Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Meeting - Council - Minutes - 01/07/1974Kent, Washington January 7, 1974 Regular meeting,of the Kent City Council was called to order at 8:00 p.m. Present: Mayor Hog�Ln,.Councilpersons: Baff aro, Elliott, Johnson, Just, Kitto, Martell and Masters, City Administrator Street, City Attorney Mirk, Public Works Director Ulett, Planning Director Harris. Also present: City Treasurer Drotz, Planning Commission member Long. Finance Director Winkle was absent. ELLIOTT MOVED to approve the minutes of the meeting of December 17, 1973 as printed, Kitto seconded, motion carried.t HEALTH & 100th Avenue Sanitary Sewer Interceptor. A public hearing SANITATION has been -scheduled for this meeting on the Environmental Impact Assessment of the 100th Sanitary Sewer Interceptor. The Mayor declared the public'hearing open. Ulett stated that the project is located on 100th Avenue S.E. between S.E. 224th and S.E. 237th and noted that financing is to be 75% from Federal funding, 15% from State funding, and 10% is to be paid by the City sewer funds. Upon Jerry DeRouse's questions, Ulett stated that the line would be located near the center of 100th Avenue S.E. on the paved part of the street, and pointed out that it was to be expected that there would be some short curtailment of use of driveways during the construction period. Ulett determined for DeRouse and Walt Wade that there would be no assessments to these residents who live outside the City and they further questioned as to how much they would be charged for this line if they were annexed to the City. Ulett pointed out that since City funds would be involved in only 10% of the total cost, property owners would only be charged their share of the City's cost. He noted fur- ther that dollar amounts have not as yet been determined, as the total cost of the proposed project has not been determined. Ulett clarified that the proposed project is not a Local Improvement District, that the purpose of the project is not to serve property owners on 100th Avenue S.E. but is to relieve an overloaded City pump station and to allow further development in areas where sewers should be developed. He pointed out that sefvice on 100th Avenue S.E. is incidental, and service will be provided only if a property owner wantsit and asks for such service. Upon Jim Monroe's question Ulett noted that the City could not compel County residents to connect to the sewer. DeRouse opined that once the sewer was installed that the King County Health Department could inform the residents that their septic tanks were no longer adequate and thus force them to connect to the line. Upon Monroe's question, Ulett noted that the.Environmental Impact Assessment was complete insofar as the purposes of the City of Kent were concerned. Street explained that the Boundary Review Board has made it very clear that cities may no longer serve areas outside the.city limits with utilities. He pointed out that this hearing is to determine the impact of the project on the environment, which was deemed to be slight because the area will not be materially upset. Mr. Hart stated that their primary concern was that they would be required to connect to the line if annexed and that the cost would be confiscatory. Street pointed out that the City had no plans to annex the area, that such a proposal would have to come from the residents. He further advised that sometimes it is necessary for lines to be extended through unincorporated areas to reach incorporated areas. Ulett advised Mr. Lowry that this proposed line would serve the area from 104th S.E. to 112th S.E. from S.E. 240th to S.E. 224th and included the Park Orchard area which is served by the City although it is outside the City limits. `` 524 a HEALTH & DeRouse inquired as to how King County viewed the project. SANITATION Ulett informed him that this matter has been submitted to the Department of Health and to the King County Department of Planning. He noted that the King County Department of Public Works had issued a permit for the project. Ulett clarified for DeRouse that if the area were to be considered for annexation, a computation of the cost to the property owners would be made. DeRouse suggested that Kent's share of the cost would be $24,000 and Ulett noted that it could be higher or lower, pointing out further that not all of the cost is eligible for EPA grants. He pointed out that side sewer connections would be installed on 100th Avenue S,:E. because it is known that sometime in the future they will be used, and when connection is made reimbursement would be made to the City.because the side sewer connections were not included in the grants. DeRouse asked, that if annexed, would his cost be on a percent or on a footage basis. Street agreed with Ulett that at the present time we do not know what the cost