Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Meeting - Council - Agenda - 12/09/2003 AG EN DA City of Kent City Council Meeting Agenda • December 9, 2003 Mayor Jim White Councilmembers Judy Woods, Council President Tim Clark Julie Peterson Connie Epperly Bruce White Leona Orr Rico Yingling KENT WASHINGTON City Clerk's Office SUMMARY AGENDA KENT CITY COUNCIL MEETING KENT December 9, 2003 WASHINGTON Council Chambers 7.00 p.m. MAYOR Jim White COUNCILMEMBERS Judy Woods, President Tim Clark Connie Epperly Leona Orr Julie Peterson Bruce White Rico Yingling 1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE—American Legion Honor Guard Flag Salute 2. ROLL CALL 3 CHANGES TO AGENDA A FROM COUNCIL, ADMINISTRATION, OR STAFF B. FROM THE PUBLIC 4. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS A Employee of the Month B. Green Business of the Year Award C. Introduction of Appointees 5 PUBLIC HEARINGS A Comprehensive Plan Amendment— Capital Improvements Plan 2004-2009— 12�hnance—Adopt 6. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Minutes of Previous Meeting —Approve B Payment of Bills—Approve C. Kent Reporter Contract—Approve D. Grant from State of Washington Department of Health, Office of Emergency Medical and Trauma Prevention—Accept E Vehicle and Equipment Surplus and Sale—Approve F. 2004 Kent Lodging Association Contract and Budget—Approve G S. 248th Street Improvements, (94th Avenue S —100th Avenue SE) Project— Accept as Complete H. 2004 City Art Plan 2004-2009— Approve 1. King County Artist-in-School Project Grant—Accept and Amend Budget J. Reimbursement for Street Tree Replacement—Accept and Amend Budget K. 2003 LTGO Councilmanic Bondnance—Adopt L. Accounts Receivable Wri Off—Approve M 2003 Budget Adjustmer O inance—Adopt 3 b15 N Comprehensive Plan Amendment— School Districts' Capital Facilities Plans ;ainance—Adopt 3 V 11\ O. Revisions to Kent City Code Chapter 12 13 — School District Impact Fees Or nance—Adopt 31o15 .1 V P. 2003 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment Or nance-Adopt • Q 2003 Zoning Implementatiolj�inance—Adopt 3611 R. Pmeridge Final Plat—Approve (continued next page) SUMMARY AGENDA CONTINUED • S. Alvin's Pond Final Plat—Approve T. Autumn Glen Final Plat—Approve U. Kent Land Use and Planning Board Appointment and Re-appointment—Confirm V Kent Bicycle Advisory Board Re-appointments—Confirm W Kent Arts Commission Re-appointment— Confirm X. Kent Human Services Commissio ppointment and Re-appointments —Confirm Matncula Consular Identificaho Re lution - Adopt ), 2• f Kira�AzW 7 OTABUSINESS ! �� A Streamlined Sales Tax fe'olution—Adopt B. 2003 Property Tax 1/o Statutory Adjustment for 2 4 Budgetnance—Adopt C 2003 Property Tax Total Levy fo 004 Budget Or ance—Adopt 3 b(,4 D 2004 Final Budget Ado —�nance 3(e10 E Outside Utility Service r aiance—Adopt 3 V1 k F- A1 ifoculct S. BIDS A Upper Meridian Creek Box Culvert Supply Contract 9 REPORTS FROM STANDING COMMITTEES AND STAFF 10 REPORTS FROM SPECIAL COMMITTEES • 11. CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS A• e ,,k V� 6. t_ot+q pray 12. EXECUTIVE SESSION 0A �abor Negotiations e VUA 13 ACTION AFTERS EXtCUTIVE SESSION 14. ADJOURNMENT NOTE. A copy of the full agenda packet is available for perusal in the City Clerk's Office and the Kent Library. The Agenda Summary page is on the City of Kent web site at www ci.kent wa.us. • An explanation of the agenda format is given on the back of this page Any person requiring a disability accommodation should contact the City Clerk's Office in advance at (253) 856-5725. For TDD relay service call the Washington Telecommunications Relay Service at 1-800-833-6388. A W C C q T O N V a O O ° o` a cT� ov ay v2 "E °°d A ' c ° >a vGoLAa o > o c £ o O C G i V C '^ Y a�S a s ' v L J c C C g a r N� , f° a a _r m y a- E a "�L 06 C U a E C L Gai rp a O c >S U=d L V '^ a J m .J U._ V Ga a � m�tC a L 0— ...� Ca� Oa E • C U L R L �j C C c VC a s q W L a a I g a O R J v, C A T p T ° mac= O �cLJu ° Emca c ED � uaa °Dm0Jo � G u _ ° 00 AJ > _iwcEE a � Ev0aoc� d v ca a� av CL c >L >_O'T vNi'OWO dm� OUL VNo Go OLL ; 7N ` a _ m � v • G >a '_ E O R C A C a C J.M J � N `v, O N G ' -�O a r q ~ au00i N V aogy3mo3c W = o.>w wEcq v� Tc mN `cG i o 15 a cm � 2 W v A °_ u ao N a cr E N c0 3 m E °J �U as r i� a ar J� L mY = $ E o o E m E w-0 E c <m �<m � Ac� B� Eu GJom0 c ° 5 °� =� ° 3 VE a -C m E c `v W i-0 v -° 'o E O - c oaoy �L g E W ` o a s ` 'o a cL E a ` a f' G ° a a O T�n _ c J a J a L O J F a V q C y �. �EE��ro E c O m Y O c O o V �n —S N z C a �n a a C . `h O a a�01 q U_ O > N p i c q _ o f=L ^_ J m u ` o c E v c v U a m N v 'o� c O rZ� wE E oa $ v � � wco °= m C od % �rC m d acaUcc a U O a a rp O V a l ° J a U L O a C R A L Y a cc Y V0U! v+ a j VL U O d E C V .a. E a 'L' E .p 00 L�p UFO w Gp C< _ a EUo° � LI.1 ° Lr� ° �A nL � �TEOLaOe ° d �� ? Nvr ` AM c> ^ V}� O C 7 in V O J C q > >; O V c Y > C Y Oi J 'a C a C a y O O S O L 0 L C U A G p�U"1 O m y C H U K y ~OC C u q E� 3 o a O C �L. u Z V E S L > C v E C 3 �n %n~ O >,a�= a+ O h ` O �n �°a EL° c 3 v z ELa Er o v i O o c _ o ` N -Wc �r�CL N ya 3 w o S L, i9 O _ �,_, C v� �n v� - N w- ; G E 'o V 0 ` . O._ a N N a 3 0vc N4cam � cd - ca EEmdUE E � „ '^ Mc1^. ca� f ah u aN L m S m L O m-O O a O C O-ZO 0 0 a� D O O W Ep O O. W q o aai N J a 6ai aai P CL Q F USA a GS V uU ro �UL E mrLU U OBE dUZi Smzi 0.3z a?Z • 0 L > •z: 0 O (A W= Z a Y� s c > 3 • E E E '� to N w C 3 s GC- c V1 UCC -C u ONE E `L N u'i Y N N G VV v nCDU C J� =C JCS V o j c p H- A aC O v1 O m 0 U, O n > J v A LLl = ° cF U a mZ Z U a o a C W ?p V q-0 c c 1 O O o f 'O a E V3u°. r-N YY moc V U d w d pia a c a N -C ° C C a N m J L T 0-5 ad C �. a N Oa0 W a vMj u` 3 .0 Y aw w- E ° a �U N L _ t G a.9 a J m— > v M O a q E u ? q n c L.Z q T C 3 j 7 C m S V q U V V � O O n c A A p o ° CL c `-° E = M. : n 0 U ucc • _ occ � � E _.� 3w a > J '" c �LR u > Zcm • V M p a J c� o E A'^ > ,� c-a Ab N �� a L o o a Tc E m- mo c > o � uES TV > q0 ° Aca ANc cL = Em 000 V y a C T in �`y q O. t V q mL Y .� .- Y j C` :=O cC < ou wM--c 0t4-1ag E 3 o c o o „M�... A V M o C = M m m O T v A : E a�° to q m u rt'° Oa v uo E C d 2 U G N j w C 0 O A O_EO U N V CL O c O 7 a Y 7 C� V ' a a C a cai ? u >` C U,C n d n61O aaoc nuc <u '> aE E�L < O < 1) 1 � CHANGES TO THE AGENDA Citizens wishing to address the Council will, at this time, make known the subject of interest, so all may be properly heard. A) FROM COUNCIL, ADMINISTRATION, OR STAFF B) FROM THE PUBLIC i PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS A) EMPLOYEE OF THE MONTH B) GREEN BUSINESS OF THE YEAR AWARD C) INTRODUCTION OF APPOINTEES . Kent City Council Meeting Date December 9 2003 Category Public Hearings I. SUBJECT: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT— CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN 2004-2009 — ORDINANCE—ADOPT 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: The Capital Improvement Plan includes all capital expenditures for the next six (6) years as described in the Comprehensive Plan and is updated and incorporated into the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan on an annual basis. Public input is encouraged as the City plans for future capital facilities and infrastructure improvements. The City has held two (2) public hearings on the 2004-2009 Capital Improvement Plan. However, because of the Washington Supreme Court's approval of Initiative 776, the City will now suffer an additional loss of approximately $800,000 per annum. As a result, we must amend the Capital Improvement Plan to reflect this annual loss and, because the amendment is so substantial, it is advisable to conduct an additional hearing on this amendment. 3. EXHIBITS: Ordinance 4 RECOMMENDED BY: Finance Director (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: A. Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds to close the public hearing. ,4.� B. Councilmember W'�noves, Councilmember 006�seconds to adopt Ordinance No 5W relating to CPA-2003-5 amending the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan to include the Capital Improvement Plan for 2004- 2009, which adoption shall be contingent upon Council approval of Consent Items N and O. DISCUSSION: L ,!� ACTION: U "► Ci Council Agenda Item No. 5A FINANCE May Miller, Director Phone 253-856-5260 Fax 253-856-6255 K E N T WASHINGTON Address 220 Fourth Avenue S Kent,WA 98032-5895 DATE: December 2, 2003 TO: Kent City Council Operations ommittee FROM: May Miller, Finance Director THROUGH- Mike Martin SUBJECT: 2004-2009 Capital Improvement Plan- Ordinance MOTION- I move to recommend adoption of Ordinance No. adopting the 2004- 2009 Capital Improvement Plan with incorporation into the Capital Facilities element of the Comprehensive Plan. SUMMARY: The 2004-2009 Capital Improvement Plan totals $129,510,000 for six years Water, Sewer, Drainage, and Transportation projects comprise 53% of these funds The balance provides funds for Public Safety, Parks, and Campus Capital Projects BUDGET IMPACT Yes, as noted BACKGROUND: Funding is pro,,ided from the Capital allocation of 25% of the sales tax, street taxes. utility rates, grants, state loans, and bonds Public Hearings were held for the CIP on September 16. 2003 and No\ember 18, 2003 An additional public hearing is proposed for December 9, 2003 due to the Washington State Supreme Court's approval of Initiative 776 which results in a loss of approximately $900.000 per year or $4.800,000 over six years Additionally, $770,247 of excise tax from licenses was lost in 2003 Balancing options include- 2003 $ 223,000 Delete 212st Street pavement rehab 2003 150,000 Transfer back from closed projects 2003 397,247 Utilize Fund Balance Kent Council Operations Committee Capital Improvement Plan 2004-2009-Oid 2004-2009 Capital Improvement Plan—Ordinance Page 2 2004 1,000,000 Defer Military Road & 260ih Intersection Improvement 2004 (1,400,000) Reallocate Kent Station & Parking Garage bond savings for: 2004 400,000 841h Ave. pavement rehab 2004 1,000,000 116`h Ave. improvements (256`h/Kent-Kangley/SR516) 2005 3,150,000 Funding deficit for 2005-2009 is shown as Other Funding Sources so the projects will be eligible for grants, loans, or bonds. However, if new revenues or other funds are not found the following projects will need to be eliminated or further deferred 2007-2008 Military Rd & 260'J' Intersection Improvement 2005 72°d Ave. (1961h Street to 2001h Street) 2007-2009 1-5 Interchange Other minor transportation changes include reducing the Fund Balance in 2006 to $7,417 as well as minor adjustments to Kent shuttle service and sidewalk rehabilitation The $4.000,000 Tech II bond issue was deleted from the Capital Improvement Projects in 2004 as these bonds are proposed to be approved by Council in 2003. A technical correction of$789,000 in a 2006 campus renovation project for security improvement and campus improvements is also included. Only the 2004 projects are budgeted in the 2004 Budget The 2005-2009 projects are only a plan and will be reviewed and updated each year This plan will be incorporated into the Capital Facility element of the Comprehensive Plan on an annual basis Kent Council Operations Committee Capital Improvement Plan 2004-2009-Ord ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, amending the City of Kent Comprehensive Plan to amend the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan to reflect a six-year plan for capital facilities projects (CPA-2003-5). I WHEREAS, the Washington State Growth Management Act ("GMA") requires internal consistency among comprehensive plan elements and the plans from , other jurisdictions, and WHEREAS, to assure that P comprehensive plans remain relevant and u to P up to the GMA allows amendments to the capital facilities element of comprehensive plans concurrently with the adoption or amendment of a city budget (RCW I36 70A.130(2)(ui)), and I WHEREAS,the City of Kent has established procedures for amending the Comprehensive Plan in chapter 12 02 of the Kent City Code,allowing amendment of the capital facilities element of the comprehensve plan concurrently with the adoption or amendment of the City budget and allows the City Council to hold the public hearing instead of the Land Use and Planning Board, and WHEREAS, the City of Kent Finance Department has submitted proposed amendments to the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan to identify a six-year plan for capital facilities projects, including costs and revenue i sources, and 1 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Capital Improvement Plan 2004-2009 WHEREAS,after providing appropriate public notice,the City Council of the City of Kent considered the requested comprehensive plan amendment and conducted a public hearing on the same on September 16,2003,November 18,2003,and December 9, 2003; and WHEREAS,on September 16,2003,the City provided the required sixty (60) day notification under RCW 36.70A.106 to the State of Washington of the City's proposed amendment to the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the sixty (60) day notice period has lapsed, and j WHEREAS,on December 9, 2003,the City Council for the City of Kent I j approved the Capital Facilities Element amendment CPA-2003-5 to reflect a six-year I plan for capital facilities projects, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS �I SECTION 1. -Amendment. The Capital Facilities Element of theCity of Kent Comprehensive Plan is hereby amended to reflect a six-year plan for capital facilities projects,as set forth in Exhibit"A"attached and incorporated by this reference i P J rP (CPA-2003-5). SECTION -Severabilm. If anyone or more sections,sub-sections,or sentences of this ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid,such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect. 2 Comprehensive Plan Amendments . Capital Improvement Plan 2004-2009 SECTION 3. -Effective Date This ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days from and after the date of passage as provided by law. I JIM WHITE, MAYOR �j ATTEST: 'I BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK I I APPROVED AS TO FORM- TOM BRUBAKER, CITY ATTORNEY PASSED day of 2003 APPROVED day of 2003 PUBLISHED day of 2003 I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No passed by the city council of the city of Kent,Washington, and approved by the mayor of the city of Kent as hereon indicated. I (SEAL) BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK I P CivJ,ORDINANCE.CompPl.AmrnJ Capiullmp.,cPl.m_'WJ 20U4 doc 3 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Capital Improvement Plan 2004-2009 EXHIBIT "A" 2004 - 2009 Capital Improvement Program Sources of Funds Amounts in 000's PW Trust Other Capital Fund Loan Sources Improvement Fund 8% 2% 10% Street Fund Utility Funds 18% Bond Proceeds Internal Service 41% Grants Funds 4 6% % a Sources of Funds 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Total Capital Improvement Fund 2,191 2,219 2,280 2,293 2,353 1,927 13,263 Street Fund 1,320 1,804 1,521 1,399 1,468 1,203 8,715 Utility Funds 1,737 8,563 2,979 6,122 2,593 1,397 23,392 Internal Service Funds 745 765 940 734 873 667 4,724 Grants 1,225 470 2,440 1,555 1,050 1,200 7,940 Bond Proceeds 18,737 29,000 5,000 52,737 PW Trust Fund Loan 9,000 1,500 500 11,000 Other Funding Sources 1,720 1,560 240 840 1,640 1,739 7,739 Total Sources of Funds 17,938 16,881 29,137 13,443 38,977 13,133 129,510 Not included in this plan: Estimated $40,000,000 voted bond issue for Public Safety 2004 - 2009 Capital Improvement Program Projects Forecast Amounts in 000's Transportation Utility Fund 18% Projects 35% Public Safety 8% arks, Recreation d General Government Community Services 21% 18% Projects 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Total Transportation 11,220 2,804 1,521 2,599 2,768 1,853 22,765 Public Safety 80 240 9,745 200 200 200 10,665 Parks, Recreation 3,891 2,789 5,595 3,568 3,323 3,796 22,962 & Community Services General Government 1,010 985 8,047 954 11,093 4,637 26,726 Utility Fund Projects 1,737 10,063 4,229 6,122 21,593 2,647 46,392 Total Projects 17,938 16,881 29,137 13,443 38,977 13,133 129,510 Not included in this plan: Estimated $40,000,000 voted bond issue for Public Safety TRANSPORTATION 2004-2009 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AMOUNTS IN 000's Total 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Sources of Funds Street Fund 8,715 1,320 1,804 1,521 1,399 1,468 1,203 i Reallocated Bond Proceeds 1,400 900 500 2 PW Trust Fund Loan 9,500 9,000 500 3 Other Funding Sources 3,150 500 700 1,300 650 Total Sources of Funds 22,765 11,220 2,804 1,521 2,599 2,768 1,853 Projects Funded Corridors 2 228th Street Corridor 6,900 6,900 2 228th BNSF Grade Separation 2,600 2,100 500 Arterials i 84th Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation 400 400 1 116th Ave Imp(256th-KK(SR516)) 1,000 500 500 Central Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation 500 500 Intersection &Road Improvements Military &260th Intersection Improvement 500 300 200 3 Military&260th Intersection Improvement 500 200 300 124th&248th Signal 250 250 116th &248th Signal 250 250 3 72nd Avenue(196th-200th) 500 500 3 1-5 &277th Intersection Improvement 2,150 500 1,000 650 Other Improvements Miscellaneous Asphalt Overlays 3,568 538 560 582 605 629 654 Slurry Seal Program 450 75 75 75 75 75 75 Sidewalk Rehabilitation and Installation 1,300 300 200 200 200 150 250 Neighborhood Traffic Control 225 75 75 75 City Wide Guardrail&Safety Improvement 180 30 30 30 30 30 30 Bike Paths 300 50 50 50 50 50 50 Kent Shuttle Service 210 30 35 35 35 35 40 Street Striping Program 532 87 89 89 89 89 89 Pavement Rating Survey 90 15 15 15 15 15 15 Signal Battery Backup 360 120 120 120 Total Projects Funded 22,765 11,220 2,804 1,521 2,599 2,768 1,853 OTHER GOVERNMENT PROJECTS 2004-2009 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AMOUNTS IN 000's Total 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Sources of Funds Capital Improvement Fund 2,530 345 460 465 420 420 420 From Central Services Fund 1,800 300 300 300 300 300 300 From Facilities Fund 2,924 445 465 640 434 573 367 i Councilmanic Bonds 30,137 16,387 10,000 3,750 Total Sources of Funds 37,391 1,090 1,226 17,792 1,154 11,293 4,837 Projects Funded Public Safety Police-Misc Equipment/Projects 500 100 100 100 100 100 Fire-Exhaust Extraction Systems 165 80 40 45 Fire-Misc Equipment/Projects 500 100 100 100 100 100 i Municipal Court 4,000 4,000 1 Fire-Breathing Apparatus Replacement 1,500 1,500 1 Fire-2 Engines& Ladder Truck 2,500 2,500 1 Police/Fire-Replacement Radios 1,500 1,500 Subtotal Public Safety 10,665 80 240 9,745 200 200 200 General Government Facilities Lifecycle Repairs 600 100 100 100 100 100 100 Roof Repairs 628 90 75 200 39 185 39 Floor Covering Replacements 350 75 75 75 60 65 Facility Painting 360 55 55 60 60 65 65 Sealcoat Parking Lots 355 35 65 95 65 45 50 Miscellaneous Furniture 270 45 45 45 45 45 45 Centennial Center Upgrades 361 45 50 65 65 68 68 Replacement Desktop Computer Equip 1,800 300 300 300 300 300 300 Arbitrage Services 115 15 20 20 20 20 20 Advanced Manufacturing Study 50 50 Miscellaneous Projects 1,200 200 200 200 200 200 200 1 Campus Expansion Renovation 5,137 2,137 3,000 1 East Hill Maintenance Facility (25%) 7,000 750 6,250 1 Shops Renovations(75%) 4,500 750 3,750 1 Kent Station 4,000 4,000 Subtotal General Government 26,726 1,010 985 8,047 954 11,093 4,637 Total Projects Funded 37,391 1,090 1,225 17,792 1,154 11,293 4,837 PARKS,RECREATION AND COMMUNITY SERVICES 2004-2009 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AMOUNTS IN 000's Total 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Sources of Funds R E ET 2nd Otr 10,283 1,771 1,684 1,740 1,798 1,858 1,432 CIP Grant Matching/Land Acquisition 450 75 75 75 75 75 75 Fee-in-lieu 116 41 25 50 Youthfreen 425 285 140 Donations/Contributions 560 141 46 6 106 6 255 State Grant 10 10 IAC Grants 4,595 540 430 1,375 900 1,050 300 Block Grant 245 75 65 105 Conservation Futures Grant 2,140 250 40 500 500 850 Youth Sports King County Grant 150 50 50 50 Other Grants 800 300 500 Alternative Funding 1,050 200 200 650 Other Funding Sources 1,038 153 349 34 34 284 184 1 Councdmanic Bonds 1 100 1,100 Total Sources of Funds 22,962 3,891 2,789 5,596 3,668 3,323 3,796 Proiects Funded Sports Fields Service Club Ballfields 2,116 1,090 1,026 Wilson Playfields 906 151 151 151 151 151 151 East Hill Youth Sports Complex 300 300 Service Club Park Acquisition 1,000 1,000 Commons Playfield Renovations 1,151 101 1,050 Soccer Field Development 500 500 Park Development r Kent Station Park Development 1,100 1,100 Clark Lake Land Acquisition 500 500 West Hill Park Development(Seattle Water) 715 15 700 Town Square Park 1,025 25 1,000 Clark Lake Development 2,080 380 400 1,300 228th Corridor Park/Trailhead (Russell Woods) 50 50 West Hill Amphitheater 80 10 70 Green River Corridor Acquisition 500 500 East Hill Park Land Acquisition 500 500 Kent Memorial Park Acquisition 1,000 1,000 Neighborhood Parks Development East Hill"X"Park/Skate Park Development 941 941 GR Disabled Fishing Access/Boeing Tract C 100 100 Turnkey Park Acq& Parking Lot Development 85 85 Glenn Nelson Improvements-Field Renov 76 76 Clark Lake Management Plan 50 50 Eagle Creek Park Development 270 20 250 Van Doren's Park River Emergency Access 20 20 Off-Leash Park 20 20 Glen Nelson Urban Forestry 10 10 Botanical Garden 10 10 Panther Lake Neighborhood Park Acquisition 310 310 132nd Street Park Development 775 25 750 Rlverwalk/Rlvervlew Park Development 563 13 550 S 272nd St Neighborhood Park Development 676 90 586 International Parks Acquisition/Development 40 40 Kronisch Park Development 61 61 i PARKS,RECREATION AND COMMUNITY SERVICES 2004-2009 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AMOUNTS IN 000's Total 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Major Capital&Lifecycle Renovations Life Cycle 1,650 275 275 275 275 275 275 Downtown Sidewalk Replacement/Gateway 180 90 90 Seven Oaks Park Improvements 75 75 Uplands Playfield Improvements 65 65 Demolition of Rental houses 75 50 25 Trails 54 9 9 9 9 9 9 Big Blue Mobile Computer Lab 85 85 Tudor Square Renovations 55 55 Pine Tree Park Improvements 619 19 600 Spnngwood Park Improvements 65 65 West Fenwick Renovations 353 35 18 300 Kiwams Tot Lot#1 Improvements 65 65 Van Doren's Park Improvements 51 51 Kent Memorial Park Renovations 151 1 150 Soccer Field Renovation 900 900 Planning-Architecture&Engineering Grant Matching Funds for Land Acquisition 450 75 75 75 75 75 75 Adopt-A-Park 240 40 40 40 40 40 40 Architect/Engineering 150 25 25 25 25 25 25 Master Plans 60 10 10 10 10 10 10 Swimming Pool/Comm Center Feasibility Study 50 50 Planned Giving Program 33 33 Vandalism Prevention Program 6 6 Total Projects 22,962 3,891 2,789 5,595 3,568 3,323 3,796 . WATER,SEWER AND STORMWATER DRAINAGE 2004-2009 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AMOUNTS IN 000's Total 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Sources of Funds Water Fund 1,986 87 91 94 264 710 739 Water Fund-Tacoma Pipeline Reallocation 11,000 550 6,400 250 3,800 Drainage Utility Fund 6,760 900 1,510 1,650 1,450 1,250 Sewer Utility Fund 3,646 200 562 985 608 633 658 PW Trust Fund Loan 1,500 1,500 1 Utility Revenue Bonds 21,500 1,250 19,000 1,250 Total Sources of Funds 46,392 1,737 10,063 4,229 6,122 21,593 2,647 Projects Funded General Protects 1 East Hill Maintenance Facility (75%) 20,000 1,250 18,750 i Shops Renovations (25%) 1 500 250 1,250 Total General Protects 21,500 1,250 19,000 1,250 Sanitary Sewer Miscellaneous Sewer Replacements 3,246 200 562 585 608 633 658 Sewer Extension for Easthill Shop 400 400 Total Sanitary Sewer 3,646 200 562 985 608 633 658 . Stormwater Drainage Management Horseshoe Acres Pump Station 10 10 Soos Creek Basin Improvements 4700 900 1,000 900 950 950 72nd Avenue (196th-200th) 500 500 1-5&277th Intersection Improvement 300 300 124th Ave&248th Street Improvement 250 250 BNSF Grade Separation 1,500 1,500 116th Ave Impr(256th to Kent Kangley) 1,000 500 500 Total Stormwater Drainage 8,260 900 3,010 1,650 1,450 1,250 Water Projects Second Supply Payment 5,500 5,500 intertie Connection 650 650 East Hill Reservoir 2,350 2,350 Clark Spring HCP 300 300 Miscellaneous Water Improvements 31456 250 250 250 1,465 608 633 3-Year Lrg Mtr&Vault Replacement Frog 235 35 37 38 40 41 43 Update Kent's Water Comprehensive Plan 150 150 Hydrant Replacement Program 345 52 54 56 59 61 63 Total Water 12,986 637 6,491 344 4,064 710 739 Total Projects Funded 46,392 1,737 10,063 4,229 6,122 21,593 2,647 CITY OF KENT FUTURE BOND ISSUES October 31,2003 Bond lsaue Purpose 2002(3) 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 COUNCILMANIC(LTGO) Gan GoVt 1 TeCp Plan 2 (36m110yr) 2 000 000 3526,000 Gen GoVI 2 Campus ExpanslonfRenovalion 1,200 000 2 137 DOO 3000000 Gen Gov't East Hill Maintenance Facility(25%) 750 DDO 6 250 000 Gen Gott Stops Renovation(75%) 750,000 3,750,000 Gan GoVt Municipal Court Building 4 OOD,ODO Gan Govt Saturday Market Building 662,389 Park 3 East Hill Sports Complex 1,800 ODD Street 4 Kent Station Development 3700000 Gan Gov't 5 Kent Station Development 2,700 000 Park 6 Kent Station Park Land(municipal lot) 1 100 000 Street 7 Conafors/SbeetstTraffic 2200,000 Pubic Safety Fee_Breathing Apparatus 1 500000 Pubic Safety Fire-2 Fire Engines 6 Ladder Truck 2 500 DOO Pubic Safety Police/Fire-Replacement Radios 1 500 000 Gen GoVt Kent Station 41(Taxable) 1 215 611 Gen Gov't Kant Station a2(Taxable) 4000,000 Gan Gov't Refunding LTGO 1992 2 114 000 Sub-Total 13 600 000 7 518 000 0 0 17,487 000 0 10 000,000 3 750 000 VOTED Public Safety Pubic Safety Projects 40000 000 Sub-Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 400000D0 REVENUE Utility East Hill Mamt Facility(75%) 1 250 000 18 750,000 Utility Stops Renovaton(25%) 250 OW 1 250 000 Sub-Total 0 0 0 0 1 250 000 0 19 000 000 1 250 D00 LID's LID s Venous 1 363 439 1 255 ODD 13 000 000 Sub-Total 0 1 363 439 1 255 000 13 000 000 0 0 0 0 TOTAL FUTURE DEBT ISSUES 13 600 000 8 881 439 1 255 000 13 000 000 16 737 000 0 29 D00 000 45 000 000 CITY OF KENT BOND CAPACITY October 31,2003 1 5%of Less Future Bonded Debt Percent of Net Duel Percent of Assessed Assessed Courtalmamc Counnlmana: Remaimig Capacity Remaining Capacity valuation(1) Valuation Debt Debt Capacity Used Capacity(2) Used 01131/98 5 073,523 220 76 102 848 (45 545 206) 0 30 557 643 59 8% 44 067 543 42 1% 12f31 f99 6 468 731 941 97 030 979 (60 337 630) 0 36 693 349 62 2% 49 073 3,49 49 4% 06/301D0 6 468 731 941 97 030 979 (60 019 175) 0 37 011 804 61 9% 49 391 804 49 1% 12/31700 7 130 8B6 435 1 D6 963 297 (70 371 685) 0 36 591 612 65 8% 48 496 294 54 7% 12f31/Of 7 582 349 300 113 735 240 (74 956 930) 0 38 778 310 65 9% 49 999 827 56 0% 12/31/02 8 175 782 374 122 636 736 (04 174 531) 0 38 462,205 68 6% 48,967 212 60 1% *12131103 8,690 469 982 130 357,050 (67 829 413) (7 516 000) 55 009 637 57 8% 64,754 450 50 3% 12131/04 8 994 636 431 134 919 546 (63 651 491) (6 287 000) 64 981,056 51 8% 73 956 056 45 2% 12/31/05 9 309 448 706 139 641 731 (59 583 042) (5 650 000) 74 408 689 46 7% 82 578 689 40 9% 1 WIM6 9 635 279 411 144 529 191 (55 309 091) (22 350 000) 66 062 100 53 7% 74 102 100 48 7% 12/31107 9 972 514,191 149 587 713 (51 206 140) (21 078 fi24) 77 222 949 48 4% 83 647 949 44 1% 12/31 M8 10 321 552 187 154 823 283 (47 256 022) (30 081 725) 77 485 535 50 0% 82 955 535 46 4% 12/31109 10 682 806 514 160 242 098 (43 078,868) (32 512 747) 84 650 483 47 2% 89,170 483 44 4% 12/'31/10 11 056 704 742 165 850,571 (39 276 479) (31 023 468) 95 548 624 42 4% 99058624 40 3% (1)Assessed vat om for 20031s an esbrhate Amounts for 2004 forward assume assessed valuation increases at 2 0 perrant par year wow estimated inflation plus 1 5%for new mnabucbon (2)TOW a ndurad by Enterprise Furid Debt that is Supported by Gall and Drainage Furals (3)Data isswnrua for 2002 am aaiuded tar the Courlalnan¢Debt totals rnsmad of FWum Counalmana;Debi siMe bay he.been,.Sued 'Artnunfe do rat mdude debt rasuance or bond rsaarrca woor CONSENT CALENDAR 6. City Council Action: �� ) � Councilmember Utz U rd moves, Councilmember seconds to approve Consent Calendar Items A through-Y� _ g �iY i A oj c 1" �ro Discussion Action s 6A. Approval of Minutes. Approval of the minutes of the regular Council meeting of November 18, 2003. 6B. Approval of Bills. Approval of payment of the bills received through November 14 and paid on November 14 after auditing by the Operations Committee on November 18, 2003. Approval of checks issued for vouchers: Date Check Numbers Amount 11/14/03 Wire Transfers 1549-1560 $1,028,635.58 11/14/03 Prepays & 555550 419,876.65 11/14/03 Regular 556131 984,981.01 $21433,493.24 Approval of checks issued for pa roll for October 16 through October 31 and paid on November 5, 2003: Date Check Numbers Amount 11/5/03 Checks 273525-273813 $ 230,157.19 11/5/03 Advices 155305-155961 1,177,875.92 $1,408,033.11 Council Agenda Item No. 6 A-B • KEN T Kent City Council Meeting W A 5 N I N G T O N November 18, 2003 The regular meeting of the Kent City Council was called to order at 7.00 p m. by Mayor White. Councilmembers present. Clark, Epperly, Orr, Peterson, White, Woods and Yingling (CFN-198) CHANGES TO AGENDA A From Council, Administration or Staff. (CFN-198) Executive Session was added by Martin Consent Calendar Item R was removed by Councilmember Peterson. B From the Public. (CFN-198) Continued Communication Items A, B and C were added at the request of citizens. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS A Mavor's 2004 Budget Presentation. (CFN-198) Mayor White gave his annual budget presentation, noting that the 2004 budget brings the city staff per capital ratio to its lowest point in decades, protects public safety and other important services, and acknowledges the devastating effect of the recession and Initiative 776 B Economic Development Update. (CFN-198) Nathan Torgelson presented the monthly update of economic development in the city. C Introduction of Appointees. (CFN-198) Mawr White introduced Dr Natalie Ellington, his appointee to the Independent Salary Commission, and noted that Jay Thornton is his re-appointee to the Kent Arts Commission. PUBLIC HEARINGS A 2004 Annual Budget (Second Hearing). (CFN-186) This date has been set for the second hearing on the 2004 budget B. Capital Improvement Plan 2004-2009 (Second Hearing). (CFN-77-)) This is the second and final public hearing on the 2004-2009 Capital Improvement Plan The Capital Improvement Plan includes all capital expenditures for the next six years as described in the Comprehensive Plan and is updated and incorporated into the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan on an annual basis C. 2003 Tax Lew for 2004 Budget. (CFN-104) This date has been set for the public hearing on the 2003 Tax Levy for the 2004 Budget CONSENT CALENDAR WOODS MOVED to approve Consent Calendar Items A though S, with the exception of Item R which was removed from the agenda by Council member Peterson Orr seconded and the motion carried. A. Approval of Minutes. (CFN-198) The minutes of the regular meeting of November 4, 2003, were approved. B Approval of Bills. (CFN-104) Payment of the bills received through October 31 and paid on October 31 after auditing by the Operations Committee on November 4, 2003 were approved I Kent City Council Minutes November 18, 2003 Approval of checks issued for vouchers- Date Check Numbers Amount 10/31/03 Wire Transfers 1535-1548 S 993,541.79 10/31/03 Prepays & 554825 983,113 08 10/31/03 Regular 555549 2,742,242 46 S4,718,897.33 C Government Relations Services Contract. (CFN-1216) The 2003 Government Affairs contract with Doug Levy of Outcomes by Levy was approved. D. Resolutions Authorizing Three Applications to Interagencv Committee for Outdoor Recreation Grants. (CFN-I 18) Resolution Nos. 1658, 1659, and 1660,which authorize the Parks, Recreation, and Community Services Director to make formal application to the Interagency Committee for Outdoor Recreation for funding assistance to make facility improvements at Glenn Nelson Park and to assist in financing the cost of facility maintenance at Kent Memorial Park and Uplands Playfield were adopted E. Linda Johnson Memorial Donation. (CFN-104) $1,600 00 from the Kent Downtown Partnership for a memorial bench to honor Linda Johnson, a former president of the Kent Downtown Partnership and a civic leader who devoted much of her life to the betterment and improvement of downtown Kent was accepted. F. Sale of Properties at Meadow Ridge Short Plat. (CFN-239) The Public Works Director was authorized to commence procedures to sell the properties at the southeast quadrant of S.E. 2741h Street and 108`h Avenue S E G Washington State Department of Transportation Participation Agreement for Pacific Highwav North Phase. (CFN-1271) The Mayor was authorized to sign a Participation Agreement with Washington State Department of Transportation in the amount of S77,000 for the design of the North Phase Pacific Highway South HOV Lanes Asphalt Concrete Overlay upon approval by the Public Works Director and the City Attorney, and to establish a budget H. Interlocal Agreement with Soos Creek Water and Sewer District. (CFN-1038) The Mayor was authorized to sign an Interlocal Agreement with Soos Creek Water and Sewer District for provision of water and sewer service by the District within the City subject to the Public Works Director's and the City Attorney's approval. I. Boeing and Mill Creek Improvements. (CFN-1038) The Boeing & Mill Creek Improvements Project was accepted as complete and release of the retainage to SCI Infrastructure, LLC, upon standard releases from the state and release of any liens was authonzed J. 2003 Traffic Striping Project . (CFN-1282) The 2003 Traffic Striping project was accepted as complete and release of the retainage to Stripe Rite, Inc , upon standard releases from the state and release of any liens was authorized. K. COPS Homeland Security Grant. (CFN-122) The COPS Homeland Security Overtime Program grant award in the amount of S51,252 for the Kent Police Department was accepted, and 2 Kent City Council Minutes November 18, 2003 establishment of budget documents for additional overtime for officers working in activities focused on homeland security and violent and drug-related cnmes was authorized L. Consolidated Food Services Contract. (CFN-122) The contract with Consolidated Food Management for the period of 1/1/2004 through 12/31/2004, without going out to contract bid, was authorized M Target Grant For DVD Camera. (CFN-122) The grant award from Target in the amount of S1,375 to purchase audio/video equipment was accepted. N. Mn2 Countv Public Health Youth Conference Grant. (CFN-122) The Public Health — Seattle & King County mini-grant in the amount of$4,000 to support the 2003 Youth Conference sponsored by the Kent Police Department was accepted, and establishment of budget documents was authorized O King Countv Youth Conference Grant. (CFN-122) The King County mini-grant in the amount of S1,200 to support the 2003 Youth Conference sponsored by the Kent Police Department A as accepted, and establishment of budget documents was authorized P. Occupational Health Services (OHS) Contract Extension. (CFN-122) The"Addendum Five and Extension to Contract for Services" N�rth Occupational Health Services for the period from January 1, 2004 through June 30, 2004 for certain required medical services to the inmates of City of Kent Corrections Facility was approved Q. Reappointment to Kent Arts Commission. (CFN-839) The Mayor's re-appointment of Jay Thornton to continue serving as a member of the Kent Arts Commission and his new appointment will continue until 10/31/2007 was confirmed S Appointment to Independent Salary Commission. (CFN-1274) The Mayor's appointment of Dr Natalie E Ellington to serve as a member of the Independent Salary Commission was confirmed OTHER BUSINESS A 2003 Annual Comprehensive Plan Land Use and Zoning Map Amendments. (CFN377&131) At the Land Use and Planning Board's public hearing on October 27, 2003, they recommended approval of the Cofield request for higher density residential, and denial of the Lotto and City of Kent Parks Department requests for changes from residential to commercial Bill Osborne of the Planning Services Office noted receipt of correspondence from Barghausen Consulting Engineers regarding the Lotto amendment and from Marlene Kelly regarding both the Lotto and Parks amendments WOODS MOVED to make the letters part of the public record Epperly seconded and the motion carried Osborne explained the three proposals and the criteria used to making the recommendations He concluded by noting that staff recommends conditional approval of the Cofield proposal, dental of the Lotto proposal, and approval of the Parks proposal. ORR MOVED to approve the Land Use and Planning Board recommendation of approval of the Cofield Amendment with the condition that approval is contingent upon completion and recording of storm water and open space tracts on the subject site with the City of Kent Woods seconded and the motion carried 3 Kent City Council Minutes November 18, 2003 ORR MOVED to approve the Land Use and Planning Board recommendation of denial of the Lotto Amendment. Woods seconded. After brief comments from White and Yingling, the motion carried with White opposed. Later in the meeting, Eric LaBne of Barghausen Consulting Engineers, stated that he had described their proposal regarding the Lotto property at the Land Use and Planning Board meeting, and reiterated their willingness to work with the City as to size. ORR MOVED to modify the Land Use and Planning Board recommendation of denial of the City of Kent Parks Department Amendment, and approve the requested zoning change subject to the following conditions. 1. that if the private individual who proposed to develop a senior onented park and asked for a few months to do so is able to demonstrate that that will happen and that the park will be owned and operated by that private entity and remain a public park in perpetuity by no later than March 15, 2004, the property zoning would not change, it would remain single family, and 2. that if that proposal fails, the zoning change would be granted effective March 16,2004 Woods seconded Orr explained the reasons for her motion, noting that if opposition to the original plan becomes such that the City is unable to do that, the second condition would provide citizens the best possible return for their investment Clark offered a friendly amendment that if there were an alternative park project, it would be subject to a Council vote. Orr and Woods agreed After a lengthy discussion by Council members involving rezoning, funding, alternative sites, deadlines and so forth, the following people spoke in opposition to rezoning the Parks property and building a skate park there. Elizabeth Page, 24121 116ih .Avenue SE, Apt 122; Pierre Travis, 11305 SE Kent Kangley Road, Harold Armstrong, 24121 116ih Avenue SE, Apt 201, Russ Hanscom, 24121 116`h Avenue SE; Bob O'Brien, 1131 Seattle St , Ted Nixon, 911 E Temperance St , Ted Kogita, 22527 Reith Road, George Hutchison, 11224 SE 320" St , Auburn, Steven Yates, owner of Arbor Village; Martin P1ys, 3004 S. 256; Ann Larson, 24509 128ih Place SE. Eric LaBrie of Barghausen Consulting Engineers, 18215 72nd Avenue South, pointed out that this item could be remanded to the Hearing Examiner After further discussion by Council members, upon a roll call vote, Orr's motion to modify the recommendation of denial of the City of Kent Parks Department Amendment subject to three conditions passed with Clark, Epperly, Orr and Woods in favor, and Peterson, White and Yingling opposed. REPORTS G. Administrative Reports. (CFN-198) Martin stated that the Executive Session relating to property disposition will last approximately ten minutes and that no action afterward is expected. CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS A. Kent Station. (CFN-171) Bob O'Brien, 1131 Seattle St., urged the Council to move forward on a contract with the developer. 4 Kent City Council Minutes November 18, 2003 B. Independent Salary Commission. (CFN-1274) Ted Kogrta, 25227 Reith Road, questioned isthe residence of the last appointee to the Commission Mayor White responded with the information C City Property. (CFN-239) Martin Plys, 3004 S 256, suggested selling the Borden Property and the Kent Market, in light of budget problems EXECUTIVE SESSION (CFN-198) The meeting recessed to Executive Session at 9 05 p m , and reconvened at 9 25 p m ADJOURNMENT (CFN-198) At 9 25 p m , WOODS MOVED to adjourn Orr seconded and the motion camed X&Z-4'� Brenda Jacober, C IC City Clerk s 5 Kent City Council Meeting Date December 9, 2003 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: KENT REPORTER CONTRACT — APPROVE 2 SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Operations Committee, approve and authonze the Mayor to sign the 2004 Kent Reporter Contract. The City of Kent began publishing the Kent Connections City Newsletter in the Kent Reporter in 1998. The content and design are completed in-house and forwarded to the Kent Reporter for publication and distribution. 3. EXHIBITS: Memorandum and contract 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Operations Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5 UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: S SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION- Council Agenda Item No. 6C ADMINISTRATION Mike H Martin, Chief Administrative Officer Phone 253-856-5710 �f KENT Fax 253-856-6700 w" "'"�' " Address 220 Fourth Avenue S Kent WA 98032-5895 DATE December 2, 2003 TO Kent City Council FROM Dena Laurent, Assistant Chief Administrative Officer THROUGH Mayor Jim White SUBJECT 2004 Kent Reporter Contract for City Kent Connections Newsletter ACTION: Placed on the December 9, 2003 City Council Consent Agenda for adoption based on 3-0 recommendation from December 2, 2003 Council Operations Committee. Motion: I move to approve the 2004 Kent Reporter Contract for the purposes of publishing the City of Kent newsletter. SUMMARY: Please find attached a 2004 contract for publication of the Ctty's "Kent Connections" one- page newsletter in the Kent Reporter The City of Kent began publishing the Kent Connections City Newsletter in the Kent Reporter in 1998 The content and design are completed in-house and forwarded to the Kent Reporter for publication and distribution Today, the Kent Reporter is typically distributed to 68,000 Kent area addresses Council and community feedback on the newsletter has been positive and we recommend continuing the newsletter in 2004 We have included a total project cost of$52,000 in the 2004 Preliminary Budget If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 856-5708 RECOMMENDED BY: Staff BUDGET IMPACT: 2004• Not to exceed $52,000 and included in the 2004 Mayor's Budget to Council AGREEMENT . The CITY OF KENT and the KENT REPORTER agree to the following The City of Kent agrees to purchase display advertising in the Kent Reporter for the purpose of producing a City newsletter(Kent Connections)for the citizens of Kent, at a minimum frequency of once each month, and,the Kent Reporter agrees to publish and distribute at least one edition each month during the term of this agreement The term of the agreement shall cover the Kent Reporter issues of January 2004 through December 2004 Either party may terminate this agreement upon 30 days written notice The City of Kent agrees to purchase from the Kent Reporter one full page (equivalent to 65 column inches at$19 92 per column inch) at a monthly rate of$1,294 80 This price will include printing in black ink plus one extra spot color, the color to be determined by the Kent Reporter, in coordination with the City of Kent Full color maybe purchased for use in the ad at a cost of$125, per issue The page shall be placed as far forward in the editions in which the City newsletter appears as possible, unless an alternate location is agreed to by both the City of Kent and the Kent Reporter The City of Kent will have full control overthe name, editorial content, and layout of the City newsletter, and will provide the Kent Reporter with camera ready or electronic copy of the newsletter for production purposes In each edition of the Kent Reporter that includes the City newsletter, the Kent Reporter will provide the City of Kent with a front page teaser indicating that the City newsletter is included inside the newspaper The City of Kent and the Kent Reporter will mutually review and determine postal carrier routes for the publication's delivery This review shall ensure that the entire incorporated boundary of the City of Kent receives the publication These routes may be updated monthly as needed to accommodate changes in the City's incorporated boundaries The City of Kent will provide the Kent Reporter with pictures that are to be included in the City newsletter and the Kent Reporter will provide any scanning of half tones that may be needed The Kent Reporter agrees to direct mail 28,000 copies of the Kent Reporter to residents within the Kent city limits Additional copies will be produced and mailed at a marginal cost of$240 per 1,000 copies Five- hundred additional copies will be delivered to the City of Kent for the City's use at no extra cost The Kent Reporter also agrees to provide the City of Kent with certification from the post office verifying the number of copies mailed when requested by city officials CITY OF KENT KENT REPORTER 220 4th Avenue South King County Journal Newspapers Kent, WA 98032-5895 600 South Washington Avenue Kent, WA 98032-5707 Mayor Jim White Name Date Date Attest Kent City Clerk . APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: Kent City Attorney P,Cm I IFI L ES Ope nFtles\0216-2003\KentRepole 2004 Contract coc Kent City Council Meeting Date December 9, 2003 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: GRANT FROM STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, OFFICE OF EMERGENCY MEDICAL AND TRAUMA PREVENTION—ACCEPT 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Accept the grant funds received from the State of Washington and apply the funds toward the purchase of Acu-check Glucometers. Since 1998, This grant has been received from the State of Washington Department of Health, Office of Emergency Medical and Trauma Prevention. The purpose of these funds, provided through the Trauma Care Fund, is to assist our agency with meeting requirements to provide trauma care services to the public as a verified EMS and Trauma Prehospital service. These funds will be used to purchase Pelican Boxes, which will be used for aid kits on • our apparatus. 3. EXHIBITS: None 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Fire Chief Schneider and Public Safety Committee (3-0) (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES X 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: Revenue of S1,200.00 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Grant funds 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: • ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 6D Kent City Council Meeting Date December 9, 2003 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT SURPLUS AND SALE— APPROVE 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works Committee, authorization to declare the equipment and vehicles no longer needed by the City as surplus and authorize staff to appropriately dispose of the equipment as described and listed in the memorandum. 3. EXHIBITS: Public Works Director memorandum and list of surplus equipment • 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS. 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: • ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 6E PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Don E Wickstrom, P E Public Works Director Phone 253-856-5500 Fax 253-856-6500 K E N T Address 220 Fourth Avenue S W A S H I N G T G N - -- Kent WA 98032-5895 DATE: November 12,2003 TO: Mayor White and Kent City Council FROM: Don Wickstrom, Public Works Director THROUGH SUBJECT: Vehicle and Equipment Surplus MOTION: Recommend that the City Council authorize staff to appropriately dispose of the equipment as described in this memorandum and listed below. SUMMARY: The listed vehicles/equipment comply with current replacement policy guidelines and have been replaced The equipment will be sold at auction or sold to smaller cities BUDGET IMPACT The monetary returns from the auction will be incorporated into the fleet internal services reserve fund This is a positive budget impact BACKGROUND: Vehicle/Equipment List 3106 1993 Ford Aerostar Cargo Van, s/n 1FTDAI4U6PZB65381, 82316 miles, This vehicle was replaced and removed from service on 9/11,03 The vehicle has a work order history of repeated electrical problems and customer dependability complaints 3148 Kawasaki Police Motorcycle, s/n JKAKZCP26PB512106, 16,931 miles This vehicle was totaled in an accident on 9/3/03 and removed from service 5383 1993 Chevrolet,Vactor, Sewer Cleaning Truck, s/n 1GBT7H4J8PJ t04724, 127,688 miles This truck was replaced in 2002 but has remained in active service in the storm utility section of Public Works Operations Division Costs and maintenance hours needed to keep this vehicle in service are continuing to escalate We will watch for opportunities to sell this vehicle while some reasonable value remains 5391 1987 Kamatsu, FG20T Forklift, s/n 4087-6872F, 2,275 hours This vehicle was replaced and removed from active service in 2002 It has been borrowed and used for various purposes throughout the city over the past several months but it is no longer dependable Mayor White and Kent City Council 1 Surplus Whicle/ cluipment December 1,2003 8720 1995 Ford, S31 Superclub, s/n 1FBJS31H7SHB91154, 91,713 miles After this vehicle was replaced and removed from active service with the senior center it was reassigned to the motor pool The vehicle has again been removed from service due to an internal engine failure Mayor White and Kent City Council 2 Surplus Vehicle/Equipment December 1,2003 Kent City Council Meeting Date December 9, 2003 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: 2004 KENT LODGING ASSOCIATION CONTRACT AND BUDGET— APPROVE 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Operations Committee, approve and authorize the Mayor to sign the 2004 Kent Lodging Association contract and approve the budget allocation of$31,670. The Kent Lodging Association uses City lodging tax dollars to maintain a website, answer 1-800 calls, place advertising in tourism brochures and distribute the existing Kent Lodging Association brochure. 3. EXHIBITS: Memorandum and contract 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Operations Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION- ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 6F 171 ADMINISTRATION Mike H Martin, Chief Administrative Officer Phone 253-856-5710 Fax 253-856-6700 Address 220 Fourth Avenue 5 9 Kent, WA 98032-5895 KENT W.5H MEMORANDUM DATE December 2, 2003 TO Kent City Council Operations Committee THROUGH Mayor Jim White FROM Nathan Torgelson, Economic Development Manager • SUBJECT 2004 Kent Lodging Association Contract and Budget Attached please find a 2004 contract, budget and scope of work for the Kent Lodging Association The contract calls for a budget of $31,670 The Kent Lodging Association uses City lodging tax dollars to maintain a website, answer 1-800 calls, place M advertising in tourism brochures and distribute the existing Kent Lodging Association brochure If you have any questions, please contact me at 856-5703 172 CONTRACT FOR SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF KENT AND KENT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE THIS CONTRACT is made by and between the CITY OF KENT,a Washington municipal corporation (hereinafter the "City"). and KENT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, a Washington non-profit corporation (hereinafter the "Kent Chamber") RECITALS 1 It is the City's intent to increase occupancy at Kent hotels and motels, to promote Kent as a site for corporate meetings and events,and to promote tourism opportunities in Kent The City desires that Kent Chamber perform certain services to assist the City in this program 2 Kent Chamber shall create and implement a promotion campaign for the Kent Lodging Association NOW,THEREFORE,in consideration of the mutual promises set forth herein,it is agreed by and between the parties as follows I. DESCRIPTION OF WORK 1 1 Kent Chamber shall perform the work described in the Scope of Services attached hereto as Exhibit"A" and incorporated herein by this reference 11. PAYMENT 2 1 The City shall pay Kent Chamber an amount not to exceed $31,670 00 during the duration of this Contract(January 1,2004 through December 31, 2004) for the services performed as set forth in Exhibit"A " This is the maximum amount to be paid for the services contemplated in Section I of this Contract,and such amount shall not be exceeded without prior written authorization of the City in the form of a negotiated and executed Addendum to this Contract 22 The payment of funds to the Kent Chamber as established in this Contract shall be made on or following the dates set forth below follow ing appropriate documentation of the work performed pursuant to the work schedule set forth in Exhibit "A"as follows a Payment of$26,670 00 upon the execution of this Contract, and CONTRACT FOR SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF KENT AND KENT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE- I (November 25 200J) 173 b $5,000 00 upon completion of the contract, as set forth in Exhibit"A," and following submittal of a final report on or before December 31, 2004 It is understood that most of the work performed by the Kent Chamber is performed during the early part of the contract term and that significant costs are incurred during this time,therefore, the parties have agreed to the payment structure as set forth herein Final payment of funds are subject to satisfactory documentation of the completion of work schedules set forth in Exhibit"A" corresponding to the payments to be made by the City 23 The Kent Chamber of Commerce shall submit a written final report as set forth in Section 2 2 above to the City. In addition, the Kent Chamber of Commerce shall provide status reports at each City of Kent Lodging Tax Advisory Committee meeting. 