Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Meeting - Council - Agenda - 03/18/1997 City of Kent
il MeetingcCit Coun
Agenda
CITY OF
1
1
4 �
��`I�IIGN�'111�
Mayor Jim White
Council Members
Christi Houser, President
Jim Bennett Jon Johnson
Tim Clark Leona Orr
Connie Epperly Judy Woods
March 18, 1997
Office of the City Clerk
CITY OF MPIT
SUMMARY AGENDA
msyn«w"' KENT CITY COUNCIL MEETING
March 18, 1997
Council Chambers
7 : 00 p.m.
MAYOR: Jim White COUNCILMEMBERS: Christi Houser, President
Jim Bennett Tim Clark Connie Epperly
Jon Johnson Leona Orr Judy Woods
CALL TO ORDER
FLAG SALUTE
ROLL CALL
1. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
A. Introduction of Mayor's Appointees
B. Proclamation - Absolutely Incredible Kids Day
C. Suburban Cities Association - 1997 Legislative Update
2 . PUBLIC HEARINGS
None
3 . CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Approval of Minutes
B. Approval of Bills
C. * LID 348 - 64th Avenue South (S. 226 - S. 216) Street
Improvements - Resolution - /zIgg
D. King County Grant Agreement - Special Recycling Events
Authorization
E. Surplus of Beeson/Cavendar House - Authorization
F. Civil Service Commission - Appointment
G. Arts Commission - Appointment
H. Jail Services Contract with City of Bonney Lake -
Authorization
4 . OTHER BUSINESS
A. Home Occupation Standards Zoning Code Amendment
ZCA-96-8 - Regulatory Review
5. BIDS
None
6. CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS
7 . REPORTS
EXECUTIVE SESSION - Property Acquisition
f L .;n/: 'l_. �i'.�.�.fll.:,� - /l�lk',t•-!7' ,r4-cl_ " u��;'z.r �---
8 . ADJOURNMENT
NOTE: A copy of the full agenda packet is available for perusal in
the City Clerk's Office and the Kent Library.
An explanation of the agenda format is given on the back of
this page.
Any person requiring a disability accommodation should contact the
City in advance for more information. For TDD relay service call
1-800-635-9993 or the City of Kent (206) 854-6587.
PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
Citizens wishing to address the Council will, at this time,
make known the subject of interest, so all may be properly
heard.
A) Introduction of Mayor' s Appointees
B) Proclamation - Absolutely Incredible Kids Day
C) Suburban Cities Association - 1997 Legislative Update
CONSENT CALENDAR
3 . City Council Action:
Councilmember W&rLaA,2. move, Councilmember lG
secondedthat Consent Calendar Items A through � be approved.
Discussion
Action � �,-�.tr>
3A. Approval of Minutes.
Approval of the minutes of the regular Council meeting of
March 4 , 1997 .
3B. Approval of Bills.
No vouchers were approved because of schedule changes.
Approval of checks issued for vouchers:
Date Check Numbers Amount
Approval of checks issued for payroll for February 16 through
February 28 , 1997 and paid on March 5, 1997 :
Date Check Numbers Amount
3/5/97 Checks 217971-218286 $ 268 , 155. 22
3/5/97 Advices 43545-43991 594 , 110. 08
$ 862 , 265. 30
Council Agenda
Item No. 3 A-B
Kent, Washington
March 4, 1997
Regular meeting of the Kent City Council was called to order at
7 :00 p.m. by Mayor White. Present: Councilmembers Bennett,
Clark, Epperly, Houser, Johnson, Orr and Woods, Police Chief
Crawford, Planning Director Harris, Public Works Director
Wickstrom, Parks Director Hodgson, and Finance Director Miller.
Approximately 60 people were at the meeting.
PUBLIC Sister City International Art Competition
COMMUNICATIONS Presentation. May Miller, Chair of the Yangzhou
Sister City Committee, noted that a local art
competition had been held in conjunction with an
international Sister City art competition and
that the theme is "My Future in the Global
Community. " She brought the winners forward and
noted that the first place artwork will go on to
international competition. She thanked the
participants, the committee members and others.
Mayor White commended Ms. Miller and the Kent
Arts Commission for their efforts on this
project.
Employees of the Month. Mayor White announced
that the Home Repair Crew has been chosen as
Employees of the Month for March. He noted that
the team is made up of Jeri Broeffle, Jr. , Home
Repair Coordinator, Jim Vinzant, Home Repair
Specialist, and Al Richardson, Home Repair
Specialist. The Mayor noted that this team of
dedicated individuals consistently exhibit the
"Kent Cares" attitude while performing home
repairs for citizens in need. He thanked them
for their commitment to excellence, their
unyielding efforts and their accomplishments.
Planning Director Harris read a letter from Ed
and Ruth Lyons complimenting the Home Repair
Team. Lin Houston, Manager of the Office of
Housing and Human Services, said that their jobs
are unique in that they go not only into the
community, but into people' s homes, and that this
team has earned the trust and respect required
for that. She expressed appreciation for their
dedication and said they deserve this honor.
Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in
Financial Reporting. Mayor White announced
that the Government Finance Officers Association
of the United States and Canada awarded a
Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in
1
Kent City Council Minutes March 4, 1997
PUBLIC Financial Reporting to the City of Kent for its
COMMUNICATIONS 1995 Annual Financial Report. He presented the
award to Finance Director Miller and congratu-
lated her.
Miller said this is a great honor for the City
and that John Hillman deserves the award for his
work on the project.
CONSENT HOUSER MOVED that Consent Calendar Items A
CALENDAR through I be approved. Orr seconded and the
motion carried.
MINUTES (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3A)
Approval of Minutes. APPROVAL of the minutes of
the regular Council meeting of February 18 , 1997 .
HEALTH & (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3G)
SANITATION Rose's Meadow. ACCEPTANCE of the bill of sale
for Rose' s Meadow submitted by Lakeridge
Development, Inc. for continuous operation and
maintenance of 1, 290 feet of street improvements
and 1, 431 feet of storm sewers and release of
bonds after the expiration period, as recommended
by the Public Works Director. The project is
located in the vicinity of 124th Avenue S.E. &
S.E. 261st Street.
(CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3H)
stillwaters Addition No. 1. ACCEPTANCE of the
bill of sale for Stillwaters Addition No. 1
submitted by Lakeridge Development, Inc. for
continuous operation and maintenance of 206 feet
of street improvements and 206 feet of storm
sewers and release of bonds after' the expiration
period, as recommended by the Public Works
Director. The project is located in the vicinity
of S.E. 264th Street and 127th Avenue S.E.
(CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3I)
Meeker Court Apartments. ACCEPTANCE of the bill
of sale for Meeker Court Apartments submitted by
Pacific Northern Construction for continuous
operation and maintenance of 320 feet of sanitary
sewer improvements and release of bonds after the
expiration period, as recommended by the Public
Works Director. The project is located at 24420
64th Avenue S.
2
Kent City Council Minutes
March 4 , 1997
PLAT (OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4A)
Blueberry Farm Preliminary Plat SU-96-9.
This date has been set to consider the Hearing
Examiner's recommendation for conditional
approval of an application by Ekhard Preikschat
and James Crozier of RN Parnel Company for a
20-10t single family residential preliminary
subdivision. The property is located at S.E. 264
Street (if extended) and 110th Avenue S.E. (if
extended) . ORR MOVED to accept the findings of
the Hearing Examiner and to adopt the Hearing
Examiner's recommendation of approval with
forty-six (46) conditions of the Blueberry Farm
preliminary subdivision. Woods seconded and the
motion carried.
POLICE (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3C)
Springwood Substation Lease. AUTHORIZATION for
the Mayor to sign the Springwood Substation lease
agreement renewal for the term of December 1,
1996, through November 30, 1997 . All terms
remain the same. No costs are involved.
PARKS & (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3D)
RECREATION Senior Center Roof Replacement. AUTHORIZATION to
proceed to bid and establish a budget of $150, 000
for the Senior Center Roof Replacement project,
as recommended by the Operations Committee at
their February 19 , 1997 meeting. This is to be
funded with a transfer of $60, 000 from the unused
Kent Commons roof project with the balance of
$90, 000 to come from the CIP fund balance.
(CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3E)
Kent Market Transfer Agreement. AUTHORIZATION
for the Mayor to sign an agreement for the trans-
fer of the Kent Market from the City of Kent
Downtown Partnership, in a form substantially
similar to the proposed agreement, as recom-
mended by the Parks Committee.
(CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3F)
Kent Market Use Permit and Service Agreement.
AUTHORIZATION for the Mayor to sign an agreement
with Kent Downtown Partnership to provide
services to the Kent Market, in a form sub-
stantially similar to the proposed agreement,
as recommended by the Parks Committee.
3
Kent City Council Minutes March 4 , 1997
PARKS & (OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4B)
RECREATION Riverbend Golf Course Complex Management
Proposal. At a special Parks Committee meeting
on February 18, the committee made the following
recommendations:
1. A. That the City of Kent continue to manage
the maintenance of the Riverbend Golf
Complex.
B. That the City of Kent conduct a Request
for Proposal (RFP) process for golf
operations management beginning in 1998 .
C. That if the RFP process is conducted, the
City contract with an outside consultant
to develop the RFP and assist in the
evaluation process.
2 . That City of Kent staff be allowed to decide
its ability to manage the Riverbend Golf
Complex and to submit a proposal within the
RFP process.
Woods asked that No. 2 which reads "That the City
of Kent staff be allowed to decide its ability to
manage the Riverbend Golf Complex and to submit a
proposal within the RFP process" be deleted from
consideration, as requested in Parks Director
Hodgson' s memo dated March 3 , 1997 . There was no
objection.
Parks Director Hodgson explained that the Parks
Committee asked staff to do an evaluation of
options available in terms of managing the golf
course, and that that information was presented
to the Parks Committee in October. He said
there were three options for the city to look at:
1) whether the city could manage it itself,
2) whether management of the golf operation
should be recontracted, and 3) whether there
could be some type of combination of city con-
tract management. He noted that a task force was
formed to evaluate the three options, and that in
December they recommended to the Parks Committee
that the city return as manager of the golf
operation. Staff was then asked to take that
recommendation and do research as to whether
that was feasible for the city to do. He said
4
Kent City Council Minutes March 4, 1997
PARKS & staff looked at it from the standpoint of the
RECREATION ability to financially manage the golf course
and the ability to contract portions of the golf
course in terms of managing it. He said that as
a result, at the special meeting staff made the
three recommendations which are before the
Council in the form of one motion.
Hodgson said the city is doing a good job of
maintenance of the golf operation, that con-
tinuing maintenance is a good idea, and that the
city can continue to make the necessary improve-
ments to make this a first class facility. He
said that conducting an RFP was recommended
because the industry has changed and that since
other golf courses have been improved or built,
the number of rounds played at Riverbend has gone
down and the aggressiveness of discounting and
that sort of thing are new to the golf industry
in this area. He stated that another reason the
city should not be involved in managing the golf
course is that they do not feel comfortable
asking for the $250, 000 to $300, 000 in start up
costs it would take to get off the ground. He
said that if Council chooses to go to another
RFP, in order to make the playing field level it
would be imperative to bring in a consultant to
help develop and write the RFP and assist
whatever team is put together to evaluate that
process, noting that this would assure fairness.
Hodgson noted that they were asked at the special
meeting to put in an RFP, which is prevalent in
other parts of the country. He said he has found
no evidence of that in this state, and that he
does not feel it is in the city' s best interest
to do so.
WOODS MOVED that the City of Kent continue to
manage the maintenance of the Riverbend Golf
Complex, that the City of Kent conduct a Request
for Proposal (RFP) process for the golf opera-
tions management beginning in 1998 , that if the
RFP process is conducted the City contract with
an outside consultant to develop the RFP and
assist in the evaluation process, and that the
City Council approve the committee selected to
develop the RFP. Houser seconded.
5
Kent City Council Minutes March 4, 1997
PARKS & Woods thanked the Golf Task Force for their work
RECREATION and for the confidence they expressed in the
City's ability to take back the golf course. She
also thanked the Committee and said she believes
their recommendation is fair, noting that the
golf business has changed radically.
Johnson stated that the golf course is a public
facility, and that the Council must consider the
best interest of the citizens. He said it would
be best to go through the RFP process to find the
best contractor to deliver the services.
Bennett said that expenses on maintenance have
far exceeded any other golf courses in the area,
and that revenues are going down. He opined that
the existing contract is not a good contract for
either party, and added that the contractor has
put in a lot of hard work. He asked whether the
Council would help select the committee, or just
approve it. Woods replied that the Committee
would consider options and bring it to Council.
Bennett noted that this has been in the committee
process for approximately six months, and that
the $250, 000 figure to manage the golf course is
under-estimated and was known six months ago. He
offered a friendly amendment to Woods' motion to
select a Councilmember to chair a separate com-
mittee. Woods reiterated that every action that
comes out of the Parks Committee will be brought
to Council and therefore does not see the need
for another committee. She did not accept
Bennett' s friendly amendment.
Houser suggested that any Councilmembers can
submit names of people who would be interested
in being on the committee. Orr noted that she
agrees that the Council should approve the com-
mittee selected to develop the RFP. She asked
for a breakdown of maintenance costs at the golf
course, and staff agreed to provide that
information.
Dr. Joseph Drake, 13476 S.E. 242nd Street, said
he would like to see some people of color on all
committees, and that he would like to see an RFP
for everything including the maintenance of
Riverbend. He said he is sure that the main-
tenance cost is higher than all other golf
6
Kent City Council Minutes March 4 , 1997
PARKS & courses in the area, and voiced concern about
RECREATION subsidizing maintenance. He asked that a
committee be formed to look into that, and also
that an outside group share information.
