The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCity Council Meeting - Council - Agenda - 07/06/1999 , �of Kent C it Councmil Meetin a x ; 9 Agenda CITY OF A Mayor Jim White Counci/members Leona Orr, President Sandy Amodt Connie Epperly Tom Brotherton Judy Woods Tim Clark Rico Yingling July 6, 1999 Office of the City Cie* CITY OF SUMMARY AGENDA KENT CITY COUNCIL MEETING VTIVVICTN July 6, 1999 Mayor Jim White Council Chambers 7 : 00 p .m. MAYOR: Jim White COUNCILMEMBERS : Leona Orr, President Sandy Amodt Tom Brotherton Tim Clark Connie Epperly Judy Woods Rico Yingling 1 . CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE 2 . ROLL CALL 3 . CHANGES TO AGENDA A. FROM COUNCIL, ADMINISTRATION, OR STAFF B. FROM THE PUBLIC 4 . PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS A. Introduction of Kent School District Superintendent, Dr. Barbara Grohe B. Employee of the Month 5 . PUBLIC HEARINGS A. 32nd Avenue South Street Vacation B. 40th Avenue South Street Vacation 6 . CONSENT CALENDAR A. Approval of Minutes B. Approval of Bills C.)k DWLS Impound Ordinance- 35-6 tl D. * Bicycle Helmet Ordinance-,3y165 E. Miscellaneous Grants - Accept and Appropriate F. Bereiter House Renovation Grant - Accept and Appropriate G. Street and Park Tree Species List - Approval and Authorization H. Human Services Roundtable Membership Termination - Resolution - 15415 I . Neighborhood Traffic Control Program - Resolution- /54/6 J. 272nd Corridor Interim Financing - Approval K. Riverbend Golf Complex Operational Options - Approval and Authorization L. Re-award Bid for Remote Access - Approval M. Foxhall Short Plat Subdivision - Bill of Sale N. Marina Pointe Two Condominiums - Bill of Sale O. Promenade Two Condominiums - Bill of Sale P . Village One Condominiums - Bill of Sale Q. Village Two Condominiums - Bill of Sale 7 . OTHER BUSINESS A. 125th Place SE Street Vacation B. * Council Meeting Date Change - Ordinance -31F6 6 (continued next page) E SUMMARY AGENDA CONTINUED 8 . BIDS A. Del Webb Pump Station B. 3 . 5 Million Gallon Water Tank Safety & Painting Improvements 9 . REPORTS FROM STANDING COMMITTEES AND STAFF 10 . REPORTS FROM SPECIAL COMMITTEES 11 . CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS 12 EXECUTIVE SESSION None 13 . ADJOURNMENT NOTE : A copy of the full agenda packet is available for perusal in the City Clerk' s Office and the Kent Library. An explanation of the agenda format is given on the back of this page . Any person requiring a disability accommodation should contact the City Clerk' s Office in advance at (253) 856-5725 . For TDD relay service call the Washington Telecommunications Relay Service at 1-800-833-6388 . CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS WELCOME: The Kent City Council meets on the first and third Tuesday of each month except December at 7:00 p.m. In _ December, the Kent City Council meets on the second Tuesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. The public is welcome and encouraged to participate in the meeting. Meetings are televised on local cable television either live or tape delayed. The following is a guide to insure that your participation is effective and timely. 1. CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. ROLL CALL 3. CHANGES TO THE AGENDA: When the Mayor asks for changes to the agenda from the public, please give your name and address and the subject of your concern. The Mayor, with the consent of the Council, will then determine whether or not this should be added to the agenda and whether it should be added as an Other Business item (#7) or a Continued Communications item (#11), and will call upon you at the proper time. 4. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS: Presentations, proclamations, introductions, etc. 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS: When the Mayor asks for public comment, you should rise or raise your hand. Upon being recognized, step to the lectern, give your name and address, and state the nature of your interest or concern. Please speak into the microphone on the lectern. 6. CONSENT CALENDAR: The Consent Calendar is designed to expedite the business of the City Council. These items have been previously discussed by the City Council and are considered so routine that passage is likely. All items listed are passed in a single motion. If you wish to discuss an item on the Consent Calendar, ask to have that item removed when the Mayor announces the Consent Calendar. 7. OTHER BUSINESS: Other Business items may require discussion by the City Council prior to reaching a _ decision. You will be given the opportunity to address the City Council on any item listed by following the same procedure as in Public Hearings. If there is a great deal of public input on any item, the City Council may elect to set a public hearing for a future date. 8. BIDS: This part of the agenda is for the approval and award of contracts for the purchase of equipment or construction projects. 9. REPORTS FROM STANDING COMMITTEES AND STAFF: This section is for reports from the Council President, Chair of the City Council Committees or City staff. 10. REPORTS FROM SPECIAL COMMITTEES: This section is for reports from special committees. 11. CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS: Items added to the agenda will be introduced at this time. In order to better serve the public, please limit your comments to three minutes. 12. EXECUTIVE SESSION: When necessary, the Council may recess to an Executive Session. These are closed sessions during which only certain subjects may be discussed, such as personnel matters, litigation concerns, and the sale or acquisition of property. 13. ADJOURNMENT COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS Council Committees are composed of three Councilmembers. The Committees meet regularly, and the Council is best able to address the concerns of constituents during these meetings. Recommendations are then taken to the full Council, and action is taken at a City Council meeting. The four Council Committees are Operations, Parks, Public Safety and Public Works/Planning. The Council also holds a workshop prior to each Council meeting. If you would like a schedule of Council Committee meetings, please call the Council Secretary at (253) 856-5712, the City Clerk's Office at(253) 856-5725, or Administration at (253)856-5721. 4/99 CHANGES TO THE AGENDA Citizens wishing to address the Council will, at this time, make known the subject of interest, so all may be properly heard. A) FROM COUNCIL, ADMINISTRATION, OR STAFF B) FROM THE PUBLIC PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS A) Introduction of Kent School District Superintendent, Dr. Barbara Grohe B) Employee of the Month �tii117 Kent City Council Meeting Date July 6, 1999 Category Public Hearings 1 . SUBJECT: 32ND AVENUE SOUTH STREET VACATION STV-99-4 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Resolution No. 1542 established July 6, 1999, as the public hearing date for the application by Highline Water District, to vacate a portion of 32nd Avenue South, a dedicated, unopened street, lying generally north of that street ' s intersection with South 240th Street . s4arfr =eP„ ee mme d}erg-denial is i ne l udas- in the--eeune4:11-9--Pac J teb. 3 . EXHIBITS: Staff report and map 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works and Planning Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc . ) 5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS : OPEN HEARING: PUBLIC INPUT: CLOSE HEARING: 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moved, Councilmember &�a7.�_, seconded to approve/4"sapp -Gyi@ /m&d gy the Planning Director' s recom- mendation of denial the c-tpplication to vacate a portion 32nd Avenue South, a dedicated, unopened street, lying generally north of that street' s intersection with South 240th Street . , as referenced in Resolution No. 1542 . �=z rc�.zr.P�, rr, ��ee�--��e e•� , A��e��eT--t��--g�e�a�� t� neeessai- ere}Ranee- pen eemplic�sew = `'- `'-e e nelitiens of . 'gn ^�� DISCUSSION: "LLF/J ACTION: Council Agenda �� o .G� •.. Item No. 5A C)TY OF ,�y ,Jim White, Mayor Planning Department (253) 856-5454/FAX (253) 856-6454 James P. Harris, Planning Director PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM July 6, 1999 MEMO TO: MAYOR JIM WHITE AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: JAMES P. HARRIS, PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON AN APPLICATION TO VACATE A PORTION OF '2"" AVENUE SOUTH — STV-99-4 RECONENIENDATION: DENIAL I. Name of Applicant Highline Water District P.O. Box 3867 Kent, WA 98032-3867 (206) 824-3867 II. Reason for Requesting Vacation The applicant states, "This request to vacate the 30 foot wide 32"d Ave. S. will eliminate a substandard width in an unimproved right-of-way, which is at the present time a refuge for illegal action. The vacation will reunite properties with common ownership and provide for future improvements." III. Background The north end of 32"d Avenue South, adjacent to the southbound on-ramp to I-5, was vacated by the City Council on September 15, 1998. r. 220 4th AVE.SO.. /KENT, %k'ASH[NGTON 9S0,2-i59j/TELEPHONE (1_53)856-5200 PROPOSED STREET VACATION STV 99-4 - 0 a� i SOUTH PART OF 32 AVE. S. f .-Aso•-.... � - n, - - ! - 4 AREA TO BE VACATED \ D c O .C . . /,:. ANT � •,r ors .,. C-4) o i 1 w•-Q--------------- M. p co � e 1aoo-oho - ----------------------------- -- - ¢ i / ... ...- ,.. CC) fa SOUTH 240TH STREET !l FEM Kent City Council Meeting Date July 6, 1999 Category Public Hearings 1 . SUBJECT: 40TH AVENUE SOUTH STREET VACATION STV-99-3 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Resolution No. 1540 established July 6, 1999, as the public hearing date for the application by Kentview L.L.C. to vacate a portion of 40th Avenue South, a dedicated street lying generally south of that street ' s intersection with 37th Place South and 40th Place South. --- 3 . EXHIBITS: Staff report and map 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works and Planning Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc . ) 5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS : OPEN HEARING: PUBLIC INPUT: CLOSE HEARING: 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember move, Councilmember ,L'3 � f1E ,,seconded to approve/ the Planning Director' s recom- mendation to approve with conditions the application to vacate a portion of 40th Avenue South, a dedicated, open street lying generally south of that street ' s intersection with 37th Place South and 40th Place South, as referenced in Resolution No. 1540; and to direct the City Attorney to prepare the necessary ordinance upon compliance with the conditions of approval . DISCUSSION: ACTION:-1 _l�l��l•G�� Council Agenda Item No. 5B �� CITY OF zL� �. i Jim White, Mayor t NV ICTA Planning Department (253) 856-5454/FAX(253) 856-6454 James P. Harris, Planning Director PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM July 6, 1999 MEMO TO: MAYOR JIM WHITE AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: JAMES P. HARRIS, PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON AN APPLICATION TO VACATE A PORTION OF 40'h AVENUE SOUTH— STV-99-3 RECOMMENDATION: APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS I. Name of Applicant Kentview L.L.C. 4030 Lake Washington Blvd., #201 Kirkland, WA 98033 (425)-822-7700 II. Reason for Requesting Vacation The applicant states, "Vacation of Kent ROW as shown on approved Kentview MPLD plans and as discussed in MDNS." NOTE: Condition 5, b of the Mitigated Declaration of Nonsignificance for the Kentview P.U.D (ENV-98-8) states, "40'h Avenue South shall extend southerly from the intersection with 37' Place South/40`' Place South and shall terminate within a new cul-de-sac constructed entirely within the Owner/Developer's property identified as Neighborhood Land Use D and E, but this street and cul-de-sac shall not be used to provide street-access to the P.U.D. The Owner/Developer of this development shall petition the City of Kent for the vacation of the remainder of the exiting public right-of-way for 40' Avenue South." III. Background The Kentview Planned Unit Development (P.U.D.) was approved by the City Council on October 6, 1998. The MDNS was approved on July 21, 1998. 220 4th AVE.So- /KENT.WASHINGTON 98032-5895/TELEPHONE (253)856-5200 MEMO TO: Mayor Jim White and City Council Members SUBJECT: STV-99-3 Portion of 40' Avenue S. DATE: July 6, 1999 PAGE: 2 IV. Staff Recommendation After reviewing comments from the following departments and agencies: • Public Works • Police • Fire • Puget Sound Energy • Parks • King County Transit Division and conducting our own review, the Planning Department recommends that the request to vacate a portion of 40T" Avenue South as mentioned in Resolution 1540 and shown on the accompanying map, be Approved with the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall deed to the City the necessary right-of-way for a cul-de-sac turnaround located at the southerly terminus of the remaining portion of 40'Avenue South. 2. The applicant shall construct said cul-de-sac turnaround to City standards including pavement, curb, gutter, cement concrete sidewalk, street lighting and drainage system. 3. The applicant shall compensate the City for the value of the right-of-way in accordance with State Law and City Code. Said cul-de-sac shall be based on the net area of property exchanged (net area vacated area-cul-de-sac right-of-way) Any monies received will go into the City's School Pedestrian Walkway fund (R36). JPHJmjp:P:\MIS STAFF RPTS\stv993rpt.doc Enclosures cc: Fred S. Satterstrom, Planning Manager PROPOSED STREET VACATIONS -ATV 99 40TH AVENUE SOUTH l '` NAREA TO BE VACATEDmom 1 7.M7 n m am m I=0 go Nor" � 1 13 f I _d -77 d x 0 o co :o I........_..... cl �- _ O Q �y CD -� I 'sue Q 1 � .�pe 1 7�—j _.. o ' . ......................L: nun.. u nn.innu nu...n�sl•. CONSENT CALENDAR 6 . City Council Action: Councilmember A2- moveW, Councilmember lr� secondedthat Consent Calendar Items A through Q� be approved. �cvttf,xli� � Discussion Action -77M 6A. Approval of Minutes . Approval of the minutes of the regular Council meeting of June 15, 1999 . 6B. Approval of Bills. Approval of payment of the bills received through June 15 and paid on June 15, 1999, after auditing by the Operations Committee on June 15, 1999 . Approval of checks issued for vouchers : Date Check Numbers Amount 6/15/99 218590-218796 $2 , 326, 884 . 35 6/15/99 218797-219427 1 , 878 , 600 . 42 $4 , 205, 484 . 77 Approval of checks issued for payroll for May 16 through May 31, and paid on June 4, 1999 : Date Check Numbers Amount 6/4/99 Checks 236037-236390 $ 268, 584 .44 6/4/99 Advices 80475-81114 806 , 156 . 51 $1, 074, 740 . 95 Approval of checks issued for payroll for June 1 through June 15, and paid on June 15, 1999 : Date Check Numbers Amount -- 6/18/99 Checks 236391-236734 $ 276, 167 . 15 6/18/99 Advices 81115-81690 836, 218 .44 $1, 112 , 385 . 59 Council Agenda Item No. 6 A-B Kent, Washington June 15, 1999 Regular meeting of the Kent City Council was called to order at 7 : 00 p.m. by Mayor White. Present : Councilmembers Amodt, Brotherton, Clark, Epperly, Orr, Woods, and Yingling, Operations Director/Chief of Staff McFall, City Attorney Lubovich, Planning Director Harris, Public Works Director Wickstrom, Police Chief Crawford, Fire Chief Angelo, and Parks Director Hodgson. Approximately 35 people were at the meeting. CHANGES TO At McFall ' s request, Other Business Item 7A THE AGENDA regarding Seasonal No Parking Zones near Lake Meridian Park was added to the agenda, as well as an executive session regarding property acquisition. PUBLIC Bicycle Safety Rodeo. Mayor White commended COMMUNICATIONS Councilmember Epperly and volunteers from the Police Department, Fire Department and Regional Justice Center for their efforts. Epperly noted that there was an excellent turn-out and ex- pressed hope that this will become a yearly event. She commended Police Chief Crawford and Fire Chief Angelo for the efforts of their staff, and noted that the unions donated the helmets . Creative Art Space. Janet Hasselblad, Program Coordinator for Specialized Recreation, noted that the artwork in the City Hall Lobby is called "Faces of Color, " and explained that they have collaborated with Very Special Arts Washington and Highline Community College in providing the program. She introduced the artists and instructors who were in attendance and invited anyone who is interested in participating to contact her at the Resource Center. Soroptimist Presentation. Judy Dreis of Soroptimist International noted that Soroptimist International of Kent is celebrating 35 years of service to the community, and presented Family Violence Prosecutor Rhonda Giger with a check in the amount of $1, 500 for use in the family violence voucher program. Ms . Giger explained that the funds will be used for short-term emergency assistance. She noted for Yingling that they partner with local hotels . 1 Kent City Council Minutes June 15, 1999 PUBLIC Flag Day... Mayor White read a proclamation noting COMMUNICATIONS that Flag Day celebrates our nation' s symbol of unity and our country' s devotion to freedom and proclaimed June 14 as Flag Day and the week of June 14 as National Flag Week in the City of Kent . Recreation and Parks Month. Mayor White read a proclamation regarding Recreation and Parks Month and urging citizens to join in bringing recog- nition to all the benefits derived from quality public and private recreation and park resources at the local level . He presented the proclama- tion to Parks Director Hodgson. CONSENT ORR MOVED that Consent calendar Items A through CALENDAR I be approved. Woods seconded and the motion carried. MINUTES (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 6A) Approval of Minutes . APPROVAL of the minutes of the regular Council meeting of June 1, 1999 . STREET (PUBLIC HEARINGS - ITEM 5A) VACATION South 125th Place Street Vacation STV-99-1. Resolution No. 1538 established June 15 , 1999, as the public hearing date for the application by Donna Young to vacate a portion of 125th Place SE, a dedicated unopened street, lying immedi- ately north of SE 270th Street . A staff report recommends approval with conditions . Planning Director Harris showed the location of the street vacation and noted that staff recom- mends that the City be compensated for the value of the 125th Place SE right-of-way and that any money received be deposited in the City' s School Pedestrian Walkway Fund. Upon Clark' s question, Harris noted that the office and professional area to the east will not be impacted. Wickstrom explained for Brotherton that there is _ no bearing on the purchase' of the adjacent easement . Wickstrom added that if the vacation is approved, he would like a second condition 2 Kent City Council Minutes June 15, 1999 STREET retaining an easement over the northerly 50 ' of VACATION the proposed vacated property plus a utility easement and a temporary construction easement . Mayor White opened the public hearing. Donna Young, 12524 SE 270 Street, stated that she will lose the majority of her background and the playground due to construction. She explained that she is a licensed day care provider and that the State requires large play equipment and 75 ' of outside space per child. She said the con- struction has caused a decrease in clientele and noted that 1/3 of her annual income is generated during the summer months . She said she does not need the sewer, and that she is requesting the street vacation because she cannot afford the fees or the disruption to her business. Young said that according to Section 2 Item 2 of Ordinance No. 2333 , Class C vacations may require compensation at one-half the appraised value, not that they must . She added that, according to the City, 125th Place SE will never be a right-of- way. She urged the Council to vacate the western half of 125th Place SE. There were no further comments and ORR MOVED to close the public hearing. Woods seconded and the motion carried. CIARK MOVED to approve the Planning Director ' s recommendation to approve with conditions the application to vacate a portion of 125th Place SE, a dedicated, unopened street, lying immedi- ately north of SE 270th Street, as referenced in Resolution No. 1538, and to amend the recommenda- tion by reserving a 20 ' easement on the northern part of the property, plus an additional 30 ' temporary easement on the north part of the parcel, and to direct the City Attorney to pre- pare the necessary ordinance upon compliance with the conditions of approval . Brotherton seconded. Wickstrom noted for Epperly that the value of Young' s property is approximately $11, 000 . 00 . 3 Kent City Council Minutes June 15, 1999 STREET Upon Yingling ' s question, Wickstrom explained VACATION that the City puts the funds from vacations in the Pedestrian Walkway Programs around schools . Lubovich explained that the City traditionally has charged one-half of the appraised value . Amodt said this project has apparently caused Ms . Young undue financial stress and that the Council should consider not charging for this property. She said the City has put no money into the property and the property owner has been maintaining it . Lubovich pointed out that the City has reached a negotiated agreement to compensate for the acquisition of the easements and the inconvenience. Clark added that a significant amount of staff time has been spent on this property, and that a sincere effort has been made to ease the inconvenience . Amodt noted that Ms . Young is being burdened with a $10, 000 LID cost and that an additional cost could harm her. She urged the Council to consider the — welfare of citizens and do this as good will . McFall pointed out that the applicant was not compelled to request the vacation, and that when property is disposed of, it is typically sold. Orr said she is unclear whether the City has put money into this property, and would not want to set a precedent whereby City-owned property is given away. She said it is unreasonable for property owners to ask to be given a piece of City property to enhance their own property and said that has not been done in the past . She ex- pressed concern about setting a precedent . Woods agreed with Orr,' noting that it is a bit like making a gift of public money. Orr added that there is the potential of the property being sold in the future. Brotherton sympathized with Ms . Young, but said it is unreasonable to give the property away. He suggested giving Ms . Young credit for the inconvenience to her business, since the pro- perty is of no value to anyone else, and charging an amount such as $2, 000 for the property. Mayor White clarified that negotiating and setting 4 Kent City Council Minutes June 15, 1999 STREET dollar amounts is a staff responsibility, and VACATION offered to work on a compensation package if so desired. AMODT MOVED to amend the motion to charge the applicant by going through negotia- tions and determining what is acceptable to the applicant and the City for the vacation. Brotherton seconded. Woods spoke in opposition to the motion. She suggested that staff provide details and that the issue be brought back to the next Council meeting. Orr agreed. Clark con- curred and reiterated that this issue has been under extensive negotiations . He then WITHDREW HIS MOTION. ORR MOVED to table this item until the next Council meeting. Woods seconded and the motion carried. Mayor White reminded Council that a precedent of charging 50% of the appraised value has been set over the years, and if Council chooses to deviate from that, the door will be open for a public negotiation of public right-of- way on every street vacation. TRAFFIC (OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 7A) CONTROL (ADDED ITEM) Seasonal No Parking Zone In The Neighborhood East Of Lake Meridian. The neighborhood east of Lake Meridian Park has experienced a number of pro- blems related to on-street parking. Residents have found cars and boat trailers on their property and blocking their driveways, litter and other trash discarded on their yards and on the neighborhood streets, and trespassers have used their yards to access the lake . These streets have also become so congested that safe passage by emergency vehicles has been threatened. These problems occur during the warmer days of the year, when use of the park is at its peak. This ordinance would prohibit parking between 12 : 00 p.m. and 8 : 00 p.m. from May 15th to September 15th of each year. Because of the threat regarding the access of emergency vehicles over the Fourth of July weekend, this item is presented as an emergency ordinance. The City Attorney noted that an emergency ordinance requires a majority plus one for passage . Upon 5 Kent City Council Minutes June 15, 1999 TRAFFIC Amodt ' s question, Lubovich said the Public Works CONTROL Committee felt this option is the most feasible. CLARK MOVED to adopt Ordinance No. 3463 prohibit- ing on-street parking on certain designated streets in the Lake Meridian area from May 15th to September 15th of each year. Epperly seconded and the motion carried unanimously. LID (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 6G) LID Position and Budget Chancre. APPROVAL of a budget change of $38, 138 for the addition of an LID Billing Technician to the Customer Service division, as recommended by the Operations Committee at their June 1, 1999 meeting. Local improvement district billings have doubled with the addition of LIDS 348, 349, and 340 and this position is needed for billing and collec- tion. The position will also spend a quarter of their time assuming the miscellaneous Accounts Receivable function. The 1999 budget is primarily covered by administrative revenue of LID 340 . (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 6H) LIDS 340 & 349 Bonds. AUTHORIZATION to proceed with Dain Rauscher, Inc. for a $13 , 221, 664 bond sale for LIDs 340 and 349, as recommended by the Operations Committee at their June 1, 1999 meeting. This will be a 15-year issue for LID 340 for the 196th Street Corridor project, and a 10-year issue for LID 349 for sanitary sewers on 223rd Street . A Bond Ordinance and Purchase Contract will be back to the Operations Committee on July 6, 1999 and to Council on July 20, 1999. PUBLIC WORKS (BIDS - ITEM 8A) 1999 Asphalt Overlays. The bid opening for this project was held on June 9th with three bids received. The apparent low bid was submitted by M.A. Segale in the amount of $558, 287 .25 . The Engineer' s estimate was $582 , 741 .25 . The Public 6 Kent City Council Minutes June 15 , 1999 PUBLIC WORKS Works Director recommends awarding this contract to M.A. Segale. CLARK MOVED that the 1999 Asphalt overlays con- tract be awarded to M.A. Segale in the amount of $558, 287 .25 . Orr seconded and the motion carried. (BIDS - ITEM 8B) 140th Avenue SE & SE 260th Street - Pedestrian Walkway. The bid opening for this project was held on June 9th with six bids received. The apparent low bid was submitted by Campbell Construction Company in the amount of $239, 010 .49. The Engineer' s estimate was $237, 399 . 33 . The Public Works Director recom- mends awarding this contract to Campbell Construction Company. CLARK MOVED that the 140th Avenue SE & SE 260th Street Pedestrian Walkway contract be awarded to Campbell Construction Company in the amount of $239, 010 .49 . Woods seconded and the motion carried. ANNEXATION (PUBLIC HEARINGS - ITEM 5B) Horseshoe Acres Annexation. This date has been set for the hearing on the proposed Horseshoe Acres Annexation. The City has received a sufficient and valid property owner petition on the proposed Horseshoe Acres Annexation, and the King County Boundary Review Board approved the annexation proposal on May 7, 1999 . This annexation contains approximately 63 acres and is located south of Kent and lies between the Green River and the Burlington Northern-Santa Fe Railroad and between South 259th Street and the Green River. The proposed ordinance would annex the Horseshoe Acres area effective July 1, 1999 . Mayor White opened the public hearing. There were no comments from the audience and ORR MOVED to close the public hearing. Woods seconded and the motion carried. 7 Kent City Council Minutes June 15, 1999 ANNEXATION CLARK MOVED to adopt Ordinance No. 3462 annexing the Horseshoe Acres Annexation area effective July 1, 1999 . Yingling seconded and the motion carried. ELECTIONS (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 6F) Election Information & Ballot Measures Policy. ADOPTION of Resolution No. 1544 , relating to providing election information through the City' s government access channel for City Council and Mayor ballot positions, as well as for ballot measures . This Resolution provides an opportuni- ty for primary and general election candidates, as well as proponents and opponents on City ballot measures, to videotape a four (4) minute presentation for broadcast as part of a single election program on the City' s government access channel . The program will then be broadcast daily for one month prior to each election. DONATIONS (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 6I) Soroptimist Donation To Family Violence Unit. ACCEPTANCE of a charitable contribution in the amount of $1, 500 from Soroptimist International of Kent for the Family Violence Emergency Assistance Fund. FIRE (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 6C) DEPARTMENT Trauma EQui=ent Grant Money. ACCEPTANCE of a $1, 200 grant from the State of Washington "trauma care system. " Upon acceptance of these funds, the Fire Department is authorized to apply the funds toward the purchase of nine (9) backboards. POLICE (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 6D) DEPARTMENT COPS Universal Officers Grant Funding & City Share Obligation. ACCEPTANCE of $150, 000 grant funding for two additional COPS Universal officers and approval to obligate the City of Kent for it ' s share of the funding in the amount of approximately $364, 576 through the year 2002 . The City of Kent is then required to retain the positions . 8 Kent City Council Minutes June 15, 1999 POLICE The COPS grant funds $75 , 000 toward each DEPARTMENT officer' s base salary and benefits only. All other costs would be City obligated funding. COURT (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 6E) Probation Officer Position. AUTHORIZATION to create a third regular, full-time probation officer position in the Probation Department of the Court, and to amend the 1999 Budget to reflect this added position. Due to case loads in the Municipal Court the Probation department has been operating with two regular, full-time positions and one temporary position which has been working full time. The caseload is not diminishing. PARKS & (BIDS - ITEM 8C) RECREATION Salt Air Vista Park Development. Bids on the Salt Air Vista Park Renovation project were opened on June 9th. The project is designed to provide handicap access, concrete sidewalks, curbs, seat wall, fencing, irrigation, and plaza area. The Engineer' s estimate for the project was $121, 030 . 28 . Parks Director Hodgson noted that five bids were received, and the low bid was submitted by BBWT Construction in the amount of $125, 350 . 10 . WOODS MOVED that the Salt Air Vista Park Renovation project be awarded to BBWT Construction, in the amount of $125, 350 . 10 plus Washington State Sales Tax. Epperly seconded and the motion carried. FINANCE (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 6B) Approval of Bills. APPROVAL of payment of the bills received through May 28 and paid on May 28, 1999, after auditing by the Operations Committee on June 1, 1999 . Approval of checks issued for vouchers : Date Check Numbers Amount 5/28/99 217714-218147 $2, 280, 179. 10 5/28/99 218148-218589 2 , 409, 889 . 05 $4, 690, 068 . 