HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Meeting - Council - Agenda - 08/01/2006 AGENDA
City of Kent
1 City Council Meeting
Agenda
t
I August 1 , 2006
Mayor Suzette Cooke
Deborah Ranniger, Council President
Councilmembers
Tim Clark Debbie Raplee
Ron Harmon Les Thomas
Bob O'Brien Elizabeth Watson
' KENT
WA5H INGTON
1 City Clerk's Office
KENT CITY COUNCIL AGENDAS
K E N T August 1, 2006
WASHINGTON Council Chambers
MAYOR: Suzette Cooke COUNCILMEMBERS: Deborah Ranmger, President
Tim Clark Ron Harmon Bob O'Brien
' Debbie Raplee Les Thomas Elizabeth Watson
' COUNCIL WORKSHOP CANCELLED
SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
I5:00 p.m.
1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE
2. ROLL CALL
3. CHANGES TO AGENDA
This is a special meeting Therefore, items may not be added to the agenda.
4. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
A Public Recognition
B Community Events
Employee of the Month
�._��� C�-ems 6-v✓ d� �-�--D
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS U
None
6. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Minutes of Previous Meeting—Approve
B. Payment of Bills—Approve
C. Mid-Year 2006 Budget Adjustment Ordinance—Adopt
D. Water Service Boundaries lnterlocal Agreement—Authorize
E. Bill of Sale, Copper Hill—Accept
F Bill of Sale, East Hill Village—Accept
G. Bill of Sale, Starwood—Accept
H. Bill of Sale, Starmeadow—Accept
I. Bill of Sale, 3rd Avenue Improvements—Accept
J. Bill of Sale, Kent Station, Phase I—Accept
I K. Western Arts Federation Grant—Accept and Amend Budget
L. Second Quarter Fee-in-Lieu Fees—Accept and Amend Budget
(Continued)
1
COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA CONTINUED
M. Starbucks Grant for Clark Lake Trail Development—Accept and Amend Budget
N S 228th Erosion Control Final Pay Estimate—Approve
O. Town Square Plaza Fountain Base Agreement—Authorize
' P. Proposed LID 359, 116th Avenue— Resolution Setting Hearing Date
Q. 2007-2012 Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program—Set Hearing Date
7. OTHER BUSINESS
A. �nVallley View R )
II Rezone (QUASI-JUDICIAL PROCEEDING ^ lt
J� �t
8. 8113IDS &J
' None
I 9. REPORTS FROM STANDING COMMITTEES, STAFF AND SPECIAL
COMMITTEES
10. CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS
11. EXECUTIVE SESSION AND AFTER EXECUTIVE SESSION
' A. Pending Litigation
B. Property Acquisition
12. ADJOURNMENT
tNOTE: A copy of the full agenda packet is available for perusal in the City Clerk's Office and the
Kent Library. The Agenda Summary page and complete packet are on the City of Kent
web site at www ci kent wa us
An explanation of the agenda format is given on the back of this page.
Any person requiring a disability accommodation should contact the City Clerk's Office in advance
at (253) 856-5725. For TDD relay service call the Washington Telecommunications Relay Service
at 1-800-833-6388
SUGGESTIONS • r
COMMENTSEFFECTIVE • UNCIL WELCOME HOWTO PARTICIPATE
Speaking to the Council- When you are MEETINGS The public is welcome and encouraged to Audience participation is encouraged
recognized by the Mayor or Presiding City Hall Council Chambers participate in Kent C ity Council meetings, at all Count l Meetings Citizen input is
Officer,speak directly into the microphone Workshops at 5 30 p m which are televised on local cable typic ally given cluing"Changes to the
and state your name and address for the Full Council at 7 00 p in television channel 21 (Kent TV21) Agenda,""Public Hearing,"and"Other
record,spelling your last name Business".
Purpose What is the idea you wish to ABOUT THE COUNCIL
resent? and 3" Tuesdays,January-November The citizens of Kent elec t their
p 2 Changes to the Agenda"
nd Tuesday, December
Reason. Why are you making this point? Councilrnernbers who serve on A part- When the Mayor asks for changes to the
time basis They usually have full Uric
Summary What condition will be agenda from the public,please slip to the
changed or improved if your viewpoint is Kent City I fall, 220-41h Avenue South lobs m addition to then City duties It is podium and give your name,address and
Kent,WA 98032-5895 the responvbilily of Counc dniembers to
adopted? set policies which ensure that citizens are the Sublet t of your concern You may ask
Action State what you would like the being served in a safe community to speak to any item on the agenda(for
City Council to do in response to your Business Hours "Other Business"items,see below),or
viewpoint 8 00 a of-5 00 p of COUNCIL COMMITTEES you may ask to add an agenda item The
Monday-Friday Council will determine whether or not to
Counul Committees are composed of three add your Rein to the agenda
Please limn your comments to three Councilmembers who meet regularly to best
minutes address then constituents'concerns
Most items brought be(oro the entire "Public Hearing"
Council have been chu ussed by one of Public Hearings are held to receive input
these working committees After a review on a particular issue When the Mayor
is completed,the c uninutlee makes a asks for public comment,you should
CONTACT: recommendation to the entire Council for rise or raise your hand Upon being
a vote at a subsequent Council Meeting red ognized,step to the lectern,give your
City Council Office This recommendation is voted on under name, address and state the nature of
Phone(253) 856-5712 the"Consent Calendar,"if the vote by the your interest or concern Please speak
1 E-mail citycoum il@ci kent wa us Committee was unani nous into the microphone on the lectern All
Committees and Members comments should be addressed to the
Operations: Tim Clark,Chair chair(Mayor)
Meeting agendas are available At each Mayor's Office Deborah Ranniger, Debbie Raplee
meeting The Agenda Summary page is Phone(253)856-5700 Meets I"and 3'"Tuesdays at 4 00 p m "Other Business"
also posted on the uty's internet site, Items under Other Business are generally
hill)//www a kent wa us E-mail mayor@ci kent wa us Parks and Human Services: g y
A copy of the full agenda packet is Deborah Ranniger,Chair discussed by the Council before action
Debbie Raplee, Bob O'Brien is taken If you wish to address an item
available for perusal in the City Clerk's Meets 3"'Thursday At 5 00 p rn under Other Business,you(flay do so by
Offic e and the Kent Libiary Planning and Economic Development: following the same procedure as in Public
Ron Harmon,Chair Hearings
Any person requiring a disability Tim Clark, Elizabeth Watson
accommodation should contact the Meets 3" Monday at 4 00 p m Continents are typically horned to three
City Clerks Office in advance at Public Safety. Ron I larmon,Chair minutes per speaker
(253)856-5725 For TOD relay service call Bob O'Brien,Les Thomas
the Washington Telecommunications Relay Meets 2 'Tuesday At 5 00 p In
Service at 1-800-833-6388 Public Works: Debbie Raplee,Chair
Ron Harmon,Tim Clark
KEN T
W.S.INGTOM Meets 1"and 3"d Mondays at 500 p m ad,,8696 7Ai6
iCHANGES TO THE AGENDA
Citizens wishing to address the Council will, at this time, make known the subject of
interest, so all may be properly heard.
A) FROM COUNCIL, ADMINISTRATION, OR STAFF
r
r
1 B) FROM THE PUBLIC
1
1
i
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
A) PUBLIC RECOGNITION
r
1
B) COMMUNITY EVENTS
1
r
rC) EMPLOYEE OF THE MONTH
1
r
r Uv
r
i
1
r
1
r
' CONSENT CALENDAR
6. Citv Council Actio .
Councilmember moves, Councilmember (�—
tseconds to approve Consent Cale dar Items A through Q.
Discussion // ?
Action
6A. Approval of Minutes.
1 Approval of the minutes of the regular Council meeting of July 18, 2006.
' 6B. Approval of Bills.
Approval of payment of the bills received through June 30 and paid on June 30 after
auditing by the Operations Committee on July 18, 2006.
Approval of checks issued for vouchers
Date Check Numbers Amount
6/30/06 Wire Transfers 2483-2497 $1,247,445 71
6/30/06 PrePays & Regular 595601-596248 4,383,305 86
Use Tax Payable 2 641 04
$5,633,392 61
Approval of payment of the bills received through July 15 and paid on July 15 after auditing by the
Operations Committee on July 18,2006
Approval of checks issued for vouchers.
Date Check Numbers Amount
7/15/06 Wire Transfers 2498-2513 $1,493,785 17
7/15/06 PrePays & Regular 596249-596792 2,747,521 44
Use Tax Payable 2,901 93
$4,244,208 54
Approval of checks issued for payroll for June 16 through June 30 and paid on July 5, 2006:
Date Check Numbers Amount
7/5/06 Checks 291595-291919 $ 250,531 02
7/5/06 Advices 198591-199283 1,311,013 75
$1,561,544 77
Council Agenda
Item No 6 A-B
• Kent City Council Meeting
KENT July 18, 2006
WA5 HINGTON
The regular meeting of the Kent City Council was called to order at 7.00 p.m. by Mayor Cooke.
Councilmembers present Clark, Harmon, O'Brien, Ranniger, Raplee, Thomas and Watson.
(CFN-198)
CHANGES TO THE AGENDA
B From the Public. (CFN-198) Consent Calendar Item 6K was removed by Councilmember
O'Brien.
PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
A. Public Recognition (CFN-198) Mayor Cooke thanked the Lions Club, volunteers and
participants for a wonderful Cornucopia Days event.
B Community Events (CFN-198) Mayor Cooke noted Kent Day at Emerald Downs and National
Night Out.
C. National Night Out. (CFN-122) Mayor Cooke presented a proclamation for National Night Out
to Judy Mauhl, Public Education Specialist with the Kent Police Department.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
A LID 329 —Traffic Signal at 74th Avenue South and SR 516, Final Assessment Roll,
Ordinance (Quasi-Judicial). (CFN-885) As established by Council, this date has been set for the
public hearing on the confirmation of the final assessment roll for LID 329 The City has determined
that certain properties are specially benefited by the traffic signal installed at the intersection of 74"'
Avenue South and SR 516 (Willis Street) and has proposed to proportionately assess these properties
in accord with those special benefits Because the proposed final assessment roll affects specific,
individual property owners, the Council sits in a quasi-judicial capacity as a board of equalization for
this matter. The City Attorney explained the quasi-judicial process and it was determined that there
I had been no ex-parte communication by Councilmembers Brubaker read the names of the four
property owners who sent a letter of protest. RAPLEE MOVED to have these documents accepted
for the record Harmon seconded and the motion carved
Design Engineering Manager Tim LaPorte gave a power point presentation and outlined the history
of the project LaPorte explained that the estimated amount in 2002 was $600,000 and that that was
the final cost. He also explained that the overage the City would pay is because of the ongoing
dispute with the railroad and since this has been going on since 1987, the property owners need to
have this settled.
Richard von Reeson, representing John and Audrey Hollinger, 25014 74th Avenue South, explained
that it was an arduous process but the benefits to the industrial park and the traffic flow is working
much better now than it was and thanked the government for bearing through the process and having
an improvement that helped everyone
1
Kent City Council Minutes July 18, 2006
LaPorte explained that the four letters of protest did not include proof that the special benefit they
received as a result of the signal or the increase in the property is less than the amount of the
assessment
There were no further comments from the audience and Mayor Cooke closed the hearing. RAPLEE
MOVED to adopt Ordinance No 3802 which approves and confirms the final assessment roll on
Local Improvement District 329 concerning a traffic signal at 74th Avenue South and SR 516.
Harmon seconded and the motion carried.
CONSENT CALENDAR
RANNIGER MOVED to approve Consent Calendar Items A through J. Clark seconded and the
motion earned
A. Approval of Minutes. (CFN-198) The minutes of the regular Council meeting of July 5, 2006
were approved.
B. Approval of Bills. (CFN-t04) Numbers were not available for approval.
C. Purchase of Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus. (CFN-122) The Mayor was authorized to
sign an agreement for the purchase of self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) in the amount of
$645,738.
D. U.S. Department of Education Grant. (CFN-122) The Mayor was authorized to sign a grant
agreement with the U.S. Department of Education in the amount of$78,227.
E. Washington Traffic Safety Commission Grant. (CFN-122) The Mayor was authorized to sign
a grant agreement with the Washington Traffic Commission (WTSC) in the amount of$7,500 to
purchase school zone flashing beacons/lighting to be used in marked elementary school zones.
F. August 1, 2006 Council Meeting Time Change—National Night Out. (CFN-198) The time
change for the August 1, 2006, City Council meeting from 7 00 p in. to 5:00 p in was authorized
and the City Clerk was directed to give notice of the time change in the same manner as a special
meeting. National Night Out is an annual event and every year, the police department, City Council,
and other City representatives take this opportunity to thank the citizens who make this neighborhood
crime prevention program work
G Bill of Sale, 100th Avenue Sewer Extension. (CFN-484) The Bill of Sale for the 100`h Ave SE
Sewer Extension for one sanitary sewer manhole and 367 linear feet of sewer was accepted This
project is located at 20846 - 100th Ave SE was accepted.
H. Bill of Sale, F & R Country Estates. (CFN-484) The Bill of Sale for F&R Country Estates for
269 linear feet of streets, one storm manhole, two catch basins, and 93 linear feet of storm sewer was
accepted This project is located at 12800 SE 261"P1
1. Bill of Sale, Selbourne Lane. (CFN-484) The Bill of Sale for Selbourne Lane for one gate
valve, two watermam hydrants, 592 linear feet of watermam, 6 sanitary sewer manholes and 601
linear feet of sewer was accepted This project is located at 25833 - 116th Ave SE.
2
� Kent City Council Minutes July 18, 2006
J. Traffic Safety School Fee Increase. (CFN-122) The Drinking Driver Task Force's fee increase
for the Traffic Safety School to $60 per participant, effective September 1, 2006, was approved and
the City's budget amended accordingly
OTHER BUSINESS
A. Lake Meridian Outlet Project Cooperation Agreement. (CFN-1038) Environmental
Engineering Supervisor Mike Mactutis gave a presentation of the project and described the project
cooperation agreement. RAPLEE MOVED to authorize the Mayor to sign the Project Cooperation
agreement between the City and the US Army Corps of Engineers for the Lake Meridian Outlet
Project upon concurrence of its terms and conditions by the City Attorney and the Public Works
Director Clark seconded In response to Hodgson's question, Mactutis explained the time
constraints associated with the fish windows that begin in August and the rainy season that begins
in October. Motion carried.
ADDED
B ConLyressional/Le2islative Support Contract. (CFN-198) The proposed contract with
Thompson Smitch Consulting Group for $70,000 would provide the City with assistance to secure
the FY07 Energy and Water appropriation request, upon concurrence of its terms and conditions by
the City Attorney and the Public Works Director.
Councilmember O'Brien questioned why the contract was needed and the amount being paid to the
consulting group. Larry Blanchard,Public Works Director, noted that this consulting group would
keep track of grant funding opportunities Mactutis explained that this contract is in support of the
Green-Duwamish Ecosystem Restoration project which is 45 projects He also explained that due to
the City's foresight in the past, other projects are being prepared which are now in the design phase
and the City is in a position to take advantage of these grants as they become available. Mactutis
explained that it is a very complicated process working through the Federal/Congressional budgets
and Mr. Thompson and his firm have consulted with the City for last two years and have been
successful securing funding for the Green-Duwamish Water Shed. In answer to Councilmember
O'Brien's question, Mactutis explained the cost of the contract and the cost of the grants secured
RAPLEE MOVED to authorize the Mayor to sign the contract, upon concurrence of language therein
by the City Attorney and the Public Works Director, with Thompson Smitch Consulting Group for
$70,000 to provide the City of Kent assistance to secure the FY 07 Energy and Water appropriation
request. Harmon seconded and the motion carried with O'Brien opposed.
REPORTS
C. Parks and Human Services Committee. (CFN-198) Ranniger stated that the Parks Committee
will meet this Thursday, July 20 at 5 00 p.m.
D. Planning and Economic Development Committee. (CFN-198) Harmon reported that the
meeting was held Monday, July 17th and that the commercial truck issue will be going to Council on
August 15th with two motions.
F. Public Safety Committee. (CFN-198) Harmon reported that Fire Marshal Jon Napier gave a
report on the 4th of July demonstrations and illegal fireworks.
G. Public Works Committee. (CFN-198) Raplee stated that the next Public Works meeting will.be
Monday, August 7th at 5 00 p m.
3
Kent City Council Minutes July 18, 2006
H Administrative Reports. (CFN-198) CAO Hodgson stated that the August 1st meeting is a
special meeting which will be held at 5 00 p.m so that Councilmembers will be able to celebrate
National Night Out and there will not be a workshop that evening Hodgson announced that the Red
Barn is no longer owned by the City, the market building was sold last week.
Hodgson then reminded Councilmembers of an Executive Session of approximately 20 minutes to
discuss property acquisition, on which action may be taken when the regular meeting reconvenes, and
pending litigation which will have no action
EXECUTIVE SESSION
The meeting recessed to Executive Session at 8:17 p.m and reconvened at 8 30 p in (CFN-198)
Property Acquisition. (CFN-239) RANNIGER MOVED to approve the purchase and sale
agreement for the Schmidt Trust property located at 218 Naden Avenue, as part of the Naden St.
Assemblage, to authorize the Mayor to executive any and all documents necessary to close the land
transaction upon review and approval by the City Attorney, and to appropriate closing costs from the
Park Land Acquisition account. Raplee seconded and the motion carried.
CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS
Event Center. (CFN-1305) Councilmember Watson asked for an update on the Kent Event Center
progress. Hodgson reported that the City received a draft feasibility study that demonstrated what the
City of Kent looks like in a market with a facility this size with a junior hockey team as an anchor
tenant. He also reported a real positive that more families live in Kent than most of the other
markets, the population is smaller but the draw of these event centers is really family oriented.
Hodgson noted that the City is proceeding with the major phase of the project which is to do a full
pro forma feasibility study, in addition, there will be an economic impact study and also an
evaluation of potential conference convention piece element to the project. Staff expects to review
this with the citizen's committee and have a report at the August 15th Council meeting
Special Council Meeting. (CFN-198) Ranniger noted that this Friday Council is having a special
council meeting and will be going up to Vancouver, British Columbia, to look at three aquatic
facilities that are contemporary and include a number of different features. Council is doing this in
an effort to understand modern aquatic facilities.
ADJOURNMENT
At 8:36 p.m., WATSON MOVED to adjourn Thomas seconded and the motion carried.
Mary Simmons
Deputy City Clerk
4
Kent City Council Meeting
Date August 1, 2006
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: MID-YEAR 2006 BUDGET ADJUSTMENT ORDINANCE —
ADOPT
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Adoption of Ordinance No for budget
adjustments made between January 1, 2006, and June 30, 2006, totaling $24,542,430.
This ordinance is primarily a housekeeping adjustment, consolidating individual budget
items into one adjusting ordinance. Of the total amount, a net amount of$402,617 has
not yet been approved by Council, primarily authorizing expenditure of designated
revenues already received.
1 3. EXHIBITS: Memo from Finance Director and ordinance
4. RECOMMENDED BY: Operations Committee
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. FISCAL IMPACT
Expenditure? _ Revenue? _
Currently in the Budget? Yes X No X
If no:
Unbudgeted Expense: Fund Various Amount $402,617
Unbudgeted Revenue: Fund Various Amount $402,617
6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION-
Council Agenda
Item No. 6C
t
FINANCE
R J. Nachlinger, Director
• Phone.253-856-5260
K E N T Fax 253-856-6255
W A S M I N O T O N Address 220 Fourth Avenue S
Kent,WA 98432-5895
DATE: July 18,2006
1 TO: Kent City Council Operations Co
FROM: R. J. Nachlinger, Finance Director
THROUGH: John H odgson, Chief Administrative Officer
SUBJECT: Consolidating Budget Adjustment Ordinance for Adjustments Between
January 1, 2006 and June 30, 2006
MOTION:I move to recommend Council approve the consolidating budget adjustment
ordinance for adjustments made between January 1, 2006 and June 30, 2006 totaling
$249542,430.
SUMMARY: Authorization is requested to approve the technical gross budget adjustment
ordinance totaling$24,542,430 for budget adjustments made between January 1, 2006 and
June 30, 2006. The net amount, excluding transfers and internal service charges, is$12,628,491.
Please note that $24,139,813 was previously approved by Council. These were primarily for
projects.
BUDGETIMPACT:
BACKGROUND: Of the net amount of$402,617 not yet approved by Council, $390,272 is for
the allocation of dedicated revenues and settlements and authorizing expenditures, $75,196
represents a technical correction of cost allocations and closing of projects, ($84,488) is a
reduction in the confidential fund per department request, and$21,637 is a correction of the Fire
Physical Fitness fund per contract terms.
Authorized position totaling 1.00 is increased by:
■ 1.0 for Administration for a permanent full-time Neighborhoods Program Manager for
the Neighborhoods Program.
Kent Council Operations Committee Consolidating Budget Adjustment
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the city council of the city of
Kent, Washington, amending the 2006 budget for
adjustments made from January 1, 2006, to June 30,
2006.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES
' HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1 - Budget Adjustment. The 2006 city budget is amended to
include budget fund adjustments as summarized and set forth in Exhibit"A,"which is
attached and incorporated by this reference. Authorized positions are increased by
1.00 full-time equivalent.
SECTION 2. - Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to
the effective date of this resolution is hereby ratified and affirmed.
SECTION 3. - Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this
ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent
jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or
constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this ordinance.
I
i
i
1 2006 First Half Budget Adjustments
SECTION 4. - Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force
five (5) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law.
SUZETTE COOKE, MAYOR
ATTEST:
BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
TOM BRUBAKER, CITY ATTORNEY
PASSED: day of August, 2006.
APPROVED: day of August, 2006.
PUBLISHED: day of August, 2006.
I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No. pal
by the city council of the city of Kent, Washington, and approved by the mayor of the
city of Kent as hereon indicated.
(SEAL) '
BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK
2 2006 First Half Budget Adjustments
i
I City of Kent
Budget Adjustment Ordinance
Adjustments January 1, 2006 to June 30, 2006
Exhibit A
Adjustment
IFund Title Ordinance
001 General Fund 58,427
110 Street Fund 211,860
150 Capital Improvement Fund 35,000
160 Criminal Justice Fund (8,468)
190 Other Operating Projects Fund 233,403
220 Non-Voted Debt Service Fund (140,000)
I310 Street Capital Projects Fund (526,846)
■ 320 Parks Capital Projects Fund 12,048,251
330 Other Capital Projects Fund 12,000,869
350 Facilities Capital Projects 195,567
410 Water Operating Fund 292,760
440 Sewerage Operating 105,568
480 Golf Operating (119,946)
510 Fleet Services Fund 37,242
520 Central Services Fund 1
540 Facilities Management Fund 118,742
1 Total Gross Budget Change 24,542,430
' Less:
Internal Service Funds 0
Other Transfers (11,931,735)
Internal Transfers 17,796
Subtotal (11,913,939)
Total Net Budget Change 12,628,491
1
j
1
y o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
m �
IL
IL
o 00 0 0 $ o rl � � 0
O cm N 1 Cl)
N
w
co
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0
m
O O O co CO O N N CDcm e- r
O T� Lf) 7
If r ti & 00
N tf
v
O
Q O O O M 00 N N 0 r to
LN o $ o r. o to v m cow � a c co � P.: o Sri ao
w .= r
N r 10 e r
C.
N
o o v o 0 0 cc
0 o a
s o
N
N N
E
0
3
o u. m o
Cn . CN$ S L Cl)
cc qhL.� M .O N CD .O N
C3cc
w w
d
C O 0
C o
mIFS C ... pO O y - L..
LC
VdNNC N L
U W cm U 0 O C OU N O coo UO CO`
COD ' . o ' m. . a
•� v n a. y � r
i19 CII)' n
-o
� Nov c a aQ0� O c 0) o Us
I�-
C > o ? y o d m a o U U Q U
'ice �Cp O` > O rn m
p0 - 0 U j Q j A V N U fA 7.
EL
7
C Co N >N 41 N 7 O 'O 7 O
lz ?'+ Y n ct > w W O Q U .0 Q O U '
ii LO 1 i
> O 0. 0 0 0 0 Q' O Oo o a' O
Q O Q O O O O O S O O.CL O O
Z r v- ¢ Ir Z r
cm o
N
N
cc
w� e-
b C j
b LL. LL R
W
Or o
r r U
n
o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 5
� N
m -a
9= o 0 0 0 0 o co ao 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
� a
v v
co 0
iO0 0 O O O O O 0 0 0 O O 0 0 O
m
i
O O O O O O co co O O O O O O O O
1 co03
I O O co 03
O O O co co O (D h r) O O O
m o 0 to Cl) g o g o
as CD0 0 ti O m O O
ui ui ai v a0 0 o ri
CM M CI I- aO ' b I N Cl) N N 7
Npp N .pp�
O 0 0 O G O G O O (O 3 0 0 O
t0 N O T- O M O b C
1 Cl) CO) h h O N M N N It
N N s r
W p
i � o rz
L 7 C CV 0 � c� LL ti
7 +� 01
CL a v y « 0 0rn y z v
` C 0) C C s = z
C .7- E U'. w 0. .ti fp
s m > t r c s a
` 00 — tppp a O C — 3 O 9 a ff O LL ❑
O LL O O O (9 u O m 7 .� a O > m
l�6 O C O m C C d m C U O
7 LL 01 U 7 7 0) C ✓ N 7 �' Qf 9 C
•C -O O U U rOd a N U c •� ` t`d CO O O '[] df r y m C
O M 0 j ~ d U U L V O 2 V C 0 O O z
U a
a o w a a a -0
m Q o a ° o __ a, 0) 0 5 Q m >m m o c c Q o
:r d ro ` -> W 3 Tp'
W
° N0.
mRME o CU LL a m c o w
cc a U U amw . 0) ac2a0o
> A o La w R a
A N O 7 Q N 3 01 m m O
Q .O O LLI o o W W cc y
G > > : 2 M d O NC
C > O 00. 0 O O. 0 C co MZ O D. rQ z `° ¢ ¢ N
LL a z Q z 2 2 T z u N1�
it
i
LL a
> u a r
O 0 7
CL
E a a d m
7i D_
L C C O yC O w
O 01 LL >
a E o
t (9 t
rn
m o_
1=i r Z r J IL N
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P,
� o
CO w
00 m
a
1= 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
W
.a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
a
CO O U) CO O) O N W O CO 10
m co O O) r (p M 0) I- h O �
VJ I- O 0 0 1- CD O 01 Q. o7 co
C )O N to CO CO Cl) N O h W
d N M N N W N � v N
N O N W) t
�Cpp pp 1
I� O CO LO � co O (Mw 00 oco
N L!) CO 17 oc M N O r17 C
N F) LO OO N LO N
m �
0 1=i 01 00)) 0) 0) O1 (3) 0
ea
` v a 6- 0- a a o a a 00 )?
p, y N W W W i1J W O W W N
4 - fh V (I) w U) N fn N (3 (n m .U)
C G O
O
d b
O
O Q O'
'V T to to w N 0 7 N M j �01
C o O o o O U o o 5
3 N
O p ° 5 0 m > > O 5 � `°
V a a n -2 n n $ a s $
rn c s
a - Cc: o 0 o o o o I-O
y C U U U U U U U
•ee Q07 = o 0 0 0 o m o o
N D
W M m U m m m io io m m
Q a _w v
lz
5 v ¢
7 W > O m c) O O o) Cl) m �'
C O M `O O O M O O O O N N O 9 (O
0 a 0 o O o 0 0 o O
LL N C. N ) O) W s O W
9 a x ¢ Q� W X of X X ofO� = § I
d
.� N
O r g N
0. u) o O.p J O
W 0-
92 U m K 3 0 m
•�� V > C Y Y C N N � C
cn x LM C w 0 0 N � L O 61
A W C7 M cli
4
C] O N
V) 4 fn Y lV J J N 2
I
v O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 6
a
m
a
0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O O o 0 0 0 0 0
W
.� O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C. O O O O O O O O O O
6�
a'Yt
i
Go O O O Cl O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Cl O O O O
w
t0 O O O O N O O O 0 0 0 0 0 rl 00 0 O O 00 r h M r 0
m r
N U) 0O O wN CO N O O Ov p OO
CN 0 t` O O 0 M N N O O O O O N W) M t N m COO L0 N
® r O 1- 6 LO OCT m CO O O O 47 L[') O � O_ N N W
G N O r O M T r ^ r r L0 1,0
6 M N LOto c, N
� tt{O•� tpO p �p p 8 8 8 p 1(0pCO
to
r
N CO 1� O O �O m 0 ti S O O O O N t0 m �0 < r t- N 0 N 0 N
rl O 1-7 O tO O m CO 0 0 0 tO tO O V r O N N (A W
N Q r O O M r r ^ r r t0 tO O
uM N CO N
T
m QC
7 co <0 copp p NOppco LO CD to ED
p OO OO O D O O OON C
O N N M N N N N N M M N N N M N N N LO tO tO o CO 3
L N CD CD N N N QI n f` V r m M 0 O O O O 0 LL
16 ® e- O O N Q O O O 0
O T N N O O N O O r O O O O
r LO (0 r w LO LO t0 r r N C`) It r CO CO T N N N Cl N
` m
o O
IL
a u Ti a a C c a to
Y a w Y L6 0 a ` W O t2.
d c c 41) U
d D o a c Y a a 3 E a a
2
3 J w — 0 0 w0 O U J w J �>
3 C W V V 7 W W LL C a1 w (D C .0
V a> a a� a v W Y a c J y 3
•p J E 0 �' '� 0 0 0 'C Y W o - 0 d a a. O F p
LL C m Y C LL m LO E Co 0 >
a' doy �oW N Nm d Wp m wac
nC
U
L c c C m2 w
O d O O m OV O O lu
C a� O CD n _u°a O EE SO U O O Q O O
L JLL N U
F-
V N N Y 0 O N 2 Li -v O (n O 03 0) O Q
I
3 M M V V 7 n M N LO LO m V M O M LO tO • O V It 0 N
M M V LO O O r O O N N N v V �OC 0 O O O O O O O O 0 O O O 0 rO
O O O O O O +. SO O O OO 0
Nt-
C. 0 0 O O 0
LL a a a d d d aN d a a d d d a d d d d d z d a a a ON.. d a
CM
� G N
0`_ cli
a0 .�
_ ca
a W
}3 4) agp
7 y O O V cc
> m T
IL Y L Y C N N N 0 m V
W m m m Li $ vY `m 0: 9 Q o m '� ym
Y J J CO m CO of L m E- m m m m A 0. C
a G C � "• g � O Ot Ll (1 N Y N r � IL U U '� �_ � tlm Q.
LL Li UNN U U m Z = Q m v m y u W U U X X
y y u u c Y = 2 LL .� Ii u = 2 LL d
i M b y C [A Z Z m N b L
co a a m fn N 6 U' F-- w w H Li U ¢ w a a FL- Cn w w w J
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O p
WLO
M
m �
a
9L.. O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
W
C O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 O
C1
C7
c C7 O O O O 0 0 a 0 O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 O 01
cc
G'
J=
Q.�
O O of O N O O N COp O 0 N m a O M O
p S 000 a0 00 b M , O co cb �fl T Oi O t0
6f o G N 0) ? te
xa
y.i N N
r e-
47 O co m qpo r� O r0 N co O N ��jj N M r O r, n
OS m to O ti 't r r O to �[1 W m v O co co
® O a0 a0 `—' O Cl r W co (D O V O cn to
O O N OOi O W Ld
o.
C o o
N N
� C
CC
L7 {L LO
o v
O OS OSSSN LL O O
r N 1�/ .O N N N N N N N N N N D)
v C O
4
L. L
Qr y
4 � Q 0 I .F
L p� O M MU
Y U W O CO V N (fl Go f6 O W
ca C O f6 E W E N
LL m N
7 L $ 7 LL N l0 m ca LL , Z
N d >. N O a) E L - m C
>. O Q CD u
O C a, O U U d N N p U J U U ,U E .N. LL
-0 J37 3 :) M.- 3 7 7 7
o m C c d an a a C � C � LL a a a a o E
n m C F _ a > r o 'm >P N C in A H Nch
m F
p L O 0 x Q o o a y -b 0-o O n a a a 0 o >
i c7 a U 3 LU a N m N o C
Q a: m o a73 m LL w m m LL w a
Q >, U > o 0 6 ca S m � o 0 0 0 o m
CL
10 0 o `C 7 t m m ° c c '`C /b6 f0 v) o c
� No � .a r o w cn to Q ar 4 d � � a) m � cn Q
> to
N
Cl)m 2 C4 > m r , r- n o LO m co IT co N M N
'Q O N O r C r I r r N " N N m M IV V' LO
C ' O C CD O Q. 0 0 0 O O O O O 0 0 0 0 a
>
3 O .+ O N O. G'1 ++ O O O O O O O O O O O O O
LL L N O N V Cl. N O N N N N N N N N N N N N N
Q z y Q U. Z LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL U. LL LL m
u o
N
CL, .(3 m w v o o c
m m e ro m E ° c
�+ U o t m m O Y m O
67 �j tS m a`ni OL m d ac3nca
E o. EL
w m LL
O NaC.0 Y
Ee— o c
_c a a
ca m b w U U > > K r c LL m c m
o u0i c L c m ro r
W M J O m LL 4J VJ LE li U. li a If U U C1 J W
I
v o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0
i cc
IL
Ckm
s 0 O
0 0 CO (DD O O O O O a O 00 v v
ma O cO LO 10 O O O N N
iNfJ M co M c09 N N V) N M
S 0 0 0 0 O O O O O 0 0 O O O O O
m
O O O O O) a) O <- O O O O O N N
I S o� aD U) i0 O O O N N
cr) co M cli O N N M N M
v opf pp � � r r � i
I O 1LO v O 0m ff^pp 0 ��p 0 O to It Op va
O CD co O m 1� O V) fA O C) O N N
N 00 [O N t- N O In O O Of N N t.
1n In CD 10 cal W h ce) O N r M M
N r r r
O `O It8 O m tIp� O � O O O O O
co tj w O O
® IOA 00) N G O^ n
� N
CO R
O W
me O O a
iW 0)) Q O
n N N 9 v N .O V N
G C C 0i C C •p
P LL G 3 G
�. o r > >
O� ltl �
a) G a d) O O LL
L L y
O )c)CD 0 — � O _ 0 O 1 r a7 O
O N Na a O O O � O N
N co
N N G O W ; m N ' O 0G
c + �T O c O C O N > to O
E E o o 4 Q U g
c «y
as
o aCL o U U p a 3_ n _N > j a o U N-0 Mc10i FL
c ci U >
O O O O O O Q ~O 3 N iO° p
C3 o
` W W It ao c
c "U Z 2 0 c a
p o 0 0 0 c q b c m d b LL e CL
U
CL T w a CL N T Id t
ae a 'C o d t 3 o a :3 o 0) o
n 0 U M 0 O O F- .O n� O U
> Cco S v o > CO d) > >
O p O O O a a ° O S O` r a O 0 CL p
L O N N N "' Cl a O « $ a $ O « p a o $
V 4 v z v Q O z0 4 v v Z LL Q 0 z Lc) ro
tm
Ly �Gp C N
O) O i LL N
m '0 N T
0 C Q d
Apr 4 U 0 0 rn
o o m u N N 0 v
y
N a 00i aDi
-con
a [� LL
re
n n
9m m O U
O c a O G p
W v °� a c0
7 i
Cl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
n
m
m m
m
0.
W r W O O O O 0) O O N
7 C- co
N N r
O O O O O O O O O O 0
r r O O O 0 0 0/ O O N
Q
p V V OOf
N N
CA
O O �0co M
in7 R N O A
CV O O c7 (0 OD N
N N 0) r st
r Y1
N
Cl o O N O VD � O O co
Oct r O c'f
m N 0 co co
V3
OC �
v
N
m �
O 1=L.
Go V
p O O
p��j O O O O cy
q L'a� C .O Z Z N N'C 7 m
E 6
Ci LL 7
OI LL
m m Cc 0
V53 to
O n Co C
d Q — O OJ -• m
c R > > c m E 0 M c U
m m O E D d — O
U 4 c s L U E'o o U o
T O O .V-. T w Y7 O LL
c� U m m a m m U a o
o ° a E E o -0
> a 0 S o o > y Q a r o ¢ D
F- m N F-
C o n aD 0 a a'�'a m o a o
Ga. V m -o 'O O. 0 m rG N CL V
9 a Ti m m m 0 0 m
�. m U s A �. m o �. y
a m u q o o) d m
F o U 5 E 0 Q m W FF- o U
w > Un a0i un u> to a
CL c 0 0 r O0p
O N ci CL 'T O O OO O Oo C O
.O Z t0 ... Q cn LL Z LL LL It Z CD
c m a $
3 0 N
LL m N
R c LL a-
V O � 81
it
O
NLnm
p o u o
N C N C G
dk
m •�
ova U LL 4 m LL U
J
Ii N N IL 40 m 0 40
Kent City Council Meeting
Date August 1, 2006
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: WATER SERVICE BOUNDARIES INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT—
AUTHORIZE
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Authorization for the Mayor to sign the interlocal
agreement between Kent, Auburn, and Water District 111, which will allow Kent to
provide water service to the Verdana development which is to be built on the former
"Impoundment Reservoir Property" previously owned by and previously annexed to the
City of Kent, although within the potential water service areas of Auburn and Water
District 111.
