HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Meeting - Council - Agenda - 08/05/2003 -Tel *Ll I 10D
Now.&
ty5 *0,00 p .m-.
{
ari
City of Kent
City Council Meeting
Agenda
August 5, 2003
Mayor Jim White
Councilmembers
Judy Woods, Council President
Tim Clark Julie Peterson
Connie Epperly Bruce White
Leona Orr Rico Yingling
KENT
WAS H INGTON
City Clerk's Office
SUMMARY AGENDA
KENT CITY COUNCIL MEETING
K E N T August 5, 2003
x W A S N I N 6 T O N Council Chambers
5X..00pm
MAYOR Jun White COUNCILMEMBERS Judy Woods, President
Tim Clark Connie Epperly Leona Orr
Julie Peterson Bruce White Rico Yingling
+«r*+*»r•s�*►�*s****+r*******�**r+s**rrrs•*s*•**sss***rr*r*r�:+**x**rrs**s�*rr�:•
1 CALL TO ORDERIFLAG SALUTE
2 ROLL CALL
3 CHANGES TO AGENDA
A FROM COUNCIL,ADMINISTRATION, OR STAFF 3
B FROM THE PUBLIC � 1
4. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
A Employee of the Month 7'vm
B Introduction of Appointees
5 PUBLIC HEARINGS
None
6 CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Minutes of Previous Meeting—Approve
B Payment of Bills—Approve L
C. LID 355, SE 216th& 104th Place SE Sanitary Sewers, Ordinance—Adopt
D 2002 Water System/Water Conservation Potential Assessment Amending
Ordinance—Adopt 3 -"k
E. Selboume Lane Final Plat—Approve
F King County Countywide Planning Policies Amendments Ratification
Resolution—Adopt 1 !�('
G. City of Auburn Home Repair Agreement Renewal—Authorize
H. Century 21 Donation—Accept and Amend Budget
I. Turnkey Park, Fee-In-Lieu of Funds—Accept and Amend Budget
J 2003 Tree Education Program Donation—Accept and Amend Budget
K. Human Services Commission Appointment—Confirm
L. Counul A-b:wce C PeWsm) - A-ppv-bwd
7 OTHER BUSINESS
A. State Energy Project Financing Agreement with State Treasurer, Ordinance—
Adopt
8 BIDS
A. 2003 Traffic Striping
B. Alvord Avenue N Water Main Replacement
C 101st Avenue SE & SE 256th St. Traffic Signal Revision
D. Boeing and Mill Creeks Restoration Improvements
(continued next page)
SUMMARY AGENDA CONTINUED
9 REPORTS FROM STANDING COMMITTEES AND STAFF
10 REPORTS FROM SPECIAL COMMITTEES II
11 CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS {}, 0 i 71 ZP0 �cIR U2i�
12 EXECUTIVE SESSION Q
A. Property Acquisition(2)
B. Potential Litigation(2)
13 ACTION AFTER EXECUTIVE SESSION
14 ADJOURNMENT
NOTE A copy of the full agenda packet is available for perusal in the City Clerk's Office and the
Kent Library. The Agenda Summary page is on the City of Kent web site at
www.ci.kent.wa.us.
An explanation of the agenda format is given on the back of this page.
Any person requiring a disability accommodation should contact the City Clerk's Office in advance at
(253) 856-5725. For TDD relay service call the Washington Telecommunications Relay Service at
1-800-833-6388.
CHANGES TO THE AGENDA
Citizens wishing to address the Council will, at this time, make known the subject of
interest, so all may be properly heard
A) FROM COUNCIL, ADMINISTRATION, OR STAFF
B) FROM THE PUBLIC
PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
A) EMPLOYEE OF THE MONTH
B) INTRODUCTION OF APPOINTEES
•
CONSENT CALENDAR
6. City Council Action: I, IV -�, (n
Councilmember A zb moves, Councilmember —
seconds to approve Consent Calendar Items A through ' ,w&-h
Discussion N
Action m
6A. Approval of Minutes.
Approval of the minutes of the regular Council meeting of July 15, 2003.
6B Approval of Bills.
Approval of payment of the bills received through July 15 and paid on July 15 after
auditing by the Operations Committee on July 15, 2003.
• Anyroval of checks issued for vouchers:
Date Check Numbers Amount
7/15/03 Wire 1461-1471 $1,365,894.83
7/15/03 Prepays & 550610 1,331,772 77
7/15/03 Regular 551151 579,273 47
$3,276,941 07
Approval of checks issued for payroll for June 16, 2003 and paid on July 3, 2003:
Date Check Numbers Amount
6/26/03 Interim Checks 271143 $ 32.20
$ 32.20
7/3/03 Checks 271144-271438 $ 256,844.29
. 7/3/03 Advices 150031-150709 1,308,901.39
$1,565,745.68
Council Agenda
Item No. 6 A-B
•
K E N T Kent City Council Meeting
WASHINGTON July 15, 2003
The regular meeting of the Kent City Council was called to order at 7 00 p in by Mayor White.
Councilmembers present Clark, Epperly, Orr, Peterson, White, and Woods Councilmember
Yingling was excused from the meeting Approximately 85 people were in attendance
CHANGES TO AGENDA
A From Council (CFN-198) Consent Calendar Item 0 was added by Council President
Woods SHE MOVED to take the agenda out of order Orr seconded White asked to remove
Item F from the Consent Calendar The motion then carried
PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
A. Legislative Recognition. (CFN-198) Assistant Chief Administrative Officer Laurent
introduced the Senators and Representatives in attendance and recognized the efforts of all of
Kent's legislators on behalf of the City
B Proclamation —National Night Out. (CFN-155) Mayor White declared August 5, 2003,
as National Night Out and presented the proclamation to Police Chief Crawford Council
President Woods noted that the Council meeting of that date will be held at 5 00 p in rather than
7 00 p m so that Councilmembers can participate in the National Night Out program
CONSENT CALENDAR
WOODS MOVED to approve Consent Calendar Items A through O, with the exception of
Item F Orr seconded and the motion carried.
A Approval of Minutes. (CFN-198) The minutes of the regular meeting of July 3, 2003,
were approved
B Approval of Bills. (CFN-104) Payment of the bills received through June 30 and paid on
June 30 after auditing by the Operations Committee on July 1, 2003, were approved as follows
Approval of checks issued for vouchers
Date Check Numbers Amount
6/30/03 Wire Transfers 1450-1460 $1,019,243 89
6/30/03 Prepays & 550074 401.194 41
6/30/03 Regular 550073 1.647,74142
$3.068.179 72
Approval of checks issued for payroll for June 1 through June 15 and paid on June 20, 2003
Date Check Numbers Amount
6/6/03 Interim Checks 270836-270837 $ 2,81725
$ 2,81725
1
Kent City Council Minutes July 15, 2003
6/20/03 Checks 270838-271142 $ 240,036 08
6/20/03 Advices 149348-150030 1,194,431 63
$1,434,467 71
C Amendment to Washington City and County Pipeline Safety Consortium Agreement.
(CFN-1065) The Mayor was authorized to sign Amendment 2 to Interlocal Agreement
establishing the Washington City and County Pipeline Safety Consortium, extending the
agreement for one year
D. Kent CitV Code Amendment, Capital Facilities Element Yearly Update Process.
(CFN-377) Ordinance No 3650, amending Chapter 12 02 of the Kent City Code, to add
provisions for considering city initiated amendments to the comprehensive plan more than once
per year and providing for a public hearing before the City Council rather than the Land Use and
Planning Board for certain amendments to the Capital Facilities Element, was adopted
E Purchase of One Replacement Fire Engine. (CFN-122sf) The Mayor was authorized to
sign the contract between the City of Kent and Pierce manufacturing for the purchase of one (1)
replacement fire engine.
F REMOVED BY COUNCILMEMBER WHITE
Flexpass Contract 2003-2004. (CFN-171sf) Councilmember White stated that it is his belief
that taxpayers should not have to pay for City employees to travel to and from work WOODS
MOVED to authonze the Mayor to sign the administrative contract with King County and
Sound Transit effective July 1, 2003 through June 30, 2004 Clark seconded Becky Fowler of
Employee Services explained the cost of the program The motion then carried with White
opposed
G Group Health Cooperative Contract Renewal. (CFN-147) The Mayor was authorized to
sign the Group Health Cooperative contract effective January 1, 2003 through December 31,
2003
H Alexander Sewer Extension Bill Of Sale. (CFN-484) As recommended by the Public
Works Director, the Bill of Sale for the Alexander Water and Sewer Extension was accepted
I Torklift Parking Lot Street Improvement Bill of Sale. (CFN-484) As recommended by
the Public Works Director, the Bill of Sale for Torklift Parking Lot Street Improvements was
accepted
J Kent Vallev Ice Arena Utility Improvement Bill of Sale . (CFN-484) As recommended
by the Public Works Director, the Bill of Sale for Kent Valley Ice Arena Utility Improvements
was accepted
K Proposed LID 356, 111th Avenue Sanitary Sewers, Set Public Hearing Date,
Resolution. (CFN-1280) As recommended by the Public Works Committee, Resolution
No 1649 setting a public hearing date of August 19`h for the formation of LID 356, was Is
adopted
2
Kent City Council Minutes July 15, 2003
L Change of City Council Meeting Time. (CFN-198) Ordinance No 3651, which changes
the City Council meeting time on August 5, 2003, from 7 00 p in to 5 00 p in , was adopted
M. Taboma Vista Rezone Ordinance. (CFN-121) Ordinance No 3652 rezoning property
from Single Family Residential (SR-4 5), to Single Family Residential (SR-6), was adopted
N U.S. Department of Education Grant. (CFN-122so As recommended by the Public
Safety Committee, the Kent Police Department's application for the U S Department of
Education, Life Skills for State and Local Prisoners Program Grant,was authorized
0 ADDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT WOODS
Excused Absence. (CFN-198) An excused absence from tonight's meeting for
Councilmember Yingling was approved
BIDS
A Reith Road Water Main Improvements, 42nd Avenue South to Pump Station #4.
(CFN-1038) The bid opening for this project was held on July 2, 2003 with four bids received
The low bid was submitted by Kar-Vel Construction Co in the amount of$212,289 96 The
Engineer's estimate was $328,787 07 The Public Works Director recommends awarding this
contract to Kar-Vel Construction Co CLARK SO MOVED Peterson seconded and the motion
camed.
B Garrison Well & East Hill Well Replacement Wells. (CFN-1038) The bid opening for
this project was held on July 7, 2003 with two bids received The low bid was submitted by
Hokkaido Drilling, Inc in the amount of$273,196 80 The Engineer's estimate was
$270,933 76 The Public Works Director recommends awarding this contract to Hokkaido
Drilling, Inc , subject to contract reduction for contingency items 1084 through 1096 CLARK
SO MOVED Peterson seconded with an amendment to correct contingency item 1084 to 1086
The motion carried
REPORTS
Administrative Reports. (CFN-198) Martin reminded Councilmembers of an Executive
Session of 10-15 minutes to discuss potential property acquisition He added that action after
the Executive Session is expected
EXECUTIVE SESSION
The meeting recessed to Executive Session at 7 32 p in and reconvened at 7 44 p in (CFN-198)
ACTION AFTER EXECUTIVE SESSION
WOODS MOVED to approve the Northwest Housing Guild Purchase and Sale Agreement for
the Clasen property, to authorize the Mayor to execute any and all documents necessary to close
the land transaction upon review by the City Attorney, and to appropriate closing costs from the
Parks Land Acquisition account Epperly seconded and the motion camed (CFN-118gf)
3
Kent City Council Minutes July 15, 2003
PUBLIC HEARINGS
A Kent Downtown Public Market Development Authority, Transfer of Propertv and
Dissolution. (CFN-462so Mayor White noted that this date has been set for a public heanng
on the proposed dissolution of the PDA, and declared the public heanng open There were no
comments from the audience and WOODS MOVED to close the public heanng Orr seconded
and the motion camed WOODS MOVED to adopt Ordinance No 3649 dissolving the Kent
Downtown Public Market Development Authority, indemnifying the PDA Boardmembers, and
authorizing the Mayor to take any action or sign any documents necessary to dissolve the PDA
Epperly seconded and the motion earned
B. Formation of LID 355, SE 216th & 1041h Place SE Sanitary Sewers. (CFN-1279) City
Engineer Gary Gill explained the project, including the history, the need for the project, the
number of protests, and options if the LID is not formed WOODS MOVED to make all
correspondence a part of the public record Orr seconded and the motion earned
The Mayor opened the public heanng The following speakers were in favor of formation of the
LID, noting that the septic system is failing, that payments can be made over 10-15 years, and
that the failing systems cause danger to the community
Tim O'Neil, 21621 105'h Avenue SE, Lot 7
Dean Slaughter 21615 1051h Place SE Lot 6
Claudia Jacobus 10510 SE 220'h Street Lot 38
Nyoka Huddleston 10319 SE 216'h Street Lot 3
Kathy Pryor 10513 SE 220'h Street Lot 29
Nigel Southey Developer Lots 1 & 2
Jim Goldbaum 21629 1051h Place SE Lot 8
Joel Johnson 21622 1051h Place SE Lot 12
The following citizens spoke in opposition to the LID, saying the revised plan and the process
were unfair, and the costs are high
Loren Bonholzer 10426 SE 2191h Street Lot 19
Barry Ford 21905 105'h Avenue SE Lot 24
Renee Ford 21905 1051h Avenue SE Lot 24
Tina Bonholzer 10426 SE 2191h Street Lot 19
Lawrence Shoemaker 21915 1051h Avenue SE Lot 25
There were no further comments from the audience and WOODS MOVED to close the public
heanng Clark seconded and the motion tamed Staff responded to questions asked by Robert
Brooks, 21637 1051h Place SE, Lot 9, and Councilmembers regarding interest rates, sewer
charges, and pollution CLARK MOVED to approve the formation of LID 355 for construction
of the SE 2161h and 104'h Place SE Sanitary Sewers project, including related improvements, and
to direct the City Attorney to prepare the necessary ordinance Peterson seconded and the
motion earned
4
Kent City Council Minutes July 15, 2003
OTHER BUSINESS
A. Kent Station Preliminary Plat,Closed Record Anneal (9-2002-9(KIVA#RPP3-
2023555). (CFN-1277) The Mayor noted that the Hearing Examiner approved the preliminary
plat for Kent Station on January 30, 2003 The City Attorney turned his chair over to Mike
Walter, attorney representing the City Council,who explained the appeal and the process, and
pointed out that the Rule of Necessity applies in this case At 9 25 p m , the Council went into
Executive Session for approximately fifteen minutes, and reconvened at 9 52 p m At that point,
Mayor White turned the chairmanship over to Council President Woods Walter explained the
history of the appeal and the procedure to be followed
Don Shaffer, Kent C A R E S , and Kim Adams Pratt, Assistant City Attorney, each explained
the supplementary evidence they wish to submit, as shown in the Supplementary Evidence
binder.
ORR MOVED to deny the admittance of the supplemental information supplied by Kent
C A R E S Clark seconded Orr noted that that information was available prior to the hearing
in January The motion then camed ORR MOVED that the City's information be accepted
because it was not available at the time of the hearing Peterson seconded and the motion
carried
Mr Shaffer, 2070 N 78ih Street, Seattle, representing Kent C A R E S , then used his 30 minute
time allotment to speak about the City's conflict of interest, the Planned Unit Development and
appeals, freedom of speech, toxic contamination at the Borden site, the submittal of additional
evidence, and a violation of the PUD procedure Ms Pratt noted that there was no violation of
the PUD procedure, and addressed the issues of contamination, PUD appeals, the Hearing
Examiner's decision, and public notification Donald Marcy, 524 Second Avenue, Seattle,
representing Kent Station, LLC, stated that the contamination is not at a level which creates a
great deal of concern, and that the Hearing Examiner was aware of the potential impact to the
areas to the north when he made his decision (Pratt and Marcy used approximately 15 minutes
of their time allotment )
At 10 55 p m , the Council recessed to Executive Session for five minutes Upon their return, at
11 01 p m , ORR MOVED to sustain the Hearing Examiner's January 30, 2003, Findings,
Conclusions and Decision Peterson seconded Orr explained that there are no criteria to
reverse the decision The motion then carried
ADJOURNMENT
At 11 05 p m ,WOODS MOVED to adjourn the meeting Orr seconded and the motion carried
(CFN-198)
9
Brenda Jacober, CMC
City Clerk
5
Kent City Council Meeting
Date August 5, 2003
Category Consent Calendar
I. SUBJECT: LID 355, SE 216TH & 104TH PLACE SE SANITARY SEWERS,
ORDINANCE—ADOPT
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Adoption of Ordinance No. that orders the
construction of the sanitary sewer system in the vicinity of SE 216`h Street and 104`h
Place SE in accordance with Resolution No. 1645, establishes Local Improvement
District ("LID") 355 and orders the carrying out of the proposed improvement, provides
for payment of the improvement in part by special assessment, and provides for the
issuance and sale of LID warrants.
Resolution No. 1645, adopted on June 17, 2003, declared the City Council's intention
to order the installation of sanitary sewers in the vicinity of SE 216' Street and 104'
Place SE. At its July 15, 2003, meeting, Council held a public hearing regarding the
proposed improvement. At the conclusion of the hearing, Council determined the
improvements are in the best interests of the city and requested that the City Attorney
prepare an ordinance establishing the necessary LID. This ordinance forms LID 355 in
order to carry out the improvements of the project.
3 EXHIBITS: Ordinance
4. RECOMMENDED BY: Council
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. UNBUDGETED FISCALJPERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS•
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 6C
ORDINANCE NO,
AN ORDINANCE of the city council of the city of
Kent, Washington, ordering the construction of an 8" sanitary
sewer system with 6" side sewer stubs to the right-of-way
line or easement line, all in accordance with Resolution No
1645 of the city council, establishing Local Improvement
District No 355 and ordering the carrying out of the
proposed improvement, providing that payment for the
improvement be made in part by special assessments upon
the property in the District, payable by the mode of"payment
by bonds", and providing for the issuance and sale of local
improvement district warrants redeemable in cash or other
• short-tern financing and local improvement district bonds
I
WHEREAS, by Resolution No 1645 adopted June 17, 2003, the city
council declared its intention to order the construction of an 8" sanitary sewer system
I '
with 6" side sewer stubs to the right-of-way line or easement line, and fixed July 15,
2003, at 7 00 p in , local time, in the council chambers of City Hall as the time and
place for hearing all matters relating to the proposed improvement and all comments
thereon and objections thereto and for determining the method of payment for the
improvement, and
WHEREAS, the city's Public Works Director caused an estimate to be
made of the cost and expense of the proposed improvement and certified that estimate
to the city council, together with all papers and information in his possession touching
the proposed improvement, a description of the boundaries of the proposed local
improvement district and a statement of what portion of the cost and expense of the
improvement should be borne by the property within the proposed district, and
LID 355 Formation Ordinance
50391569 01
WHEREAS, that estimate is accompanied by a diagram of the proposed •
improvement showing thereon the lots, tracts,parcels of land, and other property which
will be specially benefited by the proposed improvement and the estimated cost and
expense thereof to be borne by each lot, tract and parcel of land or other property, and
WHEREAS, due notice of the above hearing was given in the manner
provided by law, and the hearing was held by the city council on the date and at the
time above mentioned, [and all objections to the proposed improvement were duly
considered and overruled,] and all persons appearing at such hearing and wishing to be
heard were heard, and
WHEREAS, the city council has determined it to be in the best interests
of the city that the improvement as hereinafter described be tamed out and that a local
improvement district be created in connection therewith, NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON,
DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS .
SECTION I The city council of the city of Kent, Washington, orders
the improvement of the properties within the area described in Exhibit A, attached
I1 hereto and by this reference made a part hereof, by the construction of an 8" sanitary
sewer system with 6" side sewer stubs to the nght-of-way line or easement line
All of the foregoing shall be in accordance with the plans and
specifications therefor prepared by the city's Public Works Director, and may be
modified by the city council as long as such modification does not affect the purpose of
the improvement
SECTION There is created and established a local improvement
district to be called Local Improvement District No 355 of the city of Kent,
Washington (the "District"), the boundaries or territorial extent of the District being
more particularly described in Exhibit B, attached hereto and by this reference
incorporated herein
r
-2- LID 355 Formanon Ordinance
50391569 01
SECTIONS The total estimated cost and expense of the improvement
is declared to be $819,270. Approximately $758,866 of the cost and expense shall be
home by and assessed against the property specially benefited by such improvement
included in the Distnct, which embraces as nearly as practicable all property specially
benefited by such improvement and the balance of such cost and expense shall be paid
by the city
SECTION 4 In accordance with the provisions of RCW 35 44 047, the
city may use any method or combination of methods to compute assessments that may
be deemed to more fairly reflect the special benefits to the properties being assessed
than the statutory method of assessing the properties
SECTION 5 No property, any portion of which is outside the District,
may connect to those improvements constructed or made a part of such District unless
either that property shall have been subject to the special assessments on the
assessment roll for that District or the owners of that property shall have paid prior to
such connection a charge in lieu of assessment, which shall be at least the equivalent of
I' those assessments that would have been applied to that property had it been included
within that District
SECTION 6 Local improvement distnct warrants may be issued in
i
payment of the cost and expense of the improvement herein ordered to be assessed,
such warrants to be paid out of the Local Improvement Fund, District No 355,
hereinafter created and referred to as the Local Improvement Fund, and, until the bonds
referred to in this section are issued and delivered to the purchaser thereof, to bear
interest from the date thereof at a rate to be established hereafter by the city's Finance
Department Director, as issuing officer, and to be redeemed in cash and/or by local
improvement district bonds herein authorized to be issued, such interest-bearing
warrants to be hereafter referred to as "revenue warrants " In the alternative, the city
hereafler may provide by ordinance for the issuance of other short-term obligations
pursuant to chapter 39 50 RCW
If the city shall authonze expenditures to be made for such
improvement (other than for any cost or expense expected to be borne by the city) prior
-3- LID 355 Formation Ordinance
503915b 01
to the date that any short-term obligations or local improvement district bonds are
issued to finance the improvement, from proceeds of interfund loans or other funds that
are not, and are not reasonably expected to be, reserved, allocated on a long-term bans
or otherwise set aside to pay the cost of the improvement herein ordered to be assessed
against the property specially benefited thereby, the city declares its official intent that
those expenditures, to the extent not reimbursed with prepaid special benefit
assessments, are to be reimbursed from proceeds of short-term obligations or local
improvement district bonds that are expected to be issued for the improvement in a
principal amount not exceeding $758,866
The city is authorized to issue local improvement district bonds for the
District that shall bear interest at a rate and be payable on or before a date to be
hereafter fixed by ordinance. The bonds shall be issued in exchange for and/or in
redemption of any and all revenue warrants issued hereunder or other short-term
I
obligations hereafter authorized and not redeemed in cash within twenty(20) days after
the expiration of the thirty-day period for the cash payment without interest of •
assessments on the assessment roll for the District The bonds shall be paid and
redeemed by the collection of special assessments to be levied and assessed against the
property within the District, payable in annual installments, with interest at a rate to be
hereafter fixed by ordinance under the mode of"payment by bonds," as defined by law
and the ordinances of the city The exact form, amount, date, interest rate, and
denominations of such bonds hereafter shall be fixed by ordinance of the city council
Such bonds shall be sold in such manner as the city council hereafter shall determine
SECTION 7 For the purpose of paying all or a part of the costs of
carrying out the improvements within the District pending the receipt of the proceeds
of the issuance and sale of the bonds or short-term obligations referred to in Section 5,
interfund loans from the General Fund and/or Street Fund to the Local Improvement
Fund in the maximum aggregate amount of $758,866 are authonzed and approved,
those loans to be repaid on or before the issuance of such bonds or libations from the
proceeds thereof. Each of the interfund loans shall bear interest at a variable rate,
adjusted the 15t' and last day of each month, equal to the interest rate of the State of
Washington Local Government Investment Pool on the 151h and last day of each
4- LID 355 Formation Ordinance
50391569 01
0 month The initial interest rate on the date of each interfund loan shall be determined
as of the last preceding interest payment adjustment date.
SECTION 8 In all cases where the work necessary to be done in
connection with the making of such improvement is carried out pursuant to contract
upon competitive bids (and the city shall have and reserves the right to reject any and
all bids), the call for bids shall include a statement that payment for such work will be
made in cash warrants drawn upon the Local Improvement Fund
SECTION I The Local Improvement Fund for the District is created
and established in the office of the Finance Department Director of the city, The
proceeds from the sale of revenue warrants or other short-term obligations drawn
against the fund which may be issued and sold by the city and the collections of special
assessments, interest and penalties thereon shall be deposited in the Local
Improvement Fund Cash warrants to the contractor or contractors in payment for the
work to be done by them in connection with the improvement and cash warrants in
payment for all other items of expense in connection with the improvement shall be
issued against the Local Improvement Fund
SECTION 10 Within fifteen (15) days of the passage of this ordinance
there shall be filed with the Finance Department Director of the city the title of the
improvement and District number, a copy of the diagram or print showing the
boundaries of the District and the preliminary assessment roll or abstract of such roll
showing thereon the lots, tracts and parcels of land that will be specially benefited
thereby and the estimated cost and expense of such improvement to be borne by each
lot, tract or parcel of land The Finance Department Director of the city immediately
shall post the proposed assessment roll upon her index of local improvement
assessments against the properties affected by the local improvement
-5- LID 355 Formation Ordinance
5039158901
SECTION IL This ordinance shall take effect and be in force five (5) 0
days from and after its passage, approval, and publication as required by law.
JIM WHITE,MAYOR
ATTEST.
BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK
APPRWASORM:
FOSTER PLVPER& SHEFELMAN PLLC
Special Counsel and Bond Counsel
Passed the day of August, 2003
Approved the day of August,2003.
Published the day of August,2003.
-6- LID 355 Formation Ordinance
50J9156 01
CERTIFICATION
I, the undersigned, city clerk of the city of Kent, Washington, hereby certify as
follows
1 The attached copy of Ordinance No is a full, true and correct copy of
an ordinance duly passed at a regular meeting of the city council of the city held at the
regular meeting place thereof on August 5, 2003, as that ordinance appears on the
minute book of the city, and the ordinance will be in full force and effect five (5) days
after the publication of its summary in the city's official newspaper, and
2 A quorum of the members of the city council was present throughout the
meeting and a majority of those members present voted in the proper manner for the
passage of the ordinance
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this day of
August, 2003
CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON
I
BRENDA JACOBER, City Clerk
i
Ali
I
5039156901 -7- LID 355 Formation Ordinance
EXHIBIT"A"
LID 355
SE 216T" STREET AND 104T11 PLACE SE SANITARY SEWERS
BOUNDARY LEGAL DESCRIPTION
LOTS 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8, BLOCK 1 AND LOTS 1, 2, 3, 4, AND 5, BLOCK 2 AND LOT
8, BLOCK 3, ALL LOCATED IN MOUNT VIEW PARK, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT
RECORDED IN VOLUME 67 OF PLATS, PAGE 84, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY,
WASHINGTON,
AND ALSO LOTS 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 AND 12, BLOCK 1 AND LOTS 1, 2, 3, 4, 5,
6, 7, 8, 9 AND 10, BLOCK 2, ALL LOCATED IN MOUNT VIEW PARK NO 2,
ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 75 OF PLATS, PAGE 43,
RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON,
AND ALSO, THE WEST 80 FEET OF THE EAST 160 FEET OF THE NORTH 170 FEET OF
THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST
QUARTER OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 22 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W M , IN KING
COUNTY, WASHINGTON, EXCEPT THE NORTH 30 FEET FOR SE 216T" STREET,
AND ALSO, LOT A, OF KING COUNTY SHORT PLAT NO 574084, RECORDED UNDER
RECORDING NO 7412160327, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SAID
SHORT PLAT IS A PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST
QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 22 NORTH,
RANGE 5 EAST, W M , IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON,
AND ALSO, THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE
SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 22 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W M ,
IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, EXCEPT THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED TRACTS
OF LAND THE NORTH 170 FEET OF THE EAST 160 FEET OF SAID SUBDIVISION,
S PLDSvCaroPLlD 355\Boundap Legal EiLihu A and B dm
THE NORTH 300 FEET OF THE WEST 90 FEET OF THE EAST 250 FEET OF SAID
SUBDIVISION,
THE WEST 258 FE-ETOF THE SOUTH 300FEET OF SAID SUBDIVISION, THE WEST
162 50 FEET OF SAID SUBDIVISION, LYING NORTH OF THE SOUTH 300 FEET
THEREOF,
AND ALSO, ALL OF TRACTS 11 AND 12 OF UNRECORDED PLAT OF UNEEDAN
ORCHARD TRACTS, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS.
BEGINNING AT A POINT 30 FEET EAST OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION
8, TOWNSHIP 22 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W M , IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON,
THENCE NORTH 1,329 24 FEET,
THENCE EAST 603 88 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING,
THENCE EAST 633 88 FEET,
THENCE NORTH 64199 FEET,
THENCE WEST 15 17 FEET,
THENCE NORTH 15 FEET,
THENCE WEST 618 54 FEET,
THENCE SOUTH 642 04 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING,
EXCEPT THE SOUTH 390 FEET THEREOF,
AND EXCEPT THE WEST 258 FEET OF TRACT 11,
AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON BY
DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8912181267,
AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS
THAT PORTION OF LOT B OF KING COUNTY SHORT PLAT NO 574084, RECORDED
UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 7412160327, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE
NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP
22 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W M , IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON,
5 PEDSGm1�LID JSS\Boundan Lekd Ealubn A and B dor '
THENCE EAST 383 88 FEET,
THENCE SOUTH 632 36 FEET,
THENCE EAST 66 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING,
THENCE CONTINUING EAST 40 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT
HAVING A RADIUS OF 60 FEET,
THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 45 DEGREES AN
ARC DISTANCE OF 45 92 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVE TO THE RIGHT
HAVING A RADIUS OF 90 FEET,
THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 45 DEGREES AN
ARC DISTANCE OF 68 88 FEET,
THENCE EAST 37 94 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION,
THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE 71 3 FEET,
THENCE WEST 184 FEET TO A POINT SOUTH OF THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING,
THENCE NORTH TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING,
AND ALSO EXCEPT THE EAST 184 FEET (AS MEASURED ALONG THE SOUTH LINE)
OF THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER
OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 22 NORTH, RANGE 5
EAST, W M , IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS
BEGINNING AT A POINT 30 FEET EAST OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNIER OF SAID
SECTION,
THENCE NORTH 1,329 24 FEET,
THENCE EAST 603 88 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING,
THENCE EAST 633 88 FEET,
THENCE NORTH 641 99 FEET,
THENCE WEST 15.17 FEET,
THENCE NORTH 15 FEET,
THENCE WEST 618 54 FEET,
THENCE SOUTH 642 04 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING,
EXCEPT THE SOUTH 350 FEET THEREOF,
S PCDSCarollLID 3i5\13nnidary Legal Glubi A and R doc
. AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONDEMNED BY THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
UNDER SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NUMBER 95-2-019475-1,
AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY BY DEED RECORDED
UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NUMBER 9802040743.
AND ALSO, THAT PORTION OF LOT B, KING COUNTY SHORT PLAT NUMBER
574084, RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 7412160327, DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING A T T HE N ORTHEAST C ORNER 0 F T HE N ORTHEAST Q UARTER O F
THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 8,
TOWNSHIP 22 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W M , IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON,
THENCE EAST383 88 FEET,
THENCE SOUTH 632 36 FEET,
THENCE EAST 66 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING,
THENCE CONTINUING EAST 40 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT
HAVING A RADIUS OF 60 FEET,
THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 450 AN ARC
DISTANCE OF 45 92 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING
A RADIUS OF 90 FEET,
THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 450 AN ARC
DISTANCE OF 68 88 FEET,
THENCE EAST 37 94 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION,
THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE 71 3 FEET,
THENCE WEST 184 FEET TO A POINT SOUTH OF THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING,
THENCE NORTH TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING,
TOGETHER WITH THE EAST 184 FEET (AS MEASURED ALONG THE SOUTH LINE)
OF THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER
S PEDSC,,.VL ID 355\Romda,Legal E0.1ol A and D do,
OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 22 NORTH, RANGE 5
EAST W M , IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS
COMMENCING AT A POINT 30 FEET EAST OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID
SECTION;
THENCE NORTH 1,329 24 FEET,
THENCE EAST 603 88 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING,
THENCE EAST 633 88 FEET,
THENCE NORTH 641 99 FEET,
THENCE WEST 15 17 FEET,
THENCE NORTH 15 FEET;
THENCE WEST 618 54 FEET,
THENCE SOUTH 642 04 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING,
EXCEPT THE SOUTH 390 FEET THEREOF,
AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF
WASHINGTON BY WARRANTY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER
9406020493,
(BEING KNOWN AS A PORTION OF TRACT 12, UNEEDAN ORCHARD TRACTS,
ACCORDING TO THE UNRECORDED PLAT THEREOF),
(ALL OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED BEING KNOWN AS A PORTION OF PARCEL B
KING COUNTY LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NUMBER 1085020),
EXCEPT ANY PORTIONS OF ALL THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN LYING
WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY
S PFDS`CaroCL1D 7SS�13nnudary Legal EINhn A and B doa
EXHIBIT "B"
LID 355
SANITARY SEINER IMPROVEMENTS
The proposed project Is the construction of an 8" sanitary sewer system with 6" side sewer stubs
to the right of way line or easement line for each of the 39 properties Included in the L I D
boundary
The construction will include 8" sewer at the following locations
ON FROM TO
105'h Place SE SE 218'h Street Approximately 400 feet north
SE 218'h Street 1051h Place SE 105'h Avenue SE
105'h A\enue SE SE 2181h Street SE 220'h Street approximately 75'
feet West of East plat boundary
SE 219'h Street 1051h Avenue SE East and West to cul-de-sac
Easement SE 219°i St at end of Approximately 240 feet north-
cul-de-sac West of westerly from center of cul-de-sac
105'h Avenue SE
Easement End of above easement Intersection of 103`d Place SE
and SE 216'h Street at existing
manhole
S PEDSICe,oIILID 355 Boman Lcpl[Huhn 1 nd 11 doc
Kent City Council Meeting
Date August 5, 2003
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: 2002 WATER SYSTEM/WATER CONSERVATION POTENTIAL
ASSESSMENT AMENDING ORDINANCE—ADOPT
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Adoption of Ordinance No. amending the
2002 Water System Plan to include the City's June 3, 2003, Water Conservation
Potential Assessment.
The Washington State Department of Health requires the City to prepare a Water
System Plan and update the Plan every 6 years. The City's current water system plan
was adopted in June 2002. In accordance with the Tacoma Pipeline 5 Second Supply
Project, the city was required to conduct a Water Conservation Potential Assessment,
which was completed on June 3, 2003. This ordinance amends the City's current water
system plan to include the conservation provisions of the assessment.
3. EXHIBITS: Ordinance
• 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
. DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 6D
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Don E Wickstrom, P E Public Works Director
. Phone 253-856-5500
K E N T Fax 253-856-6500
w n s e w c*o r+ Address 220 Fourth Avenue S
Kent,WA 98032-5895
DATE: Jul
Fv T 2003
TO: Nvq , r White and Kent City Council
FROM: Do ickslrom, Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Water Conservation Potential Assessment
SUMMARY:
As per our agreement for the Pipeline 5 Second Supply Project, we were required to conduct a
Water Conservation Potential Assessment (CPA) The City of Kent has implemented water
conservation programs and activities since 1993, targeting commercial, industrial and residential.
The CPA examined potential for additional or expanded conservation measures which would
help to attain 10% reduction in water use from improved water-use efficiency by year 2010.
BUDGET IMPACT No Unbudgeted Fiscal/Personnel Impact
MOTION: Recommend Council amend the 2002 Water System Plan (Ordinance # 3606
adopted at the June 18, 2002 City Council Meeting) to include the Water Conservation Potential
Assessment.
BACKGROUND:
The Conservation Potential Assessment evaluated potential water savings and associated costs
for conservation measures that can be taken between year 2003 and year 2010 These water
conservation savings are in addition to those realized since our conservation program began in
1993. The CPA fulfills the requirements of the Memorandum of Agreement between partners in
the Second Supply Project, Department of Health and Department of Ecology
Mayor White and Kent City Council Water Conservation Potential Assessment-Amend Plan
July 7, 2003
1
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the city council of the city of
Kent, Washington, amending the 2002 Water System Plan
adopted by Ordinance No 3606 to include the city's June
3, 2003, Water Conservation Potential Assessment
� I
WHEREAS, the Washington State Department of Health requires the
city to prepare a Water System Plan and update the Plan every 6 years, and
I�
WHEREAS, the city's 2002 Water System Plan was adopted in June
2002, and is a compilation of planning and engineering analyses conducted to
determine the adequacy of the city's water system to meet existing and projected
requirements for provision of domestic and fire protection service within the city's
established water service area, and
WHEREAS, in accordance with the Tacoma Pipeline 5 Second Supply
Project, the city was required to conduct a Water Conservation Potential Assessment,
and
WHEREAS, the Water Conservation Potential Assessment was
completed on June 3, 2003 and, accordingly, it is appropriate to amend the city's
Water System Plan to include the conservation provisions of the assessment, NOW
THEREFORE,
1 2002 Water System Plan —
Water Conservation Potential Assessment
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON
DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS
SECTION I. - Amendment Chapter 4 of the city's 2002 Water System
Plan, entitled "Conservation Program," is amended to also include the June 3, 2003,
Water Conservation Potential Assessment, attached and incorporated as Exhibit "A "
The conservation measures established in the Water Conservation Potential
I
Assessment shall be in addition to those measures already established in the 2002
Water System Plan
SECTION 2. - Severabilzty If any section, subsection, paragraph,
sentence, clause, or phrase of this ordinance is declared unconstitutional or invalid for
any reason, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this
ordinance
�I
SECTION 3. - Effective Date This ordinance shall take effect and be
in force thirty(30) days from and after its passage as provided by law
II
JIM WHITE, MAYOR
i
ATTEST
BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM
TOM BRUBAKER, CITY ATTORNEY
2 2002 Water System Plan—
Water Conservation Potential Assessment
PASSED day of August, 2003
APPROVED day of August, 2003
PUBLISHED day of August, 2003
I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No passed
by the city council of the city of Kent, Washington, and approved by the mayor of the
I city of Kent as hereon indicated.
(SEAL)
BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK
P\Oml\OrEiNOca\WazcsCowcrvaiwnPmcmalAssasmcm?OOJ Eoc
I
3 2002 Water System Plan —
Water Conservation Potential Assessment
City of Kent
Water Conservation Potential Assessment
June 3, 2003
4400 dh
KENT
WASH I N G T O N
Department of Public Works
Don E Wickstrom, P E , Director
220 4t" Avenue S
Kent, WA 98032
Mier,"
Bellevue Mount Vernon Olympia Portland Tn Cities
City of Kent
Water Conservation
Potential Assessment
June 3, 2003
Prepared for:
City of Kent
Department of Public Works
Don E. Wickstrom, P.E., Director
220 4t" Avenue S.
Kent, WA 98032
Prepared By:
Economic and Engineering Services, Inc.
626 Columbia Street, NW, Suite 2a
Olympia, WA 08901 98507-0976
(360) 352-5090
June 3,2003
iTa • of Contents
1 Introduction
2 Summary of Findings
3 Demographic Data and Projections
4 Water Use Characteristics in City of Kent Service Area
41 Connections
42 Total Water Production. .. ....... . .. .... ... .4-2
43 Non-Revenue Water .. 4-4
44 Water Demand by Customer Class .. . . .. 4-5
5 Existing Conservation Program
51 Conservation Activities Addressing Customer Use . . . . . 5-1
52 Water System Measures to Improve Efficiency . . . .5-5
6 Conservation Potential within City of Kent Service Area
61 General Residential and Commercial Conservation Measures 6-1
62 Conservation Measures Associated with Industrial Processes . . .. . . . . 6-6
6.2 1 Estimated Water Savings for Industrial Process Water . . ... 6-7
6 2 2 Estimated Costs for Conservation Involving Industrial Process Water.. 6-8
63 Avoided Cost Compan son .. ..... 6-9
64 Screening by Cost-effectiveness and Water Savings 6-10
65 Conservation Savings Realized through Water Efficient Plumbing Code 6-12
6 5 1 Residential Code Savings . 6-12
6 5 2 Non-residential Code Savings 6-13
6 5 3 Total Code Savings.. .... 6-13
7 Data Required for Conservation Evaluation of Second Supply
Project Agreement implementation
Appendices
A Data and Methodology for Calculating Water Usage by Customer Class
B Measure Descriptions
•
Table of Contents
City of Kent k,.V 03 11V pDoc
June 3,2003
2-1 Summary of Potential Water Savings. . ...... . 2-2
3-1 Population and Employment... . .. 3-1
4-1 Past and Projected Water Production.. . ... .... ..... ... 4-3
4-2 Monthly Production —2000. 4-4
5-1 City of Kent's Conservation Program Summary. . ... .... . 5-2
5-2 City of Kent's Water System Measures that Lead to More Efficient Water Use .. 5-6
6-1 Estimated Water Savings and Costs for Identified Conservation Actions . . . 6-3
6-2 Unit Costs Derived from Consortium Report . .. 6-9
6-3 Measures Offering the Greatest Conservation Opportunities .6-11
6-4 Estimate of Plumbing Code Savings from Residential Toilets . .. 6-13
6-5 Estimate of Plumbing Code Savings from Commercial Toilets . . . .. 6-14
7-1 Data Requirements to Support MOA Evaluation Methodology ... .. ... 7-2
4-1 Number of Connections Total and by Type of Customer 4-1
4-2 Historical and Projected Average Day, Average Summer Day, and Peak Day
Production 4-2
4-3 Amount of Revenue and Non-Revenue Water Produced . .4-5
4-4 Comparison of Water Sold During 2000 to Water Sold During Summer 2000
by Customer Class 4-6
4-5 2000 Total Water Sold 4-7
4-6 2000 Monthly Water Sold - Largest Customer Class 4-8
4-7 2000 Monthly Water Sold - Other Customer Classes and Lawn Imgation 4-9
5-1 Consumption per Single Family Account 1993-2001 5-5
Table of Contents tl
City of Kent t „�-0}ii�rcpam
June 3,2003
i
Introduction
This technical memorandum presents the results of a Conservation Potential Assessment
performed for the City of Kent (Kent) by Economic and Engineering Services, Inc (EES) The
purpose of the Conservation Potential Assessment is to evaluate the potential water savings and
associated costs for conservation measures that could be undertaken between year 2003 and year
2010. These conservation water savings would be in addition to those realized by Kent since
beginning their ongoing conservation program in 1993.
