HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Meeting - Council - Minutes - 01/06/1986 i
Kent, Washington
January 6 , 1986
I
I
Regular meeting of the Kent City Council was called to order at
7: 00 p.m. by Mayor Kelleher. Present : Councilmembers Bailey,
Biteman, Houser, Johnson, White and Woods , City Administrator Cush-
ing, City Attorney DiJulio, Principal Planner Hansen and Public Works
Director Wickstrom. Also present: Assistant City Administrator
Webby, Fire Chief Angelo, Finance Director McCarthy and Parks Director
Wilson. Approximately 60 people were in attendance at the meeting.
COUNCIL Oath of Office. The City Clerk administered the
oath of office to newly elected Councilmembers
Biteman, Houser and Johnson. (Mayor Kelleher was
sworn in on December23 . ) All are four year terms.
PERSONNEL Employee of the Month. The Street Division has been
chosen to receive the Employee of the Month award
for January. Public Works Director Wickstrom noted
the dedication of the employees during the snow in
November. The crew worked many hours each day in
order to keep the city streets in service. Street
Supervisor Bob Hughes and Assistant Johnnie Nall
accepted the award from Mayor Kelleher, on behalf
of the entire crew.
CONSENT JOHNSON MOVED that the Consent Calendar Items A
CALENDAR through H be approved, Woods seconded. Motion
carried.
MINUTES ( CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM 5A
Approval of Minutes. APPROVAL of the minutes of
the regular Council meeting of December 16 , 1985 .
HEALTH & ( CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM 5E )
SANITATION 1983 Sanitary Sewer Improvements - Phase II.
ACCEPT as complete the contract with Universal
Utility Contractors, Inc. for construction of the
1983 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Phase II and re-
lease of the retainage after receipt of the necessary
releases from the State.
STREETS (CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM 5F)
LID 321 - 104th Avenue S.E. Street Improvements -
Resolution. ADOPTION of Resolution 1088 setting
February 3 as the hearing date on formation of
LID 321 .
- 1 -
January 6 , 1986
STREETS (CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM 5H)
Y High-
way Proposed LID 320 - James Street - West Valle Hi h-
way to Russell Road - Escrow Agreement. AUTHOR-
IZATION for Mayor to sign escrow agreement for
proposed LID 320 guaranteeing payment of assess-
ment by property owner.
76th Avenue South Condemnation - Ordinance. As
recommended by the Public Works Department, this
ordinance provides for the condemnation of property
necessary for the improvement of 76th Avenue South
from South 212th Street, a distance of approxi-
mately 1600 feet. Negotiations with the property
owners have not resulted in a settlement. Nego-
tiations may continue during the course of the
condemnation proceedings. JOHNSON MOVED to adopt
Ordinance 2601 entitled: AN ORDINANCE of the City
of Kent, Washington, providing for the laying off,
opening and widening of portions of 76th Avenue
South from South 212th Street southerly for a
distance of 1600 . 00 feet, more or less , in the
City of Kent. ( 76th Avenue South Improvements . )
Woods seconded and the motion carried.
WATER ( CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM 5G)
Clark Springs. AUTHORIZATION to transfer $46 , 000
from Unencumbered Fund in the Water Utility to
the Clark Springs project fund for restoration
of a flow capacity of the Clark Springs Trans-
mission Main as recommended by the Public Works
Director.
CBD LID 313 - CBD Improvements. This date has been
IMPROVEMENTS set for the public hearing on the final assess-
ment roll for LID 313 , for which the City Clerk
has given proper legal notice. Wickstrom' s memo
dated January 2 , 1986 , which was distributed with
the agenda packet, was accepted as part of the
record on Woods ' motion, seconded by White. The
Clerk noted receipt of a letter of protest from
Patricia Crockett, owner of the Creamery, a copy
of which was distributed to the Council tonight.
The letter was filed for the record.
Wickstrom described the project, as outlined in
the seven page memo. It was noted that the LID
was created on October 17 , 1983 by Ordinance 2430 ,
with protests totaling only 410 of the proposed
2 -
January 6 , 1986
CBD assessments. He noted that due to the uniqueness
IMPROVEMENTS of this project , this hearing is being held before
the award of the bid. The ordinance confirming
the final roll should be passed by the January 21
Council meeting, as the bid could be withdrawn on
February 15.
