Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
City Council Meeting - Council - Agenda - 02/17/2009
AG EN DIA I1RWIN$" E�j WI, ity of Kent U, -ty I. , n i „i { z 1, 1 110 �, d1g� , 1 February 17, 2009 „ k 4 Jill-, Mayor Suzette Cooke Debbie Raplee, Council Presi e ,t Councilrmembers Elizabeth Albertson Ron Hannon Tim Clark Deborah Rnniger Jamie Danielson Les Thoma's KENT WASHI NGTON City Clerk's office i 40 '00MI44's KENT CITY COUNCIL AGENDAS KENT February 17, 2009 WASHINGTON Council Chambers MAYOR: Suzette Cooke COUNCILMEMBERS: Debbie Ra lee, President Rap lee, Elizabeth Albertson Tim Clark Jamie Danielson Ron Harmon Deborah Ranniger Les Thomas ********************************************************************** COUNCIL WORKSHOP AGENDA 5:30 p.m. Item Description Speaker Time 1. Envision Midway Gloria Gould-Wessen 30 minutes 2. Council Retreat Briefing Council President Raplee 10 minutes ********************************************************************** COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA 7:00 p.m. 1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE 2. ROLL CALL 3. CHANGES TO AGENDA A. FROM COUNCIL, ADMINISTRATION, OR STAFF B. FROM THE PUBLIC - Citizens may request that an item be added to the agenda at this time. Please stand or raise your hand to be recognized by the Mayor. 4. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS A. Public Recognition B. Community Events C. Julia Patterson 2008 Recap D. Introduction of Appointees E. Public Safety Report 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Surplus Utility Property on Frager Road, Resolution 6. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Minutes of Previous Meeting - Approve B. Payment of Bills - None C. Human Services Commission Appointments - Confirm D. Countywide Planning Policies Amendment Resolution - Adopt E. Olympic Environmental Resources Consultant Contract - Authorize F. ShoWare Center - Add to Public Facility Ordinance - Adopt (Continued) COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA CONTINUED G. Prohibition of Retail Sale of Novelty Lighters hters Ordinance - Adopt P H. Bulletproof Vest Program Award - Accept I. Hazardous Materials Response Plan - Authorize -J iL 7. OTHER BUSINESS A. Federal Way School District Partnership 8. BIDS None 9. REPORTS FROM STANDING COMMITTEES, STAFF AND SPECIAL COMMITTEES 10. CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS -( R - I N�f S e c+� &-M "r ( .e 11. EXECUTIVE SESSION AND AFTER EXECUTIVE SESSION A. re%d&g itn e -s0 12. ADJOURN ENT NOTE: A copy of the full agenda packet is available for perusal in the City Clerk's Office and the Kent Library. The Agenda Summary page and complete packet are on the City of Kent web site at www.ci.kent.wa.us. An explanation of the agenda format is given on the back of this page. Any person requiring a disability accommodation should contact the City Clerk's Office in advance at (253) 856-5725. For TDD relay service call the Washington Telecommunications Relay Service at 1-800-833-6388. U UA O rb T O F- Q p C ELL o v O a vi C r0 >� ° c c>n� Qv ° o c ° o v O 7 O L v b0 6 OU v bq N 6C1 C ro>- b00 v ro v U C: 7 C E C r�C N 00 '^ ro aJ Q) N C` L tC L-y@ M O N ro v E �U.0 Q u v E E Y v vt-° o ac, �Qv 7-o E V` O c V m 3 v •� -6 L C 4; C C-d ''n C U O`v o o `. cones ro co ^ cva S �� vosro ` m - co �� o � EErocv uL c � a") 0" a' .. m7 moo• ro a v v� i v v EEL o o Cc: oL °J U u • _ c c ro �L o4; c v u O ° `o 0 o O 7m . o ro v C O (0 C E C ro T O O ro N Q ° > C L < E_6 N N_ y 7 L a/ v U O T aJ L v Vow= y Us2caugma3 _ a° � a � N� vE _ � ��w� w C: a O T y ro E L <v ro 7 = ro E ro C aJ v 7 �; C O _C M • vU c o o nr E c 5 u ao o �� L E cY 3 c E x x OOU ro O O L a; `^ v ° C Q a TQ m �S a Q TV v d o v c v c T E u u — o _^ 7 2 S V E h vE v_ i � li] Lo o > ro� C: E e s E �� V ° E v � �'' oT � � v � z, C o V n. 7 E v,— 'J'' ro= N T 1="' N c c ° Y o c ° p, fa Ql o °—IN ^ E 7 v > v roU o 4 o L on c � �> _ ` o�-0E ? ooAu vL Eauay L ccEd Ev c ~ � v > � LE EEoy�Qa�vi ` c� y ° vroy DCa a O V C O ` O v U v v� N O o 7 L L ry v, y a�O O O E O ce Q in C �^ a! V T U O >' ro THY V � N TU o o O 1)E ° N E E vU � � Y p� '� ° E z fro ro�� EU ON W vL �sU V N°L a a E o p v o e ca !!y _roFL- a NU m pU O.. C S' �n O vi aJ = L C E U ... 7 6! C G V 4J H C - C T C C ro T c J LIJU C v v L 7 0 T L ro b.0 v p a C `O— 7 a O ro p Cc) ro p v L 3Y > o F. _Yvvc=_Lc " moo oL °��SJro c FE- aM � °-c°i °w "c� � o ° ��r v ro p L C O L E L b0 ro 7 v R v c v 7 a p 0 a N n O C— -O V L v C-O C 3 v, L L 7 i C • Q u .~� c v~ o v z E E by v� E y v y y a� S ro—� c—�� y v� 0 c u m E C O E N O > U vt EL ° v N ro 0 C � C W v '=L7 w7s-< of -02,mL) O N� roron_� �; — �, — 3aE � vo= vr- am �IncvbN �npN 2LLAUs . MM u cL E v o 04 O c c ffi �, c v E E vU E `" N oL �'cLV •� v y •`_'_ L ra-E W L O EL v v 0 0-moo ° O v O O O L v 0 O G� v b a, N v R N E v 7 E 7 0 v a3 v Q HV C � a V UV ro �VL 2 mP- U U E 7 > W= 0 v m � r ro i L C v � � -C 7 Q C 7 • E E E ro v r N Y o 3 H U rn O b N ON a �_ VV N0' U I� I v -M ` T /�� ZE - V if1 U Jb� �� o V O ao w cc, C� IL. ° �n F- =0� 2 Lr) Q V M M O V O c 7 C) Le) r6 W = U ° U3 ro p z u �_ 0 v �_ roL C C �n� o O ro f4 C N O E > O U�Sii RCN YY mco V U d w d w v °� c c E n L 4 O -E a V v • — L�` v v DO �> > 'O N O v ro c U N 3 E T C 7 C L v ro C e >> �—° v ° �•' o v E ° y ro c �-2 ro �� ow • °� v E 7 Y T > E a u 3 f �o vM Vy E75' v o s °o ° � acL � — Lv � U�ti� .Lwr -Y C cy ra ro L Q 3 0 7 •O Q C Y — v N o'p�"".. u1 C O �� � cs s� � ° � ° _ NOOvya� v �0^ o — Lai °� Q °a � GO nc^ N 41 in y r.,. 'O'p 7 C E N 3 0 a� C LU C = - ry m C C v v = C 0 3 T— ro v E v N Y onv ° CL N E ma oV n ° C, n QEV u y°w� °u v a �t °a v v v c v a o a ° ° v nvOrovaQOCV, uroQV >> dE 2E7sQM> Qm 7s COUNCIL WORKSHOP 1) ENVISION MIDWAY 2) COUNCIL RETREAT BRIEFING i i 1 i i COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 40 Fred N. Satterstrom, AICP, Director • PLANNING SERVICES EN T Charlene Anderson, AICP, Manager WASHINGTON Phone: 253-856-5454 Fax: 253-856-6454 Address: 220 Fourth Avenue S. Kent, WA 98032-5895 February 10, 2009 TO: Mayor Suzette Cooke, Council President Debbie Raplee and City Council Members FROM: Gloria Gould-Wessen, AICP, Long Range Planner RE: #CPA-2007-4 / #CPZ-2007-2 Midway Subarea Plan MOTION: No Action — February 17, 2009 Council Workshop INTRODUCTION: Early in 2008, the City of Kent and the City of Des Moines began collaborative planning efforts on the Pacific Highway South transportation corridor (Attachment A). This shared project is called Envision Midway. It is supported by funding from a State of Washington Department of Community Trade and Economic Development (CTED) Competitive Growth Management Act Planning Grant. The deliverables to the State are land use and development regulations that are consistent between Kent and Des Moines, a subarea plan, zoning amendments that include design guidelines and a transit oriented development overlay. Drafts of the deliverables are due June 15, 2009. BACKGROUND: Envision Midway deliverables are founded on extensive public outreach and are guided by a Mission Statement and Goals (Attachment B). Staff and the project's consultants held eight (8) meetings for the public and selected stakeholders who participated in an iterative effort to ensure opportunities to critique and revise the vision. Several land use alternatives were developed, considered, and refined. Further refinements produced Scenario 2.0 and details for three (3) possible Sound Transit Light Rail station locations and rail alignments (Attachment D). The Stakeholders Committee preferred the SR-99 station alternative. At the February 171h meeting, staff will present a revised Scenario 2.0 and focus on the preferred SR-99 light rail station location (Attachment E), discuss unexplored opportunities, and outline next steps. CA\pm: S:\Permit\Plan\COMP_PLAN_AMENDMENTS\2007\CPA-2007-4_MidwaySubareaPlan\COUNCIL\021709_Memo.doc Enc: Attachment A-Study Area Map Attachment B-Mission&Goals Attachment C-Summary of Public Outreach Outcomes Attachment D-Scenario 2.0 Attachment E- Light Rail Station Options cc: Fred N. Satterstrom,AICP,Community Development Director Charlene Anderson,AICP, Planning Manager Gloria Gould-Wessen,AICP,GIs Coordinator/Planner Kim Adams-Pratt,Assistant City Attorney Denise Lathrop, Des Moines Planning Manager Project File ATTA ,, eaya �I Fou^`cHuenTn ry t]", Oq/Aoloy � c Iworxsmp Q Midway Planning Area KENT Study Area Boundary -� � S216TH ST � City Omits f_, Streams Study Area boundary I Jurisdictions g 222ND§T .,13227HD-ST _ Famai w.y Kent u S224THS King Co ny 1 y� SeaTac i " l City of �— Seatac iwy— g t,u�i. f •� rd%% 240TH CihMrcem 924aST _20, 1 99 j S2S4,ST -WTI' RO .1z Pt, _S2 f - t 1 5 262 ST "eYIVY$ 8268 ST tT„p�S�270 ST MaP G-"reled Aug 14,2006 ® Rle SludyA—mxd 272ND$T I Iy nt"'2-W2.SL t Gy of FeI—I We •��.� T.t ��w�..�..�..�SIZZNR�.L.�����.� UY OIKM �.3�.w� ' ATTACHMENT B February 17, 2009 City Council Workshop Envision Midway Mission Statement & Goals The guiding principles for the Envision Midway Project were developed through a Joint Advisory Committee made up of Council Members of the Kent Planning & Economic Development Committee and the Des Moines Financial & Economic Development Committee. This Advisory Committee also defined the study area and agreed upon the make-up of a Stakeholders Committee. An interlocal agreement between the two cities, signed in May 2008, solidified the commitment created through the Envision Midway Joint Advisory Committee and the State CTED grant. Mission Statement: To transform the Midway community into a sustainable urban area which enhances commercial development and optimizes its geographic location, wide range of transportation options, educational institutions, and views. Goals: 1. Provide a mix of land uses that increase revenues, job opportunities, and housing choices. 2. Reconcile development standards along the border between the Cities of Kent and Des Moines to be consistent and reflect the vision for the study area. 3. Provide for public participation in the development of land use policies, development regulations, and implementation strategies within the study area. 4. Provide appropriate land uses and regulations that support Bus Rapid Transit within the Pacific Highway corridor. 5. Identify preferred alignments for light rail and the associated station and stop locations within Kent and Des Moines. 6. Ensure design that provides a safe and inviting pedestrian environment. I S WermtWlan�COMP PLAN_AMENDMENTS�2007�CPA-2007-4_MldwaySubareaPlan\COUNCIL�021709_AttchB_MissionGoals doc ATTACHMENT C City Council Workshop February 17, 2009 Envision Midway Public Outreach Schedule & Summary of Outcomes A major component of the Midway Subarea Plan is public outreach. A series of meetings were held during 2008 to consider land uses, development standards, light rail station locations and rail alignments within the Midway Study Area. Meetings were held with the general public and selected stakeholder groups which were guided by the project's Mission Statement and Goals. Each meeting built on the previous group's outcomes. In an effort to be informative, transparent, and solicit public comment outside the scheduled meetings, a project website was developed. Additional information not provided here can be found at www,EnvisionMidway.com. Summaries of the public outreach meetings are presented chronologically below: Public Outreach Meetings: May 28, 2008 Public Open House - This meeting introduced the public to the project, provided printed materials about Transit Oriented Development (TOD), the proposed light rail, and expansion of SR-509. Boards were created to solicit public comment on how Midway is being used today, what is missing, what is positive or negative about the place, and what types of new development respondents like (i.e., tall buildings, landscaping, open space, sidewalk cafes, etc.). Generally, they use Midway, but would like a greater night life; the potential views and proximity to I-5 and SeaTac Airport are a plus; Highline Community College (HCC) is a huge asset that should have a bigger presence; people were excited about tall buildings if designed right and light rail; and they wanted to ensure that affordable workforce housing was not diminished overall as a result of redevelopment. May 21, 2008 Stakeholders - Stakeholders heard the results from the public open house and were asked to focus on circulation within the Midway Study Area. Stakeholders identified the importance of connectivity for pedestrians, particularly east/west, inability to cross SR-99, and SR-99 not a pedestrian friendly environment. They said that an attractive pedestrian environment with lighting, benches, shorter blocks, covered walkways, public spaces, and interesting windows is needed to support a "cafe society". They identified the need for better transit connections to surrounding communities, Kent Station, and expand park & ride and de-emphasize parking. June 18, 2008 Stakeholders - Staff presented the concepts of TOD and the meeting focus was on development opportunities and where TOD nodes might be located. The following are the results represented geographically. Midway Area: Parking and vehicular circulation is an issue; need restaurant, services, and allied health facilities that support HCC) safety and attractiveness are important. Kent-Highlands: High-rise building with housing, hotel, or auto-oriented office with supporting commercial uses; connect area with the Green River. Salt Air: Reuse the Midway Landfill as world class indoor/outdoor sporting area; place urban village around facility; support a mixed income multi-cultural mixed-use community. Woodmont: Focus on the Redondo & Woodmont shopping center with infill at 4 to 5 stories; no office here; and need for recreational opportunities. Page 1 of 2 ATTACHMENT C City Council Workshop February 17, 2009 July 9, 2008 Public Workshop - The intent of meeting was to consider the potential for change, what it would look like, and how possible light rail stations locations might affect change. These questions were considered geographically. Midway: This is a place for a wide mix of uses because of the views, proximity to I-5, and HCC; build high-rise buildings, stand alone condos, townhouses, and not single-family residences; it is a place for TOD; and a need to connect the communities to the east and north with an overpass (I-5 and SR-516). Kent-Highlands: Place for conference center with associated recreation. Salt Air: Build Midway Landfill into a regional recreational facility surrounded by 4-5 story residential; and a need for better east/west pedestrian connections across SR-99 or auto- oriented development will prevail. Woodmont: The wetland is an asset for public access; hard to promote a pedestrian-oriented environment; and the need for more retail along SR- 99 was questioned. July 30, 2008 Developers Forum - Developers reviewed three (3) land use alternatives that were derived from previous public meetings. There was consensus to create higher density of uses at nodes around the transit stations and preserve the auto-oriented slightly industrial uses existing along SR-99. They identified the need to assemble land; suggested government build workforce housing to prime redevelopment; allow the market to decide height, bulk and parking requirements; and market the nodes to spur development. Input from the developers produced land use Scenario 1.0. September 24, 2008 Stakeholders - The purpose was to consider and refine land use Scenario 1.0 and reflect on comments from Developers Forum. The discussion identified new constraints (i.e., 110 volt high voltage transmission lines), need to tie the communities together, develop a special TOD character, and where the light rail station should be located. No decision on light rail placement was intended, however, I-5 was identified as a poor location and there was healthy discussion of the pros and cons of the SR-99 and 30th Ave locations. October 15, 2008 Public Workshop - The intent of the meeting was to refine land use Scenario 1.0 and explore design of a future TOD. Safety improvements were seen as key to redevelopment. Connectivity of new light rail with surrounding communities was discussed as was the need for a better pedestrian environment. Bridging the community east of Midway over I-5 was seen as relieving congestion around SR-516 as well as providing a safe multimodal option. There was a straw vote on the preferred light rail alignment which varied widely based on several votes taken. SR-99 and 30th Ave alignments were preferred over 1-5. November 12, 2008 Stakeholders - The purpose was to review and refine land use Scenario 2.0, consider design and bulk of new buildings within a Midway TOD, and identify a preferred light rail alignment that would be brought forward to the decision makers of Kent and Des Moines. Extensive discussion on the merits of each station location and alignment preceded the vote. Due to controversy over the rail alignment, participants decided to vote as prescribed by staff (5 dots per person placed on one or all options) and additionally indicate a preferred rail alignment explaining why on sticky-notes. SR-99 was the preferred station location (50 dots) and alignment, followed by 30th Ave (15 dots), and I-5 (4 dots). S \Permit\Plan\COMP PLAN AMENOMENTS12007\CPA-2007-4_MidwaySubareaPlan\COUNCIL1021709_AttchC SummaryPublicMeet doc Page 2 of 2 I I ATTACHMENT D February 17,2009 City Council Workshop S. treet t Scenario 2.0 216th S . , __ ,, �.. i Transit Oriented Village rt •High Intensity transit supportive mixed-use with ` f residential bias t •Strongly pedestrian oriented with small walkable blocks Pacific Ridge •35'to 200'height limit ti �- '�' I •Minimal parking requirement 's ✓ 1 •Uses: *. vi •Market rate and affordable housing <office S.224ds Street' a. Retail Hotel , =Neighborhood services <Civic uses •No single use,big box,industrial,or auto-dependent uses Mixed Use-Pacific Ridge a 6 Kent Highlands a •Auto-accommodating community and citywide retail and services •Pedestrian oriented Fj. • - i;, ,1 ` a •Mixed use with office or residentialr - Highlands, •35'to 85'Commercial height limit ,` �; f de ',t :Landfill •35'to 200'Residential height limit d �� , t !Use Midway • r. ) I <Residendal = .r Community,citywide and regional retail ^xFw H(ghlln¢ Y 1 i <Office t ^ '$ Coftstntomty`��' Hotel • �College.. I 1 i , ..'1 QMixed Use-Kent Highlands S. 40thStreet •Auto-accommodating community retail and , y services o� � � � •Mixed use with residential o f fi •200'height limit •Uses: r� .,.. • _ i _..; Residential community Retail Alternate BRT Station Hotel Highway Highway Commercial �n Corridor Salt Air •Wide range of community,citywide, or regional serving commercial and n light Industrial uses ` 3 r •Primarily auto-dependent tt" ^ S.252nd Street uses,with minimal pedestrian t ` orientation •35'to 50'height limit Legend •Uses: r •Regional and citywide retail ) g tywi � _: ED Open Space Framework ^Automobile sales and service I ' Light Industrial and M Green Streets manufacturing Trucking euc:�Circulation Framework •Outdoor smra o Office g S.260th street 000 Pedestrian&Bicycle Paths •Flex•tech QQ Proposed BRT Stations(Metro) •Mixed use(on wrest side) -Uve-work Alternate BRT Stations Woodmon '� I ' t institutional Q Proposed Secondary Bus Stops •Institutional mixed use ✓residential or office W¢tiandst •Uses: .✓ _' «, College academic 1 ' - ;- ;1E 09 Vi si O/'f�'x' ^College oriented renii f ,J� •_ ,R '�<'•- "''� =college oriented office =Student and faculty { ' f -_S i rental housing ;}r p l l =t a t MIDWAY a collaborative plannlag project i V I S.272nd street I I ATTACHMENT E February 17,2009 - i s City Council Workshop r` i� � i " ✓ V/ /C�hlf ) 3 j l ✓ .�-' MIDWAY �y f� WA [ r a tollaboraCivt planaiag projttt T� Revised Midway Light Rail Station Area Concept:SR 99 4 Pros: ;1•:,i,,x Removes conflict with autos t "JI Removes conflict with commerce ATM= Provides fast service k,n Fits into existing high capacity transportation corridor p Convenient E/W METRO link G • Provides E/W pedestrian link across SR-99 (overpass or at-grade) g r z�xnx•« r 'I: Supports major employment center(HCC) € j' awae Enhances HCC campus High development potential in 114 mile radius Allows business at station's ground level �� ats mn Pedestrian overpass eases traffic conflicts (' No righc-of-way(ROW)purchase for 30th Ave RedavGn.• r Preserves intimate feel of 30th Ave'Great Street' 6 s [ r ) i A raa Fra+e<g¢ ) s �>. Cons: Need to acquire ROW Narrow lots made smaller by ROW purchase i edlege ti Need to reconfigure access to properties t f ,' Impact to pedestrian environment Long pedestrian crossing at-grade of SR-99 Intersection E t Fast rail speed disconnects riders from passing community ✓dEoma� r � �q ( i ,C., r Park , H gh Tfonvposiak 4i dx_�, _ e�-•s, Q' 3 Q.C. I Sd :rime ,25'u6adl y' -Sm¢a ramRy�, I Midway Light Rail Station Area Concept:30th Avenue South Midway Light Rail Station Area Concept 1-5 PR. .<r C-enkn1<o.mkt wnn,eter __- N wm�han reel • e<m<e I y. d I•N iltem¢We Nh ¢ • v METRO Gr 4 from 45 gy„"� { k <oMdorfor ill •Conve�knt MOV drk lrem l�5 :eyed '� \ •New 8n41w Dea Mo 8 i fff[ \ nelgnborl,�aat w¢,< _ ` Kent werSR-SIB ' bh \ ` lX�� ono< ds whh �•-• yam, •l Rt v/ ��•"r'> •E.<eed IH nine ra6,u to m+lor F y�= ,l' d+ puling rommunry S'�- f/F \ empbymentcente Dou HC CC) °fir L i •RoNdes EM/peeler o� .Y' b" 11..w • na enMn<e HCC anpm '� • kn4 rt grade awu SR 99 _ , a •L¢cb WAmty to re$anil vamparatlon :T orridorSR�99 •5u pleymen<penter(HCC) _ , •&Inge ngbnal tnlfc Nto nUghhorMod ? {V1WJ - r1 '^ Hb .1I y •N�dm«,o-e.l Row •Cemenlen¢HEfRO �yW v •Reducer de.ebPment povntlil by R.from 45 —� � In In 114 mde odor •Comenienc •Uphll Wilk br Pe,e geing were {t.. Rnk Irom 45 I 1 M¢y requme vanvt riwtJe for �r E ' 1 '"i £i?. �4•�Rr s No Fnpa SR19 ':} r y I r ! rider sM1ro,e<ce,v F4�w , f i �•No�lmpaa m 5R 99 �1'l" � '` � (` it e P t Av a i '11 r tlmPrwanmu 4"�•'r � g '5 t`1Mt ,Goner - ,.� ro Mgt •Pro.IMryto vehkuh R r � �( C •Reducer Rut vemce 1 y �� dol.uo 1 boyhood # !u a R,1ng,METRO Irks i FF ,reNd,.berhood i 4 5• -F���@® g�catnt ROW •C dY 4kD Mo & mrrid�or[R11 -- ^''` n / { Y •Doe �, 4 l ex.A.•'f" m .S1d8 ^R _hh hgh potmtW by ID D,wmfl b, I' ATTACHMENT E February 17, 2009 City Council Workshop Revised Midway Light Rail Station Area Concept: SR 99 N i � f HtghYdage7rsnsmuslon� '�� )G ' U.e(,W.25'setU}i)f)"„ i r € La Plaza n4 Shopping CenterJTV Slnje Family r t TM Linear Open Space M. c u S.234th Streetvt Metro Pai_ ¢; /Structured Parking' (500 spaces) o� s Station �( w 1 Pedestrlar Spine — t 1 •-.:o.. F� ��tits �.. ^- ,i 1 Retail Frontage (crosshatch) Proposed Re gonal Detention Facill , t CotrlRtunity ry." College f )fill AT' 4 Street `"-hY?x "" ? Low Densky` :. m .. �" MUId,Famlly � "� � ?• towe's � �� _ 4 Parkslde —t Park f, Higher age Transmission }T 3tTne"(i: L5'setback) to 1 $i 1�, Y n $Ingle l-amlly / " Single Family S 246th Street s 011 i a i CHANGES TO THE AGENDA Citizens wishing to address the Council will, at this time, make known the subject of interest, so all may be properly heard. A) FROM COUNCIL, ADMINISTRATION, OR STAFF B) FROM THE PUBLIC i I PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS A) PUBLIC RECOGNITION n, ]&&N B) COMMUNITY EVENTS C) 1ULIA PATTERSON 2008 RECAP D) INTRODUCTION OF APPOINTEES �'twa8A t u,6 0/1 ,� - - 1'� ) co u n�, �,�vv p►2� E) PUBLIC SAFETY REPORT 5+�-ac Kent City Council Meeting Date February 17, 2009 Category Public Hearings - 5A 1. SUBJECT: SURPLUS UTILITY PROPERTY ON FRAGER ROAD, RESOLUTION 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: At the close of this Public Hearing, staff recommends Council adopt a resolution surplusing five (5) buildings and 184 ecology blocks on surface water utility property located at 24955 Frager Road S. Fair market value for the cost of removal for the buildings will be determined by responses to a published Request for Offers to Purchase. The Public Works Director has determined that the cost to remove of the ecology blocks is equal to or exceeds any residual value. 3. EXHIBITS: Public Works Memorandum dated 2/2/09 and Resolution 1 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? X Revenue? Minimum - unknown Currently in the Budget? Yes X No 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: A. Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds to close the public hearing. B. Councilmember 1�fflmoves, Councilmember 4i)-seconds to adopt Resolution No. 1900 D0 surplusing five (5) buildings and approximately one hundred and eighty-four (184) ecology blocks and authorizing the Public Works Director to dispose them for fair market �v,,all�uee,, if any. DISCUSSION: N^�� ACTION: P 21 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Larry R. Blanchard, Public Works Director Phone: 253-856-5500 Fax: 253-856-6500 KENT W A S H I N G T O N Address: 220 Fourth Avenue S. Kent, WA. 98032-5895 Date: February 2, 2009 To: Chair Deborah Ranniger and Public Works Committee PW Committee Meeting Date: February 2, 2009 From: Mike Mactutis, Environmental Engineer Manager Through: Larry R. Blanchard, Public Works Director Subject: Surplus Stormwater Utility Property - Frager Road MOTION: Move to recommend that Council set February 17, 2009 for public hearing and thereafter adopt a resolution, in a form similar to that presented to the Committee, that would surplus surface water utility buildings and ecology blocks and authorize the Public Works Director to dispose same for fair market value, if any. Summary: RCW 35.94.040 requires a public hearing and resolution to surplus utility property with terms that are in the public interest. The City of Kent surface water utility owns five buildings and approximately one hundred and eighty four (184) ecology blocks on city real property located at 24955 Frager Road S., in King County. The City's Public Works Director has determined that the buildings and ecology blocks are surplus to the needs of the city and, in fact, are negative improvements as the property is designated for surface water utility use and Salmon Recovery Board funding requires that the property be cleared. The cost of removal of the buildings may be equal to their value as salvage. Staff is seeking to avoid demolition and hauling to the landfill by offering the buildings for intact relocation. Responses to the offer for sale will establish fair market value, if any, for the buildings. The time and location for relocation and reestablishment will be regulated for any buildings to be relocated to Kent. Any of the buildings that cannot be sold for relocation will be demolished in the course of site restoration work. The ecology blocks have no residual value because the cost of removal exceeds any fair market value and will be sold for reuse or transferred for other city uses. BUDGET IMPACT: None U:P W CW ctionpg\2009\SulplusUtilityPropertyFragerRdFeb0209.doc RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, determining that certain buildings and ecology blocks on surface water utility property are surplus to the City's needs, that such buildings and ecology blocks may be conveyed, and establishing the consideration therefore. RECITALS A. The City of Kent ("City") surface water utility owns five buildings and approximately one hundred and eighty four (184) ecology blocks on city real property located at 24955 Frager Road S. in King County as approximately shown on Exhibit 1. B. The City's Public Works Director has determined that the buildings and ecology blocks are surplus to the needs of the city and, in fact, are negative improvements as the property is designated for surface water utility use. C. Fair market value or the cost of removal for the buildings will be determined by responses to a published Request for Offers to Purchase. The Director has determined that the cost of the removal of the ecology blocks is equal to or exceeds any residual value. 1 Surplus Surface Water Utility Property 2009 Resolution I i I D. RCW 35.94.040 requires that the City determine, after a public hearing and by resolution of the City Council, that the buildings and utility blocks herein described, originally acquired with public utility funds, are surplus to the City's needs and should be leased, sold, or conveyed. i E. The City Council held a public hearing on Tuesday, February 17, 2009 at a regularly scheduled City Council meeting and invited comments regarding the City's intention to surplus and convey ownership of the buildings and ecology blocks herein described. { i NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: RESOLUTION G SECTION 1. - Recitals Incorporated. The foregoing recitals are incorporated and fully made a part of this resolution. 1 I SECTION 2. - Buildings and Ecology Blocks Deemed Surplus. The buildings shown approximately on Exhibit 1 along with approximately one hundred eighty four (184) ecology blocks, originally acquired with public utility funds, are not needed for utility purposes and are deemed surplus to the city's needs. f SECTION 3. - Public's Best Interest. It is in the public's best interest that ownership of the buildings and ecology blocks be conveyed so that they can be removed from the property in preparation for its use for I utility purposes. It is further in the public's best interest that the buildings be relocated intact if possible so long as they are lawfully situated within a reasonable time, if relocated within the city limits. Z Surplus Surface Water Utility Property 2009 Resolution f SECTION 4. - Consideration to be Paid. Consideration for the removal of the buildings will be established by responses, if any, to the City's Request for Offers to Purchase the buildings. Consideration is not required for the ecology blocks, given that they have no net market value. SECTION 5. - Authority. The Public Works Director is authorized to convey ownership of the buildings and to minimize to the extent possible both the cost of removing them and the impact of such removal on landfill capacity, upon final terms and conditions acceptable to the City Attorney. The Director is authorized to demolish by public works contract any of the buildings that are not subject to sale. Buildings will be sold upon the condition that they will be lawfully situated within a reasonable time if relocated within the City limits and upon the condition that there are no warranties. The Public Works Director is further authorized to transfer ownership of the ecology blocks, to convey them for another City use, or to otherwise dispose of them in the public interest. SECTION 6. - Effective Date. This resolution shall take effect and be in force immediately upon its passage. PASSED at a regular open public meeting by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, this day of , 2009. CONCURRED in by the Mayor of the City of Kent this day of , 2009. SUZETTE COOKE, MAYOR ATTEST: 3 Surplus Surface Water Utility Property 2009 Resolution I I BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK 'i APPROVED AS TO FORM: I TOM BRUBAKER, CITY ATTORNEY I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of Resolution No. passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, the day of , 2009. i BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK I P:\Civil\Rcsolulion\SurplusProperty-Fragcr Road.docx I� I� l I 4 Surplus Surface Water Utility Property 2009 Resolution i i 50 0 50 100 0G SCALE: 1" = 100' dov a GA GE a q { OFFICE ® BUILDING HOUSE O I O= CITY OF KENT SHOP 232204-9029� BUILDING KENT CITY LIMITS CARPORT KING COUNTY z a ES FLD) to ECOLOGY DES-MO`N BLOCKS (TYP) R5 6 kwexA S LOWER GREEN RIVER 24955 FRAGER ROAD S. PROPERTY ACQUISITION/ SURPLUS PROPERTY SITE PLAN KIENTTT T.L. 232204-9029 DOWNEY FARMSTEAD RESTORATION CITY OF KENT 5CALE 1• = too' EXHIBft ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DATE 12/2008 1 Kent City Council Meeting Date February 17. 2009 Item No. 6A - 6B CONSENT CALENDAR 6. City Council Action: rCouncilmember Lmoves, Councilmember evl� seconds to approve Con nt Calendar Items A through`. K Discussion ' Action mc� 6A. Approval of Minutes. Approval of the minutes of the regular Council meeting of February 3, 2009. 6B. Approval of Bills. ' No numbers were available. 1 r t r ® Kent City Council Meeting KENT DIVAS HIN6TON February 3, 2009 The regular meeting of the Kent City Council was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Cooke. Councilmembers present: Albertson, Clark, Danielson, Harmon, Ranniger, Raplee, and Thomas. (CFN-198) CHANGES TO THE AGENDA A. From Council, Administration, Staff. (CFN-198) No changes were made. B. From the Public. (CFN-198) Continued Communications Item A was added at the request of Patrick Dzurcanin. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS A. Public Recognition. (CFN-198) Mayor Cooke introduced Sirimala Panpradith, a student who has been job shadowing her. B. Community Events. (CFN-198) No community events were announced. C. Employee of the Month. (CFN-147) Police Chief Strachan introduced the February Employee of the Month, Marla Platt, and said she exemplifies all of the City's values. D. City Historian. (CFN-198) It was noted that this matter will be moved forward to a future meeting. E. Economic Development Report. (CFN-825) Ben Wolters reported that there are many building projects in various stages, and that business is increasing in down- town restaurants. F. Legislative Report. (CFN-198) Michelle Witham gave an update on the status of various legislative matters including levees, street utilities, prostitution, Safe Havens, streamlined sales tax, and annexation funding. CONSENT CALENDAR Raplee moved to approve Consent Calendar Items A through P. Clark seconded and the motion carried. A. Approval of Minutes. (CFN-198) Minutes of the regular Council meeting of January 20, 2009, were approved. B. Approval of Bills. (CFN-104) Payment of the bills received through December 31 and paid on December 31, 2008, after auditing by the Operations Committee on January 20, 2009, were approved. 1 I Kent City Council Minutes February 3, 2009 I Approval of checks issued for vouchers: Date Check Numbers Amount 12/31/08 Wire Transfers 3544-3562 $1,812,907.50 12/31/08 Regular Checks 627901-628413 4,379,885.58 Use Tax Payable 812.23 $6,193,605.31 Void and Reissue Interim Batch 1/5/09 Void Advice 241983,241994,242241 ($40,413.62) Reissue Checks 309593,309594 & 309595 15,229.76 ($25,183.86) Checks issued for payroll for January 1 through January 15 and paid on January 20, 2009, were approved: Date Check Numbers Amount 1/20/09 Checks 309596-309876 $ 218,236.60 1/20/09 Advices 242670-243440 1,918,141.85 $2,136,378.45 �t C. 2009 Government Relations Consulting Services Agreement with Outcomes by Levy. (CFN-1216) The Mayor was authorized to sign an agreement with Outcomes by Levy in the amount of $63,600 for lobbying services, and ratify all I acts consistent with the terms of the agreement. D. Federal Lobbyist Agreement with Van Ness Feldman. (CFN-1216) The Mayor was authorized to sign an agreement with Van Ness Feldman in the amount of $90,000 for federal lobbying services, and ratify all acts consistent with the terms of the agreement. I E. Kent Downtown Partnership Agreement. (CFN-462) The Mayor was authorized to sign an agreement with the Kent Downtown Partnership for economic development services in the amount of $33,600. F. Conflict Public Defense Services Agreement Amendment No. One. (CFN-234) The Mayor was authorized to execute Amendment No. 1 to the Conflict Public Defense Services Agreement with Jordan Law Offices which extends the contract term through December 31, 2009, and the Human Services Manager was authorized to extend the Agreement for two additional one-year terms. G. Public Defense Services Agreement Amendment No. Three. (CFN-234) The Mayor was authorized to execute Amendment No. 3 to the Public Defense Services Agreement with Stewart, Beall, MacNichols, and Harmell which extends the contract term through December 31, 2011. H. 2009 City Art Plan and 2009-2013 Five Year City Art Plan. (CFN-815) The 2009 City Art Plan and the Five Year City Art Plan for 2009-2013, was approved. j i 2 Kent City Council Minutes February 3, 2009 I. 4Culture Landmark Heritage Grant Agreement for Earthworks Mill Creek Park Renovation. (CFN-119/118) The 2008 Landmark Challenge Grant from 4Culture was accepted, expenditure of the necessary matching funds in the amount of $13,875 for restoration of Earthworks Mill Creek Park was authorized, and the Mayor was authorized to sign all necessary documents to accept the grant and spend its proceeds. J. Russell Road Maintenance Facility Roof and Wall Improvements Change Order No. Four. (CFN-120) The Mayor was authorized to sign Change Order No. 4 with Werlech Construction in the amount of $179,203.63 for additional services essential to complete the Russell Road Maintenance Facility Roof and Wall Improvements Project. K. Fourth Quarter Fee-In-Lieu Funds. (CFN-118) The $80,615.00 in fee-in-lieu funds for the fourth quarter of 2008 was accepted, and the expenditure of funds in the Morrill Meadows Park, Lake Fenwick Park, Wilson Playfields, and 272"d St. Park budgets was amended. L. Contractor Parking Exemption Ordinance. (CFN-171) Ordinance No. 3908 amending Section 9.38.170 of the Kent City Code to authorize temporary parking permits for contractor use while engaging in City contract work within Residential Parking Zones was adopted. M. Downey Farmstead Restoration Project/Salmon Recovery Funding Board Agreement. (CFN-1038) The Mayor was authorized to sign the Salmon Project Agreement with the Salmon Recovery Funding Board (SRFB) in the amount of $150,000, subject to final terms and conditions acceptable to the City Attorney. N. Ordinance Amending Flood Hazard Regulations. (CFN-961) Ordinance No. 3909 amending Chapter 14.09 of the Kent City Code making floodplain manage- ment and compliance provisions consistent with state and federal regulations was adopted. O. Local Hazardous Waste Management Program Contract Amendment. (CFN-738) The Mayor was authorized to sign an amendment to the Local Hazardous Waste Management Program (LHWMP) contract agreement for 2008/2009 in the amount of $24,413.91, and staff was directed to accept the grant and establish a budget for the funds to be spent within said project, subject to final agreement terms and conditions acceptable to the City Attorney and the Public Works Director. P. Northwest Hydraulics Consultants Contract for Levee Study. (CFN-1038) The Mayor was authorized to sign a contract with Northwest Hydraulic Consultants in an amount not to exceed $49,802 to conduct analyses of levee alternatives to reduce the negative effect of recent FEMA mapping of potential flooding in the Lower Green River Valley, subject to final agreement terms and conditions acceptable to the City Attorney and the Public Works Director. 3 Kent City Council Minutes February 3, 2009 i OTHER BUSINESS A. Howard Hanson Dam Update. (CFN-1038) Deputy Public Works Director LaPorte explained that a sinkhole has been found in the Howard Hanson Dam, and gave an overview of the situation. Deputy Fire Chief Marzano noted that the City is working with the Cities of Auburn, Renton, and Tukwila on emergency services, and that they are meeting tomorrow with the Corps of Engineers and various agencies such as the Red Cross to develop an operational action plan. He and LaPorte then answered questions from Council members. BIDS A. Riverbend Golf Course Fence. (CFN-118) The bid opening was held on January 26, 2009, with nine bids received. Parks Director Watling noted that this is the final phase of the reconstruction of the Green River Levy Project, and recommend awarding the bid to the low bidder, All Around Fence Company. Ranniger moved to authorize the Mayor to sign an agreement with All Around Fence Company in the amount of $135,048, excluding Washington State Sales Tax, to complete the Riverbend Golf Complex Fencing Project, subject to final agreement terms and conditions acceptable to the City Attorney. Clark seconded and the motion carried. B. Riverbend Golf Course Tree Planting. (CFN-118) The bid opening for the Riverbend Golf Complex Tree Planting Project was held on January 26, 2009, with thirteen bids received. Parks Director Watling explained the project and recom- mended award to the low bidder, The Brickman Group. Ranniger moved to authorize the Mayor to enter into an agreement with The Brickman Group in the amount of $54,410, excluding Washington State Sales Tax, to complete the Riverbend Golf Complex Tree Planting Project, subject to final agreement terms and conditions acceptable to the City Attorney. Clark seconded and the motion carried. REPORTS A. Council President. (CFN-198) No report was given. B. Mayor. (CFN-198) No report was given. C. Operations Committee. (CFN-198) No report was given. D. Parks and Human Services Committee. (CFN-198) No report was given. E. Planning and Economic Development Committee. (CFN-198) Albertson noted that the next meeting will be held at 5:00 p.m. on Tuesday, February 9, and that there will be an update on the Shoreline Master Plan at that time. F. Public Safety Committee. (CFN-198) Harmon noted that the next meeting will be held on Tuesday, February 10, at 5:00 p.m. G. Public Works Committee. (CFN-198) No report was given. r I 4 i 1 Kent City Council Minutes February 3, 2009 H. Administration. (CFN-198) Hodgson reminded Councilmembers of an Executive Session to discuss one item of property negotiation and two items of pending litigation. He added that no action is needed when the meeting reconvenes, and estimated the length of the Executive Session at 25 minutes. CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS A. Celebrity Event at ShoWare. (CFN-1305) Patrick Dzurcanin, representing the Greg Haugen Foundation, explained that the organization fights autism and pre- sented the City an opportunity to host a major celebrity charity event annually at the ShoWare Center. He outlined the goals of the Foundation and explained that the charity event would be composed of live world class boxing, legends of boxing, and a televised broadcast. EXECUTIVE SESSION The meeting recessed to Executive Session at 7:50 p.m. and reconvened at 8:50 p.m. (CFN-198) ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 8:50 p.m. (CFN-198) Brenda Jacober, CMC City Clerk 5 Kent City Council Meeting Date February 17, 2009 Category Consent Calendar - 6C 1. SUBJECT: HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS - CONFIRM 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Confirm the Mayor's appointment of Yadira Brito and Carla Loux to the Human Services Commission. Yadira Brito will fill the vacancy left by Cathy Peters and Carla Loux will fill the service club representative vacancy. Both terms will expire on January 1, 2012. 3. EXHIBITS: Memorandum 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Mayor Cooke (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? N/A Revenue? N/A Currently in the Budget? Yes No 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: 1 OFFICE OF THE MAYOR Suzette Cooke, Mayor Phone:253-856-5700 Fax: 253-856-6700 Address: 220 Fourth Avenue S. KEN T Kent,WA 98032-5895 W A 5 H I NGTON i TO: Debbie Raplee, Council President City Council Members 1;. FROM: Suzette Cooke, Mayor ` DATE: February 3, 2009 RE: Appointments to Human Services Commission i' { I am requesting your approval of my appointments of Yadira Brito and Carla Loux to the Human Services Commission. Ms. Brito is a resident of the Park Orchard neighborhood that is in the potential annexation area that Council is currently considering. Yadira is very active in the Kent community, she volunteers weekly at the Holy Spirit Church, works part-time for the Kent Downtown Partnership and has been involved in many community events such as Winterfest, Wine Women and WOW, and Spring into Art. Yadira takes great pride assisting the Kent community with clean-up efforts in the downtown area. While Yadira is currently a student, she displays great dedication to her community through her involvement. Yadira's would like appointment to the l Human Services Commission representing Holy Spirit Church. t Carla Loux is a longtime resident of Kent and remains very active in community affairs. Carla is a member of Soroptimist International of Kent, the Kent Downtown Partnership and the Kent Historical Society. She not only volunteers her time for membership events, she also volunteers for the Toys for Joy program that Kent Fire sponsors each year. Carla stated that she would like to gain a better understanding of the scope of needs in her community and actively assist in addressing those needs to promote a better quality of life for everyone. Ms. Brito will fill a vacancy on the Commission following Cathy Peter's departure and Ms. Loux will fill an open position representing service clubs. Both Mr. Brito's and Ms. Loux's terms will expire January 1, 2012. i I submit this for your confirmation. I I, Kent City Council Meeting Date February 17, 2009 Category Consent Calendar - 6D 1. SUBJECT: COUNTYWIDE PLANNING POLICIES AMENDMENT RESOLUTION - ADOPT 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Adopt Resolution No. , ratifying the proposed amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies (CPP) approved under County Growth Management Planning Council Motions Nos. 08-5, 08-6, and 08-7, as well as map amendment 29, amending the Interim Potential Annexation Area Map, amending the Urban Growth Area in King County, and designating a new Urban Separator. 3. EXHIBITS: Resolution, staff memo dated 2/2/09, with attachments 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Planning & Economic Development Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? No Revenue? No Currently in the Budget? Yes No 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, ratifying the King County Countywide Planning Policies adopted by the Metropolitan King County Council and pursuant to the Growth Management Act. RECITALS A. The adoption of countywide planning policies are required under the State Growth Management Act (GMA), pursuant to RCW 36.70A.210. The Countywide Planning Policies (CPPs) provide a framework for Kent and other cities in King County to conduct planning under the requirements of GMA. This framework ensures that city and county comprehensive plans are consistent. On December 15, 2008, the Metropolitan King County Council approved and ratified a map amendment to the CPPs, and amendments to the CPPs approved by the Growth Management Planning Council (GMPC). Now the amendments are presented to jurisdictions in King County for ratification. B. On December 15, 2008, the following GMPC motions to amend the CPPs were approved and ratified by the full County Council: 1 Countywide Planning Policies P•\Civil\Rcsoluhon\CountywidcPlannmgPoliciesRatify docx 1. GMPC Motion No. 08-5: Amends the interim Potential Annexation Area map in the Countywide Planning Policies by adding an unincorporated urban area to the City of Maple Valley's Potential Annexation Area. 2. GMPC Motion No. 08-6: a. adds to the Urban Growth Area of King County areas called Carnation, Sammamish, Coal Creek, Enumclaw, Black Diamond, Eastridge Christian Assembly, and Duvall; b. deletes from the Urban Growth Area of King County areas called Rock Creek, Crow Marsh, Dorre Don Reach, DNRP-Kathryn Taylor, Maple Valley, and Black Diamond; C. amends the Interim Potential Annexation Area (PAA) map by including any additional unincorporated urban land created by the Urban Growth Area amendments above, and deleting any land changed from urban to rural from the respective PAA; d. modifies the Potential Annexation Area map in the Countywide Planning Policies regarding the above changes to the Urban Growth Area; and e. designates a new Urban Separator known as Lake Desire. 3. GMPC Motion No. 08-7: Adds to the Urban Growth Area of King County an area called Maple Valley-Summit Pit and modifies the Potential Annexation Area map in the Countywide Planning Policies to add the Summit Pit area to the City of Maple Valley's Potential Annexation Area. C. Also on December 15, 2008, the full County Council adopted Map Amendment 29, which adds to the Urban Growth Area of King County an area called Reserve at Covington Creek and modifies the potential Annexation Area map in the Countywide Planning Policies to add the 2 Countywide Planning Policies P.\Civil\Rcsolution\CountywidcPlammngPolicicsRatify docx Reserve at Covington Creek area to the City of Black Diamond's Potential Annexation Area. D. The King County Council approved and ratified these amendments on behalf of King County pursuant to King County Ordinances No. 16334, No. 16335, and No. 16336. The Kent Planning & Economic Development Committee reviewed these amendments at its meeting on February 9, 2009. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: RESOLUTION SECTION 1. - Amendment. The City of Kent, acting pursuant to the interlocal agreement among King County, the City of Seattle, and incorporated suburban cities, hereby ratifies the proposed amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies as adopted by the Metropolitan King County Council in King County Ordinances No. 16334, No. 16335, and No. 16336, attached and incorporated hereto as Exhibit A. SECTION 2. - Public Inspection. The amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies adopted herein shall be filed with the City Clerk and placed in the planning services office so they are available for inspection by the public. SECTION 3. - Severability. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this resolution is declared unconstitutional or invalid for any reason, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this resolution. 3 Countywide Planning Policies P:\Civil\Resolution\CountywidePlannmgPoliciesRahfy.docx SECTION 4. - Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date of this resolution is hereby ratified and affirmed. SECTION S. - Effective Date. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage. PASSED at a regular open public meeting by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, this day of , 2009. CONCURRED in by the Mayor of the City of Kent this day of , 2009. SUZETTE COOKE MAYOR ATTEST: BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: TOM BRUBAKER, CITY ATTORNEY I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of Resolution No. passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, the day of , 2009. BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK 4 Countywide Planning Policies P.\Crvil\Rcsoluhon\CountywidePlannmgPohcicsRatify docx COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Fred N. Satterstrom, AICP, Director • PLANNING SERVICES K E N T Charlene Anderson,AICP, Manager W A 5 H 1 N O T O N Phone: 253-856-5454 Fax: 253-856-6454 Address: 220 Fourth Avenue S. Kent,WA 98032-5895 February 2, 2009 To: Chair Elizabeth Albertson and Planning & Economic Development Committee Members From: Charlene Anderson, AICP, Planning Manager Subject: Countywide Planning Policies - Amendment King County Council Ordinances No. 16334-16336 MOTION: I move to recommend/not recommend to the full Council ratification of amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies approved under GMPC Motions No. 08-5, 08-6, and 08-07 as well as map amendment 29, amending the interim potential annexation areas map in the countywide planning policies, amending the Urban Growth Area in King County, and designating a new Urban Separator. SUMMARY: The adoption of countywide planning policies is required under the State Growth Management Act (GMA), pursuant to RCW 36.70A.210. The Countywide Planning Policies (CPPs) provide a framework for Kent and other cities in King County to conduct planning under the requirements of GMA. This framework ensures that city and county comprehensive plans are consistent. On December 15, 2008, the Metropolitan King County Council approved and ratified amendments that had been approved by the Growth Management Planning Council (GMPC) and map amendment 29, amending the interim potential annexation areas map and the Urban Growth Area, as well as designating a new Urban Separator. Now the amendments are presented to jurisdictions in King County for ratification. BUDGET IMPACT: None rBACKGROUND: The City of Kent ratified the original CPPs on September 15, 1992, with Resolution No. 1326 and ratified Phase II amendments to the CPPs on November 16, 1994. Over the years, the City has ratified other proposed amendments. Through the Growth Management Planning Council (GMPC), jurisdictions within King County work together to plan for economic and population growth in King County, including consideration of CPPs. The Countywide Planning Policies become effective when ratified by ordinance or resolution of at least 30 percent of the city and county governments representing 70 percent of the population of King County according to the established Interlocal Agreement. A city will be deemed to have ratified the amendments to the CPPs unless the city takes legislative action to disapprove the amendments within 90 days of adoption by King County, which in this case is April 2, 2009. The following GMPC motion to amend the CPPs was approved and ratified by the full County Council on December 15, 2008. GMPC Motion No. 08-5: Amends the interim Potential Annexation Area map in the Countywide Planning Policies by adding an unincorporated urban area to the City of Maple Valley's Potential Annexation Area. GMPC Motion No. 08-6: Adds to the Urban Growth Area of King County areas called Carnation, Sammamish, Coal Creek, Enumclaw, Black Diamond, Eastridge Christian Assembly, and Duvall; deletes from the Urban Growth Area of King County areas j called Rock Creek, Crow Marsh, Dorre Don Reach, DNRP-Kathryn Taylor, Maple Valley, and Black Diamond; modifies the Potential Annexation Area map in the Countywide Planning Policies regarding the above changes to the Urban Growth Area; and designates a new Urban Separator known as Lake Desire. GMPC Motion No. 08-7: Adds to the Urban Growth Area of King County an area called Maple Valley-Summit Pit and modifies the Potential Annexation Area map in the Countywide Planning Policies to add the Summit Pit area to the City of Maple Valley's Potential Annexation Area. Map Amendment 29: Adds to the Urban Growth Area of King County an area called Reserve at Covington Creek and modifies the Potential Annexation Area map in the Countywide Planning Policies to add the Reserve at Covington Creek area to the City of Black Diamond's Potential Annexation Area. Staff will be available at the February 9th meeting to further discuss these amendments. The City of Kent is not affected by any of the proposed amendments. CAWrn :S:\Permit�Plan\COMP PLAN AMENDMENTS\2009\countywide planning policies�cpppedc020909.doc Eric: 1/9/09 letter from Metropolitan King County Council including Ordinances 16334-16336 cc: Fred N. Satterstrom, AICP, C.D Director Charlene Anderson, Planning Manager Project File"Misc." PEDC Meeting February 9, 2009 Page 2of2 King County R C E I V E D JAN 16 709 RECEIVED CITY OF KENT PLANNING SERVICES JAN 12 2009 City of Kent office of the Mayor January 9, 2009 The Honorable Suzette Cooke City of Kent 220-4th Avenue South Kent, WA 98032-5895 Dear Mayor Cooke: We are pleased to forward for your consideration and ratification the enclosed amendments to the King County Countywide Planning Policies (CPP). On December 15, 2008, the Metropolitan King County Council approved and ratified tlw amendments on behalf of unincorporated King County. The Ordinances became effective January 2, 2009. Copies of the King County Council staff reports, ordinances and Growth Management Planning Council motions are enclosed to assist you in your review of these amendments. • Ordinance No. 16334, GMPC Motion Nos. 08-5, 08-6. • Ordinance No. 16335, GMPC Motion No. 08-07. • Ordinance No. 16336, Map Amendment 29 In accordance with the Countywide Planning Policies, FW-1, Step 9, amendments become effective when ratified by ordinance or resolution by at least 30 percent of the city and county governments representing 70 percent of the population of King County according to the intertocal agreement. A city will be deemed to have ratified the amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies unless, within 90 days of adoption by King County, the city takes legislative action to disapprove the amendments. Please note that the'90-day deadline for this amendment is April 2, 2009. If you adopt any legislation relative to this action, please send a copy of the legislation by the close of business, April 2, 2009, to Anne Noris, Clerk of the Council, W1039 King County Courthouse, 516 Third Avenue, Seattle, WA 98104. If you have any questions about the amendments or ratification process, please contact Paul Reitenbach, Senior Policy Analyst, King County Department of Development and Environmental Services, at 206-296-6705, or Rick Bautista, King County Council Staff, at 206-296-0329. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. Sincerely, Julia Patterson, Chair Metropolitan King County Council King County Executive Enclosures cc: King County City Planning Directors Suburban Cities Association Stephanie Warden, Director, Department of Development and Environmental Services (DDES) Paul Reitenbach, Senior Policy Analyst, DDES Rick Bautista, Council Staff, Growth Management & Natural Resources Committee (GM&NR) 0 Courthouse -� KING COUNTY 1 zo King County Co rtho s 516 Third Avenue Seattle,WA 98104 King County Signature Report December 15, 2008 Ordinance 16334 Proposed No. 2008-0620.2 Sponsors Gossett 1 AN ORDINANCE adopting amendments to the 2 Countywide Planning Policies; amending the interim 3 potential annexation areas map and ratifying the amended 4 Countywide Planning Policies for unincorporated King 5 County; and amending Ordinance 10450, Section 3, as 6 amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.030 and Ordinance 10450, 7 Section 4, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.040. 8 9 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY: 10 SECTION 1. )Findings: The council makes the following findings: 11 A. The Growth Management Planning Council met on September 17, 2008 and 12 voted to recommend amendments to the King County Countywide Planning Policies, 13 amending the interim potential annexation areas map as shown in Attachment A to this 14 ordinance to include a portion of unincorporated urban area within the Potential 15 Annexation Area of the city of Maple Valley. The Growth Management Planning 16 Council also voted to recommend amendments to the King County Countywide Planning 1 Ordinance 16334 f , 17 Policies, amending the interim potential annexation areas maps as shown in Attachment 18 B to this ordinance. 19 B. As part of the King County council's review of the 2008 comprehensive plan ii .20 updates, the council considered the recommended amendments set for in Attachment B to 21 this ordinance. In approving the 2008 updates to the King County Comprehensive Plan, 22 the council adopted all of the recommended amendments in Attachment B to this 23 ordinance except for the following: (1)item 12,relating to the expansion of the urban 24 growth area near the I-90/Highway 18 interchange and adding that area to the city of 25 Snoquaimie.'s Potential Annexation Area; and (2) item 14, relating to the expansion of the 26 urban growth area referred to as "Duthie Hill" and adding that area to the city of 27 Sammamish's Potential Annexation Area. 28 SECTION 2. Ordinance 10450, Section 3,as amended,and K.C.C. 20.10.030 are F 29 each hereby amended to read as follows: I 30 A. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide Planning j 31 Policies attached to Ordinance 11446 are hereby approved-and adopted. 32 B. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning 33 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12027. � 34 C. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide Planning F, 35 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12421. 36 D. The Phase II Amendments to'the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning 37 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments 1 and 2 to'Ordinance 13260. s 38 E. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning { 39 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments 1 through 4 to Ordinance 13415. ' �j 2 ' Ordinance 16334 40 F, The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 41 Policies are amended, as shown by Attaclunents 1 through 3 to Ordinance 13858. 42 G. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012—Countywide Planning 43 Policies are amended, as shown by Attaclunent 1 to Ordinance 14390. 44 H. The Phase II Amendments to the King County'2012—Countywide Planning 45 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14391. 46 I. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012—Countywide Planning 47 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14392. 48 1 The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 49 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14652. 50 K. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 51 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 14653. 52 L. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning 53 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14654. 54 M. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 55 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14655. 56 N. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 57 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments 1 and 2 to Ordinance 14656. 58 O. The Phase II amendments to the King County 2012—Countywide Planning 59 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment A to Ordinance 14844. 60 P. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 r Countywide Planning 61 Policies are amended,as shown by Attachments A,B and C to Ordinance 1512L 62 Q. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning 3 Ordinance 16334 63 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment A to Ordinance 15122. 64 R. The Phase,H Amendments to the King County 2012- Countywide Planning 65 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment A to Ordinance 15123. � I 66 S. Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide.Planning 67 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments A and B ao.Ordinance 15426. 