3. EXHIBITS: Interlocal agreement
4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. FISCAL IMPACT
Expenditure? None Revenue? Yes
Currently in the Budget? Yes No X
If no:
Unbudgeted Expense: Fund Amount S
Unbudgeted Revenue: Fund water enterprise funds Amount est. $1,003,600 SDC's
6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
i
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No 6D
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Larry R. Blanchard, Public Works Director
KEMT• Phone 253-856- 500
WASHINGTON Fax 253-856-6500
Address 220 Fourth Avenue S
Kent,WA 98032-5895
Date: July 17tt', 2006
To: Chair Debbie Raplee and Public Works Committee Members
PW Committee Meeting Date: July 17, 2006
From: Brad Lake, Water Superintendent , �a
Through. Larry Blanchard, Public Works Director L../o
Subject: City of Kent, KC WD l I 1 & City of Auburn Iterloeal Agreement
Establishing Water Service Boundaries
Motion: ■ Required ❑ Not Required ❑ For Information Only
Authorize the Mayor to sign the interlocal agreement granting the Kent Water Division
authority to provide water service to the water system for the Verdana project at 124i", Ave.
S.E. between SE 2881n and SE 304th Street.
Will document be required?
❑ Ordinance ❑ Resolution ■ Agreement ❑ Contract
❑ Policy ❑ SOP's ❑ Other
Governing Policies Procedures Rules & Regulations:
Background/Historv: Kent Public Works was directed by the City Council to sell the Kent
Water Division "impoundment property" as a condition of acquiring 25% of the Seattle share of
the Second Supply Project. Kent has agreed to provide the water supply for the development
which is now planned to be constructed on the site, as it is presently annexed to Kent, although
within the service areas of Auburn and WD ]11. The attached interlocal agreement is the process
necessary to authorize the three parties (Auburn, Water District 111, and Kent) to proceed with
that action.
Summary: Authorization to enter into an interlocal agreement that will allow Kent water to
supply the proposed Verdana development which is to be located on the former "Impoundment"
site.
Recommendations: Authorize the Mayor to sign the interlocal agreement that will grant the
Kent Water Division the authority to provide water service to the water system for the Verdana
project at 1241h Ave. S.E between SE 288`" and SE 304th Street.
C nod SefturgIl,aeJALacn1 SelrsugslTcmlwrm,lrrrvron FV,stOl 10RIAror 4ldnenr HD111 a. onaa4etim Page.dae
r
CITY OF KENT, KING COUNTY WATER DISTRICT NO. 111
and CITY OF AUBURN
j INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT ESTABLISHING
WATER SERVICE BOUNDARIES
THIS AGREEMENT ("Agreement'), made and entered into this day of
I , 2006, by and between the City of Kent, a Washington municipal
corporation ( "Kent"), King County Water District No. 111, a Washington municipal
corporation ( "WD #111"), and the CITY OF AUBURN, a Washington municipal
corporation, ( "Auburn"), all being duly organized and existing under and by virtue of
the laws of the State of Washington (individually a "Party" and collectively the
`Parties).
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 35.A.11.040, Auburn has the legal authority to
exercise its powers and perform any of its functions as set forth in RCW 39.34; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 39.34 RCW, the Interlocal Cooperation Act,
Auburn has the legal authority to cooperate with other localities and utilities on the
basis of mutual advantage and the efficient provision of municipal services; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 39.34 RCW, the Interlocal Cooperation Act,
Kent has the legal authority to cooperate with other localities and utilities on the basis
of mutual advantage and the efficient provision of municipal services; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 39.34 RCW, the Interlocal Cooperation Act,
WD #111 has the legal authority to cooperate with other localities and utilities on the
basis of mutual advantage and the efficient provision of municipal services; and
WHEREAS, the parties recognize the responsibility of public water utilities to
provide efficient and reliable service to their customers at reasonable cost; and
WHEREAS, Kent owns, and desires to be the water service provider for a
property currently within the corporate limits of Kent, and within the service areas of
Auburn and WD #111; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 70116 RCW, Public Water System
Coordination Act, the Parties determined and agreed upon the water service areas
Ibetween the Parties as set forth in the South King County Coordinated Water System
Auburn Resolution No 3920
Kent,WD 9111 and Auburn Interlocal Agreement
Establistung Water Sennce Boundaries '
Page 1 of 9
r
Plan ("Plan") and the Parties now desire to modify their water service area
boundaries as agreed in this Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms and conditions set forth
herein, the Parties agree as follows:
1. Water Service Area. WD #111 and Auburn agree to relinquish to Kent the water
service area depicted on the map attached hereto as Attachment 1 and legally
described in Attachment 2, which are by this reference incorporated herein. The
Parties agree that the South King County Coordinated Water System Plan and the
water service area boundaries as set forth in the Plan shall be modified to be In
accordance with the Parties' water service area boundaries as set forth in Attachment
1.
2. Management, Regulation and Control of Water System. Kent, WD #111 and
Auburn shall have the sole responsibility and authority to construct, maintain,
manage, conduct and operate their water systems within their designated water
service areas as depicted in Attachment 1, together with any additions, extensions
and betterments thereto.
3. Future Annexations. The Parties agree that Kent shall provide water service to
the area depicted in Attachment 1 without regard to the present corporate boundaries
of the Parties and without regard to future corporate boundaries as they may be
periodically altered through annexation.
4. Kent Comprehensive Water Planning. The terms of this Agreement will be
included as an amendment to Kent's Comprehensive Water System Plan. Kent will
submit to Auburn and WD #111 its Comprehensive Water System Plans and
amendments thereto.
5. WD #111 Comprehensive Water Planning. The terms of this Agreement will be
included as an amendment to WD #111's Comprehensive Water Plan. WD #111 will
submit to Kent and Auburn its Comprehensive Water System Plans and amendments
thereto.
6. Auburn Comprehensive Water Planning. The terms of this Agreement will be
included as an amendment to Auburn's Comprehensive Water Plan. Auburn will
submit to Kent and WD #111 its Comprehensive Water System Plans and
amendments thereto.
7. Reliance. Each Party hereto acknowledges that the terms hereof will be relied '
upon by the other in its comprehensive planning to meet the needs of the service
area designated herein.
Auburn Resolution No 3920
Kent,WD#111 and Auburn Interlocal Agreement
Establishing Water Service Boundaries
Page 2 of 9
j8. Liability. Except as set forth in Section 12 regarding default, failure to perform
or negligent conduct, the Parties agree that this Agreement shall not be a source of
liability between the Parties for any failure or interruption of service in the service
area of any Party as designated in this Agreement.
9. Government Notifications. Auburn will give notice of the adoption of this
Agreement to Metropolitan/King County, to the Washington State Department of
Health, to the South King County Regional Water Association, to the Water Utility
Coordinating Committee, and to any other agency with jurisdiction over, or interest in,
the terms hereof, and the Parties shall cooperate and assist each other in all
reasonable manner in procuring any necessary approvals hereof by those agencies.
j 10. Boundary Review Board. In the event that implementation of the terms herein
result in permanent water service to areas that will be outside the respective service
boundaries of Kent, WD #111 or Auburn, the Parties will, at the time of such service,
jointly file a notice of intention with the King County Boundary Review Board in
accordance with Chapter 36 93.090 RCW and Chapter 57.08.047 RCW.
11. Alteration, Amendment or Modification. Kent, WD #111 and Auburn hereby
reserve the right to alter, amend or modify the terms and conditions of this
Agreement only upon written agreement of the Parties to such alteration, amendment
or modification.
12. Indemnification and Hold Harmless. Each Party hereto agrees to protect,
defend, and indemnify the other Parties, their officers, officials, employees and
agents from any and all cost, claims, judgments and/or awards of damages, arising
out of or in any way resulting from the indemnifying Party's, its employees,
subcontractors or agents default, failure of performance, or negligent conduct
associated with this agreement. Each Party agrees that its obligations under this
provision extend to any claim, demand, and(or cause of action brought by or on
behalf of any of its employees, or agents. The foregoing indemnity is specifically and
j expressly intended to constitute a waiver of each Party's immunity under
Washington's Industrial Insurance Act, RCW Title 51, as respects the other Parties
only, and only to the extent necessary to provide each Party with a full and complete
1 indemnity of claims made by the other Party's employees. The Parties acknowledge
that these provisions were specifically negotiated and agreed upon by them.
13. Integration. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement of the Parties
regarding the subject matter hereof, and there are no other representations or oral
agreements other than those listed herein, which vary the terms of this Agreement.
Future agreements may occur between the Parties to transfer additional or future
service areas by mutual agreement.
Aubum Resolution No 3920
Kent,WD#111 and Auburn Interlocal Agreement
Establishing Water Service Boundaries
Page 3 of 9
r�
t
14. Obligation Intact. Nothing herein shall be construed to alter the rights,
responsibilities, liabilities, or obligations of Kent, -WD #111 or Auburn regarding
provision of water service, except as specifically set forth herein.
15. Duration. This Agreement shall take effect on the last day approved by all of
the Parties and shall remain in effect until modified by written agreement of the
Parties.
16. Recording. Pursuant to RCW 39.34.040, following the approval and execution
of this Agreement by the Parties, this Agreement shall be filed with the King County
Auditor.
i
Auburn Resolution No 3920
Kent,WD#111 and Auburn Interlocal Agreement
Establishing Water Service Boundaries
Page 4 of 9
CITY OF KENT
Approved by Motion No. of the City of Kent, Kent, Washington, at its
regular meeting held on the day of ,
2006.
By:
Suzette Cooke, Mayor
City of Kent
Approved as to form:
City Attorney
City of Kent
KING COUNTY WATER DISTRICT NO. 111
Approved by Resolution No. of the King County Water District No. 111,
Kent, Washington, at its regular meeting held on the day of �vnz.
2006.
By: �Q
1 V t .-
x2�
' Patrick Hanis, President
King County Water District No. 111
Approved as-to form:
h General Counsel
King County Water District No. 111
Auburn Resolution No 3920
Kent,WD 9111 and Auburn Interlocal Agreement
Establishing Water Service Boundanes
Page 5 of 9
I
CITY OF AUBURN
Approved by Resolution No. of the City of Auburn, Washington, at its
regular meeting held on the day of 2006.
By:
Peter B. Lewis, Mayor
City of Auburn
Attest:
Danielle Daskam, City Clerk
Appr
Daniel B. Held-,-City Attorney
l
1
i
Auburn Resolution No.3920
Kent,WD#111 and Aubum Interlocal Agreement
Establishing Water Service Boundaries
Page 6 of 9
ST
284th
co w w
E 286th ST
CITY F
SERVI E RE4
SE 288th ST E 28M PL
w
t w
�� WATER DISTRICT 11
SERVICE AREA ICY
ji
W SE 298M PL ti
PL
PL SE P w
1
F L a 3E 301ST
4� 2ND ST
co
SE 304th
ST
TH Sr SE 305H PL CITY OF AUB RN �w �� sF
T,
pL
J ^^ J
1 TH ST _= SERVIC SE 306TH
n SE 3067H CT
a m m
c�i N w SE [/]
SE 307TH P N w i ^ 306rH PL
SSE 308TH PL ul SE 307"�'
SE 306TH PL SE �81Fi
PL
SE 08TH
Pt- r d
CITY OF KENT
KING COUNTY WATER DISTRICT NO. III
AND CITY OF AUBURN
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT ESTABLISHING
WATER SERVICE BOUNDARIES
ATTACHMENT I
Attachment 2
Legal Description
THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER AND THE SOUTHWEST
QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. IN
KING COUNTY WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF GOVERNMENT LOT 3 IN
SAID SECTION 4;
THENCE WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 3 A
DISTANCE OF 30 FEET TO THE WEST MARGIN OF 124T" AVENUE SOUTHEAST
AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID WEST MARGIN TO THE NORTHERLY MARGIN
OF SOUTHEAST 304TH STREET;
THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHERLY MARGIN OF SE 304T" STREET j
TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE PLAT OF CRYSTAL MEADOWS AS
RECORDED IN VOLUME 194 OF PLATS AT PAGES 66 AND 67, RECORDS OF
KING COUNTY;
THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE NORTHEASTERLY EDGE OF SAID
PLAT TO THE MOST NORTHERLY CORNER OF LOT 10 OF SAID PLAT;
THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE NORTH EDGE OF SAID PLAT TO THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 15 OF SAID PLAT;
THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 15 TO A POINT 50
FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF TRACT 11 OF THE PLAT OF
THE SOUND TRUSTEE COMPANY'S THIRD ADDITION, ACCORDING TO THE
PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 13 OF PLATS AT PAGE 100,
RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON;
THENCE NORTHWESTERLY TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH
HALF OF SAID TRACT 11, SAID POINT LYING 135 FEET WEST OF THE EAST
LINE OF SAID TRACT 11; '
Auburn Resolution No 3920
Kent,WD#111 and Auburn Interlocal Agreement
Establishing Water Service Boundaries
Page 8 of 9
i
' THENCE CONTINUING NORTHWESTERLY TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE
OF SAID TRACT 11, SAID POINT LYING 313.36 FEET WEST OF THE
NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT 11;
THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE LINE COMMON TO TRACTS 10 AND 11 OF
SAID PLAT OF THE SOUND TRUSTEE COMPANY'S THIRD ADDITION TO THE
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH 120 FEET OF SAID
TRACT 10;
THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE
SOUTH 120 FEET OF SAID TRACT 10 TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE
EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH 120 FEET OF SAID TRACT 10;
THENCE WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 120 FEET OF SAID
TRACT 10 TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID TRACT 10;
THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF SAID TRACT 10 AND THE WEST
LINE OF TRACT 9 OF SAID PLAT OF THE SOUND TRUSTEE COMPANY'S THIRD
ADDITION TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TRACT 9;
tTHENCE EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 9 TO THE
NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT 9 AND THE WEST LINE OF THE
SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 4;
THENCE NORTH ALONG LAST SAID WEST LINE AND THE WEST LINE OF
I GOVERNMENT LOT 3 OF SAID SECTION 4 TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF
SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 3;
THENCE EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 3 TO
THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
Auburn Resolution No.3920
I Kent,WD#111 and Auburn Interlocal Agreement
Establishing Water Service Boundaries
Page 9 of 9
j
t
i
Kent City Council Meeting
Date August 1, 2006
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: BILL OF SALE, COPPER HILL — ACCEPT
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Accept the Bill of Sale for Copper Hill for 4 sewer
manholes and 861 linear feet of sanitary sewer. This project is located at 22521 — 104`,
Ave. SE.
1 3. EXHIBITS: Bill of Sale
4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Director
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. FISCAL IMPACT
Expenditure" N/A Revenue? N/A
Currently in the Budget? Yes No
If no:
Unbudgeted Expense: Fund Amount $
iUnbudgeted Revenue: Fund Amount $
6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
ICouncil Agenda
Item No 6E
t
Bill of Sale
Page 1 of 2
1 KENT
I WASHINGTON
MAIL TO:
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
1 ATTN: MARK DAMON
220 47"AVENUE SOUTH
KENT,WASHINGTON 98032
PROJECT: COPPER HILL
LOCATION: 103XXX SE 225'ST
TAX ACCT NO: 172205-90"
BILL OF SALE
CITY OF KENT
KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON
THIS INSTRUMENT made this f (En day of ),I"L 11 2006,by and between
SWG CONSTRUCTION INC,hereinafter called "Grantors",and City of Kent,a municipal
corporation of King County,State of Washington,herinafter called"Grantee":
WITNESSETH:
That the said Grantors for a valuable consideration,does hereby grant,bargain,sell to
Grantee the following described improvements:
A. _WATF.RMAINS: together with a total of N/A gate valves at$ N/A
each, hydrants at$ each and/or any other
appurtenances thereto. i
ON FROM TO
' (street,esmt,etc)
Including N/A linear feet at$ N/A per LF of N/A
(size&type) waterline.
B. SANITARY SEWERS: Together with a total of FOUR manholes at
$3,000 each and/or any other appurtenances thereto.
ON FROM TO
(street,esmt,etc)
( Including 861 linear feet at$ 35 per LF of 8"PVC sewer line.
' C. I Together with curbs,gutters,sidewalks,and/or any other appurtenances
thereto.
nor cnnnT Tn
1
Bill of Sale
Page 2 of 2
ON FROM TO
(street,esmt,etc)
Including N/A linear feet at$ N/A per LF of
(size&type) sewer line.
To have and to hold the same to the said Grantee,its successors and assigns forever.
The undersigned hereby covenants that it is the lawful owner of said property;and that the
same is free from all encumbrances; that all bills for labor and material have been paid; that
it has the right to sell the same aforesaid; that it will warrant and defend the same against the
lawful claims and demand of all person.
The Bill of Sale is given on consideration of the agreement of the Grantee for itself,its
successors and assigns to incorporate said utilities in its utility system and to maintain them as
provided in the applicable City Ordinances.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned has caused this instrument to be executed on this
day of ;L h .2006.
f �
r
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
)SS
COUNTY OF KING )
On this day of R ,2006, before me,the j
undersigned,a Notary PublieN and(or oe Stat�of Washington,duly commissioned and
sworn,personally app red l� 'l' �R?'\n to me
known to be the and
respectively o ' c)n the
that executed the foregoing instru ent,and ckn/gwledged the said instrument to he the free
and voluntary act and deed of saidy c-ct� l for the uses and
purposes therein mentioned,and on oath stated that they are authorized to execute the said
instrument.
Witness my hand and of ai j`hu"to affix the day and year first above written.
r Q�1,
r� \AoTA8y
L
ota Pub is in and f r the
�'4F N ' NUt U :'p= State g ` at� �n
WASH
My Commission Expires:
The Bill of Sale is given and accepted pursuant to a motion duly made,seconded,and passed
h,,tha Vhi ('maned of tho('ity of lCs nt Kina(`aunty Wachinatan_ nn the
I
1
KENT
W A S H I N G T G N
ADDENDUM TO BILL OF SALE
1 CITY OF KENT
KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
The figures used on the Bill of Sale for COPPER HILL
1 project dated JUNE 16, 2006 ,were
Ibased on the "As-Built" Engineering Plans dated MAY 16,2006 , for
the same said COPPER HILL project.
SHUPE HOLMBERG the
undersigned P.E. or land surveyor is the person responsible for the preparation of the Bill
of Sale and is an employee of BAIMA & HOLMBERG, INC. , the firm
responsible for the preparation of the "As-Built" Engineering Drawings.
jSignature f` %:,;4; ,� E
r s•
•. f r• Jlr'rF' .�'
EXp3r7ES 1770
1
Kent City Council Meeting
Date August 1, 2006
! Category Consent Calendar
! 1. SUBJECT: BILL OF SALE, EAST HILL VILLAGE — ACCEPT
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Accept the Bill of Sale for East Hill Village for 3 gate
valves and 287 linear feet of watermain. This project is located at 22521 — 1041h Ave.
SE.
3. EXHIBITS: Bill of Sale
r4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Director
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. FISCAL IMPACT
Expenditure9 N/A Revenue? N/A
Currently in the Budget? Yes No
If no:
Unbudgeted Expense: Fund Amount $
' Unbudgeted Revenue: Fund Amount $
6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
! Council Agenda
Item No. 6F
Bill of Sale
Page l of 3
KENT
WASH 1 N G T O N
MAIL TO:
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
ATTN:
220 4Tn AVENUE SOUTH
KENT,WASHINGTON i 94803`2 PROJECT: Cast th it V {liar/
LOCATION:
TAX ACCT NO:
IBILL OF SALE
CITY OF KENT
' KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON
THIS INSTRUMENT made this 28th day of February 2006,by and between Madrona Real
Estate,hereinafter called "Grantors",and City of Kent,a municipal corporation of King County,
State of Washington,herinafter called "Grantee":
1 WITNESSETH:
That the said Grantors for a valuable consideration,does hereby grant,bargain,sell to
Grantee the following described improvements:
A. WATERMAINS: together with a total of 3 gate valves at$ 700.00 each, and 3
Ihydrants at $ 2,500.00 each and/or any other appurtenances thereto.
ON FROM TO
I 256`6 St SE 465 feet west of the Intersection of Into project site via easement
104th Ave SE & 256th St SE
Including 252 linear feet at$ 90.00 per LF of 8"Ductile Iron waterline.
1 Including 35 linear feet at$ 55.00 per LF of 6"Ductile Iron waterline.
B. SANITARY SEWERS: Together with a total of manholes at
$ each and/or any other appurtenances thereto.
ON FROM TO
(street, esmt, etc)
Including linear feet at$ per LF of
(size&type) sewer line.
C. STREETS: Together with curbs, gutters,sidewalks,and I or any other appurtenances
thereto.
Bill of Sale
Page 2 of 3
CF of detention pond storage with a total cost of$ and/or anv
other appurtenances thereto. ,
ON FROM TO
(street,esmt, etc)
Including linear feet at$ per LF of
(size&type) server line.
To have and to hold the same to the said Grantee,its successors and assigns forever.
The undersigned hereby covenants that it is the lawful owner of said property; and that the '
same is free from all encumbrances; that all bills for labor and material have been paid; that
it has the right to sell the same aforesaid; that it will warrant and defend tine same against the
lawful claims and demand of all person.
The Bill of Sale is given on consideration of the agreement of the Grantee for itself,its
successors and assigns to incorporate said utilities in its utility system and to maintain them as
provided in the applicable City Ordinances.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the undersigned has caused this instru nt to be executed on this
1 day o Ayim , 20 .
STATE OF WASHIN TON }
'SS iCOUNTY OF KING )
On this day of , 20 ,before me,the '
undersigned A Notary Public in and for the State of Washington,duly commissioned and
sworn,Personally appeared to me known to be the
individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me
that he/she signed and sealed this instrument as his/her free and voluntary act and deed for
the uses and purposes therein mentioned.
GIVEN under my hand and official seal this day of 20 ,
Notary Public in and for the
State of Washington,residing at
My Commission Expires: '
Bill of Sale
Page 3 of 3
Witness my hand and official seal hereto affix the day and year first above written.
1 ENNLY&tARIE BREIDENBRC#i Notary Public in and for the
STATE OF WASNINGTON State of s 'ngton, residing at
NOTARY-_• PUBLIC L L�7
WY COMMISSION EXPIRES 03-29.00 My Commission Expires-
(A , 0
The Bill of Sale is given and accepted pursuant to a motion duly made,seconded and passed
by the City Council of the City of Kent,King County,Washington, on the }
day of 520
1
!
!
1
1
1
1
i
1
1
1
1
1
KEN TT
WASHINOTON
ADDENDUM TO BILL OF SALE
CITY OF KENT
IQNG COUNTY,WASHINGTON
The figures used on the Bill of Sale for the water main-extension for Madrona Real Estate's
East Hill Village project dated December 6.2004,were based on the"As-Built" ,
Engineering Plans dated February 20'h,2006,for the same said East Hill Village project.
Erik S.Davido the undersigned P.E. is the person responsible for the preparation of the
Bill of Sale and is an employee of Davido Consulting Group,Inc.,the firm
responsible for the preparation of the"As-Built"Engineering Drawings.
Signature
1
Kent City Council Meeting
Date August 1, 2006
Category Consent Calendar
1 1. SUBJECT: BILL OF SALE, STARWOOD —ACCEPT
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Accept the Bill of Sale for Starwood for 4 gate
valves, 2 hydrants, 460 linear feet of watermams, 6 sewer manholes, 698 linear feet of
sanitary sewer, 410 centerline linear feet of streets, 2 storm manholes, 10 catch basins,
100 lmear feet of biofiltration swale, 8,600 cubic feet of detention pond storage, and
528 linear feet of sewer This project is located at 26521 — 114th Ave SE
3. EXHIBITS: Bill of Sale
' 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Director
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
j5. FISCAL IMPACT
Expenditure? N/A Revenue? N/A
Currently in the Budget? Yes No
If no:
Unbudgeted Expense: Fund Amount $
Unbudgeted Revenue: Fund Amount $
' 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
' Item No 6G
1 Bill of Sale
' Page 1 of 3
i
i KENT
WASHINGTON
' MAIL TO:
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
ATTN: Mark Damon
220 4"AVENUE SOUTH
KENT,WASHINGTON 98032
PROJECT: Plat of Starwood
KIVA 2021209
' LOCATION: 26521 114`h Ave SE
TAX ACCT NO:
BILL OF SALE
CITY OF KENT
KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON
THIS INSTRUMENT made this day of 20 ,by and
between ,
hereinafter called "Grantors",and City of Kent, a municipal corporation of King County,State of
Washington,herinafter called"Grantee":
WITNESSETH:
' That the said Grantors for a valuable consideration,does hereby grant,bargain,sell to
Grantee the following described improvements:
' A. WATERMAINS: together with a total of Four gate valves at$ 600 each,
Two hydrants at$ 1400 each and/or any other appurtenances thereto.
ON FROM TO
SE 265"h PL Sta 6+30 Sta 10+90
+
Including 460 linear feet at$ 28 per LF of 8" PVC waterline.
B. SANITAR C .WFRS: Together with a total of Six manholes at
$ 3,500 each and/or any other appurtenances thereto.
iON FROM TO
SE 265`h PI Private Rd. Sta 21+47 Sta 22+92
' SE 265`h PL Sta 6+30 Sta 6+80
SE 265`h PL Sta 7+70 Sta 10+48
114`h Ave SE Sta 29+95 Sta 32+20
' Including 698 linear feet at$ 30 per LF of 8"PVC sewer line.
!, QTT V. --A i
Bill of Sale
Page 2 of 3 ,
D. STO M S W .RS: Together with a total of Two manholes at$ 2,000
each or a total of Ten catch basins at$ 900 each, 100 LF of
biofiltration swale or drainage ditch with a total cost of$ 1600 , 8600 CF of
detention pond storage with a total cost of$ 21,000 ,and/or any other
appurtenances thereto.
ON FROM TO
SE 265"'PL Private Rd. Sta 20+30 Sta 23+10
SE 265'h PL Private Rd. Sta 20+65, 17' RT Sta 20+65, 114' RT
SE 265`"PL Sta 9+85, 14' LT Sta 9+85,45' RT
SE 265 'PL Sta 9+959 34' RT Sta 10+87,35' RT '
Including 528 linear feet at$ 25 per LF of 12"PVC sewer line.
To have and to hold the same to the said Grantee,its successors and assigns forever. ,
The undersigned hereby covenants that it is the lawful owner of said property; and that the
same is free from all encumbrances; that all bills for labor and material have been paid; that
it has the right to sell the same aforesaid; that it will warrant and defend the same against the
lawful claims and demand of all person.
The Bill of Sale is given on consideration of the agreement of the Grantee for itself,its
successors and assigns to incorporate said utilities in its utility system and to maintain them as
provided in the applicable City Ordinances. '
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned has caused this instrume t to be executed on this
day of 20
1
STATE OF WASHINGTON ) '
)SS
COUNTY OF KING
On this �/ — day of 4 cr. 20 L before me,the
undersigned A Notary Public{nand for the State of ashington,duly commissioned and
sworn,Personally appeared} t'D r1�,A-->� �n ���: to me known to be the
individual described in and who executed the(f4regoing instrument,and acknowledged to me
that he/she signed and sealed this instrument as his/her free and voluntary act and deed for
the uses and purposes therein mentioned.
GIVEN under my hand and official seal this 1"� day of�
BETH-ANN PETERSON
NOTARY PUBLIC Notary Public in and for the '
STATE OF WASHINGTON State of Washington,residing at
COMMISSION EXPIRES )
APRIL 9, 2006
My Commission Ex ires:
Bill of Sale
Page 3 of 3
respectively of the
that executed the foregoing instrument,and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free
and voluntary act and deed of said for the uses and
purposes therein mentioned,and on oath stated that they are authorized to execute the said
instrument.
Witness my hand and official seal hereto affix the day and year first above written.
Notary Public in and for the
State of Washington,residing at
My Commission Expires:
The Bill of Sale is given and accepted pursuant to a motion duly made,seconded,and passed
by the City Council of the City of Kent,King County,Washington,on the
day of ,20
t
KENT
WASH I N G T O N
ADDENDUM TO BILL OF SALE
CITY OF KENT ,
KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
The figures used on the Bill of Sale for The Plat of Starwood - KIVA 2021209
project dated October 4,2002 ,were
based on the"As-Built" Engineering Plans dated r ,February 11,2004 , for
the same said Plat of��w ��T U.� project.
Robert Balmelli PE the
undersigned P.E. or land surveyor is the person responsible for the preparation of the Bill
of Sale and is an employee of RB Engineering Inc. , the
firm responsible for the preparation of the"As-Built"Engineering Drawings. ,
iguature
Kent City Council Meeting
Date Aufzust 1, 2006
' Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: BILL OF SALE, STARMEADOW— ACCEPT
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Accept the Bill of Sale for Starmeadow for 4 gate
valves, 1 hydrant, 530 linear feet of watermains, 9 sewer manholes, 822 linear feet of
sanitary sewer, 510 centertme linear feet of streets, 6 storm manholes, 9 catch basins,
10,000 cubic feet of detention pond storage, and 880 linear feet of sewer This project
is located at 26525 — 114`h Ave. SE.
' 3. EXHIBITS: Bill of Sale
' 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Director
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. FISCAL IMPACT
Expenditure? N/A Revenue? N/A
Currently in the Budget? Yes No
If no:
Unbudgeted Expense: Fund Amount $
Unbudgeted Revenue: Fund Amount $
6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No 6H
Bill of Sale
Page I of 3
4# �60�00
\SS7
KEN T
' W A S H I N G T O N
MAIL TO:
' ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
ATTN: Mark Damon
220 4T"AVENUE SOUTH
KENT,WASHINGTON 98032
PROJECT: Plat of Starmeadow
KIVA 2020080
' LOCATION: 26525 114`h Ave SE
TAX ACCT NO:
1 BILL OF SALE
' CITY OF KENT
KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON
' THIS INSTRUMENT made this day of 20 ,by and
between
hereinafter called "Grantors",and City of Kent,a municipal corporation of King County,State of
' Washington,herinafter called"Grantee":
WITNESSETH:
' That the said Grantors for a valuable consideration,does hereby grant,bargain,sell to
Grantee the following described improvements:
' A. WATERMAIN4: together with a total of Four gate valves at S 600 each,
One hydrants at S 1500 each and/or any other appurtenances thereto.
' ON FROM TO
SE 266"'PL Sta 1+00 Sta 3+50
112`h SE Sta 3+50 Sta 6+30
Including 530 linear feet at$ 28 per LF of 8" PVC waterline.
' B. SANITARY SEWERS: Together with a total of Nine manholes at
S 3,500 each and/or any other appurtenances thereto.
ON FROM TO
SE 266"'PL Sta 0+88 Sta 3+50
112`h SE Sta 3+50 Sta 6+30
SE 266 h St.Private Rd. Sta 20+65 Sta 22+05
SE 266`h PI Private Rd. Sta 10+00 Sta 11+35
Tnrb.d;no R77 linear font at 4t in nrr IN of R"PVC sewer line.
Bill of Sale
Page 2 of 3 ,
D. STORM SF, : Together with a total of Six manholes at S 2,000
each and a total of Nine catch basins at S 900 each, 0 ,
LF of biofiltration swale or drainage ditch with a total cost of S 10,000 CF of
detention pond storage with a total cost of S 25,000 ,and/or any other
appurtenances thereto.
ON FROM TO
SE 266'h PL Sta 0+85 Sta 2+20
112'h SE Sta 2+75 Sta 5+25 '
Private Easement Sta 30+00 Sta 31+00
SE 266'h St.Private Rd. Sta 20+70 Sta 21+95
SE 266h PI Private Rd. Sta 10+14 Sta 10+30 ,
Including 880 linear feet at$ 25 per LF of 12"P VC se"er line.
To have and to hold the same to the said Grantee,its successors and assigns forever.
The undersigned hereby covenants that it is the lawful owner of said property;and that the
same is free from all encumbrances; that all bills for labor and material have been paid; that
it has the right to sell the same aforesaid; that it will warrant and defend the same against the
lawful claims and demand of all person.
The Bill of Sale is given on consideration of the agreement of the Grantee for itself, its
successors and assigns to incorporate said utilities in its utility system and to maintain them as
provided in the applicable City Ordinances. ,
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,tke undersigned has caused this instrument to be executed on this
day of 2W ,
i
STATE OF WASHINGTON ) '
)SS
COUNTY OF KING ) I
On this lam day of " 20 0' , before me,the
undersigned A Notary Public in and for the State o Washington,duly commissioned and
sworn,Personally appeared /4-kk- QA^ S;a4& to me known to be the
individual described in and who executed the foregojog instrument,and acknowledged to me
that he/she signed.aviswajed this instrument as his/her free and voluntary act and deed for
the uses and Vtss. g1i{.pientioned.
GIVEN under my Santa•ft',9-6-lgl~fjAl8searhis day of 6 20
PUBLtGtia:-e
�9UARY�5% C9 e.`s
•` T� �\�O
OF WAS . No Public in and for the
eee ry
,,t•��••'"""�"��ee Statj of Washington, residing at
My Commosiou�Expires•a ar
Bill of Sale
Page 3 of3
to me known to be the individuals who MM&
xxspeati^UlWXX XHg
' Aimkexecuted the foregoing instrument,and acknowledged the said instrument to he the free
and voluntary act and deed akxaM for the uses and
purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that they are authorized to execute the said
' instrument.
Witness my hand and official seal hereto affix the day and year first abode vritten.
i�«4R6�^•S IF9StfrF
e4��•`' � S 01YO
F,a • ry Publ' in od for the
z�pTARY !0 State of hi tQo, residing at
�! .� .
GARY P SCHUET2
-A 'l. a
v,.-' %Y' 4—n
%' ''••,ir•S'rrIM1111101 05/04/07.
The Bill of Sale is given and accepted pursuant to a motion duly made,seconded, and passed
by the City Council of the City of Kent,King County,Washington,on the
day of ,20
KENT
WASH IN G T O N '
ADDENDUM TO BILL OF SALE
CITY OF KENT '
KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON '
The figures used on the Bill of Sale for The Plat of Starmeadow- KIVA 2020080
project dated August 23,2002 ,were
based on the "As-Built"Engineering Plans dated February 11, 2004 , for
the same said Plat of Starmeadow project.
Robert Balmelli PE the '
undersigned P.E. or land surveyor is the person responsible for the preparation of the Bill
of Sale and is an employee of RB En2ineerin2 Inc. ,the
firm responsible for the preparation of the"As-Built"Engineering Drawings.
Signature
Kent City Council Meeting
Date August 1, 2006
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: BILL OF SALE, 3RD AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS —ACCEPT
' 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Accept the Bill of Sale for 3`d Avenue Improvements
for 190 linear feet of storm drain. This project is located at 1001 — 3`d Ave. S.
3. EXHIBITS: Bill of Sale
4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Director
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc )
5. FISCAL IMPACT
Expenditure? N/A Revenue? N/A
Currently in the Budget? Yes No
If no:
Unbudgeted Expense: Fund Amount $
Unbudgeted Revenue• Fund Amount $
6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 6I
Bill of Sale
Page 1 of 1
�EN
WASHINGTON
MAIL TO:
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
ATTN:
220 4TT'AVENUE SOUTH
KENT,WASHINGTON 98032
PROJECT: 3rd Avenue Improvements
LOCATION: 1001 3rd Avenue South
TAX ACCT NO: 000 600-0083-01
BILL OF SALE
CITY OF KENT
KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON
THIS INSTRUMENT made this 8 day of March 20 04 by and
between Signal Electr_ Lc, Inc.
hereinafter called"Grantors",and City of Kent,a municipal corporation of King County,State of
Washington,herinafter called"Grantee":
WITNESSETH:
That the said Grantors for a valuable consideration,does hereby grant,bargain,sell to
Grantee the following described improvements:
A. WATF.RMATNS: together with a total of gate valves at$
each, hydrants at$ each and/or any other
appurtenances thereto.
ON FROM TO
(street,esmt,etc)
Including linear feet at$ per LF of
(size& type) waterline.
B. SANITARY SEWERS: Together with a total of manholes at
$ each and/or any other appurtenances thereto.
ON FROM TO
(street,esmt,etc)
Including linear feet at$ per LF of
(size& type) sewer line.
C. STRFETS: Together with curbs,gutters,sidewalks, and/or any other appurtenances
thereto.
Bill of Sale
Page 2 of 2
CF of detention pond storage with a total cost of$ , and/or any
other appurtenances thereto.
ON 3rd Avenue South iilOirl 10+48.59 SW TO 14+35 SW
(street, esmt, etc)
Including 190 linear feet atS 216.27 perLFof Storm Drain
(size oc type) '- PVC sewer Nale.
To have and to hold the same to the said Grantee,its successors and assigns forever.
The undersigned hereby covenants that it is the lawful owner of said property; and that the
same is free from all encumbrances; that all bills for labor and material have been paid; that
it has the right to sell the same aforesaid; that it will warrant and defend the same against the
lawful claims and demand of all person.
The Bill of Sale is given on consideration of the agreement of the Grantee for itself,its
successors and assigns to incorporate said utilities in its utility system and to maintain them as
provided in the applicable City Ordinances.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned has caused this instrument to be executed on this
8 day of March 20 04
Bernell ithmiller, President
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
SS
COUNTY OF KING )
On this t) day of 1� '``4' ,20 D `' ,before me,the
undersigned A Notary Public in and for the State of Washington,duly commissioned and
sworn,Personally appeared fix tn<it i?-.c-,"-rr,.,.-I ' ( to me known to be the
individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument,and acknowledged to me
that he/she signed and sealed this instrument as his/her free and voluntary act and deed for
the uses and purposes therein mentioned.
GIVEN under my hand and official seal this $ day of 20
Notary Public in and for the
State of Washington,residing at
i
My Commission Expires:
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
�cc
KEN T
W A S H I N G T O N
ADDENDUM TO BILL OF SALE
CITY OF KENT
KING COUNTY,WASIUNGTON
The figures used on the Bill of Sale for 3rd Avenue Improvements
Kent, WA project dated 08-21-01 ,were
based on the"As-Built" Engineering Plans dated 08-21-01 ,for
the same said 3rd Avenue Improvements project.
