Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Meeting - Council - Minutes - 02/07/1989 Kent, Washington February 7, 1989 Regular meeting of the Kent City Council was called to order at 7 : 00 p.m. by Mayor Kelleher. Present: Councilmembers Biteman, Dowell, Houser, Johnson, Mann, White and Woods, Acting City Administrator Harris, City Attorney Driscoll, Acting Planning Director Satterstrom, Public Works Director Wickstrom and Finance Director McCarthy. Also present: Police Chief Frederiksen, Fire Chief Angelo, Assistant City Administrator Hansen and Personnel Director Webby. Approximately 60 people were at the meeting. PRESENTATIONS Employee of the Month. Mayor Kelleher announced that Bonnie Fell, Accounting Specialist for the Engineering Department has been selected as Employee of the Month for February. He commended her for her positive attitude and dependability, and presented her with the Employee of the Month plaque. American History Month. The Mayor read a proclamation declaring the month of February, 1989 as American History Month in the City of Kent. He presented the proclamation to Councilmember Woods, Professor of History at Green River Community College. Kent City Employees Day. The Mayor noted that during the recent cold weather and snow, the Police, Fire, Public Works Maintenance and other City departments had worked very hard and demonstrated the "Kent Cares" attitude in helping the citizens of Kent. He then proclaimed February 7 , 1989 as Kent City Employees Day in the City of Kent. CONSENT Councilmember WHITE MOVED, that Consent Calendar CALENDAR Items A through Q be approved with the exception of Items E, L, N and O which were removed by Councilmember White and Item M which was removed by Councilmember Dowell . Councilmember Biteman seconded and the motion carried. MINUTES (CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM 3A) Approval of Minutes. APPROVAL of the minutes of the regular Council meeting of January 17 , 1989 . 1 February 7, 1989 HEALTH AND (CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM 3G) SANITATION Kent Meadows Apartments. ACCEPTANCE of the bill of sale and warranty agreement for construction of approximately 990 feet of water main extension, 1, 196 feet of sanitary sewer extension, and 2 , 200 feet of street improvements in the vicinity of S.E. 248th St. and 104th Ave. S.E. for the Kent Meadows Apartments and release of the cash bond after expiration of the one year maintenance period. (CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM 3H) Bend of the River Apartments. ACCEPTANCE of the bill of sale and warranty agreement for construction of approximately 1, 038 feet of water main extension, 965 feet of sanitary sewer extension, 260 feet of street improvements, and 802 feet of storm sewer improvements in the vicinity of S. 259th St. and South Central for the Bend in the River Apartments and release of the cash bond after expiration of the one year maintenance period. (CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM 3I) Lakes Division II. ACCEPTANCE of the bill of sale and warranty agreement for construction of approximately 4 , 407 feet of water main extension, 5,892 feet of sanitary sewer extension, 1, 141 feet of street improvements, and 3, 315 feet of storm sewer improvements in the vicinity of Lakeside Boulevard and S. 220th St. for the Lakes Division II project and release of the cash bond after expiration of the one year maintenance period. STREETS (CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM 3K) LID 330 (64th Avenue Improvements) . ADOPTION of Resolution 1192 setting March 7 as the date of the public hearing on formation of LID 330. STREET Glacier Park Company - 80th Pl. S. Acting City VACATION Administrator Harris requested that the public hearing on the Glacier Park Company application for vacation of a portion of 80th P1 . S. be continued to the February 21st meeting. There were no objections and it was so ordered. 2 February 7 1989 GREEN RIVER (CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM 3J) LEVEE Green River Levee Improvements (S. 212th St. Bridge) . ACCEPT as complete the contract with R. W. Scott Construction for the Green River Levee Improvements project for the final contract cost of $295,779. 