Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
City Council Meeting - Council - Agenda - 10/21/2008
vill ti ,t i 41 Vryi. s"e i� ; T,, Illls N: Y) �� N (Aty , of Kel It ���S J6, r„,yr- x w � M,l fly cou ,P I `{p j( k -11 $�i(�t W� 5 P( a l;l��l'��II�IyI�IIIIi�;? III' �g,,", � �I'"7I1ja', 11111 �q,E I " il,� 11,,6, i 1 ��t� '�a�6 i �D� �iti US �155 W, 1 '��a"li , All "�t I i t =^° �''�'�rr it`pyy1 l;l(IE��, Milo tiai October 21 2888 er .t May©r Suzette Coke Debbie Ra lee Council Presideilt j Councilmembers Elizabeth Albertson Ron Harm''on Tim Clark Deborah R nni er Jamie Danielsen Les Thomas,' EAST IV 311I NOTON i City Clerk's Office KENT CITY COUNCIL AGENDAS 11� KENT October 21, 2008 WASHINOTON Council Chambers MAYOR: Suzette Cooke COUNCILMEMBERS: Debbie Raplee, President Elizabeth Albertson Tim Clark Jamie Danielson Ron Harmon Deborah Ranniger Les Thomas ********************************************************************** SPECIAL COUNCIL WORKSHOP AGENDA 5:00 D.M. Item Description Speaker Time 1. 2009 Budget Bob Nachlinger 90 minutes COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA 7:00 p.m. 1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE 2. ROLL CALL 3. CHANGES TO AGENDA A. FROM COUNCIL, ADMINISTRATION, OR STAFF B. FROM THE PUBLIC - Citizens may request that an item be added to the agenda at this time. Please stand or raise your hand to be recognized by the Mayor. 4. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS A. Public Recognition B. Community Events C. Human Services Report 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. 2009 Operating Budget B. 2009-2014 Capital Improvement Plan and Comprehensive Plan Amendments C. 2008 Tax Levy for 2009 Budget D. Kent Comprehensive Plan and Kent City Code Chapter 12.13 Amendments, School District Capital Facilities Plans - Impact Fees 6. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Minutes of Previous Meeting - Approve B. Payment of Bills - Approve C. Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program - Set Date for Public Hearing D. Skyline Park Apartments Sewer Easement Surplus and Release - Set Date for Public Hearing (Continued) COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA CONTINUED E. Weatherly Inn/Lake Meridian Outlet Project Easement - Authorize F. South 228th Street Corridor South 231st Way Military Road to 64th Avenue South (Hill Climb) - Accept as Complete G. Bill of Sale, Lee Short Plat - Accept H. Bill of Sale, Roytberg Short Plat - Accept I. Bill of Sale, Kent/Des Moines Park & Ride Expansion - Accept J. 2008 Non-Represented Classification and Compensation Study Appeals Phase - Approve K. Police Department Firing Range Targeting System Agreement - Authorize L. Cell Phone Recycling Program to Benefit Domestic Violence Victims - Establish and Amend Budget M. Modular Space Corporation Purchasing Agreement - Authorize N. Pierce County Emergency Management Memorandum of Agreement - Authorize O. Western Peterbilt, Inc. Purchasing Agreement - Authorize P. Kentucky Trailer Technologies Purchasing Agreement - Authorize Q. Drug Free Communities Support Grant Award - Accept R. Sex Offender Verification Grant - Accept and Establish Budget S. State Farm Insurance Company Grant - Accept T. Comprehensive Plan Environmental Impact Statement - Authorize U. Police Department Low Slope Re-Roofing Project - Accept as Complete V. Nursery Facility Retaining Wall Project - Accept as Complete 7. OTHER BUSINESS A. Cottage Housing Demonstration Ordinance - Adopt 8. BIDS None 9. REPORTS FROM STANDING COMMITTEES, STAFF AND SPECIAL COMMITTEES 10. CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS 11. EXECUTIVE SESSION AND AFTER EXECUTIVE SESSION A. Labor Negotiations B. Property Acquisition 12. ADJOURNMENT NOTE: A copy of the full agenda packet is available for perusal in the City Clerk's Office and the Kent Library. The Agenda Summary page and complete packet are on the City of Kent web site at www.ci.kent.wa.us. An explanation of the agenda format is given on the back of this page. Any person requiring a disability accommodation should contact the City Clerk's Office in advance at (253) 856-5725. For TDD relay service call the Washington Telecommunications Relay Service at 1-800-833-6388. 6i L C ro L C pro >,O H QO L aoo �O E. E cu - c °-° 3 v ro c p N o c d c �Na o v ° = v aDv roa ° N OD ro C C O/ ro}� b0 aJ ro N � U� C C 'NO v � N f0 -° " ye, v roN rows OD � >1 a N ro° a vUs Q u—°ro E Ey aQi vs %c ° v °aaui -L�SL� a N�a » E U c a+ o CpJ — c oo= ro w N c c o > o > o o f E c c� s u v >' -aE ° off s vV = v aY L p L aJ 3 N E • � c� c TL. TTNov uovN `o ° o ro ro aow c v a = c O_ TN N o O pm a a >a -c Ea ° ro cY— v °� L N o > > v ro c "0? U p c u o �— ro u ° �' NCc T N�v-tL :^ o c > p vy i ro N A 3 O S N a N Q N< v O c ao N v U e c p N v v E c >° a o c�c c L E m 3 5 E ° c • oo dN s 'cu- °-° 4OY ° ° E � oEo Euyao2 E 'c Q is �Qm � �D.L �� �U raa 2co ac �' c °.S °uu �' �2 UE o v H v y � o W ,u o'> ro� E e s E o�v A c v v c v c c v U a cEv^ ro- - � v � E c ° °Yo� co o N a ro o °U•V b N C 7 7 N U C NO b=0 E. vw? V— O O ��, C O L O c c u> .3 o ^a E ° ❑ N U L ua y ro E a E V N E c l 0 c —.c3sE E o a°'QY - � :' y s � ° y mad o crop my a c o u Q, ro c E o a u `J N c o o = c N a vop o ° E ° N mU�Y O u v o � y- 01U N i p ,°p U E roT,u � out o f oc. ce p ° u v E c N_ E s . R E Y s a a E vi.-L = L � a EU °N W °'s w v b V N°s o E o o v o e m ro NU^ a EU E a 2 v 0� o o a c3N o N u = sc 112Q- rc U . c > cc c vv � c �_. _Y � � � >uroo � cvb Ewa �°,J �p� O O U L C V C F- O M W C C-p D M ro °"Q L V E ` ro 7 b N a C O'6 O ° �. v N a • ^ ca F" NE-1 � N� EE o �,c�aNE� 3 " �a= 2ro-0 C�K � ° mac c U N '� = N via C N ` O N �' ro Y C ro E y C ro ro Q �a Q w C~ p p ro a fE O i fNa ro O-•V W U E N N L 3 ❑.E ro OU O Y O b A cc:7L M C L raa N V�f Q N ro Q•VLN � uc- pE �o � cc - camEEy `V E � '�°- � Now-4 -a " uy u2 � v �s v m u c m� ac > >-p o ° � o 0 0 E E o v v v N v N E v E c m a3 v Q L ° E oL v u V UU A U� roHiU U Oo� aC1w L ro o HU . N� haw -� a�� acc� i � y �=o 1 E oz. Z N • Laa Uoo E o E v o u v V 'UMn Y V 0 7 V — U2ILL Q C uM1 O a tij T o E v u `y roL M N N W LLI �V a - V� c roa O V = ° T `_ S coo ° E cro o E U u- .--N Y Y 0]cb G V U d W < W C N T ro L L p O C O = L ^ N u(:i p = L Q 'o O O CL m 0) �: cu u N E N 3 v ° s ro n c v V > o mro ro c � oo � E � aVL roc � a � • - ocac v ro 20 ; a v aE N rosro °u a Eco U. C—° ° E `° ro_°M ow • U O O U E 7 T OV > T.0 EO U 3 bOiD J O C~ r� N v N N O O L U L C fO T Y C C ro T?: E 3 yp 00 a Vo Q N v a°Q) 3 To N c to 3 0 o cb�� a 7 C E 3 p , C O O C C ';fl N C C G1 N C ° O - d C C O 3 T- ro N Lp E N a�0 N Luza ° `-'a ° ° v ro Emo'� Ty v•c' vvo ° ° ra = a°ua� v � v�i 20 m 2 a aoa't LAi varo QV > d E � E as Q r>c0 Q mU��cn COUNCIL WORKSHOP 1) 2009 Budget MEMORANDUM Date: October 16, 2008 To: Council President Debbie Raplee Kent City Council Members From: Mayor Suzette Cooked Re: Supplemental Budget Information At the October 7tn City Council workshop, there were a number of questions requiring staff follow-up. Attached is the information relating to the questions that were asked. The questions and referenced pages are as follows: Page 1 How much revenue will the increased development permit fees generate for the year? How much revenue would be generated on a quarterly basis? What is the impact if we delay implementation? How much revenue will the utility rates generate on an annual basis? How much revenue would be generated on a quarterly basis? What is the monthly cost increase to a resident? What is the impact if the master- planned projects are delayed? What is the total revenue generated by the permit fee and utility rate increases? Pages 2 through 4 Where do the Criminal Justice Fees come from? How many FTEs are funded by this revenue? Page 5 Please list the current unfilled positions as of October 8, 2008. Please feel free to contact myself, John Hodgson or Bob Nachlinger prior to Tuesday, October 21, regarding any questions you may have on this information or any other questions relating to the 2009 Budget. r t Total new revenue increased fees generate: Page 1 2008 Fee Increase Homeowner Costs Budgeted Revenue Annual Avg Quarterly Annually Monthly A. Permit Community Development 2,691,510 411,988 102,997 $0.00 $0.00 Public Works 2,547,547 388,104 97,026 $0.00 $0.00 Fire 874,908 121,902 30,476 $0.00 $0.00 6,113,965 921,994 230,499 $0.00 $0.00 B. Water Increase to Base Rate 8,173,943 216,630 54,158 $9.48 $0.79 System Development Charge 780,227 1,158,715 289,679 $0.00 $0.00 8,954,170 1,375,345 343,836 $9.48 $0.79 C. Drainage Increase to Base Rate 7,405,118 450,972 112,743 $4.32 $0.36 Increase for NPDES requirements* 2,277,464 569,366 $25.56 $2.13 Increase for Green River levee repair 278,000 69,500 $3.12 $0.26 7,405,118 3,006,436 751,609 $33.00 $2.75 System Development Charge 173,394 863,502 215,876 $0.00 $0.00 7,578,512 3,869,938 967,485 $33.00 $2.75 22,646,647 6,167,277 $42.48 $3.54 * New Federal Requirement A. Delay in the fee increase would mean a quarterly reduction in the revenue of the General Fund causing a reduction in service levels and likely staff layoffs. With no fee increases the annual subsidy to development would increase from its historical percentage of 18% to 28%. B. WHAT IS THE PROBABLE IMPACT OF NOT IMPLEMENTING A WATER RATE INCREASE IN 2009? 1. It could delay the design and constuction of the East Hill pressure zone project; thereby violating of our water system plan; and may result in a lower fire insurance rating for that area of East Hill. 2. It could eliminate annual infrastructure replacement projects that are vital to the operation and maintence of the water system, including hydrants, meters and pipelines. 3. Violation of Department of Health (DOH) requirements for fire water pressure, water storage and domestic water pressure and could lead to DOH intervening, subjecting us to fines, administrative oversight and lawsuits. 4. With a reduction in Capital Projects there would be the potential of program cuts, primarily in the Capital Projects area. Loss of engineers would increase design costs up to 100% for contracting the work. 5. Will require raising water rates even higher in future years to compensate for the revenue loss in 2009 to meet the requirements of the Water System Plan. 6. It would delay the Rock Creek Mitigation Projects required under our Habit Conservation Plan for Clark Springs. C. WHAT IS THE PROBABLE IMPACT OF NOT IMPLEMENTING A DRAINAGE SYSTEM RATE INCREASE IN 20097 1. Would not be able to begin the design of the flood storage projects along Mill Creek identified in the Drainage Master Plan that in turn would continue the annual flooding in this area. 2. In the event the Feds or State generate some funding for reconstructing the levees along the Green River, matching funds would not be available. 3. Would violate the conditions of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. Violation of the NPDES permit could engage DOE in enforcement that could Include fines, administrative oversight and lawsuits. 4. With a reduction in Capital Projects there would be the potential of program cuts, primarily in the Capital Projects area. Loss of engineers would double the design costs by contracting the work. 5. It will require raising drainage rates even higher in future years to compensate for the revenue loss in 2009 to meet the requirements of the Drainage Master Plan. 6. Would eliminate the City's share of the Riverview Park Project used to create a side channel for salmon along the Green River, and place grant funds in jeopardy. 7. Would delay the Lake Meridian Outfall Improvement Project for Soos Creek Basin Improvements. Report on the Distribution of Criminal Justice Funds within King County Page 2 for the years 2002 - 2006 Entity 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 i King County $12,988,932 $12,054,054 $11,026,404 $10,390,862 $10,485,285 Seattle 13,121,162 12,282,040 11,396,182 10,802,953 10,874,436 Bellevue 2,617,556 2,456,320 2,285,673 2,227,547 2,179,769 Federal Way 1,953,822 1,817,981 1,648,046 1,601,245 1,598,686 Kent 1,933,796 1,792,090 1,662,475 1,609,791 1,579,770 Renton 1,311,656 1,196,468 1,096,428 1,025,048 986,344 Shoreline 1,189,798 1,111,985 1,035,325 1,013,805 1,019,421 Redmond 1,078,909 994,666 912,768 876,576 868,562 Auburn 1,046,335 955,371 880,591 851,933 839,092 Kirkland 1,036,737 965,661 895,921 871,778 873,419, Sammamish 875,691 770,841 705,466 659,878 659,501 Bothell 605,735 557,973 469,067 484,383 486,093 Burien 709,645 667,273 625,864 605,618 607,405 Des Moines 571,756 561,829 564,850 Seatac 569,743 529,848 492,825 482,058 484,321 Mercer Island 494,314 462,283 431,004 383,606 419,249 Kenmore 437,166 404,185 376,981 365,160 358,565 Issaquah 474,919 327,017 296,677 247,122 Maple Valley 404,984 343,252 308,850 286,340 278,417 Tukwila 387,761 363,493 338,302 328,797 328,795 Covington 389,306 335,156 325,377 275,667 264,553 Lake Forest Park 288,497 269,246 250,339 244,836 245,957 Enumclaw 253,597 235,301 218,728 213,137 213,345 Woodinville 229,801 209,051 194,597 178,696 175,752 Newcastle 176,581 163,359 156,212 149,132 Snoquaimie 143,796 107,740 93,950 Normandy Park 144,702 134,939 124,580 121,751 122,225 Pacific 129,775 118,764 110,258 104,694 Duvall 126,798 116,912 107,204 98,810 92,742 North Bend 106,175 98,253 91,889 90,148 90,738 Black Diamond 92,464 84,337 78,439 76,440 76,617 Medina 66,402 62,304 58,314 57,306 57,058 Clyde Hill 63,002 58,825 55,565 55,116 55,340 Algona 60,283 54,924 50,853 48,072 47,706 Carnation 43,059 39,954 37,403 36,638 Yarrow Point 21,756 20,873 19,709 19,229 19,273 Hunts Point 10,198 9,487 8,887 8,662 8,682 Beau Arts Village 6,731 6,325 5,930 5,616 5,916 Skykomish 4,759 4,427 4,123 4,093 4,102 Total $45,419,762 $42,196,200 $39,456,109 $37,187,692 $37,404,878 Total FTEs budgeted to be paid out of Criminal Justice Funds: Page 3 FTE Count Title Law 8.85 1.00 CHIEF PROSECUTING ATTORNEY 1.00 CRIME VICTIM COORDINATOR&ADVOCATE 1.00 DOMESTIC VIOLENCE&CRIME VICTIMS COORD. 0.80 LEGAL SECRETARY 1 0.80 LEGAL SECRETARY 1 1.00 LEGAL SECRETARY 1 1.00 LEGAL SECRETARY 1 0.25 PROSECUTING ATTORNEY 1.00 PROSECUTING ATTORNEY 1.00 PROSECUTION PARALEGAL 8.85 8.85 Police 2 - Investigations 1.00 EVIDENCE CUSTODIAN 1.00 EVIDENCE TECHNICAN SUPERVISOR 14 - Patrol 1.00 POLICE PATROL OFFICER- N83 COPS U2 1.00 POLICE PATROL OFFICER 1.00 POLICE PATROL OFFICER 1.00 POLICE PATROL OFFICER 1.00 POLICE PATROL OFFICER 1.00 POLICE PATROL OFFICER 1.00 POLICE PATROL OFFICER-WSCJTC 1.00 POLICE PATROL OFFICER- N83 COPS U2 1.00 POLICE PATROL OFFICER 1.00 POLICE PATROL OFFICER 1.00 POLICE PATROL OFFICER-COPS U3 1.00 POLICE PATROL OFFICER 1.00 POLICE SERGEANT 1.00 POLICE SERGEANT 2 - Drug Task Force 1.00 POLICE TASK FORCE OFFICE MGR 1.00 POLICE SERGEANT 18 18.00 26.85 26.85 1%%.VV VL.J.Z.JZV. /1\,.I41LIV1 IG I JGIGJ CAI IU u.7G LUA Ivl %A 111111 IGI JUJIR.G 1JUI I/VJGJ - I\G... ruyG J. VI J. Inside the Legislature RCWs>Title 82>Chapter 82.14>Section 82 14 340 82 14 330 « 82 14 340>> 82 14 350 Find Your Legislator 0 Visiting the Legislature RCW 82.14.340 CAgendas, Schedules Additional sales and use tax for criminal justice purp and Calendars Referendum — Expenditures. 1 L�Bill Information =Laws and Agency Rules The legislative authority of any county may fix and impose a sales and use tax in accordance L�Legislative Committees of this chapter, provided that such sales and use tax is subject to repeal by referendum, usin procedures provided in RCW 82.14 036.The referendum procedure provided in RCW 82 14, Legislative Agencies exclusive method for subjecting any county sales and use tax ordinance or resolution to a rei Legislative Information Center The tax authorized in this section shall be in addition to any other taxes authorized by law collected from those persons who are taxable by the state pursuant to chapters 82.08 and 82 E]E-mail Notifications the occurrence of any taxable event within such county. The rate of tax shall equal one-tenth (Listserv) of the selling price(in the case of a sales tax)or value of the article used(in the case of a usl Students'Page When distributing moneys collected under this section,the state treasurer shall distribute 0 History of the State the moneys to the county in which the tax was collected The remainder of the moneys collet Legislature section shall be distributed to the county and the cities within the county ratably based on pol determined by the office of financial management In making the distribution based on popull county shall receive that proportion that the unincorporated population of the county bears to Outside the Legislature population of the county and each city shall receive that proportion that the city incorporated bears to the total county population Congress-the Other Moneys received from any tax imposed under this section shall be expended exclusively i Washington justice purposes and shall not be used to replace or supplant existing funding Criminal justic defined as activities that substantially assist the criminal justice system,which may include ci _ 1 TV Washington where ancillary benefit to the civil justice system occurs, and which includes domestic violent E-1 Washington Courts such as those provided by domestic violence programs,community advocates, and legal ads defined in RCW 70 123.020. Existing funding for purposes of this subsection is defined as ca E:1 OFM Fiscal Note 1989 actual operating expenditures for criminal justice purposes Calendar year 1989 actual Website expenditures for criminal justice purposes exclude the following- Expenditures for extraordine likely to reoccur, changes in contract provisions for criminal justice services, beyond the cont jurisdiction receiving the services, and major nonrecurring capital expenditures. In the expenditure of funds for criminal justice purposes as provided in this section,cities x or any combination thereof, are expressly authorized to participate in agreements, pursuant i RCW,to jointly expend funds for criminal justice purposes of mutual benefit Such criminal ju of mutual benefit include, but are not limited to,the construction, improvement, and expansio facilities, and juvenile justice facilities [1995 c 309 § 1; 1993 sp.s. c 21 § 6. Prior: 1991 c 311 § 5; 1991 c 301 § 16; ex.s. c 1 § 901.] Glossary of Terms I Comments about this site I Privacy Notice I Accessibility Information I Discl Page 5 City of Kent Vacant Positions As of October 8, 2009 Fund/Department Position Title FTE General Fund Finance Accounting Technician 1.00 Law Civil Legal Assistant 1.00 Fire Fire Fighter 1.00 Police Records Specialist 2.00 CEU Program Supervisor 1.00 Corrections Administrative Asst. I 1.00 Public Works Accounting Services Asst 3 1.00 Transportation Engineer 4 1.00 Survey Party Chief 1.00 Design Engineer 3 1.00 Development Engineer 3 1.00 Parks International Program Coord. 0.53 General Fund Vacancy Subtotal 12.53 Capital Proiects Funds Parks Planning & Dev. Coordinator 2.00 Enterprise Funds PW -Water/Drain/Sewer Maintenance Worker 3 2.00 Parks - Golf Head Golf Pro 1.00 Golf Shop Assistant 0.75 Grant Funds Parks Field Supervisor 1.00 Internal Service Funds Information Technology Systems Div. Manager 1.00 Parks - Facilities HVAC Mechanic 1.00 Other Funds Vacancy Subtotal 8.75 All Funds Vacancy Total 21.28 CHANGES TO THE AGENDA Citizens wishing to address the Council will, at this time, make known the subject of interest, so all may be properly heard. A) FROM COUNCIL, ADMINISTRATION, OR STAFF B) FROM THE PUBLIC PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS A) PUBLIC RECOGNITION B) COMMUNITY EVENTS C) HUMAN SERVICES REPORT Kent City Council Meeting Date October 21, 2008 ' Category Public Hearings - 5A 1. SUBJECT: 2009 OPERATING BUDGET (SECOND HEARING) 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: This date has been set for the second public hearing on the 2009 Annual Budget. ' 3. EXHIBITS: None 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Finance Director (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? N/A Revenue? N/A Currently in the Budget? Yes No 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: ' A. Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds to close the public hearing. ' B. Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ' ACTION: Kent City Council Meeting Date October 21, 2008 Category Public Hearings - 5B 1. SUBJECT: 2009-2014 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (SECOND HEARING) AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: This date has been set for the second public hearing on the 6-year (2009-2014) Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and amending the Capital Facilities Element of the Kent Comprehensive Plan. 3. EXHIBITS: 2009-2014 Capital Improvement Plan, Addendum to the Kent Comprehensive Plan Environmental Impact Statement, and adoption of existing environmental documents 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Finance Director (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? N/A Revenue? N/A Currently in the Budget? Yes No 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: A. Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds to close the public hearing. B. Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ' ACTION: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN ' The CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (CIP) is a 2009-2014 CIP Sources of Funds 32 six year plan developed and updated annually. 2009-2014 CIP Projects Forecast 33 Included is a listing of Capital Improvement ' Projects for 2009 to 2014. 2009-2014 Capital Improvement Program 34 2009 - 2014 Capital Improvement Program Sources of Funds Amounts in 000's i Sources To Be Determined Bond Proceeds 4% ' Grants 10% Capital 8% Improvement Fund 35% Facilities Fund 2% 1 Street Fund 5% Utility Funds 36% Sources of Funds 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total Capital Improvement Fund 6,167 8,446 13,204 10,699 4,719 5,502 48,737 Street Fund 1,781 2,759 1,424 714 674 35 7,387 Utility Funds 8,194 10,465 8,876 8,183 9,886 5,668 51,272 Facilities Fund 510 635 625 675 650 725 3,820 Grants 80 5,060 1,005 1,705 805 2,205 10,860 Bond Proceeds 7,800 6,000 - - - - 13,800 Sources To Be Determined 3,466 835 215 215 165 140 5,036 Total Sources of Funds 27,998 34,200 25,349 22,191 16,899 14,275 140,912 2009 - 2014 Capital Improvement Program , Projects Forecast Amounts in 000's , Transportation , 9% Utility Fund Projects Public Safety 36% '_= 23% 1 General Government Parks, Recreation& , 12% Community Services 20% Projects 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total ' Transportation 4,846 4,774 1,389 714 639 35 12,397 Public Safety 9,706 4,925 9,333 6,953 528 528 31,973 Parks, Recreation 3,362 6,226 3,891 4,516 3,966 6,224 28,185 &Community Services General Government 1,855 7,810 1,825 1,825 1,845 1,820 16,980 Utility Fund Projects 8,229 10,465 8,911 8,183 9,921 5,668 51,377 ' Total Projects 27,998 34,200 25,349 22,191 16,899 14,275 140,912 General Government 2009 - 2014 Capital Improvement Program Amounts in Thousands Total 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Sources of Funds LTGO Bonds 6,000 6,000 ' CIP Revenues 7,035 1,220 1,175 1,200 1,150 1,195 1,095 Facilities Revenues 3,820 510 635 625 675 650 725 Source To Be Determined 125 125 Total Sources of Funds 16,980 1.855 _ 7,810 _1.825 __1 825 _-_1 845 1.820 Projects Funded Facilities Emergency Facility Repairs(Lifecycle) 900 150 150 150 150 150 150 Floor Covering Replacements(Lifecycle) 580 60 60 85 125 100 150 Sealcoat Parking Lots(Lifecycle) 540 125 90 100 100 125 HVAC Lifecycle Replacements(Lifecycle) 1,800 300 300 300 300 300 300 Facilities Card Access 455 130 75 75 75 100 Fire Station Grounds Renovation 230 40 50 25 25 45 45 Golf Course Improvements 200 25 25 75 25 25 25 Technology Software Business System Replacements 3,000 500 500 500 500 500 500 Hardware Lifecycle Replacements 2,700 450 450 450 450 450 450 Tech Plan 2008-2012 6,000 6,000 Connected Community 125 125 Other General Government Neighborhood Programs 450 75 75 75 75 75 75 Total Projects Funded 1-6 980 1_1855 7810 1 825 1.825 1 845 1 820 Public Safety 2009 - 2014 Capital Improvement Program Amounts in Thousands Total 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Sources of Funds LTGO Bonds 7,800 7,800 CIP Revenues 23,973 1,706 4,925 9,333 6,953 528 528 Source To Be Determined 200 200 Total Sources of Funds 31,973 9,706 4,9215 9,333 _ 6.953 528 5_2_8_ Projects Funded Technology Public Safety MDC Replacements 1,170 195 195 195 195 195 195 Fire and Emergency Services Exhaust Extraction Systems 15 15 Security Fences 150 88 62 Remodel Washington Ave Fire Station 6,825 500 6,325 Replacement Fire Hose 93 16 16 16 16 16 16 Breathing Apparatus Replacement Program 945 158 158 158 158 158 158 Fire Equipment Replacement Fund 770 220 110 110 110 110 110 Replacement Radio Fund 525 400 125 Police Services CKCF Renovation 3,650 450 3,200 Inmate Barcode Scan/Kiosk 40 40 Patrol Audio/Video Recording Equipment 150 75 75 Reader Board Speed Signs Project 50 25 25 Police Plate Carrier Project 30 30 2 Unmarked Detective Vehicles 60 60 Automated License Plate Readers-Council 70 70 Portable Radios-Replacement 300 50 50 50 50 50 50 Crime Scene Van Replacemnt/Equip Upgrade 75 75 Pursuit Intervention Technique Equipment 25 25 Satellite Processing of Traffic NOls 200 30 100 70 AR-15 Rifles 75 75 Police/Fire Training Center Expansion Police/Fire Training Center 8,640 750 7,890 Training Center Classroom Upgrades 50 25 25 Citywide Driving Simulator 150 150 Other Public Safety Municipal Court Building Expansion 7,800 7,800 Camera Upgrade/Renovations 30 30 Annex Furniture Upgrades 25 25 Public Safety 1 2009 - 2014 Capital Improvement Program Amounts in Thousands 1 Total 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Work Crew Van/Trailer Equipment 60 — 60 Total Projects Funded 31,973 9 706 4,925 9,333 6,953 528 528 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 Transportation 2009 - 2014 Capital Improvement Program Amounts in Thousands Total 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Sources of Funds Federal Grant 1,940 1,940 WA State Grant 150 75 75 Local Improvement District 3,026 3,026 Street Revenues 7,282 1,746 2,759 1,389 714 639 35 Total Sources of Funds 12,397 _4,846 4,774 1,38-- 714 639 35 Projects Funded Arterials East Valley Highway(SR 167-212th) 5,264 2,964 2,300 1st Avenue North Improvements 750 500 250 4th Avenue North Improvements 1,000 1,000 248th Street Improvements 1,250 500 375 375 2nd Avenue Pedestrian Improvements 332 332 Intersections 124th Avenue Improvements 1,250 500 375 375 Other Transportation Miscellaneous Asphalt Overlays 1,500 500 500 500 Transit Now Partnership Program 260 260 Neighborhood Traffic Control 150 75 75 Shopper Shuttle 210 35 35 35 35 35 35 Street Channelization Program 356 89 89 89 89 Pavement Rating Survey 75 15 15 15 15 15 Total Projects Funded 12,397 4.846 4,774 1,389 714 639 35 Parks, Rec & Comm Services 2009 - 2014 Capital Improvement Program Amounts in Thousands Total 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Sources of Funds WA State Grant 7,550 2,400 950 1,200 800 2,200 King County Grant 50 50 Other Grant 1,170 5 595 55 505 5 5 Donations/Contributions 61 11 10 10 10 10 10 CIP Revenues 1,700 700 100 100 100 100 600 CIP REET2 Revenues 16,029 2,541 2,246 2,571 2,496 2,896 3,279 Source To Be Determined 1,625 105 825 205 205 155 130 Total Sources of Funds _28 185 _3�362 _6 226 3 891 4 516 _3 966 6,224 Projects Funded Facilities Parks Maintenance Renovation 25 25 Kent Pool Improvements 250 250 Community Parks Valley Floor Athletic Complex Acq.&Dev. 500 500 Riverwalk/Riverview Park Development 130 130 Urban Forestry Program 60 10 10 10 10 10 10 Demolition of Rental Houses 25 25 Uplands Playfield Parking/Street Improv. 250 250 East Hill Skate Park(Debt Service) 48 8 8 8 8 8 8 Kent Parks Foundation 150 25 25 25 25 25 25 Adopt-A-Park Volunteer Program 240 40 40 40 40 40 40 Commons Neighborhood Park 30 30 Van Doren's Park Improvements 300 150 150 Service Club Community Park 200 200 Clark Lake Development 1,050 50 1,000 Wilson Playfields Acquisition/Renovation 2,000 500 1,500 East Hill Park Land Acquisition 825 325 500 First Avenue Plaza 36 36 Lake Meridian Park Ren. &Master Plan 1,300 100 1,200 Regional/Local Dog Off Leash Park 300 50 250 Eagle Creek Park Development 1,200 1,000 200 Life Cycle-Trails 54 9 9 9 9 9 9 Town Square Plaza(Debt Service) 960 192 192 192 192 192 Russell Woods/228th Corr. Park/Trailhead 150 150 West Fenwick Park Renovation 1,500 1,500 International Parks Acq./Development 50 50 Parks, Rec & Comm Services 2009 - 2014 Capital Improvement Program Amounts in Thousands Total 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Community Sports Fields 2,200 250 1,250 200 500 Lifecycle Renovations Life Cycle-Play Equipment 300 50 50 50 50 50 50 ' Life Cycle-Ballfields 175 25 50 25 25 25 25 Life Cycle-Irrigation 150 25 25 25 25 25 25 Life Cycle-Infield Soil 150 25 25 25 25 25 25 Event Center Lifecycle 1,800 300 300 300 300 300 300 Life Cycle Park System 2,076 346 346 346 346 346 346 Neighborhood Parks Tudor Square Renovations 100 100 Clark Lake Land Acquisition 2,000 1,000 1,000 132nd Street Park Development 2,100 100 1,700 300 West Hill Park Development 1,785 115 1,670 Springwood Park Improvements 65 65 Kiwanis Tot Lot#1 Improvements 75 75 S.272nd St. Neighborhood Park Develop. 100 100 Planning,Architect, Engineer Comprehensive Park&Recreation Plan 15 15 Glenn Nelson Park Improvements 100 100 Lake Fenwick Park Improvements 275 100 50 125 Master Plans 150 25 25 25 25 25 25 Architect/Engineering 60 10 10 10 10 10 10 Other Parks, Rec&Comm Svc Service Club Ballfields(Debt Service) 1,400 280 280 280 280 280 Wilson Playfields(Debt Service) 846 141 141 141 141 141 141 Grant Matching Funds/Land Acq. 450 75 75 75 75 75 75 Eagle Scout Volunteer Program 180 30 30 30 30 30 30 Total Projects Funded _28,185 3.362 _6 226 3,891 4,516 3,966 6.224 Utilities 2009 - 2014 Capital Improvement Program Amounts in Thousands Total 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Sources of Funds Street Revenues 105 35 35 35 Water Revenues 30,890 2,842 7,221 5,455 5,425 7,051 2,896 Sewer Revenues 7,505 2,835 1,500 1,635 500 535 500 Drainage Revenues 12,877 2,517 1,744 1,786 2,258 2,300 2,272 Total Sources of Funds -51s377 8,229 10 465 8.911 _8.183 9921 921 5 668 Projects-Funded Stormwater Management Soos Creek Basin Improvements 3,500 1,000 500 500 500 500 500 Mill Creek 2,950 200 250 250 750 750 750 NPDES 1,437 222 229 236 243 250 257 Miscellaneous Drainage Improvement 1,590 265 265 265 265 265 265 Riverview Park 250 250 Drainage Infrastructure Replacements 3,000 500 500 500 500 500 500 Miscellaneous Wetland Facility Upgrade 45 45 Sanitary Sewer Miscellaneous Sewer Replacements 6,000 1,400 1,500 1,600 500 500 500 Kentview Interceptor 600 600 Skyline Interceptor 800 800 Water Supply& Distribution Rock Creek Mitigation Projects 1,532 185 185 185 185 396 396 Large Meter&Vault Replacement 403 72 76 80 85 90 Miscellaneous Water Improvements 2,840 340 500 500 500 500 500 East Hill Pressure Zone 14,000 500 1,500 4,000 4,000 4,000 Hydrant Replacement Program 150 30 30 30 30 30 East Hill Water Supply Assessment 150 150 3.5MG East Hill Reservoir 5,400 1,000 4,400 Tacoma Pipeline 6,310 530 530 625 625 2,000 2,000 Combined Utilities Aerial Flight 420 140 140 140 Total Projects Funded 51 377 8,229 10,465 _ 8 911 8 883 9,921 5 668 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Fred N. Satterstrom, AICP, Director PLANNING SERVICES Charlene Anderson, AICP, Manager • Phone: 253-856-5454 KENT Fax: 253-856-6454 WASH I N O T O N Address: 220 Fourth Avenue S. Kent, WA 98032-5895 CITY OF KENT ADDENDUM TO THE KENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Responsible Official: Charlene Anderson SCOPE The City of Kent has completed environmental analysis, pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), for an amendment of the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan to include the City's 2009-2014 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). This amendment to the Capital Facilities Element is occurring concurrently with the adoption of the City's 2009 operating budget as provided by RCW 36.70A.130. The GMA requires cities and counties to approve and maintain a six (6) year capital facilities plan which includes requirements for specific types of capital facilities, measurable levels-of-service (LOS) standards, financial feasibility, and assurance that adequate facilities are provided as population and employment growth occurs. Kent's annual budget document and six-year CIP fulfill the GMA requirement for facilities planning. In addition, these documents serve as a foundation for the city's fiscal management and eligibility for grants and loans. The CIP and annual budget, along with the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan provide coordination among the cty's many plans for capital improvements. The annual budget and six-year CIP contain broad goals and specific financial policies that guide and implement the provisions for adequate public services and facilities. The six-year CIP is a funding mechanism to implement projects and programs identified in the City's Comprehensive Plan. Specifically, the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan contains goals and policies related to the provision and maintenance of public services and capital facilities which are necessary to support the projected growth over the next twenty (20) years. The goals and policies of the Capital Facilities Element are consistent with the Land Use, Transportation and Parks and Open Space Elements. The Comprehensive Plan EIS, draft and final, evaluated the growth potential as identified in the City's Comprehensive Plan. The adoption of the six-year CIP concurrently with the cty's annual budget is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan EIS - Addendum Capital Improvement Program 2009-2014 Comprehensive Plan EIS analysis as the types of projects and programs identified in the CIP are specifically related to the growth projections in the Comprehensive Plan and EIS. SEPA COMPLIANCE In October 1993, the City of Kent issued a Determination of Significance (DS) and Notice of Scoping for the Comprehensive Plan (ENV-93-51). After a series of public meetings, a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) was issued on July 18, 1994 for the Draft Comprehensive Plan, issued on the same date. The DEIS was distributed to City Council and Planning Commission members, adjacent jurisdictions, affected agencies and other parties of interest. After comments on the DEIS were solicited and reviewed, a Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) was issued and distributed on January 30, 1995. This Addendum to the Kent Comprehensive Plan EIS evaluates the adoption of the six-year CIP. No additional impacts are identified since the CIP implements projects and programs identified and evaluated in the City's Comprehensive Plan and Comprehensive Plan EIS. STATEMENT OF CONSISTENCY Future projects associated with the CIP will be subject to and shall be consistent with the following: City of Kent Comprehensive Plan, the Kent City Code, International Fire Code, International Building Code, Public Works Standards and all other applicable laws and ordinances in effect at the time a complete project permit application is filed. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW - BACKGROUND The City of Kent has followed the process of phased environmental review as it undertakes actions to implement the Comprehensive Plan. The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and rules established for the act, WAC 197- 11, outline procedures for the use of existing environmental documents and preparing addenda to environmental decisions. Nonproject Documents - An EIS prepared for a comprehensive plan, development regulation, or other broad based policy documents are considered "non-project," or programmatic in nature (see WAC 197-11-704). These are distinguished from EISs or environmental documents prepared for specific project actions, such as a building permit or a road construction project. The purpose of a non-project EIS is to analyze proposed alternatives and to provide environmental consideration and mitigation prior to adoption of an alternative. It is also a document that discloses the process used in evaluating alternatives to decision-makers and citizens. Phased Review - SEPA rules allow environmental review to be phased so that review coincides with meaningful points in the planning and decision making process, (WAC 197-11-060(5)). Broader environmental documents may be followed by narrower documents that incorporate general discussion by reference and concentrate solely on issues specific to that proposal. SEPA , Page 2 of 4 Comprehensive Plan EIS - Addendum Capital Improvement Program 2009-2014 rules also clearly state that agencies shall use a variety of mechanisms, including addenda, adoption and incorporation by reference, to avoid duplication and excess paperwork. Future projects identified and associated with the implementation of the Capital Improvement` Program may require individual and separate environmental review, pursuant to SEPA. Such review will occur when a specific project is identified. Prior Environmental Documents - The City of Kent issued a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for the Comprehensive Plan on July 18, 1994 (#ENV-93-51). The DEIS analyzed three comprehensive plan land use alternatives, and recommended mitigation measures, which were used in preparing comprehensive plan policies. The preferred land use alternative which was incorporated into the Comprehensive Plan was most closely related to Alternative 2 of the DEIS, (the mixed-use alternative). A Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) was issued on January 30, 1995, and the Comprehensive Plan was adopted by the City Council on April 18, 1995. Scope of Addendum - As outlined in the SEPA rules, the purpose of an addendum is to provide environmental analysis with respect to the described actions. This analysis builds upon the Comprehensive Plan EIS but does not substantially change the identified impacts and analysis; therefore it is prudent to utilize the addendum process as outlined in WAC-197-11- 600(4)(c). ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS All environmental elements were adequately addressed within the parameters of the City of Kent Comprehensive Plan EIS, draft and final. Further, subsequent "project" actions would require the submittal of separate environmental checklists, pursuant to SEPA, which will be analyzed for consistency with the original mitigating conditions and may require new mitigation based upon site-specific conditions. The adoption of the six-year CIP implements goals and policies identified in the City`s Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan. Specifically, the CIP implements the following: Goal CF-1 - As the Cityof Kent continues to row and develop, ensure that 9 P an adequate supply and range of public services and capital facilities are available to provide satisfactory standards of public health, safety, and quality of life. Policy CFI.Z - Ensure that public services and capital facilities needs are addressed in updates to the Capital Facilities Plans and Capital Improvement Programs, and development regulations as appropriate. Goal CF-4 - Ensure that appropriate funding sources are available to acquire or bond for the provision of needed public services and facilities. Page 3 of 4 Comprehensive Plan EIS - Addendum Capital Improvement Program 2009-2014 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY Kent City Code section 11.03.510 identifies plans and policies from which the City may draw substantive mitigation under the State Environmental Policy Act. This nonproject action has been evaluated in light of those substantive plans and policies as well as within the overall analysis completed for the City's Comprehensive Plan EIS. DECISION The City of Kent Comprehensive Plan EIS, draft and final, provided analysis with regard to the implementation of the Comprehensive Plan elements, goals and policies. This includes the implementation of the Capital Facilities Element and Capital Improvement Programs. The City has reviewed the 2009-2014 CIP and has found it to be consistent with the range, types and magnitude of impacts and corresponding mitigation outlined in the Comprehensive Plan EIS. The adoption of the six-year CIP does not substantially change any identified related impacts in the Comprehensive Plan EIS. This analysis and subsequent addendum did not identify any new significant impacts associated with the adoption of the 2009-2014 CIP. Therefore, this addendum, combined with the Comprehensive Plan EIS adequately evaluates potential adverse environmental impacts and provides appropriate mitigation for this nonproject action. Based upon this analysis, a separate threshold determination is not required. This document and corresponding environmental record may be utilized in the future in conjunction with environmental review for future projects identified in the CIP in accordance with the guidelines provided by WAC 197-11. Dated: October 14, 2008 Signature: Nl43WA& AG't1, 4 --P Charlene Anderson, AICP, Responsible Official CA:jm\\S:\Permit\Plan\Env\2008\CIPaddendum2009-2014.doc i t Page 4 of 4 ! KENT WASH I Harom ADOPTION OF EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS Adoption Document(s): EIS Description of current_proposal: The action proposed by the City consists of the adoption of an updated Capital Improvement Program concurrent with the 2009 city operating budget. The Capital Improvement Plan is an element of the City's Comprehensive Plan. Proponent: City of Kent Location of proposal: The proposal is a city-wide action. Title of document(s) being adopted: City of Kent Comprehensive Plan Environmental Impact Statement Draft (July 1994) and Final (January 1995) - Prepared by the City of Kent. Description of document (or portion) being adopted: The City of Kent Comprehensive Plan EIS is being adopted in total. This document evaluated three different land use alternatives for the city. The analysis evaluated the type and range of impacts to the environment associated with each land use alternative and associated development regulations. If the document has been challenged (WAC 197-11-630), please describe: The document was not challenged. Document availability: This document is available for review at the City of Kent Planning Services office, 400 West Gowe, Kent, WA 98032 from 8:00 am to 5:00 pm. We have identified and adopted this document as being appropriate for this proposal after independent review. Along with the addendum, this document meets our environmental review needs for the current proposal and will accompany the proposal to the decision maker(s). Name of agency adopting the document: City of Kent Contact person/Responsible Official: Charlene Anderson, AICP (253) 856-5431 Planning Manager City of Kent Community Development Dept. 220 Fourth Ave South Kent, W 98032 i Date- 1 W14108 Signatur - 'r � A" " kmoci RiwiAwk S:\Permit\Plan\Env\2008\CIPadopt2009-2014.doc Kent City Council Meeting Date October 21, 2008 Category Public Hearings - 5C 1. SUBJECT: 2008 TAX LEVY FOR 2009 BUDGET 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: This date has been set for the public hearing on the 2008 Tax Levy for the 2009 Budget. 3. EXHIBITS: None 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Finance Director (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? N/A Revenue? N/A Currently in the Budget? Yes No 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: A. Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds to close the public hearing. B. Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Kent City Council Meeting Date October 21, 2008 Category Public Hearings - 5D 1. SUBJECT: KENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND KENT CITY CODE CHAPTER 12.13 AMENDMENTS, SCHOOL DISTRICT CAPITAL FACILITIES PLANS - IMPACT FEES 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: This public hearing is to consider the amendment of the Capital Facilities element of the Kent Comprehensive Plan to incorporate the updated Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent, Federal Way and Auburn School Districts. These plans propose to also amend school impact fees outlined in Kent City Code Chapter 12.13. The Kent City Code requires the School Districts to submit their updated Plans annually for Council review and consideration. 3. EXHIBITS: Staff memo from Charlene Anderson dated 10/13/08 w/attachments; Kent, Federal Way, and Auburn School Districts' Capital Facilities Plans and Determinations of Nonsignificance and Environmental Checklists 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Staff (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? No Revenue? No Currently in the Budget? Yes No 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: A. Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds to close the public hearing. B. Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Fred N. Satterstrom, AICP, Director PLANNING SERVICES KENT Charlene Anderson,AICP, Manager WASH IN G T O H Phone: 253-856-5454 Fax: 253-856-6454 Address: 220 Fourth Avenue S. Kent,WA 98032-5895 October 13, 2008 TO: Council President Debbie Raplee and City Council Members FROM: Charlene Anderson, AICP, Planning Manager SUBJECT: Kent Comprehensive Plan and Kent City Code Chapter 12.13 Amendments, School District Capital Facilities Plans-Impact Fees MOTION: None at this time. This issue will be decided concurrently with adoption of the 2009 Annual Budget and 2009-14 Capital Improvement Program. SUMMARY: This public hearing will consider amendment of the Capital Facilities Element of the Kent Comprehensive Plan to incorporate the updated Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent, Federal Way and Auburn School Districts. These plans propose to also amend school impact fees outlined in Kent City Code Chapter 12.13. Kent City Code requires the School Districts to submit their updated Plans annually for Council review and consideration. The City Council holds the public hearing on the school district plans at the same time as the public hearing for the budget, i.e., October 21, 2008. The City of Kent 6-year Capital Improvement Program being considered this evening also will update the Capital Facilities Element of the Kent Comprehensive Plan. BUDGET IMPACT: None BACKGROUND: One of the planning goals under the Growth Management Act (RCW 36.70A.020) is to ensure that those public facilities and services necessary to support development are adequate and timely to serve the development without decreasing current service levels below minimum standards. The Act (RCW 36.70A.070) requires the Capital Facilities Element of the Kent Comprehensive Plan to inventory existing capital facilities, forecast future needs and provide for financing of those facilities. RCW 82.02.050 authorizes cities planning under the Growth Management Act to impose impact fees on development activity as part of the financing for public facilities needed to serve new growth and development. As a result, KCC 12.13.080 and 090 provide for imposition of school impact fees on behalf of any school district which provides to the City a capital facilities plan; the plan is adopted by reference as part of the Capital Facilities Element of the Kent Comprehensive Plan. The school districts are required to submit for annual Council review their updated capital facilities plans (KCC 12.13.060 & 070). The Kent, Federal Way and Auburn School Districts submitted their 2008/9 — 2013/14 Capital Facilities Plans and are requesting amendments of the Kent Comprehensive Plan and Kent City Code Chapter 12.13 to reflect changes to impact fees resulting from new student population generated by new single family and multifamily residential development. The updated plans include an inventory of existing facilities, existing facility needs, expected future facility requirements, expected funding, and calculation of the impact fees according to the formula set Q p 9, p 9 forth in KCC 12.13.140. The Kent School District proposes to increase their existing school impact fees for single family units from $5,110 to $5,304 (an increase of $194 or 3.8%) and for multifamily units from $3,146 to $3,266 (an increase of $120 or 3.8%). The Federal Way School District proposes to increase their existing school impact fees for single family units from $3,883 to $4,017 (an increase of $134 or 3.5%) and increase their fees for multifamily units from $1,647 to $1,733 (an increase of $86 or 5.2%). The Auburn School District proposes to increase their existing school impact fees for single family units from $5,361.04 to $5,374.64 (an increase of $13.60 or 0.3%) and increase their fees for multifamily units from $465.78 to $877.02 (an increase of $411.24 or 88.3%). The only area in Kent where Auburn School District's impact fees are applied is the Verdana or Bridges PUD on the former impoundment reservoir site. Included with this memo are comparison tables among the three school districts as well as historical data on their school impact fees. CA\pm 5\Permit\Plan\COMP_PLAN_AMENDMENTS\2008\CPA-2008-4_SchlDlsMctsCapFacPlansUpdates\capfaalities102108.doc Eric: School Districts'Capital Facilities Plans Determinations of Nonsignificance Environmental Checklists ROW 36.70A.020&070,ROW 82.02.050 KCC 12.13.060-090, KCC 12.13.140 Comparison Tables and Historical Data cc: Fred N. Satterstrom,AICP,CD Director Charlene Anderson,AICP, Planning Manager Project File Parties of Record Comprehensive Plan/Capital Facilities Element Amendment&Update to Chapter 12.13 Kent City Code ' 11/21/06 City Council Meeting Page 2 of 2 School District Capital Facilities Plans 2008/09 to 2013/14 Impact Fee Calculation Kent Federal Way Auburn Site Cost SFR $2,822.91 $ -0- $ 1,234.25 MFR 1,877.71 -0- 246.85 Construction Cost SFR $29,630.62 $ 14,470 $20,399.70 MFR 18,815.91 5,383 3,987.87 Temporary Facility Cost SFR $ 87.18 $ 53 $ 17.79 MFR 57.99 20 3.56 State Match Credit SFR $ 6,924.80 $ 3,086 $ 6,906.96 MFR 3,955.52 1,148 1,403.97 Tax Credit SFR $ 4,205.56 $ 3,402 $ 3,995.51 MFR 1,363.29 790 1,080.26 Impact Fee SFR $ 5,304 (+ 3.8%) $ 4,017 (+ 3.5%) $ 5,374.64(+ 0.3%) MFR 3,266 + 3.8% 1,733 + 5.2% 877.02 +88.3% % financed by fees 1 35.1% 1 4% 1 ? Impact Fees History 2000-2008 Kent Federal Way Auburn Kent Federal Way Auburn SFR MFR 2009 $5,304 $4,017 $5,374.64 2009 $3,266 $1,733 $ 877.02 2008 $5,110 $3,883 $5,361.04 2008 $3,146 $1,647 $ 465.78 2007 $4,928 $3,018 $5,657.05 2007 $3,034 $ 856 $1,228.84 2006 $4,775 $3,393 $5,681.36 2006 $2,940 $ 895 $1,536.30 2005 4,056 2,868 5,296.90 2005 1,762 905 1,831.85 2004 4,292 3,269 4,528.00 2004 2,643 940 1,212.00 2003 4,147 3,865 N/A 2003 2,554 1,086 N/A 2002 3,782 2,616 N/A 2002 2,329 896 N/A 2001 3,782 2,710 N/A 2001 2,329 830 N/A 2000 3,782 2,384 N/A 2000 1 2,329 786 N/A S\Pcrtmt\Plan\COMP_PLAN_AMENDMENTS\2008\CPA-2008-0_SchlDistncisCapFacPlansUpdatcs\CPA-2008-4_cap(acdincsiablcl doc School District Capital Facilities Plans 2008/09 to 2013/14 Kent Federal Way Auburn t Area Cost Allowance $168.79 $168.79 $168.43 State Match% 57.06% 61.84% 59.32% District Average AV SFR $316,091 $297,242 $290,617 MFR 102,465 68,998 78,574 Debt Service Capital Levy Rate/$1000 $1.73 $1.49 $1.79 Bond Interest Rate 5.11% 5.11% 5.11% Issues: Kent: 2006 bond—Construct new elementary school, replace elementary school, renovate 2 middle schools, and expand 2 high schools Federal Way: 2007 bond—replace 1 middle school and 4 elementary schools Consolidate support services Auburn: 2 Elementary Schools 2007 and 2013 1 Middle School 2011 S\Permd\Plan\COMP_PLAN_AMENDMENTS\2008\CPA-2008-4_SchlDistnctsCapFacPlansUpdates\CPA-2008-4_capfacihnestable2 doc t 1 i School District Capital Facilities Plans—2008/09 to 2013/14 General Statistics Kent Federal Way Auburn Student Generation SFR Elementary .445 .3285 .3370 Middle .118 .1631 .1450 Sr High .245 .2446 .1780 MFR Elementary .296 .1222 .0650 Middle .075 .0621 .0290 Sr High .111 .0942 .0390 FTE Enrollment 2007/08 25,745 20,716 13,847 Capacity 2008-9 27,369 22,525 15,950 Class Size K= 22 K- 2 =20 K—2 =25 1-4 = 23 3 - 5 = 25 3 - 4= 27 5 - 6 = 29 6 - 12= 26 5 = 30 7 - 8 = 29 6-12 = 30 9-12—31 25 for 7th & 10`h English) S\Tema\Plan\COMP_PLAN_AMENDMENTS\2008\CPA-20084_SchlDistnctsCapFacPlansUpdatcs\CPA-2008-4_capfacihdestablc3 doc RCW 36.70A.020 Planning goals. The following goals are adopted to guide the development and adoption of comprehensive plans and development regulations of those counties and cities that are required or choose to plan under RCW 36.70A.040. The following goals are not listed in order of priority and shall be used exclusively for the purpose of guiding the development of comprehensive plans and development regulations: (1) Urban growth. Encourage development in urban areas where adequate public facilities and services exist or can be provided in an efficient manner. (2) Reduce sprawl. Reduce the inappropriate conversion of undeveloped land into sprawling, low- density development. (3) Transportation. Encourage efficient multimodal transportation systems that are based on regional priorities and coordinated with county and city comprehensive plans. (4) Housing. Encourage the availability of affordable housing to all economic segments of the population of this state, promote a variety of residential densities and housing types, and encourage preservation of existing housing stock. (5) Economic development. Encourage economic development throughout the state that is consistent with adopted comprehensive plans, promote economic opportunity for all citizens of this state, especially for unemployed and for disadvantaged persons, promote the retention and expansion of existing businesses and recruitment of new businesses, recognize regional differences impacting economic development opportunities, and encourage growth in areas experiencing insufficient economic growth, all within the capacities of the state's natural resources, public services, and public facilities. (6) Property rights. Private property shall not be taken for public use without just compensation having been made. The property rights of landowners shall be protected from arbitrary and discriminatory actions. (7) Permits. Applications for both state and local government permits should be processed in a timely and fair manner to ensure predictability. (8) Natural resource industries. Maintain and enhance natural resource-based industries, including productive timber, agricultural, and fisheries industries. Encourage the conservation of productive forest lands and productive agricultural lands, and discourage incompatible uses. (9) Open space and recreation. Retain open space, enhance recreational opportunities, conserve fish and wildlife habitat, increase access to natural resource lands and water, and develop parks and recreation facilities. (10) Environment. Protect the environment and enhance the state's high quality of life, including air and water quality, and the availability of water. (11) Citizen participation and coordination. Encourage the involvement of citizens in the planning process and ensure coordination between communities and jurisdictions to reconcile conflicts. (12) Public facilities and services. Ensure that those public facilities and services necessary to support development shall be adequate to serve the development at the time the development is available for occupancy and use without decreasing current service levels below locally established minimum standards. (13) Historic preservation. Identify and encourage the preservation of lands, sites, and structures, that have historical or archaeological significance. [2002 c 154§1; 1990 1st ex s c 17§2.] S\Permit\Plan\COMP_PLAN_AMENDMENTS\2008\CPA-2008-4_SchlDlstrlctsCapFacPlansUpdates\RCW-36 70A 020_CC102108 doc RCW 36.70A.070 Comprehensive plans — Mandatory elements. The comprehensive plan of a county or city that is required or chooses to plan under RCW 36.70A.040 shall consist of a map or maps, and descriptive text covering objectives, principles, and standards used to develop the comprehensive plan. The plan shall be an internally consistent document and all elements shall be consistent with the future land use map. A comprehensive plan shall be adopted and amended with public participation as provided in RCW 36.70A.140. Each comprehensive plan shall include a plan, scheme, or design for each of the following: (1) A land use element designating the proposed general distribution and general 1 location and extent of the uses of land, where appropriate, for agriculture, timber production, housing, commerce, industry, recreation, open spaces, general aviation airports, public utilities, public facilities, and other land uses. The land use element shall include population densities, building intensities, and estimates of future population growth. The land use element shall provide for protection of the quality and quantity of groundwater used for public water supplies. Wherever possible, the land use element should consider utilizing urban planning approaches that promote physical activity. Where applicable, the land use element shall review drainage, flooding, and storm water run-off in the area and nearby jurisdictions and provide guidance for corrective actions to mitigate or cleanse those discharges that pollute waters of the state, including Puget Sound or waters entering Puget Sound. (2) A housing element ensuring the vitality and character of established residential neighborhoods that: (a) Includes an inventory and analysis of existing and projected housing needs that identifies the number of housing units necessary to manage projected growth; (b) includes a statement of goals, policies, objectives, and mandatory provisions for the preservation, improvement, and development of housing, including single-family residences; (c) identifies sufficient land for housing, including, but not limited to, government-assisted housing, housing for low-income families, manufactured housing, multifamily housing, and group homes and foster care facilities; and (d) makes adequate provisions for existing and projected needs of all economic segments of the community. (3) A capital facilities plan element consisting of: (a) An inventory of existing capital facilities owned by public entities, showing the locations and capacities of the capital facilities; (b) a forecast of the future needs for such capital facilities; (c) the proposed locations and capacities of expanded or new capital facilities; (d) at least a six-year plan that will finance such capital facilities within projected funding capacities and clearly identifies sources of public money for such purposes; and (e) a requirement to reassess the land use element if probable funding falls short of meeting existing needs and to ensure that the land use element, capital facilities plan element, and financing plan within the capital facilities plan element are coordinated and consistent. Park and recreation facilities shall be included in the capital facilities plan element. (4) A utilities element consisting of the general location, proposed location, and capacity of all existing and proposed utilities, including, but not limited to, electrical lines, telecommunication lines, and natural gas lines. l 1 (5) Rural element. Counties shall include a rural element including lands that are not designated for urban growth, agriculture, forest, or mineral resources. The following provisions shall apply to the rural element: (a) Growth management act goals and local circumstances. Because circumstances vary from county to county, in establishing patterns of rural densities and uses, a county may consider local circumstances, but shall develop a written record explaining how the rural element harmonizes the planning goals in RCW 36.70A.020 and meets the requirements of this chapter. (b) Rural development. The rural element shall permit rural development, forestry, and agriculture in rural areas. The rural element shall provide for a variety of rural densities, uses, essential public facilities, and rural governmental services needed to serve the permitted densities and uses. To achieve a variety of rural densities and uses, counties may provide for clustering, density transfer, design guidelines, conservation easements, and other innovative techniques that will accommodate appropriate rural densities and uses that are not characterized by urban growth and that are consistent with rural character. (c) Measures governing rural development. The rural element shall include measures ! that apply to rural development and protect the rural character of the area, as established by the county, by: (i) Containing or otherwise controlling rural development; (ii) Assuring visual compatibility of rural development with the surrounding rural area; (iii) Reducing the inappropriate conversion of undeveloped land into sprawling, low- density development in the rural area; (iv) Protecting critical areas, as provided in RCW 36.70A.060, and surface water and groundwater resources; and (v) Protecting against conflicts with the use of agricultural, forest, and mineral resource lands designated under RCW 36.70A.170. (d) Limited areas of more intensive rural development. Subject to the requirements of ! this subsection and except as otherwise specifically provided in this subsection (5)(d), the rural element may allow for limited areas of more intensive rural development, including necessary public facilities and public services to serve the limited area as follows: (i) Rural development consisting of the infill, development, or redevelopment of existing commercial, industrial, residential, or mixed-use areas, whether characterized as shoreline development, villages, hamlets, rural activity centers, or crossroads developments. (A) A commercial, industrial, residential, shoreline, or mixed-use area shall be subject to the requirements of (d)(iv) of this subsection, but shall not be subject to the requirements of (c)(ii) and (iii) of this subsection. (B) Any development or redevelopment other than an industrial area or an industrial use within a mixed-use area or an industrial area under this subsection (5)(d)(i) must be 2 ! principally designed to serve the existing and projected rural population. (C) Any development or redevelopment in terms of building size, scale, use, or intensity shall be consistent with the character of the existing areas. Development and redevelopment may include changes in use from vacant land or a previously existing use so long as the new use conforms to the requirements of this subsection (5); (ii) The intensification of development on lots containing, or new development of, small- scale recreational or tourist uses, including commercial facilities to serve those recreational or tourist uses, that rely on a rural location and setting, but that do not include new residential development. A small-scale recreation or tourist use is not required to be principally designed to serve the existing and projected rural population. Public services and public facilities shall be limited to those necessary to serve the recreation or tourist use and shall be provided in a manner that does not permit low-density sprawl; (iii) The intensification of development on lots containing isolated nonresidential uses or new development of isolated cottage industries and isolated small-scale businesses that are not principally designed to serve the existing and projected rural population and nonresidential uses, but do provide job opportunities for rural residents. Rural counties may allow the expansion of small-scale businesses as long as those small-scale businesses conform with the rural character of the area as defined by the local government according to *RCW 36.70A.030(14). Rural counties may also allow new small-scale businesses to utilize a site previously occupied by an existing business as long as the new small-scale business conforms to the rural character of the area as defined by the local government according to *RCW 36.70A.030(14). Public services and public facilities shall be limited to those necessary to serve the isolated nonresidential use and shall be provided in a manner that does not permit low-density sprawl; (iv) A county shall adopt measures to minimize and contain the existing areas or uses of more intensive rural development, as appropriate, authorized under this subsection. Lands included in such existing areas or uses shall not extend beyond the logical outer boundary of the existing area or use, thereby allowing a new pattern of low-density sprawl. Existing areas are those that are clearly identifiable and contained and where there is a logical boundary delineated predominately by the built environment, but that may also include undeveloped lands if limited as provided in this subsection. The county shall establish the logical outer boundary of an area of more intensive rural development. In establishing the logical outer boundary the county shall address (A) the need to preserve the character of existing natural neighborhoods and communities, (B) physical boundaries such as bodies of water, streets and highways, and land forms and contours, (C) the prevention of abnormally irregular boundaries, and (D) the ability to provide public facilities and public services in a manner that does not permit low-density sprawl; (v) For purposes of (d) of this subsection, an existing area or existing use is one that was in existence: (A) On July 1, 1990, in a county that was initially required to plan under all of the provisions of this chapter; (B) On the date the county adopted a resolution under RCW 36.70A.040(2), in a county that is planning under all of the provisions of this chapter under RCW 36.70A.040(2); or 3 (C) On the date the office of financial management certifies the county's population as provided in RCW 36.70A.040(5), in a county that is planning under all of the provisions of this chapter pursuant to RCW 36.70A.040(5). (e) Exception. This subsection shall not be interpreted to permit in the rural area a major industrial development or a master planned resort unless otherwise specifically permitted under RCW 36.70A.360 and 36.70A.365. (6) A transportation element that implements, and is consistent with, the land use element. (a) The transportation element shall include the following subelements: (i) Land use assumptions used in estimating travel; (ii) Estimated traffic impacts to state-owned transportation facilities resulting from land use assumptions to assist the department of transportation in monitoring the performance of state facilities, to plan improvements for the facilities, and to assess the impact of land- use decisions on state-owned transportation facilities; (iii) Facilities and services needs, including: (A) An inventory of air, water, and ground transportation facilities and services, including transit alignments and general aviation airport facilities, to define existing capital facilities and travel levels as a basis for future planning. This inventory must include state- owned transportation facilities within the city or county's jurisdictional boundaries; (B) Level of service standards for all locally owned arterials and transit routes to serve as a gauge to judge performance of the system. These standards should be regionally coordinated; (C) For state-owned transportation facilities, level of service standards for highways, as prescribed in chapters 47.06 and 47.80 RCW, to gauge the performance of the system. The purposes of reflecting level of service standards for state highways in the local comprehensive plan are to monitor the performance of the system, to evaluate improvement strategies, and to facilitate coordination between the county's or city's six- year street, road, or transit program and the department of transportation's six-year investment program. The concurrency requirements of (b) of this subsection do not apply to transportation facilities and services of statewide significance except for counties consisting of islands whose only connection to the mainland are state highways or ferry routes. In these island counties, state highways and ferry route capacity must be a factor in meeting the concurrency requirements in (b) of this subsection; (D) Specific actions and requirements for bringing into compliance locally owned transportation facilities or services that are below an established level of service standard; (E) Forecasts of traffic for at least ten years based on the adopted land use plan to provide information on the location, timing, and capacity needs of future growth; (F) Identification of state and local system needs to meet current and future demands. Identified needs on state-owned transportation facilities must be consistent with the 4 statewide multimodal transportation plan required under chapter 47.06 RCW; (iv) Finance, including: (A) An analysis of funding capability to judge needs against probable funding resources; (B) A multiyear financing plan based on the needs identified in the comprehensive plan, the appropriate parts of which shall serve as the basis for the six-year street, road, or transit program required by RCW 35.77.010 for cities, RCW 36.81.121 for counties, and RCW 35.58.2795 for public transportation systems. The multiyear financing plan should be coordinated with the six-year improvement program developed by the department of transportation as required by **RCW 47.05.030; (C) If probable funding falls short of meeting identified needs, a discussion of how additional funding will be raised, or how land use assumptions will be reassessed to ensure that level of service standards will be met; (v) Intergovernmental coordination efforts, including an assessment of the impacts of the transportation plan and land use assumptions on the transportation systems of adjacent jurisdictions; (vi) Demand-management strategies; (vii) Pedestrian and bicycle component to include collaborative efforts to identify and designate planned improvements for pedestrian and bicycle facilities and corridors that address and encourage enhanced community access and promote healthy lifestyles. (b) After adoption of the comprehensive plan by jurisdictions required to plan or who choose to plan under RCW 36.70A.040, local jurisdictions must adopt and enforce ordinances which prohibit development approval if the development causes the level of service on a locally owned transportation facility to decline below the standards adopted in the transportation element of the comprehensive plan, unless transportation improvements or strategies to accommodate the impacts of development are made concurrent with the development. These strategies may include increased public transportation service, ride sharing programs, demand management, and other transportation systems management strategies. For the purposes of this subsection (6) "concurrent with the development" shall mean that improvements or strategies are in place at the time of development, or that a financial commitment is in place to complete the improvements or strategies within six years. (c) The transportation element described in this subsection (6), and the six-year plans required by RCW 35.77.010 for cities, RCW 36.81.121 for counties, RCW 35.58.2795 for public transportation systems, and **RCW 47.05.030 for the state, must be consistent. (7) An economic development element establishing local goals, policies, objectives, and provisions for economic growth and vitality and a high quality of life. The element shall include: (a) A summary of the local economy such as population, employment, payroll, sectors, businesses, sales, and other information as appropriate; (b) a summary of the strengths and weaknesses of the local economy defined as the commercial and industrial sectors and supporting factors such as land use, transportation, utilities, education, workforce, housing, and natural/cultural resources; and (c) an identification of policies, 5 programs, and projects to foster economic growth and development and to address future needs. A city that has chosen to be a residential community is exempt from the economic development element requirement of this subsection. (8) A park and recreation element that implements, and is consistent with, the capital facilities plan element as it relates to park and recreation facilities. The element shall include: (a) Estimates of park and recreation demand for at least a ten-year period; (b) an evaluation of facilities and service needs; and (c) an evaluation of intergovernmental coordination opportunities to provide regional approaches for meeting park and recreational demand. (9) It is the intent that new or amended elements required after January 1, 2002, be adopted concurrent with the scheduled update provided in RCW 36.70A.130. Requirements to incorporate any such new or amended elements shall be null and void until funds sufficient to cover applicable local government costs are appropriated and distributed by the state at least two years before local government must update comprehensive plans as required in RCW 36.70A.130. [2005 c 360 § 2; (2005 c 477 § 1 expired August 31, 2005); 2004 c 196 § 1; 2003 c 152 § 1. Prior: 2002 c 212 § 2; 2002 c 154 § 2; 1998 c 171 § 2; 1997 c 429 § 7; 1996 c 239 § 1; prior: 1995 c 400 § 3; 1995 c 377 § 1; 1990 1st ex.s. c 17 § 7.] Notes: Reviser's note: *(1) RCW 36.70A.030 was amended by 2005 c 423 § 2, changing subsection (14) to subsection (15). **(2) RCW 47.05.030 was amended by 2005 c 319 § 9, changing the six-year improvement program to a ten-year improvement program. Expiration date -- 2005 c 477 § 1: "Section 1 of this act expires August 31, 2005." [2005 c 477 § 3.] Effective date -- 2005 c 477: "This act is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety, or support of the state government and its existing public institutions, and takes effect immediately [May 13, 2005]." [2005 c 477 § 2.] Findings -- Intent -- 2005 c 360: "The legislature finds that regular physical activity is essential to maintaining good health and reducing the rates of chronic disease. The legislature further finds that providing opportunities for walking, biking, horseback riding, and other regular forms of exercise is best accomplished through collaboration between the private sector and local, state, and institutional policymakers. This collaboration can build communities where people find it easy and safe to be physically active. It is the intent of the legislature to promote policy and planning efforts that increase access to inexpensive or free opportunities for regular exercise in all communities around the state." [2005 c 360 § 1.] Prospective application -- 1997 c 429 §§ 1-21: See note following RCW 36.70A.3201. 6 , Severability -- 1997 c 429: See note following RCW 36.70A.3201. Construction -- Application -- 1995 c 400: "A comprehensive plan adopted or amended before May 16, 1995, shall be considered to be in compliance with RCW 36.70A.070 or 36.70A.110, as in effect before their amendment by this act, if the - comprehensive plan is in compliance with RCW 36.70A.070 and 36.70A.110 as amended by this act. This section shall not be construed to alter the relationship between a county- wide planning policy and comprehensive plans as specified under RCW 36.70A.210. As to any appeal relating to compliance with RCW 36.70A.070 or 36.70A.110 pending before a growth management hearings board on May 16, 1995, the board may take up to an additional ninety days to resolve such appeal. By mutual agreement of all parties to the appeal, this additional ninety-day period may be extended." [1995 c 400 § 4.] Effective date -- 1995 c 400: See note following RCW 36.70A.040. S\Permlt\Plan\COMP_PLAN_AMENDMENTS\2008\CPA-2008-4_SchlDlstrictsCapFacPlansUpdates\RCW-36 70A 070_CC102108 doc 7 RCW 82.02.050 Impact fees — Intent — Limitations. (1) It is the intent of the legislature: (a) To ensure that adequate facilities are available to serve new growth and development; (b) To promote orderly growth and development by establishing standards by which counties, cities, and towns may require, by ordinance, that new growth and development pay a proportionate share of the cost of new facilities needed to serve new growth and development; and (c) To ensure that impact fees are imposed through established procedures and criteria so that specific developments do not pay arbitrary fees or duplicative fees for the same impact. (2) Counties, cities, and towns that are required or choose to plan under RCW 36.70A.040 are authorized to impose impact fees on development activity as part of the financing for public facilities, provided that the financing for system improvements to serve new development must provide for a balance between impact fees and other sources of public funds and cannot rely solely on impact fees. (3) The impact fees: (a) Shall only be imposed for system improvements that are reasonably related to the new development; (b) Shall not exceed a proportionate share of the costs of system improvements that are reasonably related to the new development; and (c) Shall be used for system improvements that will reasonably benefit the new development. (4) Impact fees may be collected and spent only for the public facilities defined in RCW 82.02.090 which are addressed by a capital facilities plan element of a comprehensive land use plan adopted pursuant to the provisions of RCW 36.70A.070 or the provisions for comprehensive plan adoption contained in chapter 36.70, 35.63, or 35A.63 RCW. After the date a county, city, or town is required to adopt its development regulations under chapter 36.70A RCW, continued authorization to collect and expend impact fees shall be contingent on the county, city, or town adopting or revising a comprehensive plan in compliance with RCW 36.70A.070, and on the capital facilities plan identifying: (a) Deficiencies in public facilities serving existing development and the means by which existing deficiencies will be eliminated within a reasonable period of time; (b) Additional demands placed on existing public facilities by new development; and (c) Additional public facility improvements required to serve new development. If the capital facilities plan of the county, city, or town is complete other than for the inclusion of those elements which are the responsibility of a special district, the county, city, or town may impose impact fees to address those public facility needs for which the county, city, or town is responsible. [1994 c 257 § 24; 1993 sp.s. c 6 § 6; 1990 1st ex.s. c 17 § 43.) 1 Notes: Severability -- 1994 c 257: See note following RCW 36.70A.270. Effective date -- 1993 sp.s. c 6: See note following RCW 36.70A.040. Severability -- Part, section headings not law -- 1990 1st ex.s. c 17: See RCW 36.70A.900 and 36.70A.901. SEPA: RCW 43.21C.065. S:�Permit\Plan\COMP PLAN AMENDMENTS\2008\CPA-2008-4 SchlDistrictsCapFacPlansUpdates\RCW-82.02.OS0 CC102108.doc 2 j KENT CITY CODE Chapter 12.13 SCHOOL IMPACT FEES 12.13.060 Submission of district capital facilities plan and data. A. On an annual basis, the district shall submit the following materials to the city council: 1. The district's capital facilities plan (as defined in KCC 12.13.010 herein) and adopted by the school board; 2. The district's enrollment projections over the next six (6) years, its current enrollment and the district's enrollment projections and actual enrollment from the previous year; 3. The district's standard of service; 4. The district's overall capacity over the next six (6) years, which shall take into account the available capacity from school facilities planned by the district but not yet built and be a function of the district's standard of service as measured by the number of students which can be housed in district facilities; 5. An inventory of the district's existing facilities. B. To the extent that the district's standard of service identifies a deficiency in its existing facilities, the district's capital facilities plan must identify the sources of funding other than impact fees, for building or acquiring the necessary facilities to serve the existing student population in order to eliminate the deficiencies within a reasonable period of time. C. Facilities to meet future demand shall be designed to meet the adopted standard of service. If sufficient funding is not projected to be available to fully fund a capital facilities plan which meets the adopted standard of service, the district's capital facilities plan should document the reason for the funding gap, and identify all sources of funding that the district plans to use to meet the adopted standard of service. D. The district shall also submit an annual report to the city council showing the capital improvements which were serviced in whole or in part by the impact fees. E. In its development of the financing plan component of the capital facilities plan, the district shall plan on a six (6) year horizon and shall demonstrate its best efforts by taking the following steps: 1. Establish a six (6) year financing plan, and propose the necessary bond issues and levies required by and consistent with that plan and as-approved by the school board consistent with RCW 28A.53.020, 84.52.052 and 84.52.056 as amended; and 2. Apply to the state for funding, and comply with the state requirements for eligibility to the best of the district's ability. (Ord. No. 3260, § 1, 12-19-95) 12.13.070 Annual council review. On at least an annual basis, the city council shall review the information submitted by the district pursuant to KCC 12.13.060(A) herein. The review shall occur in conjunction with any update of the capital facilities plan element of the city's comprehensive plan. (Ord. No. 3260, § 1, 12-19-95) 12.13.080 Impact fee program elements. A. Impact fees will be assessed on every new dwelling unit in the district for which a fee schedule has been established. B. Impact fees will be imposed on a district by district basis, on behalf of any school district which provides to the city, a capital facilities plan, the district's standards of service for the various grade spans, estimates of the cost of providing needed facilities and other capital improvements, and the data from the district called for by the formula in KCC 12.13.140. Any impact fee imposed shall be reasonably related to the impact caused by the development, and shall not exceed a proportionate share of the cost of system improvements that are reasonably related to the development. The impact fee formula shall account in the fee calculation for future revenue the district will receive from the development. The ordinance adopting the fee schedule shall specify under what circumstances the fee may be adjusted in the interests of fairness. C. The impact fee shall be based on the capital facilities plan developed by the district and approved by the school board, and adopted by reference by the city as part of the capital facilities element of the comprehensive plan for the purpose of establishing the fee program. KENT CITY CODE Chapter 12.13 SCHOOL IMPACT FEES (Ord. No. 3260, § 1, 12-19-95) 12.13.090 Fee calculations. A. The fee shall be calculated based on the formula set out in KCC 12.13.140. B. Separate fees shall be calculated for single-family and multifamily types of dwelling units, and separate student generation rates must be determined by the district for each type of dwelling unit. For the purpose of this chapter, mobile homes shall be treated as single-family dwellings and duplexes shall be treated as multifamily dwellings. C. The fee shall be calculated on a district-wide basis using the appropriate factors and data to be supplied by the district, as indicated in KCC 12.13.140. The fee calculations shall also be made on a district-wide basis to assure maximum utilization of all school facilities in the district used currently or within the last two (2) years for instructional purposes. D. The formula in KCC 12.13.140 provides a credit for the anticipated tax contributions that would be made by the developments based on historical levels of voter support for bond issues in the district. E. The formula also provides for a credit for school facilities or sites actually provided by a developer which the district finds acceptable. F. The city may also impose an application fee to cover the reasonable costs of administration of the impact fee program. (Ord. No. 3260, § 1, 12-19-95) 12.13.140 Formula for determining school impact fees. A. School impact fees shall be determined as follows: IF: A = Student factor for dwelling unit type and grade span x site cost per student for sites for facilities in that grade span = Full cost fee for site acquisition cost B = Student factor for dwelling unit type and grade span x school construction cost per student for facilities in that grade span x ratio of district's square footage of permanent facilities to total square footage of facilities = Full cost fee for school construction C = Student factor for dwelling unit type and grade span x relocatable facilities cost per student for facilities in that grade span x ratio of district's square footage of relocatable facilities to total square footage of facilities = Full cost fee for relocatable facilities D = Student factor for dwelling unit type and grade span "Boeckh Index" x SPI square ft per student factor x state match % = State match credit, and Al, 131, C1, D1 = A, B, C, D for elementary grade spans A2, B2, C2, D2 = A, B, C, D, for middle/junior high grade spans A3, B3, C3, D3 = A, B, C, D for high school grade spans TC = Tax payment credit = The net present value of the average assessed value in the district for unit type x current school district capital property tax levy rate, using a ten (10) year discount period and current interest rate (based on the bond buyer twenty (20) bond general obligation bond index) FC = Facilities credit = the per-dwelling-unit value of any site or facilities provided directly by the development Then the unfunded need = UN = Al + . . . + C3 (D1-D2-D3) - TC And the developer fee obligation = F = U/N2 And the net fee obligation = NF = F - FC B. Notes to formula. 1. Student factors are to be provided by the district based on district records of average actual student generation rates for new developments constructed over a period of not more than five (5) years prior to the date of the fee calculation; if such information is not available in the district, data from adjacent districts, districts with similar demographics, or countywide averages must be used. Student factors must be separately determined for single-family and multifamily dwelling units, and for grade spans. 2. The "Boeckh index" is a construction trade index of construction costs for various kinds of buildings; it is adjusted annually. 3. The district is to provide its own site and facilities standards and projected costs to be used in the formula, consistent with the requirements of this chapter. KENT CITY CODE Chapter 12.13 SCHOOL IMPACT FEES 4. The formula can be applied by using the following table: Table for Calculating School Impact Fee Obligations for Residential Dwelling Units (to be separately calculated for single-family and multifamily units) Elementary school site cost per student x the student factor = A2= Middle/junior high site cost per student x the student factor = A3= High school site cost per student x the student factor = A= Al + A2 + A3 = B1= Elementary school construction cost per student x the student factor = B2= Middle/junior high construction cost per student x the student factor = B3= High school construction cost per student x the student factor = B= (131 + B2 + 63) x square footage of permanent facilities = total square footage of facilities C1= Elementary school relocatable facility cost per student x the student factor = C2= Middle/junior high relocatable facility cost per student x the student factor = C3= High school relocatable facility cost per student x the student factor = C= (Cl + C2 + C3) x square footage of permanent facilities = total square footage of facilities D1= Boeckh index x SPI square footage per student for elementary school x state = match % x student factor D2= Boeckh index x SPI square footage per student for middle/junior high school = x state match % x student factor — D3= Boeckh index x SPI square footage per student for high school x state match — % x student factor D= D1 + D2 + D3 = TC= ((1+i)10) - 1 x average assessed value for the dwelling unit type in the school district i(1 + i)10 x current school district capital property tax levy rate where i+ the current interest rate as stated in the bond buy twenty (20) bond general obligation bond index FC= Value of site of facilities provided directly by the development number of dwelling units in development Total unfunded need = A + B + C - D = A +B KENT CITY CODE Chapter 12.13 SCHOOL IMPACT FEES +C -D Subtotal -TC Total unfunded need UN = divided by 2 = Developer fee obligation Less FC (if applicable) Net fee obligation (Ord. No. 3260, § 1, 12-19-95) S:%Permit�Plan\COMP PLANAMENDMENTS120081CPA-2008-4_SchlDistrictsCapFacPlansUpdateskKCC Chptr12.13 SchllmpactFees CC102108.doc MMMMk MINE 111110111100001 TAi lclilT ES 2008 a 2009 2013 201 soft .10 All PIT SeNUOL nisTailIT Neill Emerald Park Elementary Site Emerald Park Elementary School Emerald Park Elementary Serving Unincorporated ping County Residents And Residents of the Cities of Kent, Covington, Auburn, Renton Black Diamond, Maple valley, and Searlac, Washington Apri12008 mom 1 ut 3chool lisir Cl Ke Kent School District No. 415 12033 SE 256th Street Kent,Washington 98030-6643 (253) 373-7295 SIX - YEAR CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2008 - 2009 2013 - 2014 KENT �ts�Cca BOARD of DIRECTORS Jim Berrios Bill Boyce Sandra Collins Chris Davies Debbie Straus ' ADMINISTRATION 1 Barbara Grohe, Ph.D. — Superintendent Fred H. High — Assistant Superintendent for Business Services Mark Haddock, Ph.D. — Assistant Superintendent, Learning & School Improvement Larry Miner— Assistant Superintendent for Human Resources John Knutson — Executive Director of Finance Merri Rieger— Executive Director, School Improvement 9 — 12 Janis Bechtel — Executive Director, School Improvement K— 8 Jeanette Ristau — Executive Director, School Improvement K— 6 Becky Hanks — Executive Director, Community Connections Charles Lind — Executive Director, Labor Relations & Legal Services Laura Madeo — Executive Director of Instructional Services Greg Whiteman — Executive Director of Information Technology Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2008 ' 1 1 OAIML Kent obb U1 �Ulslrlcl KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 1 SIX - YEAR CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN ' 2008 - 2009 - 2013 - 2014 ' April 2008 For information on the Plan, please call the Finance & Planning Department at (253) 373-7295 ' Capital Facilities Plan Contributing Staff ' Gwenn Escher-Derdowski Forecast& Planning Administrator Fred Long, Supervisor of Facilities Construction Karla Wilkerson & Lynell Mooney, Facilities Department Don Walkup, Supervisor of Transportation Department Kathy Fosjord,Transportation Department Cover Design by Debbi Smith Maps by Jana Tucker Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2008 Kept SChUU1 District SiX year CapitaC Facifities PCan rIadle of Contents Section Page Number I Executive Summary 2 ' I I Six-Year Enrollment Projection & History 4 ' III District Standard of Service 9 I V Inventory, Capacity & Maps of Existing Schools 12 V Six-Year Planning and Construction Plan 15 V I Relocatable Classrooms 18 , V I I Projected Classroom Capacity 19 V I I I Finance Plan, Cost Basis and Impact Fee Schedules 24 ' I X Summary of Changes to Previous Plan 31 X Appendixes 32 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2008 I Executive Summary ' This Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") has been prepared by the Kent School District (the "District") as the organization's facilities planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act, King County Code K.C.C. 21A.43 and Cities of Kent, Covington, Auburn, Renton, Black Diamond, Maple Valley, and SeaTac. This annual plan update was prepared using data available in the spring of 2008 for the 2007-2008 school year. ' This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the Kent School District. This Plan is not intended to be the sole planning document for all of the District's needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic Long Range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board Policies, taking into account a longer or shorter time period, other factors and trends in the use of facilities, ' and other needs of the District as may be required. Prior Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent School District have been adopted by Metropolitan King County Council and Cities of Kent, Covington, Auburn and Renton and included in the Capital Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. The first ordinance implementing impact fees for the ' unincorporated areas was effective September 15, 1993. In order for impact fees to be collected in the unincorporated areas of Kent School District, the Metropolitan King County Council must adopt this Plan and a fee-implementing ordinance for the District. For impact fees to be collected in the incorporated portions of the District, the cities of Kent, Covington, Auburn and Renton must also adopt this Plan and their own school impact fee ordinances. This Plan has also been submitted to cities of Black Diamond, Maple Valley, and SeaTac. This Capital Facilities Plan establishes a standard of service in order to ascertain current and future capacity. While the State Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines do not account for local program needs in the District. The Growth Management Act, King County and City codes and ordinances authorize the District to make ' adjustments to the standard of service based on specific needs for students of the District. ' This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. Program capacity is based on an average capacity and updated to reflect changes to special programs served in each building. Relocatables in the capacity calculation use the same standard of service as the permanent facilities. (continued) Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2008 Page 2 A I Executive Summary (continued) , The capacity of each school in the District is calculated based on the District standard of service and the existing inventory, which includes some relocatable , classrooms. The District's program capacity of permanent facilities reflects program changes and the reduction of class size to meet the requirements of Student Achievement Initiative 728. Relocatables provide additional transitional capacity until permanent facilities are completed. Kent School District is the fourth largest district in the state. Enrollment is electronically reported monthly to the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI) on Form P-223. Although funding apportionment is based on Annual Average Full Time Equivalent (AAFTE), Enrollment on October 1 is a widely recognized "snapshot in time" that is used to report the District's enrollment for the year. P-223 Headcount for October 1, 2007 was 26,862. P-223 FTE (Full Time Equivalent) enrollment was 25,745.42. (FTE reports Kindergarten at .5 and excludes , Early Childhood Education [ECE] and college-only Running Start students.) The actual number of individual students per the October 2007 full head count was 27,584. (Full Headcount reports all enrolled students at 1.0 including Kindergarten, ECE and , college-only Running Start students.) The District's standard of service, enrollment history and projections, and use of transitional facilities are reviewed in detail in various sections of this Plan. The District plans to continue to satisfy concurrency requirements through the transitional use of relocatables. A financing plan is included in Section V I I I which demonstrates the District's ability to implement this Plan. Pursuant to the requirements of the Growth , Management Act, this Plan will be updated annually with changes in the fee schedules adjusted accordingly. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2008 Page 3 ' I I Six -Year Enrollment Projection ' For capital facilities planning, growth projections are based on cohort survival and student yield from documented residential construction projected over the next six years. (See Table 2)The student generation factor, as defined on the next page, is the basis for the growth projections from new developments. King County births and the District's relational percentage average were used to determine the number of kindergartners entering the system. (see Table 1) 8.29% of 22,431 King County live births in 2003 is projected for 1,860 students expected in Kindergarten for October 1, 2008. Together with proportional growth from new construction, 8.29% of King County births is equivalent to the number of students projected to enter kindergarten in the district for the next six-year period.(See Table 2) State Funded Full Day Kindergarten ("FDK") programs have required a revision to the methodology for projecting Kindergarten at 1.0 FTE for qualifying schools. Schools with half-day Kindergarten programs and the optional Tuition-based FDK are projected at .50 FTE. (see Table 2 a) Early Childhood Education students (sometimes identified as "Preschool Special 1 Education [SE] or handicapped students") are forecast and reported separately. Capacity is reserved to serve the ECE programs at seven elementary schools. The first grade population is traditionally 7 - 8% larger than the kindergarten population due to growth and transfers to the District from private kindergartens. Cohort survival method uses historical enrollment data to forecast the number of students projected for the following year. Near term projections assume some growth from new developments to be offset by current local economic conditions. With notable exceptions, the expectation is that enrollment increases will occur District-wide in the long term. District projections are based on historical growth patterns combined with continuing development of projects in the pipeline dependent on market/growth conditions. The District will continue to track new development activity to determine impact to schools and monitor conditions to reflect adjustments in this assumption. The six-year enrollment projection anticipates moderate enrollment growth from new development currently in some phase of planning or construction in the district. ' Information on new residential developments and the completion of these proposed developments in all jurisdictions may be considered in the District's future analysis of growth projections. Within practical limits, the District has kept abreast of proposed developments. The Kent School District serves seven permitting jurisdictions: unincorporated King County, the cities of Kent, Covington, and Auburn and small portions of the cities of Renton, SeaTac, and Maple Valley. The west Lake Sawyer area of Kent School District is in the city of Black Diamond. ' (Continued) Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2008 Page 4 1 I I Six -Year Enrollment Projection (Continued) 1 STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR "Student Factor' is defined by King County code as "the number derived by a school district to describe how many students of each grade span are expected , to be generated by a dwelling unit" based on district records of average actual student generated rates for developments completed within the last five years. Following these guidelines, the student generation factor for Kent School District Is as follows: Single Family Elementary .445 Middle School .118 Senior High .245 Total .808 Multi-Family Elementary .296 Middle School .075 ' Senior High .111 Total .482 The student generation factor is based on a survey of 1,878 single family dwelling units and 1,283 multi-family dwelling units with no adjustment for occupancy rates. Please refer to Appendix E on Page 36 of the Capital Facilities Plan for details of the Student Generation Factor survey. The actual number of students in those residential developments was determined using the District's Education Logistics (EDULOG) Transportation L System. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2008 Page 5 o O M to M (7) O OD O 7 O d N � O f.- c OO a0 N O ccoo o co O O O Cl) O f0 r w 0) ^ N Iq to N N °) N N N N N N N N N - a L cC � 0O N O N o O1 NO � O) o M OD CO 13Y In d N N O d c ^ o N O N O N N N N N N N N co d c to m N N Oo — N O o o O N C> onp p M 00 N d O d O co r M 01 O O N m N N pp °� O O O N N N N N N N a O M co 2a Q �- N Of O O c to O r N 0) M l0 d r (O O [1 c' .- M N O O M d N O 0 O d N N c c N co M to O O O N N r T r r N 7 m N N 00 N N N N N N N N N a co Mca U N 0 ' m Ch — o `- to N N r to W W N. ON.D t0 O c o O rn tp tt) COto to r N o o tC) o o OD co o Y o Lo c O cli u� p oo co 0f 0) O O N N M Cl) N Ir a t"f d' >1 'c' Go N N cp N N N N N N N N t0 a y m E N N \ M N W u) CO 0) O O Q) M V) d O O c U O to co , Lg aD N. M r 'n E } c p Go 0) O O O M O d: O OD V: M O) 0 C to M N N pp N N N N N N N N IZ Iz N co a) C Nc tp01M r d co d LO O a) « 0)C) to O0, O � N � Lo NO Nc N 0) O Cl) M YV c co N N N N N N co O m y 0_ Z a) O M \ 0) u) CO to c0 M co co O N 0 W O tb rn tp O t0 0) cD to to O CM O r M M ao rn rn O M c O N N O O O O N O N O N r d Cl O Z' O rn � J co N N co N N N N N N N N N N N O N a) c ' o E � O O 0) 00 N r 0) to N N to r O N N T O �O a O N CO r - N M .- 00 O d OD Cl) co co _O cmc O p c M In d 0) O �- N O .- O O O I-- to O r y m Z W co N Q1 — N N N N N N N N N .-- U) In 04 E c NO 7 Lu V C rn 00 to M o d LO co to Co to M Cl t0 M O N � c+1 O 0 U O O Cl) M ^ (0 O O V O d t0 r N tf) 7 M N to '0 nj a0 N N O O N O O O a) 0) O 00 to O N tp .�. fA c 0 M m e— N co N N N N N N .- N Mtd ip Y to ' y LL H o U r 3 ti co \ to d M d M w N co r r r O T 4) a O) co c0 OJ N CO O to 00 N M co cn M r 0) O (O w 3 N W °,? M o 0 0 0 o 0 rn a) rn r to to t°S M m i � w72 0 co a— N 00 N N N N N N .- r N n t0 '0, ==q W LM rn O N o N M t0 t0 O d 0) r cn r to W a Of N L r 1 O O O ^ N t0 co N M N t0 to 00 to O) c O M rn o rn rn rn w rn cl co co d r co (n m N 00 tV N .- .- Cl) a dLL rn .� Y c c 0 n N Z W s a! 0 .- O N 0 0 0) co co O M D ` U W M r r M .- N W N d O CO O M N N "ai O. a 7 c 0) M to N O O c O O M 0) O) a0 r to � M N U Y r N co (V N N d N h o c M N co O N N O N rn N o r r t0 N M tt) co N O O 0) co d to � m v N to � O Cl) c d W cl cO c 01 N CO n O � 0 c 0 N N O 0) m (D O) 0) a7 O) a0 aD (0 C4 M t0 c C a m N „ 1- N Cl) Y E m = W ^ O E yLU O 0) M N co0) 00 (, ' m c N 00 p co O O W cr 0 O) cr � � t0 t 00 co to c $ v to O m cal O N N N uo pj t 4 N P p_ O tl m N C 0 0) CO O O tP) N d 0) Cl) O) O N U c Q O v O O N N O to O co N co to O 0) N Cl)O p ' c 0) O v d N O cl � 0) � a0 0D � (0 (0 d N N O W >1 '0 U c m a— N Oj N .- N rn M c t0 W° m to 0 a $ _ 0) � d w 0 to M O co N O LO 0) co w_ jv TIL O n � _ ad N mc � O_ c � a0_ c c0 N O -b CO - r - - r- n N LL c _ Y c m ° c u td co O N e N M d M N O d to M co O N LO °` 0 w N m c � 00 co to c0 n aN0_ � r t0 t0 q lo co a C07, N M O) W ) O II U m Op .- — — — — — — r � N d 0 Z � a1Oi > y x p x ° tt x C N N L L = lUa 0 N (n N N N O) (n « 0 N N E a N = c «Q) M U m OpO Nf c > y U Y N N W N V a) N it w >_ O m C C N c c E 0_ o m w y � -°i t%i E c E o o u E (Q M d to co f� 00 O ` Q O U IT 01 D7 • c W > Q E tL N N a ° c 2) a) N N N m t9 0 d N W LL a°) c M m c $ CJ 0 C C 'O V -0 'O 0 9 'O 'o G 7 W y N O Y Y 3 Y a C7 C7 C7 0 0 0 a 0 C7 C3 C9 C9 CD ~ > U' N~ � KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 SIX-YEAR F.T.E. ENROLLMENT PROJECTION State Funded FDK at 14 schools LB to 2002 LB in 2003 LB in 2004 LB in 2005 LB in 2006 LB in 2007 LB in 2008 AcrtOL •f� 0 .! E T ) Q October 2007 2008 2009 1 2010 H 2011 2012 2013 County Live Births' 21 863 22 431 22,874 22,680 24,244 24,250 24,300 King ty , Increase/Decrease 85 568 443 -194 1,564 6 50 , Kindergarten/Birth % 2 8.29% 8.29% 8.29% 8.29% 8.29% 8.29% 8.29% "I Kindergarten FTE @ .5 906 475 473 465 530 532 532 ' 2/3 FD Kindergarten @ 1.0 910 950 950 950 950 950 Grade 1 1,873 1,905 2,046 2,041 2,025 2,161 2,165 Grade 2 2,045 1,893 1,946 2,089 2,083 2,067 2,205 Grade 3 2,033 2,096 1,951 2,005 2,151 2,145 2,128 Grade 4 2,049 2,051 2,133 1,987 2,041 2,188 2,182 , Grade 5 2,020 2,051 2,085 2,168 2,021 2,075 2,223 Grade 6 2,098 2,094 2,124 2,159 2,244 2,094 2,149 Grade 7 2,130 2,133 2,135 2,165 2,201 2,286 2,135 Grade 8 2,184 2,088 2,115 2,117 2,146 2,181 2,265 , Grade 9 2,560 2,518 2,407 2,437 2,440 2,473 2,513 Grade 10 2,474 2,311 2,299 2,198 2,225 2,228 2,258 , Grade 11 1,882 2,071 2,044 2,034 1,945 1,969 1,972 Grade 12 1,491 1,468 1,772 1,749 1,741 1,665 1,686 ' Total FTE Enrollment 25,745 26,064 26,480 26,564 26,743 27,014 27,363 Note 2/3/4 Yearly Increase -119 319 416 84 179 271 349 Yearly Increase/Decrease% -0.46% 1.24% 1.60% 0.32% 0.67% 1.01% 1.29% Cumulative Increase -119 200 616 700 879 1,150 1,499 , Full Time Equivalent(FTE 25,745 26,064 26,480 1 26,564 26,743 27,014 27,363 Kindergarten enrollment projection is based on KSD percentage of live births in King County five years previous. 2 Kindergarten FTE projection is calculated by using the District's previous year percentage of King County births ' 5 years earlier compared to actual kindergarten enrollment in the previous year.(Excludes ECE-Early Childhood Education) 3 Kindergarten projection is at 1.0 FTE for 14 schools qualifying for 1-728&State Apportionment Funded Full Day Kindergarten(FDK) Schools with Optional Tuition-based Full Day Kindergarten programs&1/2 Day Kindergarten are projected at.5 FTE. , 4 Oct.2007 P223 FTE is 25,745&Headcount is 26,862.Full student count with ECE Preschool&Running Start=27,584. G R O W T H P R O J E C T I O N S - Agustments for current economic factors " For facilities planning purposes, this six-year enrollment projection anticipates moderate enrollment growth from new development currently in some phase of planning or construction in the district. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 2 April 2008 Page 7 U > 03 = a � wa -iwUw >- 0Ww -jO JO � � � xUm � U ui CO U U C.) U w w LL 0 U' (D z a a a m to m m m F- GN 2 LL L? a in u) Un 00 co to O O M O v N O ao c+ N in co M W) o o m m N M M M N N N M N M N N .- M N N M m CIO 0 C Q V Oc N W x N N U CDa I 0 9 � L « 0 C a c U) c _ to co 0 cc a (o o o w o co o p m Ln o w ao r o a n N r� o c N y y C � m T N C I C .0r y 'O C m LLI 0 2) 0 C Y. Q `n d LL y T CO)O N m N N M C_ C m a of c0 0Ul) m Y e a t. o c�v c m e! O 5 c v m(D d � v O w m c c f0 LL c a) mLL me �, N m co co N m cm M N N N O O 3 w 0 O m a 00 2 C Y to O F N U. F z . co co N lC CD CD V C C � O N LL m Q N N OD t 0 N N O O O N lL U -0C m N d o Y "' C LU D - w in d O y a v? Z F C - LL O N > pp,, � lL V v N tJ C) LL ~ H t > (n W w y y N O Z C co Y co O N `° O O J Y o o a LL Y a O LL o — v Co !C = of �' o I— N V _j a) 3 C LL 0 H O y c E Y p r Y o w co z x o 0 LL N r 0 aoo aCOo v E E, > W V LL o Q. 2 _ Y M Q o c y a Y o � Y � t 0 O of z coMy N M LU pp pp �p a pp pp a N 0 d FLL - w N c` m O m O LO to � O m N tv0 N m m w N t0 O m O O c L O JO o m - v v v v v �n v v v v %n M y Ln v v ui v st c7 v u� ttt��� u) v v c7 kn M to 0. LLQQ W N a U m 0 Q c d m o d 0 e ~ m U > O � xa3: ww -iwUw } <naw -10 0 QC) y c a FL LL z a a a m m y m m N 2 0 0 m a�_U Co LL th S?L V E C 0 N m lL lL C ^ r w O. O aci z c f0^ r m z = d d U O E y g `,q Z w m c E aci d E Z �o m aci (D Z �° E m �c Q rn Y m m (=j E c d '� d aci E `0 °� aEi E w c d c> y m c a� °� y °� O a) w d m c d m w E E N w m E d Ec E m Y m w w m °' m w w w E y y m m U °' c w w a w 0 w ate- w w m w w W o E X c g <o m o = 0 , d m w U E o m J t a� w a� a a y o c w } 0 3 C� > c �° y 0 c H c c 3 10 � L O f= m V cm H _m Y p E 0) o E m E ro a°) L o y aci m m ami m 0)i cco cc E o mod cmi °o a w m aNi m o° U U U U w W LL C7 U' U' x Y g z a a a to (o to (o co z° z° zo to c 0 Y III Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" In order to determine the capacity of facilities in a school district, King County Code 21 A.06 references a "standard of service" that each school district must establish in order to ascertain its overall capacity. The standard of service identifies the program year, the class size, the number of classrooms, students and programs of special need, and other factors determined by the district which would best serve the student population. This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. The District has identified schools with significant special needs programs as "impact" schools and the standard of service targets a lower class size at those facilities. Relocatables included in the capacity calculation use the same standard of service as the permanent facilities. (See Appendix A, e& C) The standard of service defined herein may continue to change in the future. Kent School District is continuing a long-term strategic planning process combined with review of changes to capacity and standard of service adjustments to meet the requirements of Student Achievement Initiative 728. This process will affect various aspects of the District's "standard of service" and future changes will be reflected in future capital facilities plans. Because the funding for Initiative 728 is incremental, implementation of the Initiative is also incremental and may result in changes to school capacity. 