The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCity Council Meeting - Council - Agenda - 03/06/2001 Cityof Kent City Meeting Agenda KENT W A S H I N G T O N Mayor Jim White Councilmembers Leona Orr, President Sandy Amodt Connie Epperly Tom Brotherton Judy Woods Tim Clark Rico Yingling March 6, 2001 Office of the City Clerk SUMMARY AGENDA KENT CITY COUNCIL MEETING KEN T March 6, 2001 WA5HINOTON Council Chambers 7 : 00 p.m. MAYOR: Jim White COUNCILMEMBERS : Leona Orr, President Sandy Amodt Tom Brotherton Tim Clark Connie Epperly Judy Woods Rico Yingling 1 . CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE L� 2 . ROLL CALL 3 . CHANGES TO AGENDA �S A. FROM COUNCIL, ADMINISTRATION, OR STAFF 6 B. FROM THE PUBLIC )0 + /! B 4 . PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS &Wd — �d2�l�gtita — A. Employee of the Month Q B. Ggg,vernment Finance Officers Association Award C . rr-oc — qbs. /n vu� 6le 1G'ds l ay 5 . PUBLIC HEARINGS / None 6 . CONSENT CALENDAR A. Minutes - Approval aka B. Bills - Approval j C. 2000 Annual Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Lff, Amendments - Ordinance (s) 2 ---� School Impact Fee Schedule - Ordinance 3 5U E.tv''' 277th Corridor Agreement - Authorize ce.01- F. Sound Transit Improvements Condemnation - Ordinance `>�47 G. Washington Avenue/Meeker St . Street Improvements Condemnation - Ordinance 3 H. Sale of Surplus Equipment - Authorize I . Alley Vacation Between 1st and 2nd Avenues and Smith and Temperance Streets - Ordinance u J DI ders.i-y 6aa�d / fpo!n4merii — GECnf; rh;.,A-io.4% 7 . OTHER BUSINESS A. Water Shortage Emergency Regulations - Ordinance 8 . BIDS None 9 . REPORTS FROM STANDING COMMITTEES AND STAFF 10 . REPORTS FROM SPECIAL COMMITTEES 11 . CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS �' .qn 0%rv%�c4r 12 EXECUTIVE SESSION A. Pending and Potential Litigation 13 . ADJOURNMENT NOTE; A copy of the full agenda packet is available for perusal in the City Clerk's Office and the Kent Library. An explanation of the agenda format is given on the back of this page. Any person requiring a disability accommodation should contact the City Clerk's Office in advance at(253) 856-5725. For TDD relay service call the Washington Telecommunications Relay Service at 1-800-833-6388. CHANGES TO THE AGENDA Citizens wishing to address the Council will, at this time, make known the subject of interest, so all may be properly heard. A) FROM COUNCIL, ADMINISTRATION, OR STAFF B) FROM THE PUBLIC PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS A) EMPLOYEE OF THE MONTH B) GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION AWARD CONSENT CALENDAR 6 . City Council Action: Councilmember 0411 moves, Councilmember seconds to approve Consent Calendar Items A through o!. , f Discussion U/Y►i v" Action 6A. Approval of Minutes . Approval of the minutes of the regular Council meeting of February 20, 2001 . .- 6B. Approval of Bills. Approval of payment of the bills received through February 15 and paid on February 15 after auditing by the Operations Committee on March 6, 2001 . Approval of checks issued for vouchers : Date Check Numbers Amount 2/15/01 508537-508765 $1, 015, 222 . 02 2/15/01 508766-509199 1 , 625 , 551 . 85 $2 , 640, 773 . 87 Approval of checks issued for payroll for February 1 through February 15 and paid on February 20, 2001 : Date Check Numbers Amount 2/20/01 Checks 249955-250273 $ 262 , 440 . 96 2/20/01 Advices 107518-108172 1 , 001 , 705 . 75 $1, 264, 146 . 71 Council Agenda Item No. 6 A-B Kent, Washington February 20 , 2001 The regular meeting of the Kent City Council was called to order at 7 : 00 p.m. by Mayor White . Councilmembers present : Brotherton, Clark, Epperly, Orr, and Woods . Others present : Chief Administrative Officer McFall, City Attorney Lubovich, Police Chief Crawford, Fire Chief Angelo, Deputy Assistant Chief Administrative Officer Martin, Public Works Director Wickstrom, and Planning Manager Satterstrom. Councilmembers Amodt and Yingling were excused from the meeting. Approximately 50 people were at the meeting. CHANGES TO THE AGENDA Consent Calendar Item 6Q was added at the request of Councilmember Orr, and Consent Calendar Item 6R was added at the Mayor' s request . FLAT SALUTE The Flag Salute was led by Boy Scout Troop 417 . PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Kent Arts Commission Re-Grant Presentation. Ronda Simons, Program Manager, and Mayor White presented Certificates of Appreciation to the following community arts organizations : Northwest Renaissance Poets, Performers & Publishers, Rainier Chorale, Rainier Symphony, Specialized Recreation Division of the City of Kent Parks Department, and Kent Senior Activity Center. Presentation of Military Outstandincr Volunteer Service Medal. Coast Guard Commanding Officer Chas Johnson noted that Petty Officer Walter Hazen has volunteered over 1700 hours to various downtown boards and com- mittees between 1992 and 2000 , and presented Hazen with the Military Outstanding Volunteer Service Medal . Officer Hazen expressed thanks to those on the boards and committees . CONSENT CALENDAR ORR MOVED to approve Consent Calendar Items A through R. Woods seconded and the motion carried. MINUTES (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 6A) Approval of Minutes. APPROVAL of the minutes of the regular Council meeting of February 6, 2001 . 1 Kent City Council Minutes February 20, 2001 HEALTH & SANITATION (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 6M) Hill Industrial Park Building 80C Bill of Sale. AUTHORIZATION to accept the Bill of Sale for Hill Industrial Park Building 80-C submitted by Hill Family L.L.C. for continuous operation and maintenance of 30 feet of watermain improvements and release of bonds after the expiration period, as recommended by the Public Works Director. The project is located at 18220 80th P1 S . SEWER (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 6N) Rodenhauser Sewer Extension Bill of Sale. AUTHORIZATION to accept the Bill of Sale for Rodenhauser Sewer Extension submitted by Darrel Rodenhauser for continuous operation and maintenance of 197 feet of sanitary sewer and release of bonds after the expiration period, as recommended by the Public Works Director. The project is located at 27251 121st Avenue SE. WATER (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 6F) South Kina County Regional Water Association Agreement. AUTHORIZATION for the Mayor to sign the South King County Regional Water Association Joint Operating Agreement upon concurrence of the language therein by the City Attorney and the Public Works Director and also, that the Public Works Director be authorized as the Association' s representative with the alternate being the Water Superintendent, as recommended by the Public Works Committee. (BIDS - ITEM 8B) Kent Sprinas Well. The bid opening for this project was held on February 16 , 2001 with four bids received, as follows : Arcadia Drilling $55, 586 . 91 Holt Drilling $62 , 190 . 88 Charon Drilling $76, 334 . 94 Hokkaido Drilling $87, 308 . 97 Engineer' s Estimate $77, 757 . 78 2 Kent City Council Minutes February 20 , 2001 WATER The Director of Public Works recommends award of the contract to Arcadia Drilling. CLARK MOVED that the Kent Springs Well contract be awarded to Arcadia Drilling, Inc . , in the amount of $55 , 586 . 91, including applicable sales tax. Epperly seconded and the motion carried. STREETS (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 6G) City of Tukwila. 180th Street Project. AUTHORIZATION to convey by quit claim deed an open space piece of pro- perty to Tukwila for their 180th Street project and to accept conveyance by Tukwila of property adjacent to the Springbook Creek Trail , as recommended by the Public Works Committee, and subject to review by the Public Works Director and City Attorney. SURPLUS PROPERTY (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 60) Surplus of 72nd Avenue Sicnal Shop. AUTHORIZATION to declare the Signal Shops building on 72nd Avenue South as surplus and to authorize the Public Works Director to dispose of the same, as recommended by the Public Works Committee . PLAT (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 6D) Emerald Ridge Final Plat (FSU-98-16/KIVA 2003728) . APPROVAL of the Emerald Ridge Final Subdivision with conditions and authorization for the Mayor to sign the final plat mylar. This final plat application was submitted by M.J.F. Holdings, Inc. dba Dream Craft Homes for the Emerald Ridge Final Subdivision. The Hearing Examiner issued the Findings with conditions on the preliminary plat on January 6, 1999 . 3 Kent City Council Minutes February 20, 2001 ZONING AMENDMENTS (OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 7A) Downtown Zonina Map and Text Amendments Chanaina DLM to DCE. The proposed ordinance rezones the Downtown Commercial Limited Manufacturing (DLM) zoning district to Downtown Commercial Enterprise (DCE) . The Land Use and Planning Board held a hearing on January 22 , 2001, and made a recommendation to rezone all properties which are presently zoned DLM to DCE in the downtown area. This ordinance implements the first of several recom- mendations of the Downtown Action Plan and Commuter Rail Station Area Study. It also makes minor technical amendments to the Zoning Code to change the reference from Planning Director to Planning Manager. Senior Planner Charlene Anderson displayed a map showing the area and noted that the DCE allows the mix of uses which is envisioned by the Commuter Rail Station Area Study and the Downtown Plan, and that the DLM district would be entirely eliminated from the Zoning Code . BROTHERTON MOVED to adopt Ordinance No. 3543 to eliminate the Downtown Commercial Limited Manufacturing (DLM) zoning district; to rezone all existing properties that are presently zoned DLM to Downtown Commercial Enterprise (DCE) ; and to make other related amendments to Title 15 of the Kent City Code. Woods seconded and the motion carried. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS (OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 7B) 2000 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendments. On January 16, 2001, the City Council sent the annual 2000 Comprehensive Plan amendments to the City Council Planning Committee for review. By ordinance, amendments to the Kent Comprehensive Plan are processed collec- tively once every year. Applications for seven plan amendments were received by September 1, 2000 ; two were withdrawn. The Land Use and Planning Board held a public hearing on November 27 , 2000 . The Planning Committee considered the amendments on February 5, 2001 and their recommendations are outlined in the staff memo. 4 Kent City Council Minutes February 20 , 2001 T COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS Senior Planner Charlene Anderson explained each of the following proposals and the recommendation for each: Proposal A - Kentview Pod H #CPA-2000-2 (A) /#CPZ-2000-1 - Table until Agricultural Lands Study is completed. Proposal B - Nguyen #CPA-2000-2 (B) /#CPZ-2000-2 - Approve land use designation of commercial and zoning designation of CC, Community Commercial Proposal C - Coblentz #CPA-2000-2 (C) /#CPZ-2000-3 - Approve land use designation of Low Density Multifamily and zoning designation of SR-8 Single Family Residential 8 dwelling units per acre Proposal D - Gray #CPA-2000-2 (D) /#CPZ-2000-4 - Withdrawn r^ Proposal E - Ranniger #CPA-2000-2 (E) /#CPZ-2000-5 - Withdrawn Proposal F - Kent and Federal Way School Districts #CPA-2000-2 (F) - Approval Capital Facilities Plan Proposal G - City of Kent Capital Facilities Plan #CPA-2000-2 (G) - Approval Capital Facilities Plan Amendment BROTHERTON MOVED to approve the Planning Committee ' s recommendation on the proposed 2000 Annual Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Amendments including tabling Kentview Pod H until an Agricultural Lands Policy update is completed, and to direct the City Attorney to prepare the necessary ordinance (s) . woods seconded. Dana Mower, DBM Consulting Engineers, 502 16th Street NE, Auburn, representing the applicant for Proposal C, noted that there was quite a bit of discussion before the Land Use Board regarding what is appropriate for 5 Kent City Council Minutes February 20, 2001 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS this property and asked the Council to consider allowing not just a low density multifamily designation on the Comp Plan, but allowing an MRG zone on the property. He said a townhouse zone is not appropriate on this site because of the high noise levels and the preponderance of multifamily in the area. Betty Coblentz, property owner and real estate agent/broker, 22320 88th Avenue South, said the noise level has been an issue since 1995 and that it is too high for a residential area. She said that she could not sell a townhouse in that area because of the noise and requested MRG zoning. Mower added that a noise study has been done and that there has been no opposition to his request from surrounding properties . Brotherton responded that the Land Use and Planning Board has looked at this, considered the noise issue, and discussed it thoroughly. His motion then carried. COUNCIL (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 6C) Excused Absence For Councilmember Yinalincr. APPROVAL of an excused absence from tonight ' s meeting for Councilmember Rico Yingling, who is unable to attend. (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 6Q) (ADDED AT THE REQUEST OF COUNCIL PRESIDENT ORR) Council Absence. Approval of an excused absence from tonight ' s meeting for Councilmember Amodt, who cannot attend. APPOINTMENTS (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 6R) (ADDED AT THE REQUEST OF MAYOR WHITE) Diversitiy Board. Confirmation of the Mayor ' s appoint- ment of Charlene Shaw to serve as a member of the Kent Diversity Advisory Board. Ms . Shaw is a long-time Kent resident and has been employed by King County for more than 20 years . She is very active with the Castlereagh Sister City Committee and currently serves as chair. She has been a volunteer with Hospice in Seattle and has also volunteered time at the Pediatric Interim Care Center. 6 Kent City Council Minutes February 20 , 20C1 APPOINTMENTS Ms . Shaw will replace Lawrence Lombard, who resigned, and her term will continue until 9/30/03 . CITY HALL MAINTENANCE (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 6E) Office Suprnly Contract. AUTHORIZATION for the Mayor to sign a three-year contract with Boise Cascade Corporation for the City' s office supply and furniture needs, as recommended by the Operations Committee at their February 6, 2001 meeting. Customer Service began the bid process in November, reviewed presentations, completed site visits and then selected Boise Cascade to provide office supplies and furniture. POLICE (BIDS - ITEM SA) Corrections Facility and Annex Modifications and Additions . This project includes upgrading the showers for ADA, adding office and conference room space, up- grading the fire alarm system, expanding the laundry room to accommodate large inmate population and adding a work release annex building. The low bid was submitted by M.J. Takasaki, Inc . , in the amount of $1, 353 , 000 . 00 , plus Washington State Sales Tax. WOODS MOVED for authorization to enter into an agreement with M.J. Takasaki, Inc . for the Corrections Facility and Annex Modifications and Additions Project in the amount of $1 , 353 , 000 . 00, plus Washington State Sales Tax. Epperly seconded and the motion carried. PARKS , RECREATION AND COMMUNITY SERVICES (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 6H) Millennium Art Project. AUTHORIZATION to execute an agreement with artist Laura Haddad for the Millennium Art Project in the amount of $73 , 000 . 00, as recommended by the Parks Director. The artist was chosen by public review and jury and approved by the Arts Commission. The art project will be displayed at the Kent Commons Recreation Center. 7 Kent City Council Minutes February 20 , 2001 PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY SERVICES (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 61) King County Arts Commission Performance Network Grant. ACCEPT the $5, 000 . 00 King County Arts Commission Performance Network Grant and amend the Kent Arts Commission Budget . Funds will be used to support artistic fees for two performances in the "Spotlight Series . " (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 6J) 2001 Washington State Artp Commission Overational Support Grant. ACCEPT the $6, 000 . 00 King County Arts Commission Operational Support Grant and amend the Kent Arts Commission budget . Funds will be used to support the production of the 15th Annual Kent Canterbury Faire. (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 6K) 2001 Ring County Arts Commission Sustained Support Grant. ACCEPT the $12, 000 . 00 King County Arts �. Commission Performance Network Grant and amend the Kent Arts Commission budget . Funds will be used to support programs such as Kent Kid' s Arts Day, Kent Summer Concert Series, Spotlight Series and Spring Into Art Performances . (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 6L) Fee In Lieu Of Funds . ACCEPT the fee in lieu of funds in the amount of $101, 906 . 89 and amend the budgets as listed below: Clark Lake Mordhorst Property Acquisition: $28 , 875 . 27 272nd St . Neighborhood Park Acquisition: $33 , 446 . 19 Turnkey Park Land Acquisition $ 8 , 700 . 00 E. Hill Youth Sports Complex $11, 700 .43 Acquisition/Development Morrill Meadows Park Development $19, 185 . 00 The City of Kent received a total of $101, 906 . 89 from ten subdivisions who voluntarily paid their fee-in-lieu- of, dedicating park land to mitigate the development of single family homes . 8 Kent City Council Minutes February 20 , 2001 PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY SERVICES (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 6P) Linda Heights Park Renovation Project. ACCEPT the Linda Heights Park Renovation Project as complete and authorize release of retainage funds to Fuji Industries, Inc. The project was inspected and accepted by the Project Manager on November 6, 2000 . FINANCE (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 6B) Approval of Bills. APPROVAL of payment of the bills received through January 16 and paid on January 16 ; as well as payment of bills received January 31 and paid on January 31 after auditing by the Operations Committee on February 6 , 2001 . Approval of checks issued for vouchers : Date Check Numbers Amount r 1/16101 507058-507248 $ 943 , 110 . 71 1/16101 507249-507670 1 , 785 , 290 . 10 $2 , 728, 400 . 81 Date Check Numbers Amount 1/31/01 507671-507914 $ 934 , 799 . 69 1/31/01 507915-508536 2 , 854 , 065 . 41 $3 , 788 , 865 . 10 Approval of checks issued for payroll of January 1 through January 15 and paid on January 19, 2001 : Date Check Numbers Amount 1/19/01 Checks 249229-249580 $ 320, 755 . 77 1/19/01 Advices 105853-106741 1 , 192 , 741 . 07 $1, 513 , 496 . 84 Approval of checks issued for the payroll of Teamsters contract settlement and paid on January 26, 2001 : Date Check Numbers Amount 1/26/01 Checks 249581-249633 $ 42, 382 .43 �- 1/26/01 Advices 106742-106812 61 , 242 . 69 $ 103 , 625 . 12 9 Kent City Council Minutes February 20, 2001 '1 FINANCE Approval of checks issued for the payroll of January 16 through January 31 and paid on February 5, 2001 : Date Check Numbers Amount 2/5/01 Checks 249634-249954 $ 259, 533 . 83 2/5/01 Advices 106813-107517 965 , 971 . 86 $1, 225 , 505 . 69 REPORTS Council President. Orr announced that the City Council has received an invitation from Yangzhou to a Friendship Cities Food Festival to be held in Yangzhou from September 15 - 18, 2001. Public Works Committee. Clark noted that the committee will hold a special meeting on Tuesday, February 27 , at 5 : 00 p.m. in the Council Chambers . Planning Committee. Brotherton noted that there will be a special meeting of the committee on February 27 at 4 : 00 p.m. and that urban separators will be discussed. Parks Committee. At Woods ' request, McFall noted that revenue at the Riverbend Golf Complex has increased $200 , 000 in 2000 over 1999, and that that does not include restaurant sales . He added that the number of rounds of play has increased on both courses, that expenses are down, and that the golf course is covering its costs and its debt service . He predicted that 2001 will be even better because of the restaurant income . ADJOURNMENT At 7 : 40 p.m. ORR MOVED to adjourn. Woods seconded and the motion carried. Brenda Ja be CMC City Cler 10 Kent City Council Meeting Date March 6 , 2001 Category Consent Calendar 1 . SUBJECT: 2000 ANNUAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ZONING MAP AMENDMENTS - ORDINANCE (S) 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Adoption of Ordinance No. relating to 2000 Comprehensive Plan Amendments CPA-2000-2 (B) , CPA-2000-2 (C) , CPA-2000-2 (F) , and CPA-2000-2 (G) ; and adoption of Ordinance No. relating to zoning map changes CPZ-2000-2 and CPA-2000-3 . These ordinances would: (1) amend the comprehensive plan' s land use map designations and zoning map designations of parcels of property more specifically identified in the ordinances; and (2) amend the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan (CPA-2000- 2 (G) ) . Item CPA-2000-2 (A) was tabled at the Council ' s February 20, 2000, meeting until the agricultural lands policy update is complete. 3 . EXHIBITS: Ordinances (2) and exhibits referenced therein 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Council (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 6C ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, amending the City of Kent Comprehensive Plan as follows: (1) to change the plan's land use map designation from Low Density Multifamily(LDMF)to Commercial (C) for property located at 12819 Kent-Kangley Road (CPA-2000-2(B)); (2) to change the plan's land use map designation from Industrial and Single-Family Residential, 6 units per acre (SF-6) to Low Density Multifamily(LDMF) for property located at South 222°d Street and 88d' Avenue South (CPA-2000-2(C)); (3) to amend the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan to include the Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent and Federal Way School Districts(CPA- 2000-2(F); and (4) to amend the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan to reflect a 6-year plan for capital facilities projects (CPA-2000-2(G)). WHEREAS, the Washington State Growth Management Act("GMA") requires internal consistency among comprehensive plan elements and the plans from other jurisdictions; and WHEREAS, to assure that comprehensive plans remain relevant and up to date, the GMA requires each jurisdiction to establish procedures whereby amendments to the plan are considered by the City Council(RCW 36.70A.130(2)), and limits these amendments to once each year unless an emergency exists; and WHEREAS,the City of Kent has established a procedure for amending the Comprehensive Plan in Chapter 12.02 of the Kent City Code, which sets a deadline of September 1st of each year for submittal of requests for comprehensive plan amendments; and 1 2000 Comprehensive Plan Amendments WHEREAS, by September 1, 2000, the City received applications to amend the comprehensive plan's land use plan map designation, and three of those applications involve parcels located at: (1) 21800 Frager Road and 22002 Riverview Boulevard(CPA-2000-2(A)); (2) 12819 Kent-Kangley Road (CPA-2000-2(B)); and (3) South 222"d Street and 88d' Avenue South(CPA-2000-2(C)); and WHEREAS, the parcel at 21800 Frager Road and 22002 Riverview Boulevard is currently designated Agricultural (A) and Single-Family Residential, 3 units per acre (SF-3), and the applicants are requesting a plan designation of Single Family Residential, 6 units per acre(SF-6) (CPA-2000-2(A)); and WHEREAS, the parcel at 12819 Kent-Kangley Road is currently designated Low Density Multifamily(LDMF), and the applicants are requesting a plan designation of Commercial(C) (CPA-2000-2(B)); and WHEREAS, the parcel at South 222°d Street and 88`h Avenue South is currently designated Industrial and Single-Family Residential, 6 units per acre(SF-6), and the applicants are requesting a plan designation of Low Density Multifamily (LDMF) (CPA-2000-2(C)); and WHEREAS, the Kent and Federal Way School Districts are requesting amendments to the text of the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan to reflect proposed changes to impact fees resulting from new student population generated by new single-family and multifamily residential development; and WHEREAS, the City of Kent Finance Department has submitted proposed amendments to the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan to identify a 6-year plan for capital facilities projects, including costs and revenue sources; and 2 2000 Comprehensive Plan Amendments "1 WHEREAS, the City of Kent Land Use and Planning Board considered the requested comprehensive plan amendments, conducted a public hearing of the same on November 27, 2000, and made the following recommendations: (1) the denial of CPA-2000-2(A), (2) the approval of CPA—2000-2(B) and CPA-2000-2(C), and(3) no recommendation for CPA-2000-2(F) and CPA-2000-2(G); WHEREAS,the Planning Committee further discussed the amendments at its February 5, 2001, meeting; and moved to recommend: (1) the tabling of the proposed comprehensive plan designation for CPA-2000-2(A) until the Agricultural Lands Study is complete; (2)the approval of the amendments of the comprehensive plan designations for CPA-2000-2(B) and CPA-2000-2(C); (3) the approval of the amendments to the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan regarding the incorporation of the Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent and Federal Way School Districts (CPA-2000-2(F)); and (4) the approval of the amendments to the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan to reflect a 6-year plan for capital facilities projects (CPA-2000-2(G)); and WHEREAS, the proposed amendments of CPA-2000-2(B), CPA-2000- 2(C), CPA-2000-2(F), and CPA-2000-2(G) are consistent with the standards of review for comprehensive plan amendments outlined in Section 12.02.050 of the Kent City Code; and WHEREAS,on February 20,2001, the City Council for the City of Kent approved the recommendation to table the proposed comprehensive plan designation for CPA-2000-2(A) until the Agricultural Lands Study is complete; and WHEREAS,on February 20, 2001,the City Council for the City of Kent approved the recommendation of the comprehensive plan amendment CPA-2000-2(B) to amend the comprehensive plan designation of a parcel of property at 12819 Kent- 3 2000 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Kangley Road from a plan designation of Low Density Multifamily (LDMF) to "1 Commercial (C); and WHEREAS, on February 20, 2001,the City Council for the City of Kent approved the recommendation of the comprehensive plan amendment CPA-2000-2(C) to amend the comprehensive plan designation of parcels of property at South 222nd Street and 88`h Avenue from a plan designation of Industrial and Single-Family Residential (SF-6) to a plan designation of Low Density Multifamily(LDMF); and WHEREAS,on February 20,2001,the City Council for the City of Kent approved the recommendation of the Capital Facilities Element amendment CPA-2000- 2(F) to include the Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent and Federal Way School Districts; and WHEREAS, on February 20,2001,the City Council for the City of Kent approved the recommendation of the Capital Facilities Element amendment CPA-2000- 2(G) to reflect a 6-year plan for capital facilities projects; NOW, THEREFORE, "1 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION]. The City of Kent Comprehensive Plan adopted by Ordinance No. 3222,as subsequently amended, is hereby amended to establish new plan designations for the following parcels: A. For the property located at 12819 Kent-Kangley Road,Kent, Washington, from a plan designation of Low Density Multifamily(LDMF)to Commercial (C), as depicted in the map attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference (CPA-2000-2(B)). B. For the property located at South 222nd Street and 88`h Avenue South, Kent, Washington, from a plan designation of Industrial and Single-Family Residential 4 2000 Comprehensive Plan Amendments "1 (SF-6) with six (6) dwelling units per acre to Low Density Multifamily Residential (LDMF), as depicted in the map attached hereto as Exhibit"A"and incorporated herein by this reference (CPA-2000-2(C)). SECTION 2. The Capital Facilities Plan element of the Kent Comprehensive Plan is hereby amended to include the Capital Facilities elements of the Kent and Federal Way School Districts, as set forth in Exhibit"B" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (CPA-2000-2(F). SECTION 3. The Capital Facilities Element of the City of Kent Comprehensive Plan is hereby amended to reflect a 6-year plan for capital facilities projects, as set forth in Exhibit "C" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (CPA-2000-2(G)). SECTION 4. -Severability. If anyone or more sections, sub-sections, or sentences of this Ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION S. -E ffective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect and be n force thirty(30) days from and after the date of passage as provided by law. JIM WHITE, MAYOR ATTEST: BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK 5 2000 Comprehensive Plan Amendments APPROVED AS TO FORM: ROGER A. LUBOVICH, CITY ATTORNEY PASSED day of , 2001. APPROVED day of , 2001. PUBLISHED day of , 2001. I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No. , passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the City of Kent as hereon indicated. (SEAL) BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK .� \c+�inOrdir \CorprWRnMOw-x000.auo 6 2000 Comprehensive Plan Amendments '� W O •� W C O V � � NCV to C m N Clc w � c a w tiZcn v (l) c9 a g zW N _ C � z m' Y E CL i i i ' LiM i Sol ' % I �` / �, r %0 4 ................ ... .................................... �,' ,' i i EXHIBIT"— l on in ?.1 0 d p m d L a 7 O C1 NN ' 4• N > J N o m v°3 O =dE � d : ' � vZ o so ad z `m •c c c to Y cJW Y i NCp _ co in O aas o 1 1 •�=.. Z Y ,41 werk 41 IF r lr S ll�8s, �_ .-ter `i •� .� ,,�.rL L -� ,S, -- CM Vr• � I am 1H U LE .. fir/' �v. `^�- ' �" 1' , i'1.". �e:+�E �.�•�.^— �,�� . ��/_� � -� � , r �Ili •� V \ � \\1:c., r u .rr �' 1 a \ L\ F S 1 _- :I _ ��m City of Kent, Washington 2001 - 2006 Preliminary Capital Facilities Plan 4000 KENT W A 5 H I N G T O N November 21, 2000 EmiB r b ""1 ", , 2001 - 2006 Capital Improvement Program Sources of Funds Amounts in 000's Street Fund Revenue Bonds- 14% Drainage 4% Councilmanic Bond Proceeds 20% Utility Funds 16% Capital Improvement Fund Public Safety Bonds 11% 21% Grants Alternative Funding 7% Sources-Parks 5% Other Funding Sources 2% I Recommend 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total Sources of Funds Capital Improvement Fund 3,111 2,735 2,672 2.885 2,794 2.770 16,967 Grants 2,275 438 1.400 595 4,355 1.242 10.305 Other Funding Sources 563 950 98 735 30 2,366 Alternative Funding Sources-Parks 2.645 633 1.512 1.240 1,228 536 7.794 Public Safety Bonds - 30,000 - 30,000 Councilmanic Bond Proceeds - 2,000 21,000 6,273 29,273 Street Fund 4,511 2,251 3,733 4.056 3,955 2,727 21,233 Revenue Bonds-Drainage 6,279 6,279 Utility Funds 5.658 3.931 3,854 3.623 3.712 3,435 24.213 Total Sources of Funds 18,763 42,938 13,269 39,678 16,779 17,013 148,430 1 CIO--st5 01.Xi5 11/21/tb "1 2001 - 2006 Capital Improvement Program Projects Forecast Amounts in 000's Public Safety 29% & Community Services '�' • 16% Transportation 20% =Y' i. General Govemment 11% Utility Fund Projects 24% i Recommend 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total Projects Transportation' 4,511 2,151 3,633 7,406 8,645 3,002 29,348 Public Safety 490 4,550 26.550 8,550 550 3,523 44,213 Parks,Recreation 8 Community Services 6,886 3,431 4,357 3,145 2,947 2,828 23,594 General Government ' 1,508 3,175 1,175 4,475 1,225 4,525 16,083 Utility Fund Projects• 5,358 3.631 3,564 14.202 5.312 3,135 35192 Total Projects 18,753 16,938 39,269 37,778 18,679 17,013 148,430 Includes reallocation(from General Gov't-Facilities)of cost of Maintenance Facility funded with councilmanic bonds repaid from Street,CIP and Utility Fund operating transfers 2 Capital Improvement Program for Yeats 2001 -2006 Recommend j 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total Sources of Funds ;Capital Improvement Fund 1,716 1,445 1,445 1.495 1.495 1495 9.091 CIP Fund-REET 2nd Qtr 1,445 1.290 1.227 1,390 1.299 1.275 7,926 Youth/Teen 250 100 65 - 415 Grants-Parks 2,275 438 1.400 395 300 867 5.675 Donations and Contributions 140 100 3 243 Other Funding Sources 13 750 30 30 823 Alternative Funding Sources-Parks 2,645 633 1,512 1.240 1,228 536 7,794 Public Safety Bonds - 30,000 30.000 Sewer Utility Fund 521 403 415 427 440 454 2.660 Drainage Utility Fund 3.962 1,886 1,184 1,562 1,625 1.070 11,289 Revenue Bonds-Drainage 6,279 6.279 Grants-Street - 200 4.055 375 4,630 LID&Mitigation Payments 100 - - 735 835 Street Fund 4,511 2,251 3,733 4.056 3,955 2.727 21,233 Councilmanic Bond Proceeds 2,000 21,000 - 6.273 29.273 Water Fund 1.175 1,642 2.255 1.634 1.647 1.911 10.264 Total Sources of Funds 18,753 42,938 13,269 39,678 16,779 17,013 148,430 Transportation Corridor Improvements Soo 500 2.000 2.000 1,000 6.000 Arterials 1,361 - 500 5,965 900 8,726 jratsecuon&Signal Improvements 1,150 275 250 250 250 650 2.825 r Improvements 1.500 1.376 1,383 4.656 1.430 1,452- 11.797 , cal Transportation 4,511 2,151 3,633 7,406 8,645 3,002 29,348 Public Safety Fire&Life Safety Requests 395 475 475 475 475 475 2,770 Police 95 75 75 8.075 75 75 8.470 Public Safety Facilities 4.000 26,000 2,973 32.973 (Total Public Safety 490 4,550 26,550 8,550 550 3,623 44,213 !Parks,Recreation &Community Services 6,886 3,431 4,357 3,146 2,947 2,828 23,594 General Government (General Government Facilities 337 350 350 3.650 400 3,700 8,787 Omer General Government 1.171 2.825 825 825 825 825 7,296 Total General Government 1,508 3,175 1,175 4,475 1,225 4,525 16,083 Utility Fund Projects Sanitary Sewer 421 303 315 1,952 340 354 3.685 Stormwater Drainage 3,862 1,786 1,084 7,466 3.425 970 18,593 Water Projects 1,075 1.542 2,155 4,784 1,547 1,811 12,914 Total Utility Fund Projects 5,353 3,631 3,554 14,202 5,312 3,135 35,192 Total All Projects 18,753 16,938 39,269 37,778 18,679 17,013 148,430 3 cw combined CIP requests 01 ids 1121= "-1 Transportation Capital Improvement Program for Years 2001 -2006• Recommend 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total Sources of Funds Grants 200 4.055 375 4.630 LID&Mitigation Payments 100 735 835 Street Fund 4.411 2,151 3.633 3.956 3.855 2.627 20.633 Total Sources of Funds 4,511 2,151 3,633 4,156 8,645 3.002 26,098 Corridor Improvements 228th Corridor- West Corridor 500 500 2,000 2.000 1.000 6.000 Arterials - Orillia Road Repair 100 - - 100 212th Street Rehab 300 300 132nd Ave Improvements(240th-244th) - 250 250 Washington Avenue Widening 300 - 300 72nd Avenue(180th-188th) 111 - 111 72nd Avenue(196th-200th) 250 500 750 84th Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation - 500 500 Pacific Hwy South HOV Lanes-Phase 11 300 4.965 - 5.265 Military Road Improvements - - 150 150 116th Ave Imp(256th-KK(SR516)) 500 500 Central Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation - 50o - 500 Intersection&Signal Improvements James&Central Intersection Improve 200 '- 200 208th&98th Intersection Improvements 100 - 100 WVH&277th Intersection Improvement - 250 250 Military&Reith Intersection Improvement-A 450 - - 450 94th Ave Q Canyon Dr Traffic Signal 400 a 400 1-5 &277th Intersection Improvement - 275 - 275 Military Rd&277th Intersection Improve - 650 650 116th&248th Signal - - 250 - 250 120th&248th Street Improvement - - - 250 - - 250 Other Improvements - Miscellaneous Asphalt Overlays 478 497 517 538 560 582 3,172 Slurry Seal Program 50 50 75 75 75 75 400 Sidewalk Rehabilitation and Installation 300 300 300 300 300 300 1.800 Street Lighting Wiring Upgrades 60 - - - 60 Traffic Signal Controller Cabinet Replacements 40 40 8o Neighborhood Traffic Control 75 75 75 75 75 75 450 Traffic Signal Energy Conservation 25 - - - - - 25 City Wide Guardrail&Safety Improvement 30 30 30 30 30 30 180 Bike Paths - 100 100 100 100 100 500 Commuter Shuttle Bus 45 45 45 45 45 45 270 Street Tree Maintenance Program 141 141 141 141 141 141 846 Street Striping Program 81 83 85 87 89 89 514 Pavement Rating Survey 15 15 15 15 15 15 90 Lincoln Avenue(Smith-James) 150 - - - - 150 Freight Mobility Study 10 10 Total Projects 4,511 2,151 3,633 4,156 8,645 3,002 26,098 4 Parks,Recreation and Community Services Capital Improvement Program for Years 2001 -2006 Recommend 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total Sources of Funds CiP-REET2ndOtr 1,445 1,290 1.227 1,390 1.299 1.275 7,926 Capital Improvement Fund 118 120 120 120 120 120 716 Grants 2,275 438 1,400 395 300 867 5,675 Youth/Teen Fund 250 100 65 - - - 415 Donations/Contributions 140 100 3 - 243 Other Funding Sources 13 750 30 - 30 823 Alternative Funding 2.645 633 1.512 1.240 1.228 536 7.794 Total Sources of Funds 6,886 3.431 4,357 3,145 2,947 2,828 23,594 Projects Risk Reduction&Safety Improvements 243 262 233 213 213 1,164 Light Pole Replacement 20 150 150 150 150 45 665 Emergency Park Repairs 25 30 30 35 35 155 Tennis/Basketball Court Re-surfacing 40 20 35 20 15 15 145 Trails/Parking Improvements 25 30 30 30 35 150 Service Club Ballfields 1,400' 800 2.200 Restroom Renovation 25 30 30 30 35 150 Lake meridian Park Improvements 100 210 - 310 Urban Forestry Plan Implementation-, 15 15 20 20 25 95 Grant Matching Funds 50 105 65 110 25 355 Architect/Engineering&Master Plans 10 25 30 30 35 35 165 Sign Replacement 10 10 10 10 15, 55 Downtown Sidewalk Replacement Enhancement 85 90 90 90 355 Golf Complex Projects 43 45 45 45 45 45 268 Soccer Field Renovation 800 300 1,100 Skate Park Development/Acquisition 400 400 Green River Disabled Fishing Access/Boeing Tr 300 300 Canterbury Park Development 238 - 238 Regional Trail System Planning 10 10 Lake Fenwick Park Development 75 75 Recreation Facility Feasibility Study 50 50 Botanical Garden 25 25 Mill Creek Trail Acquisition&Development 25 200 225 Big Blue Mobile Computer Lab 65 65 Spnngwood Park Improvements 40 25 65 132nd Street Park Development 750 750 Green River Corridor 25 - 25 Demolition of Rental Houses 25 - 25 East Hill Youth Sports Facility Development 600 1,100 1.700 Uplands Playfield Improvements 40 - - 40 Seven Oaks Park Improvements 35 - 35 West Fenwick Renovations - 307 - 307 Kiwanis Tot Lot 01 Improvements - 40 - 40 Tudor Square Renovations - 30 - 30 Pine Tree Park Improvements - 300 - 300 West Hill Park Development(Seattle Water) - 777 - 777 5 �+mmbined CIP requests 01.x1s 11121/00 Parks,Recreation and Community Services Capital Improvement Program for Years 2001-2006 Recommend 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total Clark Lake Development 300 30 330 228th Corridor Park1Trailhead(Russell Woods) 25 25 Town Square Park 1.000 - 1,000 Interurban Trail - 30 30 Riverwalk/Riverview Park Development 12 550 562 S.272nd St. Neighborhood Park Development 400 260 660 Commons Playfield Renovations - - 1.040 1,040 Turnkey Park Renovations 63 - 63 Valley Floor Athletic Complex Acq.&D. 770 770 Clark Lake Land Acquisition 3,095 - - 3,095 Grant Matching-Land Acquisition 75 100 100 100 100 100 575 BMX Property Donation 200 - - - - 200 Panther Lake Neighborhood Park Acquisition 350 350 East Hill Youth Sports Complex - 200 200 Kent Memorial Park Acquisition 1.000 - - 1,000 Turnkey Park Acquisition&Parking Lot Development - 250 325 575 3/4 to Pick-up 25 25 Earth Works/Mill Creek Park 14 14 Major Capital and Lifecycle Renovations 250 250 Outside Services 16 16 Total Projects 6,886 3,431 4,357 3,145 2,947 2,828 23,594 .^1 c "1 6 M.xls 11f21/00 General Government Facilities Capital Improvement Program for Years 2001-2006 Recommend 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total Sources of Funds Councilmanic Bond Proceeds 13,000 6.273 19.273 Voted Public Safety Bonds 30,000 30,000 CIP Revenues Required 337 350 350 400 400 400 2.237 Total Sources of Funds 337 30,360 350 13,400 400 6,673 51.510 Projects Emergency Facility Repairs 100 100 100 100 . 100 100 600 Miscellaneous Furniture 82 25 25 25 25 25 207 Sealcoat Parking Lots 40 50 50 50 50 50 290 HVAC Repairs and Controls Installation 40 40 Roof Repairs 75 75 Other Facility Repairs&Improvements 175 175 225 225 225 1,025 Campus Expansion and Renovation 3.300 3,300 New East Hill Maintenance Facility 13,000 13,000 Subtotal General Gov't Facilities' 337 350 350 13,400 400 3,700 18,537 Public Safety Facilities Projects - Municipal Court Building 2,973 2,973 Police Headquarter Building 4,000 16,000 20,000 ther Public Safety Facility Improvements 10,000 10,000 Subtotal Public Safety Facilites - 4.000 26,000 - 2.973 32,973 Total Projects 337 4,350 26,350 13,400 400 6,673 51,510 7 Other General Government Projects Capital Improvement Program for Years 2001-2006 Recommend 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total Sources of Funds Capital Improvement Fund 771 425 425 425 425 425 2.896 From Utility 3 Street Funds 400 400 400 400 400 400 2.400 Couneilmanic Bonds 2. 