No 415 12033 SE 256th Street , Kent,Washington 98030-6643 (253) 373-7295 SIX - YEAR CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN , 2009 - 2010 - 2014 - 2015 ---------._I E I 3 l K��ITI �:faa�-ors BOARD of DIRECTORS ' Jim Berrlos BIII Boyce ' Sandra Collins Chris Davies Debbie Straus , ADMINISTRATION t Barbara Grohe, Ph.D. — Superintendent Fred H High — Assistant Superintendent for Business Services Mern Rieger, Ed.D —Assistant Superintendent, Learning & School Improvement Larry Miner— Assistant Superintendent for Human Resources ' John Knutson — Executive Director of Finance Janis Bechtel — Executive Director, School Improvement 7— 12 , Jeanette Ristau — Executive Director, School Improvement K — 6 David Staight — Executive Director, School Improvement K — 6 Becky Hanks — Executive Director, Community Connections Charles Lind — Executive Director, Labor Relations & Legal Services Laura Madeo — Executive Director of Instructional Services Thuan Nguyen — Chief Information Officer ' Kent School Distncl Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2009 ' K Adk His C e C t a 6 1911 4&' A KLNTII �;c uvc7�l SIX - YEAR CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2009 - 2010 - 2014 - 2015 ' April 2009 1 For information on the Plan, please call the Finance & Planning Department at (253) 373-7295 1 Capital Facilities Plan ' Contributing Staff Gwenn Escher-Derdowski Forecast& Planning Administrator Fred Long, Supervisor of Facilities & Construction ' Karla Wilkerson, Facilities Department Don Walkup, Supervisor of Transportation Department Kathy Foslord, Transportation Manager Maps by Jana Tucker, Printing Services Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2009 1 C'1 Kent- Sc 0, Six year Capital F"acifities Plan Table of Contents Section Page Number ' I Executive Summary 2 i � I I Six-Year Enrollment Projection & History 4 III District Standard of Service 9 , I V Inventory, Capacity & Maps of Existing Schools 12 , V Six-Year Planning and Construction Plan 15 V I Relocatable Classrooms 18 ' V I I Projected Classroom Capacity 19 ' V I I I Finance Plan, Cost Basis and Impact Fee Schedules 24 , I X Summary of Changes to Previous Plan 31 ' X Appendixes 32 , Kent School District Six-year Capital Facilities Plan April 2009 ' I Executive Summary ' This Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") has been prepared by the Kent School District (the "District") as the organization's facilities planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act, King County Code K C C 21 A 43 and Cities of Kent, Covington, Auburn, Renton, Black Diamond, Maple Valley, and SeaTac. This annual plan update was prepared using data available in the spring of 2009 for the 2008-2009 school year ' This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the Kent School District This Plan is not intended to be the sole planning document for all of the District's needs The District may prepare interim and periodic Long Range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board Policies, taking into account a longer or shorter time period, other factors and trends in the use of facilities, ' and other needs of the District as may be required Prior Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent School District have been adopted by ' Metropolitan King County Council and Cities of Kent, Covington, Auburn and Renton and included in the Capital Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction The first ordinance implementing impact fees for the ' unincorporated areas was effective September 15, 1993 In order for impact fees to be collected in the unincorporated areas of Kent School District, the Metropolitan King County Council must adopt this Plan and a fee-implementing ordinance for the District For impact fees to be collected in the incorporated portions of the District, the cities of Kent, Covington, Auburn and ' Renton must also adopt this Plan and their own school impact fee ordinances This Plan has also been submitted to cities of Black Diamond, Maple Valley, and SeaTac. ' This Capital Facilities Plan establishes a standard of service in order to ascertain current and future capacity While the State Superintendent of Public Instruction ' establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines do not account for local program needs in the District The Growth Management Act, ' King County and City codes and ordinances authorize the District to make adjustments to the standard of service based on specific needs for students of the District. This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. Program capacity is based on an average capacity and updated to reflect changes to special programs served in each building. Relocatables in the capacity calculation use the same standard of service as the permanent facilities. ' (continued) Kent School Distnct Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2009 Page 2 1 � 1 I Executive Summary (continued) , The capacity of each school in the District is calculated based on the District ' standard of service and the existing inventory, which includes some relocatable classrooms. The District's program capacity of permanent facilities reflects program changes and the reduction of class size to meet the requirements of ' Student Achievement Initiative 728. Relocatables provide additional transitional capacity until permanent facilities are completed. Kent School District is the fourth largest district in the state Enrollment is , electronically reported monthly to the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI) on Form P-223. Although funding apportionment is based on ' Annual Average Full Time Equivalent (AAFTE), Enrollment on October 1 is a widely recognized "snapshot in time" that is used to report the District's enrollment for the year 1 P-223 Headcount for October 1, 2008 was 26,831 P-223 FTE (Full Time Equivalent) enrollment was 25,827.82 (FTE reports Kindergarten at 5 and excludes , Early Childhood Education [ECE] and college-only Running Start students ) The actual number of individual students per the October 2008 full head count was 27,579. (Full Headcount reports all enrolled students at 1 0 Including Kindergarten, ECE and 1 college-only Running Start students ) The District's standard of service, enrollment history and protections, and use of , transitional facilities are reviewed in detail in various sections of this Plan The District plans to continue to satisfy concurrency requirements through the transitional use of relocatables 1 A financing plan is included in Section V I I I which demonstrates the District's ability to implement this Plan Pursuant to the requirements of the Growth 1 Management Act, this Plan will be updated annually with changes In the fee schedules adjusted accordingly. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2009 Page 3 ' I I Six - Year Enrollment Projection For capital facilities planning, growth projections are based on cohort survival and student yield from documented residential construction projected over the next six years (See Table 2) The student generation factor, as defined on the next page, is the basis for the growth projections from new developments ' King County births and the District's relational percentage average were used to determine the number of kindergartners entering the system. (see Table 1) 8.48% of 22,874 King County live births in 2004 is projected for 1,940 students expected in Kindergarten for October 1, 2009 Together with proportional growth from new construction, 8.48% of King County births is equivalent to the number of students projected to enter kindergarten in the district for the next six-year period (see Table 2) State Funded Full Day Kindergarten ("FDK") programs required a revision to the methodology for projecting Kindergarten at 1.0 FTE for qualifying schools. Schools with half-day Kindergarten programs and the optional Tuition-based ' FDK are projected at .50 FTE. (seeTabie2a) Early Childhood Education students (sometimes identified as "Preschool Special ' Education [SE] or handicapped students") are forecast and reported separately, Capacity is reserved to serve the ECE programs at seven elementary schools. ' The first grade population is traditionally 7 - 8% larger than the kindergarten population due to growth and transfers to the District from private kindergartens. Cohort survival method uses historical enrollment data to forecast the number of students projected for ' the following year. Near term projections assume some growth from new developments to be offset by ' current local economic conditions With notable exceptions, the expectation is that enrollment increases will occur District-wide in the long term. District projections are based on historical growth patterns combined with continuing development of projects in the pipeline dependent on market/growth conditions. The District will continue to track new development activity to determine impact to ' schools and monitor conditions to reflect adjustments in this assumption The six-year enrollment projection anticipates moderate enrollment growth from new development currently in some phase of planning or construction in the district. ' Information on new residential developments and the completion of these proposed developments in all jurisdictions may be considered in the District's future analysis of growth projections. Within practical limits, the District has kept abreast of proposed developments The Kent School District serves seven permitting jurisdictions unincorporated King County, the cities of Kent, Covington, and Auburn and smaller portions of the cities of Renton, SeaTac, and Maple Valley The west Lake Sawyer area of Kent School District is in the city of Black Diamond. (Continued) Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2009 Page 4 I I Six -Year Enrollment Projection (Continued) , STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR e "Student Factor" is defined by King County code as "the number derived by a , school district to describe how many students of each grade span are expected to be generated by a dwelling unit" based on district records of average actual student generated rates for developments completed within the last five years. Following these guidelines, the student generation rate for Kent School District is as follows- Single Family Elementary .445 Middle School .118 , Senior High 245 Total .808 Multi-Family Elementary .296 Middle School 075 ' Senior High .111 Total .482 The student generation factor is based on a survey of 1,878 single family dwelling units and 1,283 multi-family dwelling units with no adjustment for occupancy rates Please refer to Appendix E on Page 36 of the Capital Facilities Plan for details of the Student Generation Factor survey , The actual number of students in those residential developments was determined using the District's Education Logistics (EDULOG) Transportation ' System. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2009 Page 5 8[04 r o r1 m 0 o c0 o Q M M In io x a0 0 NV b 06 m h��p N r a0 t0 a0 Q 0 Q N (+1 m N N V M (OV N N N N N N N 00 r N m g o (0 t0 r M CNTMO Q N r d.N m m NNON CO LQ N NO N O O O N N O O N n 00 LON 07 0 01 O O O r N N N N <O m N � N N N N N N N N N N @ E m Q o r N E o o O oO e_ aa OD r �Np < O O M n t°f Ol 0) w c 2 c $ p < NITT N O O N N Vco m vOi ¢ Y N j m N N N N N N N ' � MN a 9c LL «m [L03 M cc aml C W T O) O O N N 1' Of E O O J N N co r N N N N N N N N a v m m w M O 9 m m L S O N Il) O ^ � O O N N M M (OV V Q w N mC r m N N co N N N N N N N N r a E y v Q m ON o M N t0 1n �a(pp0 as O QI ♦ Of M l0 j v E r LL j c p IO n cop OMi o O eQ- - M O Q O coN V M m o m n N u N 1 m N N r N N N N V N N N N p n y z a 0 C m U) n o co M M n co Ic1 0 `f v rn w �' Z op h S a coo IDo N N o m a $ $ L N E ' W m N N 07 r N N N Na (V N N N r .- N �p �` a' d " G 0` d T ILI J rn 0 �` M o O W N W U] (O m M t0 M O N N q « umb C « P T N O O O O N O N O N ar- N N A p 01 p C 0 r aI m N N Oj N N N N N N N N N N r N (O m a H m p ' 0 Z m Y u) O m Z W w(„� �•+ m r N r v mmo m o r �1 N N N N N N N N N J N O J 8 U w W J(f) ? JmC N w N N O O ON VO O.-- O MO Ol O] I O .U7 NNO NN m (0 C14 � N N N N WHm xma W L8pO rd Q ti O N N eD M tO N O n r O O __ rn r m co o o 0 0 o rn rn rn mn'_ m g o m o '� o w m r•I N co N N N N N N r uj n m m L C LL m c C.) m O O � n IN N (OD 000 N M N (MO 1O a0 0) 01 ^ O m a ' N C �- O O r ^_ r a0 O? OR O (O Q IO C L .. Z W m t r N 00 O N N r M e m Y 0 W Y W !- N a Y U. QI Oc (v1 n 10 N O) N aa 01 O O M N Ot ' C c xBX C O O O O m O O1 Of O ' N m r• N 00 r N .- N .- r r r r -7 .- •- M 10 V J `� OI v C N m 10 >, m OJO Q. m �• '" h' 0 1� r N N (m t0 coN O N eD `� N m = bU YQl I� lO C] (O OI N O N t(I >. C b m wWn m m 0 j N N �} N O1 m O1 N W 61 j 2 W J r N N v_1 O li m Q M c e N ti co N C1 1� N O) (O 00 m O) N a O Q cy Ol M O Cn O1 O1 M Q $ N 10 E m m b J h O m , N m O N N 0 W V] M N M O E y ti N N OO o M, O II W A r• Nv IVn N m o O rO If) Na Q M O O' L cp omc Ld l cO !O m N - - r 0 m vpU= 0.p mc N N ! c ZE D N In Q (O O U] M O m N O O In r a7 V O N « [ryNV LL ' c QI W 0) l r r Octr CO r r r ( W O N ` q m Q V N 01 01 CO QI c0 M r (O 10 Q Q N m _ O b O� - d li J Cr m [ m JD t") mp N e (D N M 7 m N m ? N M 00 O N to Q v m .- m IIOaD N aNM m Hc Cc m coQo w Y (O ( M m m a o m oo - rr m N Uro} N m m m m w 4 m T > > r c x m L L L U w m « co ry C Lrn '4 N LL O O J w m m C m k v1 c II CO E �2 _ E n Iq g tgV� LL C OI 7 r N CO -ItU) to n a0 O1 at O .�- C o w m .2 = c N (aantt c m cn o Dm w ` o ` UE 0) (7 0 CD (7 u Y N ly Q KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 SIX -YEAR F T E ENROLLMENT PROJECTION State Funded FDK at 14 schools LB in 2003 LB in 2004 LB in 2005 LB in 2006 LB in 2007 LB est 08 LB est 08 ncTUAL P R O J E C T 1 0 N October 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 , King County Live Births 22,431 22,874 22,680 24,244 24,899 25,000 25,100 ' increase Decrease 568 443 -194 1,564 655 101 100 ' Kindergarten /Birth % 2 848% 848% 848% 848% 848% 848% 848% 2" Kindergarten FTE @ 5 768 479 471 537 565 569 573 2" FD Kindergarten @ 1.0 365 982 982 982 982 982 982 Grade 1 1,920 2,021 2,081 2,054 2,183 2,232 2,230 ' Grade 2 1,916 1,961 2,083 2,145 2,117 2,249 2,299 Grade 3 2,081 1,971 1,989 2,122 2,184 2,156 2,289 Grade 4 2,060 2,073 2,001 2,029 2,163 2,226 2,198 , Grade 5 2,044 2,065 2,085 2,023 2,051 2,185 2,248 Grade 6 2,081 2,091 2,110 2,140 2,077 2,106 2,242 , Grade 7 2,117 2,096 2,111 2,130 2,160 2,097 2,126 Grade 8 2,143 2,131 2,129 2,144 2,163 2,193 2,130 ' Grade 9 2,573 2,497 2,507 2,505 2,522 2,544 2,579 Grade 10 2,245 2,249 2,210 2,219 2,227 2,232 2,251 , Grade 11 1,966 1,841 1,889 1,857 1,864 1,871 1,875 Grade 12 1,549 1,661 1,662 1,705 1,676 1,683 1,689 , Total FTE Enrollment 25,828 26,118 26,310 26,592 26,934 27,325 27,711 Note 2,3l4 , Yearly Increase 83 290 192 282 342 391 386 Yearly increaselDecrease% 0 32% 1.12% 0.74% 1 07% 1.29% 1.45% 1 41% , Cumulative Increase 83 373 565 847 1,189 1,580 1,966 Full Time Equivalent FTE 25,828 1 26,118 1 26,310 1 26,592 1 26,934 27,325 1 27,711 1 Kindergarten enrollment projection is based on KSD percentage of live births in King County five years previous 2 Kindergarten FTE projection is calculated by using the District's previous year percentage of King County births , 5 years earlier compared to actual kindergarten enrollment in the previous year (Excludes ECE-Early Childhood Education) 3 Kindergarten projection is at 1 0 FTE for 14 schools qualifying for Grant&State Apportionment Funded Full Day Kindergarten(FDK) ' Schools with 1/2 Day Kindergarten and Optional Tuition-based Full Day Kindergarten programs are projected at 5 FTE 4 Oct 2008 P223 FTE is 25.B28&Headcount is 26,831 Full student count with ECE Preschool&Running Start=27,579 G R O W T H P R O J E C T I O N S - Adjustments for current economic factors , For facilities planning purposes, this six-year enrollment projection anticipates moderate enrollment , growth from new development currently in some phase of planning or construction in the district Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 2 April 2009 Page 7 ' w 4g 0 a O O � m� w 2 E 2 2 z (L M M MU Mm MU cr3 w = ui rn I- m (N� LO M M w a N C N O 0 1 � LIJ ° N p E a J LL ° d tV N C C � T 9 � i a C _ O �N�QQ �' a O a 1~L �j O u°i T tr+I M N m C Y p m ro N LL N m N N ❑ � o � o p w m o m u pp a w N M co] t+1 tN'1 of M N CtO') ry Of E a LL O O ❑ ` C N O F N O Z 0 � p a c ! c W W U p J O� ❑ Ilf tp N 2 0 O O a C In p LL o c > a O Y N N L a - Y ❑ v Z W Wien ❑ N Z F' LL N 0 D LL O N tOD LL y W 15 ❑ N Q rW N D m pmp ��pp C N O Z `� d O ❑ GoLL T b Of N O N 47 O Y O LL O LL O IC O C a Y ai 0 w E c c Y c Z x O N $ LL 1 WU U. aN � Y fA ¢ t E 0 F- > N d c O L" Q N C N N N tD C C 00 O t0 N V N T V C C R CO O (O O N V C �O N a N = LL W W N O W t[I O O O N N u1 O Q� O N 1� N Q� V OD N O O (O O 01 O C a v v v a a �n v v v v �n M V �n a `� to V V M a 0 �n �n V' V M �n m M a p o W •- 0 0 O a a E m m d C � m U > O 3 x a w x w w U w > v> m w w o w O c Q Q U U U U W W LL ❑ C7 C7 2 Y z d a. a cr vj M M M M N Z Y 0- 0 O C LL N LL C A V N E E aci m E Q o f cc O ❑ cy t0 E c E E E F cEy QJ U sU41 YCO NA mw ° o E c a m Ec ❑yOhCxF- w EE w m ' cN c E 2 o mo m z m m m w E c c Emc 0> m o M > E Ca _ LW Nw W W U U W m 0 Q o F o $ mw > op = 2 COCo O OCn CC NW > N N = w c N O W M m o U E o = o CE m ° o n JUUU w wC 0 (� x z a- om L M M MM M -6 °m u z° z M c Y III Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" In order to determine the capacity of facilities in a school district, King County ' Code 21A.06 references a "standard of service" that each school district must establish in order to ascertain Its overall capacity The standard of service identifies the program year, the class size, the number of classrooms, students ' and programs of special need, and other factors determined by the district which would best serve the student population This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. , The District has Identified schools with significant special needs programs as "Impact" schools and the standard of service targets a lower class size at those ' facilities Relocatables Included in the capacity calculation use the same standard of service as the permanent facilities. (See Appendix A, e & C) The standard of service defined herein may continue to change in the future. Kent School District is continuing a long-term strategic planning process combined with review of changes to capacity and standard of service adjustments to meet the requirements of Student Achievement Initiative 728 This process will affect various aspects of the District's "standard of service" and future changes will be reflected in future capital facilities plans. Because the , funding for Initiative 728 is incremental, implementation of the Initiative is also incremental and may result in changes to school capacity Current Standards of Service for Elementary Students , Class size for Kindergarten is planned for an average of 22 students. ' Class size for grades 1 - 4 is planned for an average of 23 students. Class size for grades 5 - 6 is planned for an average of 29 students ' Program capacity for general education elementary classrooms is calculated at an average of 24 students per classroom because of fluctuations between , primary and intermediate grade levels ((.e third/fourth or fourth/fifth grade split classes, etc.). Most elementary schools provide full day kindergarten programs (FDK or KAI — Full Day Kindergarten or Kindergarten Academic Intervention) with the second half of the day funded by grants or tuition Students have scheduled time in a computer lab Students may also be provided music instruction and physical education in a separate classroom or facility. Special Education for students with disabilities may be provided in a self- ' contained classroom with a capacity of 10-15 depending on the program. (continued) , Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2009 Page 9 ' III Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" (continued) ' Identified students will also be provided other educational opportunities in classrooms for programs such as those designated as follows. English Language Learners (E L L) Self-contained Special Education Support Center Programs (SC) Integrated Programs & Resource Rooms (for special remedial assistance) Early Childhood Education (ECE) (3-4 yr. old students with disabilities) School Adjustment (SA) Program for severely behavior-disordered students Speech & Language Therapy & Programs for Hearing Impaired students Adaptive Support Center for Mild, Moderate & Severe Disabilities (ASC-DD) Occupational & Physical Therapy Programs (OT1PT) Developmental Kindergarten in SC Programs Kindergarten Academic Intervention Program (KAI-Full Day Kindergarten) Education for Disadvantaged Students (Title I) — Federal Program Learning Assisted Programs (LAP) — State Program District Remediation Programs Education for Highly Capable Students (formerly "Gifted" Program) Some of the above special programs require specialized classroom space, as well as music and physical education classrooms, computer labs, etc ; thus, the permanent capacity of some of the buildings housing these programs is reduced. Some students, for example, leave their regular classroom for a short period of time to receive instruction in these special programs and "pull-out' space must ' be allocated to serve these programs Some newer buildings have been constructed to accommodate most of these programs, some older buildings have been modified, and in some circumstances, these modifications reduce the ' classroom capacity of the buildings. When programs change, program capacity is updated to reflect the change in program and capacity. Current Standards of Service for Secondary Students ' The standards of service outlined below reflect only those programs and educational opportunities provided to secondary students which directly affect the capacity of the school buildings Reductions have been made in 7th and 10ih grade English classes for Initiative 728 These standards are subject to change pending annual updates based on staff and public review for changes funded by Student Achievement Initiative 728. Class size for grades 7 - 8 is planned for an average of 29 students. Class size for 7th & 101h grade English class is planned for an average of 25 students. Class size for grades 9 - 12 is planned for an average of 31 students Special Education for students with disabilities may be provided in a self- contained classroom with a capacity of 10-15 depending on the program. (cont'd ) Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2009 Page 10 III Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" (continued) , Identified secondary students will also be provided other educational , opportunities in classrooms for programs designated as follows: Computer, Multi-media &Technology Labs & Programs—(Nova Net-Advanced Academics) ' Technology Academy programs at Kent-Meridian High School & Mill Creek Middle School Science Programs & Labs — Biology, Chemistry, Physics, Oceanography, Astronomy, Meteorology, Marine Biology, General Science, etc , English Language Learners (E L L) Integrated Programs & Resource Rooms (for special remedial assistance) Basic Skills Programs ' Transition Outreach Program (TOP)for 18-21 year old Special Education students Child Development Preschool and Daycare Programs Music Programs— Band, Orchestra, Chorus, Jazz Band, etc ' Art Programs— Painting, Design, Drawing, Ceramics, Pottery, Photography, etc Theater Arts— Drama, Stage Tech, etc Journalism and Yearbook Classes Highly Capable (Honors or Gifted) and Advanced Placement Programs , International Baccalaureate ("I B") Program Kent Phoenix Academy—Performance Learning Center, Gateway, Virtual High School & Kent Success program with evening classes designed for credit retrieval Traffic Safety Education JROTC - Junior Reserve Officers Training Corps Variety of Career&Technical Education Programs (CTE-Vocational Education) ' Family& Consumer Science—Culinary Arts, Sewing, Careers w/Children/Educ , etc Health & Human Services— Sports Medicine, Sign Language, Cosmetology, etc Business Education —Word Processing, Accounting, Business Law& Math, DECA, FBLA(Future Business Leaders), Sales & Marketing, Economics, Web Design Technical & Industry — Woodworking, Cabinet Making, Budding Trades, Metals, Automotive & Manufacturing Technology, Welding, Machine Shop, Drafting, Drawing, CAD (Computer-aided Design), Electronics, Engineering & Design, Aviation, etc Graphic &Commercial Arts, Media, Photography, Theater &Stage, Ag & Horticulture Many of these programs and others require specialized classroom space which , can reduce the permanent capacity of the school buildings In addition, alternative home school assistance, choice and transition programs are provided for students in grades 3 - 12 at Kent Mountain View Academy. , Space or Classroom Utilization As a result of scheduling conflicts for student programs, the need for specialized rooms for certain programs, and the need for teachers to have a work space during their planning periods, it is not possible to achieve 100% utilization of , regular teaching stations at secondary schools Based on the analysis of actual utilization of classrooms, the District has determined that the standard utilization rate is 85% for secondary schools. Program capacity at elementary schools reflects 100% utilization at the elementary level with adjustments for pull-out programs served in relocatables In the future, the District will continue close analysis of actual utilization. ' Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2009 Page 11 i 11 I V Inventory and Capacity of Existing Schools 1 Currently, the District has permanent program capacity to house 27,321 students and transitional (relocatable) capacity to house 1 ,552 This capacity is based on the District's Standard of Service as set forth in Section I I I Included in this Plan is an inventory of the District's schools by type, address and current capacity. (See Table 3 on Page 13) The ratio between permanent capacity and transitional capacity has changed ' from 96 - 4% to 97 - 3% since the previous Plan The program capacity is periodically updated for changes in programs, additional classrooms and new schools. Program capacity has been updated in this Plan to reflect program changes and new capacity for building additions at the high schools. Program capacity also reflects adjustments for the Student Achievement Initiative 728 reduction in class size. The class size reduction received voter approval in the Educational Programs and Operations Levy as well as through funding for Student Achievement Initiative 728 The District will conduct annual public review and update class size recommendations in accordance with the requirements and Incremental funding of Student Achievement Initiative 728. Kent Mountain View Academy (formerly Kent Learning Center and Grandview ' Elementary) serves Grades 3 — 12 with transition, choice and home school assistance programs It is located in the former Grandview School in the western part of the District in the city of SeaTac This school was originally designed as ' an elementary school and Is Included in the elementary capacity for this Plan. Kent Phoenix Academy is a non-traditional high school which opened in Fall 2007 in the renovated site and building that formerly served Sequoia Middle School KPA has four special programs Including the Performance Learning Center, Gateway, Virtual High School and Kent Success Kent Success replaced the former Night Academy at Kent-Meridian High School and provides afternoon and evening classes for credit retrieval. Calculation of Elementary, Middle School and Senior High School capacities are set forth in Appendices A, B and C A map of existing schools is included on Page 14. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2009 Page 12 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No 415 INVENTORY and CAPACITY of EXISTING SCHOOLS 2008-2009 Year I SCHOOL Opened AB R ADDRESS Program Capacity' Carriage Crest Elementary 1990 CC 18235-140th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 452 Cedar Valley Elementary 1971 CV 26500 Timberlane Way SE, Covington 98042 402 Covington Elementary 1961 CO 17070 SE Wax Road, Covington 98042 498 Crestwood Elementary 1980 CW 25225-1801h Avenue SE, Covington 98042 456 East Hill Elementary 1953 EH 9825 S 240th Street, Kent 98031 464 Emerald Park 1999 EP 11800 SE 216th Street, Kent 98031 504 Fanwood Elementary 1969 FW 16600-148th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 408 George T Daniel Elementary 1992 DE 11310 SE 248th Street, Kent 98030 450 Glenridge Elementary 1996 GR 19405-120th Avenue SE,Renton 98058 456 Grass Lake Elementary 1971 GL 26700-191st Place SE, Kent 98042 452 Horizon Elementary 1990 HE 27641 -144th Avenue SE, Kent 98042 504 Jenkins Creek Elementary 1987 JC 26915-186th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 398 Kent Elementary 1999 KE 24700-64th Avenue South, Kent 98032 464 Lake Youngs Elementary 1965 LY 19660-142nd Avenue SE, Kent 96042 524 Martin SDrtun Elementary 1987 MS 12711 SE 248th Street, Kent 98030 474 Meadow Ridqe Elementary 1994 MR 27710-108th Avenue SE,Kent 98030 464 , Meridian Elementary 1939 ME 25621 -140th Avenue SE, Kent 98042 524 Millennium Elementary 2000 ML 11919 SE 270th Street, Kent 98030 498 Neely-O'Bnen Elementary 1990 NO 6300 South 236th Street, Kent 98032 440 , Panther Lake Elementary 1938 PL 20831 -108th Avenue SE. Kent 98031 396 Park Orchard Elementary 1963 PO 11010 SE 232nd Street, Kent 98031 480 Pine Tree Elementary 1967 PT 27825-118th Avenue SE, Kent 98030 522 Ridgewood Elementary 1987 RW 18030-162nd Place SE, Renton 98058 504 , Sawyer Woods Elementary 1994 SW 31135-228th Ave SE,Black Diamond 98010 504 Scenic Hill Elementary 1960 SH 26025 Woodland Way South, Kent 98030 464 Sods Creek Elementary 1971 SC 12651 SE 218th Place, Kent 98031 408 Springbrook Elementary 1969 SB 20035-100th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 398 Sunrise Elementary 1992 SR 22300-132nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042 504 Elementary TOTAL 13,012 , Cedar Heights Middle School 1993 CH 19640 SE 272 Street,Covington 98042 923 Mattson Middle School 1981 MA 16400 SE 251 st Street, Covington 98042 804 Meeker Middle School 1970 MK 12600 SE 192nd Street, Renton 98058 890 ' Meridian Middle School 1958 MM 23480-120th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 790 Mill Creek MS(former Kent Jr Hi)2 2005/1952 MC 620 North Central Avenue, Kent 98032 828 Northwood Middle School 1996 NW 17007 SE 184th Street, Renton 98058 972 ' Middle School TOTAL 5,207 Kent-Meridian Senior High School 1951 KM 10020 SE 256th Street, Kent 98030 1,772 , Kenllake Senior High School 1997 KL 21401 SE 300th Street,Kent 98042 2,157 Kentndge Senior High School 1968 KR 12430 SE 208th Street, Kent 98031 2,270 Kentwood Senior High School 1981 KW 25800-164th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 2,137 Senior High TOTAL 8,336 Kent Mountain View Academy s 1965 MVlLC 22420 Military Road, Des Moines 98198 416 Kent Phoenix Academy 4 1966 PH 11000 SE 264th Street, Kent 98030 350 , DISTRICT TOTAL 27,321 Changes to capacity reflect program changes and new building additions at high schools ' 2 Mill Creek Middle School and Technology Academy replaced renovated Kent Junior High in 2005 3 Kent Mountain View Academy serves grades 3-12 The school was formerly known as Kent Learning Center&Grandview Elementary Kent Phoenix Academy is a non-traditional high school which opened in Fall 2007 in the former Sequoia MS building Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 3 April 2009 Page 13 LO i o m� Z oV c m 0 v o - V c0)> � • N O ` o �, 000 ga Y mL YE O � a4 p .