Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Meeting - Council - Agenda - 01/16/2001 Cotyof Kent Cmity Council Meeting Agenda KENT W A S H I N G T O N Mayor Jim White Councilmembers Leona Orr, President Sandy Amodt Connie Epperly Tom Brotherton Judy Woods Tim Clark Rico Yingling January 16, 2001 Office of the City Clerk SUMMARY AGENDA KENT CITY COUNCIL MEETING KEN O T January 16, 2001 WASHINGTON Council Chambers - 7 : 00 p.m. MAYOR: Jim White COUNCILMEMBERS : Leona Orr, President Sandy Amodt Tom Brotherton Tim Clark Connie Epperly Judy Woods Rico Yingling 1 . CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE 2 . ROLL CALL 3 . CHANGES TO AGENDA A. FROM COUNCIL, ADMINISTRATION, OR STAFF B. FROM THE PUBLIC 4 . PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS A. Mayor' s State of the City Address 6. Proc/afnedi" - I oas4ynasfc WeeK S . PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Street Vacation, Portion of 155th Avenue S .E. , Generally Known as 154th Avenue S .E. 6 . CONSENT CALENDAR A. Minutes - Approval B. Bills - Approval C. Kent Arts Commission 2001 City Art Plan and Five-Year City Art Plan - Accept and Budget --oD IAC Youth Athletic Facilities Grant - Accept and Budget E. LID 354, Washington Ave HOV Lanes and Meeker Street Widening Improvement - Ordinance 3 540 F. Bower Short Plat Bill of Sale - Accept G. Woodridge Estates Bill of Sale - Accept H. Wilson Apartments Bill of Sale - Accept I . Highridge Townhomes Bill of Sale - Accept J. Harrell Short Plat Bill of Sale - Accept K. Tacoma Screw Products Bill of Sale - Accept L. Central Commerce Building Phase I (A & B) Bill of Sale - Accept M. Stonegate Knolls/Highland Crossing Bill of Sale - Accept N. Winward Cove at The lakes Bill of Sale - Accept 0. Bayberry Crest Bill of Sale - Accept P Benson Highlands Bill of Sale - Accept Q. 118th Avenue SE Sanitary Sewer Extension Charge in Lieu of Assessment - Authorize R. Vehicular Speed Limits Resolution - Pass jr 92 S . S. 196th Street/Russell Road Improvements - Accept as Complete (continued next page) SUMMARY AGENDA CONTINUED T. Coordinated Prevention Grant No. G0000139, Amendment No. 1 - Accept U. VoiceStream Lease Agreement - Authorize 7 . OTHER BUSINESS Kent Retail Center Rezone ` 0 2000 Comprehensive Plan Amendments 8 . BIIIDS None 9 . REPORTS FROM STANDING COMMITTEES AND STAFF 10 . REPORTS FROM SPECIAL COMMITTEES 11 . CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS 12 EXECUTIVE SESSION None 13 . ADJOURNMENT NOTE : A copy of the full agenda packet is available for perusal in the City Clerk' s Office and the Kent Library. An explanation of the agenda format is given on the back of this page. Any person requiring a disability accommodation should contact the City Clerk' s Office in advance at (253) 856-5725 . For TDD relay service call the Washington Telecommunications Relay Service at 1-800-833-6388 . CHANGES TO THE AGENDA Citizens wishing to address the Council will , at this time, make known the subject of interest, so all may be properly heard. A) FROM COUNCIL, ADMINISTRATION, OR STAFF B) FROM THE PUBLIC PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS A) MAYOR' S STATE OF THE CITY ADDRESS Kent City Council Meeting Date_ January 16 , 2001 Category Public Hearings 1 . SUBJECT: STREET VACATION, PORTION OF 155TH AVENUE S .E . , GENERALLY KNOWN AS 154TH AVE S .E . - STV-2000-2 (KIVA 42003931) 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Resolution No. 1580 established January 16, 2001, as the public hearing date for the applica- tion by DFM, LLC, to vacate a portion of 155th Avenue Southeast , generally known as 154th Avenue SE. A staff report recommending approval with conditions is included in the Council ' s packet . 3 . EXHIBITS: Staff Report and map 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: staff (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc . ) 5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS : 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: A. Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds to close the public hearing. B. Councilmember moves, Councilmember 11AA,/ seconds to approve/4i- �^� ' the staff ' s recommendation of approval with conditions of the application to vacate a portion of 155th Avenue Southeast, generally known as 154th Avenue SE, as referenced in Resolution No. 1580, and to direct the City Attorney to prepare the necessary ordinance upon compliance with the conditions of approval . DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 5A • KENT MEMORANDUM WASHINGTON January 9, 2001 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING SERVICES MEMO TO: MAYOR JIM WHITE AND Fred N. Satterstrom,AICP CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS Manager Mailing Address: FROM: FRED N. SATTERSTROM, 220 Fourth Ave. S. PLANNING MANAGER Kent,WA 98032-5895 RE: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON AN Location dress: 400 Westst Gowe APPLICATION TO VACATE PORTIONS OF Kent,WA 98032 155TH AVENUE S.E. Phone:253-856-5454 #STV-2000-2 (KIVA#2003931) Fax:253-856-6454 HEARING DATE: January 16, 2001, Council Chambers East RECOMMENDATION: APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS I. Name of Applicant DFM, LLC 14326 SE 243`d St. Kent, WA 98042 I1. Reason for Requesting Street Vacation The applicant states the reason for the street vacation is to seek alignment of the residential road system with the varied zoning in the vicinity. The parcels along SE 272nd Street are zoned commercial and the parcels to the south are zoned residential. Development review of the commercial projects has precluded the use of the residential access street (1541h Avenue SE). The proposed vacation will terminate the residential access street at the point where residential access is last required and create the desired buffering from the commercial activities to the north. The vacated area is to be incorporated into the proposed binding site plan for the Soos Creek Center Project (building applications #2000581 and #2000583). Additional ROW is proposed to be dedicated to relocate the cul-de-sac to the southerly termination of the roadway, (as depicted on the attached site map). Mayor Jim White and City Council Members Page 2 January 9, 2001 III. Backeround 1551h Avenue SE is a long, cul-de-sac street which extends northward from SE 274`h Street and gives access to several residential lots on both sides. (It should be noted that City maps will identify this street as 154`h Avenue SE, but owing to the original plat where this street was created, the legal description refers to 1551h Avenue SE. Therefore, throughout this staff report, the proposed street will be identified as 155`h Avenue SE). The cul-de-sac extends north to commercially- zoned properties which abut SE 272°d Street and provides access to these lots from and through the residential area. The proposed street vacation would shorten the length of the cul-de-sac by approximately 95-feet and continue to provide access to abutting residential properties. Commercial development of frontage properties along SE 272❑d Street will obtain access from said street and the additional ROW may be utilized for private development. IV. Staff Recommendation: After reviewing comments from the following departments and agencies: ■ Public Works ■ Police ■ Parks ■ Fire ■ Puget Sound Energy ■ U.S. West And conducting our own review, the Planning Services Division recommends that the request to vacate portions of 1541h Avenue SE as described in Resolution #1580 and shown on the accompanying map, be APPROVED with the following conditions: 1. The petitioner shall deed to the City that additional property at a location approved by the Public Works Director for a new cul-de-sac turnaround area. Said additional property shall be at least equivalent to that right-of-way that presently exists for 1551h Avenue SE turnaround area. Mayor Jim White and City Council Members Page 2 January 9, 2001 2. The City shall be compensated for the value of the right-of-way proposed to be vacated in accordance with state law. In determining that value, the area of the additionally deeded property shall be subtracted from the area of the right-of-way being vacated on a square foot to square to foot basis with the resulting net area then being that area for which compensation is determined. 3. The petitioner shall construct a cul-de-sac turnaround area within the new cul-de-sac turnaround area to the satisfaction and approval of the Public Works Director. Said cul-de-sac turnaround area shall be equal to or better than the existing cul-de-sac area. 4. Where public and/or private utilities and/or facilities presently exist within the right-of-way proposed to be vacated, the City shall retain utility easement rights for its utilities and/or facilities along with the right to grant to others similar rights for their utilities and/or facilities. 5. Funds received from this proposed vacation shall be deposited in the City's School Pedestrian Walkway Improvement Fund (R36) to be used accordingly. F S\cb\P:admi n\sry 20002.doc j� W. L!N£, L 0 T 5 B W. LINE Or PLA TIED / 9,U8DIN5/0N Or EDWALL A RASK ADD177ON EXHIBIT "B" / 71) PROPOSVACAIEO A PORAON OF INE EDWALL A. RASK A00f710N RICHT-Ar-WAY LOT5 KINC COUNTY, WASHINGTON L� LOCAIFO IN 7HE NE 114 OF THE NW 114 OF S£C17ON 35, TV 22 N, R. 5 £, W.M. $ PROPOSED ADD1710NAL KING COUNTY WASHlNCTON a R/CHT-OF-WAY �rS Y I I / 6 PROJECT No. 2118 1 CENTER OF PROPOSED DRAWING No. 2118new-culdesoc 1OF2.dwg o CUL-DE-SAC LOT 6 DATE: SEPTEMBER 19, 2000 30'130' LOT 7 SCALE: 1'=100' 2` / c 7 DRAWN BY: RKE/WEL N i CHECKED BY: KRA Li SEE DETAIL "ALO " 2 SHEET 2 OF 2 V1 W 00 yJ ,^ VI A z v' 8 > coo a c � ^ v LO warn to _ M o0 to $ � ;O s .� IL z 1 o was so (P) PLAT (M) MEASURED r�'AL Lt►T� 30' 30' (C) CALCULATED EXPIRES: 9/24/01 KENNETH R. ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES. INC. Surwylap, floppinp and Land PloaMay ' P.O. BOX 4173 Federal Way. WasAin9ton 98053-4173 o 274TH STREET S.E. ,Des mopes()3) &38-1199 - Fuc (2s3) 83a-a164 SHEET 1 OF 2 CONSENT CALENDAR 6 . City Council Action: Councilmember l ^1� --/ moves, Councilmember seconds that Consent Calendar Items A through U be approved. Discussion �� Action 1, 6A. Approval of Minutes . Approval of the minutes of the regular Council meeting of January 2 , 2001 . 6B. ';Approval of Bills. Nothing for approval, as the Operations Committee meeting was cancelled. Approval of checks issued for payroll for December 1 through December 15 and paid on December 20, 2000; as well as payroll of December 16 through December 31 and paid on January 5, 2001 : Date Check Numbers Amount 12/20/00 Checks 248645-248934 $ 268 , 173 . 85 12/20/00 Advices 104524-105159 988 . 788 . 76 $1, 256, 962 . 61 1/5/01 Checks 248935-249228 $ 241, 620 . 62 1/5/01 Advices 105160-105852 934 , 501 . 02 $1, 176, 121 . 64 Council Agenda Item No. 6 A-B r Kent, Washington January 2 , 2001 The regular meeting of the Kent City Council was called to order at 7 : 00 p.m. by Mayor White . Councilmembers present : Amodt, Brotherton, Clark, Epperly, Orr, Woods and Yingling . Others present : Chief Administrative Officer McFall, City Attorney Lubovich, Police Chief Crawford, Fire Chief Angelo, Deputy Assistant Chief Administrative Officer Martin, Public Works Director Wickstrom, Planning Manager Satterstrom, Finance Director Miller, and Parks, Recreation and Community Services Director Hodgson, and Employee Services Director Viseth. Approximately 30 people were at the meeting. CHANGES TO THE AGENDA The City Attorney requested the addition of 1) an ordinance amending the tax levy ordinance and 2) an interlocal agreement regarding art on the parking garage under Other Business . There was no opposition from Council and they were added as Items 7B and 7C. The Mayor requested the addition of confirmation of two appointments to the Consent Calendar, and they were added as Item 6G. Continued Communications Items 11A, 11B, 11C and 11D were added at the request of Martin Plys, Joe Rubio, and Ted Kogita. John Gardner, 11119 SE 244th, voiced concern about runoff from Daniel Elementary School and said he has not received any assistance from the City. Mayor White explained that the school district is separate from the City and that he should contact them. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Kent Police Department Teddy Bear Program. Pastor John Jendresen from Kent Christian Center explained that the church has collected nearly 200 teddy bears for the Kent Police Department to give to children in need. He expressed appreciation to the Police Department and pre- sented Officer Sprague with a few of the bears. Officer Sprague thanked the Kent Christian Center and explained that the bears are given to children who are terminally ill, as well as those in difficult situations . Employee of the Month. Mayor White announced that Cindy Riege, Senior Engineering Technician in the Public Works 1 Kent City Council Minutes January 2 , 2001 PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Engineering Department, has been chosen as the Employee of the Month for January. He noted that she works with the public at the customer service counter and with project engineers on city projects . He commended her for her work ethic and her outstanding efforts on the Wellness Committee . Public Works Director Wickstrom added that Ms . Riege has been a stellar employee for fifteen years . She was then presented the Employee of the Month plaque. CONSENT CALENDAR ORR MOVED to approve Consent Calendar Items A through G. Woods seconded and the motion carried. MINUTES (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 6A) Approval of Minutes. APPROVAL of the minutes of the special meeting of December 5, 2000, and the regular Council meeting of December 12 , 2000 . SEWERS (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 6D) Sewer Latecomer Agreement. AUTHORIZATION for the Public Works Director to execute a sanitary sewer latecomer agreement with N & G Development, LLC for the plat of Rhododendron Estates, as recommended by the Public Works Committee . SOLID WASTE (OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 7A) Solid Waste, Recycling Materials And Yard Waste Ordinance And Contracts - First Reading. This con- stitutes the first reading of ordinances and contracts relating to solid waste, recyclable materials, and yard waste collection, disposal, and processing. The City currently contracts with Waste Management of Washington, Inc . and Kent Meridian Disposal for this service. These contracts are due to expire March 31, 2001 . The City has entered into negotiations for new 10-year contracts. The proposed ordinance amends Chapter 7 . 03 of the Kent City Code relating to solid waste. These amendments are recommended to be consistent with the provisions of the new proposed franchise contracts . 2 Kent City Council Minutes January 2 , 2001 SOLID WASTE The City Attorney explained the situation and noted that the City would receive free pickup at their facilities, resulting in quite a savings . He said territories would remain the same, and that areas annexed in the future would use the same hauler as they did before . He noted that pickup would be mandatory, that there would be a single blended rate, and that the cost of living adjust- ment would be 80% of the CPI . He explained that the reason for amendments to Kent City Code Chapter 7 . 03 is that there are changes to the hauling provisions in the contracts, and this will result in consistency. Wickstrom pointed out that the Public Works Committee will make a recommendation to the Council . Lubovich clarified that during holidays and inclement weather, double loads would be picked up at no additional cost . It was noted that the haulers provide citizens with a calendar of pickup dates . TRANSPORTATION (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 6E) Washinaton State Department Of Transportation Grant Agreement, 277th St Reconstruction, West Valley To Auburn Way North. AUTHORIZATION for the Mayor to sign the grant agreement, direct staff to accept the grant in the amount of $1, 942, 119 and establish a budget for the funds to be used within the South 277th St Reconstruction Project - West Valley Highway to Auburn Way North, as recommended by the Public Works Committee. TRAFFIC (PUBLIC HEARINGS - ITEM 5A) LID 354, Washington Avenue HOV Lanes and Meeker Street Widening Improvement. This date has been set for the public hearing on the formation of LID 354, Washington Avenue HOV Lanes and Meeker Street Widening Improvement . Wickstrom explained that the purpose of the hearing is to determine whether or not to form the LID. He out- lined the improvements which would be made on Meeker Street and Washington Avenue, and noted that the LID would help finance these improvements . He explained that the total cost is $4 , 000, 000 and that LID would cover approximately 12% or $480, 000 . He said the 3 Kent City Council Minutes January 2 , 2001 TRAFFIC property owners who attended a meeting on November 15 were supportive of the project, and then explained the methods of assessment and payment . CLARK MOVED to make a letter from Robert Heller, on behalf of Kent K-Mart Center, a part of the record. Orr seconded and the motion carried. Wickstrom noted for Yingling that spot acquisition is required and that the project should be completed in 2002 . Amodt voiced concern about the HOV lanes, and Wickstrom pointed out that the grant was received based on the HOV lanes. Brotherton requested information on how congestion will be affected and whether the bridge would be widened. Mayor White opened the public hearing. Joe Rubio, 3831 S . 248th, suggested either not making the extra lane an HOV lane, or making it reversible. Martin Plys, 3004 S . 256th, said something should be done about the conges- tion caused by the bottleneck at the bridge on Meeker Street . Dan Barrett, 16150 119th Avenue SE, Renton, voiced concern that property owners' money would be spent but the traffic problem would not be solved. Randy Clark, 2114 S . 279 Place, Federal Way, a business owner in the area, expressed concern about the loss of display area and questioned whether the city will put in a barrier for security. He emphasized that street projects result in a negative impact on businesses . There were no further comments from the audience and ORR MOVED to close the public hearing. Woods seconded and the motion carried. CLARK MOVED to authorize the formation of LID 354 for the Washington Avenue HOV Lanes and Meeker Street Widening Improvement Project and to direct the City Attorney to prepare the necessary ordinance. Woods seconded. Clark clarified that the city must demon- strate to the state that progress is being made on this type of project, and said that the 228th corridor will bring the most relief . Yingling spoke in favor of forming the LID and upon Amodt ' s question, Wickstrom explained that these grant funds cannot be used for reversible lanes. Clark' s motion then carried. 4 Kent City Council Minutes January 2 , 2001 TRAFFIC (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 6F) West Hill Signal Traffic Interconnect Proiect Funding Transfer. AUTHORIZATION to transfer the funds from the Kent Kangley Interconnect project to fund the West Hill Signal Traffic Interconnect Project, as recommended by the Public Works Committee. (BIDS - ITEM 8A) West Hill Signal Traffic Interconnect Project. The bid opening for this project was held on December 5th with three bids received. The low bid was submitted by Potelco, Inc . in the amount of $77, 120 . 00 . The Engineer' s estimate was $91 , 120 . 00 . The Public Works Director recommends awarding this contract to Potelco, Inc . CLARK MOVED that the West Hill Signal Traffic Interconnect contract be awarded to Potelco, Inc . in the amount of $77, 120 . Epperly seconded and the motion carried. ALLEY VACATION (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 6C) Alley Vacation Between lot And 2nd, Smith And Temperance. PASSAGE of Resolution No. 1581 setting a public hearing date of February 6th for the Alley Vacation between 1st & 2nd/Temperance & Smith, as recommended by the Public Works Committee . APPOINTMENTS (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 6G) (ADDED ITEM) Appointments. CONFIRMATION of the Mayor' s appointment of Mr. John Daniels to serve as a member of the Kent Drinking Driver Task Force . Mr. Daniels is a Kent resident and practiced law before his retirement . He has a BA from Northwestern University in Evanston, Illinois, and received his JD Degree from the University of Arizona, College of Law, at Tucson, Arizona. In addition to his law practice, Mr. Daniels served in the US Naval Reserve in the Judge Advocate General ' s Corps and also worked for the Arizona Department of Health Services. His volunteer service includes American Red Cross, food bank director, Kiwanis and VA Hospital law. 5 Kent City Council Minutes January 2 , 2001 APPOINTMENTS Mr. Daniels will replace Mary Lou Becvar, whose term expired, and his new term will continue until 1/1/2004 ; and CONFIRMATION of his reappointment of Councilmember Tom Brotherton to continue serving as a Council repre- sentative to the Kent LEOFF 1 Disability Retirement Board. His new term will continue until 12/31/2002 . PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY SERVICES (OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 7C) (ADDED OTHER BUSINESS ITEM 7C) Sound Transit Agreement. The City Attorney distributed copies of an interlocal agreement with Sound Transit for the installation of art at the Sound Transit parking garage . He noted that the Arts Commission has approved $45, 000 for the commission of certain art at the garage . McFall noted for Amodt that the money will come from the $2 . 00 per capita which the City puts into the Arts Commission for public art . WOODS MOVED to authorize the Mayor to execute an interlocal agreement with the Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority (Sound Transit) for the design, fabrication, installation, ownership and maintenance of artwork at the parking garage, as approved by the City of Kent Arts Commission. Orr seconded and the motion carried. (CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS - ITEM 11A) City Administration. Yingling noted that earlier in the meeting Mr. Plys asked to speak on things of a personal nature having to do with the City Administrator. He objected to such discussion and opined that Mr. Plys should deal with the issue in private. There was no motion to place such a discussion on the agenda. Mayor White noted for Joe Rubio that he is responsible for hiring, that he refused Mr. McFall ' s offer to resign and that the issue is over. (CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS - ITEM 11D) Performinc Arts Center, Martin Plys stated that the people voted no on the Performing Arts Center and that they are adamantly opposed to using public funding for one . Mayor White assured Plys that there is no movement by the City to support a performing arts center. 6 Kent City Council Minutes January 2 , 2001 PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY SERVICES Bill Youncr asked why the manager of the performing arts center was on the payroll until the end of December and said that many people feel he should have been terminated the day after the bond issue failed. He said keeping the manager has cost taxpayers at least $30, 000 . Yingling explained that the manager was taken off the payroll at the next Council meeting and that the Performing Arts Center Board used donated funds to pay the remaining portion of his contract . CENSORSHIP (CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS - ITEM 11C) Censorship. Ted Kogita, 25227 Reith Road, said he has been denied his right to speak at Council meetings and Operations Committee meetings . FINANCE (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 6B) Approval of Bills. Nothing for approval, as the Operations Committee meeting was cancelled. (OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 7B) (ADDED OTHER BUSINESS ITEM 7B) Tax Levy Ordinance. McFall noted that in the Mayor' s proposed budget, there was a property tax increase in collections of 2 . 61% which was modified by the Council to 2% . He stated that since that time, figures have been received from King County which would result in increased collections of greater than 2% . He explained that the ordinance clarifies that the guiding element for the County Assessor would be the 2% limit . He recommended adoption of the ordinance acknowledging the reduction. YINGLING MOVED to adopt Ordinance No. 3539 which amends Ordinance No. 3532 by reducing the amount levied in Ordinance No. 3532 by $55, 570 for a total regular levy of $19, 764, 357, thereby adjusting the regular property tax levy to the intended 2% increase for inflation as described by Referendum 47 . Epperly seconded. McFall noted for Mayor White that the rate is now 3 . 008 per $1000 of assessed value. The motion then carried with Amodt opposed. 7 Kent City Council Minutes January 2 , 2001 FINANCE (CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS - ITEM 11B) Funding. Joe Rubio distributed copies of information regarding lawsuits and said that the Citizens for Common Cents, in conjunction with Kent Community Councils and the Kent Citizens Association, feel the Council should not fund both the Mayor and the Operations Officer, that only one or the other should be funded. REPORTS Operations Committee. Yingling noted that the next meeting will be on January 16 . Public Works. Clark noted that, due to the holiday, the committee will meet on January 8th and January 22nd, and that waste disposal contracts will be discussed on the 8th. Planning Committee. Brotherton noted that the meeting has been moved to January 8th at 4 : 00 p .m. , and that they will discuss urban separators and temporary structures . Parks Committee. Woods noted that the committee will next meet on January 9th at 4 : 00 p.m. Administrative Reports. McFall introduced and welcomed Deputy Chief Administrative Officer Mike Martin. McFall reminded Councilmembers of an executive session regarding potential litigation and noted that action is anticipated at the conclusion of the executive session. EXECUTIVE SESSION The meeting recessed to Executive Session at 8 : 21 p.m. and reconvened at 9 : 00 p.m. CLARK MOVED to authorize staff to notify the National Marine Fisheries Service and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service of the City' s intent to commence efforts to develop a Habitat Conservation Plan and corresponding National Environmental Protection Agency documents, for the purpose of securing an Incidental Take Permit under Section 10 of the Endangered Species Act for Kent ' s Clark Springs/Rock Creek municipal water a Kent City Council Minutes January 2 , 2001 EXECUTIVE SESSION supply facilities and related water withdrawals ; to this end, the Council also authorizes staff and legal counsel to retain all appropriate technical and legal assistance to advance this objective. Yingling seconded and the motion carried. ADJOURNMENT At 9 : 02 p .m. , ORR MOVED to adjourn. Woods seconded and the motion carried. Brenda Jaco , CMC City Clerk 9 Kent City Council Meeting Date January 16 , 2001 Category Consent Calendar 1 . SUBJECT: KENT ARTS COMMISSION 2001 CITY ART PLAN & FIVE-YEAR CITY ART PLAN - ACCEPT AND BUDGET 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Accept and budget the 2001 City Art Plan and five-year Art Plan, as recommended by the Arts Commission. The Kent Arts Commission has developed and approved a City Art Plan for the year 2001 and a Five-year Art Plan for the years 2001 through 2005 . The City Art program and fund was established in accordance with Ordinance No. 2552 . 3 . EXHIBITS: 2001 City Art Plan and Five-year City Art Plan 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Kent Arts Commission, Staff, & Parks Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc . ) S . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS : 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 6C CITY OF KENT Parks, Recreation & Community Services Kent Arts Commission 2001 CITY ART PLAN a� FIVE YEAR CITY ART PLAN Created: October 30, 2000 Approved: Visual Arts Committee November 20, 2000 Kent Arts Commission November 28, 2000 Cibj Council Sub-Committee: Cibj Council: P:%CULTS\C ITYART\5yea rplan2000.doc CITY OF KENT Parks, Recreation & Community Services Kent Arts Commission — 2001 CITY ART PLAN PROJECTS 2001 Millennium/Kent Commons Entrance Artwork 65,500 Ice Arena Entry Artwork 35,000 Community Art Project - Canterbury Park 12,000 Reclamation Art Project - East Hill Skate Park 6,000 Service Club Ball Fields Art Planning 5,000 Portable Collection Purchases 4,000 Subtotal $127,500 OTHER EXPENSES Administration 61 ,000 Maintenance, Supplies 7,100 Insurance 1,500 Design Fee, Honorariums, Professional Services 6,700 Postage and Printing 2,800 Subtotal $79,100 TOTAL $206,600 2 KENT ARTS COMMISSION — 2001 CITY ART PLAN Proiect Title: Millennium/Kent Commons Entrance Artwork Project Description: A professional artist would be hired to create an artwork that is conceptually tied to the millennium and the Kent Community. The artwork would replace the existing artwork at the entrance of the Kent Commons. Estimated 2000 Costs: $65,500 Funding_Source: City Art Plan Background: The Arts Commission recommends that a new public artwork be commissioned for the entrance of the Kent Commons. The new work will be intended to better utilize the entrance area space and provide a more functional and aesthetically pleasing environment to welcome visitors to the facility. The Commons is a focal point of the Kent community for a diverse array of people and the millennium offers an ideal moment to commemorate our city and community. Proiect Title: Ice Arena Entry Artwork Proiect Description: A professional artist would be hired to work with Parks staff and the project developers to conceptualize, design, create and install an original artwork, such as a gateway element, at the entrance of the new Ice Arena that will complement the function of the building and welcome visitors to the facility. Estimated 2000 Costs: $35,000 Funding Source: City Art Plan Background: The KAC recognizes that this new recreation facility is an important project for the community of Kent. The presence of art in the front of what is likely to be a highly used facility would allow citizens to enjoy the artworks as a part of their planned activities. By contributing funds for art at this facility, the KAC will be including art into a new capital project that will have high visibility to the community, especially families and youth of Kent. 3 Project Title: Community Art Project - Canterbury Park Project Description: A professional artist with experience in working with communities to develop art projects will be hired to facilitate planning, design, execution and installation of artwork (s) at Canterbury Park. Estimated 2000 Costs: $12,000 Funding Source: City Art Plan Background: Anticipated users are residents of the Canterbury Park neighborhood. Art projects that involve area residents in planning, designing and creating artworks under the direction of a professional artist, such as the successful Meridian Community Public Artworks, contribute to a sense of community pride. This also creates a sense of ownership that results in curbed vandalism and lowered maintenance costs for our Parks Maintenance division. Project Title: Reclamation Art Project - East Hill Skate Park Project Description: This project, located at East Hill Skate Park, is a collaboration between the youth, a professional artist, and the Kent Arts Commission. The public artwork would be a lasting tribute to the positive focus of the youth. Like other successful Reclamation Art Projects, this project would involve a professional artist who would help youth visually depict their messages in a creative way and provide technical expertise for production. The overall design of the project will be determined by the youth in cooperation with the artist, Kent Arts Commission and Parks Department staff. Estimated 2000 Costs: S6,000 Funding Source: City Art Plan Background: The first Reclamation Art Project, "Dig It" in West Fenwick Park, was completed by students of Kent West High School in 1994. Following the success of that project, four works were completed in 1995, two in 1996, three in 1997, two in 1998, two in 1999 and one in 2000 throughout the City. The response from the youth and the community has been extremely positive. The projects have promoted the City's interest in working with youth. Vandalism has declined were art occurs and accordingly the City has saved money in maintenance. 4 Project Title: Service Club Ballfields Artwork Planning Proiect Description: An artist would be hired to work with staff, architects, landscape architects, etc. to define opportunities for artwork to be integrated into the ballfields planned for 2002. Young peopleluser groups will be included in the planning process. Estimated 2000 Costs: $5,000 Funding Source: City Art Plan Background: The Arts Commission recommends that public art have a presence in the new Service Club Ballfields. The artwork will provide functional and aesthetically elements as part of the site that will have high visibility to the youth and families of the area. Proiect Title: Portable Collection Purchases Project Description: Purchase high quality artworks from the Kent Canterbury Faire Juried Fine Art Exhibit. The artworks will be exhibited in publicly accessible areas of the City of Kent facilities. Estimated 2000 Costs: $4,000 Funding Source: City Art Plan Background: The City of Kent Arts Commission has established a collection of portable artwork that includes paintings, prints and other works. The purchase awards at the Canterbury Faire Fine Art Exhibit bring a higher quality of work to the exhibit and allow the City to obtain artwork to enhance the public buildings. This program also supports local artists and promotes participation in City programs. 5 CITY OF KENT ARTS COMMISSION 2001 -2006 CITY ART PLAN 2001 PROJECTS COSTS Millennium/Kent Commons Entrance Artwork 65,500 Ice Arena Entry Artwork 35,000 Community Art Project - Canterbury Park 12,000 Reclamation Art Project - East Hill Skate Park 6,000 Service Club Ball Fields Art Planning 5,000 Portable Collection Purchases 4,000 Administrative & Maintenance 79,100 Approximate Year Total $206,600 2002 PROJECTS COSTS Capital Project Artwork* 30,000 Reclamation Art Project" 6,000 Community Art Project*** 8,000 Collection Documentation/Educational/Promotional Materials 20,000 132"d Avenue Park Art Studio & Park Art Planning 5,000 Train Corridor Improvement Master plan 7,500 -- Train Corridor Improvement, Phase 1 10,000 Portable Collection Purchases 4,000 Administration Maintenance 81,000 Approximate Year Total $171,500 2002 IDEAS: *Service Club Ball Fields, phase 2 **Mural at downtown Virginia Tavern by Kent-Meridian HS Art Club 'Green River Disabled Fishing Access - Community Art Project 132"d Ave Studio/Park (200212003) Train Corridor Improvements through artwork 2003 PROJECTS COSTS Capital Project Artwork* 40,000 Reclamation Art Project" 6,000 Community Art/Train Corridor Improvements, Phase II 20,000 Portable Collection Purchases 4,000 Administration/Maintenance 83,000 Approximate Year Total $153,000 s 2003 IDEAS: *132"d Studio/Park Artwork ($40,000) **272"d Neighborhood Park International Artist Exchange/With Sister Cities 2004 PROJECTS COSTS Capital Project Artwork* 70,000 Community Art Project (2)** 14,000 Capital Project Art Planning 5,000 Portable Collection Purchases 4,000 Administration/Maintenance 85,000 Approximate Year Total $178,000 2004 IDEAS: *Commemorative Art "In Honor of Those Who Serve" **West Hill Neighborhood Park (Military Road) & Linda Heights Neighborhood Park -play area East Hill Youth Sports Facility#1 (Planning 200412005) 2005 PROJECTS COSTS Capital Project Artwork* 50,000 Capital Project Artwork Planning** 15,000 Portable Collection Purchases 4,000 Administration/Maintenance 87,000 Approximate Year Total $156,000 2005 IDEAS: *East Hill Youth Sports Facility#1 Artwork (include youth) **Clark Lake Integrated Artwork Planning (R Tomlinson) ($5,000) and Valley Floor Athletic Complex Planning ($10,000) 2006 PROJECTS COSTS Capital Projects Artwork 100,000 Portable Collection Purchases 4,000 Administration/Maintenance 89,000 Approximate Year Total $193,000 2006 IDEAS: Clark Lake Integrated Artwork (200612007) $30,000 Valley Floor Athletic Complex Artwork (200612007) $70,000 7 Wir Kent City Council Meeting Date January 16 , 2001 Category Consent Calendar 1 . SUBJECT: IAC YOUTH ATHLETIC FACILITIES GRANT - ACCEPT AND BUDGET 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Accept and budget the $24 , 304 . 00 IAC Youth Athletic Facilities Grant for improvements to Field #2 and #3 at Kent Memorial Park. The Parks Planning and Development Division applied for and received a Youth Athletic Facility Grant from the Interagency Committee for Outdoor Recreation (IAC) to make improvements to Field #2 and #3 at Kent Memorial Park. 3 . EXHIBITS: Letter of award from IAC 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Staff and Parks Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc . ) S . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES X 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $24 , 305 in grant matching funds SOURCE OF FUNDS : CIP 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 6D Interagency Committee for Outdoor Recreation �a�ete"o Salmon Recovery Funding Board a 360/902.3000 - 360/902-2636 360/902-3026 (fax) 360/902-3026 (fax) erilail: info@iac.wa.gov "� iBe9 a° email: salmon@iac.wa.gov STATE OF WASHINGTON OFFICE OF THE INTERAGENCY COMMITTEE 1111 Washington Street SE PO Box 40917 September 22, 2000 Olympia, WA 98504-0917 Shane Gilbertson Kent Parks & Rec Dept 220 4th Avenue South Kent, WA 98032-5895 RE: Kent Memorial Park Field Maintenance, IAC #00-1306D Dear Mr. Gilbertson: Congratulations on your successful application for grant funds for the Kent Memorial Park Field Maintenance project. Your project is administered through the Office of the Interagency Committee (IAC). Enclosed are two original sets of project agreement materials. Each set contains the Project Agreement, Milestone Report, Eligible Reimbursement Activities Report, and a customized Invoice Voucher. Also enclosed are appropriate policy and participation manuals for you to refer to as you implement your project and seek reimbursement. After - reviewing your Project Agreement materials, please have the appropriate person sign each Project Agreement and return one signed original to the IAC. After the Project Agreement is signed and returned, the Kent Memorial Park Field Maintenance project can commence. Prompt implementation and completion of your project is extremely important. It will ensure the continuing success and credibility of the YAF - Maintenance program by demonstrating effective results to citizens and policy makers. Also, completing your project in a timely manner allows our office to provide project reimbursement to you more rapidly. We encourage you to offer appropriate media opportunities to help build public awareness of the project's purposes and benefits. Please notify your IAC project manager of any event celebrating your project's beginning or completion. As always, our staff members are available to answer questions that may arise during project implementation. If you need assistance please contact Darrell Jennings at (360) 902-3020 or darrellj@iac.wa.gov. Thank you again for helping make this valuable investment in Washington State's recreation, conservation, and natural resources. Sincerely, /a" (f. Laura Eckert Johnson Director Enclosures AGRECVR RPT �g Kent City Council Meeting Date January 16 , 2001 Category Consent Calendar 1 . SUBJECT: LID 354 , WASHINGTON AVE HOV LANES AND MEEKER STREET WIDENING IMPROVEMENT - ORDINANCE 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by Council , adoption of Ordinance No. approving the formation of LID #354 - Washington Avenue/Meeker Street . 3 . EXHIBITS: Ordinance 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Council 1/2/01 (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc . ) 5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS : 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 6E ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City of Kent, Washington, ordering the construction of the Meeker Street widening and Washington Avenue HOV lanes improvements project all in accordance with Resolution No. 1579 of the City Council; establishing Local Improvement District No. 354 and ordering the carrying out of the proposed improvement; providing that payment for the improvement be made in part by special assessments upon the property in the District, payable by the mode of "payment by bonds"; and providing for the issuance and sale of local improvement district warrants redeemable in cash or other short-term financing and local improvement district bonds. y I WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 1579 adopted December 12, 2000, the City Council declared its intention to order the construction of the Meeker Street widening and Washington Avenue HOV lanes improvements project, and fixed January 2, 2001, at 7:00 p.m., local time, in the Council Chambers of the City Hall as the time and place for hearing all matters relating to the proposed improvement i! and all comments thereon and objections thereto and for determining the method of j payment for the improvement; and WHEREAS, the Citv's Director of Public Works caused an estimate to be made of the cost and expense of the proposed improvement and certified that estimate to the City Council, together with all papers and information in his possession touching the proposed improvement, a description of the boundaries of the proposed local improvement district and a statement of what portion of the cost and expense of the improvement should be borne by the property within the proposed district; and � 1 i Establish Formation of LID 354 WHEREAS, that estimate is accompanied by a diagram of the proposed improvement showing thereon the lots, tracts, parcels of land, and other property which will be specially benefited by the proposed improvement and the estimated cost and expense thereof to be borne by each lot, tract and parcel of land or other property; and WHEREAS, due notice of the above hearing was given in the manner provided by law, and the hearing was held by the City Council on the date and at i the time above mentioned, and all persons appearing at such hearing and wishing to be heard were heard; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined it to be in the best interests of the City that the improvement as hereinafter described be carried out and that a local improvement district be created in connection therewith; NOW. THEREFORE, i h THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON. DOES HEREBY ORDAIN as follows: i SECTION I. The City Council of the City of Kent, Washington (the "City"), orders the construction of the Meeker Street widening and Washington Avenue HOV lanes improvements project as more fully described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and by this reference made incorporated herein. All of the foregoing shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications therefor prepared by the Director of Public Works of the City, and may be modified by the City Council as long as such modification does not affect the purpose of the improvement. SECTION 2. There is created and established a local improvement district to be called Local Improvement District No. 354 of the City of Kent, Washington (the "District"), the boundaries or territorial extent of the District being Establish Formation of LID 354 T more particularly described in Exhibit B attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. SECTION 3. The total estimated cost and expense of the improvement is declared to be $3,994,388. Approximately $480,400 of the cost and expense shall be borne by and assessed against the property specially benefited by such improvement included in the District which embraces as nearly as practicable all property specially benefited by such improvement and the balance of such cost and expense shall be paid by the City. SECTION 4. In accordance with the provisions of RCW 35.44.047, I' the City may use any method or combination of methods to compute assessments which may be deemed to more fairly reflect the special benefits to the properties j being assessed than the statutory method of assessing the properties. SECTION 5. Local improvement district warrants may be issued in j' payment of the cost and expense of the improvement herein ordered to be assessed. such warrants to be paid out of the Local Improvement Fund, District No. 354, hereinafter created and referred to as the Local Improvement Fund, and, until the bonds referred to in this section are issued and delivered to the purchaser thereof, to bear interest from the date thereof at a rate to be established hereafter by the City's Finance Department Director, as issuing officer, and to be redeemed in cash and/or I' by local improvement district bonds herein authorized to be issued, such interest- bearing warrants to be hereafter referred to as "revenue warrants." In the alternative, the City hereafter may provide by ordinance for the issuance of other short-term obligations pursuant to chapter 39.50 RCW. If the City shall authorize expenditures to be made for such improvement (other than for any cost or expense expected to be borne by the City) prior to the date that any short-term obligations or local improvement district bonds j are issued to finance the improvement, from proceeds of interfund loans or other i funds that are not, and are not reasonably expected to be, reserved, allocated on a 3 Establish Formation of LID 354 long-term basis or otherwise set aside to pay the cost of the improvement herein ordered to be assessed against the property specially benefited thereby, the City declares its official intent that those expenditures, to the extent not reimbursed with prepaid special benefit assessments, are to be reimbursed from proceeds of short- term obligations or local improvement district bonds that are expected to be issued for the improvement in a principal amount not exceeding $480,400. The City is authorized to issue local improvement district bonds for the District which shall bear interest at a rate and be payable on or before a date to I I be hereafter fixed by ordinance. The bonds shall be issued in exchange for and/or i in redemption of any and all revenue warrants issued hereunder or other short-term obligations hereafter authorized and not redeemed in cash within twenty days after the expiration of the thirty-day period for the cash payment without interest of assessments on the assessment roll for the District. The bonds shall be paid and redeemed by the collection of special assessments to be levied and assessed against the property within the District, payable in annual installments, with interest at a rate to be hereafter fixed by ordinance under the mode of "payment by bonds," as 11 defined by law and the ordinances of the City. The exact form, amount, date, interest rate and denominations of such bonds hereafter shall be fixed by ordinance I of the City Council. Such bonds shall be sold in such manner as the City Council hereafter shall determine. SECTION 6. For the purpose of paying all or a part of the costs of I'll carrying out the improvements within the District pending the receipt of the proceeds of the issuance and sale of the bonds or short-term obligations referred to in Section 5, interf ind loans from the General Fund and/or Street Fund to the Local Improvement Fund in the maximum aggregate amount of$480,400 are authorized and approved, those loans to be repaid on or before the issuance of such bonds or i libations from the proceeds thereof. Each of the interfund loans shall bear interest at a variable rate, adjusted the 151h and last day of each month, equal to the interest rate of the State of Washington Local Government Investment Pool on the 15`h and i 4 Establish Formation of LID 354 last day of each month. The initial interest rate on the date of each interfund loan shall be determined as of the last preceding interest payment adjustment date. SECTION 7. In all cases where the work necessary to be done in connection with the making of such improvement is carried out pursuant to contract upon competitive bids (and the City shall have and reserves the right to reject any and all bids), the call-for bids shall include a statement that payment for such work i will be made in cash warrants drawn upon the Local Improvement Fund. 'I SECTION 8. The Local Improvement Fund for the District is created and established in the office of the Finance Department Director of the City. The proceeds from the sale of revenue wan-ants or other short-term obligations drawn against the fund which may be issued and sold by the City and the collections of special assessments, interest and penalties thereon shall be deposited in the Local Improvement Fund. Cash warrants to the contractor or contractors in payment for the work to be done by them in connection with the improvement and j! cash warrants in payment for all other items of expense in connection with the improvement shall be issued against the Local Improvement Fund. it SECTION 9. Within 15 days of the passage of this ordinance there shall be filed with the Finance Department Director of the City the title of the improvement and District number, a copy of the diagram or print showing the boundaries of the District and the preliminary assessment roll or abstract of such roll showing thereon the lots, tracts and parcels of land that will be specially benefited thereby and the estimated cost and expense of such improvement to be borne by each lot, tract or parcel of land. The Finance Department Director of the City immediately shall post the proposed assessment roll upon her index of local ij improvement assessments against the properties affected by the local improvement. I I I i 5 Establish Formation of LID 354 SECTION 10. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force five (5) days from and after passage and five (5) days following its publication as required by law. JIM WHITE, MAYOR ATTEST: BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: LEE VOORHEES FOSTER PEPPER & SHEFELMAN PLLC Special Counsel and Bond Counsel PASSED: day of 12001. APPROVED: day of 2001. PUBLISHED: day of 2001. I i I 6 Establish Formation of LID 354 I CERTIFICATION I, the undersigned, City Clerk of the City of Kent, Washington (the "City"), hereby certify as follows: 1. The attached copy of Ordinance No. (the "Ordinance") is a full, true and correct copy of an ordinance duly passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City held at the regular meeting place thereof on January 16, 2001, as that ordinance appears on the minute book of the City; and the Ordinance will be in full force and effect five days after the publication of its summary in the City's official newspaper; and 2. A quorum of the members of the City Council was present throughout the meeting and a majority of those members present voted in the proper manner for the passage of the Ordinance. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this day of 2001. I CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON (SEAL) BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK P` wi1\Ordi ncc LID730om m.Aoc II it I 7 u Establish Formation of LID 354 EXHIBIT "A" DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS LID 354 - Washington Avenue HOV Lanes and Meeker Street Widening Improvements (Hawley Road to James Street and 64th Avenue to Washington Avenue) ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS The proposed project will improve Washington Avenue between Hawley Road (S. 251st St.) and James Street and will improve Meeker Street between Washington Avenue and 64th Avenue South. The project includes the following improvements on Washington Avenue: 1. High Occupancy Vehicle lane northbound between Willis and Meeker Street 2. High Occupancy Vehicle lane southbound between Smith and Willis Street 3. Concrete curbs, gutter and sidewalks 4. . Installation of street trees 5. Upgrade existing signals at Willis Street (SR-516) and Meeker Street 6. Right turn only lane northbound at Willis Street 7. New storm pump station and bioswale near Green River bridge 8. Upgrades to the existing illumination system The following improvements will be included on Meeker Street: 1. Widen roadway to provide new general purpose travel lane eastbound and westbound (5 lanes total) 2. Concrete curbs, gutter and 10 foot sidewalks 3. Upgrade and relocate existing signal at 64th Avenue South 4. Exclusive right-turn only lane from southbound 64th Avenue to westbound Meeker Street 5. Upgrades to the existing illumination system 6. Landscaping EXHIBIT `B ' Boundary Legal Description LID #354 Washington Avenue HOV Lanes and Meeker Street Widening Improvements (Hawley Road to James Street and 641h Avenue to Washington Avenue) LOT 1 BLOCK 7 KENTHURST ADD LESS ST AND LOT 9 BLOCK 7 KENTHURST ADD TGW FOR OF VAC ST ADJ AND ALSO THE NORTH 85 FT OF TRACT 24 EXC WEST 17 FT CONVEYED TO CITY OF KENT BY DEED UNDER REC NO 9409141218 IN MEEKER'S SUPPLEMENTAL PLAT OF FIRST ADDITION TO TOWN OF KENT AND ALSO THE NORTH 1/2 LESS ST OF FOLG-N 340 FT OF TRACT 24 LESS NORTH 85 FT THOF & LESS ANY POR WITHIN SOUTH 71 FT OF SD TR LESS EAST 296 FT IN MEEKERS SUPL PLAT 1ST ADD TO KENT AND ALSO THE SOUTH 1/2 OF TRACT 24 LESS NORTH 85 FT & LESS SOUTH 71 FT IN MEEKERS SUPL PLAT 1ST ADD TO KENT AND ALSO THE NORTH 168.5 FT OF SOUTH 303 FT OF TRACT 23 IN MEEKERS SUPL PLAT 1ST ADD TO KENT AND ALSO THAT PORTION TR 16 S OF ELY PROD OF NORTH LN OF SOUTH 134.5 FT OF TR 23 & WLY OF ST HWY POR TR 17 LY WLY OF ST HWY ALL OF TR 20 TR 21 LESS W 80 FT OF S 133 FT & N 80 FT OF TR 22 & S 134.5 FT OF TR 23 ALL IN MEEKERS SUPL PLAT 1ST ADD TO KENT AND ALSO THE WEST 80 FT OF SOUTH 133 FT OF TRACT 21 & SOUTH 133 FT OF TRACT 22 LESS ST HWY ALL IN MEEKERS SUPL PLAT 1ST ADD TO KENT AND ALSO THE LOTS 1-2 &WEST 10 FT OF 3, BLOCK A, ALL IN MEEKERS SUPL PLAT 1ST ADD TO KENT AND ALSO THE NORTH 112 OF LOTS 23 THRU 30, BLOCK A, MEEKERS SUPL PLAT 1ST ADD TO KENT AND ALSO THE SOUTH 1/2 OF LOTS 23 THRU 30, BLOCK A, MEEKERS SUPL PLAT 1ST ADD TO KENT AND ALSO PARCEL 1 OF KENT SHORT PLAT NO SP 78-36 RECORDING NO 7812190862 SD PLAT DAF — FOR TR 43 MEEKERS SUPL PLAT 1ST ADD TO KENT AND ALSO POR OF LOT 43 DAF — FOR LY WLY OFST HWY 5-M & SLY OFALN798FTSOFNLNSDTR & NOF SIR 516 LESS W 777.98 FT THOF IN MEEKERS SUPL PLAT 1ST ADD TO KENT AND ALSO LOT 2 OF CITY OF KENT SHORT PLAT SP-83-7 REC NO 8409270783 SD PLAT DAF - POR TR 43 IN MEEKERS SUPL PLAT 1ST ADD TO KENT AND ALSO LOT 1 OF CITY OF KENT SHORT PLAT SP-83-7 REC NO 8409270783 SD LOT DAF — FOR LOT 43 IN MEEKERS SUPL PLAT 1ST ADD TO KENT AND ALSO LOT 3 OF CITY OF KENT SHORT PLAT SP-83-7 REC NO 8409270783 SD SHORT PLAT DAF — FOR LOT 43 IN MEEKERS SUPL PLAT 1ST ADD TO KENT AND ALSO THE SOUTH 150 FT OF EAST 150 FT OF TRACT 28 LESS POR AWARDED TO CITY OF KENT BY DECREE ENTERED 23 AUG 1989 IN KING CO SUP CT CAUSE NO 89-2-00067-9 IN MEEKERS SUPL PLAT 1ST ADD TO KENT AND ALSO LOT 28 LESS SOUTH 150 FT OF EAST 150 FT& POR OF 27 & 29 LY SOUTH OF WLY PROD OF S MGN OF SHINN ST LESS POR OF 29 LY WEST OF LN BEG ON SOUTH LN 819.17 FT WEST OF SE COR TR 28 TH NORTH 00-20- 17 WEST TO NORTH LN THOF IN MEEKERS SUPL PLAT 1ST ADD TO KENT AND ALSO LOT 2 CITY OF KENT SP 81-11 REC #8204290391 SD SP DAF— SOUTH 220.37 FT OF TRACT 26 SD SUBD LESS STREET IN MEEKERS SUPL PLAT 1ST ADD TO KENT AND ALSO LOTS 3 & 4 CITY OF KENT SHORT PLAT NO SP-81-11 RECORDING NO. 8204290391 BEING A PORTION OF LOT 26 IN MEEKER'S SUPPLEMENTAL PLAT OF FIRST ADDITION TO TOWN OF KENT AND ALSO LOT 1 CITY OF KENT SP 81-11 REC#8204290391 SD SP DAF—SOUTH 220.37 FT OF TRACT 26 SD SUBD LESS ST IN MEEKERS SUPL PLAT 1ST ADD TO KENT AND ALSO LOTS 1, 2 & 3 CITY OF KENT SHORT PLAT NO SP-89-12 (WASHINGTON AVENUE SHORT PLAT) RECORDING NO 9004191530 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF TRACT 25 & 26 IN MEEKERS SUPPLEMENTAL PLAT OF FIRST ADDITION TO TOWN OF KENT AND ALSO THE NORTH 161.70 FEET OF SOUTH 225.85 FEET OF TRACT 25 EXCEPT WEST 222.8 FEET OF NORTH 50.50 FEET IN MEEKERS SUPL PLAT 1ST ADD TO KENT AND ALSO THAT PORTION LOT 3 CITY OF KENT SHORT PLAT NO SP-74-12 (SPEC 74-11) RECORDING NO 7501100471 DAF: BEGIN AT SOUTHWEST CORNER SAID LOT 3 THENCE NORTH 89-37-13 EAST ALONG SOUTH LINE THEREOF 164.07 FEET THENCE NORTH 00-22-47 WEST 124.00 FEET THENCE SOUTH 89-37-13 WEST 160.43 FEET TO WEST LINE SAID LOT 3 THENCE SOUTH 01-18-11 WEST ALONG SAID WEST LINE 124.05 FEET TO POINT OF BEGINNING (AKA LOT 3 CITY OF KENT LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO LL-86-8.RECORDING NO. 8608100973) EXCEPT PORTION CONVEYED TO CITY OF KENT BY DEEDS UNDER REC NOS 9004252295 & 9004252296 BEING A PORTION LOT 29 IN SUPPLEMENTAL PLAT OF MEEKER'S FIRST ADDITION TO TOWN OF KENT AND ALSO LOT 1 CITY OF KENT SHORT PLAT NO SP-95-15 (PARK COURT) RECORDING NO 9511291035 BEING A PORTION OF TRACT 29 IN MEEKER'S FIRST ADDITION TO KENT SUPPLEMENTAL PLAT AND ALSO LOT 2 CITY OF KENT SHORT PLAT NO SP-95-15 (PARK COURT) RECORDING NO 9511291035 BEING A PORTION OF TRACT 29 IN MEEKER'S FIRST ADDITION TO KENT SUPPLEMENTAL PLAT AND ALSO THE EAST 15 FEET OF LOT 38 TGW 39 LESS POR DAF - BEG NE COR SD LOT 39 THENCE WEST 150 FEET THENCE SOUTH 109 FEET THENCE EAST 104 FEET THENCE SELY TO PT ON EAST LN SD LOT 39 DIST 132 FEET SOUTH OF NORTHEAST COR LESS ST IN MEEKERS SUPL PLAT 1ST ADD TO KENT AND ALSO THAT POR SD LOT DAF-BEG NE COR SD LOT THENCE _ WEST 150 FEET THENCE SOUTH 109 FEET THENCE EAST 104 FEET THENCE SELY TO PT ON EAST LN SE LOT 39 DIST 132 FEET SOUTH OF NORTHEAST COR THEREOF THENCE NORTH TO BEG LESS STREET IN LOT 39 IN MEEKERS SUPL PLAT 1ST ADD TO KENT AND ALSO THE EAST 1/2 LOT 37 LESS WEST 10 FEET AND LESS NORTH 10 FEET FOR ST TGW LOT 38 LESS EAST 15 FEET AND LESS NORTH 10 FEET FOR ST IN MEEKERS SUPL PLAT 1ST ADD TO KENT AND ALSO THAT PORTION OF LOT 37 DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THE WEST 1/2 TGW WEST 10 FEET OF EAST 1/2 LESS STREET HWY ALL IN MEEKERS SUPL PLAT 1ST ADD TO KENT AND ALSO THE EAST 90 FEET OF LOT 36 IN MEEKERS SUPL PLAT 1ST ADD TO KENT AND ALSO THE WEST 60 FEET OF LOT 36 IN MEEKERS SUPL PLAT 1ST ADD TO KENT AND ALSO A PORTION OF LOT 35 IN MEEKER'S SUPPLEMENTAL PLAT FIRST ADDITION TO TOWN OF KENT DAF: BEGINNING AT NORTHEAST CORNER OF TRACT DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT 'A' IN INSTRUMENT UNDER RECORDING NO. 9609091262 SAID .