The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCity Council Meeting - Council - Agenda - 11/26/1996 Cityof Kent Colt Council Meetingv Agenda CITY OF Mayor Jim White Council Members Christi Houser, President Jim Bennett Jon Johnson Tim Clark Leona Orr Connie Epperly Judy Woods NovemberJor, 1996 26 Office of the City Clerk CITY OF � SUMMARY AGENDA i KENT CITY COUNCIL MEETING November ' 1996 ' J Council Chambers 7 : 00 p.m. MAYOR: Jim White COUNCILMEMBERS: Christi Houser, President Connie Jim Bennett Tim Clark y Woods Jon Johnson Leona Orr Judy Woods CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL 1. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Appointees A. Introduction of Mayor' s B. Proclamation - Education Day C. Regional Justice Center Update D. Task Force Report on School Impact Fees 2 . PUBLIC HEARINGS A. 1997 Budget (Continued) - Ordinance- 33aa 3 . CONSENT CALENDAR A. Approval of Minutes B. Approval of Bills C. Salt Air Hills Vista Park Master Plan - Approval and Adoption D. 1997 City Art Plan Budget and 1997-2001 Five Year Art Plan - Approval and Adoption E. LID Underwriter Selection and Bond Sale - Authorization F. Centennial Center lease Policy - Resolution - /4 86 G. 1997 Tax Levy - Ordinance - 33,:� H. Parking Code Amendment - Ordinance- 33a'4 I . Public Improvements Standard Specifications Code Amendment - Ordinance - J. Meridian Asphalt Overlays - Accept as Complete K. Green River Court Apartments - Bill of Sale L. Park Court Apartments - Bill of Sale M. 98th Avenue Treatment Pond - Accept as Complete N. Saar Street Vacation Fund STV-96-4 - Deposit Authorization 0. Canyon Crest Estates Final Plat FSU-96-6 - Set Meeting Date P. Transit Advisory Board - Appointment Q. Library Board - Appointment R. Human Services Commission - Appointment 4 . OTHER BUSINESS A. Human Services Mitigation Consultant Contract - Authorization B. Single Family Residential Zoning District Regulations ZCA-96-6 5 . BIDS A. SE 274th Way Hillclimb Section (Green River Road to 108th Avenue SE) Ground Improvements 6 . CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS 7 . REPORTS � b��F��ct-�-s,.�: �o /�"�� 'jl2c�a.�• EXECUTIVE SESSION: Property Acquisition - 8 . ADJOURNMENT NOTE: A copy of the full agenda packet is available for perusal in the City Clews Office and the Kent Library. An explanation of the agenda format is given on the back of this Page. Any person requiring a disability accommodation should contact the City in advance for more information. For TDD relay service call 1-800-635-9993 or the City of Kent(205)854-6587. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Citizens wishing to address the Council will, at this time, make known the subject of interest, so all may be properly heard. A) Introduction of Mayor' s Appointees B) Proc mation - Education Day C) Regional Justice Center Update 1 D) Task Force Report on School Impact Fees l Kent City Council Meeting Date November 19 , 1996 Category Public Hearings 1. SUBJECT: 1997 BUDGET - ORDINANCE 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: The public hearing on the 1997 Budget has been continued to this date. Public input is desired and welcome. The 1997 Budget totals approximately $91, 233 , 825 and the Budget is in balance with no rate increase. The Budget Document is available at the City Clerk' s Office. The Finance Director will give a brief presentation. 3 . EXHIBITS: 1997 Preliminary Budget document (available in City Clerk's Office) and ordinance, including Exhibits A & B 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Operations Committee (3-0) - (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES X 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: various per 1997 Budget ordinance OPEN HEARING: PUBLIC INPUT: CLOSE HEARING: 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moveeq( Councilmember� O.n secondeoc to adopt Ordinance No. c adopting the final 1997 Budget. DISCUSSION: ACTION Council Agenda Item No. 2A Memo Date: November 14, 1996 To: Council From: May Miller, Director of Finance Subject: 1997 BUDGET As recommended by the Operations Committee at their November 13 meeting, authorization is requested to adopt the 1997 Budget as presented in the Preliminary Budget documr131 i1nd Exhibits A and B. A few technical changes are included in the attached exhibits and were reviewed by the Operations Committee. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the Cary Council of the ,City of Kent, Washington, relating to budgets and finance and adopting the final 1997 fiscal year budget. WHEREAS, the tax estimates and budget for the City of Kent, Washington, for the 1997 fiscal year have been prepared and filed as provided by law, and the budget has been printed and distributed, and notice has been published in the official paper of the City of Kent setting the time and place for hearing, and that notice stated that all taxpayers calling at the Office of the City Clerk would be furnished a copy of the 1997 budget; NOW, THEREFORE, I THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Budget Adoption. Pursuant to RCW 35A.33.075, the budget for the 1997 fiscal year, as summarized on Exhibit A and as set forth in the 1997 preliminary comprehensive budget, as amended by Exhibit B, all of which are incorporated in this ordinance by this reference as if fully set forth herein, is hereby adopted in the amounts and for the purposes established in that budget as the final budget for City 1997 fiscal year. Section 3. Transmittal. The Finance Director shall transmit a complete copy of the final adopted budget to the Division of viunicipal Corporations in the Office of the State Auditor and to the Association of Washington Cities Budget Ordinance Section 3. Adjustments. City Administration shall administer the Annual Budget and in doing so may authorize adjustments pursuant to RCW 35A.33.120. Section 4. Severability. If anv section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance. Section 5. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force five (5) days from and after the date of publication of this ordinance. JIM WHITE, MAYOR ATTEST: BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORNL ROGER A. LLBOVICH, CITY ATTORNEY i 2 Budget Ordinance III it II PASSED day of 1996 APPROVED day of t996_ PUBLISHED day of , t996_ I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No. , passed by the City Council of the City of Kent. Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the City of Kent as hereon indicated. (SEAL) BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK i pi.ordinanc,,budpt-ord I Budget Ordinance CITY OF KENT,WASHINGTON 1997 BUDGET ORDINANCE EXHIBIT A Inc(Dec) Beginning Ending in Fund Fund Fund Revenues Expenditures Balance Balance Balance GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS GENERAL FUND 43,793,429 43.945,090 (151.661) 4,082.376 3,930,715 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS Street 4,722.939 3.889,067 833.872 528,279 1,362,151 Youth/Teen Programs 512.435 514,382 (1,947) 257,073 255,126 Capital Improvement 4,346,711 3,930,152 416.559 762,425 1,178.984 Criminal Justice 1,512,169 1,780,589 (268,420) 276,505 8,085 Environmental Mitigation 342,648 421.611 (78.963) 173,429 94,466 Community Block Grant 576,263 576263 Other Operating Projects 235,000 264.372 (1-9,372) 29,372 DEBT SERVICE FUNDS Voted 1,850,707 1,835,428 15,279 34,721 50,000 Councilmanic 2,807,429 2.807,429 Special Assessment 2,137,993 2,700,714 (562,721) 2,016,457 1,453,736 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS Street Projects 3,252.669 3.252,669 Parks Projects 265,929 349,844 (83,915) 83.915 Other Projects 203.000 203,000 PROPRIETARY FUNDS ENTERPRISE FUNDS Water 7,069,881 7,001,309 68,572 2.391,404 2,459.976 Sewerage 17,750.732 22.492,435 (4,741,703) 5,982363 1,240,660 Golf Complex 2,601,418 2.538,547 62,871 183.207 246.078 INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS Equipment Rental 1,920,941 1,933,802 (12,861) 1.936,927 1.924,066 Central Services 2.832,615 2,824,875 7,740 7,740 Fire Equipment 251.348 120,393 130,955 182.540 313,495 Facilities Fund 3,108,115 3,308.115 (200.000) 350.069 650,069 Insurance 5,316,177 5.671,742 (355.565) 3.982,312 3,626.747 FIDUCIARY FUNDS TRUST AND AGENCY FUNDS Firemen's Pension 206,380 209,150 (2,770} 2288,064 238 Economic Development Corp 15,330 11,085 4,245 12,445 I6..6990 TOTAL GROSS BUDGET 107,632,258 112.582,063 (4,949,805) 26.053.883 21,104,078 LESS: Internal Service Funds 12,137,194 12.137.194 Other Transfers 9 21 1,044 9.21 1.044 TOTAL BUDGET 86,284,020 91.233,325 (4,949,305) 26.053.383 21.104.078 CITY OF KENT,WASHINGTON 1997 BUDGET ORDINANCE CHANGES TO PRELIMINARY BUDGET EXHIBIT B Inc(Dec) Beginning Ending in Fund Fund Fund Revenues Expenditures Balance Balance Balance GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS GENERAL FUND 43,768,227 43,919,388 (151,661) 4,082,376 3,930,715 Police- Increase Public Education Specialist 5,490 (5,490) (5,490) Adjust Court space rental 5,530 (5,530) (5,530) Adjust for Criminal Justice revenues 29,267 (6,480) 35,747 35,747 Adjust fine revenues in Police (25,065) (25,065) 25,065 Transfer seized assets for Police ditty bags 21,000 21,000 Adjust contracts for legal services 15,000 (15,000) (15,000) Adjust Internal rates 1,800 (1,300) (1,800) Decrease contingency (17,138) 17,IJ8 17,138 ----------------- ---------------- -------------------------------------- --------- Total General Fund 41,793,429 43,945,090 (151,661) 4,082,376 3,930,715 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS Street 4,722,939 3,889,067 833,872 528,279 1,362,151 Youth/TeenPrograms 512,435 514382 (1,947) 257,073 255,126 Capital Improvement 4,346,711 3,730,152 616,559 862,425 1,478,984 Fire Station 75 Purchase 200,000 (200,000) (100,000) (300,000) ----------------- ----------------- ------------------------------------------------ Total Capital Improvement 4,346,711 3,930,152 416,559 762,425 1,178,984 Criminal Justice 1,469,203 1,723,357 (254,154) 262,239 8,085 Adjust per capita revenues/expenditures 21,966 36,232 (14,266) 14,266 Transfer seized assets for ditty bag purchase 21,000 21,000 ----------------- ----------------- ------------------------------------------------- Total Criminal Justice Fund 1,512,169 1,780,589 (268,420) 276,505 8,085 Environmental Mitigation 342,648 421,611 (78,963) 171,429 94,466 Community Block Grant 576,263 576.263 Other Operating Projects 235,000 264,372 (29,372) 29,372 DEBT SERVICE FUNDS Voted 1,850,707 1,835,428 15,279 34,721 50,000 Councilmanic 2,607,429 2,607,429 Fire Station 75 debt 200,000 200,000 ----------------- ----------------- ------------------------------------------------- Total Councilmanic 2,807,429 2,807,429 Special Assessment 2,137,993 2,700,714 (562,721) 2,016,457 1,453,736 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS Street Projects 3,252,669 3,252,669 Parks Projects 265,929 349,844 (83,915) 83,915 Other Projects 203,000 203.000 CITY OF KENT,WASHINGTON 1997 BUDGET ORDINANCE CHANGES TO PRELIMINARY BUDGET EXHIBIT B Inc(Dec) Beginning Ending in Fund Fund Fund Revenues Expenditures Balance Balance Balance PROPRIETARY FUNDS ENTERPRISE FUNDS Water 7,069,381 7,001,309 68,572 2,391,404 2,459,976 Sewerage 17,550,732 22,292,435 (4,741,703) 5,982,363 1,240,660 Adjust Metro charges to trend 200,000 200,000 ----------------- ----------------- ------------------------------------------------- Total Sewerage Fund 17,750,732 22,492,435 (4,741,703) 5,982,363 1,240,660 Golf Complex 2,601,418 2,538,547 62,871 183,207 246,078 INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS Equipment Rental 1,920,941 1,933,802 (12,861) 1,936,927 1,924,066 Central Services 2,830,815 2,823,075 7,740 7,740 Adjust Internal rates 1,800 1,800 ----------------- ----------------- ------------------------------------------------- Total Central Service Fund 2,831615 2,324,875 7,740 7,740 Fire Equipment 251,348 120.393 130,955 182,540 313,495 Facilities Fund 3,102,585 3,302,585 (200,000) 850,069 650,069 Adjust Court rent 5,530 5,530 ----------------- ----------------- ------------------------------------------------- Total Facilities Fund 3,108,115 3,308.115 (200,000) 850,069 650,069 Insurance 5,316,177 5,671,742 (355,565) 3,982,312 3,626,747 FIDUCIARY FUNDS TRUST AND AGENCY FUNDS Firemen's Pension 206,380 209.150 (2,770) 2,288,064 2,285,294 Economic Development Corp 15,330 11,085 4,245 12,445 16,690 TOTAL GROSS BUDGET 107,632,258 112,582,063 (4,949,805) 26,053,883 21,104,078 LESS: Internal Service Funds 12,137,194 12,137,194 Other Transfers 9,211,044 9,211,044 TOTAL BUDGET 86,284,020 91,233,825 (4,949,305) 26,053,883 21,104,078 Memorandum only-The proposed budget includes the conversion of one full time job share position in Fire for the SARA Title III program to 2 regular part time positions.This conversion results in no change in FTE's.The dollar impacts are already included,but notation of the position conversion had not been made. CONSENT CALENDAR 3 . City Council Action: �l �a,, n �A� movesq) Councilmember LAnz!2n Councilmember� secondedthat Consent Calendar Items A through R be approved. Discussion Action 3A. Approval of Minutes. Approval of the minutes of the regular Council meeting of November 5, 1996. 3B. Approval of Bills. Approval of payment of the bills received through October 31 and paid on October 31, 1996, after auditing by the Operations Committee on November 6 , 1996 . Approval of checks issued for vouchers: Date Check Numbers Amount 10/31/96 175609-176255 $2 , 274, 598. 05 Approval of checks issued for payroll for October 1 through October 15, 1996 and paid on October 18 , 1996: Date Check Numbers Amount 11/5/96 Checks 215392-215708 $ 250, 463 .71 11/5/96 Advices 39565-40027 584 , 444 . 46 $ 834 , 908 . 17 Council Agenda Item No. 3 A-B Kent, Washington November 5, 1996 Regular meeting of the Kent City Council was called to order at 7 : 00 p.m. by Mayor White. Present: Councilmembers Bennett, Clark, Epperly, Houser, Johnson, and Orr, Operations Director/ Chief of Staff McFall, City Attorney Lubovich, Police Chief Crawford, Fire Chief Angelo, Planning Director Harris, Public Works Director Wickstrom, and Finance Director Miller. Approxi- mately 40 people were at the meeting. Councilmember Woods was excused. PUBLIC Employee of the Month. Mayor White announced COMMUNICATIONS that Neldon Hewitt, Public Works Operations Utilities Superintendent, has been selected as Employee of the Month for November. He noted that Hewitt is responsible for managing and maintaining the sewer and storm system, and that he deserves to be recognized for long standing contributions to the Public Works Department and his many years of service to the City. Introduction of Mayor's Appointee. Mayor White introduced Linda Denny, his appointee to the Kent Arts Commission. Human services Month. Mayor White read a pro- clamation declaring November 1996 as Human Services Month in the City of Kent. He noted that the City Council has established that 1% of the General Revenue budget from the previous year will be the level of funding for human services, and encouraged all citizens to recognize and support Human Services Month. He invited citizens to visit the Human Services displays in the lobby of City Hall and at the Kent Library. The proclamation was presented to Brad Bell, who noted that in 1995 28 , 000 Kent residents were served. He added that the funding will service 16 separate agencies and 24 different programs. Bell expressed appreciation for the support and for the proclamation. CONSENT HOUSER MOVED to approve Consent Calendar Items A CALENDAR through K with the exception of Item G which was removed. Orr seconded and the motion carried. MINUTES (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3A) Approval of Minutes. APPROVAL of the minutes of the regular Council meeting and the Council workshop of October 15 , 1996 . 1 November 5, 1996 HEALTH & (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3H) SANITATION Newman Short Plat. ACCEPTANCE of the bill of sale for the Newman Short Plat submitted by Newman Construction for continuous operation and maintenance of 28 feet of storm sewer and 71 feet of sanitary sewer improvements, and release of bonds after the expiration period, as recommended by the Public Works Director. This project is located at S. 224th and 94th Avenue South. STREET (PUBLIC HEARINGS - ITEM 2A) treet Railroad Avenue Street Vacation VACATION Saar S STv_95-6. This public hearing has been set to consider an application to vacate a portion of Saar Street lying east of S. Railroad Avenue, as referenced in Resolution No. 1483 . Planning Director Harris pointed out the location on the map. He noted that staff recommends vacating ten feet rather than twelve feet as requested by the applicant, and that a 25-foot radius be provided at each end of the vacation. He pointed out that the staff report also out- lines conditions regarding retaining utility easements and being compensated as per City ordinance. Mayor White opened the public hearing. There were no comments from the audience and HOUSER MOVED to close the public hearing. Orr seconded and the motion carried. ORR MOVED to approve the Planning Director' s recommendation of approval of an application to vacate a portion of Saar Street lying east of S. Railroad Avenue, as referenced in Resolution No. 1483 , and to direct the City Attorney to prepare the necessary ordinance upon receipt of compensation and retainment of the utility easement. Bennett seconded and the motion carried. PUBLIC WORKS (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3E) ISTEA Funding. AUTHORIZATION for the Mayor to sign the ISTEA Grant Fund Agreement for Citywide Pedestrian & Bicycle Facility Improvements, and Pacific Highway South HOV Lanes and direct staff to accept the grant and establish a budget in the amount of $1, 336 , 000 , as recommended by the Public Works committee. 2 November 5, 1996 PUBLIC WORKS (BIDS - ITEM 5A) South 277th Street Corridor Pedestrian Bridge over Green River. Bid opening for this project was held on October 31st with nine bids received. The low bid was received by Donald Murphy Contractors, Federal Way, in the amount of $495, 843 . 72 . The Engineer' s estimate was $510, 070. 00. The construction of this bridge will facilitate transport of fill material to the west side of the Green river where it is needed. When the South 277th Street Corridor project is opened as scheduled in 1999, this bridge will become the bicycle/pedestrian bridge along that corridor. It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director that the South 277th Street Corridor Pedestrian Bridge contract be awarded to Donald Murphy Contractors for the bid amount of $495, 843 . 72 . CLARK MOVED that the South 277th Street Corridor Pedestrian Bridge contract be awarded to Donald Murphy Contractors for the bid amount of $495, 843 .72 . Bennett seconded and the motion carried. PLAT (OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4A) Canterbury Greens Preliminary Plat (SU-96-4) . This date has been set to consider the Hearing Examiner' s recommendation for conditional approval of an application by Canterbury Greens Associates for a 19-lot single family residential preliminary subdivision. The property is located south of SE 264th Street at 126th Avenue SE (if extended) . ORR MOVED to accept the Findings of the Hearing Examiner and to adopt the Hearing Examiner' s recommendation of approval with twenty-eight (28) conditions of the Canterbury Greens 19-lot single family residential preliminary subdivision. Houser seconded and the motion carried. HEARING (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3F) EXAMINER Hearing Examiner Decision Appeal Process. ADOPTION of Ordinance No. 3320 relating to the judicial appeal process of the Hearing Examiner' s 3 November 5 , 1996 HEARING decisions, as recommended by the Planning EXAMINER Committee. This ordinance will bring the appeal procedures for the Kent Hearing Examiner into compliance with the new State requirements under the Land Use Petition Act (LUPA) . COUNCIL (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3K) (ADDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT HOUSER) Council Absence. APPROVAL of an excused absence from tonight' s meeting for Councilmember Woods. APPOINTMENT (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3I) Rent Arts Commission. CONFIRMATION of the Mayor' s appointment of Linda Denny to serve as a member of the Kent Arts Commission. Ms. Denny has been a resident of Kent for more than 23 years and is employed by the Kent School District where she works at East Hill Elementary school. She has a degree in Art Education from the University of Washington. She has been active as a volunteer with the City of Renton as well as her work in Kent with Canterbury Faire and as Chair of the Juried Art Show. Ms. Denny will replace Frank Zaratkiewicz . Her term will become effective immediately and will continue to 10/31/97 . MAINTENANCE (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3C) Kent Commons Air Conditioning. ACCEPT as com- plete the Kent Commons air conditioning project and authorize release of retainage upon receipt of the release of lien from the Department of Labor. (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3D) Copier Contract. AUTHORIZATION for the Mayor to sign three year contracts with Copiers Northwest for 24 fleet copiers and with Xerox for one high volume copier for the printshop. PARKS & (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3G) RECREATION (REMOVED BY COUNCILMEMBER ORR) Youth/Teen Utility Tax ordinance. The Parks Department and the Parks Committee recommended adoption of Ordinance No. 3321 amending Chapter 3 . 18 of the Kent City Code relating to utility taxes by extending the sunset provision of the interim tax assessed for youth/teen programs to December 31, 2000 . In 1994 , the Kent City 4 November 5, 1996 PARKS & Council initiated a three-tenths (0. 3) percent RECREATION utility tax benefiting youth teen programs that sunsets December 31, 1996 . Orr stated that she removed this item from the Consent Calendar because of her concern about extending the tax for four years. She voiced concern about the amount of money spent on staff, and suggested reviewing this issue more often. SHE MOVED to approve the extension but for one year, through December 1997 . Bennett seconded and the motion carried. The ordinance was adopted as amended. (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3J) Lake Fenwick Restoration. ACCEPT as complete the Lake Fenwick Restoration contract with VLS Construction and release of retainage after State releases, as recommended by the Public Works Director. The original contract amount was $132 , 631. 