Bob Woodard, 4914 29th Avenue South, Seattle,
Chair of the Ken Griffey Celebrity Challenge,
noted that they were unable to have tournaments
at Riverbend until the current contractor took
over, and that they have had their annual tourna-
ment at Riverbend the last two years. He agreed
that golf is changing, and said it takes money to
get a golf course up to speed and that the
revenue coming in should be put back into the
course. He said Riverbend is a good course and
urged that the current contractor be allowed to
continue what he has been doing.
Arthur Harvey, 16619 S. E. 251st, President of the
Kent Citizens Association, said the current
management of Riverbend demonstrates leadership,
and that they realized changes needed to be made
and met that challenge. He said the current
contractor should be retained.
Raymond Ward, 20637 92nd Avenue South, said he
has been well treated at Riverbend and that the
present administration is doing a good job. He
said that competition is the reason for lower
revenue, which happens with any enterprise. He
questioned why bids should be solicited when the
current management has brought the course to it' s
current position.
Doug Schwab, 4819 S. 315th Place, Auburn, noted
that he is a frequent user of the golf complex,
is a current Riverbend Mens Golf Club Board-
member, is past Chairman of the city' s Golf
Advisory Board, is current Director of Washington
State Golf Association and a recent member of the
City of Bellevue' s Golf Management Selection
Committee. He urged the Council to vote in favor
of the recommendation brought forward by the
Parks Committee, as amended. He noted that the
Parks Department and Golf Task Force have re-
viewed the options available to the City. He
said that if there are problems with the current
contractor, they will be resolved by authorizing
an RFP and making them demonstrate their
7
Kent City Council Minutes March 4, 1997
PARKS & capabilities. He noted that the golf complex has
RECREATION come a long way since 1992 and is one of the
finest facilities in the northwest, which was
accomplished through the management contract with
SSMD and the money saved by keeping rates the
same. He outlined the improvements which have
been made. He said that having everyone who
works at the golf complex be city employees who
report to the Parks Director lacks both financial
and operational merit. He said John Hodgson and
Pete Peterson are in charge of what goes on at
the golf complex and that the City has not given
up their authority over the golf course. He
urged that John Hodgson manage the golf course
and said that SSMD should have no problem com-
peting for the privilege of serving the citizens
of Kent and users of the golf complex.
Brett Wilkinson, 2601 188th Avenue S.E. , head
golf professional at Riverbend, said that the
atmosphere at the golf complex in 1992 was
pitiful and that staff was uncooperative. He
said the atmosphere is now one of the best
around. He noted that creativity and competi-
tion are required and that SSMD has been very
innovative. He pointed out that two junior
golfers, Aaron Kurth and Andy Turnis, have gone
through their program and have signed letters of
intent to attend colleges where they will play
four years of golf and receive a quality educa-
tion. He said that everyone at SSMD has a caring
attitude, and that some put in up to 100 hours a
week.
Aaron Kurth, 31220 28th Avenue South, Federal
Way, said he is employed by Mr. Stone and that
without the environment around him at the golf
complex, he would not have the opportunity he has
now. He expressed appreciation to Mr. Stone and
Mr. Wilkinson for their help and said he would
like to see them stay.
John Duncalf, 11802 53rd Avenue South, Seattle,
said the City is very lucky with what they have
now and that they should look at competitive
service as well as dollars. He said consumers
are very well served at Riverbend and noted that
he is aware of two tournaments which have moved
to Riverbend because of the excellent treatment
they receive.
8
Kent City Council Minutes
March 4 , 1997
PARKS & Jim Stone expressed appreciation for the good
RECREATION things people have said and commended the
employees of the golf complex for their work.
He said he receives many letters of thanks for
the service delivered during tournaments. He
said they have done things which enable them to
strive for excellence, not just what is in their
contract. He noted that there has recently been
an audit which resulted in no type of adversity,
and said he welcomes audits because even better
controls result. He said SSMD is capable and
willing to continue their service, and that they
would like to fulfill their goals and objectives.
He read the goals which were established when
they got the contract: ,to upgrade the quality
of service, increase revenue to the City, and
enhance the overall image of the entire golf
complex in the Puget Sound region. Our philoso-
phy in doing this is that quality service is our
main product, the by-product of our service will
be patronage. " He said although they prefer a
negotiated situation, they will participate in
the RFP process, and asked Councilmembers to keep
an open mind as to what is best for the golf
course and the City of Kent. He said they are
ready to continue to serve and hope for a long
and lasting relationship.
Johnson stated that the RFP process will allow
for competition and for exploring alternatives,
and noted that the existing contractor and his
employees would not be here today if not for an
RFP process. He said that operationally the golf
course pays for itself no matter who runs it. He
said the property was purchased for open space
and ball parks, and that the 9-hole and the
driving range were failing before the City bought
them to preserve open space. He said the Council
then built the golf course for additional recrea-
tion for citizens. He reiterated that it makes
sense to go through an RFP process, and that the
ultimate winners will be the golfers and citizens
of Kent.
Upon a roll call vote, Woods' motion carried
unanimously.
FINANCE (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3B)
Approval of Bills. APPROVAL of payment of the
bills received through February 14 and paid on
9
Kent City Council Minutes March 4 , 1997
FINANCE February 14 , 1997, after auditing by the
Operations Committee on February 19 , 1997 .
A royal of checks issued for vouchers:
Date Check Numbers Amount
02/13/97 179792-180085 $ 913 , 330. 40
02/14/97 180086-180860 919 . 888.44
$1, 833 , 218 . 84
Approval of checks issued for payroll for
February 1 through February 15, 1997 and paid on
February 20, 1997 :
Date Check Numbers Amount
02/20/97 Checks 217639-217970 $ 636, 179 . 46
02/20/97 Advices 43071-43544 245 . 027 .77
$ 881, 207 . 23
REPORTS Council President. Houser announced a workshop
to be held next Tuesday, March 18th at 5: 30 p.m.
regarding the RTA Rail Station. She noted that
the consultant for the Downtown Plan will attend.
Houser asked that Councilmembers interested in
attending the Suburban Cities meeting on March 12
contact Ms. Banister.
Houser announced that the Regional Justice Center
will hold an appreciation award ceremony at noon
on March 14th at Kent Commons and a ribbon cut-
ting ceremony will be held at the Regional
Justice Center at 1: 30. She noted that public
tours of the facility will be held from 10: 00 to
5: 00 p.m. on March 15 and from 10 : 00 to 4 : 00 on
March 16.
Houser noted that there will be an Open House and
Dedication Ceremony for King County Medic 7 on
Saturday, March 15th, from 10: 00 a.m. to
1: 00 p.m. , with a formal ceremony at 11: 00 a.m.
and refreshments to follow at Station 76, 20676
72nd Avenue South.
Operations Committee. Johnson noted that the
Operations Committee meeting scheduled for
March 5th has been cancelled.
Public Works Committee. Clark noted that the
Committee will meet at 3 : 30 p.m. March 5th.
10
Kent City Council Minutes
March 4 , 1997
REPORTS Planning Committee. Orr noted that the Committee
will meet at 4 : 00 p.m. on March 18th.
Administrative Reports. McFall noted that a
petition was received on February 20th for an
area known as the Meridian Valley Annexation, and
that the petition has been reviewed and certified
as sufficient, with signatures of property owners
representing 63% of the assessed valuation of the
area to be annexed. He added that the Notice of
Intent has been submitted to the Boundary Review
Board and explained that they have 45 days to
decide whether or not they will take jurisdiction
of the matter. He stated that a proposed budget
reviewing the revenues and expenses from the
annexation area is being prepared and will be
presented to Council in April .
ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 8 : 15 p.m.
Brenda Jaco}�er, CMC
City Clerk
11
Kent City Council Meeting
Date March 18 , 1997
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: LID 348 - 64TH AVENUE SOUTH (S. 226-S. 216) STREET
IMPROVEMENTS - RESOLUTION
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works
Committee, adoption of Resolution No. N RR setting April 15,
1997, as the date for a public hearing on the formation of
LID 348 - 64th Avenue South Street Improvements.
3 . EXHIBITS: Resolution, Public Works Committee Minutes, Public
Works Director memorandum and vicinity map
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION•
Council Agenda
Item No. 3C
CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of
Kent, Washington, declaring its intention to order the
construction of 64th Avenue South from approximately 200
feet north of South 226th Street to South 216th Street ,
including miscellaneous intersection improvements at the
intersection of 64th Avenue South and West Meeker Street
and a water main line extension to complete water main
loop on 64th Avenue South and water and sewer stub
extensions to unserviced property, and to create a local
improvement district to assess the cost and expense of
carrying out those improvements against the properties
specially benefited thereby; and notifying all persons
who desire to object to the improvements to appear and
present their objections at a hearing before the City
Council to be held on April 15 , 1997 .
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT,
WASHINGTON, as follows :
Section 1 . It is the intention of the City Council of the
City of Kent , Washington, to order the improvement of the
properties within the area described in Exhibit A, attached hereto
and by this reference made a part hereof , by the construction of
64th Avenue South from approximately 200 feet north of South 226th
Street to South 216th Street, including miscellaneous intersection
improvements at the intersection of 64th Avenue South and West
Meeker Street and a water main line extension to complete water
main loop on 64th Avenue South and water and sewer stub extensions
to unserviced property, as more fully described in Exhibit B,
attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof .
All of the foregoing improvements shall be in accordance with
the plans and specifications therefor prepared by the Director of
0280373.02
Public Works of the City and may be modified by the City as long as
that modification does not affect the purpose of the improvements .
Section 2 . The total estimated cost and expense of the
improvements is declared to be $1, 967, 374 . 71, and the entire cost
and expense of the improvements shall be borne by and assessed
against the property specially benefited by the improvements to be
included in a local improvement district to be established
embracing as nearly as practicable all the property specially
benefited by the improvements . Actual assessments may vary from
estimated assessments as long as they do not exceed a figure equal
to the increased true and fair value the improvements add to the
property.
Section 3 . The City Clerk is authorized and directed to give
notice of the adoption of this resolution and of the date, time and
place fixed for the public hearing to each owner or reputed owner
of any lot, tract, parcel of land or other property within the
proposed local improvement district by mailing such notice at least
15 days before the date fixed for public hearing to the owner or
reputed owner of the property as shown on the rolls of the King
County Assessor at the address shown thereon, as required by law.
The City Clerk also is authorized and directed to give notice of
the adoption of this resolution and of the date, time and place
fixed for the public hearing to each owner or reputed owner of any
lot, tract, parcel of land or other property outside of the
proposed local improvement district that is required by the Federal
Housing Administration as a condition of loan qualification to be
connected to the proposed improvements, by mailing such notice at
0280373.02
-2-
least 15 days before the date fixed for the public hearing to the
owner or reputed owner of the property as shown on the rolls of the
County Assessor at the address shown thereon, as required by law.
This resolution also shall be published in at least two
consecutive issues of the official newspaper of the City, the date
of the first publication to be at least 15 days prior to the date
fixed for the public hearing.
Section 4 . All persons who may desire to comment in support
of or object to the improvements are notified to appear and present
those comments or objections at a hearing before the City Council
to be held in the Council Chambers in the City Hall in Kent,
Washington, at 7 : 00 p.m. on April 15 , 1997 , which time and place
are fixed for hearing all matters relating to the improvements and
all comments thereon or objections thereto and for determining the
method of payment for the improvements . All persons who may desire
to comment thereon or object thereto should appear and present
their comments or objections at that hearing. Any person who may
desire to file a written protest with the City Council may do so
within 30 days after the date of passage of the ordinance ordering
the improvements in the event the local improvement district is
formed. The written protest should be signed by the property owner
and should include the legal description of the property for which
the protest is filed and that protest should be delivered to the
City Clerk.
0280373.02
-3-
Section 5 . The City' s Director of Public Works is directed to
submit to the City Council on or prior to April 15, 1997, all data
and information required by law to be submitted.
Passed at a regular open public meeting by the City Council of
the City of Kent, Washington, this 18th day of March, 1997 .
Concurred in by the Mayor of the City of Kent this day
of March, 1997 .
JIM WHITE, MAYOR
ATTEST:
BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
yw4g.r.,,,, 6,-a
FOSTER PEPPER & SHEFELMAN
Special Counsel and Bond Counsel
0280373.02
-4-
EXHIBIT 'A'
LID 348 Boundary Description
The southeast quarter of Section 11, Township 22 North, Range 4 East, W.M., EXCEPT
the south 100.00 feet of the north 7 10.00 feet of the East half of the northeast quarter
of said southeast quarter AND EXCEPT the south 101.50 feet of the north 811.5 feet
of the east 303.84 feet of said east half of the northeast quarter of the southeast quarter
AND ALSO EXCEPT the west 600.00 feet of the east 650.00 feet of the north 264.00
feet of the south 528.00 feet of the north three-quarters of the east half of said southeast
quarter AND ALSO EXCEPT Beginning 30.00 feet west and 1980.00 feet south of the
northeast comer of said southeast quarter; thence west 630.00 feet; thence north 264.00
feet; thence east a distance of 630.00 feet; thence south 264.00 feet to beginning AND
ALSO EXCEPT the east 523.00 feet measured parallel with and from the west line of
West Valley Highway of the north 159.00 feet measured parallel with and from the
north line of the south half of the southeast quarter of said southeast quarter AND
ALSO EXCEPT Beginning at a point on the east line of the west half of the east half of
the southeast quarter in Section 11, Township 22 North, Range 4 East, which point lies
2116.70 feet north of the south line of the said southeast quarter being the True Point
of Beginning of property herein described; thence North 89°57'50" West a distance of
620.00 feet to a point on the east right-of-way line of 64th Avenue South; thence South
along said right-of-way line a distance of 100.00 feet; thence South 89°5T50" East to a
point which lies 170.00 feet west of the east line of said west half; thence southeasterly
to a point on the east line thereof which point lies 170.00 feet south of the True Point
of Beginning; thence North along the east line thereof 170.00 feet to the True Point of
Beginning AND ALSO EXCEPT that portion of property in the southeast quarter of
Section 11, Township 22 North, Range 4 East platted as Northwest Business Park Phase
I in Volume 128 of plats pages 58 thru 61 AND ALSO EXCEPT any portions of the
above described property lying within any public rights-of-ways.