58 and release of retainage after receipt of the releases from the State. PROPERTY (CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM 3N) ACQUISITION REMOVED BY COUNCILMEMBER WHITE Property Acquisition - 72nd Ave. S. and S. 196th Street. Subject to final concurrence by the Public Works Director, AUTHORIZATION to proceed with the acquisition of property in the vicinity of 72nd Avenue and 196th Street and establishment of the project budget in accordance with the financing package proposed by the Director of Public Works, as approved by the Public Works Committee. Wickstrom noted for White that the property lies in the proposed alignment of the extension of 72nd Avenue, and that it would be less expensive to buy it at this time rather than after it has been developed. He also indicated that contamination is not significant enough to hinder the building of the road. WHITE MOVED to adopt Item 3N. Biteman seconded and the motion carried. SURPLUS (CONSENT CALENDAR ITEN 30) PROPERTY Surplus Property - 218th Street and S.R. 167. AUTHORIZATION to declare as surplus a parcel of property in the vicinity of S. 218th Street and S.R. 167 and to offer same for sale at fair market value and to direct the City Attorney to prepare the resolution setting the public hearing date for March 7, as approved by the Public Works Committee. Upon White' s question, Wickstrom explained that sale of this property will generate funds to acquire the property on 72nd Avenue S. and S. 196th St. , and that the property had been acquired when the City anticipated building channels through the valley. WHITE MOVED to adopt Item 30. Biteman seconded and the motion carried. 3 ar 7 1989 February Rec clip . Leona Orr, 24909 114th Ave. S.E. , noted RECYCLING y u that she has not yet received a toter for recycling. Harris stated that he had recently been told by the in hauler that they are experiencing a ined that theahauleremustg the toters. Biteman expla hat it will be go out of state for the tot hhe and de tdelivered. Upon the end of February before y Mann' s question, Wickstrom stated that they are looking into the possibility of having two pick-ups each month. (CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM 3M) REMOVED BY COUNCILMEMBER DOWELL Waste Reduction/Recycling Grant. AUTHORIZATION for the Public Works Department to pursue the continuation grants from King County for the City s recycling program, as approved by the Public Works Committee. Maureen McNamara 23839 94th Ave. S. , noted meeting that e DEVELOPER 1988 Counci COMPLAINTS had spoken at the December 20, in regard to problems she has expdrthecCatyed lfora developer in her area, dispute. their help in settling the dis P CABLE TV CATV Professional Services Agreement. Authorization is requested for the Mayor to sign the renewal -H Cable Communications Consultants. agreement with 3 3-H provides technical and customer services assistance to the City and cable television subscribers. Funds for this agreement are contained within the 1989 Budget. HOUSER MOVED to authorize with 3-H Cable Communication renewal of the contract man commended 3-H Consultants. White seconded. Bite for their outstanding assistance. The motion carried. LIBRARY (CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM 3P) Libra Remodel Architect Contract. AUTHORIZATION for the Mayor to sign the contract with Edberg Christiansen Architects for the library remodel project. 4 February 7 , 1989 POLICE (CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM 3Q) Credit Northwest Corp oration. AUTHORIZATIO N for th e Mayor to sign the contract with Credit Northwest Corporation to assist the Police Department in locating suspects and/or assist in background checks of applicants for the Police Department. OUT OF STATE (CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM 3C) TRAVEL "Managingthe Internal Affairs Function" Seminar. AUTHORIZATION for Chief Frederiksen, Captain Rees, and Captain Miller to attend an unbudgeted training seminar Managing the Internal Affairs Function" in Las Vegas, Nevada from February 15 - 17 , 1989 . Due to concerns expressed that recent internal investigations have been improperly conducted, it has been recommended that those involved in conducting these investigations receive further training. This seminar is sponsored by the International Association of Chiefs of Police and should be very beneficial to the Department. SUBDIVISION (CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM 3E) CODE REMOVED BY COUNCILMEMBER WHITE AT THE REQEST OF PAUL MORFORD. Lot Line Adjustment Ordinance. An ordinance has been prepared to amend Kent City Code 12 . 04 (Subdivison Code) to incorporate administrative procedures for lot line adjustment application submittal and review, and to clarify definition of accumulative short subdivision. Paul Morford stated that lot line adjustments have been one of the simplest and easiest processes he has gone through and questioned what changes would be made to the procedure. Satterstrom stated that this ordinance would simply put into ordinance form the procedures that have been followed administratively, and that there is nothing new in the process. Morford stated that since the system works as it is, he would not like to see it changed. Acting City Administrator Harris noted that this had been through a public hearing before the Planning 5 February 7 , 1989 SUBDIVISION Commission. He also noted that the issue is not CODE time sensitive. WHITE MOVED to hold this item for two weeks, during