1 Current Standards of Service for Elementary Students Class size for Kindergarten should not exceed an average of 22 students. Class size for grades 1 -4 should not exceed an average of 23 students. Class size for grades 5 - 6 should not exceed an average of 29 students. Program capacity for general education elementary classrooms is calculated at an average of 24 students per classroom because of fluctuations between primary and intermediate grade levels (i.e. third/fourth or fourth/fifth grade split classes, etc.). Most elementary schools provide full day kindergarten programs (FDK or KAI — Full Day Kindergarten or Kindergarten Academic Intervention) with ' the second half of the day funded by grants or tuition. Students have scheduled time in a computer lab. Students may also be provided music instruction and physical education in a separate classroom or facility. Special Education for students with disabilities may be provided in a self- contained classroom with a capacity of 10-15 depending on the program. (continued) Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2008 Page 9 III Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" (continued) Identified students will also be provided other educational opportunities in classrooms for programs such as those designated as follows: English Language Learners (E L L) Self-contained Special Education Support Center Programs (SC) Integrated Programs & Resource Rooms (for special remedial assistance) Early Childhood Education (ECE) (3-4 yr. old students with disabilities) , School Adjustment (SA) Program for severely behavior-disordered students Speech & Language Therapy & Programs for Hearing Impaired students Adaptive Support Center for Mild, Moderate & Severe Disabilities (ASC-DD) Occupational & Physical Therapy Programs (OT/PT) Developmental Kindergarten in SC Programs Kindergarten Academic Intervention Program (KAI-Full Day Kindergarten) Education for Disadvantaged Students (Title I)— Federal Program Learning Assisted Programs (LAP) — State Program District Remediation Programs Education for Highly Capable Students (formerly "Gifted" Program) Some of the above special programs require specialized classroom space, as well as music and physical education classrooms, computer labs, etc.; thus, the permanent capacity of some of the buildings housing these programs is reduced. Some students, for example, leave their regular classroom for a short period of time to receive instruction in these special programs and "pull-out" space must be allocated to serve these programs. Some newer buildings have been constructed to accommodate most of these programs; some older buildings have been modified, and in some circumstances, these modifications reduce the classroom capacity of the buildings. When programs change, program capacity is updated to reflect the change in program and capacity. Current Standards of Service for Secondary Students The standards of service outlined below reflect only those programs and educational opportunities provided to secondary students which directly affect the capacity of the school buildings. Reductions have been made in 7th and 10th grade English classes for Initiative 728. These standards are subject to change pending annual updates based on staff and public review for changes funded by ' Student Achievement Initiative 728. Class size for grades 7 - 8 should not exceed an average of 29 students. Class size for 7th & 10th grade English class should not exceed an average of 25 students. Class size for grades 9 - 12 should not exceed an average of 31 students. Special Education for students with disabilities may be provided in a self- contained classroom with a capacity of 10-15 depending on the program. (cont'd.) Kent School District six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2008 Page 10 III Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" (continued) Identified secondary students will also be provided other educational opportunities in classrooms for programs designated as follows: Computer, Multi-media &Technology Labs&Programs—(Nova Net-Advanced Academics) Technology Academy programs at Kent-Meridian High School & Mill Creek Middle School Science Programs & Labs — Biology, Chemistry, Physics, Oceanography, Astronomy, ' Meteorology, Marine Biology, General Science, etc. English Language Learners (E L L) Integrated Programs & Resource Rooms(for special remedial assistance) Basic Skills Programs Transition Outreach Program (TOP)for 18-21 year old Special Education students Child Development Preschool and Daycare Programs Music Programs—Band, Orchestra, Chorus, Jazz Band, etc. Art Programs—Painting, Design, Drawing, Ceramics, Pottery, Photography, etc. Theater Arts—Drama, Stage Tech, etc. Journalism and Yearbook Classes Highly Capable (Honors or Gifted)and Advanced Placement Programs International Baccalaureate Program Kent Phoenix Academy—Performance Learning Center, Gateway,Virtual High School & Kent Success program with evening classes designed for credit retrieval Traffic Safety Education JROTC-Junior Reserve Officers Training Corps Variety of Career&Technical Education Programs (CTE-Vocational Education) Family&Consumer Science—Culinary Arts, Sewing, Careers w/Children/Educ., etc. Health & Human Services—Sports Medicine, Sign Language, Cosmetology, etc. Business Education—Word Processing,Accounting, Business Law&Math, DECA, FBLA(Future Business Leaders), Sales& Marketing, Economics,Web Design Technical & Industry — Woodworking, Cabinet Making, Building Trades, Metals, Automotive & Manufacturing Technology, Welding, Machine Shop, Drafting, Drawing, CAD (Computer-aided Design), Electronics, Engineering & Design,Aviation, etc. Graphic&Commercial Arts, Media, Photography, Theater&Stage,Ag & Horticulture Many of these programs and others require specialized classroom space which can reduce the permanent capacity of the school buildings. In addition, alternative home school assistance, choice and transition programs are provided for students in grades 2 - 12 at Kent Mountain View Academy. Space or Classroom Utilization As a result of scheduling conflicts for student programs, the need for specialized rooms for certain programs, and the need for teachers to have a work space during their planning periods, it is not possible to achieve 100% utilization of regular teaching stations at secondary schools. Based on the analysis of actual utilization of classrooms, the District has determined that the standard utilization rate is 85% for secondary schools. Program capacity at elementary schools reflects 100% utilization at the elementary level with adjustments for pull-out programs served In relocatables. In the future, the District will continue close analysis of actual utilization. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2008 Page 11 I V Inventory and Capacity of Existing Schools Currently, the District has permanent program capacity to house 27,150 students and transitional (relocatable) capacity to house 1,470. This capacity is based on the District's Standard of Service as set forth in Section I I I. Included in this Plan is an inventory of the District's schools by type, address and current capacity. (See Table 3 on Page 13) The program capacity is periodically updated for changes in programs, additional classrooms and new schools. Program capacity has been updated in this Plan to reflect program changes and new capacity for building additions at the high schools. Program capacity also reflects adjustments for the Student Achievement Initiative 728 reduction in class size. The class size reduction received voter approval in the Educational Programs and Operations Levy as well as through funding for Student Achievement Initiative 728. The District will conduct annual public review and update class size recommendations in accordance with the requirements and incremental funding of Student Achievement Initiative 728. Kent Mountain View Academyformer) Kent Learning Center and Grandview ( Y 9 Elementary) serves Grades 2 — 12 with transition, choice and home school assistance programs. It is located in the former Grandview School in the western part of the District in the city of SeaTac. This school was originally designed as an elementary school and is included in the elementary capacity for this Plan. Kent Phoenix Academy is a new non-traditional high school which opened in Fall 2007 in the renovated site and building that formerly served Sequoia Middle School. KPA has four special programs including the Performance Learning Center, Gateway, Virtual High School and Kent Success. Kent Success replaced the former Night Academy at Kent-Meridian High School and provides afternoon and evening classes for credit retrieval. Calculation of Elementary, Middle School and Senior High School capacities are set forth in Appendices A, B and C. A map of existing schools is included on Page 14. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2008 Page 12 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.415 INVENTORY and CAPACITY of EXISTING SCHOOLS 2007-2008 , Year SCHOOL Opened ABR ADDRESS Program Capacity' Carriage Crest Elementary 1990 CC 18235-140th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 452 Cedar Valley Elementary 1971 CV 26500 Timberlane Way SE, Covington 98042 402 Covington Elementary 1961 CO 17070 SE Wax Road, Covington 98042 498 Crestwood Elementary 1980 CW 25225-180th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 456 East Hill Elementary 1953 EH 9825 S 240th Street, Kent 98031 464 Emerald Park 1999 EP 11800 SE 216th Street, Kent 98031 504 Fanwood Elementary 1969 FW 16600-148th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 408 George T Daniel Elementary 1992 DE 11310 SE 248th Street, Kent 98030 450 Glenridge Elementary 1996 GR 19405-120th Avenue SE,Renton 98058 456 Grass Lake Elementary 1971 GL 28700-191st Place SE, Kent 98042 452 Horizon Elementary 1990 HE 27641-144th Avenue SE, Kent 98042 504 Jenkins Creek Elementary 1987 JC 26915-186th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 398 Kent Elementary 1999 KE 24700-64th Avenue South, Kent 98032 464 Lake Youngs Elementary 1965 LY 19660-142nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042 524 Martin Sortun Elementary 1987 MS 12711 SE 248th Street, Kent 98030 474 Meadow Ridge Elementary 1994 MR 27710-108th Avenue SE,Kent 98030 464 Meridian Elementary 1939 ME 25621-140th Avenue SE, Kent 98042 524 Millennium Elementary 2000 ML 11919 SE 270th Street, Kent 98030 498 Neely-O'Brien Elementary 1990 NO 6300 South 236th Street, Kent 98032 440 Panther Lake Elementary 1938 PL 20831-108th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 396 Park Orchard Elementary 1963 PO 11010 SE 232nd Street, Kent 98031 480 Pine Tree Elementary 1967 PT 27825-118th Avenue SE, Kent 98030 522 Ridgewood Elementary 1987 RW 18030-162nd Place SE, Renton 98058 504 Sawyer Woods Elementary 1994 SW 31135-228th Ave SE,Black Diamond 98010 504 Scenic Hill Elementary 1960 SH 26025 Woodland Way South, Kent 98030 464 Soos Creek Elementary 1971 SC 12651 SE 218th Place, Kent 98031 408 Springbrook Elementary 1969 SB 20035-100th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 398 Sunrise Elementary 1992 SR 22300-132nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042 504 Elementary TOTAL 13,012 Cedar Heights Middle School 1993 CH 19640 SE 272 Street,Covington 98042 923 Mattson Middle School 1981 MA 16400 SE 251st Street, Covington 98042 804 Meeker Middle School 1970 MK 12600 SE 192nd Street, Renton 98058 890 Mendian Middle School 1958 MJ 23480-120th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 790 Mill Creek MS(former Kent Jr Hi)2 2005/1952 MC 620 North Central Avenue, Kent 98032 828 Northwood Middle School 1996 NW 17007 SE 184th Street, Renton 98058 972 Middle School TOTAL 5,207 Kent-Meridian Senior High School 1951 KM 10020 SE 256th Street, Kent 98030 1,772 Kentlake Senior High School 1997 KL 21401 SE 300th Street,Kent 98042 1,986 Kentridge Senior High School 1968 KR 12430 SE 208th Street, Kent 98031 2,270 Kentwood Senior High School 1981 KW 25800-164th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 2,137 Senior High TOTAL 8,165 Kent Mountain View Academy 3 1965 LC 22420 Military Road, Des Moines 98198 416 Kent Phoenix Academy 4 1966 PH 11000 SE 264th Street, Kent 98030 350 DISTRICT TOTAL 27,150 ' Changes to capacity reflect program changes and new building additions at high schools 2 Mill Creek Middle School and Technology Academy replaced renovated Kent Junior High in 2005 3 Kent Mountain View Academy serves grades 2-12.The school was formerly known as Kent Learning Center&Grandview Elementary 4 Kent Phoenix Academy is a new non-traditional high school which opened in Fall 2007 in the former Sequoia MS building. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 3 April 2008 Page 13 0 Z o0 lc � 0 m U — s� iCOpE V c � q0 = 0)� 0 y a� Y O an C do ,a Y 7 y 1. H 'O .F. pOGQ � 0 N •0 3c m0) 0140-- Vag to 00 .. M .2 a Yu O c 0 , ' �. o.L m s L o m 0 .r. m •m u A C N W 0) 0 U U a�y� m o U� o 0 0 o m 1 o 00 gC• �W of G0 A` m m • 2 W 0 c p E C/ ui -� �G m �m `o C 20 fn mW • Y m Q m l> YN_0c — UW Cm0 0d N 6Q Lm e= • Db5 ou Y c lb ZL �>0 7 �DCM N W UW ou • W o1 YOI • �� 3:C N 22 •_ �o� .� o)E 3S aAV 44V91 O`a N Ct W o 0 Q. :22 y. o c ° Vim• mom N g� 02 y E _ v E Y 7 m "uj g >O L. m m o N m E • y C L m •C J 3S®nV 440V L ;• N N E •W N E C N m mm Nm C W U Z 2 2 •u� t 3S eAV PuZ£L 'u X W 3S aAV PuZ£l N '— cm vu • a10 s'' • c g Cc a U o� • mi" =N• �� me o Ccmm mm $C U UW ao m� c� mo �� ®m otm •=C x _m mE Q > •�C YS �� Um O� • CE 2v0,_ CU C�.•2W Cm y ,,m^^� Q�• �Qm f�/C L CW am •�W p p C3 O. vW me NW OC• g • Q •+-a 13 L cn N 3S®AV 44901 W d m N Y Q m• U p cn Q •m °W W �� cn p x oZ �cZ �o >-r C C Oa �� =Z • 3SOAV44901 3m U ��• mm xa•o C 0 +- cn = CCp p am CW wmYU O Ot •� mW N G Ci_ W E m N o x a g O +- +- N d WVm 2m cE N -� N Y WM00 10 I;z eAV I0a4ueD N O� y� ti z ADmLl 111 Aella/14S8M • • N m OQ E m N C m E W �COm N m 0 W AO h Y�Q Ike • S e4a4s�a4ui Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2008 Page 14 V Six-Year Planning and Construction Plan At the time of preparation of this Plan in spring of 2008, the following projects are completed or in the planning phase in the District: • Construction is in progress for additional classroom capacity at Kent-Meridian and Kentlake High Schools. • Sequoia Middle School was renovated and reconfigured to provide capacity for approximately 350 high school students at the new non-traditional high school, Kent Phoenix Academy in 2007-08. • Kent Junior High was renovated and renamed and opened in September 2005 as Mill Creek Middle School. Mill Creek also serves the 7-8 Kent Technology Academy program. Construction of Phase I I of the renovation of Mill Creek MS is in progress. • In February 2006, voters approved construction funding for replacement of Panther Lake Elementary School and a future Elementary School to accommodate new growth. • Enrollment projections reflect future need for additional capacity at the elementary and high school level. Future facility and site needs are reflected in this Plan. • A new site was acquired for replacement of Panther Lake Elementary. Sites for potential future schools and facilities are listed in Table 4 and shown on the site map on page 17. • Some funding is secured for purchase of additional portables and some funding may be provided by impact fees as needed. Sites are based on need for additional capacity. As a critical component of capital facilities planning, county and city planners and decision-makers are encouraged to consider safe walking conditions for all students when reviewing applications and design plans for new roads and developments. This should include sidewalks for pedestrian safety as well as bus pull-outs and turn-arounds for school buses. Included in this Plan is an inventory of potential projects and sites identified by the District which are potentially acceptable site alternatives in the future. (See Table 4) Voter approved bond issues have included funding for the purchase of sites for some of these and future schools, and the sites acquired to date are included in this Plan. Some funding is secured for purchase of additional sites but some may be funded with impact fees as needed. Not all undeveloped properties meet current school construction requirements and some property may be traded or sold to meet future facility needs. 2006 voter approval of $106M bond issue for capital improvement included the construction funding for a new elementary school, replacement of Panther Lake Elementary, and classroom additions to high schools. Some impact fees will also be applied to those projects. Student Achievement Initiative 728 funds are being utilized to reduce class size and provide extended learning opportunities. Based on community input at public hearings, the Board will continue annual review of standard of service and those decisions will be reflected in the each update of the Capital Facilities Plan. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2008 Page 15 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.415 Site Acquisitions and Projects Planned to Provide Additional Capacity Projected Projected %for , SCHOOL / FACILITY / SITE T LOCATION T e i Status Completion Program new Date Capacity Growth Approximate I Approxmate #on Map ELEMENTARY (Numbers assigned to future schools may not correlate with number of existing schools.) 13 Replacement for Panther Lake Elementary (F) SE 216th Street&102nd Ave SE Replacement Design 2009 500 21% PL Elementary Site (F) SE 216th Street&102nd Ave SE Site Planning 2008 21% Panther Lake Elementary-Replaced in 2009 SE 208 Street&108th Ave SE Replacement Planning 2009 -396 N/A Elementary#31 (F) To be determined 2 New Planning 2011-12 500 100% Site for Elementary#31 (Unfunded)' To be determined 2 Site Planning 2011-12 100% MIDDLE SCHOOL Mill Creek Middle School 620 N Central Avenue,Kent Renovation Construction 2008 828 N/A Phase II of Renovation Sequoia Middle School Renovation&Reconfiguration Renovation Planning 2007 -771 N/A for Kent Phoenix Academy SENIOR HIGH New Non-traditional High School Former Sequoia Middle School Kent Phoenix Academy (Funded) 11000 SE 264th Street,Kent Renovation Utilized 2007-08 350 100% Classroom additions at Kentlake High School (F) 21401 SE 300th Street,Kent Additions Construction 2008 171 100% Classroom additions at Kent-Meridian HS (F) 10020 SE 256th Street,Kent Additions Planning 2009 79 100% Additional TEMPORARY FACILITIES Capacity Relocatables For placement as needed New Planning 2008+ 24-31 each 100% SUPPORT FACILITIES = I Bus Facility (Unfunded)1 Near Kent-Meridian High School New Planning TBD 2 N/A #on Land Use Map 3 OTHER SITES ACQUIRED Type Jurisdiction 4 Covington area North (Near Mattson MS) SE 251&164 SE, Covington 98042 Elementary City of Covington 7 Covington area South (Scarsella) SE 290&156 SE, Kent 98042 Elementary King County 5 Covington area West (Halleson-Wikstrom) SE 256&154 SE, Covington 98042 Elementary City of Covington 3 Ham Lake area (Pollard) 16820 SE 240, Kent 98042 Elementary King County 8 SE of Lake Morton area (West property) SE 332&204 SE, Kent 98042 Secondary King County 2 Shady Lk area(Sowers,Blaine,Drahota,Paroline) 17426 SE 192 Street, Renton 98058 Elementary King County 1 So.King Co.Activity Center(Nike site) SE 167&170 SE, Renton 98058 TBD 2 King County 12 South Central site (Plemmons-Yeh-Wms) SE 286th Street&124th Ave.SE,Kent TBD 2 King County Notes: Unfunded facility needs will be reviewed in the future. 2 TBD-To be determined-Some sites are acquired but placement, timing and/or configuration have not been determined 3 Numbers correspond to sites on Map on Page 17 Other site locations are parcels identified in Table 7 on Page 27. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 4 April 2008 Page 16 ' V. y Z o C • m Cr " 0 o a C 30 m o �N • mm Ow CL O -C N W -o � bL O Y= y VCL 2� U O Om O _ID O O so U2 a, of o �2 •�• E• • Y caw ^` m C o° NW m • Y �m U • Y N m m CNC 11 L V Yw L • • 'Um c p C mO� oo u v o E , E N J Om OL w U0 O DZ •00 01 © -0 ` L •W 00 UO O m0) d 3m• OL m • �2 Cad D 3y 0 N 3S enV 4{79L ID: Ew ZO o O 2 6 N 4-0 3m• )Oc E o0 o ti E mE LLu �d y Um w ® •� vC CC _ N Cm •W Om 3S enV 4{OV l • O N y N "E U� yL •w N SW o f m m o 3S anV PuZE L c— E 3S enV PUZ£L � 2D m0 mo o$ o c �0 z iiw m 2_ ut• aL •C g cC me c •�r •gy • y � t� •� 0m m 2' mCSEmom E oao $ E Um Y= W O 'p cCm 0 'aWv Ox O U YQ> m�p NE C [ •Nm 0 Q O E $ vEro Ec ID 0 Nw IE 0E W3S enV 4{BOl Ow•DaZ Y d•W_ 0 0 0 m o f «2 `c CO Oo 2Lg• 3S enV 4{b0l N c• CC-•:E0 O• YD y CN OW Om W®C •O M yw do mm? N wad Cuci �+ v mE �0 _ ww YQ y !D • 0ny JDl{UeO N �071 • a �6y Z y Aomy61H AellDn{SeM • C• mZ mo y NOYC £ m E ra N m mm W w > Zw 0 ii E C� n� `c00 (0 Y�Q • 4 a{D{s�eluL Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2008 Page 17 V I Relocatable Classrooms For the purpose of clarification, the term "portables" and the more descriptively accurate term, "relocatables" are used interchangeably in this Plan. The Plan also references use of portables or relocatables as interim or transitional capacity/facilities. Currently, the District utilizes 131 relocatables to house students in excess of permanent capacity, for program purposes at school locations, and six for other purposes. (See Appendices A 8 C D) Based on enrollment projections, program capacity and funded permanent facilities, the District anticipates the need to purchase some additional relocatables during the next six-year period. The continually escalating cost of moving relocatables will increasingly limit the choice between building new relocatables on site and relocating older ones. During the time period covered by this Plan, the District does not anticipate that all of the District's relocatables will be replaced by permanent facilities. During the useful life of some of the relocatables, the school-age population may decline in some communities and increase in others, and these relocatables provide the flexibility to accommodate the immediate needs of the community. Portables, or relocatables, may be used as interim or transitional facilities: 1. To prevent overbuilding or overcrowding of permanent school facilities. 2. To cover the gap between the time of demand for increased capacity and completion of permanent school facilities to meet that demand. 3. To meet unique program requirements. Relocatables currently in use will be evaluated resulting in some being improved and some replaced. Quality concerns will be among those addressed by the next Community Facilities Planning Committee for review of capital facilities needs for the next bond issue. The Plan projects that the District will use relocatables to accommodate interim housing needs for the next six years and beyond. The use of relocatables, their impacts on permanent facilities, life cycle and operational costs, and the interrelationship between relocatables, emerging technologies and educational restructuring will continue to be examined. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2008 Page 18 V I I Projected Six-Year Classroom Capacity As stated in Section I V, the program capacity study is periodically updated for changes in special programs and reflects class size fluctuations in Grades K - 4. As shown in the Inventory and Capacity chart in Table 3 on Page 13, the program capacity is also reflected in the capacity and enrollment comparison charts. (See Tables 5&5 A-B-C on pages 20-23) Enrollment is electronically reported to OSPI on Form P-223 on a monthly basis and funding apportionment is based on Annual Average FTE (AAFTE). The first school day of October is widely recognized as the enrollment "snapshot in time" to report enrollment for the year. Full Time Equivalent (FTE) student enrollment for October 2007 was 25,745.42. Kindergarten students are reported at .5 although many schools provide full day kindergarten ("FDK") with alternative funding for the second half of the day. Future State-funded Full Day Kindergarten programs will report and project some Kindergarten students at 1.00 FTE at qualifying FDK schools. P-223 FTE excludes Early Childhood Education (preschool) students and College-only Running Start students. (See Tables 5&SA.B-C on pages 20-23) In October there were 645 students In 11th and 12th grade participating In the Running Start program at 10-20 different colleges and receiving credits toward both high school and college graduation. 355 of these students attended classes only at the college ("college-only") and are excluded from FTE and headcount for capacity and enrollment comparisons. Kent School District continues to be the fourth largest district in the state of Washington. P-223 Headcount for October 2007 was 26,862 with kindergarten students counted at 1.0 and excluding ECE and college-only Running Start students. A full headcount of all students enrolled in October 2007 totals 27,584 which includes ECE and college-only Running Start students. Based on the enrollment forecasts, current inventory and capacity, current standard of service, relocatable capacity, and future planned additional classroom space, the District anticipates having sufficient capacity to house students over the next six years. (See Table 5 and Tables 5 A-B-C on Pages 20-23) This does not mean that some schools will not experience overcrowding. There may be significant need for additional portables and/or new schools to accommodate growth within the District and class size reduction mandated under Student Achievement Initiative 728. Some schools, by design, may be opened with relocatables on site. Boundary changes, limited movement of relocatables, zoning changes, market conditions, and educational restructuring will all play a major role in addressing overcrowding and underutilization of facilities in different parts of the District. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2008 Page 19 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY TOTAL DISTRICT t SCHOOL YEAR 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 1 2010-2011 1 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 Actual P R O J E C T E D Permanent Program Capacit ' 26,743 27,150 27,321 27,504 27,504 28,004 28,004 Changes to Permanent Capacity ' 4 Sequoia Middle School renovated&reconfigured as Kent Phoenix Academy High School 3/4 Change to Middle School Capacity -771 4 Kent Phoenix Academy High School replaced Sequoia Middle School 4 High School Program Capacity added 350 5 Mill Creek MS Renovation-Phase 2 828 Classroom additions at Kentlake High School(F) 171 Classroom additions at Kent-Meridian High School(F) 79 Replacement with increased capacity for -396 Panther Lake Elementary (Funded) 500 Elementary#31 (Funded) 500 Permanent Program Capacity Subtotal 27,150 27,321 27,504 27,504 28,004 28,004 28,004 Interim Relocatable Ca acit Elementary Relocatable Capacity Required 0 48 192 336 24 192 504 Middle School Relocatable Capacity Required 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Senior High Relocatable Capacity Required 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Relocatable Capacity Required'a 6 0 48 192 336 24 192 504 TOTAL CAPACITY ' 27,150 27,369 27,696 27,840 28,028 28,196 28,508 TOTAL FTE ENROLLMENT/PROJECTION 2 25,745 26,064 26,480 26,564 26,743 27,014 27,363 DISTRICT AVAILABLE CAPACITY 1,405 1,305 1,216 1,276 1,285 1,182 1,145 Capacity is based on standard of service for program capacity and updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 FTE=Full Time Equivalent Enrollment (i.e.1/2 day Kindergarten student=.5&Full Day Kindergarten student=1.0 FTE) 3 In Fall 2004,9th grade moved to the high schools which increased capacity available at Middle School level. 4 Sequoia Middle School was renovated and reconfigured as Kent Phoenix Academy High School in Fall 2007. 5 Phase I I of renovation continues for Mill Creek Middle School&Kent Technology Academy. 6 2007-2008 total classroom relocatable capacity is 1,470. Kent School Distnct Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 April 2008 Page 20 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY SENIOR HIGH - Grades 9 - 12 SCHOOL YEAR 2007-2008 2008-2009 1 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 1 2013-2014 Actual P R O J E C T E D Senior High Permanent Capacity' 8,165 8,515 8,686 8,765 8,765 8,765 8,765 lChanges to High School Ca acit 4 Kent Phoenix Academy-Replaced Sequoia Middle School Estimated program capacity 350 Classroom additions at Kentlake HS(F) 171 Classroom additions at Kent-Meridian HS and KM Technology Academy°(F) 79 Subtotal 8,515 8,686 8,765 8,765 8,765 8,765 8,765 lRelocatable Capacity Required ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL CAPACITY ' 8,515 8,686 8,765 8,765 8,765 8,765 8,765 FTE ENROLLMENT/PROJECTION 2 8,407 8,368 8,522 8,418 8,351 8,335 8,429 SURPLUS DEFICIT CAPACITY 108 318 243 347 414 430 336 Number of Relocatables Required 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No Classroom Relocatables regwred at this time.Some Relocatables used for classroom and program purposes. ' Capacity is based on standard of service for program capacity and updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 FTE=Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment,excluding College-only Running Start students. 3 Grade level reconfiguration -All 9th grade students moved to the high schools in Fall 2004. 4 Sequoia Middle School was renovated and reconfigured as a new non-traditional high school, Kent Phoenix Academy, and KM added a new Technology Academy program in 2007-08. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 A April 2008 Page 21 KENT SCHOOLDISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY MIDDLE SCHOOL - Grades 7 - 8 SCHOOL YEAR 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 Actual P R O J E C T E D Middle School Permanent Capacity' 5,150 5,207 5,207 5,207 5,207 5,207 5,207 lChanges to Middle School=acit ° Mill Creek Middle School-Kent Junior High re-opened as Mill Creek Middle School Va in Fall 2005 Phase 2 of Mill Creek Renovation continues in 2007-08 Program capacity of Mill Creek MS and Kent Technology Academy 828 5 Sequoia Middle School renovated and reconfigured as Kent Phoenix Academy High School in 2007-08 MS Capacity changed to High School -771 Subtotal 5,207 5,207 5,207 5,207 5,207 5,207 5,207 lRelocatable Capacity Required ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL CAPACITY 183 5,207 5,207 5,207 5,207 5,207 5,207 5,207 FTE ENROLLMENT/PROJECTION 2 4,314 4,221 4,250 4,282 4,347 4,467 4,400 SURPLUS DEFICIT CAPACITY 893 986 957 925 860 740 807 No Classroom Relocatables required at middle schools at this time.Some Relocatables used for classroom and program purposes. ' Capacity is based on standard of service for program capacity and updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 FTE=Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment/Projection 3 Grade level reconfiguration-All 9th grade students moved to the high schools in Fall 2004. ° Mill Creek Middle School&Technology Academy- Kent Junior High was renovated and re-opened in Fall 2005 with a Technology Academy serving 7th&8th grade students from all service areas. Phase I I of Mill Creek renovation continues in 2007-08. 5 Sequoia Middle School was renovated and reconfigured as non-traditional Kent Phoenix Academy High School in 2007-08 and middle school boundaries were reconfigured for six middle schools district-wide. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 B April 2008 Page 22 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY ELEMENTARY - Grades K - 6 SCHOOL YEAR 2007-2008 2008-2009 1 2009-2010 2010-2011 1 2011-2012 2012-2013 1 2013-2014 Actual P R O J E C T E D Elementary Permanent Capacity' 13,012 13,428 13,428 13,532 13,532 14,032 14,032 Kent Mountain View Academy 2 416 lChanges to Elementary Ca aci Replacement with projected 104 net increased capacity for -396 Panther Lake Elementary (Funded)4 500 Elementary#31 (Funded)5 500 Subtotal 13,428 13,428 13,532 13,532 14,032 14,032 14,032 lRelocatable Capacity Required t 0 48 192 336 24 192 504 TOTAL CAPACITY 2 13,428 13,476 13,724 13,868 14,056 14,224 14,536 FTE ENROLLMENT/PROJECTION 3 13,024 13,475 13,708 13,864 14,045 14,212 14,534 SURPLUS DEFICIT CAPACITY 404 1 16 4 11 12 2 Number of Relocatables Required 0 2 8 14 1 8 21 21 Classroom Relocatables required in 2012-13. Some additional Relocatables used for classroom and program purposes ' Capacity is based on standard of service for program capacity and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 Kent Mountain View Academy is a special program at the former Grandview School serving students in Grades 2- 12. The school building(formerly Kent Learning Center&Grandview Elem.)was designed as an elementary school. 3 FTE=Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment or Projection(Kindergarten @.5 or 1.0&excluding ECE) Kindergarten projection is at 5 FTE for Half Day Kindergarten programs or optional Tuition-based Full Day Kindergarten Kindergarten projection is at 1 0 FTE for Full Day Kindergarten programs funded by State Apportionment,Title I or 1-728 grants 4 Panther Lake Elementary will be replaced and built on a new site with increased capacity in 2009. 5 Site selection and construction timing for Elementary#31 is pending review of location and capacity needs. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 C Apnl 2008 Page 23 V I I I Finance Plan The finance plan shown on Table 6 demonstrates how the Kent School District plans to finance improvements for the years 2008 - 2009 through 2013 - 2014. The financing components include secured and unsecured funding and impact fees. The plan is based on voter approval of future bond issues, collection of impact fees under the State Growth Management Act and voluntary mitigation fees paid pursuant to State Environmental Policy Act. Kent Elementary #27a, which opened in January 1999 as a replacement for the original Kent Elementary School, was the last elementary school for which the District received state matching funds under the state funding formula. Millennium Elementary #30 which opened in the fall of 2000 was the last elementary school constructed in the District. Voters approved a $69.5 million bond issue for Capital Construction and Improvements in February 2002. The bond issue partiallV funded building additions at three high schools which coincided with moving 9 grade students to the senior high in September 2004. The District received some state matching funds and has utilized impact fees for the senior high school additions. In February 2006, voters approved a $106 million bond issue for replacement of Panther Lake Elementary School with increased capacity to be built on a new site, as well as construction of a new elementary school to accommodate growth. The bond issue also funded Phase R of the renovation for Mill Creek Middle School and renovation of Sequoia Middle School for reconfiguration as a new non-traditional high school. Kent Phoenix Academy opened at the former Sequoia Middle School site in September 2007. 2006 construction funding approval will also provide some additional classrooms to be constructed at Kentlake and Kent-Meridian High Schools. Some impact fees will be utilized for the new construction that will increase capacity. Enrollment projections reflect future need for additional capacity at the elementary and high school level and unfunded facility needs will be reviewed in the future. Some funding is secured for additional portables and some will be funded from impact fees. For the Six-Year Finance Plan, costs of future schools are based on estimates from Kent School District Facilities Department. Please see pages 26-27 for a summary of the cost basis. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2008 Page 24 ,p O O O O O O O O O y N O O N p O co Cc w OD O In Cl) N N IIY E lL W WI dp9 O N w tH `c N N O cc y O O d y v o o NN co N } EA EA p N r O O O O O O O O Ip O O O O O O O O Q N O O V IN O O N Q 7 oZS co I� O In O Cl) In 69 04 O E9 � V J O O O O O O O O O J C o 0 0 C C C c C Q � 0 O 0 O Ion O Cl) Cl) O PIL N Lq In Fl us cq CN � ww W, CN vw N 611� M_ O O N � lA � Z• Z J E Va' o O in W N N Z 12 Q G T Z $ O � U. o 0 0 � o o w 0 to N o c N w V E!4 EA m 0 j N x a. 7 O N f0 w ZN O co coO O N C O W U N Y N 4 C a w N � N � Ia � L v E m � 3 ~� S 0 p 0 0 0o y Ocq O O C C In CO L N C 'aO O O p co ,� O N N In O p � •V N C N <O N N p' <0 a .O EA N Cl) LL d). O O O o � E N C y C coO O O O oy 0) tti In N 0 tpn OLq O IOn J C •O —Q a N (O P' In acta " y N y 01 In v< �j N I» 2 E c 4% O LL � LL LL LL LL U. LL � LLD c I� O 3 y N 7 mN EO C O �E vE, : t m V V- c In 'O N V O N U O N W I-p � C N W 17 N O > V t y C j v y X C N N J .0 C m .�. Q .�. Q LL 0 (!1 N N C m U- .- w Q II y 01 y fQ y LL ! a = c N } c 2 .� o. o. c 0 O w ocr m a� E y H Z O m m � o d w :: O F- E m O U w Y Y Y m # a ° v y in wc O O m ` Z W v N c c mc c J rc c ~ :0:( LL -00 o Y 'o ° :L. $ d gipp+ a� N E N LL m H LL CJ li aci v 'vo cc a.m E w N Q Q O- W • .- N I Q N V I I I Finance Plan - Cost Basis Summary For impact fee calculations, construction costs are based on cost of the last elementary school, adjusted for inflation, and projected cost of the next elementary school. Elementary School Cost Projected Cost Millennium Elementary #30 Opened in 2000 $12,182,768 Cost of Panther Lake Elementary Replacement (To open in 2009) $25,500,000 Projected cost of Elementary#31 in 2012 $29,750,000 Construction cost of the additions to high schools: Senior High School Additions Projected Cost Total Kent Phoenix Academy Renovations $1,650,000 2008 Addition to Kentlake High School $5,700,000 2009 Addition to Kent-Meridian HS $2,500,000 Construction cost of new HS capacity $9,850,000 Site Acquisition Cost The site acquisition cost is based on an average cost of sites purchased or built on within the last ten years. Please see Table 7 on page 27 for a list of site acquisition costs and averages. District Adjustment The impact fee calculations on pages 29 and 30 include a "District Adjustment" which is equal to the amount of increase that the impact fee formulas drive out for this year and adjusted for increase in the Consumer Price Index. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2008 Page 26 Q N a °f CD ID M ( A to Nl (fl U m 00 a0o N �+ N m R a > N a 1) y 00 U) in N a 64 E Ul� 9 63 = � Lr�m v a7 p Q 0 111 � N ° M 00 M 00 00 N Q m ti M ONO 000 U) dM' 000 tro C7 00 F- Q O O O 00 CO O It p ti e- O00 O O O CO N N O CO �- to 00 O O p w � tp � O Cl) O H Cl) LO CO 69 69 69 64 6M9 6�9 rn eMCo � U p p0 d0 M M O 00 M ¢ to ca O O) 04 M 00 o to Q O) �- N `� ccoo 0t0 M ~ M w O U) c v ° ° Z a N �N :E_ ° v°Di p Y ° 7 V •� cn O ai 00 w w p > Y N O c U N fAco O m J Y � d N N L L c J Na yO X 0po Lu c N 2 N en Nw w CO Om ko t- d m C4 N n M O O O po ` p inO O V W 'VA Q 3 7 to W N r a m a0 tl' t0 N 01 N P, m Of Z L O O 00) O 00) -a 0 m OM1 0�1 W usN V N N N N Y c } a 0 L d N O p� cm C n ^ so E y C9 a v G� rn E m o w a^� ° n m _ a°i Q L fn E m c �_ 2 c ca c y °° y ° 19 �i a c a > oo o m °r' :: v°i c c CL E ° a° m m v) o Y m ayi o ° ° o �+ c m c O O U O Y Z' O C g Y = O CL ° m 00 a�i O p v L) m m a� Q .mac a w 8 o' Z° m � E S E 0 Q L 0 >_ m rn o m m v (D 0 fn = Fi d m c ° LL '> x LIJ w Y , L L C c 'L Q m a) ° N 2 co m o o a � Y _`j _' E U 0 -1g Up Y co o 0 2 = 1 N N to 0 0 to 0 c Cl c c O C c L c L Q Z N at3 m w m m L m m M m Of c c c O m c a e co m a a = 2 m N m m m a c m > > m a > > $ `o z° 2 ° 5 o °o o > rn L1J � � � � � lD d. t7 � Op N C a) Y KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT FACTORS FOR ESTIMATED IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS Student Generation Factors -Single Family Student Generation Factors -Multi-Family x Elementary (Grades K-6) 0.445 Elementary 0.296 x Middle School (Grades 7-8) 0.118 Middle School 0.075 x Senior High (Grades 9- 12) 0.245 Senior High 0.111 x Total 0.808 Total 0.482 Student Capacity OSPI-Square Footage per Student Projected Increased S p ty q g x Elementary 500 Elementary 90 x Middle School 1,065 Middle School 117 x Senior High 550 Senior High 130 Special Education 144 Required Site Acreage per Facility x Elementary (required) 11 Average Site Cost/Acre x Middle School (required) 21 Elementary $288,346 x Senior High (required) 32 Middle School $0 Senior High $0 New Facility Construction Cost x Elementary* $29,750,000 Temporary Facility Capacity & Cost x Middle School $0 Elementary @ 24 $117,550 x Senior High * $9,850,000 Middle School @ 29 $0 *See cost basis on Pg.26 Senior High @ 31 $0 Temporary Facility Square Footage State Match Credit x Elementary 74,340 Current State Match Percentage 57.06% x Middle School 22,128 x Senior High 22,960 x Total 4% 119,428 Area Cost Allowance ACA-Cost/Sq. Ft. Area Cost Allowance(Effective July 08) $168.79 Permanent Facility Square Footage x Elementary 1,475,936 x Middle School 660,904 District Average Assessed Value x Senior High 1,107,101 Single Family Residence $316,091 x Total 96% 3,243,941 Total Facilities Square Footage District Average Assessed Value x Elementary 1,550,276 Multi-Family Residence $102,465 x Middle School 683,032 Apartments 72%Condos 28% x Senior High 1,130,061 x Total 3,363,369 Capital Levy Tax Rate/$1,000 Current /$1,000 Tax Rate(1.73255) $1.73 Developer Provided Sites/Facilities Value 0 General Obligation Bond Interest Rate Dwelling Units 0 Current Bond Interest Rate 5.11 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Apnl 2008 Page 28 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Site Acquisition Cost per Single Family Residence t Formula: ((Acres x Cost per Acre)/Facility Capacity)x Student Generation Factor Required Site Acreage I Average Site Cost/Acre I Facility Capacity I Student Factor A 1 (Elementary) 11 $288,346 500 0.445 $2,822.91 A 2 (Middle School) 21 $0 1,065 0.118 $0 A 3 (Senior High) 32 $0 1,000 0.245 $0 0.808 A c' $2,822.91 Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Single Family Residence Formula: ((Facility Cost/Facility Capacity)x Student Factor)x(Permanent/Total Square Footage Ratio) Construction Cost Facility Capacity I Student Factor I Footage Ratio B 1 (Elementary) $29,750,000 500 0.445 0.96 $25,418.40 B 2 (Middle School) $0 1,065 0.118 0.96 $0 B 3 (Senior High) $9,850,000 550 0.245 0.96 $4,212.22 0.808 B $29,630.62 Temporary Facility Cost per Single Family Residence Formula ((Facility Cost/Facility Capacity)x Student Factor)x(Temporary/Total Square Footage Ratio) Facility Cost Facility Capacity I Student Factor Footage Ratio C 1 (Elementary) $117,550 24 0.445 0.04 $87.18 C 2 (Middle School) $0 29 0.118 0.04 $0 C 3 (Senior High) $0 31 0.245 0.04 $0 0.808 C $87.18 State Match Credit per Single Family Residence Formula: Area Cost Allowance x SPI Square Feet per student x District Match% x Student Factor Area Cost Allowance I SPI Sq.Ft /Student District Match% I Student Factor D 1 (Elementary) $168.79 90 0.5706 0.445 $3,857 28 D 2 (Middle School) $168.79 117 0 0.118 $0 D 3 (Senior High) $168.79 130 0.5706 0.245 $3,067.52 D $6,924.80 Tax Credit per Single Family Residence Average SF Residential Assessed Value $316,091 Current Capital Levy Rate/$1,000 $1.73 Current Bond Interest Rate 5.11% Years Amortized (10 Years) 10 TC -t- $4,205.56 Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility/Site Value Dwelling Units 0 0 FC 0 Fee Recap A = Site Acquisition per SF Residence $2,822.91 B = Permanent Facility Cost per Residence $29,630.62 C = Temporary Facility Cost per Residence $87.18 Subtotal $32,540.71 D = State Match Credit per Residence $6,924.80 TC=Tax Credit per Residence $4,205.56 Subtotal - $11,130.36 Total Unfunded Need $21,410.35 50%Developer Fee Obligation $10,705 FC=Facility Credit(if applicable) 0 District Adjustment (See Page 26 for explanation) ($5,401) Net Fee Obligation per Single Family Residence r $5,304 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2008 Page 29 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENCE Site Acquisition Cost per Multi-Family Residence Unit Formula: ((Acres x Cost per Acre)/Facility Capacity)x Student Generation Factor Required Site Acreage I Average Site Cost/Acre I Facility Capacity Student Factor A 1 (Elementary) 11 $288,346 500 0.296 $1,877.71 A 2 (Middle School) 21 $0 1,065 0.075 $0 A 3 (Senior High) 32 $0 1,000 0.111 $0 0.482 A $1,877.71 Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Multi-Family Residence Unit Formula: ((Facility Cost/Facility Capacity)x Student Factor)x(Permanent/Total Square Footage Ratio) Construction Cost Facility Capacity I Student Factor I Footage Ratio B 1 (Elementary) $29,750,000 500 0.296 0.96 $16,907,52 B 2 (Middle School) $0 1,065 0.075 0.96 $0 B 3 (Senior High) $9,850,000 550 0.111 0.96 $1,908.39 0.482 B b $18,815.91 Temporary Facility Cost per Multi-Family Residence Unit Formula: ((Facility Cost/Facility Capacity)x Student Factor)x(Temporary/Total Square Footage Ratio) Facility Cost Facility Capacity I Student Factor I Footage Ratio C 1 (Elementary) $117,550 24 0.296 0.04 $57.99 C 2 (Middle School) $0 29 0.075 0.04 $0 C 3 (Senior High) $0 31 0.111 0.04 $0 0.482 C $57.99 State Match Credit per Multi-Family Residence Unit Formula: Area Cost Allowance x SPI Square Feet per student x District Match% x Student Factor Area Cost Allowance I SPI Sq Ft./Student 7 District Match% I Student Factor D 1 (Elementary) $168.79 90 0.5706 0.296 $2,565.74 D 2 (Middle School) $168.79 117 0 0.075 $0 D 3 (Senior High) $168,79 130 0.5706 0.111 $1,389,78 D $3,955.52 Tax Credit per Multi-Family Residence Unit Average MF Residential Assessed Value $102,465 Current Capital Levy Rate/$1,000 $1.73 Current Bond Interest Rate 5.11% Years Amortized (10 Years) 10 TC b $1,363.29 Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility/Site Value Dwelling Units 0 0 FC b 0 Fee Recap A = Site Acquisition per Multi-Family Unit $1,877.71 B = Permanent Facility Cost per MF Unit $111,815,91 C = Temporary Facility Cost per MF Unit $57.99 Subtotal $20,751.61 D = State Match Credit per MF Unit $3,955.52 TC=Tax Credit per MF Unit $1,363.29 Subtotal $5,318.80 Total Unfunded Need $15,432.81 50%Developer Fee Obligation $7,716 FC=Facility Credit(if applicable) 0 District Adjustment (See Page 26 for explanation) ($4,450) Net Fee Obligation per Multi-Family Residence Unit $3,266 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2008 Page 30 IX Summary of Changes to April 2007 Capital Facilities Plan The Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") is updated annually based on previous Plans in effect since 1993. The primary changes from the April 2007 Plan are summarized here. Voters approved funding for replacement and expansion of Panther Lake Elementary School on a new site, a future new elementary school, classroom additions at high schools to accommodate new growth, Phase II of the renovation at Mill Creek Middle School and renovation of Sequoia Middle School reconfigured as new non-traditional high school named Kent Phoenix Academy. Changes to capacity continue to reflect fluctuations in class size as well as program changes. Reduction in class size and extended learning opportunities for Student Achievement Initiative 728 are reflected in this update. Changes in relocatables (portables) or transitional capacity reflect use, purchase, sale, surplus and/or movement between facilities. The student enrollment forecast is updated annually. Methodology for six-year Kindergarten projections was modified to meet the requirements for State Funded Full Day Kindergarten programs. The district expects to receive state matching funds for projects In this Plan and tax credit factors are updated annually. Student generation factors were updated this year. Unfunded site and facility needs will be reviewed in the future. Changes to Impact Fee Calculation Factors include: ITEM Grade/Type FROM TO Comments Student Generation Factor Elem 0.444 0.445 Single Family(SF) MS 0.148 0.118 SH 0.252 0.245 Total 0.844 0.808 Biennial Update Student Generation Factor Elem 0.293 0.296 Multi-Family(MF) Ms 0.058 0.075 SH 0.094 0.111 Total 0.445 0.482 Biennial Update State Match Credit 55.94% 57.06% Per OSPI Website Area Cost Allowance (former Boeckh Index) $162.43 $168.79 Per OSPI Website Average Assessed Valuation (AV) SF $282,605 $316,091 Per Puget Sound ESD AV-Average of Condominiums &Apts. MF $89,689 $102,465 Per Puget Sound ESD Debt Service Capital Levy Rate/$1000 $1.28 $1.73 Per King Co.Assessor Report General Obligation Bond Interest Rate 4.08% 5.11% Market Rate Impact Fee-Single Family SF $5,110 $5,304 Change to fee+$194 Impact Fee- Multi-Family MF $3,146 $3,266 Change to fee+$120 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2008 Page 31 X Appendixes Appendix A: Calculations of Capacities for Elementary Schools Appendix B: Calculations of Capacities for Middle Schools Appendix C: Calculations of Capacities for Senior High Schools Appendix D: Use of Relocatables Appendix E: Student Generation Factor Survey Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2008 Page 32 M M N O) a LL O Y F x F - F F Q F. x - Q x - Q F ► Q F x Q F F ap O Z C _ N W o c E d 02 a, g N = E te P& � aM 10 n cn m Oat � (nt�+� CD N O OOi to to � M � O tvO� W [- Lo W 'o VNJ O T J M Q ttI Cl) t% to LO tf) a a M 'cl' 10 Cl) M M Lo a LO to co Lp a O t0 d' V' M t0 'o, N C O N Z pO Cm w aaU t0 c@7C E@ w@a Mu a w Wc 08) 0 tU rw O O O O O NOp Z l O o M LO O OEV- oOpI- O O O N mpN ON a VpC@ 4NC jO YC M 'E OMaOMtoO OOOOON M M LL Cl) a M p v a Ma L SN c pcV W a @ •- x O. O O O N 7 O O O O O O N O N O N O O O O N O O O O O N ci U x @ to v N y C U " o m y rn c {L O C LL O` O w Y m t cyp is O O O N O O O O O O N O a N O LO O O O N O r- O O O O N C m E J U a o a @ U C y N O Q 0 lT w O - N - a M N Co N M M N O O M O Lp � N M O M M N M O 7 o Z a _ c a/ N (n N O co N I d Ln E t>p pp tap �} pp t(�� fQp cpp v N CO Nc. O O. 7 a v d' a t00 M V U vV N a 4 M a LO to tU) @ sl' cW0 100 ^Vt LL X O a @ Cl)M C F C N Z O Q N U N rn FF_Q W 9 a ui @ Y E L m ri c u .� @ c� p cp tp ap @ N Z R G N N ro V O ED O O ao O N O M t`) N °p i) N °O t0 M °D O O j O C O m tM0 (� C N a U S' W N N 3 N O Y a = M o w r W U to O l0 N /� N M Ln a a N n to r M O M M (O M r a N O a l0 N M N Y 7 (� to C tl O O Um U Na n vLU C N 'cc E i a im p aa7V � p O N 7 V M tl � N N a2con � ttttw � `CL 0CL ° yo E E W O O M V 7 O Z co Ik. co in U t Z w F d' ,a a o �O # U wW u Vl m x a w a W to O -i a. a o w Q , U U ww z o ~c a v m co > rm O m Z t•9 E Q E u) Com w @ v ~ o w _c LL CD S o go m c @ @ Olo O ^Su ppJ, �p V'tca O N ; N W = N v W o y2 O m CL U U cm c J� O J C @ O CO � @ oR _ C @ 7 @O c II }� C @ @ `OCN C to N @ �° o t in c o a c x@ E E U W LU p xLL a AAto to W m c N 8 Y M O) m a aci o c c m CIO F. 7 N N O Z N E t� O M M co O O N N E 00) N N fO7 CO V co +m+ r co N W p O co COO tOO n CO O ^ O N N LO CN,) N U y C O m c .- N Cr O C1 W N O, J S W S W c o v Q J y 7 O M O O O W c 0 O O O O O) O O O W m O O O CD O Cp N WO' N LL d E O N N CO N C M N L~L E a0 w N N V Cc3i M N L U N •- M O M COO U'f n O �- M O O O O^1 COD N M O 7 U � N 11 O N `C O O CD h P O O O N c CV N M N a0 It X = Cl'7 a N R Z a r a W W lL N m c at J W V0 a Z m a L �d d = U m O O ,o O ^ m cco m v rn n o W O cc N O M p 0_ M eO- �2 co V o�o O � U U m U m 0 7 = o a Eo E E c y t� O O O CO N O MCD N C� CC) LO d' Cn O) mUl) cm O 7 W m 0 m 0_ L U U c rn CG �+ Of a 7 N LL7 W c O 0) O M O CD Cf)N j O e- O O GO W L C Q L c ' (� H oo co q'JW coEn O Of NN O O ao N N G UOON W CO OD c0 m ama P) co LN N dCNL U N r wMW�n Q V G a X M as o L >.a co N G U cm o CO v `� v Z U °� a N r Co Mi co W v c rn a m v N W �' 2 co ;e J O to 0 U { d 0_ U Xd d w o a) C IL=U v Q U o O to a E O s m . E (DW ayN v N O N w a ) LOZ a N c o N N U w c C m y w ui ~ ) gym`, -� V M 0) O CO O N N W C� - O n M C N to co O m O O Z 5, W m 4 Of CO �O CO C,^j w C 7 eN- Cn m V U Y U � N U m 7 N N W W _ O Q a d 12 m 7 Qw w U 0) co a in v o M w w U °o `�' U Cl)tO w w m N y L L U r c = d m N N O n m '`E Z` Ch CO aD t0 N O N Cl) Of C M N f f also co ago m IN. v N N n CO° can M c m o rn W �p CD N 7 N c O y d 7 h C O 2 E N N Cl) co O M � V M O 0) CC) � Q O M E u7 a O` M N Cl) N Cl) M N O O CO w N Z N to O O C U . $ U y W N 7 m I � � J � � � 2 � 'OY Y Y Y C7 0. 0 v y an d m y $ W E E v ots � ran C v y W v d N�►. CA Op = gy yv Ol T N =Q JQ CU C oO Q J U) U 0 4) g rnQ E .n�.` S.- LyT mm -ow = O ca O V Cl) o H NCO c 8 CO W = i p O c Q m Y Y o 8w in CD CO - i oz ° m U y m U L m _ c c rn m _ w c E m U U 2 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y co 0 O o co N W C y H � 0 O co U C m Y � D ) ! t _ USonCD ° k ) 2 a § 4 2 § o ° / k £ ! m 2 0 § m ) - ] ) G 2 OD o o a* co o o e ) \ J $ E a z § K ° D � ~ cn u - ) ` © o _ _ o _ 0 / 0 e G � p q J D $ # a Z 2 m § ° Cl) a 7 { a f { § Q e \ ) ° ) ° ° a \ k p w , k t \ N � B cli \ / k k O CL• $ o _ 3 E & z w w ) � a ° @ k § ( § a ) \ k LO � © o © - o o - 3 • ] « U 2 LL § § c - m ® m \ k w E $ $ 7 o Y $ £ @ ® % a S f% k £ 2 2 § 2 2 G m o o \ o o R © 2 � e 2 0)CM i » E E EL I 7 o o a « \ c R 0 \ \ 7 6 - ) \ { c § 0 k � � ° ° o % o o o ( & 2 a. q J § _§ m ; e @ $ or # m 2co 0§ ] « LL ' / c $ m ' @ a e / @ # v ° 0 E d © 2 © % D 0 e 3 2 § © ° .0 � ■ 2 @ CD , E 5 a 2 § c 4 co k 2 0 \ D % _ ° § 7 p m 2 f 2 » G § ccID k 2 $ m cc ° \ \ � \ coo- \ $ k D k k a a § m = s o f < e ■ 0 2 < m S Sco X ° § $ t k $ 2 0 ƒ § b 4- 2 c w 3 $ I ƒ w § ) ƒ co 00 m N T o N O n m r N M to o W W M v, 0 to O to N to n O M w 0 O W 0 V (n O O � N M O M O y S M n r r N M R r r Cl O r N N m r r r O M r r r r 0) c7 C C O C C C G C O O C O O C O O C O O t� 0 d O O U. n n n a N to O O N r O Ll O n M t0 CO CO r U) C N n n .M- .7- n O) N CO t0 O r O C r O tM O r C O r r C 2 O O 7 O 7 O O O CQ N O O C G C O C C C G O O G 6 0 O O C O O O O C O 0ca = a N N a d N (' r N M N to O O N O M w d' L C7 o n m o to O M —c N O O O W W O O 0 0 M � n � ,� � C d• CO to M V t0 to R N Q r CI' C cl M N r � � N a) w C C C O C G r G G C O C t7 0 w O O O O r C O O 0 N V/ CO to N CO n V M W N O n M co to O O o M N o n N N r n O o O m O W a M O « O n M n N o V O 0 O q n to cq r M n M tp N n c0 OR p m N co t0 r n M CO M N C C O C C C C H O O O OCD r O C O C S N N N N M n N tr0 O) ct i C', to 2 N N N N M O) � r � N N r C CNO N N O V) 0 O N N N O N C r � n 01 N to O 2 � N Z CD 0I (O n n O V O) O r O r M co O � O m N r N n Uo W r ro t v n N O v n N 0 n m w N n N N o v r M o �. .. JJ m L QLL co x ) O M N r- co M CO� M N 1A O CO Lo M co n N T- Z JcaW O _ _ a CL O M o n CO tD T vr N wr nr r cOOMp c M O O r _ M n v (O m 00 � rr i -r N N U aD r U) � z � Z O U w w 3: -' w 3: O 3: 3: (D O S S 2 S J J w a U m m N N U S U Z U E U W 0 LL m Y w w c 0 0 H psp C rn N E w 3 1 m Q o Y E a O � c Q � -o Z 2 C N > > c C LL g )ce a) m �i d c m rn y aci y Y o. �E H c a Y 0) Y _� > Y Y c Y y o U a� y' in c c f[1 Y c Y O N O N « 5 U « LL c a� Y Z U U c c •� E CD c" E U } C) c Y y lL « o LL EC c Q a x y m c U E N N m t 3 c w v :F+ t o ; ° o. Q c _C w a`0i w - '0 Mmoo M M Q F°- o a Y c m D 2 v o " i` x U Q °o O o _m a cc U U m y o c m d d c ° o a V a E E c � 0 77 E v N N N N lC L O f0 L L 'O 10 f6 O 7 U Q� U w LL LL Y 0. cc to F- I- F- 1- a a m LL d w in fA fA ap n cD O O Of O Of 1� f0 n O t0 N ��pp d' N t7 N � DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE for Kent School District No. 415 2008 Capital Facilities Plan Issued with a 14-day comment and appeal period. Description of Proposal: This threshold determination analyzes the environmental impacts associated with the following actions, which are so closely related to each other that they are in effect a single action: 1. The adoption of the Kent School District 2008 Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan by the Kent School District for the purposes of planning for the facilities needs of the District. 2. The amendment of the King County Comprehensive Plan to include the Kent School District 2008 Capital Facilities Plan as a part of the Capital Facilities Plan Element of the King County Comprehensive Plan. 3. The amendment of the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Kent to include the Kent School District's 2008 Capital Facilities Plan as part of the Capital Facilities Plan Element of the Comprehensive Plans of the City of Kent. 4. The amendment of the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Covington to include the Kent School District's 2008 Capital Facilities Plan as part of the Capital Facilities Plan Element of the Comprehensive Plans of the City of Covington. 5. The amendment of the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Auburn to include the Kent School District's 2008 Capital Facilities Plan as part of the Capital Facilities Plan Element of the Comprehensive Plans of the City of Auburn. 6. The amendment of the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Renton to include the Kent School District's 2008 Capital Facilities Plan as part of the Capital Facilities Plan Element of the Comprehensive Plans of the City of Renton. 7. This proposal may also involve amendment of Comprehensive Plans of the Cities of Maple Valley, Black Diamond, and/or SeaTac to incorporate the Kent School District 2008 Capital Facilities Plan into the Capital Facilities element of that jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan. Proponent: Kent School District Location of the Proposal: The Kent School District includes an area of approximately 72 square miles. The City of Covington and portions of the cities of Kent, Auburn, Renton, Black Diamond, Maple Valley, and SeaTac fall within the District's boundaries, as do parts of unincorporated King County. Lead Agency: Kent School District No. 415 is the lead agency pursuant to WAC 197-11-926. The lead agency for this proposal has determined that the proposal does not pose a probable significant adverse impact to the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030 (2) (c). This decision was made after a review of the completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public upon request. This Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date of issue. Comments must be submitted by 4:00 p.m., June 24, 2008. The responsible official will reconsider the DNS based on timely comments and may retain, modify, or, if significant adverse impacts are likely, withdraw the DNS. If the DNS is retained, it will be final after the expiration of the comment deadline. Responsible Official: Fred . igh Assistant Superintendent for Business Services Kent School District No. 415 Telephone: (253) 373-7295 Address: 12033 SE 256th Street#A-600 Kent, Washington 98030-6643 Appeals of this determination are governed by Board Policy No. 9280 which can be obtained from Fred High, Assistant Superintendent for Business Services, Kent School District No. 415, 12033 SE 256th Street#A-600, Kent, Washington 98030-6643 and pursuant to WAC 197-11- 680 and RCW 43.21 C.075. Date of Issue: June 10, 2008 Date Published: June 14, 2008 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAC 197-11-960 Environmental Checklist. Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21 C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or"does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply" In addition, complete the Supplemental Sheet for nonproject actions (part D). �i For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "prepares," and "affected geographic area," respectively. 1 A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: The adoption of a six-year Capital Facilities Plan by the Kent School District. The Comprehensive Plans of King County, City of Kent, City of Covington, City of Renton, City of Auburn and possibly Cities of Maple Valley, Black Diamond and SeaTac have been and/or will be amended to include the Kent School District 2008 Capital Facilities Plan in the Capital Facilities Plan Element of each jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan. A copy of the District's Plan is available for review in the District Finance & Planning Department. 2. Name of applicant: Kent School District No. 415. 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Kent School District No. 415 12033 SE 256th Street #A-600 Kent, WA 98030-6643 Contact Person: Fred H. High, Assistant Superintendent for Business Services Telephone: (253) 373-7295 4. Date checklist prepared: May 27, 2008 5. Agency requesting checklist: Kent School District No. 415 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): The 2008 Kent School District Capital Facilities Plan is scheduled to be adopted in July, 2008 and forwarded to King County, Cities of Kent, Covington, Auburn, Renton, Maple Valley, Black Diamond, and SeaTac for possible inclusion in each jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan. The Capital Facilities Plan will be updated annually. Site-specific projects have been or will be subject to project-specific environmental review. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. The Capital Facilities Plan reviews additions to existing high schools, renovations at Mill Creek Middle School and Kent Phoenix Academy, and proposes construction replacing Panther Lake Elementary School and construction of a new elementary school. 2 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. The above-referenced projects will undergo environmental review at the time of formal proposal. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. King County and Cities of Kent, Covington and Auburn will review and approve the Capital Facilities Plan for the purposes of impact fee ordinances and will need to adopt the Plan as an amendment to the Capital Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of King County and Cities of Kent, Covington, Renton and Auburn. Cities of Maple Valley, Black Diamond, and SeaTac may also review and approve the Plan for the purposes of any school impact fee ordinances and may adopt the Plan as an amendment to the Capital Facilities element of their Comprehensive Plans. 11. Give a brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) This is a non-project action. This proposal involves the adoption of the Kent School District 2008 Capital Facilities Plan for the purpose of planning the facilities needs of the District and for inclusion in the Capital Facilities Plan element and possible amendment of the Comprehensive Plans for King County, City of Covington, City of Kent, City of Renton, City of Auburn, City of SeaTac, City of Maple Valley and City of Black Diamond. A copy of the Capital Facilities Plan may be viewed at the Kent School District Business Services Department office. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, ' provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The 2008 Capital Facilities Plan will affect the Kent School District. The District includes an area of approximately 72 square miles. The City of Covington, and portions of the Cities of Kent, Auburn, Renton, Black Diamond, Maple Valley, SeaTac and parts of unincorporated King County fall within the District's boundaries. 3 1 B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ' 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other The Kent School District is comprised of a variety of topographic land forms and gradients, including all of those listed. Specific topographic characteristics will be identified during the planning and permit process for each capital project. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Specific slope characteristics will be identified during the planning and permit process for each capital project. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Specific soil types will be identified during the planning and permit process for each capital project. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Unstable soils may exist within the Kent School District. Specific soil limitations on individual project sites will be identified at the time of environmental review. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading ' proposed. Indicate source of fill. Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be subject to project- specific environmental review and local approval at the time of proposal. Proposed grading projects, as well as the purpose, type, quantity, and source of fill materials will be identified as appropriate to each project. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. ' It is possible that erosion could occur as a result of construction projects currently proposed in the Capital Facilities Plan. Individual projects and their erosion impacts ' will be evaluated on a site-specific basis. Individual projects will be subject to environmental review and local approval on the time of proposal. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after 1 project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings?) Percentage of impervious cover will vary with each capital facilities project and will be addressed during project-specific environmental review. 4 h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: ' Erosion potential on individual project sites will be addressed during project-specific environmental review. Relevant erosion reduction and control requirements will be met. ' 2. Air 1 a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. ' Various emissions, many construction-related, may result from individual projects. Air-quality impacts will be evaluated during project-specific environmental review. ' Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. ' Off-site sources and necessary mitigation will be addressed during project-specific environmental review. ' c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: ' Plans for individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject to environmental review and relevant local approval processes, including obtaining of any necessary air quality permits, at the time individual projects are ' formally proposed. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 3. Water ' a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. ' There is a network of surface water bodies within the Kent School District. The surface water regimes and flow patterns have been or will be researched and incorporated in the design of each individual project. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) ' the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Some projects may require work near these described waters. Individual projects in the Capital Facilities Plan will be subject to environmental review and local approval requirements at the time the project is formally proposed. 5 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that ' would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Information with respect to placement or removal of fill or dredge material will be addressed at the time of project-specific environmental review. Applicable local regulations have been or will be satisfied. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Any surface water withdrawals or diversions have been or will be addressed ' during project-specific environmental review. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on , the site plan. Each capital facilities project, if located in a floodplain area, will be required to , meet applicable local regulations for flood areas. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface ' waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. Specific information regarding discharges of waste materials, if any, will be addressed during project-specific environmental review. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground , water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may impact ground , water resources. Each project will be evaluated during project-specific environmental review. Applicable local regulations have been or will be satisfied. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. , Impacts of discharged waste material, if any, have been or will be addressed during site-specific, project-level environmental review. 6 ' ' c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may have varying storm water runoff consequences. Each project will be subject to environmental review and applicable local regulations. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. ' Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will have varying environmental impacts and will be subject to appropriate review and local regulations prior to construction. Information regarding waste materials will be presented at the time of such review. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Specific measures to reduce or control runoff impacts have been or will be developed on a project-specific basis in cooperation with the appropriate jurisdiction. 4. Plants: a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other ' water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation There are various vegetative zones within the Kent School District. An inventory of species has been or will be produced as part of project-specific environmental review. b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? ' Impacts on vegetation will be determined at the time of project-specific environmental review at the time the project is formally proposed. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Specific impacts to these species from individual projects has been or will be determined at the time of project proposal and will be addressed during site-specific, project-level environmental review. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or 1 enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be subject to ' environmental review and local approval at the time of project proposal. 5. Animals: , a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: , An inventory of species observed on or near sites has been or will be developed ' during project-specific environmental review. b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Specific impacts to these species from individual projects will be determined at the , time of project proposal and will be reviewed in cooperation with the affected jurisdictions. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. ' Impacts on migration routes, if any, will be addressed during site-specific, project- ' level environmental review. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Appropriate measures to preserve or enhance wildlife have been or will be , determined at the time of site-specific, project-level environmental review. 8 ' 6. Energy and Natural Resources: a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar)will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. 1 The State Board of Education requires a life-cycle cost analysis of all heating, lighting, and insulating systems prior to allowing specific projects to proceed. Energy needs will be decided at the time of specific engineering and site design planning. ' Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe: Individual projects of this Capital Facilities Plan will be evaluated as to their impact on the solar potential of adjacent projects during environmental review. ' c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: LEnergy conservation measures will be considered at the project-specific design phase and environmental review. 7. Environmental Health: a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. ' Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Proposed projects will comply with all current codes, standards, and rules and regulations. Individual projects have been or will be subject to environmental ' review and local approval at the time of formal submittal. b. Noise: 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? A variety of noises exist within the Kent School District. Specific noise sources have been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review. 9 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with ' the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Normal construction noises would exist on a short-term basis during school construction. There could be an increase in traffic or operations-related noise which would be addressed during project specific environmental review. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: ' Project noise impacts have been or will be evaluated and mitigated during the ' project-specific environmental review. Each project is or will be subject to applicable local regulations. 8. Land and Shoreline Use: ' a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? 1 There are a variety of land uses within the Kent School District, including residential, commercial, industrial, institutional, utility, agricultural, forestry, open space, recreational, etc. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. , This question will be addressed during site-specific, project-level environmental review. , c. Describe any structures on the site. Structures located on proposed sites have been or will be identified and described , during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? , Structures to be demolished, if any, will be identified as part of the project-specific environmental review process. , e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? There are a variety of zoning classifications within the Kent School District. Site , specific zoning information has been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? An inventory of comprehensive plan designations has been or will be completed during project-specific environmental review. 10 g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? ' Any shoreline master program designations have been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Environmentally sensitive areas, if any, will be identified during project-specific environmental review. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? This information has been or will be provided at the time of project-specific environmental review. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? It is not anticipated that proposed projects will displace any people. Displacement of people, if any, will be evaluated during project-specific environmental review. ' k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be subject to project- specific environmental review and local approval at the time the project is formally proposed. I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Compatibility of the proposal and specific projects with existing uses and plans have been or will be assessed as part of the comprehensive planning process and during project-specific environmental review. 9. Housing: a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. No housing units would be provided. 1 b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Any impact of project proposals on existing housing have been or would be evaluated during project-specific environmental review procedures. 1 c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: , Measures to reduce or control any housing impacts have been or will be addressed during site-specific, project-level environmental review. , 10. Aesthetics: a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Aesthetic impacts have been or will be determined at the time of site-specific, project- level environmental review. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Aesthetic impacts have been or will be determined at the time of site-specific, project- t level environmental review. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: ' Appropriate measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts have been or will be determined at the time of project-specific environmental review. , 11. Light and Glare: a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? , Light or glare impacts have been or will be determined at the time of project-specific environmental review. , b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Light or glare impacts have been or will be determined at the time of project-specific ' g 9 p p J p environmental review. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Off-site sources of light or glare have been or will be evaluated at the time of project , specific environmental review. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: ' Mitigation of light and glare impacts has been or will be addressed during project- specific environmental review. is 12. Recreation: a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? There are a variety of formal and informal recreational facilities within the Kent School District. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, ' describe. Recreational impacts have been or will be addressed during project specific environmental review. Projects in the Capital Facilities Plan may enhance recreational opportunities and uses. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Any adverse effects on recreation stemming from individual project proposals have been or will be subject to mitigation during the environmental review procedure. A school site usually provides recreational facilities to the community in the form of additional play fields and gymnasiums. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation: a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. The existence of historic and cultural resources will be determined at the time of project-specific environmental review. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. An inventory of historical sites has been or will be conducted as part of project specific environmental review. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Appropriate measures have been or will be proposed on a project-specific basis. 14. Transportation: 1 a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Impact on public streets and highways has been or will be assessed during project- specific environmental review. 13 b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance , to the nearest transit stop? The relationship between specific projects and public transit has been or will be assessed during project-specific environmental review. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would , the project eliminate? An inventory of parking spaces and the impacts of specific projects on parking , spaces has been or will be conducted during project-specific environmental review. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). The development of new schools may require new access roads or streets. This issue will be fully addressed during project-specific environmental review. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of)water, rail, or air ' transportation? If so, generally describe. Use of water, rail or air transportation has been or will be addressed during site- specific, project-level environmental review. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Each project proposal has been or will be separately evaluated as to traffic impacts. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Mitigation of impacts on transportation has been or will be addressed during project- , specific environmental review. 15. Public Services: , a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: ' fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. The District does not anticipate that the projects identified in the Capital Facilities Plan will substantially increase the need for other public services. Impacts have been or will be evaluated on a project-specific basis. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Schools are built with automatic security systems, fire alarms, smoke alarms, heat sensors and sprinkler systems. 14 r 16. Utilities: a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. Utilities available at project sites have been or will be identified during project specific renvironmental review. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. r Utility revisions and construction needs will be identified during project-specific environmental review. ' C. SIGNATURE ' The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. rSignature: Fred hh ssistant Supers ent for Business Services Date Submitted: June 10, 2008 r r r r r r r r 15 r D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. ' 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? To the extent this Plan makes it more likely that school facilities will be constructed, and/or renovated or remodeled, some of these environmental impacts will be more likely. Additional impermeable surfaces, such as roofs, parking lots, sidewalks, access roads and playgrounds will increase storm water runoff, which could enter surface or ground water. Emissions to air could result from heating systems, 1 emergency generators and other equipment, and from additional car and bus trips to and from the school for students and faculty. Any emissions resulting from this Plan should not require the production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous 1 substances, with the possible exception of storage of diesel fuel or gasoline for emergency generating equipment. Noise may result from additional traffic and from concentrating several hundred children at a new facility, especially before and after school and during recesses. To the extent this proposal allows additional residential development to occur, these impacts would also increase somewhat, but it is not possible to quantify those impacts at this time. The impacts would depend on the type, location and distribution of housing, for example, whether single or multiple family and the location of the school. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Facilities implementing the Plan have been or will be evaluated at the project specific level and impacts will be mitigated accordingly. Storm water detention and runoff will meet applicable County and/or City requirements and, depending on the date of actual construction, may be subject to a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ("NPDES") permitting requirements. Discharges to air will be minimal, and will meet any applicable requirements of the Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Authority. Fuel oil will be stored according to local and state requirements. 16 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? The Plan itself will have no impact on these elements of the environment. Depending on the particular site, construction of facilities may require clearing sites of plants and , loss of animal habitat. To the extent residential development is allowed, additional area may be cleared and eliminated as habitat for animals. There are not likely to be any impacts on fish or marine life, although some water quality degradation in streams and rivers could occur due to increased residential development. These impacts have been or will be addressed in more detail during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: Individual projects will be evaluated and mitigated appropriately on a project-specific basis, but specific mitigation proposals cannot be identified at this time. 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? , Any actual projects resulting from this Plan would consume heating fuel and electrical energy. Increased traffic resulting from the construction of additional facilities would consume petroleum based fuels. Reduced traffic resulting from construction of another neighborhood school may also reduce amounts of fuel consumed, but it is not possible to quantify such reduction in consumption at this time. These impacts have been or will be addressed in more detail during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: 1 Facilities would be constructed in accordance with applicable energy efficiency standards. 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study)for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? The Plan and facilities constructed pursuant to the Plan should have no impact on these resources. It is not possible to predict whether other development made possible by this Plan would affect sensitive areas. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: No specific measures are being proposed at this time. Appropriate measures have been or will be proposed during project-specific review, Annual updates of this Plan will be coordinated with King County, Cities of Kent, Covington, Auburn, SeaTac, Renton and Black Diamond as part of the Growth Management Act process, one of the purposes of which is to protect environmentally sensitive areas. To the extent the School District's facilities planning process is part of the overall growth management , planning process, these resources are more likely to be protected. 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? The Plan will not have any impact on land or shoreline use that is incompatible with existing comprehensive plans, land use codes, or shoreline management plans. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: None are proposed at this time. Actual facilities constructed to implement the Plan will be sited and constructed to avoid or reduce land use impacts. 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? This proposal should not create substantial new demands for transportation. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may create an increase in traffic near new District facilities but also reduce traffic by creating the opportunity for more students to walk to a closer school. The construction of the facilities included in the Capital Facilities Plan may result in minor increases in the demand for public services and utilities, such as fire and police protection, and water, sewer, and electric utilities. None of these impacts are likely to be significant. The impacts on transportation and public services and utilities of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be addressed during project-level review when appropriate. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: No measures to reduce or respond to such demands are proposed at this time. 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. The Kent School District Capital Facilities Plan will not conflict with any laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. 18 t t t t t FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2009 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN t BOARD OF EDUCATION Ed Barney Amye Bronson-Doherty Tony Moore Suzanne Smith Vacant Position t SUPERINTENDENT Thomas R. Murphy t t t t FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2009 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN t TABLE OF CONTENTS ' TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 2-3 SECTION 1 THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Introduction 4 t Inventory of Educational Facilities 5 Inventory of Non-Instructional Facilities 6 Needs Forecast- Existing Facilities 7 Needs Forecast-New Facilities 8 Six Year Finance Plan 9 SECTION 2 MAPS OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES Introduction 11 Map - Elementary Boundaries 12 Map - Middle school Boundaries 13 Map - Senior High Boundaries 14 SECTION 3 SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION Introduction 15 Building Capacities 16-17 Portable Locations 18-19 Student Forecast 20-22 Capacity Summaries 23-27 King County Impact Fee Calculations 28-30 SECTION 4 SUMMARY OF CHANGES FROM THE 2008 31-33 t PLAN t t j t t FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2009 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN INTRODUCTION In response to the requirements of the State of Washington Growth Management Act (SHB 2929 (1990) and ESHB 1025 (1991)), and under the School Impact Fee Ordinances of King County Code 21A, City of Federal Way Ordinance No. 95-249 effective December 21, 1995 as amended, City of Kent Ordinance No. 3260 effective March 1996, and the City of Auburn Ordinance No. 5078 effective 1998, Federal Way Public Schools has updated its 2008 Capital Facilities Plan as of May 2009 This Plan is scheduled for adoption by King County, the City of Kent, City of Federal Way and the City of Auburn and is incorporated in the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction by reference. This plan is also included in the Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. To date, the City of Des Moines has not adopted a school impact fee ordinance. The City of Des Moines collects school impact 1 fees as part of the SEPA process. The Growth Management Act requires the County to designate Urban Growth areas within which urban growth can be encouraged. The Growth Management Planning Council adopted and recommended to the King County Council four Urban Growth Area Line Maps with designations for urban centers. A designation was made within the Federal Way planning area, which encompasses Federal Way Public Schools boundaries. King County will encourage and actively support the development of Urban Centers to meet the region's need for housing, jobs, services, culture and recreation. This Plan's estimated population growth is prepared with this underlying assumption. This Capital Facilities Plan will be used as documentation for any jurisdiction, which requires its use to meet the needs of the Growth Management Act. This plan is not intended to be the sole planning tool for all of the District needs. The District may prepare interim plans consistent with Board policies. The District has prepared a multi phase plan for the renovation and construction of Federal Way Schools and support buildings. The Board authorized presenting the $149 million bond on May 15, 2007. The bond, passed at 63.93%,will replace four elementary schools, Lakeland, Panther Lake, Sunnycrest and Valhalla and one middle school Lakota. Plans to replace Federal Way High School and Decatur High School and to increase p Y g g capacity by approximately 400 students at each school are planned in later phases. Federal Way High School was built in 1938. It has been added onto at least 10 times and currently has an almost maze-like layout. Based on an annual 4% increase in construction cost, the estimated cost to rebuild Federal Way High School is $122 million. Because of continued construction inflation, estimated construction costs will be re- calculated prior to the next bond election. None of the cost to replace Federal Way or Decatur High School is included in the Impact Fee calculation in this Plan 2 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2009 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN The non-instructional projects included in the plan will consolidate support services operations at a single location. The current Transportation and Maintenance facility cannot continue to meet the District needs in the future. Nutrition services and other administrative functions will also relocate to this centralized location. In September 2007 Woodmont Elementary School began a K-8 program by adding a bch grade. In the 2008/09 school year Woodmont will add a 71h grade to this program. In March 2008, the Board approved a second K-8 program at Nautilus Elementary School. Nautilus will begin the 2008/09 school year with K-61h grade. As the program grows there will more data available about the unique facility needs for this grade configuration. The District is opening a new school in September 2008. The Technology Access Foundation(TAF) Academy will provide a small school setting for 6`h through 121h grade students. This academy is funded through a unique public/private partnership between the Technology Access Foundation and Federal Way Public Schools. The focus of the school is Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM). The TAF Academy will open in September of 2008 with students in grades 6, 7 and 9. Additional grades will be added in successive years with a target population of about 350. The TAF Academy will open in a separate facility on the Totem Campus. The District will purchase and site new portables this summer to house 10 classrooms. A current modular portable structure with four classrooms will become part of the TAF facility. The impacts to capacity span middle school and high school. At full enrollment, the TAF Academy will help to lessen some of the high school capacity deficiency. The capacity increases are noted in the Capital Facilities Plan 2008/09 school year. The District continues to study school boundaries as new housing and fluctuating populations impact specific schools. Some shifts in boundaries may be required in the coming year. j t 3 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2009 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 1 -THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN The State Growth Management Act requires that several pieces of information be gathered to determine the facilities available and needed to meet the needs of a growing community. This section provides information about current facilities, existing facility needs, and expected future facility requirements for Federal Way Public Schools. A Financial Plan that shows expected funding for any new construction, portables and modernization listed follows this. 4 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2009 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN INVENTORY OF EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS Adelaide 1635 SW 304th Street Federal Way 98023 Brigadoon 3601 SW 336th Street Federal Way 98023 Camelot 4041 S 298th Street Auburn 98001 Enterprise 35101 5th Avenue SW Federal Way 98023 Green Gables 32607 47th Avenue SW Federal Way 98023 Lake Dolloff 4200 S 308th Street Auburn 98001 Lake Grove 303 SW 308th Street Federal Way 98023 Lakeland 35827 32nd Avenue S Auburn 98001 Mark Twain 2450 S Star Lake Road Federal Way 98003 Meredith Hill 5830 S 300th Street Auburn 98001 Mirror Lake 625 S 314`h Street Federal Way 98003 Nautilus 1000 S 289th Street Federal Way 98003 Olympic View 2626 SW 327th Street Federal Way 98023 Panther Lake 34424 1st Avenue S Federal Way 98003 Rainier View 3015 S 368th Street Federal Way 98003 Sherwood Forest 34600 12th Avenue SW Federal Way 98023 Silver Lake 1310 SW 325th Place Federal Way 98023 Star Lake 4014 S 270th Street Kent 98032 Sunnycrest 24629 42nd Avenue S Kent 98032 Twin Lakes 4400 SW 320th Street Federal Way 98023 Valhalla 27847 42nd Avenue S Auburn 98001 Wildwood 2405 S 300th Street Federal Way 98003 Woodmont 26454 16th Avenue S. Des Moines 98198 MIDDLE SCHOOLS Federal Way Public Academy 34620 91h Avenue S Federal Way 98003 Illahee 36001 1st Avenue S Federal Way 98003 Kilo 4400 S 308th Street Auburn 98001 Lakota 1415 SW 314th Street Federal Way 98023 Sacajawea 1101 S Dash Point Road Federal Way 98003 Saghalie 33914 19th Avenue SW Federal Way 98023 Sequoyah 3450 S 3601h ST Auburn 98001 Totem 26630 401h Ave S Kent 98032 TAF Academy 26630 401h Ave S Kent 98032 SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS Decatur 2800 SW 320th Street Federal Way 98023 Federal Way 30611 16th Avenue S Federal Way 98003 Thomas Jefferson 4248 S 288th Street Auburn 98001 Todd Beamer 35999 16th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Harry S Truman 31455 28th Ave S Federal Way 98003 ALTERNATIVE SCHOOLS Merit School 36001 1"Ave S Federal Way 98003 LEASED SPACES Internet Academy 32020 1st Ave S Federal Way 98003 5 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2009 CAPITAL FA CILITIES PLAN CURRENT INVENTORY NON-INSTRUCTIONAL FACILITIES Developed Property Administrative Building 31405 18th Avenue S Federal Way 98003 MOT Site 1066 S 320th Street Federal Way 98003 Central Kitchen 1344 S 308th Street Federal Way 98003 Federal Way Memorial Field 1300 S 308th Street Federal Way 98003 Leased Space Community Resource Center 1813 S Commons Federal Way 98003 Available Office Space 30819 141h Ave S Federal Way 98003 Undeveloped Property Site# Location 75 SW 360th Street & 3rd Avenue SW—9.2 Acres 65 S 351st Street & 52nd Avenue S— 8.8 Acres 60 E of loth Avenue SW - SW 334th & SW 335th Streets - 10.04 Acres 73 N of SW 3201h and east of 45th PL SW—23.45 Acres 71 S 344th Street & 46th Avenue S - 17.47 Acres 82 1"Way S and S 342"d St—Minimal acreage 74 3737 S 3601h St - 47.13 Acres (Part of this site is being used for Sequoyah Middle School) 96 S 308th St and 141h Ave S — .36 Acres 81 S 332"d St and 9th Ave S—20 Acres Notes: Not all undeveloped properties are large enough to meet school construction requirements. Properties may be traded or sold depending on what locations are needed to house students in the District. 6 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2009 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN NEEDS FORECAST- EXISTING FACILITIES EXISTING FACILITY FUTURE NEEDS ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF FUNDS Purchase and Relocate Interim Capacity Anticipated source of funds is Portables Impact Fees. Elementary Schools: Replace Existing Buildings Voter approved bonds. Lakeland, Panther Lake, Increase capacity at Lakeland, Sunnycrest and Valhalla Panther Lake, Sunnycrest and Valhalla by a total of 200 seats Lakota Middle School Replace Existing Building Voter approved bonds Federal Way High School Replace Existing Building, Future bond authorization Increase Capacity Decatur High School Replace Existing Building, Future bond authorization. Increase Capacity The District is also planning the replacement of some non-instructional facilities. The District has purchased 20 acres (Site #81) for construction of consolidated facilities for support services functions. Transportation, Nutrition Services, Maintenance and other non-instructional functions will be housed at this centralized location. As part of the multi phase plan, the District intends to increase capacity for high school students with expansion at the Decatur High School site. Increased capacity at Federal Way High and at Decatur High in later phases supplant the need for construction of a fifth comprehensive high school. 7 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2009 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 1 NEEDS FORECAST-ADDITIONAL FACILITIES NEW FACILITY LOCATION ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF FUNDS No current plans for additional facilities. i � 8 O p p Cp O O S 0 0 0 S O � fiH 69 fi9 b9 H9 � ell F Q\ O, N O O O O O O O O O O O a\ O, N Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 O O M N M �n C 0 0 C 0 C C C C C O O r-7 00 O O O O _ O O 00 V+ 0 0 0 0 0 W O M M 0 in M O O O �O y� Nl{ 01 01 v1 Vl O Vl e V N �•,� N 0\ MV3 N N OpG O ON ^ ^ 7 ON 'r V9 b4 (H F O Vj 69 69 fH b9 fig N V5 N N A N C 1--- CD UN' y Ncn ° u vi 'a' Fpp E 1. ~ 'L� a O „a0 x 0 N .t.. z N p y E y y0 ro %p N oo oA _ P^4 a .N`, o o a 1�1 O N O M bD mj C `� ro Qq V) .i.l r � ❑ � � 7 A 2�Ry O O O _� M CO V to V C Na Q ~, C ~ O O O a ❑ % L O C N M ? G N O M 69 M � G r0 G 0 O w L in I-rl p O O 0 N 1. is a oSSoIn O O O O O N p N O V 'eL D Cj p O O o 0 0 0 0 0 U a eo = > E b °c �1r bA d o�y 12 o v � � Go) Cl e o+r- � c x v W N cflvi � ro A �c 59 " °' in croon w c o 0 3 0o U O C us m y W N 1. V y 65 U a�i N mm o c °' wo ro Q ^ > 5 u W o o ro ,c � a 5 Z ° y m 00 ZU2: C ^ � � y O " � E `\ y v � y u o v •°'. axi � 2, E. Z — FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2009 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 2 - MAPS OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES Federal Way Public Schools (the District) has twenty-one elementary schools (grades K- 5), two schools with a K-8 grade configuration, seven middle school schools (grades 6-8), five senior high schools (grades 09-12). The Federal Way Public Academy serves students in grades 6 -10. The Internet Academy serves grades K-12 and the TAF Academy will serve students in grades 6-12. The TAF Academy serves students in the Totem Middle School service area in grades 6-12. The following maps show the service area boundaries for each school, by school type. (Harry S. Truman High School, Merit School, Internet Academy and Federal Way Public Academy serve students from throughout the District). The identified boundaries are reviewed annually. Any change in grade configuration or adoption of programs that affect school populations may necessitate a change in school service areas. The Growth Management Act requires that a jurisdiction evaluate if the public facility infrastructure is in place to handle new housing developments. In the case of most public facilities, new development has its major impact on the facilities immediately adjacent to that development. School Districts are different. If the District does not have permanent facilities available, interim measures must be taken until new facilities can be built or until boundaries can be adjusted to match the population changes to the surrounding facilities. Adjusting boundaries requires careful consideration by the District and is not taken lightly. It is recognized that there is a potential impact on students who are required to change schools. Boundary adjustments impact the whole district, not just one school. It is important to realize that a single housing development does not require the construction of a complete school facility. School districts are required to project growth throughout the district and build or adjust boundaries based on growth throughout the district, not just around a single development. ELEMENTARY SCHOOL BOUNDARIES • • -- - - Pea 4-on P nlruiaw.,l rmr�ar G H Federal Way Public Schools - = + r'=` °"'--- -- , ErMStudent,a Heider n.. uwm �• a , \ ' ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS MIDDLE SCHOOLS, Code— ■ Code— a. 1 Adelaide CA 30 INehoo E•8 i a 2 Srigadoan 0•8 31 Kilo G,e 1 ' p �• `+ . 12 3 Camelot G•6 32 Lakota 0-6 3 " 4 Enterprise 0•0 33 SacaJawea E-B •°++i + i° r. °` 6 Gmen Gables A-7 34 Soghalle 6 Lake Dalian 0-6 36 Totem G•3 °bVM1 7 Lake Grove 0-6 36 Federal Way Public Academy E-8 8 Lakeland E-0 •} :� 0 Madt7Wfeln F•4 1 10 Meredith Hill H-6 .11 Mirror Lake E•8 SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS a 12 HauSlue E-6 Code— ■ 3 i " ` + J 3 13 Olympic View C-7 ,• "' i 14 Panthertake E-8 40 Decatur C� Ili Rainier view F•10 n o 41 Federal Way - a Ili BherYvOod Forest D 8 E6 17 SNver Lake D 7 42 Thomas Jeffersonson E-9 €e 4 10-4 8 Star Lake G 3 46 Todd Deemer E•0 3 s 19 20 Twin lakes B-8 48 Harry S.Truman FB wooamaKAW 1 ,"•i ; ° a e ara't+t 9 21 Valhalla ` e "+" 1•"^ 22 tiVNdwood F-S F-6 Future School Sltoe— '1;,i' m 2 F • (' ,�' n4�� ,,. 23 YYoodmant F-3 surplus Was 81 Educational Service Center F-6 d wt ' 88 Malnlonanco-0poraUane-TranapoRaUon E-8 — Code— ■ ° err+ •a s10P�u Me� r a 2 Parks— .,` ar Wti FEDERAL WAY. WASHINGTON and VICINITY , 4 y ^' ° • , ,"" aeC Ir drams wN°na n I e. ,•w a i ,' r d '�ii•��f a :�..- 6 3 ° .y,.•' ° 1 ' i"!"'r , 6.. a+. yS J"':' :�.Ri4 �� a . n r Lw •� n1. �•p,°° ,tr.. !i J •t wrmw ,,,� i• •�� , rr x 6 , t �e 1 1 t e N p,� e � � wrrrww4rra " •'i � c nx � �• � ', 8 AnaUArgM [ 8' E 71 .I ar j 1 a nwx• I � q� •ay a i i 3 .. ,! S .4as wW.+.nrrr..wws4r.Rb,rrm" 0° rmn ` arw ° ! ex "f a,rw'�x""iy°a'"w"iew.r.wwiNartl.w• . q • "aa°I'oim.�nun ax Y ys $ i ! , � w 0 a,w " a "• 0 s 0� r.ae 46 9 m°wmalma 1 " w a w " w ,i + wrryJaw•aMa.....J w o 76 30 i� � a n d�f PM "7 0 x•ai,. , 4mlwt w.uwww 6 ," m w 1 SS 6 ii .dAMC • • ° M4 Federal Way Public Schools '° 6 '° (.����� r��� J r r J EVGy JWLL[nt1 a 1\GalCr MLLTON • • Irw4na0rnim Rlnp n n " 3641h I 9452000 IJnreN Pk,p !1 E P G 0°"H MIDDLE SCHOOL BOUNDARIES • • E F Ylt.sAw.- KwrrwG H Federal Way Public Schools .................. PEE MzVo °ntlM __-.-_-- . ------ Every Student,a header ,• „ a° 3 + • uwm ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS MIDDLE SCHOOLS Code— . Code— . ~" L ■ {i s n ll A t 1 Adelaide C-6 30 Illahoo E-9 i ?• n + r I 2 Ijdgadoon B-0 31 Kilo ' 0.6 2 " •'" a •. It `+ 12 3 Camelot G-6 32 Lakota 0•6 " 4 Enterprise D•9 33 Sacajawea E•6 6 Grson Gables A-7 34 Saghalle C-0 6 Lake DolloN G•6 36 Totem G-3 r I 7 Lake Grove D-6 30 Federal Way Public Academy E-6 eellw.l:?:'•,, + r ^ r 6 Lake►and E-6 9 Mark;%ln F4 x a aEo sI 10 Meredith Hill H•6 SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS 11 M!"C Lake E-e ° 12 Nautilus E-6 3 I a • 3 ii i 3 Code— 13 Olympic View C-7 14 Panther Lake E-0 q0 Decatur C 6 16 Rainier View F-10 3 i s 41 Fed % 18 8harw 6 ood Forest D-0 Federal Way E• • 1 42 Thomas Jefferson G+4 17 Silver Lake D•7 46 Todd Boamer 10 star Lake 0 3 E 849 Hrest arry S.Truman F-6 i e '[ " 20 Tdn KACH yLake S4 wo l ssrp`s4 u `` ° ;{•± 21 Valhalla G-4 9 22 Wlidwood F-6 Future School Sites— 23 Woodmonl F-3 Surplus sites N ° , At 01 Educational Service Comer F-6 — " i. e 66 Malntenanco-0peraUone•TransportaUon E-8 — Code— ■ r "" Parke— D p�aA°� '• + a "i °a,x 2, ^ • ^e o y g ° a .g a»: •=a M„ •«,«- �� ;� ..'-:--• ~� Ewa s C FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON and VICINITY YE �II'' yesNp •9�E i i' 7 � •E /�,' •� J� 1 = , °� �� V jet r I %' a ]] F� w to a •, w r a V • ..«"' ...a'• eIY — I r?r°t u"[^�, i 31 a • �° •J E E. een^� N ! « .•i a d i i a a. C •e:yrjf a w1 . + 6 i � i S+' ` ! ^• • - a a �'ZixriYi +° •w`r.A• r ! � i�t` 'ph iv ,"'.°,', 'aE x '. i.~n c W 'ii d�+. m, f ;,�01 r�• I. r1 G. 61 ` ° - _ s:4. rtET I^s.� ," x Y.•� e m Y a � .«. � J 7 !, ° 6 �, ° , � = i 3° e p 0 1- -,! d f:• u ,-•,xx L C ,m m+xx+� 1� @` ,� ] .•E i�dE a = e� yt x. 1 ° I l '•,a1", q n w • ,FF LL ° +A„i a ,'• /• N 34E $ p..w o ee,n u' + '''�1''•«.• wrrrAxArusan.,�"�i; ,a r'ic ,e a W E r '" n 6° an u^Ow• ' ; 36: or +1ifL��'a✓Yn .,41 "a ee 4.4 ONE o°,p/a,..lrroww„were•garmYrY p a s 1, Y e " i Y ■a ,� „A A "� AN.w«M.wY4.w.emawu..wwr«r, ° '••^ ^ Yq �< S BSI Yrrm,aMMn.1.MY..+bwrtN..r, e e a " e • ,aw ZP «.x,aww w I.'"'.wmz10'leuian "' w «n 46 [}•� Y a a aw,9 w,,,p{m.NA,r,•.w a .r a 78 30 a j ��. j 4 w„ s ci. >n e 4.y 3 p r A1rROn,aGLL HIYREf 'tr 4" E 72 '4pg u, p '"' ,�lr "�' ,!0 R:•vai � 3 It PACIFIC Federal Way Public Schools I w•Evety Student,a Reader •I MRreN e " n • OwbY,Srnlea I.-- co n 4° Sea lb ' 9454000 Plrro ou �""'•"' rn. rw II E F G oxYm a A I H j HIGH SCHOOL BOUNDARIES • • E F xW,w■aw w■a.w G H Federal Way Public Schools --" -•--" PB4 "" '-" "' r a"--"-__-_-_- .a■.a t • Every Sladent,a Raeder ";• " • `+ I wue r ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS MIDDLE SCHOOLS Code— . Code— 1 Adelaide GB 30 Mahan E•e r i' °t: a t+ E 2 pdgadoon &8 31 Kilo 0 e ( ° 3 Camelot 0-6 32 Lakota D•8 2 ? , ;• 2 4 Enterprise D-0 33 Saeajawea E-6 u..• �;t.,+ +c + 6 Green Ga�es A-7 34 Soghallo C-8 6 Lake Donor G 8 36 Totem G-3 7 Leko Grovel D 8 38 Federal Way Public Academy E-9 8 Lakeland E•9 w l a Wd4 t n'f 1 9 Mark Twain F-4 ■ +" + .." +: i ti.l, " s xsa st 1 10 Meredith HUI H•6 SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS .. i w�. 11 Mirror Lake E-6 12 Nautilus E•6 3 + v { 3 3 Coda— 13 01Y++IPIo View C-7 � • +. " '_ i 14 Panther Lake E•a •" ' + ; U40 Decatur C- 16 RalnlerVlew F•10 41 Federal Way E•6 J' 18 SherwoodForest D-0 17 8Uvet Lake p"7 42 Thomas JoHoreon G4 e L 46 Todd Boamer E-9 ", 8 18 81ar lake 0'3 49 Harry S.Truman F-6 s ° to 19 Bunnycreet G-2 w000xo e s si u 28 Twin Lakes B$ NAM 9 Y • ° 21 Vathetta G-4 22 WlkWood F-6 Future School Sites— °Q 1' S Q •� 23 Woodmont F•3 Surplus Silos — 4 ,.,♦ 81 Educational Service Center F-8 — ,a°• '$ ,x'" + - ° •+ 86 MaMtenance-Opero0on°-TransportaUon E•6 — Coda— •�f r � „rr 2 i i' ' � KINO ��- Parke— r0+get, D a. F FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON and VIC/N/T el + O'Na .u.x4 6 6'c'..•, iw n°- en + . + a° All I ■d • 0' t i 6• e 6 •e 41 ~i i?rn uai^ q ��, g 31• c s • la e`." i x. ■,�iiTiH ..°�.... ■ g9,t4• :n T: ," Ji r 7 ` •: s. ,a ° w , s,w �� Q •S �• 01.' .�� 1• eA■orA 32 ■ G_,,1 •w e r •, .� 6. rotMr i •••»"� 20 + 4e i' aw 3 -el+. + r sae at ' pa• _ " I a 7 yea■ ■ e ° e e� + + ' I wyt ws +.i ! 6e 7•. q � � a as e • e� t` .• " v+ , °�a and � •� .n. • � j N• ... Noa, e'• ° �G "♦" Y ,•i pd N+AnnW"TfM ,I 8 ® 8 -n nn °Ar 4 14 •w�f%A' 71 r E m a a S ►1 1 r ne w' 1S�r�� ..•.. ni • 0 ' ea e t a �i' " • I nw,x w■aa■ r, L f $•' ,e ♦ ii•i!3 S 1 OWe/„r.xl►NrwWeeNr■exear,0altlb ■7° 1 •„� S s° BI ?� axes+■ °1 ° �C ' a a Pwx•,a.a..fmxw!W nm....awwe°..a aare.ref••♦•�.as•.el.•,tl••� e c i + ° e � .•aw+r rgI Aw1r■wrhxaw "a 6 s a y na� i s w i a,a a s•"+ "° t emla■°"mA1°tlitaa 'e4 t ,9 4 wa a , ♦xa 9 ICY stOlaW ° eN W 48 ° 7 4 .• m a i x, aI ,r.eNaa.rw•..—.d ra 76 30 '+t ♦ y 7 �f t a S j • °•a i 1 a ppaex � A •t. •• g ri n ii. ° ■ru I ° x x • , �'re,26ien ° t 4r J :t . w i � °iq' � i i "x,i0 w , A,MOL t°Att we♦xtF■ i 6 en• 2 � N � m Ne i f � j x.a'� i fe i as • . • D � N.i a ■a a Iq p i i e i �a ° " "� 3 Jlria • .....y..f "" 0 ar A I i r W ♦' 0 .,ACNeC a" r Federal Way Public Schools I0 °' " ' I 2,10 Every Stetdent,a Reeder • • Bud a strvlm KMp °i t 945,1000 MILYON Pneta °° nN AWx•■JW E F G O1 °b°° N FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2009 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 3 -SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION Building Capacities - The Education Program Portable Locations Student Forecast—2009 through 2015 Capacity Summaries King County Impact Fees - Single and Multi Family Units 15 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2009 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Building Capacities This Capital Facilities Plan establishes the District's "standard of service" in order to ascertain the District's current and future capacity. The Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, but these guidelines do not take into consideration the education program needs. In general, the District's current target class size provides that the average class size for a standard classroom for grades K through 2 should be 20 students. In grades 3-5 the target is 25 students. For grades six to 12 the target class size is 26 students. Classrooms for students with Individualized Education Program (Special Education) needs are calculated at 12 seats per classroom. Using the OSPI square footage calculation as a base line, the District has calculated a program capacity for all schools. The following list clarifies the adjustments to the OSPI calculation. Music Rooms: Each elementary school requires a standard classroom for music instruction. All Day Kindergarten: Every elementary school operates at least one all day Kindergarten program. These all day Kindergarten program require additional capacity because the standard classroom is available for one all day session rather than two half day sessions. The District will operate 44 sections of all day Kindergarten in 2008/09 Special Education Resource Rooms: Each elementary and middle school requires the use of a standard classroom(s) for special education students requiring instruction to address specific disabilities English as a Second Language Programs: Each elementary, middle school and high school requires the use of a standard classroom for students learning English as a second language. Middle School Computer Labs: Each middle school has computer labs. High School Career Development and Learning Center(Resource) Room: Each high school provides special education resource room and career development classrooms for students requiring instruction to address specific disabilities. 16 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2009 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITIES , ELEMENTARY BUILDING MIDDLE SCHOOL BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY PROGRAM CAPACITY School Name Headcount School Name Headcount FTE Adelaide 349 Illahee 840 848 Bri adoon 312 Kilo 858 867 Camelot 234 Lakota 764 772 Enterprise 443 Sacajawea 660 667 Green Gables 474 Saghalie 774 782 Lake Dolloff 395 Se uo ah 601 607 Lake Grove 324 Totem 701 708 Lakeland 377 Federal Way Public Academy 200 202 Mark Twain 321 2008 TOTAL 5,398 5,453 Meredith Hill 475 Mirror Lake 331 Nautilus 353 fiddle School Average 743 750 Olympic View 333 Panther Lake 422 SENIOR HIGH BUILDING Rainier View 429 PROGRAM CAPACITY Sherwood Forest 408 Silver Lake 421 School Name Headcount FTE Star Lake 367 Decatur 1316 1,393 Sunn crest 354 Federal Way 1432 1,515 Twin Lakes 308 Thomas Jefferson 1386 1,467 Valhalla 352 Todd Beamer 1121 1,186 Wildwood 333 Truman High School 173 183 Woodmont 347 Federal Way Public Academy 133 141 2008 TOTAL 5,561 5,885 2008 TOTAL 8,462 *Senior High Average 1,314 1,390 ementary verage 3 8 Notes: *Federal Way Public Academy capacity is not used in calculated average. *TAF Academy capaity is not used in calculated average *Truman High School capacity is not used in calculated average. 17 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2009 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Portable Locations The Washington State Constitution requires the State to provide each student a basic education. It is not an efficient use of District resources to build a school with a capacity for 500 students due to lack of space for 25 students when enrollment fluctuates throughout the year and from year to year. Portables are used as temporary facilities or interim measures to house students when increasing population impacts a school attendance area. Portables may also be required to house students when new or changing programs require additional capacity. They also provide temporary housing for students until permanent facilities can be financed and constructed. . When permanent facilities become available, the portable(s) is either used for other purposes such as storage or child care programs, or moved to another school for an interim classroom. Some portables may not be fit to move due to age or physical Icondition. In these cases, the District may choose to buy new portables and surplus these unfit portables. It is the practice and philosophy of Federal Way Public Schools that portables are not acceptable as permanent facilities. The followingpage provides a list of the location of the portable facilities used for pg p temporary educational facilities by Federal Way Public Schools. 