of the project will be, and pointed out that charges would be based on the cost at the time of construction. He further stated that the Council would decide on the type of assessment and what each prop- ortionate share would be should the area be annexed to the City, but that such assessments were usually computed on a front foot basis. DeRouse asked if hook-up to the sewer would be mandatory if the area were annexed to the City. Street pointed out that if the Health Department determined that the septic tanks were inadequate, connection to the sewer would be necessary. He pointed out that both State and Federal government agencies are interested in replacing septic tanks with sewer lines because of the danger of pollution of ground water from septic tanks. A gentleman from the audience stated that he recognized that this project would give residents an opportunity to connect to a sewer but noted that the sewer might not be deep enough for some to connect. Ulett pointed out that the average depth was 12 ft. Richard Larson stated that the sewer lines would be an additional tax burden to the property owners and they would not be able to pay it. In answer to DeRouse's question, Ulett noted that the Department of Health had found that septic tanks failures were.found to be 50%. De Rouse opined that they would be as high as 68% in this area after the sewer line was installed. It was determined that the Department of Health had the authority to require connections to a sewer if available when a septic system was found to be faulty. Martell explained that his experience with the Health Department showed that they were very reluctant to condemn a house and they will try to do everything possible to keep the house from being vacated. DeRouse inquired as to the obligation of the City to property owners in case of annexation. Street informed him that the City must answer to the King County Health Department and if septic tanks in an area have failed, then the City must tell the property owner to connect to the sewer. Lawrence McFarland inquired as to whether or not a property owner could be charged for sewer service if he was unable, because of inadequate depth, to connect to the line. Street pointed out that if the property'is not being served by the sewer line that the property owner cannot be charged for that service. Street again stated that the entire hearing is concerned only with whether or not the City would be destroying the environment by installing the sewer line. He noted that the impact assessment had been sent to various State & - Federal agencies including the Department of Ecology and the Puget Sound Governmental Conference, and none had had any adverse comments. Monroe noted that although notice of this hearing was published in the Kent News Journal, many who did not subscribe to the paper had been unaware of the hearing. Monroe further inquired as to what the next step would be after the Council approves this impact assessment action. Ulett stated that under the Environmental HEALTH & Protection Act, three possible conclusions can be made: SANITATION 1) that the project is a major action with significant effects to the environment, which would require a com- plete draft impact statement, with a review period; 2) that this is a major action with insignificant effect; or 3) that this is a minor action with insignificant effect. He pointed out that a copy of the Council's finding is sent to the Department of Ecology. Monroe queried as to whether the Department of Ecology or ;King County approved or disapproved the project and was informed by Ulett that since 15% of the money is coming through the Department of Ecology they have to review the Council's action. DeRouse inquired as to whether it would make any difference if the people wrote to the Department of Ecology and was informed by Mirk that it would probably not make any difference since the Department of Ecology's only concern is on the environ- mental effect of the project. Upon'a question from the audience, the City Attorney pointed out that all contractors are required to have performance bonds to cover any damages which may occur. There were no further comments, and no correspondence on the matter. JUST MOVED to close the hearing, Elliott seconded, motion carried. KITTO MOVED that the effect of this project on the environment is insignificant and no further statement be made, Just seconded, motion carried, with Martell voting nay. HEALTH & Kent -Des Moines Sanitary Sewer Interceptor. The Mayor SANITATION opened the public hearing on the Environmental Impact Assessment of the Kent -Des Moines Sanitary Sewer Interceptor. A letter was read from the Washington Department of Fisheries noting that they do not anticipate any significant impact upon the State's fisheries resources and commending the City for initiating the project. MASTERS