which time Mr. Morford could talk with Mr. Satterstrom to be sure his concerns are addressed. Houser seconded and the motion carried. PRELIMINARY (CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM 3F) SUBDIVISION Canterbury Preliminary Subdivision #SU-88-5. AUTHORIZATION to set February 21, 1989 as a public meeting to consider the Hearing Examiner's recommendation of conditional approval of a 20 lot single family residential preliminary subdivision located on the northeast corner of proposed 100th Ave. S.E. and S.E. 248th St. Hemlock Acres No. 17 Preliminary Subdivision #SU-88- 3. This public meeting will consider the Hearing Examiner's recommendation of conditional approval of a 17 lot single-family residential preliminary subdivision located on the north side of S.E. 240th St. approximately 300 ft. west of 116th Ave. S.E. Carol Proud of the Planning Department described the area. WOODS MOVED to adopt the findings of the Hearing Examiner and to concur with the Hearing Examiner's recommendation of conditional approval of the Hemlock Acres #17 Preliminary Subdivision. White seconded and the motion carried. Hemlock Acres No. 19 Preliminary Subdivision #SU-88- 4. This public meeting will consider the Hearing Examiner's recommendation of conditional approval of a 14 lot single-family residential preliminary subdivision located along the east side of 112th Ave. S.E. , approximately 650 feet north of S .E. 240th St. Kathy McClung of the Planning Department clarified for White that this project will include widening 112th Ave. S.E. WOODS MOVED to adopt the findings of the Hearing Examiner and to concur with the Hearing Examiner's recommendation of conditional approval of the Hemlock Acres #19 Preliminary Subdivision. Biteman seconded and the motion carried. 6 February 7 , 1989 REZONES Ruth Rezone (Kent East Hill Shopping Center) . On November 16 1988 and January4 1989 the Hearin � g Examiner recommended conditional approval of Alternative 1 on a request b Bar hausen Consulting # q Y g g Engineers, Inc. to rezone . 85 acres from MRM, Medium Density Residential and 15. 55 acres from 0, Professional and Office to CC, Community Commercial . The site is located at the southwest corner of 104th Ave. S.E. and S.E. 260th St. and is bounded by 100th P1. S.E. (Crow Road) to the west and S .E. 264th St. on the south. Kathy McClung of the Planning Department noted that the property is just over 23 acres and that the proposed shopping center would have 289 , 000 square feet of retail commercial space. She noted that there would be parking for 1500 vehicles. McClung stated that a final EIS has been issued by the SEPA official for the project with 75 conditions which include mitigating conditions in the areas of traffic, storm drainage, landscape buffers and noise. Upon White' s question, Wickstrom explained the traffic improvements as follows: 1 . Intersection improvements at SE Z56th ST/104th SE The intersection of SE 256th Street and 104th Avenue SE shall be widened to provide for a double exclusive southbound left-turn lane. The proposed intersection configuration will allow the signal operation to be revised to permit eight (8) phases of independent control.. 2 . Intersection signalization at SE 260th/104th SE A two-phase traffic signal system shall be constructed at the intersection of SE 260th Street and 104th Avenue SE. This intersection shall be interconnected with the intersection of SE 256th Street and 104th Avenue SE for computer control on the Cit 's Traffic Computer. 3. Improvements to 108th Avenue SE and its corinections to Kent=Kan 1V Road to SE 260th Street The intersection of SE 260th Street and 108th Avenue SE from the Kent-Kangley Road to SE 260th Street shall be reconstructed to provide a smooth curve from SE 260th Street to 108th Avenue SE. A traffic signal shall be installed at the intersection of Ke t- Kangley and 108th Avenue SE. This intersection shall be interconnected with the intersection of SE 256th Street and Ke t- Kangley Road for computer control on the City's Traffic Computed 7 February 7, 1989 REZONES 4. Right t= lane and improvement tg turning radius at interl8ection of Crow Road and Canyon Drive Right turn lane and improved turning radius shall be constructed to facilitate turns from Canyon Drive onto 97th Place SE (Crow Road . 5. Improvements to existing road s stem Street improvements shall be required on SE 264th Street and lot Avenue SE along the property frontage and shall be accordingi City of Kent Standards. 6. Right=o.f-way; dedication Right-of-way shall be dedicated for future improvements to 104th Avenue SE in order to provide for a five lane section. 7. Driveway access = SE 264th Street The driveway on SE 264th Street shall be constructed in such 'a manner as to provide for adequate maneuvering and storage for trucks within the designated loading area and to prohibit use of 100th Place SE. If the design of said access is determined to not prohibit use of 100th Palce SE then 100th Place SE shall be widened to 24 foot minimum and overlaid with asphalt paving designed sustain truck loading. 