56. The final construction cost was $123 , 830. 04 . BUDGET (PUBLIC HEARINGS - ITEM 2B) 1997 Budget. This is the second hearing on the 1997 Budget. Public input is desired and welcomed. Adoption is scheduled for November 19 , 1996. The 1997 Budget totals approximately $90, 801, 658 and the Preliminary Budget is in balance with no rate increase. The Budget Document is available in the City Clerk's Office. Finance Director Miller stated that this is one of the most conservative budgets in recent years. She noted that due to the manufacturing tax exemption, revenues decrease by approximately $1, 100, 000 in the General Fund. She explained that $1, 000, 000 has been set aside which could be transferred to the General Fund. She noted that the General Fund includes only one half-time position, and that there are 5 . 3 additional positions in the total budget. She outlined some additions such as bicycles for the Police Patrol and Court security, and noted that continuation of the Shuttle Bus program has been included, as well as sidewalk repairs, and other capital projects approved in the Capital Facilities Plan. Miller explained that the balance in reserve has been increased to approximately $600, 000, which is the highest amount ever. She noted that the 5 November 51 1996 BUDGET tax ordinance will go to the Operations Committee, and proposed that a dollar amount be adopted at the Council meeting of November 19 and be adjusted in December if necessary, since figures are not yet available. She noted that some technical changes will be discussed at the Operations Committee meeting. The Mayor opened the public hearing. There were no comments from the audience and JOHNSON MOVED to continue the public hearing on the 1997 Budget to the November 19 , 1996 Council meeting. Orr seconded and the motion carried. FINANCE (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3B) Approval of Bills. APPROVAL of payment of the bills received through October 15 and paid on October 15, 1996, after auditing by the Operations Committee on October 16, 1996. Approval of checks issued for vouchers: Date Check Numbers Amount 10/15/96 175000-175608 $4 , 080, 136.92 Approval of checks issued for payroll for October 1 through October 15, 1996 and paid on October 18 , 1996 : Date Check Numbers Amount 10/18/96 Checks 215076-215391 $ 551, 585 . 55 10/18/96 Advices 39112-39564 302 , 761. 38 $ 854 , 356. 93 MAYOR' S (OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4B) SALARY Mayor's Salary. The Operations Committee has recommended adjusting the salary of the Mayor to $60, 000 per year effective January 11 1997 , and to $75 , 000 per year effective January 1, 1998. Mayor White said it is his hope that there be no adjustment in the Mayor' s salary during the 1997 budget year. Director of Operations McFall explained that addressing the Mayor' s salary is a goal which was identified by Council during the Target Issue process. He added that a salary survey was done and was presented to the Operations Committee. JOHNSON MOVED that the Mayor' s salary be adjusted to $75 , 000 effective January 1, 1998 . Clark seconded. 6 November 5, 1996 MAYOR' s Paul Morford, P. O. Box 6345, Kent, said there SALARY are two issues--budget and ethics. He noted that ethics had been discussed in April 1994 and read a portion of a letter drafted by White during his campaign noting that he had led the fight to defeat the move to increase the Mayor' s salary. Morford expressed appreciation for the Mayor' s comments about not increasing the salary at this time. Morford stated that the previous Mayor had recomended $75, 000, and that the Mayor was to be the CEO and not have an Administrator. He said an ordinance was written to eliminate the Administrator' s position and to create the Operations Director position, which he feels is really the City Administrator, and that Council and staff know the city is being run by a City Administrator and not by the Mayor. Morford said that the salary should be set by the scope of work, and said that the Mayor of Auburn does not have an Administrative Assistant and his total staff is less. He said the entire budget issue should be looked at. He voiced concern about the ethics issue and campaign promises, and recom- mended that the salary set for the remainder of the term be what the Mayor had initiated in opposition to the committee meeting set by the previous Mayor, and that a committee be set up to look at the total staff requirements and scope of work that the Mayor does. He added that next term there may even be an issue as to the manager form of government. Orr spoke in opposition to Johnson' s motion, noting that she was opposed to the increase in 1997 at the Operations Committee meeting. She said she was also opposed to raising the salary to $75 , 000 in 1998 , and suggested looking at the entire administration as to costs and duties before setting the Mayor' s salary. She said that at the Operations Committee meeting she had suggested that $60, 000 would be an appropriate salary for the new term and that that salary be adjusted based on the kind of administration at the time. She said she would prefer that this issue go back to committee for further review before a decision is made as to the salary in 1998 . Epperly agreed that this should be looked at again. Johnson reiterated that the Operations Committee originally recommended that the salary be adjusted to $60, 000 in 1997 and to $75 , 000 in 7 November 5, 1996 MAYOR' S 1998 . He said that the Operations Committee SALARY looks at all departments including Administration to determine whether there should be staff reductions, continuation of programs, and so forth. He felt that sending this issue back to committee would delay it, and that staffing levels and the Mayor' s salary are separate issues. He pointed out that there will be two budget reviews before 1998 and said staffing could be changed then. Houser noted that the City Administrator position was eliminated when the Mayor' s position became full time. She felt that the salary issue and staffing are tied together, and said she would be more comfortable if an ordinance raising the salary for the Mayor were brought back. Clark pointed out that the city is not the same as it was when the full time mayor position was created, and that Kent is suddenly the loth largest city in the state which was not antici- pated at the time. He added that the city now has responsibility for a larger area and a larger population, and that more dramatic changes are expected downtown with the opening of the Regional Justice Center. He stated that if this issue is drawn out, it will be under discussion during a mayoral election year. He urged that this issue be handled promptly. Bennett said that he was not able to attend the Operations Committee meeting due to an illness in his family, and therefore did not have the opportunity to discuss this issue. He said he is not opposed to an increase in the Mayor' s salary, but that he is uncomfortable with not having been at the meeting to discuss it and that the only reason it moved forward was because he was not there. Orr said that the city was aware of the annexa- tions for a number of years beforehand, and agreed that setting the salary for the mayor during an election year can be difficult. She explained that when running for Mayor, White suggested a salary of $50, 000 and she agreed. She said the Operations Committee meets at least two more times before the end of the year and that a recommendation can be made for an appropriate salary. She said it may even be possible to look at the administration as a whole 8 November 5 , 1996 MAYOR' S by January of next year. She said the salary as SALARY it has been is appropriate, but it should be looked at before setting a figure for 1998 . The motion to adjust the Mayor' s salary to $75, 000 effective January 1, 1998 then failed, with Clark and Johnson in favor and Bennett, Epperly, Houser and Orr opposed. Mayor White reminded Councilmembers that this issue came to them because it was one of their priority issues, and that if it is addressed further, it will be at their prerogative. He said that staffing issues are addressed in the budget, that Council has approved the current staffing levels, and that it is their prerogative to adjust those staffing levels at any time. REPORTS Council President. Houser reminded Council- members that the Suburban Cities dinner will be held on November 13 in Tukwila, and asked that they contact Ms. Banister. Operations. Johnson noted that the next meeting will be held at 4 : 30 on November 6th. Public Works. Clark noted that the next meeting will be held at 3 : 30 on November 6th. Planning. Orr noted that the next meeting will be held at 4 : 00 on November 19th. EXECUTIVE Administrative Reports. At 7 : 40 p.m. , McFall SESSION reminded Council of an executive session of approximately twenty minutes to discuss negotiations for property acquisition and matters of litigation. The meeting reconvened at 8 : 25 p.m. PROPERTY HOUSER MOVED to authorize establishment of a ACQUISITION budget of $200, 000 for the purchase and develop- ment of the Cavender Property for museum parking, contingent upon approval by the Hearing Examiner (Parks of the conditional use application to utilize the Department) Keck home as a museum and/or public meeting facility, and subject to final approval of the Real Estate Purchase and Sale Agreement by the City Attorney. Epperly seconded and the motion carried with Bennett opposed. 9 November 5, 1996 PROPERTY BENNETT MOVED that the Mayor be authorized to ACQUISITION sign and enter into a Real Estate Purchase and Sale Agreement with King County Fire Protection District No. 37 for the purchase of Fire Station (Fire No. 75 in the amount of $1, 913 , 578 . 96, and to Department) adjust the Capital Improvement Budget to reflect the $100, 000 down payment payable in 1996. Johnson seconded and the motion carried. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 8 : 30 p.m. a_e� /�'2Bre�nda Jac er, CMC City Cler 10 /� Kent City Council Meeting Date November 5, 1996 Category Consent Calendar 1 . SUBJECT: SALT AIR HILLS VISTA PARK MASTER PLAN - APPROVAL AND ADOPTION 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Approval and adoption of the master plan for Salt Air Hills Vista Park, as presented by colie Hough of Hough, Beck & Baird Landscape Architects, and as approved at the Parks Committee meeting on November 51 1996. Several years ago the City purchased two acres from a King County Conservation Futures Grant to develop the Salt Air Hills site. Colie Hough-Beck of Hough-Beck & Baird was hired to develop a master plan of the park. Prior to master planning, a citizen advisory committee met twice and a public meeting was held to collect a list of the needs and wants of the community. A group of 30-35 neighbors participated. 3 . EXHIBITS: None 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Staff and Parks Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION• ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 3C )WI Kent City Council Meeting Date November 5 , 1996 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: 1997 CITY ART PLAN BUDGET AND 1997-2001 FIVE YEAR ART PLAN - APPROVAL AND ADOPTION 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: As approved at the Parks Committee meeting on November 5, 1996, and in compliance with the general procedures of the City Art Program (Ordinance No. 2552) , approval and adoption of the annual budget for all City Art Program projects and the Five-Year Art Plan. 3 . EXHIBITS: City Art Program 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Arts Commission, Staff and Parks Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES X 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $203 , 000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: City Art Program Ordinance No. 2552 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 3D CITY OF KENT PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT KENT ARTS COMMISSION 1997 CITY ART PLAN FIVE YEAR - CITY ART PLAN 5 CITY OF KENT PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT KENT ARTS CONIIVIISSION 1997 CITY ART PLAN PROJECTS Centennial Center Glass Installation 75,000 Japanese-American Community Artwork 50,000 Reclamation Art Project (3) 15,000 Portable Collection Purchases 3,000 Project Contingency (10%) 15.000 Subtotal $1589000 OTHER EXPENSES Administration 29,000 Maintenance, Supplies, 7,000 Insurance 1,200 Design Fee, Honorariums, Prof. Services 6,000 Postage and Printing 1.800 Subtotal 45,000 TOTAL $203,000 6 CITY OF KENT PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT KENT ARTS COMMISSION 1997 CITY ART PLAN Project Title: Centennial Center Glass Installation Project Description: A professional artist or team of artists would be hired to conceptualize, design, create and install a glass artwork in the lobby display case and possibly the adjoining ceiling in the recently acquired Centennial Center. The artwork would replace the glass artwork currently on display, which is the property of the previous building owner. Being an installation, the selected artist would have the ability to specifically design a work for the City of Kent, both in the dimensions of the site and possibly thematically. Estimated 1997 Costs: $75,000 Funding Source: City Art Plan Background: The Centennial Center has had quality glass artwork on display in the lobby since it was built. The City has the opportunity to continue this tradition and take advantage of a preexisting custom-built glass display case. The project will also continue the City's collection of important glass artwork, including Dick Weiss' stained glass windows at the Senior Center and Paul Marioni's and Ann Troutner's Glass installation, "Elements" at the Fire Department Head Quarters. Factors Supporting Project: 1. The project will complement the recent purchase of the Centennial Center by the City of Kent. 2. The project will continue and enhance the tradition of glass art in the building 3. The project will take advantage of the existing custom-built display case for glass. 7 CITY OF KENT PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT KENT ARTS COMMISSION 1997 CITY ART PLAN Project Japanese-American Community Artwork Projec�cription: A professional artist or artist team will be hired to conceptualize, design, create and install an artwork that recognizes and commemorates the rich history and culture of the Japanese-American community of the Kent area. Through a series of meetings with the Japanese-American community and others, it was determined that the artwork should reflect the diverse and rich history of this community, celebrating the many accomplishments and the spirit that survived adversity. It was also agreed upon that the selected artist should interact with the community, that the artwork be an exterior work and that it incorporate the agricultural and gardening history of the community. Estimated 1997 Costs: $50,000 Funding Source: City Art Plan Background: The Commission has had the artwork in the previous two five year plans. The Commission's desire is to utilize art to recognize and commemorate the important role Japanese- Americans have played, and continue to play, in the development of the Kent Valley. The Commission held three community meetings with members of the Japanese-American community and others in the summer of 1996 to help outline the project. The proposed site is the grounds of the recently acquired "Bereiter House". Factors Supporting Project: 1. The Japanese-American community is an important part of the history of the Kent area. 2. Public artwork is an ideal medium to commemorate the Japanese-American community. 3. mmission's desire to have artwork directly tied to the The artwork continues the Co community. 8 CITY OF KENT PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT KENT ARTS COMMISSION 1997 CITY ART PLAN Project Title: Reclamation Art Project Project Description: Continuation of the successful public art program that has area youth designing and producing artworks with a professional artist. Three projects are planned for 1997. The project sites and overall designs (mural, installation, environmental work, etc.) will be determined by the youth in cooperation with the artist and the Parks Department staff. Estimated 1997 Costs: $15,000 Funding Source: City Art Plan Background: The first Reclamation Art Project was completed by students of Kent West High School in the winter of 1994. The students painted the "Dig It" mural on the previously vandalized restroom/maintenance building at West Fenwick Park. Following the success of that project, four more works were completed in 1995 and two more in 1996 throughout the City. The response from the youth and the community has been extremely positive. Factors Supporting Project: 1. The project promotes the City's interest in working with youth. 2. Vandalism declines and money is saved in maintenance. 9 CITY OF KENT PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT KENT ARTS COMMISSION 1997 CITY ART PLAN Project Title: Portable Collection Purchases Project Descril2tion: Purchase high quality artworks from the Kent Canterbury Faire Juried Fine Art Exhibit. The artworks will be exhibited in the public accessible areas of the City of Kent buildings. Estimated 1997 Costs: $3,000 Funding Source: City Art Fund Background: The City of Kent Arts Commission has established a collection of portable artwork that includes paintings, prints and other works. The purchase awards at the Canterbury Faire Fine Art Exhibit bring a higher quality of artwork to the exhibit and allows the City to obtain artwork to enhance the public buildings. Factors S=12ortina Project: 1. Supports local artists and promotes participation in City programs. 2. Visual artworks enhance public buildings. 3. Artworks in public areas contribute to a successful and positive city image. 10 CITY OF KENT PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT KENT ARTS COMMISSION 1997 - 2001 CITY ART PLAN 1997 PROJECTS COSTS Centennial Center Glass Installation 75,000 Japanese-American Community_ Artwork 50,000 Reclamation Art Project (3) 15,000 Portable Collection Purchases 3,000 Project Contingency (101 o) 15,000 Administration/Maintenance 45.000 Approximate Year Total $203,000 1998 PROJECTS COSTS Public Participation Artwork 30,000 Downtown Mural 25,000 Reclamation Art Project (3) 15,000 Portable Collection Purchases 3,000 Administration/Maintenance 50.000 Approximate YearTotal $123,000 1999 PROJECTS COSTS Reclamation Art Project 15,000 Performing Art Center planning 10,000 Downtown Mural 25,000 Portable Collection Purchases 4,000 Administration/Maintenance 50.000 Approximate Year Total $104,000 11 CITY OF KENT PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT KENT ARTS COMMISSION 1997 - 2001 CITY ART PLAN 2000 PROJECTS COSTS Reclamation Art Projects 12,000 Performing Art Center Artwork 70,000 Portable Collection Purchases 4,000 Administration/Maintenance 55,000 Approximate Year Totat S 141,000 2001 PROJECTS COSTS Reclamation Art Project 8,000 Performing Art Center Artwork 70,000 Portable Collection Purchases 4,000 Administration/Maintenance 55.000 Approximate Year Total S137,000 12 Kent City Council Meeting Date November 5 1996 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: LID UNDERWRITER CONTRACT AND AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED WITH LID 345 BOND SALE 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Authorization for the Mayor to sign a three-year underwriter contract, with two one-year extensions, with Dain Bosworth Inc. , and authorization to proceed with Dain Bosworth Inc. ' s sale of approximately $781, 625 in LID bonds for LID 345. 3 . EXHIBITS: Memo from May Miller to Operations Committee 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Operations Committee (3-0) (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 3E Memo Date: October 31, 1996 To: Operations Committee From: May Miller, Director of Finance Subject: LID Underwriting Contract- LID 345 Bond Sale The City of Kent began an LID underwriter selection process in October 1996. Proposal letters were sent to area underwriters who had expressed interest in becoming the City's LID underwriter. Six companies submitted proposals per the attached criteria letter. All companies presented excellent proposals which made the selection process very difficult. After several independent and joint reviews, Dain Bosworth Inc. of Seattle is recommended as the preferred underwriter which most closely matched the LID underwriter needs of the City. Seafirst was selected as the second preferred company. Both companies submitted aggressive pricing which was one component of the selection; however, Dain Bosworth, based on the information submitted, was unanimously recommended as having the best marketing plan, experience selling similar LIDs, and the best creative solutions in different situations. They also showed commitment and interest in their follow-through questions and requested information on LID 345. The Committee would like to recommend selection of Dain Bosworth Inc. as the City's underwriter and authorize the Mayor to sign a contract for three years with two one-year optional extensions. The City, however, will reserve the right to hire more than one managing underwriter and/or sales agent. In this case, the City would recommend using Seafirst as the preferred additional agency. In addition, we request authorization to proceed with Dain Bosworth to sell approximately $781,625 in LID bonds for LID 345. This LID is for street improvements and for water and sewer stub extension to unserviced property. The 30-day prepayment period has passed and we are ready to proceed. We have attached the proposed bond sale schedule. COUNCIL ACTION: Authorize the Mayor to sign a three-year underwriter contract, with two one-year extensions, with Dain Bosworth Inc. Also, authorize proceeding with Dain Bosworth Inc.'s sale of approximately $781,625 in LID bonds for LID 345. ,�,',� Kent City Council Meeting Date November 5 , 1996 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: CENTENNIAL CENTER LEASE POLICY - RESOLUTION 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Adoption of Resolution No. /11$6 setting out policy regarding authority to enter into leases with tenants at the Centennial Center. 