68 T. Phase II Amendments,to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning i 69 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments.A,B and C to Ordinance 15709. 70 U. Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning 71 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment A to Ordinance 16056. i 72 V. Phase I1 Amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning i 73 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments A,B, C, D,E and F to Ordinance 16151. 74 W. Phase H Amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide Planning i 75 Policies are amended as shown by Attachment A to this ordinance and those items 76 numbered 1 through 11 13 and 15 as shown on Attachment B to this ordinance are j :77 hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. Those items 78 numbered 12 and 14, shown as struck-through on Attachment B to this ordinance are not 79 ratified. i 80 SECTION 3. Ordinance 10450, Section 4, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.040 are 81 each hereby amended to read as follows: i 82 A. Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 1.0450 for-the purposes I 83 specified,are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of.unincorporated King County. 84 B. The amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies adopted.by Ordinance 85 10840 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. 4 i Ordinance 16334 86 C. The amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 87 11061 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. 88 D. The Phase II amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide Planning 89 Policies adopted by Ordinance 11446 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of 90 unincorporated King County. 91 E. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 92 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12027 are hereby ratified on behalf of the 93 population of unincorporated King County. 94 F. The amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning Policies, as 95 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12421, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 96 population of unincorporated King County. 97 G. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 98 shown by Attachments 1 and 2 to Ordinance 13260, are hereby ratified'on behalf of the 99 population of unincorporated King County. 100 H. The amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning Policies, as 101 shown by Attachment 1 through 4 to Ordinance 13415, are hereby'ratified on behalf of 102 the population of unincorporated King County. 103 I. The amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning Policies, as 104 shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 13858, are hereby ratified on behalf of 105 the population of unincorporated King County. 106 J. The amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide Planning Policies, as 107 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14390, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 108 population of unincorporated King County. 5 I Ordinance 16334 109 K. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 110 shown by Attachment 1.to Ordinance 14391, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 111 population of unincorporated King County. 112 L. The.amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 113 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14392, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 114 population of unincorporated King County. 115 M. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 116 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14652, are hereby ratified on behalf of the I 117 population of unincorporated King County. 118 N. The amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning Policies, as 119 shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 14653, are hereby ratified on behalf of r 120 the population of unincorporated King County. i I 121 O. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 122 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14654, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 123 population of unincorporated King County. I 124 P. The amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Plaiming Policies, as 125 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14655, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 126 population of unincorporated King County. I 127 Q. The,amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide Planning Policies, as 128 shown by Attachments 1 and 2 to Ordinance 14656, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 1 129 population of unincorporated King County. i 6 Ordinance 16334 130 R.. The amendments to the King County 2012—Countywide Planning Policies, as 131 shown by Attachment A to Ordinance 14844, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 132 population of unincorporated King County. 133 S. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 134 shown by Attachments A,B and C to Ordinance 15121, are hereby ratified on behalf of 135 the population of unincorporated King County. 136 T. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 137 shown by Attachment A to Ordinance 15122, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 138 population of unincorporated King County. 139 U. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 140 shown by Attachment A to Ordinance 15123, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 141 population of unincorporated King County, 142 V. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 143 shown by Attachments A and B to Ordinance 15426, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 144 population of unincorporated King County. 145 W. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, 146 as shown by Attachments A, B and C to Ordinance 15709, are hereby ratified on behalf 147 of the population of unincorporated King County. 148 X. The amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning Policies, as 149 shown by Attachment A to Ordinance 16056, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 150 population of unincorporated King County. 151 Y. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 7 Ordinance 16334 - 152 shown by Attachments A,B, C, D, E and F to Ordinance 16151, are hereby ratified on 153 behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. 154 Z. The amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide Planning Policies as i 155 shown by Attachment A to this ordinance and those items numbered 1 through 11 13 156 and 15, as shown on Attachment B to this ordinance are hereby ratified on behalf of the 157 I i I I i 8 Ordinance 16334 158 population of unincorporated King County. Those items numbered 12 and 14 shown as 159 struck-through on Attachment B to this ordinance are not ratified 160 Ordinance 16334 was introduced on 12/8/2008 and passed by the Metropolitan King County Council on 12/15/2008, by the following vote: Yes: 7 -Ms. Patterson, Mr. Constantine, Ms. Lambert, Mr. von Reichbauer, Mr. Ferguson, Mr. Gossett and Mr.Phillips No: 0 Excused: 2 -Mr. Dunn and Ms. Hague KING COUNTY COUNCIL KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON F J �ii Patterson,Chair ATTEST: ry C73 0 C30 T. 01 s 4 t-,-1 Anne Noris,Clerk of the CouncilCz t-0 23 day of ��2008 � APPROVED this — Ron Sims,County Executive Attachments A.Motion 08-5, B.Motion 08-6 9 9/17/08 Sponsored By: Executive Committee /pr • I 1 MOTION NO. 08-5 2 A MOTION to amend the interim Potential Annexation Area 3 map in the Countywide Planning Policies. 5 i 6 7 WHEREAS, Countywide Planning Policies LU 31 and LU-32 anticipate the collaborative ! 8 designation of Potential.Annexation Areas(PAA)and the eventual annexation of these j f 9 areas by cities. 10 11 WHEREAS, the attached PAA map amendment removes an unincorporated urban area not 12 within the PAA of any city and adds this area to the City of Maple Valley FAA, 13 14 WHEREAS,the attached PAA map amendment is supported by the City of Maple Valley j is and King County. I 16 17 BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLANNIIJG COUNCIL OF 18 KING COUNTY HEREBY MOVES AS FOLLOWS: f 19 20 21 1. Amend the Interim Potential Annexation Area Map by including the unincorporated 22 urban area shown on attachment A•of this motion,within the Potential Annexation 23 Area of the City of Maple Valley. 24 i 25 2. This amendment is recommended to the Metropolitan King County Council and the j 26 Cities of King County for adoption and ratification- 27 28 ADOPTED by the Growth Management Planning Council of King County on September 29 17,2008 in open session,and signed by the chair of the GMPC. 30 ! F 31 32 33142-,l, ir, Management Planning Council 34 I I Attachment A N �.(�. LN Maple Valley V Potential Annexation Area King County The inf—lion;.Wad on this map has been compiled by IGng County staff from a variety al sources and is wbject IC change with -L Nng County makes no tepres Wions a ' warranties.e.vess or implied,as to a�—y,completeness. Urban Growth Boundary timeliness.or rights to the use of such Information. iON County v shall not be babe for any general,special,indrect,ioddental.or onsequenl al damages Inciudng, but not hrrited to, lost revenues or lost profits resulting from the use or maG=e of the Incorporated Areas infatuation contained on this map. My sale of this map a information on this map is prohibited except by mitten"m ssion of langC.unty Unincorporated Urban Area 0 500 1,000 2,000 Feet Included in Maple Valley PAA M�paWNCMapa\2(q(07]I hfY_PMmrd Il.Cf.OIABSP MOn70TGISM•mapsl)OOeO.hxwmbsp 20]801]i MV PMpH , r ;-NT Kt t1VLtY RU ytty=t ( i x w r •o � � - - -,: i ! `_•5E269TH•ST—o O N It t o COl /f t I F t �hM'wRIDGErNAYSE fW'�,�tit` »....._»._..._»�_..._.__..._.«. ..« V aF 1 r "IL w 'SE 27bTH ST - �7 x` �^ \'• ••' •-•: 1 ff)4 f11 t" [Y�,_ J�1•.r �t. f � y:.::•;•' 1 v7 •.� s,., � s. ,� � � ,r r:,r fair:'� r- � .a .�i _ , ^cn•'.•:y...: 4 .r >r. `�`�2s l�P• r�NL'4f'•--tir-^,1 _d, w,. � ,.� i.,.tn:.7:;{:..:�• :%try '�J .,,ram"`� f 4rH: �t� �?T:'•`, sF 2iarii`sr�°'t t sF:r� '�,. ��.- ' :•;,�:r•.z:.:s �_1�- t '�� � .�• '.�aa�,,,�ry c-�� / v.7:yTyl•;t��=•fti,.oi .�::::::••:;??l;�l�r" -�� `�l> �' SE 279TH ST• ,� I ���;,.jST:.:f�atr,�SE AS,4PLE�121�U,EpR�•i t:�::• �rn . . j '; � <� fit• SE 279TH PL �-�` ' SEi280TH,ST w SE^281 ST•ST w t f•:> vyi` II a . 5 —� IR e. a, ak. - i X � M . :sue . � I i 09/17/08 i B -Sponsoredy Executive Con unittee /pr 1 f MOTION NO. 08-6 A MOTION to amend the Urban Growth Area of King 3 County. This Motion also modifies the Potential Annexation i 4 Area map in the Countywide Planning Policies and 5 designates a new Urban Separator. 6 } . 7 8 WHEREAS,the Washington State Growth Management Act,RCW 36.70A.110 requires 9 counties to designate an urban growth area or areas within which urban growth shall be 10 encouraged and outside of which growth can occur only if it is not urban in nature;and 11 12 WHEREAS,Countywide Planning Policy FW-1 Step 8 recognizes that King County may 13 initiate amendments to the Urban Growth Area;and 14 15 WHEREAS,the King County.Executive and the Metropolitan King County Council 16 requests the Growth Management Planning Council consider the attached amendments to 17 the Urban Growth Area for eventual adoption by the Metropolitan King County Council 18 and ratification by the cities;and 19 20` WHEREAS,the Growth Management Planning Council has directed the interjurisdictional 21 staff team to review additional Urban Separators and present them for GMPC, 22 considetation,and 23 24 WHEREAS,Countywide Planning Policies LU-31 and LU-32 anticipate the collaborative 25 designation of Potential Annexation Areas and the eventual annexation of these areas by 26 cities. The attached amendments are supported by the affected city. 27 28 BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLANNING COUNCIL OF 29 KING COUNTY HEREBY MOVES AS FOLLOWS: 30 31 1. Amend the Urban Growth Area as designated by the Urban Growth Areas Map in the 32 Countywide Planning Policies,the Potential Annexation Area map,and the Urban 33 Separator map as depicted on the following attached maps: 34 35 36 i I i I Attachment 1,Carnation 2 Attachment 2,Sammamish North 3 Attachment 3,Bellevue Coal Creek I 4 Attachment 4,Enumclaw Fairgrounds 5 Attachment 5,Maple Valley Rock Creek 6 Attachment 6,Black Diamond Crow Marsh 7 Attachment 7,Maple Valley Dorre Don Reach 8 Attachment 8,Bear Creek Kathryn Taylor Park 9 Attachment 9,Maple Valley Technical Correction ` 10 Attachment 10,Black Diamond Technical Correction 11 Attachment 11,Lake Desire Urban Separator 12 , 13 Attachment 13,Eastridge Christian Assembly 14 15 Attachment 15,Duvall UGA -16 i 17 2. Amend the Interim.Potential Annexation Area Map by including any additional I 18 unincorporated urban land created by these UGA amendments in the Potential 19 Annexation Area of the adjoining city,and deleting any land changed from urban to. 20 rural from the respective PAA. 21 i 22 3. Amend the Urban Separator map by adding the new Urban Separator in the area known j 23 as Lake Desire as shown on attachment 11. j 24 I 25 4. These amendments are recommended to the Metropolitan King County.Council and the 26 Cities of King County for adoption and ratification. ' 27 28 29 30 ADOPTED by the Growth Management Planning Council of King County in open session I 31 on September 17,2008 and signed by the c air of the GMPC. 32 33 ti" 34 35 Ron Sims,Chair,Growth Management Planning Council 36 II 37 i 2 - • j i Attachment 1 N Carnation Rural City Urban Growth Area Studykv , Land Use Map King County ap.n,,.ma w..bwr+.a.ne i Emaaa..rtJ Seniaf TM Wo,n6on Intluded en W.m.P has been campbd by 'j WgGamyata"fro somces m.-deyef .M la wbpq b d,any° ag Agriculture rr� fa Incor orated Areas witlwut eW. Wag Courtly rmke. n nprsaanratlons or �._!1 P warrantba,eaprosa a h.as b.aunty,Wmpbbneac, tlneanaa, a .-t to &. Use of such in.y Walla ,,,V C..ty„'to rot tNended fa for an °away prodocL r r Rural Residential Urban Growth Boundary 10og Count' Mao rot m no la try mWral, vodatLWtW '7 W.d (ntldenbl,or Wn.I..Aeal damage.IncAk- but nct Or b,bat ro,enuea or lost Rdda N,. from U.ue1 or Meule d the in6..-on ten.p 4 p,. We map. t b sale d d4i map er WolmaEon on Wamap lsprotibitod eacopt by wriden rX Rural City UGA Area Added to UGA pa0ntnbn of IGr9 Coudy, 0 500 1,000 2.000 FEet 0S Open Space/Recreation Proposed Urban db:TwWay,Oapbnbar 7,700011:Ik16 AM ® ® Growth Boundary kt15HELt6YVA/PSU00609170ppp9p]C.ualb+RvnlCip'W/a,GMPC.nvd 5:101R aJFlCEI:tTGMpC1M0a GNRCWpHtMar GMPG MIp.Mabrbbl ' YALSOW LSO rL7e0eo97!_f:amalbnRwaCIryHGLGM{C.pol R9M ag I � �••• ..., orhsr � 21 / �•. i— LU i : € tq FT+t ,�, -i�s�f� :t _ �\ I J !-� fl'F' 1':,` 6q✓:3�' r i —i-�tr p�r s E 6AG1t'EEl' y r g� HEM .�W'N� z>E ti her 3. WSNY* T � Ir� � L�L�-r 'tLp €a.� - -P—Tr ,( ,-at t' may. SN it t r ---- i "•� ';,\ .yH�ST' `r'st�1�D1 5� r+ ?ai ,,/ � c ��F k`lyv�"F " � i e , �k'•..1..vJ��� �/r OS t r 3 t av1 I �� � y [i `? 3 yam` h` �`(''.'` •t,hYa t f t -� ty / Crx 'y0`a`�.RIz+ N N "j '�Lt �''� b•.•1� -s 1 dE h ti ` t ati`l42D^sy I(' ^t'� `c3 .._x ttyE•-rf?S1S .¢ zN��•. rx ._� z� I S}, kl���m� �� � / � � t� t}t �-' —�� �nc �,� . � ..w„�s•s�::M `J _ i NO vi'�t 11�#FY s t 1/ ���--'�" � _. .n_�4�„u_ s -' � �...� ' /,.r• .^.. �-•1• �`` i }� , �„�•l.,.•i•' � COI ON/ I I`g y f n rr ; a ri _ - IL 1 i Attachment 2 Sammamish Urban Growth Area Study - North Section > Land Use Map King County ' awom.Mwwr.bpm.nt.ro the W-4.,ird.ded an this map has been comps d by E+nimnrrn MN S+nies 1ith [o.k.e/roma C—1 of k., andiswbjeclm tlrarge MitltoN no0ce, lung County rraMea ro ropna0nb"orn of ", " ,"m.m ah.°°mp"""°"• �"��'� incorporated Areas rr Rural residential Gnenness a gnb to un use or wen Inb matbn. s TZ dowmont Is not Irdended br YSe as a$—*Y p tCvp C—ty sh.1 rat b r.bla for .ny pemrel, V-;.I, ndreq Inddenbl,or mnseq—W damas s ir.W.V.btd omat OS King County Owned Open Space/Recreation Grated b,bal roaenuea or loaf polo A�bam u" ,. Urban Growth Boundary r mhuse of the WomaCon c°nbirod On mla m.p.My sal°01 M m.p or Wonnaten on es map Is prcnibibd Oxoopl by wdbin pem,ise�,alw,C-1y UM Urban residential, Medium 4-12du/ac. 0 250 500 1,0m Area Added to UGA Feel ♦ ♦ Proposed Urban U Urban Residential,Low 1du/acre l�c�i e.i vv'u s"cooeosu°oewm s.mm°:mucn_adtn_curcrma ♦ ®♦ P 57gA OFFlCE4AaRGHPGIiOoItlAfCWSMmbrOMiCMt..Mabrobt Growth Boundary wisororr�lWa°907_SammarmhVWLrcM OMPC{d 03 NIlSON5f.1 E C 1 � i y : d Y rr { r Noy r ram"--h �}< �P ''1 ,o _ , �'�• , r 4dl rr 14 am amish ! H. z - -l- F a ;; .;•; ;:..`,',:: t ram sr~ rgr ;;ljtlTi um sy. 4 � —' l t,. 1_ a Et TI9 r. —L._L /• rr i N Attachment 3 Coal Creek Park1*44 LN Land Use Map King County aa'Iminaat,een,enb,a TT* Emfromnabl.aMora Kn e'.ty'en I— .t.1 map.1 been compiled by Wng Cernry slaty; e(sourwt>rld is eubpab Marge r-��•., �^�n"n, KiN C.^y —k03 Pe roP.—.0- of Incorporated Areas U m Urban Residential,Medium 4-12du/acre li eV...a WOW.as b ac j.wmpbeMss. ��.� 5meline ea, a dgh6 W the use of beh 10-6°O, i Thh d--.1 Is nel Wle d W use as a srq M&.L Wng County M.l rot be Nbb le, any 9.'W, speml. U I Urban Residential,Low 1du/acre indreck ir:odental,or mn.eQ .0 damage.k.Wkg,nut not Urban Growth Boundary finded b,1.0 raverxne or lost profile rewlong k°m the On. use of Ne kdombtlon°onbbnd en Nis map.MY.ale sl CIS Open Space/Recreation Nds f or W,.lrh on dis map is prauTV4 oaeepl by nto or o"" °'W y' LpdG �Gn ,,ep� ♦`®a® Proposed Urban Growth Boundary i F.at DaM:Tu Wag.apbrrku],te0e ia]]9 psl Q Area Added to UGA KlSHELLEYVAApSQJPlO.OMSG90}Ce.kleakPa:a„GuvG„ve 51GI1(_OFFIGnitn TGMFGVNe6MPGWpbrtbrGMPC Mb.Ilaterbbt ' uaeonam_3GOee9pt_CeolGa.tp,h GYFG.pef t4150N51a f / 1 ,.. SEi.0 S•T—•.. '., � Fes..-�:t ,� l r,/1 F i •1,.. •.'_ I t4`�`S—*f��/•.�5 •� 4� F I ,'t'i y �� J I _ ��I � .T:v i it /._ � � 1J � � -' -��•' .,� �t.; i - I � l5{ Q w� /F r r' S�:(jf +`` �sLa .., ✓• „p,, � �� - 1, � +'# }�I tt p'� _ Y• - t W-F � �r ,#� 1 „`t+.. �f �-•e _'r Y ra s' � �. �"^^ :.,? `•... y4� � r�i t r - - a 2 h 2�; u x s 7 � � i`�`--•''$ 9RC`PL � �.1- � `;�'b � •ik �' , j�.Ms ij :t ..,.•., o� �s ( .r,.titl ^_{ r 'uF Sti s'lS. F_3 I i :s`H{:�t'i{1"�:t::::':••:'r" S ,4. — {�Et .k ,•, I- Lam{ T � I Mj dui I is / c�G 1 •r' 5 - •:'�: t i rA 7 a• �X - - 6 7...t a G ,a i - 1 F: - - t x- tl �Ss��eik��t� � i t' r - .i� •:�',. yr.,• f,5 � �` - � \iitl�}Td3 :y� 5 �' r r r s t r 4Rac e. - ,.{l[•,�i}.{:_f b'.�k-1.c= � . .,..:. ,,. _"•L,v.. '',-_ t..::,..:....LS.,.,. s' T, y-��-at EN . -.y• _._Ly'.. .a ....:_+: ,: .. ...Ir.. ...�.�. ,.. :. :. ,,,.., ^.{. t„jai v.• �tv31 F. ill _ 5 'qsq H, .:C,: ;. •t�:: ttf:: .. F�� %: ayti. €: x z� a r a tit 1 tiur t'I r :. !rr� � I � t I s °"6 •s �,. Mt ■�-ew dS s � Ei \ 'F '� t t F¢¢= ��..r✓t 08 : �tr ti6 ,y f Enumclaw Fairgrounds Rural City Attac243111 N Urban Growth Area Study • King County Land Use Map O.pN.MatarhP ..� EmW nmaMai SaMna The fnf m W,ki d d on Ns trap has been i pibd by Mrg COWyslap lromavadery of mtxtsa ardbwb).dt—harge ("i' Rural Residential aviUrout n.fi— " County makes no ram—tati.- or bmnVea,expmas or Yrplbd,as b.aunty,conpkbneas, •:::.: rn"i a riphb is of such Infarmatiwt ••••� Area Added to UGA This do- nt fs not Ylerded for use as a away pnn cl PX Rural City UGA WN Cauny sh.l rot b. r bb nen for any pol, sp.eal. indraa fr6danbk or xonm"Maf da,nas bchMbp not but n 1��= : 6,H>a bat mvenuea a,lost(,ores epesuNn,fmm as pa incorporated Areas a misuse of em hionnstk,eanbkwd on Ns map,Any sai.of 0 S King County Owned Open Space/Recreation Us map a lnbrmadon on Ns map is pmNbbd except by wdmn . ® Proposed Urban 99sabn of iwp400 County. 0 800 ag Agriculture Growth Boundary Feet :To.w,y.s PMrto.r2moe I:n:.M f Forestry Urban Growth Boundary M:UHEIIEWAM9V0000ap00a Eour�cLrFilgmwAa CMPCmrd 8dD10.UFFICEWa M.MPCU=I WFV V3apbmtu CMM Mq.Mabdaht vrLenvn.3ooeosa2_Envrc>wfaYpmurm_GMtcpe KILSONSM J,�`lf-s• L�a t,r 3 i-5r] P .Y a- 2--.+• ?F f t i I -n 1 2b—^^--,--...0Grt•if t �: s t e 1 1 et { p y I, t.., 1 � _ 4 E- i }+rYr'ti 3 ky r E'F t t s ist t 5 L[t Lr e' t � •t•Qt i-• a ?... �.al igmrC+ �`� ,,�t�' 31'�,t yy- 'Y;,�} � 1,�� �.�a� �-tts3,{ r•F 't � I _ -i y. !.,.�Xr..:::' _��F �a� s j � L •4�5 � -13`-tis �>'X�4rf��3. £ - F - �'� F 5��tr3 4l r . CNUMCLkwCHIN00 FpS5•R "'ff p �„ r ll SE.47'9x( S. ¢ „ \ �t }t 4� i£ NNOA. s � 3y ter :. �r ty3 t 7r at 1 7.5 4 — :::•: Spc :m = e-'F •}':::.: ;` t a t if t 4 Hxr_. trts7-,ai= ,+ kL.Ri 9aiCTi4 3�F't—}��''`M. : is 6�' E< 1, 00 Ik �Ea - -- '- �•'d521VD!'xss::;.'.>:..�:..�:=; 1 it 2 ���F1 � �•ti rX :'.: K. -Jt .;::�: t }, `' F;,, i�1 �i �z , -�'F''� �'' �`-• L"N. ' SrtJgM � aiti _ aL l f r� (i31 •i tp t,�t�3 F 't{ EEO ag — C. ' 05 A. YirS tkr}'i ag ;p . rr L, a _ S�482tJD L Kt' Attachment 5 N 1st DNRP - Rock Creek Natural Area Land Use Map Kingcounty cegdmaM al Gawbprt.w and The EmlmvnMal Sa,Hns 1 "'°�"°°Endudedon this°°°b"bon b""b°tee Area Removed From UGA Coui slats homavade of sourcos and is eats dbsha v10 nok.. IGrg Cwny —a.a no roP.—W.- o wa V.s,op—et Wps d,as b aowmq,mvpbMnes; 0mo0noss, p rights to Itn of suh i"—f' ., Y"'d0p ht"^t'"ended ° ' F p"d"` incorporated Areas " CaWj shat �t bo lobb to any �t l _; p rr Rural Residential 1du/2.5 10acres Indroo(Mddenbl•or oonssq.hn sl damages i f adig,but nd fi.*d b,bsl rovemes or lod piles rosul0,g ft.U.use e(mb",d d°,e roam—Wn°oneivgd°n V"me,.My sere of OS Open Space/Recreation Ofdm,o Wo.ma°onendeamaplspmhNWde[caplbyWd°on Urban Growth Boundary ,.mimi,n of wng w"ny. 0 250 500 1,000 I Feet �� ♦ Proposed Urban t paY:Twsd.y,SePbnbn],200a l:@WPM Growth Boundary M:SSHEItEYMIMSQ00foeC00°aBl!naiGeatiGAVcme 81DIR_OFFIct1SeRG4Pcti0,e GhiPC W pbRAtGMPC Hy.Mslalhbl ",,;,200e0902_Re<sUaaa_GMec.pol KIlbOHSM rr �- % rr i r I 1 r F I os 5 9 r e t�s q c�❑�- Jk J� mgt-5.F � �' �lJk I ��LL n x �l� ��.Is5sPe t sSEA256THtSi�r. ,� URME sIV��a pNTe� 1/ ll 1 e 4 t 5 - ON ?7 __3 � ri-dFW. ?;, 't a..k I Vi t; 'F't'i. •\ Jig U. j. trt n , ra. o '•-.�-.fir �� �s�r N `n Fri F'.5 c I 3 s 1�9{ ' r t apt sY xta�t �t rr H ME 3ra } SE2S8TH$7 /' 3 Eli t- E� i flf it., r co r r �I. ,fit i.. A,,t�S— I �• / os 1 11, r rt j E UR I { � a i 05 -FiG i� Attachment 6 N 2nd DNRP - Crow Marsh Natural Area LN Land Use Map King County Dpadinnt etGmbPmn#W Eminemrsa s.rvtu. The Wonnaeon Uldoded on Ws map has been cwnrbd by Area Removed From UGA "Cowdy os' m fro 'wdety o I so—a nd Ie wbpd b charge .fthmA ne4ca 1Grg County rtakee m remsenb6om nemntfee.espnss sr YTpfed,as to a—racy,oorvld—s, incorporated Areas rX Rural Cities Urban Growth Area b6ness, ordghts to IM use of such inMmalbn. orae P i L___ This d—rt Is not Idendod Muse as a sweY prodwt County sbf,or not b cis!l. M ant s.�ra,, k Urban Growth Boundary OS Open Space/Recreation im e.4 b,lost—.,w9 of Pd a rewe"fiw V.ln. or misuse of the Ddonna-nonbi-d on Ws map.My sale of eds map of lMomu6en on Ws map is pmhiblad Wept by wdfmn f Opem,ilswn Mr-gro,y.250 500 �o� ®®®,♦ Proposed Urban Forestry Feet Growth Boundary rr Rural Residential 1du/2.5-10acres DrM:TwtdsY.SrPbnbrrl,300e 13k1�VM ' M:ISNEIIEWAM51300ao9¢tmt903_CmwNrnl�GMPOmd Change Area B:WIfl OFfICEIkW erGMPC2o00 dIPok4ephmbt GMPO Mp.Mrbrhbl wiwmm�l W609p1�GrovAAn ILGMPC.pol Y.I150H511 1 I erizweaha di+.-.r. f � l P \ e ,\ r \ f �ti 1 rx t 1 t rr i' i Attachment 7 i �1N 3rd DNRP - Dorre Don Reach Natural Area ka U Land Use Map KPngcounty awnmeMaoawn..n.+.m l Em7roma Msl SeMwa i The Hann,6on Included an this map has been e9,p,d by 1C+9 cawly still frdn avadayolwwoes and is wbpgm dmspe Area Removed From UGA mm" na opa. w a oew,ty —kea ^° r<Pes<ho— ar U m Urban Residential,Low 412du/acre Hes, ross inplbd,as m aownq,wnv4%.,. EmeEness, , aighb to lb use of oath inmrmaiion. r'. ;��i'1 Tees d—t is na end use l Intended b as a swey va,' . L yJ ;? Incorporated Areas 1C•+v county afros rot beI66b far any general. apeool, ` f 0 S Open Space/Recreation In 1,Inddenml,of wnsepuenlal damages incwing,but na Ar 1ed m,bd mwnws u fesi Peru..WV from Na use vso f the kgan an<n creamed on Ws map.My sale of Urban Growth Boundary pe j Industrial p. wny map or bdonnstion an Wf map Is pro}uTiled ea<ePl by wdtlan mducn a wny ta . 300 150 0 300 ♦ ♦ Proposed Urban Feet ♦ ®® Growth Boundary rr Rural Residential 1du/2.5-10acres ' Oa4:TwsdaY.Sa➢Isnbsa 2,]OOd ISs:a9 P1A RkDIFLOF WJIPSVeaD7a'300ee90t_Oorn wn GM➢G.mM ' b}pIR OFFICE.Sb TGMp41TWd Gaa}GiSepbnaw 04PC MID.Marubhl vdwrn�200t090t_Deneoen GHPG.y! NilsOHssl / um os rr s N 1 -...``- 1 r r p rrX. a��➢'7 i ' ''' EYED OW JFF y a. of Y , �c �t F I t t i 13 F-F3 rn a O K, Q$ R m 4 a � 1 � I f C � 4•.` t; sly F r� r._yy rr i . ,uC,� r } I • ':s �3XSl 7t�� t i�� SF __ a a 1 � 1 5��38TMST 7 a r T - Z rr yr 1 , f -„ FYt 1" 5 iPf 5�" t i z S N }itf SYs: -A IN g56-240.TH.RL f4-v ?n �2i ���1. tv Attachment 8 N 4th DNRP - Kathryn Taylor I.fq LN Land Use Kin Map-p g County EnMmmm�lJ SuNes Us bdanaWn Included on this map bas been compiled by "Cotntyada0 fromonrietyoIW—*$aWhWbkstbdnrge incorporated Areas wfihool rnCece. fGrg Crony nokaa no nproxnbcor,s °. p OS Open Space/Recreation Mks, zpnsa or to In.as b of —h mmpnstjo, This o- er s no to da use of suel. Ldorn,o& Tb'a cou7tynt la not INba lio for use a. W21.podxb 1nd `°bn" " ' "°' bbb s any '°n"a' °°eO 0 Urban Growth Boundary u pd Urban Planned Development Wald,.I'm a or ana,lost al damapoe be f.. bat not or nh b,bat nvenws or tort profile n a g horn Ue uee ul mleuse of f n aeon I n tI p 1,d on dds m>p.My sale of Vds maporinfemat ,An ads map fa pnHbYed except by writbn rr Rural Residential 1du/2.5-10acres pemdssbn°'"`^V�°°^�• Area Removed From UGA 0 250 500 1,000 wM:TwaaY.S.DbnLar],20a1]:01:26 RA Feet ♦® ♦ Proposed Urban WSNELLEYWAPS s'OOe09QOWo90l�.I ny�er_curc.rmd ® ♦ Growth Boundary Sil11A OFfiCE SYnG11PGVtOB GAIPGasa nt.r asu'C Nb.Malaibhl whenirn_10M0901_NalbrynhNer„Gl1PC.pdf WlbONSM - E-045TM•ST —.- OS gao �f'+ "�- N�44TH-ST I a rr HIM Ilk�. .• : 4zNoio.L rr �S NE144ST-PL—�.,� � •'' Oki LW ff � • 9 rr r _ -A OF 140TH-S ,ra / -E-tit uo . Z F'•13a7F1�T \ j J �•�,.,.� '• � j Fit�. f� ����" `� ' I Attachment 9 Maple Valley Technical Correction 1-431 Ila Land Use Map King County o.wnn.mel o.WDpm..a.m I. EmM°rurMM.l&Mee The hdormadon fndudad on Cda nap has boon tompibd by *V Coulry saart born a variety al wvu3 la suDjsd b charge ,AI-4 nad�. � C- _�aa n apm,anb*1 et r• ^'t-7 OS Open S ace/Recreation vamuaea,.gNeaa a�p�d,as b a�,aah I.Wtatonesq E.j_;yl Incorporated Areas P P tm°r.q or rights to the um.of - In10-6n, TNs dowment la not Intonlad for Ina as a away podzt tn,p r—hy anal net be Gable for any gene at, sgedal. U M Urban Residential,Medium 4-12du/acr 4i6raq incidental,or oene q—U dsmspa.including,but not ua.not Urban Growth Bounda b tad venues ry rined b, ro or lost ptNda n trq f orn or mhg of the inbmntbn oonb4bd on Ns msp.My ale of thlh map or Info doo on this map Is pMdbtad ncapf by writbn I Industrial o'.�anaf rA ty. wo 1,000 WZ Area Removed From UGA rr Rural Residential 1du/2.5-10acres Feet W W.TWadaKSepMttbw],]Coe]:IJ.W pM t;,unn-wric.UPSI]one09Q00&W C%Sl Ph YyTC_fJAPC.md slow oyyroE�sbmoupcvooew!pcwq.nbercupcuy.Mef.mbt a g Agriculture vaaetwtiaooeosv�u.day.IwrTc_cupcas W eONSM t os j !• rr 2 grysr 3€24 T.K&T.- / o rr E 2.2sGhi OS ! ag t r-•- j tl rr fd; rr i os q ,a Y e F . � OS u A 1 R JEN a +9n r rr rr CAR fl Jrir_I 1 ,S sn-rF f+sss_.s� K s 4 rr t rz a r t } j�f f A'f 4 `.d s� _. Sri '� ` '} } ] rN. { ! t .Fib t 7 Sjtt �' i 'i ,' 1 1. f 1I L T` '• _ ..r ER Itua r Pr .r,.s of 7j. y a � .�e l��6'F�f® f it 75 'k i..sty ' ? iT 2 �rj �Os%�k I f i 21 t } I t T -� ,I i Attachment 10 Black Diamond Technical Change Land Use Map LV King County D.p,rm.ti er o...hp...d.ro End,.emml.a..Nna Tito idormacon induded on dds map Ns been eomp'Iod by IVg comfy staff from a Yadery of so,_a nd is wbpd tx dung. ^•, Incorporated Areas WiNoul notice. IeY,g count' makes'no roprosenta4orrc w fmanes,..pro..or irPbed,.e ka.—racy,eorrybNne,s, L" `�• maw; w f9h. 1. ihs ,no .1 —h fnf.,mation. 1 i!•�I Mining It"d.eum.nt I.not mi.nd.d for use as a—y prodxt 1G,p C.unty shwa not beIobN Iw any general. Fpeik Urban Growth Bounda Ir,d,.ct k,dd.nW.or oonsery rov.nu. u.mial damages I.Wioq,W not ry f Forestry Imito t.•Jost s.,In.P.M.resulerq from d,e... m—.f a,.INnmobo,contxh d on Ws map.Any sals of pemnmaWnsof"r—tj.trionnat;on ondk.map is pmhlDAsd except by wnlbn ®•®`® Proposed Urban rr Rural Residential 1du/2.5-10acres 0 250 500 1,000 1.500 2,000 Growth Boundary Feet Area Added to UGA rX Rural Cities Urban Growth Area DSY:TwsdsY.B.pYrrba,1.30W]:]Qei R, MiSMELLEYVMPSROBe09Qn.d09d2�N.d DbnvM OMPom.. • Sign OFFIOE�BYTGMPOUOOB GNPCls.O,.rrL.r GMx My.M,\.rak\ .df Area Removed From UGA wtsa+sM t { i *t 4� 1221069015 NT 3 't r _ _ k 5 x 1321069059 7,10 TH fz 1321069002 t h 1321069056 F ✓ c t a' F 4E t '� i SIL T ✓. I { 1- Y i S{ T ', ••\•••\.• f f 1321069003 — .i SE+i�Cr,� S's I ry. kI + I ! '•::':::iL:i:•::if::-'•'` 1321069062 132 ' a a 1} PA y rX *... •i , J:. ... 1321069014 1321069013 � �4L'>=' - 3 + f .:�:+:•ems:: .:,' T. l — �- 3 1321069056 I I { i 3�t 1 \`.. 5 p� i, a i i Attachment 11 � N}� Lake Desire Subarea Plan V Land Use Map Kinscounty apa.on.maa..hnn.nl.ed �� ' EmMnm.nNlSwNq. MI The into—fion it k,&d on dd.,mp h..been—,,II d I, New Urban Separator Nkg Comry abnIrom.variety of souses andI sub)Wt d,arg. %*out nol- Ng County -.. n. ,ppesenbE.na o, g b Greenbelt/Urban Separator —.n4e%ekp,esa or 4*0.d.ea b aownry,mmpNbneaa, tk.yMaq or dghb to tho Ym of such Inb—5— The doame.t I.not:Handed ro,-n so.—y pn, ,L f Forestry leng County eh.% rot be Gahb for arc/ y.nefai, .pedal, . iM,sd,4Md.nbt,o,—.qu.ntiat dun.".Mch,ding•h,R not r r Rural residential forted to•Ind nvanu.a or lost p,.M...)d g from es use or miaum of tb.Inurrmbon o.nbin.d on uda map.MY sat.of p S Open space ",map or N h oao.bdomralon on a map pmNbad pt by wdden QO,miulon of tYnp , 0 1000 2,00 o Feel U M Urban residential,Medium 4-12du/ac. K.HEu..d.yAAPS2 W lOoa _U%od Urban residential,Low 1du/ac. S0JR-OFFIC%S 1M d0At00EWC1-Ia Pbv,.SUW..Fbn GNPCIAO U 5101�OFFlCE55nQgNP052W0 pIfCW p.mtwr dYFd Np,N.l.d.ht viwn,nl,t00009 W-4t.W ak.Seh.naP.r._CY{CpY 'MLSONSN 1 rr ` ! f rr is tfi�& �' •"'• Os os I FDS• 1`.�' rr qmdft os rr rr z 5.f�. N ;S ti, ti f l f um : y A'KE�7ESlr(E rr o z N rr _z i I Attachment 13 N Eastridge Christian Assembly Land Use Map KingCourrty papamnM el Oaa,bpmal aM Em4er✓.aNd SsMa, The Irdomneon indudad on Ws map h„bean comp'kd by K+g Co-*rofllrom a rint°fa Ia. erdu wbjeat b+diuga f';"t•-' Incorporated Areas »dou neo°e. �aeny —,a, a ropesenaeo^, o, UI Urban Residential Low 1du/acre �•,};::,;, nanEea,e,pnaa«krpr.d,o,to amy,mnpkemaae, L:> t TN'd « ants '° `" �e el nh Into ma an U tp Urban Residential,Medium 4-12du/acre iNz doamml Is not blended ler me as wey product. �°' `°°" thao °° -bk `«asap°^°'' °°°°` Urban Growth Boundary indract, an.,of°°naeQbe^tlal de W)WkV.but not r r Rural Residential Wad b,1.9 rovenbea or lost p,.%rosuldrq hmn U.use di;use.1 the W.—tbn."lood an V,map.Any axle of map N°man1.MNWade eptbyw"aa^ os Kin County Owned ♦ ♦ Proposed Urban w,�sk^ett��aN,t,. g ry ♦ p e 601� zoo W0 400 600 Open Space/Recreation ® ® Growth Boundary Peel Area Added to UGA Data:T.-Y..,a—i.ICUL,:Op06 PN d g M:l9NELLEVYJAPSG0p609YtpeaeBQ_Fasbidpa_6NPC , SNIP OFFICE�Sb,Y.sIFClfpp3 GMPLW a[amhr GMPL My,M>Isibhl bifalem_1WMaZLEnhkpa_GNPC.pol YAISONSN --- r ter' rn G�S`�O• o P� N yyPaJ 5� w a —w .. 21 <�a! r;S m ly N ! t - 'F DiliN. •.1 t: :1•i r1 I t: aF¢F- { i f d -Ui 7 t a7 r� � � 3 � '•"� Y - L ' �4 zE L{ I ��—•�Sc'S6TN-�•T O S �5e i i N Attachment 17 Duvall UGA 1.411 Land Use Map LN Kingcounty wpuvnru et w5rbweln aoa � EmieumKllWMat i The bdomi .bdud"on thb map h.,been.-0;,d by Ihp CoMdy stall fmm.variety of rowoea end is aubiea b d.m. 5,i%t ftoko. wry Cm* make, n. mgoaenbdons or OS Open Space/Recreation "'°an"'° ""° 1. ff.W. .. of --h' Area Added to Duvall Rural City UGA tifMlbletY, a dghb n tM of tuch (Noy pn,n 7Nf doament is rot INerdad Iv use ss a awey poduct W" minty s,,.e b, tab" far any pe�ral, aperial, rX Rural Cities Urban Growth Area tn�ft.a,bddenbl,or mnsequendY damages l.WhV.bN not 66ted b,lost..nws or lost Rost.m r$V fNm U.uae of W Incorporated Areas .,p of d, (nbmadon ne on map.My W.a a g Agriculture rids map omudon. mbid dia on rids map Is pmbbibd es«pt by wdtmn pemdabn of Wn9 Cowty. o zso eoo 1.000 Urban Growth BoundaryNTM Feet rr Rural Residential 1du/2.5-10acres tA5IR-0 EYMIP5V00009¢006WV!_lTmtVO/LG61vCmd ® ` Proposed Urban Growth Boundary 61DIR OFFl-9W_OM'U'] dGMPCWphmGrOMPC Nq.iMledabl W2wMm_20080e0!_11vn1UGyLGMPCpli 5M15gV5M 1122 r!L bid I j i�ra FOR { N.. 1 , I 1 if a r I ! f t. _\ t A— T r' d..r rFy t t '1!-' t �aZ w adst t�,� E # rr a4 tiIN- Nit t'3 'l k5 � y ` � # 5 ibl2tba f r -� ,t' l t�xs is�� �� � �•� 4�n �S- �3�r�y�d - *�7 j.�.is+d� �����1 ag }� '` flk } �, 7 3 rf 3 ns i5- tt ah - 'N�f w { �..�. ' _ _ _ a''... s• J-G�a -y� E f 1�,�1'•2 `M1i y r''� .f15 'rti,��,,,4,y�'x �. ag �•t S-. �5��t-�JJ?yyC3L " y� �.-t _ C?t< t `��*'y�''._;t:- ___ 'BIB R•TR'd,Y'D.___.. � .1'�•� fit.'• •:f.'•' .—..._...---..—...—..._., -. _yj'' '•' -�1—��a.a=-'fir i•• OS rr � - ,i 1 ag r i f a King County, Metropolitan King County Council Growth (Management and Natural Resources Committee Agenda Item 6, 7 & 8 Date: December 15, 2008 No.. 2008-0620 2008-0621 Kendall Moore Proposed Ord.: 2008-0622 Prepared by: Rick Bautista Invited: Paul Reitenbach, DDES REVISED STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: Substitute Proposed Ordinance 2008-0620 which would ratify the recommendations made by at the September 17, 2008 meeting of Growth Management Planning Council and forwarded : to the County Council for action regarding redesignation of land use for 13 properties that the Council already approved as part of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan Updates. A technical amendment was offered. Substitute Proposed Ordinance 2008-0621 which would ratify the recommendations made by at the October 2, 2008 meeting of Growth Management Planning Council and forwarded to the County Council for action regarding redesignation of land use for the Summit Pit property that the Council already approved as part` of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan Updates. A technical amendment was offered. Substitute Proposed Ordinance 2008-0622 which would ratify on behalf of the citizens of unincorporated King County the redesignation of rual to urban property referred to as the Reserve at that the Council already,approved as part of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan Updates. A technical amendment was offered. COMMITTEE ACTION: On December 8, 2008, the the Growth Management & Natural Resources Committee approved Ordinances 2008-0620 through 2008-0622 as amended, with a do pass recommendation, subject to signatures, and placed them on the consent calendar. SUBJECT Three ordinances, the passage of which would approve of changes to the Urban .Growth Boundary and interim' potential annexation areas ("PAAs") already adopted in the 2008 updates to the King County King Comprehensive Plan. For the purposes of the County-wide*Planning Policies .("CPPs"), adoption of these three ordinances would also serve as ratification on behalf of the population unincorporated King County for these changes and initiate the, process of ratification by the cities. SYNOPSIS OF ISSUES Pursuant to CPP FWA step 9, the Growth Management Planning Council ("GMPC") made recommendations contained in GMPC Motions 08-5, 08-6 and ) 08-7. Proposed Ordinance 2008-0620 would approve the recommendations contained in GMPC Motions 08-5 and 08-6. Proposed ,Ordinance 2008-0621 would approve_the recommendation contained in GMPC Motion 08-7.' Those j motions recommend the following: 1. . GMPC Motion 08-5, recommending 'the amendment of the interim potential annexation areas map to include a portion of unincorporated urban area formally, referred to as the Polygon-4 to 1, to Maple Valley's PAA; 2. GMPC Motion 08-6, recommending land redesignation and amendment of the interim potential annexation.areas maps to include fifteen of the executive's proposed map amendments submitted by the Executive as part of his proposed 2008 updates to the County's Comprehensive Plan; and i 3.• GMPC Motion 08-7, recommending land redesignation the amendment of the interim potential annexation areas map to include the County's Summit Pit property as part of Maple Valley's PAA: Also before the Council is Proposed Ordinance 2008-0622, which would approve UGB and PAA changes regarding Reserve at Covington Creek. This map amendment to the CPPs was not initiated at the GMPC but rather by action taken as part of the 2008 King County Comprehensive Plan Update. Passage of these ordiances will intiate the ratification process to ensure consistency between the King County Comprehensive Plan and the CPPs. BACKGROUND.:, The GMPC is a formal body comprised of elected officials from King County, Seattle, Bellevue, the Suburban Cities, and-Special Districts. The GMPC was created in 1992 by interlocal agreement, in response to a provision in the Washington State Growth Management Act ("GMA") requiring cities and counties to work together to adopt CPPs. Under GMA, CPPs serve as the framework for each individual jurisdiction's comprehensive plan, and ensure countywide consistency with respect to land use planning efforts. As provided for in the interlocal agreement, the GMPC developed and i i recommended the Countywide Planning Policies; which were adopted by'the King .County Council and ratified by the cities. Subsequent amendments to the CPPs may either be initiated by GMPC recommendations via motions or by King County Council action, followed by King County Council ratification, and, finally ratification by the cities. Amendments to the CPPs become effective when ratified by ordinance or resolution by at least 30% of the city and county governments representing at least 70% of the population of King County. A city shall be deemed to have ratified-an amendment to the CPPs unless, . within 90 days of adoption by King County, the city by legislative action disapproves it. SUMMARY: Proposed Ordinances 2008-0620, 2008-0621 and 2008-0622 would amend the CPPs by making adjustments to the Urban Growth Area, Potential Annexation Area, and Urban Separator maps. As part of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update, the King County Council made several changes to the urban growth area boundary. Because the GMA requires the County's Comprehensive Plan to be consistent with the CPPs, these amendments necessitate changes to the Urban Growth Area map in the countywide planning document. The County's redesignation of lands from rural to urban also. requires changes.to the Potential Annexation Area maps, since urban areas are to eventually be annexed by cities. In one instance, an amendment would require a-ohange to the Urban Separator map (Lake Desire). Because the Council had already made the policy decision(s) to amend the Urban Growth Area in the 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update, a detailed discussion of the individual map amendments is not included in this staff report. A brief description of each of the proposed changes is included below. Additionally, at Attachment 3 are the GCMP staff reports that contain more detailed descriptions of each of these changes. Attachment 4 is the map amendments adopted as part.of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan Updates in support of the change to the Urban Growth Boundary for the Reserve,at Covington Creek. Adoption of the Proposed Ordinances would conform the CPPs to the 2008 Comprehensive Plan as follows: A. Proposed Ordinance 2008-0620/GMPC Motion 08-5 -Amendments to the countywide Potential Annexation Areas map 1. Polygon 4-1 — Include this already urban area into Maple Valley's PAA. B. Proposed Ordinance 2008-0620/GMPC Motion 08-6 -Amendments to the countywide Urban Growth Area Boundary map and/or, where noted, amendments to the countywide Potential Annexation Areas'map or to the countywide Urban Separator map 1. Carnation —.redesignate 12'acres,from rural to urban and'inciude in Carnation's PAA. 2. Sammamish: Mystic.Lake and Camden Park redesignate approximately 45 acres of the single property referred to as Mystic.Lake and include in Sammamish's PAA. Redesignate the rural portion of the existing Camden Park neighborhood to urban and . include these;arid.the'rest of the neighborhood in Sammamish's PAA. 3. Bellevue Coal Creek Park- redesignate the Park from rural to urban and include it in Bellevue's.PAA. 4. Enumclaw.Fairgrounds and Sportsman Park— redesignate the Fairgrounds and Park from rural to urban and include in Enumclaw's PAA: 5. Maple Valley Rock Creek Technical Correction —correct the designate of 22 properties that are within the-Rural Area but which the Land Use map incorrectly designates as urban. 6. Black Diamond Crow Marsh Technical Correction — redesignate County-owned ,parcels from urban to rural and remove from Black Diamond's PAA. . 7. Maple Valley Dorre Don Reach Technical Correction -redesignate.County-owned parcels from urban to rural and remove.from Maple Valley's PAA: 8. Bear Creek Kathryn Taylor Park Technical Correction redesignate County-owned parcels from urban to rural. 9. Maple Valley Technical Correction — remove an urban land use designation from property outside the UGA. .This corrects a mapping error. 10. Black Diamond Technical Correction - refine the East Annexation Area of Black Diamond to reflect the exact, rather than estimated border, of that area and include it in Black Diamond's PAA i 11. Lake Desire Urban Separator—designate an 85 acre Urban Separator on the north and east side of Lake.Desire, located in Renton's PAA. '12.Snogualmie Interchange (also referred to as the Snoqualmie Hospital project) - NOT ADOPTED AS PART OF THE KING*COUNTY 2008 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATES 13. Issaquah Eastridge Christian Assembly— redesignate 3 parcels and part of another from rural to urban and include in Issaquah's PAA. i I i 14. Sammamish Duthie Notch — NOT ADOPTED AS PART OF THE KING COUNTY 2008 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATES 15. Duvall/Burhen — redesignate approximately 40 acres from rural to urban and include in Duvall's PAA. NOTE: Although the GMPC recommended the redesignation of property from rural to. urban for both the Snoqualmie Interchange and Duthie Hill, bordering Sammamish, and inclusion of those properties in the respective PAAs, the Council rejected these - . proposals during the Comprehensive Plan Update. Therefore; these recommendations are not included in the proposed ordinance for ratification. C. Proposed Ordinance 2008-0621/GMPC-Motion 084 -Amendments to the countywide Urban Growth Area Boundary map and to the countywide Potential Annexation Areas map: 1. Maple Valley Summit Pit— redesignate 156 acres from rural to urban and include in Maple Valley's PAA. NOTE: The GMPC voted to recommend the land use redesignation and PAA designation on October 2, 2008. The passage of this recommendation occurred after Maple Valley had withdrawn its objections and had executed a memorandum of agreement with the.Executive, which promising joint planning-for the future development of this parcel. D. Proposed Ordinance 2008-0622 Amendments to the countywide Urban Growth Area Boundary map and to the countywide Potential Annexation Areas map: 1. Reserve at Covington Creek (Black Diamond)- redesignate approximately 51 acres from rural to urban and includes the area in Black Diamond's PAA. NOTE: At the September 17, 2008 meeting, the GMPC voted not to recommend this map amendment because of Black Diamond's expressed indifference. However, prior to taking final action of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan Updates, the City of Black Diamond submitted written assent to the redesignation and the adding of the property into its PAA. STAFF ANALYSIS: The actions contemplated by these ordinances are consistent with the land use map amendments adopted in the 2008 updates to the King County Comprehensive Plan. AMENDMENTS: There are technical corrections to each of the proposed ordinances as outlined below: I A. Amendment 1 to Proposed Ordinance`2008-0620:. i 1. ; Removes paragraphs A and B from the'findings. These findings are not necessary. They add nothing,in way of explanation to this legislation and refer to old actions unrelated to this legislation. In the last ordinance adopted by the Council that j g ratified changes to the CP.Ps,'these paragraphs,were removed. 2. Attaches the relevant GMPC mot ions(08-5 and 0876) and their attached map j amendments; and correctly references them so as to correspond to the ordinance language. IB. Amendment Ito Proposed Ordinance 2008=0621 1. Removes paragraphs A and B from the findings. 2. Adds the Maple Valley maps to the Attachment A (GMPC motion 08-7). C. Amendment 1 to Proposed Ordinance 2008-0622 1. Removes paragraphs A and B from the findings. 2. Deletes incorrect reference at paragraph W on page 4, line 67. The corrected language would be a single sentence which would read: Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning-Policies are amended as shown by Attachment A of this ordinance. F 3. At page 8, line 148, that sentence is rewritten to provide clear direction that the*area redesignated from rural to urban shall be included in Black Diamond's PAA. i i i' ti i KING COUNTY 1200 King County Courthouse 516 Third Avenue Seattle,WA 98104 King County Signature Report December 15, 2008 Ordinance 16335 Proposed No. 2008-0621.2 Sponsors Gossett I AN ORDINANCE adopting amendments to the 2 Countywide Planning Policies; amending the interim 3 potential annexation areas map and ratifying the amended 4 Countywide Planning Policies for unincorporated King 5 County; and amending Ordinance 10450, Section 3, as 6 amended, and K.C.C.20.10.030 and Ordinance 10450, 7 Section 4, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.040. 8 9 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY: 10 SECTION 1. Findings: The council makes the following findings: 11 The Growth Management Planning Council met on October 2, 2008, and voted to 12 recommend amendments to the King County Countywide Planning Policies, amending 13 the interim potential annexation areas map as shown in Attachment A to this ordinance to 14 include a portion of unincorporated urban area within the Potential Annexation Area of 15 the city of Maple Valley. 16 SECTION 2. Ordinance 10450, Section 3, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.030 are " 17 each hereby amended to read as follows: 1 ' Ordinance 16335 18 A. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide Planning 19 Policies attached to Ordinance 11446 are hereby approved and adopted, j i 20 B. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning i 21 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12027. 22 C. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning I 23 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12421. 24 D. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 20-12 -.Countywide Planning 25 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments•1 and 2 to Ordinance 13260. 26 E. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 27 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments I through 4 to Ordinance 13415. 28 F. The Phase H Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning 29 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 13 85 8. 30 G. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012—Countywide Planning 31 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14390. f 32 H. The Phase 11 Amendments,to the King County 2012-Countywide Pla using 4_ 33 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14391. 34 I. The Phase IL Amendments to the King County 2012—Countywide Planning 35 Policies are amended,as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14392. 36 J. The Phase 11 Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning i 37 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14652. I 38 K. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012- Countywide Planning i 39 Policies are amended, as shown by.Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 14653. 1 i 2 I i Ordinance 16335 40 L. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 41 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14654. 42 M. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 43 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14655. 44 N. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 45 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments 1 and 2 to Ordinance 14656. 46 O. The Phase II amendments to the King County 2012—Countywide Planning 47 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment A to Ordinance 14844. 48 P. The Phase 1I Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 49 Policies are amended as shown by Attachments A,B and C to Ordinance 15121. 50 Q. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 51 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment A to Ordinance 15122. 52 R. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 53 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment A to Ordinance 15123. 54 S. Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 55 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments A and B to Ordinance 15426. 56 T. Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 57 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments A, B and C to Ordinance 15709. 58 U. Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 = Countywide Planning 59 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment A to Ordinance 16056. 60 V. Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 61 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments A, B, C, D, E and F to Ordinance 16151. 3 Ordinance 16335 62 W. Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 63 Policies are amended as shown by Attachment A to this ordinance 64 SECTION 3. Ordinance 10450, Section 4, as amended,,,and K.C.C.20.10,040 are 65 each hereby amended to read as follows: 66 A. Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 10450 forahe purposes 67 -specified are hereby ratified on behalf of.the population of unincorporated King County. 68 B. The amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 69 10840 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. 70 C. The amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 71 11061 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated Kin County. ?lp g Y 72 D. The Phase II amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide Planning 73 Policies adopted by Ordinance 11446 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of 74 unincorporated King County. 75 E. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies,as 76 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12027.are hereby ratified on behalf of the I 77 population of unincorporated King County. I 78 F. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as i 79 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12421, are hereby ratified on behalf of the I 80 population of unincorporated King County. 81 G. The amendments to the King County 2012. - Countywide Planning Policies, as 82 shown by Attachments 1 and 2 to Ordinance 13260, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 83 population of unincorporated King County. i 4 Ordinance 16335 84 H. The amendments to the King County 2012 _ Countywide Planning Policies, as 85 shown by Attachment 1 through 4 to Ordinance 13415, are hereby ratified on behalf of 86 the population of unincorporated King County. 87 I. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 88 shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 13858, are hereby ratified'on'behalf of 89 the population of unincorporated King County. 90 J. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 91 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14390, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 92 population of unincorporated King County. 93 K. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 94 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14391, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 95 population of unincorporated King County. 96 L. The amendments to the King County 2012- Countywide Planning Policies, as 97 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14392, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 98 population of unincorporated King County. 99 M. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 100 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14652, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 101 population of unincorporated King County. 102 N. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 103 shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 14653, are hereby ratified on behalf of 104 the population of unincorporated King County. 5 Ordinance 16335 i i 105 O. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning.Policies, as 106 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14654, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 107 population of unincorporated King County. I 108 P..The,amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide Planning Policies, as Ordinance 14655 are hereby ratified on behalf of the �- 109 shown by Attachment 1 to Ord. , � 110 population of unincorporated King County. 111 Q. The amendments to, the,King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies, as 112 shown by Attachments 1 and 2 to Ordinance 14656, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 113 population of unincorporated King County. 114 R. The amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide Planning Policies, as 115 shown by Attachment A to Ordinance 14844, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 116 population of unincorporated King County. f 117 S. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 118 shown by Attachments A, B and C to Ordinance 15121, are hereby ratified on behalf of 119 the population of unincorporated King County. 120 T. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 121 shown by Attachment A to Ordinance 15122, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 122 population of unincorporated King County. 123 U. The amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning Policies, as 124 shown by Attachment A to Ordinance 15123, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 125 population of unincorporated King County. 6 i Ordinance 16335 126 V. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 127 shown by Attachments A and B to Ordinance 15426, are hereby'ratified on behalf of the 128 population of unincorporated King County. 129 W. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, 130 as shown by Attachments A, B and C to Ordinance 15709, are hereby.ratified on behalf 131 of the population of unincorporated King County. 132 X. The amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning Policies, as 133 shown by Attachment A to Ordinance 16056, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 134 population of unincorporated King County. 135 Y. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 136 shown by Attachments A,B, C, D, E and F to Ordinance 16151, are hereby ratified on 137 behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. 138 Z. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies as 139 7 i Ordinance 16335 140 shown by Attachment A to this ordinance are hereby ratified on behalf of the population I 141 of unincorporated King Count 142 i Ordinance,16335 was introduced on 12/8/2008 and passed by the Metropolitan King. County Council'on 12/15/210082 by the following vote: • i Yes: 7=Ms. Patterson,'Mr. Constantine,Ms. Lambert,Mr. von Reichbauer, Mr. Ferguson, Mr. Gossett and Mr. Phillips No: 0 Excused: 2.-Mr. Dunn and Ms. Hague E ' KING COUNTY COUNCIL KING COUNTY,'WASHINGTON .. C D N ,s Jul' Patterson,Chair r_7 ATTEST: , r71 I L Anne Noris,Clerk of the Council Cl) CD p 1 I APPROVED this day of ,2008. (Ela Ron Sims,County Executive I Attachments A. Motion 08-7,revised 12/09/08 8 i Lh YAo4 �1 10/02/08 &VIsec) Sponsored By: Executive Committee /pr 1 MOTION NO. 08-7 i 2 A MOTION to amend the Urban Growth Area of King 3 County. This Motion also modifies fhe Potential Annexation i 4 Area map in the Countywide Planning Policies and 5 designates a new Urban Separator. 6 7 8 WHEREAS,the Washington State Growth Management Act,RCW 36.70A.I 10 requires 9 counties to designate an urban growth area or areas within which urban growth shall be 10 encouraged and outside of which growth can occur only if it is not urban in nature;and 11 12 WHEREAS,Countywide Planning Policy FW-1 Step 8 recognizes that King County may 13 initiate amendments to the Urban Growth Area; and ; 14 15 WHEREAS,the King County Executive and the Metropolitan King County Council I 16 requests the Growth Management Planning Council consider the attached amendments to j 17 the Urban Growth Area for eventual adoption by the Metropolitan King County Council 18 and ratification by the cities; and 19 i 20 WHEREAS,the Growth Management Planning Council has directed the intedurisdictional 21 staff team to review additional Urban Separators and present them for GMPC 22 consideration, and 23 24 WHEREAS,Countywide Planning Policies LU-31 and LU-32'anticipate the collaborative 25 designation of Potential Annexation Areas and the eventual annexation of these areas by 26 cities. The attached amendments are supported by the affected city. 27 28 BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLANNING COUNCIL OF 29 KING COUNTY HEREBY MOVES AS FOLLOWS: 30 31 1. Amend the Urban Growth Area as designated by the Urban Growth Areas Map in the 32 Countywide Planning Policies,the Potential Annexation Area map,and the Urban 33 Separator map as depicted on the following attached maps: 34 35 36 i :I 1 Attachment 1,Maple Valley Summit Pit 2 .I 3 2. Amend the Interim Potential Annexation Area Map by including any additional 4 unincorporated urban land created by these UGA amendments in the Potential 5 Annexation Area of the adjoining city,and deleting any land changed from urban to 6 rural from the respective PAA. 7 8 3.. These amendments are recommended to the Metropolitan King County Council and the 9 Cities of King County for adoption and ratification. 10 11 ' � 12 13 ADOPTED by the Growth Management Planning Council of King County in open session 14 on October 2,2008 and signed by the chair of the GMPC. 15 17 18. n ' , rowth Management Planning Council 19 20 I � i • jI I I : i 2 - Attachment 15 N Maple Valley - Summit Pit LN Land Use Ma King County p 0.'paMvrYo De ebpmeM and Em6aormeal.1 Se,kes The Information included on this map has been comgled by Kmg C-ayslaHhoma raiatyolsohr—rdl is subject to change r 1 without not,,, King County makes no representations or L__r� Incorporated Areas rr Rural Residential 1du/2.5-10acres warranties, express or analwd,as to accMracy,completeness, bmelmess, or rights to the use of such information. This document is not intended for use as a survey product Wing Co un y shM not be liable for a" general, special, indirect'vKideale.or consequentel damages including,but not Urban Growth Boundary' ry U pd Urban Planned Development trailed to,lost revenues or lost profits resulting from the use or misuse of the information coami"ad on this map.Any safe of this map or information on this map is prohibited except by waften permission of King County Area Added to UGA 0 250 500 1,000 Feet Date:T—day.SapW,rb.2,2008 3:57:28 PM WSHELLE•MAPS�000G MapleV,%SwmhlPu GMPCm.d 5:'Dlfl OFFIGE�SbIfGMPC12W8 GMPClSepxrMer GMM Mfg.M.ami%\ m M-m_20080g02_Mapt m eWacySamlPit PC_GM .pd I 4MLSONSM r r ,J} SE 6:TH: L a�2G5ThiST ^ ( T <�k3' SE t 6Tti-S'I• -SE-2136 T•H SHI f o4687'H•PI_ z Ex7Htt a d �. 1 S.l _ .(• f t/ •3 -.t o. - t sr t! I 1 z J rf'. 51�SE z - 74T 1' • K>. ram_ } _ t q ' 1 L i ,,/ - 'w E2'IG1.H�ST _ r :r - - 1 ,a - a - -w Y ' f S - P S ,1L .N fij F 4 1 F= I t - N 9T l F 3 �y 1- _ J t; f- n - 'v N - � A. : � S�2f1DTN S,T •� r.. � � '. ' S�E7�2-G�TH�-PyL+ �,SE 7aU'FH•ItL •• � ,. � µwj ,:. '. 1/��� �-�{--�-{-}-}-{ - � E 1GCTFi PL w ! a a 0i '�"`�.5 l_LJ_CJ._sh EJ�S r.5'•1.°•l' � _ !—� � � .� . Q - `� � ¢ � >..' r� > "r 2S1Sr E_- h`"'-•-_ 288 RD.ST' l� E 1S3RU+S'f !'- fit --'"'-�Y .S�7pdRD S�r'" � •- sE234Ttlst Kent ^ >� �S NTH ST hSF 8:i1 H-ST � f t t m Maple Valley - Summit Pit a Proposed Zoning Map Kin"CountL Deparbneri of Develop— E,ninmm.r/al Services The Information included on this map has been compiled by King County staff from a variety of sources and is subject to change s 1 Without notice. King County makes no representations or Incorporated Areas RA-5 Rural Area, one DU per 5 acres warranties,express or implied,as to accuracy,completeness, if=iness, or rights to the use of such information. This document is not intended for use as a survey product U R Urban Reserve King County shall not be liable for any general, special. 3 Urban Growth Boundary Indirect,in dental.or consequential damages including,but not <i ' bmted to.lost revenues or lost profits,esulling from the use or r isuse of the iaformallon contained on this map.My sale of S O Special District Overlay for an this map or information on this map Is prohibited except by wntten p Y permission of King County Change Area Urban Planned Development 0 250 500 1,000 Feel Dare:Tuesday,September 30,2000 104 14 PM MI SHELLEY%MWSX200 d 9QOCDM30 MapNVaipy$v mitRt,prop_zoNrg mxd MIM4PS120DB09,M0900_MapleValley$u—ilPA_p.p_z.g,pol KILSONSM \`• A-2fi5TH'P�L �/dt�� LIF _ ... S.E 2ffiT :T tu _ SFr:2 T-tI,S<'.� w--� t 1(1 f-- Imo �fi7Ty a( = �� LL ' Ir S(Ef2r1�7TT�,�+FST_ fro i-�.�IJ� � .L�� �- -- j o� �a - - _a�,�i_ I ry N I I f�Lid- , N- D,f �s a.� fFis J � � ,l'263T"ST w` T `�f— �,�1 m� -- I uir - �`� — �-� SE: G 7jH_P t L 1 ... r n E fi3TH u F 1 --emu ail:_' I. o i l I w t � Ti (� t- 127)TH PL �\\y�t1f i;,a M o f I Si 1 J.0) f— N :1� INTtI �_ - � y I �S Ii 7i1ST"S� � Maple Valley i 27-1;S SE Z77ND ST .':. - _ 1—r �1` a�; �1�1 i i I ►- � , � 1t � i � -rr r SC274TH Sr �I /�, N- ,W UR-SO -- / �1 v J `a ~ t 7 S79 I ! 1�1`�.1 J ! [ Sv a TL u SE� ft Tlip SE 2 OTN'PL!' I ` > �r� r t�_1t.�_! JT I , r � � I � � - 183 �ua � i�l_ �Y - �[- Lu u Nr ---- �� .--,. -?-` uto •� S-1.J�>. y Tw ti 1 �y 5 ,2 G. k v n f�� SE p ~ p 1� t J Sv„ m �� 1 17 SE 2f+rRDST !