Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Meeting - Council - Agenda - 02/19/2002 City of Kent City Council Meeting Agenda i rs • KEN T W A S H I N G T O N r Mayor Jim White _ Councilmembers Tim Clark, Council Presidents Connie Epperly Bruce White Leona Orr Judy Woods Julie Peterson RicoYingling , February 19, 2002 � ay Office of the City Clerk d SUMMARY AGENDA KENT CITY COUNCIL MEETING February 19, 2002 KENT Council Chambers WASHINGTON 7 : 00 p.m. MAYOR: Jim White COUNCILMEMBERS: Tim Clark, President Connie Epperly Leona Orr Julie Peterson Judy Woods Bruce White Rico Yingling 1 . CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE 2 . ROLL CALL 3 . CHANGES TO AGENDA A. FROM COUNCIL, ADMINISTRATION, OR STAFF B. FROM THE PUBLIC 4 . PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS A. King County Council Member Julia Patterson B. Community Arts Support Program Presentation C. Employee of the Year S . PUBLIC HEARINGS None 6. CONSENT CALENDAR q� A. Minutes - Approval B. Bills - Approval C. 2001 Comprehensive Plan Amendments - �inances - D. Country Club Division II Bill of Sale - Accept E. Councilmember Absence, Yingling - Approve F. Surplus Hose - Authorize G. Surplus Fire Engine/Aid Units - Authorize H. S. 212th Street Replacement Well - Accept as Complete I . Wiesner Drainage Improvements - Accept as Complete J. King Co y 2001 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan - Rolution ILO 10 Tacoma Second Supply Project Committee Representation Authorize L. 2002 Street Sweeping Contract - Authorize M. Department of Ecology Grant Agreement, 2001 Drought Relief - Authorize N. Golf Course System Software Purchas Authorize 0. Real Estate Excise Tax Amendment finance 33`14Z P. Puget Sound Senior Baseball 'League on - Accept and Amend Budget Q. East Hill Youth Sports Art - Approve R. Kherson Park Sewer Connection Permit - Accept and Amend Budget S. Off Leash Dog Park Issue Paper - Accept 7 . OTHER BUSINESS A. 2002 Budget Adjustments Oinance 3 5ti3 B. eet Improvement/Street Utility Tax - Sunset Repeal - r inane 3;o\q G, alb 350 (continued next page) D. Police G{a/vct SUMMARY AGENDA CONTINUED S . BIDS 4 None 9 . REPORTS FROM STANDING COMMITTEES AND STAFF 10 . REPORTS FROM SPECIAL COMMITTEES 11 . CONTINU{E�D COMMUNICATIONS 12 . EXECUTIVEf C1dQ!( ION V lJ�/ ~t✓' Y' 13 . ADJOURNMENT NOTE: A copy of the full agenda packet is available for perusal in the City Clerk' s Office and the Kent Library. The Agenda Summary page is on the City of Kent web site at www.ci .kent .wa.us. An explanation of the agenda format is given on the back of this page . Any person requiring a disability accommodation should contact the City Clerk' s Office in advance at (253) 856-5725 . For TDD relay service call the Washington Telecommunications Relay Service at 1-800-833-6388 . x - w Tdi I Citizens wishing to cess `� caun at this time, F make known the subjeCf oaf intst, so , Jae properly f, _ heard. A) FROM COUNCIL, OMINISTRATION, M, ,� ' B) FROM THE PUBLIO'' I s *i„ M ; I9 1 �• � 4 ♦� V( i i n Y7 i � F lV� _ 41, )ppa 1f -;OMML*ICATIOIfif8% iiioj A) KING COUNTY CO I� IMEN*, 7MIA^ All B) COMMUNITY ARTS � iPPORT PROGRAM PAZ$'� r k ' —Jr 31e i F r 't n a I4 C) EMPLOYEE OF TH$ 1EAR 4 s M rd t„ ilt , All! p j a " �BNDAR 6 . City CouAc it Actioaa . ` CGuneilmember mov Coin 'r e! W D b a�A S , seconds to approve Cott Calwdar It 'I t h S . Discussion 4 V kA,4�' - , g y r e, e bJ„� Action 6Y+ � `� �_ ��6A. 8urozaal Qf Minutes. Approval of the minute4lof the regular C '` ting, of -t, February 5, 2002 . E E" n. 613. A " I' Approval of Sills. - _ Approval of payment of w*4-, jbillis� rece;WLe4 �� ] <,January 31 � and' paid on January 31i fear au4it$ng by � j „ �t�ons fr• Committee on February' �j, 2402. 'e' ' '�" '�- A royal of checks isr l f iq iU '� . PP s iddlfor vouchers: _ ,� ,� I - ;t ,fry; Date k3�Ceck Numbers .i �� Amount 1/331/02 Wire Tranfers 1i10-1115 ,4 03 , 605 .12 1/31/02 Prepays & )528612 � '� � ,� 198, 915. 30 1/31 02 Regular 52�334 q i43, 180. 94 i'45, 701. 36 , 1 . Approval of checks isp�jd 'for payroll fqiT-, '!I through s, t January 15 and paid on ,,Tanuary 18, 2002: °r=_ x rs � ' i tDate OC ' k � ? 1/18/02 Checks 257573 132$, 705 .54 1/18/02 Advices ,122972-123906 a ', 29, 726. 00 56,431 . 54 Approval of checks is for payroll fad :116 through .z January 31 and paid anbruary 5 2002 : j: Date i 1 epk Numbers unt . `�; 2/5/02 Checks = 7341-258289 " �'� 163, 966.31 2/5/02 Advices "1i f;07--124630 ;�' �y 7$ 477 .95 r� 42, 444 .26 t I,N y� i4[ d I 'N s' -i- ouncil Agenda , I sltem No. 6 A-B — - - , _ . Kent, Washington February 5 , 2002 The regular meeting of the Kent City Council was called to order at 7 : 00 p .m. by Mayor White . Councilmembers present : Clark, Epperly, Orr, Peterson, White, Woods, and Yingling. Others present : Chief Administrative Officer Martin, City Attorney Brubaker, Interim Fire Chief Hamilton, Public Works Director Wickstrom, Community Development Director Satterstrom, Parks, Recreation and Community Services Director Hodgson, Finance Director Miller and Information Technology Director Mulholland. Approximately 125 people were at the meeting (CFN-198) CHANGES TO THE AGENDA Consent Calendar Items D and I were removed and placed under Other Business at the request of Council members Continued Communications Item A was added at the request of Bob O ' Brien. (CFN-198) PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS State of the City Address. Mayor White gave his annual State of the City Address, noting that the City will face significant challenges in 2002 , but that it is well positioned to meet them. He said the city is healthy, organizationally strong and fiscally secure . He stated that , like the rest of the nation, Kent has suffered under a declining economy and that he has directed all city departments to reduce their budgets by the amount needed to restore the reserve to 10% of the General Fund. Mayor White explained that the City took the unusual step of refusing to use the full taxing authority it is entitled to, and therefore the property tax rate will be lower in 2002 than at any other time in the last 11 years . He added that as taxes shrink, economy must grow, and noted that Kent Station will soon become the city' s new economic anchor. He also said the deficit in youth sports facilities will be addressed by the addition of the East Hill Youth Sports Complex. The Mayor also spoke about enhancing the City' s light industrial base, the opening of the new ice rink, commissioning of Valley Communications Center, implementation of the new one-stop Permit Center, completion of the 196th Corridor, and work on the 277th and 228th Street projects . Others issue brought up in the address were the increase of water supply capability by 40%, the Sounder Commuter train, the 5-story parking garage, agricultural property and public safety. (CFN-198) 1 Kent City Council Minutes February 5 , 2002 PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Employee of the Month. Mayor White announced that Information Technology Director Marty Mulholland has been selected as February Employee of the Month. He noted that Ms . Mulholland has changed the city' s appearance and operation to one of leading edge high performance through her efficiency and performance. He added that she is dedicated, innovative and exudes true leadership, and exemplifies the Kent Cares philosophy. CAO Martin added that Ms . Mulholland is heavily involved in city activities such as United Way, and that her leadership is reflected in the high morale in her department . The Employee of the Month plaque was then presented to Marty by Mayor White. (CFN-147) National Night Out Presentation. Judy Mauhl of the Police Department explained the Block Watch program and announced that in the competition for cities with a population under 100, 000, Kent ranked 7th in the nation She added that Kent ranked 17th in 1999 and 13th in 2000 . She displayed the National Award and thanked Mayor, City Council and all the citizens of Kent who helped. (CFN-122) Introduction of Appointees. Mayor White introduced Connie Epperly, appointee to the LEOFF Disability Board, and Karen Minehan, Richard Manoli and Rod Blalock, appointees to the Drinking Driver Task Force . (CFN-198) Government Finance Officers Association Award. Finance Director Miller explained that Budget Analyst Kathleen Senecaut developed a small comprehensive budget to hand out to citizens who need a short version of the budget . The award was presented to Ms . Senecaut . (CFN-155) Traffic Solutions Committee Presentation. Traffic Engineer Steve Mullen explained a contest which was recently held having to do with traffic congestion, and announced the winners and their suggestions as follows : Diana Woeck - left turn lane at 101st Avenue SE and SE 256th 2 Kent City Council Minutes February 5, 2002 PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Denny Naumec - islands on Central Avenue at Smith and James to restrict driving in left turn lanes Ron Logan - allow another lane of travel on 132nd Avenue SE The winners were given certificates for a ride-along with a Kent traffic officer. Mullen asked citizens with other suggestions to call the hotline at 253-856-5566 or visit the website at www.kent .wa us . (CFN-198) Arts Day 2002 . Mayor White read a proclamation noting that arts are a fundamental aspect of human experience and are necessary to the quality of life and proclaimed February 12 , 2002 as Arts Day 2002 in the City of Kent . He encouraged all citizens to celebrate the vitality of arts in our city and state . The proclamation was presented to Carol McPherson, Chair the of the Arts Commission, who expressed thanks to the Mayor, Council, staff and citizens . (CFN-155) City Attorney. Mayor White introduced Tom Brubaker and announced that he has been appointed City Attorney. (CFN-198) CONSENT CALENDAR CLARK MOVED to approve Consent Calendar Items A through H, with the exception of Item D. Woods seconded and the motion carried. MINUTES (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 6A) (CFN-198) Approval of Minutes. Approval of the minutes of the regular Council meeting of January 15, 2002 . PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY SERVICES (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 6C) (CFN-136) Surplus Equipment. Authorization to surplus two John Deere yard tractors : equipment numbers 9945 and 9946 , and one John Deere mower: equipment number 1008, as recommended by the Parks, Recreation and Community Services Director. The equipment has been replaced by is newer models and is no longer in use. 3 Kent City Council Minutes February 5, 2002 PUBLIC RECORDS (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 6D) (CFN-1266) (REMOVED BY COUNCIL MEMBER WHITE) Public Records Request Procedures Ordinance. The pro- posed ordinance would modify existing policy provisions to clarify and streamline the processing procedure and make other revisions and additions to the existing policy in order to provide a quicker response to the public . It would also provide a better way for the public to access the City' s public records disclosure processing procedure . Council member White noted that Section 1 . 05 . 040 of the ordinance lists only two ways of making a request , that being in person or by mail . He suggested allowing use of the web site to make public records requests . CLARK MOVED to adopt Ordinance No. 3588 as written. Martin explained that there is no problem using the web for such requests, and that a form can be developed. He estimated the cost of handling requests at $250, 000 for the last 1-1/2 years . He agreed with the Mayor' s sugges- tion to monitor the number of requests received on the web. Yingling voiced concern about security and reliabi- lity, then seconded Clark' s motion It was clarified for Peterson that this refers to making a request via the web format, not about disbursing the information back via e-mail . WHITE MOVED to amend Section 1 . 05 . 040 to include allowing requests to be made over the City' s web site . Epperly seconded. Clark voiced opposition, noting that this would add to the workload of the Technology Department as they face staffing reductions, and that if this were approved, people would expect to tap in next week. He suggested testing the technology beforehand, approving the ordinance as is and directing staff to develop a working model , at which time the amendment could be added in. ORR agreed and OFFERED A FRIENDLY AMENDMENT to White ' s motion to amend, to give staff six months to do research and develop an implementation plan. White agreed to the friendly amendment . Upc,n Yingling ' s question, Brubaker said problems could arise from web page transmittal of requests . He explained that in litigation situations, the time the request is received and the time it takes to respond can 4 Kent City Council Minutes February 5, 2002 PUBLIC RECORDS become an issue and potentially a liability for the city. He said he is unclear about whether the city has the technology to fill out a form by e-mail and submit it by e-mail . He stated that he would prefer to have a written request because of the certainty it has provided in the past . Brubaker noted for Orr that the ordinance could be amended at any time in the future. WOODS MOVED to table the issue . Peterson seconded and the motion carried. Brubaker clarified that the proposed ordinance is already in effect as a City policy, so the procedures already in place are not being limited by tabling the issue . Joe Rubio, 3831 S . 248th, spoke in favor of tabling the matter and said other cities use e-mail and fax. Ted Kogita also spoke in favor of using e-mail . LID 350 (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 6E) (CFN-1144) _ LID 350 - Big K Sanitary Sewer & Water Main. Authorization to set the Public Hearing for March Sth on the confirmation of the Final Assessment Roll for LID 350 - Big K Sanitary Sewer & Water Main, as recommended by the Public Works Committee . PUBLIC WORKS (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 6F) (CFN-1144) Big K Sanitary Sewer & Water Main Project. Accept the Big K Sanitary Sewer & Water Main project as complete and release of retainage to R.L. Alia Company upon standard releases from the state and release of any liens . The original contract amount was $1 , 246, 183 . 45, as recom- mended by the Public Works Director. The final contract amount is $1, 057, 124 . 88 . (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 6I) (CFN-1038) (REMOVED BY COUNCILMEMBER ORR) Kent/Covington Water District Agreement. The Public Works Committee recommended that the Mayor be authorized to sign the Kent/Covington Water District Joint Agreement, upon concurrence of the final language by the Public Works Director and the City Attorney. The agreement authorizes the Covington Water District to 5 Kent City Council Minutes February 5, 2002 PUBLIC WORKS construct a connection from the City of Tacoma ' s P1 water supply line to both Kent and Covington Water District ' s systems . The City would pay half the cost of construction. ORR MOVED that the Mayor be authorized to sign the Kent Covington Water District Joint Agreement, upon con- currence of the language therein by the Public Works Director and the City Attorney. Woods seconded. Orr explained that the Public Works Committee recommended unanimously to approve this item. She noted that the final form of the agreement was received yesterday, and explained that the project will allow additional capacity as needed. White commented that he had not had time to review the agreement, and Wickstrom explained that the project is very time sensitive. Orr' s motion then carried with White abstaining. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 7A) (CFN-377) 2001 Comprehensive Plan Amendments. By ordinance, amend- ments to the Kent Comprehensive Plan are processed collectively once every year. Applications for eight plan amendments were received by September 21, 2001 . Six of them proposed changes to both the comprehensive plan land use and zoning maps . The Land Use and Planning Board held a public hearing on December 10, 2001 . Bill Osborne of the Planning Department displayed the location of the following proposals, described the intent of each and outlined the Board' s recommendation for each: Proposal B - Soos Creek Center Proposal C - Klouzal Proposal D - Amerinor/Cameron Proposal E - Fanning/Scharer Proposal F - DeRose Proposal G - Kent and Federal Way School Districts Proposal H - City of Kent Capital Facilities Element After Osborne and Wickstrom answered questions from the Council members, ORR MOVED to approve the Land Use and Planning Board' s recommendations on proposed 2001 annual comprehensive plan and zoning amendments B through F, and 6 Kent City Council Minutes February 5, 2002 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN to direct the City Attorney to prepare the necessary ordinances . Woods seconded and the motion carried. ORR MOVED to approve Proposal G, the Kent and Federal Way School Districts request to amend the text of the City of Kent Comprehensive Plan Capital Facilities Element and Kent City Code Chapter 12 . 13 to reflect proposed changes to impact fees resulting from new student population generated by new single family and multifamily residen- tial development . Woods seconded and the motion carried. ORR MOVED to approve Proposal H, City of Kent Capital Facilities Element Amendment, proposed text changes to the Capital Facilities Element of the City of Kent Comprehensive Plan. Yingling seconded and the motion carried. Martin announced that an interpreter will be available during discussion of Proposal A, Still Manor Retirement Living. Bill Osborne of the Planning Department displayed the location of Proposal A, described the intent of the amendment and noted that the Board has recommended denial . Andy Andras, 1035 W. Smith #47, explained that it is the owner' s responsibility to make sure their mobile home is properly maintained so that it can be moved. He added that the tenant ' s petition is asking the City for con- sideration to help the tenants with relocation, not commitments . Andras said they are willing to partner with the City to develop a relocation fund, and said only 501C organizations can access grants . He added that the cost of moving a mobile home is $500, and asked that Council approve the zoning change. , Mary Hughes, 14716 SE 274th Court, representing Century 21 New Horizons, outlined marketing and leasing issues Ted N- xon, 420 W. Harrison #202 , said the revision to the comp plan is not detrimental to the safety, health or welfare of the city, that the surrounding area has changed, and that it meets all land use goals . He referred to a letter provided to the Council today 7 Kent City Council Minutes February 5 , 2002 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN regarding providing low and medium income people the opportunity to purchase new mobile homes . Robert McKenna, 1035 W. Smith #37, voiced concern about what will happen to the residents and distributed copies of statistics regarding the Mobile Home Park. After dis- cussing the statistics, he urged the Council not to rezone because of the impact to the residents. Merry Marshall , Still Manor Mobile Home Park #9, repre- senting some of the residents of the park, asked the Council not to rezone them out of their homes . She said when mobile homes are moved, they depreciate by one- third, and that it would cost $6, 000 to move each home, which is more than most of their annual incomes . Lauraine Carlson, Still Manor Mobile Home Park, said some of the families will have to go to shelters or low-income housing She said it is not practical to move and asked the Council to take another look at not rezoning. She said if residents could keep their homes in the park, they would renovate the property to make it look better, and urged Mr. Still and the Council to consider that . John Still, 33205 30th SW, Federal Way, explained that the park was legally closed on December 19, 2001, and whether or not the rezoning is approved or not, it has been closed by state law. He added that residents have until December 31, 2002 , to move, and that they cannot be required to upgrade their trailers because of relocation. He said the rezone will benefit the city significantly, and that over 250 seniors with specific and special needs will be housed with dignity. He cited construction jobs, construction fees, sales tax, addressing of future city needs, tax base, downtown rejuvenation and community jobs as benefits of the project . He asked the Council to approve the rezone . Terry Zimmerman, 27030 47th Avenue So. #109, Chair of the Land Use and Planning Board and former social worker, said the residents of the park are property owners but not land owners, so they don' t have rights under the law to be notified. She said there should be better notifi- cation. Zimmerman said the homes cannot be sold and cannot be moved due to their age, and that the cost to move a single wide is $3500 and a double wide is $7000 , 8 Kent City Council Minutes February 5, 2002 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN which these residents cannot afford. She said it is unacceptable for the community to allow an action which would put 46 households next to homelessness . She suggested that the Human Service Office of the City of Kent and other human service agencies be involved, and that a community meeting be convened. Jaime Garcia, 6112 S . 296th Court, Auburn, agreed with Zimmerman and said the residents of the park represent vulnerable populations, elderly, non-English speaking people, and the working poor. He asked that the Council look for someone to work with the residents in a bilingual fashion to offer them opportunities to up- grade their property or relocate . Dori Elias, 23701 110th Avenue SE, Executive Director of the Minority Executive Directors Coalition of King County, expressed concern about the potential displacement of these families and expressed support in helping convene a community meeting to find solutions for the residents . Jeffrey Keck, 23535 Marine View Drive, Des Moines, said the surrounding area is already zoned General Commercial and there is no reason not to approve the request . He reiterated that notice has been given and that the park is closing. Solange Diaz, #20 , said her trailer is 49 years old and is impossible to move. She asked for the opportunity to move with dignity at a later time, and asked the City to work with Mr. Still to reach an agreement . Ursula Linski, #19, spoke in support of the residents . She asked for help in moving in a dignified way, and said a fast solution is needed. Victor Sandoval , #42 , agreed that a solution is needed soon, and that time is passing quickly. Ted Kogita said that the tax base is the issue, and that the children living in the park will be making money in ten years . Antonio in #20 said it is important to better the city, but that the residents are not pre- pared to move within a year. He said if more time were allowed, the trailers could be improved, and that moving will not benefit their children Martin_ Plys, 3004 S 256th, said taxpayers are tired of being told what to do with their land, and that more welfare cannot be allowed. 9 Kent City Council Minutes February 5, 2002 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Upon questions from Council members, Terry Zimmerman said that she believes notice was not given to the residents until after the Land Use and Planning Board hearing, and that the Board members felt strongly about the decision they made. She said there were no zoning reasons for denying the request. ORR MOVED to approve the Land Use and Planning Board' s recommendation on this proposed 2001 annual comprehensive plan and zoning amendment Proposal A, and to direct the City Attorney to direct the necessary ordinances Woods seconded Orr said taxpayer dollars cannot be used to assist tenants and that she cannot support the rezone . Yingling said the property owner has taken the legally required steps to close the park and that nothing will change that fact . He said staying in the park is not an answer and that the Human Services Department help with real solutions. Epperly agreed. Peterson said this is a land use issue and that changing to a commercial use makes sense. She added that com- passion is important and that this is an opportunity to help Kent residents from a human services aspect . Clark disagreed with Mr. Plys, noting that the Council makes land use decisions . He stated that a variety of housing is needed and that two very large mobile home parks are in the potential annexation area. Woods said there must be better notification, there must be translation service, and that other mobile home park issues will have to be addressed in the future. White spoke in opposition to Orr' s motion, noting that he cannot see any land use issue for not allowing the rezone to occur. He volunteered his time and effort as a private citizen in fund raising to help the residents move on. Orr pointed out that on February 19 the Planning Committee will begin looking at how to deal with this type of issue. CLARK MOVED to make Mr. Nixon' s letter, the petition from the residents, and the statistical report a part of the 10 Kent City Council Minutes February 5, 2002 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN letter. Orr seconded and added Mr. Keck' s letter. The motion carried. Upon a roll call vote, the motion to approve the Land Use and Planning Board' s recommendation denying the rezone then failed, with Clark, Orr and Woods in favor and Epperly, Peterson, White and Yingling opposed. PETERSON MOVED to deny the Land Use and Planning Board' s recommendation on Proposal A of the 2001 annual compre- hensive plan and zoning amendments, and to approve the rezone request and the comprehensive plan amendment request . White seconded. Upon a roll call vote, the motion carried with Epperly, Peterson, White and Yingling in favor, and Clark, Orr and Woods opposed. APPOINTMENTS (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 6G) (CFN-122) Drinking Driver Task Force Re-appointments . Confirmation of the Mayor' s re-appointments of Ms . Karen Minehan, Mr. Richard Manoli and Mr. Rod Blalock to continue serving as members of the Kent Drinking Driver Task Force . Their new terms will continue until l/l/2005 . (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 6H) (CFN-147) Re-appointment to LEOFF Disability Board. Confirmation of the Mayor ' s re-appointment of Councilmember Connie Epperly to continue serving as a member of the Kent LEOFF I Disability Retirement Board. Her new term will continue until 12/31/2003 . FINANCE (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 6B) (CFN-104) Approval of Bills. Approval of payment of the bills received through December 31 and paid on December 31, 2001 after auditing by the Operations Committee on January 15, 2002 . Approval of checks issued for vouchers : Date Check Numbers Amount 12/31/01 Wire Transfers 1095-1101 $ 755, 673 . 84 12/31/01 Prepays & 527326 2 , 467, 562 .45 12/31/01 Regular 527976 3 , 417, 123 . 02 $6, 640, 359 . 31 11 Kent City Council Minutes February 5, 2002 FINANCE Approval of payment of the bills received through January 15 and paid on January 15, 2002 . Approval of checks issued for vouchers : Date Check Numbers Amount 1/15/02 Wire Transfers 1102-1109 $1, 013 , 602 . 01 1/15/02 Prepays & 527977 1, 973, 063 00 1/15/02 Regular 528611 1, 044 , 764 . 31 $4 , 031 , 429 . 32 Approval of checks issued for payroll for December 15 through December 31, 2001 and paid on January 4 , 2002 . Date Check Numbers Amount 1/4/02 Checks 257288-257572 $ 248 , 073 . 17 1/4/02 Advices 122242-122971 1, 040, 959 . 06 $1, 289, 032 .23 REPORTS Council President. Clark reminded Council members of the quarterly meeting of the Suburban Cities Association at the Auburn Senior Center on March 13 . (CFN-198) Operations Committee. Yingling noted that he will be on vacation in February and will not be at the meetings . (CFN-198) Public Safety Committee. Epperly noted that the next meeting will be held at 5 : 00 p.m. on February 12 (CFN-198) Public Works Committee. Orr announced that the regularly scheduled meeting has been cancelled because it falls on a holiday. (CFN-198) r Planning Committee. Orr noted that the next meeting will be held at 3 : 00 p.m. on February 19 . (CFN-198) Parks Committee. Woods noted that the next meeting will be held at 4 : 00 p.m. on February 12 . (CFN-198) 12 Kent City Council Minutes February 5, 2002 CHAMBER OF COMMERCE (CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS - ITEM 11A) (CFN-1170) Chamber Contract. Bob O 'Brien, 1131 Seattle Street, provided a copy of the Kent Lodging Association 2002 Budget, and said that at the December 20, 2001 Operations Committee meeting, the Economic Development Manager asked the City to enter into a $50, 000 a year six-month contract with the Kent Chamber of Commerce Lodging Association, and that the contract was entered into. He said the budget shows that after entering into a $50, 000 contract, the return will be between $16, 300 and $32 , 600 . He said there is no starting point in the contract and the contract can never be evaluated. He said citizens of Kent will pay $10, 000 for the web site, $9 , 000 for a part time marketing representative, $810 for payroll , $2700 in benefits, $1, 000 in training, and $8 , 000 in administrative overhead. He suggested saving the $50, 000 and giving it to the residents of Still Manor. Martin explained that the intent of the lodging tax money is to promote tourism and lodging, and that the Chamber and City work together on economic development goals . He further explained that the hotel owners and operators asked for this tax. Orr pointed out that the tax is not paid by the citizens of Kent, but by those who stay at hotels and motels . She added that that money can only be used for specific pro3ects to promote tourism Yingling noted that he is the Chair of the Lodging Tax Advisory Board and offered to meet with Mr. O' Brien. He also pointed out that the contract is not performance based ADJOURNMENT CLARK MOVED to ad3ourn at 9 :40 p.m. Woods seconded and the motion carried. (CFN-198) Brenda ,7acober, CMC C2ty Clerk 13 ,f '� Y 1 3 t � > t Meetili D � Ps:6ruary 19 2 0a2 a, Cato*,- naent Calen aar f 1 . SUBJECT: 2001 COMP 4REWWSIVE PLAN AMEN(SMWS - ORDINANCES 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Adoption of Ordinanpie No relating to 2001 ComprOherisive Plan Amendme�ts' CPA-2001-2 (A) , CPA-2001-2 (B) , CPA-2001r2 (C) , CPA-2001-2 (E� Cr?A+-2001-2 (F) , CPA-2001-2 (G) and CPA-2001-2 (H) ; adoption ordinance No relating to zoning map changes CPZ-2001-1,, Pi—P 01-2, CPZ-2001-3, CPZ-2001-40 CPZ-2001-5 and CPZ *003:-6; and adoption of Ordinance No. relating to school J"act ', lees. 'these ordinances would: (1) amend the comprehens,.�e plans land use map designations and zoning map designationo of parcels of property more specifically identified in tho ordinances; (2) amend the school impact fee schedule cot �ted in section 12 . 13 .160 of the Kent City Code; and (3) drvh3 Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive P1�* (tPA-2001-2 (G) ) . i r t 3 . EXHIBITS: Ordinances (3) and exhibits re4reAcod therein ; 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Council � (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, tc�) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/P$RSfL IMPACT: NO YES E „ 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $' SOURCE OF FUNDS: I , 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: t J Councilmember moves, Councilmembed seconds, DISCUSSION: ACTION: ;{ ." Council Agenda E6 Item No. 6C ORDINANCE NO, AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, amending the City of Kent Comprehensive Plan as follows (1) to change the plan's land use map designation from Mobile Home Park (MHP) and Medium Density Multifamily Residential, seventeen (17)to twenty-three(23)dwelling units per acre (MDMF), to Mixed Use (MU) for property located at 1027 and 1035 West Smith Street (CPA-2001-2(A)), (2) to change the plan's land use map designation from Single Family Residential, 6 units per acre (SF-6) to Commercial (C) for property located at 27220 154th Avenue Southeast (CPA- 2001-2(B)), (3) to change the plan's land use map designation from Single Family Residential, 6 tuns per acre (SF-6) to Low Density Multifamily Residential, 16 units per acre (LDMF) for property located at 2635 South 260th Street (CPA- 2001-2(C)), (4) to change the plan's land use map designation from Single Family Residential, 3 touts per acre (SF-3), to Single Family Residential, 6 units per acre (SF-6), for property located at 25003-114th Avenue Southeast and 11223 Southeast 248th Street (CPA-2001- 2(E)), (5) to change the plan's land use map designation from Low Density Multifamily Residential, 16 units per acre (LDMF), to Commercial (C), for property located at 13303 and 13307 Kent-Kangley Road (CPA-2001-2(F)), (6) amend the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan to include the Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent and Federal Way School Districts (CPA-2001-2(G), and (7) to amend the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan to reflect a 6-year plan for capital facilities projects (CPA-2001-2(H)) 1 2001 Comprehensive Plan Amendments WHEREAS, the Washington State Growth Management Act ("GMA") requires internal consistency among comprehensive plan elements and the plans from other jurisdictions, and WHEREAS,to assure that comprehensive plans remain relevant and up to date, the GMA requires each jurisdiction to establish procedures whereby amendments to the plan are considered by the City Council (RCW 36 70A 130(2)), and limits these amendments to once each year unless an emergency exists, and WHEREAS, the City of Kent has established a procedure for amending the Comprehensive Plan in Chapter 12 02 of the Kent City Code, which sets a deadline of September 1st of each year for submittal of requests for comprehensive plan amendments, and WHEREAS, by September 4, 2001, the City received applications to amend the comprehensive plan's land use plan map designation, and six of those applications involve parcels located at (1) 1027 and 1035 West Smith Street(CPA- 2001-2(A)), (2) 27220-154th Avenue Southeast (CPA-2001-2(B)), (3) 2635 South 260th Street (CPA-2001-2(C)), (4) the adjacent properties located at the southwest comer of the intersecting nghts-of-way for the Southeast 252nd Street and 114th Avenue Southeast, and at 25218-113th Avenue Southeast (CPA-2001-2-(D)), (5) 25003- 114th Avenue Southeast and 11223 SE 248th Street (CPA-2001-2(E)), and (6) 13303 and 13307 Kent-Kangley Road (CPA-2001-2(F)), and WHEREAS, the parcel at 1027 and 1035 West Srmth Street is currently designated Mobile Home Park (MHP) and Medium Density Multifamily Residential, 17 to 23 units per acre (MDMF), and the applicants are requesting a plan designation to Mixed Use (MU) (CPA-2001-2(A)), and 2 2001 Comprehensive Plan Amendments WHEREAS, the parcel at 27220-154th Avenue Southeast is currently . designated Single Family Residential, 6 units per acre (SF-6), and the applicants are requesting a plan designation of Commercial (C) (CPA-2001-2(B)), and WHEREAS, the parcel at 2635 South 260th Street is currently designated Single Family Residential, 6 units per acre (SF-6), and the applicants are requesting a plan designation of Low Density Multifamily Residential, 16 units per acre (LDMF) (CPA-2001-2(C)), and i WHEREAS, the adjacent properties located at the southwest comer of the intersecting rights-of-way for Southeast 252nd Street and 114th Avenue South and at 25218-113th Avenue Southeast are currently designated Single Family Residential, 6 units per acre (SF-6), and the applicants are requesting a plan designation of Single Family Residential, 8 units per acre (SF-8) (CPA-2001-2(D)), and WHEREAS, the adjacent properties located at 25003 114th Avenue Southeast and 11223 Southeast 248th Street are currently designated Single Family Residential, 3 unit per acre(SF-3), and the applicants are requesting a plan designation of Single Family Residential, 6 units per acre(SF-6) (CPA-2001-2(E)), and WHEREAS, the parcel at 13303 and 13307 Kent-Kangley Road is currently designated Low Density Multifamily Residential, 16 units per acre (LDMF), and the applicants are requesting a plan designation to Commercial (C) (CPA-2001-2(F)); and WHEREAS, the Kent and Federal Way School Districts are requesting amendments to the text of the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan to reflect proposed changes to impact fees resulting from new student population generated by new single-family and multifamily residential development(CPA-2001- 2(G)), and 3 2001 Comprehensive Plan Amendments WHEREAS, the City of Kent Finance Department has submitted proposed amendments to the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan to identify a 6-year plan for capital facilities projects, including costs and revenue sources (CPA-2001-2(H)), and WHEREAS, the City of Kent Land Use and Planning Board considered the requested comprehensive plan amendments, conducted a public hearing of the same on December 10, 2001, and made the following recommendations (1) the denial of CPA-2001-2(A) and CPA-2001-2(D), (2) the approval of CPA —2001-2(B) with conditions on access, (3) the approval of CPA-2001-2(C), (CPA-2001-2(E); and CPA- 2001-2(F), and (4) no recommendation for CPA-2001-2(G) and CPA-2001-2(H), WHEREAS,the proposed amendments of CPA-2001-2(A), CPA-2001- 2(B), CPA-2001-2(C), CPA-2001-2(E), and CPA-2001-2(F) are consistent with the standards of review for comprehensive plan amendments outlined in Section 12 02 050 of the Kent City Code, and WHEREAS, on February 5, 2002, the City Council for the City of Kent approved the comprehensive plan amendment CPA-2001-2(A) to amend the comprehensive plan designation for parcels of property located at 1027 and 1035 West Smith Street, and WHEREAS, on February 5, 2002, the City Council for the City of Kent approved the recommendation of the comprehensive plan amendment CPA-2001-2(B) to amend the comprehensive plan designation of a parcel of property at 27220-154th Avenue Southeast, and 4 2001 Comprehensive Plan Amendments WHEREAS, on February 5, 2002, the City Council for the City of Kent approved the recommendation of the comprehensive plan amendment CPA-2001-2(C) to amend the comprehensive plan designation of parcels of property at 2635 South 260th Street, and WHEREAS, on February 5, 2002,the City Council for the City of Kent denied the comprehensive plan amendment CPA-2001-2(D) to amend the comprehensive plan designation of the adjacent properties located at the southwest comer of the intersecting rights-of-way for the Southeast 252nd Street and 114th Avenue Southeast and at 25218-113th Avenue Southeast; and WHEREAS,on February 5,2002, the City Council for the City of Kent approved the recommendation of the comprehensive plan amendment CPA-2001-2(E) to amend the comprehensive plan designation of the adjacent properties located at 25003-114th Avenue Southeast and 11223 Southeast 248th Street, and WHEREAS,on February 5, 2002, the City Council for the City of Kent approved the recommendation of the comprehensive plan amendment CPA-2001-2(F) to amend the comprehensive plan designation of parcels of property at 13303 and 13307 Kent-Kangley Road, and WHEREAS, on February 5, 2002, the City Council for the City of Kent approved the Capital Facilities Element amendment CPA-2001-2(G) to include the Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent and Federal Way School Districts; and f WHEREAS, on February 5, 2002, the City Council for the City of Kent approved the Capital Facilities Element amendment CPA-2001-2(H) to reflect a 6-year plan.for capital facilities projects; NOW, THEREFORE, 5 2001 Comprehensive Plan Amendments THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS SECTION 1. The City of Kent Comprehensive Plan adopted by Ordinance No 3222, as subsequently amended, is hereby amended to establish new plan designations for the following parcels A For the property located at 1027 and 1035 West Smith Street, from a plan designation of Mobile Home Park (MHP) and Medium Density Multifamily Residential, 17 to 23 units per acre (MDMF), to Mixed Use (MU), as depicted in the map attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated hereby by this reference (CPA-2001-2(A)), B For the property located at 27220-154th Avenue Southeast and legally described on the attached Exhibit `B 1", from a plan designation of Single Family Residential, 6 units per acre (SF-6), to Commercial (C), as depicted in the map attached hereto as Exhibit `B2" and incorporated herein by this reference (CPA-2001-2(B)), with the condition that the subject parcel shall not be permitted to have direct vehicular access to 154th Avenue Southeast to serve any non-residential land use development, C For the property located at 2635 South 260th Street, from a plan designation of Single Family Residential, 6 units per acre (SF-6), to Low Density Multifamily Residential, 16 units per acre(LDMF), as depicted in this map attached hereto as Exhibit"C" and incorporated herein by this reference (CPA-2001-2(C)); D For the adjacent properties located at 25003-114th Avenue Southeast and 11223 Southeast 248th Street, from a plan designation of Single Family Residential, 3 units per acre (SF-3), to Single Family Residential, 6 units per acre (SF-6), as depicted in this map attached hereto as Exhibit"D"and incorporated herein by this reference (CPA-2001-2(E)), i6 2001 Comprehensive Plan Amendments E For the property located at 13303 and 13307 Kent-Kangley Road, from a plan 0 designation of Low Density Multifamily Residential, 16 units per acre (LDMF), to Commercial (C), as depicted in this map attached hereto as Exhibit "E" and incorporated herein by this reference (CPA-2001-2(F)), SECTION 2. The Capital Facilities Plan element of the Kent Comprehensive Plan is hereby amended to include the Capital Facilities elements of the Kent and Federal Way School Districts, as set forth in Exhibit "F"attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (CPA-2001-2(G)). SECTION 3. The Capital Facilities Element of the City of Kent Comprehensive Plan is hereby amended to reflect a 6-year plan for capital facilities projects, as set forth in Exhibit "G" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (CPA-2001-2(H)) SECTION 4. -Severabikty If any one or more sections, sub-sections, or sentences of this Ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect SECTION 5. -Effective Date This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty(30) days from and after the date of passage as provided by law JIM WHITE, MAYOR ATTEST BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK 7 2001 Comprehensive Plan Amendments APPROVED AS TO FORM TOM BRUBAKER, CITY ATTORNEY PASSED day of 2002. APPROVED day of 2002 PUBLISHED day of 2002. I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No , passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the City of Kent as hereon indicated (SEAL) BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK P TmWrdinwcclCo FhnAvend--2W1 doc 8 2001 Comprehensive Plan Amendments /'1 OI c `> a L. •z< N a m .. o O o .�.� 60 « . .0 1A :. o C@m O O A N we C d p c q $ e aE 3i 30 « m z CD N 10 dC1N a > mto c°O � nOm o L C 1 m 6 tOt � CAI% a. 1! $ {OL If1 J A W 0 •� IC ' 61 c Vl Ii J V 1319 e Xcm a Cox C ch > J p p W E F Co E to p o O z U N 3AV z coX cn gwo s a g .- @ cpgcl yV ;?, W fr Ls� as o � zv III 7CD N 3AV NOSMOHI !! X o b p�pgD �Q Z w o z Lill _T o�wyse Cox 13 0 M13 O _ BB S E COX p¢7 ng EXHIBIT "A" Exhibit B1 Lot 6, Edwa11 A. Aask Addition, according to the plat thereof recorded in volwat 53 of plats, page 11. in Xing County, Washington, SUBJECT Tar 1) Easements, restrictions and slope rxghra as discloaed by tht recorded plat of Edxall A Rssk Addition, 2) Notice by City of Kent reoordad under Rec No 9903130989 which is a re-record of Bee No 9712190e M 3) City of Kent ordinance Plc 3447 recorded under Rec No 19991012000146 regarding water supply system: 4) Norzce by Kxng County Water District No 111 A ` W L t T C N V V 0 ca rY o 0 3a 3a w m « � � a o3 02 Dam x w om V L N 1 R CO OY2 " o ° o LLC a C .Z`y VA , 1 m IL0 c D ►y 3 M V 6 z {t. $ LL \If�l .]� U, ' (� C Idld I (C Q a I-ml Vl U U x a �/f cr1 m z 02 ? F � ZOO c 0 Z V zo x g X , tix 4) G �r ZR i x x N 13 .F -,q�R+ 3: ti 3s and t N LU cn All x � 0 ED 8� r a AiLa W x I +x, x ' D. - , '] � R{V xp;a x x E � j xf"r r Trt' b ay a: E EXHIBIT B2 AA .� *Z �% N o ma A A 04 � M ` FAel`o ''° 3m 3u u m to M N mu x_Z m O ro G 10 rcc � a m' 010. S3 yea E � hum. U.Ins a to t� c Q a 1414 to a y Lz ,4 n $ 3H'141 3 -} ` -1 *41 41 IN IN 41-44 4dYl 4dl 41• \ i14141414141`}�-AN 41-N x <�• 14141414!414i 41 41 41 41 4f C nx 41N41,NNN 414141-NN N44 4141 44 4141 414"4141, Q A 4141 41 4141 41 4141 41 41 41 44 T x x N 1I 441 41 41%4A1 41441444 44S414 4414 41444 IN 414 1� ?O Z x VQ444VM414141444 41 41`A41Y141`N41 A41`Hdle x -,e ;ex 4141 }I44%N N 41 4141 414"4i- = O O s; 1414141 414141414141-M 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 4� . z N _- ,�, AY141Y1 414141414141 4141414141414141414r. d 414141 41414♦414141 4141 IN 41 d r2 _ 41 4 � 4141a1 414141 414141 4141 �4141141 Y, ? V �x ;xti � ;ex14141 4t 41IN%N-M 4l4f 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 %N N 414 w sgx --_ `Y `}I.31.34 4141414141 4141414" 414141 414 O 41414141414141414141 41414144%V-A 1 41414141 414 z H414141+4141414141 4i 4t 4141414t 4a 4t -Ni g Nx 14141414I 41 N 47 4141 414141 -N 4141414i 4141`H 4 x '4144,N N%1YI4141,M 4141 a1 IN t 4✓4t 4 4141`H 4 414141414141414141 414141414i 41 a4"14 4 " 'ox 41414141 IN 414141 414141414141 41 4a 4a 41 4 �x H41 4141414141%IN M • 414i 41414141 IN 41-N-N 4l 41 4 ��+ 1 4l41 �N 41414141 IN IN 41 414141414141 414 4141414141414141 4141414i4141 4 O 41414 414141414141 4141414441414141 414141414141 4 V SX OX `H`N41'31'H`N41`N'H 41 41 4141 41 41 4i4141 41414141414141 '}I`H`H 4131414141`N 41 `314141414141414141 414141414141`N4 1A4144 Y141414141444441 4141414"41414141 41414141414 r0. S'A`8`N414141`N�H`H41`H'H 41`H`N`N`N�N41•'N`N41"N 41414191` 1) o •+ �'�114141Y1414141414141414141 41414141`N41414141 4"414"q O 94 44,W N 414141414141 44 4N jw 41 41 41 Z 'NNNH%NN4141 41 4141 4141414141IN%NIN41 41414 c 4! 414141 44 4141 414141414141414141414141 414141 i AU 41 414141 41414141414141 41 IN 41414"4141 IN 4i 4141444 x - _ r Y+'„ Y+ r 414141414141414141 4141 IN �+x 41414141 N4141 41 4141414141 IN UA M4141,M N 4141 4141414 N 1414141414141 41 41-N N-N414 414141414141414♦4141 41414 x - _ -�• - _=;=tea., lI414141414141 41 O 4141414141414i41 41 41 41 41 ' 4141414141°� - � 414141414141 Y 41414141414141414141414141414 8 414141�' 4141414141 4141414141414141414i 414141414 4141' 14141414141 4141414"4i 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 4i 41414 D 1414 141414141 4141414a 414t 414141414141.H 41414141414 11 2x141 141414141 �����`�•, •`.•`.• ag a a d41414141 4141 4141414i 41 41 41 41 4, "v4 a /) 41 41 414141 41714141`y•" 41d1414" $ a 4/ X 4147414 O� N '41 414141:'41414i 414141 !!!!t7 ox x 414141 �41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 4 ' 0 xr�""-"' wx •�41414i�31 V41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 4 0 fox ^x N '�4,41`H4i V31 41 41 41 41 41 41 4 + 4113 41 41 41 41 41 a CD `H4+`H41`H4(`N-N 4 414141 414141414{4 5ati N 41 414141 IN ��`N`HIN IN 1141 + 4 i s Hal EXHIBIT "C" F uj u e C li / CA \ m mISO A to O cV "' a C A m A. ~ N Y Z CLO CA Om Z O • 6 Nam! LLfAd $ {L � {s� NJ 0 ' V L Li = Q I }Id ® C �{. (� V - 1�19 x to it O C a 0 CO y z 00 zn $ b c6 'a a g " -4 s bb � a &0 j W LJ LULLo C O O a 0 - 41 as a a1N�r��t a 41 IN IN IN IN 41 IN 4 m� •` > ll •N11` _ o I�NN� a -NN p ",MIN ININ4 dl•H H dI un 91d1•N w /\1 " H il31 Hd 13 •TY. wA t _ EXHIBIT "D" LL q • L o e o 0 •� � N O % m R A O N .+ O o9 0 3 � o 3 N ` w 4 ri3 Gd ZILL ZIOL IflJ VA ' 0 .5 d d Na m �Ja�Jt Px mx O 0- l 00 3S 3A`d S£L z a c ZOo Nr , �H�191•N 5 w o Op a •N- w OIN U " A`N•31�i YtT`H - `}i 4l dl` O v•3141 d1 d141 d1 d7 J' 31 d141 Q • v,ai,v a. ,• , dl•H•Y �J 0 m NJ 12 Ile, N •�•N 91uj 9191•N•H IN 44 74 cn , "'n Z a.- O E Z V91•N•} 'as• aIx dl dl dl• - 01 � '.L•yl•ll•N Hy '� tt6 2L ¢r 3 ,l ..a i x 66Y all EXHIBIT "E" CAPITAL FACILITIES � PLAN 2001 - 2002 - 2006 - 2007 >f KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 Serving Unincorporated King County Kent, Covington, Auburn, Black Diamond, Renton, SeaTac, Washington APRIL 2001 KENT& FED.WAY SCHL DISTRICTS 4 #CPA-2001-2(G)/KIVA#2012913 (Charlene Anderson, Planner) E F EXHIBIT "F" Kent School District No. 415 Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan 2001 -2002 - 2006-2007 April 2001 For information on the Plan, please call the Finance & Planning Department at (253) 373-7295. Capital Facilities Plan Contributing Staff Gwenn Escher-Derdowski, Planning Administrator Joe Zimmer, Finance Department Bonnie Catton,Transportation Department Clint Marsh, Director of Facilities & Construction Karla Wilkerson, Facilities Department Kent School District Six-Year capital Facilities Plan April 2001 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 12033 SE 25e Street Kent, Washington 96031-6643 (253) 373-7000 SIX-YEAR CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2001-2002 - 2006-2007 April 2001 BOARD of DIRECTORS BIII Boyce Sandra Collins Scott Floyd Mike Jensen Linda Petersen ADMINISTRATION Barbara Grohe, Ph D Superintendent Daniel L Moberly Assistant Superintendent of Business Services Fred H. High Executive Director of Finance Margaret A. Whitney Assistant Superintendent of Human Resources&Special Services Carla Jackson Executive Director for School Improvement of Kent-Meridian Strand Gwen Dupree Executive Director for School Improvement of Kentlake Strand Merri Rieger Executive Director for School Improvement of Kentridge Strand Janis McBrayer Executive Director for School Improvement of Kentwood Strand Gary Plano Executive Director of Curriculum & Instructional Services Valerie Lynch, Ed.D. Executive Director of Special Services Donald Hall E✓=cuti,/ Dcecicror Information TechncicGy Kent Schaal District Sa-Year Capital Facifi6es Pbn April 2001 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 is SIX-YEAR CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN TABLE of CONTENTS Section Page Number I Executive Summary 2 11 Six-Year Enrollment Projection 4 III Current District "Standard of Service" 8 I V Inventory and Capacity of Existing Schools 12 V Six-Year Planning and Construction Plan 15 V I Relocatable Classrooms 18 V I I Projected Classroom Capacity 20 V I I I Finance Plan, Cost Basis and Impact Fee Schedules 25 Ix Appendixes 31 Kent School DmMd Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2001 Page 1 I Executive Summary This Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") has been prepared by the Kent School District (the "District") as the District's facilities planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act, King County Code K C.C. 21A.43 and Cities of Kent, Covington, Auburn and Black Diamond. This annual plan update was prepared using data available in the spring of 2001 for the 2000-2001 school year This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the Kent School District. This Plan is not intended to be the sole planning document for all of the District's needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic Long Range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board Policies, taking into account a longer or shorter time period, other factors and trends in the use of facilities, and other needs of the District as may be required. Prior Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent School District have been adopted by Metropolitan King County Council and Cities of Kent, Covington and Auburn and included in the Capital Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. The first ordinance implementing impact fees for the unincorporated areas was effective September 15, 1993 This Plan update has also been submitted to Cities of Kent, Covington, Auburn, Black Diamond, SeaTac, and Renton A financing plan is included in Section V I I I which demonstrates the District's ability to implement this Plan. This Capital Facilities Plan establishes the District's "standard of service" in order to ascertain the District's current and future capacity. While the State Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines do not account for the local program needs in the District. The Growth Management Act, King County and City codes and ordinances authorize the District to make adjustments to the standard of service based on specific needs of the District. Beginning in 1998, the District standard provides for class size reduction for grades K - 3 from 1:26 to 1.22 students, and grade 4 from 1:26 to 1:25. The District's standard class size for grades 5 - 9 should not exceed 29 students, and class size for grades 10 - 12 should not exceed 31 students. These standards are currently under review by the Board and community pending implementation of voter-approved Student Achievement Initiative 728. (&eseciion m for more specific information) (ccnhm" v.t Schccl Dlstrd Sa-Year Capital Facilitm Plan Apni 2001 Pass 2 I Executive Summary (continued) The capacities of the schools in the District are calculated based on this standard of service and the existing inventory, which includes some relocatable classrooms. The District's 2000-2001 program capacity of permanent facilities is 25,314 which reflects program changes and the reduction of class size in grades K - 4. Relocatables provide additional transitional capacity until permanent facilities are completed Kent School District is the fourth largest district in the state. The actual number of individual students per the October 2000, head count was 26,543. Full Time Equivalent (FTE) enrollment for this same period was 25,237 88 (Kindergarten at .5 and excluding Early Childhood Education (ECE] and Running Start students) The District's standard of service, enrollment history and projections, and use of transitional facilities were among subjects studied by the Citizens' Concurrency Task Force The Final Report of the Concurrency Task Force was approved by the Board of Directors on March 10, 1993 Findings and recommendations of the Concurrency Task Force are di§cussed further in Section I I I of this Plan Our plan is to continue to satisfy concurrency requirements through the transitional use of relocatables as recommended by the Citizens' Concurrency Task Force. The Concurrency Task Force reaffirmed that, as has been the practice and philosophy of the Kent School District, portables are NOT acceptable as permanent facilities. Portables, or, using the more accurate but interchangeable term, "relocatables" may be used as interim or transitional facilities: 1. To prevent overbuilding or overcrowding of permanent school facilities. 2 To cover the gap between the time of demand for increased capacity and completion of permanent school facilities to meet that demand. 3. To meet unique program requirements. Use of relocatable and transitional capacity and specific recommendations by the Concurrency Task Force are further discussed in Section V I of this Plan. Pursuant to the requirements of the Growth Management Act, this Plan will be., updated annually, with changes in the fee schedules adjusted accordingly. Kent Sahcd District Sic-Year Capital Facilities Plan Aprll 2001 Pape 3 11 Six - Year Enrollment Projection For capital facilities planning, growth projections are based on student yield from documented residential construction projected over the next six years (see Tema 2) The student generation factor, as defined on the next page, is the basis for the growth projections from new developments King County live births and the District's relational percentage average were used to determine the number of kindergartners entering the system. (see Table 1) Based on the percentage for 2000, 8.25% of King County live births, together with proportional growth from new construction, is equivalent to the number of students projected to enter kindergarten in the district for the next six-year period. (See Table 2) Early Childhood Education students (sometimes identified as "Preschool Special Education [SE] or handicapped") are calculated and reported separately on a .5 FTE basis. The first grade population is traditionally 7 - 8% larger than the kindergarten population due to growth and transfers to the District from private kindergartens. Near term projections assume some growth from new developments to be offset by current local economic conditions. With a few notable exceptions, the expectation is that enrollment increases will occur District-wide in the long term. District projections are based on historical growth patterns combined with continuing development of projects in the pipeline dependent on market and growth conditions. The District will continue to track new development activity to determine impact to schools and monitor conditions to reflect adjustments in this assumption. The six-year enrollment projection anticipates moderate enrollment growth from new development currently in some phase of planning or construction in the district. Information on new residential developments and the completion of these proposed developments in all jurisdictions may be considered in the District's future analysis of growth projections. Within practical limits, the District has kept abreast of proposed developments. The Kent School District serves six permitting jurisdictions- unincorporated King County, the cities of Kent, Covington, and Auburn. The west Lake Sawyer area has been annexed to the City of Black Diamond and Kent Learning Center is located in the small portion of the City of SeaTac served by Kent School District. (CanGnued Kant Schod Distnd Sa-Year Capdal Faaldm Pan April 2001 Pago 4 I I Six - Year Enrollment Projection (Continued) STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR "Student Factor" is defined by code as "the number derived by a school district to describe how many students of each grade span are expected to be generated by a dwelling unit" based on district records of average actual student generated rates for developments completed within the last five years Following these guidelines, the student generation factor for Kent School District is as follows. Single Family Elementary 504 Junior High 211 Senior High 183 Total .898 Multi-Family Elementary .273 Junior High .114 Senior High 076 Total .463 The student generation factor is based on a survey of 3,352 single family dwelling. units and 2,262 multi-family dwelling units with no adjustment for occupancy Please refer to Appendix E on Page 34 for details of the Student Generation Factor survey. The actual number of students in those residential developments was determined using the District's Education Logistics (EDULOG) Transportation System In 3,352 single family dwelling units there were 1,691 elementary students, 707 junior high students, and 612 senior high students for a total of 3,010 students In 2,262 multi-family dwelling units, there were 617 elementary students, 257 junior high students, and 173 senior high students, for a total of 1,047 students. Kent School District Sot-Year Capital Faculties Plan April 2001 Page S O O to (D O r N M r co r M 0) r N_ 0 CO O r r O 00 0r M r r r ¢) O .