3 . EXHIBITS: Memo to Operations Committee and proposed resolution 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Operations Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 3F MEMORANDUM TO: COUNCIL OPERATIONS COMMITTEE FROM: BRENT MCFALL 4ull SUBJECT: CENTENNIAL CENTER LEASING RESOLUTION DATE: October 31, 1996 The attached Resolution sets out policy regarding authority to enter into leases with tenants at the Centennial Center. Under the proposed policy, administration would have authority to enter into leases that do no exceed ten years in length including all options to renew. In addition, all leases would be required to be at market rates and in substantially the same terms and conditions as in existing leases. Any lease that did not conform to this policy (which we do not foresee happening) would require Council approval. RECOMMENDATION Operations Committee move to recommend to Council adoption of the Resolution establishing a policy for leasing of vacant space at the Centennial Center to private tenants. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, establishing a policy for leasing vacant space at the Centennial Center to private tenants. WHEREAS, July 1, 1996, the City acquired the Centennial Center facility adjacent to City Hall; and WHEREAS, in acquiring this facility it was the City Council's intent to operate the facility for use by private tenants as well as for City offices; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to authorize the administration to negotiate and enter into leases for private tenants at the Centennial Building under certain guidelines so as to allow for the efficient management of the facility for the benefit of private tenants; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: City Administration is authorized to negotiate and enter into leases with private tenants for vacant space at the Centennial Center. The terms of such leases are not to exceed ten years, including all options to renew. All such lease agreements shall be for market rates and for substantially the same terms and conditions as set forth in the existing leases for private tenants of the facility. SECTION 2: Any lease exceeding ten years or for consideration other than fair market value for the lease or for terms substantially different than those set forth in the existing leases for private tenants of the facility shall require prior Council approval. Passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington this day of 1996. Concurred in by the Mayor of the City of Kent, this day of 1996 JIM WHITE, MAYOR ATTEST: BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: ROGER A. LUBOVICH, CITY ATTORNEY I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of Resolution No. passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, the day of 1996. (S EA L) BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK CENTLEA.res 3 �411/ Kent City Council Meeting Date November 5 . 1996 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: 1997 TAX LEVY - ORDINANCE 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Adoption of Ordinance No. .13 establishing the tax levy for 1997 . At their November 61 1996 meeting, the Operations Committee recommended adoption of the ordinance establishing the tax levy for 1997 in the amount of $14 , 489 , 025 for the general fund and $1, 850, 707 for the debt service fund. 3 . EXHIBITS: Memo from May Miller and ordinance 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Operations Committee (3-0) (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6. EXPENDITURE REOUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION• ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 3G Memo Date: November 14, 1996 To: Council From: May Miller, Director of Finance Subject: 1997 TAX LEVY As recommended by the Operations Committee at their November 6 meeting, authorization is requested to adopt the ordinance establishing the tax levy for 1997 the amount of$14,489,025 for the general fund and $1,850,707 for the debt service fund. These amounts are tentative as we have not received the final assessed valuation from King County. If the amounts change we will make an amendment at the December 10 Council Meeting. ;l ORDINANCE NO. i AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, establishing the tax levy for 1997. i WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 84.52.070, the City of Kent must, on or before the thirtieth day of November in each year, certify to the county assessor the amount of taxes levied upon property within the City for City purposes, provided that the county assessor has certified ,I assessed values at least twelve working days before November 30; and WHEREAS, the County has not. at this time, certified assessed values as required i by RCW 84,48.130 and is not expected to provide its certification prior to November 30, 1996; and WHEREAS, the City is relieved from its statutory obligation to provide its property tax certification if the County fails to meet its deadline, and WHEREAS, the City nevertheless desires to establish and certify the amount of taxes levied upon property within the City for City purposes while reserving its right to adjust that certification at the first regularly scheduled council meeting held after receiving the certified assessed values from the County; and Tax Levy I, i !i i WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 84.52.010 and WAC 458-12-365, taxes shall be levied in specific dollar amounts; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES j HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Recitals Incorporated. The foregoing recitals are incorporated as if fully set forth herein. i Section 2. _Levy. There is hereby levied against the property in the City of Kent, Washington, an assessed value for the City's 1997 municipal tax in the following amounts for the i following funds: i A. For the General Fund, for the purpose of paying the general expenses of municipal (rovernment: Levy per $1,000 of assessed valuation Fund (estimated) Amount General Fund 2.84008 $14,489,025.00 B For Voted Bond Interest and Redemption Fund. for the purpose of paying debt service in the following amounts for the following funds Levy per 51,000 of assessed valuation Fund (estimated) Amount Senior Housing 06858 5349,900.00 General ObligationRefiinding .29418 51,500,807.00 2 Tax Levy i i it Section 3. Limitation on Lew The application of the general fund levy shall be consistent with and not result in a tax revenue in excess of the limitation imposed by RCW 34.55.010. Section 4. Reservation of Rights. Pursuant to RCW 84.52.105, the City reserves its right to adjust its certified property tax assessment at its next regularly scheduled council meeting following receipt of the County's certified assessed values. i Section 5. Adjustments. Administration shall administer the Annual Budget and in doing so may authorize adjustments pursuant to RCW 35A.33.120. i i fSection 6. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this i ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, i such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance I Section 7. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force five (5) days from and after the date of publication of this ordinance. JIM WHITE. MAYOR ATTEST: BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK 3 Tax Levy i 1 I 1 1 1 APPROVED AS TO FORM: ROGER A. LUBOVICH, CITY ATTORNEY PASSED day of 1996. APPROVED day of , 1996. PUBLISHED day of , 1996, i i I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No. passed by the City Council of the City of Kent. Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the City of Kent as hereon indicated. (SEAL) BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK g Tax Levy Kent City Council Meeting Date_ November 5 , 1996 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: PARKING CODE AMENDMENT - ORDINANCE 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works Committee, adoption of Ordinance No. amending Chapter 9 . 38 of the Kent City Code relating to no parking zones, establishing new two-hour and thirty-minute parking zones and further authorizing the city' s Facilities Manager to issue parking permits. 3 . EXHIBITS: Public Works Committee minutes, Public Works Director memorandum and parking ordinance 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 3H we have been more successful with LIDS in the industrial, commercial and multi-family properties. In the past 27 years we have never formed a street improvement for a residential area. Thev are not palatable with the residents and thev are not successful when brought before Council. Lately we have required more up front improvements rather than the LID covenants. Jon Johnson stated that he has always been favorable towards the up front street improvements because it solves problems at the time of the plat, basically not having to retrofit something later on. With regard to arterials, Wickstrom noted when we don't know how the alignment will Fit and when we try to match piece-meal improvements, sometimes we have to design it to fit what's existing and in the long run it will change. When we look at all the roads we have built, most of those arterials are in now and have been built with the support of LIDS. Our trend is towards hard improvements up front. Wickstrom suggested that a formal form of policv from Council be given to direct us to require up front improvements. Brubaker stated that he will draft a Resolution for review and approval at the next Committee meeting. Permit Parking Ordinance Amendment Brubaker stated that the purpose of this Ordinance is to transfer authority to issue parking permits in the Centennial Center and Citv Hall from the Transportation Engineer to the Facilities Manager. During the discussion of this ordinance at the last Committee meeting, Leona Orr pointed out that this draft Ordinance established a 30 minute parking limit for the parking area between the Centennial Center and Citv Hall, v�,hich she found to be unacceptable. Brubaker stated there is no reason to continue with this 30 minute limit and it will be stricken from the Ordinance. Committee unanimously recommended approving the draft ordinance with the amendment of striking Section 9.38.OSO Sub-Section 8 from the Ordinance. Code Revision Brubaker said there is a Public Works provision in the Citv Code which states that Public Works projects shall compiv with the 198S version of the Washington State Dept of Transportation Standards Specifications for Roads, Bridges and Highways. This section should reference the latest version. Committee unanimously recommended that the Citv Attornev amend Section 6.02.010 of the Citv Code to incorporate the latest revision of the Wa State Specifications. Added items: Saar Street Vacation Wickstrom asked for Committee's concurrence that when the money for this street vacation is received, that it be deposited into the School Pedestrian Walkways fund. Committee unanimously concurred. S 218th Street Landscaping (LID 345) Mrs. Rust of 8619 S. 218th St. asked who was responsible for landscaping now that the S. 218th Street improvements are complete. Wickstrom said the Planning Dept requires property owners to landscape their property to the edge of the pavement. He said when we build a road, often times we require additional right of way from the property owner. When we remove the landscaping, it has been the practice that those properties become nonconforming with respect to their landscaping and they are not required to restore it. Meeting adjourned: 4:20 p.m. DEPARTNIENT OF PUBLIC WORKS October 16, 1996 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Don Wickstrom U k"` RE: Permit Parking Ordinance By City Ordinance two hour parking zone permits are issued by the Traffic Engineer in the Public Works Dept, for City officials to conduct business within the City. Since the recent purchase of the Centennial Center Building by the City, these parking permits are now issued by the Facilities Manager. As such, we are requesting authorization to direct the Citv Attornev to amend Sec ion 9.38. 170 of the existing Parking Ordinance to reflect same. ACTION: Authorization to direct the City Attornev to amend Section 9.38. 170 oc the existing Parking Ordinance to reject parking permits issued by the Citv's Facilities Manager. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, amending Chapter 9.38 of the Kent City Code relating to no parking zones within the City establishing new two-hour and thirty-minute parking zones and further authorizing the City's Facilities Manager to issue parking permits. WHEREAS, the City Council has established no parking zones within the City of Kent as authorized by state law; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to amend the City Code to update its no parking zones; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Section 9.38.060 of the Kent City Code is hereby amended to read as follows: See. 9.38.060. Two-hour parking zones. J be adruiffistered by the t1dffTL J ' J during V <a$. Except for section 9.38.070 and permits issued by the t1dfFiL veer city facilities manager under section 9.38. 170, at such times as the director of public works or designee shall place the appropriate sign, it shall be illegal to park any motor or other vehicle for an i uninterrupted period in excess of two (2) hours between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on either side of, unless otherwise indicated, the following streets public parking lots, public parkins garages or portions thereof: 1. Harrison Street (Fourth Avenue to Second Avenue). 2. Meeker Street (Fourth Avenue to State Avenue). 3. Gowe Street (Fourth Avenue to Central .avenue). 4. Titus Street (Second Avenue to First Avenue). 5. First Avenue (from a point two hundred (200) feet north of Meeker Street to Titus Street). 6. Second Avenue (Smith Street to Titus Street). 7. Railroad Avenue (Smith Street to Meeker Street, east side only). 8. State Avenue (Smith Street to Meeker Street). 9 Centennial Parkinu Gara;e� that oortion of the first floor as posted. 10. City Hall parking lot (between City Hail and the Centennial Building): All parking stalls unless otherwise posted. Provided that this section shall not apply on Sundays or holidays. SECTION 2. Section 9.38.080 of the Kent City Code is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 9.38.080. Thirty-minute parking zones. At such times as the traffic engineer shall place the appropriate sign, it shall be illegal to park any motor or other vehicle for an uninterrupted period in excess of thirty (30) minutes trm cithei side Uf, unless otherwise indicated, at the following locations: i it II 1. First Avenue: The first stall north of Meeker Street on the west side of First Avenue. I First Avenue: The first stall south of Meeker Street on the West Side of First Avenue. 3. Second Avenue: The first stall south of Meeker Street on the east side of Second Avenue. 4. Second Avenue: The first stall south of Meeker Street on the west side of Second Avenue. 5. Gowe Street: The first stall east of Railroad Avenue on Gowe Street, north side. 6. Fourth Avenue: The first stall north of Titus Street on the east side of Fourth Avenue. 7 Centennial Building The first four stalls on the east side of the building as posted. ,VCTION3. Section 9.J8.160 of the Kent City Code is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 9.38.160. Municipal parking facilities regulated; penalty. A. Parking shall be permitted at municipal parking facilities only in designated parkins areas, in the manner provided by law, and as limited in time or otherwise restricted by official signs, including parking permits issued by the traffic mmiguteercity facilities manager pursuant to section 9.38.170. B. Municipal parking, facilities for the purposes of this section mean any public parking area servin(y a municipal facility. Such facilities include. but are not limited to, the city commons, city golf facility, city senior center, all parks or recreation facilities owned or operated by the city, city shops, city hall, the Centennial Parking Garage and adjacent parking areas, the corrections facility and those public lots between Smith and Harrison Streets and Second Avenue and Fourth Avenue, Gowe and Titus Streets and Second Avenue and Third Avenue, and the Southeast corner of Second Avenue and Titus Street. 3 II I it C. Any violation of this section shall be an infraction and punishable by a monetary penalty of twenty-five dollars ($25.00). Vehicles in violation are subject to impoundment as provided by law. .SEC_4. Section 9.38.170 of the Kent City Code is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 9.38.170. Parking permits. A. The city council finds that it is necessary to have a system of s ecial arking permits to be administered by the city facilities manager which authorizes council members and the mayor to utilize existing two-hour parking zones and fifteen-minute narking zones at or near the city hall and other city facilities during regular business hours between 9:00 a.m. until 6:00 .m. necessary for the attendance of such officials at meetings and official business with the city. The city trMTTC erighreerfacilities manager is authorized to issue parking permits for city council members and the mayor on forms, cards or stickers as he or she determines to be appropnate and conspicuous. Such permits shall contain a rendition of the city's corporate seal or official logo identifying the holder thereof as an authorized user and member of the city council or the mayor and to be exempt from parking restrictions under this chapter, excluding disabled parking stalls. official business at two-hour parking zones provided Such permits authorize unlimited parking for under section 9.38.060 for Meeker Street and Gowe Street, and for all municipal parking facilities identified under section 938. 160. Any permits issued by the traffic � erfacilities manager under this section shall be signed by the trafficm=�acilities manager and issued for such periods as he or she deemstleernetl appropriate B. The city t� emaeerfacilities manager is authorized to issue parking permits for city corrections facility employees, Aukeen District Court employees, King County probation office employees and prosecutors whose municipalities use Aukeen District Court on forms, cards or stickers as he or she determines to be appropriate and conspicuous. Marked police vehicles and other police vehicles displaving exempt license plates may use the parking lot without being issued a permit. Such permits authorize unlimited parking for city or district court business at the lot southeast of the corrections facility at 1230 South Central Street. The parking lot shall be for the exclusive use of individuals with these parking permits except for any legally designated handicapped parking. The permits shall be signed by tapprropriate_ y�, s manager and issued for such periods as he or she domed a ro rate err_girreer. 4 I I I SECTION 5. If anv one or more sections, sub-sections, or sentences of this Ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect. I SECTION( This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law. JINI WHITE, MAYOR ATTEST: ------------- BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: ROGER A. LUBOVICH, CITY ATTORNEY PASSED day of 1996. APPROVED day of 1996. PUBLISHED day of , 1996_ 1 hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No. _, passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the City of Kent as hereon indicated. (SEAL) BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK P'\ORDINANC$KGCCN ORD 5 Kent City Council Meeting Date November 5 , 1996 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS CODE AMENDMENT - ORDINANCE 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works Committee, adoption of Ordinance No. 3-3-a5 revising Sections 6. 02 . 010 and 6. 02 . 020 of the Kent City Code to incorporate the latest revision of the Washington State Specifications for Public Works projects. 3 . EXHIBITS: Public Works Committee minutes and Public Works Director memorandum 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION• ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 3I we have been more successful with LIDS in the industrial, commercial and multi-family properties. In the past 27 years we have never formed a street improvement for a residential area. They are not palatable with the residents and thev are not successful when brought before Council. Lately we have required more up front improvements rather than the LID covenants. Jon Johnson stated that he has always been favorable towards the up front street improvements because it solves problems at the time of the plat, basically not having to retrofit something later on. With regard to arterials, Wickstrom noted when we don't know how the alignment will fit and when we try to match piece-meal improvements, sometimes we have to design it to 6t what's existing and in the long run it will change. When we look at all the roads we have built, most of those arterials are in now and have been built with the support of LIDS. Our trend is towards hard improvements up front. Wicicstrom suggested that a formal form of policv from Council be given to direct us to require up front improvements. Brubaker stated that he %%ill draft a Resolution for review and approval at the next Committee meeting. Permit Parking Ordinance Amendment Brubaker stated that the purpose of this Ordinance is to transfer authority to issue parking permits in the Centennial Center and Citv Hall from the Transportation Engineer to the Facilities Manager. During the discussion of this ordinance at the last Conunittee meeting, Leona Orr pointed out that this draft Ordinance established a 30 minute parking limit for the parking area between the Centennial Center and Citv Hall, which slit found to be unacceptable. Brubaker stated there is no reason to continue �%2th this 30 minute limit and it «,rill be stricken from the Ordinance. Committee unanimously recommended approving the draft ordinance with the amendment of striking Section 9.38.080 Sub-Section S from the Ordinance. Code Revision Brubaker said there is a Public Works provision in the Citv Code which states that Public Works projects shall comply with the 19SS version of the Washington State Dept of Transportation Standards Specifications for Roads, Bridges and Highways. This section should reference the latest version. Committee unanimouslv recommended that the Citv Attornev amend Section 6.02.010 of the City Code to incorporate the latest revision of the Wa State Specifications. Added items- Saar Street Vacation Wickstrom asked for Committee's concurrence that when the money for this street vacation is received, that it be deposited into the School Pedestrian Walkways fund. Committee unanimously concurred. S 218th Street Landscaping (LID 345) Mrs. Rust of 8619 S. 218th St. asked who was responsible for landscaping now that the S. 218th Street improvements are complete. Wickstrom said the Planning Dept requires property owners to landscape their property to the edge of the pavement. He said when we build a road, often times we require additional right of wav from the propertv owner. When we remove the landscaping, it has been the practice that those properties become nonconforming with respect to their landscaping and they are not required to restore it. Meeting adjourned: 4:20 p.m. 3 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS November 6, 1996 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Don Wickstrom RE: Code Revision Section 6.02.010 of the Kent City Code needs to be revised to incorporate the latest revision of the Wa. State Specifications. This is simply a "housekeeping" item and we are requesting that Council direct the City Attorney to revise same. ACTION: Recommend Council direct the City Attorney to revise Section 6.02.010 of the Kent Citv Code to incorporate the latest revision of the Wa. State Specifications. i ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City of Kent. Washington, amending Sections 6.02.010 and 6.02.020 of the Kent Citv Code relating to the adoption and application of"Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge and Municipal Construction," as published by the Washington State Department of Transportation and the American Public Works Association. to all Public Improvement Contracts. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Section 6.02.010 of the Kent City Code is amended as follows: Sec. 6.02.010. Standard specifications adopted. The latest edition of the Standard Specifications for Road. Bridge and Municipal a..� Construction. 1989 rr. =r as published by the Washington State Department of Transportation and the American Public Works Association, is hereby adopted by reference. One (1) copy of these standards is on file in the city clerk's office. I I SECTION 2. Section 6.02.020 of the Kent City Code is amended as follows: Sec. 6.02.020. Intention. It is intended irt a4opting that the standards adopted in section 6.02.010 that 4te herein shall eetttroi become the base specitications. subject to amendment by the City on individual projects, for the construction of city public works including streets. alleys, other public right-of-ways, sewers systems,water distribution systems, storm drainage systems. and all other welt facilities i . anti other ways where tite rttblie �Ifts aeeess therete. SECTION 3. The provisions of this ordinance are declared to be separate and severable. The invalidity of any clause, sentence. paragraph. subdivision, section or portion of this ordinance, or the invalidity of the application thereof to any person or circumstances shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this ordinance. or the validity of its application to other persons or circumstances. SECTION 4. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days from the time of its final approval and passage as provided by law. JIN/I WHITE, MAYOR ATTEST: BRENDA JACOBER. CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: ROGER A. LUBOVICH. CITY ATTORNEY 2 li PASSED the day of , 19_. APPROVED the _day of 19 PliBLISHED the — day of 19_. I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of Ordinance No. passed by the City Council of the City of Kent. Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the City of Kent hereon indicated. BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK STANSPEC.ord �Ifl� Kent City Council Meeting Date November 5 1996 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: MERIDIAN ASPHALT OVERLAYS - ACCEPT AS COMPLETE 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works Director, accept as complete the Meridian Asphalt Overlay contract with Lakeside Industries and release of retainage after State releases. The original contract amount was $197 , 727 . The final construction cost was $179 , 087 . 99 . 3 . EXHIBITS: Vicinity map 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Director (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT_: NO X YES 6. EXPENDITURE REOUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 3J :veZI- 1 ST w SE 248 ST I t sr •ufi Pcn. iY5 v m V BE 2us � m w P7 1 w � P = —v 260 ._rnr rrrurr J \9C 2.� .r s.:� - 50 ,. _ _ _- w �1y✓ SE 251 Si min =' SEw S L51 PL N 1 -c zsl -°`w Zy2 > PSI,, SE 252 PL 2`2 PL SE 252 ¢ sF 253 ii 253 5T N I C1 w w mv, PPIv. Pc uu'i ✓wi m sr — SE N — i M1�` '.,v rZSJa C� > an BE 5 a� �¢ > �254 PL 1Sr yo \ y SE tiw —✓\ %'Si2 N„SE 25usr SE255 sa N SE` S PL ^I PL PL 25fi PL 5E 256 PL ..I * I e°E 257� BE 25L o I 5E-2551 PL w =aec r eme m 5T _ P >I ❑ Ffff SE 258 ST JP sp zs> '`� __ ¢i d y w/sr cam; 258 e_ 2S3 ST 5c' �57 CT 9E a' - x e�uwi w SE 257 PL 5E —� SE 258 T p2ge m _1 m faster_-£ r�N• w _ w �_ /y 5E�86 PL��$E 253 CT C m J ml -r 1� E 25 Si ryi Sf 2g 5E 2`91ST ^I a '.BE PL9 20 ��L SE12`y :a ' - �A 9p 1=, �I" �250 N 6 5E "<50 PL sElE _ t 259 PL 50 x aarf m i0�� ,i SE 251 c'[ ^_I�> d Ic 51 Si r SE 1287 51 BE 251 ST \V sh :�\C°t C Ci ti 26. P� 'fit.iY 21a w SE P62 6E 262 Pl162 ryn 3 �. N 254 PL �!1_se�fi� k�NsEN- SF 264 S"1 se rn ;-.w `E 25"' �n - 5E/L64- 5E 263 r N' d IS 26Y T\ $F m N sr �a S , JT 4 SE 1255 ST Sy E 265 Lseassvcz:PL Nr v .Q v w SE 266 Sr r '� 1 �� '¢ ¢ °E 253 51 °_IC. 25o ST _ 2 0 �\ / G c 5E 2fi7 li� �J 5F 258 ST i2G F� ;u —�_268 ST P�1-o ST 1 6 m ! 5E 270 5T � s6 ¢ SE 2'0 y� II CI wl\ �"cam u• m c! SE 272 ST �� SE 272 ST _-� SE 272 PLev,5EI cr2 m I t wy BE 273 > 'E 2'_ P_ d 7Sll , Cr SEn 57 � I use > ¢ I wl Li4 y W P �5 "� N SE 2>Y C' SE� 6 `TI i SE 2' s 5.� 5- G t_ 1 c FL 5- 27- > Sc 27` c� I 5C�n6 PL >1 pf've rec. SE 2?6 W SE 276 P. `c 5- �n� 5E 2-o ST 2 .^� � S �7E 77 PL E ' 's4 al o� zJ' °� 277 PL �' s(E 277 PL 5 2?B 1ST SE 127e _ J v;hE cr Ir /�- c 778 P m � SE 2i9- � ,r 5E m G.1 _. r.;eT E jV m 5E :)9 PL eo"' 1 cE 280 ST 4PR Iy. > PR:'J. PROJECT LOCATION _ ISE� w w 1 t ¢� SE 282 sE c� - a �� SE 282 S °`v/ F �,/h- _I� - - m ----- --- - -- SE 252 ST _ ST ,`u„ ., c' — PFlV. SF 2P2 2e3 ST -� - - .:c 282 Si SE 284 ST _ 224 `T S PRIv. SE 284 `T PP,v. SE 285 _ =T TI2PG ST i r w � � r N w > > ¢ _ a SE 12SP ST _ K MERIDIAN ASPHALT OVERLAY 1996 Kent City Council Meeting Date November 5 , 1996 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: GREEN RIVER COURT APARTMENTS - BILL OF SALE 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works Director, acceptance of the bill of sale for the Green River Court Apartments submitted by Green River Court Apartments Limited Partnership for continuous operation and maintenance of 92 feet of water main improvements, 301 feet of sanitary sewer and 195 feet of storm sewer improvements and release of bonds after the expiration period. This project is located at 1401 West Meeker Street. 3 . EXHIBITS: Vicinity map 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Director (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION• ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 3K ? i - > v '^ 5 ?„1 FL / x m b 5 228 ST �— 5 22A ST e'C / S > G LANDING > m r C m Q NOVRC LN d � 1 F_r oI 5 264 S C 5 233 g wl alm Icciftlav 5 2S6 ST w CLiKENT5 ¢ W C:GUD7 S .; I L PQRK '.Q 9011LOROH Xi yaFrsO e` > 5 25] l 0LRYFIELO IC_7COr o > Ac fr y ¢ v: S 238 U i 5 M rC — G JAMES ST ¢(sT ,S 240 STI 5 2391t ypvE*Z ¢ yi ' �¢ ci C_UaR Si ¢I C aUSoEr A.BAQ- cf SRM `,i i /e ¢ ^I I.Z P Y GH Q IuJ 'ICNEHR 5] CI c! PARC ` 5M 1 TH 5T LOCATION[ITH ST cl FLl ul9N U E I TEnPE'r 5T m� o m 1 SMITH cT z� :uu c_ R9 itP,L IN ON I H RR 150N1= O(LfI" MRRR ISD< °i 7 ¢ XRRO� SEY JA / R J a 11 F_LC - Y�� si i 1 S 246 ST a �5 nc= REL > < 70W[ .SIT 1 t GOWE 5' Ix " WE I LAND 57 ec I1+t5 ✓<m �¢z _i�� =1 R ST rc ' �ILq ': CHEeAT z RN ST Ra�j I M9CL i 74cT SR 516 �NILL js .. !!�¢ c' GUIBE..95CN 57 l F L 1., ,.a _' `� �I Ia z E 5<RTT[E 5T E SERTTLE 5TJ zi _ w! h E'C:-iIGRGC ;T �l CF,t c'_Eaavt EX I/�� LAUREL Si c a EIHEMLOCH ST 4fl ¢ f� A, i cRRTE9 5RTERI FILBERT 2S7 ° ^sJEe H7 CCF£57 ' nFRrt _ CEv eflr ST _ COUFJ 5 2e2 ST 5 252 5T � � 'j`6j 5 262 I 5i NCR rR .a \ 5 256 Si — GREEN RIVER COURT APARTMENTS ?111 Kent City Council Meeting Date November 5, 1996 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: PARK COURT APARTMENTS - BILL OF SALE 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works Director, acceptance of the bill of sale for the Park Court Apartments submitted by Park Court Apartments Limited Partnership for continuous operation and maintenance of 192 feet of water main and 155 feet of storm sewer improvements and release of bonds after the expiration period. This project is located at 24510 64th Avenue South. 3 . EXHIBITS: Vicinity map 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Director (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 3L I I > j ST L7 � 7 �I S?28 ST 5 229 ST I eR / �28 � 5 c L ANG[NG QZ m ! NOVRC LN c} teen 5 234 IT S 233-� 1. _" '� wIw � I l\ S 23G ST �ICCMMOA' w C L`_ I Ygpr L =7 a HEYORlRL e ' - P4rtK r %e` W CLOUD S ., C 20111OflCN Ml YP lSJ > s z3T P�R7flEL0 CLOU 5 2..8 31 5 235 PL ' .cCfl GEI` P- Ww157 L 1 C( J C C^C, �I � �I21 JAMES ST ,in y > c_ I _I.,, S 240 ST� s z:9 rL MP(�4Sfl�-JlQPS < / Ktnr[>nncv5*Z' SRM ST J� 1 7 eePoev I >I >IIS.�EL RORQ 1 < Kpvt n I —aF�cT '1 'm rn {� acPK rL -+�"Ifl I E"PEFFNCE S I6SMITH 5T z ¢ tHK I _1 LL.I-` L II � 1 cMTTH! c, n. � a � e BP 96nun rev 1 v P^I. J 'o uH R9150NM uP(w. HRRRT c 3T O .+F_Lo yra c4 u•I 5i -� F r (S 246 ST) I� a E91 5 1 PPK1 1Qr I WE':SiT I E GOWc 5' J a WEIL.RN0 51 iP TZ { Iwa-_yt F! 0 c JMF cI '- .� LOCA 1 �ON! Jz c�� T iU5!S 9nK =jcn P-9r�P If II LL Il\1l 1 1 MGCL7N c \ VJS SR 516 a' GU I3E'EON ST E Si wa 1 ' `-a-*_ ST h �`' I Sc97TL`_ STJ 1 C // _� ` 9,9 �� PaFlm' • I nl �� 1> �_�it :.i1. E NCHiC;GO ST ' p f _ — yCn'I�GH e V'� c t e ) N� nl I WI a� - "�_: ra c I ml Ia Y D �HEML OCH 5T i I 'a �O f 1 ¢� s CPA E?. .T A`TEfiI FILSE�T h w a V] C m YWfliCY 11r�i 1CN � q W t i¢ N. S 2S, k IMAPL- F ree w .L CREST Paan _ vEiE�F a ( 5 259 5 T v s I 0'S/P ST e.e I ,e 5 2�2 s•' a?- I I w AVy Ij ¢ '•�tl� ; f a K rni li � ' NORTH S 256 5T 1 Gg> PARK COURT APARTMENTS ?_1-111 Kent City Council Meeting Date November 5 , 1996 Category Consent Calendar 1 . SUBJECT: 98TH AVENUE TREATMENT POND - ACCEPT AS COMPLETE 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works Director, accept as complete the 98th Avenue Regional Treatment/Detention Pond contract with Scoccolo Construction and release of retainage after State releases. The original contract amount was $1, 487, 750. 27 . The final construction cost was $1, 502 , 435. 29 . 3 . EXHIBITS: Vicinity map 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Director (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 3M si ' st dlblH nt R' � o• n x SE 1ST 7 ST S 216TH $ ST S Q v 2 H ST K n E 219TIM ST SE tii,3TRIAL j 22DTH AREA i ST C O1 �, ST S 222ND ST SE 222ND 3 222HO ' ST �- x 12 7 1 _ 7 s[ 224TN ST 13 18 18 SE. W x Alt r h t O EE 2' s S NORT V SE x P « �I KEN x INTC 6 x r �. 226TN f x 2 ST 5 229TH 5 2 22TTH ar g� ST SE 224TTH PL 22STH 5T< PROJECT LOCATION bi i ow 229,,, \ < W _a PL r i (PW (Pvq m ti� SE 231 mod° rr 0 x 3 2313T SE 231ST gi ' pyU ST W 230TH � ST PL.. � VOVAK S 232ND ( �. < 5T f 2ND ' 232ND ST '• • � ST SE 232ND 07 3 94TH CT S � 1'�L ~�' � aas 5c 223 > a < Z N � �C`r h S 236TH r C mat o (M) < ST j NthVulat. 1, r x m XWISE 3671 r.0 h L' L,•'�'•f�ii LDRpH > o ~ SE 237T. WAY Y4 < < <CEH S.23-rTH PL h.I N A\1, •qe� O ; J 11 on (Pvt) E C < a S 23STM. _. ® I'` W x (�) SE 239TH ST POST < < : a cow 2 g 2 ~ OFFICE _ a a 240 24 pS ro .18 17 1 SE KENT M ILLA rt>S < Wx ti Ped0+ "'[ CAST HILL H1. 24 di: S 241ST rN ELEMENTARY RYSCHOOL E SCHOOL Athletic Fid _h < EER a Z S 24NDmZ ST E M E ST W f N S 243RD EMl< ET Z Z Z ST -4 %�AE KENT■ SMITH Sr Z S 44T • n G SE < SR. 'j VJ , ST W c r a R " CTR -,', .1 > "d W a ST c!-REITE"'... ! Cty i x d < T.JAM IES J(ERZ ST a �y rp h.• .^ .•v Y� sSCHOOL < W :r > ST 4r t 4y�q .�.�••�•.r. WEILAND 3 x W ! I' 6 7ACOMA 3T'C ST 247TH p < b EVE w < CHERRY �•' ,C� ST ryx _g C E D£AN ILL ST • ��t '^ QRTW AVC DFrTON111I TDI7aTMGMT Dmmn X141 Kent City Council Meeting Date November 5 . 1996 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: SAAR STREET VACATION FUND STV-96-4 - DEPOSIT AUTHORIZATION 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works Committee, authorization for staff to receipt funds from the Saar St. Street Vacation into the School Pedestrian Walkway Fund (R36) to address school pedestrian facilities issues. 3 . EXHIBITS: Public Works Committee minutes 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS : 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 3N Added items: Saar Street Vacation Wicicstrom asked for Committee's concurrence that when the money for this street vacation is received, that it be deposited into the School Pedestrian Walkways fund. Committee unanimously concurred. S 218th Street Landscaping (LID 345) Mrs. Rust of 8619 S. 218th St. asked who was responsible for landscaping now that the S. 218th Street improvements are complete. Wicicstrom said the Planning Dept requires property owners to landscape their property to the edge of the pavement. He said when we build a road, often times we require additional right of way from the property owner. When we remove the landscaping, it has been the practice that those properties become nonconforming with respect to their landscaping and they are not required to restore it. Meeting adjourned: 4:20 p.m. we have been more successful with LIDS in the industrial, commercial and multi-family properties. In the past 27 years we have never formed a street improvement for a residential area. They are not palatable with the residents and thev are not successful when brought before Council. Lately we have required more up front improvements rather than the LID covenants. Jon Johnson stated that he has ahvays been favorable towards the up front street improvements because it solves problems at the time of the plat, basically not having to retrofit something later on. With regard to arterials, Wickstrom noted when we don't know how the alignment will fit and when we try to match piece-meal improvements, sometimes we have to design it to fit what's existing and in the long run it will change. When we look at all the roads we have built, most of those arterials are in now and have been built with the support of LIDS. Our trend is towards hard improvements up front. Wickstrom suggested that a formal form of policy from Council be given to direct us to require up front improvements. Brubaker stated that lie %%rill draft a Resolution for review and approval at the next Committee meeting. Permit Parking_Ordinance Amendment Brubaker stated that the purpose of this Ordinance is to transfer authority to issue parking permits in the Centennial Center and City Hall from the Transportation Engineer to the Facilities Manager. During the discussion of this ordinance at the last Committee meeting, Leona Orr pointed out that this draft Ordinance established a 30 minute parking limit for the parking area between the Centennial Center and City Hall, which she found to be unacceptable. Brubaker stated there is no reason to continue with this 30 minute limit and it will be stricken from the Ordinance. Committee unanimously recommended approving the draft ordinance with the amendment of striking Section 9.38.080 Sub-Section 8 from the Ordinance. Code Revision Brubaker said there is a Public Works provision in the City Code which states that Public Works projects shall comply with the 1988 version of the Washington State Dept of Transportation Standards Specifications for Roads, Bridges and Highways. This section should reference the latest version. Committee unanimously recommended that the Citv Attornev amend Section 6.02.010 of the Citv Code to incorporate the latest revision of the Wa State Specifications. �� Kent City Council Meeting Date November 5 . 1996 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: CANYON CREST ESTATES FINAL PLAT FSU-96-6 - SET MEETING DATE 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Set December 10, 1996, as the date for a public meeting to consider a final plat application by Leroy Surveyors and Engineers. The preliminary subdivision was approved by King County and upon the Jones Hobbs annexation the final plat came under Kent' s jurisdiction. This plat is 9 . 44 acres in size, consists of 19 lots, and is located at 9612 S. 222nd Street. 3 . EXHIBITS: None 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Staff (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6. EXPENDITURE REOUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS• 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 30 Kent City Council Meeting Date November 5 . 1996 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: TRANSIT ADVISORY BOARD - APPOINTMENT 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Confirmation of the Mayor' s appointment of Paul Hammerschmidt to serve as a member of the Kent Transit Advisory Board. Mr. Hammerschmidt has been a resident of Kent for almost 10 years and is employed in Seattle. He also serves as an out of district volunteer with the Black Diamond Fire Department. Mr. Hammerschmidt will replace Jason Cooper. His term will become effective immediately and will continue to 4/30/98 . 3 . EXHIBITS: Memorandum from Mayor White 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Mayor White (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6 . EXPENDITURE REOUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 3P CITY OF LJy�� 1 i Jim White, Mayor MEMORANDUM TO: CHRISTI HOUSER, CITY COUNCIL PRESIDENT CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: JIM WHITE, MAYOR DATE: NOVEMBER 13, 1996 SUBJECT: APPOINTMENT TO KENT TRANSIT ADVISORY BOARD I have appointed Paul Hammerschmidt to serve as a member of the Kent Transit Advisory Board. Mr. Hammerschmidt has been a resident of Kent for almost 10 years and is employed in Seattle. He also serves as an out of district volunteer with the Black Diamond Fire Department. Mr. Hammerschmidt will replace Jason Cooper. His term will become effective immediately and will continue to 4/30/98. I submit this for your confirmation. JW:jb 2104th AVE.SO.. /KEVT.WAS[[ISG"ION 940i'-5bh/ FF1-1 plio 1.___nn i300/FA\#8"1-+';4 Kent City Council Meeting Date November 5 . 1996 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: LIBRARY BOARD - APPOINTMENT 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Confirmation of the Mayor's appointment of Mary Jene Heineman to serve as a member of the Kent Library Board. Ms. Heineman is a resident of Kent and is a member of the Friends of the Library. She was a volunteer at the Kent Food Bank for a time and is a frequent user of the Kent Library. Ms. Heineman will replace Karen Jordan, who resigned. Her time will become effective immediately and will continue to 1/1/2000. 3 . EXHIBITS: Memorandum from Mayor White 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Mayor White (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS• 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION• Council Agenda Item No. 3Q MEMORANDUM TO: CHRISTI HOUSER, CITY COUNCIL PRESIDENT CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: JIM WHITE, MAYON DATE: NOVEMBER 13, 1996 SUBJECT: APPOINTMENT TO KENT LIBRARY BOARD I have appointed Mary Jene Heineman to serve as a member of the Kent Library Board. Ms. Heineman is a resident of Kent and is a member of the Friends of the Library. She was a volunteer at the Kent Food Bank for a time and is a frequent user of the Kent Library. Ms. Heineman will replace Karen Jordan who resigned. Her term will become effective immediately and will continue to 1/1/2000. I submit this for your confirmation. JW:jb:kno IV, Kent City Council Meeting Date November 5, _ 1996 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION - APPOINTMENT 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Confirmation of the Mayor' s appointment of Rev. Ray Morrison to serve as a member of the Kent Human Services Commission. Rev. Morrison has served as Pastor at the Church of the Nazarene in Kent for the past two years. Before coming to Kent he served as the Pastor of the Nazarene Church in Olympia for 16 years. In his spare time, he enjoys outdoor activities such as camping and fishing and he and his wife have a small antique business in Kent. Rev. Morrison will replace Mac D. Culver, who resigned. His term will become effective immediately and will continue to 1/1/99 . 3 . EXHIBITS: Memorandum from Mayor White 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Mayor White (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6 . EXPENDITURE REOUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 3R MEMORANDUM TO: CHRISTI HOUSER, CITY COUNCIL PRESIDENT CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: JIM WHITE, MAYO DATE: NOVEMBER 14, 1996 SUBJECT: APPOINTMENT TO KENT HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION I have appointed Rev. Ray Morrison to serve as a member of the Kent Human Services Commission. Rev. Morrison has served as Pastor at the Church of the Nazarene in Kent for the past two years. Before coming to Kent he served as the Pastor of the Nazarene Church in Olympia for 16 years. In his spare time,he enjoys outdoor activities such as camping and fishing and he and his wife have a small antique business in Kent. Rev. Morrison will replace Mac D. Culver, who resigned. His term will become effective immediately and will continue to I/1/99. I submit this for your confirmation. JW:jb Kent city Council Meeting Date November 5 , _1996 Category Other Business 1. SUBJECT: HUMAN SERVICES MITIGATION CONSULTANT CONTRACT - AUTHORIZATION 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: On October 1, 1996, the City Council authorized establishment of a budget of $200, 000 for RJC Human Services mitigation and approved expending these funds, which were received from King County. Staff sent out a Request for Proposal to study the human services impacts of the Regional Justice Center. Staff has interviewed and selected a con- sultant, All For A Good Cause, to do this phase of the project in the amount of $74 , 380 . The Planning Committee took action on this item today, and Council is being asked to authorize the Mayor to sign the contract with All For A Good Cause. 