15 9 Kent City Council Minutes June 15, 1999 REPORTS Operations Committee. Woods noted that the Committee will meet at 3 :30 p.m. on July 6 . Public Safety Committee. Epperly noted that the Committee will meet at 5 : 00 p.m. on June 22 , and that they will discuss a mandatory bike helmet ordinance. Public Works & Planning Committee. Clark said that there will probably be only one Committee meeting in July, on the 19th. EXECUTIVE At 7 : 55 p.m. McFall reminded the Council of an SESSION executive session to discuss property acquisition for approximately 15 minutes . ADJOURNMENT The meeting reconvened and adjourned at 8 : 10 p.m. Brenda Jaco a CMC City Clerk 10 Kent City Council Meeting Date July 6, 1999 Category Consent Calendar 1 . SUBJECT: DWLS IMPOUND ORDINANCE 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Adoption of Ordinance No. 3q(.4 which repeals the City of Kent ' s existing ordinance and creates a new comprehensive ordinance relating to the towing of vehicles . This ordinance will also permit police officers to order the impound of vehicles driven by persons who have a suspended or revoked license. The vehicle would be held for a period of time depending upon the number of prior similar offenses that the driver has committed. In general, a person will be able to redeem their vehicle from the tow company only after he or she obtains a valid driver' s license and pays towing and storage fees . 3 . EXHIBITS: Ordinance 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Safety Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS : 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 6C ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, repealing Chapter 9.39 of the Kent City Code in its entirety and enacting a new Chapter 9.39 entitled "Towing" relating to the towing of vehicles including those vehicles driven by persons with suspended licenses. WHEREAS, the sections of Chapter 9.39 of the Kent City Code as currently enacted are adopted in Chapter 9.36 of the code, and are therefore repetitive and unnecessary; and WHEREAS, the City Council adopts the State Legislative findings set forth in the Washington Laws of 1998, Chapter 203, Section 1 relating to the effects of drivers who drive while their license is suspended or revoked; and WHEREAS, approximately forty percent(40%) of the criminal cases filed each year in the Kent Municipal Court involve persons driving with a suspended or revoked license; and WHEREAS, the impoundment of a vehicle is a civil action against the vehicle (in rem) in order to remove it from public highways; and 1 Towing/Impoundment WHEREAS, the impoundment of vehicles driven by persons who have suspended or revoked license will protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the public; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Chapter 9.39 of the Kent City Code entitled "Towing" i hereby repealed in its entirety. SECTION 2. A new chapter, Chapter 9.39, entitled "Towing" is hereby added to the Kent City Code as follows: CHAPTER 9.39. TOWING Sec. 9.39.010. Title and purpose. .This chapter shall be known and cited as the towing ordinance and shall supplement Chapter 46.55 RCW which is currently adopted in Kent City Code 9.36.010 (Model Traffic Ordinance). In the event that a conflict exists between the provisions of this Chapter and Chapter 46.55 RCW, this Chapter shall prevail. Sec. 9.39.020. Removal by police officer. In addition to the provisions of RCW 46.55.113, a police officer may take custody of a vehicle and provide for its prompt removal to a place of safety whenever a police officer finds a vehicle standing or parked in violation of RCW 46.61.570. Sec. 9.39.030. Impoundment of vehicles when driver arrested for violation of driving while license suspended or revoked or operation of motor vehicle under other License While Suspended. A. Impoundment of vehicles authorized. 1. Whenever the driver of a vehicle is arrested for a violation of driving while license suspended or revoked(RCW 46.20.342)or operation of motor vehicle under other license or permit prohibited while license is suspended or revoked (RCW 46.20.420), as 2 Towing/Impoundment these provisions are currently enacted or hereafter amended, the vehicle is subject t impoundment at the direction of a law enforcement officer. 2. It shall be the responsibility of the owner or other person lawfully charge with possession of a vehicle to ensure that any person driving such vehicle has a valid license. It shall not be a defense to impoundment or to the payment of any of the costs o impound that the owner or other person lawfully charged with the vehicle was not away that the driver's license was suspended, revoked, or otherwise invalid. B. Impoundment Periods. 1. If a vehicle is impounded because the driver is arrested for a violation o RCW 46.20.342(1)(c) (driving while license suspended or revoked in the third degree) o RCW 46 20.420, and the Washington Department of Licensing records show that the I driver has not been convicted for a violation of RCW 46.20.342 or RCW 46.20.420 or i equivalent local ordinance within the past five (5) years, the vehicle shall be redeemable immediately pursuant to subsection (B)(8). 2. If a vehicle is impounded because the driver is arrested for a violation o RCW 46.20.342(1)(c) or RCW 46.20.420 and the Washington Department of Licensing's records show that the driver has been convicted one (1) time of a violation of RCW 46.20.342 or RCW 46.20.420 or equivalent local ordinance within the past five (5)years, the vehicle shall be impounded for fifteen (15) days. 3. If a vehicle is impounded because the driver is arrested for a violation o RCW 46.20.342(1)(c) or RCW 46.20.420 and the Washington Department of Licensing's records show that the driver has been convicted two (2) or more times of a violation o RCW 46.20.342 or RCW 46.20.420 or equivalent local ordinance within the past five (5) years, the vehicle shall be impounded for thirty (30) days. 4. If a vehicle is impounded because the driver is arrested for a violation o RCW 46.20.342(1)(a) (driving while license suspended or revoked in the first degree) or RCW 46.20.342(1)(b) (driving while license suspended or revoked in the second degree) 3 Towing/Impoundment and the Washington Department of Licensing's records show that the driver has not bee convicted of a violation of RCW 46.20.342 (1) (a) or (b) or equivalent local ordinance within the past five (5) years, the vehicle shall be impounded for thirty (30) days. 5. If a vehicle is impounded because the driver is arrested for a violation o RCW 46.20.342(1)(a) or RCW 46.20.342(1)(b) and the Washington Department o Licensing's records show that the driver has been convicted of a violation of RC 46.20.342 (1) (a) or (b) or equivalent local ordinance within the past five (5) years, the vehicle shall be impounded for sixty (60) days. 6. If a vehicle is impounded because the driver is arrested for a violation o RCW 46.20.342(1)(a) or RCW 46.20.342(1)(b) and the Washington Department o Licensing's records show that the driver has been convicted of a violation of RCW 46.20.342 (1) (a) or(b)or equivalent local ordinance two (2) or more times within the past five (5) years, the vehicle shall be impounded for ninety (90) days. 7. At the conclusion of the applicable period of impoundment, if any, the registered owner, a person authorized by the registered owner, or one who has purchased the vehicle from the registered owner who produces proof of ownership or authorization and signs a receipt therefor, may redeem an impounded vehicle. A person redeeming a i vehicle impounded pursuant to this section must, prior to redemption, establish that he or she has a valid driver's license. �I 8. Prior to redeeming the impounded vehicle, any person redeeming a vehicle impounded pursuant to this section shall pay the towing contractor for the costs o impoundment, including removal, towing, and storage fees accrued during and after the applicable impoundment period. The towing contractor shall accept payment as provided in RCW 46.55.120 and other applicable statutes as currently enacted or hereafter amended. If the vehicle was impounded pursuant to this section and was being operated by the registered owner when it was impounded, it may not be released to any person until all traffic related penalties, fines, and forfeitures owed by the registered owner have been satisfied, and the registered owner establishes that he or she has a valid driver's license. 4 Towing/Impoundment 9. A vehicle impounded pursuant to this section may be searched incident t the arrest of the driver, or inventoried incident to the impound of the vehicle pursuant t the laws of the State of Washington and the United States. With the exception of persona property seized by a police officer, personal property contained within an impounde vehicle shall continue to be the responsibility of its owner, or the person driving th vehicle, and shall be dealt with pursuant to the requirements of RCW 46.55.090 and other applicable statutes as now enacted or hereafter amended. Property which is attached t the vehicle with electronic wiring, or by bolts, screws, glue, or other adhesive material, shall be considered a component of, or a part of, the vehicle for purposes of impoundment. C. Impound hearing. 1. When a vehicle is impounded pursuant to this section, the tow truck operator shall send notice to the legal and registered owners as required by RCW 46.55.110 and other applicable statutes as now enacted or hereafter amended. 2. Any person seeking to redeem a vehicle impounded pursuant to this section has a right to a hearing in the Kent Municipal Court without a jury. The purpose of this hearing is solely to contest the validity of the impoundment or the amount of removal, towing, and storage fees. A person may waive the right to a hearing and, subject to the requirements of subsection (B) herein, redeem the vehicle at the end of the applicable period. Failure to request a hearing pursuant to subsection (C) herein shall constitute a waiver of the hearing. 3. A request for a hearing must: (1) be in writing in a form approved by the Administrator of the Kent Municipal Court, (2) be signed by the person contesting the impound, and (3) be received by the Kent Municipal Court within ten(10) days of the date the notice of impoundment was mailed or given to such person pursuant to RCW 46.55.110 or RCW 46.55.120 (2)(a), whichever is later. At the time of the filing of the request for hearing, the petitioner must pay to the Court a filing fee in the amount of $39.00. 5 Towing/Impoundment 4. The hearing shall be provided as follows: a. The Court, within five (5) days after a proper request for a hearing has been received, shall set the hearing date and send notice of the date,time, and location of the hearing to the registered and legal owners of the vehicle or other item of persona property registered or titled with the Department of Licensing, the person requesting the hearing if not the owner, the tow truck operator, and the person or agency authorizing the impound. b. If the vehicle is still impounded at the time the written request is received, the Court shall set the hearing within seven (7) days of receipt of the written request. If the vehicle has been released from impound at the time the written request is received, the Court shall set the hearing within forty five (45) days. C. Any person seeking a hearing who has failed to request such hearing within the time requirements set forth in subsection (C)(3) herein may petition the Court for an extension to file a request for hearing. Such extension shall be granted only upon the demonstration of good cause as to the reason(s) the request for hearing was not _ timely filed and only in the event that notice of the auction of the vehicle has not been I published by the tow truck operator pursuant to the requirements of RCW 46.55.110, RCW 46.55.130, and other applicable statutes as now enacted or hereafter amended. For the purposes of this section, good cause shall be defined as circumstances beyond the control of the person seeking the hearing that prevented such person from filing a timely request for hearing. In the event such extension is granted, the date of granting the extension shall be treated as the date the hearing request was received. In the event that an extension is granted, additional fees resulting from the storage of the vehicle caused by the delay in the hearing shall be paid by the person requesting the extension, regardless of whether the impound is determined to be lawful or unlawful. d. If a person fails to file a request for hearing within the time periods required, and no extension to file a request has been granted, the right to a hearing is waived, the impoundment and the associated costs of impoundment are deemed to be 6 Towing/Impoundment proper, and the City shall not be liable for any charges arising from the impound. e. For the purposes of this section, any computation of time shall b in accordance with Civil Rule 6(a) of the Washington Court Rules. 5. Hearings shall, at the discretion of the Court, be held by a judge. commissioner,judge pro-tempore, or magistrate of the Kent Municipal Court, who shall determine whether the impoundment was proper and/or whether the associated removal. towing, storage, and any administrative fees were proper. The Court may not adjust fee or charges that are in compliance with the posted or contracted rates. 6. The Court may consider the criminal citation, the notice of traffic infraction. the authorization to impound created pursuant to Kent City Code Section 9.39.040, and any other written report made under penalty of perjury submitted by the impounding agency in lieu of the officer's personal appearance at the hearing. The Court may also consider an abstract of driving record and electronically printed registration information, without further evidentiary foundation. Such records shall constitute prima facie evidence of the status of the driver's or contestant's license to drive a motor vehicle, the proper period of impoundment,or the ownership of the impounded motor vehicle. The person named in the notice may subpoena witnesses, including the officer, and has the right to present evidence and examine witnesses present in court. 7. The burden of proof is upon the City to establish that the impound was proper by a preponderance of the evidence. 8. If the impoundment is found to be proper, the Court shall enter an order so stating. The Court's order shall provide that the impounded vehicle shall be released only after the applicable impound period has expired and the redemption requirements o subsections (B)(7) and (B)(8) of this section have been satisfied. The Court shall grant time payments only in the cases of extreme financial need, and only after a finding of such extreme financial need, and only where there is an assured and effective guarantee o payment. 9. If the impoundment is found to be improper,the Court shall enter an order 7 Towing/Impoundment so stating and order the immediate release of the vehicle. If the costs of impoundment have already been paid, the Court shall order the refund by the City of the costs o impoundment. If the impoundment is determined to be improper, and a filing fee was paid, the filing fee shall be returned to the payor. 10. In the event the Court finds that the impoundment was proper, but the removal, towing, storage, or administrative fees charged for impoundment were not i compliance with the posted or contracted rates, the Court shall determine the correct fees to be charged. If the costs of impoundment have been overpaid, the Court shall order refund by the City of the costs of impoundment for the amount of the overpayment. If the costs of impoundment have been overpaid, and a filing fee was paid, the filing fee shall be returned to the payor. 11. No determination of facts made at a hearing under this section shall have any collateral estoppel effect on a subsequent criminal prosecution and such determination shall not preclude litigation of those same facts in a subsequent criminal prosecution. 12. The hearing procedures set forth in this subsection shall apply only to hearings set pursuant this section. 13. The Court, in its discretion,may waive the filing fee required by subsection (C)(3) of this section upon proof by competent evidence that the person who is requesting the hearing is indigent as that term is defined in RC W 10.101.010(1). i D. Economic or personal hardship -Rental cars - Vehicle dealer or lender with perfected security interest- Exceptions. 1. The Court is authorized to release a vehicle impounded pursuant to the above section prior to the expiration of any period of impoundment upon petition of the spouse of the driver based upon economic or personal hardship to such spouse resulting from the unavailability of the vehicle and after consideration of the threat to public safety that may result from the release of the vehicle, including, but not limited to, the driver's criminal history, driving record, license status and access to the vehicle. If such release 1 8 Towing/Impoundment -` is authorized, the person redeeming the vehicle must satisfy the redemption requirement of subsection (B) of this section. The decision to release the vehicle pursuant to thi subsection shall not create any duty to protect any individual. 2. Pursuant to RCW 46.55.120, as now enacted or hereafter amended, an notwithstanding the provisions of subsection(B) of this section, a rental car business may immediately redeem a rental vehicle it owns upon payment of the costs of removal towing, and storage. 3. Pursuant to RCW 46.55.120, as now enacted or hereafter amended, an notwithstanding the provisions of subsection B of this section, a motor vehicle dealer o lender with a perfected security interest in the vehicle may immediately redeem o repossess vehicle it owns upon payment of the costs of removal, towing, and storage. E. Sale of vehicle. Any vehicle impounded pursuant to this section shall be subject to the sale provisions of RCW 46.55.130 and other applicable statutes, as now enacted o hereafter amended. i F. Authority to enforce. The Chief of Police, or his or her designee, and the Court are hereby authorized to implement such administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directives of this section. Sec. 9.39.040. Authorization to impound. When an officer authorizes the impound of a motor vehicle pursuant to this Chapter, such authorization shall state the basis for the impound, the ordinance or statute which authorizes the impound, the date, time, and place of the impound, and the officer who authorized the impound. Such authorization shall be delivered to the towing contractor within 24 hours of the impoundment. The towing contractor shall deliver the authorization to impound to the registered and legal owners of the vehicle with the other required information and within the time period required by RCW 46.55.110. 9 Towing/Impoundment SECTION - Severability. If any one or more sections, subsections, o sentences of this Ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall . not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance and the same shall remai in full force and effect. SECTION 3: - Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be i force thirty (30) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided b law. JIM WHITE, MAYOR ATTEST: BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK — APPROVED AS TO FORM: ROGER A. LUBOVICH, CITY ATTORNEY PASSED: day of , 1999. APPROVED: day of , 1999. PUBLISHED: day of , 1999. I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No. , passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the City of Kent as hereon indicated. (SEAL) BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK P\Civil\Ordinancenowing-impound.dm --'� 10 Towing/Impoundment Kent City Council Meeting C C ✓t1",f' Date July 6 , 1999 Category Consent Calendar 1 . SUBJECT: BICYCLE HELMET ORDINANCE 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Adoption of Ordinance No. 35y�5 which requires that : (1) any person riding a bicycle, or a passenger on a bicycle, wear an approved bicycle helmet; (2) the parent or guardian of a child, under the age of sixteen ensures that the child wears an approved helmet; (3) any person organizing a bicycle race or other related event include notice of the helmet requirement on promotional materials; (4) any person who is in the business of renting or leasing bicycles provide an approved helmet to those who rent or lease; and (5) any person who is in the business of selling bicycle helmets sell only helmets that meet specific safety standards . 3 . EXHIBITS: Ordinance 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Safety Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc . ) 5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember move Councilmember D.,i seconded r DISCUSSION: 0 ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 6D ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent. Washington, enacting a new Chapter 9.41 entitled "Bicycle Helmets" requiring any person riding a bicycle, including a passenger on a bicycle, to wear an approved bicycle helmet; requiring a child's guardian to ensure that the child wears an approved bicycle helmet; requiring a person who organizes bicycling events to notify participants of the helmet requirement; requiring persons leasing or renting bicycles to provide approved bicycle helmets to those who lease or rent the bicycles; and requiring those who sell bicycle helmets to sell only those helmets that meet certain safety requirements. WHEREAS, approximately nine hundred (900) people, including approximately two hundred(200) children, are killed annually in bicycle-related incidents and about sixty percent(60%) of these deaths involve a head injury; and WHEREAS, research indicates that the proper wearing of a helmet can reduce the risk of a head injury by up to eighty-five percent (85%); and WHEREAS, the number of people who ride bicycles in the United State rose twenty percent (20%) from an estimated 66.9 million riders in 1991 to 80.5 million riders in 1998; and 1 Bicycle Helmets WHEREAS, only eighteen percent (18%) of all bicycle riders in the Unite States wear a bicycle helmet all or most of the time: and WHEREAS, requiring any person riding a bicycle, including a passenge on a bicycle or in tow of a bicycle, to wear an approved bicycle helmet will protect th health, safety, and general welfare of the public; NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON. DOE HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. A new chapter, Chapter 9.41 entitled "Bicycle Helmets' shall be added to Title 9 of the Kent City Code as follows: CHAPTER 9.41 BICYCLE HELMETS Sec. 9.41.010. Purpose and policy declared. A. It is the express purpose of this chapter to provide for and to promote the health safety, and welfare of the general public and not to create. establish, or designate an particular class or group of persons who will or should be especially protected or benefited by the terms of this chapter. B. It is the specific intent of this chapter to place the obligation of complying with it terms upon any person falling within its scope. No provision of this chapter is intended to impose any duty upon the City of Kent or any of its officers, employees, or agents for any damage or injury resulting from the failure of a person to comply with this chapter. Implementation and enforcement of this chapter by the City of Kent and its officers o employees shall be discretionary and not mandatory. This chapter is not intended to form the basis for liability of the City of Kent, or any of its officers, employees, or agents in the event that a person is injured or property is damaged as a result of the failure of any person to comply with its terms. 2 Bicycle Helmets Sec. 9.41.020. Definitions. For the purposes of this chapter, the following term shall have the following meanings: A. Bicycle means every device propelled solely by human power upon which a person or persons may ride, having two tandem wheels, either of which is eight inches or more i diameter, or three wheels, any one of which is more than twenty inches in diameter. Th term "bicycle" shall include anv child-seat, trailer, side-car, or other device attached to bicycle. A device meeting the definition of a bicycle shall be considered a bicvcl notwithstanding the fact that training wheels are affixed to the device. B. Guardian means a person legally responsible for the care and management of person under the age of sixteen(16). Guardian shall include the parent, a person with lega custody, a person with temporary custody, or a person who is temporarily caring for the child. C. Child means a person under the age of sixteen (16). D. Approved bicycle helmet means a head covering designed to protect the head tha meets or exceeds safety standards adopted by the United Stated Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), the American National Standards Institute (ANSI), or the Snell Foundation. E. Public area means the public roadways, sidewalks, bicycle paths, parks, public property, public right-of-ways, and publicly-owned facilities within the city limits of the City of Kent. Sec. 9.41.030. Bicycle helmet required. A. Any person riding a bicycle, including a passenger on a bicycle or a person in to of a bicycle, upon any public area, shall wear an approved bicycle helmet and shall have either the neck or chin strap of the helmet fastened securely while the bicycle is in motion B. No person shall transport another person on a bicycle or in tow of a bicycle upon any public area, unless the passenger is wearing an approved bicycle helmet. Each person transported in violation of this subsection shall be considered a separate offense chargeable to the person in control of the bicycle. 3 Bicycle Helmets C. The guardian of a child is responsible for requiring that the child under his or he care wears an approved bicycle helmet while bicycling, or riding as a passenger on bicycle or in tow of a bicycle, in any public area, and that the child has the neck or chi strap of the helmet fastened securely. Each child not wearing an approved bicycle helme in violation of this section shall be considered a separate offense chargeable to the paren or guardian. D. It is a defense to this section for a person wearing an unapproved bicycle helme that the helmet was furnished in conjunction with his or her lease of the bicycle by a perso engaged in the business of leasing bicycles and that the helmet was fastened securely whil bicycling. Sec. 9.41.040. Bicycle races and events—Bicycle helmet required. The perso managing, organizing, or promoting a bicycle race, tour, or event shall include notice o the bicycle helmet requirement on all promotional brochures and on all registratio materials. _ Sec. 9.41.050. Bicycle on lease or loan — Bicycle helmet to be provided. A. Any person regularly engaged in the business of renting or loaning (e.g. "a tes drive") a bicycle for use in any public area shall have an approved bicycle helme available, shall offer such helmet to the person renting or borrowing the bicycle, and shal retain proof that such person was offered the use of an approved bicycle helmet. B. Each rental or lease in violation of this section shall constitute a separate offense Sec. 9.41.060. Helmet sales — Safety standards. No person who is regularly engaged in the selling of bicycle helmets shall sell or offer for sale a bicycle helmet that does not meet or exceed the safety standards approved in Section 9.41.020(D). Each sal in violation of this section shall constitute a separate offense. 4 Bicycle Helmets See. 9.41.070. Enforcement. A. Any person who violates any provision of this chapter shall have committed traffic infraction punishable by a monetary penalty in the amount of$225.00. B. In the event that a person is charged with a violation of section 9.41.030. the cour may, upon proof that the person has not been cited with a previous violation of this chapte or a similar ordinance, and upon proof that the person has obtained an approved bicycl helmet and upon presentation of a receipt therefore, may dismiss the charge. SECTION 2. — Severability. If any one or more section, subsections, o sentences of this Ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance and the same shall remai in full force and effect. i SECTION 3. — Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be i force thim (30) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided b law. JIM WHITE, MAYOR ATTEST: i BRENDA JACOBER. CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: ROGER LUBOVICH, CITY ATTORNEY 5 Bicycle Helmets PASSED: day of . 1999. APPROVED: day of 51999. PUBLISHED: day of 11999. I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No. passec by the City Council of the City of Kent. Washington. and approved by the Mayor of the City of Kent as hereon indicated. BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK 6 Bicycle Helmets UW I Kent City Council Meeting Date July 6, 1999 Category Consent Calendar 1 . SUBJECT: MISCELLANEOUS GRANTS - ACCEPT AND APPROPRIATE 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Accept and appropriate a total of $26, 735 in grants from King County, Boeing Employees, and King County Arts Commission for recreation, cultural and youth employment activities in Kent . The Recreation and Cultural Division has received a variety of grants to provide services in Kent . They include $13 , 000 from King County for youth employment programs, $7, 110 from Boeing Employees for specialized recreation uniforms and equipment, $3 , 000 for Canterbury Faire from the Kent Community Foundation, and $6, 625 from the King County Arts Commission for Kent Arts Commission activities, including summer concert series, spotlight series and Kent Kids Art Day. 3 . EXHIBITS: Copies of letters and certificates of grant awards 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Staff and Parks Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS : 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 6E U9 - Ring Count%• Ofltce of Cultural Resources Arts Commission Landmarks and Heritage Commission Ptthtic Art Commission 506,Second Avenue.Room 1115 &NMIe.WA 98104-2311 (aoc)29c-7580 March 12 1999 (Z0G)396-8G.9 FAX (206)_'9G-7580 VTDD Tracey Wickersham Kent Arts Commission 220 Fourth Avenue Kent WA 98032-5895 Dear Ms. Wickersham: 1 am pleased to inform you that King County has renewed Sustained Support Program funding in the amount of$6,625.00 for Kent Arts Commission in the second year of the 1998-1999 funding cycle. The next application for the 2000 2001 biennium will be due in early October of 1999. You will recel�,e a copy of the new application form in August 1999. As this is the second year of the two year cycle for which Kent Arts Commission was awarded Sustained Support funding no formal application is necessary. Enclosed is a request for contract intOrmation which you should complete and return to me in order to draft a contract for services to be deli%•ered to King County residents in 1999 in consideration of continued funding. Also enclosed IS an outline of public benefit requirements for all organizations that receive fundino from King County. Please complete the enclosed Contract Information Request and return to me along with the following attachments no later than April 30, 1999. 1998 (1997-1998 fiscal year) financial report for your organization Brief statement updating any significant changes in organizational status, staff or mission Enclosed On-site Evaluation Form and schedule of 1999 events Please don't hesitate to contact me if I can be of any assistance at 296-8675. On behalf of King County, thank you for your ongoing contribution to the cultural life of this region. Sincerely, Charlie Rathbun. Arts Program Coordinator enclosures ��`14' `rV � `14��1J�`IV� �`I►��`IV�`IV `I4��`I<•'��`14'� El cz i L v �Em y oa as CP%Ma L NDR r Ln I _ CLn I i B OEl E o .A: cs DR Z4 o .zt o �� Em m db�d��dbdD�bdddbdD��bdb�b��b�b��ddd�dd�d�� r ti King County Community Services Division Work Training Program Department of Community and Human Services Key Tower 700 Fifth Avenue,37th Floor Seattle,OVA 98104-5037 (206)296-5220 (206)205-6565 FAX (206)296-5242=/rDD May 11, 1999 Ms. Cheryl M. Fraser, Facilities Manager City of Kent 315 E. Meeker Kent, WA 98231 Dear . • ser: Please be informed that the King County Summer Work Training Program has agreed to partner with the City of Kent in order to provide summer project activities for low-income, Kent area teens. As discussed, the City of Kent will coordinate the Trails Corps program for 20 participants. AT this time the start date is still being negotiated, however, we will anticipate that day to be either June 28, or July 6, 1999. We have agreed that the project will last 7 weeks. King County will reimburse the City of Kent for project costs— approximately $13,000. We will issue a subcontract, ready for signature,by May 19, 1999. Thank you for your attention to this matter; don't hesitate to call if I may be of assistance. Sincerely, Linda Walsh Acting Summer Program Manager cc: Pat Lemus, Administrator, Work Training Program ATTN: Debra Wood, Administrative Assistant rat Kent Community Foundation Post OfJi-ce Box 728 • Kent, Washington 98035 • Phone 253.854.1770 • Fax 253.854.8567 Di-nr Marl;_ CIAY 21 99g Cann uratulations on receiving S3000 00 tnwards vnur V*rant request for Canterbury Faire. 