� m s �L o� w O oU } � A ° " a =" a) Y= 08--00 a s C 'o C o f c C U 00 • �° caw i 0t °m• 0 • u > p0 0E a " • Y N °o — mN U msT C� 0-0 u UW yva EP0 �p 00 L • 'O Q vU e Y ,cOm to vC H o ooL E ooE o�4-3� o od 3N wUw•z� > N -D EL • d 00 W o_ Y0)3� w 22• •x Fo NE• � � 3SeAV41179LrnEv d c &T Y �0 0° °g r,S, wo mrE N LLw Q JYW W NO r Cm •0 L o N h� C�` 3S OAV 440VL „• w y m E p W • o C N �> x N •w L 3S eAV PULL N xw 3S OAV PUZ£L Nc N� m$ aN 6 p 70 Oa • • y �` yU 0 cm Oy x 0E or Nc Q C UW a0 Em o= (D D 22 roE 0pm •-E c _m mE O ' > •�� Yx 9� Um 0� • cE �Jw EU o>•�� •aw g EE 0m• of o� tow 'a av O O O Ann a (9w mm u�iw OE • ¢ •moo v> -C C Q N 3S SAW 41801 E"' a w• Y Q 00 O co X > •Y -C } C `p 06 =�, • 3S eAV 4JV0 L ; U US -0�• Lm Nc•0 c8 • UE r1C` cU -C c� CN 'Emu �L Sf0 W O G °W a ' vmm dN uc LC U C C C EE w � cnYY m Ex 0ru 0000 -O 11Nr Y fD'T eAb'ID1JUe, O� ye, 9 iz Aiam46111 AeIIDA 1SOM • E • Eo C c V L m o= E s E m ey w c> mE 0�Q N ON ZW 0 U �qy Y ) • 4 eJbJSjeJul Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2009 Page 14 V Six-Year Planning and Construction Plan i At the time of preparation of this Plan in spring of 2009, the following projects are ' completed or in the planning phase in Kent School District: • Construction is in progress for additional classroom capacity at Kent-Meridian High School and has recently been completed at Kentlake High School • Sequoia Middle School was renovated and reconfigured to provide capacity for approximately 350 high school students at the non-traditional high school, Kent Phoenix Academy in 2007-08 • Kent Junior High was renovated and renamed Mill Creek Middle School Mill Creek MS also serves the Kent Technology Academy program for students in Grades 7-8 The construction of Phase I I of the renovation of Mill Creek MS is in progress • In February 2006, voters approved construction funding for replacement of Panther Lake ' Elementary School and a future Elementary School to accommodate new growth A new site was acquired and construction is in progress for replacement of Panther Lake , Elementary The new Panther Lake will open to replace the current school in Fall 2009 • Planning is in progress for a replacement school for Covington Elementary School. • Enrollment projections reflect future need for additional capacity at the elementary school , level Future facility and site needs are reflected in this Plan • Some funding is secured for purchase of additional portables and some funding may be ' provided by impact fees as needed Sites are based on need for additional capacity As a critical component of capital facilities planning, county and city planners and , decision-makers are encouraged to consider safe walking conditions for all students when reviewing applications and design plans for new roads and developments This should include sidewalks for pedestrian safety as well as bus pull-outs and turn-arounds for school buses. I Included in this Plan is an inventory of potential projects and sites identified by the ' District which are potentially acceptable site alternatives in the future (See Table 4 on Page 16 & Site map on Page 17) Voter approved bond issues have included funding for the purchase of sites for some of ' these and future schools, and the sites acquired to date are included In this Plan Some funding is secured for purchase of additional sites but some may be funded with impact fees as needed Not all undeveloped properties meet current school construction requirements and some property may be traded or sold to meet future facility needs 2006 voter approval of $106M bond issue for capital improvement included the construction funding for a new elementary school, replacement of Panther Lake Elementary, and classroom additions to high schools Some impact fees will also be applied to those projects Student Achievement Initiative 728 funds are being utilized to reduce class size and provide extended learning opportunities Based on community input at public hearings, the Board will continue annual review of standard of service and those decisions will be reflected in the each update of the Capital Facilities Plan. ' Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2009 Page 15 S IKENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.415 Site Acquisitions and Projects Planned to Provide Additional Capacity Protected Protected V for ' SCHOOL ! FACILITY / SITE LOCATION T pe Status Completion Program new Date Capaaty Growth Appronanate I Appiwimate I ion Map ELEMENTARY (Numbers assigned to future schools may not correlate with number of existing schools) 13 Replacement for Panther Lake Elementary (F) SE 216th Street&102nd Ave SE Replacement Consiruction Fall 2009 500 21% PL Elementary Site (F) SE 216th Street&102nd Ave SE Site 2009 21% Panther Lake Elementary-Replaced in 2009 SE 208 Street&108th Ave SE Replacement Planning 2009 -396 5 Replacement for Covington Elementary (U) SE 256th Street& 154th Ave SE Replacement Planning 2011 600 20% Covington Elem-Replacement planned for 2011 17070 SE Wax Road, Covington Replacement Planning 2011 -498 Elementary#31 (Actual#29) (F) To be determined 2 New Planning 2012-13 600 100% Site for Elementary#31 (Unfunded)1 To be determined 2 Site Planning 2012-13 100% MIDDLE SCHOOL Mill Creek Middle School 620 N Central Avenue,Kent Renovation consl ign 2009 828 N/A Phase If of Renovation ,n progress Sequoia Middle School Renovation&Reconfiguration Renovation Planning 2007 -771 WA for Kent Phoenix Academy SENIOR HIGH New Non-traditional High School Former Sequoia Middle School Kent Phoenix Academy (Funded) 11000 SE 264th Street,Kent Renovation Utilized 2007-08 350 100% Classroom additions at Kentlake High School (F) 21401 SE 300th Street,Kent Additions Utilized 2008 171 100% Classroom additions at Kent-Meridian HS (F) 10020 SE 256th Street,Kent Additions in progress 2009 79 100% ' Additional TEMPORARY FACILITIES I Capacity Relocatables For placement as needed New Planning 2008+ 24-71 each 100% SUPPORT FACILITIES Bus Facility (Unfunded)' Near Kent-Meridian High School New Planning TBD' N/A #on Land Use Map 9 OTHER SITES ACQUIRED Type I Jurisdiction 4 Covington area North (Near Mattson MS) SE 251 &164 SE, Covington 98042 Elementary City of Covington 7 Covington area South (Scarsella) SE 290&156 SE, Kent 98042 Elementary King County 5 Covington area West (Halleson-Wikstrom) SE 256&154 SE, Covington 98042 Elementary City of Covington 3 Ham Lake area (Pollard) 16820 SE 240, Kent 98042 Elementary King County 8 SE of Lake Morton area (West property) SE 332&204 SE, Kent 98042 Secondary King County ' 2 Shady Lk area(Sowers,Blaine,Drahota,Parohne) 17426 SE 192 Street, Renton 98068 Elementary King County 1 So King Co Activity Center(Nike site) SE 167& 170 SE, Renton 98058 TBD' King County 12 South Central site (Plemmons-Yeh-Wms) SE 286th Street&124th Ave SE,Kent TBD' King County ' Notes ' Unfunded facility needs will be reviewed in the future a TBD-To be determ,ned-Some sites are acquired but placement, timing and/or configuration have not been determined s Numbers correspond to sites on Site Bank Map on Page 17 Other site locations are parcels identified in Table 7 on Page 27 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 4 April 2009 Page 16 � y O Z 0 m m ae ' .� h V � Y Cri� catw Q > O� /1� O ` 0 3 E �n ©0 3 m V OL =N C Y 2 •♦ O AFFRR C �n °� o >a• • Y L9� '�s cT of c _m ma UO m� L � QiUm OIC O °� � p X� 3N Uw °`o �- 0 qd Fro m� °og m � �= o`d �� L� o L 3S anV 4179E Q6'� �� 00� Z, > � `^> w m oO C0 N p L� 3m� om °o ° ti LLm Ym w °: a 3S eny 4107E m� o �i uViy w U� yr •w N Zw V 6p� mu' y 2- 3S anV PuUL n- c- 3S anV Pule o` m o Co �- mo �_ mw 67 mE m f=N D r O t E r m � yZ'v u, � CAN 0�L 3w cr aw •aE 3` p� �� f cT 3E - _m °u• °° N Z ¢ o � � �w �_� Om °m w Ew yE• N yE �a� �L ' 3S anV W?OI 06 yy N _ago 3Sa^V 4170E � O L- CU 0 -E ✓)0�-y aC wNa-, J� vwi Wm _ N �fl • anV lu4uez) N P ysti Z N Aom46if 4a)IgA 1saM �• q)T m° mO YC TO E ,y11 m mm N > z'w w oc °a x>< 9 aJois�d�ul Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2009 Page 1 V I Relocatable Classrooms ' For the purpose of clarification, the term "portables" and the more descriptively accurate term, "relocatables" are used interchangeably in this Plan. The Plan also references use of portables or relocatables as Interim or transitional capacity/facilities. Currently, the District utilizes 128 relocatables to house students in excess of permanent capacity, for program purposes at school locations, and several for storage or other purposes (See Appendices A B C D) Based on enrollment projections, Implementation of additional full day kindergarten programs, program capacity and the need for additional permanent capacity, the District anticipates the need to purchase some additional relocatables during the next six-year period. The continually escalating cost of moving relocatables will increasingly limit the choice between building new relocatables on site and relocating older ones. ' During the time period covered by this Plan, the District does not anticipate that all of the District's relocatables will be replaced by permanent facilities. During the useful life of some of the relocatables, the school-age population may decline in some communities and Increase in others, and these relocatables provide the flexibility to accommodate the immediate needs of the community. ' Portables, or relocatables, may be used as Interim or transitional facilities: 1, To prevent overbuilding or overcrowding of permanent school 1 facilities. 2 To cover the gap between the time of demand for increased capacity and completion of permanent school facilities to meet that demand. 3. To meet unique program requirements. Relocatables currently in use are continually evaluated resulting in some being improved and some replaced. Quality concerns will be among those addressed by the next Community Facilities Planning Committee for review of capital facilities needs for the next bond issue. iThe Plan projects that the District will use relocatables to accommodate interim housing needs for the next six years and beyond. The use of relocatables, their impacts on permanent facilities, life cycle and operational costs, and the interrelationship between relocatables, emerging technologies and educational restructuring will continue to be examined. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2009 Page 18 V I I Projected Six-Year Classroom Capacity As stated in Section I V, the program capacity study is periodically updated for changes in special programs and reflects class size fluctuations in Grades K - 4. As shown in the Inventory and Capacity chart in Table 3 on Page 13, the ' program capacity is also reflected in the capacity and enrollment comparison charts. (See Tables 5&5 A-B-C on pages 20-23) Enrollment is electronically reported to OSPI on Form P-223 on a monthly basis ' and funding apportionment is based on Annual Average FTE (AAFTE). The first school day of October is widely recognized as the enrollment "snapshot in time" to report enrollment for the year Full Time Equivalent (FTE) student enrollment for October 2008 was 25,827.82. Kindergarten students are reported at 5 although many schools provide full day kindergarten ("FDK") with alternative funding for the second half of the day State-funded Full Day Kindergarten programs will report and protect some Kindergarten students at 1 00 FTE at qualifying FDK schools P-223 FTE excludes Early Childhood Education (preschool) students and College-only Running Start students (See Tables 5&SA-B-Con pages 20-23) , In October there were 679 students in 11" and 12t" grade participating in the Running Start program at 10-20 different colleges and receiving credits toward both high school and college graduation 334 of these students attended classes only at the college ("college-only") and are excluded from FTE and headcount for capacity and enrollment comparisons. ' Kent School District continues to be the fourth largest district in the state of Washington. P-223 Headcount for October 2008 was 26,831 with kindergarten students counted at 1 0 and excluding ECE and college-only Running Start students. A full headcount of all students enrolled in October 2008 totals 27,579 which includes ECE and college-only Running Start students. Based on the enrollment forecasts, current inventory and capacity, current standard of service, relocatable capacity, and future planned additional classroom space, the District anticipates having sufficient capacity to house students over the next six years. (See Table 5 and Tables 5 A-B-C on Pages 20-23) This does not mean that some schools will not experience overcrowding. There may be significant need for additional portables and/or new schools to accommodate growth within the District and class size reduction mandated I under Student Achievement Initiative 728 Some schools, by design, may be opened with relocatables on site Boundary changes, limited and costly movement of relocatables, zoning changes, market conditions, and educational restructuring will all play a major role in addressing overcrowding and underutilization of facilities in different parts of the District. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2009 Page 19 i t KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY TOTAL DISTRICT SCHOOL YEAR 2008-2009 2009-2010 1 2010-2011 2011-2012 1 2012-2013 2013-2014 1 2014-2015 Actual P R O J E C T E D Permanent Program Capacity ' 27,150 27,321 27,504 27,504 27,606 28,206 28,206 Changes to Permanent Capacity ' Classroom additions at Kentlake HS (F) 171 Classroom additions at Kent-Mendlan HS (F) 79 Mill Creek MS Renovation-No new Capacity 2 Replacement schools with protected increase In capacity Panther Lake Elementary 3 (Funded) 500 To Replace current school capacity -396 Covington Elementary 3 (Unfunded) 600 To Replace current school capacity -498 New Elementary#31 (Funded) 600 Permanent Program Capacity Subtotal 27,321 27,504 27,504 27,606 28,206 28,206 28,206 Interim Relocatable Capacity Elementary Reocatable Capacity Required 0 120 288 408 96 480 840 Middle School Relocatable Capacrty Required 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Senior High Relocatable Capacity Required 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Relocatable Capacity Required'&6 0 120 288 408 96 480 840 ' TOTAL CAPACITY ' 27,321 1 27,624 27,792 28,014 28,302 2$686 2 1 046 TOTAL FTE ENROLLMENT!PROJECTION 5 25,82 226,118 26,310 26,592 26,934 27,325 27,711 DISTRICT AVAILABLE CAPACITY 1,493 1,506 1,482 1,422 1,368 1,361 1,335 ' Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and updated periodically to reflect program changes 2 Phase I I of renovation continues for Mill Creek Middle School& Kent Technology Academy (No new capacity added ) 3 Replacement schools for Panther Lake& Covington Elementary will be built on new sites with increased capacity 4 in Fall 2004, 9th grade moved to the high schools which increased capacity available at Middle School 7-8 grade levels 5 F7E=Full Time Equivalent Enrollment)Protections (i a 112 day Kindergarten student= 5&Full Day Kindergarten student=1 0 FTE) 6 2003-2009 total classroom relocatable capacity is 1,552 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 April 2009 Page 20 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY SENIOR HIGH - Grades 9 - 12 SCHOOL YEAR 2008-2009 2009-2010 1 2010-2011 2011-2012 1 2012-2013 2013-2014 1 2014-2015 Actual P R O J E C T E D t 8 765 8 765 8,765 8 Senior High permanent Capacity 8,515 8,686 765 8,765, Includes Kent Phoenix Academy 2 Chan es to High School Ca aclt Classroom additions at Kentlake HS (F) 171 Classroom additions at Kent-Meridian HS 79 and KM Technology Academy 3 (F) Subtotal 8,686 8,765 8,765 8,765 8,765 8,765 8,765 Relocatable Capacity Required ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL CAPACITY 1 8,686 8,765 8,765 8,765 8,765 8,765 8,765 FTE ENROLLMENT/PROJECTION 4 8,333 8,248 8,268 8,286 8,289 8,330 8,394 , SURPLUS (DEFICIT)CAPACITY 353 517 497 479 476 435 371 Number of Relocatables Required 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No Classroom Relocatables required at this time Some Relocatables used for classroom and program purposes , Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 Sequoia Middle School was renovated and reconfigured as a new non-traditional high school, and re-opened in Fall 2007 as Kent Phoenix Academy serving grades 9- 12 with four special programs. 3 KM added a new high school Technology Academy program in 2007 serving students in grades 9- 10 in 2008-09 4 FTE=Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment or projections, excluding College-only Running Start students. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 A April 2009 Page 21 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY MIDDLE SCHOOL - Grades 7 - 8 SCHOOL YEAR 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 1 2014-2015 Actual P R O J E C T E D � l Middle School Permanent Capacity ' 5,207 5,207 5,207 5,207 5,207 5,207 5,207 Chan es to Middle School Capeci a Mill Creek MS&Kent Technology Academy are open during Phase 2 of Renovation (No new capacity added in renovation) Subtotal 5,207 5,207 5,207 5,207 5,207 5,207 5,207 Relocatable Capacity Required ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL CAPACITY 18,3 5,207 5,207 5,207 5,207 5,207 5,207 5,207 LFTE ENROLLMENT/PROJECTION 2 4,260 4,227 4,240 4,274 4,323 4,290 4,256 SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY ' 947 980 967 933 884 917 951 No Classroom Relocatables required at middle sc,)ools at this time Some Relocatables used for classroom and program purposes 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 FTE =Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment or Projections 1 3 Grade level reconfiguration -All 9th grade students moved to the high schools in Fall 2004 MIII Creek Middle School & Technology Academy- Kent Junior High was renovated and re-opened in Fall 2005 with a Technology Academy serving 7th & 8th grade students from all service areas Phase I I of MIII Creek renovation continues in 2008-09 and the school is open during construction. 5 Middle School capacity meets concurrency requirements and no impact fees are collected for middle schools Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 B April 2009 Page 22 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY ELEMENTARY - Grades K - 6 � I SCHOOL YEAR 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-201z 2012-2013 2013-2014 1 2014-2015 Actual P R O 1 E C T E D Elementary Permanent Capacity' 13,012 13,428 13,532 13,532 13,634 14,234 14,234 Kent Mountain View Academy 2 416 Changes to Elementary Capacity Replacement schools with projected increase in capacity Panther Lake Elementary° (Funded) 500 Replaces current school capacity -396 Covington Elementary (unfunded) 600 Replaces current Covington Elem,capacity -498 New Elementary#31 (Funded)5 600 Subtotal 13,428 13,532 13,532 13,634 14,234 14,234 14,234 Relocatable Capacity Required' 0 120 288 408 96 480 840 TOTAL CAPACITY 2 13,428 13,652 13,820 14,042 14,330 14.714 15,074 11II FTE ENROLLMENT/PROJECTION s 13,235 13,643 13,802 14,032 14,322 14,705 15,061 SURPLUS(DEFICIT) CAPACITY 193 9 18 10 8 9 13 Number of Relocatables Required 0 5 13 17 4 20 35 35 Classroom Relocatables required in 2014-15 Some additional Relocatables used for program purposes t Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes 2 Kent Mountain View Academy is a special program at the former Grandview School serving students In Grades 3-12. The school building(formerly Kent Learning Center&Grandview Elem )was designed as an elementary school a FTE=Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment or Projections (Kindergarten @ 5 or 1 0&excluding ECE) Kindergarten projection is at 5 FTE for Half Day Kindergarten programs or optional Tuition-based Full Day Kindergarten Kindergarten projection is at 1 0 FTE for Full Day Kindergarten programs funded by state apportionment or grants 4 Replacement schools for Panther Lake&Covington Elementary will be built on new sites with increased capacity 5 Site selection and construction timing for Elementary#31 Is pending review of location and capacity needs Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 C April 2009 Page 23 V I I I Finance Plan The finance plan shown on Table 6 demonstrates how the Kent School District plans to finance Improvements for the years 2009 - 2010 through 2014 - 2015. The financing components include secured and unsecured funding and impact fees The plan is based on voter approval of future bond Issues, collection of impact fees under the State Growth Management Act and voluntary mitigation fees paid pursuant to State Environmental Policy Act. Voters approved a $69.5 million bond issue for Capital Construction and Improvements in February 2002. The bond issue partially funded building 1 additions at three high schools which coincided with moving 9th grade students from junior high to senior high schools in September 2004. The District received some District Equalization funds (formerly known as "state matching funds") and has utilized impact fees for the senior high additions. In February 2006, voters approved a $106 million bond issue for replacement of Panther Lake Elementary School with increased capacity, as well as construction of a new elementary school to accommodate growth The new Panther Lake Elementary School is under construction and will be open in Fall 2009. The bond issue also funded Phase II of the renovation for Mill Creek Middle School and renovation of Sequoia Middle School for reconfiguration as a new non-traditional high school Kent Phoenix Academy opened at the former Sequoia Middle School site in September 2007 2006 construction funding approval also provided for some additional classrooms to be constructed at Kentlake and Kent-Meridian High Schools. Some impact fees will be utilized for the new construction that will increase capacity Enrollment projections reflect future need for additional capacity at the elementary level and unfunded facility needs will be reviewed in the future Some funding is secured for additional portables and some will be funded from impact fees For the Six-Year Finance Plan, costs of future schools are based on estimates 1 from Kent School District Facilities Department. Please see pages 26-27 for a summary of the cost basis. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2009 Page 24 N M O O O M O O O O O O N v O o o O O o o O pl O O C` In E m a v N N o N — LL w en Fn e9 e> ss � � � N m 0o a J m 0 E y N N m tlJ N 0 Cl) O i0 O O Oco p 00 00 O N O d (n O O � C'i O O pj Q N U q'1 f` O O � co O 64 N m �F fH EH N k9 MK M�rM J O O O M O O J o 0 0 0 0 0 Q o 0 o m o N o Q h N t0 -0 O (y 49 I"' t9 19 y(Vy fA N� MfA f9 O N to r Z 0 Z J E V d o o W N 69 QZ m �O G Z O O O O d o CDU J U. CIOO O O O O R Q N M N O N X O y O m y w Z O 00 a ON 0) w Co W O N O y Y ON N N t m $ c a m w N bN9 N N E a V to N y m v d 3 E ' .4 ❑ O a w w O O O y w c c O m to N fig LL O N N E W uOoi Oo 59 MCfj Uyc r-0N m c y E ° 0 0) aO O LO Ld y L cliN C) O 0mmm ay � � N w 69 2 E y c :? m LL LL LL LL LL LL :n c (0 O H O LL 3 n m C S m o 'o mEL 3 N L- m U O C N U O m LU N m J m D m 0 % LL F = 0 m LL O W Q cu II y C y N y JO w @ g w mm ~O Z U m 0 m o O Z @ E c m1 _ ¢ m m W Y y M O c m y m c m U Y Y Y N w it � d o m m m y fn `� w 2 g 2 J c z 9 w a 0 y c « m vLL a 0 o $ rn c m ~ Q w O 0 Y $ c c m LL M t m 0 m '�O V m a >O m W [D F- LL U W Q Q d U W ry ro a V I I I Finance Plan - Cost Basis Summary For impact fee calculations, construction costs are based on cost of the last elementary school, adjusted for inflation, and projected cost of the next elementary school Elementary School Cost Protected Cost Millennium Elementary #30 Opened in 2000 $12,182,768 Cost of Panther Lake Elementary Replacement (To open in 2009) $26,700,000 I Projected cost - Covington Elementary Replacement (Projected to open in 2011) $28,900,000 Protected cost of Elementary #31 in 2012 $30,320,000 Average cost of Covington Elem. replacement & Elementary #31 $29,610,000 IConstruction cost of the additions to two high schools: Senior High School Additions Projected Cost Total 2008 Addition to Kentlake High School $5,700,000 2009 Addition to Kent-Meridian HS $2,500,000 Construction cost of new HS capacity $8,200,000 Site Acquisition Cost The site acquisition cost is based on an average cost of sites purchased or built I on within the last ten years. Please see Table 7 on page 27 for a list of site acquisition costs and averages. District Adjustment The impact fee calculations on pages 29 and 30 include a "District Adjustment" which is equal to the amount of increase that the impact fee formulas drive out for this year and adjusted for increase in the Consumer Price Index Kent School oislnct Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2009 Page 26 a o m 1 m a U M m r N N 00 N CO Q Q r C\j m w LO co (A w 603 a = O N n _m 9 O W f (q d D) 69 c0 M 00 't 00 N Q M M M U-) V 00 .0. o N. O N M 7 N M r ~ 69 CD eH (O to 03 m 69 ER 64 U3 Q M O Cl) co M (D N N O CO .~- (O O O O 00 O O C. (O (O m U7 ;n (O M CO Ln It (D (D O n N O o U 00 D) r` (O It M M M O R U (D U d O to (D O D) V M (O CO ER V3 K3 H3 N• b4 � ER 6g 64 � , m fi4 Q Lo V O � V N M O M O 00 .-- o In It Q Q cz m m N O _ O O 0 bN+ C V a at N U d a Z ♦♦0 N Cl) v fn N fn r V p " m cn (n o v G. O o c Z Y coo r co ' ° m N o ° L m G m E �- c N Y m Y cn _m iq m c Q G `° u(oi W vo a n o N ry U W g N � N (Q J N d W U) U] M N (n U) U) O t N O O Y W .o- U L d c a o F (� d o m rn v N M M co rn rn M 0 o m o rn rn rn m m rn m rn Z U) N N N NO ¢ N U �W/ 3 a i O } �- N O` p ° p) a Q) J a o' ' Q > co y o a a E H 08 ° m E E 0 0 o g v a Q g L U 5 fn C O U O Y O c d N c CO o ° m m p d fA n O m 2U o d c y�y a U m N c Q U Q m ° a > Z a z o m U1 E x -`o c o r U' m a c o CO �. W W D Y m L L S 4 Q m N pw CO) C Y U m n m u c m U Y m o c J t >, m m o Y rn N O 3 o a U > E ° ° m W m LCD t ai iE 2 N 2 o c U i 0) of U) > cc D O U ° N y o a w Z U) Y Y Y 2 o U> cq (n co Co O U w D_ Z' C C O C C m c M F N a = •- U) w Z v M r w ry W � � Y s t KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT FACTORS FOR ESTIMATED IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS Student Generation Factors -Single Family Student Generation Factors -Multi-Family Elementary (Grades K- 6) 0.445 Elementary 0.296 Middle School (Grades 7 -8) Oils Middle School 0 075 Senior High (Grades 9 - 12) 0 245 Senior High 0 111 Total 0 808 Total 0 482 Projected Increased Student Capacity OSPI -Square Footage per Student Elementary 600 Elementary 90 Middle School 900 Middle School 117 Senior High 250 Senior High 130 Special Education 144 Required Site Acreage per Facility ' Elementary (required) 11 Average Site Cost 1 Acre Middle School (required) 21 Elementary $287,573 Senior High (required) 32 Middle School $0 Senior High $0 New Facility Construction Cost Elementary " $29,610,000 Temporary Facility Capacity & Cost ' Middle School $0 Elementary @ 24 $123,430 Senior High $8,200,000 Middle School @ 29 $0 •See cost basis on Pg 26 Senior High @ 31 $0 Temporary Facility Square Footage State Equalization Credit(iomafiy•stateMaich•) Elementary 73,748 Current District Equalization Percentage 55 78% Middle School 18,544 Senior High 22,960 ` Total 3% 115,252 Area Cost Allowance ACA-Cost/Sq. Ft. Area Cost Allowance(Effective July 08) $168 79 Permanent Facility Square Footage ' Elementary 1,475,936 Middle School 660,904 District Average Assessed Value Senior High 1,121,963 Single Family Residence $348,876 1 Total 97% 3,258,803 Total Facilities Square Footage District Average Assessed Value Elementary 1,549,684 Multi-Family Residence $121,557 Middle School 679,448 Apartments 71%Condos 29% 1 Senior High 1,144,923 Total 3,374,055 Capital Levy Tax Rate/$1,000 Current /$1,000 Tax Rate(1 73255) $1 73 1 Developer Provided Sites/Facilities Value 0 General Obligation Bond Interest Rate Dwelling Units 0 Current Bond Inte,est Rate 4 96% Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2009 Page 28 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Site Acquisition Cost per Single Family Residence Formula ((Acres x Cost per Acre)/Facility Capacity)x Student Generation Factor Required Site Acreage I Average Site Cost/Acre I Facility Capacity Student Factor ' A 1 (Elementary) 11 $287,573 600 0 445 $2,346 12 A 2 (Middle School) 21 $0 1,065 0 118 $0 A 3 (Semor High) 32 $0 1,000 0 245 $0 0 808 A cm $2,34612 Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Single Family Residence Formula ((Facility Cost/Facility Capacity)x Student Factor)x(Permanentfrotal Square Footage Ratio) Construction Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio B 1 (Elementary) $29,610.000 600 0 445 097 $21,301 93 B 2 (Middle School) $0 900 0 118 097 $0 B 3 (Senior High) $8,200,000 250 0 245 097 $7,794 92 0 808 B $29,096 85 Temporary Facility Cost per Single Family Residence , Formula ((Facility Cost/Facility Capacity)x Student Factor)x(Temporary!Total Square Footage Ratio) Facility Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio C 1 (Elementary) $123,430 24 0 445 003 $68 66 C 2 (Middle School) $0 29 Oils 003 $0 C 3 (Senior High) $0 31 0 245 003 $0 0 808 C S68 66 District Equalization Credit per Single Family Residence (formerly"State Match") Formula Area Cost Allowance x SPI Square Feet per student x District Equalization% x Student Factor Area Cost Allowance SPI Sq Ft /Student Equalization% Student Factor D 1 (Elementary) $168 79 90 05578 0 445 $3,770 75 D 2 (Middle School) $168 79 117 0 0 118 $0 D 3 (Senior High) $168 79 130 05578 0 245 $2,998 71 C b $6,769 a6 Tax Credit per Single Family Residence Average SF Residential Assessed Value $348,876 Current Capital Levy Rate 1$1,000 — $1 73 Current Bond Interest Rate 4 96% Years Amortized (10 Years) 10 TC b $4,675 66 Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility/Site Value Dwelling Units 0 0 FC b 0 Fee Recap A = Site Acquisition per SF Residence $2,346 12 B = Permanent Facility Cost per Residence $29,096 85 C = Temporary Facility Cost per Residence $68 66 Subtotal $31,511 62 D = State Match Credit per Residence $6,769 46 TC=Tax Credit per Residence $4,675 66 Subtotal - $11,44512 Total Unfunded Need $20,066 50 50%Developer Fee Obligation $10,033 FC=Facility Credit(if applicable) 0 District Adjustment (See Page 26 for explanation) ($4,639) Net Fee Obligation per Single Family Residence $5,394 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2009 Page 29 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 1 IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for MULTI.FAMILY RESIDENCE Site Acquisition Cost per Multi-Family Residence Unit Formula ((Acres x Cost per Acre)1 Facility Capacity)x Student Generation Factor ' I Required Site Acreage Average Site Cost'Acre I Fac ity Capacity Student Factor A 1 (Elementary) 11 $287,573 500 0 296 S1,872 68 A 2 (Middle School) 21 $0 1,065 0 075 $0 A 3 (Senior High) 32 $0 1,000 0 111 $0 0 482 A b $1,872 68 1 Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Multi-Family Residence Unit Formula, ((Facility Cost/ Facility Capacity)x Student Factor)x(Permanent/Total Square Footage Ratio) Construction Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio B 1 (Elementary) $29,610,000 600 0 296 097 $14,169 37 B 2 (Middle School) $0 900 0 075 097 $0 B 3 (Senior High) $8,200,000 250 0 111 097 $3,531 56 0 482 B $17,700 95 Temporary Facility Cost per Multi-Family Residence Unit Formula ((Facility Cost!Facility Capacity)x Student Factor)x(Temporary i Total Square Footage Ratio) Facility Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio C 1 (Elementary) $123,430 24 0 296 003 $45.67 C 2 (Middle School) $0 29 0 075 003 $0 C 3 (Senior High) $0 31 0 111 003 $0 0 482 C $45 67 District Equalization Credit per Multi-Family Residence (formerly"State Match") Formula Area Cost Allowance x SPI Square Feet per student x District Equalization% x Student Factor Area Cost Allowance SPl Sc Ft ;Student Equalization°i6 Student Factor D 1 (Elementary) $168 79 90 05578 0 296 $2,508 18 D 2 (Middle School) $168 79 117 0 0 075 $0 D 3 (Senior High) $168 79 130 05578 0 111 $1,358 6D D b $3,866 78 Tax Credit per Multi-Family Residence Unit Average MF Residential Assessed Value $121,557 Current Capital Levy Rate 1$1,000 S1 73 Current Bond Interest Rate 4 96% Years Amortized (10 Years) 10 TC b $1,363 29 jDeveloper Provided Facility Credit Facility!Site Value Dwelling Units 0 0 FC 0 Fee Recap A = Site Acquisition per Multi-Family Unit $1,872 68 B = Permanent Facility Cost per MF Unit $17,700 95 C = Temporary Facility Cost per MF Unit $45 67 Subtotal $19,619.29 D = State Match Credit per MF Unit $3,866 78 TC=Tax Credit per MF Unit $1,363 29 Subtotal $5,230 07 Total Unfunded Need $14,38922 50%Developer Fee Obligation $7,195 FC=Facility Credit(if applicable) 0 District Adjustment (See Page 26 for explanation) ($31873) Net Fee Obligation per Multi-Family Residence Unit $3,322 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Apn12009 Page 30 IX Summary of Changes to April 2008 Capital Facilities Plan The Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") is updated annually based on previous Plans in effect since 1993. The primary changes from the April 2008 Plan are ' summarized here Projects in progress include replacement and expansion of Panther Lake and Covington Elementary schools, a future new elementary school, classroom additions at high schools to accommodate new growth, renovation for Kent Phoenix Academy and Phase II of the renovation at Mill Creek Middle School Changes to capacity continue to reflect fluctuations in class size as well as program changes. Reduction in class size and extended learning opportunities for Student Achievement Initiative 728 are reflected in this update. Changes in relocatabies or transitional capacity reflect use, purchase, sale, surplus and/or movement between facilities. Permanent and temporary facility ratio has changed from 96 — 4% to 97— 3% The student enrollment forecast is updated annually. Six-year Kindergarten projections were modified to meet the requirements for State Funded Full Day Kindergarten programs. The district expects to receive some state equalization (formerly "matching") funds for protects in this Plan and tax credit factors are updated annually Biennieal update of student generation rates was reported last year. Unfunded site and facility needs will be reviewed in the future. Changes to Impact Fee Calculation Factors Include- ' ITEM GradefType FROM TO Comments Student Generation Factor Elem 0 445 0 445 No Change—Update in 2010 Single Family(SF) Ms 0118 0 118 SH 0 245 0 245 Total 0 808 0 808 No Change—Biennial Update Student Generation Factor Etem 0 296 0 296 No Change—Update in 2010 Multi-Family(MF) Ms 0 075 0 075 SH Dill 0 111 Total 0 482 0 482 No Change—Biennial Update District Equalization Ratios (former State Match) 57 06% 55 78% Per OSPI Website Area Cost Allowance (former Boeckh Index) $168 79 $168 79 Per OSPI Website Average Assessed Valuation (AV) SF $316,091 $348,876 Per Puget Sound ESD AV -Average of Condominiums & Apts. MF $102,465 $121,557 Per Puget Sound ESD Debt Service Capital Levy Rate 1$1000 $1 73 $1 73 Per King Co Assessor Report General Obligation Bond Interest Rate 5 11% 4 96% Market Rate Impact Fee-Single Family SF $5,304 $5,394 Change to fee+$90 Impact Fee- Multi-Family MF $3,266 $3,322 Change to fee+$56 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2009 Page 31 X Appendixes Appendix A: Calculations of Capacities for Elementary Schools Appendix B: Calculations of Capacities for Middle Schools Appendix C: Calculations of Capacities for Senior High Schools Appendix D: Use of Relocatables Appendix E: Student Generation Factor Survey i Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2009 Page 32 M M m a U- 0 Z C N W o o m r� t�pp pp ((yy E8 LO q J N W d N m T o c w V m A G p K m a wo � � E U c Z o E w m W * � m y rn {— oo N m o 00 pp o 0 o O n O m <o rn o n po d M o N o m o m m o o m o 0 0 ° a D Z N LL E N M N N N O N N N M O O O N 0 0 N po- N O O O O N O N N a O � m o N N m n N tNp O pNp N N ((Npp yy A m ? 