EXHIBIT 'B'
LID 348
64TH AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS
(S 226TH ST TO S 216TH ST)
STREET LMPROVEMEiYTS
The proposed project is the construction of 64th Avenue South from approximately 200 feet north
of South 226th Street to South 216th Street.
The project includes the following improvements:
1. A 58 foot roadway(face of curb to face of curb)which will be a five lane road with no on-
street parking.
2. Cement concrete curb and gutter on both sides.
3. Cement concrete sidewalks on both sides.
4. Storm drainage system.
5. Street lighting system.
6. Signing and channelization.
7. Hydroseeding of unpaved areas.
8. Street trees and grass planting strips.
Also included are miscellaneous intersection improvements at the intersection of 64th Avenue South
and West Meeker Street.
UPi rL=IMPROVEMENTS
Water main line extension to complete water main loop on 64th Avenue South.
Water and sewer stubs to unserviced property.
I , BRENDA JACOBER, City Clerk of the City of Kent, Washington,
certify that the attached copy of Resolution No. is a true
and correct copy of the original resolution adopted on the 18th day
of March, 1997, as that resolution appears on the Minute Book of
the City.
DATED this day of March, 1997 .
Brenda Jacober, City Clerk
0280373.02
PUBLIC wORIGS COMMITTEE
March 5, 1997
PRESENT: Tim Clark Gary Gill
Christi Houser Merrill Vesper
Connie Epperly Robyn Bartelt
LID 348 64th Avenue South Street Improvements (S 226th St to S 216th Stl
"`VVV Gary Gill explained that this project has been in our planning process since the early
'80s. The need for the 64th Ave construction was identified in 1980 as part of the valley
studies program. In 1989 the City actually formed an LID to construct a portion of that
project. The section that was not constructed during that time was between S. 226th
St and S. 216th St. which lies adjacent to the City's Green River Natural Resource Area.
That portion was eliminated because of the environmental impacts the construction
would create on the wildlife habitat existing on site. Gill said since that time the City
has completed construction of the first phase of that project and we are now going to put
in some of the landscaping and other features associated with that project. Gill said this
is an appropriate time to move forward with completion of this missing section of 64th
Avenue. Gill said that this section has been shown as a key link in our 6 Year
Transportation Improvement Program and is also part of our Capital Facilities element
of our Comprehensive Plan. He noted that completion of 64th Ave is an important part
of the City meeting the concurrency requirements for transportation improvement
projects in the valley floor industrial area. Gill noted that this will complete a very
important link in the construction of a major arterial roadway from S. 212th to Meeker
St.
Gill further explained that we have put together draft plans for this portion of the
roadway and all the property owners have been notified. The estimated cost for
construction is approximately $2 Million of which the City's portion is about one-half
of the project cost. Gill said, of the remaining portion which is a little over $1 Million,
we have LID covenants or commitments from three of the affected properties which
makes up about 51.86% of the amount of the assessments associated with this LID. He
said we are also looking at whether or not some additional improvements might be
needed at the intersection of Meeker St & 64th Ave. Once this link is opened, there
may be a need to put in an additional turn lane. He said this is being reviewed in
conjunction with the redevelopment of the property on the northwest comer at Meeker
&64th. The developer is required to do some improvements on that site with regard to
1
the roadway. We are trying to work out an arrangement where part of that can be done
in this LID, however we are not certain it will go forward at this time. Gill said
everything to the north between 216th and 226th is definitely going to be part of this
proposed LID project.
Gill asked the Committee to support moving this forward to full Council to authorize
adoption of a Resolution of Intent to create this LID.
Tim Clark asked what the response was from the remaining property owners. Merrill
Vesper explained that out of seven property owners other than the City, three property
owners attended a property owner meeting and one who was a representative of a fairly
large development,was very much in support of this project. Vesper stated that another
smaller business owner has known that this project is coming thru and they were
surprised at the actual amount of their assessment. Vesper noted that there is one other
property undeveloped and the owner had some wetland concerns on his site and wanted
to know to what degree he would benefit.
Gill said that all of the property owners have been well aware of this for several years.
Vesper explained that we originally formed LID 330 to build 64th Ave and it included
this area. These properties were actually in an LID and then dropped out in the final
assessment roll. In response to Clark, Vesper said all the property owners are notified
and advised of a property owner meetings.
Mrs. Rust asked if the City was aware of the wetland on one of those properties. Gill
explained that wetlands are shown on an inventory and the wetlands in question here
have already been mitigated as part of the Green River Natural Resource Enhancement
Area. He said that we have received a Corps of Engineers 404 permit as part of the
Green River project and that included the construction of 64th Avenue.
Committee unanimously recommended passage of a Resolution of Intent for the creation
of LID 348.
King County Grant Agreement - SpedWL&CYding
Gill stated that as part of the King County Solid Waste Management Program, the City
and King County have adopted a Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plans which
includes waste reduction goals and the City has active recycling program. As a part of
that plan the County Solid Waste Division established a City Optional Program and as
part of that program, they have funds available for local agencies to sponsor recycling
events to take in materials that are not normally picked up as part of the City's curbside
recycling program.
2
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
March 5, 1997
TO: Public Works Committ e
FROM: Don Wickstrom
RE: LID 348 - 64th Avenue South Street Improvement
(S. 226th Street to S. 216th Street)
BACKGROUND
The transportation element of the 1980 Valley Studies program identified 64th Avenue
South as a future collector arterial route essential for development of this portion of the
valley floor.
In 1989 LID 330 was formed to construct and improve 64th Avenue. However that
portion between South 226th Street and South 216th Street was deleted and deferred
until the Valley Detention and Enhanced Wetland Project (Lagoon Conversion Project)
adjacent thereto occurred. With the advent of the Growth Management Act this
missing link of 64th Avenue has taken on new importance with respect to meeting the
City's transportation concurrency requirement. The completion of this missing link is
identified in the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan and is included in the City's
financially balanced 6 Year Transportation Capital Improvement Program. With the
Valley Detention and Enhanced Wetland Project nearly complete, completion of this
missing link of 64th Avenue can now occur. As such, on February 25, 1997 the Public
Works Dept. held an informal meeting with the affected property owners. The meeting
was attended by three of the seven owners other than the City. Nobody voiced
objection to implementing the LID to complete the street. One owner voiced support
and is looking forward to the street being completed. Another knew the project would
happen someday but was surprised at the amount of the assessment. The third owner
is concerned since his property in undeveloped and appears to contain wetlands so he is
uncertain regarding his benefit, especially if his development proposal is rejected.
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
The proposed project is the construction of 64th Avenue South from approximately S.
226th Street to S. 216th Street.
The project includes the following improvements:
1. Five lane roadway 58' curb to curb, two lanes each direction with turn lanes.
2. Curb and gutter.
3. Cement concrete sidewalks on both sides.
4. Storm Drainage system
5. Street lighting
6. Street trees and grass planting strips
7. Sanitary sewer; water main extensions; stubs as required
8. Channelization and signing
PROJECT FUNDING
The project is proposed to be funded (100%) by the Local Improvement District
(Number 348). The current cost estimate is as follows:
Street $1,806,464.65
Water main 146,208.80
Sanitary Sewer 14,701.26
LID TOTAL $1,967,374.71
Because the City of Kent is a property owner within the LID, its share of the assessments
is $961,053.08 or 49% of the total project cost. Monies for same have been budgeted
in the respective Water and Drainage Capital Improvement Programs.
SUPPORT FOR LID 348
To defeat an LID proposal,there must be protest from property owners representing 60
percent or more of the proposed LID assessments. By law, the assessment on City
property cannot be included in figuring the protest percentage. As such the total project
cost for calculating protest percentage is $1,006,321.63 for which the 60% protest
amount would be $603,792.98.
As indicated previously at the informal public meeting there appeared to be property
owner support for the project. Further of the $1,006,321.63, 51.86% thereof is
obligated to participate in this street improvement LID via executed no-protest
covenants. The final decision however of whether or not to form the LID up to City
Council. Properties that have executed no protest covenants are assessment numbers 2,3
and 9.
RECOMMENDATION
Due to the level of interest including committed support (by agreement) for the project,
and the fact that this project is a critical link per meeting the City's transportation
concurrency requirement for this area of the City, the Public Works Department
recommends proceeding with the LID formation process for LID 348.
ACTION: Recommend passage of the Resolution of Intent for the creation of LID
348.
-+ BCD CD CIO CTA W N � D
O z
N N N O N N N N N N N x
NNN CA NNNNNNN
O O O N Cl 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0
A A A A A A A A A A
0 CO 0 Cl D A0 0
O O O O 0 0 0 CD O O 0
0V _ O ? M �Z
Ln WCD L" -t W 0 nnpnymmzDZ O Ox
zzz3KO z -cm
-I
m -� -1 -�
0 00 = 0 = - m - 0 m =
N
TI TI -n rnnm �
r- mmr- mvc -4 --jo0z � �
Z z r Z — 0 ;D x 0 D _ {
-
i -i ZXmM7T :- cnD
moomD �, � >
cn -izz � � mm
0O D � o � mm -mic�r�
n r000 ;o
� D —Z 0Z
rm mmo Cl) --i
DD CO
7 7 _ 0)
rn
J
T
t]D A W � � v+N -+fAN � Ffl CfA = D
O AAW 0CD CA A CYI 0 V UD
O (,T C7CW NUIOON jN
A CT —ICTIV-10 —VOCACO Om
CA CA W W W CA W CT
mmA DNMA0D —IDU ?
ONOA -4NMN ?Kfl j 0
O
C
A 09 N fA as EA� C —I
rn 49
� OcnwA -4a mD 2
IV OD A CAA " W CA)
co nam � Om
co v w
-J. W � AAOOAD r .Z7
CD U)
c Z
A ? 0 >
0 0 � D
rn
EA D
av t!►EA fA fA fA EA fA N
EA "LA N � (A CA
w AtDCT � � -40M0 014 m -i
4 VI -I W V MA V " 0sN coo
CJ CT CT CD OD(D �A O O OD CID CA
-1 Co Co CID -C W CA A OD " -4
A tDA W 0 -4 -4 OIC.M mr
-I OO " O " W W o m m m Z
� N � W CT O (AOANOA �
s�
s
mommm,
d�
1
S. 216TH ST.
L.I.D. BOUNDARY i
N
EXISTING 12" W.M.
AREA USED TO
CALCULATE I ,
ASSESSMENT
I
ASSESSMENT NUMBER '? ':'i"' "`
:.:>:>#�::<: >3:k::S:>.;.. :ter`: � _
l::iv:::.i>i:v'vii:i:)i:4ft:�i :y'• '': W
57
PROPOSED 12 W.M. €> >:. i`•.
8
. 9
'i
U
F-
O I
S. 226TH ST. EXISTING 12" W.M.
u�
w
vi a
w =
Q 00
= cc
v
co
I
L- - � - I _ 348
64TH AVE S. IMPROVEMENTS
WATER ASSESSMENT I
S. 228TH ST.
r
Kent City Council Meeting
Date March 18, 1997
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: KING COUNTY GRANT AGREEMENT - SPECIAL RECYCLING
EVENTS �.... /1TTnwTTl1}1
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works
Committee, authorization for the Mayor to sign the King County
Grant Agreement for Special Recycling Events, and direct staff
to accept the grant and establish a budget in the amount of
$12 , 074 . 00.
3 . EXHIBITS: Grant agreement, Public Works Committee minutes, and
Public Works Director memorandum
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE .OF FUNDS:
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION•
Council Agenda
Item No. 3D
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
March 5, 1997
TO: Public Works Committee
FROM: Don Wickstrom �0)
RE: IGng County Grant Agreement - Recycling
IGng County and the City of Kent have adopted the IGng County Comprehensive
Solid Waste Management Plan which includes waste reduction goals. In order to
help meet these goals, the IGng County Solid Waste Division has established the City
Optional Program. This program funds projects that enable citizens to recycle
materials not included in curbside collection programs.
We have received an Agreement for funding from IGng County for the operation of
two Special Recycling Events. The total budgeted funding under this Agreement is
$12,074.00
ACTION: Authorize the Mayor to sign the grant agreement and direct staff to
accept the grant and establish a budget for $12,074.00.
the roadway. We are trying to work out an arrangement where part of that can be done
in this LID, however we are not certain it will go forward at this time. Gill said
everything to the north between 216th and 226th is definitely going to be part of this
proposed LID project.
Gill asked the Committee to support moving this forward to full Council to authorize
adoption of a Resolution of Intent to create this LID.
Tim Clark asked what the response was from the remaining property owners. Merrill
Vesper explained that out of seven property owners other than the City, three property
owners attended a property owner meeting and one who was a representative of a fairly
large development,was very much in support of this project.. Vesper stated that another
smaller business owner has known that this project is coming thru and they were
surprised at the actual amount of their assessment. Vesper noted that there is one other
property undeveloped and the owner had some wetland concerns on his site and wanted
to know to what degree he would benefit.