8. SE 272/277th Street Corridor Agreement The developer shall agree to participate in the formation of an LID to construct the South 272nd/277th Street corridor project in order to mitigate the estimated "new" PM peak hour trips traveling to and from the Valley Floor impacting critical intersections at level of service "E" or "F". Participation shall be based upon a proration of traffic generated by his center and the total traffic using the corridor. This condition shall be excuted in the form of an environmental mitigation agreement. 9. Except for emergency vehicle access and limited delivery service from SE 264th Street, vehicle access to the site will be restricted to 104th Ave nue SE and SE 260th Street. Upon White's question regarding the amount of mitigation money required, Wickstrom pointed out that the applicant would have to do an analysis of the off-site trips not being mitigated by the improvements. He noted that the improvements r ements are significant. 8 February 7 , 1989 REZONES WOODS MOVED to adopt the findings of the Hearing Examiner, to concur with the Hearing Examiner' s recommendation and to direct the City Attorney to prepare the rezone ordinance. Johnson seconded and the motion carried. Rent Hill Apartments Rezone #RZ-88-6. On December 7, 1988, the Hearing Examiner held a public hearing to consider an application by Pac-Tech Engineering, Inc. to rezone approximately 3 . 24 acres of a 6. 48 acre site from R1-7 . 2 , Single Family Residential, to MRM, Medium Density Multifamily Residential. The property is located at the southwest corner of 108th Ave. S.E. and S.E. 260th St. On January 4 , 1989 the Hearing Examiner recommended conditional approval of the rezone to MRG, Garden Density Multifamily Residential with the overall density of the site to be limited to a maximum 12 . 5 units per acre or approximately 80 units. The recommendation includes 8 conditions. Stephen Clifton of the Planning Department showed a map of the site and briefly described the zoning of the surrounding area. He described the applicants proposal to relocate the existing creek and the recommendation of the Hearing Examiner and staff to not allow such relocation. He noted that under existing zoning as many as 61 multifamily units would be allowed on the western half and 19 single units on the eastern half, for a total of 80 units. The recommendation for approval would allow the rezone but would not allow more units than could be developed under the existing zoning, thus meeting the intent of the Comprehensive Plan and the East Hill Plan. WOODS MOVED to adopt the findings of the Hearing Examiner, to concur with the Hearing Examiner' s recommendation to approve the rezone with the conditions and to direct the City Attorney to prepare the rezone ordinance. Johnson seconded. Woods noted that she did not usually favor multiple family structures, but that this compromise proposal keeps the density neutral . 9 February 7 , 1989 REZONES Johnson noted that Jeffrey Mann had submitted a packet of material today, which was distributed tonight. HE MOVED to accept the material for the record, White seconded and the motion carried. Jeffrey Mann of Pac-Tech Engineering noted that the request was for 123 units, 43 more than the 80 recommended. He stated that the additional 43 units would not appreciably affect traffic. He compared the traffic control requirements for this project to those for the large commercial development (Ruth Rezone) approved earlier this evening. Upon Dowell ' s questions Jeffrey Mann determined that the original request was for 19 units per acre which would equal 123 units and that this figure adhered to the 20% reduction. The 80 unit recommendation represents a reduction of more than 20%. He acknowledged that the stream could still be preserved if 19 units per acre were allowed and explained that some buildings would be 3 stories if 19 units were permitted. He confirmed that the recommendation for 12 . 5 units was based on not allowing more units than is allowed under the current zoning. He confirmed that the 8 conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner were acceptable to the applicant. White reviewed the Hearing Examiner's conditions and clarified that the density is based on the existing units allowed on that property, a combination of single family and multifamily, with the combination thereof spread out over the entire property. Woods stated that she would rather leave the parcel zoned as single family use than allow more than 80 units and White concurred. Dowell pointed out that higher use has been approved close to this parcel and that since the recommendation exceeded the recommended 20% reduction, he was inclined to consider allowing more than the 12 . 