0 8.000 10 000 Total Sources of Funds 1,171 2, 5 825 8,325 825 825 15.296 Other General Government Projects Water Automated Meter Reading/Rate Study 30 30 Agricultural Land Preservation 50 50 Miscellaneous Projects 100 125 125 125 125 125 725 Various Department Equipment 221 221 Printing Press 70 70 Police and Fire Automation 8,000 Automation Projects 700 2.700 700 700 700 700 6.200 Total Other General Government Projects 1.171 2,025, 825 8,825 825 825 15,296 s 1 Public Safety i Capital Improvement Program for Years 2001 -2006 Recommend 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total I Sources of Funds CIP Revenues Required 490 550 550 550 550 550 3.240 Total Sources of Funds 490 550 550 550 550 550 3,240 Fire 3 Life Safety Fire Equipment Replacement Fund 300 400 400 400 400 400 2.300 Thermal Imaging Cameras 35 - - 35 Breathing Apparatus And Pass Alarm Replacemi 40 40 Hurst Tool Replacement 20 20 Other Fire&Life Safety Projects 75 75 75 75 75 375 Total Fire&Life Safety 395 475 475 475 475 475 2.770 Police CKCF Work Crew Vanfrrailer/Equipment 50 50 CKCF Camera Upgrade/Renovations 12 12 LCO Projector for Classroom 20 20 Misc Police Projects 13 75 75 75 75 75 388 Total Police 95 75 75 75 75 75 470 'otal Public Safety Projects 490 550 550 650 550 550 3,240 r 9 - ---��.• o.=^vests o, :is ttmroo i -Water, Sewer and Stormwater Drainage Capital Improvement Program for Years 2001 -2006 Recommend 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total Sources of Funds Water Fund 702 1,542 2.155 1,534 1,547 1,811 5,291 Drainage Utility Fund 2,416 1.786 1,584 1,462 1,525 970 9,743 Revenue Bonds-Drainage 6,279 6.279 Sewer Utility Fund 57 303 315 327 340 354 1.695 Total Sources of Funds 3,175 3,631 4,054 9,602 3,412 3,135 27,009 Sanitary Sewer Remote Telemetry Upgrades-Phase 1 57 57 Engineering Remodel 73 73 Miscellaneous Sewer Lines 291 303 315 327 340 354 1,930 Total Sanitary Sewer 421 303 315 327 340 354 2,060 Stormwater Drainage Management Mill Creek Flood&Erosion Control Facility 320 320 256th Street Widening 910 910 Outfall Treatment 300 Soo 900 Soos Creek Basin Improvements 592 528 4,379 1,900 7.399 Miscellaneous Drainage Improvements 500 658 684 712 740 770 4.064 Military&Reith Intersection 100 100 94th Ave S&Canyon Or Traffic Signal 250 250 WVH&277th Intersection 100 100 Military Rd&272nd Intersection 200. 200 ' Pacific Highway South HOV-Phase I 500 500 Pacific Highway South HOV-Phase II 785 785 72nd Avenue(196th-200th) 250 250 218th Street Bridge 300 a 300 1.5&277th Intersection Improvement 300 300 120th Ave&248th Street Improvement 250 250 Salmon Recovery 60 60 Engineering Remodel 73 73 Integrated Pest Management Plan 150 150 Remote Telemetry Upgrades-Phase 1 57 57 Total Stormwater Drainage 3,862 1,786 1,084 5,941 3,425 970 16,968 Water Projects East Hill Reservoir 1,050 1,300 2,350 Impoundment Project(124th-118th288th-304th) 300 1,200 1.200 1.450 4,150 Miscellaneous Water Improvements 297 309 521 334 347 361 2,169 Wellhead Protection Plan 250 250 Remote Telemetry Upgrades-Phase 1 172 172 Study-Feed System Evalua6on,GWl,Groundwat 100 100 Water Conservation 100 100 Pump Station 93(Replacement) 75 75 3-Year Lrg Mtr&Vault Replacement Program 33 33 34 100 Remote Site Security Vulnerability Study 50 50 Update of Kent's Water Comprehensive Plan 75 75 Engineering Remodel 73 73 Total Water 1,075 1,642 2,155 1,534 1,547 11811 9,664 .� Total Utility Projects 5,358 3,631 3,554 7,702 6,312 3,135 28,692 10 Cary of Rent Proposed Future Dept Issues 20014010 2000 2001 2002 2003 200A 20G5 2006 :3C' Ices iota. .enema Government Dept :ark lase Land Benda 3.0 3.000 000 3000000 5«nPlan2 (SlOrtul0 ) 10.O00.000 2.00O.0OC 8000000 East Hill Martel Facility•2S% 13 000.000 3.2%.000 Campus Fspsnaror✓Rendvappn 3300000 3 300.00C Municipal Court•proposed 2.973.000 2 973 ON .ubtpbl Debt 5.000.000 11.250,000 6.2T3,00C 22.523 etel aubuc Safety 30.000.000 30.000.000 30.000.0c: .ebt Paid By Other Funds Service East Hill Meant Facility•76% 13,000.000 9.750.000 Soot Creek Basin Oremage Bonds 6.279,000 6270000 �ttbbl Debt 16.021.000 76,023 G: Debt Pnnerpal 5,000.000 27.279.000 6.273.000 38.55:c:: • 11 CITY OF KENT FUTURE BOND ISSUES October 31,2000 Bondlssue Purpose 2000(3) 2001 2002 2003 2004 COUNCILMANIC XTGO) Gen Gov't Parking Garage 4.000,000 Gen Gov't Performing Arts Center Land' 2,500,000 Gen Gov't Fac Bldg Remodel d Generators 2.580.000 Public Safety Police Headquarters Land 1.000.000 Public Safety Two Engine/Aid Fire Apparatus 1.140.000 Gen Gov't Clark Lake Land Bonds 3.0 3,000.000 Gen Gov't East Hill Maint Facility-75%Paid By Other Funds 13,000.000 Gen Gov't Tech Plan 2 (S10m/10yr) 2.000.000 8.000.000 Sub-Total 11,220.000 0 5.000.000 0 21.000.000 VOTED Public Safety Public Safety Projects 30.000.000 Sub-Total 0 0 30,000.000 C 0 REVENUE Drainage Sobs Creek Basin Drainage Bonds 6.279.000 Sub-Total 0 0 0 0 6,279.000 CONTRACT Valley Comm City Portion of Valley Comm Iss 2,551.600 Sub-Total 2.551,600 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 13,771,600 0 35,000,000 0 27.279,000 CITY OF KENT BOND CAPACITY October 31,2000 1.5%of Less Future Bonded Debt Percent of Net Direct Percent of Assessed Assessed Councilmanic Councilmanic Remaining Capacity Remaining Capacity Valuation(1) Valuation Debt Debt Capacity Used Capacity(2) Used 12/31/98 5,867,681.774 88,015,227 (43.173,969) 44,541,258 49.1% 57.806,258 34.3% 04/01/99 5,867,681.775 88.015.227 (42.792.172) 0 45.223.054 48.6% 58.188.054 33.9% 12/01/99 5,867,681.776 88.015.227 (61,960,630) 0 26,054.597 70.4% 39.019.597 55.7% 12/31/99 6,468,731.941 97.030,979 (60,337.630) 0 36.693,349 62.2% 49,073.349 49A% 06/30/00 6,468,731,941 97,030,979 (60,'D19,175) 0 37,011.&9 61.9% 49,391.NX 49.1% 12/31/00 7,134,929.227 107,023.938 (70,247,002) 0 36.776.936 65.6% 48,556.936 54.6% •12131101 7,384,651.750 110,759.776 (65.849,114) 0 44,920,663 59.4% 56,050,663 49.4% 12/31/02 7,643.114,561 114,646,718 (61,427.213) (5,000,000) 48.219.505 57.9% 58.669,505 48.8% 12/31/03 7,910,623.571 118.559.354 (56,775,828) (4,753,936) 57.129,589 51.9% 66.859,589 43.7% 12/31/04 8,187,495.396 122,812,431 (52.014.463) (25,494,793) 45,303,175 63.1% 60.528.175 50.7% (1)The forecast beyond 2000 assumes assessed valuation increases at 2.0 percent par year due to 0 0rmad"am plus 1.5%for new construction. � (2)Total is reduced by Enterprise Fund Debt go is supported by Goo and Drainage Funds. (3)Bond issue for 2000 was competed in 0ctoWr2000. Not included with Future Camaknanie Debt Included in Courtdmenic Debt totals. 'Amounts do not tndude debt taM110111 Of bond Yletl W=Costs. - 12 Long Term Debt Payments General Obligation Debt Service 7,000,000 6,000.000 ' 51000,000 4,000.000 3,000,000 - 2,000,000 - 11000,000 0 Existing■future 1 Existing Issues Original Outstanding Issued Maturity Amount 12131100 • GO Refunding 1985,86,87 1992 2007 10,575,000 5.440,000 • GO Refunding 1978.89 1993 2004 2,765.000 1.130,000 • GO Parks/Street 1996 2016 5,595,000 4,885.000 GO Centennial 1996 2026 12,310,000 11.810.000 GO 1999 Bonds 1999 2019 21,205,000 12,035,000 GO 2000 Bonds 2000 2020 19.070.000 20,015.000 Future Issues Planned Estimated Issue Date Issue Amount Clark Lake Land Bonds 2002 3,000,000 Tech Plan 2(S1 Otn11 Oyr) 2002 2,000.000 Tech Plan 2(S10m110yr) 2004 8,000,000 East Hill Maint Facility 2004 13,000,000 Debt service payments include principal and interest and are net of contributions from the Street and Enterprise Funds. • Refunding projects w•erc for Public Safety,Street and Parks projects. /", 13 "1 '1 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLANS 2000-2001 - 2005-2005 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 Serving Unincorporated King County Kent, Covington, Auburn, Black Diamond, Renton, SeaTac, Washington �^ APRIL 2000 i EXHIBIT. , "'1 "'1 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 12033 SE 256`"Street Kent, Washington 98031-6643 (253) 373-7000 SIX-YEAR CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2000-2001 - 2005-2006 April 2000 BOARD of DIRECTORS Bill Boyce Sandra Collins Scott Floyd r� Mike Jensen Linda Petersen ADMINISTRATION Barbara Grohe, Ph.D. Superintendent Daniel L. Moberly Assistant Superintendent of Business Services Fred H. High Executive Director of Finance Margaret A. Whitney Assistant Superintendent of Human Resources& Student Support Services Gwen Dupree Assistant Superintendent of Secondary Education Janet Rowe Interim Assistant Superintendent of Elementary Education & Instructional Services Kent School District Six-Year captsl Fecitlun Plan AW 2000 Kent School District No. 415- Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan 2000-2001 - 2005-2006 April 2000 "1 For information on the Plan, please call the Finance & Planning Department at (253) 373-7295. Capital Facilities Plan Contributing Staff Gwenn Escher-Derdowski, Community Planning Administrator Joe Zimmer, Finance Department Clint Marsh, Director of Facilities Kathy Metzener& Karla Wilkerson, Facilities Department Kent Schad District Six-Year Capitol Facan Pion April 2DOD KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 SIX-YEAR CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN TABLE of CONTENTS Section Page Number I Executive Summary 2 I I Six-Year Enrollment Projection 4 III Current District "Standard of Service" 8 r^ I V Inventory and Capacity of Existing Schools 12 V Six-Year Planning and Construction Plan 15 V I Relocatable Classrooms 18 V I I Projected Classroom Capacity 20 V I I I Finance Plan and Impact Fee Schedules 25 I X Appendixes 30 KWK School DMOW Sic-Year Capita FacAn Flan April 2000 Pape 1 I Executive Summary This Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") has been prepared by the Kent School District (the "District") as the District's facilities planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act, King County Code K.C.C. 21A.43 and Cities of Kent, Covington, Auburn and Black Diamond. This annual plan update was prepared using data available in the spring of 2000 for the 1999-2000 school year. This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the Kent School District. This Plan is not intended to be the sole planning document for all of the District's needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic Long Range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board Policies, taking into account a longer or shorter time period, other factors and trends in the use of facilities, and other needs of the District as may be required. Any such plan will be consistent with this Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan. The Kent School District Capital Facilities Plan has been adopted by Metropolitan King County Council and Cities of Kent, Covington and Auburn and included in the Capital Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. An impact fee implementing ordinance for the unincorporated areas was effective September 15, 1993. This Plan update has also been submitted to Cities of Kent, Covington, Auburn, Black Diamond, SeaTac, and Renton. A financing plan is included in Section V I I I which demonstrates the District's ability to implement this Plan. This Capital Facilities Plan establishes the District's "standard of service" in order to ascertain the District's current and future capacity. While the State Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines do not account for the local program needs in the District. The Growth Management Act, King County and City codes and ordinances authorize the District to make adjustments to the standard of service based on specific needs of the District. Beginning in 1998, the District's standard provides for class size reduction for grades K - 3 from 26 to 22 students. The District's standard class size for grades 4 - 9 should not exceed 29 students, and class size for grades 10 - 12 should not exceed 31 students. (See section 111 for more specific information.) KOM School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April. 2000 Papa 2 I Executive Summary (continued) The capacities of the schools in the District are calculated based on this standard of service and the existing inventory, which includes some relocatable classrooms. The District's 1999-2000 program capacity of permanent facilities is 24,761 which reflects program changes and the reduction of class size in grades K - 3. Relocatables provide additional transitional capacity until permanent facilities are completed. Kent School District is the fourth largest district in the state. The actual number of individual students per the October 1, 1999, head count was 26,346. Full Time Equivalent (FTE) enrollment for this same period was 25,059.70 (Kindergarten at .5 and excluding Early Childhood Education [ECE] and Running Start students). The District's standard of service, enrollment history and projections, and use of transitional facilities were among subjects studied by the Citizens' Concurrency Task Force. The Final Report of the Concurrency Task Force was approved by the Board of Directors on March 10, 1993: Findings and recommendations of the Concurrency Task Force are discussed further in Section I I I of this Plan. In subsequent years, the current plan is to maintain surplus capacity consistent with today's surplus. This surplus is achieved primarily through the transitional use of relocatables as recommended by the Citizens' Concurrency Task Force. The Concurrency Task Force reaffirms that, as has been the practice and philosophy of the Kent School District, and also based on the most recent recommendation of the Citizens' Facilities Planning Committee, portables are NOT acceptable as permanent facilities. Portables, or, using the more accurate but interchangeable term, "relocatables" may be used as interim or transitional facilities: 1. To prevent overbuilding or overcrowding of permanent school facilities. Z To cover the gap between the time of demand for increased capacity and completion of permanent school facilities to meet that demand. 3. To meet unique program requirements. Use of relocatable and transitional capacity and specific recommendations by the Concurrency Task Force are further discussed in Section V I of this Plan. Pursuant to the requirements of the Growth Management Act, this Plan will be ,.. updated annually, with changes in the fee schedules adjusted accordingly. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April, 21= Page 3 I I Six - Year Enrollment Projection For capital facilities planning, growth projections are based on student yield from documented residential construction projected over the next six years. (see Table 2) The student generation factor, as defined on the next page, is the basis for the growth projections from new developments. King County live births and the District's relational percentage average were used to determine the number of kindergartners entering the system. (See Table 1) Based on the 1999 percentage, 8.57% of King County live births, together with proportional growth .from new construction, is equivalent to the number of students projected to enter kindergarten in the district for the next six-year period. (See Table 2) Early Childhood Education students (formerly identified as "Preschool Special Education [SE) or handicapped") are calculated and reported separately on a .5 FTE basis. The first grade population is traditionally 7 - 8% larger than the kindergarten population due to growth and transfers to the District from private kindergartens. Near term projections assume some growth from new developments to be offset by current local economic conditions. With a few notable exceptions, the expectation is that enrollment increases will occur District-wide in the long term. District projections are based on historical growth patterns combined with continuing development of projects in the pipeline dependent on market and growth conditions. The District will continue to track new development activity to determine impact to schools and monitor conditions to reflect adjustments in this assumption. The six-year enrollment projection anticipates significant enrollment growth from new development currently in some phase of planning or construction in the district. Information on new residential developments and the completion of these proposed developments in all jurisdictions may be considered in the District's future analysis of growth projections. Within practical limits, the District has kept abreast of proposed developments. The Kent School District serves six permitting jurisdictions: unincorporated King County, the cities of Covington, Kent and Auburn. The Lake Sawyer area has recently been annexed to the City of Black Diamond and the western portion of the district includes a small portion of the City of SeaTac. (coribn+ea) Kent School District Sir-Yur C*M FseiMies Plan April, 2000 Pepe 4 I I Six - Year Enrollment Projection (continued) STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR "Student Factor" is defined by code as "the number derived by a school district to describe how many students of each grade span are expected to be generated by a dwelling unit" based on district records of average actual student generated rates for developments completed within the last five years. Following these guidelines, the student generation factor for Kent School District is as follows: Single Family Elementary .515 Junior High .197 Senior High .180 Total .892 Multi-Family Elementary .279 Junior High .086 Senior High .063 Total .428 The student generation factor is based on a survey of 3,149 single family dwelling units and 2,998 multi-family dwelling units with no adjustment for occupancy. Please refer to Appendix E on Page 33 for details of the Student Generation Factor survey. The actual number of students in those residential developments was determined using the District's Education Logistics (EDULOG) Transportation System. In 3,149 single family dwelling units there were 1,622 elementary students, 621 junior high students, and 566 senior high students for a total of 2,809 students. In 2,998 multi-family dwelling units, there were 836 elementary students, 257 junior high students, and 189 senior high students, for a total of 1,282 students. Kent School District Sir-Year Capital Facilities Plan April. 2WO Pape 5 I.. cri at -v 0 co Ln en Ln -w cl) co 0 t.- o CD O rl- 0 Cl)Go 0 P- N w N CO 0 Ul) 0 co CD COiO M 0 N 0 q CL ok LO -7 ': C4 C4 c,%i C4 csi cm C4 C,4 N co 116 Go C*4 co CP V M 0 h in 9-4 0 0) CO f- to) (3) co W 0 CD 0 -W , Nr, N Ln to co m en 0) eq co 0 0 N 0 , 0 O 0) 0) M co (D R eV C4 'i 4 R R CD v LO Ln 0 co r.- CO M cc cn ID r,-W 01 m -W co 4m Ncn co -V -e Go to CD 0) 0 0 0 4m 4m IM 0) co Ln co C4 C4 C4 C4 C4 V4 NNto W mr N CV co -W N-W W) mN co I* N C) fn Ln om 0) co co CD-W Nkn 0 C) 0 0) 01 W Of to Im go w co r N r N r -7 -7 r r r r r r N C) N Ln 0) en -e co en to co r- v Ln C4 0) P- 9 N cm 01 (D to 0 eO ob cm 0 CD 0 m co CD CO P` co qw 6n cq UJ Ch cq ci eV cm to w 46 .x c V) W 1w C)e, 0) co co U.) m 0) Ln 0) m m (n CD V) co 0 fn W -W 0) -W OD 0 0) CV) 03 f� NCL WO cn m CO) , o #.- W) 0) to 0 0 0) OD co w WI) -E NNCO In ~ cn Lo Z f- go N C) f- (D 0) N CD (D a) P. -W P. V) 0 Ln I Re VD CO -W vi M C 0 0 CD C) 0) 0 r� r� Ln m co I . . . Cl) 0) wz eq cli cc C-4 N Z -J 0 CV) Cb 00 0 %n CY P� 0 Ir Go co LO cv N M 4n 0 0 N 0) en m a. ZCD - w - CY , v 5 ui CD 0 0 4M IM CD 4M Co Co P.- (D CC qW CD N CD r cq fa m t cm T) Z P� Ln "r P� Cc LO co) CD V) CN N GO co r- M I — CD Ln CA W V 0 0 M N N Go 0 W co LO 0 C%i C%j Lr) 0 L "t G ak lot ck act ot ck P-L f-I iq CR -W -W N 0 p IZ CV 1.: .97 N U uj C) N m v Ln -W M U) COP.- Ca)) P� 0 In cv Go W co Ln a) act P. CO P� r� w 0 IV 4w m C4 4m N Z C) C6 I C.) E ui N X 0) 0) CO Ch m N cc fD 0) V) co -W 0) Co r- 0 v c� 0 0 Ln to M 0 Ln to cc N N ui co p- P- P. to in Ln in w w cn cm C) en m . CR 0 co CL v N O CO cn I.R 0 CO M CO co 0 v C4 V.. co m en -W CO 0 a) en N 0 f� V) Ln 0 N Ln 426 cc P-t. (D W) in w -W t.) cn w -W C4 V) co (D fn 0 N cn CO 0 on In v Agn 0 COtD 4m N CO r- %n cn 0) CA co IV co to lw IV m N V) en tn N en C" co Go L6 M CD r- IE cc > ma) 4) 2! .9 U) 0 A — ell z e 0 C14 r_ 9 > cc cc N V) V Ul) co 1� 40 0 ui c e e 4) 4) d 0 0 0 0 0 v 0 43 4) 4) cc CD 10 0W W W 0V cc CD a a a o o o 0 a 0 0 IE KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.415 SIX-YEAR FTE ENROLLMENT PROJECTION v^ AC'TUAL P R .0 ,. -J E C ,T I 0 N 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 King County Live Births' 21,972 21,817 21,573 21.646 22,212 22.780 23,350 Increase/Decrease -358 -155 -244 73 566 568 570 Kindergarten/Birth% 2 8.57% 8.52% 8.500/6 8.50% 8.50% 8.50% 8.50% 3 Earry Crwbrnod Edueamn 0.5 58 59 59 60 61 62 63 3 Kindergarten FTE .5 942 929 949 974 989 1,038 1,044 Grade 1 1,989 2,053 1,963 2,027 2,070 2,126 2,210 Grade 2 2,078 1,975 2,095 2,027 2,082 2,150 2.189 Grade 3 2,111 2,077 2,018 2,162 2,084 2.164 2,215 Grade 4 2222 2,082 2,118 2,082 2,218 2.165 2,228 Grade 5 2,037 2.179 2,086 2,145 2,100 2,260 2.190 Grade 6 2,119 2,056 2230 2.160 2.209 2,189 2,332 Grade 7 2,081 2,170 2,113 2,322 2,337 2,318 2,396 Grade 8 2,015 2,020 2,143 2,117 2,409 2,367 2.434 Grade 9 2,102 2,158 2,159 2,320 2,379 2,623 2,664 Grade 10 2,045 2.254 2,353 2,321 2.492 2,555 2,634 Grade 11 1,782 1,866 2,085 2,176 2,145 2,302 2,295 Grade 12 1,537 1.411 1,625 1,814 1,892 1,864 1,936 Total FTE Enrollment 25,118 25,319 25,996 26,707 27,467 28,173 28,830 rr.:3 Yearly Increase 176 201 677 711 760 706 657 Yearly Increase% 0.72% 0.80% 2.67% 2.74% 2.85% 2.57% 2.33% Cumulative Increase 288 489 1,166 1,877 2,637 3,343 4,000 Full Time Equivalent(FTEJ 25.118 25,319 25,996 26,707 27,467 28,173 28,830 Kindergarten projection based an King County actual live birth percentage and proportional growth from new construction. 2 Kindergarten FTE enrotlmsnt projection at.5 is calculated by using the District's percentage of King County Gve births 5 years earlier compared to actual kindergarten enrollment in the previous year.(ECE a Early Childhood Education) 3 Oct.99 P223 Headcount is 26,103. Oct.99 full student headcount including 116 Preschool 3 236 Runneg Starl s 26.346. G R O W T H P R O J E C T 1 0 N S - Adjustments for current economic factors For facilities planning purposes,this six-year enrollment projection anticipates significant enrolment growth from new development currently in some phase of planning or construction in the district. Kent School District Six-Year Qptal FaaTdias plan Table Z April, 2000 page 7 III Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" In order to determine the capacity of the District's facilities, the King County Code refers to a "standard of service" that each school district must establish in order to ascertain its overall capacity. The standard of service identifies the program year, the class size, the number of classrooms, students and programs of special need, and other factors determined by the District which would, in the District's judgment, best serve its student population. This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. Relocatables included in the capacity calculation use the same standard of service as the permanent facilities. (See Appendix A, B S C) The standard of service defined herein may continue to change in the future. Beginning in 1998, the District's standard class size for grades K - 3 was reduced from 26 to 22. Kent School District is continuing a long-term strategic planning process which may affect aspects of the District's "standard of service". Future changes to the standard of service will be reflected in future capital facilities plans. Current Standards of Service for Elementary Students Class size for grades K - 3 should not exceed 22 students. . Class size for grades 4 - 6 should not exceed 29 students. Program capacity for regular education classrooms is calculated at an average of 25 students per classroom because there are four grade levels at K - 3 and fluctuations between primary and intermediate grade levels (i.e. Third / Fourth grade split classes, etc.). Students may be provided music instruction and physical education in a separate classroom or facility. Students may have scheduled time in a special computer lab. Special Education for students with disabilities may be provided in a self- contained classroom with a capacity of 10-15 depending on the program. (am) Kent School Distnet Sic-Year capital facilities Plan April. 2000 Papa a III Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" (continued) Identified students will also be provided other educational opportunities in classrooms for programs designated as follows: English As a Second Language (ESL) Self-contained Special Education Programs Integrated Programs & Resource Rooms (for special remedial assistance) Education for Disadvantaged Students (Title 1) Gifted Education Other Remediation Programs Learning Assisted Program (LAP) School Adjustment Programs for severely behavior-disordered students Hearing Impaired Mild, Moderate and Severe Developmental Disabilities Developmental Kindergarten Early Childhood Education (3-4 yr. old preschool handicapped students) Some of the above special programs require specialized classroom space, as r well as music and physical education classrooms, computer labs, etc.; thus, the permanent capacity of some of the buildings housing these programs is reduced, Some students, for example, leave their regular classroom for a short period of time to receive instruction in these special programs and space must be allocated to serve these programs. Some newer buildings have been constructed to accommodate most of these programs; some older buildings have been modified, and in some circumstances, these modifications reduce the classroom capacity of the buildings. When programs change, program capacity fluctuates and is updated annually to reflect the change in program and capacity. Current Standards of Service for Secondary Students The standards of service outlined below reflect only those programs and educational opportunities provided to secondary students which directly affect the capacity of the school buildings. Class size for grades 7 - 9 should not exceed 29 students. Class size for grades 10 - 12 should not exceed 31 students. Special Education for students with disabilities may be provided in a self- contained classroom with a capacity of 10-15 depending on the program. (ewirivad) R Kent school District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April, 2DW Pays 9 III Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" (continued) Identified students will also be provided - other education opportunities in classrooms for programs designated as follows: Computer Labs English As a Second Language (ESL) Integrated Programs & Resource Rooms (for special remedial assistance) Preschool and Daycare Honors (Gifted) and Advanced Placement Programs Basic Skills Programs Traffic Safety Education JROTC- Junior Reserve Officers Training Corps Variety of Technical & Applied Programs (Vocational Education) i.e. Home & Family Life (Cooking, Sewing, Child Development, etc.) Business Education (Keyboarding, Accounting, Business Law, Sales & Marketing, etc.) Woods, Metals, Welding, Electronics, Manufacturing Technology, Auto Shop, Commercial Foods, Commercial Art, Drafting & Drawing, Electronics, Careers, etc. Many of these programs and others require specialized classroom space which can reduce the permanent capacity of the school buildings. In addition, an alternative home school assistance, choice and transition program is provided for students in grades 2-12 at Kent Learning Center. Space or Classroom Utilization As a result of scheduling conflicts for student programs, the need for specialized rooms for certain programs, and the need for teachers to have a work space during their planning periods, it is not possible to achieve 100% utilization of regular teaching stations. Based on the analysis of actual utilization of classrooms, the District has concluded that the standard utilization rate is 95% for elementary schools and 85% for secondary schools. In future, the District will continue close analysis of actual utilization. Kent School District Citizens' Concurrency Task Force The Kent School District Board of Directors appointed a Citizens' Concurrency Task Force, made up of a cross section of the community, to assist in defining the District's Standard of Service. To accomplish this task, the Task Force was directed to study Kent School District enrollment history and projections, demographics and planned new developments, land availability for new schools, facility capacities and plans, frequency of boundary changes, and portable (relocatable) vs. permanent facility issues. A meeting for public input was conducted and the Final Report of the Citizens' Concurrency Task Force was approved by the Board of Directors on March 10, 1993. (corrirwad) Kent schod District sa-Yar Capital FaciMies Pun April. 2000 Pops 10 III Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" (continued) The Final Report of the Citizens' Concurrency Task Force included Findings and Recommendations and provision for the following long term goals: A. Seek to reduce classroom utilization rates to allow more flexibility on the building level. B. Seek to lower average class size from that established for the 1992-93 school year. C. Seek to minimize boundary changes. D. Ensure that new permanent facilities are designed to accommodate portables: 1) to resolve current quality concerns 2) to provide for sites for portables to meet increased demand. E. Pursue modernization of current permanent facilities to resolve current quality concerns and to provide for additional sites for portables to meet increased demand. F. Pursue modernization or replacement of current portables to resolve quality concerns. G. Ensure that new portables meet current concerns of quality. H. Ensure that all sites for portables be modernized and utilities be installed to meet quality concerns. I. The quality of facilities, when using relocatable facilities, is a major concern of citizens of the Kent School District. Use of relocatable and transitional capacity as well as more specific concerns and recommendations by the Task Force are further discussed in Section V I of this Plan. The Task Force also states that it has reviewed and accepted the explanation of methodology and the conclusions reached in the enrollment Forecasting System i' report and recommends that methodology not be changed without Board approval. Kent School District Sic-Year Capital Facilities Plan April, 2000 pope 11 I V Inventory and Capacity of Existing Schools Currently, the District has permanent program capacity to house 24,761 students based on the District's Standard of Service as set forth in Section I I I. Included in this Plan is an inventory of the District's schools by type, address and current Capacity. (See Table 3 on Peg& 13) The program capacity is periodically updated for changes in programs. It also reflects the reduction in class size from 26 to 22 in grades K - 3 which was implemented in 1998. The class size reduction received voter approval in the Educational Programs and Operations Levy to continue through 2002. Since 1997, Kent Learning Center has -served grades 2 through 12 with transition, choice and home school assistance programs. it is located in the former Grandview School in the western part of the District. This school was designed and is currently configured as an elementary school. 1 Calculation of Elementary, Junior High and Senior High School capacities are set forth in Appendices A, B and C on pages 30 and 31. A map of existing schools is included on Page 14. IWN Schad DWat Sk-Yew CapMN Fnoibt Pkn ApY, 2DW. Paps 12 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.415 INVENTORY and CAPACITY of EXISTING SCHOOLS 1999 2D00 Year SCHOOL Opened ASR ADDRESS Program .. Capacrtv Carnage Crest Elementary 19M CC 18235.14oth Avenue SE. Renton 98088 485 Cedar Valley Elementary 1971 CV 26500 Tamberlane Way SE. Covington SW42 461 Covington Elementary 1951 CO 17070 SE Was Road, Covington 98042 542 Crestwood Elementary 1980 CW 25225-la*h Avenue SE. Covington 98042 428 Daniel Elementary 1992 DE 11310 SE 24&h Street. Kent 9=1 456 East Hill Elementary 1953 EH 9025 S 240th Street, Kem 98031 413 Emerald Park 1999 EP 11OW SE 218th Street, Kem 9a031 475 Fairwood Elementary 1969 FW 18800.148th Avenue SE. Remora 9805a 428 Glenridgo Elementary 1996 GR 19"-120th Avenue SE,Ramon 98M 461 Grass Lake Elementary 1971 GL 28700.191st Place SE. Kem 95042 447 Horizon Elementary 1990 HE 27641-144th Avenue SE, Kent 98042 416 Jenkins Creek Elementary 1987 JC 26915.186th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 423 Kent Elementary 1999 KE 24700.641h Avenue South, KOM 95032 466 Lake Youngs Elementary 1965 LY 196W-142nd Avenue SE. Kent 98042 594 Martin Sartain Elementary 1987 MS 12711 SE 248th Street, Kent 98031 475 Meadow Ridge Elementary 1994 MR 27710.108th Avenue SE.Kent 98031 447 Meridian Elemertary, 1939 ME 25621-140th Avenue SE, Kent 98042 556 Neely-O'Brien Elementary 1990 NO 6300 South 236th Street, Kent 98(132 437 Panther Lake Elementary 1938 Pl. 20931-108th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 350 Park Orchard Elementary 1963 PO 11010 SE 232nd Street, Kem 98031 494 Pine Tree Elementary 1967 PT 27US-118th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 523 Ridgewood Elementary 1987 RW 1803D-162nd Place SE, Renton 98M 523 Sawyer Woods Elementary 1994 SW 31135 228th Avenue SE.Kent 98042 499 Scenic Hill Elementary 1980 SH 26025 Woodland Way South. Kent 98031 437 Soos Creek Elementary 1971 SC 12651 SE 218th Place, Kent 98031 456 Spnngbrook Elementary 1959 SE 20035-100th Awnue BE. Kent 98031 423 Sunnse Elementary 1992 SR 2230D-132nd Avenue SE. Kam 99042 532 Elementary TOTAL 12.679 Cedar Heights Junior High 1993 CH 19640 SE 272 Street.Covington 98042 971 Kent Junior High 1952 KJ 620 North Central Avenue, Kent 98032 810 Mattson Junior High 1981 MA 1640D SE 251st Street, Covington 98042 815 Meeker Junior High 1970 MK 128W SE 192nd Street, Renton 98058 897 Meridian Junior High 1958 MJ 2340D-120th Avenue SE, Kam 98031 753 Northwood Junior Hqh 19M NW 170D7 SE 184th Street, Ramon 98058 959 Sequoia Junior High 1966 SJ 1100D SE 264th Street, Kent SW31 $12 Junior High TOTAL 6.017 Kent-Meridian Senior High 1951 KM 10020 BE 25&h Street, KOM 95071 1,391 Kentleke Senior High School 1997 KL 21401 BE 300M Street.KOM 95042 1,635 Kentndge Senor High 1968 KR 12430 BE 2081h Street. Kehl 90031 1.311 Kentwood Senor High 1981 KW 25OW-164m Avenue SE, Covington 95042 1.312 Senor High TOTAL 5,649 Kent Learning Center(Grandview)t 1965 LC 22420 Military Road, Des Moores 95198 416 DISTRICT TOTAL 24,761 Charges to capacity nI , program changes and continued raduction in K-3 class size from 26 to 22. Kent Leemirg Center serves grades 2.12. The building was formerly known as Grsndvie w Elementary. Kent School District Sis-Year Caput Facilities Plan Table 3 Aprll.2000 chop. 13 LO 2 0 c k _ E_ 2 E e c c c o i 2 > D $ ! _ 3 D 2 2 (-Is 6- 0 ƒ2 � 00 U % �! %f ! �!�e !■ . , ! !! !! a � ® s._: , $ Jill ' ° ■ ■ o 2 k k \ _ . . 2 -x I f� �e � � e . �E ■ � k k \ I ■ 4 c a a C - bc ■ __, a ®� § � ■ 2 ° . � KOV Sd"DaUld So-Yaw COPIN,sdkm Pion ' pop 14 V The District's Six-Year Planning and Construction Plan At the time of preparation of this Plan in spring of 2000, the following projects are recently completed or under construction in the District: • Kent Elementary#27a is located at 24700 -64'" Avenue S. near downtown Kent. The school opened in January 1999 and students, staff and programs moved from the old Kent Elementary to the new Kent Elementary at that time. The new school retained the original name "Kent Elementary" and boundary changes and new programs were implemented in the Fall of 1999. • Emerald Park Elementary#29 is at 11800 SE 216th Street. The school opened in the fall of 1999. • Millennium Elementary#30 is under construction and scheduled to open in the fall of 2000. It is in the city of Kent at 11919 SE 270'" Street. • Construction funding for Elementary#31 and 32 will be presented for voter approval at a later date. The sites have not been determined. • Junior.High#8 is planned to fill future needs for grades 7 through 9. The Board authorized purchase of a site for this school at SE 286"* Street on the east side of 124" Avenue SE. Timing of*the opining of the school is under review and dependent on enrollment needs and voter approval. Other future facilities are listed in Table 4 and shown on the site map on page 17. Each of the elementary schools has capacity planned for approximately 540 students each, depending on placement of special programs. Junior high schools are planned for a program capacity of approximately 1,065 students and Kentlake Senior High (#4) has a current program capacity of 1,635. County and city planners, decision-makers and school districts are encouraged to consider safe walking conditions for all students when reviewing applications and design plans for new developments. This should include sidewalks for pedestrian safety, pull-outs and turn arounds for school buses. Included in this Plan is an inventory of projects by type, size, location or region, and estimated completion date. Also included in the inventory are sites identified by the District, which are potentially acceptable site alternatives in the future. (see Table q The voter approved 1990 Bond Issue for $105.4 million included funding for the purchase of eleven sites for some of these and future schools, and the sites acquired to date are included in this Plan. Funding is secured for purchase of additional sites. Not all undeveloped properties meet school construction requirements and some property may be traded or sold to meet future facility needs. Based on voter approval of $130 million in construction funding in February 1994, Millennium Elementary #30 is the last one to be constructed which has received voter approval. A $97.5 million bond proposal for the construction of Junior High #8, Elementary #31 and significant improvements to existing schools is pending voter approval at the time of preparation of this Plan in the spring of 2000. Kent School District Six-Year Capeal Facilities Plan April, 2000 Pays 1s KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.415 Projects Planned, Under Construction. or Providing Additional Capacity Site Acquisitions included Projected Projected7G=rowtn SCHOOL / FACILITY / SITE LOCATION Type Status corffpktion Program Date CaoscM �owor,mne Aeoroarnrm ELEMENTARY (Numbers assgr»d to yuarre schools may not correlate with number of errsong schools.) Millennium Elementary(9 30) (Funded) 11919 SE 270th St,Kent 91 l New eo saeeeae 2000 465 50% Ekfinentary W 31 (Unkr4sM' To be determined ' New Planning 2004 540 75% Elementary*32 (Unfunded)2 To be determined ' New Planning 2005 540 75% JUNIOR HIGH Junior High i 8 (Unfunded)2 SE 28tmh St&124 Av SE,VAN New Planning 2003 1,065 75% SENIOR HIGH Kentlake Senior High opened in 1997 and continues to provide capacity. Additional TEMPORARY FACILITIES Capacity Relocatables For placement as needed New Planning 2000+ 25•3e..ea t O0% SUPPORT FACILITIES Satellite Bus Facility (Unfunded)2 To be determined ' Naw Planning 7 N/A and Use OTHER SITES ACQUIRED Type JuLtisdieUon Covington area (Near Mabson JH) SE 251 d 164 SE, Covington 98042 Elementary Coy of Covington Covington area (Sarseia) BE 290&156 SE, Kent 98042 Ekmwfgry King County Ham Lake area (Pollard) ISl=BE 240, Kent 98042 Elementary Kig Coatty Horseshoe/Keevies Lake was(Wan) BE 332 E 204 SE, Kent 98042 Junior High King County Shady Lake area (Sowers,etc.) 17420 SE 192 Street, Renton 9W58 Ekmtmlary KkV County So.King Co.Activity Center(Nike site) SE 167 d 170 SE, Ranter 9WW School or King county Support Facility Notes: ' Some sues are acquied but plaamwnt has not been determined. 7 Unfunded facility reads we pending voter approval. Kent School District Six-Year Capita Faedifias Plan Table 4 Agri,2000 Psga 16 to j• '•1 .,, �� w�,� `r+ :rt:., �� t= 't 1K.W..^ • ••.. ri ♦�7: 1. .« ate: c� t3 • Xo•• im CA, so Sir at _ ri:�' :r.. "�:�f�:�y {••: '�`s= e E i c:+.ems. •� ,Jt ellWAT IRSHU Ep th IE ow - � J ;,:w:;•!''^•�•:ro.fit ,�g. � f 11 t•...�I.t.. •c �f i .� * W La{f � � f♦ V ^+. �� .mow-•rr.►... fw all KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 'No. 415 /� Sites Acquired or Under Construction < �' .%" \ 1 ...► ` S R Senior High site .j f ..•:•--� J ■ Junior High site / '" •• �. E e Elementary site f t�.ate f X r- Support Facility she %*dew AAsp scum: Krq County PMndnp t ConYnvdy DrMopttlent DiMWm SAe kWilkshm by KaA Sohaol Datriet •'~ Kent Schad District Six-yew Cap"Facwjn Plan Pope 17 V I Relocatable Classrooms Currently, the District utilizes 155 total relocatables. Of this total, 85 are utilized to house students in excess of permanent capacity, 65 are used for program purposes at school locations, and five for other purposes.