The project consists of the following items:
1. The existing planters on Meeker Street will be made permanent
including pavement removal , replanting the plants, and new curb and
gutter to define the planters. The configuration will change to some
degree.
2. The planter at 4th and Meeker will be redone completely with all new
landscaping. Within the planter will be four sign posts with
cantilever arms. Letters spelling "KENT" will hang from each arm.
Also the trellis, kiosk and benches will be located in the planter
area below the signs.
3. A single gateway sign, the same as described for 4th/Meeker, will be
installed at 1st/Meeker and lst/Titus in the northeast corner of the
intersections.
4. Fourteen historical street lights will be installed on 1st Avenue
between Gowe and Titus Street. The existing lighting will be removed.
5. A concrete crosswalk will be installed on 4th Avenue on the east side
across Meeker Street. The concrete surface will have a square
scoring pattern. The sidewalk at each end of the crosswalk will also
be redone with the scoring pattern.
6. Eight street trees will be placed on the east side of 1st Avenue
between Gowe Street and the City park at Titus Street.
7. The sidewalk will be rebuilt along the City park on lst Avenue
between Gowe and Meeker Street. A canopy will be constructed over
the sidewalks. Landscaping will be placed along the canopy.
8. Pylon signs will be placed at four locations within the CBD to give
parking and merchant information.
Two tall signs: Indicates parking and shows map of CBD businesses
with number-keyed merchant listing.
One each in the two City parking lots.
Two small signs: Same as the tall except no map or merchant
listings. Has directional arrows to City parking
lots.
One at N.W. corner of 2nd/Gowe
One at N.E. corner of 4th/Titus
g. newl be Several catchwbasinse o will bej
ust east
installed
on Meeker Street because of the curb revisions.
10. Gowe Street and Meeker Street will receive an asphalt overlay.
11. Under separate contract and funding, the street lighting on Meeker
Street will be fixture. Lights ewill ealso tben placed ew ewhere scurrently s poles nMissi d modern light
Missing-
3 -
January 6 , 1986
CBD Wickstrom noted that the assessments total $440, 509. 8_
IMPROVEMENTS and explained the City ' s participation as follows :
City Costs
The City will be funding the balance of the project cost:
Total Estimated Cost $773,470.59
L.I.D. Total $440,509.89
Total City Cost $332,960.70
Current Budget 264,000.00
Potential Over run $ 68,960.70
(paid by City)
The total estimated cost includes a contingency amount of $61,756.67. If
the contingency fund is not needed, the over run would be reduced to $7,204.03.
However, assuming the worst case, it is recommended to cover the costs as
follows:
1. Delete City engineering time. Current amount: $19,030.08
(Also do not charge future City construction engineering)
2. from Drainage Utility 49,930,62
(towards drainage system) TOTAL $68,960.70
Wickstrom explained the ten year payment plan
for assessments , noting that the interest would be
at the current rates. He pointed out that one
property owner had already filed bankruptcy, and
some decision would have to be made as to how to
handle the $44 , 492 . 74 involved. Upon Paul Morford ' s
question, Wickstrom clarified that it had always
been anticipated that some funds from the Drainage
Utility would be used for overall city improvements ,
and in this project , $49 , 930. 62 would be used
toward the drainage system.
Upon Bill Stewart ' s question, Wickstrom estimated
that the project could start in early March and be
completed in July. Patricia Crockett noted that
the notice of the hearing was received on December
20 , 1985 and that this did not allow sufficient
time to have the property appraised, in an effort
to show the value of the property both before
and after the improvements. It was determined
for Woods and White that Crockett had protested
the formation of the LID in 1983 . Wickstrom noted
that the proposed assessments had not changed since
1983 and that the appraisals could have been done
during the two year interim. On Biteman' s question,
DiJulio noted that on an LID assessment appeal ,
the court is bound to consider only evidence
brought before the Council and that there would be
no opportunity for new or different evidence at the
- 4 -
i
I
i
January 6 , 1986
CBD appeal stage. There were no further comments
IMPROVEMENTS from the audience and WOODS MOVED to close the
public hearing. Johnson seconded and the motion
carried. WOODS MOVED that the City Attorney be
directed to prepare the ordinance confirming the
final assessment roll for LID 313 , Johnson seconded.
