Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
City Council Meeting - Council - Agenda - 09/16/2003
OEM City of Kent City Council Meeting Agenda September 16, 2003 Mayor Jim White Councilmembers Judy Woods, Council President Tim Clark Julie Peterson Connie Epperly Bruce White Leona Orr Rico Yingling KEN T WASHINGTON City Clerk's Office SUMMARY AGENDA KENT KENT CITY COUNCIL MEETING W A 5 H I N O T O N September 16, 2003 Council Chambers 7:00 p.m. MAYOR: Jim White COUNCILMEMBERS: Judy Woods, President Tim Clark Connie Epperly Leona Orr Julie Peterson Bruce White Rico Yingling 1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE °`'/(�✓" 2. ROLL CALL 3. CHANGES TO AGENDA A. FROM COUNCIL,ADMINISTRATION, OR STAFF B. FROM THE PUBLIC 4. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS A. Economic Development Update B. Proclamation—Mayor's Day of Concern for the Hungry C. Proclamation—Constitution Week D. Proclamation—Grandview Park Off Leash Area E. Proclamation—Cannon Baseball Club Recognition Day F ')ruba,kel-!' f 11 tro d u.c+-+00 s 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. LID 357—Formation— 120th Place SE Saru ewers B. Six-Year Transportation Improvement Plan Re olution C. 2004 Annual Budget(First Hearing) D. Capital Improvement Plan 2004-2009 (First Hearing) E. Comprehensive Plan/Capital Facilities Element Amendment 6. C NSE T CALE AR A. Minutes of Previous Meeting—Approve B. Payment of Bills—Approve C. Local Agency Agreement with Washington State Department of Transportation for S. 228th Street Railroad Grade Separations Project—Authorize d D. Intelligent Transportation Systems Deployment Grant—Accept A►y% -n eQd�,7 4 E. Washington Traffic Safe Commission Grant—Accept - G` F. Exa ed 7. OTHER BUSINESS None 8. BIDS None 9. REPORTS FROM STANDING COMMITTEES AND STAFF (continued next page) • SUMMARY AGENDA CONTINUED 10. REPORTS FROM SPECIAL COMMITTEES A . a rst 11. CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS /7 12. EXECUTIVE SESSION A. Pending Litigation B. Property Acquisition 13. ACTION AFTER EXECUTIVE SESSION 14. ADJOURNMENT • NOTE: A copy of the full agenda packet is available for perusal in the City Clerk's Office and the Kent Library. The Agenda Summary page is on the City of Kent web site at www.ci.kent.wa.us. • An explanation of the agenda format is given on the back of this page. Any person requiring a disability accommodation should contact the City Clerk's Office in advance at (253) 856-5725. For TDD relay service call the Washington Telecommunications Relay Service at 1-800-833-6388. • CHANGES TO THE AGENDA Citizens wishing to address the Council will, at this time, make known the subject of interest, so all may be properly heard. A) FROM COUNCIL, ADMINISTRATION, OR STAFF B) FROM THE PUBLIC • a • PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS A) ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT UPDATE B) PROCLAMATION-MAYOR'S DAY OF CONCERN FOR THE HUNGRY C) PROCLAMATION- CONSTITUTION WEEK D) PROCLAMATION-GRANDVIEW PARK OFF LEASH AREA E) PROCLAMATION-CANNON BASEBALL CLUB RECOGNITION DAY • • Kent City Council Meeting Date September 16, 2003 Category Public Hearings 1. SUBJECT: LID 357—FORMATION— 120TH PLACE SE SANITARY SEWERS 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: This date has been set for the public hearing on the formation of LID 357. The Public Works Director will make a presentation. 3. EXHIBITS: Public Works Director memorandum 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Council 8/19/2003 (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) • 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: ��J A. Councilmember moves, Councilmember" seconds to close the public hearing. _,✓ B. Councilmember L"=moves, Councilmember Wseconds; to approve the formation of LID 357 for the construction of 120th Sanitary Sewers project, including related improvements, and to direct the City Attorney to draft the necessary ordinance. DISCUSSION: • ACTION: C Council Agenda Item No. 5A PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 4^4 Don E. Wickstrom, P E. Public Works Director Phone 253-856-5500 Fax, 253-856-6500 K E N T WASH IN G T o N Address. 220 Fourth Avenue S Kent,WA 98032-5895 DATE: September 16,2003 TO: Ma ite and Kent City Council FROM: Do ickstrom, Public Works Director SUBJECT: L.I.D. 357: 1201h PI. SE Sanitary Servers (SE 2561h Street to 200 feet south) L.I.D. Formation Public Hearing September 16, 2003 has been scheduled for the formation public hearing for the above referenced L I D. project SUMMARY: The City received a petition for the installation of sanitary sewers in the vicinity of SE 2561h Street and 120th Pl. SE as shown on the attached map. Subsequently, all property owners within the project area were contacted and there appears to be adequate support to proceed with the L.I D. formation The project area is inside of the City limits and Kent's sewer service area. The City developed a proposal to service the six lots on the 120th Pl SE cul de sac. Sewer is available to all other properties in the vicinity. The information including cost was given to the petitioner. The petitioner contacted his neighbors and confirmed interest in the L.I.D. with new signatures on a new petition. Four of the six lots (67%) signed the petition. These parcels are indicated on the attached map. The other two property owners do not want to proceed with the L.I.D. due to the expense. The proposal was reviewed by the Public Works Committee on August 4, 2003 and the Resolution of Intent was passed by City Council on August 19, 2003 setting the hearing date for September 16, 2003. BUDGET IMPACT: No Unbudgeted Fiscal/Personnel Impact BACKGROUND: Proposed Sanitary Sewer Improvements The proposed project is the construction of an 8" sanitary sewer system with 6" side sewer stubs to the right-of-way line for each of the 6 properties included in the L.I.D boundary. The construction will include 8" sewer at the following locations: ON FROM TO 120TI Pl SE SE 2561h Street approximately 200 feet south Mayor White and Kent City Council I LID 357 120`s Place SE Sanitary Sewers September 16,2003 Need For Sewer The project area is an older residential area developed with septic systems. All six lots have homes. It is not known how many existing septic systems are technically in a state of failure, however, we understand from the residence that there have been septic problems in the area. Our understanding is that there are no serious septic problems at this time. Due to the age of the septic systems and the potential for problems, the petitioners are wanting to upgrade to sanitary sewer. Usually it is difficult to repair septic problems, especially on small lots such as these with limited space. Sanitary sewers are usually the most feasible, economical and long term method for addressing these potential problems, especially when numerous property owners in a neighborhood support sewer installation as is the case with this proposal. The Department of Public health has told us that the life expectancy of a septic system is twenty to thirty years depending on use and maintenance and that they are a short term disposal method until public sewers become available. The project area has exceeded this time frame, therefore, these systems are at or are near the end of their useful live. They also say that the cost of septic repairs may be as high as converting to public sewers. The latest state codes make septic repairs more difficult and expensive than in the past. The soil type within the project area is poorly rated for septic system use. According to the Soil Conservation Service (US Dept. of Agriculture) soil survey for King County, the soil type as mapped is rated severe limitation for septic drain fields. The soil series is designated as AgB (Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 0 to 6% slopes). This soil exhibits very slow permeability below a depth of 24-40 inches and a seasonal high water table. Effluent and drainage move laterally over the imperious layers. Effluent may come to the surface. In addition to the need for sewers in this area to replace the old septic systems, there are environmental concerns. The project area is located near two mapped wetlands located along the northwest tributary to the west fork of Soosette Creek. Septic systems are a threat to water quality. Proiect Funding L.I.D. $90,000 CITY 11,700 TOTAL $101,700 The total L.I.D. assessment is estimated at $90,000. All lots are single family lots receiving one side sewer connection so all are assessed equally. The estimated assessment is $15,000 per lot. There are no City owned properties within the proposed project However, the proposal is for the City to contribute an estimated $11,700 sewer utility funds. Typical sewer L I.D projects are estimated at about $15,000 per lot. Due to the small size of this project, the per lot cost is higher. The proposal is for the City to fund the cost in excess of the $15,000 per lot assessment. Mayor White and Kent City Council 2 LID 357. 12&Place SE Sanitary Sewers September 16,2003 Method of Assessment All lots are single family lots receiving one side sewer connection so all are assessed equally. Payment of Assessment Upon Council passing the Ordinance confirming the Final Assessment Roll, there is a 30-day period in which any portion or all of the assessment can be paid without interest charges. After the 30-day period, the balance is paid over a ten-year period wherein each year's payment is one- tenth of the principal plus interest on the unpaid balance. The market determines the interest rate at the time the L.I.D. bonds are sold to the public. Support For L.I.D. 357 To defeat an L.I.D. proposal, there must be protest from property owners representing 60% or more of the proposed L.I.D. assessments. The total project cost for calculating protest percentage is $90,000. The 60% protest amount is $54,000. As indicated previously, there appears to be substantial property owner support for the project with 67% expressing interest. Should this level of support continue through the public hearing process, it will then be a City Council decision whether or not to proceed with the L.I.D. formation and approve the L.I.D. formation ordinance. Mandatory Sewer Connection The City code states that all residences located within 200 feet of a City of Kent sanitary sewer shall be required to connect to the sewer and shall be billed for the service. The Code provides that compliance with this provision be within 90 days after the date of official notice. In the case of a public health or safety hazard, compliance shall be within 20 days of official notification. Following construction of the project, should the L.I.D. be formed, the City will send each property owner an official notice that the sanitary sewer service is available to the parcel and is within 200 feet of the house. Following the compliance period, all properties that have not yet applied for a sided sewer permit will be subject to paying the City's monthly sewer service charges as the penalty for not connecting. Water Main Construction For sometime the water main on 1201h Pl SE has been in need of replacement. The proposal is for the City to fund and construct the necessary water main improvements in conjunction with the sanitary sewer should the L.I.D. be formed. The road restoration costs will be shared between the water and sewer projects, thereby reducing the sewer construction costs Attachments Mayor White and Kent City Council 3 LID 357. 1200'Place SE Sanitary Sewers September 16,2003 E. 116 ST. Q s 218TH 1 �n 7 SE 223RD ST CITY OF KENT Z " I m l S 228 / o / r to m II n r N 'r, i s 5T SE 40 T ; SE 2 w < N I sE 4a ST CI ARK lK O� Z rn SE aBTH ST W a = W H 5 2N 5T o PR JECT W L 'T ON z _ n WA t s s6TH s w uj 9TH STp kfM1'I / / SE 264TH ST / W W N 7 m 8 Ri i SR 6 o �R / a / M1 / f 77 sT Q{ 3 Y CITY OF KENT ENGINEERINO DEPARTMENT 400 W, GOWE 5T KENT, WA. 9E032 PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER L.I.D. VICINITY MAP /� KENT 120TH PL S.E. (S.Eo 256TH STREET TO 200 FT. SOUTH) u U � EXISTING SANITARY SEWER WETLAND S.E. 256TH ST W y LEGEND O1 * 6O WET LA ND ASSESSMENT , \ lJ NUMBER d PROPOSED O F s 8" SANITARY � LID PARCEL • "' p 1 ' • SEWER -—-PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER BOUNDARY SIGNED NEW PETITION KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION OFFICES 0 0 0 Q R CITY Of KENT ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 400 W. GOWE ST KENT. WA. 901032 PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER L.I.D. BOUNDARY MAP W _ OT 120TH PL S.E. """""' (S.E. 256TH STREET TO 200 FT. SOUTH) o DULY. 2003 Yl W 9 u Kent City Council Meeting Date September 16, 2003 Category Public Hearings 1. SUBJECT: SIX-YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PLAN— RESOLUTION 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Each year the City is required to update the Six-Year Transportation Improvement Plan. This plan updates last year's plan. September 16, 2003, was set as the public hearing date for adoption of the plan. If this Resolution is passed at the conclusion of the public hearing, the Resolution would approve the 2004-2009 Six-Year Transportation Improvement Plan. 3. EXHIBITS: Resolution; 2004-2009 Six Year Transportation Plan, which is attached as Exhibit "A" to the Resolution and Public Works Director's memorandum i • 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: A. Councilmember moves, Councilmember ILVISeconds to close the public hearing. /ft B. Councilmember JAmoves, Councilmember&seconds to adopt Resolution No. 15�4 approving the 2004-2009 Six-Year Transportation Improvement Plan. • DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 513 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Page 1 of 2 Jacober, Brenda From: Perschek,Janet Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 4.56 PM To: Jacober, Brenda Subject: PW Cmte Cover Letter doc L1 UBLIC WORKS DE�ARTMEI Don E. Wickstrom, P E. Public Works Direc Phone.253-856-51 Fa 253-856-6! Address* 220 Zurth Avenue A 98032-51 DATE: August 18, 2003 TO: Mayor White and Kent City Council FROM: Don Wickstrom, Public Works Director SUBJECT: Six-Year Transportation Improvement Plan, 2004-2009 MOTION: Recommend Council set a Public Hearing on September 16, 2003 for the adoption of the Six-Year Transportation Improvement Plan for the period 2004-2009. SUMMARY: The2004-2009 Six Year TIP includes 29 projects, with estimated project costs totaling $175,646,000 BUDGET IMPACT As itemized in attached Project Descriptions No Unbudgeted Fiscal/Personnel Impact BACKGROUND: Deleted from the 2003-2008 TIP COMPLETED OR IN-PROGRESS 132nd Ave SE Widening 248t" Street Improvements James Street at Central Intersection Improvement 132°d Ave SE at Kent Kangley Road Intersection Improvement South 277th Street Corridor, Phase 2 DELAYED FOR FUTURE FUNDING South 212t" Street Railroad Grade Separation Added to 2004-2009 TIP Second Ave North and West Smith Street Intersection Improvement Central Avenue North and Pioneer Street Intersection Improvement Central Avenue and Burlington Northern Railroad Crossings Intertie (5 intersections) Changed 9/11/2003 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Page 2 of 2 S 228th Railroad Grade Separation split into two distinct projects. One for each RR. Willis Street Railroad Grade Separation split into two distinct projects. One for each RR. S 277th Street Corridor Extension was previously called the 116th Ave SE Street Widening Project. 9/11/2003 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, adopting the 2004-2009 Six Year Transportation Improvement Plan. WHEREAS, after proper notice,the City Council of the City of Kent held a public hearing at the regular meeting of the City Council at 7.00 p.m on September 16, 2003, to consider public testimony on the city's proposed 2004-2009 Six Year Transportation Improvement Plan and, having considered public testimony to the plan, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT,WASHINGTON,DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The 2004 through 2009 Six Year Transportation Improvement Plan,set forth in Exhibit"A"attached hereto and herewith filed with the city clerk, is hereby adopted. 1 2004-2009 Sir Year Transportation Improvement Plan PASSED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Kent,Washington this day of September, 2003. CONCURRED in by the Mayor of the City of Kent,this day of September, 2003. JIM WHITE, MAYOR ATTEST: BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: TOM BRUBAKER, CITY ATTORNEY I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of Resolution No. passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, the day of September, 2003. (SEAL) BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK P 1CrvdhRnulwwn�SIXYEAR--2003 RES dm 2 2004-2009 Six Year Transportation Improvement Plan 67 • CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON SIX-YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2004 - 2009 • • KENT WASHINGTON Mayor Jim White Don E. Wickstrom, P.E. Director of Public Works 68 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Project Project Name Number Project Location and Extent Page 1 Pacific Highway South (SR 99) HOV Lanes—North Phase 1 South 252"`i Street to Kent-Des Moines Road(SR 516) 2 Pacific Highway South (SR 99) HOV Lanes—South Phase 2 South 272"d Street to South 252"d Street 3. Kent Station Infrastructure Improvements 3 Vicinity of 41h Avenue North and Ramsay Way 4 4'h Avenue North and West Smith Street 4 Intersection Improvement 5 Second Avenue North and West Smith Street 5 Intersection improvements 6. Central Avenue North and Pioneer Street 6 Intersection improvements and widening of Pioneer Street 7 Military Road South at Reith Road 7 Intersection Improvement S. South 228'h Street Corridor Project- Phase I 8 Military Road South to 54'h.9venue South 9 Central Avenue/Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad 9 Grade Crossings Signals Intertie Interconnection of intersection traffic signals along Central Avenue Wuh BNSFRR grade-crossing signals 10 South 220 Street Extension/Burlington Northern Santa Fe 10 Railroad Grade Separation Project Grade separation crossing at Burlington Northern Santa Fe RR 11. South 228'h Street Extension/Union Pacific Railroad Grade l f Separation Project Grade Separation Crossings at Union Pacific Railroad t 69 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Project Project Name Number Protect Locution and Extent Pape 12. Interurban Trail Crossings Signal Interconnect with West Aleeker 12 Street and West Smith Street Signal Systems 13 South 212'h Street Pavement Rehabilitation Project 13 Green River Bridge to West Valle),Highway(SR 181) 14 84t'Avenue South Pavement Rehabilitation Project 14 SR 167 to South 212`h Street 15. 72nd Avenue South Extension 15 South 2006 Street to South 19e Street 16. South 2771h Street Corridor Extension 16 1161h Ave Southeast Widening Kent-Kangley Road(SR 516)to . Southeast 256" Street 17. Central Avenue South Pavement Rehabilitation 17 Green River Bridge to East Wallis Street (SR 516) 18. Military Road South Widening- Phase I 18 Reuh Road to Kent-Des Moines Road(SR 516) 19 Willis Street (SR5]6)/Union Pacific Railroad Grade Separation 19 Project Grade Separation Crossing at Union Pacific Railroad 20 Willis Street (SR 516)/Burlington Northern Santa Fe 20 Railroad Grade Separation Project Grade Separation Crossing at Bun lington Northern/Santa Fe Railroad 21. 80th Avenue South Widening 21 South 1961h Street to South 188ih Street 22. South 272"d Street Widening- Phase I 22 ?6'h Avenue South to Military Road South 23 South 272"d Street Widening-Phase It 23 Pacific Highway South (SR 99) to 26`i'Avenue South it 70 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Project Project Name Number Project Location and Extent Page 24 South 272nd Street Widening- Phase III 24 Pacific Highway South to Military Road South and I-S HOV Loop-Ramp 25. South 228'"Street Corridor Project- Phase III 25 84'h Avenue South to 108'"Avenue Southeast(Benson Road) (SR 515) 26 Bicycle and Pedestrian improvements 26 Ongoing Citywide Program 27 Guardrail and Safety Improvements 27 Ongoing Citywide Program 28 Americans with Disabilities Act Compliance Sidewalk 28 Repair and Rehabilitation Ongoing Citywide Program 29 Commuter/Shopper Shuttle Bus Project 29 Ongoing Crtywrde Program 30 MAP OF THE PROJECTS 30 I I I I fit 71 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2004 PROJECT: Pacific Hi5h►ray South (SR 99)HOV Lanes—North Phase South 252 Street to Kent-Des Moines Road (SR 516) DESCRIPTION: Widen Pacific Highway South to provide a pair of HOV (High Occupancy Vehicle) lanes from South 252nd Street to the Kent-Des Moines Road (SR 516). The project will also provide a seven foot wide concrete sidewalk and modify existing traffic signal systems at South 240rh Street, and at South 252"d Street The project will include construction of full width paving, concrete curbs and gutters, landscaping; storm drainage,utilities; and appurtenances. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering . $1,200,000 Right of Way Acquisition $530,000 Construction $6,720,000 TOTAL........................................$89450,000 FUNDING SOURCE (S): STP, TB,TIA,City of Kent, WSDOT Funded PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This project will reduce peak hour single-occupant vehicle trips by encouraging high occupancy vehicle usage Pacific Highway South (SR 99) is a regionally significant north-south arterial heavily used by commuters for access from South King County to the employment centers in South Seattle, and provides alternative access to I-5 and Sea- Tac airport A1P-Artcnwl improvement Program[State],CM-4Q-Congestion Mnigauon and Au Quality[Fccicrrl),FAST-Freight Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FM.S1B-Freight Mobility Strategic investment Board[State],FTA-Federal Transit Administration[Federal),/!ES-Hazard Elimination[Federal),/TS-Intelligent Transportation Systems[Federal],LID- Local Improvement District,PWTF-Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State], STP-Surface Transportation Program[Federal], TIA-Transportation Improvement Account,TIB-Transportation Improvement Board[State],TPP—Transportation Partnership Program[State] 1 72 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2004 PROJECT: Pacific Highway South (SR 99) HOV Lanes—South Phase South 272 Street to South 252"d Street DESCRIPTION: Widen Pacific Highway South to provide a pair of HOV (High Occupancy Vehicle) lanes from South 272"d Street to South 252"d Street The project will also provide a seven foot wide concrete sidewalk, and modify existing traffic signals at the Fred Meyer Shopping Center, South 260th Street, and South 272"d Street. The project will include construction of full width paving, concrete curbs and gutters; landscaping; storm drainage; utilities; and appurtenances PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineenng . . $900,000 Right of Way Acquisition $1,600,000 Construction $6,100,000 TOTAL........................................$81600,000 FUNDING SOURCE (S): STP,TIB, AIP, TPP, City of Kent,WSDOT Funds Funded PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The project will reduce peak hour single-occupant vehicle trips by encouraging high occupancy vehicle usage Pacific Highway South (SR 99) is a regionally significant north-south arterial heavily used by commuters for access from South King County to the employment centers in South Seattle, and provides additional access to I-5 and Sea- Tac Airport AIP-Ancnal Improvement Program[State],CMAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FAST—Freight Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FMSIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Ini estmeni Board[State],FTA—Federal Transit Administration [Federal],11ES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems[Federal],LID— Local Improvement District,PWTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State],STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal], TIA—Transportation Improvement Account,TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[Slate],TPP—Transportation Partnership Program[State] 2 73 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2004 PROJECT: Kent Station Infrastructure Improvements Vicinity of 4`h Avenue North and Ramsay Way DESCRIPTION: Widen 2nd Avenue North to provide two travel lanes with left turn pockets at intersections, and on-street parking between West Smith Street and West Temperance Street. Construct the north half of West Temperance Street between 2"d Avenue North and Ist Avenue North Construct Ramsay Way from West Temperance Street to 4th Avenue North and install a traffic signal at 41h Avenue North and Ramsay Way. Widen 1 st Avenue North to three lanes from West Temperance Street to West James Street The project will include full width paving; concrete curbs, gutters, and sidewalks, landscaping; storm drainage; utilities, and appurtenances. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering $390,000 Right of Way Acquisition . . 0 Construction . . $1,930,000 TOTAL........................................S2,320,000 FUNDING SOURCE (S): CMAQ, City of Kent Funded PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This project provides the necessary transportation infrastructure for development of Kent Station and adjacent properties The project is coordinated with transit and commuter rail improvements in and around the vicinity of Kent Station and the Kent Transit Center sites The project includes street improvements required for the development of the site, as well as mitigation measures (traffic signal) to accommodate access to the City arterial street system AIP.Arterial improvement Program[state],CMAQ-Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Fcdcrel],PAST-Freight Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FMSIB-Frnght Mobibty Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA-federal Transit Administration[Federal],HGS-Hazard Ebrrunauon[Federal],ITS-Intclh¢cnt Transportation Systems[Federal],LID- Local Improvement District,PWTF-Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State],.STP-Surface Transportation Program[Federal], TIA-Transportation Improvement Account, TIB-Transportation Improvement Board[State],TPP—Transportation Partnership Program[State] 3 74 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2004 PROJECT: 41h Avenue North and West Smith Street Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvement DESCRIPTION: Reconstruct the 4th Avenue North and West Smith Street intersection by widening each approach to add a left turn pocket with appropriate left turn storage and upgrade the traffic signal. This project will include construction of full width paving; concrete curbs, gutters, and sidewalks; landscaping, storm drainage, utilities, and appurtenances PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering . . .. .... $185,000 Right of Way Acquisition .$140,000 Construction S635,000 TOTAL...........................................$9609000 FUNDING SOURCE(S): FTA, City of Kent,ITS Funded PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The intersection currently has four lanes on each approach Volumes are such that it is necessary to operate the signal to serve only one approach at a time This project widens each approach to provide for a separate left turn pocket with appropriate storage This allows a much more efficient operation of the signal at this intersection, and significantly enhances the traffic signal progression along both of these heavily traveled arterial corridors This project also improves traffic operations and provides arterial capacity for urban revitalization and serves as a key transit comdor. A1P-Anenal Improvement Program[State),CMAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal),!'AST—Freight Action Strategy for Everen-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FM.SIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Imesiment Board[State],FTA—Federal Transit Administration[Federal),11ES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],1TS—Intelligent Transportation Systems[Federal],LID— � Local Improvement District,PMTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[Stale],STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federall, TIA—Transportation Improvement Account,TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[Stale], TPP—Transportation Partnership Program[Stale] 4 75 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2004 PROJECT: Second Avenue North and West Smith Street DESCRIPTION: Minor widening on West Smith Street to provide separate left turn lanes, traffic signalization, traffic signal interconnect, and an interne to the Burlington Northern/Santa Fe Railroad grade crossing signal PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering. $200,000 Right of Way Acquisition $0 Construction $800,000 TOTAL....................... ...51,000,000 FUNDING SOURCE (S): City of Kent, ITS PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The signal provides access to/from the Kent Transit Station which includes the bus center plus connections to each of the commuter rail platforms and the downtown Park & Ride parking structure This intersection also provides the principal pedestrian connection between the historic downtown area, the Kent Transit Station, and the planned Transit Oriented Development(TOD) referred to as Kent Station AIP-Arterial improvement Program[State],CAIAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Aa Quality[Federal],FAST—Freight Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Comoor,FM.FIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[Stale),FTA—Federal Transit Administration[Fcdcrall.RES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],1TS—Intelligent Transportaiion Systems[Federal],LID— Local Improvement District,PWTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State],STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal), T1A—Transportation Improvement Account,T1B—Transportation Improvement Board[State],TPP—Transportation Partnership Program[State] 5 76 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2004 PROJECT: Central Avenue North/Pioneer Street Intersection improvement and widening of Pioneer Street DESCRIPTION: Widening of Central Avenue North and Pioneer Street intersection, widening of Pioneer Street, and traffic signal improvements PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering $100,000 Right of Way Acquisition . . $0 Construction . $336,000 TOTAL...........................................S4369000 FUNDING SOURCE (S): City of Kent,ITS PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Improvements to the comer radii and widening of Pioneer Street will enhance t ransit access t o the K ent T ransit C enter. The s ignal u pgrade includes traffic signal interconnect to the traffic signal system. This project is crucial to providing adequate access for the regional transit services to maneuver their buses into the Kent Transit Center and circulate through the Transit Center with minimal conflict from pedestrian or vehicle traffic AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[Statcl,CMAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],PAST—Freight Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FMS1B—Freight Mobibty Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA—Federal Transit Aditummauon[Federal],IIES— Hazard Elimmation[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems[Fcdcrai],LID— Local Improvement District,PWTF—Public works Trust Fund Loan[State],STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal], TIA—Transportation Improvement Account,TIB—Transportation improvement Board[State], TPP—Transportation Partnership Program[State] 6 77 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2004 PROJECT: Military Road South at Reith Road Intersection Improvement DESCRIPTION: Widen all approaches of Military Road South at Reith Road intersection to provide exclusive left turn lanes for each approach, and exclusive right turn lanes for northbound and southbound traffic on Military Road South and westbound traffic on Reith Road Modify the existing traffic signal The project will include the construction of full width paving, paved shoulders, street lighting, storm drainage, utilities and appurtenances. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering. $100,000 Right of Way Acquisition $50,000 Construction . . . . $900,000 TOTAL........................................$l,050,000 FUNDING SOURCE (S): AIP, City of Kent, STP Partially Funded PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The level of development on the Kent West Hill, coupled with the growth in the Puget Sound area and the regularly occurring congestion along both Pacific Highway South and Interstate 5 results in significant congestion at this intersection in the morning and evening peak hours A1P-Artcnal Improvement Program[State],CIIAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FAST—Freight Action Strategy for EverettSeaule-Tacoma Corridor,FMSIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Imestment Board[State],FTA—Federal Transit Adrrumstration[Federal],NLS—Hazard Elimination[Fcdcril),17S—Intclbgmt Transportation Systems[Fedcral),LID— Local Improvement District,PWTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State],STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal], TIA—Transportation Improvement Account,TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State],TPP—'transportation Partnership Program[State] I 78 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2004 PROJECT: South 228th Street Corridor- Phase I Military Road South to 54'h Avenue South DESCRIPTION: Preliminary engineering and construction of a new five-lane roadway from SR-516 along Military Road South to approximately Bolger Road, then from Military Road South to 54th Avenue South, including a new bridge over the Green River. The project will include the construction of full- width paving; a bridge, concrete curbs, gutters, sidewalks and/or paved shoulders; street lighting, storm drainage, landscaping, utilities and appurtenances. The project may include the installation of traffic signals at the Comdor's intersections with Military Road South and Lakeside Boulevard. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering. $4,800,000 Right of Way Acquisition $1,800,000 Construction .. ..... .... S20,400,000 TOTAL......................................$27,0009000 FUNDING SOURCE (S): TPP,City of Kent, LID, TIE,FMSIB, PWTF PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: James Street and Meeker Street `corridors' are not feasible to widen sufficiently to accommodate forecast traffic volumes and future development West Meeker Street currently represents the only east-west arterial that crosses the Green River between SR 516 and South 212'h Street This project will provide required east-west capacity AIP-Artenal Improvement Program[State],CMAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality(Federal),FAST—Ficight Action Strategy for Everett-Seawc-Tacoma Corridor,FMSIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA—Federal Transit Administration[Federal],UES—Haurd Elimination[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems(Federal),LID— Local Improvement District,PH'TF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State],STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal], TIA—Transportation improvement Account,TIB—Transportation improvement Board[State],TPP—Transponation Partnership Program[State] 8 79 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2004 PROJECT: Central Avenue and Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad Grade Crossings Signals I ntertie DESCRIPTION: Improvements to the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad grade crossing signals Includes installation of detector loops near the grade crossing and the mtertie cable in underground conduit between the railroad grade signal and the corresponding traffic signal on Central Avenue at five artenals(East James Street, East Smith Street,East Meeker Street, East Gowe Street, and East Willis Street). PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering.. . . $20,000 Right of Way Acquisition .. .. .. ...$0 Construction $120,000 TOTAL...........................................$14 0,000 FUNDING SOURCE (S): City of Kent, ITS PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: These improvements t o the railroad grade c rossing s ignals enhance the safety of the arterial street crossings of the Burlington Northem/Santa Fe Railroad, a requirement of the Washington Utilities and Trade Commission (WUTC) to allow increased train operating speeds for passenger and freight rail The increase in operating speed (with appropriate safety upgrades) is essential to increasing the number of trains through the region, improving mobility and capacity for freight rail and passenger rail. Central Avenue is a Principal Arterial street,roughly parallel to the BNSFRR and approximately 480 feet easterly of the centerline of the BNSFRR tracks AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State],CMAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FAST—Freight Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FM.SIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA—Federal Transit Administration[Federal],LIES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],IIS—intelligent Transportation Systcros[Federal],LID— Local Improvement District,PWTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State],STP—Surrace Transportation Program[Federal], TIA—Transportation Improvement Account,TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State],TPP—Transportation Partnership Program[State] 9 80 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2004 PROJECT: South 228th Street/Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad Grade Separation Project Grade Separation crossing at Burlington Northem/Santa Fe Railroad DESCRIPTION: Construct grade separation of the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad mainline tracks at South 2281h Street. The project will include the construction of a railroad bridge, road underpass, full-width paving, concrete curbs, gutters, and sidewalks, street lighting, utilities and appurtenances PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering. $2,250,000 Right of Way Acquisition $1,000,000 Construction .$13,750,000 TOTAL......................................$179000,000 FUNDING SOURCE (S): City of Kent, TIB, PWTF loan, FAST, FMSIB, Burlington Northern/Santa Fe Railroad PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The project will lead to a seamless connection between major freight handlers and their primary destinations This project will support freight moving through Kent to the Ports of Seattle and Tacoma, Sea-Tac Airport and the freeway system Grade separating the arterial will increase both rail and roadway capacity, decrease congestion, enhance safety, and improve freight mobility in this corridor and throughout the region This project will provide regional connections between thousands of businesses,employers, and 40 million square feet of warehouse/industnal space The level of freight and passenger rail traffic on the BNSF Railroad mainline is rising as a consequence of increased traffic in the Puget Sound area, and new Sound Transit and Amtrak service A1P-Arterial Improvement Program[State),CMAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FAST—Freight Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FMSIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State),FTA—Federal Transit Administration[Federal],HES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems[Federal],LID— Local Improvement District,PWTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State],STP—Surface Transporialion Program[Federal], TIA—Transportation Improvement Account,TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State], TPP—Transporiation Partnership Program[State] 10 81 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2004 PROJECT: South 228'h Street/Union Pacific Railroad Grade Separation Project Grade Separation crossing at Union Pacific Railroad DESCRIPTION: Construct grade separation of the Union Pacific Railroad mainline tracks at South 228'4 Street The project will include the construction of a railroad bridge structure, a bicycle and pedestrian bridge, and a road underpass; full-width paving; concrete curbs, gutters and sidewalks; street lighting, utilities and appurtenances. PROJECT COST: Prehmmary Engineering.. . . . . $3,000,000 Right of Way Acquisition .$1,000,000 Construction . .. S17,000,000 TOTAL.....................................$2170009000 FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent, T1B, PWTF loan, FAST, FMSIB, Union Pacific Railroad PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The project will lead to a seamless connection between major freight handlers and their primary destinations This project will support freight moving through Kent to the Ports of Seattle and Tacoma, Sea-Tac Airport and the freeway system. Grade separating this arterial will increase both rail and roadway capacity, decrease congestion, enhance safety, improve freight mobility in this corridor and throughout the region. This project will provide regional connections for thousands of businesses,employers, and the 40 million square feet of warehouse/industnal space in the valley AIP-Arsenal Improvement Program[State],C'MAQ—Congestion Mmgauon and Air Quality[Federal],FAST—Freight Action Strategy for Everett•Seatile-Tacoma Corridor,FM.SIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA—Federal Transit Administration[Federal],I ES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems[Federal],LID— Loral Improvement District,PHTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[Slate],STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal], TIA—Transportation Improvement Account,TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State],TPP—Transportation Partnership Program[State] 11 82 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2004 PROJECT: Interurban Trail Crossings Signal Interconnect West Meeker Street and West Smith Street DESCRIPTION: Interconnect the existing traffic signals at the Interurban Trail crossings at West Meeker Street and West Smith Street to the Union Pacific crossing signals at said streets PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering. S30,000 Construction .$240,000 Right of Way Acquisition . S-0- TOTAL...........................................$270,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S): STP, City of Kent PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This project is required in order to interconnect the existing street signals with the railroad crossing signals It will eliminate potential conflict where traffic could backup across the railroad tracks AIP-Artenal Improvement Program[State],CMAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal),FAST—Freight Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FMSIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[Sta(e),FTA—Federal Transit Administration[Federal),HES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems[Federal],LID— Local Improvement District,PWTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State],STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal], TIA—Transportation Improvement Account,TIS—Transportation Improvement Board[State],TPP—Transportation Partnership Program[State] 12 83 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2004 PROJECT: South 212ih Street Pavement Rehabilitation Green River Bridge to West Valley Highway(SR 181) DESCRIPTION: Remove and rehabilitate the existing roadway pavement to add additional service life to the asphalt roadway b etween the G reen River bridge and West Valley Highway(SR 181). This project will include the removal and replacement of the upper two inches of the existing asphalt pavement in the curb lanes in both directions, and a full-width asphalt pavement overlay of the entire roadway This project will also include the selective replacement of catch basin inlets and driveway approach aprons, and sections of concrete curbs and gutters PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering. S45,000 Right of Way Acquisition .. $-0- Construction . .. . S635,000 TOTAL...........................................$680,000 FUNDING SOURCE (S): STP, City of Kent Funded PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The existing asphalt pavement along this section of South 2121h Street is exhibiting signs of distress, as demonstrated by "alligatoring", longitudinal cracking, and cracking of the concrete curbs and gutters The end of the service life of this roadway has been reached Reconstruction of the pavement to extend the service life of the roadway and prevent further degradation is required AIP-Aricnal lmprovcmcnt Program[Stale],CMAQ-Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FAST-Freight Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FM5111-Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA-Federal Transit Administration[Federal],IILS-Hazard Elimination[Fcderal],1TS-intelligent Transportation Systems[Federal],LID- Local improvement District,PifTf-Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State],STP-Surface Transportation Program[Federal], TIA-Transportation Improvement Account,TIB-Transportation Improvement Board[State],TPP—Transportation Partnership Program[State] 13 84 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2004 PROJECT: 84tb Avenue South Pavement Rehabilitation SR 167 to South 212`h Street DESCRIPTION: Remove and rehabilitate the existing roadway pavement to add additional service life to the roadway between SR 167 and South 212`h Street This project will include the removal and replacement of the existing pavement in the curb lanes in both directions, and a full-width asphalt concrete overlay of the entire roadway, and will also include the selective replacement of catch basin inlets and driveway approach aprons, curbs and gutters PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering .. $145,000 Right of Way Acquisition . . $-0- Construction S585'000 TOTAL..........................................$73%000 FUNDING SOURCE (S): STP,City of Kent PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The existing pavement along this section of 841" Avenue South is showing signs of structural distress as demonstrated by "alligatoring", longitudinal cracking, and cracking of the curbs and gutters An inverted crown section also occurs at the former curb line along many of the sections of this street. This inverted crown section results in the pondmg of stormwater in the street along the seam line, which increases the failure rate of the roadway pavement AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State],CMAQ-Congcstion Mitigation and Air Quality[Fcdcral],FAST-Freight Action Strategy for Everett•Seattle-Tacoma Condor,FMS1B-Freight Mobility Strategic investment Board[State],FTA-Federal Transit Administration [Federal],HCS-Hazard Elimination[Fedcral],17S-Intelligent Transportation Systems[Federal],LID- Local Improvement District,P97F-Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State],.STP-Surface Transportation Program[Federal], TIA-Transportation Improvement Account, TIB-Transportation improvement Board[State],TPP—Transportation Partnership Program[State] 14 85 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2005 PROJECT: 72"d Avenue South Extension South 200'h Street to South 196'h Street DESCRIPTION: Construct a new four-lane roadway from South 2001h Street to South 196'h Street. The project will include the crossing of Mill Creek and construction of full-width paving, concrete curbs, gutters, and sidewalks, street lighting, storm drainage;landscaping; utilities and appurtenances PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering. $160,000 Right of Way Acquisition $680,000 Construction $580,000 TOTAL........................................$1,420,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Continued development in the northern Kent industrial area, and high levels of congestion along West Valley Highway between the South ISO"' Street and South 196'h Street condors, mandate additional north-south arsenal capacity. This project provides some relief for South Ig0'h Street, South 196t'' Street, and South 212'h Street intersections along West Valley Highway It also provides improved access to the South 196'h Street condor from industrial development along 72"d Avenue South AIP-Arsenal Improvement Program[Sta[e],CMAQ-Congmion Mitigation and Au Quality[Federal],FAST-Frcight Action Strategy for Everett-Seatile-Tacoma Condor,FAISIB-Freight Mobility Strategic investment Board[State],FTA-Federal Transit Admmmration[Federal],RES-Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS-Intelligent Transportation Systems[Federal],LID- Local Impro�emeni District,PWTF-Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State],STP-Surface Transportation Program[Federal], 77.4-Transponanon Improvement Account, T18-Transportation Improvement Board[State],TPP—Transportation Partnership Program[State] 15 86 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM I I YEAR: 2005 i PROJECT: South 277'h Street Corridor Extension Widen 110 Avenue Southeast from Kent-Kangley Road (SR 516)to Southeast 256'°Street DESCRIPTION: Widen 116"i Avenue Southeast to provide a five-lane roadway, including four general-purpose travel lanes, a two-way left turn lane and a bicycle facility. Also included in this project will be the widening of the intersection of Kent-Kangley Road and 116'h Avenue Southeast to add an additional left turn lane to provide dual left turn lanes westbound on Kent- Kangley Road to southbound 116'h Avenue Southeast The project will include the construction of paving; concrete curbs, gutters, sidewalks; bicycle lanes; paved shoulders; street lighting; storm drainage, utilities and appurtenances. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering. .. ..S300,000 Right of Way Acquisition. ..... .