-')INT BEING A POINT ON NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 35 THENCE ALONG ELY LINE OF SAID -=ACT FOLLOWING TWO COURSES: SOUTH 00-38-23 WEST 80.05 FEET THENCE SOUTH 04-47-31 WEST 175.90 FEET TO POINT ON SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 35 THENCE NORTH 89-38-02 EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE 95.30 FEET TO SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 35 THENCE NORTH 00-37-37 EAST ALONG EAST LINE THEREOF 255.34 FEET TO NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 35 THENCE SOUTH 89-34-40 WEST ALONG NORTH LINE THEREOF 82.51 FEET TO POINT OF BEGINNING (AKA REVISED PARCEL 'A' AS DESCRIBED AND DELINEATED PER CITY OF KENT LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO LL-96-31 RECORDING NO. 9612161402) AND ALSO THE EAST 71.20 FEET OF LOT 31 & ALL OF LOTS 32, 33, 34 & 35 IN MEEKER'S SUPPLEMENTAL PLAT FIRST ADDITION TO TOWN OF KENT; TGW PORTION PARCEL 1 CITY OF KENT SHORT PLAT NO SP-76-13 RECORDING NO 7701130512 LYING NLY OF FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: COMMENCING AT NE CORNER SAID PARCEL 1 THENCE SOUTH 00-40-32 WEST ALONG EAST LINE THEREOF 354.82 FEET TO TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING THENCE NORTH 89-21-55 WEST 519.00 FEET THENCE. NORTH 02-10-03 EAST 58.31 FEET THENCE NORTH 88-02-35 WEST 229.97 FEET TO EAST MARGIN OF 64TH AVENUE SOUTH &TERMINUS OF LINE; EXCEPT PORTION SAID PARCEL 1 & SAID LOT 35 DAF: BEGINNING AT NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 1 CITY OF KENT SHORT PLAT NO SP-76-13 THENCE SOUTH 00-40-31 WEST ALONG EAST LINE THEREOF 354.82 FEET THENCE NORTH 89-21-55 WEST 29.08 FEET THENCE NORTH 00-37- 26 EAST 354.31 FEET TO SOUTH LINE OF LOT 34 SUPPLEMENTAL PLAT OF MEEKER'S FIRST ADDITION TO TOWN-OF KENTS THENCE NORTH 89-38-02 EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE 2.81 ,FEET TO SOUTHEAST CORNER THEREOF THENCE NORTH 00-37-31 EAST ALONG EAST LINE THEREOF 34.46 FEET THENCE LEAVING SAID EAST LINE NORTH 04-52- 45 EAST 141.98 FEET THENCE NORTH 00-36-39 EAST 79.33 FEET TO NORTH LINE OF LOT 35 OF SAID PLAT THENCE NORTH 89-34-40 EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 139.49 FEET TO EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 35 THENCE SOUTH 00-37-37 WEST ALONG SAID EAST LINE 255.34 FEET TO SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 35 THENCE SOUTH 89-38-02 WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE 123.40 FEET TO NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 1 & TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING (AKA REVISED PARCEL 'B' AS DESCRIBED & DELINEATED PER CITY OF KENT LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO LL-96-31 RECORDING NO 9612161402) EXCEPT PORTION THEREOF CONVEYED TO CITY OF KENT BY DEED UNDER RECORDING NO 9706091555 DAF: BEGINNING AT NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID REVISED PARCEL 'B' THENCE NORTH 89-34-40 EAST ALONG NORTH LINE THEREOF 531.75 FEET TO NORTHEST CORNER OF SAID REVISED PARCEL'B' THENCE SOUTH 00-36-39 WEST ALONG EAST LINE THEREOF 14 FEET THENCE SOUTH 89-34-40 WEST 531.76 FEET TO WEST LINE OF SAID - REVISED PARCEL 'B' THENCE NORTH 00-37-17 EAST ALONG WEST LINE THEREOF 14 FEET TO TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING AND ALSO THE NORTH 250 FEET OF FOLG LOTS 30 LESS WEST 30 FEET & 31 LESS EAST 71.2 FEET LESS ST ALL IN MEEKERS SUPL PLAT 1ST ADD TO KENT END OF DESCRIPTION Kent City Council Meeting Date January 16 , 2001 Category Consent Calendar 1 . SUBJECT: BOWER SHORT PLAT BILL OF SALE - ACCEPT 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works Director, accept the Bill of Sale for the Bower Short Plat submitted by Richard Melchior for continuous operation and maintenance of 82 feet of sanitary sewers, 223 feet of storm sewers, and 128 feet of street improvements and release bonds after the expiration period. The project is located at 25308 113th Avenue S .E. 3 . EXHIBITS• None 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Director (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS : 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 6F Kent City Council Meeting Date January 16 , 2001 Category Consent Calendar 1 . SUBJECT: WOODRIDGE ESTATES BILL OF SALE - ACCEPT 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works Director, accept the Bill of Sale for Woodridge Estates submitted by Morgan Llewellyn for continuous operation and maintenance of 737 feet of watermains, 180 feet of sanitary sewers, 955 feet of storm sewers, and 658 feet of street improvements and release bonds after the expiration period. The project is located at Woodland Way South and S 262nd. 3 . EXHIBITS• None 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Director (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc . ) 5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS : 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 6G Kent City Council Meeting Date January 16 , 2001 Category Consent Calendar 1 . SUBJECT: WILSON APARTMENTS BILL OF SALE - ACCEPT 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works Director, accept the Bill of Sale for Wilson Apartments submitted by Schneider Homes, Inc . for continuous operation and maintenance of 716 feet of watermains, 308 feet of sanitary sewers, 634 feet of storm sewers, and 150 feet of street improvements and release bonds after the expiration period. The project is located at 10227 SE 248th Street . 3 . EXHIBITS• None 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Director (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc . ) S . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 6H Kent City Council Meeting Date January 16, 2001 Category Consent Calendar 1 . SUBJECT: HIGHRIDGE TOWNHOMES BILL OF SALE - ACCEPT 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works Director, accept the Bill of Sale for Highridge Townhomes submitted by Highridge Development, Inc . for continuous operation and maintenance of 218 feet of watermains, 96 feet of sanitary sewers, 218 feet of storm sewers, and 200 feet of street improvements and release bonds after the expiration period. The project is located at 26404 103rd Avenue S .E . 3 . EXHIBITS• None 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Director (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS : 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 6I Kent City Council Meeting Date January 16 , 2001 Category Consent Calendar 1 . SUBJECT: HARRELL SHORT PLAT BILL OF SALE - ACCEPT 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works Director, accept the Bill of Sale for Harrell Short Plat submitted by James R. Harrell, Doris W. Harrell and Robyn S . Harrell for continuous operation and maintenance of 308 feet of sanitary sewers, 165 feet of storm sewers, and release bonds after the expiration period. The project is located at 25322 38th Avenue South. 3 . EXHIBITS• None 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Director (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc . ) S . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS : 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 6J Kent City Council Meeting Date January 16 , 2001 Category Consent Calendar 1 . SUBJECT: TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS BILL OF SALE - ACCEPT 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works Director, accept the Bill of Sale for Tacoma Screw Products submitted by Tacoma Screw Products for con-tinuous operation and maintenance of 20 feet of watermains, 118 feet of storm sewers, and 190 feet of street improvements and release bonds after the expiration period. The project is located at 21821 84th Avenue South. 3 . EXHIBITS• None 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Director (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS : 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 6K Kent City Council Meeting Date January 16, 2001 Category Consent Calendar 1 . SUBJECT: CENTRAL COMMERCE BUILDING PHASE I (A & B) BILL OF SALE - ACCEPT 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works Director, accept the Bill of Sale for Central Commerce Building Phase I submitted by Central Commerce Center, LLC for continuous operation and maintenance of 15 feet of watermains, 17 feet of sanitary sewer, 54 feet of storm sewers, and 258 feet of street improvements and release of bonds after the expiration period. The project is located at 1000 Central Avenue South. 3 . EXHIBITS• None 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Director (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc . ) 5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS : 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 6L Kent City Council Meeting Date January 16 , 2001 Category Consent Calendar 1 . SUBJECT: STONEGATE KNOLLS/HIGHLAND CROSSING BILL OF SALE - ACCEPT 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works Director, accept the Bill of Sale for Stonegate Knolls/Highland Crossing submitted by Centex Homes for continuous operation and maintenance of 2 , 907 feet of watermains, 1 , 851 feet of sanitary sewer, 3 , 330 feet of storm sewers, and 3 , 530 feet of street improvements and release bonds after the expiration period. The project is located at SE 244th Street & 118th Avenue S .E. 3 . EXHIBITS• None 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Director (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS : 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 6M Kent City Council Meeting Date January 16 , 2001 Category Consent Calendar 1 . SUBJECT: WINWARD COVE AT THE LAKES BILL OF SALE - ACCEPT 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works Director, accept the Bill of Sale for Windward Cove submitted by Windward Cove, L.L.C. for continuous operation and maintenance of 1 , 890 feet of watermains, 1, 271 feet of sanitary sewer, and release bonds after the expiration period. The project is located at the southeast corner of Lakeside Blvd & S . 228th Street . 3 . EXHIBITS• None 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Director (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS : 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 6N Kent City Council Meeting Date January 16 , 2001 Category Consent Calendar 1 . SUBJECT: BAYBERRY CREST BILL OF SALE - ACCEPT 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works Director, accept the Bill of Sale for Bayberry Crest submitted by Bayberry Crest, L.L.C. for continuous operation and maintenance of 1, 681 . 50 feet of street improvements and 4 , 013 feet of storm sewers and release bonds after the expiration period. The project is at located SE 256th Street & 129th Avenue S .E. 3 . EXHIBITS• None 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Director (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc . ) 5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS : 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 60 Kent City Council Meeting Date January 16 , 2001 Category Consent Calendar 1 . SUBJECT: BENSON HIGHLANDS BILL OF SALE - ACCEPT 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works Director, accept the Bill of Sale for Benson Highlands submitted by RKL Construction, L.L.C. for continuous operation and maintenance of 735 feet of watermains, 1, 100 feet of sanitary sewers, 550 feet of storm sewers and 466 feet of street improvements and release bonds after the expiration period. The project is located at SE 244th Street & 114th Avenue S .E. 3 . EXHIBITS• None 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Director (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc . ) 5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 6P Kent City Council Meeting Date January 16 , 2001 Category Consent Calendar 1 . SUBJECT: 118TH AVENUE SE SANITARY SEWER EXTENSION CHARGE IN LIEU OF ASSESSMENT - AUTHORIZE 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works Committee, authorization for the Public Works Director to establish a charge in lieu of assessment for the recently constructed 118th Ave SE Sanitary Sewer Extension project, for the total amount of $40 , 000 . 3 . EXHIBITS: Public Works Director memorandum 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc . ) 5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS : 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 6Q DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM December 13, 2000 TO: Public Works Co mmi ee FROM: Don Wickstrom RE: 118th Avenue SE - Sanitary Sewer Extension (Southerly to the SE 280th Street Intersection) Charge in Lieu of Assessment The Department of Public Works requests the approval for establishment of a charge in lieu of assessment for the recently constructed I I8th Avenue SE - Sanitary Sewer Extension project. The location of the sewer main and the properties affected by the charge are shown on Attachment A with their legal descriptions provided in Attachment B. The total construction cost for the project is $50,262.50. The total amount to be collected is $40,000 ($10,000 from each property) with the remaining balance of$10,262.50 to be paid by the City. ACTION REQUESTED: Authorize the Public Works Department to establish a charge in lieu of assessment for the total amount of$40,000 distributed to the affected properties. Enclosure Cc: Merrill Vesper Alex Murillo Frank Grewell NDW00002 ATTACHMENT B LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF FUTURE CUSTOMERS 1. Lot 3 of King County Short Plat 577049 Recording No. 7712270744 lying within the northwest quarter of Section 33 Township 22 North Range 5 East 2. Lot 4 of King County Short Plat 577049 Recording No. 7712270744 lying within the northwest quarter of Section 33 Township 22 North Range 5 East 3. Lot 1 of King County Short Plat 677032 Recording No. 7812121098 lying within the southwest quarter of Section 33 Township 22 North Range 5 East 4. The east half of the north half of the north half of the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of the southwest quarter lying within Section 33 Township 22 North Range 5 East (King County, WA). NDW00002 ❑ ❑ SE 277th PLACE ---------------=-6 EXISTING 8" SEWER I i , 0 I I O�< TEE NEW 8 SEWER APPROX. 370 LF ; TEE �o STUB / 2 / SE 280th STREET KENTSCITY LIMITS (hI W ❑� ❑ :/"'IG COUNTY L� N d LAJ - — n — — `t� � W Q ❑ ocz] C', LL t SE 282nd STREET � CITY OF KENT ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 1181h AVENUE SE ATTACHMENT A KENT SANITARY SEWER MAIN EXTENSION .•••... °• CHARGE IN LIEU OF ASSESSMENT LOCATIONS OF FUTURE CUSTOMERS SCALE I•.ioa oAIE Iz-Iz-oo 00t/2[2 t6mp,ssassd\sjawwoo alel\o[0£-00\9M0\ ,9 Kent City Council Meeting Date January 16 , 2001 Category Consent Calendar 1 . SUBJECT: VEHICULAR SPEED LIMITS RESOLUTION - PASS 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works Committee, passage of Resolution No. relating to vehicular speed limits within the City limits of Kent . 3 . EXHIBITS: Resolution and Public Works Director memorandum 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc . ) 5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS : 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 6R RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, relating to vehicular speed limits on certain designated streets, as posted by official traffic control devices, pursuant to Chapter 9.40 of the Kent City Code. WHEREAS, the Kent Traffic Code, Section 9.36.010, adopts by reference the Model Traffic Ordinance set forth in Washington Administrative Code in Chapter 308-330 WAC (Ordinance 3170); and WHEREAS,provisions of the Model Traffic Ordinance, Washington Administrative Code Section 308-330-270 and RCW 46.61.415, set forth the procedure for the local authority to determine and declare the speed limits on city arterials, streets and other rights of way, after an engineering and traffic investigation by the traffic engineer; and WHEREAS,pursuant to the Model Traffic Ordinance, Chapter 9.40 of the Kent City Code was adopted to provide that the City may establish speed limits on certain designated streets by resolution; and WHEREAS, a list of the speed limits on certain designated streets in the City has been properly made and adopted by Resolution No. 1406; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to update and amend the list of speed limits set forth in Resolution No. 1406; NOW, THEREFORE, 1 Vehicular Speed Limits THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I: The speed limits and provisions of Resolution No. 1406 are hereby re- adopted with amendments as noted in this resolution to read as follows: Increasing or Decreasing Speed Limits on Certain Streets, Highways or other Rights- of-Way It is determined, on the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation, that the speed permitted by state law upon the following streets or portion thereof is less than, or in some cases, more than that necessary for safe operation of vehicles, either because of(1)the designation and sign posting of these streets as arterial highways; (2) the existence of widely spaced intersections; or(3) the increased traffic on these streets as disclosed by traffic studies. It is hereby declared that the speed limits on such streets shall be as hereinafter set forth on the streets or portions of same listed, at all times, unless otherwise specified, after official traffic control devices have been posted to give notice thereof, provided, that in no case shall the speed limit on City streets exceed fifty-five (55) miles per hour. Name of street or portions affected Speed limit 1. Pacific Highway South (SR 99) from the intersection 45 mph of South 272"d Street to the intersection of Kent-Des Moines Road(SR 516) 2. Military Road from the intersection of South 229`h 35 mph Street to the intersection of South 250`h Street 3. Military Road from the intersection of South 250`h 40 mph Street to the intersection of South 272"d Street 4. Reith Road/South 259`h Place/South 2601h Place from 35 mph the intersection of Kent-Des Moines Road(SR 516)to the intersection of Pacific Highway South (SR 99) 5. Lake Fenwick Road from the intersection of Reith 35 mph Road to the intersection of South 272"d Street 2 Vehicular Speed Limits 6. South 1961h/Russell Road/South 200`h Street from the 35 mph intersection of 84d'Avenue South to the intersection of Orillia Road 7. 641h Avenue South from Meeker Street to South 212`h 35 mph Street 8. West Valley Highway from the intersection of South 50 mph 180`h Street to 830 feet North of the Intersection of Morton Street (South 238`h Street) 9. West Valley Highway from the intersection of Morton 35 mph Street(South 238'h Street)to the intersection of Frager Road 10. West Valley Highway from the intersection of Frager 40 mph Road to a point 180 feet North of the intersection of South 262nd Street 11. West Valley Highway from a point 180 feet north of 50 mph South 262nd Street to the intersection of South 272"d Street 12. 84`h Avenue South from the intersection of South 180 40 mph Street to the intersection of SR 167 13. Central Avenue North from the intersection of SR 167 35 mph to the intersection of James Street 14. Central Avenue North from the intersection of James 30 mph Street to the intersection of Willis Street 15. Central Avenue South from the intersection of Willis 40 mph Street to the Green River Bridge 16. 74`h Avenue South from the intersection of SR 516 to 35 mph the intersection of South 2591h Street 17. 72"d Avenue South from the intersection of South 35 mph 262nd Street to the intersection of South 2771' Street 18. 4`h Avenue North from the intersection of South 228`h 35 mph Street to the overpass for SR 167 19. 76"'Avenue South from the intersection of South 212`h 35 mph Street to the intersection of South 228`h Street 3 Vehicular Speed Limits 20. 4'h Avenue North from the overpass for SR 167 to the 30 mph intersection of Willis Street 21. 80`h Place South from the intersection of 801h Avenue 35 mph South to the intersection of 84`h Avenue South (190`h Street) 22. 92nd Avenue South from the intersection of South 35 mph 208`h Street to the intersection of South 2001h Street. 23. 104`h Avenue Southeast from a point 100 feet north of 35 mph the intersection of Southeast 236`h Street to the intersection of Southeast 272nd Street 24. Kent-Des Moines Road (SR 516) eastbound from a 35 mph point 50 feet west of the intersection of 27`h Avenue South to the intersection of 30`h Avenue South 25. Meeker Street from Kent-Des Moines Road (SR 516) 40 mph to a point 500 feet west of the intersection of West Valley Highway(Washington Avenue) 26. Meeker Street from a point 500 feet west of the 30 mph intersection of West Valley Highway (Washington Avenue) to the intersection of 6`h Avenue 27. Smith Street(SR 516) from the intersection of Lincoln 30 mph Avenue to the intersection of Central Avenue North 28. Canyon Drive (SR 516) from the intersection of Hazel 40 mph Avenue to the intersection of 100'h Place Southeast 29. Southeast 256`h Street from the intersection of 100`h 35 mph Place Southeast to the intersection of 148`h Avenue Southeast 30. Kent-Kangley Road(SR 516) from the intersection of 35 mph Southeast 256`h Street to the intersection of 116`h Avenue Southeast 31. Willis Street (SR 516) from the intersection of 4`h 30 mph Avenue to the intersection of Central Avenue South 32. 97`h Place South from the intersection of Canyon 30 mph Drive (SR 516) to the intersection of 100`h Place Southeast 4 Vehicular Speed Limits 33. Southeast 264`h Street from the intersection of 100'h 35 mph Place Southeast to the intersection of 108`' Avenue Southeast 34. South 228'h Street from the intersection of 54'h Avenue 35 mph South to the intersection of West Valley Highway (68'k' Avenue South) (SR 181) 35. South 228'h/83rd Avenue South/South 224`h Street 40 mph from the intersection of West Valley Highway (68'h Avenue South) (SR 181) to the intersection of 84`h Avenue South 36. South 212'h Street from the west city limits to the east 40 mph city limits 37. South 208'h Street from the intersection of 84`h Avenue 35 mph South to the intersection of 92"d Avenue South 38. 116'h Avenue Southeast from the intersection of 35 mph Southeast 227`' Place to the intersection of Kent- Kangley Road (SR 516) 39. 116`h Avenue Southeast from the intersection of Kent- 40 mph Kangley Road (SR 516) to the overpass for 108`h Avenue Southeast 40. Southeast 248`h Street from the intersection of 94`h 35 mph Avenue South to the intersection of 132 Avenue Southeast 41. Southeast 277'h Street from the overpass for 108'h 50 mph Avenue Southeast to the intersection of 86th Avenue South 42. Reiten Road from Titus Street to Maple Street 30 mph 43. Maple Street from Reiten Road to Tilden Avenue 30 mph 44. Woodland Way South from Tilden Avenue to the 30 mph intersection of Southeast 267'h Street 45. Southeast 267`h Street from the intersection of 30 mph Woodland Way to the intersection of 104'h Avenue Southeast 5 Vehicular Speed Limits 46. 77`h Avenue South from the intersection of South 212`h 35 mph Street to the north end of the road 47. James Street/Southeast 240'h Street from the inter- 35 mph section of Russell Road to the intersection of 116`h Avenue Southeast 48. Southeast 240d' Street from the intersection of 116`h 40 mph Avenue Southeast to the intersection of 137`h Avenue Southeast 49. Southeast 2401h Street from the intersection of 137`h 35 mph Avenue Southeast to the intersection of 148`h Avenue Southeast 50. South 190'h Street from the intersection of 72"d 35 mph Avenue South to the intersection of 62"d Avenue South 51. South 277'h Street from the intersection of 86`h Avenue 40 mph South to the intersection of Auburn Way North 52. South 194`h Street from the intersection of 66`h Avenue 35 mph South to the intersection of Russell Road/50' Place South 53. 70'h/72"d Avenue South from the intersection of South 35 mph 2281h Street to the intersection of South 180`h Street 54. South 216`h Street from the intersection of 64`h Avenue 35 mph South to the intersection of 72"d Avenue South 55. South 220`h Street from the intersection of West 35 mph Valley Highway (68`h Avenue South) (SR 181) to the intersection of 72"d Avenue South 56. 80`h Avenue South from the intersection of South 180`h 35 mph Street to the intersection of South 196`h Street 57. Southeast 260`h Street from the intersection of 97`h 35 mph Place South to the intersection of 108`h Avenue Southeast 58. 101st Avenue Southeast from the intersection of 30 mph Southeast 256`h Street (SR 516)to the intersection of Southeast 2601h Street 6 Vehicular Speed Limits 59. 108`h Avenue Southeast from the intersection of Kent- 35 mph Kangley Road (SR 516) to the south city limits 60. Kent-Kangley Road (SR 516) (Southeast 272"d Street) 45 mph from the intersection of 116d'Avenue Southeast to the overpass for SR 18 61. 114d' Avenue Southeast southbound from the 35 mph intersection of Kent-Kangley Road (SR 516) to the intersection of Southeast 267`h Court 62. 120`h Avenue Southeast from the intersection of 35 mph Southeast 240`h Street to the intersection of Southeast 2481h Street 63. 1241h Avenue Southeast from the intersection of 35 mph Southeast 248`h Street to the intersection of Southeast 282"d Street 64. 132"d Avenue Southeast from the intersection of 35 mph Southeast 240`h Street to the intersection of Southeast 282"d Street 65. 144`h Avenue Southeast from the intersection of Kent- 35 mph Kangley Road (SR 516) to the intersection of Southeast 288`h Street 66. 152"d Avenue Southeast from the intersection of Kent- 35 mph Kangley Road (SR 516) to the south city limits 67. South 272"d Street from the intersection of Pacific 35 mph Highway South(SR 99) to the intersection of Military Road 68. South 240`h Street from the intersection on Pacific 35 mph Highway South (SR 99) to the west city limits 69. 148`h Avenue Southeast from the intersection of 35 mph Southeast 256`h Street to the intersection of Southeast 240`h Street 70. Southeast 248`h Street from the intersection of 94`h 35 mph Avenue South to the intersection of 132"d Avenue South 7 Vehicular Speed Limits 71. Smith Street from the intersection of Central Avenue 30 mph North to the intersection of Hazel Avenue 72. 42"d Avenue South from the intersection of 216`h 35 mph Street to the intersection of South 212`h Street 73. Green River Road from the north city limits north of 35 mph the Green River(Don Wickstrom) Bridge to the south city limits SECTION 2. The City Traffic Engineer shall take whatever steps are necessary to comply with all statutory directives regarding approval of the state of these speed limits, posting of official traffic control devices and the regulation of timing of traffic signals, as set forth in the Model Traffic Ordinance, adopted by reference pursuant to Section 9.36.010 of the Kent City Code, more specifically, Section 308-330-270 of the Washington Administrative Code, RCW 46.61.415, and all other applicable sections of the Model Traffic Ordinance. SECTION 3. Resolution No. 1406 is hereby repealed. SECTION 4. This Resolution shall take effect and be in force immediately upon its passage as provided by law. PASSED at a regular open public meeting by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, this day of 2000. CONCURRED in by the Mayor of the City of Kent this day of , 2000. JIM WHITE,MAYOR 8 Vehicular Speed Limits ATTEST: BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: ROGER A. LUBOVICH, CITY ATTORNEY I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of Resolution No. passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, the day of 2000. BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK P%Ci"MnolutionlSPEEDLIM.RFS120500.dm 9 Vehicular Speed Limits DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM December 5, 2000 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Don Wicks trom, Public Works Director RE: Speed Limit on S. 277`h Street Corridor After opening the corridor and allowing for the motoring public to adjust to the new route, we conducted several samplings of speed on the corridor. Accordingly, we will be changing the speed limit on the portion of the corridor that is designed to accommodate the suggested 50 mph speed limit. The 85`h percentile speed consistently support the recommended changes. From the 108`h Ave SE ramps westerly to approximately D Street NE in Auburn, the speed limit will be changed to 50 mph. From the ramps easterly, then northerly to the Kent Kangley Road, the speed limit will be 40 mph due to design speed limitations in the curves and the entering sight distance limitations from several entry points. This change will be incorporated into an Ordinance to be presented to the City Council on January 2, 2001. Most of the changes in the Ordinance are more `housekeeping" in nature, with only the changes on the corridor being substantive. The resolution has been undergoing legal review to consolidate all the corrections for a couple months and it was determined that the speed limit change could be adopted with the other changes. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS January 8, 2001 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Don Wickstrom, Public Works Director SUBJECT: Vehicular Speed Limits - Resolution The attached Resolution relates to vehicular speed limits on certain designated streets . It is the Public Works Department' s request that Committee recommends adopting the Resolution to update existing Resolution #1406 to include these changes . MOTION: Recommend adopting Resolution # relating to vehicular speed limits within the City limits of Kent . speed �� ®a Kent City Council Meeting Date January 16 , 2001 Category Consent Calendar 1 . SUBJECT: S . 196TH STREET/RUSSELL ROAD IMPROVEMENTS - ACCEPT AS COMPLETE 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works Committee, accept the S . 196th Street/Russell Road Improvements contract as complete and release retainage to Scarsella Brothers upon standard releases from the State and release of any liens . The original contract amount was $2 , 491, 790 . 16 . The final contract amount was $3 , 053 , 340 . 57 . Adequate funds exist within the project budget to cover this overage. 3 . EXHIBITS: Public Works Director memorandum 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc . ) S . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 6S DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS January 8, 2001 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Don Wickstrom, Public Works Directorpw. SUBJECT: S. 196th/Russell Road Improvements - Acceptance The S . 196th/Russell Road Improvements contract was awarded to Scarsella Brothers on July 7, 1998 in the amount of $2 , 491, 790 . 16 . The final contract amount was $3 , 053 , 340 . 57 . The reason for the overage is as follows. Originally the roadway improvement from a two-lane road to five lanes included leaving the existing road in place. The additional lanes to the south of the existing road would be constructed and then the entire new road overlayed with 2" of asphalt concrete pavement . Overlaying the road rather than replacing the existing two lanes was not the ideal situation, but was decided upon as an alternative due to budget constraints . However, because of the lower contract bid, we were able to remove the entire existing two lane roadway and replace it with a thicker section to match the south side of the five lane road. The overage, therefore, consisted of the asphalt, roadway excavation and base materials . This assures us of a longer lasting road for the entire five lanes . Adequate funds exist within the project budget to cover this overage. MOTION: Recommend to full Council acceptance of the project as complete. MP2076 Kent City Council Meeting Date _ January 16 , 2001 Category Consent Calendar 1 . SUBJECT: COORDINATED PREVENTION GRANT NO. G0000139, AMENDMENT NO. 1 - ACCEPT 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works Committee, authorization for the Mayor to sign Amendment No. 1 to Ecology Grant No. G0000139, direct staff to accept the grant in the amount of $19, 058 and establish a budget for same . 3 . EXHIBITS: Amendment No. 1 (#G0000139) and Public Works Director memorandum 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc . ) 5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS : 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 6T Amendment No. I to Ecology Grant No. G0000139 — Agreement with City of Kent AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO ECOLOGY GRANT NO. G0000139 BETWEEN STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY AND CITY OF KENT RECIPIENT ADDRESS 220 4'h Ave S Kent WA 98032-5895 RECIPIENT REPRESENTATIVE Robyn Bartelt, Conservation Specialist City of Kent Public Works Department RECIPIENT PROJECT COORDINATOR Robyn Bartelt TELEPHONE (253)856-5549 FAX (253) 856-6500 E-MAIL rbartelt@ci.kent.wa.us REGIONAL PROJECT OFFICER Steven Williams TELEPHONE (425)649-7048 FAX (425) 649-7098 E-MAIL stwi461@ecy.wa.gov _FUNDING SOURCE Local Toxics Control Account GRANT AMOUNT THIS AMENDMENT $19,058 MAXIMUM ELIGIBLE COST $168,857 STATE GRANT SHARE $101,314 LOCAL SHARE $67,543 STATE MAXIMUM GRANT PERCENT 60% FEDERAL TAX IDENTIFICATION NO. 91-6001254 PURPOSE: To amend the above-referenced grant agreement between the Department of Ecology (DEPARTMENT)and the City of Kent(RECIPIENT). This effective date of this amendment is October 1, 2000. This agreement shall expire no later than December 31, 2001. I of 4 Amendment No. Ito Ecology Grant No. G0000139 Agreement with City of Kent IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED that the grant agreement is amended as follows: A. 2. PROJECT TASK: (WRRC-3) COMPOST BIN DISTRIBUTION The cost of this task is increased by$31,763,the state funding for this task is increased by $19,058. The existing maximum eligible cost, goal statement, project description, and expected outcomes are hereby deleted and replaced with the following. Maximum Eligible Cost: $62,017 Schedule: January 1,2000 through December 31, 2001 Goal Statement: The goal of this project is to increase waste reduction and recycling in the City of Kent by providing the means for residents to purchase low-cost compost bins to recycle and reuse compostable yard debris at their residence. The program shall provide an alternative to, or complement curbside collection of yard debris and grasscycling. Project Description: The RECIPIENT shall conduct four compost bin distribution events. The events will take place each spring and fall of this grant cycle. Promotional advertising shall occur prior to the events. A combined total of 1,140 compost bins will be distributed at the four events. The RECIPIENT shall provide educational materials at each event, including a"home composting wheel' demonstrating proper use of the bins,Natural Lawn Care booklets, and grasscycling brochures. A King County Master Composter shall be at each event to provide on-site demonstrations on recycling yard waste and gardening with compost. Composting videos shall be made available for checkout from the library and the Public Works Department. The RECIPIENT shall conduct a survey of residents who purchased the bins to evaluate how effectively they are working. A copy of the findings shall be submitted to the DEPARTMENT. In accordance with Administrative Requirements for Ecology Grants and Loans, WDOE 91-18 (Revised July 1995), if the RECIPIENT charges residents a fee for the compost bins, the income received from the sale of the bins shall be listed as a credit on voucher support Form C2 when requesting reimbursement from the DEPARTMENT, The 60%state share of the grant funds shall be applied to net costs after deducting the project income. Expected Outcomes/Imnacts: Previous bin distribution events have indicated a 90%usage rate by participants that purchased the bins. Based on this figure the RECIPIENT expects that successful distribution and use of 1,140 compost bins, at the estimated annual waste prevention per household of 600 pounds,will divert 307 tons of yard waste 2 of 4 Amendment No. Ito Ecology Grant No. G0000139 —Agreement with City of Kent from entering the landfill. This yard waste diversion will assist the RECIPIENT in reaching its 65% waste reduction and recycling goal. B. The existing CPG BUDGET, FUND SOURCE, and ADDITIONAL BUDGET CONDITIONS are hereby deleted and replaced with the following, which increases the total maximum eligible cost by $31,763 from $137,094 to a new total of$168,857. The DEPARTMENT share is increased by$19,058 from $82,256 to a new total of$101,314. CPG BUDGET PROJECT TASK MAXIMUM ELIGIBLE COST 1. Recycling Coordinator/Program Administration(WRRA-2) $106,840 2. Compost Bin Distribution(WRRC-3) $62,017 TOTAL $168,857 FUND SOURCE Total Eligible Cost $168,857 FUND FUND SHARE (%) MAXIMUM FUND AMOUNT Local Toxics Control Account(LTCA) 60% $101,314 MATCH REQUIREMENT MATCH SHARE (%) MATCH AMOUNT Cash Match or Interlocal Costs 40% $67,543 ADDITIONAL BUDGET CONDITIONS 1. Overhead is eligible;the RECIPIENT may charge 25 percent of the RECIPIENT salaries and benefits applied directly to the project as overhead. 2. Interlocal costs are eligible; other in-kind contributions are not eligible. 3. The fiscal office will monitor expenditures at the task level. A letter amendment is required to redistribute costs among tasks. A formal amendment is required to increase state funding. 4. The maximum allowable amount from the LTCA is $101,314. 5. All remaining costs will be paid by cash match and interlocal costs. 3 of 4 Amendment No. I to Ecology Grant No. G0000139 Agreement with City of Kent Except as expressly provided by this amendment,all other terms and conditions of the original grant agreement and any amendments thereto remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereby execute this Grant: STATE OF WASHINGTON CITY OF KENT DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Cullen D. Stephenson Date Jim White Date Program Manager Mayor Solid Waste and Financial Assistance APPROVED AS TO FORM: Kent City Attorney ATTEST: Approved as to form only by Assistant Attorney General City Clerk 4of4 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS January 8, 2001 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Don Wickstrom, Public Works Director, `• L • SUBJECT: Coordinated Prevention Grant No. G0000139 Amendment No. 1 The Public Works Department is in receipt of Amendment #1 to Ecology Grant No. G0000139 between the City and the Dept of Ecology. The Grant Amendment is in the amount of $19, 058 . At this time, we are requesting Committee' s recommendation to accept the grant and establish a fund for same . MOTION: Recommend authorization for the Mayor to sign Amendment No. 1 to Ecology Grant No. G0000139, direct staff to accept the grant amendment and establish a budget for same. grantamendment Kent City Council Meeting Date January 16 , 2001 Category Consent Calendar 1 . SUBJECT: VOICESTREAM LEASE AGREEMENT - AUTHORIZE 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Authorization to enter into an agreement with VoiceStream PCS III Corporation to lease a portion of the Centennial Office Building. VoiceStream PCS III Corporation wishes to lease a portion of the roof and a portion of the interior space of the Centennial Office Building commencing March 1, 2001 and ending March 1, 2006 . As outlined in the attached agreement, VoiceStream wants to place nine (9) antennas, related cabling and other related equipment on the building for a monthly fee of $1250 . 00 . 3 . EXHIBITS: Lease Agreement and Exhibits A-C 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Staff and parks Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc . ) S . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES X 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: None SOURCE OF FUNDS : Revenue of $1250 . 00 per month 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: , Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 6U LEASE AGREEMENT THIS LEASE AGREEMENT is entered into by and between the CITY OF KENT, Washington municipal corporation("Landlord") and VOICESTREAM PCS III CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, with its principal office located at 3650 - 131st Avenue SE (Suite 200), Bellevue, WA 98006 ("Tenant"). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Landlord is the owner of the property located at 400 W. Gowe, in the City of Kent, Washington, legally described in Exhibit"A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, Tenant desires to lease from Landlord, and Landlord desires to lease to Tenant, a portion of the roof and a portion of the interior space(collectively, the"Premises") of the building located on the Property (the "Building") from Landlord, pursuant to the provisions stated in this Lease. The Premises are more fully described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference; and WHEREAS, Tenant desires to use the Premises for purposes of placing up to nine (9) VoiceStream PCS III Corporation antennas, related cabling and other related equipment described in Exhibit "C" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Communication Equipment"); NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual intent and desires described above, and of the terms, covenants, and conditions hereinafter set forth, Landlord hereby leases to Tenant the Premises as hereinafter described for the term of this Lease, and subject to and upon all the terms, covenants, and agreements set forth in this Lease: 1. Lease Term and Commencement Date: Replacement of License. This Lease shall commence on March 1, 2001 (the "Commencement Date"), and end on March 1, 2006. Additionally, Tenant shall have the option to renew this lease for three (3) additional five (5) year periods with the same covenants and conditions set forth herein. This Lease shall extend for each Renewal Term if Tenant provides written notice to Landlord of its intent to renew this Lease at least 120 days prior to the commencement of the successive Renewal Term. Upon expiration of the Lease, the terms, covenants, and conditions of this Lease shall terminate, unless specifically stated to survive termination. LEASE AGREEMENT- 1 (Landlord. City of Kent;Tenant. VOICESTREAM PCS111 CORPOW70M) (December 13.1000) 2. Monthly Rent and Security Deposit. A. Monthly Rent. (1) Tenant agrees to pay Landlord as Monthly Rent,without notice or demand,the sum of ONE THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED FIFTY AND NO/100 DOLLARS (S1,250.00) ("Monthly Rent"); plus leasehold tax at a rate established by the State of Washington, (currently 12.84%).commencing on the Commencement Date. The Monthly Rent shall be paid in advance,on or before the first day of the first full calendar month of the term hereof and a like sum on or before the first date of each and every successive calendar month thereafter during the term hereof. The leasehold tax can be paid in conjunction with the Monthly Rent or once a year in a lump sum directly to the State of Washington. (2) Tenant shall pay Landlord a late payment charge equal to five percent (5%)of the late payment for any payment not paid within five (5)calendar days of when due. Any arnounts not paid when due shall bear interest until paid at the rate of one and a half percent (1.5%) per month. (3) For each additional antenna installed by Tenant beyond the initial array described in Exhibit C,Tenant shall pay an additional annual fee in an amount to be determined by the parties, which shall increase annually under the same terms provided in this Lease and shall become part of the Base Rent. (4) The Monthly Rent shall be increased effective as of the beginning of each Renewal Term by an amount equal to twenty percent (20%) of the Monthly Rent paid during the preceding term. (5) If this Lease is terminated at a time other than on the last day of the month, Rent shall be prorated as of the date of termination and, in the event of termination for any reason other than nonpayment of Rent, all prepaid Rents shall be refunded to the Tenant. (6) Monthly Rent,and all other consideration to be paid or provided by Tenant to Landlord shall constitute Rent and shall be paid or provided without offset. B. Security Deposit. At the time of execution of this Lease,Tenant shall deposit with Landlord an amount equal to one month's rent. Should Tenant fully perform all of its obligations hereunder, the Security Deposit shall be returned to Tenant upon the expiration of the Term or Renewal Term, as the case may be. 3. Location of the Communication Equipment. The location of the Communication Equipment on the Premises shall be as shown on Exhibit "B" hereto.. In the event that Tenant desires to move the Communication Equipment to a different place on the Premises, new plans LEASE AGREEMENT-2 (Landlord: City of Kent; Tenant: YOICESTREAM PCs 111 CORPORATION) (Decembr 21.:000) 4. Screening of Communication Equipment. Landlord may, if necessary, require that Tenant screen or relocate the Communication Equipment located on the Building from public view to Landlord's specifications, so long as the functionality of the communication equipment is maintained, in which event the costs thereof shall be borne by Tenant. 5. Equipment Upgrade. Tenant may update or replace the Communication Equipment from time to time with the prior written approval of Landlord, provided that the replacement facilities are not greater in number or size than the existing facilities and that any change in their location on the Premises is approved in writing by Landlord. Tenant shall submit to Landlord a detailed proposal for any such replacement facilities and any supplemental materials as may be requested for Landlord's evaluation and approval. 6. Removal of Communication Equipment. The Communication Equipment is and shall remain the property of the Tenant, and upon the expiration or earlier termination of this Lease, Tenant shall, at Tenant's sole cost and expense,remove the Communication Equipment and restore the Premises to its original condition, normal wear and tear excepted. Attachment holes shall be patched and restored to previous condition. 7. Indemnity. Tenant shall defend, indemnify, and hold the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers harmless from any and all claims. injuries, damages, losses or suits, including all legal costs and attorney's fees, arising out of or in connection with the performance of this Lease, except for injuries and damages caused by the City's negligence. Tenant waives all claims against Landlord for damage to persons or Communication Equipment or property arising from any reason other than a claim based on Landlord's sole negligence or willful misconduct. Landlord shall have no liability to Tenant for any interruption of utility service or for any theft of equipment. 8. Insurance. The Tenant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Lease, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to propem,which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Tenant, its agents, representatives, employees, sub-consultants or sub-contractors. Before beginning work onythe project described in this Lease, the Tenant shall provide a Certificate of Insurance evidencing: A. Automobile Liability insurance with limits no less than$1,000,000 combined single limit per accident for bodily injury and property damage; and B. Commercial General Liability insurance written on an occurrence basis with limits no less than $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence and $2,000,000 aggregate for personal injury,bodily injury and property damage. Coverage shall include but not be limited to: blanket contractual; LEASE AGREEMENT-3 (Landlord: City of Kent. Tenant: VOICESTREAM PCS III CORPORATION) (December 13.2000) products/completed operations broad form property damage; explosion, collapse and underground (XCL-) if applicable; and employer's liability; and Any payment of deductible or self-insured retention shall be the sole responsibility of the Tenant. The City shall be named as an additional insured on the Commercial General Liability insurance policy, as respects work performed by or on behalf of the Tenant and a copy of the endorsement naming the City as additional insured shall be attached to the Certificate of Insurance. The City reserves the right to receive a certified copy of all the required insurance policies. The Tenant's Commercial General Liability insurance shall contain a clause stating that coverage shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respects to the limits of the insurer's liability. The Tenant's insurance shall be primary insurance as respects the City and the City shall be given thirty(30) days prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, of any cancellation, suspension or material change in coverage. 9. Compliance with Laws. Tenant shall. at Tenant's sole cost and expense, install, operate, maintain, and remove the Communication Equipment in accordance with all applicable government laws, rules, regulations, codes, and ordinances (collectively, the "Laws"), and shall obtain all necessary FCC, FAA, and other governmental licenses, permits, and approvals (collectively, the "Approval") required to install, operate, maintain, and remove the Communication Equipment. Landlord shall provide Tenant with such reasonable assistance as is necessary to comply with all applicable Laws and to obtain all necessary Approvals; provided, that all costs associated with such reasonable assistance shall be borne by Tenant. 10. Utilities. Tenant shall be entitled to install and shall pay for the initial installation of any utilities and services required for the Communication Equipment. Tenant shall directly pay for telephone service to the telephone utility. Landlord shall provide Tenant with electricity for the Communication Equipment at the Building. Tenant shall, at its own expense, separately meter charges for the consumption of electricity and other utilities associated with its use and shall timely pay all costs associated therewith. Landlord shall pro,,ide Tenant with such reasonable assistance as is necessary to enable Tenant to arrange such utilities and services; provided, that all costs associated with such reasonable assistance shall be borne by Tenant. Landlord and Tenant agree to make reasonable adjustments to the monthly electrical reimbursement amount from time to time(but not more often than once per calendar year) if any material change should occur in either the estimated electrical consumption of the Communication Equipment or utility rates applicable to Landlord in the Building. LEASE AGREEMENT-4 (Landlord: City of Kent;Tenant: VOIC£STR£AM PCS Ill CORPORaT10.'.) (December 13,1000) 11. Maintenance. A. Tenant shall, at its own expense, maintain the Premises and any equipment on or attached to the Premises in a safe condition, in good repair and in a manner suitable to Landlord so as not to conflict with the use of or other leasing of the Premises by Landlord. Tenant shall not interfere with the use of the Premises, the Building, related facilities, or other equipment of other tenants. B. Tenant shall have sole responsibility for the maintenance, repair, and security of its equipment,personal property, Antennae Facilities, and leasehold improvements, and shall keep the same in good repai- and condition during the Lease term. C. Tenant shall keep the Premises free of debris and anything of a dangerous, noxious or offensive nature or which would create a hazard or undue vibration, heat, noise, or interference. D. In the event the Landlord or any other tenant undertakes painting, construction or other alterations on the Premises,Tenant shall take reasonable measures at Tenant's cost to cover Tenant's equipment,pe.sonal property,or Antennae Facilities and protect such from paint and debris fallout which may occur during the painting, construction, or alteration process. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Landlord shall give Tenant thirty (30) days' notice prior to commencement of such painting, construction, or other alterations, except in an emergency. 12. Premises Access. A. Tenant. at all times during this Lease, shall have vehicle ingress and egress over the Premises by means of the existing driveway over the Owned Premises subject to notice requirements to Landlord in 12(B)below. B. Tenant shall have reasonable access to the Premises over the driveway described above in order to install, operate, and maintain its Communication Equipment. Tenant shall have access to such facilities weekdays during normal working hours, except in the event of an emergency, for which Tenant shall have access 24-hours-a-day,7-days-a-week.Tenant is required to install and shall pay for the installation of a lock box to gain access to the Premises. C. Landlord shall be allowed and granted access to the Premises at reasonable times to examine and inspect the Premises for safety reasons or to ensure that the Tenant's covenants are being met; provided, Landlord shall not disturb Tenant's Communication Equipment during such inspections and examinations. 13. License Fees. Tenant shall.pay, as they become due and payable, all fees, charges, taxes, and expenses required for licenses and/or permits required for or occasioned by Tenant's use of the Premises. LEASE AGREEMENT- (Landlord: City of Kent:Tenant. YOICES' ElAfPCSIIICORPORATION) (December13.2000) 14. Non-Interference. A. The Communication Equipment and the use thereof shall not interfere with the use of any other communication or similar equipment of any kind and nature owned or operated by Landlord or other occupants in the Building; provided, however, that subsequent to the installation by Tenant of the Communication Equipment, Landlord agrees not to allow installation of new equipment on the Premises if such equipment causes interference with Tenant's operations. B. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Landlord shall be entitled to install any Communication Equipment on the Building for its own use. Should any such equipment interfere with the Communication Equipment, the Communication Equipment shall be relocated to a mutually agreeable alternate location at Landlord's expense. If no such alternate location is available, either parry may terminate this Lease and Landlord shall: (i) issue Tenant an appropriate pro rata refund of its prepaid license fee; and (ii) pay the cost of relocation of the Communication Equipment. C. Tenant's installation, operation, and maintenance of its Communication Equipment shall not damage or interfere in any way with Landlord's operations or related repair and maintenance activities or with such activities of other pre-existing tenants. Tenant agrees to cease all such actions that materially interfere with Landlord's use of the Premises immediately upon actual novice of such interference; provided, however, in such case,Tenant shall have the right to terminate the Lease. Landlord, at all times during this Lease, reserves the right to take any action it deems -- necessary, in its reasonable discretion, to repair, maintain, alter or improve the Premises in connection with its operations as may be necessary. D. Before approving the placement of Antennae Facilities, Landlord may obtain, at Tenant's expense, an interference study indicating whether Tenant's intended use will interfere with an), existing communications facilities on the Premises and an engineering study indicating %whether the Premises is able to structurally support the Tenant's Antennae Facilities without prejudice to the Landlord's primary use of the Premises. E. In the event any other party, except a governmental unit, office, or agency, requests a lease and/or permission to place any type of additional Antennae or transmission facility on the Premises, the procedures of this paragraph 14(E) shall govern to determine whether such Antennae or transmission facility will interfere with Tenant's transmission operations. If Landlord receives any such request, Landlord shall submit a proposal complete with all technical specifications reasonably requested by Tenant to Tenant for review for noninterference; however, Landlord shall not be required to provide Tenant with any specifications or information claimed to be of a proprietary nature by the third party. The third party shall be responsible for the reasonable cost of preparing the technical specifications for its proposed transmission facility. Tenant shall have thirty(30) days following receipt of said proposal to make any reasonable objections thereto, and failure to make any objection within said thirty(30) day period shall be deemed consent by Tenant to the installation of Antennas or transmission facilities pursuant to said proposal. If Tenant gives LEASE AGREEMENT-6 (Lc-dlord: City of Kent Tenant: VOICESTMM PCS III CORPORATION) (December 13,1000) notice of objection due to interference during such 30-day period, then Landlord shall not proceed with such proposal unless Landlord modifies the proposal in a manner determined, in Landlord's reasonable judgment, to adequately reduce the interference. In determining acceptable levels of interference, Landlord shall act in accordance with the then-prevailing interference rules and regulations promulgated by the FCC. In that case, Landlord may proceed with the proposal. A governmental unit may be allowed to place Antennae or other communications facilities on the Premises regardless of potential or actual interference with Tenant's use; provided, however, if Tenant's use of the Premises is materially affected, Tenant may terminate the Lease. F. Tenant's use and operation of its facilities shall not interfere with the use and operation of other communication facilities on the Premises which pre-existed Tenant's facilities. If Tenant's facilities cause interference, Tenant shall take all measures reasonably necessary to correct and eliminate the interference. If the interference cannot be eliminated in a reasonable time, Tenant shall immediately cease operating its facility until the interference has been eliminated. If the interference cannot be eliminated within 30 days, Landlord may terminate this Lease. 15. Default and Parties' Remedies. It shall be a default if Tenant defaults in the payment or provision of Rent or any other sums to Landlord when due, and does not cure such default within twenty (20) days after receiving notice; or if either party defaults in the performance of any other covenant or condition of this Lease and does not cure such other default within thirty(30) days after written notice from the other party specifying the default complained of, or if such default,is not curable within thirty(30) days, if the defaulting party fails to commence such cure within thirty(30) days or fails to thereafter diligently prosecute such cure to completion, or if Tenant abandons or vacates the Premises. In the event of a default, Landlord shall have the right, at its option, in addition to and not exclusive of any other remedy Landlord may have by operation of law, without any further demand or notice, to re-enter the Premises and eject all persons therefrom, and declare this Lease at an end, in which event Tenant shall immediately remove the Antennae Facilities and pay Landlord a sum of money equal to the total of: (i) the amount of the unpaid rent accrued through the date of termination; (ii)the amount by which the unpaid rent reserved for the balance of the term exceeds the amount of such rental loss that the Tenant proves could be reasonably avoided (net of the costs of such reletting); and (iii) any other amount necessary to compensate Landlord for all detriment proximately caused by Tenant's failure to perform its obligations under the Lease. No re-entry and taking of possession of the Premises by Landlord shall be construed as an election on Landlord's part to terminate this Lease, regardless of the extent of renovations and alterations by Landlord, unless a written notice of such intention is given to Tenant by Landlord. Notwithstanding any reletting without termination, Landlord may at any time thereafter elect to terminate this Lease for such previous breach. 16. Cure by Landlord. In the event of any default of this Lease by Tenant,the Landlord may, after notice and after expiration of the cure period specified in paragraph 15 hereof, cure the LEASE AGREEMENT-7 (Landlord: Clry ojKent;Tenant. VOICESTREAM PCS III CORPORATION) (December 13.2000) default for the account of and at the expense of the Tenant. If Landlord is compelled to pay or elects to pay any sum of money or to do any act which will require the payment of any sum of money or is compelled to incur any expense, including reasonable attorney fees in instituting,prosecuting, or defending any action to enforce the Landlord's rights under this Lease, the sums so paid by Landlord, with all interest, costs, and damages shall be deemed to be Additional Rental and shall be due from the Tenant to Landlord on the first day of the month following the incurring of the respective expenses. 17. Assisznment: Successor and Assists. All of the terms and provisions contained herein shall inure to the benefit of and shall be binding upon the parties hereto and their respective heirs, legal representatives, successors, and assigns. This Lease shall not be assigned by Tenant without the express written consent of the Landlord, %N-hich consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. Any attempted assignment in violation of this paragraph shall be void. The transfer of the rights and obligations of Tenant to a parent, subsidiary, or other affiliate of Tenant, or to any successor-in- interest or entity acquiring fifty-one percent (5 1%) or more of Licensee's stock or assets, shall not be deemed an assignment. Landlord shall give to Tenant thirty(30) days' prior written notice of any such transfer. 18. Heading The caption and paragraph headings used in this Lease are inserted for convenience of reference only and are not intended to define, limit, or affect the interpretation or construction of any term or provision hereo:. 19. No Other Inducement. The execution and delivery of this Lease by the parties hereto has been induced by no representations, statements, warranties, or agreements other than those expressed herein. 20. Non-Waiver. No waiver by any party hereto of a breach of any provision of this Lease shall constitute a waiver of any prec;ding or succeeding breach of the same or any other provision hereof. 21. Choice of Law and Venue. This Lease shall be governed exclusively by the laws of the State of Washington, without regard to its conflicts of law principles. If any dispute arises between the Landlord and Tenant under any of the terms, conditions and provisions of this Lease, which cannot be resolved by the Landlord's determination in a reasonable time, or if the Tenant does not agree with the Landlord's decision on a disputed matter, any resulting litigation, shall lie exclusively within the venue, rules and jurisdiction of the King County Superior Court at the Regional Justice Center, located in Kent, King County, Washington. 22. Attorney's Fees. Without waiving any of Landlord's rights under§7 -Indemnity,in the event of any action or proceeding brought by either party against the other under this Lease,each party shall pay its own attorney and legal fees in such action or proceeding,including costs of appeal, if any. In addition, should it become necessary for any party to employ legal counsel to enforce any of the provisions herein contained because of such other party's breach of its obligations under this LEASE AGREEMENT- 8 (Landlord: City q(Kent:Tenant. VOICESTREfM PCS 111 COR,PORAT/ON) (December 13,2000) Lease, each party shall pay all its own attomey's fees and costs. For the purposes of this provision, the terms "action" or "proceeding" shall include arbitration, administrative,bankruptcy, and judicial proceedings, including appeals therefrom. 23. Modification of Amendment. No amendment, change, or modification of this Lease shall be valid, unless in writing and signed by all parties hereto. 24. Termination. Except as otherwise provided herein, this Lease may be terminated, without any penalty or further liability as follows: A. immediately if Tenant notifies Landlord of unacceptable results of any title report prior to Tenant's installation of the Communications Equipment on the Premises; B. this Lease may be terminated by either party upon a default, as described in § 15, of any material covenant or term hereof by the other party C. upon ninety(90) days' written notice by Tenant if the Property, the Building or the Communications Equipment are or become unacceptable under Tenant's design or engineering specifications for its Communications Equipment or the communications system to which the Communications Equipment belong; D. immediately upon written notice by Tenant if the Building or the Communications Equipment are destroyed or damaged so as to substantially and adversely affect the effective use of the Communications Equipment. In such event, all rights and obligations of the parties shall cease as of the date of the damage or destruction, and Tenant shall be entitled to the reimbursement of any Rent prepaid by Tenant. If Tenant elects to continue this Lease, then all Rent shall abate until the Premises and/or Communications Equipment are restored to the condition existing immediately prior to such damage or destruction; or E. at the time title to the Property transfers to a condemning authority, pursuant to a taking of all or a portion of the Property sufficient to render the Premises unsuitable for Tenant's use. 25. Tenant's Corporate Authority. Tenant is a Delaware corporation, and each individual executing this Lease on behalf of said corporation represents and warrants that he or she is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Lease on behalf of said corporation, in accordance with a duly adopted resolution of the board of directors of said corporation or in accordance with the bylaws of said corporation, and that this Lease is binding upon said corporation in accordance with its terms. Tenant further represents and warrants that it is fully registered and qualified to do business in the State of Washington. LEASE AGREEMENT-9 (Landlord: City of Kem.Ten=w VOICESTRE,lM PCS III CORPORATIOA9 (December 13,1000) 26. Landlord's Authority. Landlord is a Washington municipal corporation, and each — individual executing this Lease on behalf of said municipal corporation represents and warrants that he or she is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Lease on behalf of said corporation, in accordance with the provisions of such agreement as governs said corporation, and that this Lease is binding upon said corporation in accordance with its terms. Landlord further represents and warrants that it is fully constituted and qualified to do business in the State of Washington. 27. Notices. All notices to be given hereunder shall be in writing and shall be personally delivered and receipt acknowledged. All notices shall be sent via facsimile, with the original delivered within three(3)days via United States certified mail, return receipt requested,or the notice may be sent via overnight delivery through public or private service, delivery charge prepaid and addressed to the party at the respective mailing address as herein set forth. To Landlord at: Attn: Charlie Lindsey Facilities Management Superintendent City of Kent 220 Fourth Avenue South Kent, WA 98032 To Tenant at: With a copy to: VoiceStream PCS III Corporation VoiceStream Wireless 12920 S.E. 38`h Street Attn: Lease Administrator Bellevue, WA 98006 19807 North Creek Parkway North Attn: PCS Leasing Administrator Bothell, WA 98011 With a copy to: Attn: Legal Department It is understood that each party may change the address to which notice may be sent by giving a written notice of such change to the other party hereto in the manner herein provided. 28. Waiver of Landlord's Lien. Landlord hereby waives any and all lien rights it may have, statutory or otherwise, concerning the Communications Equipment or any portion thereof which shall be deemed personal property for the purposes of this Lease, regardless of whether or not the same is deemed real or personal property under applicable laws, and Landlord gives Tenant and Mortgagees the right to remove all or any portion of the same from time to time,whether before or after a default under this Lease, in Tenant's and/or Mortgagee's sole discretion and without Landlord's consent. LEASE AGREEMENT- 10 (Landlord: City of Kent. Tenant: VOICESTRF.AM PCS III CORPORA TIOAQ (December 13.2000) 29. Entire Agreement. This Lease constitutes the entire understanding and agreement of the parties with respect to its subject matter and any and all prior agreements, understandings, or representations with respect to its subject matter are hereby cancelled in their entirety and are of no further force or effect. This Lease shall not be effective or binding upon any party until fully executed by both parties hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,Tenant and Landlord have executed this Lease effective as of the date first set forth above. LANDLORD: TENANT: CITY OF KENT VOICESTREAM PCS III CORPORATION By: By: JIM WHITE Print Name: Its: MAYOR Its: . i\i r<-CJL-1 Date: Date: i 2 = c7 ATTEST: BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: Approved as to fc4� LU By: in-aI ( n�rrst Attorney' ROGER LUBOVICH, MY ATTORNEY LEASE AGREEMENT- 11 (Landlord: City of Kent;Tenant: VOICESTREAM PCS III CORPORATION) (December 13.1000) STATE OF WASHINGTON ) : ss. COUNTY OF KING ) I hereby certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Jim White is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he signed this instrument, on oath stated that he is authorized to execute the instrument on behalf of the City of Kent as its Mayor, and such execution to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the foregoing instrument. -Notary Seal Must Appear Within This Box- IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and official seal the day and year first above written. NOTARY PUBLIC, in and for the State of Washington, residing at My appointment expires STATE OF WASHINGTON ) : ss. COUNTY OF KING ) I hereby certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that 'T> �u `r v r+n isthepersonwho appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he/she signed this instrument, on oath stated that he is authorized to execute the instrument on behalf of the VOICESTREAM PCS III CORPORATION as its -6,r t,C.:t-r , and such execution to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the foregoing instrument. -Notary Seal Must Appear Within This Box- IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and official seal the day and year vtpove written. .• ••, l COL 140TA19 N; �Y��cl,eliz �. Ab►��t� = NOTARY PUBLIC, in and for the State p�BLIC 1D-7�a tiF i8C-- 7 X.. cP r0 ; of Washington,residing at xrt .i1 +uF : F� W.t3,���` p'�.; My appointment expiresA IS ►c-+3-a�o1 P.Cjvep�366%Vo,=Str PM m caepoem doc —• LEASE AGREEMENT- 12 (Landlord: City ojKent;Tenant: VOICESTREAM PCS X CORPORATION) (December 13,2000) EXHIBIT A DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY -his exhibit is a_tached to and incorporated into that certain Lease _tee as of March 1, 2001 by and between VOICESTREAM PCS III, INC. , a -al-aware corporation, as Tenant, and CITY OF KENT, a Washington =uni=ipal corporation, as Landlord, and references the location and or Lena_ description_ of the property subject to the Lease. 1 of that real property situate in the City of Kent, County of King, =tat=_ of Washinetzn described as foiloo7s: Centennial Center Office Building located at Lot A of lot line adjustment No . L•L - 89 - 36 dated 1/24/90 New Lot "A" LOTS 7, 8, & 9, BLOCK 8 AND THE CAST 20.00 FEET Or LOTS, 4, 5, & 6, IN BLOCK 13 OF YESLER'S FIRST AOCITICN TO THE TOWN OF KENT,AS PER PLAT RECORDED iN VOLUME 5 OF PLATS.. PAGE 64, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHiNGTON. 70GETHER WITH ALL OF VACATED THIRD AVENUE ADJOINING SAID LOTS 7, 8, & 9, FLOCK 8 AND LOTS 5. & 6, BLOCK 13 OF SAID PLAT. ALL SITUATE IN THE CITY OF KENT, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. or Nl. CCWE19 al is e� a�. Q e ire •� O W.; 71rus sr =r LEASE AGREEivl NIT- 13 rLcnc'ad: C :ofKent.tenant: OiCES7-,M4MPCS III CORPORA 770to (December I3.2000) EXHIBIT B f , -CAW my w IN • Ibar O• / ❑ .4 PLC.) -� A �]]]][ ^_ C.-.Send _ _ __ I - gCrojj �(cI mNNdr� �f1l•OMcR �• O• _ �.�. o1$1a�21� � ��OMCRS LEASE AGREEMENT- 14 (LznWord. City of Kent, Tenant. VOICESTREkW PCS lII CORPORATION) (December 13.2000) EXHIBIT C A. Up to 9 panel antennas: Manufacturer: EMS Model: 651900 DP Weight: 23 pounds Dimensions: 78"x 8" x 2.75" B. 2 coaxial cables per antenna panel: Manufacturer: Andrews Diameter: 7/8" C. Up to 3 equipment cabinets: Type Weight Dimensions BTSBBU 1,300 pounds 60.6"W x 57.5"H x 42.3"D BTS 495 pounds 30.3"W x 57.5"H x 42.3"D Future 495 pounds 30.3"W x 57.5"H x 42.3"D D. Related cabling and other related equipment. LEASE AGREEMENT- 15 (Landlord: City of Kent. Tenant: VOICESTMM PCS III CORPORATION) (December 13.-"?DO) Kent City Council Meeting Date January 16 , 2001 Category Other Business 1 . SUBJECT: KENT RETAIL CENTER REZONE RZ-2000-1 (KIVA #2003136) 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: This request is to rezone approximately 4 . 35 acres of property from O-MU, Office-Mixed Use, to CC-MU, Community Commercial-Mixed Use . The property is located on Benson Highway at SE 253rd Street . A public hearing was held before the Hearing Examiner on December 20, 2000 and the Hearing Examiner recommended approval of the proposed application on December 29, 2000 . 3 . EXHIBITS : Staff report, Findings and Recommendation, and map 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Hearing Examiner (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) S . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS : 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember _moves, Councilmember W4 seconds to accept jec - the findings, conclusions, and recom- mendation of the Hearing Examiner on the Kent Retail center rezone application (RZ-2000-1) , and to authorize the City Attorney to prepare the necessary ordinance, DISCUSSION: '}�n ACTION: e► ' Council Agenda Item No. 7A PLANNING SERVICES Fred N. Satterstrom, AICP, Manager Phone:253-856-5454 K E N T Fax: 253-856-6454 WASHINGTON Address: 220 Fourth Avenue S. Kent,WA 98032-5895 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER Theodore P. Hunter Hearing Examiner FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION FILE NO: KENT RETAIL CENTER #RZ-2000-1 KIVA #2003136 APPLICANT: Paul Franks, Paul Franks Architects REQUEST: A request to rezone approximately 4.35 acres of property from 0- MU, Office-Mixed Use, to CC-MU, Community Commercial-Mixed Use. LOCATION: The subject property is located north of SE 253rd Place on the west side of 104'' Avenue SE. APPLICATION FILED: August 28, 2000 DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE ISSUED: November 27, 2000 MEETING DATE: December 20, 2000 RECOMMENDATION ISSUED: December 29, 2000 RECOMMENDATION: APPROVED STAFF REPRESENTATIVE: Kurt Hanson, Planning Services Steve Mullen, Public Works Stan Wade, Public Works PUBLIC TESTIMONY: Paul Franks, applicant EXHIBITS: 1. Hearing Examiner file containing, Mitigated Determination of Non-significance, Notice of Public Hearing, application and staff report. Hearing Examiner Findings and Recommendation Kent Retail Center #RZ-2000-1 KIVA #2003136 Findings 1. Applicant proposes to rezone approximately 4.35 acres from Office Mixed-Use (O-MU) to Community Commercial-Mixed Use (CC-MU). Current zoning would permit a maximum of 25% of any development to be retail, or up to 50% with approval of a conditional use permit. Under the proposed rezone, development could potentially be 100% retail with some limits as to floor area and site coverage. The subject property is located north of SE 253`d Place, along the west side of 104th Avenue SE. The only buildings currently on the subject property are a single-family residence and two outbuildings. Staff Report, Attachment (a) and Testimony of Kurt Hanson. 2. This is a non-project rezone. A Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) (#ENV-2000-36) with no conditions for the proposal was issued on November 27" 2000. Staff Report, Attachment (0 and Testimony of Paul Franks. 3. The property directly to the north of the subject property is zoned Office Mixed Use (O-MU). The property directly to the east is zoned Professional Office (0). The property directly to the south is zoned Community Commercial-Mixed Use (CC-MU). The property directly to the west is zoned Medium Density Multifamily (MRM). Staff Report and Testimony of Kurt Hanson. 4. Commercial operations and professional office developments surround the subject parcels to the north, east, and south. Amy Nails Salon borders to the north, Benson Business Center lies to the east, and Red Robin Restaurant borders to the south. Kent Meridian High School is adjacent to the west of the subject property. Staff Report and Testimony of Kurt Hanson. 5. The Kent Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element encourages a future growth and development pattern which implements the community's vision, protects environmentally sensitive areas, and enhances the quality of life of all of Kent's residents. Goal LU-6 and associated Policy LU-6.1 of the Plan encourage development of concentrations of commercial development with surrounding areas of medium-density housing. Policy LU-6.1 also urges that these areas to be intensified to support transit and curtail additional sprawling development patterns. The Economic Development portion of the Comprehensive Plan also broadly promotes regional office and by encouraging According to the Kurt Hanson, there is an increased need for retail space in the neighborhood surrounding the proposed rezone because the residential and working populations have grown rapidly in recent years. Because of the current zoning, however, the subject property has remained vacant while surrounding Page 2 Hearing Examiner Findings and Recommendation Kent Retail Center #RZ-2000-1 KIVA#2003136 properties have been developed. The proposed rezoning would facilitate the development of the site and will serve important commercial and service needs of the growing population in the area. Staff Report and Testimony of Kurt Hanson and Paul Franks. 6. The current average daily traffic along 104t' Avenue Southeast is approximately 22,500 vehicles. The proposed rezone would allow for development that has the potential for higher traffic burdens in the vicinity than if development were to occur under the current zoning. This higher burden could be effectively mitigated, however, with the payment of an Environmental Mitigation Fee to pay for a proportional share of the South 272"d Street / South 277the Street Corridor Project. Exhibit Staff Report and Testimony of Paul Franks. 7. Notice of the hearing was properly given. Exhibit 1. Conclusions Jurisdiction The Hearings Examiner has jurisdiction to hear and decide this application pursuant to authority granted by the Legislature in Chapter 35A.63 of the Revised Code of Washington and authority granted by the City of Kent in Chapter 2.32 of the Kent City Code. Criteria for Review Kent Zoning Code, Section 15.09.050 provides the following standards and criteria for review for a rezone: I The proposed rezone is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan 2 The proposed rezoned and subsequent development of the site would be compatible with development of in the vicinity. 3 The proposed rezone will not unduly burden the transportation system in the vicinity of the property with significant adverse impacts which cannot be mitigated. 4 Circumstances have changed substantially since the establishment of the current zoning district to warrant the proposed rezone. Conclusions based on Findings 1. The proposed rezone is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan The proposed rezone would allow for retail development on the subject property. This development would help to serve the needs of the surrounding population, Page 3 Hearing Examiner Findings and Recommendation Kent Retail Center #RZ-2000-1 KIVA #2003136 in furtherance of the Comprehensive Plan's goal of concentration of commercial activities and mixed-use developments. Findings of Fact 3, 4 & 5. 2. The proposed rezoned and subsequent development of the site would be compatible with development of in the vicinity. The subject property is surrounded by a variety of office, retail, and other uses. The proposed rezone would allow for development consistent with this mixed-use nature of the area, and would help serve retail needs of the surrounding population. Findings of Fact 1, 3, 4 & 5. 3. The proposed rezone will not unduly burden the transportation system in the vicinity of the property with significant adverse impacts which cannot be mitigated. Although the proposed rezone might lead to development that would increase traffic in the vicinity beyond that which currently permissible development is likely to create, the effects can be effectively mitigated through contributions to local road projects. Findings of Fact 6. 4. Circumstances have changed substantially since the establishment of the current zoning district to warrant the proposed rezone Because the working and residential population of Kent continues to grow, there is a greater need for retail service providers in the area since the establishment of the current zoning district. Findings of Fact 5. Decision Based upon the preceding Findings and Conclusions, the request for a zoning variance is GRANTED, without conditions. Dated this 29th day of December, 2000. THEODORE PAUL HUNTER Hearing Examiner Page 4 PLANNING SERVICES Fred N. Satterstrom,AICP, Manager 4400 Phone: 253-856-5454 KENT Fax: 253-856-6454 WASHINGTON Address: 220 Fourth Avenue S. Kent, WA 98032-5895 KENT PLANNING SERVICES (206) 856-5454 STAFF REPORT FOR HEARING EXAMINER MEETING OF DECEMBER 20T", 2000 FILE NO: KENT RETAIL CENTER #RZ-2000-1 KIVA #2003136 APPLICANT: Paul Franks, Paul Franks Architects (425) 803-0792 REQUEST: A request to rezone approximately 4.35 acres of property from O-MU, Office-Mixed Use to CC- MU, Community Commercial-Mixed Use. STAFF REPRESENTATIVE: Kurt Hanson, Planner STAFF RECOMMENDATION: APPROVAL I. GENERAL INFORMATION A. Description of the Proposal The applicant proposes to rezone approximately 4.35 acres from the current zoning of O-MU, Office-Mixed to CC-MU, Community Commercial- Mixed Use. The existing zoning of O-MU would permit a maximum of 25% of the development to be retail, and up to 50% with approval of.a conditional use permit. Under the proposed rezone to CC-MU, the development could be all retail with limits placed on floor area and site coverage. Sensitive area regulations of the Kent Zoning Code would prohibit development on approximately 1/3 of the property's western boundary due to the existing wetland. Staff Report Kent Retail Center Rezone #RZ-2000-1 KIVA #2003136 B. Location The subject property is located north of SE 253rd Place on the west side of 1041h Avenue SE (north of the Red Robin restaurant). Approximate address is 2503X 1041h Avenue SE. C. Size of Prooertv The subject parcels total approximately 4.35 acres in size (parcel #2022059061 is 2.39 acres, parcel #2022059095 is 1.96 acres). D. Zoning The property surrounding the subject site to the north is zoned O-MU, Office-Mixed Use. The property to the east of the subject site is zoned O, Professional Office. The property directly to the south is zoned CC-MU, Community Commercial-Mixed Use. The property directly to the west is zoned MRM, Medium Density Multifamily. E. Land Use The two subject parcels currently are developed with a single-family residence and two outbuildings. These structures will be demolished upon commercial development of the site. Commercial operations and professional office developments surround the subject parcels to the north, east and south. Namely, Amy Nails Salon to the north, Benson Business Center to the east and Red Robin Restaurant to the south. The parcels immediately west of the subject property are fully developed with the Kent Meridian High School and associated athletic fields. F. History The subject property was annexed to the City of Kent in 1984 as part of a 35-acre annexation (Ordinance. #2503). II. 'ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS A. Environmental Assessment A Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) (#ENV-2000-36) with no conditions for the rezone proposal was issued on November 27`", 2000. Page 2 Staff Report Kent Retail Center Rezone #RZ-2000-1 KIVA #2003136 This non-project rezone proposal does not affect any sensitive area(s), and development impacts will be analyzed in the SEPA submitted with the specific project that is proposed for the site. B. Significant Physical Features Topography. Wetlands and Vegetation Vegetation on the subject parcel consists of various types of grass and brush with scattered deciduous and fir trees. The site generally slopes from east to west at an average grade of approximately 5 to 7 percent, except for the westerly portion of the site, which contains slopes in excess of 20 percent. An existing wetland is located along the western portion of the site. A wetland delineation and report have been completed to determine the location and type of wetlands. This wetland report received preliminary approval from the City of Kent Public Works Department on November 22"d, 2000. As a result of the wetland analysis, a 50-foot buffer will be required beyond the existing wetlands, and no development or disturbance is to occur within the wetland or buffer area. This non-project rezone proposal does not affect this sensitive area(s), and development impacts will be analyzed in the SEPA submitted with the specific project that is proposed for the site. Also required will be approval of detailed drainage plans, a stormwater retention/detention pond facility, a wetland delineation report, and wetland mitigation plan. A separate Sensitive Area Tract will need to be deeded in fee simple to the City, or grant a Sensitive Area Easement to the City for the entire sensitive area. C. Significant Social Features 1. Street System The subject property is located adjacent to 104th Avenue SE. This street is classified a Minor Arterial. The street has a public right-of- way width of 95 feet, approximately 58 feet of which is paved. The Public Works Department has identified specific improvements which will be necessary on 104th Avenue SE to serve subsequent development of the property. These improvements include (but are not limited to) the dedication of property along 104th Avenue SE for street/sidewalk/streetlight improvements. Page 3 Staff Report Kent Retail Center Rezone #RZ-2000-1 KIVA #2003136 2. Water System The site is served by a 12-inch water main located on the west side of 1041h Avenue SE. 3. Sanitary Sewer System There is an existing 10-inch sanitary sewer line located on the west side of 104th Avenue SE. 4. Stormwater System A stormwater system will be necessary to accommodate any subsequent development. The developer will be required to construct a stormwater treatment system in accordance with Kent Construction Standards in conjunction with a development proposal. 5. LIDs — LID #321: 104th Avenue SE Street Improvements. III. CONSULTED DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES The following departments and agencies were advised of this application: City Administrator City Attorney Director of Public Works Chief of Police Parks & Recreation Director Fire Chief Building Official City Clerk In addition to the above, all persons owning property which lies within 300 feet of the site were notified of the application and of the public hearing. Staff comments have been incorporated in the staff report where applicable. IV. PLANNING DEPARTMENT REVIEW A. Comprehensive Plan In 1995, the Kent City Council adopted the Kent Comprehensive Plan, which represented a complete revision to the City's 1977 comprehensive Page 4 Staff Report Kent Retail Center Rezone #RZ-2000-1 KIVA #2003136 plan. The 1995 plan was prepared under the provisions of the Washington State Growth Management Act. The Comprehensive Plan, through its goals and policies, presents a clear expression of the City's vision of growth for citizens, the development community, and other public agencies. The plan is used by the Mayor, City Council, Land Use and Planning Board, Hearing Examiner, and City departments to guide decisions on amendments to the City's zoning code and other development regulations, which must be consistent with the plan, and also guide decisions regarding the funding and location of capital improvement projects. LAND USE ELEMENT The Land Use Element of the plan contains a Land Use Plan Map, which designates the type and intensity of land uses throughout the city, as well as in the entire potential annexation area. The Land Use Plan Map designates the subject property as Mixed, Limited Multifamily. The land use element also contains goals and policies relating to the location, density, and design of future development in the City and in the Potential Annexation Area. Overall Goal: Encourage a future growth and development pattern which implements the community's vision, protects environmentally sensitive areas, and enhances the quality of life of all of Kent's residents. Goal LU-6: Designate activity centers in portions of the city and in the annexation area. Allow in these areas a mix of retail, office, and residential development. Policy LU-6.1: Locate activity centers in areas which currently contain concentrations of commercial development with surrounding medium-density housing. Intensify these areas to support transit and to curtail additional sprawling development patterns. Goal LU-9: Provide opportunities for a wide variety of housing types, options, and densities throughout the city and the Potential Annexation Area. Policy LU-9.2: Allow and encourage a variety of multifamily housing forms, such as townhouses, Page 5 Staff Report Kent Retail Center Rezone #RZ-2000-1 KIVA #2003136 residences above businesses, triplexes and fourplexes, duplexes and attached single family units in multifamily districts and designated commercial areas. Planning Department Comment: As mentioned, the Land Use Element in the Comprehensive Plan designates the subject property as Mixed, Limited Multifamily. The Mixed Use designation allows retail, office, and multifamily residential uses together in the same area. Its proximity to commercial development located to the north and south, and the office and multifamily development to the east as well as, the presence of many urban services, particularly water and sewer make it feasible for Community Commercial-Mixed Use. This proposed rezone is supported by the goals and policies cited above. The development of vacant or underutilized properties within the City prevents further urban sprawl on the edges of the planning area. In addition, infill development provides a much more efficient means of providing services and enhancing pedestrian opportunities. One of the overall themes of the comprehensive plan is to provide a wide variety of housing types and opportunities to accommodate projected population growth without converting single family land to multifamily. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: Goal ED-3: Promote commercial development to provide employment for citizens and services for residents, and maintain Kent's position as an economic center in South King County. Policy ED-3.2: Promote regional office and commercial enterprises in core areas of the city. Policy ED-3.5: Encourage mixed use zoning to provide opportunities for residential use in commercial areas. Planning Department Comment The proposed rezone is supported by relevant goals and policies of the economic development element. The proposed location is easily and well served by existing services, and is conveniently located in proximity to Page 6 Staff Report Kent Retail Center Rezone #RZ-2000-1 KIVA #2003136 multifamily residential development. Also, as noted elsewhere in this report, the proposed rezone is consistent with the Land Use Plan Map, which contemplates Mixed, Limited Multifamily for this area. TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT: Goal TR-1: Coordinate land use and transportation planning to meet the needs of the City and the requirements of the Growth Management Act. Policy TR-1.1: Locate commercial, industrial, multifamily, and other uses that generate high levels of traffic in designated activity centers around intersections of principal or minor arterials or around freeway interchanges. Policy TR-1.2: Coordinate new commercial and residential development in Kent with transportation projects to improve affected roadways. Policy TR-1.5: Ensure consistency between land use and transportation plans so that land use and adjacent transportation facilities are compatible. Planning Department Comment: The Growth Management Act requires consistency between land use and transportation planning. As noted, the Land Use Plan identifies the area of the rezone for Mixed Use Multifamily. The Public Works Department will identify specific improvements, which will be necessary on 104`h Avenue SE to serve subsequent development of the property. These improvements will be addressed in the SEPA submitted with the specific project that is proposed for the site and may include (but are not limited to) the dedication of property along 1040' Avenue SE for street/sidewalk/streetlight improvements. The current average daily traffic (ADT) along 104th Avenue Southeast is approximately 22,500 vehicles. This Rezone would allow the potential construction of a development which will create more PM Peak Hour Trips _ than possible with the current zoning. Upon development of this rezoned parcel, the Applicant/Owner shall pay an Environmental Mitigation Fee to participate in, and pay a fair share of the construction costs of the City's Page 7 Staff Report Kent Retail Center Rezone #RZ-2000-1 KIVA #2003136 South 272nd Street/South 2771h Street Corridor Project. All new PM Peak Hour Trips created above what would have been permitted under the previous zoning will be charged at twice the rate of those PM Peak Hour Trips permitted under the previous zoning. The minimum benefit to the Applicant/Owner is estimated at approximately $178,356 (1986 dollars to be adjusted for inflation based upon the Consumer Price Index, United States City Average for all Urban Consumers, or the substituted index as prepared by the United States Department of Labor) based upon 43 new PM Peak Hour Trips (at the rate of $1068 per Peak Hour Trip) and upon 62 new PM Peak Hour Trips (at the rate of $2,136 per Peak Hour Trip — the adjustment taken for Rezones) and the capacity of the South 272nd Street/South 277th Street Corridor. These figures are not final, but are based upon the information provided by the Applicant for the proposed Rezone. The final figures shall be determined after submittal of the SEPA application for the specific development proposed. B. Standards and Criteria for a Rezone Request The following standards and criteria (Kent Zoning Code, Section 15.09.050) are used by the Hearing Examiner and City Council to evaluate a request for a rezone. Such an amendment shall only be granted if the City Council determines that the request is consistent with these standards and criteria. 1. The proposed rezone is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Planning Department Comment The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Plan Map designates the subject property as Mixed, Limited Multifamily. The proposed CC-MU, Community Commercial — Mixed Use zoning allows multifamily residences to be included into the commercial development (although not a requirement). Therefore the proposed rezone is consistent with the type of land use called for in the Land Use Plan Map for the area. As mentioned earlier, the proposed rezone is also consistent with the applicable goals and policies in the Comprehensive Plan. Page 8 Staff Report Kent Retail Center Rezone #RZ-2000-1 KIVA #2003136 2. The proposed rezone and subsequent development of the site would be compatible with development in the vicinity. Planning Department Comment The proposed rezone would not have a negative impact on existing development in the vicinity. Commercial operations and professional office developments surround the subject parcels to the north, east and south. Namely, Amy Nails Salon to the north, Benson Business Center, and multifamily to the east and Red Robin Restaurant to the south. The parcels immediately west of the subject property are fully developed with the Kent Meridian High School and associated athletic fields. Development of the subject site to community commercial - mixed use would be compatible with existing development in the vicinity of the rezone. 3. The proposed rezone will not unduly burden the transportation system in the vicinity of the property with significant adverse impacts which cannot be mitigated. Planning Department Comment The traffic impacts during the PM peak hour are greater for Community Commercial — Mixed Use zoning than for Office — Mixed Use zoning because only generic trip generation data can be employed. The traffic impacts of actual development within each of the zones may differ dramatically. Mitigation of impacts to the traffic system will be required as necessary upon receipt of an application for development. 4. Circumstances have changed substantially since the establishment of the current zoning district to warrant the proposed rezone. Planning Department Comment As stated in the Kent Valley Industrial Study, "...The nature of Kent's industrial base is changing as it matures...Today's development pattern is more mixed. Service-type industries and office uses represent a larger and larger share of development proposals. A demand for retail and personal service uses has also resulted from the tremendous influx of employees into the City's industrial area...". The subject parcel has remained undeveloped under the current zoning of O-MU. The parcels opposite the subject property on 104t' Avenue SE are fully developed into Page 9 Staff Report Kent Retail Center Rezone #RZ-2000-1 KIVA #2003136 office parks. Directly to the north and south of the subject property are commercial uses that were developed prior to the establishment of the current zoning district. As a result, a rezone to CC-MU zoning would be more consistent with surrounding developed uses. 5. The proposed rezone will not adversely affect the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Kent. Planning Department Comment The proposed rezone is consistent with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan. Subsequent development on the site will have to meet applicable codes and regulations, including mitigation of anticipated environmental impacts. Therefore, the rezone proposal will not adversely affect the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Kent. V. CITY STAFF RECOMMENDATION Upon review of the merits of this request and the Code criteria for granting a rezone, the City staff recommends APPROVAL without conditions of the Kent Retail Center Rezone request. KENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT December 11, 2000 KH\ch\S:\Permit\Plan\rezone\2000\2003136-2000-1 report.doc Page 10 _ �-J/ t_ r.€K'� ;� -r✓ e,.,,fir , ,M ..r s �y/f d•'��-t*� ) it y3." - `' .. .. i•�,:i °PdeT�` W .11 ma's: +4ax'"-- 'xy 3 ri ��,�3� -s .cY'n ♦ 3 t:.- � su�y S .:_ f/J!m'.� F.'S ...rC ,.,`1�.+, [,. f 4�YY,i .-•, a}a.3f Wig w`�N . A• ' ��t i Ta". a , l• ,� ra,Ft'+ri` CD U AV Js ', ii'//�jJ/`_`//�// �ti Vv�'4l �•Yl � • ���{;¢� ��s. �•C�. . ..y , '• 3 1 ..., c t 'x A nr N t a �a .s _ m c _N Cr KENT RETAIL CENTER REZONE RZ-2000-1/KIVA#20003136 L -- Im i I i i Kent City Council Meeting Date January 16 , 2001 Category Other Business 1 . SUBJECT: 2000 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS (CPA-2002 (A-G) / CPZ-2000- (1-5) ) 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: By ordinance, amendments to the Kent Comprehensive Plan are processed collectively once every year. Applications for seven (7) plan amendments were received by September 1, 2000 . Five (5) of these applications involved proposed changes to the comprehensive plan map, one of which was withdrawn prior to the public hearing. The Land Use and Planning Board held a public hearing on November 27, 2000 . The Board' s recommendations are detailed in the attached report . 3 . EXHIBITS: Memo from Mayor to Council (1/9/01) , a staff report (11/27/00) , minutes of the LUPB (11/27/00) , City of Kent Capital Facilities Plan, Kent School District Capital Facilities Plan, and Federal Way School District Capital Facilities Plan 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Land Use & Planning Board (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS : 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds to approve/modify/deny the Land Use & Planning Board' s recom- mendations on the proposed 2000 annual comprehensive plan and zoning amendments, and to direct the City Attorney to prepare the necessary ordinance (s) . DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 7B KENT W A S H I N G T O N MEMORANDUM TO: LEONA ORR, COUNCIL PRESIDENT CITY COUNCILME ERS FROM: MAYOR JIM WHIT DATE: JANUARY 9, 2000 SUBJECT: YEAR 2000 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN & ZONING AMENDMENTS #CPA-2000-2 (A-G) AND #CPZ-2000-(1-5) It is my pleasure to forward to the City Council the Land Use and Planning Board's recommended Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Amendments for 2000. These recommendations are presented to you as per RCW 35A.63.070, 071 and 072. The City received seven (7) applications for amendments to the comprehensive plan. Five of these requests involve changes to the Land Use Plan Map, although one request was withdrawn prior to the public hearing. The proposed comprehensive plan amendments have been reviewed concurrently with corresponding changes to the Kent zoning map, where applicable. The Land Use and Planning Board considered the applications at a public hearing on November 27, 2000 and is recommending the following Comprehensive Plan text and map changes and corresponding zoning map changes (see attached maps): Proposal A— [Kentview Pod H #CPA-2000-2(A)/#CPZ-2000-11 Change in the Land Use Plan Map from Agricultural and Single Family Residential 3 units per acre to Single Family Residential 6 units per acre and corresponding change of the zoning map to SR-6, Single Family Residential 6.05 units per acre for property located at 21800 Frager Road/22002 Riverview Boulevard. The Land Use and Planning Board is recommending DENIAL. Proposal B - [Nguyen #CPA-2000-2(B)/#CPZ-2000-21 Change in the Land Use Plan Map from Low Density Multifamily to Commercial and corresponding change of the zoning map to CC, Community Commercial for property located at 12819 Kent Kangley Road. The Land Use and Planning Board is recommending APPROVAL. Proposal C - [Coblentz #CPA-2000-2(C)/#CPZ-2000-31 Change in the Land Use Plan Map from Industrial and Single Family Residential 6 units per acre to Low Density Multifamily and corresponding change of the zoning map to MR-G, Low Density Multifamily Residential, 16 units per acre for property located at South 222"d Street and 88`n Avenue South. The Land Use and Planning Board is recommending APPROVAL of the change in the Land Use Plan Map, with the zoning changed to SR-8, Single Family Residential 8 units per acre. Proposal D - [Gray #CPA-2000-2(D)/#CPZ-2000-41 This proposal was WITHDRAWN by the applicant prior to the public hearing. Proposal E - [Ranniger #CPA-2000-2(E)/#CPZ-2000-51 Change in the Land Use Plan Map from Single Family Residential 6 units per acre to Commercial or Mixed Use Restricted and corresponding change of the zoning map to O, Professional and Office for properties located at both the northeast and southwest corners of the intersection of 132"d Avenue SE and SE 256'h Street. The Land Use and Planning Board is recommending DENIAL. Proposal F - [Kent and Federal Way School Districts #CPA-2000-2(F)1 Updated Capital Facilities Plans to include a change in proposed impact fees in the Federal Way School District to $2,710 for single family and $830 for multifamily units. The Land Use and Planning Board held the public hearing on this issue and is forwarding the updated plans to the City Council without recommendation, allowing the City Council full flexibility in the adoption of budgetary matters. Proposal G - [City of Kent Capital Facilities Plan #CPA-2000-2(G)] Update the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan to reflect a 6-year plan for capital facilities projects. The Land Use and Planning Board held the public hearing on this issue and is forwarding the updated plan to the City Council without recommendation, allowing the City Council full flexibility in the adoption of budgetary matters. Staff will be available at the January 16, 2001 City Council meeting to discuss the Land Use and Planning Board's recommendations and to answer questions. = G Z' N IL N '0 .� fp W J p m N fn ?+' 0 1, Q dl tq = c a!S V rp N d Q E _ 'a ai m li 3 z c N t a° co 3 Y t> E cm ov 1 C� oC z . .. r T �'.'.'.'.'..'. .. q I In �li�ydy'• � / �/i! �� ` _•��'r���� /�" — �� i i Z __ —� _�_ _ _ ,�J \�—�/'' ��' Sul I• '�„-�--���/ , �,/%rid/� 71 \.I� \�'./�� � \\� �lw��= = '•! � \ ; I\I ! ��� �� M1nx 'MIN 2 0 La ate ' J c N c N 0 22 CN v a° m' 3 ,Y LL N 0 a ....... r r .:::::::::::::•.• �.. :':L'::.'.'.'.'...:4... .. \� �\ Ilk ��' ♦ - .. iIle 61 aif - _ \\ ✓ill Irl I�,, vl _ `� i A /'�(\_ , t /! � C U) m O o c o N%NW00 CO) � a ' yom NN Z O d V m C C C> +�+ N WO EO a m Y c S z m >" N ELL, z m' 3 3 v � ca oi , z b, ; J+ ' •i\ i - .... , S i .. .. /, on c 10 C4 E 0 Cl*00 = a o z m 3 I p7l Z . .......... if ............. . . . ... ..... .... ...... . ......... 10 cll� .............. ................ ......................... .................... . ........ ............ ......... ............... ..... .......0.. ...... ............ ....... .... .. ... .... ........... ................ ............. .......... ............................ . . J 'lot .......... ....................... ............ .............I................. ......... ........ ................ .......... .................................. ........... .............................. . ......... ............................... .................. .... ........... ........................ ........................ ........... ............................. ............................... .................. ............................................... . ........................................... . .............................................. . ..................................... . . ............... .......... ...... .................................................... i����' ��ij�,�iii���� � �i�►�l'^Ifji a ��lr �`�'//�%� � %1� �« Ott�5�� +.. 1y.:. _/_.�I. , • �E :�i� � �iqy/�i.'--...,--�/-}ii �.�•��,y� IG �� 10, i AW= • J ppa WE I - ���� � of awflul � ��� i �'ri ti0 �I I US .03 m Nil plid FIN slog NOW ;q� �rii Z. ✓ ,' y+ ILI a" orl Al 1-00 r3 f � it w LU 0 La To 0 0 0) S E q ?- a m c o 06 L) 0) CD 0 C C C E C Z - zQ c m E c '2 0 1 LL in E w 0 0 3c Jw age ,, I % ;Ov Ing ;i INA ce Lin 0 E ui, U) A to CM 41 S2r o Q C%I 0 Z C4 c r a 0) c c U -E Ivaso C. 0 l E a N Qu N La IL 0 z 49 W- =Wl NIP/ rift 11 Boom) FUJI % now is,, Im J PLANNING SERVICES Fred N.Satterstrom,AICP,Manager Phone:253-856-5454 KENT Fax: 253-856-6454 w.S N I N O T O N Address: 220 Fourth Avenue S. Kent,WA 98032-5895 CITY OF KENT PLANNING SERVICES (253) 856-5454 STAFF REPORT November 27, 2000 TO: JON JOHNSON, CHAIR, AND MEMBERS OF THE LAND USE & PLANNING BOARD FROM: DIANA C. NELSON, AICP, PLANNER SUBJECT: YEAR 2000 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS NOVEMBER 27, 1999 HEARING ♦ #CPA-2000-2(A)/CPZ-2000-1 KENTVIEW POD H AMENDMENT ♦. #CPA-2000-2(B)/CPZ-2000-2 NGUYEN AMENDMENT ♦ #CPA-2000-2(C)/CPZ-2000-3 COBLENTZ AMENDMENT ♦ #CPA-2000-2(D)/CPZ-2000-4 . GRAY AMENDMENT ♦ #CPA-2000-2(E)/CPZ-2000-5 RANNIGER AMENDMENT ♦ #CPA-2000-2(F)/ KENT and FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DISTRICTS CIP ♦ #CPA-2000-2(G)/CITY OF KENT CIP INTRODUCTION In April 1995, the Kent City Council adopted the Kent Comprehensive Plan, which was prepared and adopted under the provisions of the Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA). The GMA requires that comprehensive plans combine land use, transportation, capital facilities, and other elements in a way that is both internally consistent and consistent with plans from other jurisdictions in the region. The GMA also requires that a city's development regulations implement and be consistent with the plan. The GMA establishes procedures for the amendment of plans, and stipulates that plans can only be amended once a year unless an emergency is declared which requires immediate action. Pursuant to the provisions in the GMA, the City Council adopted an ordinance (Ordinance #3237) outlining procedures for the amendment of the City's plan. These procedures are now outlined in Chapter 12.02 of the Kent City Code. The City's procedures establish September 1 of each calendar year as the deadline for applications to be submitted to the Planning Department for proposed amendments to the plan. YEAR 2000 AMENDMENTS As of September 1 of this year, the Planning Department received seven (7) applications for amendments to the comprehensive plan. Five (5) applications were initiated by private property LUPB Public Hearing 11/27/00 2000 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page 2 owners and involve changes to the Land Use Plan Map and Zoning Map. The remaining two items are sponsored by the Kent and Federal Way School Districts and the City of Kent to update the Comprehensive Plan text to reflect changes to their capital facilities plans. The proposed amendments are summarized below: 1. #CPA-2000-2(A)/CPZ-2000-1 KENTVIEW POD H AMENDMENT - a request to change the land use map designation from Agricultural and (SF-3) Single Family, 3 units per acre to (SF-6), Single Family, 6 units per acre and amend the Zoning Map designation from (A-1), Agricultural, 1 unit per acre and(SR-3) Single Family Residential, 3.63 units per acre to (SR-6) Single Family Residential, 6.05 units per acre. The property is located at 22002 Riverview Boulevard/21800 Frager Rd. 2. #CPA-2000-2(B)/CPZ-2000-2 NGUYEN AMENDMENT - a request to change the land use map designation from Low Density Multifamily to Commercial and amend the Zoning Map designation from (MR-G) Low Density Multifamily Residential, 16 units per acre to (CC), Community Commercial. The property is located at 12819 Kent Kangley Rd. 3. #CPA-2000-2(C)/CPZ-2000-3 COBLENTZ AMENDMENT -a request to change the land use map designation from Industrial and (SF-6) Single Family, 6 units per acre to Low Density Multifamily and amend the Zoning Map designation from (CM-1) Commercial Manufacturing and (SR-6) Single Family Residential, 6.05 units per acre to (MR-G) Low Density Multifamily Residential, 16 units per acre. The property is located at South 222nd Street and 88th Avenue South. 