((���SE 3RD ST - I ITT. I f - ! SE i3RSP ( 28p{RD Sl�I r '~f l +Cj i�+3 -r•� 7�r lr� � y:`-. t � �i�r-i:� t [ SE 180Tlo S 7 I a King'County Metropolitan King County' Council Growth Management and Natural Resources Committee Agenda Item 6, 7 & 8 Date: December 15, 2008 2008-0620 Proposed Ord.: 2008-0621 Prepared by: Kendall Moore 2008-0622 Rick Bautista Invited: Paul Reitenbach, DDES REVISED - STAFF REPORT SUBJECT. Substitute Proposed Ordinance 2008-0620 which would ratify the recommendations made by at the September 17, 2008 meeting of Growth Management Planning Council and forwarded to the County Council 'for action regarding redesignation of land use for 13 properties that the Council already approved as part of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan Updates. A technical amendment was offered. Substitute Proposed Ordinance 2008-0621 which would ratify the recommendations made by at the October 2, 2008 meeting of Growth Management Planning Council and forwarded to the County Council for action regarding redesignation of land use for the Summit Pit property that the Council already approved as part of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan Updates. A technical amendment was offered. Substitute Proposed Ordinance 2008-0622 which would ratify on behalf of the citizens of unincorporated King County the redesignation of rual to urban property referred to as the Reserve at that the Council already approved as part of the 2008.Comprehensive Plan Updates. A technical amendment was offered. COMMITTEE ACTION: On December 8, 2008, the the Growth Management& Natural, Resources Committee approved Ordinances 2008-0620 through 2008-0622 as amended, with a do pass recommendation, subject to signatures, and placed them on the consent calendar. SUBJECT Three ordinances, the passage of*,which would approve of changes to the Urban Growth Boundary and interim *potential annexation areas .("PAAs") already adopted in the 2008 updates to the King County King Comprehensive Plan. For the. purposes of the County-Wide'Planning Policies ("CPPs"), adoption of these three-ordinances Would also serve as ratification on behalf of the population unincorporated King County, for these changes and initiate the process' of ratification by the cities. SYNOPSIS OF ISSUES Pursuant to CPP' FW-1 step 9,' the Growth Management Planning Council' ("GMPC") made recommendations contained in GMPC Motions 08-5, 08-6 and 08-7. Proposed Ordinance 2008-0620 would approve 'the Irecommendations contained in GMPC Motions 0875 and 08-6. Proposed Ordinance 200.8-0621_ would approve the :recommendation contained in GMPC''Motion 08-7.. Those' motions recommend the following: 1. GMPC Motion 08-5, recommending the amendment of the interim potential annexation areas map to include a portion of unincorporated urban area formally referred to as the Polygon 4-to I to Maple Valley's PAA; 2. GMPC Motion 08-6, recommending land redesignation and amendment of the interim potential annexation areas maps to include fifteen of the executive's proposed map amendments,submitted by the Executive as part of his proposed 2008 updates to the County's Comprehensive Plan; and I 3.- GMPC Motion 08-7, recommending land redesignation the amendment of the interim potential annexation areas map to include the County's Summit Pit property as part of Maple Valley's PAA. I Also before the Council is Proposed Ordinance 2008-0622, which would approve UGB and PAA changes regarding Reserve at Covington Creek. This map amendment to the CPPs was not initiated at the GMPC but rather by action taken as part of the 2008 King County_Comprehensive Plan Update. . I Passage of these ordiances will intiate the ratification process to ensure consistency between the King County Comprehensive Plan and the CPPs. BACKGROUND: The GMPC is a formal body comprised of,elected officials from King County, Seattle, Bellevue, the Suburban r Cities, and-Special Districts. The GMPC was created in 1992 by interlocal agreement, in response to a provision in the Washington State Growth Management Act ("GMA") requiring cities and counties to work together to adopt CPPs. Under GMA, CPPs serve as the framework for each individual jurisdiction's L, comprehensive plan, and ensure countywide consistency with respect to land use planning efforts. As provided for in the,interlocal agreement, the GMPC developed and I recommended the Countywide Planning Policies; which were adopted by the King County Council and ratified by the cities. Subsequent amendments to the CPPs may either be initiated by GMPC recommendations via motions or by King County Council action, followed by King County Council ratification, and, finally ratification by the cities. Amendments to the .CPPs become effective when ratified by ordinance or resolution by at least 30% of the city and county governments representing at least 70% of the population of King County. A city shall be deemed to have-ratified an amendment to the CPPs unless, within 90 days of adoption by King County, the city by legislative action disapproves it. SUMMARY: Proposed Ordinances 2008-0620, 2008-0621 and 2008-0622 would amend the CPPs by making adjustments to the Urban Growth Area, Potential Annexation Area, and Urban Separator maps. As part of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update, the King County Council made - several changes to the urban growth area boundary. Because the GMA requires the County's Comprehensive Plan to be consistent with the CPPs, these amendments necessitate changes to the Urban Growth Area map in the countywide planning document. The County's.redesignation of lands from rural to urban also..requires, changes to the Potential Annexation Area maps, since urban areas are to eventually be annexed by cities. In one instance, an amendment would require a change to the Urban Separator map (Lake Desire). Because the Council had already made the policy decision(s) to amend the Urban Growth Area in the 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update, a detailed discussion of the individual map amendments is not included in this staff report. A brief description of each of the proposed changes is included below. Additionally, at Attachment 3 are the GCMP staff reports that contain more detailed descriptions of each of these changes. Attachment 4 is the map amendments adopted' as part of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan Updates in support of the change to the Urban Growth Boundary for the Reserve at Covington Creek. Adoption of the Proposed Ordinances would conform the CPPs to the 2008 Comprehensive Plan as follows: A. Proposed Ordinance 2008-0620/GMPC Motion 08-5 Amendments to the countywide Potential Annexation Areas map 1. Polygon n 4-1 — Include this already urban area into Maple Valley's PAA. B. Proposed Ordinance 2008-0620/GMPC Motion 08-6 -Amendments to the countywide Urban Growth Area Boundary map and/or, where noted, amendments to the countywide Potential Annexation Areas map or to the I countywide Urban Separator map 1. Carnation — redesignate 12 acres,from rural to urban and include in Carnation's PAA. 2. Sammamish: Mystic Lake and Camden Park redesignate approximately 45 acres of the single property referred to as Mystic Lake and include in Sammamish's PAA. Redesignate the rural portion of the existing r Camden Park neighborhood to urban and include these and,the rest of the neighborhood in Sammamish's PAA.. 3. Bellevue Coal Creek Park- redesignate the Park from rural to urban and include it in Bellevue's.PAA. 4. Enumclaw Fairgrounds and Sportsman Park— redesignate the Fairgrounds and Park from rural;to urban and include in Enumclaw's PAA. 5. Maple Valley Rock Creek Technical Correction —correct the designate of 22 f properties that are within the Rural Area but which the Land Use map incorrectly designates as urban. 6. Black Diamond Crow Marsh Technical Correction redesignate County-owned parcels from urban to rural and remove from Black Diamond's PAA. . 7. Maple Valley Dorre Don Reach Technical Correction — redesignate County-owned parcels from urban to rural and remove from Maple Valley's PAA. 8. Bear Creek Kathryn Taylor Park Technical Correction - redesignate County-owned parcels.from urban to rural. 9. Maple Valley Technical Correction — remove an urban land use designation from property outside the UGA. This corrects a mapping error. i 10. Black Diamond.Technical Correction — refine the East Annexation Area of Black Diamond to reflect the exact, rather than estimated border, of that area.and include it in Black Diamond's PAA j 11. Lake Desire Urban Separator—designate an 85 acre Urban Separator on the north and east side of Lake Desire, located in Renton's PAA. 12. Snogualmie Interchange (also referred to as the Snoqualmie Hospital project) - NOT. ADOPTED AS PART OF THE KING COUNTY 2008 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATES 13. Issaquah Eastridge Christian Assembly— redesignate 3 parcels and part of another from rural to urban and include in Issaquah's PAA. i 14. Sammamish Duthie Notch— NOT ADOPTED AS PART OF THE KING COUNTY 2008 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATES 15. Duvall/Burhen — redesignate approximately 40 acres from rural to urban and include in Duvall's PAA. NOTE: Although the GMPC recommended the redesignation of property from rural to urban for both the Snoqualmie Interchange and Duthie Hill, bordering Sammamish, and inclusion of those properties in the respective PAAs., the Council rejected these proposals during the Comprehensive Plan Update. Therefore, these recommendations are not included in the proposed ordinance for ratification. C. Proposed Ordinance 2008-0621/GMPC Motion 084 -Amendments to the countywide Urban Growth Area Boundary map and to the countywide Potential Annexation Areas map: 1. Maple Valley Summit Pit- redesignate 156 acres from rural to-urban'and include in Maple Valley's PAA. NOTE: The GMPC voted to recommend the land use redesignation and PAA designation on October 2, 2008.' The passage of this recommendation occurred after Maple Valley had withdrawn its objections and had executed a memorandum of agreement with the Executive,which promising joint planning for the future development of this parcel. D. Proposed Ordinance 2008-0622 Amendments to the,countywide Urban Growth Area Boundary map and to the countywide Potential Annexation Areas map: 1. Reserve at Covington Creek (Black Diamond)— redesignate approximately 51 acres from rural�to urban and includes the area in Black Diamond's PAA NOTE: At the September 17, 2008 meeting, the GMPC voted not to recommend this map amendment because of Black Diamond's expressed indifference. However, prior to taking final action of the 2008 Comprehensive Plah.Updates, the City of Black Diamond submitted written assent to the redesignation and the adding of the property into its PAA. STAFF ANALYSIS: The actions contemplated by these ordinances are consistent with the land u.se map amendments adopted in the 2008 updates to the King County Comprehensive Plan. AMENDMENTS: There are technical corrections to each of the proposed ordinances as outlined below: ' I A. Amendment 1 to Proposed Ordinance 2008-0620: j 1. Removes paragraphs A and B from the*findings. These findings are,not necessary. They add nothing in way of explanation to this legislation and refer to old actions unrelated to this legislation.-* egislation:* In the last ordinance adopted by the Council that ratified changes to the CPPs, these paragraphs.were removed. 2. Attaches the,relevant GMPC, mofions'(08-5 and 08-6) and their attached map amendments.; and correctly references them so,as to,correspond.to the ordinance language. B. Amendment 1:to Proposed Ordinance 2008.0621 1. Removes paragraphs A and B from the findings. 2. Adds the Maple Valley maps to the Attachment A (GMPC motion 08-7), C. Amendment 1 to Proposed Ordinance 2008-0622 I 1. Removes paragraphs A and B from the findings. 2. Deletes incorrect reference at paragraph W on page 4, line 67. The corrected language would be a single sentence which would read: Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies are amended as shown by Attachment A of this ordinance. 3. At page 8,-line 148, that sentence is rewritten to provide clear direction that the'area redesignated from rural to urban shall be included in Black Diamond's PAA. I �I i a KING COUNTY 1200 King County Courthouse 516 Third Avenue Seattle,WA 98104 King County Signature Report December 15, 2008 Ordinance 16336 Proposed No. 2008-0622.2 Sponsors Gossett 1 AN ORDINANCE adopting amendments to the 2 Countywide Planning Policies; amending the interim 3 potential annexation areas map and ratifying the amended 4 Countywide Planning Policies for unincorporated King 5 County; and amending Ordinance 10450, Section 3, as 6 amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.030 and Ordinance 10450, 7 Section 4, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.040. 8 9 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY: 10 SECTION 1. Findings: The council makes the-following findings: 11 As part of the King County council's review of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan 12 updates, the council adopted amendment to the Urban Growth Boundary near the city of 13 Black Diamond as set forth in Attachment A to this ordinance. 14 SECTION 2. Ordinance 10450, Section 3, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.030 are 15 each hereby amended to read as follows: 16 A. The Phase II Amendments.to the King County 2012 Countywide Planning 17 Policies attached to Ordinance 11446 are hereby approved and adopted. • 1 Ordinance 16336 18 B. The Phase II Amendments.to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 19 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12027. j , 20 C. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 21 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12421. it 22 D. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning 23 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments 1 and 2 to Ordinance 13260. 24 E. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning 25 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments 1 through 4 to Ordinance 13415. 26 F. The Phase 11 Amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning 27 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 13858. 28 G. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012—Countywide Planning 29 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14390. I 30 H. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012—Countywide Planning 31 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14391. 32 I. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012—Countywide Planning E 33 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14392: 34 J. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 35 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 1465.2. tti 36 K. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning 37 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 14653. 38 L. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide Planning 39 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment l to Ordinance 14654. 2 Ordinance 16336 40 M. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 41 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14655. 42 N. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 43 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments 1 and 2 to Ordinance 14656. 44 O. The Phase II amendments to the King County 2012—Countywide Planning 45 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment A to Ordinance 14844. 46 P. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 47 Policies are amended as shown by Attachments A, B and C to Ordinance 15121. 48 Q. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 49 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment A to Ordinance 15122. 50 R. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 51 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment A to Ordinance 15123. 52 S. Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning 53 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments A and B to Ordinance 15426. 54 T. Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning 55 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments A,B and C to Ordinance 15709. 56 U. Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning 57 Policies are amended,' as shown by Attachment A. to Ordinance 16056. 58 V. Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning 59 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments A, B, C, D, E and F to Ordinance 16151. 60 W. Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 —Countywide Planning 61 Policies are amended as shown by Attachment A to this ordinance. 3 Ordinance 16336 62 SECTION 3. Ordinance 10450, Section 4, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.040 are 63 each hereby amended to read as follows: _- 64 A. Countywide Planning Policies.adopted by Ordinance 10450 for the purposes r i 65 specified are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. 66 B. The amendments to the,Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 67 10840,are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. 68 C. The amendments to the.Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 69 11061 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. 70 D. The,Phase II amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide Planning f 71 Policies adopted by Ordinance 11446 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of 72 unincorporated King County. 73 E. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as, I 74 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12027 are hereby ratified on behalf of the 75 population of unincorporated King County. 76 F. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as s 77 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12421, are hereby ratified on behalf of the I ' 78 population of unincorporated King County. 79 G. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as i 80 shown by Attachments 1 and 2 to Ordinance 13260, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 81 population of unincorporated King County. 82 H. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 83 shown by Attachment 1 through 4 to Ordinance 13415, are hereby ratified on behalf of i 84 the population of unincorporated King County. 4 Ordinance 16336 85 I. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 86 shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 13858, are hereby ratified on behalf of 87 the population of unincorporated King County. 88 J. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 89 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14390, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 90 population of unincorporated King County. 91 K. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 92 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14391, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 93 population of unincorporated King County. 94 L. The amendments to the Icing County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 95 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14392, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 96 population of unincorporated King County. 97 M. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 98 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14652,'are hereby ratified on behalf of the 99 population of unincorporated King County. 100 N. The amendments to the King County 2012- Countywide Planning Policies, as 101 shown by Attachments'1 through 3 to Ordinance 14653, are hereby ratified on behalf of 102 the population of unincorporated King County. 103 O. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 104 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14654, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 105 population of unincorporated King County. 5 i Ordinance 16336 j 106 P. The amendments to the King County 2012 -_Countywide Planning Policies, as 107 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14655, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 108 population of unincorporated King County. 109 Q. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 110 shown by Attachments 1 and 2 to.Ordinance 14656, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 111 population of unincorporated King County. 112 R. The amendments to the King County 2012—Countywide Planning Policies,as I 113 shown by Attachment A to Ordinance 14844, are'hereby ratified on behalf of the 114 population of unincorporated King County. I 115 S. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 116 shown by Attachments A, B and C to Ordinance 15121, are hereby ratified on behalf of 117 the population of unincorporated King County. 118 T. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 119 shown by Attachment A to Ordinance 15122, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 120 population of unincorporated King County. 121 U. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 122 shown.by Attachment A to Ordinance 15123, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 123, population of unincorporated King County. 124 V. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 125 shown by Attachments A and B to Ordinance 15426, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 126 population of unincorporated King County. i 1 I 6 Ordinance 16336 127 W. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, 128 as shown by Attachments A, B and C to Ordinance 15709, are hereby ratified on behalf 129 of the population of unincorporated King County. 130 X. The amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning Policies, as 131 shown by Attachment A to Ordinance 16056, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 132 population of unincorporated King County.' 133 Y. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 134 shown by Attachments A, B, C,D, E and F to Ordinance 16151, are hereby ratified on 135 behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. 136 Z. The amendment to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies as 137 shown by Attachment A of this ordinance is hereby ratified on behalf of the population 138 of unincorporated King.County. Additionally, by this ordinance an amendment to the 139 Interim Potential Annexation Area Map to include any additional unincorporated urban 140 land created by the Urban Growth Area(UGA) amendment in the Potential Annexation 141 7 i Ordinance 16336 142 Area of the city of Black Diamond is hereby ratified on behalf of the population of 143 unincorporated King County. I i 144 I Ordinance 16336 was introduced on 12/8/2008 and passed by the.Metropolitan King County Council on 12/15/2008,by the-following vote: f Yes: 7 -Ms. Patterson, Mr. Constantine, Ms. Lambert, Mr. von Reichbauer, Mr. Ferguson,Mr. Gossett and Mr. Phillips, No: 0 Excused: 2 -Mr. Dunn and Ms. Hague . KING COUNTY COUNCIL KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON R J li Patterson,Chair ,x; `coy' ATTEST: Q r coo -V-j ; © . J t Anne Noris,Clerk of-the Council t X_ C� G7 APPROVED this day of �CUtihG2,2008. Ron Sims,County Executive I Attachments A.Map Amendment 29 I i • 1 I i I 8 Attachment A Map Amendment 29 Reserve at Covington Creek UGA 1 2 AMENDMENT TO THE KING COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE.PLAN-LAND USE 3 MAP 4 5 - 6 Amend Map#22, Section 4,Township 21, Range 6 as follows: 7 8 Redesignate the following parcels from Rural Residential to Rural City Urban Growth 9 Area. 10 11 ® 0421069008 12 • 0421069011 13 • 0421069106 14 15 16 17 Amend all other KCCP and Technical Appendix maps that include the Urban Growth 18 Area to be consistent with this change. 19 20 Effect: Adds approximately 51.09 acres to the Urban Growth Area near the city of Black 21 Diamond: 11 acres--Kentlake Athletic Field and 40.09 acres-Reserve at Covington 22 Creek. i i i N N Reserve at Covington Creek Land Use Map King C-nV ��.�.F N1aa�r�ydavw Nb WtlbNaq .,wa" dam• IncorporatedAraas 1W~eeo Y M'.lr.ftl b rr r �v./ • . np corgi•iw M 6.uH.'tr n/cw+i,� Urban Growth Boundary Yr Rural Residential 1 du/2.5-10 acres rnwrdr,.w.Jq malndm mµ N.;wd ,h erp b./am:�.,wi mb m•pbpltm wgM.mn , °""""d°°�"'" �� • Proposed Urban 4DO o 400 " Growth Boundary ►k Rural City Urban Growth Area i Far Change Area f E24}F 467' i ■ ■// Urn ■ ■ b 7 f 6439F,}VA ► ■ ■i >< RX ■ m ■ j ■ MR t i 2 I . j Map Amendment 29 f Reserve at Covington Creek UGA t 2 AMENDMENT TO THE KING COUNTY ZONING ATLAS 3 4 C 5 Amend Map#22, Section 4,Township 21,Range 6 as follows: 6 7 Reclassify parcel 0421069106 from RA-5 to R-4 s 9 Reclassify parcels 0421069008and 042106.9011 from RA-5 to UR-P, subj ect*to the to following p-suffix conditions: 11 12 Development shall be consistent with all City of Black Diamond plans, regulation. 13 and guidelines; 14 15 King County and any development applicant shall address traffic in the area to 16 ensure existing conditions are addressed and improved=not degraded by any 17 future development; and 18 19 The applicant shall enter into a pre-annexation agreement that includes the use of r 20 rural transfer of development rights and the conservation of at least four acres of 21 rural land for every acre of urban land. 22 23 Effect- 24 25 Rezones 51.09 acres from RA-5 near the city of Black Diamond, as follows: 11 acres 26 of R-4 zoning for Kentlake Athletic Field and 40.09 acres of UR zoning for Reserve 27 at Covington Creek. 28 29 Adds a p-suffix to any future urban development on the Reserve at Covington Creek 30 requiring consistency with city of Black Diamond plans,regulations and standards j 31 and addressing and improving future traffic conditions, as well as,requiring a pre- 32 annexation agreement including the use of TDRs to conserve 4 acres of rural land for 1 33 each new acre of urban land: l 1 i I E I 7 3 " Reserve at Covington Creek LQ Zoning Mapc��r m.rbmm.b4tlN A en+o tie e..r urpe 4 wp owq.Auls,.a.Mya mm.e n verd rawp. '�° °°"" "'•" ""'°""°'+ Incorporated Areas •Y u.b.o Syr r r.m d�Na..ma Tr��b ml NMJ p�e• PobLL Urban Growth Boundary UR Urban Reserve +eba�a s bbmfenmYiwO m.i a.{¢�W a Proposed Urban RA-5 Rural Area,7 du/5 acres 400 200 0 400 Growth Boundary Fed ChangeArea RA-5 ■ ■ ■ R-0-P 11 to a ■ ■ ■ ■1� RA-s UR ■ ■ ■ ■ - - - � - - f a King County Metropolitan King County Council Growth Management and Natural Resources Committee Agenda Item 6, 7 & 8 Date: December 15, 2008 No.. - 2008-0620 Proposed Ord.: 2008-0621 Prepared by: Kendall Moore 2008-0622 Rick Bautista Invited: Paul Reitenbach, DDES REVISED- STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: Substitute Proposed Ordinance 2008-0620 which would ratify the recommendations made by at the September 17, 2008 meeting of Growth Management Planning Council and forwarded to- the County Council for action regarding redesignation 'of land use for 13 properties that the Council already approved as part of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan Updates. A technical amendment was offered. Substitute Proposed Ordinance 2008-0621 which would- ratify the recommendations made by at the October 2, 2008 meeting of Growth Management Planning Council and forwarded to the County Council for action regarding redesignation of land use for the Summit Pit property that the Council already approved as part of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan Updates. A technical amendment was offered. Substitute Proposed Ordinance 2008-0622 which would ratify on behalf of the citizens of unincorporated King County the redesignation of rual to urban property referred to as the Reserve at that the Council already approved as part of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan Updates. A technical amendment was offered. COMMITTEE ACTION: On December 8, 2008, the the Growth Management& Natural, Resources Committee approved Ordinances 2008-0620 through 2008-0622 as amended, with a do pass recommendation, subject to signatures, and placed them on the consent calendar. SUBJECT Three ordinances, the passage of which would approvb of changes to the Urban Growth Boundary and interim potential annexation areas ("PAAs") already adopted in the 2008 updates to the King County King Comprehensive Plan. For the purposes of the County-wide Planning Policies ("CPPs"), adoption of these three ordinances would also serve as ratification on behalf of the population unincorporated King County for these, changes and I initiate the process of ratification by the cities. SYNOPSIS OF ISSUES Pursuant to CPP FWA step 9, the Growth Management Planning Council ("GMPC") made recommendations contained in GMPC Motions 08-5, 08-6 and 08-7. Proposed Ordinance 2008-0620 would approve the recommendations contained in GMPC Motions 08-5 and 08-6. Proposed Ordinance 2008-0621 would approve the recommendation contained in GMPC Motion 08-7. Those motions recommend the following: 1. GMPC Motion 08-5, recommending the amendment of the interim potential annexation areas map to include a portion of unincorporated urban area formally referred to as the Polygon 4 to 1, to Maple Valley's PAA; 2. GMPC Motion 08-6, recommending land redesignation and amendment of the interim potential annexation areas maps to include fifteen of the executive's proposed map amendments submitted by the Executive as part of his proposed 2008 updates to the County's Comprehensive Plan; and 3. GMPC Motion 08-7, recommending land redesignation the amendment of the interim potential annexation areas map to include the County's Summit Pit property as part of Maple Valley's PAA. Also before the Council is Proposed Ordinance 2008-0622, which would approve UGB and PAA changes regarding Reserve at Covington Creek. This map amendment to the CPPs was not initiated at the GMPC but rather by action taken as part of the 2008 King County Comprehensive Plan Update. Passage of these ordiances will intiate the ratification process to ensure consistency between the King County Comprehensive Plan and the CPPs. BACKGROUND: The GMPC is a formal body comprised of elected officials from King County, Seattle, Bellevue, the Suburban Cities, and-Special Districts. The GMPC was created in 1992 by interlocal agreement, in response to a provision in the Washington State Growth Management Act ("GMA") requiring cities and counties to work together to adopt CPPs. Under GMA, CPPs serve as the framework for each individual jurisdiction's comprehensive plan, and ensure countywide consistency with respect to land use planning efforts. As provided for in the interlocal agreement, the GMPC developed and recommended the Countywide Planning Policies, which were adopted by the King County Council and ratified by the cities. Subsequent amendments to the CPPs may either be initiated by GMPC recommendations via motions or by King County Council action, followed by King County Council ratification, and, finally ratification by the cities. Amendments to the CPPs become effective when ratified by ordinance or resolution by at least 30% of the city and county governments representing at least 70% of the population of King County. A city shall be deemed to have ratified an amendment to the CPPs unless, within 90 days of adoption by King County, the city by legislative action disapproves it. SUMMARY: Proposed Ordinances 2008-0620, 2008-0621 and 2008-0622 would amend the CPPs by making adjustments to the Urban Growth Area, Potential Annexation Area, and Urban Separator maps. 1 As part of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update, the King County Council made several changes to the urban growth area boundary. Because the GMA requires the County's Comprehensive Plan to be consistent with the CPPs, these amendments ■ necessitate changes to the Urban Growth Area map in the countywide planning document. The County's redesignation of lands from rural to urban also requires changes to the Potential Annexation Area maps, since urban areas are to eventually be annexed by cities. In one instance, an amendment would require a change to the Urban Separator map (Lake Desire). Because the Council had already made the policy decision(s)to amend the Urban Growth Area in the 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update, a detailed discussion of the individual map amendments is not included in this staff report. A brief description of each of the proposed changes is included below. Additionally, at Attachment 3 are the GCMP staff reports that contain more detailed descriptions of each of these changes. Attachment 4 is the map amendments adopted as part of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan Updates in support of the change to the Urban Growth Boundary for the Reserve at Covington Creek. Adoption of the Proposed Ordinances would conform the CPPs to the 2008 Comprehensive Plan as follows: A. Proposed Ordinance 2008-0620/GMPC Motion 08-5 -Amendments to the countywide Potential Annexation Areas map 1. Polygon 4-1 — Include this already urban area into Maple Valley's PAA. B. Proposed Ordinance 2008-0620/GMPC Motion 08-6 -Amendments to the countywide Urban Growth Area Boundary map and/or, where noted, amendments to the countywide Potential Annexation Areas ma or to the yW P countywide Urban Separator map 1. Carnation —redesignate 12 acres from rural to urban a u Carnation's PAA. g b n and include�n ar 2. Sammamish: Mystic Lake and Camden Park—redesignate approximately 45 acres of j the single property referred to as Mystic Lake and include in Sammamish's PAA. Redesignate the rural portion of the existing Camden Park-neighborhood to urban rand . include these and the rest of the neighborhood in Sammamish's PAA. 3. Bellevue Coal Creek Park- redesignate the Park from rural to urban and include it in Bellevue's PAX 4. Enumclaw Fairgrounds and Sportsman Park— redesignate the Fairgrounds and Park from rural to urban and include in Enumclaw's PAA. 5. Maple Valley Rock Creek Technical Correction —correct the designate of 22 properties that are within the Rural Area but which the Land Use map incorrectly designates as urban. 6. Black Diamond Crow Marsh Technical Correction —redesignate County-owned parcels from urban to rural and remove from Black Diamond's PAA. . 7. Maple Valley Dorre Don Reach Technical Correction—redesignate County-owned parcels from urban to rural and remove from Maple Valley's PAA. 8. Bear Creek Kathryn Taylor Park Technical Correction - redesignate County-owned parcels from urban to rural. 9. Maple Valley Technical Correction— remove an urban land use designation from property outside the UGA. This corrects a mapping error. 10. Black Diamond Technical Correction —refine the East Annexation Area of Black Diamond to reflect the exact, rather than estimated border, of that area and include it in Black Diamond's PAA 11. Lake Desire Urban Separator—designate an 85 acre Urban Separator on the north and east side of Lake Desire, located in Renton's PAA. 12. Snogualmie Interchange (also referred to as the Snoqualmie Hospital project) - NOT ADOPTED AS PART OF THE KING COUNTY 2008 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATES 13. Issaquah Eastridge Christian Assembly—redesignate 3 parcels and part of another from rural to urban and include in Issaquah's PAA. 14. Sammamish Duthie Notch— NOT ADOPTED AS PART OF THE KING COUNTY 2008 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATES 15. Duvall/Burhen—redesignate approximately 40 acres from rural to urban and include in Duvall's PAA. NOTE: Although the GMPC recommended the redesignation of property.from rural to urban for both the Snoqualmie Interchange and Duthie Hill, bordering Sammamish, and inclusion of those properties in the respective PAAs,the Council rejected these proposals during the Comprehensive Plan Update. Therefore, these recommendations are not included in the proposed ordinance for ratification. C. Proposed Ordinance 2008-0621/GMPC Motion 084 -Amendments to the countywide Urban Growth Area Boundary map and to the countywide Potential Annexation Areas map: 1. Maple Valley Summit Pit—redesignate 156 acres from rural to urban and include in Maple Valley's PAA. NOTE: The GMPC voted to recommend the land use redesignation and PAA designation on October 2, 2008. The passage of this recommendation occurred after Maple Valley had withdrawn its objections and had executed a memorandum of agreement with the Executive, which promising joint planning for the future development of this parcel. D. Proposed Ordinance 2008-0622 Amendments to the countywide Urban Growth Area Boundary map and to the countywide Potential Annexation Areas map: 1. Reserve at Covington Creek (Black Diamond)— redesignate approximately 51 acres from rural to urban and includes the area in Black Diamond's PAA. NOTE: At the September 17, 2008 meeting, the GMPC voted not to recommend this map amendment because of Black Diamond's expressed indifference. However, prior to taking final action of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan Updates, the City of Black Diamond submitted written assent to the redesignation and the adding of the property into its PAX STAFF ANALYSIS. The actions contemplated by these ordinances are consistent with the land use map amendments adopted in the 2008 updates to the King County Comprehensive Plan. AMENDMENTS: There are technical corrections to each of the proposed ordinances as outlined below: A. Amendment 1 to Proposed Ordinance 2008-0620: 1. Removes A and B from the*findin s.paragraphs g These findings are not necessary. They add nothing in way of explanation to this legislation and refer to old actions unrelated to this legislation. In the last ordinance adopted by the Council that ratified changes to the CPPs, these paragraphs were removed. 2. Attaches the relevant GMPC motions (68-5 and 08-6) and their attached map amendments; and correctly references them so as to correspond to the ordinance language. B. Amendment 1 to Proposed Ordinance 2008-0621 1. Removes paragraphs A and B from the findings. 2. Adds the Maple Valley maps to the Attachment A (GMPC motion 08-7). C. Amendment 1 to Proposed Ordinance 2008-0622 1. Removes paragraphs A and B from the findings. 2. Deletes incorrect reference at paragraph W on page 4, line 67. The corrected language would be a single sentence which would read: Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies are amended as shown by Attachment A of this ordinance. 3. At page 8, line 148, that sentence is rewritten to provide clear direction that the*area redesignated from rural to urban shall be included in Black Diamond's PAA. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Fred N. Satterstrom, AICP, Director • PLANNING SERVICES K E N T Charlene Anderson,AICP, Manager WASHINGTON Phone: 253-856-5454 Fax: 253-856-6454 Address: 220 Fourth Avenue S. Kent, INA 98032-5895 jJanuary 30, 2009 To: Chair Elizabeth Albertson and Planning & Economic Development Committee Members From: Michael Hubner, King County Suburban Cities Association Subject: Briefing Paper: GMA Growth Targets Update for King County For Information Only This staff report was adapted from a briefing paper prepared by King County and Suburban Cities Association staff as an overview of the growth targets update process for elected officials, policy staff, and the public. Planning for growth under the Growth Management Act Under Washington State's GMA, King County and its cities must adopt comprehensive plans that accommodate 20 years of anticipated population and employment growth. Plans must provide for levels of land use and density, capital facilities and transportation infrastructure that are sufficient to meet future needs. Local governments have discretion as to how they will accommodate the growth within their borders. The GMA provides a schedule for required updates to plans and growth allocations. Local jurisdictions must update their comprehensive plans at least every 7 years. Cities in King County last completed their plan updates in 2004. The deadline for the next plan update is December 2011. Every five years, the state Office of Financial Management (OFM) issues population projections for each county in the state as a basis for GMA planning. Based on these projections, counties and cities collaborate in determining local allocations of that growth. The act requires that local growth numbers be updated at least every ten years. (See RCW 36.70A.130.) Fig. 1 below gives an overview of the timing of GMA planning actions discussed in this briefing paper. Fig. 1: Timeline for GMA Planning in King County CPPs OFM Projections Comp Plan Updates Growth Targets(current) Growth Targets(update) f . G 5 New growth projections for King County The current growth allocations ("targets") for King County are based on population projections that were released by the OFM in 2002. A new set of OFM projections for each county was released in late 2007. The updated figures show King County growing at a faster rate than i previously forecasted. The result is that King County is expected to have nearly 100,000 more people in 2022 than currently planned for. Overall, the county is expected to grow by about 450,000 people between 2006 and 2031 to a total population of 2.3 million. Fig. 2 below shows the new projection as an extension of historical trends and also compared with the previous OFM projection. Over this same period, the Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) is forecasting employment growth in King County of nearly 450,000 jobs to a total of 1.7 million jobs. PSRC forecasts are the basis for job growth targets for GMA planning in the county and its cities. Fig. 2: Projected Population Growth in King County per WA State OFM i OFM Population Trends/Forecasts for King County Numbers in thousands 2,500 - --_---_- _ 2,300 OFM 2007 2,263 Forecast 2,11� 2,100 1,900 — 1,93 2,019 1,808 1,700 1,737, 001- 1,764 1,500 1,50Z OFM 2002 Forecast 1,300 - — E 1,100 11,140 t 900 — Population 935 Trend i 700 500 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 i t Coordination of growth targets by Growth Management Planning Council The GMPC is a formal body, consisting of elected officials from King County, Seattle, Bellevue, other cities and towns in King County, special purpose districts, and the Port of Seattle. (Kent Councilmember Ron Harmon is an alternate on the GMPC.) Established to meet a GMA requirement for coordinated planning, the GMPC has as its primary function the development and adoption of Countywide Planning Policies (CPPs). Growth allocations are adopted as part of the CPPs in the form of household and job growth targets. King County's CPPs, including growth targets for the 1992-2012 planning period, were originally adopted by the GMPC in 1994. The targets were updated in 2002, for a planning period extending to 2022. The county and cities incorporated those targets into their 2004 plan updates. The GMPC will be considering new updates to the targets based on the new population projections from OFM and providing E i PEDC Meeting j February 9, 2009 Prepared by King County and Suburban Cities Association 1/28/09 Page 2 of 4 i i substantive guidance to cities as they update their 20-year comprehensive plans once again. New growth targets would extend the countywide planning period out another 9 years, with a horizon of 2031, 20 years beyond the 2011 comprehensive plan update requirement. The CPPs establish the policy framework for allocating growth targets. Those policies include 1) limiting growth in Rural and Resource areas, 2) focusing growth within the existing urban area, within cities, and within designated Urban and Manufacturing/Industrial Centers, 3) improving jobs-housing balance within four planning subareas, and 4) fostering a pattern of growth that ensures efficient use of infrastructure and can be served by public transportation. Development of the targets occurs through extensive coordination among staff from throughout the county. The interjurisdictional staff team that supports the GMPC has convened a growth targets committee comprised of senior planning staff from the cities and King County, including Kent. The role of this committee is to develop proposed housing and job growth targets for each city and unincorporated area. This process is guided by basic principles. Every jurisdiction is expected to take its fair share of growth. The rationale for target allocation is based on best available demographic, economic, and land use data, and also incorporates unique factors and local policies. Finally, the targets are to be adopted through countywide agreement at the GMPC, including both county and city governments. New guidance for growth targets under Vision 2040. The Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) recently adopted Vision 2040, a growth management, transportation, and economic development strategy for the 4-county region. With Vision 2040, the PSRC has amended its Multicounty Planning Policies (MPPs) to address coordinated action around a range of policy areas, including land use and development patterns. The GMPC will be updating its countywide policies in 2010 to bring them into consistency with the MPPs. Vision 2040 also contains a Regional Growth Strategy that provides substantive guidance for planning for the roughly 1.7 million additional people and 1.2 million additional jobs expected in the region between 2000 and 2040. The Strategy retains much of the discretion that counties and cities have in setting local targets, while calling for broad shifts in where growth locates within the region. In comparison to current CPPs and comprehensive plans, the Strategy calls for: o Increasing the amount of growth targeted to cities that contain regionally designated urban centers (to include both metropolitan centers and many suburban cities, including the City of Kent) o Increasing the amount of growth targeted to other large cities (with combined population and employment of at least 22,500) o Decreasing the amount of growth targeted to Urban designated unincorporated areas, Rural designated unincorporated areas, and to smaller cities o Achieving a greater jobs-housing balance within the region PEDC Meeting February 9, 2009 Prepared by King County and Suburban Cities Association 1/28/09 Page 3 of 4 i i New growth targets for King County are expected to move toward achieving the desired pattern of growth laid out in Vision 2040, while also recognizing the long- term nature of the regional land use goals and the many challenges involved in "bending the trend" away from past growth patterns. The City of Kent has done well in accommodating growth during the current planning period. However, our region is an attractive one, and, despite the current downturn, is expected to continue to attract more people and jobs over the mid- to long-term future. "Core Cities" (suburban cities with Urban Centers) such as Kent are expected to take nearly a third of King County's growth over the 40-year Vision 2040 planning period. I Next steps The process of developing growth targets for King County is underway j now. In 2008, the GMPC directed staff to begin technical analysis as a basis for a staff recommendation in 2009. In the coming months, cities will be asked to review and provide input on a range of potential future growth scenarios. Based on this process, recommended draft targets may go to the GMPC as early as July 2009, with a vote for adoption possible at the council's September 2009 meeting. Once adopted, growth targets must be ratified by the county council and cities. l As described in this paper, the proposed update schedule for the CPPs and growth targets is intended to meet state, regional, and local policy objectives. Adopting targets ahead of the 2011 comprehensive plan updates will ensure that appropriate and timely planning can be done to accommodate projected growth. Many cities will find that their current land uses and densities do accommodate housing and jobs needed through 2031; others may need to adjust their plans and regulations in the 2011 update. With an updated CPP framework, including growth targets, in place, all cities will be in a much better position to align their plans with both Vision 2040 and the GMA. Questions about King County's growth targets can be directed to Kent planning staff, to Chandler Felt, King County Office of Strategic Planning at (206) 263-9693 / chandler.felt@kingcounty.gov, or to Michael Hubner, Suburban Cities Association at (253) 856-5443 / mhubner@ci.kent.wa.us. S:\Permit\Plan\COM P_PLAN_AMENDMENTS\2009\GMA\GMAtargets_pedc02O9O9.doc cc: Fred N Satterstrom, AICP, CD Director Charlene Anderson, AICP, Planning Manager Michael Hubner i PEDC Meeting February 9, 2009 Prepared by King County and Suburban Cities Association 1/28/09 Page 4 of 4 i Kent City Council Meeting Date February 17, 2009 Category Consent Calendar - 6E 1. SUBJECT: OLYMPIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES CONSULTANT CONTRACT - AUTHORIZE 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Authorize the Mayor to sign an agreement with Olympic Environmental Resources for Waste Reduction and Recycling Activities and Programs for 2009 in the amount of $66,760, subject to final agreement terms and conditions acceptable to the City Attorney and the Public Works Director. Olympic Environmental Resources organizes, implements, and provides management for the City of Kent's Waste Reduction and Recycling Programs, including Special Recycling and Collection events, Business and Multi-family recycling programs, compost bin sales, and outreach and education. 3. EXHIBITS: Public Works Memorandum dated 2/2/09 and Consultant Agreement 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? X Revenue? Currently in the Budget? Yes X No 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: 5 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Larry R. Blanchard, Public Works Director • ENT Phone: 253-856-5500 W A S H I N G T O N Fax: 253-856-6500 Address: 220 Fourth Avenue S. Kent, WA 98032-5895 Date: January 15, 2009 To: Chair Deborah Ranniger and Public Works Committee Members PW Committee Meeting Date: February 2, 2009 From: Mike Mactutis, P.E., Environmental Engineering Manager Through: Larry Blanchard, Public Works Director Subject: Olympic Environmental Resources - Consultant Contract Agreement Motion: Move to recommend authorization for the Mayor to sign the Olympic Environmental Resources Contract Agreement for Waste Reduction and Recycling Activities and Programs for 2009 in the amount of $66,760, upon concurrence of the language therein by the City Attorney and Public Works Director. Background/History: Olympic Environmental Resources organizes implements and provides management for the City of Kent's Waste Reduction and Recycling Programs, including Special Recycling and Collection events, Business and Multi-family recycling programs, compost bin sales and outreach and education. The consultant contract agreement is funded entirely through the following grants: Department of Ecology Coordinated Prevention Grant, Seattle-King County Health Department Local Hazardous Waste Management Program Grant, and King County Waste Reduction and Recycling Grant. In summary the consultant contract agreement for Olympic Environmental Resources in the amount of $66,760 is for implementing special programs, education and outreach for the City's waste reduction and recycling program in 2009, benefiting the citizens and businesses of Kent. P:IPablicW dolinSapW iVContnrifleeW ctionPage.doc 7 4eN! N w„sHr+aroN betweenCONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT the City Olympic Environmental Resources THIS AGREEMENT is made between the City of Kent, a Washington municipal corporation (hereinafter the "City"), and Olympic Environmental Resources organized under the laws of the State of Washington, located and doing business at 4715 SW Walker Street, Seattle, Washington 98116, Phone: (206) 938-8262/Fax: (206) 938-9873, Contact: Paul Devine (hereinafter the "Consultant"). I. DESCRIPTION OF WORK. Consultant shall perform the following services for the City In accordance with the following described plans and/or specifications: The Consultant shall organize two recycling collection events (Spring and Fall), promote business and residential recycling, organize a Spring compost bin sale, and provide grant administration. For a description, see the Consultant's January 7, 2009 Scope of Work which is attached as Exhibit A and incorporated by this reference. Consultant further represents that the services furnished under this Agreement will be performed in accordance with generally accepted professional practices within the Puget Sound region in effect at the time those services are performed. II. TIME OF COMPLETION. The parties agree that work will begin on the tasks described in Section I above immediately upon the effective date of this Agreement. Upon the effective date of this Agreement, Consultant shall complete the work described in Section I by December 31, 2009. III. COMPENSATION. A. The City shall pay the Consultant, based on time and materials, an amount not to exceed Sixty Six Thousand, Seven Hundred Sixty Dollars ($66,760.00) for the services described in this Agreement, This is the maximum amount to be paid . under this Agreement for the work described in Section I above, and shall not be exceeded without the prior written authorization of the City in the form of a negotiated and executed amendment to this agreement. The Consultant agrees that the hourly or flat rate charged by it for its services contracted for herein shall remain locked at the negotiated rate(s) for a period of one (1) year from the effective date of this Agreement. The Consultant's billing rates shall be as delineated in Exhibit A. CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT - 1 (Over$10,000) 8 B. The Consultant shall submit monthly payment invoices to the City for work performed, and a final bill upon completion of all services described in this Agreement. The City shall provide payment within forty-five (45) days of receipt of an invoice. If the City objects to all or any portion of an invoice, it shall notify the Consultant and reserves the option to only pay that portion of the invoice not in dispute. In that event, the parties will immediately make every effort to settle the disputed portion. IV. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. The parties intend that an Independent Contractor-Employer Relationship will be created by this Agreement and that the Consultant has the ability to control and direct the performance and details of its work, the City being interested only in the results obtained under this Agreement. V. TERMINATION. Either party may terminate this Agreement, with or without cause, upon providing the other party thirty (30) days written notice at its address set forth on the signature block of this Agreement. After termination, the City may take possession of all records and data within the Consultant's possession pertaining to this project, which may be used by the City without restriction. If the City's use of Consultant's records or data is not related to this project, it shall be without liability or legal exposure to the Consultant. f VI. DISCRIMINATION. In the hiring of employees for the performance of work under this Agreement or any subcontract, the Consultant, its subcontractors, or any person acting on behalf of the Consultant or subcontractor shall not, by reason of race, religion, color, sex, age, sexual orientation, national origin, or the presence of any sensory, mental, or physical disability, discriminate against any person who is qualified and available to perform the work to which the employment relates. Consultant shall execute the attached City of Kent Equal Employment Opportunity Policy Declaration, Comply with City Administrative Policy 1.2, and upon completion of the contract work, file the attached Compliance Statement. VII. INDEMNIFICATION. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, injuries, damages, losses or suits, including all legal costs and attorney fees, arising out of or in connection with the Consultant's performance of this Agreement, except for that portion of the injuries and damages caused by the City's negligence. The City's inspection or acceptance of any of Consultant's work when completed shall not be grounds to avoid any of these covenants of indemnification. Should a court of competent jurisdiction determine that this Agreement is subject to RCW 4,24.115, then, in the event of liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons or damages to property caused by or resulting from the concurrent negligence of the Consultant and the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers, the Consultant's liability hereunder shall be only to the extent of the Consultant's negligence. IT IS FURTHER SPECIFICALLY AND EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD THAT THE INDEMNIFICATION PROVIDED HEREIN CONSTITUTES THE CONSULTANT'S WAIVER OF IMMUNITY UNDER INDUSTRIAL INSURANCE, TITLE 51 RCW, SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS INDEMNIFICATION. THE PARTIES FURTHER ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THEY HAVE MUTUALLY NEGOTIATED THIS WAIVER. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT - 2 (Over$10,000) 9 VIII. INSURANCE. The Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement, insurance of the types and in the amounts described in Exhibit B attached and incorporated by this reference. IX. EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION. The City will provide its best efforts to provide reasonable accuracy of any information supplied by it to Consultant for the purpose of completion of the work under this Agreement. X. OWNERSHIP AND USE OF RECORDS AND DOCUMENTS. Original documents, drawings, designs, reports, or any other records developed or created under this Agreement shall belong to and become the property of the City. All records submitted by the City to the Consultant will be safeguarded by the Consultant. Consultant shall make such data, documents, and files available to the City upon the City's request. The City's use or reuse of any of the documents, data and files created by Consultant for this project by anyone other than Consultant on any other project shall be without liability or legal exposure to Consultant. XI. CITY'S RIGHT OF INSPECTION. Even though Consultant is an independent contractor with the authority to control and direct the performance and details of the work authorized under this Agreement, the work must meet the approval of the City and shall be subject to the City's general right of inspection to secure satisfactory completion. XII. WORK PERFORMED AT CONSULTANT'S RISK. Consultant shall take all necessary precautions and shall be responsible for the safety of its employees, agents, and subcontractors in the performance of the contract work and shall utilize all protection necessary for that purpose. All work shall be done at Consultant's own risk, and Consultant shall be responsible for any loss of or damage to materials, tools, or other articles used or held for use in connection with the work. XIII. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS. A. Recyclable Materials. Pursuant to Chapter 3.80 of the Kent City Code, the City requires its contractors and consultants to use recycled and recyclable products whenever practicable. A price preference may be available for any designated recycled product. B. Non-Waiver of Breach. The failure of the City to insist upon strict performance of any of the covenants and agreements contained in this Agreement, or to exercise any option conferred by this Agreement in one or more instances shall not be construed to be a waiver or relinquishment of those covenants, agreements or options, and the same shall be and remain in full force and effect. C. Resolution of Disputes and Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by .and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. If the parties are unable to settle any dispute, difference or claim arising from the parties' performance of this Agreement, the exclusive means of resolving that dispute, difference or claim, shall only be by filing suit exclusively under the venue, rules and jurisdiction of the King County Superior Court, King County, Washington, unless the parties agree in writing to an alternative dispute resolution process. In any claim or lawsuit for damages arising from the parties' performance of this Agreement, each party shall pay all its legal costs and attorney's fees incurred in defending or bringing such claim or lawsuit, including all appeals, in addition to any other recovery or award provided by law; provided, however, nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to limit the City's right to indemnification under Section VII of this Agreement. CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT - 3 (Over$10,000) i 10 D. Written Notice. All communications regarding this Agreement shall be sent to the parties at the addresses listed on the signature page of the Agreement, unless notified to the contrary. Any written notice hereunder shall become effective three (3) business days after the date of mailing by registered or certified mail, and shall be deemed sufficiently given if sent to the addressee at the address stated in this Agreement or such other address as may be hereafter specified in writing. E. Assignment. Any assignment of this Agreement by either party without the Written consent of the non-assigning party shall be void. If the non-assigning parry gives its consent to any assignment, the terms of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect and no further assignment shall be made without additional written consent. F. Modification. No waiver, alteration, or modification of any of the provisions of this Agreement shall be binding unless in writing and signed by a duly authorized representative of the City and Consultant. G. Entire Agreement. The written provisions and terms of this Agreement, together with any Exhibits attached hereto, shall supersede all prior verbal statements of any officer or other representative of the City, and such statements shall not be effective or be construed as entering into or forming a part of or altering in any manner this Agreement. All of the above documents are hereby made a part of this Agreement. However, should any language in any of the Exhibits to this Agreement conflict with any language contained in this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail. H. Compliance with Laws. The Consultant agrees to comply with all federal, state, and municipal laws, rules, and regulations that are now effective or in the future become applicable to Consultant's business, equipment, and personnel engaged in operations covered by this Agreement or accruing out of the performance of those operations. I. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts; each of which shall constitute an original, and all of which will together constitute this one Agreement. j IN WITNESS, the parties below execute this Agreement, which shall become effective on the last date entered below. CONSULTANT: CITY OF KENT: I By: By: (signature) (signature) Print Name: Print Name: Suzette Cooke Its Its Mayor (title) DATE: DATE: CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT - 4 (Over$10,000) 11 NOTICES TO BE SENT TO: NOTICES TO BE SENT TO: CONSULTANT: CITY OF KENT: Paul Devine Larry R. Blanchard Olympic Environmental Resources City of Kent 4715 SW Walker Street 220 Fourth Avenue South Seattle, WA 98116 Kent, WA 98032 (206) 938-8262 (telephone) (253) 856-5500 (telephone) (206) 938-9873 (facsimile) (253) 856-6500 (facsimile) APPROVED AS TO FORM: Kent Law Department M-2009 Recyclino/Hungerford CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT - 5 (over$10,000) 12 DECLARATION I CITY OF KNT EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY POLICY The City of Kent is committed to conform to Federal and State laws regarding equal opportunity. As such all contractors, subcontractors and suppliers who perform work with relation to this Agreement shall comply with the regulations of the City's equal employment opportunity policies. The following questions specifically identify the requirements the City deems necessary for any contractor, subcontractor or supplier on this specific Agreement to adhere to. An affirmative response is required on all of the following questions for this Agreement to be valid and binding. If any contractor, subcontractor or supplier willfully misrepresents themselves with regard to the directives outlines, it will be considered a breach of contract and it will be at the City's sole determination regarding suspension or termination for all or part of the Agreement; f The questions are as follows: 1. I have read the attached City of Kent administrative policy number 1.2. 2. During the time of this Agreement I will not discriminate in employment on the basis of sex, race, color, national origin, age, or the presence of all sensory, mental or physical disability. 3. During the time of this Agreement the prime contractor will provide a written statement to all new employees and subcontractors indicating commitment as an equal opportunity employer. i 4. During the time of the Agreement I, the prime contractor, will actively consider hiring and promotion of women and minorities. 5. Before acceptance of this Agreement, an adherence statement will be signed by me, the Prime Contractor, that the Prime Contractor compiled with the requirements as set forth above. By signing below, I agree to fulfill the five requirements referenced above. i i Dated this day of , 200.____. By: i For: Title: Date: EEO COMPLIANCE DOCUMENTS - 1 13 CITY OF KENT ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY NUMBER: 1.2 EFFECTIVE DATE: January 1, 1998 SUBJECT: MINORITY AND WOMEN SUPERSEDES: April 1, 1996 CONTRACTORS APPROVED BY Jim White, Mayor POLICY: Equal employment opportunity requirements for the City of Kent will conform to federal and state laws. All contractors, subcontractors, consultants and suppliers of the City must guarantee equal employment opportunity within their organization and, if holding Agreements with the City amounting to $10,000 or more within any given year, must take the following affirmative steps: 1. Provide a written statement to all new employees and subcontractors indicating commitment as an equal opportunity employer, 2. Actively consider for promotion and advancement available minorities and women. Any contractor, subcontractor, consultant or supplier who willfully disregards the City's nondiscrimination and equal opportunity requirements 'shall be considered in breach of contract and subject to suspension or termination for all or part of the Agreement. Contract Compliance Officers will be appointed by the Directors of Planning, Parks, and Public Works Departments to assume the following duties for their respective departments. 1. Ensuring that contractors, subcontractors, consultants, and suppliers subject to these regulations are familiar with the regulations and the City's equal employment opportunity policy. 2. Monitoring to assure adherence to federal, state and local laws, policies and guidelines. EEO COMPLIANCE DOCUMENTS - 2 14 CITY OF KENT EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMPLIANCE STATEMENT This form shall be filled out AFTER COMPLETION of this project by the Contractor awarded the Agreement. I, the undersigned, a duly represented agent of j Company, hereby acknowledge and declare that the before-mentioned company was the prime contractor for the Agreement known as that was entered into on the,_._, (date) , between the firm I represent and the City of Kent. I I declare that I complied fully with all of the requirements and obligations as outlined in the City of Kent Administrative Policy 1.2 and the Declaration City of Kent Equal Employment Opportunity Policy that was part of the before-mentioned Agreement. Dated this day of , 200 i By: For: i Title: Date: 1 I I I i EEO COMPLIANCE DOCUMENTS - 3 EXHIBIT A 15 2009 Scope of Work City of Kent 2009 Recycling Collection Events, Business Recycling Program, Residential Recycling Program, and Grant Administration PRIME CONTRACTOR Olympic Environmental Resources (OER) 4715 SW Walker Street Seattle, WA 98116 Phone: (206) 938-8262 Fax: (206) 938-9873 Email: pauldevine@msn.com TASK 1: Recycling Collection Events OER will organize two (Spring and Fail) citywide collection and recycling events in the City of Kent. A) Materials to be collected and recycled: Appliances+ Refrigerators and Freezers+ Ferrous Metals ■ Non-ferrous Metals ■ Scrap Wood* ■ Bulky Yard Debris* Concrete, Asphalt, Rock, and Brick** ■ Tires+ Lead Acid Batteries Household Batteries ■ Porcelain Toilets and Sinks+ Propane Tanks+ ■ Cardboard • Reusable Household Goods • Textiles ■ Motor Oil Motor Oil Filters Antifreeze ■ Petroleum Based Products ■ Paper Shredding" ■ Computer Equipment++ • Electronic Equipment/Cell Phones TV Sets++ +User fees apply ++User fees apply if the City decides to collect this material *Collected in the spring ** Collected in the fall 2009 OER Scop'e of R7ork 16 City of Kent January 7, 2009 B)The following educational materials will be distributed at the events: ■ Information on City of Kent waste reduction and recycling programs to Information on the Local Hazardous Waste Management Programs Event Participants These events are intended for the residents of Kent but will be open to King County residents and will be coordinated with county-sponsored events to avoid overlap of service. No flatbeds or large dump trucks allowed. OER reserves the right to refuse oversized, commercial, or contaminated loads. Event Promotion Event promotion will be accomplished in the following ways: • Distribution of a promotional flyer through direct mailings r Articles in the City newsletter publicizing events I ■ Publicizing the events through the King County Solid Waste Division • Publicizing the events on the City's cable channel and website Project Evaluation ` The following measures will be used to evaluate the completion and success of the events: i Number of vehicles attending • Volume of each material collected • Event cost by budget category Comparison of 2009 volumes and vehicles with prior year's events Timeline i I Tentative Event Dates--March and October, 2009 January/August 2009 j Event planning Work with City on finalizing event date Schedule vendor services February/September 2009 Schedule vendor services Work With City on event flyer Arrange for the printing, sorting, and mailing of flyer March/October 2009 Finalize planning Prepare site map Arrange event staff and volunteers Work with City on available City services Arrange event equipment Arrange event deliveries Mold event I April/November 2009 Prepare project reports Assist City in reimbursement process 2009 OER Scope of Work 17 City of Kent January 7, 2009 TASK 2: Business Recycling Program OER will promote participation in waste reduction, recycling, and recycled product procurement programs and increase the knowledge of recycling alternatives in the Kent commercial sector. Program Activities: 1) Kent Business Recycling Newsletter Prepare and coordinate distribution of Kent Business Recycling Newsletters to all Kent businesses. The newsletter will be sent to Kent businesses two or three times in 2009. 2) Kent Business Collection Event OER will implement one Business Recycling Event in 2009. The event will be held on a summer Wednesday or Thursday at a central location in Kent(Russell Road Park). Materials to be collected: ■ Clean Scrap Wood/Pallets • Refrigerators and Freezers+ • Scrap Metal • Electronic/Computer Equipment • Computer monitors++ • Fluorescent Lights • Office Recycla bles/Ca rd board • Toner Cartridges ■ Cell phones • Plastics • Paper Shredding • TV Sets++ +User fees apply ++User fees apply if the City decides to collect this material The following educational materials will be distributed at the event: ■ Information on City Recycling Programs • Educational Materials produced by King County Department of Natural Resources and Local Hazardous Waste Management Program of Other educational materials as appropriate Event Promotional Methods • Distributing a promotional lyer through direct mailings • Notices in City/community newsletters/and local newspapers (whenever possible) • Posting a notice at City Hall, on the City cable channel, and website (if available) • Publicizing the event through the King County Solid Waste Division Promotional Activities Event Participants This event is intended for the businesses in Kent. Some restrictions on the amount of material may apply. OER reserves the right to refuse contaminated loads. Event Evaluation • Number of vehicles attending • Volume of each material collected • Event cost by budget category 2009 OER Scope of Work 18 City of Kent January 7, 2009 i It Graphic or tabular comparison of 2009 volumes and vehicles with prior year's events i 3) Kent Business Assistance To provide business recycling assistance to Kent businesses, OER staff will send a Business Recycling Tool Kit to all new Kent businesses expressing interest in receiving it with an Introduction letter and offer of on-site visit. OER will provide assistance to City businesses on an on-call basis. OER will track assistance to City businesses as required by King County. OER staff will promote the website www,kentrecycles.com as a means to communicate with businesses and property managers regarding waste reduction and recycling, 4) Kent Business Recognition To provide Kent businesses with motivation to prevent waste and recycle, OER will manage the Kent Green Business of the Year Award. The purpose of the award/recognition program will be to acknowledge City businesses with strong commitments to waste reduction, recycling, and the use of recycled-content products. As feasible, OER will promote the winner's, and other outstanding applicants, programs as examples for other Kent businesses to model. 1 5) Business Website Assistance In 2009, OER will respond to Inquires from City businesses from visits to the City's recycling website. In addition, 4 all information and links posted to the site will be verified and updated as necessary. TASK 3: Multifamily Recycling Program OER will promote waste reduction and enhanced recycling programs through the following program efforts with multifamily residents and property owners and managers: • Distribute the City's brochure: Kent's Simple Guide to Recycling for Multifamily Residents multifamily educational brochures through direct mailings, special City events, and door-to-door delivery • Provide on-site waste consultations and follow-up assistance i • Respond to inquires from multifamily communities • Work with city-contracted haulers to cross-promote recycling information Project Goals and Objectives • Promote multifamily participation in Kent recycling services ■ Promote cost-effective handling of the multifamily waste stream • Promote the purchase of recycled products to the multifamily sector ■ Promote use of www.KentRecycles.com. 1 Protect Evaluation OER will monitor the success of the program by reporting the following: i • Number of educational materials distributed • Number of multifamily communities that received technical assistance • Increase In the number of multifamily buildings participating in collection service of recycables TASK 4: Spring Compost Bin and Rain Barrel Sale OER will organize a Spring Compost Bin Sale and, at the direction of the City, assist with the Spring Rain Barrel f Sale, OER will make all arrangements and enter into subcontracts with a backyard compost distribution vendor. OER will implement one backyard compost bin sale accompanied by educational outreach/technical assistance on backyard composting. The sale will be advertised in the Kent Spring Recycling Collection Event flyer sent to 2009 OER Scope of i 'ork 19 City of Kent January 7, 2009 all Kent households. At the event, OER will sell the compost bins for$15-$20 each and bill the remaining cost to the City. Each compost bin will include the educational manual, "Home Composting Made Easy" on grasscycling and backyard composting. TASK 5: Gram Administration OER will work with the City to provide grant administration and project reports for this Scope of Work. OER will: Track project expenses • Provide ongoing grant administration through the completion of the tasks, as outlined in this Scope of Work Prepare reports for the grant program • Prepare final reports as required by recycling program grants OER is available to implement additional projects at the direction of the City. ' 0 CD CD 0 C> C5 0, CD C� cp C; CD C> CD 0 C; ci Ln 0d. tf) Cl 6 r- 0 C4M YJ kn t,� It G kh CA C4 of h (q tq V) V9 b1 Vi 4n (1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . C) C> tD 5 0 R C, CD C C5 :, 0 o C> CD '0 ri 00 C; CD 0 0 C,, 0 0" 14 0 m 0' a in Z z 0 V) 69 a, V) Ch - - C.) CA (It 0 0 00) 0 0 0 0 CD (D 1= O C5 0 Q R R C! R R C> 0 q O tn in kn 'd m N 16 kn in in W V) N In w V! V) CO ro 0 0 0 C� C5 8 C, tn 0 a> 6 cs 6 "C> 'D -'r a, o w 00 ai CS a, V) ct 0 0 M 0 Op a IR 0 0 0 O R IR 0 0 C> G.) V, 14 41 q9 vi O � ro �I tA o o w NN r 14 cc> 0 c> 0 m O 0 C> 0 IR C? IR C� C. 0 0 0 = 0 C,0 'o 0 0 6 6 Z3 1= -n I:D �o W co O. C5 ci C; 0 CP rj Iq in a' t- kn tV Ln m "t r4 6q w vi L6 V) 4, C, Hp bb to C3 a cn rz a o nv E C3 14 4> rz W C4 z ot: LA Vcn 4j 3 0 ao cdd uo I IWIF PO I Iml I ml Iml U) Kent City Council Meeting Date February 17, 2009 Category Consent Calendar - 6F 1. SUBJECT: SHOWARE CENTER - ADD TO PUBLIC FACILITY ORDINANCE - ADOPT 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Adopt Ordinance No. , which amends sections 9,02.210 and 9.02.230 of the Kent City Code to add the ShoWare Center as a public facility for enforcement purposes of the City's criminal code on the premises of the ShoWare Center. Included within the City's criminal code are two provisions, KCC 9.02.210 and KCC 9.02.230, that allow police officers to cite and/or arrest individuals who cause a disturbance at a public facility, and to prohibit that person's re-entry into the facility for a stated period of time. These code provisions were last updated in October 2002. Since that time, the City has constructed the ShoWare Center. Because the ShoWare Center is a new public facility, for purposes of clarity, it is appropriate to amend these code provisions to specifically identify the ShoWare Center along with the other named public facilities. 3. EXHIBITS: Ordinance 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Safety Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? N/A Revenue? N/A Currently in the Budget? Yes No 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: iCouncilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, amending sections 9.02.210 and 9.02.230 of the Kent City Code to add the ShoWare Center as a public facility for enforcement purposes of the City's criminal code on the premises of the ShoWare Center. RECITALS A. Chapter 9.02 of the Kent City Code sets forth the City's criminal code, which is enforced by Kent police officers. Included within this criminal code are two provisions, KCC 9.02.210 and KCC 9.02.230, that allow police officers to cite and/or arrest individuals who cause a disturbance at a public facility, and to prohibit that person's re-entry into the facility for a stated period of time. B. These code provisions were last updated in October 2002. However, since that time, the City has constructed the ShoWare Center. The ShoWare Center is a public facility owned by the City of Kent, operated by SMG, and leased to the Seattle Thunderbirds and other performers and entertainers. Because the ShoWare Center is a public facility, Kent police officers currently possess the authority to enforce KCC 9.02.210 and KCC 9.02.230 on the ShoWare Center's premises. However, for clarity purposes, it is appropriate to amend these code provisions to 1 Update Criminal Code to Add ShoWare Center as a Public Facility specifically identify the ShoWare Center along with the other named public facilities. I I NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: ORDINANCE i SECTION 1. - Amendment. Section 9.02.210 of the Kent City Code, entitled "Disruption of Public Facilities," is amended as follows: i Sec. 9.02.210. Disruption of Public Facilities. A. A person is guilty of disruption of a public facility if he or she enters or remains in a public facility and: 1. Intentionally interferes with the proper functioning of the public facility by causing a substantial disruption of the public facility or the ` activities occurring at the public facility; or 2. Intentionally interferes with the use of the public facility by other members of the public and such interference is caused while the person is using the public facility in a manner other than that for which the public facility was intended. i B. As used in this section, the term public facility shall include, but not be limited to, the facilities commonly referred to as the Kent Commons, the Kent Resource Center, the Kent Senior Activity Center, the Riverbend Golf Complex, the Kent Library, Kent City Hall, the Centennial Center, the Kent Municipal Court, the Kent Corrections Facility, the ShoWare Center located at 625 W. James Street, and any other building, structure, equipment, and adjoining grounds and appurtenances of city, county, state, and federal government offices. i C. A violation of this section is a misdemeanor. i 2 Update Criminal Code to Add ShoWare Center as a Public Facility i SECTION 2. - Amendment. Section 9.02.230 of the Kent City Code, entitled "Public Facility—Criminal Activity—Prohibition of Entry," is amended as follows: Sec. 9.02.230 Public facility—Criminal activity—Prohibition of entry. A. The City Council finds that, from time to time, the right of the general public to enjoy public facilities provided by the City is infringed upon by persons who engage in criminal conduct at the public facilities or who possess and consume alcohol at the public facilities. The City Council further finds that the right of persons who engage in criminal activity at public facilities is outweighed by the right of law abiding citizens to use such facilities without the interference or fear of the criminal activity of others. B. Whenever a police officer or a judge, commissioner, or judge pro tempore of the Kent Municipal Court has probable cause to believe that a person has committed any act set forth in subsection (D) of this section on any public facility as described in subsection (E) of this section, that person may be given a written order prohibiting that person from entering the public facility where the act was committed. When issued by a police officer, the order shall remain effective for forty-five (45) days; provided, that in the event the person is charged with a crime or infraction that gives rise to the issuance of such order, the order shall remain effective until the person is arraigned for such charge or appears for a hearing for such infraction. In the event the person is charged with a crime or infraction that gives rise to the issuance of the prohibition of entry, the judge, commissioner, or judge pro tempore shall, upon finding probable cause, issue, reissue, or extend the order that shall remain effective for the period in which the court retains jurisdiction over the matter. 3 Update Criminal Code to Add Sho Ware Center as a Public Facility f f C. Whenever a police officer has probable cause to believe that a person is on or has entered a public facility and such person is prohibited from being on or entering the public facility pursuant to this section, the I officer may arrest the person for violating the prohibition of entry. i D. An act which may result in the issuance of a written order prohibiting a person from entering a public facility may consist of any of j the following when committed on the public facility: 1. Any act that qualifies as a felony crime; 2. Any act that qualifies as a gross misdemeanor or misdemeanor crime, excluding all traffic offenses except for violations of RCW 46.61.500, 46.61.502, 46.61.503, 46.61.5041 46.61.525; 3. Any act that qualifies as a violation of RCW 66.44.100; 4. Any act that involves entering an area designated in subsection (E) of this section after the area is closed to the public. E. For the purpose of this section, a public facility consists of the f buildings, structures, and equipment, and the adjoining grounds and appurtenances of any of the following: i 1. Any park maintained by the City of Kent, the County of King, or the state of Washington. 2. Any recreational area maintained by the City of Kent, the County of King, or the State of Washington, including but not limited to any skateboard park, the Kent Commons, the Kent Senior Activity Center, the Kent Resource Center, the Riverbend Golf Complex, the Green River Trail, and the Interurban Trail. 3. The City's ShoWare Center, located at 625 W. James Street. 4-3. The bodies of water known as Lake Meridian and Lake i Fenwick and associated boat ramps and areas of ingress and egress. 54. Any public school maintained by the City of Kent, the County of King, or the State of Washington. 4 Update Criminal Code to Add Sho Ware Center as a Public Facility i 6§. Any public library maintained by the City of Kent, the County of King, or the State of Washington. F. In the event that no criminal charges are filed as a result of the activity that leads to the police officer's issuance of the order prohibiting entry, the person prohibited from entering the public facility may request to have the order removed prior to the expiration of the forty-five (45) day period. Such request shall be filed with the City's law department. Such request shall contain a return address or contact information that will remain valid and be sufficient to enable the court to provide written notice of court dates. Within five (5) days of receipt of the request for hearing, the City's law department shall submit a request for hearing to the Kent Municipal Court. The court shall set a hearing to be held within ten (10) days of the date such request for hearing is received by the court from the City's law department. The City must establish that probable cause exists to believe that the person committed any act set forth in subsection (D) of this section. Proof of probable cause may be established based upon the sworn declaration incorporated by reference in a police officer's report that substantially conforms to the requirements of RCW 9A.72.085 without further evidentiary foundation. The sworn declaration may be supplemented by the testimony of witnesses and the presentation of other evidence. The person against whom the order was issued shall have the opportunity to present evidence and testimony when challenging the order. G. A person who violates any prohibition of entry issued pursuant to this section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. SECTION 3. - Severability. If any one or more section, subsections, or sentences of this ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect. 5 Update Criminal Code to Add Sho Ware Center as a Public Facility I SECTION 4. - Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and 1 be in force thirty (30) days from and after its passage as provided by law. I SUZETTE COOKE, MAYOR i ATTEST: i BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: I TOM BRUBAKER, CITY ATTORNEY i PASSED: day of February, 2009. APPROVED: day of February, 2009. PUBLISHED: day of February, 2009. I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No. passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the City of Kent as hereon indicated. I (SEAL) BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK P:\Civil\Ordinance\CriminalCodePublicFacilities-AddShoWareCenter.doc i I 6 Update Criminal Code to Add Sho Ware Center as a Public Facility Kent City Council Meeting Date February 17, 2009 Category Consent Calendar - 6G ' 1. SUBJECT: PROHIBITION OF RETAIL SALE OF NOVELTY LIGHTERS ORDINANCE - ADOPT 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Adopt Ordinance No. which bans the retail sale of novelty lighters within the City of Kent. The Kent Fire Department recommends that the City of Kent ban novelty lighter sales within the city limits. The Law Department has drafted a proposed ordinance based on current bills pending in the state legislature. If adopted, enforcement of this ordinance would be stayed for a period of ninety (90) days after the ordinance effective date in order to allow local businesses to deplete their current stock. 3. EXHIBITS: Ordinance 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Safety Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) ' 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? N/A Revenue? N/A Currently in the Budget? Yes No 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: ' Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds rDISCUSSION: ACTION: ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, amending Title 13 of the Kent City Code to add a new chapter 13.04, entitled "Novelty Lighters," which prohibits the retail sale of novelty lighters within the city limits of Kent. RECITALS A. Youth fire setting has been identified as a fast growing fire threat in the United States. Matches and lighters are involved in two out of every three fires sets by youths. Adding to this trend are novelty lighters that have features attractive to children because they include visual effects, flashing lights, musical sounds, and toy-like designs. Exhibit A, which is attached and incorporated, provides an example of novelty lighters that have been offered for sale, and page three of Exhibit A depicts actual lighters purchased within the City of Kent. B. The designs of novelty lighters are not critical to their function, and their use as lighters pose a public safety risk given their attractiveness to children. Since 1996, the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission has recalled hundreds of thousands of novelty lighters due to the danger posed to public safety. 1 Novelty Lighters - Prohibition On Retail Sales Within City Limits f C. Many public safety agencies support the retail sale prohibition of novelty lighters including the National Fire Protection Association, the National Volunteer Fire Council, the Western Fire Chiefs Association, and the National Association of State Fire Marshals. D. The Kent City Council has determined that it is in the best interests of the citizens and residents of Kent that novelty lighters be restricted from sale to the public within the city limits of Kent. 1 NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: ORDINANCE SECTION 1. - Amendment. Title 13 of the Kent City Code is amended to adopt a new chapter 13.04, entitled "Novelty Lighters," as follows: CHAPTER 13.04 NOVELTY LIGHTERS f Sec. 13.04.010. Findings. The City Council finds that the sale of novelty lighters within the City of Kent poses a public safety risk because, given their toy-like designs, they are attractive to children. Because youth fire setting has been identified as a fast growing fire threat in the United States, the City Council finds that it is a reasonable exercise of its police i powers to prohibit the public sale of novelty lighters within the city limits. Sec. 13.04.020. Definitions. As used in this chapter, unless the I context or subject matter clearly requires otherwise, the words or phrases defined in this section shall have the indicated meanings. i 2 Novelty Lighters - Prohibition On Retail Sales Within City Limits i A. Fire code official means the chief of the City's fire department, or any person authorized by the fire chief or other designated authority charged with the administration and enforcement of the fire codes. B. Manufacturer means any one of the following: 1. An entity that produces, or causes the production of, novelty lighters for sale outside the city limits of Kent; or 2. An importer or first purchaser of novelty lighters that intends to offer novelty lighters for resale outside the city limits of Kent. C. Novelty lighter means a lighter that can produce a flame using any fuel, including butane or liquid fuel. Novelty lighters have features that are attractive to children, including but not limited to visual effects, flashing lights, musical sounds, and toy-like designs. Novelty lighter does not include lighters that are only printed or decorated with logos, decals, artwork, or heat shrinkable sleeves. The term considers the shape of the lighter to be the most important characteristic when determining whether a lighter is considered a novelty lighter. Novelty lighters include, but are not limited to, lighters that are shaped like: 1. Cartoon characters; 2. Toys; 3. Musical instruments; 4. Vehicles; 5. The human body or parts of the human body; 6. Food or beverages; 7. Weaponry; 8. Furniture; 9. Sports equipment; 10. Holiday symbols; 11. Tools; or 3 Novelty Lighters - Prohibition On Retail Sales Within City Limits i i 12. Other equipment or household products including, but not limited to fire extinguishers, cell phones, vases, boots, shoes, toasters, traffic lights, light bulbs, pens, pencils, magic markers, coffee cups, fishing poles, money, propane tanks, gas cans, match sticks, cigarettes, clothing items, cameras, picture frames, or flowers. I I D. Retailer means a person who offers novelty lighters for sale to consumers within the City at retail through any means, but does not include a sale that is a wholesale transaction with a distributor or manufacturer, which does not involve the resale to consumers within the city limits. E. Sell or sale means to transfer, or agree to transfer, title or possession for a monetary or nonmonetary consideration. F. Wholesale dealer means an entity that distributes novelty lighters to a retailer or other person for resale to consumers. Sec. 13.04.030. Retail sale of novelty lighters-Prohibited. A. Within the city limits of Kent, a person may not: 1. Offer novelty lighters for retail sale to consumers; or 2. Give novelty lighters away to any person as a sample, prize, or gift for any promotional purpose. B. The prohibition proscribed by this section shall not apply to: 1. Manufacturers who produce novelty lighters within the City for sale to distributors or retail dealers for their subsequent resale outside the city limits of Kent; or 2. Distributors or wholesale dealers located within the City who receive in and distribute novelty lighters to retailers for subsequent resale outside the city limits. I 4 Novelty Lighters - Prohibition On Retail Sales Within City Limits I Sec. 13.04.040. Administration and enforcement. A. This chapter shall be enforced pursuant to the code enforcement process set forth in Ch. 1.04 KCC, as now enacted or hereafter amended. B. The obligation of complying with the requirements of this chapter shall fall upon any person defined under KCC 1.04.020(K) as a "person responsible for the violation." C. It shall be the duty of the fire code official, or his or her designee, to enforce the provisions of this chapter in the manner generally described in this chapter and in Ch. 1.04 KCC. The fire code official may call upon the police or other appropriate City department(s) to assist in enforcement. D. In case of conflict between the provisions of this chapter and Ch. 1.04 KCC, this chapter shall control. Sec. 13.04.050. Violation—Penalty. A violation of any provision of this chapter constitutes a civil violation under Ch. 1.04 KCC for which a monetary penalty may be assessed and abatement may be required and/or otherwise enforced as provided therein, or a misdemeanor pursuant to Ch. 1.04 KCC. Sec. 13.04.060. Grace period after enactment. On the effective date of this ordinance, March 19, 2009, retailers have a maximum of ninety (90) calendar days to eliminate their inventory of novelty lighters. In no instance may any retailer give away or sell a novelty lighter within the City of Kent after ninety (90) days from the effective date of this ordinance, or June 17, 2009. SECTION 2. - Severability. If any one or more section, subsections, or sentences of this ordinance are held to be unconstitutional 5 Novelty Lighters - Prohibition On Retail Sales Within City Limits i' c or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 3, - Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days from and after its passage as provided by law. i SUZETTE COOKE, MAYOR ATTEST: f BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK I APPROVED AS TO FORM: TOM BRUBAKER, CITY ATTORNEY PASSED: day of , 2009. I APPROVED: day of , 2009. k PUBLISHED: day of , 2009. I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No. passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the City of Kent as hereon indicated. i (SEAL) BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK P:\Civil\Ordina nce\NoveltyLighterSales.doc 6 Novelty Lighters - Prohibition On Retail Sales Within City Limits a. BIT _f _ i or?� s ! „s. , 7'� -E -2 w -�3 Lighters or toys? FIRE jAr Can you tell the difference? Could a Child? b�5T3I For more information about the dangers of novelty lighters, = contact us at 253-856-4481. KEN Used with permission from the 0regon office of the State Fire Marshal. � KE►�T XH �. . ,I i The pictures below look like toys but are actually lighters. � � I 4 j z 1 ' �hot AW Amoy g, 3 All watt too ON-- moo Nol �" - `c , r Kent City Council Meeting Date February 17, 2009 Category Consent Calendar - 6H 1. SUBJECT: BULLETPROOF VEST PROGRAM AWARD - ACCEPT 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Authorize the Kent Police Department to accept the Bureau of Justice Assistance Bulletproof Vest grant in an amount not to exceed $9,444.50. This federal program funds fifty percent of new and replacement bulletproof vest costs for police officers. The funding is available electronically on a reimburse- ment basis upon proof of purchase. 3. EXHIBITS: U.S. Department of Justice Award announcement t4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Safety Committee 12/2/08 (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? Revenue? X Currently in the Budget? Yes No X 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds ' DISCUSSION: ACTION: r-ly T V N W J) UF�� VT RUTLAND CITY At Large $ 2,484.50 10 VT SHELBUR E TOWN Al Large $ 1,691.50 8 VT SPRINGFIELD TOWN At Large $ 1,809.48 6 VT ST ALBANS CITY At Large $ 1,680.60 5 VT ST JOHNSBURY TOWN At Large $ 1,988.00 8 VT STOWE TOWN At Large $ 497.00 2 VT VERMONT At Large $ 1,910.95 60 VT WATERBURY VILLAGE At Large $ 1,242.50 5 Totals for VT(20 Jurlsdlctions); $ 36,604.91 196 WA ABERDEEN CITY 06 $ 7,544.00 23 WA ALGONA CITY 09 $ 1,971.99 5 WA ARLINGTON CITY 02 $ 1,700.00 4 WA AUBURN CITY 09 $ 5,234.45 13 WA Asolin City 05 $ 406.71 1 WA BELLEVUE CITY 08 $ 4,737.84 60 WA BELLINGHAM CITY 02 $ 13,476.38 30 WA BENTON COUNTY 04 $ 6,966.41 111 WA BURLINGTON CITY 02 $ 2,211,00 6 WA CAMAS CITY 03 $ 8,681.58 23 WA ICHEHALIS CITY 03 $ 2,821.71 7 WA CHELAN COUNTY 04 $ 14,264.77 38 WA CHENEY CITY 05 $ 2,287.60 6 WA CLARK COUNTY 03 $ 2,304.31 52 WA CLE ELUM CITY 04 $ 1,499.50 4 WA COLUMBIA COUNTY 06 $ 2,726.43 5 WA COLVILLE CITY 05 $ 2,657.53 6 WA COWLITZ COUNTY 03 $ 28,211.60 76 WA DES MOINES CITY 09 $ 6,896.65 18 WA DOUGLAS COUNTY 04 $ 3,220,39 10 WA DUVALL CITY 01,08 $ 3,698.50 8 WA EAST WENATCHEE CITY 04 $ 1,660.00 4 WA EATONVILLE TOWN 08,09 $ 712,50 2 WA JEDMONDS CITY 01 $ 7,187.21 12 WA ELLENSBURG CITY 04 $ 4,081.00 11 WA ELMA CITY 06 $ 1,063.99 3 WA EPHRATA CITY 04 $ 981.19 2 WA FEDERAL WAY CITY 09 $ 8,426.00 22 WA FIFE CITY 06,09 $ 6,760.00 14 WA FORKS CITY 06 $ 1.420,63 6 WA FRANKLIN COUNTY 04 $ 3.012.50 8 WA GARFIELD COUNTY 05 $ 2,617.54 6 WA GIG HARBOR CITY 06 $ 4,202,54 12 WA GRANT COUNTY 04 $ 8,824.87 27 WA GRAYS HARBOR COUNTY O6 $ 10,079.62 22 WA JHOQUIAM CITY 06 $ 2,476.08 8 WA ISLAND COUNTY 02 $ 2,026.68 20 WA ISSAQUAH CITY 08 $ 2,338.63 5 WA JEFFERSON COUNTY 06 $ 3,917.25 9 WA KALISPEL INDIAN COMMUNITY 06 $ 2,776.00 6 WA KELSO CITY 03 $ 1,777,82 6 ffWA KENT CITY 09 9 444,50 31 , • Y�?=���(;���� -� �--- �p� �� o'er� Kent City Council Meeting Date February 17, 2009 Category Consent Calendar - 6I 1. SUBJECT: HAZARDOUS MATERIALS RESPONSE PLAN - AUTHORIZE 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Authorize the Mayor to sign the Hazardous Materials Response Plan. The City of Kent Hazardous Materials Response Plan has been developed to implement hazardous material emergency preparedness responsibilities. The Plan details primary agencies, purpose, policy, authority, limitations, direction/control, functions, and responsibilities to ensure that a mutual understanding and a coordinated plan of action is implemented with appropriate agencies within the City of Kent. Washington State Emergency Management has reviewed and determined that this plan is within state guidelines. The City Attorney's office has reviewed this agreement. 1 3. EXHIBITS: Hazardous Materials Response Plan 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Staff & Public Safety Committee 2/10/09 (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? N/A Revenue? N/A Currently in the Budget? Yes No 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: I� I 1 i Fm 0 Hazardous Materials Response Plan fr "Aa (� �UtGEN\/ iz , M f f I� Mi r I I� KENT W A S H I N G T O N I I� I City of Kent Hazardous Materials Response Plan APPROVAL & IMPLEMENTATION Kent Emergency Management has developed the City of Kent Hazardous Materials Response Plan to implement hazardous material emergency preparedness responsibilities. The Plan details primary agency(ies), purpose, policy, authority, limitations, direction/control, functions, and responsibilities to ensure a mutual understanding and a coordinated plan of action is implemented with appropriate agencies within the City of Kent. The Mayor of the City of Kent directs each office, department, and agency to study the plan and prepare or update as needed a supporting plan to be implemented in the event of a hazardous material event. We have directed Kent Emergency Management as statutorily charged to make preparations to coordinate all response activities. The Chief Officer of the City of Kent Fire Department and the Emergency Manager are responsible for publishing and distributing this plan and will issue changes as required. Signature (Suzette Cooke, Mayor of Kent) Date Signature (Brian W. Felczak, LEPC Chairperson) Date If I TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Topic Page I. Purpose .................................................................................. 6 j II. Scope........................................................................................ 6 III. Policies and Legal Authority ................................................... 7 A. General......................................................................................................... 7 B. Federal......................................................................................................... 8 C. State............................................................................................................. 8 D. Local Ordinances........................................................................................ 8 i E. Local Agreements...................................................................................... 8 IV. Situation / Assumptions / Limitations .................................... 8 A. Situation..................................................................................................... 8 B. Assumptions............................................................................................... 10 C. Limitations................................................................................................... 11 V. Concept of Operations ............................................................. 11 A. Initial Conditions .................................................................................... 11 B. Incident Management ........................................................................... 12 VI. Responsibilities ....................................................................... 12 A. City of Kent ................................................................................................ 12 B. King County ............................................................................................... 15 C. State of Washington ................................................................................ 16 D. Federal Government ................................................................................ 17 E. Industry ...................................................................................................... 18 VII. Emergency Response Responsibilities ..................................... 18 A. Emergency Recognition ......................................................................... 18 B. Warning ..................................................................................................... 20 C. Direction and Control .............................................................................. 22 D. Public Information ................................................................................... 23 E. Personal Protection of Citizens .............................................................. 24 F. Evacuation.................................................................................................. 25 G. Resources ................................................................................................... 27 H. Responder Safety ..................................................................................... 31 I VIII. Communications ...................................................................... 31 A. Initial Notification to Response Agencies ............................................ 31 B. Radio ............................................................................................................ 31 C. Data .............................................................................................................. 33 D. Paging .......................................................................................................... 34 E. Cellular/other.............................................................................................. 34 Kent Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 - 2 - of52 Section Topic Page IX. Confinement/Contamination/Hazard Reduction ................... 35 A. Confinement ............................................................................................ 35 B. Containment ........................................................................................... 35 C. Hazard Reduction .................................................................................. 36 X. Clean Up/Documentation ........................................................ 36 A. Clean Up ................................................................................................... 36 B. Documentation ...................................................................................... 37 XI. Training & Exercising............................................................... 38 A. Training ........................................................................................................... 38 B. Exercising ...................................................................................................... 39 XII. Plan Update ........................................................................... 40 XIII. Facility Responsibilities........................................................... 40 XIV. Emergency Planning and Community Right To Know Act (EPCRA) Reporting ................................................................. 40 XV. References .............................................................................. 42 XVI. Acronyms and Definitions ....................................................... 42 A. Acronyms ................................................................................................ 42 B. Definitions ............................................................................................... 44 Appendix 1 Contact Information Appendix 2 Facility Responsibilities Appendix 3 State Statutes and Regulations Appendix 4 Distribution List Kent Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 - 3 - of52 i RECORD OF CHANGES City of Kent Hazardous Materials Response Plan Change # Date of Change Substance of-Chan a Entered B i i 1 i i i I Kent Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 - 4 - of52 City of Kent Hazardous Materials Response Plan Primary Agency(ies) Kent Emergency Management Kent Fire Department Support Agency(ies) Zone 3 Hazardous Material Teams City of Kent Police Department City of Kent Public Works Department King County Medic One Seattle King County Public Health King County Office of Emergency Management Washington State Patrol Washington State Department of Transportation Washington State Department of Ecology U.S. Department of Transportation, Coast Guard U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Mutual Aid Agencies King County Zone 3 Agencies Kent Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 - 5 - of52 i I. PURPOSE i A. The City of Kent Hazardous Materials Emergency Response Plan is the guide for coordinating all resources, public and private toward preparedness, response, recovery and mitigation efforts for hazardous material emergencies. These efforts may be utilized in a fixed facility or transportation related hazardous material emergency. B. The plan provides guidance for: hazardous materials incident notification and response, off-site emergency planning/notification procedures as required by SARA Title III of 1986, also know as the Emergency Planning & Community right -To-Know Act, which shall hereafter be referred to as EPCRA. C. This plan is designated to ensure the City of Kent has a means to minimize exposure to or damage from materials that could adversely impact human health and safety or the environment. This document outlines the roles, responsibilities, procedures, and organizational relationships of government agencies and private entities when responding to and recovering form a hazardous material event. D. A Hazardous Materials incident is identified as a potential hazard that may go beyond those considered `routine emergencies" and is considered an identified technological hazard. The complete Hazard Identification and Vulnerability Analysis (HIVA) can be found in the Kent Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan (CEMP). I II. SCOPE f A. While this plan is a part of Emergency Support Function #10 "Hazardous Materials" (ESF #10) of the City of Kent CEMP, it is intended to stand alone and be used independently from that document. B. To provide a basic plan for the City of Kent that will result in minimizing, to the j greatest degree possible, hazardous material emergencies and their possible effects on the community. To provide a basic plan to be used in conjunction with established facility plans, which may minimize the impact of a hazardous material release, associated with site-specific emergencies. C. To utilize present City Government structures and identify the responsibility of each City department during a hazardous material emergency. D. To recognize the responsibility in providing support to other Government agencies, as well as to request support and resources from other agencies when necessary. i E. To assure that all resources (public and private) are used effectively in mitigating a hazardous materials emergency. i i F. To remain consistent with County, State and Federal regulations and procedures. G. To establish procedures for providing direction, control and coordination of i Kent Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 - 6 - of52 1 I I emergency personnel and equipment in dealing with the type, magnitude and phase of the hazardous materials emergency. H. To provide for the dissemination of warning and evacuation information to all Department Heads, personnel of the City of Kent, and the general population in the City of Kent. I. To include a damage and risk assessment for decision making, direction, control and reporting purposes. J. To provide evacuation methodology used in the event of a hazardous materials emergency. K. To provide risk analysis for those types of hazardous material emergencies which pose the greatest threat to life, property and the environment in the City of Kent. L. This plan may also be used in conjunction with; ■ City of Kent Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan • City of Covington Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan • King County Emergency Management Plan Emergency Support Function #10 (ESF #10) Hazardous Materials Emergency Resource Plan. • King County Regional Disaster Plan • State and Federal Emergency Plans when the incident is of significant proportion to exhaust local resources. • South Puget Sound Fire Defense Plan • King County Fire Response Plan • Kent Fire Department Hazardous Materials Incident Manual III. POLICIES AND LEGAL AUTHORITY A. General 1. This Hazardous Material Emergency Plan is published consistent with the Superfund Amendment and Re-authorization Act of 1986, Public Law 99- 499; and the Revised Code of Washington, Title 38, Chapter 38.52.070 as revised, Washington Administrative Code, Chapter 118-40, RCW 34.04, Administrative Procedures Act, Law of Washington and Kent City Code 9.01. 2. The Mayor has designated the Chief of the Fire Department to be the Director of Emergency Management. The Mayor has further designated that a representative of the Fire Department will be the Incident Kent Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 - 7 - of52 i Commander when responding to Hazardous Material Incidents within the boundaries of the City of Kent. The Fire Commissioners of King County Fire District 37 have appointed the City of Kent Fire Chief/City of Kent Fire Department as the responding agency for Fire District 37. I B. Federal statutes and regulations: 1. 40 CFR Part 355; 370: US Code Title 42, Chapter 116 Section 11003 a-g & EPCRA Sections 301-312. r C. State statutes and regulations: (see appendix 3). 1. WAC Chapter 118-40 Hazardous Chemical Emergency Response Planning and Community Right-To-Know Reporting 2. Revise Code of Washington Title 70 i D. Local ordinances: 1. Kent City Code: Chapter 9.01 Emergency Services 2. Kent Resolution No. 1699, adoption of the National Incident I Management System (NIMS). E. Local agreements: 1. Valley Communications Interlocal Agreement 2. King County Regional Disaster Plan - Omnibus Agreement 3. King County Haz Mat Providers 4. Law Enforcement Interlocal Cooperative Agreement IV. SITUATION, ASSUMPTIONS & LIMITATIONS i A. Situation 1. The City of Kent is a rapidly developing urban area comprised of three main geographical areas. Two areas are located on the east and west hills and are primarily residential with community related commercial developments intermingled. The third area consists of the valley floor, which includes heavy commercial and industrial development as well as single and multi-family residential areas, and the core of City government. 2. Studies have been done in regard to the hazardous materials within the Kent area. A study done by the Puget Sound Council of Governments revealed that the City of Kent has the third largest concentration of hazardous materials in the Puget Sound area. Another study, done by the City of Kent Fire Department in 1986-87 identified specific locations Kent Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 - 8 - of52 i of these materials and further defined areas of potential risk. 3. The enactment by the Federal Government of the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act has assisted in identifying those facilities using "Extremely Hazardous Substances" which pose the greatest threat to the community. The most recent commodity flow study was done by King County in 1994 which identified 23 known UN numbers along with various miscellaneous and unknown substances. 4. Transportation routes for hazardous materials include: I-5, SR 167, SR 516, SR 515. Two railroad lines: Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) and Union Pacific (UP) transport hazardous materials north and south through the Kent valley. Additionally, there are two limited access roadways: East Valley Highway and West Valley Highway within the City of Kent which are considered prime areas for a transportation related hazardous material incident. These are the primary routes for distribution of hazardous materials to local facilities. 5. The Olympic Pipeline Company has a 14" Hazardous Liquid Pipeline that spans nearly 6 miles through the Kent valley. 6. The north valley area is considered heavy industry and it houses facilities that use hazardous materials in their business activities. There are over 100 Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-know (EPCRA) sites in the City (hazardous materials in excess of 10,000 pounds). Over 30 facilities have been identified as requiring "SARA" Planning. These facilities have above threshold planning quantities of "Extremely Hazardous Substances" as defined by SARA. 7. Hazardous materials spills might cause the short term or long term evacuation of an affected area. Depending on the nature of the spill and local weather conditions, residences, businesses, hospitals, schools, nursing homes, and roadways may be evacuated or closed to traffic until cleanup can be affected. When spills occur as part of an earthquake, this may compound the City's ability to move response resources and resume commerce. A Mass Casualty Incident resulting from a hazardous materials release would seriously impact the City's medical response community. 8. The Kent LEPC is responsible for providing assistance to the City of Kent in hazardous materials planning. The LEPC will issue a letter annually to the Washington State Emergency Response Commission (SERC) certifying the validity and currency of the plan and HazMat program. 9. The lead agency for initial response to a HazMat incident in the City of Kent is the Kent Fire Department. Emergency notifications for all HazMat incidents are reported through the Valley Communications Center which serves as the local Public Safety Answering Point (PSAP). 10. For incidents beyond initial capabilities additional resources can be summoned. Coordinating agencies in support include: Kent Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 - 9 - of52 I ZONE 3 I Valley Regional Fire Authority Kent Fire Renton Fire Federal Way Fire Tukwila Fire Port of Seattle Fire The Boeing Company Fire Department j ZONE 5 Seattle Fire Department ZONE 1 Eastside Hazmat Bellevue Fire Woodinville Fire Redmond Fire Bothell Fire Kirkland Fire Eastside Fire & Rescue 1 11. The Zone 3 and Kent Fire Department Hazardous Material Team responds to nearly 150 hazardous material incidents annually within the Kent response area. It is further known that many on site incidents are handled by facility workers and are never reported to local authorities. 12. Response measures and the need for evacuation would depend upon the amount, type of material released and the weather conditions. Evacuation processes can be found in the City of Kent Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan (CEMP). i B. Assumptions I 1. An accidental release of hazardous materials could pose a threat to the local population or environment. A hazardous materials incident may be caused by or occur during another emergency, such as flooding, a major fire, or earthquake. i 2. A major transportation hazardous materials incident may require the evacuation of citizens at any location within the City of Kent. 3. The length of time available to determine the scope and magnitude of a hazardous materials incident will impact protective action recommendations. 4. During the course of an incident, wind shifts and other changes in weather conditions may necessitate changes in protective action recommendations 5. If an evacuation is recommended be cause of an emergency, typically 80 percent of the population in an affected area will relocate voluntarily when advised to do so by local authorities. Some residents will leave by routes other than those designated by emergency personnel as evacuation routes. Some residents of unaffected areas may also evacuate spontaneously. People who evacuate may require shelter in a mass care facility. 6. More evacuation guidelines can be found in the Kent CEMP. Kent Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 - 10 - of52 I C. Limitations 1. Extreme weather conditions can cause a response delay; response can be delayed by location, storage and/or dispersal of appropriate response equipment; initial response may be affected by limitations to alert and warning systems in the community; or the incident may overwhelm staff and equipment. 2. It is neither implied nor should it be inferred that this plan guarantees a perfect emergency or disaster response will be practical or possible. No plan can shield individuals from all events. 3. While every reasonable effort will be made to respond to emergencies or disasters, resources and or systems may be overwhelmed. Some events provide little or no warning to implement operational procedures and all emergency plans are dependent upon tactical execution which may be imperfect. 4. This plan can only be fulfilled if the situation, information exchange, extent of actual capabilities and resources are available at the time of the incident. 5. Each agency, facility, and jurisdiction will respond within the limits of their training or actual capabilities and qualifications. V. CONCEPT OF OPERATIONS A. Initial Conditions 1. All jurisdictions, departments, and agencies will read and implement this plan, as appropriate 2. Regulate facilities will report chemical inventories to the State Emergency Response Commission (SERC), and Kent LEPC. 3. After notifying proper emergency response authorities a hazardous materials incident has occurred, the authorized representative of the regulated facilities and transportation companies will promptly notify the SERC. Continuing efforts shall be made to make recommendations to local emergency responders for containing the release and protecting the public and environment. 4. In the event of a hazardous materials incident, Kent Fire will determine appropriate protective action recommendations (PAR) for the public, disseminate such recommendations, and implement them. S. The Incident Commander has the authority to implement an imminent life safety evacuation and determine the PAR. 6. All responders will assist with the collection of information for identification of the party responsible for the hazardous materials Kent Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 - 11 - of52 f incident. B. Incident Management 1. To ensure a consistent approach for all agencies and jurisdiction to work effectively and efficiently together regardless of cause, size, or complexity the National Incident Management System (NIMS) has been adopted under Resolution NO. 1699 as the standardized incident management system to be used by all government agencies and disciplines in the event of an emergency in the City of Kent. 2. All response agencies will organize using the Incident Command System principles to include the use of: a) Command structure b) Common terminology c) Certifications (as developed) d) Pre-designated facilities and areas e) The Planning process f) Resource typing (as developed) g) Public Information VI. RESPONSIBILITIES j A. City of Kent 1. The Mayor is the executive head of the City and is responsible for direction and control to protect citizens during an emergency or disaster situation. 2. The City Council is the legislative body of the City. They are responsible for passing ordinances, resolutions and laws governing the City. i 3. Director of Emergency Management a) Plans for and coordinates emergency service activities carried out within the city before, during and after a hazardous material emergency or disaster. b) Acts as the coordinating agent for the government of the City to assure the best use of resources from the City, county, state and federal agencies as well as from the private sector. c) Advises and assists other departments of the City and appropriate organizations of the private sector in preparing a hazardous materials emergency plan pertinent to their function during a disaster. 