This Conservation Potential Assessment fulfills the terms for an evaluation of this kind, stated in
a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) among Kent, its partners in Tacoma's Second Supply
Project (SSP), the Washington State Department of Health (DOH), and the Washington State
Department of Ecology (Ecology). The MOA was signed in 2001.
At the outset of this assessment, it was determined that use would be made of pre-existing,
regional-scale information on conservation measures, as applied to the Kent service area
Therefore, this should be considered a coarse-scale assessment to determine estimated overall
savings and costs and screen potential measures Further refinement, especially of cost figures,
should be performed to establish firm budgets prior to implementing the conservation measures
discussed herein
The information in this technical memorandum is organized as follows
■ Summary of Findings
■ Demographic Data and Projections
■ Water Use Characteristics in Kent Service Area
■ Existing Conservation Program
■ Conservation Potential within Kent Service Area
■ Data Required for Conservation Evaluation of Second Supply Project Agreement
Implementation
•
Section 1-Introduction 'I-1
City of Kent knu2-03 IlLcpa,koc
June 3,2003
Section
Summary of
The City of Kent has had a water conservation program in place since 1993 The program
involves an extensive array of measures targeting commercial, industrial and residential demand,
as well as City facilities
A total of 72 additional or expanded water conservation measures were evaluated as a part of this
effort, using data from available studies in the Pacific Northwest Of the 72 measures reviewed,
28 appear to offer the best opportunities for water conservation. These are measures that offer
potential savings of at least 5,000 gallons per day (gpd) during the summer season, and cost less
than $6 00 per 1,000 gallons of water saved over the lifetime of the measure The $6 00
threshold was developed by estimating the "avoided cost" of both water production by the City
of Kent and wastewater disposal to the King County Metro system
Total potential savings for this suite of conservation measures are 614,000 gpd on an average,
year round basis Total potential savings are 834,000 gpd on an average daily basis during the
summer season Since average daily demand during the summer season is projected to be 14 48
mgd in year 2010, this represents summer water savings of approximately 5 8% by year 2010
Additional water savings can be achieved through attention to industrial process water. Based on
published sources, it was assumed that industrial process water savings can amount to a 10%
reduction in total water sold to industrial customers. This amounts to approximately 90,000 gpd
on an average day basis during the summer season This is approximately 0 6% of total summer
season production in year 2010
Another area for water savings is the continued implementation of the 1993 plumbing code,
which affects efficiency of plumbing fixtures throughout the Kent service area. The total
estimated savings from the plumbing code amount to approximately 200,000 gpd between years
2003 and 2010 This amount would be the same on a year round basis as during the summer
season Compared with the projected summer season production of 14 48 mgd, this is equivalent
to approximately 1 4% summer water savings in year 2010
Water system measures to reduce non-revenue water were also reviewed. The City already has
implemented a range of measures to control non-revenue water Based on EES' experience, it is
not unusual for water systems to have non-revenue water in the range of 10-15% Non-revenue
water is currently less than 5% of total water produced Non-revenue water is an inherent
element of water system management which can never be eliminated entirely While the City
should continually strive for improvement, additional savings in this area would be difficult and
are not estimated here
Table 2-1 summarizes total potential water savings from the elements discussed in this
Conservation Potential Assessment
Section 2-Summary of Findings 2-1
City of Kent ktnO-03 1 �
June 3,2003
2003Table 2-1
Summary of Potential Water Savings
Between r
Year-Round ravings Summer Season Savings
Savings in % of Total Savings in %of Total
Category d Production gpd Production
Measures in single-family, multifamily and 614,000 5 3% 834,000 5 8%
commercial sectors
Industrial Process Water 72,500 0 6% 90,000 0 6%
Code Savings 200.000 1 7% 200,000 1 4%
Total Potential Savings 886,500 7.6% 1 1,124,000 7.8%
Section 2.Summary of Findings 2-2
City of Kent tens OLVI'Zkp&°oc
June 3,2003
'Section
Demographic Data • Projections
In order to determine how to focus conservation efforts, it is important to evaluate the
composition of Kent's customer base and how the water supply is used. Table 3-1 presents
historical and projected growth of Kent's drinking water customers According to Kent's 2002
Water System Plan (draft), between 1988 and 1996, the growth rate was 2.36% per year,
calculated as a simple (not compound) growth rate Year 2000 and future population projections
were calculated based on information available through the Puget Sound Regional Council
(PSRC) This information reflects findings of the 2000 United States Census as well as
geographical differences between Kent's city limits and water service area These population
estimates indicate a compounded growth rate of less than 1% per year between 2000 and 2020
This projection of significantly lower growth likely reflects the fact that in the last decade or so,
many areas in the Kent service area have been built out to their land use capacity
Table 3-1
Population and Employment
Year
1990 1994 2000 2003 2010 2020
Population 40,877 ' 44,875 / 59,493 ' 60,88777 64,135 70,299
Single-Family
Households N/A 8,324 tat 8,849 f41 9,167 1� 9,909 (6) 11,281 (6)
Multi-Family
Households N/A 14,108 tsl 14,889 i51 15,908 ill 16,796 I6t 19,121 I6)
Employment N/A 53,787 (91 55,717 131 56,520 O1 58,934 1 o 64,074 ta)
I Estimate derived by assuming an annual growth rate between 1988 and 1996 to be 2 30%per Kent's 2002 Water System Plan(draft)
2 Untitled tabular mformation summarizing residential commercial and unaccounted for water(1991-1999)provided by City of Kent 3103
3 Estimate made using PSRC data for area,includes 2000 Census information
4 Kent's most recent estimate Spreadsheet provided by City of Kent 3/03 entitled Kent water supply pipeline 5 stars 3 '
5 Estimate made by subtracting the number of single fanuly accounts(4)from PSRC estimate of total households(3) This value corresponds
well with an estimate of 14,427 from Pipeline 5 documentation
6 Estimate made using PSRC estimate of total households(3)and assuming the ratio of single to multi-family households remains similar to
that of 2000(about 59%)
7 Derived through interpolation between 2000 and 2010 PSRC estimates
8 Assumption that the ratio of single to multi-family households remains similar to that of 2000
9 Assume growth rate between 1993-2000 equals rate between 2000 and 2010
Section 3-Demographic Data and Projections 3-7
City of Kent 12/ mr
June 3, 2003
'Section
Water Use Characteristics in City of
Service Area
4.1 Connections
Exhibit 4-1 presents the number of connections, or accounts, from 1993 through 2001 This
information does not reflect the number of households or consumers served by each account or
the amount of water consumed However, it does indicate that single family accounts make up
about 72% of all accounts
Exhibit 4-1
Number of Connections: Total and by Type of Customer
15,000
I
12,500
W
c
0
; 10,000
v 7,500 - -_-- - - - -- - -- -
o
E5,000 -I
Z
z
2,500 - - - - -- - - -I
0
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
Year
- - Single Family Residential - - Mufti-Family Residential
—Total - - -Commercial Accounts
Source Untitled table summarizing residential and commercial accounts,received from City of Kent,March 2003
Note There is a discrepancy between 1994 and 1995,but these data can not be reviewed to determine the cause
Overall, the number of accounts grew at a compounded rate of about 2 5% per year. Multi-
family residential accounts grew at the fastest rate, 3.2% (compounded) growth per year
section 4•Water Use Characteristics in City of Kent Service Area 4-1
City or Kent lr�3 I17hnaJ r
June 3,2003
Commercial accounts increased by 2 9% compounded per year and the total number of
residential (single family and multi-family) accounts grew at about 2 4% compounded per year.
Most recently, the growth rate of total connections has slowed down Between 1999 and 2001,
annual growth in the number of connections was less than 1% Commercial accounts increased
at the fastest compounded rate, of about 1 5%
4.2 Total Water Production
Exhibit 4-2 and Table 4-1 present information on Kent's past and projected water production
Production is the total of all water produced from the sources by Kent and accounts not only for
water Kent provides to customers, but also non-revenue water, which may have been used to
conduct system maintenance or lost through leakage
Exhibit 4-2
Historical and Projected Average Day, Average Summer Day,
and Peak Day Production
30 - Actualtee
25 2001 • • j
o Drought
E 20 • .
p 15
t 10
i - - -
5 -
0
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2 2 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020
Year
— - -Akg Day --A%g Summer Day
- - -Peak Day A%g Summer Day (projected)
• Aug Day (projected) • Peak Day (Projected)
Past data were obtained from Kent's production records "Average Daily Production" is the
annual amount of water produced by Kent divided by the number of days per year. "Peak Day
Production" is the maximum amount of water produced by Kent on a single day during the given
year Generally, the peak day of each year occurs in August However, in 1993, the peak day
occurred in the beginning of September and in 1994, the peak day occurred in mid-July.
section 4-Water Use Characteristics in City of Kent service Area 4-2
City of Kent k,we 3 nVm.
June 3,2003
For purposes of this Conservation Potential Assessment, it is desirable to evaluate demands .
during the summer season "Average Summer Day" is an important statistic in the MOA
discussed in the Introduction This value is calculated in this technical memorandum as the total
amount of water produced between June 1 and September 30 divided by 122 days This was
selected as the summer season because demands increase significantly and dry weather occurs
during this period of time.
Table 4-1
Past and Projected Water Production
Average Day Production Average Summer Day Peak Day Production
Year (mgd) (mgd) (mgd)
1990 855 N/A 1497
2000 842 1054 1374
2001 777 904 1188
2002 7 86 1001 1481
Projections
2010 1158 1448 2049
2020 1406 1758 2489
Hisionc Average Day Production information was provided by Kent 3-25-03,entitled"5yr monthly for ees,"
Projected average day productions are from City of Kent 2002 Water Supply Plan(draft)
Historical calculations made from spreadsheet provided by Kent 3-25-03,entitled"5yr monthly forces,"
Projections were based on the assumption that the average summer day would have a 25%higher production than the
average day,year round,consistent with recent production data
3 Historical numbers provided in communication with Ron Halverson,3-26-03,projected peak day data are from City
of Kent 2002 Water Supply Plan(draft)
Projected peak and average day production for the entire system were obtained from Kent's 2002
Water System Plan (draft) The projected peak day projections are Kent's medium estimates
Future average summer day projections were estimated based on the projected average day
production. Historically, average summer day production was about 125% of average day
production The projection shown in Exhibit 4-2 and Table 4-1 assumes this trend will continue.
The Puget Sound Region expenenced a winter drought, that led to water supply shortages in
2001 The Kent City Council declared a Water Shortage Emergency, which was effective from
April 17 through October 1 of 2001 Watering restrictions were implemented during this time.
This directly impacted Kent's production as shown on Exhibit 4-2 and Table 4-1, reducing
average day production by 8% Average summer day and peak day productions were reduced by
16%, because restrictions, such as lawn watering restrictions, take effect during the summer
period. As Exhibit 4-2 and Table 4-1 show, average production did not return to previous levels
in 2002, although peak day production was higher than that of 2000 The economic down turn
that began in 2001 and continued through 2002 also affected water use and production in those
years
Table 4-2 contains the total production for each month of 2000 This displays the seasonal
pattern of demand, on a system-wide basis.
In 2000, average per capita water production for the entire system was 141 gallons per capita per
day (gpcd) During the summer, per capita water production rose to 177 gpcd These
calculations were made using the population information presented in Table 3-1 and production
data for 2000, located in Table 4-2 For residential consumption alone, water use was 203
Section 4-Water Use Characteristics in City of Kent Service Area 4-3
City of Kent ken✓t4)3 Ii2kpL «
June 3,2003
gallons per household per day (gphd) in the single-family category, and 160 gphd in the multi-
family category. Using an estimated number of 2 5 persons per household, these residential
sector water uses amount to approximately 81 gpcd (single-family) and 64 gpcd (multi-family.)
Table 4.2
Monthly Production - sir
Month Production(gallons)
January 223531,000
February 203,137,000
March 216,964,000
April 204,004,000
May 264,142,000
June 279,552,000
July 349,261,000
August 371,734,000
September 285,405,000
October 255,564,000
November 216,605,000
December 202,497,000
4.3 Non-Revenue Water
Non-revenue water is water that is produced but not billed to customers. This can include a
variety of beneficial uses, such as flushing of water mains, firefighting, reservoir maintenance,
and treatment plant uses, as well as system losses from leakage, unauthorized uses, etc Exhibit
4-3 displays non-revenue water Before 1997, more than 10% of water produced was non-
revenue This has been reduced over the years, and in 2002, less than 5% of water produced was
non-revenue. Based on EES' expenence, it is not unusual for water systems to have non-revenue
water in the range of 10-15% Kent's non-revenue water is very low by comparison
Where data are available, non-revenue water can be separated into two categories- accounted-for
and unaccounted-for This breakdown was provided for 2000, 2001 and 2002 Kent indicates
that the amount of non-revenue water that can be accounted for represents water used for
draining and cleaning reservoirs, during repair of mains, backwashing of the treatment plant,
flushing, sewer and storm cleaning, fire department testing, and a leak in the Kent Springs
Transmission Main The leak, which is estimated to be about 55 gallons per minute, composes
on average 83% of the annual accounted-for non-revenue water since 1999.
The total non-revenue data were included in an untitled tabular information summarizing
residential, commercial, and unaccounted for water (1993 - 1999) provided by Kent in March
2003 Kent included additional detail in supporting information to a spreadsheet entitled "Kent
water supply pipeline 5 stars 3 "
Section 4-Water use Characteristics in City of Kent Service Area 4-4
City of Kent tr„v2 nr i i2k,�
June 3, 2003
Exhibit 4-3
Amount of Revenue and Non-Revenue Produced
100%
90% -
80% - -
e
70% --
v
ao` 60% ■Accounted for Non-Revenu
i
` 0 Unaccounted for
50% ❑Total Non-Revenue
3
40% - - ® Revenue Water Produced
`o 30% - --
20% - - -
10% -
0%
gob �90� 950 1AOb 9q 19Cb 90'9 001 00L
ti ti ti
Year
4.4 Water Demand by Customer Class
Kent, through their billing system, has separated their customers into classes according to type of
customer, location (inside or outside of Kent city limits), and type of use (spnnkler and non-
spnnkler) Accounts have been separated into these categones
Commercial/Residential/Business Residential with home business
Commercial General. Strip malls and businesses
Industnal Manufacturing
Multi-Family Residential Apartment complexes with more than 4 units
Single Family Residential Single family housing
Duplex Apartment complexes with 4 units or less
LifeLme Residential, low income senior rates
City of Kent. All City facilities
Government King County facilities
School Schools (15 served by Kent)
An especially important aspect of investigating potential conservation options is an
understanding of how water is used These customer classes provide further insight into which
measures should be considered for implementation. Exhibit 4-4 presents graphs showing the %
of all water sold to each customer class for all of 2000 and summer of 2000 (June through
Section 4•Water Use Characteristics in City of Kent Service Area 4-5
City of Kent k=n� 3-1 12A3 m
June 3, 2003
. September) The figure shows all of the water used inside and outside city limits and sprinkler
and non-sprinkler use for the four primary customer classes and an "other" category The tables
below each graph present a further break-down of the customer classes within the "other"
category As the exhibit demonstrates, the proportion of water used by each customer class
changes very little during the summer in comparison with year-round use. This indicates that
most of Kent's water customers increase their water use during the summer and that all
customers could be targeted for reducing peak season use In 2000, 98% of water sold was used
within the city limits of Kent
Exhibit 4-4
Comparison of Water Sold During 2000 to Water Sold During Summer 2000 by Customer Class,
Year 2000 Water Sold-Customer Class Summer,Year 2000 Water Sold-Customer Class
7%
6%
■Commercial General
aCommecal Geneal 33%23(1132%
23% 0 Irdustral
■Inoustnal
O Mufi-Family
❑Multi-Family
D Single Family 0Single Family
■Other
■Other
9%
30% 28%
'Other'Cat -Summer
-Other'Ca a -Full Year %o Total
%of Total Customer Class Revenue
Customer Close Revenue ommercal/Resdenhall
ommercal/Resideneal) Business 07%
Business 08% Du lax 02%
Duplex 03% LdeLme 06%
LdeLme 06% ty of Kent 19%
City of Kent 1 3%
Government 22% Gmemment 21%
.bch00 09% 1 School 12%
'Source unfilled table of customer billing Information for 2000-2001 recelve l from City of Kent 3-1603
Data used to develop the graphs in Exhibits 4-4 through 4-7 and discussed in the remainder of
this section originated from an untitled table of customer billing information for 2000 — 2002
received from Kent in March 2003 These data were provided in monthly and bi-monthly
amounts and were manipulated to produce approximate monthly water use in each category.
Attachment A provides detailed information on how the information in this discussion was
developed and provides monthly amounts of water used for each customer category in 2000
The year 2000 was selected as a benchmark because of the initiation of the SSP agreement
between parties and because it can be considered a normal year in companson with the drought
year in 2001 and the unstable economic conditions in the Puget Sound Region of 2002.
Exhibit 4-5 presents the amount of water sold, in millions of gallons, during each month of 2000.
The graph demonstrates that water increases significantly during the summer season. Forty
percent of water sold during the entire year was sold between June 1 and September 30.
Section 4-Water Use Characteristics in City of Kent Service Area 4-6
City of Kent .naa-03 uvm.ux,
June 3, 2003
Exhibit
2000 Total Water
Sold'
350
352 - - - -- - - - ---
300 -_
275
250 -- - - - - - - - - —
c 225
0 175 - -- - - - -
p 150 __ -- -_ _ _ __
25
100
75
50 -
25 -
0
Month
'Source Untitled table of customer billing Informatbn for 2000-2001 receleed from Clty of Kent 3-111-03
The graphs in Exhibit 4-6 (all) and Exhibit 4-7 (a, b, and c) present monthly water sales during
2000 to the four largest classes of water users (Commercial General, Industnal, Multi-Family
Residential, and Single Family Residential) and the City, Government, and Schools, respectively
The summer months have been delineated in each of the graphs. As discussed earlier, each of
these graphs shows that water use increases significantly in the summer for all customer classes.
Since Kent is focused on reducing their production during the summer months, an evaluation of
outdoor water use, which occurs primarily in the summer is valuable Some customer classes
have meters to track irrigation water use separately from indoor water use. Graphs in Exhibits
4-6 and 4-7 present information on monthly general and irrigation metered use Exhibit 4-7(d)
presents the monthly lawn irrigation use for the Commercial General, Industnal, Multi-family,
City of Kent, and Schools during 2000 Exhibit 4-7(d) shows the same irrigation meter data as
that in the graphs in Exhibit 4-6 and 4-7 (a, b, and c) However, this exhibit presents a customer
class comparison of irrigation water use This exhibit does not capture the irrigation use of some
categories, such as single family residential, because all water use is tracked by a single meter for
these customers Additionally, not all customers in the classes shown in Exhibit 4-7(d) have an
irrigation meter. The largest users of sprinklers were the Commercial General, Multi-family, and
City of Kent
Section 4•Water Use Characteristics in City of Kent Service Area 4-7
City of Kent kr.✓ 03 112k�m
June 3, 2003
Exhibit 4-6
2000 Monthly Water Sold-Largest Customer Classes'
20So
p 1
fl
a0 - fil 20 - - - --- --- — -
M
0 I all
p
e 0e -, fir, y Fi 4 .1 4
f F �'ip FJ �Y p �;, 6r e� Ct'
< MOnlll Monte
•r urN Mure�w.r Mnr •Cgatl M9s eYr✓plm AYlo
a)Commercial General Class b)Industrial Class
+w
>� p
0 I ra.a
c)Multi-Family Residential Class d)Single Family Residential Class(general
meters only)
'Source Unfilled table of CYdibmer bliling Information for 2000-2001 received from City of Kent 3-18-03
As expected, the graph indicates that maximum spnnkler water use occurs dunng the summer
season In 2000, 78% of spnnkler water use occurred between June I and September 30.
Metered imgation use represented 7 5% of water sold dunng August and 3% of all water sold
dunng 2000.
Section 4.Water Use Characteristics in City of Kent Service Area 4-8
City of Kent tr,arz-g�lfzhyaa�.
June 3, 2003
Exhibit
2000 Water Sold-Other Customer Classes and Lawn Irrigations
,
erw a r` ••••J'a r V ✓ >P +`° if F � d`
a)City of Kent b)Government Class(general meters
only)
2
R:
10
- °
• �`` �r S' +` s'` s` op N.r 6,• r ti •read•vT aP,ttf` �`'' tf'4e� 6` .�o`•�
•,+ „mw Mahn
•�•�•a,JwT,Ms wGYnn✓Fnl Ge„aY pMiIIKeTJ/a Uy tl Itw,p M,fuWl as..
c)Schools d)Lawn Irrigation*
'Source Untitled table of customer billing Information for 2000-2001 received From City of Kent 3-13.03
'Repeals data from Exhibit 4-6(a,b,and c)and Exhibit 4 7 is and C)
Section 4-Water Use Characteristics in City of Kent Service Area 4.9
City of Kent trm2-oitmd.,.
June 3,2003
Section
• Conservation
5.1 Conservation Activities Addressing Customer Use
Kent began its conservation program in 1993 The first year, the program consisted of public
education, distribution of conservation kits, implementing metering on all accounts, leak
detection, and the first seasonal pricing structure Table 5-1 summarizes Kent's conservation
efforts since 1993 and their future conservation plans Kent's original goals were to decrease
water use by 6 5% between 1993 and 1995 and to realize an 8% reduction between 1993 and
2000
According to Kent's 2002 Water System Plan (draft), water use per connection, including all
customer classes, decreased by 12% between 1993 and 1999. However, a comprehensive
evaluation of savings attributable to water conservation program has not been performed
Evaluating water use of single family accounts may provide better control to determine whether
use per account is increasing or decreasing, though it does not present the entire picture for Kent.
Exhibit 5-1 presents consumption per account for Kent's single family accounts from 1993 —
2001 As the graph shows, in most years, consumption per account decreased Between 1993
and 2000, per account consumption decreased by about 9 gallons per day per account, or lust
over 4% An additional reduction occurred from 2000 to 2001 However, 2001 was a drought
year, and regional publicity as well as local watering restrictions were likely to be a significant,
short-term factor in consumption for that year
Kent's current goal is to reduce average water use per connection by 2% per year As part of the
Second Supply Project Agreement, Kent is working with the other members of the agreement to
reduce per capita summer water production by 10% collectively between years 2000 and 2010
In addition to measures shown on the table, the City conducted water audits of the 20 largest
commercial/industrial water users in 2002 These audits provided customers with a summary of
potential conservation measures and recommendations to proceed with a more detailed audit or
to proceed directly with implementation of the measures The results of this study for selected
customers are discussed later in Section 6 2 1.
Kent sets aside funds in its budgets specifically for public education, technical assistance, system
measures, and incentives and/or other measures associated with its conservation program.
Between 1997 and 2002, annual allocations for the program have ranged from $11,600 to
$93,000. The budget for 2003 through 2005 has already been established as well, with
allocations of about $44,000 on average for each year These allocations also include the
designation of funds for a 50% full time equivalent staff(FI'E)
Section 5-Existing Conservation Program 5-1
City of Kent k..0- 31121 ,
June 3,2003
Table 5-1
City of Kent's Conservation Program Summary
Measures 1993-2000 2001 2002.2010
Pubbc educabonAnformabon
Newsletter Four times per year Three times per year Occasionally
Water hotline-status of water
supply/restrictions Ongoing Ongoing
Consumption history on bill Implemented 1998 Ongoing Ongoing
Water bill inserts-conservation Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing
programs/incentives,etc
Demonstration garden(2)
native plant demonstration Constructed 2000 Ongoing Ongoing
low water use plants/drip Construction 2001 Ongoing
irrigation demonstration site
Media advertising Run newspaper ads Ongoing Ongoing
Public events/library displays Numerous events Ongoing Ongoing
School education programs Classroom presentations Ongoing Ongoing
In concert with the environment Ongoing Ongoing
School water festival(initiated year 2000) Ongoing Ongoing
Newspaper articles Provide to newspapers Ongoing Ongoing
Landscape seminars Held for customers Planning phase
Informational brochures Produce&r1istributed numerous Ongoing Ongoing
Brochures
Landscapedrngation system 1998 revised landscape code Ongoing Ongoing
guidelines To include native vegetation and
Low water use vegetation
Vehicle billboard program Researched Planning phase
Lawn watering calendar Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing
Distribution of conservation kits Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing
Rate structure
Seasonal water rates Began 1999 Ongoing Ongoing
section 5-Existing Conservation Program 5-2
City of Kant t.nvz 03 irvcp�mr
June 3,2003
Table 5-1 (cont)
City of Kent's Conservation Program Summary
Measures 1993-2000 2001 2002-2010
Sir residential-indoor
Toilet tank displacement device Distributed 1,500 Distribute 1,000 yearly
Low-flow showerheads Distributed 2,000 Distributed 500 in 2002
Distribute 500 per year
High-efficiency toilets 147 rebates 0 $50 46 rebates 0 $50 88 rebates 0 $50 thru
March 2003--100 rebates
Per year through 2010
Distributed 1,000 in 2002
Low-flow faucet aerators Distributed 2,000 and
500 per year thru 2010
Horizontal-axis clothes washers 116 rebates® $50 68 rebates 0 $50 90 rebates 0 $50 in 2002
36 rebates 0 $75 in 2003
100 rebates per year
thru 2010
Sf residential-outdoor
Irrigation-rain sensors/shut off Distributed 350 Distribute 350 until gone
Rain barrels/rain pails Distributed 385 Distributed 400 in 2002 and
Distribute 400 per year as
grant funding allows
Landscape audits 25 per year beginning
in 2004
Rainwater harvesting Passage of ordinance by
City council&installation
Of rainwater harvesting in
New construction by 2005
Mf residential-indooNoutdoor
Low-flow showerheads Distributed 500 Distribute 500-1000 yearly
Low-flow faucet aerators Distributed 500 Distribute 500-1000 yearly
High-efficiency toilets 500 per year replacement
Offer$100 rebate
Non-residential-indoor
Kent schools toilet replacement 12 rebates for waterless 100 urinals/toilets planned
Urinals 0$50 each $100 rebate per item
Section 5-Existing Conservation Program 5-3
City of Kent t.n,no3 uv�'m
June 3,2003
Table 5-1 (cont)
City of Kent's Conservation Program Summary
Measures 1993.2000 2001 2002.2010
Miscellaneous replacements in Utility financed retrofit(up
Commercial sector to 50%of cost)to replace
low-flow toilets,urinals,
faucets, refrigeration,
cooling,laundry,
ice machines,etc
Senior activity center retrofit Completed
Included new,water
efficient,low-flow fixtures
and devices, including
infrared devices
City of Kent facilities Complete 2002,
included new,water
efficient, low-flow fixtures
and devices
Non-residential-outdoor
Irrigation reduction-Kent school Year 2000 cut back on Ongoing Ongoing
District Irrigation,and plan to
Reduce areas irrigated
Irrigation meters-schools Most schools have Ongoing Ongoing
Landscape assessments targeting
high use customers Implemented Ongoing
Rain sensors/shutoff valve Distributed 50 Ongoing Ongoing
City of Kent irrigated facilities
(such as parks)retrofit Complete 2002
Including new,water
efficient,low-flow fixtures
and devices
Section 5-Existing Conservation Program 5-4
City of Kent k°°'rz'°3 i ism`°
June 3,2003
. Exhibit 5.1
Consumption per Single Family Account 1993-2001
� 250 -
'o
T 200 - - -- - - - -�
E
wa 150 - - - --- -
c c
y O
i 100 - - - - - - --
o I
a 50 - - -
E
a
c
U 0
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
Year
Source Untitled table summarizing residential and commercial accounts,received from City of Kent,March 2003
Note There u a discrepancy between 1994 and 1995 but these data can not be reviewed to determine the cause
5.2 Water System Measures to Improve Efficiency
In addition to implementing the City's Conservation Program and assessing conservation
possibilities at City facilities, Kent's system maintenance has contributed to their ability to use
water efficiently In fact, many of these activities are responsible for Kent's low percentage of
unaccounted for, non-revenue water production
Table 5-2 describes the types of activities Kent has implemented which will result in long-term
savings due to system maintenance These savings are difficult to quantify because many of
these activities could be considered "preventive" in that they are implemented on an ongoing
basis to reduce, among other problems, leaks in the water system Many of these activities are
performed before a serious problem occurs
Section 5-Existing Conservation Program 5-5
City of Kent k as 03 1
June 3,2003
Table 5.2
City of Kent's Water System Measures that Lead to More Efflelent Water Use
Measure Description •
Water main leak detection a This is an annual program,which began in 1991
• Some significant leaks that have been repaired
Kent Springs Transmission Main
-1997-Approx 200 gpm leak repaired
Water Infrastructure Replacements/Improvements a Significant replacements and improvements of Kent's
mains have been ongoing
Hydrant use a Use of hydrants is required to be metered
Improved tracking of non-revenue water . An on-going program
Meter testing-3-inches and larger,Source meters,and a Meters are tested annually
Intertie meters
Preventive maintenance programs 0 Infrastructure Management System has been
implemented to track component inventory
e Record maintenance history, preventive maintenance
work on Kent's infrastructure have been developed
Facility visits for observation of overall condition . Water Sources and Pump Stations- visited daily
while in operation
e Storage reservoirs- weekly visits
e Pressure Reducing Valves-inspected monthly with
annual maintenance
Section 5-Existing Conservation Program 5-5
City of Kent r•n✓t-03-ovryndoc
June 3, 2003
•
Conservation • of
'Service Area
This section provides an assessment of the potential for additional water use reductions in Kent
between 2003 and 2010 This includes further implementation of conservation programs that are
already underway by Kent, as well as potential new program elements that could be developed
targeting additional water uses
6.1 General Residential and Commercial Conservation
Measures
Table 6-1 presents the results of the Conservation Potential Assessment for 72 different
measures For measure descriptions, see Appendix B The table has been divided into indoor
and outdoor measure for single family, multi-family, and commercial general classes. Measures
targeting plumbing fixtures and landscape uses for the industrial customer class are included
with the commercial general figures in Table 6-1 Because of the variability among customers in
the industrial sector, measures targeting industrial process water are discussed later in this
section and have been assessed separately
Each measure included four types of evaluations participation of households (for residential
measures) or employees (for commercial general measures), estimated water savings available
through implementing each measure, cost of implementing each measure, and a combination of
water savings and financial costs of each measure.
Table 6-1 presents an abbreviated version of the parameters calculated for each measure The
parameters shown here were selected because they are of greatest significance to Kent. These
parameters are presented
Parameter Details
Affects existing and/or E = Existing
future customers F= Future
Total target households by Consists only of those households or employees to whom the
end of planning period measure applies and who have not already implemented the
(2010) measure Determined by demographic information (i e , number
of single family households), estimates of those able to
participate (i e households with dishwashers), adjusted for those
already participating in given measure, and accounting for future
growth to year 2010.
Target as % of total Number of target households or employees divided by total
households number of households or employees served by Kent.
Section 6-Conservation Potential within City of Kent Service Area 6-1
City of Kent k,n� 03 iiaq.m
June 3,2003
Parameter Details
Participation rate (% of target that Estimate of percentage of target households or employees
participates) that would be willing to participate if the measure is
implemented and suitable incentives are available.
Achievement of this rate would require appropriate outreach,
rebates, and financial incentives related to rates and
metering
Total participating households Resulting estimate of target households or employees which
are likely to participate in measure.
Savings per participating Water savings were extrapolated from previous regional
household or employee in season studies and were adjusted, to the extent possible for
measure is effective (gpd) application in this study.
Year-round water savings (mgd) Estimated daily water savings averaged over entire year
Peak Season water savings (mgd) Estimated daily water savings averaged from June 1 to
September 31
Average total cost per year Costs were extrapolated from previous regional studies and
were adjusted, to the extent possible, for application in this
study. Estimated costs include all costs of implementing
the measure, without regard to whether cost is paid by the
utility or the customer Cost estimates include hardware,
outreach, and program administration. Outreach and
administrative costs were pro-rated among all measures
targeting similar groups, to avoid overlap in costs
Average Cost ($$/1000 gal) for Per-unit cost estimate for year-round water savings
year-round savings
Average Cost ($$/1000 gal) for peak Per-unit cost estimate summer season savings (water saved
season savings from June I to September 31)
All costs and water savings were derived from the 2001 Central Puget Sound Regional Water
Supply Outlook conservation evaluation This assessment of conservation options covered
Snohomish, King, and Pierce counties. Many of the costs and water savings estimates contained
in the Outlook assessment originated from Seattle Public Utilities' 1998 Conservation Potential
Assessment and City of Everett's 2000 Water System Plan Some adjustments were made from
the data used in the Outlook
■ Costs and water saved were adjusted for a 7-year planning period.
■ Water savings realized by implementing measures affecting imgation were reduced by 20%
to reflect Kent's land use, which is denser and generally has less landscaping than the three-
county region as a whole. The reduced savings are consistent with the Seattle Public Utilities
estimates for its own Conservation Potential Assessment
Section 6-Conservation Potential within City of Kent Service Area 6.2
City of Kent keno!03 112/c m.
! f!�| ; § ! ; | ; ; ; | | : ! ! | ; l ; ; ; ; | § ■ : ;l .l , . . ; . , : . . = , . . r § § _ . , . . . § B ;
kill_
, Z ,12,
§ �f
f It It
;3
" ��� ■ , � , ! l ; � � � ; ; ! ! ! ; ■ ! � � ! ! �
; ; R§ . = � Ir ! ■ ! � ! , ! „ ! , : _ ! § , � `
) � �!! . . ! ! ! ! ! ! ! . . . 1 , � ! ! . ! , ■
! • � ! � } � ! , | §
! � § ' � � ! ! ! � , | | ' � ` ! | { | |• {� �� {
| ( ! I § !
� • , • ! ! ! ! ! |! | ff ! ! ! ! ! ! ffl . ! | | !
Section 6-Conservation Potential within City o Kent Service Area 6-3
City of_, __„_
!
§ hIf ) ) ) \ \ §
; ! R | �
|
!
! |�
. . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . .
f|I ! ! , � „ E ! , ° � ! ! : ! ■ , : _ , , ,
. ' �|;!�
-IL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ;
_ l� � = ; ; � ; ; ; ! ! ■ , l � , , ! ! , ,
\) ( 122 ; 2AAAAA � !
| � ���1 , ; ; � ; [ ■ ■ ■ � ! ! ! , ! ; !
-
� �
! ■ ! ! , ! | f ! ' ! ,
. ,
3ec_6-Co___ _____City of Kent__.Area 6-4
City eKent _w._
, - -
2 N Fj -
|f -
, �
! �
! �e,I
! ; $�f� . � ! ! � ! ! ■ ; � ; I � l � E - E � ; _ !
l ! ! | ! | ! | ! | ! | ! ! ! |
� | | . ! ! ! ! , . - . , lf . f | • � ! ! |
Section--Conservation Potential within City of Kent Service Area 6-
City of_. _03 .�
June 3,2003
■ Costs of measure implementation were increased from the Outlook values, to reflect reduced
economies of scale that Kent may experience compared with the region as a whole. The
increased cost is consistent with the Seattle Public Utilities estimates for its own
Conservation Potential Assessment.
■ Costs were adjusted to reflect inflation between 1998 and 2003
An additional concept represented in the analysis made in Table 6-1 is that of the "free rider"
For each measure, an estimate has been made of the accounts that would implement a given
measure during the planning period whether or not Kent provides any incentives or outreach for
this measure in their conservation program These accounts will likely take advantage of any
financial incentives or hardware provided by Kent's conservation program However, they do
not add to overall water savings realized through Kent's conservation efforts because these
customers would implement that measure even if Kent had not provided the incentive This has
been reflected in the costs and water savings presented in Table 6-1 All estimates of costs
include free nders, but estimates of water savings do not include free riders
Table 6-1 represents a combination of information from Kent personnel as well as assumptions
made in other regional efforts to evaluate conservation options and information derived from
other conservation sources. As such, this analysis provides a comprehensive comparison of
conservation measures that would be applicable in Kent's service area. However, the
extrapolated values, especially for costs, may vary somewhat from values that would occur in the
Kent area for each individual measure Prior to implementing selected options, further
refinement of financial costs and estimated savings should be performed for budgeting and other
purposes
Table 6-1 represents an evaluation based upon extrapolation from the other sources documented
However, the following items note where savings or costs results may be less reliable than
others
■ Measure 57, Improved Cooling Systems, is applied in a manner that indicates that year-round
water savings are equal to those realized during the summer season This is because the
original source material' included not only air conditioning systems used in the summer, but
refrigeration and ice units, which are used year-round.
■ Single Family and Multi-Family outdoor measures have the same estimates of water savings
per participating unit even though yard areas per participating unit is likely to be significantly
higher for single family households than multi-family households. This is because the
original source material' provided a composite of savings for both types of residential
households.
6.2 Conservation Measures Associated with Industrial
Processes
For purposes of this Conservation Potential Assessment, water savings associated with industrial
processes are estimated separately from the conservation measures listed in Table 6-1. This is
i Conservation Potential Assessment,Seattle Public Utilities, 1998
Section 6-Conservation Potential within City of Kent Service Area 6-6
City of Kent k,.✓-03
June 3, 2003
because water uses, conservation potential, and cost/benefit ratios are highly specific to each
industry and facility, depending on the nature of the process, type of equipment, depreciation on
physical plant and other factors. It should be noted that domestic and landscape opportunities for
industrial customers are included in the estimates shown in Table 6-1 However, industrial
process water is addressed separately in this section.
The City of Kent has substantial industrial activity, making this an important component of
overall conservation potential Approximately 9% of the City's water sales are to customers
classified as industrial This amounts to approximately 725,000 gpd on an average year round
basis, and 900,000 gpd during the summer months Industrial activities are highly diverse,
including aerospace (The Boeing Company), bottling, food processing, building products,
manufacture of specialized equipment, finishing, industrial gases, sand and gravel. It is
estimated that approximately 18,000 employees worked in the manufactunng sector within the
City of Kent in year 20002 The City also has a large component of warehousing and distribution
services
6.2.1 Estimated Water Savings for Industrial Process Water
Based on experiences in other cities throughout the United States, industrial facilities can
offer significant potential for water conservation Industrial activities are one component
of what is known as the Industrial, Commercial and Institutional (ICI) sector Based on
review of case studies and audit reports, Vickers reports typical savings potential of 15 to
. 35% at ICI facilities in general3, with payback penods ranging from a few months to a
few years A report from the New Mexico Office of the State Engineer offers similar
findings, with water savings at some facilities exceeding 50%4. It should be noted that
these estimates include commercial facilities and institutional facilities, in addition to
industrial facilities. Moreover, these estimates include water saved from retrofit or
replacement of domestic plumbing fixtures such as toilets, as well as water savings from
landscaping and turf management Even so, there are many examples of dramatic water
savings involving process water use efficiency Tacoma Water, Seattle Public Utilities
and the Portland Water Bureau have all found substantial benefits in addressing water use
efficiency with their industrial customers
The City of Kent has performed water conservation audits on a number of industrial
customers, as part of a program offering audits to the City's 20 largest water users
Industrial facilities that had water conservation audits performed included
■ Boeing
■ Air Liquide
■ Oberto Sausage Co
■ Pure Water Corp.
■ Bakery Chef, Inc.
■ Northstar Beverage
t 2002 King County Annual Growth Report
3 Vickers,Amy, Water Use and Conservation,Waterplow Press,2001
New Mexico Office of State Engineer,A Water Conservation Guide for Commercial, institutional and industrial
Users, 1999
Section 6-Conservation Potentiai within City of Kent Service Area 6-7
City of Kent k.,,,a-oyii,km„
June 3,2003
■ Flow International
■ Mikron Industries
■ Western Insulfoam
Results of the audits indicated water savings potential in many industrial processes such
as cooling of equipment used in manufacturing processes, water filter backflushing,
reverse osmosis purification, vehicle washing, production washdown and rinsing,
defrosting of frozen foods, and clothes washing It is likely that audits of additional
facilities would identify further opportunities in these areas, as well as other types of
water-using processes. The water audits of industrial facilities were preliminary scoping
audits, and did not estimate specific volumes of water savings, nor did they provide
information on costs
In the absence of specific data on savings and costs, a more general estimation procedure
will be used for this Conservation Potential Assessment. Based on the information
reported above, it is assumed that water savings potential in the industrial sector is on the
order of 25% (midpoint of 15 to 35% estimate reported above) However, a significant
component of these savings is associated with domestic plumbing fixtures and landscape
irrigation, which were already estimated in Table 6-1 of this report. Therefore it is
assumed that the quantity of water savings that could be achieved solely through
improvements in industrial processes is reduced to approximately 10 to 15% If the more
conservative value of 10% is used, this amounts to the following amount of water
savings.