Motion carried. JOHNSON MOVED that $49 , 930. 62
be transferred from unencumbered funds of drainage
utility to this project. Biteman seconded. Motion
carried. JOHNSON MOVED that Council recognizes
potential for additional City liability in the
amount of $44, 492 . 74 related to assessments on
properties in the L. I . D. which are in bankruptcy
and Council accepts such financial responsibility
upon exhausting all other avenues of collection.
Biteman seconded and the motion carried.
MIDWAY LANDFILL Temporary Permit - Methane Extraction Well at
Fire Station #73. On December 23 , 1985, a Washing-
ton State Department of Ecology engineer met with
City representatives concerning the need for the
DOE to respond to an emergency methane condition
1 f Kent Fire Department
existing in the vicinity o p
Station No. 73 located at 3536 S. 252nd Street.
Following a review of the conditions which are the
apparent result of methane migration from the
Midway Landfill , the affected departments con-
cluded that an interim authorization for access
would be appropriate subject to future conditions
and restrictions that may be imposed upon the pro-
posed methane gas extraction well by the Kent City
Council .
Upon the recommendation of the City Attorney,
BAILEY MOVED to authorize the Fire Department to
issue the required temporary use permit. Woods
seconded and the motion carried. Biteman noted
j that another family had been moved from the York-
shire area. Upon Johnson' s question, Chief Angelo
noted that the extraction well would be located
on the northwest section of the lot.
Greg Wingard noted that there were questions
of concern such as the total amount of gas to be
released and the danger of fire or explosion.
It was pointed out that the memorandum from
Assistant City Attorney Bill Williamson listing
the terms and conditions for the permit and also
- 5 -
January 6 , 1986
MIDWAY LANDFILL containing pertinent questions has been distributed
to the Council and has been made a part of the
record.
FINANCE (CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM 5B )
Approval of Bills. APPROVAL of payment of the 1985
bills received through January 7, 1986 and 1986
bills received through January 9 , 1986 after audit-
ing by the Finance Committee at its meeting at 4 : 00
p.m. on January 15 , 1986 .
CITY HALL (CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM 5C)
Energy Modifications to City Hall. AUTHORIZATION
for the Mayor to sign a grant agreement with Puget
Sound Power and Light Company and to hire Control
Contractors , our heating and air conditioning
contractor, to proceed with the modifications
of our heating and cooling system.
PARKS (CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM 5D)
Kaibara Park Contract Completion. ACCEPTANCE of
the Kaibara Park, Phase 2 , contract with New
Ventures Nursery and Landscaping as complete and
AUTHORIZATION to release the retainage upon
receipt of the releases from the State.
ZONING CODE Proposed Amendment to the Zoning Code Tree Preserva-
tion Regulations. Upon direction of the Public
Works and Planning Committee the Planning Depart-
ment presented suggested amendments to the current
tree regulations to the Planning Commission. The
Commission held four workshops for discussion and
conducted a public hearing on November 26 , 1985.
The Commission ' s recommendations for changes to
Ordinance 2452 have been distributed to the Council
and have been made a part of the record. The Plan-
ning Department recommends that the City Attorney
be instructed to draft an ordinance to make the
changes.
Principal Planner Hansen explained the proposed
changes , noting that the existing ordinance applied
to undeveloped land but did not directly apply to
developed land. He rioted that some definitions had
been added. He clarified that the City ' s landscap-
ing regulations did not deal with existing trees.
He stated that the proposal did not consider the
type of tree, but that the Planning Department
- 6 -
January 6 , 1986
ZONING CODE tried to be flexible , with regard to the growth
pattern of particular types of trees. He pointed
out that the Department now has a landscape archi-
tect on the staff.