4. #CPA-2000-2(D)/CPZ-2000-4 GRAY AMENDMENT — a request to change the land use map designation from Agricultural to (SF-6) Single Family, 6 units per acre and amend the Zoning Map designation from (Al) Agricultural, 1 unit per acre to (SR-6) Single Family Residential, 6.05 units per acre. The property is located at the Northwest corner of South 216th Street and 46th Avenue South. 5. #CPA-2000-2(E) CPZ-2000-5 RANNIGER AMENDMENT - a request to change the land use map designation from (SF-6) Single Family, 6 units per acre to Commercial or Mixed Use Restricted and amend the Zoning Map designation from (SR-4.5), Single Family Residential, 4.53 units per acre and (SR-6), Single Family Residential, 6.05 units per acre to (0), Professional and Office. The property is located at the northeast and southwest corners of the intersection of 132nd Avenue Southeast and Southeast 256th Street. 6. #CPA-2000-2(F) KENT & FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DISTRICT CAPITAL FACILITIES 2000 PLAN — a request to amend the text of the Comprehensive Plan to reflect proposed changes to impact fees, resulting from new student population generated by new single family and multifamily residential development. 7. #CPA-2000-2(G) CITY OF KENT FINANCE DEPT CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT — a request to amend projects, cost and revenue summaries of the Capital Facilities Element in the 1995 Comprehensive plan as required under the Growth Management Act(GMA). It should be noted that any proposed changes to the Land Use Plan Map are reviewed concurrently with corresponding amendments to the zoning map. LUPB Public Hearing 11/27/00 2000 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page 3 YEAR 2000 HEARING PROCESS At the November 27, 2000 public hearing, staff will be presenting all of the above items, numbered #CPA-2000-2(A-G). This memorandum will present information about each of these proposed amendments. Maps have been prepared, and are attached, for each area that will be affected by the proposed changes to the Land Use Plan Map and zoning map. Each proposed amendment will be analyzed and staffs recommendation will be noted. STANDARDS OF REVIEW Section 12.02.050 of the Kent City Code outlines the standards of review, which must be used by staff and the City Council in analyzing any proposed comprehensive plan amendments. Proposed amendments are to be examined based on the following criteria: 1. The amendment will not result in development that will adversely affect the public health, safety, and general welfare; 2. The amendment is based upon new information that was not available at the time of adoption of the comprehensive plan, or that circumstances have changed since the adoption of the plan that warrant an amendment to the plan; and 3. The amendment is consistent with other goals and policies of the comprehensive plan, and that the amendment will maintain concurrency between the land use, transportation, and capital facilities elements of the plan. The proposed plan amendments have been analyzed based on these criteria. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS Proposal A - #CPA-2000-2(A)f CPZ-2000-1 Kentview Pod H Amendment: Change in Land Use Plan Map and zoning for property located at 21800 Frager Road/22002 Riverview Boulevard Applicant: Polygon Northwest Company Existing Plan Designation: Agricultural and Proposed Plan Designation: SF-3, Single Family SF-6, Single Family 3 units/acre 6 units/acre Existing Zoning: Al, Agricultural Proposed Zoning: 1 unit/acre and SR-6, Single Family Residential SR-3, Single Family 6.05 units/acre Residential 3.63 units/acre Background The subject property is a 22.5-acre parcel, composed of three tax lots, which were formerly designated as Tracts H, K and L of the Kentview Planned Unit Development (PUD). The site currently has dual zoning and land use designations. The western portion of the site is zoned SR-3 Single Family Residential, 3.63 units per acre with a Land Use Designation of SF-3 Single Family Residential. The central and eastern portions of the property, approximately 15 acres, are zoned All, Agricultural, 1 unit per acre, with a Land Use Designation of Agricultural. The LUPB Public Hearing 11/27/00 2000 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page 4 residential density associated with these three tracts was transferred to another area of the PUD and this area was set aside for development as a school and a park site as well as for placement of the sewer lift station. The site was offered for sale to the school district and the Kent Parks Department, but neither has chosen to purchase the property to date. The applicant is discussing donating an acre in one comer of the subject property to the city for a BMX bike park. There is an inventoried wetland located on the site. The wetlands in this area are being enhanced with additional wetland plants and are to be used for stormwater detention for the Kentview PUD. A recently constructed sewer lift station is located in the northeast corner of Pod H. The site slopes gently down from lower slopes of the west hill to the valley floor near the Green River. The site was filled as part of the PUD development. Prior to filling of the site, it was predominately composed of Briscot silt loam , Puyallup fine sand loam and Woodinville silt loam, all of which are classified as Class II agricultural soils. On the eastern portion of the parcel, in the area that is already zoned SR-3 for residential use, there was some inclusion of Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes, which has a Class VI agricultural capability rating, i The western leg of this site fronts on the recently constructed Riverview Boulevard. Primary access to this site will be from Riverview Boulevard. Frager Road is designated as a scenic byway, and no direct vehicular access to the site will be approved from the eastern side of the I site. Emergency access might be approved if the fire department requires an additional access to the PUD. However, a gate, bollards or other access management technique would be required to limit non-emergency traffic on the road to pedestrians and cyclists. The site is located within the Valley Floor area of the city, and will take its primary access from the 42nd Avenue South Corridor. The 42nd Avenue South Corridor is classified as a Residential Collector Arterial Street upon the City's Master Plan of Roadways. The current average daily traffic (ADT) along the 42nd Avenue South Corridor is unknown. The proposed level of density will add up to an estimated 13,500 daily and 135 PM peak hour trips to the local street system and will cause I significant and/or additional congestion at several surrounding intersections. I F Analysis Prior to inclusion in the Kentview PUD, the subject property would have been permitted to be developed with approximately 42 single family dwelling units, approximately 15 units on the land zoned Al and approximately 27 units on the land zoned SR-3. During the development of the PUD, the development rights for these allowed residential units were transferred within the PUD to allow increased density in other areas of the development. The site was designated on the i PUD map as a school or park site. The applicant filled the property as part of the PUD ; development, but without having a purchaser for the site or a specific development project i planned for the site. The applicant states that the site is no longer useable for agricultural purposes and the school district does not want the site. Therefore, unless this rezone is granted, they are being denied economically viable use of their property. The applicant is requesting a land use designation and zoning classification that could allow the development of approximately 94 more dwelling units on this property beyond the approximately 42 units already permitted as part of the PUD project. Although the applicant offered to sell the property to the Kent School District and the Kent Parks Department, neither party has actually purchased the property or entered into an agreement to do so. LUPB Public Hearing 11/27/00 2000 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page 5 1 In addition to the PUD issues regarding this property, is the question of the appropriate pattern and intensity of development on or near agricultural lands. The City has not yet undertaken a comprehensive analysis of the costs and benefits of the development of agricultural lands and/or the preservation of open space within the city limits. Prior to the fill activity by the applicant, the property was composed of soils that are among the best agricultural soils found in King County and the site is located adjacent to properties currently under active agricultural production. Development of property adjacent to agricultural lands can have wide-ranging impacts on the continuing economic viability of those farms. The land use element of the comprehensive plan has several goals and policies relating directly to the protection of agricultural land and regulation of adjacent development including: Goal LU-27 - Ensure the conservation and enhancement of productive agricultural land via regulation, acquisition, or other methods. Policy LU-27.2 -Discourage incompatible land uses adjacent to agricultural lands. Policy LU-27.3 - Mitigate development in order to minimize impacts on viable agricultural lands. Rezoning individual parcels without an inclusive city strategy for the appropriate future use of agricultural land and properties bordering agricultural land and/or the development of criteria by which individual requests to rezone agricultural property can be evaluated, will allow development of these lands to occur in a piece-meal manner that may not be in the City's best interests. The City is currently working on an update of the 1995 Comprehensive Plan. An _ analysis of the present and futures uses of agricultural lands in relation to the city's land use pattern, growth needs and land availability will be an integral element of this update. Examination of the appropriate use of the subject property and the surrounding area is already planned as part of the comprehensive plan update process. It may be premature to change the land use designation and zoning classification at this time, before a widespread and thorough analysis of this entire area can be completed. Recommendation: Staff recommends DENIAL of this request. Proposal B - #CPA-2000-2(B)l CPZ-2000-2 Nguyen Amendment: Change in Land Use Plan Map and zoning map for property located at 12819 Kent-Kangley Road Applicant: Huy and Long Khanh Thi Nguyen Consultant: DBM Consulting Engineers Existing Plan Designation: Low Density Multifamily Proposed Plan Designation: Commercial Existing Zoning: MR-G,Low DersilyMUtifar*Residential Proposed Zoning: 16 units/acre CC, Community Commercial LUPB Public Hearing 11/27/00 2000 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page 6 Background The subject property consists of one tax parcel with an area of approximately .35 acres configured in a triangular shape with public roads on two sides. The site is located on the south side of Kent-Kangley Road, west of 1281' Place SE. The property is currently zoned Low Density Multifamily Residential, 16 units per acre, and the land use designation is Low Density Multifamily. A vacant single-family residence currently occupies the site. Properties north and east of the site are zoned Community Commercial with a land use designation of Commercial and are developed with the Meridian Plaza shopping center, Value Village, and office buildings. The property west of the subject property is zoned Professional and Office with a land use designation of Commercial. This property is vacant and for sale. Directly south of the site, the area is zoned MR-G with a land use designation of Low Density Multifamily and is developed with a series of single family detached residences. Continuing south from the single-family residences, is the Springwood apartment complex. Adjacent to and directly east of the Springwood Apartments complex, a new Safeway store with a gas station and several other retail buildings or pads are currently in the process of obtaining building permits. There are significant wetlands, with associated streams, located south and west of the Nguyen property. However, there appear to be no known sensitive areas located on the subject property. The lot is basically flat. Primary and current access to the property is from 1281h Place SE. Future access from Kent- Kangley Road is very unlikely because it is designated as State Highway 516 and additional access points would further impede traffic flow. Neither public street is currently improved to its full design standard. Both streets will require improvement and/or widening in conjunction with continued development in the area. The current average daily traffic (ADT) along Kent Kangley Road / SR 516 is approximately 29,500 vehicles. It is not known the precise number of estimated daily and PM Peak Hour Trips that will be added to the local street system as a result of the proposed rezone and subsequent development. These impacts will be determined at the time of redevelopment. A similar request to change the land use designation to Commercial and the zoning to Community Commercial was made in 1998 under file number CPA-98-2 (F). That request was denied due to concerns regarding vehicular trip generation and safety. However, in September and October of 2000, the Washington Department of Transportation constructed road improvements on Highway 516 (Kent-Kangley Road) at the intersection of 128t' Place SE. These improvements include a meridian barrier between the eastbound and westbound lanes with a channeled left turn stacking lane for westbound traffic to turn onto 128' Place SE. This meridian configuration allows a right turn entrance onto 128w Place SE. from the eastbound lanes of Kent-Kangley Road, a restricted left turn access from the westbound lanes to 128'h Place and allows a right turn exit from 1281" Place into the eastbound lanes of Kent-Kangley Road. Left turns from 128"' Place SE. into the westbound lanes of Kent-Kangley Road will not be permitted. Analysis This site is located in an area under transition. New development and increased retail and other commercial activity in the area immediately surrounding the subject property is changing the nature of the neighborhood and will continue to do so. The demand for additional commercial LUPB Public Hearing 11/27/00 2000 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page 7 space may eventually result in the conversion of all of the single-family dwellings along 1281' Place SE. to commercial property. The land use element of the comprehensive plan has several goals and policies relating directly to the development of existing commercial areas including: Goal LU-12 - Promote orderly and efficient commercial growth within the existing commercial districts in order to maintain and strengthen existing commercial districts, to minimize costs associated with extension of facilities, and to allow businesses to benefit from their proximity to one another. Policy LU-12.3 - Develop regulatory incentives to encourage infill development in existing commercial areas. Regulatory incentives may include urban, mired-use zoning and higher- density zones, planned unit developments, transfer of density credits, and streamlined permit processes. Amending the land use designation and zoning to allow commercial use of this site will result in a minor expansion of the existing commercial area around the intersection of 132"d Ave. SE. and Kent-Kangley Road. Although commercial development will result in some increase to the number of vehicle trips to the site, the recent traffic improvements including the addition of meridian barriers to Kent-Kangley Road greatly reduces the accident potential associated with gaining vehicular access to the subject property. Recommendation Staff recommends APPROVAL of this request. Proposal C - #CPA-2000-2(C)/ CPZ-2000-3 Coblentz Amendment: Change in Land Use Plan Map and zoning map for property located at South 222"d Street and 88d' Avenue South Applicant: DBM Consulting Engineers Existing Plan Designation: Industrial and SF-6, Proposed Plan Designation: Single Family, 6 units/acre Low Density Multifamily Existing Zoning: CM1,CcmTlerrlalManAxl riigand Proposed Zoning: SR-6, Single Family Residential, MR-GLow Density Multifamily 6.05 units/acre Residential, 16 units/acre Background The subject site consists of four (4) tax parcels and covers an area of approximately 12.58 acres. The site has land use designations of Industrial and SF-6, Single Family Residential, six (6) units per acre. Approximately 3.5 acres of the subject property is zoned Commercial Manufacturing-1 and approximately 9.08 acres is zoned SR-6, Single Family Residential, 6.05 units per acre. The Coblentz site is located on at the base of the east hill, adjacent to State Route 167, just north of where the highway crosses over Central Avenue. The applicant is requesting a change from land use designations of SF-6, Single Family Residential, six (6) units LUPB Public Hearing 11/27/00 2000 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page 8 per acre and Industrial to Low Density Multifamily in order to develop the site with a multifamily residential development. One single-family residence and an accessory building currently occupy the site. A significant amount of the property is encumbered with slopes exceeding 25%. Development of the eastern portion of this property will be limited due to the severe slope hazard. There are no inventoried wetlands located on the subject property. The area to the south is zoned MRG and is currently under development with the Silver Springs apartment complex containing 251 units. Single family detached zoning and land use designations are located north and east of the site. The slopes on the eastern third of the property provide a separation between the Coblentz site and adjacent properties on the hill above. State Route 167 provides a barrier on the west side of the subject property. There are several other single-family dwellings in the area zoned SR-6 to the north. Two of these properties also have split land use designations of Industrial and Commercial Manufacturing -1, in addition to the residential designations. The land use designation and zoning of a portion of this site was changed by Ordinance No. 3331 under application number CPA-96-3 (A) in 1997. This area was changed from a land use and zoning designation of Single Family Residential 6 to Industrial land use and Commercial Manufacturing 1 zoning. A change was approved because of the difficulty in marketing the property for single family development in this location due to freeway noise. The applicant is now requesting a change to MRG, Low Density Multifamily zoning for the same reason. The applicants have submitted a Noise Report prepared by Environalysis for review in support of this request. 881h Avenue South is classified as a Residential Collector Street. This development is within an area which is characterized by streets with narrow traffic lanes, and narrow or no shoulders, and has been identified as having substandard pedestrian facilities. The 881h Avenue South / South 2241h Street / South 228`h Street Corridor is currently not improved to its design standard, and would require improvement / widening in conjunction with development subsequent to this rezone. The current average daily traffic (ADT) along South 2281h Street is approximately 8,300 vehicles. This development will add an estimated 20,000 daily and 198 PM peak hour trips to the local street system. The proposed South 2241h Street/ South 2281h Street Corridor is currently planned to include a bridge across SR 167 that will connect South 224h Street with 88'h Avenue South — or a new street constructed in lieu of keeping the 88`h Avenue South / Frontage Street in place - in the general vicinity of the southwest corner of these combined parcels. The precise alignment of this section of the South 2241h Street / South 228`h Street Corridor has not been determined at this time, so the potential impacts to the subject parcels as a result of this corridor project cannot be determined at this time. A viable long-term driveway access connection to either the corridor or to 88'h Avenue South from the subject parcels cannot be guaranteed by the city because of the uncertainties associated with the future design of the South 2241h / South 2281h Street Corridor. Analysis The applicant's request for MRG zoning would allow 201 multifamily units to be developed on the subject property. The current maximum residential density of this site would allow approximately 54 single family dwellings, but the topography of the site, slope setbacks, a minimum lot size of 5,700 square feet, dedication of public roads and the lack of clustering provisions in the zoning code would probably effectively reduce the number of potential LUPB Public Hearing 11/27/00 2000 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page 9 1 dwellings by half or greater. Improvements to the existing street system will be required for any type of development proposed for this site. Noise from SR 167 has some impact on the site. However, other residential development, including existing and proposed new dwellings, is located along the SR 167 corridor. The east leg of the proposed 228`h Corridor Project is planned to cross over SR 167 and connect to the east hill in this location. Although the exact specifics of the project design and location have not yet been determined, this project is included in the City of Kent 2001-2006 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) as S. 228`h Street Corridor (SR 515), Phase III (84`h to Benson). The construction and operation of another major arterial/ state highway in such close proximity to the site would have considerable further impacts on the subject property. Noise mitigation would likely be a component of any type of development in this location. The subject property is located between existing multifamily-zoned property to the south and single family-zoned areas to the north and east. The land use and housing elements of the comprehensive plan have several goals and policies relating directly to providing a variety of housing types and densities including: Goal LU-9 - Provide opportunities for a variety of housing types, options, and densities throughout the city and Potential Annexation Area. Goal LU-10 - Revise development regulations to encourage more single-family development and more flexibility and innovation in terms of building and site design. Goal H-4 - Expand home ownership opportunities for all income groups via land use regulations,financial strategies, and the removal of barriers to lending. Policy H-4.1 - Revise zoning and development standards to facilitate small lot sizes, manufactured housing on single-family lots, townhouses, condominiums, clustering, and other options which increase the supply of affordable home ownership opportunities. The City wishes to increase home ownership opportunities and promote more single-family residential development at all levels of affordability. The City recently created a residential multi-family townhouse zone that is intended to be an infill and transition area between multi- family and single-family zones and to help provide more affordable home ownership options. This two-story condominium-type of development is appropriate to the area and would act as a buffer and transition area between the single-family residential zones to the north and east and the four-story apartment development to the south. The townhouse zone allows clustering of units which would avoid disturbing that portion of the site with steep slopes while permitting the developer to maximize the allowed density of 12 or 16 units per acre, as appropriate to the site. The comprehensive plan land use designation of Low Density Multifamily applies to both the MRG, low density multifamily residential and MRT, multifamily residential townhouse, zones. However, a rezone to the MRT zone can only be requested if the entire subject property is already in SR-8, Single Family or one of several multi family or commercial zones. Approval of the LDMF land use designation and SR-8 zoning would allow the applicant to request a rezone to MR-T12, MR-T16 or MRG. Further information relating to the placement and impacts associated with the east leg of the 228" Street Corridor are likely to considerably affect which zone is considered most appropriate in this location in the future. Recommendation LUPB Public Hearing 11/27/00 2000 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page 10 Staff recommends APPROVAL of SR-8 zoning and Low density Multi Family land use designation, which would allow the applicant to apply for a rezone upon approval of the comprehensive plan map amendment. Proposal D - #CPA-2000-2(D)/CPZ-2000-4 Gray Amendment: A change in Land Use Plan Map and zoning map for property located at Northwest corner of South 2161h Street and 46'h Avenue South Applicant: W.E. Ruth Corporation Existing Plan Designation: Agricultural Proposed Plan Designation: SF-6, Single Family 6 units/acre Existing Zoning: Al, Agricultural Proposed Zoning: 1 unit/acre SR-6, Single Family Residential 6.05 units/acre Background The subject property consists of two parcels that are approximately 9.24 acres in size. The site is located on the north side of South 216'h Street east of 42nd Avenue South. The area north, east and directly south of the subject property is zoned Al, Agricultural and has a land use designation of Agricultural. This zoning allows agricultural related uses and development of detached single family residences at a density of one unit per acre. The area to the southwest is zoned Single Family Residential - 3 units/acre (SR-3) with a land use designation of Single Family - 3 units/acre (SF-3). The SeaTac city limits are less than 1,000 feet to the west of the site. The subject property is currently vacant. City of Kent inventoried wetlands surround the subject property. A small drainage ditch bisects the site. The property is generally flat and located in the vicinity of the Green River on the valley floor. The site is composed entirely of Briscot silt loam which is classified as Class II agricultural soil. A commercial sod and chip operation is located east of the Gray property. The Kentview PUD, which contains approximately 681 units, is located just south of the subject property on an area that is zoned Al and Single Family Residential 3. Sanitary sewer service has recently been extended into this area. Primary access to the subject property will be from South 216'h Street, which is classified as a residential street in this location. 42nd Avenue South is classified as a Residential Collector Arterial Street. This development is within an area which is characterized by streets with narrow traffic lanes, and narrow or no shoulders, and has been identified as having substandard pedestrian facilities. In addition, this proposal abuts South 2160'Street, which in turn connects to Frager Road, a designated scenic corridor which per city code is not supposed to carry new additional traffic. South 216'h Street is currently not improved to its design standard, and will require significant improvements to support development subsequent to a SR-6 rezone and continued growth in the area. Some improvements to the street system in the vicinity of this proposed amendment are under construction as conditions of approval of the Kentview development. The current average daily traffic (ADT) along South 216'h Street is unknown. This development will add an estimated 720 daily and 72 PM peak hour trips to the local street system. LUPB Public Hearing 11/27/00 2000 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page 11 Analysis The applicant is requesting a land use designation and zoning classification that potentially could allow over a 600% increase in density; the development of 55 dwelling units on property that currently would permit only 9 units. The site does not abut any residential zone and granting this rezone would create a "spot zone" of higher density single family residential in the middle of agricultural zoning, adjacent to potentially incompatible uses. The property contains soils that are among the best agricultural soils found in King County; there are no Class I soils mapped in King County. The site has been in cultivation as recently as last summer. The land use element of the comprehensive plan has several goals and policies relating directly to the protection of agricultural land and regulating adjacent development including: Goal LU-27 - Ensure the conservation and enhancement of productive agricultural land via regulation, acquisition, or other methods. Policy LU-27.2 -Discourage incompatible land uses adjacent to agricultural lands. Policy LU-27.3 - Mitigate development in order to minimize impacts on viable agricultural lands. The City has not yet undertaken a comprehensive analysis of the costs and benefits of either the development of agricultural lands and/or the preservation of open space within the city limits. Rezoning individual parcels without an inclusive city strategy for the appropriate future use of agricultural land and/or the development of criteria by which individual requests to rezone r agricultural property can be evaluated, will allow development of these lands to occur in a piece- meal manner that may not be in the City's best interests. The City is currently working on an update of the 1995 Comprehensive Plan. An analysis of the present and futures uses of agricultural lands in relation to the city's land use pattern, growth needs and land availability will be an integral element of this update. Examination of the appropriate use of the subject property is already planned as part of the comprehensive plan update process. It is premature to change the land use designation and zoning classification at this time, before a widespread and thorough analysis of the agricultural area can be completed Recommendation: Staff recommends DENIAL of this request. Proposal E - #CPA-2000-2(E)/CPZ-2000-5 Ranniger Amendment: A change in Land Use Plan Map and zoning map for the property located at 13133 SE 256d' Street, the northeast and southwest corners of the intersection of 132"d Avenue SE and SE 256U' Street. Applicant: Dan and Debrah Ranniger Existing Plan Designation: SF-6, Single Family Proposed Plan Designation: 6 units/acre ConrrtercialorMixed llseRestricted Existing Zoning: SR-45, Single Fan*ResidenGal Proposed Zoning: 4.53 units/acre and O, Professional and Office SR-6,Single Farr y RmidertN, 6.05 units/acre LUPB Public Hearing 11/27/00 2000 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page 12 Background The application site consists of a total of five tax parcels and covers an area of approximately 4.15 acres. The site is located on diagonally opposite corners of the intersection of 132nd Avenue SE and SE 256"' Street. The three parcels on the southwest corner of the intersection, approximately 2.6 acres, are zoned SR-6, Single Family Residential, 6.05 units per acre. The two parcels, approximately 1.55 acres, on the northeast corner are zoned SR-4.5, Single Family Residential, 4.53 units per acre. Both areas have a land use designation of Single Family Residential 6 units/acre. The applicants request a land use designation and a zoning of Professional and Office in order to market and develop the site with offices. The city does not have a Comprehensive Plan land use designation of Professional and Office, however, the office zone can be located in either the Commercial or Mixed Use Restricted land use designations. There are four existing single family detached residences located on the property, two on each corner. The subject property is partially flat with some rolling terrain. Inventoried wetlands and associated streams are located near the site on both the southeast and northwest corners of the intersection. No inventoried wetlands are located on the site. A recently completed single family detached subdivision, Bayberry Crest, is located west of the SW corner of this site. The area surrounding the subject property is residential in nature. All of the zoning and all of the land uses, except the cemetery to the east, in the vicinity of this site are residential. There is no commercial or office zoning or existing developments abutting or near the subject property. Existing commercial developments are located less than a mile away, north of the site at the intersection of 132"d Avenue SE and SE 240"' Street and south of the site at the intersection of 132"d Avenue SE and Kent-Kangley Road. Existing office zoning is located approximately one mile south of the site on south side of Kent-Kangley Road, west of the shopping center, and 1 % to 1 Y2 mile west of the site along SE 256 th Street and in several locations along 104'" Avenue SE. Primary access to the site would come from either or both SE 256"' Street and 132"d Avenue SE. Both streets are classified as Minor Arterials. Neither public street is currently improved to its design standard, and both will require improvement and widening in conjunction with continued development in the area. A project to improve traffic flow on SE 256"' Street is currently under construction with major work planned for the intersection at 132"d Avenue SE. The city has contracted to construct interim improvements to Southeast 256'" Street along the frontages for four of the five parcels applying for a Rezone. The City also has a 132"d Avenue Southeast interim street improvement planned between Southeast 240°i Street and Southeast 256'" Street in the City's 2001 to 2006 Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), an improvement that has frontage along one of the five parcels being rezoned. The current average daily traffic (ADT) along Southeast 256"' Street is approximately 15,700 vehicles and along 132"d Avenue Southeast is approximately 17,600. The proposed rezone and subsequent development these five parcels has the potential to add an estimated 600 to 830 daily and 77 PM peak hour trips to the local street system, which will cause significant and/or additional congestion at a number of surrounding intersections. Analysis Although traffic volume and noise are a concern for single-family residential development, the vast majority of development along both 132"d Avenue SE. and SE. 256`" Street is existing LUPB Public Hearing 11/27/00 2000 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page 13 residential subdivisions with the back yards of homes abutting these streets. Most subdivisions within the city abut at least one arterial street. City development patterns do not support the conversion of residentially zoned property in the middle of a single-family neighborhood to an office zone based solely on traffic concerns. In fact, a rezone of this property to office zoning would generate a significant amount of additional traffic on both of these arterials, beyond that which would be created by single family development, thereby intensifying the traffic impacts on the residential uses already existing in the neighborhood. The land use element of the comprehensive plan has several goals and policies relating directly to the development of existing commercial areas including: Goal LU-12 - Promote orderly and efficient commercial growth within the existing commercial districts in order to maintain and strengthen existing commercial districts, to minimize costs associated with extension of facilities, and to allow businesses to benefit from their proximity to one another. Policy LU-12.3 - Develop regulatory incentives to encourage infill development in existing commercial areas. Regulatory incentives may include urban, mixed-use zoning and higher- density zones, planned unit developments, transfer of density credits, and streamlined permit processes. The "office zone" allows a variety of office and service uses, most of which are also permitted in the Community Commercial (CC) zone. The subject property is located between existing commercial areas, which are not built out to maximum capacity, within less than a mile to the north and to the south of the site. Uses that are permitted in the office zone, but not currently allowed in the CC zone are few, and include mortuaries, business services, travel and employment agencies, medical and dental clinics, educational services, construction offices and research and development facilities. The applicant wishes to develop the subject property as a medical/dental office complex because he feels that there is a lack of office space on the East Hill where the majority of his clients live. However, undeveloped property with existing office zoning is located approximately one mile south as well as 1-2 miles west of the site. Along 104'" Ave. SE., several vacant parcels, with existing office zoning, are for sale. Further, at least two developed medical/dental office complexes have available space advertised for rent or lease. There also are other methods to generate additional office availability other than creating an additional commercial node in the middle of a residential area. The addition of offices uses, including medical and dental clinics, to the Community Commercial zone, via a zoning code amendment, would allow for more office availability in the City, in locations that are more compatible with the City's desired development patterns. Recommendation: Staff recommends DENIAL of this request. Proposal F - #CPA-2000-2(F) Kent and Federal Way School District CIP Amendment: Update of the Comprehensive Plan to reflect changes to Federal Way School District and Kent School District Capital Facilities Plans. Applicant: Kent& Federal Way School Districts LUPB Public Hearing 11/27/00 2000 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page 14 The applicants' request to amend the text of the Comprehensive Plan to reflect proposed changes to impact frees resulting from new student population generated by new single family and multifamily residential development. Continuing growth and development in the City of Kent create additional demand and need for school facilities. The Growth Management Act requires that new growth and development pay a proportionate share of the cost of new facilities needed to serve the new growth and development. Thus, on December 19, 1995 the Kent City Council adopted Ordinance No. 3260 establishing a school impact fee program as authorized by the Growth Management Act and RCW 82.02.050. Kent City Code Chapter 12.13.070 requires that the Kent and Federal Way School Districts submit Capital Facilities Plans to the City of Kent on an annual basis for City Council review for the purpose of establishing the impact fee. The Capital Facilities Plans of the School Districts shall be reviewed in conjunction with any update of the Capital Facilities Plan element of the City's Comprehensive Plan. The impact fees proposed by the 2000 Kent and Federal Way School Districts Capital Facilities Plans are as follows: Kent School District Single Family 1999 Impact Fee $3,782 2000 Proposed Impact Fee (No Change) Multifamily 1999 Impact Fee $2,329 2000 Proposed Impact Fee (No Change) Federal Way School District Single Family 1999 Impact Fee $2,384 2000 Proposed Impact Fee 2,710 Multifamily 1999 Impact Fee $ 786 2000 Proposed Impact Fee 830 Recommendation: Staff recommends APPROVAL of the updates to the Kent and Federal Way School Districts Capital Facilities Plans and proposed impact fees. Proposal G - #CPA-2000-2(G) City of Kent Capital Facilities Plan Amendment: Update of the Capital Facilities Element Applicant: City of Kent Finance Department The Capital Facilities Element in the comprehensive plan, which was adopted in 1995, contains a great deal of information relating to inventories of existing capital facilities, estimated costs of anticipated future facilities, and projected revenues to fund these facilities. These components of the Capital Facilities Element are all required under the Growth Management Act (GMA). The Growth Management Act requires that the Capital Facilities Element be updated to reflect r LUPB Public Hearing 11/27/00 2000 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page 15 the growth of the city in order to maintain concurrency with the Land Use and Transportation elements. In conjunction with the annual budget process for the City of Kent, the Finance Department has proposed amendments to the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan to identify a six-year plan for capital facilities projects, including costs and revenue sources. The Capital Facilities Plan results from requests by City departments for projects in their areas of responsibility in conformance with the Growth Management Act, adopted goals and policies of the City of Kent Comprehensive Plan, departmental plans and City Council Target Issues and Strategic Action Plan. The plan provides capital for transportation, utilities, public safety, parks and general government facilities. Recommendation: Staff recommends APPROVAL of the updates to the 2001 —2006 Capital Facilities Plan, as prepared by the Finance Department. CONCLUSION In summary, the staff recommendations for the seven proposed plan amendments are as follows: Proposal A - DENIAL of the request for Single Family- 6 units/acre (SF-6) land use designation and Single Family Residential - 6 units/acre (SR-6)zoning. Proposal B - APPROVAL of the amendment of land use designation to Commercial on the comprehensive plan map and to Community Commercial (CC) on the zoning map. Proposal C - APPROVAL of the amendment of land use designation to Low Density Multifamily on the comprehensive plan map and Single Family, 8 units/acre (SR- 8) on the zoning map. Proposal D - DENIAL of the request for Single Family- 6 units/acre (SF-6) land use designation and Single Family Residential -6 units/acre (SR-6)zoning. Proposal E - DENIAL of the request for Commercial or Mixed Use Restricted land use designation and Professional and Office (0) zoning. Proposal F - APPROVAL of the update of the Capital Facilities Plan for the Kent and Federal Way School Districts. Proposal G - APPROVAL of the update of the Capital Facilities Element as prepared by the City of Kent Finance Department. If you have any questions prior to the November 27`' public hearing, please contact Diana Nelson at (253) 856-5437. DN pm S:1PermrtlPlanIREPORTS120001CPA-2000-2(A-G)11-27-OOrpt.doc PLANNING SERVICES Fred N. Satterstrom,AICP, Manager Phone: 253-856-5454 K E N T Fax: 253-856-6454 WASHINGTON Address: 220 Fourth Avenue S. Kent, WA 98032-5895 LAND USE & PLANNING BOARD MINUTES Public Hearing November 27,2000 The meeting of the Kent Land Use and Planning Board was called to order by Chair Jon Johnson at 7:00 p.m. on Monday,November 27, 2000 in Council Chambers of Kent City Hall. LAND USE & PLANNING BOARD STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS PRESENT Jon Johnson, Chair Fred N. Satterstrom,AICP, Planning Mgr. Ron Harmon, Vice Chair Charlene Anderson, AICP, Sr. Planner Brad Bell Diana Nelson,AICP, Planner Steve Dowell Pat Fitzpatrick, Asst. City Attorney David Malik Pamela Mottram, Administrative Secretary Sharon Woodford Terry Zimmerman APPROVAL OF MINUTES Terry Zimmerman MOVED and David Malik SECONDED to approve the minutes of the October 16 and 23 meeting. Motion carried. ADDED ITEMS TO THE AGENDA None COMMUNICATIONS None NOTICE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS Planning Manager, Fred Satterstrom stated that the Board's recommendation for CPA-2000-1 Urban Separators would be brought before the City Council at their December 12 meeting. CPA-2000-2(A)/CPZ-2000-1 KENTVIEW POD H AMENDMENT Planner, Diana Nelson stated that the property is located at 21800 Frager Road and 22002 Riverview Boulevard. She stated that the existing plan designation for the property is Agricultural for approximately 15 acres of the parcel and (SF-3) Single Family, 3 units per acre on the western portion of the property comprised of approximately 7.5 acres. Ms. Nelson stated that the existing zoning is (A-1) Agricultural, I unit per acre and (SR-3) Single Family Residential,3.63 units per acre. Ms. Nelson stated that the proposed plan designation is (SF-6) Single Family, 6 units per acre for all of the parcel and the proposed zoning is (SR-6) Single Family Residential, 6.05 units per acre. The subject property is a 22.5 acre parcel composed of three tax lots that were formerly designated as tracts H, K and L of the Kentview Planned Unit Development(PUD). Ms. Nelson stated that the subject property was set aside for development as a school and park site, as well as the placement of a sewer lift station. She stated that the wetlands in this area are being enhanced with additional plants that are used for storm water retention for the Kentview PUD. Ms. Nelson stated that the western leg of the site fronts on the recently constructed Riverview Boulevard within the PUD and primary access to this site would be from Riverview Boulevard. Ms. Nelson stated that Frager Road is designated as a scenic byway and no direct vehicular access to the site will be approved from the eastern side of the site. She stated that primary access to the property is from the 42nd Avenue south corridor and the proposed level of density will add up to approximately 1350 additional daily and 135 p.m. Land Use and Planning Board Minutes November 27, 2000 Page 2 peak hour trips to the local street system. Ms. Nelson noted an error in the staff report that says "13,500" and should be corrected to read 1350 daily trips. Ms. Nelson stated that during the development of the Kentview PUD, the development rights for residential density on this 22.5 acre parcel of property (approximately 42 units based on the zoning), were transferred within the PUD to allow increased density in other areas of this development. Ms. Nelson stated that the applicant is requesting a land use designation and zoning classification that would allow the development of approximately 94 additional dwelling units on this property. She stated that the City of Kent has not yet adequately studied the appropriate pattern and intensity of development on or near agricultural lands. Ms.Nelson stated that the City of Kent is in the process of updating their comprehensive plan. She stated that an analysis of present and future uses of agricultural lands concerning the City's land use pattern and growth needs would be a part of this study. She stated that the land use element of the comprehensive plan currently has several goals and policies directly relating to the protection of agricultural lands and the regulation of adjacent development. These include Land Use Goal 27 which states "ensure the conservation and enhancement of productive agricultural land via regulation, acquisition and other methods". Ms. Nelson stated that Policy LU-27.2 under that goal states "Discourage incompatible land uses adjacent to agricultural lands" and Policy LU-27.3 states "Mitigate development in order to minimize impacts on viable agricultural lands". Ms. Nelson stated that this property before the fill activity by the applicant was composed of soils that were the best agricultural soils found in King County. This property is adjacent to currently cultivated property. Therefore, the development on this property can have impacts on continued economic viability both on adjacent and surrounding lands. Ms. Nelson stated that Planning Services staff is currently reviewing the agricultural lands. Staff feels that it is premature at this time to change the zoning and land use designation. Therefore, staff recommends DENIAL. Ms. Nelson stated in response to Ms. Zimmerman that the additional 42 units were allocated and built elsewhere within the PUD. Ms. Nelson stated that land has been cultivated with row crops in several fields north of this property. Ms. Nelson stated that through discussions with the Kent School District and the City of Kent Parks Department, she was informed that the school district was offered approximately 13.5 acres of land to be set aside for an intended school site. Ms.Nelson stated that the developer is creating a one acre BMX Park to be given to the City of Kent. Ms. Nelson stated that she was not aware of any specific conditions or requirements of approval that would mandate the applicant to sell, donate or otherwise develop the land. Ms. Nelson stated that this property has been filled with gravel and other types of material, so that this soil can no longer be considered as Class 2 Agricultural soils. Ms. Nelson stated that the City of Kent issued a permit for the fill as part of the PUD with the understanding that this property was set aside for development as a park or school. Chair Jon Johnson declared the Public Hearing open. John Green, 21839 Framer Rd., Kent, WA 98032 stated that the Cruz Johnson Farm is located directly _ north of the property requesting a rezone. He stated that this farm has been a productive farm for many years, producing the best sweet corn in the valley as well as producing other vegetables which they offer for sale through a road side stand. Mr. Green stated that his neighborhood contacted the Project Manager, Mr. Gary Young of Polygon three years ago to inquire about the proposed plans for the Riverview development. He stated that after this call,he Land Use and Planning Board Minutes November 27, 2000 Page 3 hosted two community meetings at his home inviting Polygon to meet with the neighbors to look at their maps and plans. Mr. Green stated that throughout the duration of developing this PUD, this particular area in question has been shown as A-1 zoned, a future school site, to be offered to the city or alternatively for a park or recreational use such as a baseball or soccer field. Mr. Green stated that when asked, Polygon repeatedly stated that this property would not be rezoned for residential use. Mr. Green stated that his community believes that playground or park usage fits in better with the City of Kent and King County's commitment to retain the west side of the river as a greenbelt and for agricultural usage. He stated that he would like the Board to deny this rezoning request. Jacque Davis, 4815 S. 216th, Kent, WA stated that she resides north of the property requesting a rezone. She would like this property preserved for agricultural, greenbelt areas and recreational land uses. Ms. Davis submitted a copy of City of Kent Ordinance No. 2489 for the record as Exhibit #5 encouraging the preservation of agricultural lands. Ms. Davis submitted copies of King County's Ordinance No's. 6853, 6946 and 6650 for the record as Exhibit #6 in support of preserving this land for agricultural purposes. Ms. Davis stated that she and her neighbors have complied with the A-1 zoning requirements by preserving their properties with pasture lands, gardens, orchards and evergreen tree areas. She stated that the residents have constructed their driveways and load-bearing roads with packed gravel rather than asphalt so that the roadways would be permeable. Ms. Davis stated that approval of this rezone would erode the agricultural environment of the area and she encouraged the Board to deny the rezone request. Steve Hansen, 21847 Frager Road, Kent, WA stated that there is a large demand for the produce generated by the Cruz Johnson Farm. The broad variety of produce grown in this area provides economic activity and is irreplaceable. He encouraged the Board to retain the agricultural zoning and deny the applicant's request for a rezone. Brian Nicholson, 21831 Frager Road, Kent, WA stated that he supports the City's recommendations to carry out further research on development and long range planning. He stated that the applicant's desire to change the zoning of this section of property is occurring too soon. Mr. Nicholson stated that the extent of impact to the surrounding agricultural lands, traffic and the Valley would not be realized until the Kentview PUD is complete and all homes are occupied. Mr. Nicholson supported staff s recommendation to deny the rezone request. Gary Young, Polygon Northwest Company, 11624 SE 5th St., Suite 200, Bellevue, WA stated that the Pod H property was purposely set-aside specifically for a school facility development or park use. He stated that both the Kent School District and the City of Kent Parks Department declined to purchase this property. Mr. Young stated that Polygon has invested in the installation of a lift station facility constructed on the eastern corner of the property with a gravel access road, which is an extension of the main access to Pod H from within the community. He stated that this road runs along the northern boundary of Pod H and separates this property from the Dela Cruz Farm property. Mr. Young stated that Polygon placed gravel fill on this property under permits issued by the City of Kent with the intention of developing Pod H. The fill altered this property so that it is no longer productive farmland. He stated that Polygon has invested funds to provide for roads and other infrastructure to this property and feels committed to recover their cost and provide additional low-density single family housing on this property. Mr. Young stated that single family housing would be the most compatible use adjacent to the agricultural land area. Land Use and Planning Board Minutes November 27, 2000 Page 4 Mr. Young emphasized that the King County area has seen phenomenal job formation without providing housing to meet those needs. He stated that development of this property would provide the opportunity to integrate both the needs for housing and at the same time develop a nice community. Mr. Young stated that there would not be access to Frager Road from the Pod H development. However, if the City of Kent Public Works or Fire Departments desired a fire access road, this could be created using restrictive measures so that only the Fire Department could gain access to this property from Frager Road. Mr. Young stated that Polygon would like to complete development of Pod H in concert with the development underway, rather than wait several years to work through policy changes. He asked the Board to consider all the factors presented. Mr. Young, in response to Ms. Zimmerman, stated that it was Polygon's intent to recover their cost through the sale of Pod H to either the school district or the City of Kent. Mr. Young, in response to Mr. Harmon, stated that the original master plan for build-out of the PUD indicates 680 units; approximately half of these units are constructed. He stated that he could not determine if Polygon would reach their 680-unit goal at final build-out based on a number of requirement restrictions. Mr. Young stated that Pod H has the potential build-out for ninety homes but believes that this figure would decrease due to wetland constraints, the construction of the BMX Bike Park and the lift station. Kimberly Voss, 22274 Russell Road, Kent, WA 98032 stated that she resides on the west side of the river, across from Pod H. She stated that she has a small orchard and favors retaining the agricultural zoning of this area. She voiced her support of staff s recommendation to deny this rezone request. Dan Moberly, 12033 SE 256th, Kent,WA 98031 stated that he is the Superintendent for Business Services for the Kent School District. He stated that he supports staff s recommendation to deny this rezone request. Mr. Moberly stated that Mr. Young approached the Kent School District in 1997 and 1999 after the school district bond failed. He stated that failure of the bond placed the