■ Year round savings 10% x 725,000 gpd = 72,500 gpd
■ Summer season savings; 10% x 900,000 gpd= 90,000 gpd
Based on the summer season average daily demand of 14 48 mgd projected for year 2010
(see Table 4-1), this amounts to 0.6% of total summer season production in year 2010
6.2.2 Estimated Costs for Conservation Involving Industrial
Process Water
The costs of achieving water savings from industrial processes can vary widely. Data on
costs was not provided by the audits described above Therefore, an alternative
estimation procedure was used based on data from two metropolitan areas in the Pacific
Northwest
SPU reported expenditures of $567,000 on "commercial process" conservation measures
in year 2002 Estimated long-term savings from this program were 246,000 gpd This
equates to approximately $2.30 for every gpd of water savings. SPU reported
comparable values for year 2001. In that year, expenditures were $710,000 and estimated
water saved was 550,000 gpd This equates to $1.29 per gpd of water savings5.
s Seattle Public Utilities,Regional 1%Water Conservation Program,Annual Reports for years 2001 (issued May
2002) and 2002(issued March 2003)
Section 6-Conservation Potential within City of Kent Service Area 6-8
City of Kent k�^ _03 1lv/paJ
June 3,2003
The Regional Water Providers Consortium recently evaluated a rang 3 e of water
conservation programs for water service areas in the Portland, Oregon area Two of the
19 programs evaluated are relevant to this discussion of water conservation in the
industrial sector
■ Commercial, Industrial and Institutional (CII7) Audits, which targets CII accounts in
the top 15% of annual use, as well as accounts experiencing a sharp increase in water
use These audits include industrial processes, but also other conservation measures
such as domestic plumbing fixtures and landscape irrigation
■ Eliminate Single-Pass Cooling, targeting equipment such as refrigeration, air
conditioning and ice machines
Using the results presented in the Consortium report, an estimate was denved for the
costs per gpd of water savings The costs for these two programs are shown on Table
6-2.
Table 6-2
Unit Costs Derived from Consortium Report
Unit Cost Unit Cost
Measure ($$/gpd) ($$/1000 gal)
CII Audits $3.90/gpd 036
Eliminate Single Pass Cooling $0 21lgpd 002
While these costs are not wholly industrial process costs, they are informative in
assessing potential costs for the industrial sector
In summary, significant water savings can potentially be achieved by addressing
industrial processes in the Kent service area For comparison with the values for other
types of measures presented in Table 6-1, potential water savings are on the order of
72,500 gpd year round and 90,000 gpd in the summer season Costs estimated in other
studies for the Seattle and Portland regions vary widely, but appear to be on the order of
$0 02 per gpd to $0 36 per 1,000 gallons Achieving these savings would likely require a
considerable effort in terns of site-specific analysis, or incentives to industrial customers
6.3 Avoided Cost Comparison
Some basis is needed for determining which water conservation measures are cost effective. For
purposes of this Conservation Potential Assessment the "avoided cost' associated with
conserving water was calculated Avoided cost means the financial savings to the City when
customers use less water. For this study, the avoided cost was defined as the variable cost
associated with producing an additional 1,000 gallons of water during the summer season, plus
the variable cost associated with sewer flows Since the cost of sewerage disposal is
considerably higher than the cost of providing drinking water, the sewerage component has a
large impact on the results
°Davis,William and William Christensen, Update of the Regional Water Supply Plan Conservation Element,2003
'Note The Consortium uses "CIP'instead of"ICI"
Section 6-Conservation Potential within City of Kent Service Area 6-9
City of Kent i IV"�
June 3,2003
For the water production component of avoided cost, City of Kent staff provided data on costs of
pumping and treatment for the City's various sources of supply The sources used to meet
additional needs in the summer are generally more costly than the sources that provide base
flows year round These more expensive sources include Armstrong S�nngs ($0.09 per 1,000
gallons), the Soos Creek Well ($0.29 per 1,000 gallons) and the 212` site ($0.22 per 1,000
gallons). The average cost of these three sources is $0 20 per 1,000 gallons of water produced.
This is the variable cost of pumping (energy) and treatment (chemicals) only, and does not
include capital costs associated with these facilities. Variable labor costs were not estimated for
this purpose but are likely relatively small since staff costs do not vary substantially when less
water is produced.
Water to be delivered through the Second Supply Project will be considerably less costly than
these three sources. City staff indicated a cost of $0.02 per 1,000 gallons from this source.
Assuming this source is on line in 2010, the cost of water from the SSP would be the appropriate
comparison However, in this CPA the more conservative avoided cost of $0 20 per 1,000
gallons will be used to establish cost effectiveness of conservation actions.
Since the City also pays for sewer flows to King County Metro, this represents an additional
component of avoided cost that should be considered This component is considerably larger
than the water production component For sewer service, the City collects a variable charge of
$4 17 per hundred cubic feet from utility customers This is measured based on the water meter
for each customer, using a 1.1 ratio of water use and sewer flow Converting this value yields a
result of$5.57 per 1,000 gallons
Based on this information, the total avoided cost of conserved water used for comparison
purposes is $5 57 + $0 20 = $5 77 per 1,000 gallons The sewer component is 97% of this total.
The total avoided cost has been rounded to yield $6 00 per 1,000 gallons
6.4 Screening by Cost-effectiveness and Water Savings
It should be noted that some of the measures that pass the cost-effectiveness test above yield
little water savings, while other measures offer substantially higher savings It is suggested that,
for screening purposes, measures that are cost effective and produce savings of more than 5,000
gpd on a summer season basis be the primary focus for purposes of achieving the savings targets
in the MOA
Combining the cost effectiveness threshold of$6 00 per 1,000 gallons in the peak season, and the
savings threshold of 5,000 gpd in the peak season, there are 28 of the 72 measures that are cost
effective and appear to offer the best opportunities for water conservation These measures, and
their water savings and annual costs are listed in Table 6-3
9 One ccf=748 gallons 1,000 gallons is 33 7% higher than 748 gallons Therefore,the unit cost in$$per ccf was
raised by this amount to yield$$per thousand gallons
Section 6-Conservation Potential within City of Kent Service Area 6.10
City of Kent k..✓-v 112)p c
June 3,2003
Total potential savings for this suite of conservation measures are 614,000 gpd year round and
834,000 gpd during the summer season. Since summer season production is projected to be
14 48 mgd in year 2010 (see Table 3-1), this represents water savings of approximately 5.8% by
year 2010
Table 6-3
Measures Offering the Greatest Conservation Opportunities
Year Round Peak Season Peak Season
Savings Savings Unit Cost
# Measure (1,OOOs gpd) (1,OOOs gpd) ($/1,000 gal.)
Single Family Residential Indoor
5 Efficient Clothes washers 66 66 $5 64
6 Decreased faucet use 10 10 $0 62
7 Decreased shower use 14 14 $0 45
8 Eliminate partial clothes washer loads 9 9 $0 88
10 Decrease toilet flushes 1 I 11 $0 77
Single Family Residential Outdoor
11 Irrigation system improvements 5 14 $3 18
12 Improved irrigation scheduling 2 7 $0 87
15 Automatic rain shutoff devices 2 5 $3 27
25 Allow lawn to go dormant 8 25 $0 21
Multi family Residential Indoor
30 Efficient clothes washers 66 66 $5 64
31 Decreased faucet use 16 16 $0 62
32 Decreased shower use 23 23 $0 45
33 Eliminate partial clothes washer loads 6 6 $0 88
35 Decrease toilet flushes 13 13 $0 77
Multi family Residential Outdoor
36 Irrigation system improvements 30 91 $3 18
37 Improved irrigation scheduling 16 48 $0 87
38 Efficient landscape design 2 5 $1 99
40 Automatic ram shutoff devices 13 40 $3 27
42 Improved swimming pool use 4 11 $0 19
48 Allow lawn to go dormant 16 47 $0 21
Commercial Indoor
52 Low volume toilets and urinals 88 88 $l 66
53 Efficient clothes washing 50 50 $2 82
55 Leak detection and repair 13 13 $3 45
57 Improved cooling systems 94 94 $2 02
58 Install waterless urinals 24 24 250
Commercial Outdoor
61 Irrigation system improvements 2 5 $3 07
64 Weather based irrigation controls 9 27 $2 07
71 Single-pass decorative water features 2 6 $0 09
Total Potential Water Savings 614 834 NIA
Section 6-Conservation Potential within City of Kent service Area 6.11
City of Kent ksnV2 03 l oky ,c
June 3,2003
6.5 Conservation Savings Realized Through Water Efficient
Plumbing Code
6.5.1 Residential Code Savings
An additional source of water savings are cumulative savings that will accrue as new
construction and remodeling activity occur within Kent's service area Due to the 1993
Plumbing Code, which took effect in 1994, all new toilets, showerheads, and faucets
installed throughout Washington must meet water-use efficiency standards This has the
gradual effect of reducing the level of demand per household Based on the proportion of
housing built before 1994 and after 1994 in the Kent service area, an estimate was
developed of the incremental effect of these "code savings" between years 2000 and
2010
In Table 6-4, the amount of water used for flushing toilets in the residential sector was
estimated for 1994, 2000, and 2010 The water savings due to the plumbing code change
was assessed as well For purposes of this estimate, it was assumed that in 1994 all
toilets used about 3.5 gallons per flush (gpf), on average, and for every year after,
approximately 5% of those toilets were replaced with low-flow toilets using 16 gpf An
average of five flushes per day per person was used. In addition, it was assumed that all
new toilets installed in new residences used 1 6 gpf Therefore, by year 2000, 30% of
pre-1994 toilets would be upgraded with low-flow toilets. By year 2010, 80% of the pre-
1994 toilets would have been replaced with low-flow toilets
Based on these calculations, it is estimated that water consumption per capita used for
flushing toilets will be reduced from 12 gallons per capita per day (gpcd) in year 2003 to
9 gpcd in year 2010. This is a reduction of 3 gpcd per day Given the projected water
service area population at year 2010 of 64,135, this is equivalent to approximately
192,405 gpd in water savings in the residential sector
The 1993 Plumbing Code also required more efficient showerheads and faucets Since
the lifetime of these fixtures is on the order of 10 years, the Study Team assumes that
households existing before 1994 would replace these fixtures at a rate of 10% per year
Therefore, by 2003, 90% of all old fixtures have been replaced Between 2003 and 2010,
very little new savings will be realized through the codes affecting showerheads and
faucets9.
9 However,without this code in place,the savings realized through 1993 change in code could be lost Therefore,
maintaining this code is a significant conservation measure
Section 6-Conservation Potential within City of Kent Service Area 6-12
City of Kent 1,nW2 03-111cp.d
June 3,2003
Table 6-4
Estimate of Plumbing Code Savings from Residential Toilets
Number(%)of People using: Total Gallons
Total Old New or Flushed per Toilet Use
Year Po ulation Toilets Upgraded Toilets Da (GCPD)
1994 44,875 44,875 0 785,308 18
(]00%) (0%)
2003 60,886 24,681 36,205 721,559 12
(41%) (59%)
2010 64,135 8,975 55,160 598,342 9
(14%) (86%)
Assumptions
■ All new and upgraded toilets use 1 6 gpf
• All existing toilets that have nor been upgraded use 3 5 gpf
■ 5 flushes per day per person is estimated
Notes
GPCD=gallons per capita per day
'45%existing toilets upgraded(5%per year since 1994)
280%existing toilets upgraded(5%per year since 1994)
6.5.2 Non-residential Code Savings
In Table 6-5, the amount of water used for flushing toilets in the commercial sector was
estimated for 1994, 2000, and 2010 Since flushometer-type toilets are much more
common than tank-type toilets in the commercial sector, it was assumed that only 10% of
all employees use tank-type toilets The same assumptions were made regarding number
of gallons per flush and rate of replacement of old toilets as in residential calculations
An average of two flushes per day per employee was used in the calculationto
Based on these calculations, it is estimated that water consumption per employee used for
flushing toilets will be reduced from 5 2 gpcd in year 2003 to 3 9 gpcd in year 2010
Given the number of employees projected at year 2010, this is a water savings of
approximately 7,633 gallons per day
6.5.3 Total Code Savings
The total savings from the plumbing code estimated above amount to approximately
200,000 gpd This amount would be the same on a year round basis as during the
summer season Compared with the projected summer season production of 14 48 mgd
(see Table 4-1), this is equivalent to approximately 1 4% water savings in year 2010.
to Vickers,A,Handbook of Water Use and Conservation,2001 This value takes into account the fact that male
employees use urinals more often than toilets, and urinals are not affected by the code savings
Section 6-Conservation Potential within City of Kent service Area 6.13
City of Kent xr„vz-m ltltp x
June 3, 2003
Table 6-5
Estimate of Plumbing Code Savings from commercial Toliets
Employees Number(%)of Employees using: Total Tank Tank
Total Using Tank Old Tank New or Upgraded Gallons Flushed Toilet Use
Year Employment Toilets Toilets Tank Toilets per Da (GCPD)
1994 53,787 5,379 5,379 0 37,651 70
10% 0%
2(03 56,520 5,652 2,9583 2,69372 29,328 5.2
5% 5%
2010 58,934 5,893 1.0757 4,818 22,947 39
1 83% 1 8 17%
Assumptions
All new and upgraded toilets use 1 6 gpf
All existing toilets that have not been upgraded use 3 5 gpf
2 flushes per day per person is estimated
10%of employees use Tank toilets which this conservation measure can be applied to
GPCD=gallons per capim per day
'45%existing toilets upgraded(5%per year since 1994)
280%existing toilets upgraded(5%per year since 1994)
Section 6—Conservation Potential within City of Kent Service Area 6-14
City of Kent tend-m''12kpk °`
June 3,2003
Section
Data Required for Conservation •
SecondSupply Project
emplementation
In June of 2001, Kent, its partners in the Second Supply Project, and the State Departments of
Ecology and Health developed a methodology for evaluating conservation savings, pursuant to
the MOA discussed in the introduction to this technical memorandum The methodology
identifies specific data that each of the five utility partners will need to collect, in order to
demonstrate achievement of the MOA goals The data requirements are listed below. It is
recommended that Kent staff review current data collection and analysis procedures, and adapt
them as needed to ensure appropriate data is collected annually and stored for use in the
conservation evaluation scheduled to take place in year 2011 (retrospective to year 2010) In
addition, the required data needs to be assembled for year 2000, to provide a baseline for
comparison with year 2010 The data requirements are summarized in Table 7-1 Some
categories of data (e g population) may not be needed for every year, but should be collected, at
a minimum, for year 2000 and year 2010
Although not specifically listed in the required statistics, four additional items that may require
data collection are identified in the conservation evaluation methodology
■ First, rates are identified as a factor In order to ensure data is available to support the
evaluation, it is recommended that a rate schedule from each year (2000 — 2010) be retained
in the same file as the above data
■ Second, system practices are identified as a factor It is recommended that an annual
summary of system practices that relate to non-revenue water be produced and retained for
this purpose (e g , main flushing, reservoir management, significant repairs and replacement
of mains or transmission Imes, other infrastructure impacts, major fire-fighting events, etc.)
■ Third, weather conditions are identified as a factor Since the conservation analysis will be
compiled as a single report for all five utility partners, it would be best to work with the
remaining partners to agree on a common weather station and set of statistics to be obtained
periodically from the National Weather Service This data can then be stored by all five
partners, or by one of the partners assigned this responsibility
■ Fourth, one of the methods identified for evaluating the conservation savings involves
developing an estimate of water saved through conservation measures Therefore it is
recommended that Kent periodically develop a quantitative estimate of cumulative water
savings achieved beginning January 1, 2000 This estimate could be developed as part of a
Water System Plan Update or similar effort, if appropriate.
Collection of the data listed on a regular, sustained basis will facilitate eventual evaluation of
conservation savings in the context of the MOA conservation evaluation methodology
Section 7-Data Required for Conservation Evaluation of Second Supply Project 7-1
Agreement Implementation-City of Kent
June 3, 2003
Table 7-1
Data Requirements to Support . . Evaluation Methodology
Data Source
1. Data Automatically Required ------� -_- ------i— --
Total water use(i a production) Kent records of production and
_____ _ ___ _ _ _ _____ ___ ___ wholesale purchase
Total summer season water use(e g production from May 1 to September 30. Kent records of production and
_or other-enod defined ioui lit by SSP p ners) __ wholesale purchase_
- ------ - ---- -------
_Total population __ __,__ __ Census or PS_RC_
Per-capita water use(total use dmded bypopulation) _ _ Calculated from above data
-- -- -- - ---- - - - - - - ---------
_Per-cpna summer season water use_ _ C_alculated_from above data _
Total Residential water use(annual and summer season) _ _Kent billing hem
_Sm&-ffarmlrresidenual_water use(annual-and summer season) Kent-billing system
___ ___
_Multi-family residenual_water use(annual and summer season) _ _ Kent bdhngsystem
_Total non-restdental water use(annual and summer seaso_n) Kent bdlm_gsystem_____ _
_Total Commercial_water use(annual_and summer season) _ _ Kent billing system_________
_Total Industrial water use(annual and summer season)__
Total_Govern_me_nt water use(annual and summer season) __ _ _ _ _Kent billing system__
Water use by individual large customers(customers using at least 100,000 Kent billing system(if applicable)
gallons per day at a single facility,on an average annual basis) (annual and
summer season)—
Total non-revenue water(water that is produced but not included in metered Calculated from production and
sales)(annual and summer season) _ billing records
A breakdown of non-revenue water into "accounted-for'and"unaccounted- Kent estimates
for"categories(n is recognized that these categories will require estimation,
since they arejenerallly not directly measurable) (annual and summer season)
11. Data R_egmredtOnly If Used_m_t_h_e Final Evaluation(should be collected as continency)
Total number of households served Combination of census/PSRC and
Kent billing system(residential
accounts)—- _ _ _
Number of single-family and multi-family households served Combination of census/PSRC and
Kent billing system(residential
accounts)
_Average residential water useper household _ _ _ _ ____ __ _ Calculated from above data _
Average water use per single-family household _ __ _ _ __ _Calculated from above data
Average water use per-multi-family household_ _ _ _ _ Calculated from above data__ __
Total number of non-residential accounts _ __ Kent billing system ___
in the non-residential category,average water use per employee or per capita(if Calculated from above data
per capita,the non-residential water use will be divided by the residential (employment from Census and/or
population)____ _ _ PSRC_)
Changes in the nature of non-residential accounts that have significant effects Kent staff knowledge
on non-residential water u_se _ _ _ _ __ ___ __ _ _
%non-revenue water,ex ressed as a%of totals stem water use Calculated from above data
Section 7-Data Required for Conservation Evaluation of Second Supply Project 7.2
Agreement Implementation-City of Kent s..�03 1v�.mo
June 3,20D3
'Appendix '
Data • Methodologyfor Calculating Water
Usage by Customer Class
The following steps were used to develop information presented in Exhibits 4-4, 4-5, 4-6, 4-7
and 5-1 of this report and in the section entitled "Water Use by Customer Class "
Raw Data
City of Kent provided the Study Team, in March 2003, with a spreadsheet entitled "2000 — 2001
monthly water stars " This spreadsheet contains, on a monthly basis, the volume of water each
customer class was billed for during the years 2000, 2001, and 2002
Data for 2000, which are shown in Table A-1, were used in the report because 2000 is most
representative of a typical year A drought occurred in 2001, and in 2002 the region was
experiencing a recession
The data present the volume of water billed to each customer class The volumes are presented
in ccf, or hundreds of cubic feet In addition to separating out the information by customer class,
the information has been separated according to "inside" or `outside" of Kent's city limits. In
some cases, the customer class name is followed by "sprinkler " Data are presented for customer
classes which are metered separately for domestic and outdoor (lawn irrigation, primarily) water
use.
The second column presents "B," "M," or an empty space in the second column to indicate what
type of accounts were billed for the indicated volume. Accounts which receive bills once every
two months are denoted with a "B," those which receive a monthly bill are included in the rows
denoted with an "M," and those classes without either letter were assumed to be bimonthly.
Data Manipulation
For the purposes of this study, some manipulation of the data was necessary This was necessary
for three reasons.
1 The data included in Table A-1 indicate the volume of water customers were billed for in
each month However, this study is focused on the amount of water customers use in a given
month
2. The Study Team was interested in how much water is used on a monthly basis, which is
provided directly only for the monthly accounts
3 The data are in ccf and need to be converted to millions of gallons (MG) to agree with units
used in remainder of report
Appendix A-Data and Methodology for Calculating Usage by Customer Class A-1
City of Kent Ic,m�2ol-�izq,.a«
June 3,2003
The following assumptions were made .
■ Monthly billed volumes represent the amount of water used dunng '/z of the previous month
and half of the current month, as shown in Exhibit A-1. Essentially, it is assumed that
meters are read on the 15`h of each month To derive the amount of water used in August, '/2
of the August billed volume is added to of the volume billed in September. Meters are
read,in general, on routes during the first three weeks of each month. 1n general, each meter
is read on the same day of each month
Exhibit A-1 Representation of Billing vs. Actual Water Use - Monthly Accounts
AUGUST SEPTEMBER
BILL
WATER USE
■ Bimonthly billed volumes represent the amount of water used during the final half of the
month two months previous to the current month, the entire previous month, and first half of
the current month, as shown in Exhibit A-2 This assumes that each bimonthly account has a
meter reading on the 151h of every other month To derive the amount of water used in July,
'/ of the amount of volume shown for July is added to %2 of the volume billed for August and
'/a of the volume billed for in September
Exhibit A-2 Representation of Billing vs. Actual Water Use - Bimonthly Accounts
JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER
BILL
WATER USE
The following equations can be used:
Monthly Data
0 5(v ) + 0 5(v +i)
Where:
v = volume of water billed for to month n
= given month
01-monthly Data
0 25(v ) + 0 5(vn+i) + 0 25(vn+2)
Where
v = volume of water billed for in month n
x = given month
Appendix A- Data and Methodology for Calculating Usage by Customer Class A-2
City of Kent Kent-01113�
June 3,2003
Sample Calculation
Calculate the amount of water used by Industrial Class during August 2000 using assumptions
discussed above.
Data included in Table A-L
August September October
Industrial (inside city limits) B 0 7641 0
M 33253 34215 31914
Industrial (outside city limits) 0 0 0
Monthly Calculation:
Inside City Limits. 0.5(33253) +0 5(34215) = 33,734
Bi-monthly Calculation:
Inside City Limits 0 25(0) + 0 5(7641) +0 25(0) = 3,820.5
Outside City Limits: 0
• Total Industrial Class Volume for August 2000: 33734 + 3820.5 +0 = 37554.5 ccf
Conversion
The volumes were then converted from ccf to MG using the following conversion
1 cubic foot = 7 4805 gallons
Conversion calculation for August 37554 5 ccf x 100 cf/ccf x 7 4805 gallons/cf x
0 000001 gallons/mil lion gallons
Total Industrial Class Volume for August 2000: 28 093 million gallons
This is the same as the value presented in Table A-2 for the "Industrial Class" in August.
Data Used
The data presented in Table A-2 have been derived as described above and were used to develop
the graphs and discussion in the report
Appendix A-Data and Methodology for Calculating Usage by Customer Class A-3
City of Kent x ntV 03 I124pcdoc
N _o N ' O O O f0 v
Lz r N O N d N
cli
o p r rS r n r r i
N 8 n ipn
m Q N m 00
� J
7
10 qq Y
< b�b O y aaD p N O n O
N N
� O �`1
d 0 N W W N V O W m t0 N d N (OO N O O
0 N V n V cO'1 N V r m m N �0 n r r
m 0 n N O d W m n N m d W N Rol � m f7 W W
N W O � W � V M m n N n N N 0 0 ONI N f�0 Ymf
m r t�01
N W n W N O m W m m m d n W N
n o n t0 N CJ d m n N d N n m m t0 n d
o r N N O Q
O m r h n W oNp t0 N m
O mp 0 t7 fm") n m 0� N tn0
N 01 t�0 n m m 00
I� p
A
V
N N r C) d N d N O r d d W W
MN r d T O N Cl d m �0 ON1 N
y r � 9 r n n O
w
02
d
Q N n a0 V � N O Omi amp m � m N r m
O
W
A
O n N m T O r CJ m n r ��p0 m an d �N W d O p
N ON
r N N d No
N V
D C
Q O
WW pp �
r ►
m n N N O N O W r 0 m 0 m M m 0
{C N N
N m m M N< r YpOl N o N d O m d N
R p m �D n d h O
L
d
o (m� pm mm om � pp �n � v m o m m
y N d r N r tp N C
A
A
M
mom to 2 m2 m1 m mM A
0
m m m < C
o n N x C Y
m t y d T T C C d d
a: (� C7 m '� m m x m m Y Y c m IL
< UMMu
ME E E > j LL = m 8
a E E E a a 9 5 m m D 2' o 0 u
O Om N O O 90 m IQ O O n O N
h
m g 10
Y " N
C 'J
7
7 y
N n ' O O O O O O t0 Ot
HO
n
O m O O m 0 o n O O O N O N
QQ
G N aN`
v O O d O m d O O n o N ry
Z ,v^
o mm a o mo o m o on_ o c
O
y V
O O W O r 0 0 O O m O h N m ion
d m w l`m d N
N [O NV O O 00 m r O O O)O) O d ^b R
m m N O Y
Y
o mn o 0o m N o m oM o a 0
� v
r
m r o 00 do n o o m N o ro b
a
N Y
T
Orn e��ppi
a N U
Y
V
O N N O O CO O N O O O N O N
S' 4)
h 0
0
O
O ow
O O p NO N �O O O 0 - 0 h b G
m N 0 N N N ^ t
ffWLL O N Y
f
9
z r W] O no N N O O m m O n N C
Y
m m N to
Y
^+ h m
O
N 10- 9 Y
YCL
T W c m N 6
N m
v ¢ m m 10 LL r 0 c h c Es
E m g m Y c g
E m m a' > > y m m m 'o onu
0 U C7 U' ma O: J Y Y C7 fJ h U)
N p
N U m W O N S N O tmD W m O N 0 0 a
m n O y
0 0 0 � '
7 Y
m 0 O d NIS
N
N n p r W d m N O yO>
h m W N O n N O S N N m M O N
N
CJ W m N m m ul O N W N m W m �'1
7 m fO m o m m n N m o o m d
m m o �
r O p m N n Odi m � fWD d S O N tD
N O l0 O m O O m m d l7 O m r N � W
V
V
CYI
m ' t N ^ N < m T q E
m o m ri m � .-
V
T
a
ON d y m N N (mO p N 0 Otni T Cl N p N C1
S OI
01
L
W
u
m
O
O
9
t
m «
a
c
A
m
A W
O
V d
9 Y Y Y a C
Cm C C CI
9 p m c N ) N U7 c G•
E' m N N m — m 0 o E
S U U A W LL LL x m C Y Y )
a ¢ E O O Q U
{ yl y _ m 9 j O O m
E E E
8
U U < < 2 U ¢ J U U C7 N N
June 3, 2003
Appendix
Descriptions
Residential Indoor
Low-Flow Showerheads
Description- Distribute low-flow showerheads to reduce shower consumption Accelerates savings
that would occur from plumbing code
Targeted Group Residential accounts with older(pre-1993) showerheads
Faucet Aerators
Description Distribute faucet aerators to reduce flows from faucets in kitchen and bathroom sinks
Targeted Group Residential accounts with older(pre-1993)faucets
Decrease"Run Until Hot" Use
Description Install plumbing system with re-circulating pump or on-demand close proximity water
heater system to provide "instant hot" water to tap in new construction and plumbing remodel
accounts
Targeted Group New construction and plumbing remodel accounts
Leak Detection and Toilet Flapper Repair
Description Install redesigned,longer life toilet flappers in leaking toilets
Targeted Group Residential accounts with toilet flapper leaks
Low-Volume Toilets
Description Install 16 gallon per flush toilets to replace high flush toilets
Targeted Group Residential accounts with 3 5 gallon per flush toilets or higher
Efficient Clothes Washers
Description Install new water efficient clothes washers in households with conventional washers
Targeted Group Households with clothes waters
Efficient Dish Washers
Description Install new water efficient dishwashers in households with conventional washers
Target Group Households with clothes washers
Decreased Faucet Use
Description Reduce minutes of faucet run time
Targeted Group Households
Decreased Shower Use
Description Reduce showering minutes per person
Target Group Households
Eliminate Partial Clothes Washer Loads
Description Reduce the number of clothes washer loads by eliminating partial loads
Target Group Households with clothes washers
Eliminate Partial Dish Loads
Description Reduce the number of dishwasher loads by eliminating partial loads
Target Group Households with dishwashers
Decrease Toilet Flushes
Description Reduce the number of toilet flushes per person
Targeted Group Households
Appendix B-Measure Descriptions B-1
City of Kent K,..V 03 I nk"a
June 3,2003
Residential Outdoor
Irrigation System Improvements
Description Improve the efficiency of existing irrigation systems through repair, removal,
replacement, or adjustment of in-ground sprinkler system components
Targeted Group Residential accounts with manual and automatic irrigation systems
Improved Irrigation Scheduling
Description Improve the efficiency of existing irngation systems through better irrigation
scheduling
Targeted Group Residential accounts with manual and automatic irrigation systems
Soil Moisture Sensors
Description- Install soil moisture sensors for automatic irrigation systems
Targeted Group Residential accounts with automatic in-ground irrigation systems
Efficient Landscaping Practices
Description Replace 300 sq ft of lawn with plants having low water use requirements in new
construction and remodeled landscapes
Targeted Group New construction and remodeled landscapes,
Improved Soil Amendments
Description Improve soil amendments, adding material such as compost, to new construction and
remodeled landscapes
Targeted Group New construction and remodeled landscapes
Automatic Rain Shut Off Devices
Description Install automatic rain shut-off devices for automatic irrigation systems
Targeted Group Residential accounts with automatic in-ground imgation systems
Low-Volume Irrigation Systems
Description Install drip/bubbler irrigation systems for new construction and remodeled landscapes
that would have relied on in-ground sprinkler systems
Targeted Group New construction and remodeled landscapes
Improved Swimming Pool Use
Description Reduce the number of drains and fills of pools by better water quality control
Target Group. Residential accounts with swimming pools
Improved Hot Tub Use
Description Reduce the number of drains and fills of hot tubs through better water quality control
Target Group Residential accounts with hot tubs
Switch to Recirculating Car Wash
Description Reduce the water used for car washing by switching from home to recirculating
commercial washes
Targeted Group Households washing cars at home
Dry Sidewalk Cleaning
Description Reduce sidewalk and drive cleaning with water by switching to sweeping
Target Group Residential accounts using water to clean sidewalks
50-Gallon Rain Barrel Catchment
Description Install 50-gallon irrigation barrels and systems to gutter downspouts to collect
rainwater for irrigation systems
Targeted Group Single-family accounts with irrigated landscaping
1,000 Gallon Cistern Catchment
Description Install 1,000 gallon cisterns to harvest rainwater from single-family home rooftops
Targeted Group New single-family houses,with imgated ornamental landscaping and or gardens
Appendix 8-Measure Descriptions 8-2
City of Kent Kn.Q WA 124p J
June 3, 2003
Improve Maintenance of Turf
Description Improve turf maintenance through actions such as thatching, aerating, over-seeding,
and top-dressing
Targeted Group Residential accounts with irrigated lawn
Improve Mulching
Description Install mulch materials in ornamental gardens
Targeted Group Residential accounts with ornamental gardens
Allow Lawn to go Dormant
Description Reducing irrigation to minimal requirements allowing lawns to go naturally dormant
Targeted Group Residential accounts with irrigated lawns
Non-Residential Indoor
Faucet Aerators
Description Distribute faucet aerators to reduce flows from faucets in kitchen and bathroom sinks
Targeted Group Non-residential accounts with older(pre-1993)faucets
Low-Flow Faucets
Description Distribute low-flow faucets to reduce flows from faucets in kitchens and bathrooms
Accelerates savings that would occur from plumbing code Alternative to faucet aerators
Targeted Group Non-residential accounts with older(pre-1993)faucets
Leak Detection and Toilet Flapper Repair
Description Install redesigned, long life toilet flappers in leaking tank-type toilets
Targeted Group Non-residential accounts with tank-type toilet flapper leaks
Low-Volume Toilets and Urinals
Description Install 16 gallon per flush toilets to replace high flush toilets and 10 gallon per flush
urinals to replace high flush urinals
Targeted Group Non-residential accounts with 3 5 gallon per flush toilets or higher and non-
residential accounts with high flush urinals
Efficient Clothes Washing
Description Replacing small commercial capacity clothes washers with high efficiency machines in
accounts averaging 10 or more loads per day per machine
Target Group Non-residential accounts with small capacity clothes washer use
Efficient Dishwashers
Description Install high efficiency dishwashers in accounts providing restaurant or cafeteria food
services
Targeted Group Non-residential accounts with dishwashing uses
Leak Detection and Repair
Description Reduce leaks for all types of equipment and end-uses in non-residential accounts with
largestleaks
Targeted Group Non-residential accounts with the largest leaks
Improved Kitchen Water Use
Description Decrease water used to rinse,wash, and prepare food items
Targeted Group, Non-residential accounts with food preparation uses
Improved Cooling Systems
Description Improve efficiency of largest accounts' HVAC and equipment cooling towers by
improving water treatment and increasing cooling tower cycles
Targeted Group The largest non-residential accounts with cooling tower uses
Appendix 0-Measure Descriptions 9-3
City of Kent K�.V 03 tizkp,
June 3,2003
Install Waterless Urinals
Description Install waterless urinals to replace high flush urinals
Targeted Group Non-residential accounts with high flush unnals
Stormwater for Toilet and Urinal Flushes
Description Install a stormwater collection and distribution system for toilet and unnal flushing for
large scale new construction
Targeted Group Largest new construction non-residential accounts
Non-Residential Outdoor
Irrigation System Improvements
Description Improve the efficiency of existing irrigation system through repair, removal,
replacement, or adjustment of in-ground sprinkler system components
Targeted Group Non-residential accounts with manual and automatic irrigation systems
Improved Irrigation Scheduling
Description Improve the efficiency of existing irrigation system through better irrigation
scheduling
Targeted Group Non-residential accounts with manual and automatic irrigation systems
Automatic Rain Shut-Oft Devices
Description Install automatic rain shut-off devices for automatic irrigation systems
Targeted Group Non-residential accounts with automatic in-ground irrigation systems.
Weather-Based Irrigation Controls
Description Convert largest accounts with automatic irrigation systems to centrally controlled
system that will adjust schedules based upon current weather conditions and plant requirements
Targeted Group The largest non-residential accounts with automatic in-ground irrigation systems
Low-Volume Irrigation Systems
Description Install drip/bubbler irrigation systems for new construction and remodeled landscapes
that would have relied on in-ground sprinkler systems for 1,000 sq ft of landscaping
Targeted Group Non-residential new construction and remodeled landscapes
Efficient Landscaping Practices
Description Replace 200 sq ft of lawn with plants having low water use requirements in new
construction and remodeled landscapes
Targeted Group Non-residential new construction and remodeled landscapes
Improved Soil Amendments
Description Improve soil amendments, adding material such as compost, to new construction and
remodeled landscapes
Targeted Group. Non-residential new construction and remodeled landscapes
Efficient Sidewalk Cleaning
Description Reduce sidewalk and drive cleaning with water by switching to sweeping one-half the
time
Targeted Group Non-residential accounts using water to clean sidewalks
Efficient Car Washing
Description Reduce hose car washing by changing to portable,high-pressure,low-flow equipment
Targeted Group Largest non-residential accounts with hose car washing
Improve Maintenance of Turf
Description Improve turf maintenance through actions such as thatching, aerating, over-seeding,
and top-dressing
Targeted Group Non-residential accounts with irrigated lawn
Appendix B- Measure Descriptions B-4
City of Kent Krmu-0-1 12rp o
June 3,2003
Eliminate Single-Pass Decorative Water Features
Description Install re-circulating equipment on single-pass decorative water features
Targeted Group Non-residential accounts with single-pass decorative water features
Improve Recycle Water for Vehicle Washes
Description Improved control of recycle water use for vehicle washing in largest accounts already
using recycling for vehicle washing
Targeted Group The largest non-residential accounts with vehicle washing use
•
Appendix B-Measure Descriptions 8.5
City of Kent Xe.U-03 I t2%cpa
Kent City Council Meeting
Date August 5, 2003
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: SELBOURNE LANE FINAL PLAT—APPROVE
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Approve the final plat mylar for the Selbourne Lane
Final Plat(FSU-2002-10), and authorize the Mayor to sign the final plat mylar.
3. EXHIBITS: Memo with conditions and map
4. RECOMMENDED BY: Community Development Dept. Staff
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION.
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 6E
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Fred N Satterstrom, AICP, Director
PLANNING SERVICES
K E N T Charlene Anderson, AICP, Manager
w 5X1MOTON Phone 253-856-5454
Fax 253-856-6454
Address 220 Fourth Avenue S
Kent, WA 98032-5895
DATE: JULY 17, 2003
TO: MAYOR JIM WHITE, COUNCIL PRESIDENT JUDY WOODS AND CITY
COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: CHARLENE ANDERSON, AICP, PLANNING MANAGER
THROUGH: MAYOR JIM WHITE
SUBJECT: SELBOURNE LANE FINAL PLAT (#FSU-2002-10/KIVA 42031527)
MOTION: Approve the City Staff recommendation of approval of the final plat mylar for the
Selboume Lane Final Plat (FSU-2002-10) and authorize the Mayor to sign the final plat mylar
i
SUMMARY: Thomas M Sharp proposes to subdivide approximately 2 37 acres into a
twenty-two (22) lot multifamily townhouse subdivision as a Planned Unit Development
The property is located at 25835 1161h Avenue SE
BUDGET IMPACT: None
BACKGROUND: On March 19, 2003, the Hearing Examiner issued Findings, Conclusion and
Decision granting preliminary approval of a 22-lot multifamily townhouse subdivision as a
Planned Unit Development, with 16 conditions The applicant has complied with the conditions
required prior to recording.
CA S\Permit\Plan\longplats\2002\2031527-2002-10cc DOC
Enclosure Conditions of approval—Hearing Examiner
SELBOURNE LANE
1
//r�
PROJECT LOCATION
SE 256TH 5T
E 257TH ST J t \
Qtry Fly LSE 258 ST
Lo SE 259 PL
c 'p0
PROJECT VICINITY MAP
(NOT TO SCALE)
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
PARCEL #'S A- 292205-9146
B- 292205-9070
ASOAV4l9LL
oV r0 I
-- — 3 . 9q.0N
Far
fN
aS
{ali 4N I<I
al r
_-
1
� 3 Z4,ZS.14 N x+ry ffl_ I'O
„p I
bl a +r1 N Nn j0
V
I..f.—
1 lfl 1 �zA
S7 n 1 I Z<W
"a ¢1 Ip V11iK
Ihl Yd 1 H� ;O{
SSS{ -Y4i 1
1 r 1
Ofl
1 9l � i"rl
In;
1� rH-�
�q0
r
{ mAU U O
ml��� 4;1
a �a9• I w E-4�1
W �
lLLJ
i
L
R w 3
wm O Oi Z w•
w O r
=
Zll e c m H o,o
�� $ eo
O
IJ C e W I 3 p O
m
o
o f ll 6Zl'n� W co
z N
0
— w y p
mo \3�
(n « 0 0
V O N Na U i
Im s�l � y�I .I LJ Oc°
o
v R Lzl, Q z s t
-- -----
----- o Co `o
en _ wg a �
W
sz�—
f �eoo a
_I c m a Z u
W yN i
m _ N E
0
Y w �In nc SZl n c~ o
�n 1 _ j ciao
Im Ndn mjm n nl ja ml �� W ° c
I r .� n ♦R r za wage
1N1 6 0
w,GL 99
,09 S9l '3 ,bf,Sf.00 N
SELBOURNE LANE .
#SU-2002-10
On March 19, 2003, the Kent Hearing Examiner approved Selbourne Lane Preliminary
Plat with the following conditions
A GENERAL CONDITIONS
1 The terms and conditions of Selbourne Lane Townhomes Multifamily
Design Review, MFDR-2001-6, shall apply to this proposal
2. The owner/subdivider shall implement all mitigation measures required by
the Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance (MDNS) for the proposed
Selbourne Lane Townhomes, file ENV-2001-38.
B. PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF FINAL PLAT:
1 The final subdivision plat shall bear a notation that Tract E shall be
retained as permanent common open space and that at no time in the
future shall a townhouse or residential structure be allowed to be
constructed upon said tract
2. The Owner/Subdivider shall pay all Charges in Lieu of Assessments
and/or Latecomer Fees, if any, prior to scheduling the Pre-Construction
Conference and/or prior to recording this plat, whichever comes first
3. The Owner/Subdivider shall submit and receive City approval of
engineering drawings from the Department of Public Works, and shall then
either construct or bond for the following.
a A gravity sanitary sewer system to serve all lots
The public sanitary sewer system shall be extended from the
existing public sanitary sewer system and shall be sized to serve all
off-site properties within the same service area, in addition, the
sanitary sewer system shall be extended across the entire
subdivision as needed to serve adjacent properties within the same
service area, unless otherwise determined by the sanitary sewer
purveyor.
Existing wells, if any, shall be abandoned in accordance with the
requirements of the Department of Ecology
b A water system meeting domestic and fire flow requirements for all
lots. The public water main extension system shall be extended
from the existing public water system and shall be sized to serve all
Page 1 of 6
off-site properties within the same service area; in addition, the
water main extension shall be extended across the entire
subdivision as needed to serve adjacent properties within the same
service area, unless otherwise determined by the water purveyor
c Detailed Drainage Plans meeting the requirements of the City of
Construction Standards, and City of Kent Development Assistance
Brochure #5-3, Detailed Drainage Plans Initial guidance is given in
the conditions that follow:
(1) The Owner/Subdivider shall construct an on-site private
detention/retention pond system in accordance with the Kent
Construction Standards to mitigate for potential impacts to
both stormwater runoff quantity and quality This pond shall
be constructed within a stormwater management tract The
detention/retention pond storage volume and release criteria
shall be that for Soosette Creek; the pre-development
condition shall be assumed to be forest/grass only unless
otherwise determined by the Department of Public Works.