Charles price the
undersigned P.E. or land surveyor is the person responsible for the preparation of the Bill
of Sale and is an employee of ECG Inc. ,the firm
responsible for the preparation of the"As-Built" Engineering Drawings.
l� 1
r�!
T
Signature ✓✓✓
j
Kent City Council Meeting
Date August 1, 2006
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: BILL OF SALE, KENT STATION, PHASE I—ACCEPT
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Accept the Bill of Sale for Kent Station Phase I for 6
gate valves, 60 linear feet of watermam, 8 sewer manholes, and 1,164 linear feet of
sanitary sewer. This project is located at 528— Is' Ave N.
3. EXHIBITS: Bill of Sale
4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Director
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. FISCAL IMPACT
Expenditure? N/A Revenue? N/A
Currently in the Budget? Yes No
If no:
Unbudgeted Expense: Fund Amount $
Unbudgeted Revenue: Fund Amount $
6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No 6J
Bill of Sale
Page t of 3
4400
KENT
WASHINGTON
MAIL TO
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
ATI N nr_-te Cana5aurll0
220 4"i AV ENUE SOUTH
KENT,WASHING CON 98032
PROJECT Kent Slatton
LOCATION Phase I
TA%A CCT NO:
BILL OF SALE
CITY OF KENT
KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON
THIS INSTRUMENT made this Z3" day of -AUK>✓ 2006 by and
between _FAKKAGeM— Kett-T SY *Vfi&" 3"'M 1 I..F.0
hereinafter called"Grantors",and City of Kent,a municipal eorpoi ation of King County,State of
Washington,hereinafter called"Grantee'
W ITNESSETH:
That the said Grantors for a valuable consideration,does hereby grant,bargain,sell to
Grantee the following described improvements:
A WATERMAINS: togethel with a total of 6 gate valves at$700
each, 4 hydrants at$2.500 each and/or any other
appurtenances thereto.
ON FROM TO
(street,esmt,etc)
Ramsav N'ai, Temperance Street 4th Avenue North
Including 60 linear feet at S 70 per LF of 8-inch D_I.
(size&type) watnhne.
B. SANITARI SEWERS Together with a total of 8 manholes at
S 2.500 _each and/or any other appurtenances thereto.
ON FROM TO
(street,esmt,etc)
Kent Station Phase I 1st Avenue North 41h Avenue North
Including 1.164 linear feet at S 80 per LF of 8-mch PVC
(sine&type) sewer line.
C. STRFFTS: Together with curbs,gutters,sidewalks,and/or any other appurtenances
thereto
ON FROM TO
(stiect,esmt,etc) `
Including centerhne LF at S per LF of
(type)streets, Feet asphalt i oadway
Page 1 of 3 1 zeal ola doc[vsrod
Bill of Sale
Bill of sale
Pagc of 3
D. sTnRn1 SL\]'_FFRS: Together with a total of manholes at$
each of a total of catch basins at$ each, LF
ofbiofiltration so ale or drainage(Inch with a total cost of$
CF of detention pond storage with a total cost of$ and/or any
other appurtenances thereto.
ON FROM TO
(street,esmt,etc)
i
Including linear feet at$ per LF of
(site&type) sewer line.
To have and to hold the same to the said Grantee,its successors and assigns forever
The undersigned hereby covenants that it is the lawful owner of said property;and that the
same is See from all encumbrances, that all bills foi labor and material hate been paid,that
it has the right to sell the same aforesaid:that it will warrant and defend the same against the
lawful claims and demand of all person.
The Bill of Sale is given on consideration of the agreement of the Grantee for itself,its r�
successors and assigns to incorporate said utilities in its utility system and to maintain them as
provided in the applicable City Ordinances
IN W TNE�WHEREOF the undersigned has caused this instrument to be executed on this
day of . JtAw 200('� .
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
SS
COUNTY OF fiING
Ou this day of`, LA1-L, ,20_Q(a before me,the
undersigned A Natal y Public in and for the State of shmgton,duly commissioned and
svvoin,Personalh appealed Tg �1 6P� to me known to he the
mditrdual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument,and acknowledged to me
that helshe stZued and sealed thus insti ument as his/her free and voluntary act and deed for
the uses and purposes thei ein mentioned.
GIVEN umlf lrvfi%y�'li''Zitl4iofficial seal thrs�3 day oft, LA 4d,4 20Q_.
r Q`f";�>,jjg��vvSl OJ�IV//•F77����+1+
o %aoTARy�S —Notary Public in and for the
i •O `�"'� i State of Wasbungton,residing at
tPP PUBOG
A
__: �
t+tt ' p� � N�CN�.7 My Commission Expues.__.
e,, S
a - l9-
r
Page 2 of 3 11361 oia doc lVA1061
Bill of Sale
Bill of Sale
Page 3 of 3
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
)SS
COUNTY OF KING )
On this day of 20 before
me,the undersigned,a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington,duly commissioned
and sworn,personally appeared and
to me known to be the and
respechaely of the
that executed the foregoing instrument,and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free
and voluntary act and deed of said for the uses and
purposes therein mentioned,and on oath slated that they at a authorized to execute the said
Instrument.
Witness my hand and official seal hereto affix the day and year first above written.
Notary Public in and for the
State of Washington,j esidmg at
My Commission Fxplres:
The Bill of Sale is given and accepted pursuant to a motion duly made,seconded,and passed
by the Cit3 Council of the City of Kent,King County,Washington,on the
day of .20
i
I
i
Page 3 of 3 11361 ew doe 12a111061
Bill of Sale
j-
40
KENT
WASHINGTON
ADDENDUM TO BILL OF SALE
CITY OF KENT
KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
The figures used on the Bill of Sale for Kent Station Phase I
project dated June 23, 2006 ,were
based on the"As-Built" Engineering Plans dated March 15, 2006 ,for
the same said Kent Station Phase 1 project.
Ali Sadr the
undersigned P.E. or land surveyor is the person responsible for the preparation of the Bill
of Sale and is an employee of BarQhausen Consulting Engineers , the firm
responsible for the preparation of the "As-Built" Engineering Drawings.
Signature
i
kent 016 doc PJ9/06]
I
Kent City Council Meeting
Date August 1, 2006
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: WESTERN ARTS FEDERATION GRANT—ACCEPT AND
AMEND BUDGET
2 SUMMARY STATEMENT: Accept the $2,500 grant from Western State Arts
Federation in support of Keola Beamer's Hawaiian Holiday Concert, and the
expenditure of funds in the Kent Arts Commission's budget, and authorize the Mayor to
sign all grant related agreements.
Western States Arts Federation (WESTAF) has awarded the Kent Arts Commission a
"TourWest" grant to fund the presentation of a touring performance plus educational
activities in the 2006-2007 Spotlight Series season The maximum amount of$2,500
has been awarded to present Keola Beamer's Hawaiian Holiday Concert on
December 2, 2006
3. EXHIBITS: King County Grant No. TWP070131
4. RECOMMENDED BY: Parks and Human Services Committee
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. FISCAL IMPACT
Expenditure's X Revenue? X
Currently in the Budget? Yes No X
If no:
Unbudgeted Expense: Fund 10006222.64190.4310 Amount $2,500.00
Unbudgeted Revenue: Fund 10006222.53315.4310 Amount $2,500.00
6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No 6K
June 13, 2006
2006-2007 TourWest Contract
Presenter: City of Kent Arts Commission
Artist/Company: Keola Beamer
Engagement Dates 12/2/2006 - 12/2/2006
Number of Outreach Activities 2 Number of Public Performances: 1
TourWest Award Amount. $2500 Artistic Fees: $6300
TourWest Grant Number: TWP070131
The Western States Arts Federation (WESTAF) shall assign the grant award amount for the
presenter listed above following the return of a signed coos of this contract within 30 days of the
date on this contract. Failure to return a signed copy of this contract in accordance with the
schedule shall result in the forfeiture of the grant award.
WESTAF shall pay the presenter 100% of the award amount listed above upon the submission
of the following tens within 60 days following the engagement: a copy of the performance
program, a current season brochure, published press releases, feature stories, and/or reviews.
Presenters will access the TourWest Final Report online at. http-1/westaf.cgweb org Further
information regarding the process of submitting TourWest Final Report information online will be
emailed to you before September 1, 2006.
If any dates, fees, andfor activities change at any time from those listed above, the presenter
must notify WESTAF within 30 days of the change. NOTE: Changes in plans may affect award
amounts and must meet the goals and review criteria of the TourWest program.
The above artistic fees shall be paid directly to the artist/company(or designated
representative) by the presenter as per the artist-presenter contract
All TourWest supported engagements must include at least (1) public performance A public
performance is defined as a full-length performance for which promotion and marketing to the
general public have been provided and the audience for which is a cross-section of the
community(e g. not primarily school-aged children during regular school hours). All TourWest
supported engagements must also include at least(1)outreach activity, for example. lecture-
demonstrations, master classes, in-school educational activities involving students with the
artist, etc.
All information and conditions contained in the 2006-2007 TourWest guidelines are incorporated
herein. By signing this contract, the presenter agrees to comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights
Act of 1964, as amended (42 U S-C. 2000d et seq ); Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of
1973 (29 US C 794)and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 ("ADA") (42 U.S.C. 12101-
12213); the Age Discrimination Act of 1975 (42 U S C. 6101 et seq.), Title IX of the Education
Amendments of 1972 (20 U.S.C. 1681 et seq.); and The Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988 (41
U.S.C. 701 et seq. And 45 C.F.R. pt. 1154); as well as all regulations of the National
Endowment for the Arts issued pursuant to these statutes, and the applicant thereby gives
assurance to immediately take any measures necessary to comply.
Grantees must clearly acknowledge support from the National Endowment for the Arts and
WESTAF in their programs and related promotional materials. Acknowledgement should be
given in text and graphically by using the NEA and WESTAF logos. Copies of both the WESTAF
and NEA logos may be found on the WESTAF website Please point your browser to
http //www.wesfaf org Alternately, you may request copies of these logos via regular or
i -
1 -
electronic mad by calling 303-629-1166. Acknowledgement of the Endowment and WESTAF's
support can be phrased in a variety of ways—for example.
Funding for the Commission and its programs is provided by the Western States Arts
Federation and the National Endowment for the Arts.
This project received support from the[your State Arts Agency], WESTAF, the Western
States Arts Federation;and the Nationaf Endowment for the Arts
Compliance is mandatory with all requirements, paperwork, and related timelines as described
herein; failure to comply may jeopardize current and/or future funding from WESTAF
TourWest is made possible through support from the National Endowment for the Arts, the
Western States Arts Federation (WESTAF), and its participating state arts agencies. Support
through TourWest is contingent on available funds
We the undersigned understand and will comply with the terms of this contract.
i4l
June13 2006
Y for WESTAF Date
�Yy VO
�i t'
for Presen er `-�U Date � 1
Lori Hogan, Interim Director
Name and title(typed)
220 4th Avenue
Address
Kent WA 98032
City, State Zip
Grant Contact- Ronda Billerbeck 253-856-5055, rbi71PrhPrkra i.kent,,' k
Phone/Fax/E-mail
Please return both pages within 30 days to:
WESTAF
1743 Wazee St,Suite 300
Denver, CO 80202
Phone: 303/629-1166
Fax: 3031629-9717
E-mail shannon daut@westaf.org
Kent City Council Meeting
Date August 1, 2006
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: SECOND QUARTER FEE-IN-LIEU FEES —ACCEPT AND
AMEND BUDGET
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Accept $31,500 for fee-in-lieu funds from Norris
Homes and Power Custom Homes, and authorize the expenditure of funds in the
Wilson Playfield and Clark Lake Park budgets
Between April and June 2006, the City of Kent received a total of$31,500 from two
developers who voluntarily paid fees, in lieu of dedicating park land to mitigate the
development of single family homes in two subdivision. Norris Homes paid $18,000
for Tahoma Vista development and Power Custom Homes paid $13,500 for Powers
Short Plat.
Ordinance 2975 requires developers to dedicate park and open space land in proximity
to new construction sites or to pay "fee-in-lieu" funds. The fee is based on assessed
land values
3. EXHIBITS: Copy of Finance Revenue Report
4. RECOMMENDED BY: Parks and Human Services Committee
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc )
5. FISCAL IMPACT
Expenditure? X Revenue? X
Currently in the Budget? Yes No - X
If no:
Unbudgeted Expense: Fund P20076 Amount $18,000 00
Unbudgeted Expense: Fund P20069 Amount $13,500 00
Unbudgeted Revenue: Fund P20013 56730 Amount $31,500.00
6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Counctlmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 6L
u
V
N
W QQ QQ
JIQ Q Q
ala a n.
C
0
o �
� rn
m
r- a
O
U
`o
`o
n
c
T
C t
p w O
6 ~ N
O J
N h
N
❑ `o o li
£ z n `
E
z m
m
V N
N
4 CIO O O
J
C9
m
a
a�
0 o p o 0
p o in m b �n
Elm v m m
v
# pp
N O fD
a0�O � N
r r r
u o o
p m
m o
m m
`o 0
!- m F-
o m <0 0
W O O C O C
O O 0 N 00
❑ N N O OU
J
U
Q
O
o U
N m
o � r
M y O
� n o
� a
w
0
0
N O O O
a r r
V N m
0 Z
L O O O
C7 0 O N N N
Kent City Council Meeting
Date August 1, 2006
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: STARBUCKS GRANT FOR CLARK LAKE TRAIL
DEVELOPMENT — ACCEPT AND AMEND BUDGET
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Accept the $15,000 grant from the Starbucks Coffee
Company in support of the Clark Lake Trail Development Project and authorize the
expenditure of funds in the Clark Lake Park budget
In April, Park staff applied for the Starbucks Coffee Company neighborhood park grant
program through the Kent Parks Foundation. Staff and Foundation members met the
granting agency at the park site April 28 and explained the scope of work planned for
trail development Staff and the Foundation Executive Director were informed on
June 5 that the project was funded in the amount of$15,000 Eleven Starbucks
employees participated in a community service project a Clark Lake Park on June 22,
and constructed the trail which started on National Trails Day, June 3. The grant will
be used to continue construction of the trail.
3. EXHIBITS: Starbucks Coffee Company award letter
4. RECOMMENDED BY: Parks and Human Services Committee
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. FISCAL IMPACT
Expenditure? X Revenue? X
Currently in the Budget? Yes No_X
If no.
Unbudgeted Expense: Fund P20069 Amount $15,500 00
Unbudgeted Revenue: Fund P20069.56718 Amount $15,500 00
6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 6M
Sraibucks Coffee Company
Pacific Northwest Region
2200 rutl Pwn ir,
sure IM
Seattle,WA 181-14
206/903-8224
FAX 206/623 4671
6116106
jMs.Sally McDanough
Kent Parks Foundation
26441 137th Ave.SE
Kent, WA 98042
Re:Starbucks Neighborhood Park Grants
Dear Ms. Sally McDanough,
Starbucks is pleased to have the opportunity to show its support for Kent Parks Foundation("YouNour")as a grant
recipient in the 2006 Starbucks Neighborhood Park Grants Program("Program")for the Clark Lake Park Trail
Construction (the"Protect"). The purpose of this letter is to outline the conditions of our cash donation of Fifteen
Thousand Dollars($15,000)(the"Donation")for the proposed park project submitted by Kent Parks Foundation in
this Program.
You acknowledge that Your organization(or your grant sponsor)is a charitable,nonprofit organization with 501(c)(3)
status. You agree that the Donation will be used for the Project and that Your organization has strong community
support and involvement by community members and that the Project will start within six months of the award
notification. If you are unable to or do not go forward with the Protect,You agree to return the Donation to Starbucks.
Once this letter has been signed by You and your grant sponsor(if applicable)and returned to Starbucks Coffee
Company, the cash Donation of$15,000 will be forwarded to either You or Your grant sponsor. You may contact
Gwen Edwards at Starbucks Coffee Company at(206)903-8224,ext. 2207 with any questions.
Should there be any promotional events,press releases or promotional materials prepared in connection with the
Donation by You, You agree to include the Starbucks logo and acknowledge Starbucks as a donor Starbucks shall
have at least ten(10)days prior to the printing of any materials containing Starbucks name,logo or other trademarks
to review and approve the use of such material You acknowledge that the permission granted to use Starbucks
name and trademarks is expressly limited to use in connection with the Donation All trademarks shall be reproduced
accurately and the matenats You create will not infringe upon the rights of any other party You will remove or correct
any use not consented to by Starbucks at Your expense. Any materials or products provided by Starbucks to You
are provided"as is,'without any warranty whatsoever
Starbucks shall have the right, but not the obhgahon to use Your name,logo,image andfor likeness without separate
written consent or compensation and identify itself as a donator in the Project and may use this information m its
Stas6uckc Coffee Company
Pacific Natthvvezt Region
2200 f r^I Aven00
Suite 100
Seattle WA Ile I✓7
206/W3 A224
FAX 20C/623-4671
advertising and/or press releases regarding the Program. In addition, Starbucks shall have the right,but not the
obligation,to promote Your activities
You agree to comply with all applicable laws and regulations governing the Project. You agree that Starbucks will
have no liability whatsoever and that You shall indemnify,defend and hold Starbucks harmless for any injuries,
losses, liabilities,claims or damages of any kind resulting in whole or in part from the Donaton.
In nine(9)months to one(1)year from the start of Your Project,You will be asked to provide a report to Slarbucks on
the success of Your Protect and the value of Starbucks Donation to the Project
Please signify Your acceptance of the conditions of our Donation contained in this letter by signing this letter and
returning it to the attention of Starbucks Neighborhood Parks Program at 2200 First Avenue S Suite 100 Seattle,WA
98134 or use the enclosed envelope. If you are using a grant sponsor,they will need to sign the letter as well.
We wish you every success in your efforts!
Very truly yours,
STARBUCKS CORPORATION
(d/b/a STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY)
Signature:_
Its:
Date:
Agreed to and Accepted:
NAME C��fCO S
Sign re: i
its -
Date: f
Grant Sponsor Name (if applicable)
Signature:
Its:
Date: Co 7 Y f,��
tKent City Council Meeting
Date August 1, 2006
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: S. 228TH EROSION CONTROL FINAL PAY ESTIMATE —
APPROVE
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Accept the S 2281h Street Erosion Control/Storm
Event Mitigation project as complete and release retamage to Scotty's General
Construction, Inc.
3. EXHIBITS: None
4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Director
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. FISCAL IMPACT
Expenditure? N/A Revenue?
Currently in the Budget? Yes No
If no:
Unbudgeted Expense• Fund Amount $
Unbudgeted Revenue: Fund Amount $
6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 6N
Kent City Council Meeting
Date August 1, 2006
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: TOWN SQUARE PLAZA FOUNTAIN BASE AGREEMENT—
AUTHORIZE
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Authorization for the Mayor to enter into an agreement
with Seattle Solstice LLC in the amount of$35,000, excluding Washington State Sales Tax to
design, fabricate and deliver the fountain base for the future Town Square Plaza, upon review
by the City Attorney
The Mayor waived the procurement requirement in accordance with Kent City Code 3 70 080
and determined it was in the City's best interest to negotiate directly with Seattle Solstice LLC
for the design, fabrication, and delivery of the fountain base because the entire fountain
(floating sphere and base) is being fabricated from one piece of imported granite. Not only is
it critical that the sphere be engineered to float freely inside of the base while maintaining the
tolerances necessary for proper functioning of the piece as a whole, but only two other
companies have the technology necessary to fabricate the base and they are located to
Germany and Japan, making it difficult to meet the City schedule and budget limitations.
3. EXHIBITS: Agreement with Seattle Solstice LLC and Sole Source Procurement
Waiver
4. RECOMMENDED BY: Parks and Human Services Committee
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc )
5. FISCAL IMPACT
Expenditure? Yes Revenue?
Currently in the Budget? Yes X No
If no:
Unbudgeted Expense: Fund Amount $
Unbudgeted Revenue: Fund Amount $
6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No 60
i
KENT
WnSHIMOTOH
CITY OF KENT
PARKS, RECREATION & COMMUNITY SERVICES
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Suzette Cooke
FROM: Lod Hogan,Acting Director
C: John Hodgson
SUBJECT: Waiver of Procurement Requirements
DATE: July 19, 2006
REFERENCE: Section 3.70.080 Kent City Code
Number 1.1.10 City of Kent Administration Policy
PROJECT: Town Square Plaza
FUNDING: General Obligation Bonds
The Parks Department is asking for a written determination waiving the bidding requirements as
allowed in the above referenced sections to purchase the base for the floating granite sphere
fountain that is being donated by the Kent Rotary Clubs as provided by Seattle Solstice LLC.
The estimated cost of the base is $35,000.00 which includes design, engineering, fabrication
and delivery. Applicable Washington State Sales Tax (WSST)of 8 8%will be added to the
contract. The funding source is City of Kent General Obligation Bonds dedicated towards the
development of Town Square Plaza.
jWe believe it is in the City's best interest to negotiate a purchase price directly with Seattle Solstice
LLC for the following reasons:
• Seattle Solstice is fabricating the sphere and base from the same piece of granite while the
granite piece being used has been imported from India for this protect
• It is critical that the sphere is engineered to float freely inside of the base while the
tolerances necessary between both pieces is essential in the proper function of the piece
as a whole_
• The only two other companies that have the technology to fabricate the base are located in
Germany and Japan, making it difficult to meet our schedule and budget
If you determine the procurement waiver is justified,and once the contract with Seattle Solstice LLC
is negotiated, it will be submitted to the Parks Committee and the City Council for signature
autho ion.
or S zette Cooke Date`
iTown Square Plaza 1 of 1 07/1 9/Oft
Fountain Base Waiver
AGREEMENT FOR ART WORK
KENT between the City of Kent and Seattle Solstice, LLC 1117
WnSMINOTON
THIS AGREEMENT is made between the City of Kent, a Washington municipal corporation (the "City"),
and Seattle Solstice, L.L.C. ("the Artist"), located and doing business at 7500 Fifth Avenue South, Seattle, WA
9H108.
iARTICLE 1. SCOPE OF SERVICES.
1.1 General.
a. The Artist shall perform all services and work, and furnish all supplies, materials, and
equipment as necessary for designing, engineering, fabricating and delivering to the City of the Work as
described in attached Exhibit A, incorporated by this reference (the "Work").
b. The Artist shall determine the artistic expression, scope, design,color,size, material, and
texture of the Work, subject to review and acceptance by the City.
C. The Artist will estimate the life of the Work and will guarantee durability of workmanship
and materials against normal exposure to the elements in the Town Square Plaza for five (5) years.
1.2 Structural Design Review.
a. Within thirty (30) days after the City approves the Work, the Artist shall prepare and
submit to the City detailed working drawings of the Work, together with such other graphic material as may
reasonably be requested by the City in order to permit the City to carry out structural design review and to
certify the compliance of the Work with any applicable statutes and ordinances. The City shall furnish to the
Artist all information, materials, and assistance required by the Artist in connection with said submission by
the Artist promptly on the request by the Artist for such information. Should the Structural Design Review find
that the Artist's work does not conform to safety and material standards, the Artist shall be required to make
the necessary changes at its own expense.
b. The City may require the Artist to make such revisions to the Work as are necessary for
the Work to comply with applicable statutes, ordinances, or regulations of any governmental regulatory agency
having jurisdiction over the project.
C. The City may also request revisions for other practical (non-aesthetic) reasons.
d. Within ten (10) days after the receipt of the Artist's submission pursuant to Section 1.3,
the City shall notify the Artist of its approval or disapproval of such submission and of all revisions made in the
Work as a result thereof. Revisions made pursuant to this Agreement become a part of the Work.
1.3 Execution of the Work.
a. After written approval of the submissions and revisions made pursuant to Section 1.2,
1 the Artist shall furnish to the City a schedule for completion of fabrication and delivery of the Work, including a
schedule for the submission of progress reports, if any. After written approval of the schedule by the City, the
Artist shall design, fabricate, and deliver the Work in accordance with that schedule. The schedule may only
be amended by written agreement between the City and the Artist.
b. The City shall have the right to review the Work at reasonable times during fabrication.
The Artist shall submit progress reports to the City in accordance with the schedule provided for in Section
1.3(a).
AGREEMENT FOR ARTWORK - 1
C. The Artist shall complete the fabrication and delivery of the Work in substantial
conformity with the Work.
d. In the event the services of the Artist are integrated into, combined, or otherwise
coordinated with services by third parties not within the control of the Artist, the Artist shall not be responsible
for that third party services. If proper execution of the Artist's work depends upon the work of the City or a
third party, the Artist shall, prior to proceeding with the work, promptly report to the City any apparent
discrepancies or defects in the third party's work that renders it unsuitable for proper execution. Any costs
incurred as a result of the defective work shall be borne by the party responsible for the discrepancy or defect.
1.4 Delivery and Installation.
a. The Artist shall notify the City in writing when fabrication of the Work is complete and
ready for delivery and the Artist shall deliver the completed Work for installation in compliance with
procedures approved by the City pursuant to Section 1.3.
1.5 Post-Installation.
a. The Artist shall be available at those times agreed between the City and the Artist to
attend any inauguration or presentation ceremonies relating to the Work. The City shall use its best efforts to
arrange publicity for the completed Work.
b. Upon completion, the Artist shall provide written instructions for appropriate maintenance
and preservation of the Work.
1.6 Final Acceptance.
a. The Artist shall advise the City in writing when all services required prior to those
described in Section 1.5(b) have been completed in substantial comormity with the Work.
b. When the City determines that the work contemplated in this Agreement is complete, the
City shall notify the Artist of its final acceptance of the Work.
1.7 Risk of Loss. The risk of loss or damage to the Work shall be borne by the Artist until final
acceptance by the City, and the Artist shall protect the Work from loss or damage until final acceptance;
except that the risk of loss or damage shall be borne by the City prior to final acceptance while the Work is in
the actual custody, control, or supervision of the City; provided, that the Artist shall bear the risk of loss and
damage of the Work due to structural or design defects at all times including the warranty period.
1.8 Indemnity by City. Each party shall defend, indemnify, and hold the other harmless for losses
attributed to each party's own comparative negligence.
1.9 Title. Title to the Work shall pass to the City upon final acceptance.
1.10 Ownership Df Documents, Models. Upon final acceptance, all studies, drawings, designs,
maquettes, and models prepared and submitted under this Agreement shall be returned to the Artist and shall
belong to the Artist. The City may select and the Artist shall convey to the City one of the original drawings
submitted pursuant to section 1.2 as part of the Work, the City representing that such drawing(s) will be used
by it solely for exhibition. At the request of the City, the Artist agrees to inan the City studies, drawings, and
maquettes for use in exhibits of display and the Artist will not unreasonably withhold its consent.
ARTICLE 2. COMPENSATION, PAYMENT SCHEDULE, AND EXPENSES.
2.1 Compensation and Payment Schedule. The Artist shall be paid for Work only as provided in this
section. Each payment shall constitute full compensation for all work performed and services rendered
including all incidentals necessary to complete the Work. If state sales tax is due, the City will pay that
amount owing to the Artist who shall be responsible to collect and report those taxes to the State. Total
payment, including all expenses and sales tax, if any, shall not exceed the surn of$35,000. Payments will be
made as follows:
Payment of 17 500 Upon both parties' execution of this Agreement.
Payment of$17,500 Within thirty (30) days from the date of final acceptance
2.2 Artist's Expenses. The Artist shall be responsible for the payment of all mailing or shipping
charges on submissions to the City, the costs of transporting the Work to the site, and the costs of all travel by
the Artist and the Artist's agents and employees necessary for the proper performance of the services required
under this Agreement.
ARTICLE 3. TIME OF PERFORMANCE.
3.1 Duration. Time is of the essence in the Artist's performance of this Agreement. The services set
forth in Article 1 shall be completed in accordance with the schedule for completion of the Work pursuant to
Section 1.2.
3.2 Early Completion of Artist Services. The Artist shall bear the transportation and storage costs
resulting from the completion of Artist services hereunder prior to the time provided in the schedule for
completion.
3.3 Time Extensions. The City shall grant a reasonable extension of time to the Artist in the event
there is a delay on the part of the City in performing its obligations under this Agreement or in completing the
underlying capital project.
ARTICLE 4, WARRANTIES.
4.1 Warranties of Title. In addition to the warranty set forth in paragraph 1.1(c), the Artist also
warrants that: (a) the Work is solely the result of the artistic effort of the Artist, (b) except as otherwise
disclosed in writing to the City, the Work is unique and original and does not infringe upon any copyright; (c)
that the Work or a duplicate thereof, has not been accepted for sale elsewhere; and (d) the Work is free and
clear of any liens from any source whatsoever.
4.2 Warranties of Quality and Condition. In addition to the warranty set forth in paragraph 1.1(c),
Artist represents and warrants, except as otherwise disclosed to the City in writing in connection with
submission of the Work pursuant to Section 1.1(b) and 1.2(c), that: (a) the execution and fabrication of the
Work will be performed in a workmanlike manner; (b) the Work, as fabricated and installed, will be free of
defects in material and workmanship, Including any defects that would cause or accelerate detenoration of the
Work; and (c) reasonable maintenance of the Work will not require procedures substantially in excess of those
described in the maintenance recommendations to be submitted by the Artist to the City hereunder.
The warranties described in this Section 4.2 shall survive for a period of five (5) years as
outlined in Section 1.1(c), after the City's final acceptance of the Work. The City shall give notice to the Artist
A/"CCAACAIT CnD ADTAInDV _ '2
of any observed breach with reasonable promptness. The Artist shall, at the request of the City, and at no
cost to the City, cure reasonably and promptly the breach of any warranty and Artist's cure will be consistent
with professional conservation standards (including, for example, cure by means of repair or refabrication of
the Work).
ARTICLE 5. INSURANCE. Artist shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement,insurance of
the types and in the amounts described in Exhibit B, attached and incorporated by this reference. '
ARTICLE 6. REPRODUCTION RIGHTS.
61 Retention of Rights and Issuance of License. The Artist retains all rights it may be entitled to
pursuant to the Copyright Act of 1976, 17 U.S.C. § 101, et sea., and all other rights in and to the Work except
ownership and possession, and except as such rights are limited by this Section 6.1. Because the parties
intend that the Work in its final dimension shall be unique, the Artist shall not make any additional exact
duplicate reproductions of the Work or permit others to do so except by written permission of the City.
6.2 Recognition of City. The Artist shall use her best efforts to give a credit reading substantially,
"an original work owned and commissioned by the City of Kent," in any public showing under the Artist's
control of reproductions of the Work.
6.3 Intellectual Property. If for any reason the proposed design is not implemented,all rights to the
proposed Artist's artwork shall be recognized as the Artist's intellectual property.
ARTICLE 7. ARTIST'S RIGHTS.
7.1 Maintenance. The City shall take reasonable steps to assure that the Work is maintained and
protected. The City shall take into account the instructions and recommendations of the Artist and shall take '
reasonable steps to protect and maintain the Work in its original condition.
7.2 Repairs and Restoration.
a. The City shall have the right to determine, after consultation with a professional
conservator, when and if repairs and restorations to the Work will be made. The City may, at its option,
consult with the Artist regarding the aesthetics of all repairs and restorations.
b. All repairs and restorations shall be made in accordance with recognized principles of
conservation.
7.3 Alteration of the Work or of the Site.
a. The City agrees that it will not alter, modify, or change the Work without first attempting
to obtain the prior written approval of the Artist.
b. The City shall employ its good faith efforts to notify the Artist of any proposed alteration
of the site that would affect the intended character and appearance of the Work, to consult with the Artist in
the planning and execution of any alteration, and to make a reasonable effort to maintain the integrity of the
Work.
C. Nothing in this Section 7.3 shall preclude any right of the City: (1) to remove the Work
from public display or (2) to sell or destroy the Work for any reason. If the City at any time decides to sell or
destroy the Work, it shall, by written notice to the Artist's last known address to the City, offer the Artist a
AraFFMFNT FOR ARTWORK - 4
easonable opportunity to purchase or recover the Work pursuant to Washington State law for the disposition
if property and applicable local ordinances, policies, or rules relating to the disposition of City personal
�roperty.
7.4 Artist's Address. The Artist shall notify the City of changes in address. The failure to do so, if
such failure prevents the City from locating the Artist, shall be deemed a waiver by the Artist of the right
subsequently to enforce those provisions of this Article 7.
Is
7.5 Surviving Covenants. The covenants and obligations set forth in this Article 7 shall be binding
�upon the parties, their heirs, legatees, executors, administrators, assigns, transferees, and all their successors
in interest, and the City's covenants do attach and run with the Work.
ARTICLE S. ARTIST AS INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR.
The Artist shall perform all Work under this Agreement as an independent contractor and not as an
*agent or an employee of the City. The Artist shall not be supervised by any employee of the City nor shall the
•Artist exercise supervision over any employee or official of the City.
ARTICLE 9. ASSIGNMENT, TRANSFER, SUBCONTRACTING.
9.1 Written Consent. Neither the City nor the Artist shall assign or transfer an interest in this
Agreement without the prior written consent of the other; provided, however, that claims for money due or to
become due from the City under this Agreement may be assigned to a financial institution without approval.
9.2 Subcontracting. The Artist may not subcontract the Work.
ARTICLE 10. TERMINATION.
Either party may terminate this Agreement upon giving the other party not less than thirty (30) days
written notice as provided in Section 11.4 of this Agreement.
ARTICLE 11. MISCELLANEOUS.
I11.1 Recyclable Materials. Pursuant to Chapter 3.80 of the Kent City Code, the City requires its
contractors and consultants to use recycled and recyclable products whenever practicable. A price preference
may be available for any designated recycled product.
11.2 Non-Waiver of Breach. The failure of the City to insist upon strict performance of any of the
covenants and agreements contained in this Agreement, or to exercise any option conferred by this Agreement
in one or more instances shall not be construed to be a waiver or relinquishment of those covenants,
agreements or options, and the same shall be and remain in full force and effect.
11.3 Resolution of Disputes and Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed
in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. If the parties are unable to settle any dispute,
difference or claim arising from the parties' performance of this Agreement, the exclusive means of resolving
that dispute, difference or claim, shall only be by filing suit exclusively under the venue, rules and jurisdiction
of the King County Superior Court, King County, Washington, unless the parties agree in writing to an
alternative dispute resolution process. In any claim or lawsuit for damages arising from the parties'
performance of this Agreement, each party shall pay all its legal costs and attorney's fees incurred in
defending or bringing such claim or lawsuit, in addition to any other recovery or award provided by law;
ArMP=LACRM CnD ADTU/r101e _ S
provided, however, nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to limit the City's right to indemnification
under Section 1.8 of this Agreement.
11.4 Written Notice. All communications regarding this Agreement shall be sent to the parties at the
addresses listed on the signature page of the Agreement, unless notified to the contrary. Any written notice
hereunder shall become effective three (3) business days after the date of mailing by registered or certified
mail, and shall be deemed sufficiently given if sent to the addressee at the address stated in this Agreement or
such other address as may be hereafter specified in writing.
11.5 Assignment. Any assignment of this Agreement by either party without the written consent of
the non-assigning party shall be void. If the non-assegning party gives its consent to any assignment, the
terms of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect and no further assignment shall be made without
additional written consent.
11.6 Modification. No waiver, alteration, or modification of any of the provisions of this Agreement
shall be binding unless in writing and signed by a duly authorized representative of the City and Vendor.
11.7 Entire Agreement. The written provisions and terms of this Agreement, together with any
Exhibits attached hereto, shall supersede all prior verbal statements of any officer or other representative of
the City, and such statements shall not be effective or be construed as entering into or forming a part of or
altering in any manner this Agreement. All of the above documents are hereby made a part of this
Agreement. However, should any language in any of the Exhibits to this Agreement conflict with any language
contained in this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail.
11.8 Compliance with Laws. The Vendor agrees to comply with all federal,state, and municipal laws,
rules, and regulations that are now effective or in the future become applicable to Vendor's business,
equipment, and personnel engaged in operations covered by this Agreement or accruing out of the
performance of those operations.
11.9 Heirs and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the ,
City and the Artist and their respective heirs, personal representative, successors and permitted assigns.
IN WITNESS, the parties below execute this Agreement,which shall become effective on the
last date entered below.
ARTIST: CITY:
SEATTLE SOLSTICE, L.L.C. CITY OF KENT
By: By:
(signature) (signature)
Print Name: Stuart Kendall Print Name: Suzette Cooke
Its Owner Its Mayor
(title)
DATE: DATE:
AGREEMENT FOR ARTWORK - 6
NOTICES TO BE SENT TO: NOTICES TO BE SENT TO:
ARTIST: CITY OF KENT:
Stuart Kendall Mr. Perry Brooks
Seattle Solstice LLC City of Kent Parks and Community Svcs Dept.
7500 Fifth Avenue South 220 Fourth Avenue South
Seattle, WA 98108 Kent, WA 98032
(206) 763-0221 (telephone) (253) 856-5114 (telephone)
(206) 763-0277 (facsimile) (253) 856-6050 (facsimile)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Kent Law Department
i
1
1
1
i
1
i
i
r
AGREEMENT FOR ARTWORK - 7
EXHIBIT A
July 19, 2006
TO: Perry Brooks
Kent Parks Department
City of Kent,Washington
RE: Ball base for new City of Kent park: Contract between the city of Kent or it's agent
and Seattle Solstice LLC.
The following letter agreement concerts the design, engineering, fabrication and delivery
of the base socket will)plastic surrounds required for the approximately 62" diameter
floating sphere which is being donated by the Rotaty Chubs of Kent in association with
Seattle Solstice, LLC.
1. FORM: A base socket with a plastic surround, engineered and fabricated to t
support the floating"ball" (sphere)which will be supplied by others.
2. SIZE: Approximately 56.25" in Diameter by 25 50" inches high. These figures
are subject to a plushninus tolerance of 8%. Actual as built dunensions will be
available by August 1, 2006 at which time drawings to affected parties will be
released.