$210,000 Construction $1,450,000 TOTAL........................................$]9960,000 FUNDING SOURCE (S): TIB, City of Kent, LID PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This project extends the South 277'h Street Corridor northward to Southeast 256'h Street. Traffic studies have indicated that traffic demand will continue to increase on this section of 116'h Avenue This roadway facilitates traffic from Southeast 256'h Street to the 272nd/277'h Street Corridor AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State],CMAQ—Congcsuon Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FAST—Ficight Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FMSIB—Freight Mobihry Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA—Federal Transit Administration[Federal],iiES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],iTS—Intelligent Transportation Systems(Federal],LID— Local l mprovemeni Disinct,P 47F—Public Works Trust Fund Loan lStalel,STP—Surface Transponation Program[Federal], TIA—Transportation Improvement Account, TIB—Transportation Improvemem Board[State],TPP—Transponatitin Partnership Program[State] 16 87 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2005 PROJECT: Central Avenue South Pavement Rehabilitation Green River Bridge to East Willis Street(SR 516) DESCRIPTION: Remove and rehabilitate the existing roadway pavement to add additional service life to the roadway, between the Green River Bridge and East Willis Street (SR 516. This project will include the removal and replacement of the upper two inches of the existing pavement in the curb lanes in both directions, and a full-width asphalt concrete overlay of the entire roadway, and will also include the selective replacement of c atch basin inlets, and driveway approach aprons, as well as curbs and gutters PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering. $50,000 Right of Way Acquisition $0 Construction . ... $550,000 TOTAL...........................................$6009000 FUNDING SOURCE (S): STP, City of Kent PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The existing paving along this section of Central Avenue South is exhibiting signs of distress, as demonstrated by"alligatonng", longitudinal cracking, and c racking of t he c urbs a nd gutters. T he s ervice 1 ife o f t his roadway has been reached, necessitating reconstruction of the pavement to extend the service life of the roadway, and prevent further pavement degradation AIP-Artenal Improvement Program[Slate],CMAQ—Congestion M uigauon and Air Quality[Federal],FAST—Freight Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor.FM.S18—Freight Mobihiy Strategx investment Board(State],PTA—Federal Transit Administration lFcderal),ILLS—Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS—Intclligenl Transportation Systems[Federal],LID— Local improvement District,PWTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State],.STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal], TIA—Transportation Improvement Account,TIB—Transportation Improvement Board tState],TPP—Transportation Partnership Program[State] 17 as CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2006 PROJECT: Military Road Soutb Widenini-Pbase 1 38th Avenue South to South 248 Street DESCRIPTION: Widen and re-channehze Military Road South to provide an interim three- lane roadway, including two general-purpose travel lanes, and a two-way left turn lane. The project will include the construction of full width � paving, street channelization, street lighting,utilities and appurtenances PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering .. S55,000 Right of Way Acquisition . $-0- Construction .. .. $135,000 TOTAL...........................................$1902000 FUNDING SOURCE (S): City of Kent PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The level of development along this section of Military Road South has reached the point where a three-lane roadway section is required to accommodate through traffic and provide safe left turn access into the commercial center southwest of the National Guard facility. AIP-Arteridl lmprovemenl Program[State],CMAQ—Congcsnon Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],rAST—Freight Action Strategy for Everell-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FMSIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA—Federal Transit Administration[Federal],HES—Hazard Elimination[Fedcril],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems[Federal],LID— Local Improvement District,PWTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State],STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal], TIA—Transportation Improvement Account,TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State],TPP—Transportation Partnership Program[State] 1s 89 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2006 PROJECT: Willis Street (SR 516)/Union Pacific Railroad Grade Separation Project Grade Separation Crossing at Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) DESCRIPTION: Construct grade separation of the Union Pacific Railroad's mainline tracks at Willis Street (SR 516) The project will provide more efficient movement of goods and services and will relieve congestion due to train traffic on the UPRR of approximately 20 trains per day. This results in an accumulated delay of more than 32 minutes per day at this intersection l alone The project will include the construction of a railroad bridge, a roadway under crossing, full-width paving; concrete curbs, gutters, and sidewalks, street lighting; utilities and appurtenances PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering ... . $4,000,000 Right of Way Acquisition . . .. . . $0 Construction . .. . .. S 16,000,000 TOTAL.....................................S20,000,000 FUNDING SOURCE (S): City of Kent, FAST,FMS1B,Union Pacific Railroad PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This project supports east-west freight and commuter mobility in the Green River Valley. More than 27,000 vehicles per day travel on Willis Street, including over 800 freight-bearing trucks The level of freight traffic on the UP Railroad mainline is also increasing as a consequence of economic conditions in the Puget Sound area. Grade separations provide the solution to the costly problem of congestion. The RR crossing will no longer impede freight and other traffic flow Reductions in traffic congestion on adjoining streets and reduced environmental impacts caused by traffic congestion is also expected This project will enhance Kent as an economic generator and provide regional connections for thousands of businesses, employers,and commuters AiP-Anenal Improvement Program[State],CMAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FAST—Freight Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FM.71B—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State),FTA—Federal Transit Administration[Federal],1XS—Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems[Federal],LID— Local Improvement District,P47F—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State],STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal], TIA—Transportation improvement Account,TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State],TPP—Transporiauon Partnership Program[State] 19 90 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2006 PROJECT: Willis Street (SR 516)/Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad Grade Separation Project Grade Separation Crossings at Burlington Northern/Santa Fe Railroad (BNSFRR) DESCRIPTION: Construct grade separation at the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad mainline tracks at Willis Street (SR 516) The project will provide more efficient movement of goods and services and will relieve congestion due to train traffic on the BNSFRR of approximately 40 trains per day. This results in an accumulated delay of an hour each day at this intersection j alone The project will include the construction of a railroad bridge; vehicle under crossing, full-width paving; concrete curbs, gutters, and sidewalks, street lighting, utilities and appurtenances PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering . .. . . $3,000,000 Right of Way Acquisition .. $3,000,000 Construction .. . .. ..$11,000,000 TOTAL........................................17,000,000 FUNDING SOURCE (S): City of Kent, FAST, FMSIB, Burlington Norlhern/Santa Fe Railroad PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This project supports east-west freight and commuter mobility in the Green River Valley More than 27,000 vehicles per day travel on Willis Street, including over 800 freight-bearing trucks The level of freight and passenger rail traffic on the BNSF Railroad mainline is also increasing as a consequence of economic conditions in the Puget Sound area Grade separation provides the solution to the costly problem of congestion The railroad crossing will no longer impede freight and other traffic flow Reductions in traffic congestion on adjoining streets and reduced environmental impacts caused by traffic congestion is also expected This project will enhance Kent as an economic generator and provide regional connections for thousands of businesses,employers, and commuters A1P-Arterial Improvement Program[State],CMAQ-Congcsuon Mingauon and Air Quality[Federal],I-AST-Freight Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Comdor,FMSIB-Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board IState],FTA-Federal Transit Administration[Federal],H£S-Hazard Elimination[Federal],iM-Intelligent Transportation Systems[Federal],LID- Local Improvement District,PWTF-Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State],STP-Surface Transportation Program[Federal], VA-Transportation improvement Account, T18-Transportation Improvement Board[State],TPP—Transportation Partnership Program[State] 20 91 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2007 PROJECT: 80'h Avenue South Wideoing South 1961h Street to South 188th Street DESCRIPTION: Widen 801h Avenue South from South 196th Street to South 188th Street to five lanes This will include four general-purpose lanes and a two-way left tum lane The project will also include the construction of full-width paving; concrete curbs, gutters, and sidewalks; street lighting; storm drainage; utilities and appurtenances. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering. .. S130,000 Right of Way Acquisition S285,000 Construction $515,000 TOTAL...........................................S930,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S): City of Kent, LID PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The opening of the 190h Street Corridor on the south end of the project and Renton's completion of Oaksdale Avenue South will result in 801h Avenue South being a significant north/south corridor serving the industrial area As a result,the increased traffic volumes along this section of 80"'Avenue South could reach the point where a consistent five-lane roadway section is required to provide safe left turn access into the adjoining properties Further, concrete curbs and gutters are required to provide c ontrol o f roadway d rainage a nd t o p revent i mpacts to a djacent property owners Sidewalks and street lighting are to provide safe access for pedestrians. 41P-Arterial Improvement Program[Staicl,CM.1Q-Congestion Mmgarion and Air Quality[Frdcrall,/'AST-Freight Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FM.SIB-Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA-Federal Transit Administration[Federal],HLS-Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS-Intelligent Transportation Systems[Federal],LID- Local Improvement District,PWTF-Public Works Trust Fund Loan ISiate],STP-Surface Transportation Program[Federal], 77A-Transportation Improvement Account,TIB-Transportation improvement Board[State],TPP—Transportation Partnership Program[State] 21 92 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: EAR: 2007 PROJECT: South 272nd Street Widening-Phase I 26tb Avenue South to Military Road South DESCRIPTION: Widen the intersection of South 272nd Street and Military Road South to extend the existing left turn pockets on the west and north approaches and also add an 1100 foot right turn lane on the north approach. The South 272nd Street 1-5 undererossing will be excavated and the existing four lanes under the bridge widened to seven lanes. These lanes will include four general-purpose lanes, a two-way left turn lane, and two lanes held m reserve for Phase III of this project. This project will also include the construction of full width paving (including shoulders), drainage,utilities and appurtenances. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineenng. . . $1,100,000 Right of Way Acquisition .. . $900,000 Construction ... ... ....... $5,700,000 TOTAL........................................$7,700,000 FUNDING SOURCE (S): STP, City of Kent, City of Federal Way, King County, Sound Transit, TPP PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The traffic volumes along this section of South 272"d Street have reached the point where additional lanes are required to reduce congestion. Additional lanes are also required under I-5 to reduce congestion The additional length of the right turn lane from Military Road South will help prevent extensive backups in the southbound lane The project will also relieve congestion near the northside Park and Ride lot AIP-Arterial Improement Program[Statc],C'MAQ-Congcstion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FAST-Freight Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FAfSIB-Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board IState),FTA-Federal Transit Administration(Federal],iiES-Hazard Elimination(Federall,ITS-Intelligent Transportation Systems[Federal],LID- Local Improvement District,PWTF-Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State],.STP-Surface Transportation Program[Federal], TIA-Transportation improvement Account,TIB-Transportation Improvement Board [State],TPP-Transportation Partnership Program[State] 22 93 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2007 PROJECT: South 272nd Street Widening- Phase II Pacific Highway South(SR 99) to 26t" Avenue South DESCRIPTION: Widen South 272nd Street to add one westbound left turn lane at the intersection of South 272nd Street and Pacific Highway South and left turn lanes at the South Star Lake Road intersection. If feasible, construction of curb, gutter, and sidewalks, street lighting, storm drainage facilities, utilities a nd appurtenances w ill b e d eferred u ntil Phase 111 of the S outh 272nd Street Widening Project PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering $100,000 Right of Way Acquisition. . .. . . .150,000 Construction .. .. $650,000 TOTAL...........................................$800,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S): STP,City of Kent,T1B PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Traffic volumes along this section of South 272"d Street have reached the point where widening and additional turn lanes are required to reduce congestion at the intersections and prevent backups between Pacific Highway South and 1-5. This project will coordinate with access to the site of a proposed southside Park and Ride lot and with City of Federal Way improvements west of Pacific Highway South. AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State],CMAQ-Congestion Mitigation and Au Quality[Federal],PAST-freight Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FMSIB-Freight Mobiiny Strategic iri esiment Board[State),FTe-Federal Transit Administration[Federal),HCS-Hazard Elimination[Feder]],I lM Intelligent Transportation Systems[Fedrral],LID- Local improvement District,PWTF-Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State],STP-Surface Transportation Program[Federal], TiA-Transportation lrnprovenwnt Account,TiB-Transportation Improvement Board[State),TPP—Transportation Partnership Program[State] 23 94 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2008 PROJECT: South 272nd Street Widening-Phase III Pacific Highway South to Military Road South and I-5 HOV Loop Ramp DESCRIPTION: Add two HOV Lanes from Pacific Highway South (SR 99) to Military Road South An HOV loop-ramp from eastbound South 272nd Street to northbound I-5 will also be constructed Construction will include full width paving, concrete curb, gutter, and sidewalks, street lighting; storm drainage, utilities, and appurtenances PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering $800,000 Right of Way Acquisition , $500,000 Construction ... . . . . .36,200,000 TOTAL...................................... $7,5001000 FUNDING SOURCE (S): STP, City of Kent, TB PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Traffic volumes between Pacific Highway South and Military Road South have reached the point where improvements supporting HOV- added capacity are required to reduce congestion at the intersections and reduce backups approaching 1-5 The HOV lanes will provide access to The norihside Park and Ride lot and the site of a proposed southside Park and Ride lot. Adding HOV lanes and HOV access to 1-5 supports vanous County and City of Federal Way transportation and transit improvement projects AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State], CMAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FAST—Freight Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FM.SlB—Frcight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[Slate],FTA—Federal Transit Administration[Federal],HES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],/TS—Intelligent Transportation Systems[Federal],LID— Local Improvement District,PWTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State],.STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal], 714—Transportation Improvement Account,TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State],TPP—Transportation Partnership Program[State] 24 95 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2008 t PROJECT: South 2281b Street Corridor- Phase III 84'h Avenue South to 100 Avenue Southeast(Benson Road) (SR 515) I DESCRIPTION: Construct a new three to five-lane roadway from 84'h Avenue South to 100 Avenue Southeast (Benson Highway) (SR 515), including a new bridge over SR 167, and modify the traffic signals at the intersection of South 2241h Street and 84'h Avenue South. The project will include the construction of full-width paving, concrete curbs, gutters, and sidewalks, street lighting; storm drainage, bicycle lanes; landscaping; utilities and appurtenances PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering $1,500,000 Right of Way Acquisition . ... $4,800,000 Construction $18,700,000 TOTAL......................................$259000,000 FUNDING SOURCE (S): TPP, King County,City of Kent, LID PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Additional capacity is required to accommodate existing development in the East Hill area of the City The James Street and South 208'h/2121h Street 'comdors' are infeasible to widen to accommodate forecast traffic volumes without additional east-west capacity, based upon existing development and topographic constraints AIP-Ancria)Improvement Program[State],CMAQ—Congestion Mnigauon and Air Quality[Federal I,1"AST—Freight Action Strategy for Everett-Seattic-Tacoma Corridor,FAISIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA—Federal Transit Administration[Federal],11ES—?tazard ELmmaiion[Federal],17S—lniclLgent Transponation Systems IFcderal],LID— Local Improvement District,PMTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State],STP—Surface Transportation Program(Federal], TIA—Transportation Improvement Account.TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State],TPP—Transportation Partnership Program[State] 25 96 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2004 -2009 PROJECT: Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements Ongoing Citywide Program DESCRIPTION: Make miscellaneous improvements to the City's Bicycle Route and Pedestrian system Potential projects include improvements to 100`h Avenue Southeast north of South 240th Street; Southeast 248th Street east of 90 Avenue South, and 152"d Way Southeast north of Southeast 272"d Street. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering . . $60,000 Right of Way Acquisition. . . $-0- Construction $562,000 TOTAL..........................................$625,000 FUNDING SOURCE (S): STP, City of Kent PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This project complies with the City's CTR(Commute Trip Reduction) Ordinance and the City Comprehensive Plan This project helps to reduce peak hour single-occupant vehicle trips, encourage the use of non- motorized transportation modes, and provide safe routes for school-age pedestrians and cyclists AfP-Arterial Improvement Program[State],CMAQ-Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal),rAST-Freight Action Strategy for Evereti-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,fM51B-Freight Mobility Strategic Insesiment Board[State],FTA-Federal Transit Administration[Federal);HES-Hazard Elimination[Fedcral),1TS-Intelligent Transportation Systems[Federal),LID- Local Improvement District,PWTF-Public Works Trust Fund Loan[Slate],STP-Surface Transportation Program[Federal], TJA-Transportation Improvement Account,TIB-Transportation Improvement Board[State],TPP—Transportation Partnership Program[State] 26 97 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2004-2009 PROJECT: Guardrail and Safety Improvements Ongoing Citywide Program DESCRIPTION: Make miscellaneous guardrail improvements each year to enhance motorist safety Candidate projects include Frager Road and 100'h Avenue Southeast (near the 22600 block) Upgrade exisling guardrail end- treatments as mandated by State and Federal regulations. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering.... $20,000 Right of Way Acquisition . $-0- Construction . $175,000 TOTAL...........................................S195,000 FUNDING SOURCE (S): STP, HES,City of Kent PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This project is mandated by compliance with Federal and State regulations, and the requirement to eliminate potentially hazardous roadway conditions. AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State],CMAQ-Congesuon Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FAST-Freight Action Strategy for Everett•Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FAfSIB-Freight Mobility Sirategic Investment Board[State],FTA-Federal Transit Administration[Federal],11E•S-Hazard Ehminaiion[Fedcmll,I7S-Intelligent Transportation Systems[Federal],LID- Local Improve meni District,PHTF-Public Works Trust Fund Loan(Stale],.STP-Surface Transportation Program[Federal], TIA-Transportation Improvement Account,TIB-Transportation Improvement Board[State],TPP—Transportation Partnership Program[State) 27 98 CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2004 - 2009 PROJECT: Americans with Disabilities Act Compliance Sidewalk Repair and Rehabilitation Ongoing Citywide Program DESCRIPTION: Reconstruct and repair existing sidewalks and pedestrian ramps, and install new hard-surfaced sidewalks to implement the requirements of the Federal Government's Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) This project will include an inventory of the City's sidewalk/walkway facilities, and identification and correction of existing deficiencies This project will also include the construction of concrete curbs, gutters and sidewalks; minor storm drainage; and appurtenances PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering. ..... $200,000 Right of Way Acquisition .... $-0- ' Construction . $1,750,000 TOTAL........................................$1,9 509000 FUNDING SOURCE (S): City of Kent PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This project is mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA). It repairs existing sidewalks, replaces deficient/substandard and/or missing wheelchair/pedestnan ramps, and brings same into compliance with the adopted Federal standards AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State),CMAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Au Quality[Federal],FAST—Freight Action Strategy for Everen-Seattle-Tacoma Corndor,FM.SIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA—Federal Transit Administration[Federal],HES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],US—Intelligent Transportation Systems[Federal],LID— Local improvement District,PWTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State],.STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal], TIA—Transportation improvement Account, TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State],TPP—Transportation Partnership Program[State] 28 99 • CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM YEAR: 2004 - 2009 PROJECT: Commuter/Shopper Shuttle Bus Ongoing Citywide Program DESCRIPTION: Continue to provide enhanced transit service in the Downtown Kent business area through the use of a fixed-route shuttle service, with demand-responsive routing capabilities. Service route points will include King County Metro Park and Ride, South King County Regional Justice Center, and Kent City Hall, as well as local shopping and medical facilities. PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering.... . S_0- Right of Way Acquisition ..S-0- Operations $140,000 TOTAL...........................................S140,000 *City share,which is equivalent to the lost fare box revenue that the county could have collected were not the city wanting a free service,(based on 6 years operating cost with 3% inflation) FUNDING SOURCE (S): King County, City of Kent PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The Shopper Shuttle provides mobility and independence to many of the city's seniors as well as school children and other citizens with limited mobility options. The service addresses a significant transit market that may not be able to use the county's more traditional routes, and helps the city meet its road safety and transportation demand management goals AIP-Ailcrial Improvement Progrdm[State],CMAQ—Congestion Mitigation and An Quality[Federal],FAST—Freight Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma(Condor,FMSIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[Slate],FTA—Federal Transn Administration[Federal],LIES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],17S—Intelligent Transportation Systems[Fedcrall,LID— Local Improvement District,PWTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State],STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal], TIA—Transportation Improvement Account,TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State],TPF—Transportation Partnership Program[State] 29 91 I } �w � 9 LL- r' o m.= ✓ `y Int Valley Fw 100 5 -J I � Y• J _ alle Fw ♦[II IV[ i a € I r" 4 v � `J oP 2 0 : a O 0 .;� x ,c o S ; ° _ to < O R M /`/��� L11 T iY to � O O R a Kent City Council Meeting Date September 16, 2003 Category Public Hearings 1. SUBJECT: 2004 ANNUAL BUDGET (FIRST HEARING) 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: This is the first public hearing on the 2004 budget. The second hearing is scheduled for November 18 at the regular City Council meeting. We welcome public input as the City begins to prepare for its 2004 budget. 3. EXHIBITS: None 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Finance Director (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) • 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: ��,�/`� A. Councilmember moves, Councilmember O seconds to close the public hearing. 1 ° B. Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds • DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 5C Kent City Council Meeting Date September 16, 2003 Category Public Hearings 1. SUBJECT: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2004-2009 (FIRST HEARING) 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: This is the first public hearing on the 2004—2009 Capital Improvement Program. The Capital Improvement Program includes all capital expenditures for the next 6 years as described in the Comprehensive Plan and is updated and incorporated into the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan on an annual basis. We encourage public input as the city plans for future capital facilities and infrastructure improvements. The second public hearing is scheduled for November 18. i 3. EXHIBITS: None • 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Finance Director (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: \ A. Councilmember W� moves, Councilmember seconds to close the public hearing. • DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 5D • Kent City Council Meeting Date September 16, 2003 Category Public Hearings 1. SUBJECT: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN/CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT— AMENDMENT (#CPA-2003-3) AND UPDATE TO CH. 12.13 KENT CITY CODE 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Kent City Code provides for imposition of school impact fees on behalf of any school district which provides the City a capital facilities plan; the plan is adopted by reference as part of the Capital Facilities Element of the Kent Comprehensive Plan. The Auburn, Kent and Federal Way School Districts have submitted updated Capital Facilities Plans for Council review and consideration, as required annually by Kent City Code. 3. EXHIBITS: Staff memo from Charlene Anderson dated 9/9/03 w/attached code references; Auburn, Kent and Federal Way School District Capital Facilities Plans, and • letter from Michael Newman 8/13/03 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Planning Staff (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: A. Councilmember 0 0moves, Councilmember Pseconds to close the public hearing. V B. Councilmember m ves, ouncilmember seconds to approve/modify/deny the roposed amendment to the 2003 Capital Facilities Element of the Kent Comprehensiv n and Ch. 12.13 of the Kent City Code and to direct the • City Attorney to prepare t e ne ssary ordinance. DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 5E COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Fred N. Satterstrom, AICP, Director PLANNING SERVICES KEN T Charlene Anderson,AICP, Manager W A S H I N G T O N Phone 253-856-5454 Fax 253-856-6454 Address- 220 Fourth Avenue S Kent,WA 98032-5895 DATE: SEPTEMBER 9, 2003 TO: MAYOR JIM WHITE, COUNCIL PRESIDENT JUDY WOODS AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: CHARLENE ANDERSON, AICP, PLANNING MANAGER THROUGH: MAYOR JIM WHITE SUBJECT: COMPREHENSIVE PLANICAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT AMENDMENT AND UPDATE TO CHAPTER 12.13 KENT CITY CODE 4CPA-2003-3 MOTION: None at this time. This issue will be decided concurrently with adoption of the 2004 Annual Budget and Capital Improvement Program. SUMMARY: Kent City Code provides for imposition of school impact fees on behalf of any school district which provides to the City a capital facilities plan; the plan is adopted by reference as part of the Capital Facilities Element of the Kent Comprehensive Plan. The school districts are required to submit for annual Council review their updated capital facilities plans. Based on the recently adopted Ordinance No 3650, the City Council holds the public hearing on the school district plans at the same time as the public hearing for the budget. The Auburn, Kent and Federal Way School Districts have submitted updated Capital Facilities Plans for Council review and consideration. The City of Kent 6-year Capital Improvement Program, considered along with the annual budget, also will update the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan. BUDGET IMPACT: None BACKGROUND: One of the planning goals under the Growth Management Act (RCW 36.70A.020) is to ensure that those public facilities and services necessary to support development are adequate and timely to serve the development without decreasing current service levels below minimum standards The Act (RCW 36.70A.070) also requires the Capital Facilities Element of the Kent Comprehensive Plan to inventory existing capital facilities, forecast future needs and provide for financing of those facilities. RCW 82.02.050 authorizes cities planning under the Growth Management Act to impose impact fees on development activity as part of the financing for public facilities needed to serve new growth and development. As a result, KCC 12.13 080 and 090 provide for imposition of school impact fees on behalf of any school district which provides to the City a capital facilities plan; the plan is adopted by reference as part of the Capital Facilities Element of the Kent Comprehensive Plan. The school districts are required to submit for annual Council review their updated capital facilities plans (KCC 12.13.060 & 070). The Auburn, Kent and Federal Way School Districts have submitted their 2003/4 — 2008/9 Capital Facilities Plans and are requesting amendments of the Kent Comprehensive Plan and Kent City Code Chapter 12.13 to reflect changes to impact fees resulting from new student population generated by new single family and multifamily residential development. The updated plans include an inventory of existing facilities, existing facility needs, expected future facility requirements, expected funding, and calculation of the impact fees according to the formula set forth in KCC 12.13.140. The Kent School District proposes increasing their existing school impact fees for single family units from $4,147 to $4,292 (an increase of$145 or 3.5%) and for multifamily units from $2,554 to $2,643 (an increase of$89 or 3.5%). The Federal Way School District proposes decreasing their existing school impact fees for single family units from $3,865 to $3,269 (a decrease of$596 or 15.4%) and for multifamily units from $1,086 to $940(a decrease of$146 or 13.4%). The Auburn School District proposes school impact fees for single family units of$4,528 and for multifamily units of $1,212. These impact fees are requested for the impoundment reservoir property only (reference 8/13/03 letter from Michael Newman). An interlocal agreement between the City of Kent and the Auburn School District is required for the collection of the impact fees. CA\pm S\Permit\Plan\CompPlanAmdments\2003\capfacihties2003updatecc2 doc Enclosures- School District Capital Facilities Plans,8/13/03 letter from Michael Newman,RCW 36 70A 020&070,RCW 82 02 050,KCC 12 13 060-090,KCC 12 13 140 cc Fred N.Satterstrom,AICP,CD Director Charlene Anderson,AICP,Planning Manager Project File#CPA-2003-2/KIVA#2032425 Parties of Record CPA-2003-3 Comprehensive Plan/Capital Facilities Element Amendment 9116/03 City Council Meeting Page 2 of 2 AA& AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT AVENUE TO EXCELLENCE August 13,2003 �1 Charlene Anderson CffY op KENT ERVICES City of Kent PLACING S 400 West Gowe Kent, Washington 98031 Dear Ms. Anderson: The Auburn School District is making a formal request to have our Capital Facilities Plan included with the City of Kent's Comprehensive Plan. The request comes from the recent decision by the City of Kent to sell the Kent Impoundment Area located in the Auburn School District for development of residential housing. Since this area is currently an isolated section of the City of Kent and the future of jurisdiction of this area is still not determined, the district is requesting the impact fees as listed in the Capital Facilities Plan on page 23. Single Family- $4,528 Multi-Family- $1,212 Please contact me if you need additional information. fS'n NewmZe te Sup nt dent s and O ations Copy to: Linda Cowan Jeff Grose 915 Fourth Street NE,Aubum,WA 98002-4452 (253)931-4930 Chapter 36.70A.020 RCW - e Washington State Legislature Page 1 of 2 ' .. —��� ~ . • YT.IL,;Y• i K•l+[i�ri'�i� ✓w a•_ �tv a.� WASH . STATt LEG1SLAiTO ��= t Legislature Home About Us E-Mad Lists Search Help �'.'✓1 I-,LF=S >>TITLE:%G>> CHAPTER 36 70A>>SECTION 36 70A 020 Print Version 711;^` C : 1 << "J6 70^. 020 >> 36 7 0A 030 RCW 36.70A.020 Planning goals. The following goals are adopted to guide the development and adoption of comprehensive plans and development regulations of those counties and cities that are required or choose to plan under RCW 36.70A 040. The following goals are not listed in order of priority and shall be used exclusively for the purpose of guiding the development of comprehensive plans and development regulations: (1) Urban growth. Encourage development in urban areas where adequate public facilities and services exist or can be provided in an efficient manner. (2) Reduce sprawl. Reduce the inappropriate conversion of undeveloped land into sprawling,low- density development. (3) Transportation. Encourage efficient multimodal transportation systems that are based on regional priorities and coordinated with county and city comprehensive plans. (4) Housing. Encourage the availability of affordable housing to all economic segments of the population of this state, promote a variety of residential densities and housing types, and encourage preservation of existing housing stock. (5) Economic development. Encourage economic development throughout the state that is consistent with adopted comprehensive plans, promote economic opportunity for all citizens of this state, especially for unemployed and for disadvantaged persons, promote the retention and expansion of existing businesses and recruitment of new businesses, recognize regional differences impacting economic development opportunities, and encourage growth in areas experiencing insufficient economic growth, all within the capacities of the state's natural resources, public services, and public facilities. (6) Property rights. Private property shall not be taken for public use without just compensation having been made.The property rights of landowners shall be protected from arbitrary and discriminatory actions. (7) Permits. Applications for both state and local government permits should be processed in a timely and fair manner to ensure predictability. (8) Natural resource industries. Maintain and enhance natural resource-based industries, including productive timber, agricultural,and fisheries industries. Encourage the conservation of productive forest lands and productive agricultural lands, and discourage incompatible uses. (9) Open space and recreation. Retain open space, enhance recreational opportunities, conserve fish and wildlife habitat, increase access to natural resource lands and water, and develop parks and recreation facilities. (10) Environment. Protect the environment and enhance the state's high quality of life, including Chapter 36.70A.020 RCW - a Washington State Legislature Page 2 of 2 air and water quality,and the availability of water. (11) Citizen participation and coordination. Encourage the involvement of citizens in the planning process and ensure coordination between communities and jurisdictions to reconcile conflicts. (12) Public facilities and services. Ensure that those public facilities and services necessary to support development shall be adequate to serve the development at the time the development is available for occupancy and use without decreasing current service levels below locally established minimum standards. (13)Historic preservation. Identify and encourage the preservation of lands, sites,and structures, that have historical or archaeological significance. [2002 c 154§1; 1990 1st ex s c 17§21 Chapter 36.70A.070 RCW - .le Washington State Legislature Page 1 of 5 ;_'{� WASHIN,GTON STATE LEGISLATOR E " Legislature Home About Us E-Mad Lists Search Help i t, _i S » TI-rI » CI V >PTER 36 N" >f1CCl I0I4 36 70A 070 Print Version :.o tin i 1,10 << _:6 70A 1_)70 >> 6 -!tA 080 RCW 36.70A.070 Comprehensive plans —Mandatory elements. The comprehensive plan of a county or city that is required or chooses to plan under RCW 36 70A 040 shall consist of a map or maps, and descriptive text covering objectives, principles,and standards used to develop the comprehensive plan.The plan shall be an internally consistent document and all elements shall be consistent with the future land use map. A comprehensive plan shall be adopted and amended with public participation as provided in RCW 36 70A 140. Each comprehensive plan shall include a plan, scheme,or design for each of the following. (1)A land use element designating the proposed general distribution and general location and extent of the uses of land,where appropriate,for agriculture,timber production, housing, commerce, industry, recreation,open spaces, general aviation airports, public utilities, public facilities, and other land uses. The land use element shall include population densities, budding intensities, and estimates of future population growth. The land use element shall provide for protection of the quality and quantity of ground water used for public water supplies.Where applicable, the land use element shall review drainage,flooding, and storm water run-off In the area and nearby jurisdictions and provide guidance for corrective actions to mitigate or cleanse those discharges that pollute waters of the state, including Puget Sound or waters entering Puget Sound. (2)A housing element ensuring the vitality and character of established residential neighborhoods that:(a) Includes an inventory and analysis of existing and projected housing needs that identifies the number of housing units necessary to manage projected growth; (b) includes a statement of goals, policies, objectives, and mandatory provisions for the preservation, improvement, and development of housing, including single-family residences; (c)identifies sufficient land for housing, including, but not limited to, government-assisted housing, housing for low-income families, manufactured housing, multifamily housing, and group homes and foster care facilities;and (d) makes adequate provisions for existing and projected needs of all economic segments of the community. (3)A capital facilities plan element consisting of: (a)An inventory of existing capital facilities owned by public entities, showing the locations and capacities of the capital facilities; (b)a forecast of the future needs for such capital facilities; (c)the proposed locations and capacities of expanded or new capital facilities; (d) at least a six-year plan that will finance such capital facilities within projected funding capacities and clearly identifies sources of public money for such purposes; and (e) a requirement to reassess the land use element if probable funding falls short of meeting existing needs and to ensure that the land use element, capital facilities plan element, and financing plan within the capital facilities plan element are coordinated and consistent. Park and recreation facilities shall be included in the capital facilities plan element (4)A utilities element consisting of the general location, proposed location, and capacity of all existing and proposed utilities, including, but not limited to, electrical lines,telecommunication Imes, and natural gas lines. (5) Rural element.Counties shall include a rural element including lands that are not designated Chapter 36.70A.070 RCW - ...a Washington State Legislature Page 2 of 5 for urban growth, agriculture,forest, or mineral resources.The following provisions shall apply to the rural element: (a) Growth management act goals and local circumstances. Because circumstances vary from county to county,in establishing patterns of rural densities and uses,a county may consider local circumstances,but shall develop a written record explaining how the rural element harmonizes the planning goals in RCW 36 70A.020 and meets the requirements of this chapter. (b) Rural development.The rural element shall permit rural development,forestry, and agriculture in rural areas. The rural element shall provide for a variety of rural densities, uses, essential public facilities, and rural governmental services needed to serve the permitted densities and uses. In order to achieve a variety of rural densities and uses,counties may provide for clustering,density transfer, design guidelines, conservation easements, and other innovative techniques that will accommodate appropriate rural densities and uses that are not characterized by urban growth and that are consistent with rural character. (c) Measures governing rural development. The rural element shall include measures that apply to rural development and protect the rural character of the area, as established by the county, by: (i)Containing or otherwise controlling rural development; (ii)Assuring visual compatibility of rural development with the surrounding rural area; (iii) Reducing the inappropriate conversion of undeveloped land into sprawling, low-density development in the rural area; (iv) Protecting critical areas, as provided in RCW 36 70A 060, and surface water and ground water resources; and (v) Protecting against conflicts with the use of agricultural, forest, and mineral resource lands designated under RCW 36 70A 170. (d) Limited areas of more intensive rural development. Subject to the requirements of this subsection and except as otherwise specifically provided in this subsection (5)(d), the rural element may allow for limited areas of more intensive rural development, including necessary public facilities and public services to serve the limited area as follows: (i) Rural development consisting of the infill, development, or redevelopment of existing commercial, industrial, residential, or mixed-use areas, whether characterized as shoreline development, villages, hamlets, rural activity centers, or crossroads developments.A commercial, industrial, residential,shoreline,or mixed-use area shall be subject to the requirements of (d)(iv)of this subsection, but shall not be subject to the requirements of(c)(u)and (iii)of this subsection.An industrial area is not required to be principally designed to serve the existing and projected rural population; (ii) The intensification of development on lots containing, or new development of,small-scale recreational or tourist uses, including commercial facilities to serve those recreational or tourist uses, that rely on a rural location and setting, but that do not include new residential development.A small- scale recreation or tourist use is not required to be principally designed to serve the existing and projected rural population. Public services and public facilities shall be limited to those necessary to serve the recreation or tourist use and shall be provided in a manner that does not permit low- density sprawl; (iii)The intensification of development on lots containing isolated nonresidential uses or new development of isolated cottage industries and isolated small-scale businesses that are not principally designed to serve the existing and projected rural population and nonresidential uses,but do provide job opportunities for rural residents. Rural counties may allow the expansion of small- Chapter 36.70A.070 RCW • ne Washington State Legislature Page 3 of 5 scale businesses as long as those small-scale businesses conform with the rural character of the area as defined by the local government according to RCW 36 70A 030(14). Rural counties may also allow new small-scale businesses to utilize a site previously occupied by an existing business as long as the new small-scale business conforms to the rural character of the area as defined by the local government according to RCW 36 70A 030(14). Public services and public facilities shall be limited to those necessary to serve the isolated nonresidential use and shall be provided in a manner that does not permit low-density sprawl; (iv)A county shall adopt measures to minimize and contain the existing areas or uses of more intensive rural development, as appropriate, authorized under this subsection. Lands included in such existing areas or uses shall not extend beyond the logical outer boundary of the existing area or use, thereby allowing a new pattern of low-density sprawl. Existing areas are those that are clearly identifiable and contained and where there is a logical boundary delineated predominately by the built environment, but that may also include undeveloped lands if limited as provided in this subsection. The copnty shall establish the logical outer boundary of an area of more intensive rural development. In establishing the logical outer boundary the county shall address (A)the need to preserve the character of existing natural neighborhoods and communities, (B) physical boundaries such as bodies of water, streets and highways, and land forms and contours, (C)the prevention of abnormally irregular boundaries, and (D)the ability to provide public facilities and public services in a manner that does not permit low-density sprawl; (v) For purposes of(d)of this subsection, an existing area or existing use is one that was in existence: (A) On July 1, 1990, in a county that was initially required to plan under all of the provisions of this chapter; (B) On the date the county adopted a resolution under RCW 36 70A 040(2), in a county that is planning under all of the provisions of this chapter under RCW 36 70A 040(2); or (C) On the date the office of financial management certifies the county's population as provided in RCW 36.70A 040(5), in a county that is planning under all of the provisions of this chapter pursuant to RCW 36.70A 040(5). (e) Exception.This subsection shall not be interpreted to permit in the rural area a major industrial development or a master planned resort unless otherwise specifically permitted under RCW 36 70A 360 and 36.70A 365. (6)A transportation element that implements, and is consistent with,the land use element. (a) The transportation element shall include the following subelements: (i) Land use assumptions used in estimating travel; (ii) Estimated traffic impacts to state-owned transportation facilities resulting from land use assumptions to assist the department of transportation in monitoring the performance of state facilities, to plan improvements for the facilities, and to assess the impact of land-use decisions on state-owned transportation facilities; (iii) Facilities and services needs, including: (A) An inventory of air, water, and ground transportation facilities and services, including transit alignments and general aviation airport facilities,to define existing capital facilities and travel levels as a basis for future planning.This inventory must include state-owned transportation facilities within the city or county'sjurisdiction boundaries; (B) Level of service standards for all locally owned arterials and transit routes to serve as a gauge Chapter 36.70A.070 RCW - ie Washington State Legislature Page 4 of 5 to judge performance of the system.These standards should be regionally coordinated; (C) For state-owned transportation facilities, level of service standards for highways,as prescribed in chapters 47 06 and 47 80 RCW, to gauge the performance of the system.The purposes of reflecting level of service standards for state highways in the local comprehensive plan are to monitor the performance of the system, to evaluate improvement strategies, and to facilitate coordination between the county's or city's six-year street, road, or transit program and the department of transportation's six-year investment program.The concurrency requirements of(b)of this subsection do not apply to transportation facilities and services of statewide significance except for counties consisting of islands whose only connection to the mainland are state highways or ferry routes. In these island counties, state highways and ferry route capacity must be a factor in meeting the concurrency requirements in (b)of this subsection; (D) Specific actions and requirements for bringing into compliance locally owned transportation facilities or services that are below an established level of service standard; (E) Forecasts of traffic for at least ten years based on the adopted land use plan to provide information on the location, timing, and capacity needs of future growth; (F) Identification of state and local system needs to meet current and future demands. Identified needs on state-owned transportation facilities must be consistent with the statewide multimodal transportation plan required under chapter 47 06 RCW; (iv) Finance, including: (A) An analysis of funding capability to fudge needs against probable funding resources; (B)A multiyear financing plan based on the needs identified in the comprehensive plan,the appropriate parts of which shall serve as the basis for the six-year street, road, or transit program required by RCW 35 77 010 for cities, RCW 36 81 121 for counties, and RCW 35 58 2795 for public transportation systems.The multiyear financing plan should be coordinated with the six-year improvement program developed by the department of transportation as required by RCW 47 05 030; (C) If probable funding falls short of meeting identified needs, a discussion of how additional funding will be raised,or how land use assumptions will be reassessed to ensure that level of service standards will be met; (v) Intergovernmental coordination efforts, including an assessment of the impacts of the transportation plan and land use assumptions on the transportation systems of adjacent jurisdictions; (vi) Demand-management strategies. (b)After adoption of the comprehensive plan by jurisdictions required to plan or who choose to plan under RCW 36 70A 040, local jurisdictions must adopt and enforce ordinances which prohibit development approval if the development causes the level of service on a locally owned transportation facility to decline below the standards adopted in the transportation element of the comprehensive plan,unless transportation improvements or strategies to accommodate the impacts of development are made concurrent with the development.These strategies may include increased public transportation service, ride sharing programs, demand management, and other transportation systems management strategies. For the purposes of this subsection (6)"concurrent with the development" shall mean that improvements or strategies are in place at the time of development,or that a financial commitment is in place to complete the improvements or strategies within six years. (c) The transportation element described in this subsection (6), and the six-year plans required by RCW 35.77.010 for cities, RCW 36.81.121 for counties, RCW 35.58.2795 for public transportation systems, and RCW 47 05 030 for the state, must be consistent. Chapter 36.70A.070 RCW • le Washington State Legislature Page 5 of 5 (7)An economic development element establishing local goals, policies, objectives, and provisions for economic growth and vitality and a high quality of life.The element shall include-(a)A summary of the local economy such as population,employment, payroll,sectors, businesses, sales, and other information as appropriate; (b) a summary of the strengths and weaknesses of the local economy defined as the commercial and industrial sectors and supporting factors such as land use, transportation,utilities, education,work force, housing, and natural/cultural resources; and (c)an identification of policies, programs, and projects to foster economic growth and development and to address future needs.A city that has chosen to be a residential community is exempt from the economic development element requirement of this subsection. (8)A park and recreation element that implements, and is consistent with, the capital facilities plan element as it relates to park and recreation facilities. The element shall include: (a) Estimates of park and recreation demand for at least a ten-year period; (b)an evaluation of facilities and service needs; and (c)an evaluation of intergovernmental coordination opportunities to provide regional approaches for meeting park and recreational demand. (9) It is the intent that new or amended elements required after January 1, 2002, be adopted concurrent with the scheduled update provided in RCW 36.70A 130. Requirements to incorporate any such new or amended elements shall be null and void until funds sufficient to cover applicable local government costs are appropriated and distributed by the state at least two years before local government must update comprehensive plans as required in RCW 36 70A 130. 