(2) An infiltration pond retention system is the preferred
alternative for mitigation of stormwater impacts and this
alternative shall be required, unless proven unfeasible by the
Owner/Subdivider in the submittal for the Preliminary
Drainage Plan.
(3) As development occurs within this subdivision, roof
downspouts for each roofed structure (house, garage,
carport, etc ) shall be directed to Roof Downspout Infiltration
Trenches, or Perforated Stubouts, meeting the requirements
of the City of Kent Construction Standards, and City of Kent
Development Assistance Brochure #5-5, Roof Downspout
Infiltration Trench Systems, Downspout Dispersion System,
and Perforated Stubout Connections These roof downspout
conveyance and infiltration systems shall include overflow
pipes connected to an approved conveyance system The
Detailed Drainage Plans will include an approved detail for
the Roof Downspout Infiltration Trench, or Perforated
Stubout, and will provide for private stormwater stubouts to
each lot for future connection from the Roof Downspout
Infiltration Trenches, or Perforated Stubouts The face of the
recorded plat shall contain the following restriction
AS A CONDITION OF BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE,
RESIDENCES CONSTRUCTED ON LOTS OF THIS
SUBDIVISION MUST PROVIDE ROOF DOWNSPOUT
INFILTRATION TRENCH (PERFORATED STUBOUT)
Page 2 of 6
SYSTEMS PER DETAILS SHOWN ON THE APPROVED
STORMWATER PLANS.
(4) A downstream analysis is required for this development, and
it will include an analysis for capacity, erosion potential, and
water quality from the point of discharge from the site
downstream a distance of at least one quarter mile or to the
point where stormwater discharges to the maintained portion
of the City of Kent stormwater drainage system, whichever
distance is further. See City of Kent Development Assistance
Brochure #5-4, Downstream Analyses, for the specific
information required for downstream analyses.
(5) The Owner/Subdivider shall submit Landscape Plans for
within and surrounding the retention/detention facility to
Planning Services and to the Department of Public Works for
concurrent review and approval prior to, or in conjunction
with, the approval of the Detailed Drainage Plans These
Landscape Plans shall meet the minimum requirements of
the City of Kent Construction Standards, and the stormwater
management landscaping requirements contained within
City of Kent Development Assistance Brochure #5,
Landscape Plans Landscape Plans are not to be used to
show required Street Trees
(6) The Owner/Subdivider shall execute Declaration of
Stormwater Facility Maintenance Covenants for the private
portions of the drainage system prepared by the Property
Management Section of the Department of Public Works.
See City of Kent Development Assistance Brochure #5-17,
Declaration of Stormwater Facility Maintenance Covenants,
for information on what is contained within this document
d An open-to-the-air private stormwater treatment system in
accordance with the requirements of the Kent Construction
Standards, and published City of Kent Development Assistance
Brochures dealing with stormwater treatment, to mitigate for
potential impacts to stormwater runoff quality. Acceptable
stormwater treatment facilities meeting this requirement in their
preferred order include infiltration after pretreatment, biofdtration
swales, wet ponds, extended detention ponds, and created
wetlands. See City of Kent Development Assistance Brochures
#5-1, through #5-15, for additional information on stormwater
treatment requirements
(1) The stormwater treatment system shall be within the
approved private stormwater management tract
Page 3 of 6
(2) Easements for biofiltration swales across private lots will not
be acceptable to meet this requirement.
e. A Detailed Grading Plan for the entire subdivision meeting the
requirements of the Uniform Budding Code, the City of Kent
Construction Standards, and City of Kent Development Assistance
Brochure #1-3, Excavation and Grading Permits & Grading Plans
Initial guidance for these plans is given below,
(1) These plans will include provisions for utilities, roadways,
retention/detention ponds, stormwater treatment facilities,
and a building footpad for each lot
(2) These plans shall be designed to eliminate the need for
processing several individual Grading Permits upon
application for Building Permits
f A Temporary Erosion/Sedimentation Control Plan for the entire
subdivision meeting the requirements of the City of Kent
Construction Standards, and the most recent adopted version of
the Stormwater Management Manual for the Puget Sound Basin
These plans must reflect the Detailed Grading Plan discussed
above, and the Planning Services approved Detailed Tree Plan.
g Street Improvement Plans for the new Private Residential Street
connected to 1161" Avenue South Street and terminating with an
approved turnaround at its west terminus. The Street Improvement
Plans for this street shall be designed in conformance to the
requirements for a Private Residential Street as required by City of
Kent Construction Standards, and City of Kent Development
Assistance Brochure #6-2, Private and Public Street Improvements
and City of Kent Development Assistance Brochure # 6-8, Street
Improvement Plans for a street at least 20-feet wide Initial
guidance for these street improvements is given below
(1) A minimum of 20-feet of asphalt concrete pavement
(2) A 5-foot wide cement concrete sidewalk or paved walkway
constructed along the north side of the street.
(3) A turnaround at its west terminus, approved jointly by the
City Fire Marshal and Public Works, and a Commercial
Concrete Driveway Approach meeting the requirements of
Standard Detail 6-5(b) at the east end of this street
Page 4 of 6
(4) A private stormwater drainage system, including provisions
for conveyance, detention, and treatment facilities where
applicable.
(5) Unless additional asphalt concrete pavement width is
provided for parking, all minimum width private streets
serving more than two lots shall have pavement markings
and traffic signs installed which clearly designate these
private streets as Fire Lanes, where no parking will be
permitted
(6) Streetlights are not required, but are recommended for this
private street Should the Owner/Subdivider install a street
lighting system for this private street, then the home owners
will be solely responsible for all costs associated with the
design, installation, and those expenses necessary to keep
that private street lighting system operating.
(7) The private street, including sidewalk(s) shall be centered
within a private roadway tract or easement that is at least
four feet wider than the total width of the private street and
sidewalk combination
4. The face of the final plat shall clearly identify the private street and shall
also specify that the maintenance of this private street is the sole
responsibility of the property owners who are served by this private street
5. Direct vehicular access to and from Lot 1 and Tract E onto 116rh Avenue
Southeast is prohibited, and the face of the final plat will carry the
following restriction:
DIRECT VEHICULAR ACCESS TO AND FROM LOT 1 AND FROM
TRACT E ONTO 116T" AVENUE SOUTHEAST IS PROHIBITED.
VEHICULAR ACCESS FOR ALL LOTS AND TRACTS CONTAINED
WITHIN THIS SUBDIVISION IS RESTRICTED TO THE PRIVATE
STREET SHOWN ON THE FACE OF THIS PLAT
6. The Owner/Subdivider shall deed all public rights-of-way, and otherwise
convey all private and public easements necessary for the construction
and maintenance of the required improvements for this subdivision
development Unless otherwise determined by Public Works after receipt
of a topographic and boundary map prepared, stamped, signed and dated
by a licensed land surveyor, the following minimum right-of-way will be
dedicated by the Owner/Subdivider for this subdivision:
Page 5 of 6
A strip of land at least 45-feet in width, as measured from the City-
10 approved design centerline of the right-of-way for 116`"Avenue South to
the new west margin of said public street.
7 The Owner/Subdivider shall submit and receive approval of a Detailed
Tree Plan, meeting the requirements of the Kent Zoning Code, and City of
Kent Development Assistance Brochure #3, Detailed Tree Plans, prior to
the Issuance of any Construction Permits for the subdivision Grading
Plans cannot be approved by the Department of Public Works without an
approved Detailed Tree Plan.
8 After construction, the stream and buffer areas shall be isolated from
intrusion and/or disturbance using landscaping, or other appropriate
screens, as well as an approved permanent wildlife-passable fence In
addition, stream/sensitive area information signs approved by the
Department of Public Works shall be placed at the stream buffer edge to
inform and educate owners and nearby residents about the value of
sensitive areas
9. Prior to release of any construction bonds, and prior to the approval of any
Building Permits within the subject subdivision, the Department of Public
Works must receive and approve As-Built Drawings meeting the
requirements of the City of Kent Construction Standards, and City of Kent
Development Assistance Brochure #E-1, As-Build Drawings, for Streets,
Street Lighting System, Water, Sewer, Stormwater Drainage Facilities,
and all off-site improvements where the locations and/or elevations are
deemed critical by the Department of Public Works
C PRIOR TO, OR IN CONJUNCTION WITH, THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING
PERMIT ON ANY LOT IN THIS SUBDIVISION, THE OWNER/SUBDIVIDER
SHALL-
1 Record the Plat
2 Pay the environmental mitigation fee for that lot
3 Receive approval of the required As-Built Drawings for Street, Street
Lighting, Water, Sewer, and Stormwater Management Facilities.
4 Construct all of the improvements required above
5. Pay the Kent School District School Impact Fee for that lot.
S Term API anvongpiats120 0212 03 1 52 74su-2002-10conditions doc
Page 6 of 6
Kent City Council Meeting
Date August 5, 2003
Category Consent Calendar
I. SUBJECT: KING COUNTY COUNTYWIDE PLANNING POLICIES
AMENDMENTS RATIFICATION RESOLUTION—ADOPT
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Adoption of Resolution No. that ratifies
proposed amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies per King County
Ordinances 2003-0123, -0124,-0125 and -0126, and that disapproves the proposed
amendment per King County Ordinance 2003-0127.
3. EXHIBITS: Staff memo; resolution; King County letter of 5/30/03 with attached
ordinance; and staff material
4. RECOMMENDED BY: Planning Committee 7/15/03 (3-0)
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
6. EXPENDITURE REOUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION.
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 6F
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Fred N Satterstrom, AICP, Director
PLANNING SERVICES
K EN T Charlene Anderson,AICP, Manager
Phone 253-856-5454
Fax 253-656-6454
Address 220 Fourth Avenue S
Kent, WA 98032-5895
DATE: JULY 29, 2003
TO: MAYOR JIM WHITE, COUNCIL PRESIDENT JUDY WOODS, AND CITY
COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: CHARLENE ANDERSON, AICP, PLANNING MANAGER
THROUGH: MAYOR JIM WHITE
SUBJECT: COUNTYWIDE PLANNING POLICIES - AMENDMENTS
KING COUNTY COUNCIL ORDINANCES
MOTION: Passage of Resolution No that ratifies proposed amendments to
the Countywide Planning Policies per King County Ordinances 2003-0123, -0124, -0125
and -0126, and that disapproves the proposed amendment per King County Ordinance
2003-0127
SUMMARY: At their July 15th meeting, the Planning Committee unanimously recommended
ratification of six amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies ("CPPs") approved by the
Growth Management Planning Council ("GMPC") under Motions 02-1 through 02-6, and
recommended disapproval of GMPC Motion 01-2 that addresses the long-tern governance of the
Agricultural Production District and removes the distnct from the Urban Growth Boundary and
Kent's Potential Annexation Area The adoption of countywide planning policies is required
under the State Growth Management Act (GMA), pursuant to RCW 36 70A.210. The CPPs
provide a framework for Kent and other cities in King County to conduct planning under the
requirements of GMA This framework ensures that city and county comprehensive plans are
consistent On May 19th, the King County Council approved and ratified seven amendments
that had been approved by the GMPC and now these amendments are presented to Jurisdictions
in King County for ratification
BUDGET IMPACT: None
BACKGROUND: The City of Kent ratified the original CPPs on September 15, 1992, with
Resolution No 1326 and ratified Phase II amendments to the CPPs on November 16, 1994 Over
the years, the City has ratified other proposed amendments Through the GMPC, Jurisdictions
within King County work together to plan for economic and population growth in King County,
including consideration of CPPs
The CPPs become effective when ratified by ordinance or resolution of at least 30 percent of the
city and county governments representing 70 percent of the population of King County
according to the established Interlocal Agreement A city will be deemed to have ratified the
8/5/03 City Council
Countywide Planning Policies—Amendments
Growth Management Planning Council Motions
Staff Report
Page 2
amendments to the CPPs unless the city takes legislative action to disapprove the amendments
within 90 days of adoption by King County
Six 2002 GMPC motions and one 2000 GMPC motion to amend the CPPs were voted out of
county council committee on March 18, 2003 and subsequently were approved and ratified by
the full County Council on May 19`h The 90-day deadline for legislative action on these
proposed amendments is August 19, 2003
Motion No. 01-2 (K.C. Ordinance 2003-0127/14656) Adds new policies that address the long-
term governance of Agricultural Production Districts Removes the Lower Green River
Agricultural Production District from the Urban Growth Boundary and states these lands shall
not be annexed by cities
Motion No. 02-1 (K.C. Ordinance 2003-0124/14653) Revises existing policies and adds new
policies to support extension of the household and employment targets for 2001-2022
Motion No. 02-2 (K.C. Ordinance 2003-0124/14653) Adds targets for new households for
2001-2022
Motion No. 02-3 (K.C. Ordinance 2003-0124/14653) Adds targets for new jobs for 2001-
2022.
Motion No. 02-4 (K.C. Ordinance 2003-0123/14652) Adds a policy to support ongoing water
supply planning and development
Motion No. 02-5 (K.C. Ordinance 2003-0125/14654). Reflects the negotiated modification of
the Renton Urban Separators
Motion No. 02-6 (K.C. Ordinance 2003-0126/14655) Adds Totem Lake to the list of Urban
Centers
CA\pm S\Permn\Plan\CompPlanAmdments\2003\cppcc doc
Eric Resolution, May 30,2003 letter from King County Council including Ordinances 14652 through 14656
cc Fred N Satterstrom,AICP,C D Director
Charlene Anderson, Planning Manager
Project File
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION of the City Council of Kent,
Washington, regarding King County Countywide Planning
Policies adopted by the Metropolitan King County Council
pursuant to the Growth Management Act
WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 36 70A 210, the Growth Management Act
requires the adoption of Countywide Planning Policies to provide a countywide framework
from which local comprehensive plans are to be developed, and
WHEREAS,King County,the City of Seattle,and the incorporated suburban
cities and towns in King County established a process for the development, adoption, and
ratification of Countywide Planning Policies by an mterlocal agreement, which established
the Growth Management Planning Council(GMPC),a group consisting of elected officials
from King County,suburban cities, and the City of Seattle, who were authorized to develop
a set of recommended countywide planning policies for consideration by the King County
Council, and
WHEREAS, the GMPC met on the dates specified below and voted to pass
additional amendments to accomplish the following
1 On September 25, 2002, adopting an amendment to the Countywide
Planning Policies adding a new policy to support ongoing water
supply planning and development (GMPC Motion 02-4),
1
Countywide Planning
Policy Amendments-2003
2 On July 24,2002,adopting amendments to the Countywide Planning
Policies adopting new household and employment targets for the
period 2001 through 2022 (GMPC Motion 02-1, 02-2, and 02-03),
3 On October 23, 2002, adopting amendments to the Countywide
Planning Policies amending the Urban Separator map to reflect
negotiated modifications to the Renton Urban Separator (GMPC
Motion 02-5),
4 On October 23, 2002, adopting amendments to the Countywide
Planning Policies designating Totem Lake as an Urban Center
(GMPC Motion 02-6), and
5 September 26, 2001, adopting amendments to the Countywide
Planning Policies removing the Agricultural Production Districts
from the City of Kent's Potential Annexation Area (GMPC Motion
01-2)
WHEREAS, the King County Council approved and ratified these
amendments on behalf of King County on May 19, 2003, pursuant to King County
Ordinances 2003-0123 (GMPC Motion 02-4),Ordinance 2003-0124(GMPC Motions 02-1, .
02-2,and 02-3),Ordinance 2003-0125 (GMPC Motion 02-5),Ordinance 2003-0126(GMPC
Motion 02-6), and Ordinance 2003-0127 (GMPC Motion 01-2), and
WHEREAS,the Kent Planning Committee reviewed these amendments at its
meeting on July 15, 2003, NOW THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON,DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The City of Kent, acting pursuant to the Interlocal Agreement
among King County,the City of Seattle,and incorporated suburban cities,hereby ratifies the
following proposed amendments to the Countywide Planning Polices as adopted by the
Metropolitan King County Council King County Ordinances 2003-0123,2003-0124,2003-
0125, and 2003-0126
2
Countywide Planning
Policy Amendments-2003
SECTION2. The City of Kent hereby disapproves of the following proposed
amendment to the Countywide Planning Policies as adopted by the Metropolitan King
County Council Ordinance 2003-0127
SECTIONS. The amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies adopted
herein shall be filed with the City Clerk and in the Planning Services office and made
available for public inspection.
Passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Kent,Washington this
day of 2003
Concurred in by the Mayor of the City of Kent, this day of
, 2003
JIM WHITE, MAYOR
ATTEST-
BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM
TOM BRUBAKER, CITY ATTORNEY
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of Resolution No passed
by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, the day of
, 2003
(SEAL)
BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK
3
Countywide Planning
Policy Amendments-2003
JUN to 2003
King County
May 30, 2003
The Honorable Jim White
Mayor, City of Kent
220 -4th Avenue South
Kent, WA 98032
Dear Mayor White
We are pleased to forward for your consideration and ratification the enclosed amendments to
the King County Countywide Planning Policies (CPPs).
On May 19, 2003, the King County Council approved and also ratified seven amendments on
behalf of unincorporated King County Please note that the amendments approved by the
Growth Management Planning Council for the growth targets, and the household and lob
target tables, were combined into one ordinance, 2003-0124 Copies of King County Council
Staff Reports, County Ordinances, and Growth Management Planning Council Motions are
enclosed to assist you in your review of these amendments
• Ordinance 2003-0123 (GMPC Motion 02-4) adopting amendments to the Countywide
Planning Policies, adding a new policy to support ongoing water supply planning and
development, ratifying the amended Countywide Planning Policies on behalf of the
population of unincorporated King County
• Ordinance 2003-0124 (GMPC Motions 02-1, 02-2 and 02-3) adopting amendments to the
Countywide Planning Policies, adopting new household and employment targets for the
period 2001 through 2022; ratifying the amended Countywide Planning Policies on behalf
of the population of unincorporated King County
• Ordinance 2003-0125 (GMPC Motion 02-5) adopting amendments to the Countywide
Planning Policies, amending the Urban Separator map to reflect negotiated modifications
to the Renton Urban Separator, ratifying the amended Countywide Planning Policies on
behalf of the population of unincorporated King County
• Ordinance 2003-0126 (GMPC Motion 02-6) adopting amendments to the Countywide
Planning Policies, designating Totem Lake as an Urban Center, ratifying the amended
Countywide Planning Policies on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County
• Ordinance 2003-0127 (GMPC Motion 01-2)adopts amendments to the Countywide
Planning Policies addressing the long-term protection of Agricultural Production Districts,
and ratifies the amended Countywide Planning Policies on behalf of the population of
unincorporated King County
The Honorable Jim White
May 30, 2003
Page 2
In accordance with the Countywide Planning Policies, FW-1 Step 9, amendments become
effective when ratified by ordinance or resolution by at least 30 percent of the city and county
governments representing 70 percent of the population of King County according to the
Interlocal agreement. A city will be deemed to have ratified the amendments to the
Countywide Planning Policies unless, within 90 days of adoption by King County, the city
takes legislative action to disapprove the amendments. Please note that the 90-day deadline
for these proposed amendments is August 19, 2003 If you have questions about the
amendments or the ratification process,please contact Paul Reitenbach, Senior Policy
Analyst, King County Department of Development and Environmental Services, at
206-296-6705 or Lauren Smith, Legislative Analyst, King County Council, at 206-296-0352
If you adopt any legislation relative to this action, please submit by close of business,
August 19, 2003, one copy of the legislation to Paul Reitenbach, Senior Policy Analyst,
King County Department of Development and Environmental Science, 900 Oakesdale
Avenue Southwest, Renton, WA 98055-1219.
Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter
Sincerely,
Cynthia Sullivan, Chair ims
King County Council King County Executive
Enclosures
cc: Lauren Smith, Legislative Analyst, King County Council
Stephanie Warden, Director, Department of Development and Environmental
Services (DDES)
Paul Reitenbach, Senior Policy Analyst, DDES
ICING COUNTY 1200 Kmg couary CouMaue
' 516 k,W 9810 A
Sapk,WA 48101
Signature Report
May 19, 2003
Ordinance14652
Proposed No. 2003-0123.1 Sponsors Hague
I AN ORDINANCE adopting amendments to the
2 Countywide Planning Policies;adding a new policy to
3 support ongoing water supply planning and development;
4 ratifying the amended Countywide Planning Policies for
5 unincorporated King County; and amending Ordinance
6 10450, Section 3,as amended, and K.C.0 20.10,030 and
7 Ordinance 10450, Section 4, as amended, and KC C.
8 20.10.040.
9
10
I 1 BE IT ORDAINED BY T13E COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY:
12 SECTION 1. Findings. The council makes the following findings.
13 A. The metropolitan King County council adopted and ratified the Growth
14 Management Planning Council recommended King County 2012-Countywide Planning
15 Policies (Phase I)in July 1992, under Ordinance 10450.
1
Ordinance 14652
16 B The metropolitan King County council adopted and ratified the Phase II
17 amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies on August 15, 1994,under Ordinance
18 11446.
19 C. The Growth Management Planning Council met on September 25, 2002 and
20 voted to recommend amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning
21 Policies, adding a new policy to support ongoing water supply planning and
22 development.
23 SECTION 2. Ordinance 10450, Section 3, as amended,and K.C.0 20.10.030 are
24 each hereby amended to read as follows:
25 Phase II.
j 26 A. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide Planning
27 Policies attached to Ordinance 11446 are hereby approved and adopted.
28 B. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning
29 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12027.
30 C. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning
31 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12421.
32 D. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning
33 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment I and 2 to Ordinance 13260.
34 E. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning
35 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 through 4 to Ordinance 13415.
36 F The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning
37 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments I through 3 to Ordinance 13858.
2
Ordinance14652
I
38 G The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012—Countywide Planning
39 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14390.
40 H. The Phase 11 Amendments to the King County 2012—Countywide Planning
41 Pohcies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14391.
42 I The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012—Countywide Planning
43 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14392.
44 J The Phase 11 Amendments to the King County 2012—Countywide Planning
45 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to this ordinance
46 SECTION 3. Ordinance 10450,Section 4, as amended, and K C.C.20.10 040 are
i
47 each hereby amended to read as follows:
48 Ratification for unincorporated King County.
49 A. Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 10450 for the purposes
50 specified are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County
51 B The amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance
52 10840 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated Kmg County.
53 C. The amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance
54 11061 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County
55 D. The Phase 11 amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide Planning
56 Policies adopted by Ordinance 11446 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of
57 unincorporated King County.
58 E The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies,as
59 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12027 are hereby ratified on behalf of the
60 population of unincorporated King County.
•
3
Ordinance 14652
61 F. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies,as
62 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12421, are hereby ratified on behalf of the
63 population of unincorporated King County.
64 G. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies,as
65 shown by Attachments 1 and 2 to Ordinance 13260, are hereby ratified on behalf of the
66 population of unincorporated King County.
i
67 H. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies,as
I
68 shown by Attachment 1 through 4 to Ordinance 13415, are hereby ratified on behalf of
69 the population of unincorporated King County.
70 1. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies,as
71 shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 13858,are hereby ratified on behalf of
72 the population of unincorporated King County.
73 ] The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies, as
74 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14390, are hereby ratified on behalf of the
75 population of unincorporated King County.
76 K. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies,as
77 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14391, are hereby ratified on behalf of the
78 population of unincorporated King County.
79 L. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies,as
80 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14392, are hereby ratified on behalf of the
81 population of unincorporated King County.
4
Ordinance 14652
I
82 M" The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planrune Policies,as
83 shown by Attachment 1 to this ordinance,are hereby ratified on behalf of the population
84 of unincorporated King County.
85
Ordinance 14652 was introduced on 3/17/2003 and passed by the Metropolitan King
County Council on 5119/2003,by the following vote:
Yes: 12 - Ms. Sullivan,Ms Edmonds,Mr.von Reichbauer,Ms.Lambert,Mr.
Phillips,Mr. Pelz,Mr. McKenna,Mr.Constantine, Mr. Gossett, Ms. Hague,
Mr.Irons and Ms. Patterson
No: 0
Excused:0
KING COUNTY COUNCIL
KING COUNTY,WASIIIPIGTON
ynthia Sullivan,Chair o
ATTEST: r
O t�
Anne Noris,Clerk of the Council
T. z)
iV
r
APPROVED this,�Q.day of_171 ,2003.
on ounty Exec ve
j V
Attachments Attachment 1.GMPC Motion 02A
5
Attachment 1 - 2003-0123
I
14652
September 25,2002
Sponsored By: Executive Committee
/cm
l MOTION NO. 024
2 A MOTION by the Growth Management Planning Council of Kmg
3 County recommending the amendment of the Countywide Planning
4 Policies adding a new policy to support ongoing water supply
5 planning and development.
6
7 WHEREAS,in July 2002, the Growth Management Planning Council approved additions
8 and changes to the 1994 Countywide Planning Policies approving the countywide process
9 developed to recommend a new 22-year household and employment target; and
10
11 WHEREAS, an amendment to add a new policy supporting ongoing water supply planning
12 and development was considered and tabled; and
13
14 WHEREAS,the GMPC allowed reconsideration of the amendment at such time agreement
15 could be reached on the language; and
16
17 WHEREAS,it 1s in the interest of the county to encourage regional efforts to plan for and
18 develop sufficient water supply sources to accommodate population growth and to meet
19 environmental needs related to conservation of fish habitat.
20
21 THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLANNING COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY
22 HEREBY MOVES AS FOLLOWS:
23
24 Add a new policy to Section III C of the King County Countywide Planning Policies as
25 follows:
26 FW-12c Ensuring sufficient water supply is essential to accommodate growth and
27 conserve fish habitat Due to the substantial lead-time required to develop water supply
28 sources infrastructure and management strategies, long-term water supply planning efforts
29 in the Region must be ongoing.
30
3]
32
33
I
14652
1
2 ADOPTED by the Growth Management Planning Council of King County on
3 September 25, 2002 in open session.
4
5
6
7
a
9
10 Ron Sims,Chair,Growth Management Planning Council
I/GMPMGMPGM0t024 dM - 2 _
o 0
Metropolitan King County Council
Growth Management and Unincorporated Areas Committee
Staff Report
Agenda Item: 6 Name: Lauren Smith
Proposed Ordinance: 2003-0123 Date: March 18, 2003
Attending: Paul Reitenbach, King County DDES
Kevin Wright, King County PAO
SUBJECT:
Proposed Ordinance 2003-0123 adopting amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies;
adding a new policy to support ongoing water supply planning and development; ratifying the
amended Countywide Planning Policies on behalf of the population of unincorporated King
County.
BACKGROUND:
The Growth Management Planning Council (GMPC) is a formal body comprised of elected
officials from King County, Seattle, Bellevue, the Suburban Cities, and Special Districts The
GMPC was created in 1990 in response to a provision in the Washington State Growth
Management Act (GMA) requiring cities and counties to work together to adopt Countywide
Planning Policies (CPPs). Under GMA, countywide planning policies serve as the framework
for each individual jurisdiction's comprehensive plan, and ensure regional consistency with
respect to land use planning efforts. The GMPC drafted the CPPs, which were then adopted by
the King County Council and ratified by the cities Changes to the CPPs are recommended by
the GMPC, adopted by the King County Council, and ratified by the cities
GMPC Actions
On September 25, 2002 the GMPC adopted Motion 02A recommending the adoption of a new
policy (FW12c) related to water supply planning and development. The issue of regional water
supply was raised during discussions related to the adoption of new household and
employment targets for the region, and was offered in the spirit of ensuring ongoing
infrastructure planning efforts The proposed new policy is consistent with existing policy
direction in the CPPs related to water supply planning (Policy CO-5).
FW-12c Ensuring sufficient water supply is essential to accommodate growth and
conserve fish habitat. Due to the substantial lead-time required to develop water
supply sources, infrastructure and management strategies, long-term water
supply planning efforts in the Region must be ongoing
SUMMARY:
Proposed Ordinance 2003-0123 would amend the Countywide Planning Policies by.
♦ Adding a new policy, FW-12c in support of an ongoing discussion related to long-term
water supply planning
CIWINDDWS\TEMP1200391231CPP AmerM nt -Water Supply PlamaVK3-1"31 docW1=03850 AM
Additionally, the ordinance would ratify this change on behalf of the population of
unincorporated King County, as required by Countywide Planning Policy FW-1, Step 9
Amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies become effective when ratified by ordinance
or resolution by at least 30% of the city and county governments representing 70% of the
population of King County according to the Interlocal agreement A city shall be deemed to
have ratified the countywide planning policy unless, within 90 days of adoption by King County,
the city by legislative action disapproves the Countywide Planning Policy
POLICY DIRECTION
Countywide Planning Policies
CO-5 Water supply shall be regionally coordinated to provide a reliable economic source of
water and to provide mutual aid to and between all agecnies and purveyors THe region
should work toward a mechanism to address the long-tens regional water demand
needs of all agencies and water purveyors.
ATTACHMENTS:
1 Proposed Ordinance 2003-0123, with attachments
C1WINDOWWEMP0003-0123(CPP Amendments-Www Supply Planninp)(3.1043)dac 521/1003 0 50 AM
KING COUNTY 1200 King County Courthouse
516 71urd Avenuc
Swale,WA 98104
Signature Report
May 19, 2003
Ordinance14653
Proposed No. 2003-0124 1 Sponsors Hague
I AN ORDINANCE adopting amendments to the
2 Countywide Planning Policies;adopting new household
3 and employment targets for the period 2001 through 2022;
4 revising existing policies and adding new policies in
5 support of the new targets;ratifying the amended
6 Countywide Planning Policies for unincorporated King
7 County; and amending Ordinance 10450, Section 3, as
8 amended,and KC C. 20 10 030 and Ordinance 10450,
9 Section 4, as amended, and K.0 C. 20.10 040
10
11
12 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY.
13 SECTION 1. Findings. The council makes the following findings
14 A. The metropolitan King County council adopted and ratified the Growth
15 Management Planning Council recommended King County 2012-Countywide Planning
16 Policies (Phase I)in July 1992,under Ordinance 10450.
1
Ordinance 146M
17 B. The metropolitan King County council adopted and ratified the Phase II
18 amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies on August 15, 1994, under Ordinance
19 11446.
20 C The Growth Management Planning Council met on July 24, 2002 and voted to
21 recommend amendments to the King County 2012- Countywide Planning Policies,
22 revising existing policies and adding new policies to support extending household and
23 employment targets for the period 2001 through 2022.
24 D. The Growth Management Planning Council met on September 25,2002 and
25 voted to recommend amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning
26 Policies,adopting new household and employment targets for the period 2001-2022
27 SECTION 2. Ordinance 10450, Section 3,as amended, and K.0 C. 20 10 030 are
28 each hereby amended to read as follows:
29 Phase II.
30 A The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide Planning
31 Policies attached to Ordinance 11446 are hereby approved and adopted
32 B The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning
33 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12027
34 C. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning
35 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12421. .
36 D. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning
37 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 and 2 to Ordinance 13260.
38 E. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning
39 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 through 4 to Ordinance 13415.
2
Ordinance 14653
40 F. The Phase 11 Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning
41 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 13858.
42 G. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012—Countywide Planning
43 Policies are amended,as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14390.
44 N. The Phase 11 Amendments to the King County 2012—Countywide Planning
45 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14391.
46 I. The Phase H Amendments to the King County 2012—Countywide Planning
47 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment i to Ordinance 14392.
48 1 The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012—Countywide Planning
49 Policies are amended,as shown by Attachments 1 throuph 3 to this ordinance.
50 SECTION 3. Ordinance 10450,Section 4, as amended, and KC.C. 20 10 040 are
51 each hereby amended to read as follows:
52 Ratification for unincorporated King County.
53 A. Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 10450 for the purposes
54 specified are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County.
55 B. The amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance
56 10840 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County.
57 C The amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance
58 11061 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated Jiving County.
59 D. The Phase 11 amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide Planning
60 Policies adopted by Ordinance 11446 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of
61 unincorporated King County.
3
Ordinance 14653
62 E. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies,as
63 shown by Attachment I to Ordinance 12027 are hereby ratified on behalf of the
64 population of unincorporated King County.
i
65 F. The amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning Policies, as
i
66 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12421, are hereby ratified on behalf of the
67 population of unincorporated King County.
68 G. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies,as
69 shown by Attachments l and 2 to Ordinance 13260, are hereby ratified on behalf of the
j 70 population of unincorporated King County.
I
71 H. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies,as
72 shown by Attachment 1 through 4 to Ordinance 13415, are hereby ratified on behalf of
73 the population of unincorporated King County
74 I. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies, as
75 shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 13858,are hereby ratified on behalf of
76 the population of unincorporated King County
77 J. The amendments to the King County 2012- Countywide Planning Policies,as
78 shown by Attachment I to Ordinance 14390,are hereby ratified on behalf of the
79 population of unincorporated King County.
80 K The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies,as
81 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14391, are hereby ratified on behalf of the
82 population of unincorporated King County,
•
4
Ordinance 14653
83 L. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies, as
84 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14392,are hereby ratified on behalf of the
85 population of unincorporated King County.
86 M. The amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning Policies as
87 shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to this ordinance, are hereby ratified on behalf of the
88 population of unincorporated King County.
89
Ordinance 14653 was introduced on 3/17/2003 and passed by the Metropolitan King
County Council on 5/19/2003,by the following vote:
Yes: 12-Ms. Sullivan, Ms.Edmonds,Mr. von Reichbauer,Ms.Lambert,Mr.
Phillips,Mr. Pelz,Mr.McKenna,Mr Constantine,Mr.Gossett,Ms.Hague,
Mr. Irons and Ms.Patterson
No: 0
Excused:0 .
KING COUNTY COUNCIL
KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON
O
Cp
ynthia Sullivan,Chair c '�
ATTEST. r ci
r i
�^ N
Anne Noris,Clerk of the Council
APPROVED this day of 1" gM 2003.
Ron S s,C unty Executive U
Attachments 1 GMPC Motion 02-1,2 GMPC Motion 02-2,3.GMPC Motion 02-3 .
5
14653
Household F1H Capacity PAA HH Job Capacity PAA Job
Subareas Target in FAA* Target Job Target in PAA Target
South Xm u
Alignem
Aubm 5,928 2 6
Ed
1
BMW 1
2
8B 754 1 2Kent q 7 6Ncwinastdy Mark
pacific 127 en
45
64 14
M
7 5
County Rl
q 4.935BOONII 6
827 B
Kirkland 5,480 770 74
hRmul 1
Mercer blind 1,437
Nmpostle 863 ] 1
RCdMODd 9,083 402 390D
wootluivillt
Umccirp King CDUnty 11,7
•04222 ••4099
T
lAke Forest Pad
sbmhne
Unm Km Coun '•• 1670 1670
T 7
Rural cuaRnm va0
NQfID od
s1kylotnisib
S 1,647
TOW 5,563
Kim om Total 151,932
•PM Pdcuoa7Amezauoo Aen mUmn<mPmamdlGog Coovry UiWn Arta,••Bear Gcel UPD•••NatL}LgbLK
The Amal 66ea targets ere for the cmrene ury bmds and rural czpawoa a a for cacb ury 7bos ibe methodology
for sdrysbng targets m amc.h m ec<aa a mot aVpbmbk to de oval oom
2
kJGMPC102GMPCfMod12-2 doe - 3 -
14653
Houscbold HH Capamty FAA HH lob Cspactty PAA Job
Sutnrent Targd is PAAa Target JobTmgd is PAA• Target
fA Ktn au
Aubu 6 2
Black Purnond
m
Do Moms 1,695
deml Way 4 4
Kept 11.500
44 44
t
a Vail 804
N
R=tDn7 4 4
4
Tukwila 497 497
UMCOM Yung County 701 701
Taw 2 2.582
East KRr Cough
iBasta Arts Villaw
40
2 4
Clyde u
Hunts
1 u 14,0010
KoUnd 8 221
Medzn
Island R
Re
a
WpAnvdk
Ummacarp King CountY 4637 a'4193 "4193
TOW 98927 4A37 4.637
LAM F'ollm Past 453
UMCDrp KwR Cow *** 694 1 44
Total 694
Nara Cides
cmumboll m 7
Essusuclaw
North d
Skvkomisb
Sooqualme 1
TMA
aPAA Pounual Auseaan=A sa w Umoewpaawd Kmg County Urban M ,"Her C-a UPD;•a•Nonh Jbgbbw
7be Rural Gtwa'tsrgeu art for the asmot oty busts and wd eapavaoo arcs fw each ury 7bm the me0udulogy
fw adlmbng targeu as awemboas ocwr u not appbcable to The anal auee.
1
LGMP"2GMPCJMotW-3 doc - 3
Attachment 1
2003-0124
14653
July 24,2002
Sponsored By Executive Committee
/cm
1 MOTION NO. 02-1
2 A MOTION by the Growth Management Planning Council of King
3 County recommending the amendment of the Countywide Planning
4 Policies revising existing policies and adding new policies to support
5 the extension of the household and employment targets for the period
6 2001-2022.
7
8 WHEREAS, in accordance with the Growth Management Act(GMA),the 1994
9 Countywide Planning Policies established a household and employment target range for
10 each city and for King County through 2012; and
11
12 WHEREAS, the 1994 targets need to be extended to reflect protected growth through 2022
13 in accordance with the GMA (RCW 36 70A 110); and
14
15 WHEREAS,Countywide Planning Policy FW-3 states that the adopted household and
16 employment targets shall be monitored by King County annually with adjustments made
17 by the Growth Management Planning Council utilizing the process established in FW-1,
18 Step 6,and
19
20 WHEREAS since February 2001 staff from King County and the cities in King County
21 have worked cooperatively to analyze and recommend new 20-year household and
22 employment targets: and
23
24 WHEREAS the Growth Management Planning Council met and discussed the extension of
25 the household and employment targets for the period 2001-2022,with opportunity for
26 public comment on March 28, 2001,July 25,2001, October 24,2001 and May 22, 2002
27 THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLANNING COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY
28 HEREBY MOVES AS FOLLOWS:
29
30 Amend Sections III. C and III. F of the King County Countywide Planning Pohcies as
31 follows:
32
33 III. Land Use Pattern
34
35 C. Urban Areas
36
14653
1 The following policies establish an Urban Growth Area(UGA), determine the amount ot
2 household and employment growth to be accommodated within the UGA in the form f
3 targets for each iurisdiction, and identi methods to phase development within this area in
4 order to bring certainty to long-tern planning and development within the County. All
5 cities are included in the UGA, with the cities in the Rural Area identified as islands of
6 urban growth. The(Urban GrLA&4h Ama) UGA is a permanent designation. Land outside
7 the( ) UGA is designated for permanent rural and resource uses.((,
8 emepifeF the cWff in Me RuralAr. )) Countywide Policies on Rural and Resource Areas
9 are found in Chapter IIIA, Resource Lands, and Chapter IIIB, Rural Areas
10
11 In accordance with the State Growth Management Act(GMA)(36 70A 110). the State
12 Office of Financial Management(OFM)provides a population protection to each county.
13 The county, through a collaborative intergovernmental process established by the Growth
14 Management Planning Council, allocates the population as growth targets to individual
15 jurisdictions Forecasts prepared by the Puget Sound Regional Council are used to
16 establish the employment proiection.
17
18 The process for allocating targets in King County is asfollows:
19
20 1. The PSRC employment forecasts are calculated for the four geographic subareas of
21 the UGA (Sea-Shore, South. East, and Rural Cities). These then become subarea
22 employment targets.
23 2. The iurisdictions collectively allocate the OFM population proiection to the four
24 subarea's based on the proiected employment for each area. A small amount of
25 growth is assumed to occur in the Rural area.
26 3. The technical sta8'translates the population proiections into protected households.
27 taking into account different average household sizes within each subarea. These
28 proiections then become subarea household targets.
29 4. Jurisdictions within each subarea negotiate the distribution of subarea household
30 and employment targets using criteria based on Countywide Planning Policies
31
32 The housing capacity in the (( )) UGA ((lea grewth)), based on adopted
33 plans and regulations, ((meer&4he))should accommodate the proiected 20-year
34 growth((
35 pepulstien'reeasts)). (( ))Growth is to be accommodated within
36 permanent Urban Areas by increasing densities, as needed. Phasing((is-ie))should occur
37 within the(( )) UGA, as necessary, to ensure that services are provided
38 as growth occurs. ((AU ...,:__are e be iy;a.:_ Me Urban Gre)s4 fi e_ a Gifi iot the a.._..r
39 Area are te be Urban GmiwhAfea ))
40 FWA 1 The land use pattern for King County shall protect the natural
41 environment by reducing the consumption of land and concentrating
42 development. An Urban Growth Area, Rural Areas, and resource lands
43 shall be designated and the necessary implementing regulations
44 adopted. This includes Countywide establishment of a boundary for the
45 Urban Growth Area. Local jurisdictions shall make land use decisions
46 based on the Countywide Planning Policies.
47
IJGN2cm2GMPCIMoro2•t dm - 2 -
14653
1 F1N-12 The Urban Growth Area shall provide enough land to accommodate
2 future urban development. Policies to phase the provision of urban
3 services and to ensure efficient use of the growth capacity within the
4 Urban Growth Area shall be instituted.
5
6 FW-12a All jurisdictions within King County share the responsibility to
7 accommodate the 20-year population projection. The growth projection
s shall be assigned to the four subareas of King County (Sea-Shore. East,
9 South, and the Rural Cities) proportionate with the share of projected
10 employment growth. The growth shall be allocated pursuant to the
11 following obiectives:
12 a. To ensure efficient use of land within the UGA by directing growth to
13 Urban Centers and Activity Centers:
14 b. To limit development in the Rural Areas:
15 c. To protect designated resource lands:
16 d. To ensure efficient use of infrastructure;
17 e. To improve the iobs/housing balance on a subarea basis:
18 f. To promote a land use pattern that can be served by public
19 transportation and other alternatives to the single occupancy vehicle:
20 and
21 g. To provide sufficient opportunities for growth within the jurisdictions.