% N CC O O r O N O N O N r O Y N Ln a N �y cO r N N N N N N N N cs N r r N m m : f a V 0) co r V) M O GO co ` Y O O c,4 co � r 0 O O r � a) O r N O O O O co an M - Of co) Cd r r N N N N N N N N N r N r 0 Q m O aQ 0) � O O r r N co 0) co r M r CD �v s fi M Co c0 0) O a si7 CD 1� N KI CO °J CD m ^ 4 a0 O O N O r O O (n of 0) co co co N N N N N N C' r r r r r N N W Y a Z co c0 co co °7 r co M r co M co O As O V O co a) c0 tD N 0 4) 0) CO N Lo m tO W O r O C O O 0) T O O) co N � CO r t N O r N N N N N cs r r r r r r N r � o N N r c0 0 0V N N m of r N N N O V Ln m N co O N O M r )n O a) r 0 r N T r a) O a) m m a) 0) O) W m @ m CO O of Nco r N r cs r r r r r r r r r N �` d N E u In :; r of )0 r O M `7 c0 cD Cl) M cO r �f m Q:' O M r r r )n r N a) N v 0) c0 r CO N O d LL O O) CD a, 01 O 0 O O co 0) W co r c0 7 Vt'V 'n C c F r s N co r r N r N r r r r r r r r N m 0) O aO in m O) u7 0) M M M 0) M 01 N N F O '4 Cl) M O f0 M to C O) r -W co O a) M a) r r N .� a r Z 0) N C O O a1 0) co 0? 0) co co c0 c0 M O V W r N cp r r r r r r r r r r r r r N C j ti J c C'7 'u o O r GO N O) r r (p O a) r N O) cp o N f 0 O N r Cl) r r M O r O r O R N aD r Q $ c u U O k O c O O a) 0) G) m a) GO r F. Ln M co O m 2 n N a/ r N N r r �- r r r r r r r Cl) y S F.., W _ n z c r y F < N ,' N o M O 0) O r r )0 N r O c0 O 00 Z Q1 t N N N 0) Ln O CO r NC) CDr 0)O O M Q a) v O) O a) 0) 0? 0) co co r: co cD .r N N C) C u U 0 '3 r < N a) r N r r r r r r r r r r r N )0 u = Q r Y M r )e) r f0 iD M O1 Cl) N N m N m r Y Q U W p) .: 0) � 'Q CD r cO M N N r cO O 1D o N r XXSS 1` U) 2 p) '> 0 )0 CC at a) cO a? OJ P r 10 m < v N N N )n aj r r r r r r r r r r r r r N r Q a Z N ' 41, r - E a` N c ° c W a ` O CO e O N M 'C Cl) N N CM c0 co O) r 0 N W E ° Y O S r O c0 CC r N a) O N N 7 m O f0 O O m to o = O r Q) m r m r r co co )0 v_ v_ e? N N c g y W r o Or co r r r r r r �- r r r r r r N M 0 cccggqyq���;;;; Of 0) <` n e 01 a) r C) T a) N r O Go c0 M M co V M a, a ° U Vx coc W O c0 c0 W r M of )n W O co N r N r r < s) g 0 s co co r r r t0 w Lo in M -e � M N O trr A c 0 �- }^ m m r r r r r r r r r r r r r N r N ? u n y p s; m s co r e r O O M r 0o CO O c0 W O V N W �y H M � r W O M r M M N O r M O cc,* = �: Go c0 r- co )0 t0 of V Cl) c7 'e 'C N M O Im c9 V ip a jr cp r r r r r r r r r r r r r c0 M O r N M c0 O to Ln a r M O n $ 4 m co o N m r r c0 0 v 0) O) co -V O CD t o LL ,r 61 0 -W M N M cq O) 0) V N co vO c h < co c0 y a`ci r ` m r r r r r r r r r r r r r co co 2 u m 4 C m ° S ° y � h � d ° r o co r N co v a 0 r co ol ` ° E = e eLU _ a chi w a a 9 a v v €) ac c ` E E E E E a E E E E e F O 4 3 Y 0 0 0 C7 0 G a 0 0 0 0 ( > c) r s KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.415 SIX-YEAR FTE ENROLLMENT PROJECTION ecTUAL. . P, ">.R , ,:,•O;d. „t;'.. -E-"" C , „T ,e,•'E.4 , >O:.a••.•.N • 2000 2001 2002 2003 2064 200; 2006 tang County Live Births 21,817 21,573 21,646 22,212 21,929 21,750 21,825 Increase/Decrease -155 -244 73 566 -283 -179 75 tindergarten/Birth% 1 8.25% 8 25% 8 25% 8 25% 8 25% 8.25% 8.25% 2 Early childhood Education IM 5 62 67 77 78 79 80 81 2 Kindergarten FTE @ .5 900 890 930 952 939 938 937 Grade 1 2,068 1,966 1,888 1,970 2,015 1,987 1,984 Grade 2 2,015 2,114 2,039 1,959 2,041 2,086 2,057 Grade 3 2,098 2,047 2,171 2.094 2,013 2,094 2,139 Grade 4 2,086 2,105 2,085 2,208 2,130 2.048 2.128 Grade 5 2,251 2,117 2,168 2,147 2,270 2,191 2,107 Grade 6 2,056 2,241 2,157 2,207 2,185 2,307 2,227 Grade 7 2,208 2,121 2,333 2,245 2,295 2,272 2,397 Grade 8 2,033 2,144 2,099 2,307 2,219 2,268 2,244 Grade 9 2,208 2,219 2,357 2,306 2,533 2,436 2.488 Grade 10 2,113 2,118 2,177 2,311 2,260 2,481 2,385 Grade 11 1,770 1.779 1,850 1,900 2,015 1,970 2,161 Grade 12 1,432 1,477 1,566 1,627 1,670 1,769 1,729 Total FTE Enrollment 25,300 25,405 25,697 26,311 26,664 26,927 27,064 W.o Yearly Increase 197 105 492 414 353 263 137 Yearly Increase% 0.80% 0.42% 1,94% 1.60% 1.34% 0.99% 0.51% Cumulative Increase 197 302 794 1,208 1,561 1,824 1,961 Full Time Equivalent FTE 25,300 25,405 25,897 26,311 1 26,664 26,927 27,064 1Gndergarten projection based on lGng County actual live birth percentage and proportional growth from new construdron 2 Kridergarten FTE enrollment projection at.5 is calculated by using the District's percentage of K rig County live births 5 years earlier compared to actual lundergarten enrollment in the previous year (ECE=Early Childhood Education) 3 tGndergaden projection is at 5 FTE although many schools have Full Day IGndergarten at 10 FTE with alternative funding Oct.2000 P223 Headcount is 25,277.Full student headcount including 123 Preschool 6 311 Running Start=26,543 G R O W T H P R O J E C T I O N S - Adjustments for current econo,sic factors For facilities planning purposes,this sir-year enrollment projection anticipates moderate enrollment growth from new development currently in some phase of planning or construction in the district. Kent School District Soh-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 2 - April 2001 Page 7 III Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" In order to determine the capacity of the District's facilities, the King County Code refers to a "standard of service" that each school district must establish in order to ascertain its overall capacity The standard of service identifies the program year, the class size, the number of classrooms, students and programs of special need, and other factors determined by the District which would, in the District's judgment, best serve its student population. This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. Relocatables included in the capacity calculation use the same standard of service as the permanent facilities. (See Appendix A, 8 & C) The standard of service defined herein may continue to change in the future. Beginning in 1998, the District's standard class size for grades K - 3 was reduced from 26 to 22 and grade 4 to 1:25. Kent School District is continuing a long-term strategic planning process combined with review of changes to capacity to meet the requirements of Student Achievement Initiative 728. This process will affect various aspects of the District's "standard of service" and future changes will be reflected in future capital facilities plans. - I Current Standards of Service for Elementary Students Class size for grades K-3 should not exceed 22 students. Class size for grade 4 should not exceed 25 students. Class size for grades 5 - 6 should not exceed 29 students. Program capacity for regular education classrooms is calculated at an average of 25 students per classroom because there are five grade levels at K - 4 and fluctuations between primary and intermediate grade levels (Le, third/fourth or fourth/fifth grade split classes, etc.) Students may be provided music instruction and physical education in a separate classroom or facility. I Students may have scheduled`time in a special computer lab. Special Education for students with disabilities may be provided in a self- contained classroom with a capacity of 10-15 depending on the program. (continued) I s _ Kent Schoci Dmtft Sbr Year Capbl Facld*s Flan Aprd Z07 P:a Zi I III Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" (continued) Identified students will also be provided other educational opportunities in classrooms for programs designated as follows English As a Second Language (ESL) Self-contained Special Education Programs Integrated Programs & Resource Rooms (for special remedial assistance) Education for Disadvantaged Students (Title I) Gifted Education Other Remediation Programs Learning Assisted Program (LAP) School Adjustment Programs for severely behavior-disordered students Hearing Impaired Mild, Moderate and Severe Developmental Disabilities Developmental Kindergarten Early Childhood Education (3-4 yr. old preschool handicapped students) Some of the above special programs require specialized classroom space, as well as music and physical education classrooms, computer labs, etc.; thus, the permanent capacity of some of the buildings housing these programs is reduced. Some students, for example, leave their regular classroom for a short period of time to receive instruction in these special programs and space must be allocated to serve these programs. Some newer buildings have been constructed to accommodate most of these programs, some older buildings have been modified, and in some circumstances, these modifications reduce the classroom capacity of the buildings When programs change, program capacity fluctuates and is updated annually to reflect the change in program and capacity. Current Standards of Service for Secondary Students The standards of service outlined below reflect only those programs and educational opportunities provided to secondary students which directly affect the capacity of the school buildings. These are subject to change pending review for Student Achievement Initiative 728. Class size for grades 7 - 9 should not exceed 29 students. Class size for grades 10 - 12 should not exceed 31 students. Special Education for students with disabilities may be provided in a self- contained classroom with a capacity of 10-15 depending on the program. (continued) Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan - _ April 2001 Page 9 III Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" coomnuedn Identified students will also be provided other education opportunities in classrooms for programs designated as follows Computer Labs English As a Second Language (ESL) Integrated Programs & Resource Rooms (for special remedial assistance) Preschool and Daycare Honors (Gifted) and Advanced Placement Programs Basic Skills Programs Traffic Safety Education JROTC - Junior Reserve Officers Training Corps Variety of Technical & Applied Programs (Vocational Education) i.e. Home & Family Life (Cooking, Sewing, Child Development, etc.) Business Education (Keyboarding, Accounting, Business Law, Sales & Marketing, etc) Woods, Metals, Welding, Electronics, Manufacturing Technology, Auto Shop, Commercial Foods, Commercial Art, Drafting & Drawing, Electronics, Careers, etc Many of these programs and others require specialized classroom space which can reduce the permanent capacity of the school buildings In addition, an alternative home school assistance, choice and transition program is provided for students In grades 3-12 at Kent Learning Center. Space or Classroom Utilization As a result of scheduling conflicts for student programs, the need for specialized rooms for certain programs, and the need for teachers to have a work space during their planning periods, it is not possible to achieve 100% utilization of regular teaching stations Based on the analysis of actual utilization of classrooms, the District has concluded that the standard utilization rate is 95% I for elementary schools and 85% for secondary schools. In the future, the District will continue close analysis of actual utilization I Kent School District Citizens' Concurrence Task Force i The Kent School District Board of Directors appointed a Citizens' Concurrency Task Force, made up of a cross section of the community, to assist in defining the District's Standard of Service To accomplish this task, the Task Force was directed to study Kent School District enrollment history and projections, demographics and planned new developments, land availability for new schools, facility capacities and plans, frequency of boundary changes, and portable (relocatable) vs. permanent facility issues. A meeting for public input was conducted and the Final Report of the Citizens' Concurrency Task Force was approved by the Board of Directors on March 10, 1993. (continued) Kent School District Sic-Year Capital Facefhes Plan April 2001 Page 10 III Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" (oortnued)-- The Final Report of the Citizens' Concurrency Task Force included Findings and Recommendations and provision for the following long term goals A. Seek to reduce classroom utilization rates to allow more flexibility on the building level B Seek to lower average class size from that established for the 1992-93 school year. C Seek to minimize boundary changes D Ensure that new permanent facilities are designed to accommodate portables. 1) to resolve current quality concerns 2) to provide for sites for portables to meet increased demand E Pursue modernization of current permanent facilities to resolve current quality concerns and to provide for additional sites for portables to meet increased demand. F Pursue modernization or replacement of current portables to resolve quality concerns. G Ensure that new portables meet current concerns of quality. H Ensure that all sites for portables be modernized and utilities be installed to meet quality concerns. I The quality of facilities, when using relocatable facilities, is a major concern of citizens of the Kent School District. Use of relocatable and transitional capacity as well as more specific concerns and recommendations by the Task Force are further discussed in Section V I of this Plan. The Task Force also states that it has reviewed and accepted the explanation of methodology and the conclusions reached in the enrollment Forecasting System report and recommends that methodology not be changed without Board I! approval. i KW School Dt&lct Sa-Year Captal FaairNes Plan APnl 2001 Page 11 I V Inventory and Capacity of Existing Schools Currently, the District has permanent program capacity to house 25,314 students based on the District's Standard of Service as set forth in Section I I I Included in this Plan is an inventory of the District's schools by type, address and current Capacity. (See Table 3 on Page 13) The program capacity is periodically updated for changes in programs and the addition of new schools It also reflects the reduction in class size from 26 to 22 in grades K - 3 and 1:25 for grade 4. which was implemented in 1998 The class size reduction received voter approval in the Educational Programs and Operations Levy to continue through 2002. The District is currently reviewing recommendations to meet the requirements of Student Achievement Initiative 728. Since 1997, Kent Learning Center has served grades 3 through 12 with transition, choice and home school assistance programs. It is located in the former Grandview School in the western part of the District in the city of SeaTac. This school was designed and is currently configured as an elementary school. Calculation of Elementary, Junior High and Senior High School capacities are set forth in Appendices A, B and C on pages 30 and 31. A map of existing schools is included on Page 14. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2001 Page 12 I I KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No 415 INVENTORY and CAPACITY of EXISTING SCHOOLS ;,%,,`>£,fe?; ,,,+s •`_:.>'�:a�3x,``.cf;tia,;.,Hsu^`ern>"' •i lk`r - • , v•s;S, ,£. 2000-2001 ' '• Year Y Y �> , SCHOOL oPmee ASR ADDRESS `e Program Capactty Y..i,- ^F3E >3t. .e,.;:r 3a; 't>^.:ix>>�a„2;'.Y•.I�}>nbw�E3$'axr'c4>�•, Camage Craig Elementary 1990 CC 18235.1404h Avenue SE, Renton S8058 485 Cedar Valley Elementary 1971 CV 26SIXTimberl2ne Way SE, Covington 9W42 437 Covngton Elementary 1961 CO 17070 SE War Road, Covington 98M2 518 Crssty od Elementary 1980 CW 25225.1SMh Avenue SE, Canngton 98042 451 Daniel Elementary 1992 DE 11310 SE 248th Stree, Kent NMI 456 East Hill Elementary 1953 EH 9825 S 2401h Street, Kent 98WI 437 Emerald Park 1999 EP 118W SE 216th Street, Kent NMI 475 Fairvood Elementary 19M FW 16WO-14&h Avenw SE, Renton 98058 442 Glenrd9e Elementary 1996 GR 19405-1201h Avenue SE,Renton 118068 461 Grass Lake Elementary 1971 GL 26700.1gist Place SE, Kent 98042 470 Hor¢on Elementary 1990 HE 27541-1441h Avenue SE, Kent 98042 432 Jenlans Creek Elementary 1987 JC 26915-18&h Avenue SE. Covington 98042 Alit] Kent Elementary 19N KE 24700-64th Avenw South, Kent SSM2 456 Lake Ycurgs Elementary 1965 LY 19660-142nd Avenue SE, Kant 96042 570 Wartin Somin Elementary 1987 MS 12711 SE 2481h Street, Kent 9=1 475 Meadwv Ridge Elementary 1994 MR 27710.108th Avenue SE,Kent 9=1 451 Meridian Elementary 1939 NE 2S621-140th Avenw SE, Kent 98042 580 Wlennam Elementary 2000 ML 11919 SE 270th Slreel, Kent NMI 461 Neely-O'Bnen Elementary 19M NO 630D South 2361h Street, Kent 98032 437 Panther Lake Elementary 1938 PL 20831-106th Avenue SE, Kent 98M1 380 Park Orchard Elementary 1963 PO 11010 SE 232nd Street. Kent 95031 494 Pine Tree Elementary 1967 PT 27825.118th Avenue SE, Kent 9aM1 - 499 Rdgeriood Elementary 1987 RW 18030.162nd Place SE, Renton 980.5E 523 Sawyer Woods Elementary 1994 SW 31135-228th Avenue SE,Kent 98M2 499 Scenic Holt Elementary 1960 SH 26C25 Woodland Way South, Kent 98031 437 Soon Creak Elementary 1971 SC 12651 SE 21 Blh Place, Kent NMI 430 Spnngbrook Elementary 1969 S8 20035.100th Avenue SE, Kent NMI 423 Sunrise Elementary 1992 SR 22300.132nd Avenue SE, Kind 98042 SOB Elementary TOTAL 13,184 Cedar Heights Junior High 1993 CH 19610 SE 272 Street,Conngton 98042 955 Kant Junior High 1952 KJ 620 Noah Central Avenue, Kent 98032 $23 - Whson Junior High ISM MA 16400 SE 251st Street. Compton 98M2 815 Maker Jim or High 1970 W 12SM SE 192nd Street. Renton 98056 009 Meridian Junior High 1958 W 23480.1201h Avenue SE, Kanl 98031 754 Northwood Junor High 19M NW 17007 SE 1B4th Street, Renton 98M 961 Sequoia Junior High 1966 SJ 11000 SE 2641h Street, Kent 98MI am Junior High TOTAL 6,043 Kent44endnn Senor High 1961 KM 10020 SE 256th Slreel, Kent 9SM1 1,427 Kan lake Senor High School 1997 KL 21401 SE 300th Streel,Kant 98042 1,632 Kentrldge Sonar High 19W KR 12430 SE 20Bth Street, Kent 9=1 1.311 Kenhvood Senor High 1981 KW 2S800-164th Avenw SE, 0mrgton 98M2 1.301 Semor Migh TOTAL 5,671 Kind Leami g Canter(Grandnew)2 1965 LC 22420 M fitary Road, Des Moines 98198 418 DISTRICT TOTAL 25 314 t Charges to capacity called program changer and continued reduction in K-3 clam we from 2610 22. s Kant Learning Center serves grades 3-12. The building was fomierty known as Grandview Elementary Kent School DrArid Six-Year Capital F=Ues Plan Table 3 April 2001 Page 13 / 7 R f uco 0 E , j § c c e 7rm a _ 2 2 / f � > 7 \ § f % f / / .) - o CD ° ° 0 E { ! / c \gam $ ° ? C / 0 ¢ / , ' ° / U !! !!! a! q u , g 2 He , !� �Zc !f : J 2 , - - ® . ; . , E um ` \ ®f §2 � _ - ! % _ � � \ ; » , � —� ! _ t' $J | \ \ / \ f Z ] fff E : LU ) ) t !J ; 0 r z . . p . . � Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Page a V The District's Six-Year Planning and Construction Plan At the time of preparation of this Plan in spring of 2001, the following projects are recently completed or in the planning phase in the District • Millennium Elementary#30 opened in the fall of 2000 It is in the city of Kent at 11919 SE 270'h Street. • Construction funding for Elementary#31 and Junior High#8 did not receive voter approval A Citizens' Facilities Planning Committee will review recommendations for capital construction needs, potentially to be presented for future voter approval • Junior High 08 was previously planned to fill future needs for trades 7 through 9 The Board authorized purchase of a site for this school east of 124. Avenue SE at SE 286U, Street. That site was determined not to be feasible and the property is for sale • A new site has been purchased at 15435 SE 256i"Street in Covington, but timing, size, and grade level configuration will be reviewed by the citizens' committee Other potential future sites and facilities are listed in Table 4 and shown on the site map on page 17 • Some funding is secured for purchase of additional portables as needed. The sites have not been determined Each of the elementary schools has capacity planned for approximately 540 students each, depending on placement of special programs. Junior high schools are planned for a program capacity of approximately 1,065 students and Kentlake Senior High (#4) has a current program capacity of 1,632. County and city planners, decision-makers and school districts are encouraged to consider safe walking conditions for all students when reviewing applications and design plans for new roads and developments This should include sidewalks for pedestrian safety, pull-outs and tum-arounds for school buses Included in this Plan is an inventory of potential projects and sites identified by the District which are potentially acceptable site alternatives in the future. (See raw@ 4) The voter approved 1990 Bond Issue for $105.4 million included funding for the purchase of eleven sites for some of these and future schools, and the sites acquired to date are included in this Plan. Funding is secured for purchase of additional sites Not all undeveloped properties meet current school construction requirements and some property may be traded or sold to meet future facility needs. Based on voter approval of $130 million in construction funding in February 1994, Millennium Elementary #30 is the last school to be constructed that has received voter approval At the time of preparation of this Plan in the spring of 2001, input is being collected from the community as to the best use of Student Achievement Initiative 728 funds. Since most of I-728 funds focus on reduced Gass size and extended learning opportunities, Board decisions could dramatically alter class size and school capacity. Because of the timing of this report, those decisions will be reflected in the next update of the Capital Facilities Plan. Kent School DiaMct So(-Year capital Faulroes Plan April 2001 Page I5 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.415 Projects Planned, Under Construction, or Providing Additional Capacity Site Acquisitions included ': `�;,"a:"`2's:�,:`y'y'•�**s" fix•`< `a, ' . ," ;�.r �� , ,t qr."�i"• ,x,.�..,, ,. ,,,• <.. ,,y ,:y, u' . "i `<v r•,<Y•r• 3`$.; <>. ;; Projected ,„Projected for ?- SCHOOL / FACILITY / SITE LOCATION T Status Completion Program new I'll ` *.En 'a�'`x`• ,y:,t,p,xrga„ � ,• «s„ :; `:i ,a•cs� ,< 'ie�K<>� t�g:: " ; ' `, �a• £, Date Capacay Growth „ a"-`; Szr`FE'.<fi., N� " ., ik„'�,.,:>x.S.�,,. ,,.. .. , Sew..• ,«w .,. �I Appvnnum AOponrtuY ELEMENTARY I (Numbers essgned to future schools may not correlate wmr number of&.sang schools) Elementary It 31 (Unfunded)' To be determined = New Planning TBD 2 540 75% JUNIOR HIGH Junior High N 6 (Unfunded)m To be determined 2 New Planning TBD 1,065 75% SENIOR HIGH Kentleke Senior High opened In 1997 and continues to provide capacity Additional TEMPORARY FACILITIES Capacity Relocatables For placement as needed New Planning 2001 * 22•31.,en 100% SUPPORT FACILITIES Satellite Bus Facility (Unfunded)' To be determined 2 New Planning TBD 2 N i A Land Use OTHER SITES ACQUIRED Type Jurisdiction Covington area (Near Mattson JH) SE 251 &164 SE, Covington 98042 Elementary City of Covington Covington area (Scarselle) SE 290 3 156 SE, Kent 98042 Elementary King County Covington area West(Halleson) 15435 SE 258 Street, Covington 98042 TBD 2 Clry of Covington Ham Lake area (Pollard) 16820 SE 240, Kent 98042 Elementary 10ng County HorseshoWeewes Lake area(Vilest) SE 332 8 204 SE, Kent 98042 Junior High Kng County Shady Lake area (Sowers,etc) 17426 SE 192 Street, Renton 98M Elementary I(Ing County So IGng Co Activity Center(Nike site) SE 167&170 SE, Renton 98058 TBD 2 King County Change*Prevmm Junior High#8 sda SE 286th Street&124th Ave SE,Kent Bite was determined to be"unbuildable"or a junior high and property is now for sale Notes: m Unfunded facility needs are pending review • 2 TBD-To be determined-Some sites are acquired but placement, timing andlor configuration have not been determined Kent School District Six Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 4 April 2001 Page 16 rx>. 411 T .�r :yc. I: I 1Kewrr.. , �i 3n ni rµ� 2 xtor 1 , T a j2 I \YK.. EYE J S . E lie ,j may`> 1•((YYyy__• J. 091% -116TERSNED i 1 °` • jai 3 �.% f al'� i 1t t _( >> 'D` `.,^' •• , fir -1� 9 •� h ';- ri µ'r 11 Yvl `u� 1 v yv`y^• •4J.i ` I �•'L E j TuJnlaw IC+ ;f'1-'v--� � >. >' •{l:.n" � ILGnf\ �� 1 Lam' 1 • 1/Sis Ldr s.'1�r '!'�,'GK;!� Imo.— �.� ' j/ ' 1\ .. KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 Sites Acquired or Under Construction S = Senior High site J Junior High she !• ' E = Elementary site eJ f ~ X = Support Facility she 21 Map w= rjV County Planning a Crntrnuritty oevelopnlerit Dmmlon E" •'�+ rr .-rtr=t=t?j x r.-r-v�=d Chin-t _ Kent School District Sic-Year Capital Facilities Plan Pape 17 i V I Relocatable Classrooms Currently, the District utilizes 158 total relocatables. Of this total, 87 are utilized to house students in excess of permanent capacity, 63 are used for program purposes at school locations, and eight for other purposes. (see Appendices A a C 0) Based on enrollment projections and funded permanent facilities, the District anticipates the need to purchase some relocatables during the next six-year period. In the Final Report approved by the Board of Directors on March 10, 1993, the Kent School District Citizens' Concurrency Task Force reaffirmed that, as has been the practice and philosophy of the Kent School District, portables (or "relocatables") are NOT acceptable as permanent facilities. In addition to the Findings and Recommendations regarding portables listed in Section I I I, "Standard of Service," the Task Force also listed some specific concerns in regard to use of portables as interim or transitional capacity: I. The quality of facilities, when using relocatable facilities, is a major concern of citizens of the Kent School District [And,] that the Kent School District should consider the following factors and priorities when using, purchasing and modernizing portables A. HIGHEST CONCERNS 0 1. Adequate heat 2. Portable covered walkways, where practical 3. Adequate ventilation 4. Fire Safety B. MODERATE CONCERNS 1. Adequate air conditioning 2. Security 3. Intercoms/ Communication 4. Restroom facilities 5. Storage facilities 6. Crowding / class size 7. Noise 8. Availability of equipment (i.e. projectors, etc.) 9. Lack of water (use bottled water/portable tanks for drain) (Continued) 0 *nt S ftd DsY'.d Six-Yasr Cspbl Fecll es Plan Apnl 2001 P-.S 13 f V I Relocatable Classrooms (Continued) For the purpose of clarification, the term "portables" and the more descriptively accurate term, "relocatables" are used Interchangeably in this Plan as well as in the Concurrency Task Force Report The reports also reference use of portables or relocatables as Interim or transitional capacity/facilities. During the time period covered by this Plan, the District does not anticipate that all of the District's relocatables will be replaced by permanent facilities During the useful life of some of the relocatables, the school-age population may decline in some communities and increase in others, and these relocatables provide the flexibility to accommodate the immediate needs of the community Although the Citizens' Concurrency Task Force has reaffirmed that portables are not acceptable as permanent facilities, they did recommend that portables, or relocatables, may be used as interim or transitional facilities. 1. To prevent overbuilding or overcrowding of permanent school facilities 2 To cover the gap between the time of demand for increased capacity and completion of permanent school facilities to meet ' that demand 3 To meet unique program requirements. Portables, or relocatables, currently in use will be evaluated resulting in some being improved and some replaced Quality concerns will be among those addressed by the next Citizens' Facilities Planning Committee in review of capital facilities needs for the next bond issue. The Plan projects that the District will use relocatables to accommodate interim housing needs for the next six years and beyond. The use of relocatables, their impacts on permanent facilities, life cycle and operational costs, and the interrelationship between relocatables, emerging technologies and educational restructuring will continue to be be examined Kent Sctrod District Sc(-Year Capital Facilrbes Plan April 2001 Page 119 V I I Projected Six-Year Classroom Capacities As stated in Section I V, the program capacity study is periodically updated for changes in special programs and reflects class size reduction in Grades K - 4. As shown in the Inventory and Capacity chart in Table 3 on Page 13, the program capacity is also reflected in the capacity and enrollment comparison charts. (See Tables 5&5 A-6C on pages 21-24) Enrollment is reported to OSPI on Form P-223 on a monthly basis and funding apportionment is based on Annual Average FTE (AAFTE). The first school day of October is set by OSPI as the enrollment count date for the year. Full Time Equivalent (FTE) student enrollment for October 2, 2000 was 25,237.88 with kindergarten students counted at .5 and excluding Early Childhood Education students (ECE - preschool special education) and College-only Running Start FTE's. (See Tables 5 d 5 A-S-C on pages 21-24) A headcount of all students enrolled on October 2, 2000 totals 26,543 which continues to rank Kent School District as the fourth largest district in the state of Washington. Based on the enrollment forecasts, current inventory and capacity, current standard of service, relocatable capacity, and future planned classroom space, the District anticipates having sufficient capacity to house students over the next six years (See Table 5 and Tables 5 A-&C on Pages 21.24) This does not mean that some schools will not experience overcrowding There may be significant need for additional portables and/or new schools to accommodate growth within the District and class size reduction mandated under Student Achievement Initiative 728. Some schools, by design, may be opened with relocatables on site. Boundary changes, limited movement of relocatables, zoning changes, market conditions, and educational restructuring will all play a major role in addressing overcrowding and underutilization of facilities in different parts of the District Kent School District Sbc-Year Capital Facilibes Plan Apni 2001 Page 20 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY TOTAL DISTRICT SCHOOL YEAR 2000-2001 toot-2002 1 2002-2003 2003-2004 1 2004-2005 2005-2006 1 20oe-2007 Actual P R O J E C T E D Permanent Program Capacity' 24,853 25,314 25,314 25,314 25,314 25,314 26,379 New Permanent Construction ' Millennium Elementary#30 461 Junior High#8 (Unfunded)4 1,065 Elementary#31 (Unfunded)4 540 Permanent Program Capacity Subtotal 25,314 25,314 25,314 25,314 25,314 26,379 26.919 Interim Relocatable Capacity MW Elementary Reioratable Capacity Required 375 375 350 450 500 550 0 Junior High Relawtable capacity Required 406 464 754 841 1015 0 29 Senor High Rebcatable Capeury Required 0 0 0 188 279 558 620 Total Releeatable Capacity Required 3 781 839 1,104 1.477 1,794 1,108 649 TOTAL CAPACITY ' 26,095 26,153 26,418 26,791 27,108 27.487 27,588 2 TOTAL FTE ENROLLMENT/PROJECTION 25,300 25,405 25,897 26.311 26,664 26,927 27,064 DISTRICT AVAILABLE CAPACITY 795 748 521 480 444 560 504 r ' Capacity is based on standard of service for program capacity and updated periodically to reflect program changes Z FTE=Full Time Equivalent Enrollment (ie ECE Preschool Handicapped & 12 day Kindergarten student=.5) a 2000-2001 total classroom relocatable Capacity IS 1,767. ° Unfunded facility needs are pending review. Kent School Disfria Sbc-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 Apo 2001 Page 21 KENT'SCHOOL DISTRICT No.415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL YEAR 2000-MOI 2001-2002 1 2002-2003 20032004 1 2004.2005 2005-2006 1 2006-2007 Actual P R O J E C T E D Elementary Permanent Program Capacity 12,307 13,184 13,184 13,184 13,184 13,184 13,184 Kent Leammg Center-Special Program 416 New Permanent Elements Construction Millennium Elementary#30 461 Elementary#31 (Unfunded)" 540 Subtotal 13,184 13,184 13,184 13,184 13,184 13,184 13,724 Relocatable Capacity Required 2 375 375 350 450 500 550 0 TOTAL CAPACITY 2 13,559 13,559 13,534 13,634 13,684 13,734 13,724 FTE ENROLLMENT/PROJEC'nON 3 13,538 13,547 13,515 13,615 13,672 13,731 13.660 SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 23 12 19 19 12 3 64 Number of Relocatables Required 1s 16 14 18 20 22 0 Kent Leaming Center is a special program at Grandview School serving students in Grades 3 through 12. The school was designed and is currently configured as an elementary school. 2 Capacity is based on standard of seance for program capacity and Is updated periodically to reflect program changes. 3 FTE=Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment or Projection (ECE& Kindcrgarten = .5) Unfunded facility needs are pending review. Kent School Distract Six-Year Capital FaaTdms Plan Tab]a 5 A Apr] 2031 r V3 22 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL YEAR 2000.2001 1 2001.2002 2002.2003 200-2004 1 2004-2005 2005-2006 1 2006-2007 rcaUalj P R O J E C T E D Junior Hgh Permanent Program Capacity 6,043 6.043 6,043 6.043 6,043 6,043 7,108 New Permanent Junior High Construction Junior High#8 (Unfunded)' 1,065 Subtotal 6,043 6,043 6,043 6,043 6,043 7,108 7.108 Relocatable Capacity Required ' 406 464 754 841 1015 0 29 TOTAL CAPACITY ' 6,449 6,507 6,797 6,884 7,058 7.108 7,137 FTE ENROLLMENT/PROJECTION 2 6,449 6,484 6,789 6,858 7,047 6,976 7,129 SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 0 23 8 26 11 132 8 Number of Relocatables Required 14 16 26 29 36 0 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for program capacity and updated periodically to reflect program changes 2 FTE=Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment/Projection Approximately 10 Junior High students are served part of the day at high schools for advanced placement. 3 Unfunded facility needs are pending review. April 2001 Page 23 Kent School District Sc(-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 B V I I I Finance Plan The finance plan shown on Table 6 demonstrates how the Kent School District plans to finance Improvements for the years 2001 - 2002 through 2006 - 2007. The financing components Include secured and unsecured funding and Impact fees. The plan is based on voter approval of future bond issues, collection of Impact fees under the State Growth Management Act and voluntary mitigation fees paid pursuant to State Environmental Policy Act. Kent Elementary #27a, replacement for the original Kent Elementary School, was the last school for which the District received state matching funds under the current state funding formula Millennium Elementary #30 is the last school that has received funding approval from voters. Some funding is secured for additional portables Planning for future schools is in progress by the District Citizens' Facilities Planning Committee For the Six-Year Finance Plan, costs of future schools are based on estimates from Kent School District Facilities Department. Please see page 27 for a summary of the cost basis. Kent Schad Dstnct Sac-Year Capital Facliittes Plan April 2001 Page 23 - a o . C Lq L a N =a% o 25 25 N z w M Zg Ln F z C � N -c N Oz j a4 w - la U } ?= = N ? 2 N M $ = o Q m N E _ E m g s N N s M M gYg L N � s s o $ E s M `+ ^CIT L U 40 J < E m < g 8 E O " w m w < eo _ c E S z E z o $ g m ^ $ m y z 3 c z o F- ; € g LU s o m _ i : : F y a m V I I I Finance Plan - Cost Basis Summary For impact fee calculations, construction costs are based on the average costs of the last six elementary schools, and the average costs of the last two junior high schools and the next junior high school. Elementary Schools Cost Average Meadow Ride #26 $6,996,325 Sawyer Woods #27 $6,463,054 Glenrid a #28 $8,032,895 Kent Elementary #27a $10,122,095 Emerald Park #29 $10,957,114 Millennium Elementary #30 $12,027,809 Average Cost of 6 elementm schools $9,099,882 'F'(a"r<is'<.o�k°,�.�3iv$i%<i•< ' ss .`'3 ,3. ,s:<ixi, Junior High Schools Cost Average Cedar Heights $14,488,028 Northwood $17,100,049 Junior Hi h #8 $38,780,438 Average Cost of 3 junior high schools $23,456,1T The site acquisition cost is based on an average cost of sites purchased or built on within the last ten years. Please see Table 7 on page 27a for a list of site acquisition costs and averages The impact fee calculations on pages 28 and 29 include a "District Adjustment" which is equal to the amount of increase that the impact fee formulas drive out for this year. The reasons for this adjustment include: 1) the district's long-term commitment to keep impact fee increases as minimal as possible, and 2) our community's overwhelming support of Initiative 695 Kerd Schad OlsM Six-Year Capital Fadbft Plan A;M X01 P:Z, 27 � e Q u m m F S a o am U M m > -W a co > Go N m a Q a (D _ � �_���pp N Q W m N y m s y 12 IY S 2 H n d1 Q p 0 r w N N N 0 v 0 0 0 f0 W M if1 co �i m N CDN O W N M W ^ R O N O CDM, act N O N m O 1 N R 0 N W n m < r Y n Y! CO M M (o KNm O NWaD M H K VN vW 69 ON H {p to r M 49 K H H K W Q M 0 n w --t O O O O r N M a w n N n N v v M O n a < M O O O O 1 0 0 w H7 M O N v fD M M m t0 M m v M r O L O r 0 W r 0 1 m O V O Lo V) M S n n co co 0 o ci co rn co (o CO P- Ln o m n n r ri U O f0 01 1n I M I COm O n I m w LO Y7 n 0 M M vl e L0 n IV of O p M h N 7 f0 tD M M M m V) O m ,.- w w w N 19 as w tF> O Yi f9 cn W ' C6 W W r m w is a> to is w w v> } O O O O iA M O < O O t0 O O O N O O O N O O O in m o 0 0 �0 co m m n r o n v ^ o v m o r Q' o o ^ V v N v O N 7 N N M � Vl < O 0� O O N R Q '- e- N N M M M of < M C w _ Z V) :E m m m ip U3 N N N N U S 2S Y to N y `daiC N Q SN E 01 N H W o 7 y fPpJl I7 N p] VI C m _ rC py E C O O� Od SC C L Wm4N 'E 0 Y N Y Y C �y U a�i u Y Cb1 U Y � .Q my (> N N N Y Y w Y (Cy w N N w to (E C N 7 m6 Q pQ N f^ N y� �p�+ $� ' G U L W W p A�myy N Q W W W W q7 W W W ap y w a N N (V 4! N _ N V) N N N iy oN N p p p Y V G fn d a W $ W W o tm Z y = ffi Y `o o -cc r a m A L = w E "C13" c 3 m 0) V) 0 IL y :E 2 LL$ KM m C cmc rd C y 0c Ec C W coE m _ c o N E m o W N W w c J > L L c d Lrn e m w ?r °1 E a o m r o °' o o m 'N y o 0 w m o 0 v �j v 'c U 2 N !A = ; U uWi � m Y m C 9 C C C C m m C N d O y co U' Y W m y y fn U Z co N N Y E o 2 N m p 15 ~ LL m = C W > ca KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT FACTORS FOR ESTIMATED IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS Student Generation Factors -Single Family Student Generation Factors -Multi-Family Elementary 0 504 Elementary 0.273 Junior High 0 211 Junior High 0 114 Senior High 0.183 Senior High 0 076 Total 0.898 Total 0 463 Projected Student Capacity per Facility SPI Square Footage per Student Elementary 540 Elementary 80 Junior High 1,065 Junior High 113.33 Senior High 1,650 Senior High 120 Required Site Acreage per Facility Average Site Cost/Acre Elementary (required) 11 Elementary $0 Junior High (required) 21 Junior High $0 Senior High (required) 27 Senior High $0 New Facility Construction Cost/Average Temporary Facility Capacity & Cost Elementary $9,099,882 Elementary 25 $78,504 Junior High $23,456,172 Junior High 29 $78,504 Senior High $0 Senior High 31 $78.504 •See average calculations on Pg 27 Temporary Facility Square Footage State Match Credit Elementary 86.212 Current State Match Percentage 0.00% Junior High 25,256 Previous State Match 55.64% Senior High 21,738 Total 4% 133,204 Boeckh Index Factor Current Boeckh Index $103.34 Permanent Facility Square Footage Elementary 1,460,033 Junior High 743,063 District Average Assessed Value Senior High 849.464 Single Family Residence $192,198 Total 96% 3,052,560 Total Facilities Square Footage District Average Assessed Value Elementary 1,546,245 Multi-Family Residence $61,255 Junior High 768,319 Senior High 871,200 Total 3,185,764 District Debt Service Tax Rate Current /$1000 Rate $2.32 Developer Provided Sites/Facilities Value 0 General Obligation Bond Interest Rate '`welling Units 0 Current Bond Buyer Index 5.07% Kent School DWtnd Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2001 Page 28 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Site Acquisition Cost per Single Family Residence . Formula ((Acres x Cost per Acre)/Facitity Capacity)x Student Generation Factor Sh - Required e Acreage Average See Cost/Aere Fiicildy Capacity Student Factor A 1 (Elementary) 11 $65,213 S40 0 504 $669 52 A 2 (Junior High) 21 $45,694 1.065 0 211 $190 11 A 3 (Senior High) 27 $0 1,650 0 183 $i0 00 0 898 A—> $859 53 Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Single Family Residence Formula ((Facility Cost/Facility Capacity)x Student Factor)x(Permanentrrotal Square Footage Ratio) Crnelruclxxi Cosl Facility Capacity I Student F doe I Footage Rai* B1 (Elementary) $9,099.882 540 0SO4 096 $8,15349 82 (Junior High) $23,456.172 1,065 0211 096 $4,46130 83 (Senior High) so 1,650 0183 096 $000 0 t198 8—> $12,614 79 Temporary Facility Cost per Single Farely Residence Formula ((Facility Cost/Facility Capacity)x Student Factor)x(Temporary/Total Square Footage Ratio) Fecrlay Cod Facility Capaorty j Student Factor Footage Rat* C1 (Elementary) $78,504 25 0504 004 $6331 C 2 (Junior High) $78,504 29 0 211 0 D4 $22 85 C 3 (Senior High) $78,504 31 0 183 0 D4 _ $18 54 0 898 C—> $104 69 State Match Credit per Single Family Residence Formula Boeckh Index x SPI Square Footage x District Match% x Student Factor Boeckh Index SPI Footage " Ddnct Match% Sludenl FaClar D 1 (Elementary) $103 34 80 0 0 504 $0 00 D 2 (Junior High) $103 34 11333 0 0 211 $0 00 D 3 (Senior High) $103 34 120 0 0 183 $0 00 D—> $0 00 Tax Credit per Single Family Residence Average Residential Assessed Value $192.198 Current Debt Service Tax Rate $2 32 Bond Buyer Index Interest Rate 5 07% Discount Period (10 Years) 10 TC—> _ $3,431 44 Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility 1 Site Value Dwelling Units 0 0 FC—> 0 Fee Recap A = Ste Acquisition per SF Residence $8S9 63 B = Permanent Facility Cost per Residence $12,614 79 C = Temporary Facility Cost per Residence $104 69 Subtotal $13,579 12 D = State Match Credit per Residence $0 00 TC=Tax Credit per Residence $i3,431 44 Subtotal - $3,43144 Total Unfunded Need $10.147.67 Developer Fee Obligation -35.073 84 FC=Facility Credit of applicable) 0 District Adjustment (See Page 27 for expianalion) (31,291.38) Net Fee Obligation per Single Family Residence $3,782.46 Kent School District,Sot-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2001 Page 29 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENCE Site ACquistlion Cost per Multifamily Residence Unit - Formula ((Acres x Cost per Acre)/Facility Capacity)x Student Generation Factor Required Site Acreage I A"mge Sde Cost/Acre I Faciity Capacity Student Factor A 1 (Elementary) 11 $65.213 540 0 273 $362 66 A (Junior High) 21 $45,694 1,065 0114 $10271 A (Senior High) 27 $0 1,650 0076 $000 0 463 A—> $465 37 Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Multi-Family Residence Unit Formula ((Facility Cost/Facility Capacity)x Student Factor)x(Permanent I Total Square Footage Ratio) Construction Cost Facility Capacity I Student Factor I Footage Rate B 1 (Elementary) $9,099,882 540 0 273 096 $4,416 48 B2 (Junior High) $23.456,172 1,065 0114 096 $2,41037 B 3 (Senior Hlgh) s0 1,650 0 078 096 $000 0 463 B—> $6.826 85 Temporary Facility Cost per Multi-Faruly Residence Unit Formula ((Facility Cost/Facility Capacity)x Student Factor)x(Temporary/Total Square Footage Ratio) Facility Cost Facility GpacM Student Factor Footage Ratio C 1 (Elementary) $78,504 25 0 273 004 $34 29 C 2 (Junior High) $78,504 29 0 114 004 $12 34 C 3 (Senior High) $78.504 31 0 076 004 $7 70 0 463 C—> $54 33 State Match Credit per Multi-Family Residence Unit Formula BoeclM Index x SPI Square Footage x Dtstnct Match% x Student Factor Boeckh Index SPI Footage Distnct Match% Student Factor D1 (Elementary) $10334 80 0 0273 $000 D 2 (Junior High) $103 34 11333 0 0 114 $000 D 3 (Senior High) $103 34 120 0 0 076 $000 0—> $000 Tax Credit per Multi-Family Residence Unit Average Residential Assessed Value $61,255 Current Debt Service Tax Rate $Z32 _ Bond Buyer Index Annual Interest Rate 5 07% Discount Period (10 Years) 10 TC—> $1,093 70 Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility I Site Value Dvrelling Unds 0 0 FC—> 0 Fee Recap A = Site Acquisition per Multi-Family Unit $465 37 B = Permanent Facility Cost per MF Unit $6,826 85 C - Temporary Facility Cost per MF Unit S54 33 Subtotal $7.346 55 D - State Match Credit per MF Unit $000 TC=Tax Credit per MF Unit $1,093 70 Subtotal $1,093 70 Total Unfunded Need $6,25Z85 Developer Fee Obligation $3,126 43 FC-Facility Credit(f applicable) 0 District Adjustment (See Page 27 for eiyionaticn) ($796 94) Net Fee Obligation per MuitFFaraly Residence Unit $2,329 49 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2001 Page 30 IX Appendixes Appendix A: Calculations of Capacities for Elementary Schools Appendix B: Calculations of Capacities for Junior High Schools Appendix C: Calculations of Capacities for Senior High Schools Appendix D: Use of Relocatables Appendix E: Student Generation Factor Survey Appendix F: Summary of Changes to 2000 Capital Facilities Plan Kent School District sm-Year capital Facldm Plan :y-ra '"'09 r QQ•.��.Q � �y p qq 1p �mp ry � � N O �l [ N m r Epp m yy m 1'1 h tn`1 N frV Crl A fq'f y 01 O ry N y L L J • a — � � � � m Y f � 1O � N � m � m m N r m m 1f1 r � N � f f t N m � f E W L Y d Z e E $ a � w LU 8 � SS 85388S� x85tm888n88S85SE � 8 egg ° W _s _ !a� � y • 0 0 0 $ o $ �Q, o Sj o O $ $ o 0 o N ,m„ r � r $ e o H a o r o a y a 9 Ss W Y • e ? .� O O O N O r N O N O O N N O O O � � � N � N O O O O O H � O !n C W W ♦ Q e � � � r � � n � � f N N n N N N N f O � r y N � N e � n n N 0 r C � �.` 20 -jLU 8 u L S a G � g � v � Yl r m � n m $ � O n r � o .n S A $ ai S'i n gi A g n S m SS � F• C X F O y Y n in n n A n f r A_ y aS •u T n N n 3 N aS n fA � �( $ � f N � f f �I • f � � N f � r � f Y N f f r f ' � Z FS a C 4 W iJ • = E x c e ° d co }} $ a W F d e � m N Q y x � E a � W Q s Q � � � a;33� `uS � n � � � iX � � � � � � � SS � 3 � � S �X n vG n � � � n i•S � y � ¢gam OC vi S Y n $ y IL @ N 5 Z = a e W tr ,• m� �d^ `t U O 3Z W 2 6 Sy d' W w +w I O JJ pp FP S U m a U e L fp .: < � a O � U Zj O W W LL V• (! I 2 6 6 y � y y N m y J 9 3 � ss ¢ W • Y 3 � a � kk y epm N ix V U C pp� s t o = C E�pa 'ss Z m a g Y 3 Td $ W fin W `2�' ri Z 6 d 6 N d' V) m m N e N S a� N n a F g ^E mN yN� Ol 1'1 {y��1 po T •, F O E N 1` m Vn O V w m , m vi z Q 2a yp W s I.- < E' j� E Cm'1 E a4 n n c emp N umi Z gQ W $ O N 9 n =O § a 1Y $ m m 3i 0 3 ri N vvi Cli N W m of U z nn w a0 9*x �p 7 ¢ U c W LL e Rui , m J ' C • eco o Bq p yO N a a Q a m a c O 6 E S 47 H Cjp1$, U V x x tl a > E po p m p - p Yqq ypm e 6 ` W 6 S A.• Cml C O tm'1 N � A 9 L a A Q. 1 m m U m U IL N UU+ a _ ; d W ry' a p "A7 a H ? S y a V W i W • W ' ; OW C E b? t= E 9 vm ~ a o e e = 5 V m r y y N r L * N V uSr O yi 3q m a _ pmf mj VEaR C 6 N N N {O W N N 9C S PI •• ` Q >t B q m M N• m ' N ( W U O y y ' N W U y V n n N $ v m x cr W 52 = r 3 t U O "i E V 8 E S2 y: : m J _ CO LL m m Fa- y_Y Z(/J ,777=ry m W y L3L O N E | o @ ' K ! £ ( § , � LE) — d / / � � � § " ■ , $ LU Z 0 Ix « k S uj § \ \ e be � ! vs \` ° ! i ( s f $ cr . / \ \ 0 k , ) f | \ | � k 2 f ■ ` ƒ , 2 E _ ! ) 2 47 \ \ f J ) 7 $ ; a n (n ry N 0 lN`� N m m 0 0 0 N N 0 f4V N O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 F 0 ^p O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O p � a O m A N Qi m A ry O N OI n m YI n m m m m P m �mp N m r R III O N A ID m O A m m h P m T LL O A A P m N n R W = m m ' pp yf m �J n O N N N N N N N N N N N N G G N N N O O O O r o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o p � o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C W f^OV YO 1[IqAp Y4P O f^O Y P P AS 0P fbm`I Ni(l AA N - , N � fV - NN A fmV A O O 0 0 n n N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C; 4' W o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o p' to N O m Ifl ' m A n A 01 A m N IA b A n pp�, mm N n m N qq � Ol A mm P N m m N m l�l p n A m m A m b O A m m m A A m m P O m A N O m O A O N N m P b b A N m 0 0p 0 0 0 � 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � o o � o � o p r o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c N m ^ N p R f0 N ^ m m fNV p lmY m P fn`1 P N m m (O ^ m (A P {b'1 m m M m Yl m m N C C � O O T. Z mS J J W P N ry P n b m 1fl P O YP1 n n O T R N A ry 7 W o O. A ,� Am ` S S GI N P m N n iLi m n r N U co N m W A �RRRa m m n b ' P Q m m m H b n b A a ' O Q ' m P n m P ^ 0 O .� n ' m ` O ,0 LL ., N F n m P m N O 1Ll A N m ,y .` ,., N m O F O P A N P m n N N S _X LLI (� O C b A A r! b 0 n m O NO N U c N r a W JJ aZ N a W 0U W2 W2 NV W= 2 8 pp ¢ yy❑II 11yy J 0 7 Y W W N N E e 3 r c > CL ¢ d x A O g _ e H F� S LL 2. g ~ $ Y O 0 c_@ U E g G e ¢ ¢ a p q Q p �p' Cy }yaak�� a E g g yyoua c "c i Y LLq E 3 g 4 m V V W W LL LL LL S Y Z Y 6 C m ¢ N IJ1 r!1 N /� 3 3 m� C3 {� Y S -�i N in 4 3 yq m N A P A !1 m N I7 m O N m A A m m fl m 01 m m A w W W �y L L' Appendix F - Summary of Changes to April 2000 Capital Facilities Plan The Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") is updated annually based on previous Plans in effect since 1993. The primary changes from the April 2000 Plan are summarized here Millennium Elementary #30 opened in August, 2000. Property for Junior High #8 was determined not feasible and is for sale. An additional site was purchased and is in the Plan, but grade configuration for that site has not yet been determined Changes to capacity continue to reflect reduction in class size for grades K - 4 as well as annual program changes. Further reduction in class size for Student Achievement Initiative 728 will be reflected in the update for next year. Changes in portables or transitional capacity reflect purchase, sale, surplus and/or movement of portables between facilities. Permanent facility costs have been adjusted to reflect averages of costs for schools built most recently. The district expects to receive no state matching funds for schools in this Plan and tax credit factors are updated annually Unfunded facility needs are pending review. Impact fee calculations include a "District Adjustment" which is equal to the amount of increase that the impact fee formulas drive out for this year. See page 27a for further explanation. Student enrollment forecast is updated annually The student generation factor survey was updated to reflect developments added or deleted and changes in student yield. Changes reflect no adjustment for occupancy. Survey data is included as Appendix E Changes to Impact Fee Calculation Factors include- ITEM Graderrype FROM TO Comments Student Generation Factor Eiem 0515 0 504 Updated in 200.1 Plan Single Family (SF) Jr 0197 0211 Sr 0180 0183 Total 0 892 0 898 Student Generation Factor Eiem 0279 0 273 Updated In 2001 Plan Multi-Family (MF) Jr 0086 0114 Sr 0 063 0 076 Total 0 428 0 463 State Match 0% 0% No change since 1999 Plan Boeckh Index(Cost per square foot) $10127 $10334 Per SPI Average Assessed Valuation SF $175,547 $192,198 Per Puget Sound ESD AV-Average of Condominiums &Apts MF $56,029 $61.255 Per Puget Sound ESD Debt Service Tax Rate $232 52 32 Per 10P0 County Assessor General Obligation Bond Interest Rate 594% 5,07% Market Rate Impact Fee-Single Family SF $3,782 $3.782 No change to fee ImpactFee- Multi-Family MF $2,329 $2.329 No change to fee Kent School District Sol-Year Capital Facilities Plan APPENDIX F April 2001 Page 35 DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE for Kent School District No 415 2001 Capital Facilities Plan Issued with a 14-day comment and appeals period. Description of Proposal This threshold determination analyzes the environmental impacts associated with the following actions, which are so closely related to each other that they are in effect a single action 1. The adoption of the Kent School District 2001 Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan by the Kent School District for the purposes of planning for the facilities needs of the District. 2. The amendment of the King County Comprehensive Plan to include the Kent School District 2001 Capital Facilities Plan as a part of the Capital Facilities Plan Element of the King County Comprehensive Plan • 3 The amendment of the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Kent to include the Kent School District's 2001 Capital Facilities Plan as part of the Capital Facilities Plan Element of the Comprehensive Plans of the City of Kent 4 The amendment of the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Covington to include the Kent School District's 2001 Capital Facilities Plan as part of the Capital Facilities Plan Element of the Comprehensive Plans of the City of Covington 5. The amendment of the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Auburn to include the Kent School Distnct's 2001 Capital Facilities Plan as part of the Capital Facilities Plan Element of the Comprehensive Plans of the City of Auburn This proposal may also involve amendment of Comprehensive Plans of the Cities of Black Diamond, SeaTac and/or Renton to incorporate the Kent School District 2001 Capital Facilities Plan into the Capital Facilities Element of that jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan Proponent. Kent School District Location of the Proposal. �r r 1 The Kent School District includes an area of approximately 73 square mife�'.^TMPI V"D of Covington and portions of the cities of Kent, Auburn, SeaTac and Black Diamond fall-Withp. 31 the District's boundaries, as do parts of unincorporated Kino County. KENT& FED WAY SCHL DISTRICTS CIT!O= KENT #CPA-2001-2(G)/KIVA#2012913 PESUM41'CENTER (Charlene Anderson, Planner) Lead Agency: Kent School District is the lead agency pursuant to WAC 197-11-926 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that the proposal does not pose a probable significant adverse impact to the environment An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under ROW 43 21 C 030(2)(c) This decision was made after a review of the completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency This information is available to the public upon request This Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2) The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date of issue. Comments must be submitted by 4.00 p m , June 1, 2001 The responsible official will reconsider the DNS based on timely comments and may retain, modify, or, if significant adverse impacts are likely, withdraw the DNS. If the DNS is retained, it will be final after the expiration of the comment deadline Responsible Official- F . High, Ex c�tive Director of Finance Ken chool DistnZtNo 415 Telephone. (253) 373-7295 Address. 12033 SE 256th Street#A-600 Kent, Washington 98031-6643 Appeals of this determination are governed by Board Policy No. 9280 which can be obtained from Fred High, Executive Director of Finance, Kent School District No. 415, 12033 SE 256th Street#A-600 , Kent, Washington 98031 and pursuant to WAC 197-11-680 and ROW 43 21C.075. Date of Issue May 18, 2001 Date Published: May 20, 2001 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAC 197-11-960 Environmental Checklist Purpose of Checklist The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required Instructions for Applicants This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or"does not apply " Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations Answer these questions if you can If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a penod of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact Use of checklist for nonproject proposals. Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply" In addition, complete the Supplemental Sheet for nonproject actions (part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "protect," "applicant,"and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "prepares," and "affected geographic area," respectively i A BACKGROUND 1 Name of proposed project, if applicable. The adoption of a six-year Capital Facilities Plan by the Kent School District The Comprehensive Plans of King County, City of Kent, City of Covington, City of Auburn and possibly Cities of Renton, SeaTac and Black Diamond have been and/or will be amended to include the Kent School District 2001 Capital Facilities Plan in the Capital Facilities Plan Element of each jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan, A copy of the District's Plan is available for review in the District Finance & Planning Department 2 Name of applicant Kent School District No 415 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person, Kent School District No. 415 12033 SE 256th Street # A-600 Kent, WA 98031-6643 Contact Person. Fred H High, Executive Director of Finance if Telephone: (253) 373-7295 4. Date checklist prepared- May 3, 2001 5. Agency requesting checklist Kent School District No 415 6 Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): The 2001 Kent School District Capital Facilities Plan is scheduled to be adopted in June, 2001 and forwarded to King County, City of Kent, City of Covington, City of Auburn, City of Black Diamond, City of Renton, and City of SeaTac for possible inclusion in each jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan. The Capital Facilities Plan will be updated annually. Site-specific projects have been or will be subject to project-specific environmental review. 