0 a N 0 0 W fOD m (NO ppN N O O N U a w m a 0 o p O w id N e m d m + N rn It W o vc LL o a o a Y w m .9 N J C 9Cl O O O T m g E W U °� S n `� ° m Eo o Lo Q m m U o n O V< m m + v m Q N d M N m N r• m m N O O m O N n N m e- O M co N m O N M U Z O a UJ m a a v °, E yy pp m (n O O� A iNfl O O O N to N 0 O 0f N A !!dpO ry A d N N O O d pMp m spy O (� I� W G 8 d w O N U rn O Z J � N N N F- W O w d va CL iL _ j m E co ? n G N O O O O N O M N N N ch 7 o o o p m Y m v 3 1 c n m 0 � V a •. N b N C U o yy E E LL o $- e o r°0i v �d c v my e a 7i `gM a a voi a �i v $ voi a ov c`Qi vor mm CTo E ew N m m m n O 0 N ~ CL y N n o f m m o rn n n m m N n rn pp m N m W E S O U - z' a U c N Z m F=- R' fWA m w U o x a 3 w it w U d i ti a o p c E 3 = a U U U U w w LL ❑ C� C7 2 Y -+ f Z a a i 3 U m y `) 5 -2 g c a a m ❑ E 2, ,� 0 �c m m v Q a 0 m E 8 0 2 N Y o p O F o c x m m a a H ,R ° -COZO m m ❑ m � FF m � a m E a) x s � m u 0 vim, o U N Y W M Uwm am orn> N wm 2G w o c N J m =) °Oc N 5Y }o Em mm n U U w 0 0 C7 mx a a cn /n Cl)N y r m m m m w Y w N_ 8 C m Y a Zo' E n o u� m N ro n o E w n nD n OD N N 0 00 O N N N h c _ c N W m W CAa O W y o o O n n o V O NLO ZLL O O r N S tD ry0 LL E O O N n O N O L N W p N O n ccn n S N n Z d W a W r fV N x w N m ON 2' n aoa « N W Q u a T O O { O M m N .�- .N- � = W � � � D. O Q U m U cs N U > a o n S E8 m E E E c a o m E a } (O y N O O tD O O H '0 1+'l to -WVI O O m LL _o E ] U NL y LL 'p W W U N m a n it p a � a f V ON p J M O N O N N O m U ' e0 r IL W p 6 a A W lT N M W a.9 r Q1] N Z O W of �p 1n N W O a �j v V1 W N a U 8 of [V Nau, o6 U ry N L S m UW X a X 1 a 0 w u o o� a Q m a v co O a}C g a m N rn o rn Z of u o� M ao c�i W m j S U n rya O N M M M J O n a U m d ti U a, w o d z a y a ro o a� O W n O1 N n r v N to E Q m E v m r d rn a o of CL COQ N ? W 3`6 c a Wul w Z @ w m N N N Q n n m O IA M p> W N N 9 r r N U W x R1 m pp Q N W U O rD V N N < O f7 W W U co eN- r In 9 m p l-QLJ a �N N c�0 O t+1 N O N U1 j O tD G N '^ N y (pp (n a C Q N ® N y ' @ J d 7k !n m M N M N M M M m # Ln V D U "y0 Z N Of h O O W g ` m -� ?i �° x -� m @ o c L ; Q U Z T ¢ Y Y Y Y U'v a N j = a W g a m W21 en v p 8 3 t L N m J U IG o W J n L L U V7 Q O n 9 N (0 O co �j to m d > ~ � 0 x = ) p m ~O Y _❑ U y y y p D C 0�' 2 O C Q V f-. O p T p y P a ti a c o Y z 0 � � m ro � c � � U m � ° E m o 0m d a s a s o o H 2 m CC�ii o x_ Y Y Y Y n N C vi fJl W � O p c G) Y � : / 2 ! [ , _ ! : r [ 6 ~ O \ y $ \ _ a - ° - ) { \ E . « = r § CL x . , _ , , , LU a / t; ! \ - - � U) - _ \/ ! ) o \ \ 0 ~ \ 7 \ / _ ® ` ma ® } { Of \ _\ \ co\ } _ } j \ \ \ ƒ ( $ I ! ( \ ® % t / 4 _ \ \ _ \ § - E 2 \ _ ƒ \ ) 2 Jcc , , 75 � @ I(� l0 c0 00 fp M a 0 N 0 ,� (n O O T N M o O N M ` M O N N = r O M r _ M N M d' O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O O a Mm O U to co 00) 11 n r n rn cD co o L.L U m T M co C, ►`� N o 0 o O o o O c o o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O p O o 0 O 0 0 m Q N ` OJ N c c (7 E r N M N 0 O O N M M 0 O V � � £ O A O) mO 0 gj M a CA w O Qi O a7 0 00 0 M M a0 !� � al � M N N V Y N C a) d <O N M V <D N V V c r Y U W o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o p w o 0 0 0 0 0 o C � Y U) O o co i['1 r co M O M a L OM co Lo' m O O N M N cO sOs{{ O N .�- N co f.- M cp m p O 0 r 0 a0 0 N N 1� 0 COCD O H O O O N O O O O O O G O O O O Y O O O = N N N N m ^ < N f0 O N t'01 = N N 1C) '�„ N O r T c � N N 0 N N N at �" N c 2 n 0 N Cl O Z C] co cA E o 0 00 7 a) 0 O) a00 v v O� N v )� N W r c LU N N N tN0 O er- U ` w �- " LU o .. cu L co r Y K p M OJ 'n .0 M 00 1� Cl) 1� Q QC O 0 N M r a^O Cl) (D M N N �f7 F CD 10 M coh N CO z Q M Y Y a p a _ � _ r M a O Y M O h 0 0 T 7 N OJ Io co S $ O r Y 0 0 Q (� C r r Q) Or N f 1 co CO p� F- N N a0 �[1 N N N N F- r U c � z � F- N a° O U -i w � � O 3 a o x x x z m a U rn (n U) En U x v z � U E ¢ U w CA LL 0 a s c9 a Y w w 0 0 0 c y o c _ o) w d > C c 0 C a U Y G d d ` V O C N m N l0 N > N C LL ccm Y a m N d 0 m Q) aI y a) m > Y Y c Y m O U W m L y C y 0 .m_. m Y 9 f0 Y c Y C w d > 3 0 U 0 E °J o U. c aci o Z co U U c c <0 o a m a m U > > " Y Y oa v, d o y ° > '.3 E L a m c x m o ' N m w a) c >_ U LL aci m Q m c Q m rn > t o o w a a+ $ p c a m v a) w > O) -O a d' m N 7 m Y ~ d y �c , m y x a d d m m aci .D u Y Q $ a p m 0 a m O $ c Uo mU U ya U oo n6 ] o a ' co - u Yt oFw U- c 0 $u LL C. 0.' fn to N o c w 1 DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE for Kent School District No 415 2009 Capital Facilities Plan Issued with a 14-day comment and appeal period. i Description of Proposal This threshold determination analyzes the environmental impacts associated with the following actions, which are so closely related to each other that they are in effect a single action 1. The adoption of the Kent School District 2009 Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan by the Kent School District for the purposes of planning for the facilities needs of the District 2. The amendment of the King County Comprehensive Plan to include the Kent School District 2009 Capital Facilities Plan as a part of the Capital Facilities Plan Element of the King County Comprehensive Plan 3. The amendment of the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Kent to include the Kent School District's 2009 Capital Facilities Plan as part of the Capital Facilities Plan Element of the Comprehensive Plans of the City of Kent. 4 The amendment of the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Covington to include the Kent School District's 2009 Capital Facilities Plan as part of the Capital Facilities Plan Element of the Comprehensive Plans of the City of Covington 5. The amendment of the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Auburn to include the Kent School District's 2009 Capital Facilities Plan as part of the Capital Facilities Plan Element of the Comprehensive Plans of the City of Auburn 6 The amendment of the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Renton to include the Kent School District's 2009 Capital Facilities Plan as part of the Capital Facilities Plan Element of the Comprehensive Plans of the City of Renton 7 This proposal may also involve amendment of Comprehensive Plans of the Cities of Maple Valley, Black Diamond, and/or SeaTac to incorporate the Kent School District 2009 Capital Facilities Plan into the Capital Facilities element of that jurisdiction's Comprehensive Pian Proponent Kent School District No 415 Y Location of the Proposal: The Kent School District includes an area of approximately 72 square miles The City of Covington and portions of the cities of Kent, Auburn, Renton, Black Diamond, Maple Valley, and SeaTac fall within the District's boundaries, as do parts of unincorporated King County. Lead Agency. Kent School District No 415 is the lead agency pursuant to WAC 197-11-926 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that the proposal does not pose a probable significant adverse impact to the environment An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43 21C.030 (2) (c) This decision was made after a review of the completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency This information is available to the public upon request This Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date of issue. Comments must be submitted by 4:00 p m., June 19, 2009 The responsible official will reconsider the DNS based on timely comments and may retain, modify, or, if significant adverse impacts are likely, withdraw the DNS If the DNS is retained, it will be final after the expiration of the comment deadline. Responsible Official Fred H Higher Assistant Superintendent for Business Services Kent School District No 415 Telephone: (253) 373-7295 Address- 12033 SE 256th Street#A-600 Kent, Washington 98030-6643 Appeals of this determination are governed by Board Policy No 9280 which can be obtained from Fred High, Assistant Superintendent for Business Services, Kent School District No 415, 12033 SE 256th Street #A-600, Kent, Washington 98030-6643 and pursuant to WAC 197-11- 680 and RCW 43 21 C.075 Date of Issue: June 5, 2009 1 Date Published- June 5, 2009 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAC 197-11-960 Environmental Checklist Purpose of Checklist- tThe State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43 21 C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply " Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there rnay be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonprofect proposals: Complete this checklist for nonprofect proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply" In addition, complete the Supplemental Sheet for nonprofect actions (part D) For nonprofect actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "appl;cant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "prepares," and "affected geographic area," respectively 1 A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed protect, if applicable. The adoption of a six-year Capital Facilities Plan by the Kent School District The Comprehensive Plans of King County, City of Kent, City of Covington, City of Renton, City of Auburn and possibly Cities of Maple Valley, Black Diamond and SeaTac have been and/or will be amended to include the Kent School District 2009 Capital Facilities Plan in the Capital Facilities Plan Element of each jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan. A copy of the District's Plan is available for review in the District Finance & Planning Department 2. Name of applicant: Kent School District No. 415 3 Address and phone number of applicant and contact person. Kent School District No 415 12033 SE 256th Street # A-600 Kent, WA 98030-6643 Contact Person. Fred H High, Assistant Superintendent for Business Services Telephone (253) 373-7295 4. Date checklist prepared June 2, 2009 5 Agency requesting checklist. Kent School District No. 415 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable) The 2009 Kent School District Capital Facilities Plan is scheduled to be adopted in July, 2009 and forwarded to King County, Cities of Kent, Covington, Auburn, Renton, Maple Valley, Black Diamond, and SeaTac for possible inclusion in each jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan The Capital Facilities Plan will be updated annually Site-specific projects have been or will be subject to project-specific environmental review. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain The Capital Facilities Plan reviews additions to existing high schools, renovations at Mill Creek Middle School and Kent Phoenix Academy, construction replacing Panther Lake Elementary School and proposes construction of a new elementary school and a replacement of Covington Elementary School 2 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal The above-referenced projects will undergo environmental review at the time of formal proposal 9 Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known King County and Cities of Kent, Covington and Auburn will review and approve the Capital Facilities Plan for the purposes of impact fee ordinances and will need to adopt the Plan as an amendment to the Capital Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of King County and Cities of Kent, Covington, Renton and Auburn Cities of Maple Valley, Black Diamond, and SeaTac may also review and approve the Plan for the purposes of any school impact fee ordinances and may adopt the Plan as an amendment to the Capital Facilities element of their Comprehensive Plans 11. Give a brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal You do not need to repeat those answers on this page (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description ) This is a non-project action This proposal involves the adoption of the Kent School District 2009 Capital Facilities Plan for the purpose of planning the facilities needs of the District and for inclusion in the Capital Facilities Plan element and possible amendment of the Comprehensive Plans for King County, City of Covington, City of Kent, City of Renton, City of Auburn, City of SeaTac, City of Maple Valley and City of Black Diamond. A copy of the Capital Facilities Plan may be viewed at the Kent School District Business Services Department office 12 Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address if any, and section, township, and range, if known If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s) Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist The 2009 Capital Facilities Plan will affect the Kent School District The District includes an area of approximately 72 square miles The City of Covington, and portions of the Cities of Kent, Auburn, Renton, Black Diamond, Maple Valley, SeaTac and parts of unincorporated King County fall within the District's boundaries i 3 1 B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a General description of the site (circle one), Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other The Kent School District is comprised of a variety of topographic land forms and gradients, including all of those listed Specific topographic characteristics will be identified during the planning and permit process for each capital project b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Specific slope characteristics will be identified during the planning and permit process for each capital project c What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural sods, specify them and note any prime farmland Specific sod types will be identified during the planning and permit process for each capital project d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable sods in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Unstable sods may exist within the Kent School District Specific sod limitations on individual project sites will be identified at the time of environmental review. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed Indicate source of fill Individual protects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be subject to project- specific environmental review and local approval at the time of proposal Proposed grading projects, as well as the purpose, type, quantity, and source of fill materials will be identified as appropriate to each project f Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. It is possible that erosion could occur as a result of construction projects currently proposed in the Capital Facilities Plan Individual projects and their erosion impacts will be evaluated on a site-specific basis individual projects will be subject to environmental review and local approval on the time of proposal. g About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings?) Percentage of impervious cover will vary with each capital facilities project and will be addressed during project-specific environmental review l 4 h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any Erosion potential on individual project sites will be addressed during project-specific environmental review Relevant erosion reduction and control requirements will be s met 1 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i e , dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known Various emissions, many construction-related, may result from individual projects. Air-quality impacts will be evaluated during project-specific environmental review Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor thent may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe Off-site sources and necessary mitigation will be addressed during project-specific environmental review c Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Plans for individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject to environmental review and relevant local approval processes, including obtaining of any necessary air quality permits, at the time individual projects are formally proposed Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into There is a network of surface water bodies within the Kent School District. The surface water regimes and flow patterns have been or will be researched and incorporated in the design of each individual project. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans Some projects may require work near these described waters. Individual projects in the Capital Facilities Plan will be subject to environmental review and local approval requirements at the time the project is formally proposed 5 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected Indicate the source of fill material. Information with respect to placement or removal of fill or dredge material will be addressed at the time of project-specific environmental review. Applicable local regulations have been or will be satisfied. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Any surface water withdrawals or diversions have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Each capital facilities project, if located in a floodplain area, will be required to meet applicable local regulations for flood areas 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge Specific information regarding discharges of waste materials, if any, will be addressed during project-specific environmental review Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. b. Ground. 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may impact ground water resources Each project will be evaluated during project-specific environmental review Applicable local regulations have been or will be satisfied. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example Domestic sewage, industrial, containing the following chemicals . . ., agricultural; etc ) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the systern(s) are expected to serve Impacts of discharged waste material, if any, have been or will be addressed during site-specific, project-level environmental review 6 Y c. Water Runoff (including storm water), 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known) Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may have varying storm water runoff consequences Each project will be subject to environmental review and applicable local regulations 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will have varying environmental impacts and will be subject to appropriate review and local regulations prior to construction. Information regarding waste materials will be presented at the time of such review Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any Specific measures to reduce or control runoff impacts have been or will be developed on a project-specific basis in cooperation with the appropriate jurisdiction 4. Plants- a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site, _ deciduous tree alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree fir, cedar, pine, other - shrubs grass pasture _ crop or grain wet soil plants- cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants. water lily, eelgrass, mdfoil, other other types of vegetation There are various vegetative zones within the Kent School District. An inventory of species has been or will be produced as part of project-specific environmental review b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? i 7 Impacts on vegetation will be determined at the time of protect-specific environmental review at the time the protect is formally proposed Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions c List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site Specific impacts to these species from individual protects has been or will be determined at the time of protect proposal and will be addressed during site-specific, protect-level environmental review. d Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any Individual protects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be subject to environmental review and local approval at the time of project proposal 5 Animals: a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site birds hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals* deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other. An inventory of species observed on or near sites has been or will be developed during project-specific environmental review. b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Specific impacts to these species from individual projects will be determined at the time of project proposal and will be reviewed in cooperation with the affected jurisdictions c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Impacts on migration routes, if any, will be addressed during site-specific, project- level environmental review 8 id. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any- Appropriate measures to preserve or enhance wildlife have been or will be determined at the time of site-specific, project-level environmental review 6 Energy and Natural Resources a What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. The State Board of Education requires a life-cycle cost analysis of all heating, lighting, and insulating systems prior to allowing specific projects to proceed Energy needs will be decided at the time of specific engineering and site design planning Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions b Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. Individual projects of this Capital Facilities Plan will be evaluated as to their impact on the solar potential of adjacent projects during environmental review c What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any. Energy conservation measures will be considered at the project-specific design phase and environmental review 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any- Proposed projects will comply with all current codes, standards, and rules and regulations Individual projects have been or will be subject to environmental review and local approval at the time of formal submittal. 9 b Noise. 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your protect(for example traffic, equipment, operation, other)? A variety of noises exist within the Kent School District. Specific noise sources have been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example. traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site Normal construction noises would exist on a short-term basis during school construction There could be an increase in traffic or operations-related noise which would be addressed during project specific environmental review Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Project noise impacts have been or will be evaluated and mitigated during the project-specific environmental review Each project is or will be subject to applicable local regulations. 8. Land and Shoreline Use: a What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? There are a variety of land uses within the Kent School District, including residential, commercial, industrial, institutional, utility, agricultural, forestry, open space, recreational, etc b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. This question will be addressed during site-specific, project-level environmental review. c. Describe any structures on the site. Structures located on proposed sites have been or will be identified and described during project-specific environmental review when appropriate d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Structures to be demolished, if any, will be identified as part of the project-specific environmental review process e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? 10 j There are a variety of zoning classifications within the Kent School District Site specific zoning information has been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? An inventory of comprehensive plan designations has been or will be completed during project-specific environmental review. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Any shoreline master program designations have been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Environmentally sensitive areas, if any, will be identified during project-specific environmental review. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? This information has been or will be provided at the time of project-specific environmental review j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? It is not anticipated that proposed projects will displace any people Displacement of people. if any will be evaluated during project-specific environmental review k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any; Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be subject to project- specific environmental review and local approval at the time the project is formally proposed 1 I Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any Compatibility of the proposal and specific projects with existing uses and plans have been or will be assessed as part of the comprehensive planning process and during project-specific environmental review. 9. Housing. a Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing No housing units would be provided b Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing Any impact of protect proposals on existing housing have been or would be evaluated during protect-specific environmental review procedures c Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any Measures to reduce or control any housing impacts have been or will be addressed during site-specific, project-level environmental review. 10 Aesthetics: a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building matenal(s) proposed? Aesthetic impacts have been or will be determined at the time of site-specific, project- level environmental review b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Aesthetic impacts have been or will be determined at the time of site-specific, project- level environmental review c Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Appropriate measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts have been or will be determined at the time of project-specfic environmental review. 11. Light and Glare. a What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Light or glare impacts have been or will be determined at the time of project-specific environmental review b Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Light or glare impacts have been or will be determined at the time of project-specific environmental review c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Off-site sources of light or glare have been or will be evaluated at the time of project specific environmental review 12 d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Mitigation of light and glare impacts has been or will be addressed during project- specific environmental review ' 12. Recreation- a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? There are a variety of formal and informal recreational facilities within the Kent School District b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. Recreational impacts have been or will be addressed during project specific environmental review Projects in the Capital Facilities Plan may enhance recreational opportunities and uses. c Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any Any adverse effects on recreation stemming from individual project proposals have been or will be subject to mitigation during the environmental review procedure A school site usually provides recreational facilities to the community in the form of additional play fields and gymnasiums. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation- a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. The existence of historic and cultural resources will be determined at the time of project-specific environmental review b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. An inventory of historical sites has been or will be conducted as part of project specific environmental review c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Appropriate measures have been or will be proposed on a project-specific bans_ 13 14. Transportation: a Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Impact on public streets and highways has been or will be assessed during project- specific environmental review b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? The relationship between specific projects and public transit has been or will be assessed during project-specific environmental review c How many parking spaces would the completed protect have? How many would the project eliminate? An inventory of parking spaces and the impacts of specific projects on parking spaces has been or will be conducted during project-specific environmental review d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing ' roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). The development of new schools may require new access roads or streets This issue will be fully addressed during project-specific environmental review. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Use of water, rail or air transportation has been or will be addressed during site- specific, project-level environmental review f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Each project proposal has been or will be separately evaluated as to traffic impacts g Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any- Mitigation of impacts on transportation has been or will be addressed during project- specific environmental review. 