5 units per acre. Mayor Kelleher noted that 19 single family units could be developed on the site. He pointed out that Resolution 1123 calls for a 20% reduction in density in undeveloped 10 February 7 , 1989 REZONES multifamily land. He opined therefore that after Council action there should be 20% fewer units allowed than were allowed before such action. He noted further that this and other zoning actions taken tonight could greatly impact the traffic situation. Chris Grant of Woodland Way S. stated that the city had enough apartments and suggested that "Office" use be considered for this parcel. Doug Ellis of Northwest Investors stated that the Grubes had owned this land since 1947 and had resided there in a single family residence for more than 40 years. He stated that there was no demand for either "Office" or single family zoning, and that developing only 80 units might not be practical. He pointed out that the Grubes were paying $25, 000 per year on LID 308 assessments on the property. Paul Morford noted the proximity of commercial property and opined that development of 80 units would not be profitable, and opined that not allowing development at the highest and best use would deny the best use to the Grubes. He opined that this elderly couple should not be placed in this financial situation. Jim Orr stated that the area should remain zoned for single family homes. Leona Orr noted that there were many single family homes in the area and these owners might also request multiple zoning, piece by piece. She noted that excessive apartment complexes had prompted the Initiative and Referendum action. Paul Mann noted that there was no point in changing this zoning to multifamily. He commented that zoning for future annexations had to also be considered. He commented that he would rather see commercial zones than more apartment zoning. Jeffrey Mann noted that both the East Hill Plan and the Comprehensive Plan show multifamily for this site, and that this is the best use of the land. Biteman noted that studies of both the East hill and the West hill showed that densities would naturally be heavier in some places than others. He pointed out that he was impressed with the Hearing Examiner and the staff in that the densities recommended for this proposal were reduced by almost twice the 20% referred to in Resolution 1123 . 11 February 7, 1989 REZONES Dowell offered a substitute motion as a compromise: To allow 15 units per acre instead of 12 . 5 units. The City Attorney noted that if the Council modified the Hearing Examiner' s recommendation, a statement of the rationale for the change should be made for the record. Dowell 's proposal failed for the lack of a second. Wood' s motion then carried with Mann voting against it. Harris Rezone #RZ-88-7. On January 4 , 1989 the Hearing Examiner recommended conditional approval of a request by John R. Ewing and Associates to rezone approximately 0.71 acres from MHP, Mobile Home Park, to GC, General Commercial . The property is located on the west side of N. Washington St. (SR 181) , approximately 616 feet south of W. James St. Carol Proud of the Planning Department pointed out the location on the map. There were no questions or comments from the audience. JOHNSON MOVED to adopt the findings of the Hearing Examiner, to concur with the Hearing Examiner' s recommendation of approval with 2 conditions, and to direct the City Attorney to prepare the rezone ordinance. White seconded and the motion carried. ZONING CODE Zoning Code Amendment - Welfare Facilities in GC AMENDMENT Zone - #ZCA-88-10. On January 30, 1989 , the Planning Commission recommended approval of a Zoning Code amendment to define transitional housing facilities and to allow such facilities as principally permitted uses in the GC, General Commercial, Zoning district. Kathy McClung of the Planning Department noted that this item was initiated through the Regulatory Review Process. She explained that the existing code requires a conditional use permit for "welfare" facilities. It is recommended that the Zoning Code be amended as follows: 1. That Section 15. 02 of the Kent Zoning Code be modified to include the following definition of "transitional housing facilities" : 12 February 7 , 1989 ZONING CODE "A facility operated publicly or privately to provide housing for individuals and/or families who are otherwise homeless and have no other immediate living options available to them. Transitional housing shall not exceed an 18-month period per individual or family. " 2 . That the principally permitted uses of the GC zone (Section 15. 04. 