7 Do you have any plans for future additions, expa°isiort, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. The Capital Facilities Plan proposes the construction of two elementary schools and . one junior high school 2 8 List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal The above-referenced projects will undergo environmental review at the time of formal proposal 9, Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain No The proposed projects are pending review by the Board of Directors and have not yet received voter approval 10 List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known King County and Cities of Kent, Covington and Auburn will review and approve the Capital Facilities Plan for the purposes of impact fee ordinances and will adopt the Plan as an amendment to the Capital Facilities Plan element of the King County and Cities of Kent, Covington and Auburn Comprehensive Plans Cities of Black Diamond, SeaTac and Renton may also review and approve the Capital Facilities Plan for the purposes of any school impact fee ordinances and may adopt the Plan as an amendment to the Capital Facilities Plan element of their Comprehensive Plans 11. Give a brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) This is a non-project action This proposal involves the adoption of the Kent School District 2001 Capital Facilities Plan for the purpose of planning the facilities needs of the Distinct and for inclusion in the Capital Facilities Plan element and possible amendment of the Comprehensive Plans for King County, City of Covington, City of Kent, City of Auburn, City of SeaTac, City of Renton and City of Black Diamond. A copy of the Capital Facilities Plan may be viewed at the District's Finance Department office 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundanes of the site(s) Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The 2001 :apital Facilities Plan will affect the Kent School District. The District includes an area of approximately 73 square miles. The City of Covington, and portions of the Cities of Kent, Auburn, SeaTac and Black Diamond and parts of unincorporated King County fall within the District's boundaries. 3 B ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1 Earth a General description of the site (circle one) Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other The Kent School District is comprised of a variety of topographic land forms and gradients, including all of those listed. Specific topographic characteristics will be identified during the planning and permit process for each capital project b What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)'? Specific slope characteristics will be identified during the planning and permit process for each capital project c What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland Specific soil types will be identified during the planning and permit process for each capital project d Are there surface indications or history of unstable sods in the immediate vicinity'? If so, describe Unstable soils may exist within the Kent School District Specific sod limitations on individual project sites will be identified at the time of environmental review. e Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed Indicate source of fill, Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be subject to project- specific environmental review and local approval at the time of proposal Proposed grading projects, as well as the purpose, type, quantity, and source of fill materials will be identified as appropriate to each project f Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe It is possible that erosion could occur as a result of construction projects currently proposed in the Capital Facilities Plan. Individual projects and their erosion impacts will be evaluated on a site-specific basis Individual projects will be subject to environmental review and local approval on the time of proposal g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings?) Percentage of impervious cover will vary with each capital facilities project and will be addressed during project-specific environmental review 4 h Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any Erosion potential on individual project sites will be addressed during project-specific environmental review, Relevant erosion reduction and control requirements will be met 2 Air a What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i a., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known, Various emissions, many construction-related, may result from individual projects Air-quality impacts will be evaluated during project-specific environmental review Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. b Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe Off-site sources and necessary mitigation will be addressed during project-specific environmental review c Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any- Plans for individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject to environmental review and relevant local approval processes, including obtaining of any necessary air quality permits, at the time individual projects are formally proposed. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions 3 Water a Surface 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into There is a network of surface water bodies within the Kent School District The surface water regimes and flow patterns have been or will be researched and incorporated in the design of each individual project. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans Some projects may require work near these described waters Individual projects in the Capital Facilities Plan will be subject to environmental review and local approval requirements at the time the project is formally proposed s 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected Indicate the source of fill material Information with respect to placement or removal of fill or dredge material will be addressed at the time of project-specific environmental review Applicable local regulations have been or will be satisfied 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions'2 Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known Any surface water withdrawals or diversions have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain) If so, note location on the site plan Each capital facilities project, if located in a floodplain area, will be required to meet applicable local regulations for flood areas 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge Specific information regarding discharges of waste materials, if any, will be addressed during project-specific environmental review. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions b Ground. 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may impact ground water resources Each project will be evaluated during project-specific environmental review Applicable local regulations have been or will be satisfied. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . ., agricultural, etc). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be 'served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve Impacts of discharged waste material, if any, have been or will be addressed during site-specific, project-level environmental review 6 c Water Runoff(including storm water) 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known) Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into otherwaters? If so, describe Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may have varying storm water runoff consequences Each project will be subject to environmental review and applicable local regulations 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? if so, generally describe Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will have varying environmental impacts and will be subject to appropriate review and local regulations prior to construction. Information regarding waste materials will be presented at the time of such review Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Specific measures to reduce or control runoff impacts have been or will be developed on a project-specific basis in cooperation with the appropriate jurisdiction 4. Plants, a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site deciduous tree alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation There are various vegetative zones within the Kent School District. An inventory of species has been or will be produced as part of project-specific environmental review. b What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Impacts on vegetation will be determined at the time of project-specific environmental review at the time the project is formally proposed Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 7 c List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site Specific impacts to these species from individual projects has been or will be determined at the time of project proposal and will be addressed during site-specific, project-level environmental review. d Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be subject to environmental review and local approval at the time of project proposal 5. Animals• a Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site, birds hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other- fish bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other An inventory of species observed on or near sites has been or will be developed during project-specific environmental review b List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site Specific impacts to these species from individual protects will be determined at the time of project proposal and will be reviewed in cooperation with the affected jurisdictions. c Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Impacts on migration routes, if any, will be addressed during site-specific, project- level environmental review. d Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Appropriate measures to preserve or enhance wildlife have been or will be determined at the time of site-specific, project-level environmental review. 6 Energy and Natural Resources a What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc The State Board of Education requires a life-cycle cost analysis of all heating, lighting, and insulating systems prior to allowing specific projects to proceed Energy needs will be decided at the time of specific engineering and site design planning Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions b Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe Individual projects of this Capital Facilities Plan will be evaluated as to their impact on the solar potential of adjacent projects during environmental review c What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any Energy conservation measures will be considered at the project-specific design phase and environmental review. 7 Environmental Health a Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any. Proposed projects will comply with all current codes, standards, and rules and regulations. Individual projects have been or will be subject to environmental review and local approval at the time of formal submittal b Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? A variety of noises exist within the Kent School District. Specific noise sources have been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review. 9 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example. traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site Normal construction noises would exist on a short-term basis during school construction. There could be an increase in traffic or operations-related noise which would be addressed during project specific environmental review Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions, 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any Project noise impacts have been or will be evaluated and mitigated during the project-specific environmental review. Each project is or will be subject to applicable local regulations 8 Land and Shoreline Use• a What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? There are a variety of land uses within the Kent School District, including residential, commercial, industrial, institutional, utility, agricultural, forestry, open space, recreational, etc. b Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe This question will be addressed during site-specific, project-level environmental review. c Describe any structures on the site Structures located an proposed sites have been orwill be identified and described during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. d Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Structures to be demolished, if any, will be identified as part of the project-specific environmental review process e What is the current zoning classification of the site? There are a variety of zoning classifications within the Kent School District. Site specific zoning information has been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? An inventory of comprehensive plan designations has been or will be completed during project-specific environmental review. 20 g If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site'? Shoreline master program designations have been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review h Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area's If so, specify Environmentally sensitive areas, if any, will be identified during project-specific environmental review. i Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project This information has been or will be provided at the time of project-specific environmental review. j Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? It is not anticipated that proposed projects will displace any people Displacement of people, if any, will be evaluated during project-specific environmental review k Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any . Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be subject to project- specific environmental review and local approval at the time the project is formally proposed I Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any Compatibility of the proposal and specific projects with existing uses and plans have been or will be assessed as part of the comprehensive planning process and during project-specific environmental review. 9. Housing a Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing No housing units would be provided b Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing Any impact of project proposals on existing housing have been or would be evaluated during project-specific environmental review procedures it c Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any Measures to reduce or control any housing impacts have been or will be addressed during site-specific, project-level environmental review, 10 Aesthetics a What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building matenal(s) proposed? Aesthetic impacts have been or will be determined at the time of site-specific, project-level environmental review b What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Aesthetic impacts have been or will be determined at the time of site-specific, project-level environmental review. c Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any. Appropriate measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts have been or will determined at the time of project-specific environmental review. 11, Light and Glare- - a What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Light or glare impacts have been or will be determined at the time of project-specific environmental review b Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Light or glare impacts have been or will be determined at the time of project-specific environmental review, c What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Off-site sources of light or glare have been or will be evaluated at the time of project specific environmental review. d Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any- Mitigation of light and glare impacts has been or will be addressed during project- specific environmental review. 12 Recreation a What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? There are a vanety of formal and informal recreational facilities within the Kent School District b Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses'7 If so, describe Recreational impacts have been or will be addressed dunng project specific environmental review Projects in the Capital Facilities Plan may enhance recreational opportunities and uses. c Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any, Any adverse effects on recreation stemming from individual project proposals have been or will be subject to mitigation dunng the environmental review procedure A school site usually provides recreational facilities to the community in the form of additional play fields and gymnasiums 13 Historic and Cultural Preservation- a Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. The existence of historic and cultural resources will be determined at the time of project-specific environmental review b Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of histonc, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site An inventory of historical sites has been or will be conducted as part of project specific environmental review c Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any- Appropriate measures have been or will be proposed on a project-specific basis. 14. Transportation a Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Impact on public streets and highways has been or will be assessed during project- specific environmental review 13 b Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop' The relationship between specific projects and public transit has been or will be assessed during project-specific environmental review c How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project elimmate*7 An inventory of parking spaces and the impacts of specific projects on parking spaces has been or will be conducted during project-specific environmental review d Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private) The development of new schools may require new access roads or streets, This issue will be fully addressed during project-specific environmental review e Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of} water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe Use of water, rail or air transportation has been or will be addressed during site- specific, project-level environmental review. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project'? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur Each project proposal has been or will be separately evaluated as to traffic impacts. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any. Mitigation of impacts on transportation has been or will be addressed during project- specific environmental review. 15 Public Services a Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. The District does not anticipate that the projects identified in the Capital Facilities Plan will substantially increase the need for other public services Impacts have been or will be evaluated on a project-specific basis b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Schools are built with automatic security systems, fire alarms, smoke alarms, heat sensors and sprinkler systems. 14 16. Utilities a Circle utilities currently available at the site electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. Utilities available at project sites have been or will be identified during project specific environmental review b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed Utility revisions and construction needs will be identified during protect-specific environmental review. C SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision Signature 7 Fred gh.Executive Di or of Finance Date Submitted May 18, 2001 is D SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented Respond briefly and in general terms 1 How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water, emissions to air, production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances, or production of noise? To the extent this Plan makes it more likely that school facilities will be constructed, and/or renovated or remodeled, some of these environmental impacts will be more likely Additional impermeable surfaces, such as roofs, parking lots, sidewalks, access roads and playgrounds will increase storm water runoff, which could enter surface or groundwater Emissions to air could result from heating systems, emergency generators and other equipment, and from additional car and bus trips to and from the school for students and faculty Any emissions resulting from this Plan should not require the production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances, with the possible exception of storage of diesel fuel or gasoline for emergency generating equipment. Noise may result from additional traffic and from concentrating several hundred children at a new facility, especially before and after school and during recesses To the extent this proposal allows additional residential development to occur, these impacts would also increase somewhat, but it is not possible to quantify those impacts at this time The impacts would depend on the type, location and distribution of housing, for example, whether single or multiple family and the location of the school Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are Facilities implementing the Plan have been or will be evaluated at the project specific level and impacts will be mitigated accordingly Storm water detention and runoff will meet applicable County and/or City requirements and, depending on the date of actual construction, may be subject to a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ("NPDES") permitting requirements. Discharges to air will be minimal, and will meet any applicable requirements of the Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Authority. Fuel oil will be stored according to local and state requirements. 16 2 How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or manne life? The Plan itself will have no impact on these elements of the environment Depending on the particular site, construction of facilities may require clearing sites of plants and loss of animal habitat To the extent residential development is allowed, additional area may be cleared and eliminated as habitat for animals There are not likely to be any impacts on fish or marine life, although some water quality degradation in streams and rivers could occur due to increased residential development These impacts have been or will be addressed in more detail during project-specific environmental review when appropriate Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are Individual projects will be evaluated and mitigated appropriately on a project-specific basis, but specific mitigation proposals cannot be identified at this time 3 How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources Any actual projects resulting from this Plan would consume heating fuel and electrical energy Increased traffic resulting from the construction of additional facilities would consume petroleum based fuels Reduced traffic resulting from construction of another neighborhhood school may also reduce amounts of fuel consumed, but it is not possible to quantify such reduction in consumption at this • time These impacts have been or will be addressed in more detail during project- specific environmental review when appropriate Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are Facilities would be constructed in accordance with applicable energy efficiency standards 4 How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? The Plan and facilities constructed pursuant to the Plan should have no impact on these resources. It is not possible to predict whether other development made possible by this Plan would affect sensitive areas Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are No specific measures are being proposed at this time. Appropriate measures have been or will be proposed during project-specific review Annual updates of this Plan will be coordinated with King County, Cities of Kent, Covington, Auburn, SeaTac, Renton and Black Diamond as part of the Growth Management Act process, one of 49 the purposes of which is to protect environmentally sensitive areas To the extent the School Distncfs facilities planning process is part of the overall growth management planning process, these resources are more likely to be protected 17 5 How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? The Plan will not have any impact on land or shoreline use that is incompatible with existing comprehensive plans, land use codes, or shoreline management plans Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are None are proposed at this time. Actual facilities constructed to implement the Plan will be sited and constructed to avoid or reduce land use impacts 6 How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utdities'� This proposal should not create substantial new demands for transportation The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may create an increase in traffic near new District facilities but also reduce traffic by creating the opportunity for more students to walk to a closer school. The construction of the facilities included in the Capital Facilities Plan may result in minor increases in the demand for public services and utilities, such as fire and police protection, and water, sewer, and electric utilities None of these impacts are likely to be significant The impacts on - transportation and public services and utilities of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be addressed during project-level review when appropriate Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are No measures to reduce or respond to such demands are proposed at this time 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. The Kent School District Capital Facilities Plan will not conflict with any laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. is i 1 Federal Way School District No. 210 I 1 2001 /02 Capital Facilities Plan 1 � i Buildin or the -21 St - _C--entu Building for yy----- -- KENT & FED. WAY SCHL DISTRICTS ; #CPA-2001-2(G)/KIVA#2012913 (Charlene Anderson, Planner) FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2001/02 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2001/02 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN BOARD OF EDUCATION Audrey Germanis Linda Hendrickson Charles Hoff Ann Murphy Jim Storvick SUPERINTENDENT Thomas R Murphy FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2001/02 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS u INTRODUCTION ni-v SECTION 1 THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Introduction 1 Inventory of Educational Facilities 2 Inventory of Non-Instructional Facilities 3 J Needs Forecast - Existing Facilities 4 Needs Forecast - New Facilities 5 Six Year Finance Plan 6 SECTION 2 MAPS OF DISTRICT BOWi DARIES Introduction 7 Map- Elementary Boundaries 8 ] Map - Junior High Boundaries 9 1 Map - Senior Hi.gh Boundaries 10 SECTION 3 SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION Introduction 11 Building Capacities 12-13 Portable Locations 14-15 Student Forecast 16-18 Capacity Summaries 19-23 King County Impact Fee Calculations 24-26 SECTION 4 - -SUMMARY OF CHANGES FROM THE 1999/00 PLAN 27-29 ii FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2001/02 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN INTRODUCTION In response to the requirements of the State of Washington Growth Management Act (SHB 2929 (1990) and ESHB 1025 (1991)), and under the School Impact Fee Ordinances of King County Code 21A, City of Federal Way Ordinance No 95-249 effective December 21, 1995 as amended, and the City of Kent Ordinance No 3260 effective March 1996, Federal Way Public Schools has updated its 1999/00 Capital Facilities Plan as of May 2001 This Plan has been adopted by King County, the City of Kent and the City of Federal Way and is incorporated in the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction by reference This plan is also included in the Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each } jurisdiction To date, the City of Des Moines has not adopted a school impact fee ordinance The Growth Management Act requires the County to designate Urban Growth areas within which urban growth can be encouraged The Growth Management Planning Council adopted and recommended to the King County Council four Urban Growth Area Line Maps with designations for urban centers. A designation was made within the Federal Way planning area, which encompasses Federal Way Public Schools boundaries King County will encourage and actively support the development of Urban Centers to meet the region's need for housing, jobs, services, culture and recreation. This Plan's estimated population growth is prepared with this underlying assumption This Capital Facilities Plan will be used as documentation for any jurisdiction, which requires its use to meet the needs of the Growth Management Act This plan is not intended to be the sole planning tool for all of the District needs. The District may prepare interim plans consistent with Board policies. Additional plans will be consistent with the six year Capital Facilities Plan M FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2001/02 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN INTRODUCTION (continued) On October 12, 1998 the Board of Education approved a recommendation to move to a Pre K-5 elementary, 6-8 middle school, and 9-12 high school grade configuration beginning in the fall of 2003 or as additional high school space allows This grade configuration is believed to be more responsive to student needs It will allow for smaller elementary enrollments with room for lower primary class sizes The middle school allows two-year preparation for the WA State Vh grade test, matches the Federal Way 'i Public Schools 8`s grade gateway test, and matches most western Washington districts Middle schools are also thought to be a better way to address the needs of adolescents in a period of transition from elementary to school to high school The four-year high school plan combines the 9-12 graduation credit system, allows two-year preparation for the 10 s grade test, and physically places the high school students together. f Federal Way Public Schools must meet the needs of a growing student and community f population The District must be flexible with building, programs and staffing to meet the I needs of the 2151 Century, while being financially responsible and sensitive to the current tax rates A flexible, cost effectiN e and educationally beneficial approach that integrates academics and high tech/high skill preparation is needed By extending the existing debt 1 and creatively using new and existing facilities, the District can meet these complex needs with no increase, on average, in local tax rates ` Federal Way citizens approved a bond proposal of$83 million in September 1999. This !! bond will provide for a comprehensive high school ($44 million), a middle school (S17 million), expansion and improvement of existing schools (S9 million), replacement of Truman High School (S6 rrullion) and other general improvements ($7 million). Additional planned improvements included in the bond proposal are- parking and pedestrian safety, playgrounds and sports fields, new classroom start-up and music equipment, information systems and networks and emergency communications. Planned opening for the new high school is September 2003 Truman High School will open in the same year. There is a study in progress to determine if the new high school will open with all grade levels or if seniors will have an option to stay at the current high school for the 2003/04 school year This proposal will affect capacity at the existing three high schools If recommended, this capacity change will be reflected in the Capital Facilities Plan for the 2003/04 school year. Federal Way Public Schools opened the Internet Academy in the 1996/97 school year. This program currently serves approximately 577 students, 441 are full-time students. Internet Academy has grown from about 60 students to the current 577 in four years. The forecast for this school has been reduced from previous projections, as historical growth has not been a reliable tool to forecast this enrollment A conservative projection using current numbers is included in this Plan. Internet Academy is currently operating out of leased space consisting of administrative areas and a computer lab area. This capacity is not included in the analysis of instructional spaces The facility needs are unique to a program of"distance learners". iv y FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2001/02 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Federal Way Public Academy opened in the 1999/00 school year in six portables on the Mahee Junior High site Two additional portables were added for opening the 2000/01 school year to expand the program to include ninth grade students The school served 180 seventh, eight and ninth grade students this year and will serve 180—210 students in grades seven, eight and nine in the 2001/2002 school year. v FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 1 - THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN The State Growth Management Act requires that several pieces of information be gathered to determine the facilities available and needed to meet the needs of a growing community This section provides information about current facilities, existing facility needs, and expected future facility requirements for Federal Way Public Schools This is followed by a Financial Plan which shows expected funding for any new construction, portables and modernization Iisted 1 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2001/02 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN INVENTORY OF EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS Adelaide 1635 SW 304th Street Federal Way 98023 Bngadoon 3601 SW 336th Street Federal Way 98023 Camelot 4041 S 298th Street Auburn 98001 Enterprise 35101 5th Avenue SW Federal Way 98023 Green Gables 32607 47th Avenue SW Federal Way 98023 Lake Dolloff 4200 S 308th Street Auburn 98001 Lake Grove 303 SW 308th Street Federal Way 98023 Lakeland 35675 32nd Avenue S Auburn 98001 Mark Twain 2450 S Star Lake Road Federal Way 98003 Meredith Hill 5830 S 300th Street Auburn 98001 Mirror Lake 625 S 314th Street Federal Way 98003 Nautilus 1000 S 289th Street Federal Way 98003 Olympic View 2626 SW 327th Street Federal Way 98023 Panther Lake 34424 1st Avenue S Federal Way 98003 Rainier View 3015 S 368th Street Federal Way 98003 Sherwood Forest 34600 12th Avenue SW Federal Way 98023 Silver Lake 1310 SW 325th Place Federal Way 98023 Star Lake 4014 S 270th Street Kent 98032 Sunnycrest 24629 42nd-Avenue S Kent 98032 Twin Lakes 4400 SW 320th Street Federal Way 98023 Valhalla 27847 42nd Avenue S Auburn 98001 Wildwood 2405 S 300th Street Federal Way 98003 Woodmont 26454 16th Avenue S Des Moines 98198 JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS Federal Way Public Academy 36001 Is`Ave S Federal Way 98003 j Illahee 36001 1st Avenue S Federal Way 98003 -- Kilo 4400 S 308th Street Auburn 98001 Lakota 1415 SW 314th Street Federal Way 98023 Sacalawea 1101 S Dash Point Road Federal Way 98003 Saghahe 33914 19th Avenue SW Federal Way 98023 Totem 26630 40th Avenue S Kent 98032 SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS Decatur 2800 SW 320th Street Federal Way 98023 Federal Way 30611 16th Avenue S Federal Way 98003 Thomas Jefferson 4248 S 288th Street Auburn 99001 ALTERNATIVE SCHOOLS Merit School 31455 28th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Harry S Truman High School 31455 28th Ave S Federal Way 98003 LEASED SPACE Internet Academy 32020 15`Ave S Federal Way 98003 2 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2001/02 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CURRENT INVENTORY NON-INSTRUCTIONAL FACILITIES Developed Property Administrative Buildin; 31405 18th Avenue S Federal Way 98003 MOT Site 1066 S 320th Street Federal Way 98003 Central Kitchen 1344 S 308th Street Federal Way 98003 Federal Way Memorial Field 1300 S 308th Street Federal Way 98003 Leased Space Community Resource Center 1928 S Sea Tac Mall Federal Way 98003 ECEAP Offices 30819 14`h Ave S Federal Way 98003 Undeveloped Property Site # Location 23 SW 360th Street & 3rd Avenue SW S 351st Street & 52nd Avenue S It E of loth Avenue SW Between SW 334th & SW 335th Streets 63 E of 47th Avenue SW & SW 314th Place 71 S 344th Street &46th Avenue S 72 36600 block of Pacific Hi.ghway S 84 3737 S 360th Street 85 16`h Ave S and S 3641h Way 96 S 308th Street & 14th Avenue S Notes: Not all undeveloped properties are large enough to meet school construction requirements Properties may be traded or sold depending on what locations are needed to house students in the District. 3 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2001/02 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN NEEDS FORECAST - EXISTING FACILITIES EXISTING FACILITY FUTURE NEEDS ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF FUNDS Truman High School Replacement with expansion (1) Purchase and Relocate Interim Capacity (2) Portables Decatur High School, Federal Expansion (1) Way High School and Thomas Jefferson High School Various School Saes Parking Safety, Network (3) Upgrades, Automated Libraries, Elementary Playgrounds, High l School Sports Fields, i - Emergency Communications. Notes: (1) Anticipated source of funds is currently authorized bond issues (2) Anticipated source of funds is Impact Fees ] (3) Anticipated source of funds is future bond issues I l 4 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2001/02 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN NEEDS FORECAST - NEW FACILITIES NEW FACILITY LOCATION ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF FUNDS Additional Secondary Capacity Unknown (1) Notes: (1)Anticipated source of funds is state matching funds, Impact Fees, future bond issues and/or non-voted debt issues 5 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2001/02 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Six Year Finance Plan Secured Funding Sources 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total Res¢nue Impact Fees(1) S531.000 $109,490 5640490 11 Land Sale Funds(2) S100000 S100000 S100000 S100000 S100000 565438 S565438 Bond Funds(3) S14453801 S10336,424 S24790225 TOTAL S14,553,801 S10,967,424 $209,490 S100,000 5100,000 $65,438 S25,996,153 Unsecured Fundure Sources State Match Funds(5) S10 000 000 Bond or Levy Funds(3) S47 385 000 fff Land Fund Sales(6) impact Fees(4) S150000 jOTAL S58.88S 000 NEW SCHOOLS 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total Cost New Secondary Ca achy(9) 526,250 S238.529 52 000,000 S3 000000 Sit 735 221 S17,000 OW New Senior Hugh School(12) S5 952 997 $21 180043 S 14 370 215 S544 354 S43 047,669 New Senior High School Site(10) 5 New Secondary Caoacity Site(11) S1600000 S1600000 MODERNIZATION AND EXPANSION ruman Sensor Hieh(Alternative) 56600 343 S3,867.122 5241 908 S5 709 373 Expansion Three Hish Schools S3,464500 52,904,500 S411000 S6.780 OQJJbk Expansion Elementary Schools $100,000 St 500,000 51,600, TEMPORARY FACILITEES Porrables(7) 5884,000 S136,010 S272020 $272,020 51,564,05 OTHER Safety Improvements(8a) S1.6000001 S1600000 School Improvements(8b) 51 300 000 $300,000 S600,000 S2 200 ON Facilities Department S250 000 S250,000 5250,000 S250,000 5250 000 5150,000 $1,500,000 TOTAL $14,167.840 S30AI1,915 S16,211,712 $4,430,364 $5,122,020 S12,257,241 $82,601,092 nDTFs I These fees are currently being held in a King County.City of Federal Way and City of Kent impact fee account.and will be available for use by the Disma for system improvements 2 These funds come from various sales of land and are am aside for cmmated expenditures 3 These funds will be used for future projects 4 These are projected fees based upon known residential des elopments in the District over the next six years 5 These funds are projected state matching funds 6 These funds are prolmied land sale income 7 These fees represent the cost of moving and siung existing portables and purchasing new portables The District may choose to purchase new portables to the years shown This esttmate may also include Elie cost of purchasing these portables 8o These projects have been approved by the Board of Directors and cover most schools These projects do not increase capacity These projects intrude parking and pedestrian safety improvements a 15 elementary schools Bb These projects have been approved by the Board of Directors and cover most schools These projects do not increase capacity These projects include school networks,information and library systems,new classmom star up,elementary playgmunds and high act al spons fields. music equipment,emergcncy commumcauon- 9 New secondary cpxeny is the middle school component of the bond Thu ss shown as cuddle school m the smpact fee c+lculmon The District is researching small school solutions that w,ll,encase capacity for students in the secondary grades 31 10 Site purchase for the high school of S3 2 M was compete in the MM lends year - s3J$ 11 Site pnidhase for the nuddle schooifnew uconduv camoty site or sues to be demmuned 12 Tonal c penditures through the 111/1000 for the Senor High School is S 752331 6 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2001/02 CAPITAL FACILITIES PL4N SECTION 2 - MAPS OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES Federal Way Public Schools (the District) has twenty-three elementary schools (grades K-6), seven junior high schools (grades 7-9), three senior high schools (grades 10-12) and two alternative schools (grades 7-12) for the 1999/00 school year The Internet Academy serves grades K-12 On April 20, 1996, the Federal Way Public Schools Board of Education adopted the boundaries for these schools In May 1999, minor adjustments to elementary boundaries were adopted The following maps show the service area boundaries for each school for each grade level (Harry S Truman High School, Merit School, Internet Academy and Federal Way Public Academy serve students from throughout the District) The identified boundaries are reviewed annually Any change in grade configuration or adoption of programs which affect school populations may necessitate a change in school service areas The Growth Management Act requires that a jurisdiction evaluate if the public facility infrastructure is in place to handle new housing developments In the case of most public facilities, new development has its major impact on the facilities immediately adjacent to that development School Districts are different. If the District does not have permanent facilities available, interim measures must be taken until new facilities can be built or until boundanes can be adjusted to match the population changes to the surrounding facilities. Adjusting boundaries requires careful consideration by the District and is not taken lightly It is recognized that there is a potential impact on students who are required to change schools Boundary adjustments impact the whole district, not just one school It is important to realize that a single housing development does not require the construction of a complete school facility School districts are required to project growth throughout the district and build or adjust boundaries based on growth throughout the district, not just around a single development 7 FEDERAL IVAT PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2001/02 CAPTIAL FACILITIES PLAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL BOUNDARIES F. RAL WAY SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 210 ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS •�u/• _ •�_ Code-• . Cade- l - - �I:•a r 10 Adelaide C-9 6a Plahee E 9 I 16 Bill Sri Kit.Kilo Gfi - _ 1, 2 • 28 Camelot G S 62 Lakots 0-6 I: Y� ,�;• 22 Enterprise D 9 61 Sacalawea E 5 _ 14 Green Gables A 7 70 Saghahe Cd J 00 Lake DolloR G-6 65 Totem G4 yeti 11 Lake Grove D-6 8 merit F-6 SS Lakeland F 9m , 2 Mark Twa F4 i 29 Meredith Hill H-5 SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS / _ Y I 'te 33 J 6 Mimor Lake E4 2 5 Nautilus E-5 Code.. 15 Dlympc Vlew C7 21 Panther Lake E-e 80 Decatur C-6 f A_• py - 27 Rainier Yww F10 81 Federal Way E5 's 41 Sherwoodm Forest 0-8 82 Thomas Jefferson G4 e I 24 Sdver Lake 0-7 0 Harry S Truman F-6 •••r a 3 26 Star Lake G-S 6 Ment F-6 25 Sunnycrest G-2 r 12 Twm Lakes BE _ •+ - 27 Valhalla G4 Future School Sites= L^'* •• •• 4 7 Wddwood F 5 Surpius Sites 1 - I r' - Woodmon! F S 100 Educatichat Samce Center F-6 - 1 o a.ucnu 99 Future Support Serwees EA _ code--� _ - i �• - ,s" _.a) 97 Maoltenaric"perabons Trenspodabun E4 0 p.,. Palls- �S FFO'RAL WAY WASHING7DN end VICIN/T _ •�•r • .-. - - - .} il - ��• Isa vo � y�_ y - i.J�a . l i - "-' ,e r -�. -�• ` � / sea - _`•• � •• Iz11 sass a. 1p �� •s it •' .�~ y �i r' - +� io TI • X `e• i + f N 8 ,i ri f�/•Y-�, -- __ oe.. . as •t�'� a. +e r ii IB $ - - a 'tir • ' .1,Yoe a , -r 'aa' .6 win��w I i r — a;l".tad' s ses i •• r r a- aT fywas mu u.w �l 4`- ' .a.. _ Ya ,a ` ,•y'�/ ••• i aY i a- e�� l Dry ' -�er r1 :.a• ;� 1 FEDERALI WAY It 10 (253) 945-2000 N...q.Fmunn rrA ,,.�®e ll I- • E Sao'. I ILI F G yH 8 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 200I/02 CAPTIAL FACILITIES PLAN Junior High School Boundaries RAL WAY SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 210 �} ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS COde•- Code- Nr =a 10 Adelaide CE 64 Illahee E-9 ` 16 8dgadoon B-8 66 Kilo GA 2 28 Camelot GS 62 Lakots OE 22 Enterprise 0 9 61 Sacalawea E S 14 Gre n Gables A 1 70 Saghahe C4 30 Lake Dolloff G-6 65 Totem G-3 I 11 Lake Grove DE 8 Merit F-6 33 Lakeland F-9 2 Mark Twain FA ''+•• •7 29 Meredith Hill H 5 SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS 3 a S 3 6 Mmor Lake Ei 5 Naublus E 5 Code - - 15 Olympic View C-7 / _ y 21 panther Lake E-8 80 Decatur C-6 37 Rainier View F-10 81 Federal Way E-5 at Sherwood Forest DA 83 Thomas Jefferson G-4 24 SHvar Lake D 7 8 Harry S Truman F-11 •'• :• 26 Star Lake G 3 8 Merit F-6 25 Sunnycrest G2 ~�• 13 Twin Lakes Ba 27 Valhalla GJ Futum School Sites— 7 Wildwooa F 5 Surplus Sites — I Woodmont Fa 100 Educational Sernce Center FE 99 Future Support Services EA _ Cade--■ ' �'� _ — i 97 Malntenance-Operabons Transportation E6 D w •.�• + ) �_° parka- -.s _ "•� S B pp(7JyEEqq = 1' 3 FAL WAY WASHINGTON and VICINIT — �� ye�.r •��,� ,_Q •, -I , rrS •fr! ",w tBa.,.,•' ' ?��� � :-y..�� ' t �e` a +'- �• _ w ..I�!' ' I _ P 19W* - )I • , S7 ! • ! �- �' ,a •% ' Mgr sa w•••a�s•H sea. x - _ rwraa�m. a n• _ r' ; 1'v• •,a, ...,...,,__,•. i I�t � __ `. = �/,fA... : are' FEDERALi ,� W� �, <_ ....- 2O ,� � 1 ; Y to eW�n.•„F"akla (253) 945-2000 - a•e f „ +"" 7! E li—F G X 9 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2001/02 CAPTIAL FACILITIES PLAN Senior High School Boundaries F, AL WAY SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 210 � 1 ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS a��a f --- _ Code-- Cade-- :1 10 Adelaide C41 64 Maned E-9 16 Bngadoon BA 66 Kilo GA 28 Camelot G 5 62 Lakata D.6 p y _ _ r•• 22 Enterpnse 0-9 61 Sacajawea E-5 14 Green Gables A-7 70 Saghalte C-8 ` — 30 Lake DolloH GA 65 Totem G 3 y»I^ 11 Lake Grave DA 8 Ment Fb 1 33 Lakeland F-9 {;, ^ - 2 Mark Twain F< 29 MvW,th Hill If SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS fi Minn.,imor Lake E-0 J j i j j 5 Nautilus E 5 Code•- 1 15 Olympic View C.7 �• - i lr , 21 Panther Lake E-8 80 Decatur C-6 — ^I- 37 Rainier View Flo 81 Federal Way E-5 41 Sherwood Foreat D-6 53 Thomas Jefferson Gd 24 Silver Lake 0-7 8 HarrjS Truman F.6 26 Sw,Like G-3 8 Ment F-9 - 25 Sunnyaest G 2 - 13 Twm Likes B-5 27 Valhalla Gi Future School Saes— = - 4 7 Wddwootl F 5 Surplus Srtea — 1 Waodmon0 F-3 100 Educational Service Center F-6 99 FuWle Su rw Support Seees Ed — Cade--� •e ow �t 97 Maintenance-Opiraeons-TranaportaLon E-6 •r— d Parks- S FEDERAL WAY. WASHINGTON and VICINIT Lac •aa f•r' [! ^`r r _1�� 'I. ' •'�" j + e z •7 .s Yi2 n 'l a f I! � •, ��• �. r .Lt; I d - r•.r.1- L I 7 WE mWe'ral -r ? 6 > t- -� rl , fi -J� ( • a [ to �� • J7J� a a21v'T �_ vesr r' .r • J ° gf .s �s _ 5i•a i i _ � + - I y .nn.w Lev y• [: t ! l y9 .� a. •!sae i i a FEDERALI WAY 10 10 v (253) 945-2000 Fan .,aF vne Vasa. rF G �'• H 10 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2001/02 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 3 - SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION Building Capacities -The Education Program Portable Locations Student Forecast - 2001 through 2006 Capacity Summaries King County Impact Fees - Single and Multi Faintly Units 11 FEDER4L WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2001/02 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Building Capacities This Capital Facilities Plan establishes the District's "standard of service" in order to ascertain the District's current and future capacity. The Supenntendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, but these guidelines do not take into consideration the education program needs The Distnct has identified a Building Program Capacity for each of the schools in the District This Full Time Equivalent (FTE) capacity is based on • The number of classrooms available in each school • Any special requirements at each school • The contracted class load by grade level In general, the District's current standard provides that the average class size for a standard classroom for grade K is 24 students , for grades 1-6 is 26 students and grades 7-12 is 25 students Gate (Gifted and Talented Education) classrooms are 25 students, individual education programs classrooms are 15 students, and special education classrooms are 12 students This size is determined based upon current ratios and trends as well as the physical size of the classroom Educational Program Capacities change every year This analysis is for the 2000/01 school year The capacity of an individual school could and does change at any time depending on program changes which may require additional space Capacity is affected by changes in class size The Federal Way School District has expressed a goal of reducing class size. Discussion on the exact target classes size is ongoing. The Board of Education has adopted a recommendation to reduce class size for grades K through grade 2 to a 20.1 ratio This grade level reduction will be addressed in the Capital Facilities Plan for 2002/03 12 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2001/02 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITIES ELEMENTARY BUILDING JUNIOR HIGH BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY PROGRAM CAPACITY Adelaide 488 Illahee 821 i Brieadoon 528 Kilo 854 Camelot 374 Lakota 741 Enterprise 512 Saca awes 828 Green Gables 494 Saghalie 768 Lake Dolloff 482 Totem 709 Lake Grove 476 Lakeland 488 1998 TOTAL 4,721 Mark Twain 503 Meredith Hill 498 Junior High Average 787 Mirror Lake 398 Nautilus 542 SENIOR HIGH BUILDING Olympic View 450 PROGRAM CAPACITY Panther Lake 514 Rainier View 468 Decatur 1230 Sherw cod Forest 550 Federal Way 1,476 Silver Lake 528 Thomas Jefferson 1,409 Star Lake 502 Sunn)crest 462 1998 TOTAL 4,115 Twin Lakes 502 Valhalla 494 ISenior High Average 1 372 W ildu ood 428 Woodmont 450 ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY 1998 TOTAL 11,131 Ment School1 Elementarn Average 484 Truman High School 194 1998 TOTAL 210 Notes Elementary program capacities are based on the number of teaching stations in the building,contracted class size,and special use classrooms in place du= the 99/00 school year All available instructional space is calculated Secondary program capacities are based on peak loading The calculation is based on 25 students per available teaching stations. Capacities were calculated by the Study and Survey Committee and amended for changes in instructional programs 13 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2001/02 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN a Portable Locations The Washington State Constitution requires the State to provide each student a basic education It is not efficient use of District resources to build a school %%ith a capacity for 500 students due to lack of space for 25 students when enrollment fluctuates throughout the year and from year to year. Portables are used as temporary facilities or interim measures to house students until permanent facilities can be built or boundary adjustments can be made When permanent facilities become available, the portable(s) is either moved to another school for an interim classroom, or used for other purposes such as storage or child care programs. Some portables may not be fit to move due to age or physical condition In these cases the District may choose to buy new portables and surplus these unfit portables It is the practice and philosophy of Federal Way Public Schools that portables are not acceptable as permanent facilities The following page provides a list of the location of the portable facilities used for temporary educational facilities by Federal Way Public Schools 14 i FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2001/02 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PORTABLE LOCATIONS PORTABLES LOCATED PORTABLES LOCATED AT ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS AT SENIOR HIGHS don no. nsmurnonn� natxuc'ro.nt csf 6=0,4nt ns L=ONni Adelaide 3 Decatur 4 Briaadoon 1 Federal Way 1 Camelot 1 Thomas Jefferson Enterprise 3 Truman 4 1 Green Gables 1 Ment 4 Lake Dolloff 2 TOTAL 13 1 Lake Grove 2 Lakeland 2 Mark Twain 3 Meredith Hill 3 PORTABLES LOCATED Minor Lake 4 AT SUPPORT FACILITIES Nautilus 1 Olympic View 2 MOT 1 Panther Lake 3 Clothing Bank 1 Rainier View 3 Sherwood Forest 4 TOTAL 2 Silver Lake 4 Star Lake 4 Sunn crest 1 1 HEAD START PORTABLES AT DISTRICT SITES Twin Lakes 2 1 Valhalla 2 Wildwood 4 or Lake 1 Woodmont 3 Sherwood Forest 1 TOTAL 58 2 Total 2 PORTABLES LOCATED AT JUNIOR HIGHS nod nsrn�rnorn� ns*xurno^w. Federal Way Public Academy 8 1 Blahee 3 Kilo 3 1 Lakota 3 Saca awes 1 Saohahe 4 Totem 5 TOTAL 27 2 15 FEDER-,L WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2001102 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Student Forecast Student enrollment projections are a basic component of budget development. Enrollment projections influence many of the financial estimates that go into budget preparation. The majority of staffing requirements are derived directly from the forecasted number of students Allocations for instructional supplies and materials are also made on the basis of projected enrollment Other expenditures and certain revenue projections are directly related to enrollment projections Enrollment projections are completed annually in the Business Services Department. Projections must be detailed at various levels, district total, school-building totals, grade level and program level to include vocational and special education students The basis of projections has been cohort survival analysis. Cohort survival is the analysis of a group that has a common statistical value (grade level) as it progresses through time Ina stable population the cohort would be 100 for all grades. This analysis uses historical information to develop averages and project the averages forward This method does not trace individual students: it is concerned with aggregate numbers in each grade level The district has used this method with varying years of history and weighted factors to study several projections Because transfers in and out of the school system are common, student migration is factored into the analysis as it increases or decreases 'survival rates Entry grades (kindergarten) are a unique problem in cohort analysis The district collects information on birth rates within the district's census tracts, and treats these statistics as a cohort for kindergarten enrollment in the appropriate years The Federal Way School District is using various statistical methods for projecting student enrollments. The resultant forecasted-enrollments are evaluated below. The first method is a statistical cohort analysis that produces ten distinct forecasts These are. forecast of enrollment for one year The projections vary depending on the number of years of historical information and how they are weighted A second method is a projection using an enrollment projection software package that allows the user to project independently at school or Bade level and to aggregate these projections for the district level The Enrollment MasterT software provides statistical methods including trend line, standard grade progression (cohort) and combinations of these methods. This software produces a five-year,projection of school enrollment Short-term budget projections may be more conservative than the standard grade progression model. For the 2001/02 school year, the district chose the Enrollment MasterTM projection using standard grade progression model. Standard grade progression is a reasonably accurate method for the near term future when the near future looks much like the near past 16 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2001102 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Long range projections that establish the need for facilities are a modification of the cohort survival method The cohort method of analysis becomes less reliable the farther out the projections are made The Federal Way School District long-range projections are studied annually The study includes information from the jurisdictional demographers as they project future housing and population in the region The long-range projections used by Federal Way Public Schools reflect a sirrular age trend in student populations as the projections published by the Office of Financial Management for the State of Washington Growth Management requires jurisdictions to plan for a rrunimum of twenty years The Federal Way School District is a partner in this planning with the various jurisdictions comprising the school district geography. These projections create a vision of the school district in the future 17 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2001/02 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Full Time Equivalent Enrollment History and Projections Simplified FrE(K Headcount= 5 FIE,Junior High FrE=989 Headcount,Seruor High FfE= 932 Headcount) Total K.12 Percent School Year Elementan_ Junior Mgh Senior High FTE Change 1994-95 10,505 4,626 3,758 18,889 1995-96 10,689 4,838 3,796 19,323 2 No 1996-97 10,863 4,930 3,913 19,706 1 9% 1997.98 11,123 5,073 4,082 20,278 28% 1998-99 1I,480 5,080 4,I20 20,680 I990 1999-00 11,672 5,110 4,348 21,079 19% 2000-01 11,640 5,300 4390 21,330 12% P2001-02 11,593 5,404 4,425 21,422 049� P2002-03 11,579 5,593 4,423 21,595 0.8% * P2003-04 9,660 5,558 6,491 21,709 0.555 P2004.03 9,643 5,541 6,735 21,919 1.0% P2005-06 9,637 5,575 6,839 22,031 &69G P2006-07 9,585 5,582 6,956 22,123 0,39c New Configuratiorl Elementary K-5 Middle School 6.8 High School9.12 Enrollment History and Six Year Forecast - 23,000 3 0% 22,000 2 5% 21,000 2 0% '0 20,000 a o m _ � m = 19,000 15% d � a 18,000 O 10% 17,000 0 5% 16,000 15,000 0 0% `° �9zo �°m •49c �4m aO$ N$ Q'oo Aoo �o °$ a$ W v S S School Year OFrE --*--Percent of Change�]�� 18 FEDERAL NAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2001/02 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Capacity Summanes Al] Grades, Elementary,Junior High, and Senior High Schools The Capacity Summaries combine Building Capacity information and the Student Forecast information. The result demonstrates the requirements for new or remodeled facilities and why there is a need for the District to use temporary facilities or interim measures. The information is organized in spreadsheet format, with a page summarizing the enure District, and then evaluating capacity vs number of students at elementary, Junior high, and senior high levels individually. The notes at the bottom of each spreadsheet provide information about what facilities are in place each year I i 19 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2001/02 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY SUtL%IARY-ALL GRADES Actual Projected- - CAPACITY 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 BUILDING PROGRAM 7- CAPACITY 19,994 19,994 19,968 < 20,242 21,686 21,660 21,634 Add or subtract changes to capacity ft Special Education Changes (26) (26) c (26) (26) (26) Truman High modernization and expansion 106 Increase Capacit♦ at Three High Schools 300 a New Middle School 800 New High School e 1,364 Adjusted Program Capacity 19,994 i 19,968 i 207242 1 21,686 i 21,660 1 21,634 22,434 ENROLLMENT Basic FPE Enrollment 21,330 21,422 21,595 21,709 121,919 1 22,051 121,21223 Internet Academy Enrollment 322 322 322 322 322 322 Basic FPE Enrollment without Intemet-Academ} 21,008 21,100 21,273 21,387 21,597 21,729 21,801 SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) I PROGRAM CAPACITY (1,014) (1,132) (1,031) 299 63 (97 633 RELOCATABLE CAPACITY Current Portable Capacity 2,400 2,400 2,400 2,725 2,725 2,775 2,875 Add/Subtract Portable Capacity Add New Portable Capacity 325 50 100 100 Adjusted Portable Capacity 2,400 2,400 2,725 2,725 2,775 2,875 2,975 SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 1,386 1,268 1,694 3,024 2,838 2,780 3,608 20 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2001/02 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY SUl11AARY-ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS Actual Projected-- CAPACITY 2000 2001 2002 z 2003 2004 2005 2006 r. BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY 11,131 11,131 11,105 - 11,079 11,053 11,027 11,001 i f7 1 Special Education Changes (26) (26) _ (26) (26) j26) ao` Adjusted Prof-ram Capacity 11,131 11,105 11,079 - 11,053 11,027 1 11,001 11,001 I ENROLLMENT Basic FTE Enrollment 11,640 11,593 11,579 9,660 9,643 9,637 9,5S5 2 Internet Academv 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 Basic FI'E Enrollment without Internet Academv 11,571 11,524 11,510 9,591 9,574 91568 9,516 1 SURPLUS OR(IN HOUSED) PROGRAM CAPACITY (440) (419) (431) 1,462 1,453 1,433 1,485 dELOCATABLE CAPACITY 3 Current Portable Capacity 1,450 1,450 1,450 1,450 1,450 1,450 1,450 Add/Subtract portable capacity Adjusted Portable Capacity 1,450 1,450 1,450 1,450 1,450 1,450 1,450 SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 1,010 1,031 1,019 2,912 2,903 2,883 2 935 NOTES. 