15. Public Services. a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe 14 I The District does not anticipate that the projects identified in the Capital Facilities Plan will substantially increase the need for other public services Impacts have been or will be evaluated on a protect-specific basis b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Schools are built with automatic security systems, fire alarms, smoke alarms, heat sensors and sprinkler systems 16 Utilities a Circle utilities currently available at the site, electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other Utilities available at project sites have been or will be identified during project specific environmental review b Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed Utility revisions and construction needs will be identified during project-specific environmental review C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision Signature:, Fred H High,AasistAnt Supenntender for Business Services Date Submitted. June 5, 2009 15 D SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS , (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air, production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? To the extent this Plan makes it more likely that school facilities will be constructed, and/or renovated or remodeled, some of these environmental impacts will be more likely Additional impermeable surfaces, such as roofs, parking lots, sidewalks, access roads and playgrounds will increase storm water runoff, which could enter surface or ground water Emissions to air could result from heating systems, emergency generators and other equipment, and from additional car and bus trips to and from the school for students and faculty Any emissions resulting from this Plan should not require the production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances, with the possible exception of storage of diesel fuel or gasoline for emeraency generating equipment Noise may result from additional traffic and from concentrating several hundred children at a new facility, especially before and after school and during recesses To the extent this proposal allows additional residential development to occur, these impacts would also increase somewhat, but it is not possible to quantify those impacts at this time The impacts would depend on the type, location and distribution of housing, for example, whether single or multiple family and the location of the school , Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Facilities implementing the Plan have been or will be evaluated at the project specific level and impacts will be mitigated accordingly Storm water detention and runoff will meet applicable County and/or City requirements and, depending on the date of actual construction, may be subject to a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ("NPDES") permitting requirements Discharges to air will be minimal, and will meet any applicable requirements of the Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Authority Fuel oil will be stored according to local and state requirements 16 1 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? The Plan itself will have no impact on these elements of the environment Depending on the particular site, construction of facilities may require clearing sites of plants and loss of animal habitat To the extent residential development is allowed, additional area may be cleared and eliminated as habitat for animals There are not likely to be I any impacts on fish or marine life, although some water quality degradation in streams and rivers could occur due to increased residential development These impacts have been or will be addressed in more detail during project-specific environmental review when appropriate Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are tIndividual protects will be evaluated and mitigated appropriately on a protect-specific basis, but specific mitigation proposals cannot be identified at this time 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? 1 Any actual protects resulting from this Plan would consume heating fuel and electrical energy Increased traffic resulting from the construction of additional facilities would consume petroleum based fuels Reduced traffic resulting from construction of another neighborhood school may also reduce amounts of fuel consumed, but it is not possible to quantify such reduction in consumption at this time. These impacts have been or will be addressed in more detail during protect-specific environmental review when appropriate. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are Facilities would be constructed in accordance with applicable energy efficiency standards 4 How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection, such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? The Plan and facilities constructed pursuant to the Plan should have no impact an these resources It is not possible to predict whether other development made possible by this Plan would affect sensitive areas Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: No specific measures are being proposed at this time Appropriate measures have been or will be proposed during protect-specific review Annual updates of this Plan will be coordinated with King County, Cities of Kant, Covington, Auburn, Renton, SeaTac, Maple Valley and Black Diamond as part of the Growth Management Act process, one of the purposes of which is to protect environmentally sensitive areas To the extent the School District's facilities planning process is part of the -overall growth management planning process, these resources are more likely to be protected 17 5 How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? The Plan will not have any impact on land or shoreline use that is incompatible with existing comprehensive plans, land use codes, or shoreline management plans Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: r None are proposed at this time. Actual facilities constructed to implement the Plan will be sited and constructed to avoid or reduce land use impacts. 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? This proposal should not create substantial new demands for transportation The protects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may create an increase in traffic near new District facilities but also reduce traffic by creating the opportunity for more students to walk to a closer school. The construction of the facilities included in the Capital Facilities Plan may result in minor increases in the demand for public services and utilities, such as fire and police protection, and water, sewer, and electric utilities None of these impacts are likely to be significant. The impacts on transportation and public services and utilities of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will ' be addressed during project-level review when appropriate. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are No measures to reduce or respond to such demands are proposed at this time. 7 Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment The Kent School District Capital Facilities Plan will not conflict with any laws or requirements for the protection of the environment 18 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2010 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN BOARD OF EDUCATION Suzanne Smith, President Tony Moore, Vice President Ed Barney, Director Amye Bronson-Doherty, Director Angela Griffin, Director SUPERINTENDENT Thomas R. Murphy Prepared by Sally D McLean Tanya Nascimento FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2010 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 2-3 SECTION 1 THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Introduction 4 Inventory of Educational Facilities 5 Inventory of Non-Instructional Facilities 6 Needs Forecast- Existing Facilities 7 Needs Forecast- New Facilities 8 Six Year Finance Plan 9 SECTION 2 MAPS OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES Introduction 11 Map - Elementary Boundaries 12 Map - Middle School Boundaries 13 Map - High School Boundaries 14 SECTION 3 SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION Introduction 15 Building Capacities 16-17 Portable Locations 18-19 Student Forecast 20-22 Capacity Summaries 23-27 King County Impact Fee Calculations 28-30 SECTION 4 SUMMARY OF CHANGES FROM THE 2009 31-33 PLAN 1 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2010 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN INTRODUCTION In response to the requirements of the State of Washington Growth Management Act (SHB)2929 (1990) and ESHB 1025 (1991)), and under the School impact Fee Ordinances of King County Code 21 A, City of Federal Way Ordinance No 95-249 effective December 21, 1995 as amended, City of Kent Ordinance No.3260 effective March 1996, and the City of Auburn Ordinance No. 5078 effective 1998, Federal Way Public Schools has updated its 2010 Capital Facilities Plan as of May 2009. This Plan is scheduled for adoption by King County, the City of Kent, City of Federal Way and the City of Auburn and is incorporated in the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction by reference. This plan is also included in the Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. To date, the City of Des Moines has not adopted a school impact fee ordinance The City of Des Moines collects school impact fees as part of the SEPA process The Growth Management Act requires the County to designate Urban Growth areas within which urban growth can be encouraged. The Growth Management Planning Council adopted and recommended to the King County Council four Urban Growth Area Line Maps with designations for urban centers A designation was made within the Federal Way planning area, which encompasses Federal Way Public Schools boundaries. King County will encourage and actively support the development of Urban Centers to meet the region's need for housing, jobs, services, culture, and recreation. This Plan's estimated population growth is prepared with this underlying assumption This Capital Facilities Plan will be used as documentation for any jurisdiction, which requires its use to meet the needs of the Growth Management Act. This plan is not intended to be the sole planning tool for all of the District needs The District may prepare interim plans consistent with Board policies or management need The District has prepared a multi-phase plan for the renovation and construction of Federal Way Schools and support buildings. The Board authorized presenting the $149 million bond on May 15, 2007. The bond, passed at 63 93%, will replace four elementary schools, Lakeland, Panther Lake, Sunnycrest and Valhalla and one middle school, Lakota Plans to replace Federal Way High School and Decatur High School and to increase capacity by approximately 400 students at each school are planned in later phases. Federal Way High School was built in 1938. It has been added onto at least 10 times and currently has an almost maze-like layout Based on an annual 4% increase in construction cost, the estimated cost to rebuild Federal Way High School is $122 million. Estimated construction costs will be re-calculated prior to the next bond election None of the cost to replace Federal Way or Decatur High School is included in the Impact Fee calculation in this Plan. 2 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2010 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN The non-instructional projects included in the plan will consolidate support services operations at a single location. The current Transportation and Maintenance facility cannot continue to meet the District needs in the future. Nutrition services and other administrative functions will also relocate to this centralized location. In September 2007 Woodmont Elementary School began a K-8 program by adding a 6'h grade and progressively adding a grade level each year In March 2008, the Board approved a second K-8 program at Nautilus Elementary School Nautilus began the 2008/09 school year with K-6'h grade As the program grows there will be more data available about the unique facility needs for this grade configuration. The District opened a new school in September 2008. The Technology Access Foundation (TAF) Academy will provide a small school setting for 6' through 12'h grade students. This academy is funded through a unique public/private partnership between the Technology Access Foundation and Federal Way Public Schools. The focus of the school is Science, Technology, Engineering and Math(STEM). The TAF Academy opened in September of 2008 with students in grades 6, 7 and 9 In the 2009/10 school year TAF Academy added 8`h and 10`h grade. Grades 11 and 12 will be added to successive years with a target population of about 350 The District continues to study school boundaries as new housing and fluctuating populations impact specific schools. Some shifts in boundaries may be required in the coming year. 3 1 1 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2010 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION I -THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN The State Growth Management Act requires that several pieces of information be gathered to determine the facilities available and needed to meet the needs of a growing community. This section provides information about current facilities, existing facility needs, and expected future facility requirements for Federal Way Public Schools. A Financial Plan that shows expected funding for any new construction, portables and modernization listed follows this. I ! ! C ! 4 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2010 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN ' INVENTORY OF EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS Adelaide 1635 SW 304th Street Federal Way 98023 Brigadoon 3601 SW 336th Street Federal Way 98023 Camelot 4041 S 298th Street Auburn 98001 Enterprise 35101 5th Avenue SW Federal Way 98023 Green Gables 32607 47th Avenue SW Federal Way 98023 Lake Dolloff 4200 S 308th Street Auburn 98001 Lake Grove 303 SW 308th Street Federal Way 98023 Lakeland 35827 32"d Avenue S Auburn 98001 Mark Twain 2450 S Star Lake Road Federal Way 98003 Meredith Hill 5830 S 300th Street Auburn 98001 Mirror Lake 625 S 314`h Street Federal Way 98003 Nautilus (K-8) 1000 S 289th Street Federal Way 98003 Olympic View 2626 SW 327th Street Federal Way 98023 Panther Lake 34424 1 st Avenue S Federal Way 98003 Rainier View 3015 S 368th Street Federal Way 98003 Sherwood Forest 34600 12th Avenue SW Federal Way 98023 Silver Lake 1310 SW 325th Place Federal Way 98023 Star Lake 4014 S 270th Street Kent 98032 Sunnycrest 24629 42"d Avenue S Kent 98032 Twin Lakes 4400 SW 320th Street Federal Way 98023 Valhalla 27847 42"6 Avenue S Auburn 98001 Wildwood 2405 S 300th Street Federal Way 98003 Woodmont(K-8) 26454 16th Avenue S Des Moines 98198 MIDDLE SCHOOLS Federal Way Public Academy (6-10) 34620 9`h Avenue S Federal Way 98003 Malice 36001 1st Avenue S Federal Way 98003 Kilo 4400 S 308th Street Auburn 98001 Lakota 1415 SW 314th Street Federal Way 98023 Sacajawea 1101 S Dash Point Road Federal Way 98003 Saghalie 33914 19th Avenue SW Federal Way 98023 Sequoyah 3450 S 3601h ST Auburn 98001 Totem 26630 40`h Ave S Kent 98032 TAF Academy(6-12) 26630 40`' Ave S Kent 98032 HIGH SCHOOLS Decatur 2800 SW 320th Street Federal Way 98023 Federal Way 30611 16th Avenue S Federal Way 98003 Thomas Jefferson 4248 S 288th Street Auburn 98001 Todd Beamer 35999 16th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Career Academy at Truman 31455 28th Ave S Federal Way 98003 ALTERNATIVE SCHOOLS Merit School 36001 1"Ave S Federal Way 98003 Internet Academy 31455 28`1 Ave S Federal Way 98003 5 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2010 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CURRENT INVENTORY NON-INSTRUCTIONAL FACILITIES Developed Property Administrative Building 31405 18th Avenue S Federal Way 98003 MOT Site 1066 S 320th Street Federal Way 98003 Central Kitchen 1344 S 308th Street Federal Way 98003 Federal Way Memorial Field 1300 S 308th Street Federal Way 98003 Leased Space Community Resource Center 1813 S Commons Federal Way 98003 Available Office Space 32020 ls`Ave S Federal Way 98003 Undeveloped Property Site# Location S75 SW 360th Street& 3rd Avenue SW—9.2 Acres 65 S 351st Street & 52nd Avenue S —8.8 Acres 60 E of 10th Avenue SW - SW 334th & SW 3351h Streets - 10.04 Acres 73 N of SW 3201h and east of 45"' PL SW — 23.45 Acres 71 S 344th Street & 46th Avenue S - 17.47 Acres 82 151 Way S and S 342"d St— Minimal acreage 96 S 308`h St and 141h Ave S — 36 Acres 81 S 332"d St and 9d' Ave S —20 Acres Notes: Not all undeveloped properties are large enough to meet school construction requirements. Properties may be traded or sold depending on what locations are needed to house students in the District. 6 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2010 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN NEEDS FORECAST - EXISTING FACILITIES i EXISTING FACILITY FUTURE NEEDS ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF FUNDS Purchase and Relocate Interim Capacity Anticipated source of funds is Portables Impact Fees Elementary Schools: Replace Existing Buildings Voter approved bonds. i Lakeland, Panther Lake, Increase capacity at Lakeland, Sunnycrest and Valhalla Panther Lake, Sunnycrest and Valhalla by a total of 200 seats Lakota Middle School Replace Existing Building Voter approved bonds Federal Way High School Replace Existing Building, Future bond authorization Increase Capacity Decatur High School Replace Existing Building, Future bond authonzation. Increase Capacity I The District is also planning the replacement of some non-instructional facilities. The District has purchased 20 acres (Site#81) for construction of consolidated facilities for support services functions. Transportation, Nutrition Services, Maintenance and other non-instructional functions will be housed at this centralized location. As part of the multi-phase plan, the District intends to increase capacity for high school students with expansion at the Decatur High School site Increased capacity at Federal Way High and at Decatur High in later phases supplant the need for construction of a fifth comprehensive high school 7 ' FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2010 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN ' NEEDS FORECAST- ADDITIONAL FACILITIES NEW FACILITY LOCATION ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF FUNDS No current plans for additional facilities. 8 000ao 00 a 0000 = � c 0 0 0 0o 0 0 j d� Hi 69 69 H�9 O. �5 O C O O N 0 0 0 0 0 O O C V J vl O\ 0 0 0 O Vi Yl O O vl �! m r 'O O^ FA 00 V� rO 69 P O\ V3 .^yt W ff s9 yj N Ei O Vi z No Ql N Y J Hl w � w � � � � NJr Oe p 4 L .y L '�, ^ ,,�' W O 9 v C N -C iy W _ QI E m ro O rq V V C Q v V IFiTI .0 N C Y ry G 0 n s (� 4.0 O C V T H O O O OOC ii v N ` 1 y L b d L Vl V] h VI W 0p y n n �cn E ^ R N R V GR 4 E ' L W C A aW�� O ✓1 a V� v � j Z � C v az R N —rCJ V A N `� `n CvC _ `!n v ry ., _ v ✓Vi E ,cOn y ,,ccV ,,GGvOi FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2010 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 1 SECTION 2 - MAPS OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES Federal Way Public Schools has twenty-one elementary schools (grades K-5), two schools with a K-8 grade configuration, seven middle school schools (grades 6-8), four high schools (grades 9-12) and three small secondary schools The Federal Way Public Academy serves students in grades 6-10. The TAF Academy serves students in grades 6- 12 who reside in the Totem Middle School service area The Career Academy at Truman High School serves students in grades 9-12. The Internet Academy serves grades K-I2. The following maps show the service area boundaries for each school, by school type. (Career Academy at Truman High School, Merit School, Internet Academy and Federal Way Public Academy serve students from throughout the District) The identified boundaries are reviewed annually Any change in grade configuration or adoption of programs that affect school populations may necessitate a change in school service areas. The Growth Management Act requires that a jurisdiction evaluate if the public facility infrastructure is in place to handle new housing developments In the case of most public facilities, new development has its major impact on the facilities immediately adjacent to that development. School District are different If the District does not have permanent facilities available, interim measures must be taken until new facilities can be built or until boundaries can be adjusted to match the population changes to the surrounding facilities. ' Adjusting boundaries requires careful consideration by the District and is not taken lightly It is recognized that there is a potential impact on students who are required to ' change schools. Boundary adjustments impact the whole district, not just one school It is important to realize that a single housing development does not require the construction of a complete school facility. School districts are required to project growth throughout the district and build or adjust boundaries based on growth throughout the district, not just around a single development ' 11 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2010 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL BOUNDARIES ❑ Elementary Schools ❑ Middle Schools ' I Adelaide 36 Federal Way Public Academy 2 Brigadoon 30Illahee 3 Camelot 31 Kilo 4 Enterprise 32 Lakota 5 Green Gables 33 Sacajawea 6 Lake Dolloff 34 Saghahe 7 Lake Grove 37 Sequoyah 8 Lakeland - 35 Totem 9 Mark Twain t 10 Meredith Hill E; High Schools - 11 Mirror Lake 40 Decatur ':`='T 12 Nautilus 41 Federal Way 13 Olympic View 421 Thomas Jefferson 14 Panther Lake 45 Todd Beamer 15 Rainier View 49 Career Academy at _ - 16 Sherwood Forest Truman — 17 Silver Lake ❑ Administrative 18 Star Lake Building - 19 Sunnycrest - _`� I 20 Twin Lakes Undeveloped Property 21 Valhalla - -i. 22 Wildwood i 23 Woodmont ❑ 112 43 4i a FL pul E _�, 1' �� . ' LL15� <_ S Y Lill]3 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2010 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN MIDDLE SCHOOL BOUNDARIES ❑ Elementary Schools ® Middle Schools 1 Adelaide 36 Federal Way Public Academy 2 Brigadoon 30lllahee 3 Camelot 31 Kilo 4 Enterprise 32 Lakota 5 Green Gables 33 Sacaiawea 6 Lake Dolloff 34 Saghahe 7 Lake Grove 37 Sequoyaht 8 Lakeland 35 Totem _ -- 1 '- «d 9 Mark Twain El High Schools 10 Meredith Hill 11 Mirror Lake 40 Decatur _' 12 Nautilus 41 Federal Way 13 Ol m is View 421 Thomas Jefferson Y P 45 Todd Beamer = 14 Panther Lake D= 15 Rainier View 49 Career Academy at �,� xr ��� r --t —� 1 16 Sherwood Forest TrumaniT y- 17 Silver Lake ❑ Administrative Building 18 Star Lake MOT Site -r x 4 7 19 Sunnycrest 20 Twin Lakes Undeveloped Propertyr ,ram -,n 21 Valhalla `` e 22 Wildwood 23 Woodmont f �`_ Za 74-4 _ --_, _-;,,f'`��. k� )g � t'tiE'�'-�_....���',•�r--�� ._`mot-,"._� "�� � rr � T'�r �,' , �r �"; t :> r ,l �I ,f -ter�� p FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2010 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN ' HIGH SCHOOL 'BOUNDARIES ❑ Elementary Schools ❑ Middle Schools 1 Adelaide 36 Federal Way Public Academy 2 Brigadoon 30Illahee 3 Camelot 31 Kilo 4 Enterprise 32 Lakota - 5 Green Gables 33 Sacajawea �- 6 Lake Dolloff 34 Sa hake ` 7 Lake Grove 37 Sequoyah 8 Lakeland 35 Totem - ' 9 Mark Twain � _ r 10 Meredith Hill High Schools =l I 1 Mirror Lake 40 Decatur F , t2 Nautilus 41 Federal Way 13 Olympic View 421 Thomas Jefferson 14 Panther Lake 45 Todd Beamer 15 Rainier View 49 Career Academy at ; j - _' 16 Sherwood Forest Truman 17Silver Lake h i © Administrative Building 18 Star Lake MOT Site �' I 19 Sunnycrest 20 Twin Lakes Undeveloped Property 21 Valhalla 22 Wildwood 23 Woodmont _ — - •,�� i , n ji Jr IN f N `. � 3 W E - _ _ y �: 1T = S In -- FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2010 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 3 - SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION Building Capacities - The Education Program Portable Locations ' Student Forecast—2010 through 2016 Capacity Summaries ' King County Impact Fees - Single and Multi-Family Units I 15 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2010 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Building Capacities This Capital Facilities Plan establishes the District's "standard of service" in order to ascertain the District's current and future capacity. The Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, but these guidelines do not take into consideration the education program needs. , In general, the District's current target class size provides that the average class size for a ' standard classroom for grades K through 2 should be 20 students In grades 3-5 the target is 25 students. For grades 6 to 12 the target class size is 26 students Classrooms for students with Individualized Education Program (Special Education) needs are calculated at 12 seats per classroom. Using the OSPI square footage calculation as a base line, the District has calculated a program capacity for all schools. A recent Study & Survey was the basis for changes to the OSPI building report The following list clarifies the adjustments to the OSPI calculation. Music Rooms: Each elementary school requires a standard classroom for music instruction. All Day Kindergarten: Every elementary school operates at least one all day Kindergarten program. These all ' day Kindergarten program require additional capacity because the standard classroom is available for one all day session rather than two half day sessions. The District will operate 52 sections of all day Kindergarten in 2009/10 Special Education Resource Rooms: Each elementary and middle school requires the use of a standard classroom(s)for special education students requiring instruction to address specific disabilities English as a Second Language Programs: Each elementary, middle school and high school requires the use of a standard classroom for students learning English as a second language. Middle School Computer Labs: Each middle school has computer labs. High School Career Development and Learning Center (Resource) Room: Each high school provides special education resource room and career development classrooms for students requiring instruction to address specific disabilities. 16 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2010 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITIES ELEMENTARY BUILDING MIDDLE SCHOOL BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY PROGRAM CAPACITY School Name Headcount School Name Headcount FTE Adelaide 372 Illahee 855 864 Brt adoon 327 Kilo 827 835 Camelot 269 Lakota 766 774 Enterprise 458 Saca awea 700 707 Green Gables 437 Saghalie 829 837 Lake Dolloff 433 Sequo yah 589 595 Lake Grove 323 Totem 714 721 Lakeland 392 Federal Way Public Academy 209 211 Mark Twain 327 Technology Access Foundation Academy** Meredith hill 453 2009 TO FNL 5,489 5,544 Mirror Lake 325 Nautilus 356 Olympic View 328 *Middle School Average 754 762 Panther Lake 383 Ranner View 432 HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING Sherwood Forest 423 PROGRAM CAPACITY Silver Lake 390 Star Lake 361 School Name leadcount FTE Sunnycrest 369 Decatur 1239 1,325 Twin Lakes 297 Federal Wav 1482 1,585 Valhalla 449 Thomas Jefferson 1339 1,432 Wildwood 317 Todd Beamer 1134 1,213 Woodmont 350 Career Academy at Truman 130 139 Federal Way Public Academy 109 117 2009 TOTAL 8,571 Technology Access Foundation Academy** 2009 TOTAL 5,433 S,811 Elementary Average 373 ' *Hi h School ANeraiae 1,299 1 1,389 Notes *Federal Way Public Academy and Career Academy at Truman High School are non-boundary schools These schools are not used in the calculated averages 1 **Technology Access Foundation Academy is housed entirely in portables on the Totem Middle School site 17 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2010 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN , Portable Locations , The Washington State Constitution requires the State to provide each student a basic education It is not an efficient use of District resources to build a school with a capacity for 500 students due to lack of space for 25 students when enrollment fluctuates throughout the year and from year to year. Portables are used as temporary facilities or interim measures to house students when , increasing population impacts a school attendance area. Portables may also be required to house students when new or changing programs require additional capacity They also provide temporary housing for students until permanent facilities can be financed and constructed When permanent facilities become available, the portable(s) is either used for other purposes such as storage or child care programs, or moved to another school for an interim classroom. Some portables may not be fit to move due to age or physical condition. In these cases, the District may choose to buy new portables and surplus these unfit portables It is the practice and philosophy of Federal Way Public Schools that portables are not acceptable as permanent facilities. The following page provides a list of the location of the portable facilities, used for temporary educational facilities by Federal Way Public Schools. 