18 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2009 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PORTABLE LOCATIONS PORTABLESLOCATED PORTABLES LOCATED AT ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS AT SENIOR HIGHS NON NON INSTRUCT ZONAL INSTRUCTIONAL INSTRUCTIONAL INSTRUCTIONAL Adelaide 2 1 Decatur 9 Bri adoon 1 Federal Way 2 1 Camelot 1 Thomas Jefferson 7 Enterprise 2 1 Todd Beamer 7 1 Green Gables 1 Lake Dolloff 1 1 TOTAL 25 2 Lake Grove 2 Lakeland 2 Mark Twain 3 Meredith Hill 3 Mirror Lake 3 1 PORTABLES LOCATED Nautilus 1 AT SUPPORT FACILITIES Olympic View 2 Panther Lake 3 MOT 1 Rainier View 2 1 TDC 5771 Sherwood Forest 4 TOTAL 6 Silver Lake 2 2 Star Lake 2 2 Sunn crest 1 1 HEAD START PORTABLES AT DISTRICT SITES Twin Lakes 2 1 Valhalla 1 1 Sherwood Forest 1 Wildwood 4 Woodmont 3 Total 1 TOTAL 47 13 PORTABLES LOCATED AT MIDDLE SCHOOLS NON INSTRUCTIONAL INSTRUCTIONAL Illahee 3 Kilo 6 1 Lakota 3 Sacajawea 4 Saghalie 4 Totem 5 Merit 2 TAF Academy 10 1 34 5 19 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2009 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Student Forecast Student enrollment projections are a basic component of budget development. Enrollment projections influence many of the financial estimates that go into budget preparation. The majority of staffing requirements are derived directly from the forecasted number of students. Allocations for instructional supplies and materials are also made on the basis of projected enrollment. Other expenditures and certain revenue projections are directly related to enrollment projections. Enrollment projections are completed annually in the Business Services Department. Projections must be detailed at various levels, district total, school-building totals, grade level and program level to include vocational and special education students. The basis of projections has been cohort survival analysis. Cohort survival is the analysis of a group that has a common statistical value (grade level) as it progresses through time. In a stable population the cohort would be 1.00 for all grades. This analysis uses historical information to develop averages and project the averages forward. This method does not trace individual students; it is concerned with aggregate numbers in each grade level. The district has used this method with varying years of history and weighted factors to study several projections. Because transfers in and out of the school system are common, student migration is factored into the analysis as it increases or decreases survival rates. Entry grades (kindergarten) are a unique problem in cohort analysis. The district collects information on birth rates within the district's census tracts, and treats these statistics as a cohort for kindergarten enrollment in the appropriate years. The Federal Way School District is using various statistical methods for projecting student enrollments. The resultant forecasted enrollments are evaluated below. The first method is a statistical cohort analysis that produces ten distinct forecasts. These are forecast of enrollment for one year. The projections vary depending on the number of years of historical information and how they are weighted. A second method is a projection using an enrollment projection software package that allows the user to project independently at school or grade level and to aggregate these projections for the district level. The Enrollment MasterTM software provides statistical methods including trend line, standard grade progression(cohort) and combinations of these methods. This software produces a five-year projection of school enrollment. In December 2006, the District contracted a demographer to develop projections for the Federal Way School District. The report was complete in January 2007. The model used to forecast next year's enrollment uses cohort survival rates to measure grade to grade growth, assumes market share losses to private schools (consistent with county-wide average), assumes growth from new housing or losses due to net losses from migration. This forecast was provided as a range of three projections. The long-range forecast provided with this report used a model with cohort survival rates and growth rates based on projected changes in the 5-19 age group for King County. Most of the methods used for long range enrollment reporting assume that enrollment is a constant percent of 20 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2009 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN something else (e.g. population) or that enrollment will mirror some projected trend for the school-age population over time. The report included 5 different calculations to provide a range of possible projections for the District to the year 2015. This model produces a projection that is between 23,000 and 24,000 when applied to the low, medium and high range modes. This provides a reasonable range for long-range planning and is consistent with estimates from various models. Long-range projections that establish the need for facilities are a modification of the cohort survival method. The cohort method of analysis becomes less reliable the farther out the projections are made. The Federal Way School District long-range projections are studied annually. The study includes information from the jurisdictional demographers as they project future housing and population in the region. The long-range projections used by Federal Way Public Schools reflect a similar age trend in student populations as the projections published by the Office of Financial Management for the State of Washington. Near term projections assume some growth from new housing, which is offset by current local economic conditions. The District tracks new development from five permitting jurisdictions. Long range planning assumes a student yield from proposed new housing consistent with historical growth patterns. Growth Management requires jurisdictions to plan for a minimum of twenty ears. The g q J p YY Federal Way School District is a partner in this planning with the various jurisdictions comprising the school district geography. These projections create a vision of the school district community in the future. 21 ' FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2009 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Full Time Equivalent Enrollment History and Projections Simplified FTE(K Headcount=.5 FTE;Middle School FTE=.99 Headcount;Senior High FTE=.945Headcount) ' Total K-12 Percent Calendar Yr School Year Elementary Middle School Senior High FTE Change 2003 2002-03 11,202 5,454 4,437 21,093 2004 * 2003-04 9,127 5,524 6,408 21,059 -0.2% 2005 2004-05 9,164 5,473 6,515 21,152 0.4% 2006 2005-06 9,105 5,309 6,770 21,184 0.2% 2007 2006-07 9,022 5,261 6,754 21,037 -0.7% 2008 2007-08 8,912 5,167 6,637 20,716 -1.5% 2009 B2008-09 8,875 5,165 6,707 20,746 0.1% 2010 P2009-10 8,903 5,194 6,685 20,782 0.2% 2011 P2010-11 8,952 5,120 6,797 20,869 0.4% 2012 P2011-12 9,113 5,085 6,785 20,983 0.5% 2013 P2012-13 9,208 5,037 6,760 21,005 0.1% 2014 P2013-14 9,312 51011 6,765 21,088 0.4% 2015 P2014-15 9,399 5,055 6,720 21,174 0.4% *New Configuration Elementary K-5 Middle School 6-8 High School 9-12 Enrollment History and Six Year Forecast zz,000 1 o°i° 21,000 0.5% i 20,000 7 0.0% o v 19,000 R _ -0 5% � a 18,000 o O -1.0% 17,000 -1.5% 16,000 15,000 -2.0% c� c3 o� c1 c? c� � 00 oO o oO o0 oO `'o `'o `'o `'o VO. o `'o r? -� o o > > > > > Our biS Orn b� bcP o10 School Year CO FTE 0 Percent of Change ' 22 1 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2009 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 1 Capacity Summaries 1 All Grades, Elementary, Middle School, and Senior High Schools The Capacity Summaries combine Building Capacity information and the Student 1 Forecast information. The result demonstrates the requirements for new or remodeled facilities and why there is a need for the District to use temporary facilities or interim measures. The information is organized in spreadsheet format, with a page summarizing the entire District, and then evaluating capacity vs. number of students at elementary, middle 1 school, and senior high levels individually. The notes at the bottom of each spreadsheet provide information about what facilities are 1 in place each year. 1 1 i 1 1 i i 1 1 1 1 23 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2009 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN , CAPACITY SUMMARY-ALL GRADES Budget -- Projected-- ' Calendar Year 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2014 CAPACITY School Year 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 BUILDING PROGRAM HEADCOUNT CAPACITY 19,421 19,421 19,521 19,521 19,621 19,621 19,621 "e°)�$l(t i 9,$t0 ; 1,000 13 900 `20;00(1' ` 4(1(10 24,000 FTE CAPACITY . ° Add or subtract changes to capacity ' Increase Capacity,Lakeland,Panther Lake Sunnycrest and Valhalla 100 100 Adjusted Program Headcount Capacity 19,421 19,521 19,521 19,621 1 19,621 19,621 19,621 Adjusted Program FTA Capacity, `a4''� 1 `8C►0 a19,900 19,900 ,T2�,fi1(10 ' ,000 20,000 20,0UU ENROLLMENT Basic FTE Enrollment 20,746 20,782 20,869 20,983 21,005 21,088 21,174 Internet Academy Enrollment(AAFTE) 315 315 315 315 315 315 315 Basic FTE Fnrollmnent-without it ie Academy' , "2 1 2t1,457 , „20,554 20,668 20,690, 0,t3 20;859 SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) PROGRAM`F'TE CAPACITY 'l f s r'(6311) (56i) (654) 1i68) ' (690) �(773) (859) RELOCATABLE CAPACITY i Current Portable Capacity 2,400 2,725 2,725 2,725 2,725 2,725 2,725 Deduct Portable Capacity (75) Add New Portable Capacity 400 Adjusted Portable Capacity {` art,: " _ ,.'2 725 L. 2,725 = --=2,72 -- 2,725 1 2,725 :2,725 2,725 , SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE CAPACITY ' S - "' 0094 2,158 2,Q71`Y} "E2,057 2,035 1,952 1,8663 24 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2009 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARY-ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS Budget -- Projected-- Calendar Year 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2014 CAPACITY School Year 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 BUILDING PROGRAM HEAD COUNT CAPACITY 8,462 8,462 8,562 8,562 8,662 8,662 8,662 PTE CAPACITY, 8,462 8,462 8,562 di °h- 662 8,662 8,662 ' 1. Increase Capacity,Lakeland,Panther Lake Sunn crest and Valhalla 100 100 Adjusted Program Headcount Capacity 1 8,462 1 8,562 8,562 8,662 8,662 8,662 8,662 Adjusted Program FTE Capacity 8,462 8,562 8,562-� „k i - 8,662 8,662 ENROLLMENT ' Basic FTE Enrollment 8,875 8,903 8,952 9,113 9,208 9,312 9,399 2. Internet Academy(AAFTE) 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 Basic FTE Enrollment without Internet Academy 8,839 8,867 8,916 _ � '` 2 9,276 9,363 SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) PROGRAM CAPACITY (377) (305) (354) (614) (701) RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 3. Current Portable Capacity 1,175 1,175 1,175 1,175 1,175 1,175 1,175 ' Remove out of service portables from Wildwood and Camelot (50) Add portable capacity to Camelot 25 Add portable capacity to Wildwood from Thomas Jeffersl 25 Adjusted Portable Capacity a .1,175 1,175 1,175 ; F�1 , ,75 1,175 1,175 SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE CAPACITY _798 970 821 ' , � 5 561 474 NOTES: ' 1. Increase Capacity at Lakeland,Panther Lake,Sunnycrest and Valhalla 2. Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities. 3. Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which ' can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available.This is a calculated number only. The actual number of portables that will be used will be based on actual student population needs. The District may begin to pull portables from the instructional inventory. Age and condition of the portables will determine feasibility for continued instructional use. 25 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2009 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN ' CAPACITY SUMMARY-MIDDLE SCHOOLS , Budget -- Projected-- Calendar Year 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2014 CAPACITY School Year 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 BUILDING PROGRAM HEADCOUNT CAPACITY 5,398 5,398 5,398 5,398 5,398 5,398 5,398 Tl3 CAPACT Y ,3 453 5 453 ;'5,453 .,5 45 5,453 5,453 5,453 JI Adjusted Program Headcount Capacity 5,398 5,398 1 5,398 1 5,398 1 5,398 5,398 5,398 Adjusted Pro afro E Capacity = , ,; `.' Sf 3 , ,453 5,453 $;453 �5,453 ;4 3 5,453 ENROLLMENT Basic FTE Enrollment 5,165 5,194 5,120 5,085 5,037 5,011 5,055 ' 1. Internet Academy (AAFTE) 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 task FTE Enrolln�eiit,withc�i> site �Academy 4, ;"'5,091 5,120" ° ,U4 ,Oft 4,963 4,937 4,981 SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) ' PROGRAM CAPAG1717V:' 4 -307 278 ' 352 1 387 1 -4351,' - 461 417 RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 2.. Current Portable Capacity 600 650 650 650 650 650 650 Add/Subtract portable capacity , Add new portable capacity TAF Academy 50 Adjusted Pcirt ble Capacity ;�'; ° 450 650: '650650 650 = 650 6S0 SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE CAPACIT , . _ _ < , ;957 928 1,1102 1,037= {°1,0$S :1,111 1,067 ' NOTES: 1. Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities. 2. Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available.This is a calculated number only. The actual number of portables that will be used will be based on actual student population needs. ' The District may begin to pull portables from the instructional inventory. Age and condition of the portables will determine feasibility for continued instructional use. 26 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2009 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARY-SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS 1 Budget -- Projected-- Calendar Year 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2014 CAPACITY School Year 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 BUILDING PROGRAM HEADCOUNT CAPACITY 5,561 5,561 5,561 5,561 5,561 5,561 5,561 FTE CAPACITY 5,885 5,8$5 5,885t!: "0$5' 5,885 5,885 5,885 ' Add or subtract changes in capacity Adjusted Program Headcount Capacity 5,561 5,561 1 5,561 5,561 5,561 5,561 5,561 Adjusted Program.FTE Capacity 5,885 5,885 5,885�y , �5 5,885 5,885 1 5,885 ' ENROLLMENT Basic FTE Enrollment 6,707 1 6,685 1 6,797 6,785 6,760 6,765 6,720 1. Internet Academy(AAFTE) 205 205 205 205 205 205 205 Basic Ed without,iuternet Academy 6,502 6,480 6,591,��„ 90, ° 6,555 1 6,560 6;515 SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) PROGRAM CAPACITY 1 (941) 1 (919) 1 (11030 -,"NO19) 1 (994) (999) (954) RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 2. Current Portable Capacity 625 900 900 900 900 900 900 Subtract portable capacity-move to Wildwood (25) Add portable capacity at TJ 100 Add portable capacity at TAF Academy 200 Adjusted Portable Capacity 900 goo. t 9 := _ n 900 900 # SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE 3. CAPACITY (41) (19) 13>k. '�. <;a` (94) (99) (54) NOTES: 1. Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities. ' 2. Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available.This is a calculated number only. The actual number of portables that will be used will be based on actual student population needs. The District may begin to pull portables from the instructional inventory. Age and condition of the portables will determine feasibility for continued instructional use. 3. Capacity for unhoused students will be accommodated with traveling teachers and no planning time in some classrooms. Puget Sound Early College will house approximately 60 of the unhoused students. 27 ' FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2009 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN King County, the City of Federal Way, and the City of Kent Impact Fee Calculations ' Single and Multi-Family Residences Each jurisdiction that imposes school impact fees requires that developers pay these fees to help cover a share of the impact of new housing developments on school facilities. To determine an equitable fee throughout unincorporated King County, a formula was established. This formula can be found in King County Code 2 1 A and was substantially adopted by the City of Federal Way and Kent. The formula requires the District to establish a "Student Generation Factor" which estimates how many students will be added to a school district by each new single or multi-family unit and to gather some standard construction costs, which are unique to that district. - STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR ANALYSIS Federal Way Public Schools student generation factor was determined separately for single-family units and multi-family units. The factors used in the 2007 Capital Facilities Plan were derived using actual generation factors from single-family units that were constructed in the last five (5) years. - IMPACT FEE CALCULATION Following the calculations for the student generation factor is a copy of the Impact Fee Calculation for single family and multi-family units based on King County Code 21 A and the Growth Management Act. ' ➢ Temporary Facility Cost is the average cost of a portable purchased within the last 12 months. ' Plan Year 2009 Plan Year 2008 Single Family Units $4,017 $3,883 Multi-Family Units 1 $1,733 $ 1,647 28 C O r` CO M d 0 CO d N c � 00 r- Co l0 c, 0 0 O r- N O m M O � fQ to 0) 0 00 m co 0 'O V O CM N N r` O 0 N M Lf)00 �a +-' 'O V O It N , ~ U) lL O c) c; CDO O 0 O 0 0 H y lL O c; O t I 01 yr co c O (n O M O M ; c " Co 00 C4 = lc O �_ N CO M O O N = d 0 Co O O a N It N N N M M N O M O O � N w CD o 0 0 00 O 666 G a L C7 0 O U) N O O ' V C Co 00 O) O d V C CO) Cl) at O Cn O Co d to O C4 N — M N O r- r` N Gf 7 Co . . 17 O N N N - O . T- a, �7 V Cl) O co N 1L oo 00000000 0 : NLLOo 0 a C �' MOCOCOMOMOdCO Y'! C OCD N QI c d w M O 00 Cq O N r` 00 co c d r 'ITLn N O V V M M CO d d d Ln r` N N d y V M N (/] E ' M Cl) d Cl) N It CO LO N N M E �3� d ALL 0000000000 ci dy LL 00 O ~ W W 0 cp to 0 cm Lo c = c w E O CA N CCV M N N CD CA C 0 ' M t 7 c r E E y Z dN Z dU) N (7" O [ w --i 6 O O L. 0 O QJ1U O 0 QO 0 C.1 C CO w � G c O N Od Cl) M u► E 7 CA M OO a O W NM 3 y z Z � � C7 O +0+ (V O u "a a ° r ° M w +. c " +. c F7 � a N c 0 O W Cn M f— M Cn O N d ca d o 0) f� d y E E � M Nd � � dO �- �- N G� � MN CO O .. 7 N N fir 7 2 N U U Z W Z W 0 4) E c E cm -O LL = O O O O O O O O O O O d LL - N � N E °' E Z G Z C W 0Ey o •EH , Q tm cm w LL CD .- 00 LO 0) c, Go 0 Co 0o U. c E of d 0) d CO N USt• N d N O O 0 0 O Z C_ C Z C_ ca 0 'H Z O � O Z Q Z c A W > - = dLC oO a c dc dCL ca O o Oo ocO ;o -> o ` Uc m w ; Cd pmm i Cc 'a m a)i > c cd9 a. oo > t c r- c m a ZUU � OODZ200 Cl) 00 0o r. r�co co ,n ui v o Il OOOOOOOON9 -ica FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2009 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN IMPACT FEE School Site Acquisition Cost: Student Student Facility Cost/ Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Acreage Acre Capacity SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary 0.3285 0.1222 $0 $0 Middle School 0.1631 0.00621 $0 $0 Sr High 0.2446 0.0942 $0 $0 TOTAL $0 $0 School Construction Cost: Student Student %Perm Fac./ Facility Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Total Sq Ft Cost Capacity SFR MFR SFR MFR ' Elementary 96.81% $9,100,000 200 0.3285 0.1222 $14,470 $5,383 Middle School 0.1631 0.0621 $0 $0 Sr High 0.2446 0.0942 $0 $0 TOTAL $14 470 $5,383 Temporary Facility Cost: Student Student %Temp Fac. Facility Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Total S Ft Cost Size SFR MFR SFR MFR ' Elementary ,3„19%_....._..._. „„ 0.3285 0.1222 $0 $0 Middle School 3.19% 0.1631 0.0621 $0 $0 Sr High 3.19% $168,307 25 0.2446 0.0942 $53 $20 TOTAL $53 $20 State Matching Credit Calculation: Student Student Area Cost Sq Ft. State Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Allowance/Sq Ft Student Match SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary 1 $168.79 90 61.84% 0.3285 0.1222 $3,086 $1,148 Middle School $168.79 0.1631 0.0621 $0 $0 .__......_. _..... .__....._ _ __�...._.._ __.. _... New Sr High $168.79 1 0.2446 0.0942 $0 $0 Total $3,086 $1,148 Tax Payment Credit Calculation SFR MFR Average Assessed Value (March 2008) $297,242 $68,998 Capital Bond Interest Rate(March 2008) 5.11% 5.1 1% Net Present Value of Average Dwelling $2,283,012 $529,950 Years Amortized 10 10 Property Tax Levy Rate $1.49 — $1.49 Present Value of Revenue Stream $3,402 $790 Single Family Multi-Family Residences Residences Mitigation Fee Summary Site Acquisition Cost $ - $ - Permanent Facility Cost $ 14,470 $ 5,383 Temporary Facility Cost $ 53 $ 20 State Match Credit $ (3,086) $ (1,148) Tax Payment Credit $ (3,402) $ (790) Sub-Total $ 8,035 $ 3,465 50%Local Share $ 4,017 $ 1,733 Im act Fee $ 4,017 $ 1,733 30 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2009 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 4 SUMMARY OF CHANGES FROM THE 2008 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN The 2009 Capital Facilities Plan is an updated document, based on the 2008 Capital Facilities Plan. The changes between the 2008 Plan and the 2009 Plan are listed below. SECTION I -THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SIX-YEAR FINANCE PLAN The Six Year Finance Plan has been rolled forward to reflect 2009/2015 ' SECTION III - SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION CAPACITY Elementary school capacity reflects program changes for the 2008/09 school year. Elementary capacity includes space for All Day Kindergarten programs at every elementary school. Changes to the Building Program Capacities calculation are found on page 17. tPORTABLES The list of portables reflects the movement of portables between facilities or new portables purchased. Portable Locations can be found on page 19. STUDENT FORECAST The Student Forecast now covers 2009 through 2015 Enrollment history and projections are found on page 22. CAPACITY SUMMARY The changes in the Capacity Summary are a reflection of the changes in the capacities and student forecast. New schools and increased capacity at current buildings are shown as increases to capacity. Capacity Summaries are found on pages 24-27. IMPACT FEE CALCULATION -KING COUNTY CODE 21A The Impact Fee Calculations have changed due to changes in several factors. The adjustment made in the Impact Fee Calculation, causing a change in the Impact Fee between the 2008 Capital Facilities Plan and the 2009 Capital Facilities Plan can be found on page 31. 31 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2009 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN IMPACT FEE CALCULATION CHANGES FROM 2008 TO 2009 STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS ' Student Generation factors are based on rates for new developments constructed over a period of not more than five years prior to the date of the fee calculation. The changes in student Generation factors between the 2008 Capital Facilities Plan and the 2009Capital , Facilities Plan are due to developments that were deleted or added based upon the age of the developments and the year placed in the survey. The Student Generation worksheet is found on page 29. SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION COSTS The anticipated cost for replacing Lakeland, Panther Lake, Sunnycrest and Valhalla is $70,000,000. The replacement will add 50 new seats to the school capacity at each building. The total capacity at these four elementary schools is currently 1505. Adding 200 additional seats will increase the capacity by 13%. Total Cost .13 X $70,000,000= $9,100,000 The District will use the above formula created as a base from the 2008 Capital Facilities Plan for the 2009 Capital Facilities Plan. The capacity of the four elementary schools may vary from year to year as programs are added or changed and construction cost may increase over time. For instance for each new all day Kindergarten program, the building capacity will effectively be reduced by 20 headcount and the Board authorized an increase in construction cost of $lm for Valhalla. These changes would increase the construction cost. The District is using the base formula established in the 2008 plan in the Impact Fee calculation. 32 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2009 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN IMPACT FEE CALCULATION CHANGES FROM 2008 TO 2009 IMPACT FEE Item From/To Comment Percent of Permanent Facilities 96.21% to 96.81% Report#3 OSPI Percent Temporary Facilities 3.79% to 3.19% Updated portable inventory Average Cost of Portable $128,982 to $168,307 Updated average of portables Classroom purchased and placed in 2007 Area Cost Allowance $162.43 to $168.79 Change effective Julyl, 2008 State Match 61.90%to 61.84% Change effective July 2007 Average Assessed Value SFR— Per Puget Sound Educational $262848 to $297,242 Service District (ESD 121) MFR— $63,234 to $68,998 Capital Bond Interest Rate 4.08% to 5.11% Market Rate Property Tax Levy Rate $1.27 to $1.49 King County Treasury Division Single Family Student Yield Updated Housing Inventory Elementary .3462 to .3285 Middle School .2186 to .1631 High School .2418 to .2446 Multi-Family Student Yield Updated Housing Inventory Elementary .1129 to .1222 1 Middle School .0575 to .0621 High School .0842 to .0942 33 DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Issued with a 14 Day comment and appeals period Description of Proposal: This threshold determination analyzes the environmental impacts associated with the following actions, which are so closely related to each other that they are in effect a single action: I. The adoption of the Federal Way Public Schools' 2009 Six Year Capital Facilities Plan by the Federal Way Public Schools for the purposes of planning for the facilities needs of the District. 2. The amendment of the King County Comprehensive Plan by King County to include the Federal Way Public Schools' 2009 Capital Facilities Plan as part of the Capital Facilities Plan Element of the King County Comprehensive Plan. 3. The amendment of the Comprehensive Plans of the City of Federal Way, City of Kent and the City of Auburn to include the Federal Way Public Schools' 2009 Capital Facilities Plan as part of the Capital Facilities Plan Element of the City of Federal Way's, City of Kent's and the City of Auburn's Comprehensive Plan. This proposal may also involve the amendment of the Comprehensive Plans of the City of Des Moines to incorporate the Federal Way Public Schools' 2009 Capital Facilities Plan into the Capital Facilities Element of the City of Des Moines' Comprehensive Plan. Proponent: Federal Way Public Schools Location of the Proposal: The Federal Way Public Schools District includes an area of approximately 35 square miles. Areas of the cities of Federal Way, Kent, Des Moines and Auburn fall within the District's boundaries, as do parts of unincorporated King County. Lead Agency: Federal Way Public Schools is the lead agency pursuant to WAC 197-11-926. The lead agency for this proposal has determined that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse environmental impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement(EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after a review of the completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public upon request. This Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date of issue. Comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m., April 30, 2008. The responsible official will reconsider the DNS based on timely comments and may retain, modify, or, if significant adverse impacts are likely, withdraw the DNS. If the DNS is retained, it will be final after the expiration of the comment deadline. Responsible Official: Ms. Geri Walker Enrollment and Demographic Analyst Federal Way Public Schools Telephone: (253) 945-2071 Address: 31405 18th Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 You may appeal this determination in writing by 5:00 p.m., April 30, 2008 to Geri Walker, Federal Way Public Schools, 31405 18th Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003. Date of Issue: April 16, 2008 Date Published: April 16, 2008 S Wermtt PlanICOMP_PLAN_AMENDMENTS120081CPA-2008-4_SchlDistrictsCapFacPlansUpdateslCPA-2008-4_DNS_FedWavkhlDist dac 1 I l 1 2 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAC 197-11-960 Environmental Checklist. Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal(and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. 1 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does ' not apply" In addition, complete the Supplemental Sheet for nonproject actions (part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. 1 2 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: The adoption of a Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan by the Federal Way School District No. 210 for the purposes of planning for the District's facilities needs. The King County, City of Federal Way, City of Kent and the City of Auburn's Comprehensive Plan will be amended to include the District's 2009 Capital Facilities Plan in the Capital Facilities Plan Element. This project may also involve the amendment of the Comprehensive Plans of the city of Des Moines to incorporate the District's 2009 Capital Facilities Plan. 2. Name of applicant: Federal Way School District No. 210. 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Federal Way School District No. 210 31405 18th Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 (253) 945-2000 Contact Person: Ms. Geri Walker Enrollment and Boundary Analyst Telephone: (253) 945-2071 4. Date checklist prepared: April 16, 2008 5. Agency requesting checklist: Federal Way School District No. 210 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): The Federal Way School District's 2009 Capital Facilities Plan is scheduled to be adopted by the District in May 2008. The Capital Facilities Plan will be forwarded to King County, the City of Federal Way, City of Kent and the City of Auburn for inclusion in each jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan. It will also be forwarded to the city of Des Moines for possible inclusion in this jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plans. The District will continue to update the Capital Facilities Plan annually. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject to project-specific environmental review. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. 3 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 1 The Capital Facilities Plan sets forth the capital improvement projects that the District plans to implement over the next six years. These include construction of four elementary schools, Lakeland, Panther Lake, Sunnycrest and Valhalla. This plan also includes construction of Lakota Middle School. Additionally the plan covers the purchase and siting of temporary facilities at various locations. Non-instructional projects included in the plan will consolidate support services operations at a single location. This will include the construction of new facilities to house the Transportation, Maintenance and Nutrition Services departments. Current plans are for all the projects to be complete by 2013. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will undergo additional environmental review, when appropriate, as they are developed. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. Permits will be applied for with the appropriate jurisdiction for siting the temporary facilities and for the construction of Panther Lake and Valhalla Elementary Schools during the 2008 calendar year. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. The District anticipates that King County, the City of Federal Way, the City of Kent and the city of Auburn will adopt this Capital Facilities Plan into their Comprehensive Plan. The city of Des Moines may also adopt this Capital Facilities Plan into the Capital Facilities Elements of their Comprehensive Plans (when issued). 11. Give a brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) This is a non-project action. This proposal involves the adoption of the Federal Way School District's 2009 Capital Facilities Plan for the purpose of planning the District's facilities needs. The District's Capital Facilities Plan will be incorporated into King County's, the City Federal Way's, the City of Kent's and the City of Auburn's Comprehensive Plans. It may also be incorporated into the Comprehensive Plans of the city of Des Moines. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject to project-specific environmental review. A copy of the Capital Facilities Plan may be viewed at the District's offices. 4 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The Capital Facilities Plan will affect the Federal Way School District. The District includes an area of approximately 35 square miles. The City of Federal Way, parts of the cities of Kent, Des Moines and Auburn, parts of unincorporated King County, fall within the District's boundaries. A detailed map of the District's boundaries can be viewed at the District's offices. 5 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS I. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other The Federal Way School District is comprised of a variety of topographic land forms and gradients. Specific topographic characteristics of the sites at which the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan are located have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Specific slope characteristics at the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan j have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Specific soil types found at the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Unstable soils may exist within the Federal Way School District. Specific soil limitations on individual project sites have been or will be identified at the time of project-level environmental review when appropriate. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject, when appropriate, to project-specific environmental review and local approval at the time of proposal. Proposed grading projects, as well as the purpose, type, quantity, and source of any fill materials to be used have been or will be identified at that time. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. It is possible that erosion could occur as a result of the construction projects currently proposed P P J Yp p in the Capital Facilities Plan. The erosion impacts of the individual projects have been or will be evaluated on a site-specific basis at the time of project-specific environmental review when appropriate. Individual projects have been or will be subject to local approval processes. 6 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction(for example, asphalt or buildings?) The proposed renovation projects will require the construction of impervious surfaces. The extent of any impervious cover constructed will vary with each capital facilities project j included in the Capital Facilities Plan. This issue has been or will be addressed during project- specific environmental review when appropriate. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: The erosion potential of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan and appropriate control measures have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. Relevant erosion reduction and control requirements will be met. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Various emissions, many construction-related, may result from the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan. The air-quality impacts of each project have been or will be evaluated during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. Any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: The individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject to project-specific environmental review when appropriate and relevant local approval processes. The District will be required to comply with all applicable air regulations and air permit requirements. Proposed measures specific to the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 7 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. There is a network of surface water bodies within the Federal Way School District. The surface water bodies that are in the immediate vicinity of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. When necessary, the surface water regimes and flow patterns have been or will be researched and incorporated into the designs of the individual projects. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may require work near the surface waters located within the Federal Way School District. Applicable local approval requirements have been or will be satisfied. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Information with respect to the placement or removal of fill and dredge material as a component of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be provided during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. Applicable local regulations have been or will be satisfied. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Any surface water withdrawals or diversions required in connection with the projects j included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project- specific environmental review when appropriate. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Each project included in the Capital Facilities Plan if located in a flood lain area will be P J p p , required to meet applicable local regulations for flood areas. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters. If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. 8 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Specific information regarding the discharge of waste materials that may be required as a result of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be provided during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. b. Ground: 1) Will groundwater be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description,purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may impact groundwater resources. The impact of the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan on groundwater resources has been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. Each project is or will be subject to applicable local regulations. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. The discharges of waste material that may take place in connection with the projects included in the Plan have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review. c. Water Runoff(including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may have storm water runoff consequences. Specific information regarding the storm water impacts of each project has been or will be provided during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. Each project is or will be subject to applicable local storm water regulations. 9 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may result in the discharge of waste materials into ground or surface waters. The specific impacts of each project on ground and surface waters have been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. Each project is or will be subject to all applicable regulations regarding the discharge of waste materials into ground and surface waters. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Specific measures to reduce or control runoff impacts associated with the projects included in p p P J the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. 4. Plants: a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar,pine, other shrubs grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation A variety of vegetative zones are located within the Federal Way School District. Inventories of the vegetation located on the sites of the projects proposed in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be developed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Some of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may require the removal or alteration of vegetation. The specific impacts on vegetation of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. c. List threatened or p endangered species known to be on or near the site. g The specific impacts to these species from the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be determined during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. 10 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plans, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Measures to preserve or enhance vegetation at the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. Each project is or will be subject to applicable local landscaping requirements. 5. Animals: a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: An inventory of species that have been observed on or near the sites of the projects proposed in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be developed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Inventories of threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be developed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. IThe impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan on migration routes have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Appropriate measures to preserve or enhance wildlife have been or will be determined during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. 11 .ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 6. Energy and Natural Resources: a. What kinds of energy(electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. The State Board of Education requires the completion of a life cycle cost analysis of all heating, lighting, and insulation systems before it will permit specific school projects to proceed. The energy needs of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be determined at the time of specific engineering and site design planning when appropriate. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. b. Would our project affect the potential use of solar energy b adjacent properties? If so Y p J p gY Y J p p generally describe: potential The impacts of the protects included in the Capital Facilities Plan on the solar of adjacent projects have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Energy conservation measures proposed in connection with the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be considered during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. 7. Environmental Health: ' a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will comply with all current codes, standards, rules, and regulations. Individual projects have been or will be subject to project-specific environmental review and local approval at the time they are developed when appropriate. 12 KLIENVIRONME ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST N C C S b. Noise: 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? A variety of noises from traffic, construction, residential, commercial and industrial areas exists within the Federal Way School District. The specific noise sources that may affect the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. The District does not anticipate that the projects will create long-term increases in traffic- related or operations-related noise levels. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: The projected noise impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be evaluated and mitigated during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. Each project is or will be subject to applicable local regulations. 8. Land and Shoreline Use: a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? There are a variety of land uses within the Federal Way School District, including residential, commercial, industrial, institutional,utility, open space, recreational, etc. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. The project sites covered under the Capital Facilities Plan have not been used recently for agriculture. c. Describe any structures on the site. The structures located on the proposed sites for the projects included in the Capital Facilities p p P J Plan have been or will be identified and described during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. 13 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? The remodeling and renovation projects will require the demolishment of school structures. The structures that will be demolished as a result of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? The sites that are covered under the Capital Facilities Plan have a variety of zoning classifications under the applicable zoning codes. Site-specific zoning information has been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? d in the Inventories of the comprehensive plan designations for the sites of the projects included Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be completed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Shoreline master program designations of the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Any environmentally sensitive areas located on the sites of the projects included in the Plan have been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? The Federal Way School District currently serves approximately 22,400 students. The student population is expected to increase to 24,000 by the year 2013. The District employs approximately 3,100 people. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Any displacement of people caused by the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be evaluated during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. However, it is not anticipated that the Capital Facilities Plan, or any of the projects contained therein, will displace any people. 14 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be subject to project-specific environmental review and local approval when appropriate. Proposed mitigating measures will be proposed at that time, if necessary. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The compatibility of the specific projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan with existing p tY p J p g uses and plans has been or will be assessed as part of the comprehensive planning process and during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. 9. Housing: a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. No housing units would be provided in connection with the completion of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. It is not anticipated that the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will eliminate any housing units. The impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan on existing housing have been or will be evaluated during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Measures to reduce or control any housing impacts caused by the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. 10. Aesthetics: a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s)proposed? The aesthetic impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. 15 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? The aesthetic impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be determined during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Appropriate measures to reduce or control the aesthetic impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be determined on a project-specific basis when appropriate. 11. Light and Glare: a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? The light or glare impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? The light or glare impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Off-site sources of light or glare that may affect the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be evaluated during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Proposed measures to mitigate light and glare impacts have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. 12. Recreation: a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? There are a variety of formal and informal recreational facilities within the Federal Way School District. 16 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. The recreational impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan, including proposed renovated school and support facilities, may enhance recreational opportunities and uses. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Adverse recreational effects of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject to mitigation during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. A school site usually provides recreational facilities to the community in the form of play fields and gymnasiums. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation: a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. There are no known places or objects listed on, or proposed for such registers on the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan. The existence of historic and cultural resources on or next to the sites has been or will be addressed in more detail during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. An inventory of historical sites at or near the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be developed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Appropriate measures have been or will be proposed on a project-specific basis when appropriate. 14. Transportation: a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The impact on public streets and highways of the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. 17 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the , nearest transit stop? The relationship between the specific projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan and public transit has been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? An inventory of parking spaces located at the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan and the impacts of specific projects on parking availability has been or will be conducted during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). The need for new streets or roads, or improvements to existing streets and roads has been or j will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Use of water, rail, or air transportation has been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. The traffic impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: The mitigation of traffic impacts associated with the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. 15. Public Services: a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection,police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. The District does not anticipate that the projects identified in the Capital Facilities Plan will substantially increase the need for other public services. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. 18 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Remodeled/renovated school or facilities will be built with automatic security systems, fire alarms, smoke alarms, heat sensors, and sprinkler systems. 16. Utilities: a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. Electricity, natural as, water, refuse service, telephone, and sanitary sewer utilities are h' g P rY available at the sites of the projects proposed in the Capital Facilities Plan. The types of utilities available at specific project sites have been or will be addressed in more detail during project- specific environmental review when appropriate. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Utility revisions and construction needs have been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: April 16, 2008 19 ENVI RONMENTAL CHECKLIST D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. I. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? To the extent the Capital Facilities Plan makes it more likely that school facilities will be constructed and/or renovated and remodeled, some of these environmental impacts will be more likely. Additional impermeable surfaces, such as roofs, parking lots, sidewalks, access roads, and playgrounds could increase storm water runoff, which could enter surface or ground waters. Heating systems, emergency generators, and other school equipment that is installed pursuant to the Capital Facilities Plan could result in air emissions. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan should not require the production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances, with the possible exception of the storage of diesel fuel or gasoline for emergency generating equipment. The District does not anticipate a significant increase in the production of noise from its facilities, although the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will increase the District's student capacities. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Proposed measures to mitigate any such increases described above have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. Storm water detention and runoff will meet applicable County and/or City requirements and may be subject to National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ("NPDES") permitting requirements. Discharges to air will meet applicable air pollution control requirements. Fuel oil will be stored in accordance with local and state requirements. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? The Capital Facilities Plan itself will have no impact on these elements of the environment. These impacts have been or will be addressed in more detail during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. The projects included in the Plan are not likely to generate severe impacts on fish or marine life. 20 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: Specific measures to protect and conserve plants, animals, and fish cannot be identified at this time. Specific mitigation proposals have been or will be identified, however, during project- specific environmental review when appropriate. 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? The construction of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will require the consumption of energy. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be constructed in accordance with applicable energy efficiency standards. 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? The Capital Facilities Plan and individual projects contained therein should have no impact on these resources. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: Appropriate measures have been or will be proposed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. Updates of this Plan will be coordinated with King County and the cities of Federal Way, Kent, Des Moines, and Auburn as part of the Growth Management Act process, one of the purposes of which is to protect environmentally sensitive areas. To the extent the District's facilities planning process is part of the overall growth management planning process, these resources are more likely to be protected. 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? The Capital Facilities Plan will not have any impact on land or shoreline use that is incompatible with existing comprehensive plans, land use codes, or shoreline management plans. The District does not anticipate that the Capital Facilities Plan or the projects contained therein will directly affect land and shoreline uses in the area served by the District. e m t i Proposed measures o avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: No measures to avoid or reduce land use impacts resulting from the Capital Facilities Plan or the projects contained therein are proposed at this time. 21 KLI ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may create temporary increases in the District's need for public services and utilities. Upon the completion of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan, however, the District does not anticipate that its need for public services and utilities will increase substantially beyond existing levels. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: No measures to reduce or respond to such demands are proposed at this time. 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local state or federal laws or p p p Y , requirements for the protection of the environment. The Capital Facilities Plan will not conflict with any laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. S IPermtAPMMCOMP_PLAN AMENDMENTS120081CPA-2008-4_SchiDistrwtsCapFacPlansUpdateslCPA-2008-4_ENV-FedWaySchlDtstdac 22 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT AVENUE TO EXCELLENCE June 24, 2008 Charlene Anderson City of Kent v� 220 Fourth Avenue South Kent, WA 98032-5895 Dear Ms. Anderson, Enclosed you will find a copy of the Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plan for 2608 through 2014. The Plan has been prepared and adopted by the Auburn School District Board of Directors on April 28,2008,in conformance with the Growth Management statutes of the State of Washington. Included in the Plan are the following: ❑ Six-Year Enrollment Projections ❑ Auburn School District Standard of Service ❑ The District's overall capacity of the 6-year period ❑ An inventory of existing facilities ❑ Impact Fee Computations ❑ District Capital Construction Plan The Auburn School District Board of Directors is requesting the plan be adopted by reference as part of the capital facilities element of the City of Kent's Comprehensive Plan and that the school impact fees be set in accordance with the plan for the 2009 fiscal year. The Auburn School District is also requesting an increase in the fees for 2009. The. calculated fee for single-family is$5374.64,an increase of$13.60; and the calculated fee for multi-family is$877.02,an increase of$411.24. Please advise if additional information is required or needed. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, NeSael scite Pperations,endent ratio and Copy to: Linda Cowan, Superintendent,Auburn School District w/o enclosure Denise Stiffarm, Kirkpatrick&Lockhart Preston Gates Ellis LLP w/o enclosure Jeff Grose,Executive Director of Capital Projects w/o enclosure 915 Fourth Street NE;Auburn,WA 98002-4452 (253)931-4930 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2008 through 2014 -10 Arthur Jacobsen Elementary School -Opened September 2007 Adopted by the Auburn School District Board of Directors April 28, 2008 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 408 915 Fourth Street NE Auburn, Washington 98002 i (253) 931-4900 j Serving Students in: Unincorporated King County City of Auburn City of Algona City of Kent City of Pacific BOARD of DIRECTORS Craig Schumaker Janice Nelson Ray Vefik Lisa Conners Carol Helgerson Linda S. Cowan Superintendent AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT '--Avenue to Excellence" Table of Contents Section I Executive Summary ....................... Page 1 Section II Enrollment Projections.....................Page 6 Section III Standard of Service........................ Page 8 Section IV Inventory of Facilities...................... Page 15 Section V Pupil Capacity............................... Page 18 Section VI Capital Construction Plan.................Page 21 Section VII Impact Fees.................................. Page 24 Section Vill Appendices................................... Page 28 Appendix A. - Student Enrollment Projections Page 29 PP 1 9 Appendix A.2 -Capital Facilities Plan Projections Page 43 Appendix A.3- Student Generation Survey Page 48 Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2008 through 2014 Section i Executive Summary Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2008 through 2014 I. Executive Summary This Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan(the"Plan") has been prepared by the Auburn School District(the "District") as the District's principal planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act and the adopted ordinances of the counties and cities served by the District. This plan was prepared using data available in the spring of 2008. This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the District. However, this Plan is not intended to be the sole plan for all of the District's needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic long-range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board Policies and actions, taking into account a longer or a shorter time period; other factors and trends in the use of facilities; and other needs of the District as may be required. However, any such plan or plans will be consistent with this Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan. , To enable the collection of impact fees in the unincorporated areas of King County and within the City of Auburn and City of Kent; the King County Council, the City of Auburn and the City of Kent will adopt this Plan by reference as part of each jurisdiction's respective comprehensive plan. To enable the collection of impact fees in the Cities of Algona and Pacific, these municipalities must also adopt this Plan and adopt school impact fee ordinances. Pursuant to the requirements of the Growth Management Act and the local ordinances, the Plan will be updated on an annual basis, and any changes in the fee schedule(s) adjusted accordingly. The Plan establishes the District's"standard of service" in order to ascertain the District's current and future capacity. While the State Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines do not account for the local program needs of the District. The Growth Management Act and the school impact fee ordinance authorize the District to define its standard of service based on the District's specific needs. In general, the District's current standard provides that class size for grades K-2 should not exceed 25 students; class size for grades 3-4 should not exceed 27 students; class size for grade 5 should not exceed 30 students. When averaged over the six elementary grades, this computes to 26.5 students per classroom. Class size for grades 6-12 should not exceed 30 students, with some subject areas restricted to lesser numbers. (See Section III for more specific information.) 2 The capacity of the schools in the District is calculated based on this standard of service and the existing inventory of facilities including transitional classrooms. The District's 2007-08 capacity was 13,743 whereas Full Time Equivalent ("FTE") enrollment for this same period was 13,847.16 (includes Full Day Kindergarten). The actual number of individual students was 14,559 as of October 1, 2007. (See Section V for more specific information.) The capital construction plan shown in Section VI addresses the additions to the District's existing facilities. This provided for a new high school approved by the voters in February 2003 and opened in September 2005; and the addition of two new elementary schools approved by the voters in February 2005; with Lakeland Hills Elementary opening in the Fall of 2006 and Arthur Jacobsen Elementary opening in the Fall of 2007. The plan includes the construction of a new middle school, as well as the acquisition of a future school sites to accommodate growth. The new facilities are required to meet the projected student population increase to be generated from the large development areas within the Auburn School District. Three areas that have significant impact on the school district are the Lakeland South, the Lea Hill, and the north Auburn valley areas of the district. There are other pockets of development that impact the District as well. The City of Kent has an area of approximately 158 acres that was sold to developers in 2004. The School Impact Fee Ordinances adopted by King County, the City of Auburn and the City of Kent provide for the assessment of impact fees to assist in meeting some of the fiscal impact incurred by a District experiencing growth and development. Section VII sets forth the proposed school impact fees for single family and multi-family dwelling units. The student generation factors have been generated using the students who actually attend school in the Auburn School District from single family and multi-family developments constructed in the last five years. The method of collecting the data is with the use of GIS mapping software, data from King County and Pierce County GIS; and to integrate the mapping with student data from the district's student data system. This method gives the District actual student generation numbers for each grade span for identified developments. This data is contained in Appendix A.3. ' 3 Aubum School District No.408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2008 through 2014 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CHANGES FROM 2007 TO 2008 Listed below is a summary level outline of the changes from the 2007 Capital Facilities Plan that are a part of the 2008 Plan. The changes are noted by Section for ease of reference. Section I Executive Summary A. Updated to reflect new information within the Plan. B. Summary level list of changes from previous year. Section II Enrollment Projections Updated projections. See Appendices A.1 &A.2. Section III Standard of Service A. Increase in Adaptive Behavior program required 2 additional classrooms at the elementary level. B. Reduction of 1 structure learning program classroom at elementary level C. Increase of 2 early childhood classrooms at elementary level D. Reduction of 1 second grade TOSA program at elementary level E. Increase of 7 full day kindergarten classrooms at elementary level F. Reduction of 2 English as second language classrooms at high school level G. Increase of 2 classrooms for 18-21 year old Transition program at high school level H. Reduction of 2 special education resource rooms at high school level Section IV Inventory of Facilities Updated to include portables at Mt. Baker Middle School for Fall of 2008. Section V Pupil Capacity Updated to include portables at Mt. Baker Middle School for Fall of 2008. 4 Auburn School District No.408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2008 through 2014 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY i ' Section VII Impact Fees CHANGES TO IMPACT FEE DATA ELEMENTS 2007 to 2008 CPF CPF DATA ELEMENTS 2007 2008 EXPLANATION Student Generation Factors Single Family Consistent with King County Ordinance 11621, Elementary 0.3120 0.3370 Student Generation Factors are calculated Mid School 0.1270 0.1450 by the school district based on district Sr. High 0.1610 0.1780 records of average actual student generation Multi-Family rates for new developments constructed Elementary 0.0460 0.0650 over the last five years. Mid School 0.0190 0.0290 Sr. High 0.0340 0.0390 School Construction Costs Elementary $21,500,000 $21,750,000 Updated project estimated costs. Middle School $42,000,000 $42,500,000 Updated project estimated costs. Site Aquistion Costs Cost per acre $228,269 $272,387 Updated estimates on land costs Boeckh Index $154.22 $168.43 Updated to projected SPI schedule.(G. Beck) Match % -State 58.11% 59.32% Updated to current SPI schedule. Match % -District 41.89% 40.68% Computed District Average AV Single Family $257,404 $290,617 Updated from January 2008 King County Dept of Assessments data. Multi-Family $69,427 $78,574 Updated from January 2008 King County Dept of Assessments data using weighted L average. Debt Sery Tax Rate $2.14 $1.79 Current Fiscal Year GO Bond Int Rate 4.08% 5.11% Current Rate (Bond Buyers 20 Index 3-08) Section VIII Appendices Appendix A.1 - Updated enrollment projections from October 1, 2007 Appendix A.2 - Updates enrollment projections with anticipated buildout schedule. Appendix A.3- Student Generation Survey March 2008 5 r 1 Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2008 through 2014 1 Section II Enrollment Projections 1 Aubum School Distnct No.408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2008through 2014 ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS The Auburn School District uses a modified cohort survival model to project future enrollment for all of the District's operations. Table 11.1 is an extract from the comprehensive projection model found in Appendix A.2 titled "CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Enrollment Projections". This Table shows the anticipated enrollment for the next six years based on the previous 13 year history of the District under the assumptions set forth in the comprehensive projections, Appendix A.1, and the projection for additional students generated from new developments in the district as shown in Appendix A.2. ' TABLE ASD ENROLLMENT , 11.1 PROJECTIONS March 2008 ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ GRADE 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 ' KDG 996 1011 1032 1057 1082 1099 1115 1 995 1065 1086 1112 1138 1155 1172 2 1019 1018 1093 1119 1145 1163 1180 3 997 1049 1054 1134 1160 1178 1195 4 1057 1024 1082 1092 1173 1190 1208 5 1078 1087 1060 1124 1134 1207 1225 K-5 6142 6255 6407 6638 6832 6991 7094 ' 6 1007 1103 1118 1097 1161 1163 1235 7 1057 1035 1137 1158 1137 1192 1193 8 1033 1081 1065 1173 1194 1164 1219 6-8 3097 3220 3320 3428 3492 3518 3647 9 1337 1350 1410 1408 1523 1539 1514 ' 10 1368 1280 1299 1364 1359 1461 1475 11 1352 1287 1203 1224 1285 1266 1365 12 1263 1276 1215 1134 1153 1202 1181 9- 12 5320 5192 5126 5129 5320 5468 5534 TOTALS 14559 14667 14853 15195 15645 15977 16276 GRADES K-12 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 K-5 w/K @ 1/2 5644 5750 5891 6110 6292 6442 6536 6-8 3097 3220 3320 3428 3492 3518 3647 9-12 5320 5192 5126 5129 5320 5468 5534 K-12 w/K @ 1/2 14061 14162 14338 14667 15104 15428 15718 , Note: The district is currently operating Full Day Kindergarten in seven schools and will have two state funded Full Day Kindergarten at two additional elementary schools. 7 Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2008 through 2014 Section III Standard of Service Aubum School District No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2008 through 2014 STANDARD OF SERVICE , The School Impact Fee Ordinances adopted by King County, the City of Auburn and the City of Kent indicate that each school district must establish a "Standard of Service"in ' order to ascertain the overall capacity to house its projected student population. The Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage "capacity"guidelines for computing state funding support. The fundamental purpose of the SPI guidelines is to provide a vehicle to equitably ' distribute state matching funds for school construction projects. By default these guidelines have been used to benchmark the district's capacity to house its student population. The SPI guidelines do not make adequate provision for local district program needs, facility configurations, emerging educational reform, or the dynamics of each student's educational program. The Auburn ' School District Standard of Service addresses those local considerations that require space in excess of the SPI guidelines. The effect on the space requirements for both permanent and relocatable facilities is shown below for each grade articulation pattern. Conditions that may , result in potential space needs are provided for information purposes without accompanying computations. OVERVIEW ' The Auburn School District operates fourteen elementary schools housing 6,033 students in grades K through 5. The 670 of the 995 Kindergarten students attend 1/2 days throughout the year. Grades 1 through 5, plus 325 kindergartners, attend on a full day basis. When converted to a full time equivalence the K-5 enrollment is 5,807. Four middle schools house 3,200 students in grades 6 through 8. The District operates three comprehensive senior high schools and one alternative high school housing 5,320 students in grades 9 through 12. The District opened the fourth high school in the fall of 2005. ' CLASS SIZE The number of pupils per classroom determines the number of classrooms required to house the student population. Class sizes are subject to collective bargaining. Changes to class size agreements can have significant impact on available space. The current pupil/teacher limit across all elementary programs is an average of 26.5 students per teacher. Consistent with this staffing limit, room capacities are set at 26.5 students per room at grades K-5. At grades 6- 12 the limit is set at 30 pupils per room. The SPI space allocation for each grade , articulation level, less the computed reduction for the Auburn School District Standard of Service, determines the District's capacity to house projected pupil populations. These reductions are shown below by grade articulation level. ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS STRUCTURED LEARNING FOR DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED SPECIAL EDUCATION ' The Auburn School District operates a structured learning program for students with moderate to severe disabilities at the elementary school level which currently uses ten classrooms to provide for 105 students. The housing requirements for this program are provided for in the SPI space guidelines. No loss of ' capacity is expected unless population with disabilities grows at a disproportionate rate compared to total elementary population. ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR , The Auburn School District operates an adaptive behavior program for students with behavior disabilities at the elementary school level. The program uses two classrooms to provide for 20 students. The housing requirements for this program exceed the SPI space allocations by two classrooms. , Loss of Permanent Capacity 2 rooms @ 26.5 each = (53) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (53) 9 ' Auburn School District No.408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2008 through 2014 ' STANDARD OF SERVICE SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program at the elementary level for special education students requiring instruction to address their specific disabilities. Seventeen standard classrooms are required to house this program. The housing requirements for this program exceed 1 the SPI space guidelines by ten standard classrooms. The loss of capacity is expected as growth in program is larger than the total elementary population. Loss of Permanent Capacity 10 rooms @ 26.5 each = (265) ' Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (265) NATIVE AMERICAN RESOURCE ROOM The Auburn School District operates one resource room to support the education of Native American ' students at the elementary level. One standard classroom is fully dedicated to serve these students. Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 room @ 26.5 each = (27) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (27) HEAD START ' The Auburn School District operates a Head Start program for approximately 125 youngsters in six sections of 1/2 day in length. The program is housed at three elementary schools and utilizes three standard elementary classrooms and auxiliary office space. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 3 rooms @ 26.5 each = (80) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (80) EARLY CHILDHOOD SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates a pre-school program for young children with disabilities below age five. This program is housed at eight different elementary schools and currently uses nine standard classrooms. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines.Loss of Permanent Capacity 9 rooms @ 26.5 each = (239) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (239) READING LABS ' The Auburn School District operates a program for students needing remediation and additional language arts instruction. These programs utilize non-standard classroom spaces if available in each elementary school. Four elementary schools do not have non-standard rooms available, thus they are housed in a standard classroom. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 26.5 each = (106) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (106) 10 Auburn School Distnct No.408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2008 through 2014 STANDARD OF SERVICE MUSIC ROOMS The district elementary music programs require one acoustically modified classroom at each elementary school for music instruction. The housing requirements are not provided for , in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 14 rooms @ 26.5 each = (371) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (371) ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE PROGRAM ' The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at the elementary school level for students learning English as a second language. This program requires fourteen standard classrooms that are not , provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 14 rooms @ 26.5 each = (371) , Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (371) SECOND GRADE TOSA PROGRAM The Auburn School District provides a TOSA reading specialist program for seven highly impacted elementary schools. This pullout model provides direct instruction to students who are not at grade level and do not receive other services. This program requires seven standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 7 rooms @ 26.5 each = (186) , Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (186) , ELEMENTARY LEARNING SPECIALIST PROGRAM The Auburn School District provides a learning specialist program to increase literacy skills for first and second graders. This program model has been created from the 1-728 funds and currently has the specialist going into existing teacher classrooms, as well as pulling out students into designated classrooms. The district is utilizing classrooms at all fourteen elementary schools. Loss of Permanent Capacity 14 rooms @ 26.5 each = (371) , Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (371) FULL DAY KINDERGARTEN , The Auburn School District provides Full-Day Kindergarten programs to increase academic skills for kindergarten students. This program model has been created from tuition, 1-728 funds and currently has two schools receiving state funding for 2008-09 school year. The district is utilizing fifteen classrooms at nine of the fourteen elementary schools. Housing requirements exceed the OSPI space guidelines for this program by seven classrooms. Loss of Permanent Capacity 7 rooms @ 26.5 each = (186) , Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (186) 1 11 Aubum School District No.408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2008 through 2014 ' STANDARD OF SERVICE MIDDLE SCHOOLS ' SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program for each grade at the middle school level. This is to accommodate special education students needing remedial instruction to address their specific disabilities. Nine classrooms are required at the middle level to provide for approximately 300 students. The housing requirements for this program are not entirely provided for in the SPI space guidelines. ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR SPECIAL EDUCATION ' The Auburn School District provides a transition program for students with moderate to severe disabilities. The program is housed at one of the middle schools and uses one classroom. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space allocations. STRUCTURED LEARNING CENTER AND DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates four structured learning classrooms at the middle school level for students with moderate to severe disabilities and one developmentally disabled classroom for students with profound disabilities. Two of the five classrooms for this program are provided for in the SPI space allocations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 3 rooms @ 26.5 each = (80) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (80) 1 MIDDLE SCHOOL COMPUTER LABS The Auburn School District operates a minimum of one computer lab at each middle school. This program utilizes a standard classroom per middle school. The housing requirements for this program ' are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 30 each = (120) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (120) ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at the middle school level for students learning English as a second language. This program requires four standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. ' Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 30 each = (120) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (120) ROOM UTILIZATION The Auburn School District provides a comprehensive middle school program that includes elective options in special interest areas. Facilities to accommodate special interest activities are not amenable to standard classroom usage. The district averages 95% utilization of all available teaching stations. SPI Report#3 dated 1/22/08 identifies 148 teaching stations available in the 1 mid-level facilities. The utilization pattern results in a loss of approximately 8 teaching stations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 rooms @ 30 each = (240) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (240) 12 Aubum School District No.408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2008 through 2014 STANDARD OF SERVICE , SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS SENIOR HIGH COMPUTER LABS ' The Auburn School District operates two computer labs at each of the senior high schools. This program utilizes two standard classrooms at comprehensive high schools and one at West Auburn. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 7 rooms @ 30 each = (210) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 , Total Capacity Loss (210) ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at three comprehensive high schools for students learning English as a second language. This program requires three standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. , Loss of Permanent Capacity 3 rooms @ 30 each = (90) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (90) STRUCTURED LEARNING CENTER PROGRAM , The Auburn School District operates four structured learning center classrooms for 40 students with moderate to severe disabilities. The housing requirements for this program are provided for in the SPI space guidelines. TRANSITION PROGRAM FOR 18-21 YEAR OLD , The Auburn School District operates a transition program for 18-21 year old students with moderate to severe disabilities. Two classrooms are utilized for this program that connects students to the community and work. ' The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 2 rooms @ 30 each = (60) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (60) SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS , The Auburn School District operates a resource room program at the senior high level for special education students requiring instruction to address their specific learning disabilities. The current senior high school program requires eleven classrooms to provide for approximately 370 students. The SPI space guidelines provide for one of the eleven teaching stations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 10 rooms @ 30 each = (300) , Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (300) PERFORMING ARTS CENTERS ' Auburn High School includes 25,000 square feet used exclusively for a Performing Arts Center. The SPI Inventory includes this space when computing unhoused student capacity. This space was not intended for nor is it usable for classroom instruction. It was constructed to provide a community center for the performing arts. Using SPI capacity guidelines, 25,000 square feet computes to 208 unhoused students or 8.33 classrooms. Loss of Permanent Capacity 8.33 rooms @ 30 each = (250) 13 , Auburn School District No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2008 through 2014 STANDARD OF SERVICE ROOM UTILIZATION The Auburn School District provides a comprehensive high school program that includes numerous elective options in special interest areas. Facilities to accommodate special interest activities are not amenable to standard classroom usage. The district averages 95% utilization of all available teaching stations. SPI Report#3 dated 1/22/08 identifies 148 teaching stations available in the senior high facilities. The utilization pattern results in a loss of approximately 10 teaching stations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 10 rooms @ 30 each = (300) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (300) STANDARD OF SERVICE COMPUTED TOTALS ELEMENTARY Loss of Permanent Capacity= (2,253) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (2,253) MIDDLE SCHOOL Loss of Permanent Capacity= (560) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (560) SENIOR HIGH Loss of Permanent Capacity= (1,210) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (1,210) TOTAL Loss of Permanent Capacity= (4,022) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (4,022) 14 Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2008 through 2014 Section IV Inventory of Facilities Auburn School District No.408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2008 through 2014 , INVENTORY OF FACILITIES Table IV.1 shows the current inventory of permanent district facilities and their OSPI rated capacities. Table IV.2 shows the number and location of each portable unit by school. The district uses relocatable ' facilities to: 1. provide interim housing in school attendance areas uniquely impacted by increasing school populations that would otherwise require continual redistricting. 2. make space available for changing program requirements and offerings determined by unique student needs, and 3. provide housing to cover district needs until permanent facilities can be financed and constructed. Relocatable facilities are deemed to be interim, stop gap measures that often place undesirable stress on existing physical plants. Core facilities(i.e. gymnasiums,restrooms,kitchens, labs, lockers, libraries,etc.)are not of sufficient size or quantity to handle the increased school population served by adding relocatable classrooms. Table Permanent Facilities District School Facilities IV.1 @ OSPI Rated Capacity (January 2008) Building Capacity Acres Address Elementa Schools Washington Elementary 492 5.40 20 E Street Northeast,Auburn WA,98002 , Terminal Park Elementary 401 6.70 1101 D Street Southeast,Auburn WA,98002 Dick Scobee Elementary 550 10.50 1031 14th Street Northeast,Auburn WA 98002 Pioneer Elementary 415 8.30 2301 M Street Southeast,Auburn WA,98002 Chinook Elementary 485 8.75 3502 Auburn Way South,Auburn WA,98092 Lea Hill Elementary 459 10.00 30908 124th Avenue Southeast,Auburn WA,98092 Gildo Rey Elementary 531 10.00 1005 37th Street Southeast,Auburn WA,98002 Evergreen Heights Elem. 456 8.09 5602 South 316th,Auburn WA,98001 Al ac Elementary 494 10.60 310 Milwaukee Boulevard North,Pacific WA,98047 Lake View Elementary 595 16.40 16401 Southeast 318th Street,Auburn WA,98092 Hazelwood Elementary 578 12.67 11815 Southeast 304th Street Auburn WA,98092 Ilalko Elementary 585 12.00 301 Oravetz Place Southeast,Auburn WA,98092 Lakeland Hills Element 585* 12.00 1020 Evergreen Way SE,Auburn WA,98092 Arthur Jacobsen Elementary 585* 10.00 29205 132" Street SE,Auburn,WA 98092 ELEM CAPACITY 7211 Middle Schools Cascade Middle School 836 17.30 1 1015 24th Street Northeast, Auburn WA,98002 Olympic Middle School 898 17.40 1825 K Street Southeast,Auburn WA,98002 Rainier Middle School 849 26.33 30620 116th Avenue Southeast Auburn WA,98092 Mt.Baker Middle School 845 30.88 620 37th Street Southeast, Auburn WA,98002 MS CAPACITY 3,428 Senior Hi h Schools West Auburn High School 231 5.10 401 West Main Street, Auburn WA,98001 Auburn Senior High 2,261 18.60 800 Fourth Street Northeast,Auburn WA,98002 Auburn Riverside HS 1,388 33.00 501 Oravetz Road,Auburn WA,98092 Auburn Mountainview HS 1,431 40.00 28900 124`h Ave SE,Auburn,WA 98092 SH CAPACITY 5,311 TOTAL CAPACITY 15,950 *Estimated-Not included in January 2008 OSPI Report 16 Auburn School District No.408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2008 through 2014 INVENTORY OF FACILITIES TABLE TEMPORARY/RELOCATABLE IV.2 FACILITIES INVENTORY (March 2008) Elementary Location 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Washington 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Terminal Park 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Dick Scobee 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Pioneer 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Chinook 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Lea Hill 5 5 2 2 2 2 2 Gildo Rey 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 Evergreen Heights 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 Alpac 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Lake View 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Hazelwood 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ilalko 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Lakeland Hills Elementary 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 Arthur Jacobsen Elementary 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL UNITS 30 30 31 31 31 31 31 TOTAL CAPACITY 795 795 822 822 822 822 822 Middle School Location 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Cascade 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 Olympic 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 Rainier 5 5 5 8 8 8 8 Mt. Baker 4 6 6 8 8 8 8 TOTAL UNITS 9 11 11 18 20 20 20 TOTAL CAPACITY 270 330 330 540 600 600 600 Sr.High School Location 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 West Auburn 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 Auburn 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Auburn Riverside 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 Auburn Mountainview 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL UNITS 25 25 25 26 26 26 26 TOTAL CAPACITY 750 750 750 780 780 780 780 COMBINED TOTAL UNITS 64 66 67 75 77 77 77 COMBINED TOTAL CAPACITY 1,815 1,875 1,902 2,142 2,202 2,202 2,202 1 17 Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan ' 2008 through 2014 Section V Pupil Capacity Aubum School District No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2008 through 2014 PUPIL CAPACITY ' While the Auburn School District uses the SPI inventory of permanent facilities as the data from which to determine space needs, the District's educational program requires more space than that provided for under the formula. This additional square footage is converted to numbers of pupils in ' Section III, Standard of Service. The District's capacity is adjusted to reflect the need for additional space to house its programs. Changes in the capacity of the district recognize new unfunded facilities. The combined effect of these adjustments is shown on Line B in Tables V.1 and V.2 below. Table V.1 shows the Distict's capacity with relocatable units included and Table V.2 without these units. Table VA Capacity WITH relocatables 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 A. SPI Capacity 15,365 15,950 15,950 15,950 15,950 16,750 16,750 A.1 SPI Capacity-New Ele 585 585 1/ A.2 SPI Capacity- New MS 800 B. Capacity Adjustments 2,207 2,147 2,120 1,880 1,820 1,820 1,820 C. Net Capacity 13,743 13,803 13,830 14,070 14,930 14,930 15,515 D. ASD Enrollment 14,559 14,667 14,853 15,195 15,645 15,977 16,276 3/ E. ASD Surplus/Deficit (816) (864) (1,024) (1,125) (715) (1,048) (761) CAPACITY ADJUSTMENTS Include Relocatable 1,815 1,875 1,902 2,142 2,202 2,202 2,202 2/ Exclude SOS pg 14 4,022 4,022 4,022 4,022 4,022 4,022 4,022 Total Adjustments (2,207) (2,147) (2,120) (1,880) (1,820) (1,820) (1,820) Table V.2 Capacity WITHOUT relocatables 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 A. SPI Capacity 15,365 15,950 15,950 15,950 15,950 16,750 16,750 A.1 SPI Capacity-New Ele 585 585 1/ A.2 SPI Capacity- New MS 800 B. Capacity Adjustments 4,022 4,022 4,022 4,022 4,022 4,022 4,022 C. Net Capacity 11,928 11,928 11,928 11,928 12,728 12,728 13,313 D. ASD Enrollment 14,559 14,667 14,853 15,195 15,645 15,977 16,276 3/ E. ASD Surplus/Deficit (2,631) (2,739) (2,925) (3,267) (2,916) (3,249) (2,963) CAPACITY ADJUSTMENTS 2/ Exclude SOS g 14 4,022 4,022 4,022 4,022 4,022 4,022 4,022 1 Total Adjustments (4,022) (4,022) (4,022) (4,022) (4,022) (4,022) (4,022) 1/ New facilities shown in 2011-12 are not funded under the current Capital Facilities Plan. 2/ The Standard of Service represents 25.38%of SPI capacity. When new facilities are added the Standard of Service computations are decreased to 23.35%of SPI capacity 3/ Students beyond the capacity are accomodated in other spaces(commons, library,theater,shared teaching space). 19 Auburn School District No.408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2008 through 2014 PERMANENT FACILITIES PUPIL CAPACITY @ SPI Rated Capacity (March 2008 A. Elementary Schools Building 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Washington 492 492 492 492 492 492 492 Terminal Park 401 401 401 401 401 401 401 Dick Scobee 550 550 550 550 550 550 550 Pioneer 415 415 415 415 415 415 415 Chinook 485 485 485 485 485 485 485 Lea Hill 459 459 459 459 459 459 459 Gildo Rey 531 531 531 531 531 531 531 Ever Heights 456 456 456 456 456 456 456 Alpac 494 494 494 494 494 494 494 Lake View 595 595 595 595 595 595 595 Hazelwood 578 578 578 578 578 578 578 Ilalko 585 585 585 585 585 585 585 Lakeland Hills 585 585 585 585 585 585 585 Arthur Jacobsen 585 585 585 585 585 585 585 Elementary#15 585 ELEM CAPACITY 7,211 7,211 7,211 7,211 7,211 7,211 7,796 B. Middle Schools Building 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Cascade 836 836 836 836 836 836 836 Olympic 898 898 898 898 898 898 898 Rainier 849 849 849 849 849 849 849 Mt. Baker 845 845 845 845 845 845 845 Middle School#5 0 0 0 0 800 800 800 MS CAPACITY 3,428 3,428 1 3,428 1 3,428 1 4,2281 4,228 1 4,228 C Senior High Schools Building 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 West Auburn 231 231 231 231 231 231 231 Auburn 2,261 2,261 2,261 2,261 2,261 2,261 2,261 Auburn Riverside 1,388 1,388 1,388 1,388 1,388 1,388 1,388 Auburn Mountainview 1,431 1,431 1,431 1,431 1,431 1,431 1,431 SH CAPACITY 1 5,311 1 5,311 1 5,311 1 5,311 1 5,311 1 5,311 1 5,311 COMBINED CAPACITY 1 15,950 1 15,950 1 15,950 1 15,950 1 16,750 1 16,750 1 17,335 1 20 Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2008 through 2014 Section VI Capital Construction Plan Aubum School Distnct No.408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2008 through 2014 CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN The formal process used by the Board to address current and future facility needs began in 1974 with the formation of a community wide citizens committee. The result of this committee's work was published in the document titled'Guidelinesfor Development.' In 1985 the Board formed a second Ad Hoc citizens committee to pick up from the work of the first and address the needs of the District for subsequent years. The work of this committee was published in the document titled 'Directions for the Nineties.' In 1995 the Board commissioned a third Ad Hoc citizens committee to make recommendations for improvements to the District's programs and physical facilities. The committee recommendations are published in the document titled 'Education Into The Twenty-First Century--A Community Involved.' The 1995 Ad Hoc committee recommended the District develop plans for the implementation,funding,and deployment of technology throughout the District's programs. The 1996 Bond proposition provided funding to enhance the capacity of each facility to accommodate technological applications. The 1998 Capital Levy provided funding to further deploy technology at a level sufficient to support program requirements in every classroom and department. In 2005 a replacement technology levy was approved to continue to support technology across all facets of the District's teaching,learning and operations. In addition to the technology needs of the District the Ad Hoc committee recognized the District must prepare for continued student enrollment growth. As stated in their report, "the District must pursue an appropriate high school site as soon as possible." The Ad Hoc recommendation included commentary that the financing should be timed to maintain consistent rates of assessment. A proposition was approved by the voters on April 28, 1998 that provided$8,000,000 over six years to address some of the technology needs of the District; and$5,000,000 to provide funds to acquire school sites. During the 1997-98 school year a Joint District Citizen's Ad Hoc Committee was appointed by the Auburn and Dieringer School Boards to make recommendations on how best to serve the school population from an area that includes a large development known as Lakeland South. Lakeland South at that time was immediately adjacent to the southern boundary of the Auburn School District. On June 16, 1998 the Ad Hoc Committee presented its recommendation at a joint meeting of the Auburn and Dieringer Boards of Directors. On June 22, 1998 the Auburn School Board adopted Resolution No. 933 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries of the District in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. On June 23, 1998 the Dieringer School Board adopted a companion Resolution No. 24-97-98 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. These actions resulted in the transfer of an area from Dieringer to Auburn containing most of the Lakeland South development and certain other undeveloped properties. Development in this area is progressing at an aggressive rate. In April of 2002,the Board formed a fifth citizen's Ad Hoc committee to address the following two items and make recommendations to the board in the Fall of 2002: a. A review of the conclusion and recommendations of 1985 and 1995 Ad Hoc Committees related to accommodating high school enrollment growth. This included the review of possible financing plans for new facilities. b. Develop recommendations for accommodating high school enrollment growth for the next 10 years if a new senior high school is not built. This committee recommended the board place the high school on the ballot for the fifth time in February 2003. The February election approved the new high school at 68.71%yes votes. The school opened in the Fall of 2005. In the Fall of 2003 the school board directed the administration to begin the planning and design for Elementary#13 and Elementary#14. In the Fall of 2004,the Auburn School Board passed Resolution No. 1054 to place on the ballot in February 2005 two elementary schools. The voters approved the ballot measure in February of 2005 at 64.72%. Lakeland Hills Elementary(Elementary#13)opened in the Fall of 2006. Arthur Jacobsen Elementary(Elementary#14)is located in the Lea Hill area on a 10 acre site and opened in the Fall of 2007. These two elementary schools were built to accommodate the housing growth in Lakeland Hills and Lea Hill areas of the school district. 22 Auburn School District No.408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2008 through 2014 CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN In the 2004-05 school year,the Board convened a sixth Citizen's Ad Hoc committee to again study and make recommendations about the future impacts in the District. One of the areas of study was the need for New Facilities and Modernization. The committee made a number of recommendations including school size,the need for a new middle school,and to begin a capital improvements program to modernize or replace facilities based upon criterion. During the 2005-06 school year,a Joint District Citizen's Ad Hoc Committee was appointed by the Auburn and Kent School Boards to make recommendations on how best to serve the school population that will come from an area that includes a number of projected developments in the north Auburn valley. On May 17,2006 the Ad Hoc Committee presented its recommendation at a joint meeting of the Auburn and Kent Boards of Directors. On June 14,2006 the Kent School Board adopted Resolution No. 1225 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries of the District in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. On June 26,2006 the Auburn School Board adopted a companion Resolution No. 1073 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. These actions resulted in the transfer of an area from the Kent School District to the Auburn School District effective September 29,2006. The District is projecting 1717 additional students within the six year period including the Lakeland,Lea Hill, and north Auburn valley areas. This increase in student population will require the acquisition of new middle school and new elementary school sites and construction of a middle school and elementary school during the six year window. Based upon the District's capacity data and enrollment projections, as well as the student generation data included in Appendix A.3,the District has determined that approximately eighty-six percent of the capacity improvements are necessary to serve the students generated from new development,with the remaining additional capacity required to address existing need. The table below illustrates the current capital construction plan for the next six years. The exact timelines are wholly dependent on the rate of growth in the school age population and passage of bond issues. 2008-14 Capital Construction Plan March 2008 Projected Fund Project Timelines Project Funded Cost Source 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-13 13-14 All Facilities- 2006 Technology Yes $12,000,000 6 Year XX XX XX XX Modernization Cap Lev Impact Portables Yes $1,200,000 Fees XX XX XX XX XX XX XX 1/ Property Purchase Impact New Middle School Yes $7,000,000 Fees XX XX New Elementary Yes $3,500,000 State Mat XX XX XX Bond XX Arthur Jacobsen Elem Yes $21,500,000 impact Fee open Bond XX XX XX XX 1/ Middle School#5 No $42,500,000 Impact Fee Ian const const open Bond XX XX XX 1/ FElementary#15 No $21,750,000 1 Im act Fee Ian const open 1/ These funds may be secured through local bond issues,sale of real property,impact fees,and state matching funds. The District currently is not eligible for state assistance at the elementary school level. 23 Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2008 through 2014 i Section VI Impact Fees l i cl) to U - EfT W E Eo o h E moq CO a � O co O a) Lo mo L OOO CO LLOCD C o o LL N COo d o o of O cM O 00 - O is NEhe A 9 9 E � � �S� �! V N N yN ^M .- S O NMM f 0 N N N N ; N O CO co OOdf 0 L� O U Lo(D o o O M � U� 9 � � � 1( � �N f j 1 T T E o o 0 E o 0 o E O O E o o 0 mW) rnrn m mLnmm mlgirnrn mtnrnrn LL CO N co LL co N M LL CO N Cl) LL CO N M - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 U5 0 0 0 N U C7 o O U 0 0 0 0 0 0 LL N U- m IL LL O CL C9 O LY O O a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 co JQ � LLM � ano Li � LLm �tr- LL U- c) mLLmW) ao 0 N M L M r d U N cl U ? M Q. 0 C o 0 0 ; 0 C 0 0 0 7 N C1 O o o N CI 0 0 0 o N U) Ln _� cn in Ln z � _ N U f0 U) U U ; L O O L7 J , y LL ~ LL O OV � 'T' O LL O O O «O Q LL d 0 0 N \ \ \ N Q rLi - 0 0 CW.1 C U 0 0 0 V �` U d 0 0 LL w N N N � �- c m CLLo Lo 2 c rnrnrn 2 `�° � 000 c N mMMM cJ o oLLU ma poop a � ° 000 � p2 WoU'iLo N m LL W a ° ~ W H ' ~ 65 L U n U U CD -O t to x y M h LL '� O p 0 O y LL N LO U _ °) .� O O ° O O O U N CA O O U N f0 O O .C. a «m O O M a NV < r-- V v minlnco � U D mCONMM OUl0 o LL p ° LL cui x a � x � x w �, OC O LL ' N ' N h O ~ a m a� I- in o min W LL ° ti '3 a W Q rn 2 _ $ � 2 Z, a � F Y x Cl) M Cl) c d m V coNU) O 'er Noo O — v, co u) mv, v, v aO T O Z N c- N 7 C1 m c3 O !n o O m C.) ) 0 N 0 W � 'O O c0 c0 Ca 0 W a U V LL m U 1� L� LL m U 0, x ° c CO CO CO S4 L. CO C u LL � N :�:, LL x M h ° o � '4.t o '�' p w � � e3 V@ 3 x V V V V W « $ ern ¢ � ¢ � � L O �* Cn > o gZLL E � v E � � � 0 I► L V co co " "� U Z " LL LL `a U V N fn +� O �p !!) m N Y L m N L m Q m y V `� O L Q ° o.. V L O ° 0 v ° L W Y L v ° m lu o � v = W o yv = � v = Q E E � _ w � LL whin LL whin � Li whin ail° whin � � � � ) c QLL Q; � � t o w � # � ) L § % 2 ■ M /� toF- co o C*4o � _E q © ui q Roo _ = wawo « 1- d �� } /� � � �\ \ co f Bc, o a p � k 2 / 2 k m LL ` CM x ° g 7 2 e u co / LL / ? { \ / 8 8 $ ~ $ _j a 2 c § \ % $ LL .0 x co � »� 0 CD a mKgcy § $ 8 ■ k t o / a % $ - 8 k $ f- k § 7 mMa) = 2 ) � A _ » » C _ , 2 � h - ) EE &; Ate K A co & 2 ; & = 2 0 � BI ® —_ � � ® § & k ; § ° _ > k 20 I � CL ° uz / � § cli tea $ « # - ® § a k § ƒƒ � a a C 7 » g g 2 \ § s » � � . � . . Q § ° co t C � k « - \ / § . 6 § kk Q \ � 2 w � \ § \ k � 06 � 3 y 2 © 2 a o U e a [ \ ® ] w [ ) a § t ) . ± w ) m � w G L e w m e LL L z � � � 1 Cl) a I� 0) Cj d7 p co CNC) op o V ' � T o .0. U Cl)p M p O C O M n1 Co O O CD M O0 M Co L N j N to O O `' M NN4 P- U I- a) M s- � � � � � C,q d 0 C1 JC L O O n Ct OD N n M o o f0 O LL NO 00 M00 N N N N n O O coO c M coM '- �, p J 2 O N LQ N N M M 69 COC) Q% E!) CA f~0O Q N D J O M E Lo O p p O W co I I CO ns o o Cl) N CO t- O o co .0C O) p LC) CO - N M N co O O O co Cl) CO I� _N j V W Y N O O tS (q O n NCN N � LO � M L 1- 6F. LO a _ 1 69 a m L O con N co n \ o M \ \ n o C L 0 m - p � M Cn n O c C. N C0 CO O) o Q LL o _ S CD N N CM N co O 0 04 Co 0 Cl) co Cl) CO O n �_ C 00 (n O O N N I� f- 0 M Co � d N Efl L6 t O In N3 69 O C O c a — J O t O p W N co n \ o 0 o n a c O Co co Z LL (n O O p ccoo, c") LO a' n O ao ? N 00 Co y C) v O CO coo O Cl) N N N N C' w 0 0 O� co O O 7 c - I� m ca d (D2 p N � � � 0) 69LoIt 04 is� cri Q mM � � z W o z cs3 a �U N Cn y L J 7 O Cn Cl) O) N n V to n O C2') coo fn� o � n CA o N U O N CD L LL co N M � Ln w N N N N co 0 O O co m Cp0 0 ` y Cn n cA CJ CD W Y p n N N M dp' fA Cl> > U N N04 Q CV Cfl CA d dT CA : � 64 1 a = a a Q o� V C aN O w N O � ao a 04 LL LL M N j a 1, O M (Cp Q o `- U d 03. fioq� O co N .w �- c Z M co p p O 7 � 0 0 C X 7 N COL @ y - - m a O U) a L N ` C m a) C O J O y LL U O co L O a N O N y w LL (D Z 3 C a a V N Q m N t O co LL Co +� E U a in CV � F- a s f6 ` O ; T � } N N H o E W W c C Q C O O) c O) 0 m d Nm N C O a O d j v W N '0o (D LQ 7 '00 M C 00 00 ° N m t N O Q' YC y U N N C f�CO a O O) LL LL c .0 ca O. CA m m O C 0 O d } >'N U o � ui � 00 t0A CO CO fn N U O) j, co 4: O) c 3 M a) € c Z v, a c N m cc)o 0 0 0 c0in :° U) NY m m o � a m m daa c ELLS � C�L6t—: p aci c p m p a� a .2 p c � to m cn c V co c c C� e- M y ° tin m S co 0 d v � 0 Q o 0 0 0 c E _ ? =O Q U) w ¢ (7 w ¢ v) cncoU) (L LLLLLLU Y UU (D o m U � m ,m o U mco N X j � d00 a LL c LL N N LL � U) Q 6 € E LL L o a O) O) O V O) C) J J LL LLa a QU m amd � cn � tL Q tnm aa) < � aa) a0i m Q a� a� € c o. o �' .0049 fn Z Z I— F- fA in LL �— E- o o fn m 2 2 U' Cl) Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2008 through 2014 Section VIII Appendix Appendix A.1 - Student Enrollment Projections Appendix A.2 - CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Enrollment Projections Appendix A.3 - Student Generation Survey l Appendix A.1 - Student Enrollment Projections Auburn School District #408 Student Enrollment Projections October 2007 Introduction The projective techniques give some consideration to historical and current data as a basis for forecasting the future. In addition,the `projector' must make certain assumptions about the operant variables within the data being used. These assumptions are"judgmental"by definition. Forecasting can be defined as the extrapolation or logical extension from history to the future,or from the known to the unknown. The attached tabular data reviews the history of student enrollment, sets out some quantitative assumptions, and provides projections based on these numerical factors. The projection logic does not attempt to weigh the individual sociological,psychological, economic, and political factors that are present in any demographic analysis and projection. The logic embraces the assumptions that whatever these individual factors have been in the past are present today,and will be in the future. It further moderates the impact of singular factors by averaging data over thirteen years and six years respectively. The results provide a trend,which reflects a long(13-year)and a short (6-year)base from which to extrapolate. Two methods of estimating the number of kindergarten students have been used. The first uses the average increase or decrease over the past 13 and 6-year time frame and adds it to each succeeding year. The second derives what the average percentage Auburn kindergartners have been of the live births in King County for the past 5 years and uses this to project the subsequent four years. The degree to which the actuals deviate from the projections can only be measured after the fact. This deviation provides a point of departure to evaluate the effectiveness of the assumptions and logic being used to calculate future projections. Monitoring deviation is critical to the viability and credibility of the projections derived by these techniques. Tables Table I—Thirteen Year History of October 1 Enrollments—page 32 The data shown in this table is the baseline information used to project future enrollment. This data shows the past record of enrollment in the district on October 1 of each year. Table 2—Historical Factors Used in Pro'ec) tions-page 33 This table shows the three basic factors derived from the data in Table 1. These factors have been used in the subsequent projections. The three factors are: 1. Factor 1—Average Pupil Change Between Grade Levels This factor is sometimes referred to as the"holding power"or"cohort survival." It is a measure of the number of pupils gained or lost as they move from one grade level to the next. 2. Factor 2 -Average Pupil Change by Grade Level This factor is the average change at each grade level over the 13 or 6-year period. 3. Factor 3—Auburn School District Kindergarten Enrollment as a Function of King County Live Births. This factor calculates what percent each kindergarten class was of the King County live births in the 5 previous years. From this information has been extrapolated the kindergarten pupils expected for the next 4 years. 30 i Table 3—Proiection Models—pages 34-42 j This set of tables utilizes the above mentioned variables and generates several projections. The models are explained briefly below. ❑ Table 3.13 (pg 34)—shows a projection based on the 13-year average gain in kindergarten(Factor 2)and the 13-year average change between grade levels(Factor 1). The data is shown for the district as a whole. ❑ Table 3.6 (pg 34)—shows a projection using the same scheme as Table 3.13 except it shortens the historical to only the most recent 6 years. ❑ Table 3.13A and 3.6A(pg 35)—uses the same factors above except Factor 3 is substituted for Factor 2. The kindergarten rates are derived from the King County live births instead of the average gain. ❑ Tables 3E.13, 3E.6, 3E.13A, 3E.6A(pg 36)—breaks out the K-5 grades from the district projection. Summary level data is provided for percentage gain and pupil gain by grade articulation. ❑ Tables 3MS.13, 3MS.6,3MS.13A, 3MS.6A(pg 37)—breaks out the 6-8 grades from the district projection. Summary level data is provided for percentage gain and pupil gain by grade articulation. ❑ Tables 3SH.13, 3SH.6, 3SH.13A, 3SH.6A(pg 38)—breaks out the 9-12 grades from the district projection. Summary level data is provided for percentage gain and pupil gain by grade articulation. ❑ Table 4(pg 39)—Collects the four projection models by grade group for ease of comparison. ❑ Table 5 (pgs 40-42)—shows how well each projection model performed when compared with actual enrollments. Data is provided in both number and percent formats for the past 13 years. Summary Historically,average gain in students over the past 6 years is 1.32%annually that equates to 183 students. Over the past 13 years the average gain is 1.55%and equates to 204 students annually. Using the cohort survival models that data below is a summary of the range of variation between the four models. This data can be used for planning for future needs of the district. The models show changes in the next six years: ■ Elementary level shows increase ranging from 325 to 725. (page 36) ■ Middle School level shows increase ranging from 211 to 362. (page 37) ■ High School level shows decreases ranging from-169 to-308. (page 38) The models show these changes looking forward thirteen years: ■ Elementary level shows increase ranging from 462 to 1489. (page 36) ■ Middle School level shows increase ranging from 371 to 800. (page 37) ■ High School level ranges from-3 to gain of 413. (page 38) This data does not factor new developments that are currently under construction or in the planning stages. Projected enrollment data with new developments is found in Appendix A.2. Development data is combined with enrollment projections from this report. 31 1 O p 0 co LO m 1- co I- h M II- w N M M o o O N M O M O r- O M q co m M to 1- O to M M 0 to 0 N ao N N t v d' to M m N N o aP m M O m 0 0 0 0 0 M M N � o cl m C) (-O - M - - M co M tMC) M 0 �-- �- �- 1� t- N N r' M O 'T N N O N � o to Cl) LO N O co co m C co N O O Cl) O N O O O M M cl M N N Cl) O 0 0 co to N 00 N N CO � Cl) In CD M N f'7 0 M d Q p to Cl) M O M (wO O N M :' w ONo w co m to o a^o m N M ° ccoo ccoo M to 0. LO N co N O Cl) O O O - cM CO - 0 0 N co co co m M m 1�iAAA O CO 0 p .- �- �- r C) N N to O N d' to M N c) to M N o Co T Z Oi m CD O N - O LO N N CO (o co tLo co co co N O A co N M Ito If F co Co p ip � co O 0 o m M M m � v F 00 in o M O co c j M 00 cA M N M a M V N O 4 W N N M (O � Co •- N M M _O N O to '� N t N M V LO h N M M (O im O M LO 7 (p to h co M lA Co N qo to M O Cl) co N N j O O N O N O N a N N N Ul) ttoo N co tmC) M N M � M�- F .-- CV 7 IL o a oi It � N Zp to Cl Cl) N N to _ mV 00 MNnM N N b N N to d O ( LO v Goo W NNNO .— O O NN N a n co 00 co m O to O p p Q Q N to to N "T LO M N (h d' M J J 0 p co 00 m co h 00 00 to M O O CO c (O OR to 10 to M N Cl) CO (o M (O 00 CM Cl) Z O N N N O O O O � O O Cl) M N M N T O�0 1 M 0) OOD O O N CV O mV O N r N K) cc N to Co M N V' M m lw M a LO e � � o W OiCN O M n m ^ O N In co V C CO N M CD t� M CCn 00 00 O AID p O O O O N O O Co n 00 00 co m m M m N M O Q O M M m F m M �- (o O (0 U m N LO Co N v to N e- Cl) d M yO LO (D o d V C p) mO 0 N MO lLO 0 C) lA M tlNl CO mW Of m N O0n O LO M O 00 I-- Goo mM N N m co co Go O m N OO m d Cl)M ; N to (o Cl) LOn N 0QQ O U) E O M OG) N O ^ OODD (NO M M co O O n m tt) n C n M M N 00 N 0 0 to C' 00 C O co m O p m m M M m O m N M - U co CID O � O m Co co O N C. J W M �- l0 - N LO CO M e} to N - M et Cl) 0 7 0 o a m to O tC) Co M M N 0 o M 4 Ol O M (O n to co m O Cl) N m (� Q m I� (`') co 00 to It to O N d' N Cp CO r N w Co N co C. 0 co ZO m O p m m m m m M - O O CO C-4 N Cl) Q Q O m N CIO Cl)p v CD to N - M � NN m y M M O O 2 C h N NN M g CD N coN It E co M - LO M t OOO O 1� N O MI- 1- M cot` OON m m m M M b CO Cl) N to (0 N F t) N N Cl) N"0mnmO 1 N 0 O } CN N r- W M O eF M M � t` O M tD ^ m N LO O 1- CO ttf M N tto N to 't to n N CM N CO CO to Co N D; C N M M M m m m M M OD M 00 ^ N C 'C m co f` CO m n O � CIO N N to O N It (O N N M N ~ 0 c � W � J 0 C.9 J C U' J Q LU N to Co Cl) to Co co co M N eN" CO Q p N M v to (o r` co M N F- (�i — m p ' ¢� Y � o m` YYYY mr` r` mo �- aa (A 7C tD O 0 O a 0 r wo = � � t 1 o ~ J S. Q > C9 Q m d' U Ll.l o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o N N N N w Q o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 of o 0 0 0 0 0 o O O to DI 0 Cl) N � O O CO 0 N It O (O CD Co O Oo O O r M M M M 0 � CC) It O O ~ J M O 0 M O O O N d' n r w N O w O O O O O M O N 0 OD �} h CO Z w 0 1` W O d; N Go d' O h 0o N Cl) Co M O N M 00 CO o) 0 0) 00 N t- r r p N CV O 0) w Y 2 w M M v v � 'r v ' v � v 4 v v t v v v M M M v M M M M v v v v v v Q' a Q' Q' H ►- Z J H $ Z J D V 0 O N 0) O Co W � c c c E 2 N -iII <W < Qaa` aa c' 0 ` w v v v v Z, C W m 0 Z w J E *.