4. Emergency Management I a) Develop and maintain internal operation manuals and guidelines supporting Emergency Management responsibilities. b) Maintains the KECC Resource Directory. Kent Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 - 12 - of52 c) Establishes, maintains and reviews mutual-aid and or private / public partnership agreements that support emergency or disaster operations. d) Provides coordination among local, County, State, Federal, private and volunteer organizations. e) Maintains the KECC equipment and functionality. f) Activates the KECC if requested and makes appropriate notifications. g) Prepares Emergency Proclamations for the Mayor. h) Provides for the identification and preservation of essential records as outlined in the records retention program developed and distributed through the City's Chief Administrative Officer. i) Produces and preserves essential records, reports and expenses associated with an emergency or disaster for possible reimbursement. j) Coordinates requests for emergency assistance. k) The Emergency Manager will serve as the Community Emergency Coordinator for Hazardous Material incidents. 5. Law Enforcement It is the responsibility of the Kent Police Department to provide effective coordination of the law enforcement agency during a hazardous material emergency through the following: a) Provide for effective traffic control and control of evacuation routes during a hazardous material emergency. b) Insure that law enforcement personnel are familiar with procedures for the identification and movement of essential personnel during a hazardous material emergency. c) Assist in the rapid dissemination of warning and evacuation information to the public as an augmentation segment of the established warning procedure, when necessary. d) Perform evacuation within parameters established for a specific incident action plan. e) Transport appropriate samples to the State Health Lab for testing. f) Participate in the Unified Command System. g) Participate in decontamination as necessary. h) Provide for self-protection monitoring and reporting of environmental and other hazards. i) Conduct drug lab related activities where hazardous materials may be found. j) Support investigation and evidence collection for terrorist activities. 6. Fire Service It is the responsibility of the Kent Fire Department to provide emergency response to hazardous material incidents within the City of Kent, Covington, and King County Fire District 37. The Kent Fire Department Kent Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 - 13 - of52 will act as Incident Commander (except on state and interstate highways where the Washington State Patrol will act as incident j commander during the incident), and effectively utilize all available City of Kent resources, as well as mutual aid manpower and equipment to save lives and property through the following: a) Provide coordination and control of personnel and equipment through the communications center and at a command post near the scene. b) Provide personnel and equipment for decontamination and emergency medical aid at the scene of a hazardous material incident. c) Provide personnel and equipment for control and containment of a hazardous material release or fire involving hazardous materials whenever possible. d) Act as the incident commander where identified by local ordinance. e) Assist with evacuation of populations affected by hazardous materials incidents. f) Contact the Seattle-King County Dept of Public Health when a I bio-terrorist incident is suspected. I g) Request initiation of EAS when appropriate. h) Request dispatch notification of local law enforcement and/or the FBI when necessary 7. Public Works 1 It is the responsibility of the City of Kent Public Works Department to provide effective coordination of the public works agency during a C hazardous material emergency through the following: a) Provide equipment and personnel to assist in the containment of a hazardous material release. b) Provide equipment and personnel to repair essential city facilities damaged as a result of a hazardous material release. c) Provide assistance to the Police Department in regards to traffic control on evacuation routes and at the incident scene. d) Provide mitigation measures for the protection of the city water and sewer systems. For equipment listings refer to the City of j Kent Public Works Operation Emergency Plan. 8. Health and Medical a) Ambulance Service • Ambulance service shall be provided by local ambulance services and fire department aid vehicles when appropriate. • Mutual aid services may be requested at the discretion of the Incident Commander, based on the scope of the incident. • These services shall be dispatched through Valley Communications at the request of the Incident Commander. b) Emergency Medical Treatment Kent Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 - 14 - of52 • On scene decontamination and emergency medical treatment shall be provided by fire department personnel and other available emergency medical personnel dispatched through Valley Communications as requested by the Incident Commander. • All persons requiring medical treatment shall be decontaminated to the extent possible, when necessary, prior to emergency medical treatment and transported to a hospital or other emergency facility. ■ Decontamination procedures are defined in the City of Kent Fire Department Emergency Response Guidelines for Hazardous Materials Incidents. c) Public Health • The Incident Commander, in cooperation with the Public Works Department, shall, to the best of their ability, take action to protect area water and sanitation resources form chemical contamination. Clean up and recovery from chemical contamination of the environment may require outside assistance form state or federal agencies, private contractors and consultants d) Other Health and Medical Assistance ■ Health and medical assistance beyond the capabilities of existing local resources and mutual aid participants shall be under the direction of the Director of the Seattle/King County Health Department, the State Department of Social and Health Services and/or the U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare as determined by the scope of the incident. B. King County 1. King County Executive is responsible for directing and controlling all county activities to protect lives and property from the effects of any disaster. 2. Director of Emergency Management is appointed by the King County Executive and is authorized to act in his/her behalf to coordinate with the state and federal government to mitigate the disaster satisfactorily. The King County Office of Emergency Management (OEM) will provide coordination with outside agencies and organizations involved in emergency planning and response; and manage the King County Emergency Coordination Center (KCECC) during activation and interact with outside agencies and organizations to coordinate emergency support activities. 3. General Responsibilities shall be as defined in the King County Emergency Management Plan Hazardous Material ESF 10. Kent Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 - 15 - of52 I I C. State of Washington I i 1. The Governor i a) Appoints an Emergency Management Council consisting of a maximum of 17 members. The Council advises the Govemorand the Director of the Military Department on matters pertaining to emergency management. b) The governor is legally responsible for directing and controlling all state activities to protect the lives and property of citizens from the effects of disasters. The governor may exercise the primary coordination role for implementing emergency preparedness measures, and is responsible for coordinating support from adjacent states and the federal government. ` 2. Military Department-Emergency Management Division a) The Emergency Management Division within the Washington State Military Department is responsible for coordinating operational support and resources from adjacent states and the ` federal government. Line agencies of state government departments are responsible for providing various services in support of state and local government emergency operations. The initial contact with Washington State is the State Emergency Operations Officer (SEOO). b) Organizes state and district emergency services organizations to ti insure capability of accomplishing emergency missions. I Coordinates all state and local emergency service organizations during declared emergencies as defined in the Washington State Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan. 3. The Washington State Department of Ecology a) Respond to the release of hazardous chemicals that may injure the environment. b) Act as the clean up coordinator for industrial chemical spills. c) Maintain Community Right to Know Tier II reports for the SERC. d) Review Section 313 reports and maintain files. e) Provide technical assistance to the Incident Commander and responsible party for chemical spills. f) Notify the US EPA of reportable spills. g) Provide a representative to the Emergency Coordination Center as requested. h) Participate as a member of the State Emergency Response Commission Activities 4. Washington State Military Department - Civil Support Team a) Deploy on direction of the Governor Assess sites through recon, sampling, on site lab testing. b) Evaluate suspected chemical, biological or nuclear threat. Kent Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 - 16 - of52 c) Provide decontamination and ALS medical support for the team only. d) Monitor and support local response. e) Coordinate with local, state and federal officials Operate within a Unified Command 5. Other State Agencies a) Responsibilities shall be as defined in the Washington State Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan. They shall be assigned emergency missions by the Military Department- Emergency Management Division based on their capabilities. D. Federal Government 1. FEMA - Region Ten a) Shall, under the guidance of the Department of Homeland Security and the National Headquarters, Federal Emergency Management Agency acting in concert with federal field establishments and the military; Interpret national policy and program direction, coordinate mobilization activities of Federal Field Offices and states to assure uniform application within the region, make emergency decisions on the use of resources and coordinate disaster relief activities of the Federal Government in accordance with applicable public laws, and coordinate the activities of other federal agencies. 2. US EPA a) The US Environmental Protection Agency is the incident command agency on inland waterways and will work within the unified command structure with the United States Coast Guard, responsible party, Washington State, Washington State Patrol, and local fire agency. b) The US EPA may provide technical assistance teams (START) contractors, On Scene Coordinators (OSCs) and limited cleanup funding where the responsible party is not identified or is unable to fund cleanup. c) Act as the Incident Commander for spills of hazardous materials or petroleum products occurring on inland waterways - when requested or when local agencies can not manage the incident. d) Provide site assessment assistance via the START contractor in the region Review annual SARA 313 reports Provide PIO support in conjunction with the Joint Information Center Provide a representative to the local or state Emergency Coordination Center as requested. Kent Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 - 17 - of52 'i III F. Industry l a) Provide for timely evacuation and site security for facilities affected by hazardous materials incidents. b) Provide for worker safety and shutdown of operations as needed during hazardous materials incidents. c) Provide timely public warning & notifications of hazardous releases from facilities. d) Provide information to media in concert with the Public Information Officer. e) Notify the Kent LEPC and NRC as may be required by law. f) Maintain and coordinate plans per law. g) Provide a representative to the Kent Emergency Coordination Center as requested VII. EMERGENCY RESPONSE RESPONSIBILITIES A. Emergency Recognition 1. Determining if a release has occurred adequate efforts and resources shall be utilized to identify the hazardous material. These resources may include, but are not limited to, the North American Emergency Response Guide Book, placard and warning labeling system(s) on individual containers, and behavioral characteristics of materials when released from their containers. 2. 911- The Valley Communications Dispatch Center shall attempt to extract available pertinent information from the reporting parties, which could prove helpful in the initial identification and protection of responders and the general public. 3. Evaluate Information Given at Time of Dispatch i a) Type of incident. b) Address, business name and general occupancy knowledge. c) Units responding. d) Short report from dispatch and/or MDT. e) Consult the North American Emergency Response Guide Book' when applicable. f) Consult site plan if available. 4. The first arriving units must conduct careful size up and assessment of the situation in order to provide protection for all individuals involved. It is always easier to decrease the size of the exclusion area than it is to increase the size after the initial perimeters have been established. Indications of Hazardous Materials include: a) Vapor, smoke, fire, liquid, and color. b) Types of containers. c) Placards, labels. d) Reaction of bystanders. Kent Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 - 18 - of52 e) Type of occupancy. f) Information from bystanders, employees, drivers. g) Way bills, bills of lading. h) Train consist, wheel reports. 5. If first due unit is responding to, or on location of an incident that is beyond the capabilities of First Responder"Operations Level", the officer should request the dispatch of E-76 and HM-76. On a hazardous materials response, these two units should always respond together. 6. When suspecting the presence of hazardous materials, the utmost importance should be placed on keeping emergency responders and the public out of the hazardous area. First arriving units should focus on that area which is in immediate danger and leave larger scale evacuations for later. a) Roads i. Seal off entry to the road, spill, or general area by blocking road with apparatus, cones, and other appropriate measures necessary. ii. Set up an Isolation Zone close to the spill. iii. Control access into areas between the roadblock and spill. iv. Address the Protective Action Zone. If applicable, evacuate down wind or shelter in place. b) Buildings i. Seal off building by controlling door access. ii. For multiple-story buildings, set up an Isolation Zone on the floor above and below the incident. If the building has multiple businesses situated to either side, remove the occupants of these businesses if the situation requires. iii. Address the Protective Action Zone. Evacuate the building and adjacent buildings if the situation warrants. c) Zones - Delineation of Hot, Warm and Cold zones must be made and that information communicated either electronically or verbally to all responding agencies and personnel. No response agency personnel shall violate the requirements for the entry into the various zones. Likewise, the general public should be kept in safe areas away from the response activities and parking areas. 7. Call type upgrades, dispatch response, and notifications will take place at Valley Com using established procedures. Emergency Management will be notified using Chief Tone pagers. 8. Identification of a material and its corresponding concentrations is an essential part of a hazardous materials response. When appropriate, technicians should use monitoring and test equipment to determine hazards. Detailed methods and capabilities can be found in the Emergency Response Guidelines for Hazardous Materials Incidents. Kent Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 - 19 - oF52 i B. Warning 1. Warning Systems - The City of Kent has no emergency warning system i (reverse 911, community sirens) in place designed to warn the community at large of a chemical or other type emergency. 2. Emergency Public Warning - The City of Kent, utilizing existing resources, will notify the public of an emergency situation to the best of its ability by one or more of the following methods: a) Emergency Alert System (EAS). NOAA all hazard weather radios which contain S.A.M.E. technology can also trigger EAS ' broadcasts. b) Through the Travelers Information Station (TIS) 1650 am radio. (This has a limited coverage area of mainly the valley floor) c) Through the established guidelines utilized by the Public Information Officer to notify the various media sources such as the Regional Public Information Network (RPIN) which allows anyone to sign onto the program to receive emergency notifications. ` d) Mainstream media such as radio, television, and city cable I channel, and website. e) Telephone contact of vulnerable populations and facilities as ! identified in site-specific plans. f) Public announcements through the use of public address systems on radio equipped city vehicles. g) Door to door notification. 3. The Emergency Alert System (EAS) is the replacement of the Emergency Broadcast System. EAS can rapidly disseminate emergency information to the general public at the request of Local, State, and Federal Officials. The Local EAS may be activated in response to emergency situations such as a hazardous materials release or any occurrence that poses a danger to life or property. Use of the EAS must be reserved for catastrophic situations when time is of the essence to prevent the loss of ` lives or property EAS Priorities as set forth in the FCC rules [11.44] are as follows: National EAS Messages Local Area EAS Messages State EAS Messages Messages from the National Information Center (NIC) (These are follow-up messages after a national EAS activation.) The FCC defines an emergency as a "situation posing an extraordinary threat to the safety of life and property." The following list is intended for guidance only and is not intended to be an exhaustive list. Some examples include: i a) Immediate weather situations: tornadoes, floods, severe thunderstorms, high winds, icing conditions, heavy snows, and widespread fires. Kent Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 - 20 - of52 � i b. Man-made or technological situations: nuclear attack or war, industrial explosions, discharge of toxic or flammable gases, release of chemical, biological or radioactive agents, terrorist attacks, widespread power failures, civil disorders, and dam failures. Criteria for local activation of the Emergency Alert System should be limited to an emergency event or situation which can answer YES to all three of the following statements: a) Lives are in immediate danger. b) EAS activation may save lives. c) A more effective method of warning is not available. The Incident Commander (IC) may determine that they have an incident which meets the criteria to initiate an Emergency Alert System Message in order to quickly disseminate critical information to the public about the emergency or disaster. The IC or his/her designee will: a) Collect all necessary information: i. Name of person requesting EAS message ii. Agency iii. Position iv. Name of the Incident Commander V. Contact Phone number and radio talkgroup vi. Type of incident vii. Timing of impacts viii. Geographic area affected (including city name, specific locations or neighborhood names: ensure all threatened areas are referenced). ix. Protective actions ordered by the Incident Commander. X. Area names, neighborhood names, or street boundaries identified by the IC where vulnerable populations are subject to protective actions. xi. Transportation routes or direction of travel for evacuees as identified by the IC. b) Contact the on-duty dispatch supervisor to request an EAS message be sent. i. EAS broadcasts are limited to 2 minutes. ii. No abbreviations or acronyms should be used. c) Valley Communications Supervisor will complete the "EAS Message Form" and forward via fax at #206-205-7956 to the primary origination point for all non-weather related EAS warning messages in King County which is the King County Sheriffs Office (KCSO) Communications Center. Confirmation that the fax was received will be made by telephone. Kent Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 - 21 - of52 �I d) If the EAS equipment in the KCSO Communications Center is non-functional secondary systems are located at: i i. Eastside Communications 24 hour Dispatch Center ii. Washington State EOC Tertiary systems are located at: i i. King County Emergency Coordination Center (M - F 0800-1600 only) ii. City of Seattle Emergent Operations Center 3. A list of 24 contact phone numbers, local institutions, and other key contacts can be found in appendix one to this document. C. Direction and Control 1. The City of Kent Fire Department has been appointed Incident Command Agency for hazardous material incidents within the City of Kent, except (upon State and Interstate roadways, where the Washington State j Patrol will assume the role of Incident Command upon arrival at the scene). 2. The City of Kent uses the Incident Command System, as referenced in the Department of Homeland Security National Incident Management System. The Incident Commander shall utilize the positions of the Incident Command System as deemed necessary at the time of the incident. 3. Upon the request of the Incident Commander, the Fire Department Operating Center (FIREDOC) will provide coordination between the Incident Commander and the various responding agencies. The Kent Emergency Coordination Center will activate to support the FIREDOC. and assist as needed. The Incident Commander shall determine if the incident has exhausted resources or capabilities of local agencies. 4. A unified command with a Federal On-Scene Commander (FOSC) from the Environmental Protection Agency and a State On-Scene Commander (SOSC) from the Department of Ecology will be initiated upon their arrival at the scene. Larger incidents in the Green River may call for the f United States Coast Guard to fold into the unified command structure for downstream mitigation. 1 5. The command post will be located in a safe area as near as practical to the incident scene. The Incident Commander may determine an alternate location more suitable to the type or size of the incident in progress. 6. The operations functions will remain at the incident scene regardless of the location of the command post. It will be the responsibility of the Incident Commander to request aid from outside agencies. Representatives from the following agencies may be located at the Kent Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 - 22 - of52 it command post: a) Kent Emergency Management b) Kent Police Department c) Kent Fire Department d) Kent Public Works Department - Operations Division e) Technical Advisors (as requested by the Incident Commander) f) Shippers (for transportation related incident) g) Facility Coordinator (for fixed facility incident) h) County Agencies (as requested) i) State Agencies (as requested) j) Federal Agencies (as requested) 7. The primary location for the Emergency Coordination Center will be at the City of Kent Headquarters/Fire and Police Training complex located at 24611 116 Ave S.E. The Mobile Command Post will serve as secondary ECC. Representatives of the following agencies may be located in the Emergency Coordination Center: a) Mayor b) Director of Emergency Management c) Emergency Management Coordinator d) City Council Members e) Public Information Officer f) Department Heads and/or their designee. g) Outside Agencies (health, schools, etc.) h) Volunteer Services (Red Cross, Salvation Army, COAD, etc.) D. Public Information 1. The Public Information Officer shall act as liaison between the Incident Commander, the media, and the public during hazardous material emergency situations. 2. The PIO is part of a regional Joint Information System which operates under NIMS guidelines. 3. The Public Information Officer will provide media representatives with news releases providing incident information and warning of possible danger to the community. This information is provided so that the public will be made aware of any potential need for evacuation, sheltering in place, or other emergency procedures necessary to protect themselves in a chemical emergency. 3. All news releases will be cleared through the Incident Commander and Senior Fire Officer on location. 4. The Local Emergency Planning Committee shall provide public information to the community regarding hazardous materials emergency planning and preparedness at least once annually by one of the methods listed below. Kent Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 - 23 - of52 I Information regarding chemical emergency planning and/or preparedness may be released to the public by any of the following methods. i B. Public Information Programs C. Newspaper, radio, or television announcements D. City of Kent LEPC website E. Pamphlets (utility bill mailers or handouts at community events) F. City Line publication G. Facility specific training programs (schools, hospitals, public facilities etc.) H. Media coverage of training exercises. E. Personal Protection of Citizens I There are essentially two ways to protect the public from the effects of toxic gas or vapor discharges into the atmosphere. One of these methods is evacuation and involves relocation of threatened populations to shelters in safer areas. The other involves giving instructions to people to remain inside their homes or places of business until the danger passes. In other words, it involves telling people to"shelter- in-place"or use"In-Place Protection". The following are recommended action needed to shelter-in-place. 1. Close all doors to the outside and close and lock all windows (windows sometimes seal better when locked). Close curtains/drapes. 2. Building superintendents should set all ventilation systems to 100 percent recirculation so that no outside air is drawn into the structure. If not possible, shut off ventilation systems. 3. Turn off all heating systems. 4. Turn off all air-conditioners and switch inlets to the "closed" position. Seal any gaps around window type air-conditioners with tape and plastic sheeting, wax paper, wet towels or aluminum wrap. } 5. Turn off all exhaust fans in kitchens, bathrooms, etc. i 6. Close all fireplace dampers. 7. Close as many internal doors as possible. i 8. Use tape and plastic food wrapping, wax paper, or aluminum wrap to cover and seal bathroom exhaust fan grills, range vents, dryer vents, and other openings to the outside to the extent possible (including any j obvious gaps around external windows and doors). 9. If the gas or vapor is soluble or even partially soluble in water, hold a j wet cloth or handkerchief over your nose and mouth if the gases start to bother you. For a higher degree of protection, go into the bathroom, close the door, and turn on the shower in a strong spray to "wash" the Kent Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 j - 24 - of52 � air. Seal any openings to the outside of the bathroom is best as you can. Don't worry about running out of air to breathe. That is highly unlikely in normal homes and buildings. 10. If an explosion is possible outdoors — close drapes, curtains, and shades over windows. Stay away from external windows to prevent potential injury from flying glass. 11. Minimize the use of elevators. These tend to "pump" outdoor air in and out of a building as they travel up and down. 12. Tune into the Emergency Broadcast System on your ratio or television for further information and guidance. F. Evacuation 1. The Incident Commander, based upon the available information at the time of the incident may institute an evacuation. Such activities shall be coordinated with the respective law enforcement agencies to ensure a cohesive operation. 2. The Incident Commander shall attempt to have the local law enforcement agency identify an individual to be assigned as a liaison to the Command Post. This law enforcement liaison needs to have the authority to direct, as necessary, law enforcement units assigned to field operation during the incident. Additionally, firefighters and other response personnel may be utilized to accomplish this process. 3. At no time should individuals be exposed in an unprotected manner so as to endanger themselves or others. Evacuation responsibilities can be found the City of Kent CEMP under ESF#13 Public Safety, Law Enforcement and Security. 4. The ideal situation would be to evacuate people prior to there being any direct threat to them. A more practical view would be that the warning, in what ever form it takes, will be after the damage has been done and the need for evacuation is immediate. The following Levels for evacuation will be used: LEVEL 1 - Warning Affected areas are warned that current or projected threats from hazards associated with the approaching (fire, HazMat, flood, etc.) are severe. • This is time for preparation, precautionary movement of persons with special needs, mobile property and pets or livestock. • Ongoing updates will be needed as conditions change. Area T.V. and radio station should be asked to broadcast periodic updates. Kent Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 - 25 - of52 I i • If conditions worsen, every attempt will be made to re-contact those in the affected area. If absent from their home, residents should leave a note with their name and contact phone number in a door or window where it can be easily seen. i LEVEL 2 - Request Events dictate a good probability that hazards associated with the j approaching (fire, HAZMAT, flood, etc.) will severely limit our ability to provide emergency services protection. Dangerous conditions exist that may threaten residents or businesses. ■ Residents must prepare to leave at a moments notice. Fire and Law Enforcement personnel are working in this area to provide specific information about when to leave and the route(s) to take. • This may be the only notice you receive. Ongoing updates are necessary as conditions change. Area T.V. • g 9 p Y 9 and radio stations have been asked to broadcast periodic updates. LEVEL 3 - Order Current conditions present specific and immediate threat(s) to the life and safety of persons within this area. • You are ordered to immediately evacuate. Fire and Law Enforcement personnel are working in this area to provide specific information about when to leave and the route(s) to take. • If residents choose to ignore this order, they must understand that emergency services will not be available and there is a good chance we would be unable to rescue you. Volunteers will not be allowed to enter the area to provide assistance. i • You will be kept advised as conditions change. Area and radio stations have been asked to broadcast periodic updates. �f 5. Shelter locations for the evacuated population will be provided by the Parks Department with the assistance of American Red Cross as covered under ESF# 6 Mass Care, Housing and Human Services. Sheltering includes the feeding, medical care, disaster information, and bulk distribution of emergency items to the victims. 6. The following instructions shall be given to citizens when they are notified to evacuate. The volume of information may be reduced if the Incident Commander determines that the circumstances or warning methods to be used do not allow for effective communication of all Kent Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 - 26 - of52 i information. a) Gather what you and your family will need. Pack only what you will need for the estimated evacuation time. b) Turn off heating, ventilation and cooling systems and appliances. Leave the refrigerator on. c) Lock the house or building when you leave. Leave your name and a contact phone number on your door or in your window for later notification. d) Do not use the phone unless it is urgent. Keep any emergency calls very short. e) Take only one car and drive safely. Keep all windows and vents closed; turn on the radio for evacuation routes and up-to-date information. f) Carpool, if possible, to help reduce traffic congestion during the evacuation. If you do not have transportation, ride with a neighbor, friend or relative. g) Follow directions given by officials along evacuation routes. h) Do not return to evacuated area until notified by radio, television etc. G. Resources 1. The following guidelines may be used by the Incident Commander in determining required resources to control a hazardous material incident: Response Levels Response Level I. Potential Emergency Condition Description: An incident or threat of a release that can be controlled by City of Kent responders with advice from outside agencies. The incident is not an immediate threat to life or property. Evacuation or sheltering in place is limited to the immediate area or involved structure only. Notification to the following may be necessary. Contact: Kent Fire Department Kent Police Department Kent Public Works Department Zone 3 HazMat Team Washington State Department of Ecology Chemtrec (Transportation incident only) National Response Center (NRC) Kent Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 - 27 - of52 i i Response Level II. Limited Emergency Condition Description: An incident involving a greater hazard or potential for threat to life or property. May require limited sheltering in place or ; evacuation of surrounding area. Notification to the following may be necessary. Contact: All agencies in level 1 Kent Emergency Management King County Office of Emergency Management Washington State Patrol Response Level III. Full Emergency Condition Description: An incident that poses a severe hazard to life and property or covers a large area requiring large scale evacuation measures and/or I information on sheltering in place. The incident may require the resources of county, state, federal or private agencies. Notification to the following may be necessary. Contact: All agencies in level 1 & 2 Washington State Military Department- Emergency Management Division (SERC) Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) or United States Coast Guard (USCG) Department of Ecology 2. For a complete list of resource particulars including maintenance and suit information refer to the Emergency Response Guidelines for Hazardous Material Incidents. APPARATUS 760 (HM-76, HAZARDOUS MATERIALS RESPONSE VEHICLE) Included but not limited to: Monitoring Equipment i Mini Rae PID Ludlum 2241-2 APD 2000 Chemical agent M256A1 Radiological monitoring kit MSA Passport j RKI Eagle Sirius Multi Gas CSM Drager tubes I Other Monitoring Agencies Department of Ecology Metro United States Coast Guard Washington Natural Gas Kent Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 - 28 - of52 Testing Equipment Haz-Cat Kit Metro Kit (water testing) pH Paper Bio - Capture Oxidizer paper 20/20 Biocheck Guardian Test Strips Haz Mat ID (sens - IR) Reference Materials DOT Guide Book NIOSH Pocket Guide Sax Manual Haz-Chemical Desk Reference Farm Chemical Hand Book Metro Emergency Response Book AAR Haz-Mat Book Facility Response Plans Chris ManualACGIH Guide N.W. Pipeline Response Guide Compatibility Charts EPA Pesticide Book Guideline for Protective Clothing Clandestine Lab (WSP) Kent HMERP Tier II Facility notebook/site plans JM Field Guide Jane's Chem/Bio Handbook CAMEO - Laptop Computer with wireless internet capability Protective Clothing Tyvek Suits "B" non-encapsulated Paper Jump Suits Level "B" encapsulated suits Nomex Coveralls Trell Chem Gloves (flash, butyl, viton, silvershield, Kevlar, nitrile) Kappler Reflectors Neoprene Boots Bike Helmets S CBA with 1 Hour Bottles Plugging and Patching Equipment (See vehicle inventory) Decontamination Shower TVI non ambulatory/mass decon shower Decontamination Shelter Zumbro Monitoring Equipment MOBILE COMMAND POST Worktable Fire control room-interconnect Awning Computer Night lights Television Telephone interconnect-outside Printer Set Down White boards Intercom-inside-outside Outside VCR Awning/side Area Maps Telephone, cellular, Reg. Work area -Lighting Radio Radio battery chargers Kent Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 - 29 - of52 I i VHF - 800 MHz Mobile radios Heat A/C Generator with trailer Anticipated Staffing at Mobile Command Post General Emergency Condition Operations Liaison Fire Police i Public Works Expanded Emergency Conditions Incident Command Area Command Planning Logistics Liaison/Police Public Works Equipment Radios Telephone Generator trailer 3. Federal Radiological Resources _ �II Radiological Assistance Program (RAP) 1 (206) N-U-C-L-E-A-R (682-5327) These assets are available by request through Washington State Department of Health, Radiological Unit. Approval of the governor is not required. RAP Teams are trained and capable to assist states in monitoring and assessing a radiological incident. They respond with their j own instruments, radios, transportation and procedures. If Region 8 RAP l responders are not available, other Regions may be able to provide support. Estimated response time, 4 hours i I Atmospheric Release Advisory Capability (ARAC) ARAC provides real-time 3 dimensional atmospheric dispersion modeling of the probable spread of radioactive contamination. The plot can be delivered by fax to emergency centers. Estimated response time: 1 hour Aerial Measuring System (AMS) AMS provides information on radioactive materials in the air and deposited on the ground. A helicopter and/or airplane with sensitive radiation detectors collect and stores data onboard. The computer can generate a map. Estimated response time: 12 hours i Federal Radiological Monitoring and Assessment center (FRMAC) FRMAC provides technical radiological support, radiation detection and measurement equipment, communication support, portable labs, a data center and GIS capability. FRMAC is useful in large events. Advanced party can arrive in 6 hours. Full response in 24 hours. Radiation Emergency Assistance Center/Training Site (REAC/TS) Provides medical response for radiation victims. REAC/TS are on call 24 hours a day. is Nuclear Emergency Search Team (NEST) Provides technical radiological advice and assistance in evaluating or locating nuclear and explosive materials. Estimated response time: 6 Kent Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 - 30 - of52 i I i hours. Accident Response Group (ARG) Provides management resolution of accidents involving nuclear explosives that are currently in the custody of the department of Defense. Estimated response time: 6 hours H. Responder Safety 1. A Safety Officer will be assigned upon the declaration of a HazMat incident. The safety officer shall have authority to discontinue activities that are deemed unsafe and present an immediate threat to life in their professional opinion. The safety officer shall immediately, upon stopping operations, report to the incident commander the situation and possible remedies, which would allow the operation to continue. 2. The Safety Officer checklist along with medical exam requirements and team responsibilities can be found in the Emergency Response Guidelines for Hazardous Material Incidents X. COMMUNICATIONS A. Initial Notification of Response Agencies 1. 911 will be the telephone number used to notify all local emergency response personnel of an emergency situation within the coverage area of the Kent Fire Department. Notification of non-emergency concerns during business hours should be reported by calling the business number of the Kent Fire Department. (253) 856-4300. 2. Kent Emergency Management, under the direction of the Director of Emergency Management, will coordinate the notification to the appropriate agencies based on the nature and severity of the incident. B. Radio The Kent Fire and Police Departments are part of the King County Regional 800 MHz trunked radio system. The system currently uses analog audio and mobile data technology and is essentially configured as three subsystems that work through common network controlling equipment. Subsystems include the City of Seattle subsystem, the EPSCA (Eastside) subsystem, and the subsystem that was jointly developed by King County and Valley Communications Center. It is possible to implement talk-groups on the system which have seamless coverage over the entire county. The City of Kent resides in the Valley Communication Center subsystem and communicates with surrounding entities using the 800 MHz trunking system through a dialog of various functional talk-groups. 1. Fire response and incident management and operations are performed on the following talk-groups: Kent Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 - 31 - of52 �I i FIRE-1 FIRE-2 FIRE-3 FIRE-4 FIRE-5 FIRE-6 FIRE-7 OPS-1 OPS-2 OPS-3 2. Police response and tactical operations are performed on the following talk-groups: KENT KPD-TAC DESMOINS AUBURN APD-TAC RENTON RPD-TAC TUKWILA TPD-TAC FED WAY WPD-TAC ERT-1 ERT-2 ERT-3 ERT-4 i 3. Local talk-groups exist for communications with various Hospital and School Districts including: I VALLEY MED CENTER HARBORVIEW AUBURN HOSP. HIGHLINE HOSP. ST. FRANCIS ST. JOSEPH HOSP. EOC KENT S. D. TAHOMA S.D. j FEDWAY S.D. I 4. There also exist subsequent private and common talk-groups for intra I and inter-agency communications: KPD ADMIN KENT FIRE COV-CITY COV-GOV KENT-PS VCC-PS V-COMMON KENT CITY KENT CITY 2 KENT CITY 3 Z3 ADMIN KCEOC - COM i KCEOC-OPS KC EM Z1 KC EM Z3 I KC EM Z5 5. The City of Kent Emergency Management Division may activate the Emergency Coordination Center during disaster situations as directed by the Emergency Management Director and has the capability of mobilizing a citywide radio network consisting of the following talk- groups: } KENT-ECC ADMINDOC EMPLOYDOC FINANCEDOC ISDOC LEGALDOC PARKSDOC PLANDOC POLICEDOC PUBWKSDOC FIREDOC 6. The following talk-groups are primarily for use in large- scale mutual aid incidents involving strike team or task force deployment. The use of each talk-group is controlled by its parent dispatch agency, for example, j MA ZONE3 is controlled by Valley Comm, and MA ZONE5 is controlled by Seattle Fire Dispatch Center: PS OPS S2 PS OPS S1 IMS S IMS ALL MA POOL 1 MA POOL 2 MA ZONE 1 MA ZONE 2 MA ZONE 3 MA ZONE 4 MA ZONE 5 MA POSFD SPEC-OPS PS OPS N1 PS OPS N2 ALLGOV LOC-GOV SO. MA PC 1 MA PC2 i Kent Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 - 32 - of52 I 7. Also existing are conventional (talk-around) 800 talk-groups and repeated but not trunked 800 hailing frequencies: ST OPS1 ST OPS2 ST OPS3 ST OPS4 ST OPS5 ICALL ITAC-1 ITAC-2 ITAC-3 ITAC-4 MARS 8. In addition to the 800 MHz regional smartnet system all first line vehicles are equipped with VHF mobile radios. These are rarely used but maintained as a redundant system to provide backup to the county system and for special assignment communications for wild land/urban interface. The VHF frequency map includes: FREQUENCY NAME FREQUENCY FIRE 1 154.070 FIRE 2 154.445 FIRE 3 155.925 FIRE 4 154.250 OSCCR 156.135 REDNET 153.830 FREQUENCY NAME FREQUENCY KCFD #44 154.280 KENT CITY GOV. 156.000 KENT PD TAC 1 155.685 HEAR 155.340 C. Data All chief officers' vehicles, command vehicles, front line engines, aid cars, aerial, and selected reserve apparatus are equipped with Mobile Data Computers (MDC's) which are linked to the 911 center. These devices receive dispatch information from the 911 center, and are scaled down versions of a dispatch terminal. They display information received via 800 MHz demodulating into real time dispatch information which includes address, type of call, units responding, times, and personnel. In addition they also transmit "status messages" indicating to the 911 center that the unit is responding or on location or other routine yet vital information. The units are also capable of sending and receiving either broadcast messages to multiple units, or single unit messages in text form between any users or the user and the 911 center. These units also track the assignment of personnel and associate them with an apparatus and a radio identification number that assists 911 center and command staff in tracking personnel assigned to a unit for routine administrative purposes in addition to the more important location of a radio emergency button activation alarm. Kent Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 - 33 - of52 i D. Paging On duty personnel have available a standard VHF station specific pager (i.e. station 71) to receive emergency dispatches directly from Valley Communications center. City of Kent Fire Department personnel are also issued personal alphanumeric pagers via a third party paging service to receive and send intradepartmental information. When off duty, personnel are encouraged to carry their personal alphanumeric pagers in the event of callbacks of a general nature or group such as: Hazardous Materials Team members, Confined Space Rescue Truck Ops., Chief Officers, or any other specific need of personnel for staffing purposes. E. Cellular/other All first run engines and command staff, and the majority of day shift support personnel are provided department owned cellular phones. Phones have Direct Connect capabilities for enhanced operations. Emergency Management also has a satellite phone for additional communication needs. Communications during a hazardous material incident are, at best, difficult. The Boeing Company currently has the capability of communications on Fire Dispatch 1-7 and Operational talk-groups 1-3 in addition to MA Zone 2,3,5 and all I-TAC talk-groups. HAZMAT members use special bone microphones in conjunction with the 800 MHz radio for in- mask communications to enhance operations. The following guidelines are based on standard operating guidelines and are not intended to limit the use of any communications method or talk-group available at the time of the incident. 1. In order to ease operations, portable radios will be used at the incident scene. i 2. Fire talk-groups 2-7 will be used as directed by the Fire Operator at Valley Communications Center. i 3. Citywide talk-group FIREDOC, or KENTCITY will be designated as the direct tie between the Incident Commander and the Public Works Operations Center or Public Works field personnel. j 4. Law Enforcement Agencies may utilize a common talk-group so as to include surrounding agencies including LERN and/or MARS. 5. Communications between the Emergency Management Agencies may utilize the appropriate talk-group established by the Incident Commander. 6. The primary mode of communications for the Kent Fire Department is the 800 MHz system. 7. Internal Hazmat team communications can be found in the Emergency E Kent Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 - 34 - of52 I Response Guidelines for Hazardous Material Incidents. IX. CONFINEMENT/CONTAINMENT/HAZARD REDUCTION Release control through confinement/containment/reduction of a hazardous material spill or release is of vital concern to the citizens of Kent. The Kent Fire Department, being the agency responsible for the initial response, shall perform to the best of its ability, any necessary measures for the control of a hazardous material release. These efforts will focus on limiting the effects of a release on life, property and the environment. Additional procedures for containment of a hazardous materials release can be found in the Kent Fire Department Emergency Response Guidelines for Hazardous Materials Incidents. A. Confinement Confinement techniques are the actions necessary to confine a product release to a limited area. Actions generally occur remotely from the spill or leak site and; therefore, are considered a defensive control measure. As a general rule, confinement activities should begin prior to attempting any containment operations. Confinement includes: 1. Diversion - A Controlled movement of the material to an area where it will produce less harm. 2. Diking - Application of a barrier which prevents the passage of the material to an area where it will produce more harm. Dikes should be considered temporary remedies intended to buy time for more complicated tactics. 3. Retention - Temporary containment of the material in an area where it can be absorbed, neutralized, or relocated to permanent containers, such as a recovery drum or vac truck. 4. Damming - Constructing a dam in a stream or other flowing body of water. B. Containment Containment techniques are those actions necessary to keep the product inside of the container. Containment requires entering into the Hot Zone to control the leak or spill at the source and; therefore, are offensive in nature. Most offensive actions are considered Technician Level work. The exception is incidents involving common materials that First Responders possess sufficient knowledge of and have proper protection from. 1. Plugging/Patching - Stopping the release covering or filling the container breach. Pressure 2. Reduction - Cutting off the flow or bleeding off the pressure to a leaking component or container, or the controlled reduction of pressure in a Kent Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 - 35 - of52 i I non-leaking container. 3. Reposition Container - The physical movement of a container so that the product level is changed in relation to the location of breach. 4. Over pack - Placing a leaking container into a recovery container. S. Vacuum - Retrieval and storage of material into a container by vacuum. 6. Covering - Placing a cover over solid material that is subject to spread by wind. Also used for keeping rain from spreading a liquid. 7. Absorption/Adsorption - Confining a material by trapping it in or on another material ? C. Hazard Reduction Reduce the hazardous properties of a material by taking some form of aggressive action. Hazards of the incident are not eliminated just managed: 1. Dilution - Using water to reduce the concentration of a water-soluble hazardous material. 2. Vapor Dispersion - Using fire streams or blowers to move and dilute a cloud of vapor. i 3. Vapor Suppression - Apply foam to separate the material from ambient air. 4. Neutralization - Changing the pH of a corrosive material to a more neutral level. I X. CLEAN UP & DOCUMENTATION A. Clean up 1. The cleanup and disposal of a hazardous material release is the responsibility of the owner or transporter of the material. Title 4 RCW 4.24.314. Clean-up and disposal measures must be coordinated j between the responsible party and city/state/federal regulatory agencies or private clean-up and disposal contractors as determined by the nature and severity of the release. RCW Title 4 Civil Procedure 4.24.314 Person transporting hazardous materials -- Responsibility for incident clean-up -- Liability of person causing hazardous materials incident. Any person transporting hazardous materials shall clean up any hazardous materials incident that occurs during transportation, and shall take such additional action as may be reasonably necessary after Kent Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 - 36 - of52 consultation with the designated incident command agency in order to achieve compliance with all applicable federal and state laws and regulations. Any person responsible for causing the hazardous materials incident, other than operating employees of a transportation company, is liable to the state or any political subdivision thereof for extraordinary costs incurred by the state or the political subdivision in the course of protecting the public from actual or threatened harm resulting from the hazardous materials incident. "Extraordinary costs" as used in this section means those reasonable and necessary costs incurred by a governmental entity in the course of protecting life and property that exceed the normal and usual expenses anticipated for police and fire protection, emergency services, and public works. These shall include, but not be limited to, overtime for public employees, unusual fuel consumption requirements, any loss or damage to publicly owned equipment, and the purchase or lease of any special equipment or services required to protect the public during the hazardous materials incident. [1984 c 165 ❑ 3.] 2. The Hazardous Materials Response Team has the responsibility of notifying individuals, companies, departments, and agencies when the scope of an incident is beyond the responsibility/capability of the Fire Department, or when seeking assistance. 3. The Fire Department should take no financial responsibility for cleanup; responsibility should be between spiller, cleanup firm, and Department of Ecology (if the spiller is unknown). 4. Steps taken for when a responsible party is and is not known can be found in the Emergency Response Guidelines for Hazardous Material Incidents. 5. A list of clean up contractors can be found in Appendix One "Contact Information". B. Documentation 1. Incident reporting: WAFIRS hazardous material section shall be filled out when a release requires the response of the Hazardous Materials Response Team. First Responders may request that team members complete the WAFIRS on responses that the team was not first due. 2. Discretion should be used as it is important to have an accurate record of the incident. If the incident was beyond the typical everyday response the team should take the responsibility of completing the WAFIRS. Section 8 Narrative shall be filled out with a complete description of what happened, action taken, outcome, and who was contacted and took responsibility. In addition, a copy of the incident report shall be forwarded to the City of Kent Emergency Management Division. Kent Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 - 37 - of52 i 3. Every time a Firefighter at the Hazardous Materials Technician Level makes an entry, he/she shall ensure that a Medical Monitoring/Entry Record is filled out. The report shall be routed to Fire Administration for placement in individual personnel file. See the Appendix of this plan for an example. 4. Cost Tracking: a) Should be filled out when resources expended on call are excessive. b) Most appropriately used for responses caused by companies that do not have facilities in Kent. c) May be used for a Kent based company at the discretion of the Fire Chief. d) The Hazardous Materials Group Supervisor should ensure the accurate tracking of resources used on an incident. e) The completed form should be routed to Assistant Chief of Suppression. 5. Investigative follow-up shall be the responsibility of the individual and/or company responsible for the release and state or federal regulatory agencies per their standard operating guidelines, as appropriate for the specific incident. 6. Post Incident Analysis: a) Should be performed when incident was beyond typical everyday response or at the discretion of a Chief Officer. b) Should be done on incidents that went well and incidents that indicate a need for improvement. c) Should be conducted within 10 days of incident. XI. TRAINING & EXERCISING i A. Training 1. The Training Division of the Kent Fire Department shall act as coordinator and provide scheduling and record keeping for all hazardous I materials initial and refresher training. Training schedules and information are available through the Training Division. 2. A 24 hour shift Captain will be designated as shift training coordinator to advise the Training Division on the needs of the Haz Mat Team and seek out new training opportunities. i 3. It is intended that all first responding members of the Kent Fire Department and selected members of the Police and Public Works f Departments will be trained to the First Responder - "Awareness Level" as defined in 29 CFR 1910.120. First responding members of the Kent Fire Department in addition to all members of the Hazardous Materials Team will receive all or part of the additional training as defined in 29 Kent Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 - 38 - of52 CFR 1910.120. For a complete list of training requirements see the Emergency Response Guidelines for Hazardous Material Incidents. 4. The City of Kent may also utilize training resources available through: a) The National Fire Academy (Emmetsburg, MD.) b) Region 6 Homeland Security Council c) EPA Region X d) Zone 3 Haz Mat providers training group e) Washington State Military Department (Emergency Management Division) f) The National Center for Bio Medical Research and Training (LSU) g) Washington State Patrol h) FEMA Center for Domestic Preparedness (Anniston, AL.) i) EMRTC New Mexico Tech (Socorro, N.M.) j) Counter Terrorism Operations Support (Bechtel, NV.) k) Emergency Response Training Center (Pueblo, CO.) 1) Training which may become available from time to time through private agencies will be utilized and considered part of the regular training requirements. B. Exercising 1. "Exercising the plan" refers to all or part of the Hazardous Material Emergency Plan to ensure that all elements work in harmony. All or part of the organizations and agencies involved may be active participants in the exercising process. 2. After the exercise, an after exercise review by participants shall be held to identify any elements in the plan that need to be revised or updated. This process shall assure that operational concepts are sound and resources are adequately prepared to carry out necessary functions in a hazardous material emergency. 3. The Director of Emergency Management or his/her designee shall provide for and organize a minimum of one exercise annually. This exercise may be in the form of a tabletop exercise, drill, functional exercise, or full scale exercise. 4. The Kent Haz Mat Team also participates at the Zone 3 and county level through various training and exercise opportunities done on a quarterly basis. S. Annual LEPC drills are usually performed in the September - October timeframe. Facility solicitation, site surveys, and site selection is accomplished by April - May timeframe. Past 5 drills include: a) Philip Environmental - 2003 b) Foamex - 2004 c) Univar - 2005 d) Bakery Chef - 2006 e) Air Liquid - 2007 Kent Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 - 39 - of52 f) Univar - 2008 XII. PLAN UPDATE 1. The plan shall be updated annually or following each exercise of the plan. Following the post exercise evaluation, any necessary changes as i identified by the evaluating group of the basic plan shall be initiated. In addition to changes identified in the post exercise evaluation, all current information in regards to personnel assignments, emergency phone lists and resources shall be reviewed for accuracy and updated. 2. Plan changes and updates can be to the entire publication, or by publishing only those pages that have changed. 