HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Meeting - Council - Minutes - 02/21/1984 KENT, WASHINGTON
February 21, 1984
Regular meeting of the Kent City Council was called to order at 7:00 o'clock
p. m. by Mayor Hogan. Present: Mayor Hogan, Councilmembers Biteman, Johnson,
Kelleher, Leahy and White, City Administrator Cushing, City Attorney DiJulio,
Planning Director Harris, Public Works Director Wickstrom, and Finance
Director McCarthy. Council.members Bailey and Woods were absent. Also pre-
sent: Personnel Director Webby and Parks Director Wilson. Approximately
75 people were in attendance at the meeting.
CONSENT J. JOHNSON MOVED to approve Consent Calendar
CALENDAR Items A through M, with the exception of Item
D, which was removed at the request of Kelleher,
and Item H, which was removed at the request of
White. Biteman seconded. Motion carried.
MINUTES (CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM 5A)
Approval of Minutes. APPROVAL of the minutes
of the regular Council meeting of February 6 ,
1984 and the minutes of the Special Council
Public Hearing held February 8 , 1984 at Totem
Junior High School .
COUNCIL (CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM 5D)
(REMOVED AT THE REQUEST OF COUNCILMEMBER KELLEHER)
Council Procedures. A resolution has been pre-
pared setting forth the procedure governing
City Council meetings . Kelleher noted that he
had submitted a copy of some proposed changes
to the Resolution. He MOVED to have this item
delayed for one month, Biteman seconded. Motion
carried.
HEALTH & (CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM 5K)
SANITATION Sewer Franchise Boundary Amendment. ADOPTION
of Resolution No. 1009 amending the sewer franchise
boundary to include a parcel in the vicinity of
104th Avenue S.E. and S.E. 224th as approved on
February 6 , 1984 .
LID 315 ( 74th Avenue S. and S. 259th Streets
Utility Extensions. This date has been set for
the public hearing on the formation of Local
Improvement District No. 315 ( 74th Avenue S. and
S. 259th Street Utility Improvements. The City Clerk
- 1 -
February 21, 1984
HEALTH & has given the proper notice to the property owners.
SANITATION Public Works Director Wickstrom described the project,
noting that this area is zoned M-2 and the proposed
LID includes full improvement of streets, including
sanitary sewers, water mains, storm drains, storm reten-
tion facilities, sidewalks on one side and street light-
ing. Also included is a new intersection with SR 516
located just east of the SR 167 interchange. He noted
that this included the Foster Plat approved some time
ago. The actual LID amount is $1,133,293 and the final
Declaration of Non-Significance on the Environmental
Impact Statement has been received. Wickstrom noted
that due to the magnitude of the project LID guarantees
and escrow contracts will be executed by the owners
of the Foster Industrial Park property prior to passage
of the Ordinance to form the the LID. City funds are
involved for oversizing the storm drainage system. It
is anticipated that if approved the project would be
completed in October, 1984.
The public hearing was declared open by Mayor Hogan.
No correspondence has been received. Bob Scholles
stated his firm had been consultants for the Foster
Plat approval and he spoke in favor of the project.
There were no further comments and BITEMAN MOVED to
close the public hearing, J. Johnson seconded. The
motion carried. KELLEHER MOVED to direct the City
Attorney to prepare the Ordinance to create LID 315,
Biteman seconded, and the motion carried.
STREETS (CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM 5I)
Green River Bridge Agreement. AUTHORIZATION for the
Mayor to sign an agreement with King County for Kent's
participation in the rebuild of the Green River Bridge
on South Central and also to establish a fund
therefor in the amount of $42 , 500 . The monies
shall come from a transfer of anticipated
unencumbered funds of the S. 180th Street
Improvement Project Fund. The Public Works
Committee has referred this matter to the
Council for action and the Public Works Director
recommends approval.
(CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM 5J)
South 212th Street Interchange Agreement.
AUTHORIZATION for the Mayor to sign an agree-
ment with the State for returning to Kent a
strip of land adjacent to S. 212th for main-
tenance after construction of the S. 212th
- 2 -
February 21, 1984
STREETS and Valley Freeway Interchange project, as
recommended by the Public Works Director and
concurred with by the Public Works Committee.
( CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM 5H)
(REMOVED AT THE REQUEST OF COUNCILMEMBER WHITE)
Comprehensive Street Maintenance Program.