18 ' fFEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2010 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PORTABLE LOCATIONS PORTABLES LOCATED PORTABLES LOCATED AT ELEMEN FARY SCHOOLS AT HIGH SCHOOLS NON NON IN%TRUCfIONAI INYTRUCTIONU IN�TNUMONO IN4f RU(I]("'[ Adelaide 2 I Decatur 9 Bri adoon 1 Federal Way 2 1 Camelot 1 Thomas Jefferson t0 Enterprise 2 Todd Beamer 8 11 i Green Gables 1 TAF Academy 8 Lake Dolloff 1 1 TOTAL 37 2 Lake Grove I 1 ' Lakeland 2 Mark Twain 3 Meredith Hill 3 Mirror Lake 4 PORTABLES LOCATED Nautilus 1 AT SUPPORT FACILITIES Olympic View 2 Panther Lake MOT Rainier View 1 I TDC 5 Sherwood Forest 4 TOTAL 6 Silver Lake 2 2 Star Lake 3 l Sunnvcrest 2 HEAD START PORTABLES AT DISTRICT SITES Twin Lakes 2 1 Valhalla Sherwood Forest Wildwood 4 1 Woodmont 3 Total 1 TOTAL 43 11 PORTABLESLOCATED AT MIDDLE SCHOOLS NON INti I RUCTION(1 I NN I RI(f I(1N NI Illahee 3 Kilo 7 Lakota 4 Sacalawea 4 Saehahe 4 Se uoyah 1 1 Totem Merit 2 TAF Academy 6 1 28 4 19 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2010 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN , Student Forecast Student enrollment projections are a basic component of budget development. , Enrollment projections influence many of the financial estimates that go into budget preparation. The majority of staffing requirements are derived directly from the forecasted number of students Allocations for instructional supplies and materials are also made on the basis of projected enrollment. Other expenditures and certain revenue projections are directly related to enrollment projections Enrollment projections are completed annually in the Business Services Department. , Projections must be detailed at various levels, district total, school-building totals, grade level and program level to include vocational and special education students. The basis of projections has been cohort survival analysis. Cohort survival is the analysis , of a group that has a common statistical value (grade level) as it progresses through time. In a stable population the cohort would be 1 00 for all grades. This analysis uses historical information to develop averages and project the averages forward This method does not trace individual students; it is concerned with aggregate numbers in each grade level The district has used this method with varying years of history and weighted factors to study several projections. Because transfers in and out of the school system are , common, student migration is factored into the analysis as it increases or decreases survival rates. Entry grades (kindergarten) are a unique problem in cohort analysis. The district collects information on birth rates within the district's census tracts, and treats these statistics as a cohort for kindergarten enrollment in the appropriate years. The Federal Way School District is using various statistical methods for projecting student enrollments The resultant forecasted enrollments are evaluated below The first method is a statistical cohort analysis that produces ten distinct forecasts. These are forecast of enrollment for one year. The projections vary depending on the number of years of historical information and how they are weighted. A second method is a projection using an enrollment projection software package that , allows the user to project independently at school or grade level and to aggregate these projections for the district level. The Enrollment Master TM software provides statistical methods including trend line, standard grade progression (cohort) and combinations of these methods. This software produces a five-year projection of school enrollment In December 2006, the District contracted a demographer to develop projections for the Federal Way School District The report was complete in January 2007 The model used to forecast next year's enrollment uses cohort survival rates to measure grade to grade growth, assumes market share losses to private schools (consistent with county-wide average), assumes growth from new housing or losses due to net losses from migration. This forecast was provided as a range of three projections. The long-range forecast , provided with this report used a model with cohort survival rates and growth rates based on projected changes in the 5-19 age group for King County. Most of the methods used for long range enrollment reporting assume that enrollment is a constant percent of , 20 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2010 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN something else (e.g. population) or that enrollment will mirror some projected trend for the school-age population over time The report included 5 different calculations to provide a range of possible projections for the District to the year 2015 This model produces a projection that is between 23,000 and 24,000 when applied to the low, medium and high range modes This provides a reasonable range for long-range planning and is consistent with estimates from various models Long-range projections that establish the need for facilities are a modification of the cohort survival method The cohort method of analysis becomes less reliable the farther out the projections are made The Federal Way School District long-range projections are studied annually. The study includes information from the jurisdictional demographers as they project future housing and population in the region The long-range projections used by Federal Way Public Schools reflect a similar age trend in student populations as the projections published by the Office of Financial Management for the State of Washington Near term projections assume some growth from new housing, which is offset by current local economic conditions Current economic conditions do appear to be affecting enrollment. This is reflected in the District's projections The District tracks new development from five permitting jurisdictions Long range planning assumes a student yield from proposed new housing consistent with historical growth patterns Growth Management requires jurisdictions to plan for a minimum of twenty years. The Federal Way School District is a partner in this planning with the various jurisdictions comprising the school district geography These projections create a vision of the school district community in the future. 21 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2010 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Full Time Equivalent Enrollment History and Projections Simplified FTE(K Headcount= 5 FTE,Middle School FTE=99 Headcount, High School FTE= 935Headcount) , Total K-12 Percen[ Calendar Yr School Year Elementary Middle School Senior High FTE Change 2004 * 2003-04 9,127 5,524 6,408 21 059 2005 2004-05 9,164 5,473 6,515 21,152 0.4% 2006 2005-06 9,105 5,309 6,770 21,184 0.2% 2007 2006-07 9,022 5,261 6,754 21,037 -0.7% 2008 2007-09 8,912 5,167 6,637 20,716 -1.5% 2009 2008-09 8,865 5,155 6,456 20,476 -1.2% 2010 B2009-10 8,793 5,076 6,325 20,194 -1.4% 2011 P2010-11 8,838 5,077 6,167 20,082 -0.6010 2012 P2011-12 8,894 5,042 6,129 20,065 -0.1% 2013 P2012-13 8,988 4,995 6,109 20.092 0.1% 2014 P2013-14 9,091 4,969 6,111 20,171 04% 2015 P2014-15 9,175 5,012 6,066 20,253 0.4% 2016 P2015-16 9,253 5,086 6,022 20,361 0.5°% *New Configuration Elementary K-5 Middle School 6-8 High School9-12 Enrollment History and Six Year Forecast 22,000 21,000 20,000 c o �0 19,000 a d x 0 1 s,000 M V Q 17,000 , 16,000 15,000 , aa � � a00 O O0 0 a oA AO,00 O A"O, -Oa0) O�O)u A�O�v A�O 0 > 0 Q 0s J , �261 �> 0� 01 is OFTE School Year 22 ' FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2010 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Capacity Summaries All Grades, Elementary, Middle School, and High Schools 1 The Capacity Summaries combine Building Capacity information and the Student Forecast information The result demonstrates the requirements for new or remodeled facilities and why there is a need for the District to use temporary facilities or interim 1 measures The information is organized in spreadsheet format, with a page summarizing the entire District, and then evaluating capacity vs. number of students at elementary, middle school, and high school levels individually. 1 The notes at the bottom of each spreadsheet provide information about what facilities are in place each year. 1 1 ' 1 1 I 1 1 23 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2010 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARY-ALL GRADES , Budget Projected-- Calendar Year 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 CAPACITY School Year 2009/10 2010/1 l 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 BUILDING PROGRAM HEADCOUNT CAPACITY 19,493 19,493 19,493 19,593 19,593 19,593 19,593 FTE CAPACITY 19,926 19,926 19,926 20,026 20,026 20,026 20,026 Add or subtract changes to capacity Increase Capacity,Lakeland,Panther Lake , Surmycrest and Valhalla 100 100 Adjusted Program Headcount Capacity 19,593 19 493 19,593 19,593 19,593 19,593 19,593 Adjusted Program FTE Capacity 20,026 19,926 20,026 20,026 20,026 20,026 20,026 ENROLLMENT ' Basic FTE Enrollment 20,194 20,082 20 065 20,092 20,171 20,253 20,361 Internet Academy Enrollment(AAFTE) (315) (315) (315) (315) (315) (315) (315) Basic FTE Enrollment without Internet Academy 19,879" 19,767 19,750 19,777 19,856 19,938 20,046 SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) PROGRAM FTE CAPACITY 147 159 276 249 170 88 (20) RELOCATABLE CAPACITY , Current Portable Capacity 2,700 2,700 2,700 2,700 2,700 2,700 2.700 Deduct Portable Capacity (125) Add New Portable Capacity 125 Adjusted Portable Capacity 2,700 2,700 2,700 2,700 2,700 2,700 2,700 SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 2,847 2,859 2,976 2,949 2,870 2,788 2,680 24 fFEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2010 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARY-ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS Budget Projected-- Calendar Year 2010 2011 1 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 CAPACITY School Year 2009/10 2010%1 1 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 BUILDING PROGRAM HEAD COUNT CAPACITY 8,571 8,571 8,571 8,671 8,671 8,671 8,671 FTE CAPACITY 8,571 8,571 8,571 8,671 8,671 8,671 8,671 1 Increase Capacity Lakeland and Surm crest ]00 Adjusted Program Headcount Capacity 9,571 8,571 8,671 8,671 8,671 8,671 8,671 Adjusted Program FTE Capacity 8 571 8,571 8,671 8,671 8,671 8,671 8,671 ENROLLMENT Basic FTE Enrollment 8,793 8,838 8,894 8,988 9,091 9,175 9,253 2 Internet Academy(AAFTE) (36) (36) (36) (36) (36) (36) (36) Baste FTE Enrollment Nvithouf Yntemet tic ern 8,757 8,802 8,858 8,952 9,055 9,139 9,217 FSURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) PROGRAM CAPACITY 1 (186) (231) (187) (281) (384) (468) (546) RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 3 Current Portable Capacity 1,075 1,075 1,075 1,075 1,075 1,075 1, 1 Adjusted Portable Capacity �r' _ 11075 1,075 1,075 1,075 1,075 1,075 1,075 SURPLUS OR(LNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCArABLE CAPACITY 889 844 888 794 691 607 529 NOTES: 1 Increase Capacity at Lakeland, Panther Lake, Sunnycrest and Valhalla 2 Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities 3 Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available This is a calculated number only The actual number of portables that will be used will be based on actual student population needs The District may begin to pull portables from the instructional inventory Age and condition of the portables will determine feasibility for continued instructional use i 25 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2010 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN ' CAPACITY SUMMARY-MIDDLE SCHOOLS Budget Projected- Calendar - Calendar Year 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2010 CAPACITY School Year 2009/t0 2010/11 2011/12 2012113 20131,14 2014,1t5 2015/16 BUILDING PROGRAM HEADCOUNT CAPACITY 5,499 5,489 5,489 5,489 5,489 5,489 5,489 FTE CAPACITY M 5,544 5,544 5,544 5,544 5 544 5,544 5,544 Add or subtract changes in capacity Adjusted Program Headcount Capacity 5,489 5,489 5,489 5,489 1 5A89 5.489 5,489 Adjusted Program FTE Capacity 5,544 5,544 5,544 5,544 5,544 5,544 5,544 ENROLLMENT Banc FTE Enrollment 5,076 5,077 5,042 4,995 4,969 5,012 5,096 1 Internet Academy (AAFTE) (74) (74) (74) (74) (74) (74) (74) Basic FTE Enrollment without Internet Aca emy 5,002 5,003 4,968 4,921 4,895 4,938 5,012 SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) PROGRAM CAPACITY 542 541 576 623 649 606 532 RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 2 , Current Portable Capacity 825 725 725 725 725 725 725 Add/Subtract portable capacity Add new portable capacity Sequoyah 25 ' Subtract portable capacity from Totem (125) Adjusted Portable Capacity _ 725 725 725 725 725 725 725 SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 1,267 1,266 1,301 1,348 1,374 1,331 1,257 NOTES: 1. Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities , 2 Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available This is a calculated number only The actual number of portables that will be used will be based on actual student population needs The District may begin to pull portables from the instructional inventory Age and condition of the portables will determine feasibility for continued instructional use 26 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2010 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARY - HIGH SCHOOLS Budget Projected-- Calendar Year 2010 2011 1 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 CAPACITY School Year 2009/10 2010111 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 BUILDING PROGRAM HEADCOUNT CAPACITY 5,433 5,433 5,433 5,433 5,433 5,433 5,433 FTE CAPACITY f 5,811 5,811 5,811 5,811 5,811 5,811 5,811 Add or subtract changes in capacity Adjusted Program Headcount Capacity 5,433 5 433 5,433 5,433 5,433 5,433 5,433 Adjusted Program FTE Capacity 5,811 5,811 5,811 5,811 5,811 5,811 5,811 ENROLLMENT Banc FTE Enrollment 6,325 6,167 6,129 6,109 6,111 6,066 6,022 1 Internet Academy(AAFTE) (205) (205) (205) (205) (205) (205) (205) Baste Ed without Internet Academy 6,120 5,962 5,924 5,904 5 906 5,861 5,817 SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) PROGRAM CAPACITY (309) (151) (113) (93) (95) (50) (6) RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 2 Current Portable Capacity 800 900 900 900 900 900 900 Add/Subtract portable capacity Add portable capacity at TAF Academy 100 Adjusted Portable Capacity �'� 900 900 900 900 '900 900 900" SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE 3. CAPACITY 591 749 787 807 805 850 894 1 NOTES: 1 Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities 2 Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available This is a calculated number only The actual number of portables that will be used will be based on actual student population needs The District may begin to pull portables from the instructional inventory Age and condition of the portables will determine feasibility for continued instructional use 3 Capacity for unhoused students will be accommodated with traveling teachers and I no planning time in some classrooms Puget Sound Early College will house approximately 60 of the unhoused students 27 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2010 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN King County, the City of Federal Way, and the City of Kent Impact Fee Calculations Single and Multi-Family Residences Each jurisdiction that imposes school impact fees requires that developers pay these fees to help cover a share of the impact of new housing developments on school facilities To determine an equitable fee throughout unincorporated King County, a formula was established. This formula can be found in King County Code 21 A and was substantially adopted by the City of Federal Way and Kent. The formula requires the District to establish a "Student Generation Factor" which estimates how many students will be added to a school district by each new single or multi-family unit and to gather some standard construction costs, which are unique to that district - STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR ANALYSIS Federal Way Public Schools student generation factor was determined separately for single-family units and multi-family units. The factors used in the 2010 Capital Facilities Plan were derived using actual generation factors from single-family units that were constructed in the last five (5) years - IMPACT FEE CALCULATION Following the calculations for the student generation factor is a copy of the Impact Fee Calculation for single family and multi-family units based on King County Code 21A and the Growth Management Act ➢ Temporary Facility Cost is the average cost of a portable purchased within the last 12 months. Plan Year 2010 Plan Year 2009 Single Family Units $3,832 $4,017 Multi-Famity Units $2,114 $1,733 28 , C I� 000I- MOOn Iq N O N co O O) It — 0 0 0 c`') (7) O O LO A N COO CD Co O M M M M r ~ LL O O o o 0 0 , 0 0 0 O O _ O C i 0 O I— co O CON o O r W o 0 In O (- O CO CD (n V N j m O o O O N N O N N N N N LL O O O O O o 0 0 0 o O O O t C I� 0 0 Lo M m O O V m - O - (O -ItO ON N (D y j N N N O y LL O O O cc O O O O O O 9 C 4) O M O M N N M 0 0 , n 4) � O CON N (MD O R o M M dt M N m N V M Cl) F N V N N W y LL 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 o O O O O O O W r-i w O O O r p d (O S N O N Non)o � M N (7 COU) 0 E L 7 L 0 0 0 0 0 a Z = 2 O O a+ a m O O n O y L L O � 4Ci aN 4ai � Nrn (nM `n (D � °° Mr°)i y U) cco'T lin E N — m Cw o 000 0 p 4 y « » Y v o 0 0 0 0 r. a' C 2 N C ! p W z U O N O) N O N N Ln V) t0 9 4) a M O) M O M M - N M I� m c7 O O , N .M- U (Fj) z W E E O N W E 0 0 0 0 0 y 3 4) Z W fA Y 111 O — c a £ C � LL = O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L N 3 Co, � 3 ' a Z � � Q Q n Y Q i W wT £ d a � °° ( � 00 ( NLO0NIT Z C_ G C O 4) A � � a C F Q O_ N I Z W — 47 am c C m 0 o i _ o m o a o m W O LL' LL a) y O � C C C W N J a) Y 'O O G ca � '� CUa C -o — m m O O C 0 0 L O U 41 Z U U � a O O Z rnrnO4DC�r mcD0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2010 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 1 IMPACT FEE School Site Acquisition Cost: Student Student Facility Cost/ Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Acreage Acre Capacity SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary 0 3317 0 1520 SO $0 Middle School - 0 1653 00520 $0 $0 _., High School 02224 00590 $0 $0 TOTAL SO $0 School Construction Cost: Student Student , %Perm Fac/ Facility Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Total Sq Ft Cost Capacity SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary 95 62% S9,100,000 200 0 3317 0 1520 $14,431 S6,613 .................. ..... _... . Middle School 0 1653 0 0520 $0 $0 High School 0 2224 0 0590 $0 $0 TOTAL, $14,431 $6,613 Temporary Facility Cost: Student Student %Temp Fac Facility Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Total Sq Ft Cost Size SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary 03317 0 1520 Middle School 4 38% 5193,607 25 0 1653 00520 $SFi $18 _.... ................. ... ,.-- High School 02224. 0 0590 TOTAL $56 $18 State Matching Credit Calculation: Student Student Area Cost Sq Ft, State Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Allowance/Sq Ft Student Match SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary 5168 79 90 61 09% 0 3317 0 1520 S3,078 $1,411 Middle School $168 79 0 1653 00520 $0 $0 High School $168 79 02224 00590 $0 $0 Total $3,078 $1,411 Tax Pavment Credit Calculation SFR MFR Average Assessed Value (March 2009) $326,409 $86,497 Capital Bond Interest Rate(March 2009) 4 96% 4 96% Net Present Value of Average Dwelling 52,525.346 $669,206 Years Amortized 10 10 Property Tax Levy Rate $1 48 $1 48 Present Value of Revenue Stream $3,745 $992 Single Family Multi-Family Residences Residences Mitigation Fee Summary Site Acquisition Cost $ - S - Permanent Facility Cost $ 14,431 S 6,613 Temporary Facility Cost S 56 S 18 State Match Credit S (3,078) S (1,411) Tax Payment Credit S (3,745) S (992) Sub-Total S 7,664 S 4,228 50%Local Share S 3,832 $ 2,114 illtmpact Fee $ 3,832 $ 2,1 44 30 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2010 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 4 SUMMARY OF CHANGES FROM THE 2009 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN IThe 2010 Capital Facilities Plan is an updated document, based on the 2009 Capital Facilities Plan. The changes between the 2009 Plan and the 2010 Plan are listed below. SECTION I - THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN t SIX-YEAR FINANCE PLAN The Six Year Finance Plan has been rolled forward to reflect 2010/2016 SECTION III - SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION CAPACITY Elementary capacity includes space for All Day Kindergarten programs at every elementary school. Changes to the Building Program Capacities calculation are found on page 17. PORTABLES The fist of portables reflects the movement of portables between facilities or new portables purchased. Portable Locations can be found on page 19. STUDENT FORECAST The Student Forecast now covers 2010 through 2016 Enrollment history and projections are found on page 22 CAPACITY SUMMARY 1 The changes in the Capacity Summary are a reflection of the changes in the capacities and student forecast New schools and increased capacity at current buildings are shown as increases to capacity Capacity Summaries are found on pages 24-27 IMPACT FEE CALCULATION - KING COUNTY CODE 21A The Impact Fee Calculations have changed due to changes in several factors. The adjustment made in the Impact Fee Calculation, causing a change in the Impact Fee between the 2009 Capital Facilities Plan and the 2010 Capital Facilities Plan can be 1 found on page 32 and 33 31 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2010 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN IMPACT FEE CALCULATION CHANGES FROM 2009 TO 2010 STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS Student Generation factors are based on rates for new developments constructed over a period of not more than five years prior to the date of the fee calculation. The changes in student Generation factors between the 2009 Capital Facilities Plan and the 2010 Capital Facilities Plan are due to developments that were deleted or added based upon the age of the developments and the year placed in the survey. The Student Generation worksheet is found on page 29. SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION COSTS The anticipated cost for replacing Lakeland, Panther Lake, Sunnycrest and Valhalla is $70,000,000 The replacement will add 50 new seats to the school capacity at each building The total capacity at these four elementary schools is currently 1505. Adding 200 additional seats will increase the capacity by 13%. Total Cost .13 X $70,000,000= $9,100,000 The District will use the above formula created as a base from the 2008 Capital Facilities Plan for the 2010 Capital Facilities Plan The capacity of the four elementary schools may vary from year to year as programs are added or changed and construction cost may increase overtime For instance, for each new all day Kindergarten program, the building capacity will effectively be reduced by 20 headcount and the Board authorized an increase in construction cost of S 1 in for Valhalla. These changes would increase the construction cost The District is using the base formula established in the 2008 plan in the Impact Fee calculation. 32 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2010 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN IMPACT FEE CALCULATION CHANGES FROM 2009 TO 2010 IMPACTFEE Item From/To Comment Percent of Permanent Facilities 96.81% to 95.62% Report#3 OSPI Percent Temporary Facilities 3.19% to 4.38% Updated portable inventory Average Cost of Portable $168,307 to $193,607 Updated average of portables Classroom purchased and placed in 2009 Area Cost Allowance $168.79 to $168.79 No change from the prior year. State Match 61 84% to 61.09% Change effective July 2008 Average Assessed Value SFR— Per Puget Sound Educational $297,242 to $326,409 Service District (ESD 121) MFR— $68,998 to $86,497 Capital Bond Interest Rate 5.11% to 4.96% Market Rate IProperty Tax Levy Rate $1.49 to $1.48 King County Treasury Division ' Single Family Student Yield Updated Housing Inventory Elementary .3285 to .3317 1 Middle School .1631 to .1653 High School .2446 to .2224 Multi-Family Student Yield Updated Housing Inventory Elementary .1222 to .1520 Middle School .0621 to .0520 High School .0942 to .0590 33 i ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAC 197-11-960 Environmental Checklist. Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. t Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge In most cases,you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact 1 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: IComplete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply" In addition, complete the Supplemental Sheet for nonproject actions (part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. l 1 1 l � 1 it 2 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: The adoption of a Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan by the Federal Way School District No. 210 for , the purposes of planning for the District's facilities needs The King County, City of Federal Way, City of Kent and the City of Auburn's Comprehensive Plan will be amended to include the District's 2010 Capital Facilities Plan in the Capital Facilities Plan Element This project may also involve the amendment of the Comprehensive Plans of the city of Des Moines to incorporate the District's 2010 Capital Facilities Plan. 2. Name of applicant: Federal Way School District No. 210. 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Federal Way School District No 210 31405 18th Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 (253) 945-2000 Contact Person: Ms Tanya Nascimento Enrollment and Demographics Telephone: (253) 945-2071 4. Date checklist prepared: April 18, 2009 5. Agency requesting checklist- Federal Way School District No. 210 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): The Federal Way School District's 2010 Capital Facilities Plan is scheduled to be adopted by the District in May 2009 The Capital Facilities Plan will be forwarded to King County, the City of Federal Way, City of Kent and the City of Auburn for inclusion in each jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan. It will also be forwarded to the city of Des Moines for possible inclusion in this jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plans The District will continue to update the Capital Facilities Plan annually. The projects included in the Capital Facthttes Plan have been or will be subject to project-specific environmental review. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal9 If yes, explain. I 3 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST The Capital Facilities Plan sets forth the capital improvement projects that the District plans to implement over the next six years. These include construction of four elementary schools, Lakeland, Panther Lake, Sunnycrest and Valhalla. This plan also includes construction of Lakota Middle School Additionally the plan covers the purchase and siting of temporary facilities at various locations Non-instructional projects included in the plan will consolidate support services operations at a single location. This will include the construction of new facilities to L house the Transportation, Maintenance and Nutrition Services departments. Current plans are for all the projects to be complete by 2013. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will undergo additional environmental review, when appropriate, as they are developed. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal9 If yes, explain. Permits will be applied for with the appropriate jurisdiction for siting the temporary facilities and for the construction of Lakeland and Sunnycrest Elementary Schools during the 2009 calendar year. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. I The District anticipates that King County, the City of Federal Way, the City of Kent and the city of Auburn will adopt this Capital Facilities Plan into their Comprehensive Plan The city of Des Moines may also adopt this Capital Facilities Plan into the Capital Facilities Elements of their Comprehensive Plans (when issued) 11. Give a brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description ) This is a non-project action. This proposal involves the adoption of the Federal Way School District's 2010 Capital Facilities Plan for the purpose of planning the District's facilities needs The District's Capital Facilities Plan will be incorporated into King County's, the City Federal I Ways, the City of Kent's and the City of Auburn's Comprehensive Plans. It may also be incorporated into the Comprehensive Plans of the city of Des Moines The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject to project-specific environmental review. A copy of the Capital Facilities Plan may be viewed at the District's offices. 4 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 12. Location of the proposal Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s) Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The Capital Facilities Plan wilt affect the Federat Way School District The District includes an area of approximately 35 square miles The City of Federal Way, parts of the cities of Kent, Des Moines and Auburn, parts of unincorporated King County, fall within the District's boundaries. A detailed map of the District's boundaries can be viewed at the District's offices. t t j � t t t I 5 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other The Federal Way School District is comprised of a variety of topographic land forms and gradients Specific topographic characteristics of the sites at which the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan are located have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Specific slope characteristics at the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Specific soil types found at the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe Unstable soils may exist within the Federal Way School District Specific soil limitations on individual project sites have been or will be identified at the time of project-level environmental review when appropriate. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed Indicate source of fill Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject, when appropriate, to project-specific environmental review and local approval at the time of proposal. Proposed grading projects, as well as the purpose, type, quantity, and source of any fill materials to be used have been or will be identified at that time. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use" If so, generally describe. It is possible that erosion could occur as a result of the construction projects currently proposed in the Capital Facilities Plan The erosion impacts of the individual projects have been or will be evaluated on a site-specific basis at the time of project-specific environmental review when appropriate. Individual projects have been or will be subject to local approval processes. 6 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings?) The proposed renovation projects will require the construction of impervious surfaces. The extent of any impervious cover constructed will vary with each capital facilities project included in the Capital Facilities Plan This issue has been or will be addressed during project- specific environmental review when appropriate h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: , The erosion potential of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan and appropriate control measures have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. Relevant erosion reduction and control requirements will be met 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i e , dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Various emissions, many construction-related, may result from the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan. The air-quality impacts of each project have been or will be evaluated during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal9 If so, generally describe. Any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any The individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject to project-specific environmental review when appropriate and relevant local approval processes. The District will be required to comply with all applicable air regulations and air permit requirements Proposed measures specific to the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review w when appropriate. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 7 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 3. Water a. Surface. l) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)" If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. There is a network of surface water bodies within the Federal Way School District. The surface water bodies that are in the immediate vicinity of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. When necessary, the surface water regimes and flow patterns have been or will be researched and incorporated into the designs of the iindividual projects. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the 1 described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may require work near the surface waters located within the Federal Way School District Applicable local approval requirements have been or will be satisfied. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected Indicate the source of fill material Information with respect to the placement or removal of fill and dredge material as a component of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be provided during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. Applicable local regulations have been or will be satisfied. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions" Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Any surface water withdrawals or diversions required in connection with the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project- specific environmental review when appropriate. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplam9 If so, note location on the site j plan Each project included in the Capital Facilities Plan, if located in a floodplain area, will be required to meet applicable local regulations for flood areas. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge 8 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Specific information regarding the discharge of waste materials that may be required as a result of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be provided during project-specific environmental review when appropriate Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. b. Ground• 1) Will groundwater be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may impact groundwater resources. The impact of the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan on groundwater resources has been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate Each project is or will be subject to applicable local regulations. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage, industrial, containing the following chemicals . . , agricultural; etc). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve The discharges of waste material that may take place in connection with the projects included in the Plan have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review. c. Water Runoff(including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Individual projects included to the Capital Facilities Plan may have storm water runoff consequences. Specific information regarding the storm water impacts of each project has been or will be provided during project-specific environmental review when appropriate Each project is or will be subject to applicable local storm water regulations r 9 � ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may result in the discharge of waste materials into ground or surface waters. The specific impacts of each project on ground and surface waters have been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. Each project is or will be subject to all applicable regulations regarding the discharge of waste materials into ground and surface waters Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Specific measures to reduce or control runoff impacts associated with the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. 4. Plants: a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree. fir, cedar,pine, other shrubs grass pasture _ crop or gram _ wet soil plants- cattail, buttercup,bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation ' A variety of vegetative zones are located within the Federal Way School District. Inventories of the vegetation located on the sites of the projects proposed in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be developed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Some of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may require the removal or alteration of vegetation The specific impacts on vegetation of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. The specific impacts to these species from the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be determined during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. i10 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plans, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any. Measures to preserve or enhance vegetation at the sites of the projects included to the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review when appropriate Each project is or will be subject to applicable local landscaping requirements 5. Animals- a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site- birds hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other mammals- deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish bass, salmon, trout,herring, shellfish, other: An inventory of species that have been observed on or near the sites of the projects proposed in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be developed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Inventories of threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be developed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. The impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan on migration routes have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Appropriate measures to preserve or enhance wildlife have been or will be determined during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. r 11 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 6. Energy and Natural Resources: a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. The State Board of Education requires the completion of a life cycle cost analysis of all heating, lighting, and insulation systems before it will permit specific school projects to proceed The energy needs of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be determined at the time of specific engineering and site design planning when Lappropriate Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties9 If so, generally describe The impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan on the solar potential of adjacent projects have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Energy conservation measures proposed in connection with the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be considered during project-specific environmental review when appropriate 7. Environmental Health: a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any- The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will comply with all current codes, standards, rules, and regulations. Individual projects have been or will be subject to project-specific environmental review and local approval at the time they are developed when appropriate. � � 12 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST b. Noise: 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example traffic, equipment, operation, other)? A variety of noises from traffic, construction, residential, commercial and industrial areas exists within the Federal Way School District The specific noise sources that may affect the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review when appropriate 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example. traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. The District does not anticipate that the projects will create long-term increases in traffic- related or operations-related noise levels. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any- The projected noise impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be evaluated and mitigated during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. Each project is or will be subject to applicable local regulations. 8. Land and Shoreline Use: a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? There are a variety of land uses within the Federal Way School District, including residential, commercial, industrial, institutional, utility, open space, recreational, etc. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. The project sites covered under the Capital Facilities Plan have not been used recently for agriculture. c. Describe any structures on the site The structures located on the proposed sites for the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified and described during project-specific environmental review when appropriate 13 � � ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? The remodeling and renovation projects will require the demolishment of school structures. The structures that will be demolished as a result of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? The sites that are covered under the Capital Facilities Plan have a variety of zoning classifications under the applicable zoning codes Site-specific zoning information has been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review when appropriate f What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Inventories of the comprehensive plan designations for the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be completed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Shoreline master program designations of the sites of the projects included in the Capital 1 Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area'? If so, specify Any environmentally sensitive areas located on the sites of the projects included in the Plan have been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? The Federal Way School District currently serves approximately 22,200 students. The student population is expected to increase to 23,000 by the year 2015 This projection has been adjusted to reflect the current economic conditions. The District employs approximately 3,200 people. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Any displacement of people caused by the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be evaluated during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. However, it is not anticipated that the Capital Facilities Plan, or any of the projects contained therein, will displace any people. 14 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be subject to project-specific environmental review and local approval when appropriate. Proposed mitigating measures will be proposed at that time, if necessary. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The compatibility of the specific projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan with existing uses and plans has been or will be assessed as part of the comprehensive planning process and during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. 9. Housing: a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing No housing units would be provided in connection with the completion of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. I It is not anticipated that the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will eliminate any housing units. The impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan on existing housing have been or will be evaluated during project-specific environmental review when appropriate c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Measures to reduce or control any housing impacts caused by the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate 10. Aesthetics: a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s)proposed9 The aesthetic impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. 15 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? The aesthetic impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be determined during project-specific environmental review when appropriate c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any. Appropriate measures to reduce or control the aesthetic impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be determined on a project-specific basis when appropriate. t11. Light and Glare: a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? The light or glare impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? The light or glare impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Off-site sources of light or glare that may affect the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be evaluated during project-specific environmental review when appropriate d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Proposed measures to mitigate light and glare impacts have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. 12. Recreation. a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? There are a variety of formal and informal recreational facilities within the Federal Way School District. 16 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. The recreational impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan, including proposed renovated school and support facilities, may enhance recreational opportunities and uses. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any. Adverse recreational effects of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject to mitigation during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. A school site usually provides recreational facilities to the community in the form of play fields and gymnasiums. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation: a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site" If so, generally describe. There are no known places or objects listed on, or proposed for such registers on the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan. The existence of historic and cultural resources on or next to the sites has been or will be addressed in more detail during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. An inventory of historical sites at or near the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be developed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Appropriate measures have been or will be proposed on a project-specific basis when appropriate. 14. Transportation: a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The impact on public streets and highways of the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. 17 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? The relationship between the specific projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan and public transit has been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate9 An inventory of parking spaces located at the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan and the impacts of specific projects on parking availability has been or will be conducted during project-specific environmental review when appropriate ' d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private) The need for new streets or roads, or improvements to existing streets and roads has been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation9 If so, generally describe. Use of water, rail, or air transportation has been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. f How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project9 If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur The traffic impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: The mitigation of traffic impacts associated with the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate 15. Public Services: a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection,police protection, health care, schools, other)9 If so, generally describe. The District does not anticipate that the projects identified in the Capital Facilities Plan will substantially increase the need for other public services. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. 18 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Remodeled/renovated school or facilities will be built with automatic security systems, fire alarms, smoke alarms, heat sensors, and sprinkler systems. 16. Utilities: a. Circle utilities currently available at the site. electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. Electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, and sanitary sewer utilities are available at the sites of the projects proposed in the Capital Facilities Plan The types of utilities available at specific project sites have been or will be addressed in more detail during project- specific environmental review when appropriate. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Utility revisions and construction needs have been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature Date Submitted: April 16, 2008 I 19 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented Respond briefly and in general terms 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances, or production of noise? To the extent the Capital Facilities Plan makes it more likely that school facilities will be constructed and/or renovated and remodeled, some of these environmental impacts will be more likely Additional impermeable surfaces, such as roofs, parking lots, sidewalks, access roads, and playgrounds could increase storm water runoff, which could enter surface or ground waters Heating systems, emergency generators, and other school equipment that is installed pursuant to the Capital Facilities Plan could result in air emissions. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan should not require the production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances, with the possible exception of the storage of diesel fuel or gasoline for emergency generating equipment The District does not anticipate a significant increase in the production of noise from its facilities, although the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will increase the District's student capacities. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Proposed measures to mitigate any such increases described above have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate Storm water detention and runoff will meet applicable County and/or City requirements and may be subject to National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ("NPDES") permitting requirements Discharges to air will meet applicable air pollution control requirements. Fuel oil will be stored in accordance with local and state requirements. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? The Capital Facilities Plan itself will have no impact on these elements of the environment. These impacts have been or will be addressed in more detail during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. The projects included in the Plan are not likely to generate severe impacts on fish or marine life. 20 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are Specific measures to protect and conserve plants, animals, and fish cannot be identified at this time Specific mitigation proposals have been or will be identified, however, during project- specific environmental review when appropriate 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? The construction of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will require the consumption of energy. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be constructed in accordance with applicable energy efficiency standards. 4 How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands" The Capital Facilities Plan and individual projects contained therein should have no impact on these resources. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: Appropriate measures have been or will be proposed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate Updates of this Plan will be coordinated with King County and the cities of Federal Way, Kent, Des Moines, and Auburn as part of the Growth Management Act process, one of the purposes of which is to protect environmentally sensitive areas. To the extent the District's facilities planning process is part of the overall growth management planning process, these resources are more likely to be protected 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shorelme uses incompatible with existing plans? The Capital Facilities Plan will not have any impact on land or shoreline use that is incompatible with existing comprehensive plans, land use codes, or shoreline management plans The District does not anticipate that the Capital Facilities Plan or the projects contained therein will directly affect land and shoreline uses in the area served by the District. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: No measures to avoid or reduce land use impacts resulting from the Capital Facilities Plan or the projects contained therein are proposed at this time. 21 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may create temporary increases in the District's need for public services and utilities. Upon the completion of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan, however, the District does not anticipate that Its need for public services and utilities will increase substantially beyond existing levels. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: No measures to reduce or respond to such demands are proposed at this time. 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment The Capital Facilities Plan will not conflict with any laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. i t 1 1 i I 1 22 Kent City Council Meeting Date November 17, 2009 Item No. 6A - 6B CONSENT CALENDAR 6. City Council Action: Councilmember ��V6 moves, Councilmember l.Xa"LIK seconds to approve Consent Calendar Items A through E. Discussion Action 6A. Approval of Minutes. Approval of the minutes of the regular Council meeting of November 3, 2009. 6B. Approval of Bills. Approval of payment of the bills received through October 15 and paid on October 15 after auditing by the Operations Committee on October 20, 2009. Approval of checks issued for vouchers: Date Check Numbers Amount 10/15/09 Wire Transfers 3907-3922 $2,186,248.00 10/15/09 Regular Checks 636729-637337 2,417,886.00 Use Tax Payable 3,124.10 ' $4,607,258.10 Approval of checks issued for payroll for October 1 through October 15 and paid on October 20, 2009: Date Check Numbers Amount 10/20/09 Checks 314546-314782 $ 181,891.79 10/20/09 Advices 256658-257436 1,664,847.32 $1,846,739.11 i E 1 Kent City Council Meeting K E N T N/qS NINGTON November 3, 2009 The regular meeting of the Kent City Council was called to order at 5:00 p.m. by Mayor Cooke. Counalmembers present: Albertson (who arrived at 5:05 p.m.), Clark, Danielson, Harmon, Ranniger, Raplee, and Thomas. (CFN-198) CHANGES TO THE AGENDA A. From Council, Administration, Staff. (CFN-198) No changes were made. B. From the Public. (CFN-198) No changes were requested. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS A. Public Recognition. (CFN-198) There were no items for public recognition. B. Community Events. (CFN-198) Ranniger invited everyone to attend the Holiday Craft Bazaar at the Senior Center on November 6 and 7. CONSENT CALENDAR Raplee moved to approve Consent Calendar Items A through K. Clark seconded and the motion carried. A. Approval of Minutes. (CFN-198) Minutes of the regular Council meeting of October 20, 2009, were approved. B. Approval of Bills. (CFN-104) Payment of the bills received through October 15 and paid on October 15 after auditing by the Operations Committee on October 20, 2009, was approved. Approval of checks issued for vouchers: Date Check Numbers Amount 10/15/09 Wire Transfers 3907-3988 $2,186,248.00 10/15/09 Regular Checks 636729-637337 2,417,886.00 Use Tax Payable 3,124.10 $4,607,258.10 Checks issued for payroll for October 1 through October 15 and paid on October 20, 2009, were approved: Date Check Numbers Amount 10/20/09 Checks 314546-314782 $ 181,891.79 10/20/09 Advices 256658-257436 1,664,847.32 $1,846,739.11 C. 2010 Community Development Block Grant Action Plan. (CFN-118) The Proposed 2010 Community Development Block Grant Action Plan, including funding allocations and contingency plans was approved, and the Mayor was authorized to execute the appropriate certifications and agreements. i1 Kent City Council Minutes November 3, 2009 D. Third Ouarter Fee-In-Lieu Funds. (CFN-118) The $29,913 in fee-in-lieu funds for the third quarter of 2009 was accepted, and the expenditure of funds in Wilson Playfields Acquisition and Development budget was authorized. E. Federal Department of Justice Grant for Safe Havens Program. (CFN-118) ' The $250,000 grant from the Federal Department of Justice was accepted, the expenditure of funds in the Safe Havens Budget was approved, and the Mayor was authorized to sign the agreement contingent upon an agreement with the office on Violence Against Women (OVW) to allow the City to end the project early, or transition the project to a nonprofit. F. Parking Code Revision Ordinance. (CFN-171) Ordinance No. 3934 amending Kent City Code Section 9.38.045 to prohibit parking from 10:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. on both sides of South 203rd Street, from 100th Avenue SE, westerly approximately 600 feet to the westerly boundary of Chestnut Ridge Park was adopted. G. HWA Geo Sciences Consultant Contract. (CFN-1038) The Mayor was authorized to sign a consultant contract between the City of Kent and HWA Geo Sciences in the amount of $38,149, for the purpose of providing materials testing and inspection services related to the 2"d Avenue Pedestrian Improvements Project. H. 2010 Operating Budget. (CFN-186) November 17, 2009, was set as the date for the second public hearing on the 2010 Operating Budget at the regular City Council meeting. I. 2010-2015 Capital Improvement Plan. (CFN-775) November 17, 2009, was set as the date for the second public hearing on the 2010-2015 Capital Improvement Plan at the regular City Council meeting. J. 2009 Tax Levy for 2010 Budget. (CFN-104) November 17, 2009, was set as the date for the public hearing on the 2009 Tax Levy for the 2010 budget at the regular City Council meeting. K. Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Update to Chapter 12.13 Kent City Code. (CFN-775,961,1000) November 17, 2009, was set as the date for a public hearing to consider amendment of the Capital Facilities Element of the Kent Comprehensive Plan and amendment of Chapter 12.13 of the Kent City Code to incorporate the updated Capital Facilities Plans of the Auburn, Kent and Federal Way School Districts, the City's 2010-2015 Capital Improvement Plan, and changes to adopted school impact fees. OTHER BUSINESS A. WebSolutions Technology Inc Consultant Services Agreement. (CFN-818) Testing of the City's Web site uncovered usability issues which cannot be fixed effectively without a redesign of the web site. Funding for the project was approved in the 2008 Technology Plan. Clark moved to authorize the Information Technology Department to execute a Consultant Services Agreement with WebSolutions Technology, Inc. and to authorize the Mayor to sign all documents related to the agreement in an amount not to exceed $59,700. Raplee seconded and the motion carried. 2 Kent City Council Minutes November 3, 2009 B. Howard Hanson Dam/Green River Levee Update. (CFN-1318) Acting Public Works Director LaPorte announced that City crews and contractors have completed the installation of 17,000 sandbags along 12 miles of river, and displayed photo- graphs. He noted that this work was completed two days early, and outlined upcoming work to protect other locations. He then answered questions from Council- members regarding security of the sandbags and the reimbursement of funds. BIDS A. 2"d Avenue Pedestrian Improvements. (CFN-1038) The bid opening for this project was held on October 21, 2009, with fifteen bids received. The low responsive bid was submitted by Road Construction NW, Inc. in the amount of $279,156, and the Acting Public Works Director recommends award of the contract to them. Raplee moved to authorize the Mayor to sign a contract for the 2"d Avenue Pedestrian Improvements project with Road Construction NW, Inc., in the amount of $279,156. Harmon seconded and the motion carried. REPORTS A. Council President. (CFN-198) No report was given. B. Mayor. (CFN-198) Mayor Cooke noted that the 2010 Preliminary Budget has been distributed to Councilmembers and that it will be available online at )/vww choosekent.com. She also noted that the Department of Transportation is holding a meeting tonight to receive public input on toll lanes. C. Operations Committee. (CFN-198) City Attorney Brubaker explained that businesses in the valley are having a problem obtaining flood protection insurance because of the threat of flooding. He said the state legislature is considering forming a joint underwriting association which would create a program to make insurance available to those businesses. He noted that this was discussed by the Operations Committee today and that they authorized preparation of a draft resolution urging the State legislature to form the association, which will go to Council on November 17. D. Parks and Human Services Committee. (CFN-198) No report was given. E. Planning and Economic Development Committee. (CFN-198) No report was given. F. Public Safety Committee. (CFN-198) No report was given. G. Public Works Committee. (CFN-198) No report was given. H. Administration. (CFN-198) No report was given. CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS ADDED ITEM A. Safe Havens Funding. (CFN-118) Beth Falanga praised the work of Safe Havens and urged the Council to accept grant funding in order to continue the program. 3 Kent City Council Minutes November 3, 2009 ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 5:30 p.m. (CFN-198) Brenda Jacober, CMC City Clerk 4 Kent City Council Meeting ' Date November 17, 2009 Category Consent Calendar - 6C 1. SUBJECT: WASHINGTON TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION GRANT - ACCEPT 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Accept the grant award from the Washington Traffic Commission Grant in an amount not to exceed $6,000 and authorize the Police Chief to sign all the necessary documents. The funds will provide sustained overtime funding for DUI enforcement patrols. The campaign entitled, "X-52: Drive Hammered Get Nailed" multi-jurisdictional patrols will begin on November 19th and run through September 6, 2010. Funding is on a reimbursement basis. 3. EXHIBITS: None 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Safety Committee 11/10/09 (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? Y Revenue? Y Currently in the Budget? Yes _ No X 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Kent City Council Meeting Date November 17, 2009 Category Consent Calendar - 6D 1. SUBJECT: FIRE PREVENTION INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT - AUTHORIZE 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Authorize the Mayor to sign the interlocal agreement between the Cities of Kent and Covington relating to fire prevention. The purpose of this Agreement is to establish the framework to effectuate Covington's desire to have Kent perform fire prevention services. To that end, Kent hereby will perform for payment the following services for Covington: • Fire Code Administration 1 • Administration of Fire Prevention Programs • Plan Review and Inspections Pursuant to the International Fire Code • Pro-active techniques to reduce the occurrence of arson • Inspections Associated with Business Licensing • Approval of Placement of Hydrants • Origin and Cause Investigations • Criminal Investigations Limited to Arson and Other Related Crimes In consideration of this Agreement and the services provided, Covington will pay Kent an hourly rate of $140 for each hour of work performed by the Fire Marshal and $118 an hour for all other sworn personnel. At the end of each quarter, Kent will invoice Covington for the services provided. Each year the hourly rates will be increased by the amount equal to the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton. The Agreement is subject to final terms and conditions acceptable to the City Attorney. 3. EXHIBITS: Interlocal Agreement 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Safety Committee 11/10/09 (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? Revenue? Yes Currently in the Budget? Yes _ No X 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITIES OF KENT AND COVINGTON RELATING TO FIRE PREVENTION SERVICES THIS INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is entered into between the CITY OF KENT ("Kent"), and the CITY OF COVINGTON ("Covington"). WHEREAS, Kent and Covington are public agencies as defined by Ch. 39.34 of the Revised Code of Washington ("RCW"), and are authorized to enter into interlocal agreements on the basis of mutual advantage and thereby to provide services and facilities in the manner and pursuant to forms of governmental organization that will accord best with geographic, economic, population, and other factors influencing the needs of local communities; and WHEREAS, Kent's Fire Department maintains a professional fire prevention division that regularly conducts inspections, plan reviews, and fire investigations; and WHEREAS, Covington desires to utilize the resources of Kent to assist Covington in managing Covington's fire prevention services, and WHEREAS, Covington has agreed to compensate Kent for conducting such services; and WHEREAS, Kent and Covington find the working relationship established under previous interlocal agreements to be mutually beneficial to both parties and wish to continue this relationship, NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms and provisions contained herein, it is agreed between Kent and Covington as follows: 1. Purpose. It is the purpose of this Agreement to establish the framework to effectuate Covington's desire to have Kent perform the services required to create and maintain the Covington Fire Prevention Bureau To that end, 1 Kent hereby agrees to perform for payment the following services for Covington: 1.1 Fire Marshal Administrative Services 1.1.1 Fire Code Administration, 1 1.2 Administration of Fire Prevention Programs; 1.2 International Fire Code (IFC) Services 1.2.1 Inspections pursuant to the IFC; 1.2.2 Plan reviews pursuant to the IFC; 1.2.3 Inspections associated with business licensing; and 1.2.4 Approval of hydrant placements 1.3 Fire Investigative Services 1 3.1 Origin and cause investigations; 1.3.2 Criminal investigations limited to arson and other related crimes, and 1.3.3 Pro-active techniques to reduce the occurrence of arson. INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITIES OF KENT AND COVINGTON RELATING TO FIRE PREVENTION SERVICES - 1 2. Administration of Agreement. To carry out the purpose of this Agreement, a two-person board is hereby created to administer this Agreement ("Administrative Board"). The Administrative Board shall consist of the Fire Chief for the Kent Fire Department and the City Manager or Chief of Police for the City of Covington The Administrative Board shall meet no less than one time per year to discuss the performance of the obligations of Kent and Covington pursuant to this Agreement. The Administrative Board may, at its discretion and by mutual agreement, develop policies and procedures to aid in the implementation of this Agreement. 