school in a position where they were unable to consider appraisal of the land nor negotiations towards purchase of the property. Mr. Moberly stated that he believes that Polygon behaved in the best interest of the school district with the fill used on this site. Mr. Moberly voiced concern over the number of students generated with the initial development of 685 units. He stated that the addition of 94 units on Pod H could create concerns as to where these students would be housed as time goes on. Mr. Moberly voiced his concern that this property might not be developable as a school site due to the existing wetlands and based on the endangered species act. However,he stated that the School District would like the option in the future to be able to consider this property for a school site. Eric Wells, 11624 SE 5th Street, Suite 200, Bellevue, WA submitted a letter dated November 27, 2000 and signed by Gary Young for the record as Exhibit #7. He stated that he worked with the City of Kent Parks Department in an attempt to reach an agreement with the City to purchase Pod H for a park. Mr. Wells stated that concurrently, the results of the I-695 proposal left the City without available funds for purchasing the land. Mr. Wells reiterated many of Gary Young's concerns. He stated that one concern included mitigating the financial impacts encountered through the infrastructure that Polygon has already provided on this site. He stated that neither the School district nor the City of Kent Parks Department is purchasing this land. He stated that as there is the potential that Polygon may not be able to reach their original build-out estimate of 680 units, it would be feasible to transfer the building of some of those units to Pod H. Mr. Wells reiterated that constructing single family homes on Pod H would allow for viable use of the land with the least impact for the area. He stated that 100 acres has been preserved within the PUD as open space and cannot be developed. Land Use and Planning Board Minutes November 27, 2000 Page 5 Mr. Wells spoke about the road improvements relevant to the PUD on 42nd Avenue, 212th and 216th with a traffic signal being installed at 42nd Avenue and 212th to mitigate some of the traffic impacts in the area. He stated that a pedestrian bridge has been installed to provide a pedestrian link to the recreational corridors. Mr. Wells stated that sewer, water and all the dry utilities are installed to the site. Debbie Nicholson,21831 Frager Road, Kent,WA voiced her concern over the traffic that will be generated with the development of Kentview. She stated that the existing road system is deficient for the homes that Kentview is already going to place in this PUD let alone adding additional homes. Ms. Nelson spoke to Polygon's economic arguments on recouping their costs on Pod H. Ms. Nelson questioned how much of the residential value of the land should be assumed by the School District, provided they purchased the land. She stated that Polygon has already used a portion of this land if not all of the value of this property for residential purposes. Ms. Nelson said that although Mr. Young stated that Polygon is asking for the lowest single family density, they are actually requesting the second highest single family density of(SR-6) 6.05 units per acre. She stated that none of the adjacent properties has a density of 6 units per acre but rather have densities of one or three units per acre as well as single family residential zones of A-1, SR-I, SR-2 and SR-3. Ms. Nelson stated that if the Board were to recommend approval, staff is recommending that the Board choose one of the lower density zones for this area to retain the character of the surrounding area along Frager Road. Mr. Bell asked Diana to clarify her statement where she indicated that the School District and the City of Kent would purchase the property if the price were low enough. She stated that the correct interpretation should have been that either the School District or the City of Kent would be interested in investigating the property if the price is right. In response to Mr. Dowell, Diana stated that there are still productive farms in the valley and they are generally smaller than they used to be. Mr. Dowell indicated that the Board's recommendation could have a far-reaching affect on the future of those agriculturally zoned areas. Diana concurred with Mr. Dowell. She stated that any decisions dealing with agricultural zoned properties and properties adjacent to agricultural zoned property need to have a comprehensive city strategy so as not to create a ripple affect. Terry Zimmerman MOVED and Ron Harmon SECONDED to close the Public Hearing. Motion Carried. Sharon Woodford stated that she would like the agricultural lands to remain and said that if homes are built on this property it could lead to the disappearance of much of the Valley's agricultural lands in the future. Therefore, until the City has a set policy on agricultural lands, she voiced her concurrence with staff s recommendation to deny this request. Steve Dowell concurred with Ms. Woodford and voiced his support of staff s recommendation to deny this request. Terry Zimmerman stated that Polygon's build-out would not be affected as a result of leaving Pod H alone. She stated that the school district would be interested in the land should money become available and the same could be said for the City of Kent in their search for funding sources for future park development. Ms. Zimmerman stated that the neighbors have objected strongly. She stated that the neighbors want the land left the way it is as they value their life styles and the farming land is a benefit to the community. She said that the City of Kent needs to formulate an agricultural policy. Ms. Zimmerman agreed with staff s recommendation to deny this request. Ron Harmon concurred that the City of Kent needs to set a policy before deciding to apply spot zoning. He stated that he takes exception with the City of Kent for issuing a fill permit to fill agricultural with disregard to LU-27.2 and 3. Mr. Harmon stated that alternative land use options need to remain open and voiced support of staff s recommendation to deny this application. Land Use and Planning Board Minutes November 27, 2000 Page 6 Brad Bell stated that although Polygon met some of the LU-27 policy requirements, in his opinion, they did not meet the requirements of LU-27.3 to "mitigate development in order to minimize impacts on viable agricultural lands." Mr. Bell voiced support of staff's recommendation to deny this request. David Malik stated that traffic impacts on the two lane 42nd Avenue will become severe with the addition of the current PUD of 650 houses, let alone the development of additional houses on the Pod H property. He reiterated concurrence with the other Board members statements and voiced support of staff s recommendation to deny this request. Jon Johnson stated that he concurs with the Board members to support staffs recommendation of DENIAL. Ron Harmon MOVED and Brad Bell SECONDED to accept staffs recommendation to DENY the application request for CPA-2000-2A/CPZ-2000-1 Kentview Pod H Amendment. Motion CARRIED. CPA-2000-2B/CPZ-2000-2 NGUYEN AMENDMENT Diana Nelson stated that this property is located at 12819 Kent Kangley Road. The existing plan designation is Low-Density Multifamily and the proposed plan designation is commercial. The existing zoning is MR-G Low-Density Multifamily Residential, 16 units per acre. Ms. Nelson stated that the proposed zoning is CC, Community Commercial. She stated that the property is one tax parcel of.35 acres configured in a triangular shape with public roads on two sides. A vacant single family residence currently occupies the site. Ms. Nelson stated that properties north and east of the site are zoned Community Commercial and developed with the Meridian Plaza Shopping Center, Value Village and office buildings. She stated that vacant property west of the subject property is zoned Professional and Office. Ms. Nelson stated that property directly south of the site is zoned MR-G and developed with a series of single family detached residences. She stated that the Springwood Apartment complex is beyond these residences, and directly east of the apartment complex a new Safeway store, gas station and several retail buildings are in the process of obtaining building permits. Ms. Nelson stated that there are no known sensitive areas located on the subject property. She stated that primary and current access from the property is 128th Place Southeast with future access from Kent Kangley Road being unlikely as it is a state highway and further access points would impede traffic flow. Ms. Nelson stated that a similar request to change the land use designation to commercial was submitted in 1998 and denied due to concerns regarding vehicular trip generation and safety. Ms. Nelson stated that in September and October 2000, the Washington Department of Transportation constructed road improvements on Kent Kangley at the intersection of 128th. The improvements included a meridian barrier between the east and west bound lanes with a channel left turn lane for westbound traffic to turn onto 128th. Ms. Nelson stated that the new road configuration allows: a right turn onto 128th from the eastbound lanes of Kent Kangley, a restricted left turn access from the westbound lanes to 128th Place, and a right turn exit from 128th into the eastbound lanes of Kent Kangley. Ms. Nelson stated that left turns from 128th into the westbound lanes of Kent Kangley are no longer permitted. Ms. Nelson stated that the site is located in an area of transition. Development and increased retail and commercial activity in the area surrounding the subject property are changing the nature of the neighborhood. She stated that the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan has several goals and policies directly relating to the development of existing commercial areas including: Goal LU-12 - "Promote orderly and efcient commercial growth within the existing commercial districts in order to maintain and strengthen existing commercial districts, to minimize costs associated with the extension of facilities, and allow businesses to benef t from their proximity to one another"and Land Use and Planning Board Minutes November 27, 2000 Page 7 Policy LU 12.3 "Develop regulatory incentives to encourage infill development in existing commercial areas... " and these regulatory incentives "may include urban, mixed-use zoning and higher density zones, planned unit developments, transfer of density credits, and streamlined permit processes. " Ms. Nelson stated that amending the land use designation and zoning to allow commercial use of this site would result in a minor expansion of the existing commercial area around the intersection of 132nd Ave. SE and Kent-Kangley Road. She stated that though the commercial development will result in some increase to the number of vehicle trips to the site, the recent traffic improvements including the addition of meridian barriers to Kent-Kangley Road greatly reduces the accident potential associated with gaining vehicular access to the subject property. Ms. Nelson stated that staff recommends APPROVAL of this request. Gary Gill, City of Kent Engineer stated that the primary work completed by the State Department of Transportation is to preclude the high accident problems that the city was encountering along the Kent- Kangley corridor both east and west of 132nd Avenue Southeast. Mr. Gill stated that the channelization, which restricts turning movements, was designed to address the types of accidents, which were occurring most frequently. He stated that the City felt that it would be appropriate to allow this property to develop as a commercial zone as the type of turning movements you would see from this establishment would be precluded, specifically the left turns out and the protected left turns in. Chair Jon Johnson declared the Public Hearing open. Roberta Marta, DBM Consulting Engineers, 502 16th Street NE, Suite 312, Auburn, WA stated that she represents the applicant Huy Nguyen who is requesting a change from Multifamily to Commercial in order to accommodate a beauty salon. She stated that commercial, office and professional surround the subject property. Ms. Marta stated that the site configuration is too small for a multifamily development consisting of 3.5 acres. She stated that a commercial zone would be entirely compatible from a zoning and planning perspective. Ms. Marta stated that the applicant intends to use the vacant single family structure on the site for his proposed salon. She stated that traffic improvements to Kent Kangley include curb cuts, right in and right out only, a landscape island and access will remain off 128th Avenue. Huy Nguyen, 24020 129th Court SE, Kent, WA 98031 as the applicant stated that he would encourage the Board to consider approval of his request to develop this site for use as a beauty salon as a means to support his family. Larry Flanary, 27021 128th Place Southeast, Kent, WA stated that he resides in the third house, south of the site. Mr. Flanary stated that he did not oppose Mr. Nguyen's request to develop his property for use as a commercial beauty salon. He voiced concern that if the subject property is zoned commercial that this could potentially lead to a commercial rezoning of his and the other residential properties south of the site. Mr. Flanary stated that he would not like to see his one-half acre lot rezoned as it would devalue the property and make the potential for future sales and financing difficult if commercially zoned. He stated that the way the topography of his property lies, the wetlands reach far into his property decreasing the ability to use half of his property. Dana Mower, DBM Consulting Engineers, 502 16 St. Northeast, Suite 312, Auburn, WA stated that this area is in transition and there is Office zoning to the west and Commercial zoning surrounding the property to the east and south. Land Use and Planning Board Minutes November 27, 2000 Page 8 Mr. Mower stated that Mr. Nguyen's property is the only site requesting a commercial rezone with residential properties existing south of the site, which includes Mr. Flanary's property. Mr. Mower stated that Mr. Nguyen's property consists of one third of an acre and combined with the residential properties to the south total two acres. He stated that the geography of the land indicates that it would be difficult to develop those residential sites in a multifamily configuration. He stated that the residents would be able to retain their current zoning at this time and perhaps convert to commercial in the future. Ron Harmon MOVED and Terry Zimmerman SECONDED to close the Public Hearing. Motion Carried. Board member, Brad Bell stated that DBM Consulting Engineers are clients of his to whom he provides consulting services. He stated that he has never spoken with them regarding these issues and does not provide them with land use consulting services. Mr. Bell stated that he does not believe that his business relationship with DBM constitutes a conflict of interest but would be willing to remove himself from voting on this rezone request if anyone objected to his participation. There were no objections from the Board. Ron Harmon MOVED and Terry Zimmerman SECONDED to accept staff s recommendation for APPROVAL of CPA-2000-2B/CPZ-2000-2 Nguyen Amendment application. Motion Carried. CPA-2000-2C/CPZ-2000-3 COBLENTZ AMENDMENT Diana Nelson stated that this property is located at south 222nd Street and 88th Avenue South. She stated that the site consists of four tax parcels covering an area of approximately 12.58 acres. She stated that approximately 3.5 acres of the subject property is currently zoned Commercial Manufacturing 1 (CM 1) with a land use designation of industrial. Approximately 9.08 acres is zoned SR-6, Single Family Residential, 6.05 units per acre with a plan designation of SF-6. Ms. Nelson stated that the applicants are requesting a proposed plan designation of Low-Density Multifamily and zoning of MR-G, Low Density Multifamily Residential, 16 units per acre. This site is located at the base of East Hill, adjacent to State Route 167,north of where the highway crosses over Central Avenue. Ms. Nelson stated that there is a single-family residence and an accessory building currently occupying the site. She stated that a significant portion of the property is encumbered with slopes exceeding 25%. Ms. Nelson stated that development of this eastern portion of the property would be severely limited due to the severe slope hazard. Ms. Nelson stated that the area to the south of this property is currently zoned MR-G and is under development with the Silver Springs Apartment complex containing 251 units. She stated that single family detached zoning and land use designations are located north and east of the site with SF-6 north and east. Ms. Nelson stated that State Route 167 provides a barrier to the west of the property and the slopes on the eastern one-third of the property provide a separator between this site and the adjacent properties on the hill above. She stated that several single family dwellings are in the area, zoned SR-6 to the north with two of these properties having split land use designations of Industrial with CM-1 zoning in addition to the residential designation. Ms. Nelson stated that the land use designations and zoning on a portion of the subject site were changed in 1997 to Industrial and CM-1. This change occurred because of difficulty marketing the property for single family development due to the freeway noise. Ms. Nelson stated that the applicant is now requesting a change to MR-G, Low Density Multifamily for the same reason. She stated that the average daily traffic along South 228th is approximately 8300 vehicles. Ms. Nelson stated that this development would add approximately 2,000 additional daily vehicles and 198 p.m. peak hour trips to the local street system. Ms. Nelson stated that the proposed South 228th Corridor project will include a bridge across SR 167 to connect in the general vicinity of the southwest comer of the parcel. She stated that the precise alignment of Land Use and Planning Board Minutes November 27, 2000 Page 9 this corridor has not been determined so that the potential impacts to the subject property, because of the corridor project, cannot be determined at this time. She stated that the east leg of the proposed 228th Corridor is planned to cross over SR-167 and connect to the East Hill somewhere in this location. Ms. Nelson stated that noise from SR-167 has some impact on the site. However, other residential development exists along this corridor. Ms. Nelson stated that the applicant's request for this zoning would allow 201 multifamily units to be developed on the property based on zoning alone. She stated that the current maximum residential density of this site would allow approximately 54 single-family dwellings. However, the topography, slope setbacks, the minimum lot size of 5700 square feet, dedication of public roads and the lack of clustering provisions for single family development in the zoning code would effectively reduce this number by at least half. Ms. Nelson stated that the City wishes to increase home ownership opportunities and promote single family residential development at all levels of affordability. She stated that the City has recently created a Multifamily Townhouse zone that is intended to be in fill and transition between multifamily and single family zones and help to provide more affordable home ownership options. Ms. Nelson stated that two-story condominium development in this area would act as a buffer and a transition area between the single-family zones to the north and east and the four-story apartment complex development to the south. She stated that the Townhouse zone allows clustering which would maximize the density of 12 or 16 units per acre while preserving the area with steep slopes. Ms. Nelson stated that the comprehensive plan designation of Low Density Multifamily applies both to MR- G, the zone the applicant is requesting, and MR-T,the zone that staff is recommending. Approval of the Low Density Multifamily Land Use Designation and SR-8 zoning would allow the applicant to request a rezone to MR-T 12, 16 or MRG, particularly when there is further information regarding the location of the corridor. Ms. Nelson stated that staff recommends APPROVAL of SR-8 zoning and Low Density Multifamily land use designation which would then allow the applicant to later apply for a rezone upon approval of this comp plan amendment request. Ms. Nelson clarified for Ms. Woodford that staff is recommending a rezone of the applicant's property to SR- 8 without contingencies to change the zoning to MR-T at this time. Ms. Nelson stated that although staff could tie the SR-8 zone to the MR-T zone, they do not specifically recommend taking this action in light of the fact that the corridor is going to have major impacts on this property. Ms.Nelson stated that staff believes it would be more appropriate to let the City Council make the ultimate decision on the applicant's rezone request, when the City may have additional information in respect to the corridor impacts. Ms. Nelson stated that by leaving the zoning options open with the applicant's request and staffs recommendation for a land use designation of Low Density Multifamily, the applicant would have the option to request MR-T 12, MR-T 16 or MRG zoning at a future date. She stated that as staff gathers further information from Public Works over the next few months, staffs recommendation on specific zoning might change based on where the corridor is placed in conjunction with the subject property. Gary Gill stated that the 228th Street Corridor Project is included in the City of Kent 2001-2006 Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program. Mr. Gill spoke about the current plans for construction of the corridor as well as the studies underway to analyze potential traffic impacts in the area of the proposed corridor that could substantially affect the subject property. Jon Johnson declared the Public Hearing open. Dana Mower, 502 16th St. Northeast, Suite 312, Auburn, WA 98002 submitted a copy of his summary dated November 27, 2000 for the record as Exhibit#8. Land Use and Planning Board Minutes November 27, 2000 Page 10 Mr. Mower stated that if the subject property is rezoned MR-G, this would limit structure heights to 35 feet. He stated that if the property is rezoned MR-T, with a townhouse configuration, the structure would be limited to two stories. Mr. Mower stated that the Coblentz's property meets the criteria for development as low density multifamily as outlined in the 1990 Growth Management Act's urban growth policy. He stated that the urban growth policy encourages development in urban areas where adequate public utilities and services exist or can be provided in an efficient manner. Mr. Mower stated that water, sewer, storm drainage and road system infrastructures are in place and available to this site with the capability of supporting a high-density development. He stated that employment opportunities exist in close proximity. Mr. Mower stated that there is a shortage of high quality affordable housing in Kent. He stated that this proposal meets the Growth Management Act's Policy#4 to "encourage the availability of affordable housing for all economic segments of the population of the State. Promote a variety of residential densities and housing types, encourage preservation of existing housing stock." Mr. Mower stated that this proposal meets buffering criteria as indicated in the comprehensive plan. Mr. Mower stated that the top of the bluff reaches approximately 225 feet above sea level and that the highest area of the site to be developed is about 125 feet. He stated that there is approximately a 300 to 400 foot horizontal separation between the single-family development to the east and the project. Mr. Mower stated that the City owns the five-acre site to the north and it is developed with a well. Mr. Mower stated that the most significant health, safety and welfare concern with this site is the elevated noise levels. He stated that Mr. Carl Bloom; an environmental analyst metered noise levels on site, which indicated levels substantially above the Washington Department of Transportation's (WDOT) minimum requirements for single family residential ownership. Mr. Mower stated that WDOT has indicated that they would only approve of commercial, multifamily or retail type of development on this site. Mr. Mower clarified with Ms. Woodford that as the developer for this site he intends to develop this property as MR-G with no intention to reapply for a MR-T Town home zoning with the Board's concurrence. Greg Heath, 2214 Tacoma Road, Puyallup, WA stated that he owns Heath and Associates, a traffic- engineering firm in Puyallup, which serves the Puget Sound area. Mr. Heath stated that under existing zoning, the subject site could accommodate approximately 35,000 square feet of industrial development and approximately 72 single-family units. He stated that based on this type of development, he calculated that about 1000 daily trips and 100 p.m. peak hour vehicular trips would be generated. Mr. Heath indicated that if this site were developed with a 175-unit apartment complex,that peak hour trips would increase to 112. Ken Koss, 600 108th Avenue NE, #600,Bellevue, WA 98004 stated that he develops multifamily projects with the intent of building, managing and holding the developments as long term investments. Mr. Koss stated that when his company came to Kent they completed a ten-year feasibility study from 1995 to 2005, which indicated the need for additional 1191 multifamily housing units. Mr. Koss stated that his company hired the firm Hopson and Ferini who generate a quarterly housing need assessment of the Seattle Metropolitan area. He stated that Hopson and Ferini's report indicated that an additional 300 multifamily units would be needed from second quarter 2000 to the second quarter of 2001. Mr. Koss stated that his analysis supports a rezone to multifamily for the subject site. Betty Coblentz, 22320 88th Avenue South, Kent,WA 98031 stated that she owns the subject site and is a real estate agent by profession. She stated that a residential group home sits north of the property, then two residences. Ms. Coblentz stated that she represents the two neighbors north of the site; Wahlers and Longstroms. Ms. Coblentz submitted a letter from the Longstroms for the record as Exhibit#9. She stated that the neighbors support development of the subject site and are requesting that their properties blend into the rezone as well. She stated that marketing the Longstrom and Wahler's residences for resale has been impossible due to the high noise volume. Ms. Coblentz stated that a property appraiser indicated that the Land Use and Planning Board Minutes November 27, 2000 Page 11 neighboring residences would not sell residential due to the noise levels and was unable to attach a dollar value to those properties. Ms. Coblentz stated that she inquired if WDOT would erect sound barriers at the time the 228th Street Corridor was constructed. She stated that WDOT indicated that it is not cost affective to build sound barriers for only three houses. She stated that the City approved a rezone for the front portion of our site to Industrial Commercial in 1997, with the back portion of the site remaining residential. Ms. Coblentz stated that this rezone discouraged development of residential or commercial on this site as it meant that egress and ingress to the residential area would have to run through the Industrial portion of the site. In response to Ms. Zimmerman, Ms. Coblentz stated that people would rent apartments rather then purchase a town home in this area even with high noise levels. She stated that because apartment dwellers typically move more frequently than homeowners do, the effects of high noise levels would not be a deterrent. Carl Bloom, 422 30th Avenue, Seattle, OVA 98122 stated that he owns Environmental Analysis, an air quality noise consulting firm. Mr. Bloom stated that he measured existing noise levels on the Coblentz property over a 24-hour period, comparing those levels to existing noise regulations and criteria of other cities. Mr. Bloom stated that results of his study indicated that multifamily housing such as apartment complexes would best suit this site and is compatible with noise levels allowed in commercially zoned properties. Mr. Bloom stated that according to the WDOT, elevated noise levels affect the Coblentz property and would not be compatible for residential development. He stated that Housing and Urban Development (HUD) analyzes noise levels over a 24 hour period and adds a penalty of ten decibels to night time hours. Mr. Bloom stated that HUD typically would not lend money to develop properties with day/night noise levels higher than _ 75 decibels. Mr. Bloom stated that HUD would lend money for properties, which exhibit noise levels between 65 and 75 decibels when architectural enhancements are included in the development to reduce interior noise levels in those developments. Mr. Bloom stated that some special enhancements could include enhanced windows or using masonry or concrete panel facings. Mr. Bloom stated that the Coblentz property shows day/night levels of 76 decibels. Mr. Bloom stated that if WDOT were to identify noise levels along the 228th Street Corridor, they would be required to mitigate noise impacts most likely with sound barrier walls. Ron Harmon MOVED and Brad Bell SECONDED to close the Public Hearing. Motion CARRIED. Steve Dowell voiced concern over traffic impact and trip generation increases to 228th and Central Avenue based on development of the Coblentz property, including the currently developed MR-H properties, and the multifamily development(currently under construction on the MR-G property)next to the Coblentz site. In response to Mr. Dowell, Mr. Gill stated that Kent's traffic engineers estimate that development of the Coblentz property would generate an increase of approximately 80 peak hour trips. He stated that based on an estimated final build-out of 1,000 units combining the Coblentz property and surrounding properties, this could generate 600 peak hour vehicular trips in the area. Mr. Gill stated that currently 228th Street, East of Central Avenue handles approximately 8,300 daily vehicular trips. He stated that based on this statistic, he estimates additional 1,500 total daily trips and 80 peak hour trips could be generated. Mr. Gill stated that 228th Street is a collector arterial roadway and that the estimated trips would not over tax that classification of road. He stated that 228th could easily accommodate over 10,000 to 15,000 vehicles a day on a road of that classification. Terry Zimmerman stated that it seems that there are ways to mitigate noise levels for apartment complexes as well as ways to construct the 228th Street corridor,bridge and columns that would not impact development on Land Use and Planning Board Minutes November 27, 2000 Page 12 the Coblentz property. She stated that Kent needs more apartments and housing for low income families and voiced her support of staff s recommendation to approve the zoning change. Brad Bell MOVED and Sharon Woodford SECONDED to adopt staff s recommendation to APPROVE CPA- 2000-2(C)/CPZ-2000-3 Coblentz Amendment with SR-8 zoning and Low Density Multi Family land use designation. Motion CARRIED. Chair Johnson stated that the Board needs to reconsider their previous vote concerning the Coblentz Amendment. City Attorney, Arthur Patrick Fitzpatrick recommended tabling the Coblentz Amendment until the end of the Public Hearing Session and then revisit the motion. Steve Dowell MOVED and David Malik SECONDED to table the Coblentz Motion until the end of the Hearing. Motion CARRIED. #CPA-2000-2(E)/CPZ-2000-5 Ranniger Amendment Ms. Nelson stated that the Ranniger property is located at the northeast and southwest corners of the intersection of 132nd Avenue Southeast and Southeast 256th. The existing plan designations is SF-6, Single Family, six units per acre and the proposed plan designation is Commercial or Mixed Use Restricted. The existing zoning is SR 4.5, Single Family Residential, 4.5 units per acre for the two parcels on the northeast corner and SR-6, Single Family Residential, 6.05 units per acre for the three parcels in the southwest comer. Ms. Nelson stated that the proposed zoning is Professional and Office. She stated that the total area is approximately 4.15 acres and located on diagonally opposite corners of the intersection. Ms. Nelson stated that there are four existing single family detached residences located on the property with two on each corner. She stated that there are no inventoried wetlands on the site. Ms. Nelson stated that the area surrounding the subject property is residential in nature as all the zoning and land uses in the vicinity are residential. Ms. Nelson stated that there are no abutting commercial or office zoning or existing developments on or near the subject property. She stated that existing commercial developments are located less than one mile away both north of the site at the intersection of 132nd Avenue and Southeast 240th and south of the site at the intersection of 132nd Avenue and Kent Kangley Road. Ms. Nelson stated that existing office zoning is located approximately one mile to the south on the south side of Kent Kangley west of the shopping center and 1.25 to 1.5 miles west of the site along southeast 256th Street in several locations along 104th Avenue Southeast. Ms. Nelson stated that primary access to the site would come from either or both Southeast 256th and 132nd Avenue Southeast. She stated that both streets are classified as minor arterials. She stated that neither public street is improved to its design standard. Ms. Nelson stated that a project to improve traffic flow on Southeast 256th is currently under construction with major work planned for the intersection at 132nd Avenue. She stated that current average daily traffic along Southeast 256th is approximately 15,700 vehicles and along 132nd Avenue Southeast approximately 17,600 vehicles. Ms. Nelson stated that the proposed rezone has a potential to add an estimated 600 to 830 daily vehicle trips and 77 p.m,peak hour trips to the local street system. Ms. Nelson stated that the vast majority of development along both 132nd and Southeast 256th is residential subdivisions with the backyards abutting these streets. She stated that most subdivisions within the city abut at least one arterial street. Ms. Nelson stated that city development patterns do not support the conversion of residentially zoned property in the middle of a single-family neighborhood to an office zone based solely on traffic concerns. Ms. Nelson stated that a rezone of this property would effectively generate a significant amount of additional traffic on both of these arterials beyond that which would be created by single family development. She stated that the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan has several goals and policies relating to the Land Use and Planning Board Minutes November 27, 2000 Page 13 1 development of existing commercial areas rather than creating new ones. Ms. Nelson stated that these goals include: Goal LU-12 to "promote orderly and efficient commercial growth within the existing commercial districts in order to maintain and strengthen existing commercial districts, to minimize costs associated with extension of facilities, and to allow businesses to benefit from their proximity to one another. - and Policy LU-12.3 "Develop regulatory incentives to encourage infill development in existing commercial areas. Regulatory incentives may include urban, mixed-use zoning and higher density zones, planned unit developments, transfer of density credits, and streamlined permit processes. " Ms. Nelson stated that the office zone allows a variety of office and service uses most of which are also permitted in the Community Commercial (CC) zone. She stated that the subject property is located between two existing commercial areas which are not built out to maximum capacity. Ms. Nelson stated undeveloped property with existing office zoning is located to the south as well as one to two miles west of the site. She stated that along 104th Avenue several vacant parcels with existing office zoning are for sale. Ms. Nelson stated that in addition, at least two developed medical dental offices/complexes have available space advertised for rent or lease. Ms. Nelson stated that other methods are available to generate additional office availability other than creating an additional commercial node in the middle of a residential area. She stated that the addition of the office uses such as medical/dental clinics to the Community Commercial zone by a zoning code amendment would allow for more office availability in locations more compatible with the City's desired development patterns. Therefore, staff recommends DENIAL of this request. Jon Johnson declared the Public Hearing open. Jerry Klein, 823 Joshua Green Building, Seattle, WA 98101-2236 stated that he is the attorney representing Leo Brutsche who is the owner of the properties on the southwest corner of this intersection. He stated that Mr. Brutsche strongly supports the application for a rezone amendment. Mr. Klein stated that the applicant, Mr. Ranniger is in the same position as Mr. Brutsche who has lived in this area for a long time. He stated that Mr. Ranniger has been a physician in the East Hill area for 30 years and many people appreciate having access to his medical services in the community. Mr. Klein urged the Board to consider this information in their evaluation. Mr. Klein stated that the Kent Code Section 12.02.050 specifies three considerations in reviewing your consideration of the proposed amendment. • That the amendment will not result in development that will adversely effect the public health, safety or general welfare, and • That the amendment be based on new information from that which was available when the comp plan was adopted,and • That the amendment be consistent with the other goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Klein stated that he can not conceive of anything that would be more beneficial for the public health than a physician. He stated that the proposed amendment would not create any adverse environmental consequences on the property. Mr. Klein stated that with regard to new information, the entire Meridian, Soos Creek area was annexed in 1996 with substantial development following such as Bayberry Crest. He stated that the most profound change is the widening of 256th and 132nd, turning these roads into major arterials. Mr. Klein stated that the Soos Creek area is included within the Urban Growth Area. He stated that based on the aforementioned facts,there has been a plethora of development since adoption of the comprehensive plan. Mr. Klein spoke about the consistency of the proposed amendment as it relates to the comprehensive plan. He stated that LU-13.4 &.5 speak about having neighborhood facilities available while maintaining convenient pedestrian oriented access to these facilities within the small neighborhood communities. Land Use and Planning Board Minutes November 27, 2000 Page 14 Mr. Klein stated that staff referred to land use Goal LU-12 that encourages infill development in commercial areas. He stated that he does not believe that this infill policy is applicable to this subject property and does not agree with staff s report that there is any problem with our zoning code or with our comprehensive plan. Mr. Klein stated that it is important to understand why medical facilities are not included within the NCC, Neighborhood Commercial Centers or the CC, Community Commercial Centers. Mr. Klein stated that the potential exists of having people with contagious diseases entering busy commercial areas, therefore, it makes sense to provide neighborhood facilities such as the medical facility Dr. Ranniger is proposing in less dense areas. Fred Mendosa, 555 West Smith Street, Kent, WA stated that he represents Mr. Ranniger as his attorney. Mr. Mendosa reiterated that Mr. Ranninger has worked on the East Hill for thirty years as a family practitioner with one other doctor in his office. He stated that Mr. Ranninger needs to expand his practice and believes that East Hill could use two or three additional family practitioners as the burgeoning population grows. Mr. Mendosa stated that he could not expand his current location because of its zoning. He stated that Mr. Ranninger has opted to sell a portion of his property where his medical practice is located and seek a new location where he can expand his facility. Mr. Mendosa stated that a medical office is not permitted in the commercial zone. He stated that when staff s report states that there are a variety of uses that can be placed in a commercial setting, a medical office is not one of them. Mr. Mendosa stated that very little office space exists on East Hill that would be suitable for this medical office. Mr. Mendosa stated that the proposed site is not located in the middle of a major neighborhood. He stated that wetlands exist near the proposed site. Mr. Mendosa stated that the impending traffic improvements to 132nd and 256th would include channelization and curbing. It is going to be difficult for anybody who owns one of the single family residences on the proposed site, to apply for a permit that would allow them to build anything that would provide access to the property other then a right-in or right-out access. Mr. Mendosa stated that there are major bus routes moving both directions on 132nd and 256th that could provide access to a medical facility on the proposed site. Ted Nixon, 911 East Temperance Street, Kent, WA stated that a total of 6.1 square miles of city land is located east of the Benson Highway of which 68.8 acres is zoned"O". He stated that 25% of the "O" zoning is designated wetlands, 30% of the land is Sequoia Junior High School and 55% of the "O" zoning on East Hill is not buildable for office use. Mr. Nixon stated that "O" zoning was designed to be compatible with residential neighborhoods per the Zoning Code. He stated that the maximum site coverage for Office zoning is 30% compared to CC or NC zoning at 40% or Downtown Commercial zoning at 100%. Mr. Nixon spoke at length on setback and landscape requirements in the "O" zone. Mr. Nixon stated that the current separation distances between the two major intersections, in relation to the subject property, appear to be two miles. He stated that current planning suggests that those separation distances should be no more than a half-mile apart to maintain a village concept within walking distance from the residential areas. Mr. Nixon stated that the subject property should be developed in a manner compatible to the neighborhood. He stated that Dr. Ranniger is a valuable asset on East Hill and should be located in the heart of the community that he serves. Christopher Brown, 9688 Rainier Avenue South, Seattle, WA 98118 stated that he is a licensed engineer. He stated that if the subject property sites, located diagonally opposite each other on the intersection, are developed with single family residences, it could be difficult to gain access to these properties. Mr. Brown Land Use and Planning Board Minutes November 27, 2000 Page 15 stated that the development of the northeast quadrant would generate about 57 vehicular trips per day and approximately 134 vehicular trips in the southwest quadrant. Mr. Brown stated that the northeast quadrant would generate 6 peak hour trips and the southeast corner approximately 14-peak hour trips. He stated that rezoning the northeast quadrant for use as a medical/dental facility and the southwest quadrant for use as an office facility would increase the traffic volume by approximately 567 vehicular daily trips. Mr. Brown stated that his calculations closely align with staffs report of approximately 600 to 800 daily trips. Mr. Brown referred to Kent's Development Assistant Brochure Section 6.3, in elaborating upon minimum comer clearance standards as they relate to the subject properties and how to eliminate adverse traffic flow elements at signalized intersections that would impede traffic. Mr. Brown stated that there is no way to access at least three of the lots on the northwest quadrant if developed with single family other than right-in and right-out. He stated that the same condition exists on the southwest quadrant. Mr. Brown spoke at length on alternative design elements for access to the subject properties. He stated that the existing zoning and staffs proposal for the subject property creates an impossible land use development situation as well as creating the potential for traffic movement hazards. James Marso, 34815 Pacific Highway, Federal Way, WA stated that he is a real estate broker for ReMax Realty West representing Roy and Deanna Gitchel in the sale of their property located on the northeast comer of 256th and 132nd. Avenue Southeast. He stated that he marketed the property in various venues displaying a prominent sign identifying the zoning and development potential in the SR-4.5 zoning. Mr. Marso stated that every inquiry was met with resistance to the plan that we proposed. He stated that four months into the process, Dr. Dan Ranninger and his wife came along with a different concept for this particular intersection. Mr. Marso stated that if a developer were able to overcome all the mechanical details associated with locating driveways close to intersections, this intersection is still unsuitable as a residential neighborhood. He stated that there is daily vehicular travel at this intersection of 15,000 cars in one direction and 17,000 cars in another direction. He stated that the speed at which cars travel in this area typically exceed the 25 mile per hour speed limit posing safety risks to the children in the area. He stated that the volume of noise at 132nd and 256th would deter people from purchasing in this area. Mr. Marso stated that the development of a medical office would create an excellent buffer for the residential neighborhood surrounding it. He stated that this type of development presents an excellent and orderly transition for the community while recognizing the growth of the Kent area and the need for more office space on East Hill. He stated that he supports the applicant's request for a rezone. Dr. Ranninger, Kent, WA stated that he and his partner, Dr. Linda Geer, in contemplating the need for two additional partners,they estimated the need for twice the square footage as they currently have. He stated that the present plan drawn up by Mr. Nixon includes just 2200 square feet. Mr. Ranniger stated that he felt the lot at the intersection of 132nd and 256th would be a good location to construct his facility. He stated that in looking at the Gitchel's home,he determined that it would not be suitable for conversion to an office. Mr. Ranniger stated that he entered an earnest money agreement with Mr. Gitchel contingent upon approval of a 2200 square foot office. Mr. Ranniger stated that he did not intend to become embroiled in controversy. He stated that the addition of a medical facility on the subject property would be an amenity to the community. Mr. Ranniger stated that at the time he prepared his proposal to the City of Kent for a rezone request, he was informed that you could not spot rezone. He stated that he was told to include a bigger plan, which would add to the comprehensive plan. He stated that at the inception of this application, he was advised to include Mr. Brutsche's property as part of the application proposal, therefore encompassing parcels of land on two comers. Land Use and Planning Board Minutes November 27, 2000 Page 16 Roy Gitchel, 18703 Southeast May Valley Road, #A, Issaquah, WA 98027 stated that he has resided on the property at the intersection of 132nd and 256th since 1979. He stated that his property has been reduced from 1.5 acres to less than lacre due to the widening of 132nd and 256th. Mr. Gitchel stated that his property has deteriorated as a single-family residence and the zoning has changed from multiple units and apartments down to 4.5 units per acre. Mr. Gitchel stated that the only available access to his property is right-turn in and right-turn out. He stated that once the city completes its street improvements, a solid island would be constructed past the property with no possibility of access to the property. Mr. Gitchel stated that Mr. Ranniger is the first person who has shown interest in his property since it was listed for sale in May. He voiced his support of the Ranninger's rezone request. Beverly Riedler, 13110 SE 258th Street, Kent, WA 98031 stated that her residence abuts the southwest comer of the Brutsche property. She stated that the Brutsche's are requesting a rezone to Commercial as they did two years ago, at which time their rezone request was denied. Ms. Riedler stated that traffic continues to increase and accessing 132nd Avenue from her community from 258th Avenue has become dangerous. She stated that the addition of a commercial development would increase traffic congestion and disrupt the quiet nature of their traditional neighborhood where she has resided for 12 years. She stated that the Bayberry Crest community located west of her neighborhood is quiet and would like to see that the nature of that community be maintained. Ms. Riedler spoke about her concerns with increased noise, pollution and water drainage run off if commercial development were to occur on the subject site. She stated that commercial business traffic would pose safety factors for children walking to and from Meridian Elementary School. Ms. Riedler stated that many of Dr. Ranniger's patients would be traveling from outlying areas to his facility as many HMO insurance plans dictate the preferred care provider that a patient can use. She stated that she could not see how Dr. Ranninger would increase his patient base by locating his medical office within this community. Ms. Riedler stated that commercial facilities are already easily accessible from their residential community without the need to add additional commercial development. Ms. Riedler submitted Letters signed by her neighbors, for the record as Exhibits #11 through #18. Lee Robertson, 13104 SE 258th, Kent, WA 98031 spoke of his concerns over traffic issues and the difficulties experienced by the residents in accessing 132nd Avenue from their respective neighborhoods. Mr. Robertson stated that Dr. Ranninger currently owns property at 116th and 240th where he could apply for a rezone for a medical office. He stated that medical facilities currently exist at 240th and 132nd Avenue. Mr. Robertson stated that commercial development does not guarantee what will end up in your community as eventually businesses may convert to other uses. He stated that he has resided in this community for 13 years and voiced his support to retain current zoning. Kathy Baskin, 25630 130th Avenue Southeast, Kent,WA submitted a letter she had addressed to the Land Use and Planning Board for the record as Exhibit #19 and a letter signed by Dana and Robert Cox and Shelley Lindsay for the record as Exhibit #20. She stated that she resides in Bayberry Crest. Ms. Baskin stated that although she does not believe it was Dr. Ranninger's intent to offend anyone, she is offended. Ms. Baskin stated that her community has been dismissed as insignificant and unsubstantial which is not true. She stated that she sat on a City of Kent School District committee to consider expanding their boundaries as the number of residential neighborhoods on East Hill have increased. Ms. Baskin stated that new schools have been constructed to accommodate the increase. She stated that this does not imply insignificance. Land Use and Planning Board Minutes November 27, 2000 Page 17 Ms. Baskin stated that improvements to the roadway has been to increase it to a three lane road with a two- way left rum lane from 116th to 132nd Avenue which includes a bike lane that accesses the Soos Creek Trail. Ms. Baskin stated that she is concerned for the safety and welfare of her children as well as all the children in her community specifically with the increase in traffic that would occur with a commercial development. She stated that the southwest corner of the subject property backs up to a storm water retention pond. She stated that the pond backs up to some of my neighbors and is located 20 feet from her deck. She voiced concern that if the subject property was developed as a commercial site, the water volume in the water retention pond could increase, thereby flooding their land decreasing property values. Ms. Baskin stated that a commercial business could not be contained in an 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. scenario, as the potential exists for alarm system activation 24 hours per day with the possibility of no response. This scenario exemplifies the fact that quality of life would be compromised and that stress levels could elevate for the residents living in the adjoining communities. She asked the Board to consider staff s recommendation to DENY this rezone request. Darrell Baskin, 25630 130th Avenue Southeast, Kent, WA 98031 submitted a letter and map of the Bayberry Subdivision addressed to the Land Use and Planning Board for the record as Exhibit# 21. Mr. Baskin stated that he resides in Bayberry Crest and is the president of their homeowner's association. He stated that he represents their community in stating that a commercial development is not warranted, not needed and not desired by their community. He stated that the Bayberry Crest is an upscale community consisting of 48 homes ranging in value from $200,000. to $300,000 and this area needed to be retained solely as single family residential.. A commercial development would devalue these properties and affect quality of life. Mr. Baskin stated that he believed when the City of Kent planned the road improvements from 116th easterly just beyond 132nd, they did not consider the development of commercial office buildings nor a zoning change. He believes that a commercial project would be incompatible with the current roadway system. Mr. Baskin reiterated his concern over the storm water retention pond and how water run off from a potential commercial development could be an issue for mitigation. Mr. Baskin stated that he would urge the Board to retain this area as residential and voiced his support of staffs recommendation to DENY this request. Mike Wilcox, 25506 132nd Avenue Southeast, Kent, WA 98042 stated that his residence is north of the subject property. He stated that he and his wife are raising 10 children and voiced concern that the quality of life would diminish with the development of a commercial center and that traffic would increase dramatically. Mr. Wilcox stated that his property is close to the northern boundary of the subject property and if commercial development is approved, their property could be devalued. He stated that a five-acre parcel of land exists north of our site. Mr. Wilcox said that he could foresee a developer purchasing the five acres, his land, and the subject comer property to develop a well-planned single family community. Mr. Wilcox voiced his support to DENY this application request.. Shelly Lindsay, 12927 SE 257th Street, Kent, WA 98031 submitted a letter from the Gisth Family as Exhibit#22, from the Greening Family as Exhibit#23 and from the Teasley Family as Exhibif#24 for the record. Ms. Lindsay stated that road improvements which have occurred near the subject property did not take into consideration impacts to the area. If this property were rezoned to commercial, vehicular traffic would increase on a road system that already experiences high volumes of vehicular travel. The ambience of the residential community would be threatened. Noise levels would increase. Ms. Lindsay spoke on behalf of her neighbor who is an office manager for a thriving dental business in Kent on Central Avenue. She stated that none of the patients who use this dental service lives near that business. Land Use and Planning Board Minutes November 27, 2000 Page 18 Ms. Lindsay emphasized that the success of a medical