- Z J O O tNn `r.D M 0 0 000 N rD 0 N N N 0 - t.- u0) O N M N u CMO I- Lo e Oe}} N It O N N 0 V 01 eaet� N N E cc 0 w Y Z CO O to CO w O w w I-- N 0 I- 0 m w 0 0 O) O O O 0) 0o 00 m 0o O O 0o 0) O C) O) W W Q O. N Z 0 w * O O 0 O N to O O) w "t I-- O w w 0 O 0 1- O M N It N 0 w M M O) _M h N M O � O N to It N w Cn w 2 0 N M h N w h O g 0 0 st N N O O N 0 O r 1- t.- N N N h N r M q d* u) N Cn ZO Q U 0 �j t CO O d' O CO M O O N O N CO 00 tq 00 00 O O CM r O tO r 0 CO O O M O CO N h n � C. C 0 M J t, CM M C7 M 4 eP 0 CO I- w OO OO Oj Oj r V CO V O N V N N N N N N N N C') 0 Z Z Q m r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 m V Y Y c J t W ~ U. 0 d' J I,- 00 M O N M d 0 O N W M O N M et O Co n M O C. N M et O CO t.- M O O r N rn U OQIiOCCCwmOococo000000coa� rnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrn0000000000rr - m Q Z w O CO ti co O O N M tf CG h co O r C� M a to CO a0 W O a M d' O CO n 0D O O } w p- n n w 0 OD w m 00 w w 0 O m m O to O) O O O m O O O O O O O O O O r y a o 1= J Z to U O O M M CO M_ V N Op 0 0 0 0 O M r O 0 O M M O O c0 CO W pp0pp0 n O6 Z to O LL C.j to In O 000 O ll� COO N M tOA CO COO O U O COO C00 M CMM N M V N N 7 CMo O O W C U < r m CO O el' d' el' V In W) 66 CO CO CO CO CO I-- (- 00 00 I- CO C- I� OD h I-- f- I. I� f- I� f- I� I. 00 .L., GJ U J Z W p- -q co O O O CA O r N M Cl) O Cl) n O O N 00 r O O <t 00 O N O V I to (o N N OD CO Cl O V O 7 CO O O N to m O F- co 00 � co M Cl N O r- O CO � CO 0 a/ 0 �- O m r 0 p) O r tZ 0 0 N � O cl CO r M N C 0 0 r M 00 O 0 M V Oo ( O O O O N r .- m M O O r r r N N N M M to V n O M �t 0 V V d' V q* d' 't 0 0 CO Z 0 N m r r O Co 00 O O O r r r r r r r r r r r r .- r r r t- r r r r r r r r r r r .�. W Q r N Z J Cn Co 0 O m M 0 N CO V O O r M � 00 r M t 0 M M O O M O M 0 N n � 00 M N O M U Q W 2 N M to 3e} Cfl 00 M N O O M f` n O O M r- 9 M Co M N O � Iq 0 0 � CO M O 2 �t W > H O � n V tf) � CO O Co 00 r 00 O O n O) 00 O O h � O M O O O CO N O qt r- 00 � O CO N Q O J O 0 M M CM M M i u) CO O h w 6 00 O O N O w N O N N to r r N N N N CV CV 4 7 m r r r r r e- r r r a- r r r r r r r N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C0 N O N M et O O � M M O N M V O 1` 00 O O N M et O Wn 0 O O N M � O CO U M Q < Q r h r- P- I-- N h I- I-- N 0 00 w w w w Oo 0o 00 0 W O O m mO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O m 0 T m m O O O O O mto O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O V LL U �Z } r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r a- r r r a- r r r r r N N N N N N N O O C. O O O O pp O O O O 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O CS 0 00 d. CO ":t N It O a N 0 O N O It a N N O CO d: 00 N 't N et 00 0D 00 (� N 0) Cl) M It 00 O r r (1) CV CO CD 0 00 0) r r W M 0i t` r 6 (c tri (C N y O r N N M N r N N 4� N d' n +�- > N r r r r N N 00 CD N N w M `r u N 0 r N w r y Z cn (a $ J U) m c m o 3 m m °QD a_') m 2 m 2� Q a LL 0 Q Y r N M et O CO t- 00 0) O `- N QC f.. w r N M V 0 coO coOD 0) r 0 0 '6 w O m } 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U) iC a) m } 0) Nd 0 Y r N M V O 0 0 CA r p C 0 N Co C ,O (A CD CD l71 EL «t+ V L C c U o U t a °1 > 0. N d CD) N N d 0) N 0 pp p O N pp O O O N f• C] N O E N - to N O n O M N M O O N O O O Cp 0) tC) to lf) N O O <- W N N V N N O O r N M CA 0D h 0 d, 0 0 0 p N y CO O f� d' 0 r q* O 00 4 th CS) > .0.. N (`') M CV N O CV w n M N M O 6 > O U N j w O r r r r a- r r N t- 0 x O CoO of N w r r r N M v ct� N U Q co J < r 0 O Q < Y O m N N w Ofm N O J _ 0 N co N r W r N co a O CO I- 0D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0) p_ N W Y �- N M It O co r co o) Or N O Obi X LL M D O O O O O O O O O O r t9 0 0 LL Cl) CO O N M t to CO I.- CO M r r LL E y r LL ti o N O W N m M V co W f- tO O M V m o M V m V O N W m r O r o O N M m m r N C') It to W W 00 00 O co 00 N O N M t-- W f` m O O m O O O u> m N m a N O O R. r r r r r r V cM N E N V a' p N N N N N M CO N N W V M N M a - - - - - r r r r r r r p a N r r r r r r r r r r r r r r N 1� M O W W W O to M V r ti O O r- n o . p V co co N N V ti O M N IM N V o C tO O ar-N M to M r N M V tO W W W 00 N Cl) �. O t(! N to W w w ti OD w t- M I- NO CO m c ow 83 O O o r r r r r V M N r CO W O� W MN N N N N N N N N N tO � N W M n N a - r r r r r r r r r r r r r 0 a r r r r r r r r r r r r ^ N L O '� m N tO N th w O w �t to 1� O �j o M O co f- M w d 'd tO 6) N 1n d' v N_ to o 0 O �' M w m O r M V u> to lf) I,- I� M N M p O r O M M M 4 CO CO M co �C) ^ N O 0 a' co O O O r - r r r n2 N O tO OD a' Op N N N N N N N r N Cp 1f) N a r r r r r r r r c a r r r r N M W m N m V OD t• CO to O M O M M _O 00 m to O W W [O r ehe}}• tp t} N M o Z N O O O O N M - to � m N ^ ^ - N N N N N N N N tO VV N N n ti oa r r r r r r r r r r r C7 a r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r N W M ti to m co O r to M et N 1- W M V j o n o r W N w OD O M W m w V 1+ a0 0 O r N t` M O r N M V to V M Co to O �" W O m O O N M N N N h tD h o M o O O O r r r r r r V M N r C� V a' Cp r N r N N N N N N M N N O N lix a r r r r r r r - r r r r r r C) a r r r r r r r r r r r r r - r N a Z O W N 1- w m O N m o v w N N * OD W a' to O O O CDr r r r M M r r 0 V COp W N r r r r N N N -* M N N m d; N C a r r r r r r r r r r r r r r O a r r r r r r r r r r r - N CJ Q m N m V to o t-- W M m m NC) M t-o Or trO r trO teO- ^O 'tO f` h mONMa M M LOm Cl) cc a O O OrrO N Nr > m a r r r r r r r r r r 'Tr r r NZ N p� ILU a a. Q W m CO N in V o V M to M 00 o ' V 000 N ti M M to W W M W 1� V co o r r W 1h M O r N to O W M V t� co W O O r O V -ItV tf) t, f.- N 0 M h- M O n t• m Q a - a 0 0 0 r � � 0 � •M-- eM- N O V W O a M r r r - r r r - - - -- - � W � Cl)- r r r r r � a r r r y M cl) N W M I'+ 00 N W V to m m r t� o M M ti W of m to to to W N m m co M N o F' O W t W m r W m W O M W 0 O N O 00 N N N M W r CM r W M a a r` CO M a CV o r r r r r r r r V M r r I- W a r r r r r r r r r r O r a r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r N m N O a lO V O O M I., co N W o M N m p to r t+ W to - W N W tO W N o Q O a W o 00 m to 0 to r to m a 0 to N O O O r r O O N O m aaD W oa000000rva o � m IX rr O m W w w O O to N N t- M o M r N t+ N W N O P- r r W 0 W to COV p N o to o O r pp M M W r M m W M O m w m to O = N M �p p et pppp O 'I N N a' O O O CS O O O O r r M N r O r a' O O O o 0 CD r 0 r M C7 r O W N a r - - - - - r r r r r r C7 a r - - - - - r r r r r r O r Im a M W M M r W to V N W W P- N OD ' N V m N t- O to m op m r M W � o m O o to W N to N = O M W tO W W n W O co t+ W M W W r 03 m �p N O r ^ Cn w a) O O O O O CS r O M N r r V c0 (n w M o 0 0 0 0 0 r r O M N r N o a i Q Z a O a r r r r r r r r r r r r r r 0 Z z,a O r r r r r r r r r r r r r r 0 _ U � W M m M W t� r V 0 ao N M N N n W = M m V tO m N r to W w W - a' " Vo 2 IO O O O MhmNW M coW F.- W O Q r to O V N m mrIZ 3 A r OmaW O O O O O O Cl) cli N O N w 0 0 0 O O OOOOO MNrm N w } p cr NOrrrr r r r rr O ar a >- VC J C C H C J C C O Q W m ti W n r M I� w N M m c0 N V O Q m m 1- W 1�- 1- M n OD N Cl) m N N a 'O a W W ti to h pp W M M W tO W W 0 C� --pp ' O W to t` to ti O to Cl) Cl) W tO W W O O N U O N O N O O O O O M M M Q n � y U O N O N 0 0 0 0 0 - - - N - �O a o m Q r r r r r a� a 0 Co a r r r r r a a' w W m a uw w m m J m 0 0 � a -10 0 J a w Fa- Cl) ga 0 '- N M V to W t- co m O � C F- H C i � � �"' N M V tO W r- OD m Or � r � O O Y 0 co 1- U F- t L O a 0 O N Cd0 �O�}} d O N l!i a- 0) f0 d N d M N r d co N r r r r N r r r O O O ttoo N 1* tile) 0000 O N d d O w N N N O tD n d 0 r- •d-- v r - d 0 CN- LO It eN- N N r '- r �+ 0' It NNn 'O M Cl) M 0) CV O 00 O 00 r V a r 0 r � � � r a' 00 N O N Oa r a r r r r M O Cl) Cl) O Cl) O Cl) M � r N N N CD d N Z O d N O Ih N d O D) tD rb o M N N O a n r r r d M N r � n r r r d N N a r r r r r r a r r r r r r r F- W 00 m M N h w M d r o r M to d rn O O O r 0 M O O r I- In CD O N h CO a tp r O �- •- M N r r r r M N r N a r r r r r a- re- LaL z ' O eN- tb O O d0 N CA d O M M ton 0 CO OtOO O M W a to r 00 0 r .M- r r r w c a r r r r i- r r a J J 0 M U f� O ti h O r M O O C M O m N O w w fl- m O tt) to O W n w t` m W O co M t[> O r' O m M N w V I-- d to O Z d C) C) C) O - O P N N r r r r a r r r r r r r r r W Z M d O) O O to d O d M to M 7 d to of o to O o M CO h d W O r' f- to 1- to N W O (D M d I-- O r m O m O f, N tf) M f- M O [� a' - O O O O r O r m m N o a ty O O O r r r r M N r a i- r r r r r r a r r r r r r r- r N M Cl)0 — O O tD 00 N O to W O r r- M N d r, O to to w N O O co M CD Cl) to d r to CD Cl Cl) co O O P- d 0 h to r M r O N d d V N O O O O O O O d M r w N C-, O O O EL r r r e- a- r e- c- r r r a r r r r ra-- OC Q C N o w d to d 0 d O M N w N M o M N N r d CD r- to N w N w In O o r N M M O to O to r r 0 o n d 00 O M d d r O N O d N co O M M J r O 0 o o o 0 0 a r mt N r- o 00 N a r 0 0 0 0 r CDr O r It r O � d o a r r r r r r r r r r r r e- r O r a - r r r r r r r r r r r r r � N O O 7 h O r M o O O to r N N 1, ti c M O N N CD M O h r to O r N O a 0 cn 0 0 0 0 0 0 r r Cl) N r O r N O O O O O r O r �- M M r O Cl) Z r r r - r r r r r r r O V �o a e- r- r r r �- r r r r 0 y 2 y md 0 CO M M 00 to d N 0 W ti N O @ M O O O) N h 0 to W O O r M to O) c Z d O) O O O O O O p O M N a tOD O co Y 0 0 0 a a r- - O t`O') co N - N 4 d cp Q O o� O r r r '- '- r r r r r r r O O 0 a r r e- r r r - C, C, v UU) p o m 5 O v tto O m r, 6i N w m 0 N w M a N ' @ porn to W N M 00 a0 Oo d "T O N o a W O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M N N N OD O O O O O O O O O M N N M N M � a 0 - r r r r r r e- r r r O �„ a s r r r r a- r r r r r e- a- � � a Vm J C C C J C C O ¢ O OD O to O t` ti O I- I- M r-- 00 N M IO c0 V O ¢ OO co 0 0 0 I- I-- M I- I- co I` 00 N M I t0 m R a r to 1� Cl to M M co N tD a v to l� pp to Cl) co tD to to U' C7 I— 01 - r, O O O O O O O O O M C) M N M F- 0) - 1� O O O O O O O O O M M M N (n (� O O O r O r r r r r r r r r d O a T y V p O O r O r r r r r r r r r d' O a m ¢ C 7 a m ¢ C 7 0) IL � a w cn U) lk J M o < w a - ¢ o Q a m ar g Y r N M d to CD 1� OD O Or P 04 N ¢ CM Q r N Co d to co r-, co o M LLCCO O O Y O a c n o N > CM >.00 p c} d• r (a N r tD la toO p >.Cl) >.cli ^ Tr TN (p`(co 0�� 00 �to�M O t� h--no Oo OO co(O N p NN�N M (0 0 d' O O N r r r r co O N r r r t- N IL N 1� O OD COO O P O (0r (oN N N ° M O O Q N(M 0o 0) rN M 000p N IA Ol0:0 00 N p ON ON Q 01 OOrr r (0 (v O) NNN-4 N O O p p N r r co r I.- a r L to O m N U)N h O r U) I- c)OD't0 cc)0) Or m tO(9 MMM7O`p OO (AMN Op NN�N N O p0 r r r r W O r r r r I- y O NO) aLe) OD cA ° 0 mWO:O O M ° 00 00 Z rN 00 OD Or N d•Op r rr NN V O O O O OO r'•• r CO • N n NN�� N M r- r (o rr rl� a C- a. H W O)O O r (n CO ° h r(O N 00 00 d ° M n Go h O �"' I-0o O r N N p r" O p O O N O) O) O `- N O (O CD •- �cl)N (G �2 ;2 N r O � (O � (a rr r t0 r � r d •- dr a (O (A CO n OD N CO ° 0 CO 00 Cl)T _O M ° c0 N 1, to :h O Z r h 00 0 0 N 00 p r 00 h 00 70 00 O O r ao M W N O O 0 -•• �M N to r .- .-� N O o r r fL a r J Q MO NO) d•O 0 h ° OOb r c0 ° MIA f�0 t- O 0)N O O I- 0)0 r O O p r' C14 c0 to co- 0 I- p O 0)r, 0 O O m M M OOOr r V N r O) 0 x 4 00 O x r0 r O) Z r r rr r 0 rrrr r 0 ' r a r r iL r� O) lul a Z V' p 0 N O I. ° v O N I-n M r- ° M 0)COO to '� d cn 00.- 00 W r (D P 01 O r to O p r V' 'q 'q O I-- CO0) O ti tor. (O r 00 co 3) O Q a'M 000�- r vcoN `M r rr r O0 O cr 00' O Q' 000 r rrrr r (O� r - e-- c- (0 ar rrr rrr N Cl) (0 M t-:0N cO ° P DD� 0)O to I-- M p W O b N M N t-0 (A f" (0 r co p d• N N N:o (n LO r W M 0 8 r F- (O U.)a 0 0 0 0 r 0 r a r r t, a 0 0 0 a O r 0 0 r Vr� ar r a r H N O O 7 V' ° O(Orr. (A t0 ° M co 00 ee}}O V ° Nr-i .- (O r` O ° 0 (o h- 00 0) O f`O r O r r- p 0 ('� N M M 77 O (O M d'r- p r9 J 0000 O Cl)0)LO r r r� O (O N 0000 O N r O O�••' O O(0 rrrr r OC r r rr r (0 rrr'- r (fl r rrrr r (0r O `- 0)CO 00 O n ° N I� O >D 00 ° r O N N:0 O t+ ° (A c0 aD:h O O 0)co 0)O 0 00 O r N r 00?o CO O r M N O)O O t+ O 0000 O MLc) O 0000 r (A O 0000 O NO)� O OOOo r Nrn (n r rrrr r co e.. r rrrr r rrrr r (0� � � r rrrr r (o �. _ 0 (OMMr 00 �t ° �O a0)Nn. O Cl) ° m O co MMr 00 N ° (a O 0)O Nf� 0 r ° m r O CO N O N N O h c0 M:O (0 M (p r O(0 N O N cv) a) r O O M' tD O CO O) 0000 O N W 0000 O M p M W 0000 ) r >- ( O N •c•) L 0 rrrr r (p O r �- e-e- r (0 r O rrr; r 0 0 O rrrr r CO 0) M(0 I`- 7 p ° Z= p LO O h ° m p M(o n� d p ° (ra 0) (A W N r O N ° to O` to O M r I- n O I.. C ((7 O'd N 0) M c(•) a' (A O M e- t` N r M �' Id)O 8 N 0) ti p N a0 00 00 O CS7 M F- (a 00 0000 O N p 0 0000 O r r F+ O0 OO O;J O r cy O rrrr r C00 W} O rrrr r c0 Lt, O rrrr r (p0 w .0 O rrrr r 0 LU c0 L C C (_ c L C oaco (a ca0 o co m'm(t ogc0 (a 0 � o'' co mCD mM o Y aro(� p�p�g 1 oa) p 0) 00000 O Q . � O 00Q 'am a a a a a Uj m mw p w � � w w pO O O J J rNM n rNMh l) co ay0Ja L to to coM W Q MOD Y O Y o 0 a ca �P TO TCA T00 ti CDn M O cM m Cl) co O_ N O H P P m P N N (^wry= N a) P T T P CD O N O Cl) O N O co 0 0 _ O N 7 L~o COO COO• Oo\O p O N O M m m N Co O N O N d N tP- P M p `� a N M N N M to a N a. O a N 7 O c) U 00 0 O '�t ti O N n O O CZ, Co N 4 Lo Co O 00 p O N 00 1-- 00 '1 ee}} Cn O N O P V NIX a' 0) N N N 00 N a �- r P Cl) p a r M a P a P P L M O o r 00 0) o ") (MCo O N I� M M 7 0 M M 0 0 O P d• Ln � � 00 p Q P c0 Lc) 0 00 Co U) O In N O o 00 V x OD P P N P (t 00 N N N ^ a' 00 et Cn w 00 P N P O a P P r M C) a P M P a P P a P y co H co Co G) 00 Co V co o � O O M M w o M Op P N N Cn o n M P P CS N p Q P * eF V M ' Lc) P N I� M O P O CD Co M N M O 0 a P O a n N N N C^n O a n P M �? CO a M Or o L P P P r W 0)' o 0 n M V N o M CD M N M 00 0 7 ^ M - M O O P M et Co N N O p O P M N N N r` O Q •" O P O r C U7 O P COO o o � CC) a' Cp P P N P OfCp N P N b h Co tt? X 0 O P P M N a' Cp P P et r- N a P P r P a P P M P a P P P M lz O a P P P P M y. a ZM CO O 00 a) o M O P Lo 00 v o M co co 00 00 o M CO CD O w I-. o O r M d' d' P_` - d O P O O N It ti O P O 0 v M O N O P Cn d' O m N O w � P C'`,Y�7 CU CO � In N N- r M n O x In O 0 M O M W In - T N M Q M a P a r N CL P O a P O o M O I- OD O o M O M O � ti o � O I� 00 P In � M C!) 00 CO I� N o aI O r N M 0 CC) M ^ Q O ao et N h 00 O f� M O O w C,:y O r N 00 -It to O Z DPP OOM) v, �} ad PP Pln � o a � OP OM 0 Q' � P � � M PM r. P P M P P P cM o a P O W I- Z M _� t O 00 o M Lo co co 0) o M v cp O d' co o M Cn Co Oo O) o � o) NC) M ctoo• CCOO � `MPr � � � rn � c� � o o Cl)M m � OPr � Inca v � a P N a P chi N a P P ao ch P = r�i 00 rn N a lV (n o M M O d' O et ") Cl) O co N M \ '� CO to V cn V ' M M Cn Co N M O P Cfl o CO N O O O P P M P O N = O o CA Co N O Cn O r' P M P CO N '" (� a O CN co a s ar- M o �.. a 0 0 0 CN•) O a N r Cc) v NCJ 7aN NoO CO N o O 4O pp N °O _ OM N O \ x - N00ON N ems M ;0 Na a ' rPP M Oa O M r O o Cn 't o M O n o ' P o 0 Co d' N M Q r Oo0 N M M N M U Q et O r O N M Q 00 N M 2C� N M O `- 'T O CA r N d^ O O P N O M (L O O c) CV C� O d' O O P N O M r X O O r- P M N n Z a P P P M r a P P P P M N a r r P M P 0 a P P P P M N N Z Z Z = O Q 0 OM O O� P ao MP O F- Cn N M0Co 0) O NM O Cn It N - =CO M OM Cn O CD_ O W s P ao wXOp M 00 - oo } �} o- � Oap Cl) aO c"i n co a C�O pn a 0- a ,�� � 01) y Q co0 � rnN 8 � MN 0 02 (M 00 F, oa) W) Q � O � rnN cCooa)_ c°ocy Q � Oprn °p � rn � o Q m CL 00 0 o cD Op O 0) aX Oo 0 0 o P P o O a' 00 0 0 o CO CO O ao 0 0 o r p a O P �- P M N V } a 0 P r r M to U .Ct„ a O P P P M N U rt, a o P P P M M C J C C U) C J C C W m J C C m J C C w o d ao m' m w o d o w o co 'm w o 0o m m J 'O D O Co M 0) O O J 'O O - O Cn M o _O O J �p _ o In Cl) O O O J -o Z) 0 0 Co Cl) M O O D a) F- C� 0 0 0 0 D y �- h 0 0 0 0 a Nizz C] O P P COC a _O V O P P M D 'O. U O_ L) 0 0 0 0 O Q Q N F- O O O O M G - _� 0) O P P o O _ � CL md 0)) iL � md a � md a4) a. � md ma- 0 0 `- d F � F M w O . w O m w O - O -1 `� O F- a J � 0 � J r 0 a J O 0 a cn and Co N co co Q co 00 co Q CD N co co Q !n CO C, co X F- M CD F' M O CO F' M O CO a 0 ` N N cc `" T M T M T tO T O M M d M (ry r r N 00 N p) N w co CD w CO fD O M r I� o M O M o d w N d o M r In r m (0 o O N w co m In M O N O m (n m M m M O N (O d b d O N CO O N w N 1� C) (O a N d M N � Cm r d C.4 (O d M N � � h a N d N � (N M r �' O d N N (V M r r rr r r O a N r r r M Q p r- O O d o O M N M N O o O 00 NONIn w w w CD w O N w I� M I- w h w N N o CO w N a m - - - - (f) (p a a7 .0- M N N a p� M N O (+) a p) d N N LO CO (r� r r r r r r OM p d (O P O f� o M O w d d N_ to o M M N w (- O (n o "9 m M O d _N m o 0 O �' In r- � M M f� O r w to d w to O r N N 1-- M LO F. m O O CO CO to O w Cp d Cl) N V (N m (n W 00 w - M N � to c0 W CD * M N � G M r w P � M N N dr rr O ar r (L rr o LLr r o y w O M O M (O o M co I- (O N m o � w O M O m w o w N w d N d o Z O r (n 1� N d w F O r d Cl) N cn Cl) �t O r 0 I-. N d M M r O r w M cn N m m IX t- It M N 00 d' (n d N N r n d M N r f� C) ^ It d N N M m d o a r r r N r CLr r r r CV r (L r r r r In O W -'f I- w M d m o M n O) in h In o M ^ r- w M d m o M ^ O cn I- w o O O '' d M O O (n w O r N s- t� R M p O r d M O O w 00 O �"' N h (O h M p W w d (pn O Cl) d (O LO M N w r w a (p d M N CD O M d tU N fM N w r w N r r r r r r r IL M w O (7) M m M w w w m _M w o M (O O O M m r "� w w w O M CO o Z O r O) N m d (O I'. 'ITw w w N O '"' n O r m N m 't w h -,tO w w w N W OfN M M r r O d N (f') It Cl) N N N Cl) r I M M r r O d N I� d M N N N M r d r r r to C a r r r r r (n O (L r r r r (n C d r r r r (n O J C nLO d (n o cnm00 0m m0) �iL R LO n Ora) CDLoi rnco o) w M O r O w M w 00 In M O r I- d (O m w m 00 O r C) 00 Cl) (y d N N r O d ^ d M N r N N r d' d N N r C. d, � � d N r N N r N Z d r r r r In r p_ r �- r r (n N r a r r r r (n r., a r r r r r (O N r p) W a Z M d M (n M _N _ M a M (O t-- d o M d M (n M N -7 'a M w (- d o O r w M 't h W O r M f- M O to (O O r 0M d (- r w O r M h M cm, LO CO W a (h M M Na 0 0 Q' (+� d M NCO (+� a' (h M M N O c) 0 Q' cy d M N w M C o- r r r (n o CL r r � (c> o CL r r r (n o o- H U M r m m r I- u-) o M M m m to M h o M � m m I, v) o M M m m (O M f� o H O oM (o o (On Orcoln 'r d r o (n O oMCO o w � O (o (Od dr ol() d W N M r r 0 N ^ N d M r M '' W N It Cl) r r 0 U) n N d M r M a r r r r In r a r r r In CV r a r r r r r to r a r r r cr- (n N r M N M h CO N co o M N w (n w N o M G M I- w N w o M N N (o to w N o G O � (nm (-- M F- w O (nww a) LO O — r (nm nM r` w O � cn (Ow mo d � J a' r d N O m (n a r d N C) r d N r O m (n r d N r 6 0 A Oa r r r r d r a r r r w N r d r r d r a r r w N r M r N N � N * M r w O r � �_ M r N N h N ° M r w 0 P, �_ (� Orc� mm In w d � Orcod ww o Z.Orcnmco I.- w d � Or (ood OD co o O M N r O w N r O M M r O w Of O O r CO N r O w N O r. v (L r r r r d v a r r r r d Ci d r r r r r d v Z y = N _ \ _ m Or w w f� N M o M m M (n w o M O (o w Ih N Cl) %� (p (a O O CY) w N O w w w w � (h j, O m co N O w v p O m (n w w f� M p N a M N r r m O r m W M N N m N r m M d' W M N r r m O r CO) '!' O) M N r N m N r Z 0. p r r r r d vi Z a, O vj Z r a O r r r r d M Z t0 a O r r r r d (,.) a 0 O p O va O 06 H = o H y o ~ d o ~ m o WM N Cl) N N m W = M p d d I- O w W 07 M p N Cl) N N m W t4 M O d d' � O w (`00 Mwn wN orna„ O (Odd r (n � m � � 0 M (O1� wN m � -� O (n LO rLO O } w Cl) N N N w r O M w M N N M r O Q' w M N N N In r O Q' w M N N M r, 0 a C) r r r r In v — 0 } a O r r r r (n Cl) � 0 � a O r r r r (p 0 � a O r r r r (p a V a w a m a m = C J C C = C J C C = C J C C = C J C C _O ''pCp a w f� w N Cl) 0 O C a w h w N M O O 0 a w h w N M 0 _O C Q w P w N CO O D 03 = N F" O M (0 M N M O O = N F- O M M (w') N M � O = N h O M (� M N M O O = � F^ � cMM to U) to cli M cl) N Cv) O O co V o r r r r w o a m V o r r r r (n c a m V o r r r r In D a � U V O r r r r )n o a v) ma Ca (nma `mn' (nma `ma' coma ma' ►- r = rr ~F- d ( r W V W W W 0) O W a. W m J O J J o a m = o04 m o N CN N o04 M � m r 04 m N � w w o) X(/) co o C a CN It `- I N N (r) (V LO >' O T ('J �- � Ln �^ p0) CDOr M N M N M M CO M V ",. Cl) o N l0 O N O (0 N C6 (A 6�7 c0 (0 O n j,N O j� 0 >1 c0 T O CO O CO T (V — O O Cl) CO coN Cl) O M. �. ? toN 0) O N M M O N (00 (00 co O N M On) O N n M 0 n O N 00 N a' O O p LO M a' O iF CO a' O M fl- N I a O a N a N Lo co a N CO M a N LO LO LO LO a N ti M O LO C M O CA O o N O tt O 0 P- - O O N M 04 O O N U) W O O (0 b n Oa MaO0 ( M OMM OM � N `c) O CD na 0)) N a � l! a a l �L.. d a LO 0 0 � Mrn 0 � � N O � - coo O r) m * U) ) O � Nr O .- a a0 a OD N U) O a a Ln CO a M a LO LO u) a 0000 Lo CO 1 N aorno o � Ln n 000) M co Lo oorncoet -3 o U) Z O Z N � O N O (M M r- M O ao LO M O O — n m a ti Lo co F- W M I- LO O M h M r- O o m N -1 r- O LO 0) LO M 1� V 00 O O N co O o M O N n — (n O rn LA 't O LO a 00 � a 0L COO a 0 M co a � LLO LO to V) a � 0 (NO � a IL M ( N N '� CO Cl) M CO O) v 00 � M O co co W a O a a) O N M O O CO C N CO o O a a a Ln a O cn M CM7 d M LOO LO LOO LNO a M 0 g J O M � O) M M � 00 N M LO Lo I� Lo N M V) Ln O Lo O) � N n O N_ O CO LO O LO N O COe}} O o O 00 W O Z a v O � a Lon a � c)) M MM a � LOOLf) LLnLN a � a � Ill a Z M CO U) M N M o W o 0) M N r N M 000 W O o O LO (o O o LO O Ln O Lc) N O d aM � � aM ) aMm � a_ a. a a c) Ln H O `' N0oo O CS PCO NCMD N co Cl)CO p — Ln - Ln — 0 � 0or0) (, a' N O O a a � Lqr co a NP` CO MCO a cNCD LO LOI) LO a � CO LO Of y M CV O O N N M N LO n 0) M 't CO O c) c) V � 00N co N M � CO N M O_ C O O A Z� O v CO � CO O M O Cl) CD a' 0 0 0 0 a � M Ln N M a N CMy N M a 0) O a) O a �- LO 0) It P 0 a a Ln LO Lc) Ln a M Cl) Cl) a �- ItLo v V) CO M M p to N h N N M r M O t- O O � oL� O M Mo O � Lf) M LOM O co co co 00 O (1) Lo V a 0 0 0 a O m It N M a O N co N M a' O co co 00 00 a 0 a .- � � a � LnLC) LnLO a � MM MM a - * V vv a � � CO Z O Q (A aa M O 0 O Cl) 0 a CC) 0)m0 O ` O O O ' LO 0) c. 0 CO n 00 MMU) N N N N N a) 0)0 Ln LO LO a O CO M M Cl) a O V V a 7 a Cl d � 0 a 0 °) v °) o Cl) o M "� 0) o Cn rn W) ') 0) LA LO rn LO rn n I, N N U O � M p O Q o N 00 N O O n O h O O Q N LO N LO O O o Co eM� N Z a a 0 0 •-- CA LO a 0 LO LO l() LO a O M CO M CM a 0 Ln LO LO Ln a 0 'ct H W ° w a`S a 0 O CO CO O Q OO co co CO CO a 00 f` t- t` n Q � 0 0 0 0 (n Q O L00) u0) 0)) 0) Ur Z N O O W 0) �_.. iz a-- It ems- I 0) O) O CA N N N N N J L() LO LO LO O O O O O LO 0 F- N O O O O H N M M M M Q F- � a' �- U O U O Ln LO LO LO U O co M co M (� O LO LO LO LO amaa °aa It xa oa Q c� CD CD F- w w w w U w mvw ° a ° a 0 ° M E- z co (o a C9 (R (q a (D co vi co ai a c9 = z = _ T 0 � (o m SE ww ww C� uiw Li C� � � � � c� En (n (n (1) ° riri riM a I n o a a 0000 o0a0 0000 000 � o to d t1) o N t0 N CO o N O1 N o n pp O th r n to r o t0 d tp eF Cl? d M a e m t0 r cM CO N r' N N N N O r C r C� 0 0 0 ^ ^ O O 0) Op N to O to O to to co Co co 0 Cl1 0 N rn0 nv:' n m0 �� n rn0 nconao mp d m rn m m r r r O O to r to O n to n 10 LO M M to Cl) O) C0 to n Cl) r M n N m N O N O r 0 _ O O d M O) �O 00 n n co n ld 0 m Co CA 00 @ N M Cl) Cl) M M C07 N M N Q to M to M tC) N N N N N d v d d d O N N o 0 0 0 o e o 0 0 0 0 to N ow-..o`-. oil. \ moo\-. 0 0 0 0 -- P (0 0 o v to M o O O o d r d e- o N V � mt` m = , t� nt� n o ' ntnntn ot4itoao O C C 0 0 N N N v N N N r CV r 0 6 v e- V2 .O. .-. ..� .S m x 60i x � 60i Z N O L to X N m 0 W X O CO O co w x M v o N LO p @ m -C m o N rn ao m o to to m p x v v v r m p CO m r w rn M m F- > Z5 V Q a U a W O m U Ph m to O n � 0 0 co O co tt7 0 M O Cl) C14 Otp O (D co C m .0i M d N M - CO n n .� d �- O r 0 .� �j q O O co O m y C C O co O O O m O O CO OD O N r r r O N M M N N O Y Y F- to t0 to to to I- N N N N N 1- d d d d d F- r r r r .- a Z o 0 0 0 0 w o e x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W o O r d m o o N OD N Cp o rn O N N N LO M O 0O0OMnnm MnMn xdn o o,- rn to 0 � O O N CV O O CD C r O r O O v r _ _ _ _ `. X CC CO 00 00 co O Q Q Q Q 9 m N CO M T �_ x N N T _ x m N 9 _ M N 7 Ix } } } } 0) 0 v 0) O xmtimN rnO xomLO 0 tiC°.° N rn W c0 co �2 co r m Z M , (a0 CO 00 d M 00 r 0 0) C, 0) N m M 0 0) N O I'.r M 0 +� d 0) m n 1- C. m N 0 Co O Y NCO N W +�- m Co 00 n 0 O O co LO Q M co O m n O Co coOo O O C O m I-` tt) LO LO to to F- N N N N N I- d d d M cn H a` aaa xx 0 o 0 O O O o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 F" x O ao M N x N LO N to to N to N CO w d CO o n M m 0 u n ti n N o a) It (M d 0 c�I e' dt M N C7 O O C. N r N r v v N o O o o S N v U 7 xXx -O Q Q tQ O X 7 N d .^- to Co 0 CO m CD � x LD M� M � � � � N tn Lo xdNln �- 0) nv n v am � x ��� � � � d �Ln 'It O o - O 0. O O m MM r M CO �p m to co to Co N M 00 CD OD O CO M CD Or 00 coo co r O r con OD coo O r N ro. F- d M Z Q W n In'O F- In 1 to to H N N N N N F- M M M co M F- z O Y. a 0 V1 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0� o 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 m O O O d Co d d m to m to d 0 d O M r 0 to a to to Un e It M d t0 a C� M a? M e OD CM M 00 O (7 O O O Cl CD M co r O r O C, CD CD CD N r U Lu Q o 0 ao co 0 9 x 7C x H O d a N l() U) n o cn N x O r d th x d r d e- X O co r N U } O E L O N r N N O d r d r O M r CO r O xx r M N N Wm O 0z' o. d 11 O Co N N M to to to to �p m M CD 0 t j m co II II N v M M to m to 0) O N to CO "� r N r M M ornnmrn onrnnnn oto10111(00Is o U to t0 I' N N N N N H M co M M M I- eN- W J M M Q J M M Q J CO M Q J M A Q to Q r to r tp Q r Co r - O Q r CO r to (A m U) D W W W LLI m D W w W W O N n W w W LLJ m W W W uj x 'D to �- M M M M '0 0 I- M M M M I-- M M M C^ a I- M co M M co c� Yaaaaa c� � ¢ aaaa c9 � ¢ aaacl- ¢ c� ¢ aaaa o a C 0 T OV - c 0-0 O -C >>g a O O O D \ lOCOO U) o � M M n O t[ N LO N N (.0 co N O r 0 0 C7 O r N N N N r T O r Cf) M I.f) Cn 9 Z, xx t0 0 CO r 9 � XC � t` d •t_ xX 0 co O CO 9 �_ axe Il- 0) to v 0 O X N 0 �N 0 O x N M N M O � N- o c 0 00 O X � N -- c N N N N Co r r 0 to et Cn r Ln r M CM 0) M 0 N O r ti (4 M w N O to t` o) r o) r Co 0o O 00 0 n M O co M n I,. co I-- N N N CO N M O I- f` P. f� CO co O ti 00 OG Q to to ILO to to O N Cl) 0 Cl) M H 2 N N o o o 0 0 0 z ae -olz o 0 0 0 O N o O e1 r o Co CID co U d c V M N c o) O cn to l) 00 O N CA CO r o Lo M to Ch v O y r a (mV) Y Y a' O eN- O M _ O C M O In N 0 COO r 0 O .r.- .r.. `- 0 O W Cl 00 O v rMr...N O N ... N N N ._. LLI O 0) U T to N to r d' CO '7 c0 d' O o) 0 O N 0) N O C C O cm O O M O T r r @ M Cl) M M M O C T 0 N C C O h Co to t0 Co O N N N N N O Co t0 CO 0 CD O M M CM Cl)LID Y Y f- to to to to Co H M M M co M F- 7 7 V It I- r r r r r a } } } } c e o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z �. o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O M r o 00 O 00 pp o M O M O o M O co r tLI O O M r O O o O M O P� a CA Cl) o) M e : n to O In (n 0 0 0 0 r r r s- O r C) r O CD O r J = S m S 0 < Q < o 0 0 0 Z to >- } } OoO ��CV NM $ Ovty oOv � vton ooOt°Dno � W .M- Co O N N N N z eM.. Cp Q r co to M Co to N to N to n d P, 't 1- Co to N tD V N M It � Y to CO O Oo O cn Ir.- h CA O CO N CO N O Co 0 M M c) cn O i,- N h � h O T r r r O to an Coto M O 14* M M Ln M C a s a. a. I- to to M M M to CO Cn F- to M F- et d' C �"' r r r r r co O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o i� ot� o o rntornto o mrncorn o vaotoio (, o et 0o N V n N N c O -* Vo r N O 0 So 0 0 v v V 00 7 7 N v O U16 0 a Q Q r O ``K n tC) M d 0p 00 M N P') N `_ Md' CVim' M o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O D N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 W P- N pom r O Cn r Cp r m to t0 to t0 0 C O 0 00 co 4 It Z O N FO- C00n tCOn to ui M M M M M P- a � th r N r r O c' Q C a M r M M Z C t! (n C p N N < O U C C °e o 0 0 0�° of e o 0 0 0 xx 0 o 0 m Q V O p o yxC CD 00 Oo I� o d' t- o to Cl) Cn M o u N N dt �t a 7 U U X to O N CID o cY o) et 0 x ch m Cl O) o x to to M N Q U O Q o o V T c r o T o r r r T o o r 0 Z r a a o x�C o W G N O x M o00 to r O �C M W M O O X 00 M co m CD x O M 0 0 U O O E ` 0 O X X ,� - 0 00 O et N v N 00 O to co to co 00 O to r r W O z a N N N N o (D r IT0) M O Cl) o) Cl) a) r CA d' o) Q to CO 1- r 00 } r to r 0 CO N O N O CID 0) w O M O (o W a m II co to 0) 00 0) O O pp O Cl) Cl) cn Cl) @ N O M N II It o to to to to to 5 N M M M Cl) V et a V 0 0 MCl) MCl) 0 O J � co Q J c M Q J Cl) M <C J T M Q W rn Q CO CO N Q CO r CO rn Q r CO r CO O Q CO T Co N m a to M M M M a O M Ill CCn M M a r �.- M M M M 'a) NOp O W LLI W LLI x F- M M M M Ia Utz Y Q a d d a t7 0 < a a a a c7 o d d d a s To Q ( Q a a d 0- a I h 0 a a o c 7 O O L O O 1. co E o E O N o o E ate) m co CL p m m o iD (' E o O (� c = Y a c c N rn rnrnq; :3 O N o 0 0 o c o 0 0 o N o o N 0 0 0 0 Y Y @ O O) .o\dd-.,off-..� O .off-.r�� O� o p) �� o o_ Z Of O L `y o Cl) d co U v a) ((0 ccoo (Oo (NO N r°'i O N N � N v O) _ m r Q o 0 0 o Q o 6 0 o Q o 6 0 o Q o 0 0 0 m m m W rn m V U rn rn rn rn lix DO C C C O) 4) to M oo 4) v 0 .�- N m O N h (M(o 0) Y C > Q .M....Mi.M..N > Q ct d > v.N..v N > .d...M-..�.. Y a a a a o M h I() CD o N (0 N o d o N 00 aO LU 0 0 0 0 rn o r> h o M (o M (O o ct �d d N h M o g N U o o - o 0 0 0 0 --- 0 Q < Q < co 4 0 x 0 o N W w W W h X v v h .` X 0 0 0 0 h M N M N h aM- 0 U ILUZ 0 Q x 00 O XX 00 Q �C v .- v '- CD Q N 0) (p (p N N N N 0cc Z C (D c) a N (O C0 O d h h to h cD O O N O N O N (o N co oo d CO M (0 0) �° rn o o N o W O o (o 00 to C) Q M (h M M O O O o 0 0 - a- O M - O LO M V) a a F- (D (D (O (o O H M co M M M H Ln In (n (n (O 1- P 1 a` a` :�� ' ' 'moo �o ° �. 'le�c O) o O N . o (D CO(p o CO 0 OD W o O O o (o co I-- C) c d O d o 5 O) CD O) 0) e M M o) N vvN o O O O N v(V vvN O O (0 Vh h h N a O N -- Na O 2 pp ! th0 XX ^ w.. M $ 7- Cn CM v N OO (D O N N N N 0 c) r' O) N � CD O c- c0 O l(y c0 o h M l0 d Q .� M h N O '@ 4 M M d .�- d 00 CO CD CO U) U) 'C Z N N H co (LO to (OO (LO FO- M M M (h (i 12 w V) V') LO N H d' Z d a v -o Z 0 c c a' U) . > > > c L .7 < O O(� C IR C o`o e-.o e-.o`o o^ o 0 0�o� o o o m a V 07 c M Ul)j. m I� h C, h O (O O (oo O O a o 0 U0 C LO O O I N O CN 0 Q v oM co O Q vO M v W o Z a N N h h 0 (O C. d o) N h N h N Co O c0 O CD po N O CD (O O (O M (o co cM M M M o) 00 0) co co 4f P c0 O a m II II II N co h h h h �p �p O ro co w o O h 00 h co l0 l0 (O l0 LO M M M M M l0 c} d d d d M M cl Wj � m Q W W W W to a-J CD `- c0 (9 u1 Q O M ca0, (I) Q Co eM- cao uJ co a to F-. M M M M L O �Q- M (W ccn ccn �_- fw m M co FQ-- (W+) M M M c6 ►a CO Y Q aaa a coo ¢ a a a a coo ¢ a a a a 4 a ¢ a a a a O a 1 Appendix A.2 - CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Enrollment Projections 1 1 i 1 t I Lon rn rn C0) j E CD N M M m O O O LL 0 0 0 O m >, O O O O ` = f- u') co O O m M C) 0 LL 0 0 00 0 m LL C O m V) lL) O N (D O M 00 N n LD N M m FO Rn to CMD 000 N t- M CC S �d„ M �I N- IT OOp N n M V L o m L 0 L �0 )7 y U) 2 'D co wp+ m a O co c0 M O O O O O O O �j 00 M M ^ coC ; O 3 0 v y a C N p V- Vl N U. W (on F— N O 0u7 O 0 M coO � M O CV LO N O coO �1 O (A O O CD 0000 O 0 d (A L m N •-- CO .- •-- M O M V' O t) p N N R N = m N O Ln 0 co e- 0 cM I,- Cl) O O O O y O co O O d O O O O O O O O O O CD LO a0 d N N N N M N O CO N Cl) C4 �' .y. N C V O aD _ U N- O � O0N O` MAr00 M D N L O N Lo 0 N O r' a0 ~ ^M LO L) N N O O L Y O y N d i y 4 A O cc 10 O a O Ccn co f� N N d 0 N N a LA O O LO O � O O LO r` I� N c Ln t- LO P- O O O O O L+ M I � c0 N O N m co CD O CD O N O y y y co N O M - - LA ~ V) 0 M - N )-- m ko"u m 2 2 J c0 y m +y C O LO O O LO M O O LO O c} Oi c0 Ln O a a avi Z 0 LO O CD N 0 LO O O O P M CD co 0 to O N D M r CV '1 N �- Cl) a- N el' t- N O N d' �� paa Qm N I � i •� _ � C " cD w 0 � CD Qa O v Op dt O NCh 00 MD 0 - coCD M 0)0LOm N N - Nm NN J =E ¢ ad � 'QN w �'N N C N N N N N O O N w O p O N ' LO c0 �- LO c0 �- u? CO .- Ln co �- H r` y h � Q • YcO � Y w — Ycod, YLOCrY Y � , aa � .. -• 2 0 � ' c rn Q. 0 G c .F- E O M m s= w a rn t0 = m �. IOCD O cmi aW � Y +yy 4E >_, m N y o � � o o - � m m O m m a a c ` o m - a, - m E 5 v, m = � y y W a c w m LL •a a = H m a 'a = ►- a C=i wyE WO '.`m0im , m Q C N ic . � . aa @ oc � m a aa ai °° d 0toYa >ca05mmodm 175 0 - E c 0 N = 0 Lcis=`OC N N = N .� cn (D N N (D cn m E w 3 O R o ~ JJO awl � O a` w � wg ci m Li Za C� ami ami a�0i x x O m L`o U) U) y a U p a 3 Y Y Y ; N u WN � y � IL= � � N m Q CV M v to cc D v m i O 1 N CO CO I'- O N O O I` d' M g M M d O O O O O P r P P O of ,r LO P P P P P P r P P P P P P r P N d' OP P P P r P P P P r P P f N M N CO N O �j 00 O O 0 0O O O P P P P O O O N N ►- N \ \° \ \ \ \° \° \ \ \ \ \° \° \° N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r 00 MW M M N _M M N O O) O r - N O VO O r- p- � CrO 0r0 w ONO w 0w0 O O w w O CO CO (O O I� 1- � � � O O O p O P V0 P P P P O O N f-_ I- CM I,- M I� O O O M M O C- O 00 `- N r O M CO 00 CO CO O O 00 M O O U - f N N N > O 00 It O O O O N 0 O O r W C- O M CO I,- 00 0) N O O I,- Pd' M Il- O N O O O O O O O O I- r- co OI CF) O) O) O) O O O O "t M P a O O N — P P P P P P P ce) CL � N C CC G O > O CO O O n O M n W N M o P M J N pOj O O O O O O M M M N O N O f0 O M O - r P - - P - O C Q y N W D W C O CO ce) P .O ^ N N O O dt N N O N n P f�/! p sue- ems- toco �- O M d' N toI,- O N M _ O O O O O O O O O O O � T T N Cl) co in N O M r C O O W r ti 00 n n M I� O N M � y O CD M M N O CC) eY 00 I� O M N O � o O e- to (- O CO M 0 CO LD CO 0 � O O O M co O N M f` co a0 c0 O m Q O N O O O O O O - ! Cl)P - � � O O O O O p 0 0 0 M Cl) P O � M � 0) N •- e- r r.r M o e o C a N r GO O ��i N O N 00 CO � O t O P O O r- a` N N 1l� `0 O. V O) CO (A r O O C) rN- r V N O 00 CO N M ZL N M r p 0 (� P P P P P P P O > N C i0 M C O >' \ ° \ \ \ \° \° \ \ e \ \ \ \ C N C C m o o 0 o e o 0 o O e o o O 0 d N N O O rl- O P r N M O O N CN ° u) Q N > C0 Ch Or) O aM- M CN COO COD O r dN O !6 E M N 00 O W ct 0 .P- •M- O N O O ^ O N 7 7 J ti ti O ci ad ^ 0 U O C. (h r P P P P r P r lV -• daaxs o c m n w (D , N ✓>) - O P cM O P CO P N O = Cl) N cJ' P O P d I� m + a CO CO O O 0) � P f� M O GO 1� r P [I M i 0 0 lI) O P O M CO O N N M I� M N O 0) O p) C) O O O O O O d M P O M L N O O O O O P O O N O M C=i c > P P P P P P P P P > O P P P P P P P 0 t Z CD O a w t0 Q rn o X LU CO N co wq ) w CO Q N N M LO CO N CO00 O M cP- eN- 0 a C 7 (LC Y r N d In 0) r eN- p y � 'o � a `- +O r O Co r O co r (D M r` M M O O r \ r to O O N O C r. O N v b• c CA GO c! LO o � N r-. w O r M N O O Co M Co 0 r V p°. ^ U N r` O r` O O r O O W f\ M O r, O O o) 0 r r r r N N N r N N N ti Cf) V M N Co 0 0 r ) N N N N N M O m M N M to v M M CC) ^ m M Na r r r r r �-• r• r r r M r r r r fn r N a r r r r r r rr r r r M r .-- r r 0 r N O 0 00 Co t Co M O r` -V Co fo r st O o r O In O Co r M 0 M r` O N M M W M Co M h o U r r` W O O N O M O r et r rr O CEO M r• CO 'N U O m v N In Co O w M t- O M r LO r r` O N W to et M r Co oD .O N N N N N N et N N N r` o to M N Co w p O Lo r r p O r r r r r r r` r r r M r r r r U) r nj CV M N d <' O O to M M O 1- r M N O O <- Co N O n o T" d) M Co It W r` O O N �- r+ O O N O O ~ ' U O Lo CO r` O O O Co O Co r M Co Co O (o M M U r` r r r N r- N N W m M N N to O r M r (M O M r` r O r r r r N O r r r to Co [f N N ��rr M r .O r N N N N N M N N N O et N N fo O O O O r r r r r r Co r r r M r r r r Co r CV O O r r r r r r P` r r r M r r r r l[') r, N O N d N a N V r O N O Co O M et N r r` er N M O Co M O ' r N Co r r. .t to v t- d N N r O d m 't O o 00 M �' Co r` M M CO M O O N Co 00 to N O U V d O W N O r. S(Q O r• M r Co r` r` r, OD O N r p r r r r r CO r r r �} Co M N r M 0 m � -- .0 r r r r r r O N r N Co to M N �- C'7 O " � O p O r r r r r r Co r r r M r r r r to r N p O r r r r r r F. r r r M r r r r Co � M 0 N tl N a. y p 1- N O Nt N v 00 r- M M M O C It O o N `� U N Cn O w r r et r- to O r r` W N r` to c m U O O Co r T M O N M M Co r-. N O to N N r 0 p O �h ct d r Co O M ap tb r M t` O M to CA Q) N r Co r r r O r Co O r r ^h d• M N r r - M M �.. r r r r r r 00 r r r C(? M N r r M •O O r r r r r r Co r r r M r r r r fn r N O O r r r r r r Cp r r r M r r �- r Co U cllj d i N d N a cc O a O a) U N CO M N O f+ 0Lo _D to O _O rn M to Co M o CO N V O M co N Co w N M v- M N M F- O N o M p .O0 0 0 O OO � r eM- O M 'ctN NN co N °r p .00 O O O O C Itt IT o OM M LO Cl) O ti N O O Np r r r r r r Co r r r M r r r r Co Np O r r r r r r CD r r r M r r r r Co C p 0- a. d W n O O O O O O+ r fn M O V f�- to M Co r 0 0 0 fl- Co N n o O Co m r to v M M N N N CO N r N M O O d' cp Mp .O O 0000 O N - 0 0 N n N co N O n 0- p m 0 CO 0 0 0 M r 0 0 N M N N M N V N O O O r r r r r r (Q r r r M r r r r C(y t O O O r r r r r r (C r r r M r c- r r to r N d N IZ °•� > co C>D y i > 00 O N 7 Cf7 O 0 m (o � O � r, O N � r` M r. 1+ O N M O � c � !_0 O � fa Cfl u') (A r• r` 00 N r` r` M r� r. a0 N M O � c N 7 N ^ OOOrO� lor. d OCOM WMOtncocq cmB BOO `- m0t-- �' OtOcn0cncotoCON � Lm CA �O 00 Q O 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 CO eM- eM- r V fC0 V OO a 0 0 0 0 0 0 co 0 0 0 M - - - e M U N m 3 N 0 3 N O C C o a W O 'a W r N M tt Lo CO r` M CA CN O N Q r N M V, Co Co r• 00 CA p a � c� Y F- �L Y �- a •• ILO d � ° L d j p () a > t0 ca d N a) 0 > a > ea ; ty v, L- 00 > ca °' E � « a > cB oEo a `�° « m ° Eo 3 � " " o a " L- oo o � ro o o m oc oo � d � �z -0o arCD z -0ti c tl N N CU (3) Co m ca0� m oZ �m► � La d \ Wr � N 2) 7 p0 0 0°° a '0o -a ° jgy Q ° a) Z 0 E., m� E4mtn YG. c°io O fn (O O N M N C O N C O w ' C) O M O O O U) U) M CO (O r ' U r O C C O CO O M w N 00 In r N N Q U) C M N CO N N N N m N w w C M M w O O r T T M T r T M r T r P Ln p O P r r r r r M P r P P 117 r M O (O 0 C 0 M O N C U) M T C r � O N f- co N O N M M COO Ln m ' V Q CO � P- O M O r C P � CO W M ' V 00 I- O n C M M r P T T Q N r N �(pQ L P LO M r T r N N N N N O U) M N O pO r T r r ty r r T M T r r T Ln O r r r P r P r M r r r r Ln N a N d P M O (O O I� O M N C CK1 O r CO N 00 T t r 'ItW N O N C P t` O O N O O ' U 0 N C O w CO O Q r M CO CO O CO ' U O C,) Ln Co to P Ce) r Ln (M 00 Ln Cr) f_ .� r T P r N J� T P r WLo C N N d r r r r N N N N O U) d' N NU') p 0 T r T T r LO r T T M r T r T CC) T r T r T P P P M r r r r In p N a N a N N N a 0 O T a to M C O M C O r I- C N M O U) 0 O N ' r a to COO N C U) N I� C N N r 0 C O C 00 Q O r r N M N Co M O O N U) M LO N O V W O N N O N Q O � M P CD N N W O O V Ln M N T cM � 0 U) T K O r T r r T 0 N T N O LO M N r M � In 0 OU p O r T r r T r CO T P r M r r r r w P M O O P r T r r T (O r r r M r P T P l!) Lo M N 0. N d O W r N O O C N C N I,- w M w W C 'IT O O r N M O CO P r M N Ln O r N W N I- In U O O V N 00 CO M O N N O LO I-- N O Q N M N N O O p V N 0o I` C P Q O M M M r CM f- O M LO CO Cp O N N r 0 0 O T O P U) O r r C C M N r r O O M r � 0 00 r T r M T r T LO St M N P r � ct � •O p O T r P T r T Cp r r r M r r r r LO r, N O O r P T r T T Co T r P M P T T r LO r N ^� L N d N d {c L O 'a � O O O M ao N Q ao N M M N ao I� O C V O M O CO O O O C C f- C O LO M C O O r a 0 0 0 0 0 0 M P r O M C N N N T ^ O p 0 0 0 0 0 0 M T r O Cri C CO) r N r co M O N O T r T T P T y P r P M r T r r Ln r N O M T r r r Ln P r c a a _ a _ n w Oa O '0 O 4 +a' Ln 00 O C N ]ONammowmM ul r O O O N CO N Mo Q Oo r U) C O O N N N O N r N M w co > M a 0 0 0 0 C O N r 0 '' o 00 a 0 0 0 0 O N T O O N MNNmNoMOOT P P M r r r T U) w C O O O r r T r r CO r r T M T T r r In O r Q ' N a N d E co pO� L > CO 0,` O a O Q 16 0) !- O N E N m I- N O N CM O O C + (_�0 O O m O I� 0o N I1- ti m I- ti M N M O o) c+ V N ' 7 Co r ^ Ln (� C O L() M O M (O U) CO N 0) O N ' 7 0 T Ln II- C O Lo M O M CO Ln CO N O m C = p v m N O 0 0 T 0 0 0 O M M M N M W C E = O U N M 0 N O 0 - 00 0 O M M M N M V c m Q V Q r T r CO T P P M P r r r U) P Lp E V O Q; r r r (O r T r M r r T T U) r V R N O (OS 7 R N O v (Dg e v g o m o 2 LU r a� o °- aq NM * O � Oo 20 f § OTNMC O � Oo O = F- � CL(D Y ~ CL a L c C v. k CO 7 4. t O N C w f1 E C -0 � Co -CDc0 O d O L 4? N y O > m �' O y v m tNn 0 >_ o J ; O ... 7 co (� J ' O w 3 Co .: L .. mC� e• 30 0CL Qc7 � d r' 3o � Q � c � (_n ... c 0 y o O c 0 cn o �' c0) 0) gEc IL `� eC0) `—' O� oE � L 0 0 0 � � o a 'o cu00 � � oERo � � Co0 >, �L � m c arc 2 0CD Ju (a �` y > N c N V Z m C y f co C N U co y W M R � O � a N � rn 0 W too (a te O COi � 0 . a) (. C) O x 0 0o J tw> G> O Q`Oj C O O t7 a z y o i C i c L cOn a z y o C a r (Na 0. o 0) Y Q v o a �' , 4 d O) Y (� � 0 0o g N C CD I Appendix A.3 Student Generation Survey I i I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 OI� raN tTNa ct (DMf,- aM"MNMM) r * Or d' M00 LOLONOO1,- Mr AtrM P- 0001� O 0 ti O M N m 0 0 M O M O M 0 11- MO r It CO O M Mn T CO N O LO W M r d' O M N ti O d' W OoOMONOI-- rNW - Moomr- pr- NMnd- d' N MrMNLOW C OOOrrOrO6rrrNMc- 6rr00006000006 .,- 66 00 O OOMOtnMnMO M1;T I` OOOOIl- MOMd' lt7MM") Mr I- MOMM") MOM1- LM_ 00 �11LOU") MNMnc+') 000d7MCOONNOCoC4Mo00o0d) Itf- f` OMd' Cof- 01` d LOItl- OrrMCMNd ONOc'MNM00Mc- COMr000r0ONT-' C'MN CO) N - N - Md' Oc- e- c O o O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O m N 00r000M000 CO CIO 00001` Od Mn � N0001- I- NOpMnC* OMnf- rOMC000000M�! CD d OOI`AMC) MnMnOMn01` O111, COONI- O cc) OIt Mn "tCorC I' P,- NOrtF O �- 00404rM0r- 04Mr (0004Mrd r00C> - OOOrNrrv- ONNMnMNrr _ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06 0 0 0 0 0 0 OCoI�- OOf - NOMf) CMMM) CMOr�- MlL) M oc) Of` OU) (::> ) *- c) mCoMM) f� Of- 000C0 oI- MnOrMC C> r- I- rOOCOf- f- � Nf� � I` d' NOOrrCDNMMMnI+ � LOLOC) L000M E O "tMCO 'tM � �- MN- (DV) 000MnMCOd NMNrMrNMNrM00NNL00004C40NM d o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 wq- Nr.- " ,t M Lor- 0Nm Itr- ww0Of- NN00000COd- (or-- 0M00Nwm ;r gtMI- c r NMII- Cfl q Nr LOLO MC0Mnd NLOMCD 'CT Mn co rN OONNM o F- O 'tNf�- rMNrCOC4L000NCOMnr ol- l` I- -qt (DV) M0000 ;TM NC) COCM1;T COI` rCflO N r- C V N r r r r r r r Mrs- c- r N C M aD = 0 o N d O � rMn00MnCOrrCOd' d' L{') c- MCfll- rtnOMnOrOMn NNrCflOM (fld' Od' ML7d' .� 04 c- M c- r N N U m r-+ N N C) a0NMMI;FNrI- 000OCOLOWMO gtWMl70r- OV, WMC4rMuj ql, 1 WWNI- MNM Q O E r r r M N N r r- N N N N N M N r Nr- M N N r r M CO d co O W LL �L c U � 014, 000CD0o000oOo0OoCL 00000Mn0000000000000000w as._ L O` o u QQ) 0 Q 9,Cflrqt0r- t- CONN �tMnCOOr � M00MCfl �t00 �- r00rONd O V NNrNMOMnNMC) NrN r � MMn0001- P+ 000f�- N co MnrrN CON 'R M CD CL Q L MQ N V O C) C) 00NOCONM1� COlf) OOorCONNd OCOOrd MOOMCO � OOrr oOrONM N MMNrNMMONON rN r � MMn000wr-- a r- N 00 MnrrN CON � ICT N y r r c- d r O V N C � ev a cu Mn 0 M N 1 7 r N > to s C O O O O O f0 JE -C - cn a N C Mn c Z ° (n cn a) 'v� 'in c c� cn a tna to = � La� � ca «SpRcn 3 > > o c c 3 ., Z 3 o a`ni aci U c o ws � s `m C 0 3 22 � o 0 � o � nLJw Q C O -O 0 — a) -0 N C 3 w > O -C a) a) ._ ca a) ._ O W ti � -Z U- m -o w m C) °? = Y o O •L Qw � H » > a) cn O -- 3 = W a � �' � m o � U � = c`o = g -a v � � -aa -� � � � � 2 � �_ CO O = = ° o J � � _ _ CCLCa) — cc ccccccc .� 'c O > a) a) c o (' C L ~ N N UI a) C "'' cy N o N N MO N MC N m c0 N C L L a) a LL rn N dom > .+ YYo �- cccncn `� O � -d `� a� a� a� a� a� a� a� a� yNa� a� (a � � c�v � _Z >' _5 C 14 ` L C 7 N 0 = C Y Y 1 1 Y Y Y Y a) ,. a1 a) a) a) "_"' cN cu O Ma CO a) a) .� co co ca co co Mo ca co a) = a) .� .� � f0 .� .0 Mo U) O QQQmmmmUUUUL) C) MPYYYJJJJJJJJJJm20- WE (n » > 3: CD 0 0 O 0 V tt N LO 0 to 0 LA ,Rt cM 0 M LO M 0 C0 0 to N MCMLOLOT- C) N I- 19t0004 �- r N N N OM � M CMOO � MO� O F- � F- `o o i U lnNrr- Oqt00M00qT 1f') r- d' ;TOCC) MONNLO � ca ca CO CON (D co = r_ LO 0000NCn0NM O = ca 1 N N c G> N G> T N v- 0 00 CO M d' M r- c- M M Ln �t 0 0 N � �t r- In c- In r- c � 00 !` 004V 0NM c �_ co 00N0w000 omwm0MI` 1 0md• d' LC) MOM Nr NM M MN 'It — V V_ T" a> c- ON � � Od' 0Nd co a UJ w O L-) 04C) CO MO (O Nor- N N _ O R H O C) CO 'tNeM �tOr- O ' oo 2 0 o N o O ,,- to M .- N 0 N C0 O v Ln N C) co 00 � OO � 0C4 O E r- r y O W U Jc C U N Ittco N d- ONNmm V � d• (_ OU w0 w m It00 � o0NOCOMOOd 0000 4) CY) CO Cn I- co T_ 0 N M N N O M M r- N L o m �� m •Q 3 Q E O 0 O >N 0 0 N w 0 M ~ m N V O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O > y M d ' � i Q. ` s3 01 000Ow000 'd d 00M —Iq I- Oln00CDMM -4, M WNCDWM00 ;tM0M 2 CV) N00Il- N d' MV- CV) N cMV- coU') 1 00 � 0N CO NN0r- M 'IT N M d In 41 CM CO M � a a c CO Q NCa M +i a) 1 N m L O LU to N d Z c x c Z tU 3 "-' C- CL 3 w 0 cn co c ,� a, .0 Qv = 3Oa) c �w o � 0 -0 a) � oa �, a) u) in0 _03 � oat ._ ._ -a p d p � � pF- a > a ac�i m °D cQ a�i0d �, c 3 � Yt 3 aaww c� 2 � LIJ -� -° -� a� � > oo = Q. °� oc � cc Cn � ° sm � a� a� co c CD CL Zoo :2m -V— � cpam .>_ � 00a>i � cmami � � � `mia nc`6MM00` MMco °'cl o � V� NCQUJJJJ � n. W (n N 0 QQOOOODOODo� oDUU � W 222YYJJJ2 2Z ' 1f� 0004N � � N M V O ' L LL N M M ' 0 2 c � r" N �t � MNoOO N N CO) N 'a a w CM d' O 0 O 0 0 I� E ti W N m 4) 0 'Q CL 3 as o c Z .c 0 � O 0 a... ►c Cl U eo N G L 0 _nN a 0 o 0 '0 O (-C C U) cq CN I-- i O m O� Q Q) 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q L � d ' V V y co cM O In 00 C0 0 ' & Q1 O _ ` r- a m w E 0 M cL 0 z > ZOOM O N E Nacu a.`°CL _or co co � 2EU �n a CD R O d E CQ m 0 0 '' 0a I _ I v NGn. U) U) > � � UnetN (000ce) (Y) 0 NOLnM T- ItN (OCa NLnoodlmr- lgtr.- n1` N 000d' M �4M N M UC) ++ 000ON0C) 00 Nr rOcMe- ++ � ++ C ~ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 � 0 � v LO N d 00 cM d' 00 0 W M LO O LO 0 d' O CD N �- O N W NrNLOMNLf) rM LC) 0pd d OMM r 0 0 0 0 019919 0 0 R. 0 0 0 0 N M � O = OOOOOOC70000 OOOOCD = _ L d O 0 00 00 1` M O OO O O O �t CO LO O M m O r Op r O r N = Lnrr- 00cMON000 (ON d' OON C) T- N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O r- O N = � c00000000000o c0000 � o � d ' 00 .4t00- r00m00O0o00Un Of` LC 00 67 It OMOONrMNlNtMIMM N O NOOr00000 O OONO Oqp Mulc:, Cq 000 0000 mCoC D L!J _ U') M I- M0Md COM (D V- � ON000 _ r L 0 'V rNd' qtMMrrMr00r r0N q U. N N Ln LO 4) NcMMCOM0000000CM rOCOCO C U C) Nd I� I- M000OMMNNI�- NONE .F 0 N co 1 c O "rn c LU N fA O N 'C 000000000000 (l- Ln � I,- Lot NN00o0 ' o0 i o .2 IT ItC14 (n O 7 i E F- 0 � o O j > >% MW0ONMN �- MM .;TLO NLO� 000 NLC) 000000 tj 0 CO 1` CO 0) N CO 0 1- r 0) 00 N N LO CDN N LO rr rM �- N M C r e- , i sZ O O V V O 000000NMNr00 �tU) OON OONNNOOM , N CO I- CO O N CO O I` r 0 00 N I- rM N II- eM M N M co Un a o 'H cn O Es 0 c 0 L O a) ~ O N N cn E co co O I- OQQ i > > cn ++ _ _ X I- Op 0 o E O O O L- = C � 2 N p c CO m M p N — CO AD p �- cn ca O cn co J c6 p O Q � � UUU- a- n (n = a) � � 2 co - � a oU LL. p. o -� -v -v a -v Zi c cn c n U cn CD a o c c c c c c c c - c c c c c a� m m c0 m m c0 m m N W Co p W co p 4 C) c0 6) U) N N N O N N Co 00 N cn Q) N cn (n E+_ "O J > � � � � � � � � cn _2 O Z: ca O � M - a c CUJJJJJJJJ � > NmJ (n NmJ (n � � (n ' DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE ' Issued with a 14-day comment and appeals period Description of Proposal: 1 This threshold determination analyzes the environmental impacts associated with the following actions,which are so closely related to each other that they are in effect a single course of action: ' 1. The adoption of the Auburn School District's 2008-2014 Capital Facilities Plan by the Auburn School District No. 408 for the purposes of planning for the facilities needs of the ' District; and 2. The amendment of the Comprehensive Plans of King County and the cities of Auburn and Kent to include the Auburn School District's 2008-2014 Capital Facilities Plan as part of the Capital Facilities Element of each jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan. The cities of Algona and Pacific may also amend their Comprehensive Plans to include the Auburn School District's Capital Facilities Plan as part of the Capital Facilities Element of each jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan. Proponent: Auburn School District No. 408 Location of the Proposal: The Auburn School District includes an area of approximately 58 square miles. The Cities of Auburn, Algona,Kent, and Pacific and parts of unincorporated King County fall within fthe District's boundaries. ' Lead Agency: Auburn School District No. 408 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that the proposal does not have a 1 probable significant adverse environmental impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after a review of the completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public upon request. This Determination of Nonsignifcance(DNS) is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). The ' lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date of issue. Comments must be submitted by 4:00 p.m., April 28, 2008. The responsible official will reconsider the DNS based , on timely comments and may retain, modify, -or, if significant adverse impacts are likely, withdraw the DNS. If the DNS is retained, it will be final after the expiration of the comment deadline. Responsible Official: Michael Newman Associate Superintendent,Business and Operations Auburn School District No. 408 Telephone: (253)931-4930 ' Address: Auburn School District 915 4 h Street N.E. , Auburn,WA 98002 You may appeal this determination in writing by 4:00 p.m., April 28, 2008, to ' Linda Cowan, Superintendent, Auburn School District No. 408, 915 4s' Street N.E., Auburn, WA 98002. Date of Issue: April 14,2008 Date Published: April 14,2008 ' ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAC 197-11-960 Environmental Checklist. Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the ■ environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. ■ Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. 1 You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary ' delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: , Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply". In addition, complete the Supplemental Sheet for non- project actions (part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. ' A. BACKGROUND , 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: The adoption of the Auburn School District's 2008 Capital Facilities Plan ("Capital Facilities Plan")for the purposes of planning for the District's facilities needs. The cities of Auburn and Kent and the King County and Pierce County Comprehensive Plans will ' be amended to include the Auburn School District 2008 Capital Facilities Plan in the Capital Facilities Element of each jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan. The Cities of Algona and Pacific Comprehensive Plans may be amended to include the Auburn ' School District 2008 Capital Facilities Plan in the Capital Facilities Element of each jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan. A copy of the District's Capital Facilities Plan is available for review in the District's offices. ' 2. Name of applicant: Auburn School District No.408. ' 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: , Auburn School District No. 408 915 a St.N.E. Auburn,WA 98002 Contact Person: Michael Newman,Associate Superintendent,Business/Operations Telephone: (253) 931-4930 4. Date checklist prepared: March 31, 2008 2 ' 5. Agency requesting checklist: Auburn School District No.408. 9 Y q 9 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): The Capital Facilities Plan is scheduled to be adopted by the District on April 28, 2008. After adoption, the District will forward the Capital Facilities Plan to the cities of Auburn, Algona, Kent, and Pacific, and to King County for inclusion in each jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan. The Capital Facilities Plan will be updated annually. Site-specific projects will be subject to project-level environmental review. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. ' The Capital Facilities Plan sets forth the capital improvement projects that the District plans to implement over the next six years. The District plans to construct a new middle school and a new elementary school over the next six years to meet projected student population increases. The District may also add portable facilities at existing school sites. The District will also conduct technology modernization projects at facilities throughout the District. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have undergone or will undergo additional environmental review,when appropriate,as they are developed. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None known. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. The cities of Auburn and Kent will review and adopt the Capital Facilities Plan for the purposes of updating the cities' school impact fees and incorporating the updated Plan as a part of the Capital Facilities Elements of both the Auburn and Kent Comprehensive Plans. King County will review the Plan for the purposes of ' implementing the Counties' impact fee ordinance and incorporating the Plan as a part of the Capital Facilities Element of both the King and Pierce County Comprehensive Plans. 3 11. Give a brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) This is a nonproject action. This proposal involves the adoption of the Auburn School District's 2008 Capital Facilities Plan for the purpose of planning the District's facilities needs. This proposal also involves the amendment of the cities of Auburn and Kent Comprehensive Plans and the King Counties' Comprehensive Plans to include the Auburn School District 2008 Capital Facilities Plan as a part of each jurisdiction's Capital Facilities Element of their Comprehensive Plans. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The 2008 Capital Facilities Plan will affect the Auburn School District. The District includes an area of approximately 58 square miles. The Cities of Auburn, Algona, Kent, and Pacific, and parts of unincorporated King County fall within the District's boundaries. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS , 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other The Auburn School District is comprised of a variety of topographic landforms and gradients. Specific topographic characteristics of the sites at which the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan are located have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 4 b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Specific slope characteristics at the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review. c. What general types of soils are found on the site for example, clay, sand 9 Yp ( p Y• gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Specific soil types found at the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate jvicinity? If so, describe. Unstable soils may exist within the Auburn School District. Specific soil limitations on individual project sites have been or will be identified at the time of project-level environmental review when appropriate. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject, when appropriate, to project-level environmental review and local approval at the time 1 of proposal. Proposed grading projects, as well as the purpose, type, quantity, and source of any fill materials to be used have been or will be identified at that time. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? if so, generally describe. It is possible that erosion could occur as a result of the construction projects currently proposed in the Capital Facilities Plan. The erosion impacts of the individual projects have been or will be evaluated on a site-specific basis at the time of project-level environmental review when appropriate. Individual projects have been or will be subject to local approval processes. 5 g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces , after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings?) The construction projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have required or will ' require the construction of impervious surfaces. The extent of any impervious cover constructed will vary with each project included in the Capital Facilities Plan. This , issue has been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: , The erosion potential of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan and appropriate control measures have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Relevant erosion reduction and control requirements have been or will be met. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate ■ quantities if known. ■ Various emissions, many construction-related, may result from the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan. The air-quality impacts of each project have been or will be evaluated during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. Any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project- level environmental review when appropriate. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: The individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject to project-level environmental review and relevant local approval processes when appropriate. The District has been or will be required to comply with all 6 applicable air regulations and air permit requirements. Proposed measures specific to the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 3. Water a. Surface: w in immediate vicinity of 1) Is there any surface water body on or the rmm � rty the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. There is a network of surface water bodies within the Auburn School District. The surface water bodies that are in the immediate vicinity of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. When necessary, the surface water regimes and flow patterns have been or will be researched and incorporated into the designs of the individual projects. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may require work near the surface waters located within the Auburn School District. Applicable local approval requirements have been or will be satisfied. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Information with respect to the placement or removal of fill and dredge material as a component of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be provided during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Applicable local regulations have been or will be satisfied. 7 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known, Any surface water withdrawals or diversions required in connection with the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? if so, note location on the site plan. Each project included in the Capital Facilities Plan, if located in a floodplain area, has been or will be required to meet applicable local regulations for flood areas. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? if so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. Specific information regarding the discharge of waste materials that may be required as a result of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be provided during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. b. Ground: 1) Will groundwater be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may impact groundwater resources. The impact of the individual projects included in the , Capital Facilities Plan on groundwater resources has been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Each project has been or will be subject to applicable local regulations. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. will discharged 'n o the round , 2) Describe waste material that wil beinto g from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or Oumans the system(s) are expected to serve. 8 The discharges of waste material that may take place in connection with the projects included in the Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review. c. Water Runoff(including storm water): 1 Describe the source of runoff(including storm water) and method d of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow?Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may have stormwater runoff consequences. Specific information regarding the stormwater impacts of each project has been or will be provided during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Each project has been or will be subject to applicable local stormwater regulations. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? if so, generally describe. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may result in the discharge of waste materials into ground or surface, waters. The specific impacts of each project on ground and surface waters have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Each project has been or will be subject to all applicable regulations regarding the discharge of waste materials into ground and surface waters. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Specific measures to reduce or control runoff impacts associated with the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 9 4. Plants: a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, as other p aspen, evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation A variety of vegetative zones are located within the Auburn School District. Inventories of the vegetation located on the sites of the projects proposed in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be developed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Some of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may require the removal or alteration of vegetation. The specific impacts on vegetation of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. The specific impacts to these species from the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be determined during project-level environmental review when appropriate. , d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plans, or other measures to preserve , or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Measures to preserve or enhance vegetation at the sites of the projects included in the ' Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Each project is or will be subject to applicable local landscaping requirements. 10 5. Animals: a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: An inventory of species that have been observed on or near the sites of the projects proposed in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be developed during project- level environmental review when appropriate. b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Inventories of threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be developed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. The impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan on migration routes have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: -Appropriate measures to preserve or enhance wildlife have been or will be determined during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 6. Energy and Natural Resources: a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. The State Board of Education requires the completion of a life-cycle cost analysis of all heating, lighting, and insulation systems before it will permit specific school projects to proceed. The energy needs of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be determined at the time of specific engineering and site 11 design planning when appropriate. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. b. Would our project affect the potential use of solar energy b adjacent Y p 1 p 9Y Y 1 properties? If so, generally describe: The impacts of the ,P 'ects included in the Capital Facilities Plan on the solar p roJ p potential of adjacent projects have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of j this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: j Energy conservation measures proposed in connection with the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be considered during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 7. Environmental Health: a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan comply or will comply with all current codes, standards, rules, and regulations. Individual projects have been or will be subject to project-level environmental review and local approval at the time they are developed,when appropriate. 12 b. Noise: 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)?- A variety of noises from traffic, construction, residential, commercial, and industrial areas exists within the Auburn School District. The specific noise sources that may affect the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may create normal construction noises that will exist on short-term bases only. The construction projects could increase traffic around the construction sites on a short-term basis. Because the construction of additional school capacity will increase the capacity of the District's school facilities, this project may create a slight increase in traffic-related or operations-related noise on a long-term basis. Similarly, the placement of portables at school sites will increase the capacity of school facilities and may create a slight increase in traffic-related or operations-related noise. Neither of these potential increases is expected to be significant. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: The projected noise impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be evaluated and mitigated during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Each project is or will be subject to applicable local regulations. 8. Land and Shoreline Use: a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? There are a variety of land uses within the Auburn School District, including residential,commercial,industrial, institutional,utility,open space,recreational,etc. 13 b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. The known sites for the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have not been used recently for agriculture. c. Describe any structures on the site. The structures located on the sites for the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified and described during project-level environmental review when appropriate. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? The structures that will be demolished as a result of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan, if any, have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? The sites that are covered under the Capital Facilities Plan have a variety of zoning classifications under the applicable zoning codes. Site-specific zoning information has been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Inventories of the comprehensive plan designations for the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be completed during project- level environmental review when appropriate. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? t Shoreline master program designations of the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-level t environmental review when appropriate. 14 h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Any environmentally sensitive areas located on the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? The Auburn School District currently serves approximately 14,060 full-time equivalent ("FTE") students. Enrollment is expected to increase to approximately 15,450 FTE students by the 2013-2014 school year. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Any displacement of people caused by the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be evaluated during project-level environmental review when appropriate. However, it is not anticipated that the Capital Facilities Plan, or any of the projects contained therein,will displace any people. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject to project-level environmental review and local approval when appropriate. Proposed mitigating measures have been or will be developed at that time, when necessary. I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The compatibility of the specific projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan with existing uses and plans has been or will be assessed as part of the comprehensive planning process and during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 9. Housing: 9 a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. No housing units would be provided in connection with the completion of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan. 15 b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. It is not anticipated that the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will eliminate any housing units. The impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan on existing housing have been or will be evaluated during project-level environmental review when appropriate. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Measures to reduce or control any housing impacts caused by the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 10. Aesthetics: i a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? The aesthetic impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? The aesthetic impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: ' Y Appropriate measures to reduce or control the aesthetic impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be determined on a project- level basis when appropriate. i l 16 11. Light and Glare: a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? The light or glare impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review, when appropriate. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? The light or glare impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Off-site sources of light or glare that may affect the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be evaluated during project-level environmental review when appropriate. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Proposed measures to mitigate light and glare impacts have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 12. Recreation: a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? There are a variety of formal and informal recreational facilities within the Auburn School District. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. The recreational impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have ' been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 17 The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan, including proposed new school facilities, may enhance recreational opportunities and uses. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Adverse recreational effects of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject to mitigation during project-level environmental review when appropriate. School facilities usually provide recreational facilities to the community in the form of play fields and gymnasiums. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation: a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. There are o o c o ' listed o f n known places or objects 1 ste on, or proposed for, such registers or the project sites included in the Capital Facilities Plan. The existence of historic and cultural resources on or next to the sites has been or will be addressed in detail during project-level environmental review when appropriate. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. An inventory of historical sites at or near the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be developed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: t Appropriate measures will be proposed on a project-level basis when appropriate. 14. Transportation: a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The impact on public streets and highways of the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 18 b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? The relationship between the specific projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan and public transit has been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Inventories of parking spaces located at the sites of the projects included in the Capital P g p P J P Facilities Plan and the impacts of specific projects on parking availability have been or will be conducted during project-level environmental review when appropriate. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). The need for new streets or roads, or improvements to existing streets and roads has been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Use of water, rail, or air transportation has been or will be addressed during project- level environmental review when appropriate. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. The traffic impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: The mitigation of traffic impacts associated with the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 19 15. Public Services: a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. The District does not anticipate that the projects identified in the Capital Facilities Plan will significantly increase the need for public services. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. New school facilities have been or will be built with automatic security systems, fire alarms,smoke alarms,heat sensors,and sprinkler systems. 16. Utilities: a. Circle utilities currentlyavailable at the site: electricit natural as water, Y� 9 > refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. Electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, and sanitary sewer utilities are available at the known sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan. The types of utilities available at specific project sites have been or will be addressed inmore detail during project-level environmental review when appropriate. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Utility revisions and construction needs have been or will be identified during project- level environmental review when appropriate. 1 i 1 20 1 C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that ttbe,lead agency is relying on t em to make its decision. Signatur . Date Submitted: 21 D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. Ho would theproposal be likes to increase discharge towater;w h y ae g emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? To the extent the Capital Facilities Plan makes it more likely that school facilities, including new high school, middle school and elementary school capacity, will be constructed, some of these environmental impacts will be more likely. Additional impermeable surfaces, such as roofs, access roads, and sidewalks could increase stormwater runoff, which could enter surface or ground waters. Heating systems, emergency generators, and other school equipment that is installed pursuant to the Capital Facilities Plan could result in air emissions. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan should not require the production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances, with the possible exception of the storage of diesel fuel or gasoline for emergency generating equipment. The District does not anticipate a significant increase in the production of noise from its facilities, although the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will increase the District's student capacities. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Proposed measures to mitigate any such increases described above have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Stormwater detention and runoff will meet applicable County and/or City requirements and may be subject to National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ("NPDES") permitting requirements. Discharges to air will meet applicable air pollution control requirements. Fuel oil will be stored in accordance with local and state requirements. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? The Capital Facilities Plan itself will have no impact on these elements of the environment. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may require clearing plants off of the project sites and a loss to animal habitat. These impacts have been or 22 will be addressed in more detail during project-level environmental review when appropriate. The projects included in the Plan are not likely to generate significant impacts on fish or marine life. Proposed measures ures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: Specific measures to protect and conserve plants, animals, and fish cannot be identified at this time. Specific mitigation proposals will be identified, however, during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? The construction of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will require the consumption of energy. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be constructed in accordance with applicable energy efficiency standards. 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? The Capital Facilities Plan and individual projects contained therein should have no impact on these resources. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: No specific measures are being proposed at this time. Appropriate measures would be proposed during project-specific review. Annual updates of this Plan will be coordinated with the Cities of Auburn, Algona, Kent, and Pacific, and King County as part of the Growth Management Act process, one of the purposes of which is to protect environmentally sensitive areas. To the extent the School District's facilities planning process is part of the overall Growth Management planning process, these resources are more likely to be protected. 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? The Capital Facilities Plan will not have any impact on land or shoreline use that is incompatible with existing comprehensive plans, land use codes, or shoreline 23 management plans. The District does not anticipate that the Capital Facilities Plan or the projects contained therein will directly affect land and shoreline uses in the area served by the District. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: i No measures to avoid or reduce land use impacts resulting from the Capital Facilities Plan or the projects contained therein are proposed at this time. 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? The construction projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may create temporary increases in the District's need for public services and utilities. The new school facilities will increase the District's demands on transportation and utilities. These increases are not expected to be significant. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: No measures to reduce or respond to such demands are proposed at this time. 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. The Capital Facilities Plan will not conflict with any laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. 1 t 1 1 24 f Kent City Council Meeting Date October 21, 2008 Item No. 6A - 6B CONSENT CALENDAR 6. City Council Action: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds to approve Consent Calendar Items A through V. Discussion Action 6A. ARproval of Minutes. Approval of the minutes of the regular Council meeting of October 7, 2008. 6B. Anproval of Bills. Approval of payment of the bills received through September 30 and paid on September 30 after auditing by the Operations Committee on October 7, 2008. Approval of checks issued for vouchers: Date Check Numbers Amount 9/30/08 Wire Transfers 3428-3445 $1,661,210.21 9/30/08 Regular Checks 624872-625332 3,205,730.29 Void Checks -3,375.00 Use Tax Payable 1,250.61 $4,864,816.11 Approval of checks issued for payroll for September 1 through September 15 and paid on September 19, 2008: Date Check Numbers Amount 9/19/08 Checks 307476-307774 $ 222,966.80 9/19/08 Advices 236557-237316 1,499,202.10 $1,722,168.90 9/19/08 Void/Reissue 307239 9/19/08 Void Check 307775 -782.79 9/19/08 Reissue Check Approval of checks issued for payroll for September 16, through September 30 and paid on October 3, 2008: Date Check Numbers Amount 10/3/08 Checks 307776-308061 $ 211,534.77 10/3/08 Advices 237317-238077 1,504,466.25 $1,716,001.02 e Kent City Council Meeting KENT W A S H I N O T O N October 7, 2008 The regular meeting of the Kent City Council was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Cooke. Councilmembers present: Albertson, Danielson, Harmon, Ranniger, Raplee, and Thomas. Clark was excused from the meeting. (CFN-198) CHANGES TO THE AGENDA A. From Council, Administration. Staff. (CFN-198) Raplee added Consent Calendar Item O - Excused Absence for Councilmember Clark. CAO Hodgson added another item under Executive Session - Union Negotiations. B. From the Public. (CFN-198) There were no changes from the audience. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS A. Public Recognition. (CFN-198) There were no public recognition items. B. Community Events. (CFN-198) Ranniger announced that Saturday night, October 11, 2008, Gaelic Storm is performing at the Kent-Meridian Performing Arts Center. Albertson announced that October is Domestic Violence Awareness Month. Raplee announced the Town Hall Meeting being held next Tuesday, October 14th from 5:30-7:30 p.m. at Fire Station 73 on Military Road S. C. Employee of the Month. (CFN-147) Mayor Cooke announced that Rosalie Givens, Facilities Assistant, has been selected as Employee of the Month for October. Parks Director Watling and Facilities Supervisor Charles Lindsey com- mented about the great work she does for City staff and congratulated her on being selected Employee of the Month. D. Economic Development and Kent Event Center Updates. (CFN-825j1305) Ben Wolters spoke about the overall economic statistics of King County over the past couple of years, and noted that Kent has the highest gross business income in South King County. Wolters gave an update on the Kent Events Center. He announced that the City reached a preliminary agreement with the company VisionOne to name the building after their primary product ShoWare which is a comprehensive on-line ticketing and box office management system. E. Public Safety Report and Swearing In Ceremony. (CFN-122) Police Chief Strachan updated statistics for portions of September and October, and also com- pared statistics from last year. He elaborated on some of the current data base systems in place. He mentioned the classes at Kent-Meridian High School for students interested in police work and noted that the new Lake Meridian marine unit has been received. Chief Strachan introduced six corrections officers who are in various stages of training and four new police officers. Mayor Cooke administered the Oath of Office to the new police officers. 1 Kent City Council Minutes October 7, 2008 Chief Strachan presented Debra LeRoy with the Chief's Award for Distinguished Service and explained that this award is presented for consistently performing at an exemplary level over a long period of time. He said Ms. LeRoy has shown diligence, success in working for the tax payer and high-quality work, which has been recognized as a vital element to the police department. F. Proclamation — ReLeaf 2008. (CFN-155) Victoria Andrews of the Parks Department explained ReLeaf 2008 activities and accepted the proclamation. G. Proclamation — Make a Difference Day. (CFN-155) Victoria Andrews of the Parks Department explained activities which will take place on Make a Difference day and accepted the proclamation. H. Proclamation — Flood Awareness Month. (CFN-155) Mike Mactutis, Environmental Engineering Manager, explained how the City and agencies through- out the state promote awareness of flood planning and accepted the proclamation. CONSENT CALENDAR Raplee moved to approve Consent Calendar Items A through O. Harmon seconded and the motion carried. A. ADuroval of Minutes. (CFN-198) Minutes of the regular Council meeting of September 16, 2008, were approved. B. Approval of Bills. (CFN-104) Payment of the bills received through September 15 and paid on September 15 after auditing by the Operations Committee on September 18, 2008, were approved. Approval of checks issued for vouchers: Date Check Numbers Amount 9/15/08 Wire Transfers 3407-3427 $6,266,782.58 9/15/08 Regular Checks 624340-624871 1,696,424.18 Use Tax Payable 3,316.02 $7,966,522.78 Checks issued for payroll for August 16 through August 31 and paid on September 5, 2008, were approved: Date Check Numbers Amount 9/5/08 Checks 307176-307475 $ 257,283.63 9/5/08 Advices 235804-236556 1,489,646.80 $1,746,930.43 C. Joint Funding Agreement for the Cooperative Data—Collection Program with the U.S. Geological Survey. (CFN-1038) The Mayor was authorized to sign the Joint Funding Agreement between the City and the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) for $46,610 for the U.S. Geological Survey to provide operation, 2 Kent City Council Minutes October 7, 2008 maintenance, and data collection at the Springbrook Creek, Mill Creek, and Rock Creek Gaging stations, subject to the terms and conditions acceptable to the City Attorney and Public Works Director. The City's contribution is $46,610 to the annual program costs of $88,650 with the USGS providing the remainder. D. Kentview, Phase III Bill of Sale. (CFN-484) The Bill of Sale for the Kentview, Phase III Development, which includes 1409 linear feet of streets, 1370 linear feet of storm sewer lines, 17 catch basins, 400 linear feet of swales/ditches, and 23,780 cubic feet of detention pond storage was accepted. The project is located at 42"d Avenue South (212th Street & 216th Street). E. Oracle Database Maintenance Service. (CFN-1155) The Mayor was authorized to sign all necessary documents to purchase Oracle database maintenance services for Permit Management and Police Records Systems in an amount not to exceed $45,000. F. United Way of South King County Homelessness Coordination Grant. (CFN-118) The Mayor was authorized to sign the $35,000 grant from United Way of King County, the expenditure of funds in the Housing and Human Services budget was approved, and the Mayor was authorized to sign all necessary docu- ments. United Way of King County awarded this grant to continue the planning and coordination efforts that address homelessness in South King County. G. 2009 Washington State Arts Commission Organizational Support Grant. (CFN-839) The $6,750 grant from the Washington State Arts Commission was accepted, the expenditure of funds in the Kent Arts Commission's budget was approved, and the Parks Director was authorized to sign all necessary documents. The Kent Arts Commission will use the funding to support the presentation of arts and cultural activities at Kent's 2009 Cornucopia Days. H. King County Natural Resource Stewardship Network Grant. (CFN-118) The $6,000 grant from the King County Natural Resources Stewardship Network j was accepted, the expenditure of funds in the Clark Lake Management Plan budget was approved, and the Parks Director was authorized to sign all necessary docu- ments. The grant will support Make A Difference Day activities at Clark Lake Park. I. 2009 Operating Budget — Set Date for Second Public Hearing. (CFN-186) October 21, 2008, was set as the date for the second public hearing on the 2009 Budget. J. 2009-2014 Capital Improvement Plan — Set Date for Second Public Hearing. (CFN-775) October 21, 2008, was set as the date for the second public hearing on the 2009-2014 Capital Improvement Plan. K. 2008 Tax Levy for 2009 Budget — Set Date for Public Hearing. (CFN-104) October 21, 2008, was set as the date for the public hearing on the 2008 Tax Levy for the 2009 budget. 3 Kent City Council Minutes October 7, 2008 L. Comprehensive Plan Amendment including Capital Improvement Plan and School District Capital Facilities Plan — Set Date For Public Hearing. (CFN-775,961&1000) October 21, 2008, was set as the date for a public hearing to consider amendment of the Capital Facilities Element of the Kent Comprehensive Plan and amendment of Chapter 12.13 Kent City Code to incorporate the updated Capital Facilities Plans of the Auburn, Kent and Federal Way School Districts, the City`s 2009-2014 Capital Improvement Plan, and changes to adopted school impact fees. M. LID 359, 116th Avenue SE, Final Assessment Roll — Set Hearing Date. (CFN-1300) November 18, 2008, was set as the revised date for the Public Hearing on the confirmation of the Final Assessment Roll for LID 359. The City had previously set September 16, 2008, as the date for the hearing, but notice had to be adjusted when staff learned that an apartment building within the assessment area had been converted to condominiums, changing ownership on that property from one legal owner to approximately 39 legal owners. As construction nears completion, the City is ready to finalize the LID. The total final assessment of $1,331,231.69 is less than the preliminary assessment of $2,015,197.59. N. 2nd Avenue Pedestrian Improvement Project. (CFN-171) The 2nd Avenue Street Improvements Project was accepted as complete and release of retainage to Dennis R. Craig Construction, upon standard releases from the state and release of any liens. The original contract amount was $338,673.59. The final contract amount was $273,615.60. ADDED ITEM O. Excused Council Absence. (CFN-198) Excused absence for Councilmember Clark from tonight's meeting was approved. OTHER BUSINESS A. Lower Green River Property Acauisition Proiect Lease. (CFN-239) The Desimone`s had a lease agreement with Majestik Trucking for $1,500 per month. Per Federal Relocation requirements, Majestik Trucking was given notice to vacate 90 days after August 28, 2008. The lease will cover the time allowed for Majestik Trucking to find a suitable location to relocate its facilities. The City will receive $1,500 per month for three months, for a total of $4,500 if Majestik Trucking uses the property for the full term of the lease. The lease requires that Majestik Trucking give the City 14 days notice if it plans to vacate the property before the end of the lease. Mike Mactutis, Environmental Engineering Manager, explained how this lease agreement was reached and noted that this lease is for the protection of the tenant as well as the City. Ranniger moved to authorize the Mayor to sign a lease agreement with Majestik Trucking from September 1, 2008 to November 30, 2008, for a portion of the Desimone Parcel on the Lower Green River Property Acquisition Project, subject to final terms and conditions acceptable to the City Attorney and Public Works Director. Harmon seconded and the motion carried. 4 Kent City Council Minutes October 7, 2008 REPORTS A. Council President. (CFN-198) Raplee reiterated that the Town Hall meeting is next Tuesday, from 5:30 to 7:30 p.m. at the Fire Station on Military Road. B. Mayor. (CFN-198) Mayor Cooke stated there will be a temporary closure on West Cloudy for asphalt overlay and that staff is working on traffic control measures for the Event Center area. Mayor Cooke described a few reviews done by the U.S. Dept. of Housing and Urban Development, Standard and Poor's, and two audits by the State of Washington and thanked staff for their professionalism working for the City. She mentioned the call for nominations by the Suburban Cities Association and said that this is a great opportunity to have regional representation. C. Operations Committee. (CFN-198) No report was given. D. Parks and Human Services Committee. (CFN-198) Albertson announced that the Kent Domestic Violence Task Force meets the second Wednesday of each month at 12 noon in the Centennial Building, Fourth Floor Conference Room, 400 West Gowe Street, please call the Housing and Human Services Department at 253- 856-5070, for more information. E. Planning and Economic Qevelopment Committee. (CFN-198) Albertson thanked Ben Wolters for the news that the City is entering into negotiations with VisionOne for the naming rights of the Kent Event Center. She noted that the next Planning and Economic Development Committee meeting is October 13th at 5:00 p.m. F. Public Safety Committee. (CFN-198) Harmon noted that because of the Town Hall Meeting next Tuesday, October 14th at 5:30 p.m. at the Fire Station on Military Road, the Public Safety Committee will have a special meeting at 4:00 p.m. on October 14th. G. Public Works Committee. (CFN-198) No report was given H. Administration. (CFN-198) CAO Hodgson announced that the Kent School District Board of Directors and Council will meet on Wednesday, October 15th from 7:00-9:00 p.m. at the School District Headquarters. He noted the Council Workshop on October 21st will be at 5:00 p.m., making it a special meeting, for ongoing discussion of the 2009 Budget. Hodgson announced that the Boundary Review Board has scheduled a public hearing for the Panther Lake annexation to be held on October 28th, 7:00 p.m. at Sunrise Elementary School and that there will be a second meeting on October 30th, 7:00 p.m. at Sunrise Elementary School, if needed. He pointed out that this meeting is for the City to present the annexation proposal and they will take public testimony, action will be taken within 30 days. 5 Kent City Council Minutes October 7, 2008 Hodgson noted that there are four items, three relating to property negotiations with action on one item and an update on potential union negotiations for discus- sion during executive session, which should take approximately 30 minutes, with action afterward. EXECUTIVE SESSION The meeting recessed to Executive Session at 8:25 p.m. and reconvened at 9:08 p.m. ACTION AFTER EXECUTIVE SESSION A. Property Acquisition. (CFN-239) Hodgson stated a purchase and sales agreement has been negotiated with the owner of a piece of property near the Aukeen Court and Kent Jail for the purchase price of $407,500. He also stated that with purchasing the property, removing the house, and turning it into more parking is part of the expansion project for the Aukeen Court. Ranniger moved to recommend authorizing the Mayor to sign the real estate purchase and sale agreement with Frank A. and Maria L. Scarsella for $407,500, including earnest money as well as any other documents needed to complete the transaction. This amount will be payable at closing, subject to final terms and conditions acceptable to the City Attorney. Danielson seconded and the motion carried. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 9:10 p.m. (CFN-198) Mary Simmons Deputy City Clerk l 6 Kent City Council Meeting Date October 21, 2008 Category Consent Calendar - 6C 1. SUBJECT: SIX-YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM - SET DATE FOR PUBLIC HEARING 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Set November 18, 2008, as the public hearing date to consider the draft 2009-2014 Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). The draft 2009-2014 Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) has 39 projects for a combined total of $542,727,100. By identifying projects in its six year TIP, the City is able to look for funding partners and apply for grants, which aids the City in determining which projects are feasible. 3. EXHIBITS: Public Works Memorandum and draft 2009-2014 TIP 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Director (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? X Revenue? Currently in the Budget? Yes No X 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Larry R. Blanchard, Public Works Director Phone: 253-856-5500 • Fax: 253-856-6500 j KENT WASHINGTON Address: 220 Fourth Avenue S. Kent, WA 98032-5895 Date: September 24, 2008 To: Chair Deborah Ranniger and Public Works Committee Members PW Committee Meeting Date: October 6, 2008 From: Cathy Mooney, Senior Transportation Planner Through: Larry Blanchard, Public Works Director Subject: Set Public Hearing Date for the Draft 2009-2014 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Motion: Move to recommend that the Public Works Committee forward the Draft 2009-2014 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) to the full Council and recommend that Council set a date for the Public Hearing. Summary: The Draft 2009-2014 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) has 39 projects for a combined $542,727,100. Identifying these projects in our Six Year TIP allows the City to look for funding partners and apply for grants on each to see if these projects will be feasible. r The Draft 2009-2014 Six Year TIP has no new projects but does include $21,066,600 of increases in construction costs, inflation and modifications to scopes of work. U\PWComrmtteeWctmnPage\I0 06 08\DraR 6Yr TIP Recommend Set Date for Public Hearing doc CITY OF KENT WASHINGTON SIX-YEAR TRANSPORTS �TION IMPROVEMEN�'�» PROGRAM �2009 t Mayor Suzette ,Cog KEN T WASHINGTON` Larry R. Blanchard, Director of Public Works CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2009-2014 Introduction What is the Six Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)? The Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is a short-range planning document that is annually updated based on needs and policies identified through a variety of sources. Project and financial development involve interactions with many groups and agencies at the local, regional, state and federal levels. It represents Kent's current list of needed projects that may begin work in the next six years. The document also identifies secured or reasonably expected revenue sources for each of the projects included in the TIP. Typically, projects listed in the first three years of the document are shown as having secured funding or there are reasonable expectations to acquire those funds, while projects in the last three years can be partially funded and be seeking funding partners. All projects are consistent with the City's adopted 2004 Comprehensive Plan. Mandated by State Law State law requires that each city develop a local TIP and that it G Y P be updated annually (RCW 35.77.010). In order for cities to compete for transportation funding grants from Federal and State sources most granting agencies require that projects be included in the TIP. Summary The 2009 Six Year TIP contains no substantive changes from last year's Program. All projects and programs have been reviewed for adjustments in scope and budget but no new projects have been added. Once adopted, the TIP helps to guide funding and implementation priorities during the development of the transportation portion of the city's Six-Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP). CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2009-2014 Project Project Name Number Project Location and Extent 1. James Street Improvements Union Pacific Railroad to 4`h Avenue North 2. 41h Avenue North at Cloudy Street Intersection Improvement 3. East Valley Highway(84th Avenue South) Improvements SR 167 to South 212` Street 4. South 2281h Street/Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad Grade Separation Grade Separation crossing at Burlington Northern/Santa Fe Railroad 5. Kent Station Mitigation Projects Widen Willis Street at 4`h Avenue and Central Avenue at Willis Street 6. Smart Growth Initiative Smith Street at Lincoln 7. 72"d Avenue South Extension South 200`h Street to South 196`h Street 8. Southeast 2561h Street Widening, Phase II ' SR 516(Kent Kangley Road) to 116`h Avenue Southeast 9. South 228 to Street Pavement Rehabilitation Lakeside Boulevard to 72"d Avenue South 10. Central Avenue South Pavement Rehabilitation Green River Bridge to East Willis Street (SR 516) 11. South 2241h Street Extension 84`h Avenue South to 104`h Avenue Southeast (Benson Road) (SR 515) 12. Military Road South at Reith Road. Intersection Improvement CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2009-2014 13. 801h Avenue South Widening South 196`h Street to South 188`h Street 14. Willis Street (SR 516)/Union Pacific Railroad Grade Separation Grade Separation Crossing at Union Pacific Railroad(UPRR) 15. Willis Street(SR 516)/Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad Grade Separation Grade Separation Crossing at Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad 16. South 212th Street/Union Pacific Railroad Grade Separation Grade Separation Crossing at Union Pacific Railroad 17. South 212th Street/Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad Grade Separation Grade Separation Crossing at Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad 18. South 228th Street/Union Pacific Railroad Grade Separation Grade Separation crossing at Union Pacific Railroad t19. Southeast 256th Street and 132nd Avenue Southeast Intersection Intersection Improvements 20. Southeast 248th Street Improvements 116`h Avenue Southeast to 132n`i Avenue Southeast 21. t08th Avenue Southeast Extension Southeast Kent Kangley Road(SR 516) to Southeast 256`h Street 22. I-5/South 272nd Street Interchange Reconstruction, Phase I Improve S. 272 at I-5 to add capacity. Provide transit and prepare HOV Direct-Access between South 272nd street for construction. 23. Military Road South Widening South 272"d Street to Kent-Des Moines Road (State Route 516) 24. South 272nd Street Widening, Phase II Pacific Highway South to Military Road South CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2009-2014 25. SR 181/West Valley Highway/Washington Avenue Widening Meeker Street north to approximately the 218`h block 26. West Meeker Street Widening—Phase I 64`h Avenue South to the Green River Bridge 27. West Meeker Street Widening—Phase II Lake Fenwick Road to the east side of the Green River 28. 132"d Avenue Southeast Widening—Phase 1 Southeast 288`h Street to Kent Kangley Road(SR 516) 29. 132"d Avenue Southeast Widening—Phase II Kent Kangley Road(SR 516) to Southeast 248`h Street 30. 132"d Avenue Southeast Widening—Phase III Southeast 248`h Street to Southeast 236`h Street 31. Southeast 256th Street Widening—Phase III ' 132"d Avenue Southeast to 148`h Avenue Southeast 32. South 2081h Street Improvements 84`h Avenue South to 96`h Way South 33. South 196th/192"d Street Corridor—Phase III j 84`h Avenue South (East Valley Highway) to 108`h Avenue Southeast(SR 515) 34. Transportation Master Plan p e Ongoing Citywide Program 35. Bicycle Improvements Ongoing Citywide Program 36. Americans with Disabilities Act Compliance and the Sidewalk Repair and Rehabilitation System Ongoing Citywide Program 37. Guardrail and Safety Improvements ' Ongoing Citywide Program CITY OF KENT ' SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2009-2014 38. Community Based Circulating Shuttles Ongoing Citywide Programs 39. Transit Now Service Partnership Program Ongoing Citywide Program a _ AV 49 L cn ++ _ •ice CL 7; - (� r N uJ 0. Q o U) z o ; 0 0 Q C 0 �m' �. ■� ■� L a i ca N co o V m 4 m oCL i �r I'' "aS3w94t L w N 1 `1 r a'I\V vi Ul. ci 111 N'> t Ul V W; L; 3S],AV JE M N w 3 I i .. . 3S 3AV vi 1" ?j I 3S JAV 9ll dS 31W 91 v 1F co cn CAB-90t T�q, f _. a. y ��U . `n ■ CM I LU W 9 n o In �S CJN lou id! n iMr� F _.. ®- N \\ CVT inu uNi l AMHA3'1IVAISV3 S3AbCJ � F t 3AVIVUN3J W_0 AMH A311 LS M d'® HLO 4 . p¢'apelUJ.)ylJoN u046wjmp � cc1 ' co m 000JIIe?I 3110PA IlAFl- CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2009 ' PROJECT #I: James Street Improvements Union Pacific Railroad to 4`h Avenue North DESCRIPTION: Widen .lames Street between the Union Pacific Railroad and 4«' Avenue North to provide exclusive left turn lanes eastbound and westbound at the Regional Justice Center/Kent Events Center entrances, and to install a westbound bike lane. Install a traffic signal at the intersection of the ' RJC/Events Center entrances. The project will include the construction of full width paving, curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street lighting, storm drainage, utility undergrounding and pedestrian gates at the Union Pacific Railroad. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering.................S 150,000 Right of Way Acquisition...............$350,000 Construction ................................$2,100,000 TOTAL........................................$2,600,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The location of the main entrance into the Kent Events Center will be opposite the existing driveway into the Regional Justice Center. A signalized intersection, along with dedicated left turn pockets, widened sidewalks and improved street lighting are required to provide for smooth and safe access to and from the Kent Events Center. - -AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State];CMAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal];FAST—Freight 1 Action Strategy for Fverett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor;FMSIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA— Federal Transit Administration[Federal];HES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems [Federal];LID—Local Improvement District;PWTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State];STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal]; TIA—Transportation Improvement Account; TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State],TPP— ' Transportation Partnership Program[State] CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2009 , PROJECT #2: 41h Avenue North at Cloudy Street ' Intersection Improvement DESCRIPTION: Widen 4`' Avenue North at the Cloudy Street intersection to provide exclusive left turn lanes northbound and southbound. Improve Cloudy Street east and west of 41" Avenue as required to provide for intersection improvements. Install a traffic signal at the intersection. The project will include the construction of full width paving, curbs and gutters, sidewalks, ' street lighting, storm drainage, and utility undergrounding. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering.................$120,000 Right of Way Acquisition...............$530,000 ' Construction ................................$2,150,000 TOTAL........................................$2,800,000 ' FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent PROJECT , JUSTIFICATION: Traffic volumes along 4'" Avenue and the number of residences in the adjoining neighborhood results in significant congestion at this intersection in the morning and evening peak hours. ' - -AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State];CMAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FAST—Freight 2 Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor;FMSIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA— ' Federal Transit Administration[Federal];HES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems [Federal];LID—Local Improvement District;PWTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State],STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal];TIA—Transportation Improvement Account; TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State]; TPP— Transportation Partnership Program[State] ' CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2009 PROJECT #3: East Valley Highway (841h Avenue South) Improvements. SR 167 to South 212"Street i DESCRIPTION: Widen the roadway to provide 3 general purpose lanes in each direction with a center left-turn lane between South 212`h Street and State Route 167. Construct new curb, gutters and sidewalks on both sides of the roadway to provide a complete sidewalk system. Remove and rehabilitate the existing roadway pavement to add service life to the roadway. Overlay the entire roadway area with asphalt concrete pavement. Project includes upgrading existing traffic signal systems as well as storm ' drainage improvements. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering.................$500,000 ' Right of Way Acquisition............$1,450,000 Construction ................................$4,300,000 TOTAL........................................$6,250,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S): STP, City of Kent, TIB, LID PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This portion of East Valley Highway cannot accommodate current and proposed traffic volumes that utilize this stretch to access State Route 167 ' and South 212'h Street. The sidewalk system is incomplete. In addition, the existing pavement along this section of 84th Avenue South is showing signs of structural distress as demonstrated by "alligatoring", longitudinal cracking, and cracking of the curbs and gutters. -AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State];CMAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FAST—Freight 3 ' Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor;FMSIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA— Federal Transit Administration[Federal];HES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems [Federal],LID—Local Improvement District;PWTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State];STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal]; TIA—Transportation Improvement Account, TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State];TPP- 1 Transportation Partnership Program[State] CITY OF KENT ' SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1 YEAR: 2009 PROJECT #4: South 228t" Street/Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad Grade Separation Grade Separation crossing at Burlington Northern/Santa Fe Railroad DESCRIPTION: Construct grade separation of the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad mainline tracks at South 228'h Street. The project will include the construction of a road overpass; full-width paving; concrete curbs, gutter, and sidewalks; street lighting; utilities and appurtenances. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering..............$1,700,000 Right of Way Acquisition............$7,000,000 , Construction ..............................$12,300,000 TOTAL......................................$21,000,000 ' FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent, T1B, FAST, FMSiB, Burlington Northern Santa Fe ' Railroad, PWTF PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The project will lead to a seamless connection between major freight handlers and their primary destinations. This project will support freight moving through Kent to the Ports of Seattle and Tacoma, SeaTac Airport and the freeway system. Grade separating the arterial will increase both rail and roadway capacity, decrease congestion, enhance safety, and improve freight mobility in the corridor and throughout the region. This project will provide regional connections between thousands of businesses, employers and 40 million square feet of warehouse/industrial , space. The level of freight and passenger rail traffic on the BNSF Railroad mainline is rising as a consequence of increased traffic in the Puget Sound area, and new Sound Transit and Amtrak service. - -AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State];CMAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal];FAST—Freight 4 Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor;FMSIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA— ' Federal Transit Administration[Federal];HES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems [Federal];LID—Local improvement District;PWTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State];STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal]; TIA—Transportation Improvement Account; TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State];TPP— Transportation Partnership Program[State] ' CITY OF DENT ' SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2009 PROJECT #5: Kent Station Mitigation Projects Wiclen Willis Street at 41h Avenue and Cenlral Avenue at Willis Streel DESCRIPTION: Provide an additional left-turn pocket on eastbound Willis Street to northbound 41h Avenue. Provide a right-tuns pocket southbound on Central Avenue to westbound Willis Street 1 PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering.................$106,000 Right of Way Acquisition...............$500,000 Construction ...................................$500,000 ' TOTAL........................................$1,106,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent, Development Mitigation Funds, WSDOT Overlay Funds ' PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: These projects are traffic mitigation requirements for additional trips generated by the Kent Station development. The City of Kent will be ' implementing these projects required by the developer. - -AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State];CMAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal];FAST—Freight 5 Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor;FMSIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA— Federal Transit Administration[Federal];HES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems [Federal];LID—Local Improvement District;PWTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State];STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal]; TIA—Transportation Improvement Account; TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State]; TPP— Transportation Partnership Program[State] CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2009 PROJECT #6: Smart Growth Initiative , DESCRIPTION: Widen Smith Street to provide a left turn lane from eastbound Smith Street ' onto northbound Lincoln Avenue. The project includes the construction of a new traffic signal at the intersection of Smith and Lincoln as well as ' the reconstruction of existing curb, gutter and sidewalks along Smith Street. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering.................$105,000 , Right of Way Acquisition...............$400,000 Construction ................................$11600,000 ' TOTAL........................................