Upon White ' s question, Wickstrom explained
the services to be performed by Seattle Engi-
neering International , Inc. and it was determined
that this was not an authorization for a study.
WHITE MOVED to authorize the Mayor to sign an
agreement with Seattle Engineering International ,
Inc. for the Comprehensive Street Maintenance
Program, as recommended by the Public Works
Director and conccurred with by the Public
Works Committee.
WATER (CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM 5M)
Water Impoundment Reservoir Condemnation.
ADOPTION of Ordinance No. 2457 providing for
condemnation proceedings for parcels 6 , 10
and 11 of the Water Impoundment Reservoir Site.
WEST HILL Mayor Hogan noted that the following letters
PLAN had been distributed to the Council , but had
not yet been officially filed for the record:
Letter from Nancy Rudy, received February 13
Letter from Lillie Pottsmith, received
February 13
Letter from Gene Olsen, received February 21
J. JOHNSON MOVED to file the letters for the
record, Leahy seconded. Motion carried.
Mayor Hogan pointed out that a memo had been
received tonight from Planning Director Harris,
noting that the west Hill Plan will be discussed
at the Council workshop of February 27 , 1984 .
At that meeting, future dates should be set for
consideration of the plan.
POLICE (CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM 5G)
Jail Site Acquisition. AUTHORIZATION for the
execution of the necessary documents to complete
acquisition of the Myrtle Elliott property.
3 -
February 21, 1984
POLICE (CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM 5C)
Police Department Safety Program. APPROVAL
of the acceptance of a $400 donation from
City Beverages to promote the Police Department
Safety Education Program.
FIRE (CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM 5E)
Contract with Fire District 37 (Fire Inspection) .
AUTHORIZATION for the Mayor to sign an agreement
with King County Fire District 37 whereby the
City of Kent will perform inspections within
the boundaries of Fire District 37 in accordance
with the terms and provisions of the Uniform
Fire Code. This matter was discussed at the
February 13 workshop.
(CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM 5F)
Fire Code - Sprinkler System Review. ADOPTION
of Ordinance No. 2456 amending Ordinance No.
2434 (Chapter 13 . 02 . 040 of the Kent City Code)
providing that all automatic sprinkler systems
designed with 50 or more heads be submitted for
review by an approved agency for compliance
with the current adopted fire codes. This was
presented at the February 13 workshop.
HEARING The Mayor noted that a public hearing is scheduled
EXAMINER/ for this meeting on utilizing the Hearing
BOARD OF Examiner ' s office for the Board of Adjustment
ADJUSTMENT functions. The matter was discussed at the
workshop of January 23 and a memo from the
�ity Attorney has been distributed. The Mayor
noted that administration had made a recommenda-
tion regarding the proposal and that the Chamber
of Commerce had also made a study of the matter.
Glen Votaw of the Chamber of Commerce said that
the Chamber was in favor of maintaining the present
system. He noted that the permit process might
be expedited with the exception of those cases
where both variances and conditional use permits
were required for one project. He stated that
this doesn' t occur often enough and would not
justify elimination of the citizen committee.
Votaw noted that it was also felt that the
Board of Adjustment provides a source for local
citizen participation in shaping the City.
It was noted that some cases may require more
legal interpretation but that ready access to
an attorney would facilitate the Board' s
decisions .
4 -
February 21 , 1984
HEARING The public hearing was opened by Mayor Hogan.
EXAMINER/ Steve Dowell, Christi Houser , Walter Flue and
BOARD OF Beth Carroll were present, all Board of Adjust-
ADJUSTMENT ment members.
Dowell pointed out that it was important to have
citizen involvement, referring specifically to
comprehensive plans . He opined that the Board
does give that involvement and concluded that
he would like to see the Board continued.
Houser, Flue and Carroll concurred, and all noted
the importance of giving service to the community.
Mayor Hogan noted that Phyllis Mauritsen who is
also a member of the Board was unable to be in
attendance tonight but that she had already made
her comments on the subject at a workshop meeting.
The Clerk noted that no correspondence had been
received on the matter.
Mayor Hogan clarified that the purpose of the .
memo to the Council regarding the issue was to
provide the most efficient and objective review
of issues that come before the Board of Adjust-
ment and suggested that the members of the Board
had accomplished that over the years. She pointed
out that utilizing the Hearing Examiner might
possibly give a more objective view and also
that the Examiner had been trained in addressing
the pertinent issues. She opined that this would
be a very efficient operation and noted that the
current Board members could be placed as volun-
teers on any number of Boards which need citizen
input.