1 Add Program; 3 ECEAP, 1 SBD (Severely Behavioral Disordered) and 1 Pre-School Program This reduces Basic Education capacity in the school years indicated 2 Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities 3 Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other adminrstrauve techniques which can be used to ter,poranly house students until permanent facilities are available This is a calculated number only The actual number of portables that will be used will be based upon actual population needs 21 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2001/02 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN i CAPACITY SUMMARY•JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS Actual Projected- - CAPACITY 2000 2001 2002 z 2003 2004 2005 2006 BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY 4,721 4,721 4,721 4,721 4,721 4,721 4,721 1 Add New Secondary Capacity ° 800 r Adjusted Program Capacity 4,721 4,721 4,721 4,721 4,721 4,721 5,521 ENROLLMENT Basic FTE Enrollment F5�-300 5,404 5,593 5,558 5,541 5,575 5,512 2 Internet Academy 40 140 140 140 140 140 140 Basic FTE Enrollment without Internet Academv ,160 5,264 5 453 5,418 5,401 5,435 5,442 1, SURPLUS OR(LNI HOUSED) PROGRAM CAPACITY (439) (543) (732) (697) (680) (714) 79 RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 3 Current Portable Capacity 675 675 675 800 800 800 800 Add/Subtract portable capacity Add new portable capacity 125 Adjusted Portable Capacity 675 675 800 800 800 800 800 SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) - PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 236 132 68 103 120 86 879 NOTES: I Add new middle school 2 Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities 3 Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available This is a calculated number only The actuil number of portables that will be used will be based upon actual popula')Dn needs 22 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2001/02 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY SUDMARY.SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS Actual Projected- - CAPACITY 2000 2001 2002 Z 2003 2004 2005 2006 BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY 4,325 4,325 4,325 4,625 6,095 6,095 6,095 rAdd or subtract changes in caoacin n 1 Truman Remodel = 106 2 Add Capacity to Three High Schools 300 3 Add New High School 1,364 Adjusted Program Capacity 4,325 1 4,325 1 4,625 r 6,095 6,095 6,095 6,095 ENROLLMENT Basic FTE Enrollment 4,390 4,425 4,423 6,491 6,735 6,839 6,956 4 Internet Academy 113 113 113 113 113 113 113 Basic Ed without Internet Academy 4,277 4,312 4,310 6,378 6,622 6,726 6,843 SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) PROGRAM CAPACITY 48 13 315 (283) (527) (631) (748) RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 5 Current Portable Capacity 325 325 325 525 525 575 675 Add\Subtract portable capacity ` Add new portable capacity 200 50 100 100 t Adjusted Portable Capacity 325 325 525 525 575 675 775 SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 373 338 840 242 48 44 27 NOTES: 1 Truman High School modernization and expansion 2 Add capacity to three existing high schools 3 Add new high school 4 Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities 5 Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other adrturmtrauve techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available This is a calculated number only The actual number of portables that will be used will be based upon actual population needs 'r 23 FEDERAL NAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2001/02 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN King County the Citv of Federal Wav, and the City of Kent Impact Fee Calculations Single and Multi-Family Residences i Each jurisdiction that imposes school impact fees requires that developers pay these fees to help cover a share of the impact of new housing developments on school facilities. To determine an equitable fee throughout unincorporated King County, a formula was established This formula can be found in King County Code 21A and was substantially adopted by the Cite of Federal Way and Kent The formula requires the District to establish a "Student Generation Factor" which estimates how many students will be added to a school district by each new single or multi-family unit and to gather some standard construction costs, which are unique to that district. - STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR ANALYSIS Federal Way Public Schools student generation factor was determined separately for single family units and multi-family units. The factors used in the 2001/02 Capital Facilities Plan ' were derived using actual generation factors from single family units and multi-family units, which were constructed in the last five (5) years IMPACT FEE CALCULATION Following the calculations for the student generation factor is a copy of the Impact Fee Calculation for single family and multi-family units based on King County Code 21A and the Growth Management Act ➢ Temporary Facility Cost is the average cost of a portable purchased within the last 12 months. ➢ Site Acquisition Costs is the per acre cost of the last school site purchased (site 85); this is a negotiated purchase price Plan Year2001/02 Plan Year1999/00 Collection Year 2001/02 Collection Year2000101 Single Family Units $2,616 $2,710. Multi-Family Units $ 896. $ 830 24 m Comm monnm c� �no co mco coQmom m nNo c �nnmmomomn m c cvmo O j m < < m m m m O m n [Np d O j g m Q 0 F m N 0) n n O m m O M H N m 0 N U' c7 n N c"7 Q m m m U' < CI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O t N m < O Q of O n V] m t - m r m N 0 c7 O m �O N Ol r O N N O U < O O m O m N < Q O V 0) < m � O O R 0 u'1 c7 n m N m O m ^ � O O m N co N O 0 fA LL - - 0 0 < N N N ^ O 0 N LL 0 0 0 O (p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (n O O O 1 00 Q c7 < if! O O O n m Q p n m C7 ,C 0 O_ O O O O O m N M L m ^ N U N O m r n m N 9 V < QI 0 0 0 O O m N 0] to m 4 V < N N O y R m n n V1 O O O m 0) Q O R N N m O ' p] U' O O O O N M N r O N LL 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0101010, O O O T M N N m m O O m < n N m N N MOO M c0 O m O O m Q m h C m N < O d O m i N N M O O M o w N L d m N Q n N N F1 O O C1 O m fV O 9 U m < n m O O O N N < Cl itl O OI t0 01 c'l O R m 0 cO O E C1 m N f7 c� N N c'J m E m n m � d N LL N Q N N c7 c7 N N < N O O N LL O O N O W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W coo L t L L p Ol N p ow 2 C = C r d � ^ m m m N n N d d 0N co m£ C = N m E E Cl It „'ni - Z co N Z y N < O - C E' Z ,,. U O t N •C O L N O d C aN9 � Q - OooCP) w , mom - aN nin ^ , -0� �N u Z N = F- C 3 cal - • E E � mQmNncrni `onvN � E E E � mu� op U 7 d y L p O y Z W - z � T T D E N D N c c L lL O O O O O O O g 0 0 0 a LL m N E N < E • c z' � � Z � 3: a I I a g E N o E N � 1i � mmn ^ ^iN 'nOOQ1 � .daLL co oo 0 ? O y N N N Ni^ N Pl ^Im O d0—y Z c ❑ I Z c G N I N � C N ~ ~ E LU x v `m LU c -O c m Oo m ° to o 3m m —W Coca > = P o = R 0 0A� 27d U) C4 ComH mD 0 o m rn m m n n m �c m N � 20rnrn2mm o� mm FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2001/02 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN LVIPACT FEE School Site Acquisition Cost: Student Student Facility Cost I Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Cosy Acreaee Acre Ca act SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary 0 00 50 484 0 3227 0 0840 s0 s0 •... ' Middle School 2000 580.000 800 0 1525 0 0266 5305 553 Sr Hi_?h 40 00 580 000 1364 0 1454 0 0676 S341 $159 TOTAL S646 S212 School Construction Cost: Student Student %Perm Fac/ Facility Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Total So Ft Cost Capacity SFR MFR SFR MFR 1 Elementary 96 569c 50 484 0 3227 00840 s0 50 Middle School 965690 517,000,000 800 01525 00266 53.129 5546 Sr High 96 5690 543.800,000 1,364 0 1454 00676 54.308 S2.096 TOTAL $7,638 S2.642 JTemporary Facility Cost- Student Student 9c Temp Fac Facility Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Total Sq Ft Cost Size SFR MFR SFR MFR Element 3449c SO 25 03227 01140 SO SO ----------- Middle School 3 4490 565.005 = 015b 0 0266 S14 52 Sr High 3 419a 568.005 25 0 1454 0 0676 - 514 56 TOTAL S28 S9 State Matching Credit Calculation. Student Student Boeck Cost/ Sq Ft State Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Sq F[ Student Match SFR MFR SFR MIFR Elementary S 103 55 0 0 009c 0 3227 0 0840 SO 50 Middle School S I03 i5 110 0 0090 0 I525 0 6266 SO s0 New Sr High 5103 So 120 61 7490 0 1454 0 0676 S1.115 $519 Total S1,1I5 $519 Tax Paymeiit Credit Calculation SFR MFR Average Assessed Value (April 2001) 5176267 S49.627 Capital Bond Interest Race(May 2001) 5 2590 5 25% Net Present Value of Average Dwelling 51,344,713 5378596 Years Amortized 10 10 Property Tax Levy Rate 51 46 S1 46 Present Value of Revenue Stream S1963 $553 Single Family Multi-Family Residences Residences Mitigation Fee Summary Site Acquisition Cost S 646 S 212 Permanent Facility Cost S 7,638 S 2 642 Temporary Facility Cost $ 28 S 9 State Match Credit S (I 115) 5 (519) Tax Payment Credit S (1963) S (553) Sub-Total S 5,233 $ 1,791 50%Local Share S 2,616 S 896 Impact Fee S 2,616 $ 896 26 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2001/02 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 4 SUMMARY OF CHANGES FROM THE 2000/01 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN The 2001/02 Capital Facilities Plan is an updated document, based on the 1999/00 Capital Facilities Plan The changes between the 1999/00 Plan and the 2001/02 Plan are listed below OVERALL PLAN NAME CHANGE This Capital Facilities Plan is designated as the 2001/02 Capital Facilities Plan to align with the naming conventions of other Mng County School Districts Federal Way practice had been to name the plan for the school year in which it was adopted. The name is now changed to reflect the year in which the fees will go into effect SECTION I-THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN INVENTORY OF EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES Leased facilities now include ECEAP offices The Security Department has been re-located to the Administration Building INVENTORY OF UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY Site 85 is added to inventory—purchased site for the new senior high school. Site 9 is removed from the inventory, this site has been sold. i SIX YEAR FINANCE PLAN The Six Year Finance Plan has been rolled forward to reflect 2001/2006 27 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2001102 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION III - SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION CAPACITY The average capacity of senior high schools is increased from 1311 to 1372 This change is a result of analysis of current building use and programs in place for the 2000/01 school year. Building Program Capacities are found on page 13 PORTABLES The list of portables reflects the movement of portables between facilities or new portables purchased Portable Locations can be found on page 15. STUDENT FORECAST The Student Forecast now covers 2001 through 2006. The new forecast reflects a decreased rate of growth Enrollment History and Projections are found on page 18 CAPACITY SUMbLARY ' The changes in the Capacity Summary are a reflection of the changes in the capacities and student forecast New schools and increased capacity at current buildings are shown as increases to capacity Capacity Summaries are found on pages 20-23 IMPACT FEE CALCULATION - KING COUNTY CODE 21A The Impact Fee Calculations have changed due to changes in several factors. The adjustment made in the Impact Fee Calculation, causing a change in the Impact Fee between the 1999/00 Capital Facilities Plan and the 2001/02 Capital Facilities Plan can be found on page 29 l i ;i 7 28 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2001102 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN IMPACT FEE CALCULATION CHANGES FROM 1999/00 TO 2001/02 STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS Student Generation factors are based on rates for new developments constructed over a period of not more than five years prior to the date of the fee calculation. The changes in student Generation factors between the 1999/00 Capital Facilities Plan and the 2001/02 Capital Facilities Plan are due to developments that were deleted or added based upon the age of the developments Student allocation is also changed to reflect the rmddle school configuration The Student General worksheet is found on pave 25 DNIPACT FEE Item From/To Comment Percent of Permanent Facilities 96 70 to Report#3 OSPI 96.56% Percent Temporary Facilities 3 30% to Updated portable inventory 3.44% Temporary Facility Cost $60,374. to Updated cost of most recently $68,005. purchased portables Boeck Cost/Sq Ft $101.39 to Change per OSPI $103.55 State Match 60 62% to Change per OSPI 61.74% Average Assessed Value SFR - Per Puget Sound Educational Service $163,436 to District (ESD 121) $176,267 MFR - $45,536 To $49,627 Capital Bond Interest Rate 5 94% to Market Rate 5.25% Property Tax Levy Rate $1 42 to King County Treasury Division $1.46 29 Mission Federal Way Public Schools is obligated to educate all students in acadeinic knowledge, -skills, abilities and responsible behavior to be successful, contributing members of a free society. Vision: Every Student a Reader * All 3`d graders reading at grade level by 2004 * All le graders reading at grade level by 2006 * *90% of ALL students reading at grade level by 2009 Federal Way Public Schools 3140518'h Avenue S Federal Way, Washington 98003-5433 (253)945-2000 This document is published by the Business Services Department of the Federal Way Public Schools June 2001 _I �r FEDERAL, WAY .; ` FEDERALI WAY . . August 21, 2001 RECEIVED AUS " 2001 Charlene Anderson PLANNING CITY SKENCES City of Kent Planning 220 South Fourth Avenue Kent WA 98032 Dear Charlene, Enclosed are 14 copies of the Federal Way School District 2001/02 Capital Facilities Plan This plan is scheduled to go to the Federal Way School District Board for adoption at the August 27, 2001 regular Board Meeting. I hay a also enclosed a copy of the DNS that was published in May A copy of the DNS was_sent at that time to the City of Kent to the attention of Jim Hams The schedule of expenditures for 2000 is also included in this package Please let me know if you have any questions about the changes in the CFP for Federal Way Schools My direct line is (253) 945-2071 or email at 2wa1ker@f«sd wednet edu Sincerely, Gen Walker i Business Services GIS Specialist 3,izc- V,•r-jJ KENT& FED. WAY SCHL DISTRICTS S_P U #CPA-2001-2(G)/KIVA#2012913 CITYQc ( ) PL,Rr;117 CE,; Charlene Anderson, Planner Phone (253) 945-2000 • 31405 18th Avenue South • Federal Way, WA 98003.5433 • www.fwsd.wednet.edu RECEIVED FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS AUG 2 \rJ 2001 IMPACT FEES - CITY OF KENT TY SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES - 2000 KANNING SE vlceS Invoice Date Warrant# Project Vendor Expenditure Amoun ount Date Type Se -00 40972 Portables - Sunn crest KCDA Carpet Se -00 40494 Portables - Sunn crest KCDA 1 Single Portable Totals $ 42,723.79 1~',C-i GrD 0 C ZZ' CITY nr '<ENT 75s627/2 State of Washington, Counties of Kin;and Snohorrush, Jesus F Martinez being duly sworn, says that he/she is the Authorized Agent of Seattle Times Company, publisher of The Seattle Times and representing the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, separate newspapers published daily in King and Snohomish Counties, State of Washington that they are newspapers of general circulation in said Counties and State, that they have been approved as legal newspapers by orders of the Superior Court of King and Snohomish Counties, that the annexed, being a classified advertisement, was published in e sa i u ca The Seattle Times 05/18/01 And not in a supplement thereof, and is a true copy of the notice as it was printed and/or distributed in the regular and entire issue of said paper or papers during all of said period, and that said newspaper or newspapers were regularly distributed to its subscribers during all of said period 61 Subscribed and swom to before me this 22nd day of May,2001 mL I ' PAr & Notar- Public i nd for the Stcte of Washington tesiding at Seattle Fpttvl�W Oy'E STC. aY PVpli<$clroalf � {in 1 DerermmaffonN i�" `waONs'Iq c2 I! No. to P, IIrYn ; Federal Wav PmIc Schools hot �•(ip V. 9ssued a aelCONS]tlan at ham 197-11 rice (tat antler WAC MN 19/-11•S C001 M the D pl.h i 1oa1,C1 Cavltal Facllllea Plvn � r DQ � v ANer of a eomvleted envl• A rnmenMinral chall, vnd cedar ar N'e hay PMlan an}Ile. tb Fedea. - u `O*`_ 10 - WaY P9WIc SCLaols py dlten 0 T Kdthear0ap IfIcant Ia rrlit 1n O4, anWrmimanfal9�fimxuv an Me aave // rsl,t,,,aaaa``�� - anYvanlnera q CM41ia f Me QWe nvuear a Ittli,` OF WPS FeaeM S Papllc Schools. SIrpS lelh Aw S.,Federal War. W 99M•CCmnMhfs nn Imf DNS b m. be IpI b hed n0 bier mah S Me Gaon addrpf Jx:CaNsanaf Data of Publlevtlon- le,]001 DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE RECEIVED Issued with a 14 Day comment and appeals period AUG 2 5 "2001 0 F EN Description of Proposal PLANNING SErr CES This threshold determination analyzes the environmental impacts associated with the following actions, which are so closely related to each other that they are in effect a single action 1 The adoption of the Federal Way Public Schools' 2001/02 Six Year Capital Facilities Plan by the Federal Way Public Schools for the purposes of planning for the facilities needs of the District 2 The amendment of the King County Comprehensive Plan by King County to include the Federal Way Public Schools' 2001/02 Capital Facilities Plan as part of the Capital Facilities Plan Element of the Kin; County Comprehensive Plan 3 The amendment of the Comprehensive Plans of the City of Federal Way and the City of Kent to include the Federal Way Public Schools' 2001/02 Capital Facilities Plan as part of the Capital Facilities Plan Element of the City of Federal Way and the City of Kent's Comprehensive Plan This proposal may also involve the amendment of the Comprehensive Plans of the Cities of Auburn, and Des Moines to incorporate the Federal Way Public Schools' 200I/02 Capital Facilities Plan into the Capital Facilities Element of each jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan. Proponent- Federal Way Public Schools Location of the Proposal The Federal Way Public Schools District includes an area of approximately 35 square miles The cities of Federal Way, Kent, Des Moines andAuburn fall within the District's boundaries, as do parts of unincorporated King County Lead Agency Federal Way Public Schools is the lead agency pursuant to WAC 197-11-926 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse environmental impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43 21C 030(2)(c) This decision was made after a review of the completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency This information is available to the public upon request This Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date of issue Comments must be submitted by 5 00 p m , June 1, 2001 The responsible official will reconsider the DNS based on timely comments and may retain, modify, or, if significant adverse impacts are likely, withdraw the DNS If the DNS is retained, it will be final after the expiration of the comment deadline Responsible Official Ms Jeri Carlson Manager of Budget and Planning Federal Way Public Schools Telephone (253) 945-2045 Address 31405 18th Avenue South _ • Federal Way WA 98003 You may appeal this determination in writing by 5 00 p.m., June 1, 2001, to Jeri Carlson, Federal Way Public Schools, 31405 18th Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003. Date of Issue May 16, 2001 Date Published May 18, 2001 2 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAC 197-11-960 Environmental Checklist Purpose of Checklist The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required Instructions for Applicants This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge In most yes, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply " Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations Answer these questions if you can If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact 1 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Use of checklist for nonproject proposals Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply" In addition, complete the Supplemental Sheet for nonproject actions (part D) For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively • 2 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST BACKGROUND 1 Name of proposed project, if applicable- The adoption of a Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan by the Federal Way School Distnct No 210 for the purposes of planning for the District's facilities needs The King County, City of Federal Way, and the City of Kent's Comprehensive Plan will be amended to include the District's 2001/02 Capital Facilities Plan in the Capital Facilities Plan Element This project may also involve the amendment of the Comprehensive Plans of the cities of Des Moines and Auburn to incorporate the District's 2001/02 Capital Facilities Plan A copy of the District's Plan is available for review in the District's offices 2 Name of applicant Federal Way School District No 210 3 Address and phone number of applicant and contact person. Federal Way School District No. 210 31405 18th Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 (253) 945-2000 Contact Person. Ms Jeri Carlson Manger of Budget and Financial Planning Telephone (253) 945-2045 4 Date checklist prepared May 16, 2001 5 Agency requesting checklist Federal Way School District No 210 6 Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): The Federal Way School District's 2001102 Capital Facilities Plan is scheduled to be adopted by the District in July 2001. The Capital Facilities Plan will be forwarded to King County, the City of Federal Way and the City of Kent for inclusion in each jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan. It will also be forwarded to the cities of Des Moines and Auburn for possible inclusion in these jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plans. The District will continue to update the Capital Facilities Plan annually. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject to project-specific environmental review 3 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 7 Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposalsi If}es, explain The Capital Facilities Plan sets forth the capital improvement projects that the District plans to implement over the next six years These include modernization and expansion of an alternative high, purchase and siting of temporan, facilities and construction of a senior high school and increasing secondary capacity. 8 List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will undergo additional environmental review, when appropriate, as they are deN eloped 9 Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the properi} covered by your proposal9 If yes, explain No applications are currently pending. 10 List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known The District anticipates that King County, the City of Federal Way and the City of Kent will adopt this Capital Facilities Plan into their Comprehensive Plan The cities of Des Moines and Auburn may also adopt this Capital Facilities Plan into the Capital Facilities Elements of their Comprehensive Plans (when issued) 11. Give a brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description ) This is a non-project action This proposal involves the adoption of the Federal Way School District's 2001/02 Capital Facilities Plan for the purpose of planning the District's facilities needs. The District's Capital Facilities Plan will be incorporated into King County's, the City Federal Way, and the City of Kent's Comprehensive Plans. It may also be incorporated into the Comprehensive Plans of the cities of Des Moines and Auburn The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject to project-specific environmental review A copy of the Capital Facilities Plan m4y be viewed at the District's offices 4 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 12. Location of the proposal Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address if any, and section, township, and range, if known If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s) Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should subrrut any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans subrrutted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The Capital Facilities Plan will affect the Federal Way School District The District includes an area of approximately 35 square miles The City of Federal Way, parts of the cities of Kent, Des Moines and Auburn, parts of unincorporated King County, fall within the District's boundaries. A detailed map of the District's boundaries can be viewed at the District's offices 5 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST B ENVIRONIENTAL ELEMENTS * ' I Earth a General description of the site (circle one) Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other The Federal Way School District is comprised of a variety of topographic land forms and gradients Specific topographic characteristics of the sites at which the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan are located have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate b What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Specific slope characteristics at the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review c What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)9 If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland Specific soil types found at the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Unstable soils may exist within the Federal Way School District Specific soil lirrutations on individual project sites have been or will be identified at the time of project-level environmental review when appropriate e Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed Indicate source of fill Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject, when appropriate, to project-specific environmental review and local approval at the time of proposal Proposed grading projects, as well as the purpose, type, quantity, and source of any fill materials to be used have been or will be identified at that time. f Could erosion occur as a result of cleanng, construction, or use? If so, generally describe It is possible that erosion could occur as a result of the construction projects currently proposed in the Capital Facilities Plan The erosion impacts of the individual projects have bee, or will be evaluated on a site-specific basis at the time of project-specific environmental review when appropriate. Individual projects have been or will be subject to local approval processes. 6 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST g About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings?) The proposed new school facilities included in the Capital Facilities Plan as well as the proposed renovation projects will require the construction of impervious surfaces The extent of any imperious cover constructed will vary with each capital facilities project included in the Capital Facilities Plan This issue has been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate h Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any The erosion potential of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan and appropriate control measures have been or will be addressed dunng project-specific environmental review when appropriate. Relevant erosion reduction and control requirements will be met. 2 Air a What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e , dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed'7 If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Various emissions, many construction-related, may result from the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan The air-quality impacts of each project have been or will be evaluated during project-specific environmental review when appropriate Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. b Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal9 If so, generally describe Any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. c Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any. The individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject to project-specific environmental review when appropriate and relevant local approval processes The District will be required to comply with all applicable air regulations and air permit requirements Proposed measures specific to the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 3 Water • a Surface• 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)9 If yes, describe type and provide names If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into There is a network of surface water bodies within the Federal Way School District The surface water bodies that are in the immediate vicinity of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review when appropriate When necessary, the surface water regimes and flow patterns have been or will be researched and incorporated into the designs of the individual projects 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters9 If yes, please describe and attach available plans. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may require work near the surface waters located within the Federal Way School District. Applicable local approval requirements have been or will be satisfied 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected Indicate the source of fill material Information with respect to the placement or removal of fill and dredge material as a component of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be provided during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. Applicable local regulations have been or will be satisfied 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known Any surface water withdrawals or diversions required in connection with the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project- specific environmental review when appropriate 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan Each project included in the Capital Facilities Plan, if located in a floodplain area, will be required to meet applicable local regulations for flood areas. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. 8 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Specific information regarding the discharge of waste materials that may be required as a result of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be provided dunng project-specific environmental review when appropriate Please -see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions b Ground. 1) WiIl groundwater be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to groundwater Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may impact groundwater resources The impact of the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan on Qroundwater resources has been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate Each project is or will be subject to applicable local regulations Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example. Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals agncultural; etc ) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve The discharges of waste material that may take place in connection with the projects included in the Plan have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review c Water Runoff (including storm water) 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known) Where will this water flow'i Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may have stormwater runoff consequences Specific information regarding the stormwater impacts of each project has been or will be provided during project-specific environmental review when appropriate Each project is or will be subject to applicable local stormwater regulations 9 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters9 If so, generally describe . The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may result in the dischargd of waste materials into around or surface waters The specific impacts of each project on ground and surface waters have been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review when appropriate Each project is or will be subject to all applicable regulations regarding the discharge of waste materials into ground and surface waters Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions d Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any Specific measures to reduce or control runoff impacts associated with the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate 4. Plants a Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site deciduous tree alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree fir, cedar, pine, other = shrubs grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants water lily, eelgrass, rrulfoil, other other types of vegetation A variety of vegetative zones are located within the Federal Way School District Inventories of the vegetation located on the sites of the projects proposed in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be developed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate b What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered9 Some of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may require the removal or alteration of vegetation The specific impacts on vegetation of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review when appropriate c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. The specific impacts to these species from the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be determined during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. 10 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST d Proposed landscaping, use of native plans, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any- Measures to preserve or enhance vegetation at the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review when appropriate Each project is or will be subject to applicable local landscaping requirements 5 Animals a Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site birds- hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other. mammals deer, bear, elk, beaver, other- fish bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other- An inventory of species that have been observed on or near the sites of the projects proposed in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be developed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. b List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site Inventories of threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be developed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate c Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. The impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan on migration routes have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate, d Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any Appropriate measures to preserve or enhance wildlife have been or will be determined during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. 11 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 6 Energy and Natural Resources: a What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to-meet the completed project's energy needs) Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc The State Board of Education requires the completion of a life-cycle cost analysis of all heating, lighting, and insulation systems before it will permit specific school projects to proceed The energy needs of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be determined at the time of specific engineering and site design planning when appropriate Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions b Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties'? If so, generally describe The impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan on the solar potential of adjacent projects have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate c What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal'? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Energy conservation measures proposed in connection with the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be considered during project-specific environmental review when appropriate 7 Environmental Health a Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous taste, that could occur as a result of this proposals If so, describe. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will comply with all current codes, standards, rules, and regulations. Individual projects have been or will be subject to project-specific environmental review and local approval at the time they are developed when appropriate. 12 ENVIRONiVIENTAL CHECKLIST b Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example traffic, equipment, operation, other)? A variety of noises from traffic, construction, residential, commercial and industrial areas exists within the Federal Way School District The specific noise sources that may affect the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review when appropriate 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site The District does not anticipate that the projects will create long-term increases in traffic- related or operations-related noise levels. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any. The projected noise impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be evaluated and mitigated during project-specific environmental review when appropriate Each project is or will be subject to applicable local regulations. 8 Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? There are a variety of land uses within the Federal Way School District, including residential, commercial, industrial, institutional, utility, open space, recreational, etc. b Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. The project sites covered under the Capital Facilities Plan have not been used recently for agriculture c Describe any structures on the site The structures located on the proposed sites for the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified and described during project-specific environmental review when appropriate 13 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST d Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? The remodeling and renovation projects will require the demolishment of school structures The structures that will be demolished as a result of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. e What is the current zoning classification of the site9 The sites that are covered under the Capital Facilities Plan have a variety of zoning classifications under the applicable zoning codes Site-specific zoning information has been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review when appropriate f What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Inventories of the comprehensive plan designations for the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be completed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Shoreline master program designations of the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during, project-specific environmental review when appropriate h Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" areas If so, specify Any environmentally sensitive areas located on the sites of the projects included in the Plan have been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project The Federal Way School District currently serves approximately 22,400 students The student population is expected to increase to 23,680 by the year 2006. The District employs approximately 2,800 people j Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Any displacement of people caused by the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be evaluated during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. However, it is not anticipated that the Capital Facilities Plan, or any of the projects contained therein, will displace any people. 14 ENVIRONiVIENTAL CHECKLIST k Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any. Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be subject to project-specific environmental review and local approval when appropriate Proposed mitigating measures will be proposed at that time, if necessary I Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any The compatibility of the specific projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan with existing uses and plans has been or will be assessed as part of the comprehensive planning process and during project-specific environmental review when appropriate 9 Housing a Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, rruddle, or low-income housing No housing units would be provided in connection with the completion of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan b: Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing It is not anticipated that the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will eliminate any housing units The impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan on existing housing have been or will be evaluated during project-specific environmental review when appropn ate. c Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Measures to reduce or control any housing impacts caused by the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. 10 Aesthetics: a What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building matenal(s) proposed The aesthetic impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. 15 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST b What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed9 The aesthetic impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be detemuned during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. c Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any. Appropriate measures to reduce or control the aesthetic impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be determined on a project-specific basis when appropriate. 11 Light and Glare a What type of light or glare will the proposal produce9 What time of day would it mainly occur9 The Iight or glare impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review b Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views') The light or glare impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal9 Off-site sources of light or glare that may affect the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be evaluated during project-specific environmental review when appropriate d Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any Proposed measures to mitigate light and glare impacts have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate 12 Recreation a What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? There are a variety of formal and informal recreational facilities within the Federal Way School District 16 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST b Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe The recreational impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan, including proposed renovated school and support facilities, may enhance recreational opportunities and uses c Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any. Adverse recreational effects of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject to mitigation during project-specific environmental review when appropriate A school site usually provides recreational facilities to the community in the form of play fields and gymnasiums 13 Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site9 If so, generally describe There are no known places or objects listed on, or proposed for such registers on the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan The existence of historic and cultural resources _ on or next to the sites has been or will be addressed in more detail during project-specific environmental review when appropriate b Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. An inventory of historical sues at or near the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be developed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate c Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Appropriate measures have been or will be proposed on a project-specific basis when appropriate 14 Transportation- a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system Show on site plans, if any The impact on public streets and highways of the individual projects included in the Cap•ral Facilities Plan has been or will be addressed dunng project-specific environmental review when appropriate. 17 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST b Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? The relationship between the specific projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan and public transit has been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project elirrunate? An inventory of parking spaces located at the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan and the impacts of specific projects on parking availability has been or will be conducted during project-specific environmental review when appropriate d Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private) The need for new streets or roads, or improvements to existing streets and roads has been or will be addressed dunng project-specific environmental review when appropriate. e Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe - Use of water, rail, or air transportation has been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. The traffic impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate g Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: The mitigation of traffic impacts associated with the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate 15 Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. The District does not anticipate that the projects identified in the Capital Facilities Plan will substantially increase the need for other public services. b Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. 18 ENVIRON vIENTAL CHECKLIST Remodeled/renovated school or facilities will be built with automatic security systems, fire alarms, smoke alarms, heat sensors, and sprinkler systems 16 Utilities: a. Circle utilities currently available at the site. electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other Electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, and sanitary sewer utilities are available at the sites of the projects proposed in the Capital Facilities Plan The types of utilities available at specific project sites have been or will be addressed in more detail dunng project- specific environmental review when appropriate b Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed Utility revisions and construction needs have been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review when appropriate C SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying orr them to make its decision Signature Date Submitted. May 16, 2001 i 19 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them to conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented Respond briefly and in general terms 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water, emissions to air, production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances, or production of noise? To the extent the Capital Facilities Plan makes it more likely that school facilities will be constructed and/or renovated and remodeled, some of these environmental impacts will be more likely Additional impermeable surfaces, such as roofs, parking lots, sidewalks, access roads, and playgrounds could increase stormwater runoff, which could enter surface or ground waters Heating systems, emergency generators, and other school equipment that is installed pursuant to the Capital Facilities Plan could result in air emissions The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan should not require the production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances, with the possible exception of the storage of diesel fuel or gasoline for emergency generating equipment The District does not anticipate a significant increase in the production of noise from its facilities, although the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will increase the District's student capacities Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are. Proposed measures to mitigate any such increases described above have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate Stormwater detention and runoff will meet applicable County and/or City requirements and may be subject to National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ("NPDES") permitting requirements. Discharges to air will meet applicable air pollution control requirements. Fuel oil will be stored in accordance with local and state requirements. 2 How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? The Capital Facilities Plan itself will have no impact on these elements of the environment These impacts have been or will be addressed in more detail during project-specific environmental review when appropriate The projects included in the Plan are not likely to generate severe impacts on fish or marine life. 20 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are. Specific measures to protect and conserve plants, animals, and fish cannot be identified at this time Specific mitigation proposals have been or will be identified, however, during project- specific environmental review when appropriate 3 How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? The construction of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will require the consumption of energy Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be constructed in accordance with applicable energy efficiency standards 4 How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection, such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? The Capital Facilities Plan and individual projects contained therein should have no impact on these resources Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are Appropriate measures have been or will be proposed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. Updates of this Plan will be coordinated with King County and the cities of Federal Way, Kent, Des Moines, and Auburn as part of the Growth Management Act process, one of the purposes of which is to protect environmentally sensitive areas. To the extent the District's facilities planning process is part of the overall growth management planning process, these resources are more likely to be protected 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans9 The Capital Facilities Plan will not have any impact on land or shoreline use that is incompatible with existing comprehensive plans, land use codes, or shoreline management plans. The District does not anticipate that the Capital Facilities Plan or the projects contained therein will directly affect land and shoreline uses in the area served by the District Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: No measures to avoid or reduce land use impacts resulting from the Capital Facilities Plan or the projects contained therein are proposed at this time 21 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 6 How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities' The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may create temporary increases in the District's need for public services and utilities Upon the completion of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan, however, the District does not anticipate that its need for public services and utilities will increase substantially beyond existing levels Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are No measures to reduce or respond to such demands are proposed at this time. 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment The Capital Facilities Plan will not conflict with any laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. 