22
23 FW-12b The growth targets established pursuant to the methodology described in
24 LU-25c and 25d shall be supported by both regional and local
25 transportation investments. The availability of an adequate
26 transportation system is critically important to accommodating growth
27 The regional responsibility shall be met by planning for and delivering
28 county, state, and federal investments that support the growth targets
29 and the land use pattern of the County. This includes investments in
30 transit, state highways in key regional transportation corridors, and in
31 improved access to the designated Urban Centers. The local
32 responsibility shall be met by local transportation system investments
33 that support the achievement of the targets.
34
35 LU —25a Each jurisdiction shall plan for and accommodate the household and
36 employment targets established pursuant to LU-25c and LU-25d. This
37 obligation includes:
38 a. Ensuring adequate zoning capacity: and
39 b. Planning for and delivering water, sewer, transportation and other
40 infrastructure, in concert with federal and state investments and
41 recognizing where applicable special purpose districts: and
42 c. Accommodating increases in household and employment targets as
43 annexations occur.
44
45 The targets will be used to plan for and to accommodate growth within
46 each jurisdiction. The targets do not obligate a jurisdiction to guarantee
47 that a given number of housing units will be built or bobs added during the
48 planning period.
I/GMPCM2GMPCJMu1D2a am - 3 -
14653
1 LU25b As annexations occur, growth targets shall be adjusted. Household and
2 employment targets for each jurisdiction's potential annexation area as
3 adopted in Table LU-1 shall be transferred to the annexing jurisdiction
4 follows:
5
6 a King County and the respective city will determine new household
7 and employment targets for areas under consideration for
8 annexation prior to the submittal of the annexation proposal to the
9 King County Boundary Review Board-
10 b A citv's household and employment targets shall be increased by a
11 share of the target for the potential annexation area proportionate to
12 the share of the potential annexation area's development capacity
13 located within the area annexed. Each city will determine how and
14 where within their corporate boundaries to accommodate the target
15 increases;
16 c The County's target shall be correspondingly decreased to ensure
17 that overall target levels in the county remain the same:
1 s d. The household and employment targets in Table LU-1 will be
19 updated periodically to reflect changes due to annexations. These
20 target updates do not require adoption by the Growth Management
21 Planning Council.
22
23 LU - ((67)) 25cThe target ((s-andiegulatkws)) objectives identified in (( ))
24 FW-12a ((are based en)) shall be realized through the following ((steps))
25 methodology for allocating household targets:
26 a• ((
27
28 )) Determine the additional
29 emulation that must be accommodated countywide by calculating the
30 difference between the most recent Census count and the State
31 Office of Financial Management population projection for the end of
32 the twenty Year planning period;
33 b.
34
35 • �))
36 Subtract a percentage from that number to represent the amount of
37 growth that is assumed to occur in the unincorporated Rural Area:
38 ((
39
40
41
42 el, 6apaGity of undeveloped land and potential f9FfedGv9kq)ff*PA
43 given !he GhRFRPAAF Of existing development,
44 S. The need faF a Fange Gf housing typesi
45
47with t '))
ucrPCA2GMWM0102-i.am - 4 -
14653
1 c. Assign proportions of the urban population growth to each of the four
2 subareas (Sea-Shore, South. East, and Rural Cities) based on the
3 proportion of future employment growth_forecasted for each of those
4 subareas by the Puget Sound Regional Council:
5 d. Convert the estimated oroiected population for each subarea to an
6 estimated number of households, using oroiected average
7 household sizes that reflect the variation among those subareas
8 observed in the most recent Census:
9 e. Allocate a household target to individual iurisdictions, within each
10 subarea, based on FW-12a and considering the following factors:
11 1. the availability of water and the capacity of the sewer system:
12 2. the remaining portions of previously adopted household targets:
13 3. the presence of urban centers and activity areas within each
14 iurisdiction:
15 4. the availability of zoned development capacity in each iurisdiction:
16 and
17 5. the apparent market trends for housing in the area.
18 ((
19
20 ;))
21 (( .
22 be no-nsktAM y4th the target Fanges in Appendix 2 OF shall state
23 ))
24 ((e. ThFough the p J undeF PN 1 StOp 4b, 9 the
25
26
27
28 plans:))
29 f._ Jurisdictions shall plan for household targets as adopted in Table
30 LU-1: and
31 ((f))g. Monitoring should follow the process described in policy FW-
32 1.
33
34 A portion of the urban employment growth will occur in Activity Areas and neighborhoods
35 in the Urban Area. This employment growth will support the Urban Centers, while
36 balancing local employment opportunities in the Urban Area.
37
38
39 LU - ((68)) 25d ((T-aFget Fanges iQF employment gFeYAh outside Urban Centers
40
41
42 steps)) The target obiectives identified in FWA2a shall be realized
43 through the following methodology for allocating employment targets:
44
45 a. ((
46
47
IJGMP002GMK MO102-1 dm - 5 -
14653
1
2
3
4 ;
5
6 i ;
7
8 SapaGlty,
9 4. Avaulabilities of undeveloped land and potential fGF Fedevelopm
10 given the GharaGteF of existing development;
I
12
13
14
15 Fes*dentmal areas)) Determine the number of lobs that must be
16 accommodated in each of the four subareas of King County (Sea-
17 Shore South, East, and the Rural Cities) in accordance with the most
18 recent PSRC hob estimates and forecasts for the 20-year planning
19 period. To account for uncertainty in the employment forecasts.
20 establish a range of new hobs that must be accommodated in each
21 subarea. Unless exceptional circumstances dictate, the range should
22 be 5%on either side of the PSRC forecast.
23 b.
24
zs pursuant to poliGy PN 4, Step 4)) For each subarea, determine the
26 point within the range upon which Wrisdictions within the subarea will
27 base their targets and allocate employment growth targets to
28 individual iurisdictions based on consideration of the following:
29 1. the PSRC small area forecasts:
30 2. the presence of urban centers. man ufactu ringlindustrial
31 centers, and activity areas within each iurisdiiction:
32 3. the availability of zoned commercial and industrial
33 development capacity in each jurisdiction and;
34 4. the access to transit, as well as to existing highways and
35 arterials.
36
37
38 20 yeaFs inside and outside Urban Centers and shall shn-l-A-0 h--Q-1.0;thA*r
39 plans ref!eGt the oFiteFia in !his peligy4)
40
41
42
43 •))
44 c. Junsdictions shall plan for employment targets as adopted in Table
45 L -1.
46 (INSERT TABLELU-1)
UGMPCA2GMFC1MW02-1 dx - 6 -
14653
1 F. 1. Urban Residential Areas
2 Urban residential areas form the bulk of the UGA, and are home to a large portion of the
3 County's population. They will contain a mix of uses and will have different
4 characteristics indifferent neighborhoods. Generally, the character,form,preservation
5 and development of these areas((is-a))are the responsibility of the local jurisdiction((al
6 resp�y)). However, the residential areas need to support the Centers concept and
i 7 provide sufficient opportunity for growth within the UGA. A substantial majority of new
8 residential units will be constructed within urban residential areas.
9
10
11 LU-66 In order to ensure efficient use of the land within the UGA, provide for
12 housing opportunities, and to support efficient use of infrastructure, each
13 jurisdiction shall:
14
15 a. Establish 1n its comprehensive plan a target minimum number of net
16 new households the jurisdiction will accommodate in the next 20
17 years in accordance with the adopted household growth targets
18 identified 1n Table LU-1. Jurisdictions shall adopt regulations to and
19 commit to fund infrastructure sufficient to achieve the target number;
20 b. Establish a minimum density (not including critical areas)for new
21 construction in each residential zone; and
22 c. Establish in the comprehensive plan a target mix of housing types for
23 new development and adopt regulations to achieve the target mix.
24
25 l=U 67 The laicgeis and Feqwlatien6 iR 6U 66 are based on the iollowiRg rAeps--.
26 a. The GF9VAh MaAageFsent Planning CouriGil adopted the large
27 numbeF Of net Row heuseholds to be aGGOFAFnedated Gountywide as
28 195,,8DG;
29
30
37 nPim., households foF eaGh junsdietien based on the 1911OWing GOtienar
32
33 fAndetmAS and 640ftiesi
34 2. PFoximity to majGF transit Ggntefsy,
35 ;
36
37 ;
38 ;
34 r.. EaGh jurisdi(Aien's share of affeFdable housing as required by
40 affeFdable housing peliG esi
41 7 CORAWAR ovide numbersi
42
43
44 ;
45 'A jun--OGWA'S GOFAPFehenseve plan shall be
46
47
IIGMPM2GMPCJMotW-1 dw — 7 —
14653
1 ADOPTED by the Growth Management Planning Council of King County on July 24,
2 2002 in open session.
3
4
5
6
7 Ron Sims, Chair,Growth Management Planning Council
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
I
UGMP002GMPC/Ma02-i doc - 9 -
Attachment 2
2003-0124
14653
July 24,2002
Sponsored By: ExecutiyeComm)tiee
/cm
I MOTION NO. 02-2
2 A MOTION by the Growth Management Planning Council of Icing
3 County recommending the amendment of the Countywide Planning
4 Policies adding targets for new household for the period 2001-2022
5 by deleting Appendix 2,2A and 2B and amending Table LU-1: 2001-
E 2022 Household and Employment Growth Targets which will be
7 located in Section III. C of the Countywide Planning Policies.
8
9 WHEREAS,the 1994 Countywide Planning Policies established a housing target range for
10 each city and for King County; and
11
12 WHEREAS,the Growth Management Act requires the 1994 targets need to be revised to
13 establish an extension of the targets through 2022; and
14
15 WHEREAS the Growth Management Planning Council met and discussed the extension of
16 the household and employment targets for the period 2001-2022, with opportunity for
17 public comment on March 28,2001,July 25, 2001, October 24,2001 and May 22,2002.
18 THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLANNING COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY
19 HEREBY MOVES AS FOLLOWS:
20
21 The attached Table LU-1. 2001-2022 Household and Employment Growth Targets
22 is hereby recommended for adoption in the Countywide Planning Policies to revise
23 the household growth targets to reflect the target extension from January 1, 2001
24 through December 31,2022 and Appendix 2, 2A,2B are recommended for
25 deletion.
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34 0 35
36
14653
1
2
3 ADOPTED by the Growth Management Planning Council of King County on
4 September 25,2002 in open session.
5
6
7
8
9
10
11 Ron Sims,Chair, Growth Management Planning Council
12 Attachment:
13 1. Table LU-1: 2001-2022 Household and Employment Growth Targets.
I
i/GMPC/02GMPGMot02-2.da - 2 -
Attachment 3
2003-0124
14653
July 24,2002
Sponsored By: Executive Committee
km
1 MOTION NO. 02-3
2 A MOTION by the Growth Management Planning Council of King
3 County recommending the amendment of the Countywide Planning
4 Policies adding targets for new Jobs for the period 2001-2022 by
5 amending Table LU-1: 2001-2022 Household and Employment
6 Growth Targets which will be located in Section III. C of the
7 Countywide Planning Policies.
i g
9 WHEREAS,the 1994 Countywide Planning Policies established an employment target
10 range for each city and for King County; and
11
12 WHEREAS,the ]994 targets need to be revised to establish an extension of the targets
13 through 2022 as required by the Growth Management Act.
14
15 WHEREAS the Growth Management Planning Council met and discussed the extension of
16 the household and employment targets for the period 2001-2022,with opportunity for
17 public comment on March 28, 2001,July 25, 2001,October 24,2001 and May 22, 2002.
1s THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLANNING COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY
19 HEREBY MOVES AS FOLLOWS:
20
21 The attached Table LU-1:20D]-2022 Household and Employment Growth Targets
22 is hereby recommended for adoption in the Countywide Planning Policies to revise
23 the employment growth targets to reflect the target extension from January 1,2001
24 through December 31,2022.
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
14653
1
2
3 ADOPTED by the Growth Management Planning Council of Mug County on
4 September 25,2002 in open session.
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
(;Qz—'�-
12 Ron Sims, Chair,Growth Management Planning Council
13
14 Attachment:
15 1. Table LU-1:2001-2022 Household and Employment Growth Targets.
UGMP0026MPCJM0102-3 dw — 2 —
® 0
Metropolitan King County Council
Growth Management and Unincorporated Areas Committee
Staff Report
Agenda Item: 7 Name: Lauren Smith
Proposed Ordinance: 2003-0124 Date: March 18, 2003
Attending: Paul Reitenbach, King County DDES
Kevin Wright, King County PAO
SUBJECT:
Proposed Ordinance 2003-0124 adopting amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies,
adopting new household and employment targets for the period 2001 through 2022; ratifying
the amended Countywide Planning Policies on behalf of the population of unincorporated King
County.
BACKGROUND:
The Growth Management Planning Council (GMPC) is a formal body comprised of elected
officials from King County, Seattle, Bellevue, the Suburban Cities, and Special Districts The
GMPC was created in 1990 in response to a provision in the Washington State Growth
Management Act (GMA) requiring cities and counties to work together to adopt Countywide
Planning Policies (CPPs) Under GMA, countywide planning policies serve as the framework
for each individual jurisdiction's comprehensive plan, and ensure regional consistency with
respect to land use planning efforts. The GMPC drafted the CPPs, which were then adopted by
the King County Council and ratified by the cities Changes to the CPPs are recommended by
the GMPC, adopted by the King County Council, and ratified by the cities
GMPC Development of Household & Employment Targets
In February 2002, the Washington State Office of Financial Management released new
population forecasts for the 20-year period 2002-2022 (the projections were smaller than
expected, largely due to the current economic climate) The GMA requires King County and the
cities within King County to plan to accommodate these updated projections. The GMPC is
responsible for developing updated household and employment targets for each jurisdiction in
King County.
The GMPC's intequrisdictional staff team worked with a subcommittee of the King County
Planning Directors to extend the existing targets through 2022, with the GMPC's approval of
their methodology. In recent years, the region has grappled with the concept of a jobs/housing
"balance"as part of ongoing growth management discussions The development of the updated
targets was approached with the jobs/housing balance in mind
The methodology approved by the GMPC took a sub-regional approach. First, the County's
urban area was divided into four subareas: "SeaShore" (comprised of Seattle, Shoreline, and
DIW)NDOWSITEMP�2003-0120(CPPAm ndwnb-HmsehM Enooy"ni Targe X3-1"3)d WW= 85DAM
Lake Forest Park), East King County, South King County and the Rural Cities'. Next, a
percentage of the total population forecast for King County was assigned to each subarea that
was based on the percentage of expected job growth for each subarea (employment forecasts
were provided by the Puget Sound Regional Council). Finally, the raw population numbers
were converted into households (based on the average household size in each subarea), and
the jurisdictions within each subarea negotiated their household targets The draft household
and employment targets were presented to the GMPC On May 22, 2002 at which time the
GMPC directed staff to prepare motions recommending their adoption Policy changes related
to the new targets were adopted on July 24, 2002 and the targets themselves were adopted on
September 25, 2002
Development of the household targets was informed by the results of the Buildable Lands work
(required by GMA), which has been developed over the past 5 years (the Buildable Lands
Report was released in August, 2002) Major findings from this work include:
♦ 96% of all new development in King County is occurring within Urban Growth Areas
• 40% of the way through the 1992-2012 planning period, King County has reached 38%
of the household growth target, and more than 50% of the population forecast
♦ King County has the capacity for 263,000 more housing units This is more than twice
the capacity needed to accommodate the remainder of the 1992-2012 household growth
targets
♦ King County has the capacity for nearly 600,000 more jobs within the Urban Growth
Area — several times the remaining target of 110,000 jobs for the period 1992-2012
• ♦ All available evidence suggests that there is enough capacity to support the new targets
through 2022
SUMMARY:
Proposed Ordinance 2003-0127 would amend the Countywide Planning Policies by
♦ Adopting revised household targets for each jurisdiction in King County for the period
2001-2022,
♦ Adopting revised employment targets for each jurisdiction in King County for the period
2001-2022, and
♦ Amending the policy direction in the Countywide Planning Policies in support of the new
household and employment targets
Additionally, the ordinance would ratify these changes on behalf of the population of
unincorporated King County, as required by Countywide Planning Policy FW-1, Step 9
Amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies become effective when ratified by ordinance
or resolution by at least 30% of the city and county governments representing 70% of the
population of King County according to the Interlocal agreement A city shall be deemed to
have ratified the countywide planning policy unless, within 90 days of adoption by King County,
the city by legislative action disapproves the Countywide Planning Policy.
ATTACHMENTS:
f Although the Carnation, Duvall, Enumclaw,North Bend and Snoqualmie are called Rural Cities, the Growth
Management Act considers all municipalities to be Urban Rural cities provide the vast majority of services and
infrastructure for residents of the Rural unincorporated area,and they do have growth targets,albeit small ones
when compared to cities in the main urban growth area
C WANDOWSTEW2003-0124(CPP Amendments HouwWd Employment TargetsN3"1a-03)dw Wir"3 a 50 AM
1, Proposed Ordinance 2003-0124 with attachments
C"'")OWS%EMP12003*124 fCPP A,"'M H-u- * CnVl0y"M TBrg,,X3.,,.),.541g003 8 50 AM
KING COUNTY 1200 Ying Cwaty CuurtSouu
516 Thrd Avmm
. ScaWe,WA 98104
Signature Report
May 19, 2003
Ordinance 14654
Proposed No. 2003-0125 1 Sponsors Hague
I AN ORDINANCE adopting amendments to the
2 Countywide Planning Policies;amending the Urban
3 Separator map to reflect negotiated modifications to the
4 Renton Urban Separator, ratifying the amended
5 Countywide Planning Policies for unincorporated King
6 County; and amending Ordinance 10450,Section 3, as
7 amended, and K.0 C_20.10 030 and Ordinance 10450,
8 Section 4,as amended,and K.0 C. 20.10 040
9
10
11 BE rr ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY:
12 SECTION 1. Findings. The council makes the following findings.
13 A. The metropolitan King County council adopted and ratified the Growth
14 Management Planning Council recommended King County 2012-Countywide Planning
15 Policies(Phase 1)in July 1992,under Ordinance 10450.
1
Ordinance 14654
16 B. The metropolitan King County council adopted and ratified the Phase II •
17 amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies on August 15, 1994,under Ordinance
18 11446.
19 C. The Growth Management Planning Council met on October 23, 2002 and
I
20 voted to recommend amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning
21 Policies, amending the Urban Separator map to reflect negotiated modifications to the
22 Renton Urban Separator.
23 SECTION 2. Ordinance 10450,Section 3,as amended,and K C.C.20.10 030 are
i
24 each hereby amended to read as follows:
25 Phase II.
i
26 A. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide Planning
i
27 Policies attached to Ordinance 11446 are hereby approved and adopted.
28 B. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning
29 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12027.
30 C. The Phase H Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning
31 Policies are amended,as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12421.
32 D The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning
33 Policies are amended,as shown by Attachment 1 and 2 to Ordinance 13260.
34 E The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning
35 Policies are amended,as shown by Attachment I through 4 to Ordinance 13415.
36 F. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning
37 Policies are amended,as shown by Attachments I through 3 to Ordinance 13858.
2
Ordinance 14654
38 G. The Phase 11 Amendments to the King County 2012—Countywide Planning
39 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14390.
40 H The Phase 11 Amendments to the King County 2012—Countywide Planning
41 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14391.
42 I. The Phase 11 Amendments to the King County 2012—Countywide Planning
43 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14392.
44 J. The Phase D Amendments to the King County 2012—Countywide Plamung
45 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment I to this ordinance.
46 SECTION 3. Ordinance 10450, Section 4,as amended,and K.0 C 20.10 040 are
47 each hereby amended to read as follows.
48 Ratification for unincorporated King County.
49 A. Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 10450 for the purposes
50 specified are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County.
51 B. The amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance
52 10840 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County.
53 C The amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance
54 11061 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County.
55 D The Phase 11 amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide Planning
56 Policies adopted by Ordinance 11446 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of
57 unincorporated King County.
58 E The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies,as
59 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12027 are hereby ratified on behalf of the
60 population of unincorporated King County.
3
Ordinance 14654
61 F. The amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning Policies,as •
62 shown by Attachment I to Ordinance 12421, are hereby ratified on behalf of the
63 population of unincorporated King County.
64 G. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as
65 shown by Attachments 1 and 2 to Ordinance 13260, are hereby ratified on behalf of the
66 population of unincorporated King County.
67 H. The amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning Policies, as
68 shown by Attachment 1 through 4 to Ordinance 13415, are hereby ratified on behalf of
69 the population of unincorporated King County.
70 1 The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies,as
71 shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 13858, are hereby ratified on behalf of
72 the population of unincorporated King County.
73 1. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies,as
74 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14390,are hereby ratified on behalf of the
i
75 population of unincorporated King County.
76 K. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies,as
77 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14391,are hereby ratified on behalf of the
78 population of unincorporated King County.
79 L. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies,as
80 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14392,are hereby ratified on behalf of the
81 population of unincorporated King County.
4
Ordinance 14654
82 M. The amendments to the King County 2012- Countywide Planning Policies, as
83 shown by Attachment i to this ordinance, are hereby ratified on behalf of the population
84 of unincorporated King County.
85
Ordinance 14654 was introduced on 3/17/2003 and passed by the Metropolitan King
County Council on 5/19/2003, by the following vote-
Yes: 12 -Ms. Sullivan,Ms.Edmonds,Mr. von Reichbauer,Ms.Lambert,Mr.
Phillips,Mr.Pelz,Mr.McKenna,Mr Constantine,Mr. Gossett,Ms.Hague,
Mr Irons and Ms.Patterson
No: 0
Excused: 0
KING COUNTY COUNCR.
KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON
Cynthia Sullivan,Chair
ATTEST o
- CD
' r0 l i
� j�1
Anne Nons,Clerk of the Council
c
N
APPROVED this Wlo�day of�,2003
Ron S ounty Executive
Attachments I GMPC Motion 02-5
5
Attachment 1
2003-0125
14654
October 23, 2002
Sponsored By: Executive Comrmttee
1 MOTION NO. 02-5
2 A MOTION to amend the Urban Separator Map in the
3 Countywide Planning Policies to reflect the negotiated
4 modifications of the Renton Urban Separator
5
6 WHEREAS, The Growth Management Act states that each Urban Growth Area shall
7 permit urban densities and shall include greenbelt and open space areas;
8
9 WHEREAS, Urban Separators are an adopted regional strategy serving multiple functions
10 and providing environmental, visual, recreational and wildlife benefits to the citizens and
11 communities of King County,
12
13 WHEREAS, Consistent with the Countywide Planning Policies, the Kmg County
14 Comprehensive Plan recognizes that Urban Separators create open space corridors,provide
15 a visual contrast to continuous development, and reinforce the unique identities of
16 communities;
17
18 WHEREAS, King County has designated Urban Separators on the Land Use 2000 map in
19 the King County Comprehensive Plan, and King County has provided advance copies of
20 Urban Separator maps to cities that have designated Urban Separators located within their
21 Potential Annexation Areas;
22
23 WHEREAS,the City of Renton disagreed with Urban Separator.designation for 76 acres of
24 land within its Potential Annexation Area; and
25
I 26 WHEREAS, the Growth Management Planning Council directed staff to attempt to
27 negotiate a mutually acceptable resolution of this disagreement
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
14654
1
2
3 THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLANNING COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY
4 HEREBY MOVES AS FOLLOWS:
5
6 The Urban Separators map included within the Countywide Planning Policies document is
7 amended to reflect the negotiated modifications of the Renton Urban Separator described
8 and mapped in the September 25,2002 GMPC staff report. Specifically,76 acres of
9 unincorporated land is deleted from Urban Separator designation and 118 8 acres within
10 the City of Renton shall be designated Urban Separator.
11
12 ADOPTED by the Growth Management Planning Council of King County on
13 October 23,2002 in open session.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22 Ron Sims, Chair, Growth Management Planning Council
1/GMPC2002GMP0Mouw02-5&x
0 0
Metropolitan King County Council
Growth Management and Unincorporated Areas Committee
Staff Report
Agenda Item: 8 Name: Lauren Smith
Proposed Ordinance: 2003-0125 Date: March 18, 2003
Attending: Paul Reitenbach, King County DDES
Kevin Wright, King County PAO
SUBJECT:
Proposed Ordinance 2003-0125 adopting amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies,
amending the Urban Separator map to reflect negotiated modifications to the Renton Urban
Separator, ratifying the amended Countywide Planning Policies on behalf of the population of
unincorporated King County.
BACKGROUND:
The Growth Management Planning Council (GMPC) is a formal body comprised of elected
officials from King County, Seattle, Bellevue, the Suburban Cities, and Special Districts. The
GMPC was created in 1990 in response to a provision in the Washington State Growth
Management Act (GMA) requiring cities and counties to work together to adopt Countywide
Planning Policies (CPPs) Under GMA, countywide planning policies serve as the framework
for each individual jurisdiction's comprehensive plan, and ensure regional consistency with
respect to land use planning efforts. The GMPC drafted the CPPs, which were then adopted by
the King County Council and ratified by the cities. Changes to the CPPs are recommended by
the GMPC, adopted by the King County Council, and ratified by the cities
Countywide Planning Policies: Policy Direction related to Urban Separators
Urban Separators are regionally significant tow-density areas within the Urban Growth Area that
create open space corridors, provide a visual contrast to continuous development and reinforce
the unique identities of communities. Urban Separators can play a significant role in preserving
environmentally sensitive areas and providing fish and wildlife habitat. They also provide
regional benefits, such as parks and trails, and meet the Growth Management Act's
requirement for greenbelts and open space within the Urban Growth Area. Urban Separators
are governed by Countywide Planning Policy LU-27•
LU-27 Urban Separators are low-density areas or areas of little development within the Urban
Growth Area. Urban Separators shall be defined as permanent low-density lands which
protect adjacent resource lands, Rural Areas, and environmentally sensitive areas and
create open space corridors within and between Urban Areas which provide
environmental, visual, recreational and wildlife benefits Designated urban separators
shall not be redesignated in the future (in the 20-year planning cycle) to other urban
uses or higher densities. The maintenance of these urban separators is a regional as
C IWINDOWSITEMP2003-0125(CPP Amendments-Renton Urban Sepaata)(34"3)doc 9212W3 0 50 AM
well as local concern. Therefore, no modifications should be made to the development
regulations governing these areas without King County review and concurrence
Urban Separators are within the Urban Growth Area and therefore are appropriate to be
annexed by cities Once annexed, Urban Separators (and all other annexed land) are shown
as "incorporated areas" on the County's comprehensive land use map
The lack of a map of Urban Separators in the countywide planning document was seen by the
staff as problematic because it increased the likelihood that cities might be unaware of the
presence of Urban Separators within their Potential Annexation Areas Therefore, the
mtequnsdictional staff team recommended that the GMPC adopt a map of existing Urban
Separators.
Three cities have designated Urban Separators within their Potential Annexation Areas Auburn,
Kent, and Renton.
Past GMPC Actions related to Urban Separators
July 25, 2001 GMPC staff recommends including a map of existing urban separators in
the Countywide Planning Policies Member jurisdictions of the GMPC
express concern over the boundaries of designated Urban Separators
and ask the intequrisdictional staff team to present additional information
at the September meeting
September 26, 2001 GMPC directs staff to meet with affected cities (Kent, Renton and
Auburn)to answer questions and clarify the boundaries of the designated
Urban Separators
October 5, 2001 King County staff meets with Kent, Renton and Auburn to answer
questions and clarify the boundaries of the designated Urban Separators
November 20, 2001 The intequnsdictional staff team reports to the GMPC Executive
Committee that staff has successfully negotiated a solution to concerns
about mapping Urban Separators raised by Renton and Auburn The
Executive Committee directs staff to develop a motion for the GMPC's
consideration at the December meeting
December 11, 2001 GMPC adopts Motion 01-1, adopting maps of uncontested Urban
Separators and setting in place a process to further analyze and refine
the Urban Separators in Renton and Auburn's Potential Annexation
Areas, to be completed no later than September 30, 2002
September 25, 2002 The intequnsdictional staff team reported back to the GMPC with the
following information on the City of Renton and Auburn's Urban
Separators
City of Renton
Renton did not agree with the Urban Separator designation for 76 acres of unincorporated
urban land within their Potential Annexation Area (PAA), citing lack of environmental
C%WINWWS%TEMP20 1251CPP Amendments-Remora UN n d. W112003 850 AM
constraints However, Renton did identify 119 acres within their city limits that they felt met the
criteria for designation of Urban Separators. The City proposed removing the Urban Separator
designation from the 76 acres within their PAA, and applying the designation to the 119 acres
within their city boundaries, for a net gain of 43 acres. The intepunsdictional staff team field-
checked the two areas and concurred with the city's conclusions
City of Auburn
Auburn did not agree with the Urban Separator designation for 178 acres of land within their
PAA, but has identified 153 acres they do feel meets the criteria. The City of Kent recently
annexed a large piece of property adjacent to Auburn's existing Urban Separator that the
interjurisdictional staff team believes contains environmentally constrained areas and that would
make a natural extension of the existing Urban Separator. However, the City of Kent does not
wish to consider designating this area until sometime in 2003 Therefore, the inte0unsdictional
staff team recommends that discussions should continue with Auburn and Kent, and that staff
should report back to the GMPC with recommendations by June 1, 2003.
October 23, 2002 The GMPC adopted Motion 02-5, amending the Countywide Planning
Policies to reflect the negotiated modifications to the Renton Urban
Separator
SUMMARY:
Proposed Ordinance 2003-0125 would amend the Countywide Planning Policies by
♦ Revising the Urban Separator map to reflect the negotiated modifications to the Renton
Urban Separator, as indicated on the map in Attachment 2 to this staff report
Additionally, the ordinance would ratify these changes on behalf of the population of
unincorporated King County, as required by Countywide Planning Policy FW-1, Step 9
Amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies become effective when ratified by ordinance
or resolution by at least 30% of the city and county governments representing 70% of the
population of King County according to the Interlocal agreement A city shall be deemed to
have ratified the countywide planning policy unless, within 90 days of adoption by King County,
the city by legislative action disapproves the Countywide Planning Policy.
ATTACHMENTS:
1 Proposed Ordinance 2003-0125, with attachments
2 Map of Renton Urban Separator
C 1WINDOWSITEMP 003-0125(CPPM nE t%-Rmw Urban Sepenla)(3-19-03)dm 512laD03050 AM
� ������ aa loon -J � -�� •
� loop
... �� ■ • /%C,.,.�-dip R+J�..o—P/o�
0ATOM
rya
II
1�
� 3YU Fog;Elm
0 OOJ -o
Mill
� ■■i■111� ■■�1�� 1 i711111�� - 1�
Renton51
ME W..- MEIN!
Legend
• . - • . •
Urban Separators
+ Ci
KING COUNTY 1200 Mag Cmuty Cmahmse
516 7hnd Avmuc
Sulc,WA 98104
Signature Report ea
May 20, 2003
Ordinance14655
Proposed No. 2003-0126.1 Sponsors Hague
I AN ORDINANCE adopting amendments to the
2 Countywide Planning Policies; designating Totem Lake as
3 an Urban Center;ratifying the amended Countywide
4 Planning Policies for unincorporated King County; and
5 amending Ordinance 10450, Section 3,as amended, and
Io 6 K.C.C. 20.10.030 and Ordinance 10450,Section 4, as
7 amended,and K C.0 20 10 040
8
9
10 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY:
11 SECTION 1. Findings. The council makes the following findings.
12 A. The metropolitan King County council adopted and ratified the Growth
13 Management Planning Council recommended King County 2012-Countywide Planning
14 Policies (Phase 1)in July 1992,under Ordinance 10450.
15 B. The metropolitan King County council adopted and ratified the Phase H
16 amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies on August 15, 1994,under Ordinance
17 11446.
0
I
Ordinance14655
18 C. The Growth Management Planning Council met on October 23, 2002 and
19 voted to recommend amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning
20 Policies,designating Totem Lake as an Urban Center.
21 SECTION 2. Ordinance 10450, Section 3,as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.030 are
22 each hereby amended to read as follows:
23 Phase 11.
24 A. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide Planning
25 Policies attached to Ordinance 11446 are hereby approved and adopted.
i
26 B. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning
27 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment I to Ordinance 12027
28 C. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012- Countywide Planning
29 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12421.
30 D. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning
31 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 and 2 to Ordinance 13260.
i
32 E. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning
I
33 Policies are amended,as shown by Attachment I through 4 to Ordinance 13415.
34 F. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning
35 Policies are amended,as shown by Attachments I through 3 to Ordinance 13858.
36 G. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012—Countywide Planning
37 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment I to Ordinance 14390.
38 H. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012—Countywide Planning
39 Policies are amended,as shown by Attachment I to Ordinance 14391.
2
Ordinance 14655
40 1 The Phase 11 Amendments to the King County 2012—Countywide Planning
41 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment I to Ordinance 14392.
42 1 The Phase ll Amendments to the Icing County 2012—Countywide Planning
43 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to this ordinance.
44 SECTION 3. Ordinance 10450, Section 4, as amended, and K.0 C.20 10.040 are
45 each hereby amended to read as follows:
46 Ratification for unincorporated King County.
47 A. Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 10450 for the purposes
48 specified are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County.
49 B. The amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance
50 10840 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated Icing County
51 C. The amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance
52 11061 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County
53 D The Phase II amendments to the Icing County 2012 Countywide Planning
54 Policies adopted by Ordinance 11446 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of
55 unincorporated King County.
56 E. The amendments to the Icing County 2012 -Countywide Planning Policies,as
57 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12027 are hereby ratified on behalf of the
58 population of unincorporated King County.
59 F. The amendments to the Icing County 2012- Countywide Planning Policies, as
60 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12421, are hereby ratified on behalf of the
61 population of unincorporated King County.
3
Ordinance 14655
62 G. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies, as
63 shown by Attachments 1 and 2 to Ordinance 13260, are hereby ratified on behalf of the
64 population of unincorporated King County.
65 H. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies, as
66 shown by Attachment 1 through 4 to Ordinance 13415, are hereby ratified on behalf of
67 the population of unincorporated King County.
68 1. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies,as
69 shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 13858, are hereby ratified on behalf of
70 the population of unincorporated King County.
I
71 J. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies, as
72 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14390, are hereby ratified on behalf of the
73 population of unincorporated King County.
•
74 K. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies,as
I
75 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14391, are hereby ratified on behalf of the
76 population of unincorporated King County.
77 L. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies, as
78 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14392, are hereby ratified on behalf of the
79 population of unincorporated King County.
80 M The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies, as
4
Ordinance 14655
81 shown by Attachment I to this ordinance, are hereby ratified on behalf of thepovulation
82 of unincorporated King County.
83
Ordinance 14655 was introduced on 3/17/2003 and passed by the Metropolitan King
County Council on 5/1 912 0 0 3,by the following vote-
Yes. 12-Ms.Sullivan,Ms.Edmonds,Mr. von Retchbauer,Ms.Lambert,Mr.
Philbps,Mr.Pelt,Mr.McKenna,Mr. Constantine, Mr. Gossett,Ms. Hague,
Mr. Irons and Ms. Patterson
No: 0
Excused: 0
KING COUNTY COUNCIL
KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON
ynthia Sullivan,Chair
ATTEST.
cD
Anne Noris,Clerk of the Council
f
� N
F'
APPROVED this "thday of Mi2i —2003.
;Sj ountyExecutive
Attachments 1 GMPC Motion 02-6
5
Attachment I
2003-0126
14655
October 23, 2002
Sponsored By: Executive Committee
1 MOTION NO. 02.6
2 A MOTION to amend the Countywide Planning Policies by
3 designating Totem Lake as an Urban Center. Totem Lake is
4 added to the list of Urban Centers following Countywide
5 Planning Policy LU-39.
6
7
8 WHEREAS, A goal of the Growth Management Act is to encourage development in Urban
9 Areas where adequate public facilities exist or can be provided in an efficient manner;
10
11 WHEREAS, Policy LU-39 of the Countywide Planning Policies of Icing County describes
12 the criteria for Urban Center designation;
13
14 WHEREAS, Policy LU40 of the Countywide Planning Policies of King County describes
15 standards for planned land uses within Urban Centers;
16
17 WHEREAS, the City of Kirkland has demonstrated that Totem Lake meets the criteria for
18 designation as an Urban Center, and that Kirkland's "Totem Lake Activity Area"
19 designated on the City's comprehensive plan land use map is consistent with the standards
20 established by the Countywide Planning Policies for Urban Center designation.
21
22 WHEREAS, King County Comprehensive Plan Policy U-106 supports the development of
23 Urban Centers to meet the region's needs for housing, jobs, services, culture and
24 recreation.
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
1 14655
2
3
4
5 THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLANNING COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY
6 HEREBY MOVES AS FOLLOWS-
7
8 Totem Lake is designated as an Urban Center. The list of Urban Centers following
9 Countywide Planning Policy LU-39 is modified to include Totem Lake.
10
11 ADOPTED by the Growth Management Planning Council of King County on
12 October 23, 2002 in open session.
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20 (Q4;14"2
21 Ron Sims,Chair, Growth Management Planning Council
VG'MPd2002GMPC(Moaw02-6Am
® 0
Metropolitan King County Council
Growth Management and Unincorporated Areas Committee
Staff Report
Agenda Item: 9 Name: Lauren Smith
Proposed Ordinance: 2003-0126 Date: March 18, 2003
Attending: Paul Reitenbach, King County DDES
Kevin Wright, King County PAO
SUBJECT:
Proposed Ordinance 2003-0126 adopting amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies;
designating Totem Lake as an Urban Center, ratifying the amended Countywide Planning
Policies on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County
BACKGROUND:
The Growth Management Planning Council (GMPC) is a formal body comprised of elected
officials from King County, Seattle, Bellevue, the Suburban Cities, and Special Districts The
GMPC was created in 1990 in response to a provision in the Washington State Growth
Management Act (GMA) requiring cities and counties to work together to adopt Countywide
Planning Policies (CPPs) Under GMA, countywide planning policies serve as the framework
for each individual jurisdiction's comprehensive plan, and ensure regional consistency with
respect to land use planning efforts The GMPC drafted the CPPs, which were then adopted by
the King County Council and ratified by the cities Changes to the CPPs are recommended by
the GMPC, adopted by the King County Council, and ratified by the cities
City of Kirkland requests Urban Center designation for Totem Lake
In 2002, the City of Kirkland requested that Totem Lake be designated as an Urban Center in
the Countywide Planning Policies. Urban Centers are envisioned in the CPPs as areas of
concentrated employment and housing, with direct service by high-capacity transit, and a wide
range of other land uses. They are expected to account for up to one half of King County's
employment growth and one quarter of household growth over the next 20 years
In January, 2002 the Kirkland City Council adopted a new plan for the Totem Lake
neighborhood that would support its designation as an Urban Center. Totem Lake, which is
located in the northeast corner of Kirkland, encompasses about one square mile and includes
residential, office, retail, light industrial and institutional uses.
Designating Totem Lake as an Urban Center would involve amending Countywide Planning
Policy LU-39 to add it to the list of existing Urban Centers, which currently includes:
Bellevue c• Redmond Overlake a Seattle CBD
Kent n Redmond CBD . Seattle Center
t Federal Way Renton CBD %% First/Capitol Hill
C tWINDOWSITEMP12003-0126(CPPAme d.ls Tolem Lake Ur n Cen1erX3.16-03)dM 5212D03 8 51 AM
•r University District . Northgate Tukwila
In order to be designated as an Urban Center, jurisdictions must meet specific criteria in the
Countywide Planning Policies, including having planned land uses to accommodate
o A minimum of 15,000 jobs within one-half mile of a transit center,
At a minimum, an average of 50 employees per gross acre, and
a At a minimum, an average of 15 households per acre
When fully realized, Urban Centers shall be characterized by the following
e• Clearly defined geographic boundaries;
:• An intensity/density of land uses sufficient to support effective and rapid transit;
Pedestrian emphasis within the Center,
a Emphasis on superior urban design which reflects the local community,
Limitations on single-occupancy vehicle usage during peak commute hours;
A broad array of land uses and choices within those land uses for employees and
residents;
Sufficient public open spaces and recreational opportunities, and
Uses which provide both daytime and nighttime activities in the Center.
The intequnsdictional staff team analyzed the Totem Lake neighborhood against all of the
criteria in the Countywide Planning Policies governing Urban Centers, and found that an Urban
Center designation would be appropriate, for the following reasons.
:• The City of Kirkland has completed the necessary planning to support an Urban Center
designation.
By 2012, Totem Lake is projected to contain over 4,500 housing units and 21,400 jobs
Totem Lake is planned as a transit oriented development district with very high
residential and commercial intensity
A new transit center will be constructed at the center of the transit oriented development
district.
Within %2 mile of the transit center, 11,000 jobs and 2000 housing units are projected by
2012 Another 3,000 to 4,000 jobs are expected by 2022
Employment densities in Totem Lake are planned for a minimum of 130 jobs per acre
(net), and will reach approximately 40 jobs per gross acre by 2022.
Residential densities are planned for 50-75 units/acre (net) Capacity will remain for
additional job and housing growth beyond 2022.
e• Other comprehensive plan policies are in place to support pedestrian emphasis,job
creation and re-investment, redevelopment, high density residential and high intensity
commercial uses, design principles, infrastructure, parks and open space, and
community services.
SUMMARY:
Proposed Ordinance 2003-0126 would amend the Countywide Planning Policies by
♦ Adding Totem Lake to the list of Urban Centers in Policy LU-39
Additionally, the ordinance would ratify the change on behalf of the population of
unincorporated King County, as required by Countywide Planning Policy FW-1, Step 9.
Amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies become effective when ratified by ordinance
or resolution by at least 30% of the city and county governments representing 70% of the
population of King County according to the Interlocal agreement. A city shall be deemed to
C1WINDOWSITEMP12003-026(CPPAm Wn nM•Totem Lake UrbanC )(3-16.03)Doc 521/2003651 AM
have ratified the countywide planning policy unless, within 90 days of adoption by King County,
the city by legislative action disapproves the Countywide Planning Policy
ATTACHMENTS:
1 Proposed Ordinance 2003-0126, with attachments
C\WINDDWSITEMP12003.0126(CPP Amedwnts-Taem Lake UNan Center)(3-18-03)e 5212003651 AM
KING COUNTY 1200 King my Cwrho
96flc W 9810 Third
Snide,WA 9810d
Signature Report
May 20, 2003
Ordinance 14656
Proposed No. 2003-0127 1 Sponsors Hague
1 AN ORDINANCE adopting amendments to the
2 Countywide Planning Policies addressing the long-term
3 protection of agricultural production districts;ratifying the
4 amended Countywide Planning Policies for unincorporated
5 King County; and amending Ordinance 10450, Section 3,
6 as amended, and KC C 20.10 030 and Ordinance 10450,
7 Section 4,as amended, and K C.0 20.10 040
8
9
10 BE IT ORDAINED BY TBE COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY•
11 SECTION 1. Findings. The council makes the following findings.
12 A- The metropolitan King County council adopted and ratified the Growth
13 Management Planning Council recommended King County 2012-Countywide Planning
14 Policies (Phase I)in July 1992,under Ordinance 10450.
15 B. The metropolitan King County council adopted and ratified the Phase H
16 amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies on August 15, 1994,under Ordinance
17 11446.
I
Ordinance 14656 ,
18 C. The Growth Management Planning Council met on June 16, 1999, and
19 adopted Motion 99-3, recommending amendments to the King County 2012 -
i
20 Countywide Planning Policies addressing the long-term protection of agricultural
21 production districts; adopting new policies LU-2A and LU-2B,revising the interim
I
22 potential annexation area map so that the lower green river valley agricultural production
23 district is not within the potential annexation area of any city, and drawing the urban
24 growth area boundary around the lower green river valley agricultural production district
25 to clarify that it is outside of the urban growth area.
26 E. The King County Council adopted Motion 11208 on May 21,2001,requesting
27 that the GMPC review and reconsider its Motion 99-3 and provide for a thorough public
28 process,including opportunities for public testimony.
29 D. The Growth Management Planning Council met on September 26, 2001 and
30 adopted Motion 01-2,reaffrmung Motion 99-3.
31 SEC170N 2. Ordinance 10450, Section 3, as amended, and K.0 C.20.10 030 are
i
32 each hereby amended to read as follows:
I
33 Phase I1.
34 A. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide Planning
35 Policies attached to Ordinance 11446 are hereby approved and adopted
36 B. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning
37 Policies are amended,as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12027.
38 C. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning
39 Policies are amended,as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12421.
2
Ordinance 14656
40 D. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning
41 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 and 2 to Ordinance 13260
42 E. The Phase 11 Amendments to the Kmg County 2012-Countywide Planning
43 Policies are amended,as shown by Attachment l through 4 to Ordinance 13415.
44 F. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning
45 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 13858.
46 G. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012—Countywide Planning
47 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment I to Ordinance 14390.
48 H. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012—Countywide Planning
49 Policies are amended,as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14391.
50 I The Phase H Amendments to the Ktng County 2012—Countywide Planning
51 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14392.
52 J. The Phase 11 Amendments to the King County 2012—Countywide Plammne
53 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments I and 2 to this ordinance.
54 SECTION 3. Ordinance 10450, Section 4,as amended, and K C C. 20.10,040 are
55 each hereby amended to read as follows:
56 Ratification for unincorporated King County.
57 A. Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 10450 for the purposes
58 specified are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County.
59 B. The amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance
60 10840 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County.
61 C. The amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance
62 11061 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County.
3
Ordinance 14656
63 D. The Phase II amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide Planning
64 PoIicies adopted by Ordinance 11446 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of
65 unincorporated King County.
i
66 E. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies, as
67 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12027 are hereby ratified on behalf of the
68 population of unincorporated King County.
69 F. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies,as
70 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12421,are hereby ratified on behalf of the
71 population of unincorporated King County.
72 G. The amendments to the Kmg County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies,as
73 shown by Attachments 1 and 2 to Ordinance 13260, are hereby ratified on behalf of the
74 population of unincorporated King County.
75 H. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies,as
76 shown by Attachment 1 through 4 to Ordinance 13415, are hereby ratified on behalf of
77 the population of unincorporated King County.
78 I The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies,as
79 shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 13858, are hereby ratified on behalf of
80 the population of unincorporated King County.
81 J. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies,as
i82 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14390, are hereby ratified on behalf of the
83 population of unincorporated King County.
i
4
Ordinance 14656
84 K. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies, as
85 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14391, are hereby ratified on behalf of the
86 population of unincorporated King County.
87 L. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies, as
88 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14392, are hereby ratified on behalf of the
89 population of unincorporated King County
90 M. The amendments to the King County 2012- Countywide Plannine Policies as
5
Ordinance 14656
91 shown by Attachments 1 and 2 to this ordinance, are hereby ratified on behalf of the
92 population of unincorporated King County.
93
Ordinance 14656 was introduced on 3/17/2003 and passed by the Metropolitan King
County Council on 5/1 912 0 0 3,by the following vote:
Yes: 12-Ms. Sullivan,Ms.Edmonds,Mr. von Reichbauer,Ms.Lambert,Mr.
Phillips,Mr. Pelz,Mr. McKenna,Mr. Constantine,Mr.Gossett,Ms.Hague,
Mr.Irons and Ms.Patterson
No:0
Excused. 0
KING COUNTY COUNCIL
KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON
I ,
Cynthia Sullivan,Chair w
ATTEST.
r
Anne Noris,Clerk of the Council
N
APPROVED this e- day of 0141 2003.
Ron ,County Execute
Attachments 1 GMPC Motion 99-3,2 GMPC Motion 01-2
6
Attachment 2
2003-0127
14656
September 26,2001
Sponsored By: Executive Committee
/pr
1 MOTION NO. 01-2
2 A MOTION reaffirming Motion 99-3 passed by the GMPC on June 16,
3 1999 amending the Countywide Planning Policies to add new policies that
4 address the long-term governance of Agricultural Production Districts
5
6 WHEREAS,The Growth Management Act requires the maintenance,enhancement and
7 conservation of agricultural industries and lands through a variety of methods and programs;
8
9 WHEREAS,King County residents have supported efforts to preserve good farmland and active
10 farms for the value of local crops,dairy and livestock and for scenic and historic values;
11
12 WHEREAS,King County,through the Farmlands Preservation Program,has purchased the
13 development rights of 12,600 acres of farmland and has established the Agricultural Production
14 Districts(APDs)to further protect these and adjacent prime agricultural lands;
15
16 WHEREAS,the Lower Green River APD is completely surrounded by Urban designated lands and
17 as such is under immense pressure for development and annexation,and
18
19 WHEREAS,King County and the City of Auburn have signed an mterlocal agreement that
20 removes the southern portion of the Lower Green APD out of the city's potential annexation area.
21 THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLANNING COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY HEREBY
22 MOVES AS FOLLOWS:
23
24 Reaffirm the unanimous vote by this Council on June 16, 1999 to add the following new
25 Countywide Planning Policies:
26
27 LU-2A Designated Agricultural Production District lands shall not be annexed by
28 cities.
29
30 LU-213 The Lower Green River Agricultural Production District is a regionally
31 designated resource that is to remain in unincorporated King County.
32 Preservation of the Lower Green River Agricultural Production District will
33 provide an urban separator as surrounding Urban areas are annexed and
34 developed. King County may contract with other jurisdictions to provide
35 some local services to this area as appropriate
14656
1
2 In the event that this motion is ratified by the member junsdictions of Growth Management
3 Planning Council,then the Interim Potential Annexation Area Map shall be revised
4 accordingly and the Urban Growth Boundary will be drawn around the Lower Green
5 Agricultural Production District (APD)to clarify that the APD is outside of the Urban area.
6
7 ADOPTED by the Growth Management Planning Council of King County on September 26,2001
8 in open session
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16 On ims, h " ,Growtb Management Planning Council
17
i/GMPCJ2W1GMPCJMo1=01-2 d. - 2 -
Metropolitan King County Council
Growth Management and Unincorporated Areas Committee
Staff Report
Agenda Item: 10 Name: Lauren Smith
Proposed Ordinance: 2003-0127 Date: March 18, 2003
Attending: Paul Reitenbach, King County DDES
Kevin Wright, King County PAO
SUBJECT:
Proposed Ordinance 2003-0127 adopts amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies
addressing the long term protection of Agricultural Production Districts, and ratifies the
amended Countywide Planning Policies on behalf of the population of unincorporated King
County.
BACKGROUND:
The Growth Management Planning Council (GMPC) is a formal body comprised of elected
officials from King County, Seattle, Bellevue, the Suburban Cities, and Special Districts The
. GMPC was created in 1990 in response to a provision in the Washington State Growth
Management Act (GMA) requiring cities and counties to work together to adopt Countywide
Planning Policies (CPPs). Under GMA, countywide planning policies serve as the framework
for each individual jurisdiction's comprehensive plan, and ensure regional consistency with
respect to land use planning efforts The GMPC drafted the CPPs, which were then adopted by
the King County Council and ratified by the cities Changes to the CPPs are recommended by
the GMPC, adopted by the King County Council, and ratified by the cities
GMPC Actions
In June of 1999, the GMPC adopted Substitute Motion 99-3, recommending amendments to the
King County Countywide Planning Policies, as follows
Recommendation #1. Add two new policies addressing the long-term governance of
Agricultural Production Districts•
LU-2A Designated Agricultural Production Districts shall not be annexed by cities
LU-2B The Lower Green River Valley Agricultural Production District is a regionally
designated resource that is to remain in unincorporated King County Preservation of
the Lower Green River Valley Agricultural Production District will provide an urban
separator as surrounding urban areas are annexed and developed King County may
contract with other jurisdictions to provide some local services to this area as
appropriate.
C 1WINDDWSYTEMFl20D3-0127(CPP Amendments•Lower Green River Vapey APDX3.1"3)doc 512120D3 851 AM
Recommendation #2. Amend the Potential Annexation Area (PAA) Map in the CPPs so that
the Lower Green River Valley APO does not appear within the FAA boundaries of any
jurisdiction.
Recommendation #3. Amend the Urban Growth Area map by drawing the Urban Growth Area
Boundary around the Lower Green River Valley APD. This is to clarify its classification as long-
term resource land, and to emphasize that although it is located west of the main urban-rural
boundary line, it is not considered urban.
King County Council Actions
In 1999, the King County Council amended the King County Comprehensive Plan to be
consistent with the GMPC recommendations contained in Motion 99-3, by adopting policies R-
513 and R-544 (see below), and by drawing the Urban Growth Area Boundary around the
Lower Green River Valley APD (see Attachment 2).
R-513 Designated Forest and Agricultural Production District lands shall not be annexed by
cities.
R-544 The Lower Green River Agricultural Production District is a regionally designated
resource that is to remain in unincorporated King County The Lower Green River
Agricultural Production District functions as an urban separator between the cities of
Kent and Auburn. King County may contract with other jurisdictions to provide some
local services to this area as appropriate
In 2000, the King County Council further amended the King County Comprehensive Plan by
adopting Policy R-543, which also supports the GMPC's recommendations in Motion 99-3.
R-543 King County commits to preserve Agricultural Production District parcels in or near
the Urban Growth Area because of their high production capabilities, their proximity
to markets, and their value as open space.
Finally, in 2001 the King County Council considered the adoption of Proposed Ordinance 2002-
0256, which would have amended the CPPs consistent with the recommendations of the
GMPC and with the changes already made to the King County Comprehensive Plan. However,
because the County was engaged in negotiations to purchase certain properties within the
Lower Green River Valley APD, and out of concerns that the GMPC had adopted their
recommendations in the absence of a quorum and without an adequate public review process,
the Council did not adopt the Proposed Ordinance Instead, the Council adopted Motion 11208
(see Attachment 3), which remanded the GMPC motion back to the GMPC for further review
and reconsideration Motion 11208 also directed the County Executive to complete
negotiations with property owners in the Lower Green River Valley APD in the earliest possible
timeframe.
On September 26, 2001 the GMPC reconsidered its actions with respect to Motion 99-3, and
via the adoption of Motion 01-2, reaffirmed those actions.
On November 20, 2002 King County executed the fee simple purchase of what is known as the
Nelson property in the Lower Green River Valley APD, thus fulfilling the second mandate of 46
Motion 11208
C 1WIND0WSITEMP12W3-0127(CPP AmoMm •Lacier Greco Rv Vaky APDN3.1"3)Eoc 52WO03851 AM
With these two actions complete, the King County Council is asked to consider once again
amending the Countywide Planning Policies as recommended by the GMPC in Motions 99-3
and 01-2
SUMMARY:
Proposed Ordinance 2003-0127 would amend the Countywide Planning Policies by
• Adding policies LU-2A and LU-213 addressing the long-term governance of Agricultural
Production Districts,
♦ Amending the Interim Potential Annexation Area Map to illustrate that the Lower Green
River Valley APD is not within the PAA of any jurisdiction, and
♦ Amending the land use map in the CPPs to illustrate that the Lower Green River Valley APD
is outside the boundaries of the Urban Growth Area.
Additionally, the ordinance would ratify the changes on behalf of the population of
unincorporated King County, as required by Countywide Planning Policy FW-1 Amendments
to the Countywide Planning Policies become effective when ratified by ordinance or resolution
by at least 30% of the city and county governments representing 70% of the population of King
County according to the Interlocal agreement. A city shall be deemed to have ratified the
countywide planning policy unless, within 90 days of adoption by King County, the city by
legislative action disapproves the Countywide Planning Policy
ATTACHMENTS:
1 Proposed Ordinance 2003-0127, with attachments
2 Map Lower Green River Valley Agricultural Production District
3 King County Motion 11208, Adopted May 21, 2000
C%WINDOWSITEMP,2003-0127(CPPAmeiMm s-Lower Green Fbw Vasey APDN}1"3)dec 521R003851AM
YI
Urban Sub-Areas
N lakeo1NeN� wood) xE /,•• r...,,
park
aresf
AShoreline ealna� Duvall
i l
f � 1
Seanle I 1
NinlandRedmond
� 1 1
SEX-St! , E p F _ I , 1 mnwn a.al
1 `
Ic
Bellevue 1
E/r f
/p O
Newca �J f / 5
/
ene
Y __
HdI
, _ - - -
z ,� CITIES
Rural P
Area _ I
H ,
` 1
Rural
Area
Word \ \\
sm4mllj�\
,soutr> Ew '
�IAst sl ARU
r—Bural cmu la
WvA Urban ftwM Boundary
Urban Ulua�rporeted y
Rural Unincorporated
w� �,
-' 'R6 wY•Wtt `• a uS
N- _ a1- iosa Rsa � iamsnsa s..r awi '_ _� aswaeol��F �'
� a
----- -----' 'T
—_—
Hill
�
I
�l?Nm l-
mj y � r-.3—
_ _ v
P'\;1.'v'�',.rC�-Y�g"£.�` ._ ,.Y�1� _ tp53� II___4___„P• .
E_I ar __ I--_ hxerms - • - -r �n';x t's' 1 A �5 _Atz
SQ � m __ •I� bw nnns= suMaf'• _-s.nvwse — _— �..tl ��?-�.,�'�'s?' � _ — 9 —a I �_ I _ --
TI
L —�GW '_ l—
1 s.lr aoT lss—
L-g..raexa_wrr c.wL!a �-i_—
a
-
li -g*rva�ee� �5g sa—��_-- _ _ �• ., vwe�l_ y. ,yam". s _`„ �G _ _ —.w+sa�
x �a- •a _ C��u -� — .w wcs - r' ^I ls.+r zi��'�a - � e
rmlmw asr—�
_
cy ur as �'• r
-U'AdeMM �6.rtlVOh �6.ry WY 80. •i _ I F i�• ���`��S=F=�,Q�� rly
a
— - � { .^4"=a�`+•""i'�'d,.�' _ %�`s`is;..•L i Yrsr� �1 i I
_ ``<>} F-�" ,ram✓4�`.`t.z..'�''v:..., `_��`.�-', .s - .�„�
�- }°'1 `i-��-..__.^'v._•Its j �.._,_., -_ _ y�_ "�.„,,-�..s,'y� - 3 r err%=' "_ _
1 l =oa
�� I•l 4 �,,� � __ "ti e+*,:.ems i°"•":4`s��," �e�.,�*x�,�a:$" saris
a4 a suvass
s VA s a wN
� s a d su R¢s
g � �sMr� shwa
-• i a6 € a
N= a a6 tla. a d A S k`
iJ W4M N F
i e�N� �SITY6Y �'L INS '_ p� _ 2'� � , _1! sIJ VBr • m � ✓'66Nb PN1
-R � �.� ($ 8W'VT 9atl VN b a Sv.YY61
iBWy�A a x £. 6M VG H Otw�r �bMSr a _ �ba61
� ' ~r�rQ• 3 ��5_ FFF P9�8F 'qyp =b ,6y a R fiWw"'r � 3
-�-
Revds�d
/ Kent City Council Meeting
�p Date August 5, 2003
Category Consent Calendar
1 SUBJECT: CITY OF AUBURN HOME REPAIR AGREEMENT RENEWAL —
AUTHORIZE
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Authorize the Mayor to sign the agreement with the
City of Auburn to continue to provide Home Repair services to residents in 2003,
subject to approval of final contract terms by the City Attorney.
An interlocal agreement outlining the services and compensation would be entered into
with the City of Auburn. The agreement would reimburse Kent for all costs associated
with the program, and would include an administrative fee of 101/16 of the contract, or
$15,000.00.
3. EXHIBITS: Staff overview and City of Auburn Home Repair agreement
4. RECOMMENDED BY: Staff and Parks Committee
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 6G
Staff Report
Background
The City of Kent provided Home Repair Services funded by Auburn Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG)during 2002 to Auburn residents The City of Auburn
was pleased with the services and wishes to continue to contract with the City of Kent to
provide services for the 2003 program year
Program Description
The City of Kent Home Repair Program will continue to provide:
La, Minor Home Repair services to qualified Auburn residents
a Ma/or Home Repair services performed by contractors to qualified Auburn residents
A Emergency Home Repair services performed by Home Repair staff and/or
contractors based on need
& Monthly reports meeting all HUD Community Development Block Grant requirements
To accomplish the above the Kent Home Repair Program will provide:
IZI Home Repair Specialist— 12 FTE
Q Van
• Tools and materials
• Administration based on 10%of the contract or$15,000
Q Additional resource and referral services.
Q Monthly service reports and billings
The City of Auburn will provide:
10 Client referrals
0 Priority preferences for services
0 Initial intake
EI Loan processing
The City of Auburn will provide financial remuneration as follows:
10 A one-year interlocal agreement for$150,000
0 Reimbursement monthly for one-twelfth of the total grant equal to$12,500
Program Outcomes and Performance Measures
Outcomes
Increase the home safety of low and moderate-income homeowners
Improved condition of the housing stock for low and moderate income homeowners
Performance Measures
40 Unduplicated City of Auburn clients
400 Minor home repairs
15 Major home repairs
Proposed Program Budget
The following budget is based on current knowledge of Home Repair Services provided in
the City of Kent and work completed in Auburn in prior year
Annual Monthly
Personnel Costs $71,446 $5,953 90
(includes salary and
benefits) 75 FTE
Vehicle and $10,080 $840
transportation costs
Tools,materials,and $15,074 $1,256 17
equipment
Administration Costs $15,000 $1,250 00
Contracted Services E $38,000 $3,166 60
Communications $400 $33 33
Total $150,000 $12500.00
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends the following
1) The City of Kent and the City of Auburn enter a one-year interlocal agreement for Kent
to provide Home Repair Services in the City of Auburn
AGREEMENT
Between The
CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON
AND
THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON
THIS AGREEMENT, entered into this day of 2003, between The
City of Auburn, State of Washington, and City of Kent, State of Washington.
WHEREAS, The City of Auburn is an entitlement applicant for Community Development Block
Grant (CDBG) funds under the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 (the Act),Pub.
L. 93-383 as amended, and will receive CDBG funds for the purpose of carrying out eligible
community development and housing activities under the Act and under regulations promulgated
by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) at 24 CFR Part 570; and
WHEREAS, The City of Auburn desires to award certain funds to the The City of Kent for use as
described within this Agreement, for the purpose of implementing eligible activities under the Act
and HUD regulations; and
WHEREAS,It is appropriate and mutually desirable that the The City of Kent be designated by The
City of Auburn to undertake the aforementioned eligible activities, so long as the requirements of
the Act, HUD Regulations, State law and local law are adhered to, as provided for herein, and
WHEREAS, The purpose of this Agreement is to provide for cooperation between The City of Auburn
and the The City of Kent , in implementing such eligible activities in the manner described herein;
and
WHEREAS, The Legislature has declared that carrying out the purposes of federal grants or programs
is both a public purpose and an appropriate function for a city,town, county, or public corporation;
and
WHEREAS, the provisions of RCW 35 21.730 through RCW 35 21 755 and RCW 35 21 660 and
35 21 670 and the enabling authority as herein conferred to implement these provisions are hereby
construed to accomplish the purpose of RCW 35 21.730 through RCW 35 21.755;
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of payments, covenants, and agreements hereinafter
mentioned, to be made and performed by the parties hereto, the parties mutually covenant and agree
as provided for in this Agreement
PART I GENERAL CONDITIONS:
1. Scope of Agreement
2. Scope of Project
3. Commencement and Termination of Projects
4. Administration
5 Compensation and Method of Payment
6 Failure to Perform
7. Operating Budget
8. Funding Alternatives and Future Support
9. Amendments
10. Assignment and Subcontracting
11. Hold Harmless and Indemnification
12 Insurance
13. Conflict of Interest
14. Termination
15 Reversion of Assets
PART II FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS:
1 Procurement Standards
2. Environmental Review
3. Nondiscrimination
4. Labor Standards
5 Property Management
6. Acquisition and Relocation
7. National Flood Insurance
8. Lead-Based Paint Poisoning
9. Administrative Requirements and Cost Principles
10. Other Federal Requirements
11. Non-substitution for Local Funding
12. Public Ownership
13. Public Information
14. Lobbying
15. Religious Organizations
PART III EVALUATION AND RECORD KEEPING:
1. Evaluation
2 Audits and Inspections
3 Miscellaneous Records
4 Retention of Records
5. Reports
PART IV Attachments
PART V ACCEPTANCE AND SIGNATURES
PART I. GENERAL CONDITIONS:
1. SCOPE Or AGREEMENT:
The Agreement between the parties shall consist of the signature page; the general conditions,
the Federal, State and local program requirements, the evaluation and record keeping
• requirements; each and every project Exhibit and Attachment incorporated into the Agreement,
all matters and laws incorporated by reference herein; and any written amendments made
according to the general conditions. This Agreement supersedes any and all former agreements
applicable to projects governed by this Agreement.
2. SCOPE OF PROJECT:
The The City of Kent shall use funds only to perform the activities set forth in the Attachments
hereto. In the case of multiple projects, each project shall correspond to a separate set of
Attachments This Agreement may be amended from time to time, in accordance with the
general conditions, for the purpose of adding new projects, amending the scope of work, or for
any other lawful purpose.
3. COMMENCEMENT AND TERMINATION OF PROJECTS:
A Upon release of project-related funds by HUD pursuant to 24 CFR Part 58, The City of Auburn
shall furnish the The City of Kent with written notice to proceed. No work on a project shall
occur prior to the notice to proceed without written approval from the City Termination dates
for individual projects shall be specified in the appropriate Attachments Costs incurred after
the termination date will not be reimbursed The termination date may be changed through
amendment of this Agreement
B Upon termination of individual projects covered by this Agreement, the The City of Kent shall
transfer to The City of Auburn any CDBG funds on hand at the time of termination and any
accounts receivable attributable to the use of CDBG funds
4. ADMINISTRATION:
The The City of Kent shall appoint a liaison who shall be responsible for overall administration
of CDBG funded project(s) and coordination with The City of Auburn of Auburn's Department
of Planning and Community Development The The City of Kent shall also designate one or
more representatives who shall be authorized to sign the Voucher Reimbursement Requests and
Program Accomplishments Forms The names of the liaison and representatives shall be
specified in the Attachment(s).
5. COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT:
A The City of Auburn shall reimburse the The City of Kent only for the activities specified in the
Attachments in an amount not to exceed the amount specified on Attachment #1 -- "CDBG
APPROPRIATION"Reimbursement shall be based on a CDBG Voucher Reimbursement
Request and Program Accomplishments Form submitted and signed by the The City of Kent 's
authorized representative Reimbursement is subject to the terms of Section 6 of this Part I
B The The City of Kent shall submit a properly executed Voucher Reimbursement Request and
Program Accomplishments Form as frequently as desired,but at a minimum no later than
fifteen (15) working days after the close of each calendar quarter throughout the term of the
project The City of Auburn will make payment to the The City of Kent not more than forty-
five (45) working days after said Reimbursement Request is received and approved by the City
The City of Auburn will issue a statement of correction in the event that the Voucher
Reimbursement Request is erroneous. Payment does not constitute absolute approval.
C Any reimbursement must comply with conditions of Letter of Credit Procedure Regulations
1900.23 (Revised)in that funds on hand should not exceed $5,000 if retained beyond three(3)
days and that any reimbursement in excess of the amount required shall be returned to the City.
G. FAILURE TO PERFORM:
In the event of a failure to comply with any terms or conditions of this Contract or to provide in
any manner the activities or other performance as agreed to herein, The City of Auburn reserves
the right, following written notice to the The City of Kent, to withhold all or any part of
payment, suspend all or part of the contract, or prohibit the The City of Kent from incurring
additional obligations of funds until The City of Auburn is satisfied that corrective action has
been taken or completed as more specifically outlined in the Exlbit(s) and Attachment(s)to
this contract. The option to withhold funds is in addition to, and not in lieu of, the Citys right to
termination as provided in Section 14 of the General Conditions of this Agreement.
7. OPERATING BUDGET:
The The City of Kent shall apply the funds received from The City of Auburn under this
Agreement in accordance with the Budget Summary in the attached Exhibit(s). No line item
expense thereunder shall cause total expenditures charged to this Agreement to exceed the total
amount appropriated to the The City of Kent by The City of Auburn.
8. FUNDING ALTERNATIVES AND FUTURE SUPPORT:
A. The The City of Kent shall report all project income generated under this Agreement for the
purposes specified herein or generated through the project(s) funded under this Agreement.
Such program income shall be treated in accordance with all applicable rules and regulations
found at 24 CFR 570 504.
B The City of Auburn makes no commitment to future support and assumes no obligation for
future support of the activities contracted herein, except as expressly set forth in this
Agreement
C. Should anticipated sources of revenue become unavailable to The City of Auburn for use in the
Community Development Block Grant Program, The City of Auburn shall immediately notify
the The City of Kent in writing and The City of Auburn will be released from all contracted
liability for that portion of the Agreement covered by funds not yet received by the City
9. AMENDMENTS:
Either party may request modifications in the scope of permissible activities, terms,or
conditions of this Agreement Proposed modifications which are mutually agreed upon shall be
incorporated by written amendment to this Agreement. A written amendment may affect a
project or projects authorized by this Agreement or may be of general application.
10. ASSIGNMENT AND SUBCONTRACTING:
A The The City of Kent shall not assign any portion of this Agreement without the written
consent of the City, and it is further agreed that said consent must be sought in writing by the
• The City of Kent not less than fifteen (15) days prior to the date of any proposed assignment
B. Any work or services assigned or subcontracted hereunder shall be subject to each provision of
this Agreement and proper bidding procedures contained herein The The City of Kent agrees
that it is as fully responsible to The City of Auburn for the acts and omissions of its
subcontractors and their employees and agents, as it is for the acts and omissions of its own
employees and agents, as provided in paragraph 11 B
11. HOLD HARMLESS AND INDEMNIFICATION:
A. The The City of Kent agrees that it is financially responsible(liable) for any audit exception or
other financial loss to The City of Auburn which occurs due to its negligence or its failure to
comply with the terms of this Agreement.
B The The City of Kent further agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its
elected and appointed officials, employees and agents from and against any and all claims,
demands and/or causes of action of any kind or character whatsoever arising out of or relating
to services provided under this Agreement by the The City of Kent , its employees,
subcontractors, or agents for any and all claims by any persons for alleged personal injury,
death, or damage to their persons or property to the extent caused by the negligent acts, errors
or omissions of the The City of Kent , its employees, agents, subcontractors or representatives
In the event that any suit or claim for damages based upon such claim, action, loss, or damages
is brought against the City, the The City of Kent shall defend the same at its sole cost and
expense, provided that The City of Auburn retains the right to participate in said suit if any
principle of governmental or public law is involved; and if final judgment be rendered against
The City of Auburn and/or its officers, agents, and/or employees or any of them or jointly
against The City of Auburn and the The City of Kent and its respective officers, agents,
subcontractors, employees or any of them, the The City of Kent agrees to fully satisfy the same
and the The City of Kent shall reimburse The City of Auburn for any cost and expense which
The City of Auburn has incurred as a result of such claim or suit The provisions of this section
shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement.
12. INSURANCE:
A. Public Liability Insurance.
The The City of Kent shall, at all times during the term of this Agreement, at its cost and
expense, carry and maintain general public liability insurance against claims for bodily injury,
personal injury, death or property damage occurrmg or arising out of services provided under
this Agreement, which insurance shall cover such claims as may be occasioned by any act,
omission, or negligence of the The City of Kent or its officers, agents, representatives, assigns
or servants. The limits of liability insurance,which may be increased from time to time as
deemed necessary by The City of Auburn with the approval of the The City of Kent which
shall not be unreasonably withheld, shall not be less than one million dollars ($1,000,000)
combined single limit personal injury and property damage insurance The insurance required
above shall be issued by an insurance company or companies authorized to do business within
the State of Washington and must be acceptable to the City. The City of Auburn shall be
specifically named as an additional insured on all such policies, and all such policy or policies
shall be primary to any other valid and collectible insurance.
B Building Risk Insurance:
The The City of Kent shall cause to be maintained, during the period that any construction
work is in progress, All Risk Builder's Insurance (mcluding fire, vandalism, malicious mischief
and extended coverage), in an amount not less than the value of destructible contract work in
place
C. Proof of Insurance-
Certificate or certificates or other evidence satisfactory to The City of Auburn evidencing the
existence and terms and conditions of all insurance required above shall be delivered to The
City of Auburn within five days of the The City of Kent's receipt of the Authorization to
Proceed. The policy or policies of insurance required to be maintained in accordance with this
Agreement shall not be canceled or given notice of non-renewal nor shall the terms or
conditions thereof be altered or amended without sixty(60) days written notice being given to
the City.
13. CONFLICT OF INTEREST:
A. Interest of Officers, Employees, or Agents-
No officer, employee, or agent of The City of Auburn or The City of Kent who exercises any
functions or responsibilities in connection with the planning and carrying out of The City of
Auburn of Auburn CDBG Program, or any other person who exercises any functions or
responsibilities in connection with the City, shall have any personal financial interest, direct or
indirect, in this Agreement, and the The City of Kent shall take appropriate steps to assure
compliance.
B. Interest of Contractor(s) and Their Employees:
The The City of Kent agrees that it will incorporate into every subcontract required to be in
writing, and made pursuant to this Agreement, the following or equivalent provisions.
The Contractor covenants that no person who presently exercises any functions or
responsibilities in connection with the CDBG Program,has any personal financial interest,
direct or indirect, in this Contract The Contractor further covenants that he or she presently
has no interest and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect,which would conflict in
any manner or degree with the performance of services hereunder. The Contractor further
covenants that in the performance of this Contract no person having any conflicting interest
shall be employed Any such interest on the part of the Contractor or the Contractor's
employees must be disclosed to the The City of Kent and the City
14. SUSPENSION AND TERMINATION:
A. This Agreement is subject to suspension or termination upon 30 days written notice by The City
of Auburn should•
1. The The City of Kent mismanage or make improper or unlawful use of CDBG funds,
2 The The City of Kent fail to comply with the terms and conditions expressed herein or the
applicable regulations and directives of the Federal Government, State, or City, •
3. CDBG funds become no longer available from the Federal Government or through the City,
4. The The City of Kent fail to carry out activities expressed by this Agreement; or
5. The The City of Kent fail to submit reports or submit incomplete or inaccurate reports in
any material respect.
• B. This Agreement is subject to suspension or tennmation upon 30 days written notice by the The
City of Kent should
1. The City of Auburn fail in its commitment under this Agreement to provide funding for
services rendered, as herein provided, or
2 CDBG funds become no longer available from the Federal Government or through the City
C. Tlus Agreement may be suspended or terminated at any time,in whole or in part,upon the
written agreement of The City of Auburn and the The City of Kent .
D. Otherwise this Agreement shall terminate on the termination date specified on Attachment#1
attached hereto and shall be subject to extension only by mutual agreement and amendment in
accordance with paragraph 9, Amendments, of this Part.
E. Upon termination of this Agreement, any unexpended balance of the CDBG funds awarded
through this Agreement shall lapse and remain in The City of Auburn of Auburn's CDBG fund
F. In the event that termination occurs under paragraph A(1) of this section, the The City of Kent
shall return to The City of Auburn all funds which were expended in violation of the terms of
this Agreement
15. REVERSION OF ASSETS:
Upon expiration of this Agreement, the The City of Kent shall transfer to The City of Auburn
any City CDBG funds on hand at the time of expiration any accounts receivable attributable to
the use of City CDBG funds.
In the event that the The City of Kent ceases to use any asset acquired or improved with CDBG
funds for the purpose described in this Agreement,within five years following the termination
of this agreement,the The City of Kent shall pay to The City of Auburn the fair market value
of the asset less any portion of the value attributable to expenditures of non-CDBG funds
PART IL FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS:
1. PROCUREMENT STANDARDS:
In awarding contracts pursuant to this Agreement, the The City of Kent shall comply with all
applicable requirements of local and State law for awarding contracts, including but not limited
to procedures for competitive bidding, contractor's bonds, and RCW60 28 010, which addresses
retained percentages. In addition, the The City of Kent shall comply with the requirements of
the U.S. Office of Management and Budget Circular A-110 and/or A-102 and/or A-133, as
applicable,relating to bonding, insurance and procurement standards, and with Executive Order
11246 regarding nondiscrimination in bid conditions for projects over$100,000 Where Federal
standards differ from local or State standards, the stricter standards shall apply The Federal
standard of$100,000 for competitive bidding shall apply only if the applicable State or local
standard for competitive bidding is greater than $100,000
2. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
A. National Environmental Policy Act: .
The City of Auburn retains environmental review responsibility for purposes of fulfilling
requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act as implemented by HUD
Environmental Review Procedures (24 CFR Part 58). The City of Auburn may require the The
City of Kent to furnish data, information and assistance for the City's review and assessment in
determining whether an Environmental Impact Statement must be prepared
B Other Federal Environmental Laws.
In decision making and action pursuant to NEPA, and otherwise under this Agreement the
standards, policies, and regulations of the following laws and authorities shall be followed The
National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (16 U.S C 470 et seq ) as amended,particularly
section 106 (16 U.S.0 470(f)), Executive Order 11593, Protection and Enhancement of the
Cultural Environment, May 13, 1971 (36 FR 8921 et seq.), particularly section 2(c),The
Reservoir Salvage Act of 1960 (16 U S.C. 469 et seq),particularly section 3 (16 U S.C. 469a-
1), as amended by the Archaeological and Historic Preservation Act of 1974; Flood Disaster
Protection Act of 1973 (42 U S C. 4001 et seq.) as amended, particularly sections 102(a) and
202(a) (42 U.S C 4012a(a) and 4106(a)); Executive Order 11988, Floodplain Management,
May 24, 1977 (42 FR 26951 et seq ), particularly section 2(a), Executive Order 11990,
Protection of Wetlands, May 24, 1977 (42 FR 26961 et seq.),particularly sections 2 and 5; The
Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 (16 U S C. 1451 et seq) as amended, particularly
section 307(c) and (d) (16 U S C 1456(c) and (d)), The Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974 (42
U.S.C. 201, 300(f) et seq., and 21 U S C. 349) as amended,particularly section 1424(e) (42
U.S.0 300h-303(e)), The Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U S C. 1531 et seq) as
amended,particularly Section 7 (16 U S C. 1536); The Wild and Scenic Rivers Act of 1968 (16
U S C 1271 et seq) as amended, particularly section 7(b) and (c) (16 U S C. 1278(b) and (c)),
The Clean Air Act(42 U.S C 7401 et seq)as amended,particularly section 176(c)and (d) (42
U S C. 7506(c) and(d)); and HUD environmental standards (24 CFR Part 51, Environmental
Criteria and Standards (44 FR 40860-40866, July 12, 1979)
C State Environmental Policy Act:
Agencies which are branches of government under RCW 43 21C.030 retain responsibility for
fulfilling the requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act, RCW chap. 43 21C, and
regulations and ordinances adopted thereunder If the The City of Kent is not a branch of
government under RCW 43.21 C 030, The City of Auburn may require the The City of Kent to
furnish data, information and assistance as necessary to enable The City of Auburn to comply
with the State Environmental Policy Act.
D. Satisfaction of Environmental Requirements
Project execution under this Agreement by either The City of Auburn or the The City of Kent
shall not proceed until satisfaction of all applicable requirements of the National and State
Environmental Policy Acts A written notice to proceed will not be issued by The City of
Auburn until all such requirements are complied with.
3. NONDISCRIMINATION:
A. General-
The The City of Kent shall comply with all Federal, State and local laws prohibiting
discrimination on the basis of age, sex, mantal status, race, creed, color, national origin or the
presence of any sensory, mental or physical handicap. These requirements are specified in
RCW chapter 49.60, Section 109 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974,
Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title VI, Civil Rights Act of 1968, Title VM, Executive Order 11063,
Executive Order 11246; Section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968, Section
504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and, the Age Discrimination Act of 1975. Specifically,
the The City of Kent is prohibited from taking any discriminatory actions defined in the HUD
Regulations at 24 CFR 570 602 (b) (1) and shall take such affirmative and corrective actions as
are required by the Regulations at 24 CFR 570 602 (b)(4).
B. Specific Discriminatory Actions Prolubited-
1 The The City of Kent may not, under any program or activity to which this Agreement may
apply, directly or through contractual or other arrangements, on the grounds of race, color,
national ongm, or sex:
(1) Deny any person facilities, services, financial aid or other benefits provided under
the program or activity
(ii) Provide any person with facilities, services, financial aid or other benefits which are
different, or are provided in a different form from that provided to others under the
program or activity
(ili) Subject any person to segregated or separate treatment in any facility or in any
matter or process related to receipt of any service or benefit under the program or
activity
(iv) Restrict in any way access to, or in the enjoyment of, any advantage or privilege
enjoyed by others in connection with facilities, services, financial aid or other
benefits under the program or activity
(v) Treat any person differently from others in determning whether the person satisfies
any admission, enrollment, eligibility, membership, or other requirement or
condition which individuals must meet in order to be provided any facilities,
services or other benefit provided under the program or activity.
(vi) Deny any person any opportunity to participate in a program or activity as an
employee.
2. The The City of Kent shall not utilize criteria or methods of administration which have the
effect of subjecting individuals to discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin,
or sex, or have the effect of defeating or substantially impairing accomplishment of the
objectives of the program or activity with respect to individuals of a particular race, color,
national origin, or sex.
3 The The City of Kent , in determining the site or location of housing or facilities provided
in whole or in part with funds under this part, may not make selections of such site or
location which have the effect of excluding individuals from, denying them the benefits of,
or subjecting them to discrimination on the grounds of race, color, national origin, or sex, or
which have the purpose or effect of defeating or substantially impairing the accomplishment
of the objectives of the Act or of the HUD Regulations
C. Farr Housing.
The The City of Kent shall take necessary and appropriate actions to prevent discrimination in
Federally assisted housing and lending practices related to loans insured or guaranteed by the
Federal government. (Civil Rights Act of 1968, Title VII; Executive Order 11063).
D. Employment:
1. In all solicitations under this Agreement, the The City of Kent shall state that all qualified
applicants will be considered for employment. The words "equal opportunity employer" in
advertisements shall constitute compliance with this section.
2. The The City of Kent shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for
employment in connection with this Agreement because of age, sex, marital status, race,
creed, color, national origin, or the presence of any sensory,mental, or physical handicap,
except when there is a bona fide occupational limitation. Such action shall include, but not
be limited to, the following employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer, recruitment or
recruitment advertising, layoff or termination, rates of pay or other forms of compensation,
and selection for training. (RCW chap. 49 60; Executive Order 11246 as amended).
3. To the greatest extent feasible, the The City of Kent shall provide training and employment
opportunities for lower income residents within the area served by CDBG assisted projects
(Section 3, Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968, as amended)
E Contractors and Suppliers
1. No contractor, subcontractor, union or vendor engaged in any activity under this Agreement
shall discriminate in the sale of materials, equipment or labor on the basis of age, sex,
marital status, race, creed, color, national origin, or the presence of any sensory,mental, or
physical handicap Such practices include: employment, upgrading, demotion, recruiting,
transfer, layoff, termination, pay rate, and advertisement for employment (RCW chap
49.60; Executive Order 11246 as amended)
2. All firms and organizations described above shall be required to submit to the The City of
Kent certificates of compliance demonstrating that they have, in fact, complied with the
foregoing provisions, provided, that certificates of compliance shall not be required from
firms and organizations with fewer than 25 employees or on contracts and/or yearly sales of
less than $10,000.