3 . EXHIBITS: Memo and contract 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: City Council Planning Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember rh,2 moved Councilmember '&,4,6./>� seconded that the Mayor be authorized to sign a contract with All For A Good Cause consultants in the amount of $74 , 380. DISCUSSION: Q ACTION: f Y?A ._ Council Agenda Item No. 4A CITY OF LL\�tD V� Planning Department (206) 859-3 ) FAX (206) 850-- James P. Harris, Planning Director Jim White, 'Mayor MEMORANDUM November 19, 1996 TO: MAYOR JIM WHITE AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: LIN HOUSTON, HUMAN SERVICES MANAGER SUBJECT: CONTRACT FOR THE REGIONAL JUSTICE CENTER HUMAN SERVICES IMPACT STUDY Background In March of 1995 King County and the City of Kent entered into a mitigation agreement regarding the impacts of the Regional Justice Center (RJC). Appendix C of that Agreement provides for Human Services Mitigation. As part of the mitigation the County has given money to the City of Kent to study the impacts on the nonprofit human services delivery system and to develop a standardized data collection system for agencies. Citv staff has interviewed and selected a consultant to do the study in two phases: 1. Phase I begins before the RJC is open and will set up a data collection process and methodology to enable agencies to measure the impact of the RJC on human services delivery, and to apply for compensation for services. 2. Phase II begins after the RJC is open and will assess how effectively the human services system is serving users from the RJC and identify any gaps in services. Recommended Action 1. Authorization for the Mayor to sign a contract in the amount of S74,380 with ALL FOR A GOOD CAUSE to complete a human services impact study of the Regional Justice Center. LH/mp:a:rjc2.wpd/pg 2 cc: James P. Harris, Planning Director Carolyn Sundvall, Human Services Planner '20 ath AVE. SO_ (KENT.bV ASHIP'GTON gHpt�syys i TELEPHONE ^_UR {5n Ou FAR�.`I�9-.33a CONSULTANT SERVICES CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF KENT AND "ALL FOR A GOOD CAUSE" THIS AGREEMENT is made by and between the City of Kent, a Washington municipal corporation (hereinafter the "City"), and "ALL FOR A GOOD CAUSE", organized under the laws of the State of Washington, located and doing business at 12525 17th NE, Seattle, Washington, 98125 (hereinafter the "Consultant"). Recitals 1 . The City desires that the Consultant perform services necessary to conduct a human services impact study from the Regional Justice Center located at 401 North 4th Avenue Kent, Washington. 2. The Consultant agrees to perform the services more specifically described in the Scope of Work, dated December 4, 1996, including any addenda thereto as of the effective date of this agreement, attached hereto as Exhibit A which is incorporated herein by this reference as if fully set forth. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises set forth herein, it is agreed by and between the parties as follows: CONSULTANT CONTRACTIRIC HS IMPACT STUDY—Page 1 of 15 14:Nov 96 I. Description of Work Consultant shall perform all work as described in Exhibit A. Consultant further represents that the services furnished under this agreement will be performed in accordance with generally accepted professional practices in effect at the time such services are performed. II. Payment A. The City shall pay the Consultant, based on time and materials, an amount not to exceed $74,380 for the services described in Section I herein. This is the maximum amount to be paid under this Agreement for Tasks 1.1 - 2.4 in Exhibit A, and shall not be exceeded without the prior written authorization of the City in the form of a negotiated and executed supplemental agreement. PROVIDED, HOWEVER, the City reserves the right to direct the Consultant's compensated services under the time frame set forth in Section IV herein before reaching the maximum amount. The Consultant's billing rates shall be as delineated in Exhibit A. B. The Consultant shall submit monthly payment invoices to the City after such services have been performed, and a final bill upon completion of all the services described in this Agreement. The City shall pay the full amount of an invoice within forty-five (45) days of receipt. If the City objects to all or any portion of any invoice, it shall so notify the Consultant of the same within fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt and shall pay that portion of the invoice not in dispute, and the parties shall immediately make every effort to settle the disputed portion. CONSULTANT CONTRACTIRIC HS IMPACT STUDY—Page 2 of 15 14:Nov 96 C. In the event the Scope of Work is modified or changed so that more or less work or time is required by the Consultant, and such modification is reached by mutual agreement of the parties to this contract, the payment for services and maximum contract amount shall be adjusted accordingly upon agreement of the parties. Ill. Relationship of Parties The parties intend that an independent contractor-employer relationship will be created by this Agreement. As Consultant is customarily engaged in an independently established trade which encompasses the specific service provided to the City, no agent, employee, representative or sub-contractor of Consultant shall be or shall be deemed to be the employee, agent, representative or sub-contractor of the City. In the performance of the work, Consultant is an independent contractor with the ability to control and direct the performance and details of the work, the City being interested only in the results obtained under this Agreement. None of the benefits provided by the City to its employees, including, but not limited to, compensation, insurance, and unemployment insurance are available from the City to the employees, agents, representatives, or sub-contractors of the Consultant. Consultant will be solely and entirely responsible for its acts and for the acts of Consultant's agents, employees, representatives and sub-contractors during the performance of this Agreement. The City may, during the term of this Agreement, engage other independent contractors to perform the same or similar work. IV. Duration of Work The City and Consultant agree that work will begin on the tasks described in Exhibit A immediately upon execution of this Agreement. The parties agree that the work described CONSULTANT CONTPACTl111C HS IMPACT STUDY—Page 3 of 15 14:Nov 96 in Exhibit A is to be completed within 1,244 calendar days of the execution of this Agreement; provided however, that additional time shall be granted by the City for excusable delays or extra work, as described in Section VI.(D) below. V. Place of Work The Consultant shall perform the work authorized under this Agreement at its offices in Seattle, Washington. Meetings with the City staff as described in Exhibit A, Scope of Work, shall take place at the City's offices at 400 West Cowe, Kent, Washington, or at locations mutually agreed upon by the parties. VI. Termination A. Termination of Agreement If the City receives reimbursement by any federal, state, or other source for work described in Section I herein, and that funding is withdrawn, reduced or limited in any way, or the project is cancelled or substantially reduced after the execution date of this Agreement and prior to the completion of the work, the City may summarily terminate this Agreement. Termination shall be effective ten calendar days after Consultant's receipt of the written notice by certified mail. B. Termination for Failure to Provide Services Bargained For. The Consultant agrees that it was hired by the City based on the Consultant's representation that employees identified in the Scope of Work, attached CONSULTANT CONTRACT/RIC HS IMPACT STUDY—Page 4 of 15 14:Nov 96 hereto as Exhibit A. will be available to perform the services described in Section I for the duration of this Agreement. If any of the employees identified in the Scope of Work are unavailable to perform the services bargained for, for any reason, the City of Kent reserves the right to terminate this contract or renegotiate the amount of consideration. The consultant must immediately notify the City, in writing, if any employee identified in the Scope of Work is unavailable to perform the services described in Section I of this Agreement. Nothing in the foregoing language will alter the Consultant's independent contractor status. C. Termination for Failure to Prosecute Work or to Complete Work Satisfactori ly If the Consultant refuses or fails to prosecute the work with such diligence as will ensure its completion within the time frames specified herein, or as modified or extended as provided in this Agreement, or to complete such work in a manner consistent with the standard of care in Consultant's profession, then the City may, by written notice to the Consultant, give notice of its intention to terminate the Consultant's right to proceed with the work. On such notice, the Consultant shall have ten (10) calendar days to cure, to the satisfaction of the City or its representative, or the City shall send the Consultant a written termination letter which shall be effective upon the Consultant's receipt of the written notice by certified mail. Upon termination, the City may take over the work and prosecute the same to completion, by contract or otherwise, and Consultant shall be liable to the City for any additional costs incurred by it in the completion of the Scope of Work referenced as Exhibit A and as modified or amended prior to termination. "Additional Costs" shall mean all reasonable costs incurred by CONSULTANT CONTRACTIR►C HS IMPACT STUDY—Page 5 of 15 14:Nov 96 the City beyond the maximum contract price specified in Section II(A), above. D. Excusable Delays The right of Consultant to proceed shall not be terminated nor shall Consultant be charged with liquidated damages for any delays in the completion of the work due to: 1) any acts of the federal government in controlling, restricting, or requisitioning materials, equipment, tools, or labor by reason of war, national defense, or other national emergency; 2) any acts of the City, its consultants, or other public agencies causing such delay; and 3) causes not reasonably foreseeable by the parties at the time of the execution of the Agreement that are beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the Consultant, including, but not restricted to, acts of God, fires, floods, strikes, or weather of unusual severity; and (4) negotiated and executed supplemental agreements between the City and Consultant for Consultant to perform extra work defined as tasks not included in the Scope of Work referenced as Exhibit A. PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that the Consultant must promptly notify the City within ten (10) calendar days in writing of the cause of the delay. If, on the basis of the facts and the terms of this Agreement, the delay is properly excusable, the City shall, in writing, extend the time for completing the work for a period of time commensurate with the period of excusable delay. E. Rights Upon Termination In the event of termination, the City shall pay for all services performed by the Consultant to the effective date of termination, as described on a final invoice submitted to the City. After termination, the City may take CONSULTANT CONTRACT/RIC HS IMPACT STUDY—Page 6 of is 14:Nov 96 possession of all records and data within the Consultant's possession pertaining to this project which may be used by the City without restriction. Any such use not related to the project which Consultant was contracted to perform shall be without liability or legal exposure to the Consultant. VII. Discrimination In the hiring of employees for the performance of work under this Agreement or any sub- contract hereunder, the Consultant, its sub-contractors, or any person acting on behalf of such Consultant or sub-contractor shall not, by reason of race, religion, color, sex, national origin, or the presence of any sensory, mental, or physical disability, discriminate against any person who is qualified and available to perform the work to which the employment relates. VI I I. Indemnification Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, injuries, damages, losses or suits, including all legal costs and attorney fees, arising out of or in connection with the performance of this Agreement, except for injuries and damages caused by the sole negligence of the City. The City's inspection or acceptance of any of Consultant's work when completed shall not be grounds to avoid any of these covenants of indemnification. Should a court of competent jurisdiction determine that this Agreement is subject to RCW 4.24.115, then, in the event of liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons CONSULTANT CONTRACTIRIC HS IMPACT STUDY—Page 7 of 15 14:Nov 96 or damages to property caused by or resulting from the concurrent negligence of the Consultant and the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers, the Consultant's liability hereunder shall be only to the extent of the Consultant's negligence. IT IS FURTHER SPECIFICALLY AND EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD THAT THE INDEMNIFICATION PROVIDED HEREIN CONSTITUTES THE CONSULTANT'S WAIVER OF IMMUNITY UNDER INDUSTRIAL INSURANCE TITLE 51 RCW, SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS INDEMNIFICATION. THE PARTIES FURTHER ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THEY HAVE MUTUALLY NEGOTIATED THIS WAIVER. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. IX. Insurance The Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, employees, sub-consultants or sub-contractors. Before beginning work on the project described in this Agreement, the Consultant shall provide a Certificate of Insurance evidencing: 1 . Automobile Liability insurance with limits no less than $1,000,000 combined single limit per accident for bodily injury and property damage; and 2. Commercial General Liability insurance written on an occurrence basis with limits no less than $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence and $2,000,000 aggregate for personal injury, bodily injury and property damage. Coverage shall include but not be CONSULTANT CONTRACT/RIC HS IMPACT STUDY—Page 8 of 15 14:Nov 96 limited to: blanket contractual; products/completed operations/broad form property damage; explosion, collapse and underground (XCU) if applicable; and employer's liability; and The City shall be named as an additional insured on the Commercial General Liability insurance policy, as respects work performed by or on behalf of the Consultant and a copy of the endorsement naming the City as additional insured shall be attached to the Certificate of Insurance. The City reserves the right to receive a certified copy of all the required insurance policies. The Consultant's Commercial General Liability insurance shall contain a clause stating that coverage shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respects to the limits of the insurer's liability. The Consultant's insurance shall be primary insurance as respects the City and the City shall be given thirty (30) days prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, of any cancellation, suspension or material change in coverage. X. Exchange of Information The City warrants the accuracy of any information supplied by it to Consultant for the purpose of completion of the work under this Agreement. The parties agree that the Consultant will notify the City of any inaccuracies in the information provided by the City as may be discovered in the process of performing the work, and that the City is entitled to rely upon any information supplied by the Consultant which results as a product of this Agreement. CONSULTANT CONTRACT/R)C HS IMPACT STUDY—Page 9 of 15 14:Nov 96 XI. Ownership and Use of Records and Documents Original documents, drawings, designs and reports developed under this Agreement shall belong to and become the property of the City. All written information submitted by the City to the Consultant in connection with the services performed by the Consultant under this Agreement will be safeguarded by the Consultant to at least the same extent as the Consultant safeguards like information relating to its own business. If such information is publicly available or is already in Consultant's possession or known to it, or is rightfully obtained by the Consultant from third parties, Consultant shall bear no responsibility for its disclosure, inadvertent or otherwise. All data, documents and files created by Consultant under this Agreement may be stored at Consultant's office in Seattle, Washington. Consultant shall make such data, documents, and files available to the City upon its request at all reasonable times for the purpose of editing, modifying and updating as necessary until such time as the City is capable of storing such information in the City's offices. Duplicate copies of this information shall be provided to the City upon its request, and at reasonable cost. Any use or reuse of the documents, data and files created by Consultant for the City on this project by anyone other than Consultant on any other project shall be without liability or legal exposure to Consultant. Xll. Recyclable Materials Pursuant to Chapter 3.80 of the Kent City Code, the City requires its contractors and consultants to use recycled and recyclable products whenever practicable. A price preference may be available for any designated recycled product. CONSULTANT CONTRACT/RIC HS IMPACT STUDY—Page 10 of 15 14:Nov 96 XIII. City's Right of Inspection Even though Consultant is an independent contractor with the authority to control and direct the performance and details of the work authorized under this Agreement, the work must meet the approval of the City and shall be subject to the City's general right of inspection to secure the satisfactory completion thereof. The Consultant agrees to comply with all federal, state, and municipal laws, rules, and regulations that are now effective or in the future become applicable to Consultant's business, equipment, and personnel engaged in operations covered by this Agreement or accruing out of the performance of such operations. XIV. Consultant to Maintain Records to Support Independent Contractor Status On the effective date of this Agreement (or shortly thereafter), Consultant shall: A. File a schedule of expenses with the Internal Revenue Service for the type of business Consultant conducts; B. Establish an account with the Washington State Department of Revenue and other necessary state agencies for the payment of all state taxes normally paid by employers, register to receive a unified business identifier number from the State of Washington; and C. Maintain a separate set of books and records that reflect all items of income and expenses of Consultant's business, all as described in the Revised Code of Washington (RCW) Section 51 .08.195, as required to show that the services performed by Consultant under this Agreement shall not give rise to an employer-employee relationship between the parties which is subject to RCW Title 51, Industrial Insurance. CONSULTANT CONTRACT/RIC HS IMPACT STUDY—Page 11 of 15 14 Nov 96 XV. Work Performed at Consultant's Risk Consultant shall take all precautions necessary and shall be responsible for the safety of its employees, agents, and subcontractors in the performance of the work hereunder and shall utilize all protection necessary for that purpose. All work shall be done at Consultant's own risk, and Consultant shall be responsible for any loss of or damage to materials, tools, or other articles used or held for use in connection with the work. XVI. Non-Waiver of Breach The failure of the City to insist upon strict performance of any of the covenants and agreements contained herein, or to exercise any option herein conferred in one or more instances shall not be construed to be a waiver or relinquishment of said covenants, agreements or options, and the same shall be and remain in full force and effect. XVII. Resolution of Disputes and Governing Law Should any dispute, misunderstanding, or conflict arise as to the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement, the matter shall first be referred to the City, and the City shall determine the term or provision's true intent or meaning. The City shall also decide all questions which may arise between the parties relative to the actual services provided or to the sufficiency of the performance hereunder. If any dispute arises between the City and Consultant under any of the provisions of this Agreement which cannot be resolved by the City's determination in a reasonable time, or if Consultant does not agree with the City's decision on the disputed matter, jurisdiction of CONSULTANT CONTRACTIRIC HS IMPACT STUDY—Page 12 of 15 13:Nov 96 any resulting litigation shall be filed in King County Superior Court, King County, Washington. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. In any claim or lawsuit for damages arising from the parties' performance of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to compensation for all legal costs and attorney's fees incurred in defending or bringing such claim or lawsuit, in addition to any other recovery or award provided by law•, provided however, nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to limit the City's right to indemnification under Section Vlll of this agreement. XVIII. Written Notice All communications regarding this Agreement shall be sent to the parties at the addresses listed on the signature page of the agreement, unless notified to the contrary. Any written notice hereunder shall become effective upon the date of mailing by registered or certified mail, and shall be deemed sufficiently given if sent to the addressee at the address stated in this Agreement or such other address as may be hereafter specified in writing. XIX. Assignment Any assignment of this Agreement by the Consultant without the written consent of the City shall be void. If the City shall give its consent to any assignment, the terms of this agreement shall continue in full force and effect and no further assignment shall be made without the City's consent. CONSULTANT CONTRACT/RIC HS IMPACT STUDY—Page 13 of 15 14:Nov 96 XX. Modification No waiver, alteration, or modification of any of the provisions of this Agreement shall be binding unless in writing and signed by a duly authorized representative of the City and Consultant. XXI. Entire Agreement The written provisions and terms of this Agreement, together with any Exhibits attached hereto, shall supersede all prior verbal statements of any officer or other representative of the City, and such statements shall not be effective or be construed as entering into or forming a part of or altering in any manner this Agreement. The entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereunder is contained in this Agreement and any Exhibits attached hereto. All of the above documents are hereby made a part of this Agreement and form the Agreement document as fully as if the same were set forth herein. Should any language in any of the Exhibits to this Agreement conflict with any language contained in this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail. [Signatures on following page.] CONSULTANT CONTRACTl111C HS IMPACT STUDY—Page 14 of 15 14:Nov 96 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties below have executed this Agreement. CONSULTANT THE CITY OF KENT by by its its DATE: DATE: Notices to be sent to: Notices to be sent to: CONSULTANT Mr. James P. Harris Director of Planning The City of Kent 220 Fourth Avenue South Kent, Washington 98032 (206) 859-3390 APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST: Kent City Attorney Kent City Clerk CONSULTK.gen CONSULTANT CONTRACTIRIC HS IMPACT STUDY—Page 15 of 15 1 d-Nov 96 a 0 C7 m (D Cl C) a' d -• - m _ m 0 wo mCDCDc x � m o o m w m 3 mTm . 