$2,105,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S): STP, City of Kent PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This project will improve traffic flow within the Kent Urban Center and improve access to Kent Station and the downtown business district. The left turn pocket and signal at Smith and Lincoln Streets will facilitate the redevelopment of a portion of King County Metro Transit's Park and ' Ride Lot. - -AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State];CMAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal];FAST—Freight 6 Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor;FMSIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA— , Federal Transit Administration[Federal];HES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems [Federal];LID—Local Improvement District;PWTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State];STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal]; TIA—Transportation Improvement Account; TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State],TPP— Transportation Partnership Program[State] CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2009 PROJECT 97: 72nd Avenue South Extension South 200'1' Street to South 196`i' Street DESCRIPTION: Construct a new four-lane roadway from South 200`t' Street to South 196`h Street. The project will include the crossing of Mill Creek and construction of full-width paving; concrete curbs, gutters, sidewalks, street lighting, storm drainage, landscaping, utilities and appurtenances. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering.................$250,000 Right of Way Acquisition..........................SO 1 Construction ...................................$870,000 TOTAL........................................$1,120,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Continued development in the northern Kent industrial area, and high levels of congestion along West Valley Highway between the South 180`h Street and South 196`h Street corridors, mandate additional north-south arterial capacity. This project provides some relief for South 180`h Street, South 196`h Street, and South 212`1' Street intersections along West Valley Highway. It also provides improved access to the South 196rh Street corridor from industrial development along 72nd Avenue South by constructing the missing link between South 200th Street and South 196'h Street. - -AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State];CAL4Q—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal];FAST—Freight 7 Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor;FMSIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA— Federal Transit Administration[Federal];HES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems [Federal];LID—Local Improvement District;PWTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State];STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal]; TIA—Transportation Improvement Account; TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State]; TPP— Transportation Partnership Program[State] CITY OF KENT ' SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2009 PROJECT #8: Southeast 256`" Street Widening, Phase II ' SR 516 (Kent Kangley Road) to 116`h Avenue Southeast DESCRIPTION: Construct a three lane roadway from SR 516 (Kent Kangley Road) to , 109`' Avenue Southeast and a five lane roadway from 109t" Avenue SE to 1 16"' Avenue SE. This project includes bike lanes on both sides of the roadway. The project will include construction of full-width paving; concrete curbs, gutters, and sidewalks; street lighting; storm drainage; landscaping; utilities; and appurtenances. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering..............$1,000,000 , Right of Way Acquisition............$2,000,000 Construction ................................$6,500,000 TOTAL........................................$9,500,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent, Local Improvement District, TIB PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Southeast 256"' Street is a two-lane roadway with no curbs, gutters or sidewalks and a limited street light system. During peak hours, the roadway cannot accommodate the traffic volumes due to the large number of vehicles blocking the roadway while waiting to turn left into driveways. The widening of Southeast 2561i Street also alleviates traffic on SR 516 (Kent Kangley Road) as the two roads essentially run parallel to each other. The project will increase the capacity of this roadway by adding new general purpose lanes and a center two-way left turn lane. This project will connect the SR 515/SR 516 intersection with the improvements already existing on Southeast 256'I" Street east of 1101' Avenue Southeast and the improvements along 116th Avenue Southeast between Southeast 256it' Street and Kent Kangley Road. - -AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State];CMAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal];FAST—Freight S Action Strategy for Fverett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor;FMSIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA— ' Federal Transit Administration[Federal];HES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems [Federal];LID—Local Improvement District;PWTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State];STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal]; TIA—Transportation Improvement Account; TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State]; TPP— Transportation Partnership Program[State] , CITY OF KENT r SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ' YEAR: 2010 PROJECT #9: South 228th Street Pavement Rehabilitation Lakavide Boulevard to 72'd Avenue South DESCRIPTION: This project will consist of rehabilitating the existing roadway by grinding rough areas, reconstructing failing areas and providing a full width overlay of South 228th Street between Lakeside Boulevard and 72°a Avenue South. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering...................$50,000 Right of Way Acquisition..........................$0 Construction .................................$650,0000 TOTAL...........................................$700,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This road lies in the heart of the City's manufacturing area. Heavy truck traffic means pavement condition on South 228`1' Street has deteriorated significantly. Kent is the second largest warehouse/distribution center on the west coast with over 40 million square feet of industrial space. With the completion of major portions of the 2281h corridor and the anticipated increase in the number of daily truck trips, the pavement will continue to deteriorate at an accelerated rate. This project will maintain a major freight corridor to the ports and protect the City's investment in transportation infrastructure. - -AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State];CMAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal];FAST—Freight 9 Action Strategy for Fverett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor;FMSIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA— Federal Transit Administration[Federal];HES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems [Federal];LID—Local Improvement District;PWTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State];STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal]; TIA—Transportation Improvement Account; TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State]; TPP— Transportation Partnership Program[State] a CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM t YEAR: 2010 , PROJECT #10: Central Avenue South Pavement Rehabilitation Green River Briri'ge to East Willis Street (SR 516) DESCRIPTION: Remove and rehabilitate the existing roadway pavement to add service life to the roadway, between the Green River Bridge and East Willis Street (SR 516). This project will include the removal and replacement of failing pavement sections and a full-width asphalt concrete overlay of the entire roadway. Also included in this project is the selective replacement of curbs, gutters and sidewalks as well as minor storm drainage improvements. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering.................$350,000 Right of Way Acquisition..........................$0 ' Construction ..................................3,500,000 TOTAL........................................$3,850,000 , FUNDING SOURCE(S): STP, City of Kent PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The existing pavement along this section of Central Avenue South is exhibiting signs of distress, as demonstrated by "alligatoring", I longitudinal cracking, and cracking of the curbs and gutters. The service life of this roadway has been reached, necessitating reconstruction of the pavement to extend the sciwice life of the roadway, and prevent further pavement degradation. The sidewalk system is sub-standard in many locations and in need of replacement. - -AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State];CAMQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal];FAST—Freight 10 Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor;FMSIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA— Federal Transit Administration[Federal];HES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems [Federal];LID—Local Improvement District;PWTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State];STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal];TIA—Transportation Improvement Account; TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State];TPP— Transportation Partnership Program[State] CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2011 PROJECT #11: South 224th Street Extension 84"'Avenue South to 104`h Avenue Southeast (Benson Road) (SR 515) DESCRIPTION: Constrict a three-lane road from 84`' Avenue South to 104"' Avenue Southeast (Benson Road) (SR 515), including new bridges over SR 167 and Garrison Creek. The project will include the construction of full- width paving; concrete curbs, gutters and sidewalks; street lighting; storm drainage; landscaping; utilities and appurtenances. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering..............$2,300,000 Right of Way Acquisition............$8,000,000 Construction ..............................S25,700,000 TOTAL......................................$36,000,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent, LID PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The existing roadway system cannot accommodate the current and forecast cast-west traffic volumes between Kent's East Hill and the Green River Valley floor. In order to meet transportation concurrency requirements of the Growth Management Act, additional east-west vehicle capacity is required. Intersections along South 208'1/212`' Street and James/Southeast 2401h Streets are also at or over capacity. it is not feasible to widen the James/Southeast 240`h Street and South 208`h/212" Street `corridors' enough to accommodate forecast traffic volumes without additional east-west capacity because of existing development and topographic constraints. -AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State];CMAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal];FAST—Freight 11 Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Comdor;FMSIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA— Federal Transit Administration[Federal];HES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems [Federal];LID—Local Improvement Distnct;PWTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State];STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal]; TIA—Transportation Improvement Account; TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State]; TPP— Transportation Partnership Program[State] i CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2011 PROJECT #12: Military Road South at Reith Road. Intervection Improvement DESCRIPTION: Widen all approaches of Military Road South at Reith Road intersection to provide exclusive left turn lanes for each approach, and exclusive right turn lanes for northbound and southbound traffic on Military Road South and westbound traffic on Reith Road. Replace the existing traffic signal. The project will include the construction of full width paving, paved shoulders, street lighting, storm drainage, utilities and appurtenances. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering.................$175,000 Right of Way Acquisition...............$200,000 , Construction ................................$1,750,000 TOTAL........................................$2,125,000 , FUNDING SOURCE(S): TIB, City of Kent, Developer Mitigation Funds PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The level of development on the Kent West Hill coupled with the growth in the Puget Sound area and the regularly occurring congestion along both Pacific Highway South and interstate 5 results in significant congestion at this intersection in the morning and evening peak hours. - -AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State];CMAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal];FAST—Freight 12 Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor;FMSIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA— Federal Transit Administration[Federal],HES—Hazard Elimination[Federal),ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems [Federal];LID—Local Improvement District;PWTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State];STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal); TIA—Transportation Improvement Account; TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State]; TPP— Transportation Partnership Program[State] CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2011 PROJECT#13: $01h Avenue South Widening South 196'}`Street to South I881h Street DESCRIPTION: Widen 80`h Avenue South from South 1961h Street to South 188"' Street to five lanes. This will include four general-purpose lanes and a center left- turn lane. The project will also include the construction of full width paving; concrete curbs, gutters, and sidewalks; street lighting; storm drainage; utilities and appurtenances. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering.................$210,000 Right of Way Acquisition...............$430,000 Construction ...................................$785,000 TOTAL........................................$1,425,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent, LID PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The opening of the 196"' Street corridor on the south end of the project and Renton's completion of Oaksdale Avenue South results in 801h Avenue South being a significant north-south corridor serving the industrial area. As a result, the increased traffic volurnes along this section of 80th Avenue South are reaching the point where a consistent five lane roadway section is required to provide safe left turn access into the adjoining properties. Further, concrete curbs and gutters are required to provide control of roadway drainage and to prevent impacts to adjacent property owners. Sidewalks and street lighting will provide safe access for pedestrians. - -AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State];CMAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal];FAST—Freight 13 Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor;FMSIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA— Federal Transit Administration[Federal];HES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems [Federal];LID—Local Improvement District;PWTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State];STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal]; TIA—Transportation Improvement Account, TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State],TPP— Transportation Partnership Program[State] 1 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM , YEAR: 2011 PROJECT #14: Willis Street(SR 516)/Union Pacific Railroad Grade Separation ! Grade Separation Crossing at Union Pacific Railroad(UPRR) DESCRIPTION: Construct grade separation of the Union Pacific Railroad's mainline tracks at Willis Street (SR 516). The project will include the construction of a railroad bridge; a four-lane roadway under-crossing; full width paving; concrete curbs, gutters, and sidewalks; street lighting; utilities and appurtenances. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering..............$5,700,000 Right of Way Acquisition..........................$0 Construction ..............................$23,000,000 , TOTAL......................................$28,700,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent, FAST, FMSIB, Port of Seattle, Port of Tacoma, TIB, Union Pacific Railroad PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This project supports east-west freight and commuter mobility in the Green River Valley. More than 26,000 vehicles per day travel on Willis Street, including over 800 freight-bearing trucks. The level of freight traffic on the UP Railroad mainline is also increasing to approximately 20 trains a day. Grade separations provide the solution to the costly problem of congestion. The railroad crossing will no longer impede freight and , other traffic flow. Reductions in traffic congestion on adjoining streets and reduced environmental impacts caused by traffic congestion are also expected. This project will enhance Kent as an economic generator and provide regional connections for thousands of businesses, employers, and commuters. - -AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State]; CMAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FAST—Freight 14 Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor;FMSIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA— Federal Transit Administration[Federal];HES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems [Federal];LID—Local Improvement District;PWTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State];STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal]; TIA—Transportation Improvement Account; TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State];TPP— Transportation Partnership Program[State] ! CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2011 PROJECT #15: Willis Street (SR 516)/Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad Grade Separation Gracie Separation Crossing at Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad DESCRIPTION: Construct grade separation at the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad mainline tracks at Willis Street (SR 516). The project will include the construction of a railroad bridge; four-lane vehicle under-crossing; full width paving; concrete curbs, gutters, and sidewalks; street lighting; utilities and appurtenances. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineerin...............$4,300,000 Right of Way Acquisition............$4,300,000 Construction ..............................$15,800,000 TOTAL......................................$24,400,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent, Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad, FAST, FMSIB, Port of Seattle, Port of Tacoma, TIB PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This project supports east/west freight and commuter mobility in the Green River Valley. More than 26,000 vehicles per day travel on Willis Street, including over 800 freight-bearing trucks. The level of freight and passenger rail traffic on the BNSF Railroad mainline is also increasing to approximately 45 trains a day. Grade separation provides more efficient movements of goods and provides a solution to the costly problem of congestion. The railroad crossing will no longer impede freight and other traffic flow. Reductions in traffic congestion on adjoining streets and reduced environmental impacts caused by traffic congestion is expected. This project will enhance Kent as an economic generator and provide regional connections for thousands of businesses, employers, and commuters. - -AIP-Artenal Improvement Program[State];CAM Q—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal];FAST—Freight 15 Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Comdor;FMSIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board(State],FTA— Federal Transit Administration[Federal];HES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems [Federal];LID—Local Improvement District;PWTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State];STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal]; TIA—Transportation Improvement Account; TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State]; TPP— Transportation Partnership Program[State] CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2011 PROJECT #16: South 212th Street/Union Pacific Railroad Grade Separation Grade Seq?aration Crossing at Union Pacific Railroad DESCRIPTION: Construct grade separation of the Union Pacific Railroad's mainline tracks at South 212`h Street. The project will include the construction of a railroad bridge; a six-lane roadway under-crossing; full-width paving; concrete curbs, gutters, and sidewalks; street lighting; utilities and appurtenances. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering..............$5,600,000 Right of Way Acquisition............$1,500,000 Construction ..............................$28,500,000 TOTAL......................................$35,600,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent, FAST, Tll3, Union Pacific Railroad PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This project supports east-west freight and commuter mobility in the Green River Valley. Approximately 29,000 vehicles per day travel on South 212`' Street, including nearly 3,500 freight bearing trucks. The level of freight traffic on the UP Railroad mainline is also increasing to approximately 20 trains a day. Grade separations provide the solution to the costly problem of congestion. The railroad crossing will no longer impede freight and other traffic flow. Reductions in traffic congestion on adjoining streets and reduced environmental impacts caused by traffic congestion is also expected. This project will enhance Kent as an economic generator and provide regional connections for thousands of businesses, employers, and commuters. - -AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State];CMAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal];FAST—Freight 16 Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor;FMSIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA— Federal Transit Administration[Federal];HES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems [Federal];LID—Local Improvement District;PWTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State];STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal]; TIA—Transportation Improvement Account; TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State];TPP— Transportation Partnership Program[State] CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2011 PROJECT #17: South 212"' Street/Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad Grade Separation Grade Separation Crossing at Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad DESCRIPTION: Construct grade separation at the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad mainline tracks at South 212"' Street. The project will include the construction of a railroad bridge; six-lane vehicle under crossing; full width paving; concrete curbs, gutters, and sidewalks; street lighting; utilities and appurtenances. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering..............$5,600,000 Right of Way Acquisition............$1,500,000 Construction ..............................$28,500,000 TOTAL......................................$35,600,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent, FAST, TIB, Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This project supports east-west freight and commuter mobility in the Green River Valley. Approximately 29,000 vehicles per day travel on South 212"' Street, including nearly 3,500 freight-bearing trucks. The level of freight and passenger rail traffic on the BNSF Railroad mainline is also increasing to approximately 45 trains a day. Grade separation provides more efficient movement of goods and provides a solution to the costly problem of congestion. The railroad crossing will no longer impede freight and other traffic flow. Reductions in traffic congestion on adjoining streets and reduced environmental impacts caused by traffic congestion is expected. This project will enhance Kent as an economic generator and provide regional connections for thousands of businesses, employers and commuters. - -AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State],CMAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal];FAST—Freight 17 Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Comdor;FMSIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA— Federal Transit Administration[Federal],HES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems [Federal];LID—Local Improvement District;PWTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State];STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal]; TIA—Transportation Improvement Account, TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State];TPP— Transportation Partnership Program[State] CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2011 PROJECT #18: South 228"' Street/Union Pacific Railroad Grade Separation Grade Separation crossing at Union Pacific Railroad DESCRIPTION: Construct grade separation of the Union Pacific Railroad mainline tracks at South 228"' Street. The project will include the construction of an overpass or an underpass road; full-width paving; concrete curbs, gutters and sidewalks; street lighting; utilities and appurtenances. PROJECT COST: Prelitmnai-y Engineering..............$1,800,000 Zn Right of Way Acquisition............$1,200,000 Construction ..............................$23,100,000 TOTAL......................................$26,100,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent, TIB, FAST, FMSIB, Union Pacific Railroad PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The project will lead to a seamless connection between major freight handlers and their primary destinations. This project will support freight moving through Kent to the Ports of Seattle and Tacoma, SeaTac Airport and the freeway system. Grade separating this arterial will increase both rail and roadway capacity, decrease congestion, enhance safety, improve freight mobility in this corridor and throughout the region. This project will provide regional connections for thousands of businesses, employers, and the 40 million square feet of warehouse/industrial space in the valley. - -AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State];CMAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal];FAST—Freight 18 Action Strategy for F verett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor;FMSIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA— Federal Transit Administration[Federal];HES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems [Federal];LID—Local Improvement District;PWTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State],STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal]; TIA—Transportation Improvement Account; TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State]; TPP— Transportation Partnership Program[State] CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2012 PROJECT #19: Southeast 256'h Street and 132"d Avenue Southeast Intersection Improvements DESCRIPTION: Reconstruct the intersection of Southeast 256`h Street and 132"d Avenue Southeast by extending the northbound and southbound left turn pockets to provide additional storage capacity, extend the westbound right turn lane and construct new right turn lanes eastbound and southbound. The project will include signal modifications and minor reconstruction of curb, gutter and sidewalk to accommodate the additional widening. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering.................$340,000 Right of Way Acquisition.................$50,000 Construction ...................................$300,000 TOTAL...........................................$390,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Continued development in the East Hill area of Kent has increased traffic flows through this intersection. The existing configuration of the intersection is not capable of accommodating the current and anticipated traffic flows. Traffic flows have also increased due to the new connection of Southeast 256'h Street to State Route 18 to the cast. This project will supplement the improvements already constructed along Southeast 256'h Street as well as anticipated improvements to Southeast 256`h Street to the east and the improvements anticipated to 132,d Avenue Southeast. - -AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State],CAM—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal];FAST—Freight 19 Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor;FMSIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA— Federal Transit Administration[Federal];HES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems [Federal];LID—Local Improvement District;PWTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State];STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal]; TIA—Transportation Improvement Account; TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State]; TPP— Transportation Partnership Program[State] CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2012 PROJECT#20: Southeast 248t" Street Improvements II6'1'Avenue Southeast to 132"d Avenue Southeast DESCRIPTION: Construct a three lane roadway from 116`' Avenue Southeast to 132`1 , Avenue Southeast which includes the construction of full width paving; bicycle lanes; concrete curbs, gutters, and sidewalks; street lighting; storm drainage; landscaping; utilities and appurtenances. The project includes either a modern roundabout at the 1 16`h Avenue Southeast intersection or a traditional traffic signal. Improvements to vertical roadway geometry for sight distance and safety will also be addressed. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering..............$1,000,000 Right of Way Acquisition...............$300,000 Construction ................................$8,600,000 TOTAL........................................$9,900,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent, LID, Development Mitigation Funds PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Additional capacity is required to accommodate existing development in the East Hill area of the city. This project will provide additional east- west capacity to supplement Southeast 240"' Street to the north, and Southeast 2561' Street to the south. In addition, the southeast corner of Southeast 201' Street and 124`h Avenue Southeast is the future site of the City of Kent's Public Works maintenance facility. - -AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State];CMAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal];FAST—Freight 20 Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor;FMSIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA— , Federal Transit Administration[Federal];HES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems [Federal];LID—Local Improvement District;PWTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State];STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal]; TIA—Transportation Improvement Account; TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State]; TPP— Transportation Partnership Program[State] CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2012 PROJECT #21: 1081h Avenue Southeast Extension Southeast Kent Kangleyy Road(SR 516) to Southeast 256`h Street DESCRIPTION: Construct a new three lane roadway from Southeast Kent Kangley Road (SR 516) to Southeast 2561h Street including rebuilding the traffic signals at the intersection of Southeast Kent Kangley Road and 108`h Avenue Southeast and installing a new traffic signal at the intersection of Southeast 2561h Street and 109`' Avenue Southeast. The project includes right turn lanes northbound on 109`h at Southeast 256`h Street and Southbound on 109t" at Kent Kangley Road. The project will also include construction of full width paving; concrete curbs, gutters and sidewalks; street lighting; storm drainage; landscaping; utilities and appurtenances. As part of this project, the eastbound left-turn lane from Kent Kangley Road to Southeast 256`h Street will be eliminated. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering.................$l 50,000 Right of Way Acquisition............$1,500,000 Construction ................................$1,300,000 TOTAL........................................$2,950,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This project will relieve congestion at the Y intersection of 104`h Avenue Southeast (Benson Highway) (SR 515)/Kent Kangley Road (SR 516)/Southeast 256`h Street by improving the traffic flow along SR 516. It will eliminate the left turn pocket from SR 516 to Southeast 2561h Street and redirect that traffic along SR 516 to 108"' Avenue Southeast. There will be a new left turn pocket constructed for motorists wishing to travel north on 1081h Avenue Southeast to Southeast 256"' Street. By moving these left turning movements further to the east, away from the congested Y intersection, all directions of traffic will be able to flow more efficiently. This extension will also provide another way for East Hill residents to have direct access to the business-by-pass route and better access to the commercial area south of the Kent Kangley Road/104`h Avenue Southeast intersection. - -AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State];CMAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal];FAST—Freight 21 Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor;FMSIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA— Federal Transit Administration[Federal];HES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems [Federal],LID—Local Improvement District;PWTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State];STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal]; TIA—Transportation Improvement Account, TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State];TPP— Transportation Partnership Program[State] CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM , YEAR: 2012 PROJECT#22: I-5/South 272nd Street Interchange Reconstruction, Phase I Improve S. 272 at I-S to acid capacity and prepare South 272"`'street for construction. DESCRIPTION: Phase I would reconstruct South 272"d Street at 1-5to provide additional capacity and prepare the roadway for later completion of a Single-Point Urban Interchange. The improvements would be constructed to match projects on South 272"d Street that would be built between Pacific Highway South(SR 99) and Military Road. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering..............$1,500,000 Right of Way Acquisition...............$500,000 Construction ..............................$12,000,000 TOTAL......................................$14,000,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent, City of Federal Way, King County, STP, Sound Transit, TPP, WSDOT PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The traffic volumes at the interchange have reached the point where reconstruction is required to reduce congestion. Improvements would be designed to be forward compatible with interchange reconstruction. - -AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State];CMAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal];FAST—Freight 22 Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor;FMSIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA— Federal Transit Administration[Federal];HES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems [Federal];LID—Local Improvement District;PWTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State];STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal]; TIA—Transportation Improvement Account; TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State];TPP— Transportation Partnership Program[State] CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 20t4 PROJECT #23: Military Road South Widening South 272"`t Street to Kent-Des Moines Road (State Route 516) DESCRIPTION: This project will widen Military Road from South 272"`i Street to Kent- Des Moines Road adding a center left-turn lane, bicycle lanes, curb, gutter and sidewalk. Also included is the construction of storm drainage improvement and illumination system improvements. (Note: Reith Road, Kent-Des Moines Road and South 272" Street intersections are separate projects and are not included in this project.) PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering..............$1,850,000 Right of Way Acquisition...............$900,000 Construction ..............................S 14,300,000 TOTAL......................................$17,050,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent, Developer, TIB PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The level of development along this section of Military Road South has reached a point where a separate center two-way left turn lane is required. During peak traffic flow hours, the roadway cannot accommodate the traffic volumes due to the large number of vehicles blocking the roadway waiting to make left turns. - -AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State];Ctb1AQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal];FAST—Freight 23 Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor;FMSIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA— Federal Transit Administration[Federal];HES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems [Federal];LID—Local Improvement District;PWTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State];STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal]; TIA—Transportation Improvement Account; TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State]; TPP— Transportation Partnership Program[State] CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2014 PROJECT #24: South 272°d Street Widening, Phase 11 Pacific Highway South to Military Road South DESCRIPTION: Add two HOV lanes and a center left-turn lane from Pacific Highway South (SR 99) to Military Road South. Construction will include full width paving; concrete curb, gutter, and sidewalks; street lighting; storm drainage; utilities; traffic signals; and appurtenances. The project also includes widening the roadway under the I-5 bridges. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering..............$1,650,000 Right of Way Acquisition............$1,620,000 1 Construction ..............................$12,960,000 TOTAL......................................$16,230,000 1 FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent, TIB, Washington State Transportation Partnership Account, Federal, Sound Transit PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Traffic volumes between Pacific Highway South and Military Road South have reached the point where improvements supporting HOV- added capacity are required to reduce congestion at the intersections and reduce backups approaching 1-5. The HOV lanes will provide access to the Star Lake Park and Ride lot and the Redondo Heights Park and Ride lot. Adding HOV lanes and HOV access to 1-5 supports various county, City of Kent and City of Federal Way transportation and transit improvement projects. - -AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State];CMAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal];FAST—Freight 24 Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor;FMSIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA— Federal Transit Administration[Federal];HES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems [Federal];LID—Local Improvement District;PWTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State];STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal]; TIA—Transportation Improvement Account; TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State];TPP— Transportation Partnership Program[State] CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2014 PROJECT #25: SR 181/West Valley Highway/Washington Avenue Widening Meeker Str-eel north to approximately the 218'1' block DESCRIPTION: Widen the existing five lane road to seven lanes to include three lanes in each direction and a center left-turn lane and install a traffic signal at the intersection of West Valley Highway and South 238`h Street. The protect will include the construction of full-width paving; concrete curbs, gutters and sidewalks; street lighting; storin drainage; landscaping; utilities and appurtenances. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering..............$1,100,000 Right of Way Acquisition...................$6,000 Construction .....................................$11,600 TOTAL......................................$18,700,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent, STP, TIB, WSDOT PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: SR 181/West Valley Highway/Washington Avenue is a major north- south route through the City and an important truck route for freight moving between the manufacturing, industrial and warehousing center of the Green River Valley and the regional freight corridors. This route is seven lanes wide both north and south of the project segment. With increasing traffic volumes from the expected growth in both the freight and commute segments, the widening is needed to reduce congestion at intersections and reduce backups approaching SR 167 and South 212`h Street. - -AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State],CAM—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal];FAST—Freight 25 Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor;FMSIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA— Federal Transit Administration[Federal];HES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems [Federal];LID—Local improvement District;PWTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State];STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal]; TIA—Transportation Improvement Account; TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State], TPP— Transportation Partnership Program[State] CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR 2014 PROJECT #26: West Meeker Street Widening—Phase 1 64"'Avenue South to the Green River Bridge DESCRIPTION: Widen West Meeker Street to provide a five lane roadway, including four general purpose travel lanes, a center left-turn lane, bicycle lanes, a pedestrian signal at the Riverbend Golf Course, and modifications to the existing traffic signal system at the intersection of West Meeker Street and Russell Road. The project will include the construction of full-width paving; concrete curbs, gutters and sidewalks; landscaping; street lighting; storm drainage; utilities and appurtenances. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering..............$1,150,000 Right of Way Acquisition............$1,300,000 Construction ................................$4,000,000 TOTAL........................................$6,450,000 FUNDiNG SOURCE(S): City of Kent PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The level of development along this section of Meeker Street has reached the point whereby a consistent five lane roadway segment is required to accommodate through traffic. Existing traffic volumes west of the intersection of 64"' Avenue South indicate the need for a five lane section to accommodate additional development. Sidewalk and bicycle improvements will provide additional incentive to encourage a safe and j attractive walking and biking environment, promote alternative modes of travel, and facilitate access to scenic and recreational facilities. - -AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State];CMAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FAST—Freight 26 Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor;FMSIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA— Federal Transit Administration[Federal];HES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems [Federal];LID—Local Improvement District;PWTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State];STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal];TIA—Transportation Improvement Account; TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State]; TPP— Transportation Partnership Program[State] CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2014 PROJECT #27: West Meeker Street Widening—Phase II Lake Fenwick Road to the east,side of'the Green River DESCRIPTION: Widen West Meeker Street between Lake Fenwick Road and the east side of the Green River Bridge to provide a five lane roadway, including four general purpose travel lanes, a center left-turn lane, and bicycle lanes. Construct a new bridge over the Green River and extend the Eve lane roadway to the West Meeker Street Widening — Phase 1 improvements. Remove the existing traffic signal at West Meeker/SR 516 and construct a new interchange, including new ramps to connect West Meeker and SR 516. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering..............$7,500,000 Right of Way Acquisition............$3,250,000 Construction ..............................$64,800,000 TOTAL......................................$75,550,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent, WSDOT PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Increasing traffic on SR 516 and West Meeker Street has resulted in an overall lowering of the level of service at the existing intersection. A new interchange would reduce delays and allow for unimpeded traffic flow on SR 516. - -AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State];CAM —Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FAST—Freight 27 Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor;FMSIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA— Federal Transit Administration[Federal];HES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems [Federal];LID—Local Improvement District;PWTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State];STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal]; TIA—Transportation Improvement Account; TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State]; TPP— Transportation Partnership Program[State] CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR.: 2014 PROJECT#28: 132 nd Avenue Southeast Widening— Phase 1 Southeast 2881h Street to Kent Kangley Road(SR 516) DESCRIPTION: Widen 132"d Avenue Southeast to provide a five lane roadway, including four general purpose travel lanes, a center left-turn lane, a bicycle facility, and modification of the existing traffic signal system at the intersection of Kent Kangley Road. The project will include the constriction of full width paving, bicycle lanes, concrete curbs, gutters, and sidewalks; street lighting; storm drainage; landscaping; utilities and appurtenances. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering..............$2,000,000 Right of Way Acquisition............$2,500,000 Construction ................................$9,700,000 TOTAL......................................$14,200,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The level of development along this section of 132"d Avenue has already reached the point whereby a consistent five lane roadway section is needed to provide safe left-turn access into adjoining properties and accommodate forecast traffic volumes. The south end of 132"d Avenue Southeast provides alternative access to SR 18. Existing traffic volumes that exceed 20,000 ADT (near the intersection of 132"d Avenue Southeast and Kent Kangley Road) necessitate a five lane section. Sidewalks and bicycle lanes will provide multimodal access to adjacent land uses. - -AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State];CMAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal];FAST—Freight 28 Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor;FMSIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA— Federal Transit Administration[Federal];HES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems [Federal];LID—Local Improvement District;PWTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State];STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal]; TIA—Transportation Improvement Account; TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State];TPP— Transportation Partnership Program[State] CITY OF DENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2014 PROJECT #29: 132"`' Avenue Southeast Widening—Phase Il Kent Kangley Road(SR 516) to Southeast 248`h Street DESCRIPTION: Widen 132"d Avenue Southeast to provide a five lane roadway, including four general purpose travel lanes, a center left-turn lane, and a bicycle facility; modifying the existing traffic sinal systems at the intersections of Kent Kangley Road and Southeast 256t Street. The project will include the construction of full-width paving; bicycle lanes; concrete curbs, gutters and sidewalks, street lighting; storm drainage; utilities; and appurtenances. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering..............$3,700,000 Right of Way Acquisition............$3,000,000 Constriction ..............................$18,000,000 TOTAL......................................$24,700,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The level of development along this section of 132"d Avenue has already reached the point whereby a consistent five land roadway section is needed to provide safe left-turn access into adjoining properties and accommodate forecast traffic volumes. Existing traffic volumes that exceed 20,000 ADT (near the intersection of 132' Avenue southeast and Kent Kangley Road) necessitate a five lane section. Sidewalks and bicycle lanes will provide multimodal access to adjacent land uses. - -AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State];CMAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal];FAST—Freight 29 Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor;FMSIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA— Federal Transit Administration[Federal];MES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems [Federal];LID—Local Improvement District;PWTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State];STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal];TIA—Transportation Improvement Account;TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State];TPP— Transportation Partnership Program[State] CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2014 PROJECT #30: 1321,d Avenue Southeast Widening—Phase III Southeast 2481h Street to Southeast 2361h Street DESCRIPTION: Widen 132nd Avenue Southeast to provide a five lane roadway, including four general purpose travel lanes, a center left-turn lane, and a bicycle facility; modifying the existing traffic signal system at the intersection of Southeast 2401h Street. The project will include the construction of full- width paving; bicycle lanes; concrete curbs, gutters, and sidewalks; street lighting; storm drainage; utilities and appurtenances. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering..............$2,000,000 Right of Way Acquisition...............$860,000 Construction ..............................$10,000,000 TOTAL......................................$12,860,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The level of development along this section of 132r,d Avenue has already reached the point whereby a consistent five lane roadway section is needed to provide safe ]eft-turn access to adjoining properties and accommodate forecast traffic volumes. Sidewalks and bicycle lanes will provide multimodal access to adjacent land uses. - -AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State];CAM—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal];FAST—Freight 30 Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor;FMSIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA— Federal Transit Administration[Federal];HES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems [Federal];LID—Local Improvement District;PWTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State];STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal]; TIA—Transportation Improvement Account;TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State]; TPP— Transportation Partnership Program[State] CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2014 PROJECT #31: Southeast 2561h Street Widening—Phase III 132"`t Avenue Southeast to 148"'Avenue Southeast DESCRIPTION: Widen Southeast 256"' Street to provide a three-lane roadway, including two general-purpose travel lanes, a center left-turn lane, and a bicycle facility, modifying the existing traffic signal systems where appropriate. Construct a new bridge crossing at Soos Creek and elevate Southeast 2561' Street approaches above the 100 year flood plain. The project will include the construction of full-width paving, bicycle lanes, concrete curbs, gutters, and sidewalks; bridge; street lighting; storm drainage; utilities and appurtenances. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering..............$2,900,000 Right of Way Acquisition............$1,100,000 Construction ..............................$14,400,000 TOTAL......................................$18,400,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The level of development along this section of Southeast 256`h Street has already reached the point whereby a consistent three-lane roadway section is required to provide safe left-tune access into adjoining properties and accommodate forecast traffic volumes. With the widening of Southeast 2561h Street, the bridge at the east end of the project would need to be replaced and elevated above the 100 year flood plain. Sidewalks and bicycle lanes will provide safe access for pedestrians and cyclists. The cast end of Southeast 2561h Street provides an alternative access to SR 18. - -AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State];CMAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal];FAST—Freight 31 Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor;FMSIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA— Federal Transit Administration[Federal];HES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems [Federal];LID—Local Improvement District;PWTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State];STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal]; TIA—Transportation Improvement Account;TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State];TPP— Transportation Partnership Program[State] CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2014 PROJECT #32: South 208t" Street Improvements 84"'Avenue South to 7h Way South DESCRIPTION: Rehabilitate the existing pavement to add additional service life to the j roadway from 84`h Avenue South to 96`h Way South. This project will widen the existing roadway to two 14 foot lanes with the addition of concrete curb, gutters, sidewalks, storin drainage and illumination. The project will rebuild failing roadway sections near 93'� Avenue and add a left turn lane from eastbound 2081" Street to northbound 92"`r Avenue South. Retaining walls and guardrails will be added as needed. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering.................$240,000 Right of Way Acquisition...............$135,000 i Construction ................................$2,700,000 TOTAL........................................$3,075,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: South 208th Street between 84th Avenue South and 96"' Way South is a substandard narrow two-lane roadway that connects 84`h Avenue (East Valley Highway) with Southeast 208"' Street. This section of roadway cannot accommodate the existing and anticipated traffic volumes and is experiencing pavement and roadway failures that require repair. Widening of the roadway will necessitate the installation of retaining walls and guardrails. - -AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State];CMAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FAST—Freight 32 Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor;FMSIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA— Federal Transit Administration[Federal];HES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems [Federal];LID—Local Improvement District;PWTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State];STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal];TIA—Transportation Improvement Account; TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State];TPP— Transportation Partnership Program[State] CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2014 PROJECT #33: South 196A/192"a Street Corridor—Phase III 841h Avenue South (East Valley Kighwc v) to 108,h Ar,,enue Southeast (SR 715) DESCRIPTION: Constrict a new five lane roadway from 841h Avenue South (East Valley Highway) to 108th Avenue Southeast (SR 515); including a new bridge over SR 167. Project will include the construction of full-width paving; concrete curb, gutter and sidewalks, street lighting; storm drainage; landscaping; utilities and appurtenances. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering..............$7,100,000 Right of Way Acquisition............$7,100,000 Construction ..............................$34,600,000 TOTAL......................................$48,800,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent, LID, STP, TIB i PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Traffic volumes on existing east-west corridors will exceed the adopted standards if forecasts of economic and residential growth on the East Hill of Kent and jurisdictions to the east of Kent continue as predicted by state and regional planning agencies. Additional roadway capacity must be provided to accommodate this growth within the urban growth boundaries. This project supports GMA policies, helps the City meet its Concurrency Standards, and augments previous investments in this corridor by extending its usefulness as a freight corridor and major east- west connection. - -AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State];CMAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal];FAST—Freight 33 Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor;FMSIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA— Federal Transit Administration[Federal];HES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems [Federal];LID—Local Improvement District;PWTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State];STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal]; TIA—Transportation Improvement Account; TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State]; TPP— Transportation Partnership Program[State] CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2009—2014 PROJECT 434: Transportation Master Plan Ongoing Citywide Program DESCRIPTION: This project consists of a major update of the Transportation Master Plan including near-term and long range planning of the City's transportation system needs. Project costs include consultant contracts from transportation planning, concurrency management, public involvement, travel demand and traffic operations modeling and analysis of potential financing strategies to construct, operate and maintain the City's transportation network. The project includes staff resources, hardware and software to analyze and manage the transportation network and develop implementing legislation and regulations related to the transportation system. Action strategies for monitoring and evaluating the performance of the transportation system will be established. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering..............$1,300,000 Right of Way Acquisition..........................$0 Construction ..............................................$0 TOTAL........................................$1,300,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The City's Transportation Master Plan is more than 20 years old and needs to be brought into compliance with current Growth Management policies and practices as defined in PSRC's Destination 2030, the region's Metropolitan Transportation Plan. The City must be in compliance with all state, county and regional policies in order to be eligible to apply for competitive grants. The City endeavors to maximize transportation efficiency, investigate methods of measuring concuirency that incorporates all modes of travel, better reflects the ways our community is changing, engages the community in discussions about future transportation investments, and investigates various ways of funding our future transportation needs. - -AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State];CAN—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal];FAST—Freight 34 Action Strategy for Fverett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor;FMSIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA— Federal Transit Administration[Federal];HES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems [Federal];LID—Local Improvement District;PWTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State];STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal]; TIA—Transportation Improvement Account;TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State];TPP— Transportation Partnership Program[State] CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2009 - 2014 PROJECT #35: Bicycle Improvements Ongoing Citywide Program DESCRIPTION: Make miscellaneous improvements to the city's bicycle routes as identified in the Nonmotorized Chapter (Chapter 6) of the Transportation Master Plan. Bicycle lanes are part of individual street improvement projects and are shown separately. Their costs (estimated at $38,800,000) are not reflected here. This project is for shared lane re-striping and signing and for the extension of the shared-use path network. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering.............$108,500 Right of Way Acquisition.................$72,500 Construction ...................................$723,500 TOTAL...........................................$904,500 FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The Transportation Master Plan Nonmotorized System study proposed a network of shared-lane routes in a number of transportation corridors to help connect the bicycle system. Lane markings and sign postings can inform motorists and cyclists of those corridors best suited for significant bike use. These shared-lane facilities can provide critical linkages to major cycling activity centers and connections to the shared-use path systems. This project can help achieve the City's goals for improving mobility, reducing vehicle trips, increasing physical exercise, and improving transportation connectedness. - -AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State];CMAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal];FAST—Freight 35 Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor;FMSIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA— Federal Transit Administration[Federal];HES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems [Federal];LID—Local Improvement District;PWTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State];STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal]; TIA—Transportation Improvement Account, TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State];TPP— Transportation Partnership Program[State] CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM l YEAR: 2009 -2014 PROJECT #36: Americans with Disabilities Act Compliance and the Sidewalk System Ongoing Citywide Program DESCRIPTION: Reconstruct and repair existing sidewalks and curb ramps and install new truncated domes and hard-surfaced sidewalks to implement the requirements of the Federal Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) consistent with the findings of the Nonmotorized Chapter (Chapter 6) of the Transportation Master Plan (TMP) and systematically construct new sidewalks as identified in the TMP as Highest/High priorities throughout the City. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering..............$1,720,000 Right of Way Acquisition............$1,150,000 Construction ..............................$11,469,600 TOTAL......................................$14,339,600 FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This project is mandated by Title I1 of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Title 11 requires that a public entity must evaluate its services, programs, policies, and practices to dctennine whether they are in compliance with the nondiscrimination requirements of the ADA. The ADA requires that an ADA Transition Plan be prepared to describe any structural or physical changes required to make programs accessible. The City of Kent has conducted a self evaluation and prepared a Transition Plan including a prioritized list of projects to bring itself into compliance with the Federal ADA regulations. This program begins working on that list of projects to construct and repair the City's sidewalk and street/sidewalk transition zones for accessibility for all citizens and begins to address the pedestrian improvements identified in the Transportation Master Plan. This project can help achieve the City's goals for improving mobility, reducing vehicle trips, increasing physical exercise, and improving transportation connectedness. - -AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State];CMAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal];FAST—Freight 36 Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor;FMSIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA— Federal Transit Administration[Federal];HES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems [Federal];LID—Local Improvement District;PWTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State];STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal];TIA—Transportation Improvement Account; TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State];TPP— Transportation Partnership Program[State] CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2009 - 2014 PROJECT #37: Guardrail and Safety Improvements Ongoing Citywide Program DESCRIPTION: Make miscellaneous guardrail improvements each year to enhance motorist safety. Candidate projects include Frager Road and 100`1' Avenue Southeast (near the 22600 block). Upgrade existing guardrail end- treatments as mandated by State and Federal regulations. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering...................$20,000 Right of Way Acquisition..........................$0 Construction ...................................$175,000 TOTAL...........................................$195,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent, HES PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This project is mandated by compliance with Federal and State regulations and the requirement to eliminate potentially hazardous roadway conditions. - -AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State];CAM—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal];FAST—Freight 37 Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FMSIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA— Federal Transit Administration[Federal];HES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems [Federal],LID—Local Improvement District;PWTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State];STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal];TIA—Transportation Improvement Account;TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State];TPP— Transportation Partnership Program[State] CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2009 -2014 PROJECT #38: Community Based Circulating Shuttles Ongoing Citywide Programs DESCRIPTION: Continue to provide enhanced transit service to meet the needs of the community through the use of fixed-route shuttle service, with demand- responsive routing capabilities. Routes 914/916 serve the Kent Transit Center, Regional Justice Center, Kent City Hall, Green River Community College's Kent campus, and local shopping and medical facilities. The Route 918 shuttle connects the City's manufacturing/industrial center with the regional bus and commuter train services at the Kent Transit Center. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering............................$0 Right of Way Acquisition..........................$0 Construction ...................................$252,000 TOTAL...........................................$252,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent, CMAQ, King County, ITS PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Routes 914/9t6 provide mobility and independence to many of the Cty's seniors and reduce the need for expensive ACCESS service for many wheelchair-lift service trips. Community circulating shuttles encourage the participation of all ages, all economic groups, all physical abilities, and virtually all of our community in everyday civic life without the isolation and pollution of the automobile for every trip. Commuter shuttles enhance the regional transit/train service by providing the vital link from the home to the Transit Center and from the Transit Center to the workplace, encouraging people to leave their vehicles at home, avoiding the cold start impacts to air quality and reducing congestion on local streets. - -AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State];CAM—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal];FAST—Freight 38 Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor;FMSIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA— Federal Transit Administration[Federal];HES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems [Federal];LID—Local Improvement District;PWTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State];STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal];TIA—Transportation Improvement Account; TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State];TPP— Transportation Partnership Program[State] CITY OF KENT ® SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2009 - 2014 PROJECT #39: Transit Now Service Partnership Program Ongoing Citywide Program DESCRIPTION: Tran.vit Now is a voter-approved King County Metro Transit program which provides incentives for local jurisdictions to improve local transit operations by entering into a direct financial partnership with Metro for providing that additional service. Metro will match a partner's contribution on a 2:1 basis. Transit Now requires a minimum contribution from the partner of$100,000 per year for five (5) years to add service on an existing route or$200,000 per year for five (5) years to add a new route. Kent was successful on two proposals, one to add new daily shuttle service through The Lakes and Riverview communities to the Kent Transit Center, and one to increased frequencies on the Route 153 between Kent and Renton. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering..............$2,000,000 Right of Way Acquisition..........................$0 Construction ..............................................$0 TOTAL........................................$2,000,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent, King County, Commute Trip Reduction Program(CTR) Employers PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Transit service (bus & train) between Kent and downtown Seattle is generally competitive with automobile driving during the commute hours. Transit service within Kent and between Kent and its neighboring jurisdictions has serious deficiencies. Due to low frequency, transit is simply not a viable option for travelers who need to make a trip during the midday, commuters working non-traditional shifts, and peak hour commuters who are concerned that there is no safety net service should they need to travel during the midday. These partnership proposals allow us to buy our way into providing additional service to our community that we would not otherwise be able to obtain. - -AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State];CMAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal];FAST—Freight 39 Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor;FMSIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA— Federal Transit Administration[Federal];HES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems [Federal];LID—Local Improvement District;PWTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State];STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal]; TIA—Transportation Improvement Account; TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State];TPP— Transportation Partnership Program[State] i CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON SIX-YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2009 - 2014 • KENT W A S H I N G T O N For more information or additional copies of this document contact: Steve Mullen, Transportation Engineering Manager City of Kent, Public Works, Engineering 220 Fourth Avenue South Kent, WA 98032-5895 (253) 856-5585 smullen(a-ci.kent.wa.us - -AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State];CAM—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal];FAST—Freight 40 Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor;FMSIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA— Federal Transit Administration[Federal];HES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems [Federal];LID—Local Improvement District;PWTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State];STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal]; TIA—Transportation Improvement Account; TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State]; TPP— Transportation Partnership Program[State] Kent City Council Meeting Date October 21, 2008 Category Consent Calendar - 6D 1. SUBJECT: SKYLINE PARK APARTMENTS SEWER EASEMENT SURPLUS AND RELEASE - SET DATE FOR PUBLIC HEARING 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Set November 18, 2008, as the public hearing date to surplus a portion of the sanitary sewer easement for the Skyline Park Apartment property, and to release the encumbering easement from the underlying property owner for fair market value and appraisal costs, subject to final terms and conditions acceptable to the City Attorney and Public Works Director. The Public Works Department has reviewed this request and determined which portions of the easement are not needed by the City. The proposal is to release all unneeded portions at this time. These portions include the property owner's proposed building site. The City will retain sufficient easement for the sewer mains. 3. EXHIBITS: Public Works Memorandum map and easement 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Director (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? Revenue? X Currently in the Budget? Yes No X 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Larry R. Blanchard, Public Works Director KEN T Phone: 253-856-5500 W A S N I N G T O N Fax: 253-856-6500 Address: 220 Fourth Avenue S. Kent, WA 98032-5895 Date: September 22, 2008 To: Chair Debbie Raplee and Public Works Committee Members PW Committee Meeting Date: October 6, 2008 From: Mark Howlett, Design Engineering Manager Through: Larry Blanchard, Public Works Director Subject: Set Public Hearing Date - Skyline Park Apartments Sewer Easement Surplus and Release Motion: Move to recommend Council set November 18, 2008 for the public hearing for the surplus of a portion of the sanitary sewer easement for the Skyline Park Apartment property and to determine by Resolution that the easement is surplus and should be released to the underlying property owner for fair market value and appraisal costs subject to terms and conditions acceptable to the City Attorney and Public Works Director.. Summary: The Skyline Park Apartments is located on the east side of Military Road in the 2215t block. The property owner constructed a City pump station and sanitary sewer lines in conjunction with the development in 1983. They also dedicated a 120 foot wide easement (Recording no. 8306230045) to the City for these facilities across the west side of the property adjacent to Military Road. Currently, in addition to the sewer facilities, the easement contains a driveway and parking lots. The property owner wishes to construct a new building on a portion of the parking area and has asked that the City release the portion of the sewer easement encumbering the proposed building site. No sewer lines exist or are proposed in this area. The original 120 foot wide easement is substantial) more than what is needed for Y our facilities. The Public Works department has reviewed this request and has determined which portions of the easement are not needed by the City. The proposal is to release all unneeded portions at this time. These portions include the property owner's proposed building site. The City will retain sufficient easement for the sewer mains. The goal is to eventually remove this pump station from service. In recent years, a gravity sewer main has been extended near the pump station. An additional extension of approximately 3,000 LF is needed to eliminate the pump station. The recommendation, is to release all of the easement not needed in the future plan for the sewer mains, but to maintain a temporary easement for the pump station area that falls outside of the easement needed for the sewer mains. Once the pump U\PWCommutee\AcnonPage\l0 06 08\Skylme Prk Apts Sewer Easement Property Surplus doe 1 station is eliminated, the temporary easement will no longer be in effect. See the attached map for the location of the existing sewer facilities and easement and recommended easement release area. The easement release area is approximately 28,500 square feet in size. The Public Works Department has obtained an appraisal for the easement release. The opinion of fair market value is $55,000 and the appraisal cost was $3,500. RCW 35.94.040 requires that the City determine, after a public hearing and by resolution of the city council that property originally acquired for public utility purposes is surplus to the City's needs and is not required for providing continued public utility service and should be leased, sold or conveyed. U\PWCommntee\ActronPage\l0 06 08\Skylme Prk Apts Sewer Easement Property Surplus doe w / \O4ulz LF 0 " Q 22122 35TH PLACE SOUTH 5 � SKYLINE PARK H s PUMP STATION S s Q ww U O wLL' " EXISTING 120' SEWER EASEMENT " LEGEND: EASEMENT RELEASE AREA " LAR TEMPORARY EASEMENT SKYLINE PARK KENT T.L. 780970-0005 WArrIr070Y CITY OF KENT SCALE '� m 50' EXHBrr ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DATE SEPTEMBER, 2008 A t t MAIL TO; This space reserved for Recorder's Uce PROPERTY MANAURENT CITY OF KENT U1 ?20 S. Fourth Aren.n Kent, NA 99032 V Attic: carat :mint PROJECT Park Vaiulumintum E A S EM E It i ar ners`i1i pi"' i THiS IN3TRUMENT made .05 _ gQ 44- day of — by and botween Skyllr„slw`L,rt.itvd 1`artecrmhin a partnership, hertinafter called "Grantor", ire: CITY OP KCRT, a municipal corporatia, of Ki,•9 County, State of Washington, hereinafter•:Anvil "0e•anteo J (WITNESSETH): that said Grantors for and ip consideration of nnituai benefits derived by the said Grantee, and other valuable consideration, ew:elot of which is hotnhy acknowledged, ro by these presents grant, bargain, sell. convey, and Confirm forever unto the sai4 Grantee, its successors and/or assigns, a right- aan tart' sewrl and of-way or easement for_ „umn tt ,e with nacessary appurtenances over, through, across and upon the following describes Property situated in King _ County, Washington, more particularly described as foliuusi Refer to 1.0tPlt 110 di:7chvd '•1 acid made d port hervtu. ,,• I� tri h jv ,�i'V� 1✓ S � 1 A� G , A ,r 1'%+wl�CtJI f.ln,{Q1 i11:r�i)l:ir� the seed Srantt:v ahelt have the rig:•t witnvut grivr brstltution of suit or i groceedlr,C at law, at tvw?s as may be netvssar:, t� inter upon Said property for the purposes or canst••uct'ng, rrp.lrir„ maintaining, alt..ring, racoastrxting, Or extemiin) gala _ .'�t� '`•`w.-t U_�_,;, mi.�,_•r or -Aking day connections i therewith, w•thout n-:VNrf,.j a,•j loyal ob::gation e.r liabill:v therefore; 5209-33A iSee Sheet two) ' i Road t •"' «• - .�•�,, ., •• '.'. •rme�lidl•t,..,t,..•tW�r •+wt•..w •t .�+-w� f .Ittr•'. w .a .� w r;� .,. 4-NOV.-y"xe y.t.' +`�..+.s..tA' �• -I. • (Sheet Two) I also ail lands adjoining said easements shell be subject to the temporary use of i necessary oq ipment that may be deemed necessary to accomplish any of the heretofore fi described rights; provided that Such constructing, repairing, maintaining, altering, ; reconstructing, Or extending Of Said snalto ry sewer and ultmn stntivn shall be accomplished in such a manner that the private tmorovements existing in this right-ef-way shall not be disturbed or .lestroyed, or in the event they are disturbed or destroyed, they will be replaced in as good f condition as they were fmoupilatoly before the property was entered upon by the Grantee. i Thu Grantor shall retafa the right to use the surface of said easement so long as said use does not interfere with the installation and maintenance of the annitnry sewer and tluma qjajlyu and so long as no pelmanont buildings, Structures, fences, walks or improvements are erected on said easement. Also, there shall be no planting and/or placement of trees within said right-of-tray. This easement shall be a covenant running with the land forever and shall be binding un the Grantor's successors, heirs, and assigns• Sls�1._.s �._,. xfak w r ev:.r.r • ..._ BY: STATE OF WASHINGTON) SS COUNTY Of KING ) 1 On this _ ^10P, day of 19 -'J'A ^, before me, the IF unoersigned, a Notary public ' n' n and for �+teto of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn personally appeared -„_;�-,_ , {}—' I and _ _ to the known to be the general partnert"of ��t� i',r1•-r, a 1 00 ., ,cam partnership. THE gonoraT partnors that e,ecuted the foregoing instrument and acknowledged the sold Instrument to be the free and voluntary act and dead of said partnership, and for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that (�� was/w*m authorized to execute the said instrument on behalf of said partnership. MITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above i wri ttenj*•'•'- I f � nd T o ary�tuDI c n a or tho 'Sta'Fe of }i Washington, residing at &#,Lt4e-w kv r I • ._�• ".7a:"` ',���».. .4- 4 ,•. .. t.r. t: •+ram' C '17m Nestrrl} 110,or fret of the folloaiug described ..:"pony lylug adjacent to and lasterty of the I.JCI a,Wln of Mlittur) Wild South not the Night-of-Kuy now cAtats, more partteularly described as cam!' foi lows: t A portion of the Sottthvest quarter or the Sou+huesl quarter of Sectian IU, Township 22 South. Range •1 t,ast, h.M., to king Count:-, Washington, described as follows: . ' I Commencing at the Swttht.est t.ornrr of mold section thence N 8Uo 31108" 6, along the South line of said 8ocllon 440.89' to a Iwint on the liastsrly mcvitin of Military Ruad as ha,d out And rAtobllsed, thence N tit 45'tt:" L, ailing bald (:astrrly margin 15U.t.1' to the True Point of 8oglnulug. 7hcttce U 8041'2v.. ;. 430.4i': thence N 01"45'29" 1', 11.u41; thence N 8 1 9 0114" I, 440.451; thence N O0oS2'18" I:, ee7.59'; thenc.• 1, 89 4n114" K, 5/7,30' to the centerline of 34th Avenue South; thence tiong said centerline IBe 1 fallowing brnringN and a1Ntn:;Crs; S Ul°45'29" h, 175.�1'; 4 25 lt,'46" h, 21t).Su', S 01 48':9" K, 2110.01; thence S 8U 41'25" Is , 4311.41' to she aforementlottetl easterly margin of Military Rond, thence S 01 45.29" N, along Bald Laaterly margill, 29b.03' to the True Point of beginning. Also known as Lots 15. In, 1 . 28. :9, .lu. 11. 32, 33, 14 and a ' In.rilnt of i.ots 14 and 16. Richards Grand View Acre Tracts an ua- I recorded plat..,, i 1 !I t I i P. .A `•sal= �w!wt..fi%w$:•...... i' t- f c:l,t•' tt Y 'f•• •e.►1;.. t Kent City Council Meeting Date October 21, 2008 Category Consent Calendar - 6E 1. SUBJECT: WEATHERLY INN/LAKE MERIDIAN OUTLET PROJECT EASEMENT - AUTHORIZE 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Authorize the Mayor to sign all documents necessary for the acquisition of necessary right-of-way and environmental easement from Weatherly Inn-Kent LLC in the amount of $130, for the Lake Meridian Outlet Project, subject to final terms and conditions acceptable to the City Attorney and Public Works Director. The Lake Meridian Outlet Project is included in the Green Duwamish Ecosystem Restoration Program list of projects. The easement was appraised at a value of $130 and includes the easement area and associated buffers of improvements and potential re-classification of the wetland. 3. EXHIBITS: Public Works Memorandum, map, and final agreement for right-of- way acquisition 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Director (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? X Revenue? Currently in the Budget? Yes X No 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Larry R. Blanchard, Public Works Director Phone: 253-856 5500 • Fax: 253-856-6500 KENT WASHINGTON Address: 220 Fourth Avenue S. Kent, WA 98032-5895 Date: September 24, 2008 To: Chair Debbie Raplee and Public Works Committee Members PW Committee Meeting Date: October 6, 2008 From: Mike Mactutis, P.E., Environmental Engineering Manager Through: Larry Blanchard, Public Works Director Subject: Easement-Weatherly Inn/Lake Meridian Outlet Project Motion: Move to recommend authorizing the Mayor to sign the right-of-way acquisition for the Weatherly Inn-Kent LLC easement in the amount of$130.00 for the Lake Meridian Outlet Project subject to terms and conditions acceptable to the City Attorney and Public Works Director. Summary: The Lake Meridian Outlet Project is included in the Green Duwamish Ecosystem Restoration Program list of projects. Phase 1 was constructed in 2006-2007. Phase 2, which will include a new stream channel from Lake Meridian Outlet to Big Soos Creek, is now in position to receive cost-sharing in 2008 with construction taking place in 2009. Phase 3 construction, which is the final phase of the project, will include the mitigation of wetlands, and a flow splitter to distribute the flow between the existing and new constructed channel. Acquisition of the Weatherly Inn - Kent LLC property easement is needed for Phase 3 of the Lake Meridian Outlet Project. This acquisition will provide the City and USACE access to a specified easement on the Weatherly Inn Kent LLC property for the Lake Meridian Outlet Project. Budget: The easement was appraised at a value of $130.00 and includes the easement area and associated buffers of improvements and potential re-classification of the wetland. f U\PWCommn1eeWcn0nPage\I0 O6 08 Lk Mendian Outlet Prof Weatherly Easement doc IL R/W -- ---� �`--- KENT—KANGLEY RD. (SR 516) (S.E. 272N ST) - - - - - SECTION LINE - —�---- r------------- R/W --- ---� /�-- 'rn:E m N jw�o _ Z .A Z p a'z--- D *IV I or'' I? [ I� I Ln I tin M 1. r tv N ra L � N ° � (� o U z � Ircspr �m f fTl a Z 04� BI V j oI W Z �Ooe I z � z I rrnn W °' i N o ul I © I z0) .GN' o" ' o I I [ r m �'o_ S88'44'20"E q cr w 68.00' I I �Tl AREA-- —' II 5,031 SF. g {TI EMSnNG SENSINVE 0.12 ACRES --- S. -- AREA ES!!T v UNE OF N __ G.,� 0 w N88'44'20'W I vcS 93.19' i 1_ `NO it RZ E4 V ---- -- -- n Z o ----------- ` ~ v I � \ m xo Ifs I z � i o, ( I EXHIBIT "C" Page 2 of 2 FINAL AGREEMENT FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION July 11, 2008 ' Alex Bunn, Operations Manager Weatherly Inn-Kent, L.L.C. 606 Columbia St.NW Suite#105 Olympia, WA 98501 RE: 15101 Kent-Kangley Road,Kent, WA Tax Parcel#352205-9123 —Lake Meridian Outlet Project#596310-6 Dear Mr. Bunn: This letter is to acknowledge settlement of the right-of-way acquisition from the above- referenced parcel, upon the receipt of the properly executed Offer to Purchase, Environmental Easement,Vendor Set-up Form and Vendor Form, and includes the following terms: 1. The City will pay the sum of $130.00, as per the Offer to Purchase presented to the owners via mail on February 4, 2008, a copy of which is attached. 2. The City assures that all existing structures, walkways, driveways, parking lots, etc., as shown on Aerial Exhibit E (Flown May, 2006, printed 6/19/08), and shown on the attached nine pages of photographs, which lie within the new required setback area mandated by the subject Environmental Easement, will be "grandfathered in" and recognized as legally non-conforming permissible uses. 3. The parties agree to the foregoing as all the terms for full, complete and final settlement of the above-referenced acquisition. Agreed to and Accepted: Weatherly Inn—Ken, L.L.C., a Washington Limited Liability Company BY: IT'S: Anne Rittenhouse Suzette Cooke Right-of-Way Agent for City of Kent Mayor City of Kent J That portion of the north 500.00 feet of the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 35, Township 22 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of said Section 35: thence S88°44'20"E ' along the north line thereof, 863.43 feet to the west line of the east 450.00 feet of said northwest quarter of the northwest quarter; thence S00°51'24'W, along said west line, 500.01.feet to the south line of the north 500.00 feet of said subdivision and the southwest corner of Lot 1, King County Short Plat 880081 as recorded under King County Recording Number 8012300795; thence N00°51'24"E along .the west line of said Lot 1, a distance of 34.17 feet; thence N88°43'42"E 28.78 feet; thence N81 032'50"E 49.25 feet; thence S71"41'29"E 32.58 feet; thence N88003'32"E 48.44 feet; thence S73052'20"E 41.92 feet; thence S60"39'44"E 28.00 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence N23°07'13"E 36.43 feet; thence N16*57'51"E 23.73 feet to the west line of that certain tract of land described in King County Superior Court Cause Number 92-2-24214-1; thence S01"15'40"W 7.63 feet to an angle point in said west line; thence S88°44'20"E 68.00 feet;thence S01°15'40"W 62.00 feet to the south line of the north 500.00 feet of said subdivision; thence N88°44'20'W, along said south line, 93.19 feet to a point which bears S 23°07'13"W from the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence N23°07'13"E 13.98 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. uu•:7f"p..�•• O /y 44ppv �� �d0 �o a�a((,t •.� '• fit'oo u,u . a sPro . G ^^: 8a PB°e¢/�YAL L Sri agB fit EXHIBIT "C" , Page. I of 2 1 A•_ h Ft,�y,,,�,��t�S���y_,. r•' "'I V{�w w�e,t,,,�„�y. v�"a `�I',' � n.�'�}��. A�-:;'<. �`v�'�� ,, — "�_ i re" �ti��a"y.�� =yam '� '�^�'",^v. �e�;,"�Y�",•�.,'p;,��!!'��,,��"- I y , •. ,e4 s'"p,n w "4�.,b, �.�. '� . W� nt�� � y� f �'i�..1�,1�•�ywv`., s�,�^",N' '' II,. _ ?iM1 �'• � M Y�'@Y.__y ���'A` � ,. ' ffJ* "4�y`ils�,� A +�44 3�l.M' $� � �-_•—,w —��% ��=�a .. y � -%`�� "" ='•u �'•q4*' ,S�s,x*yti Sys _4-, '�J,}�- ,.e. _� „ �' .;6, �f (,1�i x. q ^ ��I.,A� :. P,-.. 11,'?I• 'N — �4�.� Ak I �4 Outlet Project#596310-6 Weatherl Ina.-r Kent,L.L.C.: , City of Kent, a Meridian Uu _ 1 - y • - Subjeet Property Ph©tos,.July 11, 2008 - Page 1 of 9,' _ 14, -Y WPM 7- ,`�'F`art '�dJ v�±�N' IF' � 'I I,-I G7:n�j:', b'rY.�',A .._`:.h F'''M,�jiy r •,� , , - 'r� ., . i �, r , . - , _, ., -_ ,'WA�V}"'''�,r , AL It I 7, A tr ........... �Cit�of Kent,Lake,Meridian Outlet Project#596310-6 Weatherly Itip'—Kent, L.L.C. July 11,�2008 Page 2 of 9 Subject Property Photos, Slill'4 �'- 'J''�V��;¢",�i' YE"�'rB'y :'.,:^Ya�'s., 'yad�f" 4 ¢'3" y` �- :Y. E 'r'A 1 �.+�' �•r J. �� , °' �s.jµr; �r" ii ] "44i•�� _,.�' ;ii tt �d r.T � � fir` '_�`•`Jh z' JK `f' '+tiuY H°Y'��,y'r p' •u,i.r � � S''• '��r r ,„ y ,a.a ;. -,� ,,,� •� --:Kent,L.L:C. - "_A7 r ?c-`'' r _ rx•A' y,y°pR'i. , i P*63,pl 7 5u P A yl. �1 y u, yP^Fx .'il:,_ +.,ca I .�''q.•-y`�AnfiM�'�. �a^�"(�d r}�H1n�i '_M1 ?,- '� �s r ,y..y��S5 '�.�.t��-�ry.FAi, C� ak its li dl I i �st�i�� lify� II III IdF-` l�ij� 1 1 j - VIT 'f t N�,�j (5 1 �I 1 11 MJ> - '7YLl�IY J + � wl t d J:F ...... IY Li ° 4w"a,^ � Y � 'I"�('Y� -•a r r w -, T_ `,� � � i.�, 1 �r I Jt , f � _ 1 i . qy I��i Iq i 4 y � . u y ,�. M M _ Y Y r n,� '� Y�.i r•i, , :d. '�d.:l't���•;' `��Y' 'V"*rl�'`?w^'lv', r �",Y .M'° ,�3;'` t y_ �",•'t^:ltF"e�'i:��-fir," s,,•i,�;{.'.,.".f���y('..�'„' .M`k w�nb' _ _ �i�.. aY k.6ch,".a �•.�` d �`"�'.^"Yt.'iy'•'L/y,fn+!'.+�"�'^�'f:/:.,'.. ^ `1' .Gyc �L,+:7 a., �3��' .y ,�li y,C`� �•j n i±' �t4 �; ".ch1, �(.LSC y�' '� i��� _�'i' �6�`Ty e�-�,F;��o��`•x' `h•'�' `�;Yye •o' 4�."a. si i. �",v+� _{�. Y: �,� ,`rm"La. 1.. rays" - •��; _`,v�,-_' y,1 '�• to �4�.e� _d.g»,�f.'�py�','' .�'j nos' _A�7�">+".i•'a '+ r �tr�^",�y._ '�kj' T7`t., .ds�'.4;J��,-;r�,;gr'r�rty�Y';•;�� (= � d�� ' � ,,° += x•" .� r}r' F'` Yam• -J. F'l. •"'�.y'' :_ :. ` • _ _[,:t, ��4•^,�,'1'1'` 4 oni ..et `if}'tii y�,",'yr�t'° r��"�`, ..7 c �`� I k.a`-• ${„f+r�• - - m�h�'• -*.a�"�j,���::ue� V_Za:.�..1 1'1<.�.r'.`a ''�=i •rV' ,r '�- - / ,/�. ,P� iLL*,`,�."-;7:��j I. it it � ��}+� Y � '.- '.`rt � - .�j •/// �'" �:• R.•.;r t`V+ 'qa+•'.fin' ,S'_- �/y' a H'd a•.1'4 N f n• t Mgr •_.-.max � �-�;��r�:^`''" .» hP s 5 < Cityof Kent Lake Meridian Outlet Project#596310-6 Weatherly Inn Kent, L.L.C. Subject Property Photos,July 11, 2008 Page 5 of 9 1 r.• 4, JN ,�;;"- .".�e`>.,4y "nsn LQ s 4' ii,`F'fl �, ,�"'i"+ i` fb�',3 •.�` �.� ':Q'ny mime �� �.. ', �y' "k A~ � 7'Y `y+y,9•�.�,.b k x g� ;•"•�'Ir,•11•7.',° U,,•i'p":rarypn,. • .' �d�y�trr._1M��'tF' ; _�i. Zvi ,' lip P` n w ROB ,. i'i 1'Jlry. fir i rf 1' was . f y^;��f''4a��.�lh�r p �i"�,.'r"?';,'.-7 r.y,f.„"*���f•I,.J 4 p,ry ann�,W' eY a�r',{PP@f ,T ..�;}�l _•... 61 y7 - ..rho x"�+. � �•a ..1 Syr� - �1 Y 1 � -anti-•• ' .q•, I4vv YJ iy -,Me ian Outletroject#596 P' $`Heatherly Inn—Kent, L.L.C. ' o L 9, uiy ff, *8 � `;- Page 6 of 9 pwl''� - s , �,zcc.a, �T v _ ��'sk�y•� . '�_x,'i, ��'y" as%, �,�' �,� �-n ���,' rr"C$.' "y. �,I,%I k,� 'r•_;.a:•�,�j�^fy'�,;�n'v'`yg -' JR ate,` ST lo 34 41, ��r N�Ili iW�iw[�i�;: • S I iyn. %�_^e '! f tsar'• A"� r°� Y:';�;.:��<`r��o�•�'*' �; a• ,ter ;" � 3. r r.t y r y ,,•„fix fay � � ��q,,'` �r �. '•. Wit;; .rftdftlM q Y 7 `SdrJ,y4Ei.)i1� 'LeF" "" •r„� r ('�' fJ •A`1,+r rf{P I;. qt.�y y, v.�J��^ y�i�y;%�'. ram° �wjk ��,f ��l--S�.a:M:'�iT 1.}i� b'•"��yy'SF Y'.�;�•��'•~"'� '~ tlet Project#596310-6 Weatherly Inn—Kent, L.L.C. ''_ t _ •�_ n- ., t ,, ice ' 1,'�008 Page 7 of 9 7- , �w�At Y�'wFl 7 u ` Ill �w u � x ! I fpr Stiff t 4 4A R�tl�"�1 , r 14�r'"a ! 1 y�uy y, t' �,♦ 4 t "1y�'yC � 1 q 73 1 k I t 1 tl!I F I t '1 3 �l I 11 1 w, F� io,� - cam. fi' ��-1+e�r;H� �;n."y's''��'h,`'; v' �r;�Fsk' '•'1:",r:' I- i'r• '�'r s��'p1&�•; It �� ' NN ,3 r�k 4�,��i�t� !.q�•.�'� .r':�'r�.�, >:�� ,, . 'F'? _ ��'" _ ",;,,.per i' � '', h , xix/%�aa ,��• - Ln�AG Jk��}%�•`-�� _. n' •�r4n�W .k Yv_� 4.�'rYr���M1' ;a�',tt �. -"l. ap d,�Vy,*��p�'� I`s."•Y,IS��u�!}if:�� '�,�r I , 3��1� , +"�!+`^�b��•=��r yip!v'�}•pyry��'7 , �� u, , ,wlr• - � " • wJ, et. City of Kent,Lake'Mdridian outl Pro'ect#596310-6 J Weatherly.l=—Kent, L.L-.C. Subject Property Photbs, July 1l 200_& gage 9of9 PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION Larry R. Blanchard Public Works Director 400 West Gowe ENT WA9 MINO70N Kent,WA 98032 Fax: 253-856-6500 ' PHONE: 253-856-5500 OFFER TO PURCHASE J PARCEL # PROJECT: �-� �'1�rrc'ai✓ Qu Ile f ,r,. c/ As you may know, the City of Kent intends to install improvements within your area, and a portion of your property is needed for this purpose in order to install and construct these improvements. Through a qualified independent appraisal firm, an appraisal of that portion of I your property that will be affected by these improvements has been made. Based on this appraisal, the undersigned negotiator is authorized to offer the sum of $ f 130 e o as total just compensation in consideration of you ' and others who may have a record interest in your property executing the appropriate easements, deed and/or releases. A breakdown of this offer is attached and considered a part hereto. ' Should you choose to execute these documents then every effort will. be made to expedite payment so this transaction may be closed as soon as possible. Very truly Yours, Receipt of Letter and Attachment Date Cn Property Negotiator Owner (Signature does not constitute acceptance of this offer) 3 C MAYOR SUZETTE COOKS t s—<^ - � -�---�•= - - ,ao�>Lsa• c-zsxa :r: .:^r r ^.+. �- City of Kent Public Works Department ' PiPM IaryFolmsO fra mPmcl�se-raisr�doe s Parcel 096310-Lake Meridian Outlet Project Owner:Weatherly Inn-Kent,L.L.C. Job#7029-Appraiser-Donald Melton r BREAKDOWN OF ACQUISITION FEE ACQUISITION: There is no fee acquisition by the City of Kent. IMPROVEMENTS: No compensation is indicated. It is your appraiser's opinion that because the subject is unimproved and covered with native vegetation, there is no significant or measurable value to the native vegetation located within the acquisition area. There are no other known site improvements or fixtures. ENVIRONMENTAL EASEMENT: The City of Kent wishes to acquire certain property rights for the Lake Meridian Outlet(Cow Creek) Realignment Project,which is part ofthe greater Green Duwamish River Ecosystem Restoration Project. The subject property rights to be acquired are defined as follows: Environmental Easement: A total of 5,031 s.f is being acquired for the Lake Meridian Outlet(Cow Creek)Realignment Project,which is part of the greater Green Duwamish River Ecosystem Restoration Project. The proposed Environmental Easement area is irregular in shape;please refer to the attached maps for more detailed information. It is covered with a variety of native vegetation including multiple species of trees, brush, weeds, grasses and vegetation compatible with wetlands. This area will be relandscaped with a variety of plants,and trees(Oregon ash),and shrubs(Pacific willow,Sitka willow, red osier dogwood). The Environmental Easement assigns a perpetual and assignable right and easement in, on, over, and across the lands defined in the legal description to construct,operate,maintain,repair,alter,rehabilitate, remove, replace, and monitor features of the Green Duwamish River Ecosystem Restoration Project ' including: channel features,vegetative plantings;modifications and improvements within and adjacent to the channel or shore for grade control,or bank stabilization purposes;fish and wildlife habitat or other ecosystem restoration improvements; placement of materials or structures in the bed, banks, or shorelines that influence stream velocity or channel form; removal or placement of gravels, cobbles, boulders, woody debris, and other structures or conveyances to recharge or maintain flow to existing wetlands; together with the right to remove structures-or obstructions including levees; reserving, however,to the owners,their heirs and assigns,all other rights and privileges that may be used without interfering with or abridging the enumerated rights and easement hereby conveyed and acquired; all subject to existing easements for public roads and highways,public utilities,railroads and pipelines. Grantee(City of Kent)shall also have the right to use the Easement Area for ingress and egress to access real property described(see Addenda). The easement agreement runs with the land and it is binding on all future owners of the easement area. It is my understanding that the City of Kent is responsible for maintaining and monitoring all improvements installed pursuant to this easement and that the owner cannot use the easement area in any manner which might interfere with or damage the wetlands or streams and cannot limit or restrict reasbnable access to the easement area for purposes of enhancement,maintenance or restoration. The Eastman Company 26 Parcel#596310-Lake Meridian Outlet Project Owner. Weatherly Inn-Kent,L.L.C. Job#7029-Appraiser-Donald Melton r An easement restricts,but does not abridge, the rights of the fee owner to use and enjoyment of the easement holder's rights except as defined in the easement. The ownership of real estate is endowed with a bundle of rights,which may be held by one party or a number of parties. In this appraisal the appraiser has been hired to estimate the value of the bundle of rights being sold to the City of Kent as defined by the Environmental Easement. The appraiser has been actively involved in the appraisal of t easements,both surface and subsurface,short term and permanent,specialty and preservation easements, for over 25 years. Based on this experience(and education)it has been observed that as the severity of the impact on alternative uses of the property increases the value in the remaining"bundle of rights" decreases. In general,when the impact of the easement is minimal there is little change or decrease in the value of the property. As the loss of the bundle of rights increases so does the loss in value of , property. It is your appraiser's opinion that this Environmental Easement,as previously described,will result in the loss of most of the bundle of rights inherent in the ownership of real estate, which in my judgement represents a loss of about 54%. This-represents the percentage change between the"Before" value of $.0477 per s.f. and the "After" value of.$.0258 per s.f. The compensation due for the Environmental Easement is the difference between these two numbers ($.0477- $.0219 =$.0258 per s.f.) times the area of the proposed easement or $130 (5,031 s.f. x $.0258 = $129.80, rounded to $130.00). REMARKS AND ITEMIZED DAMAGES: Items of damage are normally itemized and explained in this section. It is my opinion that there are no damages to the subject as a result of the proposed acquisition. SPECIAL BENEFITS: , Special benefits are defined as the specific(not general)benefits that accrue to property remaining after a partial acquisition, which in this case is the acquisition of the proposed Environmental Easement. General benefits are defined as the benefits that accrue to the community at large, to the area adjacent to the improvements,or to other property situated near the property taken. It is your appraiser's opinion that there are no special benefits, as a result of the Lake Meridian Outlet (Cow Creek) Realignment ' Project,which is part of the greater Green Duwamish River Ecosystem Restoration Project,that accrue solely to the subject property. SUMMARY OF ACQUISITION: Fee Simple Acquisition $ 0 Site Improvements $ 0 Environmental Easement $ 130 Plus: Damages $ 0 Less: Special Benefits ($ 0) Total $ 130 a The Eastman Company 27 , Kent City Council Meeting Date October 21, 2008 Category Consent Calendar - 6F 1. SUBJECT: SOUTH 228TH STREET CORRIDOR, SOUTH 231ST WAY, MILITARY ROAD TO 64TH AVENUE SOUTH (HILL CLIMB) - ACCEPT AS COMPLETE 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Accept the South 228th Street Corridor, South 231st Way, Military Road to 64th Avenue South (Hill Climb) Project as complete and release retainage to Scarsella Brothers, upon receipt of standard releases from the state and release of any liens. The original contract amount was $5,128,001.10. The final contract amount was $4,935,476.01. 3. EXHIBITS: None 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Director (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? X Revenue? Currently in the Budget? Yes X No 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Kent City Council Meeting Date ^October 21, 2008 Category Consent Calendar - 6G 1. SUBJECT: BILL OF SALE, LEE SHORT PLAT - ACCEPT 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Accept the Bill of Sale for the Lee Short Plat for 373 linear feet of watermain, 3 valves, 1 hydrant, 384 linear feet of sanitary sewer, 2 manholes, 443 linear feet of streets, 402 linear feet of storm sewer lines, 1 manhole, 25 catch basins, and 14,384 cubic feet of detention pond storage. The project is located at 11215 SE 244th Street. 3. EXHIBITS: Bill of Sale 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Director (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? N/A Revenue? N/A Currently in the Budget? Yes No 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: 400 KEN TT W A S H I N G T O N MAIL TO: ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AT TN: 220 4 AVENUE SOUTH NEW,WAMINGTON 99M2 PROJECT: ��' 5i1h LOCATION* TAX ACCT NO• BII.L OF SALE CITY OF KENT IMG COUNTY,WASEU NGTON TMs rNSTRUMENT made this day al A _..._20 0 e and inetween swidf hereinafter called'"Grantors",and City of Kent,a municipal corporation of King County,State of Washington,hereinafter called"Grantee": WITNESSETH: That the said Grantors for a valuable consideration,does hereby grant,bargain,sell to Grantee the following described improvements: A. WATERMAM together with a total of 7itr 3 gate valves at each,viv i hydrants at$ ljoo each and/or any other appurtenances thereto. ON /1 Z'0 PG. S" FROM ,S.L' Z Yy TO !r A/v o t" (street,esmt,etc) ' Including 3 3 linear feet at S ZS per LF of b (size&type) D.L waterline. B. S TTTI' RY SF MMA-. Together with a total of Two Cz,L manholes at S ZiSO6 each and/or any other appurtenances thereto. 1 of4 Bill of Sale STATE OF WASMNGTON ) )SS COUNTY OF K@IG ) day of 20 $ before m the On this y e, undersigned A Notary Public in and f�eM pf Washington,duly commissioned and sworn,Personally appeared ,�1 to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument,and acknowledged to me that helshe signed and sealed this instrument as his/her free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN under my hand and official seal this MI- day of AkAU6+ 20Q& N4#ary Public m sub for the S to of Washington,residing at E tNO rum of� My Commission Expires: The Bill of Sale is given and accepted pursuant to a motion duly made,seconded,and passed by the City Council of the City of Kent,King County,Washington,on the day of ,20 3 of 4 Bill of Sale ADDENDUM TO BILL OF SALE CITY OF KENT The figures used on the Bill of Sale for E' SXo.er l�.lsF T project dated 7 OD 7 were based on the"As-Built"Engineering Plans dated Ju Iy 2Y, moo S .for the same said project. AL ex- -wegx -S, the undersigned P.E.or land surveyor is the person responsible for the preparation of the Bill of Sale and is an employee of 4&Y__ I-1 a� orcr t-.- !Pain Z',z c. ,the firm responsible for the preparation of the"As-Built"Engineering DrawingL Spo re �� 28352 14NAL� CXPIRES 0 �� 4 of 4 Bill of Sale Kent City Council Meeting Date October 21, 2008 Category Consent Calendar - 6H 1. SUBJECT: BILL OF SALE, ROYTBERG SHORT PLAT - ACCEPT 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Accept the Bill of Sale for Roytberg Short Plat for 375 linear feet of streets, 576 linear feet of storm sewer, 1 storm manhole, 9 catch basins, and 13,665 cubic feet of detention pond storage. This project is located at 13806 SE 272nd Street. . EXHIBITS: Bill of S I 3Sale 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Director (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? N/A Revenue? N/A Currently in the Budget? Yes No 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds 1 DISCUSSION: ACTION: i KENT WASHINGTON MAIL TO: ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ATTN: 220 4 AVENUE SOUTH KENT,WASHINGTON 98032 PROJECT: Ro4f.ho-Ci SLrt W, 1 LOCATION: TAX ACCT NO: IBILL OF SALE CITY OF KENT KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON THIS INSTRUMEN1made this T I day of OvQ 20 7 ,by and between l o Ave G. . t_U. hereinafter called"Grantors",and City of Kent,a municipal corporation of King County,State of Washington,hereinafter called"Grantee": WITNESSETH: That the said Grantors for a valuable consideration,does hereby grant,bargain,sell to Grantee the following described improvements: A. WATERMAiNS: together with a total of gate valves at$ t r each, hydrants at$ each and/or any other �1 ( appurtenances thereto. ON FROM TQ (street,esmt,etc) Including linear feet at$ per LF of (size&type) waterline. lv . SAMM RY MUM M Together with a total of manholes at each and/or any PP other appurtenances thereto. 1 of4 Bill of Sale OM TO l (street,esmt,etc) Including linear feet at S per LF of (size&type) sewer line. C. S33FXM Together with curbs,gutters,sidewalks,and/or any other appurtenances thereto. ON FROM TO F30 040 !v3p� sEl KK R )LL Lour' 1 a� sP Including I'+5 centerline LF at S 153 per LF of (type)streets,7,2"Feet asphalt roadway. D. STORM SEXEBS: Together with a total of manholes at S 3,Sm , eachpr a total of_9 catch basins at$ 950 each, LF of biof3ltradon swale or drainage ditch with a total cost of$ Llik—CF of detention pond storage with a total cost of$ 4M2 ,and/or any other appurtenances thereto. ON FRO1V1� TQ (street,esmt,etc) Including _linear feet at S r S per LF of 17. G NI P (size&type) sewer line. To have and to hold the same to the said Grantee,Its successors and assigns forever. The undersigned hereby covenants that it is the lawful owner of said property;and that the same is free from all encumbrances;that all bills for labor and material have been paid; that it has the right to sell the same aforesaid;that it will warrant and defend the same against the lawful claims and demand of all person. The Bill of Sale is given on consideration of the agreement of the Grantee for itself,its successors and assigns to incorporate said utilities in its utility system and to maintain them as provided in the applicable City Ordinances. IN WITNESS W13EREON,tie undersigned has caused this instrument to be executed on this day of I 20_Q&_ _. lu 2 of 4 Bill of Sale STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )SS COUNTY OF KINrr G ) On this l* day of .2008 before me,the undersigned A Notary Public in an oj�the to f Washington,duly commissioned and sworn,Personally appeared "" �SLCrI ��"�' to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument,and acknowledged to me that he/she signed and sealed this instrument as his/her free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN under my hand and official seal this_ day of Aih 20-�. 0-"�11� Notary Public in snA for the ••r•,...w.•••••Q State of' ngton-residing at • l�u AN) t ` My Commission Expires: Npj�p 11 The Bill of Sale is given and accepted pursuant to a motion duly made,seconded,and passed by the City Council of the City of Kent,King County,Washington,on the day of .20 3 of 4 Bill of Sale f ADDENDUM TO BILL OF SALE CITY OF KENT The flgures used on the Bill of Sale for 9 D V,, II or A S)wr+ PA Q project dated O C'f'oln r Z �N�,were based on the"As-Built"Engineering Plans dated J U N!? JL6 . 2e08 ,for the same said �0�(-tber4 S6rt Pia project. Th.l� S Wtl ,Q yl u h i� P the undersigned P.E.or land surveyor is the person responsible for the preparation of the Bill of Sale and is an employee of c et>It V m , h n.L ,the firm responsible for the preparation of the"As-Bult"Engineering Drawings. ,LK Signature 1 j 1 4 of Bill of Sale Kent City Council Meeting Date October 21, 2008 Category Consent Calendar - 6I 1. SUB]ECT: BILL OF SALE, KENT/DES MOINES PARK & RIDE EXPANSION - ACCEPT 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Accept the Bill of Sale for the Kent/Des Moines Park & Ride Expansion for 1067 linear feet of storm sewer, 1 manhole, and 9 catch basins. The project is located at Military Road & Kent/Des Moines Road. 3 EXHIBITS: Bill of Sale 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Director (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? N/A Revenue? N/A Currently in the Budget? Yes No 6. CITY COUNCIEL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: MAIL TO: ENGINEERNG DEPARTMENT PROJECT ENGINEER ATrN: Joe Fielding 220 4TH AVENUE SOUTH KENT. WA;jgW7$1s,�S,12js Park & PROJECT:Ride,Expansion LOCATION: Military Rd & Rent/ TAX ACCf NO: DesMoines R. BILL OF SALE CITY OF KENT KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON THIS INSTRUMENT made this AtO day of December , 19 95 , by and between Kincr county , herei na fter ca I I ed "Grantors", and CITY OF KENT, a municipal corporation of King County. State of Washington, hereinafter called "Grantee": WITNESSETH: That said Grantors for a valuable consideration, does hereby grant. bargain, and sell to the Grantee, the following described improvements: A. WATE®MAINS together with a . total of gate valves at None S each, hydrants at $ each and/or any other appurtenances thereto. QN Do IQ (street, esmt, etc.) None Including linear feet at $ per LF of (size) (type) waterline. None B. SANM116BYRY EWERS together with a total of manholes at None $ each and/or any other appurtenances thereto. BILL OF SALE PAGE 1 OF 4 My Commission Expires: 5--/O r 99 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )SS COUNTY OF KING ) On this day of . 