HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Meeting - Council - Agenda - 09/02/2003 -7m
� i :IILID � ,
City of Kent
City Council Meeting
Agenda
September 2, 2002
Mayor Jim White
Councilmembers
Judy Woods, Council President
Tim Clark Julie Peterson
Connie Epperly Bruce White
Leona Orr Rico Yingling
\""47
KENT
WASHING?ON
City Clerk's Office
SUMMARY AGENDA
KENT CITY COUNCIL MEETING
KENT September 2, 2003
W A S H I N G T O N Council Chambers
7:00 p.m.
MAYOR: Jim White COUNCILMEMBERS: Judy Woods, President
Tim Clark Connie Epperly Leona Orr
Julie Peterson Bruce White Rico Yingling
1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE
2. ROLL CALL
3. CHANGES TO AGENDA
A. FROM COUNCIL, ADMINISTRATION, OR STAFF
B. FROM THE PUBLIC
4. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
A. Employee of the Month
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS
None
6. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Minutes of Previous Meeting—Approve
B. Payment of Bills—Approve
C. LID 356, 111th Avenue SE Sanitary Sewers Ordinance—Adopt
D. Rodenhauser Latecomer Agreement—Authorize
E. Sensitive Area Quitclaim Deed from the Boeing Company—Authorize
F. State Grant for Commute Trip Reduction Program—Authorize
G. Six-Year Transportation Improvement Plan—Set Hearing Date
H. South 277th Street Improvement Project—Accept as Complete
I. 2003 Asphalt Overlays Project—Accept as Complete
J. 2004 Budget, Capital Facilities Plan Amendment, and School District Capital
Facilities Plan Updates—Set Hearing Date
K. Excused Absence for Councilmember Peterson—Approve
L. Amendment to Delinquent Accounts Ordinance—Adopt
M. City Credit Card Use Clarification Resolution—Adopt
N. First Half 2003 Budget Amendment Ordinance—Adopt
7. OTHER BUSINESS
A. Qwest Conditional Use Appeal—Closed Record Hearing(#CE-2001-3)
8. BIDS
A. Pacific Highway South HOV Lanes—South Phase—S. 272nd Street to S. 252nd
Street—Joint Utility Trench
B. Water Treatment Chemical Supply for 2003-2004— Sodium Fluoride
(continued next page)
SUMMARY AGENDA CONTINUED
i9. REPORTS FROM STANDING COMMITTEES AND STAFF
10. REPORTS FROM SPECIAL COMMITTEES
11. CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS A
12. EXECUTIVE SESSION
A. Pending Litigation
B. Land Acquisition
13. ACTION AFTER EXECUTIVE SESSION
14. ADJOURNMENT
NOTE: A copy of the full agenda packet is available for perusal in the City Clerk's Office and the
Kent Library. The Agenda Summary page is on the City of Kent web site at
www.ci.kent.wa.us.
An explanation of the agenda format is given on the back of this page.
Any person requiring a disability accommodation should contact the City Clerk's Office in advance at
(253) 856-5725. For TDD relay service call the Washington Telecommunications Relay Service at
1-800-833-6388.
CHANGES TO THE AGENDA
Citizens wishing to address the Council will, at this time, make known the subject of
interest, so all may be properly heard.
A) FROM COUNCIL, ADMINISTRATION, OR STAFF
B) FROM THE PUBLIC
•
PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
A) EMPLOYEE OF THE MONTH
•
CONSENT CALENDAR
6. City Council Action:
Councilmember �J moves, Councilmember ( vLJ
seconds to approve Consent Calendar Items A through N.
Discussion
Action C
6A. Auuroval of Minutes.
Approval of the minutes of the regular Council meeting of August 19, 2003.
6B. Approval of Bills.
Approval of payment of the bills received through August 15 and paid on August 15
after auditing by the Operations Committee on August 19, 2003.
Approval of checks issued for vouchers:
Date Check Numbers Amount
8/15/03 Wire Transfers 1480-1491 $10,1329988.73
8/15/03 Prepays & 551891 1,8899797.23
8/15/03 Regular 552550 1,148,498.47
$131171,284.43
Approval of interim checks:
Date Check Numbers Amount
8/8/03 Interim Checks 272059 $ 58.64
8/12/03 Interim Checks 272060-272062 128.50
8/13/03 Interim Checks 272063-272067 1,027.65
$1,214.79
Council Agenda
Item No. 6 A-B
•
• 40*
KENT Kent City Council Meeting
W A S N I N O T O N August 19, 2003
The regular meeting of the Kent City Council was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor White.
Councilmembers present: Clark, Epperly, Orr, White, Woods and Yingling. Councilmember
Peterson was excused from the meeting. Approximately 50 people were in attendance. (CFN-198)
CHANGES TO AGENDA
A. From Council, Administration or Staff. (CFN-198) CAO Martin noted that there will be
only one item to discuss under Executive Session.
PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
A. Performing Arts Center Scholarship Awards. (CFN-155) Linda Peterson and Diana
Albertson presented scholarships totaling $7,000 to the winners of the Performing Arts Center
Scholarship Awards.
B. Economic Update. (CFN-198) Nathan Torgelson reported that the Economic Development
Strategic Plan is available to the public, and gave a overview of the plan.
PUBLIC HEARING
A. LID 356, 111" Avenue SE Sanitary Sewers. (CFN-1280) Public Works Director
Wickstrom explained the project and costs. Mayor White opened the public hearing. Britt
Widmer, 1933 SE 19ei Court, owner of Lot No. 3, objected to the LID since they have only a
garage on their lot and questioned the method of assessment. Jack Paris, owner of Lots 5, 6 and 7,
stated that he has been having sewer problems for many years. There were no further comments
and WOODS MOVED to close the public hearing. Orr seconded and the motion carried.
CLARK MOVED to approve the formation of LID 356 for the construction of I I I1h Avenue
Sanitary Sewers project, including related improvements, and to direct the City Attorney to draft
the necessary ordinance for the September 2" City Council meeting. Woods seconded and the
motion carried.
CONSENT CALENDAR
WOODS MOVED to approve Consent Calendar Items A though O. Clark seconded and the
motion carried.
A. Approval of Minutes. (CFN-198) The minutes of the regular meeting of August 5, 2003,
were approved.
B. Approval of Bills. (CFN-104) Payment of the bills received through July 31 and paid on
July 31 after auditing by the Operations Committee on August 5, 2003.
Approval of checks issued for vouchers:
Date Check Numbers Amount
7/31/03 Wire Transfers 1472-1479 $1,031,279.15
7/31/03 Prepays & 551152 818,394.73
7/31/03 Regular 551890 2,698,254.85
$4,547,928.73
1
Kent City Council Minutes August 19,2003
Approval of checks issued for payroll for July 1 through July 15 and paid on July 18,2003:
Date Check Numbers Amount
7/18/03 Checks 271439-271751 $ 268,334.75
7/18/03 Advices 150710-151370 1,184,038.44
$1,452,373.19
AAnvroval of checks issued for payroll for July 16 through July 31 and paid on August 5, 2003:
Date Check Numbers Amount
7/21/03 Interim Checks 271752 339.08
8/5/03 Checks 271753-272058 $ 293,860.81
8/5/03 Advices 151371-152027 1,172,112.95
$1,465,973.76
C. Proiect Construction Agreement with Puget Sound Enerev, Pacific Highway S. HOV
Lanes Proiect. (CFN-1038) As recommended by the Public Works Committee, the Mayor was
authorized to sign the Project Construction Agreement with Puget Sound Energy for conversion of
the overhead power to underground for the South Phase of Pacific Highway South HOV Lane
Project, subject to the City Attorney's and the Public Works Director's concurrence of the
language therein. i
D. Joint Utility Trench Agreement with Comcast, Pacific Highway S. HOV Lanes Proiect.
(CFN-1038) As recommended by the Public Works Committee, the Mayor was authorized to sign
a Joint Utility Trench Agreement with Comcast as part of the South Phase of Pacific Highway
South HOV Lane Project, subject to the City Attorney's and the Public Works Director's
concurrence of the language therein.
E. Bret Gagliardi Sewer Latecomers Agreement. (CFN-485) The Public Works Director was
authorized to execute a sewer latecomer agreement with Bret Gagliardi.
F. Disposal of Surplus Vehicles and Equipment. (CFN-239) As recommended by the Public
Works Committee, vehicles and equipment no longer needed by the City were declared as surplus,
and their sale at the next public auction was authorized.
G. Public Works Trust Fund Pre-Construction Loan, (CFN-171) As recommended by the
Public Works Committee, the Mayor was authorized to sign Public Works Trust Fund Loan
Agreement,Number PW-03-691-PRE-108, in the amount of$1,000,000 for the 228`h Street
Extension, subject to the City Attorney's and the Public Works Director's concurrence of the
language therein.
H. Rainwater Harvesting System Ordinance. (CFN-565) Ordinance No. 3656 amending the
Kent City Code to include a 10%discount on storm and surface water utility charges for
commercial properties utilizing a rainwater harvesting system, was adopted.
2
Kent City Council Minutes August 19, 2003
I. LID 357, 120th Place SE Sanitary Sewers. (CFN-1284) Resolution No. 1651 setting
September 16, 2003, as the hearing date on proposed Local Improvement District 357("LID") for
the public to comment on or object to the LID before the city council, was adopted.
J. Agreement Regarding Development And Operation of Grandview Park Off-Leash Area.
(CFN-118) As recommended by the Operations Committee, the Mayor was authorized to sign the
joint agreement to develop Grandview Off Leash Dog Park and amend the Off Leash Park Budget.
K. Agreement for Public Defense Services. (CFN-234) The Mayor was authorized to execute a
new Agreement with Stewart Beall &MacNichols for public defense services in the amount of
$234,000.00 per year, effective September 1, 2003.
L. Valley Medical Center Occupational Health Service Addendum and Extension to
Contract for Services. (CFN-122sf) As recommended by the Public Safety Committee, the
Mayor was authorized to sign the Addendum Four and Extension to Contract for Services with
Valley Medical Center Occupational Health Services (OHS).
M. Application for Local Law Enforcement Block Grant Program for 2003. (CFN-122sf) As
recommended by the Public Safety Committee, the Kent Police Department was authorized to
apply for the FY 2003 Local Law Enforcement Block Grant (LLEBG).
N. Kent Station Preliminary Plat Appeal Findings and Conclusions Resolution. (CFN-1277)
Resolution No. 1652, approving the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of the Kent City Council,
sitting as a quasi-judicial body,which sustained the Hearing Examiner's Findings, Conclusions
and Decision issued on January 30, 2003, regarding the Kent Station Preliminary Plat Appeal
brought by Don Shaffer in his individual capacity, Don Shaffer as a representative of Kent
C.A.R.E.S., and Don Shaffer as president of Northwest Alliance, Inc.,was adopted.
0. Excused Absence. (CFN-198) A request for excused absences from the August 19, 2003 and
September 2,2003 City Council meetings for Councilmember Peterson, was approved.
BIDS
A. 3rd Avenue South and Washington Avenue Pump Stations. (CFN-1038) The bid opening
was held on August 4, 2003,with one bid received,which was submitted by Archer Construction,
Inc. in the amount of$348,896.00. The Engineer's estimate was $315,740.00. The Public Works
Director recommends awarding this contract to Archer Construction, Inc. CLARK SO MOVED.
Yingling seconded and the motion carved.
REPORTS
D. Public Works. (CFN-198) Clark noted that because of the holiday on Labor Day, the
committee will not meet until the third Monday in September.
F. Parks Committee. (CFN-198) Woods noted that the next meeting will be at 4:00 p.m. on
September 9 .
G. Administrative Reports. (CFN-198) Martin reminded Council members of an Executive
Session of approximately ten minutes to discuss one item, with action anticipated afterward.
3
Kent City Council Minutes August 19, 2003
EXECUTIVE SESSION
(CFN-198) The meeting recessed to Executive Session at 7:36 p.m. and reconvened at 7:57 p.m.
ACTION AFTER EXECUTIVE SESSION
A. Property Acquisition. (CFN-239) CLARK MOVED to authorize the purchase of a portion
of the Rosso Nursery property subject to the terms and conditions of the Public Works
Department's "Contingent Offer to Purchase"letter, as submitted to the RRR Enterpnses
bankruptcy debtor's attorney on August 1, 2003. Woods seconded and the motion carried.
ADJOURNMENT
(CFN-198) At 7.57 p.m., WOODS MOVED to adjourn. Orr seconded and the motion carried.
`6000 s
Brenda Jacober, CMC
City Clerk
4
Kent City Council Meeting
Date September 2. 2003
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: LID 3569 111TH AVENUE SE SANITARY SEWERS
ORDINANCE—ADOPT
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Adoption of Ordinance No. , that orders the
construction of the sanitary sewer system in the vicinity of 1111'Avenue SE in
accordance with Resolution No. 1649, establishes Local Improvement District
("LID' 356 and orders the carrying out of the proposed improvement,provides for
payment of the improvement in part by special assessment, and provides for the
issuance and sale of LID warrants.
Resolution No. 1649, adopted on July 15, 2003, declared the City Council's intention to
order the installation of sanitary sewers in the vicinity of 11 Ith Avenue SE. At its
August 19, 2003, meeting, Council held a public hearing regarding the proposed
improvement. At the conclusion of the hearing, Council determined the improvements
are in the best interests of the City and requested that the City Attorney prepare an
ordinance establishing the necessary LID. This ordinance forms LID 356 in order to
carry out the improvements of the project.
3. EXHIBITS: Ordinance
4. RECOMMENDED BY: Council
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
6. EXPENDITURE REOUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 6C
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of
Kent, Washington,ordering the construction of an 8"sanitary
sewer system with 6" side sewer stubs to the right-of-way
line, all in accordance with Resolution No. 1649 of the City
Council; establishing Local Improvement District No. 356
and ordering the carrying out of the proposed improvement;
providing that payment for the improvement be made in part
by special assessments upon the property in the District,
payable by the mode of"payment by bonds"; and providing
for the issuance and sale of local improvement district
warrants redeemable in cash or other short-term financing
and local improvement district bonds.
�I
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 1649 adopted July 15, 2003, the City
Council declared its intention to order the construction of an 8" sanitary sewer system
�I with 6" side sewer stubs to the right-of-way line, and fixed August 19, 2003, at 7.00
p.m., local time, in the council chambers of City Hall as the time and place for hearing
all matters relating to the proposed improvement and all comments thereon and
objections thereto and for determining the method of payment for the improvement,
and
WHEREAS, the City's Public Works Director caused an estimate to be
made of the cost and expense of the proposed improvement and certified that estimate
to the City Council, together with all papers and information in his possession touching
the proposed improvement, a description of the boundaries of the proposed local
improvement district and a statement of what portion of the cost and expense of the
improvement should be bome by the property within the proposed district; and
LID 356 Formation Ordinance
WHEREAS, that estimate is accompanied by a diagram of the proposed
improvement showing thereon the lots,tracts, parcels of land, and other property which
will be specially benefited by the proposed improvement and the estimated cost and
expense thereof to be borne by each lot, tract and parcel of land or other property; and
WHEREAS, due notice of the above hearing was given in the manner
provided by law, the hearing was held by the City Council on the date and at the time
above mentioned, all objections to the proposed improvement were duly considered
and overruled, and all persons appearing at such hearing and wishing to be heard were
heard; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined it to be in the best
interests of the City that the improvement as hereinafter described be carried out and
that a local improvement district be created in connection therewith; NOW,
THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON,
DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, orders
the improvement of the properties within the area described in Exhibit "A," attached
hereto and by this reference made a part hereof, by the construction of an 8" sanitary
sewer system with 6" side sewer stubs to the right-of-way line.
All of the foregoing shall be in accordance with the plans and
specifications therefor prepared by the City's Public Works Director, and may be
modified by the City Council as long as such modification does not affect the purpose
of the improvement.
SECTION 2. There is created and established a local improvement
district to be called Local Improvement District No. 356 of the City of Kent,
Washington (the "District"), the boundaries or territorial extent of the District being
more particularly described in Exhibit "B," attached hereto and by this reference
incorporated herein.
-2- LID 356 Formation Ordinance
50396206 01
SECTION 3. The total estimated cost and expense of the improvement
is declared to be $256,500. Approximately $165,000 of the cost and expense shall be
borne by and assessed against the property specially benefited by such improvement
included in the District, which embraces as nearly as practicable all property specially
benefited by such improvement and the balance of such cost and expense shall be paid
by the City.
SECTION 4. In accordance with the provisions of RCW 35.44.047, the
City may use any method or combination of methods to compute assessments that may
be deemed to more fairly reflect the special benefits to the properties being assessed
than the statutory method of assessing the properties.
SECTION 5. No property, any portion of which is outside the District,
may connect to those improvements constructed or made a part of such District unless
either that property shall have been subject to the special assessments on the
assessment roll for that District or the owners of that property shall have paid prior to
such connection a charge in lieu of assessment, which shall be at least the equivalent of
those assessments that would have been applied to that property had it been included
within that District
SECTION 6. Local improvement district warrants may be issued in
payment of the cost and expense of the improvement herein ordered to be assessed,
such warrants to be paid out of the Local Improvement Fund, District No 356,
hereinafter created and referred to as the Local Improvement Fund, and, until the bonds
referred to in this section are issued and delivered to the purchaser thereof, to bear
interest from the date thereof at a rate to be established hereafter by the City's Finance
Department Director, as issuing officer, and to be redeemed in cash and/or by local
improvement district bonds herein authorized to be issued, such interest-bearing
warrants to be hereafter referred to as "revenue warrants." In the alternative, the City
hereafter may provide by ordinance for the issuance of other short-tern obligations
pursuant to chapter 39.50 RCW.
If the City shall authorize expenditures to be made for such
improvement (other than for any cost or expense expected to be borne by the City)
-3- LID 356 Formation Ordinance
50396206 01
prior to the date that any short-term obligations or local improvement district bonds are
issued to finance the improvement, from proceeds of interfund loans or other funds that
are not, and are not reasonably expected to be, reserved, allocated on a long-term basis
or otherwise set aside to pay the cost of the improvement herein ordered to be assessed
against the property specially benefited thereby, the City declares its official intent that
those expenditures, to the extent not reimbursed with prepaid special benefit
assessments, are to be reimbursed from proceeds of short-term obligations or local
improvement district bonds that are expected to be issued for the improvement in a
principal amount not exceeding$165,000.
The City is authorized to issue local improvement district bonds for the
District that shall bear interest at a rate and be payable on or before a date to be
hereafter fixed by ordinance. The bonds shall be issued in exchange for and/or in
redemption of any and all revenue warrants issued hereunder or other short-term
obligations hereafter authorized and not redeemed in cash within twenty(20) days after
the expiration of the thirty-day penod for the cash payment without interest of
assessments on the assessment roll for the District. The bonds shall be paid and
redeemed by the collection of special assessments to be levied and assessed against the
property within the District, payable in annual installments, with interest at a rate to be
hereafter fixed by ordinance under the mode of"payment by bonds," as defined by law
and the ordinances of the City. The exact form, amount, date, interest rate, and
denominations of such bonds hereafter shall be fixed by ordinance of the City Council.
Such bonds shall be sold in such manner as the City Council hereafter shall determine.
SECTION 7. For the purpose of paying all or a part of the costs of
carrying out the improvements within the District pending the receipt of the proceeds
of the issuance and sale of the bonds or short-term obligations referred to in Section 5,
interfund loans from the General Fund and/or Street Fund to the Local Improvement
Fund in the maximum aggregate amount of $165,000 are authonzed and approved,
those loans to be repaid on or before the issuance of such bonds or obligations from the
proceeds thereof. Each of the interfund loans shall bear interest at a variable rate,
adjusted the 15`h and last day of each month, equal to the interest rate of the State of
Washington Local Govemment Investment Pool on the 15`h and last day of each
-4- LID 356 Formation Ordinance
50396206 01
month. The initial interest rate on the date of each interfund loan shall be determined
as of the last preceding interest payment adjustment date.
SECTION 8. In all cases where the work necessary to be done in
connection with the making of such improvement is carved out pursuant to contract
upon competitive bids (and the City shall have and reserves the right to reject any and
all bids), the call for bids shall include a statement that payment for such work will be
made in cash warrants drawn upon the Local Improvement Fund.
SECTION 9. The Local Improvement Fund for the District is created
and established in the office of the Finance Department Director of the City. The
proceeds from the sale of revenue warrants or other short-term obligations drawn
against the fund which may be issued and sold by the City and the collections of
special assessments, interest and penalties thereon shall be deposited in the Local
Improvement Fund. Cash warrants to the contractor or contractors in payment for the
work to be done by them in connection with the improvement and cash warrants in
. payment for all other items of expense in connection with the improvement shall be
issued against the Local Improvement Fund
SECTION 10. Within fifteen (15) days of the passage of this ordinance
there shall be filed with the Finance Department Director of the City the title of the
improvement and District number, a copy of the diagram or print showing the
boundaries of the District and the preliminary assessment roll or abstract of such roll
showing thereon the lots, tracts and parcels of land that will be specially benefited
thereby and the estimated cost and expense of such improvement to be borne by each
lot, tract or parcel of land. The Finance Department Director of the City immediately
shall post the proposed assessment roll upon her index of local improvement
assessments against the properties affected by the local improvement.
•
-5- LID 356 Formation Ordinance
50396206 01
SECTION]]. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force five (5)
days from and after its passage, approval, and publication as required by law.
JIM WHITE, MAYOR
ATTEST:
BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK
I
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
FOSTER PEPPER& SHEFELMAN PLLC
Special Counsel and Bond Counsel
Passed the day of September, 2003.
Approved the day of September, 2003.
1 Published the day of September, 2003.
5039620601
-6- LID 356 Formation Ordinance
50396206 01
CERTIFICATION
I, the undersigned, City Clerk of the City of Kent, Washington, hereby certify
as follows:
1. The attached copy of Ordinance No. is a full, true and correct copy
of an ordinance duly passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City held at
the regular meeting place thereof on September 2, 2003, as that ordinance appears on
the minute book of the City; and the ordinance will be in full force and effect five (5)
days after the publication of its summary in the City's official newspaper; and
2. A quorum of the members of the City Council was present throughout the
meeting and a majority of those members present voted in the proper manner for the
passage of the ordinance.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this day of
September, 2003.
CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON
BRENDA JACOBER, City Clerk
I
50396206 01
EXHIBIT "A"
LID 356
I l llh AVENUE S E. SANITARTY SEWERS
(S.E. 256T11 STREET TO 850 FEET NORTH)
BOUNDARY LEGAL DESCRIPTION
LOTS 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 1.3, 15, 16, 17 AND 20, COATES ADDITION, ACCORDING TO
THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 78 OF PLATS, PAGE 76, RECORDS OF KING
COUNTY, WASHINGTON;
EXCEPT ANY PORTIONS OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN LYING WITHIN
PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY.
S PCDS Carol LID 336 OouwLry Levi f JnAn A 4uJ 0 Jae
EXHIBIT "B"
LID 356
SANITARY SEVER IMPROVEMENTS
The proposed project is the construction of an S" sanitary sexN er system with 6" side seiner stubs
to the right of%vay line for each of the I 1 properties included in the L.I.D. boundary.
The construction will include S" sewer at the folloning locations:
ON FROM TO
I I Vh Avenue S E. S.E. 2561h Street Approximately 850 Feet North
S PCDS Carol LID 336 Dowulaq Legal Gluhm 1 and n Jm
Kent City Council Meeting
Date September 2, 2003
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: RODENHAUSER LATECOMER AGREEMENT—AUTHORIZE
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Darrell Rodenhauser has extended the sanitary sewer
main to serve his property along SE 274"' Street including three additional lots. Two
owners have negotiated directly with Mr. Rodenhauser to pay their proportion of the
cost. The Public Works Committee has recommended authorizing the Public Works
Director to execute a sewer latecomer agreement with Darrell Rodenhauser for the
remaining lot.
3. EXHIBITS: Public Works Director's memo and vicinity map
4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 6D
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Don E. Wickstrom, P.E. Public Works Director
Phone:253-856-5500
Fax: 253-856-6500
KENT W A S N I M G T O N Address. 220 Fourth Avenue S.
Kent,WA 98032-5895
DATE: 8/ 03
TO: M r hite and Kent City Council
FROM: ickstrom, Public Works Director
THROUGH:
SUBJECT: Rodenhauser Latecomer Agreement
MOTION: Recommend Council authorization for the Public Works Director to execute
a Sewer Latecomer Agreement with Darrell Rodenhauser for the Rodenhauser Sewer
Extension
SUMMARY: Homeowner, Darrell Rodenhauser, has requested a sewer latecomer agreement for
his extension of the city's sanitary sewer main. Four lots benefit from the extension, including
Mr. Rodenhauser's home. Two neighbors have negotiated directly with Mr. Rodenhauser to pay
their proportion of the cost, and he would like to record a latecomer agreement against the
remaining parcel. The total project cost is $37,430, and the cost per lot is calculated at$9,357.50.
The Public Works Director requests authorization to enter into a latecomer agreement with this
developer.
BUDGET IMPACT: No Unbudgeted Fiscal/Personnel Impact
BACKGROUND:
Mayor White and Kent City Council Rodenhauser Sewer Latecomer Agreement-Authorize
August 4, 2003
1
r Y ux w21G,1o. .-
Tl,D R PAOi'�A'lY'A�iD 18 NOT GDAR"TE-p
J2�'��t1Yk'-�1�T8•. '"O,dIiU�ACGZ7�'fE JR.�ai T9 !'�
r _ _
2'5
L A DJ.
7E, 33o.as n�.ee-1+9 z1• W. ago- 13 1.42 c
n
3
o
fA
_ ID . 3 13� Oo 30 30 1 3 00 135.'�5 30 90
,0
0 r 16 0170 m 01�o Colo r
r
1•b S.73 ' 135 33 !
15 alto 2 15 2
0310 01so 00'10
135.31 w is S•31 ti
' 14 3 a °, 14 3 3 ' o = ,
o�p0 a 0190 o11O a dC3° h
d
i 13 ' e'i90 " Dzao 4 13 o In 4 cn R
J 01,1 00'�0
135z7 - pOlj - t3sZ7 J
J also 02.10 O I t0 0060
h
13S ZS " O •' 135 Z5 N
I I 01#70 6 - " I I 6 N
0110 01/0 COO
g 1352 •• 0 ! •• t-35 Z•3 ° 1
D 0
ui ° 0 In 0
r 1 Oto 7 r N 10 pj80 00T0 7 r rj
ozso r u
N as, 49 zI" N 8 49• 1- W. 0
135.2! •• t3S.21 •, V
9 0>5o y oty° 8 ',S' 0090 C0#0' 8. rt
r
u ills. 19 135 00 �a So 135 00 13 !� So jG
330 19 r.=. ee' so• S5- 1tr -3 0. 1 t^��
S.E. 274TH ST. s'z _1 N N
HJ.1s 90 v° 10 t t33.]2
�O q 11�0 T O 19 L-..O 21�a 0. 22'` O2r Ir
n at. 190 q o I 0110 �+ n 00l0
1or.r 0 d9o0 yp�p210 I 1.a.s n n 1os.7t
90 =, 0 IW
1'7 n I a �,. h'. j0 2.3 M w P n
q
01^0 '9 051D °p 9PPe5/� ( �, p730 W d020It ; 0
03 C �1 �e w 1 > 103
o Q c
29 r1
Kent City Council Meeting
Date September 2, 2003
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: SENSITIVE AREA QUITCLAIM DEED FROM THE BOEING
COMPANY- AUTHORIZE
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works Committee,
accept from the Boeing Company by sensitive area quitclaim deed approximately 10.98
acres of real property located at the Northeast intersection of S. 196 h Street and 72°d
Ave. S subject to the City Attorney's and the Public Works Director's concurrence of
the language therein.
3. EXHIBITS: Public Works Director memorandum and sensitive area quitclaim deed
4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 6E
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Don E. Wickstrom, P E Public Works Director
Phone:253-856-5500
Fax 253-856-6500
K E N T
W A S N I N O T O N Address 220 Fourth Avenue S.
Kent,WA 98032-5895
DATE: Aug t 9, 2003
TO: M rte and Kent City Council
FROM: Don tckstrom, Public Works Director
THROUGH-
SUBJECT: Acceptance of a Sensitive Area Quitclaim Deed for approximately 10.98
acres of a wetland mitigation site from the Boeing Company located at S.
196th Street and 72"d Ave. S.
MOTION:
Recommend accepting from the Boeing Company by sensitive area quitclaim deed
approximately 10.98 acres of real property located at the Northeast intersection of S.
196th Street and 72nd Ave. S.
SUMMARY:
Accept from The Boeing Company Sensitive Area Quitclaim Deed totaling approximately 10.98
acres of wetlands adjacent to Mill Creek, a salmonid bearing stream. Parcels ID Nos. 331060-
0100-05; 331060-0375-03, 331060-0385-01
BUDGETIMPACT:
None. The Boeing Company is responsible for maintenance and monitoring of the site for a ten-
year period. After that period, the site will remain in its natural condition and little if any fiscal
impacts will result from the property. The site has been heavily planted with trees and shrubs
and will be a forested wetland at the end of the ten-year monitoring period.
BACKGROUND:
As a part of the SEPA conditions of Pacific Gateway, The Boeing Company was required to
dedicate in a separate tract or record a Sensitive Area Easement. The site is the location of the
wetland mitigation from wetland impacts on the Pacific Gateway site located at the northwest
intersection of S. 212'h Street and West Valley Highway. The site contains healthy forested
wetlands adjacent to Mill Creek and 3.49 acres of created wetland adjacent to Mill Creek, a
salmonid bearing stream. The mitigation plan was approved by the Unites States Army Corps of
Engineers, the Department of Ecology and the City of Kent. The Boeing Company is
responsible for maintenance and monitoring of the site for a 10-year period. This property is an
excellent acquisition for the City of Kent due to the quality of the wetlands and habitat potential
for salmontds, amphibians and other terrestrial and aquatic species in the Mill Creek watershed.
Mayor White and Kent City Council The Boeing Company Wetland Mitigation Property
August 4,2003 1
WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO:
Property A1anagement
City of Kent
220 Fourth Avenue South
Kent, Washington 98032
Grantor: The Boeing Company
Grantee: City of Kent
Abbreiiated Legal Description: Portions of the North '/2 of the NW Y. of Section 1, T22N,
R4E,W N1.
Additional Legal Description on page 5 and 6 of Document.