22 #CPA-2001-2(H) CITY OF KENT FINANCE DEPT ANNUAL CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT 2002 - 2007 Capital improvement Program Sources of Funds Amounts in 000's I ' Street Fund ' Councilmanic Bond 9/° Utilb y Revenue Proceeds - i Bonds 27% i 10% I - I _ Utility Funds Voted Public Safety 17% Bonds 19% � I . , Capital Improvement Alternative Funding Fund Sources-Parks _Grants - ' 12% � 1% Other Funding 4% Sources 1'/e 1 I 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Total Sources of Funds Capital Improvement Fund 4,329 2,735 2,775 2,813 2,805 2,950 18,407 Grants 2,532 945 340 1,600 1,450 6,867 Other Funding Sources 368 173 83 109 109 234 1,076 Alternative Funding Sources-Parks - 284 455 315 75 675 1,804 Voted Public Safety Bonds 30,000 30,000 Councilmanic Bond Proceeds 11,216 20,500 10,900 42,616 Street Fund 3,210 3,563 190 3,049 2,691 1,144 13,847 Utilby Revenue Bonds 10,000 5,125 15,125 Utility Funds 4,313 4,822 6102 5,571 3,152 2,178 26,138 Total Sources of Funds 23,436 44,109 41,050 12,197 26,457 8,631 155,880 EXHIBIT "G" I -46 #' 2002 - 2007 Capital Improvement Program Projects Forecast Amounts in 000's i Public Safety 23% Transportation 18% rape- Parks, Recreation & _ Community - -_ - - - Services 16% i i Utility Fund General Projects /° Government 25 ° 20/o 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Total Projects Transportation 7,526 3,852 8,790 3,074 4,491 1,044 28,777 Public Safety 535 30,350 350 350 3,350 350 35,285 Parks, Recreation 5,263 4,190 2,913 2,307 3,069 4,164 21,906 &Community Services - General Government 6,099 1,195 13,195 1,195 7,570 1,195 30,449 Utility Fund Projects 4,013 4 522 16,002 6,271 4,877 3,778 39,463 Total Projects 23,435 44,108 41,250 13,19T 23,357 10,531 15s,880 I -47 cw CIP 6yr plan 02 xis 10f102001 2002-2007 CAPITAL IMPROVaSi-NT PROGRAM SOURCES AND USES SUMMARY - AMOUNTS IN 000'S Is Total 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Sources of Funds Capital Improvement Fund 7,654 1,584 1 220 1,220 1,220 1,220 1,220 CIP Fund-BEET 2nd Ctr 10,723 2,745 1,5t5 1,555 1,593 "585 1,730 Youthfreen 769 259 155 35 100 100 100 Street Fund 13847 3,210 3,553 190 3,049 2,691 1,144 C.: -ciimanic Bond Proceeds 34,241 11,216 15,500 7,525 Councilmanic Bonds Shops Facility 8 375 5,000 3,375 Voted Public Safety Bonds 30,000 30,C00 Donations and Contributions 140 40 100 Other Funding Sources 167 99 6 8 9 9 34 Alternative Funding Sources-Parks 1,804 284 455 315 75 675 Grants-Parks Projects 5,778 2,143 745 215 1,225 1,450 Grants-Street Projects 1,089 339 200 125 375 Water Fund 10,225 1,347 1,520 2,822 3,099 628 809 Sevier Utility Fund 3,086 585 452 677 440 454 468 Drainage Utility Fund 12,827 2 381 2,640 2,603 2,032 2,070 901 Utility Revenue Bonds 15,125 10,000 5,125 Total Sources of Funds 155,880 23,436 44,109 41,050 12,197 26,457 8,631 Transportation Corridor Improvements 6,495 890 1,180 1,720 1,180 1,525 Arterials 3817 1,017 E50 500 Soo 1,150 Intersection &Signal Improvements 3,799 1,524 925 450 250 650 Other Improvements 14,666 4095 - 1097 6120 1,144 1166 1044 Total Transportation 28,777 7,526 3,852 8,790 3,074 4,491 1,044 Public Safety Fire & Life Safety Requests 1,835 460 275 275 275 275 275 Police 450 75 75 75 75 75 75 Public Safety Facilities 33 000 30 000 3 000 Total Public Safety 35,285 53S 30,350 350 350 3,350 350 Parks, Recreation 8t Community Services 21,906 5,263 4,190 2,913 2,307 3,069 4,164 General Government General Government Facilities 17,145 2,045 345 7,345 345 6,720 345 Other General Government 13 304 4 054 850 5 850 850 850 850 Total General Government 30,449 6,099 1,195 13,195 1,195 7,570 1,195 Utility Fund Projects Sanitary Sewer 2,486 485 352 577 340 354 368 Stormwater Drainage 16,227 2,281 2,740 2,703 2,932 2,870 2,701 Water Projects 9,625 1,247 1,420 2,722 2,999 528 709 Easthill M21nt Facility 10,000 10,000 Shops Renovation 1,125 1,125 Total Utility Fund Projects 39,463 4,013 4,522 16,002 6,271 4,877 3,778 Total All Projects 155,880 23,436 4.,109 41,250 13,197 23,357 10,631 I -48 TRANSPORTATION 2002-2007 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AMOUNTS IN 000's Total 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Sources of Funds Grants 1,089 389 200 125 375 Councilmanic Band Proceeds 14,441 4,416 8,500 1,525 Street Fund 13247 3,110 3,463 90 2,949 2591 1044 Total Sources of Funds 28,777 7,526 3,852 8,790 3,074 4,491 1,04 Protects Funded Kent Station Street/Traffic 2,900 2,900 Corridors 228th Corridor- West Corridor 5,785 180 1,180 1,720 1,180 1,525 196th Corridor 710 710 Arterials 256th Street Widening 767 767 212th Street Rehab 650 650 132nd Ave Improvements(240th-244th) 250 250 72nd Avenue(196th-200th) 500 500 84tn Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation 500 500 Military Road Improvements 150 150 116th Ave Imp (256th-KK(SR516)) 500 500 Central Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation 500 500 Intersection &Road Improvements James &Central Intersection Improve 318 318 4th&Willis Roundabout - 600 200 400 WVH &277th Intersection Improvement 250 250 94th Ave @ Canyon Dr Traffic Signal 200 200 1-5 &277th Intersection Improvement 475 275 200 Military Rd&277th intersection Improve 650 650 116th &248th Signal 250 250 124th &248th Signal 250 250 132nd &248th Street Improvement 806 806 Other Improvements Miscellaneous Asphalt Overlays 3,299 497 517 538 560 582 605 Slurry Seal Program 400 50 75 75 75 75 50 Sidewalk Rehabilitabon and Installation 1,800 300 300 300 300 300 300 Traffic Signal Controller Cabinet Replacemenl 40 40 Neighborhood Traffic Control 75 75 City Wide Guardrail& Safety Improvement 30 30 Street Striping Program 522 83 85 87 89 89 89 Signal Battery Backup 600 120 120 120 120 120 Easthill Maint Facility 5,000 5,000 Total Projects Funded 28,777 7,526 3,852 8,790 3,074 4,491 1,044 d-49 cw CIP 6yr plan 02 xls 10I302001 PUBLIC SAFETY 2002-2007 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AMOUNTS IN 000's Total 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Sources of Funds Councilmanic Bonds 3,000 3,000 Voted Public Safety Bands 30,000 30 COO CIP Revenues Required 2,285 535 350 350 350 350 350 Total Sources of Funds 35,285 535 30,350 350 350 3,350 350 Fire&Life Safety Projects Fire Equipment Replacement Fund 1,400 400 200 200 200 200 200 Breathing Apparatus/Pass Alarm Replacement Program 40 40 Hurst Toot Replacement 20 20 Other Fire&Life Safety Projects 375 75 75 75 75 75 Total Approved Fire&Life Safety Projects 1,835 460 275 275 275 275 275 Police Projects Radios 75 75 Mist Police Projects 375 75 75 75 75 75 Total Approved Police Projects 450 75 75 75 75 75 75 Public Safety Facilities Projects Municipal Court Budding 3,000 3,000 Other Public Safety Facility Improvements 30,000 30 000 Subtotal Public Safety Facilites 33,000 - 30,000 - - 3,000 - Total Public Safety Projects 35,285 535 30,350 350 350 3,350 350 PARKS,RECREATION AND COMMUNITY SERVICL 2002-2007 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AMOUNTS IN 000 s TOTAL 21202 2003 2004 200S 2CO3 2007 Sources of Funds R_ET 2nd Otr 10 723 2 745 1,515 1,555 1 593 1 535 1,730 CIP Revenues 425 So 75 75 75 75 75 Dona;ons/Conlnbutons 140 40 100 Alternative Funding 1,804 284 455 315 75 675 Fee-m-lieu 25 25 Youthrfeen 753 269 165 35 100 too too State Fuel Tax St a 8 8 9 9 9 Councdmanic Bonds 2 lco 2 1C0 General Fund 91 91 Grants 5 778 2 143 745 215 1 225 1 450 Total Sources of Funds 21,906 5,263 4,190 2,913 2,307 3,069 4,164 Proi-cts Sports Fields Soccer Field Renovation Sao 800 Service Club Sallfields 2 450 80 120 1 250 1,= Service Club Park Acgwsdion 750 750 East H 11 Youth Sports Complex 3C0 303 Commons PlaFeld Renovations 1 040 1 040 Park Development Land Acquisitor, 453 150 75 75 75 75 Uplands Playfield Improvements 43 40 223th Comdcr Parkrfra0head(Russell Woods) 25 25 Irterurban Trad 33 30 Green River Corridor 20 25 Grant Matching Funds 450 5o 100 75 75 75 75 East WII Youth Sports Faality Development 3 530 3 380 150 State Part Development 3,0 360 International Parks Acgwsition/Develapment 13 10 Tcwn Square Park 1 1C0 1,100 Lake Fenwick Park Development 75 75 Rivenvalk I Riverview Park Development 562 12 550 Youthlreen Capital Projects fic: 269 35 1o0 100 100 Clark Lake Development 7Ca 700 4'fest Hill Amphdhealer 83 80 Mill Creek Gould Property Development SW 500 BMX Property Donation 2C0 200 Green River Corridor Acquisition SCo SCo East Hit l Park Land Acquisition Soo SCo Neighborhood Parks Development _ Canterbury Park Development 339 339 West Hill Park Development (Seattle Water) 777 Soo 177 132nd Street Park Development 76: 44 750 S 272nd SL Neighborhood Park Development 620 - 20 600 Turnkey Pah Acquisition&Parking Lot Devel 200 200 Panther Lake Neighborhood Park Acquisition 310 310 htal0r Capital&Lifecycle Renovations Downtown Sidewalk Replawmeat Gateways 355 175 90 90 Spnngwcod Park Improvements 65 65 Seven Oaks Park Improvements 35 35 West Fenwck Renovations 175 175 Kwanis Tot Lot 91 Improvements 40 40 Tudor Square Renovations 30 30 Pine Tree Park Improvements 3C0 300 Tumkey Park Renovations 213 63 150 Life Cycle 1,500 250 250 250 250 250 250 Demolition of Rental Houses 50 25 25 Van Doren s Park Improvements 45 45 Lake Mendian Park Improvements 2C0 200 . Green Rvr D15abled Fishing AccessrSceing Tract C 3C0 300 Botanical Garden 25 25 Big Blue Mcbile Computer Lab 65 65 OH-Leash Park 30 15 15 Trail Improvements 51 6 a 1 9 9 9 City Arts Program 91 91 Planning-Architecture 3 Engineering ArchLtect l Engineering 130 15 20 20 25 25 25 Master Plans 70 20 10 10 10 10 10 Recreation Fao6ty FeasibTry Study 35 35 Svnmming Pool Feasibility Study _ 40 15 25 Total Project; 21,906 5,263 4,190 2,913 2.307 3,069 4,164 I- 51 GENERAL GOVERNMENT FACILITIES - 2002-2007 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AMOUNTS IN 000'S Total 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Sources of Funds Councilmanic Bond Proceeds 15,075 1,700 7,000 6,375 CIP Revenues Required 2,070 345 345 345 345 345 345 Total Sources of Funds 17,145 2,045 345 7,345 345 6,720 345 Protects Other Facility Repairs&Improvements 1,800 300 300 300 300 300 300 Campus Expansion and Renovation 6,700 1,700 2,000 3,000 Golf Complex Improvements 270 45 45 45 45 45 45 Subtotal General Gov't Facilities 8,770 2,045 345 2,345 345 3,345 345 EH Maintenance Facility General Government•CIP 25% 5,000 5,000 Shops Renovation 3,375 3 375 Subtotal Maintenance Facility 8,375 - - 5,000 - 3,375 - Total Projects 17,145 2,045 345 7,345 345 6,720 345 I - 52 OTHER GOVERNMENT PROJECTS 2002-2007 DEPARTMENT REQUESTS AMOUNTS IN 000's Total 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Proposed Revenue Capital Improvement Fund 2,904 654 450 450 450 450 450 From Utility&Street Funds 2,400 400 400 400 400 400 400 Counalmanic Bonds 8 000 3 000 5 000 Total Proposed Revenue 13,304 4,054 850 5,850 850 850 850 Prefects Funded Development Rights Acquisition 50 50 Miscellaneous Projects 755 255 100 100 100 100 100 Various Department Equipment 299 49 50 50 50 50 50 Kent Station Infrastructure,Arch &Eng,reenng 1,000 1,000 Automation Projects 11 200 2 700 700 5 700 700 700 700 Total Projects Funded 13,304 4,054 850 5,850 850 850 850 I- 53 cw CIP syr plan 02. 13 1013=001 WATER,SEWER AND STORMWATER DRAINAGE 2002-2007 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AMOUNTS IN 000's Total 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 - 2007 Sources of Funds Water Fund 9,625 1247 1,420 2,722 2,999 528 709 Drainage Utility Fund 12,227 2,281 2,740 2,503 1,932 1,970 801 Revenue Bonds 15,125 10,000 5125 Sewer Utility Fund 2 486 485 362 577 340 354 368 Total Sources of Funds 39,463 4,013 4,522 15,802 5,271 7,977 1,878 Proiects Funded Sanitary Sewer Remote Telemetry Upgrades-Phase If 93 46 47 Kent Station Improvements 136 136 Easthdl Shop 250 250 Miscellaneous Sewer Lines 2007 303 315 327 340 354 368 Total Sanitary Sewer 2,486 485 362 577 340 354 368 Storrnwater Drainage Management Horseshoe Acres Pump Station 130 100 10 10 10 Garrison Creek Storrs Improvements 274 130 144 Oulfall Treatment 976 100 876 Soos Creek Basin Improvements 6,207 528 419 1,460 1,000 900 1,900 Miscellaneous Drainage Improvements 4,365 658 684 712 740 770 801 Drainage Improvements wl Road Improvements 3,369 519 400 250 1,000 1.200 Endangered Species Act 463 100 110 121 132 Remote Telemetry Upgrades-Phase II 93 46 47 NPOES Permit 250 100 50 50 50 Easlhiil Nlaint Facility 5,000 5,000 Shops Renovation 563 563 Totall Shop 790 100 Total Stormwater Drainage 21,790 2,281 2,740 7,703 2,932 3,433 2,701 Water Projects East Hill Reservoir 2 850 Soo 1,050 1,300 Impoundment Project(124th-118thl288th-304th) 2,700 300 1.200 1,200 Miscellaneous Water Improvements 2,047 309 321 334 347 361 375 Remote Telemetry Upgrades-Phase 1 277 137 140 -Water Conservation 1,053 287 125 138 152 167 184 Pump Station.3(Replacement) 75 75 3-Year Lrg httr&Vault Replacement Program 67 33 34 Water Source Development 360 350 Kent Station Improvements 56 56 Update Kent's Water Comprehensive Plan 150 150 Shops Renovation 562 562 Easthill Mamt Facility 5,000 5 000 Total Water 15,187 1,247 1,420 7,722 2,999 1,090 719 Total Projects Funded 39,463 4,013 4,522 16,002 6,271 4,B77 3,778 I-54 cw CIP 6yr plan 02 xis 10130r2001 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, amending the Kent Zoning Map to change the zoning designations as follows (1) from Mobile Home Park (MHP) and Medium Density Multifamily Residential (MR-M), to General Commercial (GC) for property located at 1027 and 1035 West Srmth Street(CPZ- 2001-1), (2) from Single Family Residential, 6 05 units per acre (SR-6) to Community Commercial (CC) for property located at 27220 154th Avenue Southeast (CPZ-2001-2); (3) from Single Family Residential, 4 53 units per acre(SR- 4 5) to Single Family Residential, 8.71 units per acre (SR-8) for property located at 2635 South 260th Street(CPZ-2001- 3), (4) from Single Family Residential, 4 53 units per acre (SR-4 5), to Single Family Residential, 6 05 units per acre (SR-6) for property located at the southwest corner of the intersecting right-of-way for Southeast 252nd Street and 114th Avenue Southeast, and at 25218 113th Avenue Southeast(CPZ-2001-4),(5) from Single Family Residential, 3 63 units per acre (SR-3), to Single Family Residential, 605 units per acre (SR-6), for the adjacent properties located at 25003 114th Avenue Southeast and 11223 Southeast 248th Street (CPZ-2001-5), and (6) from Garden (Low) Density Multifamily, 16 units per acre (MR-G), to Community Commercial(CC), for property located at 13303 and 13307 Kent-Kangley Road(CPZ-2001-6). WHEREAS, pursuant to the Washington Growth Management Act ("GMA"), the City of Kent accepts applications for comprehensive plan amendments once each year, and WHEREAS, the City of Kent recewed applications to amend the Comprehensive Plan's land use plan map designations and six (6) of those applications 1 2001 Zoning Amendments involve properties requesting corresponding amendments to the zoning map designation of the following parcels (1) 1027 and 1035 West Smith Street (CPZ-2001-1), (2) 27220 154th Avenue Southeast (CPZ-2001-2), (3) 2635 South 260th Street (CPZ-2001-3), (4) the adjacent properties located at the southwest comer of the intersecting rights-of-way for Southeast 252nd Street and 114th Avenue Southeast, and 25218-113th Avenue Southeast(CPZ-2001-4), (5) 25003-114th Avenue Southeast and 11223 SE 248th (CPZ- 2001-5); and (6) 13303 and 13307 Kent-Kangley Road(CPZ-2001-6), which applications were received in Kent, Washington, by the deadline of September 4, 2001, and WHEREAS, the Kent Land Use &Planning Board held a public hearing on the proposed comprehensive plan and zoning map amendments on December 10, 2001, and made the following recommendations: (1) the denial of CPZ-2001-1, (2) the modification of CPZ-2001-4, and(2)the approval of the staff recommendations regarding CPZ—2001-2, CPZ-2001-3, CPZ-2001-5, and CPZ-2001-6, and WHEREAS, on February 5, 2002, the Kent City Council approved the zoning amendments as follows: 1 For property located at 1027 and 1035 West Smith Street(CPZ-2001-1) zoning map amendment from Mobile Home Park (MHP) and Medium Density Multifamily Residential, 23 units per acre(MR-M), to General Commercial (GC), 2 For property located at 27220-154th Avenue Southeast(CPZ-2001-2)zoning map amendment from Single Family Residential (SR-6), 6 05 units per acre, to Community Commercial(CC),with the condition that the subject parcel shall not be permitted to have direct vehicular access to 154th Avenue Southeast to serve any non-residential land use development, 3 For property located at 2635 South 260th Street (CPZ-2001-3), zoning map amendment from Single Family Residential (SR-4 5), 4 53 units per acre, to Single Family Residential (SR-8), 8 71 units per acre, with an intent to seek a subsequent rezone to Multifamily Townhouse, 16 units per acre (MR-T16) , 4 For the adjacent properties ocated at the southwest corner of the intersecting right-of-way for Southeast 252nd Street and 114th Avenue Southeast, and at 25218 113th Avenue Southeast (CPZ-2001-4) a zoning map amendment from 2 2001 Zoning Amendments Single Family Residential (SR-4 5), 4.53 units per acre to Single Family Residential (SR-6), 6 05 units per acre, 5. For the adjacent properties located at 25003 114th Avenue Southeast and 11223 Southeast 248th Street(CPZ-2001-5), zoning map amendment from Single Family Residential(SR-3), 3 63 units per acre, to Single Family Residential (SR-6), 6 05 units per acre, and 6 For property located at 13303 and 13307 Kent-Kangley Road (CPZ-2001-6), zoning map amendment from Garden (Low) Density Multifamily, 16 units per acre (MR-G), to Community Commercial (CC); NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City of Kent zoning map is hereby amended to establish a new zoning map designation for the property located at 1027 and 1035 West Smith Street, Kent, Washington from a zoning designation of Mobile Home Park(MIS') and Medium Density Multifamily Residential, 23 units per acre (MR-M), to General Commercial(GC) and as depicted in the attached Exhibit"A"and incorporated herem by this reference (CPZ-2001-1) SECTION2. The City of Kent zoning map is hereby amended to establish a new zoning map designation for the property located at 27220-154th Avenue Southeast, Kent, Washington, and legally described on the attached Exhibit `B1" from a zoning designation of Single-Family Residential (SR-6), 6 05 units per acre to Community Commercial (CC) and as depicted in the attached Exhibit "132" and incorporated herein by this reference (CPZ-2001-2), with the condition that the subject parcel shall not be permitted to have direct vehicular access to 154th Avenue Southeast to serve any non- residential land use development. 3 2001 Zoning Amendments SECTION 3. The City of Kent zoning map is hereby amended to 10 establish a new zoning map designation for the property located at 2635 South 260th Street, Kent, Washington from a zoning designation of Single-Family Residential (SR- 4 5), 4 53 units per acre to Single Family Residential (SR-8), 8 71 units per acre, with an intent to seek a subsequent rezone to Multifamily Townhouse, 16 units per acre (MR- T16), and as depicted in the attached Exhibit "C" and incorporated herein by this reference (CPZ-2001-3) SECTION 4. The City of Kent zoning map is hereby amended to establish a new zoning map designation for the adjacent properties located at the southwest comer of the intersecting nghts-of-way for Southeast 252nd Street and 114th Avenue Southeast, and at 25218-113th Avenue Southeast, Kent, Washington from a zoning designation of Single Family Residential (SR-4.5), 4.53 units per acre to Single Fatnily Residential (SR- 6), 6 05 units per acre, and as depicted in the attached Exhibit "D" and incorporated herein by this reference (CPZ-2001-4). SECTION 5. The City of Kent zoning map is hereby amended to establish a new zoning map designation for the adjacent properties located at 25003-114th Avenue Southeast and 11223 Southeast 248th Street, Kent, Washington from a zoning designation of Single-Family Residential (SR-3), 3.63 units per acre, to Single Family Residential (SR-6), 6.05 units per acre, as depicted in the attached Exhibit "E" and incorporated herein by this reference (CPZ-2001-5). SECTION 6. The City of Kent zoning map is hereby amended to establish a new zoning map designation for the property located at 13303 and 13307 Kent-Kangley Road, Kent, Washington from a zoning designation of Garden (Low) Density' Multifamily, 16 units per acre (MR-G) to Community Commercial (CC) and as depicted in the attached Exhibit "F" and incorporated herein by this reference (CPZ-2001-6) 4 2001 Zoning Amendments SECTION 7. - Severabikty If any one or more sections, subsections, or sentences of this Ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect SECTION 8. -Effective Date This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty(30) days from and after the date of passage and publication as provided by law JIM WHITE, MAYOR ATTEST BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM TOM BRUBAKER, CITY ATTORNEY 5 2001 Zoning Amendments PASSED day of 2002 APPROVED day of 12002 PUBLISHED day of 2002 I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No. passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the City of Kent as hereon indicated BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK P'TthWrdm=ce nmgMVP nd-2001&c 6 100I Zoning Amendments Qp E- - , a ftz; y a. OCV L C� a ` N pea s+ .. c a a ; `' 0 c a Mc aE ' ph 0 �'' 3 � c m d Y cm f4 0 � �. C N m a � 3 His` i � u► -i IA c I.il: l x a aox c+i cn c > F— O a ca -� W o H E Q - 0o d ? � � Cox m N 3^ a S� Z Z N gala age o a s w 0 mw cn 5 cs� as oC c t III N 3AV NOSdWOH-L ® U U Ilp gb z O Z C im o uiyse °DI will Cox EXHIBIT "A" Exhibit B1 Lot 6, Edaall A. Rask Addition, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 53 of plats, page 11, in King County, Washington, SUBJECT To! 1) Easemartts, restriccions and slope rights as disclosed by the recorded plat of Edwall A Rask Addition, 2) Nocice by City of Hent recorded under Rec No 9903130889 which is a re-record oP Roc No 9712190879i 3) City of Kent ordinance No 3447 recorded under Rec No 19991012000149 regarding Water supply system, 4) Noriee by King County Water District No 111 •zc � L L O � tj Cc a T� C N MC LL 3 � 3m V mCM • E U L O 9 L ! d e e O ^A C O G m O z e Z d N 7 A O m L A m m LL C 6 7 {Il 1 m 6 mC 3 HV6 xu. fu. HJ H C� c 40 nuUL eF x co X C ch M c mz " 00 M CO CO Z z 0 W O WO •- CV) a V � w x z r_ x _ O co c g Ito Eel C0 iX n X . . . '=�I _ Z CN , N 3S 3AV co 0 -z e 0 vQlv LID 75 x co 0 ® I g75 a = - � x V � Q ao } � f 1RIV x g x % 00 x � ' EXHIBIT B2 T N .z : 9 m o A N N C a C N N 3 ` ` a Y NJ 2 a I N N 3 A > m oo qA _°cm � c o w `oo . O N m 6 o-Ci3 Yd � � Ea HJ Val a Cl , : ® � x a 41 41 41 414 � m � �141414f 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 i ?; N 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 _ H 414141IN NW 41414141 ''M'N 41 41 41 41 41 41 4141 41 G MA 41414141 IN 414141 IN Y. w N 414141414141414(414141e X Epp N41414141IN41 41 41 41 IN IN N X X mi •1 31 y1 �31 31•}1•}1 31 S m 2 Cl 14141�41 41 41 41 41 }14141 00 N Z I`l14141 414141414141 -NM 4i Ir. Z Q G 9`41 41 IN`N 44 IN 4141 41 IN 41 41 4141 41 N4141 IN41414141 4141414a41 41 41 41 41 4�. . 9,N,N IN 41,N N41 4141414141 4141� _ w Mc N4141 41 IN IN IN 41 4141 IN IN 4141 41r ca V 4141 4l 41414141 4!4141 4141 IN mx 41yi41 414141 4I4141 Nl 0 7= - Nx H4141 41 41414141 4141 41414141414141a4141 41'M j W X _ _ I d141 'N'll 1�H 11 IN N 919141 N g191�H 91IN w �J$•+ N,14�,M IN N�d,1�N 44,14�31�1 31 31-44�*4�•,M 41 IN �'1 �IN SIN IN �I,41 Z T,9TTMT T41TT 41 IN TT 41 TT41T T 4 V 11.`lN1�`INI.`,N 411�`lN�',0IN'�`4�',N1 �.,N1 IN ` IN1.`'N1`31`N `N`N.`N1�`'N1�`,N1 .% i..i 'X N ,IN ,TI 41 IN �'T1�`T1T�,T1T IMM411�,1 IN IN IN ,TILT-MIN T �T IN 41 T T TN TIN IN IN TT T TT TT x OX .`}NINI`,NIN1`,NIN1"N1'N`�'N'11 $,11.`,N1--N1IN.`N-411�11 `'NIN1.I,IIN1 II ^x TTTTTTT4IT 414i41 41 41 41 41 TTTT 91 rt yy'm 41 41 IN IN 44 4141 IN 41414141 41 ri 41414141414141 41414141 4! O IN 4141414141 N4141 4191•N 414141 IN IN 414141 o `s 1-AIN41414141y141 4I41414141414141 •}I•NdId1Allm Il H - 00 A 4"I141414141414141 414141414 *-NINI141 41414141IN41 0 4✓414141 y1 41 41 41 41 41 a1 414141 IN.41 IN 4"41 IN 414I414141 �. wx 41y14141414f41 41 41 41 4i IN IN IN IN IN IN IN IN 41414"4141 0 eoc G •N414l414141•N41N41 'IN CNM IN Z ,�..� N 414"IN 41 4I414I 4141414141414141 4iy1.31414141 414141414141 41414141�H�H4i41414141 y �+ 41 41414I41 41 41 41 4141 41 IN IN nINdldld1�11 ri�+ri 41-m-N 4,H4ldl wx 414141414141 41 41 IN IN IN 4141 4141414141414141A41 41 41 41 41IN 4141 91d141d1^N 41 N IN IN IN4141IN4141 i1.114141,N,N41 "41 41 7 ,N4144IN41ININ41.AIN414141IN 41INNIN 41414I4141 41 0 4IN--m-i41 41 41 41 41 41IN41IN'N E Dn 414141 IN41414141 4l R IN IN414".41IN414144IN414191 ll 4144 a 4141414141 41 4141414141 IN IN IN IN 41414141 IN T� nX IN 9414l41 414141414"INI14i414a w 1-' NIN IN IN 41 4 Y 4 8 � N 4144INN 4141 IN 44 41 41 41 41 41y "ri yl S 4141414141 414H41 4 l;4,w 4I4t N INIm � $� } x U OQ nx N H Q 414141 N �H41 m 414141d1 �� ¢s ' x ox 41414141 �+ 414141$I y !5 Cax IN`H414l`N 4141 �E! }141 44 IN`N 41414141 4141414, x m ;�. : ,•- ,-_� mx H41414i4141414i $ . N 14141�4141��4141 _ 2e-T<.i i•:-C {` 14141 TTTTT 1414141 414"4141 d414141 414141 �a m< H41414141'WIN 4141 •s€ $!$ \ r=3 N ^ N414141414141iii EXHIBIT "C" F � c •z c L w am+ y a+ �, a A > m EAo Am cm LLC G z 936 N Nm 6 o-ci 3 Q G76 Z16 $ a ulJ w 7 t� c 144 - d O -- - o CO 0 O 13 x' - = J 1 ZQOo W o iq ll 0 1 w ❑ °z dl dl dl V♦•N Q � � r Q 9l dl dl d1.3191-H 7[1 /{y }, a J 3' YI YI YI YI y, 3S /\V Y�� Idl d131l3 %m%14l1 •NIP '41 'NdiT a dl dl 91 IN IN IN•N•N IN IN dl ns `• 4 •N dl 91 d1-N 41,N-N-N 'N d141 �Y 31 d131di,11-N41-N dl ❑ - N dldldldl•N•N41•il i d1 IN IN N Cl �I H�IINININ-I•N41-N ..�IIN•NN•N•N141IN•31•N41a 3S IN IN ININ^N14ININ-N%N0MrAw dldl•�(dldl ail dly ' _ __ 41 IN 913I dl .. _... d1d131d1 91dIdIIN91 .v.vy.N,N.N _ il`NIN4"IN IN IN`N IN IN "4141 74� 114441-m41IN Yf � ]Ila is Ed IFU iF { Su 1 %N-Na y 'aldldl $191dIdIlldldl � d191d1 i b V91 91AI31•N,N IN IN n �11� rsva+�l�la�iavia�ia�i - — - EXHIBIT "D" F`c � • Ln c x NA O fA ` (A m R q M p N C p i3 L e CR & 0 6. 3 � �y z N Y � 1 C 9 cs o ^m '$ m C m N m d A 3 {6 1q 6 z J. U. Ln .:l (A c V c w Idle � C W a ■ r 41 z ° Z z° J� wc w0 oIx nn a ❑ 3 L � QN •N•N•N•N ' Q C 41 IN Vrl 4" IN •N•N � _ •'. •'- a L L IN4"•N 9 IN IN •DIJ d _ J �I�dldldt i•N Id1 •H o• Q 4191�1 _ •}I� IN CO) dl•N•31 91 •3i•} � O - 4•N•H•N _ dl - •H Z ;^€l d�Idi dl •11 'N'N L] •H dl - - - - •N dl•H41�.y1I ' -- - BI•N 1. 9FiF914iti 41-M r "`H•N +tsar.�_ =n..:iFy..= - ,_,w:S:' y.v.y•N•N ' _ a 'N'm - _ p ,3 a sab ng� EXHIBIT "E" w LZ C 1rz� o o 0 OU • ; a ol m m y m h o > a e a m ea om 3 ; 3 � o W z 2• wZ a �. N m 6 ,ci 3 G 6 f W � � Ifl J y ,' (� C C I41 C C U 44 1 , 144 a sw `, m4r4l IN 41B I a, m 3 0CLf Q ' o 3S 3AV SU m z AT 41-Mll Z 0 4141414141 o ZQQ G O JW `o 414141?' 1L 191 . 414141Q � 4I i, r 414141 41.N.y w O 0 ? N4141yN414i41 y U 414141yy4141 `u VI C ccy= Z ca 0 1n 5 41 co o 41414I414141 ---- - ,� Z -N4141�14141, - -=wc 'r 114141 ti 141414 4i 4141 s a,� 414141 a �•'��= % E x � y414141T .41 41 41 41 41-. - •41 41 41 41 41r � $� --� o 3nvzE Lf) � - E EXHIBIT "F" ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, amendmg Section 12.13.160 of the Kent City Code to amend the school impact fee schedule WHEREAS, the City of Kent adopted a school impact fee program as authorized by the Growth Management Act and RCW 82.02 050; and WHEREAS, Chapter 12.13 070 of the Kent City Code requires that the Capital Facilities Plans of the school districts be submitted to the City of Kent on an annual basis for City Council review,and that such review shall occur to conjunction with any update of the Capital Facilities Plan element of the City's Comprehensive Plan, and WHEREAS, the Kent and Federal Way School Districts have requested amendments to the text of the Comprehensive Plan to reflect proposed changes to impact fees resulting from new student population generated by new single-family and multifamily residential development, and WHEREAS, after a public hearing on December 10,2001,before the Land Use and Planning Board, the City Council on February 5, 2002, approved Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA-2001-2(G) to include the Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent and Federal Way School Districts, which include a change in proposed impact fees in the Federal Way School District to $2,616 for single-family and $896 for multifamily units, and which included no change for the Kent School District, and 1 School Impact Fee-2001 WHEREAS, it is necessary to amend section 12 13 160 of the Kent City Code to reflect the Comprehensive Plan amendment that established a new base fee schedule for the Federal Way School District of$2,616 for single-family and $896 for multifamily units, NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS SECTION 1. Section 12 13 160 of the Kent City Code is hereby amended as follows. See. 12.13.160. Base fee schedule. The following fee shall be assessed for the indicated types of development School District Single Family Multi-family Multi-familv studio Kent,No 415 $3,782 00 $2,329 00 $ 000 Federal Way,No. 210 Q',''^ S 83000 $ 000 2 616 00 $ 896.00 SECTION2. - Severabtltty If any one or more sections, subsections, or sentences of this Ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance and the same shall j remain in full force and effect. SECTION 3. - Effective Date This ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty(30) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law JIM WHITE, MAYOR 2 School Impact Fee-2001 ATTEST BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM TOM BRUBAKER, CITY ATTORNEY PASSED day of 2002 APPROVED day of 2002 PUBLISHED day of 2002 I I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No. passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the City of Kent as hereon indicated BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK P 1Cm110rdwwccl chco11rMnt-2W I doc 3 School Impact Fee-2001 F ! 1 i EGenRi - ouncil Meetizio Data e$ruary 19, 2002 Cat��xy 'Ronaent CaleCd�ar 1. SUBJECT- COUNTRY CLUB DIVISION II BILL Q� SALE - ACCEPT ' I 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENTS As recommended by tho Public Works Director, accept the Bill of Sale for Count Club Village Division II submitted by SWG Construction, Tnc. for continuous operation and maintenance of 1160 feet of 0iroet improvements and 1300 feet of storm sewers . Bonds are ,tq be Teleased after the one-year maintenance period. This project is located at 25244 136th Avenue Southeast. ! 1 t I^ 3 . EXHIBITS: Map 4 . RECOMMENDED BY Public Wprka Director (Committee, Staff, F.�qminer, Commission, , trrc. ) 5 . VNBVDGETED FISCAL/PER82NM IMPACT: NO, , � � YES �T 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ ' SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7 i ^ 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmemh1r _seconds, i r ^ DISCUSSION: ACTION: f f (Council Agenda Item No. 6D �,-ter✓;�L � � I fir, r ,q rn,�.;�-- ,;.., , --- SE 240TW ST 1 SE 2 ' i h � ��� I 4-13THa-Sff �- .riir�,r /ii�;%r//ir/v//;/i///., •�, Ul KENT CITY LIMITS r , u41i SE 44T�'I ST CCLARK 4 = PRO'JECT'� SE 48TH ST LOCATI�ONLLI N NlLd SE 1256TH� ST y V)i > S 5 H ST v i r q3 TH� STTCLVL \T nLd a o ; �\ SR 516 - 27 TH t- S ` � WAY N 3 �KENTI CITY LIMITS U y COUNTRY CLUB VILLAGE DIVISION 2 O a O_ C7 KSx City,' Council Meetir3 ba��+t ., ,' ebr tary 19, 200 sent CaleE" 1 . SU33JE COUNCILMF{ML 13R ABSWCE, YINGLINO - r1 PIROVE pI 3 1 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: 'Approval of an excu*d.;absence from the February 19, 2002 , CityiCouncil meeting ' up'c3ilmember Rico Yingling. He will be ii, iable to attend. 3 . EXHIBITS: Memo '3 ; C o 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: (Committee, Staff, miner, Commission,' ID to. ) , 5 . UNBUDQETED FISCAL/PER,SftNEL IMPACT: NO .Po YES 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ i SOURCE OF FU=S: i 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: ) , ( Councilmember 'moves, Couneilma � � seconde� DISCUSSION: ACTION: � 4 ; Council Agenda ' Item No. 6E 4 , A MEMORANDUM TO: JIM WHITE, MAYOR CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: RICO YINGLING, COUNCIL MEMBER DATE: FEBRUARY 19, 2002 SUBJECT: CITY COUNCIL EXCUSED ABSENCE I would like to request an excused absence from the February 19, 2002 City Council meeting. I will be unable to attend. Thank you for your consideration RY:jb �ft s r r : E "ruary 19, 2 Mftnsent CalendAr 1 . SUBJECT: SURPLUS HOS� - AUT�RTZE yy f .I I ( 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Approval for the IFI t `F tment to surplus 110 sections cf=13 5 in hose andj � . for the Fire Department to advertise' and sell th t*tkighest bidder. In the past our standa# supply for hose 34.,*�i" .nch. We are currently in the prooebO of changing our ,Atintory to carry 4" hose as our standard supply. ' As a result of the chamoe, there are apprp iwo 110 sections, of 3 .5 inch hose which- a of no value to, t. ,l ttment. The ." estimated value of the }nose is $1, 000 . 3 . EXHIBITS: None 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Fire 'n. and Public 9 6 ' v "I flee (3-0) f (Committee, Staff, gxomiaer, Commissio 1 Y q I 5. UNBUDC#ETED FISCAL/PEN!�!RNL IMPACT: YES�� y, 6. EXPVMITURE. REQUIRED: $; 30URCE OF FUNDS : 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: I ` Councilmember��t[:oves, Councilme ' seconds ,I 'r � aa I ' DISCUSSION: i, ACTION: ' ^I i Vouncil Agenda �tFtem No. 6F 44.' d9 k St +, a ncil meet jg 20 trvj 4. 4 1. SUBJECT: SURPLUS FIB ENGINE/AID UNITE IZE , : I 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: '�Pku.thoriZ tion for;` ' s,' i"istration to surplus two (2) 19$�;+Pierce Engine/Aidin �ry 1{ pparatus 77 VIN#040115 and apparat 713, VIN#040121 C:, � V,, Fire Administration to adv'erkise the apparatus:` kfi", to the highest bidder. Two 1986 Pierce enginef► id units have sxqo expected, performance. Apparatus 713 has over 132i,q 'i ' on its odometer and Apparatus ,712 'has over 156, map , on its odometer. In addition, :Apparatus 712 had ' , engine and pump rebuilt within thOa,,last ten (10) yeo These engine/aid units are currently ut$t3 ;�� reserve ' status. We currently, ilAve ,adequate rase that will i be maintained to meet UtLe departments fp . o needs. Surplusing these two (21' engine/aid unit4�i- ' XjZ ,, ist in ' maintaining a fleet of ,: eserve engines tltl beyond our needs and riot requirip4 ,additional resouW,0# are drained from the department in !the form of staff`, maintenance i ° costs. We are estimating that we could possibly,,ri �ids in 'the amount of $20, 000 each. " 3 . EXHIBITS: None 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Fire C 'ef and Public Sa ttee (3-0) ' (Committee, Staff, U*miner, Commisaiq y S. UNBU'DGETED FISCAL/PERSRMM IMPACT: NC'' = YES p It 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ � SOURCE OF FUNDS: , r 7 . CITY COUMCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmerab � ,; secondk� DISCUSSION: ' p ACTION: u tem No. 6G i r 14, ivi 13' A i 1 ruary 19, 20 4 3y. neent Cale7it� 'r d" & a � 1 . SU$JECTa S. 212TH S"MET "MACEM$NT q*J� � ,, CRPT AS COMPLETE ,3 2 . SUY STATEMENT: ° r recommended by � Lic Works Director, accept as cosolete the S. 212thi p, replacement Well project and relea of retainage to�, !#kl ling, Inc. upon standard releases; from the state and � 'at any liens: The original contract! ount was $96,221 � �_�.'� final contract amount is $88y�54 . 39. l: j� , �' _, 3. E]ErISITS: None 4 . RECOMMENAED SY s Publ i ks Director �F , o r (Committee, Staff, miner, Commissio#0 5 . VNBTF!][ 7 FISCAL/P Y, IMBT YES��, ' 6. ERPMDITM33 REQUIRED: �$ _ SOURCE OF FM MS: 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: ! Councilmember� moves, Counci1merpbfrt Beconl q ? ' DISCUSSION: ACTION: zi _ i a' "M Council Agenda' stem No. 6$ 24 Sic ". one M i1 eet " f 1 ; ary z9, 2b 2 f Ca' nsent Caleh e- 1. SUBJEC"Ts WIESNER DRWA16E IMPROVEMENTS, *90 AS COMPLETE, a 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT. As recommended by`„* o j'� ' 0 Works i Director, accept as cpwe' to the Wiesner , Improvements project and release of, ketainage to Pivet} r ' t s Construction, Inc. upon, standard releases . state and release of any liens. the original contr ,; 00 1 t was $117, 415 . 87. The final ;tontract amount is i & .91. } ti 3 . EXHIBITS: None 4 . RTC ENRED BY: Public 10orks Director (Committee, Staff, Ex*m ner, Commission,%; ' , � t 5. UNBUDGETSED FISCAL/PERSg"& INPACT: NC0�'I P ,� ''°r °'V YES 'tl 6. EXPITURE' REQVIRED: K - SOURCE OF FUNDS .- A° 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Cousicilme i �' - seconds DISCUSSION: ` ACTION: Council Agenda .d I 1; J'fCtem No. 6I t ,' Cil Meejo,", din az Y, , lit went Cal en ' r Vr 1. 8 JECT: KING COUNTY' '-, 2001 CIMPREHEM781 -WASTE MANAGEMENT, PI1AN - RESOfUTipN • ,: 2 . SU4 RY STATEIMENT: ; doption of Refool , f ` relating to the KinglCunty 2001 Compreh �id Waste Management Plan. The eplution would a' aunty' s Plan to manage the solid waste system's garbago ycling services over the nextrtwetnty (20) yearal'i ensure adequate services and 64vironmegta,l colt Lng County transfer and disposal foilities. This will be deemed adopted if it hap been approvedp I*d. � representing at least 75% of the Cqy ty' s population �� . � days of December 1, 2001. '. '�, ' " , 3 . EXHIB=S: Resolution !*nd exhibit refar IId< 4 . RECmSwi =3D SY: Staff (Committee, Staff, Em�rJer, Commissib � © 5 . UNSUDGNTED FI$C1iL/FBRE YES :r FPi p 'e I; 6 . EXPENIIITUEQVIRED s N �� Is OF Ai7NDS: — � ' ��� 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: It 'r� 'It$ w Councilmembermgves, Councilors* seconds Al DISCUSSION; ' �K ACTION: ouncil Agenda �+ `�� ` {gtem No. 6J COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Mike H Martin, Chief Administrative Officer PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Don E Wickstrom, P E Public Works Director -856-5500 KEN i Phone Fax 253-856-6500 W 15MIx GTOM Address 220 Fourth Avenue S Kent,WA 98032-5895 Date February 4, 2002 To Public Works Com tttee From Don Wtckstrom, ubhc Works Director Subject Final 2001 Ding County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan Attached you will find the Executive Summary of the Final 2001 King County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan (A complete manual on the Comp Plan has been placed in the Council office for your review.) The Plan was endorsed by the Regional Policy Committee on October 25, 2001. Mark Buscher, Lead Planner with Icing County Solid Waste Division will give a brief overview of the Plan and answer any questions you may have MOTION Recommend Council authorization to adopt the Final 2001 King County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan. KCCompPlan RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, adopting the Final 2001 King County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan WHEREAS, the Washington State Solid Waste Management — Reduction and Recycling Act, Chapter 70 95 RCW, requires all cities and counties to prepare a coordinated comprehensive solid waste management plan, and WHEREAS, the public health and safety of the residents of King County and the City of Kent require safe and efficient handling and disposal of solid waste, and WHEREAS, the Final 2001 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan ("Plan") is the result ofjomt accomplishments of the cities, elected officials, solid waste coordinators, and King County which have depended on the citizens, businesses and recycling and solid waste management industries Representatives of all these groups and the King County Solid Waster Advisory Committee (SWAC), the Regional Policy Committee and the Utilities and Technology Committee contributed to this plan through workshops, meetings, working groups, and monthly SWAC meetings, and WHEREAS, the Plan presents King County's strategy for managing the solid waste system's garbage and recycling services over the next 20 years, and to ensure adequate services and environmental controls at King County transfer and disposal facilities This plan in based on a 20-year forecast of the waste stream and is 1 Final 2001 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan reviewed and updated every three (3) years to identify changed conditions and new needs, and WHEREAS, the Plan is deemed adopted if cities representing 75% of the incorporated population approve it within a 120-day adoption period which begins when the Plan is issued, in this case December 1, 2001, and is further subject to final approval by the Department of Ecology; and WHEREAS, the Plan was endorsed by the Regional Policy Committee on October 25, 2001, and WHEREAS, the City has reviewed the Final 2001 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan as set forth in the plan summary attached hereto as Exhibit A and agrees with the same, NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS . SECTION 1. Adoptzon. The final 2001 King County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan as endorsed by the Regional Policy Committee, and as set forth in the plan summary attached hereto as Exhibit A to this Resolution, is hereby adopted. SECTION 2. Severabzkty If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase of this resolution is declared unconstitutional or invalid for any reason, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this resolution SECTION 3. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date of this resolution is hereby ratified and affirmed. 2 Final 2001 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan SECTION 4. AUective Date This resolution shall take effect and be in force immediately upon its passage PASSED at a regular open public meeting by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington,this day of 2002 CONCURRED in by the Mayor of the City of Kent this day of 12002 JIM WHITE, MAYOR ATTEST BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM TOM BRUBAKER, INTERIM CITY ATTORNEY I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of Resolution No. passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, the day of 2002 BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK P\CrvJVtaolunonlSolidW=cMu gc=mPla doe 3 Final2001 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan R�?�-�`f�� �'.:< '�r:�k �.� •*y [ r �E � '..'tom.. 51 L ?� �� T \yrll. _ Chapter 1 • Plan Summary a ;t r� di`�t f Plan Summary The Final 2001 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan presents King County s strategy for managing the solid waste system's garbage and recycling ser- vices over the next 20 years It will guide us through a time of many significant changes— including closure of the last active landfill in King Countv The area that this Plan covers includes all of King County's incorporated and unin- corporated areas except for the City of Seattle which has its own solid waste system, and Milton, which is part of Pierce County's system In mapping out a plan for the solid waste system, several fundamental objectives emerged •Keep pace with the region's population and economic growth • Continue to provide the vital services that residents have come to expect •Monitor industry changes and advances to keep the system as efficient and effective as possible •Continue to be a steward of the environment and a leader in resource conservation •Control system costs and continue to keep disposal rates stable and low These fundamental objectives underlie the planning for each facet of the regional solid waste system— from promotion of waste reduction and recycling to transfer sta- tion improvements to planning for long-term disposal The common theme running through the Plan is to build upon the system's existing infrastructure and past successes to shape our future 1-2 King County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan•2001 Chapter 1 • Plan Summary This final 2001 Plan is the cnlrmnation of a system-wide planning effort The rec- ommendations presented throughout its pages were developed with input from local gmernment leaders, private industry representatives, and King County citizens The County will continue to work closely with these planning participants as the recom- mendations in this Plan are implemented and the region's future unfolds Guide to the Plan The purpose of a Comprehensne Solid Waste Management Plan is to provide the overarching goals and policies that will guide solid %Haste and recycling programs and services in the system While it presents a framework for the future, it is not intended to be a work plan for specific c policies,rates, programs, or capital improvements Imple- mentation of specific recommendations will be accom- plished through the County and cities' annual work plan t= _ processes ., ¢' '_ • This 2001 Plan is organized to guide the reader through the planning process from demographic forecasting to the ^^ assessment of garbage disposal fees Chapter 2 sets the stage for the reader by providing a brief look at the history of solid ti aste management in the county, the process for developing the Plan and the goNernmg policies for the solid waste management system Chapter 3 looks at pro- - jetted population and employment growth and how that The Plan presents growth and other factors are used to develop waste generation, recycling and disposal recommendations for forecasts Chapters 4 through 10 discuss the various facets of the solid waste system, all facets of the regional including solid waste system • Chapter 4 —Waste Reduction, Recycling, and Market Development • Chapter 5 — Collection of Recvclables and Mixed Municipal Solid Waste (MMSW or Garbage) • Chapter 6—The Regional Transfer System • Chapter 7 —Disposal of MMSW • Chapter 8— Construction,Demolition, and Landcleanng Debris (CDL), and Special Wastes • Chapter 9—Enforcement • Chapter 10— Solid Waste System Financing and Rates These chapters present the background,governing policies and current issues asso- ciated with each element of the system, followed by recommendations for the 20-year planning period The recommendations might propose specific actions, suggest a con- tinuation of current practice, or identify the need for further dialogue or additional studies For ease of locating recommendations within each chtipter, they Q are noted with the symbol to the right A brief summary of the key recom- mendations from each chapter is presented below King County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management plan•2001 1-3 Chapter 1 • Plan Summary Chapter 4— Waste Reduction, Recycling, and Market Development With the increases in population and employment projected for King County in the upcoming years, it is critical to continue our focus on waste reduction and recycling as the highest priorities for managing solid waste The recommendations in Chapter 4 build on existing haste reduction and recycling programs by expanding educational and technical assistance in our communities, businesses, and schools, and developing strong partnerships with cities and public agencies to coordinate our mutual efforts in this area The Plan describes measurable goals and targets for our Nraste reduction and recy- cling efforts It also reaffirms the policy that waste reduction and recycling programs must be cost effective as well as aggressive One element of the Plan's recommendation is to expand recycling and reuse oppor- tunities at the County's transfer stations and pursue other venues for collection,such as special community events In addition, more commodities are being looked at for their recycling potential in the marketplace, such as certain plastics, textiles, construction debris food wastes, and others Regional markets and technologies are routinely stud- ied to assess the market potential for an array of recycled and reused products The County lull continue to work with the cities, regional agencies and organizations, and area residents, businesses, and manufacturers to pursue sustainable markets to support our waste reduction and recycling goals Some of the newer programs slated for more attention include increased recycling . and reuse of organic materials, such as yard wastes and agricultural wastes, product stewardship among consumers businesses,and manufacturers,and promotion of"green" or sustainable building principles throughout our communities Chapter 5 — Collection of Recyclables and Mixed Municipal Solid Waste Nearly all of the residents in King County subscribe to curbside collection services for garbage and recyclables One recommendation in Chapter 5 is to research the costs and benefits of combining curbside recyclables (except for glass) into a single bin for collection and adding new materials for pick-up,such as polycoated papers,juice boxes and sinular containers, textiles, and more plastics These changes were recently made by the City of Seattle's solid waste system Other recommendations in the chapter focus on providing collection opportunities that reduce the need for customers to bring wastes to the transfer stations in their own vehicles,thereby reducing traffic and congestion at the stations One reason customers typically give for bringing material to the transfer stations is that they have bulky or extra items that could not be put out at the curb, such as debris from a household clean- ing or remodeling project To develop alternative ways for residents to dispose of bulky and extra items, the County will work with the cities to coordinate more special collection events and with the private collection companies to examine the feasibility of establishing efficient and econormcal pick-up services 1-4 King County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan•2001 Chapter 1 •Plan Summary The County will also be studying the possibility of establishing a stationary collec- tion site for household hazardous waste at a transfer station This service would aug- ment collection provided by the County's Wastemobile, which travels throughout the county to collect these types of wastes Chapter 6 — The Regional Transfer System The current transfer system is a mix of public and pnvate facilities, and the Plan recommends that this balance remain the same in the future The pnvate solid waste handling companies presented several alternatives to increase their role in providing transfer services After a thorough analysis of the alternam es no benefit to the ratepayers of King County was identified from further privatization of part or all of the public transfer system The County s 1992 Plan called for a major construction program to build a number of new and replacement transfer stations The 2001 Plan makes the best use of existing facilities and optimizes capital outlay by concentrating investment at"expandable" sta- tions and making repairs and safety and operational improvements at the remaining stations, where there Is limited space for expansion This Plan does recognize that some of the transfer stations are operating very close to capacity, and some new facili- ties may be necessary pnmanly in the northeast part of the county When the Cedar Hills Regional Landfill closes in about 2012 the County will make the transition to waste export To prepare the regional transfer system for export waste compactors will be installed at County transfer stations Studies of similar utilities that have made the transition to waste export show that consolidating garbage into com- pacted loads makes transport considerably more economical Other upgrades will be made at the transfer stations to improve traffic flow and queuing and to complete necessary maintenance and repairs at some of the older stations The County will also be pur- suing ways to manage traffic patterns and traffic flow at the transfer stations to better serve the customers Chapter 7 — Disposal of MMSW The County's aggressive waste reduction and recycling efforts in the past have led to a substantial reduction in the amount of garbage that reaches the landfill In fact, one outcome of these efforts has been to extend the life of the Cedar Hills Regional Landfill by about 8 years Even so, the landfill is expected to reach its permitted capacity and IN close in 2012 The Plan recommends that the County fol- AL low the path of other local lunsdictions and begin to export wastes to a landfill outside The County opened of King County once Cedar Hills closes Refuse Area 5 Dotal Adoption of this Plan is only the first step in prepanng for waste export There will Hills Lan dlrl7in CedarliRegional be extensive public and city involvement in the planning process before export begins 1994 Together, we will develop a new system for disposing of the region's waste by 2012 King County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan•2001 1-5 Chapter 1 • Plan Summary One alternative exarmned in some detail in the draft and final Plans was whether to begin exporting waste before Cedar Hills is full, in order to extend the life of the land- fill This idea did not prove to be a cost-effective alternative There are compelling operational and economic reasons to continue sending all of King County's waste to the landfill until it reaches its permitted capacity and then closing the facility However, the County will remain open to considering proposals for initiating waste export prior to the 2012 closure of Cedar Hills should circumstances warrant A transition plan will also be needed as the closure date approaches Chapter 8 — Construction, Demolition, and Landclearing Debris (CDL) Private-sector solid waste management companies currently handle the system s CDL waste and recycling under contract with King County King County facilities accept only linuted quantities of CDL Contracts with the private companies expire in 2004 Before this date, targeted studies will be conducted to determine how to best handle CDL in the future The primary goal of any selected plan will be to increase the amount of CDL that is recycled from both commercial work sites and disposal sites Chapter 9 — Enforcement The key recommendation in Chapter 9 is to continue to coordinate system-aide efforts to control litter and illegal dumping The County and other jurisdictions at the state and local level have established a cooperative effort to tackle the problem Rec- ommendations in the Plan include continuing with existing programs and task forces, increasmg targeted education programs establishing an illegal dumping hotline and possibly pursuing legislative remedies to strengthen enforcement Chapter 10 — Solid Waste System & Financing and Rates All of the program and service recommendations for the regional transfer and disposal system are designed to strike a balance between system improvements and cost _ There are two primary recommendations in this chapter of the Plan First,the County plans to provide more tech- - 1 nical assistance to the cities Grants provide critical fund- ing to city programs for waste reduction and recycling,and the County will assist cities in locating and taking advan- tage of grant opportunities The County will also serve as a clearinghouse of information about programs, contracts, and ideas that can be shared among the cities Also recommended is the formation of a Solid Waste Policy Work Group The work group is intended to share responsibility for Curbside recycling is analyzing and developing solid waste policies and rate structures Proposals developed available to nearly all by the group will go to the King County Executive for consideration in future rate of the County's design residents 0 1-6 King County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan•2001 Chapter 'I • Plan Summary Recommendations formulated in the Plan were developed through extensive re- search and analyses Each chapter cites vanous supporting documents, studies, and technical papers that are provided in the 2000 Comprehensive Sohd lVaste Manage- ment Plan Technical Appendices These appendices are bound in two volumes under separate cover A glossary of important terns and abbreviations is presented following the Plan chapters The final attachment to this Plan is the Responsiveness Summaries, which present the County-s response to public comments received on the draft Plan Issued in April 2000 The summaries provide a guide on how the Plan incorporates comments from the individuals and groups that participated in developing the Plan The Regional Planning Effort Issuance of this Plan follows a comprehensive planning effort involving all of the key players in the solid waste system This effort be.-an in the spnng of 1999 as the County Solid Waste Division asked for suggestions and ideas about the future direc- tion of solid waste programs and services The Division met individually with - •Elected officials and solid w aste coordinators from the 37 cities that are part of the regional system • Representatives from the private solid waste management companies • The unincorporated area councils • The Solid Waste Advisory Committee • The Regional Policy Committee • The Utilities and Technology Committee To be sure that private citizens were heard, the County hosted six public meetings across the county These meetings were attended by some 250 people who contributed their ideas and expectations about services in the region as well as m their own com- munities From the diverse ideas gathered during this process, the Division prepared the draft Plan which was issued in April 2000 The draft Plan laid out vanous alternatives and proposed recommendations for regional services and programs The public comment period for the draft Plan extended from May through Septem- ber 2000 During this period, Division staff again met with all of the key players to introduce the major components of the Plan and the process for providing comments Meetings were held with the cities both individually and jointly to discuss the Plan contents and process for revision and adoption Five more public meetings were held around the County , The final Plan was developed after careful consideration of all the comments received in response to the draft Plan Those comments are included with the Respon- siveness Summaries bound in this document The two Responsiveness Summaries show how and where the Executive's 2000 Plan address d the public and city comments and how they were addressed in this final 2001 Plan adopted by the King County Council King County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan•2001 1-7 Chapter 1 • Plan Summary Process for Adopting and Amending a Final Plan The final Plan must be adopted by the cities and the King County Council and ap- proved by the Washington Department of Ecology before implementation The process for development and adoption of the Plan 1s described in Figure 1-1 Figure i-i. Process for Development,Review,and Adoption of the Plan Draft Plan Development May-Oct 1999 Meetings with the public,cities,solid waste industry, and other groups Oct 1999-April 2000 Preparation and Issuance of the draft Plan Dec 19go-Aug 2000 Preparation and Issuance of the draft Environmental Impact Statement(EIS) Draft Plan Review and Response to Comments April-Sept 2000 Public review and comment period for draft Plan and for the draft EIS (Aug Sept) Work with Plan participants Briefings for the King County Council's Utilities& Technology Committee and Regional Policy Committee on the draft Plan Draft Plan and Draft EIS Revision Oct z000-Feb 2001 Additional analysis and revision of draft Plan and EIS based on review of public comments Consideration of Final Plan and EIS by King County Council March 2001 King County Executive releases final 2000 Plan and EIS March-Oct 2001 Utilities&Technology and Regional Policy Committee Review of Plan recommendations Adoption of Final Plan Oct 15,2001 Adoption of the Final 2001 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan by the King County Council Oct 25,2001 The Regional Policy Committee,acting as Solid Waste Interlocal Forum,recommends that the cities approve the Plan Dec 1,2ool-March 31,2002 The 12o-day period for city adoption begins April 1,2002 Ecology's 45-day approval period for adopted Plan begins 1-$ King County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-2001 The ILAS require that adopted solid waste management plans be rep mewed, dnd any necessary revisions proposed, at least once every three years, or more frequently if warranted Elements to be updated will be assessed to accommodate new needs and opportunities and to make corrections necessary to achieve adopted goals and imple- ment adopted policies An amendment process was developed and agreed upon by the cities and the County in 1990 If issues requiring a plan amendment are identified and resolved between the County and the affected city or cities the parties develop the plan amendment, take formal action to adopt it and then implement it If an issue arises and agreement cannot be reached between the affected lunsdic- tions a formal request is made by the County or affected city(ies) to the Regional Pohcy Committee (replacing the former Solid Waste Interlocal Forum) to consider a plan amendment If the Regional Policy Committee determines that a plan amendment is necessary, the committee determines which cities are affected b) the issue and re- views and approves the proposed plan amendment Once approved the Counh and all other affected cities would act to adopt the amendment Ecology would then approve the amendment and it would be distributed to all cities that are coffered by the Plan King County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan•2001 1-9 _ { � i• is li `JAI , }� r xen VV i `„ ouncil MeeGsn� uar 19, 2f70 at J t sent Calen ai- yyyy ` Y 1. SUBJECT: TACOMA SECOND SUPPLY PROJECT C� 1 REPRESENTATION - AUTHORIZE � 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by t4 ,POlic Works Committee, approve the public Works Directo 'a0the official representative to the Tacoma Second Supply,Project Committee and also, authorize the�Vater Superintended 4' '';the alternate representative. 3 . EXHIBITS: Public WorkB Director Memorandq;.1 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public 'Works Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, COmmissiOM, ' tG: � S . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSG](1N'EL IMPACT: NO I YES r { r r 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: SOURCE OF FUNDS• -0f jI 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Ir F Councilmember i -moves, Councilmemb4 seconds 1, i DISCUSSION: I ; + ACTION: i ' Council Agenda Item No. 6K COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Mike H Martin, Chief Administrative Officer PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Don E Wickstrom, RE Public Works Director „L N T Phone Fax 253-856-6500 W..SNINOT.N Address 220 Fourth Avenue S Kent,WA 98032-5895 Date : February 4 , 2002 To : Public Works Committee From: Don Wickstrom; Public Works Director Subject : Tacoma Second Supply Project Committee Representation In the agreement that Council authorized to sign relating to the Tacoma Second Supply Project, it established a project committee . Further, each partner of the agreement must formally authorize its representative. In general, the purpose of the committee is to provide over site review and control on the management of the construction project and then the operation of the system upon its completion MOTION: Recommend authorizing the Public Works Director as the official representative to the Tacoma Second Supply Project Committee and that the Water Superintendent be appointed as the alternate representative. SsPrepresentative j�A' f( 7uncil Meetiio� " ' "ruary 19, 200 C sent Calen 1 . SUBJECT. 2002 STREET"SWEEPIN-1 CONTRACT '4 *E T(*IZE 2 . SUMMIARY STATEMENT: :As recommended by ,to r Pbb4c works Committee, authorizati©n for the Mayor to ,# ;1t1� 2002 Street ` Sweeping Contract Agreement with McDonoug „ �:S0nM, for the amount of $12 , 170 . 00 per month, upon concuTolpf the language therein by th¢; C�ty Attorney and t o, Ot4ic works Director. The existirq;,contract will enm _ ;,�-, 2002 . ,yK 3 . ESHIB T s Public Works Director Memorip4ah 1J2002 Street Sweeping Service Contract � 4 4 . RECO ED SY: Publi ;Wor},s Committee '^ ('Committee, Staff, BxAmir)er, Comnissiq j 0r;; 5 . UNBUDGBTED FISCAL/P 11PAQT: NO, r �'� = YES 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: SOURCE OF BUMS: VA 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember _ mes, Councilme Mb,0 ', seconda, DISCUSSION: 41 ACTION: :Council Agenda tem No. 6L g ; COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Mike H Martin, Chief Administrative Officer PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Don E Wickstrom, P.E Public Works Director - KENT Phone 253856-6500 WA5NINGTON Address 220 Fourth Avenue S Kent, WA 98032-5895 Date February 4, 2002 To Public Works Committee From Don Wickstrom;Ppublic Works Director Subject 2002 Street Sweeping Contract On November 30, 2001 the City advertised for Requests for Proposals for the 2002 Street Sweeping project This contract provides sweeping of selected streets throughout the city • Listed below are the five bid proposals submitted Order of Finish after Interview Evaluation • McDonough& Sons 12,170 • Action Services Corp 12,849 • Best Parking Lot Cleaning 12,749 • Econo-Vac 13,460 • Sea-Tac Sweeping 39,855 An Evaluation Committee reviewed the proposals and a short list of three was created for further consideration Each of the three finalists were interviewed, were asked a series of identical questions and scored from 1 to 5 for each answered question Selection was based on cost as well as the interview scores Negotiations were made with McDonough & Sons and the total monthly cost, excluding any applicable sales tax (lump sum) is $12,170.00 The monthly cost for the existing contractor is S14,400 00, tlus contract will end on February I' MOTION Recommend Council authorization for the Mayor to sign the 2002 Street Sweeping Contract Agreement with McDonough & Sons for the amount of$12,170.00, upon concurrence of the language therein by the City Attorney and Public Works Director streetsweepmgcontract STREET SWEEPING SERVICE CONTRACT 2002 THIS AGREEMENT is entered into between the CITY OF KENT, a Washington municipal corporation ("CITY") and McDonough & Sons. Inc., PO Box 461. Ravensdale. Washington 98051-0461. Phone: (425) 432-1054lFax: (425) 432-3155, Attention: Lonnie McDonough, a Washington Corporation ("CONTRACTOR") WITNESSETH. That in consideration of the terms and conditions contained herein and attached and made a part of this agreement, the parties covenant and agree as follows. I. TERM AND PAYMENT. 11 The contract for service shall be in effect for a term of ten (10) months and shall commence on March 1, 2002, and shall end on December 31, 2002 However, in the event the CONTRACTOR has fully performed all the terms, covenants and conditions of the contract to the CITY's satisfaction, and because the contract is not a PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT, and is a SERVICE CONTRACT, the CITY may, at its sole option, extend the terms of this contract for up to five additional one (1) year service contract extensions. The CITY's option to extend this contract shall be delivered by written notice to the ofCONTRACTOR not less than sixty (60) days prior the expiration of each contract term 12 The CITY reserves the right to cancel the contract on sixty(60) days written notice to CONTRACTOR 1 3 CONTRACTOR shall be paid monthly in the lump sum of Twelve Thousand One Hundred Seventy Dollars (S12.170), excluding any extra sweeping as specified on the REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) Form Item 4, inclusive of all applicable sales tax, for each month of services rendered This amount reflects full payment for complete sweeping of the streets listed on Exhibit D according to the schedule stated in that Exhibit and in compliance with all terms and conditions of this agreement 14 If the CITY increases the total linear curb footage beyond that originally set forth in this agreement, the CITY shall pay CONTRACTOR for the additional footage as follows (a) Establish the street sweeping frequency schedule for the added street(s), (b) Determine the total additional footage per sweeping schedule for the added street(s); (c) Determine the CONTRACTOR's contract price per foot for each affected street schedule from the costs, linear curb footage and schedules established in this agreement, (d) Multiply the total additional footage per sweeping schedule by the contract price per foot for that schedule If the total additional linear curt, footage added during the first three years of this agreement exceeds twenty-five percent (25%) of the total linear curb footage originally contracted for in this agreement, either party may re-open negotiations for the specific, limited purpose of adjusting the price for these additional services STREET SWEEPING CONTRACT 2002 011?8102 Saved as McDonough& Sons—2002 Sweeping 1 1 5 In the event streets are missed during the sweeping cycle defined in this contract, the CITY may, at its sole option, elect to require the CONTRACTOR to sweep the missed streets as provided for in Section 3.9 4 of this contract, OR may elect to reduce the payment owed to the CONTRACTOR If the CITY elects to reduce the payment owed to the CONTRACTOR, the reduction shall be calculated as follows (a) Determine the CONTRACTOR'S contract price per linear curb foot swept from the costs, linear curb footage and schedules established in this agreement. (See Section 1 4(c)) (b) Multiply the contract price per linear curb foot swept by the total number of linear curb feet that the CONTRACTOR failed to sweep in a given month (c) Reduce the next monthly payment due to the CONTRACTOR by the total reduction calculated in 1 5(b) 1 6 Payment for services rendered during each month will be paid as soon as possible under the CITY's standard schedule for processing purchase orders, provided the CONTRACTOR has met the conditions of this agreement and that proper invoices have been received by the CITY by the second business day of each month The estimated time for payment shall be thirty (30) calendar days from the date of proper receipt of CONTRACTORS invoices Payment will be based on the established street mileage herein set forth for the actual amount of service ordered Normal services performed in excess of those ordered by the Director of Public Works or his/her designee will not be included for payment 17 In the event the Director of Public Works or his designee orders special sweeping service other than the services covered by these specifications, the CONTRACTOR will be paid on an hourly basis for the time required at the rate of Fiftv Dollars (S50) per hour Requests for payment for special sweeping services must show name of person requesting special sweeping, date and time of request, date and time completed and location of work 1 8 The CONTRACTOR shall submit weekly color maps as described in section 4 7 of the (RFP) Requirements and Qualifications. All cost for the production of said maps, including, but not limited to, time, material, hardware, software, and transferring electronic files, if requested by the City, shall be considered incidental II. DEFINITIONS. 2.1 Whenever in the contract, the specifications and other contract documents the following words, and terms of pronouns in place of them, are used, the meaning will be construed as follows. 21 1 ALLEY -The entire width between the boundary lines of right of way, publicly maintained. 2 1.2 AUXILIARY LANE - The portion of the street adjoining the traveled way for parking, speed change, turning, storage for turning, weaving, truck climbing or for other purposes supplementary to through traffic movement, 2 1 3 CITY -The City of Kent, a Washington municipal corporation, whose mailing address is 220 Fourth Avenue South, Kent, Washington 98032 STREET SWEEPING CONTRACT 2002 01128102 Saved as McDonough&Sons—2002 Sweeping 2 2 1.4 CONTRACTOR- The individual, firm,joint venture, copartnership or corporation, and its heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns, or the lawful agent of any such individual, firm, partnership, covenantor or corporation, or its surety under the contract bond, constituting one of the principles to the contract and undertaking to perform the work herein specified Where any pronoun is used as referring to the word "CONTRACTOR" it shall mean the Contract as defined above. 2 15 CURB - A vertical or sloping member generally along and defining the edge of street 2 16 INTERSECTION - The area embraced within the prolongation or connection of the lateral curb lines, or if none, then the lateral boundary lines of two streets which join one another at, or approximately at, right angles, or the area within which vehicles traveling upon different streets loimng at any other angle may come in conflict. The junction of an alley with a street is included 2 1 7 PREMIUM SERVICE - At the discretion of the Superintendent or his designee, the Contractor shall, within 24 hours of notice, proceed to sweep at least once per day in areas designated by the Superintendent or Ills designee This PREMIUM SERVICE will continue for Ninety (90) days unless extended or suspended by the Superintendent or his designee, primarily occurring during the months of October through December The option to use, extend or suspend PREMIUM SERVICE shall be at the sole discretion of the Superintendent or his designee 2 1.8 PREMIUM SERVICE AREA- Areas designated by the Superintendent or his designee, to be swept at least once per day for a period up to ninety days Roads can be added or deleted at the discretion of the Superintendent or his designee 2 19 STREET - Referred to as in this contract shall be defined as the entire surface from curb to curb including island, traffic curbs, intersection areas, auxiliary lanes and those paved areas between curbs that exist where alleys intersect streets 2 1 10 SWEEPING MATERIAL - The material, debris, or waste that is swept from the street or travel way 2 1 11 WORK - Work shall mean the furmshing of all labor, materials, equipment, and other incidentals necessary or convenient to the successful completion of the service and carrying out all of the duties and obligations imposed by the contract III. SCOPE OF SERVICES. 3 1 The CONTRACTOR shall do all work and furnish all tools, materials, and equipment for street sweeping in accordance with and as described in this contract, including all attached exhibits and forms The CONTRACTOR shall be responsible to obtain and pay for any permits or licenses required by the CITY or any other local, state or federal governmental authority that are necessary to perform the contract STREET SWEEPING CONTRACT 2002 01128102 Sa%ed as McDonough&: Sons—2002 Sweeping 3 3 2 CONTRACTOR is and shall be at all times acting as an independent contractor and not as an employee of the CITY. The CONTRACTOR shall secure at its expense, and shall be responsible for all payments of income tax, social security, state disability insurance compensation, unemployment compensation, and all other payroll deductions for the CONTRACTOR, officers, agents, employees and sub- contractors. The CONTRACTOR shall also secure all applicable business licenses, if required, in connection with the contract services, including all required licenses for CONTRACTOR's officers, agents, employees and sub-contractors 3 3 CONTRACTOR shall comply with the following employee requirements 3 3 1 All workers shall be COMPETENT and SKILLED in the performance of the work to which they maybe assigned Failure or delay in the performance of this contract due to the CONTRACTOR's mability to obtain workers of the NUMBER and SKILL required shall constitute a material breach of this contract PAYMENT OF PREVAILING WAGES IS REQUIRED FOR THIS SERVICE CONTRACT pursuant to RCW 39.04 010 3 3 2 CONTRACTOR shall require that all operators of its street sweeping equipment maintain current, valid appropriate Washington State Driver's Licenses and any other pertinent requirements thereof, including commercial driver's licenses 3 3 3 The CONTRACTOR shall require all employees to be courteous at all times, to abstain from the use of loud or profane language and to perform their work as quietly as possible All employee shall be neat in appearance. The CITY reserves its absolute right to determine whether CONTRACTOR is in compliance with this subsection 3.3.4 If the CONTRACTOR's officers are not available, pick-up orders maybe given by the Director of Public Works or his/her designee to the CONTRACTOR or his/her designee, who shall have immediate charge of operations and who shall provide the require performance 3 4 Sweeping vehicles shall be numbered and shall have the CONTRACTOR's name and vehicle number painted in letters of contrasting color at least four inches high on each side and on the back of each vehicle. No advertising shall be permitted other than the name of the CONTRACTOR All vehicles shall be kept in a clean and sanitary condition, and all sweeping vehicles shall be cleaned at least once a week Repainting of all vehicles shall be done as needed to maintain an acceptable appearance, or within thirty(30) days after the written notification by the Director of Public Works or his designee. 34 1 Street Sweepers required for performance shall be maintained in good working condition, equipped with proper warning lights, and operated and equipped in accordance with chapter 46 37 RCW as it applies to slow moving and/or maintenance vehicles. 3 4.2 Each of CONTRACTOR's sweepers dedicated to the performance of this contract work stated herein shall be equipped with a functioning Global Positioning System(GPS) mobile unit. The GPS mobile unit shall be capable of tracking the sweepers position, direction, speed, time and status (sweeping or not sweeping)when operating within the City limits in any weather. . CONTRACTOR shall maintain daily electronic files of the said GPS tracking information Further, the CONTRACTOR shall use the GPS electronic files to produce a plotted color map, STREET SIVEEPING CONTRACT 2002 01/128/02 Saud as McDonough& Sons—2002 Sweeping 4 on a weekly basis, reflecting the CONTRACTOR'S sweeping activities of the previous week The said map shall be produced in an electronic format. Hand drawn maps will not be accepted The plotted map shall be submitted with the CONTRACTOR'S weekly sweeping list described herein The CONTRACTOR shall retam, for the duration of this contract, copies of all electrorc data stated herein. The CONTRACTOR shall, upon request,provide the CITY with any electronic files or maps requested 3 5 The CONTRACTOR assumes the risk of all conditions foreseen or unforeseen and agrees to continue to perform the work described in this contract without additional compensation under its regular weekly schedule as provided to the CITY Specifically, additional debris on streets caused by excessive rainfall or caused by street sanding during or after snowfall shall not give rise to claim for additional compensation or allow substantial variance on the weekly schedule 3 6 Whenever directed to perform non-emergency Call-Out extra work, CONTRACTOR shall respond and commence that work within two hours of receiving that direction Minimum compensation time for that extra work shall be two (2) hours at the established extra sweeping Call-Out hourly rate established in CONTRACTOR'S proposal 3 7 In anv emergency, the CITY reserves its absolute right to hire any street sweeping service provider to perform any amount of work for any length of time at such rates as the CITY determines to be in the CITY's best interests during the time of that emergency However, the CITY will use its best efforts to utilize CONTRACTOR for these emergency services whenever practical The CONTRACTOR shall comply with the following route restrictions 3 8 1 SERVICE AREA A [CORE AREA] - Core Area streets (refer to schedule) are designated for NO PARKING, MONDAYS ONLY, from 4 a in to 7 a m for street sweeping purposes 3 8 2 SERVICE AREA B [RESIDENTIAL AREA] - No sweeping activities shall take place between 10pm and 7a.m 3 8 3 SERVICE AREA C [MAJOR ARTERIAL] -No restriction applicable 3 8 4 PREMIUM SERVICE AREA D [DESIGNATED ROADS TO BE SWEPT ONCE DAILY] - To be addressed at the time service is required 3 9 Streets shall be swept clean and no piles of debris shall be left anywhere within any street or nght-of- way 3 9 1 Intersections shall be swept clean and CONTRACTOR shall hand sweep areas skipped by the sweeping machines. 3 92 Water shall be used as required by the CITY to control dust 3 9 3 The CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for the cleaning of all debris spilled or tracked on any street, alley or public place by any of it's equipment If the CONTRACTOR falls to clean the same within 24 hours of being given notice by the Director of Public Works or his designee, the STREET Sir EEPLM1'G CONTRACT 2002 01/28/02 Saved as McDonough 3 Sons—2002 Sweeping Director of Public Works or his designee may cause such streets to be cleaned and charge the costs to the CONTRACTOR. The CITY is authorized to deduct such cost from any payments Is due to the CONTRACTOR 3 9 4 In the event streets are missed during the sweeping cycle defined in this contract, the CITY may, at its sole option, elect to reduce the next payment owed to the CONTRACTOR as provided for in Section 15 of this contract, OR may elect to require the CONTRACTOR to sweep said streets at no extra charge to the CITY The Director of Public Works or his/her designee shall contact the CONTRACTOR and provide him with a list of missed streets The CITY shall inform the CONTRACTOR whether it has elected to reduce payment as provided for in Section 15 of this contract, or to require the CONTRACTOR to sweep the missed streets If the CITY elects to require the CONTRACTOR to sweep the missed streets, the CONTRACTOR shall sweep missed streets within 48 hours of being notified, or the City's next payment due shall be reduced as calculated in Section 15 of this contract 3 10 During the term or terms of this contract, the CITY shall have the nght to make additions to, deductions f om, or other changes in the nature of the work CONTRACTOR shall not make any changes in the nature of the work without the prior written approval of the CITY establishing the nature of the change and compensation therefor IV. SPECIAL PROVISIONS. 4 1 The CONTRACTOR acknowledges that it has made its own examination, investigation, and research regarding the proper method of doing the work, all conditions affecting the work to be done, the labor, equipment and materials needed and the quantity of the work to be performed The CONTRACTOR is satisfied with its own investigation and research regarding all of these conditions and the Contractor's decision to enter into the proposed contract is based upon such investigation and research The CONTRACTOR further assumes full responsibility for any estimates, statements or interpretations made by any officer or agent of the CITY whether or not all or part of any of those estimates, statements or interpretations may prove to be in any respect erroneous 42 The CONTRACTOR shall not use a firm name containing the words "Kent", "City", or any words implying municipal ownership 4 3 It will be the CONTRACTOR'S responsibility to obtain and pay for any water used in the sweeping operation Contractor shall obtain an up-to-date Hydrant permit and a copy of this permit shall be tamed on sweepers at all times while working within the city limits of Kent Care must be taken in order to protect the water system from damage or contamination 44 Responsible management or supervisory persons shall be accessible at or through the office during regular business hours to assure the required contractual performance. CONTRACTOR shall maintain a telephone message system to receive messages when the office is closed 45 The parties agree that they will establish acceptable procedures for communication of necessary information. Each parry agrees to designate a key employee who will be the responsible contact persor for that party with respect to implementation of the contract and communication of information STREETSIVEEPlAGC01M iCT2002 01128102 Saved as McDonough S Sons—'_002 Sweeping 6 necessary for the performance of the contract. Each party agrees to follow the procedures established between the parties for regular, effective communication of information between the parties 46 CONTRACTOR agrees and covenants to keep at all tunes accurate and complete records and accounts in writing, mcludmg, but not limited to, route books indicating which streets were swept, as dictated by acceptable accounting practices in order to coordinate information with the GPS system attached to the CONTRACTOR's sweepers. The CONTRACTOR shall allow the CITY, or it's duly authorized representative or agent, reasonable and adequate access to all records, data, copies or duplicates without charge. The CONTRACTOR shall deliver to the CITY a written report and map every Monday(for the previous week) The City will not process a purchase order for payment if contractor does not timely and accurately provide these reports and maps In the event no such written report or map is received by the CITY, the CITY's record shall control in any dispute between CONTRACTOR and the CITY" and the CONTRACTOR waives and releases its right to prove or allege any facts or other data differing from the CITY's record. 7 Within seven days of the effective date of this agreement, the CONTRACTOR shall submit for the City's approval, a daily sweeping schedule, together with a planned route outline on maps furnished by the CITY CONTRACTOR shall designate which holidays it will observe and indicate all schedule modifications if the holiday falls on a regular sweeping day Should the CONTRACTOR need to modify the schedule as submitted, the CONTRACTOR shall give not less than seven (7) calendar days v�ntten notice to the Director of Public Works or his/her designee of any changes The CONTRACTOR shall protect all public and private utilities from damages by his/her operation If these utilities are damaged by reason of the CON—fRACTOR's operations, CONTRACTOR shall, at it's own expense, promptly repair or replace same to the original and/or better conditions In the event CONTRACTOR fails to promptly make the repairs, the Director of Public Works or his designee shall make the repair or replacement, and the cost of doing so shall be billed to CONTRACTOR or altematel�, at the CITY's option, the CITY may deduct that cost from any payments due the CONTRACTOR The CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for all consequences and shall defend, indemnify and hold the CITY harmless for any losses caused by the damaging or interruption of such Utilities services 49 CONTRACTOR recognizes that the sweeping material collected by its street sweepers either is or contains dangerous or hazardous wastes CONTRACTOR agrees to collect, handle, transport and dispose of the debris or material specifically in accordance with all applicable standards, rules and regulations now in effect or hereafter amended or enacted by the Washington Department of Ecology and the United States Environmental Protection Agency CONTRACTOR further assumes full responsibility and holds the CITY harmless for complete compliance with all other applicable local, state or federal laws, rules or regulations that apply to the services provided in this contract as they affect the collection, handling, transportation or disposal of hazardous or dangerous wastes collected by its street sweepers ` 4 10 CONTRACTOR shall maintain accurate records of the sites utilized for disposal of the street sweeping debris At a minimum these records shall show dates and times of transportation and disposal, amount of debris or material disposed, and the name and location of the disposal site used This information shall be provided in the CONTRACTOR's weekly report STREET SiVEEFING CONTPUCT 2002 01128102 Saved as McDonough& Sons—2002 Sweeping 411 Extra care shall be taken in the loading and transportation of street sweeping spoils and other waste so that none of the material to be collected is left either on private property or on the street or alleys Any waste left on private property or on streets or alleys by the CONTRACTOR shall immediately be removed upon notice from the Director of Public Works or his designee at no extra cost to the CITY 412 It shall be the CONTRACTOR's responsibility to dispose of all street sweeping waste in the following manner: 412.1 The CONTRACTOR shall deliver, at it's cost, street sweeping waste to a disposal site operated by King County, or its successors, or such other site or sites as shall be approved by and meets with the disposal requirements of the Washington State Department of Ecology and any other Federal, State or Local Agency or Department with Jurisdiction, provided that the CONTRACTOR shall not use any dump or solid waste disposal site that the CITY would be prohibited from using were the CITY to collect and dispose of street sweeping spoils or waste on its own The CONTRACTOR shall at all times advise the CITY of the disposal site or disposal sites being used by the CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT TEMPORARILY STORE ANY STREET SWEEPING SPOILS OR WASTE AT ANY SITE OTHER THAN A DISPOSAL SITE THAT HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY FOR THAT SPECIFIC PURPOSE V. INDEMNIFICATION AND INSURANCE. 5 1 The CONTRACTOR shall defend, indemnify and hold the CITY, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, injuries, damages, losses or suits, including all legal costs and attorney fees, ansing out of or in connection with the performance of this Agreement, except for injuries and damages caused by the sole negligence of the CITY The CITY'S inspection or acceptance of any of the CONTRACTOR'S work when completed shall not be --rounds to avoid any of these covenants of indemnification Should a court of competent jurisdiction determine that this Agreement is subject to RCW 4 24 115, then, in the event of liability for damages ansing out of bodily injury to persons or damages to property caused by or resulting from the concurrent negligence of the CONTRACTOR and the CITY, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers, the CONTRACTOR'S liability hereunder shall be only to the extent of the CONTRACTOR'S negligence IT IS FURTHER SPECIFICALLY AND EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD THAT THE INDEMNIFICATION PROVIDED HEREIN CONSTITUTES THE CITY'S WAIVER OF IMMUNITY UNDER INDUSTRIAL INSURANCE, TITLE 51 RCW, SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS INDEMNIFICATION. THE PARTIES FURTHER ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THEY HAVE MUTUALLY NEGOTIATED THIS WAIVER. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement 0 STREET SiiEEPING CONTRACT 2002 01128102 Sa%ed as %IcDonough S Sons—2002 Sweeping 8 5 2 The CONTRACTOR shall procure and maintain for the duration of this agreement insurance of the types and in the amounts described below against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may anse from or in connection with the performance of the work by the CONTRACTOR, its agents, representatives, employees, subconsultants or subcontractors. Before beginning work on the project described in this agreement, the CONTRACTOR shall provide a Certificate of Insurance evidencing a Automobile Liability insurance with limits no less than $2,000,000 combined single limit per accident for bodily injury and property damage, and b Commercial General Liabilitv insurance wntten on an occurrence basis with limits no less than S1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence and general aggregate for personal injury, bodily injury and property damage Coverage shall include but not be limited to blanket contractual, products/completed operationsibroad form property damage, explosion, collapse and underground (XCU); and employer's liability c Excess Liabilitv insurance with limits not less than S1,000.000 per occurrence and aggregate Any payment of deductible or self insured retention shall be the sole responsibility of the CONTRACTOR The CITY, its officers, officials, employees. agents and volunteers shall be named as an additional insured on the insurance policy, as respects work performed by or on behalf of the CONTRACTOR and a copy of the endorsement naming the CITY as additional insured shall be attached to the Certificate of Insurance The CONTRACTOR'S insurance shall contain a clause stating that coverage shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respects to the limits of the insurer's liability The CONTRACTOR'S insurance shall be primary insurance as respects the CITY, and the CITY shall be given thirty (10) calendar days prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, of any cancellation, suspension or material change in coverage VI. MISCELLANEOUS. 6 1 CONTRACTOR shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, creed, religion, ancestry, national origin, age, sex, marital status, parental status, sexual orientation, political ideology, the presence of any sensory, mental or physical handicap or the use of a trained guide or service dog by a disabled person, unless based upon bona fide occupational qudlification CONTRACTOR shall take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, color, creed, religion, ancestry, national origin, age, sex, marital status, parental status, sexual orientation, political ideology, the presence of any sensory, mental or physical handicap or the use of a trained guide or service dog by STREET SREEPINC CONTRACT 2002 01128102 Sa%ed as McDonough &Sons—2002 Sweeping 9 a disabled person Such action shall include, but not be limited to the following employment, upgrading, demotion, or transfer, recruitment, or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination, rates of* pay or other forms of compensation, and selection for training, including apprenticeship CONTRACTOR agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices to be provided by the contracting officer setting forth the provisions of this non- discrimination clause Failure to comply with any of the terms of this section shall constitute a breach of this Agreement 6.2 CONTRACTOR affirms that he/she has read and signed the Non-collusion/Mimmum wage combined affidavit & certification form (See exhibit E) CONTRACTOR agrees that this project constitutes "Public Work" for the purpose of complying with the prevailing wage requirements found in RCW 39 12 020, but in all other respects is a SERVICE CONTRACT CONTRACTOR agrees that he/she will be required to pay prevailing wage CONTRACTOR agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices to be provided by the contracting officer setting forth the provisions of this prevailmg«age clause 6 3 Without waiving any of the CITY'S rights against CONTRACTOR for breech of any of the provisions of this contract, CONTRACTOR'S failure to perform any of the duties outlined in Sections 4 6, 4 7 or 6 2 shall constitute a material breach of the contract, subject to immediate termination by the CITY, as well as any other remedies provided by this contract or by law 64 In addition to any other remedy provided herein, the CITY reserves the right to pursue any remedy to compel or force CONTRACTOR and/or its successors and assigns to comply with the contract terms, and the pursuit of any right or remedy by the CITY shall not prevent the CITY from thereafter declaring a forfeiture or revocation for breach of the conditions herein 65 The written provisions and terms of this contract, its exhibits and attachments, shall supersede all prior verbal statements of any officer or other representative of the CITY, and such statements shall not be effective or be construed as entering into or forming a part of, or altering in any manner whatsoever, this contract or the contract documents. 66 No waiver of any of the provisions of this contract shall be binding unless in writing and signed by a duly authorized representative of the CITY 67 If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this contract should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this contract. In the event that any of the provisions of this contract are held to be invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the CITY reserves the right to reconsider the award of this contract and may amend, repeal, add, replace or modify any other provision of this contract, or may terminate this contract. is STREET SWEEPING CONTRACT 2002 01/_78/02 Saved as McDonough&Sons—2002 Sweeping to 66 S Any disputes concerning the performance of the work by the CONTRACTOR (or any subcontractor or 40 any of their officers, partners, employees, agents, heirs, successors and assigns) that cannot be disposed of by agreement shall be referred to the CITY for determination If the CITY's decision is unsatisfactory to the complai ung party and he or she wishes to adjudicate the dispute, he or she must file a demand for Judicial resolution with the King County Superior Court within 30 calendar days of the date of the CITY'S determination If the complaining party fails to file such a demand, he or she shall be deemed to have agreed with the CITY's determination and to have waived his or her rights to make such claim Once the CITY has made a determination regarding a dispute as provided for in this Section, such dispute or claim shall only be determined under the Rules of Practice and Procedure before the King County Superior Court The parties to this Contract shall not attempt to bring any dispute to or before any arbitration or mediation forum unless expressly agreed to in writing by all parties to the dispute 69 All communications regarding this contract shall be sent to the parties at the addresses below Any written notice shall become effective as of the date of mailing by registered or certified mail and shall be deemed sufficiently given if sent to the addressee at the address stated in this agreement or such other address as may hereafter be specified in writing THE PARTIES agree to all terms and conditions of this Agreement OE CITY OF KENT CONTRACTOR by Jim White by its Mavor its DATE DATE ADDRESS ADDRESS City of Kent Engineering Department McDonough & Sons, Inc 220 Fourth Avenue South PO Box 461 Kent, Washington 98032 Ravensdale, Washington 98051-0461 (253) 856-5500/Fax. (253) 856-6500 (425) 432-1054/Fax. (425) 432-3155 STREETS{!EEPING CONTRACT 2002 01128102 Sa%ed as McDonough 3 Sons—2002 Sweeping 11 ATTEST BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM- TOM BRUBAKER, INTERIM CITY ATTORNEY STREET SWEEPING CONTRACT 200Z OU?3102 Sa%ed as McDonough S Sons—2002 Sweepm_ 12 v KeatjClty'ICouncil Meeting 'j1 ' Date j a � ruary 19, 2O02 ( r,a Category Consent Calendar 1 . SUBJECT: DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY GRANT AC 00W, 2001 DROUGHT RELIEF - AUTHORIZE 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the' Public Works Committee, authorization for the Mayor to gn the Dept of Ecology Grant Agreement for 2001 Drought Re,lief, direct staff to accept the grant and authorize the reileement of funds to the various water capital improvement prpje t& 'which were used to finance the City's drought response. 3 . EXHIBITS: Public Works Director Memorandi;k% aid Grant Agreement #G0100215 . f . 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commissioni,_ ite. ) 5. VNBUDQETED FISCAL/PERSOL IL6$ACTs NO YES I 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ � SOURCE OF FUNDS : k 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: ' Councilmember ;moves, CouncilmelaN + seconds, DISCUSSION: ACTION: I touncil Agenda' ? " .item No. 6M r 'I COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Mike A Martin, Chief Administrative Officer PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Don E Wickstrom, P E Public Works Director is _ KEN l Phone Fax 253 B 6-6 00 W.SMINGTOM Address 220 Fourth Avenue S Kent,WA 98032-5895 Date : February 4 , 2002 To . Public Works Committee From: Don Wickstrom, P.E. Subject : Dept of Ecology Grant Agreement G0100215 2001 Drought Project aThe Public Works Department is in receipt of a grant agreement from the Dept of Ecology in the amount of $230, 000 . 00 . Said grant agreement essentially reimburses the City at a rate of 20% for the costs that were incurred by the City regarding our 2001 drought situation. At this time we are requesting that Committee recommends Council authorization for the Mayor to sign the agreement and direct staff to accept the grant . MOTION Recommend authorizing the Mayor to sign the Dept of Ecology Grant Agreement , direct staff to accept the grant and authorize to reimburse the various water capital improvement project funds which were used to finance the City' s drought response . Dought Relief GRANT NO. G0100215 COVERSHEET STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY and CITY OF KENT THIS is a binding agreement entered into by and between the State of Washington,Department of Ecology(P 0 Box 47600, Olympia, Washington, 98504-7600), hereinafter referred to as the DEPARTMENT and the City of Kent, hereinafter referred to as the RECIPIENT to carry out the activities described herein RECIPIENT's Legal Address: City of Kent 220 Fourth Ave. S. Kent, WA 98032-5895 RECIPIENT's Telephone Number 253-856-5610 RECIPIENT's Project Coordinator Brad Lake, Water Department Superintendent The source of funds provided by the DEPARTMENT is Drought Preparedness Account provided by Chapter 399, Laws of 1999 amendmg Chapter 43 83B RCW(Water Supply Facilities) and Chapter 173-167 WAC (Drought Relief) For the purpose of this agreement, the Project Officer assigned for the DEPARTMENT will be Ray Newkirk, 360-407-6630 Grant Amount $230,000 00 Eligible Project Cost. $1,150,000 00 DEPARTMENT Share $230,000 00 RECIPIENT Share- $920,000.00 State Maximum Cost Share Rate- 20 Percent The effective date of this grant is March 14,2001 Any work performed prior to the effective date of this agreement without prior written authorization and specified in the Scope of Work will be at the sole expense and risk of the RECIPIENT. This agreement shall expire no later than June 30, 2002. GRANT NO G0100215 SCOPE OF WORK Prol ect Descnntion Tlus is an emergency project as defined by WAC 173-167 and is to provide drought relief for the City of Kent. The principal project features are: (1) replacement of one of the wells at the 212`s treatment plant site, (2)replacement of a well at Kent Springs, (3) upgrade the Obnen Well facility by installing permanent power, increase capacity of the well pump, telemetry, electrical, controls, and transmission main, (4) construct a treatment plant to take care of manganese and iron problems at the Obnen Well facility, and (5) construct an emergency water intertie with Soos Creek Water and Sewer District Summary of Estimated Costs Item Total Element# Ell able Project Costs 1. Total Direct Construction Cost $1,150,000.00 (including engineering, contract administration, sales tax, and preconstruction costs) TOTAL ELIGIBLE PROJECT COSTS $1,150,000 00 Funding Plan Eligible Project Costs- Grant from DEPARTMENT (20% of eligible costs) $230,000 00 RECIPIENT's funds (80%of eligible costs) $920,000.00 TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $1,150,000.00 Page 2of7 GRANT NO G0100215 SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS A. WATER WELL CONSTRUCTION All water well construction covered by this agreement shall comply with the following standards- 1. Minimum Standards for Construction and Maintenance of Wells, Chapter 173- 160 WAC. 2 Water Well Construction Act (1971), Chapter 18.104 RCW. A copy of these standards is attached to this agreement B REQUIREMENTS FOR INSTALLATION, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF FLOW METERS All water well construction covered by this agreement shall install, operate, and maintain a flow meter on each well to comply with the following WAC 508-64-020 METER SPECIFICATIONS All meters required to be installed, as provided under WAC 508-64-010, shall meet the following requirements (1)Meters shall be of the velocity-propeller type with enclosed propeller made of non-corrosive materials or of the sonic flow meter type. Positive displacement and other types of meters may be used with the express approval of the Department of Ecology. Although not cited in WAC 508-64, sonic flow meters have been approved by the Central Regional Office Water Resource Program of the Department of Ecology as an acceptable alternative to the velocity-propeller type meter All meters shall be line meters Meters shall be complete with meter head, register box with locking hasp, and straightening vanes for attachments to existing pipe or contained within a tube. The saddle or tube-type meters shall be of a construction such that any part of the propeller, gears, shafts, totalizer, or any other moving part can be removed for repair with relative ease The saddle-type meter shall be designed and constructed so as to be suitable for welding or bolting to the existing or installed steel pipe but with removable meter head or designed so that it may be secured to the pipe by anchor bars welded to the pipe with U-bolts, or with threaded straps All meters shall have the size, serial number, and direction of the flow through the meter properly and clearly indicated. (2)The meter shall have a rated accuracy of plus or minus 2 percent of actual flow for all rates of flow within the range of flow for which the meter is designed. The meter shall register the full range of discharge from the source of water for which it is to be used (3) The meter shall have a visual, digital totalizer located on or adjacent to the meter The register shall be protected. Page 3 of 7 GRANT NO. G0100215 (4)Units of measure for irrigation uses shall be in acre-feet The totalizer shall read directly in acre-feet with six digits to read to the nearest hundredths (0000.00). Both the register and meter unit shall be provided with a method of sealing with a wire or lead seal to prevent unauthorized tampering For other uses, different units of measurement may be used with the express approval of the Department of Ecology All totalizers or registers shall be equipped to enable taking instantaneous readings. (5)Register Boxes—The register box shall have a protective lunged cover over the window glass Register box screws shall be drilled for seal wire holes. (6)Propeller—The propeller shall be made of polyethylene or equivalent corrosion-resistant material and such that it will operate effectively and without distortion at temperatures between 32' and 100' Fahrenheit The propeller shall be located in the center of the pipe and normal to the centerlme of flow The measuring propeller, together with its spindle, shall be the same specific gravity as water or less. WAC 508-64-030 METER INSTALLATION REOUIREMENTS Meters required to be installed under WAC 508-64-010, shall meet the following installation requirements. (1) The meter shall be installed in accordance with manufacturer specifications and in such a manner that there shall be a full pipe of water at all times when water is being withdrawn (2) Straightening vanes shall be installed in the pipe in the manner recommended by the manufacturer of the meter, or vanes may be part of the tube furnished with tube- type meters or separate units for installation in the discharge pipe upstream of the meter (3) There shall be no turnouts or diversions between the source of water and the meter installation, except for faucet or other similar small outlets (4) The meter shall be placed in the pipe not less than five pipe diameters downstream from any valves, elbows, or other obstructions which might create turbulent flow, or as recommended by the meter manufacturer There shall also be at least one pipe diameter of unobstructed flow on the downstream side of the meter. (5) The meter and register shall not be enclosed in a building or structure in such a manner as to prevent access to the register. The register or meter shelter may be equipp3ed with a lock to prevent tampering or breakage,provided that a key is made available to authorized employees of the Department of Ecology at the place of business during normal working hours or at the residence in case of private parties (6) Provisions shall be made for removal and rating of the meter in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications (7) In those cases where wells are authorized for the purpose of supplementing surface waters with water from combined sources not to exceed a total quantity,both sources of water shall be metered. (8) In the case of artesian wells which flow at times, the meter shall be installed in a manner which will measure both pumped and flowing discharge (9) The owner shall cause the Department of Ecology to be notified within ten y. days from the installation of the meter. (10) The meter installation shall be inspected and approved by the Department of Ecology Page 4 of 7 GRANT NO GO 100215 WAC 508-64-040. METER OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE- Meters installed hereunder shall be operated and maintained in accordance with the following. x (1)No withdrawal or diversion of water shall be made unless the meter installation has been inspected and approved by the Department of Ecology and is in proper operating condition. (2)Meters shall be repaired and returned to operation as soon as possible upon discovery of a malfunctioning meter The Department of Ecology shall be notified immediately of such malfunctioning meter In all cases the meter reading immediately prior to repair and the reading of the new or repaired meter shall be submitted to the Department of Ecology on forms provided within ten days following reinstallation of the meter and/or meter head. (3) Water use data shall be submitted to the Department of Ecology on forms provided for that purpose at such times as may be required by the Department. (4)Meters shall be kept clear of debris or any other material or vegetative growth which would impede their operation. All meters shall be lubricated as specified by the manufacturer. (5) Meters which are not properly operated and maintained shall be repaired or replaced upon order of the Department of Ecology within the time specified within said order C INSPECTIONS 1. Any and all work undertaken by the RECIPIENT pursuant to this grant shall be open and subject to inspection by the DEPARTMENT at all times during the progress thereof and upon completion. D REPORTS The RECIPIENT shall prepare and furnish to the DEPARTMENT the following report Upon completion of the construction work, a final proiect summary report shall be X submitted to the DEPARTMENT in a form designated by the DEPARTMENT. The project summary report shall be signed by the chief project engineer responsible for the project, declaring that the project was, to the best of his/her knowledge, constructed and completed in accordance with the approved project plans, designs, specifications, and change orders E WORK TO BE PERFORMED To the extent that funds therefore may now or hereafter be available pursuant to the terms of this grant, the RECIPIENT shall, on its own account, or by contract or contracts, undertake the work and special conditions, described and set forth in the Scope of Work of this grant, substantially in accordance with the approved designs,plans, and specifications Page 5 of 7 GRANT NO. G0100215 F COSTS OF THE RECIPIENT is Funding under this grant shall be limited to those costs approved by the DEPARTMENT which have been reasonably incurred or are to be incurred by the RECIPIENT in the exercise of sound engineering and construction. Such costs may include,but are not necessarily limited to, surveys and investigations in connection with the project; costs for preparation of designs; plans, and specifications, engineer's estimates, legal work; supplies, material; equipment rental; labor;payments under construction contracts; acquiring lands or any interests in lands necessary for construction, administrative work directly related to project construction; and other costs relating to the work all as aooroved by the DEPARTMENT as having been, or to be reasonably incurred. G. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE The RECIPIENT shall cause the project to be operated in an efficient and economical manner, shall provide for the making of all repairs,renewals, and replacements necessary to the efficient operation of the same; and shall cause the same to be maintained in an efficient condition, ordinary and reasonable wear and depreciation expected. H ALL WRITINGS CONTAINED HEREIN This agreement, consisting of the Coversheet, Scope of Work, Special Terms and Conditions and the appended "General Terms and Conditions," the DEPARTMENT's current edition of"Administrative Requirements for Ecology Grants and Loans," and Appendix A contain the entire understanding between the parties, and there are no other understandings or representations set forth or incorporated by reference herein No subsequent modification(s) or amendment(s) of this agreement shall be of any force or effect unless in writing, signed by authorized representatives of the RECIPIENT and DEPARTMENT, and made apart of this agreement, EXCEPT, this in relation to change of the DEPARTMENT's Project Officer, or the RECIPIENT's Project Coordinator as set forth on the Grant Coversheet, either party may make such change by sending a letter to that effect without the signature of the other party, EXCEPT, that in relation to the time for performance on the Coversheet, the DEPARTMENT may modify or amend the grant agreement without the signature of the other parties Page 6 of 7 GRANT NO G0100215 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereby execute this grant STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY CITY OF KENT JOE STOHR Date JIM WHITE Date PROGRAM MANAGER MAYOR WATER RESOURCES PROGRAM Approved as to form only by Assistant Attorney General. TAX ID#E 91-6001254 i i Page 7 of 7 GRANT NO G0100215 Appendix A GUIDELINE. SUBMISSION OF A19-I VOUCHER AND SUPPORTIVE DOCUMENTS (COST REIMBURSEMENT) The purpose of this appendix is to assist the RECIPIENT in determining allowable items of cost. If the RECIPIENT fails to name an item of cost in the request for payment, this does not imply it is either allowable or unallowable, rather, determination of allowability shall be based upon the treatment of similar or related items of cost 1 Factors Allowing Cost In order to be allowable, costs must, a. Be necessary and reasonable and not be a general expense, b. Not be prohibited by any laws or regulations, C. Conform to any cost limitations or exclusions, d. Be consistent with state and federal (when applicable)policies,regulations and procedures, e. Be given consistent treatment through uniform accounting principles, f Not be allocated to or included as a cost of any other state/federally financed program,past, or present, g. Be net of all allowable credits. 2. Certification To assure expenditures are proper, vouchers requesting payment must be certified by the RECIPIENT. Form A19-1 has a certification provision which must be signed by the RECIPIENT or its authorized representative before payment will be allowed 3 Credits The applicable portion of any income, rebate, allowance, and other credit relating to any allowable cost, received by or accruing to the RECIPIENT, must be credited to the DEPARTMENT, either as a cost reduction, or by cash refund, as appropriate. 4. Unforeseen/Emergency Expenditures i A contingency line item providing a specified amount for reimbursements for unforeseen expenditures may be made only with the prior written approval of the DEPARTMENT A-1 GRANT NO G0100215 5 Allowable Costs Generally, whether costs are allowable depending upon cost principles applicable to the particular project agreement However, certain costs are commonly allowed These include advertising compensation for personal services depreciation and use allowances employee fringe benefits employee morale, health and welfare maintenance and repair materials and supplies memberships, subscriptions and professional activities taxes training and education transportation travel Employee benefits in the form of regular compensation paid to employees during penods of authorized absences from the job, such as for annual leave, sick leave, court leave, military leave, and the like, if they are (1) provided pursuant to an approved leave system, and (2) the cost thereof is equitably allocated to all related activities, including grant programs Employee benefits in the form of employers' contribution or expenses for social security, employees' life and health insurance plans, unemployment insurance coverage, workmen's compensation insurance, pension plans, severance pay, and the like, provided such benefits are granted under approved plans and are distributed equitably to grant programs and to other activities Where any questions involving allowability of costs anse, the DEPARTMENT'S project officer should be consulted, otherwise, certain costs may be disallowed 6 Payroll and Distribution of Time Amounts charged for personal service, regardless of whether treated as direct or indirect costs, will be based on payrolls documented and approved in accordance with the generally accepted practice of the state or local agency Payrolls must be supported by time and attendance or equivalent records for individual employees. Salaries and wages of employees chargeable to more than one cost objective must be supported by appropriate time distribution records The method used should produce an equitable distribution of time and effort. Such time records must be certified by the project director. Such certified records are the only allowable source document for charging and reporting personnel expenditures. A_� GRANT NO G0100215 7 Unallowable Costs Certain costs are commonly disallowed These unallowable costs include: bad debts contingencies contributions and donations entertainment fines and penalties interest and other financial costs underrecovery of costs under grant agreements Once agam, whether a cost is unallowable depends upon the applicable cost principles to the agreement. Failure to clarify any question whether a cost is unallowable or allowable may result in its disallowance by the DEPARTMENT s A-3 GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS Pertaining to Grant and Loan Agreements of the Department of Ecology A. RECIPIENT PERFORMANCE All activities for which grant/loan funds are to be used shall be accomplished by the RECIPIENT and RECIPIENTS employees The RECIPIENT shall not assignor subcontract performance to others unless specifically authorized in writing by the DEPARTMENT B. SUBGRANTEE/CONTRACfORCOMPLIANCE The RECIPIENT must ensure that all subgrantees and contractors comply with the terms and conditions of this agreement. C THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARY The RECIPIENT shall ensure that in all subcontracts entered into by the RECIPIENT pursuant to this agreement,the state of Washington is named as an express third-party beneficiary of such subcontracts with full rights as such. D CONTRACTING FOR SERVICES(BIDDING) Contracts for construction,purchase of equipment and professional architectural and engineering services shall be awarded through a competitive process,if required by State law RECIPIENT shall retain copies of all bids received and contracts awarded,for inspection and use by the DEPARTMENT E. ASSIGNMENTS No right or claim of the RECIPIENT arising under this agreement shall be transferred or assigned by the RECIPIENT F COMPLIANCE WITH ALL LAWS 1. The RECIPIENT shall comply fully with all applicable Federal,State and local laws,orders,regulations and permits. Prior to commencement of any construction,the RECIPIENT shall secure the necessary approvals and permits required by authonties having jurisdiction over the project,provide assurance to the DEPARTMENT that all approvals and permits have been secured,and make copies available to the DEPARTMENT upon request 2 Discrimmati The DEPARTMENT and the RECIPIENT agree to be bound by all Federal and State laws,regulations,and policies against discrimmation. The RECIPIENT further agrees to affirmatively support the program of the Office of Minority and Women's Business Enterprises to the maximum extent possible.The RECIPIENT shall report to the DEPARTMENT the percent of grant/loan funds available to women or minority owned businesses 3 Wages And Job Safetv.The RECIPIENT agrees to comply with all applicable laws,regulations,and policies of the United States and the State of Washington which affect wages and Job safety 4 Industrial Insurance.The RECIPIENT certifies fall compliance with all applicable state industrial insurance requirements. If the RECIPIENT fails to comply with such laws,the DEPARTMENT shall have the right to immediately terminate this agreement for cause as provided in Section K.1,herein G IQCKBACKS The RECIPIENT is prohibited from inducing by any means any person employed or otherwise involved in this project to give up any part of the compensation to which hetshe is otherwise entitled or,receive any fee, commission or gift in return for award of a subcontract hereunder. H AUDITS AND INSPECTIONS I The RECIPIENT shall maintain complete program and financial records relating to this agreement Such records shall clearly indicate total receipts and expenditures by fund source and task or object All grant/loan records shall be kept in a manner which provides an audit trail for all expenditures. All records shall be kept in a common file to facilitate audits and inspections Engineering documentation and field inspection reports of all construction work accomplished under this agreement shall be maintained by the RECIPIENT 1 2. All grant/loan records shall be open for audit or inspection by the DEPARTMENT or by any duly authorized audit representative of the State of Washington for a period of at least three years after the final grant payment/loan repayment or any dispute resolution hereunder If any such audits identify discrepancies in the financial records,the RECIPIENT shall provide clarification and/or make adjustments accordingly. 