3. To the greatest extent feasible, the The City of Kent shall purchase supplies and services
for activities under this Agreement from vendors and contractors whose businesses are
located in the area served by CDBG funded activities or owned in substantial part by project
area residents (Section 3, Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968, as amended)
4. CDBG funds shall not be used directly or indirectly to employ, award contracts to, or
otherwise engage the services of, or fund any contractor or subrecipient dunng any period of
debarment, suspension, or placement in ineligibility status under the provisions of 24 CFR
Part 24.
F. Notice:
1. The The City of Kent shall include the provisions of the appropriate subsections A, B, C,
D, and E of this section 3 entitled "Nondiscrimination" in every contract or purchase order
for goods and services under this Agreement and shall send to each labor union or
representative of workers with which it has a collective bargaining agreement or other
contract or understanding a notice advising the said labor union or worker's representative
of the commitments made in these subsections.
2. In advertising for employees, goods or services for the activities under this Agreement, the
The City of Kent shall comply with Attachment O to OMB Circular A-102 or A-110, as
applicable, Procurement Standards,paragraph 9, Contracting with Small and Mmonty
Firms, Women's Business Enterprise and Labor Surplus Area firms Agencies shall be
considered to be in compliance with this provision if at least one of the following steps is
taken- (a) advertise in a minority publication in addition to publication of general
circulation, (b) utilize a minority contractors bidding center, and (c) utilize the King County
Affirmative Action Office Certified Mmonty/Women's Business Enterprise Directory.
4. LABOR STANDARDS:
The The City of Kent shall require that project construction contractors and subcontractors pay
their laborers and mechanics at wage rates in accordance with the Davis-Bacon Act,as
amended (40 U S C sections 276(a)-276(a)(5)), and that they comply with the Copeland "Anti-
Kickback" Act (40 U S C 276(c)) and the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act(40
U S C. 327 et seq) as prescribed at 29 CFR Parts 1,3,5,6 and 7,provided that this section shall
not apply to rehabilitation of residential property designed for residential use by fewer than
eight families.
5. PROPERTY MANAGEMENT:
A The The City of Kent agrees that any non-expendable personal property(capital equipment),
purchased wholly or in part with project funds at a cost of$300 (three hundred dollars)or more
per item, is upon its purchase or receipt the property of The City of Auburn and/or Federal
government.Final ownership and disposition of such property shall be determined under the
applicable provisions of Attachment N to the U S Office of Management and Budget Circular
No. A-102, and/or Attachment N to the US Office of Management and Budget Circular No A-
110.
B The The City of Kent shall be responsible for all such property, including its care and
maintenance at the The City of Kent 's expense
C. The The City of Kent shall admit the City's property management officer to The City of Kent 's
premises for the purpose of marking such property, as appropriate, with City property tags
D. The The City of Kent shall meet the following procedural requirements for all such property
1. Property records shall be maintained accurately and provide for a description ofthe
property;manufacturer's serial number or other identification number; acquisition date and
cost; source of the property; percentage of CDBG funds used in the purchase of property;
and location, use, and condition of the property.
2 A physical inventory of property shall be taken and the results reconciled with the property
records at least once every two (2) years to verify the existence, current utilization, and
continued need for the property.
3. A control system shall be in effect to insure adequate safeguards to prevent loss, damage, or
theft of the property Any such loss, damage or theft of property shall be investigated and
fully documented.
4. Adequate maintenance procedures shall be implemented to keep the property in good
condition
6. ACQUISITION AND RELOCATION:
A Any acquisition of real property by a State The City of Kent for any activity assisted under this
Agreement shall comply with the Federal Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property
Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (hereinafter referred to as the Uniform Act) (42 U.S C 4601
et seq.) and the Regulations at 24 CFR Part 42.
B. Implementation of any project provided for in this Agreement will be undertaken so as to
minimize involuntary displacement of persons,businesses, nonprofit organizations,or farms to
the greatest extent feasible.
C Any displacement of persons, businesses, nonprofit organizations, or farms occurring as the
result of acquisition of real property assisted under this Agreement shall comply with the
Uniform Act, the Regulations at 24 CFR Part 42, and The City of Auburn of Auburn's
Displacement Policy required by Federal CDBG regulations at 24 CFR 570.305. The The City
of Kent shall comply with the Regulations pertaining to costs of relocation and written
policies, as specified by 24 CFR 570 602 (c) and (d)
7. NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE:
To the extent indicated by 24 CFR 570 605, the The City of Kent shall comply with the flood
insurance purchase requirements of Section 202(a) of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of
1973 (42 U S.C. 4001 et seq and the Federal regulations issued thereunder) The The City of
Kent shall comply with the Regulations at 24 CFR section 570 605
8. LEAD-BASED PAINT POISONING:
The The City of Kent shall comply with the HUD Lead-Based Paint Regulations (24 CFR Part
35) issued pursuant to the Lead-Based Paint Poisoning Prevention Act(42 U S C. sections 4831
et sea) requiring prohibition of the use of lead-based paint (whenever funds under this
Agreement are used directly or indirectly for constriction, rehabilitation, or modernization of
residential structures) and notification of the hazards of lead-based paint poisoning to
purchasers and tenants of residential structures constructed prior to 1950.
9. ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS AND COST PRINCIPLES:
A If the The City of Kent is a governmental entity, the The City of Kent shall comply with the
requirements and standards of OMB Circular A-128, "Audits of State and Local Government,"
and Circular A-87, "Principles for Determining Costs Applicable to Grants and Contracts with
State, Local and Federally recognized Indian Tribal Governments," and with the following
Attachments to OMB Circular No. A-102:
1 Attachment A, "Cash Depositories," except for Paragraph 4 concerning deposit insurance,
2. Attachment B, "Bonding and Insurance,"
3 Attachment C, "Retention and Custodial Requirements for Records,"
4 Attachment G, "Standards for Grantee Financial Management Systems,"
5 Attachment I, "Monitoring and Reporting Program Performance,"Paragraph 2;
6 Attachment J, "Grant Payment Requirements;"
7 Attachment N, "Property Management Standards," except for Paragraph 3 concerning the
standards for real property,
8. Attachment 0, 'Procurement Standards," and
9. Attachment P, "Audit Requirements."
B If the The City of Kent is not a governmental entity, the The City of Kent shall comply with
the requirements and standards of OMB Circular No A-133, "Audits of Institutions of Higher
Learning and Other Non-Profit Institutions," and No A-122, "Cost Principles for Non-Profit
Organizations," and the following Attachments to OMB Circular No. A-110.
1. Attachment A, "Cash Depositories," except for Paragraph 4 concerning deposit insurance,
2 Attachment B, 'Bonding and Insurance;"
3 Attachment C, "Retention and Custodial Requirements for Records,"
4 Attachment H, "Monitoring and Reporting Program Performance,"Paragraph 2,
5. Attachment N, 'Property Management Standards," except for Paragraph 3 concerning the
standards for real property; and
6. Attachment 0, "Procurement Standards."
10. OTHER FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS:
The absence of mention in this Agreement of any other Federal requirements which apply to the
award and expenditure of the Federal funds made available by this Agreement is not intended to
indicate that those Federal requirements are not applicable to The City of Kent activities The
The City of Kent shall comply with all other Federal requirements relating to the expenditure
of Federal funds, including but not limited to. The Architectural Barriers Act of 1968 (42
U S C 4151), and the Hatch Act (5 U S C Chapter 15) Additionally, the The City of Kent
shall comply with the Federal requirements described by 24 CFR Part 570, Sections 600
through 603, Section 605, and Sections 607 through 612.
11. NONSUBSTITUTION FOR LOCAL FUNDING:
The CDBG funding made available under this Agreement shall not be utilized by the The City
of Kent to reduce substantially the amount of local financial support for community
development activities below the level of such support prior to the availability of funds under
this Agreement.
12. PUBLIC OWNERSHIP:
For Agencies which are not municipal corporations organized under the laws of the State of
Washington,it may become necessary to grant The City of Auburn a property interest where the
subject project calls for the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation, or
installation of publicly owned facilities and improvements The The City of Kent shall comply
with current City requirements regarding transfer of a property interest sufficient to meet any
public ownership requirement imposed by law
13. PUBLIC INFORMATION:
A In all news releases and other public notices related to projects funded under this Agreement,
the The City of Kent shall include information identifying the source of funds as The City of
Auburn of Auburn CDBG Program.
B. For all construction projects the The City of Kent shall erect a sign to City specifications at the
construction site, identifying the source of funds, except that this requirement maybe waived
for construction projects of$100,000 or less.
C The The City of Kent acknowledges that this Agreement and any other information provided
by it to The City of Auburn and/or relevant to the Project(s) described in the Exhibit(s) and
Attachment(s) are subject to the Washington State Public Disclosure Act, Chapter 42.17 RCW
14. LOBBYING:
The The City of Kent certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that.
A. No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the
undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of
any The City of Kent , a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an
employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract,
the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any
cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification
of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.
B. If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person
for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any The City of Kent , a
Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of
Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the
undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, 'Disclosure Form to Report
Lobbying,' in accordance with its instructions
C The The City of Kent shall require that the language of this certification, or equivalent
language, be included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers(including
subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that
all subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly.
This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this
transaction was made or entered into Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for
making or entering into this transaction imposed by section 1352, title 31, U S Code Any
person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less
than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure
15. RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATIONS:
The The City of Kent will comply with all federal requirements concerning religious
organizations and the use of Community Development Block Grant funds All services
delivered must be dispensed in a clearly non-sectarian manner, devoid of any religious
influence.
PART III. EVALUATION AND RECORD KEEPING:
1. GENERAL:
The The City of Kent agrees to maintain records and provide reports as listed in the Exhibits to
this Contract, and as defined in 24 CFR 570 506.
2. EVALUATION:
The The City of Kent agrees to participate with The City of Auburn in any evaluation project
or performance report, as designed by The City of Auburn or the appropriate Federal The City
of Kent , and to make available all information required by any such evaluation process
3. AUDITS AND INSPECTIONS:
The records and documents with respect to all matters covered by this Agreement shall be
subject at all times to inspection, review or audit by the City,Federal or State officials so
authorized by law during the performance of this Agreement and during the period of retention
specified in this Part III
A. Audits:
The The City of Kent will provide at or before the contract signing a copy of the The City of
Kent 's most recent audit. The The City of Kent will provide to The City of Auburn a copy of
the The City of Kent 's most recent audit for each year in which a contract for the use of funds
exists with the City Failure to provide such audit will be considered a material breach of the
contract and result in a refund to The City of Auburn of all moneys paid or due under the
contract.
B Audit Requirements-
Agencies receiving $300,000 or more in federal fiends will provide to The City of Auburn the
above required audits conducted in a manner pursuant to OMB Circular A-133.
4. RECORDS:
All Agencies receiving Community Development Block Grant funds from The City of Auburn
shall maintain a certified public audit for The City of Auburn Community Development Block
Grant year in which the funds are awarded and through each Community Development Block
Grant year or portion thereof, in which the funds are used or a contract exists between the The
City of Kent and the City As required by HUD Regulations, 24 CFR Part 570, the The City of
Kent shall compile and maintain the following records-
A Financial Management-
Such records shall identify adequately the source and application of funds for activities within
this Agreement, in accordance with the applicable provisions of Attachment G to the U.S.
Office of Management and Budget Circular A-110 These records shall contain infonnation
pertaining to grant awards and authorizations, obligations, unobligated balances, assets,
liabilities, outlays, and income
B. Relocation:
The City of Kent record keeping must comply with the Uniform Act implementing regulations
at 24 CFR Part 42. Indication of the overall status of the relocation workload and a separate
relocation record for each person, business, organization, and farm operation displaced or in the
relocation workload must be kept.
C. Property Acquisition:
The City of Kent files must contain a separate acquisition file for each acquisition process
documenting compliance with the implementing regulations for the Uniform Act at 24 CFR
Part 42. Major requirements include: (a) invitation to owner to accompany appraiser during
inspection, (b) at least one property appraisal, (c) statement of basis for determination of just
compensation, (d) written offer ofjust compensation, (e) all documents involving conveyance,
(f) settlement cost reporting statement, and (g)notice to surrender possession of premises.
D. Equal Opportunity
The The City of Kent shall maintain racial, ethnic, and gender data showing the extent to
which these categories of persons have participated in, or benefited from, the activities Gamed
out under this Agreement. The The City of Kent shall also maintain data which records its
affirmative action in equal opportunity employment, and its good-faith efforts to identify,train,
and/or hire lower-income residents of the project area and to utilize business concerns which
are located in or owned in substantial part by persons residing in the area of the project
E. Labor Standards:
Records shall be maintained regarding compliance of all contractors performing construction
work under this Agreement with the labor standards made applicable by 24 CFR 270 603 and
any State labor standards, as applicable.
F. Miscellaneous Records:
The The City of Kent shall maintain such other records for each separate CDBG-funded project
as may be required by HUD or the City, including but not limited to:.
1. Original Funding Application
2. Grant Award Letter.
3. Notice to Proceed and/or equivalent written approval from City.
4. Project or program related authorizations, motions, resolutions or meeting minutes of the
The City of Kent 's governing body.
5 Contract Attachments, Exhibits and any amendments thereto.
6 This Agreement and any amendments thereto.
7. Voucher reimbursement requests and program accomplishment forms.
8. Bills for payment.
9. Approved vouchers and warrants
10 Where CDBG funds will support The City of Kent staff salary and/or fringe benefit costs,
payroll time sheets signed by the employee and the employee's supervisor, annotated to
document percent of time charged against the project if less than full time.
11 Where CDBG funds will be used to offset the cost of communications,travel and office
supplies, and where these costs are shared with other programs and no invoice is available,
documentation such as log sheets (for copy machine use, odometer readings, etc) As an
alternative, annotated invoices may be used to document charges as appropriate
12. In capital projects where CDBG funds will be used to hire physical laborers and/or
tradespeople (regardless of Davis-Bacon applicability to the project),hours that these
employees worked, and their rate of pay per hour.
5. RETENTION OF RECORDS:
Required records shall be retained for a period of three (3) years after termination of this
Agreement, except as follows: (1)Records that are the subject of audit findings shall be
retained for three (3) years after such findings have been resolved (2)Records for
nonexpendable property shall be retained for three (3) years after its final disposition
Nonexpendable property is defined in Attachment N to U.S. Office of Management and Budget
Circular No A-102, for governmental entities, and Circular No. A-110 for non-governmental
organizations.
6. REPORTS
The The City of Kent shall submit such reports as required by The City of Auburn at such
times as required by the City Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement to the
contrary, the reports required by The City of Auburn shall be submitted by the The City of Kent
no less than on an annual basis Such reports shall also be submitted prior to project
completion.
PART IV. EXHIBITS
The following exhibits are incorporated herein by reference
A Original Grant Application as submitted May 2, 2002.
B Environmental Determination
C. Contract Scope of Work, Completion Date, and Contact Information
PART V. ACCEPTANCE AND SIGNATURES:
The parties hereto agree and accept the terms, conditions, covenants and all matters and laws
incorporated by reference herein and therefore cause their hands to affix their signatures as evidence to
their acceptance of this Agreement before their designated witnesses and/or notaries
CITY OF AUBURN
MAYOR
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM-
Danielle Daskam, Daniel B Heid,
City Clerk City Attorney
CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON
TITLE-
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
)ss
COUNTY OF KING }
On this day of 2003 before me,the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of
Washington,personally appeared ,to me]mown to be
the of The City of Kent,Washington,municipality referenced within the
foregoing instrument,and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of sadCity for the uses
and purposes therein mentioned,and on oath stated that he/she is authorized to execute said instrument on behalf of said
City
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the date heremabove set forth
NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State
of Washington, residing in
MY COMMISSION expires:
EXH]B]T#1
Community Development Block Grant Contract
General Information
PROJECT NO. BG 0306
TIFLE: City of Auburn Housing Repair Program
PROJECT SUMMARY. Loans and grants for repair of low income,owner-occupied, single
family homes
ELIGIBILITY. 24CFR 570.202—Low/Mod Limited Clientele
NATIONAL OBJECTIVE- Low/Moderate Income Housing
CDBG APPROPRIATION • $136,500
TYPE OF PROJECT. Capital
PROJECT LOCATION City-wide
SPECIAL CONDITIONS See EXHIBIT#3 Special Conditions
TERMINATION DATE. December 31, 2003
CONTACT PERSON- K atherm Johnson
TITLE Human Services Manager
MAILING ADDRESS 220 4`"Ave S ,Kent.WA 98032
PHONE NUMBER 253-856-5070
FAX NUMBER 253-856-6070
PERSON(S)AUTHORIZED TO SIGN VOUCHER REIMBURSEMENT REQUEST AND PROGRAM
ACCOMPLISHMENTS FORM
NAME/TITLE Katherm Johnson, Human Services Manager
SIGNATURE
(optional)NAME/TITLE John Hodgson,Parks, Recreation and Community Service Director
SIGNATURE
i
EXHIBIT#2
Community Development Block Grant Contract
Project Budget
PROJECT NO : BG 0306 TITLE- City of Auburn Housing Repair
SUMMARY OF TASKS AND COSTS
PERSONNEL COSTS
Annual Percent of
List Employees by Position Title Salary Time to Item Total
Project
Home Repair Supervisor 57,408 20% 11,482
Home Repair Specialist 41,760 70% 29,232
Home Repair Specialist 45,984 20% 9,197
Home Repair Worker 39,672 10% 3,967
0 0
Fringe Benefits(taxes, benefits) 17,568 17,568
0 0
0 0
Category Total
(Should be the same as No. I in
Budget Detail)l 202,392 71,446
(continued)
EXHI BIT#2(CONTINUED)
Community Development Block Grant Contract
Project Budget
BUDGET DETAIL
Column A Column B Column C
Cost Categories Total Budget CDBG Other Non-
Item Funds CDBG Funds
— Personnel Costs 71,446 71,446
— Office/Operating Supplies 15,074 15,074
Consultant or Purchased Services 0 0
Construction Contracts/Real 38,000 38,000
Property Acquisition
Communications and 400 400
Advertisements
-- Travel and/or Training 0 0
-- Intra-Agency Support {I a 15,000 15,000
adtmmstrative overhead
Capital Outlay-Construction 0 0
Other(Detail)(Vehicle Rental) 10,080 10,080
Total Project Costs
{Note : Column A must equal sum 150,000 150,000 -0-
of Column B and C
Column A Column B Column C
Source of Funds Total City of Auburn Other Sources
City of Auburn CDBG Funds 150,000 150,000
City of Auburn General Funds
Other Funds:
Grand Total
{Note : Column A must equal sum 150,000 150,000
of Column B and C
EXHIBIT#3
Community Development Block Grant Contract
Special Conditions BG#0306
1 Ordinance #5698 In accordance with the legislative intent of the City Council as expressed in CDBG
Budget Ordinance#5698, the Agency must-
[Provide] Grants of less than$4,000 for necessary repairs and renovation of single family homes owned
and occupied by low and moderate income households at vanous locations throughout Auburn as follows
(a) City of Auburn Responsibilities
The Department of Planning and Community Development Department of the City of Auburn shall be
responsible for the following project-related activities
• program publicity
maintenance of program regulations, including income eligibility standards
provision and updating of program application form(s)
client intake and eligibility determination
flood plain and insurance requirements, if any
• maintenance of individual client files which include application,proof of income and ownership,
and notification of completion of work,processing and recording of any necessary loan documents
(b) City of Kent Responsibilities-
City of Kent staff shall be responsible for the following project-related activities.
construction need assessment
• work orders
contractor bid documents and bid process, if necessary
hiring and payment of contractors
liaison between client and contractors
inspection upon completion of work
(c) Payments, Reimbursement
City of Kent Staff are responsible for all payment of contractors
• City of Kent shall submit a monthly reimbursement request to the City of Auburn, and shall include
with that request a statement of projects completed,projects in progress, amount of grant spent in
billing period,total amount spent to date, and amount of grant remaining
2. Timely Proeression of Protect The Agency agrees that it will complete the above project in a timely
marmer, and comply with the time line as set forth m Exhibit#5, Project Time Line.
3. Limitations on Expenditures and Adjustments- In the event that the City receives less CDBG revenues than
originally estimated in the CDBG budget ordinance,the Agency will receive a proportionately equal
reduction in its appropriation relative to the total decrease in total CDBG revenues. The amount of CDBG
funds available to the Agency is stipulated in the"Notice of Grant Award." If the amount CDBG funds
available to the Agency is less than appropriated, then the City will notify the Agency in writing when
additional CDBG funds become available
4. Termination of the Contract This Agreement between the CITY OF AUBURN and the CITY OF KENT
shall terminate on December 31, 2003 In accordance with the terms of the Agreement, all unspent CDBG
funds at the time of termination shall lapse and return to the City of Auburn's CDBG fund
5 Public Information. The stipulations of Section 13(B) of the Agreement regarding the placement of sign(s)
identifying the source of funds is hereby waived
EXHIBIT#4
Reporting Requirements and Recordkeeping- BG#0306
1 Reimbursement Schedule
(a) The Agency must submit a request for reimbursement at least once a quarter and may submit such a
request on a monthly basis,beginning with the date of this Agreement, and applicable to all costs
incurred toward this grant beginning January 1, 2003
(b) Failure to submit a quarterly request for reimbursement in accordance with Part 1, Section 5 of this
Agreement may cause the City to consider the Project abandoned and the CDBG funds made available
for re-appropriation Continued failure to request reimbursement and submit required performance
reports will cause the City to take corrective action as it deems necessary
(c) The City shall reimburse the Agency for its expenses incurred implementing this Agreement within the
forty-five (45)days following the receipt of a Voucher Reimbursement Request.
2. Required Contents of Reimbursement Request
(a) Reimbursement Cover Sheet as supplied, showing Agency name, address, contact information, and
budget information,
(b) Accomplishments data sheet as supplied for the Agency, showing how the Agency has progressed
toward its goals as set forth in Exhibit#5
(c) Failure to properly submit a reimbursement request, through the omission of the above-required items
or through material omissions within those documents,will cause the request to be returned to the
Agency and will cause a delay in the disbursement of funds
EXHIBIT#5
PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENTS
BG#0306
Part 1.Schedule by Task
Milestones Quarters
(Projected Number of Units) 1St 2nd 3rd 4`"
Loans/Grants Identified by City- Major Repairs 3 3 6 3
Loans/Grants Identified by City- Minor Repairs 100 100 100 100
Current Projects
Completed Units
(Actual Number of Units)
Loans/Grants Identified by City
Current Projects
Completed Units
Part 2 CDBG Expenditure Rate
CDBG Funds Vouchered
Projected Actual
I' Quarter (1/1 —3/31) 34,125
2"d Quarter (4/1 —6/30) 34,125
3'd Quarter (7/1 —9/30) 34,125
4d' Quarter (10/1 — 12/31) 34,125
• Kent City Council Meeting
Date August 5, 2003
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: CENTURY 21 DONATION—ACCEPT AND AMEND BUDGET
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Accept a$1,000.00 donation from Century 21 and
amend the Glenn Nelson Park budget.
Century 21 raised $750.00 at a Home Run Derby and a silent auction of baseball
memorabilia during a softball tournament at Russell Road. Broker Jakk Roberson added
$250.00 to the process for a total donation of$1,000.00 for the rehabilitation of the
ballpark at Glenn Nelson Park.
3. EXHIBITS: Copy of check from Century 21/Allstate Properties, Inc.
. 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Staff and Parks Committee
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES X
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: Revenue of$1,000.00
SOURCE OF FUNDS: Century 21/Allstate Properties, Inc
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 6H
UO/ L❑/ LUUJ 1J. JL LJJ-OJU-I JUJ l•Ln�yl\I c1 n��..ini� � n�� vc
"CENTURY 21/ALL,STATE PRQPERTIES, I 53279
1326 S CENTRAL $52-2M
KEN7,WA 96032
10 inn 25033B8
JAY
r7HE
'.SR6E/R�rOyJF � G 1 E r5 l V Lir�s .V 1/� I.!•f7Qe �04 .I
DOLLARS
[Mbank. usbJnk wm
Fiv3h..Sr.1✓G.'.nn�Ml�
FOR Lile r Loh
11•000005"3279,12 i, 125000105,: ; 53500 ? 46 6
I
I
Kent City Council Meeting
Date August 5, 2003
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: TURNKEY PARK, FEE-IN-LIEU OF FUNDS —ACCEPT AND
AMEND BUDGET
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Accept the $7,050.00 fee-in-lieu of funds from
Dreamworks Construction and amend the Turnkey Park budget.
From April 1, 203 through June 30, 2003, the City of Kent received a total of$7,050 00
for the Norton subdivision. Dreamworks construction voluntarily paid a fee-in-lieu of
dedicating parkland to mitigate the development of single family homes. Funds will be
used for the closest park to the subdivision, Turnkey Park.
3. EXHIBITS: Revenue report
4. RECOMMENDED BY: Staff and Parks Committee
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES X
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: Revenue of$7,050.00
SOURCE OF FUNDS: Fee-m-lieu of funds from Dreamworks Construction
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 61
N aI
0
co
m
o
m
O N
m a c
a o
`o U
N
a v'�
0 3
E
ro
m
o`
n
`o
a
c
a
c
N �
w `m
N (7
J O
R1
T
d
U � �
O
u a
`m
m
m
x
0 N
a
T h
r <
u
p Y
0 0 0
0 0 0
o 0 0
o n n n
Q
`a
rn
o � �
m o
N a c
c 7
m
a w
J m
y
J
RI
d
a
E �
Z o `ono
C N
U �
QU O
O
C N
a
9
y ? to
U C a O
N
. Kent City Council Meeting
Date August 5, 2003
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: 2003 TREE EDUCATION PROGRAM DONATION—ACCEPT
AND AMEND BUDGET
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Accept the $750.00 donation from the Kent Rotary
Club and credit the Parks 2003 Tree Education Program.
This donation will assist in funding the Kent School District tree education and planting
program conducted by staff from Public Works and Parks Planning and Development.
3. EXHIBITS: Copy of check from Kent Rotary Club
4. RECOMMENDED BY: Staff and Parks Committee
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES X
6. EXPENDITURE REOUIRED: Revenue of$750.00
SOURCE OF FUNDS: Kent Rotary Club
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No 6J
'yaeg uo¢pel•O (a semi.j Fllm..s
F
CO) N
O p g o
LO O O O lO h
b O R
t R
t Q
i Z
i b
k o M
� O
� � N
e �
• a N
/
t V
k
Y R
yN t
p{� /
mWm N R
Q WDa
Q �- t •_
DE3 m i �
0 cG
U
t I.
iLna
/
« Iil V
0
i 0-
0
m
k �
/ N R
, f
t IRl a
/ � V
O 0 W
k
Q : L
Z «
0 i
LL t
133 ti ry
J 8� 1
¢ y c 0
1— e W 0
0 z al
� 41 Z
oC x3 Pr W a t d' p .a
Za)p c
YaY C aY�iCW •: R o
a U
W xQiNx Q93
O
0o 0x
�. oW w u 0
0.0 Y
• Kent City Council Meeting
Date August 5. 2003
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION APPOINTMENT—CONFIRM
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Confirm the Mayor's appointment of Ms. Cathy
Peters to serve as a member of the Kent Human Services Commission. Ms. Peters is a
Kent resident and works as Pastoral Coordinator at Holy Spirit Parish. She will replace
Pamela Roberts and her term will be in effect until 1/1/06
3. EXHIBITS: Memorandum
4. RECOMMENDED BY: Mayor White
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
6. EXPENDITURE REOUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 6K
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
Jim White, Mayor
Phone 253-856-570D
Fax 253-856-6700
Address 220 Fourth Avenue S
K E N T Kent,WA 98032-5895
WAYNINGTON
MEMORANDUM
TO MAYOR JIM WHITE
COUNCIL PRESIDENT JUDY WOODS
CITY COUNCIL MEMP
FROM JIM WHITE, MAYOR
DATE JULY 29, 2003
RE APPOINTMENT TO KENT HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION
I have appointed Ms Cathy Peters to serve as a member of the Kent Human Services
Commission Ms Peters has lived in Kent for 20 years and is recognized for her service to the
community. She is currently employed as Pastoral Coordinator at Holy Spirit Parish and came to
that position after serving for 14 years as Director of the South County Family Center She has
also been a member of the South King Council of Human Services Council since its inception in
1981,
Ms Peters will replace Pamela Roberts and her term will be in effect until l/1/06
I submit this for your confirmation
jb
RevIs
wd 7Q
Kent City Council Meeting
Date August 5, 2003
Category Other Business
1. SUBJECT: STATE ENERGY PROJECT FINANCING AGREEMENT WITH
STATE TREASURER, ORDINANCE—ADOPT
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: The proposed ordinance authorizes the acquisition of
property and execution of a financing contract with the Office of the State Treasurer,
including execution of all related documentation for energy audit capital improvements
on city buildings.
On November 19, 2002, the city entered into an agreement with Washington State
Department of General Administration to participate in a city-wide energy conservation
program. Under this agreement, the city can borrow from the State Treasury for any
recommended conservation measures, repaying the state over a ten (10) year period,
based on energy savings.
3. EXHIBITS: Draft ordinance and Dept. of General Administration loan documents
4. RECOMMENDED BY: Staff and Operations Committee
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS: State of Washington
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: nn
Councilmember a moves, Councilmember l�&4& seconds
to adopt Ordinance No. ��authorizing the acquisition of personal property and
execution of a financing contract with the Office of the State Treasurer, including
execution of all related and documentation for energy audit capital improvements on
city buildings.
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 7A
i
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City
of Kent, Washington, authorizing the acquisition of
personal property and the execution of a financing contract
with the Office of the State Treasurer and authorizing the
Mayor to execute all required documentation relating to the
acquisition of said personal property for energy audit
capital improvements on city buildings
WHEREAS, on November 19, 2002, the city council authorized the
mayor to sign all necessary documents to allow Washington Department of General
Administration to conduct an energy audit on city buildings and potentially to borrow
from the State Treasury for any recommended conservation measures, with repayment
to the state over a twelve (12)year period, based on realized energy savings, and
WHEREAS, an audit was completed that noted an extensive list of
conservation recommendations,attached and incorporated as Exhibit A, and
WHEREAS, the cost of the audit was $43,622 00, and the cost for the
proposed conservation measures including the audit is $1,285,409 00, and
• 1 Energy Audit Capital improvements
For City Buildings
WHEREAS, the City of Kent (the "Local Agency") has executed a
Notice of Intent to the Office of State Treasurer, in the form attached and incorporated
as Annex 1 (the "NOI"), in relation to the acquisition of and the financing of the
;acquisition of the personal property, under the provisions of Chapter 39 94 RCW, and
i
WHEREAS, the city has negotiated with the State Treasury to borrow
funds, making payments twice annually for twelve (12) years using the savings from
reduced energy consumption to cover the cost of the improvements, and
WHEREAS, it is deemed necessary and advisable that the city enter
into a Local Agency Financing Contract with the Office of the State Treasurer, in the
form attached and incorporated as Annex 2 (the "Financing Contract"), in an amount
not to exceed $1 2 Million, in order to acquire the property and finance the acquisition
of the property and related financing costs, and
WHEREAS, the City will undertake to acquire the personal property on .
behalf of and as agent of the Washington Finance Officers Association (the "WFOA")
pursuant to the terms of the Financial Contract, and in accordance with all applicable
purchasing statutes and regulations applicable to the City, and
WHEREAS, the City desires to appoint the individuals set forth in
Annex 3 as the City's representatives in connection with the acquisition of the
personal property and the execution of the Financing Contract (each an "Authorized
Agency Representative"), NOW THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON
DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS.
2 Energy Audit Capital Improvements
For City Buildings
SECTION L The individuals holding the offices or positions set forth
!in Annex 3 are each hereby appointed as representatives of the Local Agency in
iconnection wit the acquisition of the identified personal property and the execution of
I
the Financing Contract and all other related documents A minimum of one (1)
Authorized Agency Representatives shall be required to execute any one (1) document
in order for it to be considered duly elected on behalf of the Local Agency
SECTION 2. The form of the Financing Contract attached as Exhibit
C is approved, and the Authorized Agency Representatives are authorized and directed
to execute and deliver the Financing Contract, in an amount not to exceed
51,285,40900 and in substantially the form attached with those changes as may be
approved by the Authorized Agency Representatives for the acquisition the personal
property and for the financing of the acquisition of the property and related financing i
costs
i
SECTION 3. The City authorizes the acquisition of the property as
agent of the WFOA in accordance with the terms and provisions of the Financing
Contract
i
SECTION 4. The Authorized Agency Representatives are authorized
to execute and deliver to the Office of the State Treasurer all other documents,
agreements, and certificates, and to take all other action that any of them deem
necessary or appropriate in connection with the financing of the property, including,
but not limited to, any amendment to the NOI and any agreements relating to initial
,and ongoing disclosure in connection with the offering of securities related to the
financing
SECTION 5. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, or
phrase of this ordinance is declared unconstitutional or invalid for any reason, such
decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance
3 Energy Audit Capital Improvements
For City Buildings
SECTION 6. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the
effective date of this ordinance is hereby ratified and affirmed.
SECTION 7. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty
(30) days from and after its passage as provided by law
JIM WHITE, MAYOR
ATTEST:
BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM
TOM BRUBAKER, CITY ATTORNEY
PASSED day of August, 2003
APPROVED day of August, 2003
PUBLISHED: day of August, 2003
I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No
passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, and approved by the
Mayor of the City of Kent as hereon indicated
(SEAL)
BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK
I�K'vilWNnwiccEnnyyAudnCapiullmprovemrncs Erc
4 Energy Audit Capital Improvements
For City Buildings
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF KENT
CONSERVATION MEASURES
RECOMMENDATIONS
A. PRO jECT DESCRIPTION
The project consists of retrofit and replacement of various mechanical, controls
and lighting systems at The City of Kent.
This project addresses the need to replace faded equipment in the City Hall and
Commons,while also switching to gas heat for much of the year Control
improvements will be performed to save energy and improve comfort in various
buildings Lighting systems in the majority of the City buildings will be retrofit or
replaced, saving energy and improving light levels,visibility, and color rendering
Below is a list of the measures to be installed.
f Mechanical Systems
City Hall
Replace chillers with water-cooled chillers and cooling tower, install CO2 sensors,
rebalance HVAC system, commission
Install new boiler and pre-heat coils in the air handlers
Centennial Center
Commission HVAC system
Upgrade energy management system (EMS)to graphics based system
Add barometric damper to exhaust fan, control WIC exhaust fans on EMS
Kent Commons
Add HW boiler, convert FCU's to 2-pipe system
Install CO2 sensors to control outside air for gyms and meeting areas
Add mechanical cooling to gym
Commission HVAC system, check controls for gym AHU's and chilled water
pumps
Install occupancy sensors in gym and meeting areas
City Hail Annex
Add budding to EMS network
Replace air handlers with new units using outside air economizers
Install EMS controls, economizer, occupancy and CO2 sensors, commission
system
Senior Center
Commission HVAC System
Kent Historical Society Museum
Install DDC Thermostat
Commission HVAC System
Riverbend 18-Hole Golf Course
Replace electric heat with hot water coil for FC-5
Commission HVAC System
Electrically Sub meter Restaurant area
GC-M6 Install occupancy sensors to reduce electric heat in W/C
GC-M7 Block off breezeway opening
Fire Station#71
Add door switches to EMS
Upgrade space sensors for Co-Ray-Vac systems in all stations
Fire Station#73
Add (2)two gas domestic hot water heaters (keep electric as back-up)
Fire Station#74
Add gas domestic hot water heaters (keep electric as back-up)
2. Lighting Systems
Retrofit and replace existing lighting systems-City Hall, Centennial Center,
Kent Commons, City Hail Annex, Resource Center, Senior Center, Riverbend 18-
Hole Golf Course and Restaurant, Fire Station #71, Fire Station #72, Fire Station
#73, Fire Station #74, Fire Station#75, Fire Station#76, Corrections Building,
Municipal Parking Lot, Police Building and Gowe Street Station
� |!
k E 0 13 k ��
/ k fo ,OR
1R E
& | ! aR ■
! 'o |
!§« s E
«| !
a � , !|�.|■ | !! y | � �
$
;I11 - 1 § E - ' ! § n ■
. i . .... . . . . . . . .
� | \ a §\ �� °§ ■$ . s ; � ; 72 ! |} ��
• � # $ ■ , §� i2a2ale ■ 2 � i , � -
.
� (
SL
% i ■ 2 - _
,
/
$
! �
!
�■
)�
k •� �� � � $
! }
� / {{{| I !# !
� k E� � �E| �Ik �� !\ ■
(YL Kk� ƒ/ }k
) °K
. . $ . . . . . . .
' §■
�I
|| _
§ - -- - -- | §
)§$) % £■
§ ' 54
$ k k§/k ! j�
| ■ , \ ;( \ "' k, .:
■ % � k §!! > §* �
\| 2 7 zi
:§
� � k$}) k «■
| -
_�
� $ ƒ
` � " | | EEE ■ ! (
z � ! | � ! ■
I
6 ;
� $ i .
| |
"go
� Et
, . . . . . . .
a . . . . . . .
, . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
f
! - - - - - - -
� s . . . . . . .
0
k
E
3 Q
e � 943 3
Y a a c
p N N +
O m Z 2 2
L y C G G
3 < x N +
0
0
m � m
o = o
F
of 2 p
a c
M M N N N M M M
P T
Y i
9 N N M N N N M M M ^ D
m
Y N
� N
w w « x « M
a
N m
M M M N M M M M M
M
T
T
N M M N M x M M N
N
T
M N M N p • x M M
F m
T
e
S
N M N M M Y M M N
o M M M M M M N N N
�s
N N M N M M N p N
b
m
S
0 U « > 6 N )yt m
M M Mg N N
yM M Nq M M M � qMM
m
w m �
T u xu y
J A
S
N tl
� N
M
N
T
Q�
Y
s
b
S
i
b
a
ag
add
gi
O .-• W O O W +�
0 N V V J
w � » O VV P d r • P O
0 N N«N N N N « p N
3 J N N O N
� � P
J
S V _ �V1' r r IJ yr1 J 0
.y N N T ' tmi• 41 J
N M M N N M p N M
j 6 N
V p J N N V
N N N p N M M M M M N
M M M M N N M N N
i
Y P P P N J m
0
N M M N M N M N N
pi 1p N
Y O YI N p O
Yy 'e m J p o
Y O W P
N M N M M p M N
i p y
ffi ti :J o�
C N • • 0 r • V W N
OI OI T
J
Y
� D
v Y m
r
P � m
Y N
� N
P
p
S
E
i
A
L
E
a
N�
8g
ANNEX 1
CITY OF KENT
NOTICE OF INTENT
Notice of intent Annex i to
State of Washington LOCAL(Local Option Capital Asset Lending) Authorizing Resolution
Exhibit A to
Local Government Information Financing Contract
County King
Legal Name:_City of Kent_ MCAG No 0401
Contact Pei son- Charles Lindsey Title Superintendent of Facilities
Address 220 Fourth.Ave South, Kent WA 98032-5895
Phone (253) 856-5081 Fax (253)856-6080 E-mail clindsev(abci kent wa us
Would you prefer to receive financing documents(check one), ®Already have financing documents
❑ MS Word 6 0 by e-mail ❑3 5"disk—Word 97 by U S mail []Hard copy by U S mail
Property (Real Estate or Equipment)
Property description(include quantity,if applicable) Energy Conservation -Lighting upgrades in all City
buildings, HVAC at Resource Center Chiller&Boilers in City Hall,A/C for Kent Commons gym and reader board
sign at Kent Commons
Total cost $1,285,409 Maximum amount to finance $1,285,409
Finance term- 12 years Useful life 10 years Desired financing date 9/15/03
Purpose of property(Please be s e� cifrc and include dept of use) See Property Description above and Exhibit A to
Ordinance
If real estate,the Real Estate Worksheet ❑Is attached ❑Will be provided by(date)
If equipment, will the property purchase price be paid with ❑ program proceeds or ® general funds to be reimbursed
from program proceeds9 If general funds are to be used,include a copy of the local agency's reimbursement resolution with
the financing documents
Security Pledge
❑ Voted general obligation of local government ® Non-voted general obligation of local government
Other Information
Approximate population _ _(not required for cities and counties)
If any of the following apply,please provide a complete discussion on a separate page
❑ Yes ® No Does the local government use cash flow borrowing(registered warrants, interfund loans or other
cash flow borrowing)?
❑ Yes ® No Is the local government a party to significant litigation?