12002 c 212§2;2002 c 154§2, 1998 c 171 §2,1997 c 429§7, 1996 c 239§1.Prior 1995 c 400§3,1995 c 377§1,19901st exs.c17§71 NOTES: Reviser's note:This section was amended by 2002 c 154 §2 and by 2002 c 212 § 2, each without reference to the other. Both amendments are incorporated in the publication of this section under RCW 1 12 025(2). For rule of construction, see RCW 1 12.025(1). Prospective application -- 1997 c 429 §§ 1-21: See note following RCW 36.70A 3201. Severability--1997 c 429: See note following RCW 36.70A 3201. Construction —Application -- 1995 c 400: "A comprehensive plan adopted or amended before May 16, 1995, shall be considered to be in compliance with RCW 36 70A 070 or 36 70A 110, as in effect before their amendment by this act, if the comprehensive plan is in compliance with RCW 36.70A 070 and 36 70A 110 as amended by this act. This section shall not be construed to alter the relationship between a county-wide planning policy and comprehensive plans as specified under RCW 36.70A 210. As to any appeal relating to compliance with RCW 36.70A 070 or 36.70A 110 pending before a growth management hearings beard on May 16, 1995, the board may take up to an additional ninety days to resolve such appeal. By mutual agreement of all parties to the appeal, this additional ninety- day period may be extended." [1995 c 400 §4.] Effective date—1995 c 400: See note following RCW 36 70A 040. Chapter 82.02.050 RCW Washington State Legislature Page 1 of 2 'WASHINGTON STATE LEGISLATURV�� Legislature Home About Us E-Mail Lists Search Help I . _ Al Ti I t_Eu >> 7111_1 >> RIP 1-ER 2?C2>> s:ECTIt A 62 02 050 Print Version RCW 82.02.050 Impact fees --Intent-- Limitations. (1) It is the intent of the legislature: (a)To ensure that adequate facilities are available to serve new growth and development; (b) To promote orderly growth and development by establishing standards by which counties, cities, and towns may require, by ordinance, that new growth and development pay a proportionate share of the cost of new facilities needed to serve new growth and development; and (c)To ensure that impact fees are Imposed through established procedures and criteria so that specific developments do not pay arbitrary fees or duplicative fees for the same impact. (2) Counties, cities, and towns that are required or choose to plan under RCW 36 70A 040 are authorized to Impose impact fees on development activity as part of the financing for public facilities, provided that the financing for system improvements to serve new development must provide for a balance between impact fees and other sources of public funds and cannot rely solely on impact fees. (3)The impact fees: (a) Shall only be imposed for system improvements that are reasonably related to the new development; (b) Shall not exceed a proportionate share of the costs of system improvements that are reasonably related to the new development; and (c) Shall be used for system improvements that will reasonably benefit the new development. (4) Impact fees may be collected and spent only for the public facilities defined in RCW 82 02 090 which are addressed by a capital facilities plan element of a comprehensive land use plan adopted pursuant to the provisions of RCW 36 70A 070 or the provisions for comprehensive plan adoption contained In chapter 36 70, 35 63, or 35A 63 RCW.After the date a county, city, or town is required to adopt Its development regulations under chapter 36 70A RCW,continued authorization to collect and expend impact fees shall be contingent on the county, city, or town adopting or revising a comprehensive plan in compliance with RCW 36 70A.070, and on the capital facilities plan identifying: (a) Deficiencies in public facilities serving existing development and the means by which existing deficiencies will be eliminated within a reasonable period of time; (b) Additional demands placed on existing public facilities by new development;and (c)Additional public facility improvements required to serve new development Chapter 82.02.050 RCW - ; Washington State Legislature Page 2 of 2 If the capital facilities plan of the county, city, or town is complete other than for the inclusion of those elements which are the responsibility of a special district, the county, city, or town may impose impact fees to address those public facility needs for which the county, city, or town is responsible. (1994 c 257§24; 1993 sp s.c 6§6,19901st ex.s c 17§43.1 NOTES: Severability--1994 c 257: See note following RCW 36 70A 270. Effective date--1993 sp.s. c 6: See note following RCW 36.70A 040. Severability--Part, section headings not law--1990 1st ex.s. c 17: See RCW 36 70A 900 and 36 70A.901. SEPA: RCW 43.21C 065. i Title 12: Planning and Land Development - City Code - City of Kent, Washington Page 1 of 3 12.13.060 Submission of district capital facilities plan and data. A. On an annual basis, the district shall submit the following materials to the city council: 1. The district's capital facilities plan (as defined in KCC 12.13.010 herein) and adopted by the school board; 2. The district's enrollment projections over the next six (6) years, its current enrollment and the district's enrollment projections and actual enrollment from the previous year; 3. The district's standard of service; 4. The district's overall capacity over the next six (6) years, which shall take into account the available capacity from school facilities planned by the district but not yet built and be a function of the district's standard of service as measured by the number of students which can be housed in district facilities; S. An inventory of the district's existing facilities. B. To the extent that the district's standard of service identifies a deficiency in its existing facilities, the district's capital facilities plan must identify the sources of funding other than impact fees, for building or acquiring the necessary facilities to serve the existing student population in order to eliminate the deficiencies within a reasonable period of time. C. Facilities to meet future demand shall be designed to meet the adopted standard of service. If sufficient funding is not projected to be available to fully fund a capital facilities plan which meets the adopted standard of service, the district's capital facilities plan should document the reason for the funding gap, and identify all sources of funding that the district plans to use to meet the adopted standard of service. D. The district shall also submit an annual report to the city council showing the capital improvements which were serviced in whole or in part by the impact fees. E. In its development of the financing plan component of the capital facilities plan, the district shall plan on a six (6) year horizon and shall demonstrate its best efforts by taking the following steps: 1. Establish a six (6) year financing plan, and propose the necessary bond issues and levies required by and consistent with that plan and as-approved by the school board consistent with RCW 28A.53.020, 84.52.052 and 84.52.056 as amended; and 2. Apply to the state for funding, and comply with the state requirements for eligibility to the best of the district's ability. http://www.ci.kent.wa.us/CityCode/PlanningAndLandDevelopment.htm 9/9/2003 Title 12: Planning and Land Development - City Code - City of Kent, Washington Page 2 of 3 (Ord. No. 3260, § 1, 12-19-95) 12.13.070 Annual council review. On at least an annual basis, the city council shall review the information submitted by the district pursuant to KCC 12.13.060(A) herein. The review shall occur in conjunction with any update of the capital facilities plan element of the city's comprehensive plan. (Ord. No. 3260, § 1, 12-19-95) 12.13.080 Impact fee program elements. A. Impact fees will be assessed on every new dwelling unit in the district for which a fee schedule has been established. B. Impact fees will be imposed on a district by district basis, on behalf of any school district which provides to the city, a capital facilities plan, the district's standards of service for the various grade spans, estimates of the cost of providing needed facilities and other capital improvements, and the data from the district called for by the formula in KCC 12.13 140. Any impact fee imposed shall be reasonably related to the impact caused by the development, and shall not exceed a proportionate share of the cost of system improvements that are reasonably related to the development. The impact fee formula shall account in the fee calculation for future revenue the district will receive from the development. The ordnance adopting the fee schedule shall specify under what circumstances the fee may be adjusted in the interests of fairness. C. The impact fee shall be based on the capital facilities plan developed by the district and approved by the school board, and adopted by reference by the city as part of the capital facilities element of the comprehensive plan for the purpose of establishing the fee program. (Ord. No. 3260, § 1, 12-19-95) 12.13.090 Fee calculations. A. The fee shall be calculated based on the formula set out in KCC 12.13.140. B. Separate fees shall be calculated for single-family and multifamily types of dwelling units, and separate student generation rates must be determined by the district for each type of dwelling unit. For the purpose of this chapter, mobile homes shall be treated as single-family dwellings and duplexes shall be treated as multifamily dwellings. C. The fee shall be calculated on a district-wide basis using the appropriate factors and data to be supplied by the district, as indicated in KCC 12.13.140. The fee calculations shall also be made on a district-wide basis to assure maximum utilization of all school facilities in the district used currently or within the last two (2) years for instructional purposes. http://www.ci.kent.wa.us/CityCode/PlanningAndLandDevelopment.htm 9/9/2003 Title 12: Planning and Land Development - City Code - City of Kent, Washington Page 3 of 3 D. The formula in KCC 12.13.140 provides a credit for the anticipated tax contributions that would be made by the developments based on historical levels of voter support for bond issues in the district. E. The formula also provides for a credit for school facilities or sites actually provided by a developer which the district finds acceptable. F. The city may also impose an application fee to cover the reasonable costs of administration of the impact fee program. (Ord. No. 3260, § 1, 12-19-95) http://www.ci.kent.wa.us/CityCode/PlanningAndLandDevelopment.htm 9/9/2003 Title 12: Planning and Land Development - City Code - City of Kent, Washington Page 1 of 3 12.13.140 Formula for determining school impact fees. A. School impact fees shall be determined as follows: IF: A = Student factor for dwelling unit type and grade span x site cost per student for sites for facilities in that grade span = Full cost fee for site acquisition cost B = Student factor for dwelling unit type and grade span x school construction cost per student for facilities in that grade span x ratio of district's square footage of permanent facilities to total square footage of facilities = Full cost fee for school construction C = Student factor for dwelling unit type and grade span x relocatable facilities cost per student for facilities in that grade span x ratio of district's square footage of relocatable facilities to total square footage of facilities = Full cost fee for relocatable facilities D = Student factor for dwelling unit type and grade span "Boeckh Index" x SPI square ft per student factor x state match % = State match credit, and Al, 131, C1, D1 = A, B, C, D for elementary grade spans A2, B2, C2, D2 = A, B, C, D, for middle/junior high grade spans A3, B3, C3, D3 = A, B, C, D for high school grade spans TC = Tax payment credit = The net present value of the average assessed value in the district for unit type x current school district capital property tax levy rate, using a ten (10) year discount period and current interest rate (based on the bond buyer twenty (20) bond general obligation bond index) FC = Facilities credit = the per-dwelling-unit value of any site or facilities provided directly by the development Then the unfunded need = UN = Al + . . . + C3 (DI-D2-D3) - TC And the developer fee obligation = F = U/N2 And the net fee obligation = NF = F - FC B. Notes to formula. 1. Student factors are to be provided by the district based on district records of average actual student generation rates for new developments constructed over a period of not more than five (5) years prior to the date of the fee calculation; if such information is not available in the district, data from adjacent districts, districts http://www.ci.kent.wa.us/CityCode/PlanningAndLandDevelopment.htm 9/9/2003 Title 12: Planning and Land Development - City Code - City of Kent, Washington Page 2 of 3 with similar demographics, or countywide averages must be used. Student factors must be separately determined for single-family and multifamily dwelling units, and for grade spans. 2. The "Boeckh index" is a construction trade index of construction costs for various kinds of buildings; it is adjusted annually. 3. The district is to provide its own site and facilities standards and projected costs to be used in the formula, consistent with the requirements of this chapter. 4. The formula can be applied by using the following table: Table for Calculating School Impact Fee Obligations for Residential Dwelling Units (to be separately calculated for single-family and multifamily units) A1= Elementary school site cost per student x the student factor = A2= Middle/junior high site cost per student x the student factor = A3= High school site cost per student x the student factor = A= Al + A2 + A3 61= Elementary school construction cost per student x the student factor = B2= Middle/junior high construction cost per student x the student factor = B3= High school construction cost per student x the student factor = square footage of permanent facilities _ 6= (B1 + 62 + 63) x total square footage of facilities C1= Elementary school relocatable facility cost per student x the student factor = C2= Middle/junior high relocatable facility cost per student x the student factor = C3= High school relocatable facility cost per student x the student factor = square footage of permanent facilities C= (Cl + C2 + C3) x = total square footage of facilities Boeckh SPI square footage per student for state match student = D1= index x elementary school x % x factor D2= Boeckh x SPI square footage per student for x state x student = index middle/junior high school match % factor Boeckh SPI square footage per student for state match student — D3= index x high school x % x factor D= D1 + D2 + D3 = current school district capital property average assessed value tax levy rate where i+ the current TC= 1(1 + 1)10 x for the dwelling unit type x interest rate as stated in the bond = in the school district buy twenty (20) bond general obligation bond index FC= Value of site of facilities provided directly by the development number of dwelling units in development Total unfunded need = A + B + C - D = A http://www.ci.kent.wa.us/CityCode/PlanningAndLandDevelopment.htm 9/9/2003 Title 12: Planning and Land Development - City Code - City of Kent, Washington Page 3 of 3 +g +C -D Subtoti -TC Total unfunded need UN = divided by 2 = Developer fee obligation Less FC (if applicable) Net fee obligation (Ord. No. 3260, § 1, 12-19-95) http://www.ci.kent.wa.us/CityCode/PlanningAndLandDevelopment.htm 9/9/2003 �t � ��� ��� �� �„ _. � � � e �,� i I i : � yy 4 ��.R � �c.Q✓ N" ��p J .Y � �'4 {.. Is 4� /n i i ,; � .� �: �3 �b �qt} �y, a, r .7 ��� f 'i ',�. � d � �) °r3 e / f �� �� F � � � �$� � l t t.5 1v .3 ! 4 "c-N �._ �� — ��_. ����n�� L �. F. � K���l s-� ..' r c 7 r iw�,.y r r. � n- s -a�, � 3� � r+i _ e � ," � i _ ^� . • .• , • / i • r •r � 1 1 � / � I r 1 � r , I r r I r 1 •r r r i 1 `/ .,: II 11 MA $@MINIC1 12033 SE 256 h Street Kent, Washington 98030-6643 (253) 373-7295 SIX-YEAR CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2003-2004 - 2008-2009 April 2003 BOARD of DIRECTORS Bill Boyce Sandra Collins Scott Floyd Mike Jensen Linda Petersen ADMINISTRATION Barbara Grohe, Ph.D. - Superintendent Daniel L. Moberly- Assistant Superintendent- Business Services Fred H. High - Executive Director of Finance Mark Haddock, Ph.D. - Assistant Superintendent for Learning & School Improvement Margaret A Whitney - Assistant Superintendent of Human Resources & Special Services Carla Jackson - Executive Director, Kent-Meridian Strand Joseph McBrayer, Ph.D. - Executive Director, Kentlake Strand Merri Rieger- Executive Director, Kentridge Strand Janis McBrayer- Executive Director, Kentwood Strand Gary Plano - Executive Director of Instructional Services Valerie Lynch, Ed.D. - Executive Director of Special Services Donald Hall - Executive Director of Information Technology Kent School District six-Year capital Facilities Plan April 2003 ■ 10 lent School 01911CI (KEN7 SCHOOL� Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan 2003-2004 - 2008-2009 April 2003 0 For information on the Plan, please call the Finance & Planning Department at (253) 373-7295. Capital Facilities Plan Contributing Staff Gwenn Escher-Derdowski, Forecast & Planning Administrator Don Walkup & Helen Shindell-Butler, Transportation Department Larry Price, Director of Facilities& Construction Karla Wilkerson, Facilities Department Cover Design by Debbi Smith Maps by Jana Tucker Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2003 m C1 Six`Year Capital Facifities Plan 7a6Ce of Contents Section Page Number I Executive Summary 2 11 Six-Year Enrollment Projection 4 III Current District "Standard of Service" 8 I V Inventory and Capacity of Existing Schools 11 V Six-Year Planning and Construction Plan 14 VI Relocatable Classrooms 17 V I I Projected Classroom Capacity 18 V I I I Finance Plan, Cost Basis and Impact Fee Schedules 23 I X Summary of Changes to Previous Plan 30 X Appendixes 31 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2003 Page 1 I Executive Summary This Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") has been prepared by the Kent School District (the "District") as the organization's facilities planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act, King County Code K.C.C. 21A.43 and Cities of Kent, Covington, Auburn and Black Diamond. This annual plan update was prepared using data available in the spring of 2003 for the 2002-2003 school year. This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the Kent School District. This Plan is not intended to be the sole planning document for all of the District's needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic Long Range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board Policies, taking into account a longer or shorter time period, other factors and trends in the use of facilities, and other needs of the District as may be required. Prior Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent School District have been adopted by Metropolitan King County Council and Cities of Kent, Covington and Auburn and included in the Capital Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. The first ordinance implementing impact fees for the unincorporated areas was effective September 15, 1993. In order for impact fees to be collected in the unincorporated areas of Kent School District, the Metropolitan King County Council must adopt this Plan and a fee-implementing ordinance for the District. For impact fees to be collected in the incorporated portions of the District, the cities of Kent, Covington and Auburn must also adopt this Plan and their own school impact fee ordinances. This Plan has also been submitted to cities of Maple Valley, Black Diamond, SeaTac, and Renton. This Capital Facilities Plan establishes a "standard of service" in order to ascertain current and future capacity. While the State Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines do not account for the local program needs in the District. The Growth Management Act, King County and City codes and ordinances authorize the District to make adjustments to the standard of service based on specific needs of the District. This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. The District has identified schools with significant special needs programs as "impact" schools and the standard of service targets a lower class size at those facilities. Relocatables in the capacity calculation use the same standard of service as the permanent facilities. (continued) Kent School Distnct Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2003 Page 2 I Executive Summary (continued) > The capacity of each school in the District is calculated based on the District standard of service and the existing inventory, which includes some relocatable classrooms. The District's 2002-2003 program capacity of permanent facilities is 24,552 which reflects program changes and the reduction of class size to meet the requirements of Student Achievement Initiative 728. Relocatables provide additional transitional capacity until permanent facilities are completed. Kent School District is the fourth largest district in the state. Enrollment is reported monthly to the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI) on Form P223. Enrollment on October 1 is considered to be the enrollment for the year. P223 Headcount for October 1, 2002 was 26,378. P223 FTE (Full Time Equivalent) enrollment was 25,353.74. (FTE reports Kindergarten at .5 and excludes Early Childhood Education [ECE] and college-only Running Start students.) The actual number of individual students per the October 2002, full head count was 26,717. (Full Headcount reports all students at 1.0 Including Kindergarten, ECE and college-only Running Start students.) The District's standard of service, enrollment history and projections, and use of transitional facilities are reviewed in detail in various sections of this Plan. Our plan is to continue to satisfy concurrency requirements through the transitional use of relocatables. A financing plan is included in Section V I I I which demonstrates the District's ability to implement this Plan. Pursuant to the requirements of the Growth Management Act, this Plan will be updated annually with changes in the fee schedules adjusted accordingly. Kent School District six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Apni 2003 Page 3 I I Six -Year Enrollment Projection For capital facilities planning, growth projections are based on cohort survival and student yield from documented residential construction projected over the next six years. (see Table 2) The student generation factor, as defined on the next page, is the basis for the growth projections from new developments. King County births and the District's relational percentage average were used to determine the number of kindergartners entering the system. (see Table 1) 8.06% of 21,646 King County live births in 1998 is forecast for 1,790 students expected in Kindergarten for October 1, 2003. Together with proportional growth from new construction, 8.06% of King County births is equivalent to the number of students projected to enter kindergarten in the district for the next six-year period (see 7-aae2) Early Childhood Education students (sometimes identified by others as "Preschool Special Education [SE] or handicapped students") are calculated and reported separately on a .5 FTE basis. The first grade population is traditionally 7 - 8% larger than the kindergarten population due to growth and transfers to the District from private kindergartens. Cohort survival method uses historical enrollment data to forecast the number of students projected for the following year. Near term projections assume some growth from new developments to be offset by current local economic conditions. With a few notable exceptions, the expectation is that enrollment increases will occur District-wide in the long term. District projections are based on historical growth patterns combined with continuing development of projects in the pipeline dependent on market and growth conditions. The District will continue to track new development activity to determine impact to schools and monitor conditions to reflect adjustments in this assumption. The six-year enrollment projection anticipates moderate enrollment growth from new development currently in some phase of planning or construction in the district. Information on new residential developments and the completion of these proposed developments in all jurisdictions may be considered in the District's future analysis of growth projections. Within practical limits, the District has kept abreast of proposed developments. The Kent School District serves seven permitting jurisdictions: unincorporated King County, the cities of Kent, Covington, and Auburn and a small portion of the city of Maple Valley. The west Lake Sawyer area has been annexed to the City of Black Diamond and Kent Mountain View Academy is located in the small portion of the City of SeaTac served by Kent School District. (Continued) Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2003 Page 4 I I Six -Year Enrollment Projection (Continued) STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR "Student Factor' is defined by King County code as "the number derived by a school district to describe how many students of each grade span are expected to be generated by a dwelling unit" based on district records of average actual student generated rates for developments completed within the last five years. Following these guidelines, the student generation factor for Kent School District is as follows: Single Family Elementary .466 Junior High .227 Senior High .200 Total .893 Multi-Family Elementary .281 Junior High .105 Senior High .068 Total .454 The student generation factor is based on a survey of 4,485 single family dwelling units and 2,701 multi-family dwelling units with no adjustment for occupancy. Please refer to Appendix E on Pages 35-36 for details of the Student Generation Factor survey. The actual number of students in those residential developments was determined using the District's Education Logistics (EDULOG) Transportation System. In 4,485 single family dwelling units there were 2,088 elementary students, 1,017 junior high students, and 898 senior high students for a total of 4,003 students. In 2,701 multi-family dwelling units, there were 759 elementary students, 284 junior high students, and 183 senior high students, for a total of 1,226 students. Kent School Distnct Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2003 Page 5 (V c M NCO Y7 CO (n r O T V 0) M (n W N M (n 0 V 000 n C) Cl) N h t7 � � (O (C C m m O O r r M O V O CO V_ O N m N r r r N N N N N N N N r r N t0 $ pl N v a m N m x 0 IMf p r, M 1D O CO O r M N V V M O Cl) 10 < O M 0 CO r O N O V (O M M tO LO N C O O O O r r N r r N O m a (A �- N V O N r CI r N N N N N N N N N r r N O II a N N O _ C CC} m m Q O 7 n \ CI (n (O (O r to CD M co M O N O rn m w r C O CO r (A CO (n Cn O M CDr n M M Q N cr) O O O O N O N O N r P V a U (� N N N N N N N N N N N N r r N to CC c co W C C CD 0W p Of O r N (.- O r In N In N n (OD U d' O co NV O n r N Cl) r 00 O V CO M O m < m W O) O r N O r O O r O 1� 1f) m jC r N 07 r N N N N N N N N N r �- N 1O 4 m L m N W co 177 \ N O OD N co N M O M sOff N co N LU (M p- N tO O O q0 Or O O m m m m (D c N Cc) .O N O O N m E N 04 O N N N N N N N r r r r r N L O C CO N O C y C ti = r W N V 00 M to N (O NCD C) (n N M Co M M n (M O mco 1` O O O 0 1, In Lq cc Or 00) N V) N N N N N N N r r r rrr N 0 C V C ~ Y c t U Z W N o N O (n (O 00 v m 1- M r r LO N y p _ c O r (n 1- N (O CO N p) N W 1n CO CO O) p) n U �• cc 0�1 r p) O m m m CD p) m co W v Cl)r cc Ip e7 c C J r' 00 N r N r r r r r N V O m m V J N v d O $ �/ _ 10 m r (n r LO N V LC) (n 0 M O M Z d V O O r N O) 04 N V O) (O O N h C W O) r U-jco rn O C) O m Go m p) co n co v ('' LC, m 10 Y O M 06 W r N r N r r r r r r r r N V p( V m W N O o ~ v r o N n. 1, O N O O (O N O O O) M (() a LL Q) n (O M O V O r V O O O N O O n O N 7 V C) c3 (3 O (3 O m p) CO m (D (n M ((7 W = o VM N r r r r r r r r r r r r N (") Y G O F- N ?, x Z a (+) o co In dM 00 N O 1, (n C) o 00 P o c 2 � V P.- M O n r (m O) Cl) o C i Y ' 0 o p a a p r r` (c n CC! to OD E0) oO (n o n N N r r r pW N p IL W C p W N O m II N o m O O co p) O O Q) N O N O w N CO (O O T C) O p m n0 m m Go co rl Co In c n NoV C N N a) (� C N N N m W m y 9 x c C p o N9 V O 0 0M O co C, O LO � co V tm.. c t LL a V V CO r (O M N N r CO O (f) n C) H 0In O m m CO C) W n n to co � V N C' O p V L a8 m OI r r r r r r r r r r r r N r N V U c m O M C_ m C Y M N LL C W II 3 O 00 o O N M V M N 01 V (n M DD O N O Q rn m .a CO p) LO n. N C) O N N V CO to CO O (O (O c t m 0) n CD P CO n n m CO (n V V M N m rn C p U e" O �-- r r r r '- r r r r r r N a X W > _> N y } L U O = X C ry N m N Cl) X N a' o s 0 c a m N c o c m c E o 0 ul m 4)) E ma E o N o LN N M R N (O I-- CO CA O 2tOi v C O W C m M C m c NO 21 (A d v v v v v v v v 'v 'v v v }g > 5 W e N O m u a v C C`O (`0 N N T N N N @ C`0 l`6 (` O ? LL F IL Y Y Y Y C7 0 CD 0 0 C9 CD CD o o o CD ~ } U r N n KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.415 SIX-YEAR F.T.E. ENROLLMENT PROJECTION AG2uAi' I P R 0 J £ C T I O N October 20021 2003 _1 2004 1 2005 2006 2007 H 2008 King County Live Births ' 21,646 22,212 22,007 22,487 21,778 21,870 21,950 ' Increase/Decrease 73 566 -205 480 -709 92 80 Kindergarten/Birth % 2 8 06% 8.06% 8 06% a 06% 8 06% 8 06% 8 06% 2 Early Childhood Education @ 5 68 70 78 87 97 108 120 20 Kindergarten FTE @ .5 873 895 913 932 923 931 939 Grade 1 1,922 1,824 1,893 1,931 1,989 1,975 1,996 Grade 2 1,936 1,917 1,839 1,908 1,964 2,027 2,017 Grade 3 2,055 1,947 1,949 1,871 1,959 2,020 2,087 Grade 4 2,068 2,064 1,983 1,985 1,925 2,019 2,084 Grade 5 2,149 2,042 2,092 2,011 2,032 1,977 2,075 Grade 6 2,151 2,191 2,097 2,147 2,084 2,110 2,059 Grade 7 2,380 2,272 2,315 2,232 2,290 2,229 2,261 Grade 8 2,079 2,317 2,246 2,304 2,227 2,290 2,234 Grade 9 5 2,404 2,320 Grade 9 5 2,607 2,544 2,614 2,533 2,608 Grade 10 2,039 2,163 2,122 2,401 2,349 2,417 2,348 Grade 11 1,823 1,820 1,959 1,940 2,197 2,155 2,220 Grade 12 1,475 1,496 1,542 1,677 1,666 1,888 1,857 Total FTE Enrollment 25,422 25,338 25,635 25,970 26,316 26,679 26,905 Noce 213 Yearly Increase 21 -84 297 335 346 363 226 Yearly Increase % 0 08% -0 33% 1.17% 1.31% 1 33% 1.38% 0.85% Cumulative Increase 21 -63 234 569 915 1,278 1,504 [Full E uvalent(FTE) 25,422 1 25,338 25,635 25,970 26,316 1 26,679 26,905 Kindergarten projection based on King County actual live birth percentage and proportional growth from new construction 2 Kindergarten FTE enrollment projection at 5 is calculated by using the DistncVs percentage of King County live births 5 years earlier compared to actual kindergarten enrollment in the previous year (Includes ECE @ 5-Early Childhood Ed) 3 Kindergarten projection is at 5 FTE although many schools have Full Day Kindergarten at 10 FTE with alternative funding 4 Oct 2002 P223 Headcount is 26,378 Full student headcount including 136 Preschool 8 377 Running Start=26,717 5 Grade level reconfiguration In 2004,W grade moves to the senior high schools G R O W T H P R O J E C T I O N S - Adjustments for current economic factors For facilities planning purposes,this six-year enrollment protection anticipates moderate enrollment growth from new development currently in some phase of planning or construction in the district. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 2 April 2003 Page 7 Mission Federal Way Public Schools is obligated to educate all students in academic knowledge, skills, abilities and responsible behavior to ' be successful, contributing members of a free society. Vision: Every Student a Reader * All 3'd graders reading at grade level by 2004 ' * All 10"graders reading at grade level by 2006. * *90%ofALL students reading at grade level by 2009 ' Federal Way Public Schools 3140518"Avenue S ' Federal Way, Washington 98003-5433 (253) 945-2000 ' This document is published by the ' Business Services Department of the Federal Way Public Schools. June 2003 ' ` Federal Way Public Schools Every Student,a Reader ' ' FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2003/04 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN IMPACT FEE CALCULATION CHANGES FROM 2002/03 TO 2003/04 IIaACT FEE ' Item From/To Comment Percent of Permanent Facilities 96.12 to Report#3 OSPI ' 96.41% Percent Temporary Facilities 3.88% to 3.59% Updated portable inventory Temporary Facility Cost $79695. to No Change to cost of most recently ' $795695. purchased portables Boeck Cost/Sq. Ft $110.32 to Change per OSPI ' $114.88 ` State Match 60.91% to No Change per OSPI website 60.91% ' Average Assessed Value SFR— Per Puget Sound Educational Service $188,430 to District (ESD 121) $203,630 MFR— $48,281 to $51,340 Capital Bond Interest Rate 5.19% to Market Rate 4.69% ' Property Tax Levy Rate $1.32to King County Treasury Division $1.46 30 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2003/04 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN INIPACT FEE CALCULATION CHANGES FROM 2002/03 TO 2003104 I ' STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS Student Generation factors are based on rates for new developments constructed over a period of not more than five years prior to the date of the fee calculation. The changes in ' student Generation factors between the 2002/03 Capital Facilities Plan and the 2003/04 Capital Facilities Plan are due to developments that were deleted or added based upon the age of the developments. The Student Generation worksheet is found on page 25. SITE ACQUISITION COSTS ' The negotiated purchase price for the Todd Beamer High School site was $80,000 per acre. This is the base line cost for acreage. The assessed valuation for the Federal Way Public Academy land was $521,000 at the time of purchase. The calculated cost per acre in the impact fee calculation is a weighted calculation using the L $80,000 per acre for Todd Beamer and the assessed valuation at the time of purchase for the Federal Way Public Academy. Federal Way Public Academy is a 3-acre site. The grade span for this facility is grades 6-10. Middle school accounts for 60% of the cost; senior high is 40%. Todd Beamer- 40 x $80,000. = $3,200,000. ' FWPA $ 208,600 (40% of$521,500, 12 acres of 3 acre parcel) Total Cost $3,408,600 ' Cost/Acreage $3,408,600/41.2 =$82,733 Cost per acre for High School ' Middle School: 20 x $80,000 = $1,600,000 FWPA $ 312,900 (1.8 acres of 3 acre parcel) Total Cost $1,912,900 ' Cost/Acreage $1,912,900/21 8 =$87,747 cost per acre SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION COSTS Todd Beamer construction costs is $46,350,000. The costs for the new middle school are set ' at$15,400,000. The cost for Federal Way Public Academy (exclusive of land)is $4,478,517. The Federal Way Public Academy costs are split 60% to middle school and 40% to senior high in the impact fee calculation. All new seats provided in these projects are reflected in the impact fee calculation. 29 ' FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2003/04 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION III- SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION CAPACITY Elementary school capacity reflects program changes for the 2003/04 school year. Middle School capacity changes reflect the transition from Junior High to Middle School and Board ' adopted program changes for the middle school program. The average capacity of senior high schools is increased from 1414 to 1526. This change is a result of analysis of current building use and programs in place for the 2003/04 school year, the addition of Todd Beamer High School and replacement of Harry S. Truman High School. Building Program Capacities are found on page 13. PORTABLES The list of portables reflects the movement of portables between facilities or new portables purchased. Portable Locations can be found on page 15. STUDENT FORECAST The Student Forecast now covers 2003 through 2008. The new forecast reflects a decline in enrollment for the next two school years. Enrollment history and projections are found on page 18. ' CAPACITY SUMMARY The changes in the Capacity Summary are a reflection of the changes in the capacities and ' student forecast. New schools and increased capacity at current buildings are shown as increases to capacity. Capacity Summaries are found on pages 20-23. IMPACT FEE CALCULATION - KING COUNTY CODE 21A The Impact Fee Calculations have changed due to changes in several factors. The adjustment made in the Impact Fee Calculation, causing a change to the Impact Fee between the 2002/03 Capital Facilities Plan and the 2003/04 Capital Facilities Plan can be found on page 29. 1 28 t FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2003/04 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 4 ' SUMMARY OF CHANGES FROM THE 20D2/03 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN The 2003/04 Capital Facilities Plan is an updated document, based on the 2002/03 Capital Facilities Plan. The changes between the 2002/03 Plan and the 2003/04 Plan are listed below. SECTION I-THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN NEEDS FORECAST-NEW FACILITIES Federal Way Public Academy and Todd Beamer High School are removed from the needs forecast. These facilities will be operational in September 2003. SIX-YEAR FINANCE PLAN The Six Year Finance Plan has been rolled forward to reflect 2003/2008 27 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2003104 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN ' IMPACT FEE ' School Site Acquisition Cost: Student Student Facility Cost/ Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Acreage Acre Capacity SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary 0 00 $0 436 0 2520 0]190 $0 $0 __.._..... _ .. _ ._..__ ...._....._ __.......__........_. ._..._.....__. _1.9 Middle School 21 80 $87,747 702 0 1602 0 0510 $437 $139 Sr High 4120 $82,733 1,497 0 I766 0 0420 $402 $96 TOTAL $839 $235 ' School Construction Cost: Student Student %Perm Fac./ Facility Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ ' Total Sq Ft Cost Capacity SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary _96 41 ok $0 436 0 2520 0 1190 $0 $0 MiddleSchoot 964]% $18,355,821 702 01602 00510 $4,039 $1,286 ' Sr High 96 41% $47,872,696 1,497 0 1766 00420 $5,445 $1,295 TOTAL $9,483 $2,581 ' Temporary Facility Cost: Student Student %Temp Fac. Facility Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Total Sq Ft Cost Size SFR MFR SFR MFR ' Element 3 59%a $0 25 0 2595 0 1]90 $0 $0 Middle School 3 59% $79,695 49 0 1603 0 0510 $9 1 $3 Sr High 3 59% $79,695 46 01756 00420 $11 1 $3 TOTAL $20 $6 ' State Matching Credit Calculation: Student Student Boeck Cost/ Sq Ft State Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Sq Ft Student Match SFR MFR SFR MFR ' Elementary $114 88 $0 0 00°Ia 0 2595 0 1190 $0 $0 Middle School $114 88 1 IO 0 00% 0 1603 00510 $0 $0 New Sr High $11488 120 6091% 01756 00420 $1,474 $353 Total $1,474 $353 ' Tax Payment Credit Calculation SFR MFR Average Assessed Value (April 2003) $203,630 $51,340 Capital Bond Interest Rate(May 2003) _ 4 69% W^4 69% Net Present Value of Average Dwelling $1:596:320 $402:470� Years Amortized 10 10 Property Tax Levy Rate $1 46 $1 46 ' Present Value of Revenue Stream $2,331 $588 Single Family Multi-Family Residences Residences ' Mitigation Fee Summary Site Acquisition Cost $ 839 $ 235 Permanent Facility Cost $ 9,483 $ 2,581 Temporary Facility Cost $ 20 $ 6 State Match Credit $ (1,474) $ (353) Tax Payment Credit $ (2,331) $ (588) Sub-Total $ 6,537 $ 1,880 ' 50%Local Share $ 3,269 $ 940 Impact Fee $ 3,269 $ 940 26 c p m m o CO m r m a o M o m mMovvr In M al F � a � mINltvwmwa anon vi tm« = d O co m M N 0 , +T- m N N fD i •O V r r T m t N T O V 0 A 0 7 0 0 0 N N O M � N LL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 O ' O V C `• m r M ro '- r- m 0 N N O PO') N f00 rV- ON1 Imn .- r V � ID O W N � V O W O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C V ' r m C m w r M 0 r M m r Y'7 O m O N 0 to �D Q1 r 7 m VN 10 LO f1 V 0 V It O N � N N O V O N yN {L 0000000000 G F" O O O O G ' a w w IV ""'Ic"lLnio"I o L or m E - S C L — In N r a a D y M u1 r r in M T m (n o o 0 o o Lj E E too 00 c w Ell ce 0 0 „ c O W C. a. O C L. U N V r '- d (' a d -00 O1 m N m O m M m M N co 0 00 0 o aa. ., E9 C7 000000 M W z 10 N w z QO 0O0 = N : ° W a ° „m c ,�' 10 �nMmaoo, u � Cl) d m = mrInIn .� NZ E aM , m � � r ; C\j .aN M [0 EO N OO +� U O a E E m w E o o 0 o 0 O en z W y W r a z ea 3 o E CY c t y ' e a �i = 0 0 o v o 0 0 0 0 0 0Lo w = 3 3 m W Z G a�cr d CID m a W Y J Z Q - � a 3 Z C� y 1 G F N O Z m « ' W m aw 45 >_ '�° -?5v a m wL ao1Oma � ZY ~ o c v m O ' o = a a) a m m m m d > c O mto N O pO N C) 05 :f S > DU' S (bro 0 0 0 1010 o m rn rn m FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2003/04 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN King County, the City of Federal Way, and the City of Kent Impact Fee Calculations Single and Multi-Family Residences Each jurisdiction that imposes school impact fees requires that developers pay these fees to help cover a share of the impact of new housing developments on school facilities. ' To determine an equitable fee throughout unincorporated King County, a formula was established. This formula can be found in King County Code 21A and was substantially ' adopted by the City of Federal Way and Kent. The formula requires the Distnct to establish a "Student Generation Factor" which estimates how many students will be added to a school district by each new single or multi-family unit and to gather some standard construction costs, which are unique to that district. - STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR ANALYSIS Federal Way Public Schools student generation factor was determined separately for single- family units and multi-family units. The factors used in the 2003/04 Capital Facilities Plan ' were derived using actual generation factors from single farruly units and multi-family units, which were constructed in the last five (5) years. - EVIPACT FEE CALCULATION 1 ' Following the calculations for the student generation factor is a copy of the Impact Fee Calculation for single family and multi-family units based on King County Code 21A and the Growth Management Act. ➢ Temporary Facility Cost is the average cost of a portable purchased within the last 12 months. ➢ Site Acquisition Costs is the per acre cost of the last school site purchased (site 45); this ' is a negotiated purchase price. Plan Year 2003/04 Plan Year 2002103 Collection Year 2004 Collection Year 2003 i Single Family Units $3,269. $3,894. I�t Multi-Family Units $ 940. 1,094. 24 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2003/04 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Actual - - Projected-- CAPACITY 2002 z 2WI 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 BUILDING PROGRAM 9 CAPACITY 4,430 0 4,900 6,397 6,397 6,397 6,397 6,397 A Add or subtract changes in capacity f] 1 Truman Remodel ' 2 Add Capacity to Three High Schools 372 3 Federal Way Public Academy 133 4 Todd Beamer High School 1,364 ' Adjusted Program Capacity 4,900 6,397 6,397 6,397 6,397 6,397 6,397 ' ENROLLMENT Basic FTE Enrollment 4,405 6,050 6,166 6,308 6,430 6,513 6,512 5 Internet Academy(AAFfE) 164 164 164 I64 164 164 164 ' Basic Ed without Internet Academy 4,241 5,886 6,002 6,144 6,266 6,349 6,348 SURPLUS OR(UNIIOUSED) tPROGRAM CAPACITY —7659 Sll 395 253 131 48 49 RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 6 Current Portable Capacity 302 116 179 179 179 179 179 AddlSubtract portable capacity 7. Add new portable capacity 47 8 Deduct Portable Capacity (186) 9 Add new portable for Merit(at Thomas Jefferson) 16 ' Adjusted Portable Capacity 116 179 179 179 179 179 179 SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) E:PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 775 690 574 432 310 227 228 NOTES: 1. Truman High School modernization and expansion 2. Add capacity to three existing high schools 3 Federal Way Public Academy-Grades 9 and 10 4 Add Todd Beamer High School 5 Internet Academystudents are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities. ' 6 Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available This is a calculated number only The actual number of portables that will be used will be based upon actual population needs 7 Add portable capacity to Decatur and Thomas Jefferson ' 8. Portables at Truman and Merit were demolished. 