24 The City, or its authorized representative, shall have the authority to inspect,audit, and copy on reasonable notice and from time to time any records of Kent Chamber regarding its billings,payments,or work under this Contract to verify matching funds and expenditures made for the work performed herein. 2.5 In the event the Scope of Services is modified or changed so that more or less work or time is required by Kent Chamber, and such modification is reached by mutual agreement of the parties to this Contract, the payment for services and maximum Contract amount shall be adjusted accordingly III. DURATION OF WORK 1 The City and Kent Chamber agree that work will begin on the services described in Section I herein on upon execution of this Contract and shall continue until December 31, 2004, unless this Contract is earlier terminated as provided for herein. IV. TERMINATION 4.1 Funding Limited. if the City receives reimbursement by any federal, state,or other source for the services described in Section I herein, and that funding is withdrawn, reduced, or limited in anyway, the City may summarily terminate this Contract Termination shall be effective ten (10) calendar days after Kent Chamber's receipt of the written notice by certified mail In the event of termination,the City shall pay for all services performed by Kent Chamber to the effective CONTRACT FOR SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF KENT AND KENT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE-2 (November25.1003) 174 date of tenmination, as described in a final report submitted to the City After termination,the City may copy all records and data within Kent Chamber's possession pertaining to the services described in Section 1,which may be used by the City without restriction and without liability or legal exposure to Kent Chamber 42 Termination for Failure to Prosecute Work or to Complete Work Satisfactorily If Kent Chamber refuses or fails to prosecute the work with such diligence as will ensure its completion within the time frames specified herein,or as modified or extended as provided in this Contract,then the City may, by written notice to Kent Chamber, give notice of its intention to terminate the Kent Chamber's right to proceed with the work On such notice, Kent Chamber shall have ten (10) calendar days to cure,to the satisfaction of the City or its representative, or the City shall send Kent Chamber a written termination letter which shall be effective upon Kent Chamber's receipt of the written notice by certified mail or personal delivery 43 Rights Upon Termination In the event of termination, the City shall pay for all services performed by Kent Chamber to the effective date of temunation, as described on a final invoice submitted to the City After termination,the City may take possession of all records and data within Kent Chamber's possession pertaining to this project which may be used by the City without restriction V. RELATIONSHIP OF PARTIES The parties intend that an independent contractor-employer relationship v,ill be created by this Contract No agent, employee, representative, or sub-contractor of Kent Chamber shall be or shall be deemed to be the employee, agent,representative,or sub-contractor of the City Kent Chamber will control and direct the performance and details of its services The City is interested only in the results obtained under this Contract None of the benefits provided by the City to its employees, including, but not limited to, compensation, insurance, and unemployment insurance are available from the City to the employees, agents,representatives,or sub-contractor of Kent Chamber Kent Chamber will be solely and entirely responsible for its acts and for the acts of Kent Chamber's agents, employees,representatives, and sub-contractors during the performance of this Contract, The City may,during the term of this Contract,engage other independent contractors to perform the same or similar work that Kent Chamber performs hereunder CONTRACT FOR SERVICES BETWEEN THE CiTY OF KENT AND KENT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE-3 (November25 1003) 175 0 VI. DISCRIMINATION In the hiring of employees for the performance of work under this Agreement or any sub- contract hereunder, the Consultant, its sub-contractors, or any person acting on behalf of such Consultant or sub-contractor shall not,by reason of race,religion,color, sex,national origin,or the presence of any sensory, mental, or physical disability, discriminate against any person who is qualified and available to perform the work to which the employment relates. Consultant shall comply with City Administrative Policy 1 2, Minority and Women Contractors, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit`13 " VII. INDEMNIFICATION Kent Chamber shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officers, officials,employees, agents and volunteers harmless from any and all claims,injuries,damages,losses or suits,including all legal costs and attorney fees, arising out of or in connection with the Kent Chamber's performance of this Contract,except for that portion of the injuries and damages caused by the City's negligence. The City's inspection or acceptance of any of Kent Chamber's work when completed shall not be grounds to avoid any of these covenants of indemnification Should a court of competent jurisdiction determine that this Agreement is subject to RCW 4 24 115, then, in the event of liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons or damages to property caused by or resulting from the concurrent negligence of the Kent Chamber and the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers, the Kent Chamber's liability hereunder shall be only to the extent of the Kent Chamber's negligence IT IS FURTHER SPECIFICALLY AND EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD THAT THE INDEMNIFICATION PROVIDED HEREIN CONSTITUTES THE KENT CHAMBER'S WAIVER OF IMMUNITY UNDER INDUSTRIAL INSURANCE,TITLE 51 RCW,SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS INDEMNIFICATION THE PARTIES FURTHER ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THEY HAVE MUTUALLY NEGOTIATED THIS WAIVER CONTRACT FOR SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF KENT AND KENT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE-4 (November25.2003) 176 The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement VIII. INSURANCE Kent Chamber shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Contract,insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the services hereunder by Kent Chamber, its agents, representatives,employees,or sub-contractors Before beginning work on the project described in this Contract, Kent Chamber shall provide a Certificate of Insurance evidencing 1 Commercial General Liability insurance written on an occurrence basis with hoots no less than $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence and $2,000,000 aggregate for personal injury, bodily injury and property damage Coverage shall include but not be limited to blanket contractual, products/completed operations/broad form property damage, explosion, collapse and underground(XCU) if applicable, and employer's liability, and 2 Professional Liability insurance with limits no less than $1.000,000 limit per I occurrence Any payment of deductible or self-insured retention shall be the sole responsibility of Kent Chamber The City shall be named as an additional insured on the Commercial General Liability insurance policy,with respect to the services performed by or on behalf of Kent Chamber and a copy of the endorsement naming the City as additional insured shall be attached to the Certificate of Insurance The City reserves the right to receive a certified copy of all the required insurance policies Kent Chamber's Commercial General Liability insurance shall contain a clause stating that coverage shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respects to the limits of the insurer's liability Kent Chamber's insurance shall be primary insurance as respects the City and the City shall be given thirty (30) days prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, of any cancellation, suspension or material change in coverage CONTRACT FOR SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF KENT AND KENT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE-5 (November25 1003) IX. ENTIRE AGREEMENT The written provisions and terms of this Contract,together with any Exhibits attached hereto, shall supersede all prior verbal statements of any officer or other representative of the City,and such statements shall not be effective or be construed as entering into or forming a part of or altering in any manner whatsoever,this Contractor the Contract documents The entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereunder is contained in this Contract and any Exhibits attached hereto All of the above documents are hereby made a part of this Contract and form the Contract documents as fully as if the same were set forth herein X. MODIFICATION No waiver, alteration, or modification of any of the provisions of this Contract shall be binding unless in writing and signed by a duly authorized representative of the City and Kent Chamber XI. ASSIGNMENT Any assignment of this Contract by Kent Chamber without the written consent of the City shall be void If the City shall give its consent to any assignment, this paragraph shall continue in full force and effect and no further assignment shall be made without the City's consent XII. WRITTEN NOTICE All communications regarding this Contract shall be sent to the parties at the addresses set forth below, unless notified to the contrary Any written notice hereunder shall become effective upon personal service or upon the date of mailing by registered or certified mail, and shall be deemed sufficiently given if sent to the addressee at the address stated in this Contract or such other address as may be hereafter specified in writing CITY OF KENT KENT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Nathan Torgelson Marcelle Pechler Economic Development Manager Executive Director City of Kent Kent Chamber of Commerce 220 Fourth Ave S. 524 West Meeker St , #H-1 Kent, WA 98032 Kent, WA 98035-0128 CONTRACT FOR SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF KENT AND KENT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE-6 (November 23,2003) 178 XI11. NON-WAIVER OF BREACH The failure of the City to insist upon strict performance of any of the covenants and agreements contained herein, or to exercise any option herein conferred in one or more instances shall not be construed to be a waiver or relinquishment of said covenants, agreements, or options, and the same shall be and remain in full force and effect XIV. RESOLUTION OF DISPUTES If any dispute arises between the City and Kent Chamber under any of the provisions of this Contract,jurisdiction of any resulting litigation shall be filed in King County Superior Court, King County,Washington This Contract shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington Each party shall be solely responsible for its costs, expenses, and attorney's fees incurred in any litigation arising out of the enforcement of this Contract XV. DUPLICATE ORIGINALS This document is executed in duplicate originals IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties have executed this Contract on the day and year first above written CITY OF KENT KENT CHAMBER By By Its Its Date Date APPROVED AS TO FORM: Tom Brubaker, Kent City Attorney CONTRACT FOR SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF KENT AND KENT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE-7 (November25,2003) 179 EXHIBIT"A' Kent Lodging Association 2004 Scope of Services and Budget Web ells Hosting �---- -- - - - -- $ —— 600 Content administration _ ____ _ _ __I$___ 3,400 Search_engine m_arkenng_ _ _ $ _ 3,600 Subtotal $ 7,600 Indivldual Traveler Collateral(Motel Brochures_ ___ Postage_ 100 Subtotal _ _$ _ 100 Meeting Planner 150 _ _ Postage_ _ _-- - — --- - --� -- -TS__ 100 Subtotal f__ I —- — — t$_ _ 250 Advertising______ ____--- 2005 WA Stale Visitors Guide _ _ _ $_ Toll tree number @$0 10/inn �$ 100 Subtotal $ 2,600 Tourism Services _Staff Time Tourism_Related calls inquiries, updating webslte,attending KLA and advisory board mtgs Payroll_ $ 720 Benefits ---- -- --- ---- --- $ - --1 900 Admin O/H(Office supplies utilities office space,etc) $ _ 10,500 Subtotal $ 21,120 Total _ _ _ _ $ 31,670 180 DECLARATION CITY OF KENT EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY POLICY The City of Kent is committed to conform to Federal and State laws regarding equal opportunity As such all contractors,subcontractors and suppliers who perform work with relation to this Agreement shall comply with the regulations of the City's equal employment opportunity policies The following questions specifically identify the requirements the City deems necessary for any contractor, subcontractor or supplier on this specific Agreement to adhere to An affirmative response is required on all of the following questions for this Agreement to be valid and binding If any contractor, subcontractor or supplier willfully misrepresents themselves with regard to the directives outlines, it will be considered a breach of contract and it will be at the City's sole determination regarding suspension or termination for all or part of the Agreement, The questions are as follows 1 I have read the attached City of Kent administrative policy number 1 2 2 During the time of this Agreement 1 will not discriminate in employment on the basis of sex, race,color,national origin,age,or the presence of all sensory, mental or physical disability 3 During the time of this Agreement the prime contractor will provide a written statement to all new employees and subcontractors indicating commitment as an equal opportunity employer 4 During the time of the Agreement 1, the prime contractor, will actively consider hiring and promotion of women and minorities 5 Before acceptance of this Agreement, an adherence statement will be signed by me, the Prone Contractor, that the Prime Contractor complied with the requirements as set forth above By signing below, I agree to fulfill the five requirements referenced above Dated this day of 200 By For Title Date EEO DOCUMENTS- I (Contract bhvn Kent Chamber and Cnj) (November 25, 2003) 181 0 CITY OF KENT ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY NUMBER- 12 EFFECTIVE DATE. January 1, 1998 SUBJECT. MINORITY AND WOMEN SUPERSEDES April 1, 1996 CONTRACTORS APPROVED BY Jim White, Mayor POLICY Equal employment opportunity requirements for the City of Kent will conform to federal and state laws All contractors, subcontractors, consultants and suppliers of the City must guarantee equal employment opportunity within their organization and, if holding Agreements with the City amounting to $10,000 or more within any given year, must take the following affirmative steps 1. Provide a written statement to all new employees and subcontractors indicating commitment as an equal opportunity employer 2. Actively consider for promotion and advancement available minorities and women An contractor, subcontractor, consultant or supplier who willfully disregards the Ci 's Y PP Y g ty nondiscrimination and equal opportunity requirements shall be considered in breach of contract and subject to suspension or termination for all or part of the Agreement. Contract Compliance Officers will be appointed by the Directors of Planning, Parks, and Public Works Departments to assume the following duties for their respective departments I Ensuring that contractors, subcontractors, consultants, and suppliers subject to these regulations are familiar with the regulations and the City's equal employment opportunity policy 2. Monitoring to assure adherence to federal, state and local laws, policies and guidelines. EEO DOCUMENTS-2 (Contract btwn Kent Chamber and City) (November 25, 2003) 182 CITY OF KENT EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMPLIANCE STATEMENT This form shall be filled out AFTER COMPLETION of this project by the Contractor awarded the Agreement I, the undersigned, a duly represented agent of Gm ary, hereby acknowledge and declare that the before-mentioned company was the prime contractor for the Agreement known as that was entered into on the_ (date) between the firm I represent and the City of Kent 1 declare that I complied fully with all of the requirements and obligations as outlined in the City of Kent Administrative Policy 1 2 and the Declaration City of Kent Equal Employment Opportunity Policy that was part of the before-mentioned Agreement Dated this day of 200_ By For Title Date EEO DOCUMENTS-3 (Contract btwn Kent Chamber and City) (November 25, 2003) Kent City Council Meeting Date December 9, 2003 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: S. 248TH STREET IMPROVEMENTS, (94TH AVENUE S. — 100TH AVENUE SE) PROJECT—ACCEPT AS COMPLETE 2 SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works Director, authorization to accept as complete the S. 248th St. Improvements project and to release the retainage to R.W. Scott Construction upon standard releases from the state and release of any liens. The original contract amount was $723,495.96. The final contract amount was $769,980.59. 3. EXHIBITS: None • 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Director (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION- ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 6G Kent City Council Meeting Date December 9, 2003 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: 2004 CITY ART PLAN 2004-2009 — APPROVE 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Parks Committee, approve the 2004 City Art Plan and 2004-2009 Five-Year Art Plan. The attached Five-Year plan lists projects planned for years 2004-2009. Each year the Kent Arts Commission submits a revised City Art Plan to City Council for review and approval. Please review the attached outline for details. 3. EXHIBITS: 2004 City Art Plan, 2004-2009 Five-Year Art Plan and Ordinance No. 2552 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Staff and Parks Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: S SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 6H CITY OF KENT Parks, Recreation & Community Services Kent Arts Commission 2004 CITY ART PLAN FIVE YEAR CITY ART PLAN, 2004 - 2009 Ordinance 2552 I Approved Visual Arts Committee November 17, 2003 Kent Arts Commission November 25,2003 City Council Sub-Committee. December 9. 2003 City Council December 9. 2003 CITY OF KENT Parks, Recreation & Community Services Kent Arts Commission 2004 CITY ART PLAN PROJECTS carry over 2004 Costs from 2003 Capital Project Art: Three Friends Fishing Hole 10,000 "Agriculture" monumental sculpture by Peter Requiam 30,000 Capital Project Art: Lake Meridian Park/Kent Entry Pt. 30,000 Reclamation Art Projects- Train Corridor(2) 10,000 Design Team Artist: Clark Lake Park 5,000 Portable Collection Purchases 9,000 Carryover from 2003 Downtown Gateway Seat Art(M. Van Slyke) 12,500 Train Comdor Improvements (C dos Remedios) 60,000 Kent Memorial Park Community Art(Andersens) 30,000 Kent Station Downtown Park Art Planner(E. Conner) 25,000 Subtotals $127,500 $94,000 I OTHER EXPENSES Salary & Administration 83,701 Supplies 2,180 Professional Services (Design, Consultant Fees, Maintenance/Repair) 13,886 Subtotal $99,767 2004 TOTAL $193,767 2 KENT ARTS COMMISSION 2004 CITY ART PLAN NARRATIVE Proiect Title. Capital Project Art — Three Friends Fishing Hole Proiect Description- A professional artist would work with park planners to integrate art into the new accessible fishing area. Estimated 2004 Costs- $10,000 Funding Source: City Art Plan Background/Justification: The city has successfully integrated art into other capital improvements and new construction in the past. By doing so, cost savings are realized through combining work in the construction phase. The artist can work with the Parks design team which results in art that is distinct to the site and visually compatible with the other functional elements of the site. In past projects, some artist-made functional elements have been incorporated in seating, railings, gates and other necessary elements. Proiect Title: Monumental Sculpture: "Agriculture" by Peter Requiam Proiect Description- Artist Peter Requiam would fabricate a set of three sculptures of corn stalks proposed for the corner of 84"' Ave S and S. 228"' St , near on/off ramps to SR167. Estimated 2004 Costs: $12,500 Funding Source- City Art Plan Background The arts commission is seeking to place art in visible locations for maximum impact to the visitors and residents of Kent. The intent is to provide icons to distinguish Kent as a unique destination. The use of corn as a symbol of agriculture recalls the days when the fertile Kent Valley produced a variety of crops for commercial and personal consumption The placement of these sculptures is near Carpenito Brothers fresh produce market and the busy ramps of SR167 The sculpture is simple and large enough to see quickly while travelling yet interesting enough to endure Monumental sculptures often act as gateways to a city, this piece would serve a similar purpose to the SR 167 travelers yet be relevant to local people. Proiect Title: Capital Project Art. Lake Meridian Park/ Kent Entry Proiect Description A professional artist will fabricate unique artwork to be placed at Lake Meridian Park, facing the busy SE 272"d Street, to act as a gateway to the city from the East (Covington/Black Diamond) Estimated 2004 Costs: $4,800 Funding Source. City Art Plan Background: Art at this newly landscaped area of Lake Meridian Park/SE 272"d would provide a visible indicator to travelers from the Covington and Black Diamond areas that they have arrived in Kent The artwork would serve to mark this entrance to the city and Lake Meridian Park as unique destinations in Kent. Another successful gateway project is the Kent Banners at SR 516 & West Meeker Street. 3 Proiect Title: Reclamation Art Projects- Train Corridor Art Project Description: Tram Corridor Artist Cheryl dos Remedios would lead community members, youth and sister city community members in a project to create cut panels for two buildings along the BNSF railroad in downtown Kent. Estimated 2004 Costs: $10,000 Funding Source: City Art Plan Backqround: Public artist/planner Tina Hoggatt worked with Kent Arts Commission and local stakeholders to identify areas of the tram corridor that would be enhanced through the instaliation of public art. The corridor is the public face of the community for almost 3,000 daily commuters between Tacoma and Seattle. These proposed RAP projects are part of the Train Corridor Art Master Plan, a plan intended to present an attractive view of Kent as commuters travel through our city. The budget for this project provides for participatory artwork for the exterior walls of two downtown businesses. Proiect Title: Design Team Artist Clark Lake Park Project Description: Artist Ruth Mane Tomlinson will work with Park Planning staff to provide design input into the master plan for Clark Lake Park. The artist would suggest ways to integrate art and incorporate design ideas into the master plan. Estimated 2004 Costs- $5,000 Funding Source City Art Plan Background: An artist in the design phase of a project allows art to be seamlessly integrated into the overall park design. Functional elements can be enhanced and art opportunities recognized at an early stage. Art ideas can be incorporated into the design and construction documents at a substantial cost- savings and artist-made fixtures can take the place of`off-the-shelf" items to create a unique sense of place. Other successful design team projects include Garrison Creek Park art by Elizabeth Conner and Morrill Meadows Park"In the Grove" by T. Ellen Sollod Proiect Title: Portable Collection Purchases Proiect Description: Purchase quality artworks from area artists at the Kent Canterbury Faire Juried Fine Art Exhibit and works that enhance the quality and value of the Portable Art collection. The artworks will be exhibited in publicly accessible areas of the City of Kent facilities. Estimated 2004 Costs: $9,000 Funding Source: City Art Plan Background: The City of Kent Arts Commission has established a collection of portable artwork that includes paintings, prints and other works. The purchase awards at the Canterbury Faire Fine Art Exhibit attract quality area artists to enter. Other portable art is purchased to enhance the art collection and respond to specific needs. The funds allow the City to obtain artwork and to introduce art into the workplace and in public areas where the community does business. This program supports local artists, serves specific needs for special projects and promotes participation in City programs 4 KENT ARTS COMMISSION CITY ART 5 YEAR PLAN 2004-2009 2004 PROJECTS COSTS Capital Project Artwork, Three Friends Fishing Hole 10,000 Monumental Sculpture. Agriculture by Peter Reguiam 30,000 Capital Project: Lake Meridian Park/Kent Entry 30,000 Design Team: Clark Lake Park 5,000 Tram Corridor Improvement, 2 youth murals 10,000 Portable Collection Purchases 9,000 Administration/Maintenance 99,767 Year Total $193,767 2005PROJECTS COSTS Mural Titus Station Park 10,000 Capital Project Artwork, East Hill"X"Park Art 20,000 Capital Project Art: Eagle Creek Neighborhood Park 15,000 Portable Collection Purchases 5,000 Administration/Maintenance 100,000 Year Total $150,000 2006 PROJECTS COSTS Capital Project Artwork,West Hill Neighborhood Park 30,000 Capital Project Artwork, River View Park 15,000 Capital Project Artwork, Town Square Park 40,000 Portable Collection Purchases 5,000 Administration/Maintenance 100,000 Year Total $190,000 2007 PROJECTS COSTS Capital Project Artwork, 132"d Studio/Park Artwork 25,000 Capital Projects 50,000 Portable Collection Purchases 5,000 Administration/Maintenance 100,000 Year Total $180,000 Clark Lake Integrated Artwork, phase 1(R Tomlinson, 200612007) $25,000 272"d Street Neighborhood Park(Community Participation Project) $10,000 Commons Playfields$15,000 2008 PROJECTS COSTS Capital Projects 75,000 Portable Collection Purchases 5,000 Administration/Maintenance 101,000 Year Total $181,000 Clark Lake Integrated Artwork phase 11, $25,000 Willis Gateway- 50,000 +possible other CIP funds 2009 PROJECTS COSTS Capital Projects 95,000 Portable Art Collection Purchases 10,000 Administration/Maintenance 102,000 Year Total 207,000 Gateways, Park Integrated Art, Capital Project Integrated Art Ordinance No . 2552 ["Beginning July 1 , 1998"] (Amending or Repealing Ordinances) Sec. 2.34.030 (now: 4.02.030) Amended by Ord. 3428 I i ORDINANCE NO. CRSSoZ i f/ Gl�� AN ORDINANCE of the City of Kent, )}C�p Washington relating to public art; establishing �` a City Art Program, directing establishment of guidelines and procedures for administration of �h �(,• the City Art Program; establishing a City Art f� Fund; adding a new Chapter 2.35 Kent City Code in conjunction therewith; amending p�fW Chapter 2.34 KCC concerning the City of Kent Arts Commission (Sections 1 - 6, Ordinance 1944); repealing KCC 3.14.368, the Arts Commission Fund (Section 7, Ordinance 1944) . l WHEREAS, the aesthetic nature and charm of the City of I Kent shall be enhanced, and the citizens of the City of Kent shall hold and enjoy works of art for the public environment and welfare; and I WHEREAS, the City intends to expand the opportunity for Kent residents to experience art in public places and to create a more visually pleasing and humane environment; and WHEREAS, it is appropriate to establish a means whereby the City of Kent Arts Commission shall maintain an orderly acquisition of art by the City of Kent; and i I WHEREAS, there shall be a City Art Program which shall consist of Guidelines, Procedures and an Art Plan; NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. A new Chapter 2.35 is added to the Kent City Code, as follows: CITY ART PROGRAM 2.35 .010. ART FUND CREATED. There is hereby established a City Art Fund. Monies for the Fund shall be received from: A A. ANNUAL BUDGET. Two (2) dollars per budget year I for each City resident, based upon population data certified by II I �1 the State of Washington Office of Financial Management. Budgeted �I but unspent funds shall be maintained in the Art Fund, and carried forward at the end of each budget year. B. GIFTS, DONATIONS AND GRANTS. Private or public gifts, endowments, donations, bequests or other grants. C. OTHER. Such other sources as may be available. D. INTEREST FROM THE CITY ART FUND. 2.35.020. FUND USE - ART PROGRAM - COLLECTION. A. Inclusions - The City Art Fund may be used for all costs for works of art, administrative costs of the City Art Program, and all costs of installation and maintenance. B. The City of Kent Arts Commission and Staff shall recommend the amount to be made available for the purchase of art, in consultation with City staff. The designation of projects and sites, selection, contracting, purchase, commissioning, review of design, execution and placement, acceptance, maintenance, sale, exchange, or disposition of work of art shall be recommended by the Kent Arts Commission and Staff, for approval by the City Council, in accordance with the City Art Program Guidelines. C. All works of art purchased and commissioned under the City Art Program shall become a part of a City Art Collection. The City Art Collection shall be developed, administered and operated by the Kent Arts Commission with cooperation and support of the Kent Parks Department Staff. D. The works of art may be placed on public lands, integrated with or attached to a public building or structure, detached within or outside a public building or structure, or part of a portable collection or exhibit. - 2 - i I E. Nothing in this Chapter shall limit the amount of money the City of Kent may expend for art. 2.35 .030. GENERAL PROCEDURES. A. Upon consultation with the City of Kent Arts Commission, Guidelines and Procedures shall be prepared by Staff for the implementation of the Arts Program. Such Guidelines and Procedures shall be reviewed by the City of Kent Arts Commission and Staff annually, and recommendations shall be made to the City Council for approval. B. A City Art Plan including a schedule and budget for all City Art Program pro3ects shall be prepared and updated annually by the City of Kent Arts Commission and Staff. The City Art Plan shall be reviewed and approved annually by the City Council. Section 2. Chapter 2.34 KCC (Ordinance 1944, Sections 1 - 7) is amended as follows: KENT ARTS COMMISSION 2.34.0(-f4})10. ARTS COMMISSION CREATED. There is hereby created ((a * ^ tre--be kttewrr es-)) the Kent Arts Commission. i i 2.34.0(04)20. PURPOSE. The City of Kent Arts Commission and Staff may, alone or in cooperation with any other private, civic or public body of any City, county or the State of Washington, initiate, sponsor or conduct programs calculated to further public awareness of and interest in the visual and performing arts. 2.34.( f3s)-)O30. MEMBERSHIP - TERM. The membership of the City of Kent Arts Commission shall be twelve members to be appointed by the Mayor with the approval of the City Council. Of the first twelve members appointed, six shall be appointed for two years and six shall be appointed for four years, with the II - 3 I� respective terms of each initial appointee to be determined by lot. Subsequent appointments shall be for a period of four years or for the unexpired balance of the term for which appointed, whichever is the lesser period. In addition to the twelve appointed members, one member of the City Council shall be designated by the president of the Council to serve as an ex officio member of the City of Kent Arts Commission for a term of one year. 2.34.( (3fr"))04D. OFFICERS - MONTHLY MEETINGS. The City of Kent Arts Commission shall elect its officers, including a chairman, vice chairman, and such officers as it may deem necessary. Such persons shall occupy their respective offices for a period of one year. The City of Kent Arts Commission shall hold regular public meetings at least monthly. 2 .34(F2S-))050. RULES - PUBLIC RECORD. The City of Kent Arts Commission shall adopt rules for transaction of business and shall keep written minutes of its proceedings which minutes shall be a public record. 2.34.(�2 )060. BUDGET. The City of Kent Arts Commission and Staff shall each year submit to the City Administrator and City Council for approval a proposed budget for the following year in the manner provided by law for preparation iand submission of budgets by appointive officials. Section 3. KCC 3.14.36E (Ordinance 1944, Section 7) is hereby repealed: entitled Gity c Kenk Arts Administrator and Gity Council Shall i L 4 - the sueeeeding yea- , ) Section 4. 1986 Budget - Funding. The funding provided for in KCC 2 .35.010y. shall first take effect and be in force for I the 1986 City of Kent Budget. Section 5. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force five (5) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by I pw. r'SABEL HOGAN, MAY02 ATTEST: . . 2`2z& BETTY AY, DEFU CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO/FOORM- P. STEPHEN DIJULIO, CITY ATTORNEY PASSED the /e5 day of C 1 1985. APPROVED the r1__day of 4 t 1965. PUBLISHED the �i day of 1 1985. T! I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No. a6 5a , passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, I Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the City of Kent as hereon indicated. I` ,�� I� GZGcL ��z<� (SEAL) 1 BETTY GKAY. DEPU'LT CITY CLER I 2540-110 i 5 - . Kent City Council Meeting Date December 9, 2003 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: KING COUNTY ARTIST-IN-SCHOOL PROJECT GRANT— ACCEPT AND AMEND BUDGET 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by Parks Committee, accept the $1,500.00 Cultural Development Authority of King County grant for the Amst-m- School Project and amend the Kent Arts Commission budget. A grant was received from the Cultural Development Authority of King County for an artist-in-schools program at Pine Tree Elementary. This collaboration with the Kent School District will bring a local artist into the school to integrate curriculum-based art into the classroom. Third grade students, teachers and parent volunteers will work with artist Meredith Doll in learning an arts and culture program. 3. EXHIBITS: King County contract 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Staff and Parks Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES X 6. EXPENDITURE REOUIRED: Revenue of$1,500.00 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Grant funds from the Cultural Development Authority of King County 7 CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 6I Agreement No 103345 Contractor's Federal Taxpayer ID No Contractor City of Kent - Arts Commission Project Title Artist in School Program Contract Amount $ 1,500 00 Fund Source. CP — Cultural Arts Education Contract Period From 09/01/03 To 06/30/04 AGENCY SERVICES CONTRACT 2003 THIS CONTRACT is entered into by the CULTURAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF KING COUNTY (the "CDA"), whose address is 506 Second Avenue, Ste 200, Seattle, WA 98104-2307 and telephone number is (206) 296-7580 and the City of Kent - Arts Commission (the "Contractor"), whose address is 220 Fourth Avenue South, Kent WA 98032 and telephone number is (253) 856-5058 Contractor is an art, cultural or historical organization or specialist qualified to receive funds pursuant to King County Code Sections 2.48 and 4 42 and RCW 67 28 180 and as hereinafter may be amended The CDA Board approved providing funds for this project by Motion No. 2003-22 The CDA desires to provide funds with which the Contractor shall render certain services to King County citizens Such services are for the benefit of art museums, cultural museums, heritage museums, the arts, i and/or the performing arts and are consistant with those defined in RCW 67 28 180 ("Public Benefit Services") The CDA is organized pursuant to King County Ordinance 14482 and RCW 35 21 730, et seg RCW 35 21 750 provides as follows "[All] liabilities incurred by such public corporation, commission, or authority shall be satisfied exclusively from the assets and properties of such public corporation, commission or authority and no creditor or other person shall have any right of action against the city, town, or county creating such corporation, commission, or authority on account of any debts, obligations, or liabilities of such public corporation, commission, or authority " The legislative authority of the CDA has found and declared that providing funds to Contractor to reimburse Project costs in consideration of services provided hereunder constitutes a public purpose with the meaning of Article VI I, Section 1 of the Washington State Constitution for which public funds may properly be expended or advanced NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of payments, covenants, and agreements hereinafter mentioned, to be made and performed by the parties hereto, the parties covenant and do mutually agree as follows. AG SVC 03 Page 1 of I. SCOPE OF SERVICES A The Contractor shall provide services and comply with the requirements set forth hereinafter an in the following attached exhibits which are incorporated herein by reference ® Specific Scope of Services & Reimbursement Schedule Attached hereto as Exhibit A ® Protect Proposal and Budget Attached hereto as Exhibit B ® Insurance Requirements Attached hereto as Exhibit C ❑ Personnel Inventory (K C.0 12.16 060A) (In combination with Attached hereto as Exhibit D other agreements, in excess of$25,000 in a calendar ear ❑ Affidavit and Certificate of Compliance (K C.0 12.16 060B) Attached hereto as Exhibit E for A reements in excess of$25,000 ❑ Disability Assurance of Compliance/Section 504 Attached hereto as Exhibit I F KCC 12.16.060D ORGANIZATIONS ONLY] B. Purchase of Services. Funds awarded under this Agreement shall be used solely to reimburse the Contractor for expenses incurred expressly and solely in accordance with the Protect Proposal and Budget and/or the Specific Scope of Services attached. Any amendment or modification to the Project Proposal and Budget or the Specific Scope of Services and Payment Schedule must be approved in writing by the CDA The work described generally by the Protect Proposal and Budget and more specifically by the Specific Scope of Services shall hereinafter be referred to as the "Project". C. In addition to performing the Protect, Contractor shall provide any Public Benefit Provisions that may be specified in the Specific Scope of Services attached. D. The Contractor agrees to acknowledge the CDA as a source of support for the Project in prominently located permanent signage utilizing the following logo: cultura development authority King County Hotel/ Motel Tax Fund E The Contractor agrees to notify the CDA in advance of any public Project activities, including but not limited to ground breaking events, dedications, and other public programs 11. DURATION OF CONTRACT This Agreement shall commence on September 15', 2003 and shall terminate on June 301h, 2004. This Agreement, however, may be terminated earlier as provided in Section IV hereof III. COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT A. The CDA shall reimburse the Contractor for its actual and authorized expenditures incurred in satisfactorily completing the Specific Scope of Services attached and otherwise fulfilling all requirements specified in this contract in an aggregate amount not to exceed $1,500 00. AG SVC 03 Page 2 of B Contractor may apply to the CDA for reimbursement upon completion of specified phases as detailed in the Specific Scope of Services and Reimbursement Schedule attached to this contract C. Contractor shall submit an invoice and all accompanying reports in the forms attached hereto as "EXHIBITS", not more than 30 days after the completion of each specified phase identified in the Specific Scope of Services and Reimbursement Schedule The CDA will initiate authorization for payment after approval of corrected invoices and reports The CDA shall make payment to the Agency not more than 60 days after the appropriate invoice is received D Contractor shall submit its final invoice and all outstanding reports within 30 days of the date this Agreement terminates If the Agency's final invoice and reports are not submitted by the day specified in this subsection, the CDA will be relieved of all liability for payment to the Agency of the amounts set forth in said invoice or any subsequent invoice E Accompanying the final invoice for the project, the Contractor shall also submit 1 A protect evaluation report upon the form provided by CDA 2 If CDA requests, at least two images (prints, slides, or digital images accompanied by a high-quality print-out) of publishable quality for use by the CDA to publicize its funding programs Photos shall have credits, caption information, and permission to publish F If the Contractor fads to comply with any terms or conditions of this contract or to provide in any manner the work or services agreed to herein, the CDA may withhold any payment to the Contractor until the CDA is satisfied that corrective action, as specified by the CDA, has been completed This right is in addition to and not in lieu of the CDA right to terminate this contract as provided in Section IV, any other rights of CDA under this Agreement and any other right or remedy available to CDA at law or in equity IV. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT A If, through any cause, the Contractor shall fail to fulfill in a timely and proper manner its obligations under this Agreement or if the Contractor shall violate any of its covenants, agreements or stipulations of this Agreement, the CDA may terminate this Agreement and withhold the remaining allocation Prior to so terminating this Agreement, CDA shall submit written notice to the Contractor describing such default or violation The CDA shall not so terminate this Agreement if CDA determines that Contractor has, within twenty (20) days of the date of such notice, fully corrected such default or violation V. MAINTENANCE OF RECORDS A. The Contractor shall maintain accounts and records, including personnel, property, financial, and programmatic records and other such records as may be deemed necessary by the CDA to ensure proper accounting for all contract funds and compliance with this Agreement All such records shall sufficiently and properly reflect all direct and indirect costs of any nature expended and services provided in the performance of this Agreement B. These records shall be maintained for a period of six (6) years after termination of this Agreement unless a longer retention period is required by law AG SVC 03 Page 3 of 7 VI. AUDITS AND EVALUATIONS A The records and documents with respect to all matters covered by this Agreement shall be 110 subject at all times to inspection, review or audit by the CDA and/or federal/state officials so authorized by law during the performance of this Agreement and six (6) years after termination hereof B The Contractor shall provide right of access to its facilities, including by any subcontractor to the CDA, the King County, state and/or federal agencies or officials at all reasonable times in order to monitor and evaluate the services provided under this Agreement. The CDA will give advance notice to the Contractor in the case of fiscal audits to be conducted by the CDA. C. The Contractor agrees to cooperate with the CDA in the evaluation of the Contractor's performance under this contract and to make available all information reasonably required by any such evaluation process The results and records of said evaluations shall be maintained and disclosed in accordance with RCW Chapter 42.17 (Public Records Act). Vil. PROPRIETARY RIGHTS If any patentable or copyrightable material or article should result from the Project, all rights accruing from such material or article shall be the sole property of Contractor Contractor agrees to and does hereby grant to the CDA, an irrevocable, nonexclusive, and royalty-free license to use, according to law, any material or article and use any method that may be developed as part of the work under this Agreement The foregoing license shall not apply to existing training materials, consulting aids, checklists, and other materials and documents of Contractor which are modified for use in the performance of this Agreement Vill. FUTURE SUPPORT CDA makes no commitment to support the services contracted for herein nor guarantee regarding the success of the services and assumes no obligation for future support of the Project except as expressly set forth in this Agreement IX. HOLD HARMLESS AND INDEMNIFICATION A In providing services under this Agreement, the Contractor is an independent contractor, and shall determine the means of accomplishing the results contemplated by this Agreement Neither the Contractor nor its officers, agents or employees are employees of the CDA for any purpose The Contractor shall comply with all applicable federal and state laws and regulations regarding employment, minimum wages and hours, and discrimination in employment The Contractor is responsible for determining the compensation of its employees, for payment of such compensation, and for all federal and/or state tax, industrial insurance, and Social Security liability that may result from the performance of and compensation for these services. The Contractor and its officers, agents, and employees shall make no claim of career service or civil service rights which may accrue to a CDA employee under state or local law The CDA assumes no responsibility for the payment of any compensation, wages, benefits, or taxes by, or on behalf of the Contractor, its employees and/or others by reason of this Agreement The Contractor shall protect, defend, indemnify and save harmless the CDA and its officers, agents, and employees from and against any and all claims, costs, and/or losses whatsoever occurring or resulting from (1)the Contractor's failure to pay any such compensation, wages, benefits, or taxes, (2) the supplying to the Contractor of work, services, materials, or supplies by Contractor employees or other suppliers in connection with or support of the performance of this Agreement The Contractor shall also defend, indemnify, and save harmless the CDA, and its officers, agents, and employees, from and against any and* all claims made by Contractor's employees arising from their employment with Contractor AG S VC 03 Page 4 of 7 B To the full extent provided by applicable law, the Contractor shall protect, defend, indemnify, and save harmless the CDA its officers, employees, and agents from any and all costs, claims, judgments, and/or awards of damages, arising out of or in any way resulting from the acts or omissions of the Contractor, its officers, employees, and/or agents, except to the extent resulting from the CDA's sole negligence If this Agreement is a "a covenant, promise, agreement or understanding in, or in connection with or collateral to, a contract or agreement relative to the construction, alteration, repair, addition to, subtraction from, improvement to, or maintenance of, any budding, highway, road, railroad, excavation, or other structure, project, development, or improvement attached to real estate"within the meaning of RCW 4 24.225, the Contractor shall so protect, defend, indemnify, and save harmless the CDA its officers, employees, and agents only to the extent of the Contractor's, its officers', employees', and/or agents' negligence The Contractor agrees that its obligations under this subparagraph extend to any claim, demand, and/or cause of action brought by or on behalf of any employees, or agents. For the purpose, the Contractor, by mutual negotiation, hereby waives, as respects the CDA only, any immunity that would otherwise be available against such claims under the Industrial Insurance provisions of Title 51 RCW In the event the CDA incurs any judgment, award and/or cost arising there from including attorney's fees to enforce the provisions of this article, all such fees, expenses, and costs shall be recoverable from the Contractor Claims shall include, but are not limited to, assertions that the use or transfer of any software, book, document, report, film, tape or sound reproduction or material of any kind, delivered hereunder, constitutes an infringement of any copyright, patent, trademark, trade name, and/or otherwise results in unfair trade practice. X. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS The Contractor shall procure and maintain for the duration of this Agreement insurance as described on the Exhibit labeled as Insurance Requirements attached here to XI. CONFLICT OF INTEREST Chapter 42 23 RCW (Code Of Ethics For Municipal Officers--Contract Interests) is incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein and the Contractor agrees to abide by all the conditions of said Chapter Failure by the Contractor to comply with any requirements of such Chapter shall be a material breach of contract In addition, Contractor represents, warrants and covenants that no officer, employee, or agent of the CDA who exercises any functions or responsibilities in connection with the planning and implementation of the Specific Scope of Contract Services funded herein, has or shall have any beneficial interest, directly or indirectly, in this contract The Contractor further represents, warrants and covenants neither it nor any other person beneficially interested in this Agreement has offered to give or given any such officer, employee, or agent of the CDA, directly or indirectly, any compensation, gratuity or reward in connection with this Agreement The Contractor shall take all appropriate steps to assure compliance with this provision AG SVC 03 Page 5 of 7 XII. NONDISCRIMINATION During the performance of this Agreement, Contractor shall comply with state, federal and local legislation requiring nondiscrimination in employment and the provision of services to the public, including, but not limited to Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; chapter 49.60 RCW (the Washington state law against discrimination), K C C chapter 12.16 regarding discrimination and affirmative action in employment by contractors, subcontractors and vendors; K.0 C. chapter 12 17 prohibiting discrimination in contracting; K C C. chapter 12 18 requiring fair employment practices, K.0 C chapter and 12 22 prohibiting discrimination in places of public accommodation. The Contractor shall maintain, until 12 months after completion of all work under this contract, all written quotes, bids, estimates or proposals submitted to the Contractor by all businesses seeking to participate in this Agreement. The Contractor shall make such documents available to the CDA for inspection and copying upon request. X111. NOTICES Whenever this Agreement provides for notice to be provided by one party to another, such notice shall be in writing and directed to the chief executive officer of Contractor and the Executive Director of the CDA at the addresses first written above. Any time within which a party must take some action shall be computed from the date that the notice is received by said party XIV.GENERAL PROVISIONS No modification or amendment to this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and signed by the parties hereto. Proposed changes which are mutually agreed upon shall be incorporated by written amendments to this Agreement The CDA's failure to insist upon the strict performance of any provision of this Agreement or to exercise any right based upon a breach thereof or the acceptance of any performance during such breach, shall not constitute a waiver of any right under this Agreement In the event any term or condition of this Agreement or application thereof to any person or circumstances is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other terms, conditions, or applications of this Agreement which can be given effect without the invalid term, condition, or application To this end, the terms and conditions of this Agreement are declared severable The parties agree that this Agreement is the complete expression of the terms hereto and any oral or written representations or understandings not incorporated herein are excluded Both parties recognize that time is of the essence in the performance of the provisions of this Agreement XV. ATTORNEYS' FEES; EXPENSES Contractor agrees to pay upon demand all of CDA's costs and expenses, including attorneys' fees and CDA's legal expenses, incurred in connection with the enforcement of this Agreement CDA may pay someone else to help enforce this Agreement, and Contractor shall pay the costs and expenses of such enforcement Costs and expenses include CDA's attorneys' fees and legal expenses whether or not there is a lawsuit, including attorneys' fees and legal expenses for bankruptcy proceedings (and including efforts to modify or vacate any automatic stay or injunction), appeals, and any anticipated post-judgment collection services. Contractor also shall pay all court costs and such additional fees as may be directed by the court 0 AG SVC 03 Page 6 of 7 XVI. SURVIVAL The terms and conditions of Sections III, V, VI, VII, VIII, IX, XI, XII, XIII, XIV and XV shall survive the termination of this Agreement and shall be continuing obligations of the parties CDA: CONTRACTOR: CDA Executive Director Signature Date Name (Please type or print) Title (Please type or print) Date AG SVC 03 Page 7 of EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICE Kent Arts Commission and the Cultural Development Authority of King County mutually agree that the following services be provided in accordance with the application submitted to and approved by the Board of the Cultural Development Authority of King County Partial support for Artist to School Program, in collaboration with Pine Tree Elementary in the Kent School District This collaboration will bring local artists into the school to integrate cumculum-based art in the classroom There will be an estimated3975 students involved in this project,from the 3rd andO gradep. Funds will be used to pay artist Meredith Doll to work with school administration, teachers and the Kent Arts Commission in planning and implementing a curriculum-based art program and to lead art projects in the classrooms Amount S1500 For artist fees and direct project expenses NOTIFICATION OF EVENTS AND ACTIVITIES Project directors are requested to notify the Cultural Development Authority of King County in advance of project activities including classes, workshops, exhibitions or performances PUBLICITYIPROMOTION POLICY Prominent acknowledgment of the Cultural Development Authority of King County and Hotel/Motel Tax Revenues is required of all recipients for use in all publicity and promotional materials, including,but not limited to brochures,press releases, programs,posters,public service announcements, flyers and advertisements The following logo and/or language is recommended cultura deve opment authority King County Hotel/ Motel Tax Fund Final payment will not be made until acknowledgment is submitted on printed material Kent City Council Meeting Date December 9, 2003 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: REIMBURSEMENT FOR STREET TREE REPLACEMENT— ACCEPT AND AMEND BUDGET 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by Parks Committee, accept $200.00 from Urban Hardwoods for reimbursement of recycled street trees and amend the Street Tree Replacement budget. Street trees in the Kent downtown corridor are buckling the sidewalks and curbs, causing visibility issues, and often interfering with overhead power lines. Staff is in the process of removing these trees. The tree trunks are salvaged and sold to tree reclamation companies to be made into furniture or specialty products. Compensation for the trees is used to purchase a replacement street tree species more suitable for each site. This public/private partnership benefits the Kent community by providing a stable source of funds to purchase replacement street trees, and by recycling the removed trees into a useable resource (furniture). 3. EXHIBITS: copy of check/revenue report 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Staff and Parks Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES X 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: Revenue of$200.00 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Urban Hardwoods ' 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION- Council Agenda Item No. W R55GA006 City of Kent 11/3/2003 Page 1 Journal Entry/Budget Change Doc#: 18457 Ledger Type: AA Journal Entry Doc Type: JR Batch#. 33253 Explanation: PP&D Deposit 9217 Street Tree G/L Date: 11/3/2003 Automatic Reversal? No Created by: JBROOM Last Changed by: JBROO Line# Business Unit Object Subsidiary Subledger Debit Amount Credit AmountAccount Explanation Reference 10 P20044 56910 200 00- Street Tree Replacement 20 1 11110 0010 20000 Street Tree Replacement Journal Entry Totals: 20000 200 00- • - I .rice v<-wed by CURRENCY: DATE �� COIN: � n�® BRANCH FOOD COUPONS: CHECKS:-- �•n Bag# C 6= 9'2 BK CRD/SALES DRAFTS: Remove Receipt tear strip before sealing. TOTAL:$—� i URBAN HARDWOODS JIM NEWSOM 1801 127 S RIVER ST SEATTLE,WA 98108 1"0a/1250 PAY TO THE onrE ORDER OF Sys UO�LIr1 f�SJ�Bf 1-80D-87143ANK(2265) y �z �e wgzw }{ ro0. U O W 2 50080 3 91: 2 5 10 10 17 7 311 wLL�< 0 O1 a=<OZ f 1 Np'-U 1 o nr,quHo xmx ¢F 1 i 4 YJ _ II F wU _�2J 1 3 WL) x w�4 Mwoo r o : Na. G m aw�� Z a mom Zi- a J� > rn N aN WW ZW29 • 'd U Q Y O-i d W w 2 U U i n W J W LL Z>i- W w 0 ¢ = H U� .SF ZOLLZ O Q Y.W' iL Q Yi w U U FU N n < N b A m O i 0 N - n U. m IN H N H O , ULLOa W G Z (Mbank. 19-1011250 _ Q 24-Hour Banking U a a. ITEMS 8006733555 TOTAL ITEMS 11'009a 100000u■ - 1: 5t, L 21003 21: 1, 535007L5333u• Kent City Council Meeting Date December 9, 2003 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: 2003 LTGO COUNCILMANIC BONDS ORDINANCE— ADOPT 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Adoption of Ordinance No. the 2003 LTGO Councilmanic Bond ordinance. The 2003 LTGO Councilmanic Bond issue totals approximately $7,518,000 and contains three items: (A) Taxable Bonds for $1,878,000; (B) Tax Exempt Bonds for S3,526,000; and (C) Refunding 1992 Bonds for $2,114,000. 3. EXHIBITS: Memo from Finance Director, Bank of America proposal, financial analysis and bond ordinance 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Operations Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: S SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 6K FINANCE May Miller, Director Phone 253-856-5260 K E N T Fax 253-856-6255 7WASHINGTON Address 220 Fourth Avenue S Kent,WA 98032-5895 DATE: November 6, 2003 TO: Mayor White and Kent City Council (�(� FROM: May Miller, Finance Director THROUGH. Mike Martin SUBJECT: 2003 LTGO Councilmanic Bonds MOTION. I move to recommend the adoption of 2003 (LTGO) Councilmanic Bond Ordinance No. for approximately $7,518,000, including issuance costs. SUMMARY: The 2003 LTGO Councilmanic Bond issue totals approximately $7.518.000 and contains three items: A Taxable Bonds for $1,878,000 B Tax Exempt Bonds for $3,526,000 C. Refunding 1992 Bonds for$2,114,000 BUDGET IMPACT: Debt service on A and B w ill be included in the 2004 budget Savings on C will be included in 2004 through 2007 budgets BACKGROUND: A Taxable Bonds The taxable LTGO bonds total $1,878.000 and include $1.200,000 for loan repayment to the Water Fund for land purchase for the Kent Station project The $1.200.000 is the final payment of the original $3,900,000 Water Fund loan to the Kent Station project and is due 1/14/2004 A second Water Fund loan remains outstanding with a 2006 due date Approximately$662,389 of bond proceeds will refinance the capital improvement loan on the downtown Saturday Market building currently payable to U S Bank at 7 125% interest rate. The refinance rate of estimated 5 45% will provide long-term financing for the project and approximately $39,000 of net present value savings The taxable bonds carry a 15 year term at an approximate 5 45%interest rate and can be called at any time without penalty as long as future interest rates are no higher than today. If rates are lower, there would be a make-whole prepayment fee Kent Council Operations Committee Councilmanic Bonds-LTGO for 2003 Revised 12/1/03 B. Tax Exempt Bonds The $3,526,000 tax exempt bonds will fund the second issuance of bonds for the city's Tech II plan. The plan's intent to bond was approved by Council on 5/21/2002. The technology bonds primarily fund public safety systems for the jail and records management systems as well as providing officer reporting, crime analysis, mug shot tools, and other technology projects The tax exempt bonds also include some funds for technology servers, security upgrades, and productivity software. The planned bond amount was reduced from $4,000,000 to $3,500.000 due to cost savings. The tax exempt technology bonds will be for ten years at approximately 3.55% interest C Refunding 1992 Bonds The 1992 LTGO Refunding Bonds of approximately $2,114,000 will provide net savings of approximately $127,000 This will be achieved by refinancing callable bonds maturing in 2004- 2007 The refinancing rate of approximately 2 3% will show significant savings over the current 6.351%-6.5% interest with approximately $117,000 of the savings in 2004 The bonds were originally issued to refund portions of 1985, 1986, and 1987 bond issues and were used for Golf Open Space, Corrections Facility, Senior Center, Library and Street capital projects Bond closing is expected on December 18, 2003. Kent Council Operations Committee Councilmanic Bonds-LTGO for 2003 Revised 12/1/03 BankofAmerica November 7, 2003 Ms May Miller Finance Director City of Kent 2204t" Avenue South Kent, WA 98032 Re $1,878,000 LTGO Bond Series 2003A(Taxable) Dear May Attached is a proposal for Bank of America to provide a taxable municipal term loan to the City of Kent Please call either me at 503-275-1869, or Alex Johnston at 206-358-8938, to discuss any questions or comments you may have regarding the proposal We look forward to working with you on this transaction Very truly yours, BANKOF AMERICA, N A - Douglas B Bowlsby Senior Vice President Cc Alex Johnston, Bank of America David Trageser, Banc of America Securities Distribution List i SUMMARY OF TERMS AND CONDITIONS City of Kent,WA November 7,2003 (For Discussion Purposes Only) BORROWER: City of Kent, WA("City") LENDER- Bank of America, N A ("Bank of America") CREDIT FACILITY: Taxable limited tax general obligation bond in the form of a municipal term loan in the amount of$1,878,000, or as negotiated (the"Credit Facility") PURPOSE Refinance a portion of the Kent Station Project, finance PDA Saturday Market Note redemption, and finance costs of issuance INTEREST RATE: Indicative rate of 5 45% fixed (taxable), calculated on a 30/360-day basis Final pricing to be set up to one month prior to closing, as mutually agreed by City and Bank of America FEES AND EXPENSES. The City will pay the Bank's legal review fee of$500 REPAYMENTIMATURITY. Interest on the Credit Facility shall be paid semi-annually on June 1 and December 1 of each year, commencing June 1, 2004 Principal on the Credit Facility shall be repaid annually on December 1 of each year, commencing December 1, 2004, based on full fifteen-year amortization and approximately equal annual debt service Tentative principal repayment schedule is as follows Payment Date Principal Amount 12/01/04 $81,000 00 12/01/05 $89,000 00 12/01/06 $94,000 00 12/01/07 $99,000 00 12/01/08 $104,000 00 12/01/09 $110,000 00 12/01110 $116,000 00 12/01/11 $122,000 00 12/01/12 $129,000 00 12/01/13 $136,000 00 12/01/14 $143,000 00 12/01/15 $151,000 00 12/01/16 $159,000 00 12/01/17 $168,000 00 12/01/18 $177,000 00 SECURITY: The Credit Facility will be a limited tax general obligation of the City 2 PREPAYMENTS: If principal amounts prepaid, whether by voluntary prepayment or otherwise, the prepayment shall be accompanied by a prepayment fee as set forth in the attached Exhibit A REPRESENTATIONS Usual and customary for transactions of this type, to include In addition, AND WARRANTIES Borrower to provide a legal opinion of nationally recognized bond counsel, in form and substance acceptable to Bank and its legal counsel, that (i) the ff resolution and all documents related to the Credit Facility have been properly adopted, authorized and executed, and (n) the resolution and all documents related to the Credit Facility constitute a legally binding obligation of the Borrower, payable from the security and enforceable according to their terms (subject to standard exceptions) Bank of America is prepared to accept the opinion of Foster Pepper& Shefelman, PLLC as Note Counsel for Borrower REPORTING Financial Information from Borrower Borrower to provide financial REQUIREMENTS* information and statements in form and content acceptable to Bank of America indicated below • Upon receipt, the Borrower's annual State Audit Report • Within 270 days of the Borrower's fiscal year end, the Borrower's audited annual financial statements Within 45 days of adoption, the Borrower's preliminary annual budget and i budget adoption ordinance EVENTS OF DEFAULT: Usual and customary in transactions of this type, to include without limitation (i) nonpayment of principal, interest, fees or other amounts, (ii) violation of covenants, (ni) inaccuracy of representations and warranties, pv) bankruptcy and other insolvency events, (vi) creditor or forfeiture proceedings, and (vn) actual or asserted invalidity of any loan documentation or security interests FOR DISCUSSION This Summary of Terms and Conditions does not constitute a PURPOSES commitment to lend by Bank of America or any of its affiliates and is ONLY: presented for discussion purposes only. The actual terms and conditions upon which Bank of America may extend credit to Borrower is subject to satisfactory completion of due diligence, necessary credit approval and such other terms and conditions as determined by Bank of America, in its sole discretion ORAL AGREEMENTS OR ORAL COMMITMENTS TO LOAN MONEY, TO EXTEND CREDIT, OR TO FORBEAR FROM ENFORCING REPAYMENT OF A, DEBT ARE NOT ENFORCEABLE UNDER WASHINGTON LAW 3 Prepayment Fee—Breakfunding (Initial Cost of Funds Rate/Treasury Rate) The Prepayment Fee shall be the sum of fees calculated separately for each Prepaid Installment, as follows (1) Determine the amount of interest which would have accrued each month for the Prepaid Installment, { had it remained outstanding until the applicable Original Payment Date at the Initial Cost of Funds Rate applicable to the Prepaid Installment, (2) Subtract from each monthly interest amount determined in (1)above, the amount of interest that would accrue for that Prepaid Installment if it were reinvested from the date of prepayment through the Original Payment Date, at the Treasury Rate, (3) If(1)above, minus(2)above, for the Prepaid Installment is greater than zero, discount the monthly difference to the date of prepayment by the Treasury Rate The sum of the discounted monthly differences is the prepayment fee for that Prepaid Installment, plus (4) An amount equal to all costs and expenses (subject to a cap of$200) Bank reasonably expects to incur in liquidation and reinvestment of such prepaid funds For purposes of this Section, the capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined have the following meanings (1) "Initial Cost of Funds Rate" means the fixed interest rate of interest per annum representing Borrower's cost of purchasing funds, or the cost of purchasing and exchanging funds through swaps or other derivative products, for an amount and under terms reflecting the characteristics of the Prepaid Installment from the date • the Bond shall begin to bear interest through the Maturity Date I (2) "Original Payment Dates" means the dates on which principal of the Bond would have been paid if there had been no prepayment If a portion of the principal would have been paid later than the end of the interest period in effect at the time of prepayment, then the Original Payment Date for that portion shall be the last day of the Interest Period (3) "Prepaid Installment" means the portion of the prepaid principal of the Bond that would have been paid on a single Original Payment Date (4) Treasury Rate" means the interest rate yield for U S Government Treasury Securities that the Bank determines could be obtained by reinvesting a specified Prepaid Installment in such securities from the date of prepayment through the Original Payment Date Bank may adjust the Treasury Rate and Initial Cost of Funds Rate to reflect the difference between the terms of such investments and the terms of the Bond, such as compounding, accrual basis, or other costs and terms Each of the rates is Bank's estimate only, and Bank is under no obligation to actually reinvest any prepayment The rates shall be based on information from either the Telerate or Reuters information services,The Wall Street Journal, or other information sources the Bank deems appropriate 4 Bankof America w November 7, 2003 Ms May Miller Finance Director City of Kent 220 4'h Avenue South Kent, WA 98032 Re $3,526,000 LTGO Bond, Series 2003E (Tax- Exempt, Bank Qualified) Dear May Attached is a proposal for Bank of America to provide a tax-exempt municipal term loan to the City of Kent Please call either me at 503-275-1869, or Alex Johnston at 206-358-8938, to discuss any questions or comments you may have regarding the proposal We look forward to working with you on this transaction Very truly yours, BANK OF AMERICA, N A -% Douglas B Bowlsby Senior Vice President Cc Alex Johnston, Bank of America David Trageser, Banc of America Securities Distribution List i SUMMARY OF TERMS AND CONDITIONS City of Kent,WA November 7,2003 (For Discussion Purposes Only) BORROWER: City of Kent, WA("City") LENDER: Bank of America, N A ("Bank of America") CREDIT FACILITY: Tax-exempt limited tax general obligation bond in the form of a municipal term loan in the amount of$3,526,000, or as negotiated (the"Credit Facility") PURPOSE Finance capital expenditures for technology improvements and finance costs of issuance INTEREST RATE: Indicative rate of 3 55% fixed (tax-exempt, bank qualrfled), calculated on a 30/360-day basis Final pricing to be set up to one month prior to closing, as mutually agreed by City and Bank of America FEES AND EXPENSES: The City will pay the Banks legal review fee of$500 REPAYMENT/MATURITY: Interest on the Credit Facility shall be paid on February 1, 2005, and then semi- annually on June 1 and December 1 of each year, commencing June 1, 2005 Principal on the Credit Facility shall be repaid annually on December 1 of each year, commencing December 1, 2005, based on full nine-year amortization and approximately equal annual debt service Tentative principal repayment schedule is as follows PaVment Date Principal Amount 12/01/05 $235,000 00 12/01/06 $363,000 00 12/01/07 $376,000 00 12/01/08 $389,000 00 12/01/09 $403,000 00 12/01/10 $417,000 00 12/01/11 $432,000 00 12/01/12 $448.000 00 12/01/13 $463,000 00 SECURITY: The Credit Facility will be a limited tax general obligation of the City PREPAYMENTS: If principal amounts prepaid, whether by voluntary prepayment or otherwise, the prepayment shall be accompanied by a prepayment fee as set forth in the attached Exhibit A 2 REPRESENTATIONS Usual and customary for transactions of this type, to include In addition, AND WARRANTIES- Borrower to provide a legal opinion of nationally recognized bond counsel, in form and substance acceptable to Bank and its legal counsel, that (i) the resolution and all documents related to the Credit Facility have been properly adopted, authorized and executed, (n)the resolution and all documents related to the Credit Facility constitute a legally binding obligation of the Borrower, payable from the security and enforceable according to their terms (subject to standard exceptions), (ui) that interest earnings on the Credit Facility are exempt from federal income taxes, and (iv) that the Borrower has designated the Credit Facility as a"bank qualified" obligation Bank of America is prepared to accept the opinion of Foster Pepper & Shefelman, PLLC as Note Counsel for Borrower REPORTING Financial Information from Borrower Borrower to provide financial REQUIREMENTS: information and statements in form and content acceptable to Bank of America indicated below • Upon receipt, the Borrower's annual State Audit Report • Within 270 days of the Borrower's fiscal year end, the Borrower's audited annual financial statements • Within 45 days of adoption, the Borrower's preliminary annual budget and final budget adoption ordinance EVENTS OF DEFAULT: Usual and customary in transactions of this type, to include without limitation (i) nonpayment of principal, interest, fees or other amounts, (ii) violation of covenants, (m) inaccuracy of representations and warranties, Rv) bankruptcy and other insolvency events, (vi) creditor or forfeiture proceedings, and (vii) actual or asserted invalidity of any loan documentation or security interests FOR DISCUSSION This Summary of Terms and Conditions does not constitute a PURPOSES commitment to lend by Bank of America or any of its affiliates and is ONLY: presented for discussion purposes only. The actual terms and conditions upon which Bank of America may extend credit to Borrower is subject to satisfactory completion of due diligence, necessary credit approval and such other terms and conditions as determined by Bank of America, in its sole discretion. ORAL AGREEMENTS OR ORAL COMMITMENTS TO LOAN MONEY, TO EXTEND CREDIT, OR TO FORBEAR FROM ENFORCING REPAYMENT OF A DEBT ARE NOT ENFORCEABLE UNDER WASHINGTON LAW. 3 Prepayment Fee—Breakfunding (Initial Cost of Funds Rate!Treasury Rate) The Prepayment Fee shall be the sum of fees calculated separately for each Prepaid Installment, as follows (1) Determine the amount of interest which would have accrued each month for the Prepaid Installment, had it remained outstanding until the applicable Original Payment Date at the Initial Cost of Funds Rate applicable to the Prepaid Installment, (2) Subtract from each monthly interest amount determined in (1) above, the amount of interest that would accrue for that Prepaid Installment if it were reinvested from the date of prepayment through the Original Payment Date, at the Treasury Rate, (3) If(1)above, minus(2) above, for the Prepaid Installment is greater than zero, discount the monthly difference to the date of prepayment by the Treasury Rate The sum of the discounted monthly differences is the prepayment fee for that Prepaid Installment, plus (4) An amount equal to all costs and expenses (subject to a cap of$200) Bank reasonably expects to incur in liquidation and reinvestment of such prepaid funds For purposes of this Section, the capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined have the following meanings (1) "Initial Cost of Funds Rate"means the fixed interest rate of interest per annum representing Borrower's cost of purchasing funds, or the cost of purchasing and exchanging funds through swaps or other derivative products, for an amount and under terms reflecting the characteristics of the Prepaid Installment from the date the Bond shall begin to bear interest through the Maturity Date (2) "Original Payment Dates" means the dates on which principal of the Bond would have been paid if there had been no prepayment If a portion of the principal would have been paid later than the end of the interest period in effect at the time of prepayment, then the Original Payment Date for that portion shall be the last day of the Interest Period (3) "Prepaid Installment"means the portion of the prepaid principal of the Bond that would have been paid on a single Original Payment Date (4) Treasury Rate" means the interest rate yield for U S Government Treasury Securities that the Bank determines could be obtained by reinvesting a specified Prepaid Installment in such securities from the date of prepayment through the Original Payment Date Bank may adjust the Treasury Rate and Initial Cost of Funds Rate to reflect the difference between the terms of such investments and the terms of the Bond, such as compounding, accrual basis, or other costs and terms Each of the rates is Bank's estimate only, and Bank is under no obligation to actually reinvest any prepayment The rates shall be based on information from either the Telerate or Reuters information services,The Wall Street Journal, or other information sources the Bank deems appropriate 4 Bankof America November 7, 2003 Ms May Miller Finance Director City of Kent 220 4`" Avenue South Kent,WA 98032 Re $2,114,000 LTGO Bond, Series 2003C (Tax-Exempt, Bank Qualified) Dear May Attached is a proposal for Bank of America to provide a tax-exempt municipal term loan to the City of Kent Please call either me at 503-275-1869, or Alex Johnston at 206-358-8938, to discuss any questions or comments you may have regarding the proposal We look forward to working with you on this transaction Very truly yours, BANK OF AMERICA, N A Douglas B Bowlsby Senior Vice President Cc Alex Johnston, Bank of America David Trageser, Banc of America Securities Distribution List SUMMARY OF TERMS AND CONDITIONS City of Kent,WA November 7,2003 (For Discussion Purposes Only) BORROWER: City of Kent,WA("City") LENDER: Bank of America, N A ("Bank of America") CREDIT FACILITY: Tax-exempt limited tax general obligation bond in the form of a municipal term loan in the amount of$2,114,000, or as negotiated(the "Credit Facility") PURPOSE Refund the callable 1992 LTGO Refunding Bonds and finance costs of issuance INTEREST RATE: Indicative rate of 2 30% fixed (tax-exempt, bank qualified), calculated on a 30/360-day basis Final pricing to be set up to one month prior to closing, as mutually agreed by City and Bank of America FEES AND EXPENSES. The City will pay the Bank's legal review fee of$500 REPAYMENTlMATURITY: Interest on the Credit Facility shall be paid semi-annually on June 1 and December 1 of each year, commencing June 1, 2004 Principal on the Credit Facility shall be repaid annually on December 1 of each year, commencing December 1, 2004, based on the following schedule Payment Date Principal Amount 12/01/04 $1,150,000 00 12/01/05 $313,000 00 12/01/06 $322,000 00 12/01/07 $329,000 00 SECURITY: The Credit Facility will be a limited tax general obligation of the City PREPAYMENTS. If principal amounts prepaid, whether by voluntary prepayment or otherwise, the prepayment shall be accompanied by a prepayment fee as set forth in the attached Exhibit A REPRESENTATIONS Usual and customary for transactions of this type, to include In addition, AND WARRANTIES: Borrower to provide a legal opinion of nationally recognized bond counsel, in form and substance acceptable to Bank and its legal counsel, that (i) the resolution and all documents related to the Credit Facility have been properly adopted, authorized and executed, (u)the resolution and all documents related to the Credit Facility constitute a legally binding obligation of the Borrower, payable from the security and enforceable according to their terms (subject to standard exceptions), (w) that interest earnings on the Credit Facility are exempt from federal income taxes, and (iv) that the Borrower has designated the Credit Facility as a"bank qualified" obligation Bank of America is prepared to accept the opinion of Foster Pepper & Shefelman, PLLC as Note Counsel for Borrower 2 REPORTING Financial Information from Borrower. Borrower to provide financial REQUIREMENTS. information and statements in form and content acceptable to Bank of America indicated below • Upon receipt, the Borrower's annual State Audit Report • Within 270 days of the Borrower's fiscal year end, the Borrower's audited annual financial statements • Within 45 days of adoption, the Borrower's preliminary annual budget and final budget adoption ordinance EVENTS OF DEFAULT Usual and customary in transactions of this type, to include without limitation (i) nonpayment of principal, interest, fees or other amounts, (u) violation of covenants, (ui) inaccuracy of representations and warranties, (iv) bankruptcy and other insolvency events, (vi) creditor or forfeiture proceedings, and (vu) actual or asserted invalidity of any loan documentation or security interests FOR DISCUSSION This Summary of Terms and Conditions does not constitute a PURPOSES commitment to lend by Bank of America or any of its affiliates and is ONLY: presented for discussion purposes only The actual terms and conditions upon which Bank of America may extend credit to Borrower is subject to satisfactory completion of due diligence, necessary credit approval and such other terms and conditions as determined by Bank of America, in its sole discretion. ORAL AGREEMENTS OR ORAL COMMITMENTS TO LOAN MONEY, TO EXTEND CREDIT, OR TO FORBEAR FROM ENFORCING REPAYMENT OF A DEBT ARE NOT ENFORCEABLE UNDER WASHINGTON LAW. 3 Prepayment Fee—Breakfundmg (initial Cost of Funds Rate/Treasury Rate) The Prepayment Fee shall be the sum of fees calculated separately for each Prepaid Installment, as follows (1) Determine the amount of interest which would have accrued each month for the Prepaid Installment, had it remained outstanding until the applicable Original Payment Date at the Initial Cost of Funds Rate applicable to the Prepaid Installment, (2) Subtract from each monthly interest amount determined in (1) above, the amount of interest that would accrue for that Prepaid Installment if it were reinvested from the date of prepayment through the Original Payment Date, at the Treasury Rate, (3) If(1) above, minus(2) above, for the Prepaid Installment is greater than zero, discount the monthly difference to the date of prepayment by the Treasury Rate The sum of the discounted monthly differences is the prepayment fee for that Prepaid Installment, plus (4) An amount equal to all costs and expenses (subject to a cap of$200) Bank reasonably expects to incur in liquidation and reinvestment of such prepaid funds For purposes of this Section, the capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined have the following meanings (1) "Initial Cost of Funds Rate"means the fixed interest rate of interest per annum representing Borrower's cost of purchasing funds, or the cost of purchasing and exchanging funds through swaps or other derivative products, for an amount and under terms reflecting the characteristics of the Prepaid Installment from the date the Bond shall begin to bear interest through the Maturity Date (2) "Original Payment Dates" means the dates on which principal of the Bond would have been paid if there had been no prepayment If a portion of the principal would have been paid later than the end of the interest period in effect at the time of prepayment, then the Original Payment Date for that portion shall be the last day of the Interest Period (3) "Prepaid Installment" means the portion of the prepaid principal of the Bond that would have been paid on a single Original Payment Date (4) Treasury Rate"means the interest rate yield for U S Government Treasury Securities that the Bank determines could be obtained by reinvesting a specified Prepaid Installment in such securities from the date of prepayment through the Original Payment Date Bank may adjust the Treasury Rate and Initial Cost of Funds Rate to reflect the difference between the terms of such investments and the terms of the Bond, such as compounding, accrual basis, or other costs and terms Each of the rates is Bank's estimate only, and Bank is under no obligation to actually reinvest any prepayment The rates shall be based on information from either the Telerate or Reuters information services,The Wall Street Journal, or other information sources the Bank deems appropriate 4 • SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS CITY OF KENT WASHINGTON LTGO Bond,2003 Series A(Taxable) Dated Date 1218'2003 Delivery Date 121&`2003 Sources Bond Proceeds Par Amount 1 878 000 00 1 878 000 00 Uses Project Fund Deposits Kent Station-Repav Water Fund 1 200 000 00 PDA Saturdav Market-Retire US Bank Loan 662 388 71 1 862 388 71 Dehvery Date Expenses BAS Structuring Fee 9 390 00 Bond Counsel 5 000 00 Bank Counsel 50000 1489000 Other Uses of Funds Additional Proceeds 721 29 1 878 000 00 • Nov 19 2003 2 36 pm Prepared by Banc ofAmenca Securities LLC IFinance 5 002 KENT KENTCITY-2003TAXA) Page I BOND SUMMARY STATISTICS CITY OF KENT,WASHINGTON LTGO Bond,2003 Series A(Taxable) Dated Date 12/18i2003 Delivery Date 12/18/2003 Last Maturity 12/01i2018 Arbitrage Yield 5 450458% True Interest Cost(TIC) 5 450458% Net Interest Cost(N1C) 5 450000% All-In TIC 5 569482% Average Coupon 5 450000% Average Life(years) 8 944 Duration of Issue(years) 6 883 Par Amount 1 878 000 00 Bond Proceeds 1 878 000 00 Total Interest 915 399 26 Net Interest 915 39926 Total Debt Service 2 793.399 26 Martimum Annual Debt Service 187 086 00 Average Annual Debt Service 196 91474 Undenvnter's Fees(per$1000) Average Takedown Other Fee Total Undenvnter's Discount Bid Price 100 000000 Par Average Average Bond Component Value Price Coupon Life Sena)Bond 1 878 000 00 100 000 5 450°0 8 944 1 878 000 00 8 944 Nov 19 2003 2 36 pm Prepared by Banc of America Securities LLC (Finance 5 002 KENT KENTCITY-2003TAXA) Page 2 BOND SUMMARY STATISTICS CITY OF KENT,WASHINGTON LTGO Bond.2003 Series A(Taxable) All-In Arbitra¢e TIC TIC Yield Par Value 1 878 000 00 1 878 000 00 1 81800000 +Accrued Interest +Premium(Discount) -Undemnter s Discount -Cost of Issuance Expense -Other Amounts -14 890 00 Target Value 1 878 000 00 1,863 110 00 1,978 000 00 Tareet Date 12 18'2003 1218/2003 12 18'2003 Yield 5 4504580 S 5 5694820'0 5 4504580 o Nov 19,2003 2 36 pm Prepared by Banc of America Secunties LLC (Finance 5 002 KENT KENTCITY-2003TAXA) Page 3 BOND PRICING CITY OF KENT,WASHINGTON LTGO Bond,2003 Series A(Taxable) Maturity Bond Component Date Amount Rate Yield Price Sena]Bond. 12/01/2004 81.000 5 450% 5 450% 100 000 12/01/2005 89,000 5 450% 5 450% 100 000 12/01/2006 94,000 5 450% 5 450% 100000 12/01/2007 99,000 5 450% 5 450% 100 000 121O1/2008 104,000 5 450% 5 450% 100 000 12'O1,2009 110,000 5 450% 5 450% 100 000 12'01/2010 116,000 5 450% 5 4500/a 100 000 12'01/2011 122 000 5 450% 5 450% 100 000 12,101/2012 129.000 5 450% 5 450% 100 000 12/01'2013 136.000 5 450% 5 450% 100 000 12/01,2014 143,000 5 4500'o 5 450% 100 000 12/01,'2015 151 000 5 450% 5 450% 100 000 12'01'2016 159,000 5 45000 5 45000 100 000 12/01;2017 168 000 5 450% 5 450% 100 000 12/Ol/2018 177 000 5 45000 5 4500% 100 000 1 878 000 Dated Date 12/18'2003 Delivery Date 12'18'2003 First Coupon 06'O1'2004 Par Amount 1 878 000 00 Original Issue Discount Production 1 878,000 00 100 00000000 Underwriters Discount Purchase Price 1 878 000 00 100 0000000a Accrued Interest Net Proceeds 1 878 000 00 Nov 19,2003 2 36 pm Prepared by Banc of America Securities LLC (Finance 5 002 KENT KENTCITY-2003TAXA) Page 4 BOND DEBT SERVICE CITY OF KENT,WASHINGTON LTGO Bond,2003 Series A(Taxable) Period Annual Ending Principal Coupon Interest Debt Service Debt Service 12'182003 06/01;2004 46 342 26 46 342 26 12i01'2004 81 000 5 450% 51 175 50 132,175 50 178,517 76 06'0112005 4896925 48 968 25 12/01/2005 89,000 5 450% 48 968 25 137,968 25 196 936 50 06,01/2006 46 543 00 46 543 00 12/01/2006 94,000 5 450% 46 54300 140,543 00 187 086 00 06/01/2007 43 981 50 43,981 50 12/012007 99 000 5 450% 43 981 50 142,981 50 186 963 00 0&012008 41 283 75 41 283 75 12,'01/2008 104.000 545006 41 28375 145.283 75 186 567 50 06/01/2009 38 449 75 38 449 75 12 01/2009 110 000 5 45000 38 449 75 148 449 75 186 89950 06'01'2010 35 452 25 35 452 25 12%0F2010 116 000 5 45000 35 452 25 151 452 25 196 90450 06,01'2011 32 291 25 32 291 25 12.01'2011 122 000 5 45000 32 291 25 154 291 25 186 58250 06 012012 28 966 75 28,966 75 12'01 2012 129 000 54500. 28 96675 157 966 75 196 933 50 06/012013 25 451 50 25 451 50 12'01'2013 136 000 5 45000 25 451 50 161 451 50 186 903 00 06'01,2014 21 745 50 21-745 50 12 01 2014 143 000 5 45000 21 745 50 164 745 50 186 491 00 06 01'2015 1794875 1794975 12,0112015 151 000 54500. 17 848 75 168 848 75 186 69750 06 0I'2016 13 734 00 13 734 00 1201 2016 159 000 5 45000 13 73400 172 73400 196 468 00 06'01 2017 9 401 25 9 401 25 12,1012017 169 000 5 45000 9 401 25 177 401 25 196 802 50 06'012018 4 823 25 4 823 25 12,'0112018 177 000 5 45000 4 823 25 181 82325 186 646 50 1 878 000 915 399 26 2 793 39926 2 793,399 26 No,, 19,2003 2 36 pm Prepared by Banc of America Securities LLC (Finance 5 002 KENT KENTCITY-2003TAXA) Page 5 BOND DEBT SERVICE CITY OF KENT,WASHINGTON LTGO Bond,2003 Series A(Taxable) Period Ending Principal Coupon Interest Debt Service 12/01/2004 81,000 5 450% 97,517 76 178,517 76 12,011,2005 89,000 5 45000 97,936 50 186,936 50 12'01/2006 94 000 5 4504o 93,086 00 I87,086 00 12/01/2007 99,000 5 45000 87,96300 186,963 00 12?01/2008 104,000 5 450% 82 567 50 186 567 50 12,01/2009 110,000 5 450% 76 899 50 186,899 50 12/01/2010 116,000 5 4500 o 70,904 50 186,904 50 12,01/201 I 122,000 5 450% 64 582 50 186 582 50 12,01,2012 129,000 5 4500o 57 933 50 186,933 50 12/01/2013 136,000 5 4500 o 50 903 00 196,903 00 12/01/2014 143.000 5 450% 43 491 00 186,491 00 12'01/2015 151,000 5 4500o 35,697 50 186697 50 12'01'2016 159 000 5 450°0 27 468 00 I S6 468 00 12'01'2017 168 000 5 45000 18 802 50 196,802 50 12,'01'2018 177 000 5 45000 9 6,46 50 186 646 50 1 978 000 915 399 26 2 793,399 26 Nov 19,2003 2 36 pin Prepared by Banc of America Securities LLC (Finance 5 002 KENT KENTCITY-2D03TAXA) Page 6 SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS CITY OF KENT,WASHINGTON LTGO Bond,2003 Series B(Tax-Exempt) Dated Date 1218'2003 Delivery Date 12/19'2003 i ' Sources I Bond Proceeds Par Amount 3 526 000 00 3 526 000 00 Uses Project Fund Deposits LTGO Project}und 3 500 370 00 Delivery Date Expenses BAS Structunne Fee 17 630 00 Bond Counsel 7 SW 00 Bank Counsel 500 00 25 63000 3 526 000 00 Nov 19 2003 2 37 pm Prepared by Banc of America Secunttes LLC (Finance 5 002 KENT KLN7 CITY-2003) Pagel BOND SUMMARY STATISTICS CITY OF KENT,WASHINGTON LTGO Bond,2003 Series B(Tax-Exempt) Dated Date 12/I 9'2003 Delivery Date 12"IW2003 Last Maturity 12,'01/2013 Arbitrage Yield 3 633470°/a True Interest Cost(TIC) 3 543007% Net Interest Cost(NIC) 3 5500009.0 All-In TIC 3 674715% Average Coupon 3 550000% Average Life(years) 6 323 Duration of Issue(years) 5 644 Par Amount 3 526,000 00 Bond Proceeds 3,526,000 00 Total Interest 791 525 55 Net Interest 791,525 55 Total Debt Service 4,317.525 55 Maximum Annual Debt Service 480 340 50 Average Annual Debt Senice 433 801 06 Undere nter's Fees(per 51000) Average TakedoHn Other Fee Total Undensnters Discount Bid Price 100 000000 Par At crake AN ereee Bond Component Value Price Coupon Lite Senal Bond 3 526 000 00 100 000 3 5500,o 6 323 3,526 000 00 6 323 0 Nov 19,2003 2 37 pm Prepared by Banc of America Securities LLC (Finance 5 002 KENT KENTCITY-2003) Page 2 BOND SUMMARY STATISTICS CITY OF KENT,WASHINGTON LTGO Bond 2003 Series B(Tax-Exempt) All-In Arbitrage TIC TIC Yield Par Value 3 526,000 00 3,526 000 00 3 526 000 00 +Accrued Interest +Premium(Discount) -Undemnter's Discount -Cost of Issuance Expense -Other Amounts -25 630 00 -17 630 00 Target Value 3 526 000 00 3,500 370 00 3 508 370 00 Target Date 12'18i2003 12'18'2003 12 182003 Yield 3 543007% 3 6747150,o 3 63347Mo i Nov 19,2003 2 37 pm Prepared by Banc of America Securities LLC (Finance 5 002 KENT KENTCITY-2003) Page 3 BOND PRICING CITY OF KENT,WASHINGTON LTGO Bond 2003 Series B(Tax-Exempt) Maturity Bond Component Date Amount Rate Yield Price Senal Bond I2T112005 235,000 3 550% 3 550% 100 000 12/01/2006 363,000 3 550% 3 550% 100 000 12/01/2007 376,000 3 550% 3 550% 100000 12/Ol/2008 389,000 3 550% 3 550% 100 000 12/O1/2009 403 000 3 550% 3 550% 100 000 12'0112010 417,000 3 55006 3 550% 100000 12'01/2011 432,000 3 550% 3 550% 100 000 12201/2012 448 000 3 550% 3 550% 100 000 1101/2013 463 000 3 550% 3 550% 100 000 3526.000 Dated Date 1218%2003 Delivery Date 1211&'2003 First Coupon 02/01;2005 Par Amount 3 526 000 00 Original Issue Discount Production 3 526 000 00 100 0000000 o Underu nter s Discount I Purchase Price 3 526 000 00 100 000000% Accrued Interest Net Proceeds 3 526.000 00 Nov 19,2003 2 37 pm Prepared by Banc of America Securities LLC (Finance 5 002 KENT KENTCITY-2003) Page 4 BOND DEBT SERVICE CITY OF KENT,WASHINGTON LTGO Band,2003 Series B(Tar-Exempt) Period Annual Ending Principal Coupon Interest Debt Service Debt Service 12/18I2003 02/01/2005 140,124 22 140 12422 06/01/2005 41,724 33 41 72433 1201-2005 235,000 3 55000 62 58650 297,586 50 479,435 05 06l0L'2006 5941525 58,41525 12'01/2006 363,000 3 5500b 58 415 25 421 415 25 479 83050 06/012007 51 97200 51,972 00 12/01'2007 376,000 3 5500/6 51 97200 427,972 00 479 944 00 06 012008 45 298 00 45 298 00 12'01,2008 399 000 3 5500 0 4529900 43429900 479 596 00 06/01'2009 38 393 25 38 393 25 12/01'2009 401000 3 550% 38 39325 441.393 25 479 786 50 06,01 2010 31 24000 31 24000 12'01'2010 417 000 3 55000 31 24000 448 240 00 479 490 00 06f01'2011 23 83925 23 838 25 12,01 2011 432 000 3 5500'0 23 83825 455 83825 479 676 50 06'01'2012 16 17025 16 17025 12 0 L 2012 448 000 3 5500 0 16 17025 464.170 25 480 340 50 012013 821825 8 21825 /2 12,01'2013 463 000 3 5500 0 8 218 25 471 21825 479 436 50 3 526 000 791 525 55 4 317 525 55 4 317 525 55 Nov 19,2003 2 37 pm Prepared by Banc of America Secunties LLC (Finance 5 002 KENT KENTCITY-2003) Page 5 BOND DEBT SERVICE • CITY OF KENT,WASHINGTON LTGO Bond 2003 Series B(Tax-Exempt) Period Ending Principal Coupon Interest Debt Service 1201/2004 12101/2005 235,000 3 550% 244 435 05 479 435 05 12/01/2006 363.000 3550% 116,83050 479,83050 1201/2007 376 000 3 550% 103,944 OD 479,944 00 12/01/2008 389,000 3 550% 90 596 00 479,596 00 120112009 403,000 3 550% 76,796 50 479,786 50 12'01/2010 417,000 3 550% 62 480 00 479,490 00 12012011 432,000 3 550% 47,676 50 479 676 50 1201'2012 448,000 3 550% 32 34050 480,340 50 12'012013 463,000 3 550% 1643650 479 436 50 3 526,000 791 52555 4 317 525 55 Nosy 19,2003 2 37 pm Prepared by Banc of America Securities LLC (Finance 5 002 KENT KENTCITY-2003) Page 6 SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS CITY OF KENT,WASHINGTON LTGO Refunding Bond 2003 Series C(Tax-Exempt) Dated Date 12 I8i2003 Delivery Date 12/1&'2003 Sources Bond Proceeds Par Amount 2,114 000 00 2 114 000 00 Uses Refunding Escrow Deposits Cash Deposit 2 095 o04 17 Delis cry Date Expenses BAS Strucmnng Fee 10 570 00 Bank Counsel 50000 Bond Counsel 5 000 00 M i sc 2 000 00 1907000 Other Uses of Funds Additional Proceeds 325 83 2 114 000 00 Nos 19,2003 2 38 pm Prepared b}Banc of America Securities LLC (Finance 5 002 KENT KENTCITY-03REF92 03REF92) Page 1 SUMMARY OF REFUNDING RESULTS • CITY OF KENT,WASHINGTON LTGO Refunding Bond 2003 Series C(Tax-Exempt) Dated Date 12/18/2003 Delivery Date 12/18/2003 Arbitrage-yield 2 578018°0 Escrow yield Bond Par Amount 2,114,000 00 True Interest Cost 2 300308oio Net Interest Cost 2 300000% Average Coupon 2 30000000 Average Life 1 872 Par amount of refunded bonds 2080 000 00 Average coupon of refunded bonds 6 488970% Average life of refunded bonds 1 837 PV of pnor debt to 12/18'2003 Ca 2 57801806 2 230 009 98 Net PV Savings 126 905 81 Percentage savings of refunded bonds 6 101241Do Percentage sa-yings o1 refunding bonds 6 0031130o 0 Nov 19,2003 2 38 pm Prepared by Banc of America Securities LLC (Finance 5 002 KENT KENTCITY-03REF92,03REF92) Page 2 SAVINGS CITY OF KENT,WASHINGTON LTGO Refunding Bond.2003 Series C(Tax-Exempt) Present Value Prior Refunding Annual to 12,18 2003 Date Debt Service Debt Service Savings Savmgs � 2 57801800,o 06012004 66 875 00 22 014 96 44 860 04 44 342 75 12/01/2004 1 246 875 00 1,174,311 00 72 564 00 117 424 04 70 814 45 06/01/2005 29 410 00 11 08600 18 324 00 1765463 1101/2005 309,410 00 324 086 00 -14 676 00 3 64800 -13 959 95 06,01/2006 2031000 7,48650 12 823 50 12 042 60 12,01/2006 320,310 00 329,486 50 -9 17650 3 647 00 -8 508 02 06,01/2007 10 560 00 3,783 50 6 776 50 6 202 90 12/01/2007 330 56000 332,783 50 -2 223 50 4 55300 -2 009 39 2.334 310 00 2 205 037 96 129.272 04 129 272 04 126 579 98 Savings Summary PV of sa%mgs from cash flow 126 579 98 Plus Refunding funds on hand 325 83 Net PV Sacmgs 126 905 81 Nov 19,2003 2 38 pm Prepared by Banc of America Securities LLC (Finance 5 002 KENT KENTCITY-03REF92 03REF92) Page 3 BOND SUMMARY STATISTICS CITY OF KENT,WASHINGTON LTGO Refunding Bond,2003 Series C(Tax-Exempt) Dated Date 12/19/2003 Delivery Date 12/1&'2003 Last Maturity 12/01/2007 Arbitrage Yield 2 578018% True Interest Cost(TIC) 23003080,6 Net Interest Cost(NIC) 2 300000% All-In TIC 2 776474% Average Coupon 2 300000% Average Life(years) 1 872 Duration of Issue(years) 1829 Par Amount 2,114,000 00 Bond Proceeds 2,114 000 00 Total Interest 91,037 96 Net Interest 91 03796 Total Debt Service 2 205,037 96 Maximum Annual Debt Service 1 196,325 96 AN eraee Annual Debt Service 557,945 16 Undenl ntei s Fees(per S1000) Average Takedown Other Fee Total Underwriter's Discount I Bid Pnce 100 000000 Par Average Average Bond Component Value Price Coupon Lite Sena!Band 2,114 000 00 100 000 2 3000 o 1 872 2 114 000 00 1 872 Nov 19,2003 2 38 pm Prepared by Banc of America Securities LLC (Finance 5 002 KENT KENTCITY-03REF92,03REF92) Page 4 0 BOND SUMMARY STATISTICS CITY OF KENT,WASHINGTON LTGO Refunding Bond,2003 Series C(Tax-Exempt) All-In Arbitrage TIC TIC Yield Par Value 2,114 000 00 2 114,000 00 2,114 000 00 +Accrued Interest +Premium(Discount) -UnderHntei s Discount -Cost of Issuance Expense -Other Amounts -I8 070 00 -10 570 00 Target Value 2 114,000 00 2 095,930 00 2 103 430 00 Tareet Date I118'2003 12 182003 12182003 Yield 2 3003080,0 2 7764740o 2 57801800 Nov 19.2003 2 38 pm Prepared bN Banc of Amenca SecunLeti LLC (Finance 5 002 KENT KENTCITY-03REF92,03REF92) Page 5 BOND PRICING CITY OF KENT,WASHINGTON LTGO Refunding Bond,2003 Series C(Tax-Exempt) Maturity Bond Component Date Amount Rate Yield Pnce Senal Bond 12'01 2004 1,150 000 2 300% 2 300% 100 000 12,01,2005 313.000 2 300% 2 300% 100 000 12/01,2006 322,000 2 300% 2 300% 100 000 12'0I/2007 329,000 2 300% 2 300% 100 000 2,114,000 Dated Date 12'18'2003 Delivery Date 12 1&'2003 First Coupon 06/01/2004 Par Amount 2 114,000 00 Original Issue Discount Production 2 114 000 00 100 000000% Undensrtters Discount Purchase Price 2 114 000 00 100 0000000 0 Accrued Interest Net Proceeds 2 114 000 00 Nov 19 2003 2 38 pm Prepared by Banc of America Securities LLC (Finance 5 002 KENT KENTCITY-03REF92 03REF92) Page 6 BOND DEBT SERVICE CITY OF KENT,WASHINGTON LTGO Refunding Bond.2003 Series C(Tax-Exempt) Period Annual Ending Principal Coupon Interest Debt Sen ice Debt Service 12'1&'2003 06 01/2004 22,014 96 22 014 96 12/01/2004 1,150,000 2300°0 24,31100 1,174,31100 1 196 32596 06,01'2005 1 1086 00 11 08600 12'01/2005 313 000 2 300% 11 08600 324,086 00 335,172 00 06/01/2006 7,48650 7 486 50 12/01/2006 322,000 2 300% 7 486 50 329 486 50 336 973 00 06'0 V2007 3,78350 3 783 50 12'01/2007 329 000 2 30000 3 783 50 332 783 50 336 56700 2 114 000 91 03796 2 205 037 96 2 205 037 96 • Nov 19 2003 2 39 pm Prepared by Banc of America Securities LLC (Finance 5 002 KENT KENTCITY-03REF92 03REF92) Page 7 BOND DEBT SERVICE CITY OF KENT,WASHINGTON LTGO Refunding Bond,2003 Series C(Tax-Exempt) Period Ending Principal Coupon Interest Debt Service 12/Ol/2004 1,150000 2300% 46,32596 1,196,32596 12/O1/2005 313 000 2 300% 22,172 00 335,172 00 12?01/2006 322 000 2 300% 14,973 00 336 973 00 12�01/2007 329,000 2 300% 7,56700 336,567 00 2,114,000 91,037 96 2,205,037 96 Nov 19,2003 2 38 pm Prepared by Banc of America Securities LLC (Finance 5 002 KENT KENTCITY-03REF92 03REF92) Page 8 SUMMARY OF BONDS REFUNDED CITY OF KENT,WASHINGTON LTGO Refunding Bond 2003 Series C(Tax-Exempt) Maturity Interest Par Call Call Bond Date Rate Amount Date Price LTGO REFUNDING BONDS, 1992,92LT SERIALS 12'01/2004 6 3500o 1,180 000 00 01/13%2004 100 000 12'01/2005 6 5000 0 .18000000 01 A 3 2004 100 000 12/01/2W6 65000,o 300 000 00 01'13/2004 100 000 12,01/2007 6 6000,o 320 000 00 01 r 13'2004 100 000 2 080 000 00 Noy 19,2003 2 38 pm Prepared by Banc of America Securities LLC (Finance 5 002 KENT KENTCITY-03REF92,03REF92) Page 9 PRIOR BOND DEBT SERVICE CITY OF KENT,WASHINGTON LTGO Refunding Bond,2003 Senes C(Tax-Exempt) Annual Period Debt Debt Ending Principal Coupon Interest Sernce Service 12,E l K2003 06/01/2004 66 875 66,875 12/01/2004 1,180,000 6350% 66,875 1246,875 1,313,750 06�01/2005 29410 29410 12/01;2005 280,000 6500% 29,410 309,410 338.820 06/01/2006 20,310 20,310 12/01!2006 300,000 6 5000,o 20,310 320,310 340,620 06/'012007 10 560 10,560 12/012007 320,000 6 600% 10 560 330,560 341,120 2,080A00 254,310 2,334 310 2334,310 Nov 19,2003 2 38 pm Prepared by Banc of America Securities LLC (Finance 5 002 KENT KENTCITY-03REF92,03REF92) Page 10 i ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City of Kent, Washington, relating to contracting indebtedness; providing for the issuance of $1,878,000 par value Limited Tax General Obligation Bond, 2003, Series A (Taxable) to reimburse certain City funds previously used to pay a portion of the Kent Station Project and refinance an outstanding loan obligation of the Kent Downtoti n Public Market Development Authority incurred for the Saturday Market building improvements and paying the costs of I issuance and sale of such bond, S3,526,000 par N alue Limited Tax General Obligation Bond, 2003, Series B (Tax-Exempt) to provide financing for a portion of certain City technology improvements and paying the costs of issuance and sale of such bond, and $2,114,000 par value Limited Tax General Obligation Refunding Bond, 2003, Series C (Tax-Exempt) to provide the funds required to refund in a current refunding the City's outstanding Limited Tax General Obligation Refunding Bonds, 1992, and to pay the costs of issuance and sale of such bond, providing for the call, payment and redemption of the outstanding bonds to be refunded, fixing the date, form. maturities, interest rates, terms and covenants of the bonds, establishing a bond fund, and approving the sale and providing for the delivery of the bonds to Bank of America, N.A , of Seattle, Washington I PASSED. DECEMBER 9, 2003 This docirnient piepared by FOSTER PEPPER & SHEFELMAN PLLC 1111 Third Avenue Seattle, WA 98101 (206) 447-4400 50187%9p6 1 LTGO Bonds, 2003, Series A, B and C TABLE OF CONTENTS TAB SECTION 1. Definitions. .... ..... ... ...... .. ............ ..... ... .... ... . . ... ...... . .. ... ....3 SECTION2. Debt Capacity..... ..... . ....... ...... ............... ............ ........... . . . .... . ...5 SECTION 3. Authorization of Bonds ... ............. ..... ............... ...... . ...... .. .. .5 SECTION 4. Description of Bonds .......... .. .. .. ..... ....... . ... ... ..... . ... .5 SECTION 5. Bond Registrar; Registration and Transfer of Bonds... . 7 SECTION 6. Payment of Bonds. ..... 8 SECTION 7. Optional Prepayment of Bonds . . ... ...... ............. ... . 