❑ Yes ® No Is this a reimbursement? If yes,date funds spent
We are not required to submit the Credit Form because we have an existing bond rating of A or better from
Moody's and Standard &Pooes
Does local government have a bond rating? ®Yes ❑No Bond rating(s) Al
(attach rating agency letter)
By executing this Notice of Intent,the local agency acknowledges,agrees to and accepts its designation and appointment as the agent of
the nominal lessor in connection with the acquisition of the project By executing this Notice of Intent,the local agency further
acknowledges and agrees that certificate counsel and any other special counsel to the state in connection with the authorization,issuance
and delivery of the certificates and the related financing documents shall not be acting,and shall not be deemed to act,as counsel to the
local agency,nor shall any attorney-client relationship exist or be deemed to exist between such counsel and any participating local agency
in connection with such matters
Submitted by Jim White Title Mayor
Signature Date
1
ANNEX 2
CITY OF KENT
FINANCING CONTRACT
Transaction No Annex 2 to Authonnng Resolution(Equipment)
Local Agency Financing Contract,Series 200 3
(Equipment)
This Local Agency Financing Contract,Series 2003 (the"Financing Contract")is entered into by and between the state of Washington(the"State"),
doting by and through the Stale Treasurer(the"State Treasurer") and the Crtv of Kent ,a env of the State(the"Local Agency")
Recitals
WHEREAS,certain State agencies(as defined in Appendix I hereto,"State Agencies')are authorized to acquire personal properly used or needed by
such State Agencies through financing contracts entered into pursuant to Chapter 356,Laws of Washington,1989,codified as Chapter39 94 of the Revised
Code of Washington(the"RCW"),as supplemented and amended(the'Act"),and
WHEREAS,Chapter 291,Laws of Washington, 1998 supplemented and amended the Act to authonze the State to enter into financing contracts on
behalf of certain local agencies (as defined in Appendix I hereto, "Local Agencies"), including the Local Agency,to finance the acquisition of personal
property by such Local Agencies,and
WHEREAS,the State Treasurer has established a consolidated program providing for the execution and delivery of certificates of participation in such
financing contracts,or in master financing contracts with respect thereto,in series from time to time in order to provide financing or refinancing for the costs
of acquisition of such personal property by State Agencies and Local Agencies,and
WHEREAS,simultaneously with the execution and delivery hereof,the State is entering into a Master Financing Contract,Series 200-L,dated as of
the Dated Date(the"Master Financing Contract")with the Washington Finance Officers Association,a nonprofit corporation duly organized and existing
under and by virtue of the laws of the state of Washington(the"WFOA"), to provide financing for the costs of acquisition of cerium items of personal
property by certain State Agencies and Local Agencies,including the Local Agency,under the terms set forth therein,and
WHEREAS,the State Treasurer and the Local Agency have determined that it is necessary and desirable to enter into this Financing Contract to provide
financing or refinancing for the costs of acquisition of certain items of personal property, described in Exhibit B hereto (the"Property"), by the Local
Agency,and
WHEREAS,the State Finance Committee has authorized the execution and delivery of this Financing Contract pursuant to Resolution No 923 adopted
on July 17,2000,and
WHEREAS,all acts,conditions and things required by law to exist,to have happened and to have been performed precedent to and in connection with
the execution and delivery of this Financing Contract do exist, have happened and have been performed in regular and due time,form and manner as
required by law,and the Parties hereto are now duly authorized to execute,deliver and perform their respective obligations under this Financing Contract,
NOW THEREFORE,in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein and for other valuable consideration,the Parties hereto
mutually agree as follows
Section 1 I Defined Terms Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined in this Financing Contract shall have the respective meanings given
such terins in Appendix I hereto
Section 12 Notice of Intent Personal Property Certificate Certificate Destenatine Authorized Local Agency Representative The Local Agency has
delivered a Notice of Intentto the State Treasurer in the form of Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference In order to evidence its
acceptance of the Property financed and acquired pursuant hereto,the Local Agency has executed and delivered herewith,or will execute and deliver within
60 days from the Dated Date to the State Treasurer,a Personal Property Certificate in the form of Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this
reference The Local Agency has delivered a Certificate Designating Authorized Agency Representatives to the State Treasurer in the form of Exhibit C
attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Said Certificate is currently in force and has not been amended withdrawn or superseded,and the
signatures shown thereon are true and correct originals of the signatures of the persons who hold the titles shown opposite their names The signature of any
one of the individuals shown on said Certificate is sufficient to bind the Local Agency under this Financing Contract with respect to anv of the undertakings
contemplated herein The terms and provisions set forth in Appendix I1 hereto are incorporated herem and made a part hereof by this reference
Section 1 3 Installment Sale and Purchase of Property The State hereby agrees to sell,assign and convey,and does hereby sell,assign and convey to
the Local Agency,and the Local Agency hereby agrees to purchase,acquire and assume,and does hereby purchase,acquire and assume,from the State,all
of the State's right,title and interest in and to the Property and all proceeds and profits thereof and therefrom,subject to the security interest created pursuant
to Section 2 5 of Appendix 11 hereof,and the Local Agency agrees to pay in consideration thereof the Purchase Price therefor and interest thereon and the
Additional Costs in accordance with Section 14 hereof,and all other amounts required to be paid by the local Agency hereunder,all in accordance with the
provisions of this Financing Contract.
Section 1 4 Agency Installment Payments In consideration of the sale of the Property and the covenants and agreements of the State in this
Financing Contract,the Local Agency hereby promises to pay to the State the following amounts at the fallowing times (a)On each Agency Installment
Payment Date,the Agency Installment Payment set forth in Exhibit D hereto,consisting of a Principal Component and/or an Interest Component as set forth
in such Exhibit, and (b)All Additional Costs incurred by the State in connection with the sale of the Property to the Local Agency,the execution and
delivery of the Cemficates,and the observance and performance of the Series 200 3 Agreements,within thirty(30)days following receipt of an invoice
from the State with respect thereto which includes(t)a brief description of each such Additional Cost,(u)the party to whom payment is due,(in)the amount
thereof,and(iv)such additional information as[he Local Agency may reasonably request
Section 15 Term.Thu Local Agency Financing Contract shall terminate on the date on which all amounts due hereunder shall have been paid or the
payment thereof duly provided for pursuant to Section 4 1 of Appendix II hereof
STATE OF WASHINGTON
OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER as Local Agency
By By
Designated State Treasurer Representative Title
Date Date
12
Notice of Intent Annex I to
State of Washington LOCAL(Local Option Capital Asset Lending) Authorizing Resolution
Exhibit A to
Local Government Information Financing Contract
County King
Legal Name:_City of Kent MCAG No : 0401 48
Contact Person• Charles Lmds_ey__.- Title Sunenntendent of Facilities
Address- 220 Fourth Ave South,Kent WA 98032-5895
Phone: (253) 856-5091 Fax (253) 856-6080 E-mail clindseyCa�ci kent wa us
Would you prefer to receive financing documents(check one)- ®Already have financing documents
❑ MS Word 6 0 by e-mail ❑3 5"disk—Word 97 by U S mail ❑Hard copy by U S mail
Property (Real Estate or Equipment)
Property description(include quantity,if applicable): Energy Conservation-Lighting ungodes in all City
buildmes.HVAC at Resource Center.Chiller&Boilers in City Hall.A/C for Kent Commons gym and reader board
sign at Kent Commons
Total cost $1,285,409 Maximum amount to finance $1,285,409
Finance term: 12 years Useful life: 10 years Desired financing date.9/15/03
Purpose of property(Please be s eciftc and include dept.of use)- See Property Description above and Exhibit A to
Ordinance
If real estate,the Real Estate Worksheet ❑ Is attached ❑ Will be provided by(date)
If equipment, will the property purchase price be paid with ❑ program proceeds or ® general funds to be reimbursed
from program proceeds? If general funds are to be used, include a copy of the local agency's reimbursement resolution with
the financing documents
Security Pledge
❑ Voted general obligation of local government ® Non-voted general obligation of local government
Other Information
Approximate population _ _(not required for cities and counties).
If any of the following apply,please provide a complete discussion on a separate page'
❑ Yes ® No Does the local government use cash flow borrowing(registered warrants, interfund loans or other
cash flow borrowing)?
❑ Yes ® No Is the local government a party to significant lmgatioO
❑ Yes ® No Is this a reimbursement? If yes, date funds spent
We are not required to submit the Credit Form because we have an existing bond rating of A or better from
Moody's and Standard&Poor's
Does local government have a bond rating? ®Yes []No Bond rating(s) AI
(anach rating agency letter)
By executing this Notice of Intent,the local agency acknowledges,agrees to and accepts its designation and appointment is the agent of
the nominal lessor in connection with the acquisition of the project By executing this Notice of intent,the local agency further
acknowledges and agrees that certificate counsel and any other special counsel to the state in connection with the authorization,issuance
and delivery of the certificates and the related financing documents shall not be acting,and shall not be deemed to act,as counsel to the
local agency,nor shall any attorney-client relationship exist or be deemed to exist between such counsel and any participating local agen
in connection with such matters
Submitted by. Jim White Title Mayor
Signature. Date-
Exhibit B to Financing Contract(Equipment)
Personal Property Certffleate
Name of Local Agency City of Kent
Address 220 Fourth Avenue South
Kent,WA 98032-5895
All capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Financing Contract that this Exhibit B is attached
to The undersigned,[Ndme/Title]_Jim White, Mayur_dues hereby certify,that[he/she] is an Authorized Agency Representative of_the City of
Kent_(the"Local Agency")pursuant to the terms of the Financing Contact
The undersigned,confirms that the Property described below will be placed in use at the location listed below The undersigned confirms that the
Property described below has been delivered to and received by the Local Agency All installation or other work necessary prior to the use thereof has been
completed The Property has been examined and/or tested and is in good operating order and condition and is in all respects satisfactory to the Local Agency
and complies with all terms of the Master Financing Contract and the Financing Contract
Notwithstanding the foregoing,the undersigned does not waive or limit,by execution of this certificate,any claim against the sendor or any other
seller,installer,contractor or other provider of property or services related to the purchase,shipment,delivery,installation or maintenance of the Property
The Local Agency further confirms that the Properly will be used to fulfill an essential governmental function which the Local Agency has the
authonty to provide in the State
rrsssrsrsrrrussrrsrrrrrrwsrsrurrrrsrssrrrspssrrr
PROPERTY INFORMATION
Quantum Engineering&
Description Same as Annex 1 Notice of Intent Name of Vendor
Development
Address
Sena/No N/A
Tag No N/A Payment Amount
Disburse to
Location of Property
Method of Payment
Acquisition
Attached hereto an
1 A vendors invoice for the Property approved by the Local Agency
2 A Certificate of Insurance,demonstrating liability insurance coverage and stating that insurance will be renewed annually automatically,unless
said office notifies the State Treasurer of any discontinuation of coverage
In connection with the Local Agency's acquisition of the Property as agent of the Washington Finance Officers Association,you are hereby requested to
make a disbursement as indicated above
Authorized Agency Representative
Date
Countersigned and
Approved for Payment
Designated State Treasurer Representative
Date
]]
Annex 3 to Authonang Resolution(Egiupment)
Annex 4 to Authonzmg Resolution(Real Property)
Exhibit C to Financing Contract(Equipment)
Exhibit 8 to Financing Contract(Real Properly)
Certificate Designating Authorized Agency Representatives
I, Brenda Jacober , City Clerk of_the City of Kent_ (the"Local Agency"),hereby certify that,as of the date
hereof, pursuant to Resolution No /Ordinance No , the following individuals are each an "Authorized
Agency Representative," as indicated by the title appended to each signature, that the following individuals are duly
authorized to execute and deliver the Financing Contract to which this Certificate is attached as Exhibit C, and all
documentation in connection therewith, including but not limited to the Personal Property Certificate(s) attached thereto as
Exhibit B, that the signatures set forth below are the true and genuine signatures of said Authorized Agency Representatives
and that pursuant to such resolution/ordmance, of the following signature(s) [is/are) required on each of
the aforementioned documents in order to consider such documents executed on behalf of the Local Agency
Jim White Mayor
(signature) (name) (title)
(signature) (name) (title)
(signature) (name) (title)
Dated this day of ,20
City Clerk[Title]
City of Kent[Name of Local Agency]
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO before me this day of ,20_
By
NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of
Washington,residing at
Printed Name:
My Commission Expires
10
ANNEX 3
CITY OF KENT
AUTHORIZED AGENCY
REPRESENTATIVES
Annex 3 to Authorizing Resolution(Equipment)
Annex 4 to Authonang Resolution(Real Properly)
Exhibit C to Financing Conrnci(Egwpment)
Exhibit B to Financing Context(Real Property)
Certificate Designating Authorized Agency Representatives
I, Brenda Jacober , City Clerk of the City of Kent (the "Local Agency"),hereby certify that,as of the date
hereof, pursuant to Resolution No /Ordmance No , the following individuals are each an "Authorized
Agency Representative," as indicated by the title appended to each signature, that the following individuals dre duly
authorized to execute and deliver the Financing Contract to which this Certificate is attached as Exhibit C, and all
documentation in connection therewith, including but not limited to the Personal Property Certificate(s) attached thereto as
Exhibit B, that the signatures set forth below are the true and genume signatures of said Authorized Agency Representatives
and that pursuant to such resolution/ordinance, of the following signature(s) [is/are] required on each of
the aforementioned documents in order to consider—such documents executed on behalf of the Local Agency
Jim White Mayor
(signature) (name) (title)
(signature) (name) (title)
(signature) (name) (title)
Dated this day of ,20
City Clerk[Title]
City of Kent[Name of Local Agency]
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO before me this day of ,20_
By
NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of
Washington,residing at
Printed Name
My Commission Expires
to
Certificate Of Authorizing Resolution/Ordinance
I,the undersigned,Clerk/Secretary of the C�of Kent (the"Local Agency"),DO HEREBY CERTIFY
1 That the attached Resolution/Ordinance No (herein called the"Resolution/Ordinance")is a true and
correct copy of a Resolution/Ordinance of the Local Agency adopted/passed at a regular/special meeting of the Kent City
Council held on the 5 day of August ,20 03 ,and duly recorded in my office,
2. That said meeting was duly convened and held in all respects in accordance with law, and to the extent
required by law, due and proper notice of such meeting was given, that a quorum of the Kent City Council was present
throughout the meeting and a legally sufficient number of members of the Kent City Council voted in the proper manner
for the adoption/passage of the Resolution/Ordinance,
3 That all other requirements and proceedings incident to the proper adoption/passage of the
Resolution/Ordinance have been duly fulfilled,canned out and otherwise observed,
4 That the Resolution/Ordinance remains in full force and effect and has not been amended,repealed or
superseded, and
5 That I am authorized to execute this certificate
1N WITNESS WHEREOF, 1 have hereunto set my hand as of this day of
, 20
[SEAL)
0
0
9
Local Agency Tax Certificate
This Local Agency Tax Certificate is executed and delivered by the_City of Kent_ (the "Local
Agency") in connection with the Local Agency Financing Contract between the Local Agency and the
State of Washington (the "State"), dated as of , 200 , (the "Local Agency Financing
Contract"), under which the Local Agency is obligated to make Agency Installment Payments, including
principal components thereof in the aggregate amount of$_$1,285, 009_ (the"Obligations')
Capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Local
Agency Financing Contract. The Local Agency certifies, covenants, warrants and represents as follows:
ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL
1.1 The Local Agency. The Local Agency is a political subdivision duly organized
and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Washington The Local Agency has the
general authority to exercise the power of eminent domain in furtherance of its governmental purposes.
1.2 Purpose of Local Agency Tax Certificate. In the future, the State intends to
cause the execution and delivery of certificates of participation(the "Certificates") evidencing
undivided and proportionate interests in Installment Payments of the State payable under a Master
Financing Agreement A portion of the principal components of such Installment Payments are payable
from the Obligations. The Local Agency is delivering this Local Agency Tax Certificate to the State
with the understanding that the State will rely in part upon this Local Agency Tax Certificate in
obtaining an opinion from bond counsel that the interest component of the Certificates is excluded from
gross income for federal income tax purposes under Section 103 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
13 Purpose of Financing. The Obligations are being issued to finance the costs of
the acquisition, construction, improvement and/or renovation of_various mechanical, controls and
lighting systems at the City of Kent_(the "Project"), as described in more detail in the Financing
Contract.
1.4 Definitions. Unless the context otherwise requires,the following capitalized
terms have the following meanings.
"Code"means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (including amendments thereto)
"Current Revenues." See Section 2.7 hereof.
"Governmental Unit" means any state, or political subdivision of a state, but excludes the
United States and its agencies or instrumentalities.
"Investment Property" means any security or obligation, any annuity contract,or any
other investment-type property, but does not include any Tax-Exempt Bond unless such
obligation is a "specified private activity bond" within the meaning of Section 57(a)(5)(C) of the
Code.
"Nongovernmental Person"means any person or entity other than a Governmental Unit.
"Preliminary Expenditures"means architectural, engineering, surveying, soil testing, and
similar costs paid with respect to the Project in an aggregate amount not exceeding 20% of the
Obligations. However, Preliminary Expenditures do not include land acquisition, site preparation
or similar costs incident to the commencement of construction.
14
"Tax-Exempt Bond' means any obligation the interest on which is excluded from gross
income for federal income tax purposes pursuant to Section 103 of the Code or Section 103 of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended (the"1954 Code"), and Title XIII of the Tax
Reform Act of 1986, as amended, as well as stock in a regulated investment company to the
extent at least 95 percent of income to the stockholder is treated as interest that is excludable
from gross income under Section 103 of the Code
ARTICLE 1I. TAX LIMITATIONS
2 1 Expenditure of Proceeds. For purposes of this Local Agency Tax Certificate,
proceeds of the Obligation will be treated as spent when they are used to pay for or reimburse
disbursements by the Local Agency that paid for(i) capital expenditures, (it) any interest component of
the Agency Installment Payments through the later of three years after the date hereof or one year after
the Project is placed in service, or(ni) initial operating expenses directly associated with the Project (in
aggregate amount not exceeding 5% of the Obligations) The State has authorized the issuance of the
Certificates to finance, among other things, the costs of the Project Absent written agreement by the
State, all expenditures of proceeds of the Obligation will be made in respect of(a)Preliminary
Expenditures, (b) capital expenditures reimbursed in respect of payments made by the Local Agency on
or after the date which is sixty days prior to the date on which said authorization was adopted,or(c)
other payments made by the Local Agency on or after the date hereof. In connection with all
expenditures described in(b), the reimbursement allocation will be made no later than the later of 18
months after the date hereof or the date on which the Project is placed in service, but in no event later
than three years after the date of expenditure.
2.2 Governmental Bond Status. [Different text will be substituted for this section
when the loan is made for airport or port facilities that are the subject of private use ] The Local Agency
will not loan any of the proceeds of the Obligations to one or more Nongovernmental Persons The
Local Agency will not allow more than 10% of proceeds of the Obligations or more than 10"/u of the
Project to be used directly or indirectly by any Nongovernmental Person, other than as a member of the
general public. A Nongovernmental Person will be treated as "using"proceeds of the Obligations to the
extent the Nongovernmental Person:
(i) borrows proceeds of the Obligations, or
(it) uses the Project (ems, as owner, lessee, service provider, operator or manager).
2.3 Change in Use. The Local Agency reasonably expects to use all proceeds of the
Obligations and all of the Project as set forth in Section 2.2 of this Local Agency Tax Certificate for the
entire stated term to maturity of the Obligations. Absent written agreement by the State, the Local
Agency in fact will use all proceeds of the Obligations and all of the Project as set forth in Section 2 2 of
this Tax Certificate.
24 Federal Guarantee. The Local Agency will not directly or indirectly use or
permit the use of any proceeds of the Obligations or take or omit to take any action that would cause the
Certificates to be obligations that are "federally guaranteed" within the meaning of Section 149(b) of the
Code. In furtherance of this covenant, the Local Agency will not allow the payment of principal or
interest with respect to the Obligations to be guaranteed(directly or indirectly) in whole or in part by the
United States or any agency or instrumentality thereof The Local Agency will not use 5%or more of
the proceeds of the Obligations to make or finance loans the payment of principal or interest with
respect to which is guaranteed in whole or in part by the United States or any agency or instrumentality
thereof
15
2.5 No Refunding. Proceeds of the Obligations will not be used directly or indirectly to
make principal, interest or premium payments with respect to any obligation other than the Obligations.
26 No Hedge Bonds. The Local Agency reasonably expects that more than 85%of
proceeds of the Obligations will be expended for the purposes of the Obligations within three years
27 Debt Service Funds. Payments of debt service on the Obligations generally are
expected to be derived from current revenues of the Local Agency in each year, and Current revenues
are expected to equal or exceed debt service on the Obligations during each payment period Revenues
actually used in less than six months from the date first received to pay debt service on Obligations are
referred to herein as"Current Revenues." The account, or portion thereof, used by the Local Agency to
pay debt service on the Obligations will be used primarily to achieve a proper matching of revenues and
debt service within each year. To the extent of Current Revenues, such account in the aggregate will be
depleted at least once a year except for a carryover amount not to exceed the greater of the earnings on
such account for the immediately preceding year or 1/12 of the debt service in respect of the Obligations
for the immediately preceding year. Current Revenues contributed to such account will be spent within
thirteen months after the date of such contribution, and any amounts received from the investment or
reinvestment of monies held in such funds will be expended within one year after the date of
accumulation thereof in any such fund. Current Revenues in such account shall be invested without
regard to yield. Revenues other than Current Revenues will not be invested in Investment Property with
a yield exceeding the yield on the Obligations.
28 No Other Replacement Proceeds. The Local Agency will not use any proceeds
of the Obligations directly or indirectly to replace funds of the Local Agency which are or will be used
directly or indirectly to acquire Investment Property reasonably expected to produce a yield that is
materially higher than the yield on the Obligations. The weighted average maturity of the Obligations
does not exceed 120% of the expected weighted average economic useful life of the Project
29 No Expected Sale It is not expected that the Project or any part thereof will be
sold or otherwise disposed of before the maturity date of the Obligations
ARTICLE III. OTHER MATTERS
3.1 Expectations. The undersigned is an authorized representative of the Local
Agency acting for and on behalf of the Local Agency in executing this Local Agency Tax Certificate.
To the best of the knowledge and belief of the undersigned, there are no other facts, estimates or
circumstances that would materially change the expectations as set forth herein, and said expectations
are reasonable.
32 Amendments. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Local Agency Tax
Certificate, the Local Agency may amend this Local Agency Tax Certificate and thereby alter any
actions allowed or required by this Local Agency Tax Certificate if such amendment is signed by an
authorized officer and is supported by formal written agreement by the State.
3.3 Survival of Defeasance Notwithstanding any provision in this Local Agency
Tax Certificate to the contrary, the obligation to comply with all requirements contained in this Local
Agency Tax Certificate shall survive defeasance or prepayment of the Obligations.
Dated: , 200
16
LOCAL Program
Supplemental Credit Request Relating to Initiative 747
Please provide complete discussion and supporting documentation (if applicable) for the following. It
is important that all questions be answered completely and accurately.
1 Has the agency analyzed the budget impacts of Initiative 747?
(a) If no, why not?
(b) If yes, please discuss the results of the analysis, including steps being taken to address any potential
impacts Please attach documentation that was prepared for the analysis, if helpful
2 What was the agency's unrestricted Fund Balance at the agency's most recent fiscal year end9
3 What is the agency's expected unrestricted Fund Balance at the next upcoming fiscal year end9
4 To what extent is the agency planning to reduce Fund Balance to meet shortfalls that may result due to
implementation of Initiative 7479 What minimum Fund Balance is the agency willing to maintain?
18
Incumbency Certificate
I, Brenda Jacaber, City
following is a true and correct listing of fthef Cent, Washington, do hereby tern and their terms of office; City
Council members of the City of Kent fy that ie
Judy Woods
January 1, 2000 through December 31, 2003
Leona Orr
January 1, 2000 through December 31,2003
Tjm Clark
January 1, 2002 through December 31, 2005
Rico Yingling
January 1,2000 through December 31, 2003
Connie Epperly
January 1, 2000 through December 31, 2003
Julie Peterson
January 1, 2002 through December 31, 2005
Brace White
January 1, 2002 through December 31, 2005
Dated this
Brenda Jacober, City Clerk
• Kent City Council Meeting
Date August 5, 2003
Category Bids
1 SUBJECT: 2003 TRAFFIC STRIPING
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: The bid opening for this project was held on July 24,
2003 with three bids received. The low bid was submitted by Stripe Rite, Inc. in the
amount of$39,400.00. The Engineer's estimate was $40,775.00. The Public Works
Director recommends awarding this contract to Stripe Rite, Inc.
3. EXHIBITS: Bid tab
4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Director
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $39,400.00
SOURCE OF FUNDS: R00103
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION`l:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember econds
that the 2003 Traffic Striping contract be awarded to Stripe Rite, Inc for the low bid
amount of$39,400.00.
DISCUSSION. n0
ACTION-
Council Agenda
Item No. 8A
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Don E Wickstrom, P E Public Works Director
• Phone 253-856.5500
KENT Fax 253-856-6500
w.,s � o r o� Address 220 Fourth Avenue S
Kent,WA 98032-5895
DATE: August 5, 2003�
TO: Mayor Whtte ent City Council
FROM: Don Wickstro ublic Works Director
SUBJECT: 2003 Traffic Striping Project—Award Bid
SUMMARY: Bid opening for this project was held on July 24, 2003 with three bids received
The lowest bid was submitted by Stripe Rite, Inc in the amount of$39,400 00 The Engineer's
estimate was $40,775 00 The Public Works Director recommends awarding this contract to
Stripe Rite, Inc
Bid Summary
Stripe Rite, Inc $39,400 00
Apply-A-Line $44,340 00
Specialized Pavement Marking $55,860 00
• Engineer's Estimate $40,775 00
BUDGET IMPACT No Unbudgeted Fiscal/Personnel Impact
MOTION. Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds that
the 2003 Traffic Striping contract be awarded to Stnpe Rite, Inc for the low bid amount of
$39,400 00
Mayor White and Kent City Council 2003 Traffic Striping-Award Bid
August 5, 2003
1
Kent City Council Meeting
Date August 5, 2003
Category Bids
1. SUBJECT: ALVORD AVENUE N. WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: The bid opening for this project was held on July 24,
2003 with five bids received. The low bid was submitted by Site Development, Inc. in
the amount of$99,856.64. The Engineer's estimate was $138,740 67. The Public
Works Director recommends awarding this contract to Site Development, Inc.
3. EXHIBITS: Bid tab
4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Director
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $99.856.64
SOURCE OF FUNDS: W20103
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember 1�-a"LA moves, Councilmember seconds
that the Alvord Ave. N. Water Main Replacement contract be awarded to Site
Development, Inc. for the low bid amount of$99,856.64.
DISCUSSION: X0
• ACTION: -WlG
Council Agenda
Item No. 8B
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Don E Wickstrom, P E Public Works Director
• Phone 253-856-5500
K E N T Fax 253-856-6500
w.s H�,o� Address 220 Fourth Avenue S
Kent,WA 98032-5895
DATE: A%hite
2003
TO: M and Kent Ctty Council
FROM: Dkstrom, Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Alvord Ave N Water Main Replacement Project—Award Bid
SUMMARY: Bid opening for this project was held on July 24, 2003 with five bids received
The lowest bid was submitted by Site Development, Inc in the amount of$99,856 64 The
Engineer's estimate was S138,740 67 The Public Works Director recommends awarding this
contract to Site Development, Inc
Bid Summary
Site Development, Inc. $ 99,856 64
James A. Guess, Inc $111,094 59
VJM Construction Co., Inc. $127,861.81
Consturct Co LLC $132,084 81
Frank Coluccio Construction Co S157,186,62
Engineer's Estimate $138,740 67
BUDGET IMPACT No Unbudgeted FiscaUPersonnel Impact
MOTION Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds that
the Alvord Ave N Water Main Replacement contract be awarded to Site Development, Inc for
the low bid amount of$99.856 64
Mayor White and Kent City Council Alvord Ave N Water Main Replacement-Award Bid
August 5, 2003
1
Kent City Council Meeting
Date August 5, 2003
Category Bids
1. SUBJECT: 101ST AVENUE SE & SE 256TH ST. TRAFFIC SIGNAL
REVISION
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: The bid opening for this project was held on July 25,
2003 with four bids received. The low bid was submitted by Signal Electric, Inc. in the
amount of$63,973.00. The Engineer's estimate was $65,000.00. The Public Works
Director recommends awarding this contract to Signal Electric, Inc.
3. EXHIBITS: Bid tab
4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Director
• (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $63,973.00
SOURCE OF FUNDS: R20042
7 CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember efai J moves, Councilmember seconds
that the 101 st Ave. SE & SE 256th St. Traffic Signal Revision contract be awarded to
Signal Electric, Inc. for the low bid amount of$63,973.00.
DISCUSSION:
® ACTION.
Council Agenda
Item No. 8C
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Don E Wickstrom, P E Public Works Director
Phone 253-856.5500
K ENT Fax 253-856-6500
w.s.,.G,o. Address 220 Fourth Avenue S
Kent,WA 98032-5895
DATE: Augu 5, 2003
TO: May'te and Kent City Council
FROM: Don rom, Public Works Director
SUBJECT: 10151 Ave SE & SE 256ih St Traffic Signal Revision Project— Award Bid
SUMMARY: Bid opening for this project was held on July 25, 2003 with four bids received
The lowest bid was submitted by Signal Electric, Inc in the amount of$63,973 00 The
Engineer's estimate was $65,000 00 The Public Works Director recommends awarding this
contract to Signal Electric, Inc
Bid Summary
Signal Electric, Inc. $63,973 00
Transtech Electric, Inc $65,238 20
Totem Electric of Tacoma, Inc $68,370 00
Potelco, Inc $77,345 00
Engineer's Estimate $65,000.00
BUDGET IMPACT. No Unbudgeted Fiscal/Personnel Impact
MOTION Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds that
the 10151 Ave SE & SE 256ih St Traffic Signal Revision contract be awarded to Signal Electric,
Inc for the low bid amount of$63,973 00
Mayor White and Kent City Council 101"Ave SE&SE 256"Traffic Revision-Award Bid
August 5, 2003
1
• Kent City Council Meeting
Date August 5, 2003
Category Bids
1. SUBJECT: BOEING AND MILL CREEKS RESTORATION IMPROVEMENTS
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: The bid opening for this project was held on July 25,
2003 with five bids received. The low bid was submitted by SCI Infrastructure, LLC in
the amount of$291,663.15. The Engineer's estimate was $366,644.03. The Public
Works Director recommends awarding this contract to SCI Infrastructure, LLC.
3 EXHIBITS: Bid tab
• 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Director
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
6. EXPENDITURE REOUIRED: $291,663.15
SOURCE OF FUNDS: R90092
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTppION:
Councilmember U t,a4A moves, Councilmember seconds
that the Boeing and Mill Creek Restoration Improvements contract be awarded to SCI
Infrastructure, LLC for the low bid amount of$291,663.15.
DISCUSSION. - w
ACTION: mC
Council Agenda
Item No. 8D
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Don E Wickstrom, P E Public Works Director
Phone 253-856-5500
KENT Fax 253-856-6500
w.s ��,o H Address 220 Fourth Avenue S
Kent,WA 98032-5895
DATE: August 5, 2003
TO: Mayor White a ent City Council
FROM: Don Wickstro , blic Works Director
SUBJECT: Boeing &Mill Creeks Restoration Improvements Project— Award Bid
SUMMARY: Bid opening for this project was held on July 25, 2003 with five bids received.
The lowest bid was submitted by SCI Infrastructure, LLC in the amount of$291,663 15. The
Engineer's estimate was $366,644 03 The Public Works Director recommends awarding this
contract to SCI Infrastructure, LLC
Bid Summary
SCI Infrastructure, LLC $291,663 15
Scarsella Brothers, Inc $341,404 50
Road Construction NW, Inc $364,888.00
Construction Co , LLC $373,479 66
Frank Coluccio Const , Co $526,698 08
Engineer's Estimate $366,644 03
BUDGET IMPACT No Unbudgeted Fiscal/Personnel Impact
MOTION Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds that
the Boeing & Mill Creeks Restoration Improvements contract be awarded to SCI Infrastructure,
LLC for the low bid amount of$291,663 15.
Mayor White @nd Kent City Council Boeing&Mill Creeks Restoration Imp -Award Bid
August 5, 200a
\ 1
REPORTS FROM STANDING COMMITTEES AND STAFF
A. COUNCIL PRESIDENT
B. OPERATIONS COMMITTEE
C. PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE ��gg�
D. PUBLIC WORKS
•
E PLANNING COMMITTEE QAJ-L) -6
F. PARKS COMMITTEE U" L rr\. �{µ
G. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS_ Gtdc &Yv
REPORTS FROM SPECIAL COMMITTEES
ro PARKS COMMITTEE MINUTES
NNE 109 2003
COMMITTEE MEMBERS: Chair Judy Woods,Connie Epperly, Bruce White
The meeting was called to order by Chair Judy Woods at 4:06 P.M. A correction was made to
the agenda changing the minutes of the last meeting to May 12,2003. "Recognition of Park
Department Employees"was added to the agenda.
Recognition or Park Department Employees
Lori Hogan, Superintendent of Recreation and Cultural Services, introduced Lea Bishop,
Manager of the Senior Activity Center,and Cindy VandenBerg, Program Coordinator, who were
recently honored by their peers at the Washington State Association of Senior Centers with
awards for innovative programming and leadership in the association Ms.Bishop received the
Professional of the Year award, and Ms. VandenBerg received the Rising Star award. She said
the Kent Senior Activity Center is a model for the state and the region in senior programming.
Approval of Minutes of May 12, 2003
Committee Member Bruce White moved to approve the minutes dated May 12, 2003. The
motion was seconded by Committee Member Connie Epperly and passed 3-0.
Cultural Development Authority Grant of King County—Accept and Amend Budget
Cultural Programs Manager Ronda Billerbeck said that the Cultural Development Authority of
King County had awarded the City of Kent Arts Commission$10,080 in their 2003 Sustained
Support program. Funding will be applied to"Spotlight Series"performances,the Summer
Concert Series,and two Missoula Children's Theatre youth residencies. The grant money comes
from the hotel/motel tax.
Connie Epperly moved to accept the$10,080 in funding from the Cultural Development
Authority of King County and amend the Kent Arts Commission budget. The motion was
seconded by Bruce White and passed 3-0.
2004 Western States Arts Federation (WESTAF) Grants—Accept and Amend Budget
Ronda Billerbeck said that the Western States Arts Federation had awarded the Kent Arts
Commission two"TourWest"Grants for the presentation of touring performances and
educational activities in the 2004 season. $1,000 was awarded to present an evening of chamber
music by the Chvatal Kritzer Duo,and$2,500 was awarded to present legendary gospel singers,
The Blind Boys of Alabama.
Bruce White moved to accept the two Western States Arts Federation"TourWest" Grants
for$3,500 to support the Kent Arts Commission's 2004 performing season and amend the
Kent Arts Commission budget. The motion was seconded by Connie Epperly and passed
3-0.
Lease Agreement with Voicestream for Cell Tower at Riverbend Driving Ranee
Parks Planning and Development Superintendent Lori Flemm said that Voicestream PCS III
Corporation was requesting to enter into an agreement with the City of Kent to lease a porton of
the Riverbend Golf Complex, with a nonexclusive access easement, to construct wireless
communications antennas on a net pole and related wireless communications ground equipment,
support structures, and cables. Project Manager Shane Gilbertson said that Voicestream would
be paying a monthly rent of$1,250 to the City of Kent.
Connie Epperly moved to authorize the Alayor to enter into an agreement with
Voicestream PCS III Corporation to lease a portion of the Riverhead Golf Complex
Driving Range to construct and maintain communication antennas and equipment.The
motion was seconded by Bruce White and passed 3-0.
Way Back Inn Foundation Rental Aereement Renewal for Campus Park House
Lori Flemm gave a Power Point presentation on the Way Back Inn Foundation, which is anal]
volunteer non profit organization dedicated to providing temporary housing to homeless families
for the purpose of making the transition from homelessness to a permanent home. The Way
Back Inn Foundation makes repairs and life cycle improvements on Campus Park House, located
north of Kent Kangley Road and west of Kent Meridian High School,and provides routine
maintenance in exchange for the lease of the house. The lease term is 5 years and the current
lease expires on July 9, 2003. Because there are renters in the house, an inspection is needed by
August I S'or 19'". A new rental period would start September 1,2003 and last for 5 years
Bruce White moved to authorize the 114ayor to enter into agreements with the Way Back
Inn Foundation for the Campus Park House for an interim ]case agreement from July 9
through August 31,2003 and a five year lease from July 9 through August 31,2008. The
motion was seconded by Connie Epperly and passed 3-0.
Riverview Park Salmon Enhancement Project Proposal
Lori Flemm and Mike Mactutis, Public Works Storm Water Engineer, presented the Riverview
Park Salmon Enhancement Project. The City of Kent Public Works Department,and the Parks,
Recreation and Community Service Department, in conjunction with the US Army Corps of
Engineers, is proposing to cut a through channel for salmon enhancement at the undeveloped
Riverview Park. The City will enter into an agreement with the Corps of Engineers once funding
becomes available. Ten percent of the total project budget has to go for recreation
enhancements,the other 90% for habitat enhancements. And,there are matching funds of 35%
required from the City of Kent,which would come from the City Drainage Fund and the value of
the land.
The meeting adjourned at 4:42 PM.
Jackie Bicknell
Council Secretary
0
Planning Committee Minutes
June 17, 2003
Committee Members: Leona Orr,Tim Clark, Bruce White
The meeting was called to order by Chair Leona Orr at 3 00 PM.
Approval of Minutes of May 20,2003
Bruce White moved to approve the minutes of the May 20, 2003, Planning Committee meeting
The motion was seconded by Tim Clark and passed 3-0
Regulatory Review Process
Community Development Director Fred Satterstrom said there were three wa)s to initiate a code
amendment—by City staff, by the City Council, and by private application The private
applications must pay a fee to sponsor suggestions for regulatory change Staff is proposing an
additional way in which private citizens could bring potential code amendments forward through
a docketing process, which could be established on a no-fee basis The docketing process would
sa%e up and prioritize the amendments which would then be brought forward on a regular basis
to the City Council or the Land Use and Planning Board for consideration
Bruce White mov ed to direct Cit) staff to establish a docketing process for citizen initiated
code amendments through its administratne procedures. Tim Clark seconded the motion.
In further discussion, Tim Clark stipulated he did not want the Land Use and Planning Board to
have to spend a lot of time considering the amendments fie suggested they should not go above
seven in count before being brought before the Board or Council
Leona Orr offered a friendly amendment that the process should be established, but that it
should be brought back to Committee before going to Council. The motion,w ith the
friendly amendment, then passed 3-0.
Impoundment Reservoir Comprehensive Plan Amendment #CPA-2003-2 & OCPZ-2003-1
Emergency Resolution.
Planning Manager Charlene Anderson said the City no longer needs the land purchased for the
purpose of constructing an impoundment reservoir for the City's water utility system In order
for the City to sell the property, an appropriate comprehensive plan designation and zoning map
must be assigned Amendments to the comprehensive plan may occur no more than once a year
unless an emergency exists, so staff is recommending a resolution declaring an emergency of
order to implement appropriate procedures to develop an initial comprehensive plan and zoning
map designation for the property
Tim Clark moved to recommend adoption of a resolution declaring an emergency to
pursue an amendment to the Kent comprehensive plan and zoning map in order to
Planning Committee,6/17/03 2
establish initial land use and zoning designations for the impoundment reservoir property.
The motion was seconded by Bruce White and passed 3-0.
Mr. White pointed out a typo on Page 2 of the ordinance, second paragraph, fourth line."not"
should be"nor".
Kent City Code Amendment#CPA-2003-1 (K1VA #2031290) Capital Facilities Element
Yearly Update Process
Charlene Anderson said the code amendment proposal adds provisions for considering city
initiated amendments to the comprehensive plan more frequently than once per year and
provides for a public hearing before the City Council rather than the Land Use & Planning board
for certain amendments to the Capital Facilities Element
Tim Clark mo%ed to recommend approval of ZCA-2003-1 as recommended by the Land
Use and Planning Board and staff,and to direct the City Attorney to prepare the necessary
ordinance to be considered on the Consent Calendar at the July 15"City Council meeting.
The motion *as seconded by Bruce White and passed 3-0.
The meeting adjourned at 3.40 PM
Jackie Bicknell
Council Secretary
ed, d
is[, R
e cot
Ong
dvan
ice c
PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES
JUNE 10, 2003
COMMITTEE MEMBERS Connie Epperly,Julie Peterson,Judy Woods, sitting in for Rico Yingling
The meeting was called to order by Chair Connie Epperly at 5 00 PM "Transient Population"was added
to the agenda as Item number 4
Approval or Minutes or May 19,2003
Committee Member Julie Peterson moved to approve the minutes of the May 19,2003 meeting The
motion was seconded by substitute Committee Member Judy Woods and passed 3-0
King County Basic Life Support Services Contract for 2003
Fire Chief Jim Schneider said the City would receive$728,557 from the annual King County Basic Life
Support Services Contract The money will go to offset some of the cost of supplies and salaries in the
EMS operating budget
Julie Peterson moved to recommend that Council authorize the Mayor to sign the contract with
Seattle-King County Department of Public Health/Emergency Medical Services Division. The
motion was seconded by Judy Woods and passed 3-0.
Purchase of Medium Duty Aid Vehicle
Chief Jim Schneider said a medium duty aid vehicle had been identified for replacement this year on the
Fire Department's apparatus replacement schedule The City will save money by using the same contract
as was used last year The vehicle will cost$160,000 and funds will come from the Vehicle Apparatus
Replacement Fund and be assigned to Station#73 on the West Hill
Julie Peterson moved to recommend that Council authorize the Mayor to sign the contract between
the City of Kent and H& W Emergency Vehicles for the purchase of one(1)medium duty aid
vehicle. The motion was seconded by Judy Woods and passed 3-0.
Transient Population
Police Chief Ed Crawford said some of the downtown businesses and others in the City had met with the
PohcL Department and Parks Department employees to talk about the transient problem He said there
had been problems in the downtown area for quite some time having to do with transients not following
rules,taking over certain areas, and drinking in public The Police Department's obligation from the
meeting was to direct bike officers into the downtown core and to concentrate on covering parks and
alleys seven days a week and to have a zero tolerance for all violators The officers will contact three
businesses per shift and will keep daily logs for tracking activities They will talk to businesses to see if
there is away they could voluntarily say no to selling alcoholic beverages to the transient population
The Corrections facility work crews will pickup litter in the alleyways from the 7-I1 on Central Avenue
to the Chevron Station on Central Avenue and a block on either side
The meeting adjourned at 5 15 PM
Jackie Bicknell
CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS
A
EXECUTIVE SESSION
A) Property Acquisitions
B) Potential Litigations
•
ACTION AFTER EXECUTIVE SESSION
A)