140 2h of the Kent Zoning Code) be modified to add the following use: -Transitional housing facilities, limited to a maximum of 20 residents at any one time and four resident staff. (Facilities accomodating a larger number of residents require a condi- tional use permit. ) A map showing the General Commercial zones in the City was displayed. McClung confirmed for Dowell that if this amendment passes, the transitional housing facilities will be allowed in any General Commercial zone as a permitted use, without having a public hearing and without specific conditions such as consideration of traffic. Dowell noted that this item had been requested, heard before the Planning Commission and was now before the Council all within approximately one month. He stated that he preferred retaining the public hearing process through the regular conditional use permit process. McClung stated that the staff saw this as a way to help the public agencies. Dowell objected to changing the outright use of General Commercial zoned property and opined that more public notice should have been given. Harris explained that a facility which would house more than 20 persons would still have to go through the conditional use process. DOWELL MOVED to hold this matter over for 60 days to allow time for public input. White seconded. Woods stated that this item has had a public hearing through the Planning Commission, and that the reason prompt action is required is to avoid the loss of funding for the project. Upon White ' s question, McClung noted that all 13 February 7, 1989 ZONING CODE applications go through a development process and AMENDMENT that uses outside of traditional transitional housing would require a conditional use permit. She noted for Dowell that the intent is to expedite the process and reduce cost for agencies who depend on donations for this type of facility. Sharon Atkin of the South King County Multi-Service Center noted that the GC zones were served by transit and are near service centers. She stated that most users of transitional housing are children and single mothers. She noted that it is unusual to find a suitable piece of property, as well as the funding to go with it, and that she would not like to lose this opportunity. Upon Dowell ' s question, Atkin stated that the location is excellent for children because there are fenced areas for them, and that the residence has six bedrooms with room for two more. She noted that the property also has two two-bedroom houses where additional families could stay. Linda Martinez, Chairman of the Planning Commission, agreed that a GC zone is a good place for transitional housing because public transportation and schools are nearby, and that homes in this zone are affordable for social service agencies. Martinez noted for Dowell that there are money and time problems involved with grants, and a long hearing process could be a problem. Dowell suggested eliminating the hearing in all zones, not just GC. Satterstrom stated that the staff had considered that and had determined it would not be a good policy at this time, because other zones do not have the services available in a GC zone. Johnson noted that the regulatory review process allows citizens to voice disagreements with regulations, and that this item had been handled as any other. Dowell said that this is a fast track method of eliminating a public hearing which is presently required in the zoning code, and that he objects to eliminating the public' s right to have a 14 February 7 , 1989 ZONING CODE hearing as it now exists as a conditional exception. AMENDMENT WOODS MOVED to table Mr. Dowell ' s motion indefinitely. Johnson seconded. The Mayor stated that the motion is not debatable. The motion carried with only Dowell opposing. MANN MOVED to approve ZCA-88-10 as recommended by the Planning Commission and to direct the City Attorney to prepare the amending ordinance. Woods seconded. DOWELL MOVED to table the motion. The motion to table died for lack of a second. Biteman thanked the participants who made presentations and noted that if necessary a retraction could be made. DOWELL MOVED that the motion be amended to eliminate the hearing in all zones for conditional exceptions for transitional housing. Upon questions from the Mayor and Johnson, the City Attorney advised that the Council can determine whether or not to modify the Planning Commission's recommendation. There was no second to Dowell 's motion to amend and the motion died. Mann's motion to approve ZCA-88-10 as recommended by the Planning Commission and to direct the City Attorney to prepare the amending ordinance carried with Dowell opposing. HOUSING Cooperation Agreement for Low Rent Housing. The Cooperation Agreement (HUD Form 52481) between the King County Housing Authority and the City of Kent would result in the Authority establishing one unit of low rent housing within the city limits of Kent. Acting Planning Director Satterstrom noted that the project is located at 716 S. 3rd and that this matter had gone to the Planning Committee today. Woods noted that the Planning Committee recommended approval and