[goods noted that it had been six months since
the Public Works & Planning Committee had suggested
that the Planning Department review this item
and MOVED therefore that the matter be referred
again to the Committee. Johnson seconded. Bite-
man suggested that the Planning Committee, Depart-
ment and Commission had all considered this matter.
Upon Bailey ' s question, Hansen noted that the
Chamber had been invited to all meetings on this
subject and he further noted that Earth Enter-
prises had also had input . Johnson commented
that he didn ' t think that the original ordinance
had the teeth to cover what the city really wanted to protect standing trees when development occurs.
Hansen pointed out that the ordinance attempts
to recognize that development will occur and pro-
poses to avoid any unnecessary cutting of trees.
He noted that 500 trees had been clear-cut on an
East Hill development. Ile stated that enforcement
is limited to violations of the Zoning Code and the
penalties attached thereto. DiJulio confirmed this.
Bailey noted that the city had spent considerable
funds on trees for beautification and suggested
that the Planning Commission proposed revisions
should be supported. On Wood ' s question, Hansen
noted that the ordinance had been in effect since
1981 and this proposal would streamline the appli-
cation and administration processes and would try
to get the word out that. many stands of trees
throughout the city are worth saving , and in fact,
were a financial asset to a given development. He
determined that without Ordinance 2452 the city
would have had no recourse against a developer
who clear-cut a parcel .
Jim White stated he would support the motion but
that he did not support the original ordinance
inasmuch as the courts would have difficulty
enforcing it. Paul Morford and Jean Archer noted
that many meetings had been had on this subject
and that action should be taken tonight without
sending it to committee again. Greg Wingard
spoke in favor of the amendment to the ordinance.
Upon a question from Carl Ricketts, Hansen noted
7 -
January 6 , 1986
ZONING CODE that the elevation remained at 3 feet from the
ground, in the reference made to trees of seven-inch
caliper.
The motion to refer the proposed amendment to the
Public Works and Planning Committee FAILED, with
Woods, Johnson and White voting in favor, and
Bailey, Biteman and Houser voting against.
WHITE MOVED to direct the City Attorney to pre-
pare an ordinance to repeal the tree ordinance.
Biteman seconded and noted he would rather see
provision for a percentage of construction costs
allocated to landscaping. White pointed out
that the ordinance was unenforceable and difficult
to administer. Hansen noted that all portions
of the Zoning Code were difficult at the Court
level . Woods complimented the Planning Commission
on the work on the proposal and noted her concern
with repealing the ordinance. Barney Wilson
noted that clear- cutting a lot should increase
the storm drainage payment on that particular parcel.
Johnson noted that the ordinance did not have the
teeth required for enforcing. He opined that
developers would find that people wanted trees
near homes and would therefore provide this amenity.
Hansen determined for Lily Pottsmith that the ordi-
nance in question only affects undeveloped land.
White clarified that he was not opposed to trees,
that he thought common sense would be used and it
was unnecessary for government to legislate in
this issue. Biteman concurred and Paul Morford
stated that developers did use common sense, and
he favored repeal of the ordinance.
Carol Stoner noted that the ordinance should be
retained noting that it served several purposes
including beautification, providing erosion control
and providing a bird habitat.
White ' s motion to repeal Ordinance 2452 carried
with Woods and Bailey dissenting.
COUNCIL Special Meeting. Johnson suggested that a special
VACANCY meeting of the City Council be held and that after
the meeting is opened, an executive session be
called to review the qualifications of the candi-
dates for the vacant Council position. BAILEY MOVED
to call a special meeting of the City Council for
Tuesday, January 14 at 5 : 00 p.m. for this purpose.
Woods seconded and the motion carried.
- 8 -
i
January 6 , 1986
COUNCIL Public Safety Committee. Biteman noted that the
COMMITTEES Public Safety Committee would meet on January 9 at
4 : 00 p.m. in the second floor conference room.
He noted that the Committee was short two members
and appointments should be made .
EXECUTIVE At 8 : 50 p.m. an executive session was called to
SESSION discuss a legal matter and a matter pertaining
to real estate.
ADJOURNMENT The Council reconvened in open session at 9: 14 p.m.
and the meeting was adjourned.
f
Marie Jensen, CMC
City Clerk
9 -