3. Changes to the plan will be coordinated through Kent Emergency Management and approved by the Local Emergency Planning Committee. XIII. FACILITY RESPONSIBILITIES Facility listing can be found in appendix 2. XIV. EPCRA REPORTING Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act of 1986 PL 99-499 (summary) Title III Subtitle A Emergency Planning and Notification Sec 301 Establishment of State Commissions, Planning Districts and Local Committees Governor shall establish the state commission, local emergency planning committees, process for distributing information to the public, within 6 months. The composition of the LEPCs is established: elected state and local officials; law enforcement; first aid, health; local environmental; hospital and transportation personnel; broadcast and print media; community groups and owners/operators of facilities subject to reporting. Procedures for public notification of committee activities, and provision for receiving and processing public requests for information. i Sec 302 Substances and Facilities Covered and Notification The list of Extremely Hazardous Substances is established, planning quantities and release quantities established. Formal notification by facilities of their inclusion under this title. Sec 303 Comprehensive Emergency Response Plans Each LEPC is required to have a plan by 1988 to identify at a minimum: resources, facilities subject to reports, transportation routes used by hazmat commerce, facilities subject to risk of exposure (like hospitals and utilities), procedures to be followed by owners and operators, and medical personnel, designation of community and facility coordinators, procedures for notification of releases methods used for determining releases and likely affected areas, a description of emergency equipment and personnel available in the community for response, evacuation plans, training Kent Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 - 40 - of52 programs for local response and medical personnel, schedules for exercise of the plan. Facilities shall provide information to the LEPC for planning as requested. The State Emergency Response Commission shall review each local plan. NRT-1 shall be followed for plan development. The plan shall be revised annually. Sec 304 Emergency Notifications Immediately upon release of a reportable quantity of an EHS, the LEPC, the SERC and the National Response Center shall be notified. Information shall include: the material released, the amount released, time and duration of the release, medium of the release, acute or chronic effects, precautions to take, name and phone number of the contact person. A written follow up is required as soon as practical to include: actions taken, health risks, medical advice regarding exposed individuals. Sec 305 Emergency Training and review of Emergency Procedures A report to congress regarding the nation's readiness to respond. Sec 313 Toxic Chemical Release Forms Facilities subject to this section shall report an accounting of their routine releases and materials usage during the prior year by July 1st of the following year. Subtitle B Sec 311 Material Safety Data Sheets Facilities under this title shall submit a list of MSDSs for materials reported under section 312 ONCE or when the list is amended. Lists are submitted to the LEPC. These will be made available to the public on request. Sec 312 Emergency and Hazardous Chemical Inventory Forms Annual submissions of hazardous materials inventory forms are due by March 1st for the previous calendar year. Washington State requires Tier Its only. These are to be submitted to the LEPC, local fire and the State Emergency Response Commission for threshold planning quantities. Information is made available to the public on request. Subtitle C Sec 321 Relationship to Other Laws Sec 322 Trade Secrets Facilities may request materials subject to reporting provisions of section 312 is withheld from the public based on trade secret provisions. The process is outlined for petition. Extremely few trade secrets are accepted. Sec 323 Provision of Information to Heath Professional, Doctors and N u rses Information provision to health professionals is required under this section before and during emergencies by owners and operators Sec 324 Public Availability of Plans, Datasheets, Form and Follow-up Notices The Plans, MSDSs, Tier II forms and follow-up notices will be made available to the public. Annual publication of the availability will be made in local newspapers Kent Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 - 41 - of52 Sec 325 Enforcement Identifies Class I and Class II Administrative Penalties, Judicial Assessment, Civil process, and Criminal Penalties (for Sec 304 violations) are specified Sec 326 Civil Actions Federal, State and Local civil suits, rights provisions and intervention XV. REFERENCES A. FEMA, Guide for All-Hazard Emergency Operations Planning (SLG-101) B. US Department of Transportation &Transport Canada, - Emergency Response Guidebook. C C. SARA Title III - Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act. D. City of Kent - Emergency Response Guidelines for Hazardous Materials Incidents E. Kent Fire Department Hazardous Materials Incident Manual F. City of Kent - Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan G. King County - Emergency Management Plan ESF#10. H. US Department of Homeland Security - National Incident Management System. I. Central Puget Sound Area Emergency Alert System Plan XVI. ACRONYMS AND DEFINITIONS A. Acronyms ACP Access Control Point ALS Advanced Life Support BIO Biological BLEVE Boiling Liquid Expanding Vapor Explosion BLS Basic Life Support BNSF Burlington Northern — Santa Fe Railroad CAA Clean Air Act CBRNE Chemical Biological Radioactive Nuclear Explosive CDC Center for Disease Control and Prevention— Atlanta CERCLA Comprehensive Emergency Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 CEMP Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan CHEMTREC Chemical Transportation Emergency Center CAMEO Computer Aided Management of Emerge c Operations COOP Continuity of Operations DECON Decontamination DEM Department of Emergency Management DHS Department of Homeland Security DOC Department Operating Center Kent Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 - 42 - of52 I DOE Department of Ecology DOT Department of Transportation DECON Decontamination DEM Department of Emergency Management DOE Department of Ecology DOT Department of Transportation EAS Emergency Alert System ECC Emergency Coordination Center EHS Extremely Hazardous Substance EMC Emergency Management Coordinator EMD Emergency Management Division EOC Emergency Operations Center EPA Environmental Protection Agency EPC Emergency Planning Committee - Kent EPZ Emergency Planning Zone ERG Emergency Response Guide FCC Federal Communications Commission FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency DOT Department of Transportation DECON Decontamination DEM Department of Emergency Management DOE Department of Ecology DOT Department of Transportation EAS Emergency Alert System EHS Extremely Hazardous Substance EMC Emergency Management Coordinator EMD Emergency Management Division EPA Environmental Protection Agency ERG Emergency Response Guide ESF Emergency Support Function FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency FOSC Federal On Scene Coordinator HazMat Hazardous Material HC Hazardous Chemical HIVA Hazard Identification and Vulnerability Assessment HAZWOPER SARA Title I HMERP Hazardous Material Emergency Response Plan - Kent IC Incident Commander ICS Incident Command System ICP Incident Command Post IDLH Immediately Dangerous to Life and Health IED Improvised Explosive Device JIC Joint Information Center KCMEJO King County Medical Examiner's Office KECC Kent Emergency Coordination Center KCSO King County Sheriff's Office LEPC Local Emergency Planning Committee MA Mutual Aid MDC Mobile Data Computer MHz Mega Hertz MSA Mine Safety Appliance MSDA Material Safety Data Sheet MSO Marine Safety Office of the U.S. Coast Guard NIC National Information Center Kent Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 - 43 - oF52 NIMS National Incident Management System NIOSH National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NRC National Response Center NRT National Response Team OEM Office of Emergency Management OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration PIO Public Information Officer PPE Personal Protective Equipment PSAP Public Service Answering Point 911 Rehab Rehabilitation i RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act RCW Revised Code of Washington RMP Risk Management Plan RPIN Regional Public Information Network RPOSC Responsible Party On Scene Coordinator SAME Specific Area Message Encoding Title III of the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of SARA 1986, also known as Emergency Planning &Community Right-to Know Act. SEOO State Emergency Operations Officer SERC State Emergency Response Commission SCBA Self Contained Breathing Apparatus SIP Shelter In Place SOSC State On Scene Coordinator SOG Standard Operating Guidelines SOP Standard Operating Procedures START Su erfund Technical Assessment and Response Team TIS Travelers Information Station USCG United States Coast Guard VHF Very High Frequency WAC Washington Administrative Code WAFIRS Washington Fire Incident Reporting System i B. Definitions Accident Site The location of an unexpected occurrence, failure, or loss, either at a regulated facility or along a transport route, resulting in a release of listed chemicals. Access Control Point Control points manned primarily by State or municipal police, I augmented as necessary by the National Guard, established around the perimeter of the plume exposure pathway EPZ on roads leading into it when it is evacuated, or when occupants are taking shelter, for the purpose of controlling access into the area.. ACP's can be established for emergency purposes other than radiation releases. Acute Effect Symptom of exposure to a hazardous material; normally, the result of a short-tern exposure which comes immediately after exposure to hazardous chemicals. Somatic effect of radiation (or other toxic substance) which is manifest in relatively short times (in a matter of minutes for extremely high doses, up to about a year for lesser doses). Acutely Toxic Chemicals that can cause both severe short-term and long- Chemicals term health effects after a single, brief exposure of short Kent Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 - 44 - of52 duration. These chemicals can cause damage to living tissue, impairment of the central nervous system and severe illness. In extreme cases, death can occur when ingested, inhaled, or absorbed through the skin. Advanced Life A service capable of delivering advanced skills performed by Support Emergency Medical Services (EMS) practitioners (e.g., intravenous [IV] fluids and drug administration). Airborne Release Release of any material or effluent into the air. Air Purifying Uses filter or sorbents to remove harmful substances form the Respirator air. Air Sampling The collection and analysis of air to detect and measure the presence of radioactive substances, particulate matter or chemical pollutants. A sampler is a device designed to collect these samples. Also called air monitoring. Air Supplied Provides breathable air from a source outside the contaminated Respirator zone. Alkali Any substance with a pH greater than 7.0 (neutral. The chemicals known as alkalis are corrosive. Alkaline The property of being an alkali; being caustic in nature. The opposite of acidic having a pH greater4 than 7.0 Alpha Particles Positively charged particles identical with the nuclei of helium atoms. They penetrate tissues to usually less than 0.1 mm (1/250 inch) but create dense ionization and heavy absorbed doses along these short tracks. It is the least penetrating of three common types of radiation (alpha, beta, gamma) emitted by radio active materials and be stopped by a sheet of paper. Ambient Surrounding. Ambient temperatures are temperatures of the surrounding area (e.g., air or water). Ambulance A ground vehicle providing patient transport capability. Anhydrous A chemical term meaning no water present. Asphyxiant A chemical vapor or gas that replaces oxygen in air and can death by suffocation. Background Level A typical or average level of a chemical in the environment. Background often refers to naturally or uncontaminated levels. Bacteria Single-cell organisms that multiply by cell division and can cause disease in humans, plants, or animals. Examples: anthrax cholera plague, and tularemia. Basic Life Support An ambulance service capable of delivering basic emergency interventions performed by Emergency Medical Services (EMS) practitioners trained and credentialed to do so (e.g., splinting, bandaging, oxygen administration). Beta Particles Electron ejected from the nuclei of atoms - - extremely tiny bits of matter traveling at nearly the speed of light. Beta radiations are normally stopped by thin shielding (i.e., aluminum foil heavy clothing, leather gloves, etc. Biological Agent Microorganisms or toxins from living organisms that have infectious or non-infectious properties, which produce lethal or serious effects in plants and animals. There are three different types of biological agents: bacteria viruses and toxins. Blister Agent A chemical agent also called a vesicant, which causes severe blistering, and burns to eyes, skin, and tissues of the respiratory tract. Exposure is through liquid or vapor contact. Also referred to as mustard agents. Kent Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 - 45 - of52 i Blood borne Microorganisms that can cause disease in other organisms or in Pathogens humans, animals, and plants. They may be bacteria, viruses, i or parasites and are found in sewage, in bodily fluids, in runoff form animal farms or rural areas populated with domestic and/or wild animals and in water used for swimming. j Buddy System Use of two or more people together for response. Typically used by the entry team and the back-up team. CAMEO Computer database storage retrieval of preplanning data for on-scene response use in HazMat incidents. CAS Number Chemical Abstracts Service of the American Chemical Society indexes and complies abstracts of worldwide literature providing a unique, standardized reference number for a articular chemical. Caustic Something that strongly irritates, burns, corrodes, or destroys living tissue. CERCLA Comprehensive Emergency Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended. Regarding hazardous substance releases into the environment and cleanup of abandon hazardous waste disposal sites. Chemical Agents Solids, liquids, or gases that have chemical properties that produce lethal or serious effect in plants and animals that come in 5 classes: Blister agents, Nerve Agents, Blood Agents, Choking Agents, and Irritating Agents. Chemical Name Scientific designation of a chemical in accordance with the nomenclature system developed by the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry or the Chemical Abstracts Service rules of nomenclature, or a name, which will clearly identify the chemical for the propose of conducing a hazard evaluation. CHEMTREC The Chemical Transportation Emergency Center (CHEMTREC) is a centralized toll-free telephone service providing advice on the nature of chemicals and steps to be taken in handling the early stages of transportation emergencies where hazardous chemicals are involved. Upon request, CHEMTREC may contact the shipper, or manufacturer of hazardous materials involved ' in the incident for additional, detailed information and appropriate follow-up action, including on-scene assistance when feasible. CHEM-TEL Provides emergency response organizations with a 24-hour phone response for chemical emergencies. CHEM-TEL is a private company listed in the Emergency Response Guidebook. i Choking Agent A chemical agent that causes physical injury to the lungs. Common examples are chlorine and phosgene. Chronic Exposure Low doses of repeated exposure or contact with a toxic j substance over long periods of time. Civil Authorities Elected or appointed official of Federal, State or local government Cold Zone The area outside the Warm Zone (contamination reduction area) that is free from contaminants. Collective Dose The sum of the dose equivalent of all individuals in an exposed Equivalent population. Collective dose equivalent is expressed in units of person-Rem. Command The act of directing, ordering and/or controlling resources by virtue of explicit legal, agency, or delegated authority. 1 Committed Effective The predicted total dose equivalent to a tissue or organ over a Kent Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 - 46 - of52 Dose Equivalent 50 year period after a known intake of a radionuclide into the body. It is expressed in units of rem. Community Official designated by the Local Emergency Planning Committee Emergency who makes determinations necessary to implement plans and Coordinator who received official emergency notification of releases. Concentration The amount of one substance dissolved or contained in a given amount of another. Confinement Control methods used to limit the physical area or size of a released material. Examples: dams, dikes, and absorption processes. Containment Barriers or other physical confinements or airborne or liquid material released or which could by released into the environment. Example: plugging and patching. Contamination A hazardous substance dispersed in materials or places where it is undesirable. The deposit and/or absorption of radioactive material, biological, chemical agents, on, and by, structures, areaspersonnel, or objects. Control Chemical or physical methods used to prevent or reduce the hazards associated with a material. Example: neutralizing an acid. Corrosive A chemical which causes visible destruction of or irreversible alterations in, living tissue by chemical action at the site of contact. Decontamination The removal of radioactive contaminants or other hazardous (DECON) materials from surfaces (e.g. skin) by measures such as cleaning and washing. Detection Recognition of the presence of radioactive or other hazardous materials through the use of either detection instruments or human sense. Detection instruments are designed for use when either human sense alone cannot recognize the presence of materials or recognition through human senses poses a hazard to the individual accomplishing the detection. Dosimeter A device to measure accumulated radiation dose. This could be film badge, thermo luminescent dosimeter or an electrostatic pocket dosimeter. Evacuation Organized, phases, and supervised dispersals of civilians from dangerous or potentially dangerous areas to safe areas. Explosive Any chemical compound or mixture of substances which when subjected to suitable ignition impulses or agents such as flame, spark, heat, impact, or friction will undergo chemical and physical transformation at speeds varying from extremely rapid to virtually instantaneous resulting in the sudden development of very high pressure in the surrounding medium. Extremely Hazardous These are substances designated as such by the EPA EHS Substances (EHS) inventories above certain threshold quantities must be reported to the Washington SERC, or TERC, and local fire department pursuant to Sections 302, 304, 311 and 312 of EPCRA. EHS releases which exceed certain quantities must be reported to the National Response Center, the SERCs, TERCs, LEPCs, and local fire departments that may be affected, pursuant to EPCRA Section 304. The EHS's and pertinent, reportable quantities are listed in 40 CFR 355 and EPA Consolidated List of Lists. Facility Fixed-site required to report under EPCRA Flammable Liquid Any liquid with a flash point below 100 degrees F 37.7c Fume An airborne particulate formed by the evaporation of solid Kent Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 - 47 - of 52 i materials. Gamma Rays Electromagnetic radiation comparable to light. They are similar to x-rays except for their origin. Although their intensity decreases exponentially with thickness of the absorbing material, they can travel hundreds of feet in air and penetrate completely though the body. Hazard Any situation that has potential for causing damage to life, propertyand/or the environment. Hazard analysis The use of a model or methodology to estimate the movement of hazardous materials at a concentration level of concern from an accident site, either at fixed site or on a transportation route to the surrounding area in order to determine which portions of a community may be affected by a release of such materials. Hazardous chemicals Chemicals, mixtures, and other chemical products determined I or substances by US Occupational Health and Safety Administration (OSHA) (HC/HS) regulations to pose a physical or health hazard. No specific list of chemicals exists, but the existence of a Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) for a substance indicates it may be reportable under EPCRA. Facilities that have 10,000-pounds or more of a hazardous substance on site at any one time are required to report chemical inventories annually to the SERC,TERC, LEPC, and local fire departments in accordance with EPCRA Section 312. Reporting information software and current LEPC contact information is available at www.ecy.wa.gov/epera i Hazardous Material A substance in a quantity or form posing an unreasonable risk f (HazMat) to health, safety, property, and/or environment when manufactured, stored, or transported in commerce. A substance which by its nature, containment, and reactivity has the capability for inflicting harm during an accidental occurrence, characterized as being toxic, corrosive, flammable, reactive, an irritant, or a strong sensitizer and thereby posing a threat to health and the environment when improperly managed. Hazardous materials include extremely hazardous and hazardous substances of oil and other petroleum products. Other toxic substances include some infectious agents, radiological materials and materials such as industrial solid waste substances Hazardous Substance Chemicals, chemical mixtures, and other products determined (HS) by US Occupational Health and Safety Administration (OSHA) regulations to pose a physical or health hazard. No specific list of chemicals or substance exists, but the existence of a Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) for a product or substance indicates it may be reportable under EPCRA regulations. Facilities that store 10,000 pounds or more of a HS at any time j are required to report chemical inventories annually to the SERC, or TERC, LEPC, and local fire department in accordance with EPCRA regulations. Reporting information, software, and current LEPC contact information is available at www.ecy.wa.gov/epera. Substances can also be designated as such by the EPA pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). HS releases above certain levels may need to be reported to the National Response Center and must be reported to the SERC, TERC, and local agencies pursuant to CERCLA Section 304 of EPCRA and Kent Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 - 48 - of52 related state regulations. Hot Zone The total exclusion area around the hazardous material incident; size of the "hot zone" will vary depending on the material involved. No entry is allowed except by personnel wearing special protective clothing. Hypergolic The property of instantaneous reaction when two or more chemical come in contact with each other. Immediately The maximum level to which a healthy workers can be exposed Dangerous to Life and for 30 minutes and escape without suffering irreversible health Health IDLH effects or escape-impairing symptoms. Impervious Unable to be penetrated (e.g. by a chemical Improvised Explosive Those devices places or fabricated in an improvised manner Devices (IED) incorporating destructive, lethal, noxious, pyrotechnic or incendiary chemicals, designed to destroy, disfigure, distract or harass. Incident Commander The individual responsible for the management of all incident operations. Incident Objectives Statements of guidance and direction necessary for the selection of appropriate strategies, and the tactical direction of resources. In-Place Sheltering Directing personnel to remain in a building or seek shelter in a building or structure, in lieu of, evacuation for protection from a life safety threat, i.e., vapor cloud or explosion. All air circulating devices should be shut off and windows wand doors closed. It is anticipated in-place sheltering will last a short time, no more than a few hours. Irradiation Exposure to radiation as in a nuclear reactor or fallout field. Label Any written, printed, or graphic material displayed on or affixed to containers of hazardous chemicals. Landline Communication systems that typically use physical wires or lines that travel over land to form their communication links. Level A Vapor A combination of fully encapsulated chemical vapor protective Protective Suit clothing and SCBA. Level B Liquid Splash A combination of encapsulated chemical splash (not vapor Protective Suitprotective) protective clothing and SCBA. Level C Air filtration mask with splash protection. Long-Term Exposure Exposure lasting more than four days. Mitigation Activities to alleviate the effects of a major disaster or emergency. Mixed Waste Waste containing both radioactive and hazardous components as defined by the Atomic energy Act and RCRA respectively. Monitoring The act of detecting the presence of ionizing radiation and the measurement thereof with radiation measuring instruments. The process of sampling and measuring certain environmental parameters on a rea10-time basis for spatial and time variations. National Response Interagency organization, operated by the US Coast Guard, Center (NRC) which receives reports when reportable quantities of dangerous goods, hazardous and/or extremely hazardous substances are spilled. After receiving notification of an incident, the NRC will immediately notify appropriate federal response agencies, which may activate the Regional Response Team or the National Response Team. NOAA Weather A mobile weather data collection and forecasting facility Kent Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 - 49 - of52 Station (including personnel) provided by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, which can be utilized within the incident area. National Response Organization of representatives from fourteen Federal agencies Team with responsibility for national planning and coordination of CERCLA objectives. Nerve Agent A substance that interferes with the central nervous system. Exposure is primarily through a contact with liquid (skin and eyes) and secondarily through inhalation of the vapor. Examples: sarin soman tabun and VX agent. Neutralization The chemical reaction in which an acid and a base are reacted, bringing the resulting solution to a pH of 7.0 (neutral). Occupational Safety A part of the Department of Labor that deals with safety and and Health Agency health issues in the work place. OSHA On-Scene The total area that may be impacted by the effects of a hazardous material incident. The on-scene area is divided into mutually exclusive on-site and off-site areas. On-Site Presence within the boundaries of the wok site. Oxidation The addition of oxygen, which breaks down organic waste or chemicals such as cyanides, phenols, or organic sulfur, compounds in sewage by bacterial and chemical means. Penetration A chemical's passage through an opening in a protective material. Permeation The passage of a chemical through a piece of clothing on a molecular level even if the material has no visible holes. Phenols Organic compounds that are byproducts of petroleum refining, tanning, and textile dye, and resin manufacturing. Plume A vapor cloud formation that has shape and buoyancy. The cloud may be colorless, tasteless, or odorless and may not be visible to the human eye Regional Response A mechanism in each of the ten standard Federal regions, Team (RRT) Alaska, and the Caribbean for planning, preparedness, and response activities related to oil discharges and hazardous substances releases. Established under CERCLA and operated under the NRT. Regulated facility A site where handling and transfer, processing, and/or storage of chemicals is performed. For the purposes of this document, regulated facilities (1) produce, use, or store EHS's in quantities which exceed threshold planning quantities or (2) store one or more HS in a quantity of 10,000 pounds or more at any one time. Facilities that meet either criterion must annually report their chemical inventories of such materials to the SERC, LEPCs, local fire department. When appropriate, the , tribe must be reporting to the Tribal Emergency Response Commission TERC Reportable Quantity The minimum quantity of hazardous substances released, discharged, or spilled that must be reported to federal, state, local and/or tribal authorities pursuant to statutes and EPCRA regulations Response Those activities and programs designed to address the immediate and short-term effects of the onset of an emergency or disaster. The efforts to minimize the risks by protecting the people, the environment and property. Risk Management Pursuant to Section 112r of the Clean Air Act (CAA), facilities Kent Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 - 50 - of52 Plan (RMP) that produce, process, distribute or store certain toxic and flammable substances are required to have a RMP that includes a hazard assessment, accident prevention program, and emergency response program. A summary of the RMP must be submitted to the EPA. RMP guidance is available at http://yosemite.epa.gov/oswer/ceppoweb. nsf/content/RMPS. htm. iShelter Facilities to house, feed, and care for persons evacuated from a risk area for periods of one to nine days. Sheltering-In-Place Same as In-place sheltering Specific Need Public groups, who require special transportation or protective Populations provisions due to institutional confinement, lack of trans ortation or physical or mental disability or challenges. Terrorism The unlawful use of force against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government5, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in the furtherance of political or social objectives. Threshold Planning The amount of Extremely hazardous substances present in a Quantity (TPQ) facility at any one time which when exceeded, subjects the facility to Emergency Planning notification SARA Title III). Threshold Reporting The amount of hazardous chemical present in a facility at any Quantity (TRQ) one time which when exceeded subjects the facility to the hazardous chemical reporting requirements of 40 CFR 370. Toxic substances Toxic substances are chemical or compounds which may present an unreasonable threat to human health and the environment. Human exposure to toxic substances can cause a variety of health effects including long-term adverse health effects. Certain facilities which have 10 or more full-time employees and manufacture, process or use a toxic substance in excess of threshold amounts during the calendar year are required to submit a Toxic Release Inventory Report annually to the US EPA and the Washington SERC. A current list of substances covered, reporting guidance, and software is 1 available at the US EPA TRI website at www.eps.gov/tri Trade Secret Any confidential formula, pattern, process, device, information or compilation of information that is used in an employer's business and that gives the employer an opportunity to obtain an advantage over competitors who do not know or use it. Vapor The gaseous phases of substances that are liquid or solid at atmospheric temperature and pressure e.g. steam. Vapor Density Measurement of the weight of vapor as compared with an equal volume of dry air: a figure of less than 1.0 indicates a vapor lighter than air which will rise. Vital Zone An area over which the airborne concentration of a chemical involved in an accidental release could reach a level of concern. Viruses The simplest type of microorganism, lacking a system for their own metabolism they depend on living cells to multiply and cannot live long outside a host. Examples: Ebola, Marburg, and Lassa Fever. Vulnerable Facilities Facilities which may be of particular concern during a HazMat incident because they: a. Are institutions with special populations that are particularly vulnerable or could require substantial assistance during an evacuation schools hospitals, nursing homes day Kent Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 - 51 - of52 care centers, jails), or b. Fulfill essential population support functions (power plants, water plants, the fire/police/EMS dispatch center), or c. Include large concentrations of people (shopping centers, recreation centers) Warm Zone The contamination control area immediately outside the 'shot" zone (between hot and cold zones) used as a staging area for entry into the hot zone. Decontamination is performed in this zone. Warning An advisory issued by a local, state, or federal agency advising citizens in a specific area of some hazard or risk and recommending some mitigation action such as evacuation. Kent Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 - 52 - of52 City of Kent Hazardous Material Response Plan Appendix Contact of r i EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE TELEPHONE National Response Center 1-800-424-8802 WA.`State Emergency Management Division (SERC) 1-800-258-5990 loth WMD-CST, Camp Murray (state SE®o) Kent Local Emergency Planning Committee 253-856-4440 City of Kent Mayor-Suzette Cooke 253-856-5700 Fire 911 Fire Chief-Jim Schneider 253-856-4300 Emergency Management Division 253-856-4440 Emergency Management Satellite Phone 887-778-3648 Police 911 Police Chief-Steve Strachan 253-856-5800 Public Works Director-Larry Blanchard 253-865-5500 Public Works N Engineering-Tim LaPorte 253-856-5515 Public Works N Operations-Don Millett 253-856-5670 King County Agencies King County Public Health 206-296-4600 King County Emergency Management 206-296-3830 Metro (Renton Sewage Treatment) 425-226-3680 ECC 206-296-3830 King County Police 206-296-3311 Seattle King County Public Health 206-296-4603 Puget Sound Clean Air Agency 1-800-552-3565 State Agencies Department of Ecology/NW Office 24hrs. 425-649-7000 Department of Transportation 206-440-4000 Environmental Protection Agency 1-800-424-4372 Washington State Patrol 425-455-7700 Department of Health/Radioactive Protection 206-682-5327 Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 Appendix One 1 of 4 i Outside Agencies Radiological Assistance Program (RAP) 1 (206) N-U-C-L-E-A-R (682-5327) U.S. Coast Guard 1-800-982-8813 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 206-764-6702 The Boeing Company 253-657-8657 i Williams Gas Pipeline West 1-800-972-7733 Olympic Pipeline 425-271-5320 Puget Sound Energy - Emergency 1-888-225-5773 Red Cross 206-323-2345 Regional Justice Center Commander 206-205-2102 Kent School District Administration 203-373-7000 National Weather Service 206-526-6087 Washington Poison Control Center 206-526-2121 CLEANUP CONTRACTORS Action Services 1-800-697-1000 Advanced Environmental Solutions 206-652-2323 Antifreeze Environmental/Tacoma (Disposal) 253-926-0580 Archer Construction 253-872-7222 Aqua Clean Jet-N-Vac 425-271-5459 Baker Tanks/Woodinville 425-487-6503 Best Parking Lot Cleaning 253-863-3330 Bravo Environmental 425-424-9000 Cecon Corp./Tacoma 253-272-8851 Davidson Macri Sweeping 425-391-9221 NRC Environmental 1-800-337-7455 253-767-0441 Occidental Chemical (Chlorine) 253-383-2661 Phillip Services (Disposal) 253-872-7859 } (North American Spill Response) 1-800-567-7455 RAILROADS Union Pacific 1-800-228-9948 j Burlington Northern 1-800-832-5452 • Seattle Dispatch 625-6246 or 939-1050 I MEDICAL American Medical Response (AMB) 206-444-4444 Auburn Hospital 253-833-7711 Children's Hospital 206-526-2222 Enumclaw Community Hospital 360-825-2505 Evergreen Hospital (Kirkland) 425-899-1703 Group Health Central (Seattle) 206-326-3101 Group Health Eastside (Redmond) 425-883-5117 Harbor view Hospital 206-731-8074 Highline Hospital 206-431-5314 Overlake Hospital (Bellevue) 425-688-5000 i Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 Appendix One 2 of 4 Providence Seattle 206-320-2111 Riverton (Burien) 206-248-4730 St. Francis Hospital (Federal Way) 253-952-7971 Swedish Ballard 206-781-6341 Swedish Seattle 206-386-2573 Tri-Med (AMB) 425-251-8077 University Medical Center (Seattle) 206-548-4000 Valley Medical Center (Renton) 206-575-2574 Veteran's Hospital (Seattle) 206-764-2600 Virginia Mason (Seattle) 206-583-6433 NEWS MEDIA TELEVISION RADIO KCTS 206-728-6463 KCPQ 206-674-1313 KING 206-448-5555 KIRO 206-728-7777 206-726-7000 KISW 206-285-7625 KJR 206-285-2295 KMTT 206-233-1037 KOMO 206-404-4000 206-404-3404 KPLU 206-922-1020 KSTW 253-572-4425 KUBE 206-285-2295 KVI 206-223-5700 Northwest Cable News 206-448-3600 National Public Radio NPR 253-535-8332 NEWSPAPER PHONE Puget Sound Business Journal 206-583-0701 South County Journal 253-872-6721 main:872-6600 Seattle Post Intelligencer 206-448-8030 main:448-8000 Seattle Times 206-464-2204 main:464-2111 Kent Reporter 253-437-6012 main:872-6600 Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 Appendix One 3 of 4 i I LOCAL AMERICAN RED CROSS SHELTERS (Projected locations) SCHOOLS West Hill Totem Jr. High 26630 401h So. 253-945-5100 Mountain View 22420 Military Road South 253-373-7488 Valley I Mill Creek Jr. High 620 No. Central 253-373-7446 Auburn High School 800 4th St. NE - Auburn 253-931-4880 i i East Hill Cedar Heights Jr. High 19640 Kent Kangley Rd. 253-373-7620 Kent Meridian High 10020 SE 256th 253-373-7405 Kentwood High 25800 164th SE 253-373-7680 Kentlake High 21404 SE 300th 253-373-4900 Mattson Jr. High 16400 SE 2515t 253-373-7670 I Sequoia Jr. High 11000 SE 2641h 253-373-7542 Tahoma High 18200 SE 2401h 425-413-6200 Tahoma Jr. High 24425 216th 425-413-5600 CITY OWNED Kent Memorial Park 850 Central Ave No. 253-856-5000 Kent Commons 525 4th Ave. No. 253-856-5000 Kent Senior Center 600 East Smith 253-856-5150 Resource Center 315 East Meeker 253-856-5030 CHURCHES Kent Lutheran 336 2cd Ave So. 253-852-2057 Church of the Nazarene 930 E. James 253-852-5144 Kent Covenant 12010 SE 240th 253-631-0222 is i I r J I I Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 Appendix One 4 of 4 For Official Use Only City of Kent Hazardous Material Response Plan Appendix Facility Responsibilities 1. The owner or operator of a facility shall meet all of the applicable requirements of EPCRA, or of rules adopted by the administrator to implement EPCRA, as now authorized or hereafter amended, including the planning, notification, reporting, access, and information availability requirements as specified by Sections 301, 302, 303, 304, 311, 312, 313, 324 of EPCRA. 2. Transportation companies like railroads, trucking firms and pipelines are not required to participate in the report of inventories in transportation under SARA Title III sec 312. 3. Facilities requiring Tier II reporting and planning include: _Facility Name I Physical Address City State Zip; Access Business Group LLC 17250 S 228th St Kent WA ( 98032 Apex Cold Storage 18220 S 212th St Kent WA 1 98032 Bakery Chef 16320S 190 Kent WA 98032 Ball Metal Beverage Container Corp. 127402 72 Ave S Kent WA 98032 Boeing Kent Benaroya 20651 84th Ave S Kent WA 1 98032 Boeing Kent Space Center 20403 68th Ave S jKentj WA 1 98032 Burlington Environmental Inc 120245 77 Ave S lKent WA 1 98032 Carquest Distribution Center I7812 S 186th PI [Kent[ WA 98032 City,of Kent Armstrong Springs 117975 SE 275 PI 'jKentj WA 98042 City of Kent Clark Springs Watershed 124875 Kent Kangley Rd jKentj WA 1 98042 City of Kent East Hill Well 24525 104th Ave SE ,Kent WA 1 98031 City of Kent Springs Watershed 28600 216 Ave SE Kent I I WA 1 98042 City of Kent Seven Oaks Well 11834 Kent Kangley Rd IKent I WA 1 98032 Continental Mills, Inc. 7851 S 192 St Kent WA 1 98032 Davis Wire Corporation 119411 ,80th Ave S IKent WA 1 98032 Dawn Food Products 8815 S 190th St___I Kent WA 1 98031 Enersys Inc_— _r20612 84th Ave S Kent WA 98032 Exotic Metals Forming Company F5 19635 78th 411 S 226th St (Kent WA � 98032 1Foamex Kent — �Ave S .Kent WA 98032 Food Services of America 118430 East Valley Hwy (Kent WA I 98032 Hytek Finishes 18127 S 216th St_ entl WA 1 98032 Kings Command Foods 17622 S 188th St Kent WA 98032 Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 Appendix Two 1 of 5 1 For Official Use Only i Facility Name Physical Address City State Zip Kraft Foods Global 119032 62 Ave S jKentj WA 1 98032 Leisure Supply 121017 77th Ave S Kent WA 98032 MCI - KENTWA 6906 S 204 St Kent WA 1 98032 MCI - SEA]WA 112001 SE 227 PI Kent FwA F98031 NAPA Distribution Center 8441 S 180th St KentFWA T 98035 Northstar Beverage Co, LLC 8462 S 190th Kent�WA 98031- _-- Oberto Sausage Co. 7060 S 268th St jKentj WA 1 98032 Pacific Propeller Intl. LLC. r5802 S 228th St Kent I WA 98038 98032- Panasonic Industrial Company 76th Ave S1925 r14 Panasonic services r20421 84th Ave S Kent[WA 98032 Plush Pippin LLC 21331 88th PI S, Bldg F Kent _WA 98032 Protective Coatings, Inc. 11215 N 2nd Ave Rentj WA 980321 Puget Sound Energy- South King 6905 S 228th St Kent WnA 98032 Complex __ _— JQCM Company �930 Central Ave S Kent�WA �98032 jQala Systems Inc- Kent 119929 77th Ave S _jKentj WA 1 98032� Qwest Corporation - Kent Equipment 122828 68th Ave S Kent WA 98032 Qwest Corporation - Kent Meridian Co 114422 SE 260th St Kent WA 1 98042 Qwest Corporation - Kent O'Brien Co. 119640 68th Ave S Kentl WA 1 98032 Qwest Corporation - Kent Ulrich Co. 1206 S State Kent WA 98031 Rexam Beverage Can Company 1220 N 2nd Ave Kent[WA 98032 Sears #88709 17650 S 228th St Kent WA 98032 i Shaw industries, Inc. 122620 64th Ave S Kent I WA 1 98032 Truesoups I26401 79th Ave S [Kentj WA 1 98032 Univar 18201 S 212th St IKent I WA 1 98032 Washington Cold Storage, Inc. 1621 Railroad Ave N Kent WA 98032 Water District 111 Well #3 124814 148th Ave SE Kent WA 98042 Water District 111 Well #6 28110 132nd Ave SE jKentj WA 1 98042 Zep Manufacturing Company 21019 77th Ave S jKentj WA 1 98032 4. Facilities requiring Tier II reporting include: . ........ .__ Facility Name Physical Address City State Zip Air Liquide 18008 S 222nd St jKentj WA F98032 Airgas Dry Ice 1643 S 216 St IKent IWA 1 98032 i All American Metal 1926 5th Ave S IKent I WA 1 98032 American Steel, LLC. 119022 80 Ave S Kent WA 1 98032 Amerigas Propane 119244 E Valley Hwy jKentj WA 1 98032 Amerisource Bergen Drug Corp. 119220 64th Ave S IKent I WA 1 98032 BPB Gypsum, Inc 18655 S 187 St lKent I WA 1 98031 Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 Appendix Two 2 of 5 i For Official Use Only Facility Name Physical Address ICity State Zip' Budget Rent A Car System Inc 5701 122005 84th Ave S jKentj WA 1 98031 CB Toyota Lift 119305 7nnd Ave S jKentj WA 1 98032 Central Pre-Mix Concrete Products Co. 120609 77th Ave S jKentj WA 1 98032 Cingular Wireless 15834 S 196th St Kent I WA 1 98032 City of Kent 212th Street Tx Plant 19001 S 212 St jKentj WA 98031 City of Kent Garrison Well 19615 S 218th St Kent WA 98031 City of Kent O'Brien Well 122132 88th Ave S jKentj WA 98032 City of Kent Pump Station #5 123825 98th Ave S Kent WA T 98032 Dayton Richmond Concrete Acc. �17748 S 220th St IKent I WA 1 98032 Degussa Construction Chemical Ops Inc. 17240 S 227th PI IKent I WA 1 98032 �DiPietro Trucking Co. �18612 S 218th St IKent I WA 1 98031 Fed Ex Freight West 118221 E Valley Hwy IKent I WA 1 98032 Fields Company, LLC 1710 S Railroad Ave jKentj WA 98032 I Fluid Motion, LLC 125802 Pacific Hwy jKentj WA 1 98032 Forrest Paint Co. 11741 S Central Ave jKentj WA 98032 JGKN Aerospace Chem-tronics, Inc. 120231 72nd Ave S jKentj WA 1 98032 Hexcel Corporation 19819 84 Ave S Kent WA 98032 Holman Distribution Center 122430 76th Ave S IKent I WA 98032 Hydraulic Repair & Design, Inc 16942 S 196th St IKent I WA 1 98032 Interpiastic Corp. 122237 76th Ave S jKentj WA 11 98032 1 Kent Meridian Disposal 122010 76th Ave S Kent I WA 1 98032 Kerry Savory 121612 88th Ave S jKentj WA 1 98031 1 Lakeside Ind Kent 26010 180th Ave SE Covi WA 98042 ngto n LeDuc Transportation, Inc. 19929 77th Ave S Kent I WA 1 98032 Mikron Industries Inc 11034 6th Ave N IKent I WA 1 98032 Mikron Industries Inc 18921 S 187th St jKentj WA 98031 Modern Machinery 122431 83rd Ave S jKentj WA 1 98032 Motor Oil Supply Co. 11123 4th Ave N jKentj WA 1 98032 Mutual Materials - Kent Block Plant 17414 S 206th St jKentj WA 1 98032 (Mu�Materials - Kent Dist. Branch 17414 S 206th St jKentj WA 1 98032 Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P. 118441 E Valley Hwy jKentj WA 1 98032 Pliant Corporation 18039 S 192nd St jKentj WA 1 98032 Polyform U.S. Ltd. 17030 S 224th St jKentj WA 1 98032 jPozzi Bros. Transportation Inc. 121441 76th Ave S jKentj WA 98032 Premier Industries, Inc 119041 80th Ave S jKentj WA 1 98032 Puget Sound Energy Black Diamond Gate 31100 Kent-Black Kent WA 1 980092 Station Diamond Rd SE Relizon Company 118821 90th Ave S jKentj WA 1 98031 Reporter Newspapers 1600 Washington Ave S jKentj WA 1 98032 Rotary Offset Press 16600 S 231st St Kent I WA 98032 Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 Appendix Two 3 of 5 For Official Use Only j Facility Name Physical Address City State Zip', Royal Reprographics, Inc. 7825 S 180th St jKentj WA 1 98072 Scarsella Bros, Inc. 119440 84th Ave S jKentj WA 1 98032 Sealed Air Corporation 18030 S 228th St jKentj WA 98032 (Smith Brothers Farms 127411 68th Ave S lKent I WA 1 98032 Starbucks Coffee Co. 118411 77th PIS jKentj WA 1 98032 Sysco Food Service 122820 54th Ave S lKent I WA 1 98032 ITri-State Construction, Inc. 18615 S 192nd St lKent IA ' 98031 United Warehouse - #4 18610 S 212th St jKentj WA 1 98031 United Warehouse - #6 121112 72nd Ave S lKent I WA 1 98032 US Ink 16417 S 194 St IKent I WA 1 98032 Washington State Military Department - 24410 Military Road S Kent WA 98032 Kent Armory Water District 111 Main Office 127224 144th Ave SE IKent I WA 1 98032 Water District 111 Well #5 125319 128th Ave SE lKent I WA 1 98042 Water District 111 Well #9 127501 151st Ave SE IKent I WA ( 98042 Westport Supply Co, Inc. 122239 76th Ave S IKent I WA 1 98032 y WSDOT Environmental Kent 26620 68th Ave S Kent WA 98032 5. Notifications are the obligation of the party responsible for the materials) released. These notifications might be identified under federal, state or local codes. These might include but are not restricted to: Local 911, the US I Coast Guard, Washington State Department of Ecology, the National Response Center, Washington State Department of Transportation, the Emergency Management Division of the Washington State Military Department, Washington State Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Local Indian Tribes, Puget Sound Air Pollution Control, US Environmental Protection, local health departments and local utilities. 6. Sample facility checklist: Task Assigned Time Person Done • Identify the Hazard • Identify released material if possible • Isolate and/or evacuate • Call for assistance, give information requested • Notify as required by Law • Warn Employees and Impacted Populations • Use alarms stems available • Implement Emergency Shutdown Procedures i7l Establish Direction & Control • Establish an Action Plan - Establish Objectives • Account for Personnel • Attend to Injured as possible [7) Evaluate Resources Available and Needed Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 I Appendix Two 4 of 5 I For Official Use Only C] Establish Site Security 0 Evaluate Damages or Impact 171 Respond as appropriate with proper equipment and trained personnel [73 Establish Decontamination, Emergency Medical, Entry Team, Backup and Safety Officer, if needed O Monitor and constantly evaluate efforts • Establish Public Information Officer • Demobilize O Cleanup per law O Submit reports and evaluate incident CI Update Facility Procedures as needed Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 Appendix Two 5of5 I I I City of Kent Hazardous Material Response Plan j i Appendix State t t nd Regulatio I. WAC Chapter 118-40 Hazardous Chemical Emergency Response Planning and Community Right-To-Know Reporting 118-40-010 Introduction. 118-40-020 Purpose and scope. 118-40-030 Definitions. 118-40-040 State Emergency Response Commission--Establishment, membership, chairperson. 118-40-050 Commission--Purpose, responsibilities. 118-40-060 Military Department--EPCRA responsibilities. 118-40-070 Department of Ecology--EPCRA responsibilities. 118-40-080 Washington State Patrol--EPCRA responsibilities. 118-40-150 Emergency planning districts--Designation. 118-40-160 Local committee--Organization, membership. 118-40-170 Local committee--Responsibilities. 118-40-180 Hazardous material emergency response plan--Content, guidelines, evaluation process. 118-40-190 Emergency response training. 118-40-300 EPCRA--Facilities compliance. 118-40-400 EPCRA--Enforcement, penalties. WAC 118-40-010 INTRODUCTION On October 17, 1986, the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA) was signed into law (P.L. 99-499). The Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act of 1986 hereafter referred to as "EPCRA". EPCRA establishes requirements for federal, state, and local governments, and industry regarding emergency response planning as well as community right-to-know in regards to hazardous chemicals. The emergency planning provisions of EPCRA (Sections 301-305) are designed to develop state and local government hazardous chemical emergency preparedness and response capabilities through better coordination and planning, specifically at the local level. Other community right-to-know provisions require the owners and/or operators of facilities to provide information about the nature, quantity, and location of reportable chemicals manufactured, processed, stored, or used at their facility sites. The purpose of these provisions is to increase public knowledge of the presence of hazardous Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 Appendix Three 1 of 14 chemicals in communities and to better prepare for potential emergencies. WAC 118-40-020 PURPOSE AND SCOPE It is the purpose of this chapter to implement the provisions of EPCRA in the State of Washington to establish a mechanism for compliance by state and local governmental agencies and industry. This chapter is promulgated under the general policy and rule- making authority of the Military Department as established by RCW 38.52.030(2); 38.52.050 (1) and (3); and 43.63A.060. Compliance with the requirements of EPCRA, as recognized by the United States Environmental Protection Agency, is regarded as compliance with the provisions of this chapter. Where federal regulations are duplicated or referred to in this chapter, EPCRA citations are provided. This chapter is not intended to mandate any new compliance requirements beyond those required by EPCRA. WAC 118-40-030 DEFINITIONS "CERCLA" means the Comprehensive Emergency Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as adopted. "EMC" means the Emergency Management Council for Washington State. (RCW 38.52.040(l).) "Environment" includes water, air, and the land and the interrelationship, which exists among and between water, air, and the land and all living things. "EPCRA" means Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act of 1986 as adopted, which is synonymous with SARA Title III. "Extremely hazardous substances" means a substance described in Section 302(a) (2) of EPCRA as now authorized or hereafter adopted. "Facility" means all buildings, equipment, structures, and other stationary items which are located on a single site or on contiguous or adjacent sites and which are owned or operated by the same person (or by any person which controls, is controlled by, or under common control with such person). For the purpose of Section 304, EPCRA, the term includes motor vehicles, rolling stock and aircraft, shipping, and pipelines. "First responder" means fire fighters; law enforcement and emergency medical personnel as defined in WAC 296-824. "Hazardous chemical" means any chemical which is a physical hazard or a health hazard as defined by OSHA Hazard Communication Standard (29 CFR 1910.1200). Exceptions to the definition of "hazardous chemical" in EPCRA and in 29 CFR 1910.1200 shall also apply in this chapter. Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 Appendix Three 2 of 14 i "Health hazard" means a chemical for which there is statistically significant evidence based on at least one study conducted in accordance with established scientific principles that acute or chronic health effects may occur in exposed individuals. The term health hazard includes chemicals, which are carcinogens, toxic, or highly toxic agents which act on the hematopoietic system, and agents which damage the lungs, skin, eyes, or mucous membrane. "LEPC" means the Local Emergency Planning Committee established for each state emergency planning district established by the State Emergency Response Commission (P.L. 99-499). "Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS)" means the sheet required to be developed under Section 1910.1200(g) of Title 29 CFR, as that section may be adopted from time to time. "NRT-1 guidebook" means the Hazardous Materials Emergency Planning Guide published by the National Response Team, March 1987. "NRT-1 guidelines" means the criteria for review of hazardous materials emergency plans. "OSHA" means Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970. "Person" means any individual, trust, firm, joint stock company, corporation (including a government corporation), partnership, association, state, municipality, commission, political subdivision of state, or interstate body. "Physical hazard" means a chemical for which there is scientifically valid evidence that it is a combustible liquid, a compressed gas, explosive, flammable, or organic peroxide, an oxidizer, pyrophoric, unstable (reactive), or water reactive. "Release" means any spill, leaking, pumping, pouring, emitting, emptying, discharging, injecting, escaping, leaching, dumping, or disposing to the environment of any hazardous chemical, extremely hazardous substance, or toxic chemical. "SARA" means Superfund Amendment and Reauthorization Act of 1986, as adopted. "SERC" means the State Emergency Response Commission for Washington State. (RCW 38.52.040(2) and 99-499.) "TERC" means Tribal Emergency Response Commission. "Title III" means Title III of the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization act of 1986: also titled the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act of 1986, as amended. "Toxic chemical" means a substance described in Section 313 (c) of EPCRA, as now Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 Appendix Three 3of14 i ,f authorized or hereafter adopted. "WISHA" means Washington Industrial Safety and Health Act of 1973. WAC 118-40-040 STATE EMERGENCY RESPONSE COMMISSION ESTABLISHMENT, MEMBERSHIP, CHAIRPERSON. (1) In keeping with the provisions of Section 301 (a) of EPCRA, the EMC appoints the State Emergency Response Commission membership composed of a representative of the following agencies and organizations: (a) Military Department. (b) Department of Ecology. (c) Washington State Patrol. (d) Department of Transportation. (e) Department of Health. (f) Department of Labor and Industries. (g) Local Emergency Manager. (h) Washington State Association of Fire Chiefs. (i) Private Industry. (j) Local Emergency Planning Committee (eastern Washington representative). (k) Local Emergency Planning Committee (western Washington representative) (1) Transportation Industry (2) The chairperson and vice-chairperson for the State Emergency Response Commission shall be appointed by the Emergency Management Council. (3) The State Emergency Response Commission shall seek the attendance and active participation of representatives of the following agencies and organizations at all commission meetings. (a) Tribal response commission(s). (b) Federal Emergency Management Agency. (c) Environmental Protection Agency. (d) U.S. Department of Transportation (e) Washington State Attorney General. WAC 118-40-050 COMMISSION--PURPOSE RESPONSIBILITIES The purpose of the State Emergency Response Commission is to coordinate hazardous material issues and carry out the mandate of EPCRA (P.L. 99-499), as now authorized or hereafter adopted. The State Emergency Response Commission shall be responsible for the establishment of a state hazardous materials emergency preparedness, response, and community right-to-know program as required by EPCRA. Specific responsibilities of the Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 Appendix Three 4 of 14 I commission include, but are not limited to the following duties: (1) Appointment of such ad hoc committees and working groups as required. (2) Designation of local emergency planning districts. (3) Receive and record initial appointment of, and subsequent revisions to, Local Emergency Planning Committee membership. (4) Review and evaluate local emergency response plans. I (5) Administer and coordinate responsibilities for State Emergency Response Commission members for implementing the EPCRA program in Washington State. (6) Establish procedures for the receipt of, management and access to all notifications, reports, plans and all other information as required by EPCRA. i (7) Coordinate with the Environmental Protection Agency on EPCRA implementation. ll WAC 118-40-060 Military Department—EPCRA RESPONSIBILITIES. 1 Specific responsibilities of the Military Department include, but are not limited to, the following duties: (1) Receive and record verbal emergency toxic chemical release reports through the twenty-four-hour duty officer system and make appropriate notifications. Track and maintain records of such notifications. (2) Develop emergency planning guidance and provide assistance to LEPC's in the development of an emergency response plan for their district. i (3) Coordinate the review of each LEPC emergency plan as it is submitted. (4) Serve as repository agency for the LEPC response plans. (5) Set up community EPCRA education and training program addressing mitigation, emergency preparedness, disaster response, and long term disaster recovery. (6) Provide adequate staff support for the State Emergency Response Commission to develop agendas, prepare minutes, coordinate meeting places, draft policy letters, and carry out other support functions as needed. (7) Prepare and respond to correspondence for signature by the chairperson of the State Emergency Response Commission. (8) Receive and coordinate the distribution of correspondence, information, and written reports to offices of representative State Emergency Response y Commission agencies and organizations, TERCs, LEPCs, as well as other Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 Appendix Three 5of14 i governmental and non-governmental agencies when appropriate or when requested. (9) Develop apply for, and administer training, exercises, and planning programs as authorized and funded through section 305 of EPCRA. (10) Provide non-first responder training and maintain related records for the state hazardous materials training, exercise, and planning programs as authorized and funded through section 305 of EPCRA. (a) Training may be attended by emergency first responders including firefighters, law enforcement, environmental, and emergency medical personnel. Other constituencies to be trained include federal, state, and local governmental employees who may directly or indirectly involve themselves in a hazardous materials incident. Such personnel may include health officials, public works personnel, elected officials, emergency and city managers, and personnel employed by private industry. (b) Emergency training programs for non-first responders shall be designed to improve emergency planning, preparedness, mitigation, response, and recovery capabilities. Such programs shall provide special emphasis with respect to emergencies and responsibilities associated with hazardous materials and EPCRA. WAC 118-40-070 DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY — EPCRA RESPONSIBILITIES. Specific responsibilities of the department of ecology include, but are not limited to, the following duties: (1) Serve as advisor to the commission on emergency spill response and environmental restoration issues. (2) Serve as advisor for emergency responder equipment and training needs at the state and local levels. (3) Serve as advisor for on-scene spill response and environmental needs at the state and local levels. (4) Serve as advisor to the commission on community right-to-know issues. (5) As required under subsection 301(a) of EPCRA, coordinate development, implementation, and maintenance of an EPCRA Community Right-to-Know Program which may include, but is not limited to: (a) Data management of reports and notifications submitted by businesses. Such reports and notifications shall be retained for a minimum of three years. Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 Appendix Three 6 of 14 i i (b) Technical assistance to businesses regarding compliance with EPCRA. (c) Accessing and communicating information to the public. (d) Outreach to businesses and the public regarding EPCRA. WAC118-40-080 WASHINGTON STATE PATROL - EPCRA RESPONSIBILITIES. 1 Specific responsibilities of the Washington State Patrol include, but are not limited to, the following duties; (1) Serve as advisor to the commission on emergency response and coordination of on-scene activities on state and interstate highways and other areas where it has been designated the incident command agency. (2) Provide first responder training and maintain related records for state hazardous materials training as authorized through Section 305 of EPCRA. (a) Training may be attended by emergency first responders, including firefighters, law enforcement, environmental, and emergency medical personnel. Other constituencies to be trained include federal, state, and local governmental employees who may directly or indirectly involve S themselves in a hazardous materials incident. Such personnel may include health officials, public works personnel, elected officials, emergency and city managers, and personnel employed by private industry. (b) Emergency training programs for first responders shall be designed to improve emergency planning, preparedness, mitigation, response, and recovery capabilities. Such programs shall provide special emphasis with respect to emergencies and responsibilities associated with hazardous materials and EPCRA. (3) Serve as advisor for emergency responder equipment and training needs at the state and local levels. WAC 118-40-150 EMERGENCY PLANNING DISTRICTS — DESIGNATION. j (1) The chief elected official of the local emergency planning district shall appoint the Local Emergency Planning Committee. (2) Cities and towns that do not have active emergency management organizations as required by chapter 38.52 RCW are considered part of the county planning district in which they are located for the purposed of EPCRA emergency response planning. (3) Any town, city or political jurisdiction identified in RCW 38.52.070 may petition the State Emergency Response Commission to be designated as a local i emergency planning district. Prior to the approval of such designation the proposed local emergency planning district must have selected the membership Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 Appendix Three 7of14 i of the proposed Local Emergency Planning Committee and be in full compliance with the requirements of EPCRA. (4) Any local emergency planning district and the respective local emergency planning committee existing prior to the effective date of this rule change shall be recognized. (5) An existing local emergency planning district may petition the state emergency response commission to dissolve its independent status and either join the jurisdiction of the county in which it is included or join with an adjacent local emergency planning committee. WAC 118-40-160 LOCAL COMMITTEE--ORGANIZATION MEMBERSHIP (1) Each local committee shall include, at a minimum, representation from each of the following groups or types of organizations as specified by Section 301 (c) of EPCRA: (a) State and local officials. (b) Law enforcement. (c) Emergency management. (d) Firefighting. (e) First aid. (f) Health profession. (g) Local environmental. (h) Hospital. (i) Transportation personnel. (j) Broadcast and print media. (k) Community groups. (1) Owners and operators of facilities subject to the requirements of Section 302 (b) of EPCRA. (2) Each Local Emergency Planning Committee shall appoint a chairperson and establish rules by which the committee shall operate. (3) Committee rules shall include provisions for public notification of committee activities, public meetings to discuss the emergency plan, public comments, response to such comments by the committee, and distribution of emergency response plans to the general public. (4) Each Local Emergency Planning Committee shall submit annually, to the State Emergency Response Commission, a list of their membership and the organizations they represent. WAC 118-40-170 LOCAL EMERGENCY PLANNING COMMITTEE RESPONSIBILITIES (1) Each local emergency planning committee shall complete the preparation of a Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 Appendix Three 8of14 i hazardous materials emergency response plan. In the development of the plan, as specified by Sections 303(a), (b), (c) and 324(a), (b), EPCRA, committee duties include, but are not limited to: j y (a) Forming a local planning team. (b) Designating a team leader. (c) Evaluating the resources needed to develop, implement, and exercise the emergency plan. (d) Identifying existing emergency response equipment and personnel. j (e) Conducting a needs assessment of emergency response equipment and personnel requirements. (f) Providing oversight for preparation of the plan by the local planning team. I (2) Each local committee shall establish procedures for receiving and processing requests from the general public for information under Section 324 (including Tier II information under Section 312) EPCRA. Such procedures shall include the I designation of an official to serve as committee coordinator for all information requests. I 1 WAC 118-40-180 HAZARDOUS MATERIAL EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN— CONTENT GUIDELINES EVALUATION PROCESS. j i (1) Each Local Emergency Planning Committee shall complete a hazardous materials emergency response plan as required by Section 303 (a), (b), (c), EPCRA. (2) The Local Emergency Planning Committee shall transmit three copies of the completed plan to: 1 ■ Washington State Emergency Response Commission ■ Washington Military Department Emergency Management Division (3) At a minimum, the plan shall include the requirements of EPCRA, the standards of the NRT-1 guidelines, and the concepts of the Washington State Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan as it is written. i (4) Upon receipt of a Local Emergency Planning Committee hazardous material emergency response plan, the State Emergency Response Commission shall: (a) Send a letter to the Local Emergency Planning Committee formally acknowledging the receipt of the plan and informing them of the review process. (b) Copies of the plan will then be reviewed for comment within ninety days of receipt as required by EPCRA. (c) Upon completion of this review the State Emergency Response Commission shall, as appropriate, send a letter to the submitting Local Emergency Planning Committee acknowledging receipt and providing Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 Appendix Three 9of14 reviewer's comments as appropriate in meeting the intent of EPCRA. (5) The Local Emergency Planning Committees shall review and update as appropriate their plans annually. Changes to the plan shall be submitted to the State Emergency Response Commission. If there are no changes to the local plan, the Local Emergency Planning Committee shall provide written notification to the State Emergency Response Commission within thirty days of the reviews completion. WAC 118-40-300 EPCRA--FACILITIES COMPLIANCE The owner or operator of a facility shall meet all of the applicable requirements of EPCRA, or of rules adopted by the administrator to implement EPCRA, as now authorized or hereafter amended, including the planning, notification, reporting, access, and information availability requirements as specified by Sections 301, 302, 303, 304, 311, 312, 313, 324 of EPCRA. WAC 118-40-400 EPCRA--ENFORCEMENT, PENALTIES. Enforcement of all EPCRA provisions and the administration of penalties for violations of the provisions shall be pursuant to Section 325 of EPCRA, as now authorized or hereafter amended. II. REVISED CODE OF WASHINGTON TITLE 70 70.136.010 Legislative Intent It is the intent of the legislature to promote and encourage advance planning, cooperation, and mutual assistance between applicable political subdivisions of the state and persons with equipment, personnel, and expertise in the handling of hazardous materials incidents, by establishing limitations on liability for those persons responding in accordance with the provisions of RCW 70.136.020 through 70.136.070. 