Gill said that all of the property owners have been well aware of this for several years.
Vesper explained that we originally formed LID 330 to build 64th Ave and it included
this area. These properties were actually in an LID and then dropped out in the final
assessment roll. In response to Clark, Vesper said all the property owners are notified
and advised of a property owner meetings.
Mrs. Rust asked if the City was aware of the wetland on one of those properties. Gill
explained that wetlands are shown on an inventory and the wetlands in question here
have already been mitigated as part of the Green River Natural Resource Enhancement
Area. He said that we have received a Corps of Engineers 404 permit as part of the
Green River project and that included the construction of 64th Avenue.
Committee unanimously recommended passage of a Resolution of Intent for the creation
of LID 348.
King_County Grant Aereement imperial Rer ,cling
Gill stated that as part of the King County Solid Waste Management Program, the City
and King County have adopted a Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plans which
includes waste reduction goals and the City has active recycling program. As a part of
that plan the County Solid Waste Division established a City Optional.Program and as
part of that program, they have funds available for local agencies to sponsor recycling
events to take in materials that are not normally picked up as part of the City's curbside
recycling program.
2
Gill explained that this Agreement provides funding up to a maximum of $12,074 to
sponsor two recycling events this year and it defines the type of materials which can be
collected at these events. Gill requested authorization for the Mayor to execute this
agreement. Robyn Bartelt, Conservation Specialist, noted that the City is encouraging
people to also bring in any storm debris they have left.
Committee unanimously recommended authorizing the Mayor to sign the grant
agreement and direct staff to accept the grant and establish a budget for $12,074.00.
Meeting adjourned: 4:15 p.m.
3
Contract# D 23837 D
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
Between
KING COUNTY and the CITY OF KENT
This Interlocal Agreement(hereinafter referred to as the Agreement)is executed between King
County, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, and the City of Kent, a municipal
corporation of the State of Washington, hereinafter referred to as "County" and "City" respectively.
This Agreement has been authorized by the legislative body of each party as designated below:
King County Motion No. 8857
City
PREAMBLE
King County and the City of Kent have adopted the King County Comprehensive Solid Waste
Management Plan, which includes waste reduction goals. In order to help meet these goals, the
King County Solid Waste Division has established the City Optional Program. The program funds
projects that enable citizens to recycle materials not included in curbside collection programs. The
City wishes to spend its grant funds to fulfill the terms and conditions set forth in the scope of work
which is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference. Cities applying for city
optional funds must agree to organize a minimum of one Special Recycling Event where at least
four items from the following list of eleven must be collected at each event:
•Polycoated Paperboard • PET &HDPE Plastic Containers
• #3-7 Plastics •Bulky Wood Waste (>3" diameter)
• Clean Wood (untreated) • Appliances
• Ferrous Metals •Non-ferrous metals
• Textiles •Reusable Household Goods
• Tires
L PURPOSE
The purpose of this Agreement is to define the terms and conditions for funding to be provided to
the City of Kent from the County for the operation of two Special Recycling Events.
1
11 RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE PARTIES
The responsibilities of the parties to this Agreement shall be as follows:
A. The City
1. Funds provided to the City by the County pursuant to this Agreement shall be used to
sponsor two special events for the collection from City residents of recyclable materials not
included in household collection programs and consistent with the scope of work and
budget attached hereto as Exhibit A
2. The City will submit to the County reimbursement requests no later than ninety (90) days
following the event in a format specified by the County. The City shall be required to
maintain records of where collected materials are sold or processed to guarantee that all the
collected materials are either reused or recycled and to verify the amounts collected. The
reimbursement request shall be accompanied by an event report which shall include
information on the amount of each material collected, the number of vehicles attending, the
total cost for each budget item and the amount of that cost for which reimbursement is
requested. The reimbursement request shall be accompanied by receipts for verification of
expenses. In the event that the City hires a consultant to manage, plan, or staff the City's
events, the City will provide documentation from the consultant of the number of hours
spent on the event by task and the hourly rate associated with each task.
3. The City will provide the King County Recycling Information Line and the King County
Project Manager with the date, location and copies of any printed material used to publicize
the event as soon as they are available, but no later than thirty (30) days prior to the event.
In the event there is any change in the date or the location of the event, the City will notify
the County a minimum of thirty(30) days prior to the event. The City agrees that the event
will be open to all King County residents and the County has the right to publicize the event
for the benefit of all County residents.
4. The City shall comply with the Minority and Women's Business utilization provisions of
King County Code Chapter 4.18, and amendments thereto, attached to the City's copy of
the Agreement as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by reference to the other two copies of
this Agreement.
5. During the performance of this Agreement, neither the City nor any party subcontracting
under the authority of this Agreement shall discriminate on the basis of race, color, sex,
religion, nationality, creed, marital status, sexual orientation, age, or presence of any
sensory, mental, or physical handicap in the employment or application for employment or
in the administration or delivery of or access to services or any other benefits under this
Agreement as defined by King County Code, Chapter 12.16.
6. During the performance of this Agreement, neither the City nor any party subcontracting
under the authority of this Agreement shall engage in unfair employment practices as
defined by King County Code, Chapter 12.18.
2
7. This project shall be administered by Robyn Bartelt, Conservation Specialist, for the City of
Kent, at 220 Fourth Avenue South,Kent, WA 98032, or designee.
8. The City shall use recycled paper for the production of all printed and photocopied
documents related to the fulfillment of this Agreement. The City shall use both sides of
paper sheets for copying and printing and shall use recycled/recyclable products wherever
practical.
9. The City shall maintain accounts of the direct and indirect costs of these events and of the
data used for evaluation of the events pursuant to Section H. A 2 of this Agreement for a
period of at least six years. These accounts shall be subject to inspection, review or audit
by the County and/or by federal or state officials so authorized by law.
10. The City agrees to submit to the County copies of all written materials which it produces
and/or duplicates for the Special Recycling Events which have been funded through the City
Optional Program. Upon request, the City agrees to provide the County with a
reproducible copy of any such written materials and authorizes the County to duplicate and
distribute any written materials so produced, provided that the County credits the City for
the piece.
B. Coun : The responsibilities of the County pursuant to this Agreement are as follows:
1. Within forty-five(45) days of receiving a request for reimbursement from the City, the
County shall either notify the City of any exceptions to the request which have been
identified or shall process the request for payment. If any exceptions to the request are
made, this shall be done by written notification to the City providing the reason for such
exception. The County will not authorize payment(s) for activities and/or expenditures
which were not included in the scope of work and budget attached as Exhibit A, unless the
scope has been amended according to Section V of this Agreement. King County retains
the right to withhold all or partial payment if the City's report(s) and reimbursement
request(s) are incomplete (i.e., do not include proper documentation of expenditures and/or
adequate description of each activity described in the scope of work for which
reimbursement is being requested), and/or are not consistent with the scope of work and
budget attached as Exhibit A.
2. This project shall be administered by Bill Smith, Project Manager or designee specified by
the King County Solid Waste Division.
3. The County will not provide Special Recycling Events within the corporate limits of the
City. The County will coordinate the timing and locations of its Special Recycling Events
with those of the City to avoid overlap whenever possible.
4. Funding is based on the total amount of King County funds budgeted for Special Recycling
Events and is allocated on the basis of a$4,000 base amount plus a per capita distribution.
The City of Kent budgeted allocation for 1997 is $12,074.
3
5. The County retains the right to share the written material(s) produced by the City which
have been funded through this program with other King County cities for them to duplicate
and distribute. In so doing, the County will encourage other cities to credit the City on any
pieces which were produced by the City.
III. DURATION OF AGREEMENT
This Agreement shall become effective on January 1, 1997 and shall terminate on December 31,
1997.
IV. TERMINATION
A. This Agreement may be terminated by King County, in whole or in part, for convenience
without cause prior to the termination date specified in Section III upon thirty(30) days
advance written notice.
B. This Agreement may be terminated by either parry, in whole or in part, for cause prior to the
termination date specified in Section III, upon thirty(30) days advance written notice. Reasons
for termination for cause include: but are not limited to, nonperformance, misuse of funds,
failure to meet grant related eligibility and failure to provide grant related reports/invoices as
specified in Section II. A. 2.
C. If the Agreement is terminated as provided in this section: (1) the County will be liable only for
payment in accordance with the terms of this Agreement for services rendered prior to the
effective date of termination; and (2)the City shall be released from any obligation to provide
further services pursuant to this Agreement.
D. Nothing herein shall limit, waive, or extinguish any right or remedy provided by this Agreement
or law that either party may have in the event that the obligations, terms and conditions set
forth in this Agreement are breached by the other party.
V. AMENDMENTS
This Agreement may be amended only by written agreement of both parties. Funds may be moved
between tasks in the scope of work attached as Exhibit A only upon written or verbal request by
the City and written or verbal approval by King County. Such requests will only be approved if the
proposed change(s) is (are) consistent with and/or achieves the goals stated in the scope(s) and falls
within the activities described in the scope.
VL HOLD ElARpALESS AND INDEMNIFICATION
The City shall protect, indemnify, and hold harmless the County, its officers, agents, and employees
from and against any and all claims, costs, and/or issues whatsoever occurring from actions by the
City and/or its subcontractors pursuant to this Agreement. The City shall defend at its own
expense any and all claims, demands, suits, penalties, losses, damages, or costs of any kind
4
whatsoever(hereinafter "claims")brought against the County arising out of or incident to the City's
execution of performance of or failure to perform this Agreement. Claims shall include but not be
limited to assertions that the use or transfer of any software, book, document, report, film, tape, or
sound reproduction or material of any kind, delivered hereunder, constitutes an infringement of any
copyright, patent, trademark, trade name, and/or otherwise results in unfair trade practice.
VII. INSURANCE
A. The City, at its own cost, shall procure by the date of execution of this Agreement and maintain
for the duration of the Agreement, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages
to property which may arise from or in connection with performance of work pursuant to this
Agreement by the City, its agents, representatives, employees, and/or subcontractors. The
minimum limits of this insurance shall be $1,000,000 general liability insurance combined single
limit per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage. Any deductible or
self-insured retentions shall be the sole responsibility of the City. Such insurance shall cover the
County, its officers, officials, employees, and agents as additional insureds against liability
arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the City pursuant to this Agreement. A
valid Certificate of Insurance is attached to this Agreement as Exhibit C, unless Section VII. B.
applies.
B. If the Agency is a Municipal Corporation or an agency of the State of Washington and is self-
insured for any of the above insurance requirements, a written acknowledgement of self-
insurance is attached to this Agreement as Exhibit C.
VIM ENTIRE CONT tACT/WAIVER OF DEFAULT
This Agreement is the complete expression of the agreement of the County and City hereto, and
any oral or written representations or understandings not incorporated herein are excluded. Waiver
of any default shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any subsequent default. Waiver of breach of
any provision of this Agreement shall not be deemed to be waiver of any other or subsequent
breach and shall not be construed to be a modification of the terms of this Agreement unless stated
to be such through written approval by the County, which shall be attached to the original
Agreement.
IX. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE
The County and the City recognize that time is of the essence in the performance of this
Agreement.
X. SEVERABILITY
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phase of this Agreement is, for any reason, found to
be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not
affect the validity of the remaining portions.
5
XL NOTICE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF this Agreement has been executed by each party on the date set forth below:
city King County
Accepted for King County Executive
BY
(Title) Director of Natural Resources
Date Date
Pursuant to Pursuant to Motion No. 8857
Approved as to form: Approved as to form:
City Attorney King County Prosecuting Attorney
Date Date
6
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF KENT
1997 SPECIAL COLLECTION EVENT
SCOPE OF WORK AND BUDGET
1. PROJECT TITLE AND SCHEDULE:
A)Event Name: Kent Special Collection Event
B)Projected Event Date: Spring and Fall, 1997
C)Event Hours: 9 am to 3 pm
D)Event Location: Russell Road Park
2. PROJECT MANAGERS:
A) City Contact: Robyn Bartelt
Conservation Specialist
City of Kent
220 Fourth Avenue South
Kent, WA 98032
TEL - 859-6573
FAX- 859-3559
B) Outside Consultant Paul Devine
Pacific Energy Institute
101 Yesler Way, Suite 606
Seattle, WA 98104
TEL - 628-0460
FAX - 628-0953
3. PROJECT ACTIVITIES
A)Number of Events: Two
B)Materials to be collected:
1)Bulky Yard Waste 8) Used Motor Oil Filters
2) Clean Scrap Wood 9) Used Petroleum Based Products
3) Appliances 10) Used Antifreeze
4)Ferrous Metals 11)Used Lead Acid Batteries
5)Non-ferrous Metals 12)Used Tires
6) Textiles 13)Reusable Household Goods
7)Used Motor Oil 14)Used Household Batteries
C)Education Programs:
The following educational materials will be distributed:
1) Information on City Recycling Programs
2) Local Hazardous Waste Management Plan Educational Materials produced by
METRO
3) Other educational materials.
D)Event Promotion:
Event promotion will be accomplished by one or more of the following ways:
1)By distributing a promotional flyer through direct mailings or City utility bills.
2)By notices in City/community newsletters.
3)By distributing a promotional flyer to City Centers.
4)By posting a notice at City Hall and on the City cable channel (if available).
5) By publicizing the event through the King County Solid Waste Division
Promotional Activities and local newspapers.