MOVED to make the letter a part of the record, Elliott seconded, motion carried. There were no comments from the audience and JUST MOVED to close the hearing, Elliott seconded, motion carried. MASTERS MOVED that the effect of this project on the environment is insignificant and no further statement was necessary, Elliott seconded, motion carried. Linda Heights Pump Station Improvements. The Mayor opened the public hearing on the Environmental Impact Assessment of the Linda Heights Pump Station Improvements. There were no comments from the audience and no correspondence regarding the improvements. ELLIOTT MOVED to close the hearing, Kitto seconded, motion carried. MARTELL MOVED that the effect of the Linda Heights Pump Station Improvements project on the environment is insignificant and that no further statement need be made, Kitto seconded, motion carried. Des Moines Sewer District. Upon the recommendation of the Department of Public Works, MARTELL MOVED to approve Des Moines Sewer District Resolution #1973-53, Masters seconded. Street explained that this improvement covered property West of I-5. Motion carried. Safety Awards. A letter was read from Pacific Northwest Pollution Control Agency, congratulating the Kent Sewer Department, for no lost time due to accidents in 1972. MASTERS MOVED to accept the letter, Just seconded, motion carried. Mayor Hogan presented the Zero Lost Time Accident Honor Award to Bob Kristofferson, Superintendent of the Sewer Department. FINANCE ELLIOTT MOVED to pay bills received on or before January 5, 19:74 after approval by the Finance Committee at its FINANCE meeting to be held Friday, January 11, 1974 at 8:00 a.m. It was noted that in accordance with State law, a second payment must be made after January 20, 1974 for all bills submitted by that date and chargeable to the 1:973 budget. Martell seconded, motion carried. POLICE & Aid Unit. A letter was read from Robert S. Johnson re - FIRE questing Council consideration and support for the Aid Units of the Fire Department. Enclosed also was a copy of Mr. Johnson's letter to the Kent News Journal in support of continuing the Aid Unit program. MASTERS MOVED to accept the letter and that it be referred to the Finance Committee, Elliott seconded, motion carried. A letter was read from Mr. and Mrs. August Tonelli expressing their appreciation to the men of the Aid Unit of the Kent Fire Department for their recent assistance during an emergency. MASTERS MOVED to accept the letter and that it be made a part of the record, Just seconded, motion carried. STREETS LID 274. MARTELL MOVED to approve Change Order #3 to City Transfer for furnishing and installing in place approximately.38 2" galvanized pipe mail box posts at a cost of $456.00. Upon Kitto's question, Martell explained that this item had been unforeseen. Street stated that they had anticipated'putting the mail boxes together but were unable to do so. Just seconded, motion carried. East Gowe - Titus Landscaping. KITTO MOVED to approve a contract for landscape design with SE&A in the amount of $2,000, Just seconded. Ulett explained that the King County Forward Thrust Design Commission had approved the landscaping of a large traffic island at E. Gowe and Titus Street at the Meridian Terrace Senior Citizen housing complex. The Commission had recommended the firm of SE&A, Inc. from the three landscape architects which the City had proposed. It was determined that SE&A, Inc. had been instructed by the Engineering Depart- ment to proceed with the landscape design in the amount of $2,000 without realizing that Council approval was necessary even though Forward Thrust funds were involved. Kitto withdrew his motion and Just concurred. JUST MOVED for the matter to be referred to the January 11 Finance Committee meeting, Elliott seconded, motion carried, with Baff aro voting nay. Christmas Tree Pick Up. It was noted that in years past a Street Department truck has picked'up Christmas trees and the matter has been brought to the Council's attention at this time with the information that the service would use approximately 80 gallons of gasoline and the Street Department's allotment for the whole month is 990 gallons. It was further determined that there would be sufficient gasoline for this project, if it does not become necessary to plow snow. JUST MOVED to direct the Administrator to have the Street Department pick up Christmas trees, Masters seconded. On a roll call vote, Johnson, Elliott, Baffaro and Kitto voted nay, Masters, Just and Martell voted aye. Motion failed. WATER Washington Futures Bond Money - Planning Loan. It was noted that the City has applied to the State for possible financing of five (5) water projects, as follows: 1) Chlorination facilities at Kent Springs 2) One million gallon standpipe on West Hill 3) West Hill pump station modification 4) Dual