or dental practice does not depend on the proximity of its patients but the professional skill of those who practice there. Ms. Lindsay stated that she is a nurse and sensitive to the needs of office or medical personnel. She stated that a medical facility in their neighborhood would have negative impacts to the residents, reiterating some of the same concerns spoken of by her neighbors. Ms. Lindsay stated that their residence would suffer from decreased property values and the ability to sell their home. Ms. Lindsay urged the Board to protect the quality of their neighborhood and voiced her support to recommend DENIAL of the applicant's request for a rezone. Ken Teasley, 25716 130th Avenue Southeast, Kent, WA 98031 stated that he has lived in Kent 16 years and resides in the Bayberry Crest community. He stated that his family made a sizeable investment when moving to Bayberry Crest and would like to see that this areas is maintained as residential only. Mr. Teasley stated that the any commercialization in this area is in direct conflict with the quality of life that they experience as a residential community. He stated that if the subject property were developed with fast food restaurants, providing all night drive through windows, he and other residents would be subjected to the noise and would no longer have the freedom to keep their windows open at night. Mr. Teasley asked the Board to consider staffs recommendation to DENY the applicant's request. Ron Harmon MOVED and Brad Bell SECONDED to close the Public Hearing. Motion carried. Sharon Woodford empathized with Mr. Gitchel's concern that his property would potentially be difficult to develop. She stated that it would not benefit the community to incorporate a medical facility on the subject property as the potential for disease exposure to the surrounding residents would increase and vehicular traffic would increase congestion in this area. Ms. Woodford stated that she is concerned about what would be proposed for the southwest comer of the subject property, as this property could be developed with something other than office. Ms. Nelson stated that the City of Kent's Professional and Office zone functions under two land use designations; Mixed Use Restricted with a Professional and Office zone as well as Commercial with a Professional Office zone. Ms. Nelson stated that if the land use designation was commercial, the potential exists to rezone the Professional and Office zone to Community Commercial or General Commercial. Ms. Woodford voiced her support of staff's recommendation to DENY the applicant's request. Steve Dowell stated that he concurs with Ms. Woodford in recommending DENIAL of the applicant's request. Terry Zimmerman said that she is a former resident of this neighborhood stating that she was impressed with the high caliber of the Bayberry Crest Community. She stated that she would not support commercial development for this area. Ms. Zimmerman stated that she supports staff s recommendation to DENY the applicant's request. Ron Harmon stated that he supports staff s recommendation for DENIAL of the applicant's request. Brad Bell said that he resides by Lake Meridian and is familiar with the area. Mr. Bell acknowledged Dr. Ranniger's value to the community but voiced his concurrence with the residents in supporting staff s recommendation for DENIAL. David Malik stated that he supports staffs recommendation for DENIAL. Land Use and Planning Board Minutes November 27, 2000 Page 19 Jon Johnson stated that it has been proven that single family development is compatible along major arterials and felt that the subject property could be designed to accommodate attractive single family parcels. Mr. Johnson stated that he supports staff s recommendation for DENIAL. Ron Harmon MOVED and Terry Zimmerman SECONDED to support staff s recommendation to DENY- CPA-2000-2(E)/CPZ-2000-5 Ranniger Amendment. Motion CARRIED. CPA-2000-2(C)/CPZ-2000-3 COBLENTZ AMENDMENT Mr. Fitzpatrick stated that after careful consideration and consultation with another attorney, this amendment has already been heard and considered by the Board. He stated that the purpose of the public hearing is to allow for public testimony, which occurred. Mr. Fitzpatrick stated that the Legal department recommends if the Board wishes to reconsider their motion they will have to move to reopen the matter, then move to withdraw the prior decision and finally move to make a new decision. David Malik MOVED and Terry Zimmerman SECONDED to remove CPA-2000-2(C)/CPZ-2000-3 Coblentz Amendment from the table. Motion CARRIED. A motion to reconsider the Board's original action failed. The Board's previous motion STANDS as follows: Brad Bell MOVED and Sharon Woodford SECONDED to adopt staff s recommendation to APPROVE CPA- 2000-2(C)/CPZ-2000-3 Coblentz Amendment with SR-8 zoning and Low Density Multi Family land use designation. Motion CARRIED. CPA-2000-2(F) KENT/FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DISTRICT CAPITALFACQlTIES PLAN ANIIIVDMENT' Senior Planner, Charlene Anderson stated that this plan requires a yearly update. She stated that the Federal Way School District is proposing an amendment to their school impact fees. Ms. Anderson stated that staff is recommending approval of the Kent and Federal Way School District's Capital Facilities Text Amendment. CPA-2000-2(G)CITY OF KENT CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN AMENDMENT Charlene Anderson stated that this plan requires a yearly update. She stated that the capital facilities element goes into the city's annual budget and is approved for cost and revenue issues. Ms. Anderson stated that there were some changes from the November 8 Capital Facilities Plan for the City of Kent with the addition of some transportation and utilities projects. Ms. Anderson stated that staff is recommending APPROVAL of the City of Kent Capital Facilities Text Amendment. Jon Johnson declared the Public Hearing open. Fred High,Executive Director for Kent school district, Kent,WA stated that in deference to the late hour he would not present a summary but would answer any questions from the Board. Steve Dowell MOVED and Terry Zimmerman SECONDED to close the Public Hearing. Motion CARRIED. Steve Dowell MOVED and Terry Zimmerman SECONDED to send CPA-2000-2(F) Kent/Federal Way School District Capital Facilities Plan Amendment and CPA-2000-2(G) City of Kent Capital Facilities Plan Amendment on to City Council without a recommendation. Motion CARRIED. Fred Satterstrom announced Diana Nelson's departure from the City of Kent to accept a principal planner position with the City of Lakewood and wished her well. ELECTION OF OFFICERS Chair Johnson opened the meeting for nominations. Land Use and Planning Board Minutes November 27,2000 Page 20 Brad Bell NOMINATED and David Malik SECONDED a motion to appoint Terry Zimmerman to the position of Chair. Terry Zimmerman accepted. Ron Harmon NOMINATED and Brad Bell SECONDED a motion to appoint Sharon Woodford to the position of Vice Chair. Sharon Woodford accepted. ADJOURNMENT Terry Zimmerman MOVED and Sharon Woodford SECONDED to adjourn the meeting. Motion CARRIED. Chair Jon Johnson adjourned the meeting at 11:35 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, F96d N. Satterstrom, AICP Secretary City of Kent, Washington 2001 - 2006 Preliminary Capital Facilities Plan 440 Ao�� KEN T W A S H I N G T O N November 21, 2000 2001 - 2006 Capital Improvement Program Sources of Funds Amounts in 000's Street Fund Revenue Bonds- 14% Drainage 4% Councilmanic Bond Proceeds 20% Utility Funds 16% Capital Improvement Fund Public Safety Bonds 11% 21% Grants Alternative Funding 7% Sources- Parks 5% Other Funding Sources 2% Recommend 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total Sources of Funds Capital Improvement Fund 3,111 2.735 2,672 2.885 2.794 2,770 16,967 Grants 2,275 438 1,400 595 4,355 1,242 10,305 Other Funding Sources 553 950 98 735 30 2,366 Alternative Funding Sources-Parks 2.645 633 1,512 1,240 1,228 536 7,794 Public Safety Bonds - 30,000 - - 30,000 Councilmanic Bond Proceeds - 2,000 21,000 - 6,273 29,273 Street Fund 4,511 2,251 3,733 4,056 3,955 2,727 21,233 Revenue Bonds-Drainage 6,279 6,279 Utility Funds 5,658 3,931 3,854 3,623 3,712 3,435 24,213 Total Sources of Funds 18,753 42,938 13,269 39,678 16,779 17,013 148,430 1 cw combined CIP requests 01.x1s 11/21/00 2001 - 2006 Capital Improvement Program Projects Forecast Amounts in 000's Public Safety 29% i & Community rn. Services '} 16% Transportation r 4 : General Government 11% Utility Fund Projects 24% Recommend 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total Projects Transportation 4,511 2,151 3,633 7,406 8,645 3,002 29,348 Public Safety 490 4,550 26,550 8,550 550 3,523 44,213 Parks, Recreation &Community Services 6,886 3,431 4,357 3,145 2,947 2,828 23,594 General Government ' 1,508 3,175 1,175 4,475 1,225 4,525 16,083 Utility Fund Projects• 5,358 3,631 3,554 14,202 5,312 3,135 35,192 Total Projects 18,763 16,938 39,269 37,778 18,679 17,013 148,430 Includes reallocation(from General Gov't-Facilities)of cost of Maintenance Facility funded with councilmanic bonds repaid from Street,CIP and Utility Fund operating transfers 2 Capital Improvement Program for Years 2001 -2006 Recommend 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total Sources of Funds Capital Improvement Fund 1.716 1,445 1,445 1.495 1,495 1,495 9,091 CIP Fund-REET 2nd Qtr 1,445 1,290 1,227 1,390 1,299 1,275 7,926 Youth/Teen 250 100 65 - - 415 Grants-Parks 2,275 438 1,400 395 300 867 5,675 Donations and Contributions 140 100 3 243 Other Funding Sources 13 750 30 30 823 Alternative Funding Sources-Parks 2,645 633 1,512 1,240 1,228 536 7,794 Public Safety Bonds - 30,000 - - 30,000 Sewer Utility Fund 521 403 415 427 440 454 2.660 Drainage Utility Fund 3,962 1,886 1,184 1,562 1,625 1,070 11,289 Revenue Bonds-Drainage 6,279 6,279 Grants-Street - - - 200 4,055 375 4,630 LID&Mitigation Payments 100 - - - 735 - 835 Street Fund 4,511 2,251 3,733 4,056 3,955 2,727 21,233 Councilmanic Bond Proceeds - 2,000 21,000 - 6,273 29,273 Water Fund 1,175 1,642 2,255 1,634 1,647 1,911 10,264 Total Sources of Funds 18,753 42,933 13,269 39,678 16,779 17,013 148,430 Transportation Corridor Improvements 500 500 2,000 2,000 1,000 6,000 Arterials 1,361 - - 500 5,965 900 8,726 Intersection&Signal Improvements 1,150 275 250 250 250 650 2,825 r Improvements 1,500 1,376 1,383 4,656 1,430 1,452 • 11,797 i utal Transportation 4,511 2,151 3,633 7,406 8,645 3,002 29,348 Public Safety Fire&Life Safety Requests 395 475 475 475 475 A75 2,770 Police 95 75 75 8,075 75 75 8,470 Public Safety Facilities 4,000 26,000 2,973 32,973 Total Public Safety 490 4,550 26,550 8,550 550 3,523 44,213 Parks,Recreation &Community Services 6,886 3,431 4,357 3,145 2,947 2,828 23,594 General Government General Government Facilities 337 350 350 3.650 400 3,700 8,787 Other General Government 1,171 2,825 825 825 825 825 7,296 Total General Government 1,508 3,176 1,175 4,476 1,225 4,625 16,083 Utility Fund Projects Sanitary Sewer 421 303 315 1,952 340 354 3,685 Stormwater Drainage 3,862 1,786 1,084 7,466 3,425 970 18,593 Water Projects 1,075 1,542 2,155 4,784 1.547 1,811 12,914 Total Utility Fund Projects 5,358 3,631 3,554 14,202 6,312 3,135 35,192 Total All Projects 18,753 16,938 39,269 37,778 18,679 17,013 148,430 3 cw combined CIP requests 01 ids 11/21/00 Transportation Capital Improvement Program for Years 2001 -2006 Recommend 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total Sources of Funds Grants 200 4,055 375 4,630 LID&Mitigation Payments 100 735 835 Street Fund 4,411 2,151 3,633 3,956 3,855 2,627 20,633 Total Sources of Funds 4,511 2,161 3,633 4,156 8,646 3,002 26,098 Corridor Improvements 228th Corridor- West Corridor 500 500 2,000 2,000 1,000 6,000 Arterials Orillia Road Repair 100 - - - - - 100 212th Street Rehab 300 300 132nd Ave Improvements(240th-244th) - 250 250 Washington Avenue Widening 300 - 300 72nd Avenue(180th-188th) 111 - _ _ _ - 111 72nd Avenue(196th-200th) 250 - 500 - 750 84th Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation - 500 - 500 Pacific Hwy South HOV Lanes-Phase II 300 - 4,965 - 5,265 Military Road Improvements - - 150 150 116th Ave Imp(256th-KK(SR516)) - 500 500 Central Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation - - 500 500 Intersection&Signal Improvements _ James&Central Intersection Improve 200 - - - 200 208th&98th Intersection Improvements 100 - - - - 100 WVH&277th Intersection Improvement - 250 - - 250 Military&Reith Intersection Improvement-A 450 - - - - 450 94th Ave @ Canyon Or Traffic Signal 400 - 400 1-5 &277th Intersection Improvement - 275 275 Military Rd&277th Intersection Improve - - - 650 650 116th&248th Signal - - 250 - 250 120th&248th Street Improvement - - - 250 - - 250 Other Improvements _ Miscellaneous Asphalt Overlays 478 497 517 538 560 582 3,172 Slurry Seal Program 50 50 75 75 75 75 400 Sidewalk Rehabilitation and Installation 300 300 300 300 300 300 1,800 Street Lighting Wiring Upgrades 60 - - - - - 60 Traffic Signal Controller Cabinet Replacements 40 40 80 Neighborhood Traffic Control 75 75 75 75 75 75 450 Traffic Signal Energy Conservation 25 - - - - - 25 City Wide Guardrail&Safety Improvement 30 30 30 30 30 30 180 Bike Paths - 100 100 100 100 100 500 Commuter Shuttle Bus 45 45 45 45 45 45 270 Street Tree Maintenance Program 141 141 141 141 141 141 846 Street Striping Program 81 83 85 87 89 89 514 Pavement Rating Survey 15 15 15 15 15 15 90 Lincoln Avenue(Smith-James) 150 - - - - - 150 Freight Mobility Study 10 - - - - _ 10 Total Projects 4,511 2,151 3,633 4,156 8,645 3,002 26,098 4 ., mtiir>A I`O.erecf5 n1 is,1,2,roo Parks,Recreation and Community Services Capital Improvement Program for Years 2001 -2006 Recommend 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total Sources of Funds CIP-REET 2nd Otr 1,445 1,290 1,227 1,390 1,299 1,275 7,926 Capital Improvement Fund 118 120 120 120 120 120 718 Grants 2,275 438 1,400 395 300 867 5,675 Youth/Teen Fund 250 100 65 - - - 415 Donations/Contributions 140 100 3 - 243 Other Funding Sources 13 750 30 - - 30 823 Alternative Funding 2,645 633 1,512 1,240 1,228 536 7,794 Total Sources of Funds 6,886 3,431 4,357 3,145 2,947 2,828 23,594 Projects Risk Reduction&Safety Improvements 243 262 233 213 213 1,164 Light Pole Replacement 20 150 150 150 150 45 665 Emergency Park Repairs 25 30 30 35 35 155 Tennis/Basketball Court Re-surfacing 40 20 35 20 15 15 145 Trails/Parking Improvements 25 30 30 30 35 150 Service Club Ballfields 1,400 800 2,200 Restroom Renovation 25 30 30 30 35 150 Lake meridian Park Improvements 100 210 - 310 Urban Forestry Plan Implementation 15 15 20 20 25 95 Grant Matching Funds 50 105 65 110 25 355 Architect/Engineering&Master Plans 10 25 30 30 35 35 165 Sign Replacement 10 10 10 10 15; 55 Downtown Sidewalk Replacement Enhancement 85 90 90 90 355 Golf Complex Projects 43 45 45 45 45 45 268 Soccer Field Renovation 800 300 1,100 Skate Park Development/Acquisition 400 r 400 Green River Disabled Fishing Access/Boeing Tr 300 300 Canterbury Park Development 238 238 Regional Trail System Planning 10 10 Lake Fenwick Park Development 75 75 Recreation Facility Feasibility Study 50 50 Botanical Garden 25 25 Mill Creek Trail Acquisition&Development 25 200 - - - 225 Big Blue Mobile Computer Lab - 65 - - - 65 Springwood Park Improvements 40 25 - - - 65 132nd Street Park Development - 750 - - - 750 Green River Corridor - 25 - - - 25 Demolition of Rental Houses - 25 - - - 25 East Hill Youth Sports Facility Development - 600 1,100 - - 1,700 Uplands Playfield Improvements - 40 - - 40 Seven Oaks Park Improvements - 35 - - 35 West Fenwick Renovations - - 307 - - 307 Kiwanis Tot Lot#1 Improvements - - 40 - - 40 Tudor Square Renovations - - 30 - - 30 Pine Tree Park Improvements - - 300 - - 300 West Hill Park Development(Seattle Water) - - - 777 777 5 cw combined CIP requests 01AS 11/21/00 Parks,Recreation and Community Services Capital Improvement Program for Years 2001 -2006 Recommend 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total Clark Lake Development - 300 30 - - 330 228th Corridor Park/Trail head(Russell Woods) - - - 25 25 Town Square Park - - - 1.000 - 1,000 Interurban Trail - - - - 30 30 Riverwalk/Riverview Park Development - - - 12 550 562 S.272nd St. Neighborhood Park Development - 400 - 260 660 Commons Playfield Renovations - - - 1,040 1,040 Turnkey Park Renovations 63 - 63 Valley Floor Athletic Complex Acq.&D. 770 770 Clark Lake Land Acquisition 3.095 - - - - 3,095 Grant Matching-Land Acquisition 75 100 100 100 100 100 575 BMX Property Donation 200 - - - 200 Panther Lake Neighborhood Park Acquisition - 350 - - 350 East Hill Youth Sports Complex - - 200 - - 200 Kent Memorial Park Acquisition - 1,000 - - - 1,000 Turnkey Park Acquisition&Parking Lot Development - - 250 325 575 314 to Pick-up 25 25 Earth Works/Mill Creek Park 14 14 Major Capital and Lifecycle Renovations 250 250 Outside Services 16 16 Total Projects 6,886 3,431 4,357 3,145 2,947 2,828 23,594 t 6 cw combined CIP requests 01.xls 11/21/00 General Government Facilities Capital Improvement Program for Years 2001 -2006 Recommend 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total Sources of Funds Councilmanic Bond Proceeds 13,000 6,273 19,273 Voted Public Safety Bonds 30,000 30,000 CIP Revenues Required 337 350 350 400 400 400 2,237 Total Sources of Funds 337 30,350 350 13,400 400 6,673 51,510 Projects Emergency Facility Repairs 100 100 100 100 100 100 600 Miscellaneous Furniture 82 25 25 25 25 25 207 Sealcoat Parking Lots 40 50 50 50 50 50 290 HVAC Repairs and Controls Installation 40 40 Roof Repairs 75 75 Other Facility Repairs&Improvements 175 175 225 225 225 1,025 Campus Expansion and Renovation 3,300 3,300 New East Hill Maintenance Facility 13,000 13,000 Subtotal General Gov't Facilities 337 350 350 13,400 400 3,700 18,537 Public Safety Facilities Projects Municipal Court Building 2,973 2,973 Police Headquarter Building 4,000 16,000 20,000 Other Public Safety Facility Improvements 10,000 10,000 Subtotal Public Safety Facilites - 4,000 26,000 - 2,973 32,973 Total Projects 337 4,350 26,350 13,400 400 6,673 51,510 1 7 cw combined CIP requests WAS 11/21/00 Other General Government Projects Capital Improvement Program for Years 2001-2006 Recommend 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total Sources of Funds Capital Improvement Fund 771 425 425 425 425 425 2,896 From Utility&Street Funds 400 400 400 400 400 400 2,400 Councilmanic Bonds 2,000 8,000 10,000 Total Sources of Funds 1,171 2,825 825 8,825 825 825 15,296 Other General Government Projects Water Automated Meter Reading/Rate Study 30 30 Agricultural Land Preservation 50 50 Miscellaneous Projects 100 125 125 125 125 125 725 Various Department Equipment 221 221 Printing Press 70 70 Police and Fire Automation 8,000 Automation Projects 700 2,700 700 700 700 700 6.200 Total Other General Government Projects 1,171 2,825 825 8,825 825 825 15,296 w t 8 �.v combined CIP eauests 01.x1s 11/21/00 Public Safety Capital Improvement Program for Years 2001 -2006 Recommend 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total Sources of Funds CIP Revenues Required 490 550 550 550 550 550 3,240 Total Sources of Funds 490 550 550 550 550 550 3,240 Fire&Life Safety - Fire Equipment Replacement Fund 300 400 400 400 400 400 2,300 Thermal Imaging Cameras 35 - - - - 35 Breathing Apparatus And Pass Alarm Replacemi 40 40 Hurst Tool Replacement 20 20 Other Fire&Life Safety Projects 75 75 75 75 75 375 Total Fire&Life Safety 395 475 475 475 475 475 2,770 Police CKCF Work Crew Van/Trailer/Equipment 50 50 CKCF Camera Upgrade/Renovations 12 12 LCD Projector for Classroom 20 20 Misc Police Projects 13 75 75 75 75 75 388 Total Police 95 75 75 75 75 75 470 'otal Public Safety Projects 490 550 550 w560 650 550 3,240 9 cw combined CIP requests Ot.xls 11/21/00 Water, Sewer and Stormwater Drainage Capital Improvement Program for Years 2001 -2006 Recommend 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total Sources of Funds Water Fund 702 1,542 2.155 1,534 1,547 1,811 9,291 Drainage Utility Fund 2,416 1.786 1,584 1,462 1,525 970 9,743 Revenue Bonds-Drainage 6,279 6,279 Sewer Utility Fund 57 303 315 327 340 354 1,696 Total Sources of Funds 3,175 3,631 4,064 9,602 3,412 3,135 27,009 Sanitary Sewer Remote Telemetry Upgrades-Phase 1 57 57 Engineering Remodel 73 73 Miscellaneous Sewer Lines 291 303 315 327 340 354 1,930 Total Sanitary Sewer 421 303 315 327 340 354 2,060 Stormwater Drainage Management Mill Creek Flood&Erosion Control Facility 320 320 256th Street Widening 910 910 Outfall Treatment 300 600 900 Soos Creek Basin Improvements 592 528 4,379 1,900 7,399 Miscellaneous Drainage Improvements 500 658 684 712 740 770 4,064 Military&Reith Intersection 100 100 94th Ave S&Canyon Dr Traffic Signal 250 250 WVH&277th Intersection 100 100 Military Rd&272nd Intersection 200, 200 Pacific Highway South HOV-Phase 1 500 500 Pacific Highway South HOV-Phase 11 785 785 72nd Avenue(196th-200th) 250 250 218th Street Bridge 300 300 1-5&277th Intersection Improvement 300 le 120th Ave&248th Street Improvement 250 250 Salmon Recovery 60 60 Engineering Remodel 73 73 Integrated Pest Management Plan 150 150 Remote Telemetry Upgrades-Phase 1 57 57 Total Stormwater Drainage 3,862 1,786 1,084 6,841 3,425 970 16,968 Water Projects East Hill Reservoir 1,050 1,300 2,350 Impoundment Project(1 24th-1 18th/288th-304th) 300 1.200 1,200 1,450 4,150 Miscellaneous Water Improvements 297 309 521 334 347 361 2,169 Wellhead Protection Plan 250 250 Remote Telemetry Upgrades-Phase 1 172 172 Study-Feed System Evaluation,GWI,Groundwat 100 100 Water Conservation 100 100 Pump Station#3(Replacement) 75 75 3-Year Lrg Mtr&Vault Replacement Program 33 33 34 100 Remote Site Security Vulnerability Study 50 50 Update of Kent's Water Comprehensive Plan 75 75 Engineering Remodel 73 73 Total Water 1,075 1,542 2,155 1,534 1,547 1,811 9,664 Total Utility Projects 6,358 3,631 3,554 7,702 6,312 3,136 28,692 10 cw combined CIP requests 01.xis 11/21/00 City of Kent Proposed Future Debt Issues 2001.2010 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Total General..vemment Debt Clark Lake Land Bands 3.0 3,000.000 3,000.000 Tech Plan 2 (510m/10yr) 10,000.000 2.000.000 8,000,000 East Hill Maint Facility-2554 13,000.000 3.250,000 Campus Expansion/Renavabon 3,300.000 3.300.000 Municipal Court-proposed 2,973 000 2.973,000 Subtotal Debt 5,000,000 11,250,000 6,273,000 22,523,000 Voted Public Safety 30.000.000 30.000,000 30,000,000 Debt Paid By Other Funds Service East Hill Maint Facility-75% 13.000,000 9.750,000 Socs Creek Basin Drainage Bonds 6,279.000 6.279.000 Subtotal Debt 16.029,000 16,029.000 Total Debt Principal 5,000,000 27,279,000 6,273,000 38,552,000 1' 11 FORECAST SPEC REV 01 xls':btl 1171f00 CITY OF KENT FUTURE BOND ISSUES October 31,2000 Bondlssue Purpose 2000(3) 2001 2002 2003 2004 COUNCILMANfC(LTGO) Gen Gov't Parking Garage 4,000,000 Gen Gov't Performing Arts Center Land' 2,500,000 Gen Gov't Fac Bldg Remodel&Generators 2,580,000 Public Safety Police Headquarters Land 1,000,000 Public Safety Two Engine/Aid Fire Apparatus 1,140,000 Gen Gov't Clark Lake Land Bonds 3.0 3,000.000 Gen Gov't East Hill Maint Facility-75%Paid By Other Funds 13,000,000 Gen Gov't Tech Plan 2 ($10m/10yr) 2,000,000 8,000,000 Sub-Total 11,220,000 0 5,000,000 0 21,000,000 VOTED Public Safety Public Safety Projects 30,000,000 Sub-Total 0 0 30,000.000 0 0 REVENUE Drainage Sods Creek Basin Drainage Bonds 6,279,000 Sub-Total 0 0 0 0 6,279,000 CONTRACT Valley Comm City Portion of Valley Comm Iss 2,551,600 Sub-Total 2.551,600 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 13,771,600 0 35,000,000 0 27,279,000 CITY OF KENT BOND CAPACITY October 31,2000 1.5%of Less Future Bonded Debt Percent of Net Direct Percent of Assessed Assessed Councilmanic Councilmanic Remaining Capacity Remaining Capacity Valuation(1) Valuation Debt Debt Capacity Used Capacity(2) Used 12/31/98 5,867,681,774 88,015,227 (43,173,969) 44,841,258 49.1% 57,806,258 34.3% 04/01/99 5,867,681,775 88,015.227 (42,792,172) 0 45,223,054 48.6% 58,188,054 33.9% 12/01/99 5,867,681,776 88,015,227 (61,960,630) 0 26,054.597 70.4% 39,019,597 55.7% 12/31/99 6,468,731,941 97,030,979 (60.337,630) 0 36,693,349 62.2% 49,073,349 49.4% 06/30/00 6,468,731,941 97,030,979 (60,'019,175) 0 37,011,804 61.9% 49,391,804 49.1% 12/31/00 7,134,929,227 107,023,938 (70,247,002) 0 36,776,936 65.6% 48,556,936 54.6% 12/31/01 7,384,651,750 110,769,776 (65.849.114) 0 44,920,663 59.4% 56,050,663 49.4% 12/31102 7,643,114.561 114,646,718 (61,427,213) (5,000,000) 48,219.505 57.9% 58,669,505 48.8% 12/31/03 7.910,623,571 118,659,354 (56.775,828) (4,753,936) 57,129,589 51.9% 66,859,589 43.7% 12/31/04 8,187,495,396 122,812,431 (52,014,463) (25,494,793) 45.303,175 63.1% 60.528,175 50.7% (1)The forecast beyond 2000 assumes assessed valuation increases at 2.0 percent per year due to estimated inflation plus 1.5%for new construction. (2)Total is reduced by Enterprise Fund Debt that is supported by Golf and Drainage Funds. (3)Bond issue for 2000 was completed in October 2000. Not included with Future Councilmanic Debt Included in Councilmanic Debt totals. 'Amounts do not include debt issuance or bond insurance costs. 12 Long Term Debt Payments General Obligation Debt Service 7,000,000 6,000,000 - 5,000,000 4,000,000 - 3,000,000 - 2,000,000 - 1,000,000 0 OO` OO'� OOc: Opt OOq O11 O,'y O,H O`1 O1q O�1 O,L"� Otis []Existing■Future t Existing Issues Original Outstanding Issued Maturity Amount 12/31/00 • GO Refunding 1985.86,87 1992, 2007 10.575,000 5,440,000 • GO Refunding 1978,89 1993 2004 2.765,000 1.130,000 • GO Parks/Street 1996 2016 5,595,000 4,885,000 GO Centennial 1996 2026 12,310,000 11.810,000 GO 1999 Bonds 1999 2019 21,205,000 12,035,000 GO 2000 Bonds 2000 2020 19,070,000 20,015,000 Future Issues Planned Estimated Issue Date Issue Amount Clark Lake Land Bonds 2002 3,000,000 Tech Plan 2($1 Om11 Oyr) 2002 2.000,000 Tech Plan 2($10m/10yr) 2004 8,000,000 East Hill Maint Facility 2004 13,000,000 Debt service payments include principal and interest and are net of contributions from the Street and Enterprise Funds. • Refunding projects were for Public Safety,Street and Parks projects. 13 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2000-2001 - 2005-2006 4& KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No, 415 Serving Unincorporated King County Kent, Covington, Auburn, Black Diamond, Renton, SeaTac, Washington APRIL 2000 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 12033 SE 256t"Street Kent, Washington 98031-6643 (253) 373-7000 SIX-YEAR CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2000-2001 - 2005-2006 April 2000 BOARD of DIRECTORS Bill Boyce Sandra Collins Scott Floyd Mike Jensen Linda Petersen ADMINISTRATION Barbara Grohe, Ph.D. Superintendent Daniel L. Moberly Assistant Superintendent of Business Services Fred H. High Executive Director of Finance Margaret A. Whitney Assistant Superintendent of Human Resources& Student Support Services Gwen Dupree Assistant Superintendent of Secondary Education Janet Rowe Interim Assistant Superintendent of Elementary Education & Instructional Services Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2DDO Kent School District No. 415 Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan 2000-2001 - 2005-2006 April 2000 For information on the Plan, please call the Finance & Planning Department at (253) 373-7295. Capital Facilities Plan Contributing Staff Gwenn Escher-Derdowski, Community Planning Administrator Joe Zimmer, Finance Department Clint Marsh, Director of Facilities Kathy Metzener& Karla Wilkerson, Facilities Department Kent School District Six-Year capital Facilities Plan April 20DO KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 SIX-YEAR CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN TABLE of CONTENTS Section Page Number I Executive Summary 2 I I Six-Year Enrollment Projection 4 III Current District "Standard of Service" 8 I V Inventory and Capacity of Existing Schools 12 V Six-Year Planning and Construction Plan 15 V I Relocatable Classrooms 18 V I I Projected Classroom Capacity 20 V I I I Finance Plan and Impact Fee Schedules 25 I X Appendixes 30 Kent School District Sbc-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2DOD Page 1 I Executive Summary This Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") has been prepared by the Kent School District (the "District") as the District's facilities planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act, King County Code K.C.C. 21A.43 and Cities of Kent, Covington, Auburn and Black Diamond. This annual plan update was prepared using data available in the spring of 2000 for the 1999-2000 school year. This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the Kent School District. This Plan is not intended to be the sole planning document for all of the District's needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic Long Range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board Policies, taking into account a longer or shorter time period, other factors and trends in the use of facilities, and other needs of the District as may be required. Any such plan will be consistent with this Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan. The Kent School District Capital Facilities Plan has been adopted by Metropolitan King County Council and Cities of Kent, Covington and Auburn and included in the Capital Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. An impact fee implementing ordinance for the unincorporated areas was effective September 15, 1993. This Plan update has also been submitted to Cities of Kent, Covington, Auburn, Black Diamond, SeaTac, and Renton. A financing plan is included in Section V I I I which demonstrates the District's ability to implement this Plan. This Capital Facilities Plan establishes the District's "standard of service" in order to ascertain the District's current and future capacity. While the State Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines do not account for the local program needs in the District. The Growth Management Act, King County and City codes and ordinances authorize the District to make adjustments to the standard of service based on specific needs of the District. Beginning in 1998, the District's standard provides for class size reduction for grades K - 3 from 26 to 22 students. The District's standard class size for grades 4 - 9 should not exceed 29 students, and class size for grades 10 - 12 should not exceed 31 students. (See section 11I for more specific information.) (Continued) Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April, 2000 Page 2 I Executive Summary (continued) The capacities of the schools in the District are calculated based on this standard of service and the existing inventory, which includes some relocatable classrooms. The District's 1999-2000 program capacity of permanent facilities is 24,761 which reflects program changes and the reduction of class size in grades K - 3. Relocatables provide additional transitional capacity until permanent facilities are completed. Kent School District is the fourth largest district in the state. The actual number of individual students per the October 1, 1999, head count was 26,346. Full Time Equivalent (FTE) enrollment for this same period was 25,059.70 (Kindergarten at .5 and excluding Early Childhood Education [ECE] and Running Start students). The District's standard of service, enrollment history and projections, and use of transitional facilities were among subjects studied by the Citizens' Concurrency Task Force. The Final Report of the Concurrency Task Force was approved by the Board of Directors on March 10, 1993. Findings and recommendations of the Concurrency Task Force are discussed further in Section I I I of this Plan. In subsequent years, the current plan is to maintain surplus capacity consistent with today's surplus. This surplus is achieved primarily through the transitional use of relocatables as recommended by the Citizens' Concurrency Task Force. The Concurrency Task Force reaffirms that, as has been the practice and philosophy of the Kent School District, and also based on the most recent recommendation of the Citizens' Facilities Planning Committee, portables are NOT acceptable as permanent facilities. Portables, or, using the more accurate but interchangeable term, "relocatables" may be used as interim or transitional facilities: 1. To prevent overbuilding or overcrowding of permanent school facilities. 2. To cover the gap between the time of demand for increased capacity and completion of permanent school facilities to meet that demand. 3. To meet unique program requirements. Use of relocatable and transitional capacity and specific recommendations by the Concurrency Task Force are further discussed in Section V I of this Plan. Pursuant to the requirements of the Growth Management Act, this Plan will be updated annually, with changes in the fee schedules adjusted accordingly. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April, 2000 Page 3 I I Six - Year Enrollment Projection For capital facilities planning, growth projections are based on student yield from documented residential construction projected over the next six years. (see Table 2) The student generation factor, as defined on the next page, is the basis for the growth projections from new developments. King County live births and the District's relational percentage average were used to determine the number of kindergartners entering the system. (see Table 1) Based on the 1999 percentage, 8.57% of King County live births, together with proportional growth from new construction, is equivalent to the number of students projected to enter kindergarten in the district for the next six-year period. (See Table 2) Early Childhood Education students (formerly identified as "Preschool Special Education [SE] or handicapped") are calculated and reported separately on a .5 FTE basis. The first grade population is traditionally 7 - 8% larger than the kindergarten population due to growth and transfers to the District from private kindergartens. Near term projections assume some growth from new developments to be offset by current local economic conditions. With a few notable exceptions, the expectation is that enrollment increases will occur District-wide in the long term. District projections are based on historical growth patterns combined with continuing development of projects in the pipeline dependent on market and growth conditions. The District will continue to track new development activity to determine impact to schools and monitor conditions to reflect adjustments in this assumption. The six-year enrollment projection anticipates significant enrollment growth from new development currently in some phase of planning or construction in the district. Information on new residential developments and the completion of these proposed developments in all jurisdictions may be considered in the District's future analysis of growth projections. Within practical limits, the District has kept abreast of proposed developments. The Kent School District serves six permitting jurisdictions: unincorporated King County, the cities of Covington, Kent and Auburn. The Lake Sawyer area has recently been annexed to the City of Black Diamond and the western portion of the district includes a small portion of the City of SeaTac. (continued) Kent School District six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April, 2000 Page 4 I I Six - Year Enrollment Projection (Continued) STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR "Student Factor" is defined by code as "the number derived by a school district to describe how many students of each grade span are expected to be generated by a dwelling unit" based on district records of average actual student generated rates for developments completed within the last five years. Following these guidelines, the student generation factor for Kent School District is as follows: Single Family Elementary .515 Junior High .197 Senior High .180 Total .892 Multi-Family Elementary .279 Junior High .086 Senior High .063 Total .428 The student generation factor is based on a survey of 3,149 single family dwelling units and 2,998 multi-family dwelling units with no adjustment for occupancy. Please refer to Appendix E on Page 33 for details of the Student Generation Factor survey. The actual number of students in those residential developments was determined using the District's Education Logistics (EDULOG) Transportation System. In 3,149 single family dwelling units there were 1,622 elementary students, 621 junior high students, and 566 senior high students for a total of 2,809 students. In 2,998 multi-family dwelling units, there were 836 elementary students, 257 junior high students, and 189 senior high students, for a total of 1,282 students. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April, 2000 Page 5 04 =1 -gr 0) CO , to (V) co le a) co 0 rl a CV) r- co W r— , N --t 00 , 0 U') 0 co a Nco CY) Cl)1 0) If) co 0) 0 N CD CD 0 0 co Ul) m r4 (N (N r4 (N N (N N CN r r CN(Dr a. co CO CD e 0) W 0) 0) r-- to N co 0) co f'- M r r co cn 00 v (D 0 0 Iq r co to r.- CN U') to co N co C) 0 " 0 a 0 0) to C) co co to CD� C4 C4 C4 ci Cq C4 ci U) CN co co 09 v Ln LO a co to in CO M r co M (D v a) v co 0) (D (D (N m co lir qq co C) 0 r 0 0 0 0) 0) CD 0) co to (D co co C6 r N ci N N N N1: 1-: r r r r CN L6 co v eq CN(D cv eq W) (D co v cv cv (n v LO 0 m I,. LO 0) a) (N tO .2 0) co co v OD (D f, 0) Cq co rC4 r ci r r r 1.7 1: 1: 1: 1 r Nm: W) In U') to U) , 0) m of CD mm co co r.- (D r 0to N r, , Ln (N C) N IV 0) CD , CO co C) CD 0) co Ctt 0� C� CR. Ct 401� CO CD 4m CO r— co v_ ui CN C6 C4 CNkn cQ to C4 Xl w U Go ,o 0) co CO00 coLn m 0) Ln 0) m Cl) CO) co m CF) C,) C.) C) 0 0 W mr co CD 0) cl) 0) r- CV CL w 0) NC) m m 0 m w m (3) 00 00 CD co CV) NNC%j co 76 .2 W) LO co CY) w N m r- m 0 M) O r 0 qw co m uj 0) 40 0 0) CD 0 M 0) 00 I-_ I-- co m Go rCD 0) 17 ci C4 co Z —J N Oj 04 CN M 0) Go o Ln CN P� CD co a co Ln m m C14 0 0 0 W CN a) co 0) co z w CV) w w im CD 0 m to to w co rl (D (D V 04 04 ui C> C4 c 0) CN Z cn '19 co r.- rl- Ln qr r- CD Ln (n IM M CM CM CO a Kr .Cr 0 W M CN N co 0 to Go Lr) c� U.) co CF) rl to CD w Ir C14 Ci C-4 U-) -0 *a 0) 7 rZ -7 -7 CV 7 C14 V y m u ui 0 m I o Go JQ (N m v m N0) W) co w 0) Of(D V a0) r— 0 cO N r.- N CD a C4 cm -e co to co Q C4 to co a. 0) 4* r� r CD co Ln w m C4 Z cm 0) W C co cli E c ui m c 0 0) 0) CO 0) 0) Nco 't a co (D m m 'ED 0 W co co to CO , M M coCD co co (N , (N v — co CD I` 1� f� (D LO LO LO V) Nt v m cm 0 co I ': �: Z 7 V-: CD 7 cq a.co CL 0 Lc C.) 00 cn &Z 0) (D V) co Go 0 w w Q v N v cq N C) co LO C) CO) (D I-- m 0) (N co (D (D LO co W -W m cn V* IV N m C� 0) M 0) co 1: TZ 1: 1: 7-� 1-: Iz V: 0) co 0 tn tm c (n(o V) a cm cn co a Ln Ln v r, m m co M CY co Ln a. co m m Nt (N C'� c) m cn v 0) m co It C6 IT ul Itt m cm m cn co 0 10 m Am co r m 0D Z 4) M Icy m m CO U) aa) IL > gn 0 Tco Q) 0) V- 1= CV a > M M .4t co0 r� co 0) 0 co cc E LM >. m cc 'D 'a 'D "0 'D 0 Mn T 2 2 2 T 2 0 C-4 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.415 SIX -YEAR FTE ENROLLMENT PROJECTION 1999 1 20921 2001 1 2002JI 2003 IL2004 2005 King County Live Births 21,972 21,817 21,573 21,646 22,212 22,780 23,350 1 Increase/Decrease -358 -155 -244 73 566 568 570 Kindergarten/Birth % 2 8.57% 8.52% 8.50% 8.50% 8.50% 8.50% 8.50% 2 Early childhood Education @.5 58 59 59 60 61 62 63 ' Kindergarten FTE @ .5 942 929 949 974 989 1,038 1,044 Grade 1 1,989 2,053 1,963 2,027 2,070 2,126 2,210 Grade 2 2,078 1,975 2,095 2,027 2,082 2,150 2,189 Grade 3 2,111 2,077 2,018 2,162 2,084 2,164 2,215 Grade 4 2,222 2,082 2,118 2,082 2,218 2,165 2,228 Grade 5 2,037 2,179 2,086 2,145 2,100 2,260 2,190 Grade 6 2,119 2,056 2,230 2,160 2,209 2,189 2,332 Grade 7 2,081 2,170 2,113 2,322 2,337 2,318 2,396 Grade 8 2,015 2,020 2,143 2,117 2,409 2,357 2,434 Grade 9 2,102 2,188 2,159 2,320 2,379 2,623 2,664 Grade 10 2,045 2,254 2,353 2,321 2,492 2,555 2,634 Grade 11 1,782 1,866 2,085 2,176 2,145 2,302 2,295 Grade 12 1,537 1,411 1,625 1,814 1,892 1,864 1,936 Total FTE Enrollment 25,118 25,319 25,996 26,707 27,467 28,173 28,830 r ,:3 Yearly Increase 176 201 677 711 760 706 657 Yearly Increase % 0.72% 0.80% 2.67% 2.74% 2.85% 2.57% 2.33% Cumulative Increase 288 489 1,166 1,877 2,637 3,343 4,000 [Full Time Equivalent(FTE) 25,118 1 25,319 25.996 26.707 1 27,467 1 28,173 1 28,830 1 Kindergarten projection based on King County actual live birth percentage and proportional growth from new construction. 2 Kindergarten FTE enrollment projection at.5 is calculated by using the District's percentage of King County live births 5 years earlier compared to actual kindergarten enrollment in the previous year.(ECE=Early Childhood Education) Oct.99 P223 Headcount is26.103. Oct.99 full student headcount including 116 Preschool&236 Running Start=26,346. ...] GROWTH P R 0 J E C T 1 0 N S Agustments for current economic factors ........... For facilities planning purposes,this six-year enrollment projection anticipates significant enrollment growth from new development currently in some phase of planning or construction in the district. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 2 April, 2000 Page 7 III Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" In order to determine the capacity of the District's facilities, the King County Code refers to a "standard of service" that each school district must establish in order to ascertain its overall capacity. The standard of service identifies the program year, the class size, the number of classrooms, students and programs of special need, and other factors determined by the District which would, in the District's judgment, best serve its student population. This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. Relocatables included in the capacity calculation use the same standard of service as the permanent facilities. (see Appendix A, B & C) The standard of service defined herein may continue to change in the future. Beginning in 1998, the District's standard class size for grades K - 3 was reduced from 26 to 22. Kent School District is continuing a long-term strategic planning`process which may affect aspects of the District's "standard of service'. Future changes to the standard of service will be reflected in future capital facilities plans. Current Standards of Service for Elementary Students Class size for grades K - 3 should not exceed 22 students. Class size for grades 4 - 6 should not exceed 29 students. Program capacity for regular education classrooms is calculated at an average of 25 students per classroom because there are four grade levels at K - 3 and fluctuations between primary and intermediate grade levels (i.e. Third / Fourth grade split classes, etc.). Students may be provided music instruction and physical education in a separate classroom or facility. Students may have scheduled time in a special computer lab. Special Education for students with disabilities may be provided in a self- contained classroom with a capacity of 10-15 depending on the program. (continued) Kent School District six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April, 2000 Page 8 I I I Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" (continued) Identified students will also be provided other educational opportunities in classrooms for programs designated as follows: English As a Second Language (ESL) Self-contained Special Education Programs Integrated Programs & Resource Rooms (for special remedial assistance) Education for Disadvantaged Students (Title I) Gifted Education Other Remediation Programs Learning Assisted Program (LAP) School Adjustment Programs for severely behavior-disordered students Hearing Impaired Mild, Moderate and Severe Developmental Disabilities Developmental Kindergarten Early Childhood Education (3-4 yr. old preschool handicapped students) Some of the above special programs require specialized classroom space, as well as music and physical education classrooms, computer labs, etc.; thus, the permanent capacity of some of the buildings housing these programs is reduced. Some students, for example, leave their regular classroom for a short period of time to receive instruction in these special programs and space must be allocated to serve these programs. Some newer buildings have been constructed to accommodate most of these programs; some older buildings have been modified, and in some circumstances, these modifications reduce the classroom capacity of the buildings. When programs change, program capacity fluctuates and is updated annually to reflect the change in program and capacity. Current Standards of Service for Secondary Students The standards of service outlined below reflect only those programs and educational opportunities provided to secondary students which directly affect the capacity of the school buildings. Class size for grades 7 - 9 should not exceed 29 students. Class size for grades 10 - 12 should not exceed 31 students. Special Education for students with disabilities may be provided in a self- contained classroom with a capacity of 10-15 depending on the program. (continued) Kent School District six-year Capital Facilities Plan April, 2DDO Page 9 III Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" (continued) Identified students will also be provided other education opportunities in classrooms for programs designated as follows: Computer Labs English As a Second Language (ESL) Integrated Programs & Resource Rooms (for special remedial assistance) Preschool and Daycare Honors (Gifted) and Advanced Placement Programs Basic Skills Programs Traffic Safety Education JROTC - Junior Reserve Officers Training Corps Variety of Technical & Applied Programs (Vocational Education) i.e. Home & Family Life (Cooking, Sewing, Child Development, etc.) Business Education (Keyboarding, Accounting, Business Law, Sales & Marketing, etc.) Woods, Metals, Welding, Electronics, Manufacturing Technology, Auto Shop, Commercial Foods, Commercial Art, Drafting & Drawing, Electronics, Careers, etc. Many of these programs and others require specialized classroom space which can reduce the permanent capacity of the school buildings. In addition, an alternative home school assistance, choice and transition program is provided for students in grades 2-12 at Kent Learning Center. Space or Classroom Utilization As a result of scheduling conflicts for student programs, the need for specialized rooms for certain programs, and the need for teachers to have a work space during their planning periods, it is not possible to achieve 100% utilization of regular teaching stations. Based on the analysis of actual utilization of classrooms, the District has concluded that the standard utilization rate is 95% for elementary schools and 85% for secondary schools. In future, the District will continue close analysis of actual utilization. Kent School District Citizens' Concurrence Task Force The Kent School District Board of Directors appointed a Citizens' Concurrency Task Force, made up of a cross section of the community, to assist in defining the District's Standard of Service. To accomplish this task, the Task Force was directed to study Kent School District enrollment history and projections, demographics and planned new developments, land availability for new schools, facility capacities and plans, frequency of boundary changes, and portable (relocatable) vs. permanent facility issues. A meeting for public input was conducted and the Final Report of the Citizens' Concurrency Task Force was approved by the Board of Directors on March 10, 1993. _ (continued) Kent School District six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April, 2000 Page 10 III Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" (continued) The Final Report of the Citizens' Concurrency Task Force included Findings and Recommendations and provision for the following long term goals: A. Seek to reduce classroom utilization rates to allow more flexibility on the building level. B. Seek to lower average class size from that established for the 1992-93 school year. C. Seek to minimize boundary changes. D. Ensure that new permanent facilities are designed to accommodate portables: 1) to resolve current quality concerns 2) to provide for sites for portables to meet increased demand. E. Pursue modernization of current permanent facilities to resolve current quality concerns and to provide for additional sites for portables to meet increased demand. F. Pursue modernization or replacement of current portables to resolve quality concerns. G. Ensure that new portables meet current concerns of quality. H. Ensure that all sites for portables be modernized and utilities be installed to meet quality concerns. I. The quality of facilities, when using relocatable facilities, is a major concern of citizens of the Kent School District. Use of relocatable and transitional capacity as well as more specific concerns and recommendations by the Task Force are further discussed in Section V I of this Plan. The Task Force also states that it has reviewed and accepted the explanation of methodology and the conclusions reached in the enrollment Forecasting System report and recommends that methodology not be changed without Board approval. Kent School District six-year Capital facilities Plan April, 2000 Page 11 I V Inventory and Capacity of Existing Schools Currently, the District has permanent program capacity to house 24,761 students based on the District's Standard of Service as set forth in Section I 11. Included in this Plan is an inventory of the District's schools by type, address and current capacity. (See Table 3 on Page 13) The program capacity is periodically updated for changes in programs. It also reflects the reduction in class size from 26 to 22 in grades K - 3 which was implemented in 1998. The class size reduction received voter approval in the Educational Programs and Operations Levy to continue through 2002. Since 1997, Kent Learning Center has served grades 2 through 12 with transition, choice and home school assistance programs. It is located in the former Grandview School in the western part of the District. This school was designed and is currently configured as an elementary school. Calculation of Elementary, Junior High and Senior High School capacities are set forth in Appendices A, B and C on pages 30 and 31. A map of existing schools is included on Page 14. Kent School NeWd Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April, 2000. Pepe 12 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.415 INVENTORY and CAPACITY of EXISTING SCHOOLS :Capa 000YearOL opened ABR ADDRESSm t , Carriage Crest Elementary 19W CC 18235-140th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 485 Cedar Valley Elementary 1971 CV 26500 Timberlane Way SE, Covington 98042 461 Covington Elementary 1961 CO 17070 SE Wax Road, Covington 98042 542 Crestwood Elementary 1980 CW 25225-180th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 428 Daniel Elementary 1992 DE 11310 SE 248th Street, Kent 98031 456 East Hill Elementary 1953 EH 9825 S 240th Street, Kent 98031 413 Emerald Park 1999 EP 11800 SE 216th Street, Kent 98031 475 Fairwood Elementary 1969 FW 16600.148th Avenue SE, Renton 98M 428 Glenridge Elementary 1996 GR 19405-120th Avenue SE,Renton 98058 461 Gross take Elementary 1971 GL 28700-191st Place SE. Kent 98042 447 Horizon Elementary 1990 HE 27641-144th Avenue SE, Kent 98042 418 Jenkins Creek Elementary 1987 JC 26915.186th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 423 Kent Elementary 1999 KE 24700.64th Avenue South, Kent 98032 466 Lake Youngs Elementary 1965 LY 19660-142nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042 594 Martin Sortun Elementary 1987 MS 12711 SE 248th Street, Kent 98031 475 Meadow Ridge Elementary 1994 MR 27710-108th Avenue SE,Kent 98031 447 Meridian Elementary 1939 ME 25621-140th Avenue SE, Kent 98042 556 Neely-O'Brian Elementary 1990 NO 6300 South 236th Street, Kent 98032 437 Panther Lake Elementary 1938 PL 20831-108th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 380 Park Orchard Elementary 1963 PO 11010 SE 232nd Street, Kent 98031 494 Pine Tree Elementary 1967 PT 27825.118th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 523 Ridgewood Elementary 1987 RW 18030-162nd Place SE, Renton 98058 523 Sawyer Woods Elementary 1994 SW 31135 228th Avenue SE,Kent 98042 499 Scenic Hill Elementary 1960 SH 26025 Wobdland Way South, Kent 96031 437 Soos Creek Elementary 1971 SC 12651 SE 218th Place, Kent 9W31 456 Springbrook Elementary 1969 SB 20035-100th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 423 Sunrise Elementary 1992 SR 22300.132nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042 532 Elementary TOTAL 12.679 Cedar Heights Junior High 1993 CH 19640 SE 272 Street,Covington 98042 971 Kent Junior High 1952 KJ 620 North Central Avenue, Kent 98W2 810 Mattson Junior High 1981 MA 16400 SE 251st Street, Covington 98042 815 Meeker Junior High 1970 MK 12600 SE 192nd Street, Renton 98058 897 Meridian Junior High 1958 MJ 23480-120th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 753 Northwood Junior High 1996 NW 17007 SE 184th Street, Renton 98058 959 Sequoia Junior High 1966 SJ 11000 SE 264th Street, Kent 9W31 812 Junior High TOTAL 6.017 Kent-Meridian Senior High 1951 KM 10020 SE 256th Street, Kent 9=1 1,391 Kentlake Senior High School 1997 KL 21401 SE 300th Street,Kent 96042 1.635 Kentridge Senior High 1968 KR 12430 SE 208th Street, Kent 98031 1.311 Kentwood Senior High 1981 KW 258W-164th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 1.312 Senior High TOTAL 5,649 Kent Looming Center(Grandview)2 1965 LC 22420 Military Road, Des Moines 98198 416 DISTRICT TOTAL 24,761 Changes to capacity reflect program changes and continued reduction in K-3 class size from 26 to 22. 1 Kent Learning Center serves grades 2-12. The building was formerly known as Grandview Elementary. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 3 April,2000 Page 13 LO Z7 6 0 0 c 0 |i d o Cm_ E @ 2 E , c c F- a) 2, Y 2 � @ ƒ O § 2# @ Q @ o § , @ 0 0 %- U m d » ! ) o 0) � : ° o � 2 C _ L ' �0 / 2 �_ k � . U ;f °® ƒ / 2 - . A i � . e ! i", 1>1 ]� H ■ # ! C� 4017. Cm U. ` 'S ___a § UM Be fill I Z. $' | !, ®a !# � � } , e. ! °� 1 / 0 $ £ � � � c 3S'eft_. elf |! 2 ® O u Coy e it ® -__. 2 X / E k !i $! ■ § . k Cc \ D E| C4 - ! _mom ■ �� . © � £ ■ z� AD�A.__ ■ ,. ! 2 0� Kent Schooloabld Six-Yew CaPMFadMes Plan Pap 14 V The District's Six-Year Planning and Construction Plan At the time of preparation of this Plan in spring of 2000, the following projects are recently completed or under construction in the District: • Kent Elementary#27a is located at 24700 - 64`h Avenue S. near downtown Kent. The school opened in January 1999 and students, staff and programs moved from the old Kent Elementary to the new Kent Elementary at that time. The new school retained the original name "Kent Elementary" and boundary changes and new programs were implemented in the Fall of 1999. • Emerald Park Elementary#29 is at 11800 SE 216th Street. The school opened in the fall of 1999. • Millennium Elementary #30 is under construction and scheduled to open in the fall of 2000. It is in the city of Kent at 11919 SE 2701h Street. • Construction funding for Elementary#31 and 32 will be presented for voter approval at a later date. The sites have not been determined. • Junior.High#8 is planned to fill future needs for grades 7 through 9. The Board authorized purchase of a site for this school at SE 286th Street on the east side of 1241h Avenue SE. Timing of the opening of the school is under review and dependent on enrollment needs and voter approval. Other future facilities are listed in Table 4 and shown on the site map on page 17. Each of the elementary schools has capacity planned for approximately 540 students each, depending on placement of special programs. Junior high schools are planned for a program capacity of approximately 1,065 students and Kentlake Senior High (#4) has a current program capacity of 1,635. County and city planners, decision-makers and school districts are encouraged to consider safe walking conditions for all students when reviewing applications and design plans for new developments. This should include sidewalks for pedestrian safety, pull-outs and turn arounds for school buses. Included in this Plan is an inventory of projects by type, size, location or region, and estimated completion date. Also included in the inventory are sites identified by the District, which are potentially acceptable site alternatives in the future. (see Table a) The voter approved 1990 Bond Issue for $105.4 million included funding for the purchase of eleven sites for some of these and future schools, and the sites acquired to date are included in this Plan. Funding is secured for purchase of additional sites. Not all undeveloped properties meet school construction requirements and some property may be traded or sold to meet future facility needs. Based on voter approval of $130 million in construction funding in February 1994, Millennium Elementary #30 is the last one to be constructed which has received voter approval. A $97.5 million bond proposal for the construction of Junior High #8, Elementary #31 and significant improvements to existing schools is pending voter approval at the time of preparation of this Plan in the spring of 2000. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April, 2000, Page 15 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 Projects Planned, Under Construction, or Providing Additional Capacity Site Acquisitions included { Protected Protected J%for SCHOOL / FACILITY / SITE LOCATION T e Status Completion ProgramDate Capacity Approximate Approximate ELEMENTARY (Numbers assigned to future schools may not correlate with number of exis#ng schools.) Millennium Elementary(#30) (Funded) 11919 SE 270th St,Kent 98031 New Construction 2" 485 50% Elementary#31 (Unfunded)7 To be determined ' New Planning 2004 540 75% Elementary#32 (Unfunded)2 To be determined ' New Planning 2005 540 75% JUNIOR HIGH Junior High#8 (Unfunded)2 SE 286th St 8 124 Av SE,Kent New Planning 2003 1,065 75% SENIOR HIGH Kentlake Senior High opened in 1997 and continues to provide capacity. Additional TEMPORARY FACILITIES Capacity Relocatables For placement as needed New Planning 2000+ 25•3t each 100% SUPPORT FACILITIES Satellite Bus Facility (Unfunded)2 To be determined ' New Planning ? N/A Land Use OTHER SITES ACQUIRED Type Jurisdiction Covington area (Near Mattson JH) SE 251 &164 SE, Covington 98042 Elementary City of Covington Covington area (Scarsella) SE 290&156 SE, Kent 98042 Elementary King County Ham Lake area (Pollard) 16820 SE 240, Kent 98042 Elementary King County Horseshoe/Keevies Lake area(West) SE 332&204 SE, Kent 98042 Junior High King County Shady Lake area (Sowers,etc.) 17426 SE 192 Street, Renton 98058 Elementary King County So.IGng Co.Activity Center(Nike site) SE 167&170 SE, Renton 98M School or King County Support Facility Notes: ' Some sites are acquired but placement has not been determined. 2 Unfunded facility needs are pending voter approval KeM School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 4 April,20M Page 16 \ �'lj� ?^ 411 • 1: � ' �1KOtti.... a Xor .� •' ,' ;<��w•,�j �•'• •lei�\i+T ••••' '.Y ,s `�.-. a :r»Ai �< : i•.w.+J L+ • •' • 3> de • k ;n,[. ... ,,,,, • •t<j' r .. -pie ,, • f,,,, Ail :F+.i.d• .�<RJv .:,''� :, ^:•'?'t r'NaTfR5 ED EP V- �.. �a.MO �? V�Y ■■+� j:.� rft'Y : •� I E ;.ilk�= � is !• y. , �••''�:. � '°.,:w�9:L-.>� `, i •.\ •''\ _, _ � j Tr.Mn1Y. le:.f f —Y . /-� 1•;.: 31 ilk 0. ` w X:. 't h .• b ; , • ��,!'• a �i... ;; L.."a KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 ' _' Sites Acquired or Under Construction S = Senior High site ;f •• �'•.,, • J = Junior High site •- E = Elementary site J +.+... • r f "' X = Support Facility she K+M�� ..- Map solace: King Courtly PWlnlnp 8 CaTwnuMy Devebprtlelli DNicbn �. Slle k5wW cation by Kart Selwal Obtrict f.. Kent Sdwd District Sbr-Yaw Caput FwMUn Plan page 17 V I Relocatable Classrooms Currently, the District utilizes 155 total relocatables. Of this total, 85 are utilized to house students in excess of permanent capacity, 65 are used for program purposes at school locations, and five for other purposes.(See Appendices A e C D) Based on enrollment projections and funded permanent facilities, the District anticipates the need to purchase some relocatables during the next six-year period. In the Final Report approved by the Board of Directors on March 10, 1993, the Kent School District Citizens' Concurrency Task Force reaffirmed that, as has been the practice and philosophy of the Kent School District, portables (or "relocatables") are NOT acceptable as permanent facilities. In addition to the Findings and Recommendations regarding portables listed in Section I 1 I, "Standard of Service," the Task Force also listed some specific concerns in regard to use of portables as interim or transitional capacity: I. The quality of facilities, when using relocatable facilities, is a major concern of citizens of the Kent School District. That the Kent School District should consider the following factors and priorities when using, purchasing and modernizing portables: A. HIGHEST CONCERNS 1. Adequate heat 2. Portable covered walkways, where practical 3. Adequate ventilation 4. Fire Safety B. MODERATE CONCERNS 1. Adequate air conditioning 2. Security 3. Intercoms / Communication 4. Restroom facilities 5. Storage facilities 6. Crowding / class size 7. Noise 8. Availability of equipment (i.e. projectors, etc.) 9. Lack of water (use bottled water/portable tanks for drain) (Continued) Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April, 2000 Page 18 V I Relocatable Classrooms (Continued) For the purpose of clarification, the term "portables" and the more descriptively accurate term, "relocatables" are used interchangeably in this Plan as well as in the Concurrency Task Force Report. The reports also reference use of portables or relocatables as interim or transitional capacity/facilities. During the time period covered .by this Plan, the District does not anticipate that all of the District's relocatables will be replaced by permanent facilities. During the useful life of some of the relocatables, the school-age population may decline in some communities and increase in others, and these relocatables provide the flexibility to accommodate the immediate needs of the community. Although the Citizens' Concurrency Task Force has reaffirmed that portables are not acceptable as PERMANENT facilities, they did recommend that portables, or relocatables, may be used as interim or transitional facilities: 1. To prevent overbuilding or overcrowding of permanent school facilities. 2. To cover the gap between the time of demand for increased capacity and completion of permanent school facilities to meet that demand. 3. To meet unique program requirements. Portables, or relocatables, currently in use will be evaluated resulting in some being improved and some replaced. Quality concerns will be among those addressed by the next Citizens' Facilities Planning Committee in review of capital facilities needs for the next bond issue. The Plan projects that the District will use relocatables to accommodate interim housing needs for the next six years and beyond. The use of relocatables, their impacts on permanent facilities, life cycle and operational costs, and the interrelationship between relocatables, emerging technologies and educational restructuring will continue to be be examined. Kent School District Sbc-Year Capital Facilities Plan April, 2000 Page 19 V I I Projected Six-Year Classroom Capacities As stated in Section I V, the program capacity study is periodically updated for changes in special programs and reflects class size reduction in Grades K - 3. As shown in the Inventory and Capacity chart in Table 3 on Page 13, the program capacity is also reflected in the capacity and enrollment comparison charts. (See Tables 5 8 5 A-&Con pages 21-24) The first school day of October is set by OSPI as the enrollment count date for the year. Full Time Equivalent (FTE) student enrollment for October 1, 1999 was 25,059.70 with kindergarten students counted at .5 and excluding Early Childhood Education students (ECE - preschool special education) and College-only Running Start FTE's. (See Tables 5 B 5 A-&C on pages 21-24) A headcount of all students enrolled on October 1, 1999 totals 26,346 which continues to rank Kent School District as the fourth largest district in the state of Washington. Based on the enrollment forecasts, current inventory and capacity, current standard of service, relocatable capacity, and future planned classroom space, the District anticipates having sufficient capacity to house students over the next Six years. (See Table 5 and Tables 5 A-B-C on Pages 21-24) This does not mean that some schools will not experience overcrowding. There will be significant need for new schools to accommodate growth within the District. Some schools, by design, may be opened with relocatables on site. Boundary changes, limited movement of relocatables, zoning changes, market conditions, and educational restructuring will all play a major role in addressing overcrowding and underutilization of facilities in different parts of the District. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April, 2000 Page 20 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY TOTAL DISTRICT SCHOOL YEAR 1999-2000 2000-2001 1 2001-2002 2002-2003 1 2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-2006 Actual P R 0 1 E C T E D iPermanent Program Capacity'] 23,820 24,761 25,246 25,246 25,246 26,311 26,851 New Permanent Construction 1 -1 Kent Elementary#27a 466 Kent Elementary replacement Emerald Park Elementary#29 475 Millennium Elementary#30 485 Junior High #8 (Unfunded)4 1,065 Elementary#31 (Unfunded)4 540 Elementary#32 (Unfunded)4 540 Permanent Program Capacity Subtotal 24,761 25,246 25,246 25,246 26,311 26,851 27,391 Interim Relocatable Capacity Elementary Relocatable Capacity Required 475 0 0 75 250 50 0 Junior High Relocatable Capacity Required 203 377 406 754 58 232 435 Senior High Relocatable Capacity Required 0 0 434 682 899 1,085 1,240 ITotal Relocatable Capacity Required 3 678 377 840 1,511 1,207 1,367 1,675 TOTAL CAPACITY 1 25,439 25,623 26,086 26,757 27,518 28,218 29,066 21 I TOTAL FTE ENROLLMENT/PROJECTION 25,118 25,319 25,996 26,707 27,467 28,173 28,830 DISTRICT AVAILABLE CAPACITY 321 304 90 50 51 45 2:36�:] 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for program capacity and updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 FTE=Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment (ie. ECE Preschool Handicapped& 1/2 day Kindergarten student=.5). 3 1999-2000 total classroom relocatable capacity is 1,821. 4 Unfunded facility needs are pending voter approval. Kant Schtiol District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 April,20DO Page 21 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL YEAR 1999-2000 2000.2001 2001-2002 2002-2003 2003-2004 2004-2005 1 2005-2006 Actual P R O J E C T E D Elementary Permanent Program Capacity 11,738 13,095 13,580 13,580 13,580 13,580 14,120 Kent Looming Center-Special Program' 416 New Permanent Elementary Construction Kent Elementary#27a 466 Replacement for old Kent Elamenlary Emerald Park Elementary#29 475 Millennium Elementary#30 485 Elementary#31 (Unfunded)4 540 Elementary#32 (Unfunded)' 540 Subtotal 13,095 13,580 13,580 13,580 13,580 14,120 14,660 Relocatable Capacity Required z 475 0 0 75 250 50 0 TOTAL CAPACITY 2 13,570 13,580 13,580 13,655 13,830 14,170 14,660 FTE ENROLLMENT/PROJECTION 3 13,556 13,410 13,518 13,637 13,813 14,154 14,471 SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 14 170 62 18 17 16 189 ' Kent Learning Center is a special program at Grandview School serving students in Grades 2 through 12. ' The school was designed and is currently configured as an elementary school. 2 Capacity is based on standard of service for program capacity and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. 3 FTE = Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment or Projection (ECE & Kindergarten = .5) Unfunded facility needs are pending voter approval. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 A April 2M Page 22 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL YEAR 1999-2000 2000-2Wl 1 2001-2W2 2002-=1 1 2W3-2W41 2004-2005 1 2005-20W Actual P R 0 J E C T E D 1.junior High Permanent Program Capacity 6,017 6,017 6,017 6,017 6,017 7,082 7,082 New Permanent Junior High Cons1ructi Junior High#8 (Unfunded)3 1,065 Subtotal 6,017 6,017 6,017 6,017 7,082 7,082 7,082 lRelocatable Capacity Required ' 203 377 406 754 58 232 435 TOTAL CAPACITY ' 6,220 6,394 6,423 6,771 7,140 7,314 7,517 FTE ENROLLMENT/PROJECTION 2 6,198 6,378 6,415 6,759 7,125 7,298 7,494 [SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 22 16 8 12 15 16 23 Capacity is based on standard of service for program capacity and updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 FTE = Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment/Projection Approximately 10 Junior High students are served part of the day at high schools for advanced placement. Unfunded facility needs are pending voter approval. April 2000 Page 23 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 B KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL YEAR 1999-2000 2000-2001 1 =1-2002 2002-2W3 1 zoos-2W4 2OD4-2005 1 200-5-2006 Actual P R 0 1 E C T E D Senior High Permanent Program Capacity 5,649 5,649 5,649 5,649 5,649 5,649 5,649 New Permanent Senior High Construction Subtotal 5,649 5,649 5,649 5,649 5,649 5,649 5,649 lRelocatable Capacity Required ' 434 682 899 1,085 1,240 TOTAL CAPACITY ' 5,649 5,649 6,083 6,331 6,548 6,734 6,889 FTE ENROLLMENT/PROJECTION 2 5,364 5,531 6,063 6,311 6,529 6,721 6,865 ISURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 285 118 20 20 19 13 24 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for program capacity and updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 FTE = Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment, excluding full time Running Start students. Approximately 10 Junior High students are served part of the day at high schools for advanced placement. Kent School DWM Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 C Apr#2000 Pop 24 V I I I Finance Plan The finance plan shown on Table 6 demonstrates how the Kent School District plans to finance improvements for the years 2000 - 2001 through 2005 - 2006. The financing components include secured and unsecured funding. The plan is based on voter approval of future bond issues, collection of impact fees under the State Growth Management Act and voluntary mitigation fees paid pursuant to State Environmental Policy Act. Kent Elementary.# 27a, replacement for the original Kent Elementary School, is the last school for which the District expects to receive state matching funds under the current state funding formula. For the Six-Year Finance Plan, costs of future schools are based on estimates from Kent School District Facilities Department. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April, 2000 Page 25 u yyyyyyN��I m U) N N W W M p N xx N N W►. ' In $ Q43ib a�i �2p5 C a N N W p N 8 Qq 8 pq Qp O O O O O QQ 5Q� qq QQLd O O c O Pj N C N m 004 ;> O IL Q U W U Cl N to �O Q N (V Z N p d ...� J U. O m o a CV) = W o o <: N «: d F (A p W 1 W O Y N N E c a O m g Q 3 v N171_ m co v ' L m t o c W E ' N c c C E N N W Q N L 4 Bi u GLD w E �' w g 5 vi I �' 1O M R o m`m YO f _ ¢ am E 72 M E� u> m 52y Ew _ ¢3 E w W n W E Z O �i a m In v1 cn a z '° G .Q 1 4) 0 _� G _ q1 W LL W W d t + M n n H U. m F F Y. W W Q • n n KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT FACTORS FOR ESTIMATED IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS r Student Generation Factors -Single Family Student Generation Factors -Multi-Family Elementary 0.515 Elementary 0.279 Junior High 0.197 Junior High 0.086 Senior High 0.180 Senior High 0.063 Total 0.892 Total 0.428 Projected Student Capacity per Facility SPI Square Footage per Student Elementary 540 Elementary 80 Junior High 1,065 Junior High 113.33 Senior High 1,650 Senior High 120 Required Site Acreage per Facility Average Site Cost/Acre Elementary (required) 11 Elementary $0 Junior High (required) 21 Junior High $0 Senior High (required) 27 Senior High $0 New Facility Construction Cost/Average Temporary Facility Capacity & Cost Elementary $9,011,914 Elementary @ 25 $78,504 Junior High $21,696,026 Junior High 29 $78,504 Senior High $0 Senior High 31 $78,504 See average calculations on Pg.27a Temporary Facility Square Footage State Match Credit Elementary 86,212 Current State Match Percentage 0.00% Junior High 25,256 Previous State Match 55.64% Senior High 21,736 Total • 4% 133,204 Boeckh Index Factor Current Boeckh Index $101.27 Permanent Facility Square Footage Elementary 1,410,811 Junior High 743,063 District Average Assessed Value Senior High 849,464 Single Family Residence $176,547 Total 96% 3,003,338 Total Facilities Square Footage District Average Assessed Value Elementary 1,497,023 Multi-Family Residence $56,029 Junior High 768,319 Senior High 871,200 Total 3,136,542 District Debt Service Tax Rate Current /$1000 Rate $2.32 Developer Provided Sites/Facilities Value 0 General Obligation Bond Interest Rate Dwelling Units 0 Current Bond Buyer Index 5.94% Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2000 Page 27 For impact fee calculations, construction costs are based on the average costs of the last five elementary schools and the next elementary school, and the average costs of the last two junior high schools and the next junior high school. Elementary Schools Cost Average Sawyer Woods $6,463,054 Meadow Ride $6,996,325 Glenrid a $8,032,895 Kent Elements #27a $10,122,095 Emerald Park #29 $10,957,114 Millennium Elementary #30 $11,500,000 Average Cost of 6 elementary schools $9,011,914 Junior High Schools Cost Average Cedar Heights $14,488,028 Northwood $17,100,049 Junior High #8 $33,500,000 Average Cost of 3 junior high schools $21,696,026 The impact fee calculations on pages 28 and 29 include a "District Adjustment" which is equal to the amount of increase that the impact fee formulas drive out for this year. The reasons for this adjustment include: 1) the district's long-term commitment to keep impact fee increases as minimal as possible, 2) the courts have not made a final determination on the validity of the voter approval of tax increases section of Initiative 695, 3) proposed Initiative 722 would require fee roll-backs and 4) the district's desire to avoid roll-backs and potential refunds under either of the above situations. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April, 2000 Page 27a KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Site Acquisition Cost per Single Family Residence Formula: ((Acres x Cost per Acre)/Facility Capacity)x Student Generation Factor Required Site Acreage I Average Site Cost/Acre I Facility Capacity Student Factor A 1 (Elementary) 11 $0 540 0.515 $0.00 A 2 (Junior High) 21 $0 1.065 0.197 $0.00 A 3 (Senior High) 27 $0 1,650 0.180 $0.00 A—> $O.DD Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Single Family Residence Formula: ((Facility Cost/Facility Capacity)x Student Factor)x(PermanentrTotal Square Foolage.Ratio) Construction Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Rata B 1 (Elementary) $9,011,914 540 0.515 0.96 $8,250.91 82 (Junior High) $21,696,026 1,065 0.197 0.96 $3,852.73 B 3 (Senior High) $0 1,650 0.180 0.96 $0.00 0.892 B—> $12,103.63 Temporary Facility Cost per Single Family Residence Formula: ((Facility Cost/Facility Capacity)x Student Factor)x(Temporary/Total Square Footage Ratio) Facility Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Rats C 1 (Elementary) $78,SD4 25 0.515 0.04 $64.69 C 2 (Junior High) $78,504 29 0.197 0.04 $21.33 C 3 (Senior High) $78.504 31 0.180 0.04 $18.23 0.892 C—> $104.25 State Match Credit per Single Family Residence Formula: Boeckh Index x SPI Square Footage x District Match% x Student Factor Boeckh index SPI Footage District Match% Student Factor D 1 (Elementary) $101.27 80 0 0.515 $0.00 D 2 (Junior High) $101.27 113.33 0 0.197 $0.00 D 3 (Senior High) $101.27 120 0 0.180 $0.00 D—> $0.00 Tax Credit per Single Family Residence Average Residential Assessed Value $176,547 Current Debt Service Tax Rate $2.32 Bond Buyer Index Interest Rate 5.94% Discount Period (10 Years) 10 TC—> $3,021.66 Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility/Site Value Dwelling Units 0 0 FC—> 0 Fee Recap A = Site Acquisition per SF Residence $0.D0 B = Permanent Facility Cost per Residence $12,103.63 C = Temporary Facility Cost per Residence $104.25 Subtotal 512,207.89 D = State Match Credit per Residence $0.00 TC=Tax Credit per Residence $3,021.66 Subtotal $3.021.66 Total Unfunded Need $9,186.23 Developer Fee Obligation $4,593.11 FC=Facility Credit(if applicable) 0 District Adjustment (See Page 27a for explanation) ($810.65) Net Fee Obligation per Single Family Residence $3,782.46 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2000 Page 28 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENCE Site Acquisition Cost per Multifamily Residence Unit Formula: ((Acres x Cost per Acre)/Facility Capacity)x Student Generation Factor Required Site Acreage I Average Site Cost/Acre I Facility Capacity Studenl Factor A 1 (Elementary) 11 $0 540 0.279 $0.00 A 2 (Junior High) 21 $0 1,065 0.086 $0.00 A 3 (Senior High) 27 $0 1,650 0.063 $0.00 A—> $0:00 Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Multi-Family Residence Unit Formula: ((Facility Cost/Facility Capacity)x Student Factor)x(Permanent/Total Square Footage Ratio) Construction Cosa Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio B 1 (Elementary) $9,011,914 540 0.279 0.96 $4,469.91 B 2 (Junior High) $21,696,025 1,065 0.086 0.96 $1.681.90 B 3 (Senior High) $0 1,650 0.063 0.96 $0.00 0.428 B—> $6,151.81 Temporary Facility Cost per Multifamily Residence Unit Formula: ((Facility Cost/Facility Capacity)x Student Factor)x(Temporary/Total Square Footage Ratio) Facility Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio C 1 (Elementary) $78.504 25 0.279 0.04 $35.04 C 2 (Junior High) $78,504 29 0.086 0.04 $9.31 C 3 (Senior High) $78,504 31 0.063 0.04 $6.38 0.428 C—> $50.74 State Match Credit per Multifamily Residence Unit Formula: Boeckh Index x SPI Square Footage x District Match% x Student Factor Boeekh Index SPI Footage District Match% Student Factor D 1 (Elementary) $101.27 80 0 0.279 $0.00 D 2 (Junior High) $101.27 113.33 0 0.086 $0.00 D 3 (Senior High) $101.27 120 0 0.063 $0.00 D—' $0.00 Tax Credit per Multi-Family Residence Unit Average Residential Assessed Value $56,029 Current Debt Service Tax Rate $2.32 Bond Buyer Index Annual Interest Rate 5.94% Discount Period (10 Years) 10 TC—> $959.44 Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility/Site Value Dwelling Units 0 0 FC—> 0 Fee Recap A = Site Acquisition per Multi-Family Unit $0.00 B = Permanent Facility Cost per MF Unit $6,151.81 C = Temporary Facility Cost per MF Unit $50.74 Subtotal $6,202.55 D = State Match Credit per MF Unit $0.00 TC=Tax Credit per MF Unit $959.44 Subtotal $959.44 Total Unfunded Need $5,243.11 Developer Fee Obligation $2,621.55 FC=Facility Credit(if applicable) 0 District Adjustment (See Page 27a for explanation) ($292.06) Net Fee Obligation per Mufti-Family Residence Unit $2,329.49 Kent School District Sic-Year Capital Facilities Plan Apra 2000 Page 29 IX Appendixes Appendix A: Calculations of Capacities for Elementary Schools Appendix B: Calculations of Capacities for Junior High Schools Appendix C: Calculations of Capacities for Senior High Schools Appendix D: Use of Relocatables Appendix E: Student Generation Factor Survey Appendix F: Summary of Changes to 1999 Capital Facilities Plan Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan April,2000 19 , o q a W £> v E m N l'f In N e A N l7 n m m n m Q v q m N J a m o < v a u°4 m a m I�'n Q co vmi io v�i vni mQ a u�i a In v`4 Po 2 O LL w Q,. IL o n z E $ a W p m p p p p p p 0 p p p� p m m Id • O 8 m O g H O O N O O N A O N O O $ 171 O O O 1!1 co O (Np g E w uj F E 1 : of tp� N m 17 O) A � A mp m 17 � �p pA (+1 Vf N m mp Q I!1 LL :;{I Q Q in 1A a N O cq Ymf N co N INff YNI ID in R V 12 N a O O < co "' m y O W t + in y> N od O O O to O O O O O O O O O N O N q + V 3 1q `fi" A O J O W '- L 2 W A 0 a u LL R O O O m O O O O O O N N — — — — — I+� O N O O O N O N C V W JO + L E U j;: V q T C V a Z OLU J g a r E 0 m Q O A n/ S p pp m aa N Iq n N {{pp Q N c0 OW n Q N v CO v N N v v N 0 Q a U Q Q N Q Q Y Q Q Q Q Q Q Q in Q Q U1 l7 Y1 0 Q Q Q Iq Q pj d m 9 r ffi W O 2 q E O W p E $ n _ > L° U 3 n c a V yZ G . . N O ON O O O p O O p m y a I+1 Ip A C W r 1 a W ca o 3 Y Q M W U m E o a m 8 LU U 8 Q g m o . y o IX v a �Q a a v m Ti g w,� a I�+, q N V, rn U m N Z o a o m Ep _ y uc o I U' 8 co q C Iy0 uj E S H ry A N m m A N A W m n n Ol N fOV co N m N N N N m m A N O A m N q : 8 q a y < .. U U U V O LU w w 3 cc _ Y Z Z a a a y U) CO (a Cc s toLL r O L A N O 0 Y - v O Q O o Y Z f U] U m e _ a o coo coU E K w m J t 3 - ffi 8 E c a t q U J N:<'>: J E c E r a e N e •e 3 y E .... >p d 8 n w to W y H U U O W W ILL U (� 3 Z a a a C N i U Un /n N In Y _ N a 8 r 1 u m E 0 Y m — a m a F z m n W m 55�� o E ^ tO n E 25 ^ n u t�i N v v rm. N tMo- c 7 a m ^ 3 m o N ui " N z W8O�1 d N WO pW" O O w $ LU z LL < ^O 5. Q > W ii m W ii! m G W N OLU 0 0 U e ':i C U W E E ; �+ 8 7 LL N h N N O m O O N N _m U �.• : U C " E J E E a' U o o ct E U - tea ' g c U S c CL OtS z O $ E > fi R E W ��, � _ m m to Ly .t �'. ^ �: pT1 p�� .0 Ol lNi N 17 m U VS ml m t0 a0p A m/ m m '; Ol p n P LU Q G a U :: a U V N 2S CN7 E Qp mm �j E ' E> - c •� ItNLo y� $y g m W 3 A:- n 8 UJ O W to a U G to a U : w d m w O. 2 > Q ?> Q m Q U Z n " y U m ^ m m IL m N m v to N ::::: `! N o " t►. h a U <"` O al 0 Y U $$ w a m t Ln Nm t9i 8m v - a.:> m o^ d 2 v `� m ,ua O O O 33 A m Qc u N = U S N ui 6 " W fo ^ CO O .R.. ik w V m Q h N N N Q t R y5 V :. m Q Yl N C m N FtJ .d ~O N O N p� p {pppi $i 'c �i E vt m Q N : amo r n m tmm O! COn -�i m ` m 'm W to (m a l7 g a0 a o u N A v N Q N N W N ! N U r�i O t9i " N Q m V m m ' W W C U a a -� Y U7 ¢ J K 3 f� o J n LL a a U Y f N Y Y Y Y r0 Q c m Ix = 2 a U = S = t t U O H m u It m N 8 c = 2 = _ LaE O = = 2 E v r A w > 4 W 2 N 2 V N y N E Q y O m •c '> Y 4 'c o m a W y <;; m Y ao $ 3 H a 9 m m z a 'c 3 c a m U m c E o a 8 m A t 0 o S Noem m m m x z to m x ,. HU leZ N Y Y Y Y N y W m a b u N c 0 Y & 0 U LO 'S OR 0 Clt CN U') CL Ul) z OD L) Ln OD Go M z } k ir a C14 to } } } ® ® ~ C4 $ } } ) l (14 W) r- Lq z 6 (n LU Lf) C-4 co C-4 \ z cc 'r OD LLI uj 0 co IL zo 0 cr U) ui LLJ (N Ln 0 m 4D co m 0) z 04 cr Ln OD 16 0) 6 OD — C) CD co m cc m 0 CL 0 0 cc 0 Z m V 0 VM cr ;71 c 0 for 0 d {imjpp iipp y o �bp a O N O N N m N n N e np N p P00 U) 7 O 1'1 t'1 fn 0 0 0 0 O O O O 0 0 0 to O O C O O O O O O O O O O O O O O G O C O O O O C 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 N O `° n U ts {fpO p� 1� Qp1cc LL �. O 1�f N tN0 N INO N al �+f OI a� 8 as A A '1 N 0) �L ' O O P ° N Q n Ifs m coo a C ' N 1'7 N N N N N N C O �- C O O G G O O O C G G O C C C O C O O C O O O C O G O O O 0 G -O C 0 0 0 C G O D m cc m `y CD �/C1 tppl 1p�1 t� 11pp a 8 p p off V N In V N < 1A N qq O N N 1!1 V n 1'1 n O IO 10 A 1° V W qp N N epp� N m N ' N N (7 O 1� 1�1 O 1+f N (? N N N A r1 N C of O O O O G 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C W O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 (D y 7 y r�pp NN Qp� p �Np �p C d O Qi O O ea OI W ONl a�D- OI INO N IQ Ci A N O OI co Inp . 10�1 A tNO . N N N PI O�i V�1 F- o o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o H o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O N ^ m N OI ' N O A 10 40 ' m 0 �p O N ' n O/ O b O B O ' O7 , � I�f N N N A 0 m r 47 tn Ln N C et c c c y al d Uu 7 11J 7 Go w U E ` y 0 � opp �Q Q fp � 1p �p E LLI LL 0 z W J d N CO C Aa Em= N Em `l 0 U c m a` 1p w U w > a a U c m 3 w 3 aC O x c w c w c u Z (n of .� S c W U U U N (� W y N S m w f U w U x 2 � � � � � C LL � U' Z W YLU Y W w m m a N O O O m 111 N of _y = E C n C (A a) v E w E O N 70 m Z t o L O v 0 .O. w O > O a 1oLLA „ 0)� c a� ,� m E Z p `a a y v c ' 3 y a c m 0 _ O o c c E LL N m a' N 'C y c x m O � r0 06 , � � aa)) Er ° arna' 41 Erca' cm o a � _ m c � � .�� �`m �ir oorm �� = � mnE � Ea W ffi LL — a oat1 3 d crn —0 m _ � m aQ a '� aaQ � a� y & v ``�' 'D aia d c ° ro 00 ami o d LL 3 .� CL Q dr. Q o '° Q 1O Q c m d 0 L 0 0 -a ch c Nto 06 W 0 o� = 0 LL c c �i �U �i m � Q d Q ° c m °z `o o LL c U Y3 c 10 m d (7 od w 7 w c d' -0 m d a U c d :° Ur` a d o 5� — c -0 � �; c ° c � .0 vm ac E 0 �' U V v a(AW c � aa > ` O a� ° ° od .. hmTo O5. 0dEco m o 2. ctn d ° o W o m 'A 5 m a a) E A `o U w ° m 0 0 (° m U 0 5 y E m mE H oo c c' v ayi c c E L ai c c a`r •- a o ._ ._ C _ Y c d E > E _ _ (a r m m o = m m t m ,v_ d 3 ° = m ° o y d m o '� v a a, yr 2 m r ` N Q U U ULL LLLL2J Ja cr UyU � ►— F— � ; S mUULL2 � � J � fn <A u) ;L W W t u m c m Y Appendix F - Summary of Changes to April 1999 Capital Facilities Plan The Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") is updated annually based on previous Plans in effect since 1993. The primary changes from the April 1999 Plan are summarized here. Kent Elementary #27a opened in January, 1999 to replace the original Kent Elementary. The original Kent Elementary building is being leased out and its capacity is no longer included in the Plan. Emerald Park Elementary #29 opened in September, 1999. Millennium Elementary #30 is under construction and is scheduled to open in August, 2000. Changes to capacity continue to reflect reduction in class size for grades K - 3 as well as annual program changes. Changes in portables or transitional capacity reflect purchase, sale, surplus and/or movement of portables between facilities. Permanent facility costs have been adjusted to reflect averages of costs for schools built most recently. The district expects to receive no state matching funds for schools in this Plan and tax credit factors are updated annually. Unfunded facility needs are pending voter approval. Impact fee calculations include a "District Adjustment' which is equal to the amount of increase that the impact fee formulas drive out for this year. See page 27a for further explanation. Student enrollment forecast is updated annually. Changes to Impact Fee Calculation Factors include: ITEM omdarT>pe FROM TO Comments Student Generation Factor Ekm 0.512 0.515 Updated In 19N Plan Single Family (SF) Jr 0.188 0.197 Sr 0.140 0.180 Total 0.840 0.892 Student Generation Factor Elem 0.235 0.279 Updated in 1999 Plan Multi-Family(MF) Jr 0.080 0.086 Sr 0.062 0.063 TOW 0.377 0.428 State Match 55.64% 0% Updated In 19M Plan Boeckh Index(Cost per square foot) $0.83 $101.27 Per SPI Average Assessed Valuation SF $162.224 $176,547 Per Puget Sound ESD AV-Average of Condominiums&Apts. MF $47,652 $56,029 Per Puget Sound ESD Debt Service Tax Rate $Z97 $2-32 Per King County Assessor General Obligation Bond Interest Rate 5.11% 5.94% Market Rate Impact Fee-Single Family SF $3,782 $3,782 No charge to fee Impact Fee- Muni-Family MF $2,329 $2,329 No change to fee Kent School District Six-Year capital Facilities Plan APPENDIX F April 2000 Page 34 T e decal a W School D1Stric' RECEIVE No . 2l0 BUG CIT} Or KENT ^/o o PLANNING DEPARTMENT Capital Facilities Plan Bultaingfor the 21st- Centuly FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN BOARD OF EDUCATION Audrey Germanis Linda Hendrickson Holly Isaman Ann Murphy Jim Storvick SUPERINTENDENT Thomas R.Murphy FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999100 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS........................................ INTRODUCTION....................................... SECTION 1 THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Introduction............................................................. 1 Inventory of Educational Facilities............................. 2 Inventory of Non-Instructional Facilities.................... 3 Needs Forecast-Existing Facilities.......................... 4 Needs Forecast -New Facilities.............................. 5 Six Year Finance Plan.............................................. 6 SECTION 2 MAPS OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES Introduction............................................................. 7 Map-Elementary Boundaries.................... 8 Map - Junior High Boundaries.................... 9 Map - Senior High Boundaries................... 10 SECTION 3 SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION Introduction............................................................. 11 Building Capacities................................................... 12-13 Portable Locations................................................... 14-15 Student Forecast...................................................... 16-18 Capacity Summaries................................................. 19-23 King County Impact Fee Calculations....................... 24-26 SECTION 4 SUMMARY OF CHANGES FROM THE 1998/99 PLAN 27-29 ii FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN INTRODUCTION In response to the requirements of the State of Washington Growth Management Act (SHB 2929 (1990) and ESHB 1025 (1991)), and under the School Impact Fee Ordinances of King County Code 21A, City of Federal Way Ordinance No. 95-249 effective December 21, 1995 as amended, and the City of Kent Ordinance No. 3260 effective March 1996, Federal Way Public Schools has updated its 1998/99 Capital Facilities Plan as of May 2000. This Plan has been adopted by King County, the City of Kent and the City of Federal Way and is incorporated in the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction by reference. This plan is also included in the Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. To date, the City of Auburn and City of Des Moines have not adopted a school impact fee ordinance. The Growth Management Act requires the County to designate Urban Growth areas within which urban growth can be encouraged. The Growth Management Planning Council adopted and recommended to the King County Council four Urban Growth Area Line Maps with designations for urban centers. A designation was made within the Federal Way planning area, which encompasses Federal Way Public Schools boundaries. King County will encourage and actively support the development of Urban Centers to meet the region's need for housing, jobs, services, culture and recreation. This Plan's estimated population growth is prepared with this underlying assumption. This Capital Facilities Plan will be used as documentation for any jurisdiction, which requires its use to meet the needs of the Growth Management Act. This plan is not intended to be the sole planning tool for all of the District needs. The District may prepare interim plans consistent with Board policies. Additional plans will be consistent with the six year Capital Facilities Plan. iii FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN INTRODUCTION (continued) On October 12, 1998 the Board of Education approved a recommendation to move to a Pre K-5 elementary, 6-8 middle school, and 9-12 high school grade configuration beginning in the fall of 2002 or as additional high school space allows. This grade configuration is believed to be more responsive to student needs. It will allow for smaller elementary enrollments with room for lower primary class sizes. The middle school allows two-year preparation for the WA State 7"' grade test, matches the Federal Way Public Schools 8`h grade gateway test, and matches most western Washington districts. Middle schools are also thought to be a better way to address the needs of adolescence in a period of transition from elementary to school to high school. The four-year high school plan combines the 9-12 graduation credit system, allows two-year preparation from the 10`h grade test, and physically places the high school students together. Federal Way Public Schools must meet the needs of a growing student and community population. The District must be flexible with building,programs and staffing to meet the needs of the 21" Century, while being financially responsible and sensitive to the current tax rates. A flexible, cost effective and educationally beneficial approach that integrates academics and high tech/high skill preparation is needed. By extending the existing debt and creatively using new and existing facilities, the District can meet these complex needs with no increase in local tax rates. Federal Way citizens approved a bond proposal of$83 million on May 18, 1999. This bond will provide for a comprehensive high school ($44 million); a middle school ($17 million); expansion and improvement of existing schools ($9 million); replacement of Truman High School ($6 miIlion) and other general improvements ($7 million). Additional planned improvements included in the bond proposal are: parking and pedestrian safety, playgrounds and sports fields, new classroom start-up and music equipment, information systems and networks and emergency communications. Federal Way Public Schools opened the Internet Academy in the 1996/97 school year. This program currently serves approximately 710 students, 487 are full time students. Internet Academy has grown from about 60 students to the current 700 in three years. The forecast for growth in this program is to serve approximately 750 full time students by the year 2005. Internet Academy is currently operating out of leased space consisting of administrative areas and a computer lab area. Additionally, some lab sections are scheduled in the current high school facilities during non-school hours. There is an anticipated need of approximately 2000 square feet of additional space over the next two years. This capacity is not included in the analysis of instructional spaces. The facility needs are unique to a program of"distance learners". iv FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN The Marketing Academy School operated in Federal Way for two years from 1997 to 1999. As the District evaluated this program, it was determined that the program was not meeting the needs of students in the most effective manner. The Marketing Academy School has not operated this year and there are no plans to start the program in the near future. Federal Way Public Academy opened in the 1999/00 school year in six portables on the Illahee Junior High site. The school served 120 seventh and eigth grade students this year and will serve 180—210 students in grades seven, eight and nine in the 2000/2001 school year. One additional single wide and one double wide portable will be moved to the site during the summer of 2000. v SECTION 1 THE CAPTIAL FACILITIES PLAN FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 1 - THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN The State Growth Management Act requires that several pieces of information be gathered to determine the facilities available and needed to meet the needs of a growing community. This section provides information about current facilities, existing facility needs, and expected future facility requirements for Federal Way Public Schools. This is followed by a Financial Plan which shows expected funding for any new construction, portables and update modernization needs listed. 1 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN INVENTORY OF EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS Adelaide 1635 SW 304th Street Federal Way 98023 Brigadoon 3601 SW 336th Street Federal Way 98023 Camelot 4041 S 298th Street Auburn 98001 Enterprise 35101 5th Avenue SW Federal Way 98023 Green Gables 32607 47th Avenue SW Federal Way 98023 Lake Dolloff 4200 S 308th Street Auburn 98001 Lake Grove 303 SW 308th Street Federal Way 98023 Lakeland 35675 32nd Avenue S Auburn 98001 Mark Twain 2450 S Star Lake Road Federal Way 98003 Meredith Hill 5830 S 300th Street Auburn 98001 Mirror Lake 625 S 314th Street Federal Way 98003 Nautilus 1000 S 289th Street Federal Way 98003 Olympic View 2626 SW 327th Street Federal Way 98023 Panther Lake 34424 1st Avenue S Federal Way 98003 Rainier View 3015 S 368th Street, Federal Way 98003 Sherwood Forest 34600 12th Avenue SW Federal Way 98023 Silver Lake 1310 SW 325th Place Federal Way 98023 Star Lake 4014 S 270th Street Kent 98032 Sunnycrest 24629 42nd Avenue S Kent 98032 Twin Lakes 4400 SW 320th Street Federal Way 98023 Valhalla 27847 42nd Avenue S Auburn 98001 Wildwood 2405 S 300th Street Federal Way 98003 Woodmont 26454 16th Avenue S. Des Moines 98198 JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS Federal Way Public Academy 36001 Is'Ave S Federal Way 98003 Illahee 36001 1st Avenue S Federal Way 98003 Kilo 4400 S 308th Street Auburn 98001 Lakota 1415 SW 314th Street Federal Way 98023 Sacajawea 1101 S Dash Point Road Federal Way 98003 Saghalie 33914 19th Avenue SW Federal Way 98023 Totem 26630 40th Avenue S Kent 98032 SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS Decatur 2800 SW 320th Street Federal Way 98023 Federal Way 30611 16th Avenue S Federal Way 98003 Thomas Jefferson 4248 S 288th Street Auburn 98001 ALTERNATIVE SCHOOLS Merit School 31455 28th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Harry S Truman High School 31455 28th Ave S Federal Way 98003 LEASED SPACE Internet Academy 32020 1"Ave S Federal Way 98003 2 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999100 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CURRENT INVENTORY NON-INSTRUCTIONAL FACILITIES 1 Developed Property Administrative Building 31405 18th Avenue S Federal Way 98003 MOT Site 1066 S 320th Street Federal Way 98003 Central Kitchen. 1344 S 308th Street Federal Way 98003 Federal Way Memorial Field 1300 S 308th Street Federal Way 98003 Leased Space Community Resource Center 1928 S Sea Tac Mall Federal Way 98003 Security Offices 30819 14`h Ave S Federal Way 98003 Undeveloped Property Site# Location 91 27`h Avenue SW &Dash Point Road 23 SW 360th Street & 3rd Avenue SW 35 S 351st Street & 52nd Avenue S 40 E of loth Avenue SW Between SW 334th & SW 335th Streets 63 E of 47th Avenue SW & SW 314th Place 71 S 344th Street &46th Avenue S 72 36600 block of Pacific Highway S 84 3737 S 360th Street 85 16`h Ave S and S 3641h Way 96 S 308th Street & 14th Avenue S Notes: Not all undeveloped properties are large enough to meet school construction requirements. Properties may be traded or sold depending on what locations are needed to house students in the District. 1 There is a pending sale on this property. 1 3 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN NEEDS FORECAST-EXISTING FACILITIES EXISTING FACILITY FUTURE NEEDS ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF FUNDS Truman High School Modernization with expansion (1) Purchase and Relocate Interim Capacity (1) Portables Decatur High School, Federal Expansion (1) Way High School and Thomas Jefferson High School Various School Sites Parking Safety; Network (2) Upgrades; Automated Libraries; Elementary Playgrounds; High School Sports Fields; Emergency Communications. Notes: (1) Anticipated source of funds is state matching funds, Impact Fees, future bond issues and/or non-voted debt issues. (2) Anticipated source of funds is future bond issues. 4 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN NEEDS FORECAST - NEW FACILITIES NEW FACILITY LOCATION I ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF FUNDS New Senior High School Site 85(1) (2) New Middle School Unknown (2) Notes: (1) Site 85 is the designation for the new senior high school This site, purchased in 2000 is located at 161h Ave S and S 3641h Way (District maps will be updated to reflect location). (2)Anticipated source of funds is state matching funds,Impact Fees, future bond issues and/or non-voted debt issues. 5 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Six Year Finance Plan Secured Funding Sources 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Total Revenue Impact Fees(1) S250,000 $462,706 S250,000 S962,70 Land Sale Funds(2) S500,000 S750,000 S573,215 S500,000 S2,323,21 Bond Funds(3) S9,000,000 TOTAL S9,750,0001 S 1,212,7061 S823,215 S500,000 SO _S01 512,285,921 Unsecured Funding Sources State Match Funds(5) S7,000,00 Bond or Levy Funds(3) S74,000,00 Land Fund Sales(6) S800,00 Impact Fees(4) S 1,500,00 ,[TOTAL S83,300,000 NEW SCHOOLS 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 il$3.2400100 New Middle School S2,000,000 S3,000,00 $12,000.00 New Senior High School S1,700,000 S10,400,00 $17,900,00 $10,800,00 New Senior High School Site S3,200,000 MODERNIZATION AND EXPANSION Truman Senior High(Altemative) S500,000 S3,500,000 $2,000,000 S6,000,00 Expansion Three High Schools S700,000 S6,800,000 S7,500,00 Expansion Elementary Schools S100,000 S1,500,000 S1,600,00 TEMPORARY FACILITIES Portables(7) S362,245 S241,497 $603,74 OTHER Safety Improvements(8a) $1,400,000 $1,600,000 S3,000,00 School Improvements(8b) $1,800,000 $1,300,000 $300,000 S600,000 $4,000,00 Facilities Department S250,000 S250,000 S250,000 S250,000 S250,000 S250,000 S1,500,00 TOTAL 59,912,245 S23,850,000 S20,691,497 S13,750,000 S4,750,000 S12,250,000 S85,203,74 MOTES: I. These fees are currently being held in a King County,City of Federal Way and City of Kent impact fee account,and will be available for use by the District for system improvements. . 2. These funds come from various sales of land and are set aside for estimated expenditures. 3. These funds will be used for future projects. 4. These are projected fees based upon known residential developments in the District over the next six years. 5. These funds are projected state matching funds. 6. These funds are projected land sale income. 7. These fees represent the cost of moving and siting existing portables and purchasing new portables. The District may choose to purchase new portables in the years shown. This estimate may also include the cost of purchasing these portables. 8a.These projects have been approved by the Board of Directors and cover most schools. These projects do not increase capacity. These projects inlcude parking and pedestrian safety improvements at 15 elementary schools. 8b.These projects have been approved by the Board of Directors and cover most schools. These projects do not increase capacity. These projects include:school networks.information and library systems;new classroom start up;elementary playgrounds and high school sports fields; music equipment;emergency communication. 6 SECTION 2 MAPS OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 2 - MAPS OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES Federal Way Public Schools (the District) has twenty-three elementary schools (grades K-6), seven junior high schools (grades 7-9), three senior high schools (grades 10-12) and two alternative schools (grades 7-12) for the 1999/00 school year. On April 20, 1996 the Federal Way Public Schools Board of Education adopted the boundaries for these schools. The following maps show the service area boundaries for each school for each grade level (Harry S. Truman High School, Merit School, Internet Academy and Federal Way Public Academy serve students from throughout the District). The identified boundaries are reviewed annually. Any change in grade configuration or adoption of programs which affect school populations may necessitate a change in school service areas. The Growth Management Act requires that a jurisdiction evaluate if the public facility infrastructure is in place to handle new housing developments. In the case of most public facilities, new development has its major impact on the facilities immediately adjacent to that development. School Districts are different. If the District does not have permanent facilities available, interim measures must be taken until new facilities can be built or until boundaries can be adjusted to match the population changes to the surrounding facilities. Adjusting boundaries requires careful consideration by the District and is not taken lightly. It is recognized that there is a potential impact on students who are required to change schools. Boundary adjustments impact the whole district, not just one school. It is important to realize that a single housing development does not require the construction of a complete school facility. School districts are required to project growth throughout the district and build or adjust boundaries based on growth throughout the district, not just around a single development. 7 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL BOUNDARIES E F G ------H X -----------1 -- FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 210 1 ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS Code- code 10 Adelaide C-6 64 Illah" E-9 16 Brigadoon B Kilo G-6 2 1 2 66 28 Camelot G3 62 Lakota D-6 22 Enterprise D-9 61 Sacajawea E-5 114 Green Gables A-7 70 Saghalie C-a 30 Lake Dolloff G-6 65 Totem G-3 11 Lake Grove D-6 8 Merit F-6 33 Lakeland F-9 2 Mark Twain F-4 29 Meredith Hill H-5 SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS 3 3 6 Mirror Lake E-6 5 Nautilus E-5 Code 15 Olympic View C-7 21 Panther Lake E-8 80 Decatur C-6 37 Rainier View F-10 81 Federal Way ES 41 Sherwood Forest D-S 83 Thomas Jefferson G-4 24 Silver Lake D-7 8 Harry S.Truman F-6 26 Star Lake G-3 8 Merit F4 25 Sunnycrest G-2 13 Twin Lakes 8.6 27 Valhalla G-4 Future School Sites— 7 Wildwood F-5 Surplus Sites — 7 I Woodmont F-3 100 Educational Service Center F-6 _ 99 Future Support Services E-S — Code-- 97 Maintenaneg.Opemdo"-Tmnsportation E-6 it Parks— ji • • 5 FEDERAI. WAY, WASHINGTON and VIINIT i 4 6 6. 7 N B 18 ts -j- 22 9 9 FEDERALI WAY 10 e a 10 Nanning&FYiaue (253) 945-2000 IL C� F G it F H 8 Junior High School Boundaries G ----- -------- I"r-RAL WAY SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 210 ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS Code Code 10 Adelaide C-15 64 Illah" E-9 B4 66 Kilo G-6 2 16 Brigadoon 28 Camelot G-5 62 Lakota D-6 •A!, 22 Enterprise D-9 61 Sacajawea E-S 14 Green Gables A-7 TO Saghalie C-8 30 Lake Dolloff G-6 65 Totem G.3 11 Lake Grove 0-6 8 Merit F-6 S, 33 Lakeland F-9 2 Mark Twain F4 29 Meredith Hill H-5 SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS 3 3 6 Mirror Lake E-6 5 Nautilus E-5 Code 15 Olympic View C-7 21 Panther Lake E-8 80 Decatur C-6 37 Rainier View F-10 81 Federal Way E-5 41 Sherwood Forest D-8 83 Thomas Jefferson G-4 8 Harry S.Truman F-6 24 Silver Lake D-7 26 Star Lake G-3 8 Merit F-6 25 Sunnycrest G-2 13 Twin Lakes 8.6 4 27 Valhalla G-4 Future School Sites— 7 Wildwood F-S Surplus Sites I Woodmont F-3 100 Educational Service Center F-6 — 99 Future Support Services E-8 — Code-- 97 Maintenance-opomtiom-Transportation E-6 Parks- A 1 7- FEDERAL WAY. WASHINGTON and VICINI 45. 7 71-fe As N I 8 1 W E 1i i 1 x4 .1 9 pmp� 1W • PAZ D FEDERALi g 10...... WAY 10 (253) 945-2000 K�Ci. & nr� —H G 9 Senior High School Boundaries E G H ----- ---------- - - ------ FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 210 ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS Code Cod*-- 10 Adelaide C4 64 Illah" E-9 • 16 Brigadoon B-8 66 Kilo G-6 2 2 28 Camelot G-5 62 Lakota D-6 22 Enterprise D-9 fit Sa"Jawea E-5 14 Green Gab[ss A-7 70 Saghalie C-8 --I L 30 Lake Dolloff G-6 65 Totem G-3 11 Lake Grove D-6 8 Merit F-6 33 Lakeland F-9 2 Mark Twain F4 29 Meredith Hill H-3 SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS 3 3 6 Mirror Lake E4 5 Nautilus E-3 It Cod*— 15 Olympic III" C-7 21 Panther Lake E4 80 Decatur C-6 37 Rainier View F-11 0 81 Federal Way E-5 41 Sherwood Forest D-8 83 Thomas Jefferson GA 24 Sih,er Lake 0.7 a Harry S.Truman F-6 26 Star Lake G-3 8 Merit F-6 'N 25 Sunnycrest G-2 13 Twin Lakes BE 4 427 Valhalla G4 Future School Sit"— 7 Wildwood F41 Surplus Sites I Woodmont F-3 100 Educational Service Center F-6 Code-- 040, 99 Future Support S*rAces E-S 97 Mainteance-Opomtiom-TmmportAtion E-6 W Parks— -vl-t .. . B I I F7�7 r i5 FEDERAL WAY. WASHINGTON slid VICI 04 -1 91 6 d—A-12Y Av 6. 7 E A J1. s "I S1 91 2•1 1 49 14,N, -,. FE'DERAE15 J1— WAY 000,01" 10 I -!�! aaR ..7M • w.m,4,F.� (253) 945-2000 X"C, me E F G H 10 SECTION 3 SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 3 -SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION Building Capacities -The Education Program Portable Locations Student Forecast- 2000 through 2005 Capacity Summaries King County Impact Fees - Single and Multi Family Units 11 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999100 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Building Capacities This Capital Facilities Plan establishes the District's "standard of service" in order to ascertain the District's current and future capacity. The Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, but these guidelines do not take into consideration the education program needs. The District has identified a Building Program Capacity for each of the schools in the District. This Full Time Equivalent (FTE) capacity is based on: • The number of classrooms available in each school • Any special requirements at each school • The contracted class load by grade level In general, the District's current standard provides that the average class size for a standard classroom for grade K is 24 students for grades 1-6 is 26 students and grades 7-12 is 25 students. Gate (Gifted and Talented Education) classrooms are 25 students, individual education programs classrooms are 15 students, and special education classrooms are 12 students. This size is determined based upon current ratios and trends as well as the classroom physical size. Educational Program Capacities change every year. This analysis is for the 1999/00 school year. The capacity of an individual school could and does change at any time depending on program changes which may require additional space. 12 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITIES ELEMENTARY BUILDING JUNIOR HIGH BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY PROGRAM CAPACITY Adelaide 488 lllahee 821 Brigadoon 528 Kilo 854 Camelot 374 Lakota 741 Enterprise 512 Sacajawea 828 Green Gables 494 Saghalic 768 Lake Dolloff 482 Totem 709 Lake Grove 476 Lakeland 1998 TO YAL1 Mark Twain 503 Meredith Hill 498 Junior High Average 787 Mirror Lake 398 Nautilus 542 SENIOR HIGH BUILDING Olympic View 450 PROGRAM CAPACITY Panther Lake 514 Rainier View 468 Decatur 1,165 Sherwood Forest 550 Federal Way 1,394 Silver Lake 528 Thomas Jefferson 1,373 Star Lake 502 Sunnycrest 462 1998 TOTAL 3,932 wm Lakes Valhalla 494 Scnior High Average 1,311 Wildwood 428 Woodmont 450 ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY 11998 TOTAL 11,131 Merit School Elementary Average 484 1 Truman High School l94 1998 TOTAL 210 Notes: Elementary program capacities are based on the number of teaching stations in the building, contracted class size,and special use classrooms in place during the 99/00 school year. All available instructional space is calculated. Secondary program capacities are based on peak loading. The calculation is based on 25 students per available teaching stations. Capacities were calculated by the Study and Survey Committee. 13 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Portable Locations The Washington State Constitution requires the State to provide each student a basic education. It is not efficient use of District resources to build a school with a capacity for 500 students due to lack of space for 25 students when enrollment fluctuates throughout the year and from year to year. Portables are used as temporary facilities or interim measures to house students until permanent facilities can be built or boundary adjustments can be made. When permanent facilities become available, the portable(s) is either moved to another school for an interim classroom, or used for other purposes such as storage or child care programs. Some portables may not be fit to move due to age or physical condition. In these cases, the District may choose to buy new portables and surplus these unfit portables. It is the practice and philosophy of Federal Way Public Schools that portables are not acceptable as permanent facilities. The following page provides a list of the location of the portable facilities, used for temporary educational facilities by Federal Way Public Schools. 