Assessor's Tax Parcel I Nos. 331060-0100-05. 331060-0375-03; and 331060-0355-01
Project Nance: Boeing Pacific Gateway Parcel -t Wetland Mitigation Site
Document Date: July 22, 2003
SENSITIVE AREA QUITCLAIM DEED
(Corporate)
THE BOEING COMPANY ("Grantor"), a Delaware corporation,for and in consideration
of mutual benefits derived and/or other valuable consideration receipt of ++hich is hereby
acknowledged by Grantor,conveys and quit claims to CITY OF KENT, a Washington municipal
corporation, ("Grantee") for municipal purposes relating to sensitive areas preservation and
maintenance, the following described real property situated in King County, State of
Washington,including any after acquired title ([be "Property"):
SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED
SENSITIVE AREA QUITCLAIM DEED-Pege 1 of 6
(Gen,•ecn The Bocing Company and Gay of Kew)
This deed does not relieve the Grantors' successors, heirs and assiens from any pic%ious
obligations within the described sensitive area,including, vothout limitation the follo\Nina:
Ll Grantor shall post a maintenance bond for the Nt etland on the Property for ten (O
)ears after recording of this deed, and said bond shall be in accord with Exhibit
"B" attached and incorporated by this reference.
1.2 Grantor shall maintain the Property in accordance pith the requirements of the
State of Washington, Department of Ecology attached as Exhibit "C" and
incorporated by this reference and Grantor shall ha\e, and heiehy reserves to
itself, the right to enter the Property from time to time to inspect the Property, to
ensute that it complies with said requirements, and to perform such maintenance,
repairs, replacements, restorations, renewals, and other work as may be necessary
in connection with such requirements. Without limiting the generality of the
foregoing, the Grantor hereby indicates, pursuant to the requirement in Exhibit
"C" titled "Deed Restriction" that the wetland mitigation areas of the Property are
"waters of the state."
1.3 Grantor shall maintain the Property in accord Wtth the requirements of the Army
Corp of Engineers, attached as Exhibit "D" and incorporated by this reference and
Grantor shall have,and hereby reserves to itself, the right to enter the Property
from time to time to inspect the Property, to ensure that it complies with said
requirements, and to perform such maintenance, repairs, replacements, iene»-als,
and other work as may be necessary in connection with such requirements.
The conxcyance and quitclaim hereunder is further subject io the follo%%ing I
2.1 The Grantor hereby reserves to itself in its capacity as Corporate Trustee for the
Western Processing Trust Fund 11 the right to enter the Property from time to time
as necessary to comply with the requirements of the Consent Decree in Cause No.
C83-252A4 dated April 10, 1987, and without limiting the generality of the
foregoing to inspect, maintain, repair, replace, restore, renew, and, as necessary
decommission the extraction wells, monitoring wells, and piezometers referred to
in Exhibit "E' and to obtain readings and/or samples from such extraction wells,
monitoring wells, and piezometers. Grantor agrees that in exercising any of the
rights it reserved under this Quit Claim Deed should Grantor determine that it is
necessary to decommission any extraction wells, monitoring wells, and
piezometers, Grantor shall obtain prior written approval for such work from all
applicable agencies, and Grantor shall repair any property damage caused by
Grantor during the course of said work to the satisfaction of Grantee.
2.2 The Grantor hereby reserves to itself in its capacity as Corporate Trustee for the
Western Processing Trust Fund 11 the right to enter the Properly from time to time
to inspect, maintain, repair, replace, restore, renew, and othemise perform work
SENSITIVE AREA QUITCLAIM DEED-Pac-e 2 of G
(beriveen The Boeing Company and City of Ken )
on the folIowing features dcscnbed in Exhibit "U: Detention Basin,Slurry WalI,
Site Cap Storm Drain System; Access Roadways; Mill Cieek Culrcil and Slope
Protection; Area 1X Cover; and Fence.
2.3 The Grantee,for itself and its successors and assigns, agrees for the benefit of The
Boeing Company in its capacity as Corporate Trustee for the Western Processin,
Trust Fund II that the Grantee will not tale any action that a ould disturb,damage,
or alter the Extraction Wells, Monitoring Wells, Piezometers, Detention Basin,
Slurry Wail,Site Cap Storm Drain System, Access Roadways, Mill Geed Cuh en
and Slope Protection, Area IX Cover, and Fence described in E,.h:bit "E". The
Grantee's acceptance of and agreement to the foregoing shall be evidenced by the
recording of this Quitclaim Deed in the records of King County, Washington.
Such agreements shall be cotenants that tun with the land and shall bind the
successors in title of the Grantee.
2.4 Pursuant to the requirements of XI1.C.3 of the Consent Decree in Cause No. C83-
2521\1 dated April 10, 1987, The Boeing Company, a Delauvaie corporation,
hereby notifies the Grantee and any potential purchaser of the real properly
described in this Quitclaim Deed that the use of groundwater beneath the Property
may be restricted and anyone seeking to use such groundwater must comply with
the present and future restrictions placed on the use of groundwater by the City of
Kent, the State of Washington Department of Ecology, and their successors.
5 Grantor agrees that in exercising any of the rights it reserved under this Quit
Claim Deed should Grantor's acuity cause loss of or damage to .iny property,
Grantor shall repair any such loss or damage to the satisfaction of the Grantee.
GRANTOR:
THE n -,EING COT\TANY
b X lg
Y
its A orized Signatory
DATE: 710 7 03
(Norar).Public Acknur+lcdgcrncerAppenrs on Neal Page)
SENSITIVE AREA QUITCLAIM DEED-Page 3 of G
(ben,ccn The Boeing Cnmpany arid Cray of Kcnr)
STATE OF WAS HINGTON )
ss.
COUNTY OF KING )
On this day of - ,—�i _—, 2003, before me a Notary Public in and for
the State ofWashington, personallyapheared to me knok\n to be
the Authorized Signatory of THE BOEING COl\IPANY, a Delaware corporation, that executed
the forewino instrument, and acknowledocd it to be the flee and Voluntary act of said corporation,
for the uses and purposes mentioned in this instrument, and on oath stated Chit they \\ere
authorized to execute said instrument.
-VoJan•(af dfan Appa or n•uJnn flat Rt,r-
W WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and official sea] the
day and year first abo\e\\ritten.
\ntni ifr11�
O\\�Ep E C• ejeiei
IOMP rr�i�� ` 1
NOTARY PUBLIC, in and for the State of Wash gton
residing at 1'Gi'1 I t1
My appointment expnes ( � ti I f
APPROVED AS TO FORM.
Kent City Attorney
P Scn.... �rc.F7wwCl�unDcc�l1 Jw.
SENSITIVE AREA QUITCLAIM DEED-Page a of 6
(bcrlrecn 77Je Bocing Companp and Glp tJKew)
EximnIT A
EXHIBIT"A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTIO14:
PARCELA:
THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH 112 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 1,TOWNSHIP 22 NORTH,
RANGE 4 EAST W.M , DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 1, BEING THE INTERSECTION OF
THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION AND THE EAST MARGIN OF A 60 FOOT STRIP OF LAND
CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF KENT FOR 72"D AVENUE SOUTH BY DOCUMENT RECORDED UNDER
KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 8709180746,
THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST MARGIN 678 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 89022'00" EAST TO THE WEST MARGIN OF THE PUGET SOUND ELECTRIC RAILROAD
RIGHT-OF-WAY;
THENCE NORTH 00047'00"WEST ALONG SAID WEST MARGIN. 678 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID
SECTION 1;
THENCE SOUTH 89022'00"WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO POINT OF BEGINNING,
EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONDEMNED FOR DRAINAGE DITCH NO. 1 UNDER KING COUNTY
SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NO. 32912,
(ALSO KNOWN AS LOTS 3, 4 AND A PORTION OF 5 TOGETHER WITH A 30 FOOT STRIP ADJACENT ON�
THE NORTH, LYING BETWEEN THE PUGET SOUND ELECTRIC RAILROAD 91GHT-CF-'.%';'Y;.IID A 60
FOOT STRIP OF LAND CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF KENT FOR 72I'D AVENUE SOUTH UNDER KING
COUNTY RECORDING NO 8709180746 OF HIGHWAY HOME GARDEN TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE
UNRECORDED PLAT THEREOF);
SITUATE IN THE CITY OF KENT, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON.
PARCEL B-
THE WEST 160 FEET OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED TRACT:
THAT PART OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 114 OF SECTION 1,TOWNSHIP 22 NORTH,
RANGE 4 EAST W-M., DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS.
BEGINNING AT A POINT WHICH IS NORTH 89022'00" EAST 1,365 FEET AND SOUTH 678 FEET FROM
NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION,
THENCE SOUTH 655 28 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF DWYER COCHRANE COUNTY ROAD NO. 1124
(SOUTH 196T" STREET);
THENCE ALONG SAID ROAD LINE NORTH 89032'00" EAST 363 10 FEET TO WESTERLY LIIJE OF
SEATTLE-TACOMA INTERURBAN RAILWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY,NOW PUGET SOUND ELECTRIC
RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY;
SENSITIVE AREA QUITCLAIM DEED-Page 5 of 6
(Gent ecn 7lic!loving Company and City of Kent)
THENCE ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE 14ORTH 00047'00"WEST 656 31 FEET,
THENCE SOUTH 89022*00"WEST 354.12 FEET TO BEGINNING,
(BEING TRACT 23 OF UNRECORDED PLAT OF HIGHWAY HOIv',E GARDEN TRACTS),
SITUATE IN THE CITY OF KENT,COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON.
PARCEL C'
THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH 112 OF THE NORTHWEST 114 OF SECTION 1,TOWNSHIP 22 NORTH,
RANGE 4 EAST W M , DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A POINT WHICH IS NORTH 89`22'00" EAST 1,365 FEET AND SOUTH 678 FEET FROM
THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION-DIVISION,
THENCE SOUTH 655.28 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF DWYER COCHRANE COUNTY ROAD NO 1124
(SOUTH 196T"STREET);
THENCE ALONG SAID ROAD LINE NORTH 89"32'00" EAST 363 10 FEET TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF
SEATTLE-TACOMA INTERURBAN RAILWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY(NOW PUGET SOUND ELECTRIC
RAILROAD PIGHT-OF-WAY);
THENCE ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE NORTH 00047'00"WEST 656 31 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 89022'00"WEST 354.12 FEET TO POINT OF BEGINNING;
EXCEPT THE WEST 160 FEET THEREOF AS CONVEYED TO THE AUSTIN PARTNERSHIP,A
WASHINGTON LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, BY DEED RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO.
8201150028;
(BEING TRACT 240E UNRECORDED PLAT OF HIGHWAY HOME GARDEN TRACTS, AND VACATED
STREET ON THE EAST);
SITUATE IN THE CITY OF KENT,COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON
SENSI FIVE AREA QUITCLAITA DEED - Page 6 of 6
(Gcfirccn The Bocung Comq)any and City of Kcnt)
E\::IBIT B
OCJ PO PL-RFOR.-NIANICE BOND
Luna Nc). 10-lil;?,r;ti
KNi A\' :\Li, Ii TIIFSi: that ,\e. 'I he il,,ll. and
TravcICI.i Crltiu;lIIV olld Surd) Coll Ipally ol•;l III elica. .i1 Surcty. .IIC held spud ]it III]v
bound unto ('in' in ilsu tmm of 1•ifo. lour Thcxrz.t d Unc HLIOLIIcd
1~•r•ll; 1•c,uransl (_l(1.1i1O 1)�?lla::ti 1`:i-1.1�-1.001, i�r�r Isayiu�•ist ��hcrrol�yai�l 1':incih.11 anal
Surety hind Ihcntuly��, their hehs. c�.rcuttttti, adminiar.vi>ls, succcs�uts :u:d :►�ai,�ns,
tClimIV and se"erally, filmy by thrsu prebcllls.
\\,'IIhIZE-ALS, the above-bound I'tincipal has uur►plctrd the plant in;tailatiOn outimcd in
the City of Kent appto\cd \\'clland hliti!Ualillll flan thevised) P.1C111C CtalcN,l\' Dusinzo,
Pal k prepared by Chad armour. T.I.0 dated AuvwA. 'tln? (\\ ellat;d 11iti�atic,ll I'{,su);
�'. herons. as :t condition of the approved Weiland Mitigation Phil. 1'tmcip;il Ims a�(greed to
post a bond or other ,urety in the 1111 111111 of I-- perccnt of the 01'the r\prctcLl colt
to icplace the installed plants should they fail 10 51111—iVc and the t;ot1t to mcmitnr and
maintain the remstrtu•tion area dulirl�� tile 10-vcar tnntjiiol inu pel Iod
Nc )W. T111:1:1 FORT-. TI ll: C t NDI I It tN I I1L .\tits\T t!ril iG\ I MN Iti st'C11.
th;►t if the ahu\c-natllCLI PrillCip,d, its suCCCSS ►r, docs ;md shall \+dl and troy
petfunn, fulfill and peep its i,hlipausms .►s' sct li)rth in (lie allove-mcnt:on,d
:111.)1ovc•d We Altti alion 1'lalI. IOT ',�III ch :1 h011(I IIUFI hr 1)4)strd, 11hm thr .lhn\e
obligation shall be temmiated: ntherm"C the obligation sh.tll remain in tull JOICr,:rld
ell�c•t.
'I'l IIS BOND \%ill tun for a three t 3t-ec,ir Icim cltec•tive March 6. 300;
-1-1 HS BONr) 15 til.'iui: : l', hss«c�cr. to the lullo�+iu� condition';:
FIRST: That in the c\eni s,l'a dcl•;udt oa the pall uJ the Princip'll. its or
as-Si-'ns, a Written statement ofsuch default v ith full dclatls ttxrcofsh.,ll the okunio
t.
Surety promptly. :utut in :uly crcut, \\ilhin six (6) months alter illu Obhucc shall learn (it
titich del:ltilt. Such notice tti be ►Icli"cict{ of by registered mall In Cube\ at -11
�lulnrul Bl\'d.. Naperville. 11. 60563-845S.
SI:C'UND: That no Claill), Suit or action tuldcl IhiS burnt by reamm of ally a:ch s►d:rlllt
Shall he hrollbhl .le"Aillst Surct}• tltlll�.,s asseaed ur commencrJ Millirl lV,ncc (1_') mon'111,v
after the effective date of any tetmination or c.m.cellatton of thi-, hand.
0
l f Hh1 ): 111;It ill �'l�Icr I,o -,;: isfv the 10-Nc,ir bond lllg ICCILlil-Ci11L]It-i iil Ill C ;11'hl'it1ed
WeLIand MiIintion Plan thi, bond may he atitc III aticaIIy Icncv,•Cf-I liar IN',o (2 ) add II;ol
Ili rce (;)- -car grins .uld ells ( I ) add Itirnal I-year term, ullIess or
c,ulr,lt.:�
Sill-Cty by tililty (30) days' hlicrr notice ill miting lrom Surety to P►limpal and Oblige,
such iiolice to be iv;:n by certified mail and acknowledUed by said Obli"cc. Skid)
termination or cancellation shall not affect amv liability incurred or aCLILied under this
bend prior to the effective daue ul'such termination or carlccllallon. Ilic liability of tl,
Surety shall be limited to the annuult �cl furth ;illd is not cumulali\ e. Such tcinmimil,
;hall, not affect PI111CIr;l1's obligation to ti-Itisly the IU-war bolldlJl`trC�JllllelllZm.
F(_)l.RTH: That no riolit ufaction S11,111 accrue under this bond to of for the tiw uf.ui
lI.crs<1n other than the t-)hli`TM.
I N. WITNI-SS I HER}-OF. the abOVC-lll1lind Nrinclixil and Sulcty h vcheret:ndc.1. -,:t
111� it liands Lind seals on the 26day ol'March. 2003.
The Boeing Coil zany
Avi "A . I-►�cll e lL
ksis�oal'+ Tre ksurer-
Travcll is C'astialty and Surety Company of Amcerica
i
13� .
C.R. I lernandez, Altoona-ill-1 ,ict T
I I(tN El FRS(A%UAL I Y AN)SI,Rk I Y C0%IFAJ4Y OF ANI).RICA
I DLAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURE I Y (W1114tiY
FkRMI'sG I ON CA%1141.TY CONPA4NY
Hartford,Conaccntcut 061S3-9I62
VONVEI(OF.V'1 f01LNEY ANit CERI IP!C.VIE OF AUTHORITY OF ATTORN :1'(S►-IN f1C1
KNOW ALL PERSONS UY 'f11ESE YRESEN7S, IILVI' IFUiVELERS CASUALTY Vil) SURE11 CONIPINY OF
ANIERICA, TRAVELFRS CASUALTY AND SURETY CONIPANY and FAPNi NG1ON CVSUaITY CONIPAti1',
corporations duly urganacd under the lasts of the State of Connecticut, and having their principal offices in Ute City of ii-utfuld,
County of Hanford, State of Conneclieut, (hereinafter the "Companies") Rath made, constituted and appointed, dnd do by Ihe(r
prescnts make, constitute and appoint Tbcodore C.Sevier,Jr.,C. R. Ifernandev, Ralph E. Nosal, Kalhtnnt J. Forril, Dchn It.
Kecbler,Sandra Notakon ski,Joseph R. Poplan'ski,Shelly K Szymczak,of Chicago. Illinois, their Iruc and laniful Aliernc)(+
in-Fact, with full power and authonly hereby conferred to sign,excatle and acV..no%v1cJge, at any place %anion the Un.ttd St iics,the
folloaung utstrunienl(s) by his/her sole signature and act, any and all bonds, recogninniccs, coniraUs of mdeinruty, and who
vvntings obligatory in the nature of a bond,recognizance, or conditional undcnal.ing and any and all cerstss u,ndet.l Ihenclu And 10
bind the Companies, thereby as fully and to tic same extent as if the same were signed by the duly audiorind ufficcrs of the
Companies, and all the acts of-aid Ationtcy(s)-in-Fact,pursuant to the authority herein given,are hereby ratified and confirmed
This appointment is made under and by authority of the follosung Standing Resolutions of said ConlpaulCs, '60101 Itc•-,oluUons art
now in full force and efrect-
VOT ID. Thal the Cluimnaq the President,any Vice Cl"wa.-L,aq Executive Vice Nc%idrnt,any Scoot Vrce Presiki t,wy Nnct President.rp.v
Second Vice Ncsidenl, the 1.casuter,say Assistant Traxaucr, the Corlrrete Sccictu) or any AssiA lud Secretary may apuunt Attourcys-tin.Foct
and Agents to act for and on hAalf of Lhe company and may Roe %uch appointee arch au honly as his or her cer ufrcute of autbrnty may prcagce
to sign with the Cornii'my's name and seal with Lic Compa•r)'s seal tx,nds,tecopu.•-.racs,co:,(:a_t% of rude-nn•I),:,n,t-_'ha :a,w vs%mi,iiaiu•e.n
the itatwe of a Loud, rceuycil rue, or cundlional wJertal rig, and wn of said otLccis or the hoard of Duecluis at ui% tune in rcmc%c any sxh
appointee and re%oke the poucr given hen or her
VOTED That Ure Chsuuian,the Picsidmt,Luny Vice Chairman, art) Exctuuve Vice President, an) tientor Vice President ul wry VrtC 111es3Jcrt
rray delegate all or any part of the foregoing authonly to one or more Writers or employees of Uus cony'Cly,ptusrdcd chat cash uIA delegation is
in venting and a copy thereof is filed to the office of Ute Seciela y
VO FEL) That any bond, secogsnanee, contract of indemnity, or varung obligatory ut die natuic of a bund, iccognuanct, or cnndoinnsl
undertaking shall be valid and binding upon the Comtan) %khtn(a)signed by the Prendent,any Vice(Amman,any Execuuie Vice PicsiJud,a;n
Senior Vice larexndenl or any Vice)hesident, any Second Vice lYandent,the Treoswer, wiy Asstuuud Trcanucr, the Corpa-ale Cecremry or mry
Assistnrit Secretary and duly nucsted and sealed wilh the Cumpany's%cal by a Secretary or A%sr.lant Secretary,or (b)duly exetuttd(w1dcY seal,if
required)by one or more Auoine)s-m-Fact aid Agents lxusuaut to the power picscnbt:d un his or her 1.011fntdle or that cenihcaics of authotd)a
by one or nioic Compwiy ufficns pur%uunl to a %%ripen delegation of mudronly
This Pom er of Attorney mad Certificate of Authority is signed and sealed by facsimile (mechanical or printed)t ndcr and by
authority of the following Standing Resolulioo soled by The Boards of Directors of TRAVELERS CASUAL'I Y AND SURVI Y
COMPANY OF A11fERICA, TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COWANY and FARAIINGION CASUALTY
COMPANY,nhich Re%olulioa is now in full force and effect: a
VOTF1) lh3t the signature of each of the folloxwg cfTvcrs Vic%idcnl, any C-xecutue Vite President, any Sentor Vice President, any Viet
President, arty AssisLvd Vice Prt%idant, an) Secretary,may Ac%istanl Scoctary, and the %UI of the Company rimy k afrowd b)fdtsmnde to eu)
power of attorney or to airy certificate relating Uncicto appointing Resident Vrtc Picsidods, Rt%idtnt A%snlant Sccreta,res or 4tio•11c)s-1J1-F0(t fen
purposes only of eaccuung and attesting bonds and undertakings and other vntings obligatory in the natwe theicuf,aid any such poacr of allomcv
or certificate bearing such focsunile signature or facsimile seal slidll tic valid and binding upon the Company and any such pouter so exeeuied wd
testified by such Facsimile signature and Facsimile sot shill he valid and binding upon lie Compan) in die fulwC%11h MPctt In any bond ar
under*�kirg to%%hitch it is auachcd.
STATE OF 1LLINOIS
COMN i'Y OF COOK
1. Tr-+ :Ej R. 'r'aA-,lr-r _ r a Notary Public in -and for said County, do hcreby
certify that C.R. fiarnir1-L Attorney-in-tact, of the:
Travelers Casualty and Surety Company A Connecticut Corporation
Of A=trka
Travelers Casuatty and Surety Company A Connecticut Corporation
Farmtatton Caraalty Company A Connecticut Corporation
who is penona.11y known to me to be the same. person whose name is subscribed to the forego
instrument, appeared before me this day in person, and acknowledged that they signed, sell
and delivered said instnunent for and on behalf of:
T rs:rekrs Casualty and Surety Company A Connecticut Corporation
Travelers Casualty and Surety Company A Conaccticat if�orporatlon
Farmington Cmuslty Company A Connecticut Corporation
for the uses and purposes therein set forth.
Given under my hand and notarial seal at my office in the City of Chlcaeo in said County,
2G day of r•tisd, AD -,-W3
Notary Public
"OFFICIAL SEAL"
DEBRA R. 1:EEELLR
i Notery Public. Stale of ri nois
My Comrni.slon &prtes 130,103 ;
Exinni r C
.lal! 111 1\AL111:�1.IfrN
\IIrr;111Ll 14"PL':I11 O lilie 11,101111011t.. .11' �l Iil'::11. 1'. 111.1.11"rl'•; '• i{I'1-:j�_ 1_.'!:h -�1.:•I
A w;II,I I'>. .(!tl_
REGIS l•L'RED NIA I I.
RR, 359 S92 80; 1 :C
%ir Phil Qd,t l
P,ocine heallili-Coll-tor:tien
I'U liitx 3 UI, 't1C :R-79
Seattle, \'rA 9SI24-2207
De.lr Mr. C thu11-
RF. Urdern02SEANR-4579
ll S Army Cvrp� s + :�-00.4.1`ll1.9 - \ .ALI Q;Mlil ( 01111CIIIIA-11 o I,IJI /041C
Con;i,lrnt v Di.lei mitution litr ufip),151u '_ 31 ALIL>ul'ttLIhildS ti11 CC'nUlIIC1It)] ul I'.ILlllc
C;e;ctt:� fluLinLS, I'.uh, I:cnt. Wa=hln_'tun"
I-Ile Ierluc.t lOr ccIitric,tton for plrpL+sed .t.r1 Ill ttctl:nds adjaccnl Iu hull C,-CLl,11.1S '.vcn r L u tt J. C-11
h�11,11f t11 tllc Sta:e of\1',Ishlltcton, tte Lcrlily dim the prupo�t:d t+ttrl..•»Lon, 11i1'ned hr the u'Llo.L,I
(hdt.r, a 111 comply tL Ith applicAtle I,rov itiLu',ttl tic(tltm, ;DI. .n'_, MI. '06.1uJ 30' Ill 11L ("IL.w \\.dcl
ALI. aS .U)ILIlded. )fill t4111.1 .11,1111•Itrl Ilc ILt1nnL'nLnl; 1 I "1:!IC I:•,t. 111' !Ltter nho :LI\t 1 ,: dlL ',1 do
rcNpows c 111 Ihr l m p% ol'l n_•InCL.I . 0
I'utul:nit its i6 0 S C. 1 1:6 el sell (SeLtt,llt 4-tcN.)/tf the Cr),1.+1 /une M.a I),,cm Ltd '\LI of 19'3 a,
.1111L:nded). 1-c(Joey concurs tt ilh Ilse aIll111eenl'e dclermin)IlL n 111.11 Illk tttn1, a Ill he (0:IskILIII a 01 the
ahprot ed Wa;Itln!_lon St)tc C mIslal Zone hl)n:l,enlrnt I'tuLl:mt- IIIIS u)lie Ill Lncc I, b 1.LII IIP,M the
applicant's compli:ntLc tt ith fill .Ipplic)hIC u11VILL.011c puliLlcs 1 111C C 11.1-1121 /unc MAIM-2,uu,nt Iht�•_1aM.
includin,_SecuLm 401 or Ilse I'cJLral Walcl Pttilutt(In Conucl Act.
This rcltlliwttnn IC suhjecl to the condutons contanted In the etlLlllsed Clldrr If\ou het(')nyq:lc,tirm.
please contact.Alice Kelly ;it (•125) fi 19-71.1 i W1111cn LOMBILI 1.CAll he,urt tit hu )1 the Ihlt.nunenl ill
L,Lolouv, 31110— 1601" Ave SF. RLIIL;uc, WA 9%0OA'. 1 he LtILIu.Ld OI.ILI nl,l) lie q'I'valud by
follov. the prtKL(lulc, Llc.0 IbLd In the(h,icl.
tiincr,rl_y. ,1
I L'.tllllll' III I111IrIhaL$
Sh,/rclands,:nd 1-mironnlull.d A-,st,I,ncc hoemilt
IS A 11
! Itclil�.utc
(c ILn1.uh.In Sn1iIll,('utp. ul l ncnlLrl ,
.n1� Fi,hu, \\'I)I W
• 1'tt•unc I Iht•a. l_Lulr�i
C hrts .%u,Ilit. Ill oic, I I)n ICI sit'II, 1111.
I Lan Roth
.L
I)E11ARTMFNT OF ECOL06
NORti I"]iW 1ST REGION,\, OFFICE
IN THE MATTER Or r.RANTitiV A ) O1LUUP, it 02)SEAINU-4579
WATEIt ()i- A LIT V } Corps Reference 4' 2)(100-4-011279
CERTIFICATION TO ) Place-ment of hIi In 2.19 -.,cm of,\ctlan(i; tid tLc
IloeiIir Neatly Curporation 1 colistillction ill' Il,k'11ic tJ;U,C:\\,1\ Busmcbs I'-1, in
ill occoldance \\ith 33 U.S.C. I "11 ) i:ent, Iocatcd in S,_�ctlons _2 and 11, T . „ N., R.
1:`A1PCA $ 401, RC\4' ()0.4S 260 ;lmd ► 4 E.. King Comity, \V islull,_,tal
Chapter 1 13-201 A WAC )
TO: Mr. Phil cybu1t
130cinS Fealty Coil oration
PO Buv 3707, MC
Seattle, \VA 9.9121-2207
On May 6. 2002, a puhlic notice fora proposed ovatei quality ceilificalinn fi nnl the St;ltc of
Washington \\'l15 distiibuted for the abu\e-rderencA pr(�JC(A ptlrsuml. to the prmhiuns of 33
I:.S C. 1341 (P\'dPCA §401). I he propclscd pluiccl clllail, placcnicnl oflill Ini ctlm"tluctiund"i
busln:ss p;1lk. LStimaled \\•eiland fill for lead ciossing \\ould he 0.49 acle. hullJinW_Z, lnt-
an, landscapI \\ill l 11 1 7 acie. .md 0.12 .Ilrc \\ill be inlp,locd by a 3-.Icic avrin,\ .tcr Jelclnil:i
rt�, d. lior a total \\cthild 1111;lAt ;11 .1 id ) ; I JC10,
The nff-site mitiuLition prupusal includes cicatilln of3.48 at res of P.11ustlirl:: Cnllr cnt. sclub-
shrub, and l )restcd \\•01,111d on an 1 1-acre llaiccl lucalcd adjacent to Mill C're k abollt 1 .00U 1,%1
nuithc;ist of the proposed development. An additional 0.91 acres of e\istin; lo\\•quality ellielvell
and scrub-shrub wetlands \\ill be cidianccd to a forested floodpl;li 1 \\ct1,
AUTHORITIES:
In exercising mithoiity under 33 U.S.C. 134 I , 16 U.S.C. 1456, and RCNV 90.481-60• Fcolog.;hay
investigated this application pursuant to the fullu\\ing:
I . C'"onfiormance \\ilh applicable \\,itcr clu,llity-ba.SCd, tC'LI1J1C)I0'1\'-Lc vd, ,md toxic ur
prctrcatiucnt cllluent limilations a: hiuvidcd under 33 1 S ('. Sectlrwn 1311. 1312. 1+13.