3. Fire Prevention Services 3.1 Fire Marshal Services. Unless otherwise provided for within this Agreement, all work performed by Kent will be conducted at its offices. 3.1.1 Fire Code Administration. Fire code administration services shall be performed under the authority granted by the International Fire Code as adopted and amended by the City of Covington. When possible, Covington's local code amendments will be adopted in consultation with Kent's Fire Marshal. If local code amendments are adopted without consulting Kent's Fire Marshal, Covington will promptly give Kent's Fire Marshal notice of such local code amendments in order for Kent to carry out the services provided for in this Agreement. Administrative rulings, interpretations, and policies shall be retained in accordance with the City of Covington record retention policies Covington shall make all changes to its record retention policy promptly available to Kent Whenever practical, it shall be the policy to streamline the differences between the Cities of Kent and Covington fire code rulings, interpretations, and policies. 3.1.2 Administration of Fire Prevention Programs. Administration of fire prevention programs shall be performed in the same manner in the City of Kent and Covington Administration shall include management of any existing interlocal agreement between Kent and Covington. 3.1.3 Point of Contact. The Kent Fire Marshal's point of contact shall be Covington's Community Development Director or his/her designee, or other individual as designated by Covington's City Manager 3.1.4 Information. The Kent Fire Marshal will make every attempt to keep Covington's point of contact informed and apprised of problems and/or circumstances arising from the administration of the fire code or prevention programs. In return, Covington's point of contact will make every attempt to keep the Kent Fire Marshal informed and apprised of circumstances and/or situations in Covington. INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITIES OF KENT AND COVINGTON RELATING TO FIRE PREVENTION SERVICES - 2 3.2 International Fire Code (IFC) Services. 3.2.1 Inspection Pursuant to the IFC. Kent shall perform fire inspections for Covington in accordance with Section 106 of the IFC, and for permits identified in Section 105 of the IFC. 3.2.1.1 Manner of Inspections. Unless otherwise specifically stated in this Agreement, inspections shall be performed for Covington in the same manner and under the same circumstances as such inspections would be performed for Kent, subject only to any difference provided for in Covington's local code amendments. 3.2.1.2 Freauencv of Inspections. Kent shall perform inspections of permits identified in Section 105 6 of the L IFC at least annually. 3.2.1.3 Code Enforcement. Although Kent shall provide inspection services, Covington shall be responsible for taking any action to enforce the provisions of the IFC. Covington shall be fully responsible for bringing any cause of action before any court, hearing examiner, board, committee, or other body empowered to determine responsibility for violations of the IFC and shall be responsible for pursuing and collecting any fines, penalties, compliance, and abatement. Kent staff who inspected the property and found it to be in violation shall appear before any court, hearing examiner, board, committee, or other body empowered to enforce the provisions of the IFC in order to assist Covington with enforcing the IFC. 3.2.2 Plan Review Pursuant to the IFC. Kent shall review plans for building construction, building alteration, and as required by the IFC and Covington's local code amendments. Covington shall deliver the plans to Kent for review. All plan review work will be conducted at Kent. 3.2.2.1 Time for Review. Upon its receipt of plans from Covington, Kent shall have two (2) weeks to conduct its initial plan review and to provide comments regarding those plans. If Kent finds that more time is required to complete its review, Kent will promptly notify Covington and provide an explanation of why additional time is required. If mutually agreed to by the administrators of this Agreement, this two (2) week review period may be increased or decreased Upon completion of such review, Kent will return the plans along with any comments to Covington 3.2.2.2 Kent to be Available to Discuss Plans. Kent shall be available to Covington and the party who submitted the plans to discuss any comments to the plans or i INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITIES OF KENT ' AND COVINGTON RELATING TO FIRE PREVENTION SERVICES - 3 the requirements of the IFC and Covington's local code amendments. 3.2.2.3 Issuance of Permits - Collection of Fees. Covington shall establish all fees and will remain responsible for issuing all building permits and collecting all permit fees. 3.2.2.4 Records. Except for working copies, all other records, documents, and drawings pertaining to fire prevention services provided for under this Agreement will be maintained at the City of Covington City Hall and be the sole property of the City of Covington. 3.2.2.5 Other Services Necessary. Kent will provide additional services necessary during the permit review process, including pre-application review, pre-construction conferences, meetings, phone calls, and other such activities deemed necessary to provide a high level of customer service and effectively implement the intent of this Agreement and of the IFC. 3.2.3 Inspections Associated with Business Licensing. Kent will provide initial and annual fire and life safety inspections associated with business licensing in Covington. 3.2.4 Approval of Placement of Hydrants. Kent will approve the placement of all hydrants within the City of Covington for the water purveyors. 3.3 Fire Investigative Services. 3.3.1 Origin and Cause Investigations. Origin and cause investigations shall be performed in accordance with the Kent Fire Investigation Unit Policies and Procedures. Furthermore, investigations shall follow the recommended procedures as outlined by the State of Washington Certified Fire Investigator program. , Origin and cause determinations shall fall into the following categories Accidental, Incendiary, Natural, and Undetermined The investigation of the origin and cause of a fire shall be conducted in a timely manner, and all reports and documentation that are produced as a result of the investigation shall be prepared in a timely manner. Reports and documentation produced during an investigation shall be maintained by Kent for a period of seven (7) years in accordance with Kent's record retention policy. As Kent's Fire Investigators are commissioned law enforcement personnel, any evidence gathered during a criminal investigation shall be maintained by the Kent Police Department in accordance with Kent policies and procedures relating to the retention of evidence of other crimes. 3.3.2 Criminal Investigations Limited to Arson and Other Related Crimes. In the event of an incendiary fire cause, the Kent Fire Investigation Unit shall conduct an appropriate criminal investigation INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITIES OF KENT AND COVINGTON RELATING TO FIRE PREVENTION SERVICES - 4 to include evidence collection, witness interviews, follow-up documentation, suspect interrogations, and suspect arrest when probable cause exists In the event that it is determined that the incident originated as a result of an explosive device, a King County Sheriff's Office Bomb Disposal Unit Detective will be called and a cooperative or parallel investigation will be conducted. Every effort shall be made to have a uniformed Covington Police Officer present when effecting arrests in the City of Covington. All proper documentation shall be completed for the filing of criminal charges as per the King County Prosecutor Filing Guidelines. 3.3.3 Proactive Technigues to Reduce the Occurrence of ' Arson. The Kent Fire Investigation Unit recognizes that by taking a proactive stance to combat arson, many smaller arson fires may be prevented before larger fires are caused. Therefore, the Fire Investigation unit shall employ proven techniques used to identify arson offenders These include, but are not limited to, conducting surveillance, pin mapping, and intelligence gathering when appropriate and in accordance with applicable laws. 3.3.4 Information. The Kent Fire Investigation Unit shall make every attempt to keep the Police Chief of Covington informed as to the status of all fires that occur in the City of Covington by providing a monthly report, in a form approved by Covington's Police Chief, by the 5th of the following month. The report shall include the following information: 3.3.4.1 Case Numbers; ' 3.3.4.2 Location, 3.3.4.3 Cause; 3.3.4.4 Brief Summary; 3.3 4 5 Disposition, 3.3.4.6 Involved individuals; and 3.3.4.7 Change in status of any existing case. ' Furthermore, an annual report shall be completed and submitted to Covington by February 15 of the following year which describes the Fire Investigations that have taken place the previous ' year. 4. Duration. This Agreement shall become effective on October 1, 2009. Should this Agreement be ratified by the legislative bodies of Covington and Kent ' after October 1, 2009, this Agreement shall be effective retroactively as of October 1, 2009 Unless terminated as provided for in Section 7, this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect through December 31, 2012. This Agreement may be extended by mutual written agreement of the parties subject to the ratification of such extension by the legislative body of each city, and the execution of an appropriate contract amendment. S. Payment to Kent. In consideration of this Agreement and the services provided, Covington will pay Kent an hourly rate as identified in subsection 5.1 for each hour of all work performed by Kent staff. Each hour shall be divided into fifteen (15) minute increments, or four (4) units. Covington shall pay for each INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITIES OF KENT AND COVINGTON RELATING TO FIRE PREVENTION SERVICES - 5 fifteen (15) minute increment, which shall be rounded to the nearest fifteen (15) ' minute increment. Covington shall be required to pay Kent regardless of whether Covington is paid or collects its fees from permit applicants or other responsible parties for the services rendered by Kent staff. At the end of each quarter, Kent will invoice Covington for the services provided during that immediately preceding quarter by the loth of the following month. For the purposes of this Agreement, quarters shall end on March 31, June 30, September 30, and December 31 of each year. Covington will remit payment to Kent within thirty (30) days from the date of Kent's invoice. 5.1 Hourly Rate. 5.1.1 Fire Marshal. Covington shall pay Kent an hourly rate of , $140.00 per hour for work performed by Kent's Fire Marshal. 5.1.2 Other Sworn Personnel. Covington shall pay Kent an hourly rate of $118.00 per hour for work performed by all other Kent staff, excluding Kent's Fire Marshal. 5.1.3 Annual Ad]ustment. Each year, the hourly rates charged ' under this Agreement will increase by the amount equal to the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for Seattle- Tacoma-Bremerton (All Urban Consumers) for the previous year from the period of June to June. 5.2 Billing Statement. Kent shall submit a quarterly billing ' statement to Covington that shall contain hourly billing information for services rendered in a form agreed upon by the Administrative Board. 5.3 Billing Statement Dispute. In the event that there is a dispute ' regarding the amount of money owed by Covington to Kent, the Administrative Board shall make every effort to resolve such dispute In the event that there is no resolution to the dispute, the disputed amount shall be placed into the registry of the King County Superior Court until the dispute is resolved by agreement of the parties or in a court with Jurisdiction over the subject matter of the dispute. , 5.4 Reconciliation of Amount Due After Termination or Expiration. Within thirty (30) days of the effective date of this Agreement's expiration or ' earlier termination, Kent shall submit to Covington a statement as described in subsection 5.2 of this Agreement for the past quarter or part thereof. Within thirty (30) days of submitting the statement, the parties shall reconcile the account and determine the amount Covington owes to Kent for unpaid ' services. Final payment and settlement of accounts shall occur within ninety (90) days of the effective date of termination of the Agreement. 6. Ownershin of Property. The parties to this Agreement do not ' contemplate the acquisition of any property to carry out the purposes of this Agreement. Any property owned by Kent shall remain the property of Kent and any property owned by Covington shall remain the property of Covington. INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITIES OF KENT AND COVINGTON RELATING TO FIRE PREVENTION SERVICES - 6 7. Termination. 7.1 Termination by Notice. This Agreement may be terminated by i either party upon it providing the other party with 180 days advance written notice of such termination. 7.2 Termination by Mutual Written Agreement. This Agreement ' may be terminated at any time by mutual written agreement of the parties. 7.3 Termination for Breach. Kent may terminate this Agreement with fourteen (14) days advance written notice upon the failure of Covington to make payments as required by this Agreement. Covington may terminate this Agreement upon fourteen (14) days advance written notice in the event Kent fails to provide services as required in this Agreement except disputes ' handled per Section 5.3. 8. Indemnification and Hold Harmless. Covington agrees to defend, ' indemnify, and hold harmless Kent and each of its employees, officials, agents, and volunteers from any and all losses, claims, liabilities, lawsuits, or legal judgments arising out of any negligent or tortious actions or inactions by Covington or any of its employees, officials, agents, or volunteers, while acting within the scope of the 1 duties required by this Agreement. All costs, including but not limited to attorneys fees, court fees, mediation fees, arbitration fees, settlements, awards of compensation, awards of damages of every kind, etc., shall be paid by Covington or ' its insurer. This provision shall survive the expiration of this Agreement. This provision shall also survive and remain in effect in the event that a court or other entity with jurisdiction determines that this Agreement is not enforceable. ' Kent agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless Covington and each of its employees, officials, agents, and volunteers from any and all losses, damages, claims, liabilities, lawsuits, or legal judgments arising out of any negligent or tortious actions or inactions by Kent or any of its employees, officials, agents, or volunteers, while acting within the scope of the duties required by this Agreement. All costs, including but not limited to attorneys fees, court fees, mediation fees, arbitration ' fees, settlements, awards of compensation, awards of damages of every kind, etc., shall be paid by Kent or its insurer. This provision shall survive the expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement. This provision shall also survive and remain in ' effect in the event that a court or other entity with jurisdiction determines that this interlocal Agreement is not enforceable. It is further specifically and expressly understood that the indemnification ' provided herein constitutes each party's waiver of immunity under industrial insurance, Title 51 RCW, solely to carry out the purposes of this indemnification clause. The parties further acknowledge that they have mutually negotiated this ' waiver 9. Insurance. Each city shall carry and maintain, for the duration of this ' Agreement, general liability, property damage, and errors and omissions insurance coverage with an admitted carrier for the state of Washington with the following minimums. INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITIES OF KENT ' AND COVINGTON RELATING TO FIRE PREVENTION SERVICES - 7 General Liability: $1 million per occurrence, and Property Damage: $1 million per occurrence; and Errors and Omissions: $1 million per occurrence. The insurance policies of each city shall name the other city and its officials, officers, employees, and volunteers, who are acting within the scope of this ' Agreement as additional named insureds for any and all actions taken by each city, its officials, officers, employees, and volunteers in the scope of their duties pursuant to this Agreement The insurance policy or policies shall have a thirty (30) days prior notice of cancellation clause to be given to the other city, in writing, in the event of ' termination or material modification of the insurance coverage. The insurance shall be "occurrence based" rather than "claims made " In the alternative, each city may satisfy the requirements of this section by becoming or remaining a participant in an ' authorized self insurance pool in the state of Washington with protection equal to or greater than that specified herein. 10. Miscellaneous. ' 10.1 Non-Waiver of Breach. The failure of either party to insist upon strict performance of any of the covenants and agreements contained in this ' Agreement, or to exercise any option conferred by this Agreement in one or more instances shall not be construed to be a waiver or relinquishment of those covenants, agreements or options, and the same shall be and remain in ' full force and effect. 10.2 Resolution of Disputes and Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. If the parties are unable to settle any dispute, difference or claim arising from the parties' performance of this Agreement, the exclusive means of resolving that dispute, difference, or claim, shall only be by filing ' suit exclusively under the venue, rules, and jurisdiction of the King County Superior Court, King County, Washington, unless the parties agree in writing to an alternative dispute resolution process. In any claim or lawsuit for , damages arising from the parties' performance of this Agreement, each party shall pay all its own legal costs and attorney's fees incurred in defending or bringing such claim or lawsuit, in addition to any other recovery or award ' provided by law, provided, however, nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to limit the parties' right to indemnification under this Agreement. 10.3 Assignment. Any assignment of this Agreement by either party ' without the prior written consent of the non-assigning party shall be void. If the non-assigning party gives its consent to any assignment, the terms of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect and no further assignment ' shall be made without additional written consent. The parties contemplate that a Regional Fire Authority may be created and may become effective on a date specified in a ballot measure. The parties agree that upon creation of ' such a Regional Fire Authority, this Agreement will be automatically assigned to the Regional Fire Authority and the parties to this Agreement shall be parties to the Regional Fire Authority and Covington and Kent shall no longer be a party to this Agreement. , INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITIES OF KENT AND COVINGTON RELATING TO FIRE PREVENTION SERVICES - 8 ' The parties recognize that Kent may enter additional interlocal ' agreements with other government agencies for the performance of the work called for in this Agreement The parties also recognize that Kent may become a party to an interlocal agency in conjunction with other south county ' municipalities for the purpose of performing the work called for in this Agreement. Covington agrees that by signing this Agreement, the performance of the work called for in this Agreement may be performed by an interlocal agency in which Kent is a party, and that investigators who are employed by jurisdictions other than Kent which are a party to that other interlocal agreement may perform the work called for in this Agreement; provided that all other terms of this Agreement shall apply to the performance of the work in Covington. 10.4 Modification. No waiver, alteration, or modification of any of ' the provisions of this Agreement shall be binding unless in writing and signed by a duly authorized representative of each party and subject to ratification by the legislative body of each City. ' 10.5 Compliance with Laws. Each party agrees to comply with all local, federal and state laws, rules, and regulations that are now effective or in the future become applicable to this Agreement. 10.6 Entire Agreement. The written terms and provisions of this Agreement, together with any exhibits attached hereto, shall supersede all ' prior communications, negotiations, representations or agreements, either verbal or written of any officer or other representative of each party, and such statements shall not be effective or be construed as entering into or forming a ' part of or altering in any manner this Agreement All of the exhibits are hereby made part of this Agreement Should any of the language of any exhibits to this Agreement conflict with any language contained in this Agreement, the language of this document shall prevail. 10.7 Severability. If any section of this Agreement is adjudicated to be invalid, such action shall not affect the validity of any section not so ' adjudicated. 10.8 Interpretation. The legal presumption that an ambiguous term ' of this Agreement should be interpreted against the party who prepared the Agreement shall not apply. INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITIES OF KENT ' AND COVINGTON RELATING TO FIRE PREVENTION SERVICES - 9 10.9 Notice. All communications regarding this Agreement shall be sent to the parties at the addresses listed on the signature page of the , Agreement, unless notified to the contrary Any written notice hereunder shall become effective upon personal service or three (3) business days after the date of mailing by registered or certified mail, and shall be deemed ' sufficiently given if sent to the addressee at the address stated in this Agreement or such other address as may be hereafter specified in writing. IN WITNESS, the parties below execute this Agreement, which shall become effective on the last date entered below. COVINGTON: KENT: ' CITY OF COVINGTON: CITY OF KENT: By, By: Print Name: Derek M Matheson Print Name: Suzette Cooke , Its City Manager Its Mayor DATE: DATE: ' NOTICES TO BE SENT TO: NOTICES TO BE SENT TO: Derek M. Matheson, City Manager Jim Schneider, Chief , City of Covington City of Kent Fire Department 16720 SE 2715t Street 220 Fourth Avenue South Covington, WA 98042 Kent, WA 98032 (253) 856-4300 (telephone) (253) 638-1110 (telephone) (253) 856-6300 (facsimile) (253) 638-1122 (facsimile) ' APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO FORM: ' Sara Springer, Arthur"Pat" Fitzpatrick, ' City Attorney Deputy City Attorney P\Civil\FIIW\OpmFile\0040-2009\Covingmnfacdb l-FUeSeMce doc I INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITIES OF KENT AND COVINGTON RELATING TO FIRE PREVENTION SERVICES - 10 ' Kent City Council Meeting Date November 17, 2009 Category Consent Calendar - 6E 1. SUBJECT: COUNCIL ABSENCE - APPROVE ' 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Approve an excused absence from tonight's meeting for Councilmember Ranniger, who is unable to attend. 3. EXHIBITS: Memorandum 4. RECOMMENDED BY: (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) ' 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? N/A Revenue? N/A ' Currently in the Budget? Yes _ No 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ' ACTION: ' City Council ' Debbie Raplee, Council President Phone 253-856-5712 Fax 253-856-6712 K E N T W A s"i N o r o N Address 220 Fourth Avenue S Kent, WA 98032-5895 MEMORANDUM TO: Suzette Cooke, Mayor City Councilmembers FROM: Debbie Ranniger, Councilmember DATE: November 6, 2009 SUBJECT: City Council Excused Absence I would like to request an excused absence from the November 17, 2009 ' City Council meeting. I will be unable to attend. Thank you for your consideration. Debbie Ranniger ' JP Kent City Council Meeting Date November 17, 2009 ' Category Other Business - 7A 1. SUBJECT: JOINT UNDERWRITING ASSOCIATION RESOLUTION 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Some public comments and media coverage regarding the flooding potential attributable to the condition of the Howard Hanson dam have led to the assumption that winter flooding is inevitable rather than a potential risk. As a result, the insurance market has been inundated with coverage requests, and the market has dried up. The scarcity of any supplemental insurance has hit Green River Valley businesses especially hard given national flood insurance limits of $500,000 for a building and $500,000 for its contents, which is grossly inadequate for commercial, distribution, and warehousing firms that depend on the operation of tens or hundreds of millions of dollars' worth of equipment. The Washington State Legislature has the ability to establish a "Joint Underwriting Association" that can assure the creation of a supplemental insurance market, and which has proven to work in other areas in prior years. City staff recommends council adopt a resolution urging the Washington State Legislature to take immediate action to establish a Joint Underwriting Association. 3. EXHIBITS: 11/3/2009, Memorandum from City Attorney to Operations Committee and Resolution 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Operations Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) ' 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? N/A Revenue? N/A Currently in the Budget? Yes No 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTIOppN: Councilmember lam( moves, Councilmember seconds to adopt Resolution No. ] I requesting the Legislature establish a Joint Underwriting Association to make supplemental flood insurance available to Green River Valley businesses. ' DISCUSSION: Y� ACTION: i J LAW DEPARTMENT Tom Brubaker, City Attorney ' Phone: 253-856-5770 a KEN T Fax: 253-856-6770 WA5HINGTON Address: 220 Fourth Avenue S. Kent, WA. 98032-5895 November 3, 2009 To: Operations Committee From: Tom Brubaker, City Attorney Regarding: Resolution Requesting State Action to Establish Joint Underwriting Association Regarding Business Flood Insurance MOTION: Move to recommend Council adopt the proposed resolution requesting the Legislature establish a Joint Underwriting Association to make supplemental flood insurance available to Green River Valley businesses. SUMMARY: Some public comments and media coverage regarding the flooding potential attributable to the condition of the Howard Hanson dam have led to the assumption that 1 winter flooding is inevitable rather than a potential risk. As a result, the insurance market has been inundated with coverage requests, and the market has dried up. The scarcity of any supplemental insurance is a particular hardship for hundreds if not thousands of Green River Valley businesses, given national flood insurance limits of $500,000 for a building and $500,000 for its contents, which is grossly inadequate for commercial, distribution, and warehousing firms that depend on the operation of tens or hundreds of millions of dollars' worth of equipment. This leaves many businesses either unable to insure their operations, sub]ect to dramatically increased costs, or both. Additionally, these insurance concerns have some businesses worried about staying in the Green River Valley, or electing not to locate their operations in what has traditionally been a very business-conducive, business-friendly place to operate. The Washington State Legislature has the ability to establish a "Joint Underwriting Association" that can assure the creation of a supplemental insurance market, and which has proven to work in other areas in prior years. The lead time it takes to establish a Joint Underwriting Association, to take administrative steps to form it, and to have insurance ' available to Green River Valley area businesses can be extensive. Therefore, City staff recommends council adopt a resolution urging the Washington State Legislature to take immediate action to establish a Joint Underwriting Association. This resolution was brought as an informational item to the Operations Committee at its November 3, 2009, meeting. This resolution will be presented to the Operations Committee ' and the full City Council for action on November 17, 2009. BUDGET IMPACT: None. ■ 1 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, urging the Washington State Legislature to quickly enact legislation establishing a "Joint Underwriting Association," to make supplemental flood insurance available to Green River Valley Businesses. RECITALS A. The United States Army Corps of Engineers ("Corps") has declared that the reservoir capacity and the associated flood control capabilities of the Howard Hanson Dam have been diminished. As a result, local communities downstream should plan for the increased risk for flooding in the Green River Valley during 2009 and subsequent flood 1 seasons, until the Corps has completed repairs to the dam. B. Although the floor of the Green River Valley could experience flooding, some public comments and media coverage have led some residents and businesses to assume that winter flooding is inevitable rather ' a potential risk. Additionally, federal, state, and local elected officials have urged citizens and business owners to take precautionary steps and to obtain national flood insurance and supplemental insurance, if necessary. However, the insurance market has been inundated with coverage 1 Resolution of Support for State ' It Underwriting Assoc. Regarding Business Flood Insurance Availability requests, but the threat of flooding has caused the market to dry up or even wipe out the availability of insurance for those who do in fact need it. C. The scarcity of any supplemental insurance is a particular hardship for hundreds if not thousands of Green River Valley businesses. National flood insurance limits of $500,000 for a building and $500,000 for its contents are grossly inadequate for many commercial, distribution, and warehousing firms that depend on the operation of tens or hundreds of millions of dollars' worth of equipment. This leaves many businesses either unable to insure their operations, subject to dramatically increased costs, or both. D. For all these reasons, anxiety-ridden businesses are considering whether to stay in the Green River Valley or even to relocate their operations outside the Valley, which traditionally has been a very business-conducive, business-friendly place to operate. This growing insurance crisis is beginning to threaten the economic underpinnings of the Green River Valley, which hosts the West Coast's second-largest warehouse distribution center. It is a distribution lifeline for railroads and the Ports of Seattle and Tacoma. Its estimated payroll exceeds $8 billion, and it is a critical employment hub for the Central Puget Sound and the State of Washington. For these reasons, it is imperative to establish a market, as soon as possible, where businesses can get supplemental insurance, so that fears and anxieties regarding the flood insurance market ' can be quelled. E. The Washington State Legislature has the ability to establish a "Joint Underwriting Association" that can assure the creation of a supplemental insurance market. This approach has proven to work I elsewhere in prior years when insurance availability crises occurred. Given 2 Resolution of Support for State Jt Underwriting Assoc. Regarding Business Flood Insurance Availability ' the lead time it takes to establish a Joint Underwriting Association in order to make insurance available to Green River Valley area businesses, the time for action is now. Therefore, the Kent City Council desires to adopt ' this resolution urging the Washington State Legislature to take immediate action to establish a Joint Underwriting Association. i NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: RESOLUTION SECTION 1. - Support Establishment of Joint Underwnting Association. The Kent City Council strongly supports the legislative enactment of a "Joint Underwriting Association" formed to provide supplemental flood insurance for Green River Valley businesses. 