3. All work performed under this agreement and any equipment purchased,shall be made available to the DEPARTMENT and to any authorized state,federal or local representative for inspection at any time during the course of this agreement and for at least three years following grant/loan tetmmation or dispute resolution hereunder. 4. RECIPIENT shall meet the provisions in OMB Circular A-133(Audits of States,Local Governments& Non Profit Organizations)or OMB Circular A-110(Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants& Agreements with Institutions of Higher Education,Hospitals and Other Non-Profit Organizations)if the RECIPIENT receives federal finds in excess of$300,000 The RECIPIENT must forward a copy of the state auditor's audit along with the RECIPIENT response and the final corrective action plan as approved by the SAO to the DEPARTMENT within ninety(90)days of the date of the audit report. I PERFORMANCE REPORTING The RECIPIENT shall submit progress reports to the DEPARTMENT with each payment request or such other schedule as set forth in the Special Conditions. The RECIPIENT shall also report in writing to the DEPARTMENT any problems,delays or adverse conditions which will materially affect their ability to meet project objectives or time schedules This disclosure shall be accompanied by a statement of the action taken or proposed and any assistance needed from the DEPARTMENT to resolve the situation. Payments may be withheld if required progress reports are not submitted. J COMPENSATION 1. Method of compensation Payment shall normally be made on a reimbursable as specified in the grant agreement and no more often than once per month Each request for payment will be submitted by the RECIPIENT on State voucher request forms provided by the DEPARTMENT along with documentation of the expenses. Payments shall be made for each task/phase of the project,or portion thereof as set out in the Scope of Work when completed by the RECIPIENT and certified as satisfactory by the Project Officer. The payment request form and supportive documents must itemize all allowable costs by major elements as described in the Scope of Work. Instructions for submitting the payment requests are found in"Administrative Requirements for Ecology Giants and Loans",part W,published by the DEPARTMENT. A copy of this document shall be furnished to the RECIPIENT. When payment requests are approved by the DEPARTMENT,payments will be made to the mutually agreed upon designee. Payment requests shall be submitted to the DEPARTMENT and directed to the Project Officer assigned to administer this agreement 2. Budttet deviation Deviations in budget amounts are not allowed without written amendment(s)to this agreement Payment requests will be disallowed when the RECIPIENTS request for reimbursement exceeds the State maximum share amount for that element,as described in the Scope of Work. 3. Period of Compensation Payments shall only be made for action of the RECIPIENT pursuant to the grant/loan agreement and performed after the effective date and prior to the expiration date of this agreement,unless those dates are spectfirally modified in writing as provided herein. 4 Final Reauest(s)for Pavmant The RECIPIENT must submit final requests for compensation within forty-five(45)days after the expiration date of this agreement and within fifteen(15)days after the ehd of a fiscal biennium.Failure to comply may result in delayed reimbursement 5 Performance Guarantee. The DEPARTMENT may withhold an amount not to exceed ten percent(10°/a) of each reimbursement payment as security for the RECIPIENTS performance and a financial bond Monies withheld by the DEPARTMENT may be paid to the RECIPIENT when the project(s)described herein,or a portion thereof;have been completed it in the DEPARTMENTS sole discretion,such payment is reasonable and approved according to this agreement and,as appropriate,upon completion of an audit as specified under section J.6.,herein 6. Unauthonzed Expenditures All payments to the RECIPIENT shall be subject to final audit by the DEPARTMENT and any unauthorized expenditure(s)charged to this grant/loan shall be refunded to the DEPARTMENT by the RECIPIENT 2 7 Mileage and Per Diem. If mileage and per diem are paid to the employees of the RECIPIENT or other public entities,it shall not exceed the amount allowed under state law for state employees 8 Overhead Costs No reimbursement for overhead costs shall be allowed unless provided for in the Scope of Work hereunder K TERMINATION I For Cause The obligation of the DEPARTMENT to the RECIPIENT is contingent upon satisfactory performance by the RECIPIENT of all of its obligations under this agreement. In the event the RECIPIENT unjustifiably fails,m the opinion of the DEPARTMENT,to perform any obligation required of it by this agreement,the DEPARTMENT may refuse to pay any further funds thereunder and/or terminate this agreement by giving written notice of termination. A written notice of termination shall be given at least five working days prior to the effective date of termination. In that event,all finished or unfinished documents,data studies,surveys,drawings,maps, models,photographs,and reports or other materials prepared by the RECIPIENT under this agreement, at the option of the DEPARTMENT,shall become Department property and the RECIPIENT shall be entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for any satisfactory work completed on such documents and other materials Despite the above,the RECIPIENT shall not be reheved of any liability to the DEPARTMENT for damages sustained by the DEPARTMENT and/or the State of Washington because of any breach of agreement by the RECIPIENT. The DEPARTMENT may withhold payments for the purpose of setoff until such time as the exact amount of damages due the DEPARTMENT from the RECIPIENT is determined 2 bmfficient Funds The obligation of the DEPARTMENT to make payments is contingent on the availability of state and federal funds through legislative appropriation and state allotment When this agreement crosses over state fiscal years the obligation of the DEPARTMENT is contingent upon the appropriation of funds during the next fiscal year. The failure to appropriate or allot such funds shall be good cause to terminate this agreement as provided in paragraph IC I above. When this agreement crosses the RECIPIENTS fiscal year,the obligation of the RECIPIENT to continue or complete the project described herein shall be contingetit upon appropriation of funds by the RECIPIENTS governing body,Provided,however,that nothing contained herein shall preclude the DEPARTMENT from demanding repayment of ALL funds paid to the RECIPIENT in accordance with Section O herein. 3 Failure to Commence Work In the event the RECIPIENT fails to commence work on the project funded herein within four months after the effective date of this agreement,or by any date mutually agreed upon in writing for commencement of work,the DEPARTMENT reserves the right to terminate this agreement L WAIVER Waiver of any RECIPIENT default is not a waiver of any subsequent defauk Waiver of a breach of any provision of this agreement is not a waiver of any subsequent breach and will not be construed as a modification of the terms of this agreement unless stated as such in writing by the authorized representative of the DEPARTMENT. M. PROPERTY RIGHTS I Copyrights and Patents When the RECIPIENT creates any copyrightable materials or invents any patentable property,the RECIPIENT may copyright or patent the same but the DEPARTMENT retains a royalty-free,nonexclusive and irrevocable license to reproduce,pubhsh,recover or otherwise use the material(s)or property and to authorize others to use the same for federal,state or local government purposes Where federal funding is involved,the federal government may have a proprietary interest in patent tights to any inventions that developed by the RECIPIENT as provided in 35 U.S.C.200-212 2 Publications. When the RECIPIENT or persuas employed by the RECIPIENT use or pubhsh information of the DEPARTMENT,present papers,lectures,or seminars involving information supplied by the DEPARTMENT;use logos,reports,maps or other data,in printed reports,signs,brochures, pamphlets,etc,appropriate credit shall be given to the DEPARTMENT. 3 Tangible Property Rights The DEPARTMENTS current edition of"Administrative Requirements for Ecology Grants and Loans",Part V,shall control the use and disposition of all real and personal property purchased wholly or in part with funds furnished by the DEPARTMENT in the absence of state,federal 3 smtute(s),regulation(s),or policy(s)to the contrary or upon specific instructions with respect thereto in the Scope of Work 4. Personal Property Furnished by the DEPARTMENT When the DEPARTMENT provides personal Property directly to the RECIPIENT for use in performance ofthe project,it shall be returned to the DEPARTMENT prior to final payment by the DEPARTMENT. If said property is lost,stolen or damaged while in the RECIPIENTS possession,the DEPARTMENT shall be reimbursed in cash or by setoff by the RECIPIENT for the fair market value of such property 5. Acquisition Proiecis The following provisions shall apply if the project covered by this agreement includes funds for the acquisition of land or facilities a. Prior to disbursement of fiords provided for in this agreement,the RECIPIENT shall establish that the cost of Ind/or facilities is fan and reasonable b. The RECIPIENT shall provide satisfactory evidence of title or ability to acquire title for each parcel prior to disbursement of fiords provided by this agreement Such evidence may include title insurance policies,Torrens certificates,or abstracts,and attorneys opinions establishing that the land is free from any impediment,hen,or claim which would impair the uses contemplated by this agreement 6 Conversions Regardless of the contract termination date shown on the cover sheet,the RECIPIENT shall not at any time convert any equipment,property or facility acquired or developed pursuant to this agreement to uses other than those for which assistance was originally approved without prior written approval of the DEPARTMENT. Such approval may be conditioned upon payment to the DEPARTMENT of that portion of the proceeds of the sate,lease or other conversion or encumbrance which monies granted pursuant to this agreement bear to the total acquisition,purchase or construction costs of such property. N. RECYCLED/RECYCLABLEPAPER All documents and materials published under this agreement shall be produced on recycled paper containing the highest level of post consumer and recycled content that is available. At a minimum,paper with 10 percent post consumer content and 50 percent recycled content shall be used Whenever possible,all materials shall be published on paper that is unbleached or has not been treated with chlorine gas and/or hypochlorite As appropriate,all materials shall be published on both sides of the paper and shall minimize the use of glossy or colored paper and other items which reduce the recyclabilrty of the document O. RECOVERY OF PAYMENTS TO RECIPIENT The right of the RECIPIENT to retain monies paid to it as reimbursement payments is contingent upon satisfactory performance of this agreement including the satisfactory completion of the project described in the Scope of Work In the event the RECIPIENT fails,for any reason,to perform obligations required of it by this agreement,the RECIPIENT may,at the DEPARTMENTs sole discretion,be required to repay to the DEPARTMENT all grant/loan fiords disbursed to the RECIPIENT for those parts of the project that are rendered worthless in the opinion of the DEPARTMENT by such failure to perform. Interest shall accrue at the rate of twelve percent(12%)per annum from the time the DEPARTMENT demands repayment of funds. If payments have been discontinued by the DEPARTMENT due to insufficient fiords as in Section K.2 above,the RECIPIENT shall not be obligated to repay monies which had been paid to the RECIPIENT prior to such ter ntrumon Any property acquired under this agreement,at the option of the DEPARTMENT,may become the DEPARTMENTS property and the RECIPIENTS liability to repay monies shall be reduced by an amount reflecting the fair value of such property. P. PROJECT APPROVAL The extent and character of all work and services to be performed under this agreement by the RECIPIENT shall be subject to the review and approval of the DEPARTMENT through the Project Officer or other designated official to whom the RECIPIENT shall report and be responsible In the event there is a dispute with regard to the extent and character of the work to be done,the determination of the Project Officer or other designated official as to the extent and character of the work to be done shall govern The RECIPIENT shall have the right to appeal decisions as provided for below. Q DISPUTES Except as otherwise provided in this agreement,any dispute concerning a question of fact arising under this agreement which is not disposed of in writing shall be decided by the Project Officer or other designated official who shall provide a written statement of decision to the RECIPIENT. The decision of the Project Officer or 4 other designated official shall be final and conclusive unless,within thirty days from the date of receipt of such statement,the RECIPIENT mails or otherwise furnishes to the Director of the DEPARTMENT a written appeal In connection with appeal of any proceeding under this clause,the RECIPIENT shall have the opportunity to be heard and to offer evidence in support of this appeal The decision of the Director or duly authorized representative for the determination of such appeals shall be final and conclusive Appeals from the Director's determination shall be brought in the Superior Court of Thurston County Renew of the decision of the Director will not be sought before either the Pollution Control Hearings Board or the Shoreline Hearings Board Pending final decision of dispute hereunder,the RECIPIENT shall proceed diligently with the performance of this agreement and in accordance with the decision rendered. R. CONFLICT OF INTEREST No officer,member,agent,or employee of either party to this agreement who exercises any function or responsibility in the renew,approval,or carrying out of this agreement,shall participate in any decision which affects his/her personal interest or the interest of any corporation,partnership or association in which he/she is, directly or indirectly interested,nor shall be/she have any personal or pecuniary interest,direct or indirect,in this agreement or the proceeds thereof S INDEMNIFICATION 1 The DEPARTMENT shall in no way be held responsible for payment of salaries,consultant's fees,and other costs related to the project described herem,except as provided in the Scope of Work 2 To the extent that the Constitution and laws of the State of Washington permit,each party shall indemnify and hold the other harmless from and against any liability for any or all injuries to persons or property arising from the neghgent act or omission of that parry or that party's agents or employees arising out of this agreement T. GOVERNING LAW This agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Washington. U. SEVERABILM If any provision of this agreement or any provision of any document incorporated by reference shall be held mvand,such invalidity shall not affect the other provisions of this agreement which can be given effect without the mvand provision,and to this end the provisions of this agreement are declared to be severable V PRECEDENCE In the event of inconsistency in this agreement,unless otherwise provided herein,the inconsistency shall be resolved by giving precedence in the following order. (a)applicable Federal and State statutes and regulations; (b)Scope of Work;(c)Special Terms and Conditions,(d)Any terms incorporated herein by reference including the"Administrative Requirements for Ecology Grants and Loans";and(e)the General Terns and Conditions SS-010 Rev. 10/00 5 A ? Kent Mity Council meeting DatlAruary 19 , 2002 r r( Gates resent Calend$r i 1. S J T: GOLF COURSK SYSTEM SOFTWARE i�` AUTHORIZE i 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Approval of the Goliico4�lex Management ' System software and related products purch e , Ci authorization for the Mayor to sign a contract with szel'x Porp For that purchase, including support services, subj t to City Attorney approval of contract documents. A key focus of Technology Plan I was an inQpbtk3eiit -in Financial s and Cashiering systems, , This project is. f^ sa, 60M Technology' Plan I . J The Golf Complex Management System will he the 1Ri.verbend Golf Complex provide better Customer service by, raessing customer transactions quicker, hacking customer aCiylwith integrated software, and automating time tasks, such a as issuing gift certificates, and prepar�.xt�tr ment quotes and contracts . In addition, the system i n p cashiering, inventory management, a,itditing, and report4. $ gaaoabilities. A Golf Complex Management, System Selection p 0#0#ttee was formed; to establish system req irements, issue 0 kgpesf,,ifor Proposal, evaluate vendor responsesy conduct products',i t1kopnotrations, and , recommend a Golf Comply. Management Systw ol,�tion. After , evaluating the vendor tesponses and product mstrations, the Selection Committee recommended the sZen, , gcsal . 3 . EXHIBITS: Operations ' Committee memo 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: erat ' ns Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commissioni 'liitcO 5 . UNEUDGETED FISCAL/PERS �L IMPACT: No YES 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: 4f84_678 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Technology Plan I 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: k , Councilmember ; .moves Councilmembe seconds ,z¢ DISCUSSION: t ACTION: :Council Agend# Item No. 6N ` t KENT INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DATE: January 29, 2002 TO: Council Operations Committee FROM: Dan Meeker,Senior Web Systems Analyst RE: Golf Complex Management System/Purchase Recommendation Background A key focus of Technology Plan I was an investment in Financial and Cashiering systems This project is funded from the Technology Plan I budget. This project is consistent with those objectives Until Fall 2001 this project had been identified to be included in Technology Plan II This project has been accelerated for a variety of reasons 1) support for the existing Golf System is extremely poor, 2) the existing golf system hardware is all in need of replacement, 3) sufficient Technology Plan I budget funds are available, and 4)the time window for completing this project closes in April 2002, because this project needs to be completed before the busy season at the Golf Course begins The City of Kent selected point-of-sale software in 1997 for use at the Riverbend Golf Complex. The system was used by SSMD employees through the end of 1999, and was reconfigured for use by City staff and the new golf management contract users beginning in January 2000. We have been unable to get consistent technical support for the current software. The current point- of-sale software does not include tee time reservation, tournament preparation, and gift certificate functionality, so those processes have remained manual. The new golf system includes that functionality, as well as inventory management and point-of-sale cashiering Process The selection process began in October 2001 with the formation of the Golf System Selection Committee. The Selection Committee consisted of representatives from the Riverbend Golf Complex, Finance Services, and Information Technology In November 2001, the Selection Committee began establishing systems requirements, vendor evaluation criteria, and researching the Golf software market. The research and requirements gathering resulted in the City releasing a Request for Proposal (RFP) on November 27, 2001 The City distributed 29 RFPs to Golf System vendors throughout the US and Canada and received 4 responses After evaluating each proposal and checking each vendor's refer aces, the Selection Committee determined that two proposals, from Pro-ShopKeeper and sZen Corp, merited vendor product demonstrations and subsequently scheduled the demonstrations Upon completion of the site visits,the Selection Committee recommended the sZen Corp proposal based on sZen's customer service,product functionality, customer references, and cost Parks System Selection Committee Representatives Pete Peterson, Golf Operations Superintendent—Riverbend Golf Complex Melame Manning, Financial Analyst—Riverbend Golf Complex Cyndi Wilbur, Capital Projects Analyst—Finance Services Dan Meeker, Semor Web Systems Analyst—Information Technology Benefits of the Golf Complex Management System • The software was developed expressly for managing all the daily activities of golf courses tee time reservations, scheduling lessons with golf pros, selling greens fees, merchandise, and food; inventory management, and a customer database • The Riverbend Golf Complex will provide better customer service by processing customer transactions quicker, tracking customer activity with integrated software, and automating time-consuming tasks (e.g, issuing gift certificates,preparing tournament quotes and contracts) • The system has excellent audit and reporting features. Project Costs The total project cost is projected to be $98,678. This project is anticipated to begin in February 2002, and to be completely operational by April 1, 2002 SZen Corp's "Eighteen" System $55,378 Includes Point of Sale, Inventory Management, Tee Time Reservations, Lesson Scheduling, Tournament Management,point of sale equipment, installation, data conversion, training, sales tax. Hardware to be acquired by the City(due for replacement in 2002) $34,400 Includes a database server,personal computers, and laser printers. Computers will be purchased using Washington State DIS contract. Contingency Funds $ 8,900 Total $98,678 Motion: To approve this project and to authorize the Mayor to sign a contract with sZen Corp for the purchase of Golf Complex Management Systems and Services, subject to City Attorney approval of contract documents k ;, 4 incil Meetiro . ;A 1 4 t5 ruary 19, 20 5 #j �iObftaent Calen4� I . SUBJECT: REAL ESTA4TW 801CISE TAX AME ' TNAPSCE Y STASeEE¢ : Adoption of Ordi " Ida. i?' relating,, 1, I -- to real estate excise taxes . I, The proposed ordinanee'iiaj' s house cleani yae an x d does not modify or amend tho,, schedule of taed^, or coliecte by the City. Currentli'4 the Kept City C " "1 the City's ' real estate excise taxIlunder two separato do ,,,, t�dpters. Chapter 3 . 19 of the Ke*t City Code levied*', � o#sle tax on the sale of real estate within the City's', ' z'r e limits . Chapter 3 .24 of the Kent; City Code also rs;jisjtor an additional X of 1% exolse, tax levy. Have ",� ci apters in the Kent City Code relating to real estatw� 0 tax is confusing, and consol'idAting all provisiroot tune chapter would be more approprie,o This Ordinance;, ng;Ascr clarifies Council ' s direction to re6trict the appllo i0* of the 'A of 1%, additional excise tax fear parks operation :. q �ptenance purposes. 3 . EXRIBITS: Ordinance 4 . RECOiENDED BY: 6 �, (Committee, Staff, E*i er, CommTs—s-4T x + ' ! , 5 . UNBUDQET83? FISCAL/PERACI': YES � 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: ' SOURCE OF FUNDS: — — , 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION; ;y Councilmember moues, Council,meam3i4 µ 'ad �1 second$, DISCUSSION: a ACTION:{ � "� 1-�iCbuncil Agenda item No. 60 h ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, amending Chapter 3 19 of the Kent City Code entitled, 'Excise Tax on Real Estate Sales," by- (i) consolidating certain provisions of Chapter 3 24 entitled, "Real Estate Excise Tax," into Chapter 3 19, (u) clarifying that the additional one-quarter percent is for the development and maintenance of parks projects; and (ni) repealing Chapter 3 24. WHEREAS, Chapter 3 19 of the Kent City Code provides for the levying of an excise tax on the sale of real estate within the corporate limits of the City, and WHEREAS, Chapter 3 24 of the Kent City Code also relates to the levying of an excise tax on the sale of real estate within the corporate limits of the City by providing for an additional levy of such excise tax, and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that having two chapters in the Kent City Code relating to real estate excise tax is duplicative and confusing and that having all provisions relating to real estate excise tax consolidated into one chapter would be more appropriate; NOW THEREFORE, 1 Amendment to Excise Tax on Real Estate Sales THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS SECTION 1. - Amendment Chapter 3 19 of the Kent City Code, entitled "Excise Tax on Real Estate Sales," is hereby amended to read as follows CHAPTER 3.19. EXCISE TAX ON REAL ESTATE SALES Sec. 3.19.010. Tax levied. A Imposition. Pursuant to RCW 82 46 010, Tthere is hereby imposed an excise tax on each sale of real property, constituting a taxable event as defined in RCW 82 45.010 et seq and occurring within the corporate limits of the city. The rate of tax imposed by this section shall be one-quarter(1/4) of one (1) percent of the selling price of all real property upon which this tax is imposed by this subsection The ta*imposed A 1., ., eetion shall be eelleeted fi:efn persefts whe are taxa le by the state tinder U(`W O2 45 010 et seq .,.1 siaeh ta* shell eamply .4h all appheable _„le,. b ..' lawsea., ..a .. estateeiketse ta*esimposed J the sWe tinder RG3X 92 A5 010 et se.— B Ra a el't The FMe e f t„ p ed 1.y t� As .,t,., ..h.,ll be Afte Ejuuter a f e e (1) pereeat e f the selling pnee e f all ..enl p pe.ty upon A. eh this tax is tmpesed h.. this efr B Additional excise tax. Pursuant to RCW 82 46 035, there is hereby imposed an additional excise tax on each sale of real property constituting a taxable event as defined in RCW 82 45 010 et seq and occurring within the comorate limits of the city for the development and maintenance of parks projects The rate of the additional tax imposed under this chapter shall be one-quarter (1/4) of one (1) percent of the selling price on real property upon which this tax is imposed by this subsection C Other The taxes imposed under this section shall be collected from persons who are taxable by the state under Chapter 82 45 RCW and Chapter 458-61 WAC upon th occurrence of any taxable event as defined therem, within the corporate 2 Amendment to Excise Tax on Real Estate Sales limits of the city Additionally, the taxes imposed under this section shall comply with all applicable rules, regulations, laws, and court decisions regarding real estate excise taxes imposed by the state under Chapter 82 45 RCW and Chapter 458-61 WAC The provisions of those chapters shall apply as though fully set forth herein Sec. 3.19.020. Capital improvements—Use and limitations. A Use of proceeds Subject to the limitations specified in this chapter, aAll proceeds from the tax unposed by this chapter shall be used by the city for financing capital protects specified in the capital facilities plan element of the citv's comprehensive plan pursuant to chapter 82 46 RCW Capital protects may include those listed in RCW 35 43.040 B Special assessments not limited. This chapter shall not limit the existing authority of the city to impose special assessments in the manner prescribed by law on property benefited thereby. Sec. 3.19.030. Date payable, interest The taxes imposed by this chapter shall become due and payable immediately at the time of sale. If not paid within thirty (30) days thereafter, the amount unpaid shall be subject to interest and penalties pursuant to chapter 82.46 RCW and all other applicable laws shall be.._ interest at the ..,te of ene (1) « e..t per,maRth fie.., the tifne of sale „.,t,l the date eC..........ent Sec. 3.19.040. Seller's obligation. The taxes imposed in this chapter are the obligation of the seller and may be enforced through an action of debt against the seller or in the manner prescribed for the foreclosure of mortgages Resort to one (1) course of enforcement is not an election not to pursue the other. Sec. 3.19.050. Tax lien on real property. The taxes imposed in this chapter and any interest or penalties thereon shall constitute a specific lien upon each piece of 3 Amendment to Excise Tax on Real Estate Sales real property sold from the time of sale until the tax is paid, which lien may be enforced in the manner prescribed for the foreclosure of mortgages Sec. 3.19.060. King County collection — Administrative fee. The King County treasurer shall place one (1) percent of the proceeds of the taxes imposed by this chapter in the King County Current Expense Fund to defray costs of collection The remaining proceeds from the city taxes imposed by this chapter shall be remitted to the city on a monthly basis. Sec. 3.19.070. Same—County treasurer as agent. The taxes imposed by this chapter shall be paid to and collected by the King County treasurer The county treasurer shall act as agent for the city The county treasurer shall cause a stamp evidencing satisfaction of the lien to be affixed to the instrument of sale or conveyance prior to its recording, or to the real estate excise tax affidavit in the case of used mobile home sales A receipt issued by the county treasurer for the payment of the tax shall be evidence of the satisfaction of the lien imposed by KCC 3.19 050, and may be recorded in the manner prescribed for recording satisfactions of mortgages. No instrument of sale or conveyance evidencing a sale subject to the tax may be accepted by the King County auditor for filing or recording until the tax is paid and the stamp affixed thereto. If the tax is not due on the transfer, the instrument shall not be accepted until a suitable notation of this fact is made on the instrument by the county jtreasurer Sec. 3.19.080. Refunds. If, upon written application by a taxpayer to the King County treasurer for a refund, it appears a tax has been paid in excess of the amount actually due or upon a sale or other transfer declared to be exempt, such excess amount or improper payment shall be refunded by the county treasurer to the taxpayer. No refund shall be made unless the state has first authorized the refund of an excessive amount or an improper amount paid, unless such improper amount was paid as a result 4 Amendment to Excise Tax on Real Estate Sales of miscalculation Any refund made shall be withheld from the next monthly distribution to the city See. 3.19,090. State law and regulations adopted by reference. Chanter 82 45 RCW. chapter 82.46 RCW, chapter 458-61 WAC, and any and all subsequent amendments are hereby adopted by this reference as if set forth in full in this chapter The sivy lefk is hereby direeted to maintain e a (1) eepy e f f4.apte.. 82 46 RPAI ,. ouffently ..eted o as subsequently ended en file f r- .. e bhe and a -...tie.. SECTION 2. — Savin s The sections of existing Chapters 3 19 and 3 24 of the Kent City Code that are affected by this ordinance shall remain in full force and effect until the effective date of this ordinance SECTION 3. — Reveal Upon the effective date of this ordinance, Chapter 3 24 of the Kent City Code, entitled 'Real Estate Excise Tax", is hereby repealed in its entirety. SECTION 4. —Severabikty If any one or more section, subsections, or sentences of this Ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect SECTION 5. — Effective Date This ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty(30) days from and after passage, as provided by law JIM WHITE, MAYOR 5 Amendment to Excise Tax on Real Estate Sales ATTEST BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM- TOM BRUBAKER, INTERIM CITY ATTORNEY PASSED day of 2002. APPROVED day of 2002 PUBLISHED• day of 12002 I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the City of Kent as hereon indicated. (SEAL) BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK 6 Amendment to Excise Tax on Real Estate Sales ,�� 5�. "3�%I�' �� '� ,t t yj s i ,Wl'�,. _ $ I+�,{ fu � a�•��4 ffi � ` 4 IK we++,+CYl Meeti nr ,. I, FuSiUarV191 200 ent Calen SVB Cis s PUGET SOU S S{NIOR BMEBAL14 � � � �3ION - =a ACCEPT j414D BUDGET "Ary � ,ili II •'i'P�fi 2 . SUMNARY STAMENT9 �`As, a ecomnlended ' Director,°' � k` ' E� ; accept the w 700 . 00 domitign. from the Pag 6� for f Baseball League and am"df tthe Recreation.' nit Budget. ' d 4 kT 1 91 3 . EXHIST s None 4 . RECOM NDED BYs Staff d; P,arks Commit ` ! ` (CommitteQ, Staff, Rr ,n„xier, Ccrosmieaitsx�,�, 5. UNBXJDQETRD FISCAL/PER#$ Ilex : 1" 'i YES X 6. EXPR=TURE REQUIRE ): ftygnue. 4 700 .OQ 11P, SOURCE OF VMS : Pue f;A S r B e 71 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTIQN: Counci]member� es, Council �` a seconds-' DISCUSSION: 1 .�, ' .}js ACTION: k 'z jji, < it A.geI . hem No. 6P lit ;A ; t` Ilk ricil Meet3 ! ent Cal en ' 1. SLTF3JE EAST HILL, � � SPORTS ART #u full l ( 2 . SIR Y S3`A .4 a 4ecormiel by;, i V ""Director, rl approve the proposal by-A Kichele Van Slyly;, s ization to ' enter into an agreement; fiat art., work at � 1 ''ll Youth Sports Complex. „ , ° I Artwork for East 3ii11 uth Sports Oompl t� " 1re five-year 's City tart Plan for 2002 O-1 viously appr Xent Arts Commission and City Ccz pcil . The artl �*Ia need to relieve the, massive st c6are of the 120 wall and chain lints fence alongi,;494h Street. Thy if, 9 COMMis9iOn selected five artists, o,, were invited t i � posals Eoil the space, A jury of vp ;peol review Sala and selected the project QfI,' 1 fe-sire stainlo Ifigures and, !=p porcelain enamel balls t*t uts design�''I ,a , I Van Slyke flbl j the site. Her proposalaAaloo includes for foul park gates. The Kent', ,t to Commission a recomml„� tion of the jury to acq*pt !Michele Van S sal durino tl the January 22, 2002 M604�g• J 3 . E SR $: i None 4 . REC a. OMp�ENDLD BY: Staff, dv Arta C a# s Committ' d (Committee, Staff, fier, Commigsi6 , , 5. IIN mPO I8CA4 P IMPACTS r,l, aye u �lf YES i ' t 6. EBPENDIOrEE REQUIRED: I 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: ,1 Councilmember_,� secondp(j DISCUSSION; r r [1G Y1 q ¢�I ACTION: $,� �I� dk <� � I��K cil Agerud _ m �o. 6Q 0 '� ° i- i :, ,w=a% ; E ci1 Meetir ' fl `i';' ,� �x, �h 19, 2 ebj4ent Calefi z 1' 3RBEGTs KHERSON' PETER COCT�I �,� CBPT AND, AMEND E3U171'aE'. p 2. STdBMRY szatil NT: 4pv=cval t0 grant !�� � FF aBements ` ' ' through Kherson park tc9''S4#dra R. Schae:j aid the Parks s land Acquisition budgetl,�Iip {the amount of � �, as � F recommended by the P&rX0 Director and sU raval of i final terms and Condit q 'by the .City ', g,g { 7 1 ' 7 �� i�C 1� '•k 1 Sandra Schaefer is rev*stt3ng two ease ' fit Kherson Park; one is fora seco d, story ,stai to access- her building and the o6W =is for a 13 ' Sty and stairwell access eased t,�through the ' ,4 3 . 88E#;[SST8: Permit regtj s ,; detail of Xh and Scope 0 Easements 4 . R73C IQDBD, BY: Staff S 'barks Commit ii E a i ` Cos�nittee, Staff, 090,mt4er, Commisa *'11 ." a� S. UNBUDGMTED FISCAL/PERj$ IMPACT: '. � 'YES X -� ern i 6. WIN TI?bE8 $VIRED: J ii I� SODRN Or FONDS: 7. CITY COL�I ACTTC_1�iz Councilmember m¢ ves, cou4cil 41 secon000 F U. DISCUSSION: ACTION: •�y,r I, � Yt L cil Agenda .l •� � r r a ,I, I{ Easement for Stairwell 45 SQ FT (1 .5' X 30') X $17.00 X 50%= $382.50 Utility and Stairwell Access Easement 780 SQ FT (13' X 60') X $17.00 X 25%= $3,315.00 1 . Grantee shall be listed as Sandra K. Schaefer, 109 2nd AVENUE SOUTH, Kent WA 98031 2. Before beginning work on the project described in this agreement, the contractor or the easement grantee shall provide a Certificate of Insurance and a separate endorsement naming the City as Additional Insured. 3. Contractor will be responsible for the restoration of all disturbed areas and that area is subject to final acceptance by city staff. 4. Contractor or grantee shall immediately repair any utilities public or private, damaged to avoid disruption of service, during this project. 5. All disturbed grass areas are to be sod cut on both sides and replaced with new, cut sod. No grass seed will be accepted. • 6. City reserves the rights to connect to the sanitary sewer being installed at any place they choose, at any time in the future. 7. We require the contractor to complete project and restoration within 21 calendar days. Work will not be "deemed complete" until site has been inspected and City gives final acceptance. 8. If project and restoration are not completed with in 21 calendar days, City reserves the right to hire an independent contractor or use force account, to complete the work and be reimbursed by the grantee 9. Easement grantee or contractor responsible for any locates permits and or fee's that may be required. Action #1 . Approve the StaVFVell Easement to Kherson Park, and accept the $382.50 from Sandra Schaefer, amending the Parks Land Acquisition Budget. Action #2: Approve the Utility and Stairwell Access Easement to Kherson Park, and accept the $3,315.00 from Sandra Schaefer, amending the Parks Land Acquisition Budget. Kent Parks and Recreation,Parks Planning and Development • Jan 31, 2002 Halfon Const. 15956 205th S E. Renton, WA 98059 City of Kent Lori Flemm Superzntenden*- of Parks Planning 220 Fourth &,je S Kent, WA. 98032 We are doing a major renovation to the existing building at 109 Second Ave. S, in Kent To accomplish this renovation we need to lower the existing side sewer that is serving the building Records of exactly where this sewer is located are non-exist,ng, though the city engineering dept. has been helpful with drawings of the city sewer. There is a stub located on Gowe Street south of our project for our use To reach this city sewer we need to have an easement across Kent Kherson Park.. The easement we are requesting would be 20 ft wide. It would be a one time use (disruption) of the park, only at the time of installtion. The park would then be restored the existing condition A second floor exit stairway is required by City of Kent Building & Fire Depts This stairway encroaches approx six inchs into Kherson Park right behind (west) of our building. This easement would also solve the encroachment problem We resectfully request the City of Kent grant this easement as decribed in the attached legal decription. The boundary survey the city requested has been ordered. Con5turction Manager Halfon Cons Tom Brown --3 -enclosures - - - -- --, --- — - ---- ---' - - - --- y 5 qo I� s Tr D J y � Ave I �� Z !E y� k _ nt Sf i lllkF i i 41 1111 h ] r r ' cif Meeti �' ;•�; b ry 19, 2M61 I at CalendAt # IT � a 1. StTBd7EC!Ts OFF LEASH, 1JQG1, PARK ISSUE PAP 4A T t k ,r 2. SUM9M S�"A ,EMENT: �$�c pt the Issue , drove the', ; � City of Kent as a partri Von the South , '� - Off-Leash �s ' Task Force to site, p1mu, ,land prepare cis for a ? S� +� regional urban off-leip,414 aiea for dogs.. , , County Task :F ` Force has prepared an _;Aso Paper ba'set -chi ` ` h of existing; off-leash dog parks and jt4a availability# k land for aO, '!i off-leash park. ! ' 4,rI�y 'Yt rvl. I£ j ILI ,s 5. EXHIBITS: Issue paper;',Jdatied 2/5/02 _RECONDBD BY: Staff' amd,,Parks Commits ' (Committee, Staff, ner, Commissi ,;' 5. 'M? TEA FISCAL/P Ir IN "L': i„ �99R'13 ,�'i 3tES . ' 6 . EXPEMITMO. &,EQIIIRED e , ;'I i ;,{'.a 14. + SOURCE OF ,F= 'F 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: k� ', Councilmember � hngvjes, Counoil a 1'"I seconaw : I r- DISCUSSION: 4 ACTION: I^ 'I IF im 41r _ a' cil Agenda! � ,1 �• I � iii ' � '� tsm No. 6S ' F I � iI yyF { i`_43i9 .Lys E 3 Y ISSUE PAPER: Recommendation to City and County Councils South King County Task Force on Off-Leash Area (OLA) February 5, 2002 Recommendation: The South King County Task Force Recommends ■ Locate two regional off-leash areas (OLA) in south King County One to serve the entire south county population and another one to serve the 1-5 corridor/urban population ■ A portion of Grandview Park has been Identified as a potential off-leash site to serve the urban population. Grandview Park is located between Sea Tac, Kent, and Des Moines, just east of 1-5 and Military Road. ■ Conduct a public open house to obtain citizen input on potential sites and feasibility ■ Member cities and King County contribute one-time capital development funds, along with submittal of a joint Interagency Committee for Outdoor Recreation (IAC) grant application, for construction of the OLA. ■ Initiate a $1-2 surcharge on King County pet licenses as a potential source of funds for operation and maintenance. ■ The OLA land owner/agency shall contract with an outside organization for operation, maintenance, and management. Background: In January of 2001 , several south county cities, in partnership with the King County Parks Department formed a task force in response to public demand for an off-leash site in south King County. Many of the cities have had requests from citizens at the local level, and King County has had requests for a south regional OLA. Cities represented on the Task Force include Auburn, Buren, Des Moines, Federal Way, Kent, Renton, Tukwila, and Sea Tac. King County Parks staff and King County Animal Control staff also served on the Task Force. ' The Task Force discussed the need and level of public interest for off-leash areas in their respective community, criteria for site selection and development, funding options, management concerns, and the future of off-leash planning The Task Force members investigated potential sites, compatibility with existing uses, and funding sources. Lon 1 of 9 02/05/02 OLA Issue Paper Many dog owners in the south county region are driving to Marymoor Park to use the off-leash facility. Marymoor Park receives an estimated 500,000 visits per year. None of the member Task Force cities has a designated off-leash area in their communities. Many of the cities have reported conflicts between dogs off-leash and other park users. Existing Off-leash Areas: King County Parks currently operates two off-leash areas (OLA). ■ Marymoor Park (a 40-acre OLA and 642 total park acres) in the north region which serves a population of 500,000 annual OLA visitors * and 750,000 dogs. SODA (Serve Our Dog Area) is a non-profit organization that provides financial and volunteer assistance at the Marymoor Park OLA for development, management, and enforcement. ■ Luther Burbank Park (a less than one acre OLA and 77 total park acres) in the central region which serves a population of 25,000 annual visits* and 40,000 dogs. The City of Seattle operates eight (8) areas ranging from 1 to 9-acres within city parks, resulting from a successful pilot program of seven sites put into effect in 1996. These OLAs serve 563,374 people in Seattle and 25,834** licensed dogs. Sand Point Magnuson Park is the largest OLA at nine acres OLAs are located in Genesee Park, Golden Gardens Park, Woodland Park, Westcrest Park, and Blue Dog Pond. New pilot sites have recently opened at Northacres Park and Jose Rizal Park. There are 151,000 licensed pets*** (cats and dogs) in King County (not including Seattle) of which an estimated 90,000 are dogs, with 50% estimated to be in the southern region (south of 1-90). Existing OLAs in the metropolitan area offer a wealth of information. There are other cities in the United States that operate successful parks from which to draw management and development practices. 'Visitor counts are estimates based on staff monitoring of parking lots "Number of licensed dogs on January 28, 2002 ***Figures based on year 2001 actual licenses Lori 2 of 9 02/05/02 OLA Issue Paper g Task Force Activities: 1. Regional Site Selection Each city conducted a site investigation and suitability study within their jurisdiction searching for sites of sufficient size (25 — 40 acres), publicly owned, with convenient access, so that a significant capital land acquisition cost would not be necessary. The Task Force felt that land acquisition costs would push the project so far into the future, that the first focus should be on publicly owned lands by cities, the county, utility district, port district, state, or federal agencies. If no publicly owned lands were found to be suitable, a search for undeveloped land, or land donors would be initiated The Task Force felt it was critical to select a site where the off-leash area is not an interim use, so that the users would not be displaced at some point in the future. The site search revealed that no Task Force member City has 40 acres available for a regional site, nor should any city be responsible to serve the south county region King County is reviewing potential sites in the south region and will be conducting a feasibility study (will be attached as a future appendix to this issue paper when complete) on each potential site. Many of the undeveloped county-owned sites possess sensitive areas that may prove to be incompatible with an OLA, while undergoing environmental review. This project will require the participation of cities served by the off-leash site, and King County. Development of the park will require initial capital investment from the cities and county. The annual operating costs of the park will be shared by the cities and county, and the users. An equitable process will be developed to determine those cost shares. 2. Local Sites Local Task Force agencies have indicated a desire to locate a local off-leash site to serve the citizens in their community. The inten, is a local OLA would serve daily needs (time at park: 20 minutes) and the regional OLA becomes a destination recreation experience (time at park: two hours). The concern is timing. If a city were to open a Lori 3 of 9 02/05/02 OLA Issue Paper C local site prior to the regional site, the local site would be Inundated with dogs from other communities. Past experience has shown that some communities around the country have closed sites due to overuse from destination users. The Task Force members want to ensure the success of local OLA by either opening both the local and regional simultaneously, or after the opening of the regional park. 3. Site Selection Criteria When siting the regional off-leash area, vehicle access, permitting Issues, drive time, and distance from the south county urban centers must be a major consideration. A Feasibility Study for any potential site needs to address access The Task Force suggests that an off-leash area should have the necessary transportation infrastructures in place in order to be successful if the south regional off-leash area is located in a rural area. If the development of an OLA triggers road Improvements, funding may not be available to develop the park for several years due to the major cost. In order to be a viable site for the cities to participate in, the drive time and transportation network to the south regional OLA needs to show a nexus to the site. If the site were in rural King County, and not closer or easier to access than Marymoor Park or Luther Burbank Park, many south county citizens will choose to use the two existing OLAs. Based on data from Marymoor Park, economic Impacts to communities for food and other services are positive Consideration should be given to the availability of services when siting the regional OLA. 4. Potential Partnerships ■ Due to cost of development and operation (see Exhibit 1), King County needs active participation with local cities to construct and operate the park. Task Force members believe this is an opportunity to create a partnership since this OLA will serve the needs of municipal residents as well as unincorporated King County residents. Although no other city located in the north region supports the Marymoor Off-leash Park, as well as the central region the Luther Burbank OLA, Task Force cities could project use by their citizens at the regional OLA, and approach decision-makers to commit funds for initial capital improvements and for operation and maintenance, subject to council approval. Lori 4 of 9 02/05/02 OLA Issue Paper ■ King County Animal Control provides service in all Task Force cities. A dog license surcharge is a candidate for a dependable funding source for operation and maintenance, and a potential source for development funds. In King County, 151,000 pet licenses were sold in 2001 and of these, 50% are in South King County. Task force members who own pets felt that they and other pet owners would be willing to pay an annual surcharge for off-leash areas. The amount of the annual surcharge needed would be determined after completion of cost analysis A $1.00 surcharge will generate $151,000 countywide. The surcharge should be split equitably among the regional OLAs. Options to consider regarding this surcharge- A) a voluntary pilot program to measure the willingness of pet owners to pay; B) the surcharge could be an on-going, permanent portion of an overall pet license fee increase in a proposal effective in the 2003 budget. • The last pet license fee increase was 1997. Fees for altered pets are currently $15.00 and unaltered pets are $55 00 King County Animal Control is considering a fee increase of $1 - 5 for the 2003 budget proposal. The task force opinion is that a surcharge, included as part of the fee increase, would be supported by pet owners, since it would provide for an area to exercise their pets. ■ King County Department of Natural Resources and Parks may provide land for the regional OLA, and will manage the OLA in partnership, unless it is located within a municipality. An option for managing the OLA could be in the form of a concession agreement with a municipality, county, or a contractor. ■ SODA (Serve Our Dog Area) Is a non-profit organization that, as a primary user of the OLA, is critical to the sites success. A private/public partnership for design, development, management, and enforcement may be sought by the Task Force cities. 5. Potential Sponsors/Revenue Sources ■ Dog food corporate sponsorship for construction and/or maintenance ■ Local veterinarians as possible sponsors for construction and/or maintenance • Obedience classes offered on site, with a program fee 40 ■ Vendor (such as dog biscuit sales at Marymoor Park) revenue sharing ■ Rent the facility for dog shows Lori 5 of 9 02/05/02 OLA Issue Paper 6. Management Issues ■ Animal control: Locate in an area of the park that is compatible with other adjacent park uses, and separate other uses with fencing. ■ Sediment control due to ESA permit requirements must be addressed ■ Animal waste management needs to be addressed; a "pack it in/pack it out' philosophy is not user friendly Appropriate vessel allows for waste disposal and subsequent treatment (toilets) • King County Animal Control reports that dog bites to humans are not an identified problem at existing OLAs, which could be due to a lack of reporting. ■ A South region SODA (Serve Our Dog Area) chapter is critical to the long-term success of the OLA. 7. OLA Park Amenities Minimal Amenities: ■ Large, flat, open expanse of grass ■ Variety of landscape areas/types ■ Poop dispensers, Dumpster, portable toilets, or Septic system for waste disposal ■ Dog toilets — poles and gravel ■ Restrooms (portable toilets) ■ 10-40 acres ■ Fencing ■ Signs, rules, location map ■ Ample parking ■ Drinking water • Hog fuel surface (if surface area is minimal) to reduce sediment from turf erosion Desirable Amenities: ■ Benches ■ Water access • Trails ■ Lighting Lori 6 of 9 02/05/02 OLA Issue Paper • Bathing station, with ramp and big tub (possible vendor opportunity) ■ Exercise "equipment" for dogs ■ Dog shows may require additional amenities — substantial power source for grooming, quality turf for ESPN level shows, receptacles, picnic tables, picnic shelter, portable fencing, ample parking, convenient to overnight camping facilities 8. Next Steps ■ The Task Force member cities will present this issue paper to its elected officials to determine their willingness to participate in a regional OLA and at what level of financial commitment. At this stage due to unknowns of the site and the costs, a resolution in support of a partnership/Task Force is recommended ■ Contingent upon local approval, the task force will remain active for the regional off- leash area development Planning for local parks will be relegated to cities ■ A public input process for site feasibility and desion will be coordinated among the Task Force members. • King County will complete the draft feasibility study on potential sites. ■ Before proceeding with site selection and development, Task Force member Cities should commit to the OLA with an inter-local agreement. ■ Develop a business plan with a budget based on the Marymoor Park Report (expected in 2003) to construct, operate and maintain a regional OLA. ■ Cost analysis by the Task Force to determine development, maintenance and operating expenses, and projected revenue will lead to identification of the financial share/contribution for each participating city ■ Collectively locate, design, build and operate a regional urban OLA Tentative Schedule Cities and King County representatives on the Task Force will present this issue paper to respective decision making bodies in the first quarter of 2002. A public workshop will be held during the second quarter, with a grant application submittal. Feasibility study, business plan, and cost estimates will commence in the third and fourth quarters, 2002. If consensus on a site is reached, the development schedule is dependent on the extent of existing infrastructure, development costs, and available funds. For example if an Lon 7 of 9 02IM02 OLA Issue Paper I ' existing park, such as Grandview Park where dogs off-leash could be compatible with soccer and other park usage, is selected, then opening a regional OLA could be fairly quick and cost effective. In 2003, an OLA could be open for use which would include minimal facilities such as portable toilets, signs, clearing, pathways, and fencing. Working with the users, final development plans could be prepared and permits applied for spring, 2004 construction. i Lon S of 9 02/05/02 OLA Issue Paper 1� EXHIBIT ONE --Preliminary-- MARYMOOR PARK DOG OFF-LEASH AREA AREA: 40 Acres Annual Maintenance and Operating Costs (Year 2000) Labor 413 hours for maintenance/cleanup 50 hours miscellaneous repair work $11,991.42 Average Cost Suoolies $ 1,200.00 55 gallon Garbage Bags $13,912.63 Waste Management (Rental & Dumping Fees) N/A Donated Supplies by SODA $15,112.63 NOTE. King County is preparing an annual report on the Marymoor Park OLA. The report will address costs for maintenance of the associated parking, public restrooms, overhead, etc., used by OLA visitors. Lon 9 of 9 02/05/02 OLA Issue Paper �G Shoreline - Bothell , 4L 4. Duvall '. Redmond •�fi• Ma oor Pa q .a • � . Carnation • "� Seattle Bellevue • e � • V ,..• Sammamish n Luther Burbank Par p j o 0 ` . v • Snoqualmie �••�� +. •• ..,.•....••• • ••�.• • ' •••• � Issaquah ' .• ' ,`: '••F� Renton • '•• Bert' Vashon Bunen ; ; ••� :� '. ELF Island '• •� �✓✓ • • Tukwila •• .•••, ~. ' • w1 •,..•• . . ... •, Grandview Par - Kent ' ° ; Maple a 6 •• Valley �• i Q "• ' Federal Way • Diamond a � Auburn � ••„• , • Enumclaw � •••' : •• ° q x King County Park System O i Potential Off-Leash Sites IQng County Park System October 16, 2001 Geographic Information System •'.•• Maintenance Dlstncts Ong County.wasnvy�on 5 0 5 10 Miles King County Park System rr�warr�gpgecu�snpyeesm�wor.'w�811� n ,. 1 i i1 Meet ary' 19, 2 'other Busi.n 1. 3LT t 2002 BUDGE j, APJUSTMWS 2 . 8 Y STATSNFM s�, E t, their Febr Ming, tha' a Operations Committee r dMInended apprrs 002 Budget { Change ordinance. Thejpdjiistmsnts pr#0a penditure reduction that restore; the Gein;�ra1 fiance `}} (reserve) to 10% and 'p( pvldes other to ments. .,l Mike Martin, Chief Admihigrrativse' offs ide a brief i+ presentation. 3. 8 I$TTB: Memo and i t� . ,r-. �s - ' r RBoD4EUYsOperat =i3 Comm .tt a ,r j= (,Committee, Staff, er Comm so 5 . M%,UMTER FISCAL/PZ T 1 ; ' # ' - YE6p IN119 ; 6. Ep NJ31TURERBQUIRND sI ' SOURCE a `'' ,i ! 7 . CITY C UWIL ACTIQNaIN Councilmembor 1110 es, Council %econdls" j to ads#pt Ord: nance No. for the 2i ustments a a , shown in Exhibits A and R1'F !