91 SECTION 8. Failure To Pay Installments .. . .9 SECTION 9. Pledge of Taxes ... .. . 9 i SECTION 10 Form and Execution of Bonds 9 SECTION 11 Refunding of the Refunded Bonds....... ...... ...... . . 10 SECTION 12. Call for Redemption of the Refunded Bonds 11i it SECTION 13 Findings «ith Respect to Refunding Ili SECTION 14 Preservation of Tax Exemption for Interest on Tax-Exempt Bonds 12` SECTION 15. Designation of Tax-Exempt Bonds as "Qualified Tax-Exempt Obligations.... .. .. .. ..... . .. . . .. 12 i' SECTION 16. Refunding or Defeasance of the Bonds........ .... . . 13 SECTION 17 Bond Fund, Project Fund and Deposit and Use of Bond Proceeds. . . 13 SECTION 18 Approval of Transaction.......... ... .... ...... ... .. . ... . . 14 SECTION 19 Severability.. ... .. .... . .. ... ... .. 15 SECTION 20. Effective Date. ...... .. ...... ..... ... .... .......... .. .. .. ... . . 15 3018706906 1 LTGO Bands, 2003,Series A, B and C ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City of Kent, Washington, relating to contracting indebtedness; providing for the issuance of $1,878,000 par value Limited Tax General Obligation Bond, 2003, Series A (Taxable) to reimburse certain City funds previously used to pay a portion of the Kent Station Project and refinance an outstanding loan obligation of the Kent Downtown Public Market Development Authority incurred for the Saturday Market building improiements and paying the costs of issuance and sale of such bond, $3,526,000 par value Limited Tax General Obligation Bond, 2003, Series B (Tax-Exempt) to provide financing for a portion of certain City technology improvements and paying the costs of issuance and sale of such bond, and S2,114,000 par value Limited Tax General Obligation Refunding Bond, 2003, Series C (Tax-Exempt) to provide the funds required to refund in a current refunding the City's outstanding ` Limited Tax General Obligation Refunding Bonds, 1992, !� and to pay the costs of issuance and sale of such bond, providing for the call, payment and redemption of the I outstanding bonds to be refunded, fixing the date, form, maturities, interest rates, terms and covenants of the bonds; establishing a bond fund, and approving the sale and providing for the delivery of the bonds to Bank of America, i N.A., of Seattle, Washington �I i WHEREAS, the City of Kent, Washington (the "City"), is in need of funds with which to reimburse certain City funds previously used to finance aportion of the cost of acquiring land for the Kent Station, and to refinance a loan obligation of the Kent Downtown Public Market Development Authority incurred for the Saturday Market building improvements and paying the costs of issuance and sale of such bond, the estimated cost of which is $1,878,000, and paying the costs of issuance of abond to �I 5038700906 1 LTGO Bonds, 2003, Series A, B and C be issued for that purpose, and the City does not have available sufficient funds to pay those costs; and WHEREAS, the City is in need of funds with which to finance a portion of certain technology improvements and paying the costs of issuance of a bond to be issued for that purpose, the total estimated cost of which is $3,526,000, and paying the costs of issuance of a bond to be issued for that purpose, and the City does not have available sufficient funds to pay those costs; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Ordinance No. 3039 of the City, the City heretofore issued $10,575,000 par value Limited Tax General Obligation Refunding Bonds, 1992 (the "1992 Bonds"); and I, WHEREAS, pursuant to Ordinance No. 3039, the City reserved the right to redeem the 1992 Bonds maturing on or after December 1, 2003, as a nhole or in part at any time on or after December 1, 2002, at par plus accrued interest, and WHEREAS, there are presently outstanding S2,080,000 par Nalue of 1992 Bonds maturing on December l of each of the years 2004 through 2007, mcluske, and bearing %arious interest rates from 6 35% to 6 60% (the "Refunded Bonds"); and WHEREAS, after due consideration, it appears to the City Council that the Refunded Bonds may be refunded by the issuance and sale of a bond authorized herein so that a substantial savings Ne ill be effected by the difference betneen the principal and interest cost over the life of the bond authorized herein for such purpose and the principal and interest over the life of the Refunded Bonds but for such I refunding, which refunding will be effected by the Refunding Plan (as defined below); and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is necessary to authorize the issuance of three separate series of bonds to provide funds to pay the cost of carrying out the various purposes recited above and to pay the administrative costs of such refunding and costs of issuance of the authorized bonds; and 5038?0 906 2 LTGO Bands, 2003,Series A, B and C WHEREAS, Bank of America, N.A , Seattle, Washington, has offered to purchase the bonds under the terms and conditions set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I - De ntlons As used in this ordinance, the following words have the following meanings- "Bank" means Bank of America, N A , of Seattle, Washington I� "Bond Fund" means the Limited Tax General Obligation Bond Fund, 2003 (Series A, B and C), created and established by this ordinance. I "Bond Registrar"means the Finance Director "Bonds" means, collectively, the Series A Bond, the Series B Bond and the Series C Bond, and "Bond" means any of the Bonds II I"City" means the City of Kent, Washington "Finance Director" means the Finance Director of the City (or the successor officer to the Finance Director). "Proposal Letters" means the three separate Proposal Letters for each I I Senes of Bonds, together with their respective Summary of Terms and Conditions of the Bank dated November 7, 2003, describing certain conditions under which the Bank proposes to purchase the Bonds "Refunded Bonds" means the outstanding S2,080,000 par %alue of Limited Tax General Obligation Refunding Bonds, 1992, of the City maturing in the years 2004 through 2007, inclusive, issued pursuant to Ordinance No 3039, the refunding of which has been provided for by this ordinance. III 5038706906 3 LTGO Bonds, 2003,Series A, B and C "Registered Owner" means the Bank, as registered owner of the Bond, or any subsequent owner of the Bond. "Refunding Plan" means: (a) the Finance Director's deposit of proceeds of the Series C Bond and other money of the City, if necessary, to the credit of the bond fund established by Ordinance No. 3039 for the Refunded Bonds in an amount sufficient to pay the outstanding principal of and interest to be accrued on the Refunded Bonds to January 13, 2004, and (b) on January 13, 2004, the call, payment and redemption of all of the then-outstanding Refunded Bonds at a price of par plus accrued interest. "Series A Bond" means the Limited Tax General Obligation Bond, 12003, Series A (Taxable), of the City issued pursuant to and under the authority of this �i ordinance for the Series A Project �I "Series A Project" means the reimbursement to the City's Water Fund for a portion of prior expenditures made to acquire land for the Kent Station and the repayment and refinancing of the U S. Bank Loan. "Series B Bond" means the Limited Tax General Obligation Bond, 2003, Series B (Tax-Exempt), of the City issued pursuant to and under the authority of this ordinance to finance the Series B Project "Series B Project" means paying part of the costs of the Tech Plan 11, primarily for the Public Safety System for the jail and records management systems, providing officer reporting, crime analysis, and mug shot tools, technology severs, security upgrades, and for productivity software or other technology projects "Series C Bond" means the Limited Tax General Obligation Refunding Bond, 2003, Series C (Tax-Exempt), of the City issued pursuant to and under the authority of this ordinance to carry out the Refunding Plan. "Tax-Exempt Bonds"means the Series B Bond and the Series C Bond. i 50387069C6 4 LTGO Bonds, 2003,Series A, B and C "U.S. Bank Loan" means that certain loan made on April 27, 1999, by U.S. Bank National Association to the Kent Downtown Public Market Development Authority and evidenced by a Promissory Note of such Authority dated April 27, 1999. SECTION 2 - Debt Capacity. The assessed valuation of the taxable property within the City as ascertained by the last preceding assessment for City purposes for the calendar year 2003 is 88,175,782,374, and the City, as of October 31, 2003, has outstanding general indebtedness evidenced by limited tax general obligation bonds, notes, leases and conditional sales contracts in the principal amount of I 575,395,713 incurred within the limit of up to 1-1/2% of the value of the taxable property within the City permitted for general municipal purposes a ithout a vote of the qualified voters therein, and unlimited tax general obligation bonds or notes in the principal amount of 57,625,000 incurred within the limit of up to 2-l/2% of the Nalue 1 of the taxable property within the City for capital purposes only, issued pursuant to a vote of the qualified Voters of the City, and the amount of indebtedness for NNhich bonds are authorized herein to be issued is 57,518,000 SECTION 3 - .4utho i:ation of Bonds The City shall borro% money on the credit of the City and issue its limited tax general obligation bonds eNidencing that indebtedness in the aggregate principal amount of 57,518,000 for general City purposes to provide financing for the Series A Project and the Series B Project,to carry out the Refunding Plan and to pay the respective costs of issuance and sale of the Bonds properly allocable to each Bond (the "costs of issuance") The general indebtedness to be incurred shall be �Nithm the limit of up to 1-I/21% of the value of the taxable property within the City permitted for general municipal purposes %ithout a vote of the qualified voters therein. SECTION 4 - Description of fonds. The Series A Bond shall be called the Limited Tax General Obligation Bond, 2003, Series A (Taxable), of the City; shall be in the aggregate principal amount of S 1,878,000, shall be dated its date of delivery; shall mature December 1, 2018, shall be numbered T-1, shall be in fully registered form; and shall bear interest at the rate of 5 45% per annum (computed on the basis of ii a 360-day year of twelve 30-day months), payable semiannually on each June 1 and w�B,�9 5 LTGO Bonds, 2003, Series A, B and C December 1, commencing June 1, 2004, to the maturity or earlier prepayment of the Series A Bond. Principal of the Series A Bond shall be payable in annual installments on December 1 of each year in accordance with the following schedule: Installment Principal Year Amount 2004 S 81,000 2005 89,000 2006 94,000 2007 99,000 2008 104,000 2009 110,000 2010 116,000 2011 122,000 2012 129,000 2013 136,000 2014 143,000 2015 151,000 2016 159,000 2017 168,000 2018 177,000 The Series B Bond shall be called the Limited Tax General Obligation Bond, 2003, Series B (Tax-Exempt), of the City, shall be in the aggregate principal amount of S3,526,000, shall be dated its date of delivery, shall mature December 1, 2013, shall be numbered R-1; shall be in fully registered form, and shall bear interest at the rate of i i 3.55% per annum (computed on the basis of a 360-day year of twelve 30-day months), P ( P . � payable on February 1, 2005, and thereafter semiannually on each June 1 and December 1, commencing June 1, 2005, to the maturity or earlier prepayment of the Series B Bond Principal of the Series B Bond shall be payable in annual installments on December t of each year in accordance with the following schedule: 50387%906 6 LTGO Bonds, 2003, Series A, B and C Installment Principal Year Amount 2005 $235,000 2006 363,000 2007 376,000 2008 389,000 2009 403,000 2010 417,000 2011 432,000 2012 448,000 2013 463,000 The Series C Bond shall be called the Limited Tax General Obligation Refunding Bond, 2003, Series C (Tax-Exempt), of the City, shall be in the aggregate principal amount of $2,114,000, shall be dated its date of delivery, shall mature December 1, 2007; shall be numbered R-2; shall be in fully registered form, and shall bear interest at the rate of 2.30% per annum (computed on the basis of a 360-day year of mehe 30-day months), payable semiannually on each June I and December 1, commencing June 1, 2004, to the maturity or earlier prepayment of the Series C Bond Principal of the Series C Bond shall be payable in annual installments on December 1 of each year in accordance with the follom mg schedule Installment Principal Year Amount f i 2004 $1,15 0,000 2005 313,000 2006 322,000 2007 329,000 The City Council finds that fixing the aboN e interest rates are in the best interest of the City. Interest on the Series A Bond will not be excluded from gross income of the Registered Owner for federal income tax purposes The lives of the respective capital facilities to be financed and refinanced with proceeds of the Bonds exceeds the term of the applicable Bond SECTION S - Bond Registrar, Registration and Transfer of Bonds. The Finance Director shall serve as Bond Registrar for the Bonds. The Bond Registrar 5038706906 7 LTGO Bonds, 2003, Series A, B and C shall keep, or cause to be kept, at its office in Kent, Washington, sufficient books for the registration and transfer of the Bonds (the "Bond Register"), which shall contain the name and mailing address of the Registered Owner of the Bonds. The Bond Registrar is authorized, on behalf of the City, to authenticate and deliver the Bonds in accordance with the provisions of the Bonds and this ordinance, to serve as the City's paying agent for the Bonds and to carry out all of the Bond Registrar's poNers and duties under this ordinance. The Bond Registrar shall be responsible for its representations contained in the Bond Registrar's Certificate of Authentication on the Bonds. The Bonds shall be issued only in registered form as to both principal and interest and shall be recorded on the Bond Register. The Bonds may not be assigned or transferred by the Bank, except that the Bank may assign or transfer the Bonds to any successor to the business and assets of the Bank i SECTION 6 - Pawnent of Bonds Installments of principal of and interest on the Bonds shall be payable in lawful money of the United States of kmerica and shall be paid by check, draft or warrant of the Bond Registrar mailed five days prior to the installment payment date to the Registered Owner at the address appearing on the Bond Register on the 15`i' day of the month preceding the installment payment date or by wire transfer or electronic debit to the Registered Owner on the installment 11 payment date. The Registered Owner shall present and surrender the Bonds at the office of the Bond Registrar in Kent, Washington, for cancellation promptly after the final installment of principal and interest on the Bonds, whether at matunty or upon j earlier prepayment and redemption, is paid by the City. Any of the Bonds presented and surrendered under this section shall be destroyed or cancelled in accordance with law. The City and the Bond Registrar may deem and treat the Registered Owner as the absolute owner of the Bonds for the purpose of receiving payment of principal and interest and for all other purposes, and neither the City nor the Bond Registrar shall be affected by any notice to the contrary other than proper notice of assignment or transfer • 503970 906 8 LTCO Bonds, 2003,Series A, B and C SECTION 7. - Optional Prepayment of Bonds. The City reserves the right and option to prepay all or any portion of the principal installments of the Bonds at any time prior to their stated principal installment payment dates at par plus accrued 1 interest to the date of prepayment, subject to the payment of a potential prepayment fee as described in the applicable Proposal Letter and upon fire days prior written notice given by the City to the Bank The City's notice shall specify the Bond to be prepaid, the prepayment date, the principal amount to be prepaid, and, for any partial prepayment, the pnnctpal installment or installments to which the prepayment is to be allocated. Interest on the principal amount of a Bond being prepaid shall cease to accrue on the dated fixed for prepayment unless the principal amount is not paid on the prepa}zrient date. SECTIONS - Failure To Put- Tnstallincias If any installment of f principal of and interest on any of the Bonds is not paid when due, the City shall be obligated to pay interest on that installment at the same rate provided in the Bond until that installment, both principal and interest, is paid in full or until sufficient money for its payment in full is on deposit in the Bond Fund and the principal represented by such installments has been called for payinent by giN ing notice of that call to the Registered Owner. SECTION 4 - Pledge of Taies For as long as any principal of the ' Bonds is outstanding, the City irrevocably pledges to include in its budget and levy taxes annually within the constitutional and statutory tax limitations provided by law without a vote of the electors of the City on all of the taxable property within the City in an amount sufficient, together with other money legally available and to be used therefor, to pay when due the pnncipal of and interest on the Bonds, and the full faith, credit and resources of the City are pledged irrevocably for the annual levy and collection of those taxes and the prompt payment of that principal and interest SECTION 10 - Form and Evecution of Bonds Each of the Bonds shall be prepared in a form consistent with the provisions of this ordinance and state law and shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk, either or both of whose signatures may be 505870c9 Ob 9 LTCO Bonds, 2003, Series A, B and C manual or in facsimile, and the seal of the City or a facsimile reproduction thereof shall be impressed or printed thereon. To be valid or obligatory for any purpose or entitled to the benefits of this ordinance, each of the Bonds shall bear a Certificate of Authentication in the following form, manually signed by the Bond Registrar: CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION This Bond is the fully registered City of Kent, Washington, Limited Tax General Obligation [Refunding] Bond, 2003, [Series A] [Series B] [Series C] [(Taxable)] [(Tax-Exempt)], described in the Bond Ordinance. i By Bond Registrar The authorized signing of a Certificate of Authentication shall be conclusive evidence that the Bond so authenticated has been duly executed, authenticated and delivered and is entitled to the benefits of this ordinance If any officer whose facsimile signature appears on the Bonds ceases to be an officer of the City authorized to sign bonds before the Bond bearing his or her jI facsimile signature is authenticated or delivered by the Bond Registrar or issued by the �I City, the Bond nevertheless may be authenticated, issued and delivered and, 'Allen authenticated, issued and delivered, shall be as binding on the City as though that person had continued to be an officer of the City authorized to sign bonds. The Bond also may be signed on behalf of the City by any person who, on the actual date of signing of the Bond, is an officer of the City authorized to sign bonds, although he or she did not hold the required office on the date of issuance of the Bond. SECTION 11. - Refividinje of the Refunded Bonds. A sufficient amount of the proceeds of the sale of the Series C Bond and other money of the City, if necessary, shall be deposited by the Finance Director to the credit of the bond fund for the Refunded Bonds and used by the City to discharge the obligations of the City related to 50367064 at 10 LTGO Bonds, 2003, Series A, B and C the Refunded Bonds under Ordinance No 3039 by providing for the payment of the amounts required to be paid by the Refunding Plan Any proceeds of the Series C Bond not needed to carry out the Refunding Plan and pay the costs of issuance of the Series C Bond shall be deposited in the Bond Fund to pay interest on the Series C Bond on the first interest payment date. SECTION 12. - Call for Redemption of the Refirnded Bards The City calls for redemption on January 13, 2004, all of the Refunded Bonds at par plus accrued interest Such call for redemption shall be irrevocable after the delivery of the Series C Bond to the Bank The date on which the Refunded Bonds are herein call for redemption is the first date on which those bonds may be called The proper City officials are authorized and directed to give or cause to be given such notices as I I required, at the times and in the manner required, pursuant to Ordinance No. 3039 in i order to effect the redemption prior to their maturity of the Refunded Bonds in accordance with the Refunding Plan SECTION 13. - Findings with Respect to Refunding The City Council of the City finds and finds and determines that the issuance and sale of the Series C Bond at this time will effect a sa,.ings to the City and is in the best interest of the Cit} and its taxpayers and in the public interest. In making such finding and determination, the City Council has given consideration to the fixed principal installment payment schedule of and the interest rate on the Series C Bond, the fixed maturities of and interest rates on the Refunded Bonds, the costs of issuance of the Series C Bond and the known earned income from the inN estment of the proceeds of the issuance and sale of the Series C Bond pending payment and redemption of the Refunded Bonds I I The City Council further finds and determines that the money to be deposited with the City for the Refunded Bonds in accordance with Section l l of this ordinance will discharge and satisfy the obligations of the City under Ordinance No 3039 with respect to the Refunded Bonds, and the pledges, charges, trusts, covenants, and agreements of the City made or provided for as to the Refunded Bonds, and that the Refunded Bonds shall no longer be deemed to be outstanding under such ordinance immediately upon the deposit of such money in the bond fund for the Refunded Bonds 5038706906 11 LTGO Bonds, 2003, Series A, B and C SECTION 14. - Presenviion of Tax Exemption for Interest on Tax-Erernpt Bonds The City covenants that it will take all actions necessary to prevent interest on the Tax-Exempt Bonds from being included in gross income for federal income tax purposes, and it will neither take any action nor make or permit any use of proceeds of the Tax-Exempt Bonds or other funds of the City treated as proceeds of the Tax- Exempt Bonds at any time during the term of the Tax-Exempt Bonds which will cause interest on the Tax-Exempt Bonds to be included in gross income for federal income tax purposes. The City also covenants that it will, to the extent the arbitrage rebate requirement of Section 148 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), is applicable to the Tax-Exempt Bonds, take all actions necessary to comply (or to be treated as having complied) with that requirement in connection with the Tax- Exempt Bonds, including the calculation and payment of any penalties that the City has elected to pay as an alternative to calculating rebatable arbitrage, and the payment of any other penalties if required under Section 148 of the Code to prevent interest on j the Tax-Exempt Bonds from being included in gross income for federal income tax purposes The City certifies that it has not been notified of any listing or proposed listing by the Internal Revenue Service to the effect that it is a bond issuer NNhose arbitrage certifications may not be relied upon SECTION 15 - Desiznatioi of Tar-Erenipt Bonds as "Qualified Tar-Erenipt iObligations. " The City has determined and certifies that (a) the Tax-Exempt Bonds are not"private activity bonds" within the meaning of Section 141 of the Code, (b) the reasonably anticipated amount of tax-exempt obligations (other than pnvate actn ity bonds and other obligations not required to be included in such calculation) uhieh the City and any entity subordinate to the City (including any entity that the City controls, i that derives its authority to issue tax-exempt obligations from the City, or that issues tax-exempt obligations on behalf of the City) will issue during the calendar year in which the Tax-Exempt Bonds are issued will not exceed $10,000,000; and (c)the amount of tax-exempt obligations, including the Tax-Exempt Bonds, designated by the City as "qualified tax-exempt obligations" for the purposes of Section 265(b)(3) of the Code during the calendar year in which the Tax-Exempt Bonds are issued does not 501870690y 12 LTGO Bands, 2003,Series A, B and C exceed $10,000,000. The City designates the Tax-Exempt Bonds as "qualified tax- exempt obligations" for the purposes of Section 265(b)(3) of the Code. SECTION 16. - Re tnidnigor Defeasance of the Bards. The City may issue refunding bonds pursuant to the laws of the State of Washington or use money available from any other lawful source to pay when due the principal of and interest on any of the Bonds, or any portion thereof included in a refunding or defeasance plan, and to redeem and retire, refund or defease such then-outstanding Bond (hereinafter collectively called the "defeased Bond") and to pay the costs of the refunding or defeasance If money and/or direct obligations of the United States of ,kmerica ` maturing at a time or times and bearing interest in amounts (together with money, if necessary) sufficient to redeem and retire, refund or defease the defeased Bond in accordance with its terms are set aside in a special trust fund or escrow account irrevocably pledged to that redemption, retirement or defeasance of the defeased Bond (hereinafter called the "trust account"), then all right and interest of the owner of the defeased Bond in the co%enants of this ordinance and in the funds and accounts obligated to the payment of the defeased Bond shall cease and become N oid The I owner of the defeased Bond shall have the right to receive payment of the principal of and interest on the defeased Bond from the trust account The defeased Bond shall be deemed no longer outstanding, and the City may apply any money in any other fund or account established for the payment or redemption of the defeased Bond to any lav ful purposes as it shall determine. �i SECTION 17 - Bond Fund, Project Fund and Deposit and Use of Bard Proceeds The Bond Fund is created and established in the office of the Finance I Director as a special fund designated the Limited Tax General Obligation Bond Fund, 2003 (Series A, B and C), for the purpose of paying principal of and interest and any prepayment fee on the Bonds. All taxes collected for and allocated to the pa)ment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds shall be deposited in the Bond Fund. A sufficient amount of the proceeds of the Senes A Bond shall be�kired on the delivery date of the Series A Bond by the Bank on behalf of the City to U S. Bank National Association to repay and retire the U S Bank Loan The remaining 50381%9% 13 LTGO Bonds, 2003, Series A, B and C proceeds of the Series A Bond shall be used by the City to repay the Water Fund for its internal financing of the Kent Station project and to pay costs of issuance allocable to the Series A Bond. All of the proceeds of the Series B Bond shall be deposited in the City's 2002 LTGO Projects Fund, previously created and established in the office of the Finance Director, and shall be used to carry out the Series B Project and pay costs of issuance allocable to the Series B Bond Until needed to pay those costs, the City may invest principal proceeds temporarily in any legal investment, and the investment earnings may be retained in the 2002 LTGO Projects Fund and be spent for the Series B Project. A sufficient amount of the proceeds of the Series C Bond shall be " deposited in the bond fund for the Refunded Bonds and used to carry out the Refunding Plan. The City shall use the remaining proceeds of the Series C Bond to pay costs of issuance allocable to the Series C Bond. SECTION 18. - Approvals Transactions The Bank has offered to purchase the Bonds under the terms and conditions provided in the Proposal Letters, which written Proposal Letters are on file with the City and are incorporated herein by this reference The City Council finds that accepting an offer by the Bank on substantially the same terms and conditions as set forth in the Proposal Letters is ui the City's best interest and therefore the City accepts such offer. This ordinance shall be deemed a covenant to comply with all terms and conditions set forth in the Proposal Letters. The City shall pay or reimburse the Bank for its legal expenses as provided in the Proposal Letter, not to exceed $500 for each separate series of Bonds Banc of America Securities LLC shall be paid a structuring fee in the total amount of $37,590 for the Bonds. The Bond will be prepared at the City's expense and will be delivered to the Bank, together with the approving legal opinion of Foster Pepper& Shefelman PLLC, municipal bond counsel of Seattle, Washington, regarding the Bond. 50387069 W 14 LTGO Bonds, 1003, Series A, B and C The proper City officials are authorized and directed to do everything necessary for the prompt sale and delivery of the Bond to the Bank and for the proper application and use of the proceeds of the sale thereof. i SECTION 19 — Severabilrty If any one or more sections, subsections, or sentences of this ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 20- E fectrve Date This ordinance shall take effect and be in force five (5) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law. I i JIM WHITE, MAYOR ATTEST• BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK � .APPROVED AS TO FORM i FOSTER PEPPER& SHEFELMAN PLLC Special Counsel and Bond Counsel PASSED- day of December, 2003 APPROVED day of December, 2003. PUBLISHED day of December, 2003 P mIi1MIMA\f 1 Iu Irlli`ne.N4 4 503870 906 15 LTGO Bonds, 2003, Series A, B and C CERTIFICATION 1, the undersigned, City Clerk of the City of Kent, Washington (the "City"), hereby certify as follows: 1. The attached copy of Ordinance No. (the "Ordinance") is a full, true and correct copy of an ordinance duly passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City held at the regular meeting place thereof on December 9, 2003, as that ordinance appears on the minute book of the City; and the Ordinance will be in full force and effect five days after the publication of its summary in the City's official jnewspaper; and 2. A quorum of the members of the City Council was present throughout the Imeeting and a majority of those members present voted in the proper manner for the passage of the Ordinance. J IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this _ day of December, 2003. CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON I� BRENDA JACOBER, City Clerk i P +J+MIM1AVIll l+ii M.�s Ub...VY4 5036706906 16 LTGO Bonds, 2003, Series A, B and C Kent City Council Meeting Date December 9, 2003 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE WRITE-OFF —APPROVE 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: The Washington State Auditor's office recommends that the City write-off uncollectible accounts that are over one year old. This year the write-off request is for $9,252.51 for accounts from 1992 through 2002 of miscellaneous Accounts Receivable, Utility Billing receivables and customer accounts. 3 EXHIBITS: Memo from Finance Director Miller • 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Operations Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 6L FINANCE May Miller, Director Phone 253-856-5260 41 KENT Fax 253-856-6255 W A 5 H I N G T G N Address 220 Fourth Avenue S Kent,WA 98032-5895 DATE: November 6, 2003 TO: Kent City Council Operations Committee,, FROM: May Miller, Finance Director THROUGH- Mike Martin SUBJECT: Accounts Receivable Write-Offs MOTION: I move to recommend authorization of miscellaneous Accounts Receivable, Utility Billing, and customer write-offs of$9,252.51 for accounts from 1992 through 2002. 4 SUMMARY: The Washington State auditor's office recommends that we write-off uncollectible accounts that are over one year old This }ear the write-off request is for$9,252 51 for accounts from 1992 through 2002 of miscellaneous Accounts Receivable, Utility Billing receivables and customer accounts BUDGET IMPACT: No impact and within Bad Debt Accrual Amount BACKGROUND: The total write-off for 2003 is $9,252 51 and includes Amount Reason Misc. Accounts Receivable 463.27 NSF/Out of State Utility Billing Accounts 6,95734 Bankruptcy Customer Accounts 1,83190 Process Failure (see attached) The total write-off amount is less than .003% of our receivables and is the lowest in manv years Kent Council Operations Committee l Accounts Receivable Write-Offs 2003 Write-offs ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE Write-offs: DATE CUSTOMER AMOUNT SERVICE 06-Mar-02 R & M Trucking (returned mail, no ph#) 20477 Rock spill clean up 07-Jun-02 Alexis Easterbrook-Lewis 5600 NSF check, Parks program 30-Jun-92 Security Pacific 14250 Not cost effective 27-Dec-02 David Brooks 6000 NSF check, Parks program Total A/R Write-offs: $463.27 UTILITY BILLING Write-offs: DATE CUSTOMER AMOUNT 1998 Gayden 8921 Bankruptcy 1998 Guy 5507 Bankruptcy 1998 Ezelle 24480 Bankruptcy 1998 Smith 92582 Bankruptcy 1998 Carr Auto Center 16056 Bankruptcy 199E H D Hotspurs 4,48886 Bankruptcy/Chapter 11 1999 Boston Market 2672 Bankruptcy/Chapter 11 1999 Boston Market 96630 Bankruptcy/Chapter 11 $6,957.34 CREDIT CARD Write-offs: DATE CUSTOMER AMOUNT 2002 Credit Cards/Golf Course 1,831 90 System processing issue ' $1,831.90 'This was an isolated instance at the Golf Course involving five days of credit card receipts Riverbend credit card sales totaling $ 21,380 39 were not credited to the bank account The city re-entered these transactions and recovered $19,548 49 of these funds The credit card dates had expired for$1,831 90 and this amount could not be recovered The City implemented corrective policies and procedures as well as provided employee training to resolve this matter These policies and procedures include daily verification of credit card transactions to the bank No other credit card problems has occurred since this initial problem ' 1 l 1 M o0 ^' CV W o }i CJ i N O O W - W rn r rn i y m rn i rn • CD O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 6} O O O O O O O L6 O L6 O V5 O Lf') M M N N r-- r- 69 H? 61D- 6g 603- Ef-> 6c� i `*- (901 ' O 61 m �6ZI -� `�6l 61 06) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o_ o_ o_ o_ o_ o w 0 0 0 0 0 0 CD M qct M N T--- f0- 641} 6cy fp} U> Ef} The City's A/R Collection Process 1. Invoices are marled throughout the month. Invoices are due 30 days from invoice date. 2. Each month, on or about the 15`h (fifteenth) of the month, a collection letter is sent out on each delinquent account. The letters vary in intensity based on the level of delinquency. If a phone number is available then the customer may be called. 3. If after several attempts we have still not received payment from the customer, the department that issued the invoice is notified. At this point the issuing department may write a letter or call the customer directly. 4. The Legal department is notified of delinquent invoices of significant amounts If the Legal department deems the invoice collectable, they may take the individual or company to court to recoup the invoiced amount or they may recommend transferring the account to a collection agency. 5. At the end of each month,a statement is sent out to all customers with account balances. Al Kent City Council Meeting Date December 9, 2003 Category Consent I SUBJECT: 2003 BUDGET ADJUSTMENT ORDINANCE- ADOPT 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Authorization is requested to approve the technical gross budget adjustment ordinance totaling $16,070,136 Ibr budget adjustments made between July I and December 31, 2003. The net amount, excluding transfers and inteinal service changes, is S8,483.996. This ordinance is primarily a housekeeping adjustment, consolidating individual budget items into one adjustment ordinance 3 EXHIBITS: Memo from May Miller, Finance Director 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Operations Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5 UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES X 6. EXPENDITURES REOUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councihnember moves, Councilmember seconds Di Sf i SiONT. ACTION Council Agenda Item No. FINANCE May Miller, Director Phone 253-856-5260 K E N T Fax 253-856-6255 w s ti i N G T o N Address 220 Fourth Avenue S Kent,WA 98032-5895 DATE: November 24, 2003 TO: Kent City Council Operations Committee FROM: May Miller, Finance Director THROUGH: Mike Martin ( SUBJECT: 2003 Second Half Budget Amendment - Ordinance MOTION: I move to recommend adoption of the 2003 Second Half Budget Adjustment Ordinance approving adjustments made between July I and December 31, 2003 totaling S16,070,136 and approving a line of credit in an amount not to exceed S200,000 to the housing and community development fund. SUMMARY: Authorization is requested to approve the technical gross budget adjustment ordinance totaling $16,070.136 for budget adjustments made between July 1 and December 31, 2003. The net amount, excluding transfers and internal service changes, is $8,483,996 This ordinance is primarily a housekeeping adjustment, consolidating individual budget items into one adjustment ordinance. Please note that $5,162,215 was previously approved by Council These 1 were primarily for projects 1 BUDGET IMPACT: BACKGROUND: Of the $10,907.921 not yet approved by Council, $7,518,000 is related to bonds to be issued as recommended by Operations on November 18 An additional $1.175,000 is to adjust the Special Assessments Budget to accommodate prepayments received and $249,873 is for increased auto parts usage by Fleet Services resulting from their aggressive preventive matntenance program Other items are largely reallocation of projects and routine recognition of project revenue as well as $375.000 for Engineering renovation with funds from Water, Sewer, Drainage, and CIP Approximately $2,661,000 of 2000-2002 LTGO Bonds savings m the Kent Station and parking garage projects are reallocated $1,400,000 to Transportation for 84`h Street rehab and 116`h Ave improvements due to loss of I-776 revenue for 2003-2004; $750,000 for facility safety improvements, and, $511359 for Public Safety improvements (primarily at Corrections) The bond savings resulted from Public Work's acquiring grants for the Kent Station and parking garage projects and from bond interest earned Kent Council Operations Committee 2003 2"d Half Budget Amendment-Ord Updated 12/2/03 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City of Kent, Washington, amending the 2003 Budget for adjustments made between July 1,2003, and December 31,2003,and authorizing a short term loan from the General Fund to the Housing and Community Development Fund (CDBG) to cover year-end I expenditures. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT,WASHMTON,DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: .I i SECTION 1. —Bud eQ t Ad1ustnrents The 2003 City budget is amended to include budget fund adjustments as summarized and set forth in Exhibit "A,"which is incorporated into this ordinance i SECTI&V 2. — Housine & Comnnuutr Development Fund— Short Term Loan. There is hereby established, as part of the 2003 budget, a short-term loan from the General Fund to the Housing and Community DeN elopment Fund (CDBG) in an amount not to exceed $200,000 to cover year-end expenditures. These funds may only be used as I needed Ij SECTION 3. — Severabdity. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance 1 2003 -Budget Adjustment- Second Hal SECTION 4. — Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force five(5)days from and after its passage,approval and publication as provided by law JIM WHITE, MAYOR ATTEST BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM- TOM BRUBAKER, CITY ATTORNEY i PASSED. day of December, 2003 APPROVED day of December, 2003 1 I PUBLISHED. day of December, 2003 �I i I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No pas by the City Council of the City of Kent,Washington,and appro-,ed by the Mayor of the Cat of Kent as hereon indicated. I I I (SEAL) BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK P Cmf.ORDINANCC,BudgnAdimim m 2003-2nddm 2 2003 -Budget Adjushnenl Second ZI City of Kent Budget Adjustment Ordinance Adjustments July 1, 2003 to December 31, 2003 Exhibit A Adjustment Fund Title Ordinance 001 General Fund 41,294 110 Street Fund (324,147) 130 Lodging Tax Fund (65,000) 140 Youth/Teen Fund 0 150 Capital Improvement Fund 406,852 160 Criminal Justice Fund 168,941 170 Environmental Fund 3 180 Housing & Comm Dev Fund 200,000 190 Other Operating Projects Fund (23,192) 210 Voted Debt Service Fund 0 220 Non-Voted Debt Service Fund 0 250 Spec Assess Debt Service Fund 1,175,000 310 Street Capital Projects Fund 1,446,387 320 Parks Capital Projects Fund 961,121 330 Other Capital Projects Fund 9,785,016 340 Technology Capital Projects 0 350 Facilities Capital Projects 1,500,243 410 Water Operating Fund 94,371 440 Sewerage Operating 213,647 480 Golf Operating (2,225) 510 Fleet Services Fund 249,856 520 Central Services Fund (32) 530 Fire Equipment Fund 160,000 540 Facilities Management Fund 37,001 560 Insurance Fund 30,000 620 Firefighters Pension Fund 15,000 680 Agency and Clearing Fund 0 701 Kent Economic Dev Corp 0 Total Gross Budget Change 16,070,136 Less Internal Service Funds 0 Other Transfers (5,136,670) Internal Transfers (2,449,470) Subtotal (7,586,140) Total Net Budget Change 8,483,996 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 o 0 0 m a o m o o o 0 cD 0 O a o o Y m e m fn I m o c7 0) r ry ao w 0 o co M 0 It 0 0 r I cri N M M O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N C"D o m o 0 0 0 � oo � o o o a co C) c wl E a0 a0 O O Cl) of O fl- N m N u7 O Q Of h C? m = t` O IT co O V O O C) O O O O m C) O < O n o 0 0 c7 O m O m o w N O N O O O N N O n O 1 N LO f` .N-- N L6 O Lci 6 V a A N N M O O O O O O O O O O 0 f- O O O r O O O O O O O ? Y O O LO N O N W N w e N n N 10 e O Yf cmcn r r r Go m cm c ra. c") m m O M M O N O 00 M O id O O O N O O N O , O O N L N N N N N 0 N -0N N o j O O O o N N ° � N C4 CD INC s. C C cm N N ()(O t') C 0 m d _ d tp0 O L 7 O O O L fCp C U O L n f0 ._. 7 (� .� (n Z - O do Yci ` Y a .n U u m O 0 0 cq ° 7 N LL C jo 0) O Ci o L. > a >o o U y ) .m p ° C O ° U d 2 O y T U = o V y m _°) a m o 0 = m 3 U E a 't c°o 3 a f0 E o 5 ° ° > ° E - co > > CO _� o = tD scq Y O ND (n m d U OU O C CL m > a)0UC7 En o Q ° y >. E a co CL IL w < p cc U g L o a o `m `o m Q a d o ° v 2. D D U U U o r- T v U o U o INC 0O C d 70 , C d }� > o 0 o O O o ` O o o a O > O ` 0 0 a 00 y O O O O o O a O O O O o d O G O 0 L o 0 0 0 0 o Q o 0 o z o d w Q _ o a N _ (V O u n E U. ? O t0 LL d T (7 V1 m IE E E o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N D m � 0 0 W 0 0 O O O O O 0 0) O O 01 O O co t0 10 N n O N C O O O O O O O O 0 m O O O O O LO O 0) w O O (d O Ocsi Coo LO N n N 0 0 0 a o 0 0 0 � o o O ci rn 0 co ui % vi o o co vi Cc t0 tq V U7 N N n a O O 00 IT 00 O O 00 to W) O CV O O) 10 O O (V ID IT <O cV O h C. cc N LLL 'Jm V C ca. L 7 d LL d p C C � _ E t LL y L > IV > v O 7 0 x es a - n o o E E a rn T 7 O) U Q T O 0) 0 U LL a C . U 0 E n o x 0 CM E o T c � E A a F U •a 1- U c rn 0 T t c a> Uu °o y w o c > o a 0 o > o c' w0 IL IL m w > U N 0)a N N Fo-T p >` O O O .0d T 0 13 U U o U d U j G 07 0 u7 c^O > n 0 v > o a o o a o 0 o 0 n o n o 0 0 00 0 0 Cl) a LL a Q z N .. 10 C N y O C pEj O LL > N o E 0 R ii IL n 'a T O ..+ E CL > > 53 c a a J t) rn m c H � U m L m a N c75 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C. 6 M OO o CO �' OO o a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ! 0 w 0 0 N v> ear c 0 0 OD a OD a 0 0 r r 5 O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o m O O O O O O O O O v O O O O N m M O O O (OD n O O r O (O O O N o O in a N m w 0 M Nf O O O f� O O Y 0 O r- 0) r 1., O co O O O O N N O N 0 (O m N N (D (D O 0) O O O C%ir of -: ch O O c0 11N LO O � � N O (O O O N O O to O N O w O 0) O O O O O r� v o o a o 0 r- am rr m 0 m c o O N D) N O N O (O m N N (D O N O O O r r (O P9 r O O aD ED O O c 1!7 (D (f1 { N') O r N C 00 ('7 O O m m Cl) N N N Ca Y. O O O O O O Cl) O O O O O O O O m m O O O O O m O N N N N N O O N O N N O N V a0 00 00 O C N N co N O -0 O N N N ^ o (D C C ID I LL O O ^ N O N O CN ca.d r r t0 01 r LL C U (0 > C O C C O 7 N ..�.. N C 7 '� E a LL d v 0 0 U E O U O L Q C C O O L C O C U O C (U t 00 00 ' d E E m 0 3 0 0 3 0 Cl) a E N o Z Z u a R N [ c 0) c > a m 0 0 o o E c m m 0 _ n d c u v o (n Q o T D d d o fO > (° `- u d > o m c c Q 3 N 0 M m m p u o 0 0 (ca (co > d U o W o m o `m =_ T O c c —y C7 C� �_ p a m > m m '0 m 3 a m 3 U ° n a 3 m c m E d d Z c 7 0 °' ° c 0 a = c m 0 t� 0 c (D � e(� m0. c> ma ` O N O o o a O 7 N U O o a O m N Cd j 0 UC1 O O C z z m O C ► < O 0 }U _ 41 w � E ' > ; cr d)a N 3 a E U O � � ao a oN U z Y Y o U_ FM- J U co) 200 200 O V U Z. . C > (") 01 (7 > > C1 > Ih 0 0 O) O c0 O O O O O r O O O O 9 0 O O o > O O V < (D co c0 co m o O 7 O a co ► O C > C1 - o O 0 0 0 0 O O O O a O O O O .. 0 a O y o a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a (D o 0 0 0 0 a � LL 10 a Z z z z z Z z z z a z z z z z a > a m a m o i� c o° o LL N ' E u o 0 0 q o U. 'a 2 Z p (OV O EEy V = N N 41 C N C N F� � O J C C C O O N � 6 U � E C a fn C? (7 C7 0 CD u •E > > o m c c c 0 m o O •% 2 v m m } = a a° a° (7 0 (i } a o a(`- 0 a u u u m E N r (' CD m m �a�. 0 O Fo- U r2 i 2 -1 0 H 1 U U q 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 v 0o rn m o 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o L6 o Li %6 o 0 c vi cp 01 co P— u> Cl r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m o o O o 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O L6 O Ld Ln O c O Ui r t0 r r O co A O C) r r O Of O O O O O O O O O r r O O O O O O O O O cn cn O Ln C N L6 O c O W N N O)i 00 0Cl) r N N O O O O O O O O (D 0) OI r r cl) e.) N N cc CC W � C O �j LLrL y i `O U_ G d 2 � N O !n I rn m v c 0 in > > > > ? > > > a o �' o c E O c ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ a ¢ ¢ < » � O 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o Q o o U 0 m U E Z U rn rn rn rn o 'arn D c d C 0 O > m m m 'a m m -0m h 4/ M O Q1 G/ d Ql N O N W O 0 Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q 0 0. 0 N 0 w 0 w O w ac T 6/to T O 7 U U U U U U U U u� o U 9 p c c c c c c c c � c U. LL G O 0 a N M LO O .dS O O V O Ln LOn 000 Ln Lo O o0 U Z > Z N N N N N N N N N N y a U o V C 1 o E cc m cc Q y d �+ G p N O YI ie Q m c � 'pO O 0 0 � �, ~ W U r14 co 0 m y r� ao PN7 1`m M rgi V M O E O O O O O O O 0 rn J J J J 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 n 0 m m IT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 co o 0 0 0 ao 0 0 M cD o 0 0 0 � r� u' co o o c m o 0 0 0 0 m 0 0 0 0 r� v_ v o o r )n 0 N O o co v rti o o r, rr r, o ri o v co pi o o N 0) O 1 V O O N m n N IT O 1-7 cc O O O O st a0 O O r) Co O O p O N co O O v w O O O O w C 0 0 o rn v v_ 0 0 rr rn 0 N o o m v r r,Lo o o , r- - o ri ro V7 a6 ai o o LCT cc N O) O V O O O N W r N 7 O 00 ma6b. M Cl) r) O v v v v O O O O 0 O m O � O O O N v a v < Q Q N 0 N N N N c mMIN cD (D O ''a v 70 'a LL d L O) 0) co 0 0 0 0 ` O C 0 y `m rn a a` L LL c W O` ' a c c c — c G m C9 t O Q) O O O O O U w N y N a) V I— ro m ` d O 7 7 7 c O a) d •- 0 N >. m m L L d 1] 0 LL y y05 y o Q M Cc a m O o o D o 0 D a > a p LL U � LL to 0 c N U U U U 0 co U X a t 'o c c c c v v m a L LL Cc a C 00 O O O O O > n OC J Oc J c0 c0 p C - a - 0) m m m m m o rA $ m o m m 7a 4)i o C� LL u rn m rn 0 o) o) o y m m v c OL 0 o m a ' a � L F- U 0 0 0 0 Q a. v o d o d o 0 a c m �. > m a a a a w 0) o) �. Y N a ¢ v`Li vWi o o m' m' m _ o 1, M > o r` mv m r` o o CD n 13 O o 0) O rn co rn �i • v o 0 rn 0 rn `S o 0 0 0 0 cD a o 0 0 0 o 0 o 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LL CX O) O C N 0) 0 0 O 0) O N N N O) O) O O � .�. d X a' w Q a' x a' a' 2 a' Z a' a' a' a: x Q of N V rl O a 5 N p n m c c c m m c c 0 d E w a $ E E =° aE y Q c W L - V p O 0 O O N w W 0 0 D Q O U o Qr a' 0a « n n a y E m n U E e U U 01 E d c CA m K cNv c -2 t L > E C c O O Q > O O C 0G m ° >U d QO rj Q in v m Q Q 0 )n Q o c Q c ry v c N Q Q c c r ro 1.V rf Y w N Ix N N N 2 r a W Y Y m .- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o '6 c 0o rn m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o r- o 0 0 0 o v 0 0 (O N 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r- 0 0 0 0 0 v r � LL07 N O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O O w 0 r 0 M O N 0 r 0 m v 0 O 0 7 O W O N O 0 0 O O 0 O 0 O 0 O 01 O t0 O N dC6 r O w r r O 0 O O O w 0 0 N O 0 O w O r O CO O r G r r N r (o (n O r O o aD o V O O CO aD O r x M Y N r N r f, LO N M La to W O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O r O 0 O N O r O V V lO 0 N V O O LO 0 0 0 0 O 0 a O CD O 0 O O 0 (O O r r O (D r r O O O 0) O (D (0 (O N O O O O O r O (O O C) r N r (O LA as r O O CO O O O O O N O C M (O r r N r f` (0 O O M r LO m V N r N W co Cl) M CO 0 o f� o 0 o M M O M M M o M O M o M 0 Cl) 0 O o 0 0 0 o O� N 0 N O N O O O O N O O O O a O O O N O (r c N mo N N N N O N C N C C r m LL O T O O 0 O O O O r ca LP 116 co w w M CO C O L O d t a` 0 m `) m Y 7 d — d y a E °� ° D v, D a a�i a m CL w ° a E � � u L m � 0 ° � v 0 c U m 2 .71 n E m >mm. Ch m ( a U) c d o a m Y n M 0 J N O t0 J ry N U N 3 d 'OO U p o p >� a X d o y a LL O X m O O c O o 7 m 7 0 N - C m 0 C a U o > a� = j � (D c J ma� IO - W mmai O a m a > W C C Oc) a c a ro � m (7o 0 0 o c m o m o 8 o aa o O m m w 2 > > > cC co i U 7 m a y .0 -D a) m N c Q oa m IL) a> > 0 U d 2+ fL LL N Y ¢ — H a U d' x w w U O ♦- U Y Cf f- O/ W > :1 Cl) co N N r M CO r M O m O N > N 0 (n O r " 0 (n (n to M O r N N N CO Cl) M V V r O N M V r V V v Q 0) 1 O a c 'j O O O O O O O O O O 0 O O O a O O O. O O O O N 7 to o 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 o 0 0 �+ O O O O O LL N N N N N N N N N N N N N M N N N N N N O N N N " N a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a z a a a a a (a cf 0 o n 0 IL = _ � Y N in g 8 S 2 y m c N E E E : a EEm m y U ° o E V m rg n no o o Lo -0 V O8 ` (n (n a s rnE c m 4 . a S S 0 Y L' a (Y a s m5- A d m O 2 o a 0 c ¢ ¢ C A m ¢ c L m 0 °' d G a (L Y y L Z _m x a 'O m a a X O N X X d ` 0 F m N T a O C O N O N J _ _ N O O 1 r1 J Z m 0 o 2 J J a p S J r a = = a a O "L "i O O A y J E N - L O E YI C N N C N m m v a m m m m rn v m m m o m m m n m o oa a n a ¢ Q c� O f- z w D_ a J Q U W a Y w w D J } o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 cc ° a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o n o (h to O V O C) C O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O M O O O O O o 0 O O O o O o O o O 0 CD 0 n O e'f )D O V O O) O O Cc, (O O) M a) O O to O O O O M M O 00 0 O O O O r- R w O O 1 O O O O V O o O O n O O O o n (n (O O O O 0 (O (n N N n 0 n e- (D Ln 'T n (O aO e0 e0 N Ld O e0 - to C N O < M O) M (D N M M M ao n (O M (D (� O O o) M O) Cl) (O 1, M N M M (O n or; o O O (n O M 0 0 0 (o O O O O M M 0 0 0 O 0 O o O n v w 0 O o O o O `? O O O O o '- n N (O O o O O )O (O N (V (O (O v7 n (D aD c0 aD (n )fi O (D 17 )n O T M o) M to N M M Cl) m (- N Cl) (D Co co Q M m co Ln n M N M r- M (O n m � N ca � O O O O 0 O N O O O N C O O) 7 .� N N N I LL it CA O C O C 7 a) a M LL O ` a, a v a m O eaco o O t N a a ma `m cc c a� aa)) u ayi U c u °1 u u d A 0 c a d O O N a`) (L N (A C 7 'O W LLto _ 4r (D O U :: > °1 0 O al o o 1 a y y V `c v> m CO U E w m (q U) U E E m •C C� O O a O LL 0 O a a LL a a (L ` u a rn 3 a O ~ w C C O a M !O a a > 00 O O O O > > O O m m 0 m m m m C O 0 4)) mO O OO 0 O O G C — 0. C N g m p CO > co u d o m o o 0 0 o C - w m m m y m m m (a �+ E N N a o m m > > m d m a > > a) a) a) a a o U i= o m m x m m m o a a a a a c) o u a > n (n (o 04I to to (. n CO a>i (D v to (D N > N N . C Q 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 o 0 a o 0 a 0 0 0 ., 0 0 0 0 0 0 y .. 0 0 0 0 0 a o — o o )y m N N N O N N N N N N _ _ Q Z y Z LL LL LL LL LL v Q v Z a o N O p C N a LL. o Y _ C Jm a m m re vi a n n U a r.+ o (D ) m Vi W N 0 O r 6. V y Ur Ur O a c c 0 0 0 0 `o m (i a` a` a a a 3 F N y N y U co p p m m m [D [D a m at d m ��. M (r9 0 o o o u u u u u F- H F- H H F- (O m m m m m 1 ■i M J 0 J J J J J J M LL LL LL LL LL O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c m m 00 01 O (O O of O O N h co> 4D N N O O O 10 N O N r h O Cl) CO) 40 0 co N O cV co 0) O 0! N O N 06 01 O co O N < V N N N ..