9 Add two portable classrooms for Merit at Thomas Jefferson(program cap is 16) 23 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2003104 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN ' CAPACITY SUMMARY-MIDDLE SCHOOLS Actual 1 Projected - - CAPACITY 2002 Z 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 BUILDING PROGRAM 4 CAPACITY 4,222 a 4,222 4,434 4,434 4,924 4,924 4,924 ' CL A n 0 1 Federal Way Public Academy 212 2 New Middle School 490 a 0 0 ' Adjusted Program Capacity 4,222 i 4,434 4,434 4,924 4,924 4,924 4,924 ENROLLMENT E3Basic FTEEnrollment 5,448 5,492 5,466 5,434 5,305 5,230 5,240 Internet Academy (AAFTE) 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Basic FTE Enrollment without Internet Academy 5,356 5,400 5,374 5,342 5,213 5,138 5,148 ' SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) PROGRAM CAPACITX 1 (1,134) 1 (966) 1 (940) 1 (418) 1 (289) 1 (214) 1 (2241 ' RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 4 Current Portable Capacity 808 685 783 881 881 881 881 ' Add/Subtract portable capacity 5 Add new portable capacity 49 98 98 6 Federal Way Pubhc Academy Portables (172) ' Adjusted Portable Capacity 685 783 1 881 881 881 881 881 SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE 7 CAPACITY (449) (183) 1 (59) 463 592 667 657 ' NOTES: 1 Federal Way Public Academy Grades 6, 7 and 8 2. New Middle School to Open ' 3 Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full tune use of school facibbes. 4 Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily ' house students until permanent facilities are available. This is a calculated number only The actual number of portables that will be used will be based upon actual population needs ' S. Add portable capacity to Sacajawea and Kilo Middle School 6 Federal Way Pubic Academy portable removed from instructional use 7 Capacity for unhoused students will be accomodated with travelling teachers and no planning time in some classrooms 1 22 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2003104 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARY-ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS Actual z -- Projected-- ICAPACITY 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY 9,802 0 9,802 9,776 9,750 9,724 9,698 9,698 m f� 0 ] Special Education Changes v (26) (26) (26) (26) o` ' Adjusted Program Capacity 9,802 9,776 9,750 9,724 9,698 9,698 9,698 ENROLLMENT EBa,,i,,cFTEEnrollment 11,202 9,143 9,106 9,115 9,197 9,438 9,627 net Academy(AAFTE) 32 32J 32 32 32 32 32 FTE Enrollment without Internet Academy 1I,170 1 9,111 9,074 9,083 9,165 9,406 9,595 SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) PROGRAM CAPACITY 1 (1,368) 1 665 1 676 1 641 1 533 1 292 103 ' RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 3 Current Portable Capacity 1,450 1,450 1,450 1,450 1,450 1,450 1,450 Add/Subtract portable capacity Adjusted Portable Capacity 1,450 1,450 7,450 1,450 1,450 1,450 1,450 SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABL=82 CAPACITY 2,115 2,126 2,091 1 1,983J 1,742 1,553 NOTES: ' 1. Add Programs 2 ECEAP, 1 SBD(Severely Behavioral Disordered)and 1 Pre-School Program This reduces Basic Education capacity in the school years indicated 2 Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities 3 Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and ' other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available. This is a calculated number only The actual number of portables that will be used will be based upon actual population needs. 21 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2003/04 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN ' CAPACITY SUMMARY•ALL GRADES Actual - Projected-- CAPACITY 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2,008 BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY 18,842 19,312 20,995 20,969 21,433 21,407 21,407 ' Add or subtract changes to capacity eD ' Special Education Changes n (26) (26) (26) (26) Truman High modernization and expansion 98 0 Increase Capacity at Three Htgh Schools 372 11 ' New Middle School 490 Federal Way Public Academy 345 Todd Beamer Mgh School p 1,364 Adjusted Program Capacity 19,3121 120,995 20,96 221,433 121,407 121,407 21,407 ' ENROLLMENT Basic FTE Enrollment 21,055 20,685 20,738 20,857 20,932 21,181 21,379 Internet Academy Enrollment (AAFTE) 288 288 288 288 288 288 288 ' Basic FTE Enrollment without Internet Academy 20,767 120,397 20,450 20,569 120,644 20,893 21,091 SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) PROGRAM CAPACITY (1,455) 598 519 864 763 514 316 RELOCATABLE CAPACITY Current Portable Capacity 2,462 2,325 2,486 2,584 2,584 2,584 2,462 Add/Subtract Portable Capacity ' Add New Portable Capaclty 49 161 98 Deduct Portable Capacity (186) Adjusted Portable Capacity 2,325 2,486 2,584 2,584 2,584 2,584 2,462 ' SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 870 3,084 1 3,103 3,448 3,34 33,098 2,778 20 1 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2003/04 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Capacity Summaries NAll Grades, Elementary, Middle School, and Senior High Schools M The Capacity Summanes combine Building Capacity information and the Student Forecast information. The result demonstrates the requirements for new or remodeled facilities and why there is a need for the District to use temporary facilities or interim measures. ' The information is organized in spreadsheet format, with a page summanzing the entire District, and then evaluating capacity vs. number of students at elementary, rrnddle school, ' and senior high levels individually. The notes at the bottom of each spreadsheet provide information about what facilities are in place each year. 19 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2003/04 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Full Time Equivalent Enrollment History and Projections Simplified FTE(K Headcount= 5 FTE,Junior High FTE=989 Headcount,Senior High FIE= 933Headcount) Total K-12 Percent School Year Elementary Junior nigh Senior High FTE Change ' 1996-97 10,863 4,930 3,913 19,706 1997-98 11,123 5,073 4,082 20,278 2 8% 1998-99 11,480 5,080 4,120 20,680 19% ' 1999-00 11,622 5,110 4,348 21,079 19% 2000-01 11,640 5,300 4,390 21,330 12% 2001-02 11,498 5,331 4,415 21,244 -0.4% 2002-03 11,202 5,448 4,405 21,055 -0 9% * P2003-04 9,143 5,492 6,050 20,685 -1.8% P2004-05 9,106 5,466 6,166 20,738 0.3% P2005-06 9,115 5,434 6,308 20,857 0.6% P2006-07 9,197 5,305 6,430 20,932 0.4% P2007-08 9,438 5,230 6,513 21,181 1.2% P2008-09 9,627 5,240 6,511 21,379 0.9% *New Configuration Elementary K-5 Middle School 6-8 High School 9-12 Enrollment History and Six Year Forecast ' a oq° 22,000 30% 21,000 ' 20,000 2 0% r C � 19,000 ` � x• u z }� 0.0% c 18,000 a O ti 1Y 1 0°k 17,000 1 -2 0% 16,000 t 3 0% 15,000 'D 'tD a� � a$a '$� a� a$s g� Aa°o a$ ion 'sue Dy by bi ba b0 b6 'lipSchool Year 3FTE -0 PercentofChange M 18 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2003104 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN ' Federal Way expects little or no growth. The long-range forecast provided with this report used a model with cohort survival rates and growth rates based on projected changes in the 5- 19 age group for King County. Most of the methods used for long range enrollment reporting assume that enrollment is a constant percent of something else (e.g. population) or that enrollment will mirror some projected trend for the school-age population over time. The report included 5 different calculations to provide a range of possible projections for the District to the year 2015. This model produces a projection that is between 24,000 and 26,000 when applied to the low, medium and high range modes. This provides a reasonable range for long-range planning and is consistent with estimates from various models. ' Short-term budget projections may be more conservative than the standard grade progression model. For the 2003/04 school year, the district chose the Enrollment Master' projection using standard grade progression model complemented by the work from the contracted ' report. Standard grade progression is a reasonably accurate method for the near term future when the near future looks much like the near past. Long-range projections that establish the need for facilities are a modification of the cohort survival method. The cohort method of analysis becomes less reliable the farther out the projections are made. The Federal Way School District long-range projections are studied ' annually. The study includes information from the jurisdictional demographers as they project future housing and population in the region. The long-range projections used by Federal Way Public Schools reflect a similar age trend in student populations as the projections published by the Office of Financial Management for the State of Washington. Growth Management requires jurisdictions to plan for a minimum of twenty years. The Federal Way School District is a partner in this planning with the various jurisdictions comprising the school district geography. These projections create a vision of the school district in the future. 1 1 1 1 1 17 M FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2003/04 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Student Forecast Student enrollment projections are a basic component of budget development. Enrollment projections influence many of the financial estimates that go into budget preparation. The majority of staffing requirements are derived directly from the forecasted number of students. Allocations for instructional supplies and materials are also made on the basis of projected enrollment. Other expenditures and certain revenue projections are directly related to enrollment projections. Enrollment projections are completed annually in the Business Services Department. Projections must be detailed at various levels, district total, school-building totals, grade level and program level to include vocational and special education students. ' The basis of projections has been cohort survival analysis. Cohort survival is the analysis of a group that has a common statistical value (grade level) as it progresses through time. In a ' stable population the cohort would be 1.00 for all grades. This analysis uses historical information to develop averages and project the averages forward. This method does not trace individual students; it is concerned with aggregate numbers in each grade level. The district has used this method with varying years of history and weighted factors to study several projections. Because transfers in and out of the school system are common, student migration is factored into the analysis as it increases or decreases survival rates. Entry grades (kindergarten) are a unique problem in cohort analysis. The district collects information on birth rates within the district's census tracts, and treats these statistics as a cohort for kindergarten enrollment in the appropriate years. The Federal Way School District is using various statistical methods for projecting student enrollments. The resultant forecasted enrollments are evaluated below. The first method is a statistical cohort analysis that produces ten distinct forecasts. These are forecast of enrollment for one year. The projections vary depending on the number of years of historical information and how they are weighted. A second method is a projection using an enrollment projection software package that allows the user to project independently at school or grade level and to aggregate these projections for the district level. The Enrollment Master software provides statistical methods including trend line, standard grade progression (cohort) and combinations of these methods. This software produces a five-year projection of school enrollment. In November of 2001, the District contracted a demographer to develop projections for the Federal Way School District. The report was complete in January 2002. The model used to forecast next year's enrollment uses cohort survival rates to measure grade to grade growth, assumes market share losses to private schools (consistent with county-wide average), assumes growth from new housing or losses due to net losses from migration. This forecast was provided as a range of three projections. The report substantiated that for next year, 16 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2003104 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PORTABLE LOCATIONS PORTABLESLOCATED PORTABLES LOCATED AT ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS AT SENIOR HIGHS NON NON INSTRUCTIONAL INSTRUCTIONAL INSTRUCTIONAL INSTRUCTIONAL Adelaide 3 Decatur 5 Bri adoon 1 Federal Way 1 Camelot 1 Thomas Jefferson 1 Enterprise 3 Meat 2 Green Gables 1 Lake Dolloff 2 TOTAL 9 Lake Grove 2 ' Lakeland 2 Mark Twain 3 Meredith Hill 3 PORTABLES LOCATED ' Mirror Lake 4 AT SUPPORT FACILITIES Nautilus 1 Olympic View 2 MOT 1 Panther Lake 3 Rainier View 3 TOTAL 1 Sherwood Forest 4 Silver Lake 4 Star Lake 4 Sunn crest 1 1 HEAD START PORTABLES AT DISTRICT SITES Twin Lakes 2 1 Valhalla 2 Wtldwood 4 Mirror Lake 1 Woodmont 3 Sherwood Forest 1 ' TOTAL 58 2 Total 2 PORTABLES LOCATED AT MIDDLE SCHOOLS NON INSTRUCTIONAL INSTRUCTIONAL Portables at Illahee site 1 9 Illahee 3 Kilo 8 Lakota 3 ' Saca'awea 4 Sa hahe 4 Totem 5 TOTAL 28 9 15 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2003/04 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Portable Locations The Washington State Constitution requires the State to provide each student a basic education. It is not efficient use of District resources to build a school with a capacity for 500 students due to lack of space for 25 students when enrollment fluctuates throughout the year and from year to year. Portables are used as temporary facilities or interim measures to house students until permanent facilities can be built or boundary adjustments can be made. When permanent facilities become available, the portable(s) is either used for other purposes such as storage or child care programs, or moved to another school for an interim classroom. Some portables ' may not be fit to move due to age or physical condition. In these cases, the District may choose to buy new portables and surplus these unfit portables. It is the practice and philosophy of Federal Way Public Schools that portables are not acceptable as permanent facilities. The following page provides a list of the location of the portable facilities, used for temporary educational facilities by Federal Way Public Schools. 14 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2003/04 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN r BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITIES r ELEMENTARY BUILDING MIDDLE SCHOOL BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY PROGRAM CAPACITY Adelaide 416 lllahee 737 Bn adoon 462 Kilo 762 Camelot 332 Lakota 654 Enterprise 380 Saca'awea 740 Green Gables 432 Sa hahe 680 Lake Dolloff 475 Totem 649 Lake Grove 430 Federal Way Public Academy 212 Lakeland 422 12002 TOTAL 1 4,434 Mark Twain 475 Meredith Hill 417 *Middle School Average 739 Mirror Lake 372 ' Nautilus 460 SENIOR HIGH BUILDING Olympic View 409 PROGRAM CAPACITY Panther Lake 384 Rainier View 417 Decatur 1,476 Sherwood Forest 462 Federal Way 1,588 Silver Lake 487 Thomas Jefferson 1,544 Star Lake 475 Todd Beamer 1,364 Sunn crest 409 Federal Way Public Academy 133 Twin Lakes 447 2002 TOTAL 6,105 Valhalla 437 Wildwood 442 *Senior High Average 1,526 Woodmont 360 ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL BUILDING 2002 TOTAL 9,802 PROGRAM CAPACITY Merit School 1 Elementary Average 426 Truman High School 292 2002 TOTAL 308 ' Notes: Elementary program capacities are based on the number of teaching stations in the building,contracted class size,and special use classrooms in place during the 02103 school year. All available instructional space is calculated. Secondary program capacities are based on peak loading. ' The calculation is based on 25 students per available teaching stations Capacity changes at Middle School reflect a change in instructional delivery for 6th and ' 7th grade students. * Federal Way Public Academy capacity is not used in the calculated average 13 1 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2003104 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Building Capacities This Capital Facilities Plan establishes the District's "standard of service" in order to ascertain the District's current and future capacity. The Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, but these guidelines do not take into consideration the education program needs. The District has identified a Building Program Capacity for each of the schools to the District. This Full Time Equivalent (FTE) capacity is based on: • The number of classrooms available in each school • Any special requirements at each school • The contracted class load by grade level In general, the District's current standard provides that the average class size for a standard classroom for grade K through grade 2 is 20 students , for grades 3-5 is 25 students and grades 6-8 is 25 students and 9-12 is 26 students. Gate (Gifted and Talented Education) classrooms are 25 students, and special education classrooms are 12 students. This size is detemmned based upon current ratios and trends as well as the physical size of the classroom. Educational Program Capacities change every year. This analysis is for the 2003/04 school year. The capacity of an individual school could and does change at any time depending on program changes,which may require additional space. 12 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2003/04 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 1 SECTION 3 - SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION Building Capacities -The Education Program Portable Locations Student Forecast - 2003 through 2008 ' Capacity Summaries King County Impact Fees - Single and Multi Family Units r r r r r r r 11 1 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2UU3/U4 C AI'I IAL YAULI I Ica 1'LAVI HIGH SCHOOL BOUNDARIES Federal Way Public Schools Every Student.a Roder l `• le 1 ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS MIDDLE SCHOOLS - Code- ■ Code- ■ - r, 1 Adelaide C4 30 Illahes E-9 - °j 19 > 3 Bnpatloon B•8 31 Kilo G-6 1 1= "1 _ 3 Camelot G-5 39 Lakots D-6 _-e , _ .•°� a Enterprise D-9 33 Sacalawea ES n � 5 Green Gables A-7 34 Saphake C-8 75z - 6 Lake Dolloff G-6 35 Totem G4 7 Lake Grow D-6 35 Federal Way Public Academy E-8 sn..... _ 8 Lakeland E-B uN v.n 3 s m S. 9 Mark Twain F-4 T _ 10 Meredith Hill H-5 SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS - 11 Miner Lake E-6 '_ 3 12 Nautilus E'S Code- ■ 3 J I 13 Olympic View C-7 _ r `-• �u 14 Panther Lake E-11 e0 Decatur C-6 I.• 15 Rainier View F-10 e1 Federal Way E-S /P ] t 35 i 16 Sherwood Forest D•B eT Thomas Jefferson GJ 17 Silver Lake 0-7 45 Todd Beaman, E-9 . . 18 Sur Lake G-3 e9 Harry S Truman F-6 zrs si 19 Sunnycreat G-0 ...... a s.c 30 Twin Lakes 6-6 <N y ^^ 31 Valhalla G4 sl 3 ^ i >n ` 33 Wildwood F-5 Future School Saes - a3 Woodmont FJ Surplus Sites - 4 _ 1 G r' y •,i:s 3Y ,,3 4 81 Educational Service Center F-6 - e_ D t. 85 Maintenance-operations-Transportation E4 - Code- ■ - aT it 21% E.G Tr •.� aM fl —� Parks - D pz.n •'z .a `., .�L il 3 EEDE77AL WAY. WASHINGTON and VICINITY ^Y. 37• a - - , '� F s DUNo ( ••RZ tl w - .. - [��,' A.• •� I � •I ^ZO a0 taw j•'ia `'s. S - ,.,5 3 s izo s. 3^ � 1- •F P1RR r �m. i. r � - —. � V'T. ... f t' V :�i, ' s -sa.Y �sry � a Dp I• _ N .onw...f aF"' 1 3•� s' t j _ t' 18 W* 4 ""a "tti. .! •z S" ,.�w« •e 'r. •l/.j f >j ^a• .E S 35.6 St•.....ra..s....o--..r..N_rs.s. -a a 9 3 8 �r J you•••:` "°i-•S` �.•. •;�"'� 45 +f. ,/`'71x�• ' V c•wr.•�is ry.�.r �e t ra,Wz ^^. ai - �-a��_ � ..P.oa x.cr in..us n 5• 7z a�1 w E• : ^"tom- .'J]6 tnr P a ;�u{ Federal Way Public Schools ` s Y Every Student,a Reader :••" i NnTON in • • auPms.s.nu. N+p Prrm MIITON Teun Y s.szaae 11 E F G H 10 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2003104 CAP rIAL MC1LI I ILS PLAN MIDDLE SCHOOL BOUNDARIES ♦ • E ors ao.xrs F a-a.., ........G H Federal Way Public Schools =: o Every Student.a Header raj-` ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS MIDDLE SCHOOLS Code- ■ Code- , h 1 Adelaide C-6 30 Blahee E-9 2 Brigadoon 13-9 31 Kilo G4 2 I_ - ♦+ - 2 3 Camelot GS 32 Lakots D-b - r•` F• 4 Erderprne 0-9 33 Saca mea E-5 I _ - 5 Green Gables A-7 34 Saghalle C-6 •. 6 Lake Dolloff G-6 35 Totem G-3 _ 7 take Grove 0-5 36 Federal Way Public Academy E-6 B Lakeland E-9 a•r••• - - 3 9 Mark Twain F-4 - 10 Meredith Hill H-5 SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS nc4�• f g' - �j 1/ Muror Lake E-6 12 NautlIts E-5 Code_ . 3 s ,-i - 3 13 Olympic"Ise" C-7 14 Panther Lake E-9 - 15 Rainier Wsw F-10 40 Decatur C� ✓/- ]' -/ 1 ` 41 Federal Way E-5 16 Sherwood Forasl D-6 42 Thomas Jefferson G� _ a 17 Sdver Laks D-7 45 Todd Beamer EA 18 Star Lake G-3 _ 18 49 Harry S Truman FE a 19 S'nnyrnst G-2 wcoo"o 20 Twm Lakes B-5 +••r" g 22 Wiltlwo0d F-5 Future School Sites -M 27 WootlmoM FJ Surplus Sills 4 4 Bt Educational Seincs Center F-6 - ' 95 Maintenance-0pentions-Transportation E-6 - Code- ■ t 42 yi• uxc Tv Parks - u - L•i„k 31 A R S FEDERAL WAY, WASJYING70N and VIC/NIT 1}oUHp , e 22 3 `to ram ' sY t❑.aeJ.{ r.S t S L N -r raw,,. 1• - •6 ]t - was i.r 1 G .. L .mr.32 el" ..p, -•tt f f -B7 [ r•" _ F :_- l -6 a•, rom*1 a-• ..f "n '••2U f .w r •d - ,'.Sr 49 asaan 7 ... ✓'i '..Ma 0 ., t 's sae i a` o° 1 a. 18 W ® G C ysi I. n �i;;rf ray^ ' I _S i cFiool u s.u,�i.gnrw....�.x®N•s. a r . }n ,f i 1` - 413s P� �• w rI Federal Way Public Schools Every Student.a Reader y • a„T«,fa • Bufinaf Sev.ra+ a.M Coinry 1 r 39+M H 9 ' FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOULJ GUUJIU4 I-Ar I imi-rrtwt t t trio ri,niv ELEMENTARY SCHOOL BOUNDARIES E _us r°xe, F mow... a—.+r G N FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 210 ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS Code-- Code-- ■ n 10 Adelaide C4 64 Illahee E-9 .e 16 Brigadoon 96 66 Kdo G-0 2 '- =-- (; •/•'2 28 Camelot G-5 62 Lakota D-0 ,+'L ,.r^• 22 Enterprise D-9 61 Saca,awea E-5 - _ 14 Green Gables A-7 70 Saghalie G-0 30 Lake 13011oR G-6 65 Totem G-3 - 1 11 Lake Grove D6 8 Mont F-4 ��•%^ ' 33 Lakeland F-9 i• -'� ,i 2 Mark Twain F•4 29 Meredith Hill H-5 SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS 11 6 Mirror Lake E-6 3 - ,J 3 3 5 Naublus E4 Code 15 Olympic Ylew C-7 ,• ' 21 Panther Lake E-6 80 Decatur C-a ,• _ "_�� Y 37 Ramrer Yew F-10 81 Federal Way E-5 41 Sherwood Forest D4 63 Thomas Jefferson G6 24 S Ivey Lake D-7 'O _• - f an u. '' 8 Harty S Truman F4 n•r" 26 Star Lake G-3 8 Meru F4 25 Sunnycrset G-2 13 Twin Lakes B6 ,•,'lea' >^ 27 Valhalla G6 Future Schad Sites— 4 •i" ' ', °1l'"° y 7 Wildwood F-5 Surplus Sites 1 Woodmont F-3 ,l 100 Educational Service Center F-4 99 Future Support Services E-0 _ Code--■ r— ^' 97 MamtenanceOparebons•TransPonation E4 - �'• 1 �� Parks- D p.\ V'J; r `7 FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON and VICINITY It'�r n`• r '17 0 W* • •mil — c. —.. '� S wo.r.a•o.m•rv. iii is»e:si'T , 5 r i . i w CgrmM1t•M M,y��na1 e~ - .nwa r.u,•ru. �` � • t L .ilk Y' — �. ':, FEDERAL ,. ;*:..: WAY ,o � , � ,o IY1fl>rL�W 1L � ri[ten "V r 2 i.fs F.ene,.r (253) 945-2000 _ f:wc•li+m°- _ iaira W E (' or G "�• N 8 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2003/04 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN f SECTION 2. MAPS OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES Federal Way Public Schools (the District) has twenty-three elementary schools (grades K-5), seven middle school schools (grades 6-8), five senior high schools (grades 09-12) and one alternative schools (grades 7-12) for the 2003/04 school year. The Internet Academy serves grades K-12. In June 2002 the Board of Education adopted new secondary boundaries beginning with 2003/04 school year. A boundary committee will meet in the 2003/04 school year to recommend modifications to the elementary boundaries. The following maps show the service area boundaries for each school for each grade level (Harry S. Truman High School, Merit School, Internet Academy and Federal Way Public Academy serve students from throughout the District). The identified boundaries are reviewed annually. Any change in grade configuration or adoption of programs that affect school populations may necessitate a change in school service areas. The Growth Management Act requires that a jurisdiction evaluate if the public facility infrastructure is in place to handle new housing developments. In the case of most public facilities, new development has its major impact on the facilities immediately adjacent to that development. School Districts are different. If the District does not have permanent facilities available, interim measures must be taken until new facilities can be built or until boundaries can be adjusted to match the population changes to the surTounding facilities. Adjusting boundaries requires careful consideration by the District and is not taken lightly. It is recognized that there is a potential impact on students who are required to change schools. Boundary adjustments impact the whole district, not just one school. It is important to realize that a single housing development does not require the construction of a complete school facility. School districts are required to project growth throughout the district and build or adjust boundaries based on growth throughout the distnct, not just around a single development. 1 I is 7 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2003/04 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Six Year Finance Plan ' Secured Funding Sources 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Total Reven Impact Fees(1) $398,475 $248,600 $248,600 $248,600 $248,600 $99,830 $1,491,705 Land Sale Funds(2) $987,705 $987,70 Bond Funds(3) $18,892,353 $18,892,353 TOTAL I 519 290,828 5248,600 S248,600 51,236,305 5248,600 598,830 S21 371,763 Unsecured Funding Sources State Match Funds(5) $13,294,106 Bond or Le Funds(3) $26,500, Land Fund Sales(6) Impact Fees(4) $1,500" OTAL S41 294,106 NEW SCHOOLS 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2009 Total Cost Middle School(9) $233,045 $500,000 $12,827,400 $1,839,555 $15,400, Todd Beamer High School(12) $19,867,263 $1,980,717 $21,847,98 Todd Beamer High School Site(10) $ NLddle School Site(11) $1,600,000 $1,600, ' Federal Way Public Academy(14) $2,578,4231 $2,578,423 MODERNIZATION ANDEXPANSION S Truman Senifun h(Alternative) $2,384,718 $2,384,718 n Ex aion NLddle Schools(13) $1,500,000 $300,000 $1,800, Expansion Elementary Schools $1,000,000 $500,000 $1,500, TEMPORARY FACILITIES Portables(7) $398,475 $159,390 $557,865 OTHER $ School Improvements(8) $726,000 $4,852 $730,852 Facilities Department $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $1,500, OTAL f $30,537,924 $3,694,959 $13,077,400 $2,089,555 $250,000 $250,000 $49,899,83 NOTES: I These fees are currently being held in a King County,City of Federal Way and City of Kent unpact fee account,and will be available for use by the District for system improvements 2 These funds come from various sales of land and are set aside for estimated expenditures 3 These funds will be used for future projects 4 These are projected fees based upon known residential devitJopments in the District over the next six years S. These funds are projected state matching funds 6 These funds are projected land sale income Tutting of the sale of surplus property is not known at this time 7 These fees represent the cost of moving and siting existing portables and purchasing new portables The Distna may choose to purchase new portables in the years shown This estimate may also include the cost of purchasing these portables 8 These projects have been approved by the Board of Directors and cover most schools These projects do not increase capacity These projects include school networks,mfommauou and library systems,new classroom start up,elementary playgrounds and high school spoors fields, music equipment,emergency communication 9 Total expenditure for Middle School through 12I312002$0 00 10 Site purchase for Todd Beamer High School of$3 2 M was complete in the 2000 calendar year 11 Costs associated with site for Middle School 12 Total expenditures through the 12/31/2002 for Todd Beamer High School is$24,502,020 13 Middle School rapacity increase to accommodate transition 14 Total expenditures for Federal Way Public Academy through 12/31/2002 is$2,421,577 L6 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2003/04 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN NEEDS FORECAST - NEW FACILITIES ' NEW FACILITY LOCATION ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF FUNDS New Middle School Site 74 Anticipated source of Ifunds is state matching funds, Impact Fees, future bond issues and/or non- voted debt issues. L i 5 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2003/04 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN NEEDS FORECAST- EXISTING FACILITIES rEXISTING FACILITY FUTURE NEEDS ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF FUNDS Purchase and Relocate Intenm Capacity Anticipated source of funds is Portables Impact Fees. Various School Sites Parking Safety; Network Anticipated source of funds is ` Upgrades; Automated future bond issues. Libranes; Elementary Playgrounds; High School Sports Fields; Emergency Communications. Middle School Sites Expansion Anticipated source of funds is future bond sales. 4 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2003104 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CURRENT INVENTORY NON-INSTRUCTIONAL FACILITIES Developed Property Administrative Building 31405 18th Avenue S Federal Way 98003 MOT Site 1066 S 320th Street Federal Way 98003 Central Kitchen 1344 S 308th Street Federal Way 98003 Federal Way Memorial Field 1300 S 308th Street Federal Way 98003 fLeased Space Community Resource Center 1928 S Sea Tac Mall Federal Way 98003 ECEAP Offices 30819 14'h Ave S Federal Way 98003 Undeveloped Property Site# Location SW 360th Street & 3rd Avenue SW—9.2 Acres 1 S 351st Street & 52nd Avenue S — 8.8 Acres 60 E of loth Avenue SW - SW 334th & SW 335th Streets - 10.04 Acres 69 E of 47th Avenue SW & SW 314th Place * - 10 Acres 73 N of SW 320`h and east of 45`h PL SW—23 45 Acres 71 S 344th Street &46th Avenue S - 17.47 Acres 72 36600 block of Pacific Highway S* - 32 81 Acres 82 1"Way S and S 342°d St—Minimal acreage 74 3737 S 360" St - 47.13 Acres (12- 15 acres in wetlands) 96 S 308`h St and 14`h Ave S —.36 Acres INotes: Not all undeveloped properties are large enough to meet school construction requirements. Properties may be traded or sold depending on what locations are needed to house students in the District. I * Site 69 and site 72 are sold pending final sale adjustments. These property sales should be finalized before the 2003/04 school year. I 3 I t' FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2003/04 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN INVENTORY OF EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS Adelaide 1635 SW 304th Street Federal Way 98023 Brigadoon 3601 SW 336th Street Federal Way 98023 Camelot 4041 S 298th Street Auburn 98001 Enterprise 35101 5th Avenue SW Federal Way 98023 Green Gables 32607 47th Avenue SW Federal Way 98023 Lake Dolloff 4200 S 308th Street Auburn 98001 Lake Grove 303 SW 308th Street Federal Way 98023 Lakeland 35675 32nd Avenue S Auburn 98001 Mark Twain 2450 S Star Lake Road Federal Way 98003 Meredith Hill 5830 S 300th Street Auburn 98001 Mirror Lake 625 S 314th Street Federal Way 98003 ' Nautilus 1000 S 289th Street Federal Way 98003 Olympic View 2626 SW 327th Street Federal Way 98023 Panther Lake 34424 1st Avenue S Federal Way 98003 Rainier View 3015 S 368th Street Federal Way 98003 Sherwood Forest 34600 12th Avenue SW Federal Way 98023 Silver Lake 1310 SW 325th Place Federal Way 98023 Star Lake 4014 S 270th Street Kent 98032 Sunnycrest 24629 42nd Avenue S Kent 98032 Twin Lakes 4400 SW 320th Street Federal Way 98023 Valhalla 27847 42nd Avenue S Auburn 98001 Wildwood 2405 S 300th Street Federal Way 98003 Woodmont 26454 16th Avenue S. Des Moines 98198 MIDDLE SCHOOL SCHOOLS Federal Way Public Academy 34620 9`�Avenue S Federal Way 98003 Illahee 36001 1st Avenue S Federal Way 98003 Kilo 4400 S 308th Street Auburn 98001 Lakota 1415 SW 314th Street Federal Way 98023 Sacajawea 1101 S Dash Point Road Federal Way 98003 Saghalie 33914 19th Avenue SW Federal Way 98023 M Totem 26630 40th Avenue S Kent 98032 SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS Decatur 2800 SW 320th Street Federal Way 98023 Federal Way 30611 16th Avenue S Federal Way 98003 Thomas Jefferson 4248 S 288th Street Auburn 98001 Todd Beamer 35999 16th Ave S Federal Way 98003 ' Harry S Truman 31455 28th Ave S Federal Way 98003 ALTERNATIVE SCHOOLS Merit School 4248 S 2881s St Auburn 98001 LEASED SPACES LInternet Academy 32020 lst Ave S Federal Way 98003 2 L FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2003/04 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 1 - THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN The State Growth Management Act requires that several pieces of information be gathered to determine the facilities available and needed to meet the needs of a growing community. This section provides information about current facilities, existing facility needs, and expected future facility requirements for Federal Way Public Schools. This is followed by a Financial Plan which shows expected funding for any new construction, portables and modernization listed. I 1 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2003104 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Internet Academy is currently operating out of leased space consisting of administrative areas and a computer lab area. This capacity is not included in the analysis of instructional spaces. The facility needs are unique to a program of"distance learners". Federal Way Public Academy opened in the 1999/00 school year in six portables on the Illahee Junior High site. Two additional portables were added for opening the 2000/01 school year to expand the program to include ninth grade students. The school served 180 seventh, eight and ninth grade students this year and is projected to serve 300 students in grades 6 through 10 in the 2003 school year. The District purchased a new facility for Federal Way Public Academy. The renovation of this building is currently under way and students should be able to move into the building by September 2003. The portables used to house Federal Way Public Academy will be removed from the classroom inventory in 2003/04. These portables will be used for administrative functions. The District is facing unique challenges with declining enrollment at some levels and anticipated reductions in State funding for education. Elementary populations have declined the last two years and projections through 2006/07 show no anticipated growth at this level. Because of the anticipated enrollment decline at elementary and the reconfiguration from K-6 to K-5,District committees have introduced the concept of closing an elementary school in the near future. A committee will be meeting in the 2003/04 school year to study elementary populations and boundaries. A recommendation from this body could possibly include consolidating the elementary populations into fewer facilities. Many filters considering educational requirements and fiscal responsibility will be used to develop a recommendation to the Board. As smaller class sizes roll forward into the secondary levels, we anticipate a slight decline at middle school between 2006 and 2009 This does not diminish the need to open a new middle school in the 2005 school year. Middle school facilities are overcrowded at current enrollment levels and portables are considered a temporary solution to this overcrowding. Even with the opening of the new middle school in 2005, projections based on current program capacity show that 418 middle school students will still be housed in portable facilities. v FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2003/04 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN INTRODUCTION (continued) Federal Way citizens approved a bond proposal of$83 million in September 1999. This bond will provide for a comprehensive high school ($44 million); a middle school ($17 rmllion); expansion and improvement of existing schools ($9 million); replacement of Truman High School ($6 million) and other general improvements ($7 million). Additional planned improvements included in the bond proposal are: parking and pedestrian safety, playgrounds and sports fields, new classroom start-up and music ' equipment, information systems and networks and emergency communications. Harry S. Truman High School moved into the new building in March 2003. This building is well designed for smaller high schools that is integral to the Truman program. Students and staff are pleased with the flexibility of the building. Todd Beamer High School will open in September 2003. The school will open with three grades, 9u', 10`b and 11`'. Seniors in 2003/04 will be allowed to complete their high school education at the current high school. This does put some strain on capacity at the three existing high schools. In order to accommodate this decision measures to maximize the capacity in the existing buildings are being implemented and two portables will be added to high school campuses. Capacity for the 2003/04 school year was calculated at 100% Lusage in order to give the 12`h grade students the opportunity to stay at the current school. Todd Beamer High School was designed with planning offices for teachers; Decatur, Federal Way and Thomas Jefferson do not have designated planning areas. In order to accommodate planning space for teachers, capacity must be calculated at 83% of maximum as planning generally takes place in the classrooms. This 83% figure is used in the Program Capacity calculation for Decatur High School,Federal Way High School and Thomas Jefferson High School shown on page 13. A Middle School Transition Team began meeting in May 2001 to develop recommendations for the middle school programs. These recommendations were adopted by the Board of Education on March 25, 2002. The adopted recommendations include block instruction with 2 teacher teams meeting with about 60 students daily. This structure lengthens contact time for students with fewer adults and is believed to develop stronger relationships. Fewer transitions for students will provide continuity to the day and promote a calmer campus. The 2003/04 Capital Facilities Plan reflects a reduced capacity to accommodate the middle school block instruction. The facility impacts will require further analysis of capacity as the middle school curriculum is refined. Funding for anticipated capacity needs is set at $1.8 million for construction and $1.3 million for additional portables. Federal Way Public Schools opened the Internet Academy in the 1996/97 school year with 60 students. This program currently serves approximately 542 students, 107 are students also served in other Federal Way School District buildings. The forecast for this school is based on current average annual enrollment. Historical growth has not been a reliable tool to forecast this enrollment. Internet Academy has become a model for providing quality 1 instruction to various locations. There is a probability that the Internet Academy will serve more students in the coming years. iv FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2003104 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN INTRODUCTION MIn response to the requirements of the State of Washington Growth Management Act (SHB 2929 (1990) and ESHB 1025 (1991)), and under the School Impact Fee Ordinances of King County Code 21A, City of Federal Way Ordinance No. 95-249 effective December 21, 1995 as amended, and the City of Kent Ordinance No. 3260 effective March 1996, Federal Way Public Schools has updated its 2002/03 Capital Facilities Plan as of June 2003. This Plan is scheduled for adoption by King County, the City of Kent and the City of Federal Way and is incorporated in the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction by reference. This plan is also included in the Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. To date, the City of Des Moines has not adopted a school impact fee ordinance. The Growth Management Act requires the County to designate Urban Growth areas within which urban growth can be encouraged. The Growth Management Planning Council adopted and recommended to the King County Council four Urban Growth Area Line Maps with designations for urban centers. A designation was made within the Federal Way planning area, which encompasses Federal Way Public Schools boundaries. King County will encourage and actively support the development of Urban Centers to meet the region's need for housing, jobs, services, culture and recreation. This Plan's estimated population growth is prepared with this underlying assumption. This Capital Facilities Plan will be used as documentation for any jurisdiction, which requires its use to meet the needs of the Growth Management Act. This plan is not intended to be the sole planning too] for all of the District needs. The District may prepare interim plans consistent with Board policies. Additional plans will be consistent with the six year Capital Facilities Plan. On October 12, 1998 the Federal Way School District Board of Education approved a recommendation to move to a Pre K-5 elementary, 6-8 middle school, and 9-12 high school grade configuration beginning in the fall of 2003 or as additional high school space allows. This grade configuration is believed to be more responsive to student needs. It will allow for smaller elementary enrollments with room for lower primary class sizes. The middle school will provide more developmentally appropriate instruction and abetter academic transition between elementary school and high school. Middle schools will also allow two-year preparation for the WA State 7`h grade test, and matches most western Washington Districts. With State and District standards beconung even tougher, 9`s grade students need to be brought into the high school environment and given access to high school subject specialist. The four-year high school plan combines the 9-12 graduation credit system, allows two-year preparation for the WA State 10°i grade test, and physically places the high school students together. iii I FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2003/04 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS NTABLE OF CONTENTS ii INTRODUCTION tit-v SECTION 1 THE CAPITAL FACIUTIES PLAN Introduction I Inventory of Educational Facilities 2 Inventory of Non-Instructional Facilities 3 Needs Forecast-Existing Facilities 4 Needs Forecast -New Facilities 5 Six Year Finance Plan 6 SECTION 2 MAPS OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES MIntroduction 7 Map -Elementary Boundaries 8 Map - Middle school Boundaries 9 Map - Senior High Boundaries 10 SECTION 3 SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION Introduction 11 Building Capacities 12-13 Portable Locations 14-15 Student Forecast 16-18 Capacity Summaries 19-23 King County Impact Fee Calculations 24-26 SECTION 4 SUMMARY OF CHANGES FROM THE 2002103 PLAN 27-30 i �r i FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2003/04 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2003/04 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN BOARD OF EDUCATION Ed Barney Charles Hoff Bob IvMllen Don Putman Earl VanDorien SUPERINTENDENT Thomas R. Murphy i 1 1 1 Federal Way Public Schools � 1 � 2003/04 � Capital Facilities Plan 1 1 • 1 f 1 i 1 1 f � Buildingfor the 21s' Century I � _ MOO (n M1 (n OD M Col MOOOM1cOrr No U uL M1CgOM000 w0O t (D V (I� rOONMr C O(p (O Ntna OMTIf� gip = 000000 00 C C r 040000N V- O) N rOM1OV 000N � � rOODOMOOtON ;� rOT000000 N gaOOOg6 C5C; O j 0 N W N W n M N r to T M1 M M 10, T to O Cn E t 00 N O T CO of Of a) rj N 0 0 0 T T O O O O W O O O O O O O O O a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o e C=j 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CD 0 0 NN T T T T T T T T r O LL Co M (D co M1 CD M s{ O O r M1 V (D N V OD C r T (C9 d U UO - � O � 0 OM1D 7 cCl) V w M O N 'a 0 O V to O Q t (� 0o S UU N O co O N O O co m U 5 7 L 2 � TNTO (DTONCO) ^� W, r r r T ({S � W _ E AIL LLLLLLLLLLLLLLa 7 7 7 3 > 575 7 y N F (D C_ E E a N 2 07 ZFa� 3V � 3 W Y C O N CO CL l0 O CO N Q `- a a a O a v 3 0 c c W c`o o U- 0 0 0 � � ca as w E Er v m 0 — = 0 W WUM dti22 M c) M O (O O w CO 0 0 10 0 t0 T O O t� O r o O O O N O M Q Q O N M O r r M h 1- 0 0 tO N r O O t, t- 'It 0O to O O (O M to O tO 00 O M M Q O r O r to � M M M l0 (O N tO CO t0 tO a0 CO tO t17 n N O lO n f\ V O N r O O O N r r O O CO A O mMIIiCDr WOa0rn � NNQ nOtOOnn (ONW 'a MtON (hnOCOO � (ht0 V OOOTO00 O OO O 000. 0 Or 00000 (V OOOO r OOOOO t0 LL M r h O h N O t- 10 1` 00 t, (0 O O O M M N t0 O O t� r 0 tl- N O h O O M O C pltOD r f� n N 0 0 0 M Q CMO (00 O N n 0 0 CO O 1` t0 O CO co O O r N N r O N N r r r O N N M tO O M O r r h r O O r M N M r O r R = 0 0 0 cc 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0000 0 00 00 O O O O 4) 11 tv) tDOh 0) co O (O M t0O COr 0p MONOr OO 40 OwVJQNOTr C Ma 1.- O r CD (O O 1� M N O r Q O 10 co O V V N O tO tO N tt IMC:'I t, IfiN N T O r M M 0 CO CDt0 0 CO O O NM O t0 V r O N Q Q CD r NM tD O r W � a Or r � Nr rOr 0 00 r NMrMtOrNNr Ott) rOr0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m t- Cl) 0 0 N 0 N N 0 0 t0 N O N op O M t` r- 0 h 0 m w E W w M O NWMONO Nr OOtti O M O N v N OM O O to t0 O 0o 0 (O to N 0) N M 1O0 a M CO CO N LOO r N O V) N O M et !t N N ((00 N O N N r Q a r M W O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O r O 0 0 0 r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1. e 0 0000000000 0 00a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 OOOOt- 00 0 000 00 00 000000 00000 0 000000 VD r r r r r r r r r r T r r r r r T r r 00� N Q N O N N tO r 0 N O co �- 0 DO (O N h 0 M O O NCO r tO Q r N t0 O t0 O r M O N 0 r 0 r r r CO O r Q Q r r (0 'a7 CO r Q N N M Q 0 Q N m (0 M O C Q r r to y _V ci o •L N Q N O O N N r (O N O CCr 0 0 (D CC N h 0 M O O N CD T t0 Q t- N tO O t0 cow-+ r In O N 0 t, 0 r r r CO (D r 't7 Q T r Co Q CO T 'It N N Co -Cr O Q N (O N M O w r r to 0 na r O N N tO n V M M N 0 tO CO T N CO 0 0 0 0 N T N r- M O M (D CO O M N M O LL O L CU N r N r r r r r r r r N col N N N cotO O M r M r tO CD N O N N N O T N h r r N Q N 0 r O M r O Q UN r N r r r r r r r r N r r a N (V (rD M TO CM N 'QV 0 tD IO 0 W O O O N t0 co 0 CD T N n n N Q t0 0 0 O O 4m � W EEEEEE 'EEEEEE "EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL U. C C C C C C C C C C C C c C C C C C C C C C C C c n 6 _C VCoC F_ N _C (Cn _C _C In 0 _o o (_ o _ N60No _ 6 _ _ _ N - N C O .N Y Q d y N r N 0) Y d d a c c c a t o o o m o 0 m 0 N fN 41 q1 MI) N N Z m d y > y m m > > ._ W j w y h w a _d p Y m tom 0 0 t° S m Co m °= d C 0 c a c c m ma c a a W va vi v � � � @ m v d « m � O Q d O N p (0 c0 J 7 C C O y 0 - - •C _ � ic N D .O W '9 T 2 C C C ` L N O O m C C U 3 = = U N ` m m +. w m f. w m O o � n cmi c 0 � . � m m O = °� `m �v rn E EUaa � � m m rn w y M N d N m m N O m m m E > m m 0 0 0 7 7 L L L L r d d N d p QQQootnUU � � W W W W W SJ2d � fYWtA (A (AF- HHF- F- » > � Appendix A,3 Student Generation Survey 412WM03 F- 07 O r r r r r r r r r r r O m r r G0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O r 0 0 0 0 0 eM- M O r r r r r r r cf) r r O p N N nl�o � rorn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 d) o � o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O r r r r r r r r r o p N N O O 6 M V V V V V V V V 0 V V M V Off) W OMi 0 0 0 O O 00 (O Ip O O r r r r r r r r r r ea h N N co 00 Q O p 1� M V Lo N 0) 0 0 0 6 0 N Cl r p a 0 00 m r r r r r r r r tv) E N N � O O 0 p co ++ m co M V V V Lo M O V V 00 (D Lo M ' N M V tD 00 O N N N h O n w 00 00 0 O 0) Q) � 0) 0) O) r m O O r N N r. a ro o M y u) )n )n (n u )n u) rn r +n M 0 rn o r M (n r� aV ao h r N o 00 a 00 r .- r r r r r r r r r r r r p O N f` � 11, r- r- N N w OD 00 O W N N o O F' Z C � W o m o ^y ) d' 00 O O O r 0 0 0 O M r 00 V (O I� m0 N M M M N 1-- O m to 00 O C 00 r N N N N N N N N N N N .- N C> LO )n )n CD (D (D 0 wO w w 0) 0a0 R N N to ol) m o 0 j (D f� aD M 00 00 00 00 00 M O aD (O [> n 0) O r N M N N N (D 00 14, N N p r '- r r r r r r r N N r r N p M M V V V V V V V V V V V N Q A m N N U. a y N M V w lei In O 0 )o Lo O) r )o CO �j N .