1 316, and 1317 flVPCA Sections 101 . CI?. 106 and 307),
'• Conlurinance \\ith Ilic stale \\alel quality ';landalclS as pIMided for inChallier 173-201A
\VAC: atithoi iced by 33' U.S.C. 131 3 and by Chaptcr WAS P\CW. aild mth other
(ipprupriatc iccluirements uI slalc 1;Iw: and
fCoi11t1I"I11t1IICt \11111 lhi hlU\'I11011 111 tl,lllri ;111 I,J10V:11, ;i1;111.1111' and [l'd iilldblC 11l'(hhC1J to
prevcn1 and cowiol pollutioll of stile \\'ateis as ic(luiied by RC'1\' 91) 4;; 111{1
Pa e ' cj(
CONDITIONS Or ORDER 4 02SEANR-4379 AND XV.NI•L•'lt QU_\LI1•Y
CLIAt'I'IF'WATION: 0
111 N ic,i' of 111e Intl in ecoldance %%ilh 33 U.ti.C. 13,41 , 90.48.200 ItC\V .Intl Ch:II trl
173-201 % `%V \(', ualer quality certilic:Itirll iq `;Ial;t2d l0 11oCin_ I'Cdltr (`0:ror211n)l sul ied 11-1 ill
f of hnii,Illu colld!tionh:
A. No Impairment of NV—utcr Quatity:
AL. Certification of thiq proposal does not a III10rite Boning Realty Cutper.aion to exceei
applicable state \\atcr quality standards (Ch:lptcr 17 3-201 A WAC') or sedinlcut quality
standards (Chapter 17 3-_'04 WW). Water quality cl iteria contained in WAC 173-201 A-
030(1) and WAC 173-201 A-040 sliall apply to this proicct, tlnlcss utbt:lll lse :luIIl0T;7ed b•;
Fcolopy. •I his larder does not autholi7e temporaty exceedances of.\ater quality :,tandart's
bcyond the limits establishcd ill %VAC 173-20I P.- 110(3). Iltrthctl;lolc, �;clllin� ill this
ccllilicatioll shall nb:zolve Boeing Realty ('orporation fionl liability for cimtantin;llirnard
-im subsequent cleanup of`urf ice graters or sediments nculrring its a reqult of project
construction or operatiuns.
Mill (_'leek hciq been identified oil the 1998 303(d) I1S1 as c\cceditlL, st.lte :il,aterquallty
,tandar1 lur dIS'Alh•rd \Y"ell, lta,.11 COI futln, and tC111I)1,11 Ili e. I hiS 1l1iyu1'ed pl0iclt
•,hull n� t rc:nit in funhzr e�c:ctlanccq t�ftLL•;z :.t:nit'.:a,l ..
Project 11itifw:llion:
ill . Impactq to aquatic resources shall be mitieatcd tluough measures described in the
1*611ul\ine ductiments, except its modified by this Oldcr.
• Wclland N41tigation Plan (Revised) ?ricitic Gatcway liuginecs Pnrk. prepared by
Chad Annour, dated August 2002.
• Respome letter from Chad :armour, dated August 15, 2002.
• lh'cllAod Mitigation Planting plan, Sheetti W1.2 and W1.3, prep--red by fl:ughau,en,
dated rciii:�iuns July 22. 2002.
• Final (Marina For \ etland Plitioatiun. Sheet 1, prep;red by Bar�eduuxn. dated
rC\•tS1UtIS JIIIy 23, 2002.
B2, "AS-13u111" Pa:port: ,fin "as-built'' rcpullducurllcnlin- tllc rural dcaiuurf 111e luili`_:itikill
project area shall be ptepmed «hen site C011MrllC6011 and plantine is complUcd. fhe Ic'1-111;1
shall inchtdethe fctllult,ine:
• Vicinity 111,111 showill" •.Ite access;
• Final rite tilplptaplll .
• Dr wing that :;h<ill cic,1lly idcntil•y the boundatres ul the nutlo,dlon ,nc*
• The installed Plantlnu scheme sllotltitlo qualltitics, .1cilsitics, -nd
41,I'Ict\Inl.11e loc.,1110l; of plant-, as xl'cll as phil sty', run xui ,11C tillw of
ruse 3 of1)
• III o-u-graphs of the aien tal.cn from licnnancm reference point':
• Luc.11ions of photc`pointc, sampling end Illonitoling Sites.
• An on,dy'sis of.my tI m,_�is tv the mtligation pl a that occurred dot in-,
construction.
A copy oftbc "as-built" iepmI cil III he nCtlt In DCparuuCnt (If LCCIIiIL)'. I:CJuel Yurll.t
Coridinnior.i 191 164'tt.\tcn:ic SF. IhIIct uC. �:V*A, ;n 60 da\,;of
comp Icling construction and initial planting. mid in no t.lse Imci dun Duct mbcr 3 1,_V(U.
Deed Restritlion: Permanent protet Lion of tht: ;ref!.nd nii-.wition :md lvc%r\alion.l!: ;.
as deicntied In Welland \1m-,niinn I'lan ll:ctit�cdl Nufic Gatc;•.» Ousm is I'.:rl..
prepared by Chad Armour. dated Aueu't 2002. chill be Iecoided on the nppropi I,ac
proptrty dyed. I IIC deed _h,lI 'kitIN, indictdC that the ,ud.ind miIipatiun .areas ate 'u iris
Of the state." Documentatioa that this requirement has been fulfilled. includIn-, coplc<<d
permanent restrictitc casements, shall be prut Wed to L'coloe)'s 1'cdcrel Permit
Cootdinatur at the same time as the "as-hudt 1 report
Field super.ision• t he \tcIIaod miIi;,ativit fit,:thus tui\it) and pli ml ia_.t.illaIioitskill h
tit-Id-supen iced and in'pCtted b,. (hid Armour. I i C nr other qualified tonsultnnt(t)in
ensure prupu clev.itions .IrC.Ichlcted anJ proper plaurnmi.of plants
Monnorins • Monitorinc OiAl be conJutlCLI as idcl;t!fiCd in WCII.nd Milicatil`n 11:1
WC;I'M I'.Icitic Ciatclt'av liucinccq Palk. pitpmcd by ( had atmour. Jalyd '1u_usl'ntn
Copies of all monitoring report% •.hell be cuhmitted to Pcnlne) al 1190 — 1 OP, A"enu,:SL.
I Icllet•ue, WA `4 008-5453. es well .Is lit the Li S. .lnay Corps of L.n, iIICU%. I I IhC rt`IIIR
ul the mumlorin, Indic.ue that comill^_;ntt• MC.ISUIts.Ill•n;CdCd. Ills Ill-1-1111`I
slmll include adetaileddeccription of'atuonc Liken to iecufydeficienciec If Ole resahsof
the innnitorine at Year 10 shwa that the mitigation area does not ,atisfy the perfemiance
standards scl fcath nt the mitigation plan,.id( iliunal munourin-, and miti,,,dion way be
icgimcd (e g, replanting,still amendment', cclCttion of allcmatitC 'peck', rc-0.11U.lnnn
uhthc f`Crftln1I.111t,C S1JIId.uds. sic 1 .any additional namltonng or luititauen measures arc
tiuhittl to rctlels and app:otal of the r)epartment of pcolo:!y.
I.II IIICI I.1 FICC. hhe applicant Is iccponcihlc for maiuicimmu of the t.ct!enJ mitt;,.ltit-n !IL,
arch that the required perfcnmance standaide ate nlcl.
Accc�,s. Boeing Really C'cnpoimion'hall pro.idc access to the Imli;_alien slit upun tollikM
by I=cology peI'onnel for site inspetllon`,, monitoling.and nCce•.cart (1113 cullcciinll to
eustirc thot the wetland miUl alai is nnhlemrntrd ,ls appll,l cd
13i`undnry Ki-Ilkine' I"Ic Itount!ary of talc w.11mid noliplion Elie ,hall be p:nn ni i:ih
m:nl.cd ,tnh MACS cpaud .lpprusim.itrh' 100I'CLI np.ul Hie maikinp chill mcliid,
IWOC 111,11 tk:arly ulcht.11cs I11,11 cic.rlin;; w-c6nion mid 1'Crtlliitilpestiude .Ihphc.nu'm
nie pinhlhiled v.IIhIn the nitligntical area anJ th.tt no matcn,ll nxludrtl;,I'M!c .nhl l tctl IUIrt.
'hall he Jumped `Aithin dtc WtdaIId nuti,,alion area.
11;g1W 19, '002
PU,{ e ) of t
( '. Comtruction:
t:l _ Cumttuction St imwatet and rro',ion Control:
'I. �l'c�1k in or near \raters of the crate hall he done son- td mininliie t'uhidlly,
erosion, and other watcr quality impacts. ConStrUCtiorl !Aor111\ Acr, �.cJllllullt ,•Ihi
crCl_.ilril c1:I iol best M111aLCillent Practices suitable To 1)rC\'Gilt i`:CicJ.1111'CJ ul �Idl.'
\\titer quality siandards (L!, , ha%. bales, dctcntitm areas, filter 101LO, Ctc.), 5!1:1!1 1-•-
ilt place 11e1brc 5tilttin>; LIcarinr, lilhni, and gradim-, \\u1l at the 1211),10 ,ilea. a'nl
shall also comply \\ith all requirements of the NMES Permits.
b. Ptior to cle-minQ and Grading in wetlands. the adjacent \yctlandu \lt,tll t,e I•tutcacd
fioni construction impacts. Construction fencing or flagging (using I`liehlly
culored tale at no ICCS thin menty-li\c idol (25') iulci vats) of lh r\i�lin.,
•.:etlands and stream channels to be protected shall he completed prior to cleanr,-1.
All project staffshall be trained to recognize COnStrMliorl Icncilr"Ior llaiging Ill,tt
idcntifies \retland boundaries. Hquil`ment shall not he moved imo of operated in
\\etlands or stream channels that :ire 1101. authrriced to be tilled
(_'2. 1)m ing c1Caiing, and Filling 2 0,.e prtllcct iltC�, the appl!=am 1i ill !aki ;!)
IlleaCures to I1111 imiZC the :111C1,1!IUtl Or di�_AiuhanCC dnd 1'111.11i1
C All construL11011. (lobe is shall he properly di-_poised of on land -o that it cannel cnicr ,1
�+❑lerwiv or cause water quality degradation to ante \.atere.
C4_ Wash \\alcr cont,iiuing oils, >aenw. or idiot hai_.lrduus 111.11ci ials rccultin; iicin \r,wh (form
ofequipnient or \yoiking areas shall he contained for proper disposal. and shill not he
discharged into state waters ur sWrlll drains.
13ocina Really Curporation shall pro\ide notice to Lculo%'s Alice KLII)• at bast 3 d,1)s
prior to the ~tart of placing till in wetlands or oilier \yate►s of the sine Noll icadon 1,111
take place by e-mail to \y,l }y \'! , t_l_hLan' !u ( I__) G 19-71 1;. i,1•% to
(425) ray 098. or in \\!ding.
( •li. Clean Fill Ciiteria: nocing Realty Corporation shall ensure that fill Iflar_cd lilr the
hrOI)o!.eJ project does nut Contain share malcrials in luxic .1mounts.
U. }'mcr�cnc�•:Cnntin;;crcy �It.•a�t:res:
In the event Boeing Really Corporation Is unable to comply \•ith any of the pclnlll 1�
.tnd curdilions due Call'e, th. :t1`plic u1l �n:1 I
• 1111:nclll.ltl'ly lake actilln IO ~top. cont0111. :i1lJ Clcall up un^:ithori761 �1i,�h.ul:rs ul
other\\\ise stole the violation and currCLt the pluhlcnl.
hte,P�t 19. ?OW
• notilj E-cokwv Of the CaItitle toct%n,ply. ti III lt c\Cnte �h.tll be IepoItcdItIIIIlcdl,tlel\ to
Ecolny's 2a-1lour Spill P.cspcme 1 eaill :t (125) 649-7000, and \\ithin24 Lours to
Fculurv's Alice Kelly at (425) 649-7145.
`;uhai!ta detailed written report to I coloLy \\ithin five days that de!.cnl-eatL•e ramie r•f
the \iolation, culrcctil•e ,lction t.ikrn .tlld:r 1 planned. %icps to he taken t l l,Ie\cnt a
recurrence. Iesults of any samples to k-cil, and any other Item rent infili milliln
Compliance with this Colidltill;l ci,ic% nut lelic\e the nl,phcant horn re-,ponsibihiv to
nhiintain continuous Collipli:lice a ith [lie terms and conditions of this Order or the
resulting liability limn failure• to comply.
I)2. fuel hoses, oil drunis, oil or fuel Iransfcr \•,:I\es and fittings, ctc , shall be checked
regularly for drips or leaks, and shall he nlaintaincd and ;toted propel ly to hre\cnt �pllls
into "fate\,atcls. No refueling of equipment shall occur o\er, or I.\ithin 50 feet of creek.
or \wetlands.
I:. Of erPermits and Appi-mals:
• SEPA DeterI11ination oC];urrsitinilicimi: issu,d by the City A Kc•ra.
`cptcnibcr 21. 191;0.
I lvdra.11ic Ploiccl Al,pl„v.d 01112\1 I J,,_ ho Ili►-)1'%`!-U_' I miLd (IIIM i! )7. 'ht}2
• 1�f DES Gcncril Pcimtts `: S03-003W2.% .Ind S03-00442.t.
F. general CnnditiI)n,;:
VI . For putposcs of this Older, the term ` Al plicant• shall mean Boeing Realty Cnipoi ration
and its agents, assigns. and. contractors.
F2. I'his certification does not exempt and is provisional upon compliance \\ilh other statutes
and codes administered by federal, slate. and local iiwicics.
1: "I-Ile applicant \wtil be out (Ife(.1nluliance \\lip Ibis c•e•tt11K-1ilc 1 If t!le I'lv;;Ll ;s Lua_•t;;;sled
alid.'or oper,itcd in a manner not consistent \\•iIh the lit oleet deticI Ipiinn eoill,uned IIi tile
1)Ll1)]ic Not Ice for certification, or as othei`.ice appio\•ed h} ecology. ,1dd1nonaI
Ill itieation measures may be rctluired through Olhcr 10e•I1. staIC. Or Icdcralnqu;rcr III:llIS.
1:4. '1 he allplieam xill he out of compliance \with this codification and must real,hly \\ilh an
updated application if live \ears e'hllri: het\\CC11 IIIC dil!C ell !hc I`.`.ILliIeC UI t!li.,
cclrtil ication and the heeinning of cnntilruction and2or disch;11`2e for \\hich the fedeial
license or permit is bcin" sou"ht.
1-=. Tile applicant will be Out of Wrllpli;mcC \\•i[h this ccin icLition and must te.11,ph• \:it!t an
updated Ipplicati0J1 il'thc infoimahnn contained in the Public Notice is rnulrll Ii�
suhseduent submi it.
lti to the I'edetal All' futwc action A thi; piolccl location,
I o,
enl:rgency or otl:cl•.:isr, that is not dd-Mcd in the Public notice. orhas not been : ;t
by Ecology, is not autho►ized by Ihia Order. All future actions sliall be contditl, toil►
('cology for approval pi iur to implementation of Such a Ltion.
1:6. Copies of this Order _hall be }.cl,t ut► the jub silo and re;dily aL•ailable 1Vr rclrIellce h)
Ecology per-;n nel, the constructirm superintendent. cons,rilctikill nlnnaeeic and ft,tcmcn,
and state and local government inspectors. To avoid yiolauens or nun-compliance with
this OrJcr, the trpplicant shall cwme that project manaq.,crs, comtruclion►iiPelinlcndtuts
and other responsible parties have read and understand reletiant aspects of this (Wer,the
NPDES permits,and any subsequent revision or Ecology-approved plane
1.7. '1 he applicant shall provide access to the project site and all mitiaalinn cites upon leyuc.t
by Ecology personnel for site inspections, monituring, necessary data collection, ter to
ensure that conditions of this Or&r are heinrz met.
FS. Nothing in this Ordermyaiyes Ecology's anthonty to issue riMitloll.^.l oidcis if Fcology
determines further actions are necessary to implement the \Niter quality ldi%s of the state.
Further. Ecology retains continuing jurisdiction to make lnodific:,tnah hereto through
supplenlcntat order, if additional impacts due In project construction or ol)em ion are
identified (e.g., violations of %cater quality st_ndards, dmv.m.tream croNio;l, etc.), of if
Aditiunal cunditions arc ncccssaly to limper protect the public intcrc,,t.
F9. Liability: Any person Vyho fails to comply with any pnoN ision of this(trJrr ,hall he liabl
fora penalty uf•up lu Icn lhnus,u'd d011111-s ($1 U,000) her N.iol.turm fM exii day of
continuing noncompliance.
,Appeal 1'rocess:
Any persun ag4,rie\ed by this Order may obinin review t lie rcef by 1p pea 1, wiI Ill I1 thirty (J0) day
of receipt of this Order, to the Washington Pollution Control ifearine5 Board. P.O. Box 4090+.
Olympia, WA 98504-0903. Concurrently, a copy of the appeal must be sent to the Departulua
Ecolmy, Shcrelands and Em ironmental Assimance I'int;rarn, P 0. Boy 4,600. Olympia. 'N A
99504-7600. These p►occdures are wnsismit %\itlit he piuvisiuns ul t•hoptcr d', 2113 RC%V,md
the rules and regulations adopted thereunder.
Dated �� �`> fC i_ at Belle%ue. Wa�hnlgioll.
Jeannie Sununelhays. Scctlun 1`lauagcr
Sho:elands mid i-mutmn, mal ,'lswtance
Department of Ecology
Statc rf Wa.;hin1.tun
:-:I;fSITj}
0
' ss sY-
1 MIS -Zj
1 1 LLJ 1 1 1 . 1 ! r
United States Army Corps of Engineers
AXj L 3 KIP
A permit to FILL_'.19 ACRES OF',\*ETLANDS ON A 240-ACRE SITE FOR THE CO\STRLCTIO\OF.\
BUSINESS PARK cm DEVELOP AND ENSURE AN FCnNn\1ICAL1•Y 1'1 ARI E Ri]C NKS PARK THAT
MEE 19 TI IE EXISTING MARKET DENW\1D) IN WETLANDS ADIWENT TO THE GREEN RIVER O114'll1L
BOEING SPICE CF.\ FER PROPFRlY
has been issued to MENGRUL1t' CORPORATION on
Address of P e r m i tt e a POST OFFICE BO\ SE M LE,WASHINGTO` 9M 24-"_'k1;
Permit Number
20004-01279 I \LPH Il. GRA\'PY
COLONEL,CORPS 01: E\GI\EERS
t)IS-[RIC r COMMANDER
EI.v FCr.1.1-03 �, �,d dt 1ER 11.i•2 3^3) EDIT�V CF J L �'.irY:c L'£ED c�' L NEN-CW I
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT
Permittee Boeing Redly Corporation Boeing Reilly Corporation
Post Office Box 3107. 6iC 212.79
Permit No' 2000-4-01279 Seattle, Washineton 93124-2207
Issuing Office: Sealt!e Dislnct
NOTE: The term "you"and its derivatives, as used in :firs permA. means the perm,llce or any future iransfcrr e
The ten n'lh:s off ire" refers to the- apple;r.a!e cr dr.ision office cf the US :nuy Corps of Engineers(Corp
having jurisdiction over the permuted activity or the 2pprepna!e otfiaal of that office act,ro under the authority of II
commanding officer.
You are authorized to perform work in accordance with the terms and conditions specified below.
Project Description: Place fill in 2.19 acres of Wetlands on a 240-ocre site for the construction of a business par
(Pacific Gateway Business Park) in accordance with the plans and dra•,:rays attached herelo which are incorperal
in and made a part of this permit (to develop and ensure an ecorcmrcal!y v.able business park that meets the
exrs:rng market demand for large distribution warehouses, data center, and mrnufacturing fau,rbes COrl' ale
the adjacent Space Center facilities). The amount of vretlands to be filled for road cromrrs is 0 49 of an acre
Buildings and parking lots will cover 1 7 acres of wetlands. Aug additional 0 12 of an acre of wetlands would be
incorporated into a 3-acre stormwaler detention pond. Total wetland impact area is 2 31 acres Boeing Realty
Corporation will also create another 15-2cre detention facility in uplands on the protect site.
Project Location: In r,etlands adjacent to Ilre Green Rv.er u-%the Boeing Space Center pi(iptoy at
Kent, Washrng!on.
Permit Conditions.
Generaf Conditions
2035
1. The time limit for completing the work authorized ends on 11JG 3 If you find that you rn
more time to complete the authorized activity, submit your request for a time extension to this office for
consideration at least 1 month before the above date is reached.
2. You must maintain the activity authorized by this permit in good condition and in accordance m h the
terms and concrtrons of this permit. You are not relieved of this requirement if you abandon the permitted acUvrty
although you may make a good faith transfer to a third party in compliance with General Condition 4 below. Shot
you wish to cease to maintain the authorized activity or should you desue to abandon hvilhout a good fa:th trans'
you must obtain a modification to this permit from this office, which may require resforalion of the area
3. If you discover any previously unknown hrslonc or archeological remains vehde accornptisl ping the actr%
authorized by this permit, you must immediately notify this office of vvhal you have round V,'e voil initiate the fed
and State coordination required to determine if'the remains warrant a recovery effort or,f the site is eligible for;is
in the National Register of Historic Places
d. If you sell the property associdled Willi this permit,you must obtain the suoneture of the near o::ner u)t
space provided and fonaard a copy of the permit to Ihrs office to validate the transfer of this authrinzehon.
5. If a conditioned water quality certification has been issued for your project, you must comply with the
conditions speofred in the certification as special conditions to this permit For your convenience,a copy of the
certification is a!tached it ;t contains such conditions.
BOEING REALTY CORPORATION 2000-4-0127
u. You must c!:c v rcprescntztivcs from this office to Irspect the oull-0rrzed aG,:v:tyzI vy t,in.e die,i
necessary to ensure that it ,s being or has been accomplished in a ccor dance vv th the 1er nrs end cendrtror, ur
Perrti,t.
After a detailed and rare' review of SI the concit•ens contained n this permit.the permtttce
sick nov,lerl(- Ih il, a!though said cordrtions �.vere required by the Corps, nonetheless the poinitee agreed to ti-c,
conditions voluntarily to facilitate issuance of the permit; the permltlee will comply fully•. dhallthe terms 0f III the
permit conditions.
SI)ecia/ Conddrons:
a. The Welland Mitigation Plan (Revised)Pacific Ga.e.vay Business Park, Kent, ll'ashington datedFugur
2002 must be implemented. Mitigation monitoring reports %%ill be due in years 1, 2, 3, 5, 7,and 10 atler the Corps'
written acceptance of the as-built drawings All t eports must be submitted to U S Army Corps of Engineers,
Seattle District, Regulatory Branch and must prominently display the reference number 2000-4.01279.
b. A status report on the mitigation construction, including as-built drawings, must be subnmlted to the U
Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District, Regulatory Branch. 13 months from the dale of permit Issuance. Alms,
status reports on mitigation construction are required unt.l m licatron construction is complete
C. The wetland area created, restored and cnhr need Zs mitigation for work ou:howcd by this perm.t, she
not Ce made the subject of a future individual or general Department of the Army permil app hcalion for fill or o:IFer
de-velcpmer'it, except for the purposes of enharcing or restoring the mitigation associated wd) this p,olecl. In
addition, a description of the mitigation area Identified in the final n-rtr5ation plan os 2pp10•.ed,and any suh cc,
herrrld mitigation area revisions, will be recorded wth the Reg-slrar of Deeds or other 2ppropriale official d
with the responsibility for maintaining records to or interest in real property. Proof of tilts ducurrentation rnus be
provided to the Corps of Engineers, Seattle District within 60 days cf the issuance of this permit
d You must implement the ESA requirements and/or agreements set forh in the Biological Evaluation
Pocdic Gateway Business Park. Kent, Washington.dated August 2000, and the addendum dated August 2001.to
their entirety. The US. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) concurred with a finding of "(nay diect, not likely to
adversely affect" based on this document on June 4, 2001 (USFWS Reference Number 1-3-02-I-0780) The
National Marine Fisheries Service(Nh1FS) concurred with a finding of "may affecd, not likely to adversely affect"
based on this document on April 15. 2002 (NIAFS Reference Number VVH13-02-055). Both acenctes will be
informed of this permit issuance and will enforce any known violations of the commitments made in this docurnen
pursuant to the ESA.
C. You mus, pro-.ide a copy of the permit trcnsmittoi letter, the permit form, and dravrngs to all contractor
performing any of the authorized work.
Further Information'
1 . Congressional Authorities. You have been authorized to undertake the activity GesakeJ above pursuant
( ) Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbor Act of 1 UU9 (33 U S.C. 403).
(X) Section 404 of the C!ean kAlater Act (33 U S C. 1344).
O Section 103 of the IManne Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972 (33 U S C 1413).
120EING PEA LTYCORPORATIOW 20034 012i
Limits cf this au?hori=ion
T1-os I;eni;G does rwl u!nidle ll•e nejd to obtn-n orhr-r Federal, State, or local aumonza'.1ull lVqu1;td by
ia.v
b This peimd does not grant any prop city lights or exclusive privileges.
c This permit does rot author.,---- 2r; ,njUry to the property or rights of othurs.
d. This pemit does not authonce interference wth any oxisting or proposed Federal project.
3. Limits of Federal Liability. In issuing this permit, the Federal Government(ices not assume any h2bility for I�
fol!ov.ing.
a Damaces to the permitted project or uses thereof as a result of other permitted Sclyd.ies or from n,lur,
caUscs.
b Dania(jes to the permitted project or uses thereof as a result of current or fuluie Wivilles underlat en t
or on behalf of the United States in the public interest.
c Damages to persons, propel Ice. or 'o ether permitted or unpermrted nctiv-hes or s!ructurc; caused by
zeulhurr-ed by this perwil.
c DeSrgn cr co'Istr-Jct,cn dcf-c;rnc cs o_ecc,.tcd ;rth the per—ttcj
10
e Damage claims associated v.nh zny future modification, suspension, or revocalion of Lus permit
3. Reliance on Applicant's Data The determination of this office that issuance of this permit is net contrcry to
public interest was made in rcknce on the information you provided.
S. Reev.-luation of Permit Decision. This office may reevaluate its decision on this permit at cry time the
circumstances warrant Circumstances that could require include, but ore net limited lo,lhe follov,ing.
a. You fad to comply;•,•ith the terms and conditions of the permit
b. The information provided by you in support of your.-pplication pro-.es to hovel:ecn false, incompicle
rr2ccurate (See 4 above).
C. Significant new information surfaces v.hich this office did not consider n reaching the orgiral public
:rtr_•rest occasion
Such a reevaluation may result in a determination that it is Zppropnate to use the suspension, modification,end
revocation procedures contained in 33 CFR 325.7 or enforcement procedures such as those conloined in 33 CF
326.4 and 326 5 The referenced enforcement procedures provide for the issuance of an administrative order
i ecjuiring you to comply with the terms and conditions of your peimit end fur the nul-allonuf It--gdl aL111011 Whp-le
appropriate. You call be required to pay for any correLtive measures orcered by this olfice, and if you fail to corn
•.vith such directive, this office may in certain situations (such as those specified in 33 CFR 209 170)accomplish
COI r CCtive mCaSures by contract or otherwise and bill you for the cost
N C O U L
r In
L I_ > 1
CD
J
0 O a
_> ; O a) r_{ I ^ U C
y Ll O o
• O N ~ {- Q C
CJ Q
UZ3 to = 0
U O 41 O w
r 0
O _ ..
c 3 0 0 � E j • `� � y `
U r i O L 0 0
>
\ �I [
CL O .j O 3 C
E a� cv o .�•` y 0 ra
U E > O O y 0 C
t L7 C O
U U
� L L
ra @ r 3
C 0
E 74
r — C o
y n [
U `J = U 7 D - n
E U CZ C_ U
16 O
C) ° L Q) 0
y _ ' c� =
_0 L C j
N C CJ V �, [
U En •O U_ r 0 �
r 'U to _0 -0 U C)
o *Z3 Z C N 3 u
0 0
-0
N -- U O
1— ` E 0
c � alai F- 3 ` moo
a L C N
CD .v E cn ( n = � M
U
U` L C►. E 30 �� y `J C7 o �' ra
y w w v C C
Q o o c� 1 U dy o u ay
LL N ti \� � v O C 0 ,0
C r o \\ J 9 . C �. O L �U
U jj �tDU to L E
n0CZ L -a
C
- / , Z
y ) O Op a
y c
? H [r 05 � =
i
i
I U 1 I
I S i'QM SL
NOT 10 SCALE /
T I
S 190:h Si 1
O � I
O}i I
LOT(MITIGATION
S 1S41h cT
i r/S
I I .
/ -- S_-61h—S?------ I I 1
J I
1 V.
r ----- 1, PACIFIC �}
! 1------: GATEWAY
I BUSINESS I S 2^2-d ST
PARK
I
I
I
I
c 1
J 1 � S tkdi;h ST
1
I � �
I I x
1 y < N
1 I
1 v C <
----- S 212th S\I
FIGURE 1:VICINITY MAP Aeferture: :OOO-0-1i,19
Purpose: Optunvs Bocuy{Feahucs Appllcndoo by: Do nl;Ral•y Cc-,o'eton
and Y.educe Surplu Nccr. M111 Crest ie: Cry of I;em
RaJ Estate D.luiu: NGVD:929• Couut): King State: A'A I
Proposod: Business Pain: Adjs"ut Property Owncn et: S a=t..es: `bye.: 1 or? Bale'JI Aud 2(!j
DATE: 12/ro/Do 11 1•0+,
Dr waw(- Q\i.epcl\Clwa\e�+,a•`+r�.V\eeyw:,e.y
0
t �_
>o _
i"SIS-ZIZ'lJ.DS
Sm
cc
3.
l J • r _ _
h
Z' II. J
1IfIIIIt I i s i
vv
0.r '14 loo------�j
1 e
W �
i t j-4 P.r j � •
.O;
till;
n•a cr
-" -' J t-�aF�!Q
•� -tip a �^ gj,a C_.
l t
a
•e e�
I• �
Ic
V • S
v
�l e
�• t
o
U W! w ; • t
= i i
-� •F W
H
JIJ N
W
\v1 AND ff
Se-a in Feel
I
I .% YIETLAND fl I
F4��\'� j WETLAND ST
f' �Ap 1 — to remora
WETLAND F i
patd fill y-•I
- BOEING �
SPACE CENTER
(ezi3ting inj63triul dcvcbpnnt)
4 i
PAC!F!C GAI AY BUSHNESS PAnK
` J
_ e
ti
WETLAND M
WETLAND SSG 1
to be fillee to be caccwSed —
i
`•' � � ! WETLAND i I �—' \
x
1 I to be filled
WETLAND J I WETLAND 9 2*
to be fi, to I:e Itcaruted
ETLAND SW
- - •-- I to be filled
t o rcmctn
. i 7t71a /S T11[Lf
/•( DPANAM DI'N
t w'ert�a SS C 2- rr•f rtCal�ct-�' F, fo •r Sk'AN.'C
FIGURE 3: JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS Referroce: 20CA-0-1:19
Purpose: Ophtnim Boeing Facilities AppUutloe by: Boeing ReehyCerr ion
a-A Reduce&nplu ,,ear: Mill Crick la: City of K"
Real Geste Datum: NGVD 19,29 County: YWt 9111e:Wt.