1 will work with niir treas2irer a.nd let vrni knew the date when cher_ks will he issued Please feel free to contact me with any nriestions Have f-in with this extravavan7a and nlease reme.mher to provide us with your evnlnation Upon completion Sincerely. Judith 7.elt�r OWN. Kent City Council Meeting Date July 6, 1999 Category Consent Calendar 1 . SUBJECT: BEREITER HOUSE RENOVATION GRANT - ACCEPT AND APPROPRIATE 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Accept and appropriate the $25, 000 Landmarks and Heritage Grant from King County for painting and renovation of the historical Bereiter House . Parks Planning and Development staff applied for and won a $25, 000 grant from the King County Landmarks and Heritage Commission for exterior painting and restoration of the historical Bereiter House. 3 . EXHIBITS: Copy of letter of award from King County 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Staff (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc . ) 5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS : KC Landmarks and Heritage Commission Grant 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 6F King County Executive RON SIMS April 23, 1999 John Hodgson City of Kent Parks and Recreation Berieter House 220 - 4th Avenue S Kent, WA 98032 Dear Mr. Hodgson: Congratulations! I am pleased to announce that the 1999 Cultural Facilities Program awards recommended by the King County Landmarks and Heritage Commission have been approved by the King County Council. The City of Kent Parks and Recreation Berieter House will receive $25,000 for its project. King County is fortunate to have outstanding projects from the City of Kent Parks and Recreation Berieter House serving its residents with high-quality cultural programs. Through the Cultural Facilities Program, King County is pleased to be a partner in your work to expand people's opportunities to participate in the cultural life of this region. I thank you for your work to ensure that our children inherit a community where the best traditions of our past are preserved and where a creative future is within everyone's each. Sincerely, Ron Sims King County Executive RS: cc cc: Leonard Garfield, Manager, Office of Cultural Resources DING COUNTY COURTHOUSE 516 THIRD AVENUE, ROOM 400 SEATTLE. WA 98104-3271 (206) 296-4040 296-0194 FAX 296-0200 TDD E-mail: ron-sims@mea-oke.gov Xino County is an EouaI Oc^or+unity/AH+rmar,vo ate --C--I,.,,,,, RIPA� , r Kent City Council Meeting Date July 6 , 1999 Category Consent Calendar 1 . SUBJECT: STREET AND PARK TREE SPECIES LIST - APPROVAL AND AUTHORIZATION 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Adoption of the official street and park tree lists as attached and authorize the Director the Parks and Recreation Department to add or remove trees from the approved lists . The official tree planting list was adopted in March 1971 and is outdated. Staff is requesting approval to use the attached list recently developed with the assistance of Sound Urban Forestry and city staff . 3 . EXHIBITS: Tree planting list 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Parks Committee and Staff (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc . ) 5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS : 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 6G CITY OF KENT APPROVED TREE LIST Adopted by the City Council on Greencolumn Maple Acer nigrum - Height: 50' Width: 20' Shape: Upright, narrow Fall Color: Yellow to apricot orange 4'x4'Tree Pit Narrow Plantine Strip Canopies&Narrow Vehicle&Pedestrian, Underneath Minimum Pests& 3'to 4' Buildine Setbacks Site Clearance Powerlines S acin.per tree Diseases X I X I X X 20' Bloodgood Japanese Maple Acer palmutum 'Bloodgood' — Height: 18' Width: 18' Shape: Upright becoming broad, Folia e: Purple-red, Fall Color: Red 4'x4'Tree Pit Narrow Planting Strip Canopies&Narrow Vehicle&Pedestrian, Underneath Minimum Pests& 3'to 4' Huildin_Setbacks Site Clearance Powerlines Spacing per Diseases tree X X I X X X 15' Paperbark Maple Acer griseum — Height: 25' Width: 20' Shape: Upright spreading, rounded crown, Foliage: Trifoliate, dark green, Fall Color: Red 4'x4'free Pit Narrow Planting Strip Canopies&Narmw Vehicle&Pedestrian, Underneath Minimum Pests& 3'to 4' Huildin_Setbacks Site Clearance Powerlines Spacing per Diseases tree X I X X X X 20' Gerling Red Maple Acer ruhrum `Gerling' -- Height: 35' Width: 20' Shape: Pyramidal, Foliage: Green, Fall Color: Orange-red 4'x4'Tree Pit Narrow Planting Strip Cant pics&Narrow Vehicle&Pedestrian, Underneath Minimum Pests& 3'to 4' Building Setbacks Site Clearance Powerlines Spacing per Diseases tree X I X X X 25' Armstrong Maple Acer ruhrum 'Armstrong' — Height: 45' Width: 15' Shape: Narrow, fastigiate, Foliage: Light Green. Fall Color: Yellow to oran e-red 4'x4'Tree Pit Narrow Planting Strip Canopies&Narro« Vehicle&Pedestrian, Underneath Minimum Pests& 3'to 4' Building Setback, Site Clearance Powerlines Spacing per Diseases tree X X X X 20' Queen Elizabeth Maple Acer campestre 'Evelyn' — Height: 35' Width: 30' Shape: Upright branching. oval, Foliage: Dark green, Fall Color: Yellowish 4'x4'Tree Pit Narrow Planting Strip Canopies&Narrow Vehicle&Pedestrian, Underneath Minimum Pests& 3'to 4' Building Setbacks Site Clearance Powerlines Spacing per Diseases tree X X X X X 35'-40' Pyramidal Serviceberry Amelanchier canadensis `Pyramidalis' —Height: 30' Width: 12' Shape: Very upriht, Foliage: Dark green, Flowers: White clusters, Fruit: Maroon- Clu le '/4, Fall Color: Brilliant red - orange 4'x4'Tree Pit Narro%% Planting Strip Canopies&Narrow Vehicle&Pedestrian, Underneath Minimum Pests& 3'to 4' Building Setbacks Site Clearance Posserlines Spacing per Diseases tree X X I X X X 15' `Princess Diana' Serviceberry Amelanchier x grandiflora—Height: 20' Width: 15' Shaper Gracefully spreading. Foliage: Small, green, Flowers: White clusters, Fruit: Small 3/8 purple berries, Fall Color: Brilliant red 4'x4'Tree Pit Narro%% Planting Strip Canopies&Narro%% Vehicle&Pedestrian. Underneath Minimum Pests& 3'to 4' Building Setbacks Site Clearance Posserlines Spacing per Diseases tree X I X X X X 12%15' American Hornbeam C'arj inuy curoliniana— Height: 25' Width: 25' Shape: Oval, Foliage: Bri =ht een, Fall Color: Yellow 4'x4' l ree Pit Narro%% Planting Strip Canopies&Narnn% Vehicle&Pedestrian, Underneath Minimum Pests& 3'to 4' Building Setbacks Site Clearance Posserlines Spacing per Diseases tree X X X X X 30' Frans Fontaine Hornbeam Curhinus hentho 'Frans Fontaine' — Height: 30' Width: 15' Shape: Columnar. Foliage: Small crinkled green leaves, Fall Color: Yellow ` 4'0 Trec Pit Narro%% Planting Strip Canopies&Narro%% Vehicle&Pedestrian. Underneath Minimum Pests& 3'to 4' I3uild111 Sethacks Site Clearance Po%%crlincs Spacing per Diseases tree X X X X X 20' Pyramidal European Hornbeam C ar1)inus headus 'Fastigiate' — Height: 35' Width: 25' Shape: Upright oval. Fall Color: Yellm 4'x4'free Pit Narro%% Plantin_Strip Canopies&\arms% Vehicle&Pedestrian, Underneath Minimum Pests& 3'to 4' Building Sethacks Site Clearance Posserlines Spacing per Diseases tree X I X X X 25'-30' Katsura Tree C'erciclinh>,llunz jcrponicum — Height: 40' Width: 40' Shape: Upright and pyramidal when young. rounded with age. Fall Color: Yellow or a ricot orange 4'x4'free Pit Narro%% Planting Strip Canopies&Narro%% Vehicle&Pedestrian. Underneath Minimum Pests& 3'to a' Buildin_Setbacks Site Clearance Posserlines Spacing per Diseases tree X 35'-40' Aurora Dog vood cross Corms. loricla x C. liousa — Height: 25' Width: 18' Shape: Upright spreading Foliage: Green, Flower: Large white bracts that overlap, Fruit: None, Fall Color: Red 4'x4'Tree Pit Narross Planting Strip Canopies&\arross Vehicle&Pedestrian, Underneath Minimum Pests& 3'to 4' Building Setbacks Site Clearance Posserlines Spacing per Diseases tree X I X X X X 20' CITY OF KENT APPROVED TREE LIST 2 Stellar Pink Dogwood cross Corn us.floricla x C. Kousa - Height: 25' Width: 18' Shape: Upright spreading, Foliage: Green, Flower: Light pink to white, Fall Color: Red 4'x4'Tree Pit Narrow Planting Strip Canopies&Narrow Vehicle&Pedestrian, Undemeath Minimum Pests& 3'to 4' Building Setbacks Site Clearance Powerlines Spacing per Diseases tree X X X X I X 1 20' Toba Hawthorn C'rataegus x mor•clenensis `Toba' - Height: 20' Width: 20' Shape: Upright round, Foliage: Dark green, Flower: Fragrant white clusters, double, fading to ink, Fruit: Red 3/8", Fall Color: Yellow 4'x4'Tree Pit Narro« Planting Strip Canopies&Narrow Vehicle&Pedestrian, Undemeath Minimum Pests& 3'to 4' Building Setbacks Site Clearance Powerlines Spacing per Diseases tree X X X X 25' `Princeton Sentry' Hawthorn Crataegus x phaenopyrum - Height: 20' Width: 12' Shape: Upright, Foliage: Rich green, Flower: White, Fruit: Scarlet 3/8", Fall Color: Orange — scarlet. Very few thorns 4'x4'Trec Pit Narro%� Plantinu Strip Canopies&Narrow Vehicle&Pedestrian, Undemeath Minimum Pests& 3'to 4' building Setbacks Site Clearance Powerlines Spacing per Diseases tree X X X X X 15'-20' 11pright Beech Faglts .syh-atic'a 'Fastigiate' ('Dawycki')— Height: 45' Width: 15', Shape: Columnar, foliage: Dark green, ball Color: Golden brown 4'x-l" I ree Pit Narrtm Planun_Strip Canopies&Narrow Vehicle& Pedestrian, Underneath Minimum Pests& 3 to 4- building Setbacks Site Clearance Powerlincs Spacing per Diseases tree X X X X 20' Dawyck Purple Beech Fagus syl atira 'Dawycki Purple' - Height: 40' Width: 12', Shape: Columnar, Foliage: Purple, Fall Color: Brown 4 x4'Tree Pit Narro%% Plantim_Strip Canopies&Narrow Vehicle&Pedestrian, Undemeath Minimum Pests& 3'to 4 Buildin_Setbacks Site Clearance Powerlines Spacing per Diseases tree X X X X 15'-20' Raywood Ash Fraxinus oxyrarlm 'Raywood - Height: 35' Width: 25', Shape: Oval %yith dense crown, Foliage: Narrowgreen leaflets, Fall Color: Reddish purple 4"x4'Tree Pit Narrow Planting Strip Canopies&Narrow Vehicle&Pedestrian, Undemeath Minimum Pests& 3'to 4' Building Setbacks Site Clearance Powerlines Spacing per Diseases tree X X 30' Shademaster Honeylocust Gleditsia triancanthos 'Shademaster' - Height: 45' Width: 35'. Shape: Vase shaped, Foliage: Fine textured. medium green, Fall Color: Yellow 4'x4'Tree Pit Narro�% Plantin_e Strip Canopies&Narrow Vehicle&Pedestrian, Undemeath Minimum Pests& 3'to 4' Building Setbacks Site Clearance Powerlines Spacing per Diseases tree X X 40' CITY OF KENT APPROVED TREE LIST 3 Sunburst Honeylocust Gleditsia triancanthos 'Suncole' - Height: 40' Width: 35', Shape: Irregular, somewhat rectangular outline, Foliage: Bright yellow tip growth, Fall Color: Yellow-brown 4'x4'Tree Pit Narrow Planting Strip Canopies&Narrow Vehicle&Pedestrian, Underneath Minimum Pests& 3'to 4' - Building Setbacks Site Clearance Powerlines Spacing per Diseases tree X I X X X 40' Edith Bogue Magnolia Magnolia grancliflora 'Edith Bogue' - Height: 30' Width: 15', Shape: P yramidal, tight: Foliage: Dark green, glossy, Flower: Large, creamy white 4'x4'Tree Pit Narrow Plantin=Strip Canopies&Narrow Vehicle&Pedestrian, Underneath Minimum Pests& 3'to 4' Building Setbacks Site Clearance Powerlines Spacing per Diseases tree X X X X X 20' Galaxy Magnolia Magnolia 'Galaxy' - Height: 30' Width: 15', Shape: Pyramidal to oval: Foliage: Green, deciduous. Flower: Reddish u le 4'x4'Tree Pit Narrow Planting Strip Canopies&Narrow Vehicle&Pedestrian, Underneath Minimum Pests& 3'to 4' Building Setbacks She Clearance Powerlines Spacing per Diseases tree X X X X X 20' Golden Raindrops Crabapple ;1lalus lran.Ooria 'Schniidtcutleaf- Height: 20' Width: 15', Shape: Upright, vase shape. Foliage: Green, deeply cut, Flower: White, Fruit: Golden yellow. '/a", Fall Color: Yellow-tan 4'x4'Tree Pit Narrow Planting Strip Canopies&Narrow Vehicle& Pedestrian, Underneath Minimum Pests& 3'to 4' Buildin_Setbacks Site Clearance Powerlines Spacing per Diseases tree X X XI X X 20' Sentinel Crabapple Maltrs 'Sentinel' - Height: 20' Width: IT, Shape: Narrow.upright, Foliage: Dark green, glossy, Flower: Buds red, flowers single, white %vith pinkish tint, Fruit: Bright red, '/,", persistent, Fall Color: Yellow-tan 4'x4'Tree Pit Narrow Planting Strip Canopies&Narrow Vehicle& Pedestrian, Underneath Minimum Pests& 3'to 4 Building Setbacks Site Clearance Povvulines Spacing per Diseases tree X X X X X 15' Tschonoskii Crabapple Malus transitoria 'Tschonoskii' - Height: 30' Width: 14', Shape: Pyramidal, Foliage: Silvery green in spring changing to green in summer, Flower: White, single, Fruit: Greenish, sparse, I", Fall Color: Orange purple - scarlet 4'x4'Tree Pit Narrow Plantin_Strip Canopies&Narrow Vehicle&Pedestrian, Undemeath Minimum Pests& 3'to 4' Building Setbacks Site Clearance Powerlines Spacing per Diseases tree X X X X 18' American Hophornbeam Ostiya virginiana - Height: 35' Width: 25', Shape: Oval to rounded, Foliage: Medium green. Fall Color: Yellowish 4'x4'Tree Pit Narrow Planting Strip Canopies&Narrow Vehicle&Pedestrian. Underneath rt inimum Pests& 3' to 4' Building Setbacks Site Clearance Powerlines pacing per Disease ee X I X X -n- 30' CITY OF KENT APPROVED TREE LIST 4 Fraser Photinia Photinia fraseri 'Tree Form' —Height: 25' Width: 25' Shape: Maintained to any shape, shrublike, Foliage: New growth is bright red turning to green, ever reen. 4'x4'Tree Pit Narrow Plantin_e Strip Canopies&Narrow Vehicle&Pedestrian, Underneath Minimum Pests& 3'to 4' Building-Setbacks Site Clearance Powerlines Spacing per Diseases tree X X X X X 20' Krauter's Vesuvius Plum Primus cerasifera 'Krauter's Vesuvius' — Height: 20' Width: 15' Shape: Upright, Foliage: Dark purple. Flower: Light pink, Fall Color: Orange- brown 4'x4'Tree Pit Narrow Planting_Strip Canopies&Narrow Vehicle&Pedestrian. Underneath Minimum Pests& 3'to 4' Building Setbacks Site Clearance Powerlines Spacing per Diseases tree X X X X X 25' Cascade Snow Cherry Pruniis 'Berry' — Height: 25' Width: 20" Shape: Upright spreading, Foliage: Dark green, Flower: Large white single flower, Fruit: None, Fall Color: Yellowish to bronze-oran re 4'x4'Tree Pit Narrow Planting Strip Canopies&Narrow Vehicle&Pedestrian. Underneath Minimum Pests& 3'to 4' Building Setbacks Site Clearance Powerlines Spacing per Diseases tree X X X X X I 25' Capital Pea[' Pvi•ci.s ccrlletycuut 'Capital' - Height: 35' Width: 12" Shape: Columnar, Foliage: Medium green, glossy. Flower: White, Fall Color: Reddish-purple 4'x4'Tree Pit Narrow Planting Strip Canopics&Narrow- Vehicle&Pedestrian, Underneath Minimum Pests& 3'to 4' Building Setbacks Site Clearance Powerlines Spacing per Diseases tree X X X X 15' Chanticleer Pear Pp-us calleri-ana 'Glen's Form' - Height: 40' Width: 15" Shape: Upright narrowly pyramidal, Foliage: Green, glossy, Flower: White, Fall Color: Reddish 4'x4'Tree Pit Narrow Planting Strip Canopics&Narrow Vehicle&Pedestrian. Undemeath Minimum Pests& 3'to 4' Building Setbacks Site Clearance Powerlines Spacing per Diseases tree X T X X X 20' Crimson Spire Oak Ouercus 'Crimschmiclt'— Height: 45' Width: 15' Shape: Columnar, ti htly fastigiate. Foliag : Dark green to bluish-green, Fall Color: Red 4'x4'Tree Pit Narrow Planting Strip Canopies&Narrow Vehicle&Pedestrian, Underneath Minimum Pests& 3'to 4' Building Setbacks Site Clearance Powerlines Spacing per Diseases tree X X X X 18'-20' CITY OF KENT APPROVED TREE LIST 5 Red Cascade Mountain Ash Sorbus tianshanica `Dwarfcrown' - Height: 20' Width: 8" Shape: Upright oval, compact, Foliage: Lustrous green, Flower: Small white, in clusters, Fruit: Small red, in clusters, Fall Color: Yellow-orange 4'x4'Tree Pit Narrow Planting Strip Canopies&Narrow Vehicle&Pedestrian, Underneath Minimum Pests& 3'to 4' Building Setbacks Site Clearance Powerlines Spacing per Diseases tree X X X I X X 10, Fragrant Snowbell Styrax obassia - Height: 25' Width: 15" Shape. Pyramidal to upright narrow oval, Foliage: Large, deep green, Flower: White, in 6-8" drooping Clusters, Fall Color: Yellowish 4'x4'Tree Pit Narrow Planting Strip Canopies&Narrow Vehicle&Pedestrian, Underneath Minimum Pests& 3'to 4' Building Setbacks Site Clearance Powerlines Spacing per Diseases tree X X X X I X 18' Ivory Silk Japanese Tree Lilac Svringia relicideact 'Ivory Silk' - Height: 20' Width: 15" Shape: Upright spreading*, Foliage: Dark green. Flower: Creamy white panicles, Fall Color: Yellowish to brown 4'x4'free Pit Narrow Plantim_Strip Canopie,&Narrow Vehicle&Pedestrian, Underneath Minimum Pests& 3'to 4' Buildutg Setbacks Site Clearance Powerlines Spacing per Diseases tree X X X X X 20' Littleleaf Linden Tilia corclatu - Height: 50' Width: 35' Shape: conical in youth, changing to ovate, Foliage: Dark shiny green, Fall Color: Yellow-green or yellow. Flower: yellowish, pendulous clusters. very fragrant. Fruit: globuse nutlets with bracts 4'x4'Tree Pit Narrow Plantin_Strip Canopies&Narrow Vehicle&Pedestrian, Underneath Minimum Pests& 3'n,4' 13uil.lmg Setback, Site Clearance Powerlines Spacing per Diseases tree X X X X 35'40' X Zelcova Zelcora serratcr `Village Green' - Height: 40' Width: 35' Shape: Vase shaped to rounded, Foliage: Deep green, Fall Color: Rustyred 4'x4'Tree Pit Planting strip greater Canopies&Narrow Vehicle&Pedestrian, Underneath Minimum Pests& than 6'� Building Setbacks Site Clearance Powerlines Spacing per Diseases tree X X X 40' CITY OF KENT APPROVED TREE LIST Researched & Prepared by: SUF—Sou nd Urban Forestry 6 CITY OF KENT APPROVED PARK TREE LIST Adopted by the City Council on BOTANICAL NAME HEIGHT WIDTH LANDSCAPE INTEREST COMMON NAME iCATEGORY: SMALL OR NARROW SIZE TREES ,Ater circinatum 15' 15' Fa,'I Color orange 'Vine Maple to bright red IAcer palmatum 'Butterfly' 18' 8' Foliage; variegated LButtertly Japanese Maple Fall Color magenta Acerpaimatum 'Viridis' 6' 8' Fall Color; golden' Weeping Green Japanese Maple orange Acer palmatum 'Bloodgood' 18, 18' Foliage Purple-red Japanese Maple Fall Color: Red lAcer ginnale 'Flame' 20' 20' Fall Color orange ,Amur Maple to deep red Amelanchier x grandinore 'Autumn brilliance' 20' 15' Flower: white Serviceberry lFall Color, orange Amelanchier x grandi/Tora 'Cole's Select' 20' 15' Flower: white Serviceber Fall Color: bright-orange-red Ca_minus carohniana 20' 20' Fall Color: yellow to bright orange-red icon Hornbeam C,_ .is canadensts 25' 30' Flower: rosy pink !Eastern Redbud Fall Color: yellow Cornus kousa chinensis'Milky Way' 20' 15' Flower. white Kousa Dogwood Fall Color: reddish Corylus cornuta var calrfornica 25' 20' Catkins appear in early spring, !Beaked Hazelnut Fall Color yellow Fruit nut, benefits wildlife I !Comus kouss x Cornus florid&'Constel la ti on' 25' 20' Flower: white jConstellatlon Dogwood Fall Color: yellow to red !F-uit: none Cotonus coggygria 'Royal Purple' 15' 15' Foliage: purple to blacK Royal Purple Smoke Tree Flower: purple to lavender, fluffy Fall Color: yellow to oran a-red Crataegus crus-galli 25' 13' Flower: white Thornless Cockspur Hawthorn !Fall Color: orange (Fruit red, % persistent jCrataegusphaenopyrum 'Princeton Sentry' 20' 1 12' 'Flower. white (Washington Hawthorn !Fall Color: orange to scarlet !Fruit scarlet, long lasting !Halesia carolina 25' 25' Flower, white bell-shaped !Carolina Silverbell Fall Color: yellow 'Hamamelis x intermedia 'Primavera' 10' 10' Flower yellow Primavera Wltch Hazel Fall Color: yellow 'CATEGORY: SMALL OR NARROW SIZE TREES BOTANICAL NAME HEIGHT WIDTH LANDSCAPE INTEREST COMMON NAME Magnolia 'Galaxy' 20' 15' Flower: reddish purple Magnolia Hybrid Fall Color: yellow ',Magnolia kobus 'Merril Leonard Messel' 20 20 Flower deep pink 'Kobus Magnolia Malus transitoria 'Adirondack' 18' 12' Flower. white iFlowering Crabapple Fruit, red, '/2" Malus transitoria 'Golden Raindrops' 18, 20' Flower: white �Flowering Crabapple Fruit: goldenyellow; %' ',Malus transitoria 'Prairifire' 20' 8' Flower. deep pink to red 'Flows rin C rabapple Fruit: red, '/2 persistent Parotia persica 25' 17' Foliage: green, pink tinted young growth Persian Parotia Flower: small red Fall Color: orange, pink and scarlet 'Prunus cerasifera Wt St Helens' 20' 20' Foliage purple !Flowering plum Flower light pink Prunus x yeodoensis 'Akebona Daybreak' 25' 25' Foliage: bright glossy green �Flowering Cherry Flower: pink Fall Color. yellow Prunus x subhirtella 'Snow Goose' 20' 20' Flower. white 'Snow Goose Cherry I: Jucus ca.erulea 15' 12' Flower: white b ..a Elderberry Fruit blue cluster of berries 'Sassafras albidum 25 25' Flower: small yellow-green Sassafras Tree Fall Color brilliant yellow to bright orange to red iSorbus banshanica Dwarfcrown' 16' 10' Flower: small white, clusters Red Cascade Mountain Ash Fall Color, yellow-orange Fruit small, orange-red, in clusters Stewartia koreana 25' 15' Flower white with yellow center Korean Stewartia Fall Color: orange-red to red-purple Styrax/aponicus 25' 25' Flower: pure white 'Japanese Snowbell Fall Color. yellowish Synnga reticulate 'Ivory Silk' 20' 25' Flower: creamy white panicles Ivory Sllk Tree Lllac Charnaecyparis obtusa 'Aurea' 15' 10' Foliage: soft or fine textured that is tinged in yellow Golden Hinoki Falsec ress CATEGORY: MEDIUMS IZE TREES BOTANICAL NAME HEIGHT WIDTH LANDSCAPE INTEREST COMMON NAME 'Acer campestre 'Evelyn' 35' 35' Fall Color: yellowish !Queen Elizabeth Maple Acergriseum 25' 20' Exfoliating Bark Pa erbark Maple Fat Color; red 'Acer negundo 'Flamingo' 25' 20' Forage: variegated white and green with a pink tint Flamingo Box Elder Fall Color reddish tint Acer platanoides'Crimson Sentry' 25' 18' Foliage: purple Norway Maple Fall Color: maroon to reddish bronze IAcer platanoides 'Columnar' 35' 15' Fall Color: yellow 'Norway Ma le IAcer platanoides 'Crimson King' 35' 25' Fo!;age deep purple !Norway Maple Acer platanoides 'Olmsted' 35' 20' Fall Color: yellow Norway Maple Acerpsoudoplatanus'Atropurpureum' 40' 30' Foliage; deep green on top of leaf& velvety purple S aethii Maple on underside Ac—rubrum 'Bowhall' 40' 20' Fall Color yellow-orange Aa le f{ dr rubrum 'Karpick' 40' 20 Fail Color yellow to ;Red Ma le ora^ e Acer rubrum 'October Glory' 40' 35' Fa' Color, deep red to reddish-purple Red Maple .+cer truncatum x A.platanoides 'Norwegian Sunset' 35' 25' Fa!, Color. yellow-orange to red '_Shan tun H brid Ma le i Aesculus carnea 'Briotti' 35' 25' F,ower red in 10" long clusters Ruby Red Horsechestnut Aescufus hippocastanum 'Baumanni' 40' 35' Flower white in 9" i Baumann Horsechestnut clusters, double flowers & fruitless Setula laquemontir 40' 30 IFa' Cclor: yellow Jac uemontii Birch Bone white bark Carpinus betulas 35' 25' Fal Color. yellow !European Hornbeam iCarpinus betulas fastigiata 'Pyramidal Hornbeam' 35' 25' Fali Color yellow :.European Hornbeam Cercidiphyllum japonicum 35' 35' Foliage: bluish green Katsuratree Fall Color ellow to apricot Oran e Cladrastis lutea 30, 20' Flcwer: white, drooping clusters IYellowood Fall Color: yeliow CATEGORY: MEDIUM SIZE TREES BOTANICAL NAME HEIGHT WIDTH LANDSCAPE INTEREST COMMON NAME ! Corms nattallii 30' 25' Flower: white (Pacific Dogwood Fall Color: deep red to brown Fruit: red berry, benefits wildlife Fagus sylvatica 'Tricolor' 30' 18' Foliage: green, marked white and edged with pink ,Tricolor Beech IFraxinus americana 'Autumn Applause' 40' 25' Fall Color reddish-purple White Ash Fraxlnus pennsylvenia 'Urbanite' 35' 25' Foliage: deep green Green Ash Fall Color deep bronze 35' 20' Fall Color: yellow Ginkgo bdoba 'Princeton Sentry' !Ginkgo male Ginkgo biloba 'Autumn Gold' 35' 30' Fall Color. golden yellow Ginkgo male Koelreuterra paniculata 35' 35' Flower: yellow !Goldenrain Tree Fall Color: yellow Walus transitoria 'Tschonoskii' 40' 1 20' Flower: small white 1Flowering Crabapple Fruit 1", sparse Foliage: silver-green Fall Color orange, purple-scarlet 1rVyssa sylvatica ( 40` 35' Foliage: dark green, glossy (Black Gum Fall Color: bright coppery red �Oxydendron arborsum 30' 20 Flower creamy white, bell shaped Sourwood/Sorrel Tree Foliage light green, bronze tinted Fall Color. orange, scarlet Phelodendron amurense'Macho 40' 35' Fall Color yellow Macho Cork Tree 1 Pyrus calleryana 'Capital' 35' 12' Flower: white [Callery Pear Fall Color: reddish-purple I Pyrus calleryana 'Glen's Form' 40' 20' Flower white Chanticleer Pear Fall Color: reddish I Pyrus calleryana 'Aristocrat' 40' 30' Flower, white Callery Pear Fall Color deep red Chamaecyparis nootkatensis'Pen dula' 35' 15' Shape: narrow, conical Weeping Alaskan Cedar Foliage light green with wee in branches & to I IRhamnus purshiana I 35' ! 30' Foliage dark glossy green 'Cascara Sha e: oval Thuja plicata 'Hogan' 40' 12' Shape dense fastigiate Ho an Western Red Cedar �Foliage- dark green, excellent screen tree 'CATEGORY: LARGE SIZE TREES i BOTANICAL NAME HEIGHT WIDTH LANDSCAPE INTEREST COMMON NAME racer macrophyllum 55, 50' Foliage: very large leaf 'Bi leaf Maple Fall Color: yellow 'Acer rubrum ' Schlesinger' 50, 45' Fall Color: pastel Red Maple —Orange to oran a-red 'Acer saccharum 'Green Mountain' 45' 35' Fall Color: reddish-orange to red Sugar Maple 'Liquidamberstyraciffua 55' 35' Foliage, deep, glossy green iAmerican Sweet Gum Fall Color: red, purple, yellow Fruit seed bur or ball Measequoia glyptostroboides 60' 30' Foliage: deciduous conifer ':Dawn Redwood Fall Color: rusty orange Unodendron tulipefera 60' 35' Flower. yellow-green with orange center 'Tulip-tree Fall Color: yellow INothofagus antarctica 50' 35' Foliage small, dark green [Antarctic Beech Fall Color yellow ?Iatanus acenfolia 'Sloodgood' 50, 40' Exfoliating bark, cream to light green and tan ;London Plane IQuercus alba 50' 40' Fal! Color yellow I,WhJte Oak l r Is bicolor 50' 40' Fall Color yellow brown to reddish ..imp White Oak Quercus coccinea 40' 30' Fall Color. red 'Scarlet Oak IQuercus cnmschmidt 45' 15' IFoliage, dark green to bluish-green Crimsons ire Oak JF@11 Color red IQuercus garryana 55' 45' Fall Color yellow iOre on White Oak .Quercus macrocarpe 60' 50' Fall Color yellow [Bur Oak Quercus phellus 40' 35' Foliage dark green and thin, willow-like Willow Oak shape Quercus robur'Fasitigiata' 45' 15' Foliage. glossy green En Ilsh Oak Fall Color: yellow to golden brown IQuercus rubra 40' 30' Fall Color: red 'Red Oak !Sequoiadendron giganteum 70' 45' Foliage. gray-green Giant Sequoia Sequoia sempervinens 75' 50' Foliage: deep green, flat spray Coast Redwood Bark: reddish, fuzz iTsuga heterophylle 70' ( 40' IFoliage: medium green, fine texture look (Western Hemlock Tilia americana 'Boulevard' 50' 25' Fall Color. yellow 'Boulevard Linden Ulmus parvifolia x carpinifolia 'Frontier' 40' 30' [Foliage: glossy green IE! (Fall Color: burgundy CATEGORY: LARGE SIZE TREES BOTANICAL NAME HEIGHT WIDTH LANDSCAPE INTEREST COMMONNAME Ulmus parvifolia 'Dynasty Lacebark Elm' 45' 35' Bark: exfoliating, reddish ,Chinese Elm Fall Colo. deep red :Zelkova serrata 'Green Vase' 50, 40' Fall Color: orange Zelkova Thuja plicata 80, 50' Bark gray to reddish brown 'Western Red Cedar Foliage. glossy yellowish green ,Pious flexilis 'Vendewolfs Pyramid' 40' 20' Shape pyramidal Vandewolf's Pyramid Pine Foliage: blue-green needles IPicea sitchensis 80, 60' Foliage: yellowish-green or bluish-green !Sltka Spruce ICalocedrus decurrens 45' 15' Shape. narrow, stiff, columnar j Incense Cedar Foliage dark green, in fan-likesprays t 1Cedrus deodara 60' 30' Shape: open, pyramidal 0eodar Cedar Foliage soh, light green Pseudotsuga mensiesir 90' 60' Foliage yellowish-green 'Dou las-Flr lAbies amabilis 65' 45' Shape. conical, dense cylindrical f 'Pacific Silver Fir Fora e: dark shiny green above white lined below Ahies procera 90' 40' Shape: very symmetrical, conical le Fir Foliage. bluish-green and white lined underneath �Unamaecyparrs nootkatensis 60, 40' Bark. grayish-brown iAlaska-Cedar Foliage bluish-green with spreading tips_ 'Arbutus menziesii 50' 45' Flowers: white clusters, bell shape ,Pacific Madrone Fruit red berries Foliage broadleaf evergreen, glossy green bark, tan to orange �� Kent City Council Meeting Date July 6 , 1999 Category Consent Calendar 1 . SUBJECT: HUMAN SERVICES ROUNDTABLE MEMBERSHIP TERMINATION - RESOLUTION 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Adoption of Resolution No. 15 terminating Kent ' s membership in the Human Services Roundtable, as recommended by the Public Works & Planning Committee on June 21, 1999 . 3 . EXHIBITS: Memo and resolution 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works and Planning Commission (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc . ) 5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS : 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 6H CITY OF rNVICTA Jim White, Mayor Planning Department (253) 856-5454/FAX(253) 856-6454 James P.Hams,Planning Director PLANNING DEPARTMENT (253) 856-5454 STAFF REPORT July 6, 1999 TO: MAYOR WHITE AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: KATHERIN JOHNSON, HUMAN SERVICES MANAGER RE: HUMAN SERVICES ROUNDTABLE MEMBERSHIP TERMINATION RESOLUTION RECOMA ENDED ACTION --n June 21, 1999 the Public Works and Planning Committee unanimously approved the following two recommended actions: 1. Approval of Human Services Roundtable Termination of Membership Resolution. 2. Forward this recommendation to the full City Council for consideration at its July 6, 1999 meeting authorizing the Mayor to sign the Resolution. BACKGROUND The membership of the Human Services Roundtable of King County is composed of King County; Cities of Bellevue, Bothell, Des Moines, Issaquah, Kent, Kirkland, Lake Forest Park, Redmond, Renton, SeaTac, Shoreline, Seattle and Tukwila; United Way; and the Department of Social and Health Services. In the last 18 months; the Cities of Auburn and Mercer Island have resigned membership. The City of Federal Way dropped out several years ago. The City of Seattle, King County and United Way each hold two seats on the Roundtable thereby giving them each two votes. The Roundtable membership consists of elected officials representing their jurisdictions. The permanent staff is composed of staff from each jurisdiction with Seattle and King County each having two staff persons. The project staff is a consultant paid by the dues collected. Dues are calculated based on population. Kent's current fee of$10,060 which has not gone up in several years primarily due to a concern that if the dues are raised to reflect the current population, membership would drop off. Permanent staff has raised concerns that Seattle and King County dominate the Roundtable. This has become more evident with the participation of Seattle's Mayor. Staff has also expressed concerns that the suburban cities are not receiving their money's worth and that their interests are not being addressed. Other jurisdictions have indicated they may resign from the Roundtable due to the focus on Seattle. 