3. MATERIAL: Reinforced,banded cast concrete with a machined UHMW
polyethylene inner liner and an ABS plastic surround per Portico's specifications
for material, dimensions and color.
4. WEIGHT: Approximately 2800 lbs. i
5. MECHANICAL AND STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS: The base will be cast in
ferro cement with reinforcing steel, lilting eyes, water delivery entry points and a
polyethylene liner, secured to the concrete via cast in place stainless hardware. A
12"wide stainless steel compression band will surround the top of the cylindrical
side. The lifting eyes will penetrate a temporary socket cover. Seattle Solstice
will remove both the lifting eyes and the cover when the sphere is seated. The
ABS plastic surround will be attached to the base via stainless steel assemblies
and hardware.
6. TOTAL PRICE: $38,080.00 This price includes state and local sales taxes,
design, engineering, fabrication, insurance and delivery of the base to the site
along with supervision as required by the City of Kent's contractor for its
installation.
7. TIME OF DELIVERY: Delivery of the base will be at the option of the
Contractor, but no sooner than September 15, 2006.
8. LAW: The terms of this agreement will be governed by Washington State Law.
9. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF PAYMENT: At the time of approval and
signing of this contract, 50% of the contract sum will be due and payable to
Seattle Solstice in order to begin the work. The final 50% of the contract sum
will be due and payable within thirty(30) days of satisfactory completion of the
installation of the base at the City of Kent's park site site. All payments are to be
made by the City of Kent or by Their Designated Representative to Seattle
Solstice, LIX.
10. WARRANTY: Seattle Solstice guarantees the socket base to be free of any
defects in material or workmanship. However Seattle Solstice will not be liable
for any damage after the installation of the base socket which might occur as a
result of accidents or mishandling by personnel working or recreating in the area,
Seattle Solstice will provide a full five-year warranty—parts and labor---on the
base socket and we will be happy to negotiate a further limited warranty and/or
maintenance agreement for the entire base socket and sphere with the City of
Kent once the installation is commissioned and accepted.
This contract is the entire agreement between the parties.
If the above meets your approval,kindly sign and return the enclosed copy of this
contract along with your check for the initial payment.
Stuart Kendall, Seattle Solstice,LLC
City of Kent's Authorized Representative
Approved (Date)
r�
EXHIBIT B
INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR
CONSTRUCTION AND SERVICE CONTRACTS
Insurance
The Contractor shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement, insurance
against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may artse from or in
connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Contractor, their agents,
representatives, employees or subcontractors.
A. Minimum Scope of Insurance
Contractor shall obtain insurance of the types described below:
1. Automobile Ltability insurance covering all owned, non-owned,hired
and leased vehicles. Coverage shall be written on insurance Services
Office (ISO) form CA 00 01 or a substitute form providing equivalent
liability coverage. If necessary,the policy shall be endorsed to
provide contractual liability coverage.
2. Commercial General Liability insurance shall be written on ISO
occurrence form CG 00 01 and shall cover liability arising from
premises, operations, independent contractors, products-completed
operations, personal injury and advertising injury, and liability
assumed under an insured contract. The Connnercral General Liabtltty_
insurance shall be endorsed to provide the Aggregate Per Project
Endorsement LSO form CG 25 03 11 85. There shall be no
endorsement or modification of the Commercial General Liability
insurance for liability arising from explosion, collapse or underground
property damage. The City shall be named as an insured under the
Contractor's Commercial General Liability insurance policy with
respect to the work performed for the Ctty using ISO additional
insured endorsement CG 20 10 11 85 or a substitute endorsement
providing equivalent coverage.
3. Workers' Compensation coverage as required by the Industrial
hlsurance laws of the State of Washington.
B. Minimum Amounts of Insurance
Contractor shall maintain the following insurance limits:
I. Automobile Liability insurance with a rninimum combined single limit
for bodily injury and property damage of $1,000,000 per accident
2. Commercial General Liability insurance shalt be wtitten witli limbs no
less than $1,000,000 each occurrence, $2,000,000 general aggregate
and a$2,000,000 products-completed operations aggregate Britt.
EXHIBIT B (Continued )
C. Other Insurance Provisions
The insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions
for Automobile Liability and Commercial General Liability insurance:
1. The Contractor's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respect the City.
Any Insurance, self-insurance, or insurance pool coverage maintained by the City
shall be excess of the Contractor's insurance and shall not contribute with it.
2. The Contractor's insurance shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be
cancelled by etthei party, except after thirty(30) days prior written notice by certified
mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City.
i3. The City of Kent shall be named as an additional insured on all policies (except
Professional Liability) as respects work performed by or on behalf of the contractor
and a copy of the endorsement nailing the City as additional insured shall be attached
to the Certificate of Insurance. The City reserves the right to receive a certified copy
of all required insurance policies. The Contractor's Commercial General Liability
insurance shall also contain a clause stating that coverage shall apply separately to
each insured against wham claim is made or suit is brought, except with respects to
the limits of the insurer's liability.
D. Acceptability of Insurers
Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of not less than
ANII.
E. Verification of Coverage
Contractor shall furnish the City with original certificates and a copy of the amendatory
endorsements, including but not necessarily limited to the additional insured
endorsement, evidencing the insurance requirements of the Contractor before
commencement of the work.
F. Subcontractors
IContractor shall include all subcontractors as insureds under its policies or shall furnish
separate certificates and endorsements for each subcontractor All coverages for
subcontractors shall be subject to all of the same insurance requirements as stated herein
for the Contractor.
r
1
Kent City Council Meeting
Date August 1, 2006
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: PROPOSED LID 359, 116TH AVENUE —RESOLUTION
SETTING HEARING DATE
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Adoption of Resolution No. setting
September 5, 2006, as the hearing date on proposed formation of Local Improvement
District 359.
1 The city is planning to widen 116`h Avenue SE between Kent Kangley Road and S.
256`h Street, which is part of the 2771h Corridor that has not yet been fully improved to
city standards The project will widen 116`h Avenue SE from two lanes to five lanes
and will include bike lanes, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, a new storm water system, a new
street illumination system, and will underground existing overhead power and
telephone wires. The total estimated cost and expense of the improvements is
$6,702,000. Approximately $4,686,802 of that cost and expense will be paid by the
city or through the use of grants and the remainder, roughly $2,015,197, will be
assessed against the properties specially benefited by the improvements in the proposed
local improvement district
3. EXHIBITS: Tim LaPorte's memorandum, dated 7/17/06 and resolution
4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. FISCAL IMPACT
Expenditure? N/A Revenue? N/A
Currently in the Budget? Yes No
If no:
Unbudgeted Expense. Fund Amount $
Unbudgeted Revenue: Fund Amount $
6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 6P
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
400 Larry R. Blanchard, Public A Vorks Director
•
` K EN T Phone 253-356-5500
W A S H I N G T O N Fax 253-856-6500
Address 220 Fouith Avenue S.
Kent,WA 98032-5895
Date: July 10, 2006
I To: Chair Debbie Raplee and Public Works Committee Members
PW Comnuttee Meeting Date: July 17, 2006
From: Tun LaPorte, Engineering Design Manager
Through: Larry Blanchard,Public Works Director
Subject: Proposed L.I.D. —116"'Ave S. E. Street and Utility Improvements (Kent
Kangley Road to S. E. 256th Street)
Motion: ■ Required ❑ Not Required ❑ For Infonnation Only
Recommend adoption of the Resolution of Intent setting a public hearing date on the
formation of a street and utility L.I.D. for the 19 properties shown on the attached map.
r
Will document be required?
■ Ordinance ■ Resolution ❑ Agreement ❑ Contract
❑ Policy ❑ SOP's ❑ Other
1 Governing Policies Procedures Rules & Regulations:
RC W's
' BACKGROUND 1 HISTORY: As you maybe aware the City has been planning to widen 116th
Avenue SE between Kent Kangley Road and S 256th Street. This section of 1161h Avenue is
part of the 277d' Corridor which has not yet been fully improved to City standards. The project
1 has been on the City's Six Year Transportation Improvement Program and is known as the S
277`h Corridor Extension. Traffic studies show that traffic demand will continue to increase on
this section of 116'h Avenue. The roadway facilitates traffic from SE 256`' Street to the already
improved portion of the 272"d Street Corridor south of Kent Kangley Road.
The project will widen the street from two lanes to five and will include bike lanes each way,
curb, gutters, sidewalk, a new stone water system, a new street illumination system, and would
underground the existing overhead power and telephone wires. Also included is widening on
Kent Kangley Road near the intersection with 116`h Street. City Engineering staff have
Propwol LID 1160 AwIPWC6..wnUduNPNgcdw
N
competed for a state grant to help pay for the costs and were ultimately successful in obtaining a
$1.9 million dollar grant for the project.
To complete the project the City needs to widen the right-of-way to accommodate the wider
roadway. Following a typical process the City hired an outside appraiser and property negotiator
to acquire the strips of private property needed adjacent to the roadway. During the process of
negotiation with the property owners in this area to acquire these property strips it became
evident that nearly all of the property owners wanted to have sewer service installed, and again
nearly all of the property owners wanted to either sell their property to a developer or redevelop
the property themselves.
To develop individual properties a developer would have to install the necessary sanitary sewers, '
storm sewers, water lines, storm water detention and build typical street frontage improvements
similar to what you would see in other private residential developments throughout the City. ,
The grant the City obtained cannot be used for the utility extensions that would benefit
individual private properties, but only for the general roadway. Because the properties have
requested these utility e xtensions to their private property to allow development to occur, the
City investigated the best way for the property owners to finance the added cost and
recommended a local improvement district. One of the property owners circulated all L.I.D
petition and collected signatures from a number of property owners. In addition, there are two
other parcels which have signed L I D. no protest covenants for street improvements. The cost
of adding the utilities and extending the sewer, water lines, and street frontage unprovements
was estimated. Information was sent to all of the property owners within the proposed L.I.D
including the project description, L.I.D. information and the proposed assessment.
Subsequently, we met individually with all but three of the property owners which declined the
invitation . Nearly all of the property owners expressed interest in developing their property or
eventually selling to a developer. During these meetings we discussed the potential for
development of each property owners property and the need for street and utility improvements
to allow development to occur.
An individual property owner could extend the sanitary sewer to their property and pay the full
cost up front, however, for most cases this would not be economically feasible. With the L.I D.
everybody serviced shares in the cost. It also make sense to install the utilities prior to the street
construction to avoid cutting the new street and the associated extra costs at a later date. The
City has obtained grant funding and has other funds to reduce the cost of the street ,
improvements. Including the L.I.D. improvements in the City project increases the economy of
scale as larger projects usually receive better prices which also reduces the cost. Also, the L.I.D.
provides a 15 year payment plan at a low rate of interest.
The response to the proposal was very positive. Therefore, the next step in the formation process
is for City Council to pass the Resolution of Intent scheduling the formation public hearing.
PROPOSED L.I.D. IMPROVEMENTS FOR 116Ti AVE SE
Sanitary Sewer: '
The project consists of installing an eight-inch diameter sanitary sewer collection system
complete with manholes Six-inch diameter side sewer stubs from the main line to the property
lines at the street are also included. For properties where future multiple connections are
Propmrd LID Ile Ane1PWComm,f1mWct�,Pagcd6c
anticipated, the appropriate number of stubs are included. Where there is anticipated significant
future development, an eight inch stub is included.
Water:
A City water main is already located within 116`h Ave SE and the existing houses are already
connected, however, for future development of the properties, additional connections to the
water main will be required. To avoid cutting the new street, stubs and services to accommodate
future development will be installed to the edge of the right of way. This work includes one inch
service lines for anticipated future lots or where required, an eight inch stub for a main extension.
Roadway:
The roadway improvements include widening to 5 lanes ( 2 lanes each direction with a center
1 turn lane), bike lanes, curb and gutter, sidewalk, channelrzation, signing, storm drainage and
detention including stubs to adjacent properties as well as street lighting, street trees and
undergromnding of overhead power and telephone wires. These improvements include the
roadway frontage improvements typically required for development.
NEED FOR THE, IMPROVEMENTS:
The proposed L.I.D. improvements are needed for development as discussed above. In addition,
sanitary sewer is needed for other reasons.
The project area is an older residential area with septic systems. All residential lots except one
I have homes. It is not known how many existing septic systems are technically in a state of
failure if any. However, we did receive input regarding septic problems. Due to the age of the
septic systems and the potential for problems, the sewer is a desirable improvement, particularly
with the adjacent creek. Usually it is difficult and expensive to repair septic problems, especially
with today's stneter standards Sanitary sewers are usually the only feasible, economical and
long term method for addressing these potential problems, especially when numerous property
owners in a neighborhood support sewer installation as is the case with this proposal.
The Department of Public health has told us that the life expectancy of a septic system is twenty
' to thirty years depending on use and maintenance and that they are a short term disposal method
until public sewers become available. These homes were built in the 1950's and 1960's, with
some being older, therefore the project area has exceeded this time frame. These systems are at
or are near the end of their useful life The cost of septic repairs may also be as high as
converting to public sewers. The latest state codes make septic repairs more difficult and
expensive than in the past.
The soil type within the project area is rated poor for septic system use. According to the Soil
Conservation Service (US Dept. of Agriculture) soil survey for King County, the soil type as
mapped is rated "severe hinitation" (worst case) for septic dram fields. The soil series is
designated as Alderwood gravelly sandy loam This soil exhibits very low permeability below a
depth of 24 to 40 inches and has a seasonal high water table less than 4 foot depth. Effluent and
I drainage move laterally over the shallow imperious layers. Effluent may come to tine surface
resulting in odor.
In addition to the need for sewers in this area to replace the old septic systems, there are
environmental concerns. Septic systems are a threat to water quality, fish and wildlife and public
health within the drainage basin for this area. A stream tributary to Soosette Creek runs through
Proposed LID Ile A,a PWC.....f eUU.nPage doc
the project area. There is also a wetland along one portion of the stream Septic seepage and
runoff can degrade water quality in the stream and wetland.
FUNDING:
The proposed project funding is as follows:
T.I.B. Grant $1,945,200
Environmental Mitigation Agreements
(for the 277"' Corridor) $1,183,206
Drainage Funds $ 500,000
Other Street Funds $1,058,397
Local Improvement District $2,015,197 '
TOTAL PROJECT COST $6,702,000
The L.I.D. component assessments are as follows:
Street $ 410,391.97
Sanitary Sewer $1,266,911.13
Water Stubs $ 163,726.04
Storm Detention $ 174,168.45
TOTAL $2,015,197.59
There are no City properties within this L.I.D.
METHOD OF ASSESSMENT:
The proposed assessment for each component of the L.LD. was distributed as follows: 1
Street: These costs were distributed by square footage using the zone and termini method. The
assessment rate decreases with each 100 foot zones back from the street frontage to the rear of
the property. For this project there are up to 7 zones. The zone rate for the first 100 foot strip of
each parcel is seven times the rate of the seventh zone from the frontage, the second zone from ,
the frontage is six time the rate of the seventh zone and so on.
Most of the property within this L.I.D. is zoned single family (SR6 and SR8). Due to the
different densities of single family and the fact that the benefit relates to the number of
developable lots that can be obtained, the single f amily property assessments were c alcu I ated
based on the number of developable lots. Each parcel was reviewed to determine the minimum
number of lots that could be obtained through a short plat or full plat. The total cost from the
zone and termini distribution for all of the single family zoned properties was distributed on a per
future lot basis. The assessment for three other parcels zoned multiple family (MRM) and
office-mixed use (O-MU) are per the zone and termini calculation.
Sanitary Sewer: These assessments were calculated in the same manner as the street
assessments described above.
Water Stubs: Each property is assessed for the cost for the actual number of new one inch
water services or for an eight inch stub from the existing water main as required to fully develop
the property.
Pr M,r d LID 116'Ale1PINConrm/ne¢Lfc/ronPrzg<rloc ,
Storm Detention: The 2 properties that are being assessed for storm detention will share a
portion of the capacity of the City's proposed detention pond for the road project. A portion of
this cost is assessed to these 2 properties (assessment numbers 8&9) based on an estimate of the
cost to construct a pond to serve just these two properties. This cost is distributed based on the
number of lots that can be developed for these 2 parcels.
PAYMENT OF ASSESSMENTS;
Upon Council passing the Ordinance confirming the Final Assessment Roll, there is a 30-day
period in which any portion or all of the assessment can be paid without interest charges. After
the 30-day period, the balance is paid over a ten-year period wherein each year's payment is one-
fifteenth of the principal plus interest on the unpaid balance. The market determines the interest
rate at the time the L.I.D. bonds are sold to the public.
SUPPORT FOR LID 359:
To defeat an L.I.D. proposal by protest, there must be protest from property owners representing
60% or more of the proposed L.I.D. assessments. The total project cost for calculating protest
percentage is $2,015,197.59 The 60% protest amount would be $1,209,119.
As indicated previously, there appears to be substantial property owner support for the project
with substantially less than 60% protest. Should this level of support continue through the public
hearing process, it will then be a City Council decision whether or not to proceed with the L.LD
formation and approve the L I.D. formation ordinance.
SEPA:
The SEPA process for environmental review has been completed for this project and we are
ready to move forward.
SUMMARY; Property owners have petitioned for and have shown interest in forming a street
Iand utility L.I.D. to obtain public improvements necessary for development of their properties.
RECOMMENDATIONS: Recommend adoption of the Resolution of I ntent setting a public
hearing date for the foration of a street and utility L.I.D. for the 19 properties shown on the
attached map.
Proposed LID Ile Aw1PWCammweM&mmPage dm
I I !
Fill
SE 258TH ST
�
T
I
1
1
I � I
I 1
1 I
O ! I
1
1 I
N�
I wl OS
>I
I!_I
. I
PR PAID MITIGATION fES 1
\ I I
I I
! , 1
I I
I I
I
� � 1
1
t I L
I
! j SE 254TH PL
O
1 f-
I j t0
I � I
I I
I
I I
I
O 1
� 1 I
1
I
I I
1
\\ O I
\ \`N I I 15
�"\\``\\`
\ \ 1 1
A
S
kN
i �-'�
NNNN \
c..cmccama .
cevu,CITY zOFNICENT aten,wa.aeoaz 1 ���
UD ASSESSMENT MAP
116M AYENUE SE
1
lO = LID ASSESSMENT NUMBER
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION of the city council of the city of ,
Kent, Washington, declaring its intention to order the
construction of roadway improvements, sanitary sewer
improvements, water main improvements, and a storm
water detention pond; to create a local improvement
district to assess a part of the cost and expense of
carrying out those improvements against the properties
specially benefited by the project; and to notify all
persons who desire to object to the formation of this
local improvement district and its attendant
improvements to appear and present their objections at
a hearing before the city council to be held on
September 5, 2006.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT,
WASHINGTON, as follows:
SECTION 1. The city council of the city of Kent, Washington, intends to L
order the improvement of the properties within the area described in Exhibit A,
attached and incorporated, by the construction of roadway improvements, sanitary
sewer improvements, water main improvements, and a storm water detention
pond, as more fully described in Exhibit B, attached and incorporated.
All these improvements shall conform with the plans and specifications
prepared by the city's Director of Public Works and may be modified as long as that '
modification does not affect the purpose of the improvements.
SECTION 2. The total estimated cost and expense of the improvements is ,
declared to be $6,702,000; approximately $4,686,802 40 of that cost and expense
to be paid by the city and from grants, and the balance (an estimated
1 Resolution of Intent — LID 359
t
' $2,015,197.60) to be borne by and assessed against the property specially
benefited by the improvements. This proposed local improvement district will
tinclude, as nearly as practicable, all property specially benefited by the
improvements Actual assessments may vary from estimated assessments so long
as those assessments do not exceed the increased true and fair value that the
improvements add to the property.
SECTION 3 The city clerk is authorized and directed to give notice of the
adoption of this resolution and of the date, time, and place fixed for the public
hearing to each owner or reputed owner of any lot, tract, parcel of land, or other
property within the proposed local improvement district by mailing appropriate
notice at least fifteen (15) days before the date fixed for the public hearing to the
owners or reputed owners of the property as shown on the rolls of the King County
Assessor at the address shown on the rolls, as required by law.
This resolution also shall be published in its entirety in at least two (2)
consecutive issues of the official newspaper of the city, the date of the first
publication to be at least fifteen (15) days prior to the date fixed for the public
hearing.
SECTION 4. All persons who wish to comment in support of or object to
the formation of the proposed local improvement district and its attendant
improvements are notified to appear and present those comments or objections at
' a hearing before the city council to be held in the council chambers in the Kent
City Hall located at 220 4th Avenue South in Kent, Washington, at 7:00 p.m. on
tSeptember 5, 2006, which time and place are fixed for hearing all matters relating
to the improvements, for receiving all comments and objections, and for
determining the method of payment for the improvements. All persons who wish
to object should appear and present their objections at that hearing. Any person
' who wishes to file a written protest with the city council may do so within thirty
(30) days after the date of passage of the ordinance ordering the improvements in
' the event the local improvement district is formed. The written protest should be
signed by the property owner(s) and should include the legal description of the
property for which the protest is filed and should be delivered to the city clerk.
t
2 Resolution of Intent — LID 359
t
SECTION 5 The city's Director of Public Works is directed to submit to the '
city council on or prior to September 5, 2006, all data and information required by
law to be submitted.
Passed at a regular open public meeting by the city council of the city of
Kent, Washington, this 1st day of August, 2006.
Concurred in by the Mayor of the City of Kent this day of August,
2006.
SUZETTE COOKE, MAYOR
ATTEST:
BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
FOSTER PEPPER PLLC ,
Special Counsel and Bond Counsel
i
i
1
t
3 Resolution of Intent — LID 359
1
1
Exhibit A
L.I.D. Boundary Description
L.I.D. 359 — 116th Avenue S.E. Street and Utility Improvements
That portion of the northwest quarter of Section 28, Township 22 North, Range 5 East, W M.
and the northeast quarter of Section 29, Township 22 North, Range 5 East, W M., all in King
County, Washington, described as follows:
Commencing at the northeast corner of said Section 29; thence S00156'55"W, along the
east line of said Section 29, a distance of 660.21 feet to the southeast corner of the
northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of said Section 29 and
the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence N88003'55"W, along the south line of said
subdivision, 655.92 feet to the west line of the east half of the northeast quarter of the
northeast quarter of said Section 29; thence S00035'16"W, along said west line, 165.60 feet
to the south line of the north half of the north half of the south half of the east half of the
northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of said Section 29; thence S88006'42"E, along
said south line, 654.87 feet to the east line of the northeast quarter of said Section 29;
thence S00056'55"W, along said east line, 165.05 feet to the south line of the north half of
the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of said Section 29;
thence N88009'29"W, along said south line, 366.75 feet to the east line of the west 287.00
feet of the east half of the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of said Section 29;
thence S00035'16"W, along said east line, 330.74 feet to the south line of the northeast
quarter of the northeast quarter of said Section 29; thence N88015'05"W, along said south
line, 36 61 feet; thence SO1006'30"W 325 20 feet; thence N89001'18"E 178 31 feet; thence
1 S02040'13"W 181.41 feet to the northeasterly margin of SR 516 (a.k.a. Kent-Kangley
Highway); thence S61105'12"E, along said northeasterly margin, 259.70 feet to the east
line of said Section 29; thence continuing S61005'12"E, along said northeasterly margin,
580.16 feet to the east line of Lot 1, King County Short Plat, KCSP 382004R, recorded under
King County Recording Number 8509090500; thence N021117'22"E, along said east line,
227.16 feet; thence N87042'38"W, along the north line thereof, 203.15 feet to the
southwest corner of Lot 7 of Seven Oaks Terrace, as recorded in Volume 142 of Plats, pages
42 and 43, records of King County; thence N0201741"E, along the west line of said plat,
656.48 feet to the south line of the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of said
Section 28 and an angle point in the west line of said plat; thence N00057'50"E along the
' west line of Seven Oaks Division 1, as recorded in Volume 127 of Plats, pages 3 and 4,
records of King County, a distance of 660 20 feet to the south line of the northwest quarter
of the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of said Section 28; thence N88056'39"W
along said south line, 330 24 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
Exhibit A
1
Exhibit B '
Description of Improvements
L.I.D 359 — 1161" Avenue S.E. Street and Utility Improvements
Roadway Improvements:
The roadway improvements include widening to 5 lanes ( 2 lanes each direction with a
center turn lane), bike lanes, curb and gutter, sidewalk, channelization, signing, storm ,
drainage including stubs to the adjacent properties, street lighting, street trees and
undergrounding of overhead power and telephone wires Also included is widening on Kent
Kangley Road at the intersection with 116th Avenue to provide for additional turn lanes. The
project also includes the purchase of additional right of way to accommodate the widening.
ON FROM TO
116T" Ave S.E. Kent Kangley Road (SR 516) approximately 140 feet
south of S.E. 256th Street
(L I D. assessments are to
approximately 660 feet
south of S.E. 256th Street)
Kent Kangley Road approximately 300 feet west approximately 97D feet
of 116th Ave. S.E. east of 116th Ave. S.E.
(There are no street assessments along Kent Kangley Road.)
Sanitary Sewer Improvements:
The project consists of installing an eight-inch diameter sanitary sewer collection system
complete with manholes to service all properties within the L.I.D. boundary not currently
serviced by sanitary sewer. Six-inch diameter side sewer stubs from the main line to the
property lines at the street are also included For properties where future multiple
connections are anticipated, the appropriate number of stubs are included Where there is ,
anticipated significant future development, an eight inch stub is included.
Water Main Improvements:
Stubs and services from the existing water main to accommodate future development will
be installed to the edge of the right of way. This work includes one inch service lines for
anticipated future lots or where required, an eight inch stub for a main line extension.
Storm Water Detention:
A storm water detention pond will be constructed at the northeast corner of 116th Avenue
S.E. and S.E. 259th Place. Included is purchase of property for the pond.
Exhibit B
rCERTIFICATION
I, the undersigned, City Clerk of the City of Kent, Washington (the "City"), hereby
certify as follows:
1. The attached copy of Resolution No. (the "Resolution") is a full, true
and correct copy of an Resolution duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of
the City held at the regular meeting place thereof on August 1, 2006, as that Resolution
appears on the minute book of the City, and the Resolution will be in full force and effect
immediately following its adoption.
' 2. A quorum of the members of the City Council was present throughout the
meeting and a majority of those members present voted in the proper manner for the
adoption of the Resolution
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this day of August, 2006.
CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON
Brenda Jacober, City Clerk
50697468 1
Kent City Council Meeting
Date August 1, 2006
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: 2007-2012 SIX-YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM — SET HEARING DATE
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Set a hearing date of August 15, 2006, for
consideration of the 2007-2012 Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program.
The Draft 2007-2012 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) includes 38
projects with estimated project costs totaling $378,597,000.00. Six projects from the
2006-2011 TIP were dropped because they were completed or will be completed this
year Those include the Pacific Highway project, Kent Station Infrastructure, Kent
Transit Center Access Improvements, the South 277`h Street corridor bicycle path, and
the west leg of the South 228`h Street Corridor. Six new projects are added this year
with combined estimated project costs of$59,660,000. Including these projects in the
Six-Year TIP allows the City to begin looking for funding partners and apply for grants
to see if these projects will be feasible.
' 3. EXHIBITS: Draft 2007-2012 Six-Year TIP and Public Works Memorandum
4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
' 5. FISCAL IMPACT
Expenditure? _ Revenue?
Currently in the Budget? Yes X No
If no•
Unbudgeted Expense: Fund Amount $
Unbudgeted Revenue: Fund Amount $
6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 6Q
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
400 Larry R. Blanchard, Public Works Director
•
KENT Phone 253-856-5500
' W.sHI G_O Fax 253-356-o500
Address 220 Fourth Avenue S
Kent, WA 98032-5895
Date: July 10, 2006
To: Chair Debbie Raplee and Public Works Committee Members
PW Committee Meeting Date• July 17,2006
From: Steve Mullen, Transportation Engineering Manager
Through: Larry Blanchard, Public Works Director ItA
Subject: Draft 2007—2012 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program
Motion: ■ Required ❑ Not Required ❑ For Information Only
Recommend that Public Works Committee forward the Draft 2007-2012 Six-Year
Transportation Impro,ement Program (TIP) to the full Council and Recommend that
Council set date for a Public Hearing.
Will document be required?
■ Ordinance ❑ Resolution ❑ Agreement ❑ Contract
❑ Policy ❑ SOP's ❑ Other
Governing Policies Procedures Rules & Regulations:
RCW 35.77.010
Background/History: The Draft 2007-2012 Six Year Transportation Improvement Project has
' 6 new projects for a combined $59,660,000 Including these projects in our Six-Year TIP allows
the City to begin looking for funding partners and apply for grants to see if these projects will be
feasible.
Summary: The Draft 2007-2012 Six Year TIP includes 38 projects with estimated project costs
totaling $ 378,597,000.
' Recommendations: Recommend that Public Works Committee forward the Draft 2007-2012
Six Year Transportation Program (TIP) to Council and Recommend that Council set a date for a
' Public Hearing on the Draft TIP.
P IPxAhcl9Amnr5erplgeth'PfFCrxnmeve.Ac,aePugc doe
c � E V°
' Z 1'1
Q W L II r � ¢ ry C9 Y3
Y a = ^+ Z
I a W a W
r � > a r a
VE
4 -� I i�Air-µyyjy� ir.r ,�,�.r'•-""' i v '4
,A.>n�=-p �- f � � [fseomAf^Y wp»,•.r" '� � __`� ., .n[, e
} n� �. N .�. • r �Y
w
' --•`,Y^,J1s,f - � �- �''� - � ,[;», t 1, t I
S 1 ! Y�Sy`•'> _ H U� 1L"x frLUMY•w.w�,y�.:�YZIRsv.a¢x.�-Fl♦ � s. n[rz,f U
Fir "�. fly2.uim, za: t1',. ' L
r,r
I
' v� T .iMWtA*11 CI ` '�ryrnfxI _l'.'ytf.,•
�� _ uif[l fI Y.M1nri i. `t�p ir+r.^•'LV` r �',���Y.c^f IMi
(� [.f 5A2 Yj +d y•Tf •Ya,fn•i fir,
' n —t N a.,e,—r z ff l"" tifdr
.n� �
;d"`'a1.l„�� T f= ___,.. f j.�.J. 9 „f tv "�y tiyr—•�-"�_>'- 7y - , ,
y• '-+� 3; f��,":.»:� 'w,u.ar"i rJ'���".",-....!!--'-- {��,. �� « � c�,R.,--,-.P,......f.fs....�e'1" r.f ,.n'e r
�= l T x ' � 3m., 'utin<n.w [ f ,.,>�,�,: / S ��✓�?t•,t !!4V
li f.t4�� i `� _ n.««'u'"n`Y,"...."`ai"�i,_•�:}f'__,nA....yf,Ff,l i
4
F Y3 f z I V4
' � r .P R ; e..,,y:AS'tuua FY a'�+�n.,�,.dov-•m+me ui.y.,l�negFl if rrf.e [..�__. �..f l�'s:��,=�°:'S,r iii,� ii
16
1
CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON
SIX-YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM
2007 - 2012
♦�;� iii� CWd � � � C�`' yl "��Cis
die �
Mayor Suzette Cooke
' Larry R. Blanchard, KEN T
' Director of Public Works
1
i
CITY OF KENT i
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
2007 - 2012
1
Table of Contents Page(s) i
1. Resolution adoption the 2007-2012 Six Year TIP..........................0 i
2. Statement of Purpose..............................................................I i
3. Listing of the Projects..........................................................i-iv i
4. Map of the Projects............................................................map i
1
S. Project Descriptions.........................................................1 — 38
1
6 Contact Information..............................................................39
i
1
CITY OF KENT
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
' 2007-2012
PURPOSE
What is the Six Year Transportation Improvement Program(TIP)?
The Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is a short-range
planning document that is annually updated based on needs and policies identified
through a variety of sources. Project and Financial development involve interactions with
many groups and agencies at the local, regional, state and federal levels. It represents
Kent's current list of needed projects that may begin work in the next six years The
document also identifies secured or reasonably expected revenue sources for each of the
projects included in the TIP Typically, projects listed in the first three years of the
document are shown as having secured funding or there are reasonable expectations to
acquire those finds, while projects in the last three years can be partially funded and be
seeking funding partners. All projects are consistent with the City's adopted 2004
Comprehensive Plan.
Mandated by State Law
State law requires that each city develop a local TIP and that it be updated
annually (RCW 35.77 010) In order for cities to compete for transportation funding
grants from Federal and State soutces most granting agencies require that projects be
included in the TIP. Federal grant funded and regionally significant projects from the
first three years of the City's TIP are included in the Regional TIP, which is assembled
by the Puget Sound Regional Council for King, Kitsap, Pierce and Snohomish Counties.
The regional TIPS (RTIP) from around the state are then combined to form the State TIP
(STIP),* which is approved by the Governor and then submitted to the Federal Highway
Administration for their review and approval.
' *The State TIP (STIP) is a three-year, fiscally constrained and prioritized program of
transportation projects compiled from local and regional plans. Beginning tit July 2007, the
STIP is to change to a four-year document as described tit the Federal Safe, Accountable,
Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act — A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) Projects
listed in the STIP are the only projects that will be approved by the Federal Highway
Administration to utilize federal funds
1
CITY OF KENT
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
2007-2012
Project Project Name
Number Project Location and Extent
1. Clark Springs Watershed Pavement Rehabilitation
Kent Kangley Road at the Clark Springs Watershed)
2. South 2771h Street Corridor Extension
Widen 116"'Avenue SE fi-oin Kent Kangley Road(SR 516) to SE 256`h St
3. Kent Station Mitigation Projects
Widen Willis Street at 4`'Avenue and Central Avenue at Willis Street
4. Transportation Master Plan
Major update of the Kent 1984 Comprehensive Transportation Plan
5. South 228`h Street/Burlington Northern Santa 6e Railroad Grade
Grade separation crossing at Burlington Northern/Santa Fe Railroad
6. 84"' Avenue South Widening and Pavement Rehabilitation
SR 167 to South 212ii' Street
7. I-5/South 272"d Street Interchange Reconstruction—Phase I
Provide transit and HOV Direct Access between South 272"d St and 1-5
8. 72"d Avenue South Extension
South 20(1i'Street to South 196'1' Street
9. Smart Growth Initiative
Widen South Street near Lincoln Avenue and widen Willis at 2"d Ave South 1
10. Interurban Trail Crossings Signal Interconnect
West Meeker Street and West Sunth Street
11. SE 248"' Street improvements
116`i'Avenue Southeast to 132"d Avenue Southeast
12. 801h Avenue South Widening
South 1961i'Street to South 188"'Street
t
CITY OF KENT
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
2007-2012
Project Project Name
Number Project Location and Extent
13. Military Road South at Reith Road
Intersection Iniprovenient
14. South 228ih Street/Union Pacific Grade Separation
Grade separation crossing at Union Pacific Railroad
15. Southeast 256"' Street Widening, Phase II
SR 516(Relit Kangley Road) to 116"'Avenue SE
16. Central Avenue South Pavement Rehabilitation
Green River Bridge to East Willis Street (SR 516)
17. South 2281" Street Corridor—Phase Ili/South 224"' Street Extension
84`r'Avenue South to 104"'Avenue Southeast (Benson Rood)(SR515)
18. Willis Street (SR 516) Union Pacific Railroad Grade Separation
Grade separation crossing at Union Pacific Railroad(UPRR)
19. Willis Street(SR516)/Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad Grade
Separation
Grade separation crossing at Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad
20. Military Road Widening
South 272"d Street to South 240i" Street
21. South 2121h Street Union Pacific Railroad Grade Separation
Grade separation crossing at Union Pacific Railroad
22. South 212`h StreetBurlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad Grade
Separation
Grade separation crossing at Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad
23. West Meeker Street Widening—Phase I
64`1' Averure South to the Green River Bridge
24. West Meeker Street Widening—Phase II
SR 516 to the east side of the Green River, including a new bridge
�i
CITY OF KENT
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
2007-2012
Project Project Name
Number Project Location and Extent
25. 108"' Avenue SE Extension
SE Kent Kanglev Road(SR 516) to SE 256"'Street
26. South 272"d Street Widening—Phase II
Pacific Highhivy South to,11ilitat),Road South
27. SR 1811West Valley Highway/Washington Avenue Widening
Meeker Street north to approxunately the 218'" block
28. South 2081h Street Improvements
84ir'Avenue South to 9611' Wav South
29. 132"d Avenue Southeast Widening—Phase I
Southeast 288t" Street to Kent Kanglev Road(SR 516)
30. 132"d Avenue Southeast Widening—Phase II
Kent Kangley Road(SR 516) to Southeast 24811' Street
31. 132"d Avenue Southeast Widening—Phase III
Southeast 248'1' Street to Southeast 236"' Street
32. Southeast 256th Street Widening—Phase III
13211d Avenue Southeast to 148'h Avenue Southeast
33. South 196t"/192"d Street Corridor—Phase III
841h Avenue South (East Valley Highway) to 108"'Avenue SE(SR 515)
34. State Route 167 (SR 167) Widening
On,staff engineering and planning support of WSDOT project to widen
State Route 167 front SR 512 to South 180'h Street
35. Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements
Ongoing cit wide program to encourage the use of non-motorized
transportation modes and provide safe routes for schoolchildren
tit
I
I CITY OF KENT
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
S 2007-2012
Project Project Name
Number Protect Location and Extent
36. Guardrail and Safety Improvements
Ongoing citvwide program to elaninate potentially hazardous roadway
conditions
37. Community Based Circulating Shuttles
Ongoing citywide prograin to provide enhanced transit service within the
City and provide mobility and independence to Senior Citizens,youth and
others who prefer to niove about the City without an automobile
38. Americans with Disabilities Act Compliance Sidewalk Repair and
Rehabilitation
Ongoing citywide program to repair and/or replace pedestrian ramps in
compliance with the Federal Government's Americans with Disabilities
Act
I
I
i
iv
CITY OF KENT
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
YEAR: 2007
PROJECT 41: Clark Springs Watershed Pavement Rehabilitation
Kent Kanglev Road at the Clark Springs Watershed
DESCRIPTION: Dig out and repair areas of the roadbed that have failed. Overlay the full-
width roadway with two inches of asphalt concrete and crack stabilizing
fabric to rehabilitate this arterial.
PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering.................. $60,000
Right of Way Acquisition..........................$0
Construction ............ ........ .............$300,000
TOTAL...........................................$360,000
FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent
PROJECT
JUSTIFICATION: Our Pavement Management Analysts rates this road as a critical
candidate for overlay. The City is increasingly responding to
unscheduled requests to repair potholes. High average daily truck traffic
carrying unusually heavy loads is accelerating the distressed conditions
of the travel lanes, elevating the risk of damage to vehicles from
developing potholes.
41P-Arterial Improvement Piogt am[State],CM,AQ-Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FAST-Freight ]
Action Strategy foi Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corndoi,FMS1B-Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Boat d[State],FTA-
Federal Transit Administration[Federal],FIGS-Hazard Elimination[Federal],I7J-Intelligent Transportation Systems
[Federal],LID-Local Improvement District,PWTF-Public Woiks Trust Fund Loan[State],STP-Surface Transportation
Program[Federal],TIA-Transportation Improvement Account,T18-Transportation Improvement Board[State],TPP—
Transportatron Partnership Program[State]
I
CITY OF KENT
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
YEAR: 2007
PROJECT#2: South 277t" Street Corridor Extension
Widen 1161h Avenue Southeast front Kent Kangley Road(SR 516) to
Southeast 256"' Street
jj DESCRIPTION: Widen 116"' Avenue Southeast to provide a five lane roadway, including
four general-purpose travel lanes, a two-way left turn lane and a bicycle
facility. Also included in this project will be the widening of the
intersection of Kent Kangley Road and 116"' Avenue Southeast to add an
additional left turn lane to provide dual left turn lanes westbound on Kent
Kangley Road to sorthbound 116"' Avenue Southeast and a right turn
acceleration lane eastbound ou Kent Kangley Road from northbound 116"'
Avenue Southeast. The project will include the construction of concrete
curbs, gutters and sidewalks; bicycle lanes; street fighting; stone drainage;
utilities and appurtenances.
PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering.................$400,000
Right of Way Acquisition............$1,100,000
Construction ................................$4,200,000
TOTAL........................................$5,700,000
FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent, LID, TIB
PROJECT
JUSTIFICATION: The stretch of 116'" Avenue between the Kent Kangley Road and SE
256"' Street is a substandard roadway that acts as a bottleneck for those
wishing to access the South 2771" Street corridor from the north and those
wishing to access South 256"' Street from the south. SE 256"' Street, at
the north end of the project, is a major east-west corridor that connects
1 the SR 515/SR516 intersection and SR 18 with 116"' Avenue.
Traffic volumes are continuing to increase and this stretch of the roadway
cannot accommodate the existing or anticipated future traffic volumes.
hn addition, this stretch of 116"' Avenue is lacking curb, gutter and
sidewalk.
AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State],CAIAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FAST—Freight 2
Action Strategy foi Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Condor,FMSIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA—
Fedeial Tiansit Administration[Federal],HES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Tiansportation Systems
[Fedeial],LID—Local Improvement District,PlVTF—Public Woiks Trust Fund Loan[State],STP—Surface Tiansportation
Progiam[Federal],TIA—Tiansportation Improvement Account, TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State], TPP—
Transportation Partnership Progiam[State]
CITY OF KENT
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
YEAR: 2007
PROJECT 93: Kent Station Mitigation Projects
6fiden Willis Street at 4`h Averlve and Central Avenue at Wdhs Street
DESCRIPTION: Provide an additional left-turn pocket on eastbound Willis Street to northbound
Avenue. Provide a right-turn pocket southbound on Central Avenue to westbou
Willis Street
PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering...................$53,000
Right of Way Acquisition... ........... .$44,000
Construction ......... . .................$423,000
TOTAL...........................................S520,000
FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent, Development Mitigation Funds, WSDOT Overlay Funds
PROJECT
JUSTIFICATION: These projects are traffic mitigation requirements for additional trips generated
by the Kent Station development. The City of Kent will be implementing th
projects required by the developer.
AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State],CMAO—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FAST—Freight 3
Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridoi,FilISLY—Freight Mobility Strategic investment Board [State],FT,d—
Federal Tiansit Ad nuustrauon[Federall,HES—Hazard Elimination [Fedeial],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems
[Federal],LID—Local Impiovement District,PWTF—Public Woiks Trust Fund Loan[State],STP—Surface Transportation
Program[Federal], TIA—Transportation Impiovement Account,TIB— transportation Impiovement Board[State], TPP—
Tiansportation Partnership Program[State]
CITY OF KENT
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
1 YEAR: 2007 - 2009
jPROJECT #A Transportation Master Plan
DESCRIPTION: This project consists of a major update of the Transportation Master Plan
including near-teen and long range planning of the City's transportation
system needs. Project costs will include consultant contracts from
transportation planning, concurrency management, public involvement,
travel demand and traffic operations modeling and analysis of potential
financing strategies to construct, operate and maintain the City's
transportation network. The project may include staff resources, hardware
and software to analyze and manage the transportation network and
develop implementing legislation and regulations related to the
transportation system.
i PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering.................$850,000
Right of Way Acquisition..................... ....$0
Construction ..............................................$0
TOTAL...........................................$850,000
FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent
PROJECT
JUSTIFICATION: The City's Transportation Master Plan is more than 20 years old and
needs to be brought into compliance with current Growth Management
I policies and practices as defined in PSRC's Destination 2030, the
region's Metropolitan Transportation Plan The City must be in
compliance with all State, County and Regional policies in order to be
eligible to apply for competitive transportation grants_ Likewise, the City
would like to investigate methods of measuring Concurrency that would
incorporate all modes of travel, better reflect the ways our community is
changing, engage the community in the discussion of their future
transportation investments, and investigate various ways of funding our
future transportation needs.
AIP-Arterial improvement Program[State],CAIAQ-Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FAST-Freight 4
Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FMSIB-Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA-
Federal Transit Administration[Federal],HES-Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS-Intelligent Transportation Systems
[Federal],LID-Local improvement District,PIPTF-Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State],STP-Surface Transportation
Program[Federal], TIA-Transportation Improement Account, TIB-Transportation Improvement Board[State], TPP—
Tiansportation Partnership Program[State]
CITY OF KENT
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
YEAR: 2007
PROJECT#5: South 228th Street/Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad Grade
Separation
Grade Separation crossing at Burlington Northern/Santa Fe Railroad
DESCRIPTION: Construct grade separation of the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad
mainline tracks at South 228th Street. The project will include the
construction of a road overpass or underpass; full-width paving; concrete
curbs, gutter, and sidewalks; street lighting, utilities and appurtenances.
PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering..............$1,250,000
Right of Way Acquisition.. . ..... $1,000,000
Construction ..............................$17,750,000
TOTAL......................................$20,0009000
FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent, TIB, FAST, FMSIB, Burlington Northern Santa Fe
Railroad
PROJECT
JUSTIFICATION: The project will lead to a seamless connection between major freight
handlers and their primary destinations. This project will support fi-eight
moving through Kent to the Ports of Seattle and Tacoma, SeaTac Airport
and the freeway system. Grade separating the arterial will increase both
rail and roadway capacity, decrease congestion, enhance safety, and
improve freight mobility in the corridor and throughout the region. This
project will provide regional connections between thousands of '
businesses, employers and 40 million square feet of warehouse/industrial
space. The level of freight and passenger rail traffic on the BNSF
Railroad mainline is rising as a consequence of increased traffic in the
Puget Sound area, and new Sound Transit and Amtrak service.
AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State],04AQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal];FAST—Freight 5
Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridoi,Fr14S18—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],PTA—
Fedeial Transit Administration[Federal],TIES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems
[Federal], LID—Local Improvement District,Pff TF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State],STP—Surface Transportation
Program[Fedeial] TIA—Transportdnon Improvement Account, TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State], TPP—
Transportation Paitneiship Program[State]
CITY OF KENT
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
YEAR: 2008
PROJECT #6: East Valley Highway(84"' Avenue South) Improvements.
SR 167 to South 212'4 Street
DESCRIPTION: Widen the roadway to provide 3 general purpose lanes in each direction
between South 2121" Street and South 220' Street. Construct new curb,
gutters and sidewalks on both sides of the roadway where they don't
currently exist. Remove and rehabilitate the existing roadway pavement
to add service life to the roadway. Overlay the entire roadway area with
asphalt concrete pavement. Project includes upgrading existing traffic
signal systems as well as storm drainage improvements.
PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering.................$217,000
Right of Way Acquisition...............$706,000
Construction ................................$2,410,000
TOTAL........................................$3,333,000
FUNDING SOURCE(S): STP, City of Kent, TIB, LID
PROJECT
JUSTIFICATION: This portion of East Valley Highway cannot acconunodate current and
proposed traffic volumes that utilize this stretch to access State Route l67
and South 212th Street. In addition, the existing pavement along this
section of 84ih Avenue South is showing signs of structural distress as
demonstrated by "alligatonng", longitudinal cracking, and cracking of the
curbs and gutters.
j
AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[state],CHAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal];FAST—Freight 6
Action Strategy foi Evei ett-Seattle-Tacoma Coi ridor,FHSW—Freight Mobility Strategic investment Board[State],FTA—
Federal Tiansit Admiiusuation[Fedeial],ILES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS—intelligent Transportation Systems
[Federal],LiD—Local linpiovement District,PWTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State],.STP—Surface Transportation
Ptogiant[Federal], TIA—Transportation Improvement Account, TIB—Transportation linpiovement Board[State],TPP—
Transportation Partneiship Piogram[State]
CITY OF KENT
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
YEAR: 2008
PROJECT#7: I-5lSouth 272"d Street Interchange Reconstruction, Phase I
Provide transit and HOV Dived-Access between South 272"d St and I-5
DESCRIPTION: Phase I would reconstruct the east half of the South 272"d Street/I-5 interchange !4�
provide transit and HOV Direct-Access to South 272❑d Street. Sound Transit aui
King County Metro Transit have major park and ride facilities in the area w
over 1,200 parking stalls. Transit and HOV traffic would be able to turn on
South 272"d Street from I-5 without weaving through traffic on I-5 The prole
includes a new northbound I-5 bridge and reconstruction of approximately of
half mile of northbound I-5. The improvements would be constructed to mate
projects on South 272"d Street that would be built between Pacific Highway Sou 1
(SR 99) and Military Road.
PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering.. ..... . ..$3,850,000
Right of Way Acquisition...............$170,000
Construction . . ........................$30,800,000
TOTAL......................................$34,8209000
FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent, City of Federal Way, King County, STP, Sound Trarisi1.
TPP, WSDOT
PROJECT
JUSTIFICATION: The traffic volumes at the interchange have reached the point where
reconstruction is required to reduce congestion The new inteichange
provide needed capacity through the year 2030. The reconstruction will a
allow Sound Transit and King County Metro Transit to operate efficient y
through the Star Lake and Redondo Heights Park and Ride lots
i
.4IP-Arterial huprovernent Program[State],CAIAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FAST—Freight 7
Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FMSI8—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA—
Federal Transit Administration[Federal],KES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Tiansportation Systems
[Federal],LID—Local Impror ement Distract,PWTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan [State],STP—Surface Tiansportation
Progiam[Federal], TTA—Tianspoitation Improvement Account, TIB—Transportation Improvement Boaid[State], TPP—
Transportation Partnership Program[State]
CITY OF KENT
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
iYEAR: 2008
iPROJECT#8: 72nd Avenue South Extension
South 20Vh Street to South 1961h Street
DESCRIPTION: Construct a new four-lane roadway from South 200"' Street to South 196"' Street.
The project will include the crossing of Mill Creek and construction of fiull-width
paving; concrete curbs, gutters, and sidewalks, street lighting, storm drainage;
landscaping, utilities and appurtenances.
PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering.................$195,000
Right of Way Acquisition..........................$0
Construction . . . ..... ... .................$690,000
TOTAL...........................................$885,000
FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent
PROJECT
JUSTIFICATION: Continued development in the northern Kent industrial area, and high levels of
congestion along West Valley Highway between the South 180"' Street and
South 1961h Street corridors, mandate additional north-south arterial capacity.
This project provides some relief for South 180th Street, South 196"' Street, and
South 212th Street intersections along West Valley Highway. It also provides
improved access to the South 196th Street corridor from industrial development
along 72"d Avenue South by constructing the trussing link between South 200"i
Street and South 196"' Street.
I AIP-Arterial Imps ovement Program[State],CMAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FAST—Freight 8
Action Strategy foi Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FMSIB—Fteight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA—
Federal Transit Administ ation[Federal],IIES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems
[Fedeial),LID—Local Inipiovement District,PWTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State],STP—Surface Tianspoitation
Ptogiam[Federal], TIA—Transportation Improvement Account,TIB—Transportation Improvement Boaid[State],TPP—
Tiansportation Partnership Program[State]
CITY OF KENT
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
YEAR: 2008
PROJECT#9: Smart Growth Initiative
DESCRIPTION: Widen Smith Street to provide a left turn lane from eastbound Smith Street ,
onto northbound Lincoln Avenue. The project includes the construction
of a new traffic signal at the intersection of South and Lincoln as well as
the reconstruction of existing curb, gutter and sidewalks along Smith
Street.
Widen Willis Street to provide a left turn lane from eastbound Willis
Street to northbound 2"d Avenue South. This project includes construction
of new curb, gutter and sidewalks along 2"d Avenue between Willis Street
and Saar Street.
PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering.................$225,000
Right of Way Acquisition...............$305,000
Construction ................................$1,250,000
TOTAL........................................$1,780,000
FUNDING SOURCE(S): STP, City of Kent
PROJECT
JUSTIFICATION: These projects will improve traffic flow within the Kent Urban Center
and improve access to Kent Station and the downtown business district
The left turn pocket at Willis and 2"d Streets will improve access to the
City's Central Business District and stimulate economic development by
providing a direct connection between downtown Kent and State Route
516 The left turn pocket and signal at Smith and Lincoln Streets will
facilitate the redevelopment of a portion of King County Metro Transit's
Park and Ride Lot.
A1P-Arterial Improvement Program[State],CMAQ-Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FAST-Freight 9
Action Strategy foi Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FMSIB--Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FT4-
Federal Tiansit Administration[Fedeiall,IIES-Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS-Intelligent Transpoi tation Systems
[Fe leiall, LID-Local Impiovement District,PbiTF-Public works Trust Fund Loan [State],STP-Sui face Transportation
Progiam[Federal], TIA-Transpoiation Impiovement Account, TIB-Transportation Impiovement Board[State], TPP—
Tiansportation Partnership Program[State]
i
CITY OF KENT
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
YEAR: 2008
PROJECT#10: Interurban Trail Crossings Signal Interconnect
West Afeeker Street and West Smith Street
DESCRIPTION: Interconnect the existing traffic signals at the Interurban Trail crossings at
West Meeker Street and West Smith Street to the Union Pacific Railroad
crossings signals at said streets
PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering...................$38,000
Right of Way Acquisition...............$304,000
Construction ........ ..... .. . .............. ..... ....$0
TOTAL...........................................$3427000
FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent,
iPROJECT
JUSTIFICATION: This project is required in order to interconnect the existing street signals
' with the railroad crossing signals. It will eliminate potential conflicts
where traffic could back up across the railroad tracks. Most of the cost of
this project is for the Union Pacific Railroad to upgrade their grade
crossing signal equipment to provide sufficient warning time of an
approaching train.
AIP-Aitenal Improvement Program[State] CVAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FAST—Freight 10
i Action Strategy for Beiett-Seattle-Tacoma Cot ridoi,FAISIB—Freight Mobdrty Stiategic Investment Board[State],FTA—
Federal Tiansit Adnumsnation [Federal],LIES—Hazard Ehmmation[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Tianspotation Svstetns
[Fedeia]],LTD—Local Impiovement Dish ict,PJVTF—Public Works Tiusl Fund Loan[State],STP—Surface Transportation
Program[Federal], TM—Transportation Improvement Account,TIB—Transportation ImpiovementBoaid[State], TPP—
Transportation Paitneiship Program[State)
1
CITY OF KENT
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
YEAR: 2009
PROJECT 911: SE 248th Street Improvements ,
116`h Avenue Southeast to 132"d Avenue Southeast
DESCRIPTION: Construct a new three lane roadway from 1161h Avenue Southeast to 132nd
Avenue Southeast which includes the construction of full width paving;
possible bicycle lanes, concrete curbs, gutters, and sidewalks; street
lighting; stone drainage; landscaping; utilities and appurtenances The
project includes either a modem roundabout at the 1161h Avenue Southeast
intersection or a traditional traffic signal. Improvements to vertical
roadway geometry for sight distance and safety will also be addressed.
PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering ................$800,000
Right of Way Acquisition...............$120,000
Construction .............................. .$4,000,000
TOTAL........................................S4,920,000
FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent, LID, Development Mitigation Funds
PROJECT i
JUSTIFICATION: Additional capacity is required to accommodate existing development in
the East Hill area of the city. This project will provide additional east- ,
west capacity to supplement SE 240t1i Street to the north, and SE 256t11
Street to the south. Whether or not bicycle lanes are added depends upon
the final bicycle route plan adopted in the Transportation Master Plan. In
addition, the southeast corner of SE 248t1' Street and 124th Avenue SE is
the future site of the City of Kent's Public Works maintenance facility.
.4IP-Arterial Improvement Program[State],CM.4Q—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FAST—Freight 1 1
Action Su ategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FMSIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA—
Federal Tiansit Admmisnation[Federal],HES—tlatard Elinmation[Federal], (TS—Intelligent Transportation Systems
[Federal],LID—Local Improvement District, PFLTF—Public works Tiust Fund Loan[State],STP—Sur face Transportation
Piogiam[Federal], TI4—Transportation improvement Account, TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State], TPP—
Transportation Partnership Program[State]
I
CITY OF KENT
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
1 YEAR: 2010
j PROJECT #12: 80'h Avenue South Widening
South 196"' Street to South 1881h Street
DESCRIPTION: Widen 801h Avenue South from South 196t1' Street to South 188`, Street to five
lanes. This will include four general-purpose lanes and a two-way left turn lane.
The project will also include the construction of full width paving; concrete curbs,
gutters, and sidewalks; street lighting; storm drainage; utilities and appurtenances
PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering.................$170,000
Right of Way Acquisition...............$350,000
Constriction . .................................$630,000
1 TOTAL........................................$1,150,000
1 FUNDING SOURCF(S): City of Kent, LID
1 PROJECT
JUSTIFICATION: The opening of the 196`h Street corridor on the south end of the project and
1 Renton's completion of Oaksdale Avenue South results in 80`h Avenue South
being a significant north-south corridor serving the industrial area As a result,
the increased traffic volumes along this section of 80`I' Avenue South could reach
the point where a consistent five lane roadway section is required to provide safe
left turn access into the adjoining properties. Further, concrete curbs and gutters
are required to provide control of roadway drainage and to prevent impacts to
adjacent property owners. Sidewalks and street lighting will provide safe access
for pedestrians.
i
AIP-Artei ial Ii provenient Program[State], CAfAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FAST—Freight 12
Action Strategy foi Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FAISIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA—
Federal Tiansit Administration[Federal],HES—Hazaid Fhmmation [Federal],ITS—InteIIigentTianspoitation Systems
[Federal],LID—Local Improvement District,PWTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State],S7P—Sun face Transportation
Program[Federal], TIA—Transportation hnprovement Account, TIB—Tiansportaton Improvement Boaid[State],TPP—
Ti anspoi tat ion Pai tnen ship Progn am[State]
1
i
CITY OF KENT
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM t
YEAR: 2010
PROJECT #13: Military Road South at Reith Road.
Intersection Iinprovenlent
DESCRIPTION: Widen all approaches of Military Road South at Reith Road Intersection to
provide exclusive left turn lanes for each approach, and exclusive right
turn lanes for northbound and southbound traffic on Military Road South
and westbound traffic on Reith Road. Replace the existing traffic signal
The project will include the construction of full width paving, paved
shoulders, street lighting, stone drainage, utilities and appurtenances
PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering.................$140,000
Right of Way Acquisition...............$160,000
Construction ................................$1,400,000
TOTAL........................................$1,700,000
FUNDING SOURCE(S): TIB, City of Kent, Developer Mitigation Funds
PROJECT '
JUSTIFICATION: The level of development on the Kent West Hill coupled with the growth
in the Puget Sound area and the regularly occurring congestion along
both Pacific Highway South and Interstate 5 results in sigruficant
congestion at this intersection in the morning and evening peak hours
AIP-Arterial hnprorement Program[State],CMAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal].F,4ST—Freight 13
Action Strategy for E%ciett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridoi,FMSIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA—
Federal Tiansn Adnunisnation[Fedeial],HFS—Hazard Elimination [Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems
[Federal],LID—Local Improvement Disti ict,Pu'TF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State],STP—Surface Transportation
Progiam[Federal],TM—Transportation Impiovement Account,TIB—Tiansportation improvement Board[State], TPP—
Transportation Partnership Program[State]
1
CITY OF KENT
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
YEAR: 2010
PROJECT #14: South 228t6 Street/Union Pacific Railroad Grade Separation
Grade Separation crossing at Union Pacific Railroad
DESCRIPTION: Construct grade separation of the Union Pacific Railroad mainline tracks at South
228"i Street The project will include the construction of an overpass or an
underpass road; full-width paving; concrete curbs, gutters and sidewalks; street
lighting; utilities and appurtenances.
PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering..............$1,500,000
Right of Way Acquisition............$1,000,000
Construction ..............................$19,500,000
TOTAL......................................$22,000,000
FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent, TIB, FAST, FMSIB, Union Pacific Railroad
PROJECT
JUSTIFICATION: The project will lead to a seamless connection between major freight handlers
and their primary destinations. This project will support freight moving through
Kent to the Ports of Seattle and Tacoma, SeaTac Airport and the freeway system.
Grade separating this arterial will increase both rail and roadway capacity,
1 decrease congestion, enhance safety, improve freight mobility in this corridor
and throughout the region. This project will provide regional connections for
thousands of businesses, employers, and the 40 million square feet of
warehouse/industrial space in the valley.
AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State],CMAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FAST—Freight 14
Action Snategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridoi,FAfSI6—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA—
Fedei al I iansit Administration[Federal],KES—Hazard Elunmat on[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems
[Federal],LID—Local Impiovement District,PWTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State],STP—Surface Tian sportation
Program [Federal], TIA—Tiansportat ion Improvement Account, TIB—Transportation Impiovement Board[State], TPP—
Tiansportation Partneiship Program[State]
CITY OF KENT
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
YEAR: 2010
PROJECT#15: Southeast 256t1i Street Widening, Phase II
SR 516(Kent KangleF Road) to 116`I' Avenue SE
DESCRIPTION: Constrict a new three lane roadway from SR 516 (Kent Langley Road) to
116tb Avenue SE including bike lanes on both sides of the roadway. The
project will include construction of full-width paving; concrete curbs,
gutters, and sidewalks; street lighting; storm drainage; landscaping;
utilities, and appurtenances.
PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering.................$315,000
Right of Way Acquisition...............$435,000
Construction ........ .......................$3,100,000
TOTAL........................................$3,850,000
FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent, Local Improvement District, TIB
PROJECT
JUSTIFICATION: SE 256th Street is a two-lane roadway with no curbs, gutters or sidewalks
and a limited street light system_ During peak hours, the roadway catinot
accommodate the traffic volumes due to the large number of vehicles
blocking the roadway while waiting to turn left into driveways. The '
widening of SE 256"' Street also alleviates traffic on SR 516 (Kent
Kangley Road) as the two roads essentially run parallel to each other.
The project will increase the capacity of this roadway by adding a new
center two-way left turn lane. This project will connect the SR
515/SR516 intersection with the improvements already existing on SE
256t1' Street east of 116"' Avenue SE.
AIP- Aiteiial Improvement Program[State],Ct,9Q-Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FAST-Freight 15
Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,F,IISLY-Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA-
Federal Transit Administration[Fedeiall,LIES-Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS-Intelligent Transportation Systems
[Federal],LID-Local Impiovement District,PIVTF-Public Woiks Trust Fund Loan[State],STP-Sui face Tiansportation
Piogram[Federal],TIA-Transportation Improvement Account, T[B-Transportation Impiovement Board[State],TPP—
Tiansportanon Partnership Program[State]
i
CITY OF KENT
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
YEAR: 2010
PROJECT #16: Central Avenue Soutb Pavement Rehabilitation
Green Raver Bridge to Fast Wallas Street (SR 516)
DESCRIPTION: Remove and rehabilitate the existing roadway pavement to add service life to the
roadway, between the Green River Bridge and East Willis Street (SR 516), This
project will include the removal and replacement of failing pavement sections and
a full-width asphalt concrete overlay of the entire roadway. Also included in this
project is the selective replacement of curbs, gutters and sidewalks as well as
minor storm drainage improvements.
IPROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering.. ..............$120,000
Right of Way Acquisition..........................$0
jConstruction .......................... .....$1,380,000
TOTAL........................................$1,500,000
FUNDING SOURCE(S): STP, City of Kent
PROJECT
JUSTIFICATION: The existing paving along this section of Central Avenue South is exhibiting
signs of distress, as demonstrated by "alligatoring", longitudinal cracking, and
cracking of the curbs and gutters. The service life of this roadway has been
reached, necessitating reconstruction of the pavement to extend the service life of
the roadway, and prevent further pavement degradation. The sidewalk system is
' sub-standard in many locations and in need of replacement.
AIP-Artei tal Improvement Program[State],C MAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FAST—Freight 16
Action Strategy lot Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Comdoi,FMStB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],PTA—
Federal Transit Administration[Federal],IIES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],tTS—Intelligent Transportation Systems
[Federal],LID—Local Improvement District,PWTF—Public Works Ti ust Fund Loan[State],STP—Surface Tiansponation
Piogi am[Federal], TIA—Transpoi tation Improvement Account, T16—Transportation Improvement Board [State], TPP—
Tianspoilation Partneiship Program[State]
CITY OF KENT
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
YEAR: 2010
PROJECT #17: South 228t" Street Corridor—Phase III, South 224"' Street Extension j
84`L'Avenue South to 1041It Avenue Southeast(Berson Road) (SR 515)
DESCRIPTION: Constrict a new five-lane road from 84"' Avenue South to 104th Aveng-
Southeast (Benson Road) (SR 515), including a new bridge over SR 167, and
modify the traffic signals at the Intersection of South 224"' Street and 84"' AvenI South The project will include the construction of full-width paving, cuncr
curbs, gutters and sidewalks; street lighting; storm drainage; landscaping; uttlits
and appurtenances.
PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering........... ..$1,725,000
Right of Way Acquisition.. ........$5,525,000
Construction ....... ......................$21,500,000
TOTAL......................................$28,750,000
FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent, LID
PROJECT
JUSTIFICATION: The existing roadway system cannot accommodate the current and forecast c.
west traffic congestion between Kent's East Hill and the Green River Val
l,
floor. In order to meet transportation concurrency requirements of the Growth
Management Act, additional east-west vehicle capacity is required. Intersecti
along South 208"'/212th Street and James/SE 240"' Streets are also at or o 1
capacity. It is not feasible to widen the James/SE 240th Street and So l
208"'/212th Street `corridors' to accommodate forecast traffic volumes with
additional east-west capacity because of existing development and topograp c
constraints.
ALP-Aiteiial Improvement Progiam[State], CA4AQ-Con gestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],F4ST-Freight i7
Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,)-AISIB-Freight Mobility Stiategic Investment Board[State],FTA-
Federal Tiansit Administration[Federal],LEES-Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS-Intelligent Transportation Systems
[Fedeial],LID-Local Impiovement Disnict,PlVTF-Public Works Trust Fetid Loan[State],STP-Surface Transportation
Progiam[Federal], TIA-Transportation Improvement Account,TIB-Transportation Improvement Braid[State], TPP—
Tianspoitation Partnership Program[State]
CITY OF KENT
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
YEAR: 2011
PROJECT #18: Willis Street (SR 516)/Union Pacific Railroad Grade Separation
Grade Separation Crossing at Union Pacific Radroad(UPRR)
DESCRIPTION: Construct grade separation of the Union Pacific Railroad's mainline tracks
at Willis Street (SR 516). The project will include the construction of a
railroad bridge, a four-lane roadway under-crossing, full width paving;
concrete curbs, gutters, and sidewalks, sheet lighting; utilities and
1 appurtenances.
I PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering. ... ........$4,600,000
Right of Way Acquisition ........................$0
Construction ..... ........................$18,400,000
TOTAL......................................$23,000,000
FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent, FAST, FMSIB, Port of Seattle, Port of Tacoma, TIB,
Union Pacific Railroad
PROJECT
JUSTIFICATION: This project supports east-west freight and commuter mobility in the
Green River Valley. More than 26,000 vehicles per day travel on Willis
Street, including over 800 freight-bearing bucks. The level of freight
traffic on the UP Railroad mamlme is also increasing to approximately 20
trains a day. Grade separations provide the solution to the costly problem
of congestion. The railroad crossing will no longer impede freight and
other traffic flow Reductions in traffic congestion on adjoining streets
and reduced environmental Impacts caused by traffic congestion are also
expected. This project will enhance Kent as an economic generator and
provide regional connections for thousands of businesses, employers, and
commuters.
AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State], CAIAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FAST—Freight 18
Action Strategy for Eveiett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FAfSIB—Freight MobiItry Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA—
Federal Transit Unimistaton[Federal],HES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems
[Federal],LID—Local Improvement District,PWTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State],STP—Surface Transportation
Program[Federal], TIA—Transportation improvement Account, TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State], TPP
Transportation Partnership Program[State]
CITY OF KENT
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
YEAR: 2011
PROJECT #19: Willis Street(SR 516)/Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad Grade
Separation
Grade Separation Crossings at Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad
DESCRIPTION: Construct grade separation at the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad
mainline tracks at Wills Street (SR 516). The project will include the
construction of a railroad bridge; four-lane vehicle under-crossing, full
width paving; concrete curbs, gutters, and sidewalks, street lighting;
utilities and appurtenances.
PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering..............$3,500,000
Right of Way Acquisition............$3,500,000
Construction .......................... ...$12,700,000
TOTAL......................................$19,700,000
FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent, Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad, FAST,
FMSIB, Port of Seattle, Port of Tacoma, TIB
PROJECT
JUSTIFICATION: This project supports east/west freight and commuter mobility in the
Green River Valley. More than 26,000 vehicles per day travel on Willis
Street, including over 800 freight-bearing trucks. The level of freight and
passenger rail traffic on the BNSF Railroad mainline is also increasing to
approximately 45 trains a day. Grade separation provides more efficient
movements of goods and provides a solution to the costly problem of
congestion The railroad crossing will no longer impede freight and other
traffic flow. Reductions in traffic congestion on adjoining streets and
reduced environmental impacts caused by traffic congestion is expected.
This project will enhance Kent as an economic generator and provide
regional connections for thousands of businesses, employers, and
commuters.
AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State],CMAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FAST—Freight 19
Action Strategy for Evetett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FMSIB—Freight Mobility Stiategte Investment Board[State],FTA—
Federal Tiansit Administration[Federal],fIES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS—intelligent Transportation Systems
[Federal],LiD—Local improvement District,P4VTF—Public Worms Trust Fund Loan [State],STP—Surface Tiansportation
Program[Federa]], TIA—Transportation Improvement Account,TIB—Ttansportatton improvement Board[State], TPP—
Tiansportation Partnership Program[State]
■ CITY OF KENT
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
YEAR: 2011
PROJECT #20: Military Road Widening
South 272ad Street to South 240'h Street
DESCRIPTION: Widen Military Road South from South 272nd Street to South 24e Street
adding left tum pockets at key intersections. (Note- Reith Road and
South 272°d Street intersections are separate projects and not included in
this project.)
r�
PROJECT COST: Preliminary Enguneenng.................$230,000
Right of Way Acquisition..........................$0
Construction ...............................$2,070,000
TOTAL........................................$2,300,000
FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent
PROJECT
JUSTIFICATION: The level of development along this section of Military Road South has
jreached the point where separated turn pockets are required to provide
■ safe turning movements at key intersections and reduce the congestion by
separating the turning movements from the through traffic.
ATP-Artei laI Improvement Program[State],CMAQ-Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FAST-Freight 20
Action Strategy foi Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FMSIB-Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA-
Federal Transit Adminisnauon[Federal],11FS-Hazard Elimination[Fedetai],ITS-Intelligent Transportation Systems
[Federal],LID-Local Iniprovenient District, Pff,'TF-Public Works Tiust Fund Loan[State],STP-Surface Tiansportation
Pigram[Federal], 7IA -Tiansportation Improvement Account, TIB-Transportation lmpiovement Board[State], TPP—
Tianspoitation Paitnership Program[State]
CITY OF KENT
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
YEAR: 2011
PROJECT 421: South 212"' Street/Union Pacific Railroad Grade Separation
Glade Separation Crossing at Union Paczfrc Rath-oad
DESCRIPTION: Construct grade separation of the Union Pacific Railroad's mainline tracks
at South 212t1' Street. The project will include the construction of a
railroad bridge; a six-lane roadway under-crossing; full-width paving;
concrete curbs, gutters, and sidewalks; sheet lighting, utilities and
appurtenances.
j
PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering............ .$4,600,000
Right of Way Acquisition............$1,200,000
Construction ..............................$23,000,000
TOTAL......................................$28,800,000
FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent, FAST, TIB,Union Pacific Railroad
PROJECT
JUSTIFICATION: This project supports east-west freight and commuter mobility in the
Green River Valley Approximately 29,000 vehicles per day travel on
South 212t1' Street, including nearly 3,500 freight bearing tricks. The
level of freight traffic on the UP Railroad mainline is also increasing to
approximately 20 trains a day. Grade separations provide the solution to
the costly problem of congestion. The railroad crossing wilt no longer
mipede freight and other traffic flow. Reductions in traffic congestion on
adjoining streets and reduced environmental impacts caused by traffic
congestion is also expected. This project will enhance Kent as an
economic generator and provide regional connections for thousands of
businesses, employers, and conunuters.
AIP-Arterial improvement Program[State].CMAO-Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FAST-Freight 21
Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Con idol,FMSIB-Freight Mohdity Strategic investment Board[State],I-TA-
Federal Transit Administration[Federal],LIES-Hazard Ehmuiati on[Federal],ITN-1ntclhgentTranspoitahon Systems
[Fedei al],LID-Local Impi ovement District,PJVTF-Public Avoiks Tiust Fund Loan [State],STP-Surface Ti ansportation
Piogiam [Federal], TIA-Transportation impiovement Account,TIB-Transportation improvement Board[State], TPP—
Tiansportanon Partneiship Program[State]
CITY OF KENT
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
YEAR: 2011
1 PROJECT #22: South 212t" Street/Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad Grade
Separation
Grade Separation Crossings at Burlington Norther Santa Fe Railroad
DESCRIPTION: Construct grade separation at the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad
mainline tracks at South 212"' Street. The project will include the
construction of a railroad bridge; six-lane vehicle under crossing; full
width paving; concrete curbs, gutters, and sidewalks; street liglntmg,
utilities and appurtenances.
PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering..............$4,600,000
Right of Way Acquisition............$1,200,000
jConstruction ..............................$23,000,000
TOTAL......................................$28,800,000
FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent, FAST, TIB, Burlington Nor-them Santa Fe Railroad
PROJECT
JUSTIFICATION: This project supports east-west freight and commuter mobility in the
Green River Valley. Approximately 29,000 vehicles per day travel on
South 212"' Street, including nearly 3,500 fretght-beanng trucks. The
level of freight and passenger rail traffic on the BNSF Railroad mainline
is also increasing to approximately 45 trains a day. Grade separation
provides more efficient movement of goods and provides a solution to the
costly problem of congestion. The railroad crossing will no longer
impede freight and other traffic flow. Reductions in traffic congestion on
adjoining streets and reduced environmental impacts caused by traffic
i congestion is expected. This project will enhance Kent as an economic
generator and provide regional connections for thousands of businesses,
employers and commuters.
AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State],C14AQ-Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FAST-Freight 22
Action Suategyfoi Everett-Seattle-TacomaCou idol,FUSIB-Fr eight Mobility Strategic lnvestmentBoard(State],FTA-
Fedei al Transit Admimstiation [Fedeiall,HES-Ha7aid Elimination [Federal],ITS- Intelligent Transportation Systems
[Federal],LID-Local Improvement Distract,PWTF-Pub]ic Woiks Trust Fund Loan[Stale],STP-Surface'Iiansportation
Program[Federal], TIA -Transportation lmprovement Account, TIB-Transportation Improvement Board[State], TPP—
Tianspotation Partneiship Piogram[State]
CITY OF KENT
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
YEAR: 2011
PROJECT #23: West Meeker Street Widening—Phase I
64'I'Avenue South to the Green River Bridge
DESCRIPTION: Widen West Meeker Street to provide a five lane roadway, including four
general purpose travel lanes, a center left tuna lane, bicycle lanes, a
pedestrian signal at the Riverbend Golf Course, and modifications to the
existing traffic signal system at the intersection of West Meeker Street and
Russell Road. The project will include the construction of full-width
paving; concrete curbs, gutters and sidewalks; landscaping; street lighting,
storm drainage, utilities and appurtenances
i
PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering.................$920,000
Right of Way Acquisition............$1,040,000
Construction ...............................$3,220,000
TOTAL........................................$5J 80,000
FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent
PROJECT
JUSTIFICATION: The level of development along this section of Meeker Street has reached
the point whereby a consistent five lane roadway segment Is required to
accommodate through traffic. Existing traffic volumes west of the
intersection of 64"' Avenue South Indicate the need for a five lane section
to accommodate additional development. Sidewalk and bicycle
improvements will provide additional Incentive to encourage a safe and
attractive walking and biking environment, promote alternative modes of
travel, and facilitate access to scenic and recreational facilities.