E)Event Staffing:
Key personnel will include the Conservation Specialist, City staff, consultant staff, and
volunteers. The event greeter, education personnel, and traffic control personnel positions will
be filled by experienced qualified individuals.
4. PROJECT BUDGET
A) Solid Waste Division Budget: S12,074.00
.Budget Catagory Estimated COP LHWMP Total
Quantity Funds Funds Costs
City Staff ------ - $900.00 $2 000.00 $2 900.00
Consultant Staff $4 377.00 $10 000.00 $14 377.00
Collection/Hauling Costs
Wood Waste I 30 tons $1 800.00 $0.00 $1 800.00
Scrap Metal/ pliance 40 tons $2 500.00 $0.00 $2 500.00
Tires 13 tons $0.00 $2 000.00 $2 000.00
Used Oil/Filter/etc. 10 tons $0.00 $1 200.00 $1 200.00
Batteries 12 tons $0.00 $250.00 $250.00
Household Batteries .5 tons $0.00 $2 000.00 $2 000.00
Garbage 2 tons $200.00 $200.00 $400.00
Printing/Ma flin $600.00 $2 500.00 $3 100.00
Event Supplies $100.00 $150.00 $250.00
Other Expenses $997.00 $5 005.00 1 $6 002.00
Temp Helpers $600.00 $800.00 1 $1,400.00
TOTALS $12 074.00 $26 105.00 IS38.17Q.00
5. PROJECT EVALUATION
Kent will provide the following information to the County for project evaluation:
A) The number of carloads arriving at the event.
B) The volume of each material collected.
C)Event cost by budget category.
D)Event comments.
E) Comparison of 1997 volumes and vehicles with prior years events.
Kent City Council Meeting
Date March 18 . 1997
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: SURPLUS OF BEESON/CAVENDAR HOUSE - AUTHORIZATION
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: As approved by the Parks Committee,
authorization to surplus, demolish, and remove the Beeson/
Cavendar house for construction of a parking lot for the
future Kent Historical Museum.
3 . EXHIBITS: Site plan
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Staff and Parks Committee
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS•
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION•
ACTION•
Council Agenda
Item No. 3E
i
K I I I I 1
m � • i
ar I i I I I I IPm
I I
Z ! I I I I
I
IICI I I ❑ 1 1 I
a ALLEY '
>rea'<
CW
c I
•� @� • m
Im
m m
m
IL
i
I - -
� 1 lb.5 I �2'
! � a ❑ I , I
I I I II
I I I I I l�L
i�;�€ A 1. I I I
9 y 1 BERErrER HOUSE Tonkin/Hoyne/Lokan
855 E. 51(ITN SI'.. KENT ..4 u.•.e os«•n
0 3Rge• S -
aid 6 CITY OF KENT wx roa• «x.«., x..w...w«ux w«
•� ILSBDYL�9X nMxC dal w iwx/ru Iq at: +«
Kent City Council Meeting
Date March 18 , 1997
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION - APPOINTMENT
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Confirmation of the Mayor's appointment
of Tim Gimenez to serve as a member of the Kent Civil Service
Commission. Mr. Gimenez and his family are Kent residents and
his children attended Kent Schools. He is the owner of TJls
Sports Cards on Meeker Street where he has been in business for
eight years. He currently serves on the Board of Directors of
the Kent Downtown Partnership and has served as a member of
CBAG, a Regional Justice Center Citizen Advisory group.
He will replace Mike Pattison, who resigned, and his term will
continue until 4/30/98 .
3 . EXHIBITS: Memorandum
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Mayor White
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION•
ACTION•
Council Agenda
Item No. 3F
MEMORANDUM
TO: CHRISTI HOUSER, CITY COUNCIL PRESIDENT
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: JIM WHITE, MAYO
DATE: MARCH 12, 1997
SUBJECT: APPOINTMENT TO THE KENT CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION
I have recently appointed Tim Gimenez to serve as a member of the Kent Civil Service
Commission. Mr. Gimenez and his family are Kent residents and his children attended Kent
Schools. He is the owner of TJ's Sports Cards on Meeker Street where he has been in business for
eight years. He currently serves on the Board of Directors of the Kent Downtown Partnership and
has served as a member of CBAG, a Regional Justice Center Citizen Advisory group.
He will replace Mike Pattison, who resigned, and his term will continue until 4/30/98.
I submit this for your confirmation.
JW:jb
Kent City Council Meeting
Date March 18 , 1997
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: ARTS COMMISSION - APPOINTMENT
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Confirmation of the Mayor's appoint-
ment of Lilly Y. Kato to serve as a member of the Kent Arts
Commission. Ms. Kato was born and raised in Kent. Moving from
a farm in the Kent Valley, Ms. Kato and her family currently
reside on the East Hill in Kent and her children attended Kent
schools. She had a career in real estate sales until her
retirement in 1990.
Through the years she has been active in PTA, 4-H, is active in
the Kent-Kaibara Sister City Association, and is associated
with the White River Buddhist Temple where she serves as
President of the Women's Association. She is on the Board of
Directors of the Kent Historical Society and is involved in the
"Public Artwork to Honor the Japanese-American Community"
project.
Ms. Kato will replace Leigha Connor, who resigned, and her
appointment will continue until 10/99 .
3 . EXHIBITS: Memorandum
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Mayor White
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS•
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
-
Council Agenda
Item No. 3G
MEMORANDUM
TO: CHRISTI HOUSER, CITY COUNCIL PRESIDENT
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: JIM WHITE, MAYOR `t-r`
DATE: MARCH 12, 1997
SUBJECT: APPOINTMENT TO THE KENT ARTS COMMISSION
I have recently appointed Lilly Y. Kato to serve as a member of the Kent Arts Commission. Ms.
Kato was born and raised in Kent. Moving from a farm in the Kent valley,Ms. Kato and her family
currently reside on the East Hill in Kent and her children attended Kent Schools. She had a career
in real estate sales until her retirement in 1990.
Through the years she has been active in PTA, 4-H, is active in the Kent-Kaibara Sister City
Association, and is associated with the White River Buddhist Temple where she serves as President
of the Women's Association. She is on the Board of Directors of the Kent Historical Society and is
involved in the "Public Artwork to Honor the Japanese-American Community" project.
Ms. Kato will replace Leigha Connor,who resigned, and her appointment will continue until 10/99.
I submit this for your confirmation.
JW.jb
1,.1,E
Kent City Council Meeting
Date March 18, 1997
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: JAIL SERVICES CONTRACT WITH CITY OF BONNEY LAKE -
AUTHORIZATION
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Authorization to enter into a Jail
Services Contract with the City of Bonney Lake for handling
their Electronic Home Detention and Work Release individuals.
All costs associated with the contract are covered by the fees
charged for the individuals to participate. There will be no
impact to the Corrections Facility general population.
3 . EXHIBITS: Contract, memo
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Staff and Public Safety Committee 2/18/97 (3-0)
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 3H
KENT POLICE DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO: MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC SAFETY COMNIITTEE
Jim Bennett, Chair
Tim Clark
Leona Orr
FROM: Ed Crawford, Chief of Police
DATE: February 14, 1997
RE: Proposed Jail Services Contract with Bonney Lake
Attached you will find a copy of a proposed Jail Service Contract with the City of Bonney Lake.
We ask that approval of the contract be placed on the February 18, 1997, Public Safety
Committee agenda as other business.
Thank you. ' \�
kir ��
i � ,
RENT POLICE DEPARTMENT CSic��
February 13 , 1997
TO: Chief Ed Crawford
A`
FROM: Captain Charles E. Miller
SUBJECT: Proposed Bonney Lake Contract
Attached is a proposed contract with Bonney Lake for our handling
of their Electronic Home Detention and Work Release individuals.
I would like to present this to the Public Safety Committee on
f
February 18 , 1997 .
CONTRACT FOR JAIL SERVICES
In accordance with the Interloca_ Cooperation Act (RCW
Chapter 39 . 34) and the City and County Jails Act (RCW Chapter
70 . 48 , as amended) , the City of Kent , Washington, a municipal
corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City of Kent' and
the City of Bonney Lake , a municipal corporation of the State of
Washington, hereinafter referred tc as "Purchaser" , hereby agree
to enter into this service contract as follows :
I . DEFINITIONS
Unless the context clearly shows another usage is intended,
the following terms shall have these meanings in this contract .
A. "Kent Corrections Facility" means a place, owned and
operated by the City of Kent primarily designed, staffed, and
used for the housing of adults charged with a criminal offense ;
for the punishment and correction of offenders after conviction
of a criminal offense; or for confinement and/or holding during a
criminal investigation of a civil detention to enforce a court
order . As of the date of the execution of this agreement ,
"Facility" includes the City of Kent Corrections Facility, at
1230 Central Avenue South, Kent , Washington, operated by t o City
of Kent pursuant to this contract .
B . "Prisoner" means a person held when a charge of
Purchaser municipal corporation is the principal basis for
confining that person (e . g . , the person is confined by reason of
an ordinance violation--pre-trial or post-trial) . It includes ,
but is not limited to, (a) a prisoner arrested by and booked on
behalf of a police officer of Purchaser by reason of an "open
charge" or investigation of a felony; or a prisoner detained for
Purchaser after a City of Kent "hold" has been released; (b) , t
includes an individual arrested by a police officer of Purchaser
and booked and housed in the Kent Corrections Facility.
C . "Work release" means a program of partial ccnfinement
available to offenders who are employed or engaged as a student
in a regular course of study at school . Participation in work
release shall be conditioned upon the offender attending work or
school at regularly defined hours and abiding by the rues of the
work release facility. As defined by the Sentencing Reform Act
of 1981 (RCW Chapter 9 . 94A, as amended; .
D . "Home detention" means a program of partial confinement
available to offenders wherein the offender is confined in a
private residence subject to electronic surveillance . As defined
by the Sentencing Reform Act of 1981 (RCW Chapter 9 . 94A, as
amended) .
II . JAIL AND HEALTH SERVICES
City of Kent shall accept for confinement and/or hcld_' ng
the Facility those persons who are prisoners as defined in
Article I and shall furnish Purchaser with the Facility, booking,
and custodial services , and personnel for the confinement of
Page 1 of 4
Purchaser' s prisoners at least equal to those provided by the
City of Kent for confinement of its own prisoners . The services
provided herein shall include basic medical care, as defined by
Washington State Custodial Care Standards (W.A. C . #289-20) except
hospitalization, prescriptions , surgical and dental care which
Purchaser agrees to bear . The City of Kent shall furnish to the
Purchaser all Facility medical and health care services required
to be provided pursuant to Federal or State law and regulations
promulgated thereto .
III . COMPENSATION
Purchaser will pay the City of Kent a maintenance charge as
follows :
A. City of Kent hereby authorizes the use to Purchaser for
the confinement and/or holding of persons booked and held by the
Kent Corrections Facility (KCF) , subject to available space and
facilities as may be determined solely by City of Kent . It is
acknowledged and agreed that access to KCF is on a nonexclusive
space available basis and further that the City of Kent is
contracting with and retains the right to contract with other
cities for similar access to KCF during the term of this
contract .
B . Purchaser agrees to pay to City of Kent the sum of
Fifty-eight Dollars ($58) per day per Prisoner per 24-hour period
calculated from initial booking time, (or any portion_ of a 24-
hour period) . If any of Purchaser' s inmates are being held for
other jurisdictions , then the cost to house them will be shared
equally.
C . Purchaser agrees to pay to City of Kent the sum of
Seventeen Dollars ($17) per day for Electronic Home Detention and
Twenty-two Dollars ($22 ) per day for Work Release if Prisoner is
unable to pay. In addition, Purchaser agrees to pay to City of
Kent the sum of Twenty-five Dollars ($25 ) for the application fee
if Prisoner is unable to pay.
D . Payment of these costs will be made promptly and to the
City of Kent within 30 days after the monthly statement is
received.
E . Each party may examine the other' s books and records to
verify charges . If an examination reveals an improper charge ,
the amount shall be applied to future billings until the credit
has been exhausted. Any unused credit which exists at the time
of termination of this contract shay_ be refunded within 20 days
of the date of termination .
IV. TERM
This contract shall take effect and shall
supersede and terminate any other Facility use agreement or
contract existing between City of Kent and Purchaser . This
contract shall be in effect through 1997 and then automatically
renew from year to year unless otherwise modified or terminated
as provided herein . This contract may be terminated by either
Page 2 of 4
party upon 60 days written notice from the party desiring
termination.
V. MCDIFICATION
This contract shall be modified only upon mutual consent of
the parties , in writing, signed by both parties .
VI . INDEMNIFICATION. L=TIGATION
A. Purchaser agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless
City of Kent, its officers , agents , and employees , or any of them
from any and all claims , actions, suits , 'liability, loss , cost ,
expenses , and damages of any nature whatsoever by reason of or
arising out of any act or omission of Purchaser, its officers ,
agents , and employees , or any of them in arresting, detaining,
charging or transporting persons .
In the event that any suit based upon such a claim,
action, loss , or damage is brought against the City of Kent ,
Purchaser shall defend the same at its sole cost and expense ;
provided that City of Kent retains the right to participate in
said suit if any principle of governmental or public law is
involved; and if final judgment be rendered against City of Kent ,
and its officers , agents , and employees, or any of them, or
jointly against City of Kent and Purchaser and their respective
officers , agents, and employees , or any of them, Purchaser shall
satisfy the same .