MOVED to authorize the Mayor to sign the cooperative agreement with the King County Housing Authority for the low rent housing project to be located at 716 S. 3rd, subject to the review and approval of the City Attorney. Houser seconded. Upon Dowell 's question, Mr. Welty of the Housing Authority noted that since there is no requirement, there has been no notice to the public. Dowell stated that the contract should be available for 15 February 7 , 1989 HOUSING review by the public before Council action is taken. Woods noted that this area currently has a number of rental properties designed to serve low income individuals, and that the City has worked with the rental rehab program to ensure that there would continue to be low income rental units available in the City. Dowell noted that the contract states that the City would be required to vacate streets and grant deviations from the building code, among other things. City Attorney Driscoll stated that she had reviewed the contract, and that the Housing Authority has agreed to enter into an agreement whereby the contract applies only to this one particular house. She stated that no street vacations, rezones, or dedications would be necessary, and that utility services are already available at the location, and therefore those sections of the contract would not apply. She noted that with that proviso, she recommended approval of the agreement. Upon White's question, the Mayor indicated that he would defer to the Mayor Pro Tem to sign the document, since he is employed by the Housing Authority. The Mayor explained for Morford that HUD requires a contract whenever property is acquired. The motion carried with Dowell voting against it. INITIATIVE AND Resolution Adopting Initiative and Referendum REFERENDUM Powers. It was noted that on January 17 , 1989 a POWERS public hearing was held relating to initiative and referendum powers for the City of Kent. In accordance with Council instructions, the City Attorney hs prepared Resolution 1193 , declaring the City's intent to adopt the powers of initiative and referendum for the qualified electors. Driscoll noted that the resolution must be published within ten days. She further clarified that 90 days after the publication, the Council could pass an ordinance providing for the powers of initiative and 16 February 7 , 1989 INITIATIVE AND referendum. However, if a proper and sufficient REFERENDUM petition for a referendum is filed within the 90 POWERS days challenging this process, the matter would then go to the election process. HOUSER MOVED to adopt Resolution 1193 , Johnson seconded and the motion carried. PERSONNEL (CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM 3R) REMOVED BY ACTING CITY ADMINISTRATOR HARRIS Police Word Processing Positions. At the request of City Administrator Harris, this item was removed from the agenda and referred to the Operations Committee. City Administrator Position. Mayor Kelleher introduced Tom Waldron, Personnel Consultant, who announced that 460 resumes for the City Administrator position have been received. Waldron stated that that number has been reduced to 75, that screening will continue during February, and that a selection could made by the end of March. The Mayor added that Mr. Waldron will be conducting interviews with applicants on the West Coast and that he would conduct interviews on the East Coast. (CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM 3D) Golf Course. AUTHORIZATION to change the position of Golf Course Secretary/Bookkeeper from permanent part-time to full time. (CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM 3L) REMOVED BY COUNCILMEMBER WHITE E_nQineer II Position. As recommended by the Public Works Committee, CLARIFICATION of the position duties for the Engineer II position approved in 1989 Public Works budget. White noted that there has been a great deal of permit activity in the past year and that there seems to be a problem processing the permits in the plan checking area in Engineering. He noted that had asked during the budget process that the new 17 I February 7 , 1989 PERSONNEL position budgeted would check plans to avoid the 3-6 month delay in processing plans. White asked whether the change in the Engineer II position would still provide for processing permits on a timely basis. Wickstrom noted that part of the problem was that most permit activity is in a 6-month period rather than spread over the entire year. He also noted that design personnel is now used to back up the plans checker, which had not been done before. He noted that the new position would be coupled with plan checking, that it is one of many duties involved in the position of Engineer II . He said that permit processing is a volatile type of situation and that if they wanted only a plans checker, they could get by with a less costly Engineer I. He noted that what they requested