�, O O O O O O O O O O O O O m Of O t0 O t9 O O N h m co N N O 0) O to N O N r n Ln f7 ri 7 O O co N O N co co .- .- O Oi N O N O) 01 .- O O O O IT n{ .- N (V 01 v to O r, N O N h M to N N O co a) O r n O M m n O O �o N N cu co r Ch r O cl N N Q) 0) IL N r O r It V N N N cm o co o o c 0 00 00 0 0 0 0 0 n h 0 0 r� r> o c 7 N N O O C N O W o0 0 0 0 0 N N C) N N p tt O O 0 1 9 9 L j N O c_ 7 N 7 N c N LL O ... co "' '�- cn �.. N O (DD N t4t L Im L to y :Eta.! O L Vi co LL qT(n O ° L 43 O .0 CL V ° o 3 0 — a at `0 3 — o m o 3 m L o 3 y n rn c o a� m a m e c�pp o. A CD c (n `m rn A Tc of H4f c7 H coOO 0 5. O m° O 7+ 0 a, U v ato If E Q o 0 ° 0 O a yd o Voum U ci a H u ° c _ m m Q a O 1.O f — wM O 0 0 O N u c rn nJ c LL c c - a _ c cm c 0o R > c 0 o M o c (U Q m w U �. c U n r y U ,, E d » y 0. E a) �, a 0 E a o w o ° � a 0 0 o o a) a o o " a ° U to o U a v U o F 9 U o S y U o C 0 C o 0 a 0 0 o a 0 L o a o o0 o no00 a 00 o nN n co a Q o Z v v Q v Z v Q U) z n o Q Ln N c O o C C LL A LL m a V 0 am a Z fA o 0 d c 0 U � U CD, 0 0 0 in v 'W) o 0 0 0 0 0 O o O o S m cc 0 00 Q' m a O O O O O O O N O O O O K O O h d m 19 M N C O O O O O O C. O O O CD 4Y O O O O O O O N O O O O cn O O I If9 C7 [!7 M I M N LO cow O O O O O O O O r C C I7 1�'f CO7 M r r O u r r O +� t0 r pp O 0 O V1 O O O O O O O O 1 O O h A r r N � n f") r EC N C Ii O 0� O O N ON O O LL C N y 7 C LL OC C 5 E C 2 N E ° LL d E d ° LL Q d `m rn d c c c ¢ t w — > m c° = 7 i A 3 ° Ci o q U A g u _ _ U t LL U 3 a c LL C LL >. > 3 >. U c m � d E � v a � O cc O U o C A a) R N a a g u es > c �+ m G ` a y >. E m m v Y'S % d r LL M U o C o C to N 07 > > O M o >° d > Oo c > o a 0 °L O a 0 a` cv w ` O a O ° CO c ° `� IL LLa $ z Ln z LL cc n C d C N C o > N LL ° N c cILE a o ti r u o d R 100 C LL LL C C LL H a � jC9 aC2 ID N �i N lL V lL N w • Kent City Council Meeting Date December 9, 2003 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT— SCHOOL DISTRICTS' CAPITAL FACILITIES PLANS ORDINANCE — ADOPT 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Adoption of Ordinance No. relating to CPA-2003-3, which amends the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive plan to include the amended Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent and Federal Way School Districts, and which includes for the first time the Auburn School District's Capital Facilities Plan. 3. EXHIBITS: Ordinance and cover page of its referenced exhibits. Complete copies of the school district plans are available for perusal in the City Clerk's Office. • 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Operations Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc ) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 6N i ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, amending the City of Kent Comprehensive Plan to amend the Capital Facilities j Element of the Comprehensive Plan to include the Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent, Federal Way, and Auburn School Districts (CPA-2003-3). i I ' I I WHEREAS, the Washington State Growth Management Act ("GMA") requires internal consistency among comprehensiN e plan elements and the plans from I other jurisdictions, and WHEREAS,to assure that comprehensi\e plans remain releN ant and up to date, the GMA allows amendments to the capital facilities element of comprehensive Plans concurrently with the adoption or amendment of a city budget RCW 36.70A 130(2)(111)); and WHEREAS,the City of Kent has established procedures for amending the Comprehensive Plan in chapter 12.02 of the Kent City Code, allowing amendment of the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan concurrently with the adoption or amendment of the City budget and allowing the City Council to hold the public hearing instead of the Land Use and Planning Board, and WHEREAS,the Kent and Federal Way School Distncts have submitted i proposed amendments to their Capital Facilities Plans to be included in an amendment of the City's Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan; and 1 Comprehensive Plan Amendments School Districts'Capital Facilities Plans i WHEREAS, the Auburn School District has submitted its Capital Facilities Plan to the City for the first time to be included in an amendment of the City's Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS,after providing appropriate public notice,the City Council of the City of Kent considered the requested comprehensive plan amendment and conducted a public hearing on the same on September 16, 2003; and i I I WHEREAS, on August 20, 2003, the City provided the required sixty (60) day notification under RCW 36.70A 106 to the state of Washington of the City's proposed amendment to the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the sixty (60) day notice period has lapsed; and WHEREAS,on December 9, 2003, the City Council for the City of Kent approved the Capital Facilities Element amendment CPA-2003-3 to include the Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent, Federal Way, and Auburn School Districts, as set forth in Exhibit "A" attached and incorporated by this reference (CPA-2003-3), NOW, ' THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. -Amendment. The Capital Facilities Element of the City of Kent Comprehensive Plan is hereby amended to include the Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent,Federal Way,and Auburn School Districts,as set forth in Exhibit"A"attached I and incorporated by this reference (CPA-2003-3) 2 Comprehensive Plan Amendments School Districts'Capital Facilities Plans SECTIONZ -Severabilih. If any one or more sections,sub-sections,or sentences of this Ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid,such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect. SECTIONS. -Effectrve Date This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days from and after the date of passage as provided by law. I JIM WHITE, MAYOR ATTEST ' BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM TOM BRUBAKER, CITY ATTORNEY PASSED day of 2003 APPROVED day of , 2003. PUBLISHED day of 2003. I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No. ,passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the City of Kent as hereon indicated. it (SEAL) BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK P\C1%d,0RD1NANCE CompPlanAmend schoalDisinns CapaalFxdmcsPlms_'oo3 dm 3 Comprehensive Plan Amendments School Districts'Capital Facilities Plans EXHIBIT "A" r i A � _ fix, ti g 2003 — 2004 - 2006 - 2009 VU Liu �OCu M Et a � lit, I � j .1 OEM Emmld Park EIe Lary Site Emerald Park Elememary School Emcnld Park E.lema wy Serving `unincorporated King County and Kent, Covington, Auburn, JKapfe `vaffey, O£ackOiamond, 1�nton, Sea7ac, Washington Apri[2003 I 1 Federal Way Public Schools � � 2003/04 � Capital Facilities Plan 0 � � s i r i i i � Buildingfor the 21s' Century I r� V AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2003 through 2009 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT "Avenue to Excellence" Serving Students in: Unincorporated King County Unincorporated Pierce County City of Aubum City of Algona City of Pacific I Adopted by the Auburn School District Board of Directors May 12, 2003 Kent City Council Meeting Date December 9, 2003 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: REVISIONS TO KENT CITY CODE CHAPTER 12.13 — SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT FEES ORDINANCE—ADOPT 2 SUMMARY STATEMENT: Adoption of Ordinance No. relating to CPA-2003-3, which amends the school impact fee schedule contained in section 12.13.160 of the Kent City Code to reflect changes in the Kent and Federal Way School Districts' Capital Facilities Plans, and includes for the first time the Auburn School District's Capital Facilities Plan. 3. EXHIBITS: Ordinance 4. RECOMMENDED BY: (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) I 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES_ I 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 60 I ORDINANCE NO. l AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington,amending Section 12.13 160 of the Kent City Code to amend the school impact fee schedule (CPA-2003-3). i WHEREAS, the City of Kent adopted a school impact fee program as authorized by the Growth Management Act and RCW 82 02 050; and j i WHEREAS, chapter 12.13 070 of the Kent City Code requires that the Capital Facilities Plans of the school districts be submitted to the City of Kent on an annual basis for City Council review, and that such rev jew shall occur in conjunction with any update of the Capital Facilities Element of the City's Comprehensw e Plan, and WHEREAS,the Kent and Federal Way School Distncts ha\e requested amendments to the text of the Comprehensive Plan to reflect proposed chagges to 1 impact fees, and WHEREAS, the Auburn School District has submitted its Capital Facilities Plan to the City for the first time to be included in an amendment of the City's Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan, and i WHEREAS, on August 20, 2003, the City provided the required sixty (60)day notification under RCW 36.70A.106 to the state of Washington of the City's proposed amendment to the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan,and l School Impact Fee-2003 WHEREAS, the sixty (60) day notice period has lapsed; and WHEREAS,after a public hearing before the City Council on September 16, 2003, the City Council on December 9, 2003, approved Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA-2003-3 to include the Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent, Federal I� Way,and Auburn School Districts, which include changes in proposed impact fees as follows. Federal Way School District decrease to S3,269 00 for single-family and decrease to $940.00 for multifamily units; Kent School District increase to S4,292 00 for single-family and increase to S2,643 00 for multifamily; and Auburn School Distnct establish $4,528.00 for single-family and $1,212.00 for multifamily; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to amend section 12.13.160 of the Kent City Code to reflect the Comprehensive Plan amendment that established a new base fee schedule for the Federal Way School District of $3,269 00 for single-family and $940 00 for multifamily units, for the Kent School District of$4,292 00 for single- family and S2,643.00 for multifamily,and for the Auburn School District of S4.528 00 for single-family and $1,212 00 for multifamily; NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHIMTON, j DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS. SECTION1. -Amendment. Section 12 13.160 of the Kent CityCode is hereby amended as follows. Sec. 12.13.160. Base fee schedule. The following fee shall be assessed for the indicated types of development. School District Single Family Alulti-family 1llulti-family studio Kent, No. 415 $4,147 9A $2,554 00 $ 000 $4,292.00 $2,643 00 Federal Way, No. 210 $3,865 00 $1,886 00 $ coo $3,269.00 $ 94000 Auburn, No 408 $4,528 00 S1,212 00 $ 0 00 2 School Impact Fee-2003 II . SECTION -Severabrhn If anyone or more sections,subsections,or sentences of this Ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect. i SECTION3. -Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law. JIM WHITE, MAYOR ATTEST. BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: TOM BRUBAKER, CITY ATTORNEY 1 PASSED. day of 2003 APPROVED- day of 2003. PUBLISHED day of 12003. I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No 1 passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the City of Kent as hereon indicated. (SEAL) BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK P�Cml ORDINANCE%Sah.11mp.(20U3 do 3 School Impact Fee-2003 Kent City Council Meeting Date December 9, 2003 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: 2003 ANNUAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT ORDINANCE —ADOPT 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Adoption of Ordinance No. relating to the 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendments CPA-2003-4(A), CPA-2003-4(B), and CPA-2003-4(C), which amends the comprehensive plan land use designations for property more specifically identified in the Ordinance. 3. EXHIBITS: Ordinance and its referenced exhibits 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Council • (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: S SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 6P i ORDINANCE NO. r AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, amending the City of Kent ' Comprehensive Plan as follows: (1) to change the land use map designation from Single Family, three (3) units per acre (SF-3), to Single Family, six (6) units per acre (SF-6) for property located at 21907 1001h Avenue Southeast (CPA-2003-4(A)), and (2) to change the land use map designation from Single Family,six(6)units per acre(SF-6), to Neighborhood Services(NS)for property located at 11525 SE 240'`' Street (CPA-2003-4(C)) f i I WHEREAS, the Washington State Growth Management Act ("GMA") requires internal consistency among comprehensive plan elements and the plans from other jurisdictions; and I I I WHEREAS,to assure that comprehensive plans remain relevant and up to date,the GMA requires each jurisdiction to establish procedures w hereby amendments to the plan are considered by the city council (RCW 36 70A 130(2)), and limits these amendments to once each year unless certain circumstances exist, and WHEREAS, the City of Kent has established a procedure for amending the Comprehensive Plan in chapter 12 02 of the Kent City Code,which sets a deadline of September Ist of each year for submittal of requests for comprehensne plan amendments, and WHEREAS, the City received three(3)timely applications to amend the comprehensive plan's land use plan map designation, and those applications involve 1 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendments parcels located at: (1) 21907 100`h Avenue Southeast (CPA-2003-4(A)), (2) 11644 SE 2401h Street (CPA-2003-4(B)); and (3) 11525 SE 240`h Street (CPA-2003-4(C)), and WHEREAS, the parcel at 21907 1001h Avenue Southeast is currently designated Single Family Residential, three(3)units per acre(SF-3),and the applicants are requesting a plan designation to Single Family Residential,six(6)units per acre(SF- 6) (CPA-2003-4(A)); and WHEREAS, the parcel at 11644 SE 240`h Street is currently designated Single Family Residential, six (6) units per acre (SF-6), and Neighborhood Services (NS), and the applicants are requesting a plan designation of Neighborhood Services (NS) (CPA-2003-4(B)); and WHEREAS, the parcel at 11525 SE 240`h Street is currently designated Single Family Residential,six(6)units per acre(SF-6),and the applicants are requesting a plan designation of Neighborhood Services (NS) (CPA-2003-4(C)), and WHEREAS, the City of Kent Land Use and Planning Board considered I CPA-2003-4(A), CPA-2003-4(B)and CPA-2003-4(C), conducted a public hearing of the same on October 27, 2003; and made the following recommendations: the conditional approval of CPA-2003-4(A), denial of CPA-2003-4(B), and denial of CPA-2001-4(C). and WHEREAS, he proposed amendments of CPA-2003-4(A) and CPA- 2003-4(C) are consistent with the standards of review for comprehensive plan amendments outlined in section 12.02.050 of the Kent City Code; and i WHEREAS,on November 18,2003,the City Council for the City of Kent approved the comprehensive plan amendment CPA-2003-4(A) to amend the comprehensive plan designation for the parcel of property located at 21907 100`h Avenue Southeast with the condition that approval is contingent upon completion and recording 2 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendments of storm water and open space tracts on the subject site consistent with the approvals of the Kara Crest and Cofield Subdivisions; and WHEREAS,on November 18,2003,the City Council for the City of Kent denied the comprehensive plan amendment CPA-2003-4(B) for the parcel of property located at 11644 SE 2401h Street; and WHEREAS,on November 18,2003,the City Council for the City of Kent approved the comprehensive plan amendment CPA-2003-4(C) to amend the comprehensive plan designation of the parcel of property at 11525 SE 2401h Street on the follow mg conditions (i) that if Russ Hanscom, of Arbor Village Assisted Living, or its assocrate(s),can purchase the property, no later than March 15,2004,and develop it as a senior oriented public park in perpetuity,then the property land use designation w ill not jbe amended,(n)that if that proposal described in(i)aboN e fails,the land use designation will amend to Neighborhood Services(NS)effective at midnight on March 16,2004,and (ni) that if an altematn e park project different from (i) above is proposed by Russ Hanscom, the City Council must %ote on that proposal before midnight on March 16, 2004; and WHEREAS on September 12 2003,the City ProN ided the required sixty I (60) day notification under RCW 36.70A.106 to the state of Washington of the City's proposed amendment to the Comprehensn e Plan, and WHEREAS, the sixty (60) day notice period has lapsed; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: 3 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendments SECTION 1. - Amendments The City of Kent Comprehensive Plan adopted by Ordinance No. 3222, as subsequently amended, is hereby amended to establish new land use designations for the following parcels: A. For the property located at 21907 100 Avenue Southeast, from a plan designation of Single Family three (3) units per acre (SF-3) to a plan designation of Single Family six units per acre(SF-6),as depicted in the map attached as Exhibit "A" and incorporated by this reference (CPA- 2003-4(A)), with the condition that approval is contingent upon completion and recording of storm water and open space tracts on the PP subject site consistent with the approvals of the Kara Crest and Cofield J Subdivisions; and B. For the property located at 11525 SE 240`h Street from Single Family six (6)units per acre (SF-6)to a plan designation of Neighborhood Services (NS),as depicted in the map attached as Exhibit"B"and incorporated by this reference(CPA-2003-4(C)) with the follow ing conditions. (i) that if Russ Hanscom, of Arbor Village Assisted Living, or its associate(s) can purchase the property,no later than March 15, 2004, and develop it as a senior oriented public park in perpetuity, then the property land use designation will not be amended, (n)that if that proposal described in(1) aboN e fails, the land use designation shall be amended to Neighborhood Seri ices (NS) effective midnight on March 16, 2004, and (ui)that if an i alternative park project different from (i) above is proposed by Russ Hanscom, the City Council must vote on that proposal before midnight t on March 16, 2004 SECTION2. -Sererabiliti• If anyone or more sections,sub-sections,or sentences of this Ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or im alid,such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect SECTION3. -Ef(ecave Dare This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days from and after the date of passage as pro,ided by law. JIM WHITE, MAYOR 4 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendments I ATTEST: BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: TOM BRUBAKER, CITY ATTORNEY PASSED day of , 2003 APPROVED day of . 2003 ' PUBLISHED day of 2003 I I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordnance No ,passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the City of Kent as hereon indicated. i (SEAL) BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK I P Cial ORDI\ANCEC..,PlenAm d 2003 J« I I 5 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendments W Vl V p C •�• � 0 aLpi r C Z �; 00 r0 W . �' °�' L. m a > N cy 0 rf y c 3 ` 3 y y Y u O c c O y cm d r r ° �" E zo z -0000r c � � � °Nm > o m LLr a (D rn c v a a �a . v► 3 o vc V 0. V , a N L lU L c cE �. o 1 C O V) O > MO 00 C c0 . W 1 O Q - AjunoZ) 6w)q paleiodjoowun j> - _ M _ S_3AV 66 0 0 V - - L6 cn U.�1d66 L r- S 3Ad 96 'e'a. � N N _ N E L d /J�L� �� r—J YU l 6 , a PKIV i ( �� C L` 96PLS EL Nc a a T 1 J N N CO _ Ur L;lC N r, V/ ❑ S1d96 Y � S Id b6 � , lit T W ' aM o, o � a 3 � 3a c°� v 0' C � LAI O m IV G N cc a � 3 v fLL F 61 a L � io 3 V c V a V a 3S 3nd oz�.. ... Ln C) rn ELL LL _ - C O W - V L co - - 19S3nesLl C- F N — 3SldtgL cn 3SldbLL - 3S ld : EFx Is rFaB L- _ 0M L L E- Ui(V Lr vieq g• j � m •� ��� � u —� - �-�_r . - " -- r2 a �� p .gas" • Kent City Council Meeting Date December 9, 2003 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: 2003 ZONING IMPLEMENTATION ORDINANCE - ADOPT 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Adoption of Ordinance No. relating to zoning map changes CPZ-2003-2, CPZ-2003-3, and CPZ 2003-4, which amends zoning map designations for property more specifically identified in the ordinance. 3. EXHIBITS: Ordinance and its referenced exhibits I I • 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Council E (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) I 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES_ 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: S SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION. ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 6Q ORDINANCE NO. I � III AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, amending the Kent Zoning Map to change the zoning designations as follows: (1) from Single Family, 3 63 unit per acre (SR-3), to Single Family, 6.05 units per acre (SR-6) for property located at �I 21907 100'" Avenue Southeast (CPZ-2003-2); and (2) from Single Family, 6.05 units per acre (SR-6), to Neighborhood Convenience Commercial (NCC) for property located at 11525 SE 2401h Street (CPZ-2003-4) I � �I WHEREAS, pursuant to the «'ashington Growth Management Act I ("GMA"), the City of Kent accepts applications for comprehensi%e plan amendments once each year, and I WHEREAS, the City of Kent received applications to amend the comprehensive plan's land use map designations, and three (3) of those applications involve properties requesting corresponding area wide amendments to the zoning map designation of parcels with the folloti ing addresses (1) 21907 100°i Avenue Southeast (CPZ-2003-2); (2) 11644 SE 240" Street(CPZ-2003-3), and (3) 11525 SE 240'' Street (CPZ-2003-4), and WHEREAS,the City of Kent Land Use&Planning Board held a public hearing on the proposed comprehensive plan and zoning map amendments on October 27,2003,and made the following recommendations: the conditional approval ofCPZ- 2003-2, the denial of CPZ—2003-3, and the denial of CPZ-2003-4; and 1 2003 Zoning Amendments WHEREAS, on November 18, 2003, the Kent City Council made the following decisions on the zoning amendments. A For the property located at 21907 100`h Avenue Southeast, approve a zoning designation amendment from Single Family, 3.63 units per acre (SR-3),to a zoning designation of Single Family, 6.05 units per acre(SR- 6), as depicted in the map attached as Exhibit"A-I"and incorporated by this reference (CPZ-2003-2), with the condition that the approval is contingent upon completion and recording of storm water and open space tracts on the subject site consistent with the approvals of the Kara Crest and Cofield Subdivisions; and B. For the property located at 11644 SE 240`h Street, deny a zoning designation amendment from Single Family, 6 05 units per acre(SR-6), to a zoning designation of Neighborhood Comemence Commercial (NCC) (CPZ-2003-3); and C. For the property located at 11525 SE 240`h Street, approve a zoning designation amendment from Single Family, 6 05umts per acre(SR-6),to a zoning designation of Neighborhood Convenience Commercial(NCC), as depicted in the map attached as Exhibit"B-l"and incorporated by this reference (CPZ-2003-4) with the following conditions: (i) that if Russ Hanscom, of Arbor Village Assisted Living. or its associate(s) can purchase the property, no later than March 15, 2004, and develop it as a senior oriented public park in perpetuity, then the property zoning designation will not be amended, (u) that if the proposal described in (i) above fails, the zoning designation shall be amended to Neighborhood Conti enience Commercial(NCC)effectn e midnight on March 16. 2004. and (ill) that if an alternative park project different from (i) above is proposed by Russ Hanscom,the City Council must vote on that proposal before midnight on March 16, 2004, and jWHEREAS, on September 12, 2003, the City provided the required sixty(60) day notification under RCW 36 70A.106 to the state of Washington of the City's proposed amendment to the zoning designations; and WHEREAS, the sixty (60) day notice period has lapsed, NOW, THEREFORE, 40 2 2003 Zoning Amendmieuts THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION]. -Amendment The City of Kent zoning map is amended to establish a new zoning map designation for the property located at 21907 1001h Avenue Southeast, Kent,Washington,and legally described on the attached Exhibit "A,"from a zoning designation of Single Family,3 63 units per acre(SR-3),to Single-Family,6 05 units per acre (SR-6), as depicted in the attached Exhibit "A-1," incorporated by this reference,with the condition that approval is contingent upon completion and recording of storm water and open space tracts on the subject site consistent with the approvals of the Kara Crest and Cofield Subdivisions; and. SECTION2. -Amendment The City of Kent zoning map is amended to establish a new zoning map designation for the property located at 11525 SE 2401h Street, Kent, Washington, and legally described on the attached Exhibit "B," from a i zoning designation of Single Family, 6.05units per acre(SR-6). to a zoning designation of Neighborhood Convenience Commercial (NCC). as depicted in the map attached as Exhibit"B-I"and incorporated by this reference, with the follo�N mg conditions (i)that if Russ Hanscom,of Arbor Village Assisted Ln ing,or its associate(s)can purchase the property no later than March 15, 2004 and deg elop it as a senior oriented public park in perpetuity, then the property zoning designation w ill not be amended, (ii) that if the l proposal described in (i) above fails, the zoning designation shall be amended to jNeighborhood Convenience Commercial (NCC) effectiN c midnight March 16, 2004, and(in)that if an alternative park project different from(i) above is proposed by Russ Hanscom, the City Council must vote on that proposal before midnight on March 16, 2004(CPZ-2003-4); SECTION 3. -Severabilin, If anyone or more sections,subsections,or sentences of this Ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect. ' 3 2003 Zoning Amendments SECTION4. -.Effective Date This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty(30)days from and after the date of passage and publication as provided by law. JIM WHITE, MAYOR ATTEST: BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK I APPROVED AS TO FORM: TOM BRUBAKER, CITY ATTORNEY �I PASSED day of 2003 .I j APPROVED day of 12003. I PUBLISHED day of 2003. I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No. passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the City of Kent as hereon indicated. (SEAL) BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK P%Cnd OBUINANCEZmmngMapAmcnd 2007 duc 4 2003 Zoning Amo dments � 1-Ut-IELU AMENDMENT NV-2003-31/KIVA#2032637 CPA-2003-4(A)/CPZ-2003-2/KIVA 2032620 (William Osborne, Planner) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 2, CITY OF KENT SHORT PLAT NO. SP-99-1, RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 19991122900001; SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. SECTION: 07 TOWNSHIP: 22N RANGE: 05E 1 .I' •f �+ — ,:,.. Otto " OLm ]sd i 7 r 11 t„•, iA - I I0 t® ` v trI . ]n .[ ti -- --- K I Pm ei RCN P i I �) , d ' KE SP-99.1 19991122900001 ' O y 1 eoa,- i ('i. }� �I � • 8 I 11 �.. LOT 17 D' LOT 2 1 ly - "as. ow ill t•yr,.t..J. 1 t ifrE• . .»w•� a i .[ 1 I Totµ. u7a,.• i tua. ,>,.. °® I ,� •l�.ia rre.!•^p.� - ii ieS?;��il evi.—.. "K ''r.—_--•— — I �+ri�-Si E� -� :R �,n-a• � a♦r �t LO L� .tf•A-IG 6U .Y _. 1 ( vt n —+• ; 71 ,rfa. ]� 1]�_ ]3• 71'. ]D 11- 11II�a dtaw 'kit,— S.M. ii•o- �un. •w• a•m, , 1 •, 40,E 0310 a @0 aim msa 0210 �. w , i1 A, .,. I KCst 10850" i 2 31 .ao:fa. •b ' $ 220TH ST• '•IC I L El0/0101]] I 1 ... r ' a O •trA f a» • - r»!. r a " a iiSS •a,'4J r 1 1A ai 37 •�� ^-' �gl 11 xis b of ajs � �,•� o'a��t �. i tan .�.a •7zY• 9 {la ,�. 11' 1 asm ]: 0 = I I lOOD DNA. i• i , CDT, . Im , H 00A ®0 w0 PO 21;t,w• + r =f pllp fo r i. a ' 127 r G • �' .. 8' 3. •• ^12...tftot WI. • , ! ax 02 0 w ' uaor to I •/� i R m10 yr. ftx. c OJa: 7�_ oae0 13 MOOtuo• 9rl d 0 I M70 �1 1�y %•r• a w )1 fJ • 000 i.' >cw en-!s•,f[ �_ to '' 0010 rte O1 23-t,.e.+ '�� ; „f J, I . `. 16., CL30. mD • f i� i 11 ;r 1 ' $)i ayi 0010 060 n , 0110 �� 22 •tin. I i i ni is T1 A S aTo 4 p' •e „a ! EXHIBIT "A" N 4! i' C C7 r a L o g r� 0 �, N o d d A c M 3 ` 3 a _'m v _u c c c R A v L M U G► A � N O OaO+ Ow O N W z 0 N L c a ,� c m u. o r w ••, o y � r m a w3c n 0 s " V fLL u.. v» cn 3 Uc U U N - W LI C LJ rrl ` ��, ti [,;r` C Cl) - ❑ o o� ` Q to -- • c/) 0 > S= o 1 •— U) 0 m CL Ja N _ Q ui r�i ' V)i Alunoo 6wN palejodioowun - - N S 3A 1 LO 00 -cn - S 3AV 86 - 7 N - (� N m ? �. N °a PRIV r V/ L i_I_—' F �7 aj LN r L Lq} _ r r I S ld S6 E E ®r S1d46 The northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 20, Township 22 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington; EXCEPT that portion thereof conveyed to the City of Kent by deed recorded under Recording Number 8812130026. i i EXHIBIT "B" y c z L L O O c7 v o ;; aJ s+ i, u o O W r `' JO m O � N C N aM �, � � J1 3v " Y 0 3 �+" � c a JJJ z v, N ,� > d O mM � M J41 ° r °a E ��. m a ._. 3 u f JL f a Jn vJ 3 V c a 3S 3nd ozl......_ - oi CY) --- _ t � Z o > W O = Omono CL - - co �• -_ _ M 3nd s l l N g r , co c : S Id bll [ 4D` 3S Id t, _ ELi . . . s£ - '3S Id £l(n € ua a F{3 5 _CL r o OE LL oa WU �(U11 At, '--' is �! � � � � �� i� �' ❑ � ,� • Kent City Council Meeting Date December 9, 2003 Category Consent Calendar i 1 SUBJECT: PINERIDGE FINAL PLAT —APPROVE i 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Approve the final plat mylar for Pmendge #FSU-2001-10, and authorize the Mayor to sign the mylar. 3. EXHIBITS: Staff memo, map and Hearing Examiner Conditions of Approval I i 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Community Development Dept. Staff • (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc ) I 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: S SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 6R COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Fred N. Satterstrom, AICP, Director PLANNING SERVICES KEN T Charlene Anderson,AICP, Manager W A 5 MI MGT DM Phone 253-856-5454 Fax 253-856-6454 Address 220 Fourth Avenue S Kent,WA 98032-5895 DATE: November 24, 2003 TO: MAYOR IIM WHITE, COUNCIL PRESIDENT JUDY WOODS AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: CHARLENE ANDERSON, AICP, PLANNING MANAGER THROUGH: MAYOR JIM WHITE SUBJECT: PINERIDGE FINAL PLAT (4FSU-2001-10/KIVA #2032710) MOTION: Approve the final plat mylar for Pincridge '"FSU-2001-10 and authorize the Mayor to sign the mylar SUMMARY: Randy Goodwin proposes to subdivide approximately 4 76 acres into twenty-seven (27) single-family residential lots The property is located north of SE 234`h Street, approximately 600 feet east of 116`h Avenue SE BUDGET IMPACT: None BACKGROUND: On January 30, 2002, the Hearing Examiner issued a Findings and Decision granting preliminary approval of a 27-lot single-family residential subdivision, with 21 conditions The applicant has complied xi rth the conditions required prior to recording S \Pernut'Tlan\longplats,,2001\2032710-2001-10cc DOC Enclosure Conditions of appro�al— Hearing Examiner 1 0310 I I-_ II V J o0so 1 0l00 1 olio 1 013o i i :: �` I 1 I r 1`. 0080 I I i 1 0140 0150 ( R6 1 R6 r IN 84'14'52� wR6 330,§8' R6 i R6 I 0170 ( 0180 ( 0190 I 71" 60; '50 50'50' 50' SO' . o / m ,19 ,E n 18` o17m 160 15m M I I 1 14 -� 71' i "'°4 SJ 50' 0' I' t 1' 37 .35' 20 1 146'R z-TRAC D o ii I I 94' d3 1 - - 111 l a i 14 50' - 96'—"I i I •Ni 100' ^50'1 - 22 ( , o 0 100' 1 10 - n 0 240 inn, 0 I I ( I -R6-—-L - N - o , 23 I N I o al 39 R6 ( 57 2 •, ry a,w 11 7,,,,t R I I ! .aR So - o y R6 �26� - I lso' 50' S0 I I I R6 88 1 36 --50' R f 5 I I SPAC _' m ` .� .4 0 --------1r--------- 1 1 TRACT i 1 ih 10,131 sq!f r I ?O'35' I 1 - I 50' TRACT A ,' • DETENTION. - 3. 8 1 1 m 2 a 3 0 I 1 I '73, r I ` •1 � 1 R6 . - _' 85 1 74 l 1 1 1 S0'• — i H 89R041 33093 ;nL� t — —————————————— I 2 R6- APPLICATION NAME: PINERIDGE KING COUNTY#LO1P0008 REQUEST: #ENV-2001-64 KIVA 42013917 #SU-2001-10 KIVA #2013919 SITE MAP North PINERIDGE #FSU-2001-10 KIVA #RPP5-2032710 King County File #L01 P0008 r On January 30, 2002, the City of Kent Hearing Examiner approved the Pinendge Preliminary Plat with the following conditions 1. Compliance with all platting provisions of Title 19 of the King County Code 2. All persons having an ownership interest in the subject property shall sign on the face of the final plat a dedication that includes the language set forth in King County Council Motion No 5952 3 The plat shall comply with the base density and minimum density requirements of the R-6 SO zone classification. All lots shall meet the minimum dimensional requirements of the R-6 zone classification or shall be as shown on the face of the approved preliminary plat, whichever is larger, except that minor revisions to rthe plat which do not result in substantial changes may be approved at the discretion of the Department of Development and Environmental Services i 4 The existing structures on lots 7 and 25 shall maintain appropriate setbacks from h the new property lines consistent with KCC 21A 12 030 5. All construction and upgrading of public and private roads shall be done in accordance with the King County Road Standards established and adopted by Ordinance No 11187, as amended (1993 KCRS) 6. The applicant must obtain the approval of the King County Fire Protection Engineer for the adequacy of the fire hydrant, water main, and fire flow standards of Chapter 17.08 of the King County Code 7 Final plat approval shall require full compliance with the drainage provisions set forth in King County Code 9 04 Compliance may result in reducing the number and/or location of lots as shown on the preliminary approved plat Preliminary review has identified the following conditions of approval which represent portions of the drainage requirements All other applicable requirements in KCC 9.04 and the Surface Water Design Manual (SWDM) must also be satisfied during engineering and final review a. Drainage plans and analysis shall comply with the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual and applicable updates adopted by King County. DDES approval of the drainage and roadway plans is required prior to any construction Pineridge #FSU-2001-10 KIVA#RPP5-2032710 Conditions of Approval b. Current standard plan notes and ESC notes, as established by DDES Engineering Review, shall be shown on the engineering plans. C. The following note shall be shown on the final recorded plat: All building downspouts, footing drains, and drains from all impervious surfaces such as patios and driveways shall be connected to the permanent storm drain outlet as shown on the approved construction drawings # on file with DDES and/or the King County Department of Transportation. This plan shall be submitted with the application of any building permit. All connections of the drams must be constructed and approved prior to the final building inspection approval. For those lots that are designated for individual lot infiltration systems, the systems shall be constructed at the time of the building permit and shall comply with plans on file " d. The stormwater detention facility for this project shall meet the Level 2 Flow Control requirements in the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual(KCSWDM). e. A stormwater adjustment(L01V0050) was approved for this project All conditions of approval for this adjustment shall be met with the submittal of the engineering plans. 8. A detailed significant tree retention plan shall be submitted consistent with KCC 21A.38.230 with the engineering plans at the time of engineering review No clearing of the subject property is permitted until the final tree retention plan is approved by LUSD. Flagging and temporary fencing of trees to be retained shall be provided, consistent with KCC 21A 38.23064. The placement of impervious surfaces, fill material, excavation work, or the storage of construction materials is prohibited within the fenced areas around preserved trees, except for grading work permitted pursuant to KCC 21A 38.230B4d(2). A note shall be placed on the final plat indicating that the trees shown to be retained on the tree retention plan and shall be maintained by the future owners of the proposed lots, consistent with KCC 21A.38.230B6. The tree retention plan shall be included as part of the final engineering plans for the subject plat 9. The following road improvements are required for this subdivision to be constructed according to the 1993 King County road Standards (KCRS) Page 2 of 7 Pinerid #FSU-2 e FSU-2001-10 KIVA#RPP5-2032710 Conditions of Approval a. Road A shall be improved at a minimum to the urban subaccess road I standard b FRONTAGE. The frontage along Southeast 2341h Street shall be improved to the urban neighborhood collector standard i C. Tracts C and D shall be improved as private access tracts per Section i 2 09 of the KCRS. Lots 13 through 16 shall have undivided ownership of Tract D and be responsible for its maintenance A note to this effect shall be placed on the engineering plans and final plat d Tracts E and G shall be improved as joint use driveways per Section 3 01 of the KCRS. Lots 18 and 19 shall have undivided ownership of Tract E and be responsible for its maintenance Tract G may be improved as a k joint use driveway for lots 26 and 27 This will require Lots 26 and 27 to f have undivided ownership of Tract G. A note to this effect shall be placed on the engineering plans and final plat I e. Tract F shall be improved as a paved public pedestrian walkway in accordance with the KCRS The location of the pedestrian tract shall be coordinated with the adjoining plat of Birdsong Meadows LOOP0011 A minimum 4-ft high fence is required on both sides of the walkway f Modifications to the above road conditions may be considered according to the variance provisions in Section 1 08 of the KCRS There shall be no direct vehicular access to or from SE 234" Street from those lots which abut it A note to this effect shall appear on the engineering plans and final plat. 10 All utilities within proposed rights-of-way must be included within a franchise approved by the King County Council prior to final plat recording. 11 The applicant or subsequent owner shall comply with King County Code 14 75, Mitigation Payment System (MPS), by paying the required MPS fee and administration fee as determined by the applicable fee ordinance The applicant has the option to either. (1) pay the MPS fee at final plat recording, or (2) pay the MPS fee at the time of building permit issuance If the first option is chosen, the fee paid shall be the fee in effect at the time of plat application and a note shall be placed on the face of the plat that reads, "All fees required by King County Code 14.75, Mitigation Payment System (MPS), have been paid." If the second option is chosen, the fee paid shall be the amount in effect as of the date of building permit application Page 3 of 7 Pineridge #FSU-2001-10 KIVA#RPP5-2032710 Conditions of Approval 12. Lots within this subdivision are subject to King County Code 21A 43, which Imposes impact fees to fund school system Improvements needed to serve new development. As a condition of final approval, fifty percent (50%) of the Impact fees due for the plat shall be assessed and collected Immediately prior to recording, using the fee schedules in effect when the plat receives final approval The balance of the assessed fee shall be allocated evenly to the dwelling units in the plat and shall be collected prior to building permit Issuance. 13. Preliminary plat review has identified a small isolated Class III wetland on the site. This wetland is exempt from regulation per KCC 21A 24.350. 14. A suitable recreation space shall be provided consistent with the requirements of KCC 2 1 A 14.180 and KCC 21A.14.190 (I e., sport court[s), children's play equipment, picnic table[s], benches, etc.). As proposed the recreation tract is about 400 square feet smaller than the required 10, 530 square feet for a 27-lot subdivision. A fee-in-lieu of recreation space may be acceptable subject to approval by the King County Parks Division The amount of the fee shall be determined by the King County Park System, consistent with the provisions of KCC 21 A.14 185. a An overall conceptual recreation space plan shall be submitted for review and approval by DDES, with the submittal of the engineering plans, This I plan shall include location, area calculations, dimensions, and general improvements including landscaping in accordance with KCC 21A 16 Requirements. The approved engineering plans shall be consistent with the overall conceptual plan. b A detailed recreation space plan (i.e., landscape specs, equipment specs, etc ) consistent with the overall conceptual plan, as detailed in item a , shall be submitted for review and approval by DDES and King County Parks prior to or concurrent with the submittal of the final plat documents. c A performance bond for recreation space improvements shall be posted prior to recording of the plat. d A homeowners' association or other workable organization shall be established to the satisfaction of DDES which provides for the ownership and continued maintenance of the recreation, open space. 15. Street trees shall be provided as follows (per KCRS 5 03 and KCC 21A 16 050): Page 4 of 7 Pineri #FSUdge FSU-2001-10 KIVA#RPP5-2032710 Conditions of Approval a. Trees shall be planted at a rate of one tree for every 40 feet of frontage along all roads Spacing may be modified to accommodate sight distance requirements for driveways and intersections. b Trees shall be located within the street right-of-way and planted in accordance with Drawing No 5-009 of the 1993 King County Road Standards, unless King County Department of Transportation determines that trees should not be located in the street right-of-way. c If King County determines that the required street trees should not be located within the right-of-way, they shall be located no more than 20 feet from the street right-of-way line. d The trees shall be owned and maintained by the abutting lot owners or the homeowners association or other workable organization unless the County has adopted a maintenance program Ownership and maintenance shall be noted on the face of the final recorded plat e The species of trees shall be approved by DDES if located within the right- of-way, and shall not include poplar, cottonwood, soft maples, gum, any fruit-bearing trees, or any other tree or shrub whose roots are likely to obstruct sanitary or storm sewers, or that is not compatible with overhead utility lines f The applicant shall submit a street tree plan and bond quantity sheet for review and approval by DDES prior to engineering plan approval g The applicant shall contact Metro Service Planning at 684-1622 to determine if SE 2341h Street is on a bus route If SE 234th Street is a bus route, the street tree plan shall also be reviewed by Metro h The street trees must be installed and inspected, or a performance bond posted prior to recording of the plat If a performance bond is posted, the street trees must be installed and inspected within one year of recording of the plat. At the time of inspection, if the trees are found to be installed per the approved plan, a maintenance bond must be submitted or the performance bond replaced with a maintenance bond, and held for one year After one year, the maintenance bond may be released after DDES has completed a second inspection and determined that the trees have been kept healthy and thriving i A landscape inspection fee shall also be submitted prior to plat recording The inspection fee is subject to change based on the current County fees Page 5 of 7 Pineridge #FSU-2001-10 KIVA#RPP5-2032710 Conditions of Approval 16. A well appears to exist within the boundaries of the proposed subdivision The exact location of the well and 100-foot radius shall be shown on the engineering plans. The well shall be properly abandoned and plugged according to the specifications listed in Chapter 173-160 of the Washington Administrative Code (WAC) The final engineering plans approved by LUSD shall also indicate that the Washington State Department of Ecology shall be contacted prior to construction. 17. The existing easements along the north property line of the site and the one along the east property line of Tax Lot 51 shall be relinquished prior to the engineering plan approval. 18. The following have been established by SEPA as necessary requirements to mitigate the adverse environmental impacts of this development The applicants shall demonstrate compliance with these items prior to final approval Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) has identified a High Accident Corridor (HAC) on SR 515 which will be impacted by this development. WSDOT currently is programming a project to install traffic signals in response to the HAC condition To mitigate the project's impact, WSDOT has requested that the developer pay an impact fee toward the signalization program The applicant has agreed to enter into a Voluntary Settlement Agreement to pay the impact fee OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: 1 The subdivision shall conform to KCC 16.82 relating to grading on private property. 2 Development of the subject property may require registration with the Washington State Department of Licensing, Real Estate Division 3 Preliminary approval of this application does not limit the applicant's responsibility to obtain any required permit or license from the State or other regulatory body. This may include, but is not limited to the following• a Forest Practice Permit from the Washington State Dept. of Natural Resources. Page 6of7 ineri . #FSU-ge #FSU-2001-10 KIVA#RPP5-2032710 Conditions of Approval b. National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit from WSDOE C. Water Quality Modification Permit from WSDOE d. Water Quality Certification (401) Permit from U S Army Corps of Engineers. ch S Term it\PIanllongplatslroutings\2032710-fsu-2001-10conditions doc Page 7 of 7 Kent City Council Meeting Date December 9, 2003 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: ALVIN'S POND FINAL PLAT —APPROVE 2, SUMMARY STATEMENT: Approve the final plat mylar for Alvin's Pond #FSU-97-3, and authorize the Mayor to sign the mylar 3. EXHIBITS: Staff memo, map and Hearing Examiner Condition of Approval 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Community Development Dept Staff • (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 6S COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Fred N Satterstrom, AICP, Director PLANNING SERVICES KE N T Charlene Anderson,AICP, Manager ""S"'""°" Phone 253-856-5454 Fax 253-856-6454 Address 220 Fourth Avenue S Kent,WA 98032-5895 DATE: November 24, 2003 TO: MAYOR JIM WHITE, COUNCIL PRESIDENT JUDY WOODS AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: CHARLENE ANDERSON, AICP, PLANNING MANAGER THROUGH: MAYOR JLM WHITE SUBJECT: ALVIN'S POND FINAL PLAT (#FSU-97-3"KIVA #2032565) MOTION: Approve the final plat mylar for Alvin's Pond #1`SU-9 7-3 and authorize the Mayor to sign the mylar SUMMARY: W E Ruth Real Estate proposes to subdivide approximately 2 93 acres into thirteen (13) single-family residential lots. The property is located at 26003 108`h Avenue SE BUDGET IMPACT: None i BACKGROUND: On August 19, 1998, the Hearing Examiner issued a Findings and Decision granting preliminary approval of a 13-lot single-family residential subdivision, with 25 conditions The applicant has complied with the conditions required prior to recording S \Pernut\Plan`,longplats\2032565-FSU-97-3cc DOC Enclosure Conditions of approval—Hearing Examiner City of Kent - \Planning Department S E Z60TH 5TiA !S' Y£ ♦ .