,41P-Arterial Improvement Program[State];CMAQ-Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal]:FAST-Freight 23
Acuon Shategy Poi Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Coi ndoi,FMSIR-Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FT-1-
Fedeial Transit Adnunisnation[Federal], HES-Hazaid Elimination[Fedeiall,ITS-IntelIigentTransportation Systems
[Fedei al I,LID-Local Improvement Disn ict,Pff'TF-Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State],STP-Surface Transportation
Piogiani[Federal], TGI-Transpoitation Impiovement Account,77B-Transportation Improvement Board[State], TPP—
Tiansportation Partnership Program[State]
i
i
CITY OF KENT
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
YEAR: 2011
PROJECT#24: West Meeker Street Widening—Phase II
SR 516 to the east side of the Green River, including a new bridge
DESCRIPTION: Widen West Meeker Street between SR 516 and the Green River to
provide a five lane roadway, including four general purpose travel lanes, a
center left turn lane, and bicycle lanes. Construct a second two lane
bridge for westbound traffic with a bike lane and sidewalk over the Green
River parallel to the existing structure and convert the existing bridge to
one-way eastbound with an eastbound bike lane. The project will include
construction of full width paving, concrete curbs, gutters and sidewalks,
street lighting; stone drainage, utilities and appurtenances.
t
PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering.................$920,000
Right of Way Acquisition............ . . . . . .$0
Construction .. .. . . ............. .......$4,000,000
jTOTAL........................................$4,920,000
FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent
PROJECT
JUSTIFICATION: The level of development along this section of Meeker Street has reached
the point whereby a consistent five lane roadway is required to
accommodate through traffic. Existing traffic volumes indicate the need
for five lanes to accommodate additional development. Sidewalk and
i bicycle improvements will provide additional incentive to encourage a
safe and attractive walking and bicycling environment, promote
alternative modes of travel, and facilitate access to scenic and recreational
1 facilities
AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State],CAIAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal];FAST—Freight 24
Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FARM—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA—
Federal Transit Adnunistration[Federal],TIES—hazard EIunmation[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems
[Federal],LID—Local Improvement District,Pif'TF—Public works Trust Fund Loan[State].STP—Surface Transportation
Program[Federal], TIA—Tr ail spoitaoon Improvement Account, TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State], TPP—
Transportation Partnership Program[State]
CITY OF KENT
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
YEAR: 2011
PROJECT #25: 108t1i Avenue SE Extension
SE Kent Kangley Road(SR 516) to SE 256 ' Sheet
DESCRIPTION: Construct a new three lane roadway from SE Kent Kangley Road (SR
516) to SE 2561h Street including rebuilding the traffic signals at the
intersection of SE Kent Kangley Road and 108"' Avenue SE and installing
a new traffic signal at the intersection of SE 256"' Street and 109"' Avenue
SE. The project includes right turn lanes northbound at 256"' Street and
Southbound at Kent Kangley Road. The project will also include
construction of full width paving; concrete curbs, gutters and sidewalks;
street lighting; storm drainage; landscaping, utilities and appurtenances.
As part of this project, the eastbound left-turn lane from Kent Kangley
Road to 256th Street will be eliminated.
PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering.................$120,000
Right of Way Acquisition.............. $860,000
Construction ...............................$1,040,000
TOTAL........................................$2,020,000
FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent
PROJECT
JUSTIFICATION: This project will relieve congestion at the Y intersection of 104"' Avenue
SE (Benson Highway) (SR 515)/Kent Kangley Road (SR 516)/SE 256"'
Street by improving the traffic flow along SR 516 It will eliminate the
left turn pocket from SR 516 to SE 2561h Street and redirect that traffic
along SR 516 to 108th Avenue SE. There will be a new left turn pocket
constructed for motorists wishing to travel north on 108"' Avenue SE to
SE 2560' Street. By moving these left turning movements further to the
east, away from the congested Y intersection, all directions of traffic will
be able to flow more efficiently This extension will also provide another
way for East Hill residents to have direct access to the business-by-pass
route and better access to the commercial area south of the Kent Kangley
Road/104th Avenue SE intersection.
AIP-Arterial Improvement Piogram[State],CAflQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FAST—Freight 25
Action Strategy for Evei ett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FAlSIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Boat [State],FT,4—
Federal Transit Administration[Federal],HPS--Hazard Elimination[Federal],fTS—Intelligent Ttansportahon Systems
[Federal],LID—Local Improvement District,PWTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan [State],STP—Surface Transportation
Program[Federal], TM—TianSportation Improvement Account,TIR—Transportat ion Improvement Board[State],TPP—
Tiansportation Partnership Program[State]
1
1
CITY OF KENT
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
YEAR: 2012
iPROJECT#26: South 272"d Street Widening, Phase II
Pacific Highway South to Military Road South
DESCRIPTION: Add two HOV lanes and left-turn lanes at intersections from Pacific Highwav
South (SR 99) to Military Road South Construction will include full width
paving; concrete curb, gutter, and sidewalks; street lighting; storm drainage.
utilities; traffic signals; and appurtenances. The project also includes widening
the roadway under the I-5 bridges
PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering..............$1,290,000
Right of Way Acquisition............$1,260,000
Construction ..............................$10,100,000
TOTAL......................................$1296509000
FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent, TIB, Washington State Transportation Partnership Account,
Federal, Sound Transit
PROJECT
JUSTIFICATION: Traffic volumes between Pacific Highway South and Military Road South have
reached the point where improvements supporting HOV-added capacity are
' required to reduce congestion at the intersections and reduce backups
approaching I-5. The HOV lanes will provide access to the Star Lake Park and
Ride lot and the Redondo Heights Park and Ride lot. Adding HOV lanes and
HOV access to I-5 supports various county and City of Federal Way
transportation and transit improvement projects.
AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State],CAIAQ-Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FAST-Freight 26
Action Strategy for Evei ett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FMSIB-Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA-
Fedeial Tiansit Administration [Fedeial],IIES-Flazaid Elimination(Federal],ITS-intelligent Transportation Systems
[Federall,LID -Local Improvement District,PIVTF-Public Woiks Trust Fund Loan[Statel,STP-Surface Transportation
Program[Fedeiall, TCA-Transportation hnprovement Account, TIB-Transportation Inipiovement Board[State], TPP—
Transportation Partnership Program[State]
CITY OF KENT
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
YEAR: 2012
PROJECT #27: SR 184/West Valley Highway/Washington Avenue Widening
Meeker Street north to approxrmately the 218" block-
DESCRIPTION: Widen the existing five lane road to seven lanes to include three lanes in
each direction and a center him lane and install a traffic signal at the
intersection of West Valley Highway and South 238t1' Street The project
will Include the construction of full-width paying; concrete curbs, gutters
and sidewalks; street lighting; stone drainage; landscaping; utilities and
appurtenances.
PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering.................$860,000
Right of Way Acquisition............$4,700,000
Construction ................................$9,100,000
TOTAL......................................$14,660,000
FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent, STP, TIB, WSDOT
PROJECT
JUSTIFICATION: SR 181/West Valley Highway/Washington Avenue is a major north-
south route through the City and an important truck route for freight
moving between the manufacturing, industrial and warehousing center of
the Green River Valley and the regional freight corridors. This route is
seven lanes wide both north and south of the project segment With
increasing traffic volumes from the expected growth in both the freight
and commute segments, the widening is needed to reduce congestion at
intersections and reduce backups approaching SR 167 and South 212t1'
Stl eet.
AIP-Artei ial Impi ovement Program[State],C'AMQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quahtv[Federa]],FAST—Freight 27
Action Strategy for Everett-Scathe-Tacoma Comdor,FAIS18—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Boaid [State],FTA—
Fedeial Transit Adminisnation[Fedeial], KES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems
[Fed eial],LID—Local It piovement Dishict,PIVTF—Public woiks Trust Fund Loan[State],STP—Suiface Transportation
Program[Federal], TI4—Transportation Impiovement Account, TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State], TPP—
Transportation Partnership Program[State]
CITY OF KENT
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
YEAR: 2012
PROJECT#28: South 2081h Street Improvements
84"'Avenue South to 96"' Wav South
DESCRIPTION: Rehabilitate the existing pavement to add additional service life to the
I roadway from 84"' Avenue South to 961h Way South. This project will
widen the existing roadway to two 14 foot lanes with the addition of
concrete curb, gutters, sidewalks, storm drainage and illumination The
project will rebuild failing roadway sections near 93rd Avenue and add a
left turn lane from eastbound 108"' Street to northbound 92nd Avenue
South Retaining walls and guardrails will be added as needed.
PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering.................$190,000
Right of Way Acquisition...............$110,000
Construction . . ........... ............... $2,200,000
TOTAL........................................$2,500,000
FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent
1
PROJECT
JUSTIFICATION: South 208ih Street between 84th Avenue South and 96th Way South is a
substandard narrow two-lane roadway that connects 84"' Avenue (East
Valley Highway) Nvith SE 208'h Street. This section of roadway cannot
accommodate the existing and anticipated traffic volumes and is
experiencing pavement and roadway failures that require repair.
Widening of the roadway will necessitate the installation of retaining
walls and guardrails
AIP-Artei ial Improvement Program[State],CMAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FAST—Freight 28
Action Strategy for Evei ett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FMSIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA—
Fedeial Transit Admimstiation[Federal],KES -Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems
[Federal],LID—Local Improvement District,PffTF-Public works Trust Fund Loan[state],STP—Suitace Transportation
Piogiam[Federal], TIA—Transportation Impiovement Account, TIB—Transportation Improvement Board [State], TPP—
` Tiansportation Partnership Program[State]
CITY OF KENT
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
YEAR: 2012
PROJECT 929: 132°d Avenue Southeast Widening—Phase 1
Southeast 288"' Street to Kent Kangley Road (SR 516)
DESCRIPTION: Widen 132nd Avenue Southeast to provide a five lane roadway, including
four general purpose travel lanes, a center left turn lane, and a bicycle
facility, modifying the existing traffic signal system at the intersection of
Kent Kangley Road. The project will include the construction of full
width paving, bicycle lanes, concrete curbs, gutters, and sidewalks, street
lighting, storm drainage; landscaping; utilities and appurtenances
PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering ineerin $1,600,000
g..............
Right of Way Acquisition........... $2,000,000
Construction ......... ....... ..............$7,800,000
TOTAL......................................$11,400,000
FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent
PROJECT
JUSTIFICATION: The level of development along this section of 132nd Avenue has already
reached the point whereby a consistent five lane roadway section is '
desirable to provide safe left-turn access into adjoining properties and
accommodate forecast traffic volumes. The south end of 132' Avenue
Southeast provides alternative access to SR 18. Existing traffic volumes '
that exceed 20,000 ADT (near the intersection of 132"d Avenue Southeast
and Kent Kangley Road) points to a five lane section Sidewalks and
bicycle lanes will provide multimodal access to adjacent land uses.
AIP-Arterial hnpiovement Program[State],CHAQ-Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal];FAST-Freight ?g
Action Snategv foi Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FHSIB-Freight Mobility Strategic investment Board[State],FTA-
Fedcial Transit Admmistation[Federal],HF_S-Hazaid Elimination[Federal],ITS-Intel gentTranspoitaton Systems
[Fedei a]],LID-Local ImprovemenI District,PWTF-Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State],STP-Sin face Tiansportation
Program[Federal], T121-Transportation tmpiovement Account, TIB-Transportation Improvement Board[State], TPP—
Tiansportaton Paimership Program[State]
CITY OF KENT
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
YEAR: 2012
PROJECT 930: 132"d Avenue Southeast Widening—Phase II
Kent Kangley Road (SR 516) to Southeast 248"' Street
DESCRIPTION: Widen 132"d Avenue Southeast to provide a five lane roadway, including
four general purpose travel lanes, a center left-turn lane, and a bicycle
facility, modifying the existing traffic signal systems at the intersections of
Kent Kangley Road and Southeast 256t Street. The project will include
the construction of full-width paving; bicycle lanes; concrete curbs gutters
and sidewalks; street lighting; storm drainage;utilities; and appurtenances,
I PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering..... .......$3,000,000
Right of Way Acquisition............$2,400,000
Construction ............................. $14,800,000
TOTAL......................................$20,2001000
FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent
PROJECT
JUSTIFICATION: The level of development along this section of 132nd Avenue has already
reached the point whereby and consistent five land roadway section if
desirable to provide safe left-turn access into adjoining properties and
accommodate forecast traffic volumes Exlstin�g traffic volumes that
exceed 20,000 ADT (near the intersection of 132" Avenue southeast and
Kent Kangley Road) point to a five lane section. Sidewalks and bicycle
lanes will provide multimodal access to adjacent land uses.
AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State],CMAQ-Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FAST-Freight 30
' Action Stiategy for Eveiett-Seattle-Tacoma Con idor,FMSIB-Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA-
Federal Transit Admimshation[Federal],PIES-Hazard EI"mmation[Federal],ITS-Intelligent Transportation Systems
[Fedeial],LID-Local Improvement District,PIGTF-Public W orl.s Trust Fund Loan[State],ST P-Sin face Transportation
Picgari(Fed eialI,TIA-Transportation Improvement Account, TIB-Transportation Improvement Board(State],TPP-
1 Transportation Partnership Program[State]
CITY OF KENT
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
YEAR: 2012
PROJECT#31: 132nd Avenue Southeast Widening—Phase III
Southeast 248"' Street to Southeast 236'1' Street
DESCRIPTION: Widen 132nd Avenue Southeast to provide a five lane roadway, including
four general purpose travel lanes, a center left-turn lane, and a bicycle
facility; modifying the existing traffic signal system at the intersection of
Southeast 240"' Street. The project will include the construction of frill-
width paving; bicycle lanes; concrete curbs, gutters, and sidewalks; street
lighting, storm drainage, utilities and appurtenances
PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering..............$1,600,000
Right of Way Acquisition...............$700,000
Construction ........ .......................$8,100,000
TOTAL......................................$10,400,000
FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent
PROJECT
JUSTIFICATION: The level of development along this section of 132nd Avenue has already
reached the point whereby a consistent five lane roadway section is
desirable to provide safe left-turn access to adjoining properties and
accommodate forecast traffic volumes. Sidewalks and bicycle lanes will
provide multimodal access to adjacent land uses.
i
AIP- Arterial Improvement Program[State],CAMQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federall,FAST—Freight 31
Action Strategy for Evei ett-Scattle-Tacoma Corridor FAN18—Freight Mobility Strategic Inveshnent Board[State],FTA— '
Federal Tiansit Admimsu ation[Fedeial],f1ES—Hazard Elimination [Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems
[Fedcial],LID—Local Improvement Disn ict,PFVTF—Public Wei ks Trust Fund Loan[State],STP—Sur face Ti anspa tation
Piogram[Federal], TIA—Transportation Improvement Account,T/B—Tiansportation Improvement Soaid[State], TPP—
Tiansportanon Paitneiship Piogiam(State]
I
CITY OF KENT
1 SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
YEAR: 2012
IPROJECT#32: Southeast 256t" Street Widening—Phase III
132nd.]venue Southeast to 148`1'Avenue Southeast
DESCRIPTION: Widen Southeast 250h Street to provide a three-lane roadway, including
two general-purpose travel lanes, a center left-turn lane, and a bicycle
facility, modifying the existing traffic signal systems where appropriate.
Construct a new bridge crossing at Soos Creek and elevate Southeast 256"
1 Street approaches above the 100 year flood plain. The project will include
the construction of full-width paving, bicycle lanes, concrete curbs,
gutters, and sidewalks; bridge; street lighting; storm drainage; utilities and
appurtenances
PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering..............$2,300,000
Right of Way Acquisition............. .$900,000
Construction ..............................$11,600,000
TOTAL......................................$14,800,000
FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent
' PROJECT
JUSTIFICATION: The level of development along this section of Southeast 256t11 Street has
already reached the point whereby a consistent three-lane roadway
section is required to provide safe left-turn access into adjoining
properties and accommodate forecast traffic volumes. With the widening
of Southeast 256t" Street, the bridge at the east end of the project would
need to be replaced and elevated above the 100 year flood plain.
Sidewalks and bicycle lanes will provide safe access for pedestrians and
cyclists The east end of Southeast 256th Street provides an alternative
access to SR 18
AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State], CMAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FAST—Freight 32
' Action Suategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoina Comdni,FMSIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Boaid[State],FTA—
Fedeia]Tians t Administration[Federal], HES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems
[Fedeial],LID—Local Improvement District,PWTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[Slate],STP—Sul face Tiansportation
Program[Federal],TIA—Transportation Improvement Account,TIB—Transportation hnpiovement Board[State], TPP—
Transportation Partneiship Piogram[State]
CITY OF KENT
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
YEAR: 2012
PROJECT #33: South 196tt'/192"d Street Corridor—Phase III
84'I'Avenue South (East valley Highway) to 108"'Avenue SE (SR 515)
DESCRIPTION: Construct a new five lane roadway from 84"' Avenue South (East Valley
Highway) to 108"' Avenue SE (SR 515); including a new bridge over SR
167. Project will include the construction of full-width paving; concrete
curb, gutter and sidewalks; street lighting; storm drainage; landscaping;
utilities and appurtenances.
PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering........ ... .$5,700,000
Right of Way Acquisition............$5,700,000
Construction ..............................$28,600,000
TOTAL......................................$40,000,000
FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent, LID, STP, TIB
PROJECT
JUSTIFICATION: Traffic volumes on existing east-west corridors will exceed the adopted
standards if forecasts of economic and residential growth on the East Hill
of Kent and jut isdictions,to the east of Kent continue as predicted by state
and regional planning agencies. Additional roadway capacity must be
found to accominodate this growth within the urban growth boundaries
This project supports GMA poltctes, helps the City meet its Concurrency
Standards, and augments previous investments in this corridor by
extending its usefulness as a freight corridor and major east-west
connection
AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State], CMAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FAST—Freight 33
Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FMSIB—Freight Mobility Strategic investment Board[State],PTA—
Federal Tiansit Adnumstiation[Federal],HES—Hazard Elimmation[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Tiansportation Systems
[Feder a[],LID—Local Improvement District,PIVTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State],STP—Sin face Transportation
Piogiam[Fedeial], TIA—Transportation Improvement Account, TiB—Transportation Improvement Board[State], TPP—
Transportation Partnership Program[State]
CITY OF KENT
I SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
YEAR: 2007 -2012
I PROJECT #34: State Route 167 Widening
TViden SR 167 fi•oin SR 512 to South 18(1 r Street
DESCRIPTION: City of Kent Engineering and Transportation Planning staff support towards the
Washington State Department of Transportation's project to widen State Route
167 from State Route 512 to South 1goth Street. This project is to include an
additional general purpose lane in each direction and to complete the NOS'
system.
PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering..............$1,200,000
Right of Way Acquisition....... ..................$0 '
Construction ..... ..... . ........... ............$0
TOTAL........................................$1,2009000
FUNDING SOURCE(S): WSDOT, City of Kent
PROJECT
JUSTIFICATION: While this Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) project is
a multi-million dollar improvement consisting of State and RTID funding, the
City of Kent has provided, and will provide, hundreds of hours of transportation
planning, data gathering, and preliminary engineering in support of this critical
transportation corridor. The congestion on SR 167 resulting from inadequate
I capacity creates spillover congestion onto Kent arterials and jeopardizes the
future of our local and regional economy. Kent is the second largest
warehouse/distribution center on the west coast, containing over 40 million
square feet of warehouse/industrial space. Many Kent businesses ship to
national and international customers and need reliable travel time to the ports.
With the planned extension of SR 167 to the Port of Tacoma and planned
completion of SR 509 connecting Kent to the Port of Seattle, this project Avould
complete the freight corridor, shifting thousands of daily truck trips from 15 and
SR 18 to SR 167
AIP-Aitetial Improvement Program[State],CMAQ—Congest ion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FAST—Freight 34
Action Strategy for Eveiett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FMSIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA—
Federal Tiansit Admimsnanon[Federal],IIES—Hazard Elmmation[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems
[Federal],LID—Local Improvement District,PWTF—Public Works Titist Fund Loan[State],STP—Sui face Tianspoitation
Piogiam[Federal], TIA—Tiansportation Improvement Account, TIB—Tiansportation Improoenient Board [State], TPP-
1 Tianspmtation Partneiship Piogiam[State]
CITY OF KENT
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
YEAR: 2007- 2012
PROJECT #35: Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements
Ongoing Citywide Program
DESCRIPTION: Make miscellaneous improvements to the city's pedestrian network and
bicycle routes as Identified tin the Nonmotorized Element of the
Transportation Master Plan.
PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering...................$60,000
Right of Way Acquisition..........................$0 t
Construction ............. .....................$562,000
TOTAL...........................................$622,000
FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent
PROJECT
JUSTIFICATION: This project can help achieve the City's transportation goals for
improving mobility and safe access for walking and bicycling. The
project complies with the City's Commute Trip Reduction Ordinance by
promoting non-motonzed travel to employment centers, commercial
districts, transit stations, schools and civic centers, and recreational
destinations Walking can be a practical alternative to driving, especially
for short trips and contributes greatly to neighborhood quality and
vitality. Pedestrian improvements to streets, intersections, sidewalks, and
other facilities can improve access and safety Such facilities are
particularly important for children, senior citizens, and people with
disabilities. This project also leverages opportunities to enhance safe
walking routes to schools for children.
i
ALP-Arterial Impi ovement Program[State]; CMAO-Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FAST-Freight 35
Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FMSIB-Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA- '
Federal Ti ansit Administration[Federal],LIES-Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS-Intelligent Transportation Systems
[Federal],LID -Local improvement District,P6i'TF-Public Woiks Trust Fund Loan[State],STP-Surface Tiansportation
Progiam[Federal],71A-Ti ansportation Improvement Account, TIB-Transportation Improvement Hoard[State], TPP—
Tiansportation Partnership Piogiam[State]
' CITY OF KENT
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
1 YEAR: 2007 - 2012
PROJECT#36: Guardrail and Safety Improvements
Ongoing Citywide Program
DESCRIPTION: Make miscellaneous guardrail improvements each year to enhance
motorist safety. Candidate projects include Frager Road and 100t1i Avenue
Southeast (near the 22600 block). Upgrade existing guardrail end-
treatments as mandated by State and Federal regulations
PROJECT COST: Pre]iminary Engineering...................$20,000
Right of Way Acquisition................... . . ..$0
1 Construction ...................................S175,000
TOTAL...........................................$195,000
FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent, HES
' PROJECT
JUSTIFICATION: This project is mandated by compliance with Federal and State
regulations and the requirement to eliminate potentially hazardous
roadway conditions.
1
1
AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State],CMAO-Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal].FAST-Freight 36
Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FUSIB-Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board [State],FTA-
Federal Tiansit Administration[Federal],IIL'S-Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS-Intelligent Transportation Systems
[Federal], LID-Local Improvement District,PWTF-Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State],STP-Surface Tiansportation
Progiarn[Federal], TIA-Transportation Improvement Account, TIB-Transportation Improvement Board [State], TPP—
' Tianspoitation Partnership Piogram[State]
CITY OF KENT
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM '
YEAR: 2007 - 2012
PROJECT #37: Community Based Circulating Shuttles
Ongoing Citvwide Programs
DESCRIPTION: Continue to provide enhanced transit service to meet the needs of the
community through the use of fixed-route shuttle service, with demand-
responsive routing capabilities Routes 914,1916 serve the Kent Transit
Center, Regional Justice Center, Kent City Hall, Green River Community
College's Kent campus, and local shopping and medical facilities. The
City plans to add two new routes to demonstrate the value of circulator
transit service comiecting residential areas of the east and west hills with '
the regional bus and commuter train services at the Kent Transit Center.
PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering............................$0
Right of Way Acquisition..........................$0
Construction ... . . . ........................$840,000
TOTAL...........................................$840,000
FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent, King County, ITS
PROJECT
JUSTIFICATION: Routes 914/916 provide mobility and independence to many of the city's
seniors and reduce the need for expensive ACCESS service for many
wheelchair-lift service trips. Community circulating shuttles encourage
the participation of all ages, all economic groups, all physical abilities,
and virtually all of our community in everyday civic life without the
isolation acid pollution of the automobile for every trip. Commuter
shuttles enhance the regional transtt/tram service by providing the vital
link from the home to the Transit Center and from the Transit Center to
the workplace, encouraging people to leave their vehicles at home,
avoiding the cold start impacts to air quality and reducing congestion on
local streets.
AiP-Arterial Improvement Program[State];CMAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FAST—Freight 37
Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FMSI&—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA— ,
Federal Tiansrt Admimsti ation[Federal],LIES—Hazard Elimmation [Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems
[Fedeial],LID—Local Impiovement District,PIYTF—Public works Trust Fund Loan[State],STP—Sui face Tiansportation
Piogram[Fedeial], Nei—Transportation Improvement Account,Tl6—Transportation Improvement Board[State]; TPP—
Ti anspoi tation Pai tnership Program[State]
CITY OF KENT
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
YEAR: 2007- 2012
PROJECT I#38: Americans with Disabilities Act Compliance Sidewalk Repair and
Rehabilitation
Ongoing Citywide Program
1 DESCRIPTION: Reconstruct and repair existing sidewalks and curb ramps and install new
truncated domes and hard-surfaced sidewalks to implement and
1 requirements of the Federal Arnencans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
consistent with the findings of the Nomnotonzed Element of the
Transportation Master Plan.
PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering.................$200,000
tRight of Way Acqutsition......................... $0
Construction .. .............................$1,750,000
' TOTAL........................................$11950,000
FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent
PROJECT
JUSTIFICATION: This project is mandated by Title II of the Americans with Disabilities
Act. Title 11 requires that a public entity must evaluate its services,
programs, policies, and practices to determine whether they are in
compliance with the nondiscrimination requirements of the ADA. The
ADA requires that an ADA Transition Plan be prepared to describe any
structural or physical changes required to make programs accessible. The
City of Kent has conducted a self evaluation and prepared a Transition
Plan including a prioritized list of projects to bring itself into compliance
with the Federal ADA regulations This program begins working on that
list of projects to reconstruct and repair the City's sidewalk and
street/sidewalk transition zones for accessibility for all citizens.
AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State].CMAQ-Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal];FAST-Freight 38
' Action Strategy Cot Fvetett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FUSIB-Freight Mobility Strategic investment Board[State],FTA-
Fed eial Transit Administration[Fedeiall,HES-Hazard Elmimation[Federal],ITS-Intelligent Transportation Systems
[Fedeial],LTD-Local Improvement District,P14,7F-Public Works Tiust Fund Loan[State],STP-Surface Tiansportation
Program[Federal],TIA-Tiansportatton Imptovement Account,TIB-Transportation Improvement Board[State], TPP—
Transportation Partnership Progiam[State]
CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON
SIX-YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM
2007 - 2012 ,
KENT
W A S H I N G T O N '
For more information or additional copies of this document contact:
Steve Mullen, Transportation Engineering Manager
City of Kent, Public Works, Engineering
220 Fourth Avenue South
Kent, WA 98032-5895
(253) 856-5585
smullen(cb-ci_kent.wa.us
39
' Kent City Council Meeting
Date August 1, 2006
Category Other Business
1. SUBJECT: VALLEY VIEW REZONE (QUASI-JUDICIAL PROCEEDING)
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: The proposed ordinance relates to land use and
zoning, specifically the rezoning of two parcels totaling 3.97 acres of property from
SR-4 5 (Single-Family Residential), to SR-6 (Single-Family Residential) The property
is located at 20433 and 20541 92A Avenue South. The Kent Hearing Examiner held a
Public Hearing on June 21, 2006, and issued Findings, Conclusions, and a
Recommendation for approval on July 6, 2006.
3. EXHIBITS: Ordinance; Hearing Examiner Findings, Conclusions and
Recommendation; Staff report with map; and Determination of Nonsignificance
4. RECOMMENDED BY: Hearing Examiner
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. FISCAL IMPACT
Expenditure" No Revenue? No
Currently in the Budget? Yes No
If no
' Unbudgeted Expense: Fund Amount $
Unbudgeted Revenue: Fund Amount $
6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councdmember moves, Councilmember seconds
1
to accept/;-��the Findings, Conclusio s, and Recommendation of the Hearing
Examiner and to adopt Ordinance No. relating to the Valley View Rezone.
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
' Item No 7A
ORDINANCE NO.
' AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City
of Kent, Washington, relating to land use and zoning,
' specifically the rezoning of approximately 3.97 acres of
property located at 20433 and 20541 92nd Avenue
South, from SR-4.5 (Single-Family Residential, 4.5 units
per acre) to SR-6 (Single-Family Residential, 6 units per
acre). (Valley View Rezone, #RZ-2005-12)
' RECITALS
' A. An application was Bled on September 12, 2005, by Omied Pazooki
to rezone approximately 3.97 acres of property located at 20433 and 20541 92nd
Avenue South, in Kent, Washington, from the current zoning of SR-4.5 (Single-
Family Residential, 4.5 units per acre) to SR-6 (Single-Family Residential, 6 units
per acre). (Valley View Rezone, #RZ-2005-12).
B. The City's SEPA responsible official issued a Mitigated Determination
' of Nonsignificance (MDNS) (#ENV-2005-58) for the proposed rezone on May 19,
2006, and a Revised MDNS on June 2, 2006.
' C. A public hearing on the rezone was held before the hearing
' examiner on June 21, 2006. On July 6, 2006, the hearing examiner issued
findings and conclusions that the Valley View Rezone is consistent with the city's
Comprehensive Plan; that the proposed rezone and subsequent development
activity would be compatible with the development in the vicinity; that the
proposed rezone will not unduly burden the transportation system in the vicinity of
' the property with significant adverse impacts that cannot be mitigated; that
circumstances have changed since the establishment of the current zoning district
' to warrant the proposed rezone; and that the proposed rezone will not adversely
affect the health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Kent.
1 Valley View Rezone
D. Based on these findings and conclusions, the hearing examiner
recommended approval of the Valley View Rezone.
E. On August 1, 2006, the City Council determined that the hearing '
examiner's findings and conclusions are consistent with sections 15.09.050(A)(3)
and 15.09.050(C) of the Kent City Code, accepted the findings of the hearing '
examiner, and adopted the hearing examiner's recommendation for approval of the
Valley View Rezone from SR-4.5 to SR-6.
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, '
WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
ORDINANCE
SECTION 1. - Rezone. The property located at 20433 and 20541 92nd
Avenue South, in Kent, Washington consisting of approximately 3.97 acres
depicted in Exhibit "A" (marked "Vicinity Map"), attached and incorporated by this
reference, and legally described in Exhibit "B", attached and incorporated by this
reference, is rezoned from SR-4.5 (Single-Family Residential, 4.5 units per acre) to '
SR-6 (Single-Family Residential, 6 units per acre). The City of Kent zoning map
shall be amended to reflect the rezone granted above.
SECTION 2. - Severability. If any one or more sections, sub-sections, or
sentences of this ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision '
shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance and the same
shall remain in full force and effect. '
SECTION 3. - Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in ,
force five (5) days from and after its publication as provided by law.
SUZETTE COOKE, MAYOR ,
2 Valley View Rezone
' ATTEST:
' BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
' TOM BRUBAKER, CITY ATTORNEY
PASSED: day of August, 2006.
' APPROVED: day of August, 2006.
PUBLISHED: day of August, 2006.
' I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No.
passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, and approved by the
Mayor of the City of Kent as hereon indicated.
(SEAL)
' BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK
P\Civil\Ordinance\Rezone-ValleyView doc
1
' 3 Valley View Rezone
E � -
. ••11 '.l.' :•f�1Rt.i`, .i I••��Y• " �(P q�.,.Q �t
it ..•. - n .• •� .
ST
��' •el' �# ,ram ..' 07H ST`
IJ
PL
■ :,.� �:`. •.`„..: 'k- Yam, . . � .�, ``•
�3 1:[x��#Tq k�• .
'""" = �.., -•- //��� ' ,fie i s :kr,V_
'` •,;�V �.'� t ��•\�,,.�- � .,. @' .." .• .3',Y ,` Lit{ , ,
ST
o ++ k 12 ." 2VON
u•koat�
Ln on
�I
I14
s f-----1 4 k
Dr
Q
t� V is � e s .
fif lie
ID to i 7 6fir lir __ifr Or
br
I
APPLICATION NAME:VALLEY VIEW
REQUEST: REZONE#RZ-2005-12 AND PRELIMINARY PLAT#SU-2005-15
VICINITY AND SITE MAP EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCUMON• ti
Beginning at a point which is north O'321330 East 829.05 feet from the
South quarter section corner of Section 6, Township 21 North, Range 5
Eaat, N.N. , in King County, Washington, said point being on the North
and South centerline of said Section 6;
TAMCE North 00424330 East 301.03 feat;
THENCE North 99.531051 West 572.54 feet;
THORCE South x035'05• East 302.02 feet;
THENCE South 89053.05" West $60.45 feet, more or leaa, to the point of
beginning;
EXCEPT the North 135.02 feet, more or less;
AND EXCEPT 92nd Avenue South.
Situate in the County of King, State of Washington.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: *{ Z
That portion of the Southeast quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section
6, Township 22 North, Range 5 East, W.H. , in Icing County, washington,
described as follows:
BEGINNING at a point 4hich is North 0142123" East 829.05 feet from the
South quarter section corner of Section 6;
THENCE South 0042123^ Went 158 feet;
THENCE Vorth 99653,051 West 554. 13 feat;
THENCE North 16351050 Want 1S8.06 feet, more or less, to a point from
which the point of beginning boars South 89153.054 East;
THF2 = South 69.53,05, East 560.45 feet, more or loss, to the point of
beginning;
EXCEPT County Road.
Situate in the County of King, State of Washington.
EXHIBIT "B"
ti
. i
OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
Theodore P. Hunter
Hearing Examiner
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION
FILE NO: VALLEY VIEW
#RZ-2005-12 KIVA #2053391
APPLICANT: Omied Pazooki
5624 117`h Avenue SE
Bellevue, WA 98006
RE UEST: A zoning map amendment to rezone tax parcel
numbers 0622059056 and 0622059036 from SR-4 5
(Single-Family Residential, maximum density 4 53
dwelling units per acre) to SR-6 (Single-Family
Residential, maximum density 605 dwelling units
per acre)
LOCATION: 20433 and 20541 92nd Avenue S. South, located just
east of the Valley Freeway, SR-167, Kent, WA
APPLICATION FILED: September 12, 2005
MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF
NONSIGNIFICANCE ISSUED: May 19, 2006 and revised on
June 2, 2006 (#ENV-2005-58)
HEARING DATE: June 21, 2006
RECOMMENDATION ISSUED: July 6, 2006
1 RECOMMENDATION: APPROVE
STAFF REPRESENTATIVE: Matt Gilbert, Planning Services
PUBLIC TESTIMONY: Matt Gilbert, Planning Services
Brendan Madden, representing applicant
EXHIBITS: 1. Staff File with the following attachments:
A. Staff Report for Hearing Examiner Meeting of
June 7, 2006
i
Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation
Heanng Examiner for the City of Kent
Valley View Rezone
#RZ-2005-12(KIVA #RPP4-2053391)
Page 1 of 7
B. Preliminary Plat Application
C Correspondence
D. Department Routing
E. Public Notice Documents, including affidavits of notice, publication
notice and mailing list
F. Notice of Completeness; Notice of Application
G. Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance dated April 21, 2006
and Environmental Checklist
The Hearing Examiner enters the following Findings and Conclusions based upon the testimony t
and exhibits admitted at the open record hearing:
FINDINGS
1. The Applicant requested a zoning map amendment to rezone two parcels' from SR-4.5
(Single-Family Residential, maximum density 4.53 dwelling units per acre) to SR-6
(Single-Family Residential, maximum density 6.05 dwelling units per acre).Z The two
parcels include approximately 3.97 acres and are located at 20433 and 205431 92n1
Avenue South, Kent, WA, lust east of the Valley Freeway, SR-167. Exhibit 1,
Attachment A, Staff Report, p. 2;Attachment H, Valley View(Preliminary Plat).
2. The subject property was annexed to the City of Kent on March 15, 1959 (Ordinance No.
320). The City established the SF-6 Comprehensive Plan designation and SR-4 5 Zoning
designation for several properties along 92"d Avenue as part of its 2004 update of the
City's Comprehensive Plan (Ordinance 3698). Exhibit 1, Attachment A, Staff Report,
page 3.
3. Most of the surrounding developed properties are located in the SR-6 zoning district.
Properties to the north were recently rezoned from SR 4.5 to SR-6 (Brennas Vista
R/Sophia Glenn #RZ 2005-1). Property to the east is zoned SR-6, while properties
located to the south are currently zoned SR 4.5 and SR-6. A subdivision of the 22.3
acres north of the subject site is currently under City review and generally proposes
development of near minimum area lots and maximum achievable density for the SR-6
zone. The City is currently processing a SR-4.5 to SR-6 rezone and recently reviewed a
tentative plat application for one of the southern adjacent parcels. Exhibit 1,
Attachment A, Staff Report, pages 2 and 3. Testimony of Matt Gilbert.