B . The City of Kent shall defend, indemnify and 'hold
harmless Purchaser and its officers , agents, and employees , or
any of them from any and all claims , actions, suits , liability,
loss, cost , expenses , and damages of any nature whatsoever by
reason of or arising out of any act or omission of City of Kent ,
its officers , agents , and employees , or any of them in confining
persons who have been presented to and accepted by the Facility
by Purchaser, its officers , agents , and employees while said
persons are in the Facility or in the custody of City of Kent
outside the Facility except to the extent said claim, action,
loss or damage is the result of the negligence of Purchaser. In
the event that any suit based upon such a claim, action, loss , or
damage is brought against Purchaser, City of Kent shall defend
the same at its sole cost and expense provided that Purchaser
retains the right to participate in said suit if any principle
governmental or public law is involved, and if final judgment be
rendered against Purchaser, its officers , agents , and employees ,
or any of them, or jointly against Purchaser and City of Kent and
their respective efflcers , agents, and employees , or any of them,
City of Kent shall satisfy the same .
VII . NON-DISCRIMINATION/ECUALITY OF EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY
City of Kent will provide equal employment opportunity in
administering this contract, in implementing this contract , and
in administering the Facility, and prohibit discriminatory
treatment .
Page 3 of 4
ViII . WAIVER
No waiver of any right under this contract shall be
effective unless made in writing by the authorized representative
of the party to be bound thereby. Failure to insist upon full
performance on any one or several occasions does not constitute
consent to or waiver of any later nonperformance , nor does
payment of a billing or continued performance after notice of a
deficiency in performance constitute an acquiescence thereto .
IX. INSURANCE
Purchaser and City of Kent shall each obtain and maintain
general liability insurance with limits of one million dollars
($1, 000 , 000) per occurrence , two million dollars ($2 , 000 , 000 )
aggregate . This general liability insurance shall provide
protection against the general liability, police professional
liability, and error and omission of each entity. Each entity to
the contract shall provide certificates of insurance
demonstrating coverage by the required insurance . Purchaser
shall name City of Kent as an additional named insured on its
liability policy (in regard to arrest , detention, charging or
transporting of prisoners) , and a copy of the additional insured
endorsement shall be attached to the certificate . City of Kent
reserves the right to request a certified copy of the policy that
evidences the above coverages .
X. SEVERABILITY
If any provisions of this contract shall be held invalid,
the remainder of this contract shall not be affected thereby if
such remainder would then continue to serve the purposes and
objectives of both parties .
XI . ENTIRE CONTRACT
This contract consists of four pages . This contract
represents the entire understanding of the parties . --
supersedes any oral representations that are inconsistent with or
modify its terms and conditions .
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this agreement
to be executed on the day written below .
CITY OF BONNEY LAKE CIT`_' OF KENT
By: By:
Rex Pulfrev_ Date Jim White Date
Mayor Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By: By:
James Dionne Date Roger Lubovich Date
City Attorney City Attorney
Pane 4 of 4
- - ,,
�____�
G'
31
MEMORANDUM
TO: JIM WHITE, MAYOR
CHRISTI HOUSER, COUNCIL PRESIDENT
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: JUDY WOODS, CITY COUNCIL MEMB
DATE: MARCH 18, 1997
SUBJECT: CITY COUNCIL EXCUSED ABSENCE
I would like to request an excused absence from the March 18, 1996 City Council meeting. I will be unable
to attend due to my work schedule.
Thank you for your consideration.
JW:kno
Kent City Council Meeting
Date March 18 , 1997
Category Other Business
1. SUBJECT: HOME OCCUPATION STANDARDS ZONING CODE AMENDMENT
ZCA-96-8 - REGULATORY REVIEW
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: The Land Use and Planning Board has
recommended amending the Zoning Code standards for home
occupations. The Planning Board held a public hearing on this
matter on February 24, 1997 .
3 . EXHIBITS: Memo, staff report, Land Use and Planning Board
minutes of 2/24/97
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Land Use and Planning Board
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS•
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
to approve Kent Zoning Code Amendment ZCA-96-8 as recommended
by the Land Use and Planning Board, and to direct the City
Attorney to prepare the necessary ordinance.
DISCUSSION•
ACTION:
-
Council Agenda
Item No. 4A
CITY OF T101
Jim White, Mayor
March 13, 1997
TO: MAYOR JIM WHITE AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: FRED N. SATTERSTROM, PLANNING MANAGER
RE: PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO HOME OCCUPATION ZONING
STANDARDS (#ZCA-96-8)
On February 24, 1997, the Land Use and Planning Board held a public hearing on a regulatory
review filed by Ms. Sue Olson (#ZCA-96-8). Following their public hearing, the Planning Board
voted to recommend certain modifications to Kent's home occupation regulations, KCC
15.08.040. Essentially, the amendments recommended by the Board are two-fold:
1. That a special home occupation permit (SHOP) be required for certain types of
home occupations, namely in-home music and dance schools and/or studios, art
lessons and academic tutoring. This special permit would require a public hearing
before the Hearing Examiner following notification of surrounding property
owners.
2. The special home occupation permit would be granted by the Hearing Examiner
only if certain criteria are met. These criteria are outlined in the Planning
Department's report to the Planning Board dated 2-24-97 and included in the
packet to the City Council, attached.
Following approval by the City Council, the Planning Department staff will work with the City
Attorney's office to incorporate these changes into ordinance form.
FNS/mp:a:sueolson.cc
cc: James P. Harris, Planning Director
2204(h AVE SO i XENT WASHINGTON 99032-5895/TELEPHONE (206)859-33001 FAX s S59.3334
CITY OF
A Jim White, Mayor
Planning Department (206)859-3390/FAX(206)850-2544
James P. Hams, Planning Director
February 24, 1997
TO: STEVE DOWELL, CHAIR
LAND USE AND PLANNING BOARD
FROM: FRED N. SATTERSTROM, PLANNING MANAGER
RE: REGULATORY REVIEW REQUEST (#ZCA-96-8) - PROPOSED
MODIFICATION TO HOME OCCUPATION STANDARDS (OLSON)
Background:
On September 17, 1996, Ms. Sue Olson appeared before the City Council's Planning Committee to
propose an amendment to the City's home occupation zoning standards. Her suggested amendment
would allow pre-schools for the teaching of music to be exempt from the standards for home
occupations. Following her testimony, the Planning Committee voted to send this item to the Land
Use and Planning Board for action.
On October 7, 1996, Ms. Olson filed a regulatory review request with the Planning Department and
formally initiated the amendment process (see Attachment A). In the petition, she requested that the
home child care exemption be broadened to include "related instructional services" such as music
schools, pre-schools, and academic tutoring.
On January 13, 1997, the Land Use and Planning Board held a workshop on the proposed code
amendment. The application was reviewed by the Board in light of the current standards for home
occupations. At the conclusion of the workshop, it was decided to hold a public hearing on the
proposed amendment.
Existing Situation:
Currently, Ms. Olson teaches music lessons out of her home at 815 Marion Place in Kent. She gives
private, individual piano lessons as well as Kindermusic group lessons in class sizes of up to eight
(8) children at a time. According to the teaching schedule submitted by Ms. Olson, as many as 20
2204thAVE SO /KENT WASHING TON 99032S895/TELEPHONE l2061859-3300/FAX#.459-1334
RE: Home Occupation Standards (4ZCA-96-8)
February 24, 1997
Page 2
children may attend group and/or individual lessons in a day (Tuesday), and as few as three (3) on
another day(Wednesday). In total,48-58 children may attend individual or group lessons per week.
Group or Kindermusic classes last from 30-75 minutes. Many times the parents of participating
children stay on the premises while the classes are conducted. Ms. Olson has indicated that the
parents are invited to participate in the lessons themselves. Thus, the parents' vehicles are parked
on the street during the duration of the classes. Neighbors who have contacted the Planning
Department have indicated that sometimes these vehicles block their driveways and the approach
to the mailboxes, at times interfering with the delivery of mail. The fact that Ms. Olson and her
abutting neighbors live on a cul de sac compounds the on-street parking problem since there is a
relative lack of curbed street frontage.
Home occupations are regulated by Section 15.08.040 of the Kent Zoning Code. These standards
regulate a number of aspects related to home-based businesses, including daily client trips and on-
site parking(see Attachment B). According to Sec. 15.08.040(D)(2),no more than four(4)two-way
client trips per day are allowed. In addition,the same section states that home occupations shall not
create a need for additional on-site or off-site parking.
Section 15.08.040(D)(3) also regulates the conduct of sales and services in the home. This section
requires that the sale of goods and services (in this case, the teaching of music) shall be to one (1)
customer at a time, by appointment.
With respect to Ms. Olson's home business,the individual piano lessons are within the limits of the
Zoning Code. No more than four (4) individual lessons are given on any day according to the
schedule submitted by Ms. Olson. These children are dropped off by parents and later picked up;
no additional parking is needed. Also, these lessons are limited to one customer at a time.
On the other hand, it is the group Kindermusic classes which do not conform to the home occupation
standards. Cars are parked on the street by parents who remain on-site during the duration of the
classes. Staff visited the site a couple of times during scheduled classes to verify this. Therefore,
Ms. Olson's home occupation does not conform with parking regulations nor with daily client trip
limits set forth in the Zoning Code. Finally, these group classes are outside the limits of Section
15.08.040(D)(3) which restrict the sale of services to one person at a time.
Analysis:
The purpose of home occupation regulations is to allow certain business or occupational activities
to be undertaken in a dwelling or a building accessory to a dwelling in any zone in which dwellings
are present. The home occupation is to be conducted in such a manner that it does not detract from
the residential character of the surrounding area.
RE: Home Occupation Standards (#ZCA-96-8)
February 24, 1997
Page 3
To ensure that home occupations do not disturb their residential neighbors, Kent's Zoning Code
places limits on the number of employees, daily client trips, parking demand, in-home sales, use of
equipment, utility demand, as well as environmental performance standards. Staff reviewed the
home occupation standards of other cities(i.e., SeaTac,Kirkland,Auburn,Tukwila,and Bothell)and
found a great similarity in the stated criteria for home occupations. Parking was one such issue. All
of these cities' ordinances attempted to restrict parking for home occupations by not allowing "a
parking level demand beyond that which is normal to a residential area." In Kirkland,the same limit
of four (4) two-way client trips per day appears in the City's zoning regulations along with a
requirement that no more than one(1) person at a time visit the home for sales of goods or services.
There was also much similarity in limits on the use of equipment, number of employees, amount of
floor space for home occupation use, signage, and outdoor storage.
Nevertheless, while these cities have similar requirements and limits for home occupations, there
are significant differences in how they handle proposals which do not conform with all stated
criteria. According to Kent's regulations, if a proposed home occupation business does not conform
with one or more of the performance standards, it is not permitted. In the City of SeaTac, if a
proposed home occupation meets at least eight(8) but not all eleven (11) performance standards, it
requires a public hearing before the City's Hearing Examiner. In Auburn, certain types of home
occupations automatically require what is called a "special home occupation permit" (SHOP) which
entails a public hearing before the City's Hearing Examiner. One of the listed home occupations is
"music and dance studios."
In the SeaTac example above, if a home occupation does not meet the strict application of all criteria,
it may still be permitted by the Hearing Examiner following a public hearing where neighbors have
been notified and allowed to give input into the decision-making process. In these cases, criteria are
specified in the code to aid the Hearing Examiner in making his/her decision. In the Auburn
example cited above, certain types of home occupations are specifically called out for a public
hearing, but all home occupations must meet certain performance standards.
Staff Recommendation:
In comparison to other cities' regulations, Kent's may be somewhat more rigid in terms of requiring
conformance with all performance standards without variance. Most of the other randomly selected
cities offered an alternative approval process if most, but not all, requirements were met. In the
present case, the Planning staff would favor an alternative approach which would require a public
hearing before the Kent Hearing Examiner for in-home music and dance schools and/or studios,
similar to the process adopted in the City of Auburn. In addition, staff would recommend the
following language be added to the Zoning Code in order to establish guidelines for the Hearing
Examiner in such cases:
RE: Home Occupation Standards (#ZCA-96-8)
February 24, 1997
Page 4
"In considering applications for special home occupation permits, the Hearing Examiner
shall consider the nature and conditions of all adjacent uses and structures, and no such
special home occupation permit shall be authorized by the Hearing Examiner unless the
Hearing Examiner finds that the authorizing of such permit will not be materially
detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property in the zone or vicinity in which
the property is located, and that the authorization of such special home occupation permit
will be consistent with the spirit and purpose of this Title. In authorizing a special home
occupation permit, the Hearing Examiner may impose such requirements and conditions
with respect to location, installation, construction, maintenance and operation and extent
of open spaces in addition to those expressly set forth in this Title, as may be deemed
necessary for the protection of other properties in the zone or vicinity and the public
interest."
CITY OF L"L22 VIT
Jim White, Mayor
Planning Department (206)859-3390/FAX(206)850-2544
James P. Harris,Planning Director
LAND USE & PLANNING BOARD MINUTES
Public Hearing
February 24, 1997
The meeting of the Kent Land Use and Planning Board was called to order by Chair Steve Dowell
at 7:00 p.m. on February 24, 1997, in Chambers West of Kent City Hall.
LAND USE & PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT:
Brad Bell, Vice Chair
Tom Brotherton
Jerry Daman
Ron Harmon
David Malik
Sharon Woodford
LAND USE & PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ABSENT:
Steve Dowell, Chair
PLANNING STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT:
James Harris, Planning Director
Fred Satterstrom, Planning Manager
Kim Marousek, Planning Intern
Teresa Beener, Administrative Secretary
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Board member Tom Brotherton MOVED and Board member Ron Harmon SECONDED a motion
to approve the minutes of the February 10, 1997 meeting. Motion carried.