220 4th AVE.SO., I KENT,WASHINGTON 98032-5895/TELEPHONE (253)856-5200 HUMAN SERVICES ROUNDTABLE MEMBERSHIP TERMINATION RESOLUTION STAFF REPORT 6/21/99 PAGE 2 At the 1999 Permanent Staff Retreat three areas were identified that would meet the needs of membership. There was consensus on legislative advocacy and strategies to improve cost-effective systems. There was not consensus on using a sub-regional approach to define areas of need and develop the work program around those areas. The permanent staff representing the South County jurisdictions felt a sub-regional approach was critical to the Roundtable's future. PROS AND CONS OF MEMBERSHIP Staff has identified the following pros and cons of membership in the Roundtable. Pros • Legislative Advocacy for Human Services in Olympia • Forum for elected officials to discuss Human Services • Forum to develop strategies to improve cost-effective systems Opportunities to become aware of changes in the County's delivery of human services to the region Mayor White has suggested forming a South King County Electeds Forum on Human Services instead of the Human Services Roundtable which would address these areas. City Human Service Staff are currently members of the South King County Planners Group which meets monthly to review and discuss human service issues in South King County. Cons • King County/Seattle Focus • Lack of focus on sub-regional issues • Major South County players such as Auburn and Federal Way are not at the table • Attempts by Seattle to dictate the work plan • Lack of understanding as to how jurisdictions operate • Few significant accomplishment in the past 3 years KY-pm P:Wuman Services lKATHERINWuman Services Roundtable Report Council.doc cc: James P. Harris, Planning Director RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington. authorizing the City to terminate its membership in the interlocal agreement to participate in the work plan of the Human Services Roundtable. WHEREAS, in 1988, the City agreed to participate in a cooperative, regional human services action plan and implementation schedule (also described as a Human Services Roundtable); and, WHEREAS, the City of Kent participated with other municipalities in reviewing the needs, assessments, demographic data, and human services policies to determine the highest priority human services needs in the region and to develop strategies for addressing those needs; and WHEREAS, the Kent City Council has determined to terminate its membership at this time in the Human Services Roundtable, thereby authorizing the City to provide notice of its intent to terminate its membership in the interlocal agreement with King County; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL-OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Council hereby authorizes the City of Kent to terminate its participation with other Human Services Roundtable Partners and the 1 Membership Termination Human Services Roundtable withdrawal of its membership in the 1988 Human Services Roundtable interlocal agreement with King County. SECTION 2. Severability. If any section, subsection, paragraph. sentence, clause, or phrase of this resolution is declared unconstitutional or invalid for any reason, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this resolution. SECTION 3. Effective Date. This resolution shall take effect 30 days after its passage. PASSED at a regular open public meeting by the City Council of the City of Kent. Washington, this day of , 1999. CONCURRED in by the Mayor of the City of Kent this day of 1999. JIM WHITE, MAYOR ATTEST: BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: ROGER A. LUBOVICH, CITY ATTORNEY I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of Resolution No. passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, the day of ' 1999. BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK P.\CivilVtesoluuon\roundtable.doc —�- 2 Membership Termination Human Services Roundtable Kent City Council Meeting Date July 6, 1999 Category Consent Calendar 1 . SUBJECT: NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC CONTROL PROGRAM - RESOLUTION 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works/ Planning Committee, adoption of Resolution No. /_5SL4 establishing the Neighborhood Traffic Control Program. 3 . EXHIBITS: Public Works Director memorandum and ordinance 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works/Planning Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc . ) 5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS : 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds - DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 6I MEMORANDUM April 6, 1999 TO: Public Works Co , 'ttee FROM: Don Wickstrom, u lic Works Director City of Kent SUBJECT: Neighborhood Traffic Control Program Joe Mitchell, the city's Neighborhood Traffic Control Program Manager, has completed his assessment of our current program and submitted a preliminary plan for your review. His evaluation involved extensive research into traffic-calming methods employed throughout the United States and Europe. He has reviewed all statutory requirements related to growth management as it pertains to local transportation and land use planning, and incorporated those requirements into his proposed modifications to current neighborhood traffic control program policies and practices. The proposed neighborhood traffic control policy includes the following elements. ❑ Extensive citizen involvement ❑ A focus on two problem areas: traffic volume and speeds A two phase, incremental approach to both problem areas Problem identification based on traffic engineering field studies ❑ Volume control threshold criteria that is consistent with comprehensive transportation planning policy ❑ Speed control threshold criteria that is consistent with local police enforcement practices and traffic engineering best practices ❑ Double, super-majority support levels required for traffic-calming plan implementation' ❑ Ongoing, periodic evaluation of first phase solutions ❑ Customer satisfaction surveys to assess neighborhood perceptions J Seventy percent(70%)of the residents and seventy percent(70%)of the property owners RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, enacting and adopting a "Neighborhood Traffic Control Program" to better respond to neighborhood traffic control problems. WHEREAS, various residential neighborhoods within the City of Kent continue to experience problems involving traffic volumes and traffic speeds; and WHEREAS, these traffic problems can pose a threat to the health and safety of the neighborhood residents as well as adversely impact the neighborhood's residential character; and WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Council have recognized the need to develop new and creative solutions to address these traffic problems to better respond to the needs of these communities; and WHEREAS, staff has been directed to undertake review of these neighborhood traffic problems and to research and develop solutions to more adequately address these neighborhood traffic problems; and WHEREAS, staff has completed extensive research on neighborhood traffic control programs as they have been addressed in other communities in Washington State, in the United States, and in Europe; and 1 Neighborhood Traffic Control Program WHEREAS, staff has similarly researched programs and solutions offered by major transportation and traffic institutions in the United States and Europe; and WHEREAS, as a result of this research, staff has developed a "Neighborhood Traffic Control Program" intended to address neighborhood traffic concerns as they develop in the City of Kent; and WHEREAS, the City Council has had an opportunity to review this "Neighborhood Traffic Control Program" and the public has had an opportunity to comment on the plan at the first Public Works Committee meeting in June, 1999; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. There is hereby adopted the "Neighborhood Traffic Control Program" of the City of Kent. This program was designed, with extensive citizen involvement, to focus on traffic volume and traffic speeds to the extent they negatively impact neighborhood environments. This is a phased program that will allow citizens to identify problems and solutions specific to their neighborhoods. The program will be phased in order to address the community's needs and identify the appropriate solution. If necessary, potential solutions may involve various speed control or traffic calming devices, including the construction of physical structures to reduce volumes and speeds. Finally, the program will also provide for ongoing periodic evaluation of the solutions as implemented and will also include follow-up surveys to determine the neighborhood's satisfaction with the solutions developed. SECTION 2. A copy of the "Neighborhood Traffic Control Program" is attached and incorporated herein as Exhibit "A" to this resolution. Further, the City Clerk of the City of Kent shall keep a copy of this program on file for review. 2 Neighborhood Traffic Control Program SECTION 3. - Severabilitv. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase of this resolution is declared unconstitutional or invalid for anv reason, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this resolution. Passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Kent. Washington this day of , 1999. Concurred in by the Mayor of the City of Kent, this day of 1999. JIM WHITE, MAYOR ATTEST: BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: ROGER A. LUBOVICH, CITY ATTORNEY I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Resolution No. , passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, the day of , 1999. (SEAL) BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK P:`CivdlResolution\NeighborhoodTraf cControl.doc Neighborhood Traffic Control Program NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC CONTROL PROGRAM OVERVIEW The Neighborhood Traffic Control Program is designed to support legally required statewide and local comprehensive transportation planning policies and goals. The statutory authority for our local transportation policy is found in RCW 36.70A, the state Growth Management Act. The Growth Management Act (GMA)was passed by the legislature in 1990 to address problems associated with low- density growth patterns in Washington: • people moving to the region were buying property in outlying areas where land rents and housing costs are less expensive than in the central city; • these new residents commuted, alone and by car,to work in or near the central city where the best employment opportunities were located; • with more cars on the road and inadequate transportation services in place to respond to the increase in travel demand,traffic congestion increased; • increased congestion contributed to a decline in air quality along with its attendant environmental and community health concerns. The GMA requires local governments to accommodate anticipated population growth through strategic land use planning. Each jurisdiction must produce a comprehensive plan that contains elements related to land use, transportation, capital facilities, housing and utilities. The GMA requires a direct link between transportation and land use policy in all comprehensive plans. The City Council adopted the City of Kent's Comprehensive Plan on April 18, 1995 by Ordinance 3222. The transportation element of the city's comprehensive plan contains five policies related to traffic flow on city roadways. These policies provide the framework for the Neighborhood Traffic Control Program: 1. Policy TR-4.1- Maximize traffic flow and mobility on arterial roads, especially on regional through routes, while protecting local neighborhood roads from increased traffic volumes. 2. Policy TR-4.2- Provide a balance between protecting neighborhoods from increased traffic and reducing accessibility for the citywide road network. 3. Policy TR-4.3- Balance the dual goals of providing accessibility within the local street system and protecting neighborhoods. Where overflow traffic from the regional system significantly impacts neighborhoods,protect the residential area. 4. Policy TR-4.4- Develop a system of level-of-service standards which promote growth where appropriate and preserve the transportation system where appropriate. 5. Policy TR-4.8-Enhance the Neighborhood Traffic Safety Program to include in neighborhoods a wide range of passive control devices. Level of Service Standards and Neighborhood Traffic Control The Growth Management Act requires local jurisdictions to include action plans for bringing existing transportation facilities into compliance with established level-of-service (LOS)' standards. The comprehensive plan must provide for the expansion of transportation facilities to meet future need at established LOS standards. Land use planning must be consistent with the transportation action plan; future growth shouldn't cause transportation facilities to fall below established LOS standards. LOS standards can be based on many measures, including traffic congestion. LOS standards for traffic congestion have been developed and revised over the years by the Transportation Research Board(TRB). One of the TRB systems uses volume on a road and capacity of the road to define a ratio, called a V/C (volume to capacity) ratio, which can be classified by degree of congestion. The classifications" range from A (the best) to F (the worst). Roads with lower levels of congestion are given higher level of service designations. Roads with higher levels of congestion are given lower level of service designations. The LOS standards developed for Kent are based on volume to capacity ratios that are consistent with those developed for the King County region. There are separate standards for different transportation modes, including nonmotorized modes. This is in keeping with the adopted commute trip reduction ordinance, air quality legislation, and policies that support single occupancy vehicle reductions. For the purposes of this report,the LOS discussion will focus on automobile traffic. In developing the Kent LOS standard, 22 subareas of the city were defined (see exhibit A). LOS standards were determined by estimating volume to capacity (V/C) ratios based on land use designations (see exhibit B). Acceptable V/C ratios are higher (low levels of service) in areas where the land use plan directs intensive growth. Areas designated for lower density land use have lower acceptable V/C ratios (high levels of service). It was assumed that high levels of congestion .(low LOS) are acceptable in the Central Business District and other major activity centers, but not in residential or low-density commercial areas where lower V/C ratios (high LOS) were required. Table 1.1 shows the V/C ratios 'associated with each LOS in.the transportation element of Kent's comprehensive plan. Table 1..1 LOS.DEFINITION A 0.01-0.60 B 0.61-0.70 C 0.71-0.80 D 0.81-0.90 E 0.91-0.98 F 0.99+ ' Level of service(LOS)is a qualitative estimate of the performance efficiency of transportation facilities in a community. "LOS A—low volume,high speeds,no delay;LOS B—stable flow with reasonable freedom to select speed;LOS C —stable flow,but speed and maneuverability are affected by the presence of others;LOS D—speed and maneuverability are severely restricted,small additions to traffic flow generally will cause operational problems; LOS E—operating conditions at or near the capacity of the roadway, low speeds,freedom to maneuver is extremely difficult;LOS F—forced flow operation at very low speeds,operations are characterized by stop and go traffic. ' Sum of entering automobile volume on road divided by the sum of automobile lane capacity on the road 2 Table 1.2 shows the adopted levels of service for the 22 traffic zones in Kent. Table 1.2 ZONE LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) STAl4DARDS ZONE LAND USE TYPE I WITH TIP LAND USE CATEGORY EST)A V/C LOS 1 CBD Urban Activity Center < 0.8 _ C 2 Industrial Urban < 0.7 B 3 Industrial Urban >0.7 C 4 Industrial Urban 0.7 B 5 Industrial Urban <0.7 B 6 NMR Urban > 0.8 D 7 Agricultural Rural <0.7 R j 8 111DR/Commercial Urban > 0.8 D 9 CommercialfRec./HDR Urban < 0.7 B 10 CBD Urban Activity Center <0.8 C 11 N IDR Urban > 0.8 D 12 Industrial/Comm/PIDR Urban > 0.7 C 13 IMDR Urban <.0.7 B 14 CommercialMDR Urban Activity Center <0.7 B 15 AG/Park/Ind. Rural < 0.8 C 16 MDR Urban < 0.7 B 17 Agricultural Rural <0.7 B 18 AgriculturaLfPark Rural < 0.7 B 19 N MR Urban < 0.7 B 20 LDR Rural <0.7 B 21 LDR Rural < 0.7 B 22 LDR Rural The Neighborhood Traffic Control Program (NTCP) deals with two problem areas: volume control and speed control. Typically, the problems are related. Drivers attempting to save time will cut through a neighborhood to avoid congestion on certain arterials or to avoid inconvenient traffic control devices. They will also drive at speeds that exceed the posted limits in order make it through the neighborhood quickly. Consequently, some of the traffic calming devices employed to address volume control are very similar to those that address speed control. They are designed to either force drivers to slow down (thereby eliminating the time saving incentive for using the street as a cut through), or to prevent them from entering a particular street section altogether. Both the volume control and speed control aspects of the program are comprised of two phases: the first employs a variety of passive control devices; the second, physical alterations to the street section. Criteria have been developed to delineate the threshold conditions that warrant the use of various traffic calming devices. The criteria was designed to support and maintain level of service standards for automobile traffic on neighborhood-residential streets as determined by the transportation element of the city's comprehensive plan. Table 1.3 shows the criteria for the Neighborhood Traffic-Volume Control program. 3 Table 1.3 VOLUME CONTROL PROGRAM CRITERIA NTCP VOLUME CONTROL Street or Roadway RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL Classification STREET COLLECTOR COLLECTOR ARTERIAL Design Capacity(ADT) I 1,000 Vehicles 3,500 Vehicles 5,000 Vehicles Average Daily Traffic Design Speed(MPH) 25 MPH 30 MPH 35 MPH Number of Lanes TWO TWO THREE Road Width 28-32 Feet 36 Feet ( 36 Feet Parking Widthss Strip Lane I (8) 12-16 (8) Feet I (8) 10-10 (8) Feet 12-12-12 Feet On Street Parking Permitted YES YES NO CAR+Form Required YES YES YES - Traffic Study Required YES YES YES VOLUME CONTROL PHASE 1 OPTIONS Neighborhood Support 70%and 70% 70%and 70% 70%and 70% Needed Parking Variants YES YES NO Turn Prohibition Sips YES YES YES Follow Up Traffic Study YES YES NO One Way Streets and Signs YES I YES YES Follow Up Traffic Study YES YES YES Police Enforcement YES YES YES Follow U Traffic Study YES YES YES Phase 1 Time Frame 1 YEAR 1 YEAR 1 YEAR VOLUME CONTROL PHASE 2 OPTIONS V/C >Zone LOS V/C>Zone LOS and and V/C >Zone LOS Threshold Volumes Non-local Traffic> Non-local Traffic> .20 ADT .20 ADT Street Section Features Vertical curb, Gutter Vertical curb, Gutter 1 Vertical curb, Gutter Neighborhood Support I 70%and 70% 70%and 70% 70%and 70% Needed Forced Turn Channelizatiou YES YES YES Entry, Exit Chokers YES NO NO Diagonal Diverter YES NO I NO Median Barriers YES YES YES Citizen's Action Request Form 4 Row fifteen (15) identifies whether or not a formal traffic study to evaluate the interim results of the selected alternative will be done by the city. Row sixteen (16) identifies a Phase 1 alternative and whether or not it is appropriate for the road classification. A one-way street designation (along with the appropriate signing) is a regulatory measure subject to police enforcement. It restricts entry/exits to/from neighborhoods. One way street patterns. Row seventeen (17) identifies whether or not a traffic study to evaluate the interim results of the selected alternative will be conducted by the city. Row eighteen (18) identifies a Phase 1 alternative and whether or not it is appropriate for the road classification. Police enforcement is extensive traffic enforcement, "emphasis patrols." Row nineteen (19) identifies whether or not a traic study to evaluate the interim results of the police enforcement alternative will be conducted by the city. Row twenty(20) identifies the length of time it takes to complete Phase 1. Volume Control Phase 2 Options Section Row twenty-one (21) identifies the table section (Volume Control Phase 2) Row twenty-two (22) identifies the threshold volumes required for each road classification, after Phase 1 alternatives have been deployed for the period of one year, before the city will consider implementing a Phase 2 option. (V/C > Zone LOS means that the volume to capacity ratio must exceed the level of service standard for the traffic zone. Non-local Traffic > .20 ADT means that the volume of non-local traffic traveling the road on a daily basis must equal or exceed twenty percent (20%) of the total traffic volume traveling the road on a daily basis. Row twenty-three (23) identifies the street section features that are required to make the Phase 2 alternatives viable for each road classification. Vertical curbs will discourage vehicles from driving around a traffic.' ontrol device. Gutters are necessary to handle storm water drainage. Row twenty-four (24) identifies the level of neighborhood support needed (as determined by ballot or petition) before the city takes a specific course of action among Phase 2 alternatives. (70% and 70°o means that seventy percent of the residents plus seventy percent of the property owners in a neighborhood need to approve of the city's plan before it is implemented. Row twenty-five (25) identifies a Phase 2 alternative and whether or not it is appropriate for the road classification. A forced turn channelization is a raised curb constructed in the road that prohibits vehicles from executing specific movements at an intersection. Row twenty-six (26) identifies a Phase 2 alternative and whether or not it is appropriate for the road classification. An entry-exit choker is a curb extension that creates a barrier to traffic in one direction of a street while permuting traffic in the opposite direction to pass through. Row twenty-seven (27) identifies a Phase 2 alternative and whether or not it is appropriate for the road classification. A diverter is a barrier placed diagonally across an intersection to force drivers to make a sharp turn but not allow other movements. 6 tVei;hborhood Traf c Volume Control Program Criteria Table Volume Control Section The first row of table 1.3 on page 4 identifies the table section (NTCP Volume Control). Row two (2) identifies the three types of street or roadway classifications the Neighborhood Traffic Control Program (NTCP) is responsible for: residential (or residential access) streets, residential collectors and residential collector arterials. Row three (3) identifies the average daily traffic the road is estimated to carry in terms of the actual number of cars or trucks traveling along the road on a daily basis. Row four (4) identifies speed limit for the road. Row five (5) identifies the number of driving lanes on the road. Residential collector arterials also have a center lane for making left turns. Row six (6) identifies the total width of the road in feet. Row seven (7) identifies the width of the parking strips on the road in feet, as well as the width of the driving lanes in feet. The parking lane widths are in parenthesis. Row eight (8) states whether parking is allowed on the road. Parking is not allowed on residential collector arterials. Row nine (9) states whether or not a Citizen's Action Request is required from the neighborhood. A Citizen's Action Request is a form that is completed by a neighborhood resident, which requests trafnc calming services from the city. Row ten (10) identifies whether or not a formal traffic study will be done by the city. Volume Control Phase 1 Options Section Row eleven (11) identifies the table section(Volume Control Phase 1 Options) Row twelve (12) identifies the level of neighborhood support needed (as determined by ballot or petition) before the city takes a specific course of action among Phase 1 altematives. (70% and 70% means that seventy percent of the residents plus seventy percent of the property owners in a neighborhood need to approve of the city's plan before it is implemented. Row thirteen (13) identifies a Phase 1 alternative and whether or not it is appropriate for the road classification. Parking variants are simply different methods for neighborhood residents to park their vehicles on the street section. Parking areas create narrower roadways and increased activity leading to increased attention by drivers. Row fourteen (14) identifies a Phase 1 alternative and whether or not it is appropriate for the road classification. A turn prohibition sign (no left turn, no right turn) is a regulatory measure subject to police enforcement. 5 Row twenty-eight (28) identifies a Phase 2 alternative and whether or not it is appropriate for the road classification. A median is a barrier along the cerrterline of a roadway to prohibit left turns or cross traffic. Table 1.4 SPEED CONTROL PROGRAM CRITERLA, NTCP SPEED CONTROL RESIDENTIAL Street or Roadway RESIDENTIAL. RESIDENTIAL COLLECTOR Classification STREET COLLECTOR ARTERIAL Design Capacity(ADT) I 1,000 Vehicles I 3,500 Vehicles 5,000 Vehicles Averaze Daily Traffic Design Speed(viPH) 25 MPH I 30 MPH I 35 Iv1PH Number of Lanes TWO I TWO THREE Road Width 28-32 Feet ` 36 Feet 36 Feet Parkin Stri O,Lane Widths (8) 16 (8) Feet (8) 10-10(8) Feet 12-12-12 Feet On street Parking Permitted YES j YES NO CAR Form Required YES YES YES Traffic Study Required I YES YES YES SPEED CONTROL PHASE 1 OPTIONS Brush Trims YES YES YES Traffic Safety Campaign YES YES YES Speed Radar Board YES YES � YES Neighborhood Speed Watch YES YES YES Parking Variants YES YES NO Follow Up Traffic Study YES YES YES Warning, Guide,and NfUTCD,70%+700/6 MUI'CD,70%+70% MUTCD, 700/6+700/6 Regulatory Sigiiing Pavement Ivlarlarrgs NfUTCD,70%+70% MUTCD,70%+70% IvfUTCD, 70%+70% Rumble Strips I YES.70%+700,16 YES.70%+70% YES,70%+70% Follow Up Traffic Study YES YES YES Police Enforcement YES YES YES Follow Up Traffic Study_ YES YES YES Reduce Speed Limit 70%+70%and 70%+70%and 70%+70%and Per RCW6.61.415 I Council Approval Council A royal Councils royal Follow U Traffic Studv YES YES YEAR Phase 1 Time Frame I YEAR 1 YEAR 1 SPEED CONTROL PHASE 2 OPTIONS 85%Speed 10 NLPH> 85%Speed 10 MPH> Threshold Speeds 85%Speed> 35 NIPH S ed.limit Sneed limit Vertical curb, Gutter, Vertical curb, Gutter, Vertical curb, Gutter, Street Section Features Grade<8% Grade<8% Grade<8% Neig borhood Support Needed 70%+70% 70%+70% 70%+70% Entry, E-at, Mid-block Chokers 175 foot straightaway 250 foot straightaway NO to mid-block choker to mid-block choker Traffic Circles 175 foot straightaway 1250 foot straightaway NO to circle to circle Speed Humps Vertical curb,175 foot IVertical curb,250 foot NO straig taway to hump I strain tawaY to hum Raised Crosswalks 175 foot straightaway 1250 foot straightaway NO to crosswalk to crosswalk Chkcanes 175 foot straightaway 250 foot straightaway 300 foot straightaway to first bulb to fast bulb to first bulb 7 Table 1.4 shows the criteria for the Neighborhood Traffic-Speed Control program. Typically, speed limits are determined by the design of the roadway, the behavior of reasonable and prudent drivers on that roadway, and statutory requirements. The speed limits for Washington state roadways are determined by RCW 46.61.400. They are 25 miles per hour on city and town streets, 50 miles per hour on county roads, and 60 miles per hour on state highways. RCW 46.61.415 gives local jurisdictions the ability to increase or decrease the speed limit if an engineering and traffic investigation determines that it is reasonable to do so. Local jurisdictions cannot increase the speed limit to more than 60 miles an hour, or decrease it to less than 20 miles per hour. Speed limit enforcement is largely a function of the local jurisdiction's customs and practices. Although the law assesses fines for drivers who exceed the posted speed limit by as little as one mile per hour, the custom of the local enforcement authority may be to write tickets only if the driver exceeds some predetermined threshold speed. For example, the posted speed limit is 25 miles per hour, but the local policy is to write tickets only if the driver exceeds the posted speed limit by 10 miles per hour or more. Subsequently,the NTCP criteria developed to delineate threshold speed conditions that warrant the use of Phase 2 traffic control devices are based on local enforcement practices. Neighborhood Traffic Speed Control Program Criteria Table Speed Control Section The first row of table 1.3 on page 4 identifies the table section (NTCP Speed Control). Row two (2) identifies the three types of street or roadway classifications the Neighborhood Traffic Control Program (NTCP) is responsible for: residential (or residential access) streets, residential collectors and residential collector arterials. Row three (3) identifies the average daily traffic the road is estimated to carry in terms of the actual number of cars or trucks traveling along the road on a daily basis. Row four(4) identifies speed limit for the road. Row five (5) identifies the number of driving lanes on the road. Residential collector arterials also have a center lane for making left turns. Row six (6) identifies the total width of the road in feet. Row seven (7) identifies the width of the parking strips on the road in feet, as well as the width of the driving lanes in feet. The parking lane widths are in parenthesis. Row eight (8) states whether parking is allowed on the road. Parking is not allowed on residential collector arterials. Row nine (9) states whether or not a Citizen's Action Request is required from the neighborhood. A �. Citizen's Action Request is a form that is completed by a neighborhood resident, which requests traffic calming services from the city. Row ten (10) identifies whether or not a formal traffic study will be done by the city. 8 r Speed Control Phase 1 Options Section Row eleven (11) identifies the table section (Speed Control Phase 1 Options) Row twelve (12) identifies a Phase 1 altemative and whether or not it is appropriate for the road classification. A brush trim involves the clearing away of bushes, branches or other vegetation that may be creating a sight distance, safety hazard for vehicles attempting to enter onto a road Row thirteen (13) identifies a Phase 1 altemative and whether or not it is appropriate for the road classification. A traffic safety campaign involves educating neighborhood residents via newsletters, brochures and public meetings about behaviors that improve safety and safety awareness. Row fourteen (14) identifies a Phase 1 alternative and whether or not it is appropriate for the road classification. The speed radar board is a reader board that shows approaching motorists the posted speed limit while displaying that motorist's actual speed. Row fifteen (15) identifies a Phase 1 altemative and whether or not it is appropriate for the road classification. The neighborhood speed watch involves local residents who use radar equipment to record vehicle speeds. A letter is then written to the registered owners of vehicles that were exceeding the speed limit asking them to obey the posted speed limits. Row sixteen (16) identifies a Phase 1 altemative and whether or not it is appropriate for the road classification. Parking variants are simply different methods for neighborhood residents to park their r vehicles on the street section. Parking areas create narrower roadways and increased activity leading to increased attention by drivers. Row seventeen (17) identifies whether or not a traffic study to evaluate the interim results of the selected alternative will be conducted by the city. Row eighteen (18) identifies a Phase 1 alternative and whether or not it is appropriate for the road classification. Warning, guide and reo�latory signing is the posting of signs that inform motorists about desired or required driver behavior. The threshold criteria for this option are also identified: NIUTCD is the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices. It is the standard used throughout the country for the design and deployment of traffic control devices. 70%+ 70%is the level of neighborhood support needed (as determined by ballot or petition) before the city implements this option. Row nineteen (19) identifies a Phase 1 alternative and whether or not it is appropriate for.the road classification. Pavement markings are painted legends on the roadway to alert drivers of special conditions. The threshold criteria for this option are also identified: NMCD is the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices. It is the standard used throughout the country for the design and deployment of traffic control devices. 