The King County tax parcel numbers are 0622059036 and 0622059056 A legal description is provided on the
preliminary plat associated with this rezone request Exhibit 1, Attachment A, Staff Report,page 2, AttachmentH,
Valley View(Preliminary Plat)
2 The Applicant submitted applications for both a rezone(#RZ-2005-12 K1VA4 2053391)and subdivision(#SU-
2005-16 KIVA#2053388)of the subject site on September 12,2005 Because the Hearing Examiner must make a
recommendation to the City Counul on the rezone in contrast to a decision on the subdivision,the rezone hearing
was heard separately and has its own findings, conclusion and recommendation
Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation
Hearing Examiner for the Oty of Kent
Valley View Rezone
#RZ-2005-I2(KIVA #RPP4-2053391)
Page 2 of 7
4. The City of Kent Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designates the subject property as
Single Family Residential, six dwelling units per acre (SF-6). The zoning designation of
SR-6 is allowed within the SF-6 Comprehensive Plan designation. Although the existing
SR-4.5 zoning designation is also compatible with the SF-6 Comprehensive Plan
designation, the City Planner testified that the SR-6 zoning designation is appropriate for
the subject property because it allows for greater flexibility in the layout of proposed lots
for a plat. Exhibit 1, Staff Report, pages 3 and 15; City of Kent Comprehensive Plan,
Land Use Element—Land Use Map, Table 4.1, Testimony of Matt Gilbert.
5. The City of Kent Comprehensive Plan contains the following goals and policies that are
relevant to the rezone application:
Goal H-2: Promote the organization and enhancement of neighborhoods,
and provide the opportunity for comfortable and well-maintained housing
for all citizens.
Policy H-2.7: Continue to utilize regulatory measures to control impacts of
residential development on the environment and on water quality. . .
Goal LU-9: Provide adequate land and densities to accommodate the
adopted 20 year housing target of 4,284 new dwelling units within existing
city limits . .
Policy LU-9.1: Where appropriate, establish urban residential densities of
at least four (4) units per net developable acre in order to adequately
support urban densities.
Policy LU-9.4: Locate housing opportunities with a variety of densities
within close proximity to employment, shopping, transit, and where
possible, near human and community services.
Goal LU-10:
Provide opportunities for a variety of housing types, options, and densities
throughout the City . to meet the housing needs of the Region's changing
demographics.
Policy LU-10.4: Allow single family housing on a variety of lot sizes. Locate
smaller lot sizes within close proximity to the Urban Center or Activity
Centers wherever possible.
Goal LU-20: Protect and enhance environmentally sensitive areas via
the adoption of the City regulations and programs which encourage well-
designed land use patterns such as clustering and planned unit
development. Use such land use patterns to concentrate higher urban land
use densities and intensity of uses in specified areas in order to preserve
natural features such as large wetlands, streams, steep slopes, and forests.
Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation
Hearing Examiner for the City of Kent
Valley View Rezone
#RZ-2005-12(KIVA #RPP4-2053391)
Page 3 of 7
Goal LU-22: Ensure that the City's environmental policies and
regulations comply with state and federal environmental protection
regulations regarding air and water quality, noise and wildlife and fisheries
resources and habitat protection. Demonstrate support for environmental
quality in land use plans, development regulations, and site plan review to
ensure that local land use management is consistent with the City's overall
natural resource goals.
Policy TR1.2: Coordinate new commercial and residential development in
Kent with transportation projects to assure that transportation facility
capacity is sufficient to accommodate the new development, or a financial
commitment is in place to meet the adopted standard within six years,
before allowing it to proceed.
Policy TR-1.5: Ensure consistency between land use and transportation
plans so that land use and adjacent transportation facilities are compatible.
The proposed rezone supports these goals and policies in that existing urban services
and infrastructure serve the subject property. The density allowed by the rezone would
accommodate additional households pursuant to the 20-year time horizon provided for
in the Comprehensive Plan without converting single-family residential lands to
multifamily residential lands. Exhibit 1, Attachment A, Staff Report, page 7. Testimony
of Matt Gilbert.
6. Circumstances have changed since the City established the current zoning district. The
City amended its Comprehensive Plan in 2004 and established the SF-6 Comprehensive
Plan designation and SR-4.5 zoning designation for this area. The City Council passed
an updated Critical Area Ordinance (CAO) in 2005. The new CAO allows more flexibility
through a detailed geotechnical review process with site specific analysis. In early 2006,
the City Council approved a rezone of the 22 acres north of the Valley View site from
SR-4.5 to SR-6. Exhibit 1, Attachment A, Staff Report, pages 16 and 17. Testimony of
Matt Gilbert.
7. Based on the gross acreage of the subject property, the maximum number of dwelling
units that could be developed under current SR-4.5 zoning is 17 single family units and
the maximum number of dwelling units that could be developed under the proposed SR-
6 zoning is 23. Mr. Madden testified that he submitted the rezone application because
roads and the detention pond for the proposed subdivision removed buildable land from
the site leaving a density of 4.53 dwelling units per acre that exceeds the SSR-4.5
zoning. With the rezone, smaller lot sizes will be available as is consistent with the SR-6
zoning. The Applicant's environmental checklist discloses a proposal to divide the
subject property into 18 single-family residential lots. Exhibit 1, Attachment A, Staff
Report, p. 2; Attachment G (Environmental Checklist) page 4. Testimony of Brendan
Madden.
Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation
Hearing Examiner for the City of Kent
Valley View Rezone
#RZ-2005-12(KIVA #RPP4-2053391)
Page 4 of 7
8. The proposed rezone, in and of itself, would not add traffic to the local to the local
street system. The traffic impact of future development of the subject property would
be mitigated through a Traffic Impact Study and payment of traffic mitigation fees. The
City Planner testified that the MDNS condition regarding transportation impacts applies
to the rezone to address general traffic impacts related to development generally, not
the plat specifically. Exhibit 1, Attachment G(MDNS), p. 2. Testimony of Matt Gilbert.
Testimony of Brendan Madden.
9 The City of Kent acted as lead agency for review of environmental impacts caused by
the proposal. The Applicant submitted applications for subdivision and rezone of the
subject site on September 12, 2005. The City, issued a Mitigated Determination of
I Nonsignificance (MDNS) for the rezone, as well as for the subdivision on May 19, 2006
(revised on June 1, 2006).3 The MDNS was not appealed.4 Exhibit 1, Attachment A,
Staff Report, pages 3 and 4;Attachment G(MDNS). Testimony of Matt Gilbert:
10. Notice of the open record hearing was posted on the property, mailed to properties
within 300 feet of the site, and published in King County>ournal in accordance with City
ordinances. Exhibit 1, Attachment C.
11. Other than the City Staff planner and the applicant, there was no other testimony or
public comment at the hearing.
CONCLUSIONS
Jurisdiction
The Hearing Examiner has jurisdiction to hold an open record hearing on this quasi-judicial
rezone and to issue a written recommendation for final action to the Council, pursuant to RCW
35A.63.170 and Chapters 2.32 and 15.09 of the Kent City Code.
Criteria for Review
Section 15.09.050(C) of the Kent Zoning Code sets forth the standards and enteria the Hearing
Examiner must use to evaluate a request for a rezone A request for a rezone shall only be
granted if:
3 It is noted that a bifurcated environmental review process would still be appropriate under certain circumstances,
such as when a rezone is not directly attached to a particular development proposal that has been filed with the City.
It is recognized that the preparation of detailed project plans may be costly,and a developer may wish to obtain a
decision on a rezone prior to submitting detailed project plans However, in this case the developer has already
submitted a complete preliminary plat application
a The City Planner testified that the City reviewed the rezone using a project rezone approach As recognized by the
Washington Supreme Court, the impacts of a specific development proposal can serve as a useful yardstick for
measuring the impacts of a rezone See Citizens Alliance v Auburn 126 Wn 2d, 356, 365 (1995) A combined
threshold determmation is consistent with KCC 12 01 030(D),promotes the policies of SEPA,and is a more
efficient use of City,applicant and public resources
Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation
Hearing Examiner for the City of Kent
Valley View Rezone
#RZ-2005-12(KIVA #RPP4-2053391)
Page 5 of 7
a. The proposed rezone is consistent with the comprehensive plan;
b. The proposed rezone and subsequent development of the site would be
compatible with development in the vicinity;
c The proposed rezone will not unduly burden the transportation system in the
vicinity of the property with significant adverse impacts which cannot be
mitigated;
d. Circumstances have changed substantially since the establishment of the current
zoning district to warrant the proposed rezone,
e. The proposed rezone will not adversely affect the health, safety and general
welfare of the citizens of the city
Conclusions Based on Findings
1. The proposed rezone is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive
Plan designates the subject property and all surrounding properties as SF-6. The
additional density allowed by the rezone would support the policies of the
Comprehensive Plan Findings Nos 3, 4, 5, 7, 8.
2. The proposed rezone and subsequent development of the site would be compatible T
with development in the vicinity. Existing and authorized land uses in the vicinity of
the site are single-family residential. The properties to the north and east are zoned for
residential development at the same density as requested by the Applicant Properties to
the south of the site are zoned SR 4 5 and SR-6. Future development of the subject
property would be compatible with existing and planned development in the vicinity of
subject property. Findings No 3, 4, 6
3. The proposed rezone would not unduly burden the transportation system in the
vicinity of the property with significant adverse impacts that cannot be mitigated.
The rezone itself would not generate any traffic. The traffic impact of future development
of the subject property would be mitigated through a Traffic Impact Study and payment
of traffic mitigation fees. Finding No. 8.
4. Circumstances have changed substantially since the establishment of the current
zoning district. In considering a rezone, the Applicant has the burden of proof in
demonstrating that conditions have substantially changed since the original zoning and
that the rezone bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, morals, or
general welfare Parkridge v Seattle, 89 Wn.2d 454 (1978). A variety of factors may be
utilized to satisfy a change in circumstances including changes in public opinion, local
land use patterns, and changes on the property itself Blarnson v Kitsap County, 78 Wn.
Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation
Hearing Examiner for the City of Kent
Valley View Rezone
#RZ-2005-12(KIVA #RPP4-2053391)
Page 6 of
App 840, 846 (1995). The proposed rezone is supported by changes in surrounding
residential zoning and development to conform to the SF-6 Comprehensive Plan
designation and by the City Council's passage of an updated Critical Area Ordinance
Findings No. 6
5. The proposed rezone would not adversely affect the health, safety and general
welfare of the citizens of the City of Kent. Allowed land uses under both the current
and proposed zoning designations are exclusively residential. No adverse impacts were
identified durmg the environmental review process Other then testimony by the City
planner and the Applicant, there was no public comment on the rezone application at the
public hearing. Findings Nos 3, 4, 8, 9, 10, 11.
RECOMMENDATION
Based upon the preceding Findings and Conclusions, the Hearing Examiner recommends that the
application for a rezone of King County Tax Parcel number 0622059056 and 0622059036 from
SR-4.5 to SR-6 be APPROVED.
DATED this 6th day of July 2006.
THEODORE PAUL HUNTER
Hearing Examiner
Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation
Heanng Examiner for the Co of Kent
Valley View Rezone
#RZ-2005-12(KIVA #RPP4-2053391)
Page 7 of
Staff Report
Valley View Rezone and Subdivision
#RZ-2005-12 KIVA #RPP4-2053391
#SU-2005-16 KIVA #RPP3-2053388 r
and revised on June 1, 2006. One condition related to mitigation of vehicle trips
on the local roadway network was associated with the MDNS. No public
comments were received in association with the SEPA process.
B. Significant Physical Features
Topography. Wetlands and Vegetation
The site slopes down from east to west at about 14%. A localized area of 40%
slopes exists along the northern property line that will be regraded prior to
development.
A wide range of vegetation exists on the subject site. Deciduous and evergreen
trees, shrubs and grasses have all been identified in various plant communities.
The applicant has indicated that up to 70% of the site may be covered with
impervious surface, as allowed by the zoning code. The applicant will submit a
survey of significant on-site trees and, as part of civil construction plan review,
will be required to submit and receive approval of a detailed tree plan that
shows trees to be retained.
No wetlands, streams or associated buffers have been identified as
encumbering the site.
C. Significant Social Features
1. Street System
The proposed development project is located within the East Hill area of
the City and will take its primary access from 92'6 Avenue South. This
public street has an existing public right-of-way width of about 60-feet,
while the asphalt street width is currently about 22-feet wide. The
existing street provides for two narrow lanes of traffic, but does not
include the following other improvements: cement concrete curbs &
gutters; stormwater drainage system; cement concrete sidewalks; or a
street lighting system. The existing asphalt pavement section of this 1
portion of the street is inadequate to provide an expected 20-year t
service life and may be in need of an asphalt overlay/rebuild in order to
maintain an acceptable level of service while accommodating the
increased volume of trips being generated by this proposal.
92nd Avenue South is classified as a Residential Collector Arterial Street
with Bike Lanes within the City's Comprehensive Plan and will require: a
minimum of 70-feet of public right-of-way; a 44-foot wide asphalt
roadway with three traffic lanes, plus two 5-foot wide in-street bike
lanes; cement concrete curbs & gutters, a 5-foot wide planter strip, and
Page 4 of 30
I
Staff Report
Valley View Rezone and Subdivision
#RZ-2005-12 KIVA #RPP4-2053391
#SU-2005-16 KIVA #RPP3-2053388
5-foot wide cement concrete sidewalks on both sides of the street; a
stormwater drainage system; a City-approved street lighting system;
public utilities, and other street appurtenances when fully improved.
As stated in the SEPA decision document, the proposed subdivision
development will cause incremental but cumulatively significant,
additional impacts to the regional and local transportation systems --
demonstrated, in part, as additional traffic congestion at the
intersections of: 92nd Avenue South at South 200`h Street, 92Id Avenue
South at South 202nd Street, 92"d Avenue South at South 2081h Street
and South 208th Street at 841h Avenue North / East Valley Highway
This Proposed Valley View subdivision abuts the southern boundary of
the Sophia Glenn Preliminary Subdivision, which is currently under City
review. In order to achieve roadway connectivity, the proposed
north/south roadways of Valley View and Sophia Glenn will be required
to match at the common boundary, along the north property line of the
subject site. Due to the complex site grading associated with each of
these proposals, close design coordination will be necessary.
1 Coordination will also be required to achieve connectivity of other utility
systems. To this end, the applicants for the Valley View and Sophia
Glenn projects have each retained Barghausen Consulting Engineers to
prepare design drawings. The applicant will also need to work closely
with the City's Public Works Department to achieve this coordination.
This development is within an area which is characterized by streets with
narrow traffic lanes and narrow or no shoulders, and the area has been
identified as having substandard pedestrian facilities.
2. Water System
The site is located within the Soos Creek Water and Sewer District. The
applicant has provided a Certificate of Water and Sewer Availability from
this agency.
I3. Sanitary Sewer System
The site is located within the Soos Creek Water and Sewer District. The
applicant has provided a Certificate of Water and Sewer Availability from
this agency.
4. Stormwater System
I A stormwater system will be necessary to accommodate the proposed
development. The applicant has submitted a preliminary drainage
Page 5 of 30
Staff Report
Valley View Rezone and Subdivision
#RZ-2005-12 KIVA #RPP4-2053391
#SU-2005-16 KIVA #RPP3-2053388
analysis which supports the location and size of the proposed storm
drainage tract. Prior to development of the site the applicant will be
required to submit complete drainage plans prepared in accordance with
the 2002 City of Kent Surface Water Design Manual and the 1998 King '
County Surface Water Design Manual.
As the on-site stormwater will ultimately discharge into the Garrison
Creek channel, located within the SR-167 right-of-way, the applicant will
need to receive approval from the Washington State Department of
Transportation prior to construction of the stormwater system.
III. CONSULTED DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES
The following departments and agencies were advised of these applications:
Chief Administrative Officer Police Department
Director of Public Works Fire Chief ,
Parks & Recreation Director City Clerk
City Attorney Kent School District
U.S Post Master WA State Dept. of Ecology
Washington State DOT K. C. Wastewater Treatment
Puget Sound Energy King Co. Environmental Health
Qwest King Co. Transit Division
Soos Creek Water & Sewer Dist.
In addition to the above, all persons owning property located within 300 feet of the site
were notified of the application and of the public hearing. No public comments were
received regarding this proposal.
Comments received from the above listed agencies and departments have been
incorporated in the staff report where applicable.
IV. PLANNING SERVICES REVIEW
A. Comprehensive Plan
The City of Kent has adopted a revised Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the
Growth Management Act (Ordinance #3698 — July 2004). The goals and
policies of the Comprehensive Plan represent an expression of community
intentions and aspirations concerning the future of Kent and the area within the
potential annexation area. The Comprehensive Plan is used by the Mayor, City
Council, Land Use and Planning Board, Hearing Examiner and City departments
to guide decision-making relative to development and capital facility spending.
Page 6 of 30
Staff Report
Valley View Rezone and Subdivision
#RZ-2005-12 KIVA #RPP4-2053391
#SU-2005-16 KIVA #RPP3-2053388
The City of Kent Comprehensive Plan is comprised of eleven elements which
contain written goals and policies as well as a land use map. The proposed
subdivision supports several goals and policies in the Land Use element, most
notably goals LU-1 and LU-8, and policies LU 1.1 and LU 8.1. The proposed plat
is located near existing urban services and infrastructure. The City supports the
development of close-in vacant or underdeveloped properties which limits
further urban sprawl on the edges of the planning area. In addition, in-fill
development provides a more efficient means of providing services and
enhancing pedestrian mobility. Also, one of the objectives of the
comprehensive plan is to provide a wide variety of housing types and
opportunities to accommodate projected population growth without converting
single family lands to multifamily residential. Development of single family
subdivisions on underdeveloped, single family zoned land is consistent with this
objective.
Upon reviewing the subdivision map for the Valley View Preliminary Subdivision
development, it has been determined that the proposed development will cause
incremental but cumulatively significant, additional impacts to the regional and
local transportation systems.
Additional incremental, but cumulatively significant, impacts will be created to
stormwater quantity, stormwater quality, stormwater detention and conveyance
facilities, utility transmission facilities, sanitary sewage and domestic potable
water conveyance systems.
Compliance with City of Kent's 'Public Works Ordinance' and the State of
Washington's Growth Management Act will require concurrent improvement --
or the execution of binding agreements by the Owner / Subdivider with the City
of Kent, for participation in future public improvement projects-of roadways,
pedestrian and bicycle circulation systems, intersection and intersection traffic
signals, stormwater detention, stormwater treatment, and stormwater
conveyance, utility, sanitary sewage, and domestic potable water systems.
LAND USE ELEMENT
The Land Use Element of the plan contains a Land Use Plan Map, which
designates the type and intensity of land uses throughout the city, as well as in
the entire potential annexation area. The Land Use Plan Map designates the
subject property as SF-6, Single Family Residential which allows six units per
acre. In addition to the Land Use Plan Map, the Land Use Element also
contains goals and policies relating to the location, density, and design of future
development in the City and in the Potential Annexation Area.
Page 7 of 30
i
Staff Report ,
Valley View Rezone and Subdivision
#RZ-2005-12 KIVA #RPP4-2053391
#SU-2005-16 KIVA #RPP3-2053388
Overall Goal: Encourage a future growth and development pattern which
implements the community's vision, protects environmentally sensitive areas,
and enhances the quality of life of all of Kent's residents.
Policy LU-8.1: Provide in the land use plan adequate land and densities to '
accommodate both city and county housing targets within the Potential
Annexation Area. Average net residential densities throughout the Potential
Annexation Area should be at least four units per acre in order to adequately
support urban services.
Policy LU-8.3: Locate housing opportunities within close proximity to
employment, shopping, transit and human and community services.
Goal LU-9: Provide opportunities for a variety of housing types, options, and
densities throughout the city and the Potential Annexation Area.
Policy LU-9.4: Allow single family housing on a variety of lot sizes, including
5,000 square foot lots. Locate smaller lot sizes within close proximity to the
urban activity centers.
Planning Services Comment:
The proposed rezone and subdivision are supported by relevant goals and
policies contained within the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan. The
development proposed through this subdivision request seeks to establish
residential lots at a net density of approximately 6.3 units per acre, which is
sufficient to support urban services. The proposed location is easily served by
existing urban services and is in convenient proximity to commercial areas along
East Valley Highway. Also, the proposed rezone is consistent with the Land Use
Plan Map, which allows up to six dwelling units per gross acre on the proposed
rezone parcel.
HOUSING ELEMENT
The primary goal of the housing element is to meet the current and future need ,
for housing in the Kent area.
Overall Goal: Ensure opportunities for affordable housing and an appropriate
living environment for Kent citizens.
Goal H-1: Promote healthy neighborhoods by providing a wide range of
housing options throughout the community that are accessible to community
and human services, employment opportunities, and transportation and by
being sensitive to the environmental impacts of development.
Page 8 of 30
i
Staff Report
Valley View Rezone and Subdivision
#RZ-2005-12 KIVA #RPP4-2053391
#SU-2005-16 KIVA #RPP3-2053388
Policy H-1.1: Ensure that community and human services, including, but not
limited to, fire, police, library facilities, medical services, neighborhood
shopping, child care, food banks, and recycling facilities are easily accessible to
neighborhood residents.
Planning Services Comment
The proposed rezone and subdivision are supported by relevant goals and
policies contained within the Housing Element of the Comprehensive Plan.
Appropriate services, including, but not limited to, fire, police, medical services
and neighborhood shopping are easily accessible to neighborhood residents
upon development of the subject property.
NATURAL RESOURCES GOALS AND POLICIES:
Goal LU-20: Protect and enhance environmentally sensitive areas via the
adoption of the City regulations and programs which encourage
well-designed land use patterns such as clustering and planned
unit development. Use such land use patterns to concentrate
higher urban land use densities and intensity of uses in specified
areas in order to preserve natural features such as large
wetlands, streams, steep slopes, and forests.
Goal LU-22: Ensure that the City's environmental policies and regulations
comply with state and federal environmental protection
regulations regarding air and water quality, noise and wildlife and
fisheries resources and habitat protection. Demonstrate support
for environmental quality in land use plans, development
regulations, and site plan review to ensure that local land use
management is consistent with the City's overall natural resource
goals.
Planning Services Comment:
I The proposed rezone and subdivision are supported by relevant goals and
policies contained within the Natural Resources Section of the Comprehensive
Plan. The steep slope areas located along the northern property line of the
1 subject site will be addressed through an approved grading plan that will
minimize potential runoff and potential for erosion and slope instability.
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT:
Goal TR-1: Coordinate land use and transportation planning to meet the
needs of the City and the requirements of the Growth
Management Act.
Page 9 of 30
i
Staff Report
Valley View Rezone and Subdivision
#RZ-2005-12 KIVA #RPP4-2053391
#SU-2005-16 KIVA #RPP3-2053388
Policy TR-1.2: Coordinate new commercial and residential development in Kent
with transportation projects to improve affected roadways.
Policy TR-1.5: Ensure consistency between land use and transportation plans '
so that land use and adjacent transportation facilities are
compatible.
Planning Services Comment:
The Growth Management Act requires consistency between land use and 1
transportation planning. As noted, the Land Use Plan identifies the area of the
rezone as SF-6 Single Family Residential. The Public Works Department has
identified improvements to the local transportation network necessary to
accommodate the proposed higher density. These improvements will be
required through the conditions of approval proposed for this subdivision.
B. Standards For Granting A Subdivision
The purpose of the City of Kent Subdivision Code is to provide rules,
regulations, requirements, standards and procedures for subdividing land in the
City of Kent, ensuring that the highest feasible quality in subdivisions will be
attained; that the public health, safety, general welfare, and aesthetics of the
City of Kent shall be promoted and protected; that orderly growth,
development, and the conservation, protection and proper use of land shall be
promoted; that proper provisions for all public facilities, including connectivity,
circulation, utilities, and services shall be made; that maximum advantage of
site characteristics shall be taken into consideration; and that the process shall
be in conformance with provisions set forth in the City of Kent Zoning Code and
Kent Comprehensive Plan (KCC 12.04.015).
The procedures regulating subdivisions are established to ensure quality
development which promotes orderly and efficient growth, the conservation and
proper use of land; protects the public health, safety, general welfare, and
aesthetics of the city; makes adequate provisions for public facilities in
conformance with provisions set forth in KCC Title 15, Zoning, and the Kent
Comprehensive Plan; and complies with the provisions of this chapter and
Chapter 58.17 RCW (KCC 12.04.600).
No subdivision shall be approved unless the following principles of acceptability
are met; the subdivision shall:
1. Create legal building sites which comply with all provisions of KCC Title
15, Zoning, and health regulations;
Page 10 of 30
i
jStaff Report
Valley View Rezone and Subdivision
#RZ-1105-12 KIVA #RPP4-2053391
#SU-2005-16 KIVA #RPP3-2053388
2. Establish access to a public road for each segregated parcel;
3. Have suitable physical characteristics; a proposed plat may be denied
because of flood, inundation or wetland conditions; slope, soil stability
and/or capabilities; or the construction of protective improvements may
be required as a condition of approval;
4. If adjacent to another municipality or King County, take into
consideration the subdivision standards of that jurisdiction as well as the
requirements of this chapter;
5. Make adequate provision for stormwater detention, dramageways, water
supplies, sanitary wastes, and other public utilities and services, as
i deemed necessary;
■ 6. Make adequate provision for the connectivity of streets, alleys, pedestrian
accessways and other public ways (KCC 12.04.635).
As evidenced by the General Information in Section I. and the following
responses to the criteria for approving subdivisions, the proposal is in general
conformance with the Kent Subdivision Code.
Furthermore, Section 12.04.685 of the Kent Subdivision Code indicates that a
subdivision shall not be approved unless the City finds that:
1. Appropriate provisions have been made for:
a. The public health, safety and general welfare of the community;
The proposed plat is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan
designation of SF-6 The proposed density and lot dimensions are
consistent with the respective zoning districts, as proposed
through this application.
b. Protection of environmentally sensitive lands and habitat;
A Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance (ENV-2005-58) for
this development proposal as well as for the proposed rezone
was issued on May 19, 2006, then revised on June 1, 2006.
Conditions of this determination require the applicant to provide
* mitigation for traffic impacts created by the proposed
j development.
Page 11 of 30
Staff Report
Valley View Rezone and Subdivision
#RZ-2005-12 KIVA #RPP4-2053391
#SU-2005-16 KIVA #RPP3-2053388
C. Open spaces;
Provisions for open space will be made through payment of a fee
in lieu of dedication of on-site open space as discussed in section
d. below.
d. Community parks and recreation;
The Parks Department has commented that the proposed
subdivision does impact existing park facilities. No open space is
shown on the site plan for this project. The owner/applicant
will be required to pay a fee in lieu of dedication of land pursuant
to Section 12.04,780. This fee is based on the value of the
subject land at the time of application for preliminary subdivision
approval. As this application was deemed complete in January of
2006, land values from that date have been used to determine
that a fee of approximately $33,750 will be required in lieu of
dedication of open-space within the proposed plat (based on the
values provided by the King County Department of Assessments).
Funds collected in lieu of an on site dedication of open space will
be used for improvement and/or acquisition of additional park
space at the Chestnut Ridge park, located about one-half mile
east of the proposed subdivision.
e. Neighborhood tot lots and play areas;
Provisions for these areas will be accomplished by the fee paid
under section d. above.
f. Schools and school grounds;
The subject property lies within the Kent School District.
Pursuant to KCC 12.13.160, a school impact fee (currently
assessed at $4,775 per single family residence) will be assessed
in association with the subdivision of land. The impact fee will be
assessed and collected for each individual lot at the time of
construction permit issuance and will be based upon the adopted
impact fee at that time.
9. Drainageways;
Each individual residence will be required to provide on-site
infiltration as well as an overflow connection to an approved
conveyance system.
Page 12 of 30
iStaff Report
Valley View Rezone and Subdivision
#RZ-2005-12 KIVA #RPP4-2053391
#SU-2005-16 KIVA #RPP3-2053388
In. Stormwater Detention;
The City of Kent Public Works Department has reviewed the
incremental increase in impervious area and determined the
proposed stormwater system to be adequate.
i. Connectivity of sidewalks, pedestrian pathways, traffic calming
features and devices, and other planning features that assure
safe walking conditions within and between subdivisions for
residents and students who walk to and from schools, parks,
transit stops and other neighborhood services;
Sidewalks will be required along both sides of the proposed
public streets, and along 92nd Avenue. The proposed road
configuration will allow connection of sidewalks to future
developments north and south of the site.
j. Connectivity of streets or roads, alleys, pedestrian accessways,
and other public ways within and between subdivisions and
neighborhoods;
Properties to the north of the Valley View site are currently under
City review for subdivision development, but have yet to receive
preliminary approval. A proposal for subdivision of the southern
adjacent properties is also expected in the near future. The
proposed north/south roadway for the Valley View subdivision
provides connection points at the north and south property so as
to allow the roadway to be part of an interconnected network
that will be created by the proposed development in this area.
By working closely with City staff and the applicants for the
northern adjacent project (Sophia Glenn #SU-2005-6), the
applicant has proposed a roadway design that will be part of a
larger network, and have access to existing public right of way
only through the northerly Sophia Glenn site. As the Sophia
Glenn preliminary plat is on a similar schedule as Valley View and
the two projects are both being designed by Barghausen
Consulting Engineers, the connection to 92nd Avenue South will
likely be in place prior to final approval of the Valley View
subdivision. However, in the event that the coordination effort
fails and the Valley View roadway is constructed before the
Sophia Glenn public roadway connection is available, appropriate
temporary easements across the Sophia Glenn site will need to
be in place to connect Valley View to 92nd Avenue South.
Page 13 of 30
I
Staff Report
Valley View Rezone and Subdivision
#RZ-2005-12 KIVA #RPP4-2053391
#SU-2005-16 KIVA #RPP3-2053388
k. Transit stops;
Transit service is available less than 1 mile from the site at East
Valley Highway and 208th Street
I. Potable water supplies;
All homes within the proposed plat will be connected to water
service provided by the Soos Creek Water and Sewer District.
M. Sanitary wastes;
All homes within the plat will be connected to sanitary
proposed sewer service provided by the Soos Creek Water and Sewer
District.
n. Other public utilities and services, as deemed necessary:
Power and natural gas lines will be installed during plat
construction. Garbage service will be established by the
individual residents.
2. The city has considered all other relevant facts; and determined
that the proposed plat will be in conformance with all of the
criteria listed above.
3. The public use and interest will be served by the platting of such
subdivision and dedication.
4. The City has considered the physical characteristics of the
proposed subdivision site and may deny a proposed plat because
of flood, inundation, or wetland conditions; slope, or sod stability
and/or capabilities. Construction of protective improvements
may be required as a condition of approval, and such
improvements shall be noted on the final plat
C. ZONING CODE
1. Feasibility of Development
If the proposed rezone from SR-4.5 to SR-6, Single Family Residential is
approved, development on all lots in the proposed subdivision will be
subject to Zoning Code requirements in the SR-6, Single Family
Residential zoning district. All proposed lots within the subdivision area
meet the minimum lot size and width requirements for the SR-6, Single
Page 14 of 30
Staff Report
Valley View Rezone and Subdivision
#RZ-2005-12 KIVA #RPP4-2053391
#SU-2005-16 KIVA #RPP3-2053388
Family Residential district. The existing house on lot 4 will remain and
meets the development standards of the SR-6 zone.
Numerous significant trees are located on the site. Zoning regulations
encourage the retention of significant trees where roads, utilities, and
site improvements are not proposed. Tree retention plans will be
required for the plat and development of each lot where trees are
ilocated (per KCC Section 15.08.240).
2. Criteria for Granting a Request for Rezone
The following standards and criteria (Kent Zoning Code, Section
15.09.050) are used by the Hearing Examiner and City Council to
evaluate a request for a rezone. Such an amendment shall only be
granted if the City Council determines that the request is consistent with
these standards and criteria.
a. The proposed rezone is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
Planning_Services Comment
The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Plan Map designates the subject
property as SF-6, Single Family Residential which allows up to six units
per acre. A rezone of the site from SR-4.5 Single Family Residential to
SR-6 Single Family Residential will allow residential development up to
6.05 units per acre, which is also allowed under the Comprehensive
Plan. As previously discussed, the proposed rezone is also consistent
with the applicable goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan.
b. The proposed rezone and subsequent development of the site
would be compatible with development in the vicinity.
jPlanning Services Comment
The proposed rezone and subsequent development of the site would be
compatible and integrate well with the existing development in the
vicinity. Future development on the subject site will be part of a
residential area defined on the north by 200th Street, on the south by
208th Street and on the west by the Valley Freeway. This area features
low to medium density residential development in located both in
subdivisions and on unplatted lots.
In February of 2006 the Kent City Council approved a rezone of the 22
acres immediately north of the subject site from SR-4.5 to SR-6 (ref.
Sophia Glenn/Brenna's Vista II #RZ-2005-1, Ord. 3787). The proposed
Page 15 of 30
Staff Report
Valley View Rezone and Subdivision
#RZ-2005-12 KIVA #RPP4-2053391
#SU-2005-16 KIVA #RPP3-2053388
SR-6 zoning designation allows for 6.05 units per acre, a medium density
designation. As previously noted, the City is currently processing
residential subdivision proposals on the northern parcels which, if
approved, will establish modern residential subdivisions comprised of
approximately 5,700 square foot to 8,000 square foot lots. ,
The Valley Freeway (SR-167) abuts the site along the western boundary.
C. The proposed rezone will not unduly burden the transportation
system In the vrcmity of the property w1th significant adverse
Impacts which cannot be mitigated.
Planning Services Comment
A rezone of this property to SR-6, Single Family Residential will not
generate additional trips onto the existing transportation system.
However, the subdivision development will add trips to the local street
system. Road and street frontage conditions are part of the conditions
of approval recommended by staff for the proposed subdivision. These
improvements include but are not limited to curb, gutter, sidewalks,
planting strips, street lighting, paving, necessary street improvements,
and public stormwater conveyance. The applicant will be required to
participate in other City transportation improvement projects by
providing an environmental mitigation fee for the impacts created by
future development.
d. Circumstances have changed substantially since the
establishment of the current zoning district to warrant the
proposed rezone.
Planning Services Comment
In 2004, as part of the Comprehensive Plan update, the Council
established the SF-6 Comprehensive Plan designation and SR-4.5 zoning
designation to the entire 48 acre area between 92"d Avenue and the
Valley Freeway, south of 2001h Street and north of 2081h Street.
In 2005 the City Council passed an updated Critical Area Ordinance. In
part, the new CAO allows home builders greater flexibility when locating
new buildings on hillside areas. In short, the former hillside
development regulations set static numerical limitations on new
development based on degree of slope, seismic stability, erosion and
slide slippage potential. The development limitations associated with the
former hillside development regulations would likely have applied to
areas of this site. The new CAO allows development limitations to be
Page 16 of 30
' Staff Report
Valley View Rezone and Subdivision
#RZ-2005-12 KIVA #RPP4-2053391
#SU-2005-16 KIVA #RPP3-2053388
set through a detailed geotechnical review process that includes site
specific analysis and allows modern structural solutions to be applied to
potentially hazardous areas. Given this new flexibility, development of
the subject the site is feasible.
Additionally, in early 2006 the City Council approved a rezone of the 22
acres north of the Valley View site from SR-4.5 to SR-6. The City is
currently reviewing subdivision development plans for this northern area.
Development of these adjacent sites will help facilitate creation of a
roadway and utility network that will benefit the subject site.
The applicant proposes this rezone to support development of the
subject site as envisioned by the Comprehensive Plan.
e. The proposed rezone will not adversely affect the health, safety
and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Kent.
! Planning Services Comment
The proposed rezone is consistent with the vision of the Comprehensive
Plan. Subsequent development on the site will have to meet applicable
codes and regulations, including mitigation of anticipated environmental
impacts. Therefore, the rezone proposal will not adversely affect the
health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Kent.
D. CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS
The proposed rezone and subdivision are consistent with the goals and policies
of the City of Kent Comprehensive Plan.
1. Type of Land Use Allowed
tThe development of single family home sites is a principally permitted
use on land zoned SR-4.5 and SR-6, Single Family Residential.
j2. Level of Development Allowed
The proposed subdivision of approximately 3.9 acres into 18 building
sites is consistent with the designated Comprehensive Plan designation
of SF-6 Single Family/6 units per acre and with the zoning designation of
ISR-6 (pending the outcome the proposed rezone).
Page 17 of 30
Staff Report
Valley View Rezone and Subdivision
#RZ-2005-12 KIVA #RPP4-2053391
#SU-2005-16 KIVA #RPP3-2053388
3. Adequacy of Infrastructure
The proposed subdivision will place increased demands on existing
transportation, water and sanitary sewer systems in the general vicinity.
The project will also result in a significant net increase of impervious
surface area on the two parcels involved. When fully developed, the
impact of 17 new homes being occupied will result in an estimated 170
daily and 17 new PM peak hour trips to the local street system.
The effects on the domestic water supply, sanitary sewer service,
stormwater run-off, conveyance, storage, treatment and discharge and
transportation impacts have been analyzed through the subdivision
review as well as the SEPA process and associated MDNS.
4. Characteristics of the Proposed Subdivision
The proposed subdivision, as presented, appears to be in general
conformance with the Kent City Code with respect to the required
minimum lot area, minimum lot width and access to a public right of
way.
E. PROPOSED FINDINGS
Planning Services has reviewed these applications in relation to the
Comprehensive Plan, zoning, land use, street system, flood control problems
and comments from other departments and finds that:
1. The Kent Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designates this site SF-6,
Single Family Residential, 6 units per acre maximum density.
2. The site is currently zoned SR-4.5 Single Family Residential. If RZ-
2005-12 is approved, this site will be zoned SR-6, Single Family
Residential and subject to the development standards which include
5,700 square foot minimum lot size and 50 foot minimum lot width.
3. Current land uses in the immediate area are predominantly low and ,.
medium density single family residential.
4. A Tentative Plat meeting was held for the proposed subdivision on
August 11, 2005 (#TSU-2005-16).
5. A Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance was issued for the plat on i
May 19, 2006, and revised June 1, 2006 (#ENV-2005-58).