- N M V V V V V V W w O V) Q r N N N N N N N N N N N N N M V N N O > O O N R O N Q 0 00 41 O O) Q7 d1 O O Q1 O) O 0 00 O 0) D1 O W O o W rr., CID 0) 00 to N N 'a IL 0 CM IL _ co 0cc w o W e N N O Y r N M V (0 (0 1- m O Z 0) ti V N M O^ U > W i W W C C 0 o e o e o e e o e e e e e C C e e e o e e e o e o L Q U y > Go N V C7 r Am N a m CD00 d O c d N r > Q7 z J 0h f, 1- h n P h I- 0) CO � 10 m � y � > V Jn. d ad Nco oo ; C h. C o m o m0. o r > worn 0) 0) � f w z Q z a o y t, E m m m c m 8 t� 40 y y > A m O J C� J 16 ► O + rn = -Eop m A Q O r N M V 0 O r- w O m co y ! ~ a '�O > m w o H U Y F O G o m 7 y m E cdf 0) Y avo N a m IL 'Ja WWI' ��q U" rC N h O {p Iq CD m O O O r to O h rq t0 m N r N to lOD N fr+] r 04 n Ca crfr) w to ��6,....; 'i� �' to i �1 _ u!, LLL C., 0 It Y9'`g�`1 b, r OOOO OOO OOOO O OOOO : O �N M M N"q N 0 r N cc C 0) 0 r, -RT O cD m -` O O 0 0 0 0 O O 00 O O O O O O O N CO (D N (� '• N 00 f.. mcv C ` O m r • , � �� N co r r r O N 7 � r CO 0) O f` C O N N t` f� N r r O N N r f1 OJ tV r r ab N co m r Cm co m N OD N M 0 r O M �{ N M c0 ti O P 0 co O N — r O N r r N c0 r r N M r r O CO r n co c0 a O � L N m O r c0 O W co N co O O O O M 00 c00 00 CCJ n 0) O co n00 0 n N r r 7 r N O r � c0 N N r r � r (D (D N m 04 v — O Z V o C 4. LO N N totW G m O � ° °) oN a an � U:) OD o r co n cO r r 0 0) c0 0) I� 0cc 0) co o p ,n co (D � O C ► O N in N f0 r r N d r r h Q1 c17 r 00 Lo N N a 0 N U mV r cn m o m m r Ln CD - = _O O N N c00 c0 co M O C) co M co M co UDD 6 ^ r N Q {! o a N r r y r f� r N r N c0 LL J toN w 'W � R (p p a ° a O r N O - r am N oCD v r N O N a N W) r t�i M 0) N 7 1cf V mw N N M a' r r M 10 N N 0) l0 r O N O N r r U) 3 O � � N O c O O OD N Qi N .' O N N O O a r r N 0) N , N N 00 (D N �j C O It 7 w w 1l N r N h c0 ,.. O O N r r W) y 0) Itcn r C f` CO � a N O to Lu V V CO r c0 00 O t\ r r O CO N 0 O CO N �. ad N r r N N O r r r M N (D N c0 r O O N c0 O N V N m «_ N O N N c OD N N cn 00 N C4 CO � D W Q o 3 T �C cO � Y w X CD � Y Xk _ v Y m rn co = 3 a c W c m m m M m O E LL cA (C V) W T C LL 0 0 U) Q 0 N m m G C� n C@ __ nn5. p E _ 75 c- OL p n 'E- c u 0 y o u u m E _c Nelda LL ycLCLa aaa D e m m rn LL a 'o �o a : o rn op i!i �+ m m a 0 c m W j LL co iq c W g m o rn Z �C' C9F' moa c �y = � = Fa c = ti C = > c u = Q D C c m m c ay m E tI3 c g a E U1 ° E (IJ Eo QO ~ O m O O O I: m a m O o y m 'O m m mw � m a) m W F illy EW � � o O N hN � fn & JO a J O 0 Cal Q N M v 0 _ •_t m O t m Q a m o i C o 'a' mU � my \ c9 � F •" u a a 00o vooa00000 00000000000evo a rl N a h rrl w N vrn tM0 tO0 0�0 r O W Wa co N N r, r N N r rn 0 w r M C Q a 0�0 N ui r` N m 10 CD ID � y s a O f0 N N � G a � aM0MQ oo � � � � occo � o e maca 3 W a m a co m W) a Nmvrncn � aorno � � c � � m v E f' Y H m o ` ti a �° im Z = 0 W N � $ a (0 m 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m W � 0 a et ItN N v 0 � •7 N m V R N 07 to w N uJ r` N 0 m 7- � '- a- N 00 -cr a L m � m a Cox mim � mommC> co Lome R m W M co to � 0 N v N '1- 0, O C) 0 m W O 9 U � ' a N vNCA m N dE--OC-011 u) cO r` 00 M0000 m O N to O 00 O v O OIT ao v m v O CD00 N O N N 00 0 v O v 3 0 cm N ` b M co h M M A M M h h ! m C �• h h 00 h N CON A CV) M 0M O W > m ti 0, C IC v7 N N h 'Q 01IIt •C k Q U O M o l'0 .Y i- N CO v u) u] r- to 41 '- �- '"• � ti F� N • \• N a O 07 O P, O l0 0) r !1 O r, O f` ! r O O O O r 0 0 O O N N 10 N n N O M O N Qom' 0 0 0 0 0 0 OJ O O O O N r r O h N LO N Oj O O O O h O N .n- M 'ItM 0M i0 LO O0) 0 !f N f` r O •) LO � 0 0 0 0 00 fA O O O O N , 0 10 r N N a � coM �nNrnr `+ rrM �. ornNo �- 00 Q M rn 01 0 CD 0) O 0 m O 0) 0 0 0 N 00)) 7 Cl)40 r r IO r r {y r r r Q N a p , a 0 r 0 )O M O M n 0 0 W Ln M U) y o a � rnrnrnrnrnrn �+ rn � � M � � � � �$} N h mrnrnoDD � 8 NN � P- a °nr) p r 0 0 0 0) 0 O) W) O) � N O) N N w a c V 1 c07 00 M 0) co coo b O O O M LO ID GO O �~•- N 0 d 0) 0 0 0 W 0 co 0 H ar-- O O N IL` c mC mNrr,) MMM mC> C)) C5 MrTiCrnh o O L Q p 0) 0 0 O) 0 O) h 0) O) N N N .f N 0 to W O O) M O M 0 t` aD N O M c0 fro O N 10. HC:) O R d O 0) 0)0) 00)) O 0)i 0)i Ori O N er- N �-- v $ a W m m i+ G 0 0 LO 0) r 0 Cl) M 0 O r O st a OD 0 h W •— N (p r� h n N O N N 0 f` O O r )O CM r N O O Q p a CD O) 0 O) 0 O> 0 � h 6) 0 O N N N N Or a r r [0 0 O r [�[pOp �C�ppO �A O O 0 'cf M f0 0 1 N OD CO CO 0 N 0 R x x 0 0> 61 m ONi A m O 0 m M N N O A 0 M m V 7 d 0 b r N a r r r r g Q C a 5 r cn O O O O ro 0 N U 0 O go m M Z r n r 0) m �{ m m (D m O a_ 0 O O O1 O 0 O) to lr� OO � ao h � � � `�`' e � = � N °pv c e a b O O C O p 0 M h o to M N M 0 V h 0 c0 O n (p fA d O O) Q�i O) O) 6�i h , M Z 0o G C C9 C9 C� C9 U O O CO r r W) I-- 7 r O r W '� -� � oLOo � v � wCL WCl) . a Cl) d) co MC � a 7 m M 01 0 0 O) 0 0 fG L. O r O NM M r OD 0 >, M O } D O to it r r M = r r rlw fp r _ d r O m 0p z 0)0 J M � _ m a Nco O r V r, O n (D O N n w' N CAM h Coo co W U O O 0 O 0 0 r 10 F r r r M r r O t} IO Q m to d N Q Q r N M V LO (D r- OD 0 a N Q o F Y O c4i N Y � N W r n O n r O 0 0 0N N co co �[! } o m o o 0 0 O N r 0 n N O > r r r r r r r N r p to O r O M O N N v c�j n M c0 ap c0 j N 00 s 4 f-. r N (`') N cN � o , Q 000 00nwwr, in0oo Me IcIto � rn �ioo 000voo � � m ago O r r r r r r r r r 0 p N Lo y o O M N n n tj e O n O N In co O O O OI 0 0) 0 0 0 0) O O � r Or � � � •' O Op O M u7 a N M .- cn N N c0 in v o n in r r O M fA C O a +" O Obi N OO n oND �N�pp M tO�nn try CD tD O co LO LO .O W O O Cr Or 0) O O 0) Oi 0) N{ N M C OOj O 0 E far arno�i `�, o� rno, � oomCM o O Z C M .V-. W Onj M w O O Grp n c0 O M N r' r � Of 0 0 0 CO 0 O O co co N f0 r O C r r r N (7 La u C ^ 0Oj n W 0) r O V M O n n c0 M 0 N .0 O � 0) 0) 4m 0) ({pp �p r O N apLf) N W 00 O DD n N Q W O LL r 0 o 0: pOj n V n M r M V N It M W 0) N � � ch a , N m c0 o N M N n O r c0 1n cp A a0+ IT O O O O O O O M � � O OD O � N N V C m E e N IC004) OOOMtNOWOrNc0 n c0 M Nu! rnO �iOrnOmOco �icor, (D Oo O r r r O M V 0 r (D O NOW N n M n N 0 0 co O .- rnm000aoOwoaoonnoMM w 0 0 a rn0 0 aU) 0 rninn �nnm0n O O O M t0 O N Ln cn N M O n W cp _ I O co O co coco N co n O O O N N c7 0 } C m 00 n N Co 0 r O 0 n O c0 O N m O M N a0 b M n N 0Oi Go O O co co co n n n h n n t0 O t r C F R Uj W J � m M V cn 0 n m O r O a N H C7 ~lal `" 7 m a V O N O n O O c0 c ao O n n N co tO O O O) 0) O 0) m N R N n N O co I, d' M 0 0 0 0 O O h O r r M CO N N O QO v a r r r r r r r 10 r r r M r r r r Q r M r lO 00 0 M co M 00n �. O v 00 w 0O D O) O) N r N N I.- to r aO O r r M M N r r {p ,a a O " n r a N O M r O (D CD (0 0) O Cl) (D (0 M M 00 00 O O 00 /. 0) r r r r N N 00 R w r 0 0 0 0 0 0 a O , r M Cl) N 4 0 00 a ('0 co C y O m (D r M n o co )O -'T N (D N (D h (O N O n a0 O r ca N LO W O M n 00 CO M W 00 r O O O r 0) r (0 a A w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O r r (7 N N r r m m a r r r r r r r (0 r r r M r r r r v ` t A 07 a a A M C y 00 O O I V7 0 N N 00 D) O 1D O V (o (D A r m m In m m O N n n OD O 00 N 00 r (O h N 'IT N O W (0 00 Q„' O) O O O O O O WT O r 0 (V M N N N O) a E M � � : a C) r r �-- r r r 40 r r r M r r r r Q r v = m to co m Z = W 0 W to O M N O O !� M D1 r (r O O (n M W r N O N n n M M 00 !• 00 (0 r (q 0) O r V- N n O C cr OD 0 0 0 0 0 0 `p O O r N N N M N �- < a r r r r r r r fp r r r M r r r r Iq r 8a c U) 00 c m 7 Vi 0 C, aD M n O 0to M OD r )D M N co O o 3 O O a r (D V7 (S n m N , N N co40 M 10 m r r Q •� = r C ? w a O 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 O o M F M W IC 3 C) LL m O O C C m Z M O N O T O = m d M n N 00N r 0 0 M OD 7 �- ttpp CD n (0 N O C) O , O v (n (D (D M n O O M O) OD N N M O m N O 3 "' W W O O CD O O N G O C, NM M N r �. V p m 3 0 CL rrrrrrgD rrrM .- rrrh z 7 _ = O N O .�' o' (D o -NCO Or (O V MNw -'r 0) )OrCo Q m _ p D) lL O C M Cl) M 7 0) (O �? N co (o r (D N N O _ � C (n Q' (O O O O O O O w O O r N V N N Cl) N a d V L b N L a 0 r r r r (m r r r M r r r r )Q r co m 7 a y m 0 (f'i 0 z m m = a L U Q. IL Q = O V co (O (o O) N (D 0) O (D O O n N co d O 00 r OD co O !� v D) Oo Go O) O r m p O ` Q' V �j 0 0 0) 0 0 0 O r (y N N V !� V w p O a 0 r r fO r r M r r r r y r ar � c o $ m m o 0 0 0 c o E E MQ'• V a E ' O O N O 'T N O O 0) M 00 r (`o c`7 1- O M N w m m ° c7 U 0 7 Ir i;5 m a , Q C.) oo v N co co e Q O O � N o C N a-0 Qrn rno (n fro (••) NV NOS r M r r r r O a` m ` °) o W c a t� c y c m QD m $ E Q MCD '�O E = a Q m O 0 0 (D V r O a O N Co (r1 v M N ((j M a a () N O O .O = U Q O) rn O D1 0 0 0 0 M r 04 O O Q r9 r O. S Z U U d W Q CD W W W C m r W O h O r N r N M m r N M <T (D ` (D n o0 ` 0) r r r ` o o o c L) COL Y wad m cic Appendix A.2 - CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Enrollment Projections 412912003 N O O a� m Oe Y t � iA m E � m � N 0 r N � m L � � � � ZLO m m Q O O O O > v v� Q 4'1 fV M N Q 00 G O 0 < < U m _ �5 m Rm � � N 0 R � D � ep C) N y N to S x S = K W K J . , g R w m 5 � 4 >- T } } —M C4 r OO lci O �R5 rN MOr u�i °r m_ � mMr° gg gq{ a� ao io16 Z riofofm f F F r W a a as ar (/� R N Rai, R V m aR Q m CO Nr, N Q N N F m CL�r,U-; coraor 0000 U 'o Z7i 4 � ,:, 4 tsu^, vQ 4 = tsg� Qgt 4 � is ^ va F- � « S2 o v m Q o R v 2G 52 o R 2G i 1 2G C-4 S2 o R �C� O CD W a o p in < o O 00 Q1n0N � 7R S2 NON � NMN v O O N Y 1A Y to a � aa Q 0 B Z o f o R � � m 0 R � `n �v' 0 � � $ m � R � � � e �." S 0zaa Y a cli 0 4! �o MJ c7 en 17 01 17 � 30 ELFob Q W m m ID2 < •M- b f5 Q m m a m LLl W W LLl al W W W W LLI ui ui W $ 7 W W W W co N H M M M M {— M to M M • ►- M M M l7 f- M l7 M N I<- 0 ]C as aas < aaaaa G9 � < a rr - Ur 'crr �aa cC9 < aaaa M 0 N d li N O O fj O r 0 Q Ol 47 Q C V In �' Q A N 7 m r r mm pp r co FE # to EDD r m m� F� m FM �i m N I n N .: w C IDP 7R M R fN C LO S2 O^i V! r) C M r4 r v v v N O v 0 - O C CSO v o � y r Y Y 6 _ 0 rypmi0 �C$�aO C Oi lD T 10D o a Y } ZR ]R 2R ��55 7R rR ]R :R �$ ZR 7R rR ?R DODO L-n 50 $t � � � n Q � Y) rtGn D � Vl C'4 N V) y O O v N v N N N r N •- IX IX Ir i j5 10 �$ q v v v W O !� 1� OD SZ r N r � mmm Of r 41 _ r mIn cc m Z F F F F W a a a a ZR � yQ C �U) 2R �ino�in tR � I,-: Qe�im � e�i U cis Ln r r O in se; w D � C84 � NNNNN S Nty ' NR Q o �5 m an 2R 29 jj$$ m aR 'Rm jj e�� ZR ZY�Rt ZR �{ ZR N ZCR ZttOpR O cn N R N N N N [O 1N Ir L' O G m ei O O O O r G yr C G C N .- 7 •- aa cNVN `i0 ROD CD QS Oza r rn N r vw r r Itg Y F F F F s F a Q v m m Q m N `�' m m q� Q m S JID aw ui ww ffi 7wW w W ^ 7 wLU LLlW wW W W m ti m F- lq 47 FI 47 F 17 N Cl) 10 F f0 17 l0 10 F' 17 17 (7 O] H U' X4R` n. ad UZ` < ILIL IL (9 � aaanD. 4C'Jaaaaa O N O a o `o lot ZR be CO vefvoi ^ ^ ^ � 1�p 2 n (Op N CD pp G iV yp ��myy m 0 OJ O! 1- N AD E tO Its ♦- � NN� � r QANNA u°1 0 �5 ?R 2F zR zR aR zR ��55 aF tR aR OR aR aR eR aR i u Qt�im � m `ao "ao �a � o � o aR SWWi, � �m o ^ o 000oID vtnve� R ^ ^ ^ .- Se i t Qo- t W 0 SZ 1�i O O�i s S2 2^„ N t.^Vi N O�1 ❑ R Obi ro O�1 vi O S2 �i aD C O1 G to V u 1Y� m 1u I�nj CI !O Ol 00 CI A (YV 17s� 7 `� Q H § m END t0 F N N N N N 12 C1 N N C N Ln t�0 IO t0 7 tl b ^ ^ i a: a: 2�S5 aR aR aR � �5 at �5 aR aR aR aR aR aR aR aR F- ODO Rro �in Q � t�i � �i R � N � t'v aR g1O' � �i y N 12 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M N t7 N O CO 0 0 ^ m ^ m .- w d A5� _N n C N N h r n !` A ,� 10 Oi t0 Z Nc CL F ID m ID 10 F lV N ri N IN�V F m F •�- W a a a O H a o 0 0 ^ 0 N N 2S w R � Nn � O 0 O 2 N O R a Y v O N m (t p�p ply pN� o cV (�VV N ((VV fV o Q o a H 1G m In m CD N N C .p N N N /- N N N (� X9 O j zaV) A rR NR to 7R aRm (p �5 NaR aRcn6 HN O NO0 0 0 0 o fVCNC 7 0 0 m n a` �5 _ �5 D R � � °Dini0 ft 'N E cr-qt�i � t- o z a ^ mi II �p NO N �p ��yy yryC�Dj m �p mm ryry P (tO�� t- N pNp M p O < .�. F f0 m fD CL ui < � m-t a -j t7t7 aa m m gy Q � m � mEi - � to ro ^ to to N tD Ul ) z r M Ip m F n M m V) {�- n Pi M b W LAIm W UI H Naadaa C7 � aaaaa` aaaaa aC�Ja0. aa a m O N O n N O SOm �Q m 'Om NIB OHO 2 ' m a EL JL AL a OWN pm m Om 'aen �pmm o '' mm a a a a y a d C a ?u pp �y _M 0M Z mM W o) a L 1a Y PN0 C s O V N vnV7 CaL �a � N .7 0gg 11 w CL w � IL a � eyS NRi a ' v � a _ ` z O it Z aO °� a � a � � < � < aa � W ` ° MgQ OSo M$ Od a d z � W 0 $ n n �p C-4 �Qj n o pQQ3 CO ��p p O �Qg3 rn m z a 0 0�1 Go0. p a O (V N N N b O Y Y a O a W HO m O OQ " cy�i; QQ O � �i�'incmin amo N ILSf RE ao 2G24 aov °� ve ao t- V nn Ir _ � n nnayaypp n G a a O p OgBi ° � � °' � IL CL IL Z no -0, It - g " O a In - ° 3 ° 7+Sn n �92- a. O� OD m a O v v v v d M 17 M l7 d a IL Q ° Q OanvrM O mnLnn U m m M n n n K M N N N N � M 1 K Z 0 (- 0 a 0 v v v v a O M M M M a 0 YYY YYY ``ff a O v w LIJU d st (7 �pj d M m �p �p d M �„ Q M j Q M n n n n K Z o, 7 O l�f 17 17 7 N In �n 1A a p N N N N wF v' Fa � � � °0 � c� . H � nmQ ) o Qo po MMM q� o pao w 1 w ( w ( w U W J Ix a m o M M d G M d G d Z M m (d0 C m H N N K K m OD m m 2 � ui Li uiw 0 0w Lu ui C9 a � � � � 0 � totoco a) 0 � MM m co 0 N O a 0 K in N n ry O N 1��1 � N c`� N O t a' Y1 w N O < 00 N °7 a w wN� w ~ Epp a w w tp V a r. ~ ~ w � v a a' N 0 1fI V N O N 8 try r cl Y 1�� O N ��pp pm N .- e- w f0 K c� N ' O 17 O C a ' O O 1 o a a - d ~ a ~ o a o N _ d 0 � � or u�i � � r, Ir o a �ix v per- aw a o v O' 0 � 1O � Ln ui 0 rNrr1R 0 " rn Z a ~ w w C7 a a w w a w w ~ O Q O_ p ~ O `' N ' I N 0 I pr ON (q�� rn i� .N.. N ' M N pp, 7� 'l _N a' .- N .- r O v I C7 fV ' vj r C •- N w w n �f � � � � r trog 1 � n 11% a w r w °' o a ~ a O ^� a I w w w O � v a w r � w v O N O Ix O ZR n IN m � iR ""' wr ~ iR ' 7R a a a a w ` aR n O ' aR O aNN aMEG ` N O O m N K $ x N I 'O a a SL ON_ m LU noQm ' �vn�pv � � NM p � n � m �i �r�pp � t� Oa cp$� a 0 w w v a a� w < p a V W O FO ' uvi �i °iNp�p�� co 0Qc19.i9m < °ppp°� �p8co 'Ou4im(� p�Q�/ ' mapr� �m N d N .N- O r O N K O M ' O V !h 1 w O � .N- O' �f N K w 7 o �- a C a U CN CO 00 to to aR _ N N to CD co a � cpi o -e a g � mo � � g �i �iTo m < ¢ I � o v `�' o a N `~� a _ 0 O O � Nn �fgf O 1O po 7� N 's m � mo � � o Or ao Pnn � � O °° $ m � � O N O � a o r° a ui Q � O � c� imoo`a LL32o 0 to c iR ma N �N a ' 7R a. N o alr- w ae a a 10 fa a pC J C CS tJgy tr C .S V� = y � � � ONi O' Q C7 = to vF�- L� V °Ni � mC7 U' I i /�- C � � �;{ C1 U' = H � NN r) afY mQ ° n � mUo `a ° a� mU . �fmUowwm 0) o a +am w catnmQ awmQ n' m mQ a' w ui 0 to2 Q CA O ' F L m S Q A O N O ILm Q O O .- N O co Q Q p r ^ (- M O N O Q N O m fV N 7R 0 m �p a o o c ' a � 08, N � � � �t a ^ a ^ ON Nn 7R OU) N a � 800 C; CL adrnrnC4 0: 'bi' a � 0 0 N a v n G o aa aCrn= 00 CD 0) .+ Oco ^.e N a n -W n O 17 N OD K Cm � n D3 ' o ,a,a�� � m o Z Oa ^ a ^ �imO � IL a ? birnm o . c O F- N Q o., n _N 2R -a N y _ $ 7R � m 7R LLI a 2S, o c) a � � b a � d, `� rn rym a � arn � O a 'O ^ 7R 0O me� � �R p ^ a � a 8 8m � a � 8o 08 Boa Ch � a W � i4Lq za ^ a ^ ^ a ^ •- A a ^ o ^ W co yy�� vv�� O a � � � $ ro a � oQno � e � a � � 25Smc a 'S 'a�' oano � o N " N Z m W N N 7R n eR N O g� N It 0 W G F-N � �O O � n O � v Oorn c000 �a a 0) 0 a aoW50, rn F- U ICO M Ow a a ^ �i �i a £i " G = m a Q N a Y � hAa ^ < " m a a ` is N n ^ ` o ^ o= Y o = `- i= n5� _ } om ntR F- � '� rny n iR r e � °° env O Q a ^ moo' a - '� bra ^ moo ^ � roa ''' o 40 y Q 0 O a mnmN p ; 0 p Oiron � DOmrNini 40 70C Cr c o `N'' N '� T °m' aa8 � o rNii+ � 0s a.. o . o � C4 Asa ^ .- .= o �N,� N � fy� to V r r CD C J ^ ^ C C J [ C J f C y = J C C ON m a f!J < �p ^ gg o W p < m m co w 117 O < cop co o � S N111C9C9 p � Y- gOOmC7C9 p � � � OfV Nv� OC9 Cn � fgbo � C7G O �m' U o � � � � `o n .p mVor ^ ^ ioa a Q m Vp ^ ooro `os D � V o ^ ^ w� SM m < }�&i a' m < a m < a m < a W M W O fj W m W p W W Q W W Q IL coca < ronCD co a � � gonmma coy � 40f- w ' aO' Q� oNwCID co ch 0 N O CL d o 0 2i8og tom 1D m �v r� mm �S �p�p� p�p�imper,p y OOOOSO N n�tO anD� V V II m Mm M N a> mCoOD Go M l7 Q 3. M V O !!QQ M .N a a�o�mZYioi A a Z3. O `. 3. N _ _ N n 1n a U M n N r M W rnmBoSio°0 �i36 3- mrnm rn rn O a = nmP-0%n Ln0) � n� M CD 0) N mm8m� a 0) o 3. 0 r�mwm w ��gsp �� 4 Epp O OI QI CD Q�W N m mo, 0m � 00000 � 0OI z p� co W O M r- CO I � m Cl) p n n Q!� a. Z o ctl rnarnrnm N mMi `O,m .� � rn�rnrn W G �p pp ory mm�y p Oi 00)0n)00)Oni a� ON1 Onl ONl Si ONi Q!0)a 0)01 H O W Onl Onl ONi Q mNm V b O 01mN.-O ^ O �n 01 O V co rna m nIn ao0) LONoao� m C to S Z yn aD M N tM� 0�Oi roo Epp m M N A p� O W M0)C, m WOO ONO W g M O�OiW AO� F Of ONi OI Obi N r �n pm 0 ^ p ib Q 01 W Oni� m �0�nO1 p0p N� v i O �Mn Epp r W � ION � o O O/8 W 01 a 01 Oi 0i 0 OD 30 m v v = C C dc C C 8tp 8�pcli QQ�p In 4D _ BmpQ ydj mo C T W 0I 01� 0 q a OOW W OI� 0 a ; u)01010i� O,S Y Ol Qi 0101� 0� m w Ca m a m 5 M tea' CL m 0 n p i Q O `o �NMV'h , �NMV'N LLl ,N17 CL V'1n W M O N O .0 a N a aLn 0 " 0 N V $ G a � � ar a m tojL IL cr A � O_ N ` ^ N ar. a O Zas 0 M Q 0 r (L W O � NMR'im � � � � � Oo u� aococN m o O a $' rno mrn o � � � a8 aiQw '�r' � � � Z to W � nn rmNN n p c� q� r < � � L 2 a rnrnrn $ mm - a '�' b; No � � n W fA a p 8i ONi aNl Ori ONi N a On 01 0) Cl) OD O co l7 N F- p � rnmrq rnvM rnrNv � w OQo u ggm ggi� n �n � cY rnmrnrnv rnmS � � o � a `$ `aa � CO-0md25 � G a .. O 'O � �i v mu� n $ �imrriM 0) S 110 wIL y ' O �p n o�p ODf7 N O! v r co N iR DOOMS` "+ p� N aD yr Epp 0� l9 d Vp {D W a w AM .�- •�- Q to IL Oi O� OI Q K g v°ii pp rgire0) as 0 oN °pm a0v O v� °r° ZSm iti mmn 9L C 4 Y C ID to UC J £ C I C J C C � Ua c8 - 0 Imcf = Uo b FaoN� m U nm � g o rnrn . oE a LLI w 0 to � Y � Nmvinmr yl d co � d ri ¢ y � N � v �mm � mao � : Fa r cq O O O co 0 fV O d o 0 a ,r, ' 2525og o0 ^ g '�m' Din IrLf) � $ N $ mbi � Ln � �ppm Lnremmmm � � _n gg u� rornSiR .. N a0' � �i 7nOSSSoON $ erg w � '9n' r$' coc3 � N °'• co c a � moo " (L w W0) 0 N a ao ' ` '-' com N90 QN NM N rn M�n �n NN 0 $ 7R u O ` p p � rn � �nmm � rnmm � �n � �R p - a Dorm ry rLnr 7R z O40 r VG r Q� QQ m N N N m 0 7 17 m N (D �T ^ qy1 m N W a � o� rnFurn �iQg � � � m VR) om a � � m mmmmo ', rnmo Fj � mOv O m r �nm rnr more r mr mmRi"� y � m f- °� a0 am) � 8 � � 8 ; � o a � m � 0 0 0 1� W F.- m N m N < 0 O m N g m N N aR CDr' O E ZR a S mrn o � �irnd gam : � � mroSi a gSwBm `�' rnf3S � rn � R z z Cl) 1 4)W ca rn pa $erco rnr d°ni bZ a Wn CO O N r r m CO N §! So QaOf R ' rnN ^N Or O N a8M 0) rn a O o C a $ Ln ( 0 � pN0 N ' ND) a oM C,) IQ C4 a ''8 � rna 7r dgrnO � � � o � `v� _ co O � rn $ `� rrnrna � gO 'm' c� � ^m' o .rm ao a e N mr a mmNrn � I�` 'N $ oN � m cozornrnQQrnrn Q aommvd� ya�i rn8ibo�i $n, � �mrr�, H2yQi rt�R �j M i0 Q � OQ �+ Mrrrimmm � i = Og m r 02fi0) rngo rn N M � q Jmrn rn rnrmmm mN" � Nmm _'mniR 0) IL CL c L C J C C 10 J pp O v ro ScC O Q t? V N O a N c'1 N A m » — m Q m a fl m Q Y a' W J W W J Y < oi < o � Nmvv� mrmrn � � � 9 F � < Y Nma00rnma � ,^ � Qa ►- r 0 0 o , N O a N Z LL N n at�R w r � aDD 45t DD W Q j 2R 2R 7R �R ude �R 2R 2R tippR� t�pR ��y 2e �epR� 2Q cps 2Q �pp�� D� 7OR 7R 2R 2pR� tp� 1y� 2R v g * * * e 0 z J b M CMD Ol < lV m Y N 1� CCD N t7 tN0 M b N f� m ?i tD 4! aMO, 1`Y T Of O� aD W z W o r m . r N W Y y) (V N M M t7 t4 V a Q O Y Y Y 7 < R < O < C V t7 17 M Y AD i''1. M M "f M M M M W ? 0 Oz < W a ao� aa ' w m Y V V V V Z > J d W l7 J M N (NO m mNrp7 pb q r q O F J Y 2 N tN0 c0 N t0 fD ID n m A 0 w 0 Qi a � ONE � Ol (b m m Ol OD W % b b b a z 0 W t w N N om {tpD 1f7 O1 tD O r 1n ty0� 8 t0 r O M N Y �Np m» 10 1p M M r N (My iA r O W U N > F t0 1�] Q m Lrr,) Y N m Ol O t O N 00� m b m m 40 O �lp� .- Oo�1 N O ��y m O O V p z M M ^Q m to f:a0 m m O+ Ot N N N fV N N N N N N N N N N N t` O Y m .- fV .- e- _ Y ~ ULL 0 � '� < b trOraO mo N� "g' v0 t, mm NgM gV r NM to r W m2 w0 It vei � me % rnmA � t�'4r n °DL toOT W rrrr � rI- ($ mmwmm m � mBi0tmot rnw oop o U pp� (0 mp8 p O = 12 z to C •O- N tC) n m O w n ON O 1n (0 S n A (NV ORi t� (D O h O�8 Grp (+per tray N pep pN� O LL r t0 v v{ f• N .- M to (D (0 V fA 1.� q Cl W yto r mttitdto teL6V V V<`tt 'C1 L6el0tD tdee0t-r0Dtortdtzr «irrrtltl- r zpp� t(� N O N � O My t0 m N �.7 O m n R 0 Obi T j G t- 0 lV Y N M 10 m R m � m (O m A O b Qi N Cq mMv6rn (d m ci m rnC � 1 t`i " oi T6 ufv r 11: Ld ( vv to vv147 Q m .- .- W tQ- > �m uNn (r hm 8 °N a�g � � ov4r90 O J ¢ J N N �n w cd S o < i m (O � * m etO nZ o10 � N NV fN N N N N NNW N (.t oM < 1f1 10 r m Ol Epp N M to r t(p� Ol pp, N 1p7� pV� p0�~ t0MQZ } ObO � 0 m m m m 0 mm m 0 mOf m W W � S Oi Omi Oi � W OI Oi Qi O+ � � � gN (V N U I I I f W U H N G -' � 88S � R � S8gWt�((Z77y8ydydy �f�pZ � BWSS qB8tnS �S O= O W `? 7 r m (O b N N N m O µ 7 W N O m R tN7 N N b O N In a(q v N U Q Q •r N m m S m O •- m Y �- N M Y W r CD Ol O .- N V wNMV tntonmm 8a `o m w E o T $ o o o 0 0 0 0 o p m �mt o� x. y w m jD m Y N M �P b (0 v� co a, C c t0 C Q Q C tl C 0 p ':3CL o mrMi (nv (mS morntu(pp9i ("oc�q E � mitt-- CDt�i (btmtb- tm- r`V'� "O�i (roI 2 > � N � tL1 .- O N ? N O N v�_S VT 4 �O � M D O t0 (D Ot (b`/ Co N tf� Y b N g O u o Q m LL aim v !t oR x m s ; v ` c m N .- W .- N M < b tD r m a! p .0.. � $ V N } Y N M v to t0 r a0 O) r. E co LL } .0.. C 2 2 .2 � .0. .O. .0.. p � U. M MY NMotntormrn � � to E LL th O N O fZ N O O �-' n tpnpp Grp 1" N �J VN �pn mN 1n mN l�1 Q lA D� di Oi 0) r r0„ Q " m Ql 17 O Q� n ry nxomp rr » sn 2R N7R Y N N 0 0 N !o Or .- M A n iR O S pp n pp m $' `- n rnrn `.SAS ' < � eq M (7 a0 w - u m S Og 10 r O a v 'Nrlrn I-- o Nn & * N r n rl mN V 7 HpmOf mO mprn t7 O Q � cc n 0 i. r) l7 c7 Y 1f7 N CPO f V fmV V �p 1p� �{ CD J Ol Oni O W a am008, o aC20 In � Y N - m Q�pp imp {p �tpp 7 O�1 Ol Q�l O�f ON1 lD OI d7 ti N � O1 � f7 �+I m jp lD v 1fJ 40 N - f9 N LU cc W N N Q Q o W W n y p� N n OD V1 m 2 s � No OR rn w W � O m `tO � uN] °D � � imp N m ` N Ifl v 1(7 N r (14 P1 N NV , r1 v N t0 8 �p N is O) �p 17 g imp 10 t0 n fV N OLoni W ONi a�p Qni m01 q00 1� tON C 0 Ol �j IA 1vO V 1� N .• N % N N N 0. O 0) 0) Ol 0 m im m ONi cn0 tom m n n N r) O d NN 0) (V l0 f0 N Y ^ N U �• a a a vninrrm- min E gr nrvm_ rn o) 25m2Krnm mmn mnmm oV) CL A $ F1 p� p ID r Q Ql w n N h COD /1 a P n N N fD fnN N [Y ems- fV N N z• m � �immmnnNnnnloig c W � oto ro 10 s- Q O r N Q -1 < O N N m rl W m m m 0 N � Q a ]�[ r N f7 v N m n m O) �- .- f"• ` G Q r � r , , 1 , � ' � , N p o F Y ][ YY mnn W o f 4 P7 O N O •Q � 2. Factor 2 -Average Pupil Change by Grade Level This factor is the average change at each grade level over the 13 or 6-year period. 3. Factor 3—Auburn School District Kindergarten Enrollment as a Function of King County Live Births. This factor calculates what percent each kindergarten class was of the King County live births in the 5 previous years. From this information has been extrapolated the kindergarten pupils expected for the next 4 years. Table 3 —This set of tables, found on pages 5 through 13 utilizes the above mentioned variables and generates several projections. ❑ Table 3.13 (pg 5)—shows a projection based on the 13-year average gain in kindergarten (Factor 2) and the 13-year average change between grade levels (Factor 1). The data is shown for the district as a whole. ❑ Table 3.6 (pg 5)— shows a projection using the same scheme as Table 3.13 except it shortens the historical to only the most recent 6 years. ❑ Table 3.13A and 3.6A (pg 6)—uses the same factors above except Factor 3 is substituted for Factor 2. The kindergarten rates are derived from the King County live births instead of the average gain. ❑ Tables 3E.13, 3E.6, 3E.13A, 3E.6A (pg 7)—breaks out the K-5 grades from the district projection. Summary level data is provided for percentage gain and pupil gain by grade articulation. ❑ Tables 3M.13, 3M.6, 3M.13A, 3M.6A (pg 8)—breaks out the 6-8 grades from the district projection. Summary level data is provided for percentage gain and pupil gain by grade articulation. ❑ Tables 3SH.13, 3SH.6, 3SH.13A, 3SH.6A (pg 9)—breaks out the 9-12 grades from the district projection. Summary level data is provided for percentage gain and pupil gain by grade articulation. ❑ Table 4 (pg 10)— Collects the four projection models by grade group for ease of comparison. ❑ Table 5 (pgs 11-13)—shows how well each projection model performed when compared with actual enrollments. Data is provided in both number and percent formats for the past 13 years. 2 Auburn School District #408 Student Enrollment Projections October 2002 Introduction The projective techniques give some consideration to historical and current data as a basis for forecasting the future. In addition, the `projector' must make certain assumptions about the operant variables within the data being used. These assumptions are "judgmental"by definition. Forecasting can be defined as the extrapolation or logical extension from history to the future, or from the known to the unknown. The attached tabular data reviews the history of student enrollment, sets out some quantitative assumptions, and provides projections based on these numerical factors. The projection logic does not attempt to weigh the individual sociological, psychological, economic, and political factors that are present in any demographic analysis and projection. The logic embraces the assumptions that whatever these individual factors have been in the past are present today, and will be in the future. It further moderates the impact of singular factors by averaging data over thirteen years and six years respectively. The results provide a trend, which reflects a long(13 year) and a short(6 year)base from which to extrapolate. Two methods of estimating the number of kindergarten students have been used. The first uses the average increase over the past 13 and 6-year time frame and adds it to each succeeding year. The second derives what the average percentage Auburn kindergartners have been of the live births in King County for the past 5 years and uses this to project the subsequent four years. The degree to which the actuals deviate from the projections can only be measured after the fact. This deviation provides a point of departure to evaluate the effectiveness of the assumptions and logic being used to calculate future projections. Monitoring deviation is critical to the viability and credibility of the projections derived by these techniques. Tables Table 1 —Thirteen Year History of October 1 Enrollments—page 3 The data shown in this table is the baseline information used to project future enrollment. This data shows the past record of enrollment in the district on October 1 of each year. Table 2—Historical Factors Used in Projections -page 4 This table shows the three basic factors derived from the data in Table 1. These factors have been used in the subsequent projections. The three factors are: 1. Factor 1 —Average Pupil Change Between Grade Levels This factor is sometimes referred to as the"holding power" or"cohort survival." It is a measure of the number of pupils gained or lost as they move from one grade level to the next. 1 Appendix A.1 - Student Enrollment Projections 4/29/2003 Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2003 through 2009 Section VIII Appendix Appendix A.1 - Student Enrollment Projections Appendix A.2 - CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Enrollment Projections Appendix A.3 - Student Generation Survey 4/29/2003 ppO �Oy� pp O b p p OJ 1� n EOp t �p 't a0 N Ol ZR N S i O N �cOj IT 1 W Of O .�- CD W) N v O O fM N It N a 0 0 N b < M � Ml a T r J r< W/7 a CIJNw O p 0 � LL O on O.0 C O CO N l A T N 10 9 a a O O yW) a a r 6 17 17 r 'O f W. pn 0 o pp pp Tco F OI �O O m CD N OD m 7 V Go Go � O O) ?R 0 w u� Op Cf W N 8 v COO 1 O a W Y o 0 r0 N T a v " 7 O .�- N a uT-, W a .m. O Y7 V! � T G O 19 M a 60 J Q 69 S N 19 NCN a T OLI n O W ?R 00O_ O OCD r rOVr03 o pp u OD eT T bo v � c Z rn rn Q O Q LL U CD ry p r CND_ a p N p p Cop N COO o � c o f Vl 0 0 o of 0 " 1 0 c o v m o a G o a s J O O N a CO n a a N u O p p� O 1(1 a O O yp a M a Z w 0 Z � T T W d C u N W H I... L 0 J CO a U Q pp pp�� O N n O a LL F N O N T CD ?R {00 Ol q u V! p W N N O N J S $ 0 U9 O C m '02 v�i 0i c D a m rq oLf) o n v a Ch f9 w N 3 F N w Y 0 0 N I Ln 2 0 0 ^ N R O Nf9 a O TM a U Q Q H Q U N n co f7 lfi n lfl l(1 11 w m O O n 0 N C r U a l0 C'I CD N CAD_ Q 2 A A r N m a A eNi ONi Q p a VA ti LL U. U H Y c O' mm w d �, HE $ L?' aw W NID w '0 C � Vw? O w L O) O ONV p u O C d s � U) m R s s � m Y U a m s CD c 9 0 9mg C m mca E N m Q N C m p�p S p m mp 9 S a w C O -� O 7 a t m T W -a « O C .� C U. LL m a 1p ' O O �M m Q [T O EE y N N 0 ORU NO N COLLD v r m w E = W uric m8 a: C43 m > ; � o cn ¢ <n w Q m o Q w U) co (n a LL rt LL U � U U v .. m m m m = m b S w L m v � � � Z, m °s 8 8ALL � m2o > r yak FE mo pR V E U a LL LL LL LL O, a C ¢ > O C Q J 3 a W ~ N $ $ ¢ � o cnNu_�i b a ?R ?R WaaJ a N Z Z h F a) dl a rail CD2 2 0 0 h � W m } ) k 21 % E oL - / / } t ■ ° ° ƒ k ° \ 2} �} � k� j§ !� ■ ) U) § z � ` � � / � 94 0 d j \ 04 M � � % IL ■ 2 ¥ is e J � § R uj , _ COM ; ° . ! ! 2 - m / \ � 4 , a § 0 3 f & = % k ' | ( mom 4 f � ` ` fw69 k ■ a k k LL Co ) ) g § a wk ! D > 2 ff ! ° ¥ ! � 0 m f ; J J k � | < < 22 L § k } k ( k \ ^ LL | a » � § » * » q t � ! # k � - k ) � � 0L. I ° ate ■ L LL C £ LL LL ) AI . - > .C - 3 ° � 2 ka � © ° ` L ) Rk | ` 2f } 4n § ) 0 ! 2 ƒ ° 2 w w0, � � � CY N N T !! T T T p O It W n Q O LL LL ODQ Cb N ' p O p O a A O O % r U ^' °i O U H f9 F U LL 0 0 4 U _ T T T T N i ppNN pp NNL � Mh O LL A�D O NtV�l rLLG O en 0 Omp (7 CV ?It G c r r y fA W M y y W T T T T Q $ N 0 0 N 0 Q O N a O N O LL 0 0 0 LL 0 0 0 y Q°0 II0 O � O00ff O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 j 0 0 0 0 0 0 LL LL LL LL m C Z _T iD m m Q c m m u C L i mp o c� m Epp c5 0 �rnp p m J O LL N � 00 V LL N m � `m O LL N co W m LL N b co It a t9 m M 1 .- LL (7 m m C U O O7 (9 o to O Ol 00 0 0 O C 0 0 0 m 00 0 0 0 0 0 Z W $ v m v COcy $ o cn v to N ~ � o y $ U J ' O a U 8 Q rr7 Q lac Q LL li U {L 47 ' O W y N cn m a IT IIT � b � CDD (0 OOD h J $ ? N LL U $ W o a c $i �i W o Fb o 0 0 o a $ ut°i ZtR ~ LL Q W c O m CCL V y v y I Z M LL a C F y x N � UQa a ti � '� W OD Fa- $ rn �i MN gm or 'C x y LL. yLLLL LL in LL O It: "° � � i � W " y $ o p o 2 v o co N W o Z x o o O x oo $ 8 rn 19 � y o o N 2' vi p p o Q y $ x atOD aD m Q m .�.. N Ln o y y O O Op Z y O 19 O9 O 8G �` i v It IT N au ° �- N V Z 8 V $ $ O �' LL U 7 � d C a c U Q U LL N OD x m win es W G LL W 69 LL c� ® fOID N 0 x0 O c W U ° n U U U LAJ u in � N $ E m $ E w V00 FQ v LL LL Y LL ~ a y u a v V = 3 v_ O m t4 r Q of t r 0 3 rn Y t L 16 Y u t E U E #F � a E N in a E ° U) S C a F� S W a y a y W O LL W (n d LL W L y 1-u LL W N y LL W M mi N al Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2003 through 2009 Section VII 0 Impact Fees 4/29/2003 Auburn School District No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2003 through 2009 CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN This committee recommended the board place the high school on the ballot for the fifth time in February 2003. The February election approved the new high school at 68.71% yes votes The school is schedule to open in the Fall of 2005. The table below illustrates the current capital construction plan for the next six years The exact timelines are wholly dependent on the rate of growth in the school age population. 2001-08 Capital Construction Plan March 2003 Funded Projected Fund Project Timelines Project as of Cost Source Mar-03 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 All Facilities Yes $37,268,354 1996 XX Modernization Bonds All Facilities- 1998 Technology Yes $8,000,000 6 Year XX XX XX Modernization Cap Lev Impact Portables Yes $700,000 Fees XX XX XX XX 1/ Property Purchase Surplus New Elementary Yes $2,800,000 Property XX School Sale 1/ Property Purchase New Middle No $5,000,000 XX School 1/ Elementary#13 No $15,600,000 XX XX XX plan const open 1/ Elementary#14 No $16,875,000 XX plan 1/ Middle School #5 No $30,000,000 XX plan Bond 1/ New Sr. High Yes $58,500,000 Impact XX XX XX XX Fees plan const const open 11 These funds may be secured through local bond issues, sale of real property, impact fees, and state matching funds The District currently is not eligible for state assistance at the elementary school level. 20 4/29/2003 Aubum School District No.408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2003 CONSTRU CONSTRUCTION 2009 CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN The formal process used by the Board to address current and future facility needs began in 1974 with the formation of a community wide citizens committee. The result of this committee's work was published in the document titled 'Guidelines for Development ' In 1985 the Board formed a second Ad Hoc citizens committee to pick up from the work of the first and address the needs of the District for subsequent years The work of this committee was published in the document titled 'Directions for the Nineties.' In 1995 the Board commissioned a third Ad Hoc citizens committee to make recommendations for Improvements to the District's programs and physical facilities. The committee recommendations are published in the document titled 'Education Into The Twenty-First Century--A Community Involved.' The 1995 Ad Hoc committee recommended the District develop plans for the Implementation, funding, and deployment of technology throughout the District's programs. The 1996 Bond proposition provided funding to enhance the capacity of each facility to accommodate technological applications. The 1998 Capital Levy provided funding to further deploy technology at a level sufficient to support program requirements in every classroom and department. In addition to the technology needs of the District the Ad Hoc committee recognized the District must prepare for continued student enrollment growth. As stated in their report, "the District must pursue an appropriate high school site as soon as possible" The Ad Hoc recommendation included commentary that the financing should be timed to maintain consistent rates of assessment. A proposition was approved by the voters on April 28, 1998 that is providing$8,000,000 over six years to address some of the technology needs of the District, and $5,000,000 to provide funds to acquire school sites. During the 1997-98 school year a Joint District Citizen's Ad Hoc Committee was appointed by the Auburn and Dieringer School Boards to make recommendations on how best to serve the school population that will come from an area that includes a large development known as Lakeland South. Lakeland South is immediately adjacent to the southern boundary of the Auburn School District. On June 16, 1998 the Ad Hoc Committee presented its recommendation at a joint meeting of the Auburn and Dieringer Boards of Directors. On June 22, 1998 the Auburn School Board adopted Resolution No 933 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries of the District in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. On June 23, 1998 the Dieringer School Board adopted a companion Resolution No. 24-97-98 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation These actions resulted in the transfer of an area from Dieringer to Auburn containing most of the Lakeland South development and certain other undeveloped properties Development in this area is progressing at an aggressive rate. The District is projecting an additional 1227 students within the six year period including the Lakeland area. This increase requires the construction of a new high school, a new elementary school, and the acquisition of a new middle school site during the six year window. A new middle school and an additional elementary school are anticipated just beyond the six year time frame for this plan. In April of 2002, the Board formed a fifth citizen's Ad Hoc committee to address the following two items and make recommendations to the board in the fall of 2002: a. A review of the conclusion and recommendations of 1985 and 1995 Ad Hoc Committees related to accommodating high school enrollment growth. This includes the review of possible financing plans for new facilities. b. Develop recommendations for accommodating high school enrollment growth for the next 10 years if a new senior high school is not built. 19 4/29/2003 Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2003 through 2009 Section A Capital Construction Plan 4/2912003 Auburn School District No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2003 through 2009 PUPIL CAPACITY While the Auburn School District uses the SPI inventory of permanent facilities as the data from which to determine space needs, the District's educational program requires more space than that provided for under the formula. This additional square footage is converted to numbers of pupils in Section III, Standard of Service The District's capacity is adjusted to reflect the need for additional space to house its programs. Changes In the capacity of the district recognize new unfunded facilities and the elimination of the facility that formerly housed the Alternative Jr. High. The combined effect of these adjustments is shown on Line B in Tables V.1 and V.2 below. Table V 1 shows the Distict's capacity with relocatable units included and Table V.2 without these units. Table VA Capacity WITH relocatables 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 A. SPI Capacity 14,647 14,647 14,647 14,647 16,147 16,797 16,797 1/ A 1 SPI Capacity-New Elem 650 A 2 SPI Capacity-New Sr High 1,500 B. Capacity Adjustments (1,854) (1,764) (1,471) (1,222) (1,510) (1,750) (1,750) C Net Capacity 12,793 12,883 13,176 14,925 15,287 15,047 15,047 D. ASD Enrollment 13,427 13,807 14,214 14,391 14,352 14,501 14,654 3l E. ASD Surplus/Deficit (634) (925) (1,039) 533 935 546 393 CAPACITY ADJUSTMENTS Exclude Aft JH (40) (40) (40) (40) (40) (40) (40) Include Relocatable 1,672 1,762 2,055 2,175 1,988 1,748 1,748 2/ Exclude SOS(pq 12) (3,486) (3,486) (3,486) (3,357) (3,458) (3,458) (31458) Total Adjustmts (1,854) (1,764) (1,471) (1,222) (1,510) (1,750) (1,7_5 en Table V.2 Capacity WITHOUT relocatables 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 A SPI Capacity 14,647 14,647 14,647 14,647 16,147 16,797 16,797 1/ A 1 SPI Capacity-New Elem 650 1/ A 2 SPI Capacity-New Sr. High 1,500 B Capacity Adjustments (3,526) (3,526) (3,526) (3,397) (3,498) (3,498) (3,498) C Net Capacity 11,121 11,121 11,121 12,750 13,299 13,299 13,299 D ASD Enrollment 13,427 13,807 14,214 14,391 14,352 14,501 14,654 E. ASD Surplus/Deficlt (2,306) (2,687) (3,094) (1,642) (1,053) (1,202) (1,355) CAPACITY ADJUSTMENTS Exclude AR JH (40) (40) (40) (40) (40) (40) (40) 2/ Exclude SOS (pg 12) (3,486) (3,486) (3,486) (3,357) (3,458) (3,458) (3,458) Total Adjustments (3,526) (3,526) (3,526) (3,397) (3,498) (3,498) (3,498) 1/ New facilities shown in 2006-07 are not funded under the current Capital Facilities Plan 2/The Standard of Service represents 24%of SPI capacity. When new facilities are added the Standard of Service computations are decreased to 21%of SPI capacity 3/ Students beyond the capacity are accomodated in non-classroom spaces(commons, library,theater) as well as rented space which violates the District's standard of service. 4/29/2003 1 T Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2003 through 2009 Section V Pupil Capacity 4129/2003 Aubum School District No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN through 2009 INVENTORY Of FACILITIES TABLE I TEMPORARY/RELOCATABLE IV.2 FACILITIES INVENTORY (March 2003) Elementary Location 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 Washington 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Terminal Park 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Dick Scobee 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Pioneer 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Chinook 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Lea Hill 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Gildo Rey 6 6 8 8 10 10 10 Ever Heights 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Alpac 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Lake View 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Hazelwood 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ilalko 3 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 3 TOTAL UNITS 28 28 30 30 32 32 32 TOTAL CAPACITY 742 742 795 795 848 848 848 Middle School Location 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 Cascade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Olympic 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Rainier 5 5 5 7 7 7 7 Mt. Baker 2 2 4 6 7 7 7 TOTAL UNITS 7 7 9 13 14 14 14 TOTAL CAPACITY 210 1 210 270 390 420 420 420 Sr. High School Location 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 West Auburn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Auburn 12 12 15 15 12 8 8 Auburn Riverside 12 15 18 18 12 8 8 TOTAL UNITS 24 27 33 33 24 16 16 TOTAL CAPACITY 720 610 990 990 720 480 480 COMBINED TOTAL UNITS 59 62 72 76 70 62 62 COMBINED TOTAL CAPACITY 1,672 1,762 2,055 2,175 11988 1,748 1,748 4/29/2003 15 Auburn School District No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2003 through 2009 INVENTORY OF FACILITIES Table IVA shows the current inventory of permanent district facilities and their SPI rated capacities. Table IV.2 shows the number and location of each relocatable unit by school The district uses relocatable facilities to: 1) provide Interim housing in school attendance areas uniquely impacted by increasing school populations that would otherwise require continual redistricting, 2) make space available for changing program requirements and offerings determined by unique student needs, and 3) provide housing to cover our needs until permanent facilities can be financed and constructed. Relocatable facilities are deemed to be interim, stop gap measures that often place undesirable stress on the existing physical plants. Core facilities, (i a gymnasiums, restrooms, kitchens, labs, lockers, libraries, etc.)are not of sufficient size or quantity to handle the increased school population served by adding relocatable classrooms. TABLE PERMANENT FACILITIES IVA @ SPI Rated Capacity (January 2002) A. Elementary Schools Budding 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 Washington 553 553 553 553 553 553 553 Terminal Park 441 441 441 441 441 441 441 Dick Scobee 618 618 618 618 618 618 618 Pioneer 449 449 449 449 449 449 449 Chinook 552 552 552 552 552 552 552 Lea Hill 498 498 498 498 498 498 498 Gddo Rey 596 596 596 596 596 596 596 Ever Heights 512 512 512 512 512 512 512 Alpac 554 554 554 554 554 554 554 Lake View 685 685 685 685 685 685 685 Hazelwood 639 639 639 639 639 639 639 Ilalko 1 648 1 648 1 648 1 648 1 648 1 648 1 648 ELEM CAPACITY 1 6,745 j 6,745 1 6,745 1 6,745 1 6,745 1 6,745 1 6,745 B. Middle Schools Building 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 Cascade 897 897 897 897 897 897 897 Olympic 960 960 960 960 960 960 960 Alternative JH 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 Rainier 902 902 902 902 902 902 902 Mt Baker 1 903 903 1 903 1 903 903 903 1 903 MS CAPACITY 3,702 3,702 3,702 3,702 3,702 3,702 3,702 C. Senior High Schools Building 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 West Auburn 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 Auburn 2,447 2,447 2,447 2,447 2,447 2,447 2,447 Auburn Riverside 1,503 1,503 1,503 1,503 1,503 1,503 1,503 SH CAPACITY 4,200 4,200 4,200 4,200 4,200 4,200 4,200 COMB'D CAPACITY 14,647 14,647 14,647 14,647 14,641 14,647 14,647 101 4/29/2003 14 • Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2003 through 2009 Section IV Inventory of Facilities 4/29/2003 Aubum School District No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2003through 2009 STANDARD OF SERVICE ROOM UTILIZATION The Auburn School District provides a comprehensive high school program that Includes numerous elective options in special Interest areas. Facilities to accommodate special interest activities are not amenable to standard classroom usage. The district averages 90% utilization of all available teaching stations. SPI Report#3 dated 10/23/01 identifies 150 teaching stations available in the senior high facilities. The utilization pattern results In a loss of approximately 15 teaching stations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 15 rooms @ 30 each= (450) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (460) STANDARD OF SERVICE COMPUTED TOTALS ELEMENTARY Loss of Permanent Capacity= (1,617) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (1,617) MIDDLE SCHOOL Loss of Permanent Capacity= (480) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (480) SENIOR HIGH Loss of Permanent Capacity= (1,390) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (1,390) TOTAL Loss of Permanent Capacity= (3,486) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (3,486) 4/29/2003 12 Aubum School District No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2003through 2009 STANDARD OF SERVICE SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS SENIOR HIGH COMPUTER LABS The Auburn School District operates two computer labs at each of the senior high schools. This program utilizes two standard classrooms at comprehensive high schools and one at West Auburn. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 5 rooms @ 30 each = (150) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each= 0 Total Capacity Loss (150) ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at both comprehensive high schools for students learning English as a second language. This program requires four standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 30 each= (120) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each= 0 Total Capacity Loss (120) STRUCTURED LEARNING PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates three structured learning classrooms for 33 students moth profound disabilities The housing requirements for this program are provided in the SPI space guidelines SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program at the senior high level for special education students requiring instruction to address their specific learning disabilities. The current senior high school program requires fifteen classrooms to provide for approximately 400 students. The SPI space guidelines provide for one of the thirteen teaching stations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 14 rooms @ 30 each = (420) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (420) PERFORMING ARTS CENTERS Auburn High School includes 25,000 square feet used exclusively for a Performing Arts Center The SPI Inventory includes this space when computing unhoused student capacity. This space was not intended for nor is it usable for classroom instruction. It was constructed to provide a community center for the performing arts. Using SPI capacity guidelines, 25,000 square feet computes to 208 unhoused students or 8 33 classrooms. Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 33 rooms @ 30 each = (250) 4/29/2003 11 Aubum School Disfiol No.408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2003through 2009 STANDARD OF SERVICE MIDDLE SCHOOLS STRUCTURED LEARNING SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates two structured learning programs at the middle school level for students with profound disabilities. The housing requirements for this program are provided in the SPI space allocations. ACCESS SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District provided a transition program for students with behavioral disorders. The program is housed at one of the middle schools and uses one classroom The housing requirements for this program are provided in the SPI space allocations. SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program for each grade at the middle school level. This is to accommodate special education students needing remedial instruction to address their specific disabilities. Three classrooms per school (twelve total) are required to provide for approximately 250 students. The housing requirements for this program are not entirely provided for in the SPI space guidelines. MIDDLE SCHOOL COMPUTER LABS The Auburn School District operates a minumum of one computer lab at each middle school This program utilizes a standard classroom per middle school. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 30 each = (120) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each= 0 Total Capacity Loss (120) ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at the middle school level for students learning English as a second language This program requires four standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines, Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 30 each = (120) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each= 0 Total Capacity Loss (120) ROOM UTILIZATION The Auburn School District provides a comprehensive middle school program that includes elective options in special interest areas Facilities to accommodate special interest activities are not amenable to standard classroom usage. The district averages 95% utilization of all available teaching stations SPI Report#3 dated 10/23/01 identifies 158 teaching stations available in the mid-level facilities The utilization pattern results in a loss of approximately 8 teaching stations Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 rooms @ 30 each= (240) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each= 0 Total Capacity Loss (240) 4/29/2003 10 Aubum Scholl District No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2003 through 2009 STANDARD OF SERVICE READING LABS The Auburn School District operates a program for students needing remediation and additional language arts instruction. These programs utilize non-standard classroom spaces if available in each elementary school. Four elementary schools do not have non-standard rooms available, thus they are housed in a standard classroom The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 26.5 each = (106) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26 5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (106) MUSIC ROOMS The district elementary music programs require one acoustically modified classroom at each elementary school for music instruction. The housing requirements are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 12 rooms @ 26 5 each = (318) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26 5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (318) ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at the elementary school level for students learning English as a second language. This program requires eleven standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 11 rooms @ 26 5 each = (292) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26 5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (292) SECOND GRADE TOSA PROGRAM The Auburn School District provides a TOSA reading specialist program for eight highly impacted elementary schools This pullout model provides direct instruction to students who are not at grade level and do not receive other services. This program requires eight standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 rooms @ 26.5 each = (212) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26 5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (212) ELEMENTARY LEARNING SPECIALIST PROGRAM The Auburn School District provides a learning specialist program to increase literacy skills for first and second graders This program model has been created from the 1-728 funds and currently has the specialist going into existing teacher classrooms, as well as pulling out students into designated classrooms. The district is utilizing classrooms at eight of the twleve elementary schools. Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 rooms @ 26.5 each= (212) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each= 0 Total Capacity Loss (212) 4/29/2003 9 Auburn School Distract No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2003 through 2009 STANDARD OF SERVICE SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program at the elementary level for special education students requiring instruction to address their specific disabilities. Thirteen standard classrooms are required to house this program.The housing requirements for this program exceed the SPI space guidelines by six standard classrooms. The loss of capacity is expected as growth in program is larger than the total elementary population Loss of Permanent Capacity 6 rooms @ 26.5 each = (159) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (159) NATIVE AMERICAN RESOURCE ROOM The Auburn School District operates one resource room to support the education of Native American students at the elementary level. One standard classroom is fully dedicated to serve these students. Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 room @ 26.5 each = (27) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (27) HEAD START The Auburn School District operates a Head Start program for approximately 108 youngsters in six sections of 112 day in length. The program is housed at Evergreen Heights Elementary School and utilizes three standard elementary classrooms and auxiliary office space. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Lass of Permanent Capacity 3 rooms @ 26 5 each= (80) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (80) EARLY CHILDHOOD SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates a pre-school program for handicapped youngsters below age five This program is housed at eight different elementary schools and currently uses eight standard classrooms. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 rooms @ 26.5 each = (212) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each= 0 Total Capacity Loss (212) 4/2912003 8 Auburn School District No 4W CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2003through 2009 STANDARD OF SERVICE The School impact Fee Ordinances adopted by King County and the City of Auburn indicate that each school district must establish a "Standard of Service"in order to ascertain the overall capacity to house its projected student population. The Superintendent of Public instruction establishes square footage "capacity"guidelines for computing state funding support. The fundamental purpose of the SPI guidelines is to provide a vehicle to equitably distribute state matching funds for school construction projects By default these guidelines have been used to benchmark the district's capacity to house its student population. The SPI guidelines do not make adequate provision for local district program needs, facility configurations, emerging educational reform, or the dynamics of each student's educational program. The Auburn School District Standard of Service addresses those local considerations that require space in excess of the SPI guidelines. The effect on the space requirements for both permanent and relocatable facilities is shown below for each grade articulation pattern. Conditions that may result in potential space needs are provided for information purposes without accompanying computations OVERVIEW The Auburn School District operates twelve elementary schools housing 5,741 students in grades K through 5. The 905 Kindergarten students attend 112 days throughout the year Grades 1 through 5 attend on a full day basis. When converted to a full time equivalence the K-5 enrollment is 5,289 Four middle schools house 3,151 students in grades 6 through 8 The District operates two comprehensive senior high schools and one alternative high school housing 4,535 students in grades 9 through 12. CLASS SIZE The number of pupils per classroom determines the number of classrooms required to house the student population Class sizes are subject to collective bargaining. Changes to class size agreements can have significant impact on available space The current pupil/teacher limit across all elementary programs is an average of 26.5 students per teacher. Consistent with this staffing limit, room capacities are set at 26 5 students per room at grades K-5. At grades 6- 12 the limit is set at 30 pupils per room The SPI space allocation for each grade articulation level, less the computed reduction for the Auburn School District Standard of Service, determines the District's capacity to house projected pupil populations. These reductions are shown below by grade articulation level. ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS STRUCTURED LEARNING AND DEVELOPMENTALLY DELAYED SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates a structured learning program for handicapped students at the elementary school level which currently uses nine classrooms to provide for 70 students. The housing requirements for this program are provided for in the SPi space guidelines. No loss of capacity is expected unless handicapped population groves at a disproportionate rate compared to total elementary population. 4/29/2003 7 Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2003 through 2009 Section III Standard of Service 4/M2003 Aubum School District No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2 through C ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS The Auburn School District uses a modified cohort survival model to project future enrollment for all of the District's operations. Table 11.1 is an extract from the comprehensive projection model found in Appendix A.2 titled "CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Enrollment Projections". This Table shows the anticipated enrollment for the next six years based on the previous 13 year history of the District under the assumptions set forth in the comprehensive projections, Appendix A.1, and the projection for additional students generated from the Lakeland South area as shown in Appendix A.2. TABLE ASD ENROLLMENT 11.1 PROJECTIONS Oct 2002 ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ GRADE 2002-2003 2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 KDG 905 937 955 975 990 1005 1019 1 900 983 1001 1020 1036 1050 1064 2 961 931 1005 1024 1039 1054 1068 3 940 995 958 1033 1049 1063 1077 4 973 958 1011 976 1047 1061 1075 5 1062 998 977 1031 991 1061 1075 K-5 5741 5802 5907 6059 6152 6293 6377 6 1104 1087 1018 998 1048 1008 1077 7 1021 1154 1130 1063 1039 1087 1047 8 1026 1042 1166 1143 1071 1046 1095 6- 8 3151 3283 3314 3204 3158 3141 3218 9 1441 1261 1273 1398 1371 1297 1272 10 1234 1418 1232 1246 1367 1337 1264 11 927 1202 1381 1196 1205 1325 1296 12 933 842 1107 1288 1099 1107 1227 9- 12 4535 4722 4993 5128 5042 5067 5058 TOTALS 13427 1 13807 14214 14391 14352 14501 14654 GRADES K-12 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 06/07 K-5 w/K @ 112 5289 5333 5430 5572 5657 5791 5868 6-8 3151 3283 3314 3204 3158 3141 3218 9-12 4535 4722 4993 5128 5042 5067 5058 K-12 w/K @ 112 12975 13339 13737 13904 13857 13999 14144 5 4/29/2003 Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2003 through 2009 Section II Enrollment Projections 4/2 912 0 0 3 Aubum School District No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2003 through 2009 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Section VII Impact Fees CHANGES TO IMPACT FEE DATA ELEMENTS 2002 to 2003 CPF CPF DATA ELEMENTS 2002 2003 EXPLANATION Student Generation Factors Single Family Consistent with King County Ordinance 11621, Elementary 0.2913 03269 Student Generation Factors are calculated Mid School 0.1398 0.1621 by the school district based on district Sr High 01703 0.1860 records of average actual student generation Multi-Family rates for new developments constructed Elementary 0.1487 00901 over the last five years Mid School 00642 00221 Sr. High 00580 0.0510 New Facility Cost Sr. High $57,000,000 $58,500,000 1 Sr. High Cost Estimate, as of Nov 2002, is computed from completed construction documents as submitted to DOES. Elementary $15,000,000 $15,600,000 2 Elementary cost estimate from architects recent project experience and OSPI facility records Site Cost(Acre $138,123 $146,729 Updated from final cost for recent purchases escalated to anticipated 2004 purchase date. Boeckh Index $110 32 $114 88 Updated to projected SPI schedule.(G. Beck) Match %- State 54 02% 55 88% Updated to current SPI schedule Match %- District 45 98% 44 12% Computed District Average AV Single Family $174,311 $195,869 Updated from March 2003 King County Dept of Assessments data. Multi-Family $48,949 $51,516 Updated from March 2003 King County Dept of Assessments data using weighted average Debt Sery Tax Rate $2.24 $2 09 Current Fiscal Year GO Bond Int Rate 5.19% 4 74% Current Rate(Bond Buyers 20 Index 4-03) Section VIII Appendices . Appendix A 1 - Updates Non-Lakeland enrollment projections Appendix A.2- Updates Lakeland enrollment projections Appendix A 3- Student Generation Survey 4/29/2003 32 Aubum School District No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2003 through 2009 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CHANGES FROM 2002 TO 2003 Listed below is a summary level outline of the changes from the 2001-02 Capital Facilities Plan that are a part of the 2003 Plan. The changes are noted by Section for ease of reference. Section I Executive Summary Updated to reflect new information within the Plan. Summary level list of changes from previous year Section II Enrollment Projections Updated projections. See Appendices A.1 &A.2. Section III Standard of Service A. Increase in English as a Second Language program required 2 additional classrooms at the elementary level and 1 at the senior high level. B. Increase of 3 Special Education Rooms at the high school level. C Increase of 1 early childhood special education classroom D. Class size reduction funds(1-728) has created an increase of 1 additional required teaching classroom at the elementary level E Increase of 1 TOSA reading specialist classroom for high impacted school Section IV Inventory of Facilities Updated to reflect addition of 3 relocatable units at Auburn Riverside HS. Section V Pupil Capacity Updated to reflect addition of 3 relocatable units at Auburn Riverside High School. Section VI Capital Construction Plan A. One year delay in the Elementary#13 project due to reduced enrollment projections at the elementary level. B. Middle School site purchased moved up a year with passage of bond. C. Updates cost estimate based on current data for Senior High project D. Updates cost estimate based on current data for Elementary project E. Planning for Middle School#5 and Elementary#14 move into the 6 year window. 4129/2003 31 same period was 12,703.61. The actual number of individual students was 13,427 as of October 1, 2002. (See Section V for more specific information.) The capital construction plan shown in Section VI addresses the modernization of and additions to the District's existing facilities currently underway, provides for a new high school approved by the voters in February 2003, a new elementary school, and the acquisition of a new middle school site. The new facilities are required to meet the projected student population increase to be generated from the large development area within Pierce County at the southern border of the Auburn School District as well as all other areas of the District. The Pierce County area includes most of the Lakeland South development and some adjacent undeveloped properties. The School Impact Fee Ordinances adopted by King County, Pierce County, and the City of Auburn provide for the assessment of impact fees to assist in meeting some of the fiscal impact incurred by a District experiencing growth and development. Section VII sets forth the proposed school impact fees for single family and multi-family dwelling units. The student generation factors have been generated using the students who actually attend school in the Auburn School District from single family and multi-family developments constructed in the last five years. The method of collecting the data is with the use the GIS mapping software, data from King County and Pierce County GIS, and to integrate the mapping with student data from the District data system. This method gives the District actual student generation numbers for each grade span for identified developments. This data is contained in Appendix A.3. 3 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2003 through 2009 I. Executive Summary This Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") has been prepared by the Auburn School District (the "District") as the District's principal planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act and the adopted ordinances of the counties and cities served by the District. This plan was prepared using data available in the spring of 2003. This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the District. However, this Plan is not intended to be the sole plan for all of the District's needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic Long Range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board Policies and actions, taking into account a longer or a shorter time period, other factors and trends in the use of facilities, and other needs of the District as may be required. However, any such plan or plans will be consistent with this Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan. To enable impact fees to be collected in the unincorporated areas of King County and Pierce County and within the City of Auburn; the King County Council, and the City of Auburn will adopt this Plan by reference as part of its comprehensive plan, and the Pierce County Council may adopt this plan by reference as part of the Pierce County Comprehensive Plan. To enable impact fees to be collected in Cities of Algona and Pacific, these municipalities must also adopt this Plan and adopt school impact fee ordinances. Pursuant to the requirements of the Growth Management Act, the Plan will be updated on an annual basis, and any changes in the fee schedule(s)adjusted accordingly. The Plan establishes the District's "standard of service" in order to ascertain the District's current and future capacity. While the State Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines do not account for the local program needs of the District. The Growth Management Act and the school impact fee ordinance authorize the District to define its standard of service based on the District's specific needs. In general, the District's current standard provides that class size for grades K-2 should not exceed 25 students; class size for grades 3-4 should not exceed 27 students; class size for grade 5 should not exceed 30 students. When averaged over the six elementary grades, this computes to 26.5 students per classroom. Class size for grades 6-12 should not exceed 30 students, with some subject areas restricted to lesser numbers. (See Section III for more specific information.) The capacity of the schools in the District is calculated based on this standard of service and the existing inventory of facilities including transitional classrooms. The District's 2002-03 capacity was 13,360 whereas Full Time Equivalent ("FTE") enrollment for this 2 Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2003 through 2009 Section I Executive Summary 4/29/2003 Table of Contents Section I Executive Summary .............................. Page 1 Section 11 Enrollment Projections........................... Page 4 Section III Standard of Service............................... Page 6 Section IV Inventory of Facilities............................. Page 13 Section V Pupil Capacity...................................... Page 16 Section VI Capital Construction Plan....................... Page 18 Section VII Impact Fees......................................... Page 21 Section VIII Appendices.......................................... Page 25 Appendix A 1 - Student Enrollment Projections Appendix A 2- Capital Facilities Plan Projections Appendix A 3- Student Generation Survey 40 a AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 408 915 Fourth Street NE Auburn, Washington 98002 (253) 931-4900 BOARD of DIRECTORS Craig Schumaker Therald Leonard Ray Vefik Carol Helgerson Janice Nelson Linda S. Cowan, Superintendent AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT "Avenue to Excellence" b AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2003 through 2009 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT "Avenue to Excellence" Serving Students in: Unincorporated King County Unincorporated Pierce County City of Auburn City of Algona City of Pacific Adopted by the Auburn School District Board of Directors May 12, 2003 b m m IL p 0 0) N 1bp O a00 p�� OI O N < ` N 'O (n O O O O o O O O 0 N O O O O Q O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0' oM 0 S 0— _ U c co b O N �1p0 G LL O) co to O O O N N O Q O Q O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O p d O r O b 1� h (toCOO) 10 1` t7 N Of aD OI I� M b N A b O f+l - - N y N t�J N O 01 N N N A N 10 < N a C W O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C; cu G O l0 N N Ih b O O Y O I� M f�l l7 M tO le F O O O O O O O O O O O O D P7 01 b b O f� N .n- N O N l7 Of b OD W � N C >. a) 0 � -a � Z , b N Ih 1'1 f0 b n N N M1 O 10 1� Y W U o v1 W U pp (O 04 LL Q Obi O fbp Y'] N O N 1(j N f0 N x r J W O C w9 .y. I� < < N m b O b b m N m O O b G a' O N m r' N n N m b b N m rn h a N Q f 3 3 m o a x a x a J a w w J W m a w a 0 z x w f w f a t7 o W w Y W O to rn m E > m N b Ip z m �' a O N 0 C m ^ N y m V 1I1 U LL C N C C C g� q O m A w O t C t L y G O C Q C a O m n (fl 6 O w C m N Vi U t0 m C n Q m C m O U LL. Q r m O LL m m J Qm Y O) m C a 1 Y a N U C O m m m m 9 w y w c m n 10 a a o Y NN o Qm £ >` `9 [L U CO umi I�i 5 a x zm Q m U LL S x S d N m N tp 3 3 'mac N � cl) W O V] C m Y a m N O pp n n O yy O N Oi pp tp pp N A N N N o n p e N Ol m O N ^ W t a tp A n N A W G IO 01 ' m of N m S W N f0 m Q YI m m 14i m N n W m m m 10 p �O n ' O A O N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C O S U f0 I 0 m IO O m O W O W N O1 10 N �'] O W OI V pp pp W m N N O W cppp m O O1 m OI O A m m N A Q lL O m N N n m N 0 N N O N m V 10 10 IO N N n m 10 N p N n t�i m l0 m 0 N N N N N N N C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C N N �Ipp pp pp p mw WO s� p U N p e CI N O Q O N a v Q M N O a N a Yl n n < N a 1� O R N r m0 N O A tNf V C W 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 a 0 0 a 00 0 0 0 0 0 C N 01 O N W O p W OI m n r m � N y S V aOD OmD ImR mm O m O O m 0 O V O N o m N V 0� In ! A Ol N Ili m O m m m n m 10 W m 0 O> m A N N N m N m 00 cc LO � � d 000 0 O Cl) O W N F- U `o rn Q LU LL d m N m O O tOV '' v m N m o tp N N t�j N a INO N N tW0 N N S N IWO /� VIQC O J m _ W'Q aON0) N m N IL C U o � ►- g= m UJ 0wCLz > 0x003y0 W W m woMxw3 z + w WxxU > 0 7t U) t Q a g y W to J y w U U U U U) x U' J U' Z In a y 0 x W W to U U W w Y y m c 3 0 m $ L 0 c �? y O > m L CD Y O C W h U O C CW C M `4> ¢OQ W Ov m LD Y LL c m etl x U c a c m = ` o = m o a d o Na r J °' U m = a 52 cc w3 $ " m `m �° o a =° U r 0 3 ,y c .a 2S CO N w v)�, c3 UmU v rnm a C7m oi U ' m ma C m3 mmc hW in oo z y I gL ce og' U2E V E` a mao y n S. C N G C C d N 6 L H C C m m Z. t L y j m E r m C fn C E N m 6 o In E m c G y J! L La m t0 N G G O O t0 t N O O 0 0 _ O O m g A 0 0 L 0 O m - O O jp t m U U U U U V U W w w LL w m S I x Y J J J f z z a a' K y U) y N VJ P P w y c m Y ! ± a ® c ) � o o o 0 0 \ kGo Go a 5 & \ \ ° k o N o N co 2 i a e m § ! f 00 CD Of _ o / } f � o R [ o r 0 # o & $ / 2 2 \ ` t c o _ to c ! § � m » Q ! t e _ O U ] f x OLO , 2 U I \ k ® o n co , o a. a 2 0 » « k OD ~ , _ ] e a m 2 ! - % / ) a q o ) \ o o - \ m }CY \co § | £ C4 : - 7 \ n � , 10 - ,C%l en & o 0 0 cc } k / § ( \ \ 0) / _ o ) J _ S 2 k ® z ® E £ E ; $ § _ f $ & .0 \ v \ W § 0 % 0 § k 0 2 CL m k ■ B \ - \ % n ) § # E 2 k 3 cc a) o I i 2 ! $ § § s / ] ; $ I I a) ) a E - cr ± / _ a 3 § $ k § k f J � \ 3 { / E / m m 0 LU N C C O C C N C C W O E a�a m on O a M O m N CO O eeO E aO N N n m n O. 2 N V $ O m nm � O N U N V N - m N 0 C = m G = W r iri P� N W Z N C m N C O O m m ^ J v W n m N N m 1n0 v N G a p ^ m e v O m 'D N O L n O N W N m n m N W E m v n U V O mc LL c - m W m m X o " `c `�'- N _ us Q W W "W N O W n N m N O N O m n O � p y O N 9 M U W U e E `o m n m W op 3 5R E w !A N N {� N O m O ^ U y C m o N C LL U K U E t N T m m C C 3 a W 4 N Q 7 O O N N O N O Q a C V w S 2 m Z QLU o E yy pp wA o 12 QE V O O` m m GOO m 0�0 W GOpV a W if N In V H V C W N a U U m N F `O XOle 7 2U U O m ,O m O O O m p�� U N m m N �.mj N m L J Q n m O�i W 4 O PO') V O lOo A W N U m T Q o CL Z U) a� v a a U m oa. m N W Q = W m N L N yZ CL U N m m m m u� n Q Go a` U CIAn d o m Q $ m Go u O G E z - ° mC W w C N w O U) C D O N N U O J yY� UJ C Y C) w 3 N c n n t u� w m m m t = v u m v r IL d coy = 8 = x N V a m O 6 b C N O m .p O m ik N V m v m v w N v j 0 a b U m m m m (A N N v N n �NL Em m O m m PI m m v O A 10�1 1GL m N U ^ n Yg 1� Q Jm A n n m tmD Oni m N N m O $ m j w m UCL m N v v m v v m L° Lo U m Cr m a _m L m m U `ei d W # N !2N fmV N (mV N ev'1 N T m fA U Cn! V m A T 2 v N O = V UE E ' w W W La IL Y Y Y Y m J LL m Q U Z Q Q p Q V C m W Q J L 3 J ~ U m O (n d F LM m F � CL S L am ovi w w x = > O x = = > �, O G1 o W _rn L r _rn 2 _a 'm L = c ° :E E g Go) C U) it8 L = _ = 2 -i 2 c L y d yy v m U QLL° m m Q Y O N 2 Y m Q Cl W m m Z y u c E Y Q y d m d m o a�i Y m m m m Y z m c v) h U Y Z V) Y Y Y Y N N W u C�8 L U C m Y a E F c Z W `• N E Y m O v O N n N W W O b 0 O v N w m Obi O N M N m N O m m 9 A Z o = Q e v < in v a '�i a v lAA a �n In a e .o a �n ��(!ll �n u> v� a �n a 'v CD E c W ° v 0'. W � E � w W $ v m iE o M .9 o .i Ui ..9 e 8 � Ui 8 .i o Ui 8 � w 8 0 Ui 8 .9 .9 o A S � a' U N W E W z M o c Yj a n a a M v a n e o v a a a m V �i a 59 e e a e n m m g m O W = c U � r > m U 21 W R m m O O O O O N O O O O m m O O O m N b O O O O O N H D m w Y C U m + d l0 a v W J w `U. W j tH� O O O N O V t7 O N O O N N O O O N O O O O n E C w y N E � m 3 N U or v m J E w w + m N N N N N N 0 N O V a n _ m w z0 z 8 ^ C� a C1 E Z r z o L Q } a a a m r o m M N o ro n v m Z 00 w F i ut y�y ��pp op p N QL�EIL LU a V Z_ n 6 O R O tlf O O O t+01 R 0 0 0 0 R O O O R N O tOD pQw O. t Q F h a u Z ry IIITTTIII 5 y W a Ti n E Y Q ik W U M V n N M M N M N N M V V M N M M M V N V V �- N N M N �- M w G y o E w w Q W E a ?? N U w v a e v e o v a a vi v v vi e v a Si a e a a M w 0 m S d `m m E ,. ° n p p a N • R N R N W N N R N N N N M '! N N p M V OI m Z W E N R N N N N N N N N N N a m V Zo m a N N U c m K E m w m a U > 0 3 w 2 a 2 K j w bl a „ U U U U o w w ((�� a o _ Y z a a a M W m C E o ts y m > m v O H c g yC a pp� m x E w B f- `° 0 r5c LL Q w 0 m _ m m m m v$_' m W m Y P _ w :9 Y 2 c7 'u m a m U E o w E m n S c Z 1 M m m > n T' c c w > cm c 0 m = m am b E m H aci U w m e 0 L° c w c u U F £ E v '> " c w m c w S x c m r m c m T m 'c w c c m E E E N n m m o L° m m E m m T O m m m m m m m m c I m $ g E W m m d m U U U U o W W LL Q u x Y J T.. Z a Q a C y y y m qJ Y W Y W > r. ... .Y .-. .. ... ... .. r .. r ... f l C O 8 y c I Y � X Appendixes Appendix A: Calculations of Capacities for Elementary Schools Appendix B: Calculations of Capacities for Junior High Schools Appendix C: Calculations of Capacities for Senior High Schools Appendix D: Use of Relocatables Appendix E: Student Generation Factor Survey i i Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Apnl 2003 Page 31 IX Summary of Changes to April 2002 Capital Facilities Plan 1101 The Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") is updated annually based on previous Plans in effect since 1993. The primary changes from the April 2002 Plan are summarized here. Property for Junior High #8 was determined not feasible and is still for sale. Voters approved funding for additions at three high schools to accommodate new growth, moving 9'h grade to senior highs, which will provide additional capacity for grade 7-8 at junior high schools in 2004. Kent Junior High will close for remodeling in 2004-05 and re-open as a middle school in 2005-06. Changes to capacity continue to reflect reduction in class size for grades K - 4 as well as program changes. Reduction in class size for Student Achievement Initiative 728 is reflected in this update. Changes in portables or transitional capacity reflect purchase, sale, surplus and/or movement of portables between facilities Student enrollment forecast is updated annually. Permanent facility costs are based on schools built most recently with adjustment for 5% Inflation rate. The district expects to receive state matching funds for projects in this Plan and tax credit factors are updated annually. Unfunded facility needs will be reviewed in the future. Impact fee calculations include a "District Adjustment" which is equal to the amount of increase from impact fee formulas and adjusted for increase in the Consumer Price Index. See page 25 for further explanation The biennial student generation factor survey was updated to reflect changes. Changes reflected no adjustment for occupancy. Survey data is included as Appendix E. Changes to Impact Fee Calculation Factors include: ITEM Grade/Type FROM TO Comments Student Generation Factor Elem 0504 0 466 Single Family(SF) Jr 0 211 0 227 Updated in 2002 Plan Sr 0 183 0200 Total 0 898 0 893 Student Generation Factor Elem 0 273 0 281 Multi-Family(MF) Jr 0 114 0 105 Updated in 2002 Plan Sr 0 076 0.068 Total 0 463 0 454 State Match Credit 5419% 54 29% 161 change since 1999 Plan Area Cost Allowance (Beockh Index) $110 32 $125 32 Per SPI Average Assessed Valuation (AV) SF $205,665 $222,591 Per Puget Sound ESD AV-Average of Condominiums &Apts. MF $65,868 $65,437 Per Puget Sound ESD Debt Service Capital Levy Rate/$1000 $210 $210 Per King County Assessor General Obligation Bond Interest Rate 519% 4 69% Market Rate Impact Fee-Single Family SF $4,147 $4,292 Change to fee Impact Fee- Multi-Family MF $2,554 $2,643 Change to fee Kent School Distnct Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2003 Page 30 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENCE Site Acquisition Cost per Multi-Family Residence Unit Formula ((Acres x Cost per Acre)/Facility Capacity)x Student Generation Factor Required Site Acreage I Average Site CosVAcre I Facility Capacity Sludent Factor A 1 (Elementary) 11 $81,558 500 0.281 $504 19 A 2 (Junior High) 21 $0 1,065 0.105 $0 A 3 (Senior High) 27 $82,761 2,213 0068 $68 66 0.454 A—> $572 85 Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Multi-Family Residence Unit Formula ((Facility Cost/Facility Capacity)x Student Factor)x(Permanent/Total Square Footage Ratio) Construction Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio B 1 (Elementary) $18,000,000 500 0.281 096 $9,711 36 B 2 (Junior High) $0 1.065 0 105 096 $0 B 3 (Senior High) $24,800,000 2,213 0 068 096 $731 56 0.454 B—> $10,442 92 Temporary Facility Cost per Mufti-Family Residence Unit Formula ((Facility Cost/Facility Capacity)x Student Factor)x(Temporary/Total Square Footage Ratio) Facility Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Rapo C 1 (Elementary) $91,181 23 0 281 004 $44 56 C 2 (Junior High) $91,181 29 0.105 0.04 $13 21 C 3 (Senior High) $91,181 31 0 068 0.04 $8 00 0 454 C—> $65 77 State Match Credit per Multi-Family Residence Unit Formula Area Cost Allowance x SPI Square Feet per student x District Match% x Student Factor Area Cost Allowance SPI Sq Ft /Student I Distnct Match% Student Factor D 1 (Elementary) $125 32 80 05429 0 281 $1,529 45 D 2 (Junior High) $125.32 113.33 0 0 105 $0 D 3 (Senior High) $125 32 120 0.5419 0 068 $554 15 D—> $2,083 61 Tax Credit per Multi-Family Residence Unit Average MF Residential Assessed Value $65,437 Current Capital Levy Rate/$1.000 $2 10 Current Bond Interest Rate 4 69% Years Amortized (10 Years) 10 TC—> $1,076 69 Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility/Site Value Dwelling Units 0 0 FC—> 0 Fee Recap A = Site Acquisition per Multi-Family Unit $572 85 B = Permanent Facility Cost per MF Unit $10.442.92 C = Temporary Facility Cost per MF Unit $65.77 Subtotal $11,081.54 D = State Match Credit per MF Unit $2,083 61 TC=Tax Credit per MF Unit $1,076.69 Subtotal $3,160 30 Total Unfunded Need $7,921 24 50%Developer Fee Obligation $3,960.62 FC= Facility Credit(if applicable) 0 District Adjustment (See Page 25 for explanation) ($1,317 62) Net Fee Obligation per Multi-Family Residence Unit $2,643 00 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Apn1 2003 Page 29 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Site Acquisition Cost per Single Family Residence Formula ((Acres x Cost per Acre)/Facility Capacity)x Student Generation Factor Required Site Acreage I Average Site CosuAcre I Faahry Capacity Student Factor Al (Elementary) 11 $81,558 500 0466 $83613 A 2 (Junior High) 21 $0 1,065 0 227 $0 A 3 (Senior High) 27 $82,761 2,213 0200 $201 95 0 893 A—> $1,03808 Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Single Family Residence Formula ((Facility Cost/Facility Capacity)x Student Factor)x(Permanentlrotal Square Footage Ratio) Construction Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio B 1 (Elementary) $18,000,000 500 0466 096 $16,10496 B 2 (Junior High) $0 1,065 0.227 096 $0 B 3 (Senor High) $24,800,000 2.213 9 200 096 $2.151 65 0,893 B—> $18,256 61 Temporary Facility Cost per Single Family Residence Formula ((Facility Cost/Facility Capacity)x Student Factor)x(Temporary/Total Square Footage Ratio) Facility Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio C 1 (Elementary) $91,181 23 0 466 004 $73 90 C 2 (Junior High) $91,101 29 0 227 004 $28.55 C 3 (Senior High) $91.181 31 0200 004 $23 53 0.893 C—> $125 98 State Match Credit per Single Family Residence Formula Area Cost Allowance x SPI Square Feet per student x District Match% x Student Factor Area Cost Allowance SPI Sq Ft /Student I District Match% Student Factor D 1 (Elementary) $125 32 80 05429 0 466 $2,536 39 D 2 (Junior High) $125 32 11333 0 0 227 $0 D 3 (Senior High) $125 32 120 0,5429 0200 $1,632 87 D—> S4,169 26 Tax Credit per Single Family Residence Average SF Residential Assessed Value $222.591 Current Capital Levy Rate/$1,000 $2 10 Current Bond Interest Rate 4 69% Years Amortized (10 Years) 10 TC—> $3,662 48 Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility/Site Value Dwelling Units 0 0 FC—> 0 Fee Recap A = Site Acquisition per SF Residence $1,038 08 B = Permanent Facility Cost per Residence $18,256 61 C = Temporary Facility Cost per Residence $125 98 Subtotal $19,420 67 D = Stale Match Credit per Residence $4,169 26 TC=Tax Credit per Residence $3,662 48 Subtotal $7,831.74 Total Unfunded Need $11,588 93 50%Developer Fee Obligation $5,794 46 FC=Facility Credit(if applicable) 0 District Adjustment (See Page 25 for explanation) ($1,502 46) Net Fee Obligation per Single Family Residence $4,292 00 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2003 Page 28 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT FACTORS FOR ESTIMATED IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS Student Generation Factors -Single Family Student Generation Factors- Multi-Family Elementary 0 466 Elementary 0.281 Junior High 0.227 Junior High 0.105 Senior High 0200 Senior High 0 068 Total 0.893 Total 0 454 Projected Student Capacity SPI Square Footage per Student Elementary 500 Elementary 80 Junior High 1,065 Junior High 113.33 Senior High 2,213 Senior High 120 Required Site Acreage per Facility Average Site Cost/Acre Elementary (required) 11 Elementary $81,558 Junior High (required) 21 Junior High $0 Senior High (required) 27 Senior High $82,761 New Facility Construction Cost Temporary Facility Capacity & Cost Elementary $18,000,000 Elementary @ 23 $91,181 Junior High $0 Junior High @ 29 $91,181 Senior High $24,800,000 Senior High @ 31 $91,181 -See calculations on Pg 25 Temporary Facility Square Footage State Match Credit Elementary 86,956 Current State Match Percentage 54.29% Junior High 26,280 for Senior High Additions Senior High 21,736 Total 4% 134,972 Area Cost Allowance -Cost/Sq. Ft. Current Area Cost Allowance $125.32 Permanent Facility Square Footage Elementary 1,455,606 Junior High 753,079 District Average Assessed Value Senior High 800,882 Single Family Residence $222,591 Total 96% 3,009,567 Total Facilities Square Footage District Average Assessed Value Elementary 1,542,562 Multi-Family Residence $65,437 Junior High 779,359 Senior High 822,618 Total 3,144,539 Capital Levy Tax Ratel$1,000 Current /$1,000 Tax Rate $2 10 Developer Provided Sites/Facilities Value 0 General Obligation Bond Interest Rate Dwelling Units 0 Current Bond Interest Rate 4.69% Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Apnl 2003 Page 27 m N Im m a a m a a o U CD m N > r > r (ii m N a f` Q > (n o m r « f0 « f V •m f • Q (0 O > co 0 cn y OD fn r N E m v F HO W to Q m N (n o) a r w co V CO C) co (N r 0) 1n N h O f�- d CO N co Cl If (0 M co m (0 O r N O N fo r OD (0 n M V, co v� co M O M CO (n N O (0 (o N �-• CD sf M CO 0 N Iq CO m N N M N O N (n Itt N r � r N 69 64 69 69 64 69 r 69 0 69 69 N ff! 69 � to 69 to fA M Q of 0 O O N r N M OO N w O N O O O T f` r r M CD O O h r 0 (0 st O M of N N N O M r LO (0 M 1-- O LO (n h to (0 (0 w r In O O f- O N r 0 N am O O M CD O CO (O (O r (n N �- M M O f- N 6 (6 0 (n r M r CO O fl- f- I,- M CD LO M r M CD -T U (O `Q (n O r a M (n N c+) r (0 N M m V, Cl) (n M r N r •- to to Efl 69 fh r 69 to 6% r M M to 40 V fA to 69 vi fo r to fy 611) to 69 40 to N mp) M Cl) O V O O t0 O C) co N r O O of r O M V r m (O to c0 (n n Cl1` v CO V O r- C7 (,.� O O Or u rr r r �- r r �-• r M - NC)O N 4 M N M O O ) Q N M Qf � (n co � n A (n C N N O _ O O � Z to t co O OGo 7 m M U 7 0 c N cm fA a N v U N cn N O N O m O m m 000, O = O = o` o o c o 2 0) R+ W G m fn co O m O 01 0) > 02 m > m Y O N m C m d U Y Y h O m J NI Y y W Y �m Y W W O > fQ m O O N ��pp ��pp �U{ p tvp O to G > N N N N N p V1 O Im W N Cl) N IO O in N b (Wq N W W p p W p N 'C e N N U O VL N O O O) N O O 0) N f` cNf N r u O O cnN Nm ? N P) 0 Y cn O O V OOD U Q 7 N N N W W N a N w n c0 (n w Q A W W O N CD WY � U ? 0 H t9 O 0ONm N � NN 0P) p m m pNOj a m .' m Y < c � t n ro E (r 0 0 Q w IE u a E m Y m m to j C G T Y •C � o. m c � m m a m o m o c v um o cm 3 0 2 ° Y x 'u c N 10 m o m 2 oW CO L E '0 co ri. E c m C vm umv1 m r co a0. ` ma Y «cc m O o 0 Nc W O CDff O m U ( O ' (q m D a O Y O nm c i! QJ N Q1 -4O (0 0O C O 0 N U Q C LL E 3 w 4D O Y n w `o c m L° M: H _o N o m -j O 7 �c o IC L m < n Cl) u d W 10 E O >m 7 O 0 O O p U WW c U 2 N U O 4) EC ) ) ) x m0 � w om o Y n : = = C9 Y Win fA fq to tp Z Y fq fA Co Y Y a � L" 06 Lo Cb m m m m 2 O • m c m m m -2 { { = m 2 5 f Q = - 8 ~ 7t IL e cn N ^ W ' _ f0 CY (0 O C Z m Y V I I I Finance Plan - Cost Basis Summary For impact fee calculations, construction costs are based on cost of the last elementary school, with 5% inflation factor, and the projected construction cost of the additions to three high schools. Elementary School Cost Projected Cost Millennium Elementary (#30-open 2000) $12,182,768 Current cost of Elementary#31 $14,103,076 Projected cost of Elementary#31 in 2008 $18,000,000 Senior High Schools Projected Cost Total Addition to Kent-Meridian $4,800,000 Addition to Kentrid a $10,400,000 Addition to Kentwood $9,600,000 Projected construction cost of $24,800,000 additions to 3 High Schools The site acquisition cost is based on an average cost of sites purchased or built on within the last ten years. Please see Table 7 on page 26 for a list of site acquisition costs and averages. The impact fee calculations on pages 28 and 29 include a "District Adjustment" which is equal to the amount of increase that the impact fee formulas drive out for this year and adjusted for increase in the Consumer Price Index. The reasons for this adjustment include: 1) the district's long-term commitment to keep impact fee increases as minimal as possible, and 2) our community's overwhelming support of Initiative 695. Kent School District six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2003 Page 25 Ct / U- CY 1 k k It . § 170 K . � ! 7 / R Wi CL f / ® ! § 0 qt a - k _ � ] - CD § § u & / & _ e C%lJ } I § 7 CL § m } K � 69 e� CL � \ % \ 2 ) ■ ` k X �Lu § 2 \ R V 2 § L / k un | CD \ ) f \ { fcc E s d \ \ . \ _b / ) ) } Ct CDe M _ ] ° LL — _ k k� _ - ) 0 § ] / E / 2 CD 7 ) / \ 2 cn § k � 4 E =CL k \ ° » \ \ \ ) / k k 2 ` ƒ 2 k § E — I co 0 — } u J e C e i £ r ƒ = f k V I I I Finance Plan The finance plan shown on Table 6 demonstrates how the Kent School District plans to finance improvements for the years 2003 - 2004 through 2008 - 2009. The financing components include secured and unsecured funding and impact fees. The plan is based on voter approval of future bond issues, collection of impact fees under the State Growth Management Act and voluntary mitigation fees paid pursuant to State Environmental Policy Act. Kent Elementary #27a, which opened in January 1999 as a replacement for the original Kent Elementary School, was the last school for which the District received state matching funds under the current state funding formula. The District anticipates receiving state matching funds for the senior high school additions. Millennium Elementary #30 which opened in the fall of 2000 was the last elementary school that has received funding approval from voters. Voters approved a $69.5 million bond issue for Capital Construction and Improvements in February 2002. This will fund building additions at three high schools which will coincide with moving 9th grade to the senior high in 2004. Some funding is secured for additional portables and some will be funded from impact fees. Unfunded facility needs will be reviewed in the future. For the Six-Year Finance Plan, costs of future schools are based on estimates from Kent School District Facilities Department. Please see pages 25-26 for a summary of the cost basis. Kent School Distnct Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2003 Page 23 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL YEAR 2002-2003 2003-2004 1 2004-2005 2005-2006 1 2006-2007 2007-2008 1 2008-2009 Actual P R O J E C T E D Elementary Permanent Program Capacity 12,521 12.937 12,937 12,937 12,937 12,937 12,937 Kent Mountain View Academy' 416 New Permanent Elementary Construction Elementary#31 (Unfunded)° 500 Subtotal 12,937 12,937 12,937 12,937 12,937 12,937 13,437 Relocatab►e Capacity Required 2 299 23 0 0 46 230 0 TOTAL CAPACITY s 13,236 12,960 12,937 12,937 12,983 13,167 13,43T FTE ENROLLMENT/PROJECTION 3 13,222 12,950 12,844 12,872 12,973 13,167 13,377 SURPLUS DEFICIT CAPACITY 14 10 93 65 10 0 60 Number of Relocatables Required 13 1 0 0 2 10 0 t Kent Mountain View Academy is a special program at Grandview School serving students in Grades K- 12. The school(formerly Kent Learning Center&Grandview Elem )was designed and utilized as an elementary school. 2 Capacity is based on standard of service for program capacity and is updated periodically to reflect program changes 3 FTE=Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment or Projection (ECE& Kindergarten @ .5) Facility needs are pending review. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 C April 2003 Page 22 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY JUNIOR HIGH 3 SCHOOL YEAR 2002-2003 2003-20041 2004 2005 2005-2006 1 2006-2007 2007-2008 1 200e-2009 Actual P R O J E C T E D Junior High Permanent Program Capacity 5,984 5,984 5,984 5,168 5,984 5,984 5,984 New Capacity from Grade Reconfiguration 3 Grade level reconfiguration-9th grade moves to high schools in 2004 4 Kent Junior High closed for remodel in 2004-05-Middle School reopens in 2005 -816 816 Subtotal 5,984 5,984 5,168 5,984 5,984 5,984 5,984 Relocatable Capacity Required ' 899 928 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL CAPACITY 163 1 6,883 6,912 5,168 5,984 5,984 5,984 5,984 FTE ENROLLMENT/PROJECTION 2 6,863 6,909 4,561 4,536 4,517 4,519 4,495 SURPLUS DEFICIT CAPACITY 20 3 607 1,448 1,467 1,465 1,489 Number of Relocatables Required 31 32 0 0 0 0 0 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for program capacity and updated penodically to reflect program changes 2 FTE =Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment/Projection Approximately 220 9th grade students are currently served at high schools. 3 Grade level reconfiguration - 9th grade will move to the high schools in 2004. 4 Kent Junior High closed for remodel in 2004-05-Kent Middle School re-opens in Fall 2005 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 B April 2003 Page 21 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY SENIOR HIGH 3 SCHOOL YEAR 2002-2003 2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-2006 1 2006-2007 2007-200e 1 2008-2009 Actual P R O J E C T E D Senior High Permanent Program Capacity 5,631 5,631 5,631 7,844 7,844 7,844 7,844 New Permanent Senior High Construchon 3 Grade level reconfiguration-9th grade moves to high schools in 2004 Classrooms added at three high schools 2,213 Subtotal 5,631 5,631 7,844 7,844 7,844 7,844 7,844 Relocatable Capacity Required 'a° 0 0 403 744 992 1,178 1,209 TOTAL CAPACITY t 5,631 5,631 8,247 8,588 8,836 9,022 9,053 FTE ENROLLMENT I PROJECTION gas 5,337 5,479 8,230 8,562 8,826 8,993 9,033 SURPLUS (DEFICIT)CAPACITY 294 152 17 26 10 29 20 Number of Relocatables Required 0 0 13 24 32 38 39 Capacity is based on standard of service for program capacity and updated periodically to reflect program changes 2 FTE =Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment, excluding full time Running Start students Approximately 220 Junior High students are served all or part of the day at high schools. 03 Grade level reconfiguration- 9th grade will move to the high schools in 2004. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 A April 2003 Page 20 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY TOTAL DISTRICT 3 SCHOOL YEAR 2002-2003 2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-2006 1 2006-2007 1 2007-2008 1 2008-2009 Actual P R O J E C T E D Permanent Program Capacity' 24,552 24,552 24,552 26,765 26,765 26,765 26,765 New Permanent Construction ' Grade level reconfiguration-91h grade moves to high schools in 2004 Additions to Senior High schools 2,213 Elementary#31 (Unfunded)5 500 Permanent Program Capacity Subtotal 24,552 24,552 26,765 26,765 26,765 26,765 27,265 Interim Relocatable Capacity 0 Elementary Relocatable Capacity Required 299 23 0 0 46 230 0 Junior High Relocatable Capacity Required 899 928 0 0 0 0 0 Senior High Relocatable Capacity Required 0 0 403 744 992 1,178 1,209 Total Relocatablecapacity Required'g4 1,198 951 403 744 1,038 1,408 1,209 TOTAL CAPACITY ' 25,750 25,503 27,168 27,509 27,803 1 28,173 1 28,474 2 &TOTAL FTE ENROLLMENT/PROJECTIO3 25,422 25,338 25,635 25,970 26,316 26,679 26,905 DISTRICT AVAILABLE CAPACITY 328 165 1,533 1,539 1,487 1,494 1,569 ' Capacity is based on standard of service for program capacity and updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 FTE= Full Time Equivalent Enrollment (ie ECE Preschool Handicapped& 112 day Kindergarten student= .5). 3 In 2004, 9th grade will move to the high schools and result in increased capacity at Middle School level 2002-2003 total classroom relocatable capacity is 2,051. 5 Unfunded facility needs are pending review is Kent School Distnct Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 April 2003 Page 19 V I I Projected Six-Year Classroom Capacity As stated in Section I V, the program capacity study is periodically updated for changes in special programs and reflects class size reduction in Grades K - 4. As shown in the Inventory and Capacity chart in Table 3 on Page 12, the program capacity is also reflected in the capacity and enrollment comparison charts. (See Tables 5 B SA-B-C on pages 19-22) Enrollment is reported to OSPI on Form P-223 on a monthly basis and funding apportionment is based on Annual Average FTE (AAFTE). The first school day of October is set by OSPI as the enrollment count date for the year. Full Time Equivalent (FTE) student enrollment for October 1, 2002 was 25,353.74 with kindergarten students counted at .5 and excluding Early Childhood Education students (ECE - preschool special education) and College- only Running Start students. (See Tables 5 a 5 A-B-c on pages 19-22) Kent School District continues to be the fourth largest district in the state of Washington. P223 Headcount for October 1, 2002 was 26,378 with kindergarten students counted at 1.0 and excluding ECE and college-only Running Start students. A headcount of all students enrolled on October 1, 2002 totals 26,717 which includes ECE and college-only Running Start students. Based on the enrollment forecasts, current inventory and capacity, current standard of service, relocatable capacity, and future planned classroom space, the District anticipates having sufficient capacity to house students over the next six years. (See Table 5 and Tables SA-B-C on Pages 19-22) This does not mean that some schools will not experience overcrowding. There may be significant need for additional portables and/or new schools to accommodate growth within the District and class size reduction mandated under Student Achievement Initiative 728. Some schools, by design, may be opened with relocatables on site. Boundary changes, limited movement of relocatables, zoning changes, market conditions, and educational restructuring will all play a major role in addressing overcrowding and underutilization of facilities in different parts of the District. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2003 Page 18 V I Relocatable Classrooms For the purpose of clarification, the term "portables" and the more descriptively accurate term, "relocatables" are used interchangeably in this Plan. The Plan also references use of portables or relocatables as interim or transitional capacity/facilities. Currently, the District utilizes 158 total relocatables to house students in excess of permanent capacity, for program purposes at school locations, and six for other purposes. (See Appendices A B C D) Based on enrollment projections, program capacity and funded permanent facilities, the District anticipates the need to purchase some additional relocatables during the next six-year period. During the time period covered by this Plan, the District does not anticipate that all of the District's relocatables will be replaced by permanent facilities. During the useful life of some of the relocatables, the school-age population may decline in some communities and increase in others, and these relocatables provide the flexibility to accommodate the immediate needs of the community. Portables, or relocatables, may be used as interim or transitional facilities: 1. To prevent overbuilding or overcrowding of permanent school facilities. 2. To cover the gap between the time of demand for increased capacity and completion of permanent school facilities to meet that demand. 3. To meet unique program requirements. Portables, or relocatables, currently in use will be evaluated resulting in some being improved and some replaced. Quality concerns will be among those addressed by the next Citizens' Facilities Planning Committee in review of capital facilities needs for the next bond issue. The Plan projects that the District will use relocatables to accommodate interim housing needs for the next six years and beyond. The use of relocatables, their impacts on permanent facilities, life cycle and operational costs, and the interrelationship between relocatables, emerging technologies and educational restructuring will continue to be be examined. Kent School Distnd six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2003 Page 17 r— O Z 0 Y V Oa •_ y L y �r 0 CQ m L 3p ^` Y N m W N — ~� n W a •g �m O I O •f) a XL mm n mY 0 Y Z h Ya � 'a' > om 00 mo v of o m u RO• AR D r °O `c V/ pC mw Y .� E U • m Y m0 yD«o Cr Ay mu? O X mH L om Om cc(D DpIM! > J� 0 OG W °m H D �pU Uw O D2, • pC C� • �O 2 O �� YSA Cad 02 07 c £ 35 enV 4lh91 C CW O ° B OG 21 D r Cor h � 05 �mC oP �a m 4�y E• mE 013 0 w ow H Dc J m° m £ a • • C a 2m C C C Cm N •w Om 3S enV WSOp I m• H n E N V E VO 00 •w h 2w DO-E r p m� �=L r 3S and PUMi L c U 3SanVP UZCI mm« co E -E 3- 18 ° E tm c rmoo 00 ow ° ••' m •� £ E 0, CWW • 20 a Cm0 10 • c� aw m W mm °p £ •- ° E9 Ea 2 Lo 02 v ox • as y WW OE• Q m` • m° f6 Om C yC 3S enV W901 •02 a 0 pr O m O• 00 2r• �D=o• 3s enV 4lC01 _0 CE C0 C Yz U y m gu =^ N am _o mE Y� CC Y0W H !-0 • enV I°IjUeo 10 N TO7 ° 4�y Z AOMLI&H AOIIDA ISeM • c• E Yo O c £ OC 3 m€ m r N m 00 y 1 Zw C E 2CDD K��Am x�, • s aaoue�w Kent School Distnct Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2003 Page 16 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.415 Site Acquisitions and Projects Planned to Provide Additional Capacity Protected Protected %for SCHOOL / FACILITY ! SITE LOCATION Type*Completion Program I new Date Capacity Growth Approximate I Appronmate ELEMENTARY (Numbers assigned to future schools may not correlate with number of existing schools.) Elementary If 31 (Unfunded) To be determined 2 New Planning 2008 500 75% JUNIOR HIGH Grade Level Reconfiguration will Move 9th grade to High School Program Planning 2004 provide additional capacity at Junior High schools SENIOR HIGH Classroom additions at Kent-Meridian Additions Planning 2004 316 100% 3 high schools and move Kentndge Additions Planning 2004 1.001 100% 9th Grade to high school Kentwood Additions Planning 2004 896 100% Additional TEMPORARY FACILITIES Capacity Relocatabies For placement as needed New Planning 2003+ 23.31 each 100% SUPPORT FACILITIES Bus Facility (Unfunded)' Near Kent-Mendian High School New Planning TBD 2 N/A a on I Land Use Map J OTHER SITES ACQUIRED Type Jurisdiction 4 Covington area (Near Mattson JH) SE 251 & 164 SE, Covington 98042 Elementary City of Covington 7 Covington area (Scarsella) SE 290&156 SE, Kent 98042 Elementary King County 5 Covington area West(Halleson) 15435 SE 256 Street, Covington 98042 TBD' City of Covington 3 Ham Lake area (Pollard) 16820 SE 240, Kent 98042 Elementary King County 8 SE of Lake Morton area(West) SE 332&204 SE, Kent 98042 Junior High King County 2 Shady Lake area (Sowers,etc.) 17426 SE 192 Street, Renton 98058 Elementary King County 1 So King Co.Activity Center(Nike site) SE 167& 170 SE, Renton 98058 TBD' King County 12 Former Jr Hi#8 site lPtemmons-Yeh-Wms) SE 286th Street&124th Ave.SE,Kent Site was determined to be"unbuildable"for a junior high and property is now for sale Notes: ' Unfunded facility needs will be reviewed in the future. 2 TBD-To be determined-Some sites are acquired but placement, timing and/or configuration have not been determined. 