1 SECTION 2. - Urge State Legislative Action. The Kent City Council urges the Governor of the State of Washington and the Washington State Legislature to act in the most expeditious manner possible, in Special Session if that can be achieved, to enact Joint Underwriting Association legislation that provides insurance relief for Valley businesses. SECTION 3. - Severability. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this resolution is declared unconstitutional or invalid for any reason, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this resolution. 1 SECTION 4. - Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date of this resolution is hereby ratified and affirmed. 3 Resolution of Support for State Jt Underwriting Assoc. Regarding Business Flood Insurance Availability I SECTION 5. - Effective Date. This resolution shall take effect and be in force immediately upon its passage. PASSED at a regular open public meeting by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, this day of November, 2009. CONCURRED in by the Mayor of the City of Kent this day of November, 2009. , SUZETTE COOKE, MAYOR ATTEST: BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: TOM BRUBAKER, CITY ATTORNEY I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of Resolution No. passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, the ' day of November, 2009. BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK P\6vil\Resolution\Flood-)tUndemritingAssocReBnessF]oodtnsumnce doc 4 Resolution of Support for State I Jt Underwriting Assoc. Regarding Business Flood Insurance Availability Kent City Council Meeting Date November 17, 2009 Category Other Business - 7B 1. SUBJECT: LOCAL BUSINESS PREFERENCE ORDINANCE 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: The proposed ordinance encourages a "best efforts" approach to purchase from or contract with local Kent businesses. This local business preference, however, will not prohibit City staff from comparing the 1 quality or fitness for use of supplies, materials, equipment, or services when selecting the best vendor, whether within or outside of Kent. 1 Exempt from the provisions of this ordinance are goods or services procured under a cooperative purchase agreement or an interlocal agreement, contracts for professional or technical service consultants as referenced under KCC 3.70.060, contracts entered into under emergency situations, and contracts funded by a separate governmental entity whose laws, regulations, or policies prohibit application of this local business preference. 3. EXHIBITS: 11/3/2009, Memorandum from City Attorney to Operations Committee and Ordinance 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Operations Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? N/A Revenue? N/A Currently in the Budget? Yes No 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember U k4t, moves, Councilmember seconds I to adopt Ordinance No. 3C135, which amends chapter 3.70 of the Kent City Code to add a new section 3.70.045 establishing a procurement preference for purchasing from or contracting with local Kent businesses. a4 DISCUSSION: ci�'Vyv-q1" ACTION: D LAW DEPARTMENT Tom Brubaker, City Attorney LPhone: 253-856-5770 KEN T Fax: 253-856-6770 W A S H I N G T G N Address: 220 Fourth Avenue S. Kent, WA. 98032-5895 November 3, 2009 To: Operations Committee 1 From: Tom Brubaker, City Attorney Regarding: Local Business Preference Ordinance - Amend KCC 3.70.045 MOTION: Recommend Council adopt the proposed ordinance which amends chapter 3.70 of the Kent City Code to add a new section 3.70.045 establishing a procurement preference for purchasing from or contracting with local Kent businesses. SUMMARY: Council Members Ron Harmon and Jamie Danielson requested the Law ' Department prepare a draft ordinance that encourages a "best efforts" approach to purchase from or contract with local Kent businesses. This local business preference, however, will not prohibit City staff from comparing the quality or ' fitness for use of supplies, materials, equipment, or services when selecting the best vendor, whether within or outside of Kent. Whenever any City staff member decides to procure goods or services from a business outside of Kent, if a local business is also under consideration, the manager in charge of making that procurement shall provide an explanation in a suitable format, electronic or otherwise, that will be retained in a central repository in the City. ' Exempt from the provisions of this ordinance are goods or services procured under a cooperative purchase agreement or an interlocal agreement, contracts for professional or technical service consultants as referenced under KCC 3.70.060, 1 contracts entered into under emergency situations, and contracts funded by a separate governmental entity whose laws, regulations, or policies prohibit application of this local business preference. BUDGET IMPACT: None. l i i S ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, adding a new section 3.70.045 to Chapter 3.70 of the Kent City Code establishing a procurement preference for purchasing from or contracting with local businesses. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: ORDINANCE SECTION 1. - Amend Ch. 3.70 KCC - Local Business Preference. The following new section 3.70.045, entitled "Local Business Preference," shall be added to Chapter 3.70 of the Kent City Code relating to procurement contracts as follows: Sec. 3.70.045. Local Business Preference. A. F1ndlncis and Intent. The City of Kent annually spends significant amounts on purchasing personal property, materials, and contractual services as part of its ongoing operation and management of the City and its infrastructure. The money used in making these purchases of goods and services is derived, in large part, from taxes, fees, and utility revenues derived from local businesses and local residents, many of whom work for 1 Local Business Preference - KCC 3.70.045 these local businesses. The City Council finds that funds expended by our City should, to the extent possible and as allowed by law, be placed back in the City to support our local economy. B. Local Business Defined. The term, "local business," means any corporation, partnership, sole proprietor, limited liability company, or other business entity that has a Kent business license, maintains a physical business address within the City's corporate limits (as may be amended in the future) in an area zoned or otherwise approved under the Kent City Code for the operation of that business, and has at least one (1) employee who reports to work at that address on a daily basis to operate or perform that business. Post office boxes shall not be used for the purpose of establishing physical address of a local business. C. Local Preference in Purchasing and Contracting. When procuring contracts as provided for in this chapter, the City shall make every effort to purchase from or contract with local businesses. When other product models that meet the same specifications are locally available (i.e., GE 100-watt light bulb vs. Sylvania 100-watt light bulb), thoughtful , consideration should be given to purchasing the model that is offered by a local business. When a local business offers functionally equivalent products for the goods or services sought by the City (i.e., 100-watt incandescent light bulb vs. a functionally equivalent fluorescent or LED bulb), thoughtful consideration should be given to purchasing the product that is offered by a local business. When selecting a business in response to a request for proposal, or when selecting a business that provides consulting services or other services that provide unique expertise, thoughtful consideration should be given to select a local business that can provide those products or services. However, the preference established in this section shall not prohibit the ability to compare quality or fitness for use of supplies, materials, equipment, or services proposed for 2 Local Business Preference - KCC 3.70.045 procurement and shall not prohibit the ability to select the best business I when comparing the qualifications, character, responsibility, or fitness of the businesses under consideration. D. Written Record Required When Non-Local Business Selected. Whenever any City staff member decides to procure goods or services from a non-local business when a local business was also under consideration for that procurement, the manager in charge of making that procurement shall provide an explanation in a suitable format, electronic or otherwise, which will be retained in a central repository in the City. E. Exceptions to Local Business Preference. The procurement preference set forth in this ordinance shall not apply to any of the following: 1. Goods or services provided under a cooperative purchasing agreement or interlocal agreement. 1 2. Purchases or contracts that are funded, in whole or in part, by a separate governmental entity and the laws, regulations, or policies of that separate governmental entity prohibit application of this local business preference. 3. Professional or technical service consultant contracts as referenced under KCC 3.70.060 1 4. Purchases or contracts made under emergency situations. 1 SECTION 2. — Severability. If any one or more section, subsections, or sentences of this ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect. ' 3 Local Business Preference - KCC 3.70.045 i SECTION 3. - Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days from and after its passage as provided by law. SUZETTE COOKE, MAYOR ATTEST: BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK j APPROVED AS TO FORM: TOM BRUBAKER, CITY ATTORNEY PASSED: day of November, 2009. i APPROVED: day of November, 2009. PUBLISHED: day of November, 2009. I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No. passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the City of Kent as hereon indicated. (SEAL) BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK P\Cwd\Ordinance\LocalPurchasingPreference docx 4 Local Business Preference - ' KCC 3.70.045 REPORTS FROM STANDING COMMITTEES AND STAFF A. COUNCIL PRESIDENT' �QQ I � J ` B. MAYOR T t u�A ti 7r t a 54 A �� boo Cr - c< me J �c c a G�e;a p�, �v C. OPERATIONS COMMI�EE D. PARKS AND HUMAN SERVICES COMMITTEE E. PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE i F. PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE G. PUBLIC WORKS H. ADMINISTRATIONOY) 16 120( YYw (A-c;h� - -16 ` REPORTS FROM SPECIAL COMMITTEES 1 KENT W A!J NIN OTO M OPERATIONS COMMITTEE MINUTES OCTOBER 20, 2009 Committee Members Present. Debbie Raplee, Tim Clark, and Les Thomas The meeting was called to order by Tim Clark at 4:08 p.m. 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES DATED OCTOBER 6, 2009 Thomas moved to approve the minutes of the October 6, 2009 Operations Committee meeting. Raplee seconded the motion, which passed 3-0. 2. APPROVAL OF VOUCHERS DATED OCTOBER 15, 2009 Finance Director Bob Nachlinger presented the vouchers for October 15, 2009. Raplee moved to approve the vouchers dated October 15, 2009. Thomas seconded the motion, which passed 3-0. 3. MOVE TO RECOMMEND COUNCIL AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO SIGN A CONTRACT WITH WEBSOLUTIONS TECHNOLOGY, INC., IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $59,700 FOR WEB REDESIGN, USER EXPERIENCE, SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT, AND OTHER SERVICES AS MAY BE ELECTED BY THE CITY. IT Manager Curt Ryser advised that the City is looking to Websolutions Technology, Inc. to provide web design and development services assisting staff in implementing a new Web site design for the City. BUDGET IMPACT: In response to the City's Request for Proposal, Websolutions submitted a proposal to redesign the City's website for $29,625. In addition, the City is requesting council authorize an additional $30,075 to be available, at the City's election, for additional software components, software services, or design services. In no event will the total services provided by Websolutions exceed $59,700. These funds are budgeted in the Information Technology Plan as adopted. BACKGROUND: A total of thirteen (13) consulting firm responses were received to assist the city in redesigning the Web site. Of the thirteen (13) responses, six (6) were selected as finalists and interviewed by a sub-committee of the City's Communication Team. Websolutions Technology, Inc. was the preferred vendor based on its proposal, its interview, and its proposal costs. Council member Raplee voiced concerns about going through with this agreement at this time rather than waiting 6 months or so due to the due to the current budget challenges. Clark pointed out that it is already in the approved tech plan form last year and bonds have already been issued. Thomas indicated he would vote for it, but in light of budget concerns expressed by Raplee, he would like it passed along to full Council. ATTACHMENTS: Consultant Services Agreement with Websolutions Technology, Inc. Operations Committee Minutes October 20, 2009 Page: 2 Thomas moved to recommend Council authorize the Mayor to sign a contract with Websolutions Technology, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $59,700 for web redesign, user experience, software development, and , other services as may be elected by the City. Clark seconded the motion, which passed 2-1. Raplee opposed the motion. The motion passes 2-1 and goes under other business. Council member Clark gave notice to IT that because the motion is not passing out with full approval that puts it under other business and it will require further explanation because the money sourcing is an issue. 4. MOVE TO RECOMMEND THE OPERATIONS COMMITTEE MAKE A POLICY DECISION AND ADVISORY VOTE ON RECOMMENDED ASSET TRANSFERS AND RECOMMENDATION FOR THE CITY TO CONTRACT WITH THE REGIONAL FIRE AUTHORITY FOR FIRE PREVENTION, FIRE INVESTIGATION, AND EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SERVICES, WITH THESE ITEMS TO BE INCLUDED IN THE FINAL REGIONAL FIRE AUTHORITY PLAN. Fire Chief Jim Schneider presented a PowerPoint presentation on the Review of Future Regional Fire Authority Decisions. Agenda Items Included: Recommend Asset Transfers, Recommendation to Contract with the FRA for Services, Timeline for Future RFA Considerations, Policy Decision that will Become Part of the RFA Plan. The Committee raised questions Chief Schneider and Chief Administrative Officer John Hodgson responded to. Raplee moved to recommend the Operations Committee make a policy decision and advisory vote on recommended asset transfers and recommendation for the City to contract with the Regional Fire Authority for fire prevention, fire investigation, and emergency management services, with these items to be included in the final Regional Fire Authority Plan. Thomas seconded the motion which passed 3-0. 5. MOVE TO FORWARD TO COUNCIL WITHOUT RECOMMENDATION TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AT ITS MEETING ON OCTOBER 20, 2009, TO DETERMINE WHETHER THE COUNCIL SHOULD ADOPT A RESOLUTION OPPOSING INITIATIVE NO. 1033 CONCERNING STATE, COUNTY, AND CITY REVENUE. City Attorney Tom Brubaker advised that this item was put on the agenda as an informational item only. It brings the item before the Council as scheduled for tonight's Council meeting. Brubaker also noted that two speakers have been invited to speak at the Council meeting, Pro and Con - to give equal time to both campaigns. Initiative Measure No. 1033 will be placed before voters at the November 3, 2009, general election. If adopted, I-1033 would place an inflationary and population based growth limit on state, county, and city general fund revenues 3 Operations Committee Minutes October 20, 2009 Page: 3 received from taxes, fees, and other charges not expressly approved by voters. Revenues exceeding the limit must be placed in Lower Property Taxes Accounts and be used to reduce the following year's state, city, or county general fund property tax levies. Given the impact I-1033 would have on the City's budget, the Council has expressed a desire to consider public comment on the initiative and whether the City Council should adopt a resolution formally opposing the initiative. A public hearing regarding I-1033 and the adoption of a resolution opposing the initiative is scheduled before council the same night that it is presented to the Operations Committee. State law prohibits the use of public facilities for all campaign purposes. However, public facilities may be used if the City Council desires to take a formal and collective position. State law provides public facilities may be used provided: (1) the notice of the meeting includes the title and number of the ballot proposition; and (2) all are provided an approximately equal opportunity to express individual opinions (pro and con). Budget Impact: None The Committee raised questions which Brubaker responded to. Raplee moved to forward for Council, without recommendation, to conduct a public hearing at its Meeting on October 20, 2009, to determine whether the Council should adopt a resolution opposing Initiative Measure No. 1033 concerning state, state, county, and city revenue. The motion passed 2-1. Thomas opposed. T Pieeting adj?,urned at 4:35 p.m. 1 ancy Clar P Operation! Committee S cretary 1 �••/ KENT WnS HIN GT ON PLANNING & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MINUTES October 12, 2009 Committee Members Chair Jamie Danielson, Les Thomas, Deborah Ranniger 1 Danielson called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Thomas MOVED and Ranniger SECONDED to approve the Minutes of September 14, 2009. Motion CARRIED 3-0. 2. ELECTRIC VEHICLE (EV) INFRASTRUCTURE Planner Erin George reported on State Legislation's House Bill 1481, signed into law on May 12, 2009 mandating that local governments make provisions for EV infrastructure. She stated that by June 1, 2010 Kent's development regulations must allow EV infrastructure as a use in all areas not zoned for residential, resource use or critical areas. George stated that if Federal funding is not provided by February 1, 2010, the deadline defaults to July 1, 2011. George stated that Kent's Zoning Code allows utility facilities; and would accommodate the type of charger needed in residential houses. She stated that a minor code amendment would be required to address commercial or public facilities. Kent allows gas stations as a special use or conditional use in commercial zones outside of the downtown area and two of Kent's industrial zones. George stated that the City of Kent may wish to consider an amendment to the Building Code that would require that a specific percentage of parking stalls be equipped with the capacity and/or conduit for electric vehicle chargers within new multifamily developments. George stated that Kent City Code Chapter 14.01 provides an option for amending the Building Code. tGeorge stated that Nissan and Chevy will have mainstream highway capable electric vehicles available by the end of 2010. She described battery charging stations and spoke about the options for the location of those stations. George stated that the State is requiring 100% of city and state fleet vehicles be fueled by either electricity or bio-fuel by 2015, with the caveat "to extent determined practicable by the Dept of Commerce." George stated that Nissan and the Department of Energy, through a grant, are offering a test program of Nissan's new LEAF electric vehicles in October 2010. This program will be offered in five states including Washington. George stated that if the test area includes Kent, the City could apply, then purchase or lease a specific number of Nissan LEAFS, and in exchange chargers would be installed for free. This report was for informational purposes only. 2 3. 2009 ANNUAL DOCKET REPORT Planner William Osborne stated that the City received one docket item (Dkt-2009-1) this year. He stated that a private citizen has proposed an amendment to Kent's Development Regulations to establish definitive height limits for the Downtown Commercial Enterprise (DCE) zone within 300 feet of residential districts. The application indicated a preference for height limits similar to those in single family zones adjacent to the DCE zone, approximately 35 feet. Osborne stated that staff will bring this back to Committee in November with a recommendation, as to whether to move this item forward as part of the work program. This report was for informational purposes only. 4. 2008 ANNUAL DOCKET REPORT UPDATE Planner William Osborne reported on the status of the six (6) 2008 docket items. Osborne stated that 5 of the 6 proposed docket applications were incorporated into the work program for last year. Osborne stated that the following proposed amendments are anticipated for completion by spring 2010: 1) Amend the Capital Facilities Element incorporating the Transportation Master Plan's Inventory of Streets; 2) Amend the Comprehensive Plan's Parks and Open Space Element as part of the process for the Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Master Plan update; 3) Amend the Water System Plan to include the finalized Executive Summary and signature page. Osborne stated that the following two proposed amendments are recommended for inclusion in the 2011 work program, as part of the GMA-mandated 2011 Comprehensive Plan Update: 1) Kent Fire Department District 37's proposal to add a new Fire Protection Element to Kent's Comprehensive Plan that would include their Concurrency Management Plan and Land Capacity Analysis. 2) Planning's proposal to amend the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and Zoning District Map to reconcile split-designations on parcels throughout the City. This report was for informational purposes only. Adjournment Chair Danielson adjourned the meeting at 5:15 p.m. Pamela Mottram Planning & Economic Development Committee Secretary P\Planning\PEDC\2909\Minutes\Oct-12-09_PEDC-Min&C PEDC Minutes October 12, 2009 Page 2of2 �� KENT CITY OF KENT PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES October 13, 2009 COMMITTEE MEMBERS: Les Thomas, Jamie Danielson, and Ron Harmon, Chair The meeting was called to order by Chair Harmon at 5:03 PM. Harmon called for additions or deletions to the agenda, there were none. 1. Approval of Minutes J. Danielson moved to approve the minutes of the September 8, 2009 meeting. The motion was seconded by L. Thomas and passed 3-0. 2. Fire Department Asset Transfers and Contract for Services with the Regional Fire Authority - Advisory Vote Fire Chief Jim Schneider advised that there would not be an advisory vote on this issue at this meeting. He gave a PowerPoint presentation which reviewed the changes that would occur if the Kent City Council approves the plan at their December 2009 meeting. If approved by the Council, the plan would then go before voters on April 27, 2010, for the creation of the Regional Fire Authority. The Committee members agreed that the plan should be presented to the Operations Committee. 3. Cost Reimbursement Agreement Between King County Sheriff's Office and Kent Police Department - ACCEPT, AUTHORIZE and Establish Budget Chief of Police Steve Strachan explained the agreement provides reimbursement of officer overtime costs for the verification of addresses and residency of registered sex and kidnapping offenders. L. Thomas moved to recommend that Council authorize the Kent Police 1 Department to accept the Offender Verification grant in an amount not to exceed $51,200.65, authorize the Mayor to sign the Agreement and establish the budget. The motion was seconded by J. Danielson and passed 3-0. 4. Bulletproof Vest FY 2009 grant award - AUTHORIZE and ACCEPT Chief Strachan explained the federal program will fund fifty percent of new and replacement bulletproof vest costs for police officers. J. Danielson moved to recommend that Council authorize the Kent Police Department to accept the FY 2009 Bureau of Justice Assistance Bulletproof Vest (BVP) grant in an amount not to exceed $29,928. The motion was seconded by L. Thomas and passed 3-0. S. Cultural Competency Training - Kent Police Department - INFO ONLY Chief Strachan and Deputy Chief Mike Painter explained the purpose of the training which will be provided to all police department members by Executive Diversity Services, Inc. L. Thomas asked Chief Strachan and Chief Schneider how many minority employees are in each department. Both chiefs did not have the numbers with them but will report back to the Committee at a later meeting. 6. Police Flood Planning Update - INFO ONLY Chief Strachan explained the police department's role in the event of an evacuation order due to flooding of the Green River. He stated there is potential for flooding due to an increased risk of failure of the Howard Hanson Dam, but that a flood situation is not inevitable. Police will help Fire and other city staff deliver the evacuation order to residents, provide increased security in the flood zone and continue to provide police service to parts of the city outside of the flood zone. In the event of an evacuation order, the city Jail will be evacuated and the most serious offenders will be transferred to the King County Jail in Seattle. Less serious offenders will either be released and asked to report back to the Municipal Court when the flood event is over, or they will be offered work credit in exchange for helping with sand bagging or assisting with some other type of work. Chief mentioned that twenty inmates were working to fill sandbags today at the Jail's Annex. The meeting adjourned at 5:59 PM. Jo Thompson, Public Safety Committee Secretary Public Safety Committee Minutes 2 November 10, 2009 1 PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE MINUTES Monday, October 19, 2009 COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT, Committee Chair Debbie Raplee and Committee Members Ron Harmon and Les Thomas were present. The meeting was called to order at 4:02 p.m ITEM 1 — Approval of Minutes Dated October 05, 2009: Committee Member Thomas moved to approve the minutes of October 5, 2009. The 1 motion was seconded by Harmon and passed 3-0. ITEM 2 — Revision to the Parkins Code: Steve Mullen, Transportation Manager explained that the Chestnut Ridge Homeowners Association Board wrote a letter requesting that parking be prohibited between 10:00 p.m. to 6:00 a m due to an increasing number of concerns raised by residents regarding disturbances from young adults congregating in the Chestnut Ridge Park after the park has closed. The amendment to the ordinance will help to reduce disruptive outdoor late night activities at Chestnut Ridge Park and across the street from the park Harmon moved to recommend the Council adopt an ordinance to amend the Parking code 9.38.045, Parking Prohibited from 10:00 p.m. to 6.00 a.m., to include both sides of S. 203rd Street, from 100`h Avenue SE, westerly approximately 600 feet to the westerly boundary of Chestnut Ridge Park. The motion was seconded by Thomas and passed 3-0. ITEM 3 2"d Avenue Pedestrian Improvements/Consultant Contract with HWA Geo Sciences: Interim Public Works Director, Tim LaPorte stated that Public Works designed a pedestrian improvement project to replace some deteriorated and tree-damaged sidewalks in the Central Business District of the City. Routine inspection and construction management, including project documentation and pay estimate management will be done by City staff; however, the construction of this project will also involve materials testing and soils engineer/inspection that is beyond the expertise of City staff. HWA Geo Sciences possesses this expertise and was selected through a competitive process based. This project is the result of a federal grant; the city earmarked the matching funds some time ago. Thomas moved to authorize the Mayor sign a consultant contract between the City and HWA Geo Sciences, in the amount of $38,149, for the purpose of providing materials testing and inspection services related to 2nd Avenue Pedestrian Improvements Project upon concurrence of the language therein by the City Attorney and Interim Public Works Direction. The motion was seconded by Harmon and passed 3-0. ITEM 4 — Transit Update/Information Only: Monica Whitman, Commute Trip Reduction Coordinator, presented three transit updates; budget shortfall, Green River flood planning and the new route 513 King County is still looking at cuts across the board Monica will be attending the Regional Transit presentation on Wednesday, October 21, regarding the Green River flooding plan, and will return to the committee at a later date with results. Whitman was pleased to announce that the new partnership route from the Lakes and Riverview communities; that connects them to the Sounder transit center and the buses, has been well received. She has heard from several businesses in the area that have voiced their satisfaction with the new service. Information Only/No Motion Required i z PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE MINUTES Monday, October 19, 2009 ITEM 5 - Flood Fight/Information Only Tim LaPorte, Interim Public Works Director, gave a brief update on the flood Flight. He explained that there has been an unbelievable large amount of information that has been disseminated to citizens and businesses in the past few weeks. Staff has had to re-priontize their workloads in order to keep up with the requests Roughly one half of the giant sandbags have been placed on the east side of the river. Staff is looking at a couple of areas on the west side of the river as well. The bags will be placed by the November 1" deadline King County has signed an agreement to reimburse the City for just over $2 million for the flood fight. Staff will continue to update Council on this issue. Raplee suggested that a Questions and Answers page should be printed in the paper to help assist customers and businesses as well as staff. Information Only/No Motion Required ADDED ITEM: Harmon - Water and Drainage Rate increase. Harmon mentioned that he would like staff to be better educated in order to better answer questions from citizens and businesses instead of saying simply "Council raised the rates you will have to speak to them." LaPorte, said that staff is working on re-packaging information explaining the rate increases. Information Only/No Motion Required Adiourned: The meeting was adjourned at 4.52 p.m. Next Scheduled Meeting: Monday, November 2, 2009 at 4:00 p.m. Cheryl Viseth Public Works Committee Secretary 1 CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS 1 A. l 1 E i EXECUTIVE SESSION ACTION AFTER EXECUTIVE SESSION 1