14 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PORTABLE LOCATIONS PORTABLES LOCATED PORTABLES LOCATED AT ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS AT SENIOR HIGHS NON NON NTMUMWAL MnUMONAL LNMUMONAL 0MUMONAL Adelaide 3 Decatur 4 Brigadoon I Federal Way I Camelot I Thomas Jefferson Enterprise 2 Truman/Merit 8 1 Green Gables 1 Lake Dollott Lake Grove 2 Lakeland 2 Mark Twain 3 Meredith Hill 2 PORTABLES LOCATED Mirror Lake 4 AT SUPPORT FACILITIES autt us Olympic View 2 5-Mile Lake 1 Panther Lake 3 MOT I Rainier View 3 Clothing Bank 1 Sherwood Forest 4 Silver Lake 4 TOTAL 3 Star Lake 4 Sunnycrest 1 Twin Lakes 2 1 HEAD START PORTABLES AT DISTRICT SITES Valhalla Wildwood Woodmont 2 Mirror Lake I Sherwood Forest 1 10 A Total 2 PORTABLESLOCATED AT JUNIOR HIGHS NON m+ ucncxAL tlmucno%AL Federal Way Public Academy 5 1 ❑lahee 3 Kilo 3 1 Lakota 3 Sacajawea 2 Saghalie 4 Totem 5 TOTAL 1 25 1 2 15 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Student Forecast Student enrollment projections are a basic component of budget development. Enrollment projections influence many of the financial estimates that go into budget preparation. The majority of staffing requirements are derived directly from the forecasted number of students. Allocations for instructional supplies and materials are also made on the basis of projected enrollment. Other expenditures and certain revenue projections are directly related to enrollment projections. Enrollment projections are completed annually in the Business Services Department. Projections must be detailed at various levels, district total, school-building totals, grade level and program level to include vocational and special education students. The basis of projections has been cohort survival analysis. Cohort survival is the analysis of a group that has a common statistical value (grade level) as it progresses through time. In a stable population the cohort would be 1.00 for all grades. This analysis uses historical information to develop averages and project the averages forward. This method does not trace individual students; it is concerned with aggregate numbers in each grade level. The district has used this method with varying years of history and weighted factors to study several projections. Because transfers in and out of the school system are common, student migration is factored into the analysis as it increases or decreases survival rates. Entry grades (kindergarten) are a unique problem in cohort analysis. The district collects information on birth rates within the district's census tracts, and treats these statistics as a cohort for kindergarten enrollment in the appropriate years. The Federal Way School District is using three distinct methods for projecting student enrollments. The resultant forecasted enrollments are evaluated below. The first method is a statistical cohort analysis that produces ten distinct forecasts. These are forecast of enrollment for one year. The projections vary depending on the number of years of historical information and how they are weighted. The second method uses enrollment-forecasting software tied to a geographic information system. MicroSAMTm software establishes survival, migrant and repeater rates for each grade level in a pre-defined geographic area. These rates are matched to the number of housing units per area. The rates are then used to project the following year's enrollment based on the number of planned new housing units. The software will project for five years. The third method is a projection using an enrollment projection software package that allows the user to project independently at school or grade level and to aggregate these projections for the district level. The Enrollment Master software provides statistical methods including trend line, standard grade progression (cohort) and combinations of these methods. This software produces a five-year projection of school enrollment. 16 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Short-tern budget projections may be more conservative than the standard grade progression model. For the 1999100 school year,the district chose the Enrollment MasterTM projection using standard grade progression model. Standard grade progression is a reasonably accurate method for the near term future when the near future looks much like the near past. Long range projections that establish the need for facilities are a modification of the cohort survival method. The cohort method of analysis becomes less reliable the farther out the projections are made. The Federal Way School District long-range projections are studied annually. The study includes information from the jurisdictional demographers as they project future housing and population in the region. The long-range projections used by Federal Way Public Schools reflect a similar age trend in student populations as the projections published by the Office of Financial management for the State of Washington. Growth Management requires jurisdictions to plan for a minimum of twenty years. The Federal Way School District is a partner in this planning with the various jurisdictions comprising the school district geography. These projections create a vision of the school district in the future. 17 FEDERAL NYAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Full Time Equivalent Enrollment History and Projections Simplified FTE(K Headcount=.5 FTE;Junior High FTE=.989 Headcount;Senior High M-.932 Headcount) Total K-12 Percent School Year Elementary Junior High Senior High FTE Change 1993-94 10.545 4,432 3,750 18,727 1994-95 10,505 4,626 3,758 18,889 0.9% 1995-96 10,689 4,838 3,796 19,323 2.2% 1996-97 10,863 4,930 3,913 19,706 1.9% 1997-9a 11,123 5,073 4,082 20,278 2.8% 1998.99 11,480 5,080 4,120 20,680 1.9% 1999-00 11,622 5,110 4,348 21,079 1.9% P2000-01 11,595 5,178 4,436 21,209 0.6% P2001-02 11,562 5,421 4,465 21,448 1.1% P2002-03 11,535 5,621 4,480 21,636 0.9% + P2003-04 9,699 5,572 6,437 21,708 0.3% P2004-05 9,672 5,570 6,663 21,905 0.9% P2005-06 9,673 5,659 6,716 22,048 0.6% *New Configuratio+ Elementary K-S Middle School6-8 High School 9-11 Enrollment history and Six Year Forecast E 23,000 3.0% i 22,000 21.000 - `O� 20,000 2.0% t O J, � � `RS � •Y 2'" � i Z 19,000 1.5% `u i A 17,000 N 0.5% 16,000 C.P. FM S ,YT `aY ft� :V, •dSI ,yj t 15,00D 0.0% �0� O0<? $L �V 0 0 o� ba 0, a ou 00 School Year LpFTE -r-percent of Change 18 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Capacity Summaries All Grades, Elementary,Junior High, and Senior High Schools The Capacity Summaries combine Building Capacity information and the Student Forecast information. The result demonstrates the requirements for new or remodeled facilities and why there is a need for the District to use temporary facilities or interim measures. The information is organized in spreadsheet format, with a page summarizing the entire District, and then evaluating capacity vs. number of students at elementary, junior high, and senior high levels individually. The notes at the bottom of each spreadsheet provide information about what facilities are in place each year. 19 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARY.ALL GRADES Actual Projected-- CAPACITY 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 BUILDING PROGRAM Z CAPACITY 19,994 19,994 19,968 20,048 < 20,472 21,796 21,770 n Add or subtract changes to capacity K v t+. Special Education Changes (26) (26) (26) c (26) (26) Truman High modernization and expansion 106 Increase Capacity at Three High Schools 450 c New Middle School 800 New High School 0 1,350 Adjusted Program Capacity 19,994 19,968 20,048 1 20,472 21,796 1 21,770 22,570 ENROLLMENT Basic FTE Enrollment 21,079 1 21,209 121,448 1 21,636 t J21A8J21,905 22,048 Internet Academy Enrollment 487 550 600 650 680 105 730 Basic FTE Enrollment without Internet Academy 20,592 20,659 20,848 20,986 21,028 21,200 21,318 SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) PROGRAM CAPACITY (598) (691) (800) (514) 768 570 1,252 RELOCATABLE CAPACITY Current Portable Capacity 2,275 2,275 2,425 2,425 2,425 2,425 2,425 Add/Subtract Portable Capacity Federal Way Public Academy 150 Adjusted Portable Capacity 2,275 2,425 2,425 2,425 2,425 2,425 2,425 SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 1,677 1,734 1,625 1,911 3,193 2,995 3,677 20 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPI.TAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARY-ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS Actual -- Projected-- CAPACITY 1999 2000 2001 2002 2 2003 2003 2004 BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY 11,131 11,131 11,105 11,079 11,053 11,027 11,001 c n n 0 I. Special Education Changes (26) (26) (26) ', (26) (26) ao c z Adjusted Program Capacity 11,131 111,105 11,079 11,053 a 11,027 11,001 11,001 ENROLLMENT Basic FTE Enrollment 11,622 11,595 11,562 1 11,535 1 9,699 9,672 9,673 2. Internet Academy 138 150 150 150 130 130 130 9 Basic FTE Enrollment without Internet Academy 11,484 11,445 11,412 11,385 9,569 9,542 ,543 SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) PROGRAM CAPACITY (353) (340) (333) (332) 1,453 1,459 1,458 RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 3. Current Portable Capacity 1,325 1,325 1,400 1,400 1,350 1,350 1,350 Add/Subtract portable capacity 75 Move to High School (50) Adjusted Portable Capacity 1,325 1,400 1 1,400 1,350 1,350 1,350 1,350 SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 972 1,060 1 1,067 1 1,018 2,808 2,809 2,808 NOTES: 1. Add Programs 3 ECEAP, 1 SBD(Severely Behavioral Disordered)and 1 Pre-School Program. This reduces Basic Education capacity in the school years indicated. 2. Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities. 3. Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available. This is a calculated number only. The actual number of portables that will be used will be based upon actual population needs. 21 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARY-JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS Actual -- Projected-- CAPACITY 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY 4,721 4,721 4,721 4,721 n 4,721 4,721 4,721 n G O 1. Add New Middle School 8Q0 , a oa c n o' Adjusted Program Capacity 4,721 4,721 4,721 47721 ' 4,721 1 4,721 5,521 ENROLLMENT Basic FTE Enrollment 5,110 5,178 5,421 5,621 5,572 5,570 5,659 2. Internet Academy 185 200 225 250 275 275 275 Basic FTE Enrollment without Internet Academy 4,925 4,978 5,196 5,371 5,297 5,295 5,384 SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) PROGRAM CAPACITY T204) (257) (475) (650) (576) (574) 137 RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 3. Current Portable Capacity 625 625 700 700 700 700 700 Add/Subtract portable capacity 4. Federal Way Public Academy 75 Adjusted Portable Capacity 625 700 700 700 700 700 700 SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 421 443 225 50 124 126 837 NOTES: 1. Add new middle school 2. Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities.. 3. Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available. This is a calculated number only. The actual number of portables that will be used will be based upon actual population needs. 4 Federal Way Public Academy will increase capacity atone junior high site. 22 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999100 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARY-SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS Actual -- Projected-- CAPACITY 1999 2000 1 2001 2002 Z 2003 2004 2005 BUILDING PROGRAM ; CAPACITY 4,142 4,142 4,142 42248 t7 4,698 6,048 6,048 a Add or subtract changes in capacity n 1. Truman Remodel 106 2. Add Capacity to Three High Schools 450 e; rz 3. Add New High School 1,350 w O Adjusted Program Capacity 4,142 4,142 4,248 4,69E 6,048 1 6,048 6,048 ENROLLMENT Basic FTE Enrollment 4,348 4,436 4,465 4.480 6,437 6,663 6,716 4. Internet Academy 164 200 225 250 275 300 325 Basic Ed without Internet Academy 4,184 4,236 4,240 4,230 6,162 6,363 6,391 SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) PROGRAM CAPACITY (42) (94) 8 468 (114) (315) (343) RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 5. Current Portable Capacity 325 325 325 325 375 375 375 Add\Subtract portable capacity Add from Elementary 50 Adjusted Portable Capacity 325 325 325 r 375 1 375 375 375 SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 283 231 333 843 261 60 32 NOTES: 1. Truman High School modernization and expansion 2. Add capacity to three existing high schools 3. Add new high school 4. Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities. 5. Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available. This is a calculated number only. The actual number of portables that will be used will be based upon actual population needs. 23 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN King County, the City of Federal Way, and the City of Kent Impact Fee Calculations Single and Multi-Family Residences Each jurisdiction that imposes school impact fees requires that developers pay these fees to help cover a share of the impact of new housing developments on school facilities. To determine an equitable fee throughout unincorporated King County, a formula was established. This formula can be found in King County Code 21A and was also substanially adopted by the City of Federal Way and Kent. The formula requires the District to establish a "Student Generation Factor" which estimates how many students will be added to a school district by each new single or multi-family unit and to gather some standard construction costs,which are unique to that district. - STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR ANALYSIS Federal Way Public Schools student generation factor was determined separately for single family units and multi-family units. The factors used in the 1999/00 Capital Facilities Plan were derived using actual generation factors from single family units and multi-family units, which were constructed in the last five- (5) years. - IMPACT FEE CALCULATION Following the calculations for the student generation factor is a copy of the Impact Fee Calculation for single family and multi-family units based on King County Code 21A and the Growth Management Act. Single Family Units Multi-Family Units 24 0 raOa�Tj5 p'Tf u O O D O M O 2 co � a O q U vMi crD N N ~ N U. M N V' tD m `w to v O O O ~ LL. m N O O O C O C C C O O O O G L m V• V' O f� cn a0 t0 t th lD [OD m ... '- N e- QN sQ��• 1� O m�. C �• to N 1� V' O C (7 y C f7 co N fC y tNn co N N f� p t�0 N a '•' M M 10 M m C" cyl 0 w V' cn 00 iN e- O V M c0 t-- O C u' , O r N N r• �- C y N LL• CO S O O �. try O C C G O G O O O ci c,0 0 0 0 r— m to O p th O n m c0 p Op CO CO) C; O V' OCF) N p O M P- N O ppp v C O n O 00i 0 [�+l co N M O CCi O O r t, to C N V O N t� tD h N V V O V• to N U tp V m 1- W O M O N to N e- U to C.) m O a NLL' 000 CN7 M .N- ON O a2ti NNN � O G G G O O O C C O •1�- O O G r• c7 m c7 O c'J ti N cD CO r N v O m to M r m ..+ ` OO ,v... C '�' M 'V N O C.) N V co O1 CCi •C U r• N � VO' O cM sO� M QOI v Obi cu 9 O N CND to O A � mt0NpOOp tV v to r• N c%l N y V to N N O eE.r N LL• N VO R N M N � O CEi co LL' O O z W 0 0 O d 0 0 0 0 G O 111 0 0 0 to O m N O O] N C (••- E = N cD M N Q N In m O c0., CO E N o N M J V Z aiN Z uN c N N e 0 0 O O C N ,�; O L H O C •.. U C L �• U C F- .0 N .0 CN O cV V r. N m 0 CDtti O .M•- co C m N a co to e- U U U c caz � zvN � Zah �, zo Ln N U cn i N '3 [zi] o O C E t? c a :9 c 00 o coo p0) lON m •� A nammto N —� U cnLn E E COI v � � rn .- .- � � a to O " = " coL. = 0 u u e z 0 z W m c c i .0 cy - 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O A LL '_ v r N coN 1 E d E V N N V c7 Z a (..7 0 — N I i I O TN Lc. E tr E m m C O 2 (n m U n a EU v N tD N N`c7 o CD CV rn E v •d O CD cm Zt I z z E W to W10 L O_j a. 02 c N > U O FO• WQ 'C L O W U CO , *0 W m Y O ixdcU ( qm O d 5 O a to d 'coo � o `—° v E E N x � C7 �jSmC0wo ' aDHUU TO N rnSco�r;t�miDtn q �Lv c , rn aim rn m rn rn rn rn rn FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN IMPACT FEE School Site Acquisition Cost: Student Student Facility Cost/ Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Acreage Acre Capacity SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary 0.00 $0 484 0.2939 0.0656 $0 $0 _...__..._..__. __..._...___.... __....._._..._..._ ........._.__.. _.._.._._. .__.__.._.r .... Middle School 20.00 550,000 800 0.1530 0.0246 $191 $31 _.._...._....._. _._....._._.__... ..._.._._. _.___.._...._._..._.___... .._..........._____._. Sr High 40.00 $80,000 1,350 0.1548 0.0656 $367 $155 TOTAL $558 S186 School Construction Cost: Student Student %Penn Facd Facility Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Total Sq Ft Cost Capacity SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary 96.70% $0 484 0.2939 0.0656 $0 $0 Middle School 96�70% $17:000,000 800 O.1530 0.0246 $3,144 $505 Sr High 96.70% 540,800,000 1,350 0.1548 0.0656 $4,524 $1,917 TOTAL S7,668 $2,423 Temporary Facility Cost: Student Student %Temp Fac. Facility Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Total Sq Ft Cost Size SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary 3.30% $60,374 25 0.2939 0.0656 S23 $5 .............._.._. ._..__ .......... ...._...................: ...._..........._..�._....._. ._... Middle School 3 30% $60,374 _ 2a 0.1530 0.0246 $12 $2 Sr High 3.30% $60,374 25 0.1548 0.0656 S12 S5 TOTAL S48 S12 State Matching Credit Calculation: Student Student Boeck Cost/ Sq.Ft. State Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Sq Ft Student Match SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary $101.39 0 0.00% 0.2939 0.0656 $0 $0 Middle School $101.39 110 0.00% 0.1530 0.0246 SO $0 ......_........._..___ .__._.. __........ .._..._......_..._. ._------ ______._ . .._._656 New Sr High $101.39 120 60.62% 0.l548 0.0656 $1,142 $484 Total $1,142 S484 Tax Payment Credit Calculation SFR MFR Average Assessed Value (April 2000) S16_3,436 $45,536 Capital Bond Interest Rate(April 2000) _5.94%� _ 5.94% Net Present Value of Average Dwelling 51,206,330 _5336_104 Years Amortized 10 �10 Property Tax Levy Rate $1.42 $1.42_ Present Value of Revenue Stream S1,713 $477 Single Family Multi-Family Residences Residences Mitigation Fee Summary Site Acquisition Cost S 558 $ 186 Permanent Facility Cost S 7,668 S 2,423 Temporary Facility Cost S 48 S 12 State Match Credit S (1,142) $ (484) Tar Payment Credit $ (1,713) $ (477) Sub-Total S 5,419 S 1,660 50%Local Share S 2,710 S 830 Impact Fee $ 2,710 $ 830 26 r r.ua:avw rvr�a .vua..a�.u SECTION 4 SUMMARY OF CHANGES FROM 1998/99 PLAN FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 4 SUMMARY OF CHANGES FROM THE 1999100 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN The 1999100 Capital Facilities Plan is an updated document, based on the 1998/99 Capital Facilities Plan. The changes between the 1998/99 Plan and the 1999/00 Plan are listed below. SECTION I -THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN INVENTORY OF EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES Marketing Academy is removed from the inventory INVENTORY OF UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY Site 85 is added to inventory—purchased site for the new senior high school. NEEDS FORECAST - NEW FACILITIES New High School site has been purchased and is removed from the needs forecast. MOT Site is removed from the needs forecast. This project is not actively being planned at this time. The current MOT site is not for sale at this time. SIX YEAR FINANCE PLAN The Six Year Finance Plan has been rolled forward to reflect 2000/2005 27 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 1 SECTION III - SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION CAPACITY The average capacity of senior high schools is increased from 1232 to 1311. This change is a result of analysis of current building use and programs in place for the 1999/00 school year, Building Program Capacities are found on page 13. PORTABLES The list of portables reflects the movement of portables between facilities or new portables purchased. Portable Locations can be found on page 15. STUDENT FORECAST The Student Forecast now covers 1999 through 2005. The new forecast reflects a decreased rate of growth. Enrollment History and Projections are found on page 18. CAPACITY SUMMARY The changes in the Capacity Summary are a reflection of the changes in the capacities and student forecast. New schools and increased capacity at current buildings are shown as increases to capacity. Capacity Summaries are found on pages 20-23. IMPACT FEE CALCULATION - KING COUNTY CODE 21A The Impact Fee Calculations have changed due to changes in several factors. The adjustment made in the Impact Fee Calculation, causing a change in the Impact Fee between the 1998/99 Capital Facilities Plan and the 1999/00 Capital Facilities Plan can be found on page 29. 26 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999100 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN IMPACT FEE CALCULATION CHANGES FROM 1998/99 TO 1999100 STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS Student Generation factors are based on rates for new developments constructed over a period of not more than five years prior to the date of the fee calculation. The changes in student Generation factors between the 1999/00 Capital Facilities Plan and the 1998/99 Capital Facilities Plan are due to developments that were deleted or added based upon the age of the developments. Student allocation is also changed to reflect the middle school configuration. The Student General worksheet is found on page 25. EMPACT FEE Item From/To Comment Percent of Permanent Facilities 96.95 to Report#3 OSPI 96.70% Percent Temporary Facilities 3.05% to Updated portable inventory 3.30% Temporary Facility Cost $62,368 to Updated cost of most recently $60,374 purchased portables Boeck Cost/Sq. Ft $99.68 to Change per OSPI $101.39 Sq. Ft. Student/Middle School 112 to Square Foot Allocation change from 110 Junior High to Middle School State Match 59.89% to Change per OSPI 60.62% Average Assessed Value SFR - Per Puget Sound Educational Service $153.095 to District (ESD 121) $163,436 MFR - $35,488 To$45,536 Capital Bond Interest Rate 5.11% to Market Rate 5.94% 29 REPORTS FROM STANDING COMMITTEES AND STAFF A. COUNCIL PRESIDENT Ael a G�a C� ACQ_ B. OPERATIONS COMMITTEE / C. PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE / D. PUBLIC WORKS U44* et a S m E. PLANNING COMMITTEE 621yl v — rn GL-�� F. PARKS COMMITTEE G. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS viz+-PQ, kaA-0 5Tr- t 6 S. D eri au-o ,,,-,,,, � 11�vD or �� �e b 3. 4-0 �.c�� �f-�a,c,V, �� REPORTS FROM SPECIAL COMMITTEES Pi( �G �, �dL .tee � ya PARKS COMMITTEE MINUTES NOVEMBER 14, 2000 COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Judy Woods, Tom Brotherton, Connie Epperly STAFF PRESENT: John Hodgson, Lori Flemm,Doug Siegert, David Heldt, Shawn Wilson, Jay Hill, Julie Romano, Todd Lawber, Tammy Edmiston, Katherin Johnson, Jackie Bicknell, PUBLIC PRESENT: Mary Morrill, Ann Likely, Wes House The meeting was called to order by Chair Judy Woods at 4:00 PM. Approval of Minutes of September 12, 2000 Committee Member Tom Brotherton moved to approve the minutes of September 12, 2000. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Connie Epperly and passed 3-0. Park Naming— Morrill Meadows Park Parks Director John Hodgson said that in 1995 the City of Kent bought property on 248`h from Mary Morrill for a new park. Planning for the park has taken place over the last year and a half and construction is now underway. Morrill Meadows Park will provide a large picnic area and eventually will be joined to East Hill Park. Some of the meadows in the back of the park, as well as a hazelnut grove, will be preserved and the park will incorporate active open fields in an urban area. The park will be completed by the middle of December, 2000 except for the grass, and should be made available to the public by mid June-July, 2001. The City's Park Naming Ordinance stipulates there be a major reason why a park is named after someone. M. M. Morrill was a banker in Kent and one of its first mayors. He also participated in the State Legislature. The Morrill family homesteaded the property and lived there until 1995. Mr. Hodgson expressed that it was critical to preserve the history of the area and to preserve the Morrill name. He recommended naming the park at 148`h and 106`h the Morrill Meadows Park in recognition of the Morrill family. Parks staff will consult with the Morrill family to determine how the family should be recognized as the park is developed. Mr. Hodgson added that the Historical Society will help the Parks Department put together a history guide of all the City parks, along with park operations information. Judy Woods stated there should be something on site to allow more recent residents in Kent to understand the commitment the Morrill family had made over the years. Mary Morrill addressed the Committee and said she was very pleased that the park would be named after her father. Connie Epperly moved to name the new park at 1061h and 2481h Street, Morrill Meadows Park. The motion was seconded by Tom Brotherton and passed 3-0. Parks Conumnee, 11/14/00 Page 2 King County YSFA— Service Club Ballfields—Accent and Amend the Budget _ Parks Planning and Development Superintendent Lori Flemm said a letter was received from King County Executive Ron Sims recommending a$50,000 King County Youth Sports Facility Grant for the Service Club Ballfields to help finance the construction of four fields at 144`h and 288`h Streets. Construction should begin in the summer of 2001. The fields will be seeded by the middle of September next year, and the grass allowed to develop a good rooting system before play could begin. Ms. Fl,-mm spoke in recognition of the work of Park's staff Helen Wickstrom and Shane Gilber-son in developing the grant application. John Hodgson mentioned that the Parks Department is in line for another $300,000 grant on the project. A grant for $300,000 has aireadv been received from the state and $140,000 from the service clubs, as well as the current S50,OC�O grant. Staff is in the process of sending letters out to the service clubs informing them that th.- next piece of funding is the in-kind donations. The service clubs participated and worked together with the City of Kent in obtaining the grants, and the project will definitely be recognized as a community service project when the ballfields are completed. Tom Brotherton moved to accept the $50,000 King County Youth Sports Facilities Grant and amend the Service Club Ballfields Project Budget. The motion was seconded by Connie Epperly and passed 3-0. Citv of Auburn Home Repair Contract Housing and Human Services Manager Katherin Johnson said the City of Auburn approached Kent stiff last September to talk about the feasibility of Kent doing Auburn's Home Repair Program. Auburn currently contracts with the King County Housing Authority but could not provid_ minor home repairs, so they looked into the programs of neighboring cities. Kent is one of the few cities and the largest city that does its own program. Kent staff put together a proposal between the two cities outlining what Kent would be willing to do, and presented it to the Ciry of Auburn's Planning and Community Development Committee. The biggest seller for Auburn's Planning Director was the fact that he had just paid $600 for a hot water tank that would haN e cost Kent about $225. The proposal provides a 0.75 FTE, 200 minor repairs, service to 40 unduplicated City of Auburn clients, and 15 major home repairs. 5125,000 in funding is available and the City of Kent would receive 1/12`h of that amount monthly. Ten percent would be allowed for administration costs, secretarial work, and a lead specialist to do the first inspections. A truck would be rented and materials provided, and Kent would be fully reimbursed for all costs of services. The project would be evaluated after one year to determine what direction to take for the future. Connie Epperly moved to approve the Auburn Home Repair Program and authorize the Mayor to execute an Interlocal Agreement with the City of Auburn. The motion was seconded by Tom Brotherton and passed 3-0. Off Leash Dog Park Update John Hodgson said a group of citizens had approached the City asking that an off-leash dog area be created in Kent. Staff promised to meet with the group to address the issue within the Parks Comrnittee, 11/14/00 Page 3 community and a meeting was held to look at the pros and cons of that kind of park. The meeting allowed staff to receive information from dog owners about what is critical and important to them for a successful dog facility. An agreement was made to bring the issue to the Parks Committee to receive direction on the process. Mr. Hodgson said every dog in the City of Kent has the right to use City parks, but they have to be on a leash. There is a need in urban areas for a space where dogs are allowed to run free. King County and the City of Seattle have several off-leash dog areas. Some are successful and some are not. King County has a very large off-leash area at the 40 acre Marymoor Park in Redmond. It is the second largest off-leash park in the country and probably the most successful. Mr. Hodgson said such a park is needed in South King County as there are lots of dog owners, but he cautioned that the most important thing was to do a park the right way. Other communities around the state and country have had a lot of experience doing off-leash parks and much can be learned from those communities. Park directors in other South King County jurisdictions have indicated they are entering the same process as Kent in talking about off-leash parks. They have agreed to get together as a group some time before the holidays to discuss the issue and to form a plan on how to address it from a South King County standpoint. Auburn has stated they want to be part of the discussions because they are getting calls asking for that kind of park, and King County Parks has indicated they would be willing to participate. King County has been successful with off-leash parks and may be able to help create a regional facility. Mr. Hodgson stated it was critical to find out what - other cities were doing to determine what would be best for the community and region. If only one city builds a park, it could be too small for the area. A large area would be needed and Kent's recent land acquisition at Clark Lake would provide a spot large enough for an off-leash park. Tom Brotherton mentioned that he had used Marymoor Park with his dog. The park is very large and separated from its neighbors by a clear space. Mr. Brotherton questioned what the environmental impact might be from the traffic on trails around the water. John Hodgson responded that there were water issues at Marymoor Park and there have been discussions about shutting the water off from the dogs. He clarified that environmental concerns would be addressed, especially if there were potentially sensitive areas to consider. Lori Flemm added that if certain sites were identified, they would be run through specific criteria to see what the environmental impacts would be. Ms. Flemm said that when staff met with the dog owners at the public meeting, a list was created of desirable elements for a park that would make it successful, such as size, drinking water, available parking, etc. John Hodgson added that there was a lot of information available through the National Park and Recreation community about the successes and failures of off-leash dog areas and how to mitigate some of the issues. He also suggested that the Suburban Cities Association could be asked to provide further direction, and said Parks staff would continue to communicate with Kent citizens via a large email list. Staff is looking to Council for direction on whether to do more research with the other cities or to form a task force that would look into the issue and then report back to Council. Tom Brotherton commented that such a facility would be desirable and would provide a service, but could also be a bad neighbor. The location should be rural and isolated rather than in an Parks Committee, 11/14/00 Page 4 urban area. Judy Woods said she would like to see a regional approach taken. Connie Epperly susgested that the Urban Separator areas could be used for such a park, and John Hodgson added the possibility of using a landfill as a suitable site. He said there are many landfills around the area that aren't close to anything or anyone and have plenty of open space. Landfills have been used for golf courses and soccer fields and may work for off-leash sites. John Hodgson introduced Wes House, an active participant in the off-leash dog park issue and volunteer liaison between City staff and dog owners. Mr. House stated there was an anxious group of people interested in the outcome of discussions and the direction the City would take. He explained that dog owners don't want to make waves,but do need an area where they can allow their dogs to run off-leash. Mr. Hodgson said a report from the other jurisdictions would be brought to the next Parks Committee meeting on January 9, 2001. Recreation Department Presentation Recreation and Cultural Services Superintendent Lori Hogan introduced Recreation Manager Doug Siegert. Ms. Logan stated that she was incredibly proud of the Recreation Services staff and the work they do in recreational programming. Mr. Siegert introduced the Kent Parks, Recreation and Community Services staff: Program Coordinators David Heldt, Jay Hill, Tammy Edmiston, Todd Lawber, and Shawn Wilson, and Administrative Assistant Julie Romano. Doug Siegert presented a Powerpoint presentation detailing the activities of the Recreation Division which organizes programming for youth and adult athletics in Recreation, Cultural Arts, Fitness, Leisure, and Community Education. The division also provides central registration, information, and data support for the entire department, and manages the Kent Commons, the Kent Memorial Park Building and Complex, the Russell Road Softball Complex, and a variety of sports fields throughout the City, as well as being in charge of rentals for seven City parks. Program Evaluations are provided for all the programs and classes and are used to keep them as current and as popular as possible. Each year over 35,000 individual participant names are entered into the data base. Youth Sports Programming: Annually there are from 530-580 organized youth sports teams, and gyre and field space is provided for over 7,000 kids. The T-Ball Toss Ball Program, which is an entry level baseball program for grades K-2, requires the use of 26 elementary schools and a variety of Kent sites to complete a season. Competition for field space is very high. Combining the 85 T-Ball Toss Ball teams with an additional 278 teams in youth baseball, softball, and adult softball means there are roughly 360 teams that are looking for space in a five month period for practices and games. That doesn't include all the other user groups that are asking for that same space. The Youth Basketball Program involves approximately 2,000 kids, and 36 Kent school sites and the Kent Commons are used to get through the season. The Basketball Jamboree kicks off the season for grades 4-6 with 125 teams and 1200 kids participating (along with their parents). All are crammed into the Kent Commons to play basketball for a day and a half on a Friday evening and all day Saturday. Parks Committee, 11/14/00 Page 5 Another great program is the Youth Soccer Program. Games are played on Saturdays at the u Commons Playfields and 100-115 teams and over 1400 kids participate. The Soccer Jamboree kicks off the season with youth participating on two separate Saturdays in September. The Kent Commons parking lot, the Metro Park and Ride, and the Borden Field parking lot are all filled on those occasions. During the regular season approximately 300 cars and 12 teams per hour come to the Commons Playfields for soccer games. This year the Youth Track Program included 25 elementary schools and involved over 1000 kids. Meets are held on the Commons Playfields Monday through Thursday and the program extends from March through about the first week in May. Each day, Monday through Thursday, 250 participants are involved with about 500 spectators. A season ending meet at Kent-Meridian High School's French Field is held with the Junior Olympics and involves over 800 participants and about 3000 spectators. Other sports and youth programming are Youth Flag Football,junior high Volleyball Programs, and a variety of Youth Sports Camps throughout the summer and holidays. There are also a variety of skill competitions where kids can compete locally and then go on to the state or national level competitions. The Youth Sports Programs could not happen without the volunteers. In the Youth Baseball Program alone there are 78 volunteer head coaches that put in 7000 service hours during the season. Annually, over 600 volunteer coaches log in over 50,000 service hours. Another big area in Youth Sports Programming is the Youth Sports Sponsorship Program with literally hundreds of business and individuals in the Kent community each year sponsoring a sports team by giving $100. Over $50,000 is donated annually for that purpose, There are also employment opportunities in the Youth Sports Programming for junior and senior high school students and over 250 are employed each year as officials. Adult Athletics: Approximately 300 adult teams annually participate in softball, baseball, volleyball, and flag football. Basketball and volleyball programs are held at the Kent Commons, and flag football is held at a variety of City parks and playfields. The Adult Softball Programs are played at the Russell Road Softball Complex, the Kent Memorial Park Fields, and the Commons Playfields. This year, 1700 games were played that involved over 3,100 participants. These programs bring 102,000 people to downtown Kent in a four month season. The Russell Road Softball Complex is also rented by local and regional promoters for tournament play and this year 442 teams competed in 17 tournaments. The tournament season is May through about the 2❑d week in September and benefits many businesses in downtown Kent such as restaurants and hotels and motels. Community Education: Over 1,000 classes are offered annually in Community Education and include Cultural Arts,Fitness, and Leisure Programming. The Parks Program Guide goes out four times a year and lists 250-300 recreational programs. Classes include Dog Obedience and Dog Agility Classes, Cooking Classes (held at the Resource Center and Senior Center), Youth Creative and Cultural Arts Classes, Pre-School Activity Classes, and Adult Fitness (including _ Aerobics, Yoga, and Martial Arts classes). Dance Recitals are a definite highlight in Community Education and are held each year involving the kids that participate in the Youth Dance Classes. Parks Committee, 11/14/00 Page 6 The Spring Recital is held at the Kentwood Performing Arts Center, and the Winter Recital, held at the Senior Center, involves over a thousand dancers and typically 2500 spectators. The Indoor Park Program is for ages 11 months to 5 years and is a traditional park program held inside the Kent Commons where it's warm and doesn't rain. The program is drop-in and averages about 75 kids per day and 4500 kids annually. Management of the Kent Commons: The Kent Commons is the City's only recreation community center. The Commons offers a full range of services during its business hours from 6:00 AM to 10:00 PM, Monday through Friday, and from 8:00 AM to 10:00 PM on Saturdays. During business hours, people can register for classes, park rentals, room rentals,be involved in ticket sales, or just enjoy the amenities of the Kent Commons, which include a variety of drop-in classes, aerobics, basketball, a fully equipped weight room, racquetball courts, and fully equipped locker rooms with showers. The Kent Commons also offers a number of meeting rooms and reception halls, and each year the Commons and the Kent Memorial Park Building have approximately 70 to 90 wedding receptions. A number of meeting rooms are available to the public for rental. Weekend Trade Show business has been very good. The Boeing Employees' Train Swap Meet ,,vas held November 11, 2000 and in 6%z hours, 1800 people came through the doors. Probably the most popular show is the Amish Quilt and Craft Sale in August with about 4000 people coming through in three days. The next big show coming up is the Holiday Bazaar held the first weekend in December. The Kent Commons has about 500,000 visitors each year. Passive parks: There are a number of passive parks situated throughout the City from Tot Lots to Fishing Holes to pavilions that people use for business meetings and wedding receptions. The Recreation Division rents out seven of those parks each year encompassing over 500 rental groups and 25,000 people visitors. Mr. Siegert handed out brochures from Recreation Services and suggested that citizens check out the Recreation Division information under the Parks Department on the City's website. He said Nveb based registration would soon be available for future classes. John Hodgson added that the Parks Department was working with a company that handles city municipal parks and recreation registration software. When asked by Tom Brotherton about the limits for the playing fields, Doug Siegert said that Parks staff has a great working relationship with the Kent School District and each year tries to get as many schools as possible. The programs are open to anybody and playing times are adjusted to fit all the kids in. Judy Woods asked if the length of the matches or games were restricted in order to accommodate everybody. Mr. Siegert said the time of play or number of innings may be limited in order to get through the softball and baseball season. The length of basketball games are limited quite often because of the number of teams; but the goal is to not put limits on the games. Most people want to play the correct amount of innings, but that is impossible when so many teams are involved. More fields with lights would allow more games with regulation time. Parks Committee, 11/14/00 Page 7 John Hodgson said that when the Borden Playfields are replaced on the East Hill,the new park would have lights. Tom Brotherton commented that adding lights seemed a cost effective way of getting more people into the program. Connie Epperly mentioned that putting up lights at the Commons Playfields had previously been discussed. John Hodgson said adding lights would be included as part of the Master Planning Process, but neighbors would have to agree to the lights and later play at night. Most new parks are built around residential areas and the lighting industry has done a phenomenal job in aiming light to make sure that it doesn't off load into the neighborhoods. Tom Brotherton asked how full the Commons programs were and if people were turned away from programs. Doug Siegert said specific classes could have limits because of the size of the room, or an instructor could place a limit. Classes such as cooking, dog obedience, and a variety of kids' preschool ballet classes have fill limits, but to provide more openings, classes are also held at Kent schools, the Kent Memorial Park building, the Senior Center, and the Resource Center. A number of businesses for weekend trade show rentals have been turned away because they needed certain weekends that were already filled by someone else. When that happens, staff recommends that those shows call Renton or Tukwila. The meeting was adjourned at 5:05 PM. Jackie Bicknell City Council Secretary SPECIAL PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE MINUTES DECEMBER 11, 2000 COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Tim Clark, Connie Epperly, Rico Yingling STAFF PRESENT: Don Wickstrom, Roger Lubovich, Robyn Bartelt, Tom Brubaker, Jackie Bicknell PUBLIC PRESENT: Jim Rust, Elsy Rust The meeting was called to order by Chair Tim Clark at 4:06 PM. Approval of Minutes of November 20, 2000 Committee Member Rico Yingling moved to approve the minutes of November 20, 2000. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Connie Epperly and passed 3-0. Sewer Latecomer Agreement Public Works Director Don Wickstrom said a Latecomer Agreement is executed when a developer has extended the sewer service and later built properties connect to it. Those properties reimburse the City for their share of the total cost,and then the City reimburses the developer. The properties don't pay until they actually connect. The current Latecomer Agreement is for the Rhododendron Estates development on 124`h in the vicinity of 261'. Connie Epperly moved to recommend council authorization for the Public Works Director to execute a sanitary sewer latecomer agreement for Rhododendron Estates. The motion was seconded by Rico Yingling and passed 3-0. Allev Vacation Between Is` and tad Avenues Don Wickstrom said a valid petition had been received for vacation of the alley between 1"and 2"d Avenues for the Sound Transit Commuter Rail Station garage. The alley goes between the properties Sound Transit bought to build the garage on, north of Smith to Temperance and from 2"d Avenue to 1" Avenue. A hearing date must be set for the alley vacation. Rico Yingling moved to recommend to Council adoption of a resolution setting a public hearing date for the alley vacation between 15L and 2"d Avenues and Temperance and Smith Streets. The motion was seconded by Connie Epperly and passed 3-0. WSDOT Grant Agreement. 277th Street Reconstruction Don Wickstrom said the WSDOT Grant Agreement was for Auburn's part of the project from Auburn Way North to the freeway. The project is about $5,000,000 short in the overall budget, and the state has asked that Kent (who will be doing the construction management) submit for additional funds to make up the financial gap. $1,942,119 funding has been received from the state and Auburn is submitting a request to the Transportation Improvement Board for an additional $2,000,000. Some design changes will save money and if the Transportation Improvement Board approves the grant increase, the gap should be funded. Public Works Committee, 12/11/00 Page 2 Tim Clark asked if there was any consideration for change of the access ramps coming off of SR 167 onto 272nd. Mr. Wickstrom said that would be considered in Phase III, the part of the project that the County is funding. That portion has a$2,500,000 shortfall from being 100% funded,but the county has received$940,000 from this same WSDOT grant, as the grant application was a joint application for the County and the City. Rico Yingling moved to authorize the Mayor to sign the grant agreement, direct staff to accept the grant in the amount of$1,942,119 and establish a budget for the funds to be used within the South 277`h Street Reconstruction Project—West Valley Highway to Auburn Way North. The motion was seconded by Connie Epperly and passed 3-0. West Hill Signal Traffic Interconnect Don Wickstrom said the West Hill Signal Traffic Interconnect project had already been bid and an award should be coming to Council on January 2, 2001. $125,000 had been budgeted for the interconnect on Kent Kangley. That project is now done and there is money left over. Staff is proposing to use the left over money to do interconnections of the signal systems on the West Hill since they aren't connected to the master control system. Interconnection of the signals would help give central control over all the City's signals, as well as some operated by the state and county, and would bring coordination between the lights and put them on a program basis rather than an independent time basis. Rico Yingling asked if the state and county were giving control of the traffic lights to the City of Kent. Don Wickstrom said the lights would be on the City's control system and could be adjusted based on need instead of time of day. On 272°d from Pacific Highway South to Military Road, there are a combination of day signals and counting signals with no coordination between them. The interconnect would allow the City, state, and county to work together to coordinate the lights. Connie Epperly moved to recommend to Council authorization to transfer the funds from the Kent Kangley Interconnect project to fund the West Hill Signal Traffic Interconnect project. The motion was seconded by Rico Yingling and passed 3-0. Speed Limit on South 277th Don Wickstrom said several studies had been done confirming that 85% of the traffic on the downhill of South 277`h do not abide by the speed limit of 40 MPH, so the proposal is to increase the speed limit to 50 MPH from the 108`h Street bridge to D Street NE in Auburn. The speed limit is 40 MPH on the rest of the road from 116`h to the 108`h bridge area. The change will be incorporated into a housecleaning ordinance on parking. Garbage Contracts Don Wickstrom said that in November, 1999,because of the 1-695 issue, staff recommended the City getting out of the garbage business because contracts for both the garbage service and residential recycling and yard waste program would expire at the end of March 2001. I-695 has been found to be unconstitutional and adjusting the rates is not an issue any more. In lieu of the coming March 30, 2001 contract expiration date and the possibility of a turf war between the two haulers, it is recommended the City stay in the garbage business. Public Works Committee, 12/11/00 Page 3 Staff has been negotiating with the two haulers. There are only two contracts: Allied/Rabanco/Kent Disposal which services the old downtown area and the single family residences, and Waste Management/RST which services the industrial valley. Another issue is with the Meridian, Meridian Valley, and Del Mar annexation areas that were under state franchise. In the Meridian annexation area, the existing hauler has the right to service the area for an additional five years after annexation. The City was faced with the issue of bringing those residential customers on line and incorporating them into the City's recycling program, but not having the ability to fund it. This proposal converts the Meridian, Meridian Valley, and Del Mar annexations, and the original Kent area all to the same service and the intent is to provide a uniform service'throughout the entire City. Included in the garbage service fee would be a fee for recycling. The homeowner wouldn't be mandated to do recycling, but would pay for recycling as part of their garbage service. The program is the same that exists now in the Meridian, Meridian Valley and Del Mar annexation areas. Customers would still have the 90 gallon container for recycling versus the 32 gallon the county has. There would be a rate increase associated with the changes. The residential one can rate would increase 21%. The commercial and industrial account rates would be averaged and then escalated against the CPI and any dump fee increases. Mr. Wickstrom said the item would be brought back to the first Public Works Committee meeting in January, 2001 and taken to the second Council meeting in January for adoption. It takes 30 days after execution before the rates can go into effect, but that would give time for some PR work to advise the citizens of the increase before the expiration of the old contracts. City Attorney Roger Lubovich added that the 10 year franchise agreement contracts that expire at the end of March, 2001 would be rolled over to Waste Management and Kent Disposal and the haulers would remain status quo with their territory, including the areas that have been annexed into the City. For future annexations, the hauler operating in the area would keep the area. Haulers are entitled by law to operate seven years under a franchise in a territory in their existing situation. This agreement allows them to operate for seven years under the franchise terms. If the contract was half way through its 10 year renewal when an annexation occurred, the haulers could operate for seven years which would put them two years beyond the extension and they would still be operating under the terms of their franchise agreement. The agreement allows customers to have the same haulers as they now have and ensures there would be no territory disputes. Also, the City gets free pickup from all its facilities under the contracts. Mr. Lubovich suggested an amendment to Chapter 703 of the City Code relating to solid waste because it is outdated and needs to be made consistent with the terms of the contract. Tim Clark protested that the rate increase for Kent from $10.98, Meridian Valley from$12.20, and Sea Tac from $11.80 to $13.24 was too much. Roger Lubovich explained that the rate includes recycling. Connie Epperly added that Kent citizens used to pay for recycling. Public Works Conservation Specialist Robyn Bartelt said the current rate for City of Kent garbage customers does not include recycling. The City has picked the cost up as part of the Garbage Utility Tax. The actual fee that the City reimbursed to Kent Disposal for 90 gallon recycle containers was over$4.00 and the new rates include recycling for a cost of$2.26 difference, Public Works Committee, 12/11/00 Page 4 which is less than the cost the City was reimbursing for recycling. The size of the container will reflect a different increase. One can is increased$2.26 under the new proposed fee,but the 60 gallon recycling unit is increased only $0.77. If residents go to a smaller container and do more recycling, that will impact their fee. The City has been subsidizing the cost of recycling since its inception and because it has escalated, the fund is depleted and the City can no longer afford to pay the subsidy. It costs the City $23,000 a month for recycling. Tim Clark asked if that meant the utility income no longer existed or simply did not match the cost. Don Wickstrom said it didn't match the cost which would double January 1, 2001 when the Meridian Annexation was added to the existing hauling contract. Meridian Valley currently has about 4,560 recycling customers which is almost equal to what the City presently recycles, and City customers will double from 5,000 to 10,000 on January 1, 2001. Yard waste costs actually went down for existing Kent customers. Tim Clark asked if Kent's rates were comparable to neighboring cities' rates. Robyn Bartelt said they were. Rico Yingling asked for information on the Solid Waste Management Plan that requires the City to have a waste stream reduction to 65%by 2000. Robyn Bartelt said the City was right around 65% if not over. When the solid waste code was revised to prohibit yard waste from being disposed of as garbage, that reduced the amount of solid waste. Rico Yingling questioned if the 10 year contract would allow an annual CPI rate increase for the garbage haulers without any proof of need or change in the operating costs. Roger Lubovich said the contract was drafted to provide an annual CPI increase to deal with annual increases over time and also provides a provision for the haulers to petition the City for unusual costs. Mr. Yingling said his preference would be to limit the increase to 50% of CPI unless a need is shown for more than that. Robyn Bartelt clarified that the CPI increase is only on the service level portion of the rate and not the total disposal rate. Tim Clark agreed that the CPI automatic increase should be limited since the haulers already are able to pass on their extraordinary costs. Roger Lubovich said the issue would have to be negotiated with the haulers, and a mechanism for an annual review established which would require extra resources. Mr. Yingling suggested the haulers should have to make a request with proof of need as opposed to an automatic increase each year on January 1"to match the CPI percentage. When Mr. Lubovich expressed the possibility the haulers could actually get higher adjustments because they might prove costs beyond the CPI, Mr. Yingling suggested the contract limit the maximum increase to the CPI. Tim Clark was concerned that Kent's customers should get very specific service in the events of winter storms and snow. Robyn Bartelt said the new contract had specific language to deal with bad weather situations. The garbage haulers would have to contact the radio stations to let citizens know if there were any pickup changes. Rico Yingling asked if there was any measure for overall performance and quality of service, and suggested any rate increases could be tied into a performance review. He asked if there was any tracking for complaints coming into the system. Robyn Bartelt said the haulers do tracking on a monthly basis for tonnage, the number of customers, the number of complaints,what the complaints were, and what the responses were. Public Works Committee, 12/11/00 Page 5 Ms. Bartelt mentioned that, starting early next year, a King County Wastemobile site would be located once a month at the Fred Meyer store at 240t' and Benson Highway. Residents would be able to take their household hazardous wastes there for disposal. The meeting adjourned at 5:50 PM. Jackie Bicknell City Council Secretary 4 CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS A. EXECUTIVE SESSION