J. JOHNSON MOVED that the public hearing be closed,
Leahy seconded. Motion carried.
Leahy noted that he agreed that citizen partici-
pation was vitally important and should always
be encouraged. He pointed out that as the Mayor
had suggested/ there are many ways by which
citizens can provide community input. He referred
to the complexity of the land use issues because
of the City' s growth, stating that this has put
the Board of Adjustment in the unfair position
of having to sit in a quasi-judicial capacity,
sometimes without enough professional background
in land use issues to properly address the issues
in the most expeditious and most accurate manner.
He clarified that he favored eliminating the
Board of Adjustment in order to streamline the
entire process and to preserve some of the City' s
interests as well . Jim White noted that while
he agreed with Leahy that sometimes the Board
- 5 -
February 21, 1984
HEARING of Adjustment deals with legal matters , he was
EXAMINER/ in favor of retaining the Board and of giving
BOARD OF new members training and orientation. He suggested
ADJUSTMENT that the Board of Adjustment have access to
legal counsel to enable them to be better advised
so as to avoid problems . Biteman stated that
opportunity for similar formal structure exists
in both the Hearing Examiner process and in the
Board of Adjustment process. He pointed out that
through the Board of Adjustment we receive the
combined experience and benefit from five members
operating in the same fashion as the Hearing
Examiner. Rather than one well-qualified judge,
he felt that the five member Board of Adjustment
should be maintained. He also suggested that
if it was deemed necessary, the City should pro-
vide the necessary training.
DiJulio determined that no action was required
if the Board was to continue as in the past.
No action was taken by the Council.
KING COUNTY Mayor Hogan noted that the Chamber of Commerce
ECONOMIC had forwarded the resume ' of Milton H. Douglas
ENTERPRISE and recommended that it be submitted for consid-
CORPORATION eration as a board member on the King County
Economic Enterprise Corporation. BITEMAN MOVED
to support the Chamber' s recommendation and to
submit the resume' . White seconded. Motion
carried.
PARKS Municipal Golf Course. Barney Wilson distributed
PROPERTY a memo and a proposed ordinance approving the
ACQUISITION purchase of property adjacent to the Municipal
golf course for the purpose of enlarging the course.
Kelleher stated that he thought that approval
had been given at the February 6 meeting. He
pointed out that at that meeting he had asked
for a delay until the City ' s capital improvement
needs and revenue sources could be reviewed,
and that Wilson had stated that such delay would
cost money. It was determined that the purchase
agreement had been signed but that the ordinance
was required to confirm the agreement. Cushing
noted that the capital improvement needs would
be available at the next workshop.
JOHNSON MOVED to adopt Ordinance No. 2458 ,
approving the purchase of the real estate, and
Leahy seconded. Johnson, Leahy, and White voted
- 6 -
February 21 , 1984
PARKS in favor, Biteman opposed and Kelleher abstained,
PROPERTY and the motion did not pass. DiJulio explained
ACQUISITION that passage of an ordinance required affirma-
tive votes of the majority of the entire Council.
He noted further that the purchase agreement re-
quires approval within 10 days and although the
Administrator had signed, it would not be valid
without the ordinance. JOHNSON MOVED for a
fifteen minute recess. Leahy seconded. Motion
carried.
Upon reconvening, JOHNSON MOVED to adopt
Ordinance No. 2458 and Leahy seconded. Kelleher
stated he still had the same concerns and that
he was not comfortable voting on this measure
without the information he had requested. He
stated he wanted to compare the overall capital
plans with the revenues. He noted that since the
Council had gone on record in favor of this pur-
chase by a majority, he would vote in favor of
the motion. Biteman pointed out that he had
opposed this purchase from the start because of
insufficient information regarding the financing
of the purchase and the loss of revenue involved
by taking this property off the tax rolls. The
motion carried with Biteman voting against it.
PARKS Saturday Market. Wilson distributed a memo
regarding the Saturday Market. He noted that he
had assigned market activities to the Kent Commons ,
had hired a new market co-ordinator and had applied
for State funding for an assistant. He proposed
that the market be moved to 2nd Avenue
between Meeker and Smith, and that the entertain-
ment would be staged near Meeker where it should
serve to connect the downtown business section
with the market activities. He requested permis-
sion to use this location on Saturdays from May
5th through October 13th from 8: 00 a.m. to 5: 00
p.m. He noted that the vendors were interested
in participating in Cornucopia Days , so the dates
of Friday, July 13 , and Sunday, July 15, would be
included for market activities . Wilson noted that
those Saturday market vendors participating in the
Cornucopia events would get a special package
for fees. BITEMAN MOVED to approve Wilson' s
request and Leahy seconded. Upon Johnson' s ques-
tion, White noted that the Parks Committee had
discussed moving the market to the parking lot.