purpose East Hill pump station 5) 12-inch transmission main on 116th Avenue SE 'It was also noted that the Department of Social and Health Services has made the suggestion that the City make formal application for a $38,500 pre -construction engineering loan. The loan is without interest but must be paid back WATER in five years or when construction is started. Since the loan involves five projects, it is requested that permis- sion be granted to pay back the loans on the following schedule. lst year $5,000 2nd year $7,000 3rd year $9,000 4th year $9,000 5th year $8,500 or sooner, if construction occurs. BAFFARO MOVED that the Mayor be authorized to sign the loan application, Kitto seconded. Upon Kitto's query, Street explained that the Washington Futures Bond issue covers water systems within the City or State, and that the Bond issue was financed by the general funds of the State. The reason for obtaining the pre -construction engineering loan is to enable the City to have the plans ready so that if Federal funds become available the City would qualify. Street explained each project briefly and advised that the projects were listed in the order of their priority and that they are all projects which will have to be done in the future. He further pointed out that these projects are listed in the Comprehensive Water Report. Martell commented that the matter should have gone to the Utilities Committee and Street explained that the approval had to be filed by January 15, 1974 and had just been received. Upon Just's query as to where the money might be available from to repay this pre -con- struction engineering loan, Street stated that it would be from the Water Fund. Street pointed out that there is no assurance of -Federal funding on any of the projects but that the Federal government will not consider funding the projects until the pre -construction engineering work is done. Ulett clarified that Washington Futures grants were for construction only and the City would have to arrange to repay the pre -construction engineering loan. Motion carried. KENTWOOD A letter was read from Stuart D. Wattles of the Stuart INDUSTRIAL Land Company appealing the decision of December 18, 1973 PARK short plat committee meeting in regard to the property known as the Kentwood Industrial Park. Street suggested that'the letter be accepted and that the matter should be brought to the next workshop on Monday, January 14, and for a public hearing to be set for January 21. MASTERS SO MOVED, Just seconded, motion carried. STREET Supplements to TOPICS Agreements. It was noted that the LIGHTING State Highway Department has proposed Supplements to TOPICS agreements TG99 and TG100 for the financing of signal lights at the intersection of Meeker and West Valley and at 104th SE and SE 256th. Although the anticipated cost has risen, the City's share is less under the new formula proposed. MASTERS MOVED for the Mayor.to be authorized to sign the contracts with the State Highway Department for the two projects, Baffaro seconded. Kitto suggested that the agreements be reviewed by the City Attorney before they are signed. Masters and'Baffaro agreed to make this a part of the motion,• motion carried. ADDITIONS Fire Station #1 and City Warehouse. MARTELL MOVED TO CITY to accept the proposals of Bogard & Hewitt for architectural BUILDINGS services for Fire Station #1 and the City Shop building. Masters seconded. It was explained that the fee for the services for Fire Station #1 would be a lump sum of $1600 and would include three offices, a conference room, a work room and new entrance to the fire station. Services for the warehouse would cover the construction of an insulated and heating building approximately 30 by 36- feet to house trucks and approximately 50 stalls along the south property line of the City Shops facility. ADDITIONS Charges for this project would be 6�. of the contract amount, TO CITY with work done by the City to be excluded from the fee. BUILDINGS Motion carried. Upon Elliott's question, Street noted that completion of the third and fourth floors of the City Hall is scheduled for next year. PARKS Property Donation. The Park Board has requested acceptance of the proposed donation of Mr. and Mrs. Norman Anderson of a tract of land adjacent to Russell Road near the Green River, which has been appraised at $3,000. ELLIOTT SO MOVED, Masters seconded, motion carried. PLANNING A letter was read from, Lou Koszarek announcing his resigna- COMMISSION tion as a Planning Commission member. ELLIOTT MOVED to accept the letter of resignation with regret, and for a certificate of acknowledgment to be prepared, Masters seconded, motion carried. Street noted that the Mayor has not received any suggestions for a replacement for John MacGregor for the Civil Service Commission and suggested that appointment of a woman to either