Page 18 of 30
Staff Report
Valley View Rezone and Subdivision
4RZ-2105-11 KIVA #RPP4-2053391
#SU-2005-16 KIVA #RPP3-2053388
6. There are significant trees of six inch or greater caliper located on the
property.
7. The site has access to 92nd Avenue South.
8. The subject property would receive water service from the Soos Creek
Water and Sewer District.
9. The subject property would receive sewer service from the Soos Creek
Water and Sewer District.
V. CITY STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
1. ZONING MAP AMENDMENT (#RZ-2005-12)
Upon review of the merits of this request and the Code criteria for granting a
rezone, the City staff recommends APPROVAL without conditions of the Valley
View rezone.
2. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION (#SU-2005-16)
Based on the merits of this request and the code criteria for granting a
preliminary subdivision, staff recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Valley
View preliminary plat subject to the following conditions
A. PRIOR TO RECORDING THE PLAT FOR THIS SUBDIVISION:
1. The Owner / Subdivider shall pay all Charges in Lieu of
Assessments and/or Latecomer Fees, if any, prior to scheduling
the Pre-Construction Conference and/or prior to recording this
plat, whichever comes first.
2. The Owner / Subdivider shall provide Public Works with a digital
plat map prepared with a CAD program. The digital information
can be formatted in either *.DWG (AutoCad) or *.DXF (Drawing
Exchange File), but must be based upon State Plane
coordinates: an assumed coordinate system is not
permitted. The State Plane Coordinates shall be on the NAD
83/91 datum and must relate to at least two City of Kent
reference points within one half mile of the subdivision. In
addition, the project shall be tied into at least two City of Kent
NAD 88 vertical benchmarks and two additional permanent
benchmarks shall be established within the project. The
locations, descriptions and elevations of these benchmarks will be
Page 19 of 30
Staff Report
Valley View Rezone and Subdivision
#RZ-2005-12 KIVA #RPP4-2053391
#SU-2005-16 KIVA #RPP3-2053388
reported at the time as-built drawings are submitted along with
field notes sufficient to verify the required precision.
3. The Owner / Subdivider shall submit and receive City approval
for engineering drawings from the Department of Public Works,
and shall then either construct or bond for the following:
a. A public gravity sanitary sewer system to serve all lots. r
This development will be served by the Soos Creek Water •
& Sewer District and will be constructed to Soos Creek
Water & Sewer District standards and specifications.
The septic system serving the existing home(s) within the
proposed subdivision - if any - shall be abandoned in
accordance with King County Health Department
Regulations.
b. A public water system meeting domestic and fire flow
requirements for all lots.
This development will be served by Soos Creek Water &
Sewer District and will be constructed to Soos Creek
Water & Sewer District standards and specifications.
Existing wells — if any - shall be abandoned in accordance
with the requirements of the Department of Ecology.
C. A stormwater system. The Engineering Plans must meet
the minimum requirements of the City of Kent
Construction Standards and 2002 City of Kent Surface
Water Design Manual (KSWDM). Initial guidance for the
Engineering Plans is given below (See Chapter 2 of
KSWDM for detailed submittal requirements):
(1) The Engineering Plans will include at a minimum:
Site improvement plans which include all plans,
details, notes and specifications necessary to
construct road, drainage, and other related
improvements. The engineering plans shall include
a technical information report (TIR) which
contains all the technical information and analysis
to develop the site improvement plans.
Page 20 of 30
rStaff Report
Valley View Rezone and Subdivision
#RZ-2005-12 KIVA #RPP4-2053391
#SU-2005-16 KIVA #RPP3-2053388
(2) An erosion and sedimentation control (ESC) plan
shall be included with the engineering plans. The
ESC shall meet the requirements of the City of
Kent Construction Standards, and the 2002 City of
Kent Surface Water Design Manual. These plans
must reflect the Detailed Grading Plan discussed
below, and the Planning Department approved
Detailed Tree Plan
(3) The retention / detention and release standard
that will be met by the subdivision is Level Two.
The water quality menu that will be met by the
subdivision is the Resource Stream Protection
Menu. A letter of approval from WA DOT is
required for the outlet of the stormwater
facility to enter WA DOT right of way.
(4) The site improvement plans and technical
information report will contain drainage
' calculations and a drawing of the retention /
detention pond tract at an appropriate engineering
scale to show that the proposed on-site or off-site
retention / detention tract is large enough to
contain the required minimum stormwater storage
volume and water quality facility. The site
improvement plans will also show that all required
stormwater management facilities will be outside
of delineated wetlands and their buffers, as well
1 as outside of creeks and rivers and their buffers.
(5) A downstream analysis is required for this
I development, and it will include an analysis for
capacity, erosion potential, and water quality.
Refer to the requirements of Technical
Information Reports in Section 3: "Offsite
Analysis", of the 2002 City of Kent Surface Water
Design Manual for the specific information
required for downstream analyses.
(6) Roof downspouts for each roofed structure
(house, garage, carport, etc.) shall be directed to
a Roof Downspout Infiltration System meeting the
requirements of Section C.2, flow Control BMP's, in
1 Appendix C to the King County Surface Water
Design Manual. These roof downspout conveyance
Page 21 of 30
Staff Report
Valley View Rezone and Subdivision
#RZ-2005-12 KIVA #RPP4-2053391
#SU-2005-16 KIVA #RPP3-2053388
and infiltration systems shall include overflow
pipes connected to an approved dispersion
system. The Drainage Plans will include an
approved detail for the Roof Downspout
Infiltration System. The face of the recorded plat
shall contain the following restriction:
AS A CONDITION OF BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE,
RESIDENCES CONSTRUCTED ON LOTS OF THIS
SUBDIVISION MUST PROVIDE ROOF DOWNSPOUT
INFILTRATION SYSTEMS PER DETAILS SHOWN ON
THE APPROVED PLANS.
(7) If determined necessary by the Public Works
Department following review and approval of the
required downstream analysis, the Owner /
Subdivider shall provide public drainage
easements meeting the requirements of the City
of Kent Construction Standards for the specified
downstream reach where adequate public
drainage easements do not currently exist.
(8) The Owner / Subdivider shall submit Landscape
Plans for within and surrounding the retention /
detention facility to the Planning Department and
to the Department of Public Works for concurrent
review and approval prior to, or in conjunction
with, the approval of the Engineering Plans. These
Landscape Plans shall meet the minimum
requirements of the City of Kent Construction
Standards, and the stormwater management
landscaping requirements contained within the ,
1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual.
Landscape Plans are required to show adjacent
Street Trees so that the City arbcnst can assess
potential adverse stress upon all types of
vegetation.
(9) The Owner / Subdivider shall execute Declaration ,
of Stormwater Facility Maintenance Covenants for
the private portions of the drainage system
prepared by the Property Management Section of
the Department of Public Works. See Reference 8-
F, Declaration of Stormwater Facility Maintenance
Covenant, to the 2002 City of Kent Surface Water
Page 22 of 30
iStaff Report
Valley View Rezone and Subdivision
#RZ-2005-12 KIVA #RPP4-2053391
#SU-2005-16 KIVA #RPP3-2053388
Design Manual for information on what is
contained within this document.
d. A Detailed Grading Plan for the entire subdivision meeting
the requirements of the City of Kent Construction
Standards, and Gty of Kent Development Assistance
Brochure #1-3, Excavation and Grading Permits &
Grading Plans. Initial guidance for these plans is given
below:
(1) These plans will include provisions for utilities,
roadways, retention / detention ponds,
stormwater treatment facilities, and a building
Ifootpad for each lot.
(2) These plans shall be designed to eliminate the
need for processing several individual Grading
Permits upon application for Budding Permits:
phasing of grading on a lot-by-lot basis will not be
considered.
(3) These plans will use a 2-foot maximum contour
interval, and every fifth contour line will be darker
in conformance to standard drafting practice.
(4) These plans will clearly demonstrate that the City`s
maximum street grades of 12 percent will not be
exceeded unless otherwise approved by the Fire
I and Public Works Departments and that adequate
stopping sight distance is available for all
driveways and street intersections.
je. Interim Street Improvement Plans for 92nd Avenue South
along the entire property frontage thereon. These Interim
Street Improvement Plans shall meet the requirements of
the City of Kent Construction Standards, and City of Kent
Development Assistance Brochures #6-2, Private and
Public Street Improvements, and # 6-8, Street
Improvement Plans, for a street designated as a
Residential Collector Arterial Street with Bike Lanes within
the City of Kent Comprehensive Plan. Initial guidance for
the necessary interim street improvements is given
below:
1
Page 23 of 30
Staff Report
Valley View Rezone and Subdivision
#RZ-2005-12 KIVA #RPP4-2053391
#SU-2005-16 KIVA #RPP3-2053388
(1) Combined vertical concrete curbs & gutters, a 5-
foot wide planter strip, and a 5-foot cement
concrete sidewalk along the west side of the
street.
(2) A minimum of 22-feet of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA)
pavement as measured from the approved
centerline of the street to the face of curb on the
west side of the street, plus at least 12-feet of
HMA pavement as measured from the approved
centerline to the edge of the traveled lane on the
east side of the street.
A City approved shoulder on the east side of the
street.
(3) A City-approved street lighting system.
(4) Public stormwater conveyance, detention and
treatment facilities as applicable.
(5) Street Trees installed within the 5-foot wide
planting strips constructed between the back of
curb and the front of the cement concrete
sidewalk. These Street Trees will be located as
approved by the Public Works Department, and
the species shall be selected from the Approved
Street Tree List contained within City of Kent
Development Assistance Brochure #14, City of
Kent Street Trees.
f. Street Improvement Plans for Road B, the new public
Residential Street running parallel to 92"d Avenue South
and terminating with a temporary cul-de-sac bulb, or
approved turnaround at its southerly terminus. The Street
Improvement Plans for this street shall be designed in
conformance to the requirements for a Residential Street
as required by City of Kent Construction Standards, and
City of Kent Development Assistance Brochure #6-2,
PrIvate and Public Street Improvements and Gty of Kent
Development Assistance Brochure # 6-8, Street
Improvement Plans for a public street 28-feet wide. Initial
guidance for these street improvements is given below:
Page 24 of 30
1 i
' Staff Report
Valley View Rezone and Subdivision
4RZ-2111-12 KIVA #RPP4-2011111
#SU-2005-16 KIVA #RPP3-2053388
(1) Combined vertical curb & gutter, a 5-foot wide
planting strip constructed between the back of
curb and the front of the sidewalk, and then a 5-
foot wide cement concrete sidewalk along both
sides of the street.
(2) A minimum of 28-feet of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA)
pavement, as measured from face of vertical curb
to face of vertical curb which will provide for
parking on one side only.
I (3) A street lighting system designed to the City's
standards, constructed and maintained by the
IntoLight Division of Puget Sound Energy; all
electrical and maintenance bills shall be paid for
by the Home Owner's Association created for this
1 subdivision.
i
(4) A public stormwater drainage system, including
provisions for collection, conveyance, detention,
and treatment facilities.
(5) Curb return radii of 20-feet at the intersection
Road A and Road B.
(6) Street grades shall be no steeper than 12 percent
without the Fire Marshal's and the Public Works
Department approval, and must provide the
minimum stopping sight distance on grades
meeting the criteria found in the 2004 edition of
the AASHTO Green Book, as modified by the
WSDOT.
(7) Street Trees installed within the 5-foot wide
I planting strips. These Street Trees will be located
as approved by the Public Works Department, and
the species shall be selected from the Approved
Street Tree List contained within City of Kent
Development AssIstance Brochure #14, City of
Kent Street Trees
' (8) Because Road B does not connect directly to
92'd Avenue Southeas4 the Owner / :-I
Subdivider should pursue an agreement ?
with the Owners of the abutting pending
Page 25 of 30
Staff Report
Valley View Rezone and Subdivision
#RZ-2005-12 KIVA #RPP4-2053391
#SU-2005-16 KIVA #RPP3-2053388
subdivision, Sophia Glenn, SU 2005-06,
which will ensure construction of an off-site
interim street improvement that does
connect to 92nd Avenue Southeast. No
Building Permits for any lot will be issued
until the off-site fire access roadway is
constructed, and fire hydrants have been
installed,
g. Street Improvement Plans for Road A, the new public
Residential Street connected to Road B and terminating
with permanent cul-de-sac bulb at its easterly terminus.
The Street Improvement Plans for this street shall be
designed in conformance to the requirements for a
Residential Street as required by City of Kent Construction
Standards, and City of Kent Development Assistance
Brochure #6-2, Private and Public Street Improvements
and City of Kent Development Assistance Brochure # 6-8,
Street Improvement Plans for a public at least street 28-
feet wide. Initial guidance for these street improvements
is given below:
(1) Combined vertical curb & gutter, a 5-foot wide
planting strip constructed between the back of
curb and the front of the sidewalk, and then a 5-
foot wide cement concrete sidewalk along both
sides of the street.
(2) A minimum of 28-feet of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA)
pavement, as measured from face of vertical curb
to face of vertical curb which will provide for
parking on one side only.
(3) A street fighting system designed to the City's
standards, constructed and maintained by the
IntoLight Division of Puget Sound Energy; all
electrical and maintenance bills shall be paid for
by the Home Owner's Association created for this
subdivision.
(4) A public stormwater drainage system, including
provisions for collection, conveyance, detention,
and treatment facilities.
Page 26 of 30
t
Staff Report
Valley View Rezone and Subdivision
4RZ-2005-11 KIVA #RPP4-1011391
#SU-2005-16 KIVA #RPP3-2053388
(5) Curb return radii of 20-feet at the intersection of
Road A and Road B, and 45-foot radii to the edge
of pavement for the temporary cul-de-sac bulbs.
' (6) Street grades shall be no steeper than 12 percent
without the Fire Marshall's and the Public Works
Department approval, and must provide the
minimum SSD on grades meeting the criteria
found in the 2004 edition of the AASHTO Green
Book - as modified by WSDOT.
(7) Street Trees installed within the 5-foot wide
planting strips. These Street Trees will be located
as approved by the Public Works Department, and
the species shall be selected from the Approved
Street Tree List contained within Oty of Kent
Development Assistance Brochure #14, City of
Kent Street Trees.
h. Street Improvement Plans for the new Private Residential
Streets connected to Road B, and terminating with
permanent cul-de-sac bulbs, or approved turnaround at
their termini. The Street Improvement Plans for these
streets shall be designed in conformance to the
requirements for a Private Residential Street as required
by City of Kent Construction Standards, and Oty of Kent
Development Assistance Brochure #6-2, Private and
Public Street Improvements and City of Kent
1 Development Assistance Brochure # 6-8, Street
Improvement Plans for a private street at least 20-feet
wide. Initial guidance for these street improvements is
Igiven below:
(1) A minimum of 20-feet of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA)
pavement, measured from edge of pavement to
edge of pavement, or from face of vertical curb to
face of vertical curb, except where the Fire
I Marshal requires additional pavement width for
emergency vehicle access.
I (2) A 5-foot wide paved walkway along one side of
each private street.
I (3) An approved cul-de-sac bulb, or turnaround at its
terminus, unless these additional street
Page 27 of 30
Staff Report
Valley View Rezone and Subdivision
#RZ-2005-12 KIVA #RPP4-2053391
#SU-2005-16 KIVA #RPP3-2053388
improvements are not required by the City Fire
Marshal.
(4) A private stormwater drainage system, including
provisions for conveyance, detention, and
treatment facilities where applicable.
(5) The minimum inside radius the 90 degree bend in
the westerly private street will be 30-feet, the
minimum outside edge of the pavement radius of
the 90 degree bend will be 55-feet.
(6) The maximum grade of these private streets will
be 12 percent without the Fire Marshall's and the
Public Works Department approval, and the profile
for these private streets must also comply with the
vertical curve criteria for Public Residential Streets.
(7) The private street, including sidewalk must be
centered within a private roadway tract or '
easement that is at least 1-foot wider than the
total width of the private street and sidewalk
combination.
(8) All private streets must meet the minimum
horizontal and vertical alignment criteria required
for a public residential street to ensure safe
stopping sight distances, and all private streets
will have a minimum design radii of 30-feet unless
otherwise approved by the Department of Public
Works.
i. Street Light Plans for 92"d Avenue South and all internal
Residential Streets meeting the requirements of the Cites
of Kent Construction Standards, and City of Kent
Development Assistance Brochure #6-1, Street Lighting
Requirements
4. The Owner / Subdivider shall create a Homeowner's Association
for this subdivision to ensure that the property owners within this
subdivision are advised of their requirement to pay for the
provided street lighting system. Those sections of the required
document written to govern that association as they relate to any
IntoLight Division of Puget Sound Energy street lighting systems,
Page 28 of 30
Staff Report
Valley View Rezone and Subdivision
1 #RZ-2005-12 KIVA #RPP4-2053391
#SU-2005-16 KIVA #RPP3-2053388
shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public
Works, prior to the recording these documents.
5. The face of the final plat will clearly identify all private streets,
and which lots will be served by those private streets. The face of
the final plat will also specify that the maintenance of all private
streets is the sole responsibility of the property owners who are
served by those private streets.
6. Direct vehicular access to and from lots having frontage along
I 92nd Avenue South is prohibited, and the face of the final plat will
carry the following restriction:
DIRECT VEHICULAR ACCESS TO AND FROM LOTS HAVING
FRONTAGE ALONG 92ND AVENUE SOUTH IS PROHIBITED.
7. The Owner / Subdivider shall deed all public rights-of-way, and
otherwise convey all private and public easements necessary for
the construction and maintenance of the required improvements
for this subdivision development.
8. The Owner / Subdivider shall submit and receive approval of a
Detailed Tree Plan, meeting the requirements of the Kent Zoning
Code, and City of Kent Development Assistance Brochure #3,
Detailed Tree Plans, prior to the issuance of any Construction
Permits for the subdivision. Grading Plans cannot be approved by
the Department of Public Works without an approved Detailed
Tree Plan. Detailed Tree Plans are not to be confused with
required Street Tree Plans, which have an entirely different
purpose.
9. Prior to release of any construction bonds, and prior to the
approval of any Building Permits within the subject subdivision,
the Department of Public Works must receive and approve As-
Built Drawings meeting the requirements of the City of Kent
Construction Standards, and City of Kent Development Assistance
Brochure #E--1, As-Build Drawings, for: Streets; Street Lighting
' System; Water; Sewer; Stormwater Drainage Facilities; and all
off-site improvements where the locations and/or elevations are
deemed critical by the Department of Public Works.
' B. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT ON ANY LOT IN
THIS SUBDIVISION, THE OWNER / SUBDIVIDER SHALL:
' 1. Record the Plat.
Page 29 of 30
Staff Report
Valley View Rezone and Subdivision
#RZ-2005-12 KIVA #RPP4-2053391
#SU-2005-16 KIVA #RPP3-2053388
2. Construct all of the improvements required in Section A, above,
and/or pay the respective fees-in-lieu-of including any mitigation
(EMA or EMF) charges.
3. Receive approval of the required As-Built Drawings for Street,
Street Lighting, Water, Sewer, and Stormwater Management
Facilities as deemed appropriate by the Department of Public
Works.
KENT PLANNING SERVICES
June 14, 2006
MG•ch•S.\Permit\Plan\rezone\2005\2053391-2005-12staffrpt doc ,
Page 30 of 30
I -TiW2
Si00TH ST
ST St ST
1
a co'
' 'S 208TH
`�'"� ..yy,,,���-•,�([�� �` ;�-?;SST � .. �.ri}' t
.Q 'S 210TN ',—
._ , .
fir low
Isersra_ too
CT
weSNOn ss. k 12 r a s 2 '
ro I
Ur f Ar I ,wtel,r/SFl10R
e R. taY
oil , A 3
ir 'Ta 1
,n•
nw
IL i-i i 14 M 8 '? r- --- 70 V1 i
I4 fit , x � fir � i X
I ® tr ACCM #Ast 8 M
uSEMor umar 5 ?
t,r , fir
n 7 +� 6 ar i ow
flt fir 135 t
APPLICATION NAME:VALLEY VIEW
REQUEST: REZONE#RZ-2005-12 AND PRELIMINARY PLAT#SU-2005-15
VICINITY AND SITE MAP
I
t
WAsiiirvcron REVISED
CITY OF KENT
MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE
Environmental Checklist No. #ENV-2005-58 Project VALLEY VIEW SUBDIVISION
#RPSA-2053392 AND REZONE
Description The applicant proposes to rezone and then subdivide two existing residential parcels totaling
approximately 3.9 acres into 18 single family lots. The rezone proposal would change the
current zoning of SR-4 5 Single Family Residential to SR-6, Single Family Residential The
City`s Comprehensive Plan Map designates the site SF-6, Single Family.
Primary access to the site is proposed via a new pubic road connected to 92nd Avenue South.
Roadway connections will also be provided to properties located north and south of the
subject site Per current City ordinances, no regulated environmentally sensitive areas are
located on the subject site.
Location The property is located at 20433 and 2054192nd Avenue S. and the parcels are identified by
' APN 062205-9036 and APN 062205-9056.
Applicant Omid Pazooki
5624 117th Avenue SE
Bellevue, WA 98006
Lead Agency CITY OF KENT
jThe lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact
on the environment. An environmental impact statement(EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c).
This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with
the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request.
There is no comment period for this DNS.
' X This MDNS is issued under 197-11-340(2). The lead agency will not act on this proposal for
28 days from the date of this decision, this includes a 14-day comment period followed by a
14-day appeal period as provided by WAC 197 11 680 Comments must be submitted by
June 2, 2006.
Responsible Official Kim Marousek, AICP
Position/Title Principal Planner / SEPA OFFICIAL
Address 220 S. Fourth Avenue, Kent, WA 98032 Telephone: (253) 856-5454
Dated ,-,Q.-�,o Signature
' June 2, 2006
APPEAL PROCESS. AN APPEAL OF A DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) MUST BE MADE TO
THE KENT HEARING EXAMINER WITHIN FOURTEEN (14) FOLLOWING THE END OF THE INITIAL COMMENT
PERIOD PER KENT CITY CODE 11.03.520.
Mitigated DNS
Valley View Subdivision and Rezone
#ENV-2005-58 (RPSA-2053392)
CONDITIONS/MITIGATING MEASURES:
1. The Applicant shall provide a Traffic Impact Study(TIS) to identify the existing and future level-of-
service(LOS)for the adjacent intersections identified in the Staff Report for this development and the
existing and future V/ C ratios for the adjacent City streets in the roadway network. The TIS shall
specifically identify all intersections and streets currently at or below City standards, or estimated to
be at or below City standards due to the increased traffic volumes reasonably expected from the
development; and all adjacent streets at or above the V / C ratios established for that Mobility
Management Zone.
The TIS shall then identify what improvements are necessary to provide a LOS better than or equal
to City standards for all intersections to completely mitigate the existing and/or development impacts
thereon The TIS shall also identify what improvements are necessary to completely mitigate the
adjacent streets which do not meet the V/ C requirements of Chapter 12.11 of the Kent City Code.
Upon agreement by the City with the findings of the TIS and of the mitigation measures
recommended in the approved TIS, implementation and/or construction of said mitigation measures
shall be the conditional requirement of the issuance of the respective development permits.
OR
In lieu of submitting the TIS required above and then providing the mitigation measures identified in
the approved study, the Owner / Subdivider may instead execute an Environmental Mitigation
Agreement (EMA) to participate in, and pay a fair share of the estimated construction costs of the
City's South 200th Street/ South 196th Street / South 192nd Street Corridor Project. The minimum
benefit to the Owner/Subdivider is estimated at$16,146(1986 dollars as adjusted for rezones, but
to be adjusted for inflation based upon the Consumer Price Index, United States City Average for all
Urban Consumers, or the substituted index as prepared by the United States Department of Labor)
based upon 16 new PM Peak Hour Trips(at the half-rate of$897 per PM Peak Hour Trip), and 1 new
PM Peak Hour Trips (at the full-rate of$1794 per PM Peak Hour Trip)and the capacity of the South
200th Street/ South 1961h Street/ South 192nd Street Corridor.
The payment of the traffic mitigation fees shall be made on an incremental basis prior to the issuance
of a building or development permit on each lot within the subject subdivision. If the Owner /
Subdivider creates a Homeowners Association and provides for a sinking fund to pay for the identified
financial obligation (subject to City approval of the form of the sinking fund financial obligation),then
the Owner/Subdivider may execute an Environmental Mitigation Agreement(EMA)to participate in,
and pay a fair share of the estimated construction costs of the City's South 200th Street/South 196m
Street/ South 192A Street Corridor Project.
a. The final benefit value will be determined based upon the number of lots approved upon the
final plat (minus one for the existing home) multiplied times $949 76 (in 1986 dollars as
adjusted for rezones; but not yet adjusted for inflation as described above).
b. The execution of this EMA, and the conditions given within this document, will serve to
mitigate traffic impacts to the above mentioned intersections and road system by committing
funding for the South 200th Street/ South 196th Street/ South 192nd Street Corridor which
will provide additional capacity for traffic volumes within the area of the above mentioned
development.
DepaFtfnent of Publie WeFks The Applieant shall then eenstFuet these fflpFE)YeFReAtS. These plefts
shall PF6Y de f8F a 6 feet w de veirt eally sepaFated asphalt walkway EeflfeFFn fig te StaHdaFd Deta 16-
2of3
Mitigated DNS
Valley View Subdivision and Rezone
#ENV-2005-58 (RPSA-2053392)
the sell d'seicetien of the Depaiatffient ef Publie 1A/eick.-r the Applk - nt fflay .-4.-ad pay a ai
Fund (fund #R29936.)
S:\Permit\Plan\Env\2005\2053392-2005-58mdns doc
1
3of3
REPORTS FROM STANDING COMMITTEES AND STAFF
A. COUNCIL PRESIDENT
' B. MAYOR
C. PARKS AND HUMAN SERVICES OMMITTEE
' D. PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
' E. OPERATIONS COMMITTEE
F. PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE
' G. PUBLIC WORKS
H. ADMINISTRATION
REPORTS FROM SPECIAL COMMITTEES
KENT
' WASHINOTON
OPERATIONS COMMITTEE MINUTES
TUNE 20, 2006
' Committee Members Present: Tim Clark, Chair, and Ron Harmon
The meeting was called to order by Tim Clark, Chair at 4:10 p.m.
AGENDA ITEMS 4 AND 5 WERE REMOVED FROM THE AGENDA.
' 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES DATED JUNE 6, 2006
Ron Harmon moved to approve the minutes of the June 6, 2006, Operation Committee
' meeting. Tim Clark seconded the motion, which passed 3-0, with Committee member
Debbie Raplee's concurrence.
2. APPROVAL OF VOUCHERS DATED JUNE 15, 2006
' Finance Director Robert Nachlinger presented the vouchers for June 15, 2006, for approval.
Ron Harmon moved to approve the vouchers dated June 15, 2006. Tim Clark seconded
' the motion, which passed 3-0 with Committee member Debbie Raplee's concurrence.
3. PBX TELEPHONE SYSTEM MAINTENANCE CONTRACT
Information Technology Technical Services Manager Paul Dunn presented the PBX Telephone System
Maintenance Contract. Mr. Dunn advised that since 2001, the City has contracted with the current
provider for maintenance services to the City's Nortel telephone switching equipment. The
maintenance contract has been renewed annually every July. For the last year, the level of service
J received under this contract has been unacceptable. There has been one maJor incident where
critical spare parts were not available. There are cases where the City's current provider has failed to
complete required preventive maintenance or required maintenance logs. In April 2006, the
Information Technology Technical Services Division issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) for
Telephone System Maintenance. Six Vendors responded, and following our evaluations and reference
checks, Verizon Business was chosen. Mr. Dunn advised that the cost of this contract is within $500
of the budgeted funds for the present vendor contract and that the funds are already budgeted for
telephone system maintenance.
' Ron Harmon moved to recommend approval of the Information Technology Department
to enter contract negotiations with Verizon Business to provide Telephone System
Maintenance Services for an annual price not to exceed $52,000, and for the Mayor to
approve said contract after it has been approved by the City Attorney's Office. Tim Clark
seconded the motion, which passed 3-0 with Committee member Debbie Raplee's
concurrence.
Operations Committee Minutes
June 20, 2006
Page: 2
For Informational Purposes On/y '
1ST QUARTER 2006 FINANCIAL REPORT
Assistant Finance Director Cliff Craig presented the Is' Quarter 2006 Financial Report. Questions
were asked by the Committee concerning LEOFF 1 members health insurance costs.
The meeting was adjourned at 4:25 p.m.
Renee Cameron
Operations Committee Secretary
2
Parks and Human Services Committee
' Meeting Minutes
May 25, 2006
Council members present: Debbie Raplee, Ron Harmon, Ron Harmon
Absent: Chair Debbie Ranniger concurred on all actions by telephone
The Kent City Council Parks and Human Services Committee meeting was called to order by
Debbie Raplee at 4:03 p.m.
' 1. Meeting Minutes of April 20, 2006 - Accept
Bob O'Brien moved to accept the meeting minutes of April 20, 2006. Ron Harmon
seconded and the motion passed 3-0.
2. Riverview Overpass Art Proposal - Authorize
Brenda Abney, Visual Arts Coordinator reported that in December 2005, City Council
approved the Five Year City Art Plan, which included the Riverview Overpass Project.
The project is for transportation-themed art designed for the overpass bridge over
the Green River, which runs east/west between 228th Street and Military Road. Artist
' Carolyn Law was chosen to complete the art proposal for $55,000.00 by jury. A
model of the overpass art railing for bridge was displayed at the meeting.
' Ron Harmon moved to recommend the Council authorize contracting with
Carolyn Law for the Riverview Overpass Art Proposal in the amount of
$55,000.00, and approve the expenditure of funds in the City Art Plan
budget. Bob O'Brien seconded and the motion passed 3-0.
3. Lease Agreement with Nextel for Wireless Communications Equipment at West
Fenwick - Authorize
Lori Flemm, Superintendent of Parks and Open Space explained that Nextel West
Corporation is requesting authorization to install wireless communications equipment,
plus a nonexclusive access easement at West Fenwick Park (See Exhibits A and B). As
part of the lease agreement, Nextel West Corporation will pay the City of Kent $1,300.00
per month. The revenue will fund replacement of light pole supplies and equipment
Bob O'Brien moved to recommend Council authorize the Mayor to enter into a
lease agreement with Nextel West Corporation to install wireless
communications equipment at West Fenwick Park, to accept the monthly fee of
$1,300.00, and approve the expenditure of funds in the Light Pole Replacement
budget. Ron Harmon second and the motion passed 3-0.
4. Donation from the Morford Family for Eagle Scout Plaques - Accept and Amend
Budget
Lori Flemm reported that the Parks Adopt-A-Park Program works with local Boy
Scouts to offer projects in parks, trails and open spaces that are suitable for Eagle
Scout advancement Upon completion of the projects, the city recognizes each Scout
' with a plaque at the project site. As part of the city's acknowledgment of appreciation
to the Scouts, they are also identified on the City's web page and in the Parks
Program Guide. Carol & Paul Morford, are parents of Eagle Scouts and have
Parks and Human Services Committee Meeting Minutes
May 25, 2006-Page t
Minutes of May 25, 2006 1
Page 2
generously supported this recognition project by donating funds for the purchase of
the brass engraved plaques.
Ron Harmon moved to recommend Council accept the donation of$1,500.00 I
from the Morford family to fund Eagle Scout recognition plaques, and
approve the expenditure of funds in the Eagle Scouts project budget. Bob
O'Brien seconded and the motion passed 3-0.
5. Donation from Ouota International for Service Club Ballfields - Accept and Amend
Budget '
Lon Flemm informed the committee that Quota International voted to match the
$37,000.00 pledges from local service clubs in support of the Service Club Ballfield
project at the Parks Committee meeting on 3uly 15, 2004. Quota International is a '
women's based service club that has supported services to children in the Kent area
for over 13 years. This is the second installment of their original pledge.
Bob O'Brien moved to recommend Council accept the donation of $5,000.00
from Quota International of Kent Valley in support of the Service Club Park
development, and authorize the expenditure of funds in the Service Club Ball
fields budget. Ron Harmon seconded and the motion passed 3-0.
6. Donation from Soroptimist for Service Club Ballfields - Accept and Amend Budget
Lori Flemm explained that the $7,750.00 from Soroptimist International of Kent is
the final payment from their original pledge of $35,000.00 to support the
construction of Service Club Park. To recognize the contributions from the
participating service clubs, play fields and the play area will be named for each club.
The park is currently under construction.
Ron Harmon moved to recommend Council accept the $7,750.00 donation
from Soroptimist International of Kent, and authorize the expenditure of
funds in the Service Club Park budget. Bob O'Brien seconded and the motion
passed 3-0.
7. Donation from the American Legion for Mill Creek Park - Accept and Amend Budget
Lon Flemm reported that to order to secure the access road to Mill Creek Park from
Canyon Drive, the American Legion Post 15 has requested the city install a fence and
gate to keep park and trail users from using their property to enter the park. The
Legion has provided a donation to off-set the cost of materials.
Bob O'Brien moved to recommend Council accept the donation of $300.00
from the American Legion Post 15 to fund the installation of a gate and
fence at Mill Creek, and approve the expenditure of funds in the Life Cycle
project budget. Ron Harmon seconded and the motion passed 3-0.
8. Interagency Committee for Outdoor Recreation Grant Application Resolutions -
Authorize
Lori Flemm explained that each year staff pursues funding for park development
through the Interagency for Outdoor Recreation (IAC). In order to meet IAC
application requirements, staff is required to get authorization from Council in order
to submit grant applications. The requested grants are through the Wildlife and
Parks and Human Seances Committee Meeting Minutes
May 25,2006-Page 2
Minutes of May 25, 2006
Page 3
Recreation Program for future neighborhood park development of the following
parks: 132 Avenue Park, Eagle Creek Neighborhood Park, Riverview Community Park
and West Hill Neighborhood Park. Master Plans for each park have been developed
Lori explained that in order to gain input from local neighborhoods before master
planning, staff hold numerous public meetings, Lon also stated that additional public
' meetings are held to get input from neighborhoods kids to pick out the play
equipment. Ron Harmon complimented staff for acquiring community input.
' Ron Harmon moved to recommend Council adopt the resolution authorizing ;
grant applications to the Interagency Committee for Outdoor Recreation to
fund the development of 132nd Avenue Neighborhood Park, Eagle Creek
Neighborhood Park, Riverview Community Park, and West Hill Neighborhood
Park. Bob O'Brien seconded and the motion passed 3-0.
9. Interagency Committee for Outdoor Recreation Grant Application Resolution for
' Farmland Preservation - Authorize
Lori Flemm clarified that the Wildlife and Recreation Program Farmland Preservation
Category is a new IAC program implemented to preserve farmlands. Funds are used
' to purchase development rights so that property remains farmland Staff is currently
pursuing funding for the acquisition of farmland adjacent to the Green River and
across the river from Riverview Park.
Bob O'Brien moved to recommend Council adopt the resolution authorizing
grant application to the Interagency Committee for Outdoor Recreation,
Washington Wildlife and Recreation Program Farmland Preservation
' Category, in pursuit of funding the acquisition of property adjacent to the
Green River and across the river from Riverview Community Park. Ron
Harmon seconded and the motion passed 3-0.
' Additional Discussion: Bob O'Brien asked about the distribution of flyers relating the
Senior Center Deli. Acting Director Lon Hogan responded that no outside advertising for the
' Deli and flyers are printed for use at the center only.
The meeting adjourned at 4:34 p.m.
1 Respectfully submitted,
Teri Petrole
Council Committee Recorder
' Parks and Human Services Committee Meeting Minutes
May 25,2006-Page 3
PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE MINUTES
July 10, 2006
COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT: Committee Chair Debbie Raplee was unable to make the
meeting. Committee Member Ron Harmon and Tim Clark were present. The meeting was called to
order at 5:40 p.m.
Approval of Minutes Dated June 19, 2006
Committee Member Harmon moved to approve the minutes of June 19, 2006. The motion was
seconded by Clark and passed 3-0, with Debbie Raplee's concurrence.
Contract/Congressional/Legislative Support w/Thompson Smitch Consulting Group
— Tim Thompson, Consultant
Mike Mactutis, Environmental Engineering Manager, stated that this contract will provide the City,
on behalf of the Water Shed Resource Inventory Area 9 (WRIA 9), support to secure the FY07
Energy and Water Appropriation request (not FY06 as stated in the memo). Mike mentioned that
Mr. Thompson has been used in the past by the City of Kent.
Harmon moved to recommended authorization for the Mayor to sign the contract, upon
concurrence of the language therein by the City Attorney and Public Works Director, with
Thompson Smitch Consulting Group for $70,000 to provide the City for Kent assistance to
secure the FY07 Energy and Water appropriation The motion was seconded by
' Clark and passed 3-0, with Debbie Raplee's concurrence. Clark will contact Raplee to
discuss any questions she may have.
Information Only/Transportation Master Plan (TMP) Public Involvement/Public Outreach
Report
Jodi Kettleson, Consultant with CH2M Hill gave an overview of what her Job is and then went over
the Stakeholder Involvement report. She encourages citizens and business owners alike to go to
the City web site and see what the TMP is all about www.ci.kent wa us/transportation/TMP .
' No motion required, information only
Larry updated committee members regarding two current Public Works projects, Pacific Highway
and Kent Kangley/Clark Springs road conditions. No decisions were made, comment only.
Adiourned:
The meeting was adjourned at 6:43 p.m.
INext Meeting Scheduled for:
Monday, July 17, 2006, 5:00 p.m.
CherJUJ�
itV,
Administrative Assistant III
' Page 1 of I
P�runWaammsuppon\ewc�t«N+,omw aoe
CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS
' A.
' EXECUTIVE SESSION
ACTION AFTER EXECUTIVE SESSION
1 '