Propvsed: Btum0s Prk Adjacent Proptrty 0%nen: See aCachmmt Sheet: ^yof8 Dmit.31 Ault=000
/ I'<r..d:1:! L
DMG AAA.G G\�rilect\�.w:e\o+nv.s\poel�i\taJaaD7dq
' 1
I - c _� Urn,
'
gd 9
ILI Ilk.
IS
a =
7T}.yg.77yy .�.�jj �gi vyyy yy)) ro
r a p
IL vy
0 LD X L ,
Wfliff
¢, UJ .�.,
Q S
a
• y YaAKill i 7• `e�ij yBEi
• P
aaaA .
.�. 9a >�
�44
3
� Q
u
=� to p d <
Z Z
,?r v Gis+OO10 r, �E
p • W '
i J /
e
E s 3
1r• - ' c 6o
as = 32 V
z °f
61 s
I V J N W G l� �F.� • Q
s
- --- - • c a = i s a �3
133b1S ONZ6L 'S
0 �o ` IL
� .Y
o•
_ i
i
x
w
U
J
_J
22 FT
22 FT
11 FT 13 5 FT 13 FT
414.4 1 L ,
EAST WEST
A A'
0 60 120
Approximate Scale In Feet
c+
r
0
n
C
c
c
u
a
w
FIGURE 5: CONCEPTUAL MITIGATION kikrcncc: 00.0-I:ill
CROSS SECTION - LOT 4 Application b): Y,ung It.,ln l umnon
Purpo.c: OPtimirc 110cmg I3u Ill tcs aid Rcdu-e SLrPlu; Nc.tr: Mill(rc:A In: Cnl rf F:rrt
Collin": kill; tr. '.l1
kc31 E5:ate Ihtum: NGVD 1029
I'r,+,rKe,p IS', ^clv 1'---L Adiaccnt 1'm;tirtr U%rcn: l- `— Mhcct:
i ------------
L 7
Cq
Li
CO
=tin 10l G3SC---
` U� z t z
= - "c,- J 'I QW
CV W '� W
LU
LL
0� Q
>C 0 3
z 3
3
N
•'1 •ram � ^. �,% < �' 0 CV W t7 x
to r4
• i �O � !' .i N N N �
••\ .' r J
•\ W S
hL r
4 CID*
Vni _J7- a «t7
t Con
a
Ll
17
p
r a I ttETLtvp
Y I^
DE Aa
• I s I" I� t I1 !
G o CEt%TEkLP:E CF POtt i I
4. I I
i (�1 CEh7ERL1!:E OF Kk) i
I I t
z C
�S_ `t/1•
C 3 N Nrn N '
U CAS I
ram^ vvn U
LA i
N N
C m as c� rn v. c, c+ a
G V rJ Co O ^I ^
U n N N U I
=T
z SOUTH19')`h place SECTION 'A'
^ —- "
SCF^� ^^l,-l�' 1'c S �'_' P7
�VI
Co o
t
CD m fSFF,1T-� F IasLi
n Z FA1EuE!.T CPq^; ^
25 I - " 25
0 m Z SIOE S!0?E
0 I
z �
-
1
D
Z n 2 I20
Co p
D Co o. m ---- ------�— _
0 — {IST4i �E
D N oI SECTION 'a'
o 0
0 15
m Z
I
Z A 3 SOUTH 199`It Place SECTION 'B'
Table I - N%ctland arras on the Pjanc Ga,cMat nuanass Park„tc
R•etland Acres Classirication Function ,I'ositiun _ --
k3 Palustnne ttncrrcnt I rA ,o t.1c:Dt.rt IDra'na.e d,!L)
060 lHui,rineererren; Lo-a 1Shel:uw t!eFres_n•n
•Palusr,,neerr.er:n: Loa Me
024 Palus-;re emergent _ Low jsµalc
�I 0?3 I'alusrtrecmersent Lew c_!,a;,ew•d:prs:en
t 0 01 t'alus me emergent Low h,nsualc
EM 0.'1 JPalusmne cmcr_c.., Lcu- �hzlloa drpresc,nn
SSCt 0 t? Pa'ustr,ne c-xrc:nt Lcu 6xsNa'e
SSC24 104 ?alustrtne a:,:rgctn and Lo% to MeJ-wn (Dcmnc.,;ar
scrubaF.:b
ST Oil I'alusaine emergent Low cha11ow &Ftession
S\� 019 Palastrre tire.gcnt Low sh,l,sy.dcprrs,cn
Subtotal 6
t 1, 1f!,:rj SK Z rs:r rtIal:Or.1 E� (crp5 Cc.' S.J.:KCC
I
aIt
l
r%d v — t.•phm,:a mce,ng NAME Bce ng Recl:y Cora I PRO=OSED 3ts nt:ss Pa,k
Fa:,'ities 2000-4.01273
IN :^,'etl�,nds re:u'.f,ll Gt•ek
DAILIM NGVD !92J AT Kcn•
COUNTY <,na STATE WA
SHEET 6 OF 8
7 REVISE% 10 Ark dLt
Kent City Council Meeting
Date September 2. 2003
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: STATE GRANT FOR COMMUTE TRIP REDUCTION
PROGRAM—AUTHORIZE
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works Committee,
authorization for the Mayor to sign the Commute Trip Reduction Implementation Grant
Agreement,upon concurrence of the language therein by the City Attorney.
3. EXHIBITS: Public Works Director memorandum and CTR Implementation
Agreement
• 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 6F
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Don E. Wlckstrom, P E Public Works Director
• Phone 253-856-5500
KEN T Fax 253-856-6500
W A S H I N G T O N Address, 220 Fourth Avenue S
Kent,WA.98032-5895
DATE: Au 1so
t 18,2003
TO: D4, hite and Kent City Council
FROM: Donkstrom, Public Works Director
SUBJECT: State Grant for Commute Trip Reduction Program
MOTION:
Recommend authorizing the Mayor to sign the Commute Trip Reduction
Implementation Grant Agreement,WSDOT Agreement#GCA3655, upon concurrence
of the language therein by the City Attorney and the Public Works Director.
SUMMARY:
Commute Trip Reduction Implementation Agreement between the City of Kent and the
Washington State Department of Transportation for the implementation of RCW 70.94.521, the
Commute Trip Reduction Law. The Agreement consists of terms and conditions for
reimbursement from the State for costs incurred by the City for implementing the requirements
of the State law
BUDGET IMPACT: No Unbudgeted Fiscal/Personnel Impact
BACKGROUND:
The City is required by state law to enforce the regulations specified in RCW 70.94.521. The
City is then reimbursed by the State for costs incurred based on a formula devised by the State
Dept of Transportation, Rail and Public Transit Section. Although this is a two-year agreement,
the amount of the reimbursement is determined on an annual basis. The current year(July 2003-
June 2004) funding for the City of Kent is identified as $54,647. This is a reduction of
$16,816.17 from last year's state allocation. The reason for the reduction is that the State DOT
changed the formula they use to distribute the funds as allocated by the State Legislature.
Although they received the exact same amount of funding from the Legislature, they have
divided that pie among a much larger pool of participants They have added a new county,
Benton County, which will receive the Minimum County Allocation of$80,000 right off the top.
Plus, within King County the share of the pie is divided into smaller pieces because of the
addition of the cities of Snoqualmie and North Bend. Plus, the State will no longer fund services
devoted to "Voluntary" worksites which reduced the City of Kent's per-worksite funding by 6
employers.
Mayor White and kent City Council Commute Trip Reduction Implementation Agreement-Authorize
August 18,2003
1
Washington State City of Kent
Department of Transportation 220 Fourth Ave South
310 Maple Park Avenue Kent,WA 98032-5895
PO Box 47387
Olympia,WA 98504-7387
Key Contact Person: Cathy Mooney
Key Contact Person: T.J.Johnson Employer Federal 1D #: 91-6001254
Agreement Start Date Completion Project Amount Project Title
Number Date
Commute Trip Reduction
CCA3655 Jul 1, 2003 June 30,)005 $54,647 lImplementation
This Agreement is made and entered into this Ist day of July, 2003, between the Washington
State Department of Transportation, acting by and through its Secretary of Transportation,
(hereinafter called "WSDOT") and C ity o f Kent(hereinafter referred to as"Contractor") and
said parties WITNESS THAT:
WHEREAS, RCW 70.94.521 through 70.94.551 requires cities, counties and to%�ns containing
"major employers," in counties %%ith populations over 150,000, to develop ordinances,plans and
programs to reduce Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) and Single Occupant Vehicle (SOV)
commute trips, and thereby reduce vehicle-related air pollution, traffic congestion and energy
use;
WHEREAS, RCW 70.94.541 (2) provides for technical assistance to counties, cities, and towns
in developing and implementing Commute Trip Reduction (CTR)plans and programs;
WHEREAS, RCW 70.94.544 provides for distribution of funds for local CTR implementation
efforts;
WHEREAS, WSDOT desires to achieve trip reduction in order to improve the efficiency of the
state transportation system and the quality of life for citizens of the State of Washington;
WHEREAS, the Washington State Legislature's delay in approving continued funding for the
CTR program requires this contract to be effecti%e retroactive to July 1, 2003 to preserve
continuity of program funding.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of covenants, conditions, performances and promises
herein contained, the parties agree to the following terms and conditions:
Section 1
Purpose of Agreement
Tire purpose of this Agreement is for WSDOT to provide funding to the Contractor to be used
solely for activities undertaken to fulfill the requirements of RCW 70 94.521, et. seq,and to
implement tasks as described in Exhibit 11, Scope of Work. This Agreement consists of lire
terms and conditions, and Exhibits 1, 11 and 111, N%hich by this reference are incorporated herein.
i
Section 2
Scope of\Fork
The C ontractor a rid W SDOT w ill p erfomi all t heir d esignated t asks u rider t his A greenment a s�
described in Exhibit 11, Scope of\fork.
Section 3
Time for Beginning and Completion
The work to be performed under this Agreement shall commence July 1, 2003, and terminate on
June 30,2005, unless terminated sooner as provided herein.
Section 4
Reimbursement and Payment
WSDOT shall reimburse the Contractor for eligible expenditures not to exceed 554,647 during
the first fiscal year of the contract period. The maximum amount of funding for the Contractor
was deter lined using the methodology contained in Exhibit I, Funding .allocation
Methodology. WSDOT will reimburse the Contractor only for actual and eligible direct project
costs. Payment will be made on a reimbursable basis. Payment is subject to the submission to
and approval by WSDOT of properly prepared invoices accompanied by progress reports and
financial summaries. The Contractor shall submit an invoice (state form A-19) or WSDOT
approved invoice format to WSDOT in order to receive reimbursement. The Contractor shall
submit invoices up to 4 times per fiscal year, or up to eight times during the course of this
contract. The Contractor shall submit a final invoice to WSDOT no later than July 15, 2005.
Any payment request received after July 15, 2005 or fifteen (15) days of the termination date,
v.hichever is applicable, -,Hill not be eligible for reimbursement. N'dithin thirty (30) days after
receiving the invoice and upon approval, WSDOT shall remit to the Contractor a %Narrant f
payment. All invoices and warrants shall be based on and paid on actual vkork performed a
actual costs incurred up to the maximum amount identified in this Agreement.
Section 5
Project Records
The Contractor agrees to establish and maintain for the project either a separate set of accounts
or accounts within the framework of an established accounting system, in order to sufficiently
and properly reflect all eligible direct and indirect project costs claimed to have been incurred in
the performance of this Agreement. Such accounts are referred to herein collectimely as the
"Project Account". All costs claimed against the Project Account must be supported by properly
executed payrolls, time records, invoices, contracts, and payment vouchers evidencing in proper
detail the nature and propriety of the charges.
Section 6
Progress Reports
The Contractor shall submit to WSDOT progress reports as described in Exhibit 11, Scope of
Work, so that WSDOT may adequately and accurately assess the progress nmade by the
Contractor and third parties to this Agreement in implementing RCW 70.94.521 et. seq. These
reports shall be submitted to WSDOT along with any request for reimbursement submitted
pursuant to Section 4, Reimbursement and Payment.
0
Page 2 CCA3655
Section 7
Audits, Inspections, and Records Retention
WSDOT, the State Auditor, and any of their representatives shall ha%e full access to and the
right to examine, during normal business hours and as often as they deem necessary, all of the
Contractor's records with respect to all matters covered by this Agreement. Such representatives
shall be pennitted to audit, examine and make excerpts or transcripts from such records, and to
make audits of all contracts, invoices, materials, payrolls, and other matters covered by this
Agreement. In order to facilitate any audits and inspections, the Contractor shall retain all
documents, papers, accounting records, and other materials pertaining to this Agreement for six
years from the date of completion of the project or the project final payment date. Hou ever, in
case of audit or litigation extending past that six years period, then the Contractor must retain all
records until the audit or litigation is completed. The Contractor shall he responsible to assure
that it, WSDOT, the State Auditor, and any of their representatives, retain comparable audit
ri ghts with respect to subcontractors to the Contractor within the scope of this Agreement.
Section 8
Agreement Modifications
I. Either party may request changes to this Agreement, including changes in the Scope of
Work. Such changes that are mutually agreed upon shall be incorporated as written
amendments to the Agreement. No variation or alteration of the terms of this Agreement
shall be valid unless made in writing and signed by authorized representatives of the parties
hereto.
2. Any additional funding secured by WSDOT beyond the amount identified in Section 4,
Reimbursement and Payment N\111 be allocated to the Contractor for the period July 1,
2004 to June 30, 2005 in accordance with the methodology described in Sections I and 2 of
Exhibit 1, Funding Allocation Methodology. If an increase in funding by the funding source
augments the Contractor's allocation of funding under this Agreement, the Contractor and
WSDOT agree to enter into an amendment to this Agreement providing for an appropriate
change in the Scope of Work and/or the project amount in order to reflect any such increase
in funding.
3. If a reduction of funding by the funding source reduces the Contractor's allocation of funding
under this Agreement, the Contractor and WSDOT agree to enter into an amendment to this
Agreement providing for an appropriate change in the Scope of Work andlor the project
amount in order to reflect any such reduction of funding.
Section 9
Recapture Pro%ision
In the event that the Contractor fails to expend state funds in accordance with state law and/or
the provisions of this Agreement, WSDOT reserves the right to recapture state funds in an
amount equivalent to the extent of noncompliance. Such right of recapture shall exist for a
period not to exceed three (3) years folloN%ing termination of the Agreement. Repa)Tnent by the
Contractor of state funds under this recapture provision shall occur within thirty (30) days of
demand.
Page 3 CCA3655
Section 10
Disputes
Any disputes bet«een WSDOT and the Contractor %%ith regard to this Agreement that are not
disposed of by the project administrators assigned to supervise this Agreement shall be referred
for determination to the Secretary of WSDOT, or his/her designee, as a condition precedent to
the commencement of any legal action, accept as necessary to avoid the preclusive effects of any
applicable contractual deadlines or statutes of limitation.
Section 11
Termination
WSDOT,at its sole discretion, may suspend or terminate this Agreement in whole,or in part, for
the foI)owing reasons:
1. The Contractor materially breaches, or fails to perfomi any of the requirements of,this
Agreement, and after fourteen (14) days,�%ritten notice,has failed to cure the conditions)
causing that breach;The Contractor materially breaches and, fails to remedy after
fourteen(14) days-written notice. Conditions of breach may include,but not be limited
to:
• Any action of the Contractor,which under the procedures of this Agreement would have
required the approval of WSDOT, taken%%ithout such WSDOT approval;
• Failure to perform in the manner called for in this Agreement; and
• Failure to comply with any provision of this Agreement.
2. The Contractor is prevented from proceeding wish the Project by reason of a temporary
preliminary, special,or pemtanent restraining order or injunction of a court of competent
jurisdiction ,%here the issuance of such order or injunction is primarily caused by the acts
or omissions of persons or agencies other than the Contractor;
3. The requisite state funding is reduced or becomes unavailable through failure of
appropriation or otherwise;
4. WSDOT determines that the continuation of the project would not produce beneficial
results commensurate with the further expenditure of funds;
5. WSDOT, at its sole discretion, determines to accept a request made in canting by the
Contractor to terminate the Agreement in whole or in part; or
6. WSDOT determines that suspension or termination is in the best interests of the state.
If this Agreement is terminated under subsections 2, 3, 4, 5, and/or 6 of this Section, then the
Contractor may be reimbursed only for actual and eligible direct expenses under this Agreement
incurred prior to the date of termination, and then only to the extent of appropriated funds. if this
Agreement is terminated under subsection i of this Section, then WSDOT shall not be obligated
to provide any additional reimbursement past the effective date of that termination and WSDOT
shall also retain all rights to seek recapture or damages from the Contractor. If an appropriate
judicial authority determines that the Agreement was improperly terminated under subsection I
of this Section, then the termination shall be deemed a tennination under subsection 6 of this
Section with all attendant rights and limitations.
Page 4 GCA3655
Section 12
Forbearance by NN'SDOT Not a Wai%er
Any forbearance by WSDOT in exercising any right or remedy hereunder, or othenvise afforded
by applicable law, shall not be a \%ai\er of or preclude the exercise of any such right or remedy.
Section 13
Waiver
In no event shall any WSDOT payrnent of grant funds to the Contractor constitute or be
construed as a waiver by WSDOT of any Contractor breach,or default \\hicli and shall in no\+ay
impair or prejudice any right or remedy available to WSDOT with respect to any breach or
default.
Section 14
Independent Contractor
The Contractor shall be deemed an independent Contractor for all purposes, and the employees
of the Contractor or any of its subcontractors and the employees thereof, shall not in any manner
be deemed to be employees of WSDOT.
Section 15
WSDOT Advice
The Contractor bears complete responsibility for the administration and success of the Project as
it is defined by this Agreement and any amendments thereto. Although the Contractor is allowed
to seek the advice of WSDOT on problems that may arise, the offering of WSDOT ad%ice shall
not shift the responsibility of tine Contractor for tine correct administration and success of the
Project, and IVSDOT shall not be held liable for offering advice to the Contractor
Section 16
Limitation of Liability and Indemnification
No liability shall be attached to WSDOT or the Contractor by reason of entering into this
Agreement except as expressly provided herein. This Agreement is not intended to benefit any
third party. The Contractor shall indemnify and hold WSDOT, its agents, employees, and/or
officers harmless from, and shall process and defend at its own expense, any and all claims,
demands, suits, penalties, losses, damages, or costs of whatsoever kind or nature (hereafter
"claims) brought against WSDOT arising out of or incident to the execution, performance or
failure to perforni ofor under this Agreement; provided, ho\\ever, that if such claims are caused
by or result from the concurrent negligence of(a) tine Contractor, its agents, employees, and/or
officers and (b) WSDOT, its agents, employees, and/or officers, this indemnity provision shall
be valid and enforceable only to the extent of the negligence of the Contractor, its agents,
employees, and/or officers; and provided further that nothing herein shall require the Contractor
to hold harmless or defend WSDOT, its agents, employees, and/or officers from any claims
arising from the sole negligence of WSD0T, its agents, employees, and/or officers.
Page 5 GCA3655
Section 17
Hold Harmless
It is understood and agreed that this Agreement is solely for the benefit of the panics hereto and
gives no right to any other party. No joint venture or partnership is fonned as a result of tills
Agreement. Each party hereto agrees to be responsible and assumes liability for its wall
negligent acts or omissions, or those of its officers, agents or employees, and sees to salve,
indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the other party from such liability. Each contract for
service or activities utilizing funds provided in ►hole or part by this Agreement shall include a
provision that WSDOT and the State of Washington are not liable for damage or claims for
damages arising from any city, town,designee or subcontractors performance or acts ities under
the terms of those contracts.
Section 18
Governing Law,Venue, and Process
This Agreement shall be construed and enforced in accordance with, and the ►alidity and
performance thereof shall be governed by the la►vs of time State of Washington. In the event that
either party deers it necessary to institute legal action or proceedings to enforce any right or
obligation under this Agreement, the parties hereto agree that any such action shall be initiated in
the Superior Court of the State of Washington situated in Thurston County. The Contractor
hereby accepts service of process by registered mail consistent ►►ith RCW 4.28.OSO(1). Each
party shall bear its own legal costs and expenses, including attorney fees, in any such litigation.
Tile parties may bilaterally elect to submit their dispute to mediation or arbitration on such terms
as are agreed upon by the parties.
Section 19
Compliance »ith Lamis and Regulations
The Contractor agrees to abide by all applicable state and federal lams and regulations,
including, but not limited to, those concerning employment, equal opportunity emplo)mment,
nondiscrimination assurances, project record keeping necessary to evidence agreement
compliance, and retention of all such records. The Contractor will adhere to all of time
nondiscrimination provisions in Chapter 49.60 RCW. The Contractor will also comply with the
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), Public Law 101-336, »hick provides comprehensive
civil rights protection to individuals with disabilities in the areas of employMment public
accommodations, state and local government services and telecommunication.
Section 20
Section Headings
All section headings are inserted for convenience only and shall not affect any construction or
interpretation of this Agreement.
Section 21
Severability
If any covenant or provision of this Agreement shall be adjudged void, such adjudication shall
not affect the validity or obligation of performance of any other covenant or pro%ision, or part
thereof, that in itself is valid if such remainder conforms to the terms and requirements of
applicable 1 aw and the i ntent o f this A greement. N o controversy concerning any covenant or
provision shall delay time performance of any other covenant or pro-vision except as Inver
allowed.
Page 6 GCA3655
Section 22
Execution and Acceptance
This Agreement may be simultaneously executed in several counterparts, each ofnhich shall be
deemed to be an original having identical legal effect. The Contractor does hereby ratify and
adopt all statements, representations, warraniies, covenants, and agreements and their supporting
materials contained and/or mentioned herein, and does hereby accept State funds and agrees to
all of the terms and conditions thereof.
Section 23
Execution
This Agreement is executed by the Director of the Public Transportation and Rail Di\ision, State
of W ashington, D epartment o f Transportation or the D irector's d esignee. not as an i ndividual
incurring personal obligation and liability, but solely by, for, and on behalf of the State of
Washington, Department of Transportation, in his/her capacity as Director of tite Public
Transportation and Rail Division.
fN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the day and year
first above written.
STATE OF WASHiNGTON CONTRACTOR
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
By: By:
Judith Grniger, Director Print Name:
Public Transportation and Rail Di\ision Title:
Who certifies proper authority to
execute this agreement on behalf of
the Contractor
Date: Date:
Approved as to form by:
Jeanne A. Cushman
Assistant Attorney General
Counsel to WSDOT
Date: July 30, 2003
Page 7 CCA3655
E\hibit I
Funding allocation methodology
Funding allocated by WSDOT for local implementation of CTR activities is based on the
following formula:
1. Each county is provided $1,200 per affected x\orksite as a base allocation to ensure
sufficient funding to meet jurisdiction obligations pursuant to RCW.70.94.521-551. The
number of affected \worksites in each county shall be based on information contained in
WSDOT database as of May 1 of each year.
2. The remaining funding will be allocated based on the number of commute trips reduced
per day in each county between each worksite's base year survey and its most recent
survey,provided that every county receives at least 580,000 per year. For the period July
1,2003 through June 30, 2004, the most recent survey period wwill be 2001. For the
period July 1, 2004 through June 30, 2005, the most recent survey period will be 2003.
July 1, 2003—June 30, 2004 Allocation
Additional
Trips Worksite to Achieve
Number Reduced/ Base Performance 580,00 Total
County or Sites Dav Allocation Allocation Floor Allocation
Benton 550,00
Clark 47 654 S56,401 520.26 53,33 S80,00
King 552 11,575 S662,40C 520.27 5942,67
Kitsap 32 0 S38,401C $ 541.60 580,000 0
Pierce 83 4.278 599,60 S103,5851 1 5203,185
Snohomish 84 1,050 $100,80 $25,424 5126.22
Spokane 99 2.255 5118,80 554,601 5173,401
Thurston 65 579 $78,001 $14,02 592,02
Whatcom 23 329 527,60 510,195 542,205 580,00
Yakima 20 304 524.00 $9,42 546,58 580,00
TOTAL 1,005 21,024 $1,206,00 5517,781 $133,711 51,907,500.0
Any distribution of funds to jurisdictions within a county shall be done on time basis of the
number of affected Nvorksites in each jurisdiction. For example, if there are t%%o jurisdictions in a
county, each \N ith fifty percent of time total number of affected worksites in the county,any
division of funds within the county should provide each of the two jurisdictions with fitly
percent of the total county funding allocation.
10
Page 8 CCA3655
EXHIBIT 11
SCOPE OF NVORK
Implementation of Commute Trip Reduction (CTR)
Plans and Program
CONTRACTOR TASKS
1. General administration
The Contractor will administer a Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) ordinance and implement
a CTR program for major employers as required by RCW 70.94.521 et. seq.
2. Funding Distribution and Reporting
The Contractor may distribute funds to affected jurisdictions, or their designees, within the
county implementing CTR plans and ordinances as required by RCW 70 94.544 by entering
into agreement as appropriate with other jurisdictions, local transit agencies, regional
transportation planning organizations, or other organizations. The Contractor shall submit to
WSDOT a list of dollar amounts to be disbursed by the Contractor to local jurisdiction(s)
local transit agencies, regional transportation planning organizations, or independent
contractors, or a fund dispersion methodology within thirty (30) days of approval of any
agreements bet%N een the Contractor and other parties.
3. Implementation Plans
The Contractor, the affected jurisdictions, or its designee, shall implement all of the
provisions I isted b elow. T he C contractor s hall i nclude a 11 o f t hese p rovisions i n i nterlocal
agreements with other jurisdictions, local transit agencies, regional transportation planning
organizations, or other organizations, as necessary, to coordinate tine development,
implementation, and administration of CTR plans and ordinances.
3.1 Appeals, Exemptions, and Modifications
Maintain an appeals process. This process must be consistent with RCW 70.94.534(6)
and procedures contained in the Commute Trip Reduction Task Force Guidelines. The
Contractor, or their designees,will submit requests for exemptions or modifications,
including requests for goal modifications,to WSDOT for review and comment within
five(5)days of receiving such requests, and shall allow WSDOT five(5)%xorking days to
provide comments prior to approving or denying the request.
3.2 Survey Processing
Notify WSDOT prior to sending any surveys to the University of Washington, Office of
Educational Assessment for processing. The notification must include the name of the
worksite, employer identification code, and type of survey for each survey being
submitted for processing. The notification shall be submitted as an electronic spreadsheet
via electronic mail. The Contractor agrees to wait for confirmation from WSDOT prior
to sending or delivering tine sur\eys for processing.
Page 9 GCA3655
3.3 Database Updates
Provide WSDOT with updated lists of affected «orksites and jurisdiction contacts on a
quarterly basis. These updates N%ill be submitted electronically in a format specified by
WSDOT.
3.4 Emplo%er Annual Reports
Within 30 days from the date of approval, submit to WSDOT one electronic orhard copy
of any approved employer annual reports.
3.5 Employer Exemptions and Coal Alodifications
Within 30 days from the date of approval, submit to WSDOT the name and employer
identification code for any work-site that has been granted an exemption or goal
modification. Include information about the duration of all exemptions and information
on the type of goal modification granted.
3.6 Progress Report and Invoice
Submit to WSDOT periodic progress reports, as detailed in Exhibit 111, along i+ith any
invoice or request for reimbursement.
\N'SDOT TASKS
1. General Technical Assistance
WSDOT will provide support to the Contractor, or their designees, in developing and
implementing CTR plans and programs, including providing training, informational
materials, and assistance in CTR evaluation. WSDOT will also assist m1h oicrall CTI�
marketing and promotion on a statewide basis.
2. Exemptions and Alodifrcalions
WSDOT will review and comment on employer requests for .waivers and modifications,
including requests for goal modifications, within five (5) working days. Failure to review
and comment on such requests within five (5) working days shall be considered a forfeiture
of the right to comment on the request.
3. Database Management
WSDOT will maintain a current database of all affected %\orksites in Washington State.
WSDOT will input new and/or updated worksite information ,\ithin fifteen (15) working
days of receipt from local jurisdictions. WSDOT will employ an internal verification process
to ensure all new and/or updated information is input in a timely and accurate manner.
Information from the WSDOT database will be used to determine funding allocation
consistent .with the methodology contained in Exhibit 1, Funding Allocation methodology.
4. Training
WSDOT will develop and maintain employer and jurisdictions training materials to support
local implementation of the CTR program.
Page 10 GCA3655
5. Public Ammareness
WSDOT will develop and implement statewide public awareness and recognition programs
to support local implementation of the CTR program in affected jurisdictions.
6. Annual Reporting Assistance
WSDOT will distribute in sufficient quantities the State"Program Description& Employer
Annual Report" fort to time Contractor, affected jurisdiction, or its designee, as requested.
WSDOT will also maintain an intemet-based annual report system, and will provide
information and ongoing technical assistance to employers and jurisdictions using the
system.
7. Survey Assistance
WSDOT a ill:
7.1 Provide the Contractor,or their designees, with summary survey information as
requested.
7.2 Distribute the Employee Questionnaires in sufficient numbers to the Contractor,or its
designees, as requested.
7.3 Maintain an intemet-based survey tool, and provide information and ongoing technical
assistance to employers and jurisdictions using the system.
7.4 Provide survey processing at no cost to time Contractor, or their designees, and affected
employers, during the base year and all subsequent sun eys required by tlme Contractor.
7.5 Provide technical assistance to the Contractor, or their designees, and employers,on
surve)ing, as requested.
7.6 Work with the Contractor, or their designees, to calculate goal measurement infomlation
and track measurement survey history for all CTR affected %%orksites.
7.7 Return the processed Employee Questionnaires and survey reports to the Contractor, or
their designees, within thirty (30)days of time date time forms are delivered for processing.
7.8 Maintain and periodically update the "CTR Guide for Employer Surveys."WSDOT will
review survey guide/instructional materials developed by the Contractor or its designees
for consistency with the state-deN eloped "CTR Guide for Employer Surveys."
7.9 Review all electronically submitted survey notifications and respond to time Contractor
within five (5) working days.