3 Numbers correspond to sites on Map on Page 16 Other site locations are parcels identified in Table 7 on Page 26 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 4 April 2003 Page 15 V Six-Year Planning and Construction Plan At the time of preparation of this Plan in spring of 2003, the following projects are completed or in the planning phase in the District- Construction funding for additions to three high schools received voter approval.The Board authorized grade level reconfiguration to move 9`h grade students to high schools and serve 7"'and 8"'grade students at middle schools New classroom additions will add capacity for 2,213 students when 91"Grade moves to the high schools. Construction is expected to be complete by Fall of 2004. • Reconfiguration will provide additional capacity at middle schools. Implementation is expected for 2004 • The Board approved a temporary closure to remodel Kent Junior High. In 2004-05, students from KJH will attend other middle schools when 9"'grade students have moved to the high schools Kent Junior will re-open as a middle school with additional programs in 2005. • A site was purchased at 15435 SE 256'Street in Covington, and remains a part of the site bank for future schools. Other potential future sites and facilities are listed in Table 4 and shown on the site map on page 17. • The Board authorized purchase of a site for Junior High#8 east of 1241"Avenue SE at SE 286'h Street That site was determined not to be feasible and the property is for sale. • Some funding is secured for purchase of additional portables and some funding may be provided by impact fees as needed. The sites have not been determined. County and city planners and decision-makers are encouraged to consider safe walking conditions for all students when reviewing applications and design plans for new roads and developments. This should include sidewalks for pedestrian safety, pull-outs and tum-arounds for school buses. Included in this Plan is an inventory of potential projects and sites identified by the District which are potentially acceptable site alternatives in the future. (see Table al The voter approved bond issue for $105.4 million in 1990 and $130 million in 1994 included funding for the purchase of eleven sites for some of these and future schools, and the sites acquired to date are included in this Plan. Some funding is secured for purchase of additional sites but some may be funded with impact fees as needed. Not all undeveloped properties meet current school construction requirements and some property may be traded or sold to meet future facility needs. 2002 voter approval of $69.5 million bond issue for capital improvement included the construction funding for additions to three high schools which are scheduled to be completed in 2004. Student Achievement Initiative 728 funds are being utilized to reduce class size and provide extended learning opportunities. Based on community input, the Board will continue annual review of standard of service and those decisions will be reflected in the each update of the Capital Facilities Plan. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2003 Page 14 w � '0 z 0U Cm0 m {� H 00 0- = i MF- CO he MI m 0 m m oa °:'. 0 0 0 Y 3 0 ` 0 G `►- m 0 •o E O C 0 w U a t t mC VVUo � o Y= a v V =C s Ya s m m o0 ma °'• C a"E o c m ^C eE• " Y �• "J+ W C _ `J 0- Uw Y i m m 0 g•0 r N mm mUIC C E 5 n m ¢ a a = g8 w u Or • C 0C C •w 0° o >° 3C• oY m • • 3 �,L i o o ,e 3S eAv wV9I 6` DO tE C Z'• mm• mE m ym CO O �y m N 00 J Ww ow £ o zE r • 9� £ m a W cc 04) A }X ,n m • o m A `rn •w xw E x -+�r 35 0AV PUZCIE 3S eAV PUZCI a0Oce v= •c cm m� u Om �E �cm of mE m 4m Q y� praiw •> m00 •Ey �w Dr Cmtd2 0 fNw • C� nw Cf Cf 5 mmom• co ` r aOE • t t > mm uC f mx Cjm �f V uEw OE• mm • Qo F`� V1 v, V1 m EE .•p Q am W �^ O 0 ' Cn t71 C Y 0 oa.0 C m:EE =r coap• 35 eAV WOO m C = _ OW DIM W4E � _` w � � W x W �1 o °m N CO YAS ww N • y !D, e V IOJlueU a H w N Z AC-051H AeIIOA 15eMSo • C• �p yE U� Cm >E E c m o c � ou • q e40We44 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2003 Page 13 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.415 INVENTORY and CAPACITY of EXISTING SCHOOLS 2002-2003 Year SCHOOL Opened ASR ADDRESS Program Capacl ' Carnage Crest Elementary 1990 CC 18235-140th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 470 Cedar Valley Elementary 1971 CV 26500 Timberlane Way SE, Covington 98042 401 Covington Elementary 1961 CO 17070 SE Wax Road, Covington 98042 482 Crestwood Elementary 1980 CW 25225-180th Avenue SE, Covington 9BD42 437 Dame]Elementary 1992 DE 11310 SE 248th Street, Kent 98031 426 East Hill Elementary 1953 EH 9825 S 240th Street, Kent 98031 406 Emerald Park 1999 EP 11800 SE 216th Street, Kent 98031 460 Fanwood Elementary 1969 FW 16600.148th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 431 Glenndge Elementary 1996 GR 19405-120th Avenue SE,Renton 98058 450 Grass Lake Elementary 1971 GL 28700-191 at Place SE, Kent 9B042 460 Horizon Elementary 1990 HE 27641-144th Avenue SE, Kent 98042 444 Jenkins Creek Elementary 1987 JC 26915-1861h Avenue SE, Covington 98042 434 Kent Elementary 1999 KE 24700-64th Avenue South, Kent 98032 426 Lake Youngs Elementary 1965 LY 19660-142nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042 539 Martin Sortun Elementary 1987 MS 12711 SE 248th Street, Kent 98031 440 Meadow Ridge Elementary 1994 MR 27710-108th Avenue SE,Kent 9B031 411 Meridian Elementary 1939 ME 25621-140th Avenue SE, Kent 98042 539 Millennium Elementary 2000 ML 11919 SE 270th Street, Kent 98031 428 Neety-O'Bnen Elementary 1990 NO 6300 South 236th Street, Kent 98032 403 Panther Lake Elementary 1938 PL 20831-108th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 374 Park Orchard Elementary 1963 PO 11010 SE 232nd Street, Kent 98031 460 Pine Tree Elementary 1967 PT 27825-118th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 483 Ridgewood Elementary 1987 RW 18030-162nd Place SE, Renton 98058 462 Sawyer Woods Elementary 1994 SW 3t135-2281h Avenue SE,Kent 98042 483 Scenic Hill Elementary 1960 SH 26025 Woodland Way South, Kent 98031 406 Sods Creek Elementary 1971 SC 12651 SE 218th Place, Kent 98031 444 Spnngbrook Elementary 1969 SB 20035-100th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 416 Sunrise Elementary 1992 SR 22300-132nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042 506 Elementary TOTAL 12,521 Cedar Heights Junior High 1993 CH 19640 SE 272 Street,Covington 98042 949 Kent Junior High 1952 KJ 620 North Central Avenue, Kent 98032 816 Mattson Junior High 1981 MA 16400 SE 251 st Street, Covington 98042 808 Meeker Junior High 1970 MK 12600 SE 192nd Street, Renton 98058 890 Meridian Junior High 1958 MJ 23480-120th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 747 Northwood Junior High 1996 NW 17007 SE 184th Street, Renton 98056 944 Sequoia Junior High 1966 SJ 11000 SE 264th Street, Kent 98031 830 Junior High TOTAL 5,9B4 Kent-Mendian Senior High 1951 KM 10020 SE 256th Street, Kent 98031 1,417 Kentlake Senior High School 1997 KL 21401 SE 300th Street,Kent 98042 1,622 Kentndge Senior High 1968 KR 12430 SE 208th Street, Kent 98031 1,301 Kentwood Senior High 1981 KW 25800-1641h Avenue SE, Covington 98042 1,291 Senior High TOTAL 6,631 Kent Mountain View Academy 1 1965 LC 22420 Military Road, Des Moines 98198 416 DISTRICT TOTAL 24,552 Changes to capacity reflect program changes and continued reduction in class size for Academic Achievement Initiative 728 Kent Mountain View Academy serves grades K-12 This school was formerly known as Kent Learning Center 8 Grandview Elementar Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 3 April 2003 Page 12 I V Inventory and Capacity of Existing Schools Currently, the District has permanent program capacity to house 24,552 students and transitional (relocatable) capacity to house 2,051. This capacity is based on the District's Standard of Service as set forth in Section I I I. Included in this Plan is an inventory of the District's schools by type, address and current capacity. (See Table 3 on Page 12) The program capacity is periodically updated for changes in programs and the addition of new schools. It also reflects the Student Achievement Initiative 728 reduction in class size from 22:1 to 20:1 in grades K - 3 and Grade 4 reductions of 20:1 at impact schools or 23:1 for non-impact schools. The class size reduction received voter approval in the Educational Programs and Operations Levy as well as through funding from Student Achievement Initiative 728. The District will conduct annual public review and update class size recommendations in accordance with the requirements and incremental funding of Student Achievement Initiative 728. Kent Mountain View Academy (formerly Kent Learning Center) serves grades Kindergarten through 12 with transition, choice and home school assistance programs. It is located in the former Grandview School in the western part of the District in the city of SeaTac. This school was designed and is currently configured as an elementary school. Calculation of Elementary, Junior High and Senior High School capacities are set forth in Appendices A, B and C. A map of existing schools is included on Page 13. Kent School District six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2003 Page 11 I I I Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" (continued) Identified students will also be provided other education opportunities in classrooms for programs designated as follows: Computer Labs English Language Learners (E L L) Integrated Programs & Resource Rooms (for special remedial assistance) Preschool and Daycare Programs Honors (Gifted) and Advanced Placement Programs Basic Skills Programs Traffic Safety Education JROTC - Junior Reserve Officers Training Corps Variety of Career and Technical Education Programs (Vocational Education) i.e. Home & Family Life (Cooking, Sewing, Child Development, etc.) Business Education (Keyboarding, Accounting, Business Law, Sales & Marketing, etc ) Woods, Metals, Welding, Electronics, Manufacturing Technology, Auto Shop, Commercial Foods, Commercial Art, Drafting & Drawing, Electronics, Careers,etc. Many of these programs and others require specialized classroom space which can reduce the permanent capacity of the school buildings. In addition, an alternative home school assistance, choice and transition program is provided for students in grades K - 12 at Kent Mountain View Academy. Space or Classroom Utilization As a result of scheduling conflicts for student programs, the need for specialized rooms for certain programs, and the need for teachers to have a work space during their planning periods, it is not possible to achieve 100% utilization of regular teaching stations. Based on the analysis of actual utilization of classrooms, the District has determined that the standard utilization rate is 85% for secondary schools. Program capacity at elementary schools has been adjusted from 95% utilization in the past to reflect 100% utilization at the elementary level. In the future, the District will continue close analysis of actual utilization. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2003 Page 10 I I I Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" (continued) Identified students will also be provided other educational opportunities in classrooms for programs designated as follows: English Language Learners (E L L) Self-contained Special Education Programs Integrated Programs & Resource Rooms (for special remedial assistance) Education for Disadvantaged Students (Title I) Gifted Education District Remediation Programs Learning Assisted Programs (LAP) School Adjustment Programs for severely behavior-disordered students Hearing Impaired Mild, Moderate and Severe Developmental Disabilities Developmental Kindergarten Early Childhood Education (ECE) (3-4 yr. old students with disabilities) Some of the above special programs require specialized classroom space, as well as music and physical education classrooms, computer labs, etc.; thus, the permanent capacity of some of the buildings housing these programs is reduced. Some students, for example, leave their regular classroom for a short period of time to receive instruction in these special programs and space must be allocated to serve these programs. Some newer buildings have been constructed to accommodate most of these programs; some older buildings have been modified, and in some circumstances, these modifications reduce the classroom capacity of the buildings. When programs change, program capacity fluctuates and is updated annually to reflect the change in program and capacity. Current Standards of Service for Secondary Students The standards of service outlined below reflect only those programs and educational opportunities provided to secondary students which directly affect the capacity of the school buildings. Reductions have been made in 7th and 10th grade English classes for Initiative 728. These standards are subject to change pending annual updates based on staff and public review for changes funded by Student Achievement Initiative 728. Class size for grades 7 - 9 should not exceed an average of 29 students. Class size for 7th & IOth grade English class should not exceed an average of 25 students. Class size for grades 10 - 12 should not exceed an average of 31 students. Special Education for students with disabilities may be provided in a self- contained classroom with a capacity of 10-15 depending on the program. (continued) Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2003 Page 9 I I I Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" (continued) Identified students will also be provided other educational opportunities in classrooms for programs designated as follows: English Language Learners (E L L) Self-contained Special Education Programs Integrated Programs & Resource Rooms (for special remedial assistance) Education for Disadvantaged Students (Title I) Gifted Education District Remediation Programs Learning Assisted Programs (LAP) School Adjustment Programs for severely behavior-disordered students Hearing Impaired Mild, Moderate and Severe Developmental Disabilities Developmental Kindergarten Early Childhood Education (ECE) (3-4 yr. old students with disabilities) Some of the above special programs require specialized classroom space, as well as music and physical education classrooms, computer labs, etc.; thus, the permanent capacity of some of the buildings housing these programs is reduced. Some students, for example, leave their regular classroom for a short period of time to receive instruction in these special programs and space must be allocated to serve these programs. Some newer buildings have been constructed to accommodate most of these programs; some older buildings have been modified, and in some circumstances, these modifications reduce the classroom capacity of the buildings. When programs change, program capacity fluctuates and is updated annually to reflect the change in program and capacity. Current Standards of Service for Secondary Students The standards of service outlined below reflect only those programs and educational opportunities provided to secondary students which directly affect the capacity of the school buildings. Reductions have been made in 7th and 10th grade English classes for Initiative 728. These standards are subject to change pending annual updates based on staff and public review for changes funded by Student Achievement Initiative 728. Class size for grades 7 - 9 should not exceed an average of 29 students. Class size for 7th & 10d' grade English class should not exceed an average of 25 students. Class size for grades 10 - 12 should not exceed an average of 31 students. Special Education for students with disabilities may be provided in a self- contained classroom with a capacity of 10-15 depending on the program. (continued) Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2003 Page 9 III Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" In order to determine the capacity of the District's facilities, King County Code 21A.06 refers to a "standard of service" that each school district must establish in order to ascertain its overall capacity. The standard of service identifies the program year, the class size, the number of classrooms, students and programs of special need, and other factors determined by the District which would, in the District's judgment, best serve the student population. This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. The District has identified schools with significant special needs programs as "impact" schools and the standard of service targets a lower class size at those facilities. Relocatables included in the capacity calculation use the same standard of service as the permanent facilities. (see appendix a, s & C) The standard of service defined herein may continue to change in the future. Kent School District is continuing a long-term strategic planning process combined with review of changes to capacity and standard of service adjustments to meet the requirements of Student Achievement Initiative 728. This process will affect various aspects of the District's "standard of service" and future changes will be reflected in future capital facilities plans. Because the funding for Initiative 728 is incremental, implementation of the Initiative is also incremental and may result in annual changes to school capacity. Current Standards of Service for Elementary Students Class size for grades K - 3 should not exceed an average of 20 students. Class size for grade 4 at impact schools should not exceed an average of 20 students. Class size for grade 4 at non-impact schools should not exceed an average of 23 students. Class size for grades 5 - 6 should not exceed an average of 29 students. Program capacity for regular education classrooms is calculated at an average of 23 students per classroom because there are five grade levels at K - 4 and fluctuations between primary and intermediate grade levels (i.e. third/fourth grade split classes, etc.). Many elementary schools now provide full day kindergarten programs with the second half of the day funded by grants or tuition. Students have scheduled time in a computer lab. Students may also be provided music instruction and physical education in a separate classroom or facility. Special Education for students with disabilities may be provided in a self- contained classroom with a capacity of 10-15 depending on the program. (continued) Kent School District six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2003 Page 8 CONSENT CALENDAR 6. City Council Action: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds to approve Consent Calendar Items A through .r Discussion b Action 6A. Approval of Minutes. Approval of the minutes of the regular Council meeting of September 2, 2003. 6B. Approval of Bills. Not approved at time of printing. • Council Agenda Item No. 6 A-B • KEN T Kent City Council Meeting September 2, 2003 The regular meeting of the Kent City Council was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor White. Councilmembers present: Clark, Epperly, Orr, White, Woods and Yingling. Councilmember Peterson was excused from the meeting. Approximately 30 people were in attendance. (CFN-198) CHANGES TO AGENDA A. From Council.Administration or Staff. (CFN-198) CAO Martin removed pending litigation from the Executive Session. The Mayor requested that Item 7A be heard after the Executive Session. B. From the Public. (CFN-198) At the request of Bob O'Brien, Continued Communications Item I 1 A was added. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS A. Employee of the Month. (CFN-147) Mayor White announced that Kurt Palowez and Jim Cordova of the Public Works Engineering Division have been chosen as Employees of the Month for September. CONSENT CALENDAR WOODS MOVED to approve Consent Calendar Items A though N. Orr seconded and the motion carried. A. Approval of Minutes. (CFN-198) The minutes of the regular meeting of August 19, 2003, were approved. B. Approval of Bills. (CFN-104) Payment of the bills received through August 15 and paid on August 15 after auditing by the Operations Committee on August 19, 2003, were approved. Approval of checks issued for vouchers- Date Check Numbers Amount 8/15/03 Wire Transfers 1480-1491 $10,132,988.73 8/15/03 Prepays & 551891 1,889,797.23 8/15/03 Regular 552550 1,148,498.47 $13,171,284.43 Approval of interim checks: Date Check Numbers Amount 8/8/03 Interim Checks 272059 $ 58.64 8/12/03 Interim Checks 272060-272062 128.50 8/13/03 Interim Checks 272063-272067 1,02765 $1,214.79 C. LID 356, 111th Avenue SE Sanitary Sewers Ordinance, (CFN-1280) Ordinance No. 3657 establishing Local Improvement District C'LID") 356 was adopted. 1 Kent City Council Minutes September 2, 2003 D. Rodenhauser Latecomer Agreement. (CFN-485) Darrell Rodenhauser has extended the sanitary sewer main to serve his property along SE 274`' Street including three additional lots. Two owners have negotiated directly with Mr. Rodenhauser to pay their proportion of the cost. The Public Works Director was authorized to execute a sewer latecomer agreement with Darrell Rodenhauser for the Rodenhauser sewer extension. E. Sensitive Area Ouitclaim Deed from The Boeing Company. (CFN-1038) Approximately 10.98 acres of real property located at the Northeast intersection of S. 196`h Street and 72"d Ave. S. was accepted from the Boeing Company by sensitive area quitclaim deed, subject to the City Attorney's and the Public Works Director's concurrence of the language therein. F. State Grant for Commute Trip Reduction Program. (CFN-171sf) The Mayor was authorized to sign the Commute Trip Reduction Implementation Grant Agreement, upon concurrence of the language therein by the City Attorney. G. Six-Year Transportation Improvement Plan. (CFN-164) September 16, 2003,was set as the Public Hearing date for adoption of the Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program (2004—2009). H. South 277th Street Improvement Project. (CFN-171sf) The South 277'h Street Improvement project was accepted as complete and the retainage to Mid Mountain Contractors, Inc. is to be released upon standard releases from the State and release of any liens. I. 2003 Asphalt Overlays Project. (CFN-103) The 2003 Asphalt Overlays projectwas accepted as complete and the retainage to Western Asphalt is to be released upon standard releases from the State and release of any liens. J. 2004 Budget, Capital Facilities Plan Amendment and School District Capital Facilities Plan Updates. (CFN-961,775&377) September 16, 2003 was set as the date for public hearings to consider the 2004 budget, amendment of the Capital Facilities Element of the Kent Comprehensive Plan, and amendment of Chapter 12.13 Kent City Code to incorporate updated Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent and Federal Way School Districts, addition of the Capital Facilities Plan of the Auburn School District, and changes to adopted school impact fees. K. Excused Absence for Councilmember Peterson. (CFN-198) An excused absence from the September 2, 2003 City Council meeting for Councilmember Peterson, was approved. L. Amendment to Delinquent Accounts Ordinance. (CFN-104) Ordinance No. 3658 amending Ch. 3.10 of the Kent City Code regarding delinquent accounts and the assessment of penalties and interest, was adopted. M. City Credit Card Use Clarification Resolution. (CFN-104) Resolution No. 1653 clarifying City credit card use for authorized non-travel related purchases was adopted. N. First Half 2003 Budget Amendment Ordinance. (CFN-186) Ordinance No. 3659 approving the gross consolidating budget adjustment totaling $15,851,033 for budget adjustments made between January 1, 2003 and June 20, 2003 was adopted. 2 Kent City Council Minutes September 2, 2003 . BIDS A. Pacific Highway South HOV Lanes— South Phase— S. 272nd Street to S. 252nd Street— Joint Utility Trench. (CFN-1038) The bid opening for this project was held on August 19, 2003 with three bids received. The low bid was submitted by Pilchuck Diversified Services in the amount of$1,136,744.30. The Engineer's estimate was $1,196,128.38. The Public Works Director recommends awarding this contract to Pilchuck Diversified Services. CLARK SO MOVED. Yingling seconded and the motion carried. B. Water Treatment Chemical Supply For 2003-2004—Sodium Fluoride. (CFN-675) The bid opening for this project was held on August 18, 2003 with four bids received. The low bid was submitted by Cascade Columbia Distribution Company in the amount of$29,180.16. The Public Works Director recommends awarding this contract to Cascade Columbia Distribution Company. CLARK SO MOVED. White seconded and the motion carried. REPORTS C. Public Safety Committee. (CFN-198) Epperly noted that the next meeting will be held at 5:00 p.m. on September 9th. E. Planning Committee. (CFN-198) Orr noted that the next meeting will be held at 3.00 p.m. on September 16th. F. Parks Committee. (CFN-198) Woods noted that the next meeting will be at 4:00 p.m. on September 9 . G. Administrative Reports. (CFN-198) Martin reminded Council members of an Executive Session of approximately 15 minutes with no action expected afterward. CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS A. Citizen Survey Report. (CFN-198) Bob O'Brien, 1131 Seattle St., suggested eliminating the Citizen Survey report in 2004, having a public hearing regarding a potential $40,000,000 bond issue, and looking locally for an Information Technology Director. OTHER BUSINESS A. Owest Conditional Use Appeal Closed Record Hearing CE-2001-3. (CFN-1281) Mayor White noted that the Hearing Examiner's Decision on Remand was issued on May 10, 2003, and that this is a closed record appeal of the decision. City Attorney Brubaker explained that this is a quasi-judicial hearing, that there is a conflict of interest for the City of Kent and the City Attorney's Office, and that Michael Walter of Keating Bucklin & McCormack will represent the City Council. Walter suggested having an executive session of approximately 15 minutes to discuss legal matters. The meeting recessed at 7:42 p.m. and reconvened at 8:14 p.m. Mayor White turned the chainnanship over to Council President Woods. Mr. Walter questioned the Council members about appearance of fairness issues, and asked if others had disclosures to make. There were no other comments or objections. Paul Morford, P. O. Box 6345, Kent, 98064, said there would be detriment to his property and provided copies of pictures of the site, which are already in the record. His attorney, Michael 3 Kent City Council Minutes September 2, 2003 Hanis, of Hanis Greaney Zoro, 6703 S.234`h Street,Kent, explained their position and stated that the Hearing Examiner made an error of law. Mike Witek, of Helsell Fetterman, representing Qwest, explained their position and said that the appellant cannot show that the Qwest second floor addition would damage or injure his property in any way that a permitted use would not. Kim Adams Pratt, Assistant City Attorney, explained the City's position and noted that staff still supports the recommendation made to the Hearing Examiner in 2001, and feels it is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. Hanis disagreed with some of Pratt's comments, and said the Council doesn't have enough information to make a decision. At 9:15 p.m., the meeting recessed to Executive Session for approximately 30 minutes. It reconvened at 9:45 p.m. ORR MOVED to affirm the Hearing Examiner's decision to deny the appeal of May 10, 2002, and to affinn the subsequent Hearing Examiner decisions on that appeal. Clark seconded and, after comments from some Council members regarding their decision, the motion carried 5 to 1, with Epperly opposed. ADJOURNMENT (CFN-198) At 9:55 p.m., WOODS MOVED to adjourn. Orr seconded and the motion carved. a-Gd-�it�L� Brenda Jacober, C City Clerk 4 Kent City Council Meeting Date September 16, 2003 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: LOCAL AGENCY AGREEMENT WITH WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR S. 228TH STREET RAILROAD GRADE SEPARATIONS PROJECT—AUTHORIZE 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works Committee, authorization for the Mayor to sign the Local Agency Agreement and Local Agency Federal Aid Prospectus for the South 228th Street Grade Separation Project, subject to the Public Works Director's concurrence of the language therein, and to establish a budget for same. 3. EXHIBITS: Public Works Director memorandum and agreement • 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner,Commission, etc.) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 6C PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Don E. Wickstrom, P.E. Public Works Director • Phone: 253-856-5500 K E N T Fax 253-856-6500 W�S H I N G T O N Address. 220 Fourth Avenue S. Kent,WA 98032-5895 DATE: Sept b\ r 15, 2003 TO: Ma ate and Kent City Council FROM: Don ickstrom, Public Works Director THROUGH: SUBJECT: Local Agency Agreement for 2281h Street Grade Separations Project MOTION: Recommend authorizing the Mayor to sign the Local Agency Federal Aid Prospectus and Local Agency Agreement for the South 228th Street Grade Separation Project upon concurrence of the language therein by the Public Works Director and the City Attorney and to establish a budget for same along with directing staff to spend the money accordingly. SUMMARY: Authorize the Mayor to sign the Local Agency Federal Aid Prospectus and Local Agency Agreement in order to receive a $1 million grant from FHWA (Federal Highway Administration) for the South 228`h Street Grade Separations Project. BUDGET IMPACT: No Unbudgeted Fiscal/Personnel Impact BACKGROUND: This is a $l million grant administered through FAST from FHWA to begin preliminary engineering on the South 228`h Street Grade Separations Project. There is no local match required. We have place this item on the September 16`h Council meeting agenda, upon the Committees concurrence, due to the short window of time allowed to return the signed agreement to Transportation Improvement Board. Mayor White and Kent City Council Local Agency Agreement-Authorize September 15,2003 1 � Washington State Local Agency Federal Aid vI/ Department of Transportation Project Prospectus Prefix Route ( ) Federal Aid Protect Number Date 7/30/2003 Local Agency WSDOT Federal Employer Protect Number 02-3013 (Use Only Tax ID Number 91-6001254 Agency Federal Program Title City of Kent ® 20 205 ❑ 20 209 ❑ Other Protect Title Stan Latitude N41.23',5I" Start Longitude W122,14',34" S.228th St. Railroad Grade Separations End Latitude N47.23',51" End Longitude W 122,13'.58" Protect Termini From To 700 feet west of the Union Pacific Railroad Tracks 1 700 feet east of the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad From: To: Length of Protect Award Type 0.5 mt I ® Local ❑ Local Forces ❑ State ® Railroad Federal Agency City Number County Number County Name WSDOT Region ® FHWA ❑ Others 0615 17 1 King I NW Congressional District Legislative Districts Urban Area Number TMA I MPO I RTPO 8,9 1 5,31,33,47 1 ] 1 MPOIPSRC Total Local Agency Federal Funds Phase Start Phase Estimated Cost Funding Date (Nearest Hundred Dollar) (Nearest Hundred Dollar) (Nearest Hundred Dollar) Month Year P.E. $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Sept 2003 R/W Const. Total $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Description of Existing Facility (Existing Design and Present Condition) Roadway Width Number of Lanes 46 feet 1 4 Currently, S.228th St is 4-lanes wide,approximately 46 feet in H idth with separate left turn pockets at the intersections The Union Pacific and Burlington Northern Santa Fe railroad tracks cross the road at grade.The UP has one mainline track crossing the road and the BNSF has two mainline tracks and one spur track crossing the road. Sidewalks exist in some locations predominantly on the south side of the road No bile lanes exist in the vicinity Drive Aays to businesses connect to the roadway in several locations Description of Proposed Work Roadway Width Number of Lanes ® New Construction ❑3-13 ❑ 2-R 48 feet 4 The project will grade separate the Burlington Northern Santa Fe and Union Pacific railroad tracks at S.228th Street via under-crossings.The railroads will operate on bridge structures constructed at the existing track grade Associated improvements include driveway improvements to accommodate the under-crossings as well as curbs, gutters, sides%alks,storin drainage,pump stations, and lighting Local Agency Contact Person Title Phone Mark Madfai Senior Project Engineer 253-856-5521 Mailing Address City State Zip Code 220 41h Ave. S. Kent WA 98032-5895 Design Approval By Approving Professional Engineer Title Date DOT Form 140-101 EF Page 1 of 3 ■Supersedes Previous Editions■ Revised 1212002 Agency Protect Title Date City of Kent S 228th St. Railroad Grade Separations 7/30(2003 Geometric Design Data Description_— —— Through Route —_ _Crossroad__ _ Principal Arterial I ❑Principal Arterial Federal ®Urban ®Minor Arterial ❑ Urban ❑Minor Arterial ❑Collector ❑Collector Functional - - - -- — ❑Major Collector ❑ Major Collector Classification ❑ Rural ❑Access Slreel/Road ❑ Rural ❑Access Street/Road Terrain_ _ _ — ®Flat ❑ Roll ❑Mountain —❑ Flat ❑Roll ❑Mountain Posted Speed 35 MPH Des_rgn Speed 40A1PH -- _— — Existing ADT _ 9000_ Design Year ADT _ 14000 Design Year _ __ 2020 _— Design Hourly Volume(DHV) I500 Accident - 3 Year Experience Property Injury Accidents — Fatal Accidents i Total Number Year Damage Number of Number of Number of I Number of of Accidents Accidents Accidents Injuries Accidents i Fatalities 1999 — -- —---- -- --- 1 20002001 -------- --- -- - ---- --- ------ ---t-- — Performance of Work Preliminary Engineering Will Be Performed By Others Agency Agency and consultants 70 % 30 % Construction Will Be Performed By Contract Agency l00 Environmental Classification ❑Final ®Preliminary ❑ Class I-Environmental Impact Statement(EIS) ® Class II-Categorically Excluded(CE) ❑ Project involves NEPA/SEPA Section 404 ® Projects Requiring Documentation Interagency Agreement (Documented CE) ❑ Class III- Environmental Assessment(EA) ❑ Project Involves NEPA/SEPA Section 404 Interagency Agreement Environmental Considerations The undercrossing at the BNSF tracks are adjacent to a portion of Mill Creek. The project will require this to be protected during construction. A box cuh,ert at a driveway may need to be replaced Wetlands exist in the roadway ditches north and south of the roadway. No filling of wetlands is anticipated to occur as a result of this project. Noise and air quality will be addressed in the BA and may be affected due to an increase in traffic, although the reduction in traffic delays at the tracks and the associated train noise may decrease the noise and air impacts. DOT Form 140-101 EF Page 2 of 3 Revised 1212002 Agency Project Title Dale City of Kent S 228th St Railroad Grade Separations 7/3012003 Right of Way ®No Right of Way Required ❑Right of Way Required ' All construction required by the contract can be accomplished ❑ No Relocation ❑Relocation Required within the existing right of way, i Description of Utility Relocation or Adjustments and Exisling Major Structures Involved in the Project At the BNSF and UP crossings there are various underground utilities that will need to be relocated including fiber optic lines for Qwest,Sprint, MCI,360 Networks, Level 3, and Multimedia as well as the railroads' own communication fiber.The Olympic Pipeline alongside the UP tracks will also need to be relocated. FAA Involvement Is any airport located within 3 2 kilometers (2 miles)of the proposed project? ❑ Yes ® No Remarks This project has been reviewed by the legislative body of the administration agency or agencies, or it's designee, and is not inconsistent with the agency's comprehensive plan for community development Agency City of Kent Date By _ ---------- -- -- --- -- -- ---- — MayorlChairperson -——--------- DOT Form 140-101 EF Page 3 of 3 Revised 1212002 Arnow w7wWashington State Local Agency Agreement Department of Transportation Agency City of Kent CFDA No. 20.205 - _ _—_-___ _ _ __ __ _—___ (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance) Address 220 4th Ave. S_ - - -_ Project No. Kent, WA. 98032-5895 - -- _-- Agreement No. For OSC WSDOT Use Only The Local Agency hav mg complied,or hereby agreeing to comply,w nh the terms and conditions set forth in(1)Title 23,U S Code Highuays,(2)the regulations issued pursuant thereto,(3)Office of Management and Budget Circulars A-102,A-87 and A-133,(4)the policies and procedures promulgated by the Washington State Department of Transportation,and(5)the federal aid project agreement entered into between the State and Federal Government,relative to the aboi a project,the Washington State Department of Transportation w ill authorize the Local Agency to proceed on the project by a separate notification Federal funds which are to be obligated for the project may not exceed the amount shown herein on line r,column 3,is ithout smtien authority by the State,subject to the approt al of the federal Highway Administration All project costs not reimbursed by the Federal Go%cmment shall be the responsibility of the Local Agency Project Description Name S. 228th St. Railroad Grade Separations Length 0 5 mi Termini 700 feet west of the Union Pacific 700 feet east of the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad Tracks Description of Work The project will grade separate the Union Pacific and Burlington Northern Santa Fe railroad tracks at S. 228th Street via two under-crossings. Both railroads will operate on bridge structures over the roadxvay. Associated improvements include driveway improvements to accommodate the under-crossings as well as curbs, gutters, sidewalks, storm drainage, pump stations, and lighting. Estimate of Funding Type of Work - -- (�) —i (2) -- (3) ----- Estimated Total Estimated Agency Estimated Project Funds Funds Federal Funds PE _a Agency __ - - __ --295,000 001 - -_ _ 295.000 00 -- -- % _b Other- consultant - 700.000 00 _ _ 700 000 00 c Other Federal d. State 5,000 001 5 000 00 Participation --- - -- — ----- — -- -- - -- L-- Ratio for PE a Total PE Cost Estimate a+b+c+d 1,000,000.00' 1,000,000.00 Right of Way i Agency --- ---- - - -- - - - - - - % g Other Federal Aid h Other --- - ------ --—-- L --- - ---� 1.State --- --- --- — -- -- I — — -- - --- — - -- --- Participation — Ratio for RW - Total R!W Cost Estimate f+ +h+i Construction k Contract_ I. Other m Other I -------',---- -- --- n Other % _o Agency--- --- -- - - - - - - - � --- Federal Aid --- - - — - — --- --i — - — --- Participation _P_State - Ratio for CN q Total CN Cost Estimate k+l+m+n+o+ r.Total Project Cost Estimate (e+j+q) 1,000,000.001 1,000,000.00 Agency Official Washington State Department of Transportation By - - -- - - -- - - - By - -- - - - ---- -- -- Title Jim-White, Mayo[ _ _ Assistant Secretary for Highways and Local Programs Date Executed DOT Form 140-039 EF Revised 10/02 Construction Method of Financing (Check Method Selected) State Ad and Award ❑ Method A-Advance Payment-Agency Share of total construction cost(based on contract award) ❑Method B-Withhold from gas tax the Agency's share of total construction cost(line 4,column 2)to the amount of $ _ ____ _ _ at$ _ _ per month for _ _ months. Local Force or Local Ad and Award ®Method C-Agency cost incurred with partial reimbursement The Local Agency further stipulates that pursuant to said Title 23, regulations and policies and procedures,and as a condition to payment of the federal funds obligated,it accepts and will comply with the applicable provisions set forth below Adopted by official action on Resolution/Ordinance No. Provisions I. Scope of Work 1 Pnhmmary engineering The Agency shall pro%ide all the work,labor,materials,and sen ices necessary 2 Right oruay acquisition to perform the project which is described and set forth in detail in the"Project 3 Protect construction Description"and"Type of Work" When the State acts for and on behalf of the Agency,the State shall be deemed in the c%cni thal right of way acquisition,or actual construction of the road•for an agent of the Agency and shall perfonn the sen ices described and indicated in t`hich preliminary engineering is undertaken is not started by the closing of the tenth "Type of Work"on the lace of this agreement,in accordance%%nh plans and Fiscal year follo%%Ing the fiscal year in w hich the agreement is executed,the Agency Specifications as proposed by the Agency and approved by the State and the 't'll repay to the State the sum or sums of federal funds paid to the Agency under the Federal Highway Administration terms of this agreement(see Section iN) %%hen the State acts for the Agency but is not subject to the right ofcontrol b The Agency agrees that all stages of construction necessary to pro%ide the initially the Agency,the State shall ha%e the nghl to perform the work subject to the y Planned complete facility wnbin The limits of this project w ill conform to a(least the ordinary procedures of the State and Federal Highway Administration minimum%alucs set by approed stmeu ide design standards applicable to this class of highways,e%en though such additional work is financed without federal aid It. Delegation of Authority panicipation The State is%%)Ilmg to fulfill the responsibilities to the Federal Go%ernment by The Agency agrees that on federal aid highway construction projects,the current the admimsirabon of this project The Agency agrees that the State shall ha%e the federal aid regulations which apply to liquidated damages rclati%e to the basis of full authority to carry out this administration The State shall re%iew,process,and federal participation in the project cost shall be applicable in the c%enl the contractor approve documents required for federal aid reimbursement in accordance with fails to complete the contract within the contract time lederal requirements If the State ad%eriises and awards the contract.the State will further act for the Agency in all matters concerning the project as requested Vi. Payment and Partial Reimbursement by the Agency If the Local Agency ad%ertises and awards the project,the State The total cost of the project,including all re%iew and engineering cosis.ind shall re%rew the%%ork to ensure conformity u nh the appro%ed plans and other expenses of the State,is to be paid by the Agency and by the Federal specifications Go%emment Federal funding shall be in accordance with the Transportation 111. Project Administration Equity Act for the 21 st Century(TEA 21).as amended,and Office of Management and Budget circulars A-102,A-87 and A-133 The State shall not Certain ry pes of work and sen ices shall be pro%tded by the State on this be ultimately responsible for any of the costs of the project The Agency shall be Project as requested by the Agency and described in the Type of Work abo%e In ultimately responsible for all costs associated a mh the project a hich are not addition,the State w ill furnish qualified personnel for the supcn icon and reimbursed by the Federal Go%cmment Nothing in this agreement shall be inspection of the work in progress On Local Agency ad%ertised and awarded construed as a promise by the State as to the amount or nature of federal Projects,the supervision and inspection shall be limited to ensuring all cork is in Participation in this project conformance with approved plans,specifications,and federal aid requirements The Agency shall bill the state for federal aid project costs incurred in confornnly The salary of such engineer or other super isor and all other salaries and costs %%rlh applicable federal and stale laws The agency shall nnmirrize the time elapsed incurred by State forces upon the project u Ill be considered a cost thereof All belueen receipt of federal aid funds and subsequent payment of incurred costs costs related to this project incurred by employees of the State in the customary Expenditures by the Local Agency for maintenance,general administration, manner on highway payrolls and%ouchers shall be charged as costs of the project supcn aion,and other o%crhead shall not be eligible for federal participation unless an indirect cost plan has been approved by WSDOT IV. Availability of Records The State w ill pay for State incurred costs on the project Follouing All project records in support of all costs Incurred and actual e%penditures payment,the State shall bill the Federal Go%cmmcni for reimbursement of kept by the Agency are to he maintained in accordance with local go%emment those costs eligible for federal participation to the extent that such costs are accounting procedures prescribed by the Washington Stale Auditor's Office, attributable and properfy allocable to this project The State shall bill the the U S Deparlmeni of Transportation,and the Washington State Department Agency for that portion of State costs u hich%%ere not reimbursed by the of Tran%porlation The records shall be open to inspection by the State and Federal Govemment(see Section IN) Federal Go%emmcnt at all reasonable times and shall be retained and made available for such inspection for a period of not less than three years from the I• Project Construction Costs final payment of any federal aid funds to the Agency Copies of said records Project construction financing w ill be accomplished by one of the three shall be furnished to the Stale and/or Federal Go%cmment upon request methods as indicated in this agreement V. Compliance with Provisions The Agency shall not incur any federal aid participation costs on any classification of work on this project until authorized in writing by the State for each classification The classifications of work for projects are 40 DOT Form 140-039 EF 2 Revised 10102 Method 4,—The Agency%sill place%%ith the State,wnhm(20)days after the X. Traffic Control,Signing, Marking,and Roadway execution of the construction contract,an advance in the amount of the Maintenance Agency's share of the total construction cost based on the contract a%%ard The State w ill nolif) the Agency of the exact amount to be deposited w A the State The Agency%%ill not permit any changes to be made in the pro%isions for parking The State%%ill pay all costs incurred under the contract upon presentation of regulations and traffic control on this project%%iihout prior ippro%al of the State and progress billings from the contractor Following such payments,the State will federal Highway Administration The Agency%%ill not install or permit to be submit a billing to the federal Go%emment for the federal aid participation installed any signs,signals,or markings not in conformance%%ith the standards share of the cost \Then the project is substantially completed and final actual appro%ed by the Federal Highway Administration and h1UTCD The Aeency%mill, costs of the project can be determined,the State%%ill present the Agcncy%%ith a at its own expense,maintain the impro%emeni co%cred by this agreement final billing showing the amount due the State or the amount due the Agency This billing x%ill be cleared by either a payment from the Agency to the State or XI. Indemnity by a refund from the State to the Agency The Agency shall hold the Federal Go%cmment and the State harmless from and shall process and defend at its oxen expense all claims,demands,or suits,w hether at Dlelhod D— The Agency's share of the total construction cost as shown on law or equity brought against the Agency,State,or Federal Government.arising the face of this agreement shall be%%ithheld from its monthly fuel tax from the Agency's execution,performance,or failure to perform any of the allotments.The face of this agreement establishes the months in w hick the prat isions of this agreement,or of any other agreement or contract connected w nh w dhholding shall tale place and the exact amount to be w ithheld each month this agreement,or arising by reason of the participation of the State or Federal The extent of w ithholdmg%%ill be confirmed by letter from the Stale at the time Go%crnmem in the project,PROVIDED,nothing herein shall require the Agency to of contract award Upon receipt of progress billings from the contractor,the reimburse the State or the Federal Govemment for damages arising out of bodily State will submit such billings to the Federal Gm emmenl for pay men[of its injury to persons or damage to properly caused by or resulting from the sole participating portion of such billings negligence of the Federal Government or the State No linhility shall attach to the State or Federal Govemment except as expressly Method C—The Agency may submit%ouchers to the State in the format pioudrd herein prescribed by the State,in duplicate,not more than once per month for those costs eligible for Federal participation to the extent that such costs are directly XII. Nondiscrimination Provision attributable and properly allocable to this project Expenditures by the Local The Agency shall not discriminate on the basis of race,color,national ongin,or Agency for maintenance,general administration,supen ision,and other sex in the aw and and performance of any USDOT-assisted contract andior o%erhead shall not be eligible for Federal participation unless claimed under a agreement or in the administration of its DBE program or the requirements of 49 pre%iously approxed indirect cost plan CFR Part 26 The Agency shall take all necessary and reasonable steps under 49 CFR Pan 26 to ensure nondiscrimination in the award and administration of The State shall reimburse the Agency for the Federal share of eligible project a costs up t the amount shown the face of this agreement At the time of USDOT-assisted contracts and agreements The WSDOT's DBE program,as by audit,the Agency w ill provide documentation of all costs incurred on the required by 49 CFR Par[_6 and as entatppro%o of USDOT,is is a Ic 2l o li project reference m this agreement Implementation of this program is a Icgal obligation and failure to carry out its terms shall be treated as a%iolation of this agreement The Stale shall bill the Agency for all costs incurred by the State relam a to Upon notification to the Agency of its failure to carry out its approi ed program,the the project The State shall also bill the Agency for the federal funds paid by Department may impose sanctions as pro%ided for under Pan 26 and may,in the State to the Agency for project costs which are subsequently determined to appropriate cases,refer the matter for enforcement under 18 U S C 1001 andbr the be ineligible for federal participation(see Section IX) Program Fraud Ci%il Remedies Act of 1986(3) U S C 3801 et seq) VII. Audit of Federal Consultant Contracts The Agency,if sect ices of a consultant are required,shall be responsible for The Agency hereby aerecs that it w ill incorporate or cause to be incorporated into audit of the consultant's records to determine eligible federal aid costs on the any contract for construction