Wilson stated he had met with the downtown mer-
chants but had not met with the "Friends of the
7 -
February 21 , 1984
PARKS Market. He stated that not everyone was in
agreement with this location. Upon White' s
question about the merchants , Wilson stated
that Les Thomas of Blessings had some concerns
about the location. Biteman favored the new
location as having better access to ample
parking. The motion carried.
TRANSPORTATION This date has been set for the continuation of
PLAN. the public hearing on the Transportation Plan.
At the Februrary 6th Council meeting the goals
and policies for the Transportation Plan and
the Arterial Plan were reviewed. Councilmembers
asked for clarification of several points per-
taining to the arterial plan and these were dis-
cussed at the workshop of February 13 . The public
hearing was reopened by the Mayor.
Jim Poston commented on the concerns expressed
regarding the proposed S. 224th corridor. He
clarified that the S curves on the Benson would
be improved. Regarding the environmental con-
cerns, he reported that the City' s consultant
had examined the area and had determined that the
road is feasible, but certainly would not be
cheap or easy to build. He noted that it was
true that the PSCOG model does assume that roads
will be built in accordance with land use, how-
ever, he noted that it would be irresponsible
for the City to take the position that we
would not build any roads until the congestion
was to the point that it was intolerable. Poston
noted that Mr. Baesman had prepared a model
showing that traffic will increase 33 %
in the next 15 to 20 years, whereas the Wilsey
and Ham model shows an increase of anywhere from
100 to 146 %, Poston clarified that no
model could predict traffic forecasts perfectly
but noted that the PSCOG model is used by other
agencies for economic and planning projections.
Poston explained that the City is attempting to
estimate the future traffic and at least start
the process for traffic improvement now. He noted
that if planning is deldyed, new corridors might
be impossible in the future because of develop-
ment which might occur.
- 8 -
February 21, 1984
TRANSPORTATION Mayor Hogan noted that copies of letters regard-
PLAN ing truck traffic restrictions had been furnished
to the Council . JOHNSON MOVED to file the letters
from Alaska Shipping, FAM Industries, and NAPA
Distribution for the record. Leahy seconded.
Motion carried. Mayor Hogan also noted that she
had received a call today from Metro Hauling ex-
pressing similar concerns.
Fritz Baesman, 10106 SE 224th Street, gave a pre-
sentation on behalf of the South 224th Street
Corridor Coalition. He noted that he had updated
his model and that his forecast to the year 2000
now shows a traffic increase of approximately 40%
instead of the 33% he had previously forecast.
He noted that his earlier figures were from
regression analysis and that he had used this
method because it was the method used by Wilsey
and Ham for their forecast. Baesman noted that
he had used Washington Population Growth Factors
and Kent Traffic Forecasts for the new model.
Based on population increase of 26-28% by the
year 2000, the corresponding traffic growth
would be approximately 65%. Baesman noted that
this was still a big difference from the 146%
that was estimated by Wilsey and Ham. He con-
cluded that the Wilsey and Ham figures assume
100% buildout of the available land by the year
2000 and that this was not realistic.
He stated also that the PSCOG model was good for
use for other types of planning such as location
of libraries, waterlines and so forth, but it
could not be used for predicting roads because of
the assumptions used. Baesman suggested that
realistic traffic forecasts showed that there is
no need for the proposed 224th arterial . He
pointed out that the coalition has demonstrated
that the 224th corridor is not a suitable location
for an arterial; referring to the seismic hazards,
the unique and fragile nature of the area and the
possibility of landslide hazards when vegetation
was removed. He noted that Poston had stated in
his letter to the Council dated February 10:
"environmental factors may cause unusual construc-
tion methods to be used, thus increasing the con-
struction cost. " Baesman stated that the cost of
I
9 -
February 21, 1984
TRANSPORTATION the 224th corridor could be three times the Wilsey
PLAN and Ham figure, pointing out that the State Depart-
ment of Transportation listed the cost of South
277th at $46 million but that Wilsey and Ham had
estimated it would cost $14 million. Baesman
stated that it appears that South 224th was chosen
as a proposed corridor simply because it was
located between James Street and South 208th
Street.