Page 11 CCA3655
Exhibit 111
Progress Report Format
• Name of the Organization Submitting Report:
• Submitted on behalf of following Jurisdiction(s):
• Contact Name:
• Contact Phone and Fax Number:
• Contact E-mail:
1. CTR Activities
A brief summary of activities undertaken during the period for which reimbursement is
requested.
2. State CTR Funds Disbursed
Disbursed Total Disbursed
Jurisdiction Since Last Report Fiscal Year to Date
Jurisdiction A $ $
Jurisdiction B S $
(etc)
Total Disbursement $ S
Page 12 CCA3655
3. Expenditures This Period
List actual total expenditures on the last line of the following table. Estimate
expenditures by category as indicated.
Local Fisc'it Year Other Fiscal Year
Funds to Date Funds to Date
State CTR Fiscal Year Spent on Local Spent on Other
Funds To Date CTR Funds CTR Funds
Spent State CTR Acti%ities Spent on Acti%itics Spent on
Since Last Funds Since Last CTR Since Last CTR
Cateo,ories Report Sent Report Acti%ities Report Actilitics
Required Activities, S $ S $ $ S
including;
1. Notification of
New Worksites
2. Administering
CTR Surveys
3. Employer
Annual Report
Review
4. Exemptions and
Modifications
5. Record
Maintenance
6 Enforcement
Emplo3 er Ser,,ice Actis ities
Emp)oyer Training S $ Is is Is S
Incentives $ $ $ Is is $
Promotion and $ S S $ $ S
Marketing
Guaranteed Ride S S S $ $ S
Home
Other(Specify) is Is s S S $
Totals Is Is is $ is Is
4. Jurisdiction(s) Contact Names,Address, and Phone numbers
Jurisdiction A John Who City of X PO Box 1234 X, WA 95000 Phone(206)999-9999
5. List of contact information for affected tsorlsites in the Jurisdiction.
The information will be submitted in the electronic format approved by WSDOT.
6. Emplo3er Annual Reports Appro%cd During This Period
Provide the name and worksite identification number for all employer annual reports approved
during this period. Attach a hard copy or electronic (disc) copy of any employer annual reports
approved by the jurisdiction during the quarter. If the jurisdiction approved employer annual
reports submitted via WSDOT's web-based reporting system, indicate the name and worksite
identification number for each Nvorksite report approved.
Page 13 CCA3655
7, EmploN er Exemptions and Coal dlodifications Cranled During.This Period
Pro%ide the name and%vorksite identification number for any worksite that bas been
granted an exemption or goal modification during this period. Include infonnation about
the duration of all exemptions and infomiation on the tlpe of goal modification granted.
Page 14 CCA3655
Kent City Council Meeting
Date September 2, 2003
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: SIX-YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PLAN— SET
HEARING DATE
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works Committee,
authorization to set September 16, 2003 as the Public Hearing date on the adoption of
the Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program(2004—2009).
3. EXHIBITS: Public Works Director's memorandum and Six-Year Transportation
Improvement Plan (TIP)
4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
6. EXPENDITURE REOUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 6G
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Don E. Wickstrom, P.E. Public Works Director
Phone.253-856-5500
Fax- 253-856-6500
K E N T
WASHINGTON Address: 220 Fourth Avenue S.
Kent,WA 98032-5895
DATE: Au ust 18, 2003
TO: M&hite and Kent City Council
FROM: D ickstrom, Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Six-Year Transportation Improvement Plan, 2004-2009
MOTION: Recommend adoption of the Six-Year Transportation Improvement Plan
for the period 2004-2009.
SUMMARY: The 2004-2009 Six Year TIP includes 29 projects, with estimated project costs
totaling $175,646,000.
BUDGET IMPACT: As itemized in attached Project Descriptions
No Unbudgeted Fiscal/Personnel Impact
BACKGROUND:
Deleted from the 2003-2008 TIP
COMPLETED OR IN-PROGRESS
132nd Ave SE Widening
2481h Street Improvements
James Street at Central Intersection Improvement
132nd Ave SE at Kent Kangley Road Intersection Improvement
South 277ih Street Corridor, Phase 2
DELAYED FOR FUTURE FUNDING
South 212ih Street Railroad Grade Separation
Added to 2004-2009 TIP
Second Ave North and West Smith Street Intersection Improvement
Central Avenue North and Pioneer Street Intersection Improvement
Central Avenue and Burlington Northern Railroad Crossings Intertie(5 intersections)
Changed
S 2281h Railroad Grade Separation split into two distinct projects. One for each RR.
Willis Street Railroad Grade Separation split into two distinct projects. One for each RR.
S 277ih Street Corridor Extension was previously called the 1161h Ave SE Street
Widening Project.
0
Mayor White and Kent City Council
8/13/2003
1
•
CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON
SIX-YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM
2004 - 2009
•
•
KEN T
WASH I N G T O N
Mayor Jim White
Don E. Wickstrom, P.E.
Director of Public Works
•
CITY OF KENT
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Project Project Name
Number Project Location and Extent Page
1. Pacific Highway South (SR 99) HOV Lanes —North Phase I
South 252 `i Street to Kent-Des Moines Road(SR 516)
2. Pacific Highway South (SR 99) HOV Lanes—South Phase 2
South 272nd Street to South 252"`i Street
3. Kent Station Infrastructure Improvements 3
Vicinity of 41h Avenue North and Ramsay bVgy
4. 41h Avenue North and West Smith Street 4
Intersection Improvement
5. Second Avenue North and West Smith Street 5
Intersection improvements
6. Central Avenue North and Pioneer Street 6 .
Intersection improvements and widening of Pioneer Street
7. Military Road South at Reith Road 7
Intersection Improvement
8. South 2281h Street Corridor Project-Phase I 8
Military Road South to 54`h Avenue South
9. Central Avenue/Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad 9
Grade Crossings Signals Intertie
Interconnection of intersection traffic signals along Central Avenue
Mth BNSFRR grade-crossing signals
10. South 228'h Street Extension/Burlington Northern Santa Fe 10
Railroad Grade Separation Project
Grade separation crossing at Burlington Northern Santa Fe RR
11. South 228'h Street Extension/Union Pacific Railroad Grade 11
Separation Project
Grade Separation Crossings at Union Pacific Railroad
i
M CITY OF KENT
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Project Project Name
Number Project Location and Extent Pape
12. Interurban Trail Crossings Signal Interconnect with West Meeker 12
Street and West Smith Street Signal Systems
13. South 2121h Street Pavement Rehabilitation Project 13
Green River Bridge to West Valley Highway (SR 181)
14. 84`h Avenue South Pavement Rehabilitation Project 14
SR 167 to South 212`i' Street
15 72"d Avenue South Extension 15
South 100`i' Street to South 196`h Street
16. South 2771h Street Corridor Extension 16
1161h Ave Southeast Widening Kent-Kangley Road(SR 516) to
Southeast 2Mh Street
17. Central Avenue South Pavement Rehabilitation 17
Green River Badge to East Willis Street (SR 516)
18. Military Road South Widening- Phase 1 18
Reith Road to Kent-Des Moines Road(SR 516)
19. Willis Street (SR516)/Union Pacific Railroad Grade Separation 19
Project
Grade Separation Crossing at Union Pacific Railroad
20. Willis Street(SR 516)/Burlington Northern Santa Fe 20
Railroad Grade Separation Project
Grade Separation Crossing at Burlington Northern/Santa Fe Railroad
21. 80th Avenue South Widening 21
South 196th Street to South 188th Street
22. South 272"d Street Widening- Phase 1 22
26`h Avenue South to Military Road South
23. South 272"d Street Widening- Phase 11 23
Pacific Highway South (SR 99) to 26'h Avenue South
it
CITY OF KENT
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Project Project Name
Number Project Location and Extent Page
24. South 272"d Street Widening- Phase III 24
Pacific Highwav South to Military Road South and 1-5 HOV Loop-Ramp
25 South 228`h Street Corridor Project- Phase III 25
84"'Avenue South to 10 h Avenue Southeast (Benson Road) (SR 515)
26. Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements 26
Ongoing Citywide Program
27. Guardrail and Safety Improvements 27
Ongoing Citywide Program
28. Americans with Disabilities Act Compliance Sidewalk 28
Repair and Rehabilitation
Ongoing Crtvivnde Program
29. Commuter/Shopper Shuttle Bus Project 29
Ongoing Citywide Prograin
30 MAP OF THE PROJECTS 30
iii
CITY OF KENT
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
YEAR: 2004
PROJECT: Pacific Highway South (SR 99) HOV Lanes—North Phase
South 252nd Street to Kent-Des Moines Road (SR 516)
DESCRIPTION: Widen Pacific Highway South to provide a pair of HOV (High Occupancy
Vehicle) lanes from South 252nd Street to the Kent-Des Moines Road(SR
516). The project will also provide a seven foot wide concrete sidewalk
and modify existing traffic signal systems at South 2401" Street, and at
South 252rid Street. The project will include construction of full width
paving; concrete curbs and gutters; landscaping; storm drainage; utilities;
and appurtenances.
PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering... ..........$1,200,000
Right of Way Acquisition...............$530,000
Construction ................................$6,720,000
TOTAL........................................$894509000
FUNDING SOURCE (S): STP, TB, TIA, City of Kent, WSDOT
Funded
PROJECT
JUSTIFICATION: This project will reduce peak hour single-occupant vehicle trips by
encouraging high occupancy vehicle usage. Pacific Highway South
(SR 99) is a regionally significant north-south arterial heavily used by
commuters for access from South King County to the employment
centers in South Seattle, and provides alternative access to 1-5 and Sea-
Tac airport.
AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State],CA.lQ-Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FAST-Freight Action
Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FhLSIB-Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA-Federal
Transit Administration[Federal],IICS-Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS-Intelligent Transportation Systems[Federal],LID-
Local Improvement District,PWTF-Public works Trust Fund Loan[State],STP-Surface Transportation Program[Federal],
T1.A-Transportation Improvement Account,TIB-Transportation Improvement Board[State], TPP—Transportation Partnership
Program[State]
1
CITY OF KENT
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
YEAR: 2004
PROJECT: Pacific Highway South (SR 99) HOV Lanes—South Phase
South 272"d Street to South 252"d Street
DESCRIPTION: Widen Pacific Highway South to provide a pair of HOV (High Occupancy
Vehicle) lanes from South 272"d Street to South 252"d Street. The project
will also provide a seven foot wide concrete sidewalk, and modify existing
traffic signals at the Fred Meyer Shopping Center, South 2601h Street, and
South 272"d Street. The project will include construction of full width
paving; concrete curbs and gutters; landscaping; storm drainage; utilities;
and appurtenances.
PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering.................$900,000
Right of Way Acquisition............$1,600,000
Construction ............. ..................$6,100,000
TOTAL........................................S8,600,000
FUNDING SOURCE (S): STP,TIB, AIP, TPP, City of Kent, WSDOT Funds
Funded
PROJECT
JUSTIFICATION: The project will reduce peak hour single-occupant vehicle trips by
encouraging high occupancy vehicle usage. Pacific Highway South
(SR 99) is a regionally significant north-south arterial heavily used by
commuters for access from South King County to the employment
centers in South Seattle, and provides additional access to I-5 and Sea-
Tac Airport.
AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State];CXIAQ-Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FAST-Freight Action
Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FbLS18-Freight Mobility Strategic Imestment Board[State],FTA-Federal
Transit Administration[Federal],RES-Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS-Intelligent Transportation Systems[Federal],LID-
Local Improvement District;PIVTF-Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State];STP-Surface Transportation Program[Federal],
TIA-Transportation Improvement Account,TIB-Transportation Improvement Board[State],TPP—Transportation Partnership
Program[State]
2
CITY OF KENT
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
YEAR: 2004
PROJECT: Kent Station Infrastructure Improvements
Vicinity of 41h Avenue North and Ramsay Way
DESCRIPTION: Widen 2nd Avenue North to provide two travel lanes with left turn
pockets at intersections, and on-street parking between West Smith Street
and West Temperance Street. Construct the north half of West
Temperance Street between 2"d Avenue North and 1st Avenue North.
Construct Ramsay Way from West Temperance Street to 4th Avenue
North and install a traffic signal at 4th Avenue North and Ramsay Way.
Widen 1st Avenue North to three lanes from West Temperance Street to
West James Street. The project will include full width paving; concrete
curbs, gutters, and sidewalks; landscaping; storm drainage; utilities; and
appurtenances.
PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering.................$390,000
Right of Way Acquisition............................0
Construction ................................$1,930,000
TOTAL........................................$29320,000
FUNDING SOURCE (S): CMAQ, City of Kent
Funded
PROJECT
JUSTIFICATION: This project provides the necessary transportation infrastructure for
development of Kent Station and adjacent properties. The project is
coordinated with transit and commuter rail improvements in and around
the vicinity of Kent Station and the Kent Transit Center sites. The project
includes street improvements required for the development of the site, as
well as mitigation measures (traffic signal) to accommodate access to the
City arterial street system.
AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State],CMAQ-Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FAST-Freight Action
Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FMSIB-Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA-Federal
Transit Administration[Federal],RES-Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS-intelligent Transportation Systems[Federal],LID-
Local Improvement District,P66TF-Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State],.STP-Surface Transportation Program[Federal],
TIA-Transportation Improvement Account, T18-Transportation Improvement Board[State],TPP—Transportation Partnership
Piogram[State]
3
CITY OF KENT 40
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
YEAR: 2004
PROJECT: 4`h Avenue North and West Smith Street Intersection Improvements
Intersection Improvement
DESCRIPTION: Reconstruct the 4th Avenue North and West Smith Street intersection by
widening each approach to add a left turn pocket with appropriate left turn
storage and upgrade the traffic signal. This project will include
construction of full width paving; concrete curbs, gutters, and sidewalks;
landscaping; storm drainage; utilities, and appurtenances.
PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering.................$185,000
Right of Way Acquisition...............$140,000
Construction ...................................$635,000
TOTAL...........................................$960,000
FUNDING SOURCE(S): FTA, City of Kent, ITS
Funded
PROJECT
JUSTIFICATION: The intersection currently has four lanes on each approach. Volumes are
such that it is necessary to operate the signal to serve only one approach
at a time. This project widens each approach to provide for a separate
left turn pocket with appropriate storage. This allows a much more
efficient operation of the signal at this intersection, and significantly
enhances the traffic signal progression along both of these heavily
traveled arterial corridors. This project also improves traffic operations
and provides arterial capacity for urban revitalization and serves as a key
transit corridor.
AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State], CMAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Fcdcrul],FAST—Frctght Action
Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FM.SIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA—Federal 10
Transit Administration[Federal],LIES—Hazard Elimination [Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems[Federal],LID—
Local Improiement District,PIITF—Public works Trust Fund Loan[State],STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal],
TI4—Transportation Improvement Account, TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State],TPP—Transportation Partnership
Program[State]
4
CITY OF KENT
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
YEAR: 2004
PROJECT: Second Avenue North and West Smith Street
DESCRIPTION: Minor widening on West Smith Street to provide separate left turn lanes,
traffic signalization, traffic signal interconnect, and an intertie to the
Burlington Northern/Santa Fe Railroad grade crossing signal
PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering.................$200,000
Right of Way Acquisition..........................$0
Construction ............................. .....$800,000
TOTAL........................................$1,0009000
FUNDING SOURCE (S): City of Kent, ITS
PROJECT
JUSTIFICATION: The signal provides access to/from the Kent Transit Station which
includes the bus center plus connections to each of the commuter rail
platforms and the downtown Park & Ride parking structure. This
intersection also provides the principal pedestrian connection between the
historic downtown area, the Kent Transit Station, and the planned Transit
Oriented Development (TOD) referred to as Kent Station.
A1P-Arterial Improvement Program[State],C RAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FiIST—Freight Action
Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FA/.51B—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA—Federal
Transit Administration[Federdl],IICS—Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems[Federal],LID—
Local Improvement District,PIVTF—Public works Trust Fund Loan[State],.STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal],
TIA—Transportation Improvement Account, TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State],TPP—Transportation Partnership
Program[State]
5
CITY OF KENT
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
YEAR: 2004
PROJECT: Central Avenue North/Pioneer Street
Intersection improvement and widening of Pioneer Street
DESCRIPTION: Widening of Central Avenue North and Pioneer Street intersection,
widening of Pioneer Street, and traffic signal improvements
PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering.................$100,000
Right of Way Acquisition..........................$0
Construction ...................................$336,000
TOTAL...........................................$4369000
FUNDING SOURCE (S): City of Kent, ITS
PROJECT
JUSTIFICATION: Improvements to the corner radii and widening of Pioneer Street will
enhance t ransit access t o t he K ent T ransit C enter. The s ignal u pgrade
includes traffic signal interconnect to the traffic signal system. This
project is crucial to providing adequate access for the regional transit
services to maneuver their buses into the Kent Transit Center and
circulate through the Transit Center with minimal conflict from
pedestrian or vehicle traffic.
AIP-Arterial Impro),cment Program[State],CMAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FAST—Freight Action
Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FM.SIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA—Federal
Transit Administration[Federal],HES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS—Intel Iigent Transportation Systems[Federal],LID—
Local Improvement District,POTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State],STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal];
TLd—Transportation Improvement Account, TIQ—Transportation Improvement Board[State], TPP—Transportation Partnership
Program[State]
6
CITY OF KENT
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
YEAR: 2004
PROJECT: Military Road South at Reith Road
Intersection Improvement
DESCRIPTION: Widen all approaches of Military Road South at Reith Road intersection to
provide exclusive left turn lanes for each approach, and exclusive
right turn lanes for northbound and southbound traffic on Military Road
South and westbound traffic on Reith Road. Modify the existing traffic
signal. The project will include the construction of full width paving,
paved shoulders, street lighting, storm drainage, utilities and
appurtenances.
PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering.............. ..$100,000
Right of Way Acquisition.................$50,000
Construction ................ ..................$900,000
TOTAL........................................$I,050,000
FUNDING SOURCE (S): AIP, City of Kent, STP
Partially Funded
PROJECT
JUSTIFICATION: The level of development on the Kent West Hill, coupled with the growth
in the Puget Sound area and the regularly occurring congestion along
both Pacific Highway South and Interstate 5 results in significant
congestion at this intersection in the morning and evening peak hours.
AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State],('tiIAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],rAST—Freight Action
Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FMSIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA—Federal
Transit Administration[Federal],HES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems[Federal],LID—
Local Improvement District,PPVTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State],STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal],
TIA—Transportation Improvement Account,TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State], TPP—Transportation Partnership
Program[State]
CITY OF KENT
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
YEAR: 2004
PROJECT: South 228th Street Corridor- Phase I
Military Road South to 541h Avenue South
DESCRIPTION: Preliminary engineering and construction of a new five-lane roadway from
SR-516 along Military Road South to approximately Bolger Road, then
from Military Road South to 54th Avenue South, including a new bridge
over the Green River. The project will include the construction of full-
width paving; a bridge; concrete curbs, gutters, sidewalks and/or paved
shoulders; street lighting; storm drainage; landscaping; utilities and
appurtenances. The project may include the installation of traffic signals
at the Corridor's intersections with Military Road South and Lakeside
Boulevard.
PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering..... . ......$4,800,000
Right of Way Acquisition........... $1,800,000
Construction ..............................$20,400,000
TOTAL......................................$2790009000
FUNDING SOURCE (S): TPP, City of Kent, LID,TIB, FMSIB, PWTF
PROJECT
JUSTIFICATION: James Street and Meeker Street `corridors' are not feasible to widen
sufficiently to accommodate forecast traffic volumes and future
development. West Meeker Street currently represents the only east-west
arterial that crosses the Green River between SR 516 and South 212th
Street. This project will provide required east-west capacity.
ALP-Arterial Improvement Program[State],meiQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal].FAST—Freight Action
Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FMSIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA—Federal
Transit Administration[Federal],11CS—Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems[Federal];LID—
Local Improvement District,PR'TF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State],STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal],
TIA—Transportation Improvement Account,TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State], TPP—Transportation Partnership
Program[State]
8
CITY OF KENT
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
YEAR: 2004
PROJECT: Central Avenue and Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad Grade
Crossings Signals Intertie
DESCRIPTION: Improvements to the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad grade
crossing signals. Includes installation of detector loops near the grade
crossing and the intertie cable in underground conduit between the railroad
grade signal and the corresponding traffic signal on Central Avenue at five
arterials (East James Street, East Smith Street, East Meeker Street, East
Gowe Street, and East Willis Street).
PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering...................S20,000
Right of Way Acquisition..........................So
Construction ............................... ...$120,000
TOTAL...........................................$140,000
FUNDING SOURCE (S): City of Kent, ITS
PROJECT
JUSTIFICATION: These i mprovements t o t he r ailroad grade c rossing s ignals a nhance t he
safety of the arterial street crossings of the Burlington Northem/Santa Fe
Railroad, a requirement of the Washington Utilities and Trade
Commission (WUTC) to allow increased tram operating speeds for
passenger and freight rail. The increase in operating speed (with
appropriate safety upgrades) is essential to increasing the number of
trains through the region, improving mobility and capacity for freight rail
and passenger rail. Central Avenue is a Principal Arterial street, roughly
parallel to the BNSFRR and approximately 480 feet easterly of the
centerline of the BNSFRR tracks.
AIP-Arterial Improvcment Program[State],CAIAQ-Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FAST-Frcight Action
Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FM.SIB-Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA-Federal
Transit Administration[Federal],JIGS-Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS-Intelligent Transportation Systems[Federal],LID-
Local Improvement District,POTF-Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State],STP-Surface Transportation Program[Federal];
TIA-Transportation Improvement Account, TIB-Transportation Improvement Board[State], TPP—Transportation Partnership
Program[State]
9
CITY OF KENT
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
YEAR: 2004
PROJECT: South 228th Street/Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad Grade
Separation Project
Grade Separation crossing at Burlington Northem/Santa Fe Railroad
DESCRIPTION: Construct grade separation of the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad
mainline tracks at South 228°i Street. The project will include the
construction of a railroad bridge, road underpass; full-width paving;
concrete curbs, gutters, and sidewalks; street lighting, utilities and
appurtenances.
PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering..............$2,250,000
Right of Way Acquisition............$1,000,000
Construction ..............................$13,750,000
TOTAL......................................$17,000,000
FUNDING SOURCE (S): City of Kent, TIB,PWTF loan, FAST, FMSIB, Burlington
Northem/Santa Fe Railroad
PROJECT
JUSTIFICATION: The project will lead to a seamless connection between major freight
handlers and their primary destinations. This project will support freight
moving through Kent to the Ports of Seattle and Tacoma, Sea-Tac Airport
and the freeway system. Grade separating the arterial will increase both
rail and roadway capacity, decrease congestion, enhance safety, and
improve freight mobility in this corridor and throughout the region. This
project will provide regional connections between thousands of
businesses, employers, and 40 million square feet of warehouse/industrial
space. The level of freight and passenger rail traffic on the BNSF
Railroad mainline is rising as a consequence of increased traffic in the
Puget Sound area, and new Sound Transit and Amtrak service.
AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State],CAUQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FAST—Freight Action
Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FMS1B—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA—Federal
Transit Administration[Federal],TIES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems[Federal],LID—
Local Improvement District,PWTF—Public works Trust Fund Loan[Stale],.STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal],
TIA—Transportation Improvement Account, TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State],TPP—Transportation Partnership
Program[State]
10
CITY OF KENT
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
YEAR: 2004
PROJECT: South 228`' Street/Union Pacific Railroad Grade Separation Project
Grade Separation crossing at Union Pacific Railroad
DESCRIPTION: Construct grade separation of the Union Pacific Railroad mainline tracks
at South 2281h Street. The project will include the construction of a
railroad bridge structure, a bicycle and pedestrian bridge, and a road
underpass; full-width paving; concrete curbs, gutters and sidewalks; street
lighting; utilities and appurtenances.
PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering..............$3,000,000
Right of Way Acquisition............$1,000,000
Construction ..............................$17,000,000
TOTAL......................................$21,000,000
FUNDING SOURCE (S): City of Kent, TIB, PWTF loan, FAST, FMSIB, Union Pacific
Railroad
PROJECT
JUSTIFICATION: The project will lead to a seamless connection between major freight
handlers and their primary destinations. This project will support freight
moving through Kent to the Ports of Seattle and Tacoma, Sea-Tac Airport
and the freeway system. Grade separating this arterial will increase both
rail and roadway capacity, decrease congestion, enhance safety, improve
freight mobility in this corridor and throughout the region. This project
will provide regional connections for thousands of businesses, employers,
and the 40 million square feet of warehouse/industrial space in the valley.
AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State],CMAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FAST—Freight Action
Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FMSIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA—Federal
Transit Administration[Federal],RES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems[Federal],LID—
Local Improvement District,P16TF—Public works Trust Fund Loan[State],STP—Surface Transportation Program(Federal],
TIA—Transportation Improvement Account,TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State],TPP—Transportation Partnership
Program[State]
11
CITY OF KENT
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
YEAR: 2004
PROJECT: Interurban Trail Crossings Signal Interconnect
West Meeker Street and West Smith Street
DESCRIPTION: Interconnect the existing traffic signals at the Interurban Trail crossings at
West Meeker Street and West Smith Street to the Union Pacific crossing
signals at said streets.
PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering...................$30,000
Construction....................................$240,000
Right of Way Acquisition..................$-0-
TOTAL...........................................$2709000
FUNDING SOURCE (S): STP, City of Kent
PROJECT
JUSTIFICATION: This project is required in order to interconnect the existing street signals
with the railroad crossing signals. It will eliminate potential conflict
where traffic could backup across the railroad tracks.
A1P-Arterial Improvement Program[State], CAIAQ-Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal].FAST-Freight Action
Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FM.SIB-Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA-Federal
Transit Administration[Federal],LIES-Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS-Intelligent Transportation Systems[Federal],LID-
Local Improvement District,PWTF-Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State],.STP-Surface Transportation Program[Federal],
TIA-Transportation Improvement Account, T16-Transportation Improvement Board[State],TPP—Transportation Partnership
Program[State]
12
CITY OF KENT
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
YEAR: 2004
PROJECT: South 212`11 Street Pavement Rehabilitation
Green River Bridge to West Valley Highway(SR 181)
DESCRIPTION: Remove and rehabilitate the existing roadway pavement to add additional
service l i fe t o t he a sphalt r oadway b etween t he G reen R iver bridge a nd
West Valley Highway (SR 181). This project will include the removal and
replacement of the upper two inches of the existing asphalt pavement in
the curb lanes in both directions; and a full-width asphalt pavement
overlay of the entire roadway. This project will also include the selective
replacement of catch basin inlets and driveway approach aprons, and
sections of concrete curbs and gutters.
PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering...................$45,000
Right of Way Acquisition.......................$-0-
Construction ...................................$635,000
TOTAL...........................................$680,000
FUNDING SOURCE (S): STP, City of Kent
Funded
PROJECT
JUSTIFICATION: The existing asphalt pavement along this section of South 212`h Street is
exhibiting signs of distress, as demonstrated by "alligatoring",
longitudinal cracking, and cracking of the concrete curbs and gutters. The
end of the service life of this roadway has been reached. Reconstruction
of the pavement to extend the service life of the roadway and prevent
further degradation is required.
AIP-Artcnal Improvement Program[Stale], Cb1.IQ-Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FAST-Freight Action
Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FMSIB-Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA-Federal
Transit Administration[Federal],IICS-Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS-Intelligent Transportation Systems[Federal],LID-
Local Improvement District,P41TF-Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State],STP-Surface Transportation Program[Federal],
T111-Transportation improvement Account, TIB-Transportation Improvement Board[State],TPP—Transportation Partnership
Program[State]
13
CITY OF KENT
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
YEAR: 2004
PROJECT: 841h Avenue South Pavement Rehabilitation
SR 167 to South 212th Street
DESCRIPTION: Remove and rehabilitate the existing roadway pavement to add additional
service life to the roadway between SR 167 and South 212`h Street. This
project will include the removal and replacement of the existing pavement
in the curb lanes in both directions, and a full-width asphalt concrete
overlay of the entire roadway, and will also include the selective
replacement of catch basin inlets and driveway approach aprons, curbs and
gutters.
PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering.................$145,000
Right of Way Acquisition.......................S-0-
Construction .. ................................$585,000
TOTAL...........................................$730,000
FUNDING SOURCE (S): STP, City of Kent
PROJECT
JUSTIFICATION: The existing pavement along this section of 841h Avenue South is
showing signs of structural distress as demonstrated by "alligatoring",
longitudinal cracking, and cracking of the curbs and gutters. An inverted
crown section also occurs at the former curb line along many of the
sections of this street. This inverted crown section results in the ponding
of stormwater in the street along the seam line, which increases the
failure rate of the roadway pavement.
AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State], CNIAQ-Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FAST-Freight Action
Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FAISIB-Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA-Federal
Transit Administration[Federal];LIES-Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS-Intelligent Transportation Systems[Federal];LID-
Local Improvement District;PfiTF-Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State],STP-Surface Transportation Program[Federal];
TM-Transportation Improvement Account, TIB-Transportation Improvement Board[State].TPP—Transportation Partnership
Program[State]
14
CITY OF KENT
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
YEAR: 2005
PROJECT: 72"d Avenue South Extension
South 200`h Street to South 196`h Street
DESCRIPTION: Construct a new four-lane roadway from South 200`h Street to South 1961h
Street. The project will include the crossing of Mill Creek and
construction of full-width paving; concrete curbs, gutters, and sidewalks;
street lighting; storm drainage; landscaping; utilities and appurtenances.
PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering.... ............$160,000
Right of Way Acquisition...............$680,000
Construction ...................................$580,000
TOTAL........................................$1,4209000
FUNDING SOURCE (S): City of Kent
PROJECT
JUSTIFICATION: Continued development in the northern Kent industrial area, and high
levels of congestion along West Valley Highway between the South 1801h
Street and South 1961h Street corridors, mandate additional north-south
arterial capacity. This project provides some relief for South 180`h Street,
South 1961h Street, and South 2121h Street intersections along West Valley
Highway. It also provides improved access to the South 196th Street
corridor from industrial development along 72nd Avenue South.
AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State],CbGIQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FAST—Freight Action
Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FRUB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA—Federal
Transit Administration[Federal],IIES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems[Federal],LID—
Local Improvement District,PIVTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State],.STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal],
TIA—Transportation improvement Account,TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State],TPP—Transportation Partnership
Program[State]
15
CITY OF KENT
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
YEAR: 2005
PROJECT: South 277ih Street Corridor Extension
Widen 1161h Avenue Southeast from Kent-Kangley Road (SR 516) to
Southeast 2561h Street
DESCRIPTION: Widen 1161h Avenue Southeast to provide a five-lane roadway, including
four general-purpose travel lanes, a two-way left turn lane and a bicycle
facility. Also included in this project will be the widening of the
intersection of Kent-Kangley Road and 1161h Avenue Southeast to add an
additional left turn lane to provide dual left turn lanes westbound on Kent-
Kangley Road to southbound 1161h Avenue Southeast. The project will
include the construction of paving; concrete curbs, gutters, sidewalks;
bicycle lanes; paved shoulders; street lighting; storm drainage; utilities and
appurtenances.
PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering.................$300,000
Right of Way Acquisition............. .$210,000
Construction ................................$1,450,000
TOTAL........................................$19960,000
FUNDING SOURCE (S): TIB, City of Kent, LID
PROJECT
JUSTIFICATION: This project extends the South 277th Street Corridor northward to
Southeast 2561h Street. Traffic studies have indicated that traffic demand
will continue to increase on this section of 116ih Avenue. This roadway
facilitates traffic from Southeast 256'h Street to the 272nd/277th Street
Corridor.
AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State], CAIAQ-Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],PAST-Freight Action
Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FM.SIB-Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA-Federal
Transit Administration[Federal],I/ES-Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS-Intelligent Transportation Systems[Federal],LID-
Local Improvement District,PIITF-Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State],STY-Surface Transportation Program[Federal],
TIA -Transportation Improvement Account, TIB-Transportation Improvement Board[State],TPP—Transportation Partnership
Program[State]
16
CITY OF KENT
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
YEAR: 2005
PROJECT: Central Avenue South Pavement Rehabilitation
Green River Bridge to East Willis Street (SR 516)
DESCRIPTION: Remove and rehabilitate the existing roadway pavement to add additional
service life to the roadway, between the Green River Bridge and East
Willis Street (SR 516. This project will include the removal and
replacement of the upper two inches of the existing pavement in the curb
lanes in both directions, and a full-width asphalt concrete overlay of the
entire roadway, and will also include the selective replacement of c atch
basin inlets, and driveway approach aprons, as well as curbs and gutters.
PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering ..$50,000
Right of Way Acquisition..........................$0
Construction ...................................$550,000
TOTAL...........................................$6009000
FUNDING SOURCE (S): STP, City of Kent
PROJECT
JUSTIFICATION: The existing paving along this section of Central Avenue South is
exhibiting signs of distress, as demonstrated by "alligatoring", longitudinal
cracking, and cracking of the c urbs and gutters. T he s ervice 1 ife o f t his
roadway has been reached, necessitating reconstruction of the pavement to
extend the service life of the roadway, and prevent further pavement
degradation.
AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State],CAIAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],rAST—Freight Action
Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FM.518—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA—Federal
Transit Administration[Federal]:LIES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],1TS—Intelligent Transportation Systems[Federal],LID—
Local Improvement District,PRTF—Public works Trust Fund Loan[State],STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal];
TIA—Transportation Improvement Account,TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State], TPP—Transportation Partnership
Program[Stale]
17
CITY OF KENT
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
YEAR: 2006
PROJECT: Military Road South Widening-Phase I
381h Avenue South to South 248t Street
DESCRIPTION: Widen and re-channelize Military Road South to provide an interim three-
lane roadway, including two general-purpose travel lanes, and a two-way
left turn lane. The project will include the construction of full width
paving, street channelization, street lighting, utilities and appurtenances.
PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering...................$55,000
Right of Way Acquisition.......................S-0-
Construction ...................................$135,000
TOTAL...........................................$1909000
FUNDING SOURCE (S): City of Kent
PROJECT
JUSTIFICATION: The level of development along this section of Military Road South has
reached the point where a three-lane roadway section is required to
accommodate through traffic and provide safe left turn access into the
commercial center southwest of the National Guard facility.
AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State],CMAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FAST—Freight Action
Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FMSIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State),FTA—Federal
Transit Administration[Federal],IILS—Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems[Federal),LID—
Local Improvement District,PGVTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State),STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal];
TIA—Transportation Improvement Account,TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State], TPP—Transportation Partnership
Program[State]
1g
CITY OF KENT
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
YEAR: 2006
PROJECT: Willis Street (SR 516)/Union Pacific Railroad Grade Separation
Project
Grade Separation Crossing at Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR)
DESCRIPTION: Construct grade separation of the Union Pacific Railroad's mainline tracks
at Willis Street (SR 516). The project will provide more efficient
movement of goods and services and will relieve congestion due to train
traffic on the UPRR of approximately 20 trains per day. This results to an
accumulated delay of more than 32 minutes per day at this intersection
alone. The project will include the construction of a railroad bridge; a
roadway under crossing; full-width paving; concrete curbs, gutters, and
sidewalks; street lighting; utilities and appurtenances.
PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering..............$4,000,000
Right of Way Acquisition..........................$0
Construction ..............................$16,000,000
TOTAL......................................$20,000,000
FUNDING SOURCE (S): City of Kent,FAST, FMSIB,Union Pacific Railroad
PROJECT
JUSTIFICATION: This project supports east-west freight and commuter mobility in the
Green River Valley. More than 27,000 vehicles per day travel on Willis
Street, including over 800 freight-bearing trucks. The level of freight
traffic on the UP Railroad mainline is also increasing as a consequence of
economic conditions in the Puget Sound area. Grade separations provide
the solution to the costly problem of congestion. The RR crossing will no
longer impede freight and other traffic flow. Reductions in traffic
congestion on adjoining streets and reduced environmental impacts
caused by traffic congestion is also expected. This project will enhance
Kent as an economic generator and provide regional connections for
thousands of businesses, employers, and commuters.
AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State],CAIAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FAST—Freight Action
Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FM.SIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA—Federal
Transit Administration[Federal],IIES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems[Federal],LID—
Local Improtement District,PWTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State],STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal],
TIA—Transportation improvement Account,TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State]. TPP—Transportation Partnership
Program[State]
19
CITY OF KENT
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
YEAR: 2006
PROJECT: Willis Street (SR 516)/Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad Grade
Separation Project
Grade Separation Crossings at Burlington Northern/Santa Fe Railroad
(BNSFRR)
DESCRIPTION: Construct grade separation at the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad
mainline tracks at Willis Street (SR 516). The project will provide more
efficient movement of goods and services and will relieve congestion due
to train traffic on the BNSFRR of approximately 40 trains per day. This
results in an accumulated delay of an hour each day at this intersection
alone. The project will include the construction of a railroad bndge;
vehicle under crossing; full-width paving; concrete curbs, gutters, and
sidewalks; street lighting; utilities and appurtenances.
PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering..............$3,000,000
Right of Way Acquisition............$3,000,000
Construction ..............................$11,000,000
TOTAL........................................17,000,000
FUNDING SOURCE (S): City of Kent, FAST, FMSIB, Burlington Northern/Santa Fe
Railroad
PROJECT
JUSTIFICATION: This project supports east-west freight and commuter mobility in the
Green River Valley. More than 27,000 vehicles per day travel on Willis
Street, including over 800 freight-bearing trucks. The level of freight and
passenger rail traffic on the BNSF Railroad mainline is also increasing as
a consequence of economic conditions in the Puget Sound area. Grade
separation provides the solution to the costly problem of congestion. The
railroad crossing will no longer impede freight and other traffic flow.
Reductions in traffic congestion on adjoining streets and reduced
environmental impacts caused by traffic congestion is also expected. This
project will enhance Kent as an economic generator and provide regional
connections for thousands of businesses, employers, and commuters.
AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State], CUAQ-Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FAST-Freight Action
Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FUSIB-Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA-Federal
Transit Administration[Federal],NES-Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS-Intelligent Transportation Systems[Federal],LID—
Local Improvement District,PV"F-Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State],STP-Surface Transportation Program[Federal],
Tl l-Transportation Improvement Account, TIB-Transportation Improvement Board[State], TPP—Transportation Partnership
Program[State]
20
CITY OF KENT
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
YEAR: 2007
PROJECT: 80'h Avenue South Widening
South 196th Street to South 188th Street
DESCRIPTION: Widen 80°i Avenue South from South 196th Street to South 188th Street
to five lanes. This will include four general-purpose lanes and a two-way
left turn lane. The project will also include the construction of full-width
paving; concrete curbs, gutters, and sidewalks; street lighting; storm
drainage; utilities and appurtenances.
PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering.................$130,000
Right of Way Acquisition...............$285,000
Construction ...................................$515,000
TOTAL...........................................$9305000
FUNDING SOURCE (S): City of Kent, LID
PROJECT
JUSTIFICATION: The opening of the 196`h Street Condor on the south end of the project
and Renton's completion of Oaksdale Avenue South will result in 801h
Avenue South being a significant north/south corridor serving the
industrial area. As a result, the increased traffic volumes along this section
of 80`h Avenue South could reach the point where a consistent five-lane
roadway section is required to provide safe left turn access into the
adjoining properties. Further, concrete curbs and gutters are required to
provide control of r oadway d rainage and to prevent impacts to adjacent
property owners. Sidewalks and street lighting are to provide safe access
for pedestrians.
All'-Arterial Improvement Program[State],C1*11IQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FAST—Freight Action
Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FM.SIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA—Federal
Transit Administration[Federal],IIES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems[Federal],LID—
Local Improvement District,P6VTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State],STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal];
TIA—Transportation Improvement Account,TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State]; TPP—Transportation Partnership
Program[State]
21
CITY OF KENT
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
YEAR: EAR: 2007
PROJECT: South 272"d Street Widening - Phase 1
261h Avenue South to Military Road South
DESCRIPTION: Widen the intersection of South 272"d Street and Military Road South to
extend the existing left turn pockets on the west and north approaches and
also add an 1100 foot right turn lane on the north approach. The South
272nd Street I-5 undercrossing will be excavated and the existing four
lanes under the bridge widened to seven lanes. These lanes will include
four general-purpose lanes, a two-way left turn lane, and two lanes held in
reserve for Phase III of this project. This project will also include the
construction of full width paving (including shoulders), drainage, utilities
and appurtenances.
PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering..............$1,100,000
Right of Way Acquisition...............$900,000
Construction ................................$5,700,000
TOTAL........................................$797009000
FUNDING SOURCE (S): STP, City of Kent, City of Federal Way, King County,
Sound Transit,TPP
PROJECT
JUSTIFICATION: The traffic volumes along this section of South 272"d Street have reached
the point where additional lanes are required to reduce congestion.
Additional lanes are also required under 1-5 to reduce congestion. The
additional length of the right turn lane from Military Road South will help
prevent extensive backups in the southbound lane. The project will also
relieve congestion near the northside Park and Ride lot.
AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State],CA14Q—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FAST—Freight Action
Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor;FMSIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA—Federal
Transit Administration[Federal],IIES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems[Federal],LID—
Local Improvement District,P;VTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State];STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal],
Till—Transportation Improvement Account, TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State],TPP—Transportation Partnership
Program[State]
22
CITY OF KENT
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
YEAR: 2007
PROJECT: South 272nd Street Widening- Phase I[
Pacific Highway South (SR 99) to 261h Avenue South
DESCRIPTION: Widen South 272nd Street to add one westbound left turn lane at the
intersection of South 272nd Street and Pacific Highway South and left turn
lanes at the South Star Lake Road intersection. If feasible, construction of
curb, gutter, and sidewalks, street lighting, storm drainage facilities,
utilities and appurtenances w ill b e d eferred u ntil P base III of t he S outh
272nd Street Widening Project.
PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering.................$100,000
Right of Way Acquisition............ ....$50,000
Construction ...................................$650,000
TOTAL...........................................$800,000
FUNDING SOURCE (S): STP, City of Kent,TIB
PROJECT
JUSTIFICATION: Traffic volumes along this section of South 272nd Street have reached the
point where widening and additional turn lanes are required to reduce
congestion at the intersections and prevent backups between Pacific
Highway South and I-5. This project will coordinate with access to the
site of a proposed southside Park and Ride lot and with City of Federal
Way improvements west of Pacific Highway South.
AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State],CMAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],F/IST—Freight Action
Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FM.SIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA—Federal
Transit Administration[Federal],HES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems[Federal],LID—
Local Improvement District;PIVTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan [State],STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal],
TIA—Transportation Improvement Account, TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State], TPP—Transportation Partnership
Program[State]
23
CITY OF KENT
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
YEAR: 2008
PROJECT: South 272nd Street Widening-Phase III
Pacific Highway South to Military Road South and I-5 HOV Loop Ramp
DESCRIPTION: Add two HOV Lanes from Pacific Highway South (SR 99) to Military
Road South. An HOV loop-ramp from eastbound South 272nd Street to
northbound 1-5 will also be constructed. Construction will include frill
width paving; concrete curb, gutter, and sidewalks; street lighting; storm
drainage; utilities; and appurtenances.
PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering.................$800,000
Right of Way Acquisition...............$500,000
Construction ................................$6,200,000
TOTAL........................................$7,500,000
FUNDING SOURCE (S): STP,City of Kent,TIB
PROJECT
JUSTIFICATION: Traffic volumes between Pacific Highway South and Military Road
South have reached the point where improvements supporting HOV-
added capacity are required to reduce congestion at the intersections and
reduce backups approaching I-5. The HOV lanes will provide access to
the northside Park and Ride lot and the site of a proposed southside Park
and Ride lot. Adding HOV lanes and HOV access to I-5 supports various
County and City of Federal Way transportation and transit improvement
projects.
AIP-Artendl Improvement Program[State], CAd.4Q—Congestion Mitigation and Air Qudhty[Federal],FAST—Freight Action
Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FM.SIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA—Federal
Transit Administration[Federal],IIES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems[Federal],LID—
Local Improvement District,P;YTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State],STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal),
TIA—Transportation Improvement Account, TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State], TPP—Transportation Partnership
Program[State]
24
CITY OF KENT
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
YEAR: 2008
PROJECT: South 228th Street Corridor- Phase III
84th Avenue South to 104th Avenue Southeast (Benson Road) (SR 515)
DESCRIPTION: Construct a new three to five-lane roadway from 841h Avenue South to
104th Avenue Southeast (Benson Highway) (SR 515), including a new
bridge over SR 167, and modify the traffic signals at the intersection of
South 224`h Street and 84th Avenue South. The project will include the
construction of full-width paving; concrete curbs, gutters, and sidewalks;
street lighting; stonn drainage; bicycle lanes; landscaping; utilities and
appurtenances.
PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering..............$1,500,000
Right of Way Acquisition............$4,800,000
Construction ......................... ....$18,700,000
TOTAL......................................$25,0009000
FUNDING SOURCE (S): TPP, King County, City of Kent, LID
PROJECT
JUSTIFICATION: Additional capacity is required to accommodate existing development in
the East Hill area of the City. The James Street and South 2081h/212th
Street `corridors' are infeasible to widen to accommodate forecast traffic
volumes without additional east-west capacity, based upon existing
development and topographic constraints.
AIP-Arteridl Improvement Program[State],Ch14Q-Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FAST-Freight Action
Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FAHLSIB-Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA-Federal
Transit Administration[Federal];TIES-Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS-Intelligent Transportation Systems[Federal],LID-
Local Improvement District,PWTF-Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State],STP-Surface Transportation Program[Federal];
TIA -Transportation Improvement Account, TIB-Transportation Improvement Board[Stale], TPP—Transportation Partnership
Program[State]
25
CITY OF KENT
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
YEAR: 2004- 2009
PROJECT: Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements
Ongoing Citywide Program
DESCRIPTION: Make miscellaneous improvements to the City's Bicycle Route and
Pedestrian system. Potential projects include improvements to 100th
Avenue Southeast north of South 240th Street; Southeast 248th Street east
of 90 Avenue South; and 152"d Way Southeast north of Southeast 272nd
Street.
PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering...................$60,000
Right of Way Acquisition.......................S-0-
Construction ...................................$562,000
TOTAL...........................................$625,000
FUNDING SOURCE (S): STP,City of Kent
PROJECT
JUSTIFICATION: This p roject c omplies with t he C Ity's C TR (Commute T rip Reduction)
Ordinance and the City Comprehensive Plan. This project helps to reduce
peak hour single-occupant vehicle trips, encourage the use of non-
motorized transportation modes, and provide safe routes for school-age
pedestrians and cyclists.
AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State],CAIAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FAST—Freight Action
Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,F/II.SIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA—Federal
Transit Administration[Federal],IIES—Hazard Elimination[Federal),ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems[Federal);LID—
Local Improvement District,PWTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State),.STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal];
TIA—Transportation improvement Account, TIB—Transportation improvement Board[State], TPP—Transportation Partnership
Program[State]
26
CITY OF KENT
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
YEAR: 2004 - 2009
PROJECT: Guardrail and Safety Improvements
Ongoing Citywide Program
DESCRIPTION: Make miscellaneous guardrail improvements each year to enhance
motorist safety. Candidate projects include Frager Road and 100th Avenue
Southeast (near the 22600 block). Upgrade existing guardrail end-
treatments as mandated by State and Federal regulations.
PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering...................$20,000
Right of Way Acquisition.......................$-0-
Construction ...................................$175,000
TOTAL...........................................$1 95,000
FUNDING SOURCE (S): STP, HES, City of Kent
PROJECT
JUSTIFICATION: This project is mandated by compliance with Federal and State
regulations, and the requirement to eliminate potentially hazardous
roadway conditions.
AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State],CMAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FAST—Freight Action
Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Condor,FMSIB—Freight Mobility Strategic investment Board[State],FTA—Federal
Transit Administration[Federal],RES—Hazard Elimination[Federal],1TS—Intelligent Transportation Systems[Federal],LID—
Local Improvement District,PPfTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State],STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal],
TIA—Transportation Improvement Account;TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State], TPP—Transportation Partnership
Program[State]
27
CITY OF KENT
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
YEAR: 2004 - 2009
PROJECT: Americans with Disabilities Act Compliance Sidewalk Repair and
Rehabilitation
Ongoing Citywide Program
DESCRIPTION: Reconstruct and repair existing sidewalks and pedestrian ramps, and
install new hard-surfaced sidewalks to implement the requirements of the
Federal Government's Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). This
project will include an inventory of the City's sidewalk/walkway facilities,
and identification and correction of existing deficiencies. This project will
also include the construction of concrete curbs, gutters and sidewalks;
minor storm drainage; and appurtenances.
PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering.................$200,000
Right of Way Acquisition.......................S-0-
Construction .......... .....................$1,750,000
TOTAL........................................$1,950,000
FUNDING SOURCE (S): City of Kent
PROJECT
JUSTIFICATION: This project is mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
It repairs existing sidewalks, replaces deficient/substandard and/or
missing wheelchair/pedestrian ramps, and brings same into compliance
with the adopted Federal standards.
AIP-Arterial Improvement Program[State];CAIAQ—Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FAST—Freight Action
Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,FAISIB—Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA—Federal
Transit Administration[Federal],HGS—Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS—Intelligent Transportation Systems[Federal],LID—
Local Improvement District,PWTF—Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State],STP—Surface Transportation Program[Federal];
TIA—Transportation Improvement Account,TIB—Transportation Improvement Board[State], TPP—Transportation Partnership
Program[State]
28
CITY OF KENT
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
YEAR: 2004 -2009
PROJECT: Commuter/Shopper Shuttle Bus
Ongoing Citywide Program
DESCRIPTION: Continue to provide enhanced transit service in the Downtown Kent
business area through the use of a fixed-route shuttle service, with
demand-responsive routing capabilities. Service route points will include
King County Metro Park and Ride, South King County Regional Justice
Center, and Kent City Hall, as well as local shopping and medical
facilities.
PROJECT COST: Preliminary Engineering.........................$-0-
Right of Way Acquisition.......................$-0-
Operations ......................................$140,000
TOTAL...........................................$140,000
*City share, which is equivalent to the lost fare box revenue that the county could have collected
were not the city wanting a free service, (based on 6 years operating cost with 3%inflation).
FUNDING SOURCE (S): King County, City of Kent
PROJECT
JUSTIFICATION: The Shopper Shuttle provides mobility and independence to many of the
city's seniors as well as school children and other citizens with limited
mobility options. The service addresses a significant transit market that
may not be able to use the county's more traditional routes, and helps the
city meet its road safety and transportation demand management goals.
All'-Arterial Improvement Program[State],CMAQ-Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality[Federal],FAST-Freight Action
Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor,F1618-Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board[State],FTA-Federal
Transit Administration[Federal],IICS-Hazard Elimination[Federal],ITS-Intelligent Transportation Systems[Federal],LID-
Local Impro%enient District;PVITF-Public Works Trust Fund Loan[State],STP-Surface Transportation Program[Federal],
TIA-Transportation Improvement Account,TIB-Transportation Improvement Board[State], TPP—Transportation Partnership
Program[State]
29
Kent City Council Meeting
Date September 2, 2003
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: SOUTH 277TH STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT—ACCEPT
AS COMPLETE
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works Committee,
accept the South 277s' Street Improvement project as complete and release the retainage
to Mid Mountain Contractors, Inc. upon standard releases from the State and release of
any liens. The original contract amount was $24,801,423.12. The final contract
amount was $25,702,591.05.
3. EXHIBITS: None
4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Director
. (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
6. EXPENDITURE REOUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 6H
Kent City Council Meeting
Date September 2. 2003
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: 2003 ASPHALT OVERLAYS PROJECT—ACCEPT AS
COMPLETE
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works Committee,
accept the 2003 Asphalt Overlays project as complete and release the retainage to
Western Asphalt upon standard releases from the State and release of any liens. The
original contract amount was $195,249.45. The final contract amount was
$1689775.21.
3. EXHIBITS: None
4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Director
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 6I
Kent City Council Meeting
Date September 2, 2003
Category Consent Calendar
1, SUBJECT: 2004 BUDGET, CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN AMENDMENT
AND SCHOOL DISTRICT CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
UPDATES— SET HEARING DATE
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Set September 16, 2003 as the date for a public
hearing to consider amendment of the Capital Facilities Element of the Kent
Comprehensive Plan and amendment of Chapter 12.13 Kent City Code to incorporate
updated Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent and Federal Way School Districts, addition
of the Capital Facilities Plan of the Auburn School District, and changes to adopted
school impact fees.
3. EXHIBITS: Staff memo from Charlene Anderson dated 8/26/03
4. RECOMMENDED BY: Planning Staff
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 6J
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Fred N. Satterstrom, AICP, Director
PLANNING SERVICES
KEN T Charlene Anderson,AICP, Manager
WASHINGTON Phone 253-856-5454
Fax 253-856-6454
Address 220 Fourth Avenue S
Kent,WA 98032-5895
DATE. AUGUST 26, 2003
TO- MAYOR JIM WHITE, COUNCIL PRESIDENT JUDY WOODS AND CITY
COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: CHARLENE ANDERSON, AICP, PLANNING MANAGER
THROUGH: MAYOR JIM WHITE
SUBJECT: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN/CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT AMENDMENT
AND UPDATE TO CHAPTER 12.13 KENT CITY CODE #CPA-2003-3
MOTION: Set September 16, 2003 as the date for a public hearing to consider amendment of
the Capital Facilities Element of the Kent Comprehensive Plan and amendment of Chapter
12.13 Kent City Code to incorporate updated Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent and Federal
Way School Districts, addition of the Capital Facilities Plan of the Auburn School District, and
changes to adopted school impact fees.
SUMMARY: Kent City Code provides for imposition of school impact fees on behalf of any
school district which provides to the City a capital facilities plan; the plan is adopted by
reference as part of the Capital Facilities Element of the Kent Comprehensive Plan The school
districts are required to submit for annual Council review their updated capital facilities plans.
Based on the recently adopted Ordinance No 3650, the City Council holds the public hearing on
the school district plans at the same time as the public hearing for the budget, i.e., September 16,
2003. The Auburn, Kent and Federal Way School Districts have submitted updated Capital
Facilities Plans for Council review and consideration The City of Kent 6-year Capital
Improvement Program also will update the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan
but will be considered in a later public hearing on the draft budget document
BUDGET IMPACT: None
BACKGROUND: One of the planning goals under the Growth Management Act (RCW
36.70A 020) is to ensure that those public facilities and services necessary to support
development are adequate and timely to serve the development without decreasing current
service levels below minimum standards. The Act (RCW 36 70A.070) also requires the Capital
Facilities Element of the Kent Comprehensive Plan to inventory existing capital facilities,
forecast future needs and provide for financing of those facilities. RCW 82.02.050 authorizes
cities planning under the Growth Management Act to impose impact fees on development
activity as part of the financing for public facilities needed to serve new growth and
development. As a result, KCC 12.13.080 provides for imposition of school impact fees on
behalf of any school district which provides to the City a capital facilities plan; the plan is
adopted by reference as part of the Capital Facilities Element of the Kent Comprehensive Plan.
The school districts are required to submit for annual Council review their updated capital
facilities plans (KCC 12.13.060 & 070).
The Auburn, Kent and Federal Way School Districts propose amendment of the Kent
Comprehensive Plan and Kent City Code Chapter 12 13 to reflect changes to impact fees
resulting from new student population generated by new single family and multifamily
residential development. The updated plans include an inventory of existing facilities, existing
facility needs, expected future facility requirements, and expected funding.
The Kent School District proposes increasing their existing school impact fees for single family
units from $4,147 to $4,292 (an increase of S145 or 3.5%) and for multifamily units from $2,554
to $2,643 (an increase of$89 or 3.5%).
The Federal Way School District proposes decreasing their existing school impact fees for single
family units from $3,865 to $3,269 (a decrease of$596 or 15.4%) and for multifamily units from
$1,086 to $940 (a decrease of$146 or 13.4%).
The Auburn School District proposes school impact fees for single family units of$4,528 and for
multifamily units of $1,212. These impact fees are requested for the impoundment reservoir
property only.
CA\pm S\Permit\Plan\CompPlanAmdments12003\capfacihties2003update doc
cc Fred N Satterstrom,AICP,CD Director
Charlene Anderson,AICP,Planning Manager
Project File#CPA-2003-2/KIVA#2032425
Parties of Record
CPA-2003-3 Comprehensive Plan/Capital Facilities Element Amendment
9/2/03 City Council Meeting
Page 2 of 2
Kent City Council Meeting
Date September 2. 2003
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: EXCUSED ABSENCE FOR COUNCILMEMBER PETERSON—
APPROVE
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Approval of an excused absence from the
September 2, 2003 City Council meeting for Councilmember Peterson.
3. EXHIBITS: None
4. RECOMMENDED BY:
• (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
6. EXPENDITURE REOUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 6K
Kent City Council Meeting
Date September 2. 2003
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: AMENDMENT TO DELINQUENT ACCOUNTS ORDINANCE—
ADOPT
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Adoption of Ordinance No. amending Ch. 3.10
of the Kent City Code regarding delinquent accounts and the assessment of penalties
and interest.
Chapter 3.10 of the Kent City Code establishes interest charges for certain types of
delinquent accounts. The proposed ordinance is primarily a housekeeping amendment
that amends Ch. 3.10 in order to clarify penalties and interest charges assessed for
invoices billed for services or for other amounts due to the city not otherwise
established in the Kent City Code. In addition, this amendment aligns other related
sections regarding collection and unpaid charges for consistency, exempts donors or
grantor agencies from delinquency charges, establishes a minimum interest charge of
$2.00, and authorizes use of a collection agency.
• 3. EXHIBITS: Ordinance
4. RECOMMENDED BY: Operations Committee
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
6. EXPENDITURE REOUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 6L
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City
of Kent, Washington, amending Chapter 3.10 of the Kent
City Code relating to delinquent accounts, clarifying
assessment and collection of penalties and interest, and
aligning other related sections regarding collection of
unpaid charges for consistency.
WHEREAS, Ch. 3.10 of the Kent City Code ("KCC") establishes
interest charges for certain types of delinquent accounts; and
WHEREAS, Ch. 3.10 KCC does not accurately reflect delinquent
i
account policies established elsewhere in the code; and
WHEREAS, this ordinance amends Ch. 3.10 KCC in order to clarify the
amount of interest or service charges assessed for invoices billed for services or other
amounts due to the City that are not otherwise established elsewhere in the code; and
WHEREAS, this ordinance also makes other housekeeping amendments
to related sections in the code regarding collection of unpaid charges in order to make
those revised sections consistent with the other code collection provisions; NOW
THEREFORE,
1 Kent City Code Ch. 3.10—
Delinquent Accounts
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON,
DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. - Amendment. Chapter 3.10 of the Kent City Code is
amended as follows:
CHAPTER 3.10 DELINQUENT ACCOUNTS
Sec. 3.10.010. Definitions . The following words, terms,
and phrases, when used in this chapter, shall have meanings ascribed to them in this
section, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning
Dehnquent shall mean any Afi-account shall be aeefaed to be delinquenI if not
paid within thirty (30) days from of-the date shown on the invoice as the
"invoice date "efty:
Donor shall mean any person, firm, corporation, agency or state or local
government unit that promises or pledges to contribute or that donates money or other
assets to the City without expectation of repayment by the City through monies,
products, or services from the City.
Grantor Agencies shall mean any local government, state agency, or firm that
provides federal, state, or county financial assistance in the form of grants or other
entitlements.
Sec. 3.10.020 Service charge on delinquent accounts. There is her-eb y
i'mpesed upon-all delinquent-aeeeuf.csFeeeiyable, ^^, ethem,ise exempt un der
.,,..ms of this ehapter-,If any person, firm, or corporation fails or neglects to pay any
City invoice within thirty(30) days from the date shown on the invoice as the"invoice
date," a rxeethl-y-service charge of one (1) percent of the amount of the unpaid balance
on the outstanding account or two dollars fifty eents (S 000450), whichever is the
greater-ar»eppt,- will be imposed one month from the date payment was due, and at the
end of each succeeding monthly period, until all past due amounts are paid in full.
2 Kent City Code Ch. 3.10-
Delinquent Accounts
Any invoice or service charge due under this chapter and unpaid shall
constitute a debt to the City. The City may, pursuant to Ch. 19:16 RCW, use a
collection agency to collect outstanding debts, or it may seek collection by court
proceedings, which remedies shall be in addition to all other remedies
See. 3.10.030 Exemption. Bills r F the fu shi f,.t,l,t, sen,iees shall b
eelleetea p nt to KC-C Title 7 Utilities.
A. Donors and jZrantor agencies. Donors or grantor agencies shall be
exempt from the delinquency and collection provisions of this chapter.