(See Appendices A B C D) Based on enrollment projections and funded permanent facilities, the District anticipates the need to purchase some relocatables during the next six-year period. In the Final Report approved by the Board of Directors on March 10, 1993, the Kent School District Citizens' Concurrency Task Force reaffirmed that, as has been the practice and philosophy of the Kent School District, portables (or "relocatables") are NOT acceptable as permanent facilities. In addition to the Findings and Recommendations regarding portables listed in Section 1 1 1, "Standard of Service," the Task Force also listed some specific concerns in regard to use of portables as interim or transitional capacity: 1. The quality of facilities, when using relocatable facilities, is a major concern of citizens of the Kent School District. That the Kent School District should consider the following factors and priorities when using, purchasing and modernizing portables: A. HIGHEST CONCERNS 1. Adequate heat 2. Portable covered walkways, where practical 3. Adequate ventilation 4. Fire Safety B. MODERATE CONCERNS 1. Adequate air conditioning 2. Security 3. Intercoms / Communication 4. Restroom facilities 5. Storage facilities 6. Crowding / class size 7. Noise 8. Availability of equipment (i.e. projectors, etc.) 9. Lack-of water (use bottled water/portable tanks for drain) (continaw) Kent School District sir-ynr capital Facitifin Plan Apt, 2000 pop Ig V I Relocatable Classrooms (cornrnuea) For the purpose of clarification, the term "portables" and the more descriptively accurate term, "relocatables" are used interchangeably in this Plan as well as in the Concurrency Task Force Report. The reports also reference use of portables or relocatables as interim or transitional capacity/facilities. During the time period covered by this Plan, the District does not anticipate that all of the District's relocatables will be replaced by permanent facilities. During the useful life of some of the relocatables, the school-age population may decline in some communities and increase in others, and these relocatables provide the flexibility to accommodate the immediate needs of the community. Although the Citizens' Concurrency Task Force has reaffirmed that portables are not acceptable as PERMANENT facilities, they did recommend that portables, or relocatables, may be used as interim or transitional facilities: 1. To prevent overbuilding or overcrowding of permanent school facilities. 2. To cover the gap between the time of demand for increased capacity and completion of permanent school facilities to meet that demand. 3. To meet unique program requirements. Portables, or relocatables, currently in use will be evaluated resulting in some being improved and some replaced. Quality concerns will be among those addressed by the next Citizens' Facilities Planning Committee in review of capital facilities needs for the next bond issue. The Plan projects that the District will use relocatables to accommodate interim housing needs for the next six years and beyond. The use of relocatables, their impacts on permanent facilities, life cycle and operational costs, and the interrelationship between relocatables, emerging technologies and educational restructuring will continue to be be examined. Kent School District Sir-Ynr capital Facilities Plan April, 2tx10 Pape 19 V I I Projected Six-Year Classroom Capacities As stated in Section I V, the program capacity study is periodically updated for changes in special programs and reflects class size reduction in Grades K - 3. As shown in the Inventory and Capacity chart in Table 3 on Page 13, the program capacity is also reflected in the capacity and enrollment comparison charts. (SN Tabas 5 6 5 A43-C on pages 21.24) The first school day of October is set by OSPI as the enrollment count date for the year. Full Time Equivalent (FTE) student enrollment for October 1, 1999 was 25,059.70 with kindergarten students counted at .5 and excluding Early Childhood Education students (ECE - preschool special education) and College-only Running Start FTE's. (Sae Tablas 5 d 5 A-B-C on pages 21.24) A headcount of all students enrolled on October 1, 1999 totals 26,346 which continues to rank Kent School District as the fourth largest district in the state of Washington. "1 Based on the enrollment forecasts, current inventory and capacity, current standard of service, relocatable capacity, and future planned classroom space, the District anticipates having sufficient capacity to house students over the next six years. (see Table 5 and Taaas 5 A-B-C on Pages 21-24) This does not mean that some schools will not experience overcrowding. There will be significant need for new schools to accommodate growth within the District. Some schools, by design, may be opened with relocatables on site. Boundary changes, limited movement of relocatables, zoning changes, market conditions, and educational restructuring will all play a major role in addressing overcrowding and underutilization of facilities in different parts of the District. Kem Se DaMd Sa-Yar COPM FacMes Plan Apd. 2OW Papa 20 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 416 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY TOTAL DISTRICT SCHOOL YEAR 1999-20110 2000-2m01 1 2001-2002 2002-=3 1 2003.2004 200420 20052006 Actual P R O J E C T E D Permanent Program Capacity 23,820 24,761 25,246 25.246 25,246 26.,311 26,851 New Permanent Construction ' Kent Elementary#27a 466 Kent Elementary replacement Emerald Park Elementary#29 475 Millennium Elementary#30 485 Junior High# 8 (Unfunded)' 1,065 �. Elementary# 31 (Unfunded)4 540 Elementary# 32 (Unfunded)' 540 Permanent Pr ram Capacity Subtotell 24,761 25,246 25,246 25,246 26,311 26,851 27,391 Interim Relocatable Capacity Elementary Relxatable Capacity Required 475 0 0 75 250 50 0 Junior High Reloeatable Capacity Required 203 377 406 754 58 232 435 Senior High Relxotable Capacity Required 0 0 434 682 899 1,085 1.240 [Total Relocatable Capacity Required3 678 377 840 1,511 1,207 1,367 1,675 TOTAL CAPACITY ' 25,439 25,623 26.086 1 26.757 1 27.518 1 28,218 1 29,066- 2 TOTAL FTE ENROLLMENT/PROJECTION 25,118 25,319 25,996 26,707 27,467 28.173 28,830 DISTRICT AVAILABLE CAPACITY 321 304 90 50 51 45 236 ' Capacity is based on standard of service for program capacity and updated periodically to reflect program changes. /-. 2 FTE=Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment (ie.ECE Preschool Handicapped 312 day Kindergarten student=.5). 3 1999-2000 total classroom relocatable capacity is 1,621. Unfunded facility needs are pending voter approval. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 April,200o Page 21 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL YEAR 1999-20W 2000-20ot I 2WI-21 a¢ 2002-2003 I 2003-2W4 2004-20o5 I 2005-20os AcbAl P R O J E C T E D Elementary ftrManent Prograrn Capecity 11,738 13,095 13.580 13,580 13,580 13,580 14,120 KarK Learning Center-Special Program ' 416 Naw Permanent Elismentary Cartruetian� Kent Elementary#27a 466 Repla, nt for old Kwd EW ronim Emerald Park Elementary#29 475 Millennium Elementary#30 485 Elementary#31 (Unfunded)' 540 Elementary#32 (Unfunded)' 540 Suetow 13,095 13,580 13,580 13,580 13,580 14,120 14,660 Relocatable Capacity Required 475 0 0 75 250 50 0 TOTAL CAPACITY 2 13,570 13,580 13.580 13,655 13,830 14.170 14,660 FTE ENROLLMENT/PROJECTION 3 13,556 13,410 13,518 13,637 13,813 14,154 14,471 SURPLUS(DEFICIT)CAPACITY 14 170 62 18 17 16 189 ' Kent Learning Center is a special program at Grandview School serving students in Grades 2 through 12. The school was designed and is currently configured as an elementary school. 2 Capacity is based on standard of service for program capacity and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. 9 FTE =Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment or Projection (ECE & Kindergarten= .5) Unfunded facility needs are pending voter approval. Kent School District Sol-Yesr CapiW Facilities PW Table 5 A April 200p Pepe 22 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL YEAR t999.2000 2000-2001 toot-=2 20tY2-2= 1 Zo03-2004 2004-2005 1 20OS-2006 Actual P R O J E C T E D Junior High Permanent Program Capacity 6,017 6,017 6,017 6,017 6,017 7,082 7,082 New Permanent Junior High Catstruetiort Junior High#8 (Unfunded)3 1,065 sutttotal 6,017 6,017 6,017 6,017 7,082 7,082 7,082 Relocatable Capacity Required 203 377 406 754 58 232 435 TOTAL CAPACITY ' 6.220 6,394 6,423 6,771 7,140 7.314 7,517 FTE ENROLLMENT i PROJECTION 2 6,198 6,378 6,415 6,759 7,125 7.298 7,494 SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 22 16 8 12 15 16 23 tt ' Capacity is based on standard of service for program capacity and updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 FTE =Approximate Full Time p Equivalent Enrollment/Projection Approximately 10 Junior High students are served part of the day at high schools for advanced placement. 3 I Unfunded facility needs are pending voter approval. r— Kent School District Sic-Year Captal Facilities Plan Table 5 B April 2= Page 23 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL YEAR tN9.= 2000.200/ 1 200t-= 2002-2t>ai =3-2004 =,I-M05 1 200520W Actual P R O J E C T E D Senior High Permanent Pmgraun Capacity 1 5,649 5,649 5.649 5,649 5,649 5,649 5.649 New Permanent Senior High Consbuction SubtoW 5,649 5,649 5.649 5,649 5,649 5,649 5,649 Relocatable Capacity Required 434 682 899 1.085 1,240 TOTAL CAPACITY ' 5,649 5.649 6,083 6,331 6,548 6,734 6,889 FTE ENROLLMENT/PROJECTION 5,364 5,531 6.063 6,311 6,529 6,721 6,865 SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 285 118 20 20 19 13 24 Capacity is based on standard of service for program capacity and updated periodically to reflect program changes. Z FTE =Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment, excluding full time Running Start students. Approximately 10 Junior High students are served part of the day at high schools for advanced placement. Kant Sctwol Dowd Six-Year Capital FaciWes Plan Table 5 C ApY 2000 Page 24 V I I I Finance Plan The finance plan shown on Table 6 demonstrates how the Kent School District plans to finance improvements for the years 2000 - 2001 through 2005 - 2006. The financing components include secured and unsecured funding. The plan is based on voter approval of future bond issues, collection of impact fees under the State Growth Management Act and voluntary mitigation fees paid pursuant to State Environmental Policy Act. Kent Elementary # 27a, replacement for the original Kent Elementary School, is the last school for which the District expects to receive state matching funds under the current state funding formula. For the Six-Year Finance Plan, costs of future schools are based on estimates from Kent School District Facilities Department. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April, 200D Papa 25 E e�i ri vi rc � ri N C4 LL N M M N M M M � N� C. 44 N N M N to N a Ch Nso fV Im N K:y O O .. I�f N Pl N ONi `S- to » » N » » N F }y. in Y ' g cm uj 8 8 H Z to G z M » J LL Q Q Cd 2 W t+> ZS 25 F� N '' 8 LU z to N X g w v o N CY 4 Y w LL 60 p1 N N W = = WIr O V 4ft m LL F O cv a`Si •� tL � LL � n' E$ = w w w • � w w W W KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT FACTORS FOR ESTIMATED IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS Student Generation Factors -Single Family Student Generation Factors - Multi-Family Elementary 0.515 Elementary 0.279 Junior High 0.197 Junior High 0.086 Senior High 0.180 Senior High 0.063 Total 0.892 Total 0.428 Projected Student Capacity per Facility SPl Square Footage per Student Elementary 540 Elementary 80 Junior High 1,065 Junior High 113.33 Senior High 1,650 Senior High 120 Required Site Acreage per Facility Average Site Cost/Acre Elementary (required) 11 Elementary s0 Junior High (required) 21 Junior High s0 Senior High (required) 27 Senior High so New Facility Construction Cost/Average` Temporary Facility Capacity & Cost Elementary $9,011,914 Elementary 25 $78,504 Junior High 521,696,026 Junior High 29 $78,504 Senior High -so Senior High @ 31 578.504 See average calculations on Pg.27a Temporary Facility Square Footage State Match Credit Elementary 86,212 Current State Match Percentage 0.00% Junior High 25,256 Previous State Match 55.64% Senior High 21,736 Total • 4% 133.204 Boeckh Index Factor Current Boeckh Index $101.27 Permanent Facility Square Footage Elementary 1,410,811 Junior High 743.063 District Average Assessed Value Senior High 849,464 Single Family Residence $176,547 Total 96% 3,003,338 Total Facilities Square Footage District Average Assessed Value Elementary 1,497,023 Multi-Family Residence $56,029 Junior High 768,319 Senior High 871,200 Total 3,136,542 District Debt Service Tax Rate Current /$1000 Rate $2.32 Developer Provided Sites/Facilities Value 0 General Obligation Bond Interest Rate Dwelling Units 0 Current Bond Buyer Index 5.94% Kent School District Six-Year Capital FwA ies Plan April 2DOtl Pape 27 For impact fee calculations, construction costs are based on the average costs of the last five elementary schools and the next elementary school, and the average costs of the last two junior high schools and the next junior high school. Elementary Schools Cost Average Sawyer Woods $6,463,054 Meadow Ride $6 996,325 Glenrid a $8,032,895 Kent Elementary #27a $10,122,095 Emerald Park #29 $10,957 114 Millennium Elementary #30 $11,500,000 Average Cost of 6 elementary schools $9 011,914 Junior High Schools Cost Average Cedar Heights $14,488,028 Northwood $17 100,049 Junior High #8 $33 500,000 Average Cost of 3 junior hi oh schools 1 $21,696,026 The impact fee calculations on pages 28 and 29 include a "District Adjustment" which is equal to the amount of increase that the impact fee formulas drive out for this year. The reasons for this adjustment include: 1) the district's long-term commitment to keep impact fee increases as minimal as possible, 2) the courts have not made a final determination on the validity of the voter approval of tax increases section of Initiative 695, 3) proposed Initiative 722 would require fee roll-backs and 4) the district's desire to avoid roll-backs and potential refunds under either of the above situations. Kent School District Sot-Year Capital Facilities Phn April, 2000 pops 27s KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Site Acquisition Cost per Single Family Residence Formula: ((Acres x Cost per Acre)/Facility Capacity)x Studerd Generation Factor Rewired Site Acretpe Aw W Site C Acm Facility Capeo fly Student Factor A 1 (Elementary) 11 so 540 0.515 $0.00 A 2 (Junior High) 21 $0 1,065 0.197 $0.00 A 3 (Senior High) 27 $D 1,650 0.180 $0.00 A S0.00 Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Single Family Residence Formula: ((Facility Cost/Facility Capacity)x Student Factor)x(Permenent/Total Square F2ft Ratio) Consmoc ion Cost Fetdkty Cam oft Sludem Facer Footage Ratio B 1 (Elementary) $9,011,914 540 0.515 0.96 58,250.91 B 2 (Junior High) $21.695.026 1,065 0.197 0.96 $3.852.73 B 3 (Sensor High) $0 1,650 0.180 0.96 $0.00 0.892 B—> $12.103.63 Temporary Facility Cost per Single Family Residence Formula: ((Facilay,Cool Facility C )x Student Factor)x(Temporary/Total Square Footage Ratio) FeWxy Coal Facing Cape* Student Feelor Foobge Ralb C 1 (Elementary) $78.504 25 0.515 0.04 $64.69 C 2 (Junior High) $78.504 29 0.197 0.04 $21.33 C 3 (Senior High) $78,504 31 0.180 0.04 $18.23 0.892 C—> $104.25 za� State Match Credit per Single Family Residence Formula: Boeckh Index x BPI Square Footage x Distnet Match% x Student Factor �.. 8oeekh Index SPI Footage Dialrit:t Match% Student Factor D t (Elementary) $101.27 80 0 0.515 $0.00 D 2 (Junior High) $101.27 113.33 0 0.197 S0.00 D 3 (Senior High) S101.27 120 0 0.180 $0.00 D—> $0.00 Tax Credit per Single Family Residence Average Residential Assessed Value $176,547 Current Debt Service Tax Rate $2.32 Bond Buyer Index Interest Rate 5.94% Discount Period (10 Years) 10 TC—> $3.021.66 Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility/Site Value Dwelling UnRs 0 0 FC—> 0 Fee Recap A a She Acquisition per SF Residence $0.00 B = Permanent Facility Coat per Residence $12.103.83 C = Temporary Facility Cost per Residence $104.25 Subtotal S12,207.09 D = State Match Credit per Residence $0.00 TC=Tax Credit per Residence $3,021.66 Subtotal $3,021.66 Total Unfunded Need $9.186.23 ^ Developer Fee Obligation $4.593.11 FC■Facility Credt Of applicable) 0 District Ad?A*rW t (See Pegs 27a for explla scion) (5810.65) Net Fee Obligaion per Single Family Residence S3,782.46 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Aprii 2000 Page 26 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for MULTIFAMILY RESIDENCE Site Acquisition Cost per Mufti.Fantlly Residence Unit Formula: ((Acres x Cost per Acre)/Facility Capaetty)x Student Generation Factor Required SiN AAMOV I Awrag a SN Co ulAas I Facility Capacity Student Fans A 1 (Elementary) 11 so 540 0.279 $0.00 A 2 (Junior High) 21 $0 1.055 0.086 S0.00 A 3 (Senior High) 27 so 1,650 0.063 $0.00 A—> $0.00 Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Multi-Family Residence Unit Formula: ((Facility Cost/FwAity Capacity)x Student Factor)x(Permanent/Total Square F Ratio) Construckm Cost FwA ty Capeeq Student Fsow Footage Ratio 81 (Elementary) $9.011$14 540 0.279 0.96 S4,469.91 62 (Junior High) $21,06,026 1,065 0.086 0M $1.681.90 B 3 (Savior High) So 1,t150 0.053 0.96 $0.00 0.428 B—> S6.151.81 a®� Temporary Facility Cod per Mukifamily Residence Unit Formula: ((Facility Cod/Facility Capattty)x Student Factor)x(Temporary/Total Square F Ratio) FaCNV Cost FedltM CaPoWly Show Facw Footepa Ratio C 1 (Elementary) ST8,504 25 0.270 0.04 S35.04 C 2 (Junior High) $78,504 29 0.086 0.04 $9.31 C 3 (Senior High) 578,504 31 0.053 0.04 $6.38 0.426 G--> S50.74 amm� State Match Credit per Multifamily Residence Unit Formula: Boeckh Index x SPI Sgtun F x District Match% x Student Factor eoecah I I SPI Fame" Diabid Match% Student Factor D 1 (Elementary) $101.27 80 0 0.279 S0.00 '"1 0 2 (Junior High) $101.27 113,33 0 0.056 $0.00 D 3 (Senior High) 3101.27 120 0 0.063 $0.00 D—> $0.00 Tax Credit per Multi-Famity Residence Unit Avenge Resitlential Assessed Value S56.029 Current Debt Service Tax Rate $2.32 Bond Buyer Index Annul Interest Rate 5.94% Discotad Period (10 Yeas) 10 TC—> $959.44 Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility/Site Value pock Units 0 0 FC--> 0 Fee Recap A a Site Acquisition per Multi-Family Unit $0.00 8 a Permanent Facility Cost per MF Unk $6,151.61 C a Temporary Facility Cost per MF Unit 550.74 Subtotal S6 202 55 D a State Match Credit per MF Unit $0.00 TC a Tax Credit per MF Unit S959.44 Subtotal S9S9.44 Total Unfunded Need S5,243.11 Developer Fee Obiption S2.621.55 FC a Facility Credit(d appliable) 0 Diettiel A4uWnWt (See Pope 27a for"potion) (5292.06) 1 Not Fee Obligation per Muki-Fancily Residence Unit 32,329.49 Kent Scttod District Sot-Year Capital FaeWin Plan April 2000 Pap 29 la Appendixes Appendix A: Calculations of Capacities for Elementary Schools Appendix B: Calculations of Capacities for Junior High Schools n Appendix C: Calculations of Capacities for Senior High Schools Appendix D: Use of Relocatables Appendix E: Student Generation Factor Survey Appendix F: Summary of Changes to 1999 Capital Facilities Plan n Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April,yppp A a W :;`.: � � � � f � Iff 1D N f m f 1�I1 f �D N N �0 � N m N = � � N f Y1 f N yf 100 �• O a .� N C 79 J O r5 W „ E R < C U. E We o e p p p p e p q �f p H W r m H m 8 S 2 N S O H S S 2 4 8 n S S 8 O N O 8 8 9 S g �~p � E LL w N n N O 1�1 N n �y w 8 �C q �yp� pw I�l �VpI N O tp Q V1 a LL V n w N dt N N e Yl I�fl t0 VNI Vb N IA • f 11� `�' W)j w Q o 'E f f f N f 1'f N N f ° ui O O m V Y:i w Tn _ i `o a j U u W m N f Q f o r! e p V v d :' W z ° ej J Q a _ • N f f f f f f N V, Z w f !f v N N v v f f in f dfj J O H a E IL ° Z d ° W = a o 0 0 o O s R 5 Q d h LL s W ►- g Y Q ! � V A A f N A f N !) f N f N � A A N f N � f N N N � A A N A � • �Fs E Q : ppp pp1if yy�� in op p p p pin s� Q •+ f f f v N f f = f f f fa N f N f f N 0 N H f N P1 0 o x � F " N O ry e ' w p� N en o �O N N o o w N f .T W _ 9 �� w '- � � N N N N N � N � N y e S Z N V E E M �! p p a y < c�i u c°� c3i '6' W W CY9 p `f' y. Y Z d y y to N a J w a Cxo) lu LOU U._ `` d ;r7 Y to fo 10 A w ui a 4A Y LU Lu to LU LLI o LU Lu CD LL, 0 in in fa lz gn CD LU I LB IL IX z 0 UJ a 40 r. CD 40 IL X z Lu CL M 6 to z 0 Lu > In a fo fD 40 fa In 0 0 go 0 2 z on u lC 4E 0 0 40 E < U O. c uj LU ch m j3 w v %n In In v C A in c :ft i- MD to IV Io s An x n go NC le u U ui L) no: CL cow CD 0 E 'E A E Sc w L a fa LO IE 22 x x g ;A L) to 'E 0 Clt \ § } } _ ! Lo -7\ C4 I} —7 —7 \ } in 40 \ I} \ § ■ . , V4 LQ — \ I} ° LLI o OD � k a I} � � � § � ! } � , _ LLI ui cn U) z LU X co . � \ 'E } a I} . ° � ob CL \ B � � ( • . � \ t I t 3 IV go ■ cc W CL pg�L N n N n • � m N n w m b N n 0 P w O� m N � 0 N O m N N w .'I n N N w {p ef n r $ M O ^ lyv n � � ti ^ • ^1 � � N � O � A 0 r N w n • O 1�pp mm pp�� n N b m {O N 0 0 C 06 0 O O 0 o 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p r - r c O O < V yd„ o n n u n n �i $i g m • w !QU. QQ C '7 c r c ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o e o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o p L C A A d C p� edci E �e�pp� m o� • nnn e•.i « n e a a r d N f N • m N Vl • inN • .w el R ♦ ID b 17 i n! N N n N n N N N w n (jJ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � G W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 d C 7 y 0y� m n p n N n p ♦ n w w a n N d !Q N - m w �np w �p o a N co O� N w n O oo yy�� ep� n N pq N m a N w oy �p Oi f y� N M N n Omi �Ntf 0 0 m m 0 N O O w O P O� w O� O O� m d n N PI w •�I O O O b �- 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p F o 0 0 0 0 00, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m pp ��pp ♦ w q n m p (� � O ♦ N N � m n N � n ♦ a n 1'• P/ n �j (n n n O N w pp m m b W m m N m . = N m ' N ' ^ m mm qq H y ' O� O •p N O� w = ' b O� O \A r N m N N N N N N N N N m n n 1�'1 n m r 7 A N N N N N C c Zd w n w • a N O W U E W fa LL •q. T ry $ O O N 1•'! �p n ' O m �r N 1^'O N • m a N b n O _ F ^ • q O N n O N YI f�l w w N O N m n N N N X r C • t Z I w occ �; ^nD CMQ a O U 23 U J C' 3 C W JJ U C1 W U E •S� C 4� �1 2 W Y G O a LL W Ix W 19 - M Y � m � o a w0 Cc ~ ~ 8 c c C1� C t0 a d E to cl d E � O qg cl y C O .` 7 L O �{ 0 d d O a) 0a d .. �r S €€ = E c $ � d Y � oc c 0 b cd �' � Mcaci E a LL m � E .� pcd£ Eac, � acrdEJS g Y m OdLO _ Ea0 WCcraq10rii ya W cN A N �i ad e0 m yEtl rm eD Ol 4' I I its a � c « r� pC • a p�y y b N c W d °' = LL c c Ch y d Ga .}<$C IL TL 3d S c ip 0 `o p Li c c w d ee d }� 2r g � a V W 0 d � � C c c r Qd o� E gQ 9 � grow e a N O0'�U' � voodWe � � Oad � ENV t C � ro �'i � cm 0 A ; e , m °O >�i c E = v doh aE d a, A O l0 W L d 9 Ci 0 3 :.. W 7 QUUULLLLLLSJ .Jad' LY (AfANNI- H � Qp mUULLS � ' J � MN q W W 8 u N e Y Appendix F - Summary of Changes to April 1999 Capital Facilities Plan The Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") is updated annually based on previous Plans in effect since 1993. The primary changes from the April 1999 Plan are summarized here. Kent Elementary #27a opened in January, 1999 to replace the original Kent Elementary. The original Kent Elementary building is being leased out and its capacity is no longer included in the Plan. Emerald Park Elementary#29 opened in September, 1999. Millennium Elementary 030 is under construction and is scheduled to open in August, 2000. Changes to capacity continue to reflect reduction in class size for grades K - 3 as well as annual program changes. Changes in portables or transitional capacity reflect purchase, sale, surplus and/or movement of portables between facilities. Permanent facility costs have been adjusted to reflect averages of costs for schools built most recently. The district expects to receive no state matching funds for schools in this Plan and tax credit factors are updated annually. Unfunded facility needs are pending voter approval. Impact fee calculations include a "District Adjustment" which is equal to the amount of increase that the impact fee formulas drive out for this year. See page 27a for further explanation. Student enrollment forecast is updated annually. Changes to Impact Fee Calculation Factors include: ITEM FROM TO Comments Student Generation Factor EM M 0.512 0.515 upmw in 19W Plan Single Family(SF) Jr 0.188 0.197 Sr 0.140 0.180 TOM 0.840 0.892 Student Generation Factor Elam 0235 02M updow in INN Pim Mufti-Family(MF) Jr 0.000 0.016 Sr 0.002 0.083 Tool 0.377 0.428 State Match 55.e4% 0% up ow in low Plan Boeckh Index(Coat per square foot) 309A 3 $101 s7 Per SPl Average Assessed Valuation 8F s/82,224 $176.547 Per Pu9d sours ESD AV-Average of Condominiums&Apts. MF i47.0M 356,020 Per Pu9d Sand ESD Debt Service Tax Rate 3297 $= Per 94 court'Aseu w General Obligation Bond Interest Rate 5.11% SAM 01 'a Rela Impact Fee-Single Family SF $3,782 $3.782 No dawpNo lm Impact Fee- Mufti-Family MF 52.329 s2.329 Nodiwipetofin � Karr Schad Dbrrid Sba-Yar Capital Facadn Plan APPENM F April 20M Ppe 3A l Wn Schoo deray . . . � strict No . 214 RECEIVED. AUG PLANNING Dc"rnnTM^'i1T .. 1999/00 Capital Facilities Plan or the 21st Centug Bunai f FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN �1 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999100 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN BOARD OF EDUCATION Audrey Germanis Linda Hendrickson Holly Isaman Ann Murphy Jim Storvick SUPERINTENDENT Thomas R.Murphy "1 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999100 CAPI•TAL FACILITIES PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS........................................ INTRODUCTION.............................. "' SECTION I THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Introduction............................................................. I Inventory of Educational Facilities............................. 2 Inventory of Non-Instructional Facilities.................... 3 Needs Forecast-Existing Facilities.......................... 4 Needs Forecast- New Facilities.............................. 5 Six Year Finance Plan.............................................. 6 SECTION 2 MAPS OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES Introduction............................................................. 7 Map-Elementary Boundaries.................... 8 Map-Junior Higli Boundaries.................... 9 Map- Senior High Boundaries................... 10 SECTION 3 SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION Introduction............................................................. I 1 Building Capacities................................................... 12-13 Portable Locations................................................... 14-15 Student Forecast...................................................... 16-18 Capacity Summaries................................................. 19-23 King County Impact Fee Calculations....................... 24-26 SECTION 4 SUMMARY OF CHANGES FROM THE 1998/99 PLAN 27-29 ii FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999100 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN INTRODUCTION in response to the requirements of the State of Washington Growth Management Act (SHB 2929 (1990) and ESHB 1025 (1991)), and under the School Impact Fee Ordinances of Mncy County Code 21A, City of Federal Way Ordinance No. 95-249 effective December 21, 1995 as amended, and the City of Kent Ordinance No. 3260 effective March 1996, Federal Way Public Schools has updated its 1998/99 Capital Facilities Plan as of May 2000. This Plan has been adopted by King County, the City of Kent and the City of Federal Way and is incorporated in the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction by reference. This plan is also included in the Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. To date, the City of Auburn and City of Des Moines have not adopted a school impact fee ordinance. The Growth Management Act requires the County to designate Urban Growth areas within which urban growth can be encouraged. The Growth Management Planning Council adopted and recommended to the King County Council four Urban Growth Area Line Maps with designations for urban centers. A designation was made within the Federal Way planning area, which encompasses Federal Way Public Schools boundaries. King County will encourage and actively support the development of Urban Centers to meet the region's need for housing, jobs, services, culture and recreation. This Plan's estimated population growth is prepared with this underlying assumption. 1"� This Capital Facilities Plan will be used as documentation for any jurisdiction, which requires its use to meet the needs of the Growth Management Act. This plan is not intended to be the sole planning tool for all of the District needs. The District may prepare interim plans consistent with Board policies. Additional plans will be consistent with the six year Capital Facilities Plan. iii FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN INTRODUCTION (continued) On October 12, 1998 the Board of Education approved a recommendation to move to a Pre K-5 elementary,6-8 middle school, and 9-12 high school grade configuration beginning in the fall of 2002 or as additional high school space allows. This grade configuration is believed to be more responsive to student needs. It will allow for smaller elementary enrollments with room for lower primary class sizes. The middle school allows two-year preparation for the WA State 7 h grade test,matches the Federal Wav Public Schools 8`h grade gateway test,and matches most western Washington districts. Middle schools are also thought to be a better way to address the needs of adolescence in a period of transition from elementary to school to high school. The four-year high school plan combines the 9-12 graduation credit system, allows two-year preparation from the 10`h grade test, and physically places the high school students together. Federal Way Public Schools must meet the needs of a growing student and community population. The District must be flexible with building, programs and staffing to meet the needs of the 21"Century, while being financially responsible and sensitive to the current tax rates. A flexible,cost effective and educationally beneficial approach that integrates academics and high tech/high skill preparation is needed. By extending the existing debt and creatively using new and existing facilities, the District can meet these complex needs with no increase in local tax rates. Federal Way citizens approved a bond proposal of$83 million on May 18, 1999. This bond will provide for a comprehensive high school ($44 million); a middle school ($17 million); expansion and improvement of existing schools ($9 million);replacement of Truman High School ($6 million) and other general improvements ($7 million). Additional planned improvements included in the bond proposal.are: parking and pedestrian safety,playgrounds and sports fields, new classroom start-up and music equipment, information systems and networks and emergency communications. Federal Way Public Schools opened the Internet Academy in the 1996/97 school year. This program currently serves approximately 710 students,487 are full time students. Internet Academy has grown from about 60 students to the current 700 in three years. The forecast for growth in this program is to serve approximately 750 full time students by the year2005. Internet Academy is currently operating out of leased space consisting of administrative areas and a computer lab area. Additionally, some lab sections are scheduled in the current high school facilities during non-school hours. There is an anticipated need of approximately 2000 square feet of additional space over the next two years. This capacity is not included in the analysis of instructional spaces. The facility needs are unique to a program of"distance learners". iv FEDERAL NVAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999100 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN The Marketing Academy School operated in Federal Way for two years from 1997 to 1999. As the District evaluated this program, it was determined that the program was not meeting the needs of students in the most effective manner. The Marketing Academy School has not operated this year and there are no plans to start the program in the near future. Federal Way Public Academy opened in the 1999/00 school year in six portables on the Illahee Junior High site. The school served 120 seventh and eigth grade students this year and will serve 180—210 students in grades seven, eight and nine in the 2000/2001 school year. One additional single wide and one double wide portable will be moved to the site during the summer of 2000. --1 v SECTION 1 THE CAPTIAL FACILITIES PLAN FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999100 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 1 -THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN The State Growth Management Act requires that several pieces of information be gathered to determine the facilities available and needed to meet the needs of a growing community. This section provides information about current facilities, existing facility needs, and expected future facility requirements for Federal Way Public Schools.This is followed by a Financial Plan which shows expected funding for any new construction, portables and update modernization needs listed. 1 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999100 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN �. INVENTORY OF EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES ELENMN7ARY SCHOOLS Adelaide 1635 SW 304th Street Federal Way 98023 Brigadoon 3601 SW 336th Street Federal Way 98023 Camelot 4041 S 298th Street Auburn 98001 Enterprise 35101 5th Avenue SW Federal Way 98023 Green Gables 32607 47th Avenue SW Federal Way 98023 Lake Dolloff 4200 S 308th Street Auburn 98001 Lake Grove 303 SW 308th Street Federal Way 98023 Lakeland 35675 32nd Avenue S Auburn 99001 Mark Twain 2450 S Star Lake Road Federal Way 98003 Meredith Hill 5830 S 300th Street Auburn 98001 Mirror Lake 625 S 314th Street Federal Way 98003 Nautilus 1000 S 289th Street Federal Way 99003 Olympic View 2626 SW 327th Street Federal Way 98023 Panther Lake 34424 1st Avenue S Federal Way 98003 Rainier View 3015 S 368th Street Federal Way 98003 Sherwood Forest 34600 12th Avenue SW Federal Way 98023 Silver Lake 1310 SW 325th Place Federal Way 98023 Star Lake 4014 S 270th Street Kent 99032 Sunnycrest 24629 42nd Avenue S Kent 98032 Twin Lakes 4400 SW 320th Street Federal Way 98023 �^ Valhalla 27847 42nd Avenue S Auburn 98001 Wildwood 2405 S 300th Street Federal Way 98003 Woodmont 26454 16th Avenue S. Des Moines 98199 ,NNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS Federal Way Public Academy 36001 1" Ave S Federal Way 99003 Illahee 36001 1st Avenue S Federal Way 98003 Kilo 4400 S 308th Street Auburn 98001 Lakota 1415 SW 314th Street Federal Way 98023 Sacajawea 1101 S Dash Point Road Federal Way 98003 Saghalie 33914 19th Avenue SW Federal Way 98023 Totem 26630 40th Avenue S Kent 99032 SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS Decatur 2800 SW 320th Street Federal Way 98023 Federal Way 30611 16th Avenue S Federal Way 98003 Thomas Jefferson 4248 S 288th Street Auburn 98001 ALTERNATIVE SCHOOLS Merit School 31455 28th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Harry S Truman High School 31455 28th Ave S Federal Way 98003 LEASED SPACE Internet Academy 32020 lu Ave S Federal Way 98003 2 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CURRENT INVENTORY NON-INSTRUCTIONAL FACILITIES Developed Property Administrative Building 31405 18th Avenue S Federal Way 98003 MOT Site 1066 S 320th Street Federal Way 98003 Central Kitchen 1344 S 308th Street Federal Way 98003 Federal Way Memorial Field 1300 S 308th Street Federal Way 98003 Leased Space Community Resource Center 1928 S Sea Tac Mall Federal Way 98003 Security Offices 30819 14'' Ave S Federal Way 98003 Undeveloped Property Site# Location 91 27'Avenue SW &Dash Point Road 23 SW 360th Street&3rd Avenue SW 35 S 351st Street &52nd Avenue S ^� 40 E of loth Avenue SW Between SW 334th &SW 335th Streets 63 E of 47th Avenue SW &SW 314th Place 71 S 344th Street&46th Avenue S 72 36600 block of Pacific Highway S 84 3737 S 360th Street 85 Wh Ave S and S 364a'Way 96 S 308th Street& 14th Avenue S Notes: Not all undeveloped propenies are large enough to meet school construction requirements. Properties may be traded or sold depending on what locations are needed to house students in the District. There is a pending sale on this property. 3 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN NEEDS FORECAST-EXISTING FACILITIES EXISTING FACILITY FUTURE NEEDS ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF FUNDS Truman High School Modernization with expansion (1) Purchase and Relocate Interim Capacity (1) Portables Decatur High School,Federal Expansion (1) Way High School and Thomas Jefferson High School Various School Sites Parking Safety;Network (2) Upgrades; Automated Libraries; Elementary Playgrounds; High School Sports•Fields; Emergency Communications. �- Notes: (1) Anticipated source of funds is state matching funds,Impact Fees, future bond issues and/or non-voted debt issues. (2) Anticipated source of funds is future bond issues. 4 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999100 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN NEEDS FORECAST -NEW FACILITIES NEW FACILITY LOCATION ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF FUNDS New Senior High School Site 85(I) (2) New Middle School Unknown (2) Notes: (1) Site 85 is the designation for the new senior high school This site,purchased in 2000 is located at 161h Ave S and S 364`h Way(District maps will be updated to reflect location). (2)Anticipated source of funds is state matching funds,Impact Fees, future bond issues and/or non-voted debt issues. "1 5 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999100 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Six Year Finance Plan Secured Fundinv Sources 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Total Revenue impactFees(1) S250,000 S462,706 S250,000 5952,7p; Land Sale Funds(2) S500,000 S750.0001 SS73,215 S500,000 Bond Funds(3) S9,000.000 TOTAL S9,730,0001 S1.212,7061 S823.2151 S500.000 Sol SO SL':95,721 Unsecured Funding Sources State Match Funds(5) S7.000.00 Band or Lew Funds(3) 574,000,00 Land Fund Sales(6) 5800,00 Impact Fees(4) SI,500,00 (TOTAL 583.300,000 NEW SCHOOLS 2000 1 2001 2002 1 2003 2004 1 2005 Total Cast New Middle School S2,000,000 S3,000,00N S12,000,000 S17,000,000i New Senior High School S1.700.000 S10,400,000 S 17,900,000 S10,800,000 S40,800,000i_ New Senior High School Site S31a00,000 33,200,000 MODERNIZATION AND EXPANSION Truman Senior High(Alternative) S500.0001 S3,500,000 S2,000,000 S6-000-00 11 Expansion Thrcc High Schools S700.0001 S6,800,00 S7.500,000I Expansion Elementary Schools S100,000 S1,500,000 S1,600,000 TEMPORARY FACILITIES ' {Portables(7) S362,245 S241,497 5603,74� { OTHER Safety improvements(8a) S1,400,000 S1,600,00 53,000,00 School Improvements(8b) S1,800,000 $1,300,000 S300,000 $600,000 54,000,00 Facilities Department S250,0001 S2S0,QD0 S250,000 S250,000 S250,000 S250,000 S1,500,00 TOTAL S9,912,245 S23,8S0,000 S20,691,497 S13,750,000 54,750,000 512,25D,000 585.203,74 NOTES: 1. These[mare currently being held in a King County.City of Federal way and city of Kent impact fee account,and will be available for use by the District for system improvements. 2. These funds come from various sales of land and arc set aside for estimated expenditures. 3. These funds will be used for future projects. - 4. These are projected fees based upon known residential developments in the District over the next six years. 5. These funds arc projected state matching funds. 6. Thesc funds are projected land sale income. 7 These fees represent the cost of moving and siting existing portables and'purchasing new portables. The District may choose to purchase new portables in the years shown—This estimate may also include the cost of purchasing these portables. Sa,These projects have been approved by the Board of Directors and cover most schools. These projects do not increase capacity. These projecu inccude parting and pedestrian salary improvements at IS elementary schools. 8b.These projects have been approved by the Board of Directors and cover most schools. These projects do not increase capacity. These projects include:school networks,information and library systems:new classroom start up;elementary playgrounds and high school spoor freids; music equipment:emergency communication. 6 SECTION 2 MAPS OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 2 - MAPS OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES Federal Way Public Schools (the District) has twenty-three elementary schools (grades K-6), seven junior high schools (grades 7.9), three senior high schools (grades 10-12) and two alternative schools (grades 7-12) for the 1999/00 school year. On April 20, '1996 the Federal Way Public Schools Board of Education adopted the boundaries for these schools. The following maps show the service area boundaries for each school for each grade level (Harry S. Truman High School, Merit School, Internet Academy and Federal Way Public Academy serve students from throughout the District). The identified boundaries are reviewed annually. Any change in grade configuration or adoption of programs which affect school populations may necessitate a change in school service areas. The Growth Management Act requires that a jurisdiction evaluate if the public facility infrastructure is in place to handle new housing developments. In the case of most public facilities, new development has its major impact on the facilities immediately adjacent to that development. School Districts are different. If the District does not have permanent facilities available, interim measures must be taken until new facilities can be built or until boundaries can be adjusted to match the population changes to the surrounding facilities. Adjusting boundaries requires careful consideration by the District and is not taken lightly. It is. recognized that there is a potential impact on students who are required to change schools. Boundary adjustments impact the whole district,not just one school. It is important to realize that a single housing development does not require the construction of a complete school facility. School districts are required to project growth throughout the district and build or adjust boundaries based on growth throughout the district, not just around a single development. 