70% + 70%is the level of neighborhood support needed (as determined by ballot or petition) before the city implements this option. Row twenty (20) identifies a Phase 1 alternative and whether or not it- is appropriate for the road classification. Rumble strips are raised buttons on the road, which serve to alert motorists to a special condition. 70% + 70% is the level of neighborhood support needed (as determined by ballot or petition) before the city implements this option. Row twenty-one (21) identifies whether or not a traffic study to evaluate the interim results of the selected alternative will be conducted by the city. 9 Row twenty-two (22) identifies a Phase 1 option and whether or not it is appropriate for the road classification.Police enforcement is extensive traffic enforcement, "emphasis patrols." Row twenty-three (23) identifies whether or not a traffic study to evaluate the interim results of the selected alternative will be conducted by the city. Row twenty-four (24) identifies a Phase 1 alternative and whether or not it is appropriate for the road classification. Reduce the speed limit involves legally lowering the maximum speed allowed on a road. 70%and 70% is the level of neighborhood support needed (as determined by ballot or petition) before the city takes the specific course of action. This option would also require council approval Row twenty-five (25) identifies whether or not a traffic study to evaluate the interim results of the selected alternative will be conducted by the city. Row twenty-six (26) identifies the length of time it takes to complete Phase 1. Speed Control Phase 2 Options Section Row twenty-seven (27) identifies the table section (Speed Control Phase 2 Options) Row twenty-eight (28) identifies the threshold speeds required for each road classification, after Phase 1 alternatives have been deployed for the period of one year, before the city will consider implementing a Phase 2 option. For residential streets, the 85`h percentile vehicle speed should exceed 35 miles per hour. For residential collectors and residential collector arterials, the 85" percentile speed should be greater than 10 miles per hour over the posted speed limit. The 85`s percentile speed is the average speed at which 85% of the vehicles are traveling on a particular roadway. The 85`h percentile speed is typically used to determine the appropriate speed limit for a roadway. Row twenty-nine (29) identifies the street section features that are required to make the Phase 2 alternatives viable for each road classification. Vertical curbs will discourage vehicles from driving around a traffic control device. Gutters are necessary to handle storm water drainage. Grades < 8%means that the slope of the roadway should be less than 8%. Row thirty (30) identifies the level of neighborhood support needed (as determined by ballot or petition) before the city takes a specific course of action among Phase 2 alternatives. 70% and 70% means that seventy percent of the residents plus seventy percent of the property owners in a neighborhood need to approve of the city's plan before it is implemented. Row thirty-one (31) identifies a Phase 2 alternative and whether or not it is appropriate for the road classification. An entry-exit, mid-block choker is a curb extension that creates a barrier to traffic in one direction of a street while permitting traffic in the opposite direction to pass through. The straightaway distance requirements are guidelines found in the MUTCD. They relate to the placement of advance warning signs informing drivers of the traffic control device. The distances are required in order for the driver to perceive the warning sign, identify what it means, decide what they need to do, and then decelerate to the desired speed needed to safely negotiate the traffic control device. Row thirty-two (32) identifies a Phase 2 alternative and whether or not it is appropriate for the road classification. A traffic circle is a raised island constructed in the roadway intersection that forces traffic into circular maneuvers. 10 Row thirty-three (33) identifies a Phase 2 alternative and whether or not it is appropriate for the road classification. A speed hump is a raised and curved section of pavement across the roadway. Row thirty-four (34) identifies a Phase 2 alternative and whether or not it is appropriate for the road classification. A raised crosswalk is a crosswalk raised above and across the roadway pavement. Row thirty-five (35) identifies a Phase 2 alternative and whether or not it is appropriate for the road classification. Chicanes are curbed islands protruding into the roadway, leaving a single lane or narrow two-lane gap. 11 Neighborhood Traffic Control Program Administrative Process CITIZEN REQUEST NTCP BROCHURE AND CAR FORM SENT CAR FORA RECEIVED DATA COLLECTION AND FIELD REVIEW ANALYSIS 6-8 WEEKS DEVELOP PHASE 1 TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENT PLAN AND SURVEY NEIGHBORHOOD 1I LPLEMENT PHASE PLAN AND MONITOR EFFECTIVENESS THROUGHOUT THE YEAR EFFECTIVE? YES NO MONITOR AFTER 1 YEAR FOR DEVELOP PHASE 2 AND SURVEY NEIGHBORHOOD LONG TERM EFFECTS CONVENE NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING IMPLEMENT PHASE 2 AND MONITOR EFFECTIVENESS 6 MONTH REVIEW AND NEIGHBORHOOD SURVEY REVISE,REMOVE OR RETAIN PER:vIANENTLY MONITOR AFTER 1 YEAR FOR LONG TERM EFFECTS 12 EXHIBIT A CITY OF KENT. SUB-AREA TRAFFIC ZONE MAP 13 z g F ocn ,a CQ Z. —E-12, i r- 1 i-✓1 C. � I'�1 ✓4'�1 $+ 9tt CI1 Ir11 - 1 _ I Ll l 35 3nY GOt 35 90, M I a—Z{I 75 S1 r-, I •�� 753tir 0011,3s ON 3nr r Ttl e' I Li W ilM i 3nr L6 L9 i as s 3,Y1. C\2 >n{{ s N L J I r oY I I I B s>nr KLe I Gl. r j r♦ H G I I —� E — sl>nr zC �M ,Ca o s3tiYQ9 I I �I n n L911 a5 1 I•M AaY°A M OI t9l bs MN AafWAM 1`j is i l� \L r 516r- - 11 .i4 S s4., aJOjs�a;Ul TI , E i EXHIBIT B CITY OF KENT LAND USE DESIGNATION MAP 14 Fan! - c ;.'K yr> 'lreru-� �*'�..i„+h3 �°'Mi�'S a � ..=..=•�:�.;`:=:i^Y:::=:.�.F _ _ ��— s� ,�rr:.�s•=.mac-r.W.._..._ ,c[Vic,�¢��-fJ',-2�i.t�t?�r�t Z�•��.<- I ..3�• t .T R a � �� ■ _!�i c _�E (ram M� i BLIMM APPENDIX 1 ILLUSTRATIONS OF TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES 15 SPEED RADAR BOARD s � .� ++,- `f •�' a'•.�3.',�-'yam,°„ ri i <+ a Ut ' .y .. b- 44 ZIF } sec C 'f+s-►'fin j{ •� lrs r- 1 45" t"i _ hs '3S s -,r+-'� t,.q'Cj ". eP�r� '.�.• �;Z'1•: - ' T ' �_ ." �! ~ -1 .ate :�•t•. _ � , �- - �, -� `i .a...ram `^y �-3' _ } •� ��., K _' . ' . , '- CHICANES/PARKING VARIANTS �i r'~+l'��'1.ii,�7�'A'+�'d••r'd Tom. � l � � _-..�..._...�_.�.x_..�u .+. ,�•�� -tin:r�r M�.. .•i• :'�y �'+x ', _ •.ram.'. `r. .�' :� .3 w±f'„�1 �•" -. ,;;:fir_'.' t•�:,j,,s'S-!!��6,f :� •• ••+•�,} '.r•: •4 '-,r;r�.;-r•�• .'�� •.. -,��, '..,ice '! .'�� - ;.��+!�� •ti.„ .,.},,.�+,.,,. „fir. •- ,,;. ''.,:. ., y T��a{ •i � f V-� ��, `t 5 SIGNS/MARKINGS/RUMBLE STRIPS zl f r r r i _ y .-ice 4 T •�. r cr- ' r t ,.;c SPEED LIMIT . ......... �?'iteh w�•j J'v ro[i :w� v V •W'F .3,xrYr�l.X`..FF"?z�Zi�tiwL �. s-_= T € w.�4 --r 4c�,Li,.7 tii �.�, c �f=S,'�z�"'�' r�" } 'Y•t~ '� it Iry f Ileg�. y' z b-' _t�}zy�� x _ �,a �4�_1R-r �2ui H •�,.� u�:a'"�'s v. � i.:i�i'v`'"o'Jr=�. '4 ..� i+�lE 41 ` r r? Z j� y�"•t R. ;. -L ai�y �F�'T'T'L„z'aLr"s F .+c yam-1 �r"i` 7t'-*..�•��<•S'�c, r _ ... +{ c +' �s z r`rn iyi,�'�-"'�y� N7!i' Sw r�"r S. rYT,•� _ �;"Y.i ,r�.,•.Zz-.. �'y,Y R, d.+ri-0..'i g,;. '�,+�tAe x `y' 1a! t ' r :. ♦_ - �r :- t,t _. ?-.t� _Y.� � .-_ � -a. '+'' ; s :c � At,c �Rr L,�T fex "+G ,y_s+.."Ys.n &� .4o-j•t�� .� •�e'�-es"i' , r„ -?i •- c F R• h . t' r i�'•i. ng �,,c r a. .•' '` ad�'� +� �� ,g•r'Z �ti-4•r.1{, eve` .�� .�a �..�*,—+ `.x�v-=� _ lF' C�• �t 4 �{�{y '?f 1 '2fTt�• o��i�K.�Fc�. yv� l-7C�T�•J�.yT'iY.•L'?Y -K�F-�l•A� _ _, j��T� j. :e R�•`]- •N KEY ZC�' ti ---•75 aY3`ry-�' 9 _r :. .�.�b'� T s� .3`i# _ 7 t 1 t-.� �:r r c. _ �_'�. "3 ,•-y'Y1..�t�.+'�Y`�"� 3•t"�`�r,;,.,.F -_ V r Y. _ yip. x _ '-. f�' 1FT se~-• Y- rb '1"1 '`f7.,t'e'. r{ "- -'"'M1 Y .""r� . .� . .t�fL v. -�ter• � c� _:A' ��i~�byr.-t.Q=y�� .�sS}z.r�¢5.,"f?�u Yii+-� '��' c ,�.•l - -'� ; ��eF �'.� k�-i•ram t i�a a �sy � �y '�-r� t K �.�1.�� .,.y�1..� .r� ��.-_'t E. ' `r •. �E� r .5rer, "�+L "Zjt. l {i�c-aF'a. c vTy a`�J`h,,G,��-S•�' - 'T_ • :?:�> t)s',,..�MF ;c.%""& } fr,,,,,. �kw s'`+r _��rtil��t��_ !`'��fy�'4. 7.s'��y�4'Y*e'.-p'Sy Tt_ cam' '�• � �c �..-._ r4s�'•'Je: t�s. ri'•<'.]r 'h z y. ^^ -f.y>--..a3 , r^ .r > +� � �•e!" '�,.. " =F --r� .� y.- Y S •t y�=•tea-1 F� %'c h--v."r M1 Lx - S - .r F- -.�.j t a•.,' ..z1 4's a +^'2, .r<a''•i` 'L' •r Yam. '?""i" - ,� '•� __ r � !� {! �� yam' .-t� � a.£..'.�..P's- -,�-3.t r" ...�^rd ii.� 4.....h =.• - _��" r..'. y�'&�:Ui�* �'L'-�-�� -:. -•c+adKn •��•F"yc. ,�-cr'.1 �.•.,�•� �-c.1s "'�,.'�;� i'^�z�. J � �� __ rtx"s.�.e� �''v �u:r�'?.,�. "�? '� ��,��i-a".,,p... -�.•tit� -' , �"- 114 J-'yr"'r •e'��r�Y'r�. � :S,•E.y.F�•��t2.--�--r-C S_c 'K_`�L..�.•' `l .*- -R. c'fj .r+a � .� �f`Sfa{•�ei�L'� a'�.�'"r-.:Y3"ri"�r`�3� `�S'.-te �+�' �"i�`�'.F.t� � ��'`�.�71 y c.�s+•af�R`.e•``,'�� 1 'Y,-..-''H•�;'i� ....�-�..�e >�•'�i.r t N s-,�.t V -e ;,. - a. rr �•s.�-� s•ei'�'K>-TM1er a �.�i,r�'".ae �++,�-+`i•..*�-s4 4. -r��.+'„vn'~��wf�=.a--�,r-' - `- Safr Via.R M1"T'- �tTf� F �CYrw. ,�'Y •k � � �L� T WeJ� r-'�'`Y�5•W�.I�CQ�K� �.Lr�� ..� f,.tQ '.nv^..G, sr-..ram-.. •�.••�? .+ -Y v •-...3c � w.�t�•-.r�i•, Sq-'w...-:i..tih �hi'. _ +sNM�. :..r.�js--.nv.M t �.....t:re.�--w+ .fit�.•a�+�" r 'W#�!_f"+.�'Y7�'x�,,�. gar- . ,(�o".r..�_•�� k -_+.,..�•�-• '�'r-s"`�3.f"r.-�cry-t,:.t ar`�. � = n:Ya.�i -�r�"sa,-+� 'f-r- - off{ i ��',y�� '�� ! „e:� it a�� - s�ic'v.• .].c^r.>n..-s e�7..n•'�.:t•. M � `i r:� �,-�ay -t rs�•'�� a �� h`�' `aka" -fi` t er•.�A ar.h Ste_ �..�r.- C""Y�a+35",1*ai� k�Lr•�E! [�t.�'{Sw �d '. yf f+G• fC-K"=- ��f��lT.+a�ty 4sse.. 4, - +� MiY"r' +� �r 'L•ri _tom"ytT+fY1'i' MKpf�-?.A✓. f�i, _tJ, '.�_♦ .aT„rq"�•'.' -+/!a•lY-;t4�,�1 ^.J�Iq�q^}�+"T _AC• YR" ��. �4s��i..w-eta.-r �''�e�e. tv.e�a u s� +a. .5 {C•C` phi#:e-.tip •`�i:.�J^• "'ems °Sri"f..c_ ��i,�c..-x'ir`7ah�. ._:.z.v• .tIC1 �. ��3: '�RT'M'n�liw. W .e ,�r Y - ^X}"�`E-�rt4a4'b..+'S �.w' "A,�„o"� '�•�v� 2i 6L. `��'' '-.'��''�R"�-.�'yL�..e�'}'�—�'"''"�'.�3-�'3r.,� v�e��`5�s'sr` "'�."`.-�r t,'.*tt�d`--e�" c'�y"` ..�'�f��•..._ :� � .4 +,,,,r.a,. -ur .»M .3-: e>-'--• .r•a...�y;. * b+.�.V e' �.+- a xq..en•rt. �e -a+.-?'�F�+e• �'� �5t., �.'��w'."3��aN:;.u.zF.rarnr-�w- :•�L4�+u:7,• sues y "s•r ' .ate. 4i �k +d•�:t`� .i?»c�>�-1 �•4 .,- �tT' ea�wN�.rn,+-�� <-E--sa-f"..ai�.- ^tfi�.ay,sVL�..�-� -.S�•�•�.�g..r�-at�'� �� y�'� �.-i S~�� .M•� >�c'+�.+1�.--{`..Ae � 5319�53'a7K''F��F�^G.�.•S.di!,eb irlSi��13�� .~.`G.d�'.' • 9��ti ��Y i �T� � `..7+w�y 1.� R o.�Yh+t�v..3r>�+7e........�c_^y�'pr, `a,�-.Sr-Lti-..��,ro^�- .w•c. 7.g f aeo�t.�� _ �� 5,• -i� - ....ny •# w��`i+,R as ,tr"�"=!•+^t'r'h r � �". t -�i `&'- �?a,'�.�- . �*5e-•c?sa�s+ cK�r.'far�a.��,.�e�'*�``+`*'" _,FM1S,. }ersY•.ss r �a Ke,. �a� _ ^ ..,Fv •-..t- -�a..M1ay.-`-"` •-:+..a -,.irk' . kR �, ' J•y�-t w.(j� Y' � i'••i. ram- - R'� `'!ter^- !`"'Y�C7+ �y-+� - - t,{�.i'��+:-:Ew-v.. --:,�.*'sr �c. °i?Y s` ��` - saar•; .araMi ,ro'_ ae - -v- ••-.'L�_ a�•�, ix- � � �.r ad s+�. _ 'z y' ,4,+`�i �-:R,Ta-" Y j�;eye,.. -,�,=yn, wz x � '�scY,.r. - � •� '�• ��``�,•,�,y' '�T� Yc �'1. 4:a +..-- •s-^.x��*ems w � L " �}��""�-7"` 's>` .t�"to- - y,Fz,c+fT;,.-�sz _ ,cti. t ^r�t'f4_ + ii '� Fes "-3��•! �3, s`.. = s�3a•€� .+,�y._ �.. 4�C>T �:+m`a�'�..._i�i.. a�<,�-_..i' .+s-'�^� ke•c4�� !�,?....+'�, ��` i c Z r „r.y v.w _ T y r r�„�. "e.�" '<?� � ��-z -.s�C••2z td.ryL� �: �'i+t��}•.�a � 2 s �$ Y.,-.�A ^_ �� , s� S.Ts s r�Y•^^'�.c- �`'� .r 3:D ,r.r,.Y - .t -' t •t=}` Ln--+i•:x:�6 - yh � ';'!"•4T -.y� 'S P % _-. �7r��4-cr i'f '�' 'r-�-�'• ems' .r-s-z. +.. � Y � '�a �' � -�7 ,r�.�, z.:ti }-• - _ `fir'-�':,'� -. - - �; ,k:t•h `, •'Ti r �{ a`.. c � T .[�" rat�s y .�. _ etf�,.. z 1 ,i-,y��` 1 r i �L•�4�..``i x_`�T, -e'�"',u�- .•Vti`.�, f •- _ r'� .k• ie 9 Y k1r � 1 1-' - FTj. J41a�� Y r� �r��- .. •�� R POLICE ENFORCEMENT 'Qr'o'f'11r��•� 1- .� k• •� 4 'M.� l i ' " �.� Jr. • G. .All.�.� � ' LO IN • •'r-1.\��F€P+"'�''�:,dsw_�y,r-+ <<. ENTRY/EXIT/MID-BLOCK CHOKERS a cc 3r 4- - ' Fr'A -�•'?�' R �- -a Y Y! �. .1 W `MC C •' --rI?-,e.�..�1�� 7 Al J •!f t � � Y�rW ta?� Fit y t r• r --�.� -yy*�y'r 'Z�.. t r j, >��,'�,._..t-.+rf`e+ '�i. Lin✓I - �t,� -4 17 S.-;� '4 _ �' y� �yY•�" 3'-i � 7� 4�"� X:t`5� ti :3-� r�-` r .. 1c } a _.,, � ,`b"; - M r•'L '�r1��. .t >4 SY +t• L S cy'f f...�I4..J L-- -- ,� ,dG.,s �LV`a:r^ti=•a Y. - a 5 _ �i t+ 'fcF t --- 3 - y�_ '' wi sr 44 fair �4 wry :i Y 't _ T+i+-�.'s .� T`�ry'" •ay3Tr.77, `+ .•.A�R F: 4•- : .ra - k4a rat' 4 -- - � -� �J ��• r TRAFFIC CIRCLES -- .:yCC�'. - '•.�.�.�f`f<-}.�f.�.�-j+"L_Y�-'r�:ci •j �j a,Y,'•. ��•.r, i.=': ^ :+off �� - L • b�fi�r(irt1 ' r Is 1p �• r • r e' t • i �� Sd'► b -«r - K.•y Ff�Y ty •`�/. r _ sk�._�j�..-fit Q.t. _''—'"''i - •fir � r� .• .. 'i.•t e '�• ' �� T All- a1c :�t h• 1 � +. .t SPEED HUMPS IF �i f 617 70 Ir 'Pi iL 4 _ p _ ��. .ate +L�y. *r �jt ��j•...��"111�� ,�i1T it-� r la � I Y aR f r FORCED TURN CHANNELIZATION i —- w . e t s- `V t - Mang 10 ,} • :. tea. - rx �, go-* � �•-��< �• - r47 Eli x� _r $4 �3¢ 2 t• 5��.a��t� 9- `�G. ..,t J'"'i y�Y• �z�t..>.Tiv ,r _ ,�. F 4 f �t. q'-'` '"'�� a c� �t,., ..:{t� - -r K tom» ,. •, ��„�,!•';>$. .5.,' '? = a3 ''w..,. -! �'at'c � q�R �' `�"+-L'� .sv�r •� -r s is.. '+A'b ..1 Vim.-;+'TS i'�:°.��.-^" ?n�+.f`�'•�.4'7:�� '...;t. ,� _,:5�14�, -.; Y vim. DIAGONAL DIVERTER r - - - i -'4 .tom• � _ ``ti � "K z= { DIVERTER } _ a _ - ,`+• j„jf !'i'$ i 3 rr ma's• ? ��I .e � t• � �•'• ! .�; c��`:• k�� =ram .<4�' r• ��•}„ ,�� ._._. _ _ fir•- 1` �,.v•P .R - • - :�: 3 .Y ice''°. ''' t `?�.t = "�- s.+�Ltl �'� �{- « �wi•��[ f-r- - st_-: MEDIAN BARRIER - � �• ( ; .fit � �. - \,•: � � ,.-el ,S •, i.;` - •tom rya +� ` � + .. -�.• _ _' {_�� t �_ r r � .. � -� •'�"+i `may. '� =•-; M t y 3 S'O 41 It ADr Fy K l s• 40 64 .{ ?• - l .� S• , z •. Ate.,, •.i • ysj �-• Y� it, -f6•- rt -•-w._-�.k+�- - .:.a..ti..vrsir.,i� `talr3:;dr:r.....4�'.�K Ltt+�aa.s:+.�.._,.7%E?ru'kF..2?'�.'i`s#4�& �* �i APPENDIX 2 -- SUMMARY RESULTS OF TRAFFIC CALMING STUDIES IN ENGLAND, UK 16 TABLE 1 . MEASURES USED IN THE CASE STUDIES TYPES OF MEASURES Town Centre I Rural Residential 20mph Zones I 1. 2 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 47 Chicanes 12,4,10 1 n - 8. 2.,,26, o 2.,, 32, 3s 39, 40, 46, 51,So, 5 7. 62. 64, 66. 69, 76,80,32,83 Cycle Measures: 4 20, 27,34 45, 46,52,53, 56. 61, 63, 78, Slips, Lanes,'bypasses 83 85 Environmental 1, 2,0, 5.9.13 25, 26, 29,35 40. 53, 54• 75, 77. 78 Improvement I Gateways 1,13 15, 16, 17, 18, 21, 23, 26. 39. 51 I � . ., , 32. 37,38 Junction Priority Changes 1. 7 22 42,57, 62, 75, 77, 83 Junction Treatments: 11,12 17, 22. 25 39, 41, 43. 48, 49, 53, 6,1, 65. Tables, Entry/Exit I 68. 78 Mini-Roundabouts 3.4,111.12 22. 24. 2255. 26. 28. 31, 36 ^ ^ �, 5-., 55, 53, 63. 65, 66, Narrowings: 1, 2. 3 4, 5, 6. 7, d, 10. '3 14, 16. 19. 20. 21, 22. 39, 40, 42. 43, 44. 45. 49, 52, guild outs, Pinch points, 23, 24. 26. 27, 26, 29, 30, 53.555, 56, 57. 58, 62, 63, 64. Refuges 32. 34.35 66, 67,68. 69, 70. 75, 76" 77, 78,80. 85 Parking: 2, 5. . 24, 25. 29 39, 40, 43,52. 53, 57, 64, Protected, Restrictions 66. 69. 83 Road Closures 1 1 1 25 7 139, 42. 61, 63. 73, 73 Road Humps: 1, 2. 6. 7 10. 12 t 9, 22. 24, 25 28. 3'. 39 40, ^1, ^ Fiat Too. Round Toc, 4c, - Qo, 48, 35. 0„ , �c, 5� One-Way, wo-Way, Plateaus 62, 63, 65, 67, 68, i'1, 73, 74, Sneed Tables 75, 76. 77, 78, 80. 81, 84 85 Rumble Strips: I 20.32. 3:, 37 56, 60, 70. , 1, 72. 76, a0. 84 _"T1p5, "rf11n!-hur^.r� I I Speed Cameras I 17 Speed Cushions 44, 45. 56, 70 I Surface Treatments: 1.13 I 15, 21, 23, 24, 29, 38 52, 78 = Colour,Texture t - -- Visual Effects: 13 15, 16, 18, 19, 21, 27,30, 43,52,56,65, 69,80, 83 Signs, Markings, Planting 32, 34,38 4 =_ `No Humps': 4, 13 14, 15. 17, 18, 21, 26, 27. 51,52.55, 56,61, 66,69, 70, fm Successful schemes 29,30,32, 34.38 82 T -75 1 Table 2.1 Town Centre Case Studies Case I Traffic Speed Accidents I Study Location volume mph pia oa Cost Comments(See Ncte 1 beicw) I Before After Before After Before Alter c 35 15 3 0 E2.3m 20 mph zone.Larked with recevelcement and town 1 N_St us52x I rersnam relief road.Very excer,s;ve environmental wcrxs. Carax Ccnsiderabie accident and sceec reCuct;cn. 2 Norttiampronsnire 2540 2080 2-d 17 3.7 2 =Ck 20 mcn zone(terr.o).fiat top humps.pine i;:cir.ts. Rusncen chicanes.Expensive environmentally.SpeeC crcc nigh Street significant,ccnsCerable(potential)accicent Crcc. Herfcrdsnire 188C0 16500 25 20 I 15 8 E1.2m Maicr enhancement.Narrowing.reae humcs. 8crenamweed I Cevelcoer funcing.Relauvely expensive.s;gniricart I5henley Aoac speeC recuct;cn,ccns;ceracie acc:Cent recucxn. s Car,,cricges � n:re 110700 89C0 38 1-2 19 - _ 3Ck Mini rcurcaccuts.tra tic is;ancs,cnicanes.zyc:V _ator. cccr. lanes.-Reascracie cost.Signincant sceec rec-�::cn. corsceracle acc;cent recud;cn. l 5 zr-.vail 9CCC 79CC i 32 17 I II =Ck i Rcac humcs.narrowing,orctec;ec earxirg. I tnv,rcnmental treatment.,;elauvely exoensive. Sattasn I =cre Street I I I Ccrsiceracle sceec and potential acc:cent C.Izc. ` 8 pevan 18CC ACCO 23 11 0 2- C.2; —k Ccmcinec narowmg with flat ^o home.reve!cder 3arnstaoIe finarcec.L.cw cost with consiceracie sceec crcc. -u;v Street EYt,-a trainc due;o snort ter^,car nark. 7 Essex I 29 1 28 9 I _ < Junc'.ion aiterat;cns. narrowing,`tat tcc humcs. Peiicans. excensive. cnsi Scutner,c on Sea I Re!atrvery Ceerazle Marine Parace I 121: I acc;cent anc pecesman!nluri crcc.More ax:en5ive I I I I ccnsuitaaen may nave neicec. 8 Rant 30i,G SCCC - - ,.., 0.7 I _.2k I carry rcac home scheme on dual carriageway. Ciilingnam l Re!ativeiy excensve cut ccnsicerae!e accident Twycall C reeuction. Kam { 8CC0 NCO I 25 _ C I 12.5k riign auahty singte way ramcs usecl to slow t:a-ic aches zer I ane Ceter rat running. Reasenaele cost with cznscer- Vines'Lane I I acle acc:cert and Sdeed recuc^on. 1C 1s:e Cf wicr, I35 c _- i8 0 _ Sk II Pir.cn points c:us.numced z-;cane. �easonac,e zest =ryce I scheme,,, to ccnsiceraoie rscucncn in sceec- n a Ncr,-'walk I I I recreational ar=_a well useC cy oecestr:ans. �arvicKS-re I G r k �1 n rCunCaocut5 on so e5CC I _G 3 c:actes.CCcensive. I � 5cec•ai paving-ac:c oe rectaced.Not suczess tw. tie ca ace v I I Traffic oacems cnancec cue to etner iac::rs. 12 bVa.^NIC:<S'Jr� I 71C^G S4GC i 5 2 u i _e k naisec juncGcn cius seve.'al�iai zoo humps. Pe1aiively I ;ucov excensve cut consiceracle soeec and acc:cent Asnlawn a.cac I I I recucticn. 13 "iamcsnire NYA NY NY,, I ==PCk COT demcnsaaticn project.CetrunkeC'hign street' �olorS11e1C location.Narrowing,extensive environmental works. Dragon Street Intensive consultation. Lxoensive. Note 1. Comparative subjective comments are given regarding cost and effectiveness.These are based on the fol- lowing indicative criteria which may differ from individual authorities' own criteria and opinions: COST I 'Low' I 'Moderate' I 'Reasonable' I 'Expensive' Il Single Measure <°3.00A I 3.001-210.000 ( _10,001 -E20,000 I > •� y- Several Measures I <°.5000rkm I 5.001 -SO.000/km I �.50.001 -£1CO.000/kM I >Z100•�� EFFECTIVENESS 'Negligible' I 'Marginal' I 'Significant' `Considerable' Accidents reduced by c5'a I 5 a-109b I 10 0-30 0 >30 d Speed S+ reduced by I <2 Mon. 2-5 mcn I 5- 10 mph I >10 mph 26 Table 2.2 Rural Case Studies Case Traffic Speed Accidents Study Location volume mph pia pa Cost Comments(See Note 1,p.27) Before After Before After Before After 14 Somerset 4000 5000 47 35 1.8 1 _.Ck VISP scheme.Temporary materials.trial period. Stratton-cn-the- Narrowings priority features.Cost moderate with Fosse considerable speec crco. 15 Devon 2000 2CCO as 36 0.7 1.5 E9k VISP scheme.Gateway features,traffic isahcs. Halbertcn markings and speed rourCels. Moderate cost with significant speed drop. 16 Kent 6900 6900 40 38 2.3 2 _2.2k VISP low cost scheme involving specially autn- MaK(ieid I I I I onsed gateway signing. Not particularly effect,ve. 17 Cxferdshire 1 75CO 175C0 47 »1 1.3 1 E;2k Speed camera.Reasonable cost(excludes fines Nunenam I income). Significant speec croo. Little effect from Courtenay I gateways added later. 18 Hamcsnlre ( S e e I C a s e I s t u C y =-COk aCmph zone(3C0 km road).Comprerenscve New Forest I aoproacn to Heritage Area.Acc.dents and speec- reduced by range of features. 19 Camoricgesnlre 17CO 15CO 37 27 2.7 0.3 =32k Give way narrowings,series of round and flat too Gamlincay humps,bus route. Modest cost with constceracle accident and speed reduction. 2C Cambnegesnlre 10600 1 13CC 47 41, 5.7 2.7 _atlk Traffic islands and chicanes with'bv-Gasses'for Fen Dirmn I cyclists. Moderate cost with censice'raele potential accident reduction and significant soeed crop. I I 21 Devon 2900 29C0 38 35, I 0.3 0 _20k Gateway effect with central island located cn entry Newton Tracey I I to village.Reasonable cost but marginal soeed crco. 22 Hertfcresnire 7300 6850 35 24 2.8 1 E-GOk 3Vz years consultation. Narowrng.speec tables. Buntingfcrd throttle humps, mini. High quality enhancement. Expensive.Considerable soeed anc accident crco. 23 Hentcresnlre 2000 18CG -2 39 0.7 0 E18k Excerimental on eompn road. Narrowings ,cast- Old Knepworth ellatec sur"acing,gateways. Moderate cost. Negiicible soeed Croo. Mere measures proposed. 2e Hertfcresnire- 71CO 71-CO j 31 16 2 E?2k Mini rcur,caccut.road rumps,narrc-:+inc. :ieiaave!y S nsteac Acpcts;1 I I I exeenslve.Soeec and acGlcent crco ccrsdera-le. Excermentai scheme.reciacec by Case Scucv 25. 25 Hertferesnire 71CO 7CCO 31 22 2 =c7EK Extensive environmental works.Peclaces ease S dv SianStead ADGfa(21 2e Humcs replaced by raised tacle areas. cx;;enstve but consideracle seed arc acczeni crco. 26 Kent 100130 1COCO 47 34 3.7 0 _140k Two primary routes in village. Environmental Sarre works.Gateways, refuges.chicane,mint,c,osure. Expensive but considerable speec and(potential) accident Croc. 27 Kent 9a00 9400 60 53 5 2.a _75k Reduced number of lanes,refuges,cycle lanes. Gravesend 2.5 km.Cost moderate.Significant speed crop and considerable accident drop. 28 Kent 8500 9800 45 27 5 0 E3COk Extensive scheme. Flat top humps, minis,refuges. Hoo St Werburgh Landscaping.Joint funding. Expensive but speed and(potential)accident drop considerable. 29 Kent 13500 13500 40 35 3 2.4 E425k Gateways,chicanes,textured surfaces and street .` Brasted lighting.Expensive environmental works with marginal speed drop. 27 Table 2.2 Rural Case Studies (cont) Case Traffic Speed Accidents Study Location volume mph pia pa Cost Comments(See Note 1,p. 27) Before After Before After Before After I 30 Leicestershire 10200 51 44 10.7 8 `:50k Villages on a principal road.Narowings. A427, Five Villages Gateways,lighting imorovements, signs. markings. Low cost.Noticeabie speed croo. 31 Oxfordshire 8400 63C0 37 28 4 1.7 `55k Rat run. Road humos,minis. Moderate cost win Kennington significant accident and speed Crop.Lower nur^o5 may have been OK. 32 Strathclyde 550 550 49 41 3.7 1 £15k Gateways,refuges,rumble strips,signs.marKirgs. Croy Moderate cost.Significant steed drop in one direction ano considerable acciaent crco otter^ua. 33 West Yorksnve 48 39 °2 5k Low cost jiggle bars. Unsuccessful. Hicn and low West Bretton speeds in conflict and nose complaints fra^: I residents.Jiggle bars removed. 34 vVest Sussex 1113.550 11350 I 56 I c.3 -.6 I __� Measure;'nc!t;., d e narowing, the prdvisic'n pi c Birdham c✓c!e track and hatched central reserve. Mccerte cost with considerable speed drop. 35 West Sussex 51200 3600 0.3 0 _85k Envircnmentally sensitive. Road humos,narrowing, Bramber cnicane. Expensive but main objective to red:ze tnrcucn traffic acnievec. I. 36 West Sussex 13C0 1080 40 25 0.3 ' 0 Z25k Road humos,minis, 30 mcn limit,to enccurace rontwell thrcuen traffic onto by-pass. Moderate cost wit,. considerable steed droc. 37 West Sussex 101C0 10100 42 39 I 1.3 0.8 =9.5k Combination of gateways and mini road humcs. Selsey(1) Unsuccessful.Noise complaints from residents Replaced by Case Study 38. I 38 West Sussex 101GC 10100 40 32 1.3 0 23k Edge and centre markings and road studs to Selsey(2). narrow carriaceway. Low cost with significant steed cmo. Reolacec Case Study 37. Table 2.3 Residential Case Studies Case Traffic Speed Accidents Study Location volume mph pia pa Cost Comments(See Note 1, P. 27) Before After Before After Before After 39 North Yorks^ire 4000 4000 27 ig 2.3 1 E1301k 20 mon zone. Gateways, numbs,built outs,one York way plugs,chicanes,raised junctions, residents !: The Groves parking. Moderate cost.Considerable speed and acciaent reCucticn. 40 West Yorkshire 680 600 32 19 1.3 1 _105k 20 mph zone.Chicanes.narrowings,plarorms in Bradford two streets.Relatively expensive due to mater- Scotchman Road ials and street lighting but considerable,peed erco. 41 Suffolk 2000 2000 30 16 4.2 1 E85k 20 mph zone.40 humps of different types. Ipswich Moderate cost with considerable dreo in accidents Britannia Area and speeds. 42 Manchester 2500 1100 12 8.8 NYA £175k 20 mph zone. Humps,signals,narrowing,one- Crumpsall Green way,closure. Reasonable cost.Full evaluation not yet available. -,g Table 2.3 Residential Case Studies (Cont) Case Traffic Speed Accidents Study Location volume mph pia pa Cost Comments(See Note 1,p.27) Before After Before After Before Aftef 43 Dorset 5333 - 27 16 25 c320k 20 mpn zone.Plateaus,protected parking,mini- Poole roundabouts.Relatively expensive but consideraole Upper Parkstone speec crop and accident reduction potential. 44 Warwickshire 3C00 3000 30 20 2.7 0 c3k 20 mph zone. 4 pinch points with speed cushion. Nuneaton Low cost and considerable speec reductions.No Cedar Road accidents to date.Compare Case Study 45. 45 Warwickshire 25GO 2500 42 27 a - Z10k 20 mph zone oerioheral road.5 ccset pinch punts Nuneaton with spend cushion.Low cost,cons;ceraole speed Qu.Elizabeth Roac drop.No accidents to date.Compare Case Stucy 44 a6 Warwickshire 9000 9CC0 a1 30 11 1 =4k 20 mpn zone oeripherai road.Severe cnicanes Nuneaton I now removed cue to complaints about ccnges:;on. Whittleford Roac Low cost with consideraole soeec recuction. 220 I aG S Q 79 _ ' 20 mpn zone. Fiat top humps in biocK oav;r.c. Stoke on Trent Some humps mccified for hearses. Mccerate Fencen Area test.Considerable accident anc speed reCucxn. 18 Avon 7CC0 3750 36 23 2.3 0 _4Gk Flat'cc)humps anc raised;unction on a bus route. Bristoi Ramos to be extencee. Reasonable cos: wi;❑ Throgmoron Roac considerable sceec anc octent;ai accident crop. i =9 'Nest Yorksnire 3a00 2000 3a 25 1 '.3 0 °7Ck A series of single way narrowec ramps,entry Bradford ramps and;unction table. Reasonable cost w,tn Upper Rusnion RC considerable speed and accident droo. - 50 Loncon 700 530 39 2' 2.7 1.5 -31 k RounC coo humps.Moderate cost includes West Wickam additional measures for displaced traffic.Speed ~awes Lane Are=_ I drop and potential accident reduction consiCerable. 51 Clackmannansnire 30- 21 I 0.8 0 21Ck Gateways anc cnicanes witn over-run areas for T;lliccultry buses. Mccerate cost with cor.s;Ceracle Croo;n Stalker Avenue I acc:cencs anc soeecs. 52 Devon 7CC0 7000 aC _C I C.2 C _2C'K To ca,m traffic at^ecestr;an crossing point usmc 6arnstacie I refuges. hamn,ncand coloured surfacing. Park Scnccl Reasonable cost with considerable sceed crco. i 53 Devon 6200 5500 34 24 6.6 to i _220k Series of flat:cc numos. sign cuality matena!s. Exeter street Ggnting. lancscaoinc. Reiatively expensive Burnthouse Lane but considerable accieent anc sceec reducacn i 54 Devon 7900 7000 33 25 e.7 G.3 °91k Fiat top numps.footwav extens;ons, protected Exmouth parking,mini roundabouts.Relatively expensive. Withycombe Considerable accident reduction anc significant Village Road speed crop. 55 Devon 3900 3300 37 32 5.3 3 =99k Narrowing,chicanes by widening footways and Plymouth planting features.Bus route.Reasonable cost. Beaumont Road Considerable accident and noticeable speed drop. 56 Devon 14000 14000 45 41 27 14 £12.6k A lane and hatch marking scheme to narrow Plymouth a dual carriageway and provide cycle lanes. Crownhill Road Lew cost and considerable accident drop. 57 Dumfries&Galloway 4000 4000 35 25 0.3 0 £36k Fiat top humps,narrowing.refuges,protected Dumfries parking.Bus route. Moderate cost. Considerable Calside Road speed drop. Potential hazards at schools. 1 F 9 3 Table 2.3 Residential Case Studies (cont) Case Traffic Speed Accidents Study Location volume mph pia pa Cost Comments(See Ncte 1,p.27) Before After Before After Before After E8 Essex 33 27 30 15 :77k Flat top narrowed humps, priority worxing,mini. Harlow Seme driver conflict. Mccerate cost. Significant ParringCon Road speed crop,consiceracle potential acc:cer,t crcc. 59 Essex 8700 3580 40 27 I G c46k An extensive scneme of round top road humps. Hacleigh I Reasoriable cost witr,,considerable sceeC Scrub Lane i reduction and cctential accident rec,, t=Cn. 60 London - - 36 31 .3k Low cost experimental installation cf tnermccias:,c Bexley rumble strips. Rejected by a majority of resicents Christchurch Rcac and suosequently removes at°%4k cost. I Glcucestersnire I ` _'G.Ek A series of road closures by feorvay extenscns to 1 Gloucester prevent Speeding and rat running.'Nice Kcal I Conduit Stree: succor,.Moderate cost. 1 62 Gwent _-_ 18 1 3^ C _ 20 0.7 0 =_5k An entry chicane Pius road humps arc narewir.c. Newport One-way street.Mccerate cost with consicerable Lanthewy Road speed drop. 63 Hertfordshire 720 270 44 18 5.4 C.5 _52k Rcunc and flat top humps, mini rouncacouts. Hemel Hemcst=_ac crcrity narrowing. Reasonable cost and Peascroft Road considerable accident and sceec reducticn. 61: LonCon 820 450 2C 7 0.i _7Ok SpeeC table.chicanes. viC;n restrictions. refuses Sh lfstan s Busn anc junction treatments. Reasonable cost with bVulfstan Street considerable speec and accident dreo. I I I 65 South Humoersice 16.7 7 E I °'22k Entry t,eatment. sceec tables arc mini round Grimsby I aceuts all in duaiitv suracing. Mccerate cost with. Grant ThoroiC Park I ' considerable accident reduction. 66 South Humbersice 2 c201k Environmental enhancement. Chicanes, refuces, Grimsby prctectec parking, mini rouncaceut. Relatively Nur,stnorbe Estate expensive but ccrisiceraoie acc:cent reeucdon. ISIe Of Wight I »83G 3 8G i I 3._ 7 _»Ck Numerous flat tcc rcad Humps, plateaus NewceR I incorocrating bus lay bys. Reasonable cost"VI'm Pan Estate i considerable acc:cent anc speed crop. it 68 Kent CEO EOG 39 29 - __3k SIccK pavec plateaus with narrowing features. I'I Sicnngcourne Mccerate cost with cons:cerabie accident anc it Stannope Avenue soeed reduction. L69 Kent 7CC0 6EC0 »» 37 2.7 1 _421k Unusual scneme of'build-cuts'and refuges to Tonbriege produce chicanes.Reasonable cost wiV^ncuceable Brook Street speed reducton and potential accicent reduction. 70 West Yorkshire 41-00 4000 39 24 7 1 _80k Formidable pinch points with speed cushions. Huddersfield Rumble strips. Relatively expensive but Victoria Road considerable accident and speed reduction. 71 West Yorkshire 5CC40 5CC0 35 22 3 0.4 Z30k Plateaus,themleplastic'thumps'.Lacer effective. Golcar Sus problems with plateau ramps.Relatively Sycamore Avenue expensive.Considerable accident and speed drop. 72 West Yorkshire 7CCC 55C0 35 24 a 0.5 E45k Unusual rounded rumble strips built despite Paddock traders and bus operators apposition. Moderate Church Street cost.Considerable speed and potential accident drop. 30 Case Traffic Speed Accidents Study Location volume mpn pia pa Cost Comments(See Note 1,p. 27) Before After Before After Before After 73 West Yorkshire 8500 6500 35 22 3.3 1 _30k A series of raised plateaus pius new street Ravensthorpe lighting.Relatively expensive but consiceracte North Road accident and speed Croo. 7, Staffordshire 3600 2800 39 29 2 1.2 _9.2k Round top humps. Low cost scheme- Featnerstene Considerable speed reduction.Some rerouting The Avenue has occurred. 75 Lancasnire 126CO - 3= 15 2.3 _39k Fiat top humps with narrowings and tcilares in Lancaster I high quality materials. Bus route. One-way streets. Primrose Area Reasonable cost and considerable weed drop. 76 Lancasnre H00 1750 35 3C 2.6 _47k Sligntly raised oincn points,chicane,rumcie area. Burniey I Relatively-expensive with Considerabie cotentiai 2rcugnam Street i accident reduction ane marginal sceeC droc. i 77 Manchester 29C0 1650 38 22 7.7 1 _70k Flat too numbs, narrowings and priority. Bus Woocsmcor route. Relatively exoersive.Considerable Speed Wccesmeor Lane droc and accident reduction potential. 