� l�]] Yll 1 KI II}' N6CP tl�_ T I \ Z # ±A..,[- -..Fl Ai n �{ �� I � i • N ^ . r� • nn _ —__ �u Y u.m APPLICATION NAME: Alvin's Pond NUMBER: FSU-97-3 DATE: November 25, 2003 REQUEST: Preliminary Plat LEGEND Application site Site Plan ALVIN'S POND #SU-97-3 KIVA #XPLN-3700 On August 19, 1998, the Hearing Examiner recommended approval of the Alvin's Pond preliminary plat On October 20, 1998, the City Council approved the preliminary plat with the following conditions. A. PRIOR TO RECORDING THE SUBDIVISION: 1. The Owner/Subdivider shall receive approval for engineering drawings from the Department of Public Works,and shall either construct or bond for the following: a, A gravity sanitary sewer system to serve all lots. The public sewer system on Southeast 260' Street may not be deep enough E to service the lots lying south of the creek. Therefore, a sewer extension from f the existing City system located approximately 600 feet south of the subject property along 108'h Avenue Southeast may be required The final approved I sewer system shall be sized to serve all off-site properties within the same service area. In addition,the sanitary sewer system shall be extended across I the subdivision as needed to serve adjacent properties. I The septic system serving the existing home within the proposed plat shall r be abandoned in accordance with King County Health Department r Regulations. b A water system meeting domestic and fire flow requirements for all lots. Any existing well(s)shall be abandoned in accordance with the requirements of the Department of Ecology. C. Detailed Drainage Plans which show how the 100-year post-developed stormwater runoff from this development will be collected, conveyed,stored, treated,and released to the City's stormwater drainage system in compliance with the City of Kent Construction Standards (1) The Owner/Subdivider shall construct an on-site detention/retention pond system in accordance with the Kent Construction Standards to mitigate for potential impacts to stormwater runoff quantity and quality. The detention/retention storage volume and release criteria shall be that for the HILLS; the pre-development condition shall be assumed to be forestigrass only unless otherwise determined by the Director. Hearing Examiner Findings and Recommendation Alvin's Pond #SU-97-3 i (2) No portion of the public stormwater management system may be constructed within wetlands or wetland buffers. (3) An infiltration pond retention system is the preferred alternative for mitigation of stormwater impacts and this alternative shall be required 1 unless proven unfeasible by the Owner/Subdivider in the submittal for the Detailed Drainage Plans. (4) Roof downspouts for each lot(house and garage)shall be directed to Roof Downspout Infiltration Trenches, or Perforated Stubouts, meeting the requirements of the Department of Public Works, including overflow pipes connected to an approved conveyance system. The Detailed Drainage Plans shall include an approved detail for the Roof Downspout Infiltration Trenches, or Perforated Stubouts, and shall provide private stormwater stubouts to each lot for future connection from the Roof Downspout Infiltration Trenches, or Perforated Stubouts. The face of the recorded plat shall contain the following restriction: AS A CONDITION OF BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE, RESIDENCES CONSTRUCTED ON LOTS OF THIS SUBDIVISION MUST PROVIDE ROOF DOWNSPOUT INFILTRATION TRENCH (OR PERFORATED STUBOUT) SYSTEMS PER DETAILS SHOWN ON THE APPROVED STORMWATER PLANS. (5) The required downstream analysis for this development shall include an analysis for capacity,erosion potential, and water quality from the point of discharge from the site downstream a distance of at least one- quarter mile or to the point where stormwater discharges to the maintained portion of the City of Kent stormwater drainage system, whichever distance is farther. (a) This downstream analysis shall identify clearly the existing and future capacity of each link in the drainage system for the specified downstream reach. Hearing Examiner Findings and Recommendation Alvin's Pond #SU-97-3 (b) The Owner/Developer shall identify all elements in the specified downstream reach that cannot convey the 100-year, 24-hour design storm without overtopping or pressure flows. (c) In addition,should downstream capacity of any element in the downstream reach be insufficient to convey the 25-year, 24- hour peak flow rate, the Owner/Subdivider shall either provide necessary off-site improvements to convey the 1 year,24 hour design pear fip nv shall U1 dcr detain/retain stormwater and restrict the release rate of stormwater to ensure that the capacity of the existing conveyance system will not be exceeded. (d) Similarly, should an erosion problem be exacerbated by the proposed release conditions, then the Owner/Subdivider shall further restrict the release of stormwater from this development,or shall provide suitable off-site mitigation. (6) The Owner/Subdivider shall execute Declaration of Stormwater Facility Maintenance Covenants prepared by the Property Management Section of the Department of Public Works for the private portions of the drainage system d. An open-to-the-air stormwater treatment system in accordance with the requirements of the Kent Construction Standards to mitigate for potential impacts to stormwater runoff quality. Acceptable stormwater treatment facilities meeting this requirement in their preferred order include. infiltration after pretreatment; biofiltration swales; wet ponds; extended detention ponds; and created wetlands. Alternatives and experimental treatment facilities will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis by the Department of Public Works. (1) The stormwater treatment system shall be within approved retention/detention facility iract(s) (2) Easements for biofiltration swales across private lots will not be acceptable to meet this requirement. (3) No portion of the stormwater treatment system may be within wetlands or wetland buffers. Hearing Examiner Findings and Recommendation Alvin's Pond #SU-97-3 e. A Detailed Grading Plan for the entire subdivision which includes provisions for utilities, roadways, retention/detention ponds, stormwater treatment facilities, and a building footpad for each lot. These plans shall be designed to eliminate the need for processing several individual Grading Permits upon application for Building Permits: phasing of grading on a lot-by-lot basis will not be considered. f A Temporary ErosiorvSedimentation Control Plan iur Uie entire subdivision that reflects the Detailed Grading Plan discussed above, and the Planning Department approved Tree Plan. g A full width widening/improvement of 108'Avenue Southeast, designed in conformance with the requirements for a Residential Collector Arterial Street augmented with Bike Lanes as described in the City of Kent Construction Standards. The Street Improvement Plans for this street shall include,but are not limited to the following: combined cement concrete curbs & gutters and 10-foot cement concrete sidewalks on the west side of the street; a minimum of 36 feet of asphalt pavement as measured from the east edge of pavement to the face of curb on the west side of the street; a maximum gradient of 12 percent;a normal crown for the asphalt street located at the center of the right of way; a City-approved street lighting system; public stormwater conveyance, detention and treatment facilities; street markings; traffic signs; water and sewer lines; and other street related appurtenances These Street Improvement Plans also shall reflect the following: (1) To provide minimum safety facilities in the vicinity of the creek crossing,these plans shall include barrier guardrails on both sides of the street. On the west side of 108"Avenue Southeast,this guardrail shall generally extend along the entire length of Tract C; on the east side of 108"Avenue Southeast,the guardrail shall extend as far north and south of the creek banks as the existing driveways will permit. (2) The asphalt pavement width shall be tapered to the south at the transition rate of 1:40 to match the existing edge of pavement on both sides of the street. (3) Channelization and traffic sign plans which include provisions for a minimum 200-foot-long left turn lane at the intersection with Hearing Examiner Findings and Recommendation Alvin's Pond #SU-97-3 Southeast 260" Street and for"NO PARKING ANYTIME'signs on both sides of the street. (4) Curb returns at both intersections shall be designed in conformance with the City's South 212' Street Curb Return Detail, which incorporates the Bike Lane ramp requirements. (5) The total minimum width of asphalt pavement specified above shall be designed and cnnctCucre i to prcvidc a n7awinum 20-year service life. The Owner/Subdivider shall provide the Department of Public Works with a Pavement Analysis Report to determine the adequacy of the existing asphalt pavement, and the minimum depth for an asphalt overlay required to provide a 20-year service life for the existing pavement. The Pavement Analysis Report shall be consistent with Part II and Part III of the AASHTO GUIDE FOR DESIGN OF PAVEMENT SECTIONS,published by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 1986 edition, or latest revision, and the Pavement Analysis Report shall provide all of the necessary information required by this pavement design guide and the City of Kent Construction Standards h. Pedestrian Walkway Improvements for a 6-foot-wide gravel walkway from Southeast 260' Street to Southeast 264' Street constructed on the east side of 108'Avenue Southeast south to tie into the asphalt pavement pedestrian improvements constructed by the City at Southeast 264' Street to serve Meadow Ridge Elementary School. At the sole discretion of the Director of Public Works the Owner/Developer may pay a proportionate share of the costs of said pedestrian walkway improvements versus constructing same. i. Street Improvements for the relocated subdivision street terminating with a cul-de-sac at its west terminus. The Street Improvement Plans for this subdivision street shall be designed in conformance with the requirements for a Residential Street as described in the City of Kent Construction Standards, including but not limited to: combined cement curbs & gutters and 5-foot- wide cement sidewalks on both sides of the street;at least 28 feet of asphalt pavement(a reduction in the standard width to reduce impacts to the adjacent wetlands); a City-approved street lighting system; public stolmwater drainage, detention,and treatment facilities;curb return radii of 35 feet at the Hearing Examiner Findings and Recommendation Alvin's Pond 4SU-97-3 intersection of the subdivision street and 108'Avenue Southeast; horizontal curve radii of at least 200 feet; and a 45-foot minimum radius to the face of curb for the cul-de-sac. The 5-foot cement sidewalk shall not be installed where the public street abuts the Sensitive Area Tract for the wetlands and creek(another reduction in the standards to reduce impacts to the adjacent wetlands). j. The two private streets and the access tract/easement for Lots 12 and 13 shown on the face of the revised Prnli:ninary Plat cad snail provide a minimum asphalt pavement width of 20 feet and shall be within an easement having at least 22 feet of width. The face of the final plat shall show clearly which lots may have access to each private street. In no case shall more than four lots be permitted to have access onto a private street k Street Light Plans meeting Street Lighting Requirements shall be prepared and installed by a qualified professional engineer licensed by the State of Washington.. 1. Wetland Mitigation Plans for any and all work within the wetlands or wetland buffers. Wetland Mitigation Plans shall show how the Owner/Subdivider has minimized all wetland impacts by an analysis of alternatives that would avoid the impact altogether, as required by KCC Section 11.05.120. 2. The Owner/Subdivider shall submit Landscape Plans for within and surrounding the retention/detention facility to the Planning Department AND to the Department of Public Works for concurrent review and approval prior to,or in conjunction with, the approval of the Detailed Drainage Plans. 3. If determined necessary by the City following hydraulic analysis by the Owner's engineer,the existing culvert for the creek crossing of 108'Avenue Southeast shall be removed and a new culvert shall be installed meeting the City's design criteria. The culvert shall be designed to applicable standards for a fish-bearing stream, UNLESS the Department of Fish and Wildlife states in their HPA or in their written waiver therefrom that this work is not needed. If the City determines that a new culvert is necessary, the City will work with the Owner/Subdivider for sharing the costs thereof. 4. The Owner/Subdivider shall obtain an HPA or a written waiver therefrom,prior to any on-site construction. Hearing Examiner Findings and Recommendation Alvin's Pond 4SU-97-3 5. The Owner/Subdivider shall retain the location of the proposed plat street intersection with 108'Avenue Southeast as shown on the revised preliminary plat that meets the minimum separation distance of 300 feet required for an offset tee intersection on a Residential Collector Arterial. 6. The ownerldeveloper shall submit for review and approval by the Planning and Public Works Department a tree plan for the general site, for the roadway, and for uu inu;vwuai tors showing all trees six inches in d:a^.:eter yr grcaici, dllU their relationship to any proposed structure and other smaller trees. Approval and construction of the final roadway design and issuance of approved Grading, Temporary Erosion/Sedimentation Control Plans,or development permits for any lot may not occur prior to approval of the tree plan by the Kent Planning and Public Works Departments. No trees of a six-inch caliper or greater shall be removed from any lot except pursuant to a tree plan approved by the Planning Department Appropriate mitigation,including the replacement of trees at a greater than 1:1 ratio, shall be required if any significant trees are to be removed Grading Plans cannot be approved without an approved Detailed Tree Plan. T The Owner/Subdivider shall grant a Sight Distance Easement across the subdivision frontage on 108'Avenue Southeast, at the intersections with the plat street and the access tractleasement to lots 12 and 13. The approved Sight Distance Easements shall be based upon a 40 MPH design speed and shall be surveyed and marked with permanent survey monuments. The following RESTRICTION shall appear on the face of the approved plat: SIGHT DISTANCE EASEMENT/RESTRICTION THE SIGHT DISTANCE EASEMENT SHOWN HEREON IS GRANTED TO THE CITY OF KENT FOR PUBLIC SAFETY PURPOSES THROUGH MAINTAINING INTERSECTION/ROADWAY SIGHT DISTANCES ACCORDING TO ADOPTED CITY OF KENT STANDARDS,PRACTICES, AND CODE REQUIREMENTS AS OF THE DATE OF PLAT APPROVAL.THE ABUTITNG PROPERTY OWNERS MAY NOT KNOWINGLY/ WILLFULLY/ INADVERTENTLY INSTALL/ CONSTRUCT/GRADE ANY POTENTIAL OBSTRUCTION TO VISIBILITY SUCH AS LANDSCAPE BERMS,FENCES,ROCKERIES,RETAINING WALLS, LANDSCAPING MATERIALS, STRUCTURES,ETC. WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THESE EASEMENTS. Hearing Examiner Findings and Recommendation Alvin's Pond #SU-97-3 THE CITY OF KENT HAS THE SOLE AUTHORITY TO CAUSE REMOVAL OF OBSTRUCTIONS AT THE PROPERTY OWNER'S SOLE EXPENSE, OR TO REQUIRE THAT THE PROPERTY OWNER IMMEDIATELY REMOVE ANY OBSTRUCTION(S) WITHIN THE SIGHT DISTANCE EASEMENT UPON WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE PROPERTY OWNER OF A VIOLATION OF SAID EASEMENT RESTRICTION,WITHOUT COMPENSATION FOR DAMAGES TO THE PROPERTY OWNER. 4. T lie Owner/Subdivider shall dedicate or deed all necessary pubiic rights of way for the public improvements listed above and shall provide all public and private easements necessary for the construction, operation, and maintenance of these required improvements. The minimum right-of-way and easement widths are given below. a. The Residential Street shall have a minimum right-of-way width of 49 feet, except that at the intersections and around the cul-de-sac, the right of way shall include the minimum 3-foot-wide utility strip behind the back of the sidewalks. Along the Sensitive Area Tract the minimum right of way may be reduced to five feet to reflect that no sidewalk is required b. The Residential Collector Arterial Streets shall have a minimum half-street right-of-way width of 33 feet,except at intersections where the right of way shall include the minimum 3-foot-wide utility strips behind the back of required sidewalks. C. Sanitary Sewer and Storm Sewer Easements shall be at least 10 feet in width along lots four(4)and five(5),and at least 15 feet in width for other lots. 9. The Owner/Subdivider shall protect permanently the approved and preserved, and/or enhanced, or created wetland(s) and it's buffer(s) by creating a separate Sensitive Area Tract and deeding the tract in fee simple to the City,OR by granting a Sensitive Area Easement to the City for the entire sensitive area. This Sensitive Area Tract or Easement shall be consistent with the wetland and wetland buffer map contained within the approved Wetland Delineation Report and/or approved Wetland Mitigation Plan as appropriate,unless otherwise approved. The Owner/Subdivider shall provide a legal description of said easement or tract prepared by a licensed land surveyor,prior to issuance of any construction permits. The Sensitive Area Tract and the following language shall be included on the face of the recorded plat: Hearing Examiner Findings and Recommendation Alvin's Pond 4SU-97-3 SENSITIVE AREA TRACTS 1 EASEMENTS DEDICATION OF A SENSITIVE AREA TRACT/EASEMENT CONVEYS TO THE PUBLIC A BENEFICIAL INTEREST IN THE LAND WITHIN THE TRACT. THIS INTEREST INCLUDES THE PRESERVATION OF NATIVE VEGETATION FOR ALL PURPOSES THAT BENEFIT THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE, INCLUDING CONTROL OF SURFACE WATER AND EROSION, MAINTENANCE OF SLOPE STABILITY, VISUAL AND AUT?AL BUFF RING . AIN pKO i FCTIOU OF 117>TER YUALtT1', PLANT ECOLOGY AND WILDLIFE HABITAT. THE SENSITIVE AREA TRACT/EASEMENT IMPOSES UPON ALL PRESENT AND FUTURE OWNERS AND OCCUPIERS OF THE LAND SUBJECT TO THE TRACT/EASEMENT THE OBLIGATION,ENFORCEABLE ON BEHALF OF THE PUBLIC BY THE CITY OF KENT, TO LEAVE UNDISTURBED ALL TREES AND OTHER VEGETATION WITHIN THE TRACT. THE VEGETATION WITHIN THE TRACT MAY NOT BE CUT, PRUNED, COVERED BY FILL, REMOVED OR DAMAGED WITHOUT APPROVAL IN WRITING FROM THE CITY OF KENT. THE COMMON BOUNDARY BETWEEN THE TRACT/EASEMENT AND THE AREA OF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY MUST BE MARKED OR OTHERWISE FLAGGED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE CITY OF KENT PRIOR TO ANY CLEARING, GRADING, BUILDING CONSTRUCTION OR OTHER DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY THE REQUIRED MARKING OR FLAGGING SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL ALL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES IN THE VICINITY OF THE SENSITIVE AREA TRACT ARE COMPLETED. NO BUILDING FOUNDATIONS, STRUCTURES, OR OBSTRUCTIONS (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO DECKS, PATIOS, OUTBUILDINGS AND OVERHANGS) ARE ALLOWED WITHIN 15 FEET OF THE SENSITIVE AREA TRACT/EASEMENT BOUNDARY,UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE CITY. THE CITY OF KENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO INSTALL PUBLIC UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WITHIN THIS SENSITIVE AREA TRACT, BUT IS REQUIRED TO RESTORE OR ENHANCE THE SENSITIVE AREAS DISTURBED UPON THE COMPLETION OF THE UNDERGROUND CONSTRUCTION. Hearing Examiner Findings and Recommendation Alvin's Pond #SU-97-3 10. After construction, the wetland and buffer areas shall be isolated from intrusion and/or disturbance using landscaping, or other appropriate screens, as well as an approved permanent wildlife-passable fence. In addition, wetland signs approved by the Department of Public Works shall be placed at the wetland buffer edge to inform and educate owners and nearby residents about the value of wetlands. 11. Prior to release of any construction bonds, the Department of Public Works must approve As-Built Drainage Plans for the entire site prepared by a professional land $nn/PVf1r li�en�e7 {�.. �` • f" - ei iT Ul y aute o Whit i nnfnrm nre to i - -l' Appendix "E" of the City of Kent Construction Standards. 12. The Owner/Subdivider shall waive abutters direct access rights for all lots having frontage on Southeast 260'b Street and 108' Avenue Southeast. The following RESTRICTION shall be stated clearly on the face of the approved plat: ACCESS RESTRICTION THE PROPERTY OWNERS OF ALL LOTS ABUTTING SOUTHEAST 260T" STREET AND 108T"AVENUE SOUTHEAST SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED TO TAKE DIRECT VEHICULAR ACCESS TO OR FROM SAID PUBLIC STREETS. VEHICULAR ACCESS TO ALL LOTS IS RESTRICTED TO THE APPROVED PUBLIC SUBDIVISION STREET AND TO THE APPROVED PRIVATE STREETS AND ACCESS TRACT/EASEMENT SHOWN HEREON. 13 The Owner/Subdivider shall provide the City with an approved topographic survey prepared by a professional land surveyor licensed by the State of Washington. This topographic survey shall show clearly the lines of Ordinary High Water for the creek that crosses the subject property. The face of the approved plat also shall show the creek, its buffer widths, and the setback for impervious surfaces from this creek (unless the setbacks from the Sensitive Area Tract will govern). 14. The Owner/Subdivider shall provide the City with an approved Drainage Easement for the creek on documents prepared by the Property Management Section of the Public Works Department. The location of this drainage easement will be determined by the topographic map required above, and the width of this drainage easement will include at least 15 feet (as measured from the lines of Ordinary High Water)on both sides of the creek. The Owner/Subdivider shall provide the City with a legal description for this drainage easement written by a professional land surveyor licensed by the State of Washington. Hearing Examiner Findings and Recommendation Alvin's Pond #SU-97-3 15. If an approved Wetland Mitigation Plan is required for work within wetlands or wetland buffers, then the Owner/Subdivider shall post a Wetland Mitigation Bond in the amount of 125 percent of the estimated cost for construction and maintenance for three year period, plus an additional 10 percent of the total cost to cover inflation and administrative review fees 16. The Owner/Subdivider shall provide fire hydrants at approved locations alonV with l.uauut of i;VVu P211f1r13 per---- i to"fire f10;�;'at<v YSi. 17. Dust generated during construction activities on all lots shall be controlled by wetting dust sources such as areas of exposed soils, washing truck wheels before they leave the site, and installing and maintaining gravel construction entrances Construction vehicle track out on public rights of way are violations subject to fines from the Department of Ecology, the City of Kent, and/or the Puget Sound Au Pollution Control Authority. 19. The Owner/Subdivider shall dedicate five percent(5 %)of the total plat area for open space park land or pay a fee in lieu of a donation per the requirements of Section 12 04.490 of the Kent City Code (The fee in lieu of a donation of 5°lo for open space land is $9,149.68, based on information from the King County Assessor's Office). 19. Mailboxes shall be located on either side of the plat street approximately 10 feet south of the lot line dividing Lots 1 and 2 (6 mailboxes total), at approximately the lot line dividing Lots 10 and 11 (6 mailboxes total), and on the east side of 108' Avenue Southeast at approximately the northerly line of Tract "D" if extended (2 mailboxes) as approved by the U S Postmaster. 20. The Owner/Subdivider shall remove all existing structures on the site. 21. The Owner/Subdivider shall accommodate METRO recommendations related to provisions for mass transit. These provisions may include, but are not limited to, providing direct access from the site to mass transit areas, providing for bus shelters, providing on on-site mass transit information area, etc The Owner/Subdivider shall provide documentation, acceptable to the City that the METRO recommendations have been accommodated 22. The cul-de-sac and each of the two access easements serving three or more lots shall be designated a streetfavenue by the Kent Fire Department. The Owner/Subdivider Hearing Examiner Findings and Recommendation Alvin's Pond 4SU-97-3 shall provide street signs according to the standards of the City of Kent Public Works Department. Property owners are responsible for maintenance of private street signs. B. PRIOR TO OR IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE ISSUANCE OF ANY BUILDING PERMITS FOR ANY LOT IN THE ALVIN'S POND SUBDIVISION (SU 97-3), THE OWNER/SUBDIVIDER SHALL: 1. Construct all of the improvements required in A., above. 2. Receive approval of the required As-built Drawings for Water, Sewer, Street, and Stormwater Facilities. 3. The property owner shall provide to residents of each lot information on mass transit opportunities in the vicinity of the site and about the safe use and disposal of household hazardous waste, including motor oil, in order to minimize surface water pollution. The Kent Planning Department shall provide the property owner with sample information brochures that may be distributed or made available to residents to satisfy this condition. Dated this 10"day of September, 1998. "_ 4,Ab ono. THEODORE PAUL HUNTER Hearing Examiner • Kent City Council Meeting Date December 9, 2003 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: AUTUMN GLEN FINAL PLAT—APPROVE 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Approve the final plat mylar for Autumn Glen #FSU-2001-7, and authorize the Mayor to sign the mylar. 3. EXHIBITS: Staff memo, map and Hearing Examiner Conditions of Approval 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Community Development Dept. staff (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5 UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION- Council Agenda Item No. 6T COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Fred N. Satterstrom, AICP, Director PLANNING SERVICES KENT Charlene Anderson,AICP, Manager W A5MIN010 Phone 253-856-5454 Fax 253-856-6454 Address 220 Fourth Avenue S Kent,WA 98032-5895 DATE: November 25, 2003 TO: MAYOR JIM WHITE, COUNCIL PRESIDENT JUDY WOODS AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: CHARLENE ANDERSON, AICP, PLANNING MANAGER THROUGH: MAYOR JIM WHITE SUBJECT: AUTUMN GLEN FINAL PLAT (#FSU-2001-7/KIVA#2032958) MOTION: Approve the final plat mylar for.Autumn Glen #FSU-2001-7 and authorize the Mayor to sign the mylar SUMMARY: Randy Sherman, LLC , proposes to subdir tde approximately 4 43 acres into twenty-three (23) single-family residential lots The property is located at 10505 SE 272"d Street BUDGET IMPACT: None BACKGROUND: On December 5, 2002, the Hearing Examiner issued a Findings and Decision granting preliminary approval of a 23-lot single-family residential subdivision, with 17 conditions The applicant has complied with the conditions required prior to recording S \Perrrut\Plan\longplats\20011,2032958-FSU-2001-7cc DOC Enclosure Conditions of approtial—Hearing Examiner - _---,$BT5B99 32510' _ R '91 OF-WAY 50' IFIACi B 5'DEDICATION P `SENWWE lAFA DECATION I �� l 1% \\\\\ ����� TRACT A GIECORY 3NS F DRAIWLE GICILRICS ,NERANp eyf 398 ^�`• pp i, � 105 - Cs V 109' 102 19 �16 ACCESS EASEMENT 10� -2 J i4 Jj a IX,STING WE''1 117 n n TO BE REMOVED - 3 — �----- „5 n 17 TRACT C g 4 15 PEDESTRM ACCESS N Z _ IX'BUKDRIGS Q 16 TO BE REMDKD 0- ~ 5 - a C rJ� J rJ — 7 „G 15 -ay 6 ns ROAD 'B' �;z 14 130 / ,00 — sv so 60 56 t, 1 IB'KCCS EASEMENT Q 13 _ s a s 5 g to I- 11 - 12 - o ,5 AA USE! ^ SEWER ME'IT 56 NBT2012'W 325M' ------ APPLICATION NAME. AUTUMN GLEN REQUEST. #FSU-2001-7 KIVA#2032958 SITE MAP AUTUMN GLEN #SU-2001-7 KIVA #RPP3-2021630 ON December 5, 2002, THE HEARING EXAMINER APPROVED THE AUTUMN GLEN SUBDIVISION WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS. A. PRIOR TO RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION 1. The Owner/Subdivider shall pay all charges in Lieu of Assessments and/or Latecomer Fees, if any, prior to scheduling the Pre-Construction Conference and/or prior to recording this plat, whichever comes first 2 The Owner/Subdivider shall submit and receive City approval of engineering drawings from the Department of Public Works, and shall then either construct or bond for the following. a A gravity sanitary sewer system to serve all lots The City sanitary sewer system shall be extended from the existing City sanitary sewer system and shall be deep enough to serve all off-site properties within the same service area including properties to the north of Southeast 272"d Street, in addition, the sanitary sewer system shall be extended across the entire subdivision as needed to serve adjacent properties within the same service area, unless otherwise determined by the Public Works Director The septic system serving the existing home(s) within the proposed plat - if any - shall be abandoned in accordance with King County Health Department Regulations b A waters stem meeting domestic and fire flow requirements y g o equ ements for all lots. The City water system shall be extended as determined necessary by the Public Works Department and shall be sized to serve all off- site properties within the same service area, in addition, the water main extension shall be extended across the entire subdivision as needed to serve adjacent properties within the same service area, unless otherwise determined by the water purveyor The Fire Department requests that the existing 12-inch water main in Southeast 272"d Street be looped to 108th Avenue Southeast This may not be necessary if fire flows are adequate as determined by the Fire Department and Public Works The Owner/ Subdivider r� shall provide fire flow test results for the nearest existing hydrant on Autumn Glenn #SU-2001-7 KIVA #2021630 Conditions of Approval Page 2 of 11 which to base fire flow calculations for the proposed subdivision If flows are deemed sufficient, the Public Works Director, at his discretion, may waive the looping requirement with the approval of the Fire Department. The existing well(s) shall be abandoned in accordance with the requirements of the Department of Ecology. The title report dated 7/13/2001 suggests the existence of restrictions (recording number 7403290508) limiting the use of portions of this property in order to protect an existing well This 100-foot radius well protection zone must be clearly delineated on the Final Plat, unless the protected well is to be abandoned, and the protection zone cannot render any of the lots "unbuildable" as jointly determined by Planning and Public Works. C. Detailed Drainage Plans meeting the requirements of the City of Construction Standards, and City of Kent Development Assistance Brochure #5-3, Detailed Drainage Plans. Initial guidance is given in the conditions, which follow. (1) The Owner/Subdivider shall construct an on-site public detention / retention pond system in accordance with the Kent Construction Standards to mitigate for potential impacts to both stormwater runoff quantity and quality This pond shall be constructed within a public stormwater management tract. The detention / retention pond storage volume and release criteria shall be that for the HILL, the pre- development condition shall be assumed to be grass only unless otherwise determined by the Department of Public Works. (2) As development occurs within this subdivision, roof downspouts for each roofed structure (house, garage, carport, etc ) shall be directed to Roof Downspout Infiltration Trenches, or Perforated Stubouts, meeting the requirements of the City of Kent Construction Standards, and City of Kent Development Assistance Brochure #5-5, Roof Downspout Infiltration Trench Systems, Downspout Dispersion System, and Perforated Stubout Connections. These roof downspout conveyance and infiltration systems shall include overflow Autumn Glenn #SU-2001-7 KIVA #2021630 Conditions of Approval Page 3 of 11 pipes connected to an approved conveyance system The Detailed Drainage Plans shall include an approved detail for the Roof Downspout Infiltration Trench, or Perforated Stubout, and will provide for private stormwater stubouts to each lot for future connection from the Roof Downspout Infiltration Trenches, or Perforated Stubouts The face of the recorded plat shall contain the following restriction AS A CONDITION OF BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE, RESIDENCES CONSTRUCTED ON LOTS OF THIS SUBDIVISION MUST PROVIDE ROOF DOWNSPOUT INFILTRATION TRENCH (PERFORATED STUBOUT) SYSTEMS PER DETAILS SHOWN ON THE APPROVED STORMWATER PLANS (4) A downstream analysis is required for this development, and it shall include an analysis for capacity, erosion potential, and water quality from the point of discharge to the point where stormwater discharges to the City of Kent Upper Mill Creek Detention Pond See City of Kent Development Assistance Brochure #5-4, Downstream Analyses, for the specific information required for downstream analyses (5) If determined necessary by the Public Works Department, the Owner/Subdivider shall provide public drainage easements meeting the requirements of the City of Kent Construction Standards for the specified downstream reach where adequate public drainage easements do not currently exist. The minimum required downstream reach for this subdivision shall include the area from the proposed point of discharge from this development to that point where it enters the City of Kent Upper Mill Creek Detention Pond. (6) The Owner/Subdivider shall submit Landscape Plans for within and surrounding the retention / detention facility to Planning Services and to the Department of Public Works for concurrent review and approval prior to, or in conjunction with, the approval of the Detailed Drainage Plans These Autumn Glenn #SU-2001-7 KIVA #2021630 Conditions of Approval Page 4 of 11 Landscape Plans shall meet the minimum requirements of the City of Kent Construction Standards, and the stormwater management landscaping requirements contained within City of Kent Development Assistance Brochure #5, Landscape Plans. Landscape Plans are not to be used to show required Street Trees. (7) The Owner/Subdivider shall execute Declaration of Stormwater Facility Maintenance Covenants for the private portions of the drainage system prepared by the Property Management Section of the Department of Public Works. See City of Kent Development Assistance Brochure #5-17, Declaration of Stormwater Facility Maintenance Covenants, for information on what is contained within this document d An open-to-the-air public stormwater treatment system in accordance with the requirements of the Kent Construction Standards, and published City of Kent Development Assistance Brochures dealing with stormwater treatment, to mitigate for potential impacts to stormwater runoff quality Acceptable stormwater treatment facilities meeting this requirement in their preferred order include- infiltration after pretreatment, biofiltration swales, wet ponds, extended detention ponds, and created wetlands. See City of Kent Development Assistance Brochures #5- 1, through #5-15, for additional information on stormwater treatment requirements (1) The stormwater treatment system shall be within the approved public stormwater management tract (2) Easements for biofdtration swales across private lots will not be acceptable to meet this requirement. e A Detailed Grading Plan for the entire subdivision meeting the requirements of the Uniform Budding Code, the City of Kent Construction Standards, and City of Kent Development Assistance Brochure #1-3, Excavation and Grading Permits & Grading Plans. Initial guidance for these plans is given below: Autumn Glenn #SU-2001-7 KIVA #2021630 Conditions of Approval Page 5 of 11 (1) These plans will include provisions for utilities, roadways, retention/detention ponds, stormwater treatment facilities, and a building footpad for each lot (2) These plans shall be designed to eliminate the need for processing several individual Grading Permits upon application for Building Permits: phasing of grading on a lot- by-lot basis will not be considered f. A Temporary Erosion/Sedimentation Control Plan for the entire subdivision meeting the requirements of the City of Kent Construction Standards, and the most recent version of the Washington State Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington These plans must reflect the Detailed Grading Plan discussed above, and Planning Services approved Detailed Tree Plan h Interim Street Improvement Plans for Southeast 272nd Street frontage of this proposed development These Street Improvement Plans shall meet the requirements of the City of Kent Construction Standards, and City of Kent Development Assistance Brochures #6-2, Private and Public Street Improvements, and # 6-8, Street Improvement Plans, for a street designated as a Residential Collector Street Augmented With Bike Lanes by the City of Kent Master Plan of Roadways Initial guidance for the necessary street improvements is provided below. (1) Combined concrete curb & gutter, a 5-foot wide planting strip, and a 5-foot cement concrete sidewalk on the south side of the street (2) A minimum of 23-feet of asphalt pavement as measured from the City approved design centerline to the face of curb on the south side of the street, plus at least 12-feet of asphalt pavement as measured from the centerline of the right-of-way to the edge of the traveled lane on the north side of the street (3) Shoulder improvements on the north side of the street as approved by the Public Works Department Autumn Glenn #SU-2001-7 KIVA #2021630 • Conditions of Approval Page 6 of 11 (4) A City-approved street lighting system. (5) Public stormwater collection, conveyance, detention and treatment facilities. (6) Street Trees installed within the 5-foot wide planting strips constructed b etween the back of curb a nd t he f ront of the cement concrete sidewalk. These Street Trees will be located at least 30-feet from streetlights, and the species shall be selected from the Approved Street Tree List contained within City of Kent Development Assistance Brochure #14, City of Kent Street Trees. i. Street Improvement Plans for the new public Residential Street connected to Southeast 272"d Street and terminating with a temporary cul-de-sac at its southwest termini The Street Improvement Plans for this street shall be designed in conformance with the requirements for a Residential Street as required by City of Kent Construction Standards, and City of Kent Development Assistance Brochures #6-2, Private and Public Street Improvements and City of Kent Development Assistance Brochure # 6-8, Street Improvement Plans for a street 28-feet wide Initial guidance for these street improvements is given below (1) Combined curbs & gutters, a 5-foot wide planting strip constructed b etween the back of curb a nd t he f ront of the sidewalk, and 5-foot wide cement concrete sidewalks on both sides of the street. (2) A minimum of 28-feet of asphalt pavement, measured from face of curb to face of curb. (3) Unless otherwise approved by Planning Services, the public street extension to the west shall connect at the common east-to-west property line for the two abutting lots on the west side of the subject subdivision (4) Unless otherwise approved by Public Works, the horizontal alignment for this new public street will provide for three horizontal curves having a centerline radius of 55-feet, and will provide for at least 50-foot of tangent between adjacent Autumn Glenn #SU-2001-7 KIVA#2021630 Conditions of Approval Page 7 of 11 horizontal curves, and for a least 100-feet between reverse horizontal curves (5) A street lighting system designed, constructed and maintained by the IntoLight Division of Puget Sound Energy. The electrical bills shall be paid for by a Home Owner's Association (6) A public stormwater drainage system, including provisions for conveyance, detention, and treatment facilities (7) Curb return radii of 25-feet at the intersection of the subdivision street and Southeast 272"d Street, and a 45-foot radius to the thickened edges of pavement for the temporary cul-de-sacs (8) Street Trees installed within the 5-foot wide planting strips These Street Trees will be located at least 30-feet from street lights, and the species shall be selected from the Approved Street Tree List contained within City of Kent Development Assistance Brochure #14, City of Kent Street Trees. J. Street Improvement Plans for the new Private Residential Streets constructed within private roadway tracts or easements, connected to the new public Residential Street and serving Lot 11 , Lot 12, Lot 13, Lot 19, Lot 20, and the public stormwater management Tract A. The Street Improvement Plans for these streets shall be designed in conformance with the requirements of a Private Residential Street as required by City of Kent Construction Standards, and City of Kent Development Assistance Brochure #6-2, Private and Public Street Improvements and City of Kent Development Assistance Brochure # 6-8, Street Improvement Plans for a street at least 20- feet wide. Initial guidance for these street improvements is given below (1) Asphalt concrete pavement as measured from edge of pavement to edge of pavement shall be as approved by the Fire Department Autumn Glenn #SU-2001-7 KIVA #2021630 Conditions of Approval Page 8 of 11 (2) An approved cul-de-sac, or turnaround at their termini, unless otherwise determined by the City Fire Marshal (3) A private stormwater drainage system, including provisions for collection, conveyance, detention, and treatment facilities where applicable. (4) Unless additional asphalt concrete pavement width is provided for parking, all minimum width private streets shall have pavement markings and traffic signs installed which clearly designate these private streets as Fire Lanes, where no parking will be permitted. (5) The private roadway tracts, or private roadway easements, shall be maintained through the implementation of Mutual Maintenance Agreements between the affected/benefiting lots. k Street Light Plans for Southeast 272"d Street, and for the new Public Residential Street serving the subdivision. These plans shall meet the minimum requirements of the City of Kent Construction Standards, and City of Kent Development Assistance Brochure #6- 1, Street Lighting Requirements. 3 The Owner/Subdivider shall create a Homeowner's Association for this subdivision to ensure that the property owners within this subdivision are advised of their requirement to pay for the provided street lighting system Those sections of the required document written to govern that association as they relate to any IntoLight Division of Puget Sound Energy street lighting systems and providing for private maintenance of the private streets serving Lot 11, Lot 12, Lot 13, Lot 19 and 20, shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works, prior to the recording these documents. 4 Lot 1 shall be provided a specific driveway location meeting minimum sight distance requirements of the City of Kent. Autumn Glenn #SU-2001-7 KIVA#2021630 Conditions of Approval Page 9 of 11 5. The face of the final plat shall be contain the following restriction DIRECT VEHICULAR ACCESS TO AND FROM LOT 1 AND TO AND FROM TRACT A SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED ONTO SOUTHEAST 272ND STREET 6. The Owner/Subdivider shall deed all public rights-of-way, and otherwise convey all private and public easements necessary for the construction and maintenance of the required improvements for this subdivision development. 7 The Owner/Subdivider shall submit and receive approval for a Detailed Tree Plan, meeting the requirements of the Kent Zoning Code, and City of Kent Development Assistance Brochure #3, Detailed Tree Plans, prior to the issuance of any Construction Permits for the subdivision Grading Plans cannot be approved by the Department of Public Works without an approved Detailed Tree Plan Detailed Tree Plans are not to confused with required Street Tree Plans, which have an entirely different purpose 8. The Owner/Subdivider shall permanently protect the approved and preserved, and/or enhanced, or created wetland(s) and its buffer(s) by creating a separate Sensitive Area Tract and deeding the tract in fee simple to the City, OR by granting a Sensitive Area Easement to the City for the entire sensitive area, in conformance to t he requirements of the City of Kent Wetlands Management Code This Sensitive Area Tract or Easement shall be consistent with the wetland and wetland buffer map contained within the approved Wetland Delineation Report and/or approved Wetland Mitigation Plan as appropriate The Owner/Subdivider shall provide a legal description of said easement or tract prepared by a licensed land surveyor, prior to issuance of any Construction Permits. The Sensitive Area Tract and the following language shall be included on the face of the recorded plat. SENSITIVE AREA TRACTS/EASEMENTS DEDICATION OF A SENSITIVE AREA TRACT/EASEMENT CONVEYS TO THE PUBLIC A BENEFICIAL INTEREST IN THE LAND WITHIN THE TRACT THIS INTEREST INCLUDES THE PRESERVATION OF NATIVE VEGETATION FOR ALL PURPOSES THAT BENEFIT THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE, INCLUDING CONTROL OF SURFACE WATER AND EROSION, MAINTENANCE OF SLOPE STABILITY, VISUAL AND AURAL BUFFERING, AND PROTECTION OF WATER QUALITY, PLANT ECOLOGY AND WILDLIFE Autumn Glenn #SU-2001-7 KIVA #2021630 Conditions of Approval Page 10 of 11 HABITAT THE SENSITIVE AREA TRACT / EASEMENT IMPOSES UPON ALL PRESENT AND FUTURE OWNERS AND OCCUPIERS OF THE LAND SUBJECT TO THE TRACT / EASEMENT THE OBLIGATION, ENFORCEABLE ON BEHALF OF THE PUBLIC BY THE CITY OF KENT, TO LEAVE UNDISTURBED ALL TREES AND OTHER VEGETATION WITHIN THE TRACT THE VEGETATION WITHIN THE TRACT MAY NOT BE CUT, PRUNED, COVERED BY FILL, REMOVED OR DAMAGED WITHOUT APPROVAL IN WRITING FROM THE CITY OF KENT. THE COMMON BOUNDARY BETWEEN THE TRACT/EASEMENT AND THE AREA OF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY MUST BE MARKED OR OTHERWISE FLAGGED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE CITY OF KENT PRIOR TO ANY CLEARING, GRADING, BUILDING CONSTRUCTION OR OTHER DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY. THE REQUIRED MARKING OR FLAGGING SHALL R EMAIN I N P LACE U NTIL A LL D EVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES I N THE VICINITY OF THE SENSITIVE AREA TRACT ARE COMPLETED NO BUILDING FOUNDATIONS, STRUCTURES, FILL OR OBSTRUCTIONS (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO DECKS, PATIOS, OUTBUILDINGS AND OVERHANGS) ARE ALLOWED WITHIN 15 FEET OF THE SENSITIVE AREA TRACT/EASEMENT BOUNDARY, UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE CITY THE CITY OF KENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO INSTALL PUBLIC UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WITHIN THIS SENSITIVE AREA TRACT, AND TO ENTER AND PERFORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM MAINTENANCE, BUT IS REQUIRED TO RESTORE OR ENHANCE THE SENSITIVE AREAS DISTURBED UPON THE COMPLETION OF THE UNDERGROUND CONSTRUCTION, AND/OR DRAINAGE SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 9 After construction, the wetland and buffer areas shall be isolated from intrusion and/or disturbance using landscaping, or other appropriate screens, as well as an approved permanent wildlife-passable fence. In addition, Wetland Information Signs approved by the Department of Public Works shall be placed at the wetland buffer edge to inform and educate owners and nearby residents about the value of wetlands The wetland signage details on the preliminary plat map are King County details, not City of Kent. This needs to be revised to show Kent's standard details. 10. Prior to release of any construction bonds, and prior to the approval of any Building Permits within the subject subdivision, the Department of Public Works must receive and approve As-Built Drawings meeting the requirements of the City of Kent Construction Standards, and City of Kent Autumn Glenn #SU-2001-7 KIVA #2021630 Conditions of Approval Page 11 of 11 Development Assistance Brochure #E-1, As-Build Drawings, for Streets, Street Lighting System; Water, Sewer, Stormwater Drainage Facilities, and all off-site Improvements where the locations and/or elevations are deemed critical by the Department of Public Works 11 . The Owner/Subdivider shall provide a 10-foot wide pedestrian connection to the property (ies) to the east as show on the preliminary plat map This walkway shall be paved and lighted and otherwise constructed as required by the City of Kent construction standards and Public Works Department 12 Prior to final plat approval, lots shall be reconfigured so that Lot 5 is enlarged to a minimum of 5,700 square feet OR a variance from minimum size is granted C. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT ON ANY LOT IN THIS SUBDIVISION, THE OWNER/SUBDIVIDER SHALL • 1 Record the Plat 2. Pay the Environmental Mitigation Fee for that lot 3. Construct all of the improvements required above 4 Submit and receive City approval for As-Built Drawings meeting the requirements of City of Kent Development Assistance Brochure #E-1, As- Budd Drawings, for street improvements, stormwater management system, street lighting system, and other off-site improvements where determined necessary by the City 5 Pay the school impact fee for that lot S\Permit\Plan\longpiats\2001\2032958-2001-7CONDITIONS DOC • Kent City Council Meeting Date December 9, 2003 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: KENT LAND USE AND PLANNING BOARD APPOINTMENT AND RE-APPOINTMENT — CONFIRM 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Confirmation of the Mayor's appointment of Ms. Elizabeth Watson to serve as a member of the Kent Land Use and Planning Board. Ms Watson is a Kent resident and realizes the importance of local government in shaping the future of our community. She is interested in long range planning goals and would like to serve the City as a member of the Land Use and Planning Board. Ms. Watson will replace Deborah Ranger, Ph.D., who is leaving the Board to serve as a Kent City Councilmembers. Ms. Watson's new appointment will begin 1/1/04 and will continue until 12/31/06. Confirmation of the Mayor's re-appointment of Mr Jon Johnson to continue serving as a Land Use and Planning Board member. His new appointment will continue until 12/31/06. 3. EXHIBITS: Memo 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Mayor White (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION ACTION- Council Agenda Item No. 6U . OFFICE OF THE MAYOR Jim White, Mayor Phone 253-856-5700 Fax 253-856-6700 Address 220 Fourth Avenue S ON T Kent WA 98032-5895 W<SHI,. TON TO JtiDY WOODS, COUNCIL PRESIDENT CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM JIM WHITE, MAYOR DATE NOVEMBER 25, 2003 RE APPOINTMENT AND RE-APPOINTMENT TO KENT LAND USE AND PLANNING BOARD I have appointed Ms Elizabeth Watson to serve as a member of the Kent Land Use and Planning Board Ms Watson is a Kent resident and realizes the importance of local government in shaping the future of our community She is interested in long range planning goals and would like to serve the City as a member of the Land Use and Planning Board Ms Watson will replace Deborah Ranniger, who is leaving the Board to serve as a Kent City Council Member Ms Watson's new appointment will begin on 1/1/04 and Nti ill continue until 12/31/06 1 have also re-appointed Mr Jon Johnson to continue serving as a Land Use and Planning Board member His new appointment will continue until 12/31/06 1 submit this for your confirmation Jb Kent City Council Meeting Date December 9, 2003 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: KENT BICYCLE ADVISORY BOARD RE-APPOINTMENTS — CONFIRM 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Confirmation of the Mayor's re-appointments of Mr. Bill Miller, Mr. Steve Nuss and Mr Jacob Grob to continue serving as members of the Kent Bicycle Advisory Board. Their new appointments will continue until 12/31/2005. 3. EXHIBITS: Memo 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Mayor White (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: S SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 6V OFFICE OF THE MAYOR Jim White, Mayor Phone 253-856-5700 Fax 253-856-6700 Address 220 Fourth Avenue S KENT Kent, WA 98032-5895 YW.SHIFGTON I TO- JUDY WOODS, COUNCIL PRESIDENT CITY COUNCIL MET\4BERS FROM JIM WHITE, MAYOR t- DATE NOVEMBER 25, 2003 RE RE-APPOINTMENTS TO KENT BICYCLE ADVISORY BOARD I have re-appointed Mr Bill Miller, Mr Steve Nuss, and Mr Jacob Grob to continue sere mg-as members of the Kent Bicycle Advisory Board Their nevv appointments will continue until 12i31i05 ' I submit this for your confirmation '� Ib ® Kent City Council Meeting Date December 9, 2003 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: KENT ARTS COMMISSION RE-APPOINTMENT - CONFIRM I 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Confirmation of the Mayor's re-appointment of Scott Manthey to continue serving as a member of the Kent Arts Commission. His new t appointment will continue until 10/31/2007 3. EXHIBITS: Memo I 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Mavor White I (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) ` 5 UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES_ f 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: S SOURCE OF FUNDS• 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 6W 40 • KENT W ASHINGTGh MEMORANDUM TO JUDY WOODS, CITY COUNCIL PRESIDENT CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM MAYOR JIM WHITE DATE NOVEMBER 25, 2003 SUBJECT: RE-APPOINTMENT TO THE KENT ARTS COMMISSION I have re-appointed Mr Scott Manthey to continue serving as a member of the Kent Arts Commission His new term will continue until 10/31/2007 1 submit this for your confirmation Ib I Kent City Council Meeting Date December 9, 2003 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: KENT HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION APPOINTMENT AND RE-APPOINTMENTS— CONFIRM 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Confirmation of the Mayor's appointment of Mr Jon Botten to serve as a new member of the Kent Human Services Commission. Mr. Botten is Executive Director of The Children's Therapy Center in Kent, he belongs to Kiwams, is a member of the Executive Alliance of Social Service Agencies and is active with the South King County Council of Human Services. He will replace Mike Hemisch, whose term expired, and he will serve as a non-voting Agency Representative on the Commission. His term will become effective on 1/l/04 and will continue until 1/I/07. Confirmation of the Mayor's re-appointment of Mr. Brad Bell and Pastor Perry Raak to continue serving as members of the Commission. Their new terms will continue until 1/1/07. 3. EXHIBITS: Memo i 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Mayor White (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 6X • KENT WAS 4 1 N O T O N MEMORANDUM TO JUDY WOODS, CITY COUNCIL PRESIDENT CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM MAYOR JIM WHITE DATE NOVEMBER 25, 2003 SUBJECT APPOINTMENT AND RE-APPOINTMENTS TO THE KENT HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION 1 have appointed Mr Jon Botten to serve as a neA member of the Kent Human Services Commission Mr Botten is Executive Director of The Children's Therapy Center, belongs to Kiwams, is a member of the Executive Alliance of Social Service Agencies and is active with the South King County Council of Human Services He will replace Mike Heinisch, whose term expired, and he will serve as the non-voting Agency Representative on the Commission. His term will become effective on 1/1/04 and will continue until 1/l/07. 