7 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL BOUNDARIES ff �..� _.ter..G ki =EDERAL WAY SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 210 LEMENTARY SCHOOLS JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS t""(•� ..__�'f" t ode- Code•• ■ 1 � - 0 Adelaide CA 6e Illah" E-9 6 BnOsdoen B+ 66 Kilo Gi ;• r{ _ . ? 3 Camelot G3 62 Lakota Di I: ,•= .�'J• 2 Enterprise D-9 61 Sacals"a ES a Green Gables A-7 70 Saghalm CA .0 Lake DelloR GA 66 Totem I lake Grove Di a Merit F< ,.•,w... •• - :2 Lakeland F•9 I t l _ ;i• �' _ 2 Mark Twain F-4 i •_{�,, •j :z :9 Meredith Mill HS SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS - ^! 6 Mirror Lake E-6 J S Nautilus E-3 Code•• t S Olympic View C•7 '• �- : Ir.� a Panther Lab E-4 60 Decatur C; I7 Rainier View F-10 61 Federal Way ES .t Sherwood Forest Dd S3 Thomas JNraraon GA 16 Sur ••: '•« -'! �« `. I i .weww r rr•airw :a Su Lake D-7 6 Marry S.T7uman FA - ...... , I ,_p. r Lake G-0 6 Mom Fi � . •.......... :3 Sunnycrest G-2 ' i •� •t'•• 0•-• '3 Twin Lakes Bi t :7 Valhalla 0-1 Future School Sltas— J 7 Wildwood F3 Surplus Sites — i •:' - ' .. '< •- �• t Woedmom F-2 - •-r it t' - 00 Educational Service Center Fi _ 39 Future Support Services E4 _ Ceee--■ I !'I :t. 37 Mamlanante-0peraeeM•TBMper000n Ei - I Parka- •• p.er..•j t ,t `� � •� 11.9 EOERAL WAY, WASNfNGTON and VICIN17 `• .q � Itli ar -t• F�r.•. ,. .i l/'...,�,...��, i��, t •_f}„v`I'1L!� 13j, 1 ALL- w :: +.•.t,�L�• y•i .• t; F: -t.. . ^�� ' ` � � r :�>+% it ` � i � •I ti - • 1 � ri :I• P ! .+� •: e 7 e - s ►s.•.� - 7 7te2I- . �.. t i i � as .e iM•e i i r • 9 rr.r rwna na. y .j n ' ` y•".r n. t y r 9 1 • • ////'///��,� I j� r 'a 5' a ff•J ``� ,; a •7 I•�r 1 FWAY EDERAL :-' _ T I�. r_, s€ — : to �7 7.r• r.Hw i ayl � e.-..a,«... (253) 945-2000 rr-iw�w i:r� 11 I E I •� I GC..� !F 8 Junior High School Boundaries f ERAL WAY SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 210 " ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS JUNIOR NIGH SCHOOLS �' (_ Code- ■ Code.. . 19 Adelaide CA 64 IIIah" E•9 j '.' " Aj 16 Bngadoon BS 66 Kilo 26 Camelot GS 62 Laketa DS e I 22 Enterprise 0.9 61 Sacajasrea E•5 14 Green Gables A•T 70 Saglslr• CS •• - 30 Lake Dolla" GS 63 TPtem G-3 ei,,-„•, ; - - 11 Lake Grove D4 6 Merit FS r-••^ "'1ei� ! 33 Lakeland F-9 f 2 Mark Twain FA 29 Meredith Hill H-3 SENIOR NIGH SCHOOLS 6 Mirror Lake ES , 5 Nautilus ES cod...■ I 13 Olympic ViewC-7 �• j'•'i 21 Panther Lake ES Do Decatur CS i Y i • i 37 Ramer Yew F•10 61' Federal way E•5 ;( .- 41 Sherwood Forest 04 63 Thomas JMarson GA •,"• al,i.: 1= 24 Silver Lake D•7 6 Harry S.Truman Fi •i• ',,i •( r 7-y;•.P:-C. k 26 Star Lake G•7 6 Merit F•6 •.fir••„�: ,r„•y,,: 25 Sunnycmt G•2 13 Twhn Lakes 8•6 27 Valhalla G•s Future School Sites— •- 1 ':"'' •- 7 wildwood FS Surplus Sites ',[�1�..�. �•' A I•' 100 Educational Service Center F; _ ';,"' •,. .. .I S s •.a 99 Future Support Soften Ea _ Code-- 97 Maintananoe-0perabone•Trensporration E; ,,,.• •;;' +• • I �' 1 parks- D p.r _ - ._ 1+ •II • t S T FEDERAL WAY. WASHINGTON and WCINI -'` r - -.� •` �`� _ AL 9 e.-•W • i ha` `•F S14 l., •� i w. 1•• i� : • i $ :v ,p ii •N.w•au-er f a j J ' • 1 1 • s i .w •9 ` � ' •Y - — fir% , + , h D is FEDERAL = _: a _' ..•� WAY -�. ' _. vu•..e10 s Flr•+w, (253) 945-2000 6i k•w s ' .e. 9 Senior High School Boundaries E f �..... ................ h FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 210 i •" ' ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS Cods• Cods,• 10 Adelaide CA 94 NI E-9 j `• ° - 19 Nnpfdoon 83 96 Kilo Gi 2 ` ."' ht - .• 2 39 Camelot G3 92 Laketa DS 22 Enterprise D-9 N Saujawea E•S - ta Green Wales A-7 70 5891 C-a 30 Lake Dolloff GS 93 Town G-3 ,,,•,,,• 11 Lake Grove Di 9 Merit FS ""•• 33 Lakeland F•9 - 2 Mark Twain FS 29 Meredith Mill MS SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS 3 9 Minor Lake ES i .- 5 Nautilus ES Collis- 15 Olymple View C•7 L 21 Panther Lake Ei 90 Decatur CS 1 37 Rainier New F•10 91' Federel Way E-S 41 Sherwood Forest, Di 93 TMestas Jalhrson GA ' .ae« i ^ 24 Silwr Lake 0-79 Marry S.Truman FS •'•' ••7 , ; -y 26 Star Lake GJ ! Ms1N Fi •_/F•' .. he...Sr. 25 Sunnyemt G-2 �•,' -- 13 Twin Laks Bi ��c d 27 Valhalla GA FuMm School Sit"- •,:I - .� �. 4 7 Whdwoed FS Surplus Sites - ' 1 Wo' ont F.1 sw 100 Educational Belles CaMlr F< ,•:' '% ..e ' 99 Future Support SeMps EJ Code--. ' w•' !9!h ^ fT Malmommn Opmtiorr•Trer000fudon E-4 �..••' •�I Parke- .;. D'�• - !h ate i 5 as ,fEDERA[ WAY. WASN/NGTON►nd'WC/N/ i f,+• - ` •. T •�' •' « 1 t o a r ,+, i r•,sht ` r ` a .wav � �— ^•a• w ' { •-' r — I a w to I' •_::ar•tits 'T — 1 w '� ' � ' ` �• ■■G i' ! I W* Y 1 $ •rra..ewar. Li Li• • �� 7 •, r /v i i fi w eel, a h w •`r' I i f a .r.iwMa a - a FEDERALI +. Will 10 - i :f t ; /d w6h im rum"&rad� (253) 9"-2000 ° w••• ! • I a� rw r....a.. 1/ .'• E wa I •� G .. •'�'.H rrarew.a.r 10 SECTION 3 SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 3-SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION Building Capacities-The Education Program Portable Locations Student Forecast-2000 through 2005 Capacity Summaries King County Impact Fees-Single and Multi Family Units 11 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999100 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Building Capacities This Capital Facilities Plan establishes the District's "standard of service" in order to ascertain the District's current and future capacity. The Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, but these guidelines do not take into consideration the education program needs. The District has identified a Building Program Capacity for each of the schools in the District. This Full Time Equivalent (FIE) capacity is based on: • The number of classrooms available in each school • Any special requirements at each school • The contracted class load by grade level In general, the District's current standard provides that the average class size for a standard classroom for grade K is 24 students , for grades 1-6 is 26 students and grades 7-12 is 25 students. Gate (Gifted and Talented Education) classrooms are 25 students, individual education programs classrooms are 15 students, and special education classrooms are 12 students. This size is determined based upon current ratios and trends as well as the classroom physical size. Educational Program Capacities change every year. This analysis is for the 1999100 school year. The capacity of an individual school could and does change at any time depending on program changes which may require additional space. 12 FEDERALWAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999100 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITIES ELEMENTARY BUILDING JUNIOR HIGH BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY PROGRAM CAPACITY Adelaide 488 Illahee $21 Brigadoon 528 Kilo 854 Camelot 374 Lakota 741 Enterprise 5I2 Sacajawea 826 Green Gables 494 Saghalie 768 Lake Dolloff 4 2 Totem 709 Lake Grove 476 Lakeland IMM1 Mark Twain 503 Meredith Hill 498 Junior High Average 78 i Mirror Lake 398 Nautilus 542 SENIOR HIGH BUILDING Olympic View 450 PROGRAM CAPACITY Panther Lake 514 Rainier View 469 Decatur 1,165 Sherwood Forest $50 Federal Way 1,394 Silver Lake 528 ThomasJefferson 1,373 Star Lake 502 Sunnycrest 462 1998 TOTAL 3,932 win Lakes Valhalla 494 Senior High Average 1,3II '1 Wildwood 428 Woodmont 450 ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY TOTAL , Merit Schoof 16 Elementary Average 484 Truman High School 194 1998 TOTAL 210 Notes: Elementary program capacities are based on the number of teaching stations in the building,contracted class size,and special use classrooms in place daring the 99/00 school year. All available instructional space is calculated. Secondary program capacities are based on peak loading. The calculation is based on 25 students per available teaching stations. Capacities were calculated by the Study and Survey Committee. 3.3 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS I999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Portable Locations The Washington State Constitution requires the State to provide each student a basic education. It is not efficient use of District resources to build a school with a capacity for 500 students due to tack of space for 25 students when enrollment fluctuates throughout the year and from year to year. Portables are used as temporary facilities or interim measures to house students until permanent facilities can be built or boundary adjustments can be made. When permanent facilities become available, the portable(s) is either moved to another school for an interim classroom, or used for other purposes such as storage or child care programs. Some portables may not be fit to move due to age or physical condition. In these cases, the District may choose to buy new portables and surplus these unfit portables. It is the practice and philosophy of Federal Way Public Schools that portables are not acceptable as permanent facilities. The following page provides a list of the location of the portable facilities, used for temporary educational facilities by Federal Way Public Schools. 14 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999100 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PORTABLE LOCATIONS PORTABLES LOCATED PORTABLES LOCATED AT ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS AT SENIOR HIGHS FOX SOX atncenOXAt nrlwceno�AL 91MUMOXAL aarncenONAL Adelaide 3 Decatur 4 Brigadoon 1 Federal ay 1 Camelot 1 Thomas Jefferson Enterprise 2 Truman/Merit 8 1 Green Gables 1 a e o o t q Lake Grove 2 Lakeland 2 Mark Twain 3 Meredith Hill 2 PORTABLES LOCATED Mirror Lake 4 AT SUPPORT FACILITIES sun us Olympic View 2 5-Mile Lake 1 Panther Lake 3 MOT 1 Rairrier View 3 Clothing Bank 1 Sherwood Forest 4 Silver Lake 4 TOTAL 3 Star Lake 4 Sunnycrest 1 Twin Lakes 2 1 HEAD START PORTABLES AT DISTRICT SITES.,, } I awoO Woodmont 2 Mirror Lake 1 Sherwood Forest 1 IWIAL Total 2 PORTABLESLOCATED AT JUNIOR HIGHS MOX mROOm0.Wt L'Qn9=004AL Federal Way Public Academy 5 1 Illahee 3 Kilo 3 1 Lakota 3 Sacajawea 2 Saghalie 4 Totem 5 TOTAL 25 2 15 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Student Forecast Student enrollment projections are a basic component of budget development. Enrollment projections influence many of the financial estimates that go into budget preparation. The majority of staffing requirements are derived directly from the forecasted number of students. Allocations for instructional supplies and materials are also made on the basis of projected enrollment. Other expenditures and certain revenue projections are directly related to enrollment projections. Enrollment projections are completed annually in the Business Services Department. Projections must be detailed at various levels, district total, school-building totals, grade level and program level to include vocational and special education students. The basis of projections has been cohort survival analysis. Cohort survival is the analysis of a group that has a common statistical value (grade level) as it progresses through time. In a stable population the cohort would be 1.00 for all grades. This analysis uses historical information to develop averages and project the averages forward. This method does not trace individual students; it is concerned with aggregate numbers in each grade level. The district has used this method with varying years of history and weighted factors to study. several projections. Because transfers in and out of the school system are common, student migration is factored into the analysis as it increases or decreases survival rates. Entry grades (kindergarten) are a unique problem in cohort analysis. The district collects information on birth rates within the district's census tracts, and treats these statistics as a cohort for kindergarten enrollment in the appropriate years. The Federal Way School District is using three distinct methods for projecting student enrollments. The resultant forecasted enrollments are evaluated below. The first method is a statistical cohort analysis that produces ten distinct forecasts. These are forecast of enrollment for one year. The projections vary depending on the number of years of historical information and how they are weighted. The second method uses enrollment-forecasting software tied to a geographic information system. MicroSAMTm software establishes survival, migrant and repeater rates for each grade level in a pre-defined geographic area. These rates are matched to the number of housing units per area. The rates are then used to project the following year's enrollment based on the number of planned new housing-units. The software will project for five years. The third method is a projection using an enrollment projection software package that allows the user to project independently at school or grade level and to aggregate these projections for the district level. The Enrollment Master software provides statistical methods including trend line, standard grade progression (cohort) and combinations of these methods. This software produces a five-year projection of school enrollment. 16 FEDERAL NVAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Short-term budget projections may be more conservative than the standard grade progression model. For the 1999100 school year, the district chose the Enrollment Masters" projection using standard grade progression model. Standard grade progression is a reasonably accurate method for the near term future when the near future looks much like the near past. Long range projections that establish the need for facilities are a modification of the cohort survival method. The cohort method of analysis becomes less reliable the farther out the projections are made. The Federal Way School District long-range projections are studied annually. The study includes information from the jurisdictional demographers as they project future housing and population in the region.The long-range projections used by Federal Way Public Schools reflect a similar age trend in student populations as the projections published by the Office of Financial management for the State of Washington. Growth Management requires jurisdictions to plan for a minimum of twenty years. The Federal Way School District is a,panner in this planning with the various jurisdictions comprising the school district geography. These projections create a vision of the school district in the future. 17 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Full Time Equivalent Enrollment History and Projections Simplified FTE(K Headcount-.5 FTE;Junior High FTE-.989 Headcount;Senior High FT£-.932 Headcount) Tot2lK-12 Percent School Year Elementary Junior High Senior High FTE Change 1993-94 10,545 4,432 3,750 18,727 1994-95 10,505 4,626 3,758 18,889 0.9% 1995-96 10,689 4,838 3.796 19,323 2.2% 1996-97 10.863 4,930 3,90 19,706 1.9% 1997.98 11,123 5,073 4,032 20,278 2.8% 1998-99 11,480 5,080 4,120 20,680 1.9:0 1999.00 11,622 5,110 4,348 21,079 1.9% P2000-01 11,595 5,178 4,436 21,209 0.6% P2001-02 11,S62 5,421 4,465 21,448 1.1% P2002-03 11,53S S,621 4,480 21.636 0.991, • P2003-04 91699 5,572 6,437 21,708 OX, P2004-05 9,672 5,570 6,663 21,905 0.9% P2005-06 9,673 5,659 6,716 22,048 0.6% •New Confrguratior Elementary K-S hfiddle School 6-8 High School 942 j Enrollment History and Six Year forecast 23,000 3.0 io 22,000 E 2.5% M 21,000 t .rs 33 2.0'/e e 20,000 ys t u x. E IF T j 18.000 ° " 17,000 st _ S. 16.000 9 +, 3 School Year L_1FTE -o--Percent of Change 18 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 199910D CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAT CAPACITY SUMMARY-ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS Actual I -- Projected-- CAPACITY 1999 2000 2001 2002 2 2003 2003 200� BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY 11,131 11,131 11,105 11,079 11,053 11,027 111,001 c !n n 0 1. Special Education Changes (26) (26) (26) !_1 (26) (26) e n Adjusted Program Capacity 11,131 11,105 11,079 11,053 `= 11,027 11, 001 11,001 ENROLLMENT Basic FTE Enrollment 11,622 11,561,535 9,699 9,672 9,673 2. Internet Academy 138 111,5952 1 150 150 ( 150 130 130 I 130 Basic FTE Enrollment without Internet Academy 11,484 11.445 11,4I2 11,385 9,569 9.542 9,543 SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) PROGRAM CAPACITY (353) ( (340) (333)'. (332) 1,458 1,459 1,4S8 RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 3. Current Portable Capacity 1,325 1,325 1,400 1,400 1,350 1,350 1,350 Add/Subtract portable capacity 73 Move to High School (50) Adjusted Portable Capacity 1,325 1,400 1,400 1,350 1 1,350 1 1,350 1,350 SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 972 1 1,060 1_1,067 1 1,018 1 1 2,808 2,809 2,808 NOTES: 1. Add Programs 3 ECEAP, 1 SOD(Severely Behavioral Disordered)and 1 Pre-School Program. This reduces Basic Education capacity in the school years indicated. 2. Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities. 3. Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available. This is a calculated number only. The actual number of portables that will be used will be based upon actual population needs. 21 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARY-JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS Actual -- Projected-- CAPACITY 1999 2000 2001 2002 z 2003 2004 2005 BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY 4,721 4,721 4,721 4,721 p 4,721 I 4,721 4,721 z I c 1, Add New Middle School c 800 oa c n o' Adjusted Program Capacity 4,721 4,721 4,721 4,721 ' 4,721 4,721 5,521 ENROLLMENT Basic FTE Enrollment 5,110 5,178 5,421 5,621 5,572 5,570 5,659 2. Internet Academy 185 200 225 250 275 275 275 Basic FTE Enrollment without Internet Academy 4,925 4,978 5,196 5,371 5,297 5,295 5,384 SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) PROGRAM CAPACITY (204) (257) (475) (650) (576) (574) 137 �'�• RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 3. Current Portable Capacity 625 625 700 700 700 700 700 Add/Subtract portable capacity 4, Federal Way Public Academy 75 Adjusted Portable Capacity 625 700 700 700 700 700 700 SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 421 443 225 50 124 126 837 NOTES: 1. Add new middle school 2. Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities. 3. Relocatable Capacity is based on the nurrlber of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available. This is a calculated number only. The actual number of portables that will be used will be based upon actual population needs. 4 Federal Way Public Academy will increase capacity atone junior high site. 22 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999100 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARY-SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS ^� Actual -- Projected-- CAPACITY 1999 2000 2001 2002 z 2003 2004 2005 BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY 4,142 4,142 4,142 4,248 n 4,698 6,048 16,048 v G Add or subtract changes in capacity 0 1. Truman Remodel 106 _ 2. Add Capacity to Three High Schools 450 3. Add New High School 1,350 -- i Adjusted Program Capacity 4,142 4,142 4,248 4,698 6,048 6,048 6,04E ENROLLMENT Basic FTE Enrollment 4,348 4,436 4,465 4,480 6,437 6,663 6,716 4. Internet Academy 164 200 225 250 275 300 325 Basic Ed without Internet Academy 4,184 4,236 4,240 4,230 6,162 6,363 6,391 SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) PROGRAM CAPACITY (42) (94) 8 468 (114) (315) (343) RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 5. Current Portable Capacity 325 325 325 325 375 375 375 Add\Subtract portable capacity Add from Elementary 50 Adjusted Portable Capacity 325 325 325 375 375 375 375 SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 283 231 333 843 1726IT60 32 NOTES: 1. Truman High School modernization and expansion 2. Add capacity to three existing high schools 3. Add new high school 4. Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities. 5. Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities arc available. This is a calculated number only. The actual number of portables that will be used will be based upon actual population needs. 23 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Kips County,the City of Federal Way, and the City of Kent Impact Fee Calculations Single and Multi-Family Residences Each jurisdiction that imposes school impact fees requires that developers pay these fees to help cover a share of the impact of new housing developments on school facilities. To determine an equitable fee throughout unincorporated King County, a formula was established. This formula can be found in King County Code 21A and was also substanially adopted by the City of Federal Way and Kent. The formula requires the District to establish a "Student Generation Factor" which estimates how many students will be added to a school district by each new single or multi-family unit and to gather some standard construction costs,which are unique to that district. - STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR ANALYSIS Federal Way Public Schools student generation factor was determined separately for single family units and multi-family units. The factors used in the 1999/00 Capital Facilities Plan were derived using actual generation factors from single family units and multi-family units, which were constructed in the last five- (5) years. - IMPACT FEE CALCULATION Following the calculations for the student generation factor is a copy of the Impact Fee Calculation for single family and multi-family units based on King County Code 21A and the Growth Management Act. Single Family Units Multi-Family Units 24 r ,�.► N fqqo A � 0 9 Y n N m r DiLNNto im O � G ~ N V' m N C ~ y e� tvcCGC O O C G G C O O r o p M m CL C �. r N N f► t"fp = to Y u Ln co M 0 3 aL'1 LOn O r NN C r LL m O r N O O G -E � n � mQ � Qe9 � G N O CJ N <L r O r N '• N r r N C G C O G O C G O G uC Or� prpmi Q � y 0 .C.. ci N � _ n � c � m in t Y P7m o Q r d 7 LY7 ^ " M Ln m m � p N 0 0 0 0 Lp LL 0 0 S r P/ r O N r *0 O G G C O O L Ci C G O O O f S N Q N"P M 1ApB tN'pp7 C q C �. r /7 Q N 8j t7 Q1 Q n le V 1fOpf N O tD Y Z r LL'1 r x C pL N N O L Y r N 1� r 119 r N lV . a+ LnN E � L6 c r Q m n � e Ln1.. LpN o NN o0 D N LL r r Or W 0 0 0 Z W d0000c0000 0 o a ofA Li G = C y� e7 OL Cc, N N L") Lo M N c m r Of O r CO E C E r = Z o N U C C L N N N � •C O •R 0 LO .N. i N o N L Y C N Z C C �. u C Pf m C a N 9 L0 in r r L O O' Y 0 N 0 N Q r N W O m Ln r m Y O t= C9 a r, 10 N E9 3 U � � .- = -p . V z •� N c Z u L 'D _. Ln c Z Z :� N N L •C 0 e.Nr .� 0 C V m N \ re, toQorr co m 20 a E ECA 3raLn _ L LU U O� c LAN =_ z o •� D N N QL 'r 0 'E `a m = cV) Ln m a = o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o E ti (1 N N c v •r N o f cn " i n C ° fs a L6 = LV to N r• N IL'��r m N IO N 7 C1 7 01 2 C iff f ! N 7 L LLui L N R � dCb3• � g maEiLonp o Na CO � W Sow m N H y y y y SSE V V V V FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999100 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN IMPACT FEE School Site Acquisition Cost: Student Student Facility Cost/ Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Acreage Acre Capacity SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary 0.00 SO 484 0.2939 0.0656 SO SD Middle School u 20.00 550,000 8So 0.1530 0.0246 5191 531 Sr High 40.00 �S80,000 1,350 0.1549 0.0656 S367 S155 TOTAL S558 5186 School Construction Cost: Student Student %Perm Fac./ Facility Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Cosy Total Sq Ft Cost Capacity SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary 96.700/a SO 484 0.2939 0.0656 SO SO Middle School -96.70% S17,000,060 800 0.1530 0.0246 S3,144 S505 Sr Hieh ~ 96.70°/a S40,800,000 1,350 0.1548 0.0656 S4,524 S1,917 TOTAL S7,668 S2,423 Temporary Facility Cost: Student Student %Temp Fac. Facility Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Total Sq Ft Cost Size SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary -� 3.30% S60,374 23 0.2939 0.0656 $23 S5 trliddlc School _ 3.30% S60,314 Z5 0.t530 0.0246 S12 S2 Sr Hieh - 3.30% 560,374 25 0.1548 0.0656 S12 S5 TOTAL S48 S12 State Matching Credit Calculation: Student Student Boeck Cost/ Sq.Ft. State Factor Factor Cosy Cost/ Sq Ft Student Match SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary S101.39 0 0.00% 2N, .299 0.0656 SO SO Middle School _ SIn1.39 110 0.00% O.i530 0.0246 SO 50 New Sr High S101.39 1201 60.621/, 0.1548 0.0656 S1,142 S484 Total S1,142 S484 Tax Payment Credit Calculation SFR MFR Average Assessed Value (April2000) S163,436 S45,536 Capital Bond Interest Rate(April 2000) 5.94% _ 5.94% Net Present Value of Average Dwelling S1,206,330 $336,104 Years Amortized 10 10 Property Tax Levy Rate S 1.42 S 1.42 Present Value of Revenue Stream S1,713 S477 Single Family Multi-Family Residencts Residences Mitigation Fee Summary Site Acquisition Cost S 558 S 186 Permanent Facility Cost S 7,668 S 2,423 Temporary Facility Cost S 48 S 12 State Match Credit S (1,142) S (484) Tar Payment Credit $ (1,713) S (477) Sub-Total S 5,419 S 1,660 50°/a Local Sham S 2,710 S 830 Impact Fee S 2,710 S 830 26 (yL/L{`fLL� AA1 1 1 SECTION 4 SUMMARY OF CHANGES FROM 1998/99 PLAN FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999100 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 4 SUMMARY OF CHANGES FROM THE 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN The 1999100 Capital Facilities Plan is an updated document, based on the 1998199 Capital Facilities Plan. The changes between the 1998199 Plan and the 1999/00 Plan are listed below. SECTION I -THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN INVENTORY OF EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES Marketing Academy is removed from the inventory INVENTORY OF UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY Site 85 is added to inventory—purchased site for the new senior high school. NEEDS FORECAST- NEW FACILITIES New High School site has been purchased and is removed from the needs forecast. MOT Site is removed from the needs forecast. This project is not actively being planned at this time. The current MOT site is not for sale at this time. SIX YEAR FINANCE PLAN The Six Year Finance Plan has been rolled forward to reflect 2000/2005 27 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999100 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION III - SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION CAPACITY The average capacity of senior high schools is increased from 1232 to 1311. This change is a result of analysis of current building use and programs in place for the 1999/00 school vear. Building Program Capacities are found on page 13. PORTABLES The list of portables reflects the movement of portables between facilities or new portables purchased. Portable Locations can be found on page 15. STUDENT FORECAST The Student Forecast now covers 1999 through 2005. The new forecast reflects a decreased rate of growth.Enrollment History and Projections are found on page 18. CAPACITY SUMMARY The changes in the Capacity Summary are a reflection of the changes in the capacities and student forecast. New schools and increased capacity at current buildings are shown as increases to capacity. Capacity Summaries are found on pages 20-23. IMPACT FEE CALCULATION - KING COUNTY CODE 21A The Impact Fee Calculations have changed due to changes in several factors. The adjustment made in the Impact Fee Calculation,causing a change in the Impact Fee between the 1998/99 Capital Facilities Plan and the 1999/00 Capital Facilities Plan can be found on page 29. 28 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999100 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN IMPACT FEE CALCULATION CHANGES FROM 1998199 TO 1999100 STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS Student Generation factors are based on rates for new developments constructed over a period of not more than five years prior to the date of the fee calculation. The changes in student Generation factors between the 1999/00 Capital Facilities Plan and the 1998/99 Capital Facilities Plan are due to developments that were deleted or added based upon the age of the developments. Student allocation is also changed to reflect the middle school configuration. The Student General worksheet is found on page 25. IMPACT FEE Item From/To Comment Percent of Permanent Facilities 96.95 to Report#3 OSPI 96.70% Percent Temporary Facilities 3.05% to Updated portable inventory - 3.30% Temporary Facility Cost $62,368 to Updated cost of most recently $60t374 purchased portables Boeck Cost/Sq. Ft $99.68 to Change per OSPI $101.39 Sq.Ft. Student/Middle School 112 to Square Foot Allocation change from 110 . Junior High to Middle School State Match 59.89% to Change per OSPI 60.62% Average Assessed Value SFR - Per Puget Sound Educational Service $153.095 to District (ESD 121) $1639436 MFR - $35,488 To$45,536 Capital Bond Interest Rate 5.11% to Market Rate 5.94% r^. 29 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, amending the Kent Zoning Map to change the zoning designations as follows: (1) from Low Density Multifamily Residential District (MR-G) to Community Commercial District(CC) for property located at 12819 Kent-Kangley Road (CPZ-2000-2); and (2) from Commercial Manufacturing-1 District (CM-1) and Single- Family Residential District (SR-6) to Single-Family Residential District (SR-8) for property located at South 222"d Street and 88d'Avenue South(CPZ-2000-3). WHEREAS, pursuant to the Washington Growth Management Act ("GMA"), the City of Kent accepts applications for comprehensive plan amendments i" once each year; and WHEREAS, the City of Kent received applications to amend the Comprehensive Plan's land use plan map designations and three(3) of those applications involve properties requesting corresponding amendments to the zoning map designation of the following parcels: (1) 21800 Frager Road and 22002 Riverview Boulevard CPZ- 2000-1, (2) 12819 Kent-Kangley Road, CPZ-2000-2; and(3) South 222"d Street and 88d' Avenue South, CPZ-2000-3; which applications were received in Kent, Washington by the deadline of September 1, 2000; and WHEREAS, the Kent Land Use &Planning Board held a public hearing on the proposed comprehensive plan and zoning map amendments on November 27, 2000; and made the following recommendations: (1) the denial of CPZ-2000-1, and (2) the approval CPZ—2000-2 and CPA-2000-3, and 1 2000 Zoning Amendments WHEREAS, on February 5, 2001, the Planning Committee reviewed the proposed amendments and moved to recommend to the full City Council(1)tabling CPZ- 2000-1 until the Agricultural Lands Study is complete, and (2) approval of zoning map amendments CPZ-2000-2 and CPZ-2000-3; and WHEREAS, on February 20, 2001,the City Council for the City of Kent approved the recommendation to table the proposed comprehensive plan designation for CPZ-2000-1 until the Agricultural Lands Study is complete; WHEREAS, on February 20, 2001, the Kent City Council approved the comprehensive plan and zoning amendments as follows: 1. From Low Density Multifamily(LDMF) to Commercial (C) for property located at 12819 Kent-Kangley Road(CPA2000-2(B)), and the corresponding zoning map amendment from Low Density Multifamily Residential (MR-G) to Community Commercial (CC) (CPZ-2000-2); 2. From Industrial and Single-Family Residential(SF-6)to Low Density Multifamily (LDMF) for property located at South 222ad Street and 880'Avenue South(CPA- 2000-2(C)), and the corresponding zoning map amendment from Commercial Manufacturing-1 (CM-1)and Single-Family Residential (SR-6)to Single-Family Residential (SR-8) (CPZ-2000-3);NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City of Kent zoning map is hereby amended to establish a new zoning map designation for the property located at 12819 Kent-Kangley Road, Kent, Washington from a zoning designation of Low Density Multifamily Residential (MR-G) to Community Commercial (CC) and as depicted in the attached Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference (CPZ-2000-2). 2 2000 Zoning Amendments SECTION The City of Kent zoning map is hereby amended to establish a new zoning map designation for the properties located at South 222"1 Street and 881h Avenue South, Kent, Washington from a zoning designation of Commercial Manufacturing-1 (CM-1) and Single-Family Residential (SR-6) to Single-Family Residential (SR-8) and as depicted in the attached Exhibit B and incorporated herein by this reference (CPZ-2000-3). SECTION 3. - Severabilitv. If any one or more sections, subsections, or sentences of this Ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 4. -Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty(30) days from and after the date of passage and publication as provided by law. JIM WHITE, MAYOR ATTEST: BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: ROGER A. LUBOVICH, CITY ATTORNEY 3 2000 Zoning Amendments PASSED: day of , 2001. APPROVED: day of 12001. PUBLISHED: day of , 2001. I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No. ,passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the City of Kent as hereon indicated. BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK P'.\Civ(ROrdome ZonuMMapnzncnd-2000.dm 4 2000 Zoning Amendments z a E m ■ = _ Q W :: > e a op= N m Z Q = a s oe �' c b 0 � a V m = Al p _ ' = e = $ A p � z m' 3 3 N w` an d .CN _ .'. ;. /. a' i i / . EXHIBIT C la O d a M +' E 016. y J Ca CM m ti � mZO c v a Hm c mN I e C 3 m Y m LL o E to V m J Y V In NN m d � v w :E6 IL Ilk 13 71 SIS so ip lip WW �f �� ;� w •� 'dig`-' ' � -. �� CIF• 1 • 1/( %�.-�c� ��i•1 •ai , � �+ . . __ -- - - -- �s.ice �•.�' `/ �- .-ems`• /••�. �� t W. ,: i 600 w ' ir ILI arm kL \� , ' � . Y _ 1, ..... .......: ExxIsir ;V �- Kent City Council Meeting �,W- V Date March 6 , 2001 aj Category Consent Calendar 1 . SUBJECT: SCHOOL IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE — ORDINANCE 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Adoption of Ordinance No. -3 57 6 amending the School Impact Fee ordinance for the Federal Way School District based on the Capital Facilities Plan of the school district which is being adopted as an element of the City of Kent ' s Comprehensive Plan concurrently with this ordinance . The School Impact Fees for the Federal Way School District increased from $2 , 384 to $2, 710 for Single-Family Residences and $786 to $830 for Multifamily residences . There are no changes to the Kent School District school impact fees . 3 . EXHIBITS: Ordinance 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Council (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 6D ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, amending Section 12.13.160 of the Kent City Code to amend the school impact fee schedule. WHEREAS, the City of Kent adopted a school impact fee program as authorized by the Growth Management Act and RCW 82.02.050; and WHEREAS, Chapter 12.13.070 of the Kent City Code requires that the Capital Facilities Plans of the school districts be submitted to the City of Kent on an annual basis for City Council review, and that such review shall occur in conjunction with � any update of the Capital Facilities Plan element of the City's Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the Kent and Federal Way School Districts have requested amendments to the text of the Comprehensive Plan to reflect proposed changes to impact fees resulting from new student population generated by new single-family and multifamily residential development; and WHEREAS,after a public hearing on November 27,2000,before the Land Use and Planning Board, and further discussion by the Planning Committee on February 5, 2001, the City Council on February 20, 2001, approved the recommendation that the Comprehensive Plan be amended, CPA-2000-2(F), to include the Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent and Federal Way School Districts,which include a change in proposed impact fees in the Federal Way School District to $2,710 for single-family and $830 for l School Impact Fee-2000 multifamily units; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to amend section 12.13.160 of the Kent City Code to reflect the Comprehensive Plan amendment that established a new base fee schedule for the Federal Way School District of$2,710 for single-family and $830 for multifamily units; NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Section 12.13.160 of the Kent City Code is hereby amended as follows: Sec. 12.13.160. Base fee schedule. The following fee shall be assessed for the indicated types of development: School District Single Family Multi-family Multi-family studio Kent,No. 415 $3,782.00 $2,329.00 $ 0.00 Federal Way, No. 210 $2,384.AA $ 786..90 $ 0.00 2 710.00 830.00 SECTION 2. -Severabilitv. If any one or more sections, subsections, or sentences of this Ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 3. -Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty(30) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law. JIM WHITE, MAYOR 2 School Impact Fee-2000 -� r ATTEST: BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: ROGER A. LUBOVICH, CITY ATTORNEY PASSED: day of , 2001. APPROVED: day of , 2001. PUBLISHED: day of , 2001. I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No. ,passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the City of Kent as hereon indicated. (SEAL) BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK P-�CfviAOrdiname\SchooHmput•2000.dm 3 School Impact Fee-2000 I FIEV k'Ps �— Kent City Council Meeting Date March 6 , 2001 Category Consent Calendar 1 . SUBJECT: 277TH CORRIDOR AGREEMENT - AUTHORIZE 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works Committee, authorization for the Mayor to sign the 277th Corridor Inter-agency Agreement with Auburn, to carry out all acts consistent with this agreement, including applying for and accepting grant funds, and ratifying all acts taken consistent with this motion. Also, authorization to add a Public Works Department full time accounting position to be funded out of Auburn' s 277th Corridor project up to two years . It is our intent to start this position as part time but because of numerous funding agencies involved and the different criteria associated with each and coupled with the dollar magnitude, we need the flexibility to increase the position to full time if needed. 3 . EXHIBITS: 277th Inter-Agency agreement and Public Works Director memorandum 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc . ) 5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS : 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 6E PR 562-South 277th Street Reconstruction Project Exhibit A /A$562 -CONSTRUCTION BUDGET AND FUNDS m ted Project Costs Prior to 2000 2000 2001 2002 2003 Total Construc:ion - 9,841,296 9,500,000 4,000,000 23,341,296 Construction Engineering - 1,022,323 1,023,500 437,000 2,482,823 PSE Transmission Tower Relocation - 1,200,000 - - 1,200,000 Railroad Work - 100,000 50,000 50,000 200,000 4 Consfru dWTdtal fi$ = 1 ;,: f _ , J2:18 ! T-140,573;i500; '$, ,. m"448 OOII1 $ .27,224;119 Total Estimated Cost $ - 12,163,619 10,573,500 $ 4,487,000 :$ 27,224,119 Funding`Source "::' 'Obligated Prior to'2000`: 2000 2001 .