Connie Huzar, 22401 100th Avenue S.E. , filed a
report entitled "The Human Impact Factor in the
224th Corridor. She noted that her study took
statistics from five families for the past five
years, noting that these families were a cross
section of the people who live in the 224th
corridor. The study showed that the residents
were voters and participated in church, school
and community activities. She concluded that
the coalition members were in attendance, not
only becuase of the prospect of the street going
through but were there also to show their involve-
ment in all aspects of the community and to
show that they cared what happened.
Glen Votaw presented a letter from the Chamber of
Commerce. He noted that the Chamber had reviewed
the Transportation Plan, its goals and policies
and the arterial plan. He stated that they felt
that the City was taking the right step in develop-
ing this sort of plan. He noted that they agreed
with the goals and policies that have been set forth
with the recommendations
i'with only a few minor
additions which were significant to the language
but minor to the total project. Votaw stated that
the Chamber supported the proposed arterial plan
and that the planning portion of it was extremely
important.
Kelleher questioned Baesman with respect to his
analysis on the traffic forecast and need situation.
He noted that Baesman mentioned the fact that the
PSCOG model uses transportation costs and the avail-
ability of transportation as part of the input for
its projections. He noted also that Baesman sug-
gested a couple of alternate population forecasts,
one about 40o and one about 60%. He asked whether
- 10 -
February 21, 1984
TRANSPORTATION they were just talking about a difference in the
PLAN timing as to how long it will take before, we have
r
i
February 21, 1984
TRANSPORTATION John Truesdale of S.E. 224th, noted that the en -
PLAN tire plan did not have to be adopted and that
the proposal for S. 224th could be eliminated
and other desirable aspects retained. Upon Don
Bogard's question, Poston noted that this plan
was for major or arterial streets and that these
plans must be made before collector streets
could be laid out.
Daphne Hyde stated that it appeared that the
Wilsey and Ham recommendation was to have all
three of the proposed corridors approved. Upon
Kelleher's question on this, Poston stated that
using Wilsey and Ham predictions, if the 224th
corridor was not built, 208th and James Street
would each have to be widened to six lanes, and
perhaps the Benson would require six lanes in-
stead of four. He clarified that the arterial
plan could be modified in the future, before
actual building began. White noted that we
are asked to approve a program for roads to be
built in the county and asked who would fund
a study for the county roads. Poston noted
that inter -agency cooperation was proposed for
the county, Kent, Auburn and Renton. He noted
that the county was now doing a sub -area update
for this area and that some of our information
would be included in the county's update.
KELLEHER MOVED to continue the hearing to the
March 5 meeting, at which time a review will be
made of pedestrian, bicycle and truck elements,
White seconded. Motion carried.
KELLEHER MOVED that the goals and policies used
to develop the Transportation Plan be approved
and that the Arterial Plan developed therefrom
be approved with the understanding, however, that
the new east/west arterials noted therein be
considered only as study corridors which implies
their potential/but recognizes a need for addi-
tional joint agency study and concurrence. Bite -
man seconded. Leahy proposed to amend the motion
and some discussion ensued relating to the modi-
fications to the Goals and Policies suggested by
the Chamber of Commerce. Poston clarified for
Leahy that the motion would approve the Goals &
- 12 -
February 21, 1984
TRANSPORTATION Policies which guide the formation of the
PLAN Transportation Plan. The motion then carried
as stated.
COUNCIL Public Safety Committee. Biteman noted that
COMMITTEES the Public Safety Committee meeting scheduled
for Wednesday, February 22nd had been cancelled.
FINANCE (CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM 5L)
Request for Installment Payments - Charge -In -
Lieu of Assessment - Perkins. As recommended
by the Public Works Director and concurred with
by the Public Works Committee, AUTHORIZATION for
deferred payment of charge -in -lieu of assessment
for property owner at 10305 S.E. 267th for water
main connection in keeping with policy adopted
by Resolution No. 975.
(CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM 5B)
Approval of Bills. APPROVAL of payment of the
bills received through February 16, after audit-
ing by the Finance Committee at its meeting at
4:00 p.m. on February 29.
ADJOURNMENT JOHNSON MOVED to adjourn at 9:25 p.m., Leahy
seconded, motion carried. The Council then met
in executive session.
--
Marie JbFisen, CC
City Clerk
- 13 -