70.136.020 Definitions The definitions set forth in this section apply throughout RCW 70.136.010 through 70.136.070. (1) "Hazardous materials" means: (a) Materials which, if not contained may cause unacceptable risks to human life within a specified area adjacent to the spill, seepage, fire, explosion, or other release, and will, consequently, require evacuation; (b) Materials that, if spilled, could cause unusual risks to the general public and to emergency response personnel responding at the scene; (c) Materials that, if involved in a fire will pose unusual risks to emergency response personnel; (d) Materials requiring unusual storage or transportation conditions to assure Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 Appendix Three 10 of 14 1 , safe containment; or (e) Materials requiring unusual treatment, packaging, or vehicles during transportation to assure safe containment. i (2) "Applicable political subdivisions of the state" means cities, towns, counties, fire districts, and those port authorities with emergency response capabilities. i (3) "Person" means an individual, partnership, corporation, or association. (4) "Public agency" means any agency, political subdivision, or unit of local government of this state including, but not limited to, municipal corporations, quasi-municipal corporations, special purpose districts, and local service districts; any agency of state government; any agency of the United States; any Indian tribe recognized as such by the federal government; and any political subdivision of another state. (5) "Hazardous materials incident" means an incident creating a danger to persons, property, or the environment as a result of spillage, seepage, fire, explosion, or release of hazardous materials, or the possibility thereof. (6) "Governing body" means the elected legislative council, board, commission or the chief executive of the applicable political subdivision of the state with public safety responsibility. (7) "Incident command agency" means the pre-designated or appointed agency charged with coordinating all activities and resources at the incident scene. (8) "Representative" means an agent from the designated hazardous materials incident command agency with the authority to secure the services of persons with hazardous materials expertise or equipment. yy (9) "Profit" means compensation for rendering care, assistance, or advise in excess of I expenses actually incurred. 70.136.030 Incident Command Agencies -- Designation by political subdivisions i The governing body of each applicable political subdivision of this state shall designate 1 a hazardous materials incident command agency within its respective boundaries, and file this designation with the State Emergency Response Commission. In designating an incident command agency, the political subdivision shall consider the training, manpower, expertise, and equipment of various available agencies as well as the International Fire Code and other existing codes and regulations. Along state and interstate highway corridors, the Washington State Patrol shall be the designated incident command agency unless, by mutual agreement, that role has been assumed by another designated incident command agency. If a political subdivision has not designated an incident command agency within six Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 Appendix Three 11 of 14 i months after July 26, 1987, the Washington State Patrol shall then assume the role of incident command agency by action of the Chief until a designation has been made. 70.136.35.1 Incident Command Agencies -- Assistance From State Patrol. In political subdivisions where an incident command agency has been designated, the Washington State Patrol shall continue to respond with a supervisor to provide assistance to the incident command agency. 70.136.40 Incident command agencies — Emergency assistance agreements. Hazardous materials incident command agencies, so designated by all applicable political subdivisions of the state, are authorized and encouraged, prior to a hazardous materials incident, to enter individually or jointly into written hazardous materials emergency assistance agreements with any person whose knowledge or expertise is deemed potentially useful. 70.136.050 Persons and agencies rendering emergency aid in hazardous materials Incidents -- Immunity from liability -- Limitations. An incident command agency in the good faith performance of its duty, is not liable for civil damages resulting from any act or omission in the performance of its duties, other than acts or omissions constituting gross negligence or willful or wanton misconduct. Any person or public agency whose assistance has been requested by an incident command agency, who has entered into a written hazardous materials assistance agreement before or at the scene of the incident pursuant to RCW 70.136.060 and 70.136.070, and who, in good faith, renders emergency care, assistance, or advises with respect to a hazardous materials incident, is not liable for civil damages resulting from any act or omission in the rendering of such care, assistance, or advise, other than acts or omissions constituting gross negligence or willful or wanton misconduct. 70.136.055 Person Causing Hazardous Materials Incident Responsibility for incident clean-up-liability. See RCW 4.24.314. 70.136.060 Written Emergency Assistance Agreements Terms and conditions Records Hazardous materials emergency assistance agreements that are executed prior to a hazardous materials incident shall include the following terms and conditions: Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 Appendix Three 12 of 14 i i i) (1) The person or public agency requested to assist shall not be obligated to assist. (2) The person or public agency requested to assist may act only under the direction of the incident command agency or its representative. (3) The person or public agency requested to assist may withdraw its assistance if it i deems the actions or directions of the incident command agency to be contrary to accepted hazardous materials response practices. (4) The person or public agency requested to assist shall not profit from rendering the assistance. (5) Any person responsible for causing the hazardous materials incident shall not be covered by the liability standard defined in RCW 70.136.050. It is the responsibility of both parties to ensure that mutually agreeable procedures are established for identifying the incident command agency when assistance is requested, for recording the name of the person or public agency whose assistance is requested, and the time and date of the request, which records shall be retained for three years by the incident command agency. A copy of the official incident command agency designation shall be a part of the assistance agreement specified in this section. 70.136.070 Verbal Emergency Assistance Agreements Notification - Form (1) Verbal hazardous materials emergency assistance agreements may be entered f into at the scene of an incident where execution of a written agreement prior to the incident is not possible. A notification of the terms of this section shall be presented at the scene by the incident command agency or its representative to the person or public agency whose assistance is requested. The incident command agency and the person or public agency whose assistance is requested shall both sign the notification which appears in subsection (2) of this section, indicating the date and time of signature. If a requesting incident command agency deliberately misrepresents individual or agency status, that agency shall assume full liability for any damages resulting from the actions of the person or public agency whose assistance is requested, other than those damages resulting from gross negligence or willful or wanton misconduct. I (2) The notification required by subsection (1) of this section shall be in substantially the following form: NOTIFICATION OF "GOOD SAMARITAN" LAW i You have been requested to provide emergency assistance by a representative of a hazardous materials incident command agency. To encourage your assistance, the Washington State legislature has passed "Good Samaritan" legislation (RCW Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 Appendix Three 13 of 14 70.136.050) to protect you from potential liability. The law reads, in part: "Any person or public agency whose assistance has been requested by an incident command agency, who has entered into a written hazardous materials assistance agreement at the scene of the incident pursuant to RCW 70.136.070, and who, in good faith, renders emergency care, assistance, or advice with respect to a hazardous materials incident, is not liable for civil damages resulting from any act or omission in the rendering of such care, assistance, or advice, other than acts or omissions constituting gross negligence or willful or wanton misconduct." The law requires that you be advised of certain conditions to ensure your protection: 1. You are not obligated to assist and you may withdraw your assistance at any time. 2. You cannot profit from assisting. 3. You must agree to act under the direction of the incident command agency. 4. You are not covered by this law if you caused the initial accident. I have read and understand the above. (Name) Date Time I am a representative of a designated hazardous materials incident command agency and I am authorized to make this request for assistance. (Name) (Agency) Date Time Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 Appendix Three 14 of 14 i ■ ty of Kent Hazardous Material Response Plan Appendixr Distribution is Copy # Organization Location - Address Agency Rep. r 1 KEMD - Master EMD ANNEX Program Manager 2 Fire Administration FIRE STATION 74 - ADMIN Fire Chief 3 Fire Operations Division FIRE STATION 74 - ADMIN Deputy Chief Emergency EMD ANNEX Emergency Manager I 4 Management Division 5 Fire Training POLICE-FIRE TRAINING CENTER Battalion Chief l Fire Administrative & CENTENNIAL CENTER 6 Support Services FIRE PREVENTION OFFICE Division Chief Division 7 FIRE EMS OFFICER STATION 74 - ADMIN Battalion Chief 8 Fire Safety & STATION 74 - FIRE Battalion Chief Accreditation SAFETY OFFICE j 9 Fire Prevention Division CENTENNIAL CENTER Division Chief FIRE PREVENTION OFFICE 10 EMS/Suppression FIRE STATION 74 B/C OFFICE Battalion Chiefs FIRE D.O.C. j 11 EMS/Suppression -Battalion 71 BATTALION 71 APPARATUS Battalion Chiefs 12 Fire Prevention Division CENTENNIAL CENTER FIRE Division Chief PREVENTION LIBRARY 13 Fire Accreditation STATION 74-FIRE Battalion Chief Library SAFETY OFFICE 14 Emergency MOBILE COMMAND POST Division Chief Management Division APPARATUS 744 Operations - STATION 76 15 Suppression - Hazmat HAZARDOUS MATERIALS HazMat Team Leader Team APPARATUS 760 r } I Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 Appendix Four 1 of 3 Copy # Organization Location - Address Agency Rep. Emergency KENT EMERGENCY 16 Management Division COORDINATION CENTER Division Chief REFERENCE LIBRARY 17 Police Administration POLICE HEADQUARTERS Police Chief 18 Police Administration POLICE HEADQUARTERS Deputy Police Chief 19 Police Patrol POLICE HQ - PATROL DIVISION Patrol Captain COMMANDERS OFFICE 20 Police Training POLICE/FIRE TRAINING Training Sergeant 21 Public Works PUBLIC WORKS - CENTENNIAL Public Works Director Administration CENTER 22 Public Works PUBLIC WORKS - CENTENNIAL Deputy Public Works Administration CENTER Director Public Works PUBLIC WORKS - CENTENNIAL Environmental 23 Engineering CENTER Engineer Manager Environmental Division 24 Public Works Operations PUBLIC WORKS SHOPS D.O.C. Manager PUBLIC WORKS D.O.C. 25 Fire Operations Division STATION 71 Station Officer REFERENCE LIBRARY 26 Fire Operations Division STATION 72 Station Officer REFERENCE LIBRARY 27 Fire Operations Division STATION 73 Station Officer REFERENCE LIBRARY 28 Fire Operations Division STATION 74 Station Officer REFERENCE LIBRARY 29 Fire Operations Division STATION 75 Station Officer REFERENCE LIBRARY 30 Fire Operations Division STATION 76 Station Officer REFERENCE LIBRARY 31 Fire Operations Division STATION 77 Station Officer REFERENCE LIBRARY 32 Fire Operations Division STATION 78 Station Officer REFERENCE LIBRARY STATION 74 ADMIN 33 FIRE ADMIN MAYORS LEADERSHIP Fire Chief REFERENCE LIBRARY Washington State 34 Emergency Response WA EMD - CAMP MURRAY SERC Chair Commission Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 Appendix Four 2 of 3 i f Copy # Organization Location - Address Agency Rep. 35 Spare I 36 Spare 37 Spare 38 Spare 1 39 Spare 40 Spare i i I i r Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 Appendix Four 3 of 3 i i City of Kent Hazardous Material Response Plan Annex Anthrax Response Protocol Table Table of Contents ..................... .................................i Definition ...................... ...............................ii I Operational Response Guidelines ...................... ..........I....................1 II Indicators of a Credible Threat ...................... ...............................2 III Threat Levels ...................... ...............................3 IV Response Guidelines by Threat Level ...................... ...............................4 V Recommended Treatments .........I............ ...............................5 VI Sample Handling ...................... ...............................6 VII Packaging Specimens for Testing ...................... ...............................7 I. Powders ...................... ...............................7 II. Liquids ...........I........I. ...............................8 VIII Specimen Labeling ...................... ...............................8 IX Temporary Storage and Disposal .......I.............. ...............................8 X Clean up Procedures 9 ............................... XI Crime Scene Indicators ...................... ...............................9 APPENDIX ONE: Anthrax Check Sheet for First Responders I Personal Protection at the Initial Level of Response ..................... ...............................1 II Initial Actions ...................... ........I......................1 III Powder/Product Information I..................... ...............................2 IV Package/Envelope Details 2 ............................... V Fact Finding Information ...................... ...............................3 VI Decontamination ...................... ...............................3 APPENDIX TWO: Advice to Citizens Handling Packages ...................... ...............................1 Hazardous Materials Response Plan j 2009 Annex A - Protocol City of Kent Hazardous Material Response Plan Annex Anthraxr Definition: What is Anthrax i Anthrax is a bacterium. Anthrax bacterium form spores, which are highly stable and may remain viable in soil for years. Dried bacterial agents tend to be amber to brown in color. These spores, when airborne and inhaled in sufficient quantities, can transmit the disease to humans. Additionally, anthrax can be contracted by ingestion or introduction into an open wound. Anthrax is not transmitted from person to person. In its early stages, anthrax can be effectively treated with antibiotics. If infected by anthrax, an incubation period of 1 to 7 days may pass prior to any symptoms developing. The onset of symptoms is gradual and non-specific, however, some of the following symptoms may occur in the pulmonary form: mild fever, malaise, chills, nausea, swelling of the lymph nodes and mild chest discomfort (flu like symptoms) followed by respiratory distress, shock, and death. In the intestinal form the symptoms are intense stomach pain, bowel obstruction dehydration, diarrhea, and blood poisoning. Responders can be protected from anthrax spores by wearing splash protection, gloves, full-face HEPA respirators (Level C protection) or SCBA (Level B protection). Our structural firefighting ensemble with SCBA will provide the required initial protection from biological agents. All Anthrax Threats Personnel who receive the initial contact, either in person or telephonically, shall attempt to obtain as much information as possible. The exact words of a written threat or statements made on the telephone need to be documented to assist law enforcement in the investigation of the source of the threat. Citizens or the recipient of a threat should be advised of the following issues: ® Reassure the person reporting/calling that anthrax is not contagious and can be treated. I ■ If indicated, tell the caller to leave the envelope or device and evacuate and seal off the immediate area and retreat to another location that would minimize exposure to others. i ® If indicated, direct the caller to make every effort to not move or spread the product and cause further contamination. f ® Secure a name, call back number and address of the calling party. Hazardous Materials Response Plan j j 2009 Annex A - Protocol City of Kent Anthrax Response Protocol I. Operational Response Guidelines ❑ Establish command, size up and call for needed resources ❑ Contact a responsible party for the premises ❑ Isolate and deny entry ❑ Secure and contain the immediate scene ❑ Establish zones (hot, warm, cold) ❑ Ensure that threat assessment is completed in timely manner and that appropriate contacts are made, i.e., Public Health, Chief, law enforcement, etc. ❑ Conduct evacuation to secure area and isolate potentially contaminated patients ❑ Consider shelter in place in large structures ❑ Control building operating systems (HVAC, elevators, fire control panel, etc) ❑ Establish decontamination areas as needed ❑ For multiple patients, request MCl/HazMat Response ❑ Establish and maintain communications links with victims, consider assigning a Firefighter/Officer to this task ❑ Consider the potential for a secondary device Hazardous Materials Response Plan 1 of 9 2009 Annex A - Protocol i I II. Indicators of a Credible Threat A. Envelope/package contains some form of an articulated threat (written j threat, photos, etc.) I B. An articulated threat was conveyed to that location, business or person by E-mail, telephone message, etc. C. Some type of material such as powder or liquid which cannot be easily j explained as usual or common for that item, area or location is detected in the envelope or package i i D. The recipient, addressee or the site at which the item was received is a likely target I Other Clues in determining if a package or envelope may be suspicious: ❑ What is it that makes the letter/package/substance seem suspicious? ❑ Lack of return address ❑ Suspicious sender ❑ Postmark from a place the addressee was not expecting ❑ Return address is bogus, and/or is totally unfamiliar ❑ Bulky or misshapen package ❑ Unexplained oily substance on package ❑ Unusual liquid, spray, or vapor ❑ Unexplained substance found in a suspicious location, etc... ❑ Reporting party has unexplained physical symptoms ❑ Why does the person reporting believe they would be a target of a terrorist threat? ❑ Is powder or some other suspicious substance visible on the outside of the package? If so, what does the substance look like? ❑ Was the person exposed to the substance by touching it or just in the same f room? ❑ Did the person see particles in the air, or a cloud of particles? ❑ Regular postage stamps used instead of meter imprint/strip and/or excessive postage used. ❑ Address (and return) written or hand printed instead of labeled or machine/computer printed with no return address. Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2 of 9 2009 Annex A -Protocol I ❑ Scotch tape used to help seal envelope. ❑ Written return address/zip code does not match or correspond to postmark, or postal hand stamp. ❑ When envelope held up to bright light, a fine residue powder, granular substance might be in evidence. ❑ When tipped side to side, package or envelope contents might reveal noise like sand inside. ❑ There is no letter inside the envelope (when held up to light). ❑ Any additional non-standard statements written or printed on package or envelope Based on the answers to the above questions, an assessment of whether or not the package or item presents a credible threat can begin. It should be remembered that the presence of one or more of these indicators does not, in and of itself, mean that the object presents a "credible threat." A number of factors that you will consider will contribute to that determination. Personnel are encouraged to utilize their training and experience, judgment, and common sense. III. Anthrax Threat Levels Threat Level 0 Envelope or package with no threat and no unknown material contained - but the reporting party feels it is suspicious. Threat Level 1 Envelope, package or location with an articulated written chemical, biological, or radiological threat, but no unknown material present. Threat Level 2 Envelope, package, or location with an unknown material (powder, liquid, etc.) but no articulated threat. Threat Level 3 Envelope, package, or location with an articulated threat and some unknown material inside or spilled from it. Hazardous Materials Response Plan 3 of 9 2009 Annex A - Protocol I i IV. Response Guidelines by Threat Level Threat Level 0 Envelope or package with no threat and no unknown material contained (powder, liquid, etc.) — But the reporting party feels it is suspicious • Discuss the situation with the reporting party • No emergency response necessary unless you suspect possible explosive device, or information suggests a higher- level response Threat Level 1 Envelope, package or location with an articulated written chemical, biological or radiological threat, but no unknown material. l • Notify Kent PD • If threat is deemed not credible, complete written report, conduct investigation • Protect evidence and retain as per Kent PD procedures • Notify FBI prior to transport Threat Level 2 Envelope, package or location with an unknown material f (powder, liquid, etc.) but no articulated threat I • Notify Kent PD • Screen for chemical, explosive, and radiological agents • Attempt to contact shipper/sender • Tests to confirm the presence of biological agents will need to be conducted at an appropriate public health laboratory See sample handling section • If non-credible, Kent PD will manage scene • Complete written report, including all requested information • Store as per local protocol unless advised otherwise • Notify FBI if field testing for chemical, radiological, or explosive agents are suggestive of terrorism. i Threat Level 3 Envelope, package or location with an articulated threat and some unknown material inside or spilled from it • Notify Kent PD • Screen for chemical, explosive, and radiological agents • Attempt to contact shipper/sender • Tests to confirm the presence of biological agents will need to be conducted at an appropriate public health laboratory (See pg. 7 Sample Handling Section). • If non-credible, Kent PD will manage scene • Package specimens for delivery to WA State lab in consultation with SKC Public Health Department (See pg. 8 Packaging Specimens for Testing). Hazardous Materials Response Plan 4 of 9 2009 Annex A -Protocol I V. Recommended Treatments A. Contamination: Highly unlikely or non-existent • Full field decontamination of civilians is not needed and is not recommended B. Contamination: Slightly likely • Field decontamination (technical) is not recommended • Routine hand washing with warm water and soap for one minute is recommended • People at the location may be released to return home. • A routine body shower (warm soap and water) is recommended • They should wash their clothes in a washer and dryer with laundry detergent • Name and contact information should be forwarded to the local health official for documentation, and case follow-up as necessary C. Contamination: Highly likely to confirmed • Full field decontamination (technical) is not recommended • Routine body shower with warm water and soap is recommended • Bag and label removed clothing. Store securely until diagnostic testing can be completed • Issue modesty or replacement clothing as needed • Name and point of contact information should be forwarded to local health official for documentation and case follow up • People can then be released to return to home NOTE. The guidelines listed above are a minimum, unless advised, altered, or recommended otherwise by emergency services personnel or Seattle/King County Public Health Officer. Hazardous Materials Response Plan 5 of 9 2009 Annex A -Protocol i I VI. Sample Handling Based on the risk assessment, some samples may not require laboratory analysis. If Seattle Public Health and the Washington State Public Health Lab indicate that they will not accept a sample, the PD, Fire Department will coordinate local storage of the sample. Chain-of-custody documentation MUST accompany each specimen. Specific information to be documented when taking a sample (coordinated with PD for evidence preservation and documentation): o Location the sample was taken from o Time and Date o Name of member (s) who took sample o Names of member(s) who handled sample ` o Other pertinent information f I A. If there is only a small or minute amount of substance available send all to the State lab. The State lab's ability to perform appropriate and accurate testing may be compromised by sending an inadequate j sample. B. It is best to not use the field test to support public information release. These tests are first tier field tests that cannot be relied on as definitive finding. C. Public Health will work with responders and other emergency agencies to coordinate the release of quality and accurate information. I ALL SAMPLES TO BE TRANSPORTED TO THE STATE LAB MUST FIRST BE SCREENEDFORI RADIOLOGICAL AND CHEMICAL CONTAMINATION PRIOR TO PACKAGING A LABEL MUST BE AFFIXED INDICATION THAT THESE TESTS HAVE L T . Hazardous Materials Response Plan 6 of 9 2009 Annex A -Protocol i I D. The transfer of materials to be sampled MUST be coordinated through Seattle King County Public Health Department: 206 296-4774 — 24-hour number 206 296-4606 - Duty Officer (fallback if answering service unavailable) When calling during business hours 8 am to 5 pm , M-F, give your name and say that you are calling about a suspicious substance and ask to speak to a "BERT team member" After hours and weekends, the above telephone number will connect you to the answering service for Public Health. Tell the operator that you are calling about a suspicious substance and that you need to talk to the communicable disease officer on call. The operator will take your name and call back number. You will receive a call back. Specimens will NOT be accepted unless Seattle/King County Public Health call the Washington State Public Health Laboratories at 1-877- 539-4344. E. Samples submitted to Public Health for testing should be treated as potential evidence and transported via PD officer to the Washington State lab located in Shoreline at: 1610 N.E. 150 St. Shoreline, WA. DIRECTIONS: Northbound I-5: Take exit NE 145t" St. (WA 523), head east on 145t" Ave NE, turn LEFT onto 15th Ave. NE, turn RIGHT onto NE 1501n, the Washington State Public Health Laboratories will be on your left. VII. Packaging Specimens for Testing After screening the specimen for chemical, radiological, or explosive materials. Care should be taken when bagging letters and packages to minimize spread of pathogens. Documentation of any screening must accompany the specimen to the laboratory. A. Powders • Place the specimen or a representative sample of the specimen in a plastic zip-lock bag and wipe the outside of the bag with a solution of 9 parts water and 1 part household bleach. Place a biohazard label on the bag and follow steps 1-4. Bleach solution should be made fresh. 1. Place the zip-lock bag into a leak proof container with a tight cover that is labeled "BIOHAZARD" 2. Place this container into a second leak proof container with a tight cover that is labeled "BIOHAZARD". The size of the second container should be less than a one gallon paint can. 3. Place the second container into a third leak proof container that is labeled "BIOHAZARD". The third container should be no larger than a one gallon paint can. Hazardous Materials Response Plan 7 of 9 2009 Annex A -Protocol i 4. Containers should meet state and federal regulations for transport of hazardous material, and be properly labeled. B. Liquids • If possible, liquids should be transferred to a plastic container, if there is a large amount of liquid, a sample should be collected in a 100 ml screw top plastic container. • Wrap the container with absorbent material (enough to absorb the j full amount of liquid) and place in a zip-lock bag. Wipe the outside of the bag with a solution of 9 parts water and 1 part household bleach. • Continue to follow steps 1-4 above. VIII. Specimen Labeling PROPERLY MARK OR LABEL THE THIRD CONTAINER WITH EVIDENCE MARKINGS DATE: TIME: I MEMBER WHO TOOK THE SAMPLE: f i MEMBER WHO HANDLED THE SAMPLE: INCIDENT NUMBER: CASE NUMBER: I f IX. Temporary Storage and Disposal Samples collected for storage should be transported by Kent Police to evidence storage. Do not bring these items back to the Fire Station. Do not allow suspected items to be brought to the Fire Station for testing regardless of packaging or quantity. All investigations and testing performed shall be done at the location of discovery. Samples shall be placed in containment for transportation to the WA State Public Health Lab. These samples will be held pending further need for investigation. ' i Hazardous Materials Response Plan 8 of 9 2009 Annex A -Protocol i Disposal after the necessary holding period will be the responsibility of Kent PD. Note: All material collected may be subject to transportation to the Public Health laboratory or may be tested locally at any time. X. Clean up Procedures Fire Department personnel may elect to provide a 5% concentration of (Household) bleach for clean-up of any unknown substance provided the following criteria are met: ❑ Material does not fit the protocol for a biological agent. ❑ Material fails the organic Haz-Cat screening Crime Scene Indicators If the substance or item meets the criteria for suspicion and credibility and is indicated as an organic by the Haz-Cat screening, the area will be considered a crime scene until the material is definitively tested. Hazardous Materials Response Plan 9 of 9 2009 Annex A -Protocol i City of Kent Hazardous Material Response Plan Annex A - Anthrax Response Protocol i APPENDIX ONE ANTHRAX CHECK SHEET FOR FIRST RESPONDERS For First Responders who establish or respond to a credible threat I. Personal Protection at the Initial Level of Response Avoid wearing standard firefighter turnout gear into potentially contaminated areas when responding to reports involving biological agents. Responders may use a NIOSH approved full face piece respirator with a P-100 filter or a full face piece powered air purifying respirator (PAPR) with high efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filters and disposable hooded coveralls, gloves, and foot coverings when it can be determined that: • An aerosol-generating device was not used to create high airborne concentration, • Dissemination was by a letter or package that can be easily bagged. II. Initial Actions When Entering an Area of Concern • Interrogation: Do not touch or handle the patient, his/her belongings, or the item. • Providing Initial Patient care: Reassurance, wash hands or shower with soap and water. • Handling patient personal belongings: bag clothing items in contact with letter / pkg. • Determining when aerosolization is likely and change to SCBA is necessary • Consider shutting down ventilation with permission of Building Engineer if aerosolization is suspected. CRIME SCENE: YES NO OFFICERS NAME: KPD CASE # PUBLIC EXPOSURE: YES NO EXPOSURE TYPE: Coetaneous Ingestion Inhaled (circle those that apply) Annex A Anthrax Response 1 of 3 2009 Appendix One Checklist I YES NO Did they touch it with their hands, or have anything else that touched it Who else touched it After touching it...what have they touched - door handles, office items, keyboards, phones, etc Did they taste it Did they smell it Are they expecting the package/envelope Have they received any threatening notes, phone calls, messages Are there threatening messages on the package Where has the item been, ( possible other contaminated areas) III. Powder/Product Information . Color: . Texture: . Quantity: . Location: . Any possible sources for the product in the area, like drywall dust after construction in the area, or white powder on an envelope next to a spilled container of coffee creamer? If so location and source. IV. Package/Envelope Details . Open Closed . Handwritten or poorly typed addresses Yes No . Incorrect titles Yes No . Title but no name Yes No . Misspelling of common words Yes No . Oily stains, discoloration's or odor Yes No . No return address Yes No Annex A Anthrax Response 2 of 3 2009 Appendix One Checklist i i . Excessive weight Yes No . Lopsided or uneven envelope Yes No • Protruding wires or aluminum foil Yes No . Excessive security material such as masking tape, string, etc Yes No . Visual distractions Yes No . Ticking sound Yes No . Restrictive endorsements such as "Personal" or "Confidential" Yes No . A city/state in the postmark that does not match the return address Yes No V. Fact Finding Information Was the recipient/business expecting the item Yes No Was there any previous threats Yes No VI. Decontamination Decontamination sequences currently used for hazardous material emergencies should be used as appropriate for the level of protection employed. Equipment can be decontaminated using soap and water, and 0.5% hypochlorite solution (one part household bleach to 10 parts water) can be used as appropriate or if gear had any visible contamination. Note that bleach will damage firefighter turnout. After taking off gear, response workers should shower using copious quantities of soap and water. Annex A Anthrax Response 3 of 3 2009 Appendix One Checklist f I City of Kent Hazardous Material Response Plan Annex A - Anthrax Response Protocol APPENDIX TWO HANDLING LETTERS AND PACKAGES Advice to citizens If you believe a letter or package is suspicious, the best course of action is to not open it 1. Examine each item before opening it and check for the following traits listed below. Use common sense when assessing the level of suspicion each of these traits presents: • Originated from a foreign country • Displays excessive postage • Has misspelled words • Addressed to a title only, rather than a specific person • Wrong title for the addressee, i.e., such as "Sergeant Reichert" • Package is rigid, lopsided, bulky, or contains a protruding item • No return address • Has a strange odor • The wrapper or envelope has stains from a substance inside 2. Do not open the letter/package in locations that could aid in the spread of hazardous material, such as near a fan, ventilation system intake, open window, etc. 3. Wear appropriate level protection for actions being taken. 4. Be sure any cuts or abrasions on your hands are properly covered before handling letter or package, latex gloves should be worn when handling any suspicious material. 5. Do not tear packages open. Use scissors or other appropriate tool that allows for opening packages without disturbing the contents. The goal is to be gentle enough so you don't create a dust cloud if a powder substance is present in the envelope. If you think the package or letter may actually contain some type of hazardous substance call 9-1-1 immediately. Annex A Anthrax Response 2009 Appendix Two Citizen Advice City of Kent Hazardous Material Response Plan L Annex TABLE OF CONTENTS i Section TOPIC Rage I Tableof Contents. .................................................................................. i Scope....................................................................................................... ii Purpose................................................................................................... 11 I. History of the Hazard................................................................................... 1 II. Hazard Vulnerability.................................................................................... 1 III. Technical Information and Facts... ............ 2 .......................... ...................... IV. Hazards to the Olympic Pipeline................................................................ 4 V. Training............................................................................................................ 5 VI. Potential Hazards to the Environment..................................................... 6 VII. Fire and Explosion Hazards......................................................................... 7 r VIII. Health Concerns............................................................................................ 8 IX. HazMat Scene Management Guide........................................................... 9 X. Combat Response......................................................................................... 12 XI. Notification, Evacuation, & Sheltering In-Place.................................... 15 i i i s Appendix 1.............. Valve Locations Appendix 2.............. Pipeline Markings Appendix 3.............. Response Data Sheets Appendix 4.............. Evacuation Grids Appendix 5.............. Map Sheets Hazardous Materials Response Plan i 2009 Annex 8 - TOC City of Kent Hazardous Material Response Plan Annex SCOPE The Olympic Pipe Line Company consists of over 400 miles of pipelines extending from refineries in northwest Washington to Portland Oregon. These pipelines carry refined liquid petroleum products: diesel, aviation fuel, (basically a form of kerosene) and gasoline. Underground high pressure pipelines remove the equivalent of 1,800 tanker trucks from the regions roadways each day and carry 441,000 barrels or 18,700,000 gallons of fuel each day. The pipeline in Kent was initially installed in 1965 and is a single 14" line that runs north to south in the Kent valley from milepost 114.5 to 120 approximately 5.5. miles long. Olympic mile post markers are 115-120. The Green River is at Mile Post 119.2. • The pipeline is located in the Puget Sound Energy right-of-way adjacent to the interurban trail on the west side of the Union Pacific Railroad track. • The pipeline runs underneath the Green River and under several City roadways. Currently 441,000 barrels (42 U.S. gallons per barrel) or 18,700,000 gallons flow through the pipeline each day. This would be equivalent to 1,800 additional tanker trucks on our roads and highways per day (or 56,000/month or 680,000/year). All of the vast volume of petroleum products transported by the pipeline moves through a highly automated system. Pressures, fluid characteristics, and rates of flow are monitored and controlled remotely by state-of-the-art telemetry from central control or dispatch rooms equipped with high technology, computer-supervised equipment. The Olympic Pipeline's system is operated by remote control from the Operations Control Center located in Renton, Washington. The Center is staffed 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a yea r. PURPOSE The following guide is intended to be used by first arriving fire units, as well as Incident Commanders, at responses involving the Olympic Pipeline. It is not intended as a comprehensive document in dealing with a spill or rupture; rather, it is meant to be used as an informational resource guide for a unique call type. Your training and common sense are still your best guides in how to deal with emergencies. While it was designed to be used exclusively on the Olympic Pipeline, the principles here can be applied to a large number of calls involving hazardous materials. This guide is an Annex to and shall be used in conjunction with the Hazardous Materials Response Plan and its referenced adjuncts. Hazardous Materials Response Plan ii 2009 Annex 8 - TOC i City of Kent Hazardous Material Response Plan Annex Olympic Pipeline Response Guide j I. HISTORY OF THE HAZARD 1 , 43 spills have been reported since 1965 totaling almost 821,000 gallons. Olympic Pipeline accounts for 65% of liquid fuel spills in Washington since 1985. In 1986 31,000 gallons of jet fuel leaked into the Des Moines Creek. In 1999 a rupture in Bellingham resulted in three fatalities, affected approximately 2 miles of streams and burned for several hours. The estimate property damage in Washington State is $10,759,357 from pipeline accidents. Since the Bellingham explosion, Olympic Pipeline is under a corrective action order by the Office of Pipeline safety and operates at 80% of maximum operating pressure. Kent has been fortunate, only a minor leak has occurred around the HOV on the south side of the Green River. II. HAZARD VULNERABILITY i f The potential for damage to the liquid petroleum pipeline by a large earthquake, third party damage, internal failure, terrorist act, or other initiating event presents a risk of release incident. Only through continued training and preparation by response personnel, maintenance on and the practice with equipment, and safety-oriented integrity management principles can this risk be reduced. British Petroleum and their subsidiary, Olympic Pipeline, have responded with a significant improvement to the safety of their system. A leak or rupture of the pipeline would expose vulnerabilities from: • Fire or explosion; could cause a conflagration to surrounding occupancies and put a tremendous strain on City resources. The Fire department would need all available firefighters to control the blaze; law enforcement to provide traffic and crowd control and possibly evacuations; Public Works in supplying infrastructure expertise, barricading and utility support. Other departments may receive emergency tasking as well to assist with longer term issues of support and recovery. Medical services, both public and private, may be overwhelmed if casualties are high. Movement of product through creeks, rivers and storm drains could cause downstream impacts and widespread fires. • Ground Contamination; can spread over the permeable ground surfaces, is a long-term problem. While a concern, there is little that can be done to stop or limit it unless there is a feature of the topography that lends itself to natural containment. This includes paved parking lots with curbs, streets, and natural depressions in the earth. Ground contamination could require a massive clean-up operation lasting several months. Hazardous Materlals Response Plan 2009 Annex 8 -OPL 1 of 21 • Waterway Contamination; a rupture of the pipeline near the Green River that allows product to flow down the banks into the waterway is more likely than a rupture of the pipe under the river. Once in the river the steep banks should help contain the vapors that are carried along with the current and winds not allowing them to spread into adjacent businesses and residences. Mill Creek is a small, slow moving stream which starts on the East Hill of Kent. While slow moving, the stream, like the Green River, does create a path for flammable vapors to travel close to highly concentrated business facilities. In addition it lacks the rivers high banks to contain the runoff and vapors. The City has extensive storm drain systems. Many of the storm drains are interconnected and create an ideal path for flammable or combustible liquids as well as the resulting vapors. The spread of product can be undetectable from surface streets until there is either an explosion or a monitoring device is lowered into the storm system. • Transportation; the proximity of the pipeline to major rail, highway, and population centers would impact movement and commerce in the Kent valley and the region. Effects would be dependent on the type and amount of product (leak or rupture), vapor, fire or both, time of day, weather conditions, and delay in detection or reporting. III. TECHNICAL INFORMATION AND FACTS i Two 16" main lines connect the refineries to Olympic's Allen Pump Station. Parallel lines of 16 inches and 20 inches extend from the Allen Pump Station to Renton, Washington, where a 14" line continues to Portland, Oregon. Products moving through the system are distributed to Olympic's delivery facilities and then to bulk terminals by means of smaller diameter delivery lines. The bulk terminals are usually near major population centers. There are five lines used to divert product from the main lines: 12" line from Renton to Seattle (Harbor Island) 12" line from Renton to Sea-Tac International Airport 8" line from the 14" main line to Tacoma 6" line from the 14" main line to Olympia 12" line from the 14" main line to Vancouver Within the City of Kent the pipeline is a 14 inch line constructed of carbon steel with walls .281 inches thick and is wrapped in heavy fiberglass. To guard against corrosion, the pipeline carries a small, controlled, electrical charge that is diverted to ground beds along its length. The pipeline is usually buried to a death of 30 to 48 inches, although the depth may vary greatly due to erosion and man made changes to the topography. The pipeline runs next to the Interurban Trail. It also runs underneath the Green River. An additional safety measure of the pipeline is that it is buried to a depth of eight feet and is encased in a steel sleeve anywhere it crosses under a rail line or crosses a roadway. Studies have been done to measure the effects of a train derailment on a buried pipeline, hence the additional depth and protection. As mentioned before, products moving through Olympic's lines are gasoline, diesel, and aviation fuel. Approximately 600/0 of the product transported through the system is gasoline destined for service stations throughout the Pacific Northwest. Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 Annex 8 -OPL 2 of 21 i Nearly 100% of the aviation jet fuel used at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport is delivered directly to re-fuelers or storage tanks by Olympic Pipeline. A. Pipeline Volume Chart (gallons) Length miles 14" line dia 16" line dia j 1 42,500 55,000 2 85,000 110,000 3 127,500 165,000 4 170,000 220,000 5 212,500 275,000 20* 850,000 1,100,000 j *Total distance between Renton and Tacoma stations and location of automatic valves. B. Pipeline Pressures Main line pump stations boost product flow using centrifugal pumps driven by electric motors, with the total installed being in excess of 45,000 j horsepower. Products move through Olympic's main line system at a rate of about 4 mph - about as fast as a brisk walk - taking approximately three days to complete the journey from origin to Portland, Oregon. Operating pressures within the pipeline range from 250 psi to 1,440 psi depending on the size of the line and product being delivered. The main line flows measured in gallons per minute (gpm) can vary from approximately 5,900 to 6,700 gpm depending on the size of the line and the product being delivered. i I Flow m and pressure (psi) are controlled b computers in Olympic's (9p ) p (p ) Y p Control Center in Renton, Washington. Shut down of the pipeline for maintenance or emergency is done by using valve blocks located throughout I the system. Olympic uses three types of valve blocks: r C. Pipeline Valves 1. Clapper Valves only restrict back flow and work immediately without outside manipulation (located at pumping stations only). 2. Hand-Operated Valves are shut by Olympic's personnel, only, in the field. A hand-operated valve takes approximately 2 to 8 minutes to shut once the person arrives at the valve site (which can take anywhere from 5 to 60 minutes according to Olympic Pipe Line). 3. Electric Motor Driven Valves are controlled by Olympic's Control Center in Renton, Washington. It takes approximately 45 to 90 seconds to completely close the valve using a computer-enhanced system. In the City of Kent there are only two valves of any kind that can be closed. They are hand-operated valves and are located on either bank of the Green River. Their main purpose is to help insure that product does not spill into Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 Annex 8 -OPL 3 of 21 and contaminate the river. All valves are to be operated by Olympic Pipeline personnel only to reduce the chance of damaging the system. see Appendix 1. There are no check valves in Kent to stop the back flow of product if there is a rupture. IV. HAZARDS TO THE OLYMPIC PIPELINE Olympic's Control Center is able to detect leaks and/or breaks in the system. Any break in the system will alert the Renton Control Center that there is a problem within the system. The greatest threat to the safe operation of the pipeline (according to Olympic) comes from an unlikely source: people living and working along the 400+ mile route. A. Mechanical Damage - Most commonly caused through third party damage by excavators or utility owners/operators. Although 19.122 RCW, Underground Utilities provides legislation requiring the use of "one call" system, this does not always occur. Third party damage can introduce dents with gauging leading to pipe failure. The pipeline runs parallel to the Union Pacific tracks also exposing it to mechanical damage should a derailment occur. Acts of terrorism can cause mechanical damage as well. B. Movement - The Puget Sound region is seismically active, with hundreds of earthquakes occurring each year. The pipeline is located in the Kent valley which is made of soft soil or a sandy loam and is susceptible to soil liquefaction during an earthquake. This force is analogous to those that move an unsecured garden house causing lateral forces that strain the pipe. Some communities have reported that the actual pipeline location, when checked by probing, is well outside the supposed location or right-of-way (5- 10 feet wide). This outside force can fatigue the pipe producing a partial collapse or buckling of the pipe. C. Internal corrosion - Corrosion leading to metal loss may cause general thinning of the pipe, pitting of the pipe, crevice corrosion in electric resistance and flash weld seams or stress corrosion cracking (SCC). D. Cracks in the Seam weld - Cracks may be increasing in length and depth from the operational pressure cycles that were created from inclusion on the weld line, inadequate pressure during welding, and excessive trim of the excess metal extruded during electric resistance welding. E. Gouges without a dent -- Gouges in the body of the pipe that may be due to construction damage. Also, cracks due to fatigue during shipment, stress corrosion cracks, or hydrogen cracks due to the environment that forms at the pipe surface. (Generally, these cracks are oriented along the length of the pipe or axially as this is the direction that is perpendicular to the maximum stress in a pipe or axially as this is the direction that is perpendicular to the maximum stress in a pipe which is due to pressure.) Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 Annex 8 - OPL 4 of 21 t F. System failure - i 1. Safety critical devices such as shutdown switches, control valve interlocks and pressure relief valves. 2. Management of change to pipeline modifications that can impact pipeline flow, surge pressures as well as the effectiveness of existing safety equipment. 3. Improper tool selection or inadequate data review of inline inspections devices. The type of defect expected must be know or suspected so that the proper ILI tools can be selected toe the inspection. Several types of tools generally have to be run in order to inspect the pipe for all of the potential types of defects. Flaws may be missed due to the j complex nature of the log interpretation. 4. SCADA breakdown, programming errors entered into the main j computer can transfer to the backup system if they are not independent of each other. For safety critical equipment, redundancy does not truly provide increased reliability if such systems can be j easily linked to the same failure (mirroring). V. TRAINING I In conjunction with Williams Pipeline, which carries natural gas, Olympic Pipeline has I conducted training classes for interested parties such as Fire and Police Departments as well as other Government Agencies. The presentations given by Olympic Pipe Line were basically considered awareness-level classes. The following is a brief summary of what was presented and discussed in the classes • Locations of the pipeline and headquarters • Construction features of the pipeline • Size and age of pipes • Location and type of block valves • Emergency response procedures for company employees responding to an emergency incident f • Types of product flowing in the pipeline and their specific hazards, vapor density, and specific gravity i • Amount of product transported through the line per day and under what pressures • Greatest risk of damage to Olympic's lines I Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 Annex B - OPL 5 of 21 VI. POTENTIAL HAZARDS TO THE ENVIRONMENT Of the four Hazard Vulnerabilities that face Kent Fire two are environmental hazards. The environmental hazards are ground contamination from a rupture of the pipeline that soaks into whatever surface that is available at that site and large scale spreading of the fuel into a water source. A. Ground Contamination Ground contamination and spread over the permeable ground surfaces, is a long-term problem. While a concern, there is little that can be done to stop or limit it unless there is a feature of the topography that lends itself to natural containment. This includes paved parking lots with curbs, streets, and natural depressions in the earth. The danger of runoff into storm drains is addressed below. B. Waterway Contamination 1. The Green River The pipeline, at the point that it crosses under the Green River, is deeply buried below the river bed. In addition, there are manual shutoffs on both banks to minimize the contamination. The chance of a rupture under the Green river is minimal due to the depth of the pipeline barring a shift of the earth. A rupture of the pipeline near the Green river that allows product to flow down the banks into the waterway is more likely. Once in the river the steep banks should help to contain the vapors that are carried along with the current and winds not allowing them to spread into the businesses and residences that line the Green River. This will help to limit the danger to an environmental one. In addition, the Olympic Pipeline Company has a plan in place for dealing with a spill into any major waterway. It includes booms and other material that will help to minimize the impact with the environment. 2. Tributaries Mill creek, which runs near Station 76, is a small, slow moving stream which starts on the East Hill of Kent. From there it flows North through the valley crossing over the pipeline several times between South 228th Street and South 180th Street where it then runs into the City of Tukwila. While slow moving, the stream, like the Green River, does create a path for flammable vapors to travel in both directions close to highly concentrated business facilities such as Matlack Incorporated and the Centerpoint Complex . In addition it lacks the rivers high banks to contain the runoff and vapors. This channeling of vapors is similar to what happened in Bellingham with over 1 mile of stream bed igniting in approximately 15 seconds and burning for over 40 minutes. Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 Annex 8 - OPL 6 of 21 I I� 3. Storm Drains P. The City of Kent has an extensive storm drain system that runs throughout the city limits. Many of the storm drains are interconnected and create an ideal path for flammable or combustible liquids as well as the resulting vapors. One of the greatest dangers to the population of Kent is that the spread of the hazard is undetectable from the surface streets until there is either an explosion or a monitoring device is lowered into the storm system. The city will not have personnel enter the storm system with such a hazard existing. The city does have inflatable plugs that can close off portions of the system if they are given sufficient warning and the work can be done safely. VII. FIRE AND EXPLOSION HAZARDS A. Aviation/Diesel Fuel In the event of a rupture of the Olympic Pipeline there are two distinct environmental hazard but a smaller danger from fire or explosion because j the flash point is four to five times as high as gasoline. This is not to say, however, that there is no chance of igniting the fuel if the conditions are correct. I B. Gasoline If the product coming from the pipeline is gasoline, the chance of an explosion is greatly increased. At some point the vapors from the fuel will reach an ignition source such as a vehicle, a piece of machinery, or any open flame. At that time the entire air/gasoline mixture will ignite and travel back to the source. If the gasoline has had a relatively extensive amount of time to spread the resulting explosion could be catastrophic. If an ignition source is reached quickly the resulting explosion could be kept to a relatively small area leaving a large fire to be dealt with. This would help to contain the problem by burning off the fuel as it emerges into the open air. Anyone caught in the explosion may not be a viable patient due extent of injury and accessibility to them. Consider declaring an MCI if there are multiple patients. PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF FUELS I Products Flash Point (°F) Flammable Auto-ignition Ran e % Temp °F Gasoline -36 1.4 - 7.4 -853 i Jet Fuel 100 - 140 0.7 - 5.0 -444 Diesel 125 - 150 1.3 - 6.0 -350 Figure 1 Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 Annex 8 -OPL 7 of 21 Most vapors are heavier than air (vapor density>1). They will spread along the ground and collect in low or confined areas (sewers, basements, tanks, ravines, etc.). All three fuels are considerably heavier than air. Consideration for topography is extremely important. Many liquids are lighter than water (specific gravity<1). They will spread over water surfaces while they continue to emit vapors. All three are lighter than and will travel with moving water increasing their mobility. If considering using foam on the surface of a water source remember to gauge the speed of the water in streams and rivers and its effects on a foam blanket. Vapor Density Specific Products Gravity (Air = 1) H2O = 1 Gasoline 4 0.7 - 0.8 Jet Fuel 6 0.81 Diesel 6 0.86 Figure 2 I I VIII. HEALTH CONCERNS Inhalation or contact with any of these products may irritate or burn skin and eyes. Fire may produce irritating and/or toxic gases. Vapors may cause dizziness or suffocation. Long term exposure to these products, especially gasoline, can lead to cancer. Whenever in contact with these products either in liquid or airborne form proper protection is necessary. For initial contact and assessment SCBAs and Bunker gear at a minimum is mandatory. Keeping upwind and uphill of the product will also offer protection. For large scale respiratory and contact distress by the public there is no preplanned solution. By definition this would be treated as a Mass Casualty Incident (MCI). Triage, treatment, and transportation areas would be arranged based on the location and type of product that had been spilled. Runoff from fire control may cause further pollution. This can offer long term health concerns due to ground saturation and leaching into sources of water. Consideration of this should be included in any type of fire fighting efforts other than rescue. i I I Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 Annex 8 - OPL 8 of 21 l Narcotic & Products Benzene* Asphyxia Skin Irritant? Hazard? Gasoline Yes Yes Moderate Jet Fuel No No Mild Diesel No No Mild Figure 3 *Benzene is a known carcinogen. Both diesel and jet fuel contain lesser amounts of Benzene. TOXIC PROPERTIES Products CO PNAs* & Particulates Gasoline VERY Significant Some Jet Fuel Significant More Diesel Significant MOST Figure 4 *Polynuclear Aromatics IX. HAZ-MAT SCENE MANAGEMENT GUIDE Scene management is divided into several phases. Scene size-up and Command and Product Identification are the first steps when faced with a possible leak or rupture and are the two that a first in officer is most likely going to have to deal with until other assistance arrives. The remaining phases will be based on what information is discovered during the first two. They are Hazard and Risk Management, Control and Confinement, and Decontamination Keep people from entering the spill site A. Scene size up and Command 1. Initial Size up ❑ Assess situation from a safe location ❑ Is this likely the Olympic Pipeline ❑ Is the product burning ❑ How much area does the product cover ❑ Which part of the Pipeline Grid System is affected (1 through 7) Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 Annex 8 - OPL 9 of 21 2. Establish Incident Command System ❑ What type of resources will be necessary to deal with the problem ❑ Establish Command Post ❑ Request operational frequency ❑ Contact Olympic Pipeline through Valley Corn ❑ Establish product type from call to Olympic Pipeline 3. Isolate area and deny entry ❑ Isolate in all directions and 1000 feet down wind ❑ Keep all unauthorized personnel out of the spill area ❑ Utilize uniform personnel to block roads B. Product Identification ❑ Identify product based upon odors and observation - Either combustible or Flammable - If unsure, treat as flammable (gasoline) ❑ Look up information in DOT guide book or as provided by CAMEO - Use guide 128 for further information - See Appendix 3 C. Hazard and Risk Management ❑ What areas can be approached safely (upwind) Warn other units of dangers - Update changes due to wind and fire p 9 ❑ Is there anyone to warn in the immediate area - Apparatus PA system - Siren Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 Annex 8 - OPL 10 of 21 1 ❑ Consider what would happen if you do nothing - Will situation get worse or stay the same ❑ Utilize the D.E.C.I.D.E. process - Detect hazardous presence - Estimate likely harm without intervention - Choose response objectives - Identify actions and options - Do the best option - Evaluate progress D. Control and Confinement ❑ Can the product be limited to a certain controllable area - At this time - Once product pool is no longer growing ❑ If the product can be safely contained - Keep out of storm drains by covering street drains - Dam banks of rivers and creeks - Consider underflow dams - Contact United States Coast Guard if near waterway ❑ If product can not be safely contained - Note where product is entering - Occupied or low lying areas - Rivers and creeks - Storm drains - Contact Coast Guard if product enters waterway Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 Annex 8- OPL 11 of 21 E. Decontamination ❑ All decontamination will be handled through E76 and HM76 and might include assistance from surrounding jurisdictions - Resources can be overwhelmed by large number of people - The Olympic Pipeline Co. has decontamination resources available X. COMBAT RESPONSE In the event of a gasoline spill, it is almost inevitable that it will reach a ignition source within a short period of time after the initial rupture. Because gasoline is carried 60% of the time, it should be assumed that the product is gasoline until confirmed otherwise by objective means or by a representative of the Olympic Pipeline. If the product is either jet fuel or kerosene it is likely that there will a large environmental disaster without a fire or explosion unless the product spills onto a preheated surface like an asphalt road on an extremely warm day. Consider the following, before taking any action. This can save lives, time, resources, and the environment. A. If product is on fire • Do not attempt to extinguish the fire until the source has been shut off • Suppress flames with a water spray or foam (see fig. 5) i - Hose lines if the area can be safely approached - Unmanned monitors if unsafe to approach or longer reach is desired - Reverse evolutions are recommended - Do not start foam operations unless you have sufficient resources B. If product is not on fire • Suppress vapors with a foam blanket if you have sufficient resources • Cover with dirt , sand, or other noncombustible material if foam is not feasible • Call in additional resources as necessary I Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 Annex 8 - OPL 12 of 21 i • Remove any potential ignition sources - Open flames - Vehicles - Machinery - Limit access to area Do not walk or allow anyone to walk through product APPLICATION CHART Monitor or Lofting from Nozzle: 0.16 gpm solution/sq. ft. spill Foam Foam Concentrate for Amount of Spill Foam Solution Concentrate at 10-minute Application (sq. ft.) (gpm) 3% Induction (gpm) (gallons) 500 80 2.4 24 1,000 160 4.8 48 2,000 320 9.6 96 5,000 800 24 240 10,000 1,600 48 480 15,000 21400 72 720 20,000 31200 96 960 50,000 8,000 240 21400 100,000 16,000 480 4,800 150,000 24,000 720 7,200 250,000 40,000 1,200 12,000 Figure 5 Note: Based on the above chart, an engine carrying 45 gallons of foam concentrate can effectively fight a fire of only 1000 (50 x 20) square feet for a 10 minute application. Note: Olympic Pipeline recommends that 10 minutes of foam application is the minimal amount necessary to effectively blanket the spill area. This is based on IFSTA standards. Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 Annex 8 -OPL 13 of 21 1. Foam Resources The following are the resources available to the Kent Fire Department for combating a fuel leak. • Kent Fire Department (class B foam) - Tender 72 has a "round the pump" foam system holding 50 gallons of concentrate in the foam tank. - All pumping apparatus have four 5 gallon buckets of foam concentrate which is mixed using a portable eductor. • Quantum apparatus have a Class "A" system that can be used on Class "B" fires (initially) for knockdown. The Class "A" foam degrades quickly and needs to be monitored for re-application.. It also WILL NOT self heal when disturbed • Outside Resources Port of Seattle Fire Department 4 Crash Trucks 410 gallons foam concentrate 3000 gallons water 1000 GPM turret guns 1000 gallons of foam in 55 gallon barrels Boeing Fire Department (Renton, Seattle, and Everett) 3 Tractor Trailers 415 gallons of foam concentrate 5000 gallons of water Olympic Pipeline Company 4 Foam Response Trailers 660 gallons of foam concentrate with master stream No water carried in trailers - depends on other source 1000 GPM turret Spare Foam 14 - 330 gallon tanks for Response Trailer In addition, The Olympic Pipeline Company has a complete list of their own contract resources to call on if necessary. 2. Other Resources Any additional resources needed on scene must be authorized by Battalion 71 prior to calling. This is at least in part to make clear who will pay for the cost of mitigating and cleaning up the leak or spill. Cityof Kent Public Works Equipment is available for use. Time and da Y of week will affect how quickly resources can be organized. Private contractors Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 Annex 8 -OPL 14 of 21 Those called specifically for a task Those who happen to be in the area of the spill at the time C. Agency Notification Phone List The following are local, state, and federal agencies that might be contacted if Necessary in the event of a spill. Each situation will dictate which agencies will need to be called. • Kent Emergency Management...................................(253) 856-4440 • Wash. State Emergency Management Division......(800) 258-5990 • WA EMD Duty Officer................................................... (253) 912-4901 • King County Emergency Management....................(206) 296-3830 • United States Coast Guard.........................................(206) 217-6232 • National Response Center...........................................1-800-424-8802 • Wash. State Dept. of Ecology...................................(425) 649-7000 • Wash. State Patrol........................................................(425) 649-4370 XI. NOTIFICATION, EVACUATION, AND SHELTERING IN PLACE In the event of a rupture and possible fire of the Olympic Pipeline being able to care for the general population of the City of Kent is the first priority. In order to accomplish, this certain preliminary steps that were discussed in the Haz-Mat Scene Management guide must be taken first so that the full magnitude of the problem can be assessed. Once that is done, how best to protect the portion of the population affected by the spill is next. This includes notifying the population of the problem and then either evacuating or sheltering them. As in all such events the greatest good for the greatest number of people is the goal. For the purposes of this manual evacuation is the voluntary removal of people from the danger area and shelter in place is the keeping of people where they are within the danger zone. A. Notification 1. The use of notification in the event of a major disaster is a necessity but at the same time creates as many problems as it solves. Given the level of traffic within the City of Kent during daylight hours, emergency evacuation could cause fatal gridlock. Mass hysteria is also a possibliby though numerous studies have shown that the public reacts in a controlled and adaptive manner in the serious situations. How fast people begin to evacuate following a warning to do so is based on how big a threat they perceive it to be. Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 Annex 8 -OPL 15 of 21 Emergency personnel need to repeat warnings frequently and emphatically. Offering warning through several different media will also help to convey the seriousness of the situation. No matter what warning system is used there are going to be both advantages and disadvantages. Obviously the more warnings that can be diseminated the greater the coverage and chance that the warning will be heeded by the public. 2. The City of Kent Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan (CEMP) allows the city to coordinate for a large scale emergencies by designating those functions that will need to be filled and who is responsible for them. Emergency Support Function 24 Evacuation, Movement, and/or Sheltering-in-Place would need to be implemented. B. Notification Methods 1. By telephone through Valley Com Certain buildings within the City of Kent have an evacuation or sheltering plan in place in the event of an emergency. These will be contacted if there is a possibility of them being impacted by the leak (see list below). All of these buildings are prearranged contacts and know the possibility of a rupture and the resulting danger. • Advantages - Initiates evacuation procedures quickly - Warns many with only a phone call - Does not endanger uniformed personnel • Disadvantages - Limited usage to those with plans in place - Buildings may not be ready for quick evacuation 2. By loudspeaker/Public Address systems (police and fire vehicles) Police and fire apparatus, can be used throughout the city. • Advantages - Covers large areas quickly - Protects uniformed personnel by keeping them in vehicles - Can be used in conjunction with other forms of warning • Disadvantages - Limits travel to streets - Not everyone in area will hear broadcast - Limited information given out - Endangers uniformed personnel if they enter hazard area - Potential ignition source in hazard area Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 Annex 8 - OPL 16 of 21 I 3. Door to door by uniformed personnel In some instances going to buildings door to door may be an option or be necessary. • Advantages (! - Face to face reassures some people - Able to give more information to those that want it - Can reach people missed in mass warnings - May discover situations that require special needs - Good for places with large numbers of people i • Disadvantages - Slow delivery system - Personnel may be hampered by those wanting help - Takes large numbers of personnel to cover large area - May expose personnel to additional fuel related danger 4. Emergency Alert System (EAS) In place for decades in some form the EAS is an effective way of warning large numbers with in a short time with minimal resources. It is broadcast over both television and radio. It begins with an audible warning which is followed by a message giving the specifics of the danger. This type of warning would be issued by the Incident Commander through the Public Information Officer (PIO). The following information must be included in the EAS 1 • Nature of problem • Evacuation routes (provided by Public Works) • Sheltering locations (provided by Parks) • Reminders to secure property Within the City of Kent the EAS is the primary means of disseminating emergency information to the public per the CEMP's Emergency Support Function #2 (ESF #2). Again, this information is distributed by the PIO through the Incident Commander or the Emergency Public Information Officer (EPIO) if the Emergency Coordination Center is activated. ESF #2 recognizes that the EAS may not be adequate for total coverage of the affected population and allows for other, before mentioned, warning methods to be used. • Advantages - Covers large areas in short time and minimal personnel - Practical from 0630 to 2200 hours when it will be heard - Most people are familiar with it and will understand it I - Can be run continuously for as long as necessary • Disadvantages - Only works where radios or televisions are on - Not effective late night to early morning - Less effective on weekends until later in morning - Frequent tests of system dulls our interest to listen Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 Annex 8 -OPL 17 of 21 C. Shelter in place 1. Shelter in place as a public protection tool has gained acceptance as a public protection tool. The goal of sheltering in place during hazardous materials accidents is to minimize the exposure of the threatened public to the dangerous chemical(s). • Advantages - Sheltering in place uses a structure and its indoor atmosphere to temporarily separate people from a hazardous outdoor atmosphere. - Sheltering in place can provide substantial protection from doses high enough to cause injury - Sheltering in place to protect the public may be preferable when the leak is very fast - Modern, energy efficient and weatherized homes provide the most effective air movement barrier • Disadvantages - The people will still be in the endangered area - Over time, small cracks in buildings will allow contaminated air to enter the indoor atmosphere - The amount of protection from sheltering in place varies mainly with the air tightness of the building 2. Currently, there is one building in Kent where certain restrictions mean a timely evacuation may not be possible and that is the Regional Justice Center. The shelter in place policy is two fold. One, The RUC can not move out several hundred inmates on short notice. They do not have either the manpower or the resources to move them en mass. Second, the RUC has a ventilation system that can be completely shut down. This closes it off completely from any outside air and would protect it from fumes that the pipeline would produce from only two or three hundred feet to the West. This shelter in place applies to only the Detention Center portion of the RJC. The Court portion would have to be evacuated like any other building. Once again, the staff of the RJC have a plan in place to move people out of the courts if necessary. One other aspect of the RJC that lends itself to self containment is the wall surrounding a large portion of the complex. This wall runs along the entire length of the West side of the property and is approximately ten feet high. Because petroleum based fuels are heavier than air, this will help to divert the fuel around the complex D. Evacuation The ideal situation would be to evacuate people prior to there being any direct threat to them. A more practical view would be that the warning, in what ever form it takes, will be after the damage has been done and the need for evacuation is immediate. Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 Annex 8 - OPL 18 of 21 i i i 1. Preplanning The following buildings have arranged to be warned by phone and have an evacuation plan in place if called ■ Kent City Hall ■ Kent Police Headquarters • Centennial Building • Kent School District schools in the affected zones ■ Renton Fire Department ■ Auburn Fire Department • Tukwila Fire Department 2. Evacuation Levels It is the responsibility of the Kent Police Department to insure the safety of the property of the evacuated population. Whenever evacuation is deemed necessary within the City of Kent the Emergency Coordination Center will need to be activated according to ESF 24. LEVEL 1 A protection WARNING has been issued for this area. i Persons are warned that current or projected threats from hazards associated with the approaching (fire, HAZMAT, tsunami, etc) are severe. • This is time for preparation, precautionary movement of persons with special needs, mobile property and pets or livestock. • You will be kept advised as conditions change. Area and radio stations have been asked to broadcast periodic updates. • If conditions worsen, we will make every attempt to locate you personally. If you are absent from your home for more then a short time, please leave a note with your name and a contact telephone number in a door or window where it can be easily seen. i i Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 Annex 8 -OPL 19 of 21 I LEVEL 2 An evacuation REQUEST has been issued for this area. Events dictate a good probability that hazards associated with the approaching (fire, HAZMAT, tsunami, etc) will severely limit our ability to provide emergency services protection. Dangerous conditions exist that may threaten residents or businesses. • You must prepare to leave at a moments notice. Fire and law enforcement personnel are working in this area to provide specific information about when to leave and the route(s) to to ke. • This may be the only notice you receive. • You will be kept advised as conditions change. Area and radio stations have been asked to broadcast periodic updates. LEVEL 3 An evacuation ORDER has been issued for this area. Current conditions present specific and immediate threat(s) to the life and safety of persons within this area. • You are ordered to immediately evacuate. Fire and law enforcement personnel are working in this area to provide specific information about when to leave and the route(s) to take. • If you choose to ignore this order, you must understand that emergency services will not be available and there is a good chance we would be unable to rescue you. Volunteers will not be allowed to enter the area to provide assistance. • You will be kept advised as conditions change. Area and radio stations have been asked to broadcast periodic updates. Shelter for the evacuated population is provided by the Parks Department with the assistance of American Red Cross as covered under ESF #6. Shelter includes the feeding, medical care, disaster information, and bulk distribution of emergency items to the victims. Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 Annex 8 - OPL 20 of 21 1 3. Evacuation Grids Evacuation procedures are broken down by a Pipeline Grid System. There are seven (7) grid areas for the Kent Valley. The grids are numbered from one (1) to seven (7) starting in the North most and moving South • The Northern boundary of the grids is South 180th / Southwest 43rd Street. • The Southern boundary is South 277th Street. t • The Western side is the West Valley highway (including 68th Avenue South and Washington Avenue). • The Eastern boundary is the Burlington Northern Railroad and 80th Avenue South. The BN rail line from South 277th Street North to South 228th Street and 80th Avenue South onward j North until South 180th Street. The reason for using two (2) Eastern boundaries is that the Burlington Northern Railway begins to converge with the pipeline North of South 228th Street. See Appendix 4 for detailed breakdown of grid system.. When faced with a rupture and spill, whether it is burning or not, at least three (3) grids should be considered for evacuation. The one in which the spill is involved, as well as the ones immediately to the North and South. Several factors should be considered when evacuating areas. Wind direction, time of day, topography, streets, and storm drain locations. If grid one (1) is where the spill located then Tukwila and Renton Fire should be notified of the potential danger to their response areas. If grid seven (7) is involved then Auburn Fire should be notified. What areas are actually evacuated will be based upon the situation at the time and the decisions made by the officers in charge. I Notifying the Incident Commander of which grids are / will be impacted will allow other Fire units as well as Police to begin the notification and evacuation process. Notifying the incoming IC also allows them to consider appropriate emergency notifications. i i i Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 Annex B - OPL 21 of 21 3 �r Ta d ,._ i � 01 �. ve" 4, �'v ". �� #.+. rim=t� ..,��� ..,� "I ' 0 Pipeline Valve Locations ,�,g Olympic I 'a �0 ,4 * t h` a. I T a as o r M v to P ��'' x 4,r'• � r m �� kt �€ .1 ` '�s� '� r5 spa -'dK k Sty a �. �rn�5'.^� ��,�,,� s' 3 �, r � naS 3� �� " a ' ��� r,� rgyte Igt3 a �� a v s d c Hand Operated Valve 20 ¢ ; MP1195 � �� s'>'W�� Operated Valve F MP1196 11 iji € 1 S Hand Operated Valve Approx So.300th and the K- 5 w' Green River West Valley Hwy. x � MP 121 5 ` �MI ' � �+ U, ' i Al vo Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 Annex 8 -Appendix One i i E Pipeline Markings 10 I I S , Y ak .1 Mfg` I Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 Annex B -Appendix Two I GUIDE FLAMMABLE LIQUIDS (Non-Polar / Water-Immiscible) POTENTIAL HAZARDS FIRE OR EXPLOSION HIGHLY FLAMMABLE: Will be easily ignited by heat, sparks or flames. • Vapors may form explosive mixtures with air. • Vapors may travel to source of ignition and flash back. • Most vapors are heavier than air. They will spread along ground and collect in low or confined areas (sewers, basements, tanks). • Vapor explosion hazard indoors, outdoors or in sewers. • Those substances designated with a "P" may polymerize explosively when heated or involved in a fire. • Runoff to sewer may create fire or explosion hazard. • Containers may explode when heated. • Many liquids are lighter than water. • Substance may be transported hot. • If molten aluminum is involved, refer to GUIDE 169. HEALTH Inhalation or contact with material may irritate or burn skin and eyes. • Fire may produce irritating, corrosive and/or toxic gases. • Vapors may cause dizziness or suffocation. • Runoff from fire control or dilution water may cause pollution. PUBLIC SAFETY CALL Emergency Response Telephone Number on Shipping Paper first. If Shipping Paper not available or no answer, refer to appropriate telephone number listed on the inside back cover. • Isolate spill or leak area immediately for at least 25 to 50 meters (80 to 160 feet) in all directions. • Keep unauthorized personnel away. • Stay upwind. • Keep out of low areas. • Ventilate closed spaces before entering. Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 Annex B-Appendix Three 1 of 8 i i PROTECTIVE CLOTHING • Wear positive pressure self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA). • Structural firefighters' protective clothing will only provide limited protection. EVACUATION Large Spill • Consider initial downwind evacuation for at least 300 meters (1000 feet). Fire • If tank, rail car or tank truck is involved in a fire, ISOLATE for 800 meters (1/2 mile) in all directions; also, consider initial evacuation for 800 meters (1/2 mile) in all directions. E I EMERGENCY RESPONSE FIRE CAUTION: All these products have a very low flash point: Use of water spray when fighting fire may be inefficient. CAUTION: For mixtures containing alcohol or polar solvent, alcohol- resistant foam may be more effective. I Small Fires • Dry chemical, CO2, water spray or regular foam. Large Fires • Water spray, fog or regular foam. • Use water spray or fog; do not use straight streams. • Move containers from fire area if you can do it without risk. i Fire involving Tanks or Car/Trailer Loads • Fight fire from maximum distance or use unmanned hose holders or monitor nozzles. r • Cool containers with flooding quantities of water until well after fire is out. • Withdraw immediately in case of rising sound from venting safety devices or discoloration of tank. • ALWAYS stay away from tanks engulfed in fire. • For massive fire, use unmanned hose holders or monitor nozzles; if this is impossible, withdraw from area and let fire burn. i Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 Annex B -Appendix Three 2 of 8 i SPILL OR LEAK • ELIMINATE all ignition sources (no smoking, flares, sparks or flames in immediate area). • All equipment used when handling the product must be grounded. • Do not touch or walk through spilled material. • Stop leak if you can do it without risk. • Prevent entry into waterways, sewers, basements or confined areas. • A vapor suppressing foam may be used to reduce vapors. • Absorb or cover with dry earth, sand or other non-combustible material and transfer to containers. • Use clean non-sparking tools to collect absorbed material. Large Spills • Dike far ahead of liquid spill for later disposal. • Water spray may reduce vapor; but may not prevent ignition in closed spaces. FIRST AID • Move victim to fresh air. • Call 911 or emergency medical service. • Apply artificial respiration if victim is not breathing. • Administer oxygen if breathing is difficult. • Remove and isolate contaminated clothing and shoes. • In case of contact with substance, immediately flush skin or eyes with running water for at least 20 minutes. • Wash skin with soap and water. • Keep victim warm and quiet. • Ensure that medical personnel are aware of the material(s) involved, and take precautions to protect themselves. Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 Annex 8 -Appendix Three 3 of 8 i Response Information Data Sheet* PRODUCT: GASOLINE General Description: Gasoline is a clear colorless to amber colored, volatile liquid with a petroleum-like odor. It has a flash point of less than 0 degrees F. it is lighter than air. Vapors from this commodity may travel to a source of ignition and then flash back to the source of the leak. (c. AAR, 1999) Physical Properties: Specific Gravity .72 to .76 @ 60 degrees F. Vapor Density 4 Flash Point -36 degrees F. LEL 1.4% UEL 7.4% Auto Ignition Temp853 degrees F. Fire Hazard: Product may travel great distances to an ignition source and flash back.(USCG, 1999) Non-Fire Response: Keep sparks, flames, and other sources of ignition away. Keep material out of water sources and sewers. Build dikes to contain flow as necessary. Attempt to stop leak if without undue personnel hazard. Use water spray to knock down vapors (c. AAR, 1999) Fire Fighting: Do not extinguish unless the flow can be stopped. Use water in flooding quantities as fog. Solid streams of water may spread fire. Cool all affected containers with flooding quantities of water. Apply water from as far a distance as possible. Use foam, dry chemical, or carbon dioxide. (c. AAR 1999) Protective Clothing: Skin - Wear appropriate personal protective clothing to prevent skin contact, Remove any clothing that becomes wet. Eyes - Wear appropriate eye protection to prevent eye contact. Wash Skin - The worker should immediately wash the skin when it becomes contaminated. (NIOSH, 1997) Health Hazard: Irritation of mucous membranes and stimulation followed by depression of central nervous system. Breathing of vapors may also cause dizziness, headache, and lack of coordination or, in more severe cases, anesthesia, coma, and respiratory arrest. If liquid enters lungs, it will cause severe irritation, coughing, gagging, pu8lmonary edema, and, later, signs of bronchopneumonia and pneumonitis. Swallowing may cause irregular heartbeat (USCG, 1999) i Reactivity: This compound is incompatible with strong oxidizers such as peroxides, nitric acid, and per chlorates. (NIOSH, 1997) i Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 Annex 8 -Appendix Three 4 of 8 First Aid: Eyes- If this chemical contacts the eyes, immediately wash the eyes with large amounts of water, occasionally lifting the lower and upper lids. Get medical attention immediately. Contact lenses should not be worn when working with this chemical. Skin- If in contact with skin, immediately flush the contaminated skin with soap and water. If this chemical penetrated the clothing, immediately remove the clothing and flush the skin with water. If irritation persists after washing, get medical attention. Breathing- If a person breathes large amounts of this chemical, move the exposed person to fresh air at once. If breathing has stopped, perform mouth to mouth resuscitation. Keep the affected person warm and at rest. Get medical attention as soon as possible. Swallow- If this chemical has been swallowed, get medical attention immediately. (NIOSH, 1997) Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 Annex 8 -Appendix Three 5 of 8 i Response Information Data Sheet* PRODUCT: KEROSENE (Jet Fuel) i General Description: Kerosene is a clear colorless fluid that when highly refined is used as jet fuel. It retains its characteristic odor. It has a flash point of over 100 degrees F. and must be heated in order to ignite. Physical Properties: Specific Gravity ..81 to .85 @ 59 degrees F. Vapor Density 6 Flash Point 100 degrees F. LEL .7% UEL 5% Auto Ignition Temp444 degrees F. Fire Hazard: Exists if product is heated to at least 100 degrees F. Fire hazard more likely on warm or hot days. j Non-Fire Response: Contain product and eliminate ignition sources. Keep I out of waterways and sewers. Fire Fighting: Water may not be effective as a fire fighting agent. Dry chemicals, foam, and carbon dioxide are recommended. Protective Clothing: Level C protection. i Health Hazard: Ingestion causes irritation of gastrointestinal tract; f pulmonary tract irritation secondary to exhalation of vapors. Aspiration causes severe lung irritation with coughing, gagging, dyspnea, substernal distress, and rapidly developing pulmonary edema, signs of bronchopneumonia, and pneumonitis appear later; minimal central nervous system depression. (USCG, 1999) Reactivity: None First Aid: Ingestion- Do not lavage or induce vomiting; call physician. Aspiration- Enforce bed rest; administer oxygen; call physician. Eyes- Wash with plenty of water. Skin- Wipe off and wash with soap and water. Breathing- Move the exposed person to fresh air and supplemental oxygen. If breathing has stopped, begin artificial respirations. i �I Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 Annex 8 -Appendix Three 6 of 8 Response Information Data Sheet* PRODUCT: DIESEL General Description: Diesel fuel is a straw yellow to dark colored liquid with a petroleum like odor. It ahs a flash point below 141 degrees F. it is lighter than water and insoluble in water. The vapors are heavier than air. (c. AAR, 1999) Physical Properties: Specific Gravity ...87 to .90 @ 68 degrees F.. Vapor Density 6 Flash Point 125 degrees F. LEL 1.3% UEL 6% Auto Ignition Temp 350 to 625 degrees F. Fire Hazard: Combustible. Will ignite if heated. Non-Fire Response: Keep sparks, flames, and other sources of ignition away. Keep material out of water sources and sewers. Build dikes to contain flow as necessary. Use water spray to knock down vapors. (c. AAR, 1999) Fire Fighting: Do not extinguish unless the flow can be stopped. Use water in flooding quantities as fog. Solid streams of water may spread fire. Cool all affected containers with flooding quantities of water. Apply water from as far a distance as possible. Use foam, dry chemical, or carbon dioxide. (c. AAR ) Protective Clothing: Avoid breathing vapors. Keep upwind. Wear appropriate chemical protective gloves, boots, and goggles. At a minimum wear Bunkers and SCBA's. wash away any material which may have contacted the body with copious amounts of water or soap and water5. (c. AAR, 1999) Health Hazard: Inhalation causes headache and slight giddiness. Ingestion causes nausea, vomiting, and cramping; depression of central nervous system ranging from mils headache to anesthesia, coma, and death; pulmonary irritation secondary to exhalation of solvent; irritation with coughing, gagging, dyspnea, substernal distress, and rapidly developing pulmonary edema; later, signs of bronchopneumonia and pneumonitis; acute onset of central nervous system excitement followed by depression. (UISCG, 1999) Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 Annex B -Appendix Three 7 of 8 i i Reactivity: This chemical is stable under normal conditions. (NTP, 1992) First Aid: Eyes- First check the victim for contact lenses and remove if present. Flush victim's eyes with water or normal saline solution for 20 to 30 minutes while simultaneously calling a hospital. Skin- If in contact with skin, immediately flush the contaminated skin with soap and water. If this chemical penetrated the clothing, immediately remove the clothing and flush the skin with water. If irritation persists after washing, get medical attention. i Breathing- Immediately flood affected skin with water while removing and isolating all contaminated clothing. Gently wash all affected skin areas thoroughly with soap and water. If symptoms such as redness or irritation develop transport to a hospital.. Inhalation- Leave the contaminated area. Take deep breaths of fresh air with supplemental oxygen. Transport if wheezing, coughing, shortness of breath, or other respiratory problems develop. j Ingestion- Don not induce vomiting. If victim is conscious and not convulsing, dilute with water. Transport immediately to a hospital. G 1 1 f All technical information and response information data sheets are taken from CAMEO -Window 1.2 and where noted. 1 i Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 Annex e -Appendix Three 8 of 8 r' Evacuation Grid Sectors i 1 MAP SHEETz R � C a t � AIL Iti f � +, 'M W .+ MW�, ' �' k - ' Y NI RN r YaI €� a 'e. a �°`�; ]z.�"9 a r 5 t 5 i .� , �ry°�g,'S s { .fie $ '� 9 �, ✓""Y' 4 j 'fil $� V_W �€ t� �Sbv . ' jI TIN ��ks a , t � iJ rb ,fr 3 - ors s t e v s 3 n, a € § 4 t IS ,�,���Ts�.,��,`'� "Al N dtI,i� .+ 6 C �� t "a BAH{tr1*�4tmq: ff'M1F & Y } ^ y� 4z VI � av ON7 Pit,Ad51 tzm za bb § ram* Hazardous Materials Response Plan 2009 Annex 8 -Appendix Four f Pthited 07105106 T SW43 S' i Stormiines Catch basins N? X Fire hydrants \ 0 Pipeline S X2, x 10 , Scale: I" 54C IW9 A 1q- 2`9 X x 26, 26 1� ��. _f � � � =`-' _ z5 J, ��I� (j..'���`,.'b�,\ 'ice s._--- .._ ._ x 2,51 0 I A U 2J.j- x x -------- [25 2 x t X 17� L—r- C; -u ;.,� x 188 ST- r 26 x 25 X 27 X2,' S 188�T x 25 ?15 26 --S 190 ST;�, 6 X- El X,74 it �, � � � 190 __ -- �B Z6 Z k,T f I �� -- 271 ((�f, xa? XIWI x 271 4 ED if 0 1, ) r X, 26 26 x x 25 o H 6 - J 29 21, plympic Pipeline 11 M, HazardRa pans& May She d I of 7 _..I ) / �� U —� )�� 1) xl� 21 Printed 07105106 Stormlines -- x x Fl.',dir—tion indicated -25 Catch basins x 99 Fire hydrants Li Scala: Y' 540' ------------ xg6 97 10)) X17 x 27 —S 198 9T— /�71 25 'ami 25 x A 17 [j Ej x........... 5, % L IT X- C) A x aU 15 (A g4 S 202 J -ST 4 I x X29 6 0 X�r \1\4' 4 25 7:7- -------S2047 -S Y f II I X27 q L-1 oCr 4 27 27F ;Z X 25 01 x S 206 ST S 06 ST El ...... x X21 x I L -S208ST J/ X2 & /P J; f C) 6 �1 t X29 0 X6 -go ----- L r 15 25 "—p x ----------I AS 212 S T- ql ri— ———— Olympic eline f Hazard Response Map x F Map Sheet 2 of 7 Printed07105 5106( Stormlines 4 Flo,direction indi—l' 212 L 25 Catch basins x Fire hydrants Pipeline Scale: 1-=546" FL x LJ Y1 x X�o 11JT X96 34 o x IL s 2 26 L 4t- - 4 1, xo2 xm 28 'k x x j 28, (-j 'Al 25 P, -- DID I A x� 220 ST' x15 )10 ED x xx? XV S, (a lo .72 L-A x X x PEI 37 R MT LL-CRj�p m xv2 32 2 11-— xy/ �2 x- Tr) x )j 14 f1—GI x if x x3y _22 .74.{ --------- x If 7 34) — - ,)— — I. I --r, -� II t -( - .1, � N 227 P1, x"M A LI S 2 2 8 x���•v----- Olympic Pipeline 14-X X33 Hazard Response MG Map Sheet 3 of 7 r—�- �i / x �6 r �/ L x r� ��, ❑ m �r di c Printed07105106 96 Jr S 238 ST .� f�i � �'' I '� ---- E3 II �-a / /iGi R --- O 9 storm lines m r —� / /� �� ( �( {I�� Fl—direction indica� ���� x - - O CI C� �J 10❑I' Cateh basins �� � -�/ //J i ( i ( ( t�- .l CLOUDY ST�6 � I — � Fire hydrants max° ? '- ��y�� � W 5 Pipeline COMMONS All, GCS Cale: y" _48 El \ CITrEL z � �� ED PLA1Ds �- C� ;1 Ll 0 7 Q y J Ind) 1 (�l Gan 1?�+ 1 _ _ I I �� L� L ❑ 98 - . L'l 1, D C - 1�� ST �x x —�_.'1 1 lam. Z. -R _-1 CJ !� ` ! 1 KENT J ll I P' ,W KENT STA'1'ION ST '.... 119 n -_- Y s� e C�I❑` Q COMMONS + -N -_ Y ❑ f 1 SAM_ METSOifAI x } t �� - is ;I,� Il / L Z �� �,• �,. RA=�\ �zl 114 R/D,';ANDEI x4l „ ( W > 41 C `s x ST,�7 TlvM JUST/CE CENTERL �� �I THA/LEH PARK. I l ! �p �@ l J r I - 1 41 y -��? FU- x474> P j SOUNDER .� ) a PARKING J { 11LJJl } �� 5 ♦ 4n1 ro_.GARAGE .ST 40 e LA - -_ -- t� W SMITH ST _ a.l i-' r "'o r ) 1 S - f LLBHAI 46 � WHARRISON�3 n 6, ♦ S�T ��_, �� 2 i -y �..1C - x h� �� f x47 - - , ❑Q ,_,I,I_�1 (� Z O t t_ ( M/LINAUMSE W HARRISON ST U 42 �.�- -'i. ❑ LVJ Lt ❑ L..1W MEEKER — - ._ --�i:� --- -- -Ll \� W W MEEKER STD_---... r-- ( l - l_.:f9, ❑-1, ? x42 if LJ L� LdcoEaE�sT (E•N/LNN/1L- '� 1�L,Jd 1-7 /i ' ,Ic,�1 F'S�[� - FIALL"x42p M I V r (1-'1"1 �•��`] _42 ❑ ' xer 4�.• �I , --'K� o=a L7LIKLNL x lq �,. I. L... L I I1 ---n 44 x41 W TITUS ST W� LL. a l Ell `' I �� ' I I__L..— x44 � ❑ 49 rt� 0 � El 1 ❑ , x47 nIf 11 4 - - ! -' --- 0 --- - W - �, PARK SAAR ST - �� a t W WILLIS ST x44( D >� n I [ 6 x41 C =— 6 4B = 46_ X4Y Mill a , 1� I�v1 U If] d Q611 L}rlU o r 49 f1 f a n�� x- �. 1 en x p,a ❑ C -- v� 4u ❑l --il x /, q{/� 1 _ r ❑_ 1 CJ r K/l l/AN/S L� �r �, = / _ -�' q JI El (h r3 �Ih cJ � A�❑ L PARK - - KIWANISPARK 1 W CROW ST fl - [' RACHAEL PL _ c n000n u! J 1 r _ V1 STA 71 - [� � ❑ C 41�P' �Lr-1�1 Ll \ �� , - •� TIC I� UOL, _ � �c Olympic Pip eCrne 11+�7� (� f0_4 Hazard Response W °1 'I rr� .� °, Map Sheet,5®f7 I I L ILI Printed 07105106 Vi ntre cl 11L X4? 44 A FD 42 Storm lines E,4: ub U) Fl—dir—tioti indicated el Catch basins x 42 Fire hydrants X W T Pipeline EEEMNK::� X44 Scale: 1- =540' X41---- U IF] 41 D L 47 E SAA, w X44 3{27 I X 4,1 W WILLIS ST— 15 2516 E), E ILLI ROOD J, Cl Ell 14 X44 " r-—' 2� D Q CyI Z�" w CROW ST 10 , 0 E 0 0 -X- 41 E" J D 45n ,43 LA ED TT a N, N 7-T m -T 43 x \v 1 4y- E� x �L— u W V -2D X44 11H kOOK ED 1) 'k, -------- r d X4-1 44 3 X X41 434 �D U) J u X46 Uri 41 X Y' I41 46 x lines ---------- 49 u X X48 N L'L D !4- 45 \v\\\\ m 40 1F x FG t X4, x X44 tit, ........... 44 x r. QD 0 Fj/\E-1 L]144-- ex,,�11 14 X48 it S 262..ST ---TT 43 P x t Ll t 41 4R, I V414. V f,4 Olympic Pipeline X47 (s �-\'—'j b 0 Hazard Response Map 4,7 �05, Map Sheet 6 of 7 x /JGf� �� l� �� \��: ` + ���v' x44 �— 1.� J �� Printed 07/05/06 $ �`, v,4 �7 6tormlinee A __l] X44 L �- `� � Flou direction iudical --.- (��`)✓ V "�� �j� I:�� Catch basins r,2! LU Fire hydrants !_ ea�.�� X4B �C] % ! Pipeline 9 ✓' ggg T44 L,E) S 262 . S1'— 9 /may If I L_1 k .X44 'g�l.,�� , ° [l )� .�r-I,, �X �A� 461 En x47 ''\ El 4,7 -� ,r X47Y( a n 4g � z -- - I o (' R 1 x Fit p 45 41 't 46 d �.J 60 J S 266 9T I�1 1 R i r I F, , - - ��... I �^ S (� (_'} _ _ _ �i l` 66 1^ I �\\$��'�S'\\ I _ x ! __ 1 —✓ ���\ T11 49 iro (44 JC 40 N _ 42 I W /(,�'\f-}/— I! _ I 34 ,r I_I l \ /\\,f�" 4J 11 - , 4sl X44 X,4fi j I I Xqs X43 ( � I / X00 l 3P �✓x- X44 tvy ' -f^ 53 �\ / ✓� ju 41 u jR)� 4 III ( CCI p x47 60 42 S 272 ST XIx Q6 I `� 4s X46 -\ a; EJ X47. 47 x47 ` 4 x40 X47 Wl �.� �y✓,: X47 �I 1/ 46 ll X49 x X4,° r. lfl cv� 6x_ G� _ `..--._J ED j V CP -.X44 47 � lf, -� (1 r X X47 _ , x ] i - �� � � � I-.c� �—� � _ 15,E '✓ „ ! Xa4 !"J45 _ \ �. X47 1 X06 `\`�;•, �1 C - L zt so --_50 -1 l�i\���-- - `_._tom_., 06 \ X >_ -�- er 50 .277 ST-= , 44 `�� Olympic Pipeline X X46 ho JZ.. `I Hazard Response Mil' Map Sheet 7 of 7 ' Kent City Council Meeting Date February 17, 2009 Category Other Business - 7A 1. SUBJECT: FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DISTRICT PARTNERSHIP 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: The Federal Way School District has approached the City to explore the idea of building a new school in conjunction with the new neighborhood park on West Hill. Staff will provide a brief overview of the project. 1 3. EXHIBITS: None 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Staff (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) ' 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? N/A Revenue? N/A Currently in the Budget? Yes No 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: ' Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds ' DISCUSSION: ACTION: REPORTS FROM STANDING COMMITTEES AND STAFF A. COUNCIL PRESIDENT � P f `V �aA i MAYOR a OPERATIONS COMMITTEE PARKS AND HUMAN SERVICES COMMITTEE Ad 2) E. PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE F. PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE'' 1 n ti� G. PUBLIC WORKS 9±f,/—Z- 14 H. ADMINISTRATIONf r� ,Jc�`J -u- � rn^'` 7��✓` 1 REPORTS FROM SPECIAL COMMITTEES S"'44 _WT KENT WA 11 H 114 QTO N OPERATIONS COMMITTEE MINUTES JANUARY 20, 2009 Committee Members Present: Debbie Raplee, Tim Clark, and Les Thomas The meeting was called to order by Tim Clark at 4:02 p.m. 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES DATED JANUARY 6,, 2009 Thomas moved to approve the minutes of the January 6, 2009 Operations Committee meeting. Raplee seconded the motion, which passed 3-0. 2. APPROVAL OF VOUCHERS DATED DECEMBER 31, 2008 Finance Director Bob Nachlinger presented the vouchers for December 31, 2008 for approval. Raplee moved to approve the vouchers dated December 31, 2008. Thomas seconded the motion, which passed 3-0. 3. RECOMMEND COUNCIL TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO SIGN THE GOVERNMENT RELATIONS CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR 2009 WITH OUTCOMES BY LEVY, IN THE AMOUNT OF $63t6OO.00 PER YEAR, PLUS AGREED UPON EXPENSES, AND UPON REVIEW BY THE CITY ATTORNEY, Community and Public Affairs Manager Michelle Witham advised that since the year 2000, the city has contracted annually with Doug Levy of Outcomes by Levy to provide services for the city of Kent, These services include the following activities: Assist with issue identification and meetings with Kent legislators prior to the Legislative Session, Continue to monitor and identify problems and opportunities for Kent on issues under consideration by various state legislative bodies including group meetings on transportation, fiscal resources, endangered species listings, and other state agency activities. Monitor and report legislation of concern to Kent during the Legislative Sessions(s), working with the Mayor's Office to provide regular status reports and to advocate for Kent on relevant issues. Assist with Issue identification, opportunities for Kent, and advocacy efforts with Kent's federal representatives. 2 Operations Committee Minutes January 20, 2009 Page: 2 Assist with pursuit of funding for Kent projects, particularly at the state and federal levels. Witham noted that Mr. Levy has proven himself to be extremely effective in advancing Kent's legislative agenda and has accumulated a great deal of expertise and knowledge regarding the issues of importance to Kent. Raplee and Thomas inquired as to how the contract amount this year compared with last year. Witham responded that the contract amount is the same. Further questions were raised by the Committee which Witham responded to. Thomas moved to recommend Council authorize the Mayor to sign the government relations consulting services agreement for 2009 with Outcomes by Levy, in the amount of $63,600.00 per year, plus agreed upon expenses, and upon review by the City Attorney. Raplee seconded the motion, which passed 3-0. 4. MOVE TO RECOMMEND COUNCIL AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO SIGN THE CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH VANNESS FELDMAN, ATTORNEYS AT LAW REPRESENTING THE CITY OF DENT AS OUR FEDERAL LOBBYIST, NOT TO EXCEED $90,000, "SUBJECT TO FINAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS ACCEPTABLE TO THE CITY ATTORNEY." Economic Development Director Ben Wolters explained that the agreement with VanNess Feldman, Attorneys at law will be providing the City of Kent federal representation with a particular emphasis on the Washington State Congressional delegation. This contract with VanNess Feldman, Attorneys at law will not exceed $90,000. The expenses incurred will be split between Economic Development and Public Works Department. Wolters further noted that VanNess will provide representation for funding for this year reauthorization of the Federal Transportation Reauthorization bill and the yearly discretionary appropriations bills for key grade separation and other transportation projects for Kent. Continued policy support for replacing the Green River levee system and a reasonable interim flood zone and flood insurance program. Also Federal funding and regulatory policy support for the Green/Duwamlsh Rivers Ecosystem Restoration and to restore Human Service and Community Development block grant funding and other federal opportunities and issues as they arise. Questions were raised by the Committee 1, which Wolters responded to. Raplee moved to recommend Council authorize the Mayor to sign the consultant services agreement with VanNess Feldman, Attorneys at Law representing the City of Kent as our Federal Lobbyist, not to exceed $90,000, ""subject to final terms and conditions acceptable to the City Attorney." Thomas seconded the motion, which passed 3-0. 5. MOVE TO RECOMMEND APPROVING THE 2009 YEARLY AGREEMENT WITH KENT DOWNTOWN PARTNERSHIP 3 Operations Committee Minutes January 20, 2009 Page: 3 Economic Development Director Ben Wolters noted that this yearly contract with Kent Downtown is the same as In 2008 (DBA Kent Downtown Partnership) $33, 600.00. Wolters further noted that KDP provides direct serviced to increase economic development of the Kent downtown core. Service under this agreement include but are not limited to; Hosting events, marketing downtown properties, fagade improvements program, developing an improvement plan for downtown sidewalks, street trees, light posts and to encourage businesses and developers to locate in downtown Kent. Questions were raised by the Committee which Wolters and Chief Administrative Officer John Hodgson responded to. Thomas moved to recommend approving the 2009 yearly agreement with Kent Downtown Partnership. Raplee seconded the motion, which passed 3-0. Their adjourn atat 4:18-P,m. v Nancy Clary .t Operations C mittee Secirrvy 1 PLANNING & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MINUTES JANUARY 12, 2009 Committee Members Chair Elizabeth Albertson, Jamie Danielson, Tim Clark Albertson called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. Approval of Minutes Danielson MOVED and Clark SECONDED to approve the Minutes of December 1, 2008. Motion CARRIED 3-0. SCENIC FALL NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT Neighborhood Program Coordinator Toni Azzola stated that the neighborhood program is an initiative to foster better communication between residents in a specific geographic area and City government. Azzola stated that the underlying objective of the program is to provide avenues for residents to work together and enhance livability in their neighborhoods. Azzola introduced the neighborhood association president and acknowledged the neighborhood's efforts to address traffic calming issues. Azzola stated that Kent City Council adopted Resolution No. 1776 on January 15, 2008 recognizing the Scenic Hill Neighborhood. Since that time, the neighborhood changed its boundaries to include the South Scenic Hill neighborhood (previously unrecognized) extending its southern boundary from the area bounded by Scenic Hill Elementary School and Hillcrest Cemetery to the area bounded by 104th Avenue SE. Azzola stated that Resolution No. 1776 is being brought before the Committee for amendment in order to expand those boundaries. Clark MOVED to recommend that Council adopt the proposed Resolution acknowledging expanded boundaries of the Scenic Hill Neighborhood formerly recognized by the Kent City Council through adopted Resolution No. 1776. Danielson SECONDED the Motion. Motion CARRIES 3-0. Envision Midway Project Update Members of the Des Moines Finance and Economic Development Committee staff and of the Kent Planning and Economic Development Committee staff introduced themselves describing why they chose to be involved with this project. Des Moines Mayor Bob Sheckler, Council Members Scott Thommason and Carmen Scott along with Kent Council Members Tim Clark, Jamie Danielson, and Elizabeth Albertson took part in a joint meeting to discuss the Envision Midway Project. PEDC Minutes January 12, 2009 Page 1 of 2 2 I I 'Kent Planner Gloria Gould-Wessen along with Des Moines Planning Manager Denise Lathrop gave a presentation on various aspects of the Envision Midway Project with Kent's Employment Manager Jed Aldridge facilitating the discussion. Gould-Wessen stated that an updated scenario for the area would move forward with a community meeting, move this on through Kent's Land Use and Planning Board, Planning & Economic Development Committee and on to City Council, hopefully by March. I Adjournment Chair Albertson adjourned the meeting at 7:00 p.m. i Pamela Mottram Planning Services Secretary_,., S:\Permlt\Plan\PEDC\2009\Mlnutes\011209_PEDCmin.docx I I+ 1 I I i PEDC Minutes January 12, 2009 Page 2 of 2 i • KENT WASHINOTON CITY OF KENT PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES January 13, 2009 COMMITTEE MEMBERS: Les Thomas, Jamie Danielson, and Ron Harmon, Chair • The meeting was called to order by Chair Ron Harmon at 5:09 PM. 1. Approval of Minutes L. Thomas moved to approve the minutes of the December 2, 2008 meeting. The motion was seconded by J. Danielson and passed 3-0. 2. FY2009 Department of Justice Weed and Seed Program continuation funding application - AUTHORIZE Chief of Police Steve Strachan introduced Research and Development Analyst Debra LeRoy who explained the purpose of the application for the third year of the program. J. Danielson moved to authorize the Kent Police Department to apply for the FY2009 Department of Justice Weed and Seed Program continuation funding. The motion was seconded by L. Thomas and passed 3-0. 3. King County Public Entity Services Contract 2009 - AUTHORIZE Chief Strachan reviewed the purpose of the one year contract. L. Thomas moved to recommend that Council authorize the City of Kent to enter into Contract #D38698D with King County, place this item on the Consent Calendar of the January 20, 2009 Council Meeting, and that the Mayor be authorized to sign said contract. The motion was seconded by J. Danielson and passed 3-0. 4. Police Special Investigations Unit update - INFO ONLY Chief Strachan provided an update on the focus and progress of the Special Investigations Unit (SIU). S. Police Alarm Response Protocol - INFO ONLY Chief Strachan and Deputy Chief Mike Painter distributed a document to committee members regarding a proposal to implement a hybrid verified response protocol to intrusion alarms. Chair Harmon asked that an update be provided to the Committee at the beginning of the second quarter of the year. 6. Police Crime Suppression meetings - INFO ONLY Chief Strachan explained the type of information shared at the meetings and distributed copies of a 3-week statistical summary of crimes in the City. Chief Strachan reported that the Neighborhood Response Team (NRT) has been in service for one year, as well as the Rental Housing Ordinance which was developed with the assistance of Deputy City Attorney Pat Fitzpatrick. Chief stated that a second Automated License Plate Reader is now in use. L. Thomas gave kudos to the police department for the efficient traffic flow at the ShoWare events. The meeting adjourned at 6:30 PM. Jo Thompson, Public Safety Committee Secretary PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEEMINUTES of 1 January 26, 2009 Committee Members Present: Committee Chair Deborah Ranniger was absent. Tim Clark sat in on her behalf and committee member Debbie Raplee assumed the committee chair. Committee Member Ron Harmon was present. The meeting was called to order at 5:04 p.m. Due to the special meeting there were no additional items added to the agenda. However, the order of the meeting was changed as noted below. ITEM 1 - Approval of Minutes Dated January 5, 2009: Committee Member Clark moved to approve the minutes of January 5, 2009. The motion was seconded by Harmon and passed 3-0. ITEM 2 - Ordinance Amending KCC 9.38.170 Residential parking Zone/North Park Neighborhood: Neighborhood Program Coordinator, Toni Azzola summarized that Kent City Code 9.38.170 was recently enacted to create a Residential Parking Zone (RPZ) in the North Park Neighborhood make it illegal to park without city-issued parking permits. She noted the permits are available only to RPZ property owners, residents, residents' visitors and government vehicles not associated with the conduct of business at the Kent Events Center. The amendment is necessary to allow city contractors, their subcontractors and employees doing work, to park in the neighborhood when necessary. The amendment allows the RPZ Manager to issue permits for this purpose. Azzola showed what the Parking Permits look like. Harmon moved to recommend that Council adopt the amendment to Kent City Code provision 9.38.170, in a form similar to that presented to the Committee, which would allow city contractors to be issued permits to park in Residential Parking Zones while engaged in work for the City. The motion was seconded by Clark passed 3-0. ITEM 3 7 - Downey Farmstead Restoration Proiect/Salmon Recovery Funding Board - Agreement: Environmental Engineering Manager, Mike Mactutis stated that the Downey Farmstead Restoration Project involves four parcels totaling 21.81 acres located along the left bank of the Green River from River Mile 21.7 to 22.2. This restoration project will increase access to floodplain habitat for Chinook and other salmonids and restore floodplain functions. Funds from this grant would be used for feasibility study and 30% design of the Downey Farmstead Restoration Project. The City will be reimbursed $150,000 by the Salmon Recovery Funding Board after the City of Kent spends its funds for this project. Clark moved to recommend for the Mayor to sign the Salmon Project Agreement with the Salmon Recovery Funding Board (SRFB) in the amount of $150,000, direct staff to accept the grant, and establish a budget for the funds to be spent within the Downey Farmstead Restoration Project, upon concurrence of the language therein by the City Attorney and the Public Works Director. The motion was seconded by Harmon and passed 3-0. PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE 2 January 2 , 2009 ITEM 4 3- Local Hazardous Waste Management Program (LHWMP) - Contract Amendment: Environmental Engineering Manager, Mike Mactutis noted that the Seattle/King County Health Department Local Hazardous Waste Management Program Grant is used to fund collection of hazardous waste at special recycling collection events for residents and businesses. This contract agreement is to distribute 2009 grand funds to the City to implement the City's 2009 LHWMP tasks as described in the Scope of work in the grant agreement. It was noted that pharmaceuticals and computers cannot be dropped off at their collection events. They are collected under a different program. Clark move to recommend authorization for the Mayor to sign an amendment to r the Local Hazardous Waste management Program Contract Agreement for 2008/2009 in the amount of $24,413.91, direct staff to accept the grant and establish a budget for the funds to be spent within said project upon concurrence of the language therein by the City Attorney and the Public Works Director. The motion was seconded by Harmon and passed 3-0. ITEM 6 4 - Information Only/January Flood Event: Environmental Engineering Manager, Mike Mactutis briefed the committee through a series of aerial photographs that were taken just after the storm. Information Only No Motion Required ITEM 6 5 - Ordinance Amending Flood Hazard Regulations: Environmental Engineer, Beth Tan explained that city staff has worked to ensure Kent City Code 14.09 meets with standard language provided by federal and state agencies to participate in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). A number of minor items within the existing 14.09 code, from definitions to additional wording, were included in a letter of correction sent by the state representative of Floodplain Management from the Washington Department of Ecology (DOE). City staff is also recommending three additional changes to KCC 14.09 which include 1) Addition of Section 14.09.175, compensatory storage 2) Proposal to change the requirement of finish floor elevations to be a minimum of two j feet above base flood elevation. 3) Adopt the King County River and Floodplain Management Division map dated March 2008 or the latest Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM). Harmon move to recommend authorization for the Mayor to sign the ordinance to revise Kent City Code 14.09 Flood Hazard Regulations, upon concurrence of the language therein by the City Attorney and Public Works Director. The motion was seconded by Clark and passed 3-0. ITEM -7 6 - Northwest Hydraulic Consultants/Analysis of Levee Alternatives - Contract: Environmental Engineering Manager, Mike Mactutis noted that FEMA is in the process of updating the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMS) for the Green River Valley. The City along with other Valley Cities participated in an appeal of the Preliminary FIRMS. j Mactutis further explained the reason for the drastic increase in the status of the Green River Levees. The City is investigating alternative solutions to reconstruct the Green River Levees. I Northwest Hydraulics Consultants performed the modeling and prepared the documentation for the FEMA appeal and is able to investigate the technical merits of I PUBLIC ITT of 3 January 26, 2009 alternative levee configurations. The proposed contract would provide for them to assist the City in that effort. Clark moved to recommend authorization for the Mayor to sign a contract with Northwest Hydraulic Consultants not to exceed $49,802 to conduct analyses of levee alternatives to reduce the negative effects of recent FEMA mapping of potential flooding in the Lower Green River Valley, subject to terms and conditions acceptable to the City Attorney and Public Works Director. The motion was seconded by Harmon and passed 3-0. ITEM 8 — Information Only/ meeting Montessori Plus School — Meeting Set: Public Works Director, Larry Blanchard reminded committee members that an Open House will be held Wednesday, January 28, 2009 from 5:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. at the Montessori Plus School located at 23807 98th Avenue South. The purpose of the meeting is to get input from residents in the immediate neighborhood regarding two proposals the Montessori Plus School has submitted; 1) to increase hours of operation for training purposes 2) increase parking by approximately nine (9) spaces. City staff and a representative from the Montessori Plus School will be available to answer questions. Information Only/No Action Required ITEM 9 — Update/SE 256th Street Project: Design Engineering Supervisor, Mark Madfai briefed the committee through a series of photographs on the SE 256th Street Project. The committee recommended that staff proceed with sending an informational packet to the property owners along S. 256th regarding the formation of a Local Improvement District to fund a portion of the project. Information Only/No Action Required ITEM 10 — Information Only/ Traffic Calming Program (RTCP): Deputy Public Works Director Tim Laporte and Public Works Director, Larry Blanchard noted that staff is working on revising the Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program. The name has been modified to better reflect what it does. Staff has evaluated several programs from other jurisdictions and has come to a consensus. Public Works Director, Larry Blanchard stated that one of the items we are looking at in the revised RTCP is some "what ifs". What if the study that was conducted doesn't warrant changing anything? For instance - adding speed humps or traffic circles, but the residents request that these traffic calming devices be installed, the question then is, should property owners pay if the criterion isn't met? Should they pay all or a portion of the cost to have revisions made? This item will be brought back to the Public Works Committee at the special meeting that will be held (due to the Presidents Day Holiday) on Monday, February 23, 2009. Information Only/No Action Required Adjourned• The meeting was adjourned at 6:43 p.m. Cheryl Viseth, Public Works Committee Secretary r CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS A. (aq) �Le - r �'YV r a , 4,0 , cam. _ :'Le�z_a��� - - CO P _ .. 1 r r r r r r EXECUTIVE SESSION 7� s 6 'i 7 Ile ccT-yLr/`eiyt ACTION AFTER EXECUTIVE SESSION 1 � 1 i 1 i 1 I 1 i