B. Code enforcement Code enforcement fines and penalties that have
been assessed in accordance with Ch. 1.04 KCC shall be exempt from the delinquency
and collection provisions of this chapter and shall be subject to the delinquency and
collection provisions of Ch. 104 KCC.
C. Public records Duplication fees owed for public records produced in
accordance with Ch. 105 KCC shall be exempt from the delinquency and collection
provisions of this chapter and shall be subject to the delinquency and collection
provisions of Ch. 105 KCC.
D. Utility taxes. Utility taxes imposed by the City upon all persons
engaged in certain utility business activities defined in Ch. 3.18 KCC shall be exempt
from the delinquency and collection provisions of this chapter and shall be subject to
the delinquency and collection provisions of Ch. 3 18 KCC.
E. Gambling taxes Gambling taxes shall be exempt from the delinquency
and collection provisions of this chapter and shall be subject to the delinquency and
collection provisions of Ch. 3 21 KCC.
3 Kent City Code Ch, 3.10—
Delinquent Accounts
F. Local improvement districts. Bills for local improvement districts
(LIDs) shall be exempt from the delinquency and collection provisions of this chapter
and shall be subject to the delinquency and collection provisions of Ch. 3.22 KCC and
Ch. 6.04 KCC.
G. Business licenses and regulations. Business license and other license
penalties assessed in accordance with Title 5 KCC shall be exempt from the
delinquency and collection provisions of this chapter and shall be subject to the
delinquency and collection provisions of Title 5 KCC.
H. City utility services. Invoices for the furnishingof City utility services
shall be exempt from the delinquency and collection provisions of this chapter and
shall be subject to the delinquency and collection provisions of Ch. 7.01 KCC.
I. Maintenance of landscapinz Invoices for maintenance of landscaping
required by Ch. 15 07 KCC shall be exempt from the delinquency and collection
provisions of this chapter and shall be subject to the delinquency and collection
provisions of Ch. 15.07 KCC,
J. Contracts. If a written contract states different payment terms, the
delinquency and collection provisions of the contract shall apply.
SECTION 3. — Amendment. Section 5.01.180 of the Kent City Code,
entitled "Monetary Penalties," as they pertain to business licenses is amended as
follows:
See. 5.01.180. Penalties.
A. Monetary penalties
1. Penalty for operation of a business enterprise without a license shall be
assessed by the director in an amount not to exceed five hundred dollars ($500). This 0
4 Kent City Code Ch. 3.10—
Delinquent Accounts
penalty shall not apply to business enterprises failing to pay the license renewal fee as
set forth in subsection (A)(2)below.
2. Failure to pay the license fee within ninety (90) days after the date of
expiration, pursuant to KCC 5.01.110, shall subject the licensee to a monetary penalty
in the amount of fifty dollars ($50) to reinstate the license, in addition to the required
license fee.
B. Collection. Any license fee or tax due and unpaid and delinquent under this
chapter, shall constitute a debt of the City. The City may, pursuant to Ch. 19.16 RCW,
use a collection agency to collect unpaid fees or taxes owed or assessed, or it may seek
and all penalties •here^^ may "^ ^ollectioned by court proceedingsew+-aeta;z, which
remedies shall be in addition to m all other existing remedies and penalties.
C. Criminal penalties. Any business licensee who violates or fails to comply with
any of the provisions of this chapter or other lawful rule or ordinance adopted by the
City pursuant thereto, shall upon conviction be punished as described in the general
criminal penalty provisions of KCC 1.01.140.
SECTION 4. - Amendment. Section 15.07.070 of the Kent City Code,
entitled"Maintenance of landscaping," as it pertains to zoning is amended as follows:
Sec. 15.07.070. Maintenance of landscaping.
A. Required. Whenever landscaping is or has been required in accordance with
the provisions of this title or any addition or amendments to this title, or in accordance
with the provisions of any previous code or ordinance of the City, the landscaping shall
be permanently maintained in such a manner as to accomplish the purpose for which it
was initially required.
B. Notice of violation. The planning managerdirestee or his or her designee
designated Eep-esentative is hereby authorized and empowered to notify the owner of
any property required to be landscaped, or the agent, tenant, lessee, or assignee of any
5 Kent City Code Ch. 3.10-
Delinquent Accounts
such owner, that the landscaping is not being adequately maintained and the specific
nature of such failure to maintain. The notice shall specify the date by which the
maintenance must be accomplished, and shall be sent by certified mail, addressed to
the owner at his last known address.
C. Action upon noncompliance.
1. Upon the failure, neglect, or refusal of any owner or agent so notified to
perform the required maintenance within the time specified in the written notice, or
within fifteen (15) days after the date of such notice if the notice is returned to the City
by the post office department because of inability to make delivery thereof, provided
the notice was properly addressed to the last known address of the owner or agent, the
planning manager direeieror his or her desi r�ee is hereby
authorized and empowered to cause the required maintenance to be done and provide
for payment of the cost thereof, with the cost to be collected or taxed against the
property affected as provided in this section.
2. Nothing in this section shall prevent the planning manager teeter-or
his or her designee from taking action as provided in KCC
15 09.090.
D. Charge for maintenance by City to be included in tax bill. When the City has
performed landscape maintenance or has paid for such maintenance, the actual cost
thereof,plus accrued interest at the rate of eight (8)percent per annum from the date of
the completion of work, if not paid by such owner prior thereto, may be charged to the
owner of such property on the next regular tax bill forwarded to such owner by the
City, and if so charged shall be due and payable by the owner at the time of payment of
such bill.
E. Lien for payment of charges. If the full amount due the City is not paid by such
owner within thirty (30) days after performance of the maintenance as provided for in
6 Kent City Code Ch. 3.10—
Delinquent Accounts
subsection (C)of this section, then, in that case, the planning mana erdfreetef or his or
her designee may cause to be recorded in the office of the
supervisor of treasury accounting a sworn statement showing the cost and expense
incurred for the work, the date the work was done, and the legal description of the
property on which the work was done. The recording of such sworn statement shall
constitute a lien and privilege on the property, and shall remain in full force and effect
for the amount due in principal and interest, plus court costs if any, until final payment
has been made. The costs and expenses shall be collected in the manner fixed by law
for the collection of taxes and further shall be subject to a delinquent penalty of eight
(8) percent per annum if the costs and expenses are not paid in full on or before the
date the tax bill upon which the charge appears become delinquent. Sworn statements
recorded in accordance with the provisions of this subsection shall be prima facie
evidence that all legal formalities have been complied with and that the work has been
done properly and satisfactorily, and shall be full notice to every person concerned that
the amount of the statement plus interest constitutes a charge against the property
designated or described in the statement and that the charge is due and collectible as
provided by law.
F. Alternative methods of collection of charges. In addition to or in lieu of the
provisions of subsections (D) and (E) of this section, the City may, at its option and
pursuant to Ch. 19.16 RCW, use a collection agency to collect unpaid charges, interest,
and penalties owed or assessed pursuant to this chapter, or the City may seek collection
'b y . a e ,•' aetien in ^ourt proceedings, which remedies shall be in
addition to all other remedies. of eampeient �sdietten te ee"ee' of any ehafges
fed by the eity r -f o f nten.nee , idea : ..seed.., (G) e
I.V Mll Y4 V� U1V Y14� 1
this seetio.
SECTION S. — Severabiltty. If any one or more section, subsections, or
sentences of this ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision
7 Keys City Code Ch. 3.10—
Delinquent Accounts
shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance and the same
shall remain in full force and effect.
SECTION 6. — Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be
in force thirty(30) days from and after its passage as provided by law.
JIM WHITE, MAYOR
ATTEST:
BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
TOM BRUBAKER, CITY ATTORNEY
PASSED: day of September, 2003.
APPROVED: day of September, 2003.
PUBLISHED: day of September, 2003.
I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No.
passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, and approved by the
Mayor of the City of Kent as hereon indicated.
(SEAL)
BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK
P 1Cw31\0rdinencclDehnquentAcmmu-Ch3 10 dm
8 Kent City Code Cit. 3.10—
Delinquent Accounts
Kent City Council Meeting
Date September 2. 2003
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: CITY CREDIT CARD USE CLARIFICATION RESOLUTION—
ADOPT
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Adoption of Resolution No. clarifying City
credit card use for authorized non-travel related purchases.
The proposed amendment is primarily a housekeeping amendment that clarifies an
employee's ability to use credit cards for authorized non-travel purposes, such as
certain Parks Department recreation programs. City employees will be able to make
small travel and non-travel related purchases simply and easily when appropriate and
authorized by either a top-level manager or department director. Credit cards reduce
costs associated with processing requisitions,purchase orders, and accounts payable,
while creating good business relations with suppliers by speeding up payments.
3. EXHIBITS: Resolution, Finance Director memorandum & copy of Resolution 1200
. 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Operations Committee (3-0)
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
6. EXPENDITURE REOUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 6M
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City
of Kent, Washington, amending Resolution No. 1200 to
clarify use of City credit cards to include authorized non-
travel related purchases.
WHEREAS, on April 18, 1989, the City Council adopted Resolution No.
1200, which allowed for employee use of City credit cards; and
WHEREAS, it is appropriate to amend Resolution No. 1200 to bring it
into conformity with existing City practice by clarifying employee City credit card use
for other non-travel purchases in order to reduce costs associated with processing
requisitions,purchase orders, and accounts payable; NOW THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. — Amendment. Section 5 of Resolution No. 1200 is hereby
amended as follows:
Section 5. As authorized by City department directors, or their
designees, City of Kent employees are authorized to mouse City credit of
the—cardsptfffivant to this in accordance with the terms of(Resolution No.
1200, and any amendment made thereafter;; the credit card agreement
between the City and the bank issuing, the credit card;; the City's policy
manual: and any other policy established by the City or the employee's
department director. City credit cards may be used for travel and non-
travel related purchases, at the discretion of the department director, or his
1 City Credit Cards—Authorized Uses
Amending Resolution No. 1200
or her designee—and a ,,,.,f&vea 4... r,e... orient T,:_ .,...... City
employment shall be verified by display of City identification.
SECTION 2. - Severabthty. If any section, subsection, paragraph,
sentence, clause, or phrase of this resolution is declared unconstitutional or invalid for
any reason, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this
resolution.
SECTION 3. - Ratification Any act consistent with the authority and
prior to the effective date of this resolution is hereby ratified and affirmed.
SECTION 4. - Effective Date. This resolution shall take effect and be in
force immediately upon its passage.
PASSED at a regular open public meeting by the City Council of the City of
Kent, Washington, this day of September,2003.
CONCURRED in by the Mayor of the City of Kent this day of
September, 2003.
JIM WHITE, MAYOR
ATTEST:
BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
TOM BRUBAKER, CITY ATTORNEY
2 City Credit Cards—Authorized Uses
Amending Resolution No. 1200
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of Resolution No.
passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, the day of
September,2003.
BRENDA JACOBER,CITY CLERK
P fil R.tlwIMCVYwsN.d�o.1:IW do
3 City Credit Cards—Authorized Uses
Amending Resolution No. 1200
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
d�a may N"iller, Finance Department
Phone:253-856-5260
Fax 253-856-6255
��E N T55
Address. 220 Fourth Avenue S.
W A S H I N G T O H
Kent,WA 98032-5895
DATE: August 19, 2003
FROM: May Miller, Finance Director
THROUGH: Mike Martin, Chief Administrative Officer
SUBJECT: Amending Resolution No. 1200 to Allow City Credit Cards to be Used for Non-
Travel Related Purchases.
MOTION:
Move to recommend council adoption of the proposed resolution clarifying City
credit card use for authorized non-travel related purchases.
SUMMARY:
Resolution No. 1200 currently authorizes employee use of City credit cards for travel purposes.
The proposed amendment is primarily a housekeeping amendment that clarifies employee use
of credit cards for authorized non-travel purposes, such as certain Parks Department recreation
programs.
When efficient, City employees will be able to make small travel and non-travel related
purchases simply and easily when appropriate and authorized by either a top-level manager or
department director. Credit cards reduce costs associated with processing requisitions,
purchase orders, and accounts payable, while creating good business relations with suppliers by
speeding up payments.
Finance is currently exploring usage of "procurement cards," which would involve an
amendment to the City's employee policy manual. Procurement cards may ultimately replace
City credit cards, which would involve a subsequent request of Council to amend or replace this
resolution.
BUDGET IMPACT:
None.
1
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City
of Kent, Washington, amending Resolution No. 1200 to
clarify use of City credit cards to include authorized non-
travel related purchases.
WHEREAS, on April 18, 1989, the City Council adopted Resolution No.
1200, which allowed for employee use of City credit cards; and
WHEREAS, it is appropriate to amend Resolution No. 1200 to bring it
into conformity with existing City practice by clarifying employee City credit card use
for other non-travel purchases in order to reduce costs associated with processing
requisitions,purchase orders, and accounts payable; NOW THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. —Amendment. Section 5 of Resolution No. 1200 is hereby
amended as follows:
Section 5. As authorized by City department directors, or their
designees, City of Kent employees are authorized to €er-use City credit e€
the-cards in accordance with the terns of rResolution No.
1200, and any amendment made thereafter;; the credit card agreement
between the City and the bank issuing the credit card;; the City's policy
manual; and any other policy established by the City or the employee's
department director. City credit cards maybe used for travel and non-
travel related purchases, at the discretion of the department director, or his
t City Credit Cards—Authorized Uses
Amending Resolution A'o.1200
or her desienee. - - City
employment shall be verified by display of City identification.
SECTION 2 - Severability. If any section, subsection, paragraph,
sentence, clause, or phrase of this resolution is declared unconstitutional or invalid for
any reason, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this
r esolutloll.
SECTION 3. - Rati tcation. Any act consistent with the authority and
prior to the effective date of this resolution is hereby ratified and affirmed.
SECTION 4. - Effective Date. This resolution shall take effect and be in
force immediately upon its passage.
PASSED at a regular open public meeting by the City Council of the City of
Kent, Washing on, this day of August, 2003.
CONCURRED in by the Mayor of the City of Kent this day of
August, 2003.
RM WHITE,MAYOR
ATTEST:
BRENDA JACOBER,CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
TOM BR UBAKER, CITY ATTORNEY
2 City Credit Cards—Authorized Uses
Amending Resolution No.1200
T hereby certify chat rhos is a tnx and correct copy of Resolution b?o.
passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, the day of August,
2003.
DVT W)e rernuFu rpry rr Fuu
is�✓a��.vara...a�, v i
3 City Credit Cards—Authorized Uses
An:ending Resolution No.1100
I�
I
iRESOLUTION NO. O d
A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the
City of Kent, Washington, authorizing City
employee use of Visa/MasterCard credit cards
for travel purposes.
WHEREAS, the City of Kent desires to obtain and use Visa
and MasterCard credit cards ("cards") issued to this corporation
by U.S. Bank of Washington, National Association ("Bank") for use
by officers and employees designated by this corporation.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Mayor of the City of Kent and his
successors in office be directed and empowered in the name of the
corporation to sign Bank's Company Visa/MasterCard Credit Card
Agreement and to apply for the issuance of such number of cards
as, in the judgment of the officer or officers authorized, this
corporation may require, to sign such other application forms and
agreements as Bank may require, and designate persons who may use
a card.
Section 2. The City shall be responsible for and shall
pay Bank for all indebtedness incurred by use of Company cards by
persons designed by this corporation according to such use agreed
to between this corporation and Bank.
Section 3. The duties and responsibilities of this
corporation and Bank with respect to the Company card shall be
governed by Bank's Company Visa/MasterCard Credit Card Agreement,
as amended from time to time, and shall not be affected by the
terms of the card billing statement, cardholder agreement, or
advertising, all of which relate to cards issued to consumers
rather than to corporations.
Section 4. The Bank is authorized to act upon this
resolution until written notice of its revocation is delivered to
Bank.
i, Section 5. City of Kent employees are authorized for use
of the cards pursuant to this resolution, credit card agreement,
nand as approved by Department Directors. City employment shall be
.) verified by display of City identification.
II
i
'j Passed at a regular meqt
Jng of the Cit Council of the
I� City of Kent, Washington this day of 1989.
Concurred in by the Mayor of the City of Kent, this
day of , 1989.
DAN KELLEHER, MAYOR
ATTEST:
MARIE JENSE , CITY CLERK
APPROVED 7 T-O-CORM:
DRISCC ftRNEY
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy
of Resolution No. /aOa_, passed by the City Council of the
City of Kent, Washington, the __�_ day of , 1989.
—�- � =f=== (SEAL)
MARIE JBUSEN, CITY CLERK
7160-250
2
• Kent City Council Meeting
Date September 2, 2003
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: FIRST HALF 2003 BUDGET AMENDMENT ORDINANCE—
ADOPT
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Operations Committee at
their August 19, 2003 meeting, authorization to approve the gross consolidating budget
adjustment ordinance totaling $15,851,033 for budget adjustments made between
January 1, 2003 and June 20, 2003. This ordinance is primarily a housekeeping
adjustment, consolidating individual budget items into one adjusting ordinance.
3. EXHIBITS: Ordinance and Finance Director memorandum
4. RECOMMENDED BY: Operations Committee
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES X
$15,851,033 total budget impact, of this amount $14,119,778 has been previously
approved by Council
6. EXPENDITURE REOUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 6N
I
I
i
ORDINANCE NO.
,I
AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of
Kent,Washington,amending the 2003 budget for adjustments
made from January I, 2003, to June 30, 2003.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT,WASHINGTON,DOES
HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. - Budget Adjustment. The 2003 City budget is amended to
include budget fund adjustments as summarized and set forth in Exhibit "A," which is
attached and incorporated by this reference. Authorized positions are reduced by 33 13
full-time equivalents, and the internal fund loan or investment rate is standardized at the
Washington state pool rate.
SECTION2. -Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior
to the effective date of this resolution is hereby ratified and affirmed.
SECTION 3. - Severabilitti. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of
,this ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent
jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or
constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this ordinance.
1 2003 First Half Budget Adjustment
SECTION 4. -Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in
force five(5)days from and after its passage,approval and publication as provided by law.
I
I
I
JIM WHITE, MAYOR
I
i
ATTEST:
�I
BRENDA JACOBER CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
TOM BRUBAKER, CITY ATTORNEY
PASSED: day of September, 2003.
APPROVED: day of September, 2003.
PUBLISHED: day of September, 2003.
II
I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No. ,passed
by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the
City of Kent as hereon indicated.
(SEAL)
' BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK
P 10410rdo ar c BudgnAdjustm l 2003-1 st dm
2 2003 First Half Budget Adjustment
City of Kent
Budget Adjustment Ordinance
Adjustments January 1, 2003 to June 30, 2003
Exhibit A
Adjustment
Fund Title Ordinance
001 General Fund (12,883)
110 Street Fund 176,441
130 Lodging Tax Fund 0
140 Youth/Teen Fund 0
150 Capital Improvement Fund (447,123)
160 Criminal Justice Fund 83,857
170 Environmental Fund 128,633
180 Housing & Comm Dev Fund 810,000
190 Other Operating Projects Fund 5,388
210 Voted Debt Service Fund 0
220 Non-Voted Debt Service Fund 0
250 Spec Assess Debt Service Fund (45,612)
310 Street Capital Projects Fund 8,391,369
320 Parks Capital Projects Fund (10,293)
330 Other Capital Projects Fund (78,746)
340 Technology Capital Projects 4,082,770
350 Facilities Capital Projects 128,759
410 Water Operating Fund 681,345
440 Sewerage Operating 420,934
480 Golf Operating 47,598
510 Fleet Services Fund 17,957
520 Central Services Fund 124,914
530 Fire Equipment Fund 15,644
540 Facilities Management Fund 187,484
560 Insurance Fund 1,142,597
620 Firefighters Pension Fund 0
680 Agency and Clearing Fund 0
701 Kent Economic Dev Corp 0
Total Gross Budget Change 15,851,033
Less:
Internal Service Funds (1,167,968)
Other Transfers 1,209,078
Internal Transfers (274,645)
Subtotal (233,535)
Total Net Budget Change 15,617,498
- FINANCE
` May Miller, Director
Pharr.253-856-52E0
Fax 253-856-E255
KEN T
W A S H I N G T O N Address: 220 Fourth Avenue S.
Kent,WA 98032-5895
DATE: August 11, 2003
TO: Kent City Council Operations Committee
FROM: Mayene Miller, Finance Division Director
SUBJECT: Consolidating Budget Adjustment ordinance for Adjustments between
January 1, 2003 and June 30, 2003
MOTION:
Recommend Council approve the consolidating budget adjustment ordinance for
adjustments made between January 1, 2003 and June 30, 2003 totaling
$15,8519033.
SUMMARY:
Authorization is requested to approve the gross consolidating budget adjustment
ordinance totaling $15,851,033 for budget adjustments made betvdeen January 1, 2003
and June 30, 2003. This ordinance is primarily a housekeeping adjustment,
consolidating individual budget items into one adjusting ordinance.
BUDGET IMPACT:
$15,851,033 total budget impact. Of this amount, $14,119,778 has been previously
approved by Council.
V ISudget Changes%2003 SCE oticn Sheet June 2003 doc
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of
Kent,Washington,amending the 2003 budget foradjustments
made from January 1, 2003,to June 30, 2003.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT,WASHINGTON,DOES
HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. -Budget Adjustment. The 2003 City budget is amended to
include budget fund adjustments as summarized and set forth in Exhibit "A,"which is
attached and incorporated by this reference. Authorized positions are reduced by 33.13
full-time equivalents, and the internal fund loan or investment rate is standardized at the
Washington state pool rate.
SECTION 2. -Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior
to the effective date of this resolution is hereby ratified and affirmed.
SECTION3. - Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of
this ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent
jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or
constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this ordinance.
1 2003 First KaTBudget Adjustment
07CTJ0A'4. -Effective Date. This ordinance shail take eff�nt and be ini
force five(5)days from and after its passage,approval and publication as provided bylaw.
JIM WHITE, MAYOR
ATTEST:
BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO rORM:
i
I TOM BRUBAKER, CITY ATTORNEY
PASSED: day of , 2003.
APPROVED: day of 2003.
PUBLISHED: day of 2003.
I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No. passed
by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the
City of Kent as hereon indicated.
(SEAL)
BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK
P\C,"InOrdm=t8uaaaAajustm t-2003-In ax
2 2003 First Half Budget Adjustruerr
City of Kent
Budget Adjustment Ordinance
Adjustments January 1, 2003 to June 30, 2003
Exhibit A
Adjustment
Fund Title Ordinance
001 General Fund (12,883)
110 Street Fund 176,441
130 Lodging Tax Fund 0
140 Youthlreen Fund 0
150 Capital Improvement Fund (447,123)
160 Criminal Justice Fund 83,857
170 Environmental Fund 128,633
180 Housing & Comm Dev Fund 810,000
190 Other Operating Projects Fund 5,388
210 Voted Debt Service Fund 0
220 Non-Voted Debt Service Fund 0
250 Spec Assess Debt Service Fund (45,612)
310 Street Capital Projects Fund 8,391,369
320 Parks Capital Projects Fund (10,293)
330 Other Capital Projects Fund (78,746)
340 Technology Capital Projects 4,082,770
350 Facilities Capital Projects 128,759
410 Water Operating Fund 681,345
440 Sewerage Operating 420,934
480 Golf Operating 47,598
510 Fleet Services Fund 17,957
520 Central Services Fund 124,914
530 Fire Equipment Fund 15,644
540 Facilities Management Fund 187,484
560 Insurance Fund 1,142,597
620 Firefighters Pension Fund 0
680 Agency and Clearing Fund 0
701 Kent Economic Dev Corp 0
Total Gross Budget Change 15,851,033
Less:
Internal Service Funds (1,167,968)
Other Transfers 1,209,078
Internal Transfers (274,645)
Subtotal (233,535)
Total Net Budget Change 15,617,498
o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
eama °
La
m
Lp O O O O O 0 0 0 O r C7 O O N M r N O O n
5 M O O O m 01 r O v v O t- m O V
IT (h O `7 Nt M 0 r V 0) O N to V O r
O r (p tz N IZ N (0 CO N O Ld lZ N t0
0) r N �N.. CN r r 0)
M
c = O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O 0
CV eke
O
C"M
m
0 0 v O O O O O O O r M 0 O N M r N 0 O h
Cl) Cl) 0 0 o � 6 r W < a o r c'I o Y
� Cl) CDR v M O r V 0O N 0 , O r
V lV ' N .N-• O N V N N 0 e'�f
O O O O 0 0 0 O r C7 0 O N 0 r N LO O m
m LO O co O m O O t0 O M 0 r w a v O 1- m O 0
dCp N O O LO m O O v v m O r V 6 0 N 0 't O 0
m N r O V r (O r� N N Cq In CD N 6 id f- d N
v N Lo a-
OM' (O O 7 00 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
E N c O LO
N 0 N
.- O O Vf (0 (rj
0 0) r Cl) N
YG�� C Or
CIS
cc
cm
c b
W C (h M C7 Cl) M
cla M p W 0 0 0 0 $ $
N N Q N N O
�-� ODO Q r r Q(
ry
CID
O C O O O
` 0 0 0 0 0 N LL N N r N
O C
y y N
d 0
y N 0 ccC
L x pp0
C� CD
M (D O llJ O U LL U O U Z LL
O O 0 y O to —M
L R - O L Y C O 61
N 'Cr C L > CL f" m 0 a r 0 R C y m m
� - � a> > y 3 v o m 5 a E y °' - d '' ro
CID y d LL g , 0 ° 0 Im v mrn (�
C O t o b o - •0 o m o c 0 a. c� 0 > > - o c i (,3
CL
U ayi m m m O. m O co (� z '� a`> Q m iA U) E r c� tq 10—
a (r"o m t9 a`r " y m` o a> �m ayi Q v� m m m v m
c o m o 0 a o c E E E
a rCL� o d U U Q 0 0 m n a a � t m v 0 ��0. o m
U = U U o R o R R LL a� a R d c c R R o c
U 2 U U ¢ � Z J w 0 0 0 J J N O
Q N
7
4" N O O
c O
'O o 0 0 0 $ 0 o• 0 $ $ $ $ $ w 0
L 0 0 0 0 o a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $o 0 0 0 O 0 o 0 g
d r r r r r ¢ r r r r r r Z r r r r r r r r r
09
N
� N
C
LL W
R Q
d 0) O
a
C 0
W
'O
7
Lv r
O Co O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
O
W N
on 0
= Iq 00 to h O T tD r h to Up O w p O O O w
... 1` 0) O Co O N O V OJ O O O r O O N
c7 W O c7 O act t7 V N O 0) O 0) O tD Wf
T O N v O N t0 p0pQ N tD th O - oc
1` 1` r T Co ' P O T O 0) O N
' ' N ' N N N T w
O 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O_ O O
m
V O O 1` O T CD r n O O O a0 O 0 O O tD
1` O O co O N O sVt 0) O O O 1• O O N
a? 0) O m O w ce) 'tY N O 0) O O) O tD b
T O N y O -f N t0 a0 tV (D C7 CTc i
1` 1` r r O ' A O T to 0) co (Y
v ' ' N ' N N N T to
V co O r O r (D r n O O O co O 0) M O th
m I- O O 00 O N O V O) O O O ), O O) , aV
CO c? 0 O M O co /� It N O O O W CD T N T
O N V O V N t0 aD N (O C V T 1�
a r n T T O n o T Ic) 0) q
N N r r N N Y
O 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O 00 O O C
O N V
Go Go
O T T
40
m T r
W
0 VV
p3{1 O C) O O
p i O It O
LC p N 'O Q 'O N LL
d N O O O C
di d` 0 9 N LL O M LL N E
O Cc O
Go 0)w 'A >
N y C N N p
U N lyG 'O a) N .,, d O N t0 G
C 0 d Cn U j 0 V) O) O CD 'S' b
0 u `O O C LL O V a to C y C
~ 0 d U U O U T pC m O
O
U Cp O lO) N j to
A N mO n 0) dO LL0 0 E N Na E N Ep N cV0 c (D o d VA
rw- U o c o
O m ° O) N G o o y O O a O.
b ( o d cH Egy E
� > j a m • ° 0m > o aC > 0)v �
ae C a m 'A 0 o th = m ga o p ` aLL> R ( J 7 4)
C V N () V cc
N J N J. o�
I-
% o >+ a O
0 > •` C C >
Co a o o a o 0 0 o U. '> $ a g $ o $ $ g o 0
C r T O
a T ¢ T r Lo 0 O O
z z S
E N
E
O C n
9 CL
W A
L E a a
LL y y
~N 'C N d 9
a
N U a a
m m
a a
W o Cl) U)
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
M
W a
OD �
m
O 0 O O O O O OV n O C.)r 0 0 0 0 0 N
LY N V) r 1 Ol 7 V
a0 00 0 m 0 N I
(O [7
O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
m
O Of O O O O O O I� W h O O O O O O N
C N It W 'slNd-
CO= W W 00 (7 LO N h
v
0 M N N O h N O I.- W I, O r 0 0 W 0 (7 h
C O N cor O '? N D] V v V (p V 0p N N f0 co
W (d N d N cl m
xG r (7 m CD
W ,
(3 O N N O N N O O O O O O (0 0) W O m 0
C 0 m IT 0 O R N rl N r r 0 r N N r I7 V V (O V CON (0 N
f) r r r
m W
C
O Ii
.Go�, 0 O O 0 0
� S
q•am
C N ko
C ON � QO NO
d N O NO 00 0 p
C
LL
C 0
d (7 m N N N N 14
(�
N C! r.O
W W i vN
CO
N N N N
C R+C 0 0
0 y0 °m m m pj
E
m m a t N a o CL v E E
C3 !. m °7S' ET EU' ET �
N >. 0
O O OOC p O Q
V
O
�. S $ } m Z i 10 5 W 0 d m U H
LL
`m O @ Q Y C7 co p (A co > > D D
3 '� 0 c o o I' M 0 c7 0 O
0 0 O O COm O 7 G >. T O T T O O T O 1, LL
O` > >. Q O 0) W m @ O N N O O m 0 of
a Q C)Q U a c7 w Q 0 C T J J N J J N N J N J 0
a
T 0
N V N mII V W O
r m r > V V
O O O O C 7 r 0 O a 0 0 0 0
a m 0 0 o m o m o
a` `80 80 8 8 S C o g m cro m g o 0 o c
LL r Z '- '- r r r r z Z Z Z Z p
N N
m O
U 10 0 vj
N O O � � O N
E o 0 c 0 0 0cm
O O m W U. p f7 (7 y y {L
p L U C > U Um tUO LUO
E dU 00
S N l l N
N (n `a> Qvc
o v Y0 CCo y
0W U W 0) n (A (n (o C
N m .0 (� a a -le> 0 ¢ Cp c
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
cc o
is a
m o
r N
cn M
pC O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
m
m
O� coO CO O O O O O O O O O O O O O
C n V) N
_ M N
V I ti
O w to V) M Opp O O Lf) It t0 N O O O _N 0 co
O co
coo N M tD 0 O O ( CDO 0 0 co O r'>
N N 0 n (D .N- a to rn H
r r O r ccPl
OD
p C14OOCIA ON O OO ry co O M
on Cl) N OOf O n co 0 G .N•-_ C emu}) N u6
o p 9
O O C O O O O U.