19 , before me, the undersigned. a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn. personally appeared and to me known to be the and respectively of the l that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. and on oath stated that they are authorized to execute the said instrument. Witness my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written. Notary Public in and for the State of , Washington, residing at My Commission Expires: This Bill of Sale is given and accepted pursuant to a motion duly made, seconded, and passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, King County, Washington, on the day of 19 BILL OF SALE PAGE 4 OF 4 CITY OF NEXT ADDENDUM TO BILL OF SALE 5CT CITY OF KENT KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON 1 The figures used on the Bill of Sale for Kent/DesMoines Park & Ride Expansion project dated January, 1994 , were based on the "As-Built" Engineering Plans dated July, 1994 for the same said Park & Ride expansion project. Paul Encr the undersigned P.E. or land surveyor is the person responsible for the preparation of the Bill of Sale and is an employee of King County Department of Metropolitan Services the firm responsible for the preparation of the "As-Built" Engineering Drawings. Signature Date: M558 'I.In ..r •..0 en /VON r W ACMINRTf1N 00A'17.K.ptha I Tal CPM/1NC /12na1 path Bonn Kent City Council Meeting Date October 21, 2008 Category Consent Calendar - 63 1. SUBIECT: 2008 NON-REPRESENTED CLASSIFICATION AND COMPENSATION STUDY APPEALS PHASE - APPROVE 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Approve funding for the July 1, 2008, implementa-tion of the recommendations made as a result of the 2008 Non- Represented Classification and Compensation Study Appeals. The Employee Services Department has concluded the 2008 appeals process for the Non-Represented Classification and Compensation Study for the professional, technical, and administrative support positions throughout the City. The task force approved compensation increases for 16 of the 24 classifications that appealed. The appellants will receive the new salaries retroactively paid back to July 1, 2008. The cost of implementing the appeal decisions for the remaining 6 months of 2008, is $34,150.50. When the $34,150.50 is combined with the increases given on July 1, 2008, the total cost for implementation for the remainder of 2008, is $226,061. This is still considerably less than the amount budgeted in the 2008 budget. If approved, the total cost for a twelve-month period would be $452,122. This concludes all of the phases of the current non- represented compensation study. 3. EXHIBITS: Expected Study Cost Appeals calculations 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Operations Committee 10/7/08 (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? X Revenue? Currently in the Budget? Yes X No 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: 0 0 rn N •O m 10 O• tOtDkDtD OMM O tow 0000000 000000000000000000 " t N N Ln M N N N tO E N O M Ln .-1 0 00 rl M Ln M O tO tO d CL a, N [t N N It 0N 0O �' N tO It 'tt N N 't N � � It It N N N It et It It It It It It d' It 1-40rnN 0 " m N 0w -41400m1-4 0010a00 .-1 -4 -41-4000000a000 t0 M GO 00 01 Ln M O CF � v In m m O -4* ri N m 0 00 v � d• d• w w w w w w w W w w Ln0 .-1m 000 N M M W 0MMOt00M 0 0000WO W W tD 0 0 W 0 tD 0t0t0t0 N in It N Ln tD N 0 0 tD tD tO 0 tD W tO tD M M In to to tO t0 tD t0 tO W tD 10 0 t0 tO tO tD tD LO mlu a',oro pwQw Umw W wpw pwwmWpQ ww W W W W WLuwWLuwwW W WwW �•-� M M OO N t0 t0 -4 M Ln Ln ry N N Ln N Ln N M M M M Ln Ln In Ln t v d• d• t d' T d• t t '�' �,, N N N M N M M M d• M M M M M M M M M N N N N M M M M M M M M M M M M M M a'u ul Q u � c 0) %0 00 tO tO w w 't t0 to d• It tO 14 It N N d N It Nr v N N N N It It v V' 'd• It It It O' M N n M N W O -4 M t0 O +-i W t0 M ri O 0 0 0 O O -1 .-1 .1 rl O O O O O O O O O O O O N r�% O n Ln w Ln Ln Ln w Ln Ln Ln O d• .-t N ON M 0 M It d• '• It 00 OD OD 00 00 00 00 M 00 00 NO10N a% NZo O L, M0 OmMOt00Lnt0 0 0 0 0 M W 00 00 SD %D %D tD kD %0ID %DkD %D N n It d• N q, Ln to tO N tO w tO to tO Ln tD to Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln to to tD tp tD tD tD to tO to to to to to y. LO 3 � p w a w U m w w w p w p w w m w p Q w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w m ONNNN %O 't OO NNNLf1MMM mmmmmLnLnmV gr "tvv '• � crI- 'T M N N M O ++ rl, d C %00DkDt0 00wv 00It %DIt ' OOd d � aoo000ao � d � d etd ct �td d d d d d M N N LY1 tD W 0 .-I M tD 0 .-1 W tD W 0 t0 N N N N N O O Cl O O O O O O O O O O O 10 0NN0 CtLnw Ln Lnmm W m m M M M M NNNNM000000wwwwww W m C - - N 0 0 " wN %D O N m W ommNtDM '-t M Ol M M kO tD %0 %0 0 0 4D 0 0 0 0 %0t %D rmm Nd• d• N tmtO t0 Nwt0 tDwtDMtOt0M d t V t0tOWtOtOtOtD0wtDtDtotDtD �E ;o U) Q p w Q w U m w w w p w p w w m w p Q w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w M N N N MIt 'tT OOd v N N N V V It NNNNd' 'It 'It It itd VT d V V V V M M N N M N M M M d M M M M M f n M M rn N N N N f n en M M M M M M M m M M M M 10 N E ach h IM .r 'O 'O 'O 'O 'O .0 W 'O •O 'O *+ > > > > > > M > > > > 'O 'O 'O -0 'O 'O C 'O "O -0 -0 'O -0 L 'O -0 'O "O "a 'O 'D 'O -0 'O O O O O O O O C O O O O 01 N OJ O) O) 0) 0J 0) OJ _y 0) 0J _y 0) O) W 0) O) O) N O! 0) 0J 0J 0) Z L L L L L L +- L L L L LA N C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C oG Q a a a a a S a 1 a <1<A p p p p p p p p a p p p p a 0 p in,p p a p p p p in c d E C C 0 N C u C L L L Y W W W ` ? W ` W JQ O 10 10 m f6 O 10 IC GUa a n. a aaa U a a a a d y C p• O C U N >_ n „, 000000000000000daoM000ao , MN n Ln In ! LA �0 O N CL E o In QM d to er O d' d' N N N N w W W W W W W N O 'T O N N 00 „ riN OoN o*, m NNNNNNNd- Oo COLnN O V LnCn CON NN CNNNNNNN0N q, riLn00CD l0 = Ov t.00l000 o� 01mofm0101Nl0M 00NMM Ln � rn V 0in to Ln Ln Ln � vv, v* tv* tZtvLnm MI� NN m Q .I z -I lQ� a,�n )0 N z F o v_ _ 1 c o. L. z G o W W W W W W W W W W m W W W W Q Q W N NN NNNNNNNfV N N M MOOO 'It H yMM MN NN NNNNNNNNNN 't N qr %t a C.'C, Quad ii a'eG ” 0 d' 'It N N N N 00 CO CO O O 00 00 m CO N 0 N N O C' riN 0M MM ^ NNNNNNN V O -4 ri M -1 " V M M M N N N I� N N N N N N 01 M 0 N O S V It p 0 %T Mt0 1.00 � 0101o� O� o� 01o1NMLn N N W W M N 0Ln 0Ln Ln Ln 0veh d' d d' d d' ChInN mNtOt0 r� (J Q W W W W W W W W W W W W m W W W W Q Q W O c L Nn NN NNNNNNNNNmm 0 N N •a O CMM MN NN NNNNNNNNNNM +-iM (n d N y ri C O w �F+ O i m 0Ih It OD NN N000D0000CO0000000Ol0 0 N N 0 fA m 1-4N 10O oio% � NNNNNNNV OM •-im -4 .1 Ln !0, in o1 Ln Ln N N N N N N N N N 01 Ln O N O , d' Ln a 11rL0 � MM 0 0 O► O► at M M 0101 N rn N NN0000 N � �� 0Ln 0Ln Ln Ln N t d q I- tV- tLnP% Mr�, 0o N a s N Qa o v� a V Q W W W W W W W W W W W W m W W W W Q W 'cp 'Cf NLn NN NNNNNNNNNMN On ^ ^ o i V ...CLMM MN NN N N N N N N N N N N M M M M at O O R, C O ar m N E -c u► ca a .' u► a�i v N N v N N N a > v vv o ov o 0 0 0 0 0 > > > > > > > > 3 C) C) O C) 0) C) Q) C) (V (D C) 0) C) C) y O O O O O O O WC C L C C C C C C C C C E ._ C L L L L L L L M C) N a (1) N 0) C) C) N (L) C) 0) O) w N ceooa000000000000aaQa < aa c IV )0 co a `� m G L YL > YL WC YtA Wc Wc W Yaa aa> L saaac L N 0 maL�i CL Kent City Council Meeting Date October 21, 2008 Category_Consent Calendar - 6K 1. SUBJECT: POLICE DEPARTMENT FIRING RANGE TARGETING SYSTEM AGREEMENT - AUTHORIZE 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Authorize the Mayor to sign an agreement with Canadian company Mancom, Inc., in the amount of $93,846, plus Washington State Sales Tax, for the purchase and installation of a new police firing range target system, subject to final agreement of terms and conditions acceptable to the City Attorney. Police and Parks Facility staff reviewed two proposals received through a Request for Proposals (RFP) process. Mancom, Inc. was chosen because it can provide a state-of-the-art system with current, applicable technology using Windows XP and touch screens. 3. EXHIBITS: Draft contract, RFP cover sheet, and Summary of proposals 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Operations Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? X Revenue? Currently in the Budget? Yes X No 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS Firing Range Target, Communication, and Control System PROJECT TITLE: Firing Range a Target, Communication, . and Control System PROPOSAL DUE DATE: September 15 2008 at 4:00 p p.m., Pacific Time EXPECTED TIME PERIOD November 24, 2008 through January 24, 2009 for FOR CONTRACT: performance and the ability to maintain installed system through December 31, 2019. PROPOSER ELIGIBILITY: This process is open to those Proposers registered to do business in Washington State that exhibit financial stability, experience, resources and skill to accomplish the project herein described. CONTENTS OF THE REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS: 1. Introduction 2. General Information for Proposers 3. Proposal Contents 4. Evaluation and Contract Award 5. Exhibits: Exhibit A. Certifications and Assurances Exhibit B. Draft Contract Exhibit C. Insurance Requirements 6. Attachments Mancom Systems Base Bid $65,670.00 Solid Ballistic Shooting Booth $18,767.00 Touch plus Local Control Screens $6,489.00 Integrated two way Paging/Intercom $2,920.00 Total '•$93,846.00 2 site visits per year for 3 year maintenance plan $28,200.00 Grand Total not Including Tax $122,046.00 Meggitt Training Systems Inc. Firing line divlder/intercom/wireless remote/local Intercom station/local control Included Base Bid /Total $91,868.00 2 site visits per year for 3 year maintenance plan 11 00.00 Grand Total not including Tax $112,868.00 I . I • KENT W A S H I N O T O N PUBLIC WORKS AGREEMENT between City of Kent and Mancom, Inc. THIS AGREEMENT is made by and between the City of Kent, a Washington municipal corporation (hereinafter the "City"), and Mancom, Inc. organized under the laws of the State of Washington, located and doing business at (hereinafter the "Contractor"). AGREEMENT The parties agree as follows: I. DESCRIPTION OF WORK. Contractor shall perform the following services for the City in accordance with the following described plans and/or specifications: Design, install, and provide for the maintenance of a firing range target, communication and control system with a ten year warranty as further described in the City's Request for Proposals and the Contractor's proposal, attached and incorporated as Exhibit A. Contractor further represents that the services furnished under this Agreement will be performed in ac ,ordance with generally accepted professional practices within the Puget Sound region in eff � ;,, a such services are performed. '"" << ;, 1� TIME OF ' : ' PLETION. The parties agree that work will begin on the tasks des lb#L PS91,114igreement, Section I abo mediately upon execution of this Agreement. Upon the effective date of tl�t Co ' for shall complete the work described in Section I . III. ENSATIO The City shall pay the Contractor a total amount not to exceed plus any applica ashing State Sales Tax, for the work and services contemplated in this Agreement. The ,3 ct hall invoice the City monthly. The City will pay for the portion of the work described I nvoice that has been completed by the Contractor and approved by the City. The City's p ,,, ent shall not constitute a waiver of the City's right to final inspection and acceptance of the' project. A. Performance Bond. Pursuant to Chapter 39.08 RCW, the Contractor, shall provide the City a payment and performance bond for the full contract amount to be in effect until sixty (60) days after the date of final acceptance, or until receipt of all necessary releases from the State Department of PUBLIC WORKS AGREEMENT - I Revenue and the State Department of Labor and Industries and until settlement of any liens filed under Chapter 60.28 RCW, whichever is later. B. Retainaae. The City shall hold back a retainage in the amount of five percent (5%) of any and all payments made to contractor for a period of sixty (60) days after the date of final acceptance, or until receipt of all necessary releases from the State Department of Revenue and the State Department of Labor & Industries and until settlement of any liens filed under Chapter 60.28 RCW, whichever is later. The amount retained shall be placed in a fund by the City pursuant to RCW 60.28.011(4)(a), unless otherwise instructed by the Contractor within fourteen (14) calendar days of Contractor's signature on the Agreement. C. Defective or Unauthorized Work. The City reserves its right to withhold payment from Contractor for any defective or unauthorized work. Defective or unauthorized work includes, without limitation: work and materials that do not conform to the requirements of this Agreement; and extra work and materials furnished without the City's written approval. If Contractor is unable, for any reason, to satisfactorily complete any portion of the work, the City may complete the work by contract or otherwise, and Contractor shall be liable to the City for any additional costs incurred by the City. "Additional costs" shall mean all reasonable costs, including legal costs and attorney fees, incurred by the City beyond the maximum Contract price specified above. The City further reserves its right to deduct the cost to complete the Contract work, including any Additional Costs, from any and all amounts due or to become due the Contractor. D. Final Payment: Waiver of Claims. THE CONTRACTOR'S ACCEPTANCE OF FINAL PAYMENT (EXCLUDING WITHHELD RETAINAGE) SHALL CONSTITUTE A WAIVER OF CONTRACTOR'S CLAIMS, EXCEPT THOSE PREVIOUSLY AND PROPERLY MADE AND IDENTIFIED BY CONTRACTOR AS UNSETTLED AT THE TIME FINAL PAYMENT IS MADE AND ACCEPTED. IV. NT CONTRACTOR. The parties intend that an Independent Coni ''employer nship will be created by this Agreement and that the Contractor has the a to control an t the performance and details of its work, the City being interested only � ° esults obtainer' er this Agreement. V. 1 �,MINATION he City may terminate this Agreement for good cause. "Good cause" shall in l without itation, any one or more of the following events: A. actor's refusal or failure to supply a sufficient number of properly sk orkers or proper materials for completion of the Contract work. B. The Contractor's failure to complete the work within the time specified in this Agreement. C. The Contractor's failure to make full and prompt payment to subcontractors or for material or labor. D. The Contractor's persistent disregard of federal, state or local laws, rules or regulations. PUBLIC WORKS AGREEMENT - 2 E. The Contractor's filingfor bankruptcy or becoming adjudged bankrupt. p Y 9 J 9 upt F. The Contractor's breach of any portion of this Agreement. If the City terminates this Agreement for good cause, the Contractor shall not receive any further money due under this Agreement until the Contract work is completed. After termination, the City may take possession of all records and data within the Contractor's possession pertaining to this project which may be used by the City without restriction. VI. PREVAILING WAGES. Contractor shall file a "S I t of Intent to Pay Prevailing Wages," with the State of Washington Department abor & Industries prior to commencing the Contract work. Contractor shall pay prevailin , in effect on the date the bid is accepted or executed by Contractor, and comply with pte 12 of the Revised Code of Washington, as well as any other applicable prevaili g age ra ovisions. The latest prevailing wage rate revision issued by the Department �o sand Ind s is attached. VII. CHANGES. The City may issue a en change order for 'y char3ge in the Contract work during the performance of this Ag , t. If t' Contractor de � 3 'es, for any reason, that a change order is necessary, Contra" , mus ; mit a written '` hange order request to the person listed in the notice provision s thi Agreement section XV(D), within fourteen (14) calendar days of the date Contract ew or should have known of the facts and events giving rise to the reqi`` ted change. If f sty determines that the change increases or decreases the Contractor's or time for pe , ance, the City will make an equitable adjustment. The City will at ood faith, ch agreement with the Contractor on all equitable adjustments. we a parties unable to agree, the City will determine the equitable adjustment as deem at The Contractor shall proceed with the change order work n receiving it `,r ritter►° 10 a order from the City or an oral order from the City befor "ay, receiving t ritten ch ji a order. If the Contractor fails to require a change ord '" ithin" ;' ime specifi in this paragraph, the Contractor waives its right to make any , ' �,,or sub '� ''°�subsequent range order requests for that portion of the contract work. If the ctor agrees with the quitable adjustment, the Contractor must complete the change ord ' ` Tk .�r,. ' the C ractor may elect to protest the adjustment as provided in subsections A wugh ' III, Claims, below. 3 The Contractor accepts a uirements of a change order by: (1) endorsing it, (2) writing a separate acceptance, or rotesting in the way this section provides. A change order that is accepted by Contractors rovided in this section shall constitute full payment and final settlement of all claims for cons''act time and for direct, indirect and consequential costs, including costs of delays related to any work, either covered or affected by the change. VIII. CLAIMS. If the Contractor disagrees with anything required by a change order, another written order, or an oral order from the City, including any direction, instruction, interpretation, or determination by the City, the Contractor may file a claim as provided in this section. The Contractor shall give written notice to the City of all claims within fourteen (14) calendar days of the occurrence of the events giving rise to the claims, or within fourteen (14) calendar days of the date the Contractor knew or should have known of the facts or events giving rise to the claim, whichever occurs first . Any claim for damages, additional payment for any reason, or extension of time, whether under this Agreement or otherwise, shall be conclusively deemed to have been waived by the Contractor unless a timely written claim is made in strict accordance with the applicable provisions of this Agreement. At a minimum, a Contractor's written claim shall include the information set forth in subsections A, items 1 through 5 below. PUBLIC WORKS AGREEMENT - 3 FAILURE TO PROVIDE A COMPLETE, WRITTEN NOTIFICATION OF CLAIM WITHIN THE TIME ALLOWED SHALL BE AN ABSOLUTE WAIVER OF ANY CLAIMS ARISING IN ANY WAY FROM THE FACTS OR EVENTS SURROUNDING THAT CLAIM OR CAUSED BY THAT DELAY. A. Notice of Claim. Provide a signed written notice of claim that provides the following information: 1. The date of the Contractor's claim; 2. The nature and circumstances that caused the claim; 3. The provisions in this Agreement that support the claim; 4. The estimated dollar cost, if any, of the claimed work and how that estimate was determined; and 5. An analysis of the progress schedule showing the schedule change or disruption if the Contractor is asserting a schedule change or disruption. B. Records. The Contractor shall keep complete records of extra costs and time incurred as a result of the asserted events giving rise to the claim. The City shall have access to any of the Contractor's records needed for evaluating the protest. The City will evaluate all claims, provided the procedures in this section are followed. If the City determines that a claim is valid, the City will adjust payment for work or time by an equitable adjustment. No adjustment will be made for an invalid protest. C. Contractor's Duty to Complete Protested Work. In spite of any claim, the Contractor shall proceed promptly to provide the goods, materials and services required by the City under this Agreement. D. Failure to Protest Constitutes Waiver. By not protesting as this section provides, t ractor also waives any additional entitlement and accepts from the City any oral order (including directions, instructions, interpretations, and determi Failure to Fol ro edures Constitutes Waiver. By failing to follow the procedures this section, Contractor completely waives any claims for protested work and is from th ity any written or oral order (including directions, instructions, i tations, d determination). IX. LIMI `" F ACTIONS. CONTRACTOR MUST, IN ANY EVENT, FILE ANY LAWSUIT ARISING OR CONNECTED WITH THIS AGREEMENT WITHIN 120 CALENDAR DAYS FROM THE DA THE CONTRACT WORK IS COMPLETE OR CONTRACTOR'S ABILITY TO FILE THAT CLAIM OR SUIT SHALL BE FOREVER BARRED. THIS SECTION FURTHER LIMITS ANY APPLICABLE STATUTORY LIMITATIONS PERIOD. X. WARRANTY. Upon acceptance of the contract work, Contractor must provide the City a one-year warranty bond in a form and amount acceptable to the City. The Contractor shall correct all defects in workmanship and materials within one (1) year from the date of the City's acceptance of the Contract work. In the event any parts are repaired or replaced, only original replacement parts shall be used—rebuilt or used parts will not be acceptable. When defects are corrected, the warranty for that portion of the work shall extend for one (1) year PUBLIC WORKS AGREEMENT - 4 from the date such correction is completed and accepted b the City. The Contractor shall begin P P Y Y 9 to correct any defects within seven (7) calendar days of its receipt of notice from the City of the defect. If the Contractor does not accomplish the corrections within a reasonable time as determined by the City, the City may complete the corrections and the Contractor shall pay all costs incurred by the City in order to accomplish the correction. IX. WARRANTY. This Agreement is subject to all warranty provisions established under the Uniform Commercial Code, Title 62A, Revised Code of Washington. Contractor warrants goods are merchantable, are fit for particular purpose for which they were obtained, and will perform in accord . h their specifications and Contractor's representations to City. The Contr; r shall correct all defects in workmanship and materials within one (1) ye the date of the City's acceptance of the Contract work. In the event, pa the goods are repaired, only original replacement parts shall be us d ebuilt ed parts will not be acceptable. When defects are corrected, t r my for ortion of the work shall extend for one (1) year from th �` ate uch correcti completed and accepted by the City. The Contract ' shall begin to correct efects within seven (7) calendar days of its rece' ' otice f the City of tfi f*ct. If the Contractor does not accomplish he V ctio ithin a reaso ' le time as determined by the City, the City may co e co rections and, the Contractor shall pay all costs incurred by the City in ord ccomplish the correction. X. MAINTENANCE WARRAN ntractor warr" !I at the Contract Work will be subject to repairs and maint '' assure a us for a period of not less than ten (10) years under the ms ddenda h to attached. 5 XI. DISCRIMI1�� � In the hiring f'employee or the performance of work under this Agreement or any -cone' the Contra r, its sub-contractors, or any person acting on behalf of the Contra `' `�pr sub-c ' ;actor shall n by reason of race, religion, color, sex, age, sexual orientation, Kati rig in,a r the presence,3 ny sensory, mental, or physical disability, discriminate against any "� n ,alified a .��i �available to perform the work to which the employment relates. Contractor shall execute t tached City of Kent Equal Employment Opportunity Policy Declaration, Comply with City Ad five Policy 1.2, and upon completion of the contract work, file the attached Compliance St ° ent. XII. INDEMNIFICATION. Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, injuries, damages, losses or suits, including all legal costs and attorney fees, arising out of or in connection with the Contractor's performance of this Agreement, except for that portion of the injuries and damages caused by the City's negligence. The City's inspection or acceptance of any of Contractor's work when completed shall not be grounds to avoid any of these covenants of indemnification. Should a court of competent jurisdiction determine that this Agreement is subject to RCW 4.24.115, then, in the event of liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons or damages to property caused by or resulting from the concurrent negligence of the Contractor and the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers, the Contractor's liability hereunder shall be only to the extent of the Contractor's negligence. PUBLIC WORKS AGREEMENT - 5 IT IS FURTHER SPECIFICALLY AND EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD THAT THE INDEMNIFICATION PROVIDED HEREIN CONSTITUTES THE CONTRACTOR'S WAIVER OF IMMUNITY UNDER INDUSTRIAL INSURANCE, TITLE 51 RCW, SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS INDEMNIFICATION. THE PARTIES FURTHER ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THEY HAVE MUTUALLY NEGOTIATED THIS WAIVER. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. XIII. INSURANCE. The Contractor shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement, insurance of the types and in the amounts described in Exhibit [Insert Exhibit #] attached and incorporated by this reference. XIV. WORK PERFORMED AT CONTRACTOR'S RISK. Contractor shall take all necessary precautions and shall be responsible for the safety of its employees, agents, and subcontractors in the performance of the contract work and shall utilize all protection necessary for that purpose. All work shall be done at Contractor's own risk, and Contractor shall be responsible for any loss of or damage to materials, tools, or other articles used or held for use in connection with the work. XV. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS. A. Recyclable Materials. Pursuant to Chapter 3.80 of the Kent City Code, the City requires its contractors and consultants to use recycled and recyclable products whenever practicable. A price preference may be available for any designated recycled product. B. Non-Waiver of Breach. The failure of the City to insist upon strict performance of any of the covenants and agreements contained in this Agreement, or to exercise any option conferred by this Agreement in one or more instances shall not be construed to be a waiver or relinquishment of those covenants, agreements or options, and the same shall be and remain in full force and effect. C. Resotution of Dis utes and Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and constr,, ' 3 nce with the laws of the State of Washington. If the parties are unable to settl ny dispu ference or claim arising from the parties' performance of this Agree t, the exclusi ans of resolving that dispute, difference or claim, shall only be by filin s ;,za, clusively unde venue, rules and jurisdiction of the King County Superior Court, King Court, „3, ashington, u s the parties agree in writing to an alternative dispute resolution process. I t claim or I uit for damages arising from the parties' performance of this Agreement, ea rty shall y all its legal costs and attorney's fees incurred in defending or bringing such cla laws , including all appeals, in addition to any other recovery or award provided by law; owever, nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to limit the City's right to indemn ' EE on under Section XII of this Agreement. D. Written Notice. All communications regarding this Agreement shall be sent to the parties at the addresses listed on the signature page of the Agreement, unless notified to the contrary. Any written notice hereunder shall become effective three (3) business days after the date of mailing by registered or certified mail, and shall be deemed sufficiently given if sent to the addressee at the address stated in this Agreement or such other address as may be hereafter specified in writing. E. Assignment. Any assignment of this Agreement by either party without the written consent of the non-assigning party shall be void. If the non-assigning party gives its consent to PUBLIC WORKS AGREEMENT - 6 any assignment, the terms of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect and no further assignment shall be made without additional written consent. F. Modification. No waiver, alteration or modification of any of the provisions of this Agreement shall be binding unless in writing and signed by a duly authorized representative of the City and Contractor. G. Entire Agreement. The written provisions and terms of this Agreement, together with any Exhibits attached hereto, shall supersede all prior verbal st ments of any officer or other representative of the City, and such statements shall not be e or be construed as entering into or forming a part of or altering in any manner thi reement. All of the above documents are hereby made a part of this Agreement. In the ,, f an inconsistency in this Agreement, the inconsistency shall be resolved by giving pre enc a following order: 1. Applicable federal and state staiS ��, and regul and City laws, ordinances, and regulations; "33' 2. Agreed amendments to this Agr ent; " 3. This Agreement, including thpofn ce re q=_' ements exhibit, 4. Contractor's Certifications and Ass es ted with its p'x posal; 5. Contractor's proposal responding to t� y's Request for Proposals; 6. The City's Request f F, Proposal docum d any addenda to the Request for Proposal; 7. Any other provision t a hment, or incorporated herein by reference or otherwise i orp H. Compliance with Laws. The Con ctgti° re mply with all federal, state, and municipal laws, rules, an _ ons that are flvv effectiv r in the future become applicable PP to Contractor's bus ine� ; equi` �'' t, and per '` nnel engaged in operations covered by this Agreement or accrui ` „'```' t of the formance of `,ose operations. I. Counterlart '., is "' ,,ent may , executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall constii" ��3 n "� II of which will together constitute this one Agreement. ��` IN WITNESS, the parties J xecute this Agreement, which shall become effective on the last date entered' , ow. CONTRACTOR: CITY OF KENT: By: By: (signature) (signature) Print Name: Print Name: Suzette Cooke Its Its Mayor (tale) DATE: DATE: NOTICES TO BE SENT TO: NOTICES TO BE SENT TO: CONTRACTOR: CITY OF KENT: PUBLIC WORKS AGREEMENT - 7 [Insert Contact Name] [Insert Name of City Rep. to Receive Notice] [Insert Company Name] City of Kent [Insert Address] 220 Fourth Avenue South [Address - Continued] Kent, WA 98032 [Insert Telephone Number] (telephone) (253) [Insert Phone Number] (telephone) [Insert Fax Number] (facsimile) (253) [Insert Fax Number] (facsimile) APPROVED AS TO FORM: Kent Law Department [In this field,you may enter the electronic fllepath where the contract has been saved] aj iM' a"& 3l Y PUBLIC WORKS AGREEMENT - 8 DECLARATION CITY OF KENT EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY POLICY The City of Kent is committed to conform to Federal and State laws regarding equal opportunity. As such all contractors, subcontractors and suppliers who perform work with relation to this Agreement shall comply with the regulations of the City's equal ployment opportunity policies. The following questions specifically identify the requirements deems necessary for any contractor, subcontractor or supplier on this specific Agre nt t ere to. An affirmative response is required on all of the following questions fort is reeme a valid and binding. If any contractor, subcontractor or supplier willfully mis e s thems with regard to the directives outlines, it will be considered a breach o ti, ontract and it will t the City's sole determination regarding suspension or termination fi- all or p t of the Agree `' t The questions are as follows: �a 1. I have read the attached City of Kent administrativ y number 1.2. 2. During the time of this Agreemen not discrimina employment on the basis of sex, race, color, national origin, ag e, resence of sory, mental or physical disability. 3. During the time of th' reement the ontra ' I provide a written statement to all new employee 3 ' ,, contractors 01 icating c mitment as an equal opportunity employer. 4. During the time Agre :` ent I, the pri ontractor, will actively consider hiring and promotion of wome 5. Before acceptance of thi Bement, a adherence statement will be signed by me, the Prime Contractor, that the a Contractor complied with the requirements as set forth above. By signing below, I agree to fulfill th ive requirements referenced above. Dated this day of , 200_. By For: Title: Date: EEO COMPLIANCE DOCUMENTS - 1 CITY OF KENT ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY NUMBER: 1.2 EFFECTIVE DATE: January 1, 1998 SUBJECT: MINORITY AND WOMEN SUPERSEDES: April 1, 1996 CONTRACTORS APPROVED BY Jim White, Mayor POLICY: Equal employment opportunity requirements for the City of Kent will conform to federal and state laws. All contractors, subcontractors, consultants and suppliers of the City must guarantee equal employment opportunity within their organization and, if holding Agreements with the City amounting to $10,000 or more within any given year, must take the following affirmative steps: 1. Provide a written statement to all new employees and subcontractors indicating commitment as an equal opportunity employer. 2. Actively consider for promotion and advancement available minorities and women. Any contractor, subcontractor, consultant or supplier who willfully disregards the City's nondiscrimination and equal opportunity requirements shall be considered in breach of contract and subject to suspension or termination for all or part of the Agreement. Contract Compliance Officers will be appointed by the Directors of Planning, Parks, and Public Works Departments to assume the following duties for their respective departments. 1. Ensuri, „ ontractors, subcontractors, consultants, and suppliers subject to these re iliar with the regulations and the City's equal employment opportunity Y• � i q 2. ring to assure erence to federal, state and local laws, policies and guidelines. EEO COMPLIANCE DOCUMENTS - 2 CITY OF KENT EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMPLIANCE STATEMENT This form shall be filled out AFTER COMPLETION of this project by the Contractor awarded the Agreement. I, the undersigned, a duly represented agent of Company, hereby acknowledge and declare that the before ntion mpany was the prime contractor for the Agreement known as ;' , t as enter o on the (date) , between t ` ;;firm I represent and ty of Kent. I declare that I complied fully with all of the requireme oblig tions as outlined in the City t, of Kent Administrative Policy 1.2 and th eclaration City o t Equal Employment Opportunity Policy that was part of the before-mentio eement. Dated this day of For: a,,.; ,� Title: Date: EEO COMPLIANCE DOCUMENTS - 3 ' Kent City Council Meeting Date October 21, 2008 Category Consent Calendar - 6L 1. SUBJECT: CELL PHONE RECYCLING PROGRAM TO BENEFIT DOMESTIC VIOLENCE VICTIMS - ESTABLISH AND AMEND BUDGET 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Establish a project account into which community donations and cell phone recycling revenue may be deposited to fund emergency assistance to domestic violence victims, amend the budget as required, authorize expenditure of these funds for emergency assistance to domestic violence victims, and ratify all acts consistent with this approval. In an effort to help protect those victims who are at the greatest risk of harm, the Law Department has established a program to provide emergency travel, shelter, and meal assistance to domestic violence victims. This program is funded not only by community donations, but also by the department's cell phone recycling program. The department's victim advocates collect donated cell phones, and in 1 exchange for the donated cell phones, Shelter Alliance remits a nominal fee to the City. In 2007, Shelter Alliance remitted $1,787 to the City for recycled cell phones. So far in 2008, the City has received an additional $138. In recognition of October being Domestic Violence Awareness Month, the Law Department requests Council approve establishment of a project account using the funds previously received and into which additional donations and cell phone recycling revenue may be deposited, and offset by any expenses previously paid. 3. EXHIBITS: Memo to Operations Committee 10/2/08 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Operations Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? X Revenue? X Currently in the Budget? Yes No 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ' ACTION: 23 LAW DEPARTMENT Tom Brubaker, City Attorney ' Phone: 253-856-5770 KENT Fax: 253-856-6770 WAS HI NGTON Address: 220 Fourth Avenue S. Kent, WA. 98032-5895 October 1, 2008 To: Operations Committee From: Tom Brubaker, City Attorney Regarding: Cell Phone Recycling Program to Benefit Domestic Violence Victims MOTION: Recommend Council establish a project account into which community donations and cell phone recycling revenue may be deposited ' to fund emergency assistance to domestic violence victims, amend the budget as required, and authorize expenditure of these funds for emergency assistance to domestic violence victims. ' SUMMARY: In 2007 the Kent Police Department responded to 6,880 domestic violence incidents. Over 1,000 of those cases involved assaults where an arrest was made. In an effort to help protect those victims that are at the greatest risk of harm, the Law Department has established a program to provide emergency travel, shelter, and meal assistance to domestic violence victims. This program is funded not only by community donations, but also by the department's cell phone recycling program. The department's victim advocates collect donated cell phone, and in exchange, Shelter Alliance remits a nominal fee to the City for each phone recycled. In 2007, Shelter Alliance remitted $1,787 to the City for recycled cell phones. So far in 2008 the City has received an additional $138. In recognition of October being Domestic Violence Awareness Month, the Law Department requests Council approve establishment of a project account into which community donations and ' cell phone recycling revenue may be deposited, amend the budget as required, and authorize the expenditure of these funds on emergency assistance to domestic violence victims. ' BUDGET IMPACT: None. ' P\Civil\Mo[ions-BlueSheets\DomeshcVolence-CeIlPhoneRecycleFrogram Goc Kent CityCouncil Meeting 9 Date October 21, 2008 Category Consent Calendar - 6M 1. SUBIECT: MODULAR SPACE CORPORATION PURCHASING AGREEMENT - AUTHORIZE 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Authorize the Mayor to sign an agreement with Modular Space Corporation for the purchase of a modular office building in an amount not to exceed $60,000, subject to final agreement terms and conditions acceptable to the City Attorney. The Fire Department requested and received from the Mayor a waiver of the bidding requirements pursuant to KCC 3.70.080 for the purchase of a 24' x 44' modular office building from ModSpace of Kent, Washington. After contacting three companies who lease or sell modular office buildings, and requesting quotes from each, it was determined that the purchase of a used mobile office building from ModSpace best met the needs and expectations of the Fire Department. The City Attorney's Ofl•Ice has reviewed this Agreement. 3. EXHIBITS: Sole Source Authorization and Public Works Agreement 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Safety Committee 10/14/08 (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? X Revenue? Currently in the Budget? Yes X No 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: 1 FIRE DEPARTMENT Jim Schneider, Fire Chief Phone: 253-856-4300 KEN T Fax: 253-856-6300 WAHHINOTON Address: 24611 11611 Ave. SE Kent, WA. 98030-4939 September 30, 2008 To: Mayor Suzette Cooke Through: John Hodgson, Chief Administrative Officer From: Jim Schneider, Fire Chief Regarding: Single Source Procurement - ModSpace The Kent Fire Department is requesting a waiver, pursuant to KCC P q 9 3.70.080, of the City's procurement ordinance as negotiation with a particular supplier is appropriate due to the specialized needs of the Fire Department. The Kent Fire Department has been extremely diligent In researching the purchase of a modular office building, in a timely manner, at the lowest ' possible price. The fire department's interest is in acquiring a modular office building that Is functional and provides us the additional space we need for staff. With that goal In mind, the fire department sought information from as many sources as possible, including local businesses, the Kent School District, and the Internet. We then visited a local business that leases and sells modular office buildings to evaluate the quality and functionality of this type of building to determine If it would meet our needs. We have outgrown the available office space at Fire Headquarters. In an effort to create a workplace environment that provides Increased functionality and privacy for staff, additional office space is needed. Purchasing a modular office building provides us the space we need at a cost significantly less than new construction. After considering all the Information available, including: The number of staff members who will be assigned to work in the modular office building, ' • Alternate uses of the modular office building during a large-scale disaster, The appropriate size of a modular office building for the size available, • Alternate uses of the modular office building in the future, • And is similar in appearance to the existing building, 1 I am requesting authorization to-purchase a modular office building. ECEIREN Memorandum: Mayor Suzette Cooke September 30, 2008 Page: 2 c modular building would come from Funding for the purchase of a m a office ding ou om funds identified in the Capital Facilities budget for the Washington Avenue fire station. The fire department would like to contract with ModSpace to purchase a 24' x 44' modular office building. By this memo, the Fire Department requests that you determine the bidding process usually required by KCC 3.70.030 and .040 is not in the best interests of the City and that you authorize the Fire Department to enter into direct negotiations with ModSpace for the purchase of a 24' x 44' modular office building. The contract will be brought before the Public Safety Committee and the City Council for approval. If you approve of the Fire Departments request for a waiver of the City's procurement policies, please note your approval by signing below. ' Thank you. Procurement waiver approved: �✓j�n �OMc.r ,,ice� Jim Schneidero Fire Chief FSVe Cooke, Mayor Q 6t-e ' 1 • KENT W A 5 H I N G T O N PUBLIC WORKS AGREEMENT between City of Kent and Modular Space Corporation (d/b/a ModSpace) THIS AGREEMENT is made by and between the City of Kent, a Washington municipal corporation (hereinafter the "City"), and Modular Space Corporation organized under the laws of the State of Pennsylvania, located and doing business at 19432 - 841h Avenue South, Kent, WA 98032-1240 (hereinafter the "Contractor"). AGREEMENT The parties agree as follows: I. DESCRIPTION OF WORK. Contractor shall perform the following services for the City in accordance with the following described plans and/or specifications: Deliver, set-up, anchor/tie down, one 24' x 44' modular office building (complex #076615 and 076616) in accordance with Contractor's September 29, 2008, quote attached and incorporated as Exhibit A. Contractor further represents that the services furnished under this Agreement will be performed in accordance with generally accepted professional practices within the Puget Sound region in effect at the time such services are performed. II. TIME OF COMPLETION. The parties agree that work will begin on the tasks described in Section I above immediately upon execution of this Agreement. Upon the effective date of this Agreement, Contractor shall complete the work described in Section I by December ' 31, 2008. III. COMPENSATION. The City shall pay the Contractor a total amount not to exceed Sixty Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($60,000), including applicable Washington State Sales Tax, for the work and services contemplated in this Agreement. The Contractor shall invoice the City monthly. The City will pay for the portion of the work described in the invoice that has been completed by the Contractor and approved by the City. The City's payment shall not constitute a waiver of the City's right to final inspection and acceptance of the project. A. Performance Bond. Pursuant to Chapter 39.08 RCW, the Contractor, shall provide the City a performance bond for the full contract amount to be in effect until sixty (60) days after the date of final acceptance, or until receipt of all necessary releases from the State Department of Revenue and the ' PUBLIC WORKS AGREEMENT - 1 (Over$10,000 w/Performance Bond) State Department of Labor and Industries and until settlement of any liens filed under Chapter 60.28 RCW, whichever is later. B. Retainaae. The City shall hold back a retainage in the amount of five percent (5%) of any and all payments made to contractor for a period of sixty (60) days after the date of final acceptance, or until receipt of all necessary releases from the State Department of Revenue and the State Department of Labor & Industries and until settlement of any liens filed under Chapter 60.28 RCW, whichever is later. The amount retained shall be placed in a fund by the City pursuant to RCW 60.28.011(4)(a), unless otherwise instructed by the Contractor within fourteen (14) calendar days of Contractor's signature on the Agreement. , C. Defective or Unauthorized Work. The City reserves its right to withhold payment from Contractor for any defective or unauthorized work. Defective or unauthorized work includes, without limitation: work and materials that do not conform to the requirements of this Agreement; and extra work and materials furnished without the City's written approval. If Contractor is unable, for any reason, to satisfactorily complete any portion of the work, the City may complete the work by contract or otherwise, and Contractor shall be liable to the City for any additional costs incurred by the City. "Additional costs" shall mean all reasonable costs, including legal costs and attorney fees, incurred by the City beyond the maximum Contract price specified above. The City further reserves its right to deduct the cost to complete the Contract work, including any Additional Costs, from any and all amounts due or to become due the Contractor. D. Final Payment: Waiver of Claims. THE CONTRACTOR'S ACCEPTANCE OF , FINAL PAYMENT (EXCLUDING WITHHELD RETAINAGE) SHALL CONSTITUTE A WAIVER OF CONTRACTOR'S CLAIMS, EXCEPT THOSE PREVIOUSLY AND PROPERLY MADE AND IDENTIFIED BY CONTRACTOR AS UNSETTLED AT THE TIME FINAL PAYMENT IS MADE AND ACCEPTED. IV. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. The parties intend that an Independent , Contractor-Employer Relationship will be created by this Agreement and that the Contractor has the ability to control and direct the performance and details of its work, the City being interested , only in the results obtained under this Agreement. V. TERMINATION. The City may terminate this Agreement for good cause. "Good cause" shall include, without limitation, any one or more of the following events: A. The Contractor's refusal or failure to supply a sufficient number of properly , skilled workers or proper materials for completion of the Contract work. B. The Contractor's failure to complete the work within the time specified in this , Agreement. C. The Contractor's failure to make full and prompt payment to subcontractors or for material or labor. D. The Contractor's persistent disregard of federal, state or local laws, rules or regulations. PUBLIC WORKS AGREEMENT - 2 , (Over$10,000 w/Performance Bond) E. The Contractor's filing for bankruptcy or becoming adjudged bankrupt. F. The Contractor's breach of any portion of this Agreement. 1 If the City terminates this Agreement for good cause, the Contractor shall not receive any further money due under this Agreement until the Contract work is completed. After termination, the City may take possession of all records and data within the Contractor's possession pertaining to this project which may be used by the City without restriction. VI. PREVAILING WAGES. Contractor shall file a "Statement of Intent to Pay Prevailing Wages," with the State of Washington Department of Labor & Industries prior to commencing the Contract work. Contractor shall pay prevailing wages in effect on the date the bid is accepted or executed by Contractor, and comply with Chapter 39.12 of the Revised Code of Washington, as well as any other applicable prevailing wage rate provisions. The latest prevailing wage rate revision issued by the Department of Labor and Industries is attached. VII. CHANGES. The City may issue a written change order for any change in the Contract work during the performance of this Agreement. If the Contractor determines, for any reason, that a change order is necessary, Contractor must submit a written change order request to the person listed in the notice provision section of this Agreement, section XV(D), within fourteen (14) calendar days of the date Contractor knew or should have known of the facts and events giving rise to the requested change. If the City determines that the change increases or decreases the Contractor's costs or time for performance, the City will make an equitable adjustment. The City will attempt, in good faith, to reach agreement with the Contractor on all equitable adjustments. However, if the parties are unable to agree, the City will determine the equitable adjustment as it deems appropriate. The Contractor shall proceed with the change order work upon receiving either a written change order from the City or an oral order from the City before actually receiving the written change order. If the Contractor fails to require a change order within the time specified in this paragraph, the Contractor waives its right to make any claim or submit subsequent change order requests for that portion of the contract work. If the Contractor disagrees with the equitable adjustment, the Contractor must complete the change order work; however, the Contractor may elect to protest the adjustment as provided in subsections A through E of Section VIII, Claims, below. The Contractor accepts all requirements of a change order by: (1) endorsing it, (2) writing a separate acceptance, or (3) not protesting in the way this section provides. A change order that is accepted by Contractor as provided in this section shall constitute full payment and final settlement of all claims for contract time and for direct, indirect and consequential costs, including costs of delays related to any work, either covered or affected by the change. VIII. CLAIMS. If the Contractor disagrees with anything required by a change order, another written order, or an oral order from the City, including any direction, instruction, interpretation, or determination by the City, the Contractor may file a claim as provided in this section. The Contractor shall give written notice to the City of all claims within fourteen (14) calendar days of the occurrence of the events giving rise to the claims, or within fourteen (14) calendar days of the date the Contractor knew or should have known of the facts or events giving rise to the claim, whichever occurs first . Any claim for damages, additional payment for any reason, or extension of time, whether under this Agreement or otherwise, shall be conclusively deemed to have been waived by the Contractor unless a timely written claim is made in strict accordance with the applicable provisions of this Agreement. ' PUBLIC WORKS AGREEMENT - 3 (Over$10,000 w/Performance Bond) At a minimum a Contractor's written claim shall include the information set forth in subsections A, items 1 through 5 below. FAILURE TO PROVIDE A COMPLETE, WRITTEN NOTIFICATION OF CLAIM , WITHIN THE TIME ALLOWED SHALL BE AN ABSOLUTE WAIVER OF ANY CLAIMS ARISING IN ANY WAY FROM THE FACTS OR EVENTS SURROUNDING THAT CLAIM OR CAUSED BY THAT DELAY. A. Notice of Claim. Provide a signed written notice of claim that provides the following information: 1. The date of the Contractor's claim; 2. The nature and circumstances that caused the claim; 3. The provisions in this Agreement that support the claim; 4. The estimated dollar cost, if any, of the claimed work and how that estimate was determined; and 5. An analysis of the progress schedule showing the schedule change or disruption if the Contractor is asserting a schedule change or disruption. B. Records. The Contractor shall keep complete records of extra costs and time incurred as a result of the asserted events giving rise to the claim. The City shall have access to any of the Contractor's records needed for evaluating the protest. The City will evaluate all claims, provided the procedures in this section are followed. If the City determines that a claim is valid, the City will adjust payment for work or time by an equitable adjustment. No adjustment will be made for an invalid protest. C. Contractor's Duty to Complete Protested Work. In spite of any claim, the , Contractor shall proceed promptly to provide the goods, materials and services required by the City under this Agreement. D. Failure to Protest Constitutes Waiver. By not protesting as this section provides, the Contractor also waives any additional entitlement and accepts from the City any written or oral order (including directions, instructions, interpretations, and determination). E. Failure to Follow Procedures Constitutes Waiver. By failing to follow the procedures of this section, the Contractor completely waives any claims for protested work and accepts from the City any written or oral order (including directions, instructions, interpretations, and determination). , IX. LIMITATION OF ACTIONS. CONTRACTOR MUST, IN ANY EVENT, FILE ANY LAWSUIT ARISING FROM OR CONNECTED WITH THIS AGREEMENT WITHIN 120 CALENDAR , DAYS FROM THE DATE THE CONTRACT WORK IS COMPLETE OR CONTRACTOR'S ABILITY TO FILE THAT CLAIM OR SUIT SHALL BE FOREVER BARRED. THIS SECTION FURTHER LIMITS ANY APPLICABLE STATUTORY LIMITATIONS PERIOD. X. WARRANTY. Upon acceptance of the contract work, Contractor must provide the City a one-year warranty bond in a form and amount acceptable to the City. The Contractor shall correct all defects in workmanship and materials within one (1) year from the date of the PUBLIC WORKS AGREEMENT - 4 , (Over$10,000 w/Performance Bond) City's acceptance of the Contract work. In the event any parts are repaired or replaced, only original replacement parts shall be used—rebuilt or used parts will not be acceptable. When defects are corrected, the warranty for that portion of the work shall extend for one (1) year from the date such correction is completed and accepted by the City. The Contractor shall begin to correct any defects within seven (7) calendar days of its receipt of notice from the City of the defect. If the Contractor does not accomplish the corrections within a reasonable time as determined by the City, the City may complete the corrections and the Contractor shall pay all costs incurred by the City in order to accomplish the correction. XI. DISCRIMINATION. In the hiring of employees for the performance of work under this Agreement or any sub-contract, the Contractor, its sub-contractors, or any person acting on 1 behalf of the Contractor or sub-contractor shall not, by reason of race, religion, color, sex, age, sexual orientation, national origin, or the presence of any sensory, mental, or physical disability, discriminate against any person who is qualified and available to perform the work to which the employment relates. Contractor shall execute the attached City of Kent Equal Employment Opportunity Policy Declaration, Comply with City Administrative Policy 1.2, and upon completion of the contract work, file the attached Compliance Statement. XII. INDEMNIFICATION. Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, injuries, damages, losses or suits, including all legal costs and attorney fees, arising out of or in connection with the Contractor's performance of this Agreement, except for that portion of the injuries and damages caused by the City's negligence. 1 The City's inspection or acceptance of any of Contractor's work when completed shall not be grounds to avoid any of these covenants of indemnification. Should a court of competent jurisdiction determine that this Agreement is subject to RCW 4.24.115, then, in the event of liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons or damages to property caused by or resulting from the concurrent negligence of the Contractor ' and the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers, the Contractor's liability hereunder shall be only to the extent of the Contractor's negligence. IT IS FURTHER SPECIFICALLY AND EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD THAT THE INDEMNIFICATION PROVIDED HEREIN CONSTITUTES THE CONTRACTOR'S WAIVER OF IMMUNITY UNDER INDUSTRIAL INSURANCE, TITLE 51 RCW, SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS INDEMNIFICATION. THE PARTIES FURTHER ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THEY HAVE MUTUALLY NEGOTIATED THIS WAIVER. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. 1 XIII. INSURANCE. The Contractor shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement, insurance of the types and in the amounts described in Exhibit B attached and incorporated by this reference. XIV. WORK PERFORMED AT CONTRACTOR'S RISK. Contractor shall take all necessary precautions and shall be responsible for the safety of its employees, agents, and subcontractors in the performance of the contract work and shall utilize all protection necessary for that purpose. All work shall be done at Contractor's own risk, and Contractor shall be PUBLIC WORKS AGREEMENT - 5 (Over$10,000 w/Performance Bond) responsible for any loss of or damage to materials, tools, or other articles used or held for use in connection with the work. XV. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS. A. Recyclable Materials. Pursuant to Chapter 3.80 of the Kent City Code, the City requires its contractors and consultants to use recycled and recyclable products whenever practicable. A price preference may be available for any designated recycled product. B. Non-Waiver of Breach. The failure of the City to insist upon strict performance of any of the covenants and agreements contained in this Agreement, or to exercise any option conferred by this Agreement in one or more instances shall not be construed to be a waiver or relinquishment of those covenants, agreements or options, and the same shall be and remain in full force and effect. C. Resolution of Disputes and Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. If the parties are unable to settle any dispute, difference or claim arising from the parties' performance of this Agreement, the exclusive means of resolving that dispute, difference or claim, shall only be by filing suit exclusively under the venue, rules and jurisdiction of the King County Superior Court, King County, Washington, unless the parties agree in writing to an alternative dispute resolution process. In any claim or lawsuit for damages arising from the parties' performance of this Agreement, each party shall pay all its legal costs and attorney's fees incurred in defending or bringing such claim or lawsuit, including all appeals, in addition to any other recovery or award provided by law; provided, however, nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to limit the City's right to indemnification under Section XII of this Agreement. D. Written Notice. All communications regarding this Agreement shall be sent to the parties at the addresses listed on the signature page of the Agreement, unless notified to the contrary. Any written notice hereunder shall become effective three (3) business days after the date of mailing by registered or certified mail, and shall be deemed sufficiently given if sent to the addressee at the address stated in this Agreement or such other address as may be hereafter specified in writing. E. Assignment. Any assignment of this Agreement by either party without the written consent of the non-assigning party shall be void. If the non-assigning party gives its consent to any assignment, the terms of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect and no further assignment shall be made without additional written consent. F. Modification. No waiver, alteration, or modification of any of the provisions of this ' Agreement shall be binding unless in writing and signed by a duly authorized representative of the City and Contractor. G. Entire Ag-reement. The written provisions and terms of this Agreement, together with any Exhibits attached hereto, shall supersede all prior verbal statements of any officer or , other representative of the City, and such statements shall not be effective or be construed as entering into or forming a part of or altering in any manner this Agreement. All of the above documents are hereby made a part of this Agreement. However, should any language in any of the Exhibits to this Agreement conflict with any language contained in this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail. PUBLIC WORKS AGREEMENT - 6 (Over$10,000 w/Performance Bond) H. Compliance with Laws. The Contractor agrees to comply with all federal state and 9 P municipal laws, rules, and regulations that are now effective or in the future become applicable to Contractor's business, equipment, and personnel engaged in operations covered by this Agreement or accruing out of the performance of those operations. I. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, ■ each of which shall constitute an original, and all of which will together constitute this one Agreement. IN WITNESS, the parties below execute this Agreement, which shall become effective on the last date entered below. CONTRACTOR: CITY: MODULAR SPACE CORPORATION CITY OF KENT By: By: (signature) (signature) Print Name: Print Name: Suzette Cooke Its Its Mayor (title) DATE: DATE: NOTICES TO BE SENT TO: NOTICES TO BE SENT TO: CONTRACTOR: CITY OF KENT: Attn: Teri Davis Pat Pawlak, Division Chief Modular Space Corporation City of Kent Fire Department 19432 - 84th Avenue South 220 Fourth Avenue South Kent, WA 98032 Kent, WA 98032 (253) 395-0301 (telephone) (253) 856-4305 (telephone) (253) 395-0235 (facsimile) (253) 856-6300 (facsimile) APPROVED AS TO FORM: Kent Law Department P\Clvll\Flies\Open Files\0040-2008\Modular5paceCorp-PWAgreement doc PUBLIC WORKS AGREEMENT - 7 (Over$10,000 w/Performance Bond) DECLARATION CITY OF KENT EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY POLICY The City of Kent is committed to conform to Federal and State laws regarding equal opportunity. As such all contractors, subcontractors and suppliers who perform work with relation to this Agreement shall comply with the regulations of the City's equal employment opportunity policies. The following questions specifically identify the requirements the City deems necessary for any L contractor, subcontractor or supplier on this specific Agreement to adhere to. An affirmative response is required on all of the following questions for this Agreement to be valid and binding. If any contractor, subcontractor or supplier willfully misrepresents themselves with regard to the directives outlines, it will be considered a breach of contract and it will be at the City's sole determination regarding suspension or termination for all or part of the Agreement; The questions are as follows: 1. I have read the attached City of Kent administrative policy number 1.2. 2. During the time of this Agreement I will not discriminate in employment on the basis of sex, race, color, national origin, age, or the presence of all sensory, mental or physical disability. 3. During the time of this Agreement the prime contractor will provide a written statement to all new employees and subcontractors indicating commitment as an equal opportunity employer. 4. During the time of the Agreement I, the prime contractor, will actively consider hiring and promotion of women and minorities. 5. Before acceptance of this Agreement, an adherence statement will be signed by me, the Prime Contractor, that the Prime Contractor complied with the requirements as set forth above. By signing below, I agree to fulfill the five requirements referenced above. Dated this day of )1200 . By: For: Title: Date: EEO COMPLIANCE DOCUMENTS - 1 CITY OF KENT ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY NUMBER: 1.2 EFFECTIVE DATE: January 1, 1998 SUBJECT: MINORITY AND WOMEN SUPERSEDES: April 1, 1996 CONTRACTORS APPROVED BY Jim White, Mayor POLICY: Equal employment opportunity requirements for the City of Kent will conform to federal and state laws. All contractors, subcontractors, consultants and suppliers of the City must guarantee equal employment opportunity within their organization and, if holding Agreements with the City amounting to $10,000 or more within any given year, must take the following affirmative steps: 1. Provide a written statement to all new employees and subcontractors indicating commitment as an equal opportunity employer. 2. Actively consider for promotion and advancement available minorities and women. Any contractor, subcontractor, consultant or supplier who willfully disregards the City's nondiscrimination and equal opportunity requirements shall be considered in breach of contract and subject to suspension or termination for all or part of the Agreement. Contract Compliance Officers will be appointed by the Directors of Planning, Parks, and Public Works Departments to assume the following duties for their respective departments. 1. Ensuring that contractors, subcontractors, consultants, and suppliers subject to these regulations are familiar with the regulations and the City's equal employment opportunity policy. 2. Monitoring to assure adherence to federal, state and local laws, policies and guidelines. EEO COMPLIANCE DOCUMENTS - 2 CITY OF KENT EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMPLIANCE STATEMENT This form shall be filled out AFTER COMPLETION of this project by the Contractor awarded the Agreement. I, the undersigned, a duly represented agent of Company, hereby acknowledge and declare that the before-mentioned company was the prime contractor for the Agreement known as that was entered into on the (date) , between the firm I represent and the City of Kent. I declare that I complied fully with all of the requirements and obligations as outlined in the City of Kent Administrative Policy 1.2 and the Declaration City of Kent Equal Employment Opportunity Policy that was part of the before-mentioned Agreement. Dated this day of , 200 By: , For: Title: Date: 1 EEO COMPLIANCE DOCUMENTS - 3 ' Kent City Council Meeting Date October 21, 2008 Category Consent Calendar - 6N 1. SUBJECT: PIERCE COUNTY EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT - AUTHORIZE 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Authorize the Mayor to sign the Memorandum of Agreement with Pierce County Emergency Management for City staff to participate in the U.S. Department of Homeland Security/Federal Emergency Management Agency National Urban Search and Rescue System. The Agreement identifies Pierce County as the Sponsoring Agency and Kent as the Participating agency and identifies participation conditions to include: member requirements, sponsoring agency requirements, participating agency requirements, pay schedules, reimbursement procedures, etc. The City Attorney's Office has reviewed this Agreement. 3. EXHIBITS,: Memorandum of Agreement 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Safety Committee 10/14/08 (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? N/A Revenue? N/A Currently in the Budget? Yes No 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN Pierce County AS THE SPONSORING AGENCY OF THE WASHINGTON STATE TASK FORCE 1 OF THE NATIONAL URBAN SEARCH AND RESCUE RESPONSE SYSTEM AND City of Kent,Washington 220 4th Ave South Kent,WA 98032 AS A PARTICIPATING AGENCY OF THE TASK FORCE This"Agreement" is entered into by and between the parties designated in Section 1, below, who agree that subject to all of the provisions of this Agreement, The Pierce County Sheriff's Department will serve as a Participating Agency for the Washington State Task Force 1 of the National Urban Search and Rescue Response System. Each party further agrees that it assumes all of the duties and responsibilities assigned to that party under this Agreement and that so long as this Agreement remains in effect,the party will fully perform all of those duties and responsibilities. 1. PARTIES The parties to this Agreement are the following entities: 1.1. Sponsoring Agency: Pierce County 2501 So 35T". Street, Suite D Tacoma WA 98409 253-798-6595 1.2 Participating Agency: City of Kent,Washington 220 4th Ave South Kent,WA 98032 1 2. RECITALS Sponsoring Agency and Participating Agency have entered into this Agreement in recognition of the following Recitals: 2.1 Sponsoring Agency. Sponsoring Agency is a cooperating party under a "Memorandum of Agreement"with the Federal Emergency Management Agency ("FEMA") and the State of Washington. 2.2 National Urban Search & Rescue Response System. Pursuant to federal law, principally the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 5121 through 5206 (the "Stafford Act"), the U.S. Department of Homeland Security("DHS"), acting through FEMA, operates the National Urban Search & Rescue Response System ("System") in conjunction with State and local governments. 2.3 Task Forces. Each Sponsoring Agency is responsible for recruiting and organizing a Task Force consisting of individuals occupying certain specified positions plus additional support personnel, all of whom have been properly trained with the requisite skills and capabilities required for urban search and rescue operations and/or deployment of the Task Force. A Task Force may be deployed as a single unit or it may be reorganized into teams for purposes of modularized responses for limited or specialized Activations. Members of a Task Force may also be deployed as members of a management or other technical team. 2.4 Washington State Task Force 1. Pierce County Department of Emergency Management is the Sponsoring Agency for Washington Task Force 1 (the "Task Force") and is charged with, among other things, recruiting and organizing members for the Task Force. In the performance of its responsibilities, the Sponsoring Agency may enter into cooperative arrangements with federal, state, or local government entities, or non-profit or for-profit entities, to serve as participating Agencies in the Task Force and with individuals to serve as Affiliated Personnel of the Task Force. The Sponsoring Agency is obligated to enter into written agreements with those Participating Agencies and Affiliated Personnel setting forth the relationship between the parties. 2.5 Participating_Agency. The City of Kent, Washington desires to be a Participating Agency in the Task Force, subject to all of the provisions of this Agreement. 2.6 Applicable Provisions. With respect to National Urban Search & Rescue Response System activities, this Agreement incorporates the provisions of Interim Final Rule, "National Urban Search and Rescue Response System,"70 Fed. Reg. 9182 (Feb. 24, 2005) ("Interim Final Rule") as well as the provisions of the FEMA MOA. To the extent the Interim Final Rule is contrary to the FEMA MOA, the Interim Final Rule will prevail. Upon the effective date of the Final Rule governing this subject ("Final Rule"),the Final Rule shall supersede the Interim Final Rule and shall prevail over any contrary provisions of the Interim Final Rule or the FEMA MOA. 2.7 Definitions of Terms. Capitalized words and phrases in this Agreement have the same meaning as they do in the Interim Final Rule, unless or until superseded by the Final Rule. 2 Capitalized words and phrases not defined in the Interim Final Rule or the Final Rule have the meaning given in this Agreement. 3. AGREED TERMS AND CONDITIONS 3.1 Participating Agency. 3.1.1 Participating Agency agrees to provide personnel to serve in certain designated positions on the Task Force as determined by Sponsoring Agency. A list of the individuals who will occupy those designated positions, and who are referred to in this Agreement as"Participants or authorized members," as well as other pertinent information about them is contained in Appendix A. 3.1.2 Participating Agency further agrees that Participants will meet the required qualifications for the positions to be filled, will receive the required training specified in this Agreement and will satisfy other conditions of preparedness and response as required by the Sponsoring Agency as listed in Appendix B. 3.1.3 The Parties will cooperate with each other so as to facilitate achievement of the goals and objectives of the System as fully and completely as possible. 3.2 Third Party Liability and Workers' Compensation. 3.2.1 Participating Agency and its Participants shall be afforded such coverage for third party liability and workers'compensation as is afforded all Task Forces and their System Members under Federal law, the scope of which is generally described in the Interim Final Rule. 3.2.2 Except as afforded by the Federal Government,the responsibility for risks associated with claims for third party liability and workers'compensation arising out of participation in the Task Force, either organizationally by the Participating Agency or Individually by its Participants, shall be the responsibility of Participating Agency and not under any circumstances, the responsibility of Sponsoring Agency. At all times, Participating Agency shall maintain in full force and effect, and provided proof thereof, for the benefit of its Participants and its other employees engaged in System activities, coverage for workers compensation and third party liability to the full extent required by law. 3.3 Financial Provisions. 3.3.1 Preparedness Funds 3.3.1.1 In its sole discretion, Sponsoring Agency may distribute to Participating Agency such preparedness grant funding as Sponsoring Agency shall be eligible to and does receive from FEMA. Any such 3 distributions shall be subject to the requirements of the preparedness grants and the needs of the Task Force generally. 3.3.1.2 Any other funding received by Sponsoring Agency from sources other than the federal government may also be made available as Sponsoring Agency determines in its discretion. Sponsoring Agency shall make such distributions fairly and equitably taking into account the mission, goals and objectives of the Task Force and the needs of the Sponsoring Agency as compared to other proper needs and demands. 3.3.2 Response Funds 3.3.2.1 Sponsoring Agency shall promptly reimburse Participating Agency for response expenses that are authorized to be incurred by or for the benefit of Participants engaged in Task Force activities, upon receiving reimbursement for such expenses from the federal government. Such expenses must be properly ascertained, accumulated and reported to the Sponsoring Agency, and the funds to be utilized for payment must have been reimbursed by or on behalf of FEMA to Sponsoring Agency. 3.3.2.2 After an Activation, Participating Agency shall provide Sponsoring Agency with a complete cost reimbursement package to be submitted by Sponsoring Agency as part of an overall claim package which Sponsoring Agency is obliged to submit to FEMA. The Participating Agency's cost reimbursement package shall be submitted to the Sponsoring Agency within 60days after the end of the Personnel Rehabilitation Period established by FEMA. Participating Agency's cost reimbursement package shall be prepared in conformance with applicable federal directives which Sponsoring Agency shall disseminate to Participating Agency. See Appendix C for reimbursement procedures and applicable Federal Directives for compensation. 3.3.2.3 Participating Agency shall provide Sponsoring Agency with employee compensation information for its Participants at least annually, or as changes occur in compensation rates payable to Participants. That information and other pertinent Participant data required by Sponsoring Agency shall be provided in an updated version of Appendix D. 3.3.2.4 To ensure proper reimbursement from FEMA, the compensation of Participants on the Task Force shall be in accordance with pay schedules and policies established by the Final Interim Rule from the time of activation and until the Task Force returns, is deactivated and Participants are returned to regular work schedules. 4 3.3.2.5 All financial commitments of Sponsoring Agency are subject to the availability and receipt of funds by Sponsoring Agency from FEMA and other sources. 3.3.2.6 Neither Participating Agency nor any Participant shall be reimbursed for costs incurred outside the scope of this Agreement. 3.4 Reporting And Record Keeping Requirements. 3.4.1 The Participating Agency shall provide the Sponsoring Agency with the records described in Appendix E. 3.4.2 The Sponsoring Agency shall issue a Task Force Picture identification Card for all authorized members listed in Appendix A. 3.4.3 Participating Agency and Sponsoring Agency shall ensure that any medical or other records and information that are afforded confidentiality under applicable law are protected from unauthorized disclosure. 3.4.4 Participating Agency shall provide prompt and accurate reporting as specified in this Agreement as outlined in Appendix C, D and F. 3.5 Mandatory Minimum Requirements For Participation. Each Participant must satisfy all of the following for participation on the Task Force. 3.5.1 Each Participant shall be an employee in good standing of the Participating Agency. Entry-level employees who are probationary or in a similar status are not eligible. 3.5.2 Each Participant shall be of good moral character and shall not have been convicted of any felony or any other criminal offense involving moral turpitude. 3.5.3 Participants serving in a Task Force position that requires the individual to hold a license, registration, certificate or other similar authorization to lawfully engage in an activity must hold the appropriate authorization, which must be current and validly issued. 3.5.4 Subject to any applicable FEMA standards, each Participant must meet the medical/fitness standards mutually agreed upon by Sponsoring Agency and Participating Agency and not have any medical condition or disability that will prevent performance of the duties of the Task Force position he/she occupies. 3.5.5 Each Participant must be available on short notice to mobilize within 2 hours of request and be able to respond on a mission for up to 14 days. 5 3.5.6 Each Participant must be capable of improvising and functioning for long hours under adverse working conditions. 3.5.7 Each Participant must receive such inoculations as are specified by the DHS/FEMA in Appendix G. 3.5.8 Each Participant must be aware of the signs, symptoms and corrective measures of Critical Incident Stress Syndrome. 3.5.9 Each Participant must understand and adhere to safe working practices and procedures as required in the urban disaster environment. 3.5.10 Each Participant must have a working knowledge of the US&R System and the Task Force's organizational structure, operating procedures, safety practices, terminology and communication protocols. 3.5.11 Each Participant must have completed such courses of education and training and other requirements as FEMA shall specify. 3.5.12 Sponsoring Agency has authority to immediately suspend or terminate a Participant's participation on the Task Force for failure to satisfy any mandatory requirement. 3.6 Clothing and Equipment. 3.6.1 Sponsoring Agency will issue to each Participant certain items of personal protective clothing and equipment, as outlined in the WATF-1 "Activation Manual", for use in Task Force activities and operations. In the event of Activation, Participant shall provide certain additional items of personal clothing and equipment. Items of clothing and equipment supplied by Sponsoring Agency shall remain the property of Sponsoring Agency and shall be returned promptly whenever a person ceases to be a Participant. 3.6.2 Subject to FEMA requirements, all uniforms will display the official patch of the Task Force and the official patch of the US&R system, as specified by FEMA. The Sponsoring Agency shall specify the design of the uniform and any identifying insignia or markings. 3.7 Command, Control and Coordination. 3.7.1 When a Participant has been activated or has otherwise been placed at the direction, control and funding of FEMA, such as, for example, during participation in FEMA sponsored training, the ultimate authority for command, control and coordination of the service of the Participant reposes with FEMA exercised through the system chain of command. Subject to the principle just stated,the following provisions of this Section 3.7 govern the responsibilities of the parties with respect to supervisory, disciplinary and other specified aspects of the 6 Participant's employment within the context of his/her participation on the Task Force 3.7.2 Sponsoring Agency shall exercise direct supervisory authority over Participants during Activations, deployments and other activities of the Task Force conducted by Sponsoring Agency, but for disciplinary purposes, that authority is limited to temporary suspension or permanent exclusion from participation. In all other instances where disciplinary action may be necessary, Sponsoring Agency shall report the pertinent circumstances to Participating Agency,which shall cooperate with Sponsoring Agency and shall administer discipline as appropriate in accordance with the Participating Agency's established rules and regulations. 3.7.3 Nothing in this Agreement is intended to, nor does it, affect the employer- employee relationship between Participating Agency and its employees who are Participants, and Participating Agency shall at all times continue to be fully responsible for all of its employment obligations to its employee Participants, including the compensation and benefits that the Participating Agency has agreed to provide. 3.7.4 While participating in System activities conducted by the Task Force, Participants shall be subject to and observe and comply with all lawful orders and directions of the authorized representatives of Sponsoring Agency and the Task Force. Sponsoring Agency retains the right to suspend or exclude any Participant from participation on the Task Force for cause including failure to abide by the provisions of this Agreement. 3.8 Media and Information Policy. 3.8.1 Subject to applicable law, including FEMA regulations and directives, all photographs and video taken during a deployment will be kept under the control of Sponsoring Agency until use in internal or external education programs or other dissemination is approved by FEMA. 3.8.2 All applicable federal, state, and local media policies will be strictly enforced and followed. 3.8.3 Subject to applicable rules and regulations, Sponsoring Agency will have the primary responsibility for coordination of media coverage and liaison with media sources and representatives concerning activities of the Task Force. Sponsoring Agency shall endeavor to expose all Participating Agencies to favorable media coverage opportunities. 7 3.9 Rules of Conduct. 3.9.1 All Participants will be expected to abide by the code of conduct established by FEMA and the Sponsoring Agency. 3.9.2 The failure of a Participant to abide by the rules of conduct constitutes a violation of the US&R code of conduct and may result in suspension or exclusion from the Task Force under Section 3.7 above. 3.10 Preparedness Activities. 3.10.1 Sponsoring Agency shall conduct Task Force management, administration, training, equipment procurement and other preparedness activities required by FEMA. Participating Agency and its Participants shall cooperate with Sponsoring Agency and shall participate in the activities as necessary to achieve Task Force preparedness goals and objectives. 3.10.2 Specific training activities to be conducted, respectively, by Sponsoring Agency and by Participating Agency, including training, administration and reporting requirements, are contained in Appendix E 3.10.3 As established by System directives but subject to the availability of federal funding, Sponsoring Agency shall procure and maintain required caches of equipment and supplies. The contents of these caches shall be utilized for deployments of the Task Force and, subject to federal rules and regulations, will be made available for training activities of Sponsoring Agency and Participating Agency. Participants shall use Task Force cache equipment and supplies only for authorized purposes and shall exercise reasonable care to protect and preserve the property against loss or damage. The Participating Agency shall be financially accountable for any Task Force property that is lost or damaged due to negligence or unauthorized use by the Participating Agency or its authorized personnel. 3.11 Notification Procedures and Other Communications. 3.11.1 Alerts and Activation. 3.11.1.1 Sponsoring Agency's commander/chief executive officer or his/her designee shall determine whether the Task Force is capable of and will respond to Activation Orders. 3.11.1.2 Participating Agency shall maintain at all times a "Point of Notification"for receipt of notices from Sponsoring Agency concerning possible deployments of the Task Force. The Point of Notification shall include 24-hour telephonic and electronic capabilities. Information concerning the Participating Agency Point of Notification shall be set forth in Appendix F. 8 3.11.1.3 Upon receipt of Alert or Activation Orders, Sponsoring Agency shall give prompt telephonic and electronic notice to Participating Agency's Point of Notification. The notice shall designate the Task Force positions for which Participating Agency's Participants are being requisitioned, the location of the assembly point, and to the extent known, the nature and character of the Activation. 3.11.1.4 Participating Agency shall at all times maintain the capability of providing requisitioned Participants for participation on a deployment of the Task Force. 3.11.1.5 Upon receipt of an Activation Order for the Task Force, Participating Agency shall cause the required Participants to respond to the assembly point designated in the notice. 3.11.2 Mobilization. 3.11.2.1 All requisitioned Participants will respond to the designated assembly point within 2 hours of notification with all required personal clothing and equipment and required documentation. 3.11.2.2 Participating Agency will select its Participants through a pre- established selection system that ensures the requisition is promptly filled with fully qualified Participants. 3.11.2.3 Selected Participants will be subject to a pre-deployment medical screening. Any Participant who fails the screening will not be deployed. 3.11.2.4 Sponsoring Agency retains the sole right to determine which Participating Agency personnel, if any, will respond with the Task Force when Activated. 3.11.3 Other Communications. Sponsoring Agency will remain in contact with Participating Agency through the Participating Agency Point of Notification during the period of Activation. 3.12 Critical Incident Stress Syndrome ("CISS") and Management. 3.12.1 Sponsoring Agency will have primary responsibility to provide CISS training, intervention and support, before, during and after activation. 3.12.2 Costs incurred for unauthorized CISS activities are not eligible for reimbursement. 9 4. GENERAL PROVISIONS 4.1 Effective Date. This Agreement shall be effective [date], and when it has been duly and regularly authorized and executed by both parties. 4.2 Authority. As more specifically indicated above and below, this Agreement is made (a) pursuant to the provisions of the Interim Final Rule or the Final Rule; and (b) under the authority of Washington State law, in furtherance of the purposes of the National Urban Search and Rescue Response System, 4.3 Contents of the Agreement. Upon its execution, the Agreement consists of this Agreement, along with the following Appendices and other attachments, if any: 4.3.1 Appendix "A"— Roster of personnel updated twice annually on January 30 and June 30 each year with name of individual and task force position. Participating agency may not exceed number of personnel authorized by Sponsoring Agency. 4.3.2 Appendix"B"— List of general training required for all participants which identifies who is responsible for providing funding and to what extent. A list of position specific, FEMA sponsored or sanctioned training and the financial responsibility associated with each course] 4.3.3 Appendix"C"—Cost reimbursement procedures required by sponsoring agency in accordance with final interim Rule and Pierce county budget and Finance policy and procedures 4.3.4 Appendix"D"=Compensation rates updated annually for each participant from the participating agency. 4.3.5 AAQpendix E— List of required documents and records from participating agency for each participant to include required certificates, licenses, Continuing education credits. 4.3.6 Appendix F— List of participating agency contacts to be updated twice annually on January 30 and June 30 each year. 4.3.7 Appendix G— Directive 2005-008, Medical screening requirements 4.4 Amendments and Termination. 4.4.1 Except as otherwise expressly provided, this Agreement may be modified or amended only by another written agreement approved and executed by both parties, and all such amendments will be attached to this Agreement. 4.4.2 Term and Termination. The Agreement shall continue in effect unless and until terminated as provided in this Agreement. The Agreement may be terminated by 10 either party upon 30 days written notice, except that Participating Agency may not terminate this Agreement without the written consent of Sponsoring Agency during any time interval when the Task Force has been placed on Alert status or has been Activated if the Alert or Activation affects Participants of the Participating Agency. 4.5 Miscellaneous Provisions. 4.5.1 The obligations of the Participating Agency set forth in this Agreement are non-delegable and may not be assigned to or assumed by any other person without the prior written consent of Sponsoring Agency. 4.5.2 Except and to the extent federal law controls, this Agreement shall be construed and enforced, as between the parties, according to the laws of the State of Washington. 4.5.3 No party shall engage in any conduct or activity in the performance of this Agreement or participation in the System that constitutes a conflict of interest under applicable federal, state or local law, rules and regulations. 4.5.4 Each party shall at all times observe and comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, rules and regulations. 4.5.5 Except as provided otherwise with respect to emergency notifications, if it is necessary for the purposes of this Agreement for one of the named parties to give notice to the other named party, notice shall be in writing with the expenses of delivery or mailing fully prepaid and shall be delivered by personal service or a form of public or private mail service requiring proof of delivery. Notice is effective upon personal delivery, or by mail service, on the date of either actual receipt or five days after posting, whichever is first. Unless changed in writing in accordance with this Section, notice shall be served on the party at the address shown in Sections 1.1 and 1.2 of this Agreement. 4.5.6 Titles and section headings are for convenience only and are not a part of the parties'Agreement. 4.5.7 Should any provision of this Agreement be determined to be invalid or unenforceable under applicable law, the provision shall, to the extent required, be severed from the remainder of the Agreement which shall continue in full force and effect. 4.5.8 This Agreement and its provisions are binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties and to their respective successors in interest, provided, however, this Agreement does not and will not bestow any rights or remedies upon persons to whom an unlawful delegation or assignment has been made by Participating Agency. 11 4.5.9 This Agreement is made for the sole and exclusive benefit of the named parties and their lawful successors in interest, and no other person or entity is intended to, nor shall such other person or entity acquire or be entitled to receive any rights or benefits as a third-party beneficiary of this Agreement. 4.5.10 Neither the United States of America or the State of Washington is a party to this Agreement. 4.5.11 Each person executing this Agreement represents that: he/she was and is lawfully authorized to sign the Agreement on behalf of the party he/she represents; execution of the Agreement was duly and regularly authorized by the party's governing body; and,to the person's best knowledge and belief the Agreement is a binding and enforceable obligation of the party on whose behalf he/she acted. 4.5.12 Each party represents to the other: that the party has fully read and understood all of the provisions of this Agreement including the Appendices and other attachments, if any; that the party has secured and considered such legal advice and other expert counsel as the party deemed necessary and advisable for these purposes; and, that in agreeing to execute and become a signatory to this Agreement the party has deemed itself adequately informed and advised as to all of the risks assumed and obligations undertaken pursuant to this Agreement. 4.5.13 This Agreement, including the Appendices and attachments, if any, constitutes the entire agreement between the parties and it supersedes any prior agreements on this matter. 12 5. Execution This Agreement was executed by the parties on the dates shown below. SPONSORING AGENCY: Date: ( 1 By. Title: And By Title: PARTICIPATING AGENCY: Date: ( 1 By: Title: And By Title: 13 Appendix A WATF 1 Personnel Roster CITY OF KENT ROSTERED PERSONNEL NAME WATF1 POSITION Dominic V Marzano Task Force Leader Michael Scott Safety Officer Brian Kruml Rescue Squad Officer Brian Dodge Technical Information Specialist Patrick"Rick" Cox Canine Handler Marshal "Scott" Dellinger Rescue Specialist Martin Smale Rescue Specialist Martin Oliver Logistics Specialist Steve Smith Task Force Driver John Robbins Task Force Driver 14 Appendix B Training responsibilities Sponsoring agency responsibility FEMA Sponsored, Sanctioned, Equivalent, approved training 1. The sponsoring agency will provide funding for travel, lodging and meals for all FEMA sponsored and FEMA sanctioned training for participating members selected to attend by the Sponsoring Agency as funding from the CA permits. Salary expense to include backfill or overtime is not authorized 2. The sponsoring agency will provide funding for travel, lodging and meals for FEMA approved and FEMA Equivalent training on a case by case basis and only with prior approval as funding from the CA permits. Salary expense to include backfill or overtime is not authorized 3. The sponsoring agency will provide funding for travel, lodging, meals and wages to include overtime or backfill for hours worked only, for training that is required to maintain a certification. Salary expenses are authorized only if the training is unique to the task force and is not a requirement of the individuals participating agency as a condition of continued employment and as funding from the CA permits. 4. The Sponsoring agency will provide funding for expenses to include overtime or backfill for mobilization exercises and other activities identified on a case by case basis and as funding from the CA permits. 5. The Sponsoring Agency will financially support only the authorized members from a participating agency, identified in Appendix C, and no more than the allowed 3 deep for each functional position on the FEMA US&R approved Task Force compliment. • Authorized members from the participating agency must be identified by name as well as position and the list must be updated twice annually on January 30 and June 30 by the participating agency. • An individual may hold only a single position on the task force. The only exception to this rule is that a member may also hold a position as a CDL driver. • A maximum of 210 positions have been identified and each participating agency is authorized to have on the task force a set number of positions which they are allowed to fill with qualified personnel. Thirty additional positions are allocated for CDL drivers. The US&R Task Force Readiness Cooperative Agreement specifies the number of authorized personnel. • The specific positions available for a participating agency to fill are determined by the Task Force Leaders from Seattle, King County and Pierce County in consultation with the participating agency. 15 General requirements I Sponsoring Agency 1. Inoculations: The sponsoring agency will provide funding for the expense of obtaining the required inoculations. Reimbursement for salary to include overtime or backfill for the time required to obtain them is NO authorized for these individuals. See appendix J for list of required inoculations. 2. Hazmat Operations: The Sponsoring Agency will provide annual refresher training for First Responder Operations Level Hazardous Materials per OSHA standard 1910.120, Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response if a participant would not normally receive that training as a condition of employed by a first response organization. Reimbursement for salary to include overtime or backfill is authorized for these individuals. 3. US&R orientation: Four hours of training will be provided by the Sponsoring Agency. Salary expense to include reimbursement for backfill or overtime is authorized. 4. Annual quantitative Fit testing: The Sponsoring Agency will provide opportunity to fit test the Task Force Scott Face pieces and will issue a certificate of refresher training per 29 CFR 1910.134. Reimbursement for salary to include overtime or backfill is not authorized. Every effort will be made to provide fit testing opportunities to individuals who are on duty and at a location within their area of responsibility. 5. FEMA US&R WMD enhanced operations: Training will be provided by the Sponsoring Agency. Salary expense to include backfill or overtime reimbursement is authorized. 6. Water rescue operations: Awareness level training for will be provided by the sponsoring agency. Salary expense to include backfill or overtime reimbursement will be authorized 7. Confined space: Awareness level training for will be provided for individuals who do not receive this training from their agency as a condition of employment or who do not have operations or technician level confined space training as required by their position description. Reimbukement for salary to include backfill or overtime expenses will be authorized. 8. GPS: Awareness level training will be provided. Reimbursement for salary to include backfill or overtime expenses will be authorized 9. Biennial medical screening: The Sponsoring Agency contracts with a medical service provider for this purpose. (Appendix J) • All participants who do not receive medical screening as a condition of employment will receive this service according to the process outlined in Appendix J. • Expenses associated with medical screening requirements that exceed a participating agencies medical screening process will be reimbursable by the Sponsoring Agency. • Reimbursement for salary to include backfill or overtime expenses will not be authorized 16 Participating Agency Responsibility 1 General Requirements Authorized members will be allowed to attend FEMA Sponsored and FEMA Sanctioned training as staffing allows, when the opportunity presents itself and when the training is an identified requirement for the specific position on the task force. Participating agency's are responsible for an authorized member's salary or backfill expense and it is not eligible for reimbursement from the Sponsoring Agency. Participating agencies are responsible for a participant meeting the general training requirements listed below 1. Must be Physically fit to perform the duties assigned without accommodations 2 Must be available on short notice to mobilize within 2 hours to the point of assembly, be self sufficient for at least 72 hours and be available for a response assignment of up to 10 days. 3. Must be capable of improvising and functioning for long hours under adverse conditions. 4. Must be able to function safely at heights and on and around rubble. 5. Participating agency must provide certificate of training or letter signed by their agency, showing an individual has been provided training to make them aware of the signs and symptoms of Critical Incident Stress Syndrome. 6. Provide and maintain a current certificate for American Heart Association or equivalent CPR, Basic Life Support. 7. Provide a current certificate of training or agency letter as proof of annual refresher training for First Responder Operations Level Hazardous Materials per OSHA standard 1910.120, Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response if employed by a first response organization and if it is required as a condition of employment. 8. Certificates of completion for IS 100, IS 200, IS 700 and IS 800 on line courses must be on file with the sponsoring agency. Salary expense to include backfill or overtime reimbursement is not authorized for taking these courses. 9. Participating agencies will schedule authorized members to attend annual fit testing opportunities while the individual is working and on duty to reduce expense. 10. Participating agencies will provide certificates of completion for DOJ Emergency Response to Terrorism, Basic Concepts or equivalent. Salary expense to include backfill or overtime is not authorized 11. Rescue Systems 1 training is a requirement for all members and is the responsibility of the participating agency. Tuition and Salary expense to include backfill or overtime is not authorized. 12. Participating Agencies that have an annual or bi annual medical screening program will provide a fit for duty letter signed by the agencies medical service provider per FEMA directive 2005-008. See appendix J 17 Participating agency responsibility 1 Position Specific Requirements If an individual must maintain a certificate or license as a condition of employment it is the responsibility of the Participating Agency to forward to the Sponsoring Agency a copy of updated license or certification. Examples are; • Hazmat Medical Surveillance • Annual EMT CE's • EMT Certification • Medical Licensure • CPR Recertification every three years 18 Appendix C Reimbursement procedures The Sponsoring Agency will reimburse a Participating Agency in accordance with the language of the Interim Rule in a timely manner upon receipt of accurate and complete required documentation of expenses. Only actual expenses authorized will be reimbursed. Equipment expenses • All purchases related to activation must be processed and approved by the Sponsoring Agency and must be items located on the DHS/FEMA approved US&R cache list. • Purchase orders must include the cache item number associated with the purchased equipment. • Cache item numbers are located on the current cache list which can be found in the WATF 1 web portal. For every equipment item procured, there must be proper supporting documentation to receive reimbursement including, purchase orders, requisitions, and invoices from the vendors with appropriate authorizing signatures. • If an equipment purchase exceeds the item's cost cap, the purchasing agent must receive in advance Sponsoring Agency approval and provide written justification to the Sponsoring Agency for documentation purposes. • Requests for purchase or maintenance of equipment and supplies not appearing on the equipment cache list, or that exceed the number specified in the equipment cache list, must be made in writing to the DHS/FEMA US&R Program Manager. • No Federal funds provided under any preparedness cooperative agreement may be expended to purchase or maintain any equipment or supply item unless: 1. The equipment and supplies directly support the Sponsoring Agencies US&R capability, or 2. The DHS/FEMA US&R Program Manager approves the expenditure and gives written notice of his or her approval to the Sponsoring Agency before the participating agency, or Sponsoring Agency purchases the equipment or supply item. • The Sponsoring Agency is responsible for compiling all reimbursement claims. For each invoice, the Sponsoring Agency will provide a cover sheet. The invoice cover sheet will itemize each item purchased. A summary document will be provided to list all invoices submitted. Salary and Wage reimbursement • Salaries and Backfill reimbursement for Readiness activities shall be reimbursed as specified above and in accordance with the Participating Agency's standard pay policy. The Sponsoring Agency retains the right to modify reimbursement levels for each Readiness activity based on Cooperative Agreement funding availability and other mitigating factors. • Salaries and Backfill reimbursement for Activation activities shall be reimbursed in accordance with the Participating Agency's standard pay policy and all rules as specified in 19 the Interim Rule. Furthermore, the Participating Agency must prepare and submit to the Sponsoring Agency, in the proper claim format, all requests for reimbursements within 60 days after the Rehabilitation Period has ended. The Sponsoring Agency will provide the Participating Agency the most current format available at time of activation. Proof of salaries/benefits/backfill payments to Activated Personnel and backfill personnel must be submitted as part of the reimbursement claim request packet. • The Sponsoring Agency will submit a full claim reimbursement request to DHS/FEMA. Upon completion of review by DHS/FEMA, the Sponsoring Agency will process payments to the Participating Agency based on the final claim approval by DHS/FEMA. • The Participating Agency can request the Sponsoring Agency submit an appeal of any un- allowed expenses within 30 days of receiving notification of an exception to the original reimbursement claim amount. Additional documentation or explanation must accompany the appeal request. 1 1 20 Appendix D Compensation Rates WATF 1 Personnel Roster CITY OF KENT ROSTERED PERSONNEL COMPENSATION NAME WATF1 POSITION COMPENSATION RATE Dominic V Marzano Task Force Leader Fully Loaded Standard Hourly Rate- $55.686 Michael Scott Safety Officer Fully Loaded Standard Hourly Rate- $57.030 Brian Kruml Rescue Squad Officer Fully Loaded Standard Hourly Rate- $37.929 Brian Dodge Technical Info Specialist Fully Loaded Standard Hourly Rate- $35.915 Patrick"Rick"Cox Canine Handler Fully Loaded Standard Hourly Rate- $35.915 Marshal "Scott' Rescue Specialist Fully Loaded Standard Hourly Rate- Dellinger $31.163 Martin Smale Rescue Specialist Fully Loaded Standard Hourly Rate- $32.321 Martin Oliver Logistics Specialist Fully Loaded Standard Hourly Rate- $31.453 Steve Smith Task Force Driver Fully Loaded Standard Hourly Rate- $31.742 John Robbins Task Force Driver Fully Loaded Standard Hourly Rate- $32.321 21 Appendix E Required documents and records from Participating agency 1. On Agency letterhead, verification of"General Training Requirements'for rostered personnel. 2. Certificates of completion for requirements listed in the"Position Description Directive" dated 2008-05, or any subsequent revisions of this document. 3. Participating Agencies that have an annual or bi annual medical screening program will provide a fit for duty letter signed by the agencies medical service provider per FEMA directive 2005. This is to include a respiratory questionnaire. 22 Appendix F List of participating agency contacts Participating agency: City of Kent, Washington Address 220 V Ave South Kent,WA 98032 Phone 253-856-4300 Point of Contact Jim Schneider, Fire Chief Dominic V Marzano, AC TFL WATF1 Mike Scott, BC SO WATF1 23 Appendix G Medical Screening Medical Screening of all authorized members is required annually by DHS/ FEMA US&R program directive. Departments with an existing annual medical screening program; • WATF-1 will reimburse Task Force member's agency for any required additional medical testing that is not currently provided under the agency's existing program. The Department may bill WATF-1 with a single billing for all of its authorized members for the additional testing required by FEMA. • WATF-1 will reimburse agencies for expenses incurred up to but no more than the current contracted prices from the Sponsoring Agencies Contracted Medical Service Provider. • Individual Task Force members may not submit medical bills for reimbursement—only participating agency bills will be accepted. Departments without an existing annual medical screening program • Authorized members without existing health screening from their Participating Agency will be required to use the Sponsoring Agency's contracted medical service provider for health screening. Required testing includes; • Vital signs and standard physical examination • Laboratory o CBC, Differential platelets o Chemistry panel to include liver&renal function tests ■ Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) ■ Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) ■ Alkaline Phosphatase (AlkPhos) ■ Gamma-Glutamyl Transpeptidase (GGTP) ■ Total and direct Bilirubin ■ creatinine ■ blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) ■ Glucose ■ electrolytes, (Na, K, Cl, Co2) ■ Total protein ■ Albumin ■ Calcium. • Urinalysis (urine dip, microscopic if indicated) • Urine heavy metal screen, (qualitative, spot urine). HAZMAT task Force members only o Spirometry o Chest x-ray (PA and Lateral) To establish baseline, Does not need to be repeated annually unless medically indicated • Resting 12-lead ECG 24 o Stress 12-lead ECG (as indicated, stratified by age above 46 years, or coronary artery disease risk factor assessment in accordance with sponsoring agency policy) o RBC cholinesterase (initial baseline or additional testing if medically indicated) does not need to be repeated annually unless medically indicated. o HBsAB Hepatitis B Surface Antibody, (validation of hepatitis B immunity) Titer need only be done once unless previously documented and greater than 10mU/ml; Administer Hepatitis B vaccine series if titer less than 10 mU/ml and repeat approximately 6 weeks after vaccination series. Frequency: All current and future newly assigned US&R task force members shall receive the minimum baseline health screening to be repeated annually unless procedure is to establish , baseline. The need for post deployment interval screening will be determined by the presence of symptoms or based upon mission risk assessment by the Incident Support Team Medical and Safety Officers and consultants like CDC, NIOSH, OSHA, and EPA. Vaccinations and TB Screening • PPD (TB skin Test) annually • Influenza A& B (Seasonal) • Tetanus Toxoid or teanus/diptheria (Td) every 10 years • MMR (measles, Mumps and Rubella) • Polio (OPV or eIPV) • Hepatitis A & B • Varicella (or personal history of illness or prior antibody titer) Documentation of MMR, polio, hepatitis A&B and varicella by reported history and signed by the Authorized member should be reasonable proof of vaccination if other documentation is not available. Vaccination declination must be documented in TF occupational health records. 25 Kent City Council Meeting Date October 21, 2008 Category Consent Calendar - 60 1. SUBJECT: WESTERN PETERBILT, INC. PURCHASING AGREEMENT - AUTHORIZE 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Authorize the Mayor to sign the purchase agreement with Western Peterbilt, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $122,000 for the purchase of a Class 7 Medium-Duty Tractor. The current hazard materials unit is 18 years-old, has reached the end of its life span and is undersized for the equipment that is carried to assist in mitigating today's hazardous materials incidents. The replacement of the hazardous materials unit was identified in the Fire Department Apparatus Replacement Fund to be replaced in 2007 and is being replaced in 2008 through a separate consent calendar item (Item 6P). The purchase of the Class 7 Medium-Duty tractor will allow the department to tow the hazardous materials trailer. Two (2) competitive bids for the purchase of the Class 7 Medium-Duty tractor were received. Negotiations were completed with Western Peterbilt, Inc. on the specifications and purchase contract. The City Attorney's Office has reviewed and approved the purchase contract. 