1 have also re-appointed Mr Brad Bell and Pastor Perry Raak to continue serving as members of the Commission Their new terms will continue until 1/1/07 1 submit this for your confirmation Jb • OFFICE OF THE MAYOR (� _r Jim White, Mayor U Phone 253-856-5700 Fax 253-856-6700 Address 220 Fourth Avenue S KENT Kent, IN 98032-5895 WASHINGTON TO JUDY WOODS, COUNCIL PRESIDENT CITY COUNCIL MEM ERS FROM. JIM WHITE, '_MAYOR DATE DECEMBER 4,2003 RE APPOINTMENT TO KENT LAND USE AND PLANNING BOARD I have appointed Ms Janette Nuss to serve as a member of the Kent Land Use and Planning Board Ms Nuss and her family are West Hill residents and until recently she was employed at the Tacoma Art Museum in Private Programming Ms Nuss is knowledgeable about land use . and planning issues since she previously served as a member of Kent's Planning Commission Ms Nuss will replace Ron Harmon, who will resign from the Land Use and Planning Board to begin his service as a Kent City Councilmember Ms Nuss's term will continue until 12/31/04 1 submit this for your confinnation jb • OFFICE OF THE MAYOR Jim White, Mayor /1 i Phone 253-856-5700 �/ Fax 253-856-6700 Address 220 Fourth Avenue S KEN T Kent,WA 98032-5895 WASHINGTON MEMORANDUM TO- JUDY WOODS, COUNCIL PRESIDENT CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: JIM WHITE, MAYOR DATE: DECEMBER 8, 2003 RE- APPOINTMENT TO KENT REGIONAL JUSTICE CENTER ADVISORY BOARD I have appointed Pastor Jane Prestbye of Kent Lutheran Church to serve as a member of the Regional Justice Center Advisory Board Pastor Prestbye and her husband are Kent residents • since moving to Kent 5 years ago to begin her work at the Church She attended Western Washington University, Trinity Lutheran College and the Lutheran Seminary. Pastor Prestbye will replace Marvin Eckfeldt, whose term expired. Her new term will continue until 12/31/06 1 submit this for your confirmation. jb Kent City Council Meeting Date December 9, 2003 Category Other Business 1. SUBJECT: STREAMLINED SALES TAX RESOLUTION — ADOPT 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: This resolution supports efforts to streamline tax collection definitions and procedures. However, the resolution requests that sales tax revenue from intrastate sales continue to be distributed at the point of sale rather than at the point of delivery. This approach protects cities that have used this sales tax revenue to construct and operate infrastructure to support businesses that generate these intrastate sales. At the same time, this approach would still distribute sales taxes generated by catalog and internet sales conducted by out of state companies to the point of delivery, which would be the cities whose residents and businesses placed the order This approach would ensure that all cities across the state will benefit from the streamlined sales tax provisions. 3. EXHIBITS: Resolution 4 RECOMMENDED BY: Operations Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5 UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES_ None now, however, implementation of sales tax streamlining provisions that shift sales tax distribution for intrastate sales from point of sale to point of delivery would cost the City approximately$4 million annually 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS• 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: 1 Councilmember C.o moves, Councilmember v') seconds to adopt Resolution No., W supporting the Washington State adoption and implementation of the Streamlined Sales Tax Agreement and requests mitigation and linkage to internet and catalog sales taxes DISCUSSION: ACTION- Council Agenda Item No. 7A RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION of the City of Kent supporting the Washington State adoption and implementation of the Streamlined Sales Tax Agreement, provided that the State also 1) ensures a full mitigation or "hold harmless" method is put in place for sourcing-impacted cities, and 2) utilizes a timeline that is fully linked, or more closely linked, to congressional authorization of internet and catalog sales takes. WHEREAS, the City of Kent understands and supports the concept of streamlining definitions and sales tax rates for interstate sales, and WHEREAS, the City of Kent believes it is important to make the State sales tax system effective and efficient for priN ate businesses both -,ti ithin the State of Washington and outside our geographic boundaries, and WHEREAS, the State of Washington's tax structure is highly dependent upon sales tax receipts, and WHEREAS, the City of Kent has committed to its citizens and businesses capital improvements and the delivery of services that depend upon present and future sales tax income projected on a point of sale basis, and WHEREAS, many cities, including the City of Kent, have NAorked hard to develop economic, transportation, and land use policies that meet regional needs for employment in warehousing, manufacturing, and retail activities and have expended 1 Support of Streamlined Sales Tax significant resources to address infrastructure, traffic, and law enforcement demands that result from those policies; and WHEREAS, if the State changes the distnbution of sales tax receipts from point of sale to point of distribution, there is a tax shift between cities who have developed the economic and land use policies to support regional growth to cities and counties that have chosen not to have this activity in their geographic boundaries; and WHEREAS, if the State changes the distribution of sales tax receipts from point of sale to point of distribution, a few dozen cities will bear the largest share of the burden; and WHEREAS, there are fundamental fairness issues that should be honored when a major shift in tax policy «ould result in significant adverse impacts to dozens of jurisdictions, such as the City of Kent, that have simply been following Washington State's tax policy and rules for many years, and WHEREAS, this issue of equality is of great importance to the City of Kent, NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. — Recitals Incorporated The above recitals are incorporated into this resolution. SECTION 2. — Supom The City of Kent supports the concept of streamlining sales tax information and definitions to make it easier to collect sales taxes for interstate and intrastate Internet-based commerce. SECTION 3. —MrtrQation Measures The City of Kent strongly urges that the Department of Revenue recommend, and ultimately the Washington State Legislature adopt, sales tax streamlining in a way that contains strong mitigation or hold-harmless measures for cities that traditionally have received sales taxes on a point of sale basis, 2 Support of Streamlined Sales Tax such as a method that protects intrastate sales tax revenues by adopting point of delivery collection measures on the one hand but using distribution methods that protect city revenues on the other. SECTION 4. — Linka e. The City of Kent strongly urges that the I Department of Revenue recommend, and ultimately the Washington State Legislature adopt, measures that either fully link, or more closely link, any implementation of the Streamlined Sales Tax Agreement with federal congressional authorization of sales tax imposition on interriet-based and mail order catalog sales SECTION S. — Severabilia If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase of this resolution is declared unconstitutional or invalid for any reason, such decision shall not affect the N alidity of the remaining portions of this resolution. 1 SECTION 6. — Effective Date This resolution shall take effect and be in ` force immediately upon its passage 1 � PASSED at a regular open public meeting by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, this day of December, 2003 CONCURRED in by the Mayor of the City of Kent this day of December, 2003 JEI l WHITE, MAYOR ATTEST: BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK 3 Support of Streamlined Sales Tax APPROVED AS TO FORM: 7� TOM BRUBAKER,CITY ATTORNEY I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of Resolution No passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, the day of December, 2003. BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK 1 l nY NI vV 1 f U\wn�.TUJ�18 4 Support of Streamlined Sales Tax Kent City Council Meeting Date December 9, 2003 Category Other Business 1. SUBJECT: 2003 PROPERTY TAX 1% STATUTORY ADJUSTMENT FOR 2004 BUDGET ORDINANCE - ADOPT 1 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: State law requires a separate ordinance or resolution in order to authorize any increase in property tax. This ordinance authorizes the statutorily allowed 1% increase for inflation, which represents $217,043, in the property tax levy for the 2004 budget. This adjustment is in addition to increases resulting from the addition of new construction and improvements to property, from any increase in the value of state-assessed property, from the refund fund levy, and from annexed properties. 3. EXHIBITS: Ordinance and property tax information 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Operations Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember i1 C:O moves, Councilmember seconds to adopt Ordinance No. b °p 3 �' adopting a 1 /o increase of$217 043 over the 2003 P g , property tax levy for the 2004 budget, in addition to increases resulting from new construction, improvements, increases in state assessed property, other adjustment, and annexed properties. DISCUSSION- ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 7B ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington,authorizing the 2003 property tax levy for the 2004 budget at the previous year's tax levy, with a statutonly allowed one (1) percent increase for inflation, together with any increases resulting from the addition of new construction and impro%ements to property, from any increase in the value of state-assessed property, from the refund fund levy, and from annexed properties I WHEREAS,pursuant to RCW 84 55 120 and after prov[ding all appropriate) notice,the City Council held a public hearing on September 16, 2003,to consider the City of Kent's proposed operating and capital budget for the 2004 calendar year, and held a public hearing on November 18, 2003, to address the City's 2003 property tax leN y, revenues, and limit factors, as well as the proposed 2004 budget; and I WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 84 55 120, any increase in property tax revenue other than that resulting from the addition of new construction and improvements to property, annexations, and any increase in the value of state-assessed property and the refund fund levy,requires the adoption of a separate ordinance from the tax levy ordinance specifically authorizing the increase in terms of both dollars and percentage; and i WHEREAS, the City Council finds that to best protect the public health, safety,and welfare,to best protect the City's future property tax levy capacity,to best serve the citizens of Kent by maintaining an appropriate level of service throughout the City,to I Tax Levy Adjustment Authorize 2004 Budge appropriately discharge the City's expected expenses and obligations, and to best serve the citizens of Kent through a continued commitment to capital improvements throughout the City, a substantial need exists to increase its tax levy over last year;NOW,THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT,WASHINGTON,DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. - Recitals Incorporated. The foregoing recitals are incorporated into this ordinance. I SECTION 2. - Property Tax Levi,Authorr_ed In addition to the increase resulting from new construction and mtproNements to property, from annexations, from any increase in the value of state-assessed property, and from the refund fund levy, the 2003 regular property tax dollar levy for the 2004 budget is authorized at the previous year's property tax levy, plus a one (1) percent increase, representing S217,043 i SECTION 3. - Severahihty If anyone or more sections, subsections, or sentences of this ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the-v alidity of the remaining portion of this ordinance and the same shall remamj in full force and effect. SECTION 4. - Effective Date. This ordinance shall tale effect and be in force five(5)days from and after its passage,approval,and publication as provided by law JIM WHITE, MAYOR 2 Tax Levy Adjustment Authorized 2004 Budget i ATTEST: BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK I APPROVED AS TO FORM. TOM BRUBAKER, CITY ATTORNEY 2 _ PASSED- day of December, _uU3 APPROVED day of December, 2003 PUBLISHED day of December, 2003 I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No pass by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, and approved by the Mayor of thl City of Kent as hereon indicated l (SEAL) I BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK I III P,C11.WRDIN ANCE Tea U,ylnar.eEwWuhed 2004 do I 3 Tax Levy Adjustment Authorized 2004 Budget N o 0 0 0 � 0 w o N ou10i Cl) V C N 0 O Y _ � c .. .7 O N Q �+ Y co O N ` C f6 w M U w W O Y O O w o O m 7 N O c O CJ Q U o L o ( y w U LO O Y C ami > -O° o d U w O o o z Ln II! L e L C C) o y0 U O. .�,, a J D w L Q� L N , 4 w N O o n S p Q a o p a a = w M ` O ` ♦� N O F� c w N T U N fV I Z a m d w Elm W 4 N O N J d- M Or3l Co O O Cfl d- N M O M .� N O r O ti r N U M)o ti O r 00 O t`- 1%-- t` N cwM M 1%-� O O �— N O N N N N -,•-i Q N L � L a) O > cz G) m 06 f-- cc A cc .� > =o 'a � emu- . V •— � � O CIOC:L - LL. a. cc CD 0 ---- --- x 'd to O ti W) !T Ln N 1- W) 60# N N O N O M LO 1- N tt con otoN00 LO � N N O CIO C ? i d OO N t- tf Lo �-Ln CT) t7) _ O 1- N CD LO N A N N O N O O x e- N 0D O_ N O OLO ti N O O !R >+ LO N N O vi J o 0 a � o T.- M sf t- M p, O N 00 O tf Ln O O O N N CD 64 w N N O M U 6c� m mtiNv v Le 3 iC1 O N �- N tD 40 ViC1 e- O M t,.� to) y V6L N O w ^ N O -e r- Ln r t6 N �66 O O) M M c�D fH O /�♦ T N O M O \� t: a) N N � Ln CD M O Q) a) M tM to � L v6` N O t"7 � T A /� tD N to CO) C rit, f 1T66 Q) too v N t�D 64 ` L T N O M T Gf C a y L4 m N LO ti "t « ■ "6 m N tD 00 N O co v O � t�`L (a V O O O O O �L N O M L W c'M CM M N N c x uoijenlen Y o m m o = E puesnoyl aad �_ o r U C > o L_ p Q p ca a 10 O C O 0 Kent City Council Meeting Date December 9, 2003 Category Other Business I. SUBJECT: 2003 PROPERTY TAX TOTAL LEVY FOR 2004 BUDGET ORDINANCE —ADOPT 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: This ordinances establishes the actual property tax levy, which is based on a statutorily allowed 1% increase for inflation and also includes the amounts estimated for new construction, improvements, increases in state assessed property, other adjustments, and any annexations to the City. The estimated levy is $22,302,436 for the General Fund and $1,775,000 for the Debt Service Funds, for an estimated total of S24,077,436. 3 EXHIBITS: Ordinance 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Operations Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCALIPERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS., 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: p Councilmember �A C.o moves, Councilmember 1 seconds to adopt Ordinance No. establishing the estimated regular property tax levy of $22,302,436 for the General Fund and $1,775,000 for the Debt Service Funds for a total of S2+'9.7�b3* 1 775 a" 2,q 0�3 7 2, DISCUSSION: ACTION: VVAC Council Agenda Item No. 7C ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, levying 2003 property taxes for the 2004 budget for the City of Kent WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 84 55.120 and after providing all appropriate notice, the City Council held a public hearing on September 16, 2003, to l consider the City of Kent's proposed operating and capital budget for the 2004 calendar year, and held a public heanng on November 18,2003,to address the City's 2003 propertyl i tax levy, revenues, and limit factors, as well as the proposed 2004 budget, and WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 84 55 120, any increase to property tax revenue other than that resulting from the addition of new,construction and improvements to property, annexations, and any increase in the v alue of state-assessed property and the refund fund levy,requires the adoption of a separate ordinance from the tax levy ordinance specifically authorizing the increase in terms of both dollars and percentage, and WHEREAS, by separate ordinance, the City Council has adopted an ordinance to establish a one (1) percent increase in property tax revenue to be levied and collected in year 2004; and 1 Property Tax Levie 2004 Budge WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 84.52.010 and WAC 458-12-365, taxes shall be levied in specific dollar amounts; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. — Recitals Incorporaled. The foregoing recitals ar incorporated into this ordinance. SECTION Z — Property Tax Levied. There is hereby levied against the assessed value of the property in the City of Kent, Washington, a tax for the City's 2004 budget in the following amounts for the following funds: A. For the General Fund, for the purpose of paying the general expenses of municipal government. Levy per$1,000 of assessed valuation DollarAmount Fund (estimated) (estimated) General Fund 2 566 S22,302,436 I� B. For Voted Bond Interest and Redemption Fund, for the purpose of pa�ing deb service in the following amounts for the following funds. Levy per$1,000 of assessed valuation DollarAmoun Fund (estimated) (estimated) General Obligation Refunding .204 S1,775,000 (Public Safety and Senior Housing) C. Total General Fund and Voted Bond Interest and Redemption Fund- Levy per $1,000 of assessed valuation Dollar Amoun (estimated) (estimated) TOTAL LEVY 2.771 $24,077,436 2 Property Tax Levied 2004 Budge SECTION 3. - Linutation on Leif. The application of the General Fun levy shall be consistent with and shall not result in a tax reN enue in excess of the limitation imposed by RCW 84 55 010. SECTION 4. - Adjustments City administration shall adnuinster the Annual Budget and in doing so may authorize adjustments pursuant to RCW 35A.33.120 SECTION 5. - Serei'!2 p If any one or more sections, subsections, o sentences of this ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or im alid, such decision shal I not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance and the same shall remai in full force and effect i SECTION 6. - E(fectme Date This ordinance shall take effect and be 'I i force five(5)days from and after its passage,appro�al, and publication as provided by law II f JIM WHITE, MAYOR .ATTEST �I BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK I' �I APPROVED AS TO FORM TOM BRUBAKER, CITY ATTORNEY 3 Property Tax Levied 2004 Budge PASSED: day of December, 2003. APPROVED: day of December, 2003. PUBLISHED: day of December, 2003. I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No. passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the City o Kent as hereon indicated. I (SEAL) BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK t I iI P Gvl ORDIWICE Ta U,cd'_OW Jo i II i I I i li I� 4 Property Tar Levied 2004 Budge Chapter 35A.33.120 RCW - The Washington State Legislature Page 1 of 1 a..•.q. l/1 t'q„- T:fi^LY*"�r1i s'.e m-»per-,..r-- .v..-�"-.-.-.-vc�,^s x—..s...7,A •,. ri a. < _-'� ^1� ,tip^` �.,.,,,•- - •E,^", i;. "7_?6.%. -•i.'`r,p - ''r. •• o 'mot.= SHIRGTD.NI STATE LEGISLATURE � ^ SIP:-Y-' �` =►1�.:"ttk'wz�c. wtt-�i.ia",+3� 4" ittlill litt�t t il: Legislature Home About Us E Mail Lists Search Hem RCW TITLES >> TITLE 35A >> CHAPTER 35A 33>>SECTION 35A 33 120 Print Version 3.5A 33 110 << 35A 33 120 >> 35A 33 122 RCW 35A.33.120 Funds --Limitations on expenditures --Transfers and adjustments. The expenditures as classified and itemized in the final budget shall constitute the city's appropriations for the ensuing fiscal year Unless otherwise ordered by a court of competent jurisdiction, and subject to further limitations imposed by ordinance of the code city, the expenditure of city funds or the incurring of current liabilities on behalf of the city shall be limited to the following (1) The total amount appropriated for each fund in the budget for the current fiscal year, without regard to the individual items contained therein, except that this limitation shall not apply to wage adjustments authorized by RCW 35A 33 105, and (2) The unexpended appropriation balances of a preceding budget which may be carried forward from prior fiscal years pursuant to RCW 35A 33 150, and (3) Funds received from the sale of bonds or warrants which have been duly authorized according to law, and (4) Funds received in excess of estimated revenues during the current fiscal year, when authorized by an ordinance amending the original budget, and (5) Expenditures required for emergencies, as authorized in RCW 35A 33 080 and 35A 33 090 Transfers between individual appropriations within any one fund may be made during the current fiscal year by order of the city's chief administrative officer subject to such regulations, if any, as may be imposed by the city council Notwithstanding the provisions of RCW 43 09 210 or of any statute to the contrary, transfers, as herein authorized, may be made within the same fund regardless of the various offices, departments or divisions of the city which may be affected The city council, upon a finding that it is to the best interests of the code city to decrease, revoke or recall all or any portion of the total appropriations provided for any one fund, may, by ordinance, approved by the vote of one more than the majority of all members thereof, stating the facts and findings for doing so, decrease, revoke or recall all or any portion of an unexpended fund balance, and by said ordinance, or a subsequent ordinance adopted by a like majority, the moneys thus released may be reappropriated for another purpose or purposes, without limitation to department, division or fund, unless the use of such moneys is otherwise restricted by law, charter, or ordinance [1967 ex s c 119§35A 33 120 j htto://www.lea.wa.00v/RCW/indpycfrn?fiicApr-tior=cnrf=cnrf nnP,cn,f,. ,_�17,� inn Chapter 84.52.010 RCW - The Washington State Legislature Page 1 of 3 t� �pl .HIN;G�TON _S,TATELEGISLATUR - ita� ` p!'1•,ttup� , Ks� l� Legislature Home About Us E-Mad Lists Search Help RCW TITLES >> TITLE 84 >> CHAPTER 84 52 >> SECTION 84 52 010 Print Version Beginning of chapter << 84 52 010 >> 84 52 018 RCW 84.52.010 Taxes levied or voted in specific amounts -- Effect of constitutional and statutory limitations - - Use of hypothetical levy. Except as is permitted under RCW 84 55 050, all taxes shall be levied or voted in specific amounts The rate percent of all taxes for state and county purposes, and purposes of taxing districts coextensive with the county, shall be determined, calculated and fixed by the county assessors of the respective counties,within the limitations provided by law, upon the assessed valuation of the property of the county, as shown by the completed tax rolls of the county, and the rate percent of all taxes levied for purposes of taxing districts within any county shall be determined, calculated and fixed by the county assessors of the respective counties, within the limitations provided by law, upon the assessed valuation of the property of the taxing districts respectively When a county assessor finds that the aggregate rate of tax levy on any property, that is subject to the limitations set forth in RCW 84 52 043 or 84 52 050, exceeds the limitations provided in either of these sections, the assessor shall recompute and establish a consolidated levy in the following manner. (1) The full certified rates of tax levy for state, county, county road district, and city or town purposes shall be extended on the tax rolls in amounts not exceeding the limitations established by law, however any state levy shall take precedence over all other levies and shall not be reduced for any purpose other than that required by RCW 84 55 010. If, as a result of the levies imposed under RCW 36 54 130, 84 52 069, 84 34 230, the portion of the levy by a metropolitan park district that was protected under RCW 84 52 120, and 84 52 105, the combined rate of regular property tax levies that are subject to the one percent limitation exceeds one percent of the true and fair value of any property, then these levies shall be reduced as follows- (a)The levy imposed by a ferry district under RCW 36 54 130 must be reduced until the combined rate no longer exceeds one percent of the true and fair value of any property or must be eliminated, (b) if the combined rate of regular property tax levies that are subject to the one percent limitation still exceeds one percent of the true and fair value of any property, the portion of the levy by a metropolitan park district that is protected under RCW 84 52 120 shall be reduced until the combined rate no longer exceeds one percent of the true and fair value of any property or shall be eliminated; (c)if the combined rate of regular property tax levies that are subject to the one percent limitation still exceeds one percent of the true and fair value of any property, then the levies imposed under RCW 84 34 230, 84 52 105, and any portion of the levy imposed under RCW 84 52 069 that is in excess of thirty cents per thousand dollars of assessed value, shall be reduced on a pro rata basis until the combined rate no longer exceeds one percent of the true and fair value of any property or shall be eliminated; and (d) if the combined rate of regular property tax levies that are subject to the one percent limitation still exceeds one percent of the true and fair value of any property, then the thirty cents per thousand dollars of assessed value of tax levy imposed under RCW 84 52 069 shall be reduced until the combined rate no longer exceeds one percent of the true and fair value of any property or eliminated. (2) The certified rates of tax levy subject to these limitations by all junior taxing districts imposing taxes on such property shall be reduced or eliminated as follows to bring the consolidated levy of taxes on such property within the provisions of these limitations Chapter 84.52.010 RCW - The Washington State Legislature Page 2 of 3 (a) First, the certified property tax levy rates of those junior taxing districts authorized under RCW 36 68 525, 36 69 145, 35 95A 100, and 67 38 130 shall be reduced on a pro rata basis or eliminated, (b) Second, if the consolidated tax levy rate still exceeds these limitations, the certified property tax levy rates of flood control zone districts shall be reduced on a pro rata basis or eliminated, (c)Third, if the consolidated tax levy rate still exceeds these limitations, the certified property tax levy rates of all other junior taxing districts, other than fire protection districts, library districts, the first fifty cent per thousand dollars of assessed valuation levies for metropolitan park districts, and the first fifty cent per thousand dollars of assessed valuation levies for public hospital districts, shall be reduced on a pro rata basis or eliminated, (d) Fourth, if the consolidated tax levy rate still exceeds these limitations, the first fifty cent per thousand dollars of assessed valuation levies for metropolitan park districts created on or after January 1, 2002, shall be reduced on a pro rata basis or eliminated, (e) Fifth, if the consolidated tax levy rate still exceeds these limitations, the certified property tax levy rates authorized to fire protection districts under RCW 52 16 140 and 52 16 160 shall be reduced on a pro rata basis or eliminated, and (f) Sixth, if the consolidated tax levy rate still exceeds these limitations, the certified property tax levy rates authorized for fire protection districts under RCW 52 16 130, library districts, metropolitan park districts created before January 1, 2002, under their first fifty cent per thousand dollars of assessed valuation levy, and public hospital districts under their first fifty cent per thousand dollars of assessed valuation levy,shall be reduced on a pro rata basis or eliminated In determining whether the aggregate rate of tax levy on any property, that is subject to the limitations set forth in RCW 84 52 050, exceeds the limitations provided in that section, the assessor shall use the hypothetical state levy, as apportioned to the county under RCW 84 48 080, that was computed under RCW 84 48 080 without regard to the reduction under RCW 84 55 012 [2003 c 83§310 Prior 2002 c 248§ 15,2002 c 88§7, 1995 2nd sp s c 13§4, 1995 c 99§2, 1994 c 124§36, 1993 c 337§4, 1990 c 234§4, 1988 c 274§7, 1987 c 255§1, 1973 1 st ex s c 195§101,1973 1st ex s c 195§ 146, 1971 ex s c 243§6, 1970 ex s c 92§4, 1961 c 15§84 52010,prior 1947 c 270§ 1, 1925 ex s c 130§74, Rem Supp 1947§ 11235,prior 1920 ex s c 3§ 1, 1897 c 71 §62, 1893 c 124§63 1 NOTES: Findings -- Intent --Captions, part headings not law -- Severability -- Effective date -- 2003 c 83: See notes following RCW 36 57A_200 Intent -- 1995 2nd sp s. c 13: See note following RCW 84 55 012 Finding -- 1993 c 337: See note following RCW 84 52 105 Purpose -- 1988 c 274: "The legislature finds that, due to statutory and constitutional limitations, the interdependence of the regular property tax levies of the state, counties, county road districts, cities and towns, and junior taxing districts can cause significant reductions in the otherwise authorized levies of those taxing districts, resulting in serious disruptions to essential services provided by those taxing districts The purpose of this act is to avoid unnecessary reductions in regular property tax revenue without exceeding existing statutory and constitutional tax limitations on cumulative regular property tax levy rates The legislature declares that it is a purpose of the state, counties, county road districts, cities and towns, public hospital districts, library districts, fire protection districts, metropolitan park districts, and other taxing districts to participate in the methods provided by this act by which revenue levels supporting the services provided by all taxing districts might be maintained " [1988 c 274 § 1 ] Severabtltty -- 1988 c 274: "If any provision of this act or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the act or the application of the provision to other persons or circumstances is not affected " [1988 c 274 § 13 ] httD://WWW IPQ vva onv1Rr\A11inr1Qv r'fm7ft 17,31 n,n Chapter 84.52.010 RCW - The Washington State Legislature Page 3 of 3 Severability -- Effective dates and termination dates --Construction — 1973 1st ex.s. c 195: See notes following RCW 84 52 043 Severability — 1971 ex.s. c 243. See RCW 84 34 920 Intent -- 1970 ex.s. c 92: "It is the intent of this 1970 amendatory act to prevent a potential doubling of property taxes that might otherwise result from the enforcement of the constitutionally required fifty percent assessment ratio as of January 1, 1970, and to adjust property tax millage rates for subsequent years to levels which will conform to the requirements of any constitutional amendment imposing a one percent limitation on property taxes It is the further intent of this 1970 amendatory act that the statutory authority of any taxing district to impose excess levies shall not be impaired by reason of the reduction in millage rates for regular property tax levies This 1970 amendatory act shall be construed to effectuate the legislative intent expressed in this section " [1970 ex s. c 92 § 11 Effective date --Application -- 1970 ex s. c 92: 'This act shall take effect July 1, 1970 but shall not affect property taxes levied in 1969 or prior years " [1970 ex s c 92 § 11 ] h H-n• /h.. nnv Inr, rr-i .ten../Dt-1A! 0 0A C ) 01 r) 11 I')r/1r)r),O Chapter 84.55.120 RCW - The Washington State Legislature Page 1 of 1 � - �%li ^'-c-ar'�,.'+eY�.r +^',� �•"�'T'.'^F',^..r�.,�*.�.,— ,. ,q-R*-rT+6- - •��- !`��,.. "aa"4:'i�i�A`^+4 '."L�Sf-t.`Y�.tS..+-e '^• x_x_"`.a't ��,'-�' � -"$,�`s� S».-�.,rtL 'i�-y. "S' .WASHINGT.O,N;SUTE� LEGISLATUR ' ��j.t1,j��I,..i���/' s F11 i% fL'`�it�''.a���Z.a7licw✓...-- ...+ - i Y 'F"y 'wj..` Legislature Home About Us E-Marl Lists Search Help RCW TITLES >> TITLE 84>> CHAPTER 84 55 >> SECTION 84 55 120 Pnrt version 84 55 110 << 84 55 120 >> 84 55 125 RCW 84.55.120 Public hearing --Taxing district's revenue sources --Adoption of tax Increase by ordinance or resolution. A taxing district, other than the state, that collects regular levies shall hold a public hearing on revenue sources for the district's following year's current expense budget. The hearing must Include consideration of possible increases in property tax revenues and shall be held prior to the time the taxing district levies the taxes or makes the request to have the taxes levied The county legislative authority, or the taxing district's governing body If the district is a city, town, or other type of district, shall hold the hearing For purposes of this section, "current expense budget" means that budget which is primarily funded by taxes and charges and reflects the provision of ongoing services It does not mean the capital, enterprise, or special assessment budgets of cities, towns, counties, or special purpose districts If the taxing district is otherwise required to hold a public hearing on its proposed regular tax levy, a single public hearing may be held on this matter No increase in property tax revenue, other than that resulting from the addition of new construction and improvements to property and any increase in the value of state-assessed property, may be authorized by a taxing district, other than the state, except by adoption of a separate ordinance or resolution, pursuant to notice, specifically authorizing the increase in terms of both dollars and percentage The ordinance or resolution may cover a period of up to two years, but the ordinance shall specifically state for each year the dollar increase and percentage change in the levy from the previous year 11997 c 3§209(Referendum Bill No 47,approved November 4,1997), 1995 c 251 §11 NOTES: Severability -- Part headings not law -- Referral to electorate -- 1997 c 3: See notes following RCW 84 40 030 httn•//tvtAmf Ian wa 0MIM 'W/indPy rfmpfucPnrtinn=5ecfinnfLSPctinn=P4 S5 120 11/25/2003 to '�• r to O t� m LO N_ tl N O N J 'd' M m to O to to "Cr N M O M N O r d' O d' d' t`- r- N Ld7 t` m O T- 00 O t` ti t` N M M t` O w w w w O r 04 r d' O N N N N N � � L O t 0 Gi m cz 06 F— X F� ti c L cz A C) O CL .� C� •— �+ sZ ,cc tJ = CL Ocu Q. Z O ell Kent City Council Meeting Date December 9, 2003 Category Other Business 1. SUBJECT: 2004 FINAL BUDGET ADOPTION— ORDINANCE 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: This ordinance adopts the City's 2004 budget. The budget to be adopted is summarized in Exhibit A and includes the Preliminary Budget document as amended by Exhibit B, which constitutes technical corrections made to the Preliminary Budget since its original publication on October 14, 2003. 3. EXHIBITS: Budget summary, technical amendments to Preliminary Budget document, and ordinance 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Operations Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: ) Councilmember W (r(Td(� moves, Councilmember seconds to adopt Ordinance No. �10 adopting the final 2004 Operating and Capital Budget, which includes Exhibits A and B. DISCUSSION: ACTION: �l Council Agenda Item No. 7D ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, relating to budgets and finance and adopting the final 2004 fiscal year budget WHEREAS, the tax estimates and budget for the City of Kent, Washington, for the 2004 fiscal year have been prepared and filed as prox ided by law, and WHEREAS, the budget has been pnnted and distributed; and i i WHEREAS, notice has been published in the official paper of the City o a ( Kent setting the time and place for heanng, and WHEREAS, that notice stated that all taxpayers calling at the office of thel I City Clerk would be furnished a copy of the 2004 budget, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON,DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS. I SECTION]. -Budget Adoption Pursuant to RCW 35A 33 075,the budget for the 2004 fiscal year, as summarized in Exhibit "A" and as set forth in the 2004 Preliminary Comprehensive Budget, which is amended by Exhibit "B," all of which are incorporated into this ordinance by this reference, is hereby adopted in the amounts and for the purposes established in that budget as the final budget for the City's 2004 fiscal year. 1 2004 Budget Adoptio> SECTION2. - Transmittal. The Finance Director shall transmit a complete copy of the final adopted budget to the Division of Municipal Corporations in the Office o the State Auditor and to the Association of Washington Cities. SECTIONS. -Acjusnnents. City administration shall administer the Annual Budget and in doing so may authorize adjustments pursuant to RCW 35A 33.120 SECTION 4. - Severability. If any one or more sections, subsections, o sentences of this ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance and the same shall remain I in full force and effect. I SECTIONS. -Effeetwe Date This ordinance shall take effect and be in force five (5)days from and after the date of passage and publication as provided by law I ! JIM WHITE, MAYOR � ATTEST: BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: TOM BRUBAKER, CITY ATTORNEY 2 2004 Budget Adoptio► i iPASSED: day of December, 2003. APPROVED: day of December, 2003. PUBLISHED: day of December, 2003. I I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, and appro�ed by the Mayor of the City of Kent as hereon indicated. (SEAL) BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK � I I II{ IP .I Wll\.\\1IL..Yn !. Y 11 I III "'� 3 2004 Budget Adoptio 2004 Budget Ordinance DRAFT Exhibit A Inc(Dec) Beginning Ending in Fund Fund Fund Revenues Expenditures Balance Balance Balance GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS GENERAL FUND 61,360,291 62,793,185 (1,432,894) 4.840,075 3,407,181 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS Street 3,832,646 3,664,609 168,037 514.867 682,904 Lodging Tax Fund 121,794 154,054 (32,260) 65,447 33,187 Youth/Teen Programs 609,514 609.514 53,980 53,980 Capital Improvement 8,705,886 8,521,752 184,134 703,325 887,459 Criminal Justice 2,399,529 2,634,640 (235,111) 666,412 431,301 Environmental Mitigation 148,492 175,201 (26,709) 231.666 204,957 Community Block Grant 973,000 973,000 Other Operating Protects 43,500 43,500 DEBT SERVICE FUNDS Voted 1,785,000 1,780,628 4,372 8,030 12,402 Counctlmanic 7.665,023 7,665,023 Special Assessment 2,612,124 2,722,308 (110,184) 2,116,204 2,006,020 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS Street Protects 1.023,000 1,023,000 Parks Protects 1,971,772 1,971,772 Facilities Projects 80,000 80,000 Technology Projects 300,000 300,000 PROPRIETARY FUNDS ENTERPRISE FUNDS Water 8,722,254 8,942,376 (220,122) 2.023,123 1,803,001 Sewerage 23,587,183 22,577,704 1,009,479 1,250,295 2,259,774 Golf Complex 3,314.000 2,962,456 351,544 109,992 461,536 INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS Equipment Rental 2,896,984 2,917,731 (20,747) 2,587,876 2.567,129 Central Services 4,577,744 4,561,251 16,493 145,415 161.908 Fire Equipment 443,281 600,000 (156,719) 306,211 149,492 Facilities Fund 4,089,315 4,227.159 (137,844) 167,239 29,395 Insurance 13,090,016 12,864,984 225,032 2,270,611 2,495,643 FIDUCIARY FUNDS TRUST AND AGENCY FUNDS Foremen's Pension 209,525 276,180 (66,655) 3,671,905 3,605,250 Economic Development Corp 4,825 7,222 (2,397) 27.437 25,040 TOTAL GROSS BUDGET 154,566,698 155,049,249 (482,551) 21.760,110 21,277,559 LESS. Internal Service Funds 24.106,812 24,106,812 Other Transfers 12,335,882 12,335,882 TOTAL BUDGET 118,124,004 118,606,555 (482,551) 21,760,110 21,277,559 CITY OF KENT,WASHINGTON 2004 Budget Ordinance DRAFT Exhibit B Inc(Dec) Beginning Ending in Fund Fund Fund Revenues Expenditures Balance Balance Balance GOVERNMENTALFUNDS GENERAL FUND 61,406,072 62,731,824 (1,325,752) 4,840,075 3,514,323 Property tax-assessed valuation Technical correction senior trips (45.781) (45,781) (45,781) Position moved to street&utilities (104,000) 104,000 104,000 Sales tax streamlining 25,000 (25,000) (25,000) Suburban Cities dues correction 5,288 (5,28B) (5,288) Correct cost allocations 135 073 (135,073) (135,073) Total General Fund 61,360,291 62,793,185 (1,432,894) 4,840,075 3,407,181 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS Street 4,610,595 4,790,978 (180,383) 912,118 731,735 Position moved hom General Fund 26,000 (26,000) (26,000) Adjust Debt Service 154,527 (154 527) (154,527) Remove 775 revenues!projects (777 949) (1 306 896) 528 947 (397 251) 131 696 Total Street Fund 3,832,646 3,664,609 168,037 514,867 682,904 Lodging Tax Fund 121,794 121,000 794 794 Adjust Debt Service (7,596) 7,596 7,596 Adjustments percommittee request 40650 (40650) 65,447 24,797 Total Lodging Tax Fund 121,794 154,054 (32,260) 65,447 33,187 Youth[Teen Programs 609,514 609 514 53 980 53 980 Capital Improvement Fund 8,705,886 8,784,246 (78,360) 703,325 624,965 Adjust Debt Service (262 494) 262,494 262 494 Total Capital Improvement Fund 8,705,886 8,521,752 18.4,134 703,325 887,459 Criminal Justice 2,399,529 2,624,640 (225,111) 656412 431,301 Overlooked defibrilators-seized assets 10 000 (10,000) 10 000 Total Criminal Justice Mitigation Fund 2,399,529 2,634,640 (235,111) 666,412 431,301 Environmental Mitigation 148492 175201 (26,709) 231,666 204,957 Community Block Grant 973,000 973,000 Other Operating Projects 43,500 43,500 DEBT SERVICE FUNDS Voted 1,785,000 1.780,628 4 372 8,030 12,402 Councdmanic 7,7B0,586 7,780,586 Adjust Debt Service (115,563) (115 563) Total Councilmanic Debt Service Fund 7,665,023 7,665,023 Special Assessment 2,612,124 2,722,308 (110,184) 2,116,204 2,006,020 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS Street Projects 2,438,000 2,438,000 1-776 Reduction (1,415,000) (1,415000) Total Street Capital Projects Fund 1,023,000 1,023,000 • Parks Projects 1,971,772 1,971,772 Facilities Projects 80,000 80,000 Technology Projects 300,000 300,000 CITY OF KENT,WASHINGTON 2004 Budget Ordinance DRAFT Exhibit B Inc(Dec) Beginning Ending In Fund Fund Fund Revenues Expenditures Balance Balance Balance PROPRIETARY FUNDS ENTERPRISE FUNDS Water 8,722,254 8,916,376 (194,122) 2,023,123 1,829,001 Position moved from General Fund 26,000 (26,000) (26,000) Total Water Fund 8,722,254 8,942.376 (220.122) 2,023.123 1,803,001 Sewerage 23,587,183 22,525,704 1,061,479 1,250,295 2,311,774 Positron moved from General Fund 52,000 (52,000) (52,000) Total Sewer Fund 23,587,183 22,577,704 1,009,479 1,250,295 2,259,774 Golf Complex 3,314,000 3,097,529 216,471 109,992 326,463 correction of cost allocations (135,073) 135,073 135,073 Total Golf Complex Fund 3,314,000 2,962,456 351,544 109,992 461,536 INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS Equipment Rental 2,896,984 2,618,933 278,051 2,587,876 2,865,927 Correction to auto parts 298,798 (298,798) (298,798) Total Equipment Rental Fund 2,896,984 2,917,731 (20,747) 2,587,876 2,567,129 Central Services 4,577,744 4,561,251 16,493 145,415 161,908 Fire Equipment 443,281 600,000 (156,719) 306,211 149,492 Facilities Fund 4,089,315 4,227,159 (137,844) 167,239 29,395 Insurance 13,090,016 12,864,984 225.032 2,270,611 2,495,643 Liability Insurance fund-legal fees 25,000 (25,000) (25,000) (50,000) IBNR adjustment (25,000) 25,000 25,000 50000 Total Insurance Fund 13,090,016 12,864,984 225,032 2,270,611 2,495,643 FIDUCIARY FUNDS TRUST AND AGENCY FUNDS Firemen's Pension 209,525 276,180 (66,655) 3,671,905 3,605,250 Economic Development Corp 4,825 7,222 (2,397) 27,437 25,040 TOTAL GROSS BUDGET 154,566,598 155,049,249 (482,551) 21.760,110 21,277,559 LESS Internal Service Funds 24,106,812 24,106.812 Other Transfers 12,335,882 12,335,882 TOTAL BUDGET 118,124,004 118,606,555 (482,551) 21,760,110 21,277,559 Chapter 35A.33.070 RCW - The Washington State Legislature Page 1 of 1 �.�, WASH( 1G_10 ;S,TATE LEG.ISLATUR Legislature Home About Us E Mail Lists Search Help RCW TITLES >> TITLE 35A >> CHAPTER 35A 33>>SECTION 35A 33 070 Print Version 35A 33 060 << 35A 33 070 >> 35A 33 075 RCW 35A.33 070 Budget -- Hearing The council shall meet on the day fixed by RCW 35A 33 060 for the purpose of fixing the final budget of the city at the time and place designated In the notice thereof Any taxpayer may appear and be heard for or against any part of the budget. The hearing may be continued from day to day but not later than the twenty-fifth day prior to commencement of the city's fiscal year (1967 ex s c 119§35A 33 070] htti)://www.lec.wa.cov/RCW/index.cfm?fuseaction=section&section=35A 33 n70 11/?5/?0m Chapter 35A.33.075 RCW - The Washington State Legislature Page 1 of 1 .•+S�.r� V,y'l�{'�^N ,_�, ....: ..-�s�'`i�;'L"""•`_ �.Y` .�9L! '�<= � � W,1S.H NGT,ON'STATE LEGISL!QATURE .Nd-.r.�`E+i��«.i>��'+�ab"�u.r "r.�r,,._.. �«�. .•..�d'ie::$it.Fi.".''•e4: ro�#34°'.•+� Legislature Home About Us E-Mail Lists Search Help RCW TITLES >> TITLE 35A >> CHAPTER 35A 33>>SECTION 35A 33 075 Print Version 35A 33 070 << 35A 33 075 >> 35A 33 080 RCW 35A.33.075 Budget adoption. Following conclusion of the hearing, and prior to the beginning of the fiscal year, the legislative body shall make such adjustments and changes as it deems necessary or proper and after determining the allowance in each item, department, classification and fund, and shall by ordinance, adopt the budget in its final form and content Appropriations shall be limited to the total estimated revenues contained therein including the amount to be raised by ad valorem taxes and the unencumbered fund balances estimated to be available at the close of the current fiscal year Such ordinances may adopt the final budget by reference PROVIDED, That the ordinance adopting such budget shall set forth in summary form the totals of estimated revenues and appropriations for each separate fund and the aggregate totals for all such funds combined A complete copy of the final budget as adopted shall be transmitted to the state auditor, and to the association of Washington cities 11995 c 301 §53, 1969 ex s c 81§3, 1967 ex s c 119§35A 33 G75] NOTES: Effective date -- 1969 ex.s. c 81: See note following RCW 35A 13_035 httn-/Iwri F n, Icon Iva nnv/Rr'1A16nr1nY rfm7fumar+inn-cortinnRcontinn_ SSA 77 n75 11 /?S/7mm Chapter 35A.33.120 RCW - The Washington State Legislature Page 1 of 1 — w�� — -T---� -n �J1I, � -i»�.a..:ve},r..- nc-Wf,;x��»- •-y�-e;s� .•va�.p'.�S^"" "a^E,^�,wQ.dr' 1,. .. .,u„` sv''�! Y h WASHINIGT XSTATE, LEGISLATUR `�'"�!j jlllilCIII Lac jislature Home About Us E-Mail Lists Search Hem RCW TITLES >>TITLE 35A>> CHAPTER 35A 33>> SECTION 35A 33 120 Print Version 35A 33 110 << 35A 33 120 >> 35A 33 122 RCW 35A.33.120 Funds -- Limitations on expenditures --Transfers and adjustments. The expenditures as classified and itemized in the final budget shall constitute the city's appropriations for the ensuing fiscal year Unless otherwise ordered by a court of competent jurisdiction, and subject to further limitations imposed by ordinance of the code city, the expenditure of city funds or the incurring of current liabilities on behalf of the city shall be limited to the following (1) The total amount appropriated for each fund in the budget for the current fiscal year, without regard to the individual items contained therein, except that this limitation shall not apply to wage adjustments authorized by RCW 35A 33 105, and (2) The unexpended appropriation balances of a preceding budget which may be carried forward from prior fiscal years pursuant to RCW 35A 33 150, and (3) Funds received from the sale of bonds or warrants which have been duly authorized according to law, and (4) Funds received in excess of estimated revenues during the current fiscal year, when authorized by an ordinance amending the original budget, and (5) Expenditures required for emergencies, as authorized in RCW 35A 33.0.80 and 35A 33 090 Transfers between individual appropriations within any one fund may be made during the current fiscal year by order of the city's chief administrative officer subject to such regulations, if any, as may be imposed by the city council Notwithstanding the provisions of RCW 43 09 210 or of any statute to the contrary, transfers, as herein authorized, may be made within the same fund regardless of the various offices, departments or divisions of the city which may be affected The city council, upon a finding that it is to the best interests of the code city to decrease, revoke or recall all or any portion of the total appropriations provided for any one fund, may, by ordinance, approved by the vote of one more than the majority of all members thereof, stating the facts and findings for doing so, decrease, revoke or recall all or any portion of an unexpended fund balance, and by said ordinance, or a subsequent ordinance adopted by a like majority, the moneys thus released may be reappropriated for another purpose or purposes, without limitation to department, division or fund, unless the use of such moneys is otherwise restricted by law, charter, or ordinance (1967 ex s c 119§35A 33 1201 htto•//www lea wa.aov/RCW/mdex,cfm?fuseactlon=section&section=35A.33.120 11/25/2003 Kent City Council Meeting Date December 9, 2003 Category Other Business 1. SUBJECT: OUTSIDE UTILITY SERVICE ORDINANCE — ADOPT 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: The proposed ordinance amends Ch. 7.11 of the Kent City Code to separate and clarify what the City will require in order to provide utility service to properties located outside the City limits and either within or outside the City's potential annexation area. This matter was considered and approved by the Public Works Committee at its December 11 2003, meeting, but was set for the "other business" calendar in order to clarify the modifications made to this ordinance as compared to existing code. The ordinance included within the packet by public works did not indicate by underline new language added to Ch. 7.11 of the Kent City Code. 3. EXHIBITS: Ordinance, memorandum and Public Works Minutes 3/12/01 • 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Director and Staff (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: S SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds to adopt Ordinance No-421 amending Ch. 7.11 of the Kent City Code regarding the terms and conditions under which the City will provide utility service to properties located outside the City limits Ct4N 2-y.d4J DISCUSSION: aA ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 7E ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, amending Ch 7.11 of the Kent City Code, entitled "Utility service outside the city," to clarify conditions for the provision of utility services to properties located outside the City limits WHEREAS, RCW 35 67 310 allows the City to provide utility sern ice to properties located outside the City limits upon terms and conditions established by ordinance, and WHEREAS, Ch 7.11 of the Kent City Code contains the City's current code provisions regarding utility, service outside the City, which was last amended ml I`o%ember 1990; and WHEREAS this ordinance amends Ch 7 11 of the Kent City Code to separate and clarify what the City will require in order to proN ide utility services to properties located outside the City limits, but within the City's potential annexation area, and when providing utility services to properties located outside the City limits and outside the City's potential annexation area, NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS i Ch. 7.11 KCC- Utility Service Outside the City of Kent SECTION 1. — Amendment. Chapter 7 11 of the Kent City Code, entitled "Utility service outside the city," is amended as follows: Chapter 7.11. UTILITY SERVICE OUTSIDE THE CITY Sec. 7.11.010. Within potential annexation area..' ^^ dtsign *d. The City j may will fiet-provide utility services to properties located outside City limits, but within the City's potential annexation area, the exeeption efthese afeas m ithin the J P. ..J. sr if the property owner requesting such service covenants and agrees as follows. 1. The owner will enter into a "no-protest to annexation" agreement, ikhich the City will record v�rth the King County Recorder's Office in Nshich the owner will give notice of the owner's intent to annex and �Nill petition for annexation of the property to the City_ , under any statutory annexation method now enacted or subsequently enacted, that im olives a petition process in order to effect the annexation. The notice and petition "Hill constitute a covenant that runs with the owner's property and will applv at the time the owner's I t13eff property is included within any area that -A hic•rthe City is considermg is bet+ eefisfdffedfor annexation The notice and petition agreement will state that, upon annexation the property will be assessed and taxed at the same rate and on the same basis as property within the City is assessed and taxed, and will include any outstanding indebtedness of the City_contracted prior to or existing at the time of annexation Further, this notice and petition will only be accepted by !be eiiy under terms and conditions established by the City through the public works department and consistent with the provisions of this chapter. 