7S Loncor. ;700 9C 28 C I _ 0 _;Ok An,jnusuai open road C:esure. Raisec deterrent Newnam surfacing to reinforce a!imiteC access restrcacn. Various roads Moderate Cost with a hign degree of comotiarce. 79 Oxforesrure 57CC 42CC 26 2 I _;7.5k A road numo scheme with 1:12 ramos on a'_us Savoury I route. Modest cost.Noticeabie speed crop. The Fairway Accident freouency up but no.cniic casualties. 80 Strathclyde 2800 1900 3C 18 2.7 as _15k Combination of chicanes.narrowings.'thumcs DrumcnapeI I and markinds. Moderate cost with cCnsiderabie Road Pee!Glen R speed droc and potential accident reduction. I Surrey 36'0 2=0 1 1 - 1.3 0 _35k I A series of,cunc top road humps.Moderate Cost G::Ildfv(d with cons;ceracte accident and Sceec crop. Cumceriarc Ave ..2 West YorxSnire 3CCO 27C0 38 30 I ? C.6 I _25k Rutcer kerCS anc tdllarcS for Cnicane system. Waxefie!d "Emergency services anC y bus route. Mddefate -CSi Cu _:izaoe n Rcac I with significant speed arec ane considerable potential accident reduction. E3 Surr-ey 6300 59C0 I 12 - _Bak I Secarate cycle track,chicanes(bus viais), refuces, protected oarxing. Relatively expensive. Alter,Drive I Sceec and accident drop considerable "See Case Study for details. as West Yorkshire 3000 2600 33 25 1 C.7 _13.5k Thermoolastic'thumps'to minimise effects on South Eimsall buses(special authorisation).Moderate cost. Ash Grove Noticeable speeC drop. Replacing with chicanes. a5 Wiltshire 4C00 4400 39 25 1.1 0 _22k Humps.cycle slips.May modify-noise complaints, Laverstock congestion.Fixing problems with rubber humps. Church Road Reasonable cost.Considerable speed drop. M , y 31 APPENDIX 3 NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC .CONTROL PROGRAM BROCHURE AND CITIZEN ACTION REQUEST FORM 17 Welcome to Kent's Neighborhood NEIGHBORHOO[I Traffic Control Program Traffic conditions on residential streets can greatly affect TRAFFIC CONTROL neighborhood livability. When our streets are sale and pleasant, the quality of life is enhanced. When traffic problems become a daily occurrence,our sense of community and personal well- being are threatened. With your help and the usage ens,t in education,engineering enforcement,and encouragement,these concerns can be addressed. Citizen involvement is an important part of all trff c calming projects. The people who live and work in the project area have the opportunity to become actively involved in the Planning and decision-making process. What is the Neighborhood Traffic Control Progam? The Neighborhood Traffic Control Program addresses neighbor- hood traffic safety concerns while partnering with citizens and/or community groups to become actively involved in the improve- ment process. Through active participation by you and your neighbors,we can identify the problem,plan the approach, implement the solutions,and evaluate the effecriveness. How does the program work? The program is a two year process. The first year focuses on passive, less-restrictive measures lice educational programs,enforcement, pavement legends,and signing Should Phase I actions prove me 13�. traffic ve at reducing excessive speeds or tc volumes,more re= ethods may be considers based on certain threshold criteria First Year—Phase I Educational,less-restrictive measures lel "`'- • Secon Year—Phase II ping to make T Physfical devices ieighborhoodr .V greets safer. CITY OF �� >r1 VrC'rA .••► Mayor Jim White CITY OF KENT TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT .hen does Phase H begin? ase 11 of the program begins approximately one year from the , •,plementation of the Phase 1 measures. We again,collect data compare it to the previous year's information. Should the ! ;t`•ic--nce.ns still exist and there is sufficient data to support --�— s, . the location will be reviewed for physical devices. -hat ty�es of physical devices are used in Phase II? ere a e many types of devices used-some of these devices ..elude: • Curb Extensions ` • Partial Closures * ' Brush Trims • Entry Treatments s,•.. = The trimming and or removal of brus;• • Speed Humps `+�lj �'�`+ by homeowners or City crews to allot • Traffic Circles better sight distance. • Medians Neighborhood Speed Watch Program This program allows citizens the oppor- tunity to check-out a radar unit and record the speeds of vehicles traveling in their neighborhood. The registered owners are identified(through the DMV) and sent a warning letter asking them to reduce their speeds. The letters are not violations,but reminde-s about the posted speed limit and the community's cone What is involved in Phase R of the prod? Each of these devices is unique and specific criteria has been established for when and where they may be used. Their Rumble Strips installation is determined by traffic engineering analysis and The installanon of 4"raised buttons placed in a design three main factors: sequence across the roadway,causing a vehicle to vibrate, alerting the motorist to an upcoming situation. These may • Volumes...between 300 and 3000 vehicles per day be used in conjunction with curves,crosswalks,pavement • Speeds...in excess of35 MPH(35%) legends,and speed limit sips. • Area topography Based on the data collected and the topography of the area,a device or combination of devices may be recommended. Of course,any recommended action will be based on sound ,waguteering and planning principles. Safety remains paramount matte decision-maldng process,including access for public safety vehicles. 1 Should a location proceed to Phase U,neighborhood meetings f _ are held and majority support(70%) is required before proceed- ing with construction of the physical device. T'S GET STARTED... se Fill out the enclosed Citizen Action Request(CAR)form,and be 7 "xs,.,. _ific when noting the location and times you are experiencing traffic or ry problems. In addition, look over the possible Phase I solutions ! `-` • :::.: ?e-x . 'bed below and let us know what you feel would be appropriate for your sborhood. When complete,mail the CAR to us to begin the process. We Forward to working with you in making your neighborhood streets safer. SSIBLE PHASE I SOLUTIONS 25i Speed Radar Trailer Board A portable trailer equipped with ,oue4v4 a radar unit which detects the speed of passing vehicles and displays it on a digital reader Neighborhood Traffic Safety Campaign board. This device shows This program involves a personalized ` drivers their"actual"speed newsletter mailed to your community. versus the posted speed limit and The newsletter explains volumes ana encourages their compliance. speeds in your area,recommended traffic calming measures,traffic laws, pedestrian safety,etc. Pavement Markings •.• • The painting of legends upon the pavement. •• These may include centerlines,fogtines. Target Enforcement school crossings,ands speed limits. Increased enforcement by p the Kent Police Department. Traffic section. Sinning The posting of appropriate traffic control 7SPEED signs. These may include speed limit, parking,dead-end,school signs,etc. mere could be many reasons. Some of the important ones may tv J .iclude: z, `� ( O • Vehicles traveling faster than the posted speed limit C • Non-local traffic usingthe neighborhood j o i7�Itborhood as a short cut J < Traffic accidents _ < 0 • Pedestrian and bicycle safety �q o � G -iow do we get started? "0 ° • Identify the traffic concerns in your neighborhoodCo Discuss possible solutions with your neighbors from w the measures fisted in this brochure t" n • Fill out the"Citizen Action Request"form,and mail back to us. How long until we hear about our recommendations and proposed solutions? Dnce the Citizen Action Request form is received,we review our concems and begin to collect data. We also conduct a field eview of the area. =rom this information,we compile a Proposed Improvement '[an for the location and inform you of our findings and -ecommendations of Phase I solutions. This review takes approximately 6 to 8 weeks from the date we receive your ::idzen Action Request form- Special thanks to the City of Bellevue for their permission to use this flyer Citizen Action Request Form for the Neighborhood Traffic Control Program Contact Name Day Phone Address Zip Code Concerned Location Neighborhood What concerns have you identified with the above location? Certain Times of the Day? I What solutions do you feel would address your concerns? (Check all that apply) Educational Measures Other Measures ❑ Neighborhood Speed Watch ❑ Brush Trims ❑ Traffic Safety Campaign Fj Signing Radar Speed Trailer ❑ Rumble Strips ❑ Enforcement ❑ Painted Legends Thank you for taking the time to fill out the Citizen Action Request From. Once we recieve the form, we will be contacting you with the Proposed Improvement Plan. Date Received Project Number Assigned Field Review ❑ Accidents ❑ Speeds ❑ Map ❑ Police N EP Area Proposed Improvement Plan Sent to Contact Person Comments / 11 Kent City Council Meeting Date July 6 , 1999 Category Consent Calendar 1 . SUBJECT: 272ND CORRIDOR INTERIM FINANCING - APPROVAL 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Approval and authorization of appro- priate budget changes for interim financing of the 272nd Corridor, as reflected in the memorandum of the Public Works Director dated June 21 , 1999, using the street fund balance with intent to issue bonds for the project at a later date . By deferring the formation of LID #351 to the beginning of next year, interim funding is necessary to pay for the work presently under contract . In addition, deferring the LID forced a review of the entire project budget forecast to determine what changes therein may also be necessary to either minimize the cash flow requirement or to address cost increases which would have otherwise been addressed via the regular budget cycle . 3 . EXHIBITS : Public Works Director Memorandum 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works/Planning Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc . ) 5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS : 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No . 6J DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS June 21, 1999 TO: Public Works/Plannin Committee FROM: Don Wickstro RE: 272°1 Corridor Interim Financing As vou're aware, by deferring the formation of LID# 351 to the beginning of next vear, interim funding is necessary to pay for the work presently under contract. In addition to deferring the LID forced us to review the entire project budget forecast (see table A) to determine what changes therein may also be necessary to either minimize the cash flow requirement or to address cost increases which would have otherwise been addressed via the regular budget cycle. As a result, we are proposing some mid year budget changes along with an interim financing proposal. In putting the 1999 budget together no street fund monies were allocated for this project in `99 as it was anticipated LID funds would be available. In fact no street fund monies were projected until 2002 for which S 1,221,071(see table B) was denoted therefore. Now to both minimize the cash floe- requirement and to address a project cost increase issue a budget change is necessary. The budget change we are proposing is to transfer 53,328,821 from the street fund in 1999 to the project fund (see table Q. Further, another S610,000 is projected for next Near (to be addressed the in regular budget cvvcle). The net total increase of street fund monies to the project fund is 52,717,750 (53,328,821 —, 5610,000 - S 1,221,07 1 = 52,717,750). Said increase costs can be attributed to basically 3 items: added on and off ramps at 108`h Avenue, bond issuance / Guarantee Fund costs and Grant fund reduction. The ramp costs added about a million dollars as it included not only the additional construction costs but also additional right of w•av expense plus walkway improvements along 108' Avenue to address the neighborhood's perceived safety issue relating to their kids walking to school there along. The bond/Guarantee fund issue added $1,146,820. To minimize the anguish of the LID participates we told them we would limit their assessment at the amount specified in the agreement where typically the LID expenses are added on top thereof. The Grant reduction amounts to about 5400,000 and it is attributed to how the grant agency calculates their share (Please keep in mind that we have not given up on getting this money but resolving it may only occur at the completion of the project.). Assuming the budget change is concurred with, the amount of the interim financing necessary to address the cash flow issue as reflected in table A is approximately S5,200,000. The size thereof is attributed to two factors: Prior carry-over work, and work moved ahead of schedule. Per the carry over work you may recall that last vear when we awarded the contract for constructing the bridges we anticipated a $1,000,000 short fall for which the LID funds were to cover. Per the moved ahead work we decided to do the work originally scheduled for 2002 ($1,221,0 7 1) this year. The original proposal was to build a three lane road this year to get the road open to traffic and then widen it to 5 lanes in 2002. Prior to letting the recent contract we reviewed that proposal and concluded it would probably be more costly to do so. We felt so because the contractor would be working under traffic conditions whereas now there is none and further, by 2002 there will be a lot of Ref. 49 work hitting the streets so competition (low prices) for our work may not be very good. To fund this financing need we are proposing to utilize the ending funding balance of the street fund. As reflected in table C the ending balancing is estimated to be approximately S5,573.762 by the end of 1999. This assumes the expenses as highlighted in table C (256`h Street Improvement, 212"' Street Rehab, West Meeker Street Widening and 132"d s: 272"d Street Intersection) are deferred to 2000 and that the monies therefore remain in the Street Fund (The delav of these projects was explained in my memo of June 7"). Further this assumes Council will concur with another budget change for the 196`h Corridor Project. The Change proposed (good news) is to reduce the 1999 street fund transfer thereto from S 1.503,171 to SO and the 2000 transfer which can wait for the 2000 budget cycle from $6,036,637 to S1,696.637 for a total net savings of S5,843,171. The base for the savings is a wind fall grant of almost S4,500,000 and a good bid on the recent bridgework. With all the above action the interim financing needs of the 272 Corridor are met. Use of the street fund monies for same has the added benefit of the project not incurring the interest expense (estimated at S500,000) associated with borrowing from other Funds such as Water Utility Capital Improvement Fund. Finally as a fail safe back up plan we are requesting that Council authorize the uses of other funds as necessary subject to an appropriate interest charge should the funds within the Street Fund prove to be inadequate. Please keep in mind that when the LID funds become available, all interim financing monies will be refunded accordingly. MOTION: Recommend to full the Council the approval and the adoption of the budget changes and respective transfers along with the concurrence and the establishment of the interim financing thereto as reflected in the above memo. 272Cunding-2 > .; C O Q n rr C cl W 00 1 N G l• c n r v O _C r L: at 23 O �" O O VCi z 00• (D .^_- •.� C ro Cu a N r, N Z y Ro RO C' r.icn t i ° C7 `y vi N oNj fJ1 N W N �O C J O O W J � O in J ^ ^ C 00 \C --- A ^ N C J � 00 O 1� w �n v, c �O `• y a r d O NJ A -w- IN 00 00 �_+ G� '✓, C C O C 00 c;, w • LaiC N O N O OND 0000 0 oc C O C c, c c J J WN C\ O N V W N r+ _. O C C C r O C C O -00 0 0 0 C Oc 000 � C O O C W W O O C w O O v J A N O O O v J oo O G1 C\ O p O O CDO O O C to f O v, LO O O C\ 1p — O O N CA 00 CJi A 00 l.n W N O v, O In A A O J A C O J �o O C1 O 00 C w Q, w iC O �] v O O �a O 00 O 00 O N O IC N N O CDJ A O ►+ J O N O 0C 00 0 0 CN w d W 00 Q) CD 1 00 TABLE B Street Fund-R-sed 8114198 (Without 228th Mitigation) �- 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 200J 2004 Revenue: Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax-Unrestricted 1090.340 1.112.147 1,134.290 1.157.078 1.180.220 1.203,824 1,227,900 Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax-Restricted 509,941 520,140 530,543 541.154 551,977 563.017 574,277 Motor Vehicle Registration Fee 528.456 539.025 549.806 560.902 572.018 583,458 595.127 Street Utility Funds: Water 59.135 60.318 72.033 90,850 82.467 64.115 85.798 Sewer 117.152 122.817 128.155 135.032 143,517 151.511 158.405 Drainage 70.022 70.372 70.724 71.078 71.433 71.790 72.149 Electric 7 54.571 723.730 749.278 775.729 791,243 507,088 823.209 Gas 203,720 13 t,398 134.024 136,704 139.438 142,227 145.072 Telephone 442.532 425.496 434,006 442.686 451,540 460.571 469.782 Garbage 128.834 106,915 tt2.725 118.009 123.9W 130.253 136.844 Total Street Utility Funds 1,775.966 1,64t,044 1,700.545 1,760.087 1.803,610 1.847,536 1.891.259 Sale of Properly 300.000 700.000 - Counalmadc Debt(256th Street Improvements) 2.000.000 Mitigation Payments(228th Comtlor) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Interest Income 1915.000 125.000 125.000 125,000 125.000 125,000 125.000 TOUT R-nue 4400.703 6.637.356 4.040,284 4,144,121 4,232.833 4.322.835 4q/3.563 Exoenses Comdor Projects: 24 272nd Comdor 3.201.750 0 0 0 1,221,071 11 196th Sir Wes[Comdor 13.105 1,503.171 0 0 0 16 t96In Slreal-Middle ComOa 306.120 0 6.036.617 0 0 25 228"Street Comdor 0 0 0 0 403.916 1.003.816 2.415,816 Total Comdor Projects 3,520.975 1.503.171 6.036,637 0 1.624.887 1.003,816 2.115.816 Anenals 240th Street Imorovements(116tlh-138eh) 0 Washington Avenue Widening 0 12 S.E.2560,Street Improvements(116t1-132nd) 2.000.000 Pacific Highway South HOV-Phase I 0 3 212th Street Pavement Rehabilitation 567,000 14 West Meeker Widening(WVH-64th) 175.000 72nd Avenue(19681-1941 h) 390,000 d 841h Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation 300.000 19 West Meeker Street Widening-Phase 1 109.000 657.000 26 Paafic Highway South HOV-Phase II 0 27 Military Road Improvements 150,000 28 Central Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation 375.000 Total Anenals 0 2.742.000 390.000 409.000 807.000 375,000 0 Intersection Imororements: James Street 8 Central Avenue Right Turn Lanes 450.000 11 132nd Avenue South 8 272nd Street 400,000 20 Military Road 8 Reih Road Intersection Improvement 450.000 21 941 South Q Canyon Drive TrnTic Signal 300.000 22 West Valley Highway 8 277th Intersection Improvement 250.000 23 Military Road 8 272nd Inlersecton Improvement 275.000 29 Miscellaneous Intersection Slgnali2ation 250.000 Total Intersection Improvements 450.000 400,000 0 1,275000 0 250.000 b Other Improvements: Street UOlity,Operations 112.870 116.813 120,894 125.118 129.488 134.011 138.693 Debt Service 468.768 462.113 382.945 381.477 378.682 380.898 373.719 240th Street Deot 133.000 133.000 133,000 :33,000 133,000 133.000 133.000 25fith Street Deof 135,000 196.184 196,184 196,184 196.184 196,184 I Asohall Ovenays 469888 442,000 460,000 478,000 497.000 517.000 538,000 4 Sidewalk Renadltbbon 8instababon 308,851 200,000 300.000 300,000 300.000 200.000 300000 7 Neignbomood Traffic Control 25000 25.000 25.000 25.000 25.000 25.000 6 Tmtoo Signal Controller Caoinel Replacements 40.000 20.000 40.000 40.000 42nd Avenue South Rec-mcbm 75.000 RTA Access tmpmvements 150.000 9 Citywide Guardrail 8 Safety Improvements 30.000 30.000 30.000 30.000 30,000 30.000 30,000 Canyon Onve Pedeswan 8 Bicycle Faakty 658.000 Traffic Master Computer Iran-nnect Extension I25.000 10 Bike Paths t00.000 I00,000 100.000 100.000 100,000 Commuter Shuttle 70,000 70.000 70,000 70.000 70,000 70.000 5 Street Lighting Wiring Upgrades 50.000 60,000 15 Road 8 Railroad Separation Study 100,000 20.000 I80.000 500.000 500,000 8 Traffic Signal Energy Conservation 25.000 25.000 25,000 2 Slurry Seal Program 50,000 50.000 50,000 50.000 75.000 75.000 Total Cher Inhomvemenh 2.671.377 1.9118.926 2.073.023 2.013.779 2.449,354 2.461,093 1.979,596 Total Expenses 6.642.352 .6.634.097 8.499.660 3.697.779 4.881.241 4,089.909 4.295.412 Change in Fund Balance .2.241,549 3.259 1.459.376 446,342 -648.408 232,926 118,151 Street Fund Balance: Unrestricted 306,665 Raemoted 942.196 Street Utility 25.838 Corridor Fund Balance IR lA) S.,S4.824 Tobl Ending Balance 6,629.573 4.387.874 4.391,133 -68.243 378.098 -270,310 J7,385 80.766 TABLE C .Street Ftaand J1nre(:. 1999 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Revenue Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax-Unrestricted 1.:38.917 1.161.695 1.184.929 1,208.628 1,232301 1,257.457 I.282.606 Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax-Restricted 532,415 543,063 553.924 565.002 576J02 587.318 599,595 Motor Vehicle Regisualion Fee 588.429 600.199 612,202 624,446 636.935 649.674 662,667 Street Utility Funds: Wrier 58.391 59.359 71.126 79.832 81.429 93.058 84,719 Scwcr 113.997 1 19.509 124.703 131,J95 139.652 147.431 154,139 Drainage 70.025 70.375 -0,727 71,081 71,436 71.793 72.152 Elcctnc 716.124 741,403 767,575 794.670 810,563 826.774 943.309 Gas 131.206 133.830 136.507 139.237 142.022 144.862 147,759 Telephone 487.340 497,097 507.029 517.170 527.513 538.063 549.324 Garbage 116.831 122.743 129.954 135.479 142.334 149.536 117.103 Total Street Uldily Funds 1,693.914 1.744.506 1.806.621 1.869.964 1.914.949 1.961.517 2.008.005 Sale of Property 600.000 300.000 100.000 Counilmatic Bond-256th Street 2,000,000 Interest Income 68.000 68.000 68.000 68.000 68.000 68.000 69,000 Total Revenue 6.621,675 4,417,462 4-325,676 4,334,940 4.428,987 4,524,476 4,620,863 Expenses Corridor Projects: 24 272nd Comdor 1.123.821 610,000 0 0 0 0 11 196th Street-West Comdor 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 196th Street-Middle Comdor 0 1.696.637 0 0 0 0 25 228th Street Corridor-West Comdor 0 0 0 201.908 501,003 1.207.909 25 2231h Street Corridor-East Comdor 0 0 0 201.908 501,908 1.207,908 Total Corridor Projects 3328.821 2306.637 0 ;03,816 1,003.316 2.415.316 0 Arterials: 240th Street Improvements(1 I61h-138th) 0 12 256ih Street Improvements(I 16(h-132nd) -2,000,000 Washington Avenue Widening 0 Pac10c Highway South NOV-Phase 1 0 3 212th Street Pavement Rehabilitation 567,000 14 Nest Meeker Widening fWVFI-641h) 175.000 17 Tnd Avenuc(1961h-194th)(1961h Middle Comdorl 390.000 13 84th Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation ;O0 000 19 West Meeker Street Widening-Phase I 109,000 657,000 26 Pacific Highway South HOV.Phase II 0 27 Miiirary Road Improvements I50 000 29 Cemrai Avenue Pavement Rehabilitatinn 375.000 Total Arterials 0 3,132.000 409.000 907.000 375,000 0 0 Inieneetion Imp roremenis: 13 132nd Avenue South&272nd Street ''400.000 20 Military Road&Reith Road Inersection Improvement 450.000 21 041h Avenue South 0,Canyon Drivc Trnnic 5ipnai 300.0110 _- %Yc,,Valley Highway&277th Inmrseumn Imprmcmcn, 2_sO.UIM 23 Military Road&272nd Inictseelinn Improvement 275.000 29 ,Miscellaneous Intersectinn S1 gnaliralinn 2500M Tnlal Iniersectinn Improvements 0 400.000 1,175.000 0 250.000 0 0 Other Improvements: Street Utility Operations 118.197 141.722 146.637 151.122 156.985 162.431 168.066 Debt Service 462.113 382,945 331.477 378.682 390.899 373,719 152.376 Parking Garage Debt Service 327.809 327.909 327.309 327.809 327.809 327.809 256th Street Debi 135.000 196.184 196,194 196.194 196.t84 196,184 Technology Plan 100.000 100.000 100.000 Street Striping Program 76.574 79.000 31.000 83.000 85.000 87.000 89.000 Street Tree Mainienanc,Program 167,187 122,000 126.000 129.000 132,000 136,000 139.000 Pavement Rating Survey 20.000 Misc Equipment 38.500 Portable Message Board 25.000 Equipment Rental 32.000 Freight Mobility Study 10.000 I Asphalt Overlays 442.000 460.000 479.000 497.000 517.000 538.000 560,000 4 Sidewalk Rehabilitation&Installation 100,000 300.000 300.000 300.000 300,000 3D0.D00 300,000 7 Neighborhood Traffic Control 75.000 75.000 75.000 75.000 75.000 75,000 75,000 6 Traffic Signal Controller Cabinet Replacements 20,000 40,000 40.000 9 Citywide Guardrail&Safety Improvements 30,000 30.000 30,000 30,000 30.000 30,000 30.000 Canyon Drive Pedestrian At Bicycle Facility 458.000 10 Bike Paths 100.000 100.000 100.000 100.000 100,000 100.000 100.000 Commuter Shuttle 70.(Nh0 45.00C 45.000 45.000. 45.000 45,000 45.000 - 5 Street Lighting Wiring Upgrades 60.000 60.000 15 Road&Railroad Separation Study 20.000 180,000 500.000 500.000 8 Tn(ic Signal Energy Conservation 25.000 25.000 25,000 2 Slurry Seal Program 50.000 30.000 50.000 50.000 75.000 75,000 75,000 Total Other Improvements 2.161571 3,011,476 2,562.107 2.903397 2.920.976 2.446.143 2,257,935 r Total Expenses 0 5.590.392 8,850,113 4,246,107 4.114.213 4549,692 4,861,959 2,257,935 Change in Fund Balance 1,031.283 (4,432.651) 79.569 220,727 (120,705) (337,483) 2362.928 Street Fund Balance: Unrestrcted 113.126 Restricted I,002.075 Street Utility 357,799 Corridor Fund Balancc(R I A) 3.069 490 Trial Fridine Ralance K Kent City Council Meeting Date July 6 , 1999 Category Consent Calendar 1 . SUBJECT: RIVERBEND GOLF COMPLEX OPERATIONAL OPTIONS - APPROVAL AND AUTHORIZATION 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Approval and authorization to reduce staffing levels as recommended by the Parks Director/Consultant and to not sell any portion of the golf complex except under the direction of the Council if the city is unable to meet the highest positive revenue benefit within 18 months (the highest revenue option will be implemented by the Mayor/City staff, as recommended by the consultant, Economic Research Associates page 11-7) ; authorization for the Mayor to implement the recommendation by the consultant which includes one of the following three : Facility Lease, Management Contract, and Golf Operations Concessions (City Operation is only an option if a short-term emergency exists whereby the city must operate the golf course until new management is secured) ; authorization for the Mayor to administer and manage all provisions of the Riverbend Golf Complex Management agreement with SSMD, and if the criteria herein are not met, the City Council will take the necessary actions to ensure proper operation of the golf course by the end of year 2000 . Recently the City of Kent conducted a consultants study on the future direction of the Riverbend Golf Complex. The report outlined: methods to reduce expenses, recommendations on revenue enhancements through contractual changes, and stated that the only viable sale of assets would be the Par 3 . Staff is currently working on the reduction of expenses by lowering staffing levels . Staff will be presenting a proposal to the represented staff prior to the Operations Committee meeting. Staff is also recommending that the Par 3 not be sold and staff begin irrigation improvements at the facility. Staff is further requesting authority to implement future changes to the operation that have a revenue benefit to the city and golf complex. 3 . EXHIBITS: Operation Options Outline and financial information 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Staff and Operations Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc . ) S . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS : 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 6K MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Jim White Kent City Council From: John Hodgso irector of Parks and Recreation Date: June 11 , 1999 Subject: Riverbend Expenses and Revenue Adjustments Enclosed are revenue and expense charts based on information provided in the Economics Research Associates report and adjusted based on proposed expense reductions. Page 1 = This is table V-5 of the ERA report that notes expenses if we do not make any changes to current operations. Page 2 = This is table V-5 adjusted by staff reductions and shifting to a municipal lease program for equipment. Page 3 = This is table V-5 adjusted by staff reductions, shifting to a municipal lease program for equipment and transfering a portion of debt service (commonly known as green space acquisition) to the Capital Improvement Program. Page 4 = This shows the current staffing levels and proposed staffing levels. Page 5 = These show 1998 and 1999 Revenue projections from the original SSMD Request for Proposal with adjustments for fee increases. Table V-5 RIVERBEND FIVE-YEAR REVENUE AND EXPENSE PROJECTIONS UNDER CURRENT OPERATIONS In Current $OOOs Actual Projected 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Rounds 18-Hole Course 65,901 67,000 69,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 9-Hole Par 3 47,615 50,000 50,000 50.000 50,000 50,000 Total 113,516 117,000 119,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 Revenue Greens Fees 18-Hole Course $1,211 $1,323 $1,403 $1,467 $1,511 S1,556 9-Hole Par 3 282 296 305 314 323 333 Practice Range 227 230 237 244 251 259 Miniature Golf 81 85 88 90 93 96 Golf Lessons 76 80 82 85 87 90 Pro Shop Merchandise 523 650 773 796 820 844 Food & Beverage 309 318 338 353 - 363 374 Cart Rentals 145 147 156 163 168 173 Club Rentals/Mist 52 40 41 42 44 45 Total Revenue $2,906 $3,170 S3,423 $3,554 $3.660 $3,770 Operating Expenses Course Maintenance Salaries& Benefits $595 S577 S595 $613 $631 S650 Services & Supplies 144 154 159 163 168 173 Utilities(net) 20 20 21 21 22 23 Equipment 94 110 114 117 120 124 Subtotal Maintenance S853 $862 $887 $914 $941 $970 Golf Operations SO SO $0 SO SO Clubhouse Undistributed' $45 S49 $50 $52 $53 S55 General &Administrative Mgmt/Contractor Fee Fixed Fee $473 S473 $473 $473 $473 5473 Greens Fees - - - - - Range - - Miniature Golf - - - Lessons 38 40 41 42 44 45 Merchandise 523 650 773 796 820 844 Food & Beverage 124 127 135 141 145 150 Cart/Club Rental 177 169 178 185 191 197 Mgmt/Contractor Fee $1,334 S1,458 $1,599 S1,637 $1,672 51,708 Otherz 20 22 23 24 24 25 City Allocations' 106 108 112 115 118 122 Subtotal G&A $1,460 S1,589 $1,734 $1,776 $1,815 $1,855 Course Capital Reserve` 1 95 103 107 110 113 Total Expenses S2,359 S2,594 $2,774 $2,848 $2,919 $2,992 Net Operating Income $547 $575 $649 $706 $741 $778 Less: Debt Service Direct $602 S617 $620 $617 $618 $622 Indirect 140 140 140 140 140 140 Subtotal Debt S742 $757 $760 $757 $758 S762 Cash Flow (S195) (S182) (S111) (S51) (S17) S16 'Facilities maintenance-interfund. 2Includes other admin services and charges; licenses, permits, dues & taxes; insurance. 3Includes administrative (payroll, attorney, acctg, etc)costs. 4Calculated at 3% of total revenue. Source: Economics Research Associates. 1 Table V-5 RIVERBEND FIVE-YEAR REVENUE AND EXPENSE PROJECTIONS With staff reductions,shifting to a municipal lease of equipment. :Nand transfer some"debt to the Capital Improvement Program .- _ _.._�._.��_.__..._..,��_..._..._..._...._.._ .__....-_ (In Current SOOOs)-- Actual Projected 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Rounds 18-Hole Course 65,901 67,000 69.000 70,000 70,000 70,000 9-Hole Par 3 47,615 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 Total 113,516 117,000 119,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 Revenue Greens Fees 18-Hole Course $1,211 S1,323 $1,403 $1,467 $1,511 $1,556 9-Hole Par 3 282 296 305 314 323 333 Practice Range 227 230 237 244 251 259 Miniature Golf 81 85 88 90 93 96 Golf Lessons 76 80 82 85 87 90 Pro Shop Merchandise 523 650 773 796 820 844 Food& Beverage 309 318 338 353 363 374 Cart Rentals 145 147 156 163 168 173 Club Rentals/Misc 52 40 41 42 44 45 Total Revenue $2,906 $3,170 $3,423 $3,554 $3,660 $3,770 Operating Expenses Course Maintenance Salaries&Benefits $595 $500 , ; $430. $477, $491 $506 Services&Supplies 144 154 159 163 168 173 Utilities(net) 20 20 21... 