• 2002 3003;- -'• oet Total Construction TIB(FY2001) Oct-00 4,330,474.70 3,659,203.92 1,092,313.38 9,082,OCO.00 FMSIB 6,165,454.75 5,359,970.02 2,274,575.23 13,800,000.00 Corridor Grant 867,684.55 754,326.06 320,108.39 1,942,119.00 BNSF RR 400,000.00 400,000.00 400,000.00 1,200,000.00 UP RR 400,000.00 400,000.00 400,000.00 1,200,000.00 SUBTOTAL 12,163,619.00 10,573,500.00 4,487,000.00 27,224,119.00 TOTAL FUNDING 12,163,619.00 10,573,500.00 4,487,000.00 127,224,119.00 Additional Funds Required Moving of Historical House 210,000 PSE Transmission Towers Relocation 1,278,000 Auburn Interceptor 1.075,407 Wetland Mitigation 876,052 Total Cost of Ootions 3,439,458 T�•tal_Eunds to be transferred to Kent runding Source„ z ntTota4;-' TIB(FY2001) Oct-00 9,082,000 FMSIB 13,800,000 BNSF RR* 1,200,000 UP RR* 1,200,000 ?Tdlalr $ 25,282,000.00 BNSF and UP Railroads payments of$400,000 per Railroad will be made to the City of Auburn in March 2001,March 2002 and March 2003. H:1PR5621BudgetkINTERLOCAL_CONSTRFUNDS 2120/01 Kent City Council Meeting Date March 6, 2001 Category Consent Calendar 1 . SUBJECT: 277TH CORRIDOR AGREEMENT - AVTHORIZE j� 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommend by the Public Works Committee, authorization for the M or to sign the 277th Corridor Inter-agency Agreement w' h Auburn and also, authorization to add a Public Wo s Department full time accounting position to be funde out of Auburn' s 277th Corridor project up to two years. It ib our intent to start this position as part time but beouse of numerous funding agencies involved and the different griteria associated with each and coupled with the dollar maoitude, we need the flexibility to increase the position to full time if needed. i i 3 . EXHIBITS: 277th In�er-Agency agreement and Public Works Director memorandum"" r i` i 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Nublic Works Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) {,ff 5 . UNBUDGETED F DCAL PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES 6 . EXPENDITURE' REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OFIFUNDS: 7 . CITY CO CIL ACTION: Counc ' lmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 6E COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Mike H. Martin,Deputy Chief Administrative Officer PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Don E. Wickstrom, P.E. Public Works Director 440 V t Phone:253-856-5500 KEN T Fax: 253-856-6500 WASHINGTON Address: 220 Fourth Avenue S. Kent,WA 98032-5895 Date: February 21, 2001 To: Public Works Co nrr 'ttee From: Don Wickstrom, Public Works Director Regarding: Inter-Agency Agreement— 277'' Corridor This item was discussed and approved by the Committee at their last meeting. Auburn's Council has now formally authorized their Mayor to sign same. While the �-, agreement has changed from the earlier version, we concur with it. What I forgot to bring out at the prior Committee meeting was the fact that to handle this project, accounting wise, an additional full time accounting position is required. It is proposed that said position would be funded out of the project costs and terminate at the completion of the project (2 years). It is our intent to start this position as part time but because of numerous funding agencies involved and the different criteria associated with each and coupled with the dollar magnitude, we need the flexibility to go to full time if need be. As such, we recommend the accounting position to be funded from the project for up to two years. MOTION: Recommend Council authorization to add a full time accounting position to be funded out of Auburn's 277'h Corridor project up to two years. MP2084 INTER-LOCAL AGREEMENT REGARDING 277TH CORRIDOR ROADWAY AND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION THIS INTER-LOCAL AGREEMENT is entered into between the CITY OF KENT, a Washington municipal corporation, located and doing business at 220 Fourth Avenue South, Kent, Washington 98032 ("Kent"), and the CITY OF AUBURN, a Washington municipal corporation, located and doing business at 25 West Main Street, Auburn, Washington 98001 ("Auburn"). RECITALS WHEREAS, Kent has completed construction of a roadway improvement project, commonly known as the S. 277th St. Corridor Project, which commences generally from the intersection of S. 277th Street and 83rd Avenue S. (a/k/a East Valley Road or Central Avenue or Auburn Way North) and runs generally east across the Green River, then along SE 274th Street in Kent, and then north along I I6th Avenue SE and terminating at Kent-Kangley Road in Kent; and WHEREAS,Auburn is in the process of completing the design for a five-lane arterial roadway and other related improvements ("Project")between Auburn Way North and 72nd Avenue South located in the north end of the Auburn city limits in King County; and WHEREAS, the five-lane roadway Project includes new grade separated bridge crossings over the Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) and Union Pacific (UP) railroad tracks; and WHEREAS, the existing roadway between Auburn Way North and 72nd Avenue South lies within the corporate limits of Auburn; and INTER-AGENCY AGREEMENT KENT/AUBURN REGARDING 277TH CORRIDOR 02/21/01 ROADWAY AND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION- Papc 1 of I I WHEREAS,Auburn has or is securing all permits necessary for the Project, except for those permits that are the responsibility of the Contractor as defined in the Project Construction Contract Documents,including,but not limited to, the Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 permit,Union Pacific Railroad permit,Burlington Northern Railroad permit,King County Grading permit, and Washington State Department of Fisheries permit; and WHEREAS, a remaining section of roadway between Auburn Way North and the Green River Bridge is uncompleted and remains as a 3-lane section instead of a 5-lane roadway section; and WHEREAS, Auburn is acting as lead agency for the Project under Washington State Environmental Policy Act Laws (SEPA) and will obtain and defend all SEPA approvals; and WHEREAS, Auburn has or is securing all necessary right-of-way for the Project including easements necessary for the relocation of a 72" Metro (King County) Sanitary Sewer, and easements across the Puget Sound Energy property,BNSF and UP properties; and WHEREAS, Auburn is coordinating with King County Department of Natural Resources for the construction of a King County Sanitary Sewer Interceptor on the north side of the road right-of-way; and WHEREAS, Auburn has or is coordinating with Puget Sound Energy to relocate certain power facilities along South 277th Street, to install a new gas main, and to raise the Electrical Transmission power lines along the Puget Sound Energy interurban right-of-way and along the BNSF right-of-way; and WHEREAS, Auburn has or is coordinating with King County for the design and construction of a new South 277' Street connection for 78th Avenue South to the"D" Street intersection; and INTER-AGENCY AGREEMENT RENT/AUBURN REGARDING 277TH CORRIDOR 02/11/01 ROADWAY AND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION. Page 2 of 1 I WHEREAS,the new five-lane arterial roadway portion of the Project,once completed, will remain within the Auburn corporate limits; and WHEREAS, the new five-lane arterial roadway portion of the Project will be designed and built to Washington State Department of Transportation(WSDOT) Standards as modified by Auburn Standards; and WHEREAS, the revised street connection of the Project known as 78th Avenue South will be designed and built to King County Standards; and WHEREAS,the revised street connection of the Project known as 72nd Avenue South north of S. 277' Street will be designed and built to Kent Standards; and WHEREAS,Auburn has appropriated or received the funds necessary to complete the Project as shown on Exhibit"A"; and WHEREAS, Kent has received funds ($1,942,119.00) under the 2000 County/City Corridor Congestion Relief Program for the Auburn Project; and WHEREAS, Kent is recognized as a Certified Agency (CA) by the WSDOT. WHEREAS,Auburn desires Kent to assist Auburn by assuming lead agency status for the construction of Auburn's Project; and WHEREAS, both Kent and Auburn desire as short of a construction period for the Project as is possible; and WHEREAS,both cities desire to work together for the mutual and overall benefit to INTER-AGENCY AGREEMENT KENT/AUBURN REGARDING 377fH CORRIDOR 03RIPo1 ROADWAY AND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION. Pagc J of 11 be derived from the Project; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms, conditions, covenants, and performances contained herein, or attached and incorporated and made part hereof, it is mutually agreed by the City of Kent and the City of Auburn as follows: AGREEMENT A. AUBURN'S ROLE IN THE COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT 1. The City of Auburn will complete all design work for the Project between Auburn Way North and 72nd Avenue South including preparation of plans, detailed specifications, coordination necessary with all affected agencies, permitting, responses to bidder inquiries during contract advertisement and preparation of any amendments to the solicitation, as required, which work is scheduled for completion by March 23, 2001. However, this obligation will continue through bid solicitation or until all necessary permits and right-of-way certification is obtained,whichever is latest. !-` 2. The City of Auburn will obtain all necessary property rights needed to construct the Project and will employ proceedings in condemnation as necessary. Auburn will use its best efforts to obtain rights of entry or other property rights necessary for the grant agencies, identified in Exhibit "A", to authorize Kent to advertise the Project on or about March 6, 2001. 3. The City of Auburn will continue with all real property transactions required to support that certification and the Project until these transactions are concluded. 4. The City of Auburn will make available to the City of Kent construction grant funds it has received for the Project as designated in Exhibit"A" subject to the provisions of Sections A.13 and A.14 herein. The City of Kent will administer these funds to support only the construction engineering management and construction of the Project. 5. Auburn will continue to provide a project engineer for the project that will INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT KENT/AUBURN REGARDING Z77TH CORRIDOR ON21/01 ROADWAY AND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION- Page 4 of I I attend all meetings, such as weekly construction progress meetings necessary during construction of the project. Scott Nutter will act in this capacity, and Auburn will use its best efforts to keep Mr. Nutter as the Auburn Project Engineer during the life of the project. 6. Auburn will review and approve construction "shop drawing" submittals as determined administratively by agreement between the Kent and Auburn project engineers required of the contractor for the construction of the Project,using its best efforts to complete this review within the time periods set by Kent. 7. Auburn will review and make decisions regarding all requests for changes during construction proposed by the contractor or Kent during construction of the Project, using its best efforts to complete this review within the time periods to be set by Kent. 8. Auburn will jointly sign grant applications as a participating agency if necessary for the completion of the funding of the Project for any new grant programs available. 9. Auburn will review the Project construction progress periodically and review correspondence submitted from Kent to insure compliance with Auburn's Construction Standards and to satisfy itself on the satisfactory progress of the construction. 10. Kent will,with Auburn's concurrence, determine the date of final acceptance of the Project. 11. Upon final acceptance of the Project by the Kent City Council, after first obtaining concurrent approval from the Auburn City Council,Auburn will assume ownership, maintain and operate the Auburn portion of the Project, including all of the right-of-way and associated utility infrastructure. Operation and maintenance will be by Auburn after the project is deemed "Substantially Complete" in accordance with the Project Construction Contract. INTER-AGENCY AGREEMENT KENT/AUBURN REGARDING 277TH CORRIDOR 0221/01 ROADWAY AND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION- Page 5 of I I 12. Auburn currently has obtained $ 25,282,000 of Project construction funding t` through grants and Kent has obtained $1,942,119 of Project construction funding through a grant, which Project, as currently configured and designed, is estimated to have a total construction cost of$27,200,000. Auburn will fully fund, with the utilization of the Kent grant, the Project through completion, including without limitation, cost adjustments attributable to change orders unless such change orders arise from or in connection with Kent's negligent performance of its Project responsibilities described in this Agreement. If, for any reason, sufficient funds cannot be obtained to cover the costs to fully fund the project, including future project amendments, Auburn will eliminate or cut back portions of the project to insure that it can fully fund final project costs. Both Kent and Auburn agree that Kent's financial contribution to the project will be limited to the $1,942,119 grant Kent obtained for the Project. 13. All costs of Auburn staff time not reimbursable by the grant agencies will be covered by City of Auburn funds. All costs of Auburn staff time reimbursable by Project grant funds will be submitted to the City of Kent for reimbursement in an amount not to exceed $180,000. 14. All costs associated with the relocating and raising of the PSE tower lines in the vicinity of the UPRR, reimbursable by Project grant funds,will be submitted to the City of Kent for reimbursement. The cost of this work is estimated to be $1,200,000. 15. Auburn will obtain the necessary permits,fund and build the remaining portion of the completed roadway, to provide a minimum of 4 travel lanes, between Auburn Way North and the Green River Bridge (east of Auburn Way North), including any redesign necessary and right-of-way acquisition. Auburn will use its best efforts to have this remaining section open for traffic within three years from the effective date of this agreement. 16. Auburn will reimburse Kent for all costs associated with the construction of Auburn's waterline improvements located within the Project limits that are not grant eligible and estimated to cost $ 128,400. B. KENT'S ROLE IN THE 277TH CORRIDOR PROJECT BETWEEN AUBURN INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT KENT/AUBURN REGARDING 277TH CORRIDOR 02/21/01 ROADWAY AND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION- Page 6 of 11 WAY NORTH AND 72ND AVENUE SOUTH. 1. Kent will assume a lead project management role after the plans and specifications are completed by Auburn and will advertise the project for construction bids, either as a single complete project or as several projects in various construction sequences or segments. Kent will not request of Auburn reimbursement for any grant eligible Project construction costs incurred before the execution of this agreement. 2. Kent shall not award any construction contract for the Project without Auburn's written consent. 3. Kent will, as part of Auburn's total project costs, manage the project through construction completion and acceptance. Kent shall not accept the Project as "Substantially Complete"without Auburn's written consent. Kent will manage the project by use of its staff resources and by use of consultants determined by Kent in consultation with Auburn staff to be appropriate for the project. Exclusive of the construction contract cost, and exclusive of any amendments under the terms of this agreement, Kent's charges associated with these services to manage the construction of the Project as described in this agreement shall not exceed$2,300,000 without written concurrence from Auburn. 4. Kent will review the plans and specifications prepared by Auburn and make recommendations for changes or modifications. 5. Kent and Auburn will cooperate to secure additional funds from any grant agencies for this project if necessary or if the opportunity arises. 6. Kent will consult with Auburn before acceptance of the Contractor's Progress Schedule and will keep Auburn advised of the construction progress and will use its best efforts to inform Auburn's project engineer of key meetings during project construction. Auburn's project manager will be invited to attend all weekly construction progress meetings. 7. Kent will utilize consultants or internal staff to provide the construction inspection and management necessary to oversee project construction. 8. Kent will provide one complete copy of inspection reports, daily reports,pay estimates and other normal construction reports generated during the project to Auburn and one additional complete copy, both to be maintained in the construction trailer. Kent will keep INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT KENT/AUBURN REGARDING 271TH CORRIDOR 02121/01 ROADWAY AND UTILITY CONSTRUCT ION. ''**s Page 7 of I I orderly records for turn over at the end of the Project. 9. Kent will advise Auburn on a monthly basis of all project expenditures and, on funds to be provided directly by the City of Auburn,will bill Auburn for these costs as work continues. 10. Kent will employ the Project's design consultant, Sverdrup, as necessary to respond to Requests For Information and review on Auburn's behalf(in coordination with Auburn's project engineer) shop drawing submittals and potential change orders. Kent will manage the Project construction contract(s), including construction change orders, in conformance with Kent's existing administrative policies and procedures, subject to the terms herein, and only insofar as Kent's actions to thus manage do not increase the total Project cost, to an amount which exceeds the total funding as identified in Exhibit "A", or as determined by the granting agencies identified in Exhibit"A"at construction contract(s)award,whichever is less, unless written authorization to exceed said amount is provided by Auburn. 11. Kent will enter into a separate agreement with King County to act as King County's agent to construct sewer lines in the Project right-of-way as permitted by Auburn and adjacent to the project as may be permitted by other agencies. 12. Kent will work with Auburn, both cities to work expeditiously and in good faith, to develop a set of administrative procedures necessary to achieve the smooth progress of the Project. 13. Kent will consult with Auburn before it releases the one-year Maintenance Bond. C. MISCELLANEOUS 1. Termination. This agreement shall terminate on the date that the parties have completed construction of the Project and the Auburn City Council has accepted the project as complete from Kent. 2. Governing Law. This agreement shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. If any dispute arises between the cities under any of the provisions of this agreement, resolution of that dispute shall be available exclusively through the jurisdiction,venue and rules of the King County Superior Court,King INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT KENTIAUBURN REGARDING 277TH CORRIDOR 0212 V01 ROADWAY AND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION. �� Page 8 of 11 - County, Washington. 3. Modification. No waiver, alteration, or modification of any of the provisions of this agreement shall be binding unless in writing and signed by a duly authorized representative of each city. 4. Severability. If any one or more sections, subsections or sentences of this agreement are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, that decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this agreement and the remainder shall remain in full force and effect. 5. Entire Agreement. Written provisions and terms of this agreement, together with any attached exhibits, supersede all prior verbal statements by any representative of either city, and those statements shall not be construed as forming a part of or altering in any manner this agreement. This agreement and any attached exhibits contain the entire agreement between the parties. Should any language in any exhibit to this agreement conflict with any language contained in this agreement, the terms of this agreement shall prevail. 6. Indemnification. Auburn will defend, indemnify and hold Kent, its officers, employees, agents, and assigns harmless from any and all claims,injuries, damages, losses or suits, including all legal costs and attorney fees, arising from or in connection with the design, permitting, award and construction of the project, but only to the extent of Auburn's negligence or comparative fault. Kent will defend, indemnify and hold Auburn, its officers, employees, agents, and assigns harmless from any and all claims,injuries,damages, losses or suits, including all legal costs and attorney fees, arising from or in connection with the design,permitting, award and construction of the project,but only to the extent of Kent's negligence or comparative fault. 7. Project Coordination and Dispute Resolution A. Aubum and Kent will designate project engineers who will conduct the routine project coordination. Every effort will be made to identify problems and resolve issues at the project engineer level to the satisfaction of both parties. Should a dispute arise between the participants regarding the technical aspects and/or a decision related to the construction management of the project, the Project Managers will attempt to narrow the issue in dispute INTER-AGENCY AGREEMENT KENT/AUBURN REGARDING 277TH CORRIDOR 022I/01 ROADWAY AND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION- Puce 9 of 1 I �' for consideration by the respective City Engineer of each city. The City Engineers will meet to determine if the dispute may be resolved by negotiation. If necessary, the City Engineers will select an additional representative from each City's staff to form a dispute resolution panel to resolve the dispute. Should the dispute resolution panel not be able to reach a mutually satisfactory resolution, the dispute will be resolved as described below. B. Legal disputes between the parties shall be resolved through the use of mediation by a mediator mutually acceptable to the participants with each participant equally agreeing to share the cost of the mediator. Should the parties not be able to resolve the dispute through mediation, the forum for resolution shall be King County Superior Court, Regional Justice Center, located in Kent, Washington. The substantially prevailing party will be entitled to attorney fees and costs. INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT KENT/AUBURN REGARDING 277T14 CORRIDOR 02/21/01 ROADWAY AND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION. /�� Peps 10 of 1 I THE CITY OF KENT: THE CITY OF AUBURN: JIM WHITE, MAYOR CHARLES BOOTH,MAYOR APPROVED BY KENT CITY COUNCIL MOTION ON , 2001. APPROVED BY AUBURN CITY COUNCIL MOTION ON , 2001. ATTEST: ATTEST: (SEAL) (SEAL) BRENDA JACOBER DANIELLE DASKUM KENT CITY CLERK AUBURN CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO FORM: TOM BRUBAKER MICHAEL J. REYNOLDS KENT DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY AUBURN CITY ATTORNEY ;eel INTER-AGENCY AGREEMENT KENT/AUBURN REGARDING 277TH CORRIDOR 0221101 ROADWAY AND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION- Page i I of 1 I Jt0 W h C L ■�� O 1 1 1 0 c li _ r z _ N vOi J � .AmH Aa110A •3 O¢ W Q cn Om CLf!) ALL 20 a O � n d z jaaa�3S ,6, F U UW e a•a JSNa s Z OW AN W Z p W W in LL cu cn E CD �- o C O }. CC) acn N O L ti .0 n.-0 2 cv > J r U 0 ¢ o o c"n � O J nW OC/5 a_ d Q NF C N ti cfj m 24 CN '2i'a'dfl O. rtega �eeenrstf. noaea¢gaegaee�eeage...igaoaaai �•"'^.e ••�1p•�ane7;la 7 �- poij uogjnjaaul 0 O U 0 -0 O G �p z as m � o a z S �ny •Pa a6o}uoj3 (colas) P ZL i_ i z O (L (L96 CIS) �Aemaaaj AalleA j # _ i— Z ZZj � O ('S •any 4199) ,(om46iH A8110A }saM rnr iar irnfivr anuav�u ncu +�+uirro�nvmn Kent City Council Meeting r" Date March 6 , 2001 Category Consent Calendar 1 . SUBJECT: SOUND TRANSIT IMPROVEMENTS CONDEMNATION - ORDINANCE 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works Committee, adoption of Ordinance No. providing for the condemnation of land for the street improvements associated with Sound Transit Commuter Rail Station project . 3 . EXHIBITS: Condemnation ordinance and Public Works Director memorandum 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS : 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: r- ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 6F COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Mike H. Martin, Deputy Chief Administrative Officer PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Don E. Wickstrom, P.E. Public Works Director one:253-856-5500 KE Ir 1 PhFax: 253-856-6500 WASHINGTON Address: 220 Fourth Avenue S. Kent,WA 98032-5895 Date: February 21,2000 To: Pub is Works Committee From: DonVVickstrom, Public Works Director Subject: Sound Transit Condemnation Ordinance The purpose of the attached Ordinance is to acquire property rights through condemnation, to reconstruct West Smith Street from Fourth Avenue North to Railroad Avenue and also, Pioneer Street from Railroad Avenue to Central Avenue for Sound Transit. The City is pursuing same versus Sound Transit as to follow their process would result in a year or more delay per implementing the needed street improvements. Further, due to the time constraint of getting these improvements built in time for the opening of the parking garage in the spring of 2002, we are asking that condemnation be authorized. This doesn't mean that we won't pursue negotiation settlements, only that we will pursue condemnation and negotiations simultaneously. MOTION: Recommend Council authorization to adopt the respective Condemnation Ordinance for the street improvements associated with Sound Transit Commuter Rail Station project. 0201 Imp ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, providing for the acquisition of certain property and/or property rights in order to construct, extend, widen,improve, alter,maintain, and reconstruct West Smith Street from its intersection at approximately Fourth Avenue North to approximately Railroad Avenue North, including intersection work; and to construct, extend,widen, improve, alter, maintain, and reconstruct Pioneer Street from its intersection at approximately Railroad Avenue North to Central Avenue North, including intersection work; providing for the condemnation, appropriation, taking and damaging of such property rights as are necessary for that purpose; providing for the payment thereof out of the "Sound Transit Street Improvement" fund(Fund R41-E23- 5510-4140); and directing the City Attorney to prosecute the appropriate legal proceedings,together with the authority to enter into settlements, stipulations or other agreements; all of said properties located within King County, Washington. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT,WASHINGTON,DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. After receiving the report of City staff, and after reviewing the planned improvements for the West Smith Street and Pioneer Street Projects (the "Projects"), the City Council finds and declares that the public convenience, use, health, safety,and necessity demand that the City of Kent condemn, appropriate, take, and damage all or portions of certain real properties located in King County, Washington, in order to acquire the necessary property and/or property rights for the construction of the Projects, 1 Sound Transit Condemnation including all necessary appurtenances. These properties are legally described in Exhibit A, attached and incorporated by this reference(the "Properties"). The purposes for which this condemnation is authorized shall include, without limitation, all acts necessary to complete he construction, extension, improvement, widening, alteration, maintenance and reconstruction of the Project, including improvements for drainage, curbs and gutters, sidewalks, bicycle paths, landscaping, illumination, signal improvements, electrical facilities, utilities, utility adjustments, relocations, and any other street or municipal purposes that may become necessary from time to time on the Properties. SECTION 2. The City authorizes the acquisition by condemnation of all or a portion of the Properties for the construction, extension, improvement, widening, alteration, maintenance, and reconstruction of the Projects, including acquisition of property and/or property rights, together with all necessary appurtenances and related work to make a complete improvement according to City standards. SECTION 3. The City shall condemn the Properties only after just compensation has first been made or paid into court for the owner or owners in the manner prescribed by law. SECTION 4. The City shall pay for the entire cost of the acquisition by condemnation provided for in this ordinance through the City's "Sound Transit Street Improvement" fund (Fund R41-E23-5510-4140) or from any of the City's general funds, if necessary, as may be provided by law. SECTION S. The City authorizes and directs the City Attorney to commence those proceedings provided by law that are necessary to condemn the Properties. In commencing this condemnation procedure,the City Council authorizes the City Attorney to enter into settlements, stipulations, or agreements in order to minimize damages,which settlements, stipulations, or agreements may include,but not be limited to, the amount of �` 2 Sound Transit Condemnation ust compensation to be paid, the size and dimensions of the property condemned, and the acquisition of temporary construction easements and other property interests. SECTION 6. Any acts consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date of this ordinance are ratified and confirmed. SECTION Z The provisions of this ordinance are declared to be separate and severable. The invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section or portion of this ordinance, or the invalidity of the application thereof to any person or circumstances shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this ordinance, or the validity of its application to other persons or circumstances. SECTION 8. This ordinance, being the exercise of a power specifically delegated to the City's legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect and be in force five(5) days after publication as approved by law. JIM WHITE, MAYOR ATTEST: BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: ROGER A. LUBOVICH, CITY ATTORNEY 3 Sound Transit Condemnation: PASSED the day of ) 2001. APPROVED the_ day of , 2001. PUBLISHED the_day of , 2001. I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of Ordinance No. , passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the City of Kent as hereon indicated. BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK P;NCivi110rdit ceZoondT a itCor4e doc /�' 4 Sound Transit Condemnation 1 BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF BLACK 4, YESLER'S FIRST ADDITION TO THE TOWN OF KENT, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 5 OF PLATS, PAGE 641 IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE WEST ALONG THE NORM LINE OF if SAID BLOCK 4, A DISTANCE OF 255 FEET TO THE HORTH6IEST CORNER OF SAID y BLOCK 4; THENCE SOUTH 1.58' NEST ALOIIG TIIE'HEST LINE OF SAID BLOCK 4, A' I DISTANCE OF 391.42 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89*27' EAST 112.01 FEET; THENCE 11ORTH 89*22' EAST 3.04 FEET; THENCE NORTH 1*58' EAST 107.11 FEET; THENCE i EAST 141.96 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE; EAST LINE OF SAID BLOCK 4; THENCE NORTH 1*58' EAST ALONG THE EAST LINE', OF SAID BLOCK 4 , A DISTANCE OF i 285.29 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THE SOUTH 7.5 I ' FEET OF THE NEST 115.05 FEET THEREOF. +. EXHIBIT A PAGE 1 of 6 PAIM A: Lets 7, 8 and 9 in Block 1 of Namsay's Addition to the Tern of Kent,' as per plat recorded in Volume 16 of Plats on page 89, records of King County, Washington; . EXCE°T thva West 86.09 feet thereof; FAFM B• The—West4 �60.39 fe`t of Lots 4, 5 and 6 in Block 2 of MTsay's Addition to the Twn of'1 FeAt, as per plat recorded in Volum 16 of Plats, on page 89, records of King county, .,, Washington, lying Southerly of the spur track of the Chicago-Milwaukee-St. Paul and Pacific Pailway; _ PAFCEL C: `t AM of the Vacated area of 3rd Avenue, between Blocks 1 and 2, in the plat of FWMILY'V I Addition to the Town of Kent, as per plar. recorded in Valusm 16 of Plata, en page 89, records of King County, Washington, lying Southerly of the spur tvmck of the Chicago- Milwaukee-St. Paul and Pacific Pailway; ALL situate in the County of King, State of Washington. EXHIBIT A -PAGE 2 of-6 z 1 ' 1 1 That portion of the Railroad Right Of-Way situated in the Northeast Quarter of Section 24,Township 22 North , Range-4 East; W.M.j lying southerly of-the south mar-gin of. Smith Street and northerly of the north margin of Meeker Street. . EXHIBIT A PAGE 3 of.:6 :1 That portion of the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 24, Township 22 North, Range 4 East, in King County, I Washington, lying west of First Avenue North, east of 41h Avenue. North, north of Temperance Street and south of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the west line of First Avenue North 762.45 feet south of the north line of said subdivision; Thence southwesterly and westerly on a curve to the right, radius of 265.44 feet, which is not tangent to said west line, a distance of 203.73 feet to a tangency in a line hereinafter called line "A" ; Thence south 89-58-30 west 226.9 feet; Thence on a curve to the right, radius of 742.0 feet, a distance of 221.77 feet; Thence north 72-53-30 west a distance of 108.4 feet to a point of curve; Thence on a curve to the left, radius 787.0 feet, a distance of 169.14 feet, more or less, to a point on the east line of 4`h Avenue North. �. EXCEPT that portion described as follows: That portion of the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 24, Township 22 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at the most southwesterly corner of the parcel land conveyed by Northwestern Improvement Company to The Borden.Company under deed dated April 12, 195.6 and recorded under Recording Number 4688725, records of King County, Washington, being a point in the east line of 41h Avenue in the City of" Kent; Thence south 0013'11" west along said east line 18.2 feet; Thence south 72053130" east 270.58 feet to a point of curve; Thence easterly on a curve to the left with a radius of 776.62 feet, a distance of.108.07 feet; Thence north 9*08107" east 22.3 feet to a point of curve from a tangent bearing south 80*51153" east; Thence easterly on a curve to the left, with a radius of 754.32 feet, a distance of 120.6 feet; Thence north 01001130" west 12.7 feet, more or less, to the southerly line of the above-mentioned parcel of land; Thence westerly along said southerly line to the point of beginning. EXHIBIT A PAGE 4 of 6 Lots 5 and 6 and that portion of Lots 4, 7 and 8, all in Block .2, lying south and west of the spur track of the Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railway Ramsay's Addition to the Town of Kent, according to the plat thereof recorded in volume 16 of Plats, page 89, in King County, Washington; EXCEPT the west 60.34 feet of Lots 4,- 5 and 6; TOGETHER WITH all vacated alley, as vacated by Ordinance No. 1265 of the city of Kent, lying southerly of said spur tracks : EXHIBIT A PAGE 5 of 6 PARCEL A: LOTS 21, 22 , AND THE SOUTH 24 FEET OF LOT 23 , BLOCK 2 , CROSS' ADDITION TO THE CITY OF KENT, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 18 OF PLATS, PAGE 9, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. PARCEL B: LOT 17, BLOCK 17 , WASHINGTON CENTRAL IMPROVEMENT COMPANY' S FIRST ADDITION TO KENT, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 3 OF PLATS, PAGE 97, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; AND ALSO THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED TRACT ADJOINING SAID LOT 17 ON THE NORTH DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: A STRIP OF LAND LYING NORTH OF LOT 17, BLOCK 17, WHICH STRIP EXTENDS NORTH TO THE SOUTH LINE OF PIONEER STREET AND EAST AND WEST FROM RAILROAD AVENUE NORTH TO THE ALLEY IN SAID BLOCK 17 . PARCEL C: LOT 18, BLOCK 17, WASHINGTON CENTRAL IMPROVEMENT COMPANY' S FIRST ADDITION TO KENT, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 3 OF PLATS, PAGE 97, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; AND ALSO THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED TRACT ADJOINING SAID LOT 18 ON THE NORTH DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT 23 FEET NORTH OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 18, . SAID BLOCK 17; THENCE SOUTH A DISTANCE OF 23 FEET; THENCE WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID BLOCK 17, A DISTANCE OF 120 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 18, SAID BLOCK 17; THENCE NORTH A DISTANCE OF 26 FEET; THENCE EAST IN A STRAIGHT LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. r^, EXHIBIT A PAGE 6 of 6 3 � JA 2 am LE � P�rli FI� (2 III i 'N a^V 414 � i� Kent City Council Meeting r Date March 6, 2001 Category Consent Calendar 1 . SUBJECT: WASHINGTON AVENUE/MEEKER ST. STREET IMPROVEMENTS CONDEMNATION - ORDINANCE 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works Committee, adoption of Ordinance No. providing for the condemnation of land for the Washington Avenue HOV Improvements and Meeker Street Widening project . 3 . EXHIBITS: Condemnation ordinance and Public Works Director memorandum 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 6G COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Mike H. Martin,Deputy Chief Administrative Officer PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Don E. Wickstrom, P.E. Public Works Director Phone:253-856-5500 K E N T Fax: 253-856-6500 WASMIMGTOM Address: 220 Fourth Avenue S. Kent,WA 98032-5895 Date: February 21,2000 To: Public A orks Committee From: Don trom, Public Works Director Subject: Washington Avenue HOV Improvements and Meeker Street Widening Condemnation As you are aware, we are pursing the implementation of the above referenced project. To get same under construction this year, certain right-of-ways need to be acquired. Due to the short timeframe available to make this construction season, we are seeking Council authorization to condemn. It's fully our intention to negotiate settlement but we need to pursue the condemnation course simultaneously in order to assure that we can make the construction season window. The Public Works Department requests that Committee recommend Council authorization to adopt the attached Condemnation Ordinance. MOTION: Recommend Council authorization to adopt the respective Condemnation Ordinance for the Washington Avenue HOV Improvements and Meeker Street Widening project. 010ImP ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, providing for the acquisition of certain property and/or property rights in order to construct, extend, widen, improve,alter,maintain, and reconstruct Washington Avenue from its intersection at approximately South 251st Street to approximately West James Street, including intersection work; and to construct, extend,widen,improve, alter,maintain, and reconstruct West Meeker Street from its intersection at approximately Washington Avenue to 300 feet west of 64th Avenue South, including intersection work;providing for the condemnation, appropriation,taking and damaging of such property rights as are necessary for that purpose; providing for the payment thereof out of the "Washington Avenue Street Improvements" Fund (Fund R69); and directing the City Attorney to prosecute the appropriate legal proceedings,together with the authority to enter into settlements, stipulations or other agreements; all of said properties located within King County,Washington. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON,DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. After receiving the report of City staff, and after reviewing the planned improvements for the Washington Avenue and West Meeker Street Projects (the "Projects"), the City Council finds and declares that the public convenience, use, health, safety, and necessity demand that the City of Kent condemn, appropriate, take, and damage all or portions of certain real properties located in King County, Washington, in order to acquire the necessary property and/or property rights for the construction of the "1 1 Washington Avenue/MeekerStreet Street Improvements Condemnation Projects, including all necessary appurtenances. These properties are legally described in Exhibit A, attached and incorporated by this reference (the "Properties"). The purposes for which this condemnation is authorized shall include,without limitation, all acts necessary to complete the construction, extension, improvement, widening, alteration, maintenance and reconstruction of the Project, including improvements for drainage, curbs and gutters, sidewalks, bicycle paths, landscaping, illumination, signal improvements, electrical facilities, utilities, utility adjustments, relocations, and any other street or municipal purposes that may become necessary from time to time on the Properties. SECTION 2. The City authorizes the acquisition by condemnation of all or a portion of the Properties for the construction, extension, improvement, widening, alteration, maintenance, and reconstruction of the Projects, including acquisition o property and/or property rights, together with all necessary appurtenances and related work to make a complete improvement according to City standards. SECTION 3. The City shall condemn the Properties only after just compensation has first been made or paid into court for the owner or owners in the mane prescribed by law. SECTION 4. The City shall pay for the entire cost of the acquisition b condemnation provided for in this ordinance through the City's "Washington Avenue Street Improvements" Fund (Fund R69) or from any of the City's general funds, if necessary, as may be provided by law. SECTION 5. The City authorizes and directs the City Attorney to commence those proceedings provided by law that are necessary to condemn the Properties. In commencing this condemnation procedure,the City Council authorizes the City Attorney to enter into settlements, stipulations, or agreements in order to minimize damages,which settlements, stipulations, or agreements may include,but not be limited to, the amount o 2 Washington Avenue/Meeker Street Street Improvements Condemnation just compensation to be paid, the size and dimensions of the property condemned, and the acquisition of temporary construction easements and other property interests. SECTION 6. Any acts consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date of this ordinance are ratified and confirmed. SECTION 7. The provisions of this ordinance are declared to be separate and severable. The invalidity of any clause,.sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section or portion of this ordinance, or the invalidity of the application thereof to any person or circumstances shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this ordinance, or the validity of its application to other persons or circumstances. SECTION 8. This ordinance, being the exercise of a power specificall delegated to the City's legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect and be in force five (5) days after publication as approved by law. JIM WHITE, MAYOR ATTEST: BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: ROGER A. LUBOVICH, CITY ATTORNEY 3 Washington Avenu"eeker Street Street Improvements Condemnation PASSED the day of 22001. APPROVED the_day of 22001. PUBLISHED the_day of , 2001. I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of Ordinance No. , passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the City of Kent as hereon indicated. BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK P:\CivihOrdinan Condom Wuhing\on-Meeka.doc �1. 