0 o n cn . CD 33 O O o CD DQ = 0 C m C = N CDcn m c o° CDQm a (Dm m � RL _ (D(n cn y0 CD n (D y Cl)< (D T (D(o 0 D m a � o oa � m a o `` N CD(� go c � mCD CDC a mn 0a = CD Tn O(D ( � (D ° 0 CL m o c) cncoa a Ho cn m Hn D2DUmO7 Ln. D (o (D ^ CD a s a < a 5 o Q a `D c `n o m u�i m < <_ < o (n < o CD $ a m o m m 3 (o , cn s _ o 0 - � m c=i 3 o < � m a o - CD a o CD °cam a � a (� m � N � �' moo. a � � �' o � 3 c N m m m � y o = m -. � m � m m a cn T _ Cr CD ci � m , (DD mm � c 0' N ° Q CD a O j '�` N (n (D C1 (n CD D) O � O CD O O CDCD (n a C 7 O CD cn 0 �. W -0 (D 0 <. 3 -n O O N -». w O� O ry �• CD < c C a 0 CD 0 `L a � C N � � D CD <^ m m = m 3 oa o ? m cn CDv m c 2 2 3 < a v (D c �, m C v -Q. a m a CD (n CD o 0 v, c o CD 3 a <CL _ CD o m �' p• � N a N (n v CC CD a1 N O w 3' n O 7 N O CD 0 N �< (3D I 'O = NCc = � — C' 6 cn ((nn O v 7r cn (D o CL CD CD D) (D (n a CD (D to N 'O CD 3 (n a `<l< 7 O 7 CD CD v N C ,< • • • • • • n O N (n 0 Cn (n 0 O O ^' o C o p p C (D C_ O O O (D �'`OG C N (D O N 3 y (D CL (D N O (D m �• (o O_ a 3 O c C1 � --y (n d (O CD (D T O T _O a d y 0 O O (D CL cn O n(O m 0- < N O (m cn `G v (D D O Vl o c m cc cn Cn Cn = =a o mX m = 3 � a) cn m 1 0 CD c CD CD = o' c m `n < Z7 (o a o oa l< o �. < ;- 2. 0 c o - o o m 0 cn r _ D3i r. T CD rm X O O (D G = 3 c (n v 7 p n 7 p n P o to CD ? O CT CO J co cc (D (� v J (M CD v -.. • • • • CD D1 • • m S (C to G CD m m cn 7C W T1 — m 0 CD m aC a) m X 7 o m 0 m C< ° < n o3 Gr. CD C) a m o a ° n3o a o . v o 5 a o m m ° ° m - 3 ° om0 mom m . o moo D � 0 < m CD I ° o � ° 3 I mC`< w m � o CD G O m C O (D v o � aaa m � 7 m °o ° � ; ym m o = m = o o- m 3 o m a 0 ' (n cn Gmmo � • 3 ; 3 in o m m m 1 o 3 y m 3 m � ° u a 3 GGG 0.o Q 3 orm -oa 3 mo ' m cM m >TCDmMI m M 1 CD m m m oa 0 o 3 3 ccnG 3 wo m m mO Gym o ° o < � o o cn , c m o o 3uo Z o W 0 o a Q c (C � CD 0 _3 m 3 ° n• v, 41 co m v o � m o m cn '0 to m N m n: m m m o v 3 ° 0 c m 3 cm. 0 m G m 3 y G m CD cn m m CD m m o o m m o 0 v ° m cn m 3 m o o aZ m 3 m m a3 0 CD o o o m °- m o 3 CD Cn ... 0 3 G N' -� CD N C m CC o a Z DOj a S o m ° mI 0 m N 2 m g m o co m Gm 3 �c m o m Cr o = m <n I - • c G o CD n = v c m - 3 CD m G = G cn o o� G Cr m ° 41 a CD 0 � CD � 3 � � � o m � � o CC � m CD m 3mG � w -l0 33o m m m < o 3m3C CD 0 c c CDCD CD nip `n3a `m CD a c CD cn CD m 3. m o cn 3 cr � o o m o o c cr CD OG. ° O Q Cn a CD CD G CD m C _ =' 3 G CD n m o m = O Q CD G3 O O O C m G , 3 = ... I m CD aco m < a m o �. 30 ? N < m S m . ' -� CD CD 0 o c < < o o m cn 0' 0) CL m S CQ co CD Q O N O O CD n O m N G (n a • n o W _ (AT1 = N O 3 m 'O O_ y j O m C m m G m m 00 0 C O o m 3 N C') N fmn N m o F m CD y n CD c 3 Cn 7 CD O O O O -, O CD CO O C. CC (Dv (D CD 0 G m `n 3 0 G O m N O .< C < 7 �f1 _— 0En m C `< O CD N W' = N 1 a n n 3 = n J c o CD a ID = °--� I a (D m G — O -mp D cn rn m a � n_• O (C O G O � (C =• N O cn ._ m C m m ° m t/1 O v O o n m d C) rL 3 0 n CD CD cD C) I �. �' m = p0 CD 0 Z 0 o - m J m K G O d o' Q Q 6 C J 3 N ul 07 CC a s N T N v A CD 4 CC D Cn J �! N (D a 0 Q �� m A CA ° ` ° c v p a m n N Cn N O v 3 Q Q a • • y ° Q � (O O c m O m (D CD O N O (D N (D N o m mCL Cn 6 CD CD ° C ° a a (n m w o a � `II °CD c � ° m o (D o � 3 cn (D M N O m O S (D �, O N p� CD N N M w 7 N ° N - CD p a N O C1 -_'f 3 O (D O• O< a a C 0 O n• y '•^. (D u a O n O N 7 ° O -° CD ? CD (1 N"" O 7 CO7 CL �; Q ? _ _ L3 �. a O 7 NCD w " N CD N ? N o 3 .=• IM O m 0,C] ,< ° Q a w O `? n N 0 N CD CD N O = O (D N n v y CD a v '-,' v D cD m � o 6 a s a N o m" o (n 4) m m v N n C s a ° c � ? °. o m 3• a m _ o ° r. of r. v = 3° n m 3 ° N o <_ ° w ° ° ° ° tli iv ° v m (O ° ° o ° ma nic (n c am gym ? d a ° iv � a � X mom ° ti d ° a � "- moo. CDcs = aN � ° a o ° m (OD —_ _ (D N °" N .N-. O Co 41 , — O O o CD N O W ^' N (D v ^. n `� D °- m c �7 � ° (D N o ° =' my fD Nm (D= ca 3 a 3 0_ ° ° y n ? CD O y Q J 3 s o ° 0 (D CD N 3 N O O O CD n N O -�CD N O (D �. y 0 7 Cy CD O O. N (D N O O = O (D 1. 7 CD (D C (D <FD- N CD in y m > > c CD ao 3 ° cOi Q �n c m * 3 a) (D N N -� O 7 N CA O T Q Dl — O CD Cl) fD O0 S N O CD CD y (D A O N CD -0 -0 O" (D ° `Z D) Q. (D c _.cn O C v N 3 0 a o o ° c ° ° m . = ° 41 < o CD r c ° C o CL m m N (o m CC cn (D m o v n • . 0 • • ' 7raCJ4 ° N CD �, O O (n 61 '° CD _' n o N 1 CD 0 u 3 O N CD(O Cp CD C O O (D N CD N (D N (D N .0 y (D �• < N C 'O (] NFD O (L] a N 3 00 01 I 00 1 3 CD (D O O N N M. 4 O (D (D y < (D m cr (D m N 3 , N 0 ° O O ° 13 O � Cll m (n x Q T T D L 1 i CD ° tD cm Q Q o 3 O (D V IV 1 j co 7 UY Cb CO N (O (+) (D CD (D V V V N w cn = 070 25 ] ¥ 0 � ® i2 ] CO § � @q § . . § \ § } 2f £ 7 & j § q % a : — , n ; _ E _ ; 0 S 2 \ o \ / ESE 0 CL0 \L _a � ° Ea) " / k � S2ij ilk3Ji \ ƒ e \ \=I 00 cr - 0\7 Eƒ£ 3 a c \ / § \ \ a ; {\ O ƒ c = @ \ ■ 92 \\ 7 m @- ° CD a k » 3 = E m a U) CD an e ; 2 \/ \ 3 = � � CD / ° CD CL � 2 5J /� ; § ED ( m \ - Z ° 7 ƒ ° I o ® \ § [ \ 0 _ § \ ) ƒ E \ � ! C Eas ° « SE 000 k + E / CD \ \ ± 2 �cr � � � S w2 \ � \\ k " M(o \ D CD / § ) \m / 3 Ex „ 2 E : 2= m = � w(D 0 § \ k2 \ 7 \C: CD \ / \ \ \ w CA I CD e gq of \ ® % 3 k / a3 \ @ _ - _ - - § ? t \ o = a (a m ) ` \ E a CD / \ \ I a 5 § \ / 0. 7 CD \ \ 7 ° e § . \ 5 E _ { % § 2 \ _ & k cn g § m Ca. \ ƒ ƒ ( ) _ /0 } / / g = \ co cc -4 = oCD c ° o • m m O < am io o a r 7R D m ID m m °C o o o y `� 03 a'. vCi 3 m � (D m m '< 'o - c O (D o o'7, ID CD 1Z m M Z Cj o ° Z �' °' m ° m m °' ° c° m CL cm y < w m cc`< cv o 3 mm a(c - °' - m 2 a w .a = 0 o � - o v c � m m J a o , � (D � o a D m c °� m m p Z7 m w c n m m > c 0 c m N m n� 3 m m (n c- o CD r. (n (D = ° a-Q a �. m c m O 7 T 2 3 C n o �• �' n CD CD F (C. m a m "O C (D C �• n m <cn ' m ° Pm . m cn m ° < a ^ m CO �' o o a y CD CD CDc (D n c c < ° c m O C c 7 m. m < `v N � D S p j C O n m � CD C C -0 C Q• f�D a o a (n c (D 3 a ;, � m m a u, y a c m m o m a m 3 m o m o v m m m U, • CD n �• m rn cy m = Q ai � N m m F o Q c 0- 0 � < - s c = -' 0 (D03 - cr a a 5 m 47 3 < F n -0 m < _v, m c n m o m o CD c, o m c y (D (D 3 c m m (o ° o m o 0 < ° � a. M o o m m (D m v cn o c m. o m C CD a 3 mCL Cl) a p < x cu (Dm CL 3 uci 3 m `D cn ca a a m n a g o o = x c < a) o o °' o °c (D N O �. 6 1. '' (D (D 2 a C v C C ca = a 0. CD CC CD M (D mcm < ° (. 3 cn 3 CD � ° C' O Dcn O (D O O CO S N ° n - ° � m m mm 0 c ( w a o• (D 0 m m cCL m o m A • (� co p (n 7 CC N C y c C C 3 c'1 y (D 3 G c W 7 O to 'Q 3 -07' (D -D m 'Q C '°O 0 3 o a vai Cm7 (D �. 3 C mL �wC c -0 U)� 3� o a m ° o n T c � T = m ° m o m a m y - c a 3 (D � n3 ° ((Dn m 0 (o (o o (D m c, o m 7 ° c c c m c a3 �. m (n cn as c 3 (n c � c ° c - m CD cc m m cu y aci o c c (n =� m _' _ (n m m m O m �' (D c N C O O (n (<D (D n 97 CD n. p �_ (D < X (D (Dy CD CJ N (D a D aoa�i D � n =. o 3 C.) o Li(n = m w o (a 7 N O (D N O (D O (D O co (D O co m � o v (n ¥ m 2 2 ~ � - - � o 03 0Cc a / > & mmo = w ; § ce / ƒ a / a . \] ; eR = e \% § § ? g ] / / q \ f / \ / % ® Mo / § @ � ® ] > 7 � 3 - - , CLo cL 3E � \ \ 2 \ \ ( 2 \ KZ§ d � E Eeg E7GZG2 & ) $ m � � m ) = 4a ■» ; ° � � \ g/ k CL ° E ) C] d3E ) § oom „ n n / \ = r � Com0\ CD a) ƒ E 0aCDn / r � 0 0 ( C kj \ /\ / � \ ( CL \ k \ \ ECD(D CD 2 2 (D " mom , , E : m g ƒ 9 55j § \ § \ \ \ ] { n \y \ $73 U) ) 77 ) C: a % ) ± 0 @ t : c � D3 / ) \ � § :3 E« o @ �7 Inc & 2 4 § G mm § \ _ $ 2 & E E = 22 a _ ;ac \ \ < q # ' + / � * § 7 a k k \ 2CD 5 a / k / E q \ / « k � = 9 § \ ƒ o \ cn \ ƒ q / » = CL y @ G \ ) \ CD = C 4,-,,'F CI I L.. I _. 3 PRDod 2166)363-1110 FAX (206)363-2044 n1 cn irw lai a a ! It I r 11/II /1996 ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE NOWOQreski Insurance Associates HOLDER.THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ,107/40 Meridian Avenue N. #210 ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. ,Seattle, WA 98133 COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE CCMPANY -avelers Ina Co Ext: A All For A Good Cause CGMPANY e Sylvie McGee 12525 17th N E COMPANY C Seattle, WA 98125 ..................... ._..._.............._............_....__..__.........__.............. COMPANY D t3VErTAGES _ . ...::. .xi : -THIS IS TO CE.R-nFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERI00 INDICATED,NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT,TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECTTO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN,THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE PCUCIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECTTO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES.LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. . ..__......................_.......__........_...._.._........._..._.._............._.._.................... ...................... _O TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER ' POLICY EFFEC'NE PCLICY EXPIRATION _ R DATE(MMMO/YY) DATE(MMICONY) ? LIMITS - GENERAL LIABILITY ' GENERAL AGGREGATE S....... ............. .................................. ..2, , X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY ........ "' ODO OOO PRODUCTS-COMPfOP... $_ 2,000,000 - CLAIMS MADE X OCCUR PERSONAL 3 ADV INJURY S A ! i lQ0 0 .. .............RY. _..1,000,000 580-952r18780 11/13/_ 6 11/13/1997 -----•- ----- -•-•- .. ...... OWNER'S 8 CONTRACTOR'S PROT ? EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000,000 X ; Employers Liabilit Fi �;; ;n ................ �...:.S 300,000 ...................... MED EXP(Arty one pemcn) - S 5,000, AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY X ANY AUTO COMBINE?SINGLE LIMIT S 1,000,000 ... _..____.._..___.__.. . __... ___ _..... . ALL OWNED AUTOS '- BODILY!NJURY SCHEDULED AUTOS ° :(Ps PImcn) -S A HIRED AUTOS :310-952!r19266 ......_11/13/1996 11/13/1907 _.._ .._.. _._. - BODILY INJURY _ S 'ION-OWNED AUTOS '.(Px accern) ' .....................................! E E PROPERTY DAMAGE S GARAGE LIABILITY :AUTO ONLY-EA ACC:OENT S ......................................... .: ..-... AU : OThER .HAN AUTO CNLY- ,.....: ........................... .......................; i E EACH ACCIDENT S .................................................................................... AGGREGATE S _EXCESS LIABILITY !EACH CCCURRENCE S UMBRE!LA FORM ....................................................................................... i i i AGGRE'i.ATE S OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM ...z_. ...__ _....___..__. WORKERS COMPENSATION AND ,CRY RY UMRS ER EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY E i E EACH ACC:CENT.. S - ....... THE PROPRIE-OR/ .' INCL ... ... ...-... ....... ... .... PARTNERSi E(ECUTIVE EL^IScASc-POLICYLMff S OFFICERS ARE: EXCL EL DISEASE-E.A EMPLOYEE S OTH EA GESCRIP'JUN OF OPERgT10N5/LOCA7IONSIVENICLES/SPEC:AL ITEMS 'ertificate Holder is additional insured as regards work performed for them by the named asured during the policy term shown. ERTIFIC 7EHOLDER CANCciLAI:+Gtf SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PC ULES BE CANCELLED 8Ec(JRE'H% City of Kent EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF,THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL E4CEAVCR TO MAIL )irector of Planning :IQ 0AYS'NRIT7,E4 NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE'—E-. James P. Harris SLIT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALLJMPCSE N0 OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY 220 4 th Ave. S. CF ANY KIND UPON THE COMPANY.ITS AG241`5 OR REPRESENTATIVES. Kent, WA 98032-5895 AUTHCRIZED REPRESENTATIVE LCORO25-S (TM5) Jean 'Moff=_tt/MOFF1 CACORB CORPORATION 19831 POLICY NUMBER: 630-952W3730 CONIMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY THIS ENDORSE-MENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. ADDITIONAL INSURED - OWNERS, LESSEES OR CONTRACTORS (FORM B) This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following: COMNIERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART. SCHEDULE Name of Person or Organization: The City of Kent, RE: Work performed for City of Kent Director of Planning, James P.Harris, 220 Fourth Avenue S, Kent,WA 98032 (If no entry appears above, information required to complete this endorsement will be shown in the Declarations as applicable to this endorsement.) WHO IS AN INSURED(Section II) is amended to include as an insured the person or organization shown n the Schedule,but only with respect to liability arising out of your ongoing operati ations performed for that insured. CO 20 10 10 93 Copyright, Insurance Se vices Office, Inc., 1992 Kent City Council Meeting Date November 5 , 1996 Category Other Business 1. SUBJECT: SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT REGULATIONS ZCA-96-6 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: The proposed Zoning Code amendment was recommended by the Land Use and Planning Board to revise the current single family residential development standards. 3 . EXHIBITS: Staff report, Land Use and Planning Board minutes of October 28 , 1996 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Staff (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6. EXPENDITURE REOUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACCTION: Councilmember /_/hJ�, moveed Councilmember seconded approve the Kent Zoning Code Amendment (ZCA-96-6) to revise the current single family residential development standards as recommended by the Land Use and Planning Board, and to direct the City Attorney to prepare the necessary ordinance. DISCUSSION: ✓�tn - ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 4B CITY OF tic: Jim White, Mayor Planning Department (206) 859-3390/FAX (206) 850-2544 James P. Harris. Planning Director October 14, 1996 TO: STEVE DOWELL, CHAIR, LAND USE & PLANNING BOARD FROM: FRED N. SATTERSTROM, PLANNING NIANAGER RE: PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING MAXIMUM PERMITTED DENSITY STANDARDS (ttZCA-96-6) BACKGROUND During the Planning Board's August workshop, staff reviewed recent ordinances passed by the Kent City Council relative to single family residential zoning. These ordinances, Ordinances 93268 and #3290,revised the development standards for single family zones and changed the titles of the zones from one based on lot size (such as R1-7200)to one based on a density factor(such as SR-6). Both of these ordinances are attached for your reference. Adopted in April 1995,the Kent Comprehensive Plan suggested changes to single family residential zoning regulations in order to allow for more flexibility in terms of building and site design, (SEE, specifically LU-10). Ordinances 43268 and 43290 were designed to accomplish this. Ordinance #3268 (December 1995) revised the development standards for single family zones by providing more flexibility for site design. For example, lot width, minimum lot size, and front yard setback standards were reduced while site coverage regulations were increased. Ordinance 93290 (April 1996) further clarified 43268 by providing a maximum permitted density", re-naming the single family zoning districts, and clarifying other minor aspects of single and multiple family zoning districts. The intent of these zoning changes was to permit greater flexibility in single family residential development in order to achieve comprehensive plan goals. As discussed at the August workshop, the implementation of Ordinance#3290 had an unanticipated. inhibitive effect on potential subdivision of"in-fill" lots. That is to say, lots which may have been subdivided under R1-12.0 zoning (for instance, a lot which was 24,000 sq. ft. in size) were prohibited from subdividing under the new SR-3 zoning. Under SR-3 zoning, over 28,700 sq. ft. are required in order to subdivide an additional lot. This inhibitive effect on subdivision seems to impact only in-fill lots which are generally less than an acre and where there are few, if any, requirements for dedication of land for roads or storm water purposes. Short or long plats which „ �r. -snrucr<m nsur-ssa;;n;i.rrn �i: 'inxvi.nuurpq� a.5 .;:�a AMENDMENT TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONNG October 14, 1996 Page 2 involve dedications or reservations of land for roads and utilities are benefited by the amended zoning standards. ALTERNATIVES AND ACTIONS Based on the Board's discussion of issues at the workshop, it was agreed that some modification of regulations should be initiated in order to rectify the abovementioned problem. Staff was requested to research possible alternatives and return in workshop to the Land Use and Planning Board. 1. "Grandfathering" ore-existing lots - The Board had suggested some sort of"grandfather clause" be implemented for lots which previously could be subdivided under the "old" RI zoning. According to the City Attorney's office, this option is not possible since zoning cannot be vested without a complete application for subdivision. Therefore, there is no valid way for the City to grandfather existing lots to previous zoning. 2. Chanre the "maximum permitted density" Ordinance #3290 specifies a maximum permitted density (MPD) for each single family residential zone. The MPD for the SR-2 zone is 2 units acre, for SR-3 zone it is 3 units acre, and so forth. These maximums are stated in Section 15.04.020 of the Kent Zoning Code: they represent rounded off numbers roughly equivalent to the previously RI-titled zones which were based on minimum lot size requirements. This alternative would convert the rounded off MPD's to mathematically precise numbers carried out to the first or second decimal. To illustrate: Zone Maximum permitted density SR-2 2.2 (2.18) SR-3 ).6 (3.63) SR-4.5 4.5 (4.53) SR-6 6.0 (6.05) SR-8 8.7 (8.71) Implementation of this alternative would give credit for fractions of an acre which may be critical in lot splits and other in-fill development situations where the size of the parent lot is generally less than an acre. AMENDMENT TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING October 14, 1996 Page 3 3. Do Nothine alternative Under this alternative, no changes would be made to the existing density standards of the single family zoning districts. THE NEXT STEP Following our discussion of this topic at the October 14, 1996 workshop, the Board will decide if it wishes to take this matter to a public hearing. If it does, the staff would suggest going to hearing as early as October 28, 1996. ORDINANCE NO. Z AN ORDINANCE Of the City Council Of the City of Kent , Washington, relating ter to single family resident'a1 design standards amending Chapter 15 . 04 of the Zoning Code to establish standards for minimum lot widths, minimum street D _ fJ a setbacks, maximum building coverage, maximum impervious sur_ac_ coverage, driveway dlmensicns , and minimum lot Size . , 0 5 j G� O the Clay of Len Comcrenens_�� Plan -� contains goals and policies eS wni Ch S'�_OCrt a VarletV O- i� - housing types and dens-ties thrcughcut t_-e City, including more s1:.ale-Lamely than multlfaT:11v reSldentlal developments , more flex-bility and innovation in terms o= vJ building and s' te des-g'' and reS=don__a- set• aCKS ; and W-E R-AS , the City of Ken- _omprehensive Plan contains goals and policies whiz` recommend expansion of ri tl lGC l � lam+ G 1' awl home ownership opport..n_t for a__ come gro_os ; and wj- =EAS , the City of Kent `ClT_r�n�nc_ e Plan contains goals and policies whir recommend a revised CalClllatlOR SVStem for determining mmaximum allowable single family density; and 4v'r__7?AS , the City of Kent Comprehensive Plan contains goals and pongees wHicn -r=cornme_nd _rcteCZlOn of the quality and Quantity of ground water L'_Sed for i u'llc 'riater s =Dues ; and WHEREAS, revised Ken: Zoning Code provisions for single family residential densities and develcoment standards, consistent with the abc-,re Coals and policies, have been prepared and reviewed, together with public comments obtained at two public hearings conducted by the Kent Planning Commission, and recommended for adoption by the Planning Commission and the City Council Planning Committee ; and WHEREAS, pursuant to FCW 36 . 70A. 120 , the Growth Management Act requires that jurisdictions enact development regulations Which are consistent with and implement the Comprehensive Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF K=NT, WAS_:INGTON, DOES HERESY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS : SECT-TON L. Subsection (E) of Section 25 . 04 . 005 is hereby amended as fellows : Sec. 15 . 04 . 005 . Agricultural district, A-l . The stated goal of the city is to preserve prime agricultural land in the Green River Valley as a nonrenewable resource . The agricu'iture zone shall actively encourage the concentration of agricultural uses in areas where incompatibility with ur:zan u'Ses will be minimal to aid in the implementatic n of those Coals . Further, such classification of prime agricultural land thus recognizes and encourages farming activity as a viable sector cf the local economy. A. Pri^ci_ally permitLed uses. Principally permitted uses are as follows : 1 . Agricultural uses , including any customary agricultural build'rc or structure, such as planting, cultivation and harvesting of crops , animal husbandrv, nurseries and cree_nhoL'ses and other agricultural occupations . 2 . one (1) single-family dwelling per lot . 3 . Group homes class _. 13 . SneClal jJc_'Tili t uses . The cllow-i ng. L'ses are permitted provided that they conform to the development standards listed in section 15 . 08 . 020 : 1 . Churches . 2 . Nursery schools and day care cen�_��rs . C. L'ScS . F'erm-tie... accessory uses are as r"ol lows : 1 . Guest cottages F_ct re�.ted or otherwise conducted as a busi-__ S . 