21 22 23 Equipment 94 70 44 70 85 85 Subtotal Maintenance $853 $744 $654 $731 $766 $787 Golf Operations SO SO $0 SO $0 Clubhouse Undistributed' $45 $49 S50 $52 $53 $55 General &Administrative Mgmt/Contractor Fee Fixed Fee $473 $473 $473 $473 $473 $473 Greens Fees - - - - - - Range - - - - - Miniature Golf - - - - - - Lessons 38 40 41 42 44 45 Merchandise 523 650 773 796 820 844 Food& Beverage 124 127 135 141 145 150 Cart/Club Rental 177 169 178 185 191 197 Mgmt/Contractor Fee $1,334 $1,458 $1,599 $1,637 $1,672 $1,708 Otherz 20 22 23 24 24 25 City Allocations' 106 108 112 115 118 122 Subtotal G&.A $1,460 $1,589 $1,734 $1,776 $1,815 $1,855 Course Capital Reserve =25 103 107 110 113 Total Expenses $2,359 1,$2,40T $2 539; $2,665_ $Z 744 ,:$2,809, Net Operating Income $547 $763. °$884 :;:`$8$9. $9I6 $961' Less: Debt Service Direct $602 $617 $620 $617 $618 S622 Indirect $140 -_'.$140: -$140, Subtotal Debt $742 $757 $760 $757. ' . $758 ;'$76Z Cash Flow ($195) $6 $124 $132 1 $158 $199. 'Facilities maintenance-interfund. Includes other admin services and charges'. licenses, permits, dues&taxes; insurance. 3Includes administrative(payroll, attorney, acctg, etc)costs. °Calculated at 3% of total revenue.(except 1999) Table V-5 RIVERBEND FIVE-YEAR REVENUE AND EXPENSE PROJECTIONS r With staff reductions,shiftmg to a munccipal lease R equipment,7, 7 and transfer some debt to the Ca`ital Im rovement Pro ram g (In Current$000s) Actual Projected 1998 1999 2000 1 2001 2002 2 003 Rounds 18-Hole Course 65,901 67,000 69,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 9-Hole Par 3 47,615 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 Total 113,516 117,000 119,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 Revenue Greens Fees 18-Hole Course $1,211 $1,323 $1,403 $1,467 $1,511 $1,556 9-Hole Par 3 282 296 305 314 323 333 Practice Range 227 230 237 244 251 259 Miniature Golf 81 85 88 90 93 96 Golf Lessons 76 80 82 85 87 90 Pro Shop Merchandise 523 650 773 796 820 844 Food & Beverage 309 318 338 353 363 374 Cart Rentals 145 147 156 163 168 173 Club Rentals/Misc 52 40 41 42 44 45 Total Revenue $2,906 $3,170 $3,423 $3,554 $3,660 $3,770 Operating Expenses Course Maintenance Salaries& Benefits $595 $500 $430 $477 $49I $506 Services&Supplies 144 154 159 163 168 173 Utilities(net) 20 20 21 21 22 23 Equipment 94 70 44 70 Subtotal Maintenance $853 $744 $654 $731 $766 $787 Golf Operations $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Clubhouse Undistributed' $45 $49 $50 $52 $53 $55 General &Administrative MgmUContractor Fee Fixed Fee $473 $473 $473 $473 $473 $473 Greens Fees - - _ _ _ Range _ Miniature Golf Lessons 38 40 41 42 44 45 Merchandise 523 650 773 796 820 844 Food & Beverage 124 127 135 141 145 150 Cart/Club Rental 177 169 178 185 191 197 MgmUContractor Fee $1,334 $1,458 $1,599 $1,637 $1,672 $1,708 Otherz 20 22 23 24 24 25 City Allocations3 106 108 112 115 118 122 Subtotal G&A $1,460 $1,589 $1,734 $1,776 $1,815 $1,855 Course Capital Reserve" _ 25, 103 107 110 113 Total Expenses $2,359 :$2,407 $2,539, 52,665 ,-$2,744 $2,809 Net Operating Income $547 .'$763 $884 . '$889 $916 -. . "$961: Less: Debt Service Direct $602 $617 $620 $617 $618 $622 Indirect 140 Subtotal Debt $742 '$617 -_ $620;- _ 4617 - Cash Flaw ($195) $146 $2'6-4 - $272 . 339 'Facilities maintenance-interfund. 2Includes other admin services and charges; licenses, permits, dues&taxes; insurance. 3Includes administrative (payroll, attorney, acctg, etc)costs. °Calculated at 3%of total revenue.(except 1999) Source: Economics Research Associates 3 Riverbev�d c,oL f cow,?Lex sta f f w,g Ad j kStvmv,-ts Salaries-and Benefits 1. Superintendent 2. Field Supervisor MW IV 3. Lead Worker MW III 4. Lead Worker MW Ill 5. Equipment Operator MW II 6. Reg. Part Time MW II 7. Reg. Part Time MW II 8. 8 Month Part Time 9. 8 Month Part Time 10. 8 Month Part Time 11 . 4 Month Part Time 12. 4 Month Part Time 13. 4 Month Part Time • Eliminate currently vacant MW II Full Time position • Eliminate currently vacant MW III Mechanics position • Reduce one current MW II Full Time to Regular Part time • Restructuring 4 and 8 Month pay scales • Maintenance and repairs of golf course equipment would be under the direction of the Golf Course Superintendent with work being performed by the Full Time staff members as part of a-job-sharing program. This system has been operating successfully for us over the past three months with no major equipment failures and preventative maintenance has been performed on a regular schedule interval. r 4 Riverbend Golf complex Revenue Information * 1998 Projected Revenue $3,237,300 1998 Actual $2,906,971 ($ 330,329) Difference * Includes 1997 RFP projections plus fee increases *} 1999 Projected Revenue $3,420,500 ($250,500) ***1999 Adjusted Revenue Projection $3,225,500 ($55,500) 1999 ERA consultant Revenue Projection $3,170,000 ** Includes 1998 projected plus fee increases (difference amount to ERA) *'Adjusted Revenue Projections by SSMD 1/99 (difference amount to ERA) 5 - K Kent City Council Meeting Date Julv 6 , 1999 Category Consent Calendar 1 . SUBJECT: RE-AWARD BID FOR REMOTE ACCESS - APPROVAL 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Award of the Remote Access Purchase and Implementation Project to Network Computing Architects (NCA) , as recommended by staff . On April 20, 1999, the Operations Committee recommended approval to the low bidder for the City ' s Remote Access and Implementation Project . The award was not successful . NCA submitted the next lowest bid and they have confirmed that their Purchase and Implementation Response to the City is still available . 3 . EXHIBITS: NCA' s Remote Access and Implementation Response 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Staff (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc . ) 5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $77 , 221 . 30 SOURCE OF FUNDS : Technology Plan 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No . 6L -,ATE: June 15 1�,99 TO: Council Ope;ations Committee FROM: Joseph Lorenz CC: Marty Mulholland Brent McFall RE: Bid Re-award for Remote Access Purchase and Implementation. BACKGROUND: On April 20, 1999 the Oper 3tions Committee recommend approval for the Remote Access and Implementation Project. The City has been negotiating with the vendor since Full Council Approval. On June 14, 1999 both parties concluded that mutual agreement was not obtainable. The vendor was notified through the City 3 consultants that the Remote Access Purchase and Implementation Project would be awarded to :he next lowest bidder. The next lowest bidder was Network Computing Architects. The City met with representatives from NCA on June 15, 1999 to discuss their response. NCA indicated that their response was still ---available and project work coulc start after receiving a fully executed Purchase and Implementation agreement from the City. RECOMMEND ACTION: Award the Remote Access RequEst for Quote to Network Computing Architects, Inc. in the amount of $77,221.30, for the design and 'mplementation of a 3Com Total Control Remote Access solution using Security Dynamics' Secure 10 technology, subject to City Attorney approval and the Mayor's signature. MOTION: Authorize the Mayor to sign a Remo-le Access Purchase and Implementation agreement with Network Computing Architects Incorporated in the amount of $77,221.30, subject to City Attorney approval. Thank you. Network Computing Architects, Inc. I I I I 10245 Main Street,Suite 14 Bellevue.WA 98004-610; 800 604-6536 425 451-8995 Phone 425 453-3461 Fax ;'larch 23, 1999 httpi/www.NCAnet.com City Clerk Remote Access Purchase and Implementation City of Kent 220 4's Avenue South Kent,WA 98032 Gentlemen and Ladies, On behalf of myself and Network Computing Architects, thank you for the opportunity to support the deployment of secure remote access for the City of Kent!This cover page is a summary of the project costs which are detailed in the body of the Request for Quote. First you will see two total project costs: one for the RFQ as written, and one modified to provide a greater degree of redundancy. I have followed this with maintenance costs to support the system in years two and three of deployment. The total cost for the remote access system as specified by the RFQ will be$77,221.30. In order to have redundancy in both components of the system I have generated a cost number which incorporates a multiple server version of the Security Dynamics ACE/SERVER, Security Dynamics RADIUS option,and on-site spares for the 3Com Total Control remote access platform. The total cost of this system will be$116,478.35. Cost of system maintenance in year 2 will be $12,054.60 Cost of system maintenance in year 3 will be $12,054.60 1 will be happy to answer any questions you may have regarding this response to the request for quote. You can reach me direct at 425-452-5184, or by e-mail at ephillips@ncanet.com. Again, thank you for the opportunity to support the City of Kent. We appreciate your business! Sincerely, r r Eric Phillips Account Executive NCA, Inc. Strategic Partner for 11111."WESr' Arizona Califcmia Florida Idaho llinris 0 i 5 APPENDIX B - VENDOR RESPONSES i VENDOR Response Letter 3/23/99 Eric Phillips Account Executive Network Computing Architects 10245 Main Street Suite 14-3 Bellevue, WA 98004 Dear Mr. Nicksic: Please find enclosed our response to the City of Kent's Request for Quote (RFQ) for the Purchase and Implementation of 3Com Total Control Remote Access and Security Dynamics Authentication Ace/Server and related services dated February 10, 1999. We have reviewed the RFQ and responded to all sections as directed in the RFQ. We look forward to the opportunity to provide and implement an excellent remote access solution to the City of Kent using 3Com Total Control in conjunction with Security Dynamics' ACE/Server. Sincerely r Eric Phillips Account Executive 425-452-5184 425-453-3461 ephillips@ncanet.com Enclosures VENDOR Authorization and Binding I, Eric Phillips, certify that Network Computing Architects has reviewed the City of Kent's Request for Purchase and Implementation of 3Com Total Control Remote Access and Security Dynamics Authentication Ace/Server related services dated February 10, 1999, and responded to all required sections as directed in the RFQ. This quote constitutes Network Computing Architects's response to the City of Kent's RFQ. I further certify that I am authorized to negotiate for and contractually bind Network Computing Architects in all discussions with the City of Kent for the Purchase and Implementation of 3Com Total Control Remote Access and Security Dynamics Authentication Ace/Server. All contact with Network Computing Architects should be directed to: Name Eric Phillips Title Account Executive Address 10245 Main Street Suite 14-3 Bellevue. WA 98004 Telephone 425-452-5184 Fax 425-453-3461 Email —ephillips@ncanet.com Signed : Date: 3/23/99 Title Account Executive Corporate Seal: 3 Reference#1 (Installation must have been completed after August 1997) Organization BScivare Name Beau Mondav Title Network Administrator Address 3633 136`h Place SE Suite 100 Bellevue. WA 98006 Telephones 425-519-5900 Fax- 425-519-5999 Population 200 Installation Date: 3/26/97 Expanded 1/28/98 Number of Systems Date Application Operational Operational 3Com's Total Control With Edge Server With Network Control With Terminal Server 1 3/26/97 Security Dynamic's ACE/Server 1 3/26/97 With Redundant Server Working on 3Com Edge Server Both products working together. Yes 4 Reference#2 (Installation must have been completed after August 1997) Organization Montana Power Company Name Sean Cleverly Title Network Administrator Address 5155 Harrison Avenue Butte. MT 59701 Telephones 406-723-5421 Fax- 406-497-2960 Population 50 Installation Date: 12/18/96 Upgraded 9/11/97 Application Number of Systems Date Operational Operational 3Com's Total Control 1 12/18/96 With Edge Server With Network Control 1 With Terminal Server 1 Security Dynamic's ACE/Server 1 With Redundant Server Working on 3Com Edge Server Both products working together. Yes 5 Reference # 3 (Installation must have been completed after August 1997) Organization BFC Inc. GetSmart Name Dave Chamberlain Title Network Manager Address 1412 Chapin Avenue Suite 200 Burlingame, CA 94010 Telephones 650-524-1805 Fax- 650-524-1825 Population 50 Installation Date: l l/1/98 Application Number of Systems Date Operational Operational 3Com's Total Control With Edge Server With Network Control With Terminal Server Security Dynamic's ACE/Server 1 11/1/98 With Redundant Server Yes Working on 3Com Edge Server Both products working together. No 6 Reference#4 Organization Pemco Name Mark Tucker Title Contracts Administrator Address 325 Eastlake Avenue E Seattle. WA 98109 Telephones 206-628-4000 Fax- 206-628-4620 Population 250 Installation Date: 4/14/97 Expanded 1/21/99 Number of Systems -Date Application y Operational Operational 3Com's Total Control With Edge Server With Network Control With Terminal Server Security Dynamic's ACE/Server 1 4/14/97 With Redundant Server yes Working on 3Com Edge Server Both products working together. no 7 Staff Member#1 Name Jeff Rowlev Title Systems Engineer Address 10245 Main Street Suite 14-3 Bellevue. WA 98004 Telephone 425-451-8995 Fax 425-453-3461 Email irowley@ncanet.com Qualifications : CNE, Cisco IOS Certification, 3Com Total Control trained installer, Qualified Win NT/95 system administrator. NOTE: The City expects Staff Qualifications to be for those employees who actually will be doing the onsite work during the installation. Staff Member#2 Name Bob Fitton Title Senior Systems Engineer Address Same as above Telephone 425-451-8995 Fax 425-453-3461 Email bfitton@ncanet.com Qualifications : Network problem diagnosis (routing and congestion problems) Installation services (firewalls, routers, access servers, switches) Creation of security and performance packet filters (access lists) NOTE: The City expects Staff Qualifications to be for those employees who actually will be doing the onsite work during the installation. 8 Staff Member #3 Name Doug Hamilla Title Senior Systems Engineer Address : 10245 Main Street Suite 14-3 Bellevue, WA 98004 Telephone 425-451-8995 Fax 425-453-3461 Email dhamilla@ncanet.com Qualifications : MCSE, CNE, Network Design, Project Management NOTE: The City expects Staff Qualifications to be for those employees who actually will be doing the onsite work during the installation. 9 Support Services Personnel Name Eric Phillips Title Account Executive Address 10245 Main Street Suite 14-3 Bellevue, WA 98004 Telephone 425-452-5184 Fax 425-453-3461 Email ephillips@ncanet.com Name Susan Sison Title Credit Manager Address Same as above Telephone 425-452-5186 Fax 425-453-3461 Email : ssison@ncanet.com Name Kara Mcheng Title Accounts Receivabie Address Same as above Telephone 425-452-5183 Fax 425-453-3461 Email kmchenry@ncanet.com 10 Maintenance Process Describe your support services process. Hardware support is available under the service contract provided with the 3Com Total Control product. City of Kent administrator will have direct phone access to 3Com on a 24X7 basis. Advance replacement of hardware will also take place direct through 3Com and will be shipped ovemight/next business day. Onsite support for both 3Com Total Control Hub and Security Dynamics ACE/Server are contractable and available from 3Com through Network Computing Architects. Response time for onsite support is a maximum of 4 hours, 24 hours per day, 7 days per week. Describe your emergency response process. See above for business day emergencies. For hardware emergencies during non-working hours see above process. Onsite support for both 3Com Total Control Hub and Security Dynamics ACE/Server are contractable and available from3Com through Network Computing Architects. Response time for onsite support is a maximum of 4 hours, 24 hours per day, 7 days per week. 11 Year 2000 Compliance Statement I, Eric Phillips, certify that all systems and services proposed in this response to the City of Kent's Request for Quote for the Purchase and Implementation of Remote Access and related services dated October 1, 1998, are Year 2000 compliant as described in the following definition. The computer hardware, software and embedded systems will accurately store, process and report data before, during and beyond the year 2000. The standards by which this compliance is judged include: Century Compliant: The system will accurately process data and perform calculations based on dates. Common calculations include subtraction, sorting, and comparative operations. Leap Year Compliant: The system will accurately process data and perform calculations based on all valid leap years. February 29, 2000, is a rare century leap year, and all systems will recognize and correctly process this date. Interface Compliant: Connected systems will accurately share data with other systems as designed. Common formats and protocols will be implemented between connected systems to ensure all data is processed including dates. Projections and Analysis: The system will correctly perform all processes across the year 2000 boundary in both directions. This means that all functions and reports will perform correctly looking forward for projections as well as backward for functions such as trend analysis. Signed : Date: 3/23/99 Title Account Executive 12 VENDOR Experience 1. How many 3Com Total Control System designs and Installations has your company completed? 25 2. How many Security Dynamics Designs and Installations has your company completed? 6 For Questions 3 —9 please describe your experience with: 3. Implementing Kom's Total Control access products using ISDN PRI to allow ISDN 128K and analog 56K connections? We have worked with numerous internet service providers to provision analog, digital, and ISDN access through Total Control products. 4. Implementing Kom's Total Control with Security Dynamics ACE Server providing authentication. See references. The Bsquare Company of Bellevue, Washington and the Montana Power Company of Butte, Montana currently have NCA-deployed systems in place. 5. Implementing Security Dynamics Ace/Server running on a 3Com Edge Server and a backup server running on a UNIX Host or a Windows NT server. None 13 6. Providing End User Training Material as it relates to: • Setting up DUN on a home computer. • Using Security Dynamics Secure ID Cards. (General Use). • Instructor and Student Training Manuals. We provide our clients with training materials supplied by our manufacturers. Any additional materials needed will be supplied by Network Computing Architects professional services group. 7. Limiting downtime to accommodate 7x24 access requirements? Network Computing Architects will recommend redundant systems with automated fail- over to support 24 hour access to the network. NCA can provide on-site spares (see optional equipment list). 8. Working with the current major release of Security Dynamics ACE/SERVER Software. All Security Dynamics ACE/SERVER deployments by Network Computing Architects are currently updated to the latest major release. 9. Working with the current major release of 3Com's Net Management Software. Network Computing Architects standard procedure is to work with the latest current major release from all vendors, except where specified by the client. 10. What hours, in Pacific Time, is your customer service function open and available to resolve problems and answer questions? Network Computing Architects will contract with 3Com to provide the City of Kent 24 hour access to customer service. 14 11. Do you have an 800 number for customer service? Yes X No _. Do you offer technical assistance over the Internet? Yes X No _. How quickly do you require customer service staff to respond to an initial telephone call? Manufacturers support agreement offers 4 hour response via 800 number. 12. How many full-time staff do you have dedicated to your customer service function (not including any staff that performs other duties as well)? 5 13. What is the turnover ratio for your staff in the last 12 months? Please express in percentage. This is due primarily to the addition of new staff members and locations, rather than attrition. 14. The City intends to be live on all of its applications by April 1999. If you were selected by March 12, 1999, and expected to provide all implementation for the City of Kent, would you be able to accomplish the system integration by May 15 1999? If not, please outline alternatives for the City. Yes 15. How many 3Com Total Control System designs and Installations has your company completed? 25 15 16. How many sites has your company serviced where NT was running on a 3Com Edge Server. 10 17. Is the staff person working with the 3Com Edge Server certified in Windows NT 4.0? Yes 18. How many remote access systems has your company successfully implemented? How many systems has your company successfully implemented using Total Control? More than 100, 25 with Total Control. 19. Please attach or include any relevant additional information here. Network Computing Architects has focused as a company on enabling remote access for over 6 years. Among our clients are the majority of internet service providers in the Pacific Northwest. Also among our major clients are the City of Bellevue, Washington and the Cities of Portland and Hillsboro, Oregon. 16 Subcontractor Identification#1 Organization 3Com Corporation Organization Contact Steve Carroll Contact's Title Sales Account Manager Address 10900 NE 8`h Suite 900 Bellevue. WA 98004 Telephones 425-455-8530 Fax- Pager- other 425-454-7402 Email steve—carroll@3com.com Description of Subcontractor's duties while performing work for the City of Kent: 24 hour phone and onsite technical support available 7 days per week. Maximum 4 hour response time for on-site emergency support. Subcontractor Identification#2 Organization None Organization Contact Contact's Title Address Telephones Fax- Pager- other Email Description of Subcontractor's duties while performing work for the City of Kent: 17 Cost Summary Provide information about the cost of the proposed solution. Include the following in the cost breakdown: What are the 3Com Hardware costs? What is the 3Com system installation cost? What are the Secure ID System costs? Security Dynamics Ace/Server Security Dynamics Secure ID. What are the Secure ID System installation costs? What is the ongoing Maintenance costs First Year(We anticipate year I costs will be less because of the manufacture's warranty.) Second Year Third Year What are the System Administration Training costs? What are the User Training Program costs? Other hardware costs associated with your implementation. Sales tax which is currently 8.6 percent. Please present the above information in a form similar to these below: 3Com Description Total 3COM Total Control Chassis #003458-0 $6,520.00 3COM HiPerARC Gateway Card#002106-0 $7,660.00 3COM Hi Per DSP Module #002092-0 $8,740.00 3COM TCM Total Control Manager#00109 L 0 $1,650.00 Installation $0.00 Expenses — Premium On-Site 24X7X4 Maintenance— 1 Year $6024.00 Taxes 8.6% $2,631.08 Total Design Costs $1,200.00 Total 3Com Costs $34,425.08 18 Securitv Dvnamics Description Total ACE/Server#ACM9401-V3.XSD $16,165.00 Key Fob Tokens (quantity 250) #SD6006-60-48C $18,187.50 Secure Care Plus Maintenance $2,986.20 Expenses $0.00 Taxes 8.6% $2,954.32 Total Design Costs $1,200.00 Total Security Dynamics Costs $41,493.02 Training Description Total First Time Setup Instructions for Windows 95198 Included Remote Access Training Manual Included System Administrator Maintenance Manual Included a Expenses $1200.00 Taxes 8.6% $ 103.20 Total Training Costs $1303.20 Additional Optional Hardware Description Unit Cost Total Security Dynamics ACE/SERVER $32,553.00 $32,553.00 3.1 for NT Multiserver License (Required for redundancy) 1-250 User, w/ SecureCare Plus Maintenence Security Dynamics RADIUS Option $6,820.00 $6,820.00 (Multiserver) 3COM HiPerARC Gateway Card $7,660.00 $7,660.00 #002106-0 3COM Hi Per DSP Module $8,740.00 $8,740.00 #002092-0 19 3Com Spare AC Power Supply 130A S 1,595 S 1,595 #001402-0 Taxes 8.6% S4,933.65 Total Hardware Costs $62,301.65 20 Certification of Quote I, Eric Phillips, certify that the pricing provided in this quote will remain in effect for 120 days after the quote due date. 4;Signed : Date: 3/23/99 I Title Account Executive 21 City of Kent EEO Policy Declaration CITY OF KENT EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY :POLICY DECLARATION The City of Kent is committed to conform to Federal and State laws regarding equal opportunity. As such all contractors, subcontractors and suppliers wo perform work for the City shall comply with the regulations of the City's equal employmen= opportunity policies. The following questions specifically identify the requirements the City deems necessary for any contractor, subcontractor or supplier to adhere to. An affirmative response is required on all of the following questions. The questions are as follows: 1. I have read the attached City of Kent administrative policy number 1.2. 2. [VENDOR Name] does not and will not discriminate in employment on the basis of sex, race, color, national origin, age, or the presence of any sensory, mental, or physical disability. 3. [VENDOR Name] provides a written statement to all : ew employees and subcontractors indicating commitment as an equal opportunity employ:,r. 4. [VENDOR Name] actively considers hiring and promot.on of women and minorities. 5. The requirements outlined in this adherence statement s`iall be complied with prior to the execution of any contract between [VENDOR Name] an i the City. By signing below, [VENDOR Name] agrees to fulfill the five requirements referenced above. Dated the day of I ! <8. q �' r l c By For 9 --(_Qy� 0 ( �4 Title : -A L&ouo\h— 1 Date 2 1 22 6 APPENDIX C - ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY CITY OF KENT ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY NUMBER: 1.2 EFFECTIVE DATE: January 1, 1998 SUBJECT: MINORITY AND WOMEN SUPERSEDES: April 1, 1996 CONTRACTORS APPROVED BY: Jim White, Mayor POLICY: Equal employment opportunity requirements for the City of Kent will conform to federal and state laws. All contractors, subcontractors and suppliers of the City must guarantee equal employment opportunity within their organization and, if holding contracts with the City amounting to $10,000, or more wi_hin any given year, must take the following affirmative steps: 1. Provide a written stater.ient to all new employees and subcontractors indicating commitment as an equal opportunity employer. 2. Actively consider for promotion and advancement available minorities and women. Any contractor, subcontractor, consultant or supplier who willfully disregards the City's nondiscrimination and equal opportunity requirements shall be considered in breach of contract and subject to suspension or teimination for all or part of the contract. Contract Compliance Officers will be appointed by the Directors of Information Services to assume the following duties for their respective departments. 1. Ensuring that contractors, subcontractors, consultants, and suppliers subject to these regulations are familiar with the regulations and the City's equal employment opportunity policy. 2. Monitoring to assure adherence to federal, state, and local laws, policies, and guidelines. 23 Kent City Council Meeting Date July 6 , 1999 Category Consent Calendar 1 . SUBJECT: FOXHALL SHORT PLAT SUBDIVISION - BILL OF SALE 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works Director, acceptance of the Bill of Sale for the Foxhall Short Plat Subdivision submitted by Suncrest Homes, Inc . for continuous operation and maintenance of 185 feet of street improvements and 185 feet of storm sewers and, release of bonds after the expiration period. The project is located at 27313 135th Avenue S .E. 3 . EXHIBITS: Vicinity Map 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Director (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 6M D / i AYM I � 35 AY hl Q�I a '7V ; o �I W F a .yN•v SI, AV cc r r d tEt 33AY2tl 3S"1 ld kt IV / r � � 33 AY[Ll >H Z 3S ld Li4 � Y / c «t - 33 AYOEt V - •331•Ll • � b (l AY I l PLL• n Sy D r— _ ID / 2 3SAV L 3SAYPL4 l 3SnYW4 3SAV Wl 1 �vt /( w 35 AY Wl (I(J/ 3SAYW4 z 3S AY M, Kent City Council Meeting Date July 6 , 1999 Category Consent Calendar 1 . SUBJECT: MARINA POINTE TWO CONDOMINIUMS - BILL OF SALE 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works Director, acceptance of the Bill of Sale for Marina Pointe Two Condominiums submitted by Marina Point II L.L.C. for continuous operation and maintenance of 2, 044 feet of watermain, 1, 698 feet of sanitary sewer, and 1, 934 feet of storm sewers and, release of bonds after the expiration period. The project is located at 5200 234th South Place. 3 . EXHIBITS: Vicinity Map 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Director (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc . ) 5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS : 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION• Council Agenda Item No. 6N All ... It Asia Q .■■ ows ON 1 ! : 1111ZMM43 somemoop s■ ♦ Z ♦ .� mm 4& r � ;� ��♦ I♦ ®\� 58P S 40 �IgIAKLIW W Now _ US 'M: �.ED owl .A• e mv am — mum man 004A tMOA I— ■ No wpm ko law co Mae Id 1W 68 A MINOR �) ® l% CO CD i Kent City Council Meeting Date July 6 , 1999 Category Consent Calendar 1 . SUBJECT: PROMENADE TWO CONDOMINIUMS - BILL OF SALE 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works Director, acceptance of the Bill of Sale for Promenade Two Condominiums submitted by Promenade II L.L. C. for continuous operation and maintenance of 977 feet of watermains, 959 feet of sanitary sewer, and, release of bonds after the expiration period. The project is located south of S . 228th Street between 53rd Place South and Lakeside Blvd. East . 3 . EXHIBITS: Vicinity Map 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Director (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 60 G Z ER RD (� A y ;was • ° •r1•• •�►s YiAvg�� i r•:. v� N •r. * OWN W� awe 5 S■W W am* ® , � '�nr 54 AV S do m IN 10 ®®. D 10 . O Zip IIII 10 igloo �: a ♦ f or `MI INK w"m am ME am ps "MAKLm vs so* 68 AV ® CD — N c 0 Kent City Council Meeting Date July 6, 1999 Category Consent Calendar 1 . SUBJECT: VILLAGE ONE CONDOMINIUMS - BILL OF SALE 2 . SUbSIARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works Director, acceptance of the Bill of Sale for Village One Condominiums submitted by Village I L.L.C. for continuous operation and maintenance of 2 , 982 feet of watermain, 2 , 513 feet of sanitary sewer and 1, 609 feet of storm sewer and, release of bonds after the expiration period. The project is located in the vicinity of 53rd Place South, south of 228th Street . 3 . EXHIBITS: Vicinity Map 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Director (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS : 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 6P li c z ON sa+40 ■.■ pie \._.._ �A a use*414 ° C ■■Off:_►� �*goORB •C� r 0 OEM ■ �� N M � ■ ■am■ ■ � 5 S■WW ■■* sw All bm 4111 ° dv' �•"r `r r i I �► ® ~♦ fir\ ��r.�� +� � �� #► 'R. ♦ 0s Now ow nn ■ia dam r-- Id ® ■�� .00 r C c 0 WI Kent City Council Meeting Date July 6 , 1999 Category Consent Calendar 1 . SUBJECT: VILLAGE TWO CONDOMINIUMS - BILL OF SALE 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works Director, acceptance of the Bill of Sale for Village Two Condominiums submitted by Village II L.L.C. for continuous operation and maintenance of 1, 218 feet of watermain, 808 feet of sanitary sewer and 783 feet of storm sewer and, release of bonds after the expiration period. The project is located in the vicinity of S . 228th Street and Lakeside Blvd. East . 3 . EXHIBITS: Vicinity Map 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Director (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS : 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 6Q y _ - tn -- 40 ft Now i use ■ ■ a■■ so r: .■ � Io6 ! E ��.'�i .... r s■W W ... 54AVS dm ,•.® �''� ®i o� a ® '-"� �- •® • �� a ♦. ..,, �►*�� • . �i Oa ;i� 1+ � , ® J 7 58P S • e 40 IN Mo �.= ® �� , �•�` ire w 1, :1� ' t �� +sue• r �b®® gMAK I®E sME cn 1� N iir imp ME! Id W cn ----� I— ■ I ® � N ® i all �. Kent City Council Meeting Date July 6, 1999 Category Other Business 1 . SUBJECT: 125TH PLACE SE STREET VACATION 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: The Council held its public hearing on this matter at its June -15, public meeting. After closing the Public Hearing, Council tabled the issue and asked that this item be discussed at this meeting. Staff is available to address any specific issues council wishes to discuss . 