of these Commissions would be appropriate. BOARD OF A.letter was read from Hal Cline noting that his 4-year ADJUSTMENT term as a member of the Board of Adjustment had expired as of December 31,.1973, and requesting that he not be reappointed. MASTERS'MOVED to accept the letter, Just seconded, motion carried. The Mayor. noted suggestions for a replacement for Mr. Cline would be welcome. FIRE CODE The City Attorney introduced Ordinance No. 1856, adopting the 1973-74 National Fire Code, Volumes l through 10, replacing the 1971-72 issue. ELLIOTT MOVED for the adoption of Ord. 1856; .Jus't seconded, motion carried. BIDS Street Sweeping. Street Sweeping bids were received on January 4, 1974, as follows: Nate Pennachi - $6,84.45, incl. tax total mon4ly cost, and $18.95 per. hour for extra sweeping, incl. tax. Street noted,that Pennachi's bid was only slightly higher than his last year's bid and.recommended that it be accepted. JUST.MOVED to.accgpt Nate Pennachi's bid, Martell seconded, motion carried. UNIFORM The City Attorney introduced Ordinance No. 1855,, repealing BUILDING Ord. 1854, and adopting the 1973 Edition of the Uniform CODE Building Code.with certain additions and deletions. MARTELL MOVED to adopt Ord. 1855, Elliott seconded, motion carried. GASOLINE It was noted that King County has entered into a contract with Standard Oil to furnish„regular gas at 30G per gallon and 34c,' per gallon for premium. This is adjustable with the change in tank wagon price throughout the.year. It was noted by Street that the computation of gasoline used was based on 1973 figures, and that the City asked that 1972 figures be used because'of the reduction in gasoline consumption in 19.73.. The County has used the 197E figures because of the change in suppliers. He noted that it is expected that the City will receive the necessary gas for emergency vehicles but that we will probably have to cut other uses by 10%. Upon Just's question, Street stated that the price of gasoline had been 23� per gallon a year ago. BUDGET The Finance Committee has recommended the following changes in salary classification and/or job classifica- tion: :BUDGET; POLICE DEPARTMENT Police Chief 39E to 42E Police Captain 34E to 37E Police Lieutenant 33E to 3$E. Police Clerk to Admin. Secretary 11D/E to 12D/E FIRE DEPARTMENT Fire Chief 39E to 42E Deputy Chief 36E to 37E Assistant Chiefs (two) 34E to 35E PARKS DEPARTMENT Parks & Recreation Supervisor 40E to 42E Parks Foreman to Superintendent 26E to 32E Parks Clerk to Secretary/ Receptionist 3B/C to 7B/C PUBLIC WORKS Civil Engineer I to Prop Mgmt Spec 28,E to 31E Bookkeeper I to Bookkeeper II 10E _to 12E Engineering Aid II to III 20E to 22E Civil Eng II to Lisc. Surveyor 32E to 33E Main. Man II to Traffic Control Tech 20E to 22E Secretary to Admin. Secretary 1OC/D to 12C/D FINANCE DEPARTMENT Accountant I to Accounting Spec. 11D/E to 15D/f; PLANNING DEPARTMENT Planning Director 40E to-42E Assistant Planner to Assoc. Planner 30D/E to 34D/E ELLIOTT MOVED that the above changes be made effective January 1, 1974, Just seconded, motion carried. PERSONNEL A letter was read from James T. Hughes, Regional Director, U.S. Department of Labor, expressing appreciation to the City for their help and cooperation in Labor Department programs during the year 1973. MASTERS MOVED to accept the letter and for it to be made a part of the record, Just seconded, motion carried. NOISE It was noted that a letter had been received from the CONTROL Institute of Governmental Research pointing out that the Seattle City Council Public Hearing on Noise Con- trol would be carried on KCTS, Channel 9, Television on Monday, January 7, 1974, beginning at 8 p.m. FINANCE Bonds - LID 262 and LID 274. It was noted that letters of certification of the amounts of the unpaid assessments on LID 262 and LID 274 from the City Treasurer had been received. ELLIOTT MOVED to accept and record the letters, Kitto seconded, motion carried. The Clerk opened proposals for the combined LID 262/274 bond issue in the amount of $139,675.63, as follows: Wm. P. Harper & Son & Company - 6.60% interest rate Foster & Marshall, Inc. - 6.20% interest rate Upon the recommendation of Street, JUST MOVED that the best bid of Foster & Marshall, Inc. be accepted, Elliott seconded, motion carried. COUNCIL It was noted that this is the last official meeting for Councilmen Elliott and Martell and that Council- men.Thornton had completed his term on December 3, 1973. Street introduced Resolutions of Commendation No. 754, No.. 755, and No. 756, honoring retiring Councilmen Elliott, Thornton and Martell,respectively. BAFFARO MOVED to approve the Resolutions and for them to be signed by each Councilmen and Councilmen -Elect, Just seconded, motion carried. MEETING ADJOURNED: 10:00 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Marie Jensen Mayor Hogan City Clerk