�E A�, DISCUSSION: [` ACTION:' Agend'' '�I �i++ '• _ Item No. 7A Al Mike Martin • Chief Administrative Officer KENT Phone 253-856-5710 WASHINGTON Fax 253-856-6700 DATE February 6, 2002 TO Mayor White and Councilmembers FROM. Mike Martin / SUBJECT 2002 Budget Adjustments -Ordinance The attached 2002 Budget Change Ordinance provided in Exhibits A and B cover two areas. one is for expenditure Budget Cuts that restore the General Fund's Fund Balance (reserve) to 10%, and a second piece that covers technical adjustments The first piece covering the budget cuts shows the net reduction of$1,407,640 with a net General Fund reduction of$1,355,461 This restores the General Fund's Fund Balance to 10% and includes no layoffs This budget cut is similar to cuts the private business sector has had to make to "tighten the belt" and operate within existing revenue The revenue shortfall occurred due to the following 1 Economic slowdown made worse by the September 11 terrorism attacks, 2 Passage of Initiative 747 which limits property taxes to a 1% increase; 3 Not utilizing the $1 2 million banked property tax available As a proactive and more permanent solution to the revenue shortfalls, each department thoroughly and thoughtfully reviewed their own budget to come forward with cuts that would cover the shortfall The cuts are across the board, are not without consequences, and will have some effect on the level of service They include deletion of 4 55 positions and other salary and benefit reductions which will save $517,442 Included are 1 Elimination of some vacant positions, 2 Reducing some positions from Full Time to Regular Part Time or to a lower level position, 3 Reductions in overtime Also included in the cuts are reductions of other expenditures totaling $838,018 which includes elimination of some professional services, legal services, supplies, travel and training, and, the deferral of purchases of uniforms, safety equipment and maintenance, and capital items and tools 2002 Budget Adjustments Page 2 The Mayor and I believe this is a prudent responsive action that needs to be taken at this time Departments will do their best to meet their highest priorities but their flexibility to add projects and maintain the same turn-around time may be affected I applaud the departments for their responsiveness to our economic condition and have pledged to them my efforts to restore critical positions and services if possible. The second portion of the 2002 Budget Adjustments is for technical adjustments which are already anticipated in the cuts, have their own revenue, or are a reclassification of expenditures This includes the addition of two FTE positions 1 Add $200,000 to cover future contract settlements which have been anticipated in the budget cuts above 2 Add court fines and forfeiture revenue in the amount of$40,665 to restore one Full Time Court Clerk position beginning April 1, 2002 for$36,968 3 Change the already budgeted professional services amount of$95,000 in the CIP fund to salaries and benefits for a FTE Project Manager. This position will manage the Kent Station Project and other future major capital projects such as overseeing the building of the maintenance facility in 2003 The Operations Committee approved the 2002 Budget Adjustment Ordinance at their February 5 meeting COUNCIL ACTION Adopt a 2002 Budget Adjustment Ordinance as shown in Exhibit A and detailed in Exhibit B 2002 Budget Adjustments Page 2 The Mayor and I believe this is a prudent responsive action that needs to be taken at this time Departments will do their best to meet their highest priorities but their flexibility to add projects and maintain the same turn-around time may be affected I applaud the departments for their responsiveness to our economic condition and have pledged to them my efforts to restore critical positions and services if possible The second portion of the 2002 Budget Adjustments is for technical adjustments which are already anticipated in the cuts, have their own revenue, or are a reclassification of expenditures This includes the addition of two FTE positions 1 Add $200,000 to cover future contract settlements which have been anticipated in the budget cuts above 2 Add court fines and forfeiture revenue in the amount of$40,665 to restore one Full Time Court Clerk position beginning April 1, 2002 for$36,968 3 Change the already budgeted professional services amount of$95,000 in the CIP fund to salaries and benefits for a FTE Project Manager This position will manage the Kent Station Project and other future major capital projects such as overseeing the building of the maintenance facility in 2003 The Operations Committee approved the 2002 Budget Adjustment Ordinance at their February 5 meeting COUNCIL ACTION Adopt a 2002 Budget Adjustment Ordinance as shown in Exhibit A and detailed in Exhibit B V (ozr Ors 000) a) D1 OM ( to C Q M r NM `I,- Or Q m m Q O r N Qr � M M O MGDr NM co y t06 Q Ld vN mvLd Mr OQ Q .N.. ....N v N .... I 0 N „M Q Om (O 'It O (O O (0 r 0 0) M Q) (O m 0 , Q M m to r IT O F m N O (0 M r m m r a 0 r Q O V Q m O-+ V N1` OQ Ili rm OS Of IOir LL) N r 2U r M M M r M Q m Q N r (0 (O O d co co cn� M v E y m O O N LO Ed W .N.. Q... O r 0 m QQ O (O Mr O Q r m 0 M V �U oMMm { rnrmmQ � NmMr m m mmNQ r � rrrQm .- cor ks y v (o (oWof w dofvL cc o CO NNNr (OQmm Nor Q co M r M a M U M Q1 m m Q Q m m M 01 M O m u] M m W C r M O ID 10 ODD v m ru�00 O O � M v� cnrrnocoo cam '(3 (p r r N M 1- tO rO mQ m (O M 17 Q Q m M t0 (0 m u (p r Q N (0 N N N N 0) LO (D N " r MN N N O m —0 N O Nrr 1- M L QMr 17NM 07 0 0Q0 0 m r CD mQQ 0 (D00 0) L m M m Q m Q O m m D) m M (L m Q M N (0 m m N m M O X r- M (3 Q r Q M Q (6 m 0) Q w 10 m (O m , , N r M 0) (O O m M m l0 �+ M N 17 N N 0 � Cm M Q M N m (0 m M r O CO 10 M V) 0 C O r r N 10 O O 10 r CO m m O CO M t0 Q .y N M m r 10 N Q 01 (O m C V- M m " �y L M N r CO O CO Q M 10 (O CO Q m LO m to CDN IT P., N 0 (0 N N (O m N 01 N Q @ Nw Mr r LO � M � N O 01 to m 0) M � 17 M a � (OO 1NM r r �0 � r N U O y °1rn O E o N d oa c CL o U O L ud U O Co 0 c y O� C lL O Z 0 m L 5 m E a¢ m F EFY rov E �' S 30o m `mt m ° o UawUlLUaaLLaa0m5 (L C7LL ¢ m N mmmmmmmmmmmmmgm m L m m aai o o o o o 0 0 6 0 6 0 0 `o o 0 0 0 F- F- F- F- F- F- F- F- F- F- F- H F- F- N F- O H E_ IL rn Y 2002 Summary of Proposed Budget Reductions #of Salaries + Total Total Positions Benefits Expenditures Program Division City Council 000 0 4,854 4,854 Mayors Office/Admin 000 0 49,771 49.771 Employee Services 000 0 37,000 37,000 Legal 000 17,596 13,000 30,596 Finance (0 30) 26,603 7,732 34,335 Finance-CIP 000 (7,139) 0 (7,139) Other 000 0 29,713 29,713 General Government (0,30) 37,060 142,070 179,130 Police (2 00) 200,856 54,000 254,856 Police CIP 0,00 0 81,000 81,000 Fire 0.00 66,714 280,947 347,661 Municipal Court 000 0 22,500 22,500 Public Safety (2 00) 267,570 438,447 706,017 Community Development 000 27,241 44,553 71,794 Public Works (1 00) 88,702 0 88,702 Public Works/Community Dev (1 00) 115,943 44,553 160,496 Parks, Rec&Community Svcs (0 25) 50,100 91,241 141,341 141,341 Human Services -General Fund 000 6,650 850 7,500 7,500 TOTAL GENERAL FUND (3.55) 477,323 717,161 1,194,484 1,194,484 Information Technology (1 00) 54,969 69,000 123,969 Fleet Services 000 0 24,187 24,187 Facilities 000 0 65,000 65,000 Internal Service Fund (1 00) 54,969 158,187 213,156 TOTAL OTHER FUNDS (1.00) 54,969 168,187 213,156 213,156 TOTAL ALL FUNDS (4.55) 532,292 875,348 1,407,640 1,407,640 TOTAL GENERAL FUND IMPACT (3.55) 517,442 838,018 1,355,461 1,355,461 4 2002 Proposed Budget Cuts #of Salaries+ Total Total Positions Benefits Expenditures Program Division GENERAL GOVERNMENT City Council Council Supplies-central services 500 Council Professional Services 1,100 Council Subsistence 3 254 Total City Council 4,854 Mayor's Of iicalAdmin Admire Supplies-central services 981 Admin Professional Services 5,500 Admin Postage-central services 630 Admin Phone-central services 395 Mayor Subsistence 2,500 Civic Affiliations Dues-We China Relations 412 Public Info Professional Services 3,136 Public Info Phone-central services 160 Public Info Cable Media 1,305 Public Info TravellMileage 1,075 Public Info Subsistence 1,000 Public Info Training 517 City Clerk Professional Services 7,160 Economic Dev Professional Services 25 000 Total Mayor's Office 49,771 Employee Services Admire Emp Onentation Enhancements 10,000 Admen Employee Orientation Supplies 10,000 Admen Flex Enroll Mtc Services 8,000 Admen Staff Retreat 2,000 Recruitment Job Fairs 7,000 Total Employee Services 37,000 Legal Admen Professional Services 1,000 Civil Legal Services 6,000 Prosecution Intems 17,596 Prosecution Legal Services 1,000 Prosecution Professional Services 5 000 Total Legal 30,596 Finance Financial Ping Reduce Performance Meet Analyst (0 30) 8,059 Financial Ptng Increase Revenue Analyst 020 Financial Ping Temp Reduce Cap Pp Analyst (0 20) 5,093 Financial Ping Allocate 1 Plan Msr Anlyst to CIP 7,139 Cust Svs Eliminate tools,minor eglfum 1,000 Cust Svs Travel and Mileage 1,236 Cust sys Subsistence 1,906 Cust Svs Training/Education 1,442 Cust Svs Reduce Advertising 1,648 Accounting Reduce elected med premiums 6,312 Admen Reduce Software 500 Total Finance 34,335 Capital Improvement Fund Finance CIP Allocate 1 Pfrm Mar Anlyst to CIP (7,139) (7,139) Other Financial Reduce Contingency 29,713 29,713 TOTAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT (0 30) 37,060 142,070 179,130 i xa %tA2=8ud9whF ,;o iW&"9Cw xW 12W= 5 2002 Proposed Budget Cuts #of Salaries+ Total Total Positions Benefits Expenditures Program Division S PUBLIC SAFETY Police Patrol Eliminate W Patrol vacancies (2 00) 160,856 Patrol 20fc/3mo savben to Marine Patrol 40,000 Corrections Program Supplies 20,000 K-9 Uniforms 1,000 K-9 Small Tools 1,00000 1,0 K-9 Subsistence 1.0 K-9 Tuitition Patrol SRT Small Tools 1 500 00 Patrol SRT Professional Services 1, 00 Patrol SRT Subsistence ,000 Patrol Uniforms 1 1,000 Patrol Small Tools 5,000 Records Communications Repair f0,500 Total Police 254.856 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND Police CIP Tfr in Enhanced 911 Prol funds 45,000 Police CIP Tfr in Defibulator Project funds 36 000 Total Police CIP Fund (2 00) 81,000 Fire Admin Office Supplies 3, Admin Annual Annual Physicals 11,640 Admin Travel Admin Subsistance 1,000 Admin Job Fairs 1,000 Facilities Maintenance&Const Supplies 2,750 Communications Tools/Minor Equipment 1,000 Communications Radio/Paging/MDCs to I T 1,000 Training Office Supplies 20,000 Training Office Supplies-central stores 5,000 Training Medical Safety Supplies 1,000 Training Maintenance&Const Supplies 3,000 Training Tools/Minor Equipment Soo Training Other Professional Services 1,000 Training Travel 5,000 Training Subsistence 2,000 Training Registration 1,545 Training Mte of Other Equipment 7,982 Suppression Eliminate vacant Asst Fire Chief 3,000 Suppression Add Back Firefi liter (1 00) 111,588 Su g 1 00 (63,124) Suppression Uniforms Suppression MedicaUChemical Supplies 82000 Suppression Maintenance&Canal Supplies 2,500 Suppression Lubes Suppression Fire Hose 1,000 Suppression Professional Services 20,000 Suppression Subsistence 2,500 Suppression Outside Repair 57,715 Suppression Outside Maintenance 1,815 EMS Office Supplies 2,500 EMS Med/Chem-Disposable Supplies 500 EMS Tools/Minor Eq Non-Disposables 18,000 EMS Eguipment/Mamtenance 2,500 Prevention Stand-by Pay 2,000 Prevention Office Supplies 18,250 Prevention Uniforms 5,000 Prevention Dues 1,000 Prevention Travel 500 Prevention Subsistence 2,334 Prevention Registration 2•333 Total Fire 000 2,333 347,661 KS v`rY SuNpMrcpeWEaudgit CNa V.iW = 6 2002 Proposed Budget Cuts #of $alarms+ Total Total Positions Benefits Expenditures Program Division Municipal Court Probation Office Supplies-central services 500 Court Office Supplies-central services 1,500 Court Legal Messenger Services 1,000 Court ProTem Costs 4,000 Court Wtness Fees 4,000 Court Juror Fees 7,500 Court Interpreter Costs 4,000 Total Municipal Court 000 22,500 TOTAL PUBLIC SAFETY (2 00) 267,570 438,447 706,017 PUBLIC WORKSICOMMUNtTY DEVELOPMENT Community Development Ping Admin Office Supplies 100 Ping Admin Office Supplies-central services 500 Ping Admin Professional Services 1,000 Ping Admin Dues&Membership 300 Ping Admin Travel&Mileage 200 Ping Admin Subsistence 1,000 Ping Comm/Bds Office Supplies 137 Ping Comm/Bds Professional Services 251 Ping Comm/Bds Dues&Membership 21 Ping Comm/Bds Training/Education 352 Hearing Ezmnr Advertising 4,000 Ping Services Office Supplies 4,500 Ping Services Office Supplies-central services 4,000 Ping Services Professional Services 9,418 Ping Services Dues&Membership 500 Building Svcs Overtime-Salanes 21,741 Building Svcs Office Supplies 8,624 Building Svcs Office Supplies-central services 1,500 Building Svcs UniformlClothing 1,400 Building Svcs Tools,Minor Eq/Fum 1,500 Building Svcs Professional Services 2,500 Permit Center Overtime-Salaries 5,500 Permit Center Office Supplies 1,600 Permit Center Advertising 1,000 Permit Center Eq Rental-Interfund 150 Total Communrly Development 71,794 Public Works Property Mgmt Eliminate Property Analyst (1 00) 66,702 Street Eliminate 4-mo TPT Sal&Ben 15,036 Street Reduce Overtime 6,964 Total Public Works 88,702 TOTAL PUBLIC WORKSICOMM OEV (1 00) 115,943 44,553 160,496 KS V120=&AV6ftPfgawd awdo*Ca XW frlti= 7 2002 Proposed Budget Cuts #of Salaries+ Total Total Positions Benefits Expenditures Program Division PARKS,REC AND COMMUNITY SERVICES Parks and Recreation Rec/Cultural Eliminate Teen Sight Program 9,491 RecJCultural Transfer 35%Youth Coord 22,050 Rec(Cultural Eliminate Seattle Symphony 22,500 RerlCultural Elan Rsc Mgrifill w/75 Prg Coord (0 25) 18.250 RecJCuttural Reduce per capita pop-City Ail Plan 12,400 Maintenance Reduce Overtime 9,000 Maintenance Close V2 of Greenhouse 21000 Maintenance Reduce Sweeping of Prkg Lots 2.000 Maintenance Eliminate Groundskeeper Img 1,000 Maintenance Reduce Mtc Mgmt School to 1 1,400 Maintenance Reduction of electricity-16% 10,000 Maintenance Reduction in watenng parks-8% 7,000 Maintenance Reduction in sewer-30% 8,500 Maintenance Annex reduction in garbage contrct 8,000 Ping/Dev Salaries(undistributed) 800 PlrVOev Office Supplies 500 Ping/Dev Construction Supplies 300 Ping/Dev Tool Replacement 500 Ping/Dev Software Supplies 500 Ping/Dev ArchdecVEngineenng Services 550 Ping/Dev Professional Services 2,000 Ping/Dev Advertising 500 Admen Training 2000 TOTAL PARKS,REC&COMMUNITY SVCS (0 25) 50,100 91,241 141,341 141,341 HUMAN SERVICES Human Svcs Harrison House Cost of Living 850 Human Svcs Offset admen staff S from Auburn 5 650 TOTAL HUMAN SERVICES 000 6.650 850 7,500 7,500 TOTAL GENERAL FUND (3.55) 477,323 717,161 1,194,494 1,194,484 INTERNAL SERVICE FUND Information Technology Data Processing Eiim Computer Support Specialist (1 00) 54,969 Data Processing JOE Annual Mtc(50%) 44,000 Telecomm Reduction in telephone costs 25 000 Total Information Technology (1 00) 54,969 69,000 123,969 Total I.T.General Fund Impact 79,931 Fleet Services Fuel 24,187 Total Fleet Services 000 0 24,187 24,187 Total Fleet General Fund Impact 16,447 i 1r5 VQaa29.ft N ro=W 5v490 CWa.ala 1r"= 8 2002 Proposed Budget Cuts #of Salaries+ Total Total Positions Benefits Expenditures Program Division Is Facilities Reduce First Aid Supplies 1,500 Reduce ArchitecUEngmeenng 1.500 Reduce Outside Contractor work 8.000 Reduce Outside Rental Equipment 5,000 Reduce Warehouse Space Lease 5.000 Reduce Electrical 29,000 Reduce Internal PA Sys Repairs 15 000 Total Facilities 000 0 65,000 55,000 Total Facilities General Fund Impact $7,460 TOTAL INTERNAL SERVICE FUND (1 00) 54,969 158,187 213,156 TOTAL OTHER FUNDS (1.00) 64,969 158,187 213,156 TOTALALLFUNDS (4.55) 532,292 875,348 1,407,640 TOTAL GENERAL FUND IMPACT (3.55) 517,442 838,018 1,355,461 KS V==8ud9WPMP*nd BudgM Culs.W lr== 9 2002 Budget Adjustment Ordinance Exhibit A Inc(Dec) Beginning Ending in Fund Fund Fund Revenues Expenditures Balance Balance Balance GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS GENERALFUND 62,130,107 63,641,369 (1,511,262) 7,875,399 6,364,137 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS Street 4,993,734 4,930,974 62,760 637,447 700,207 Lodging Tax Fund 108,774 145,000 (36,226) 43,592 7,366 Youth/Teen Programs 744,162 790,886 (46,724) 243,918 197,194 Capital Improvement 8,625,088 10,576,807 (1,951,719) 2,615.739 664,020 Criminal Justice 2,307,865 2,711,942 (404,077) 1,258,171 854,094 Environmental Mitigation 185,006 147.729 37,277 262,734 300,011 Community Block Grant 615,671 615,671 Other Operating Projects 601,376 601,376 DEBT SERVICE FUNDS Voted 1,790,000 1,786,503 3,497 57,028 60,525 Counalmanic 7,297,236 7,297.236 Special Assessment 2,625,089 2,819.169 (194.080) 3,222,952 3,028.872 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS Street Projects 7,526,000 7,526,000 Parks Projects 5,263,640 5,263,640 Other Projects 3,140,000 3,140,000 PROPRIETARY FUNDS ENTERPRISE FUNDS Water 8.838,764 9.589,921 (751,157) 3,207,184 2,456,027 Sewerage 24,120.958 24,030.931 90,027 1,345,057 1,435,084 Golf Complex 3,334,500 2,995,668 338,832 (87,062) 251,770 INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS Equipment Rental 2,633,346 2,745,415 (112,069) 3,238,198 3.126,129 Central Services 7,249,243 7,263,641 (14,398) 89,935 75,537 Fire Equipment 443.281 600,000 (156,719) 381,793 225,074 Facilities Fund 4.237,330 4.423,757 (186,427) 279,172 92,745 Insurance , 9,314,897 8,886,545 428,352 1,704.024 2,132,376 FIDUCIARY FUNDS TRUST AND AGENCY FUNDS Firemen's Pension 258,072 254,936 3,136 3,561,463 3,564.599 Economic Development Corp 8,600 8,385 215 34,157 34,372 TOTAL GROSS BUDGET 168,392,739 172,793,501 (4,400,762) 29,970.901 25,570,139 LESS Internal Service Funds 20,425,400 20,425,400 Other Transfers 17,994,585 17,994,585 TOTAL BUDGET 129.972,754 134,373,516 (4,400,762) 29,970,901 25,570,139 10 CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON 2002 Budget Adjustment Ordinance Exhibit B 10 Inc(Dec) Beginning Ending in Fund Fund Fund Revenues Expenditures Balance Balance Balance GOVERNMENTALFUNDS GENERAL FUND 62,008,442 64.678,862 (2,670,420) 8,091,435 5,421,015 Adjustments per November reports (216,036) (216,036) Anticipated contractual increases 200,000 (200.000) (200.000) Budget Reductions Council (4,854) 4,854 4,854 Mayor's Office (49,771) 49,771 49,771 Employee Services (37,000) 37,000 37,000 Legal (30,596) 30,596 30,596 Finance (34,335) 34,335 34,335 Police 81,000 (254,856) 335,856 335,856 Fire (347,661) 347,661 347,661 Municipal Court (22,500) 22,500 22,500 Community Development (71,794) 71,794 71,794 Public Works (88,702) 88,702 88,702 Parks, Recreation, Community (148,841) 148,841 148,841 Information Services (79,931) 79,931 79,931 Fleet Services (16,447) 16,447 16,447 Facilities (57,460) 57,460 57,460 Reduce Contingency (29,713) 29,713 29,713 Other Technical Adjustments Add Court Clerk offset by 40,665 36,968 3,697 3,697 additional court revenue Total General Fund 62,130,107 63,641.369 (1,511,262) 7,875,399 6,364,137 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS Street 4,993,734 4,930.974 62,760 637,447 700,207 Lodging Tax Fund 108,774 145,000 (36,226) 43,592 7,366 Youth/Teen Programs 744.162 790,886 (46,724) 243.918 197.194 Capital Improvement Fund 8,544,088 10.488,668 (1,944,580) 2,615,739 671,159 Police Projects eliminated 81,000 81,000 Finance reallocation 7,139 (7,139) (7,139) Total Capital Improvement Fund 8,625,088 10.576,807 (1,951,719) 2,615,739 664,020 Criminal Justice 2,307.865 2,711,942 (404,077) 1,258,171 854,094 Environmental Mitigation 185,006 147,729 37,277 262,734 300,011 Community Block Grant 615,671 615.671 Other Operating Projects 601,376 601,376 DEBT SERVICE FUNDS Voted 1,790,000 1,786,503 3,497 57,028 60,525 Councilmamc 7,297,236 7,297,236 Special Assessment 2,625,089 2,819,169 (194.080) 3,222,952 3,028,872 CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON 2002 Budget Adjustment Ordinance Exhibit B Inc(Dec) Beginning Ending in Fund Fund Fund Revenues Expenditures Balance Balance Balance CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS Street Projects 7,526,000 7,526,000 Parks Projects 5,263,640 5,263.640 Other Projects 3,140,000 3,140,000 Convert professional services to (95,000) 95,000 95,000 salaries &benefits(1 FTE) 95,000 (95,000) (95,000) Total Other Projects 3,140,000 3,140.000 PROPRIETARY FUNDS ENTERPRISE FUNDS Water 8,838,764 9,589,921 (751,157) 3.207,184 2,456.027 Sewerage 24,120,958 24,030,931 90,027 1,345,057 1,435,084 Golf Complex 3,334,500 2,995,668 338,832 (87,062) 251,770 INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS Equipment Rental 2,657,533 2.769,602 (112,059) 3,238,198 3,126,129 Budget reductions (24,187) (24,187) Total Equipment Rental 2,633,346 2.745,415 (112,069) 3,238.198 3,126,129 Central Services 7,373,212 7,387.610 (14,398) 89,935 75,537 Information Technology reductions (123,969) (123,9691 Total Central Services 7,249,243 7,263,641 (14,398) 89,935 75,537 Fire Equipment 443,281 600,000 (155,719) 381,793 225,074 Facilities Fund 4,302,330 4.488,757 (186,427) 279,172 92,745 Budget Reductions (65,000) (65,000) Total Facilities Fund 4,237,330 4,423,757 (186,427) 279,172 92,745 Insurance 9,314,897 8,886.545 428,352 1,704,024 2,132,376 FIDUCIARY FUNDS TRUST AND AGENCY FUNDS Firemen's Pension 258,072 254,936 3,136 3,561,463 3,564,599 Economic Development Corp 8,600 8,385 215 34,157 34,372 TOTAL GROSS BUDGET 168,392,739 172,793,501 (4,400,762) 29.970,901 25,570,139 LESS Internal Service Funds 20.425,400 20,425,400 Other Transfers 17,994,585 17,994,585 TOTAL BUDGET 129,972,754 134,373,516 (4,4110,762) 29,970,901 25,570,139 12 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, amending the 2002 Budget by enacting a net reduction of expenditures to the General Fund by making certain technical adjustments and restoring the General Fund's Fund Balance to 10%. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT,WASHINGTON,DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS• SECTION] -Budget Amendments Pursuant to RCW 35A.33.120, the budget for the 2002 fiscal year is hereby amended to include budget fund adjustments as summarized in Exhibit "A,"and as more fully set forth in Exhibit "B," all of which are incorporated in this ordinance by this reference. These amendments are adopted in the amounts and for the purposes established and the amendments shall be included in the City's 2002 fiscal year budget. SECTION 2. - Severability. If any one or more sections, subsections, or sentences of this Ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect. 1 2002-Budget Adjustment SECTION 3. -Effective Date This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force five (5) days from and after the date of passage and publication as provided by law. JIM WHITE, MAYOR ATTEST• BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM- TOM BRUBAKER, INTERIM CITY ATTORNEY PASSED day of , 2002 APPROVED day of 2002. PUBLISHED• day of 2002. I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No. ,passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the City of Kent as hereon indicated. (SEAL) BRENDA JACOBER CITY CLERK 2 2002-Budget Adjustment +i:,;c'j1i '' '•; ;r il ' 11 % ^; N t' '� ' eF�,x ppK+c�S' � } f n' Fit - �, v cal Mee R her Bus ' {11 R 1 fF ' � a i 1 i 1. S� �E Ts STREET I "� MNTR/STI SET ? SW SET s! ; t_ REPEAL 3;19 iWCE p 1 `" _ &�Y' S'S ENZ': 1 . 1 r ,lptaar t� . ��° dies " dedicated to street i c�v� merufi' proat 'i� ueefui tco �. " in developing certain x! et improvetme Oerim tax sunsets on ,December 31, 07 . $ecause- OAnot �r guarantee° the continua c>nni of this tax. -rate, it i@"A difficult to obtain bo @, grants, anal- rm funding" _ + r for certain capital i Ovement Pro'jeImo be �-t- supported,. � � in part, his tax,, Tka,ia tax or taxi�, i o - # increase ,- just a repe of the 2007 °8 " -,Because E'' a traffic congestion a sportation-itfare top w9ii ki ' priorities, it is in •t City�s, beetC- it ve this sunset provision to a1' I ; for planning, ' development of these p j!Octs f14U1*4 bar: � I tax. �? 3 . EAEIIS TSs Ordinance lei i��; 4. RE2ROMfII ,BY': O erat 1,Committes (>Co�nittee, Staff, raer, © niSe 5. uNBMOMTZ� PSBCAL PER It�°; �� i ACES rt ' r - 6 . EIVU_33S RNQUIRED: 89R�Clx OF EMS: ' L . 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTTON'a i�1 �''oC �p : � ' 0 Couneiimesgber �i{� mves, Cqunca3� second E adoption of Ordinance ,anAnding l' �'��.18. Q2© of , the Kent City Code Y by fling-,tk�e D 007 sunset y provision on the inter 1i dedicated 'i AVrovement programs. } f' ` DISCUSSION- A 'I"ON: �To. 7B • �. i t J.� d i . srE; 4 V I F 4^4� Mike Martin KE N T Chief Administrative Officer Phone 253-856-5710 w.s H i N o r o N Fax 253-856-6700 DATE. February 6, 2002 TO Mayor White and Counciimembers FROM. Mike Martin AA101 SUBJECT Street Improvements/Street Utility Tax—Sunset Repeal - Ordinance During 1992 a Street Utility tax was enacted to fund transportation projects. This collected $1 90 per employee or residential equivalent with revenue of 50%, or$1,338,756, for 1993, the first full year. In 1996 this utility tax was repealed after a challenge of Seattle's Street Utility tax At that time a revenue-neutral 1% increase in the city's utility tax was approved by Council with the funds from this dedicated to transportation projects At that time a sunset date was included It was believed that the legislature would either revise the Street Utility tax or find replacement transportation funding To date, neither legislative solution has been provided • The Operations Committee has recommended repealing the sunset date from the 1% portion of the utility tax that is used for transportation projects currently This provides approximately 50% of the Street Project Revenue as shown in Attachment#1 Other Street Revenues are the Street Gas Tax which provides approximately $1,730,000, or 35%, in 2003 and the $15 Motor Vehicle Registration Fee (approximately 15% or $761,000 in 2003) Currently this Motor Vehicle Registration Fee is proposed to be eliminated as part of Tim Eyman's new Initiative 776 Attachment#2 shows that, since 1993, 71 4%, or $13,285,140 of the Street Utility Tax, has funded corridors (or their Debt Service Payments) primarily for the 272nd and 196`" Corridors Other key projects funded are intersection improvements, guardrails, Meeker Street improvements, miscellaneous transportation projects, nine engineenng/admin- istrative positions primarily charged to projects, and two street tree maintenance positions Street Utility Funds are often used to provide the city match for the transportation grants that we receive. Over the period of time that we have collected utility funds there has been an increase in grant funding on a yearly basis from $1 9 million to $4 7 million These monies have given us a significant amount of leveraging in funding projects and the citizens have benefited as we have more financial resources available to address transportation issues Street Utility Funds have also been used to provide the necessary city match for LIDS that hav, been formed to fund city road projects Without city funding on these projects the LIDs would never have been formed and the projects would have never been built Since the inception of the collection of utility funds, $26 5 million in LIDs have been created and spent on road projects Street Improvements/Streat Utility Tax—Sunset Repeal Page 2 Although we have spent a significant amount on corridor and other transportation improvements, much more still remains to be done Traffic congestion is still Kent citizens' number one concern Two primary protects, the west leg of 228th Corridor and the street Infrastructure Improvements for Kent Station will shape Kent's traffic and economic future Kent Station Improvements include Second Avenue road extension, widening of Fourth Avenue, and Intersection Improvements on Fourth Avenue This will provide roads, sidewalks with street trees, Illumination, underground power, water and storm stubs, and, new or modified signals Also, funds are needed for continued arterial and Intersection improvements and other transportation related protects The Street Utility Tax is key to accomplishing these protects Currently the one percent utility tax is due to sunset in 2007 We are asking that the sunset date be removed so that Kent can continue with the planned protects. Councilmanic Debt will need to be issued for major transportation protects this year and will require a twenty year commitment of Street Revenue Attachment#3 shows the approximate $6,872,000 deficit that would result by 2011 if the sunset is not removed and this would Increase significantly beyond 2011 (even more if the Motor Vehicle Tax is eliminated by initiative) or in future years when we add the railroad overpasses to the Capital Plan This is not an increase in the Utility Tax, but is a removal of the 2007 sunset that will allow Kent to continue transportation Improvements in the future COUNCIL ACTION Authorize the adoption of Ordinance No amending Section 3 18.020 repealing the sunset provision on the 1% Utility Tax dedicated to the Street Improvement Program ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, amending Section 3 18 020 of the Kent City Code, entitled "Certain utilities subject to tax," by repealing the sunset provision of December 31, 2007 on the interim tax dedicated to street improvement programs. WHEREAS, the interim tax on utilities dedicated to street improvement programs has been a useful tool in developing certain street improvements; and WHEREAS, the interim tax sunsets on December 31, 2007, and �I WHEREAS, the short-term remaining on the interim tax makes it difficult to perform long range planning and pursue funding of projects funded by the tax, and WHEREAS, traffic congestion and street improvements to relieve the same are top priorities for the City, and WHEREAS, it is in the City's best interest to remove the sunset provision to allow for planning,-funding, and development of street projects funded by the interim tax, NOW THEREFORE, 1 Utility Taxes— Cli. 3.18 Repeal Sunset Provision THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS. SECTION 1. Section 3.18 020, entitled "Certain utilities subject to tax," is hereby amended to read as follows- Sec. 3.18.020. Certain utilities subject to tax. A In addition to the other business and license fees required by the ordinances of the city, there is hereby levied upon all persons (including the city) engaged in certain business activities a utilities tax to be collected as follows 1 Upon every person engaging in or carrying on any telephone business within the city, an annual tax equal to three and one-half(3 1/2) percent of the total gross operating revenues, including revenues from intrastate toll, derived from the operation of such business within the city. In addition, there shall also be assessed a tax of three-tenths (0 3) percent, which revenue from said tax shall be dedicated to youth teen programs, plus an-HAefffn tax of one (1 0) percent orc etwe until , 1.co ., fn e Deeember 41 2007 which revenue from said inter tax shall be dedicated to street improvement programs Gross operating revenues for this purpose shall not include charges which are passed on to the subscribers by a telephone company pursuant to tariffs required by regulatory order to compensate for the cost to the company of the tax imposed by this chapter 2 Upon every person engaging in or carrying on a business of selling, furnishing, distributing, or producing gaseous gas for commercial or domestic use or purposes, a fee or tax equal to three and one-half (3 1/2) percent of the total gross income from such business in the city during the tax year for which the license is required. In addition, there shall also be assessed a tax of three-tenths (0.3) percent, which revenue from said tax shall be dedicated to youth teen programs, plus an+ntemn tax of one (1 0) percent effeetive until 1 , cn . m ., De,.embe_ Z, 2907 which revenue from said iatenfn tax shall be dedicated to street improvement programs. 2 Utility Taxes— Ch. 3.18 Repeal Sunset Provision 3 Upon every person engaged in or carrying on the business of selling, furnishing, or distributing electricity for light and power, a fee or tax equal to three and one-half(3 1/2) percent of the total gross income from such business in the city during the tax year for winch a license is required. In addition, there shall also be assessed a tax of three-tenths (0.3) percent, winch revenue from said tax shall be dedicated to youth teen programs, plus a&4atenm tax of one (1.0) percent er a , which revenue from said interAr tax shall be dedicated to street improvement programs. 4. Upon every person engaging in or carrying on a business providing garbage service, a tax equal to six and one-half (6 1/2) percent of the total gross income from such business in the city during the tax year for which the license is required In addition, there shall also be assessed a tax of three-tenths (0 3) percent, which revenue from said tax shall be dedicated to youth teen programs, plus aa-+� tax of one (1 0) percent a feetive uRW 11-59-pfn. eFt Deeember 31, 22007, which revenue from said inten tax shall be dedicated to street improvement programs 5 Upon every person (including the city) engaging in or carrying on the business of selling, furnishing or distributing water, sewer or drainage services, a tax equal to three and one-half (3 1/2) percent of the total gross income from such business in the city during the tax year In addition, there shall also be assessed a tax of three-tenths (0.3) percent, which revenue from said tax shall be dedicated to youth teen programs, plus an-wAeftm tax of one (1 0) percent Tl,.,.,.mber 31 2nm which revenue from said iatefim tax shall be dedicated to street improvement programs B In computing the tax provided in subsection (A) of this section, the taxpayer may deduct from gross income the following items 1 The actual amount of credit losses and uncollectibles sustained by the taxpayer 3 Utility Taxes-Ch. 3.18 Repeal Sunset Provision 2 Amounts derived from the transactions in interstate and foreign commerce which the city is prohibited from taxing under the laws and Constitution of the United States SECTION 2. —Severabelety If anyone or more section, subsections, or sentences of this Ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect. j SECTION 3. —Effective Date This ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty(30) days after passage as provided by law. JIM WHITE, MAYOR ATTEST BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM �I ROGER LUBOVICH, CITY ATTORNEY 4 Utility Taxes— Ch. 3.18 Repeal Sunset Provision PASSED day of 2002. APPROVED day of 2002 PUBLISHED day of 2002. I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No. passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the City of Kent as hereon indicated (SEAL) BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK pG W Mvv PtlrDltlu-4gea6 I 5 Utility Taxes— Cit. 3.18 Repeal Sunset Provision I I o r � r o N i r I I r I I M ' o 0p r In CA r o 04rrt7 I Cy 0) e I a � 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 000000 Cu x 0 0 0 0 0 o N a) Co m M CA r r r M In N N LL F- E O 1- U) CO N N M a CC u c T O (D o rUJinV m (D t N r N fx0 C (a � N N N L N N 7 r = C = N O LL7) LL m Mr C70M R C W I Ep r� CO LO COr Lo e W X * CO V CA f, O c �o E Cl) O O r O V CO Cl) M f- C CD NOMMCo rl N a) Co M Cl) co co r p a r C14 p 0 Cl) N 0 L a R N CO) c C O Li M 'n d o y (D co x 0) = N C) O C LL CCD Ec a D a) LL _a o a� � � rO = c ac in i L '- N x x O - a is Co x x p .r. l9 ,�-C M N T C tt LL C6 C6 H m H w w L d C y y S d 0 O C 7 p N y O > > O �? F- LL LL CL tN 7 N > LL LL MU) 0 m ® ■ Um m Co x a L 3 EXHIBIT #2 Street Utility Fund - Projects Funded Since Inception Amount % Corridors (272nd and 196th) 12,043,081 64.7% Debt Service - Corridors 1,242,059 6 7% ' Salaries, Benefits and Related Expenses 1,082,749 5.8% Intersection Improvements 1,041,000 5 6% Sidewalks 882,375 4.7% Meeker Street Improvements 710,631 3.8% Guardrails 450,000 2.4% 72nd Avenue 445,000 2 4% Other Expenses 200,495 1.1% Road/Railroad Separation 125,000 0.7% Bike Paths 100,000 0.5% Automation Project 100,000 0 5% Pacific Highway HOV Lanes 75,705 0.4% Neighborhood Traffic Control 75,000 0.4% Asphalt Overlays 28,226 0 2% Total 18,601,321 100% Nine Engineering/Administrative positions, primarily charged to projects, and two Park Street Tree Maintenance positions 1282002Exh#2•Street Fund-As 4 CITY OF KENT TEN Y EAR PRELINENARY FORECAST STREET FUND Amounts in 000's 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total �venues cuel Tax-Unrestricted 1,164 1,179 1,194 1,209 1,224 1,240 1,256 1,272 1,272 1,288 12 293 Fuel Tax-Restricted 543 551 558 555 572 579 586 594 594 602 5,744 'Motor Vehicle Registration Fee$15 751 761 771 781 791 801 811 821 821 832 7,941 Utility Taxes 2,387 2,421 2,455 2,489 2,524 2,559 14,835 Interest 8 Other Income 149 23 23 23 23 23 24 25 25 26 364 Total Revenues 4,994 4,935 5,001 5,067 5,134 5,202 2,677 2,712 2,712 2,748 41,182 Proceeds LTGO Bonds 4,416 3,500 1,525 9,441 Total Revenue and Other Sources 9,410 4,935 8,501 5,067 6,659 5,202 2,677 2,712 2,712 2,748 50,623 Debt&Operating Expenditures Last Print 272nd Corridor/240th Street 380 383 376 163 168 165 166 167 167 168 2,303 99 LTGC,256th Street 2019 165 165 159 159 159 156 156 156 156 156 1,587 99 LTGO East Hill Maint Center Land 2019 49 49 48 46 48 47 47 47 47 47 475 Debt Service-2000 Parking Garage 2020 339 339 339 338 339 338 338 338 338 338 3,384 Debt Service-2000 KS Street/Traffic Imp 2020 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 1,400 Debt Service Corridors 353 353 976 977 1,096 1,098 1,098 1,098 1,098 8,149 Russell Road Shops 26 27 28 28 29 133 Subtotal Debt 1,073 1,429 1,415 1,822 5,831 1,970 1,972 1,974 1,974 1,976 17,436 Technology Plan 100 100 100 100 100 100 101 102 103 103 1,009 Transfer to General Fund-Diverted Road Tax 100 100 Street Utility Operations 73 81 84 87 90 93 95 98 101 101 904 Street Tree Maintenance Program 179 132 136 139 142 146 151 155 160 160 1,500 Total Debt and Operating Expenditures 1,525 1,742 1,735 2,148 2,163 2,309 2,319 2,330 2,338 2,340 20,949 Net Available for Capital Projects 7,885 3,193 6,786 2,919 4,496 2,893 358 382 374 408 29,674 Canrtal Proiect Requests ant Station Street/Traffic Improvements 2,900 2,900 otal Corridor Improvements 890 1,180 1,720 1,180 1,525 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 12,495 Total Arterials 1,017 261 300 375 1,150 400 400 400 400 400 5,103 Total Intersection Improvements 1,524 925 450 250 275 300 300 300 300 300 4,924 Total Other Improvements 1,490 1,157 1,180 1,204 1,226 1,104 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 11,761 Total Capital Project Requests 7,821 3,523 3,650 3,009 4,176 3,004- 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 37,183 Increase(Decrease)in Fund Balance 64 (330) 3,116 (90) 320 (111) (2,642) (2,618) (2,626) (2,592) (7,509) Total Beginning Fund Balance 637 701 371 3,487 3,397 3,717 3,606 964 (1,654) (4,280) 637 Total Ending Fund Balance 701 371 3,487 3,397 3,717 3,606 964 (1,654) (4,280) (6,872) (6,872) Currently earmarked to be eliminated as part of Eyman's new Initiative 776 FORECAST SPEC REV 2002-ds xIs110 wo utd no 776U792002 1§3 PM ' ICON # Kent City Council Meeting Date February 19, 2002 Category Other Business 1 SUBJECT LID 350—BIG K SANITARY SEWER&WATER MAIN—SET NEW PUBLIC HEARING DATE 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: On February 5, 2002, Council set the hearing date for the confirmation of the Final Assessment Roll for LID 350 to March 5, 2002 Staff recommends that this hearing date be rescheduled to Monday, April 1, 2002 at 4 00 p in In addition, staff proposes that, pursuant to RCW 35 44.070, the City Council delegate the members of the Public Works Committee to sit as the Board of Equalization on this LID to consider the assessment roll, to consider objections to the roll and to make such corrections and modifications as may appear lust and equitable. This will be the only hearing on the roll After the conclusion of the hearing, the Committee will make recommendations for Council action at a regular Council meeting, where the Council will confirm the assessment roll by ordinance 3 EXHIBITS: 4 RECOMMENDED BY: Staff • (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc) 5 UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES 6 EXPENDITURES REQUIRED: S SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7 CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds (1) to cancel the March 5, 2002,hearing date on the LID 350 final assessment roll, (2) to authorize the Public Works Comrmttee to sit as a Board of Equalization for the purpose of considering the LID 350 assessment roll, (3) to reschedule the hearing date to Monday, April 1, 2002, at 4-00 p in in City Council Chambers East, and (4) to direct the City Clerk to give appropriate statutory notice of the time and place and purpose of the meeting • DISCUSSION ACTION Council Agenda Item No 'r oIZ GaN�I I E, % Public Safety Comm Date: February 12,2002 1 SUBJECT.- Kent Police Department requests the acceptance of a SAFECO grant award in the amount of$5,000 00. 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Request by Kent Police Department for acceptance of SAFECO grant award in the amount of$5,000 00 This award funding will purchase pedal cars and city props for the Safety Education Officer Scooterville Program This program is a traffic safety education course for elementary school students. Accept and establish budget documents, as required. • 3 ENHIBITS : Document describing Scooterville Program Copy of award letter from SAFECO 4 RECOMMENDED BY: 5 UNBUDGETED FI i./P . O i IMPACT: NO YES 6. ENPENDITURE REQUIRED: SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7. MOTIQN: -To &c4x-pT -nkr. $5=)o.cp 5 0 c-taAmr AYj w r-ct vAv- C.U•ty 5, S/ N Fpuuctiotii iZ �iut Fkc:CLgA iA Committee member moves, Committee member seconds_ DISCUSSION: ACTION: • • ScootendUe Scooterville is a learning program that teaches students,K 6`'grade, about traffic and pedestrian safety incorporating classroom instruction and hands-on application The program was designed by a police officer in an effort to teach children about safety is an interactive learning environment ScooterviRe blends with the school's curriculum without taking valuable time from core subjects. The program is taught in a two-part process. There is a.classroom portion where students are taught about different street signs and what they mean_ Students are given information on rules of the road that can be used for bicycles as well as cars. The rules drivers need to obey are stressed so students understand them and don't get an unrealistic sense of safety Students are informed of reasons why they have to be defensive walkers and vehicle operators, to keep themselves safe. Students are taught and practice the arm signals for use in traffic while on a bike or driving a car Some of the topics covered for pedestrian safety are walking on the left side of the road, crossing at crosswalks, and safe crossing if a crosswalk is not available. Students must show proficiency in the above skills through classroom observation and discussion The second day of class is taught in conjunction with the students' scheduled Physical Education class. The school's gymnasium is set up as a miniature city with roads, traffic signals and crosswalks. Students are assigned a pedal car that is their size and fined with a helmet for safety Ten students are allowed on the track at a time. They are given a two minute time limit to traverse through the city obeying all rules of the • road, to include yielding for pedestrians. Approximately six adults, the PE teacher and five police officers will be stationed throughout the city If a student violates a traffic regulation, they are stopped and issued a notice of infracnon The student's vehicle is removed from the track so another driver may enter the course Students take the notice of infraction to the court area to pay their fine before they are allowed back on the track. Fines are paid in exercise increments. For example, speeding is a 25 sit-up fine, failure to signal is a 10 push-up fine, an accident would be 30 seconds of lumping rope. After their fines are paid students will wait their turn to drive again Students who are waiting their turn to drive will act as pedestrians walking through the city They too are subject to fines if they are not obeying the traffic rules for safe walking. The object of the game is to make it through Scooterville without any violations. Scooterville is an interactive learning tool, winch brings police officers and children together in a non-threatening environment Children learn the importance of traffic and pedestrian safety while interacting with police officers in a fun, memorable activity. • Iaaaary'I6,200Z AMERICA'S wpm Cnes Debra LeRoy Kent Police Department '?0 4th Avenue South Kent, WA. 99032-5895 Dear Nis. LeRoy It :s my pleasure to announce drat we have anprovea a gift m the amount of 35.000 00, for your two-day interactive presentation. Scooter ille. SAFECO is committed to imnrovtng communities. -1Ve daxe prae :a our :oug history of giving to and woriang ;with organizations to make our neignbcrncods virai xci safe. We looK forward o ourparmerstuo :widh Kind ?once Denartment :n worang towara our 2oai of Strengmemng America s Neignbornooas. •Sincereiv, Wency Lodhsneich Corporate Contributions dmw enriocure Grant Receives - ,, Ya>61 Date Because of IRS regulations reau=g writteti conurmanoa of contributions for 5250 of more.please sign, dare and retina a copy of this award letter acknowledging your receipt of our grant. • SA FECO' P4bhC adzUOm • SAFECO Plaza • Sande.WA 98185 • 206-545-5299 • wwwsafeco co= u�smw gg� , Fg r�, 5 T t{ ,i : WQRTS VROXA } 3`,F ��� A. COUNCIL PRESI�` y [ ♦r ' �" r�^R i arh P �� ICI E� i' S. OPERATIONS COMMA I'` �' C. PUBLIC SAFETY C T2?EE 3 D. PUBLIC WORKS 41 E. PLANNING COMMITe. q^� ar 6s,r a '* y} F. PARKS COMMITTEE s . i J r G. ADMINISTRATIVE R$ I� < 1 •u. I #' h ,a REP©RT& aBPECm Comp*. 3 rl ass i iJ It J OPERATIONS COMMITTEE MINUTES JANUARY 15, 2002 COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT Chair Rico Yingling, Leona Orr, Judy Woods STAFF PRESENT Mike Martin, Fred Satterstrom, John Hodgson, May Miller, Charlie Lindsey, Tom Brubaker, Simon Stocker, Nancy Richards, Jim Huntington, Jackie Bicknell PUBLIC PRESENT Ted Nixon The meeting was called to order by Chair Rico Yingling at 4 04 PM Approval of Minutes of December 4. 2001 Committee Member Judy Woods moved to approve the minutes of December 4, 2001 The motion was seconded by Committee Member Leona Orr and passed 3-0 Aouroval of Vouchers dated December 31, 2001 and January 15, 2002 Leona Orr moved to approve the vouchers dated December 31, 2001 and January 15, 2002 The motion was seconded by Judy Woods Ms Orr asked for information about the charges against the City Council's budget for approximately S3,500 dollars to Lyle Sumek. May Miller, Finance Director, said she would check into the charges and get back to Ms Orr The motion then passed 3-0 Surplus Equipment Wacilities Superintendent Charlie Lindsey reported that there were two John Deere yard tractors and one John Deere mower to surplus because the equipment had been replaced by newer models or was no longer used. Judy Woods moved to recommend to Council approval to surplus two John Deere yard tractors, equipment numbers 9945 and 9946, and one John Deere mower, equipment number 1008. The motion was seconded by Leona Orr and passed 3-0. Kent Downtown Partnership Contract Deputy City Attorney Tom Brubaker asked that the Kent Downtown Partnership Contract item be changed from an action item to an informational item. He said the contract was essentially the same as last year's and had already been budgeted and approved by Council in the amount of$32,000 Public Records Reauest Procedures—Ordinance Simon Stocker, Assistant City Attorney, said the public records request policy had been put into an ordinance form so it could be more easily accessed via the internet In addition, the ordinance was changed to include the recently hired Public Records Information Offices and also streamlines the process used within the City to address public disclosure requests Leona Orr commented that on page 6, section 105 050 A, it says "The city shall make an initial response within 5 business days if a request is received after 5 00 PM ", and, typically, the City closes business at 5 00 PM Ms Orr suggested that it would be more appropriate to set a 4 00 or 4 30 PM ime to give an additional day to make the 5 days, as it wouldn't be reasonable, if something came in at 4.00 o'clock in the afternoon, to be able to use that day as a response day After a certain tune in the afternoon, a request should be pushed out one more day lust to make sure there is adequate time to Operations Committee, 1/15/02 2 respond Simon Stocker said the RCW's don't make an exception for the time of day that the request comes in, and as long as it is within business hours, that day has to be counted as the day it was received. The law requires that a response be within 5 days, but it doesn't have to be giving the requested records— it can be only the acknowledgement that the request was received Also, a copy of the filled-out request form counts as a response Leona Orr questioned whether, on page 7, where it talks about inspection of records, "If they fail to contact the Records Management Officer within 14 day, the records shall be returned to the originating department", it should be added that a new request would have to be submitted to ask for those same records again Simon Stocker said the reason that sentence was mcluded was to put someone on notice that the records would be sent back to the onginating departments (which are specific instructions under the Inspection of Records section), and after being sent back to the original department, records would have to be regathered and the process started over. Ms. Orr suggested it would be beneficial to include that "a new request must be submitted", for the people who may not quite get the intent. Rico Yingling asked who sets the photocopying fees Mr Stocker said they were set by the RCW and, by law, are supposed to be the actual costs to the City of producing the records. If more than 15 cents a page is charged, it would have to be justified in court Leona Orr moved to recommend that Council adopt an ordinance establishing and codifying new policies relating to the processing of public records requests as presented and amended. The motion was seconded by Judy Woods and passed 3-0. Amendment to Excise Tax on Real Estate Sales— Ordinance Simon Stocker said the amendment to the Excise Tax on Real Estate ordinance was a housekeeping matter and did not change the amount being taxed RCW 82 46 010 allows the City to charge an excise tax in the amount of/< of 1% of the selling price of all real property RCW 82 46 035 allows the City to charge an additional %of 1% excise tax on all real property The City, in the past, chose to impose both of those excise taxes but put them in different sections of the City code, which made it confusing The amendment bnngs the two code sections, 3 19 and 3 24, together and makes it more understandable but doesn't change any of the process Leona Orr said she believed the second quarter of one percent was dedicated funds for Parks projects, but since the ordinance didn't specify dedicated funds, that aspect should be included to prevent any confusion about where the money goes Judy Woods suggested that research be done and the item brought back to Committee at the next meeting No action was taken The meeting was adjourned at 4 20 PM Jackie Bicknell City Council Secretary PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE MINUTES JANUARY 7, 2002 COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT Chair Leona Orr, Julie Peterson, Rico Yingling STAFF PRESENT Don Wickstrom, Gary Gill, Tom Brubaker, Jackie Bicknell PUBLIC PRESENT. Elsy Rust, Jim Rust The meeting was called to order by Chair Leona Orr at 5 03 PM Approval of Minutes of November 19, 2001 Committee Member Rico Yingling moved to approve the minutes of November 19, 2001 The motion was seconded by Committee Member Julie Peterson and passed 3-0 Coordinated Prevention Grant Agreement—WSDOE #G0200155 Public Works Director Don Wickstrom said the Coordinated Prevention Grant, which the City has received from the state for over 10 years, is a two year program that helps promote the existing recycling program The money from the grant, $84,335, is used to buy and distribute compost bins and for purchasing recycled materials (in this case, the rain barrels that the City furnished at the special recycling event during the drought) Mr Wickstrom said Conservation Specialist Robyn Bartelt is the coordinator and her salary was already budgeted so there will be reimbursement from that. The local share is $28,112. Rico Yingling moved to recommend that Council authorize the Mayor to sign the grant agreement and direct staff to accept the grant and establish a budget of$84,335. The motion was seconded by Julie Peterson and passed 3-0. Waste Reduction & Recycling Program/Grant- #D30710D Don Wickstrom said the Waste Reduction and Recycling Program Grant in the amount of$171,030 is a two year program received from King County for the City's Optional Recycling Events and Business Recycling Program The events are held twice yearly and enable citizens to recycle materials not included in curbside collection programs The grant requires the City to purchase recyclable materials, primarily park benches that have to be put out where people can see what they can get with recycled material. Placement is coordinated with the Parks Department Julie Peterson asked what percentage of the apartment buildings had recycling and questioned whether the program might allow for even more assistance to multi family units Don Wickstrom responded that he didn't know the number of apartment buildings involved, but said the intent was to continue with the existing program and, hopefully, to expand and increase it even more He mentioned that Robyn Bartelt goes out on a one by one basis, and sets up how to do the program Ms. Peterson asked if the fund would allow an apartment complex to offer the service to the residents free of charge Mr. Wickstrom said the program was more of a promotional service that provides literature to the residents and shows them the benefit of recycling. The residents then have to set the program up with their waste hauler Leona Orr asked what percentage the City was at in its recycling goal Mr. Wickstrom said the yard waste program had put the City over the top on meeting the county's goal of over 65% in waste reduction. He added that it has been a very successful program Public Works Committee, I/7/02 2 Julie Peterson moved to recommend to Council authorization for the Mayor to sign the grant agreement and direct staff to accept the grant and establish a budget of$171,030. The motion was seconded by Rico Yingling and passed 3-0. Kent/Covington Water District Agreement Don Wickstrom said the Kent/Covington Water District Agreement was in conjunction with the Tacoma Second Supply Pipeline project presently under construction. Covington and Kent have chosen to proceed ahead in order to get water by next summer while the main pipeline is being built. The main line is not directly connectable to the source, so Kent and Covington have to run a line from the main to their present systems, and both are extending that main in order to have water available at their sources and to get it into their systems Covington is the lead agency on the project, which will cost Kent about $900,000 Mr. Wickstrom said it was a tight time frame. Rico Yingling asked why Covington was the lead agency Mr Wickstrom said it was because the line was in their district, and it would be a permit morass for Kent to build water mains in and outside of its franchise area Once the project is built, it will be Covington operated but Kent will have capacity, and (like with the Tacoma Pipeline) will be paying ongoing costs Deputy City Attorney Tom Brubaker commented that the agreement document was a draft document but because of the expedited timeline, staff wanted to get it before the Committee He said there should be revisions and negotiations, and language would be finalized so the Council would have a final document for review He said he hoped it would be ready to go to the first Council meeting in February and the bid be awarded sometime in February Rico Yingling asked where the two ends of the pipeline were Mr Wickstrom said the Second Supply Pipeline extends only from the Green River (close to the Howard Hansen Dam), and 9,000 feet down from the dam there's a branching off and the pipe ends close to Kentlake High School It has to go from the high school to Kent Springs which is at about 288`h and 2161h Kent owns 75 acres there (the Kent Springs source) and there are two transmission mains. The Clark Springs transmission main and the Kent Spnngs transmission come in through that source and water can funnel into the existing transmission mains at that point. Kent's water rights will be for five million gallons a day capacity from the system, a flow meter will be installed for measurement Rico Yingling asked if Kent would pay an administrative charge to Covington Don Wickstrom said Kent and Covington would be splittmg the ongoing operation and maintenance costs of the pipeline Tom Brubaker added that he had discussed with Covington's attorney and internally with the Kent Public Works Department a cost allocation based on volume of water usage He said the theory is that Kent may use the water more as a backup supply as opposed to a direct regular daily source, so Covington may use more water than the City of Kent. The parties involved are looking for a fair way to allocate the cost of ongoing maintenance and operations In response to Leona Orr's question for clarification about the cost of materials and repairs where it says, "Covington shall coordinate maintenance and repair activity" and "material used in repair and maintenance shall be charged at the actual cost plus 15%", Don Wickstrom said the details hadn't been worked out yet Tom Brubaker added that the language may change. Ms. Orr asked if the item would be coming back to Committee in a revised form Mr. Brubaker said the plan was to take it straight to Council; the agreement was brought to Committee now for the opportunity to review it so the full, final, revised, negotiated document could go to the full Council on February 5, 2002 He said the pipeline needs to be built this year and staff is working as fast as Public Works Commmee, 1/7/02 3 possible to get the agreement ready If it's ready by the next Public Works Committee meeting, it could come back to Committee Ms. Orr recommended that the item go under "Other Business" at the Council meeting She noted also that some technical corrections needed to be made. Rico Yingling moved to recommend to Council authorization for the Mayor to sign the Kent/Covington Water District Joint Agreement upon concurrence of the language therein by the Public Works Director and the City Attorney. The motion was seconded by Julie Peterson. Leona Orr offered a friendly amendment that the motion include `upon approval of the City Council at the first meeting in February and that it be placed under Other Business'. The motion then passed 3-0. Ms. Orr mentioned that as the new chair of the Committee, she was working out a possibly different schedule for the meetings She noted that the first and third Monday's generally work well as long as they are the Mondays before a Council meeting The meeting adjourned at 5 30 PM Jackie Bicknell City Council Secretary nFe^4 -5 �• � ` �� � �e� iif 6j k'y f i ` 1 �'J k 4 t 1 -a IT Ae+ `� ,rn y 41 �p l E v , Ij ft 7 i j "'r.T` �� yt r. %s � m F 1� ! lid; f f 4