4 Washington Avenue/Meeker Street Street Improvements Condemnation A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT Order No. 411535-1 SCHEDULE A Page 2 The land referred to in this commitment is situated in the county of King, State of Washington, and described as follows: The north .160.70 feet of the south 225.85 feet of Tract 25, of Supplemental Plat of Meeker's First Addition to the Town of Kent, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 5 of Plats', page 96, in King County, Washington; EXCEPT the west 222.80 feet of the north 50.50 feet thereof. END OF SCHEDULE A NOTE FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY: The following may be used as an abbreviated legal description on the documents to be recorded, per amended RCW 65.04 . Said abbreviated legal description is not a substitute for a complete legal description within the body of the document. Ptn of Lot 25, Supplemental Plat of Meeker's First Add. to the Town of Kent, V5/P96 ^R EXHIBIT A PAGE I of 29 Order No. 411539 -S A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A f Page .2 The land referred to in this commitment is situated in the county of King, State of Washington, and described as follows: That portion of Tract 27, Meeker's Supplemental plat of First Addition to Kent, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 5 of Plats, page 96, in King County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at the point of the intersection of the easterly line of said Tract 27 (which line is coincidental with the westerly margin of State Highway -No. 5-M, also known as Washington Street) and the northerly line of Shinn Street, as, delineated on said plat, extended westerly; Thence westerly along said northerly line of said Shinn Street, extended westerly fora distance of 240 feet; Thence northerly parallel to the easterly line of said Tract 27 to the northerly line of said Tract 27; Thence easterly 240 feet, more or less, along the northerly line of said Tract 27 to the northeasterly corner of said Tract 27; Thence along the easterly line of said Tract 27 to the point of beginning. END OF SCHEDULE A y NOTE FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY: The following may be used as an abbreviated legal description on the documents to be"recorded, per amended RCW 65.04 . Said abbreviated legal description is not a substitute for a complete legal description within the body of the document. ?tn. Tract 27, Meeker's Supp. Plat of First Add. to Kent, Vol. 5, pg. 96 EXHIBIT A PAGE 2 of 29 Order No. 411540 A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A Page 2 The land referred to in this commitment is situated in the county of King, State of Washington, and described as follows: That portion of Blocks 27 through 29,. inclusive, Supplemental Plat of Meeker's First Addition to the town of Kent, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 5 of Plats, page 96, in King County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at the southeast corner of said Block 28; thence south 89*39143" west along the north margin of the Kent-Des Moines Road 149.97 feet to the west line of the land conveyed to John A. Williams and Astrid Williams, husband and wife, by deed recorded under Recording No. 5183116, being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; continuing thence south 89*39143" west along said north margin 669.20 feet to the easterly line of that parcel of land conveyed by Pacific National Bank of Washington, a national banking association, in deed recorded under Recording No. 7511260407; thence north 0020117" west 540. 63 feet along said easterly line to an intersection with the southerly margin of Smith Street conveyed to the City of Kent by deed recorded under Recording No. 6452310; thence north 89039143" east along said southerly margin 829.32 feet, more or less, to the west margin of 70th Avenue South; thence south 0042'13" west along said west margin 390.73 feet, to ' "1 the north line of said Williams Land; thence south 89°39'43" west along said north line, 149. 97 feet to the west line of said Williams Land; thence south 0°42'13" west along said west line 149. 97 feet to the TRUE' POINT OF BEGINNING. END OF SCHEDULE A NOTE FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY: The following may be used as an abbreviated legal description on the documents to be recorded, per amended RCW 65.04 . Said abbreviated legal description is not a substitute for a complete legal description within the body of the document. Ptn. Blocks 27-29, Meeker's First Add. , V5/PG96 EXHIBIT A ^1 PAGE 3 of 29 Order No. 411541 — A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A Page 2 : The land referred to in this commitment is situated in the county of King, State of Washington, and described as follows: That portion of Block- 28, Supplemental Plat of Meeker's First Addition to the Town of Kent, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 8 of Plats, page 96, in King County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at the southeast corner of said Block 28; thence northerly along the east line of said Block 26, a distance of 150 feet; thence westerly parallel with the north margin of West Meeker Street (Kent-Des Moines Road) , a distance of 150 feet; thence southerly parallel with said east line of Block 28, a distance of 150 feet to the north margin of West Meeker Street; thence easterly 150 feet along the north margin of West Meeker Street to the southeast corner of Block 28, and the point of beginning; EXCEPT that portion deeded to the City of Kent for street purposes under Recording Number 72510130028; and EXCEPT that portion thereof condemned for roadway and utility purposes in King County Superior Court Cause Number 89-2-00067-9, as provided for under City of Kent Ordinance Number 2015. END OF SCHEDULE A NOTE FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY: The following may be used as an abbreviated legal description on the documents to be recorded, per amended RCW 65.04. Said abbreviated legal description is not a substitute for a complete legal description within the body of the document. Ptn. Block 28, Supplemental Plat of Meeker's First Addition to the Town of Kent, Vol. 8, pg. 96 EXHIBIT A PAGE 4 of 29 Order No. 411544 -/0 A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A Page 2 The land referred to in this commitment is situated in the county of King, State of Washington, and described as follows: That portion of Lot 3, City of Kent Short Plat Number SPC-74-11 as recorded under King County Recording Number 7501100471, in King County, Washington described as follows: Beginning at the southwest corner of said Lot 3 thence north 89°37 ' 13" east along the south line thereof 164 .07 feet; thence north 0022' 47" west 124.00 feet; thence south 89*37113" west 160.43 feet to the west line of said Lot 3; thence south 1018 '11" west along said west line 124 .05 feet to the point of beginning. (Being a portion of Block 29, supplemental plat of Meeker's First Addition to the Town of Kent, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 5 of Plats, page 96, in King County, Washington) ; EXCEPT that portion thereof deeded to the City of Kent by deeds recorded under King County Recording Numbers 9004252295 and 9004252296; (ALSO KNOWN AS a portion of Lot 3, Lot Line Adjustment Number LL-86-8 as recorded under King County Recording Number 8607100973) . END OF SCHEDULE A NOTE FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY: The following may be used as an abbreviated legal description on the documents to be recorded, per amended RCW 65.04. Said abbreviated legal description.is not a substitute for a complete legal description within the body of the document. Ptn. Block 29, Meeker's 1st Add. to Town of Kent, Vol. 5, pg. 96 EXHIBIT A PAGE 5 of 29 Order No. 411545 - rl A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A Page 2 The land referred to in this commitment is situated in the county of King, State of Washington, and described as follows: Lot 2, as delineated on City of Kent Short Plat No. SPC-91-18 recorded under Recording Number 9212010934, records of King County, Washington; said short plat being a portion of the west half of the northeast quarter, and of Government Lots 16 and 17 in Section 23, Township 22 North, Range 4 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington; . EXCEPT that portion conveyed to the City of Kent for right of way by deeds recorded under Recording Numbers 9210050780 and 9210056784 . END OF SCHEDULE A NOTE FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY: The following may be used as an abbreviated legal description on the documents to be recorded, per amended RCW 65.04. Said abbreviated legal description is not a substitute for a complete legal description within the body of the document. NE 1/4 6 Gov. Lots 16-17, 23-22-04 EXHIBIT A PAGE 6 of 29 Order No. 411547 -/3 A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A Page 2 The land referred to in this commitment is situated in the county of King, State of Washington, and described as follows: The south 110 feet of the west 100 feet of the east 280 feet of the following described tract: Beginning at the intersection of the west line of the G. Thompson Donation Claim and the north margin of Meeker Street (SSH 5-A) , in King County, Washington; thence south 89'0'0" west, along said north margin, a distance of 369.06 feet; thence north 0'36'14" east, 195. 95 feet; ti:=_nce north 89'59'54" east, 389.83 feet; thence south 0'36' 14" west 169. 16 feet to the point of beginning. END OF SCHEDULE A NOTE FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY: The following may be used as an abbreviated legal description on the documents to be recorded, per amended RCW 65.04 . Said abbreviated legal description is not a substitute for a complete legal description within the body of the document. NE 23-22-04 EXHIBIT A PAGE 7 of 29 Order No. 411548 --`1j A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A Page 2 - The land referred to in this commitment is situated in the county of King, State of Washington, and described as follows: That portion of Lots 30 and 31, Supplemental Plat of Meeker's First Addition to the Town of Kent, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 5 of Plats, page 96, in King County, Washington, described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of said Lot 30; thence east along the north line thereof 30 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing east along the north line of Lots 30 and 31, a distance of 200 feet; thence south parallel to the east line of Lot 31, a distance of 250 feet; thence west parallel to the south line of said lots, 200 feet, more or less, to a point 30 feet east of the west line of Lot 30; thence north 250 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT the following described property: That portion of Lot 30, Supplemental Plat of Meeker's First �— Addition to the Town of Kent, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 5 of Plats, page 96, in King County, Washington, described as follows : Beginning at the northwest corner of said Lot 30; thence east along the north line thereof a distance of 30 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence south parallel with the west line of said Lot 30, a distance of 15 feet; thence in a northeasterly direction a distance of 22 feet more or less to a point on the north line of said lot which point lies 15 .00 feet east of the true point of beginning; thence west along said north line a distance of 15 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. END OF SCHEDULE A NOTE FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY: The following may be used as an abbreviated legal description on the documents to be recorded, per amended RCW 65.04. Said abbreviated legal description is not a substitute for a complete legal description within the body of the document. Lots 30-31, Supplemental Plat of Meeker's First Addition to the Town of Kent, Vol . 5, pg. 96 EXHIBIT A PAGE 8 of 29 Order No. 911549—�1�'` A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT T SCHEDULE A Page 2 The land referred to in this commitment is situated in the county of King, State of Washington, and described as follows: Parcel C, City of Kent Lot Line Adjustment Number LL96-31, recorded under Recording Number 9612161402; being a portion of Tracts 35 and 43, all in Supplemental Plat of Meeker's First Addition to the Town of Kent, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 5 of Plats, page 96, in King County, Washington. END OF SCHEDULE A NOTE FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY: The following may be used as an abbreviated legal description on the documents to be recorded, per amended RCW 65.04 . Said abbreviated legal description is not a substitute for a complete legal description within the body of the document. Ptn. Tracts 35 and 43, Supp. Plat of Meeker's First Add. to Town of Kent, Vol. 5, pg. 96 ' EXHIBIT A PAGE 9 of 29 Order No. 413972 _f5A- A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT � . SCHEDULE A Page 2 The land referred to in this commitment is situated in the county of King, State of Washington, and described as follows: That portion of Lot 35, Supplemental Plat of Meeker's First Addition to the Town of Kent, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 5 of Plats, page 96, in King County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at the northeast. corner of a tract of land described in Exhibit "A" in instrument under King County Recording Number 9609091262, said point being a point on the north line of said Lot 35; Thence along the easterly line of said tract the following two courses: South 00*38123" west 80.05 feet; Thence south 04*47131" west 175.90 feet to a point on the south line of said Lot 35; Thence north 89038102" east along said south line 95.30 feet to the southeast corner of said Lot 35; Thence north 00037137" east along the east line thereof, 255.34 feet to the northeast corner of said Lot 35; Thence south 89034140" west along the north line thereof, .82.51 feet to the point of beginning; (ALSO KNOWN AS Revised Parcel A of City of Kent Lot Line Adjustment Number LL96-31, recorded under Recording Number 9612161402) . END OF SCHEDULE A NOTE FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY: The following may be used as an abbreviated legal description on the documents to be recorded, per amended RCW 65.04. Said abbreviated legal description is not a substitute for a complete legal description within the body of the document. Ptn Lot 35, Supp. Plat of Meekers 1st Add. to Town of Kent, Vol. 5, pg. 96 EXHIBIT A PAGE 10 of 29 Order No. 411551 -f� A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A Page 2 The land referred to in this commitment is situated in the county of King, State of Washington, and described as follows: The west 60 feet of Tract 36, Supplemental Plat of Meeker's First Addition to the Town of Kent, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 5 of Plats, page 96, in King County, Washington. END OF SCHEDULE A NOTE FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY: The following may be used as an abbreviated legal description on the documents to be recorded, per amended RCW 65.04 . Said abbreviated legal description is not a substitute for a complete legal description within the body of the document. Ptn. Tract 36, Supplemental Plat of Meeker's First Add. to Town of Kent, Vol. 5, Pg. 96 EXHIBIT A PAGE 11 of 29 • .r Order No. 411554 A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A Page 2 The land referred to.in this commitment is situated in the county of King, State of Washington, and described as follows: PARCEL A: The east half of Lot 37, Supplemental Plat of Meeker's First Addition to Town of Kent, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 5 of Plats, pages 96, in King County, Washington; EXCEPT the west 10 feet thereof; AND EXCEPT the north 10 feet thereof conveyed to the State of Washington for road purposes by deed recorded under Recording Number 6041079. PARCEL B: Lot 38, Supplemental Plat of Meeker's First Addition to Town of Kent, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 5 of Plats, pages 96, in King County, Washington; EXCEPT the west 10 feet thereof; AND EXCEPT the north 10 feet thereof conveyed to the State of Washington for Secondary State Highway No. 2-M, by deeds recorded under Recording Number 6041079; �- AND EXCEPT the east 15 feet thereof. END OF SCHEDULE A NOTE FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY: The following may be used as an abbreviated legal description on the documents to be recorded, per amended RCW 65.04 . Said abbreviated legal description is not a substitute for a complete legal description within the body of the document. Ptn. Lots 37-38, , Supp. Plat of Meeker's First Add. to Town of Kent, Vol. 5, pg. 96 EXHIBIT A PAGE 12 of 29 Order No. 411555 40700"� A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A Page.2 The land referred to in this commitment is situated in the county of King, State of Washington, and described as follows: PARCEL A: A portion of Tract 39, Supplemental Plat of Meeker's First Addition to the Town of Kent, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 5 of Plats, page 96, in King County, Washington, said portion begin described as follows: Beginning at the northeast corner of said tract; thence west, 150 feet; thence south, 109 feet; thence east, 104 feet; thence southeasterly to a point on the east line of said Tract 39, a distance of 132 feet south of the northeast corner thereof; thence north to the point of beginning; EXCEPT that portion conveyed to the City of Kent for street purposes by Deed recorded under Recording Number 7210020097 AND EXCEPT that portion conveyed to the City of Kent by Deed recorded Match 17, 1987 under Recording Number 8703170472. PARCEL B: The east 15 feet of Tract 38, and together with Tract 39, Supplemental Plat of Meeker's First Addition to the Town of Kent, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 5 of Plats, page 96, in King County, Washington; EXCEPT that portion of Tract 39, described as follows: Beginning at the northeast corner of said Tract 39; thence west, 150 feet; thence south, 109 feet; thence east, 104 feet; (continued) EXHIBIT A PAGE 13 of 29 15 Order No. 411557-22 A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A Page 2 The land referred to in this commitment is situated in the county of King, State of Washington, and described as follows: Lot 3, Kent Short Plat Number SP-84-5, recorded under Recording Number 8409270783, being a portion of Parcel 2 of Kent Short Plat Number SP-76-13 recorded under Recording Number 7701130512', records of King County, Washington. END OF SCHEDULE A NOTE FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY: The following may be used as an abbreviated legal description on the documents to be recorded, per amended RCW 65.04. Said abbreviated legal description is not a substitute for a complete legal description within the body of the document. Ptn. Tract 43, Supplemental Plat of Meeker's First Add. , Vol. 15, pg. 96 EXHIBIT A PAGE 14 of 29 �j A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT Order No. 411558 SCHEDULE A Page 2 The land referred to in this commitment is situated in the county of King, State of Washington, and described as follows: Lot 1, Kent Short Plat Number SP-84-5, recorded under Recording Number 8409270783, being a portion of Parcel 2 of Kent Short Plat Number SP-76-13 recorded under Recording Number 7701130512, records of King County, Washington. END OF SCHEDULE A NOTE FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY: The following may be used as an abbreviated legal description on the documents to be recorded, per amended RCW 65.04 . Said abbreviated legal description is not a substitute for a complete legal description within the body of the document. Ptn. Tract 43, Supplemental Plat of Meeker's First Add. , Vol. 15, pg. 96 EXHIBIT A .� PAGE 15 of 29 Order No. 411559 7j# A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A Page 2 The land referred to in this commitment is situated in the county of King, State of Washington, and described as follows: Lot 2 of City of Kent Short Plat SP-83-7, as recorded under Recording Number 8409270783, said Short Plat being a portion of Lot 43, Supplemental Plat of Meekers First Addition to the Town of Kent, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 5 of Plats, page 96, in King County, Washington. END OF SCHEDULE A I'1 NOTE FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY: The following may be used as an abbreviated legal description on the documents to be recorded, per amended RCW 65.04 . Said abbreviated legal description is not a substitute for a complete legal description within the body of the document. Ptn. Lot 43, Supplemental Plat of Meeker's First Addition to the Town of Kent rr' EXHIBIT A PAGE . .16 of 29 Order No. 411560 a S� A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A Page 2 The land referred to in this commitment is situated in the county of King, State of Washington, and described as follows: The east 790.01 feet as measured from the centerline of State Highway No. 5-M of the following described property: That portion of Lot 43, Supplemental Plat of Meeker' s First Addition to the Town of Kent, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 5 of Plats, page 96, in King County, Washington, lying westerly of SSH No. 5-M, and lying south of a line parallel to the north line of said tract and which line is 798 feet distant south therefrom as measured along the centerline of said highway, and north of that portion thereof conveyed to the State of Washington for road purposes by deeds recorded under Recording Numbers 7106080322 and 7805191158. END OF SCHEDULE A NOTE FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY: The following may be used as an abbreviated legal description on the documents to be recorded, per amended RCW 65.04. Said abbreviated legal description is not a substitute for a complete legal description within the body of the document. Ptn. of Lot 43, Supplemental Plat of Meeker's First Add. to the Town of Kent, Vol. 5, pg. 96 EXHIBIT A PAGE 17 of 29 Order No. 411561 -� A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A �. Page 2 The land referred to in this commitment is situated in the county of King, State of Washington, and described as follows: Parcel 1 of City of Kent Short Plat No. SPC-78-32, recorded December 19, 1978 under King County Recording Number 7812190862; being a portion of Tract 43, Supplemental Plat of Meekers First Addition to the Town of Kent, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 5 of Plats, page 96, in King County, Washington. END OF SCHEDULE A NOTE FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY: The following may be used as an abbreviated legal description on the documents to be recorded, per amended RCW 65.04. Said abbreviated legal description is not a substitute for a complete legal description within the body of the document. Tract 43, Supp. Plat of Meekers First Add. to Town of Kent, Vol. 5, pg. 96 EXHIBIT A PAGE 18 of 29 Order No. 411562 — A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A Page 2 The land referred to in this commitment is situated in the county of King, State of Washington, and described as follows: That portion of Tract 43, Supplemental Plat of Meeker's First Addition to the Town of' Kent, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 5 of Plats, page 96, in King County, Washington, lying south of Secondary State Highway No. 5-A (SR 516) , as condemned under King County Superior Court Cause No. 651332, lying westerly of Primary State Highway No. 5 (SR 167) , as condemned under King County Superior Court Cause No. 651332, and lying easterly of Secondary State Highway No. 2-M (SR 181) , as condemned in King County Superior Court 'Cause No. 685798, described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the centerlines of said SR 516 and SR 181 which intersection is known as SR 516 Engineers Station 208+31. 47 and SR 181 Engineers Station 12+21. 65; thence south 89041' 41" east along the centerline of said SR 516, a distance of 58.53 feet to Engineers Station 206+90.00; thence south 00018 ' 19" west at right angles to said centerline, a distance of 100.00 feet, to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; . thence south 7'34 '47" west along the easterly margin of said SR .181, a distance of 79.41 feet to a point which is 50.00 feet easterly of when measured at right angles to SR 181 Engineers Centerline Station 14+00.00; thence south 00°47 ' 42" west parallel to said centerline along said easterly margin, a distance of 100.00 feet; thence south 32010' 50" east along the easterly margin of the B line of said SR 181, a distance of 46.06 feet to a point that is 30.00 feet northerly from when measured at right angles to Engineers Centerline Station B - 10+76..540 which point is the point of curvature of a curve to the right having a radius of 96.00 feet, the center point of which bears south 01°51'28" east; thence easterly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 66°31 '27", a distance of 111.46 feet to a point that bears north 64°39'59" east from the center point of said curve; thence north 67017122" east a distance of 265. 46 feet -to the westerly margin of said SR 167; thence north 27023'47" west along said westerly margin 190.00 feet to an intersection with the southerly margin of said SR 516, said point being 100.00 feet southerly of, when measured at right angles to, Engineers Centerline Station 211+50.00; . EXHIBIT A PAGE 19 of 29 (legal description, continued) A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT Order No. 411564, SCHEDULE A Page 2 a The land referred to in this commitment is situated in the county of King, State of Washington, and described as follows: The north 150 feet of Tract 40 and the west 18.74 feet of the north 150 feet of Tract 41, Supplemental Plat of Meeker's First Addition to the Town of Kent, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 5 of Plats, page 96, in King County, Washington; EXCEPT those portions thereof conveyed to the City of Kent by deeds recorded under Recording Numbers 7301120023, 7301120025 and 8904170128; ALSO the north 53 feet of the south 106 feet of Tract 40 and the west 18 .74 feet of the north 53 feet of the south 106 feet of Tract 41, Supplemental Plat of Meeker's First Addition to the Town of Kent, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 5 of Plats, page 96, in King County, Washington; EXCPET that portion thereof conveyed to the State of Washington by deeds recorded under Recording Numbers 6025921 and 6025922; AND EXCEPT that portion thereof conveyed to the City of Kent by deed recorded under Recording Number 8904170128. END OF SCHEDULE A NOTE FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY: The following may be used as an abbreviated legal description on the documents to be recorded, per amended RCW 65.04. Said abbreviated legal description is not a substitute for a complete legal description within the body of the document. Tracts 40-41, Supp. Plat of Meeker's First Add. to Town of Kent, Vol. 5, pg. 96 EXHIBIT A PAGE 20 of 29 1 .�•�..-1 �'...wtiiY.C..s7tr� •w.G��+•,S'LT,N,� .r ._. ..i ii��l`: �� Order No. 411566-3/ A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A Page 2 The land referred to in this commitment is situated in the county of King, State of Washington, and described as follows: The south half of Lots 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29 and 30, Block A, Supplemental Plat of Meeker's First Addition to the Towne of Kent, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 5 of Plats, page 96, in King County, Washington. END OF SCHEDULE A NOTE FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY: The following may be used as an abbreviated legal description on the documents to be recorded, per amended RCW 65.04. Said abbreviated legal description is not a substitute for a complete legal description within the body of the document. Lots 23-30, Block A, Supl. Plat of Meeker's lot Add. to the Town of Kent, VS/P96 EXHIBIT A PAGE 21 of 29 �...�.i.-......�..r...--��err r?i..!i�..��yr.L.•i'Sw.LCi:fT.3iy� Order No. 411567-3.?W A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A Page 2 The land referred to in this commitment is situated in the county of King, State of Washington, and described as follows: The north half of Lots 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29 and 30, Block A, Supplemental Plat of Meeker's First Addition to the Town of Kent, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 5 of Plats, page 96, in King County, Washington. END OF SCHEDULE A r� NOTE FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY: The following may be used as an abbreviated legal description on the documents to be recorded, per •amended RCW 65.04. Said abbreviated legal description is not a substitute for a complete legal description within the body of the document. Ptn of Lots 23-30, Block A, Supl. Plat of Meeker's 1st add. to the Towne of Kent, VS/P96 EXHIBIT A PAGE 22 of 29 07 Order No. 411568 -�� A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A Page 2 The land referred to in this commitment is situated in the county of King, State of Washington, and described as follows: Lots 1 and 2, and the west 10 feet of Lot 3, Block A, Supplemental Plat of Meeker's 1" Addition to the Town of Kent, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 5 of Plats, page 96, in King County, Washington. END OF SCHEDULE A NOTE FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY: The following may be used as an abbreviated legal description on the documents to be recorded, per amended RCW 65.04 . Said abbreviated legal description is not a substitute for a complete legal description within the body of the document. Lots 1-2, ptn. Lot 3, Block A, Supp. Plat of Meeker's 1st Add. to Town of Kent, Vol. 5, pg. 96 EXHIBIT A PAGE 23 of 29 i^ Order No. 911569-,A,& A.L.T.A. COMMITMEPII;,, SCHEDULE A Page 2 The land referred to in this commitment is situated in the county of King, State of Washington, and described as follows: The south 133 feet of the west 80 feet of Block 21, (also known as Lot 21) , and the south 133 feet of Block 22, (also known as Lot 22) , Supplemental Plat of Meeker's First Addition to the Town of Kent, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 5 of Plats, page 96, in King County, Washington; EXCEPT that portion thereof. condemned for highway purposes in King County Superior Court Cause Number 695462. END OF SCHEDULE A NOTE FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY: The following may be used as an abbreviated legal description on the documents to be recorded, per amended RCW 65.04. Said abbreviated legal description is not a substitute for a complete legal description within the' body of the document. Ptn. Lots 21-22, Supplemental Plat of Meeker's 1st Add. to Town of Kent, Vol. 5, pg. 96 EXHIBIT A p.AGE 24 of 29 .. ..��,...:cGia..a�.r:+,:ea�.. .�.""" '�j...tJ� `•3is.`s.•.usu,,..M Order No. 411570 -35 A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT �! SCHEDULE A y ,* Page 2 The land referred to in this commitment is situated .in the county of King, State of Washington, and described as follows: Tract 20 and Tract 21; EXCEPT the west 80 feet of the south 133 feet thereof; the north 80 feet of Tract 22; the south 134. 5 feet of Tract 23; TOGETHER WITH that portion of Tracts 16 and 17 lying west of Primary State Highway Number 5 and south of the easterly production of the north line of the south 134.5 feet of said Tract 23; All in Supplemental Plat of Meeker's First Addition to the Town .of Kent, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 5 of Plats, page 96, in King County, Washington. END OF SCHEDULE A 9 NOTE FOR .INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. The following may be used as an abbreviated legal description on the documents to be recorded, per amended RCW 65.04. Said abbreviated legal description is not a substitute for a complete legal description within the body of the document. Lots 16, 17, 21-23, Supplemental Plat of Meeker's First Add. to the Town of Kent, V5/PG96 EXHIBIT A PAGE 25 of 29 Order No. 411571_3 6 A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT �- SCHEDULE A Page, 2 The land referred to in this commitment is situated in the county of King, State of Washington, and described as follows: That portion of Block 23, Meeker's Supplemental Plat of the First Addition of the Town of Kent, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 5 of Plats, page 96, in King County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the east boundary line of said Block 23, which is 134.5 feet north of the southeast corner thereof; thence north along the east boundary line of said Block 23, a distance of 168.5 feet; thence west 516.8 feet to the west boundary line of said Block 23; thence south along said west boundary line 168.5 feet; thence east 516.8 feet to the point of beginning; EXCEPT that portion of said block lying within Washington Street. END OF SCHEDULE A NOTE FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY: The following may be used. as an abbreviated legal description on the documents to be recorded, per amended RCW 65.04, Said abbreviated legal description is not a substitute for a complete legal description within the body of the document. Ptn. Lot 23, Meeker's Supplemental Plat of the First Add. to Town of Kent, Vol. 5, pg. 96 EXHIBIT A PAGE 26 of 29 Order No. 411575Q A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A Page' 2 The land referred to in this commitment is situated in the county of King, State of Washington, and described as follows: The west 187.73 feet of the north half; EXCEPT the south 30 feet thereof deeded to City of Kent .under Recording Number 4558452 of the following described tract: Tract 24, Supplemental• Plat of Meeker's First Addition to the Town of Kent, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 5 of Plats, page 96, in King County, Washington; EXCEPT the north 85 feet; AND EXCEPT the south 71 feet thereof. END OF SCHEDULE A NOTE FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY: The following may be used as an abbreviated legal description on the documents to be recorded, per amended RCW 65.04 . Said abbreviated legal description is not a substitute for a complete legal description within the body of the document. Ptn. Lot 24, Supplemental Plat of Meeker's First Addition to the Town of Kent, Vol. 5/Pg. 96 EXHIBIT A PAGE 27 of 29 �—. A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT Order No. 411577 44 SCHEDULE A Page. 2 The land referred to in this commitment is situated in the county of King, State of Washington, and described as follows: Lot 9, Block 7, Kenthurst Addition to the City of Kent, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 57 of Plats, pages 58 and 59, in King County, Washington. END OF SCHEDULE A NOTE FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY: The following may be used as an abbreviated legal description on the documents to be recorded, per amended RCW 65.04. Said abbreviated legal description is not a substitute for a complete legal description within the body of the document. Lot 9, Block 7, Kenthurst Add. to City of Kent, Vol. 57, pgs. 58-59 EXHIBIT A PAGE 28 of 29 Order No. 411578 4cT� A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A Page 2 The land referred to in this commitment is situated in the county of King, State of Washington, and described as follows: Lot 1, Block 7, Kenthurst Addition to the City of Kent, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 57 of Plats, pages 58' and 59, in King County, Washington; EXCEPT that portion thereof deeded to the City of Kent for streets by instrument recorded under Recording Number 6517032 . END OF SCHEDULE A NOTE FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY: The following may be used as an abbreviated legal description on the documents to be recorded, per amended RCW 65.04 . Said abbreviated legal description is not a substitute for a complete legal description within the body of the document. Lot 1, Block 7, Kenthurst Add. to the City of Kent, V57/P58-59 EXHIBIT A PAGE 29 of 29 ``� g l_: R I= - - — rows n. pR sul I 1 I I I � I I� I I 1 I S II I — © ® I I -- -_ --- 1 l ------ - - ---------------- -----� -------- W.NEWER n. rr.MEEKER n. is-- F IY W.HARMSON L I 1 - ___M.smrrm n. N.smrrm n. � I I , — 21 ---------_--_=`j --------- J j W.�11MG n. •-J �-----------------_-�_- ---,--------♦ -------------- ____-__-__-----._ --- ------------ Kent City Council Meeting Date March 6 , 2001 Category Consent Calendar 1 . SUBJECT: SALE OF SURPLUS EQUIPMENT - AUTHORIZE 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works Committee, authorization to declare certain vehicles no longer needed by the City as surplus and authorize the sale thereof at the next public auction. 3 . EXHIBITS: Public Works Director memorandum r 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc . ) 5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 6H COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT i^ Mike H. Martin, Deputy Chief Administrative Officer PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Don E. Wickstrom, P.E. Public Works Director 400 \1147 Phone:253-856-5500 K E N T Fax: 253-856-6500 WASHINGTON Address: 220 Fourth Avenue S. Kent,WA 98032-5895 Date: February 21, 2001 Tot. Public Works Cw ttee From: Don Wickstrom, Public Works Director Subject: Surplus Equipment—Authorization Attached is a list of Equipment Rental vehicles no longer needed by the City and have been replaced. We are requesting that they be declared as surplus and sold at the next public auction. MOTION: Recommend authorization to declare the listed vehicles as surplus and authorize the sale thereof at the next public auction. / surplusequipment FEB 2 + DEPT PUBLIC woRKS ENGINEERING Don E.Wickstrom, Director OPERATIONS DIVISION Larry R. Blanchard, Manager • K EN T Phone:253-856-5656 WASHINGTON Fax: 253-856-6600 Mailing Address: 220 Fourth Avenue South Kent, WA 98032-5895 Location Address: 5821 South 240th Date: February 20, 2001 To: Don Wickstrom, Public Works Director From: Alice Conrad, Fleet Superintendent 4Z-"� Through: Larry Blanchard, Operations Manager Subject: Request for Council Approval to Surplus Replaced Equipment The following vehicles have been replaced and are no longer cost effective for maintenance and repairs. I would like to transport these vehicles as soon as possible for the next scheduled public auction. We are searching for other agencies that may be interested in purchasing the used police vehicles and will proceed to sell this way if it appears to be a more reasonable or cost effective method. Please let me know if there is additional information needed from me or the fleet services division to obtain the needed surplus authorization. 1002 1991 Ford Taurus, s/n 192948, l/n 09606D 3105 1995 Ford Crown Victoria, s/n 167060, 1/n 20601 D 3120 1996 Ford Crown Victoria, s/n 116800, I/n 206310 3129 1990 Chevrolet Caprice, s/n 1 G 1 BL5471 LA141610, l/n 08746D 3188 1999 Ford Crown Victoria, s/n 2FAFP71 W4XX155508, I/n 27055D (Accident totaled) 5388 1987 Chevrolet Caprice, s/n 150035, l/n 018630 7613 1995 Ford Taurus, s/n 313531, l/n 20607D 8717 1985 Ford F250 Pickup, s/n A99322, I/n 20639D 8730 1963 1/12 Ton Flatbed Truck, s/n 344518, I/n D02202 8751 1989 Chevrolet Celebrity Sedan, s/n 192680, I/n 04779D 8753 1990 Dodge Spirit, s/n 1 B3XA4637LF858086, l/n 0574D 8758 1989 Ford Window Van, s/n A36893, l/n 05734D 8761 1988 Chevrolet Celebrity Sedan, s/n 225782, l/n 03930D 8767 1987 Dodge Pickup, s/n 480775, l/n 01839D 8768 1987 Dodge Pickup, s/n 480776, l/n 01837D Thanks. Cc: Mike Martin Brad Haydock Dianne Sullivan Ref: P:tfeebsurplus/memo requesting council approvaLdoc � e i Kent City Council Meeting '— Date March 6, 2001 Category Consent Calendar 1 . SUBJECT: ALLEY VACATION BETWEEN 1ST AND 2ND AVENUES AND SMITH AND TEMPERANCE STREETS - ORDINANCE 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Adoption of Ordinance No. vacating a portion of unused alleyway generally between Temperance and West Smith Streets, lying between 1st and 2nd Avenue. 