2 . Accommodations for _=rm operators and employees , but riot —cccmmodatiens for transient labor . 3 . Roadside stands not exceeding four hundred (400 ) square feet in floor area, and not over twenty (20) lineal on any side, Lrlmarlly for the Sale of agricultural products on the preT:_tes . a_ . Customary 1ncide-.tal home cccllpaticns sub-" to the provisions o' section 15 . 08 . 0�0 . 5 . other accessory uses and huildincs cost✓madly appurtenant to a per,,-.tte , use 6 . For permitted uses , nazardo s substance land uses , including c"'_site hazardous waste treatment cr s�:orac= cilities , which are not subject to cleanup permit recuirements of chapter 11 . 02 and do now accumulate more than twenty thousand (20 , 000i pounds of hazardous substances or waszes cr any combi-_at-cn thereof at anv one ( 1) time on the __tom ' subject to the prcvisic___ of section 15 . 08 . 050 , except hazardous waste t rc......meat GY wn-c n a r e � C_.i_ _�__ --- , not permitted i: t:--c d_str_ct . uses are as =1.1CWs : 1 . General conditicnal use= as listed in sec--iCii 15 . 08 . 030 . 2 . For permitted uses , accesscry hazardous suhstance land = Which are not suh]ect to cleanup permit reme-_ts of chapter ii . 02 and which accu,L--'la== mere than twenty thousand (20 , 000 ) poi-:nds cf hazardcus suhstances Cr waste= cr any cemhlnatlen thereof at any cne ( 1) time on the site , su✓] cct to the c- section 15 . 08 . 050 , except cf-site hazard--us waste treatment or stcrag_ facilities , whip'": are not permitted in th_s district E . Development standards . 1 . Minimum lot . Minimum lot area is one thirtv four thousand seven hundred square feet- (34 , 700 ) . SECTION 2. Subsection (E) (2) of Section 15 . O4 . 005 is hereby amended as follows : 2 . Minimu_*n lot width. Minimum lot width is e— sixty ( -0) fees a . To determine minimum lot width for i rregular lots-,- a circle cf azDclicahie diameter (the minimum lct width Dern ttea) shay_ be scaled within the Droccsed bOL'ndarles of the lot , Droylded that an access easement to another lot 1s not include'! W=t_^_-T_1 the circles 3 . Maximu.*n site coverage . Maximum site coverage is thirty (30) percent . SECTION 3 . Subsection (E) (S ) of Section 15 . Ca 005 is hereby amended as follows : a . Minimum yard requirements. a. Front yard. Minimum front yard is twenty (20) feet . (1) Pcrcnes and Drivate sitar courtvard features may be built- wlth_n the front builr?ina back line . C b . Side yard. Minimum side yard is fifteen ( 15) feet . c . Rear yard. Minimum rear yard 1s twent:v (20) feet . d. Si de yard cr, Tanking street of core r lot. Minimum site yard on the flankina street of a corner lot is twenty (20) feet . 5 . Height Iimitaticn. The heiaht limitation is two and one-half (2 1/2) stories , r_ot exceeding thirty-five (35) feet . The h`iah- limitations shall nc: Gcp'ly to Earns and silos -crevidea thG t.-ev are not loc__ed within fifty (50) fee of any lot lire . 6 . Additional standards_ a . Structures for =eedina, housing and care Of Gn_mGls , e=eT:'t household p l� be set back fifty (50 ) feet from Gny property line . ID . See chapter 15 . C8 , p'ertaininc to ceneral and supplementary provisions , for r=_auirements ccr_cerning access,;ry buildi nas and aldi ticr_al Stara, e.x, s . C . The fe11owina uses are prch; b_rel : (1) The removal of topsoil fcr any purpose . 6 (2 ) Grade and fill operations , provided that limited grade and fill may be aDDroved as needed to construct buildings cr structures as outlined and D . (3 ) All subsurface activities , including excavation fcr U ideraround utilities , pipelines or ot- r underground installations , that cause permanent disrlloticn of ther surface of the lard. _ Temporarily disrupted soil surfaces _:-_all be restored in a manner cons-i St-nt with aar'_clllt�.�ral L'�-5 . (�) Dumpi-g cr storage of non-----.itsral solid or liquid waste, cr Of trash, rubbish or nCx i cu,s ma---r i a l s (5) :Iat violate sound Activities t aaricult-Ural soil and water managem-nt practices . SECTION a . Subsection (=) of Section 15 . 04_ . 005 is he_,..-b_ y amended by adding a new s'1b5-Coon (7) as follows : 7 . T?^XiIiL' li ce'_"viO15 c, r cove a?_. Maximum imceriou's surface coveraC= is CO o of t}"'ie total rarcel are a . EXCe':t for l CS L'Se; 1= a:7_r ;l t•,:i-3l DractiCes , t)7- ma:cimum imner7i1ous surface area allowed shall be ten thousand (10 , 000 ) sc.uare feet When the I= is greater than one acre SECTION S. Subsection (=) of Section 15 . 04 . 005 is hereby amended by adding a new subsection ( 8) as follows : 8 . zero lot line and clusterin_Q. Minimum lot width, buildinc setbacks , any minimum lct size reaualtions may be modified consistent with provisions for zero lot line and clu_terina he-sing development . F . S_grs . The sign regulations of chapter 15 . 06 shall apply. G. Ofrstre_t parking. The offstreet parking rez7uirements of c_napter _5 . 05 shall apply. SECTION 6. Subsection ( ) cf Section 15 . 04 . 010 is hereby amended as follows : Sec . 15 . 04 . 010 . Residential agricultural district, RA. The city has , through its R? and M�_ zones , the key to assuring efficient and attractive growth, it is essential that the city avoid Excessive zonin' T far in advance of demand. Rezoning of RA and M_? lands to more intensive use shall be predicated upon the CCcumentaticn of the need for additional residential , commercial or industrial land in to City. This documentation shall consist of a fiscal 1:7tDacz analysis showing that the Cmh_r lanes already zoned and accessible to municipal se=vices a_`= not Sufficient or _' itable tO accommodate demandi for ___- prCpCS=�d L'SES and that the market demand for the prcocsed development is A sufficient to generate the revenues necessary to provide municipal services , including but not limited to police, fire, streets, water, drainage and sewer, required by the project . A. principally permitted uses . Principally permitted uses are as follows : 1 . Agricultural uses , including any customary agricultural building or structure, such as planting, cultivation and harvesting of crops , animal husbandry, nurseries and C teen__^_O L'SeS and Gt_"1er agricultural occupations . 2 . One (=) single-family dwelling per lot . 3 . Croup homes class I-A. g . Special permit uses. The following uses are permitted provided that they conform to the development standards listed in section 15 . 08 . 020 : 1 . Churches . 2 . Nursery schools and-day care centers . C. Accessory uses. Permitted accessory uses are as follows : 1 . guest cottages not rented or otherwise conducted as a business . 2 . Accommodations for farm operat;:rs and employees , but not accommodatic'ns for transient labor . 3 . Roadside stand not exceeding four hundred (400) square feet in floor area, and not Over twenty (20) lineal feet on any side , primarily for the sale of agricultural aroducts grown on the premises .' 4 . CllStOmary 1nC1Qental home ccc,--oazlons s l3ject to the provisions of section 1-5 . 08 . 040 . 5 . Other accessory aces and buildincs CUStOmarily aopllrtenanz to a permitted use, exc=ct for cnsi_- hazaricus waste treatment and .s -c'rage =a 11 i r-e= , which arenot permitted in residential zones . D . Condi.icnal uses. Conditic-_al uses as follows : General Conditional usss as li s _ed i l eCt- 15 . 08 . 030 . E . D=valc�ment standards. 1 _ +�linilTii:� lot. Minima,-q lot area is �-- tnir�'✓ four tl)cusanc seven hundred (34 . 700) feet . SECTION 7. Subsection (=) (2) of Section 15 . 0 - 010 is hereby amended as follows : 2 . M_in_imum Iot width. `^inimum loz width is 100 ) feet . 10 a . To determine minimum lot width for 1rreciular lots , a circle of aDDllcable diameter (the minimum lot width Dermitted) stall be scaled w_th n the DroDcsed boundaries of the lct . Drcvlded that an access easement to another lot is not included within the circle . 3 Nrax;j,,;1m site cove age. Maximum site coverace is thirty (30) percent . SECTION S. Subsection (7-) (4 ) of Section 15 . 04 . 010 is hereby amer-ded as follows : 4 . ,Tir_;mum yard rem�ireTenis. a. Frcr_t ya-d. Minimum froth yard 1s twenty (20) feet . (1) Dorr hes and Dri vate and shared courtvard features may be built within the front building setback b . Side yard. Minimum side yard is fifteen fec c . Rear yard. Mir, mum rear yard is twenty (20) C . Side yardn O S1anki ng Street o corner lot. Minimum side yard on the flanking street of a corner lot is twenty (20) feet . 11 5 . ! eight limitation. The height limitation is two and one-half (2 1/2 ) stories , not exceeding thirty-five (35) feet . G . ACditicnal star_dards. a . Structures for feeding, housing and care of animals, except household pets , shall be set back f_fty (50 ) feet from an-,7 property line . b . See chapter 15 . 08 , pertaining to general and s'ap'plementary previsions , for recruirements --c-r-CerP_ing ac-cessory buildings and aaaiticnal sta_^_Gar_ SECTION 9_ Subsection (?) of Section ,15 . 04 . 010 is hereby amended by adding a new subsection (7) as fellows : 7 . laximiZm 1mcery4 Cu's Ccyerage. MaXJMUM impervious su'rfaCe CCyeraae is d0a of the total rarCel area , a . EXC=Dt for letS used for auricultu"'-I TDractiCes , t-.e maximum impervious Surface arc- l GW'�d s,ial be t=.-, thousand (10 . GC'C ) sou=re feet - when the lot is are-` r :^_an one acre , SECTION 10. Subsection ( ) of Section 15 . 04 . 010 is hereby amended by addinc a new su�scCtiOn ( ) as fO110WS Minimum lot and minimum iot Size regl-altieIIs ma"✓ ea mcdi ^i -d C^.nsis->n- 12 with provisions for zero lot line and clustering housing development . shall F . Signs. The sign regulations cf chapter 15 . O6 shall apply. G. Offstreet parking. The cffstreet parking requirements of chapter 15 . 05 shall apply. H. Develeprnent plan review. Development plan review is required when the property to be developed is classified as view property. SECTION 11 . Subsection (2_) of Section 15 . 04 . 020 is hereby amended as follows : Sec. 15 . 04 . 020 . Single-family residential districts . It is the purpose of the single-family residential districts to stabilize and preserve low density, single- family residential neighborhoods . It is further the purpose to provide a range of minimum lot sizes in order to promote diversity and recognize a variety of residential environments . A. Districts est=dished by lot area. The following single-family residential districts are establi she d: 1 . R1-20 : S; t1 .. _Xt--n thousand (16 , 000) s_sare feet minimum lot area . 1 Z -- Ninety six hundred ( 9 , 600) square feet minimum lot area . 3 . R1- 9 . 6 . ..- _ - --___- _ - _� Sev=_ntv six hundred ( 7 . 600) square fe=- minimum lot area . nifty seven hundred ( 5 . 700 ) square feet mir_imum lot area . -- Four thousand. (a , 000) square feet minimum lot area t3 . 1�1r 17i!'..i-in Z^Zi4na at`e, . M1r:1mum zon=nag area f=r the district i s fifteen t'=usand (15 , 000) R1-5 . 0 dist three ( = lets sallare feet (3 ) C . Maxi- Zn zorina area . Max mum zoni^.g area for tree RI-5 . 0 district is eic'nt (8 ) acres . =d r =r�-nitted u--- Principally permitt_ D . py inc_Pa11Y P--- uses are as follows : 1 . One (1) single-fami_v dwelling per lot . 2 . Crop and tree farm; roc . 3 . Group homes class I -A. C ar-_,_ r i=e= . Tn. fpl 1 047�.Z_'.S uses are E . p_-- -1 Permit L_C_ _ permitted provided they c^nform to the detie ccment standards listed in secticn 15 . 08 . 020 : 1 . Churches . 14 2 . Nursery schools and day care centers - F . Accessory uses . Permitted accessory uses are as follows : 1 . Accessory uses and buildings customarily appurtenant to a permitted use, such as Garages , carports and minor structures for storage of personal property. 2 . Rooming and boarding of not more than three (3 ) persons . 3 . Customary inci de-^-tal hc<<.e cccunati ions subject to the provisions of section 15 . 08 . 040 . G. Cond- t_enal uses . Cor_dit_o-_al uses are as follows : General conditional uses as 1' sted in section 15 . 08 . 030 . SECTION 12. Subsection _) of Section 75 . 04 . 020 is hereby amended as follows : -Develcument 1 . M-nimu_m lot. Minimum lot area is as follows : ^^ Sixteen thousand (le , 000) square feet . b . R1 _ . _ ---a Ninety six hundred (9 , e00) square feet . 15 c . R1-9 . E : - - - ---a -- a -- Se` enty six hundred (7 60ID ) square feet d . R1-7 . 2 : Fif v- , -� t =_ven hundred (5 . 700 ) square_ feet . e . R1-5 . 0 : --- Fcur thousand (4 , 000 ) sq"are feet . SECTION 13 . Subsect_cr. O (2 ) of Section 15 . 04 . 020 is hereby amended as fcliDws : 2 . M='-*-m m 1c� widt N_-_; : ,um lot width is as fcllcws : a . n7 -20 : .. b . R1-12 : Fifty (50 ) feet . C . R1-9 . 5- -- 7 F; -tv ( gin ) f d. R1-7 . 2 : - -1- F ' ftv (50) c eer e . R1-5 . 0 : _ _= 1 Forty (a0 ) feet . i . To determine mi -= -num lot width for irrecular lots . - circle of annlic -> > diameter (the minimum lot width Dermltted) c'_='' _ 'Le sc lej -- wj -h"n the rroccsed bcundar_es the lot , -rcvided that an acc_ _ - to anccher lot is nct Jnc_uc_a wj _-_n t17= c4r l - 17 SECTION 14 . Subsection (H) (3 ) cf Section 15 . 04 . 020 is hereby amended as follows : 3 . Maximum site coverage . Maximum site ccverace is as follows : a . R1-20 : Thirty (30) percent . 7crty five (4 5) percent . C . R1-9 . 6 : `_-- Forty five (45) percent . d. R1-7 . 2 : _= -; :- Fifty (50) percent . e -- cercent . SECTION I5. Subsection (H) (4) cf Section 15 . 04 . 020 if hereby amended as follcwS : 4 . MinimLL-n yard requirem nts. a . Front yard. m imum front yard is =? !^^ ; ten (10) feet . 1 . At least 20 linear feet cf drivewav sha-11 be provided between anv carace , carport or other c-imary uarklna area and the street Drocerty line With the exception of an allev croDerty line . 17 2 . Porches an; Drlyate and snared courtyard "e=tures m=v be bui1= within t^= front build_nc setback line . 3 . PrcDcsed front yards less than twenty feet in depth are subject to aDDroyal 'y the Pl=nnj --a D1rector. . based on review and recommends.- ion from the P'_bli c Wcrks Department relative_ t:c the exi stiP-Q and f tore tra-f_C vol um:eS and rlcht-cf-Piay r ecnLl re me'___s as SDec_f j e^.. in Ci._v C -_ Ccmcr_-_ins-ve Tra=—crta`icn Plan and City cf !Kent Cc._rst- '-'Cr-i or: c-=n dares b . c;c= yarc. !_n--um side rd is five (5) feet . C . ll o�. Y yar-1. Min-- -.um rear yard is d. Side yard CI --a '_.�1_-- street OL CCr__ IOt. minim::m c= vsrd on the EankinC street of a cc--_e_ lot is fifteen (15 ) 5 . Heignt limitation_. eight limitaticns are as follows : a . R1-20 : Two and cne-half (2 1/2 ) stories , not exceea�n_ tn_r 'y'-five (35 ) fee 15 b . R1-12 : Two and one-half (2 1/2 ) stories , not exceeding thirty-five (35 ) feet • C . R1-9 . 6 : Two and c;_e-half (2 1/2) stories , not exceeding thirty-five (35) feet . d. R1-7 . 2 : Two and cne-half (2 1/2) stories , nct exceeding thirty-five (35) feet . e . R1-5 . 0 : Two and one-half (2 1/2) stories , not exceeding thirty (30) feet . 6 . interior yards . nterior yards shall nct be com-cuted as a1- - of the site coverage . 7 . dditioral standaras . See chaps 15 . 08 , pertaining to General and supplementary Trrcv4 'ions , for reGu"_rements concerning accessory buildings and additional standards p rcVlded that solar access setback requirements of sectic_^_s 15 . 08 . 230 through 15 . 08 . 234 shall not apply to the R1-5 . 0 zone . SECTION 16. subsection (==) cf Section 15 . O4 . 020 r T addinc a new subsection (8) as follows : is here-v amended by 8 , Maximum S r`ace cov raC?. Max,mum im-cervlcu's surf ace cove-aces are as follows : a . R1-20 : Fercv (40 ) eerc_nc . b . R1-12 : Fifzv (50 ) nercent . i9 C . R1-9 . 5 xtv ( 50) percent . d . R1-7 . 2 : Seventy (70 ) percent . e R1-5 . 0 Sevemy five (75 ) perc nt f 7xcept for lots used for aar_cultu'ral practices , t_^= maximum lmpel—Vious surface area a`' lowe^_ s_.a11 =_ ten thousar_d (10 , 000) square feet SECTION I7-. Subsection (_) of Section 15 . 04 . 020 is hereby amended by adding a new subsection (9) as follcwS : a Zero lot: l i ne F=d wi^tn, bui l di = se-.^arks and min-i 'alum lot size regualtions may mod=_=-q cons1= =nt with prcylsions fOr Ze= lot line and clustering- housing de e lcpmen- i . Suns . The sign regalaz_or_s of chapter 15 . 06 s1_a11 Gp p-v- J. Or�fscreet parkir_c. The c _Street park-na reculG ors of c_ =vim=r r . 05 Sw11 Gnti'ly. K. Devel' prnent plan review_ 2evalopment plan review is required when the property to be developed is classified as view proc_rty. SECTION 18. Subsection (=) of Section 15 . 04 . 030 is hereby amended as follows : Sec . 15 . 04 . 030 . Duplex multifamily residential district, P• ?- D . 20 it is the purpose Of the M-R-D district to or--vide for a limited increase in poculation density and allow for a �; es b allowing duplex dwelling greater variety of housing typ_ y units . P_. Principally permitted uses . principally permitted uses are as follows : 1 . One (1) sincle-f mily dwelling par lot . 2 . one (1) duplex ^er lot . 3 . Group homes class I-A and I-B . S . Crop and tree farmirc. T'f goecia ermi 1. USes . "'e l�llo{/y-Ti� Uses are J permitted provided that they conform to the development st naardS =-- inc i sec icn 1 . 08 . 020 : �u lis_ 1 . Churches . 2 . Nursery sc:-oels and day care centers . C. ??ccesscry us=s- permitt-a acceSscry uses are as follows : 1 . Accessory uses and buildings customarily F-curtenant to a permitted use, such as garages , ca=cr..s and minor structures for storage of personal property. A"- of rct more than three 2 . Foomina and boar ( ) persons . 3 . Customary incidental hcme occupations subject to the provisions cf secticn 15 . 08 . 01_0 . D . Ccnditional uses . Conaiticnal uses are as follows : 1 . General conditional uses listed in section 15 . 08 . 030 . 2 . Group homes class I-C, II-A, II-B and II-C . E . Development standards. 1 . M=?71:17L'TlI 70t , Minimum lot area is as follows : Single-family dw_lli ngs : G '--•-' =-- �-. � � Fi f�V S=y=- 1hunCued .. ------ - - - ( 5 , 700) squGre b . Dun_ lex (twc-=amily dwell-ng unit) Ei---- thousand five ht:nd-r d (8 , 500) square feet . SECTION 19. Subsection (E) (2) cf Section 15 . 04 . 030 is hereby amended as follcws : 2 . 1'??II�Z!iuln lot wid-''l. r'?_n1m'um lot width 1S a5 follows : a . Single-family dwelling: Fi-ty ( 50) 1 . To determine minimum lot width fcr ir -=cular ic`s , a circle c' acc_ic='nle d= ameter ( the minimum lot width c=rmitted) shall be 22 scaled within the Drcocsed boundaries of the lot , provided that an access easement to another lct is not included within the circle . b . Duplex: Eichty (30) =_et . SECTION 20 . Subsection (-) (3) cf Sect.On 15 . 04 . 030 is hereby amended as fellows : 3 . Maximum site coverage. Maximum site coverace is as follows : a . Sincle-family dwellinc : ===1 Fift_j (5o) percent . b . Duplex: Forty. percent . SECTION 21 . Subsection (E) (4) (a) of cection 15 . 04 . 030 is hereby amended as follows : a Minimun y.G-dr reguiremsnts . a . Frcnt yard. Minimum front yard is =z= ten (10)1 . feet . at least 20 feet of driveway shall be prevideg' between any carace carocrt Or Ot_^_e' Drlmary parkin; ..� r he street. r— Dert.v l; ne ar- ., a_,d t__.. - - - ^T t l !ten L w=l n the eY,-Jl -J__ Ol an G, 1 ev 2 3 2 . Porches and private and shar=d courtvard features may be bun t within the front build na s=rback lino 3 . Proccsed front vards lass tha- twenty feet in depth are subject to approval by tha Planning Dir= ` cr based on review and reccmmendatjori from the Pub11'c Works Deoartmen- relative to the existina and fu-_re traff-C ycllmeS a-d richt-o -way ra^uir - soa^iriad , n the C-ty C Kent L.�.imP_r=henslye T -an-:;Or_aticn Dl _n and City O Kent Ccrsz:rUC7 _cn Sta7da ' Side yard. -i side yard is five (5) feat . c . Rear yard. Minimum rear yard is eic'^_t (S) feet . d. Side yard on f"za^ki= street of comer lot. Mini<<<um Sid_ yard cn the flanking street of a corner lot is fifteen (15 ) feet . 5 . F-eicht limitaticn. T:� - height limitation is two and cn_-half (2 1/2 ) stories , not exceedinu thi_iy-f_vv_ (35 ) f _ 6 . T.,terior yams . Int=_ _cr Yards shall nct be comcuted as Fart of the s; ta ccveraae . i1 7 . Additional stand=rds. Seechapter 15 . 08 , pertaining to general and supplementary provisions , for requirements concern'_na accessory buildings and additional standards . SECTION 22. subsection (E) of Section 15 . O4 . 030 is hereby amended by adding a new subsection (8 ) as follows : 8 . M_aximum impervious sur==ce- Maximum impervious surface i= ==ventv (70) percent of the total lot area . a . Except for lots used for aaricultural practices . the =ximum impervious surface area allowed shall be ten thousand (10 . 0001 square feet when the _07 is ar e.--.t=r _?'1 one acre b . PcrChes and -=''vat= and Snared courtyard atures may be bu-1` withi-� the fron= building s-`back IJ SECTION 23 . subsection_ '7) of Section 15 . O4 . 030 is hereby amended by adding a ne-.a-s-ahSecticn (9) as follows : C . Zero lot line and cl sterina. Minimum lot width. buildina se--backs , and minimum lot size reaualticns T".aV be mod!f i ed consiste'_1t with provisions fcr zero ict line and clustering housi-c: Ge'y�lCDment . F . cians. The sign reaulazicnS cf chapter 15 . 06 shall aDp lv. L5 G. OffStreet park-44na. The OffStreet parking requirements of chap`er 15 . 05 shell apply. . Deve ocment p 1 a7: review. Zevelocment plan review is required_ when the prccerty to be developed is classified as view properzy• SECTION 24 . Severability. If any section, sentence, clause Or phrase of this Ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstltuticna- '-v a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity cr constitutionality Ol any Other section, sentence, c_aus= or pnrase of this -ordinance . SECTION 25. Effective Date . This ordinance --all take effect and be in force thirzy (30) days from and after it=- passace, aporcval and pudic-ation as provided, by law. fl i ATTEST : F RENDA JACOBER, /1CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM : RO ER A. LL?OVICH, CITY ATT F" PASSED �I day of :TP r vim ~ O 1595 . APPROVED a�O day of �� / o�/L � 1°c5 , PIIELISrED day off-0�� 1og5 . I heresy Certify that this a trLe CO_y O: Ordinance _ No . �� , caSsed bV the C '_ 1 _tv Councl OL the Czy Oi Kent , WaShinCLon, ana aCDrOVed by the M.="v^_ O- t�"?� C1ty O� Kent a5 hereon indices i CITY CLERT{ �7 Pc zC CS F i 7zoL* ORDINANCE NO. s - , per, DOS AN ORDINANCE Of the City Council cf th J City of Kent , Washington, makinc certain G u p�5 7- amendments to Chapter 15 . 