ADDED ITEMS TO THE AGENDA
None.
COMMUNICATIONS
None.
NOTICE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS
Planning Director Jim Hams informed the Planning Board members of a City Council Workshop
at 5:00 p.m. tomorrow night in Council Chambers (February 25, 1997). The meeting is on regional
governance "What should King County be governing and what should the local jurisdictions be
governing. " Mr. Harris explained that the meeting will discuss regional and rural governance versus
4ZCA-96-8 Home Occupation Standards
2204)h AVE SO /KENT WASHINGTON 98032-5895/TELEPHONE (106)859-33001 FAX#859.1334 _
Land Use and Planning Board Minutes
February 24, 1997
Page 2
urban governance and the thirty-five incorporated cities and King County are going to discuss who
does what in the County. This meeting is an open forum.
Mr. Harris stated that the next Land Use and Planning Board meeting is a workshop on
March 10, 1997 in Council Chambers East at 7:00 p.m.
#ZCA-96-8 HOME OCCUPATION STANDARDS - (F. Satterstrom)
Planning Manager Fred Satterstrom explained that the Planning Department received a request for
a regulatory review from Ms. Sue Olson. He explained that Ms. Olson requested an amendment to
the Home Occupation standards of the Kent Zoning Code to exempt instructional services such as
preschools, music programs, or academic tutoring.
Mr. Satterstrom stated that Ms. Olson resides at 815 Marion Place on Scenic hill of Kent. He
explained that she teaches individual piano lessons and maintains a Kindermusic program which
teaches young children in a group environment. The group lessons contain six to eight children and
are scheduled at certain times during the week. He stated that Tuesday is her busiest day with as
many as twenty students being seen and Wednesday is her slowest day with as little as three
students. In total it appears that anywhere from 48 to 58 students attend either individual or group
lessons in a given week.
Mr. Satterstrom stated that Ms. Olson's home occupation is inconsistent with the Kent's regulations
in two areas. One area is in the parking requirements. Home Occupation regulations state that there
can be no more than four two-way client trips per day and, in this case, there are several times that
amount on a day like Tuesday, for instance. The second issue is with respect to the actual delivery
of the service. The Home Occupation regulations for the City of Kent allow only one client at a
time. Mr. Satterstrom explained that the individual lessons do not pose a problem for Ms. Olson;
the problem stems from the group sessions.
Mr. Satterstrom explained that this matter was brought to the City's attention on the basis of a
complaint where it was brought to the attention of the City that there were cars being parked on the
road and the City responding on the basis of a complaint. The City's Code Enforcement Officer
looked into the matter and determined that there was a violation or a conflict with the regulations
that govern home occupations. In informing Ms. Olson of her alternatives, she decided to approach
the policy making body with the alternative of looking at the code, seeing if it was up to date, and
seeing if a change was warranted.
Mr. Satterstrom stated that to understand home occupations every City that he knows of has
established zoning regulations that relate to the governing and the operation of home occupations.
4ZCA-96-8 Home Occupation Standards
Land Use and Planning Board Minutes
February 24, 1997
Page 3
He explained that Certified Public Accountants are one of the more common home occupations. He
explained that zoning codes generally recognize that as long as the residential character of the City
or a neighborhood is not changed by the home occupation,then those kinds of business activities that
can exist in homes can and should be allowed. Most cities as well as Kent go on to specify certain
regulations within which home occupations must adhere. Some of the aspects that Kent regulates
are traffic, parking on-site (not to create a need for off-site parking that would affect the
neighborhood), number of employees (one additional employee allowed), the delivery of sales and
service of goods to customers (one customer at a time), and other factors. Mr. Satterstrom explained
that ordinances of other jurisdictions were reviewed in order to provide a comparison to Kent's
regulations.
Mr. Satterstrom explained the City looked at the home occupation regulations for the cities of
SeaTac,Kirkland,Auburn,Tukwila, and Bothell. He stated that all of these jurisdictions have home
occupation regulations. Some of the zoning codes were recently adopted. Mr. Satterstrom explained
that many of the criteria and regulations read identical to Kent in terms of their concern. The actual
regulation may be written a little different but all of the jurisdictions are concerned with the traffic,
the residential character, etc as mentioned in the staff report.
Unlike Kent; however, the cities of SeaTac and Auburn have an alternative process when you have
a home occupation that doesn't neatly fit with all of the regulations. There is a process by which a
person proposing a home occupation may petition the City through the Hearing Examiner process
for an alternative way of allowing a home-based business. He explained that in the City of SeaTac,
there are eleven criteria that relate to home occupations. If an appiicant meets all eleven then the
application for a home occupation is approved administratively. However, if the application meets
at least eight of the criteria but fails to meet all eleven, one has to go before the City's Hearing
Examiner. The City of Auburn requires the teaching of music lessons in studio type groups to
automatically require a hearing. Mr. Satterstrom explained that compared to other jurisdictions
which were reviewed, Kent looked fairly rigid; Kent doesn't offer any alternative.
Mr. Satterstrom explained that staff is recommending that the City of Kent endorse the Auburn
model and to set aside the teaching of music and dance studies out of the home and require a public
hearing before the Hearing Examiner. He explained that this method would allow neighbors to
participate and be notified of the action. It would allow them to participate in the hearing and have
their concerns heard by the Hearing Examiner, if they have any, and would allow the Hearing
Examiner to custom tailor the requirements for such a Home Occupation based on its particular
impacts. He stated that the recommended verbiage to add to the zoning code is stated on the last
page (page 4) of the February 24th staff report.
4ZCA-96-8 Home Occupation Standards
Land Use and Planning Board Minutes
February 24, 1997
Page 4
Board member Tom Brotherton questioned how the subject of music and dance was derived and
asked if there weren't other options as in auto repair.
Mr. Satterstrom explained that auto repair was considered and consciously rejected because of the
potential nuisance factor. Auto repair tends to get out of hand and can be loud. This does not seem
to be very compatible with the residential character.
Board member Brad Bell questioned adding academic tutoring. He stated that academic tutoring
seems to be very similar in nature in compared to music lessons or dance lessons.
Planning Manager Fred Satterstrom explained that they were not limiting the vast possibilities that
could apply. He stated that academic tutoring in groups could be added.
Board member Sharon Woodford questioned how much of the neighborhood would be notified
regarding the public hearing. Satterstrom explained that the property owners within a '00' radius
would be notified of a public hearing.
Board member Ron Harmon MOVED and Tom Brotherton SECONDED a motion to open the public
hearing. Motion carried.
Ted Knapp 824 Marion Place. Mr. Ted Knapp explained that he purchased his home nine years
ago and lives a few houses away from Ms. Olson (the applicant). Mr. Knapp explained that one of
their reasons for choosing a house on a cul-de-sac was because of the little drive through traffic. He
stated that he is concerned with modifying the existing regulations that would increase the traffic and
hence the safety factor for his daughter. He stated that he feels that Ms. Olson should operate her
home business within the existing regulations even if this means she would have to find an
alternative location for her group music lessons.
Mr. Knapp explained that in the cul-de-sac parking and mail delivery has been a problem because
of the traffic impact from Ms. Olson's business.
Patsy Braseth 807 Marion Place. Ms. Patsy Braseth explained that she lives right next door to
Ms. Olson and has lived there for nineteen years. Ms. Braseth stated that the reason they chose their
home was because it was located on a cul-de-sac with no drive through-traffic. She explained that
she has been aware since the summer of 1996 that Ms. Olson was involved in some sort of
enterprise.
Ms. Braseth explained that she is concerned with traffic, parking, safety and the inconvenience to
the immediate neighbors. She stated that she found it very interesting that Ms. Olson had never been
#ZCA-96-8 Home Occupation Standards
Land Use and Planning Board Minutes
February 24, 1997
Page 5
sited by the City authorities for her violation of current parking and home occupation regulations.
She explained that the neighbors had been sited for parking too close to their own driveway and
having vehicles facing the wrong direction in the cul-de-sac.
She stated'that she is inconvenienced by Ms. Olson's clients parking in front of her mailbox and her
mail was not delivered as a result. She commented that she respects Ms. Olson's right to make a
living from her home but not when the rights of others are infringed upon. She remarked that it is
time for Ms. Olson to find another location outside the neighborhood which would accommodate
the traffic that her business generates.
Board member Ron Harmon questioned if it was the group music lessons that caused the problems.
Ms. Braseth indicated that the group lessons were the problem and that there was one instance where
there were about ten cars parked along the cul-de-sac. She remarked that children are not just being
dropped off; parents remain for the group lessons.
Mr. Harmon questioned how many houses are in the cul-de-sac. Ms. Braseth responded that there
are about ten houses.
Vice Chair Brad Bell questioned the location of Marion Place and asked which house Ms. Olson
lived in. Ms. Braseth described the location of Marion Place and which house Ms. Olson resided.
Jesse Cadena, 822 Marion Place. Mr. Jesse Cadena stated that he opposes the changes to the
Home Occupation Standards that Ms. Olson requested. Mr. Cadena commented that changing the
parking standards to allow an increase in the number of trips allowed to home occupations would
greatly diminish the peace and quiet that he expected when he selected this area as his residence
twenty years ago. He stated that the cul-de-sac is too narrow to safely allow small children to cross
the street with minimum visibility for drivers entering the cul-de-sac. The location is very close and
one house to the sharp left to turn automobiles must negotiate when entering this cul-de-sac. The
patrons of this business are reluctant to use Ms. Olson's driveway until absolutely necessary unless
it is raining. As a result, the onstreet parking is congested first, then they park in her driveway. Mr.
Cadena explained that he has experienced partial blockage of his own driveway due to customers
of Ms. Olson's business parking along the curb adjacent to his driveway which has a twelve foot
curb space between his driveway and his neighbors driveway. Mr. Cadena stated that Ms. Olson told
him two years ago that she would eventually have to relocate her business due to the response she
has had with this business. Mr. Cadena strongly urged the denial of this request.
Board member Tom Brotherton questioned what percent of the time there were severe parking
problems during the day or week. Mr. Cadena explained that he doesn't keep track of the day or
4ZCA-96-8 Home Occupation Standards
Land Use and Planning Board Minutes
February 24, 1997
Page 6
time but stated that the parking problem is very frequent and congested into the evenings some
times. He stated that over the last two weekends there were cars congested throughout the weekend.
He Schalk 806 Marion Place. Ms. Helen Schalk explained that she lives directly across the
street from Ms. Olson. Ms. Schalk stated that her husband and her are concerned with their 120 foot
of lawn that runs along the street and Ms. Olson's customers have to park there. She stated that there
really isn't any other place to park. Ms. Schalk explained that there are no sidewalks and she has
Ms. Olson's customers on her lawn. Ms. Schalk remarked about the visibility around the comer and
the danger involved with children crossing the street.
Ms. Schalk stated that there were five cars parked at Ms. Olson's and then later there were another
four more cars parked. She stated that she wasn't sure of Ms. Olson's schedule. She remarked that
there is a lot of traffic in the cul-de-sac already with some teenagers living in the cul-de-sac and there
friends coming by. She explained that people sometimes make a wrong turn and whip around in the
cul-de-sac to turn back around. She stated that any more traffic in the cul-de-sac is going to cause
a hinderance to her family and the children in the neighborhood.
Sue Olson. 815 Marion Place. Ms. Sue Olson stated that she appreciated the concerns of her
neighbors. She stated that home occupations need to be sensitive to the neighborhood concerns.
Ms. Olson explained that she started her Kindermusic program as a way to earn money and still
remain home with her children. She stated that her business is growing and when she outgrows the
neighborhood she plans to relocate her business.
She stated that she knows a number of people doing home businesses in unincorporated areas and
in other cities with Kindermusic programs. She explained that it takes four to six years to build up
a clientele that would generate enough income so that a person could afford to move into a
commercial location and pay rent. She stated that the home occupation allows a person starting a
business time to build up clientele. Ms. Olson stated that she supports staff recommendation for
allowing a public hearing through the Hearing Examiner to consider a"Special Home Occupation
Permit."
She stated that she based her class maximum size of eight students on the amount of parking
available in her driveway, in front of her house, and across the street. She stated that there is room
for the cars. She commented that some of her neighbors have offered to let her clients park in their
driveways to eliminate some of the parking problems.
Ms. Olson stated that she teaches eight classes per week. She explained that during some of these
classes the parents are involved in the program and stay with their children and during other classes
the parents leave the children. She commented that the classes that she has that are later in the day
4ZCA-96-8 Home Occupation Standards
Land Use and Planning Board Minutes
February 24, 1997
Page 7
(two classes at 4:00 p.m.) the children are dropped off. She stated that when the parents are there
to pick the children up, there can be seven or eight cars at one time.
She stated that she has asked all of her parents to be respectful of her neighbors. She stated that a
public hearing would be beneficial to allow an opportunity to mitigate the neighborhood concerns.
Mr. Harmon asked for further clarification of Ms. Olson's class schedule. Ms. Olson explained that
in addition to the two classes at 4:00 p.m. which parents drop the students off, she also has classes
at 9:30, 11:00, and one class at 1:00 p.m. She explained that on Monday she has one class, Tuesdav
she has three classes, Wednesday she has no classes, Thursday she has one class and Friday she has
two classes during the day.
Mr. Brotherton questioned if there was any mitigation that would be possible to address the parking
issue. He asked if most of the parents could park in her driveway or in her yard and not around the
cul-de-sac. Ms. Olson stated that parents are parking in her driveway and in front of her house. She
explained that she can get five vehicles in her driveway and in front of her house and the other two
or three cars usually park across the street.