work,or modification thereof,as defined in the rules project The report of said audit shall be in the Agency's files and made and regulations of the Secretary of Labor in 41 CFR Chapter 60,%%hich is paid for in a%ailable to the State and the Federal Government whole or in part with funds obtained from the Federal Government or borrowed on the credit of the Federal Govemment pursuant to a grant,contract,loan,insurance, An audit shall be conducted by the WSDOT Internal Audit Office in or guarantee or understanding pursuant to any federal program im oh mg such grant, accordance w ith generally accepted go%ernmental auditing standards as contract,loan,insurance,or guarantee,the required contract provisions for issued by the United States General Accounting Office by the Comptroller Federal-Aid Contracts(FHWA 1273),located in Chapter 44 of the Local Agency General of the United States,WSDOT Manual M 27-50,Consultant Guidelines Authorization,Selection,and Agreement Administration,memoranda of The Agency further agrees that it w ill be bound by the abo%e equal opportunity understanding between WSDOT and FHWA,and Office of Management and Budget Circular A-133 clause w nh respect to its own employment practices when it participates in federally assisted construction work Pro%ided,that tithe applicant so If upon audit it is found that merpayment or participation of federal participating is a State or Local Go%cmment,the abo%e equal opportunity clause money in ineligible items of cost has occurred,the Agency shall reimburse is not applicable to any agency,instrumentality,or subdn ision of such the State for the amount of such o%erpaymeni or excess participation(see go%emment w hich does not participate in work on or under[he contract Section IX) Vill. Single Audit Act The Agency also agrees The Agency,as a subrecipient of federal funds,shall adhere to the federal (1) To assist and cooperate actively w ith the State in obtaining the compliance of Office of Management and Budget(OMB)Circular A-133 as well as all contractors and subcontractors w ith the equal opportunity clause and rules, applicable federal and state statutes and regulations A subrecipient who regulations,and rcle%ant orders of the Secretary of Labor expends$300,000 or more in federal awards from all sources during a green local year shall ha%e a single or program-specific audit performed for that (2) To pumice the State such information n may require for the super i of year in accordance with the pro%isions of OMB Circular A-133 Upon such compliance and that it will otherwise assist the Stale in the discharge off its conclusion of the A-133 audit,the Agency shall be responsible for ensuring primary responsibility for securing compliance that a copy of the report is transmitted promptly to the State (3) To refrain from entering into any contract or contract modification subjettt to IX. Payment of Billing Executi%e Order 11246 of September 24,1965,with a contractor debarred from,or Y g who has not demonstrated eligibility for,go%emment contracts and federally The Agency agrees that if payment or arrangement for payment of any of assisted construction contracts pursuant to the Executne Order the State's billing relalixe to the project(e g,State force w ork,project cancellation,overpayment,cost ineligible for federal participation,eic)is not (4) To carry out such sanctions and penalties for%tolation of the equal made to the State w ithin 45 days after the Agency has been billed,the State opportunity clause as may be imposed upon contractors and subcontractors by the shall effect reimbursement of the total sum due from the regular monthly fuel State,federal Highway Administration,or the Secretary of Labor pursuant to fart tax allotments to the Agency from the Motor Vehicle Fund No additional 11,subpart D of the Execuln c Order Federal project funding w ill be appro%ed until full payment is recened unless otherwise directed the Assistant Secretary for Highways and Local Programs DOT Form 140-039 EF 3 Revised 10102 In addrtton,the Agency agrees that if it fails or refuses to comply%%nh these XV. Venue for Claims andfor Causes of Action undertakings,the State may take any or all of the follow ing actions For the corn emence of the parties to this contract,it is agreed that any claims (a) Cancel,terminate,or suspend this agreement in%+hole or in part, andior causes of action which the Local Agency has against the State of Washington,growing out of this contract or the project with which it is (b) Refrain from e%tending any further assistance to the Agency under the concerned,shall be brought only in the Superior Court for Thurston County program with respect to%%high the failure or refusal occurred until satisfactory assurance of future compliance has been recened from the Agency,and XVI. Certification Regarding the Restrictions of the Use (c) Refer the case to the Departnhent of Justice for appropriate legal proceedings of Federal Funds for Lobbying The approving authority certifies,to the best of his or her knowledge and , that X111. Liquidated Damages The Agency hereby agrees that the liquidated damages pro%isions of 23 CFR (1) undersigned, federal appropriated funds have been paid attempting%%ill paid,lu ore behalf Part 635,Subpart 127,as supplemented,relatne to the amount of Federal of the understgncd,to any person for icy,a influencing or r of to influence an officer or employee of any federal agency,a member of Congress,an officer or participation in the project cost,shall be applicable in the e%cot the contractor employee of Congress,or an employ ee of a member of Congress in connection%%nh fads to complete the contract%%ohm the contract time Failure to include the a%%ardmg of any federal contract,the making of any federal grant,the making of liquidated damages pro%ision will not relieve the Agency from reduction of any federal loan,the entering into of any cooperatne agreement,and the e%tension, federal participation in accordance w ith this paragraph continuation,renew m al,amendment,or modification of any federal contract grant, XIV. Termination for Public Convenience loan,orcooperame agreemcnl The Secretary of the Washington State Department of Transportation may (2) If any funds other than federal appropriated funds ha%e been paid or w ill be terminate the contract in whole,or from time to time in part,whene%er. paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any federal agency,a mcmher of Congress.an officer or employee of Congress, (I) The requisite federal funding becomes una%ailable through failure of or an employee of a member of Congress in connection with this federal contract, appropriation or olherw ise grant,loan,or cooperatne agreement,the undersigned shall complete and submit (2) The contractor is pre%entcd from proceeding with the work as a direct the Standard Form-LLL,"Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying;'in accordance result of an Execun%e Order of the President%%ith respect to the prosecution of with its instructions w or or in the interest of national defense,or an Erecunve Order of the (3) The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be President or Go%emor of the State%%ith respect to the preservation of energy included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers(including subgrants, resources and contracts and subcontracts under grants,subgrants,loans,and cooperative (3) The contractor is pre%entnd from proceeding w uh the work by reason of agreements)which exceed$100,000,and that all such subrecipicnis shall certify and disclose accordingly a preliminary,special,or permanent restraining order of a court of competent jurisdiction where the issuance of such order is primarily caused by the acts or This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was omissions of persons or agencies other than the contractor placed when this transaction was made or entered into Submission of this certification as a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by Section 1352,Title 31,U S Code Any person who fails to file the required (4) The Secretary determines that such termination is in the best interests of certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than S 10,000 and not more the State than S100,000 for each such failure Additional Provisions DOT Form 140-039 EF 4 Revised 10/02 A 3 e ti N f i r W W a' co i L - N N V uz Im_) N u _ � Q a (7 C') C 4 OD CD N V s. v r 3 _Z 0 J m `a 3 a � ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT SHEET /7 CITY OF KENT TYPICAL BRIDGE • N Rw SCALE NONE SECTION o KENT DRAWN c �......... APPROVED DATE 7-17-07 4 Q C PUTI(LE 1N BELLEVUE 0 T 2ENT SCALE IN ►RILESAC A 5 1BOTN sTTUKWILAO SCAL .71 NJ 19 700M sT ' -- —' -- --SEATAC: L- _SE 2DOTH 51 ... 'r G•^ 7-1 ` \ 1 _� - . ' -•.rr'�', ___—_ 2eC/ 'S i—_ s Ira - �i ' ' € -P .� UN NCORPORATED- - GRADE KING COUNTY 'SEPARATIONS "Al `-- * ST. I i ` , DES' ` - i Li " - MOINES - a ®�nl 'KENT ' ' I -I =' i" _- '- _ _' LNlks'9� .. - _ - - - - -1-_. •— X 7WM 5T s YEEHER'sr WrWs - •asnr �•lr i s l � IL > o 1 u I H 4F i E _l ' a In •y. ' �' � I' _ — — - s 277TH 57 i AUBURN ; FEDERAL i ' WAY ! --= 5 L L SH EEN�GINCERING DEPARTMENT C OF KENT • DRAWNw SULCs1+o*N VICINTY MAP T DAiE 7-17_03�PPNaVE • Kent City Council Meeting Date September 16, 2003 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DEPLOYMENT GRANT—ACCEPT 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works Committee, authorization for the Mayor to execute the Local Agency Agreement to accept the ITS Earmark grant from the Federal Highway Administration for Kent Intracity Transit Service, subject to the Public Works Director's concurrence of the language therein, and to establish a budget for same. 3. EXHIBITS: Public Works Director memorandum • 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 6D PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Don E. Wickstrom, P.E. Public Works Director Phone:253-856-5500 K E N T Fax 253-856-6500 W A S H I N G T O N Address: 220 Fourth Avenue S. Kent,WA. 98032-5895 DATE: September 9, 2003 TO: M%White and Kent City Council FROM: Do ckstrom, Public Works Director THROUGH: SUBJECT: ITS Earmark Grant ]MOTION: Recommend that the Council authorize the Mayor to execute the Local Agency Agreement to accept the ITS Earmark grant from Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) for $1,247,913 for Kent Intracity Transit Service and to establish a budget for same along i►ith directing staff to spend the money accordingly. SUMMARY: The City was able to obtain a federal earmark grant (S 1,247,913) to facilitate transit service in Kent, by improving access and circulation to the Kent Transit Center and expand the circulator service, recently initiated as a demonstration project with Kent and King County METRO partnering to provide a circulator shuttle to provide a transit link between Sounder commuter rail service and the employment centers in the industrial/manufacturing district north of the city center. We have placed this item on the September 16th Council Agenda, upon the Committee's concurrence, due to the short window of time allowed to return the signed agreement BUDGET IMPACT: No Unbudgeted Fiscal/Personnel Impact BACKGROUND: The funds from this grant will be combined with City funds to complete six components: 1) Intersection improvements at W. Smith Street and 4th Ave N, 2) Intersection improvements at W. Smith Street and 2nd Ave, 3) Intersection improvements at Central Avenue and Pioneer Street, 4) Intracity Transit Circulator Service, 5) Development of a Transit Plan, and 6)Interconnection (Intertie) of intersection traffic signals along Central Avenue with the BNSF Railroad Grade Crossing Signals. (S3,306,000 estimated total project cost - $1,247,913 from ITS earmark grant: $2,532,087 from City funds) Mayor White and Kent City Council ITS Grant Agreement-Authorize September 15, 2003 1 Washington State Local Agency Agreement Department of Transportation Agency City of Kent CFDA No. 20.205 ----- -- --- — (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance) Address 220 Fourth Avenue _ Project No. Kent, WA 98032-5895 Agreement No. For OSC WSDOT Use Only The Local Agency haw mg complied,or hereby agreeing to comply,w ith the terns and conditions set forth in(I)Title 23,U S Code Highways,(2)the regulations Issued pursuant thereto,(3)Office of Management and Budget Circulars A-102,A-87 and A-133,(4)the policies and procedures promulgated by the Washington State Department of Transportation,and(5)the federal aid project agreement entered into between the State and Federal Government,relative to the above project,the Washington State Department of Transportation will authorize the Local Agency to proceed on the project by a separate notification Federal funds which are to be obligated for the project may not exceed the amount shown herein on line r,column 3,without written authority by the Slate,subject to the approval of the Federal Highway Administration All project costs not reimbursed by the Federal Go%emment shall be the responsibility of the Local Agency Project Description Name Kent Intracity Transit Program Length Termini Citywide Description of Work The project consists of six components: Intersection improvements at W. Smith Street and 41h Ave N, Intersection improvements at W. Smith Street and 2nd Ave, Intersection improvements at Central Avenue and Pioneer Street, Intracity Transit Circulator Service, Development of a Transit Plan, and Interconnection(Intertie)of intersection traffic signals along Central Avenue with the BNSF Railroad Grade Crossing Signals. Estimate of Funding Type of Work (1) (2) (3) 1 Estimated Total Estimated Agency Estimated Project Funds Funds Federal Funds PE a Agency 2,246,000 00 1,092,662 001 1,153,33 378 % b_Other consultant ~ 270,000 001 179,200 00 _ 90,80 C. Other Non-participanhng 780,000001 780,000 00 j Federal Aid d. State 10,000 00 6,225 00, 3,77500 Participation -- -- Ratio for PE a Total PE Cost Estimate a+b+c+d 3,306,000.00 2,058,087.00 1,247,913.00 Right of Way _LA -- -- % _g. Other _ h Other _ Federal AidL State Participation - I - Ratio for RW i Total R/W Cost Estimate f+ +h+i Construction k. Contract I. Other m. Other n Other % o Agency Federal Aid P State Participation --- Ratio for CN q.Total CN Cost Estimate k+l+m+n+o+ r.Total Project Cost Estimate (e+j+q) j 3,306,000.001 2,058,087.001 1,247,913.00 Agency Official Washington State Department of Transportation By -- By _ Title _ Assistant Secretary for Highways and Local Programs Date Executed DOT Form 140-039 EF Revised 10102 Construction Method of Financing (Check Method Selected) State Ad and Award ❑Method A-Advance Payment-Agency Share of total construction cost(based on contract award) ❑Method B-Withhold from gas tax the Agency's share of total construction cost(line 4,column 2)in the amount of $ at$ per month for _months. Local Force or Local Ad and Award ®Method C-Agency cost Incurred with partial reimbursement The Local Agency further stipulates that pursuant to said Title 23, regulations and policies and procedures,and as a condition to payment of the federal funds obligated, it accepts and will comply with the applicable provisions set forth below Adopted by official action on Resolution/Ordinance No. Provisions I. Scope of Work 1 Preliminary engineering The Agency shall provide all the work,labor,materials,and services necessary 2 Right of w ay acquisition to perform the project which is described and set forth in detail in the"Project 3 Project construction Description"and"Type of Work" When the State acts for and on behalf of the Agency,the State shall be deemed in the event that right of way s undertakeion, is actual construction of the road,for which preliminary engineering a undertaken is not started by the closing of the tenth an agent of the Agency and shall perform the services described and indicated in fiscal year follow ing the fiscal year in which the agreement is executed,the Agency "Type of Work"on the face of this agreement,in accordance with plans and w ill repay to the State the sum or sums of federal funds paid to the Agency under the specifications as proposed by the Agency and approved by the State and the terms of this agreement(see Section IX) Federal Highway Administration When the State acts for the Agency but is not subject to the right of control by The Agency agrees that all stages of construction necessary to provide the initially perform the work subject to the planned complete facility within the limits of this project w ill conform to at least the the Agency,the State shall have the right to p ordinary procedures of the State and Federal Administration minimum values set by approved statewide design standards applicable to this class Highway of highways,even though such additional work is financed without federal aid II. Delegation of Authority participation The State is w dung to fulfill the responsibilities to the Federal Government by The Agency agrees that on federal aid highway construction projects,the current the administration of this project The Agency agrees that the State shall have the federal aid regulations which apply to liquidated damages relative to the basis of full authority to carry out this administration The State shall review,process,and federal participation in the project cost shall be applicable in the event the contractor approve documents required for federal aid reimbursement in accordance w ith fads to complete the contract within the contract time federal requirements If the State advertises and awards the contract,the State VI. Payment and Partial Reimbursement will further act for the Agency in all matters concerning the project as requested by the Agency If the Local Agency advertises and awards the project,the Slate The total cost of the project,including all review and engineering costs and shall review the work to ensure conformity w ith the approved plans and other expenses of the Stoic,is to be paid by the Agency and by the Federal specifications Gov emment Federal funding shall be in accordance with the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century(TEA 21),as amended,and Office of III. Project Administration Management and Budget circulars A-102,A-87 and A•133 The State shall not Certain types of work and services shall be provided by the State on this be ultimately responsible for any of the costs of the project The Agency shall be project as requested by the Agency and described in the Type of Work above In ultimately responsible for all costs associated with the project which are not addition,the State will furnish qualified personnel for the supervision and reimbursed by the Federal Govemment Nothing in this agreement shall be inspection of the work in progress On Local Agency advertised and awarded construed as a promise by the State as to the amount or nature of federal projects,the supervision and inspection shall be limited to ensuring all work is in participation in this project conformance with approved plans,specifications,and federal aid requirements The Agency shall bill the state for federal aid project costs incurred in conformity The salary of such engineer or other supervisor and all other salaries and costs with applicable federal and stale laws The agency shall mimmuze the time elapsed incurred by State forces upon the project will be considered a cost thereof All between receipt of federal aid funds and subsequent payment of incurred costs costs related to this project incurred by employees of the State in the customary Expenditures by the Local Agency for maintenance,general administration, manner on highway payrolls and vouchers shall be charged as costs of the supervision,and other overhead shall not be eligible for federal participation unless project an indirect cost plan has been approved by WSDOT IV. Availability of Records The State will pay for State incurred costs on the project Following All project records in support of all costs incurred and actual expenditures payment,the State shall bill the Federal Government for reimbursement of kept by the Agency are to be maintained in accordance with local government those costs eligible for federal participation to the extent that such costs are accounting procedures prescribed by the Washington State Auditor's Office, attributable and properly allocable to this project The State shall bill the the U S Department of Transportation,and the Washington State Department Agency for that portion of State costs w hich were not reimbursed by the of Transportation The records shall be open to inspection by the State and federal Government(see Section IX) Federal Government at all reasonable times and shall be retained and made I project Construction Costs available for such inspection for a period of not less than three years from the final payment of any federal aid funds to the Agency Copies of said records Project construction financing will be accomplished by one of the three shall be furnished to the State and/or Federal Government upon request methods as indicated in this agreement V. Compliance with Provisions The Agency shall not incur any federal aid participation costs on any classification of work on this project until authorized in writing by the State for each classification The classifications of work for projects are DOT Form 140-039 EF 2 Revised 10102 Method A—The Agency will place with the State,within(20)days after the X. Traffic Control,Signing, Marking,and Roadway execution of the construction contract,an ad%ance in the amount of the Maintenance Agency's share of the total construction cost based on the contract award The State will notify the Agency of the exact amount to be deposited with the Slate The Agency will not permit any changes to be made in the provisions for parking The Slate will pay all costs incurred under the contract upon presentation of regulations and traffic control on this project without prior approval of the State and progress billings from the contractor Following such payments,the Slate will Federal Highway Administration The Agency will not install or permit to be submit a billing to the Federal Government for the federal aid participation installed any signs,signals,or markings not in conformance with the standar share of the cost When the protect is substantially completed and final actual approved by the Federal Highway Administration and Is1UTCD The Agenc costs of the protect can be determined,the State will present the Agency with a at its own expense,maintain the improvement covered by this agreement final billing show ing the amount due the Stale or the amount due the Agency This billing will be cleared by either a payment from the Agency to the State or XI. Indemnity by a refund from the State to the Agency The Agency shall hold the Federal Government and the Stale harmless from and shall process and defend at its own expense all claims,demands,or suits,whether at Method B— The Agency's share of the total construction cost as shown on law or equity brought against the Agency,Slate,or Federal Government,arising the face of this agreement shall be withheld from its monthly fuel tax from the Agency's execution,performance,or failure to perform any of the allotments The face of this agreement establishes the months in which the provisions of this agreement,or of any other agreement or contract connected w ith w ithholding shall take place and the exact amount to be withheld each month this agreement,or arising by reason of the participation of the State or Federal The extent of w nhholding will be confirmed by letter from the State at the time Government in the protect,PROVIDED,nothing herein shall require the Agency to of contract award Upon receipt of progress billings from the contractor,the reimburse the State or the Federal Government for damages ansing out of bodily State will submit such billings to the Federal Government for payment of its injury to persons or damage to property caused by or resulting from the sole participating portion of such billings negligence of the Federal Government or the State Method C—The Agency may submit vouchers to the State in the(Quito/ No liability shall attach to the State or Federal Government except as expressly prescribed by the State,in duplicate,not more than once per month for those Provided herein costs eligible for Federal participation to the extent that such costs are directly XII. Nondiscrimination Provision attributable and properly allocable to this project Expenditures by the Local The Agency shall not discriminate on the basis of race,color,national origin,or Agency for maintenance,general administration,supervision,and other sex in the award and performance of any USDOT-assisted contract and/or overhead shall not be eligible for Federal participation unless claimed under a agreement or in the administration of its DBE program or the requirements of 49 pre%iously approved indirect cost plan CFR Part 26 The Agency shall take all necessary and reasonable steps under 49 The State shall reimburse the Agency for the Federal share of eligible project CFR Part 26 to ensure nondiscrimination in the award and administration of costs up to the amount shown on the face of this agreement At the time of USDOT-assisted contracts and agreements The w SDOT's DBE program,as audit,the Agency will provide documentation of all costs incurred on the required by 49 CFR Part 26 and as approved by USDOT,is incorporated by project reference in this agreement Implementation of this program is a legal obligation and failure to carry out its terms shall be treated as a%iolation of this agreement The State shall bill the Agency for all costs incurred by the State relative to Upon notification to the Agency of its failure to carry out its approved program,the the project The State shall also bill the Agency for the federal funds paid by Department may impose sanctions as provided for under Part 26 and may,in the State to the Agency for project costs which are subsequently determined to appropriate cases,refer the matter for enforcement under 18 U S C 1001 and/or the be ineligible for federal participation(see Section iX) Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act of 1986(31 U S C 3801 et seq) VII. Audit of Federal Consultant Contracts The Agency,if services of a consultant are required,shall be responsible for The Agency hereby agrees that it will incorporate or cause to be incorporat audit of the consultant's records to determine eligible federal aid costs on the any contract for construction work,or modification thereof,as defined in the r project The report of said audit shall be in the Agency's files and made and regulations of the Secretary of Labor in 41 CFR Chapter 60,which is paid for in available to the State and the Federal Go%emment whole or in part w ith funds obtained from the Federal Government or borrowed on the credit of the Federal Government pursuant to a grant,contract,loan,insurance, An audit shall be conducted by the WSDOT Internal Audit Office in or guarantee or understanding pursuant to any federal program involving such grant, accordance with generally accepted governmental auditing standards as contract,loan,insurance,or guarantee,the required contract prm isions for issued by the United Stales General Accounting Office by the Comptroller Federal-Aid Contracts(FHWA 1273),located in Chapter 44 of the Local Agency General of the United States,WSDOT Manual M 27-50,Consultant Guidelines Authorization,Selection,and Agreement Administration,memoranda of The Agency further agrees that it will be bound by the above equal opportunity understanding between WSDOT and FHH A,and Office of Management and Budget Circular A-133 clause with respect to its own employment practices when it participates in federally assisted construction work Provided,that if the applicant so If upon audit it is found that overpayment or participation of federal participating is a State or Local Government,the abo%e equal opportunity clause money in ineligible items of cost has occurred,the Agency shall reimburse is not applicable to any agency,instrumentality,or subdivision of such the State for the amount of such overpayment or excess participation(see government which does not participate in work on or under the contract Section IX) VIII. Single Audit Act The Agency also agrees The Agency,as a subreciprent of federal funds,shall adhere to the federal (1) To assist and cooperate actively with the State in obtaining the compliance of Office of Management and Budget(OMB)Circular A-133 as well as all contractors and subcontractors with the equal opportunity clause and rules, applicable federal and state statutes and regulations A subreciprent who regulations,and relevant orders of the Secretary of Labor expends$300,000 or more in federal awards from all sources during a given fiscal year shall have a single or program-specific audit performed for that (2) To pumice the State such information as it may require for the of such compliance and that it will otherwise assist the State in the dischaargerge off s year in accordance with the provisions of OMB Circular A-133 Upon its t its primary responsibility for securing compliance conclusion of the A-133 audit,the Agency shall be responsible for ensuring that a copy of the report is transmitted promptly to the State (3) To refrain from entering into any contract or contract modification subject to Executive Order 11246 of September 24,1965,with a contractor debarred from,or IX. Payment of Billing who has not demonstrated eligibility for,government contracts and federally The Agency agrees that if payment or arrangement for payment of any of assisted construction contracts pursuant to the Execuuie Order the State's billing relative to the project(e g,State force work,project cancellation,overpayment,cost ineligible for federal participation,etc)is not (4) To carry out such sanctions and penalties for violation of the equal made to the State within 45 days after the Agency has been billed,the State opportunity clause as may be imposed upon contractors and subcontractors by the shall effect reimbursement of the total sum due from the regular monthly fuel State,Federal Highway Administration,or the Secretary of Labor pursuant to t0ax allotments to the Agency from the Motor Vehicle Fund No additional 11,subpart D of the Executive Order Federal project funding will be approved until full payment is received unless otherwise directed the Assistant Secretary for Highways and Local Programs DOT Form 140-039 EF 3 Revised 10102 In addition,the Agency agrees that if it fails or refuses to comply with these XV. Venue for Claims and/or Causes of Action undertakings,the State may take any or all of the following actions For the convenience of the parties to this contract,it is agreed that any claims (a) Cancel,terminate,or suspend this agreement in whole or in part, and/or causes of action which the Local Agency has against the State of Washington,grow ing out of this contract or the projectwith which it is (b) Refrain from extending any further assistance to the Agency under the concerned,shall be brought only in the Superior Court for Thurston County program with respect to w hich the failure or refusal occurred until satisfactory assurance of future compliance has been received from the Agency,and XVI. Certification Regarding the Restrictions of the Use (c) Refer the case to the Department of Justice for appropriate legal proceedings of Federal Funds for Lobbying The approving authority certifies,to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that XIII. Liquidated Damages (1) No federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid,by or on behalf The Agency hereby agrees that the liquidated damages prov isions of 23 CFR of the undersigned,to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an Part 635,Subpart 127,as supplemented,relative to the amount of Federal officer or employee of any federal agency,a member of Congress,an officer or participation in the project cost,shall be applicable in the event the contractor employee of Congress,or an employee of a member of Congress in connection with fails to complete the contract within the contract time Failure to include the awarding of any federal contract,the making of any federal grant,the making of liquidated damages provision will not reheve the Agency from reduction of any federal loan,the entering into of any cooperative agreement,and the extension, federal participation in accordance with this paragraph continuation,renewal,amendment,or modification of any federal contract,grant, XIV. Termination for Public Convenience loan,or cooperative agreement The Secretary of the Washington State Department of Transportation may (2) If any funds other than federal appropriated funds ha%a been paid or w ill be terminate the contract in w hole,or from time to time in part,whenever paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any federal agency,a member of Congress,an officer or employee of Congress, (I) The requisite federal funding becomes unav ailable through failure of or an employee of a member of Congress in connection with this federal contract, appropriation or otherwise grant,loan,or cooperative agreement,the undersigned shall complete and submit (2) The contractor is prevented from proceeding with the work as a direct the Standard Form-LLL,"Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying,"in accordance result of an Executive Order of the President with respect to the prosecution of with its instructions w ar or in the interest of national defense,or an Executive Order of the (3) The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be President or Governor of the State with respect to the preservation of energy included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers(including subgrants, resources and contracts and subcontracts under grants,subgrants,loans,and cooperative (3) The contractor is prevented from proceeding with the work by reason of agreements)which exceed$100,000,and that all such subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly a preliminary,special,or permanent restraining order of a court of competent jurisdiction where the issuance of such order is primarily caused by the acts or This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was omissions of persons or agencies other than the contractor placed when this transaction was made or entered into Submission of this certification as a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by Section 1352,Title 31,U S Code Any person who fails to file the required (4) The Secretary determines that such termination is in the best interests of certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than S10,000 and not more the Slate than$100,000 for each such failure • Additional Provisions DOT Form 140-039 EF 4 Revised 10102 Kent City Council Meeting Date September 16, 2003 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: WASHINGTON TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION GRANT— ACCEPT 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Kent Police Department requests authorization to accept a Washington Traffic Safety Commission (WTSC) grant in the amount of $3,500.00. The Washington Traffic Safety Commission (WTSC) will award a grant in the amount of$3,500.00 to fund officer overtime for the seat belt enforcement program entitled, "Click It or Ticket." This is an enforcement activity with "zero tolerance" for seat belt violators. The WTSC enforcement program period will run from September 15-30 and will include media and public education activities. The Kent Police Department will participate in this campaign from September 17-30. The grant application deadline was September 5, 2003. • 3. EXHIBITS: Notification letter from WTSC dated 08/05/03; copy of application letter from Kent Police Department to WTSC dated 8/27/03; and memorandum of Understanding between WTSC and Kent Police Department dated 8/27/03. 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Safety Committee 9/9/03 (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds • DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 6E 3 POLICE DEPARTMENT Ed Crawford,Chief of Police Phone•253-856-5888 Fax 253-856a02 KENT W A S M I M G T C N Address: 220 Fourth Avenue S. Kent,WA 98032-5895 DATE: September 09,2003 TO: Public Safety Committee SUBJECT: Kent Police Department requests authorization to accept a Washington Traffic Safety Commission(WTSC)grant in the amount of$3,500.00. MOTION: I move to recommend accepting the Washington Traffic Safety Commission(WTSC)grant in the amount of$3,500.00 and that this item be placed on the Consent Calendar for the September 16, 2003 Council Meeting. SUMMARY: The Washington Traffic Safety Commission(WTSC)will award a grant in the amount of $3,500.00 to fund officer overtime for the seat belt enforcement program entitled,"Click It or Ticket". This is an enforcement activity with"zero tolerance" for seat belt violators. The WTSC enforcement program period will run from September 15-30 and will include media and public education activities. The Kent Police Department will participate in this campaign from September 17-30. The grant application deadline was September 5,2003. EXHIBITS: Notification letter from WTSC dated 08/05/03. Copy of application letter from Kent Police Department to WTSC dated 8/27/03. Memorandum of Understanding between WTSC and Kent Police Department dated 08/27/03 BUDGET IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND: The goal of the federal grant is to save lives and prevent serious injuries on Washington's roadways by increasing the seat belt usage rate. Public Safety Committee Subject:WTSC grant Date:September 9,2003 5 ACE n�T�o^ so' a jyr lees� STATE OF WASHINGTON WASHINGTON TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION 1000 S. Cherry St., PO Box 40944 • Olympia, Washington 98504.0944 a (360) 753-6197 August 5,2003 TO: Washington State Law Enforcement Agencies 3-FLAGS Participants FROM: Angie Ward,Program Manager (360) 753-0877,award(a)wtsc.wa.eov RE: Overtime Funding for "Click It Or Ticket"Enforcement Campaign The Washington Traffic Safety Commission(WTSC)will be coordinating a September Click-it or Ticket seat belt mobilization . This high-visibility seat belt enforcement campaign model has been shown to increase seat belt and child restraint use rates thereby decreasing death and serious injury on roadways across the nation. This campaign and law enforcement's active enforcement played a Iarge part in saving 31 lives in Washington from June through December of last year. As most of you know by now,the concept is simple. It starts with a statewide public information effort to educate motorists about the upcoming seat belt enforcement wave and is followed up with an intensive period of increased enforcement through zero tolerance seat belt emphasis patrols.The WTSC will be spending a substantial amount of money on paid media spots, including television and radio public service announcements containing a clear message about the coming enforcement. These spots will air in both the week before and the weeks during the mobilization. As an integral part of this mobilization, the WTSC is pleased to announce the availability of grant funds for"Zero Tolerance—Seat Belt Emphasis Patrols." The enforcement activity will be begin on September 15, and run through September 30,2003. The goal of this federal grant is to save lives and prevent serious injuries on Washington's roadways by increasing the seat belt usage rate. Over half of all the vehicle occupants who die as a result of crashes in Washington are unbuckled. Funding for this mobilization will be awarded based on three criteria: • Low seat belt use rate areas(based on attached WTSC survey) • High crash areas (based on attached WTSC Traffic Risk Indicator chart) • Multi jurisdictional approaches It is our intent to award funding to every agency that applies. Should requests for i funding exceed our ability to fund them, the above criteria will be used to prioritize the requests. A multi jurisdictional approach could be something as simple as coordinating 6 the dates for overtime with a neighboring city or county or working with the WSP. In addition,performance on previous VI TSC overtime grants will also be taken into account. ]) Eligibility— All state,county,local and tribal law enforcement agencies are eligible and encouraged to participate in this project. The use of commissioned reserve officers is approved as long as a pay structure exists. Funding availability is on a first-come basis based on agency size and the number of full-time commissioned personnel as follows: N of Commissioned Officers May request fundine up to: 1-10 $1,000 . 11-25 $1,500 26-50 $2,000 51-100 $2,500 101 + $3,500 2) Funding Guidelines- Funding will be on a"reimbursement"basis and requires the submission of a State invoice voucher(Form A-19—attached) upon completion of activity. Support documents for reimbursement must include signed overtime slips or payroll/expense records showing payments made, officer activity logs demonstrating performance,and a combined activity log totaling all officer activity logs for the mobilization. • Performance standards for funded personnel are a minimum of three(3)self- initiated contacts per hour funded with a "desired outcome"of three(3) seat belt citations per hour. This is an enforcement activity with"zero tolerance"for seat belt violations. It is expected that Notices of Infraction(NOI's) will be issued at contact unless circumstances dictate otherwise. It is understood that violator contacts may result in related time-consuming activity. Such activity will be considered for reimbursement. Activity other than that initiated through emphasis patrol contact(investigating collisions,emergency responses, etc)will be the responsibility of the contracting agency and may not be considered for reimbursement. • Allowable use offunds will be for overtime salary(Q 1.5 times normal rate),and wages and benefits of commissioned personnel in direct support of operational activity.No equipment purchases are authorized. 3) Application jar Funds— Application for funding must be received by WTSC by September 5,2003 and must include the following elements: a.A grant letter requesting overtime funding. The letter must contain the following elements(See attached sample letter): 7 • A schedule of planned enforcement dates during the September 15-30 Mobilization(dates may be changed later due to operational requirements)and the number of personnel committed to each date • The amount of funds requested • The designation of a single`point of contact"for the purposes of the project management,administration and activity repotting • The designation of a single"point of contact"for media and public education purposes(May be the same as the project manager) • Information addressing the three qualifying criteria listed above(optional,but this information might increase your chances for funding if we nerd to prioritize grantees) b. A signed Memorandum of Understanding(MOU-attached) 4) Funding Approval— A copy of the approved MOU will be returned to your agency prior to planned activity. S) ReimbursemenVReporting- To receive reimbursement,the following must be submitted to WTSC no later than October 31,2003 • A Completed Invoice Voucher,A 19-1A Form(attached).Please note that we cannot accept a FAX.We must have Your agency identified as the"Claimant",a Federal Tax ID#and an original signature of the seencv Lead,command officer or contracting officer on the A-19 form. • Payroll support documents such as signed overtime slips or payroll/expense records showing rate of pay or payments made. • Activity logs for each officer and a combined activity log with totals for the entire mobilization. Important Note.If it is not possible to bill the WTSC by October 31,2003 you must at least send the statistics by that dale. You do not need to contact our office ifyour billing will be late. 6) Contact Information/Ouesdons- Please contact me at (360)753-0877 or email awardCa.wtsc.wa.gov if you have any questions. Attachments: Memorandum of Understanding Activity Log Combined Activity Log Sample grant request letter A-19 Invoice Voucher(for use at time of billing) Belt Use By County Traffic Risk Indicators 8 KEN T August 27, 2003 WASHINOTON Angie Ward Occupant Protection Program Manager POLICE Washington Traffic Safety Commission Ed Crawford P.O. Box 40944 Chief of Police Olympia, WA 98504-0944 Phone:253-856-5800 Fax 253-856-6802 Dear Angie, 220 Fourth Ave.S. The Kent Police Department requests overtime officer funding for the Kent,WA 98032-5895 September 15-30, 2003 "Click It or Ticket"seat belt enforcement campaign. We are requesting $3,500 to cover an estimated 74 overtime hours.The enforcement schedule is as follows: Sept. 17 3 officers,3 hours each 9 hours Sept. 18 2 officers,3 hours each 1 officer,4 hours 10 hours Sept. 19 2 officers,3 hours each 6 hours Sept.20-21 1 officer, 3 hours x 2 days 6 hours Sept.22 2 officers,3 hours each 6 hours Sept.23 2 officers,3 hours each 6 hours Sept.24 2 officers,3 hours each 1 officer,2 hours 6 hours Sept.25 1 officer, 2 hours 2 hours Sept.26-27 1 officer, 3 hours x 2 days 6 hours Sept.28 1 officer,4 hours 4 hours Sept.29 2 officers,3 hours each 6 hours Sept.30 1 officer®2 hours 1 officer @ 3 hours 5 hours Total=74 hours The June 2002 WTSC statewide survey reported seat belt usage on King County roads as low as 86.1% and 87.65% on state routes. The jurisdiction covered by the Kent Police Department encompasses several state routes and county roads. The point of contact for Kent Police Department is Sergeant Pat Lowery for enforcement coordination and grant administration. He will ensure that the reimbursement documents are submitted by October 31,2003. Sergeant Lowery can be reached at:220 4'"Avenue South, Kent, WA 98032, Phone 253-856-5871, Fax 253-85"802 or email address of plowery@ci.kent.wa.us. Public Information Plan: Public Information Officer Paul Petersen will coordinate media and public education activities. Officer Petersen can be reached at: 220 4"'Avenue South, Kent,WA 98032, Phone 253-856-5877, Fax 253-856-6802 or email address of ppetersen@ci.kent.wa.us. 9 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WASHINGTON TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION 1000 So.Cherry St,PO Box 40944,Olympia,WA 98504-0944 THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between: Kent Police Department (insert your agency name above) Hereinafter referred to as `Contractor and the WASHINGTON TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION, hereinafter referred to as"WTSC" IT IS THE PURPOSE OF THIS AGREEMENT to provide overtime funding to law enforcement agencies to conduct 'Zero Tolerance—Safety Doff Emphas/s Patrols"during the period of September 15-30, 2003. The goal of this project is to contact as many violators as possible with a'Zero Tolerance'for seat bait violations IT IS,THEREFORE,MUTUALLY AGREED THAT: 1. Contractor will provide a commissioned police officer(active or paid reserve)with appropriate equipment (vehicle,radar,etc)on an'overtrme basis (not to exceed 1.5 times normal salary)to enforce seat belt laws. No on-duty personnel will be funded. 2. The period of activity will begin on September 15 and extend through September 30,2003. Funding is riot available for activity before or after this period and funding may not exceed the amount prescribed in the attached Request for Proposal. 3. Performance standards for funded personnel are a minimum of three Q)self-Initiated contacts per hour funded with a "desired outcome"of three(3)seat belt citations per hour. This Is an enforcement activity with"zero tolerane for seat belt violations.It is expected Notices of Infraction(NOI's)will be issued at contact unless circumstances dictate otherwise. it is understood that violator contacts may result In related,time-consuming activity. Such activity will be considered for reimbursement.Activity other than that initiated through emphasis patrol contact(investigating collisions,emergency responses,etc)will be the responsibility of the contracting agency and may not be considered for reimbursement 4. Contractor must submit for reimbursement no later than October 31,2003. Billings will include: ♦ Invoice Voucher, A19-1A Form (attached). Please note that we cannot accept a FAX. We must have MW agency identified as the 'Claimant, a Federal Tax ID # and an original signature of the soencv head,command officer or contracting officer on the A-19 form: ♦ Payroll support documents(overtime slips,payroll documents,etc); ♦ Officer worksheets(showing 3 or more self-initiated contacts per hour);and ♦ Combined activity log with totals for the entire mobilization. 5. Disputes arising under this agreement shall be resolved by a panel consisting of one representative of the Washington Traffic Safety Commission, one representative from your agency and a mutually agreed upon third party. The dispute panel shall thereafter decide the dispute with the majority prevailing. 8. Either party may terminate this agreement upon (30)days written notice to the other party. In the event of termination of this agreement, the terminating party shall be liable for the performance rendered prior to the effective date of termination. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,PARTIES HAVE EXECUTED THIS AGREEMENT. APPROVEDIDISAPPROVED Kent Police Department Agency Washington Traffic Safety Commission Ed Crawford, Chief of Police Return to: WTSC Contr " g Agent(Pr1n:1 Name) PO Box 40944 Olympia,WA 98504-09M Sig 10 The signed Memorandum of Understanding is attached. We look forward to receiving the WTSC confirmation letter and a copy of the executed MOU by September 12, 2003. Sincerely, Qctct�l Ed Crawford Chief of Police [Cent Police Dcparunent Application 2 W'I'SC Funding for Click It or Ticket M7r103 • REPORTS FROM STANDING COMMITTEES AND STAFF A. COUNCIL PRESIDENT B. OPERATIONS COMMITTEE C. PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE D. PUBLIC WORKS i E. PLANNING COMMITTEE F. PARKS COMMITTEE �r G. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS Mad ad n E 5 3� *N" [s - REPORTS FROM SPECIAL COMMITTEES • CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS A. • • • EXECUTIVE SESSION A) Pending Litigation B) Property Acquisition • • ACTION AFTER EXECUTIVE SESSION A) • •