3 . EXHIBITS:. Ordinance with Exhibit A 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Staff (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc . ) 5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS : 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: r ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 6I r ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, relating to the vacation of streets, vacating portion of an unused alleyway generally between Temperance and West Smith Streets, lying between First and Second Avenues in the City of Kent. WHEREAS, a petition to vacate an alleyway was filed with the City of Kent by Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority, the owner of real property located on both sides of the alleyway generally between Temperance and West Smith Street, lying between First and Second Avenues in the City of Kent, King County, Washington; and WHEREAS, the Kent Planning Services Division processed this petition and secured technical facts pertinent to the question of this vacation, and WHEREAS, the Kent City Council fixed a time for a public hearing on the petition and the hearing was held with proper notice on February 6, 2001, in the City Council Chambers of the Kent City Hall; and WHEREAS, the Planning Services Division recommended that the City Council approve the petition with the following conditions: (1) the petitioner shall cap/disconnect/plug/etc. all City utilities that exist within the alleyway in accordance with 1 Alley Vacation — 1st and 2nd/Smith & Temperance and as approved by the Public Works Department, and(2) the vacation shall exclude that portion of the alley right-of-way which lies within the area of additional West Smith Street right-of-way needed for improvement to the Second Avenue and West Smith Street intersection. WHEREAS, after the public hearing on February 6, 2001,the City Council approved the vacation with the conditions recommended by staff and approved by Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the alleyway sought to be vacated is: (1) a dedicated alley that is presently unused; (2) not abutting on a body of water and, therefore, not suitable for acquisition for port purposes, boat moorage or launching sites, park, viewpoint,recreational or education purposes, or other public use; and(3) a vacation which is in the public interest; and WHEREAS, the City Council has directed the preparation of an ordinance vacating the portion of said street; NOW,THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT,WASHINGTON,DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The foregoing recitals are incorporated as if fully set forth herein. SECTION 2. That portion of an alleyway between Temperance and West Smith Street, lying between First and Second Avenues in the City of Kent as described in Exhibit A,which is attached and incorporated herein by this reference,which excludes that portion needed for the West Smith Street Improvement project, is hereby vacated. 2 Alley Vacation— 1st and 2nd/Smith & Temperance SECTION 3. As a condition of this vacation the Petitioner shall cap/disconnect/plug/etc. all City utilities that exist within the alleyway in accordance with and as approved by the Public Works Department. SECTION 4. No vested rights shall be affected by the provisions of this ordinance. SECTION S. —Severability. If any one or more section, subsections, or sentences of this Ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 6. —Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty(30) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law. r' JIM WHITE, MAYOR ATTEST: BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: ROGER LUBOVICH, CITY ATTORNEY 3 Alley Vacation — Ist and 2nd/Smith & Temperance PASSED: day of , 2001. APPROVED: day of , 2001. PUBLISHED: day of , 2001. I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No. passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the City of Kent as hereon indicated. (MC) BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK P:\Civil\Ord6�e\V=meAlley-TengerenceSmith,doc i 4 Alley Vacation 1st and 2nd/Smith & Temperance �-_ EXHIBIT A THAT CERTAIN ALLEY RIGHT-OF-WAY LYING SOUTH OF THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF- WAY LINE OF TEMPERANCE STREET AND NORTH OF THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SMITH STREET AND ABUTTING LOTS 1-12, BLOCK 3 OF RAMSAY'S ADDITION TO THE TOWN OF KENT, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 16 OF PLAT PAGES 89, IN KING COUNTY, WASINGTON; EXCEPT THE SOUTH 22.00 FEET THEREOF. r Kent City Council Meeting Date March 6 , 2001 Category. Other Business 1 . SUBJECT: WATER SHORTAGE EMERGENCY REGULATIONS - ORDINANCE 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Due to the significant water shortages the City of Kent may experience in the next few months, staff has reviewed and rewritten the water shortage emergency regulations code, Chapter 7 . 13 of the Kent City Code . Chapter 7 . 13 provides a framework for enacting emergency ordinances relating to restrictions on the use of water. This item is being submitted to the Council for the first time in order to expedite the effective date of this code in the event the City needs to take action in the near future to restrict the use of water in the City of Kent. 3 . EXHIBITS: Ordinance t1 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Staff (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS : 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:CX Councilmember 4A*,, _moves, Councilmember lX/W seconds adoption of Ordinance No. .3 5 50 repealing Chapter 7 . 13 of the Kent City Code in its entirety and enacting a new Chapter 7 . 13, entitled "Water Shortage Emergency Regulations . " DISCUSSION: �il�-dam r� ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 7A ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, repealing Chapter 7.13 of the Kent City Code in its entirety and enacting a new Chapter 7.13 entitled "Water Shortage Emergency Regulations" relating to the availability of water within the City. WHEREAS, the City Council finds that from time to time, the availability of water within the City may be reduced due to lack of supply or lack of transmission capabilities; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that in order to protect the health, safety, or welfare of the citizens of the City and to guarantee the availability of water for human consumption, sanitation, or fire protection, restrictions on the use of water may, from time to time,be necessary; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to amend the City Code to update its water shortage emergency regulations; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Chapter 7.13 of the Kent City Code, entitled "Water Shortage Emergency Regulations," is hereby repealed in its entirety. 1 Water Shortage Emergency Regulations SECTION A new section, section 7.13, entitled "Water Shortage Emergency Regulations,"is hereby added to the Kent City Code to read as follows: CHAPTER 7.13. WATER SHORTAGE EMERGENCY REGULATIONS Sec. 7.13.010. Purpose. The City Council finds that from time to time, the availability of water within the City may be reduced due to lack of supply or lack of transmission capabilities. The City Council further finds that in order to protect the health, safety, or welfare of the citizens of the city and to guarantee the availability of water for human consumption, sanitation, or fire protection, restrictions on the use of water may, from time to time,be necessary. Sec. 7.13.020. Definitions. As used in this section, the following terms shall have the following meanings: 1. Customer means any person who uses the water supply of the City of Kent. 2. Director means the director of the Department of Public Works. 3. Drought means any period in which water within the City of Kent is in short supply due to low water levels within City wells or other areas from which the City draws its water. 4. Water or Water Supply means all water of the water utility or water supply system of the City of Kent, regardless of its source. Sec. 7.13.030. Emergency- ordinance. A. Whenever it appears to the Director of the Department of Public Works that a drought condition either exists or is forecast to occur within the City of Kent or within portions thereof, the City Council may pass an ordinance restricting or prohibiting the use of water. Unless otherwise set forth in the ordinance, the ordinance, and the restrictions set forth therein, shall expire twelve (12) months after the passage of the 2 Water Shortage Emergency Regulations ordinance. An ordinance passed pursuant to this section may be amended or repealed during the period in which it is enacted as deemed necessary by the City Council. Sec. 7.13.040. Ordinance- publication. The full text of an ordinance passed pursuant to this chapter shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation for a minimum of one day. The publication required by this section shall satisfy the publication requirements of RCW 35A.12.160. Sec. 7.13.050. Water use-limitations - exceptions. A. Subject to subsection (B) of this section, any ordinance passed pursuant to this chapter may limit or prohibit the following uses of water: 1. Irrigating or watering of landscaping, grass, plants, vegetables, vines, trees, shrubbery, gardens, ground cover, or any other similar vegetation; and/or 2. Washing of "motor vehicles" or water going "vessels" as those terms are defined in RCW 46.04.320, RCW 46.04.670, and section 352-60-030 of the Washington Administrative Code, as those statutes and sections are now enacted or hereafter amended or recodified, and/or 3. Washing of sidewalks, porches, driveways, or other outdoor surfaces; and/or 4. The use of water for recreational purposes, such as running a sprinkler system or maintaining a pool used for swimming; and/or 5. Any other water use that may limit the availability of water for human consumption, sanitation, or fire protection. B. Customers whose historic monthly average water use for the period from May 15 through August 31 exceeds one hundred thirty-three thousand six hundred ninety (133,690) cubic feet per month, or who operate a business in which the essential function of the business is the sale of plants, vegetables or other vegetation, hereinafter referred to as "large water users," shall not, by operation of an ordinance passed pursuant to subsection (A), be completely prohibited from all use of water; PROVIDED, that the director may limit the number of days in which large water users r. 3 Water Shortage Emergency Regulations use water that would normally be subject to a complete prohibition authorized by -� subsection (A). The days in which large water users are permitted to use water in a manner that would normally be subject to a complete prohibition as authorized by subsection(A) shall be designated by the director. C. A customer that operates a properly licensed public motor vehicle washing facility, such as a car wash, shall not be subject to limitations on washing motor vehicles as set forth in subsection(A). D. A customer that operates a properly licensed business, other than a car wash, in which the washing of motor vehicles is required to perform the essential functions of the business shall not be subject to the limitations on washing motor vehicles as set forth in subsection (A). This exception shall not apply to motor vehicle dealerships or other customers in the business of selling or renting motor vehicles, except to the extent that washing the vehicles is necessary for the repair of the vehicles. E. Recreational facilities in which the use of water is essential to the operation of the facility and which are open to the public shall not be subject to the limitations on the use of water for recreation as set forth in subsection(A). F. The director may, for good cause, order that the limitations or prohibitions set forth in an ordinance passed pursuant to this chapter shall not apply to certain categories of customers if it is shown that the application of such limitations or prohibitions will cause substantial economic harm to such customers or will be detrimental to the health, safety, and welfare of such customers or the public. Sec. 7.13.060. Penalties - enforcement. A. Unless otherwise stated in an ordinance passed pursuant to this chapter, a first violation of any ordinance passed pursuant to this chapter shall be a class 3 ($50) civil infraction as proscribed by RCW 7.80.1210, as now enacted or hereafter amended. Unless otherwise stated in an ordinance passed pursuant to this chapter, a second or subsequent violation of any ordinance passed pursuant to this chapter shall be a class 1 ($250) civil infraction as proscribed by RCW 7.80.120, as now enacted or hereafter amended. Infractions shall be processed pursuant to the authority and provisions set 4 Water Shortage "1 Emergency Regulations forth in Chapter 7.80 RCW, as now enacted or hereafter amended, and the Infraction Rules for Courts of Limited Jurisdiction. B. Unless otherwise stated in an ordinance passed pursuant to this chapter, as an alternative to subsection (A) of this section, a third or subsequent violation of any ordinance passed pursuant to this chapter may be charged as a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment in jail for a maximum term fixed by the court of not more than ninety (90) days, or a fine in an amount fixed by the court of not more than one thousand dollars ($1,000), or both such imprisonment and fine. C. For the purposes of subsection A, and pursuant to RCW 7.80.040, as now enacted or hereafter amended, and the Infraction Rules for Courts of Limited Jurisdiction, the following persons shall be "enforcement officers" and "citing officers" authorized to enforce the provisions of an infraction which is in violation of an ordinance passed pursuant to this section and issue notices of infraction: 1. Police officers of the City of Kent 2. Fire officials of the City of Kent r: 3. Code enforcement officers of the City of Kent 4. The Director of Public Works or his or her designee 5. Any other person authorized by the Mayor to enforce the provisions of the ordinance. Sec. 7.13.070. Emergency ordinance - precedence. The provisions of sections 7.13.050 and 7.13.060 of the Kent City Code may be modified or superceded by an ordinance passed pursuant to this chapter. SECTION 3. -Severability. If any one or more section, subsections, or sentences of this Ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect. 5 Water Shortage Emergency Regulations SECTION 4. -E ective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty(30) days from and after passage as provided by law. JIM WHITE, MAYOR ATTEST: BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: ROGER LUBOVICH, CITY ATTORNEY PASSED: day of , 2001. APPROVED: day of , 2001. PUBLISHED: day of , 2001. I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No. passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the City of Kent as hereon indicated. (SEAL) BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK PACivil\Ordinance\Wum Shortage Enwgency Regulaiona.doc 6 Water Shortage Emergency Regulations REPORTS FROM STANDING COMMITTEES AND STAFF A. COUNCIL PRESIDENT B. OPERATIONS COMMITTEE C. PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE D. PUBLIC WORKS E. PLANNING COMMITTEE F. PARKS COMMITTEE G. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS REPORTS FROM SPECIAL COMMITTEES OPERATIONS COMMITTEE MINUTES JANUARY 16, 2001 COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Rico Yingling, Judy Woods, Tom Brotherton (sitting in for Tim Clark) STAFF PRESENT: Brent McFall, May Miller, Cliff Craig, John Hillman, Jackie Bicknell PUBLIC PRESENT: Dave Trageser The meeting was called to order by Chair Rico Yingling at 4:32 PM. Approval of Minutes of December 5, 2000 Committee Member Tom Brotherton moved to approve the minutes of December 5, 2000. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Judy Woods and passed 3-0. Approval of Vouchers of December 15, 2000, December 29, 2000, and January 12, 2001 Finance Director May Miller added the vouchers of December 15, 2000 and December 29, 2000 and made a correction to the date for the January vouchers from January 15, 2001 to January 12, 2001. Judy Woods moved to recommend approval of the vouchers dated December 15 and December 29, 2000 and January 12, 2001. The motion was seconded by Tom Brotherton. Rico Yingling inquired about the Lyle Sumek bill of$7,346.51 on the December 15, 2000 vouchers in the Council Expense Account. He asked Ms. Miller to provide more detail on those /-� expenses at a future meeting. The motion was voted on and passed 3-0. LID Bond Underwriter Contract May Miller said a few years ago the City had split its bonds between General Obligation and Revenue bonds, and the LID portion was bid out to Dain Rausher. Dain Rausher has reorganized its local office and isn't doing the bond service anymore, so the City put out a request for proposal to seven interested firms and advertised in the newspaper. Two formal proposals came back with bids, and staff is recommending awarding the contract to Banc of America. The second firm, Seattle-Northwest Securities will be listed as the alternate. Ms. Miller introduced Dave Trageser, Vice President of Banc of America Securities, Seattle Office. Mr. Trageser said he had worked with the City of Kent for the last several years for Dain Rausher, his former employer, and is familiar with City staff and the LID program. Banc of America has experience with the bond process and currently works with about 20 cities that do non rated LID types of projects. Mr. Trageser said the bond market is doing great and interest rates are going down. Judy Wood moved to recommend to Council to select Banc of America Securities LLC as the City's Local Improvement District bond underwriter for a three year term with an option to extend for two additional years and the option to utilize Seattle-Northwest Securities Corporation as the alternative. And to proceed with the issuance of LID 351 special assessment bonds in the amount of$5,367,216.50 utilizing Banc of America r-- Operations Committee, 1/16/01 Page 2 of 3 Securities LLC in a negotiated sale. The motion was seconded by Tom Brotherton and passed 3-0. November Finance Report and Year End Report Rico Yingling said the Year End Report would be postponed until the next meeting. May Miller explained that the Washington State RCW requires that the books be kept open through January 201h to receive any bills that may come in. The City would then have a few more days to get the bills paid. Ms. Miller said the Year End Report in February would be a preliminary report as some items may come in after-the end date. Through the month of November, revenue was 5.2% over budget compared to last year at this time when it was 1.2% over budget. Property Taxes are always very predictable and are expected to be at 98-99% of budget when the final amounts come in. Sales Tax is a result of the economy, and the prediction is that there may be some manufacturing slowdown which could have a faster effect on Kent because of the big wholesale manufacturing area and the large percentage of sales tax that comes from that. Through December, Sales Tax (which is from October sales) was 8.3% over budget. Rico Yingling asked if the sales from November and December, because of the two month lag, would count towards the 2000 budget. Ms. Miller said one more month would go to the 2000 budget. As soon as that figure is received, it is added in and the number for the same time last year is subtracted out. The figures will change one more time after an accrual is done, but the final amount is expected to be quite close to the budget. Building Permits revenue,which follows low interest rates to some extent, was down in November. When interest rates are high, people might not get as many building permits or do as much improvement. The majority of Kent's building permit revenue comes from commercial development, although there has been a significant number of residential permits also. Page 9 shows the value of the permits, which is 1.8% over last year. Each year the value of the completed permits is added to the property tax, and as long as Kent is growing, additional property tax will continue to come in. Chief Administrative Officer Brent McFall said the fees were higher this year, but the permit value was almost the same as the value from last year. Ms. Miller continued with Recreation Fees and said that because of the timing of classes and when the brochures were sent out, the revenue had changed some but was still over budget. Water and Sewer were very close to budget. Water rates increased last year and so the budget graph was increased to correspond with that. The sewer operation was a little under budget, but the shortfall was caused by one retroactive adjustment in the sewer/drainage fund. There was almost a 10% increase in revenue in the golf course operations. The increase took place during a construction time and did not include any restaurant revenue. Brent McFall added that construction in the clubhouse area impacted the miniature golf operation even though the miniature golf course itself wasn't under construction. The miniature course will be marketed as _ a party facility with food service as well as a miniature golf course and with the more aggressive marketing, there should be a turnaround in that operation in 2001. Rico Yingling asked where the water came from for the golf course. Mr. McFall replied that the 18 hole championship course had its own well located in the extreme southwest comer of the Operations Committee, 1/16/01 Page 3 of 3 course. Mr. Yingling questioned if there could be any ecological danger to the well. Mr. McFall said it was a very deep well that didn't interact with the river. The City also has water rights out of the river that is utilized for the par three course, and that is still irrigated primarily by hose and sprinkler and is very labor intensive. One of the projects for 2001 will be an automated irrigation system to irrigate the par 3 course. The water for both golf courses is a secure source and is not linked to the City's domestic water supply. May Miller said the adjustment column on page 15 of the report takes into consideration the variances from the budget, which right now shows $192,648 over what was budgeted to end the year. Page 16.shows the number of vacant positions. There was a more active work force this year as opposed to last year when revenue was down and positions were held vacant longer to help offset the revenue shortage. Pages 17 and 18 show the CIP Fund,which is about$1 million ahead of forecast. That revenue comes almost entirely from real estate excise tax,primarily from the sale of commercial valley properties. Brent McFall commented that real estate excise tax is very volatile and the trend line is consistently upward, but there may be wide variations on a year to year basis or quarter to quarter basis in the trend line. May Miller added that the tax comes from one time only projects and if it were to come in under budget, some of the one time only projects could be deferred until the money did come in. In response to Tom Brotherton's concern about the reserve money, Brent McFall explained that �^ the ending fund balance from the last year is not rolled to the top of the page as an income/revenue item for the following year. It is shown at the bottom of the page in the beginning fund balance amount, and oftentimes an expenditure may appear greater than revenue, but the fund balances are there and are used from year to year as part of the cash flow and part of the over collection of revenues. The 10% strategic reserve is budgeted as a reserve that comes off the bottom line and is shown designated as reserves. It's there if needed, but it's not floating around as an addition to the ending fund balance that's not really available. May Miller said this year's budget was started with over$2 million above that of 1999 and has continued to increase, which means the City has continued to budget conservatively. The meeting was adjourned at 5:05 PM. Jackie Bicknell City Council Secretary PARKS COMMITTEE MINUTES JANUARY 9, 2001 COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Judy Woods, Connie Epperly, Tom Brotherton STAFF PRESENT: John Hodgson, Lori Flemm, Bill Wolinski,Brenda Abney, Lori Hogan, Ronda Simons, Charlie Lindsey,Jackie Bicknell PUBLIC PRESENT: Gary Young, Carol McPherson,Wes House The meeting was called to order by Chair Judy Woods at 4:05 PM. There were two items added to the agenda: Voice Stream Wireless Lease, added as item 4; and BMX Park, added as item 6. Approval of Minutes of November 14, 2000 Committee Member Tom Brotherton moved to approve the minutes of December 5, 2000. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Connie Epperly and passed 3-0. 2001 City Art Plan/Five Year City Art Plan Parks Program Coordinator Brenda Abney said the Five Year Art Plan is updated each year and extended to include another year as the current year is solidified. She described the projects for. 2001. • Kent Commons: The Millennium Art Project at the Kent Commons is a continuation of a /^ project started last year. The implementation budget contains S65,500 and left over planning money from last year brings the total budget to $73,000 for the project. A major artwork installation for the exterior entryway at Kent Commons will replace the current artwork, which will be removed from site as soon as the new art is ready to go in place. • Ice Arena: The Kent Arts Commission is interested in putting a significant sculpture artwork in the entry to the new Ice Arena being built on West James Street. The Ice Arena is a public/private partnership between the City of Kent and Urban Landmarks. The work will be designed around the ice arena function and planned for attractiveness to the clientele of families and kids. The proposed budget is $35,000. • Canterbury Park: Artwork proposed for Canterbury Park, which is a new neighborhood park yet to be built,will be a community effort with the community involved in working with the artist to create the artwork. The budget is $12,000. • East Hill Skate Park: Reclamation Art Projects are used in areas that have high use by youth, and youth are involved in creating the artwork along with a public artist. The East Hill Skate Park,yet to be developed, is the site for the 2001 reclamation art project. The proposed budget is $6,000. • Service Club Ballfields: The Service Club Ballfields are in the planning stage and there is $5,000 in the budget for art and bringing in an artist to work with the developers of the sites. Parks Committee, 1/9/01 Page 2 of 6 • Portable Art: Portable Art is two dimensional artworks purchased from the Canterbury Fine ..� Arts Show to go into public facilities. The proposed budget is$4,000. Other expenses included in the budget are those for administration,maintenance, insurance, professional services, and miscellaneous postage and printing. The total art budget for 2001 is $206,600. Tom Brotherton questioned how much public involvement was planned for the projects. Ms. Abney said ideas are presented to the community to receive feedback, and on projects such as the Community Art Project and the Reclamation project, the community is involved in planning, execution, and all phases of the installation of the artwork. Parks Director John Hodgson asked Brenda Abney to explain the planning process that Parks went through with the recent Millennium Art Project for the Commons. Ms. Abney said the first step in the planning process was inclusion of the project in the City Art Plan. It then went through approval of the Visual Arts Committee of the Kent Arts Commission, the full Arts Commission, the Parks Committee, and the City Council. Input was received from the community,people who worked in and used the Commons facility, and from the Kent Arts Commission members in developing a prospectus. The prospectus was sent out to artists and a public call went out for artists on the City's web site. Several people applied, and a jury, consisting of a Councilmember, artists, community members, and Kent Arts Commission members,chose three finalists. The three finalists presented their projects to the public in the lobby of the Kent Commons at a recent basketball jamboree, and hundreds of people, kids and parents,were involved in voting and commenting on their favorite project. All of that information was then forwarded to the jury to use during the final selection process. In describing the City's art funding, Ms. Abney recalled that an ordinance was implemented 25 years ago that designated$2.00 per capita for the implementation of artworks and administration of the art program. The fund is a revolving fund and the money can either be used each year or saved up for bigger projects that span a few years of time. The majority of the money goes into neighborhood parks and all of it is used in public facilities. The projects planned for 2002 through 2006 are capital projects,projects in parks, and community artworks. One project for 2002 is improving and cleaning up the train corridor and implementing artwork there. That project will continue into 2003 and will possibly involve the community and an international exchange artist. Capital projects are proposed for the Service Club Ballfields, Green River Disabled Fishing Access, West Hill neighborhood park, East Hill Facility#1, and Valley Floor Athletic Complex (planning in 2005 and extending into 2007). For 2004, a commemorative artwork is proposed that will honor people who served primarily in military functions. Carol McPherson, Chair of the Arts Commission, described the Reclamation Art Projects and said they are targeted to heavily vandalized areas. An artist is brought in to work with a targeted group of young people who live in or feel ownership of an area. The several projects that have been done have all been very successful and the Commission wants to see Reclamation Art Projects continue. The Millennium Project has significant public involvement with a time -, cr Parks Committee, 1/9/01 Page 3 of 6 capsule element, and the public will be participating in determining items to go into the capsule �-. and planning when it will be opened. Ms. McPherson said there are a lot of great parks projects that are bringing art into the Parks and giving upcoming young artists in the community and surrounding areas opportunities to grow and create in their art. Connie Epperly moved to accept the 2001 City Art Plan and the Five Year City Art Plan. The motion was seconded by Tom Brotherton and passed 3-0. IDC Industrial Property Donation—Accent Planning and Development Superintendent Lori Flemm said IDC Enterprises is developing an industrial/commercial site in Auburn that involves the filling of wetlands. To mitigate for those wetlands they're proposing an offsite location in Kent known as the Condor Site located in the Mill Creek drainage basin(as is the industrial development complex site in Auburn). IDC Enterprises wishes to donate the site to the City of Kent, and the City is interested in accepting the donation site as it will fulfill a valuable wildlife habitat in the Mill Creek Corridor. The site is located off of West Valley Highway, north of 262°d Street where Mill Creek feeds into the Green River and is directly across the river from the City's undeveloped Riverview Park property. The 5.04 acre site would help establish a riparian corridor in the area and would be an open space asset in the City of Kent. A wetland would be created and the area planted with shrubs and trees native to Western Washington. The developer, IDC Enterprises, will apply for all the permits and pay for all the costs associated with the development and construction of the wetland. Ms. Flemm said the permitting agencies would probably require 5-10 years of monitoring and maintenance to see that the wetland is established, and the City would like to enter into an agreement with IDC Enterprises whereby they would donate the site to the City but pay for the monitoring and maintenance required by the permitting agencies. Environmental Engineering Manager Bill Wolinski commented that with the Endangered Species Act the whole corridor is highly valuable and opens up a lot of potential for work along Mill Creek,which originates south of Highway 18 and goes through the valley floor. It is a highly valuable stream system that supports Chinook Salmon in the area, and Kent has been working with the City of Auburn and King County on a comprehensive restoration plan. The property donation creates a valuable resource opportunity to bring that highly sensitive area into City management. In response to Judy Woods question about the timeline for the project, Lori Flemm said the hope was to get the permits so construction could start in late summer. If the permits weren't received by then, grading would be done in 2002. Ms. Flemm added that the site would be fenced on the west and north sides and there would not be any public access. Tom Brotherton moved to accept the property donation and enter into an agreement with IDC Enterprises subject to the approval of the City of Kent Public Works Department and other permitting agencies. The motion was seconded by Connie Epperly and passed 3-0. r-� a� Parks Committee, 1/9/01 Page 4 of 6 IAC Youth Athletic Facilities Grant Lori Flemm said the Interagency Committee for Outdoor Recreation awarded the City of Kent a Youth Athletic Facility Grant for Kent Memorial Park,Fields 2 and 3, for an automatic irrigation system. The grant amount was $24,304 and the City will match that amount with CIP Funds. Also, a$100 Donation was'received from H. D. Fowler for irrigation equipment, and Facility Maintenance Contractors donated the design work for the irrigation system, valued at$960. Ms. Flemm said donations from the local community are instrumental to the City receiving grants from the state. She applauded Project Manager Shane Gilbertson for obtaining the grant with his first grant application. Tom Brotherton questioned how the City would say thank you to the donors. Ms. Flemm said the donors are usually recognized on the rules sign. Connie Epperly moved to accept and appropriate the IAC Youth Athletic Facilities Grant in the amount of$24,304 for improvements to the Kent Memorial Park. The motion was seconded by Tom Brotherton and passed 3-0. VoiceStream Wireless Lease Facilities Superintendent Charlie Lindsey said the City has a lease agreement from VoiceStream Wireless to place an array of antennas on the roof of the Centennial Center for$1,250 per month The lease is for five years with the option to renew three additional times for an overall 20 years. The lease has a 20% escalation clause for each renewal.-and any additional antennas would be an increase in fees. Tom Brotherton asked if there would be any connection between VoiceStream's systems and the building's systems or any other tenant's systems in terms of power and communication lines. Mr. Lindsey said VoiceStream would use power from the building,but would pay an additional $50 a month for the use. A demarcation on the second floor of the Centennial Center is where Qwest brings in their lines, and VoiceStream would have to connect to those lines. There would be no interference with the City telephone system. Connie Epperly asked if the funds were dedicated to a specific place. Mr. Lindsey said they would go towards paying off the debt of the Centennial Center. Parks Director John Hodgson said the City has other similar agreements. Tom Brotherton moved to authorize entering into an agreement with VoiceStream PCS III Corporation to lease a portion of the Centennial Office Building as outlined in the attached agreement. The motion was seconded by Connie Epperly and passed 3-0. Off-Leash Doe Park—Uadate Lori Flemm said that south county cities and King County met in December and again on January 5,2001 to discuss the need for and possible sites of an off-leash dog park in the South — County area. The cities of Federal Way,Auburn,Kent,Renton,Burien, and Des Moines, along with King County felt there was a regional need for an off-leash park and that the burden shouldn't be on just one city to develop such a park. All the cities indicated an interest in establishing a partnership because of the regional need. The cities couldn't commit to funding at �r'i Parks Committee, 1/9/01 Page 5 of 6 the meeting,but promised they would talk to their councils to see what level of funding they could commit to once a site is found. The communities are looking for publicly owned land so acquisition costs wouldn't have to be budgeted by either the county or the cities. Another meeting is scheduled the first Friday in February to discuss suitable sites, ownership of the sites, and possible partnerships. A regional site may be created as well as local sites within each jurisdiction. John Hodgson commented that it would be a slow and meticulous process to find the right site, but as the staff zeroes in on specific locations, the community would be involved in helping design, develop, and manage the facility. The group would use Marymoor Park in Redmond as the premier model to follow because of its success. That park came about from cooperation between a dog group and the government of King County. BMX Track John Hodgson said a BMX track has been one of the long range goals of the City for a number of years and it was part of the agreement with the Kentview development that they would help the City meet that need. Mr. Hodgson said he and Councilmember Connie Epperly met on the site with Polygon executives Gary Young and Eric Wells and were presented with the design for the already roughed out track,which should open by the middle of next summer. Connie Epperly recalled that it was seven years ago that she first marched into City Hall with 20 kids in t-shirts and signs saying they needed a BMX bike track. Ms. Epperly showed a sign presented by Polygon that was made for the track, and said she couldn't thank them enough for stepping up to the plate and creating the BMX Track Park. Gary Young, Polygon, said the location of the park is on the west side of the Green River at the foot of the new pedestrian bridge that was built as part of the Kentview development. The bridge enables people using the bicycle trail on the eastside of the river to cross over the river to Frager Road, and brings a link to the two corridors that have been established. The Kentview community development of Riverview and the PUD were deliberately designed to not have vehicle traffic access directly from the community onto Frager Road in order to preserve the historic integrity of the area. Mr. Young presented an exhibit showing an additional concept for the development of an extension from the BMX Park to create linkage to the community. The concept would provide an 80 feet wide buffer along the Frager Road corridor that would be landscaped, and with additional berming added for enhancement and to screen the road from the development. The link would come down through the Kentview community and tie into the pedestrian path along the corridor, linking into the BMX Park. A pathway on the perimeter of the BMX Park could be accessed from any point in the park, and people would be brought into the park in a controlled situation along the pathway rather than onto Frager Road. A pedestrian crosswalk and linkage point at the southernmost comer of the BMX Park would allow people to safely cross Frager Road to the pedestrian bridge. The concept would help to extend the park theme along the area ' and help preserve some of the character of Frager Road. The area would involve almost an acre or about 40,000 square feet, and would be additional land that Polygon would dedicate to the City as part of the process. � l Parks Committee, 1/9/01 Page 6 of 6 Tom Brotherton asked about landscaping along the lift station. Gary Young said some landscaping had already been done, but Polygon is working with the landscaper to see what other additional enhancements could be provided along the raver and to get the right plantings placed there. John Hodgson gave an update on two Parks projects. He said the permit had been received for the foundation of the Ice Arena and the construction had started. The steel framing for the building would be delivered sometime in mid Februarys,and opening of the Arena would probably be in late August. Work will start on the Service Club Ballfields in late April or the first of May. The meeting was adjourned at 4:52 PM. Jackie Bicknell City Council Secretary r SPECIAL PLANNING COMMITTEE MINUTES JANUARY 08, 2001 COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Tom Brotherton, Judy Woods, Tim Clark STAFF PRESENT: Fred Satterstrom, Pat Fitzpatrick, Charlene Anderson, Tom Brubaker, Kim Adams-Pratt, Mike Martin, Jackie Bicknell PUBLIC PRESENT: Keith Dearborn, Tom Sharp, Karen Johnson, Louise Lea, Greta Pfaff, S. Robert Pfaff, Kurt Wilson, Carol Caimes, Tim Alley, Dave Prutzman, Rita Bailie, Geraldine Miles, Gavin Miles, Barbara Clasen, Don Clasen, Joe Miles, Bill H. Williamson, Joseph Jovelli, Alan Stuckey The meeting was called to order by Chair Tom Brotherton at 4:02 PM. Approval of Minutes of December 11, 2000 Committee Member Tim Clark moved to approve the minutes of December 11, 2000. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Judy Woods and passed 3-0. Urban Separator Framework Policy Planning Manager Fred Satterstrom opened the discussion by saying the full Council had referred the Urban Separator Framework Policy issue back to the Planning Committee r^ because of its policy impact on the City. The Urban Separator is a land use issue about the density of mostly residential land and an environmental issue because it may deal with environmentally sensitive areas. It is also an issue of Kent's right to do land use planning within its own jurisdictional boundaries, and the regional policy ramifications in conjunction with that right. The Land Use and Planning Board looked at the land use implications and took extensive public testimony in a lengthy public review process. The recommendation has been forwarded to the Planning Committee for clarification before taking it back to the full City Council for final resolution. Senior Planner Charlene Anderson summarized the Land Use and Planning Board's recommendation. She indicated a display map showing the King County designated Urban Separator areas, and said the Board recommended keeping those designated areas as Urban Separators with a few exceptions of some deletions and additions. In Exhibit D, the "D" stands for those properties to be deleted from the Urban Separator. Two vested plat applications, Kingsley Glen at 144,h and the large South Ridge Plat, were recommended for deletion, as well as an area at the upper tip called Foxhall Short Plat, and a square area at 1241h and 282"d at the northeast corner that is already surrounded by platted properties. All of the "D" areas are either vested plats or have already been developed. Exhibit C, designation"A" stands for an added parcel that currently has the manufactured mobile home park of Soos Creek Estates on it, and is partly in the flood zone attached to / Big Soos Creek. The mobile home park is grandfathered,but should any future development occur, it would be subject to the Urban Separator designation. In Exhibit B, the "D" area is currently developed as a plat and is an extension of Ridgefield Estates. Planning Committee Minutes, 1/8/01 Page 2 Those are the areas mapwise that the Land Use and Planning Board recommended for addition or deletion. The other areas would be maintained as Urban Separator as originally designated by King County, including any areas in Kent's potential annexation area. Ms. Anderson reviewed Policies LU-20.1 through LU-20.8, which are the goals and policies for Urban Separators that the Land Use and Planning Board recommended to be placed in the Comprehensive Plan. LU-20.2 was amended by the Land Use and Planning Board from the staff recommendation of 5-year updates to not allow amendments to the Urban Separators except at the end of the 20 year period granted by the Growth Management Act for review of Comp Plans. That would put Kent in compliance with other adjacent jurisdictions in King County, and Kent could update its plan at the same time those jurisdictions would update their plans. The first review would be in 2012. Page 10, Zoning Code Amendments, looks at clustering, which would require zoning code and subdivision code amendments. It was originally assumed that the Urban Separators would all be designated SR-1 and that within the SR-1 lands there could be clustered subdivisions. 50% of a particular parcel would automatically be placed in an open space area most adjacent to the critical areas in an Urban Separator. Within the remaining 50% of the land, lot sizes could go down to 2,500 square feet and flexibility would be allowed for a clustered subdivision to provide the developer with as much density as would have been provided under SR-1, despite sensitive areas and open space requirements. Page 11 continues with the Zoning Code Amendment proposing that the "subdivision action shall be clustered in groups not exceeding 8 units. There may be more than one cluster per project. Separation between cluster groups shall be a minimum of 120 feet. " Those specifications are consistent with what's allowed now in King County rural areas for clustering, which requires clustering in the one unit per acre designation Urban Separator. The Subdivision Code Amendments reiterate the same requirements. One key difference in the staff report's Location criteria and the recommendation of the Land Use &Planning Board is that the Board recommended that the zoning not change in the mapped areas for Urban Separators. The staff criteria says "The cluster residential development option shall be permitted only in the SR-1 zoning district..." The staff report was written before it was known that the LUPB wanted to keep the existing zoning, so it was assumed that only SR-1 would be in the Urban Separator area. Some clarification may be needed with the clustering issue as the Comp Plan is at SR-1 density but the zoning is greater. The perceived intent of the Land Use and Planning Board recommendation was to apply clustering to all of the Urban Separator areas,but the way it was written it is applied only to the SR-1 areas. Tom Brotherton asked what the implications would be of having SR-1 in the Comp Plan and other SR zone designations in the actual zoning. Charlene Anderson said the Growth Management Act requires consistency, and having a one unit per acre designation on the Comp Plan but a higher zoning was not consistent. Fred Satterstrom commented that over half of the area designated Urban Separator was retained in a low density zoning by �'! Planning Committee Minutes, 1/8/01 Page 3 the City after annexation,however there were cases where properties that were further away from the creek were evaluated, property by property, and given a higher density zoning through the annexation zoning process. The City's evaluation took into consideration environmental constraints, the location of the property near utilities, how , ready it was for development, and how constrained the area was. Much of that area along the creek still remains in a low density designation,but substantial portions of the Urban Separator are designated over one unit per acre and some properties go as high as six units per acre as a consequence of the evaluation. Ms. Anderson explained that she had forgotten to do the deletions and additions on the map and the original King County map designations were represented with City of Kent zoning. Zoning Map 1 shows a large part zoned SR-4.5, which continues into the Ridgefield area and the property west of that. Further toward the creek, the land is zoned SR-1, and that would stay SR-1 per the Land Use and Planning Board recommendation. On Map 2, added property to the east of Lake Meridian is designated as MHP. The rest of the properties to the north and south are zoned SR-1 until just north of SR18 and to the west of Soos Creek where there is some SR-3 density area. That was recommended by the Land Use and Planning Board to stay at SR-3 with an Urban Separator designation. Zoning Map 3 shows areas zoned SR-6, SR-3, and SR-1. A SR-4.5 area is proposed for deletion. Tom Brotherton said he was confused by the designation of low density when all the zones were a higher number. Ms. Anderson said the King County policy stipulated Urban Separators as low density areas set at one unit per acre. Council can either accept or reject that policy. The Law Department memo from the Growth Management Hearing Board and case law shows there have been four unit per acre designations for compact urban development, so low density may be defined as lower than four units per acre. The areas with vested applications would stay at their current zoning designations and are shown as "D" on the Exhibit maps. Judy Woods moved to approve the Land Use and Planning Board's recommendations for text and map amendments as presented in the Planning Services Division Staff Report dated September 25, 2000 under Option 2B. This motion includes proposed text amendments to the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan and proposed text amendments to the Zoning and Subdivision Codes. Option 213 includes all properties designated on Map Exhibit "A" entitled "Kent Vicinity Urban Separators" with the additions and deletions of properties as shown on Map Exhibits "B", "C", and "D". The motion includes an amendment whereby there would be no rezoning of properties presently zoned higher than SR-1 within the Urban Separator. This motion includes a text amendment under Goals and Policies LU-20.2 to delete the existing text and replace it with the following: Allow amendments to the Urban Separators only at the end of the 20 years to coincide with King County 1994 Policy Update of the Comprehensive Plan or by Kent City Council initiation because of pending danger or public safety. The motion was seconded by Tim Clark. i" Planning Committee Minutes, 1/8/01 Page 4 Tim Clark offered a friendly amendment to specify the year 2012 as the year to allow amendments to the Urban Separator policy under the 20 year period. Mr. Clark made a second amendment to make the Cairnes property consistent with the density of its surrounding neighborhoods. The amendments were accepted by Judy Woods. Ms. Woods suggested making the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map consistent at SR-1 even though that would be in conflict with the Land Use and Planning Board's recommendation. Tim Clark and Tom Brotherton both concurred. Mr. Brotherton mentioned properties along 240ei that he would like to exclude from the Urban Separator area. The properties are situated on the far side of the ridge line from Soos Creek and drain to the west, not east towards Soos Creek. Based on the City's testing, those properties do not belong in the Urban Separator as they are surrounded on three sides by high density development and are served by utilities. Tim Clark moved to delete those properties on Zoning Map 1 to the west of the ridge line, thereby not draining into the Soos Creek area, as properties to be dropped, and to leave it to staff for analysis of what is appropriate. Judy Woods seconded the motion. Fred Satterstrom said that analysis would come back at the time the issue goes to the full Council. Tom Brotherton expressed that he was concerned that the issue of clustering was not clear since the motion from the Land Use &Planning Board indicated clustering would be in SR-1 areas only but recommends leaving the areas that are not SR-1 as they are. --,` Clustering could be interpreted as only being applied to those areas that are currently SR- 1. Mr. Brotherton stated it should be applied to all the properties within the Urban Separator. Charlene Anderson said the policy would only need a change if the existing zoning of SR-3 and SR-6 were kept. Deputy City Attorney Tom Brubaker pointed out that King County's Countywide Planning Policies were not regulations, mandates, or comprehensive plan issues,but a planning document. Those policies created the Urban Separator designation that was zoned low density/one unit per acre before the area was annexed to the City. The policy was passed by King County and endorsed by the City of Kent. The actual zoning designation was not part of the policy. The City has the authority under the law to amend the King County Urban Separator map and density and make it fit what is appropriate for the City. However, a density standard needs to be identified that can be uniformly applied so the Comprehensive Plan is consistent with the zoning designation. A case at the Growth Management Hearings Board said minimum density would be four units per acre for compact urban development. It would not be inconsistent with the Urban Separator designation to say minimum density would be four units per acre or less, however it could not be higher than that. The same case also says density of one unit for every 2%z acres is urban in nature. Charlene Anderson clarified that the SR-6 areas in the Urban Separator designation would be rezoned to SR-1 according to the current proposal. Those areas that have -� Planning Committee Minutes, 1/8/01 Page 5 vested applications would be deleted entirely from the Urban Separator designation so the issue of zoning would be nonexistent. Tom Brubaker questioned if all the properties currently marked SR-3, SR-6, and SR-4.5 would all go down to SR-1. Tom Brotherton said they would in the Urban Separators. Fred Satterstrom asked for further clarification on whether the Cairnes property should be made consistent with its neighbors, which are zoned SR-2. Tom Brotherton commented that since the density was already built up at SR-2 in that particular area, it would be appropriate for the Cannes property to be designated SR-2 density. Fred Satterstrom said that, based on the motion, the property would show up as SF-1 if it remained in the Urban Separator.• The motion could direct staff to change it to SR-2. Tom Brotherton suggested removing the Cairnes property from the Urban Separator. The meeting was opened for citizen comments: Don Clasen, 13602 SE 282"d Street, said the Urban Separator could have a drastic effect on his property if the proposed action was taken. It is totally inconsistent with results of the exhaustive public hearing process which came down to the single focal issue of not trampling on or taking away the property rights of property owners in the City. The Land Use and Planning Board considered all the issues,but the focus of the discussion of the Board's decision and recommendation was the single issue of damage and adverse impact that down-zoning would have on property owners. As a result of the input and testimony of the citizens, the Board unanimously recommended a policy that encompasses the County's Urban Separator goals and their achievement without drastically harming the citizens. The policy recommended by the Board ensures and strengthens the achievement of county Urban Separator goals, which are already achievable under existing City ordinances. Tom Brotherton asked Mr. Clasen if his property was zoned one unit per acre when it was in the county. Mr. Clasen said the area was zoned R-3 to R-4.5 and the zoning went up and down. Notification never came from the City that the property had been down- zoned, and it had never been zoned R-1. Mr. Brotherton asked Mr. Clasen if he knew about the Urban Separator and its one unit per acre designation. Don Clasen said he knew nothing about Urban Separators until the policy process started in September. He went through two rezoning applications with the City, and the City did not mention Urban Separators, nor had the county. Mr. Clasen said he and his wife have a large parcel of land zoned now at R-6. Mr. Clasen implored the Committee to not impact people by taking away their property rights and retirements, and to enact a policy that was fair and equitable to the citizens of the City. He said a few people should not be made to pay for achieving visual vistas, recreation,parks, etc., and contended that the Friends of Soos Creek and other citizens would not want him and other affected people to pay for those kinds of things without compensation. He urged the Committee to respect the public hearing process and the recommendation of the Board, and to do what was right. The properties do not have to be down-zoned in order to achieve the goals of the Urban Separators. Planning Committee Minutes, 1/8/01 Page 6 Bill H. Williamson spoke on behalf of the Pfaff property,pointing the property out on Zoning Map 3. Tom Brotherton clarified for Mr. Williamson that that particular property had been taken out of the Urban Separators. Joe Miles, Friends of Soos Creek Park, expressed concern with the motion in regards to the Caimes amendment. He pointed out the Caiarnes property on Exhibit C, and said he strongly feels that the amendment is inconsistent with the intent and spirit of the Urban Separator policy. The Caimes property is about one acre in size, consistent with the size of the surrounding parcels. The three homes immediately to the west are all located next to the street. The Caimes property is right next to the right of way line for the trail and if it is divided up, there will be high density right next to the trail. Tom Brotherton reminded Mr. Miles that the "high"density would be only two units per acre. Joe Miles continued that going over one unit per acre would be completely inconsistent with the entire spirit of the Urban Separator policy under the argument that the surrounding neighborhood was higher density. The existing homes nearby are all located by the street, not by the trail. He urged rejection of the amendment. Tom Sharp, 24254 143`d Ave. SE, Kent, presented a handout concerning his property on 240`h Street. He said he did understand that his property had been deleted from the Urban Separator,but could not understand why it had been a part and why he had not known about it. Mr. Sharp handed out materials from has attorney, Keith Dearborn, that included more information going back to the 1991 Soos Creek Basin Plan and Soos Creek Community Plan. Tom Brotherton spoke to his concern about the possibility of damage to an individual property and the fact that the City's recommended policy could be causing more impact to people than the county's policy. He stated he was surprised that Mr. Clasen's property had not been zoned SR-1 by the county. Fred S4tterstrom interjected that he did not think Mr. Clasen's statement was correct about the zoning on his property, but would be willing to research the issue. All of the evidence thus far suggests that the property in question was either zoned one acre or lower density. The zoning in King County did bounce back and forth and shortly before annexation of Meridian, the county had an interim zoning of GR-2.5 which meant one unit per 2 %: acres. That was rezoned just prior to annexation into the City of Kent. The motion was voted on as amended and passed 3-0. The meeting was adjourned at 5:04 PM. Jackie Bicknell City Council Secretary PLANNING COMMITTEE MINUTES FEBRUARY 5, 2001 COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Tom Brotherton, Judy Woods, Tim Clark STAFF PRESENT: Fred Satterstrom, Charlene Anderson, Mike Martin, Roger Lubovich,Jackie Bicknell PUBLIC PRESENT: Lloyd F. Weller, Betty Coblentz, Mike Coblentz, Gavin Miles, Geraldine Miles, Rita Bailie, Carl Bloom, Ken Koss, Alan Stuckey, Bob Nelson, Huy H. Nguyen, Barbara Clasen, Donald Clasen,Dan Moberly, Joe Miles, Don Shaffer, Louise Lee, Eric Wells, Gary Young The meeting was called to order by Chair Tom Brotherton at 4:03 PM. Approval of Minutes of January 8, 2001 Committee Member Judy Woods moved to approve the minutes of January 8, 2001. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Tim Clark and passed 3-0.. Year 2000 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Senior Planner Charlene Anderson said seven Comp Plan Amendments had been received. Two applications were withdrawn, and out of the five left, three were comp plan and zoning code amendments and two were capital facilities plan amendments. Ms. Anderson described the �. amendments: ■ Proposal A: Kentview Pod H is a mixture of AG and SR-3 zoning. The proposal is for SR- 4.5 which is a revision from the original application of a proposed 6 units per acre, along with a similar comp plan designation. Staff and the Land Use and Planning Board both recommend denial of the request pending a study of the Agricultural Lands and the Kentview project. The Agricultural Lands Policy will go to a Land Use and.Planning Board workshop in March with a hearing in April. Ms. Anderson made reference to a letter Polygon had distributed to Committee members at that day's meeting detailing their proposal, and mentioned that a copy of a site plan was attached to the letter. Ms. Anderson said a comp plan and zoning amendment were not related to the site plan itself. • Proposal B, the Nguyen comp plan amendment, is for property located off of Kent-Kangley Road in Low Density Multi Family and MRG zoning. The lot has an existing house that would be used for a beauty salon. Staff and the Board recommend approval of the amendment. ■ Proposal C: the Coblentz property is a mixture of CM-1 (Commercial Manufacturing 1) located along SR167, and some SR-6 zoning in the back. The proposal is to designate the area multi family, and the Board and staff recommend that the Comp Plan be Low Density Multi Family and the zoning SR-8. SR-8 zoning would allow an amendment in the future for either multi family zoning or townhouse zoning MRT. i- Planning Committee,2/5/01 2 ■ Proposal F, Capital Facilities Plans: the Board typically holds a public hearing but doesn't make a recommendation on Capital Facilities Plans, leaving the flexibility of a decision up to the City Council. Each year the Kent and Federal Way School Districts have to submit a Capital Facilities Plan designating what their current inventory is, what the projected enrollment is, and what the construction needs are so impact fees can be established. ■ Proposal G: the Capital Facilities Plan for the City of Kent was included in the budget that was passed in December, but the actual official approval is not completed until a public hearing process is done with the Board and the Plan is then passed on to the Council. Judy Woods moved to approve Proposals B, F, and G. The motion was seconded by Tim Clark and passed 3-0. Tim Clark remarked that staff s presentation had pointed out advantages in regards to the Coblentz property of adopting the designation of Low Density Multi Family on the Comp Plan map and Single Family 8 units per acre (or SR-8) on the zone map. Tom Brotherton said he was in favor of preserving the townhouse option. Mr. Clark moved approval of the land use designation to Low Density Multi Family and Single Family SR-8 on the zoning map for the Coblentz property. The motion was seconded by Judy Woods and passed 3-0. Tom Brotherton said the Land Use and Planning Board had unanimously recommended denial of the Pod H request and staff had concurred with the recommendation. Tim Clark moved to recommend denial of the Pod H recommendation. The motion was seconded by Judy Woods. In further discussion, Tim Clark said that lack of available land space for the school district, particularly on the valley floor, had been a problem for some time. Although Polygon has made every effort to accommodate the City's Master Plan in that particular area by establishing housing that would meet a variety of needs with a combination of apartments, condominiums, single family residences, and townhouses, the lovely planned community still adds 700 units of housing and presents the problem of dealing with a variety of needs such as access to shopping and the establishment of a public school to service that size of community. Polygon has a valid complaint in that the school district did not move forward aggressively, and after renovating the land, Polygon is trying to get some return on their money. However, if the request is approved, it would put a stress on the infrastructure on the valley floor to which there is no solution. Judy Woods stated that she values what Polygon has contributed to the community, and the City has had a very good working relationship with them. She noted, however, that she didn't feel comfortable going ahead until the Agricultural Lands Policy had been examined and the Land Use and Planning Board had made a recommendation on that policy. The Land Use and Planning Board voted strongly to deny the Pod H request after spending a lot of time in public hearing on the issue. Ms. Wood stated she was troubled that the City had given a fill permit for the land prior to working out all the details as to whether the school district would want to use the property or to see what other kinds of uses there might be for the property. "1 Planning Committee,2/5/O1 3 Tom Brotherton pointed out that Polygon had been very responsive to the neighbor's complaints about visual pollution, had reduced the number of lots and eliminated access onto Frager Road, and had put in berms and plantings around the periphery of the development to minimize the impact. Mr. Brotherton said he would favor the amendment except for the AG Lands Policy. Eric Wells, Polygon Northwest Company, summarized the letter he had earlier presented to the Committee which outlined the conditions that had changed since the initial application went before the Land Use and Planning Board and was subsequently denied. The site, which has split zoning, is unique and unlike any other land in the City of Kent that has straight agricultural zoning. It is inside an approved PUD and Master Planned Community, which also makes it a unique piece rather than just AG land. The City did grant the fill and grade permit under the intention that Council had approved the site for development, whether for a school site or something else. Since there are less than 8 acres of buildable land and because of the geometry, it does not appear that the land would be suitable for a school site, however Polygon would continue to work with the school district if the school district should decide the site would work. Nevertheless, if the school district goes away, Polygon doesn't want to be penalized by having to go back through the process and thus incur additional time delays. A whole building season could be lost. Polygon proposes to move forward with an additional buffer of almost an acre of land,which combined with the BMX Park (given to the Parks Committee last month), provides almost 1% acres along Frager Road and preserves the recreational corridor there. The different changes over the last month has allowed Polygon's request to be a little different application than what originally went before the Board, but with lowering the density, providing buffers, meeting with the neighbors, the school district's having taken a position that the site may not fit a school facility, and providing additional parks along the Green River, Polygon had hoped this would be an application that would receive the Committee's and Council's support at this time rather than to have additional delays. Mr. Wells said that because of the uniqueness of the property and it's being in a Master Plan and having split zoning, it did not really fit in with the AG Policy and wasn't productive AG land. City Attorney Roger Lubovich commented that a modified presentation at the Committee level was a problem as the concept or information was a new addition to what was presented to the Land Use & Planning Board. Acting on the new information would be inappropriate without going back to a hearing process so other people would have an opportunity to discuss it. The Committee could change its recommendations based on the existing information, but not if information was added after the hearing and other people had not had an opportunity to discuss the new options. Eric Wells said Polygon had listened to the input from the public hearing process and modified the Pod H plan according to that input. Tom Brotherton stated that the description and parameters of the land had not changed,but Polygon's had adapted their proposal to better fit the concerns of the neighbors and the environment of the land by adding buffers, reducing the density, and changing the access so it didn't come out on Frager Road. The original request was to rezone the land so they could build houses and that is still the same concept. Fred Satterstrom said the Land Use and Planning Board did not consider a specific site plan, and the question is whether or not the property would Planning Committee,2/5/01 4 be an agricultural piece of land or a residential piece of land. The site plan is a conceptual drawing and useful information but not necessarily relevant to a policy level decision because it's not about a contract rezone. There would be no requirement that Polygon build pursuant to the site plan. The proposal changed in terms of density after the Land Use and Planning Board had reviewed the matter, listened to public testimony and then forwarded their recommendation to committee. Polygon has modified their proposal downward to a lesser density from SR-6 to SR-4.5, and may also be representing a viewpoint of the school district that could be different from what the Land Use and Planning Board had considered. Tom Brotherton asked if the Pod H application could be tabled until after the Agricultural Policy discussion. Roger Lubovich said a recommendation could be made to the Council to table the matter without remanding it back to the Land Use & ',Planning Board. Tim Clark retracted his former motion. He moved to table the Pod H application until there was further information on the AG Land. The motion was seconded by Judy Woods and passed 3-0. Urban Separator Framework Policy Judy Woods moved to reconsider the January 18, 2001 Planning Committee recommendation on Urban Separator Framework Policy, #CPA-2000-1. The motion was seconded by Tim Clark and passed 3-0. The meeting adjourned at 4:30 PM. Jackie Bicknell City Council Secretary SPECIAL PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE MINUTES JANUARY 22, 2001 COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Tim Clark, Connie Epperly, Rico Yingling STAFF PRESENT: Don Wickstrom, Brett Vinson, Steve Mullen, Mike Martin, Jim Storment, Cyndi Wilbur, Gary Gill, Tim LaPorte, Jackie Bicknell PUBLIC PRESENT: Aaron Deming, Jason Call, Rod Call, Greta Pfaff, S. Robert Pfaff The meeting was called to order by Chair Tim Clark at 5:04 PM. Interlocal Agreement for Sanitary Sewer Service was added to the agenda as item number 5. Approval of Minutes of January 8, 2001 Committee Member Rico Yingling moved to approve the minutes of January 8, 2001. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Connie Epperly and passed 3-0. Interagency Agreement between Auburn/Kent—2771h Street . Public Works Director Don Wickstrom said the Auburn/Kent 277`h Street Interagency Agreement involves a Metro sewer project and road construction. The granting agencies asked Kent to help Auburn complete the project, and the agreement between the two cities is for Kent to do all of the construction management. Kent received a$1.9 million grant to help reduce a financial shortfall of almost $5 million, and staff will go before the Transportation Improvement Board to ask for a $2.2 million design modifications increase to the existing grant. If the increase is received, the project would be financially covered. The East Hill Sewer Interceptor was built by Kent from the top of 277`h down to Central Avenue/Auburn Way North, but a gap remains in the line between Auburn Way North and the Valley Freeway. Metro will replace the temporary, interim solution with a permanent line and wants Kent to do the construction management for the sewer project in conjunction with the road proj ect. Rico Yingling asked what the limit of Kent's liability would be if a mistake were made. Design Engineer Manager Tim LaPorte said Auburn's intention was to hold Kent harmless from any damages that would come as a result of building Auburn's design. Auburn would have to prove negligence on Kent's part to claim a liability against Kent. Tim Clark asked what the timeline was for the road to be closed and traffic shifted to a detour. Mr. LaPorte said the date for the road closure was estimated to be near the end of May or the beginning of June, 2001. The road would be closed for approximately 22 months for the Auburn _ project, which does not include King County's part. The project has been coordinated with King County and Auburn so that the sewer line would be built concurrent with the road work. Mr. Clark questioned whether there might be a way to create a temporary one-way path through the i-- area to handle rush hour traffic or to construct an alternative route that would create a connection between West Valley and Auburn Way North. Tim LaPorte said Kent had worked with Auburn Public Works Minutes, 1/22/01 Page 2 of 3 and King County staff to come up with interim detours for the residents and businesses along 72nd and 78`h Avenues that would be virtually landlocked. However, because there would be 30 feet of fill on either side of both railroad tracks (four approaches for two bridges), it would be impossible to maintain traffic in any way other than the detour route via 371h Street in Auburn. Tim Clark questioned if the two roads that ran along the edge of the Green River could be taken advantage of to get some one-way relief. Tim LaPorte said 262"d, on the south side of the Green River, could be used for vehicles but has a 10 foot maximum clearance height where it passes underneath the railroad and couldn't be used for trucks. Mr. Clark asked that the street be investigated as an alternative route. Connie Epperly recommended authorizing the Mayor to sign the Interagency Agreement with the City of Auburn regarding the 272"d/2771h Street Corridor project upon the City Attorney and the Public Works Director's concurring the final language therein. The motion was seconded by Rico Yingling. Connie Epperly added a friendly amendment to accept the Mill Creek Relief System Agreement between the City of Kent and King County. Rico Yingling accepted the amendment. The motion was voted on and passed 3-0. WSDOT Grant—2000 Traffic Safetv Near Schools Program Don Wickstrom said the City applied for a Traffic Safety Near Schools grant for$120,000 to improve 2481h Street from 941h to Benson. A grant for$82,800 was received,plus there was a 6%participation received from the state and the school district. The matching money will come from street vacations. In describing the construction work, Mr. Wickstrom said the project would widen 2481h Street going east from 94`h, and add a widened shoulder on one side. Right now there are ditches within a couple feet of the edge of the pavement. Rico Yingling recommended authorizing the Mayor to sign the WSDOT Grant Traffic Safety Near Schools Program agreement, direct staff to accept the grant and establish a budget for same. The motion was seconded by Connie Epperly and passed 3-0. South 196`h/20011 Corridor—West Leg King County Right of Way Transfer Don Wickstrom said the 1961h Street Corridor had two phases: the west leg and the middle phase. The west phase had two parts of construction—Kent's part, from half way in the middle of the river to West Valley Highway, and the county's part, from the Green River to Orillia Road. Kent was lead agency for the county and acquired all of the right of way and more than three acres of mitigation site. Now that the project is complete, it is time to turn the right of way and property over to the county for operation and maintenance of the road. Council has to authorize a transfer from Kent's name to the county's name. Connie Epperly recommended Council authorizing the Public Works Director to transfer the property and right of way to King County as related to their portion of the 196`h/20Wh Street Corridor Project. The motion was seconded by Rico Yingling and passed 3-0. Interlocal Agreement for Sanitary Sewer Service Don Wickstrom said that Schneider Homes was developing condos on land at the corner of 132d and 282"d streets across from Reber Ranch. The bulk of the property is wetlands and is in .� Auburn's sewer service area, however Auburn has no sewers on that side of the river that could Public Works Minutes, 1/22/01 Page 3 of 3 �—, service the property. Kent has gravity sewers abutting the property, and the agreement would allow Kent to service the area. Rico Yingling recommended Council authorization for the Mayor to complete negotiations and execute an Interlocal Agreement in a form approved by the Public Works Director and the City Attorney for sanitary sewer service with the City of Auburn. The motion was seconded by Connie Epperly. In further discussion, Rico Yingling questioned how the agreement would work. Assistant City Attorney Brett Vinson read from paragraph 3b of the agreement that states "the rates charged to the sanitary sewer customer by Kent within the area described in the Exhibit "A"shall be fixed, altered, regulated and controlled by Kent." Mr. Yingling asked who would pay the capital costs of the sewer installation. Don Wickstrom said the developer would pay the costs, but Kent does have an undersized line leading to the area which would eventually have to be replaced. The developer would pay a proportionate share of that replacement line. The motion was voted on and passed 3-0. The meeting was adjourned at 5:28 PM. Jackie Bicknell City Council Secretary PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE MINUTES FEBRUARY 5, 2001 COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Tim Clark, Connie Epperly, Rico Yingling STAFF PRESENT: Don Wickstrom, Cyndi Wilbur, Tom Brubaker, Gary Gill, Jackie Bicknell PUBLIC PRESENT: Elsy Rust, Jim Rust The meeting was called to order by Chair Tim Clark at 5:06 PM. Mr. Clark corrected a misprint on the agenda that called the meeting a special meeting. He said the second meeting in February would be held on Tuesday, February 27, 2001 at 5:00 PM because of a holiday on February 19`h. One item was added to the agenda: Surplus Former Traffic Operations Building. Approval of Minutes of January 22, 2001 Committee Member Connie Epperly moved to approve the minutes of January 22, 2001. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Rico Yingling and passed 3-0. South King Countv Regional Water Association Agreement Public Works Director Don Wickstrom said the City belongs to the South King County Regional Water Association which involves the majority of the surrounding districts and cities. The .— agreement was authorized and executed in 1996, and the current modifications clarify issues that have come up over the years, such as whether a signatory utility that's not a current member would still be entitled to be reimbursed or to participate in the agreement. The agreement has been amended to reflect that membership must be current and dues paid to get reimbursed for the cost of the original agreement and to receive the benefits of the agreement. Rico Yingling moved to recommend authorization for the Mayor to sign a South King County Regional Water Association Joint Operating Agreement upon concurrence of the language therein by the City Attorney and the Public Works Director and also, authorize that the representative is the Public Works Director with the alternate being the Water Superintendent. The motion was seconded by Connie Epperly and passed 3-0. Citv of Tukwila 1801h Street Protect Don Wickstrom said the City of Tukwila is constructing the 1 SO`h Street grade separator project at the railroad crossing, and needs a piece of right of way that belongs to Kent to provide access to an existing development. They have estimated that the property is worth about$1,000 and have asked that Kent donate it to the project fund through a quit claim deed by the City. Tukwila had purchased a piece of property on the Interurban trail that's in the City of Kent and once the project is done, they will deed the property to Kent as an exchange. Deputy City Attorney Tom Brubaker clarified that giving away property could be in violation of the State Constitution so the language would need to specifically say there would be an exchange of land to be legitimate. Public Works Committee,2/5/01 2 Connie Epperly moved to recommend Council authorization, subject to review by the Public Works Director and the City Attorney, to quit claim deed to Tukwila the open space property as referred to in the attached map for the 1801h Street project. The motion was seconded by Rico Yingling and passed 3-0. Surplus Former Traffic Operations Building Don Wickstrom said when the 1961h Street Corridor project is done, there will be a continuos link from 180`h to 1961h with a signal at 196`h Street. The City bought property about 10 years ago, north of 196`h and just west of the Interurban Trail, so it wouldn't develop. The City has used a metal, Butler, 8,000 square foot building on the property for a traffic operations building, but has now moved out to allow the building to be demolished or moved in order to build 72°d through the property. The City looked at relocating the building, but bringing it up to code would be extensive. A property owner next door is willing to move the building to his property at no cost to the City, and the City is asking to surplus the building as it would cost approximately$20,000 to remove and/or demolish it. Rico Yingling moved to recommend surplusing the former traffic operations building, subject to approval by the City Attorney and the Public Works Director, for property located at 72nd and 1961h. The motion was seconded by Connie Epperly and passed 3-0. The meeting was adjourned at 5:23 PM. Jackie Bicknell City Council Secretary CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS A. r EXECUTIVE SESSION A) Pending and Potential Litigation