in the budget was an Engineer II which has the ability to do a variety of things. White noted that at the present time the Engineering Department has one plans checker, and that he is leaving and asked how permits will be processed in the interim. Wickstrom stated that the design staff will cover the position, and that the position will be advertised immediately. The Mayor noted that he and the Council had received complaints that there has been only one plans checker to handle a great deal of development. He asked whether, even though development is unpredictable, having the Engineer II position would help avoid receiving complaints of this nature in the future. Wickstrom replied that during times of heavy development, the Engineer II would process the permits, as would the design staff if necessary, and that if the entire staff were checking plans, it would be the City' s construction projects which would slow down, rather than the developer's projects. Johnson stated that it would be helpful if all developments did not occur at the same time. He also stated that an Engineer II could work on such projects as water quality and drainage. White stated that taking 3-6 months to process permits is not acceptable, and that he had been assured during the budget process that we would be getting an additional fulltime plans checker. Johnson stated that he understood the budget request was for an Engineer II. Johnson said that no matter 18 February 7 , 1989 PERSONNEL how many employees are available to process permits, there will still be delays due to the limited construction season. Upon Dowell ' s question, Wickstrom noted that it would be possible to contract out some of the work during busy times, but that an Engineer II would give more flexibility, and it has already been approved in the budget. DOWELL MOVED to approve Item 3L and to request that Wickstrom prepare a report of the program and to consider the possibility of hiring contractors to take care of any overload situations. Biteman seconded. Biteman noted the item was approved with the understanding that the Engineer II would also work as a plans checker. He recognized that there is a deficiency in the plans checking area and felt the more talented individual should be hired. The motion carried. Employee Assistance Program Contract Renewal. AUTHORIZATION is requested for the Mayor to sign the renewal agreement with Southeast Community Alcohol and Drug Center. The Center provides employee assistance program services to Kent employees and their dependents. Funds in the amount of $3 , 000 for this program are contained within the 1989 Budget. HOUSER MOVED to authorize the renewal of the contract. White seconded and the motion carried. FINANCE (CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM 3B) Approval of Bills. APPROVAL of payment of the bills received through February 7 , 1989 after auditing by the Operations Committee at its meeting at 8 : 30 a.m. on February 15, 1989 . Approval of checks issued for vouchers: Date Check Numbers Amount 12/29 - 1/3 68006 - 68011 870,535.17 1/3 - 1/13 68417 - 68426 266,101.63 1/17/89 68434 - 68445 699,562 .32 68846 - 6890B 48,081.44 $1,884,280.56 19 February 7 , 1989 FINANCE Approval of checks issued for payroll: Date Check Numbers Amount 1/20/89 114280 - 114890 $ 197,360.53 REPORTS Council President. White commended the City employees who helped with frozen pipes and water problems during the recent cold weather. He also announced that the Council will meet at 6 : 00 p.m. on February 21st, one hour before the Council meeting, to gather input on council committee responsibilities. White then MOVED to approve $2000 for Council travel for himself and Johnson to attend the National League of Cities meeting in Washington, D.C. Woods seconded and the motion carried. Operations Committee. Houser noted that the last meetinghad been cancelled because of snow and that the meeting is rescheduled for February 15th at 2 : 00 p.m. Houser requested that the Council go on record in support of state funding of community programs to deal with drug/alcohol and traffic ffic safety issues at the local level. She stated that this is the last year there will be any federal funding, and asked that legislators be encouraged to get funding for the Drinking Driver Task Force. She asked for suggestions from the councilmembers. Biteman noted that th ey will y be meeting with the legislators later in the month. Public Works Committee. Johnson noted that the Public Works Committee would meet at 4 : 00 p.m. next Tuesday in the Engineering Building. EXECUTIVE Administrative Reports At 10: 10 p.m. , Acting City SESSION Administrator Harris announced that there would be an executive session of approximately 30 minutes to discuss pending litigation. 20 February 7► 1989 ADJOURNMENT The meeting reconvened and adjourned at 11: 15 p.m. Marie Jensen, CMC City Clerk 21