a w QNQ 8 .n
�p_Q N co N N N N > er O It d
d '••� M N 3 0 9 N N N N a O O O tL
trd c LL c E c a
w y w cTi u cTi c>i o w C
` U m ` N C a; GI N N N co cm cm c w O m
c 0 £ m a c ad E m u $
c
►�- 0` 0 Uccc
v :xO O
dC-4C FL
(D
m
O
tm V•a>� UtmD aeo rC U3 ' % GO O S ,
'mu N O E C. 0. . u �cv
tdgo
O
0 w Comm cN
G m0 tw
0 c O m O v) 0 J p C
.2 a o E c Fa0
0 0 c U U U a
o > o > ; tD m m tD .0 0) tL (D w
n = 0) /R N Vl mcmmm to � m m to m m E
' M a >c = $ . o > c Uo
iS IX < 0 (aN
W Uc c
n Q U> Q U> >
a m .0 v �+
>� 0 >, c >,
N m 'j C y LL yy m
7 > M y O O n M t+ CD N tD O > b
> O C Or G 0 0 U. > O O` O N O O u > O O O 6 O
d r 6 r ., r r > m O 0. O O O O 0 o o O G o
9 r 4 �- 0 � n 01 .. 0 a O O N N '^ : O 0 o a o
c a a z r r o a m ¢ m m m m ° M > > > Q > $
E M p
LL M a
Ecm
c o U c °) CL N
aci '
«+ � n U L
E ° ¢
c O 0 a L
op r) O QQ �A Co nu0
it o
9 W d tm = > 7 O L } Q E cm 0
N m c G
Er c m a m U Y LL b c
m y = C� 6 6 L U o tca < F=
h D^ m m m mmm U = ¢
and c `m O D DtoO to >
Q-' r to U U UX U r W U J m
8
0 0
cc
C N N
(o a0
Ld b
v a
c o 0
a�
m
N N
CI
p t0 [O
Cw0 v a
m N N
60 co ,-t0 1D
mC
xG
W
O O
F3
a
m
C
C 7
(7 LL
W N O a
d•m O O f
C 0. N CO
O .+
ems. a
m
0
c a
o a
u a
� a
v Q
m
� u
c
uc o N
u o o
Q �
w a 0
v
c a
U. T
N O
u C O
2 > to
N ` Cl
N a N O
a �
07 H
O N
a
a in
a Sm
to
Q Q
u �
m
C. O. c
W �
N
Li N
o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
e
� ar
C O O o O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
m
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0
Cl O co ap pp O O O O LO 0 N N O O O co O
co 0 i0 N 0) (O O O S O O 0 N LO O (D r N O
oe C) N 7 O C` O Cl) LO O r� O N (D N m m 0 C') O 0
N cl M c Oi cli N O C N O M 'V' CD v
V) O M n 00 0 M M N NM N
}� 0) O M
Wee N �
oO O (D
O N V• 03 N O M t00 O N m N co r) O 0CNO O
(V coi cri O W M N O a- N O sr V) V C6 M
O M n co
p M co) toN C N
(N
'a
C
O O O O
O � O N '0
.��- O 7
6 4 O O O .a N LL
a C
C w
N
O
clid a s a a s
`= N C O a C 0 0) 0 0) 0) O
m L r o c 0 > > > a o a
c (a U m aci aci m c m
0 N N N 0 v v v C v a o 7 v c7 ,a 0>1 w N a>i d
V V a a D� rn 0) 0) CD rn rn rn rn
T "" " C N N N N m N N N N N N m 07 � O.
co a m m m :. d yk # it at at # Yt 4k # it C c c c c c Q
>o m m La a a a a i a a a a a a 06 v v'a
m v
a� D w w w w o w w w w w w a a a) a a a a a
a H H F- U H N w 0 0 � N U w w 0 V) w T Q d Q d d U
T
C N O
7 O 0) M M OD> p ch N O N N M M M (l
LL O o 0) e- O S e- C) Cl) ClW) 1- CD 0 r 1
:R dO O tD 0 0 0 0 �-- O O o 0 0 (O O O. O O O 0 0
O O O O. O O O O o O O O O O 0 0 O O n
e Y C
IL l0 @ > N
C N N LY Ci w , , d N p
a 7 O C 0 O 0 O O C C L" O rn
a N 4) «. N ;0 d) a s 1N (N n 0 N >
a LO Y) (4 V7
.. O N d >' > m >. O a O O N N
c U j ° °c m ° U U U in .w D p
m 016. N m d O> ,mac t E 0' - d c EED m 0 0 3 °y) E `0 > 0 ((Ov o 0
N N 0)m c vJ — N CD :° M -kmM U N N O)w O O 0) U _m N 0 07
�pJ 0) O L d1 �[f O d L d N O L N L L C CD.- 0) , cNry ¢ O 0 C t 0 �cli cm Lq
(i Cq -Oj-J N M CO :3 D. Q (n 05 E d Y N N N N J S(A
0 0 0 Co 0 0 0 0 •-
0
n
m m
IL
o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
m
C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
a
W
Co0 rn f, m o a I to
oe , on , M 0 o M
c ri uS C .�
co
co
o rn o o I 0)
r� ch co
0 D) 0
crs
v ri co
n
m
� 60 c
Sm
.S
p LL
L 7
G
�. C. d
L O
C a
a a a a a a s 3
> > > > > > >
u u 0 v v U V
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
a v v 'D -0 'a v v
ra�J Q Q Q Q Q Q Q
t n n co rn rn
0 0 0 0 0 0 tD
3
0 0 0 0 0
0 0) 0) 0) 0)
N
o wn
0) 0 N
C � N
y a "C C Ord a 7
O N O O
h a U 6 m G
E N O : („) J a
°a fD ,= 1 'O
d
� Q CO
Q Q U N N N
ram.
� � �
CO) w O N
C N N tD N 0 OIT W
W I N N J� N
I =d
o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
co
o
,q
C O O O O O O O O o O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
O O O O
m
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N V V O O r n r O O N O O O N O N O w O N O)
e� o M l0 0 0 0 O O) O N O O)
M N M O O W O N O co v O O O O O O O O O M
M ( n v )n aD u� 00 < O !O to r O O O 00 O (3D u) (D r CO r
M n D1 r M e- )O r V' M 10 M )n r r to
x r N r
ppWgq � �
m N CD 7 O O r n r 0 0) O N O O O N O N O 10 O N O)
3 'a CD M M O It 4O 0 O O O) O M �0 O O OD O m O n O O
ch N M r 0 It n 0 Of O N O CO R 0 0 0 0 0 O CD O O
Cl) tD r V W ai )0 co q 100 K) C r O O O aO o 00 O t0 r C
m r 9 M )n v M 10 r r )0 sF
C N r
i
M Cl) Cl) M M M M M Cl) M M N
O O O O O O O O O O O p O
y o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O
N Q Q N Q Q Q
y r 10 r Y7 CO r O )O r er )O O] O
N r N r r N r N O r N '- N r N N M N N N M N
p ' 1 O O O O O C) Q O O O
e' V r Ir M r )0 a r t7 O O O �- 0 0 r O vO O O O
d O O O O O O O O O O O N N N r N N r N N N N N
C C
7
OC c ` N N N
)a M N a)
N 0 U U Y U U 10
U �p L a1 d N 61 U a) ? U 0
N L U O Q .0 O J a) O 0 of m 0 a)
0 a.
•a �> m> Hm oO oO d � � m LL J V a D 0 0 O (D O OC m N a) Z N .y Z 7a,
C
0 m m m o m 0 $ >u °
O n a c 2, •_ oa): a m
0 0 0 � U a m v .0 cx� y >
W J J w O O .J a a7 J O J .- o
C C a s C U C } C •C — C al 0 - 7 t `y a) a
o m ai 3 m aci m is Q aa)i U ai p m o a10i U 4)) 0 0 0)) 3 a)' 0 A y
Y� a l). U. Y Y Y lL Z LL Y LL U
14 CL
C T V O
7 O M M v N N n M O OD M )O > co O R )O a0 a0 r n N N m O �d h
0 0 0 0 0 0 18O `8 0 0 ° o 0 0 0 0 "d o [qp 0 0 0 0 CL (pp
LL 0 O O O 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 O. O O o O O O O O O O O O +� O
0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N O. N N N N N N N N N N N O) O N
a a a n. n. a s a a a a. a Q a a a n, a a a a a a a a z a o
0 o v D N
a) > c c IL m
m v u V) L E v c o c c LL O N
W LU O C U) N y a 7 O y a1 N m N n
a3 U U O O L N x a F'- a) a) 0.
O N
U CL
a n 'O a a m 7 a7 x N d = N fO lU6 N LU
"E to` N E lL a) m .0 8 a 7 a U 3 ) 0 N y aC 0 0 " Y
m ac) m •o v °) c a ami O `�° m 0) d v d `a a a c 0 m` o
IL
0 0 a) y r d w } c p U m m a o o } mCL
'O O L� C C C Y «�. [V N @ y a) a N U 3 N L L N C N
Lt.. 0 (L x a= U) Y Y F-- a z w w nn m° cn 0 N ¢ c:- w �' w Y d w
cc
m �
m
IL
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
m
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
ei
sa
o rn o to O 0 O n
m of o 0 oo It o n n of $ o U)i
Go N o 0 ao P. O n P. rn o LO N i.
r• ON O N NLO
co OD N
0 O .-
v v
m o c00 m a o o n LO 1 o Cn
N O M N t� 0 n N Of iO N A
O O O Cp O N N (D Q to Ep
7� e O N n 0 co O N 4) CV
C O, O O O
a v
� m
W
CCS c C N U O
p7 LL cl O 0
L LL N v 0Oi
CL
c !3
t) 3 Ci O IL C G
Q) d 0 7
•p C LL •0 O isv LL a
C C
IL p• ,F m w �
U a
a v m
a t 0 t d d m t > d o U
A p Df C « m > p « p m > >
U ` o v o V 7 0 O N U U a>
0 O` d CO t7 O M •V N c O tf (Y N NIm
R N N o Of C C ) ) •V
a 0 0 C p 7 N 41 7 0 j j R
G$: O O LL >� > .� O CO U L 007 N LL
i7 O ►. d Co O 'C °m a 0 0 p
Y
— LI)` > c � > a
y c - u > >
0 2 0 0 c0c
0
c o 0
>a C c CL
OO p p. L
p p c
v v c o r o
C 0) Cl) Co > d > 0 13 •F.
O. N N O N D. CL O. N O N O M N O N N N
O Q Z Q F Z F d Q LL Z LL LL LL 8
n
o
w >
U N coCD m o
a 0 > o E
c 0 ° to 0 m <
a .0 LL
IL d L C C C L >. L E _w O v
tl od C
O O O 0 p H N
�C O F CD 0) c 0 v)
0
�0.. N O LL 0 > — —
(1) fn C C C V > p =
n O C C d O U O C >, N
CC.) Y Y Calf F H U O IX U W J
o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
`o
� c
09 p
Lai ce) O COO (00 N a) O O O O ~O
CD O fl Co CO r p
.4' CD O N CD M Yf
ti M r r
' ' r
C O O O O O O O O O O O
` o c00
Cl)c 0 coo n 0 0 0 o CD
co O r CO CD r p
n CO Ld N CO Ch 9
u, Col r r
r
C7 O O O O O O O O O O
o o c O EDD CO !- M O LO h .--
O CO r CO 7 M
m n as O N CO C, g r g
C� � [OD
O O O O O O O O O OD Co
Cn t` r M
OD a M
co r co
b in
to
O th
O
d 2 N
G =
O ti N LL
C
d C
`m w v v v e
c w N a+ > i > a
o a �, c N 8 0
o _ w c
p ¢ C m A U a
m m 0 a m o m m m 3
c c U c c m aci aci m
U a V y E m toCp F
c > > v
cc o c U) o
� !L 0 0-
yG p N a i. i. O >cq °. 7 v a
W fl, � V U y� J O J N J Q Q Q
Q � 7
N
T V p
m >
d N> O> ^
p
C pp O p O p NG>1
N N
S
CL v Q v 2 V `f v -v v > ? N
o �
c a
Mill. ® o rn
CL
0 U
O y
y o 4
3 c m
0
o _
u
m
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
c 0
ee
ev
m �
a
C � M 0 00 O O O O O O O O N (OD N r O N O O O O O O
LL t-- 0 r O M 0 w O t,
tto N 0) c'7 f0 00 Cp
I r
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
m
LO M 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0N 0 00 N 0 0 O O O O
C f` 0) r O CM 0 w O N
CO N Cl) CO O M (0 N O CO
w (0 N O
O O O O CO M r O 0 40 O co O O CD M O CD r O M O 0 n
m 0 Cl) (O O O V' N O O (D O (0 N CO N r O N r CO r O O M
N n W r 0 r O M O O 0) r M Cl) ' 0 CO 0 th N (O v 0 N r
mN M CO O Of CO r N C 0) CO CO M CD N O tD O r
Q C0 N O r N N M (0 r O 0) O 7 O r O
N r r e
O O 0 0 O M r 0 0 (0 O O O O O O O O r 0 M Q O t`
O '�T N O O 0 [O 000 r CO O M
M O O 0r m N (O 7 O N r
m 01 CO r M O 0) 0 CD O
m N N M 0 r N 0 O O
m
O W
_ Cl) Cl) N N N N N N
O O O O O O O 0
mo
C O 0 O O
G N C� 1 O O M C) r
Q ch. O 0 N O r r
6d C
!2 ch
W C C N
N
H
dNuuN0O CL 0)C > ? > >
OG
CD U
G
O O O U L C N C U N U d
U ` 0)) O cc U O C) U >+ C N 0 = N N
w
N m d N to O o) a C d m O U N N N G d N
C N N LL U M y ` ti MU U LL1 O C N 0 0 N 0 CC) N
V m a = m o (M C7 a m OL a>i a>i a>i a>i
Z^
>, a s a 7 a N N V c j m 0 > m CL Q: a
W o) Q vt 0 4R Q g F- y > to c m m m m m Fa m
m c m u 0 0 Q Q m O O U ° O N 0 0 0 0 0 0
C a a3i C A W c W O W N >� a°i a (mot Co O O m y a D a v
d M (0 00 (n W co 0 U' > R T J O J N U J Q Q Q U Q Q
d a
co
>` v 0
co
0 O Q C07 M CO') m M M CO) M CO M r
O O
> O 0 O O O O O O O O O (D d 7 CD r l0 r
N C. 0 d O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .+
a` v ¢ v v o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o z° g v v v o 0 0 0 o
O C E C N
Y) O O N
a a
d 05 C C c Y
tT N N N
O m (0 lO M 00 N CM M N 0
++ C m 0 m U U C C L Y C y Q
a) 0 Q O O O 0 0 J mto C .L. J U
-2 q 1 0 O 1 O C
�_ N N 2 2 d E E O y d ~ N C O C O
y U N O O O 0 0 O N W � O� �y� 0)
C O O co N N N N N O+ vOi N y y U m 12 O 0Oi =
e O 0 W N (4 O O 3 L O t0
Lm 3 CO J J > > J J 2 CL w �:x c 2 a W
O O 6 0 0 Cl o O 0 0 0 0 O
W 0
N_
m
C C O O N N O ems- p CV) Lf)V n a0 n
Lil Lc) r 0 < O r- LO t0 N 001
N N N oD 01 r O < r
< <
O0
M O O N Do w N O O tMO toN w
h n to < O n fD Of
N N N tb 01 f t7D < ►,
GD < <
a r n N co to cc O M to tr O N
M U) N N N O 01 O t0 IT n N N
0) 0) LO cC) n 0) h O Ih to t0 Of
N N < N N O n f` O a-
IL
M n n O O O 14 O O O O O O
Go � a
ai tGci
7m N N N
4Y.
Cp
O
O O
Lo V
min Cl) LO
m b N
iC 4 > > O
S -C LL U- ,C N C
tti C C 7
m o- to OI y LL
b ► W C ► N m
CI O
R ► c N a .. _ toc
to rn c c H O o ► c y to m
Cc m > > > am o d °> > m
(9 a. o LL
m o m m v o ► F V c 0 m�
H a o o a : cx
E F Q. a m I-°
cc E a a e c _ > > h ? c
xa 3 c o 06 .mc i, o a o i. i, r
W V U U T O J N V U N J J O
v O O
> r m > 2
a o C14 o o g o c g a o $ g
Q U- LL Z v v v Q to z n nW) n $
� N
LL tt1
CI N
C
A t) pOp
► O
CD8d L m m N
axi d
(9 Em Em LL
o-0 oa
012 U m
w 40
w o a o a
S
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CD 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
m m
a
P rn N 00 N IV 0 O O O D1 .- O 0
N I h O aD Of O CO I
M a00 h N CD to N
lh
C O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
00
rC 00) 0 t, 00 r O O O O O O) OD co N
p N h O co Ol O M 7
cc m Go I cry OOD N O v
m 00 � LO O co 0 n r Y V f- IT h 0) co V
C w go
NW) ' r O t0 CD f0 0 co N m co
m 00 Cl) OW O N L r Ln 1 r-
O M co
O O O O O O O �f CO 0 N O O O
m (D ,ttO N N LA O
r r � ^ ^ O
cla
on
mm LL
c V O O C C
O m
d LL 3 .O N N LL E
O M LL C m
U d V N C w m
m NC Lp m ; $ .. Cm
m
m m
U ' m0
C � O
O a 2 N `
:AW7
v y
au�i N4 O c �ai O. Em = m O U N m cm�t
LL
0 c C c a c a _
c 0� > Ey m
m Uom ccc > > D_ > 0
no `m M o aoo c m a d o Q
a t > o
T J coO N ~ .JJ C V W Q U T O J N
Fa
0 c a 0
o v o
> m '>
pppO pppp pppp pp pp po M
O 3 >
O N m
= O N N N N N N a O N C C O O O +" 0 0 0
LL z W, to z E a LL LL z o
m LL m N
m rn u
vi
rz
m F' 0 to
O
N q G l0 N c
A C N m 0 Q
•'' m 7 =. C jy m
C U
S m ► ca v w c
C V ILL n
to G m O
O d
W N N LL 1% d Q
.�-
CCC o
� V
OO
p � N r r W W O r W r N O N N O M r A
W 00W W Cf r N MO O r (h M V N 'In r W W A co
N N � N V 0! N � N N N � /+! W
fV C,4 r W r r to (V N W) 1+1
Oa
O O O O 0 O O O O O O O
O to O V N r r W W O r W *^ N o N L0 0 M r A
1n r W W V N M W O r M 1r) N V Ln r W W A 10
r� N N sr N V r M W N r O V N ' N N 'g M co
N N L r r Ld N N 10 M
V N 01
Of
0 0 O V N r r W W O r Co r N W N 1n O (0) A M
C! 1n r W W V N (�7 N O r M 1n N V (0 LO r W CO 01 M
C O N N V N V r 0) W N 0) V N 01 N N V In O
m O N N r L e- Y6 N 1� Na
G (p � V IA
CA
O r '
LLI � r N
O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 co O O O O CO
00 0 co m o
00 A co a
co Wo
C r O a-
'' W
m
r
� a
DO uh.
20,
Q0
S zo
S
a
C e.
to W W to M1 C
N N N N N LL
tolb Vl MJ
d N N Of
C VI C C w C Ml C W E-
a) O T A 0 O N N O >,
C N N U N O N 0 N m N U l0 C C N U (0 7
O (D 7 0- G. y 3 0 N � a. N N N � a 0
v 0 E E � c
V o c I o c °� c o c m 0 0 o c
E m n m O. m O. c O. lC0
0 aM in (n � in 2 c w D � co cn � C � � Cl) co
= � � 2 2 2
0 o M o 0 0 0 M 0 M o M 0 0 o a) 0 Cl) 0 0
m mo m m m ms mo mo m m m - mo m m
T -1 N J J J -i N J N J N J J -1 O -1 N J J
fA
0
O
m
a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
�f+pl
Z W) o to Lo W) b is N 10 N iD 1n 10 0 0 0 0 10 0
N
D W
C N
y
LL �
+.1 d
c hto
A
G. C
O
co
Li 10
Date: August 11, 2003
To: Operations Committee
From: Mayene Miller, Finance Division Director
Subject: Consolidating Budget Adjustment Ordinance for Adjustments between
January 1, 2003 and June 30, 2003
Authorization is requested to approve the gross consolidating budget adjustment
ordinance totaling $15,851,033 for budget adjustments made between January 1, 2003
and June 30, 2003. This ordinance is primarily a housekeeping adjustment,
consolidating individual budget items into one adjusting ordinance.
Please note that $14,119,778 has been previously approved by Council in current or
prior years, as reflected in Council minutes. $8,391,369 of this amount is for Street
Capital projects, including a $5,003,250 TIB grant for the 220-228th Corridor and
$1,551 ,270 in SEPA mitigation budgets. Also included is the budget for the Police
Technology project as approved in Tech Plan 11.
The balance of$1,731,255 that was not previously approved by Council needs to be
approved to be in compliance with the State Auditor's requirements. Of this amount,
$1,407,511 is for operations and $323,744 for capital projects as explained below
Operating Adjustments - $1,407,511
• $691,407 citywide net reduction as a result of layoffs. Layoff salary reductions of
$1,183,377 are partially offset by increases of$320,358 for related unemployment
costs and $171,612 for severance packages. 33.98 FTE's were deleted.
• $85,051 decrease, primarily due to several departmental one-time only reductions.
• Health Insurance Fund increase of$1,001,808, as well as the insurance allocations
from department budgets of$757,435 in the General Fund and $242,218 in other
funds. The insurance fund portion and the department portion equal a $2,001,461
total increase.
C $180,000 correcting transfer from the Central Services Fund to the Capital
Improvement Fund.
• $2,508 voluntary reallocation of councilmember salaries to Drinking Driver Task
Force ($1,623) and Fire Defibrillator Unit ($885). No additional expenditures are
involved; these are transfers to the respective programs.
Capital Project Adjustments - $323,744
• $600,000 reduction to eliminate capital project budgets that were carried over in
error.
• Authorize the spending of additional project revenues received totaling $923,744:
• 99,277 in Street Capital projects, including $94,076 of allocated interest and
$5,201 for the sale of plans and maps. Primary projects include RTA Access
Improvements, Kent Station, 196 h Corridor and 228'" Corridor.
• $1,349 interest allocated to East Hill Park Expansion project.
$15,644 interest allocated to Fire Apparatus Replacement project.
• $82,770 allocated to Tech Plan I including 1,05 b3!pv-.r= trnsfrr_r!W ? .--
a _
from closed technology projects, $23,503 from the sale of outdated equipment
and $8,231 in data processing services
o $5,716 in Facilities projects, including $5,202 interest allocated to East Hill
Facility Land project and $514 from the sale of plans and maps to City Hall
Seismic Improvements.
• $566,338 in Water projects, including $564,850 interest allocated to Tacoma
Intertie and $1,488 from the sale of plans and maps to Corrosion Control and
Well Head Protection.
• $2,650 in Sewerage projects from the sale of maps and plans.
• $150,000 in bond allocation for renovation projects.
Also included is the recognition of.75 FTE Project Director one-year grant position
previously approved in March as part of the Safe Havens grant and the increase of a
Human Resource Manager from 90% to 100%, or a .10 FTE increase. The HR position
does not require a monetary budget change as the cost is covered in other unexpended
budget lines.
Exhibit A shows the total adjustments by fund through June 30, 2003. Also attached is
a detailed listing of these adjustments by fund, with Council authorization dates for the
amounts previously approved.
Council Action:
Approve the consolidating budget adjustment ordinance for adjustments made between
January 1, 2003 and June 30, 2003 totaling $15,851,033.
Kent City Council Meeting
Date September 2. 2003
Category Other Business
1. SUBJECT: QWEST CONDITIONAL USE APPEAL-CLOSED RECORD
HEARING (#CE-2001-3)
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: This is a closed record appeal hearing of the decision
on remand of the hearing examiner approving a conditional use permit for Qwest. The
Hearing Examiner's Decision on Remand was issued on May 10, 2002.
3. EXHIBITS: A complete copy of the Hearing Examiner's record, Appellants'
request for appeal, and briefs received August 18, 2003, were provided to
• Councilmembers
4. RECOMMENDED BY: Hearing Examiner
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
6. EXPENDITURE REOUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
0.�.-a-..�,w� d e t�o r on I u •1 InQ
to the Hearing Examiner'spay 10, 2002, .
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 7A
AAA-
n-6
Kent City Council Meeting
Date September 2, 2003
Category Bids
1. SUBJECT: PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH HOV LANES— SOUTH PHASE—
S. 272ND STREET TO S. 252ND STREET—JOINT UTILITY
TRENCH
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: The bid opening for this project was held on
August 19, 2003 with three bids received. The low bid was submitted by Pilchuck
Diversified Services in the amount of$1,136,744.30. The Engineer's estimate was
$1,196,128.38. The Public Works Director recommends awarding this contract to
Pilchuck Diversified Services.
3. EXHIBITS: Public Works Director's memorandum
4. RECOMMENDED BY:
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $1,136,744.30
SOURCE OF FUNDS: R90614
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
,,pp ��
Councilmember l�altA moves, Councilmember seconds
that Pacific Highway South HOV Lanes— South Phase— S. 272nd St. to S. 252nd St.
Joint Utility Trench contract be awarded to Pilchuck Diversified Services for the low
bid amount of$1,136,744.30.
DISCUSSION: _
ACTION: MC
Council Agenda
Item No. 8A
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Don E Wickstrom, P E Public Works Director
.40 Phone 253-856-5500
K E N T Fax 253-856-6500 11147
WASMINGTON Address 220 Fourth Avenue S
Kent,WA 98032-5895
DATE: September 2, 2003
TO: Mayor White and Kent City Council
FROM: Don Wickstrom, Public Works Director.d
SUBJECT: Pacific Highway S HOV Lanes S 272nd — S 252 d Joint Utility Trench
SUMMARY: Bid opening for this project was held on August 19 with three bids received. The
lowest bid was submitted by Pilchuck Diversified Services in the amount of S1,136,744.30. The
Engineer's estimate was $1,196,128.38. The Public Works Director recommends awarding this
contract to Pilchuck Diversified Services.
Bid Summary
Pilchuck Diversified Services $1,136,744.30
Pivetta Brothers Construction, Inc $1,183,918.00
Frank Coluccio Consturction Co. $1,372,471 50
Engineer's Estimate $1,196,128.38
BUDGET IMPACT: No Unbudgeted Fiscal/Personnel Impact
MOTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds that
the Pacific Highway S HOV Lanes S 272"d — S 252"d Joint Utility Trench contract be awarded to
Pilchuck Diversified Services for the low bid amount of$1,136,744.30.
Mayor White and Kent City Council Poe Hwy S HOV Lanes S 272nd—S 252n°Joint Utility Trench-Award Bid
September 2,2003
1
Kent City Council Meeting
Date September 2, 2003
Category Bids
1. SUBJECT: WATER TREATMENT CHEMICAL SUPPLY FOR 2003-2004-
SODIUM FLUORIDE
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: The bid opening for this project was held on
August 18, 2003 with four bids received. The low bid was submitted by Cascade
Columbia Distribution Company in the amount of$29,180.16. The Engineer's estimate
was $30,000.00. The Public Works Director recommends awarding this contract to
Cascade Columbia Distribution Company.
3. EXHIBITS: Public Works Director's memorandum
4. RECOMMENDED BY:
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $29,180.16
SOURCE OF FUNDS: Water Operating Funds
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember t�,A4� moves, Councilmember seconds
that the Water Treatment Chemical Supply for 2003-2004 Sodium Fluoride contract be
awarded to Cascade Columbia Distribution Company for the low bid amount of
$2%180.16.
DISCUSSION:
ACTION: ry� -
Council Agenda
Item No. 8B
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Don E. Wickstrom, P.E. Public Works Director
Phone 253-856-5500
Fax 253-856-6500
K E N T
W A S H I N G T O N Address. 220 Fourth Avenue S.
Kent,WA 98032-5895
DATE: September 2, 2003
TO: Mayor White and Kent City Council
FROM: Don Wickstrom, Public Works Director CMV
SUBJECT: Water Treatment Chemical Supply for 2003-2004
Sodium Fluoride, Bid Item#6
SUMMARY: Bid opening for this project was held on August 18, 2003 with four bids received.
The lowest bid was submitted by Cascade Columbia Distribution Company in the amount of
$29,180.16. The Engineer's estimate was $30,000.00. The Public Works Director recommends
awarding this contract to Cascade Columbia Distribution Company.
Bid Summary
Cascade Columbia Distribution Company $29,180.16
Solvay Fluorides $29,212.80
Univar $31,987 20
JLM Industries, Inc. $39,168.00
Engineer's Estimate $30,000.00
BUDGET IMPACT: No Unbudgeted Fiscal/Personnel Impact
MOTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds that
the Water Treatment Chemical Supply for 2003-2004 - Sodium Fluoride, Bid Item #6 contract be
awarded to Cascade Columbia Distribution Company for the low bid amount of$29,180 16
Mayor White and Kent City Council Water Treatment Chemical Supply-Award Bid
September 2,2003
1
REPORTS FROM STANDING COMMITTEES AND STAFF
A. COUNCIL PRESIDENT
B. OPERATIONS COMMITTEE
C. PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE l 4/
D. PUBLIC WORKS
• E. PLANNING COMMITTEE LQJ Ut. �"��� C�n
3
F. PARKS COMMITTEE 4
G. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS ow afx
REPORTS FROM SPECIAL COMMITTEES
•
CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS
A.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
A) Pending Litigation
B) Land Acquisition
•
ACTION AFTER EXECUTIVE SESSION
A)