3 . EXHIBITS: Planning Dept . memo of 6/15/99 and map 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works/Planning Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc . ) 5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS : 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember &AAk moveW, Councilmember seconds( to the Planning Director' s recom- mendation to approve with conditions the application to vacate a portion of 125th Place SE, a dedicated, unopened street, lying immediately north of SE 270th Street, as referenced in Resolution No. 1538; and to direct the City Attorney to prepare the necessary ordinance upon compliance with the conditions of approval , which conditions shall include without limitation reserving to the satisfaction of the Public Works Director, the necessary utility and construction easements over the northern portion of the property as requested by the Public Works Director at the June 15th hearing. DISCUSSION: ACTION: ✓Y)2 ��s� Council Agenda Item No. 7A CITY Of Jim White, Mayor I;rV[CTA P!annlm_ Department (25'3) 556-5454,FAX (253) 856-6-454 lames P. Harris. Plannlms Director PLAN_NIING DEPARTMENT MEN� 1ORAN_DU'1 June 15, 1999 NIELIO TO: MAYOR RIM WHITE AND CITY COUNCIL i'vIEVIBERS FROM: JAMES P. HARRIS, PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: REPORT AND RECOMMENTI)ATION ON AN APPLICATION TO VACATE A PORTION OF 125" PLACE S.E.— STV-99-1 RECO.NMNIENDATION: APPROVAL, WITH CONDITIONS I. Name of Applicant Donna Youn- 1?32'-1 S.E. 270" Street Kent. WA 98031 Phone: (253) 631-9202 1j. Reason for Requesting Vacation The applicant states, "The above named street has been maintained by the property owners since the houses have been built. This will never be a through street because of the Class I wetlands it runs into." III. Back�_Xrotind The wetland mentioned by the applicant, lies north of the proposed street vacation and east of 124" Avenue S.E. and south of Kent Kanglev Road. This is an extensive wetland that cannot be developed in the future. In 1997 the Citv_ Council zoned the area lvinc, on the east ed,ze of the wetland Professional and Office. "11.ith A ENUE SOUTH KE`T.WASHINGTON yn.M_-;895 PROPOSED STREET VACATION STV-99- 1 ' 125TH PLACE S.E. 'I N t" a _ SEE ENL N �QV �S57'34'08"E 1775 S.F. S�7'34'08"E- 2 4'08"E 10 08 03 -� 88.82' J .16' 4-- - _ 1792 S.F. I'll 1621 S.. 2 i S.F. I 2572 S.F. Y2��.,". r--- ` -30B _TEWPCRARY ASEMENT" - -- f "E ' W 49'43 4, ' & 1 �� U 6 7 f TITLE NO. ' 32512D-18 TITLE NO. TITLE N0. �/ �� r-1 TI J25121 -19 325122-20 3 T12508 -ul2524 f ASEMENT PERMAVENT . �D �' r _ . . .. . . . . .. .. . _ . .. . . .. . . ... . ... . . LJ I TI ON <8> ., 4W Kent City Council Meeting Date July 6, 1999 Category Other Business 1 . SUBJECT: COUNCIL MEETING DATE CHANGE - ORDINANCE 2 . SLTMKARY STATEMENT: Regular meetings of the City Council are currently held on the first and third Tuesday of each month, except for the month of December in which there is only one Council meeting held on the second Tuesday during that month. The current schedule often creates conflicts with other official functions of Council members . By changing the regular Council meetings to the second and fourth Tuesday of each month, these conflicts would be minimized. Under the proposed ordinance, the one Council meeting scheduled in December would remain scheduled for the second Tuesday of the month. 3 . EXHIBITS: Ordinance 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc . ) 5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS : 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember 0-,�M moveaf, Councilmember 4Z& 4Za,, seconder) to adopt Ordinance No. 3414(_ changing the dates of regular Council meetings to the second and fourth Tuesday of each month. DISCUSSION: `? /J ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 7B ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, amending Chapter 2.01 of the Kent City Code relating to City Council meetings by changing the date of regular council meetings from the first and third Tuesday of each month to the second and fourth Tuesday of each month. WHEREAS,the currently established days for regular meetings of the city council are the first and third Tuesday of each month; and WHEREAS, these days are often in conflict with other official functions of city council members; and WHEREAS, changing the days of regular city council meetings to the second and fourth Tuesday of each month minimizes these conflicts;NOW THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Chapter 2.01 of the Kent City Code entitled"City Council" is hereby amended by amending Section 2.01.020 as follows: Sec. 2.01.020. City council meetings. The regular and other meetings of the city council shall be held in the council chambers at the city hall unless otherwise designated by majority of the city council at a regular or special meeting. The regular 1 City Council Meeting Schedule meetings shall be held on the feet second and t#44 fourth Tuesday of each month except that during the month of December of each year, there shall be only one (1) regular council meeting to be held on the second Tuesday of said month. Special meetings shall be held as provided by law at such times as may be designated. Regular meetings shall convene at 7:00 p.m. If any such day of a regular meeting is a legal holiday, the meeting shall be held on the next business day at the same hour. SECTION2. Severability. If any one or more sections, subsections, or sentences of this Ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 3. f fective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force five (5) days from and after the date of publication as provided by law. JIM WHITE, MAYOR ATTEST: BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: ROGER A. LUBOVICH, CITY ATTORNEY 2 City Council Meeting Schedule PASSED: day of , 1999. APPROVED: day of 11999. PUBLISHED: day of 51999. I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No. , passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the City of Kent as hereon indicated. (SEAL) BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK P.\Civil\OrdinancetC itvCouncilMeetings.doc 3 City Council Meeting Schedule Kent City Council Meeting Date July 6 , 1999 Category Bids 1 . SUBJECT: DEL WEBB PUMP STATION 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: The bid open' for this project was held on June 30th. Due to time onstraints, bid information is not included in the Counci ackets . The Public Works Director will make a recommend ' on as to award. .S E E f} 77/-q C H ED 3 . EXHIBITS• None 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Director (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc . ) S . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: D40 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember j,/Q�, moved Councilmember second$d � �,l,6�,I�,I�.E�(.�fuJFJL that the Del Webb ump StatioV contract be awarded to m 5� �J,03Q,3$O, 15 DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 8A 8� DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS July 6, 1999 TO: Mayor/Council FROM: Don Wickstroi RE: Del Webb Interceptor Relief Sewer Pump Station Bid opening for this project was held on June 30`' with 6 bids received. The apparent low bid was submitted by Tri-State Construction in the amount of $2,032,380.15. The Engineer's estimate was $2,107,285.53. The Public Works Director recommends awarding this contract to Tri-State Construction. BID SUMMARY Tri-State Construction 2,032,380.15 E J Rody & Sons 2,040,724.32 Scarsella Bros 2,061,653.28 Mid-Mountain Contractors 2,092,165.43 Frank Coluccio Construction 2,386,840.99 Robison Construction 2,723,993.55 Engineer's Estimate 2,107,285.53 MOTION: Councilmember _ moves, Councilmember _ seconds, that the Del Webb Interceptor Relief Sewer Pump Station contract be awarded to Tri-State Construction for the bid amount of $2,032,380.15. Kent City Council Meeting Date July 6, 1999 Category Bids 1 . SUBJECT: 3 . 5 MILLION GALLON WATER TANK SAFETY & PAINTING IMPROVEMENTS 2 . SUbULkRY STATEMENT: The bid o ing for this project was held on June 30th. Due to t ' e constraints, bid information is not included in the Cou packets . The Public Works Director will make a recomm ation as to award. S-EE 1? 771-�VE#617) 3 . EXHIBITS• None 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Director (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) S . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: W44 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: ' " Councilmember� moveeQ, CouncilmemberLY2eTh,c�1 .., seconded that the 3 . 5 Million Gallon Water Tank Safety & Painting Improvements contract be awarded to �� u2 rneu�• '�"b a,5'? So . DISCUSSION: ACTION: ✓YYi �►��. s..� Council Agenda Item No. 8B 8 � DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS July 6, 1999 TO: Mayor/Council FROM: Don Wickstro RE: 3.5 Million Gallon Water Tank Safety & Painting Improvements Bid opening for this project was held on June 30`' with 4 bids received. The apparent low bid was submitted by Coatings Unlimited in the amount of $212,584.50. The Engineer's estimate was $233,082.75 The Public Works Director recommends awarding this contract to Coatings Unlimited. BID SUMMARY Coatings Unlimited 212,584.50 RDS Construction 215,462.40 Western Industrial 216,662.43 Jones Painting 258,793.80 Engineer's Estimate 233,082.75 MOTION: Councilmember _ moves, Councilmember &A2— seconds, that the 3.5 Million Gallon Water Tank Safety &.Painting Improvements contract be awarded to Coatings Unlimited for the bid amount of $212,584.50. REPORTS FROM STANDING COMMITTEES AND STAFF A. COUNCIL PRESIDENT B. OPERATIONS COMMITTEE C. PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE D. PUBLIC WORKS/PLANNING COMMITT/JEE&� r/i'0O ,rrl. 67 E . PARKS COMMITTEE F. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS OPERATION COMMITTEE MINUTES - June 1, 1999 COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Judy Woods, Sandy Amodt, Tim Clark STAFF PRESENT: Brent McFall, May Miller, Margaret Yetter, Bonnie Kosko, Tom Brubaker, Anh Hoang, John Hillman, Jackie Bicknell The meeting was called to order by Chair Judy Woods at 3:32PM. Approval of Minutes of May 18, 1999 Committee Member Tim Clark moved to approve the minutes of May 18, 1999. The motion was seconded by Council Member Sandy Amodt and carried 3-0. Approval of Combined Check-Detail Vouchers Dated 5/28/99 Finance Director May Miller presented the vouchers dated May 28, 1999. Tim Clark moved to approve the vouchers. The motion was seconded by Sandy Amodt and carried 3-0. Probation Officer Director of Operations Brent McFall presented the request for the conversion of a temporary probation officer position to a full time regular employee position. The conversion is needed because of the volume of the workload of the probation office. The costs for the change will be S32,270 which probation department revenue will fund. Mr. McFall introduced Margaret Yetter, Municipal Court Administrator and Probation Supervisor Bonnie Kosko. Ms. Kosko said that the court administers sentencing, compliance, and monitoring of cases, of which there are 800 currently, with approximately 250 DUI cases and 250 Domestic Violence cases. These types of cases require a great deal of time and work. Sandv Amodt moved that the Operations Committee recommend to the Council approval of a full time probation officer position in the Probation Department of the Municipal Court at a cost of S32,270 for the balance of the year, and that the 1999 budget be amended to reflect this additional problem. The motion was seconded by Tim Clark and carried 3-0. Election Information Video Brent McFall brought before the Committee the resolution establishing a policy for the use of the City's government access cable television channel for election information for the positions of Kent City Council Members, the Mayor, and for certain ballot measures placed before the voters. The resolution was modified slightly from an earlier version to allow for showing only those candidate profiles that run for contested seats. Each candidate for City Council and Mayor would be able to make a four minute presentation of their platform. Ballot measures would be presented with a"Vote Yes" and a"Vote No" committee with two minute rebuttals allowed. Also, the City would prepare and show video tapes encouraging individuals to register and to vote in the primary, general, or special elections. Candidate Forums conducted by citizen groups, associations, or organizations would provide a mechanism to inform the voters. A request would have to be submitted to the City's Director of Information Services no later than 30 days before the scheduled forum to have it video taped for presentation. The director would determine if appropriate technical staff would be available at the Operations Committee Minutes, 6/1i99 2 time requested and whether the location would be suitable for video taping. The tape would be shown at various times for a period not to exceed two weeks. Tim Clark requested that the lead-in tape indicate when the voting would take place. Judy Woods said that there would be some fall-off of viewers between the first candidate shown and the last. She requested that there be some type of rotation so the same person isn't always shown first. Sandy Amodt wanted to ensure that the candidate presentations would be shown in primetime and not at 3:00AM. Mr. McFall said that the showings would run at consistent times at different times of the day over a one month period and would pick up morning, afternoon, and evening audiences. If a show is shown at 3:OOAM, it would also be shown at 3:OOPM. Tim Clark requested that the lead-in line be specific to say that the City races are non-partisan. Tim Clark moved that the Operations Committee recommend to the Council approval of the Resolution establishing a policy to use Cable Television Channel 28 for Election Information Videos for City elections, and for certain ballot measures. The motion was seconded by Sandy Amodt and carried 3-0. Approval of Bond Ordinance and Contract May Miller requested that Item 6 be presented before Item 5. She requested approval to proceed with Dain Rauscher for$13,221,664 in bond sales for LIDs 340 and 349. The bigger sale would be for 15 year bonds and the smaller for 10 year bonds. Tim Clark moved that the Operations Committee recommend to the Council approval to proceed with Dain Rauscher for $13,221,664 on bond sale for LIDs 340 and 349. The motion was seconded by Sandy Amodt and carried 3-0. LID Budget Change and LID Position Approval May Miller said that accounts have more than doubled and part-time help has been hired and staff has worked overtime. One person is needed to work primarily on the LIDs with the position spending a quarter of its time working on Accounts Receivable. Administrative revenue from LID 340 would provide the S38,138 in funding for the position. Sandy Amodt moved that the Operations Committee recommend to the Council to approve a budget change of$38,138 for the addition of a LID Billing Technician to the Customer Service Division. The motion was seconded by Tim Clark and carried 3-0. Kent Downtown Public Market Development Authority — Loan Authorization Resolution Brent McFall requested approval that the City back a S700,000 bank loan to the Public Development Authority. The loan was obtained on acceptable terms with US Bank for the redevelopment of the old Lumberman's Barn site. As a condition of the loan, the bank has asked the City to reconfirm by resolution its guaranty of the obligation, to approve the loan documents, and to authorize the Assignment of Rents provision. The PDA will retain the loan. After the building renovation, the value of the property should be S 1,200,000. Tim Clark moved that the Operations Committee recommend to the Council passage of the Resolution reconfirming the City's guaranty of the loan obligation for the new Kent Downtown Market site, to approve the loan documents, to authorize the Assignment of Rents provision, and to authorize J. Brent McFall to sign the necessary papers. The motion was seconded by Sandy Amodt and carried 3-0. Operations Committee Minutes, 6/1/99 3 April Financial Report May Miller said the General Fund Revenues are at 5172,726 or 1.2% over budget. Expenditures are 2.8% under budget. Property Tax collections for April are currently at 565,789 which is 1 '/ % under budget. Adjustments to personal property taxes should decrease receipts by 559,000 for this year, but that should be recovered next year. Sales Tax is 3.8% under budget but should only be 0.81/'o under budget by year's end. The Utility Tax is 2.5% over budget. Building permits are looking great and have more than doubled the expected amount. Year-to-date receipts are $199,691 or 53.1% over budget. Recreation Fees are a 539,931 over the expected amount. Fines and Forfeitures are coming in at 48.2% over budget at 538,594. The Golf Course Revenue is 18.9% less than expected, but that could be partly due to a very rainy season. The Capital Improvement Fund is impacted by the sales tax decreases of the General Fund, but the increases in the real estate excise tax more than offsets that. It is currently expected that the Capital Improvement Fund will end the year with 5613,615 more than was budgeted. The meeting was adjourned at 4:22PM. Jackie Bicknell Council Secretary PARKS COMMITTEE MINUTES May 18, 1999 COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Judy Woods, Rico Yingling, Connie Epperly STAFF PRESENT: Lori Flemm, John Hodgson, Jackie Bicknell PUBLIC PRESENT: Lou Accetturo, Rita Bailie, James Tasley, Anne Tasley, Jereme Weimer, Ron Weimer, John Santana, Don Jones, Cindy Reegie The meeting was called to order by Chair Judy Woods at 4:46PM. Approval of Minutes of March 16, 1999 Committee Member Connie Epperly moved to approve the minutes of March 16, 1999. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Rico Yingling and carried 3-0. Chestnut Rime Park Master Plan — Approve Lori Flemm, Parks Planning and Development Supervisor, said that staff had held meetings to receive community input for the plans of a future neighborhood park to be located at 203`�Street and 100`h Avenue. Fifteen neighbors of the park area approved of the plans, which include a picnic shelter, play equipment, tennis courts, and a path to connect the neighborhood to the east. Neighbors will be granting an easement through their property to connect the park to the street. The park has phenomenal views of the valley and a size of 2.5 acres. It is bordered by single family homes. Ground breaking is scheduled for June 2000 with an estimated four months for construction. Rico Yingling moved to approve the Master Plan proposed for development of Chestnut Ridge Neighborhood Park. The motion was seconded by Connie Epperly and carried 3-0. Chestnut ridge Park Namine Lori Flemm said that neighbors want to retain the name of Chestnut Ridge Park which was voted on at a community meeting. Connie Epperly moved to accept the name, Chestnut ridge Park, as the proposed neighborhood park located at 203 d and 100`h in north Kent. The motion was seconded by Rico Yingling and carried 3-0. Mill Creek Trail Renovation IAC Grant Application Lori Flemm introduced Perry Brooks, Park Planner, who explained the storm and erosion damage on the upper part of Mill Creek Canyon Trail. He said the Interagency Committee for Outdoor Recreation has state grant funds available for trail renovation. Connie Epperly moved to authorize submitting a grant application to the Interagency Committee for Outdoor recreation to fund the renovation of Mill Creek Canyon Trail per the attached resolution. The motion was seconded by Rico Yingling and carried 3-0. Downtown Planter Box Donations Parks Director John Hodgson said the City had received donations from the Kent Lions Club and the Soroptomist Club to purchase two additional planter boxes for the downtown area. Rico Yingling moved to accept and appropriate two donations of$434.40 each from the Kent Lions Club and the Soroptomist Club to purchase planter boxes for downtown Kent. The motion was seconded by Connie Epperly and carried 3-0. Parks Committee, 5/18/99 2 Hazardous Trees at Titus Park Report John Hodgson handed out a Titus Railroad Park Hazard Tree Evaluation Report done by Sound Urban Forestry. He said that as part of the Parks Tree Program, trees in the City parks are assessed to make sure they're safe. If it is deemed there are problems, an outside consultant is brought in. There are two trees in Titus Park that certified arborist, Kevin McFarland of Sound Urban Forestry, has checked with the recommendation that one tree be removed immediately. The other tree will only be trimmed as it can last a few more years. Its situation will then be reviewed over the next 18 months to decide how to proceed. Mr. Hodgson said that allowing hazardous trees to remain presents a liability and safety issue. A fairly large size tree will be planted as replacement for the tree that is removed. Frisbee Golf Meeting Results Lori Flemm said that in August 1998 some people came to the Parks Department to ask for a suitable place for a Frisbee Golf course. After reviewing current issues and problems, such as loitering and drinking, staff identified Lake Fenwick Park as a suitable area. The location was reviewed with the Environmental Division of the Public Works Department to determine any impacts. The decision was that the blackberry bushes could be removed and native vegetation encouraged with no environmental damage done to the Park by the course. Volunteers had agreed to remove the blackberries and to do regular maintenance of the area. A notice was placed in the paper stating the intention to build a Frisbee Golf Course at Lake Fenwick Park and no opposition was received. The matter was brought before the Parks Committee and at that time opposition was brought forth from some neighbors of the Park. After that, staff conducted a public meeting at the site with 21 people in attendance, 12 of which were residents from the area. Perry Brooks summarized the results of the meeting. Some people thought the Frisbee golf course would be a good addition to the park. Two citizens were opposed. Lori Flemm described the layout of the course on a map of the park. Mr. Brooks said no grading would be required for installation of the course. Citizen Input: Citizen Lou Accetturo, 3510 S. 252Id St., Kent, opposed the golf course. He said he enjoys the quiet, open-spaced land. He asked some of his neighbors how they felt about using the area for organized recreational use, and they felt the same way as he. He developed a questionnaire and asked others for their opinion on whether they wanted a Frisbee Golf Course or not. Not one person said yes. Mr. Accetturo stated his objections as little parking space, no restrooms, and a wetlands area which could be destroyed by up to 50 people per day criss-crossing through. Ron Weimer, 33627 55`h Ave. S., Auburn, said that he was one of the people that had come to the City asking for a course. The Lake Fenwick Park area was researched and deemed an ideal spot. The paths were already there, and removing the blackberry bushes was the only thing needed. He said people play in the evenings or on weekends. There are portable bathrooms '/z mile away and running water is not necessary. The course would enhance the park. Seventeen year old Jereme Weimer added that disc golf is a positive sport for kids and males aged 17-25 years old. Don Jones, 3519 S. 262"d St, Kent, said he lives across the street from Lou Accetturo, and he is opposed as there is not enough parking. Also, kids like to play there and they could get hit by a flying Frisbee; small animals such as snakes and amphibians could be crushed by the players. Rico Yingling asked Mr. Jones if he was concerned about transients in the area. He said no, but that kids Parks Committee, 5/18/99 3 do have their beer parties in the area and sometimes get rowdy. He was concerned that the golf baskets could get torn out. Cindy Reegie, 23921 100`h Ave. SE, Kent, said her husband is a Frisbee Golf person and he plays almost every week-end at another course. A lot of sites were looked at in Kent and most were being used for other purposes. Lake Fenwick Park is an overgrown, natural area with lots of trees which adds to the challenges of the game. Rita Bailie, 20607 101'` Ave. SE, Kent, said she had visited Lake Fenwick Park and it is an enchanting place with old growth trees and songbirds. She said the blackberries and nettle are habitat ildlife and urged the Committee to keep the area natural. for amphibians and other w Rico Yingling asked about funding for the course. Lori Flemm said some funding had been received several years ago from King County with $2,000 still available. King County had not originally opposed the use of the funds for the golf course, but after the neighborhood opposition, asked the Department not to use those funds. Ms. Flemm said there are other funds available in the Capital Improvement Plan. Responding to Mr. Accetturo's comments, Perry Brooks said the course area is 50 feet away from the wetlands and existing trails will be utilized. The gravel parking area seems to be large enough as it is adequate for 10-12 cars. Judy Woods asked what the total size of the area was and how much would be used for the course. Mr. Brooks said it was 40 acres with three and one half acres to be used for the park. Ms. Flemm said that the area is considered bird habitat, but she does not see removing the blackberries as impacting that habitat. Every blackberry bush will not be removed, only those along the trail. She said the Department feels the site will be improved for bird habitat with the addition of native vegetation, and there will be no negative impact on other wildlife. Mr. Accetturo presented a citizens' questionnaire petition to the Committee. Rico Yingling moved that the petition be made part of the public record. The motion was seconded by Connie Epperly and carried 3-0. Chair Judy Woods asked that the subject be brought back to the next Parks Committee meeting. Kent Downtown Partnership Report The Kent Downtown Partnership Report was presented to the Committee by Director Linda Johnson. The meeting was adjourned at 5:41 PM. Jackie Bicknell Council Secretary PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES May 25, 1999 COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Connie Epperly, Sandy Amodt, Tom Brotherton STAFF PRESENT: Norm Angelo, Roger Lubovich, Ed Crawford, Glenn Woods, Jackie Bicknell PUBLIC PRESENT: John Santana The meeting was called to order by Chair Connie Epperly at 5:1 OPM. Item 5 —Kent Drinking Driver Task Force was deleted. An additional item was added: Contractual Relationship with King County Fire District 440. Approval of Minutes of April 27, 1999 Committee Member Tom Brotherton moved to approve the minutes of April 27, 1999. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Sandy Amodt and carried 3-0. Acceptance of Grant Money for Trauma Equipment Fire Chief Norm Angelo said the Fire Department is eligible to receive $1,200 in grant money that may be used for trauma equipment and the Department is proposing to use the funds to purchase backboards. He said there is always a need for more backboards due to the increase in patients and the rotation of backboards which can end up lost or in other facilities. Tom Brotherton moved that this item be placed on the consent calendar for the June 8, 1999 Council Meeting, recommending that the grant funds in the amount of$1,200 received from the State of Washington be accepted and that the Fire Department be authorized to apply said funds towards the purchase of nine backboards. The motion was seconded by Sandy Amodt and carried 3-0. Acceptance of Grant Funding and City Share Obligation —COPS Universal Officers Police Chief Ed Crawford asked for approval of the Federal grant application of$150,000 for two additional COPS Universal Officers. The Federal government, through the COPS program, will pay $75,000 for each officer for the first three years. The officers must be kept in the Police Department for four years and additional costs born by the City. Sandy Amodt moved that the Public Safety Committee recommend to the Council acceptance of a $150,000 grant for two additional COPS Universal Officers and approval of the City's share of the funding through the year 2002. The motion was seconded by Tom Brotherton and carried 3-0. Gambling Ordinance City Attorney Roger Lubovich presented a new draft ordinance with changes to the tax section of the Gambling Tax Code to allow for the 1999 legislation that reduced bingo and raffle taxes from 10% to 5% effective January 2000. On Page 3, Section 1 of the ordinance, changes were made for consistency to make the language mirror the State statute language. Page 4, Paragraph D prohibits social card room activities that are conducted as a commercial stimulant. Any facility operating an enhanced card room as part of a food and drink establishment would be prohibited. Charitable or non-profit organizations would be exempt. Also exempt would be existing facilities that were in operation and duly licensed with the Gambling Commission on February 2, 1999, which was the Public Safety Committee, 5/25199 2 effective date of the moratorium the Council placed on applications for this type of card room facility. This ordinance, as opposed to the earlier version presented at the April 13, 1999 Public Safety Committee meeting that increased the tax from 10% to 20% for social card game operations, proposes to leave the tax at 10%. Also, the language was removed regarding the prohibition of after- hours operations from 2:00-6:00A.M. The Mayor's Office has released the opposition to the after- hours operations of the City's existing card room casino, Ruby's Casino, by sending a letter to the Liquor Control Board to release the earlier request that Ruby's not be allowed to operate after-hours. This one existing facility would be allowed to amortize their investment by operating as a full, enhanced facility, after-hours, without an increase in tax, until March 1, 2004. Adoption of the ordinance would terminate the existing moratorium placed by the Council on February 2, 1999. Tom Brotherton moved that the Public Safety Committee recommend to the Council approval of the proposed ordinance prohibiting social card games conducted as a commercial stimulant. Sandy Amodt seconded the motion and it carried 3-0. Contractual Relationship with King County Fire District#40 Fire Chief Norm Angelo explained that the Kent Fire Department had been exploring the possibility of providing Fire and Life Safety services to King County Fire Protection District#40 which is located adjacent to Kent's current northern service boundary. Goals were to do a thorough analysis for the potential of a range of cooperative functional relationships in addition to the full contract concept. _ After research on needed operational/capital upgrades and related costs, the Commissioners of Fire District #40 determined that the capital costs for a full contractual agreement were too significant to finance at this time and instead chose to incrementally address their capital and operational needs. They have expressed a desire for some functional contractual relationships such as training and apparatus maintenance. Mutual benefits would be derived from such a functional relationship since mutual aid is currently provided between the two entities. Coverage for the North Benson area is a matter still to be resolved, but the positive relationship between Kent and King County Fire Protection District#40 should continue to serve the citizens well. Both departments are looking at computer systems and software that would keep them compatible with each other. The meeting was adjourned at 6:03PM. Cc e. 1-6�4 ackie Bicknell Council Secretary REPORTS FROM SPECIAL COMMITTEES CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS A. r EXECUTIVE SESSION