3. A EXHIBITS: reement g 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Safety Committee 10/14/08 (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? X Revenue? Currently in the Budget? Yes X No 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE Y CIT OF KENT AND WESTERN PETERBILT, INC. FOR THE PURCHASE OF A CLASS 7 MEDIUM-DUTY TRACTOR THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by the City of Kent, a Washington municipal corporation, with its principle offices at 220 Fourth Avenue S., Kent, WA 98032-5895, hereinafter "City," and Western Peterbilt, Inc. with its principle place of business at Seattle, WA hereinafter "Successful Bidder". WITNESSETH: That in consideration of the payments, covenants, and agreements hereinafter mentioned, to be made or performed by the parties hereto, the parties covenant and agree to the following: 1. Term—Agreement The term "Agreement" as used herein, b'shall constitute this document entitled "Agreement between the City of Kent and Successful Bidder for the purchase of a "Class 7 Medium- Duty Tractor." Attachment A, entitled "Minimum Specifications for a Class 7 Medium-Duty Tractor" and Attachment B, entitled "Drawings" and Attachment C, entitled "Successful Bidder's Proposal" and Attachment D, entitled "Truck Manufacturer's Build Sheet" and Attachment E, entitled"Clarifications" 2. Term— "Class 7 Medium-Duty Tractor" This Agreement is for the purchase of one (1) "Class 7 Medium-Duty Tractor" that conforms to the terms of this Agreement. 3. Scope of Work Successful Bidder agrees to deliver to the City, one (1) fully functional "Class 7 Medium- Duty Tractor" that meets the specifications set forth in this Agreement and its various attachments. The City promises and agrees with Successful Bidder to engage Successful Bidder to provide the "Class 7 Medium-Duty Tractor" as described in this Agreement and to complete and finish the same according to the plans and specifications set forth in this Agreement and Attachment A. The parties agree that the "Class 7 Medium-DutyTractor" will conform with all Federal r � and local state Department of Transportation rules and regulations in effect at the time of signing of the Agreement. 4. Delivery and Risk of Loss Successful Bidder agrees to deliver to the City one (1) fully functional "Class 7 Medium- Duty Tractor" that conforms to the specifications set forth in this Agreement within 120 calendar days from the date of signing of this Agreement, F.O.B. at the trailer manufacturer's facility in Walled Lake, MI. The risk of loss for any defect or damage to the "Class 7 Medium-Duty Tractor" shall remain with Successful Bidder until the "Class 7 Medium-Duty Tractor" is accepted by the City. 5. Payment and Options The total amount to be paid for the "Class 7 Medium-Duty Tractor" is $101,845.00, plus any applicable sales tax. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of acceptance of the "Class 7 Medium-Duty Tractor" by the City. Payment shall be made by the City directly to the party designated on the invoice. 6. Preconstruction Successful Bidder shall provide and pay the expenses for travel by air, meals, and accommodations for two (2) representatives of the City to sit down with the manufacturer's representatives at their facility to review the specifications, so all parties have a clear understanding of the City's proposal. 7. Inspection The City is entitled to inspect the Class 7 Medium-Duty Tractor at the Successful Bidder's manufacturing facility before delivery is made to the trailer's manufacturing facility. Successful Bidder shall provide and pay the expenses for travel by air, meals, and accommodations for two (2) representatives of the City to inspect the "Class 7 Medium- Duty Tractor" at the Successful Bidder's manufacturing facility during normal working hours. Successful Bidder shall allow one full day, each way, for travel. The City's representatives shall, at a minimum, be afforded eight (8) hours of time to inspect the "Class 7 Medium-Duty Tractor". The Successful Bidder will have eight (8) hours to cure any deficiencies the City's representatives identify. Additional inspection time shall be afforded for the inspection of any item that is identified by a City's representatives to be defective or doesn't meet specifications. All deficiencies shall be corrected prior to the "Class 7 Medium-Duty Tractor" leaving the manufacturer's facility. If the Successful Bidder needs more than eight (8) hours to cure the deficiencies, the Successful Bidder shall cover all expenses of the City's representatives for an additional day. If the deficiencies are not corrected within the two (2) days, the Successful Bidder shall fly the City's representatives home. Once the deficiencies are corrected the Successful Bidder shall notify the Kent Fire Department and fly two (2) of its representatives back to the Successful Bidder's manufacturingfacility to re-inspect. T ty p he Successful Bidder shall cover all traveling expenses, meals, and lodging if there is a re-inspection. Inspection periods shall include only the time that City representatives actually spend at the Successful Bidder's manufacturing facility inspecting the "Class 7 Medium-Duty Tractor". There shall be a post-delivery final inspection conducted at the City's premises to ensure that the "Class 7 Medium-Duty Tractor" conforms to the terms of this Agreement and passes all inspections and tests as required by the City or other laws or regulations. The initial post-delivery inspection and testing shall be completed within thirty (30) days of delivery of the "Class 7 Medium-Duty Tractor". In the event the "Class 7 Medium-Duty Tractor" fails to meet the tests as required by the City on first trials, second trials may be conducted by the City, at the sole option of the City, within thirty (30) days from the date of the first trials. Such trials shall be final and conclusive. Successful Bidder specifically agrees that its failure to afford the City the opportunity to p Y g tY Pp tY inspect the "Class 7 Medium-Duty Tractor" pursuant to the terms of this Agreement shall be sufficient cause, in and of itself, for the rejection of the "Class 7 Medium-Duty Tractor". Notwithstanding any right of inspection, Successful Bidder shall notify the City of any known or discoverable defect in the "Class 7 Medium-Duty Tractor" that exists on the date it is discovered. 8. Acceptance Acceptance of the "Class 7 Medium-Duty Tractor" shall occur after the "Class 7 Medium-Duty Tractor" passes post-delivery inspections and tests. The fact that the City uses the "Class 7 Medium-Duty Tractor" for the inspection and tests shall not constitute acceptance. 9. Resection The City reserves the right to inspect the "Class 7 Medium-Duty Tractor" for any defects, irregularities, non-conformities, and defects in workmanship and appearance, and to reject a nonconforming or defective "Class 7 Medium-Duty Tractor". The City will notify Successful Bidder of the rejection of the "Class 7 Medium-Duty Tractor" in writing. The City will also provide Successful Bidder with a written description of the reason(s) for rejection. The City will hold the "Class 7 Medium-Duty Tractor" in its possession with reasonable care at Successful Bidder's disposition for a time sufficient to permit Successful Bidder to remove the "Class 7 Medium-Duty Tractor". If Successful Bidder gives no instructions within a reasonable time after notification of the rejection, the City will store the "Class 7 Medium-Duty Tractor" at Successful Bidder's expense and such expense shall become a security interest in favor of the City. The parties understand that in the case of rejection, the City is not required to store the "Class 7 Medium-Duty Tractor" in an enclosed area. 10. Cure If the City has rejected the "Class 7 Medium-Duty Tractor_" for a defect or non- conformity, or the "Class 7 Medium-Duty Tractor" has or develops a defect after acceptance of the "Class 7 Medium-Duty Tractor", Successful Bidder shall have thirty (30) days to cure the defect; provided, Successful Bidder provides the City written notice of Successful Bidder's intent to cure the defect and assures the City that it is capable of curing such defect. The City shall notify the Successful Bidder in writing of its discovery of any defect within thirty (30) days of the actual discovery of the defect. The cure of the defect shall be at the sole expense of the Successful Bidder, and Successful Bidder shall cover all costs of such cure. In the event the cure requires that the "Class 7 Medium-Duty Tractor" to be transported beyond the limits of the State of Washington, Successful Bidder shall, in addition to covering all costs of such cure, pay to the City $0.50.5 per mile that the "Class 7 Medium-Duty Tractor" is driven to cover the wear and tear on the "Class 7 Medium- Duty Tractor". Unless otherwise agreed to in a separate writing signed by the parties, Successful Bidder shall have one opportunity to cure each defect for which it has been placed on notice or which Successful Bidder discovers. Any agreement to cure defects of the "Class 7 Medium- Duty Tractor" shall not constitute a settlement of claims brought pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. If, at any time, Successful Bidder discovers a defect, Successful Bidder shall, within two (2) days of discovery, notify the City of such defects in writing and shall cure such defect, if Successful Bidder so chooses, pursuant to this section. 11. Warranty Successful Bidder warrants and guarantees that the "Class 7 Medium-Duty Tractor" will be manufactured in accordance with the specifications set forth in this Agreement. Successful Bidder further warrants that the "Class 7 Medium-Duty Tractor" shall remain free from defect or malfunction for a period of One (1) year , PROVIDED, that in the event any warranty that appears in the attachments to this Agreement, or a warranty issued by a component manufacturer, extends beyond One (1) year, in that attachment or issued by the component manufacturer shall prevail and shall not be limited by this paragraph. The implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose, as set forth in sections 62A.2-314 and-315 of the Revised Code of Washington, shall apply to the "Class 7 Medium-Duty Tractor". These implied warranties shall apply even though they may be disclaimed in an attachment to this Agreement, such that this section shall prevail over such disclaimer, and such disclaimer shall not apply. The inspection of or failure to inspect the "Class 7 Medium-Duty Tractor" shall not constitute a waiver or cancellation of the implied warranties If the "Class 7 Medium-Duty Tractor" or any component, unit, or subsystem is repaired, rebuilt, or replaced pursuant to this Agreement, such warranty work, component, unit, or subsystem shall have the remaining unexpired warranty of the original component, unit or Y g p ty subsystem. Successful Bidder shall provide all paperwork relating to warranty coverage of the "Class 7 Medium-Duty Tractor" or their components to the City upon delivery of the "Class 7 Medium-Duty Tractor". The warranty periods set forth in this Agreement shall not begin to run until the "Class 7 Medium-Duty Tractor" is placed in-service by the City. The City will promptly notify Successful Bidder of the date the "Class 7 Medium-Duty Tractor" is placed in-service and the mileage of the "Class 7 Medium-Duty Tractor" when it is placed in-service. The warranty period set forth in this Agreement shall not run during any period in which the "Class 7 Medium-Duty Tractor" is not functional due to a defect in the "Class 7 Medium- Duty Tractor" so long as the City places Successful Bidder on written notice of the defect. In the event a component manufacturer requires that the purchaser register its purchase with the manufacturer to make effective a component manufacturer's warranty, Successful Bidder shall take all steps necessary to register such purchase with the component manufacturer. In the event Successful Bidder fails to properly register the City's purchase with the component manufacturer, then Successful Bidder shall assume the status of warrantor of such component as if such registration had occurred. 12. Performance Bond Successful Bidder shall provide and execute a performance bond for the full contract amount. This performance bond shall: (1) Be signed by an approved surety (or sureties) that: a. Is registered with the Washington State Insurance Commissioner, and b. Appears on the current authorized Insurance List for the State of Washington published by the Office of the Washington Insurance Commissioner. (2) Be conditioned on the faithful performance of the contract by Successful Bidder within the prescribed time. (3) Guarantee that the surety shall indemnify, defend, and protect the City against any claim of direct or indirect loss resulting from the failure: a. Of Successful Bidder (or any of the employees, sub-contractors, volunteer sub-contractors of Successful Bidder) to faithfully perform the contract, and b. Of Successful Bidder or the sub-contractors) to ay all laborers, mechanics, ( p subcontractors, volunteers, material person, or any other person who provides supplies or provisions for carrying out the work. (4) The City may require the surety companies on the Performance Bond to appear and qualify themselves. When the City deems the surety or sureties to be inadequate, it may, upon written demand, require Successful Bidder to furnish additional surety to cover any remaining work. Until the added surety is furnished, payments on the contract will stop. (5) The parties agree that no liability shall attach to the City by reason of entering into this Agreement except as expressly provided herein. 13. Independent Contractor The parties intend that an independent contractor-employer relationship will be created by this Agreement. As Successful Bidder is customarily engaged in an independently established trade that encompasses the specific service provided to the City, no agent, employee, representative, or sub-contractor of Successful Bidder shall be or shall be deemed to be the employee, agent, representative, or sub-contractor of the City. In the performance of the work, Successful Bidder is an independent contractor with the ability to control and direct the performance and details of the work, the City being interested only in the results obtained under this Agreement. None of the benefits provided by the City to its employees, including, but not limited to, compensation, insurance, and unemployment insurance are available from the City to the employees, agents, representatives, or sub-contractors of Successful Bidder. Successful Bidder will be solely and entirely responsible for its acts and for the acts of Successful Bidder 's agents, employees, representatives, and sub-contractors during the performance of this Agreement. The City may, during the term of this Agreement, engage other independent contractors to perform similar work. 14. Non-Assignment Successful Bidder shall not assign this Agreement nor any part thereof, nor any monies due or to become due thereunder, without the prior written approval of the City. Successful Bidder shall not sublet any part of this Agreement without first having obtained the written consent of the City to do so. IN CASE SUCH CONSENT TO SUBLET ANY PART OF THIS AGREEMENT IS GIVEN BY THE CITY, IT SHALL IN NO WAY RELEASE SUCCESSFUL BIDDER FROM ANY RESPONSIBILITY UNDER THIS AGREEMENT, AND SUCCESSFUL BIDDER SHALL BE HELD IN ALL RESPECTS ACCOUNTABLE AS IF NO CONSENT HAS BEEN GIVEN. SUCCESSFUL BIDDER WILL BE REQUIRED TO GIVE PERSONAI,ATTENTION TO THE WORK THAT IS SUBLET. 15. Indemnification Successful Bidder shall defend, indemnify, and hold the City, it's officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers harmless from injury and all claims, injuries, damages, losses and suits includingall legal costs and attorney fees arising out of or in connection g Y g with the performance of this Agreement except for injuries and damages resulting from the sole negligence of the City. The City's inspection or acceptance of the "Class 7 Medium- Duty Tractor when completed will not be grounds to avoid any of these covenants of indemnification. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. The City shall: (1) promptly notify Successful Bidder of any claim for which indemnification may be sought; (2) cooperate fully in the defense of such claim; and (3) permit Successful Bidder to settle or compromise such claim on terms and conditions which, in good faith, it determines are appropriate. 16. Insurance Successful Bidder shall procure and maintain for the duration of this Agreement, insurance of the types and in the amounts described below against claims for injury to persons or damage to property that may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by Successful Bidder, its agents, representatives, employees, sub-consultants, or sub-contractors. Before beginning work on the project described in this Agreement, Successful Bidder shall provide a Certificate of Insurance evidencing: Commercial general liability insurance written on an occurrence basis with limits no less than $1,000,000.00 combined single limit per occurrence and $2,000,000.00 aggregate for personal injury, bodily injury, and property damage. Coverage shall include but not be limited to: Blanket contractual; products/completed operations/broad form property damage; explosion; and employer's liability. THE INSURANCE MUST REFER TO THE PROJECT NAME, PROJECT LOCATION AND CONTAIN A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT. ANY PAYMENT OF DEDUCTIBLE OF SELF-INSURED RETENTION SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF SUCCESSFUL BIDDER. The City, its officers, officials, agents, and volunteers shall be named as an additional insured on the insurance policy, as respects work performed by or on behalf of Successful Bidder and a copy of the endorsement naming the City as an additional insured shall be attached to the Certificate of Insurance. Successful Bidder's insurance shall contain a clause stating that coverage shall apply separately to each insured against whom a claim is made or suit is brought, except with respects to the limits of the insured's liability. Successful Bidder's insurance shall be primary insurance as respects the City, and the City shall be given thirty calendar day's prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, of any cancellation, suspension, or material change in coverage. The City also reserves it's unqualified right to require, at any time for any reason, proof of coverage in the form of a duplicate of the insurance policy with all endorsements of the insurance coverage. 17. Discrimination In the hiring of employees for the performance of work under this Agreement or any sub- contract hereunder, Successful Bidder, its sub-contractors, or any person acting on behalf of Successful Bidder or its sub-contractor shall not, by reason of race, religion, color, sex, national origin, or the presence of any sensory, mental, or physical disability, discriminate against any person who is qualified and available to perform the work to which the employment relates. Successful Bidder shall execute the attached City of Kent Equal Employment Opportunity Policy Declaration, Comply with City Administrative Policy 1.2, and upon completion of the contract work, file the attached Compliance Statement. 18. Severability If an term, provision, condition, or other portion of this Agreement, or it's application to Y p p g any person is held to be inoperative, invalid, or void, than the same shall not affect any other term, provision, condition, or any other portion of this Agreement or it's application to any person. 19. Cumulation of Remedies All remedies available to either party for breach of this Agreement are cumulative and may be exercised concurrently or separately, and the exercise of any one remedy shall not be deemed an election of such remedy to the exclusion of other remedies. 20. Non-Waiver of Breach No term or provision hereof shall be deemed waived and no breach consented to unless such waiver or consent shall be in writing and signed by the party claimed to have waived or consented. Any consent by any party, or waiver of, the breach of the other whether expressed or implied shall not constitute a continuing waiver of or consent to, nor excuse a different or subsequent breach. The failure of the City to enforce one portion of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver, or excuse the breach, of another portion of this Agreement. 21. Authority Each party has full power and authority to enter into and perform this Agreement, and the person signing this Agreement on behalf of each party has been properly authorized and empowered to enter into this Agreement. Each party further acknowledges that it has read this Agreement and understands and agrees to be bound b its terms. g g Y 22. Choice of Law This Agreement shall be exclusively governed and controlled by the laws of the City of Kent and the State of Washington, including, but not limited to, the State's Uniform Commercial Code as contained in Chapter 62A.2 RCW. To the extent that this Agreement conflicts with the provisions of Chapter 62A.2 RCW, the terms of this Agreement shall control. Jurisdiction and venue for any action relating to this Agreement shall exclusively be in the Superior Court for King County,Washington. 23. Termination This Agreement may be terminated in whole or in part: (a) By the City if Successful Bidder fails to deliver a conforming "Class 7 Medium- Duty Tractor" within thirty (30) days after the time for delivery specified in this Agreement or after thirty (30) days for a cure of any defect or non-conformity. The City shall notify Successful Bidder of the termination, the reasons thereof, and the effective date. (b) By the mutual written agreement of the City and Successful Bidder. The Agreement to terminate shall include the conditions of termination, the effective date, and in the case of termination in part, the portion to be terminated. r After the effective date of termination, no charges incurred under this Agreement, or terminated portions thereof, are allowable. 24. Liquidated Damages Liquidated damages at a rate of $100.00 per calendar day shall be assessed against Successful Bidder for the late performance of any condition or term set forth in this Agreement. Successful Bidder's delay in the performance of any term of this Agreement shall be excused if the cause of such delay is beyond the control of, and without the fault or negligence of, Successful Bidder, including weather, inability to obtain materials, strikes, acts of god, acts of the public enemy, acts of a government entity, fires, floods, and earthquakes. 25. Notice to Proceed Successful Bidder shall commence all work immediately upon execution of the Agreement and shall provide a performance bond, a copy of an insurance policy(ies)\certificate(s), a copy of the Equal Employment Opportunity Policy Declaration, and an additional insured endorsement. 26. Sales Tax The City shall be responsible for paying Washington State Sales Tax on the contract amount at a rate that is current when and where the unit is purchased. Sales tax collected by Successful Bidder will be subject to WAC 458-20-145, Special Rule No. 1. 27. Ownership and Title Upon acceptance of the "Class 7 Medium-Duty Tractor" and payment by the City pursuant to this Agreement, ownership and title of the "Class 7 Medium-Duty Tractor" shall pass to the City. 28. Modification This Agreement may only be amended or modified by the mutual written agreement of the parties. All amendments or modifications shall be signed by both parties and be attached to this Agreement. 29. Standard of Performance All work to be performed by Successful Bidder shall be performed in a workman-like manner in accordance with generally accepted professional practices in effect at the time such work is performed. 30. Notices Any notices to be delivered shall be directed to the attention of the following: CITY: City of Kent Fire Department: Attention: Jim Schneider, Pat Pawlak, Tom Arnson, Fire Chief Division Chief Mechanic Supervisor City of Kent 220 Fourth Avenue South Kent, WA 98032 31. Entire Agreement This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the City and Successful Bidder. With the exception of properly executed modifications, representations, either written or oral, that are not contained in this Agreement, shall not be considered part of this Agreement. 32. Conflict of Terms The terms of this Agreement, including the Attachments, shall be read together. Unless otherwise specified in this Agreement, in the event that any of the terms of the Agreement including the Attachments conflict with each other, the following shall be the order of precedence: The terms of this Document entitled "Agreement Between City of Kent and the Successful Bidder for the purchase of"Class 7 Medium-Duty Tractor" shall take precedence over the terms of any other portion of this Agreement. • Attachment A entitled "Minimum Specifications for a Class 7 Medium-Duty Tractor" shall take precedence over Attachments B, C, D, and E. • Attachment B entitled "Drawings" shall take precedence over Attachments C, D, and E. Attachment C entitled "Successful Bidder Proposal" shall take precedence over Attachments D and E. • Attachment D entitled "Truck Manufacturer's Build Sheets shall take precedence over Attachment E, entitled"Clarifications". IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year written below. If the dates written below do not coincide, the latest written date shall act as the effective date of this Agreement. SUCCESSFUL BIDDER CITY OF KENT By: By: Print Name: Suzette Cooke Title: Sales Representative Mayor Date: Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Arthur M. Fitzpatrick Deputy City Attorney ' Date: �. ATTEST: By: Brenda Jacober, City Clerk Date: DECLARATION CITY OF KENT EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY POLICY The City of Kent is committed to conform to Federal and State laws regarding equal opportunity. As such all contractors, subcontractors and suppliers who perform work with relation to this contract shall comply with the regulations of the City's equal employment opportunity policies. 1 The following questions specifically identify the requirements the City deems necessary for any contractor, subcontractor or supplier on this specific contract to adhere to. An affirmative response is required on all of the i following questions for this contract to be valid and binding. If any contractor, subcontractor or supplier willfully misrepresents themselves with regard to the directives outlines, it will be considered a breach of contract and it will be at the City's sole determination regarding suspension or termination for all or part of the contract; The questions are as follows: 1. I have read the attached City of Kent administrative policy number 1.2. 2. During the time of this contract I will not discriminate in employment on the basis of sex, race, color, national origin,age,or the presence of all sensory,mental or physical disability. 3. During the time of this contract the prime contractor will provide a written statement to all new employees and subcontractors indicating commitment as an equal opportunity employer. 4. During the time of the contract I, the prime contractor, will actively consider hiring and promotion of women and minorities. 5. Before acceptance of this contract, an adherence statement will be signed by me, the Prime Contractor, that the Prime Contractor complied with the requirements as set forth above. By signing below,I agree to fulfill the five requirements referenced above. Dated this day of 92008. By: For: Title: Date: CITY OF KENT ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY ' NUMBER: 1.2 EFFECTIVE DATE: January 1, 1998 SUBJECT: MINORITY AND WOMEN SUPERSEDES: April 1, 1996 CONTRACTORS APPROVED BY Jim White,Mayor jPOLICY: Equal employment opportunity requirements for the City of Kent will conform to federal and state laws. All contractors, subcontractors, consultants and suppliers of the City must guarantee equal employment opportunity within their organization and, if holding contracts with the City amounting to $10,000 or more within any given year, must take the following affirmative steps: 1. Provide a written statement to all new employees and subcontractors indicating commitment as an equal opportunity employer. 1 2. Actively consider for promotion and advancement available minorities and women. Any contractor, subcontractor, consultant or supplier who willfully disregards the City's nondiscrimination and equal ' opportunity requirements shall be considered in breach of contract and subject to suspension or termination for all or part of the contract. Contract Compliance Officers will be appointed by the Directors of Planning,Parks, and Public Works Departments to 1 assume the following duties for their respective departments. 1. Ensuring that contractors, subcontractors, consultants, and suppliers subject to these regulations are familiar with the regulations and the City's equal employment opportunity policy. 2. Monitoring to assure adherence to federal,state and local laws,policies and guidelines. CITY OF KENT ' EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMPLIANCE STATEMENT This form shall be filled out AFTER COMPLETION of this project by the Contractor awarded the contract. I,the undersigned,a duly represented agent of Company, ' hereby acknowledge and declare that the before-mentioned company was the prime contract for the contract known as that was entered into on the ' (date) ,between the firm I represent and the City of Kent. I declare that I complied fully with all of the requirements and obligations as outlined in the City of Kent Administrative Policy 1.2 and the Declaration City of Kent Equal Employment Opportunity Policy that was part of the before-mentioned contract. Dated this day of 12004. By: For: ' Title: Date: 1 Kent City Council Meeting Date October 21, 2008 Category Consent Calendar - 6P 1. SUBJECT: KENTUCKY TRAILER TECHNOLOGIES PURCHASING AGREEMENT - AUTHORIZE 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Authorize the Mayor to sign a purchase agreement with Kentucky Trailer Technologies in an amount not to exceed $395,000 to purchase a 36-foot hazardous materials unit trailer. The current hazard materials unit is 18 years-old, has reached the end of its life span and.is undersized for the equipment that is carried to assist in mitigating today's hazardous materials incidents. The replacement of the hazardous materials unit was identified in the Fire Department Apparatus Replacement Fund to be replaced in 2007 and is instead being replaced in 2008. The purchase of the 36' hazardous materials trailer will allow the department to carry the needed equipment to mitigate today's hazardous material incidents. One (1) bid was received for the purchase of the 36' hazardous materials trailer. Negotiations with Kentucky Trailer Technologies on the specifications and purchase contract were completed. The City's Attorney's office has reviewed and approved the purchase contract. 3. EXHIB S IT : Agreement 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Safety Committee 10/14/08 (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? X Revenue? Currently in the Budget? Yes X No 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF KENT AND KENTUCKY TRAILER TECHNOLOGIES FOR THE PURCHASE OF A HAZMAT TRAILER THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by the City of Kent, a Washington municipal corporation, with its principle offices at 220 Fourth Avenue S., Kent, WA 98032-5895, hereinafter "City," and Kentucky Trailer Technologies with its principle place of business at 1240 Pontiac Trail, Walled Lake, MI 48390, hereinafter"Successful Bidder". WITNESSETH: That in consideration of the payments, covenants, and agreements hereinafter ' mentioned, to be made or performed by the parties hereto, the parties covenant and agree to the following: 1. Term—Agreement The term"Agreement" as used herein, shall constitute this document entitled"Agreement between the City of Kent and Successful Bidder for the purchase of a "Hazmat Trailer". Attachment A, entitled "Minimum Specifications for a Hazmat Trailer" and Attachment B, entitled "Drawings" and Attachment C, entitled "Successful Bidder's Proposal" and Attachment D, entitled "Trailer Manufacturer's Build Sheet" and Attachment E, entitled"Clarifications" 2. Term— "Hazmat Trailer" This Agreement is for the purchase of one (1) "Hazmat Trailer" that conforms to the terms of this Agreement. 3. Scope of Work ' Successful Bidder agrees to deliver to the Cit y,ty, one (1) fully functional "Hazmat ' Trailer" that meets the specifications set forth in this Agreement and its various attachments. The City promises and agrees with Successful Bidder to engage Successful Bidder to provide the "Hazmat Trailer" as described in this Agreement and to complete and finish the same according to the plans and specifications set forth in this Agreement and ' Attachment A. The parties agree that the "Hazmat Trailer" will conform with all Federal and local state Department of Transportation rules and regulations in effect at the time of signing of the Agreement. , 4. Delivery and Risk of Loss Successful Bidder agrees to deliver to the City one (1) fully functional "Hazmat Trailer" that conforms to the specifications set forth in this Agreement within 120 calendar days from the date of signing of this Agreement, F.O.B. Kent, WA. The risk of t loss for any defect or damage to the "Hazmat Trailer" shall remain with Successful Bidder until the "Hazmat Trailer" is accepted by the City. ' 5. Payment and Options The total amount to be paid for the "Hazmat Trailer" is $348,354.00, plus any , applicable sales tax. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of acceptance of the "Hazmat Trailer" by the City. Payment shall be made by the City directly to the party designated on the invoice. 6. Preconstruction Successful Bidder shall provide and pay the expenses for travel by air, meals, and accommodations for four (4) representatives of the City to sit down with the ' manufacturer's representatives at their facility to review the specifications, so all parties have a clear understanding of the City's proposal. 7. Inspection The City is entitled to inspect the "Hazmat Trailer" at three (3) different stages. The ' inspections shall include: (I) a mid-construction inspection (appropriate time as agreed upon by City and Successful Bidder); (II) a final construction inspection prior to leaving the factory; and (III) a post-delivery final inspection. With the exception of the post- delivery inspection, the inspections shall occur at the Successful Bidder's manufacturing facility. Successful Bidder shall provide and pay the expenses for travel by air, meals, , and accommodations for four (4) representatives of the City for each of the inspections that occur at the Successful Bidder's manufacturing facility. Successful Bidder shall allow one full day, each way, for travel. The City representatives shall, at a minimum, , be afforded twenty four (24) hours of time to inspect the "Hazmat Trailer" during the mid-construction inspection and the final inspection. The Successful Bidder will have eight (8) hours to cure any deficiencies the City's representatives identify. Additional inspection time shall be afforded for the inspection of any item that is identified by a City's representatives to be defective or doesn't meet specifications. If the Successful Bidder needs more than eight (8) hours to cure the deficiencies, the Successful Bidder shall cover all expenses of the City's representatives for an additional day. If the deficiencies are not corrected within the two (2) days, the Successful Bidder shall fly the City's representative's home. Once the deficiencies are corrected, the Success Bidder shall notify the Kent Fire Department and fly two (2) of its representatives back to the Successful Bidder's manufacturing facility to re-inspect. The Successful Bidder shall cover all travel expenses, meals, and lodging, if there is a re- inspection. Inspection periods shall include only the time that City representatives actually spend at the Successful Bidder's manufacturing facility inspecting the "Hazmat Trailer". All deficiencies shall be corrected prior to the "Hazmat Trailer" leaving the Successful Bidder's manufacturing facility. There shall be a post-delivery final inspection conducted at the City's premises to ensure that the "Hazmat Trailer" conforms to the terms of this Agreement and passes all inspections and tests as required by the City or other laws or regulations. The initial post- delivery inspection and testing shall be completed within thirty (30) days of delivery of the "Hazmat Trailer". In the event the "Hazmat Trailer" fails to meet the tests as required by the City on first trials, second trials may be conducted by the City, at the sole option of the City, within thirty (30) days from the date of the first trials. Such trials shall be final and conclusive. Successful Bidder specifically agrees that its failure to afford the City the opportunity to inspect the "Hazmat Trailer" pursuant to the terms of this Agreement shall be sufficient cause, in and of itself, for the rejection of the "Hazmat Trailer". Notwithstanding any right of inspection, Successful Bidder shall notify the City of any known or discoverable defect in the "Hazmat Trailer" that exists on the date it is discovered. 8. Acceptance Acceptance of the "Hazmat Trailer" shall occur after the "Hazmat Trailer" passes post-delivery inspections and tests. The fact that the City uses the "Hazmat Trailer" for the inspection and tests shall not constitute acceptance. 9. Refection ' The City reserves the right to inspect the "Hazmat Trailer" for any defects, , irregularities, non-conformities, and defects in workmanship and appearance, and to reject a nonconforming or defective "Hazmat Trailer". The City will notify Successful Bidder of the rejection of the "Hazmat Trailer" in writing. The City will also provide Successful Bidder with a written description of the reason(s) for rejection. The City will hold the "Hazmat Trailer" in its possession with reasonable care at Successful Bidder's disposition for a time sufficient to permit Successful Bidder to remove the "Hazmat , Trailer". If Successful Bidder gives no instructions within a reasonable time after notification of the rejection, the City will store the "Hazmat Trailer" at Successful Bidder's expense and such expense shall become a security interest in favor of the City. The parties understand that in the case of rejection, the City is not required to store the "Hazmat Trailer" in an enclosed area. 10. Cure If the City has rejected the "Hazmat Trailer" for a defect or non-conformity, or the "Hazmat Trailer" has or develops a defect after acceptance of the "Hazmat Trailer", Successful Bidder shall have thirty (30) days to cure the defect; provided, Successful Bidder provides the City written notice of Successful Bidder's intent to cure the defect and assures the City that it is capable of curing such defect. The City shall notify the Successful Bidder in writing of its discovery of any defect within thirty (30) days of the ' actual discovery of the defect. The cure of the defect shall be at the sole expense of the Successful Bidder, and Successful Bidder shall cover all costs of such cure. In the event the cure requires that the "Hazmat Trailer" to be transported beyond the limits of the State of Washington, Successful Bidder shall, in addition to covering all costs of such cure, pay to the City $0.50.5 per mile that the "Hazmat Trailer" is driven to cover the wear and tear on the "Hazmat Trailer". Unless otherwise agreed to in a separate writing signed by the parties, Successful Bidder shall have one opportunity to cure each defect for which it has been placed on notice or which Successful Bidder discovers. Any agreement to cure defects of the "Hazmat Trailer" shall not constitute a settlement of claims brought pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. ' If, at any time, Successful Bidder discovers a defect, Successful Bidder shall, within two (2) days of discovery, notify the City of such defects in writing and shall cure such ' defect, if Successful Bidder so chooses,pursuant to this section. 1 11. Warranty 1 Successful Bidder warrants and guarantees that the "Hazmat Trailer" will be manufactured in accordance with the specifications set forth in this Agreement. Successful Bidder further warrants that the "Hazmat Trailer" shall remain free from defect or malfunction for a period of One (, year , PROVIDED, that in the event any warranty that appears in the attachments to this Agreement, or a warranty issued by a component manufacturer, extends beyond One (1) year, in that attachment or issued by the component manufacturer shall prevail and shall not be limited by this paragraph. The implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose, as set forth in sections 62A.2-314 and -315 of the Revised Code of Washington, shall apply to the "Hazmat Trailer". These implied warranties shall apply even though they may be disclaimed in an attachment to this Agreement, such that this section shall prevail over such disclaimer, and such disclaimer shall not apply. The inspection of or failure to inspect the "Hazmat Trailer" shall not constitute a waiver or cancellation of the implied warranties If the "Hazmat Trailer" or any component, unit, or subsystem is repaired, rebuilt, or replaced pursuant to this Agreement, such warranty work, component, unit, or subsystem shall have the remaining unexpired warranty of the original component, unit or subsystem. Successful Bidder shall provide all paperwork relating to warranty coverage of the "Hazmat Trailer" or their components to the City upon delivery of the "Hazmat Trailer". The warranty periods set forth in this Agreement shall not begin to run until the "Hazmat Trailer" is placed in-service by the City. The City will promptly notify Successful Bidder of the date the "Hazmat Trailer" is placed in-service and the mileage of the "Hazmat Trailer" when it is placed in-service. The warranty period set forth in this Agreement shall not run during any period in which the "Hazmat Trailer" is not functional due to a defect in the "Hazmat Trailer" so long as the City places Successful ' Bidder on written notice of the defect. In the event a component manufacturer requires that the purchaser register its purchase ' with the manufacturer to make effective a component manufacturer's warranty, Successful Bidder shall take all steps necessary to register such purchase with the 1 component manufacturer. In the event Successful Bidder fails to properly register the City's purchase with the component manufacturer, then Successful Bidder shall assume the status of warrantor of such component as if such registration had occurred. 1 1 1 12. Performance Bond Successful Bidder shall provide and execute a performance bond for the full contract amount. This performance bond shall: (1) Be signed by an approved surety (or sureties) that: a. Is registered with the Washington State Insurance Commissioner, and b. Appears on the current authorized Insurance List for the State of Washington published by the Office of the Washington Insurance Commissioner. (2) Be conditioned on the faithful performance of the contract by Successful Bidder within the prescribed time. (3) Guarantee that the surety shall indemnify, defend, and protect the City against any claim of direct or indirect loss resulting from the failure: a. Of Successful Bidder(or any of the employees, sub-contractors, volunteer sub-contractors of Successful Bidder) to faithfully perform the contract, and b. Of Successful Bidder (or the sub-contractors) to pay all laborers, mechanics, subcontractors, volunteers, material person, or any other person who provides supplies or provisions for carrying out the work. (4) The City may require the surety companies on the Performance Bond to appear and qualify themselves. When the City deems the surety or sureties to be inadequate, it may, upon written demand, require Successful Bidder to furnish additional surety to cover any remaining work. Until the added surety is furnished,payments on the contract will stop. ' (5) The parties agree that no liability shall attach to the City by reason of entering into this Agreement except as expressly provided herein. ' r r13. Independent Contractor The parties intend that an independent contractor-employer relationship will be created by this Agreement. As Successful Bidder is customarily engaged in an independently established trade that encompasses the specific service provided to the City, no agent, employee, representative, or sub-contractor of Successful Bidder shall be or shall be deemed to be the employee, agent, representative, or sub-contractor of the City. In the performance of the work, Successful Bidder is an independent contractor with the ability to control and direct the performance and details of the work, the City being interested only in the results obtained under this Agreement. None of the benefits provided by the City to its employees, including, but not limited to, compensation, insurance, and unemployment insurance are available from the City to the employees, agents, representatives, or sub-contractors of Successful Bidder. Successful Bidder will be solely and entirely responsible for its acts and for the acts of Successful Bidder 's agents, employees, representatives, and sub-contractors during the performance of this Agreement. The City may, during the term of this Agreement, engage other independent contractors to perform similar work. 14. Non-Assignment Successful Bidder shall not assign this Agreement nor any part thereof, nor any monies due or to become due thereunder, without the prior written approval of the City. LSuccessful Bidder shall not sublet any part of this Agreement without first having obtained the written consent of the City to do so. IN CASE SUCH CONSENT TO ' SUBLET ANY PART OF THIS AGREEMENT IS GIVEN BY THE CITY, IT SHALL IN NO WAY RELEASE SUCCESSFUL BIDDER FROM ANY RESPONSIBILITY UNDER THIS AGREEMENT, AND SUCCESSFUL BIDDER SHALL BE HELD IN ' ALL RESPECTS ACCOUNTABLE AS IF NO CONSENT HAS BEEN GIVEN. SUCCESSFUL BIDDER WILL BE REQUIRED TO GIVE PERSONAL ATTENTION TO THE WORK THAT IS SUBLET. 1 1 r r 1 1 r 15. Indemnification r Successful Bidder shall defend, indemnify, and hold the City, it's officers, officials, ' employees, agents and volunteers harmless from injury and all claims, injuries, damages, losses, and suits including all legal costs and attorney fees arising out of or in connection with the performance of this Agreement except for injuries and damages resulting from the sole negligence of the City. The City's inspection or acceptance of the "Hazmat Trailer" when completed will not be grounds to avoid any of these covenants of indemnification. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. The City shall: (1) promptly notify Successful Bidder of any claim for which indemnification may be sought; (2) cooperate fully in the defense of such claim; and(3) permit Successful Bidder to settle or compromise such claim on terms and conditions which, in good faith, it determines are appropriate. 16. Insurance , Successful Bidder shall procure and maintain for the duration of this Agreement, insurance of the types and in the amounts described below against claims for injury to persons or damage to property that may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by Successful Bidder, its agents, representatives, employees, sub- , consultants, or sub-contractors. Before beginning work on the project described in this Agreement, Successful Bidder shall provide a Certificate of Insurance evidencing: Commercial general liability insurance written on an occurrence basis with limits g tY no less than $1,000,000.00 combined single limit per occurrence and $2,000,000.00 aggregate for personal injury, bodily injury, and property damage. Coverage shall include but not be limited to: Blanket contractual; products/completed operations/broad form property damage; explosion; and employer's liability. THE INSURANCE MUST REFER TO THE PROJECT NAME, PROJECT LOCATION AND CONTAIN A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT. ANY PAYMENT OF DEDUCTIBLE OF SELF-INSURED RETENTION SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF SUCCESSFUL BIDDER. The City, its officers, officials, agents, and volunteers shall be named as an , additional insured on the insurance policy, as respects work performed by or on behalf of Successful Bidder and a copy of the endorsement naming the City as an additional insured shall be attached to the Certificate of Insurance. 1 1 r Successful Bidder's insurance shall contain a clause stating that coverage shall apply separately to each insured against whom a claim is made or suit is brought, except with respects to the limits of the insured's liability. Successful Bidder's insurance shall be primary insurance as respects the City, and the City shall be given thirty calendar day's prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, of any cancellation, suspension, or material change in coverage. The City also reserves it's unqualified right to require, at any time for any reason, proof of coverage in the form of a duplicate of the insurance policy with all endorsements of the insurance coverage. 17. Discrimination In the hiring of employees for the performance of work under this Agreement or any sub- contract hereunder, Successful Bidder, its sub-contractors, or any person acting on behalf of Successful Bidder or its sub-contractor shall not, by reason of race, religion, color, sex, national origin, or the presence of any sensory, mental, or physical disability, discriminate against any person who is qualified and available to perform the work to which the employment relates. Successful Bidder shall execute the attached City of Kent Equal Employment Opportunity Policy Declaration, Comply with City Administrative Policy 1.2, and upon completion of the contract work, file the attached Compliance Statement. 1 18. Severabilitv If any term, provision, condition, or other portion of this Agreement, or it's application to any person is held to be inoperative, invalid, or void, than the same shall not affect any other term,provision, condition, or any other portion of this Agreement or it's application to any person. ' 19. Cumulation of Remedies All remedies available to either party for breach of this Agreement are cumulative and ' may be exercised concurrently or separately, and the exercise of any one remedy shall not be deemed an election of such remedy to the exclusion of other remedies. t 20. Non-Waiver of Breach ■ No term or provision hereof shall be deemed waived and no breach consented to unless ' such waiver or consent shall be in writing and signed by the party claimed to have waived or consented. Any consent by any party, or waiver of, the breach of the other whether expressed or implied shall not constitute a continuing waiver of or consent to, nor excuse a different or subsequent breach. The failure of the City to enforce one portion of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver, or excuse the breach, of another portion of this Agreement. 21. Authority Each party has full power and authority to enter into and perform this Agreement, and the person signing this Agreement on behalf of each party has been properly authorized and empowered to enter into this Agreement. Each party further acknowledges that it has read this Agreement and understands and agrees to be bound by its terms. 22. Choice of Law This Agreement shall be exclusively governed and controlled by the laws of the City of , Kent and the State of Washington, including, but not limited to, the State's Uniform Commercial Code as contained in Chapter 62A.2 RCW. To the extent that this Agreement conflicts with the provisions of Chapter 62A.2 RCW, the terms of this Agreement shall control. Jurisdiction and venue for any action relating to this Agreement shall exclusively be in the Superior Court for King County, Washington. 23. Termination ' This Agreement may be terminated in whole or in part: (a) By the City if Successful Bidder fails to deliver a conforming "Hazmat Trailer" within thirty (30) days after the time for delivery specified in this Agreement or after thirty (30) days for a cure of any defect or non-conformity. The City shall notify Successful Bidder of the termination, the reasons thereof, and the effective date. (b) By the mutual written agreement of the City and Successful Bidder. The Agreement to terminate shall include the conditions of termination, the effective date, and in the case of termination in part, the portion to be terminated. After the effective date of termination, no charges incurred under this Agreement, or g g terminated portions thereof, are allowable. 24. Liquidated Damap-es Liquidated damages at a rate of $100.00 per calendar day shall be assessed against Successful Bidder for the late performance of any condition or term set forth in this Agreement. Successful Bidder's delay in the performance of any term of this Agreement shall be excused if the cause of such delay is beyond the control of, and without the fault or negligence of, Successful Bidder, including weather, inability to obtain materials, strikes, acts of god, acts of the public enemy, acts of a government entity, fires, floods, and earthquakes. 25. Notice to Proceed Successful Bidder shall commence all work immediately upon execution of the Agreement and shall provide a performance bond, a copy of an insurance policy(ies)\certificate(s), a copy of the Equal Employment Opportunity Policy Declaration, and an additional insured endorsement. 26. Sales Tax The City shall be responsible for paying Washington State Sales Tax on the contract amount at a rate that is current when and where the unit is purchased. Sales tax collected by Successful Bidder will be subject to WAC 458-20-145, Special Rule No. 1. 27. Ownership and Title Upon acceptance of the "Hazmat Trailer" and payment by the City pursuant to this Agreement, ownership and title of the "Hazmat Trailer" shall pass to the City. 28. Modification This Agreement may only be amended or modified by the mutual written agreement of the parties. All amendments or modifications shall be signed by both parties and be attached to this Agreement. t29. Standard of Performance ' All work to be performed by Successful Bidder shall be performed in a workman-like manner in accordance with generally accepted professional practices in effect at the time such work is performed. 30. Notices Any notices to be delivered shall be directed to the attention of the following: CITY: City of Kent Fire Department: Attention: Jim Schneider, Pat Pawlak, Tom Arnson, Fire Chief Division Chief Mechanic Supervisor , City of Kent 220 Fourth Avenue South Kent, WA 98032 31. Entire Agreement This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the City and Successful Bidder. With the exception of properly executed modifications, representations, either written or oral, that are not contained in this Agreement, shall not be considered part of this Agreement. 32. Conflict of Terms The terms of this Agreement, including the Attachments shall be read together. Unless g g g otherwise specified in this Agreement, in the event that any of the terms of the Agreement including the Attachments conflict with each other, the following shall be the order of precedence: The terms of this Document entitled "Agreement Between City of Kent and the Successful Bidder for the purchase of"Hazmat Trailer" shall take precedence over the terms of any other portion of this Agreement. • Attachment A entitled "Minimum Specifications for a Hazmat Trailer" shall take precedence over Attachments B, C, D, and E. • Attachment B entitled "Drawings" shall take precedence over Attachments C, D, and E. Attachment C entitled "Successful Bidder Proposal" shall take precedence over Attachments D and E. • Attachment D entitled "Trailer Manufacturer's Build Sheets" shall take precedence over Attachment E, entitled"Clarifications". IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year written below. If the dates written below do not coincide, the latest written date shall act as the effective date of this Agreement. SUCCESSFUL BIDDER CITY OF KENT By: By: Print Name: Suzette Cooke Title: Sales Representative Mayor Date: Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Arthur M. Fitzpatrick Deputy City Attorney Date: ' ATTEST: By. Brenda Jacober, City Clerk Date: DECLARATION CITY OF KENT EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY POLICY The City of Kent is committed to conform to Federal and State laws regarding equal opportunity. As such all contractors, subcontractors and suppliers who perform work with relation to this contract shall comply with the regulations of the City's equal employment opportunity policies. The following questions specifically identify the requirements the City deems necessary for any contractor, subcontractor or supplier on this specific contract to adhere to. An affirmative response is required on all of the following questions for this contract to be valid and binding. If any contractor, subcontractor or supplier willfully misrepresents themselves with regard to the directives outlines, it will be considered a breach of contract and it will be at the City's sole determination regarding suspension or termination for all or part of the contract; The questions are as follows: 1. I have read the attached City of Kent administrative policy number 1.2. 2. During the time of this contract I will not discriminate in employment on the basis of sex, race, color,national origin,age,or the presence of all sensory,mental or physical disability. 3. During the time of this contract the prime contractor will provide a written statement to all new employees and subcontractors indicating commitment as an equal opportunity employer. 4. During the time of the contract I, the prime contractor, will actively consider hiring and promotion of women , and minorities. 5. Before acceptance of this contract, an adherence statement will be signed by me, the Prime Contractor, that the , Prime Contractor complied with the requirements as set forth above. By signing below,I agree to fulfill the five requirements referenced above. Dated this day of 52006. By: For: Title: Date: CITY OF KENT ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY NUMBER: 1.2 EFFECTIVE DATE: January 1, 1998 SUBJECT: MINORITY AND WOMEN SUPERSEDES: April 1, 1996 CONTRACTORS APPROVED BY Jim White,Mayor POLICY: Equal employment opportunity requirements for the City of Kent will conform to federal and state laws. All contractors, subcontractors, consultants and suppliers of the City must guarantee equal employment opportunity within their organization and, if holding contracts with the City amounting to $10,000 or more within any given year,must take the following affirmative steps: 1. Provide a written statement to all new employees and subcontractors indicating commitment as an equal opportunity employer. 2. Actively consider for promotion and advancement available minorities and women. Any contractor, subcontractor, consultant or supplier who willfully disregards the City's nondiscrimination and equal opportunity requirements shall be considered in breach of contract and subject to suspension or termination for all or part of the contract. Contract Compliance Officers will be appointed by the Directors of Planning,Parks,and Public Works Departments to assume the following duties for their respective departments. 1. Ensuring that contractors, subcontractors, consultants, and suppliers subject to these regulations are familiar with the regulations and the City's equal employment opportunity policy. 2. Monitoring to assure adherence to federal,state and local laws,policies and guidelines. CITY OF KENT , EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMPLIANCE STATEMENT This form shall be filled out AFTER COMPLETION of this project by the Contractor awarded the contract. 1,the undersigned,a duly represented agent of Company, hereby acknowledge and declare that the before-mentioned company was the prime contract for the contract known as that was entered into on the (date) ,between the firm I represent and the City of Kent. I declare that I complied fully with all of the requirements and obligations as outlined in the City of Kent Administrative Policy 1.2 and the Declaration City of Kent Equal Employment Opportunity Policy that was part of the before-mentioned contract. Dated this day of ,2004. By: For: Title: Date: Kent City Council Meeting Date October 21, 2008 Category Consent Calendar - 6Q 1. SUBJECT: DRUG FREE COMMUNITIES SUPPORT GRANT AWARD - ACCEPT 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Accept the grant funds in the amount of $80,150 from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Substance Abuse Mental Health Services' (SAMHSA) Drug Free Communities Support Program to support Kent's Drug Free Communities Coalition, amend the budget as required, and authorize the Mayor to sign all necessary grant documents. The length of the project period is up to five years. 3. EXHIBITS: SAMHSA award letter and Kent Drug Free Communities Coalition abstract 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Safety Committee 10/14/08 (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? Y Revenue? Y Currently in the Budget? Yes No X 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: i 1 Notice of Award a " Drug Free Communities Support Program Issue Date: 09/15/2008 j Department of Health and Human Services Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Center for Substance Abuse Prevention Grant Number: 1 H79SP014902-01 Program Director: Stacy Judd Project Title: Kent Drug Free Coalition Grantee Address Business Address KENT CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT Debra LeRoy Kent Police Department R&D Analyst 220 4th Avenue Street Kent Police Department Kent,WA 98032 220 4th Avenue S Kent,WA 98032 Budget Period: 09/30/2008—09/29/2009 Project Period: 09/30/2008—09/29/2013 Dear Grantee: The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration hereby awards a grant in the amount of $80,150(see"Award Calculation" in Section I and"Terms and Conditions"in Section III)to KENT CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT in support of the above referenced project. This award is pursuant to the authority of the DFC Act 1997(PL105-20)reauth. PL 107-82, 115 STAT 814 and is subject to the requirements of this statute and regulation and of other referenced,incorporated or attached terms and conditions. Award recipients may access the SAMHSA website at www.samhsa.gov(click on"Grants"then SAMHSA Grants Management),which provides information relating to the Division of Payment Management System, HHS Division of Cost Allocation and Postaward Administration Requirements. Please use your grant number for reference. Acceptance of this award including the"Terms and Conditions"is acknowledged by the grantee when funds are drawn down or otherwise obtained from the grant payment system. If you have any questions about this award, please contact your Grants Management Specialist and your Government Project Officer listed in your terms and conditions. Sincerely yours, Kathleen Sample Grants Management Officer Division of Grants Management, OPS Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration See additional information below Page-1 SECTION I—AWARD DATA—1 H79SP014902-01 Award Calculation(U.S. Dollars) Salaries and Wages $1,725 Fringe Benefits $150 Personnel Costs(Subtotal) $1,875 Supplies $17,095 Travel Costs $10,765 Other Costs $14,435 Consortium/Contractual Cost $35,980 Direct Cost $80,150 Approved Budget $160,300 Federal Share $80,150 Non-Federal Share $80,150 Cumulative Prior Awards for this Budget Period $0 AMOUNT OF THIS ACTION(FEDERAL SHARE) $80,150 SUMMARY TOTALS FOR ALL YEARS YR AMOUNT 1 $80,150 2 $5454,372372 3 $63,463 4 $53,492 5 $53,639 Recommended future year total cost support,subject to the availability of funds and satisfactory progress of the project. Fiscal Information: CFDA Number: 93.276 EIN: 1916001265A1 Document Number: H9SP14902A Fiscal Year: 2008 IC CAN Amount SP C96R655 $80,150 SP Administrative Data: PCC: DFC/OC:4146 SECTION II—PAYMENT/HOTLINE INFORMATION—1 H79SP014902-01 Payments under this award will be made available through the HHS Payment Management System(PMS). PMS is a centralized grants payment and cash management system,operated by the HHS Program Support Center(PSC), Division of Payment Management(DPM). Inquiries regarding payment should be directed to:The Division of Payment Management System, PO Box 6021, Rockville, MD 20852,Help Desk Support—Telephone Number: 1-877-614-5533. The HHS Inspector General maintains a toll-free hotline for receiving information concerning fraud,waste, or abuse under grants and cooperative agreements. The telephone number is: 1-800-HHS-TIPS (1-800- 447-8477). The mailing address is: Office of Inspector General, Department of Health and Human Services,Attn: HOTLINE, 330 Independence Ave., SW,Washington, DC 20201. SECTION III—TERMS AND CONDITIONS—1H79SP014902-01 Page-2 e This award is based on the application submitted to, and as approved by, SAMHSA on the above-title project and is subject to the terms and conditions incorporated either directly or by reference in the following: a. The grant program legislation and program regulation cited in this Notice of Award. b. The restrictions on the expenditure of federal funds in appropriations acts to the extent those restrictions are pertinent to the award. c. 45 CFR Part 74 or 45 CFR Part 92 as applicable. d. The HHS Grants Policy Statement. e. This award notice, INCLUDING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CITED BELOW. Treatment of Program Income: Additional Costs SECTION IV— SP Special Terms and Condition—1 H79SP014902-01 SPECIAL TERM OF AWARD: The Division of Grants Management, SAMHSA is currently conducting a review of your organization's financial management system. If the review discloses material weaknesses or other financial management concerns,grant funding may be restricted in accordance with 45 CFR 74.14 or 92.12,as applicable.The restriction will affect the draw-down of funds from the Payment Management System;all draw-downs will require the prior approval of the applicable Grants Management Specialist. REMARKS: The Drug Free Communities Program's Progressive Grant Program Discipline and Appeals processes have been developed by the Executive Office of the President, Office of National Drug Control Policy(ONDCP) and Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration(SAMHSA). There are three progressive discipline actions that can be taken: 1) High Risk status,2)Suspension 3)Termination. An overview of this plan is included as Attachment 1 to this package,and the complete explanation and procedures are posted on the Drug Free Communities Program website,www.ondcp.gov/dfc or can be linked through www.samhsa.gov. FY 2008-Drug Free Communities Support Program(NEW) The Drug-Free Communities Support Program(DFC)is a collaborative effort between the Executive Office of the President, Office of National Drug Control Policy(ONDCP), and the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration(SAMHSA). ONDCP issues grant awards to community coalitions through an interagency agreement with SAMHSA.The purpose of the funding is to address two major goals: 1) Establish and strengthen collaboration among communities,private nonprofit agencies,and Federal, State, and local and tribal governments to support the efforts of community coalitions to prevent and reduce substance abuse among youth;and 2)Reduce substance abuse among youth and,overtime,among adults by addressing the factors in a community that increase the risk of substance abuse and promoting the factors that minimize the risk of substance abuse.While responsibility rests with the grantee for achieving the primary goals of the program, SAMHSA and its designated representatives shall monitor and provide continuing technical assistance,consultation,and coordination in the conduct of the project during the funding period. In addition to these terms and conditions and the applicable statutes and regulations, grantees are bound by the HHS Grants Policy Statement which can be accessed through www.samhsa.gov(grants/manaaement.asox and all requirements in the FY 2008 DFC Request for Applications are available at www.samhsa.goy4rants/archi es.asnx. A. ROLE OF THE GRANTEE: The grantee adheres to the programmatic and fiscal requirements described in the FY 2008 DFC Program Announcement as well as to the specific goals and objectives indicated in the approved application.The grantee is or represents a coalition that is comprised of representatives from at least 12 community sectors (as listed in the FY 2008 Program Announcement). Grantee/coalition must have reduction of substance abuse among youth as a principal mission.The grantee functions as a unique entity and its meeting minutes must demonstrate that it has substantial involvement and participation from its membership.A Page-3 funding plan must be in place or be developed to ensure a dollar for dollar match of federal funds and to solicit substantial financial support from non-federal sources to ensure that it will be self-sustaining when federal assistance is no longer available.The grantee receives and expends non-federal matching funds. The grantee collects and reports data profiling youth within the areas it serves as described in the FY 2008 Program Announcement. Participation in a national evaluation of the DFC program is required. IF A COALITION USES A FISCAL AGENT, THAT AGENT THEN BECOMES THE PRIMARY APPLICANT/GRANTEE FOR THE GRANT. B. ROLE OF THE GOVERNMENT PROJECT OFFICER(GPO): • GPOs should have an initial contact with each grantee shortly after the grantee receives the Notice of Award from SAMHSA.This discussion,at a minimum, should include clarification of program goals and objectives; review of Government Performance and Results Act targets;a review of staff; a determination of whether there are immediate needs for training or technical assistance;review of the budget;terms and conditions or other issues.Finally,this conversation should provide the grantee the details necessary to plan for and attend the mandatory DFC New Grantee Training held during the first quarter of the grant year. • GPOs have regular and ongoing contact with grantees,at the minimum,on a monthly basis, through e-mail, phone calls and site visits. • Receive,review and provide appropriate feedback on the semi-annual programmatic progress reports. • GPOs are responsible for ongoing project monitoring and coordinating with SAMHSA Division of Grants Management(DGM-which conducts the fiscal oversight of the grantee),where appropriate.Program aspects of monitoring are accomplished by collecting and continuously reviewing information from telephone communications, site visits, progress reports, correspondence,COMET submissions,technical assistance reports,grantee meetings, and other sources.Monitoring also includes taking corrective action, as needed.The AAGAM states that "each monitoring action must result in written documentation that the monitoring has taken place,if any exceptions have been identified,and the type of follow-up action recommended(Chapter 3.06.106)." • GPOs review semi-annual progress reports and provide feedback to the grantee on whether performance is satisfactory. C. ROLE OF THE GRANTS MANAGEMENT OFFICER(GMO)and SAMHSA's DIVISION OF GRANTS MANAGEMENT(DGM): The Grants Management Officer(GMO)is responsible for all of the business management aspects of grant negotiation,award,financial and administrative aspects of the grant program.The GMO will utilize information from site visits,reviews of expenditure and audit reports,and other appropriate means to assure that the project is operated in compliance with all applicable Federal laws, regulations,guidelines, grant eligibility requirements and terms and conditions of award.Questions concerning the applicability of regulations and policies of this grant program,and all required prior approvals such as,requests for permission to expend funds for certain items should be directed to the GMO.The GMO is the only person who may grant such required approvals.All changes in the terms of the grant award must be in writing by the GMO. • GMO conducts post award grant administration activities including: budget revisions;carryovers; change in grantee; change in scope or nature of the annual plan;change of key personnel. • GMO reviews and validates the Financial Status Reports at the end of each budget year assuring that grantees comply with the match requirements. • GMO provides technical assistance on various grants management issues to grantees and the Government Project Officer(GPO). • GMO, in concert with GPO, conducts site visits to review grantees'financial compliance. • GMO, along with the GPO, reviews and then processes no-cost extension requests. Page-4 D.SPECIAL TERMS OF AWARD: Failure to comply with special terms and conditions may result in a drawdown restriction on your Payment Management Account or denial of funding in the future.The Special Terms and Conditions of this award are as follows: 1. Grantee must receive and expend non-federal matching funds as required in the Program Announcement. In-kind support may also be used to satisfy the match requirement. 2. Grantee must report, on a biennial basis(at least every two years),the following data on youth consistent with the geographic area served by the coalition:(1)age of onset of any drug(including alcohol, marijuana and tobacco); (2)frequency of drug use in the past 30 days(including alcohol, marijuana and tobacco); (3)perception of risk or harm; and(4)perception of disapproval of use by adults(including alcohol,marijuana and tobacco),or other measures as identified by ONDCP.The grantee should report on youth in at least three grades.The size of the data collection must be sufficient to provide an accurate and meaningful statistical representation of the geographic area served by the coalition.The grantee is responsible for providing that data on or before the deadline established for each reporting period as highlighted in Section F of this document and on the program website at www.ondcp.gov/dfc. Failure to meet established deadlines could result in the GPO placing the grantee on High Risk status which could lead to an eventual suspension or termination of the grant for failure to comply with reporting requirements. 3. By Oct. 31,2008 grantee is required to submit a plan outlining how the coalition will comply with the data reporting requirements listed in section D-2.The report should be submitted to the Government Project Officer listed in the contact section of this award notice. 4. Grantee must participate in the national DFC evaluation.This includes the reporting of required data, and potential further interaction with the evaluation team, as necessary. 5. If required,grantee must develop a corrective action plan and complete approved plan within a designated timeframe to correct or improve identified deficiencies in performance and/or in the conditions contributing or causing the unsatisfactory performance. 6. Grantee must appropriate funds to send two(2)people to a four-day FY 2008 New Grantee Training Workshop to be held in Washington, DC during the first quarter of the grant year.ONDCP will provide guidelines on the positions and/or participants who should attend. 7. New grantees(Year One)must also budget for two individuals to attend two additional training for a total of seven additional training days(in addition to the New Grantee Training)throughout the first year of the grant. For budgeting purposes only, assume that second training will take place in Denver, CO and the third in Washington,DC.Actual training dates and locations will be announced later in the year through your GPO and the information will be posted on the program website at www.ondcp,aov/dfc. 8. DFC coalitions must use the Strategic Prevention Framework(SPF),a five step evidence-based process for community planning and decision-making.The 5-step process includes:needs assessment, capacity building,planning,implementation,and evaluation. 9. Grantees in the 3rd and 7th year of DFC funding must submit and have a sustainability plan approved by their GPO.Within 60 days of the start of the 3rd and 7th year,grantees must submit this plan electronically to the GPO. E. STANDARD TERMS OF AWARD: 1. This grant is subject to the terms and conditions,included directly,or incorporated by reference on the Notice of Award(NoA).Refer to the order of precedence in Section III(Terms and Conditions) on the NoA. 2. The grantee organization is legally and financially responsible for all aspects of this grant, including funds provided to sub-recipients. 3. Grant funds cannot be used to supplant current funding of existing activities.Under the HHS Grants Policy Directives, 1.02 General--Definition:Supplant is to replace funding of a recipient's existing program with funds from a Federal grant. 1 Page-5 4. The recommended future support as indicated on the NoA reflects TOTAL costs(direct plus indirect). Funding is subject to the availability of Federal funds,the demonstration of matching funds,and acceptable documentation of the progress of the grant. 5. Accounting Records and Disclosure-Awardees and sub-recipients must maintain records which adequately identify the source and application of funds provided for financially assisted activities. These records must contain information pertaining to grant or subgrant awards,matching funds and in-kind support,and authorizations,obligations,unobligated balances,assets, liabilities, outlays or expenditures, and income.The awardee,and all its sub-recipients,should expect that SAMHSA,or its designee,may conduct a financial compliance audit and on-site program review of grants with significant amounts of Federal funding. 6. Per(45 CFR 92.34)and the HHS Grants Policy Statement, any copyrighted or copyrightable works developed under this cooperative agreement/grant shall be subject to a royalty-free, nonexclusive and irrevocable license to the government to reproduce,publish, or otherwise use them and to authorize others to do so for Federal Government purposes. Income earned from any copyrightable work developed under this grant must be used a program income. 7. A notice in response to the President's Welfare-to-Work Initiative was published in the Federal Register on May 16, 1997.This initiative is designed to facilitate and encourage grantees and their sub-recipients to hire welfare recipients and to provide additional needed training and/or mentoring as needed.The text of the notice is available electronically on the OMB home page at www.whitehouse.gov/omb/fedreg/omb-not.html. 8. Program income accrued under the award must be accounted for in accordance with (45 CFR 74.24)or(45 CFR 92.25)as applicable. Program income must be reported on the Financial Status Report, Standard Form 269(long form). Program income accrued under this award may be used in accordance with the additional costs alternative described in(45 CFR 74.24(b)(1))or(45 CFR 92.25(g)(2))as applicable. Program income must be used to further the grant objectives and shall only be used for allowable costs as set forth in the applicable OMB Circulars A-102("Grants and Cooperative Agreements with State and Local Governments")and A-110("Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Agreements With Institutions of Higher Education,Hospitals, and Other Non-Profit Organizations"). 9. All actions that require prior approval must be submitted in writing to the GMO, SAMHSA.The mailed/faxed/e-mailed request must bear the signature of an authorized business official of the grantee organization as well as the project director. E-mail requests are acceptable.When submitting e-mail requests, please include grant number, Project Director,the authorized institutional official's name, title and institution,telephone number, fax number and e-mail address. It is understood that the transmission of electronic prior approval requests is a clear expression of institutional approval and that all internal procedures have been properly completed.Additionally, the grantee will be responsible for any internal distribution of the request.Approval of the request may be granted by the GMO and will be in writing within 30 days. No other written or oral approval should be accepted and will not be binding on SAMHSA. For prior approval procedures access www.samhsa.aoylgrants/managementasnx. 10. Any replacement of, or substantial reduction in effort of the Program Director(PD)or other key staff of the grantee or any of the sub-recipients requires the written prior approval of the GMO within 30 days.The GMO must approve the selection of the PD or other key personnel, if the individual being nominated for the position had not been named in the approved application,or if a replacement is needed should the incumbent step down or be unable to execute the position's responsibilities.A resume for the individual(s)being nominated must be included with the request by letter or e-mail. Key staff(or key staff positions,if staff has not been selected)are listed below: Stacy Judd,Public Education Specialist @ 20%level of effort Sara Wood,Public Education Specialist @ 20%level of effort 11. Submit by letter or e-mail any changes in the grantee scope of work such as goals, objectives, data collection,and evaluation require the written prior approval of the GMO and GPO within 30 days. 12. None of the Federal funds provided under this award shall be used to carry out any program for distributing sterile needles or syringes for the hypodermic injection of any illegal drug. Page-6 13. Refer to the NoA under Section II (Payment/Hotline Information)regarding the Payment Management System and the HHS Inspector General's Hotline concerning fraud,waste or abuse. 14. As the grantee organization,you acknowledge acceptance of the grant terms and conditions by drawing or otherwise obtaining funds from the Payment Management System. In doing so,your organization must ensure that you exercise prudent stewardship over Federal funds and that all costs are allowable,allocable and reasonable. 15. No HHS funds may be paid as profit(fees)per(45 CFR Parts 74.81 and 92.22(2)). 16. RESTRICTIONS ON GRANTEE LOBBYING(Appropriations Act Section 503). (a) No part of any appropriation contained in the Drug Free Communities Act of 1997(this Act) shall be used,other than for normal and recognized executive-legislative relationships,for publicity or propaganda purposes,for the preparation,distribution,or use of any kit, pamphlet, booklet, publication,radio,television,or video presentation designed to support or defeat legislation pending before the Congress,except in presentation to the Congress itself or any State legislature. (b)No part of any appropriation contained in this Act shall be used to pay the salary or expenses of any grant or contract recipient,or agent acting for such recipient, related to any activity designed to influence legislation or appropriations pending before the Congress or any State legislature. 17. Where a conference is funded by a grant or cooperative agreement the recipient must include the following statement on all conference materials(including promotional materials,agenda,and Internet sites): Funding for this conference was made possible(in part) by(insert grant or cooperative agreement award number)from ONDCP and SAMHSA.The views expressed in written conference materials or publications and by speakers and moderators do not necessarily reflect the official policies of the Office of National Drug Control Policy or the Department of Health and Human Services:nor does mention of trade names, commercial practices,or organizations imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. 18. This award is subject to the requirements of Section 106(g)of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000,as amended(22 U.S.C.7104). For the full text of the Act,go to www.samhsa.gov/grants/trafficking.asnx. 19. Grantees must comply with the requirements of the National Historical Preservation Act and EO 13287,Preserve America.The HHS Grants Policy Statement provides clarification and uniform guidance regarding preservation issues and requirements(pages 1-20,"Preservation of Cultural and Historical Resources").Questions concerning historical preservation,please contact, Mike Daniels, SAMHSA Federal Preservation Coordinator, SAMHSA at Mike.Daniels@samhsa.hhs.gov or 240-276-0759. F.REPORTING REQUIREMENTS: 1. Financial Status Report(FSR), Standard Form 269(long form)is required on an annual basis and must be submitted for each budget period no later than 90 days after the close of the budget period.The FSR 269 is required for each 12 month period,regardless of the overall length of the approved extension period authorized by SAMHSA. In addition,a final FSR 269 is due within 90 days after the end of the extension. If applicable,include the required match on this form under Transactions(#10 a-d), Recipient's share of net outlays(#10 a-i)and Program Income(q-t)in order for SAMHSA to determine whether matching is being provided and the rate of expenditure is appropriate.Adjustments to the award amount, if necessary,will be made if the grantee fails to meet the match.The FSR must be prepared on a cumulative basis and all program income must be reported.Disbursements reported on the FSR must equal/or agree with the Final Payment Management System Report(PSC-272).The FSR may be accessed from the following website at www.pse.goy/forms/s`f/SF-269.pd pd and the data can be entered directly on the form and the system will calculate the figures and then print and mail to this office. 2. DFC Semi-Annual Progress Reports are due to be submitted through the Coalition Online Management and Evaluation Tool(COMET)on the following dates unless otherwise instructed by ONDCP through your GPO: May 11,2009 AND November 10,2009 Page-7 3. Grantee is required to submit an annual classification tool survey through the COMET system. Submission of the survey is required by the following date unless otherwise instructed by ONDCP through your GPO: November 10,2008 4. Submission of the Federal Cash Transactions Report PSC 272 is due 45 days after the end of each fiscal quarter.This Division of Payment Management report is completed on-line.To access the information and review the exact due dates go to wwwApm.pac mw 5. The grantee must comply with the GPRA requirements that include the collection and periodic reporting of performance data as specified in the RFA or by the Project Officer.This information is needed In order to comply with PL 102-62 which requires that SAMHSA report evaluation data to ensure the effectiveness and efficiency of its programs. 6. Submission of audit reports in accordance with the procedures established in OMB Circular A-133 is required by the Single Audit Act Amendments of 1966(P,L. 104-156).An audit is required for all entities which expend$500,000 or more of Federal funds in each fiscal year and is due to the Clearinghouse within 30 days of receipt from the auditor or within nine(9)months of the fiscal year, whichever occurs first, to the following address: Federal Audit Clearinghouse Bureau of the Census 1201 E. 10th Street Jeffersonville, IN 47132 Failure to comply with the above stated terms and conditions may result in classification as High Risk status,suspension,termination of this award or denial of funding in the future. G.INDIRECT COSTS: If grantees want to claim indirect costs, they must have an indirect cost rate agreement;otherwise,all costs should be charged as a direct cost. Grantees that have not established an indirect cost rate agreement are required to submit an Indirect cost rate proposal to the appropriate office within 90 days from the start date of the project period. If the grantee requests indirect cost reimbursement but does not have an approved rate agreement at the time of award,the grantee shall be limited to a provisional rate equaling one-half of the indirect costs requested up to a maximum of 10 percent of salaries and wages only whichever is less. If the recipient falls to provide a timely proposal, indirect costs paid in anticipation of establishment of a rate must be disallowed. SAMHSA will not accept a research indirect cost rate.The grantee must use other-sponsored program rate or lowest rate available. Please contact the appropriate office of the Division of Cost Allocation to begin the process for establishing an indirect cost rate,To find a list of HHS Division of Cost Allocation Regional Offices go to www.samhsa.goylgrants/contact.aspx. H. ENVIRONMENTAL STRATEGIES: Environmental strategies are strategies aimed at the environment and based on the community systems perspective that views a community as a set of persons engaged in shared social, cultural, political, and economic processes.Environmentally based strategies take into account the fact that individuals do not become involved with substances solely on the basis of personal characteristics. Rather they are powerfully influenced by a complex set of factors in the environment, such as the rules and regulations of the social institutions to which they belong,the norms of the communities In which they live,the mass media messages to which they are exposed,and the accessibility of alcohol,tobacco and illicit drugs.Because substance abuse is viewed as a product of the overall community system, effective prevention requires making appropriate modifications to the community at large.The purposes of environmental strategies are to(1) limit access to substances,(2)change the culture and contexts within which decisions about substance use are made,or(3)reduce the negative consequences associated with use.(Center for Substance Abuse Prevention. Environmental Prevention Strategies: Putting Theory Into Practice(Training and Resource Guide). Rockville, MD, 1999.) By focusing Federal funds on these environmental strategies, it is more likely that grantees will achieve lasting positive environmental change within their community.The primary focus of the federal grant funding is on coalition development to bring about environmental change that prevents substance abuse at Page-8 Ile community level. Grantees should primarily utilize local funds and in-kind match to support direct services. In so doing,grantees create a sense of ownership of those services within the community that will thrive beyond Federal funding. All responses to special terms and conditions of award and postaward requests must be mailed to the Division of Grants Management, OPS, SAMHSA below: For Regular Delivery: For Overnight or Direct Delivery: Division of Grants Management, Division of Grants Management, OPS, SAMHSA OPS,SAMHSA 1 Choke Cherry Road, Room 7-1091 1 Choke Cherry Road,Room 7-1091 Rockville, MD 20857 Rockville, MD 20850 CONTACTS: Costella Green, Program Official Phone: (240)276-2564 Email:costella.green@samhsa.hhs.gov Fax: (240)276-2580 OJ Eddie Whitehurst, Grants Specialist hone: (240)276-1078 Email: eddie.whitehurst@samhsa.hhs.gov Fax: (240)276-1420 Page-9 Kent City Council Meeting Date October 21, 2008 Category Consent Calendar - 6R 1. SUBJECT: SEX OFFENDER VERIFICATION GRANT - ACCEPT AND ESTABLISH BUDGET 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Authorize the Kent Police Department to accept the Sex Offender Verification grant in an amount not to exceed $61,932.37, to establish a budget for same, and authorize the Mayor to sign all necessary grant documents. King County Sheriff's Office (KCSO) is the recipient of a Washington State Registered Sex and Kidnapping Offender Address and Residency Verification Program grant through the Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs. KCSO is using this grant to partner with local law enforcement agencies, including Kent, and will provide overtime funds to be used to send offender contact teams into the field to make personal contact with every sex offender living within each agencies jurisdiction. The goal is to verify the registration of every offender currently registered, as well as updating their information and obtaining a current photograph of each offender. Face-to-face verification requirements: - Level I offenders, once every 12 months - Level II offenders, once every 6 months - Level III offenders, once every 3 months 3. EXHIBITS: Cost Reimbursement Agreement from the King County Sheriff's Office 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Safety Committee 10 14 08 (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? Y Revenue? Y Currently in the Budget? Yes No X 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Cost Reimbursement Affeement Executed By King County Sheriffs Office,a department of King County, hereinafter referred to as"KCSO," Department Authorized Representative: Susan L. Rahr, Sheriff King County Sheriffs Office W-150 King County Courthouse 516 Third Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 and Kent Police Department a department of King County,hereinafter referred to as ""Contractor," Department Authorized Representative: Steve Strachan, Chief of Police 220-4'h Avenue South Kent,WA 98032 WHEREAS KCSO and Contractor have mutually agreed to work together ether for the g purpose of verifying the address and residency of registered sex and kidnapping offenders; and WHEREAS,the goal of registered sex and kidnapping offender address and residency verification is to improve public safety by establishing a greater presence and emphasis by Contractor in King County neighborhoods; and WHEREAS, as part of this coordinated effort, Contractor will increase immediate and direct contact with registered sex and kidnapping offenders in their jurisdiction, and WHEREAS,KCSO is the recipient of a Washington State Registered Sex and kidnapping Offender Address and Residency Verification Program grant through the Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs for this purpose, and WHEREAS,KCSO will oversee efforts undertaken by program participants in King County; NOW THEREFORE,the parties hereto agree as follows; KCSO will utilize Washington State Registered Sex and Kidnapping Offender Address and Residency Verification Program funding to pay overtime to Contractor for the verification of registered sex and kidnapping offender address and residency as set forth l below. This Interagency Agreement contains eight(8)Articles: ARTICLE I. TERM OF AGREEMENT The term of this Cost Reimbursement Agreement shall commence on July 1, 2008 and shall end on June 30, 2009 unless terminated earlier pursuant to the provisions hereof. ARTICLE II. DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES This agreement is for the purpose of reimbursing overtime expenses incurred by personnel participating in the Registered Sex and Kidnapping Offender Address and Residency Verification Program. The program's purpose is to verify the address and residency of all registered sex and kidnapping offenders under RCW 9A.44.130. The requirement of this program is for face-to-face verification of a registered sex and kidnapping offender's address at the place of residency. In the case of • level I offenders, once every twelve months. • of level II offenders, once every six months. • of level III offenders, once every three months. For the purposes of this program unclassified offenders and kidnapping offenders shall be considered at risk level I, unless in the opinion of the local jurisdiction a higher classification is in the interest of public safety. ARTICLE III. REPORTING Two reports are required in order to receive reimbursement for grant-related expenditures. Both forms are included as exhibits to this agreement. "Exhibit A" is an"Address Verification Form"that the sex or kidnapping offender completes and signs during a face-to-face contact. "Exhibit B"is an"Officer Contact Worksheet" completed in full by an officer/detective during each verification contact. Both exhibits representing each contact are due quarterly and must be comalete and received before reimbursement can be made following the quarter reported. Original signed report forms are to be submitted by the 5th of the month following the end of the quarter. The first report is due October 5, 2008. Quarterly progress reports shall be delivered to Attn: Tina Keller Project Coordinator King County Sheriff's Office 401 Fourth Avenue Kent, WA 98032 Phone: 206-205-7948 Email: tina.keller@kingcounty.gov ARTICLE IV. REIMBURSEMENT Requests for reimbursement will be made on a quarterly basis and should be forwarded to KCSO as soon as practical after the first of the month that follows each quarter ending March 31s`,June 30t', September 30t', and December 31'. Overtime reimbursements for personnel assigned to the Registered Sex and Kidnapping Offender Address and Residency Verification Program will be calculated at the usual rate for which the individuals' time would be compensated in the absence of this agreement. Each request for reimbursement will include the name, rank, overtime compensation rate, number of reimbursable hours claimed and the dates of those hours for each officer for whom reimbursement is sought. Each reimbursement request must be accompanied by a certification signed by an appropriate supervisor of the department that the request has been personally reviewed, that the information described in the request is accurate, and the personnel for whom reimbursement is claimed were working on an overtime basis for the Registered Sex and Kidnapping Offender Address and Residency Verification Program. Requests for reimbursement must be sent to Attn: Joe Lewis, Grant Administrator King County Sheriff s Office 516 Third Avenue, Room W-150 Seattle, WA 98104 Phone: 206-205-7900 Email:joe.lewis@kingcounty.gov The maximum amount to be paid under this cost reimbursement agreement shall not exceed Sixty One Thousand Nine Hundred Thirty Two Dollars and Thirty Seven Cents ($61,932.37). Expenditures exceeding the maximum amount shall be the responsibility of Contractor. All requests for reimbursement must be received by KCSO by July 31, 2009 to be payable. ARTICLE V. WITNESS STATEMENTS "Exhibit C" is a"Sex/Kidnapping Offender Address and Residency Verification Program Witness Statement Form." This form is to be completed by any witnesses encountered during a contact when the offender is suspected of not living at the registered address and there is a resulting felony"Failure to Register as a Sex Offender"case to be referred/filed with the KCPAO. Unless, due to extenuating circumstances the witness is incapable of writing out there own statement,the contacting officer/detective will have the witness write and sign the statement in their own handwriting to contain, verbatim,the information on the witness form. ARTICLE VI. FILING NON-DISCOVERABLE FACE SHEET "Exhibit D"is the"Filing Non-Discoverable Face Sheet." This form shall be attached to each"Felony Failure to Register as a Sex Offender" case that is referred to the King County Prosecuting Attorney's Office. ARTICLE VII. SUPPLEMENTING,NOT SUPPLANTING Funds may not be used to supplant(replace)existing local, state, or Bureau of Indian Affairs funds that would be spent for identical purposes in the absence of the grant. Overtime -To meet this grant condition,you must ensure that: • Overtime exceeds expenditures that the grantee is obligated or funded to pay in the current budget. Funds currently allocated to pay for overtime may not be reallocated to other purposes or reimbursed upon the award of a grant. • Additionally,by the conditions of this grant,you are required to track all overtime funded through the grant ARTICLE VII. AMENDMENTS No modification or amendment of the provisions hereof shall be effective unless in writing and signed by authorized representatives of the parties hereto. The parties hereto expressly reserve the right to modify this Agreement,by mutual agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties have executed this Agreement by having their representatives affix their signatures below. Kent Police Department KING COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE e,FX_ 0 5teue S5 chars, Chte of police Susan L. Rahr��Sh ' 0q0-100V Date Date Kent City Council Meeting Date October 21, 2008 Category Consent Calendar - 6S 1. SUBJECT: STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY GRANT - ACCEPT 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Accept grant funds from State Farm Insurance Company to purchase supplies and materials for car seat inspection events sponsored by the South King County Child Passenger Safety Coalition, amend the budget as required, and authorize the Mayor to sign all necessary documents. Kent Police Department's Public Education Specialists serve on the coalition and are trained as child seat inspectors and installers. 3. EXHIBIT : State Farm Insurance award letter dated 9 808 s / / 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Safety Committee 10/14/08 (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? Y Revenue? Y Currently in the Budget? Yes No X 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: STATE FARM State Farm Insurance Companies® INSURANCE PJ September 12, 2008 Attn: Cesi Velez City of Kent-Police Department 220 Fourth Ave S Kent, WA 98032 RE; Child Passenger Safety Program State Farm Insurance Companies is happy to have the opportunity to help provide funding to support the cost of materials associated with Child Safety Day in 2008 and year-round educational programming. Enclosed is a check for$2000.00. An "Acknowledgement of Contribution"form and return envelope are enclosed. Please complete the form and return it within 30 days in the enclosed envelope. Sincer ly, Nancy C enter Public Affairs Specialist State Farm Insurance 1000 Wilmington Drive DuPont,WA 98327 253-912-6457 srl Enclosure(s) HOME OFFICES- BLOOMINGTON, ILLINOIS 6 1 71 0-0001 Kent City Council Meeting Date October 21, 2008 Category consent Calendar - 6T 1. SUBJECT: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT - AUTHORIZE 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Authorize the Mayor to sign a contract with ICF Jones & Stokes not to exceed $150,000 for a Comprehensive Plan Environmental Impact Statement and Midway Planned Action Ordinance as presented in the Proposed Scope of Work dated August 2008. The new Environmental Impact Statement and Planned Action Ordinance will refresh the basis for future phased SEPA review for the City's expected growth and development, ICF Jones & Stokes will also prepare an environmental analysis of a Planned Action Ordinance for Midway. 3. EXHIBITS: Contract with Scope of Work and Memo from Charlene Anderson dated 10/6/08 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Planning & Economic Development Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? Yes Revenue? No Currently in the Budget? Yes X No 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 55 Fred N. Satterstrom, AICP, Director PLANNING SERVICES • Charlene Anderson, AICP, Manager KENT WAS HI N GTON Phone: 253-856-5454 Fax: 253-856-6454 Address: 220 Fourth Avenue S. Kent, WA 98032-5895 October 6, 2008 TO: Chair Elizabeth Albertson and Planning & Economic Development Committee FROM: Charlene Anderson, AICP, Planning Manager SUBJECT: Comprehensive Plan Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Update For the meeting of October 13, 2008 MOTION: Authorize the Mayor to sign a contract with ICF )ones & Stokes not to exceed $150,000 for a Comprehensive Plan Environmental Impact Statement and Planned Action Ordinance as presented in the Proposed Scope of Work dated August 2008. SUMMARY: Early this summer the City issued a request for Statements of Qualifications from qualified consultants to assist in the City's environmental review of the Kent Comprehensive Plan as well as a Planned Action Ordinance for the Midway corridor in accordance with the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and SEPA Rules. After holding interviews, the city selected ICF Jones & Stokes for the project. The general intent of the project is to refresh the basis for future phased SEPA review for our expected growth and development, and to prepare environmental analysis of a Planned Action Ordinance for Midway. BUDGET IMPACT: $150,000 which is provided in the Capital Budget. BACKGROUND: The City issued a Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Comprehensive Plan adopted in 1995. Since that time, we have issued several addenda to the 1995 EIS. We also have prepared Supplemental EIS documents and utilized other avenues to satisfy the SEPA analysis for utility master plans, annexation comprehensive plan and zoning designations, and other text amendments. An EIS prepared for a comprehensive plan, development regulation, or other broad based policy document is considered "non-project," or programmatic in nature, distinguished from environmental documents prepared for specific project actions, such as a building permit or a road construction project. The purpose of a non-project EIS is to analyze proposed alternatives and to provide environmental consideration and mitigation prior to adoption of an alternative. It is also a document that discloses the process used in evaluating alternatives to decision- makers and citizens. SEPA rules allow environmental review to be phased so that review coincides with meaningful points in the planning and decision-making process. Broader environmental documents may be followed by narrower documents that incorporate general discussion by reference and concentrate solely on issues specific to that proposal. SEPA rules also clearly state that agencies shall use a variety of mechanisms, including addenda, adoption and incorporation by reference, to avoid duplication and excess paperwork. 56 A new Environmental Impact Statement will give the City an opportunity to refresh the basis for future phased SEPA review, plan in advance for expected growth and development, and facilitate decision—maker review of the environmental impacts of the Midway Subarea Plan and Planned Action Ordinance. CA\pm S:\Permit\Plan\Env\2008\COMPPLAN_EIS_UPDATE\CompplanEISUpdate101308.doc Enc: Contract with Proposed Scope of Work cc: Fred N.Satterstrom,AICP,CD Director Charlene Anderson,AICP,Planning Manager Project File Parties of Record PEDC Meeting October 13, 2008 Page 2 of 2 57 • KENO WASHINGTON CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT between the City of Kent and )ones & Stokes Associates, Inc. THIS AGREEMENT is made between the City of Kent, a Washington municipal corporation (hereinafter the "City"), and Jones & Stokes, Associates, Inc. organized under the laws of the State of Delaware, located and doing business at 710 2"d Avenue, Suite 550, Seattle, WA 98104 (206) 801-2800 (hereinafter the "Consultant"). I. DESCRIPTION OF WORK. Consultant shall perform the following services for the City in accordance with the following described plans and/or specifications: See Proposed Scope of Work attached as Exhibit A Consultant further represents that the services furnished under this Agreement will be performed in accordance with generally accepted professional practices within the Puget Sound region in effect at the time those services are performed. II. TIME OF COMPLETION. The parties agree that work will begin on the tasks described in Section I above immediately upon the effective date of this Agreement. Upon the effective date of this Agreement, Consultant anticipates completion of the work described in Section I on or before July 1, 2009. III. COMPENSATION. A. The City shall pay the Consultant, based on time and materials, an amount not to exceed One Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($150,000.00) for the services described in this Agreement. This is the maximum amount to be paid under this Agreement for the work described in Section I above, and shall not be exceeded without the prior written authorization of the City in the form of a negotiated and executed amendment to this agreement. The Consultant agrees that the hourly or flat rate charged by it for its services contracted for herein shall remain locked at the negotiated rate(s) for a period of one (1) year from the effective date of this Agreement. The Consultant's billing rates shall be as delineated in Exhibit A - Table 1. CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT - 1 (Between City of Kent and Jones & Stokes - Comp. Plan EIS Update) 58 B. The Consultant shall submit monthly payment invoices to the City for work performed, and a final bill upon completion of all services described in this Agreement. The City shall provide payment within thirty (30) days of receipt of an invoice. If the City objects to all or any portion of an invoice, it shall notify the Consultant and reserves the option to only pay that portion of the invoice not in dispute. In that event, the parties will immediately make every effort to settle the disputed portion. IV. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. The parties intend that an Independent Contractor-Employer Relationship will be created by this Agreement and that the Consultant has the ability to control and direct the performance and details of its work, the City being interested only in the results obtained under this Agreement. V. TERMINATION. Either party may terminate this Agreement, with or without cause, upon providing the other party thirty (30) days written notice at its address set forth on the signature block of this Agreement. After termination, the City may take possession of all records and data within the Consultant's possession pertaining to this project, which may be used by the City without restriction. If the City's use of Consultant's records or data is not related to this project, it shall be without liability or legal exposure to the Consultant. VI. DISCRIMINATION. In the hiring of employees for the performance of work under this Agreement or any subcontract, the Consultant, its subcontractors, or any person acting on behalf of the Consultant or subcontractor shall not, by reason of race, religion, color, sex, age, sexual orientation, national origin, or the presence of any sensory, mental, or physical disability, discriminate against any person who is qualified and available to perform the work to which the employment relates. Consultant shall execute the attached City of Kent Equal Employment Opportunity Policy Declaration, Comply with City Administrative Policy 1.2, and upon completion of the contract work, file the attached Compliance Statement. VII. INDEMNIFICATION. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officers, officials, employees, and agents harmless from any and all claims, injuries, damages, losses or suits, including all legal costs and attorney fees, arising out of or in connection with the Consultant's negligent acts, omissions or willful misconduct in the performance of this Agreement, except for that portion of the injuries and damages caused by the City's negligence. The City's inspection or acceptance of any of Consultant's work when completed shall not be grounds to avoid any of these covenants of indemnification. Should a court of competent jurisdiction determine that this Agreement is subject to RCW 4.24.115, then, in the event of liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons or damages to property caused by or resulting from the concurrent negligence of the Consultant and the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers, the Consultant's liability hereunder shall be only to the extent of the Consultant's negligence. IT IS FURTHER SPECIFICALLY AND EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD THAT THE INDEMNIFICATION PROVIDED HEREIN CONSTITUTES THE CONSULTANT'S WAIVER OF IMMUNITY UNDER INDUSTRIAL INSURANCE, TITLE 51 RCW, SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS INDEMNIFICATION. THE PARTIES FURTHER ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THEY HAVE MUTUALLY NEGOTIATED THIS WAIVER. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT - 2 (Between City of Kent and Jones & Stokes - Comp. Plan EIS Update) 59 VIII. INSURANCE. The Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement, insurance of the types and in the amounts described in Exhibit B attached and incorporated by this reference. IX. EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION. The City will provide its best efforts to provide reasonable accuracy of any information supplied by it to Consultant for the purpose of completion of the work under this Agreement. X. OWNERSHIP AND USE OF RECORDS AND DOCUMENTS. Original documents, drawings, designs, reports, or any other records developed or created under this Agreement shall belong to and become the property of the City. All records submitted by the City to the Consultant will be safeguarded by the Consultant. Consultant shall make such data, documents, and files available to the City upon the City's request. The City's use or reuse of any of the documents, data and files created by Consultant for this project by anyone other than Consultant on any other project shall be without liability or legal exposure to Consultant. XI. CITY'S RIGHT OF INSPECTION. Even though Consultant is an independent contractor with the authority to control and direct the performance and details of the work authorized under this Agreement, the work must meet the approval of the City and shall be subject to the City's general right of inspection to secure satisfactory completion. XII. WORK PERFORMED AT CONSULTANT'S RISK. Consultant shall take all necessary precautions and shall be responsible for the safety of its employees, agents, and subcontractors in the performance of the contract work and shall utilize all protection necessary for that purpose. All work shall be done at Consultant's own risk, and Consultant shall be responsible for any loss of or damage to materials, tools, or other articles used or held for use in connection with the work. XIII. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS. A. Recyclable Materials. Pursuant to Chapter 3.80 of the Kent City Code, the City requires its contractors and consultants to use recycled and recyclable products whenever practicable. A price preference may be available for any designated recycled product. B. Non-Waiver of Breach. The failure of the City to insist upon strict performance of any of the covenants and agreements contained in this Agreement, or to exercise any option conferred by this Agreement in one or more instances shall not be construed to be a waiver or relinquishment of those covenants, agreements or options, and the same shall be and remain in full force and effect. C. Resolution of Disputes and Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. If the parties are unable to settle any dispute, difference or claim arising from the parties' performance of this Agreement, the exclusive means of resolving that dispute, difference or claim, shall only be by filing suit exclusively under the venue, rules and jurisdiction of the King County Superior Court, King County, Washington, unless the parties agree in writing to an alternative dispute resolution process. In any claim or lawsuit for damages arising from the parties' performance of this Agreement, each party shall pay all its legal costs and attorney's fees incurred in defending or bringing such claim or lawsuit, including all appeals, in addition to any other recovery or award provided by law; provided, however, nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to limit the City's right to indemnification under Section VII of this Agreement. CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT - 3 (Between City of Kent and Jones & Stokes - Comp. Plan EIS Update) 60 D. Written Notice. All communications regarding this Agreement shall be sent to the parties at the addresses listed on the signature page of the Agreement, unless notified to the contrary. Any written notice hereunder shall become effective three (3) business days after the date of mailing by registered or certified mail, and shall be deemed sufficiently given if sent to the addressee at the address stated in this Agreement or such other address as may be hereafter specified in writing. E. Assignment. Any assignment of this Agreement by either party without the written consent of the non-assigning party shall be void. If the non-assigning party gives its consent to any assignment, the terms of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect and no further assignment shall be made without additional written consent. F. Modification. No waiver, alteration, or modification of any of the provisions of this Agreement shall be binding unless in writing and signed by a duly authorized representative of the City and Consultant. G. Entire Agreement. The written provisions and terms of this Agreement, together with any Exhibits attached hereto, shall supersede all prior verbal statements of any officer or other representative of the City, and such statements shall not be effective or be construed as entering into or forming a part of or altering in any manner this Agreement. All of the above documents are hereby made a part of this Agreement. However, should any language in any of the Exhibits to this Agreement conflict with any language contained in this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail. H. Compliance with Laws. The Consultant agrees to comply with all federal, state, and municipal laws, rules, and regulations that are now effective or in the future become applicable to Consultant's business, equipment, and personnel engaged in operations covered by this Agreement or accruing out of the performance of those operations. I. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original, and all of which will together constitute this one Agreement. IN WITNESS, the parties below execute this Agreement, which shall become effective on the last date entered below. CONSULTANT: CITY OF KENT: By: By: (signature) (signature) Print Name: Print Name: Suzette Cooke Its Its Mayor (title) DATE: DATE: CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT - 4 (Between City of Kent and Jones & Stokes - Comp. Plan EIS Update) 61 NOTICES TO BE SENT TO: NOTICES TO BE SENT TO: CONSULTANT: CITY OF KENT: Linda Bentley, Manager Planning/Regulatory Charlene Anderson, Planning Manager Team City of Kent Jones & Stokes Associates, Inc 220 Fourth Avenue South 701 2"d Avenue, Suite 550 Kent, WA 98032 Seattle, WA 9810 (253) 856-5454 (telephone) (206) 801-2800 (telephone) (253) 856-6454 (facsimile) 206 801-2899 facsimile APPROVED AS TO FORM: Kent Law Department P\Planning\Charlene\CompPlan-EISUpdate-CSA-]onesStokes doc CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT - 5 (Between City of Kent and Jones & Stokes - Comp. Plan EIS Update) 63 DECLARATION CITY OF KENT EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY POLICY The City of Kent is committed to conform to Federal and State laws regarding equal opportunity. As such all contractors, subcontractors and suppliers who perform work with relation to this Agreement shall comply with the regulations of the City's equal employment opportunity policies. The following questions specifically identify the requirements the City deems necessary for any contractor, subcontractor or supplier on this specific Agreement to adhere to. An affirmative response is required on all of the following questions for this Agreement to be valid and binding. If any contractor, subcontractor or supplier willfully misrepresents themselves with regard to the directives outlines, it will be considered a breach of contract and it will be at the City's sole determination regarding suspension or termination for all or part of the Agreement; The questions are as follows: 1. I have read the attached City of Kent administrative policy number 1.2. 2. During the time of this Agreement I will not discriminate in employment on the basis of sex, race, color, national origin, age, or the presence of all sensory, mental or physical disability. 3. During the time of this Agreement the prime contractor will provide a written statement to all new employees and subcontractors indicating commitment as an equal opportunity employer. 4. During the time of the Agreement I, the prime contractor, will actively consider hiring and promotion of women and minorities. 5. Before acceptance of this Agreement, an adherence statement will be signed by me, the Prime Contractor, that the Prime Contractor complied with the requirements as set forth above. By signing below, I agree to fulfill the five requirements referenced above. Dated this day of , 200_. BY For: Title: Date: EEO COMPLIANCE DOCUMENTS - 1 CITY OF KENT 64 ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY NUMBER: 1.2 EFFECTIVE DATE: January 1, 1998 SUBJECT: MINORITY AND WOMEN SUPERSEDES: April 1, 1996 CONTRACTORS APPROVED BY Jim White, Mayor POLICY: Equal employment opportunity requirements for the City of Kent will conform to federal and state laws. All contractors, subcontractors, consultants and suppliers of the City must guarantee equal employment opportunity within their organization and, if holding Agreements with the City amounting to $10,000 or more within any given year, must take the following affirmative steps: 1. Provide a written statement to all new employees and subcontractors indicating commitment as an equal opportunity employer. 2. Actively consider for promotion and advancement available minorities and women. Any contractor, subcontractor, consultant or supplier who willfully disregards the City's nondiscrimination and equal opportunity requirements shall be considered in breach of contract and subject to suspension or termination for all or part of the Agreement. Contract Compliance Officers will be appointed by the Directors of Planning, Parks, and Public Works Departments to assume the following duties for their respective departments. 1. Ensuring that contractors, subcontractors, consultants, and suppliers subject to these regulations are familiar with the regulations and the City's equal employment opportunity policy. 2. Monitoring to assure adherence to federal, state and local laws, policies and guidelines. EEO COMPLIANCE DOCUMENTS - 2 65 CITY OF KENT EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMPLIANCE STATEMENT This form shall be filled out AFTER COMPLETION of this project by the Contractor awarded the Agreement. I, the undersigned, a duly represented agent of Company, hereby acknowledge and declare that the before-mentioned company was the prime contractor for the Agreement known as that was entered into on the (date) , between the firm I represent and the City of Kent. I declare that I complied fully with all of the requirements and obligations as outlined in the City of Kent Administrative Policy 1.2 and the Declaration City of Kent Equal Employment Opportunity Policy that was part of the before-mentioned Agreement. Dated this day of , 200 By: For: Title: Date: 1 EEO COMPLIANCE DOCUMENTS - 3 1 1 1 67 1 � EXHIBIT A I t r I 6 1 t 69 City of Kent Comprehensive Plan EIS and PAO PROPOSED SCOPE OF WORK The City of Kent issued a Draft Environmental Impact Statement(EIS) for its Comprehensive Plan in 1994. The Draft EIS analyzed three comprehensive plan land use alternatives and recommended mitigation measures,which were used in preparing comprehensive plan policies. The preferred land use alternative that was incorporated into the Comprehensive Plan was most closely related to Alternative 2 of the Draft EIS (the mixed-use alternative). A Final EIS was issued and the City Council adopted the Comprehensive Plan in 1995. Since then, the City has issued several addenda to the EIS. Additionally, the City recently adopted a new transportation master plan and corresponding update to the transportation element of the comprehensive plan. Now the City would like ICF Jones & Stokes (Consultant) assistance with writing an EIS for its comprehensive plan and potential amendments. There will be two levels of review: 1) citywide (or planning area wide) analysis of potential land use and capital facility actions; 2) detailed analysis of the Midway Subarea. At the citywide level, the actions may include alternative land uses in the potential annexation areas, higher density development in selected activity centers, redistribution of population and employment allocations, new functional plans (e.g., utilities, parks), and/or other items. The EIS would also include analysis for a Planned Action Ordinance for a Midway Subarea Plan that is currently underway,based on either a preferred alternative for the subarea plan or a most intensive alternative to set the"bookend" of the environmental analysis in the subarea. The Planned Action Ordinance would provide a more efficient SEPA review process for future development in the area covered by the Midway Subarea Plan. A new EIS addressing citywide topics would give the City the opportunity to: 7i ■ plan in advance for the expected growth and development, and ■ refresh the basis for future phased SEPA review in the general planning area. A Planned Action EIS would be an opportunity to: ■ integrate analysis from the Midway Subarea Plan into a single document, ■ facilitate citizen and decision-maker review of the environmental impacts of the Midway Subarea Plan, and ■ plan in advance for the expected growth and development and reduce future permitting time. City of Kent Comprehensive Plan EIS August 2008 70 Planned actions are projects that are designated by ordinance, have had their environmental impacts adequately addressed in an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) on the planned action proposal, and implement the proposal addressed in an EIS. The EIS will contain the following sections as required in WAC 197-11: ■ Cover Letter ■ Fact Sheet ■ Table of Contents ■ Chapter 1 - Environmental Summary ■ Chapter 2 - Description of the Alternatives ■ Chapter 3 - Affected Environment, Significant Impacts, and Mitigation Measures ■ Chapter 4 - References ■ Chapter 5 - Distribution List ■ Appendices The document will be prepared as a Planned Action EIS pursuant to WAC 197-11-164 to -172. Task 1 . Project Initiation Task 1.1. Data Collection and Review The Consultant will coordinate with City staff and consultants working on concurrent or recent planning efforts to collect professional literature and data pertinent to EIS tasks. At a minimum, this is anticipated to include: ■ Comprehensive Plan—adopted. ■ City inventories (e.g. critical areas, land use, etc.). ■ Transportation Master Plan—completed. ■ Other City functional plans (e.g. sewer, water, stormwater, parks, etc.)—adopted. ■ Midway Sub-Area planning documents—in progress. Consultant will also review the King County Buildable Lands Report and King County Assessor information as necessary. �-- 2 . 1CF e's .vwoe..lo.rw 71 Task 1.2. Kick-off o Meeting The Consultant will organize and conduct a kick-off meeting with the City to review project information and goals, coordinate SEPA and public participation, confirm the level of technical analysis appropriate to the EIS, and determine the actions that, together, will constitute the Proposed Action Alternative. In addition to the Midway Subarea Plan, the following is an example of citywide actions that may be analyzed as part of the Proposed Action Alternative: new annexations, higher density development in selected activity centers, redistribution of population and employment allocations, new functional plans (e.g., utilities, parks), and other items that may be identified during the kick-off meeting or in the scoping meeting. Following this kick-off meeting, the Consultant will prepare a guidance memo that addresses roles and responsibilities, document approach and format, and other administrative items for use by the Project Team. Task 1.3. SEPA Checklist � The Consultant will prepare a SEPA Checklist that provides a broad and brief review and record of all environmental topics. The Checklist will describe the basis for addressing limited topics further in the EIS and for addressing other topics, such as cultural resources and environmental health, only within the checklist. For example, the SEPA Checklist could briefly summarize cultural resources present citywide and in the subarea based on available inventories and identify the regulations in place that would mitigate impacts at a site-specific level as part of phased environmental or permit review; the checklist can be referenced in the EIS and the Planned Action Ordinance as needed. Based on City staff comments, the Consultant will finalize the SEPA Checklist. Task 1.4. Scoping The Consultant will prepare a Draft Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice that generally describes the proposed planned action process, potential alternatives, and EIS topics. Based on City staff comments, the Consultant will finalize the scoping notice and handout. The notice will be issued together with the SEPA Checklist. During the scoping period, the Consultant will conduct an open house scoping meeting. The consultant will prepare a"frequently asked questions"handout and 2 general information boards (e.g., schedule, process, maps) for the meeting. During the scoping period, Consultant will monitor any public comments received. Following the 21-day scoping period, the Consultant will confirm the scope and approach to the EIS with the City. A brief summary of the Scoping Process will be included in Chapter 2 of the EIS. City of Kent Comprehensive Plan EIS ' August 2008 72 Task 1.5. Proposal and Alternatives Description p p The Consultant will prepare a description of the No Action Alternative and the Proposed Action Alternative for evaluation in the EIS. The No Action Alternative would consist of adopted city plans and regulations. The Proposed Action Alternative includes the actions determined in Task 1.2 (citywide and the Midway Subarea Plan). Based on City staff ' comments, the Consultant will finalize the Alternatives Description. Task 2. Preliminary Draft EIS All Preliminary Draft EIS technical sections will be compiled into an EIS format consistent with SEPA requirements. For each environmental topic, there will be two levels of review: 1) citywide (or planning area wide) analysis of potential land use and capital facility actions; 2) detailed analysis of the Midway Subarea. Task 2.1. General Sections The Consultant will prepare the required fact sheet, as well as table of contents, distribution lists, references and other general sections of the Draft EIS. Task 2.2. Technical Sections Sub-sections of the EIS will address elements of the environment required by SEPA and as determined through the scoping process. For each topic, the following will be identified: the affected environment, impacts common to all alternatives, impacts of each alternative, mitigation measures, and significant unavoidable adverse impacts. At this time, it is anticipated that the elements of the environment include the following categories and their sub-topics: Task 2.2.1. Natural Environment The Consultant will address current conditions, impacts and mitigation measures in terms of earth, surface water, and plants and animals (including fisheries). The citywide analysis will be programmatic and cumulative in nature. The Midway analysis will be focused on the subarea and any significant resources. The citywide and Midway analyses will be based on available information; limited site reconnaissance may be conducted in the Midway area. Appropriate contacts with federal or state agencies will be made depending on the potential presence of any significant resources. No surface water modeling will be conducted. 4 1CFN IR k! I .00.�v.r.. 73 Task 2.2.2. Air Quality The air quality analysis will summarize any available discipline reports or studies available through other planning efforts. If existing information does not capture the proposed change in growth in various areas of the city and the Midway Subarea, the EIS will address a programmatic consistency review between projected City growth levels (that incorporate Midway growth levels), and the growth levels assumed in the PSRC's air quality conformity analysis. The Consultant will contact PSRC to review which city roadway improvements are addressed in PSRC plans that are covered by the air quality conformity analysis. The EIS will briefly summarize existing air quality conditions, the programmatic review of City and PSRC plans and growth levels, and potential Vehicle Miles Traveled by alternative based on the transportation model (see Task 2.2.5). In addition, the Consultant will use the King County greenhouse gas method to compare alternatives, particularly in the Midway area, in terms of the potential to produce greenhouse gas emissions. Policy or code provisions that serve as mitigation measures will be identified. Task 2.2.3. Land Use Patterns/Plans and Policies The Consultant will compare and evaluate the proposed amount, types, scale and pattern of uses in comparison with the existing land use pattern and adjacent development at a citywide and Midway scale. The analysis will include a consistency evaluation of city plans and policies relative to the Proposed Action Alternative. Policy or code provisions that serve as mitigation measures will be identified. ' Task 2.2.4. Aesthetics The Consultant will describe the overall aesthetic character of the city in terms of the quality of the urban environment, the design and character of existing buildings, and building height, bulk and scale. The evaluation will consider the nature and magnitude of change envisioned by the Proposed Action Alternative, including a higher level of detail for the Midway Subarea Plan. The visual character analysis will rely primarily on narrative description, photographs of existing conditions, a map identifying areas where height is likely to change in comparison to adopted and new regulations, and the renderings and materials developed for the subarea plan. Policy or code provisions that serve as mitigation measures will be identified. Task 2.2.5. Transportation See Attachment A for detailed transportation scope. Task 2.2.6. Public Services and Utilities The Consultant will review existing levels of service, estimated needs and demand for service, and projected levels of service under the Proposed Action Alternative for police J City of Kent Comprehensive Plan EIS August 2008 74 and fire protection, parks and recreation, schools, water, wastewater, stormwater, solid waste and other public services as determined through the scoping process. The determination of impacts on police and fire protection, parks and recreation, schools will be based on adopted plans and levels of service together with input collected through agency contact. The analysis of water,wastewater, stormwater, solid waste and other public services will be based on adopted functional plans. The analysis will address the cumulative effect of the alternatives at a citywide scale and note any localized impacts in the Midway area. Task 2.2.7. Noise The Consultant will describe the overall noise character of the city and the Midway Subarea Plan area based on existing reports and data from the traffic study. Consultant will examine the effects of the citywide proposed actions on noise and will also perform an analysis of the Midway Subarea Plan, examining the effects of increased density and transit buses along SR 99, based on the transportation study. The Consultant will not perform field measurements. A narrative will be prepared that describes the existing ambient noise levels and potential increases in noise levels citywide and, for Midway, on SR 99 based on additional bus volumes. Task 2.3. Preliminary Draft EIS Preparation and Review The Consultant will prepare one Preliminary Draft EIS for City staff review. The , Consultant will meet once with the City to obtain comments on the Preliminary Draft ' EIS. City staff will consolidate the City's comments to facilitate the Consultant's efforts on Task 3.1. Task 3. Draft EIS Task 3.1. Draft EIS Preparation Based on a compiled set of comments from reviewers, the Consultant will prepare one public Draft EIS. A print-check copy of the document will be provided to the City to confirm that all requested changes were made and, upon concurrence, Consultant will provide a camera-ready, hard copy of the public document and electronic files suitable for posting on the City's website. The Consultant will prepare a notice of availability for City review and publication. s�� 6 ICF'Slt I .or....rm�. 75 Task 3.2. Draft EIS Comment Period The consultant will support the City in tracking public comments during the 30-day public comment period. Task 4. Final EIS ' Task 4.1. Preliminary Final EIS Contents and Preparation The Consultant will meet with the City to prioritize and assign responsibilities for responses to the comments as appropriate and in accordance with the approved budget. For the purposes of this scope and budget, it is assumed that the Consultant will respond to 20 unique comments. ' The Consultant will prepare a Preliminary Final EIS for City review and comment. The Final EIS will consist of a fact sheet, table of contents, Draft EIS analysis corrections as ' needed, and responses to comments. The Consultant will prepare revisions based on additional or revised analysis. Task 4.2. Meeting to Obtain City Comments on Preliminary Final EIS After the City has reviewed the Preliminary Final EIS, the Consultant will meet with City staff as appropriate to obtain comments. It is assumed that the City staff will compile all department comments for use by the Consultant. Task 4.3. Final EIS Preparation A print-check copy of the public review Final EIS will be provided to the City by the Consultant to confirm requested changes were made satisfactorily. Upon concurrence, the document will be printed and distributed by the City. Web-ready files will be prepared by the Consultant for posting as appropriate. The Consultant will prepare a notice of availability for City review and publication. City of Kent Comprehensive Plan EIS August 2008 76 ' Task 5. Planned Action Ordinance Task 5.1. Planned Action Ordinance Review In conjunction with the EIS process, the Consultant will prepare the ordinance that designates the Planned Action. As outlined in WAC 197-11-168, the ordinance will address: ■ The type of project action; ■ Compliance with the criteria for a planned action; ' ■ Findings related to adequacy of the Planned Action EIS; and ■ Mitigating measures required to qualify future projects as planned actions. ' The Planned Action Ordinance will be as specific as possible, indicating the specific thresholds and mitigating measures necessary for a project to qualify as a planned action. However, for flexibility, ranges of thresholds will be incorporated to the extent feasible. It is anticipated that a Draft Ordinance will be prepared and issued with the Draft EIS, ' and similarly a proposed Final Ordinance will be issued with the Final EIS. Task 5.2. Planned Action Hearing Support A public hearing or other opportunity for public comment is required for adoption of a planned action ordinance. The Consultant will present a report on the Planned Action Ordinance and be available to respond to questions at one City Council public hearing. The City will be responsible for public notice, meeting scheduling and meeting logistics Task 6. Project Management Task 6.1. Project Meetings This task includes an internal start-up meeting with the Consultant team assigned to the project and EIS team meetings at Consultant offices or via teleconference. It also includes general meeting or teleconference time with the Consultant Project Manager and ' City staff. These meetings are in addition to meetings specifically identified in Tasks 1 through 5 and are based on budgeted hours. a I CF & , 77 Task 6.2. s Progress Reports and Billings 9 P 9 ' Each month the Project Manager will provide City with an activity report that highlights services provided and accomplished in the prior month, identifying services to be provided, and listing any outstanding issues to be addressed. Billings will be provided in accordance with the contract requirements. ' Task 6.3. Schedule Management A project schedule will be developed with specific action dates to ensure that the ' Consultant staff and the City team maintain the desired schedule. In conjunction with the monthly activity report, the Project Manager and City staff will assess project progress and discuss actions necessary to ensure that the project remains on schedule and within budget. Deliverables The scope includes the following deliverables: ■ Data needs list ' ■ Guidance memo—document proposed actions; city and consultant roles and responsibilities, document approach and format, etc. ■ SEPA Checklist ■ Scoping Notice ■ Scoping Meeting "frequently asked questions"handout and 2 boards ■ Description of Proposal and Alternatives ■ One Preliminary Draft EIS ■ Print check copy of the public review Draft EIS document to confirm changes ■ Notice of availability of Draft EIS ' ■ Preliminary Final EIS ■ A print-check copy of the public review Final EIS ■ Notice of availability of Final EIS ' ■ Draft and Final Planned Action Ordinance ■ Monthly progress reports 9 City of Kent Comprehensive Plan CIS August 2008 78 ■ Project schedule updates Assumptions The scope includes the following assumptions: ■ Time may be transferred from one task to another due to greater or lesser level of , effort, provided that each task shall be completed and the total budget shall not be exceeded. ■ The City will provide available necessary government documents, studies, site plans, , mapping and other technical information pertaining to the study area, including any appropriate aerial photos, and drawings of areas in the project study area. ' ■ City will prepare all GIS figures for the EIS. Consultant will prepare a list of necessary maps and will review the City's draft maps. ■ Research and data collection will be based on readily available secondary sources of information, including reports, inventories, maps and other similar literature from ' local government and other sources. ■ The City is responsible for document reproduction and distribution of all review and final drafts. All Consultant deliverables will be limited to electronic file transfers. ■ The City will consolidate all internal staff review comments from the City on draft ' review documents and provide a single, complete set of comments to the Consultant Team for revisions. ■ City review and comment on draft documents will occur in accordance with the detailed project schedule. ■ The Consultant Team will not be responsible for delays in the schedule resulting from delays in the provision of critical information or in decision-making by City staff, elected or appointed boards, commissions or citizen groups. ■ The City is not responsible for delays if materials have not been received from the Consultant Team in accordance with the agreed schedule. ■ The City is responsible for web site content displaying EIS materials. ■ City staff will be responsible for meeting notices, room arrangements and other , logistics for public meetings. If recording or meeting notes are desired or required, those will be arranged or provided and paid for by the City. ■ The EIS scope will be based on the outcome of Task 1 Project Initiation. To the extent that scoping identifies unforeseen topics or differences in levels of effort, the 10 Stokes .vt�rro.w 79 City and Consultant will negotiate a mutually acceptable scope and budget for Tasks 2 through 6. r r r r r t r r r r r r r r r r City of Kent Comprehensive Plan EIS August 2008 1 81 ' Attachment A Fehr & Peers/Mirai Transportation Scope 12 82 FEHR & VEERS I_ TRANSPORTATION SCOPE OF WORK COMPREHENSIVE PLAN EIS AND MIDWAY PLANNED ACTION ORDINANCE ' Task I—Coordination with Team This task includes communication with the prime consultant and City staff and will include up to four meetings to coordinate review work products. Fehr& Peers will prepare monthly invoices with progress reports that summarize work completed and progress toward meeting project milestones. Task 2—Update EIS Affected Environment Analysis Comprehensive Plan This task assumes that the affected environment analysis can be taken directly from the City's Transportation Master Plan(TMP) and Transportation Element. This task will document the existing conditions (affected environment) of the transportation system including describing the street system, and analyzing roadway, pedestrian, transit and bicycle facilities, as well as historic crash data. Midway Subarea The analysis for the Midway subarea will be based on available traffic data collected for the City of Kent TMP and the City of Des Moines Transportation Element Update. The evaluation would document the affected environment(existing conditions)describing the street system of the Midway area and analyzing roadway, pedestrian, transit and bicycle facilities. The analysis would include parking and crash data. Deliverable: Transportation Analysis of the Affected Environment Task 3—Evaluation of the No Action Alternative tComprehensive Plan The No Action Alternative is assumed to be the land use evaluated in the TMP. The evaluation assumes that the majority of transportation analysis will be directly pulled from the TMP evaluation and that no new transportation modeling or corridor evaluation will be required. ' 11410 NE 122"d Way,Suite 320 Kirkland,WA 98034-6927 (425)820-0100 F:(425)821-1750 fehrandpeers corn 83 FEHR PEERS Midway Subarea The land use for the No Action alternative for the Midway subarea is assumed to be the same as the 2030 TMP. A separate evaluation will be developed to identify the impacts for the No Action Alternative for the Midway subarea to provide the detail necessary for , the Planned Action Ordinance. The model TAZ structure and roadway network will be refined to provide the detail necessary for the analysis. The analysis of the Midway Subarea will add up to 5 additional intersections to the Comprehensive Plan. A qualitative analysis of impacts to pedestrian and bicycle access and mobility, and transit demand and operation will be developed based on the results from the TMP. Specific mitigation would be identified and planning-level costs estimates developed for up to 5 intersection locations. Deliverable: Transportation Analysis of the No Action Alternative for the Comprehensive Plan and Midway Subarea. Task 4—Evaluation of the Action Alternative ' Comprehensive Plan A single land use alternative (Action Alternative) will be evaluated using the City's 2030 transportation model. The model will be run using the City's base 2030 roadway network. Based on the results of the model, impacts to the transportation system will be identified. Roadway, intersection, pedestrian and bicycle and transit mitigation will be identified. Step in this process will include: • Development of trip generation estimates for the Action Alternative based on the , allocation of 2030 growth to traffic analysis zones provided to Fehr& Peers. • Assignment of traffic using City's traffic model. Model results would be post- processed to estimate the 2030 traffic volumes for intersection and corridor analysis. • Identification of Impacts. Using the Synchro intersection analysis program, the alternative would be evaluated using the City's LOS standard to identify impacts to the roadway system. A qualitative analysis of impacts to transit services, pedestrian and bicycle access and mobility, and transit demand and operation to provide a comparison to the No Action Alternative. • Identification of mitigation measures. For the comprehensive plan evaluation, mitigation measures will be based on transportation projects found in the TMP. 84 P FEHR & DEERS ELVA ' Midway Subarea The land use for the evaluation of the Midway Subarea will be based on the preferred land use assumption developed by the City's Midway Planning Effort. A separate evaluation will be developed to identify the impacts for the Action Alternative for the Midway subarea to provide the detail necessary for the Planned Action Ordinance. The model developed for the Midway Action analysis will be used to identify the impacts and improvements needed to meet the future transportation needs of the subarea. A qualitative analysis of impacts to pedestrian and bicycle access and mobility, and transit demand and operation will also be developed. Step in this process will include: Development of trip generation estimates for the Midway Subarea preferred alternative. Fehr& Peers will adjust the trip generation to reflect the land uses and transportation assumptions of the subarea corridor such as the BRT bus system and eventual light rail extension. Assignment of traffic within the Midway Subarea using the city model. Model results would be post-processed to estimate the 2030 traffic volumes for intersection and corridor analysis. Identification of Impacts. Using the Synchro intersection analysis program, the alternative would be evaluated using the City's LOS standard to identify impacts to the roadway system. A qualitative analysis of impacts to transit services, pedestrian and bicycle access and mobility, and transit demand and operation to provide a comparison to the No Action Alternative for the Midway analysis. Identification of mitigation measures. For the Midway subarea, specific mitigation would be identified and planning-level costs estimates developed for the study locations. This information will identify the costs of expected development that would be incorporated into the planned action ordinance. Deliverable: Transportation Analysis of the Action Alterative and the Midway Subarea Preferred Alternative. Task S—Development of Preliminary EIS Fehr& Peers will develop a transportation section for the PDEIS including summaries of the analysis, graphics and text necessary to describe the affected environment, No Action ' Alternative and Action Alternative. This PDEIS will include both the results of the Comprehensive Plan and Midway Subarea analyses. A copy will be provided to City staff and the prime consultant for review and editorial changes will be incorporated into the document. 85 FEHR & PEERS Deliverable: Transportation Analysis for Preliminary DEIS ' Task 6—Development of DEIS and FEIS Fehr& Peers will provide support in the development of the DEIS document based on comments received from the PDEIS. For the FEIS, the Fehr & Peers will provide responses to comments to up to 10 comments. Additional responses may require a budget amendment. Deliverable: Transportation Analysis for the DEIS and response to comments for the FEIS 1 I 1 1 1 1 ro a 4 io- CA a Vi n C� tat Ct (L Ch co I, co t- wo, fo Cull 00 c EA N KStl� to 00 4) W x LU (D:0:O:0:Q:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:CD:O.0:0:0:0:c):0:0:o:0:0:LO:to: (D:Q:O. 0 01":V:10:0:•0:•csj:00:0:0:00•-C-4.6%.00-(0-&a.-C%l-C'4-C-4-— .cil. M: :R: •t'-'.C�: , 69:C'J:"r: CO:CD, cli : "�. (R.al. Cli ca IT:a: 04:-: :C-4: 0) No 69 0) � &1, 6,!,:6"':69 �:6q:603.:co:60:w:6e,: :60": :69: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . va, 0:O.O.O.0:0:0:0:0:O.0:0:0.:0:O.O.O.0:0:O.0:0: :CD:0: _I 69, 69:(a:6091: .a.60.61>:tl�: 69:to. O. . . . . . . . CI). 4 u Cli: 01: I 0 . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .................. ...... ......... ........... .............. CD 0) M:0 a . . . CD:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:C>:a:a:c):0:0:0:C:5:C>:a:0:C�:a:0:0:c):o:CD:a:,%:o:0:0: C) 60:� CN: 00.CD-69:'�T-CO:01 0:C-4:OD:64:O.CD:C-4:GO•CO:M: CC W:03�•CM:C-4:N't4:C-4:Cli: 0:Q:0: Cl): -6 (q (q:cli: V�:cli .cli 1q act: : : : vi.Vi 0?1 -, : L, "- C�L. :"-:'. *k:'t.': Clt V: t-:. 10:W": 01:61:C,): 6FII:69• :V 611, - 6% 69 to: CM:Cn: CsJ:Cn:V:M:M:C4: to.Gog.: 3 6% 6�>.eq, 6o,603 69 vj� V� ea, OD co U-) 0 to Cl) 61� cn :Yr . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .......................... ...... ...... ......... GO:04: OD: 04: CO: CO 0 CD Cj , Cj en CCL CL ca < fA co • ........... .................... co: . . . . . . . .;. CJ: (D: cm: N CD C) V. N. : 0 M. N tca CO CO 0 CL LL . . { . . . ---r--4---r-4-4---}--v........r--i--- CO* 0: • to: 2 aw C CL 0 c 5 0 0 613- E z c � U) OD: C c1l N : (c): to: CO 0 0 C,): L) 0 0 5 < 0 12. 0 ..................................................... ................................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0 . . . . 00 0 0 U) 0 Cli 0 -c (A ... ...... ............ .................... .. '.co M. :W.: w ca M. Lo 0) 0 8 to LQ 0 =0 fA 0 LE ................... co: co: C:). V.V. . .Q. . . .N. . .C). M;,. to. . Q �r 0 Q ID: 04: N. M. O. N: &!� NNVi 0 C) co q: . . . . . . cm: co:co: ID:co:0: co: co:N h 0 0 V c,q O to0 co ca 2 ................................... .......................................... N; V: 10: 04: 10 V: co CD o co N C', Lq U) O CL . . . . . . . . . . . 0) (D IZ -6 S? . . . . .. . . . . . . x . . . . . . . . . . M:LU: . . . . . 00 W: 02-:(,L: In 9?. a.: c 0 CL: ": C: : C:. :Z: E. . . . a: 0 C/) 2l I a 8.. r: Eo--Lo): co: I co: 0 a): A? LLJ E:W. a W C; 0 ro: c a): 0: E2:0:O.M: . . . LO f Co. a: : . 00 co 0. t:. ro-: 8: C-": 0. a. C. r r IV (D: :L,,0. 0): 0 cm r Q.-1 :2. -- g. S. CL 10: u): -9: ON CL' E 0: 0 .0 M. n. C, U. CL M: (�D: ol U)* E as' ae - 0: u)'-'0-:L) ru 'TT S:.E: L 0) C:M: 0: W. E.-E-:-:'00: E: C: '9 'Do < CO cL: CL E. a: 16: �= 2 -- -6 w Q. Q. - ED 9:LO: 0: Uj:LU: 10: c: r-: r-: 2 0) _j .9 4, : (0:<l: 01 CO: LU: 8: 2: Z:<. . . Z. .W. C. _:C4:M: 0— — CL, LL. 0.CL* co U):0):D_ c CL CL cq:-:N:N:N. CJ:C4:M: N: x CL CL I N:cn:'T V.u).Co.P, U.. x a. 0 L,:(L C,: K Ci: N.N:CN:N:N:N..N.cm.N..cm: M.O. NV M 0 CL je: 0 0 0 C> m oi cn m 0) U) U) w 0) w 0 M. M, M. M. M, M. Mg. M-. 0: mo: mo: m,: 101: OM:lm): 0. -M rA 7 N N " N N = ol Kent City Council Meeting Date October 21, 2008 Category Consent Calendar - 6U 1. SUBJECT: POLICE DEPARTMENT LOW SLOPE RE-ROOFING PROJECT - ACCEPT AS COMPLETE 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Accept the Police Department Low Slope Re- Roofing Project as complete. On May 20, 2008, Council awarded a Public Works Agreement to Wayne`s Roofing to complete the Police Department Low Slope Re-Roofing Project. The project is complete and was approved by the Project Manager on September 4, 2008. 3. EXHIBITS: Letter of 20084 acceptance dated 9 p ! / 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Parks Staff (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) x 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? N/A Revenue? N/A Currently in the Budget? Yes No 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: FACILITIES MANAGEMENT Charles Lindsey Superintendent 220 4th Avenue South ' KEN T Kent, WA 98032 WASHINGTON Fax: 253-856-6080 PHONE: 253-856-5080 September 4, 2008 Donald Guthrie Wayne's Roofing, Inc. 13105 Houston Rd. Sumner, Wa. 98390 RE: Cityof Kent Police Department Low Slope Reroofing P P 9 Dear Donald Guthrie: I have made a final inspection of the City of Kent Police Department Low Slope Reroofing Project and found that the project is completed to my satisfaction. This letter serves as final acceptance of the Public Works Agreement for the City of Kent Police Department Low Slope Reroofing Project effective as of September 4, 2008. The one-year warranty period for labor will remain in effect through September 4, 2009. The ten-year warranty period for materials will remain in effect through September 4, 2018. Please make sure that all necessary State documents have been completed and filed. If you have any questions, please call me at (253)856-5081. S' ly, ' Charles (Charlie) Lindsey, Superintendent of Facilities W � C: Jeff Watling, Parks Director Recreation & Community Services Chauntelle Kristek, Project Accountant CL/rg ®MAYOR SUZETTE COOKE City of Kent Parks, Recreation &Community Services Jeff Watling, Director Kent City Council Meeting Date October 21, 2008 Category Consent Calendar - 6V 1. SUBJECT: NURSERY FACILITY RETAINING WALL PROJECT - ACCEPT AS COMPLETE 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Accept the Nursery Facility Retaining Wall Project as complete. On August 5, 2008, Council awarded the Public Works Agreement to Nortec Construction to complete the Nursery Facility Retaining Wall Project. The project is complete and approved by the Project Manager on October 9, 2008. 3. EXHIBITS: Letter of acceptance dated 10/9/08 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Parks Staff (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? N/A Revenue? N/A Currently in the Budget? Yes No 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: FACILITIES MANAGEMENT Charles Lindsey Superintendent 220 4tn Avenue South 10E-1 Kent, WA 98032 WASHINGTON Fax: 253-856-6080 �P�i Ol1b>Er:..-253�,856-5080 October 9, 2008 Paul Blinn Nortec Construction 23444 30th Ave S #101 Kent, Wa. 98032 RE: City of Kent Nursery Facility Retaining Wall Dear Paul Blinn: I have made a final inspection of the City of Kent Nursery Facility Retaining Wall Project and found that the project is completed to my satisfaction, This letter serves as final acceptance of the Public Works Agreement for the City of Kent Nursery Facility Retaining Wall effective as of September 30, 2008. The one-year warranty period will remain in effect through September 30, 2009. Please make sure that all necessary State documents have been completed and filed. If you have any questions, please call me at (253)856-5081. Si Y, Charles (Charlie) Lindsey, Superintendent of Facilities C: Jeff Watling, Parks Director Recreation & Community Services 3 Chauntelle Kristek, Project Accountant U 3 CL/rg 3 0 MAYOR SUZETTE COOKE City of Kent Parks, Recreation &Community Services Jeff Watling, Director Kent City Council Meeting Date October 21, 2008 Category. Other Business - 7A 1. SUBJECT: COTTAGE HOUSING DEMONSTRATION ORDINANCE - ADOPT 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Adoption of the proposed ordinance would authorize an application process for development of up to two (2) cottage housing projects that demonstrate a housing choice not currently available in Kent's single family neighborhoods. Cottage Housing Development is an alternative type of development made up of detached small single-family residences (cottages) clustered around a common open space with garages and parking located away from the houses. The Land Use and Planning Board recommended approval of this code change following a public hearing at its September 22, 2008, meeting. 3. EXHIBITS Ordinance and Staff memo to PEDC from Erin George & Katie B S g Heinitz dated 10/6/08 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Planning & Economic Develo m nt Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. FISCAL IMPACT Expenditure? No Revenue? No Currently in the Budget? Yes No 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember W"_-- moves, Councilmember seconds to adopt Ordinance No. , authorizing an application process for development of up to two (2) cottage housing demonstration projects. DISCUSSION: ACTION: 1J� 11 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Fred N. Satterstrom, AICP, Director PLANNING SERVICES Charlene Anderson, AICP, Manager KEN T WASHINGTON Phone: 253-856-5454 Fax: 253-856-6454 Address: 220 Fourth Avenue S. Kent, WA 98032-5895 October 6, 2008 TO: Chair Elizabeth Albertson and Planning & Economic Development Committee Members FROM: Erin George, Planner and Katie Heinitz, Assistant Planner RE: Cottage Housing Demonstration Ordinance CPA-2008-2/KIVA #RPP6-2081199 For the meeting of October 13, 2008 MOTION: I move to approve/deny/modify the recommendations of the Land Use & Planning Board to adopt the Cottage Housing Demonstration Ordinance. SUMMARY: On April 14 and June 9, 2008 staff met with the Planning & Economic Development Committee (PEDC) and the Land Use & Planning Board (LUPB), respectively, to discuss the feasibility of cottage housing in Kent. A draft Cottage Housing Demonstration Ordinance was brought to the LUPB workshop on August 11, 2008 and to LUPB public hearings on August 25 and September 22, 2008. The Board recommends approval of the ordinance with staff recommendations, and also recommends reducing the maximum number of demonstration projects to two (2) instead of three (3). BUDGET IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND: Cottage housing developments typically consist of small detached single family residences clustered around a common open space, with garages and parking located away from the houses. Preparation of this demonstration ordinance was prompted by interest in bringing cottage housing to Kent, as expressed by City Council, along with several homeowners and the Cottage Company (a builder of these developments in the Puget Sound region). In response to this interest, staff studied several cottage developments in the region, and developed a Cottage Housing Demonstration Ordinance to allow a limited number of these developments in Kent. The draft Demonstration Ordinance was reviewed by the City Attorney's Office and the managers of Development Engineering, Fire Prevention, Environmental Engineering and Planning Services, whose comments were incorporated into the draft. The draft was also sent out to several members of the development community for review, including the Cottage Company, Master Builders Association and various individual developers. The SEPA Responsible Official has determined that SEPA is not required for this Demonstration Ordinance. EG/KH/pm :S:\Permit\Plan\COMP_PLAN_AMENDMENTS\2008\CPA-2008-2_Cottage_Housing\PEDC\101308_PEDCMemo.doc Attach: Cottage Housing Demonstration Ordinance cc: Fred Satterstrom,AICP,CD Director Charlene Anderson,AICP,Planning Manager Project File ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, to allow development of a limited number of cottage housing projects that demonstrate a housing choice not currently available in Kent's single family neighborhoods. RECITALS A. The purpose of this demonstration ordinance is to assess the viability of cottage housing in Kent. In support of Comprehensive Plan Goals LU-10 and H-5 this demonstration ordinance allows development of a limited number of projects that demonstrate a housing choice not currently available in Kent's single family neighborhoods. The City will use this demonstration ordinance to allow for construction of demonstration projects and will analyze adoption of a permanent cottage housing ordinance upon completion of the demonstration projects. B. On August 8, 2008, the City requested and was granted expedited review on August 25, 2008, from the State of Washington under RCW 36.70A.106 of the City's intent to adopt the Cottage Housing Demonstration Ordinance. C. The City's SEPA responsible official has determined that SEPA is not required for the Cottage Housing Demonstration Ordinance. 1 Cottage Housing Demonstration D. The City's Planning and Economic Development Committee reviewed and discussed the Cottage Housing Demonstration Ordinance at its meetings on April 14, 2008, and October 13, 2008. Development of the Cottage Housing Demonstration Ordinance and the public involvement process continued with Land Use and Planning Board workshops on June 9 and August 11, 2008, and public hearings on August 25 and September 22, 2008. The City Council adopted the Cottage Housing Demonstration Ordinance on October 21, 2008. ORDINANCE SECTION 1. — General Authority. A. Purpose. The purpose of this demonstration ordinance is to allow development of a limited number of projects that demonstrate a housing choice not currently available in Kent's single family neighborhoods, in support of Comprehensive Plan Goals LU-10 and H-5. The City will use this demonstration ordinance to allow for construction of demonstration projects to assess the viability of cottage housing in Kent. Adoption of a permanent cottage housing ordinance will be discussed upon completion of the construction of demonstration projects. B. Goals. The goals of this ordinance are to: 1. Provide a housing type that responds to changing household sizes and ages (e.g., retirees, small families, single person households); 2. Provide opportunities for ownership of small, detached dwelling units within a single-family environment; 3. Encourage creation of more usable open space for residents of the development through flexibility in density and lot standards; 4. Promote high quality design; , 5. Allow flexibility in site and design standards while promoting 2 Cottage Housing Demonstration projects that ensure compatibility with surrounding land uses and existing single-family developments; 6. Implement goals and policies of the Kent Comprehensive Plan. SECTION 2. - Definitions. Definitions in this section will prevail if they conflict with terms defined in Kent City Code. Definitions for terms identified in Kent City Code, and not in this section shall apply. A. Carriage Unit. A single-family unit, not to exceed eight hundred (800) square feet in gross floor area, located above a garage structure. B. Cottage. A detached, single-family dwelling unit containing one thousand five hundred (1,500) square feet or less of gross floor area. C. Cottage Housing Development. An alternative type of development made up of detached small single-family residences (cottages) clustered around a common open space with garages and parking located away from the houses. D. Floor Area Ratio (FAR). A measure of development intensity which is determined by dividing the square footage of the aggregate gross floor area of all units area by the square footage of the entire site. The square footage used for the entire site shall not include critical areas and their associated buffers. SECTION 3. - Applicable Use Zones. The housing types described in this ordinance may be used only in the following single family and multifamily zones: SR-4.5, SR-6, SR-8, MR-D, MR-T12, MR-T16, MR-G, MR-M, MR-H. 3 Cottage Housing Demonstration SECTION 4. - Selection and Permit Process for Cottage Housing Demonstration Projects. A. Following adoption of this demonstration ordinance, Planning Services shall publish a Notice of Call for Proposals. Notice will be sent to the Kent Reporter, posted on the website, sent to local engineering companies, media contacts, Master Builders Association, and others. There will be a one hundred eighty (180) day timeframe "submittal period" during which proposals may be submitted. i B. The City shall use the following process to review and select cottage housing demonstration projects: 1. Pre-submittal meeting requirements. a. Potential applicants must schedule a pre-submittal meeting with City staff prior to submitting a formal proposal. This meeting will give City staff the chance to review with the applicant the requirements for stormwater, roads, open space, parking, cottage design, etc. 2. Following the pre-submittal meeting, the applicant shall submit a full and complete proposal to Planning Services which includes the following: a. A completed City of Kent application form. The form shall include owner and applicant information, as well as the name and contact information for the builder and any design professionals involved in the project. b. A conceptual site plan of the proposed development. C. Conceptual drawings of the proposed cottage houses, including building footprints, elevations, and floor plans. d. A description of how the proposed development minimizes adverse impacts to the surrounding neighborhood. For 4 Cottage Housing Demonstration example, describe what was considered during site layout and building selection to enhance the neighborhood and minimize adverse impacts to the surrounding community. e. A description of how the proposed development complies with all selection criteria and development standards for a cottage housing demonstration project as described in the Ordinance. f. General information about the site including the number of allowed and proposed dwelling units, parking, open space, pervious and impervious surface, building heights, and sustainable development techniques. g. Photographs of the site and adjacent properties. h. Any additional information or material specified at the pre-submittal meeting. 3. Proposal Selection Process. a. Evaluation of the proposals shall be based on the following selection criteria: (1) Demonstration that the project has been designed to enhance and minimize adverse impacts to the surrounding jneighborhoods and community. (2) Demonstration that the project impacts are substantially equivalent to or less than the adverse impacts expected to be associated with development of conventional housing on the subject property, in regards to parking, building height, building bulk, setbacks, lot coverage, open spaces, screening, and aesthetics. (3) Demonstration that the project will result in a unique cottage style community that is distinct from typical single family developments in Kent. This community shall incorporate a high level of quality and originality throughout the development, including but not limited to the following areas: i. Site design; 5 Cottage Housing Demonstration ii. Architectural design; iii. Building materials; iv. Open space; V. Parking; vi. Landscaping; and vii. Sustainable development. (4) The proposal provides elements that contribute to a sense of community within the development by including elements such as front entry porches, common open space, and common buildings. (5) The structures proposed for the cottage housing development are diverse in appearance, yet remain connected through use of architectural style, details, color, and materials. (6) Examples of previous developments done by those involved in the project and explanation of related experience. (7) Demonstration that the selected site for the cottage housing community supports Smart Growth techniques by providing accessibility to commercial services, alternative transportation modes, and recreational opportunities. 4. Upon expiration of the submittal period, the Cottage Housing Committee ("committee") shall convene to review all submitted proposals. The committee will be made up of the following members, or as otherwise appointed by the Planning Manager or designee: (a) Planning and Economic Development Committee Chair; (b) Land Use and Planning Board Chair; (c) Planning Manager; (d) Development Engineering Manager; and (e) Economic Development Manager. 5. All five members of the committee shall be present for a decision to be made on selection of a proposal. From the proposals submitted, the committee may select up to two (2) demonstration projects 6 Cottage Housing Demonstration that demonstrate exceptional design quality and consistency with the selection criteria. If no proposals are submitted, or the proposals do not meet the selection criteria, the timeline for proposal submittals may be extended another 180 days, as determined by the committee. Extensions beyond this period require City Council approval. The committee's decision in selecting cottage housing developments to advance to the formal application phase shall be in writing and shall be the final decision of the City. 6. Permit Process. a. Once a proposal has been selected by the committee, the applicant shall have ninety (90) days to submit a formal application to Planning Services. The applicant may request in writing a maximum extension of three (3) months, subject to the approval of the Planning Manager. b. A formal application shall include the following items: (1) A completed City of Kent application form; (2) An environmental checklist (if applicable); (3) A site plan of the proposed development which includes all applicable items noted in the City of Kent DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE BROCHURE #2; (4) Drawings of the proposed cottage houses, including building footprints, elevations, and floor plans. Design review for the buildings will be evaluated at this stage for consistency with the cottage housing criteria; (5) Tree Preservation Plan; (6) Stormwater Technical Information Report; (7) Critical areas studies, as required by the City of Kent Public Works Department; and (8) Narrative on how the project meets Low Impact Development Standards, if applicable. 7 Cottage Housing Demonstration C. Applications for projects with nine (9) or less residential lots shall be subject to the Process II Standards, as outlined in Chapter 12.01 Kent City Code (KCC) for short plats. Applications for projects with ten (10) or more lots shall be subject to the Process III Standards, as outlined in Chapter 12.01 KCC for subdivisions. Applications for condominium projects shall be processed in the same manner as a short plat, as outlined in Process II in Chapter 12.01 KCC, in regards to i public notice, administrative approval, and validity. 1 SECTION S. - Development and Design Standards for Cottage HousinL7 Demonstration Protects. Parameters identified in this section will apply to cottage housing demonstration projects only and will prevail if they conflict with the regulations specified in Chapters 12 and 15 KCC. A. Development Standards. Cottage Carriage' Max Unit Size 1,500 square feet 800 square feet For single family zones: allowable density is the same as the underlying zone, unless the Low Impact Development (LID) techniques listed in subsection B.10 of this section are incorporated, then 2 times the maximum number of dwelling Density3,4 units allowed in the underlying zone shall be permitted, up to 12 units per acre. For multifamily zones: allowable density is the same as the underlying zone and LID techniques listed in subsection B.10 of this section are required for cottage housing developments. Minimum Lot None Size per unit Max Floor 35 Area Ratio (FAR) Min. 6 units Development Sizes Max. 24 units Allowed when included in a Minimum cluster 6: 6 units cottage project. Maximum cluster: 12 units Parking Requirements' 1.8 spaces per unit if on-street parking is provided, 2 if there is (See subsection B.8 of this section) no on-street parking 8 Cottage Housing Demonstration Cottage Carriage' 9 Minimum Development Front: 20' Perimeter Setbacks8 Other: 10' Maximum Impervious o Surfaces9 50/o 25', where minimum roof slope of 6:12 for all parts of the roof Maximum Height above 18' are provided. Otherwise, 18'. Tree Retention Standards contained in KCC 15.08.240 for Tree Retention shall apply. Cottages shall be designed around significant trees. Accessory Dwelling Not permitted as part of a cottage development.(ADUs) 1 This housing type is only allowed where it is included in a cottage project and is counted towards the development density. Z Any additions or increases in unit sizes after initial construction shall be subject to the cottage housing development standards. Cottages may not be more than one thousand (1,000) square feet on the main floor. 3 Existingdetached dwelling units may remain on the subject property and 9 Y ] P P Y will be counted towards the density. Existing dwelling units shall be remodeled to be consistent with the exterior architectural design elements of the development. The dwelling unit may not exceed the existing square footage or the maximum square footage allowed for a new cottage, whichever is greater. 4 When determining the maximum allowed number of units for a cottage housing development, the entire site area may be included in the calculation. If calculations result in a fraction, the fraction shall be rounded to the nearest whole number as follows: fractions above one-half (1/2) shall be rounded up, fractions of one-half (1/2) and below shall be rounded down. i 9 Cottage Housing Demonstration 5 Carriage units may be included within a cottage housing proposal, provided that the number of carriage units do not exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the total number of units in the project. 6 Cluster size is intended to encourage a sense of community among residents and the homes within a cluster generally orient toward each other, community open space, or pathways and are not separated by roads or critical areas. A development site may contain more than one cluster, with a clear separation between clusters. Furthermore, clusters shall be connected via pedestrian pathway(s). ' Garages may count towards the parking count if, through a covenant, they are reserved only for the parking of vehicles. 8 Perimeter setback areas are to be designated for landscaping, in accordance with subsection B.9 of this section. 9 Maximum impervious surface is calculated using the entire development site. Lot coverage for individual lots may vary. B. Design Standards. 1. Orientation of Dwelling Units. Dwellings within a cottage housing development shall be clusters and homes within the clusters shall be oriented to promote a sense of community within the development. The planning manager shall have the authority to waive or modify specific requirements for dwelling unit orientation to insure this intent is met and to allow for flexibility and innovation in design. a. Each dwelling unit shall have a primary entry and/or covered porch oriented to the common open space or pathway connecting to the common open space. b. Each dwelling unit abutting a public right-of-way (not including alleys) shall incorporate fagade modulation, windows, and 10 Cottage Housing Demonstration roofline variations to avoid blank walls that orient to the public right-of- way. 2. Variation in Unit Sizes, Building, and Site Design. Cottage projects shall establish building and site design that promote variety and visual interest. a. Projects shall include a variety of unit sizes within a single development. b. Proposals shall provide a variety of building styles, features, colors, and site design elements within cottage housing communities. Dwellings with the same combination of features and treatments shall not be located adjacent to each other. Identical elements shall not be repeated in more than twenty-five percent (25%) of the cottages in the development. C. Design of carriage units shall be of similar character with that of the cottages included in the project. d. Cottages may not be more than one thousand (1,000) square feet on the main floor. 3. Community Buildings. Community buildings are required in cottage developments. a. Community buildings shall be at least five hundred (500) square feet on the main floor and shall be of similar architectural character to the dwelling units. b. Building height for community buildings shall be the same standard as for cottages. C. Community buildings must be located on the same site as the cottage housing development, and be commonly owned by the residents. 4. Storage Space. If garages are reserved only for the parking of vehicles through a covenant, alternative storage space onsite shall be provided. The development shall include thirty (30) square feet of storage 11 Cottage Housing Demonstration space per dwelling unit. The storage space shall be in one or more of the following forms: a. Detached sheds, designed in similar character of that of the dwelling units. May be individual or shared sheds. b. Storage space within the detached parking structures (additional rooms, area for shelving, etc.) that does not conflict with the parking of vehicles in the garages. C. Storage space within the dwelling unit, accessible only through an external door. d. Designated storage space attached to the community building that is not counted towards the five hundred (500) square foot minimum. e. Other storage space options approved in writing by Planning Services. 5. Required Common Open Space. Common open space shall i provide visual relief and a sense of community for cottage developments. It must be located outside of critical areas and their buffers. The common open space shall be of a general character similar to single family residential yard areas and provide similar opportunities for use. Elements of the single family residential yard areas that may be included in the common open space are lawns, community garden space, patio/seating, and cooking areas, etc. a. A minimum of 400 square feet of common open space per dwelling unit shall be provided. b. Each area of common open space in each cluster shall be in one contiguous and usable piece with a minimum dimension of twenty (20) feet on all sides. C. Required common open space may be divided into no more than one (1) separate area per cluster of dwelling units. j 12 Cottage Housing Demonstration d. Common open space shall be located in a centrally located area and be easily accessible physically and visually to all dwellings within the development. e. Fences may not be located within or around required common open space areas. f. Landscaping located in common open space areas shall be designed to allow for easy access and use of the space by all residents, to accommodate principles of Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (OPTED), and to facilitate maintenance needs. Existing mature trees shall be retained in this area, as appropriate for site design. g. Unless the shape or topography of the site precludes the ability to locate units adjacent to the common open space, the following standards must be met: (1) The open space shall be located so that it will be surrounded by cottages or common buildings on at least three (3) sides; (2) At least fifty percent (50%) of the units in the development shall abut a common open space. A cottage is considered to "abut" an area of open space if there is no structure, road, or critical area between the unit and the open space. 6. Private Open Space. (1) Each cottage unit must have a covered porch with a minimum area of sixty-four (64) square feet per unit and a minimum dimension of seven (7) feet on all sides. Porches shall be associated with primary point of entry. (2) Each carriage unit shall have a deck or balcony, oriented toward the common open space. (3) In addition to porches, at least three hundred (300) square feet of private, contiguous, usable open space adjacent to each individual dwelling unit shall be provided to contribute positively to the visual appearance of the development, promote diversity in planting 13 Cottage Housing Demonstration materials, and utilize generally accepted good landscape design. The private open space shall be oriented toward the common open space as much as possible and shall have no dimension less than ten (10) feet. The private open space shall define private residences from common areas, trails, and parking areas. Fences surrounding these spaces shall be a maximum height of three feet and shall be wrought iron, cedar split rail, picket, or similar fencing material. 7. Pedestrian Flow through Development. Pedestrian connections shall link all buildings to the: a. Public right-of-way; b. Common open space; C. Parking areas; and d. Other cottage clusters in the development. The pedestrian walkways shall meet International Building Code requirements for accessibility. 8. Shared Detached Garages and Surface Parking Design. Parking areas shall be located so their visual presence and associated noise are minimized, both within and outside the development. These areas shall also maintain the single-family character along public streets. a. Shared detached garage structures may not exceed four (4) single-car garage doors per building. Carriage units are preferred j above these garage structures. b. For shared detached garages, the design of the j structure must be of similar character to that of the dwelling units within the development. C. Shared detached garage structures and surface parking areas must be screened from streets outside the development and adjacent residential uses by landscaping or architectural screening. d. If garage structures are counted toward the required number of parking stalls, these structures shall be reserved through a 14 Cottage Housing Demonstration covenant for the parking of vehicles owned by the residents of the development. Storage of items which preclude the use of the parking spaces for vehicles is prohibited. e. Surface parking areas may not be located in rows of more than six (6) spaces. Parking rows must be separated by a distance of at least twenty (20) feet. 9. Landscaping. The intent of these landscaping requirements is to enhance to overall appearance of the cottage housing development and to give the development an appearance of establishment. a. Cottage housing developments shall incorporate a landscape master plan, designed and stamped by a professional landscape architect, and include the following elements: (1) All landscaped areas (except that which is in private open spaces) shall be densely planted with a variety of decorative trees, shrubs, groundcovers, and other plants. (2) Landscaping shall be located adjacent to all pathways and common open spaces and shall screen parking areas. (3) Perimeter setback areas shall be landscaped in a manner that results in a dense landscape screen. (4) Perimeter trees shall be maintained and incorporated in the master landscape plan. (5) Landscaping shall be included within private open space, which shall be consistent with the overall landscape concept. (6) The landscape design shall exhibit sensitivity to principles of Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED). (7) Maintenance of landscaping (except that which is in private open spaces) shall be the responsibility of the Homeowners' Association. b. Standards contained in KCC 15.08.240 for Tree Retention shall apply. Cottages shall be designed around significant trees. 15 Cottage Housing Demonstration Within perimeter setbacks, all significant trees which do not constitute a safety hazard shall be retained. 10. Low Impact Development. a. For single family zones, density bonuses will only be granted if all of the following low impact development (LID) techniques are met. LID techniques are not required if the proposal does not include a density bonus. LID techniques are required for cottage housing , developments in multifamily zones. b. When required, the proposed site design shall incorporate the use of LID strategies to meet stormwater management standards. C. LID is a set of techniques that mimic natural watershed hydrology by slowing, evaporating/transpiring, and filtering water, which j allows water to soak into the ground closer to its source. The design shall implement the following objectives: (1) Grading disturbance limited to roadway and building pad preparation. Removal and compaction of topsoils shall be minimized and soils may be amended to facilitate LID techniques. The replacement of topsoils on all pervious areas disturbed by construction shall be replaced. (2) Use of pervious materials for a fifty percent (50%) of non-public driving and walking surfaces if soil type allows for infiltration. (3) Treatment of stormwater in numerous small, decentralized structures, which include the use of multifunctional open drainage systems such as vegetated swales or filter strips which also help to fulfill landscaping and open space requirements. (4) Other options meeting the intent of this section and approved in writing by Planning Services and Public Works. 16 Cottage Housing Demonstration SECTION 6. - Severability. If any one or more section, subsections, or sentences of this ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 7. - Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days from and after its passage as provided by law. SUZETTE COOKE, MAYOR ATTEST: BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: TOM BRUBAKER, CITY ATTORNEY PASSED: day of 12008. APPROVED: day of , 2008. PUBLISHED: day of , 2008. I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No. passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the City of Kent as hereon indicated. (SEAL) BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK P\Civil\Ordinance\CottageHousingDemonstratlon doc 17 Cottage Housing Demonstration REPORTS FROM STANDING COMMITTEES AND STAFF A. COUNCIL PRESIDENT tB. MAYOR C. OPERATIONS COMMITTEE D. PARKS AND HUMAN SERVICES COMMITTEE E. PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE F. PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE ' G. PUBLIC WORKS H. ADMINISTRATION REPORTS FROM SPECIAL COMMITTEES 1 KENT WASH I N O T O N OPERATIONS COMMITTEE MINUTES SEPTEMBER 16, 2008 Committee Members Present: Debbie Raplee, Tim Clark, and Les Thomas The meeting was called to order by Tim Clark at 4:05 p.m. 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES DATED SEPTEMBER 02, 2008 Thomas moved to approve the minutes of the September 2, 2008, Operation Committee meeting. Raplee seconded the motion, which passed 3-0. 2. APPROVAL OF VOUCHERS DATED SEPTEMBER 15, 2008 rFinance Director Bob Nachlinger presented the vouchers for September 15, 2008 for approval. Raplee moved to approve the vouchers dated September 15, 2008. Thomas seconded the motion, which passed 3-0. 3. RECOMMENDATION THAT THE COUNCIL AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO SIGN ALL NECESSARY DOCUMENTS TO PURCHASE ORACLE DATABASE MAINTENANCE SERVICE FOR PERMIT MANAGEMENT AND POLICE RECORDS SYSTEMS IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $45,000. Information Technology Manager John Humphrey's explained that The City has Permit Management (Kiva) and Police Records (Tiburon) systems that both run on Oracle databases. At the time of the purchase of those software products (a number of years ago) a certain type of licensing (referred to as Universal Processing Unit or UPU) was purchased for the Oracle database licensing. Last year we were informed by Oracle that we must purchase updated Oracle database licensing to remain in compliance with the current Oracle licensing model (referred to as Per Processor). That purchase was approved last year, and now this is the associated annual maintenance for ■ that updated Oracle database licensing. Humphreys further explained that once this maintenance plan is purchased, we will receive new versions of software as well as support and maintenance at no additional cost. Humphrey's noted the Budget Impact as follows: Operating (within current overall IT budget allocation) r - Estimate $45,000 ($41,009.31 + tax) Humphreys provided the following Operations Committee Minutes , September 16, 2008 Page: 2 , background information: 3D Edwards was purchased by PeopleSoft, and PeopleSoft was subsequently purchased by Oracle (so 3D Edwards is now an Oracle-owned system). During the licensing review by Oracle (as part of the ' 3D Edwards upgrade) it was determined that we are currently licensed under the Universal Processing Unit (UPU) license for Kiva (our Permit Management System) and Tiburon (our Police Records System) and UPU licensing is no longer sold or supported by Oracle. Our Oracle partner,representative (Mythics) provided us with a discounted quote to purchase Oracle database ' licensing that is compliant with Oracle's current licensing model (Per Processor Licensing). Humphrey noted the attached invoice which includes the annual maintenance for the updated Oracle database licensing. ' Questions were raised by the Committee which Humphreys responded to. The committee requested that they see the list of the annual contracts over $25,000 that have been previously approved. Finance Director Bob Nachlinger pointed out that the list is included in the IT budget annually when the budget is approved. The committee requested to see the list of annual contracts as part of the spring review. , Thomas moved to recommend that the Council authorize the Mayor to sign all , necessary documents to purchase Oracle database maintenance service for Permit Management and Police records Systems in .an amount not to exceed , $45,000. Raplee seconded the motion, which passed 3-0. 4. RECOMMENDATION THAT THE BONDS OPERATIONS R THE 19999 LIMITED TAX GENERAL ISSUANCE OF REFUNDING BON 16 2RAL OBLIGATION BONDS AND FORWARD THE ITEM TO THE SETEMBER , 008 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ON OTHER BUSINESS. , Finance Director Bob Nachlinger explained that in conjunction with the issuance of the $24 million LTGO Bonds, an opportunity exists to refund the outstanding 1999 LTGO bonds and achieve a present value savings of approximately $330,000. Our Bond Counsel, Preston Gates, has prepared the attached ordinance for you review. Nachlinger further explained that the budget for the debt service for the 1999 LTGO Bonds will be reduced by approximately $37,000 annually from 2009 through and including 2019. The gross savings from these transactions will be approximately $409,000 with a present value of approximately $330,000. The savings are enhanced by being able to spread the costs of issuance over the new money LTGO Bonds as well as the Refunding Bonds. Nachlinger also noted that the estimated ' gross savings by year from this refunding are presented below: Year Amount 2008 $ 61441 3 Operations Committee Minutes September 16, 2008 Page: 3 1 2009 36,365 2010 37,765 2011 37,615 2012 36,305 2013 38,775 2014 35,100 2015 33,850 2016 35,800 2017 36,950 2018 37,300 2019 36,750 Tota I $409,016 ' Questions were raised by the committee which Nachlinger,responded to. Raplee moved to recommend that the Operations Committee approve the issuance of refunding bonds for the 1999 Limited Tax General Obligation Bonds and forward the item to the September 16, 2008 City Council agenda on other business. Thomas seconded the motion, which passed 3-0. Th a ting adj rned at 4. 5 p.m. Ij a cyCay Operation ommittee acretary 1 1 PLANNING & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MINUTES AUGUST 11, 2008 ' Committee Members Chair Elizabeth Albertson, Ron Harmon, Tim Clark. Albertson called the meeting to order. Approval of Minutes Clark MOVED and Harmon SECONDED to approve the minutes of June 9, 2008. Motion PASSED 3-0. Countywide Planning Policy Amendment, Annexation Area Planning Manager Charlene Anderson explained that these are proposed amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies (CPP) approved through King County Council and the Growth Management Planning Council (GMPC). Anderson stated that these motions relate to adjusting the interim Potential Annexation Area Map, and amend policies related to annexing areas that are claimed on a Potential Annexation Area map by more than one city. Anderson stated that the policy amendments relate specifically to the North Highline area. She stated that neither the map nor the policies affect Kent. 1 Harmon MOVED to recommend to the Full Council ratification of the amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies approved under the GMPC Motions Numbers: 07-1, 07-2, 07-4, 08-1, 08-2, 08-3, and 08-4, amending the interim potential annexation area map and the Countywide Planning Policies Land Use #31 and Land Use #32. Clark SECONDED the Motion. Motion PASSED 3-0. ' #CPA-2008-3 2008 Water System Plan, Drainage Master Plan, Wellhead Protection Program Phase I & II, and Amendment of Kent Comprehensive Plan Capital Facilities Element Water System Plan Bieren stated that staff is updating the Water System Plan (WSP) as required by the Department of Health every six years. He stated that staff's analysis must be consistent with Kent's Comprehensive Plan and land use plans. He stated that Kent's water system boundary flows in and outside of the rcity's boundaries at several points; to Water District 111, Soos Creek Water and Sewer District, and Highline Water District service areas along the city's fringes. However, the majority of the city is served by Kent water. Bieren stated that in ' updating the WSP, staff evaluated Kent's existing system and its ability to serve Kent's immediate and future needs. ' In response to comments from Clark, Bieren stated that the Department of Health monitors water availability and testing for pollutants. They regulate existing agreements between water purveyors. ' PEDC Minutes August 11, 2008 Page 1 of 9 2 , Bieren stated that a number of important things are happening in the Court System associated with the Municipal Water Law that Kent will watch closely and based on recent rulings may amend the Water System Plan if necessary. Bieren stated that unlike other jurisdictions, our water supply will meet Kent's needs through 2035. He stated that pressure issues exist on East and West Hill. ' Staff would like to construct a 640 zone storage tank on East Hill to raise the water surface elevation to 640 feet above sea level from its current water level of 590 feet to provide more storage and water pressure. Water pressure issues on West Hill have been corrected over the years through a system of pumps. Bieren stated that the Guiberson Reservoir on Scenic Hill needs to be replaced due j to leaking. He stated that 12.5 million gallons of water is available to Kent through the Tacoma Second Supply Pipeline. He stated that Tacoma may opt to build a water treatment facility around 2013 or 2014 that would allow Kent to withdraw water from this pipeline year round. The cost to Kent would be approximately 40 million dollars. Bieren stated that the cost of the previously mentioned improvements, ' improvements related to the Kent East Hill Operations Center with a new testing facility, water main replacements and reservoir replacements will run about $150 to $160 million dollars. Drainage Master Plan Environmental Engineer Beth Tan stated that the Drainage Master Plan (DMP) was last updated in 1985. She stated that the city has completed a Capital Improvement Plan and acquired property through annexations. Tan stated that a lot of growth has occurred since 1985 and Kent has acquired ' more impervious area. She stated that maintenance needs have changed and flooding issues have occurred. Tan stated that staff reviewed flooding risks and considered how to reduce flooding , damage associated with Kent's streams, Mill Creek, Springbrook Creek, Garrison Creek, Meridian Valley Creek, and Soosette Creek. Tan stated that staff looked at the flooding issues within Kent's local drainage systems or pathways that exist in Kent's storage facilities, specifically the water detention structures and the two dams on Mill Creek. Tan stated that staff looked at Kent's infrastructure, future stormwater main replacement needs, habitat restoration, wetland preservation, and water quality issues. Tan stated that water quality issues includes Kent's unfunded permit (a National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Phase II permit) mandated but unfunded by the Department of Ecology's rules and regulations. She stated that staff has considered how the City will maintain records and monitor the daily load compliance within the NPDES. The second Water Quality issue is meeting compliance within a TMDL. Tan defined TMDL as a " total maximum daily load PEDC-Minutes August 11, 2008 ' Page 2 of 9 3 1 compliance" by stating the State maintains maximum daily loads for various nutrients and temperature in stream bodies. Tan stated that Kent monitors phosphorus in Lake Fenwick as a requirement of WA Department of Ecology, which will require water quality restoration improvements to reduce the total phosphorus within that lake outlet and maintain acceptable levels of phosphorus per the State's requirement standards. Tan stated that the City is mandated to comply with the maintenance requirements within the Phase II permit to avoid potential lawsuits or a fine from the Department of Ecology. Tan stated that the Washington State Department of Ecology regulates the Clean Water Act under the leadership of the Environmental Protection Agency. Tan stated that staff considered the drainage component of Kent's 6-Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and 20-Year Transportation Master Program (TMP) with respect to the storm water facilities that staff will have in place as transportation improvements are made. She stated that those improvements L include curb edge for storm water systems, water quality systems, and the acquisition of property for those storm water facilities will come from the drainage rate fund. Tan stated that staff looked at the Green River Levee repair and replacement work. She stated that the US Army Corp of Engineers in collaboration with the King County Flood Control Zone District is currently working on some projects in Kent. Tan stated that the King County Flood Control Zone District is a countywide program responsible for maintaining and repairing levees in King County. She stated that a portion of property tax is appropriated for the King County Flood Control Zone District, with a share of those funds given to each district. Some of those funds are budgeted for the repair and replacement of some of the Green River levees. ' Tan stated that staff estimates that it will cost about $200 million dollars to replace all the levees in Kent and have them FEMA certified, with $70 million dollars received from the King County Flood Control Zone District. Tan stated that Kent receives funds from the Army Corp of Engineers (ACOE) annually, but the amount varies from year to year. She stated that the ACOE often shares the cost on major projects with the King County Flood Control Zone District and Kent. tIn response to Albertson, Tan clarified that property owners in the Valley will be challenged to have their property insured if Kent's levees are not certified. Tan stated that the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is in charge of certifying the levees and the flood insurance rate maps. She stated that FEMA is in the process of looking at Kent's levee maps. They created a preliminary new map which was appealed by Kent, King County and other jurisdictions. FEMA should have a new map available for review mid 2009. PEDC-Minutes August 11, 2008 Page 3 of 9 4 Tan stated that staff is looking at incorporating Low Impact Development (LID) guidelines into the City's Surface Water Design Manual update to be completed by August 2009. Clark discussed drainage and water rate issues with staff. Tan stated that some of Kent's major projects include the Upper Mill Creek Dam improvements to increase storage along 104th Avenue, Mill Creek restoration from Smith to James, from James to Chandler Bay, and the Green River Natural Resource Area which store flood control water. Tan stated that staff discovered that they need to make outlet improvements to meet projected storage capacity within those areas. She stated that approximately 300 acre feet of storage are available at the Green River Natural Resource area site, but the outlet is not performing correctly. Tan stated that staff needs to complete some major improvements now, as the City is currently losing from 80 to 100 acre feet of storage within that facility. Tan stated that one project along the 76th Avenue Corridor, north of 228th, where there are a lot of businesses, continually experiences flooding, and has sustained road damage from all the water that ponds and seeps into the sub-grade. Tan stated that the intent of the 2281h Street project is to divert some of the water flowing into the 76th Avenue area to the Green River Natural Resource Area to off- load some of the flooding. ' Tan stated that the cost to complete the projects ranges from $120 to $220 million dollars, based on whether or not Council decides to fund the levee repair work. ' Discussion ensued with respect to grade separation, the construction for over or underpasses with respect to the rail system and how water would be diverted from those areas. Capital Facilities Element of Comprehensive Plan Tan stated that staff has looked at , the Goals and Policies contained in the Capital Facilities Element Chapter 8, and in the Land Use Element Chapter 4 of Kent's Comprehensive Plan. Staff made minor modifications to some goals and policies and moved other goals and policies from other elements of the comprehensive plan to the Capital Facilities Element related to utilities. Clark questioned whether the city was prepared to accommodate such services that , would be required to adequately accommodate the anticipated growth without degrading levels of service were the Potential Annexation Area of Panther Lake annexed. He questioned if the City was negotiating with the County with respect to services. Bieren stated that staff is working to identify existing facilities in the Panther Lake area and what it would take to build facilities to Kent's Standards. He stated that it PEDC-Minutes August 11, 2008 ' Page 4 of 9 5 is his understanding that Kent is receiving full cooperation from King County in terms of identifying existing facilities. Tan stated that staff added new Goals and Policies. Goal CF-22 identifies the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System Phase II Permit. The goals and ' policies are taken straight from this permit Kent holds with the DOE. Goal CF-23 encourages the use of low impact development in construction projects. Tan stated that Kent has approximately 425 publicly maintained storm water detention ponds. She stated that those ponds collect, detain and release at a specific rate. Tan stated that staff looked at the City's existing drainage system and buildout and then took a more conservative approach in looking at the City's full buildout per the GMA requirements, excluding low impact development. Tan stated that Kent would have to improve the drainage system for those areas of Kent with a substantial redevelopment submittal, based on Kent City Code (KCC) requirements. Tan stated that KCC requires redevelopments to follow guidelines laid out in the Surface Water Design Manual. She stated that if those guideline thresholds are exceeded the redevelopment would be required to construct detention areas and meet the water quality requirements for the redevelopment of that area. Bieren spoke about the Capital Facilities Plan Goals CF-25, 26, 27, 28 and 29. Bieren stated that the DMP, WSP and associated Comprehensive Plan Element changes are scheduled to go before the Public Works Committee on August 18th and to City Council on September 2nd for adoption. Anderson stated that the Land Use and Planning Board (LUPB) reviewed the DMP and WSP, unanimously recommending approval of the plans, as well as the changes to the Capital Facilities Element in the Comprehensive Plan. Anderson stated that the LUPB was impressed with what the Public Works Department had presented in the plans, thought the plans were comprehensive, and easy to understand. She stated that some citizens voiced their concerns with drainage and flooding along Military Road and they are in attendance at this meeting. Tan stated that staff will be going out to those sites to address these concerns and the City will be cleaning the manhole that had overflowed on a twice yearly basis. Ms. Charlie King, 26201 Military Road So, stated that she spoke before the LUPB with respect to the manhole at the top of her driveway that spewed over 240 gallons of muddy water into the basement of her home, causing over $10,000 worth the damage to her floors and eroding the fill under her driveway. King stated that neither she nor her neighbors have been contacted by City staff. PEDC-Minutes August 11, 2008 Page 5 of 9 6 King stated that rather than using the terminology "encouraging" or promote", she would support using the terminology "require" with respect to low impact development. She stated that a developer would be "required" rather than j encouraged to meet specific development conditions. Bieren stated that any new or redevelopment would be required to meet the City's drainage standards. Tan stated that Kent adopted a Storm Water Surface Manual in 2002 that includes detention and water quality requirements for any development or redevelopment. Tan stated that the Drainage Master Plan requires redevelopments to pay for their development systems and any necessary improvements to restore the water systems. She stated that after the DMP is adopted, the City can request new developments in those areas to increase their pipe size in order to maintain positive water flow. Roseanne Torgerson, 26015 Military Rd S, clarified that four neighbors attended the July 28t" LUPB meeting and three voiced their concerns. Torgerson stated that the people residing along Military Road are risking their safety by climbing into the drainage ditches to clean them out and clear the ends of the culverts to keep the water system working. Bieren stated that he believes the drainage issues along Military have been brought to the Public Works Maintenance Operations attention to look at. He encourages the public to call the City at 253.856.5600 when they notice any problem areas that need attention. Torgerson voiced her concerns with: 1) the flooded muddy bus stop on Military Road in front of her property, 2) the buildup of contaminates and debris which forms a berm, when City maintenance crews come through with their equipment to maintain the edge of the roadway, 3) the creek that has formed and runs down her driveway whenever it rains, as the result of the berm transforming her driveway into a low area 4) the turf left behind in the ditches after the maintenance crews have been through which blocks the culverts. Bieren stated that the City's maintenance crew generally places those tailings alongside those ditches that can handle them, and can continue to operate. He stated that if the ditches need to be cleaned out, City staff will pick up those tailings and take them to a site where they are tested. Bieren encouraged folks to call the city to report any localized clumps of debris clogging a culvert, so that City staff could take care of it. Bieren stated that the road bed has been improved over the years. He stated that t there are potential improvements for the future to widen that section of Military Road and improve the drainage system's capacity. Bieren stated that Torgerson's concerns would be addressed through the DMP, as there is a maintenance component that talks about increasing maintenance in areas PEDC-Minutes August 11, 2008 Page 6 of 9 7 such as Military Road. He stated that staff has budgeted for a rate increase that may help to take care of this situation. Torgerson spoke about issues with respect to fire hydrant damage, accessability, and visibility. Bieren stated that the City works with the Fire Department to resolve these types of problems. Charles Findley, 26425 Military Rd. S, stated that the V-shaped drainage ditch fronting his property at 26505 Military Rd. S. has made it difficult for him to mow his lawn. Findley stated that he would like to see this ditch filled in, replace the drainage ditch with a pipe system that runs down to I-5. Clark MOVED to approve the recommendation of the Land Use and Planning Board to amend the Capital Facilities Element of the Kent Comprehensive Plan and incorporate the 2008 Water System Plan by reference into the Kent Comprehensive Plan and adopt the same by ordinance. Harmon SECONDED the Motion. Motion PASSED 3-0. Harmon MOVED to approve the recommendation of the Land Use and Planning Board to adopt the 2008 Water System Plan by ordinance. Clark SECONDED the Motion. Motion PASSED 3-0. Clark MOVED to approve the recommendation of the Land Use and Planning Board to amend the Capital Facilities Element of the Kent Comprehensive Plan and incorporate the Drainage Master Plan by reference into the Kent Comprehensive Plan and adopt the same by ordinance. Harmon SECONDED the Motion. Motion PASSED 3-0. Harmon MOVED to approve the recommendation of the Land Use and Planning Board to adopt the Drainage Master Plan by ordinance. Clark SECONDED the Motion. Motion PASSED 3-0. #CPA-2007-4 Midway Subarea Plan Interlocal Aareement Modification Long Range Planner Gloria Gould-Wessen stated that Kent would like to amend the Midway Planning area project's interlocal agreement between the cities of Kent and Des Moines to include five parcels in the Midway planning study area which are located in the New Alaska Trailer Park off of 240tn , and in the West Hill Mobile Manor off of 260tn Gould-Wessen stated that the Midway planning project is a joint effort between the cities of Kent and Des Moines, partially funded by Washington State Department of Community Trade and Economic Development (CTED). She stated that the assembly of boundaries was defined during a joint Council Committee meeting held between the cities of Kent and Des Moines in February 2008. Those boundaries along with a mission statement, goals and a list of deliverables were tied to the CTED grant, are part of this interlocal agreement between the cities which were signed and became effective June 6, 2008. PEDC-Minutes August 11, 2008 Page 7 of 9 8 Gould-Wessen stated that the planning project has been designed through a robust public process. She stated that staff mailed an invitation to people within the analysis area informing them of the Midway project and inviting them to participate in a series of scheduled public meetings. She stated that staff formed a stakeholders groups that also held meetings for a total of four meetings held to j date. Gould-Wessen stated that staff created a website intended for public use. She ' stated that the owner of the Midway Mobile Manor found out about the Midway project through the public outreach process and requested that his property be included as part of the study area. Gould-Wessen stated that the City of Des Moines is located to the west of the Midway Mobile Manor property. She stated that this property is 5.7 acres in size, is designated as a Mobile Home Park (MHP) in Kent's Comprehensive Plan and zoning. She stated that the park has 62 spaces, of which 7 spaces house recreational vehicles. The property was incorporated into the City of Kent through the Del Mar annexation in 1997. Gould-Wessen stated that the Midway Mobile Manor property is surrounded to the east by multifamily units, Woodmont Plaza to the south, a nonconforming commercial manufacturing business next to the park with slivers of vacant land located adjacent to the park. Gould-Wessen further stated that the park is surrounded by (GC) General Commercial, (MR-M) Multifamily Medium Density; and (MRT-16) Multifamily 16 Units per Acre, with residential to the south. Gould- Wessen stated that although the vacant land parcels are small, if they were rezoned they could be aggregated to make that site useful for development. Gould-Wessen stated that it would be beneficial to include the Midway Mobile Manor property in the study area as property to the north and south of this park is commercial. The small vacant parcels adjacent to Pacific Highway could be redeveloped, so as to contribute to that commercial development. Gould-Wessen stated that there is the concern that the bulk of this property could be redeveloped and 62 affordable housing units would disappear. However, the property could remain as a Mobile Home Park. Gould-Wessen stated that both mobile home parks were initially excluded from the study based on a decision reached by the joint committee to focus attention specifically on commercial activities. Gould-Wessen stated that the New Alaska Trailer Park area actually consists of four parcels. The park contains 27 spaces with 20 spaces used for recreational vehicles. Three small vacant parcels zoned Mobile Home Park (MHP) in 1974 are located directly south of Highline Community College, off of 240th. The park is surrounded to the west by the City of Des Moines, Community Commercial (CC) and Multifamily activities. The park is surrounded to the south with single family residential, High PEDC-Minutes August 11, 2008 Page 8 of 9 9 1 Density Multifamily, Highway Commercial (HC) and General Commercial (GC) at Highline Community College. Gould-Wessen stated that both mobile home parks are located near a proposed bus rapid transit station, one at 240t" and the other at 260t". She stated that there is potential in the near future for light-rail to be voted upon and extended to the 2401" location. Both areas have the capacity to contribute to transit-oriented development. ' Gould-Wessen stated that a tool the city could apply to the planning process of our subarea planning is to provide density bonuses for developers who provide affordable housing. Gould-Wessen stated that the City also could allow some dimensional flexibility in the development, reduced parking, fee waivers, expedited review, and inclusionary requirements. She stated that the city also could sponsor government housing. Gould-Wessen stated that Kent has regulations related to conversion of these mobile home parks. If these parcels were to be redeveloped, the owner would have to provide the tenants with a relocation plan through the City prior to giving the tenants a 12-month advance notification to vacate as required by the State. Gould- Wessen stated that there are five other mobile home parks within the study area. Harmon MOVED to approve the amendment to the Interlocal Agreement between the Cities of Kent and Des Moines regarding the revised Midway Planning Project Study Area Map Boundary and authorize the Mayor to sign the Interlocal. Clark SECONDED the Motion. Motion PASSED 3-0. Chair Albertson moved discussion of the 2008 Planning Work Program to the September 8t'' meeting. Adjournment Chair Albertson adjourned the meeting at 6:45 p.m. Pamela Mottram Planning Services/PEDC Secretary IS:\Permit\Plan\PEDC\2008\Minutes\081108_PEDCmin.doc 1 1 PEDC-Minutes August 11, 2008 Page 9 of 9 KENT W-HINGTON CITY OF KENT PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES September 9, 2008 COMMITTEE MEMBERS: Les Thomas, Jamie Danielson, and Ron Harmon, Chair • The meeting was called to order by Chair Ron Harmon at 5:02 PM. • Chair noted that one action item from Police will be added as #8. • Chair called for additions or changes to the agenda, there were no additional. 1. Approval of Minutes L. Thomas moved to approve the minutes of the August 12, 2008 meeting. The motion was seconded by J. Danielson and passed 3-0. 2. Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs, Graffiti &Taggers Abatement grant award - ACCEPT and Establish Budget Chief of Police Steve Strachan introduced Public Education Specialist Sara Wood who explained how the grant funds would be used. Sara also announced the date for National Night Out 2009 is August 4, 2009. J. Danielson moved to authorize the Kent Police Department to accept the 1 grant from Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs in the amount of $7,000, and to establish the budget. 3. Washington Traffic Safety Commission "X-52:Sustained Enforcement, DUI & SSpeedina Traffic Safety Emphasis" grant - ACCEPT Chief Strachan explained the purpose of the emphasis and how funds would be used. L. Thomas moved to recommend authorizing the Kent Police Department to accept the Washington Traffic Safety Commission "X-52 Patrol" grant in an amount up to $7,000. The motion was seconded by J. Danielson and passed 3-0. i4. Washinaton Traffic Safety Commission Illegal Street Racing Emphasis grant - ACCEPT Chief Strachan explained the purpose of the emphasis and how funds would be used. J. Danielson moved to recommend that Council authorize the Kent Police Department to accept the Washington Traffic Safety Commission grant not to exceed $15,000 for illegal street racing emphasis patrols. The motion was seconded by L. Thomas and passed 3-0. S. Kent Police Towing Policies and Procedures Manual - INFO ONLY Chief Strachan explained the purpose of the manual, explained it was still in draft mode and that tow companies have given input. Chair Harmon requested that the Committee be advised when the manual is finalized. 6. Kent Drinking Driver Task Force - Early Warning System- INFO ONLY Chief Strachan and Stacy Judd spoke about the effort to build better relationships with businesses that sell alcohol, Kent's cooperation with Washington Liquor Control Board to monitor over-service, sales to underage, and the process of possibly pulling WLCB licenses of consistently non-compliant businesses. 1 7. Prevention of Auto Theft throuah Regional Operational Links (PATROL) Task Force update — INFO ONLY Chief Strachan explained the newly formed task force will be located in Des Moines and staffing will be a team effort from many of the partner agencies. He stated that Lt. Bob Holt will oversee the unit, a Kent officer will be assigned to the task force and Kent is the fiscal agent as the unit gets underway. S. Justice Assistance FY 2008 Grant award — AUTHORIZE Chief Strachan and Debra LeRoy explained the funds would be used to support substance abuse treatment and education at the City of Kent Corrections Facility. L. Thomas moved to recommend Council authorize the Kent Police Department to accept the FY 2008 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant in the amount of $24,311, and authorize the Mayor to sign the award document. The motion was seconded by J. Danielson and passed 3-0. The meeting adjourned at 5:26 PM. Jo Thompson, Public Safety Committee Secretary i 1 1 1 i Public Safety Committee Minutes 2 September 9, 2008 3 PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE MINUTES for SEPTEMBER 15, 2008 Committee Members Present: Committee Chair Deborah Ranniger and Committee Members Debbie Raplee and Ron Harmon were present. The meeting was called to order at 5:10 p.m. ITEM 1 — Approval of Minutes Dated August 18, 2008: Committee Member Raplee moved to approve the minutes of August 18, 2008. The motion was seconded by Harmon and passed 3-0. ITEM 2 — Joint Funding Agreement for the Cooperative Data-Collection Program with the U.S. Geological Survey: Environmental Engineering Manager, Mike Mactutis explained that this is an on-going program with the City of Kent and the U.S Geological Survey (USGS) for stream data collection. The City of Kent will contribute $46,610 to the annual program costs of $88,650 with the USGS providing the remainder. This contract will provide for operation, maintenance and data collection at five gages. Two are located on Mill Creek, one on Springbrook Creek and two on Rock Creek. You can look at the water monitoring level data at http://waterdata.usas.aov/nwis. jHarmon moved to recommend Council authorize the Mayor to sign the Joint Funding Agreement between the City of Kent and the US Geological Survey upon concurrence of the language therein by the City Attorney and Public Works Director, for $46,610 for the US Geological Survey to provide operation, maintenance and data collection at the Springbrook Creek, Mill Creek and Rock Creek Gaging Stations. The motion was seconded by Raplee and passed 3-0. ITEM 3 — Information Only/Mandatory Garbage Service Letter: Environmental Engineering Manager, Mike Mactutis explained that in April of 2007, 2,553 residential properties in the City of Kent were not subscribing to solid waste service. At that time staff began sending notices to all property owners about the mandatory service and the need to sign up for service. As a result of these notices, 1,340 properties signed up for service. As of July 2008, 522 properties in the City of Kent had solid waste service suspended for non-payment and or past due accounts. Staff expects to identify additional cases in the future. In August, staff began sending out letters (20 a week) notifying property owners that failure to comply with the mandatory solid waste service requirement is a violation of code and could result in a fine of up to $500. Residents are strongly encouraged to contact the City's solid waste provider to resolve past due accounts. Staff is also using this opportunity to notify residents of recycling opportunities. It was also noted that there has been an increase in residents signing up for recycling and yard waste recycling due to changes in what's allowed to be recycled. For informational Purposes Only - Notion Not Required 1 4 PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE MINUTES for SEPTEMBER 15, 2008 ITEM 4 — Update/Safe Walking Routes to School Grant: Design Engineering Manager, Mark Howlett reminded the committee that at the February 4, 2008 Public Works Committee meeting we discussed the award of two federal grants the Kent Police Department received for Safe Walking Routes to School for Daniel and Horizon Elementary Schools. The focus of the discussion was on the fact that the federal grant contributed approximately $1,000,000 towards sidewalk improvements that would ultimately cost the City roughly $11-million to construct. The Committee requested that staff search for other funding sources and ways to fund the project and report back to the Public Works Committee. To date no other funding sources have been located, and financial resources within the existing budget are not available. An LID could be formed which would generate approximately $1,700,000. Public Works staff contacted the lead grant agency (Washington State Department of Transportation Highways and Local Programs) to discuss redefining how the Safe Walking Routes to School grants can be spent. There may be the ability to construct an asphalt walking path near Daniel Elementary School, behind the drainage ditches. A similar path could be constructed near Horizon Elementary, but several areas would require significant funds to complete. If the asphalt walking path was to be done it would significantly reduce the cost of the project. This item will be brought back to committee at a later date. For informational Purposes Only — Motion Not Required Adiourned• The meeting was adjourned at 5:47 p.m. i Next Scheduled Meeting: Monday, October 6, 2008 at 5:00 p.m. Katcha Harmaning for Cheryl Viseth, Public Works Committee Secretary i l 1 t CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS A. t EXECUTIVE SESSION ACTION AFTER EXECUTIVE SESSION