Mr. Brotherton questioned that when she had only five or six students she could have all the parents
parking in her driveway. Ms. Olson stated that she can get three cars in her driveway and then two
more in front of her house. She stated that if the street parking is the issue then her neighbors have
offered to allow her clients to park in their driveways.
Board member Jerry Daman questioned when Ms. Olson started her Kindermusic business.
Ms. Olson explained that she does not run during the summer months. She explained that this is her
third year in business. Mr. Daman questioned that she was the only Kindermusic program in the
area. Ms. Olson explained that sheds the only Kindermusic program in Kent, Auburn, Federal Way,
and Renton area.
Mr. Daman asked Ms. Olson if she anticipated her size growing. Ms. Olson stated that she would
not be able to increase her business and remain where she is. She explained that if she increases her
business she will need to find an alternative location.
Mr. Daman questioned if Ms. Olson was gainfully employed during the summer months. Ms. Olson
explained that she is employed through Kent Commons during the summer and she teaches different
classes and workshops.
Board member Daman clarified that there are as many as twenty cars that could be there on one day.
Ms. Olson stated that she conducts three separate classes on Tuesdays and there could be twenty cars
4ZCA-96-8 Home Occupation Standards
Land Use and Planning Board Minutes
February 24, 1997
Page 8
coming and going on that day. She explained that when she set up her schedule she allowed plenty
of time between groups so there wouldn't be an overlap in vehicles from one group coming and the
other going.
Mr. Harmon questioned how far the clientele travelled for her Kindermusic program. Ms. Olson
explained that one of her students come from south Federal Way. She stated that some come from
SeaTac and Tukwila.
Vice Chair Brad Bell questioned her request for the regulatory review. Mr. Bell stated that the
change that she requested is different from what staff has proposed and asked if she agreed with the
staff s position. Ms. Olson stated that she supports the staff s recommendation.
Ms. Olson submitted a copy of a petition signed by her neighbors supporting her home occupation.
Christie Merrill 14605 SE 222nd Street Kent WA 98031. Ms. Christie Merrill stated that she
is a Kindermusic parent and came here tonight in support of Ms. Olson. Ms. Merrill commented that
before the classes began in October, Ms. Olson took each parent outside and indicated where they
could and could not park. Ms.Merrill stated that she is unable to park in Ms. Olson's driveway. She
commented that there are always at least two cars parked in the driveway when her child attends
class on Friday mornings.
Ms. Merrill stated that her children benefit greatly from Ms. Olson's Kindermusic program. She
stated that she felt it would be unfortunate if Ms. Olson was unable to continue her program.
Audrey Germanis 34922 10th Place SW Federal Way, WA 98023. Ms. Audrey Germanis
remarked that she is also a Kindermusic parent and came on behalf of Ms. Olson. She stated that
she has been involved in Ms. Olson's Kindermusic program since February 1996.
Ms. Germanis stated that Ms. Olson told them where they could park and to be considerate of the
neighbors. She commented that she has never seen a single person out on the street. She stated that
she felt comfortable allowing her four year old to walk on that street.
She commented that she feels that Ms. Olson's program is an excellent program and that is the
reason she travels all the way from Federal Way to be a part of the Kindermusic program.
Ms. Germanis stated that she would like to see Ms. Olson to be able to continue offering the
Kindermusic program.
Mr. Daman questioned how long Ms. Germanis had known Ms. Olson. Ms. Germanis stated that
she started the Kindermusic program in February of last year.
4ZCA-96-8 Home Occupation Standards
Land Use and Planning Board Minutes
February 24, 1997
Page 9
Mr. Daman asked Ms. Germans how she heard of Ms. Olson's program. Ms. Germanis stated that
she had heard about the Kindermusic program in a parent magazine and called an 800 number. She
was sent a lot of information including names of people who taught in the area.
Board member Daman questioned if there was a regional Kindermusic program. Ms. Germans
stated that there is a national organization of Kindermusic. She explained that the Kindermusic
program is designed to encourage young children's musical aptitude.
Planning Manager Fred Satterstrom explained that Ms. Olson was the one who requested the
regulatory review and the Board has heard testimony tonight regarding her individual business.
Mr. Satterstrom encouraged the Board to take a broader view and consider whether or not to change
the home occupation regulations to allow the teaching of group music and dance studios in the home
and allow the Hearing Examiner to consider each application individually.
Mr. Satterstrom commented that the issues brought forth tonight are valid issues that the Hearing
Examiner would have to consider when considering an application like Ms. Olson's.
Mr. Satterstrom stated that the real issue is whether the Board would like to stay with the existing
regulations or to modify the standards as staff has recommended.
Board member Ron Harmon questioned why Ms. Olson originally approached the City Council
Planning Committee. Mr. Satterstrom explained that there had been a complaint lodged to the Code
Enforcement Officer. Ms. Olson was given her options and chose to request a regulatory review in
an attempt to modify the home occupation regulations.
Mr. Harmon questioned the Code Enforcement process. Mr. Satterstrom explained that the
Enforcement issue is on hold pending the outcome of Ms. Olson's regulatory review.
Mr. Satterstrom explained that this can be serious if Ms. Olson is denied a modification in the code
that would allow her to legally operate the City would take action to stop her business.
Board member Sharon Woodford questioned whether it would stop her whole home occupation or
just the teaching of group lessons. Mr. Satterstrom stated that the City would probably suspend the
group lessons.
Ted Knapp, 824 Marion Place. Mr. Knapp stated that he arrives home about 4:30 p.m. every day
and he has never seen automobiles parked in Ms. Olson's driveway. Mr. Knapp commented that he
felt her business has reached the limit and she needs to find an alternative location to conduct her
business. He stated that his daughter is not playing in the street while Ms. Olson's customers are
there because he is reluctant to allow her to play or ride her bicycle because of the traffic impacts.
4ZCA-96-8 Home Occupation Standards
Land Use and Planning Board Minutes
February 24, 1997
Page 10
Mr. Knapp stated he appreciated the comments from some of the Kindermusic parents. He stated
that Ms. Olson should move her business to their neighborhood and let them see the impacts.
Patsv Braseth 807 Marion Place. Ms. Braseth asked the Board not to be sensitive to the fact that
Ms. Olson is a single parent. Ms. Braseth stated that she was a single parent for seven years with
four children and operated a home business to support her children. She stated that she had not
impacted her neighbors when she operated her home business. She asked the Board to take that into
consideration.
Jesse Cadena 822 Marion Place. Mr. Cadena questioned if this is approved will there be a limit
on the traffic.
Board member Jerry Daman questioned whether Ms. Olson was at a place where she could afford
to move to another location. Ms. Olson stated that she is getting close to being able to relocate her
business. She stated that the advantage to starting a business in her home is that the money that she
generates is her profit. She stated that she has been saving in anticipation of finding a place in order
to expand. She stated that she would have never had an opportunity to start her business if she had
not been able to start in her home.
Ted Knapp 824 Marion Place. Mr. Knapp reiterated that it is important to remember the safety
of the children in the neighborhood. He stated that the safety of his daughter is his only issue.
Planning Director Harris remarked that the Board is here to consider the recommendation of the staff
to allow a public hearing presided by the Hearing Examiner to determine whether a home occupation
would be allowed and to determine conditions for the operation of such business.
Vice Chair Brad Bell questioned what the recourse would be when public safety is a concern.
Mr. Harris explained that most people conducting home occupations do not know there are home
occupation regulations.
Board member Ron Harmon MOVED and Jerry Daman SECONDED a motion to close the public
hearing. Motion carried.
Board member Tom Brotherton commented that the regulations in Kent are more rigid and should
be loosened. He stated that businesses like Ms. Olson's provides a valuable service to many
residents in our community and should be encouraged. He remarked that the proposal from staff has
merit in that it provides for the Hearing Examiner to look at each individual situation to see what
types of impact the business would have on the neighborhood and apply mitigating conditions when
necessary. Mr. Brotherton stated that he hopes that the Hearing Examiner will take into
4ZCA-96-8 Home Occupation Standards
Land Use and Planning Board Minutes
February 24, 1997
Page 11
consideration the traffic constraints that are impacting these neighbors. He also thinks that staff
should consider adding acting, tutoring and art classes to the list.
Board member Sharon Woodford stated that she agreed with Mr. Brotherton's statement and
indicated that she felt it was important to allow for home occupations. She stated that there are some
neighborhoods that would not be impacted by a home occupation. Ms. Woodford stated that she
agrees with staff s recommendation.
Mr. Harmon commended Ms. Olson for bringing this situation to the City Council's Planning
Committee. Mr. Harmon agrees with the staff proposal.
Vice Chair Brad Bell stated that he grew up in the Kent area taking both private and group music
lessons in people's homes. Mr. Bell stated that he is concerned with the public safety issues.
Brotherton MOVED and Woodford SECONDED a motion to accept staff s recommendation as
outlined in the staff report. Motion carried with Brad Bell opposed.
Respectfully Submitted,
amXd P. Harris
oring Secretary
C:\USERS\DOC\LANDUSE\MINUTES\PCMIN05.29
9ZCA-96-8 Home Occupation Standards
CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS
A.
R E P O R T S
A. COUNCIL PRESIDENT
OOPERATIONS COMMITTEE
CO. PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE
DO. PLANNING COMMITTEE
PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE
F. PARKS COMMITTEE
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS
EXECUTIVE SESSION: Property Acquisition
4'
of
PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE
March 5, 1997
PRESENT: Tim Clark Gary Gill
Christi Houser Merrill Vesper
Connie Epperly Robyn Bartelt
LID 348 64th Avenue South Street Improvements (S 226th St to S 216th SO
Gary Gill explained that this project has been in our planning process since the early
'80s. The need for the 64th Ave construction was identified in 1980 as part of the valley
studies program. In 1989 the City actually formed an LID to construct a portion of that
project. The section that was not constructed during that time was between S. 226th
St and S. 216th St. which lies adjacent to the City's Green River Natural Resource Area.
That portion was eliminated because of the environmental impacts the construction
would create on the wildlife habitat existing on site. Gill said since that time the City
has completed construction of the fast phase of that project and we are now going to put
in some of the landscaping and other features associated with that project. Gill said-this
is an appropriate time to move forward with completion of this missing section of 64th
Avenue. Gill said that this section has been shown as a key link in our 6 Year
Transportation Improvement Program and is also part of our Capital Facilities element
of our Comprehensive Plan. He noted that completion of 64th Ave is an important part
of the City meeting the concurrency requirements for transportation improvement
projects in the valley floor industrial area. Gill noted that this will complete a very
important link in the construction of a major arterial roadway from S. 212th to Meeker
St.
Gill further explained that we have put together draft plans for this portion of the
roadway and all the property owners have been notified. The estimated cost for
construction is approximately $2 Million of which the City's portion is about one-half
of the project cost. Gill said, of the remaining portion which is a little over $1 Million,
we have LID covenants or commitments from three of the affected properties which
makes up about 51.86% of the amount of the assessments associated with this LID. He
said we are also looking at whether or not some additional improvements might be
needed at the intersection of Meeker St &_ 64th Ave. Once this link is opened, there
may be a need to put in an additional turn lane. He said this is being reviewed in
conjunction with the redevelopment of the property on the northwest corner at Meeker
64th. The developer is required to do some improvements on that site with regard to
1
the roadway. We are trying to work out an arrangement where part of that can be done
in this LID, however we are not certain it will go forward at this time. Gill said
everything to the north between 216th and 226th is definitely going to be part of this
proposed LID project.
Gill asked the Committee to support moving this forward to full Council to authorize
adoption of a Resolution of Intent to create this LID.
Tim Clark asked what the response was from the remaining property owners. Merrill
Vesper explained that out of seven property owners other than the City, three property
owners attended a property owner meeting and one who was a representative of a fairly
large development,was very much in support of this project.. Vesper stated that another
smaller business owner has known that this project is coming thru and they were
surprised at the actual amount of their assessment. Vesper noted that there is one other
property undeveloped and the owner had some wetland concerns on his site and wanted
to know to what degree he would benefit.
Gill said that all of the property owners have been well aware of this for several years.
Vesper explained that we originally formed LID 330 to build 64th Ave and it included
this area. These properties were actually in an LID and then dropped out in the final
assessment roll. In response to Clark, Vesper said all the property owners are notified
and advised of a property owner meetings.
Mrs. Rust asked if the City was aware of the wetland on one of those properties. Gill
explained that wetlands are shown on an inventory and the wetlands in question here
have already been mitigated as part of the Green River Natural Resource Enhancement
Area. He said that we have received a Corps of Engineers 404 permit as part of the
Green River project and that included the construction of 64th Avenue.
Committee unanimously recommended passage of a Resolution of Intent for the creation
of LID 348.
Icing County Grant Agreement - Special ReQ cling,
Gill stated that as part of the King County Solid Waste Management Program, the City
and King County have adopted a Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plans which
includes waste reduction goals and the City has active recycling program. As a part of
that plan the County Solid Waste Division established a City Optional Program and as
part of that program, they have funds available for local agencies to sponsor recycling
events to take in materials that are not normally picked up as part of the City's curbside
recycling program.
2
Gill explained that this Agreement provides funding up to a maximum of $12,074 to
sponsor two recycling events this year and it defines the type of materials which can be
collected at these events. Gill requested authorization for the Mayor to execute this
agreement. Robyn Bartelt, Conservation Specialist, noted that the City is encouraging
people to also bring in any storm debris they have left.
Committee unanimously recommended authorizing the Mayor to sign the grant
agreement and direct staff to accept the grant and establish a budget for $12,074.00.
Meeting adjourned: 4:15 p.m.
3