2 Ch. 7.11 KCC- Utility Service Outside the City of Kent city is assessed and t. ..t a .. r to or existing taxed, at the tinne of annenativii. 23. The owners will agree to design and construct all public improi•ements to meet or exceed City subdivision and construction standards The City's public works director, or his or her designee, depaAwie�reserves 4sthe right to �whhold providing sanitary sewer-, &nd or water service until the public improN ements have been constructed in accordance with such standards. 34 The owners will agree to provide the City with mylar-reproducible or other acceptable as-built construction drawings of the public improvements prior to initiating building construction on any lot within anv tlte-proposed subdivision of the property The City shall have the right to inspect all construction Mork dunng and after completion Anv work found not to have been constructed in accordance with City construction standards, as determined by the public works director or his or her designee, shall be corrected by oxvner at the owner's sole cost and expense I I 4- The evrf,eFs agree that de, elepn3ent-e€ the ,n H^}e , i and ^ffie system The owners will agree and covenant tha! they auto participate in the cost of constructing required improv ements determined to be necessary by the City, including impacts to the City's streets, roads, and traffic system and to the Citv's i creeks, streams, and drainage system, and paa`ment of aproportionate share of all costs associated with the construction of the road and traffic system improvements as determined by the City. These improvements actions must be completed to the City's satisfaction prior to the City providing utility service 6 The ewneF shall agree ie pay a pFopef4ionaie shaFe f all ee associated with the-eenstFuetien of the Fead and traffic system ifflPfoveHieiits as i I 3 Ch. 7.11 XCC- Utility Service Outside the City of Kent ♦iV YV11Jll U\.11V1• 57. The requirements of this section will act as Ccovenants and promises cntained in suchagfeementsthat will shall-run with the land and shal•}-be binding upon all parties and successors in interest having or acquiring any right, title, or interest in the property and the improvements described in any agreement. 68. The owners will agree that, should it fail to comply with any of the covenants ore€ any agreements executed with the City, the City may, at its sole discretion, terminate the ma's-utility services provided to the owner. I 79. The aAneFs ^g_ e ilia; the annexation areas subject to these agreements shall be consistent with appheable subafea latid kise plans aiid the City's e�Eye comprehensive plan; preN•ded lie o. _ that the OWFIo_,. fiii4,r_ iha until ...,r, and with the C4yCity's long-range planning goals, as— ha4-43e determined by the plann ing I manager difecter-, ^„d �' `Jhe City may withhold full implementation of the comprehensive land use plan map designations in its annexation zoning proposals in i order to achieve a more orderly physical development pattern and to implement its goals of twenty(20) percent density reduction in multifamily residential areas I' 84-0. The owners will state in its 4teff-ap2lication for utility service or in its 1 notice and petition for annexation the existing King County zoning designation in order to a»d—certify that it is consistent with the City's plan as de4eFmmed by the „i^„„•„ direr,.,. „,•i eh time as the ,nnn 1993 comprehensive plan update is complete. Section 7.11.020. Outside Potential Annexation Area In accordance with RCW 35.67.310, as currently enacted or hereafter amended or recodified, the City may provide utility services to properties located outside City limits and outside the City's 4 Cit. 7.11 KCC- Utility Service Outside the City of Kent potential annexation area if the property owner requesting such service covenants and agrees,in writing, to the following requirements: 1 The owner agrees that development of the property may create significant impacts on the City, including impacts to the City's streets roads and traffic system and to the City's creeks streams and drainage system The owner will agree and covenant that it will participate in the cost of constructing required improvements determined to be necessary by the City These actions must be i completed to the City's satisfaction pnor to the City providing utility service to the subject property 2 The owner agrees and covenants that it will mitigate its impact upon the Citv's stone drainaee system in those areas deemed appropriate by the City's public j works director, or his or her designee Mitigation may be by implementing the off-site mitigation improvements deemed necessary by the City, by paNing to the Citv an i amount equivalent to the estimated cost of construction of the necessary improiements in order to mitigate the impact upon the City's system due to development of owner's property, or by other appropriate mitigation procedures In those instances where impacts to a major or regional protect is involved, the mN ner shall pay a prorated share as determined appropriate by the City Construction of any mitigating improiements shall meet or exceed Citv construction standards and shall be further made in iaccordance with this subsection 3 The owner shall agree to pay a proportionate share of all costs associated with the construction of the road and traffic system improvements as determined by the City. Further, where the subiect propertv abuts and takes access off of a City street, the owner agrees to improve the property's frontage to City standards as outlined in the City's construction standards The owner shall submit plans of the frontage improvements to the City for reN iew and approN al along xvith providing molar reproducible or other acceptable as-built construction drawings upon completion The City shall have the right to inspect the construction work dunng and after completion 5 Ch. 7.11 KCC- Utility Service Outside the City of Kent Any work found not to have been constructed in accordance with the Citv's construction standards, as determined by the City's public works director or his or her designee, shall be corrected by owner at owner's expense. These frontage improvements must be completed or bonded to the satisfaction of the City pnor to the City providing utility service to the property. 4. The owner agrees that the covenants and promises contained in these agreements shall run with the land and shall be binding upon all parties and successors in interest having or acquiring any right, title, or interest in the property and improvements descnbed in any agreement. 5. The owner agrees that, should it fail to comply with any of the covenants or any of the agreements executed with the City, the City may, at its sole I discretion, terminate the utility services provided to owner 6. For those properties seeking City utility senice that would affect an upstream tributary of a drainage watershed area that is subiect, all or in part, to City regulation or control, and which is serviced, all or in part, by the City's storm and surface water utility, the following additional requirements A ill also apply: i (a) The owner will design and construct all public andlorprivate storm \Nater detention and water quality treatment system(s) ("drainage system(s)") in a manner that meets or exceeds City construction standards as determined by the public works department. The City's public works director, or his or her designee, reserves I his or her right to withhold sanitary sewer and water service until the drainage system(s) have been constructed in accordance with these standards. (b) The owner will submit all construction plans for the drainage system(s) associated with the development to the City for its review and approial prior to initiating development work on the property. The owner will provide the City with mylar-reproducible or other acceptable as-built construction drawings of the drainage 6 Ch. 7.11 KCC- Utility Service Outside the City of Kent system(s) after they have been constructed The owner will grant the City the right to enter the owner's property at anytime in order to inspect any construction work during design or construction or after its completion. Any work found not to have been constructed in accordance A ith City construction standards as determined by the public works director or his or her designee shall be corrected by the OAner at its sole cost and expense. (c) The owner will pay any permit review fees deemed appropnate by the public works director The owner must grant to the City a nght of access to inspect continuing operations and maintenance of the drainage system(s) to assare they are being operated and maintained properly If the drainage system(s) are not i maintained or operated properly, the owner agrees to promptly bring the utility facilities into compliance with Citv standards (d) Where deemed appropriate by the public xxorks director, or his or her designee, owner's propertv may be subject to the same terms and conditions as those properties located within City limits, including but not limited to sen ice charges in accordance with Ch 7 05 of the Kent Citv Code, as currently enacted or as hereafter amended or recodified from time to time SECTION?. - Severabiiur if any one or more section, subsections, or, sentences of this ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the Validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance and tie same shall remain in full force and effect. I I SECTION 3. - Effectn,e Date This ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days from and after its passage as provided by law JIM WHITE, MAYOR 7 Ch. 7.11 KCC- Utithy Service Outside the City of Kent ATTEST: BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM. TOM BRUBAKER, CITY ATTORNEY PASSED: day of December, 2003. APPROVED: day of December, 2003 PUBLISHED: day of December, 2003. j I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No passed by the City council of the City of Kent, Washington, and approved by the mayor of the City of Kent as hereon indicated. i II (SEAL) BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK I. j j 8 Ch. 7.11 KCC- Utility Service Outside the City of Kent PUBLIC WORICS DEPARTMENT Don E Wukstrom, KENT P E Public Works Director W•�X,N GTON Phone 253-856-5500 Fa-x 253-856-6500 Address 220 Fourth Avenue S Kent, WA 98032-5S95 DATE: December 2, 2003 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Don Wickstrom, Public Works Director SUBJECT: Utility Services Outside City Limits MOTION: Recommend Council adopt the proposed ordinance that amends Ch. 7.11 of the Kent City Code to clarify conditions for the provision of utility services to properties located outside City limits. SUMMARY: RCW 35 67 310 allows the City to provide utility service to properties located outside City limits, upon terms and conditions established by ordinance Chapter 7 11 of the Kent City Code contains the City's current code provisions regarding utility service provided outside the City However, these provisions were last amended more than thirteen (13) years ago—in November 1990. The proposed ordinance amends Ch 7 11 of the Kent City Code to separate and clarify what the City will require in order to provide utility service to properties located outside the City limits, but within the City's potential annexation area, and when providing utility service to properties located outside the City limits and outside the City's potential annexation area BUDGET IMPACT: None BACKGROUND: The City has a long history dating back to 1972 (Resolution No 718-A) of dictating under what conditions the City would be willing to provide utility service (sewer and/or water) outside its corporate limits In the mid 1980's these conditions were subsequently incorporated into a City Ordinance (Ordinance No 2676 and 2696) which has since only been amended once in 1990 Since that time a lot has changed Cities such as SeaTac and Covington have incorporated The Growth Management Act was enacted and Kent now has agreements with its surrounding jurisdictions regarding its designated Potential Annexation Areas (PAA) All this leads to the fact as shown on the attached map that the City's utility system which once was only anticipated to service unincorporated areas that potentially would be annexed now services areas that are either in other jurisdictions or their PAA's As such this proposed ordinance addresses this change along with the recent changes to the State's annexation law It should be noted while providing utility service to areas in other jurisdictions or their respective PAA's we are still proposing to retain authority over certain potential development aspects (drainage and Iraffic) which would impact Kent The importance of this came to light with Polygon's proposed condo development within the City of SeaTac just west of 42"d Ave and Northerly of S 216"' St which abuts Kent's city limits Here Kent gets both the storm drainage and traffic impacts associated with the development without any reserve base to address same However, when Council approved providing sewer service to this area it was understood that these impacts would be addressed and this ordinance assures that the City is on solid ground to do so V 1WIWOTW3-0111E SM ETS�� twt 22 LL a ovg Sv oz W Y oQ NO UNO 6W Y Y; OQ d a J I � 1 JJ 4 PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE MINUTES December 1, 2003 COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Tim Clark , Rico Yingling, Julie Peterson The meeting was called to order by Committee Chair Tim Clark at 5 02 P M Approval of Minutes of November 3, 2003 Committee Member Julie Peterson moved to approve the minutes of November 3, 2003 The motion was seconded by Committee member Rico Yingling and passed 3-0 Vehicle and Equipment Surplus Public Works Director Don Wickstrom said the listed equipment/vehicles comply with current replacement policy guidelines and have been replaced The items will be sold at auction or sold to smaller cities Alice Conrad, Fleet Superintendent was present at the meeting to answer any questions Rico Yingling moved to recommend the Council authorize the staff to appropriately dispose of the equipment as described and listed in the memorandum dated November 12, 2003. The motion was seconded by Julie Peterson and passed 3-0. Utilitv Service Outside Citv Limits Ordinance Public Works Director Don Wickstrom said Public Works is proposing to amend the City Code and bring it up to date This section of the code was last updated in 1990 Since then many things have changed concerning both the annexation laws and the City's future corporate boundary limits Wickstrom noted that with the recent court decision and subsequent legislative action the annexation laws have changed Further, with the 1990 Growth Management Act and the incorporation of new cities such as Seatac the City's utilities sern ice area now extends beyond our future corporate boundaries The proposed changes address both these issues Wickstrom showed a map denoting the areas effected by the changes. Wickstrom also noted that for those service areas lying within other jurisdiction's or their respective PAAs the department was proposing to retain the right to require traffic and drainage mitigation in conjunction with providing utility service. Brett Vinson Assistant City Attorney was present to answer questions Committee member Rico Yingling asked if it was legal to have someone requesting services sign a No Protest Agreement Brett Vinson stated that RCW 35 67 310 allows the City to provide utility service to properties located outside the City limits upon terms and conditions established by ordinance Both statutory and case law authority allow us to do this. Committee Chair Tim Clark asked Wickstrom what caused the changes to be needed Wickstrom said when this was originally set up it was assumed that all properties serviced by city utilities would eventually be part of the city This is not so today Our service area now includes other jurisdictions such as Seatac or their designated Potential Annexation Areas such as Auburn's 2 Julie Peterson asked about the copy of the Ordinance that was included with the packet The text that had been deleted was lined out but the text that was added was not noted She requested an amended copy Brett Vinson said he would provide all Council Members an amended copy so they could review the document and have the item placed on the Other Business section of the agenda for the December 9`1' City Council Meeting Wickstrom denoted that the section 7 11 010 is basically the original ordinance and section 7 11 020 is all new Julie Peterson moved to have the Utility Service Outside City Limits Ordinance placed on the Other Business agenda at the December 91h City Council meeting with the provision we see the amended draft ordinance. The motion was seconded b% Rico Yingling and passed 3-0. Council Member Rico Yingling said it would be his last Public Works Committee meeting and he wanted to thank Chair Tim Clark for all of his hard work on the committee and leadership He also wanted to thank Don Wickstrom and his staff for the great work they do in the City of Kent Rico said the citizens of Kent have a lot to be proud of in what you have accomplished Rico said he was pleased to ha%e been on the Public Works Committee for his entire 6 years on the City Council The meeting adjourned at 5 24 P M Janet Perschek Administrative Assistant ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, amending Ch 7 11 of the Kent City Code, entitled "Utility service outside the city," to clarify conditions for the provision of utility services to properties located outside the City limits WHEREAS, RCW 35 67 310 allows the City to provide utility service to properties located outside the City limits upon terms and conditions established by ordinance, and WHEREAS, Ch 7 11 of the Kent City Code contains the City's current code provisions regarding utility service outside the City, which was last amended in November 1990, and WHEREAS, this ordinance amends Ch 7 11 of the Kent City Code to separate and clarify what the City will require in order to provide utility services to properties located outside the City limits, but within the City's potential annexation area, and when providing utility services to properties located outside the City limits and outside the City's potential annexation area, NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS 1 Ch. 7.11 KCC- Utility Service Outside the City of Kent SECTION 1. — Amendment Chapter 7 11 of the Kent City Code, entitled"Utility service outside the city," is amended as follows. Chapter 7.11. UTILITY SERVICE OUTSIDE THE CITY Sec. 7.11.010. Within potential annexation area.Area designated, The City may will not provide utility services to properties located outside City limits, but within the City's potential annexation area, smde t e linitts of the cit�, NN,th Fe' ti Nan puFpeses as de ted by r of Lion rile s if the property owner requesting such service covenants and agrees as follows 1 The owner will enter into a "no-protest to annexation" agreement, which the City will record with the King County Recorder's Office, in which the owner will give notice of the owner's intent to annex and will petition for annexation of the property to the City and ttiN e noij e of •^'eT' to aiii e-under any statutory annexation method now enacted, or subsequently enacted, that mNohes a petition process in order to effect the annexation The notice and petition will constitute a covenant that runs with the owner's property and will apply at the time the owner's 4+,-ff property is included within any area that wlt+eh the City is considering is i eif c0 , er d for annexation The notice and petition agreement will state that, upon annexation, the property will be assessed and taxed at the same rate and on the same basis as property within the City is assessed and taxed, and will include any outstanding indebtedness of the City contracted prior to or existing at the time of annexation Further, this notice and petition will only be accepted by the City under terms and conditions established by the City through the public works department and consistent with the provisions of this chapter 2 Ch. 7.11 KCC- Utility Service Outside the City of Kent t 1S assessed d tahed7 ili tEl an� ..tSt.,,,,7..,,,a ,debtednerS Of the Elp, e D at the lime 23 The owners will agree to design and construct all public improvements to meet or exceed City subdivision and construction standards The City's public works director, or his or her designee, dep�reserves +tsthe right to withhold providing sanitary sewer.and or water service until the public improvements have been constructed in accordance with such standards 34 The owners will agree to provide the City with mylar-reproducible or other acceptable as-built construction drawings of the public improvements prior to initiating building construction on any lot within any the-proposed subdivision of the property The City shall have the right to inspect all construction work during and after completion Any work found not to have been constructed in accordance with City construction standards, as determined by the public works director or his or her designee, shall be corrected by owner at the owner's sole cost and expense 45 Tile—cw-=2i;—ag!tL illat cc, clof3li=tHt of the "r"" -ty '.ill iii it r amid ira ffie system The owners will agree and covenant ikiet--they-wi44to participate in the cost of constructing required improvements determined to be necessary by the City, including impacts to the City's streets, roads, and traffic system and to the City's creeks, streams, and drainage system, and payment of a proportionate share of all costs associated with the construction of the road and traffic system improvements as determined by the City These improvements ���rmust be completed to the City's satisfaction prior to the City providing utility service to the subjeet P.OPe@4� y The 81AHef ,h ,il agree to pit), a pfopautionate ,i,. Of ail ,t,. associated with the eenitruciion R4 th road „7 f—Ale ,. eniesis-as determined h the it.. The iiiethed F dete!-flisfilfigthe �tfi u,.tiefi t.+ �a "�ctrittc tt.utivta tvmutu 3 Ch. 7.11 KCC- Utility Service Outside the City of Kent i ponof Stich nnpraN ements shall be i,. e6 upon a r;, ,i. �f .,,a i, the three..! of p blie , T „a,s � 5-7 The requirements of this section will act as Ccovenants and promises eontatiied m sueh ag ,_.inen..that will shall-run with the land and 43d44-be binding upon all parties and successors in interest having or acquiring any right, title, or interest in the property and the improvements described in any agreement 68 The owners will agree that, should it fail to comply with any of the covenants oro­f any agreements executed with the City, the City may, at its sole discretion, terminate the eit—' utihty services provided to the owner 79 The o wnefs ,tg+ee-thatthe annexation areas subject to these agreements shall be consistent with ;.},pheable stibf:ea i^^' use planq and the City's c+tNvv'de comprehensive plan . Fw.i6ed h,.,. ... ._ that the r.-d4ei .,,Fee that aiiiii saell time ds .,, ,non i 9 2 --onlprehensf,,e plan t, to t< and with the C-"City's long-range planning goals, as shall he determined by the planning manager diFeCtOr, alid ti d' tThe City may withhold full implementation of the comprehensive land use plan map designations in its annexation zoning proposals in order to achieve a more orderly physical development pattern and to implement its goals of twenty (20) percent density reduction in multifamily residential areas 840 The owners will state in its theif-application for utility service or in its notice and petition for annexation the existing King County zoning designation in order to and-certify that it is consistent with the City's flu i a-,de 'one du or until c4i- �., flie 19 0-493-comprehensive plan-+i ate---is eolnple4e Section 7.11.020. Outside Potential Annexation Area. In accordance with RCW 35 67 310, as currently enacted or hereafter amended or recodified, the City may provide utility services to properties located outside City limits and outside the City's 4 Cit. 7.11 KCC- Utility Service Outside the City of Kent potential annexation area, if the property owner requesting such service covenants and agrees, in writing,to the following requirements: 1 The owner agrees that development of the property may create significant impacts on the City, including impacts to the City's streets, roads, and traffic system and to the City's creeks, streams, and drainage system. The owner will agree and covenant that it will participate in the cost of constructing required improvements determined to be necessary by the City These actions must be completed to the City's satisfaction prior to the City providing utility service to the subject property 2 The owner agrees and covenants that it will mitigate its impact upon the City's storm drainage system in those areas deemed appropriate by the City's public works director, or his or her designee Mitigation may be by implementing the off-site mitigation improvements deemed necessary by the City, by paying to the City an amount equivalent to the estimated cost of construction of the necessary improvements in order to mitigate the impact upon the City's system due to development of owner's property, or by other appropriate mitigation procedures In those instances where impacts to a major or regional project is involved, the owner shall pay a prorated share as determined appropriate by the City Construction of any mitigating improvements shall meet or exceed City construction standards and shall be further made in accordance with this subsection 3 The owner shall agree to pay a proportionate share of all costs associated with the construction of the road and traffic system improvements as determined by the City Further, where the subject property abuts and takes access off of a City street, the owner agrees to improve the property's frontage to City standards as outlined in the City's construction standards The owner shall submit plans of the frontage improvements to the City for review and approval along with providing mylar reproducible or other acceptable as-built construction drawings upon completion The City shall have the right to inspect the construction work during and after completion 5 Ch. 7.11 KCC- Utility Service Outside the City of Kent Any work found not to have been constructed in accordance with the City's construction standards, as determined by the City's public works director or his or her designee, shall be corrected by owner at owner's expense These frontage improvements must be completed or bonded to the satisfaction of the City prior to the City providing utility service to the property 4 The owner agrees that the covenants and promises contained in these agreements shall run with the land and shall be binding upon all parties and successors in interest having or acquiring any right, title, or interest in the property and improvements described in any agreement 5 The owner agrees that, should it fail to comply w ith any of the covenants or any of the agreements executed with the City, the City may, at its sole discretion, terminate the utility services provided to owner 6 For those properties seeking City utility service that would affect an upstream tributary of a drainage watershed area that is subject, all or in part, to City regulation or control, and which is serviced, all or in part, by the City's storm and surface water utility, the follow mg additional requirements will also apply (a) The owner will design and constrict all public and/or private storm water detention and water quality treatment system(s) ("drainage system(s)") in a manner that meets or exceeds City construction standards as determined by the public works department The City's public works director, or his or her designee, reserves his or her right to withhold sanitary sewer and water service until the drainage system(s) have been constructed in accordance with these standards (b) The owner "ill submit all construction plans for the drainage system(s) associated with the development to the City for its review and approval prior to initiating development work on the properiv The owner will provide the City with mylar-reproducible or other acceptable as-built construction drawings of the drainage 6 Ch. 7.11 KCC- Utility Service Outside the City of Kent systein(s) after they have been constructed The owner will grant the City the right to enter the owner's property at any time in order to inspect any construction work during design or construction, or after its completion Any work found not to have been constructed in accordance with City construction standards, as determined by the public works director or his or her designee, shall be corrected by the owner at its sole cost and expense (c) The owner will pay any permit review fees deemed appropriate by the public works director The owner must grant to the City a right of access to inspect continuing operations and maintenance of the drainage system(s) to assure they are being operated and maintained properly. If the drainage system(s) are not maintained or operated properly, the owner agrees to promptly bring the utility facilities into compliance with City standards (d) Where deemed appropriate by the public works director, or his or her designee, owner's property may be subject to the same terms and conditions as those properties located within City limits, including but not limited to service charges in accordance with Ch 7 05 of the Kent City Code, as currently enacted or as hereafter amended or recodified from time to time SECTION 2. —Severafirhty If any one or more section, subsections, or sentences of this ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect SECTION 3. — Effective Date This ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days from and after its passage as provided by law JIM WHITE, MAYOR 7 Ch. 7.11 KCC- Utility Service Outside the City of Kent Is ATTEST BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM f TOM BRUBAKER, CITY ATTORNEY PASSED day of December, 2003 .APPROVED day of December, 2003 PUBLISHED day of December, 2003 I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No passed by the City council of the City of Kent, Washington, and approved by the mayor of the City of Kent as hereon indicated (SEAL) BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK 8 Ch. 7.11 KCC- Utility Service Outside the City of Kent Chapter 35.67.310 RCW - The Washington State Legislature Page 1 of 1 Legislature Home About E-Mail Lists Search Help RCW TITLES»TITLE 35>> CHAPTER 35 67>>SECTION 35 67 310 Pnnt Verson 35 67 300 << 35 67 310 >> 35 67 331 RCW 35.67.390 Sewers—Outside city connections. Every city or town may permit connections with any of its sewers, either directly or indirectly,from property beyond its limits, upon such terms, conditions and payments as may be prescribed by ordinance, which may be required by the city or town to be evidenced by a written agreement between the city or town and the owner of the property to be served by the connecting sewer If any such agreement is made and filed with the county auditor of the county in which said property is located, it shall constitute a covenant running with the land and the agreements and covenants therein shall be binding on the owner and all persons subsequently acquiring any right, title or interest in or to said property. If the terms and conditions of the ordinance or of the agreement are not kept and performed, or the payments made, as required, the city or town may disconnect the sewer and for that purpose may at any time enter upon any public street or road or upon said property [1965 c 7§3567 310 Pnor 1941 c 75§1,Rem Supp 1941§9354-19 1 http://www.leg.wa.gov/RCW/index.cfm?fuseaction=section&section=35.67.310 11/25/2003 !\ Kent City Council Meeting • A J Date December 9, 2003 " Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: MATRICULA CONSULAR IDENTIFICATION RESOLUTION — ADOPT 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Adopt Resolution No. ���''�" acknowledging and recognizing the Mexican Consular Identification Card as a valid form of identification for City services and recommending that private agencies and institutions within the City also accept the card when doing so will not conflict with state or federal law. 3. EXHIBITS: Resolution and 12/1/03 memorandum to the Public Safety Committee • 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Safety Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES_ 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: S SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: p • ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 6Y LAW DEPARTMENT Tom Brubaker, City Attorney Phone 253-856-5770 Fax 253-856-6770 K EN T Address 220 Fourth Avenue S WASHINGTON Kent,WA 98032-5895 DATE: December 1, 2003 TO: Public Safety Committee I {II FROM: Tammy Larson-White, Paralega 1'(` � THROUGH. Mike Martin, Chief Administrati e fficer Tom Brubaker, City Attorney SUBJECT: Mexican Matncula Consular Recognition and Recommendation - Resolution MOTION: Recommend Council adopt the proposed Resolution acknowledging and recognizing the Mexican Consular Identification Card as a valid form of identification for City services and recommending that private agencies and institutions within the City also accept the card when doing so will not conflict with state or federal law. SUMMARY: There are Mexican nationals residing in the Kent area that do not possess a form of identification acknowledged by local public and private institutions Many immigrants lack access to certain services from public and private agencies and institutions because they do not possess a recognized form of identification. In a number of cities across the nation, Mexican Consulates and Consulate Generals have begun to issue identification cards to Mexican nationals who have an official birth certificate, a proper form of Mexican identification, and who have been residing in the United States for at least six (6) months This identification card is known as a Matrcula Consular The Matricula Consular has been accepted by 74 United States banks, including four of the largest banks in Washington State—US Bank, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Washington Mutual In addition, more than 800 police departments and 80 cities, including Seattle, Renton, Bellevue, Yakima, and Tacoma, have acknowledged the Matrcula Consular as a valid form of identification Each Washington city that has passed a resolution recognizing and accepting the Matncula Consular, has reported only positive results Renton's police department wholeheartedly supported acceptance and recognition of the card Its police officers felt that any identification presented was better than no identification Bellevue's police department also supported acceptance of the card as it felt that if a Mexican national knew the card was a recognized mode of identification, he or she would be more apt to present it and to report a crime In addition, Bellevue felt that the biggest benefit derived by passage of its resolution is that the resolution helped to build a bond between Bellevue and its Mexican community Yakima had similar results as Renton and Bellevue. It too felt that passage of its resolution helped Yakima to build upon its relationship with its minority community, especially with its Mexican community Seattle's and Tacoma's results since passage of their resolutions mirrors those of Renton, Bellevue, and Tacoma No city acknowledged experiencing any negative consequences since passing their respective resolutions MEMORANDUM Public Safety Committee December 1, 2003 Page: 2 If Kent were to pass the proposed resolution, it will allow City staff to acknowledge and accept the Matricula Consular as a valid form of identification when the card is presented for identification purposes, if to do so would not be contrary to federal or state law. The resolution allows the card to be presented for identification purposes only. The card does not establish, nor does the proposed resolution purport to establish, an individual's immigration status The Matricula Consular does not confer any rights upon the card holder that are afforded only to those lawfully residing within the United States As an example, the card cannot be presented for employment purposes as such acceptance is prohibited by federal law. In addition, the card cannot be accepted for identification purposes in the purchase of alcohol or tobacco products as it is not listed within the Revised Code of Washington (RCW 66 16 040) or the Washington Administrative Code (WAC 314-10-050) as a valid form of identification for these purposes. Recognition and acceptance of the Matricula Consular will, however, allow Mexican nationals access to City services that are currently afforded to all residents within the City of Kent, regardless of their immigration status. Passage of the proposed resolution will assist our police officers in their interactions with Mexican nationals If the card were to be recognized and accepted In Kent, that act could improve the exchanges and limit the fear among Mexican nationals reporting a crime or providing assistance to police It may also allow women within Kent's Mexican community to feel as though they can contact the police for assistance in reporting domestic violence Many crimes may go unreported due to an immigrant's fear that she or he lacks proper identification to present to the responding police officers However, if the City were to pass the proposed resolution, it would let the Mexican nationals in our City know that they can present the Matricula Consular to police officers if identification is requested. Recognition of the Matricula Consular is another way to improve the quality of services provided by the City to its residents Another way acceptance of the card will increase access to City services is that the City's Human Services Office will be able to accept the Matricula Consular as photo identification when requested in exchange for needed assistance. Human Services has a housing program wherein it provides assistance, through funding to Catholic Community Services, to homeless women and children This assistance is provided in the form of motel vouchers In cold weather, motel vouchers are offered to homeless women and children. In order to receive a motel voucher, the receiver must possess photo identification In addition, in order to tender the motel voucher, the motel also requires that photo identification be provided By acceptance and recognition of the Matricula Consular, additional women and children will be able to access these services This resolution originally passed through the Operations Committee on September 16, 2003, and was set on the City Council's October 7, 2003 agenda The resolution was pulled from the agenda and Councilmember Peterson moved to send the matter to the Public Safety Committee for further study regarding the potential impacts of the City recognizing the card BUDGET IMPACT: None PIG CTIpK LVESMEETS� mwiw PupSS,SMn px • RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, acknowledging and recognizing the Mexican Consular Identification Card, or Matncula Consular, as a valid form of identification for City services, and recommending that private agencies and institutions conducting business within the City also acknowledge and recognize the Maticula Consular as a valid form of identification, when doing so N%ill not conflict with state or federal law WHEREAS, there are many Mexican nationals residing in the Kent area • who do not possess a form of identification acknowledged by local police and private institutions, and WHEREAS, many immigrants lack access to certain services from public and private agencies and institutions because they do not possess identification, and WHEREAS, in a number of cities across the nation, Mexican Consulates and Consulate Generals have begun to issue identification cards to Mexican nationals who have an official birth certificate, a proper form of Mexican identification, and Aho have been residing in the United States for at least six months; and WHEREAS, use of the Mexican Consular identification cards will enable more residents of Kent to use public services, and WHEREAS, the Mexican Consular ID card, or Matncula Consular, has been accepted by 74 United States banks, including four of the largest banks in 1 Mexican Matncula Consular- Recognition and Recommendation Washington State—US Bank, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Washington Mutual; and WHEREAS, throughout the United States, more than 800 police departments, 80 cities (including Seattle, Bellevue, Renton, Yakima, Tacoma, San Francisco, Los Angeles, and San Antonio), and 13 states (including Washington, Oregon, and Idaho), have acknowledged the Matricula Consular as a valid form of identification, NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. — Cal, Recozintion. The Mexican Consular Identification Card, or Matncula Consular, may be acknowledged, recognized, and accepted by staff in City departments and agencies as a valid form of identification when presented by an individual seeking City services. SECTION 2. — Prnate Agency Reconnnendation. The City Council recommends that private agencies and institutions conducting business within the City of Kent also acknow ledge, recognize, and accept the Mexican Consular Identification Card, or Matricula Consular, as a valid form of identification. SECTION 3. — Exception. The Mexican Consular ID card, or Matricula Consular, shall not be used as a valid form of identification if to do so would be contrary to federal, state, or local laws. For example, and not by way of limitation, the Matricula Consular card is not suitable for identification purposes in the purchase of alcohol or tobacco products as it is not listed within RCW 66.16 040 and WAC 314-10-050 as a valid form of identification. SECTION 4. - Severabdity. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase of this resolution is declared unconstitutional or invalid for 2 Mexican Matricula Consular- Recognition and Recommendation any reason, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this resolution SECTION 5. - Effective Date. This resolution shall take effect and be in force immediately upon its passage. PASSED at a regular open public meeting by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, this day of December, 2003 CONCURRED in by the Mayor of the City of Kent this day of December, 2003 JIM WHITE, MAYOR ATTEST: BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM• TOM BRUBAKER, CITY ATTORNEY I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of Resolution No passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, the day of December, 2003. BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK P`G.d%Rcsolwion�M a,na )XowWw-Recogmnwn doc 3 Mexican Matricula Consular- Recognition and Recommendation . Kent City Council Meeting Date December 9, 2003 Category Bids 1. SUBJECT: UPPER MERIDIAN CREEK BOX CULVERT SUPPLY CONTRACT 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: The bid opening for this project was held on November 25 with three bids received. The low bid was submitted by Granite Precasting & Concrete in the amount of$122,851.18. The Engineer's estimate was $125,115.65. The Public Works Director recommends awarding this contract to Granite Precasting & Concrete. 3. EXHIBITS: Bid tab 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Director (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES_ 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $122,851.18 SOURCE OF FUNDS: D0043 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 8A PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Don E Wickstrom, P E Public Works Director Phone 253-856-5500 Fax 253-856-6500 K EN T Address 220 Fourth Avenue S W A S H I N G T J N — - — Kent,WA 98032-5895 DATE: December 9, 2003 TO: Mayor White and Kent City Council FROM: Don Wickstrom, Public Works Director SUBJECT: Upper Meridian Valley Creek Box Culverts Supply SUMMARY: Bid opening for this project was held on November 25, 2003 with three bids received The lowest bid was submitted by Granite Precasting & Concrete in the amount of $122,851 18 The Engineer's estimate was 5125,115 65 The Public Works Director recommends awarding this contract to Granite Precasting & Concrete Bid Summary Granite Precasting& Concrete S 122,851 18 Utility Vault $137,272 96 Hanson Pipe& Products, Inc $154,169 60 Engineer's Estimate $125,115 65 BUDGET IMPACT No Unbudgeted Fiscal/Personnel Impact MOTION Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds that the Upper Meridian Valley Creek Box Culverts Supply contract be awarded to Granite Precasting & Concrete for the low bid amount of S 122,851 18 Mayor White and Kent City Council tipper Meridian Vallev Creek Box Culverts Supply-Award Bid December 9,2003 I • REPORTS FROM STANDING COMMITTEES AND STAFF A. COUNCIL PRESIDENT B. OPERATIONS COMMITTEE C. PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE D. PUBLIC WORKS E. PLANNING COMMITTEE F. PARKS COMMITTEE G. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS REPORTS FROM SPECIAL COMMITTEES t Operations Committee Minutes November 18, 2003 Committee Members Present Chair Rico Yingling, Leona Orr, Judy Woods sitting in for Tim Clark The meeting was called to order by Rico Yingling, Chair at 4 08 P M. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 4, 2003 Leona Orr moved to approve the minutes of the November 4, 2003, Operations Committee meeting. The motion was seconded by Judy Woods and passed 3-0. APPROVAL OF VOUCHERS DATED NOVEMBER 14, 2003 Judy Woods moved to approve the vouchers dated November 14, 2003. Leona Orr seconded the motion, which passed 3-0. STREAMLINED SALES TAX RESOLUTION Chief Administrative Officer Mike Martin presented the Streamlined Sales Tax Resolution and • provided a revised Resolution The resolution creates the opportunity for the Kent City Council to formally affirm the City's position on Washington State implementation of the Streamlined Sales Tax project The resolution supports efforts to streamline tax collection definitions and procedures However, the resolution requests that sales tax revenue from intrastate sales continue to be distributed at the point of sale, rather than at the point of delivery Such an approach protects cities that have used this sales tax revenue to construct and operate infrastructure to support businesses that generate these intrastate sales Yet, catalog and mternet sales conducted by out of state companies would generate sales taxes distributed to the point of delivery - specifically to cities whose residents and businesses placed the order, ensuring all cities across the state will benefit from the streamlined sales tax provisions overall The resolution also directs that implementation of sales tax streamlining provision should coincide with federal adoption of similar provisions allowing collection of sales taxes on mternet and catalog sales across state lines. Implementing changes to the state's sales tax structure before federal action authorizes sales tax collection on internet and catalog sales is premature Such action would only cause intrastate sales tax distribution dislocation with nominal fiscal benefit to the state as a whole There will be no budget impact at the time of the adoption of the resolution, however, implementation of Sales Tax Streamlining provisions that shift sales tax distribution for intrastate sales from point of sale to point of delivery would cost the City of Kent approximately $4 million annually Leona Orr moves to recommend that the Streamlined Sales Tax Resolution, as presented in its amended form, be placed on the consent calendar for the December 9, 2003, Council meeting for adoption. The motion was seconded by Judy Woods and passed 3-0. 2 Operations Committee, 11/18/2003 ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE WRITE-OFFS Finance Director May Miller presented the Accounts Receivable Write-Offs. The Washington State auditor's office recommends that the City write-off uncollectible accounts that are over one year old This year the write-off request is for $9,252.51 for accounts from 1992 through 2002 of miscellaneous Accounts Receivable, Utility Billing receivables and customer accounts There is no budget impact and it is considered within Bad Debt Accrual Amount Ms Miller stated that this is the lowest write-offs in five (5)years Judy Woods moved to recommend authorization of miscellaneous Accounts Receivable, Utility Billing, and customer write-offs of $9,252.51 for accounts from 1992 through 2002, and to forward this Account Receivable Write-Offs on to Council on December 9, 2003, for authorization. The motion was seconded by Leona Orr and passed 3-0. 2003 LTGO COUNCILMANIC BONDS Finance Director May Miller presented the 2003 LTGO Councilmanic Bonds The 2003 LTGO Councilmanic Bond issue totals approximately $7,518,000 and contains three items A Taxable Bonds for $1,874,000 B Tax Exempt Bonds for$3,529,000 C Refunding 1992 Bonds for $2,115,000 Debt service on A and B will be included in the 2004 budget. Savings on C will be included in 2004 through 2007 budgets. A TAXABLE BONDS The taxable LTGO bonds total approximately$1,874,000 and include$1,200,000 for loan repayment to the Water Fund for land purchase for the Kent Station protect. The $1,200,000 is the final payment of the original $3,900,000 Water Fund loan to the Kent Station protect and is due 1/1412004. A second Water Fund loan remains outstanding with a 2006 due date Approximately $655,000 of bond proceeds will refinance the capital improvement loan on the downtown Saturday Market building currently payable to U. S. Bank at 7 125% interest rate. The refinance rate of estimated 5 45% will provide long-term financing for the protect and approximately $39,000 of net present value savings. The taxable bonds carry a 15 year term at an approximate 5 45% interest rate and can be called at any time without penalty as long as future interest rates are no higher than today If rates are lower, there would be a make-whole prepayment fee. B. TAX EXEMPT BONDS The $3,529,000 tax exempt bonds will fund the second issuance of bonds for the city's Tech 11 plan The plan's intent to bond was approved by Council on 5/21/2002 The technology bonds primarily fund public safety systems for the tail and records management systems as well as providing officer reporting, crime analysis, mug shot tools, and other technology protects The tax exempt bonds also include some funds for technology servers, security upgrades, and productivity software. The planned bond amount was reduced from $4,000,000 to $3,500,000 due to cost savings The tax 2 3 Operations Committee, 11/18/2003 exempt technology bonds will be for ten years at approximately 3 55% interest Ms. Miller stated that tax exempt bonds need to go towards public use projects and that is why there is the need for the Taxable Bonds and Tax Exempt Bonds. C. REFUNDING 1992 BONDS The 1992 LTGO Refunding Bonds of approximately $2,115,000 will provide net savings of approximately $127,000. This will be achieved by refinancing callable bonds maturing in 2004-2007. The refinancing rate of approximately 2 3% will show significant savings over the current 6 351%- 6 5% interest with approximately$117,000 of the savings in 2004 The bonds were originally issued to refund portions of 1985, 1986, and 1987 bond issues and were used for Golf Open Space, Corrections Facility, Senior Center, Library and Street capital projects The exact amounts and interest rates will be set after Council Committee approval and stated in the final Ordinance at the December 9, 2003, regular Council Meeting Bond closing is expected on December 18, 2003. Leona Orr moved to recommend the 2003 (LTGO) Councilmanic Bond Ordinance for approximately $7,518,000, including issuance costs, be placed on the consent calendar for the December 9, 2003, City Council meeting for adoption. The motion was seconded by Judy Woods and passed 3-0. The meeting was adjourned at 4 32 P M Renee Cameron Operations Committee Secretary 3 CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS A. • EXECUTIVE SESSION A) Labor Negotiations ACTION AFTER EXECUTIVE SESSION A) •