04 es the Zoning Code, as recently amended Gy � Ordinance No . gar 3258 , and making other amendments to the ZOnina Code to Clarify rr'=viously estahliShed density standards . G . vo5 W,::-_R_AS, The City of Kent Comprehensive Fian Co_^.ta-ns goals and DG1iCies which sU_GDGrt a vari=ty G_ lOUs1nG tTJe= and GAT Qa0 ,,,/ densities throughout t e City, 1_1C_UC-^:, mC?"c S1nC� G--aS11f✓ than o multifamily r ci tlul d2'TcIO^;T:e�t_ , mc-e a-,-; , a T pp innovation in terms of building- and site desicz and resid ntial setbacks ; and WI-ERELS, the City of Kenn Com_rehensive Flan CCntains J�> `r' 953 goals and policies which recommend expansi c-, Of home cwne=',ip opportunities fen all income groups ; and ,o 50�" WrE Vic, the Ci y of Kezt Cc,<<_re--easive Flan contains �G (✓ Coals and policies which recommend a re'v_Sc^. Calculation s'y"Stem iGr determiri_ng max-mum aliowa''^ e si-gl= family density; and pcl0� D 5, G�• EFS, The City Council er 19 1995 , W:J: On D___.ece7 b adopted Ordinance No . 3268 revising Ken' Zoning Code provisions esidential development standards , for single family r cor_sistent with the above_ coals and policies ; and w=_RE=5, following adoption of Ordinance No . 3268 the Council has dote mined that corrective, non-substantive amendments should be made to the Zoning Code to clarify the reV=sicns made to the code pursuant LG Sa'_d ordinance; NOW, THEREFORE, COUNCIL OF T_E CITY OF K=NT, w?.S TNGTON, DOES T==E CITY HEREBY ORDaTN pS FOLLOWS : S_�CT�_ There is hereby added to Cl-_apter 15 . 02 Gf the Kent City Code, entitled ',DeLini-icns , " a new section, Section 15 . 02 . 096 , to read as f011Gws : Sec . 15 . 02 . 096 . Density, maximum permitted. Maximum permiteed density refers to the maximum number of single family dwelling units permitted Der acre . For fractions Of an acre, a maximum permitted density shall be proportional to the S1Ze GL the lc_ . For example , wnere the maximum permit-ems density is six (6) single family dwelling units per acre, the maximum permitted density On onehalf (1/2) acre is three (3) single family dwelling units , subject to lot size and other �dards of Chapter , = • 04 . development sta._��_ - 2 SECTION 2 . Chapter 15 . C2 cf the Kent City Code entitled "Definitions" is amended by amending Section 15 . 02 . d�87 to read as follows : Sec . 15 . 02 .487 . Single-family district. n single-family zoning district is a zc=nc district w= any cf the following desicr_ations : r_ = SR-2 , T_ — =SR4 5 , _._ 2gR5 GR-8 , single-family residenti_l , ^ _ _ v r-rl c-I tu—al CiCtri Ct . residential agricultural and P_-1 . G_.- ___- SECTION 3 . There is hereby added to Cl-_apter 15 . 02 cf the Kent City Cod , entitled "Defin_itions , " a new section, Section 15 . 02 . 588 , to read as follcws . Sec . 15 . 02 . 568 . Zor_ing districts-redef4ned. Any references in the Kenz City Code to the former z--n-:1 districts R1-5 . 0 , R1-7 . 2 , R1-9 . 5 , R=-12 . 0 , R1-20 . 0 and Rz� shall mean the zoning districts d sicnat_d as fcllcws : C, rren Zone _ orm_ Zone R1-5 . 0 S -8 R1-7 . 2 SR-5 Ri-9 . 6 SR-a . 5 R1-12 . 0 R1-20 . 0 SR-2 RA SR-1 SECTION 4 . section 15 . O4 . 005 of the Kent City Code is hereby amended to read as follows : Sec. 15 . 04 . 005 . Agricultural district, A-1 . The stated goal of the city is to pr-se- prime agricultural land in the Green River Valley as a nonrenewable re-source. The agriculture zone SIlall actively cnCOu'-"agz tP_= concentration cf agricultural uses In areas where lnccmpa- '_____t. with urban uses will be minimal tC aid in the implementation CL 3 those goals . Further, such classification cf prime ag icu=aural land thus recognizes and encourages farming activity as a viaLle sector of the local economy. o Principally per uses A. Principally pe>nitt-d uses . rinc_Da are as follows : 1 , Agricultural uses , including any customary agricultural building Or structure, such as :i planting, cultivation and harvesting Of crODs , animal husbandry, nurscrleS ano greenhouses arc i Other agricultural occupations . sin l family dwelling per lot . 2 . One (1) g__ 3 . Group homes class '- -- B . soeial permit i1SeS. the fcilowinc uses are permitted c provided that they conform to the development standards listed in section 15 . 08 . 020 : Churches . 2 . Nursery SC_'locis and da_✓ Care Centers . C. accessory Uses. Permitted accessory uses are as follows : 1 . GUeSt COttacs not rented or Ot�"lerwi e Se conducted as a business . _ 2 ACCommodazicns for -=rm operators and e'.il_DlcyeeS , _ but not accommodatlo-S for tranSient labor . 3 . Roadside stands not exceeding four hundred (400) sauare feet _n LL and area, ad not over twerl - s; de primarily for the (20) lineal feet cn any side , Sale Of agricultural products On the premises . d . Customary incidental home occupations SL'b] eCt t0 the provisions cf section 15 . 08 . 040 . 5 . Other accessory uses grid buildings CUStOmari1v appurtenant to a permitted use . 6 . For permitted uses, haz'r"G_dous substance land us=s / including Cnsite hazardous waste treatment Or Storage facilities , which are not Subject to _ Cle3nL'D permit reCL'1rc�.entS OL Cr!aDte _11 . C2 a-`-C' do not accumulate more than twenty thousand (20 , 000 ) pounds of hazardous substances or wastes or any comi0ination t:-erecf at any one (1) aim_ on the Site, sub-,ect t'- the provisions Of Section d 15 . 08 . 050 , except offsite hazardous waste treatment Or storage 7-aC111t1eS , Which are peermitt a 1n this distrlCt . 7 . Accessory awellina units . For Durposes pf - - i c-ptipn SeCt1On 15 . O4 . 00= aCC-SSOry QWe ' -_ I; LtS SI1a-- not he included - - Ca_CL_ t---- - maximum density. D. Conditional uses . Conditional L'Ses are as follcwS 1 . General conditional uses as listed in section 15.. 08 . 030 . occ hazardous s"h__ 2 . For permitted uses , access h�zardoL� �� ance land uses which are not subject to cleanL_o permit requiremer-Ls Ot chaff-er 1 I . Q2 and wn ich ac i7_:_I =L= more than twenty thousand (20 , 000) pounds cf azardoj,s sLDstn:7Ces Cr wastes or any cCir,�:_'_aC1Jn thcrcOi a� any cne ( -, time Cn he site, i tO the Drovisicns Of _eCz1Cn 1-5 . 08 . 050 , except offsite hazardous was-e t=-e-tment Cr Storage facilities, which are not permitted 17 t-is dlstrlCt . E . F'ie Vel CDm=n% s�.a Car.^.s. T-'fie Tr.axlmum Dermlt`e= Ce''_Sity :Or the a-1 zcn1nQ Q1SLri is o7e inal- fam11 -,- dwell i nc ur,i t Der acre . 1 . Minimum lot. Minimum_ lot area is thirty-_ =r thousand seventy hLn re'd (=- , 700) square 2 . N171 ]IC lot wif:F . Minimum lot W1Ct_1 1S s1 Ct'y' (�Q) _ tr i a . TO determ t ine lo wi f d--h orregular lots , a circle of awolicabl_ diameter (the minimum lot wi d_: permitted; s�`.all be scaled within the proposed boundaries of the lot , provided t-at an access e Sement to another lot 1S not incline within the circle . 3 . aX_4:i-'= site C0ve-aC?. Ma:C175,UM- S'_te COVeraJe 1S thirty (30) g YL- imumd re�uire�!ents . Y=-~ _ a . FrC—' L.=='u. V:__47L-dm f-c t yard is twenty (20) �cY 5 I i (1) Porches and private shared courtyard features may be built within the front building se_ back line . �) b. Side yard. Minimum side yard is fifteen (1 feet . C . Rear yard. Minimum rear yard is twenty (20) d. S1Qe yard on2 ' '� r=ct Of Corner lot. l=-k-ng S` Minimum side yard On th_ flanking street cf a corner lot is twenty (20) feet . . rj :i�igPt lim-tatiOl2. The height limitation is two and one-ha_. (2 1/2) stories , not exceeding l = thirty-five (35) feet . The neiaht 11m1tatlGP_S Shall not apply to barns and silos provided tna� thev are not located within fifty (50) feet Of any lot line . 6 . Addi tio.1=1 standards. a. Struc-jres for _=eding, he S-ing and care of animals , except 'rcusehc ld pets , Shall be set back fifty (50 ) _eet from any property line . b . see c^_apter 15 . 03 , pertaining to general and SlipplemcntarY =3visiOnS , for re uiremen--s c3nc=r-!-ng aCce—Escry bi ildirgs and aCC-LiO":31 Standards . C . Tile following uses are prohibited: (i) The removal of topsoil for any purpose . _ (2) C-rade and fill operations , provided that 1i:nited Grad_ and fill may be approved as needed---- construct buildings or structures as outlined in subsections 15 . 04 . 005 A. B . , C . and D . (3) All sulDsuirf-ace activities , including excavation -cr underground utilities , pipelines Gr other underground i-sta_lat1OnS , that cause Permanent d_SrtlptlOn Of the Surface O- the land. Temporarily disru ted soil surfaces S:�all be r_stored in a manner consis`_nt with agricu t ral uses . 6 i (a ) Dumping or storage cf nonacrricult•aral solid or liquid waste , or of trash, rubbish or noxious materials . (5) Activities that violate sound agricultural soil and water conservaticn management practices . 7 . Maximum impervious sur�ace coverage. Maximum impervious surface coverage is forty (a0) perce__= of the total parcel area . a. Except Lcr lots used LOr agricultural practices, the maximum impervious sur=ace area allowed shall be ten thousand (10 , 000) S r� feet he l greater ha-n One glla_._ L_"_ W.__n the lot iS Great__ t__ (1) acre . 8 Z_r0 Ipt line aId c L'Ster2^C. Minimum let Width, building setbacks, and minimum lot size regulations may be modified consistent with provisions for Zero Ict line and cluszeri_'ig housing development . F . Ci c The Sign reg11_atiOnS of chapter 15 . 06 shall apply. G. OilStL-SQL Tarki_!a. The cf-stree. parking reglli":emenzS O1 CnG�I_=r 5 05 shall GD:/=v. SECTTON S. Section 15 . 05 . 010 of the Kent City Code is hereby amended to read as follows : Sec . 15 . 04 . 010 . Residential agricultural district, P::�;SR-1 . The City has, through its ^�-SK-1 and MA zones , the key to assuring efficient and attractive growth. !t is essential that the city avoid excessive ZOP_ing far in ad-vance Of demand. e7 i and M� 1GndS to more i--ensive use shall be iC_ OP__ng OL SR-1 i predi dated u-con th' _ documentation Of the need for addit-J oral ar ; l r n lad i city. S resi d_-_ti al commercial o_ i__d str al _, the c_t COCLmeAtatlOn Shall CORS1St OL a i1SCa1 -. ,-acz analysis Snowing that the other la-ids already zone^ and accessible to municipal S2rV1CeS are P_Ot SllfLlClplt OY Sll_table to accommodate demand for the proposed uses and that the marlKe_t demand for the proposed 7 i i1 development is sufficient to Generate tn-''- revenues necessary tc Drovide municipal Services , including bllL ncz limited to pCl1C=, fire, streets , water, drainage and sewer, required by the : project . i A. Pri-r2cipally Pe'-mitted Uses . Pr'_nciza11V permitted uses are as follows : 1 . Agricultural uses , including any customary such as agricultural building or structure, planting, CLlltivatlon and harVe-sting of Crops , animal husbandry, nurseries and Greenhouses and other agricultural occupations . 2 . One (1) single-family dwelling per lot . 3 . Group homes class I-A. $ . ,SD2C1. 1 7�2ri<S t uses . The f C.l 1 CW?P_g uses are provided that they cor_form to the development standaras listed in section 15 . 08 . 02'� : 1 . Churches . 2 . Nursery schools and day care centers . ,S Permitted CessOry uses are as C. Accessory uses . .� -Follows: 1 . GlleSt COttag=S nC�. renteC Cr OtnerWlSe conducted as a business . 2 . ACCOmmOdatlCP_s fOT ia'-"m or tors andcmDlOV=es , but not accommcdatlons for transient labor. Off) 3 . Roadside stand not e:cceeding four hundred (a scuare feet in floor area, and not over twenty for t_^_'� (20) lineal feet cn any Side, primarily sale Of agricultural prcductS grown Ori the premises . g . Customary incidental :^_ome occupations subject o the provisions of section 15 . 08 . 040 . 5 . Other accessory uses and buildings customarily accurtenant to a permitted use, except for on- hazardous waste area-men- and StOraCe faCll=tleSi wn1Ch are ncc permit�ed in residential ZOP_es . P_CCeSSCry aWelllnc, L'_niis . For DIIrDOses Of this 6 . SeCtion . CeC7 i Oil l 5 . of . of acceSSOrV dwell inq Cl Icea in calculating the units shall not be i ^__ maximum permitted density . 8 D. Conditional uses. Conditional uses are as follows : general conditional uses as listed in section 15 . 08 . 030 . F . Development standards. The maximum re=4 tr-d ( censi ty for the SR-1 zoning dis7ri Ct is -one single -^ nilV dwelling LIP_1t Der aCr- �i 1 . Minimum lot. Mi_r_imiLm lot 'area 1s thirty-'OUT thousand seven hundred (34 , 700) square feet . 2 . M_r_irnum lot width. Min=mum lot width is sixty (60) feet . a . TOu lot Width for irregL'la_ lots , a Circle of applicable diameter (t:^_e minimum lot width permitted) Shall be scaled within the proocsed boundaries c_ t=-= lot , provided that c access easement to not-_er lot is net 1nC_i;Cc._. W_t -! the CirCj 3 . M ximum site coverer_=. Maximum site coverage is thirty (30) percent . 4 . Mi^_mum yard re c a . Frcr:t y"ard. Min_ um front yard IS twenty (2 0) feet . (1) Porches a_ Dr_vate and S _-e^_. Courtyard LeatureS maV be built Within tIl __0-it building se--back line . b . Side yerc. N'_ m -. _ _ ,rard is f _zieen (15) feet. . C . Fear yard. Miri..r:zi rear yard is twenty (20 ) feet . a. Side yaran cn =1^��;^g street o= ccr r _lot. Minimum side yar cn the flanking street cf a corner lot is twee-ty (20) feet . 5 . F_eight Iimitat_on_. The height limitation is two and one-half (2 1/2) st=ri=s , not 2XCE=ding thirty-f- (35) E . Aiditioi2al S CcrC: . a . Structures =r _ *?g, hou's1P_C_ and Cara of animals, exce�= cusehcld pets , s_all b set back fifty (30) f__- from any property line . c .i b See Chapter 15 . C)5 , Dertain_ng t0 general and suD_ DlementarV provisions, for re",uiremena5 concerning accessory buildings and addiit onal standards . 7 . Maximum impervious surface coverage. Maximum impervious surface coverage is forty (40) percent of the total parcel Grp_ . a . Except for lots used for aCrlcultural Ii practices, the maximum impervious surface area allowed shall be ten thousand (10 , 000) saucer feet when t•^e lot is greater than one (1) acre . 8 . Zero lot line and dust_ring. Minimum lot width building setbacks , and minimum lot size regulations may be modified consistent with prpvisicns for zero lnt line and CluStcrinQ housing development . F . c1cs. The sign regul at-Oo7 Of CnaDter 1 5 . 0� c.^:al 1 apply. G. Of=stree par.�rng- The offstreet parking requirements c chapte 15 . 05 shall app' f r F De:relopmeTt plan revieN. D_velopment plan review is re al],ired when the prODertV tG be developed 1s classified as view prODerty. SECmrpN 6. Section 15 . 04 . 020 of the Kent City Code is hereby amended to read as follows :_ Sec . 15 . 04 . 020 . Single-family residential districts . It is the purpose of the single-family residential districts preserve low density, single-family residential to stabilize and - neia_hborhoods . It is further the purpose to provide a rance of minimum lot sizes in Order to prOmcte C1ve—i tV and rec:-='117e G variety cf residential environments . "-.�maif l_Rlum DerT� tt?`-j A. Districts establis12 by -= - density. The following single-family residential districts are established: 10 I SR-2 - - -� --= let --__ . Two ( ) sin 2 --•�l =-- farm lv dwell , ng units per acre . 2 . _2 R-3 �l • i .. _ -_--- ---....�... _Three (3 ) ai nCl = f=milVVdWeI l i nC u_'.its Der ac"-- - - -- 3 . .•.----..._... ___ "our and cne },al f (d 5) siricr e family dwell ; na units Der acre . 1. _ -__ -_x (G) �- ngle f-i�---nil V dwelling units Der =,-e . sj ^al=_ -F=mi lv dwc ' l inC, units per acre . Mi-nimum zoning Brea. Mini.<<�m zoning area for the — district is flftc== thousand (15 , Qo0 ) so_ -dare feet (three (3 ) lots) . ` C. Maximum zoning area . Maximum zoning area for the -- t_ ct is eight a_r-_ D . =rincir�ally permitted usa . Fr' nc_;.ally per-aitted uses are as LOlIOwS : - 1 . One (1) single-family dwelling per lot . 2 . Crop and tree farminc. 3 . Group homes class I- E . SD=C?31 �J2Y'ililt uses. The fCllowi= uses are DerTiltt=d provided they conform to the development standards listed in section 15 . OS . C2 1 . Churches . 2 . Nursery schools and da.r care centers . F. Accessory users. Permitted accesscrrt uses are as follows : 1 . Accessory uses and buildinc_s cus- tomarily a^Durtcna:"_t t0 a perm. use, such as Garages , carports and m_nor structures for personal property. ` 2 . Rooming and boarding of not more than three (3 ) persons . ll i i 1 1 3 . Customary incidental home occupations subject to the provisions of section 15 . 08 . 040 . • I a_ . Accessory dwelling units . For ouroose of this cceS all i r._ section Section 15 . 04 . 020 . a�._.___ory dw____-... '.I Units Shall not be included in calculating the �ii maXimllm Dermitted dersjjy G. COnC11t1OP_al U52S. Conditional L'S2S are a5 follows : i General cor_ditional uses as listed in c2ct ' on 15 . 08 . 030 . H. Development standards . 1 rrin_mum lot. Minimum lot area is as follows : a r, -^SR 2 Sixteen thousand (16 , 000) scare feet . 2SR-3 : Ninety-six hundred (9 , 600) square feet . r- a _ hundred (7 , 600) square feet . d, _SR-e Fifty-seven hun_dr=_d (5 , 700) sa-aare fee.. . e - _ • ^SR-8 : Four thousand (a , 000) square feet . 2 . Nin�mum lot wilt M____mum lot width is as follows : ^SR-2 FifZ!, (50) feet . Fifty (50 ) feet . c 'cR-a Fifty (50) feet . d r= _ 2—^ R-G • JFifty (50) feet . e . i==. 3R-8 : Forty (40) feet . TO determine r'inimum lot Width for irregular - . lots, a circle of applicable diameter (the minimum lot wiitn permitted) shall be scaled within the prcpesed boundaries of the lot , provided that an access Easement to another jot is not included within the circle . 3 . -xj_muln site coTre_j . maximum Site coverage is as follows : . SR-2 : VIirty (30 ) percent . Forty-five (45) percent . C . F7 . �S3-4 . 5 : Forty-five (45) percent . 12 d. ..- . . .SR-6 : riffy (50 ) perce_nt . e (55 ) percent . 4 . MvJ nimum yard a . Front yard. Minimum front yard is ten (10) feet . I (1) At least twenty (20) linear feet of driveway shall be provided between any garage, carport or other primary parking area and the street property line with the exception of an alley property line . (2) Porches and Dr'_vate and snared courtyard features may be built within the front building setback line . (3) Proposed front yards less than twenty (20) _ in d . zh are to a 7c-oval by the 11anning director, based on review and recommendation from t-_e L`ub11C WOr.-_= Cep-artment relatiV2 L oL_^_= exi sting a-.d future c-a=fi c volumes and right-C -w— ieauireme-_t= as speOi-led in the C__ ✓ ComLiDrehen=i v e trGnsoOrL.."- L i On l an and C1ty construction sta_d_= -dS . b . Side yard. Min—J -L--m side yard is five (5) feet . C . Rear yard. Mi-_imum _ear yard is eight (3 ) feet . d. Side yard on �f1a-king street c corner ?et . Minimum side yard on the flanking street of a corner lot is rift e-n (15) feet . 5 . le4cTi2t Limitatio n.. --_--- t limitatJcns are a= follows : a. r- OSR-2 : Two and one-half (2 1/2) stories , not exceeding the rty-five (35) feet . b . _"SR-3 TWO and one-half (2 1/2) stories , not exceeding thirt' -five_ (35) feet . C . - _ - R-a . 5 : Two a-_d one-:-alf (2 1/2) stories , not exceeding thirty-five (35 ) feet . d. --- . . ^SR-5 : Two and one-half (2 1/2) stories , not exce d-' ria thir v-five ( 35 ) feet . 13 e . =7=SR-8 : Two ant one-half (2 1/2) stories , not exceeding t'nirzy (30) feet . 6 . Interior yards. Interior yards shall not be computed as part?7 of the site coveraae . 7 . Addil icnal Jrtan(aards. See chapter 15 • 08 , :i pertaining to general and SllDDIeme_T?ta=y provisions, for reQulr mentS concernlnq accesso''-'-y buildings and additional standards ; provided that solar access Sethack requiremer_tS Of sections 15 . 08 . 230 through 15 . 08 . 23^ shall not apply to the R1-5 . 0 zone . g Maximum impervious Surface coverage. Maximum impervious surface overages are as follows : a. - "OSR-2 : Fort_ (a0) percent . b. r===SR-3 =i=ty (50) percent . C . R^- OS -a - Six y (EO) percent . d. ==SR-5 : Seven (70) percent . e . ^cam-8 : SevenLV-five (75) percent . Except for lots used for agric ltu'ral practices , the maximum lmpervicuS sLi—=Ce area allowed s`:ell he ten thousa_-_d (10 , 000 ) square feet . 9 . Zero IOt I1P_2 'aIlCj CluSte'_" '-IIg. Min mum lot w1d- h, building setbacks , and minimum lot Size be moo_Lled consistent w'_zh regulations may - provisions for zero _ot 11_^_'e and clustering housing development . I . Signs. The sign regulations cf chapter 15 . 0E shall apply. J. �LiStr?e= park-inn'. Tr_e cffStreet parking reau'1at10P.S Cf chapter 15 . 05 shall apply. K. Development plan review. Development plan review is required when the property to be developed is classified as view property. S."CTION 7. Section 15 . 04 . 030 of the Kent City Code is hereby amended to read as follows : Sec . 15 . 04 . 030 . Duplex multifamily residential district, MR-D . 14 I 1 It is the purpose of the MR-D district to provide for a limited increase in population density and allow for a treater variety of housing types by allowing duplex dwelling units . A. Principally Permitted uses. Principally permitted uses are as follows : 1 . One (1) sinale-family dwelling per lot . 2 . One (1) duplex per lot . 3 . Group homes class I-A and I-E . - Crop and tree farmi B . Special permit uses. The fell Ow=ng uses are Derr i --ed provided that they cor_fo-= to the development standards listed in section 15 . 08 . 020 : 1 . Churches . 2 . Nursery schools and day care centers . C. ACCeSSCry uses. Perm=_ __ accessory uses are as follows : 1 . Lccessor-y uses and buildings cu's omaril y aDpurteaant to a D='_'i teed use, such as Garages, carports and minor str'Lic ur_S for szo=== Of Personal Drozerty. J 2 . Rooming and bcGrdi-_c cf not more than three (3 ) persons . 3 . Customary inC1a___ al : Gme OCCL' ati0 S subject to the provisions of se^tioP_ 15 . 08 . 0�0 . a . Accessory dwelling u-nit-S . For DurDOs O` t is ceCtlOn . Se?r Jon 1= . Ca . 030 , motet=cry dw=l 1 n.- uni is s-lall not b= i nC Ld=d J n C=l rLl �.t i '1C tIn= maximum Permitted deep s' ty D . Conditional uses. Conditional uses are as follows : 1 . General conditional uses listed in section 15 . 08 . 00 . 2 . Group homes class -C, =I-a , II-- and TT-C. E . Development standards. 707 cinCle family dwellin^c the maximum De'_'mi tte'.1' de^S' `y and d=v=l nDment c`"nd-r„_ of Section 15 . 04 . 020 to c4-e zcninc shall aDDly. 1 . Yinimum lot. Min_Tum lot area is as follows : a . Single-family dwellings : Fifty-seven hundred (5 , 700) square feet 1� i b . Duplex (two-family dwelling unit) : Eight thousand five hundred (a , 500) square_ feet . 2 . Mir_imum lot width. Minimum lot width is as follows : le- E- (50) a . Sing_ family dwellinG: Fif�y - (1) To det=_rm'ne m'n-mum loc width for irregular lots , a C1rCle OL applicable i diameter (t.ie m-nj mu'm lot width- permitted) shall be scaled within the ti prODOsed bcu'ndarleS OL t11e lot , provided that an access eaSemen- tO another loz 1S P_OL 1 1CluQed w_tt-1n the C1YCle b. DuDleX: E_'I _hty (80) _eer . 3 Maximum Site coverages. Max mum Site coverage 1S as— follows : a • c1'_1Glc-fam_ly dwelling : Y1LLv (50) DerCer•_C . b . DuDleX: Fcrty (40) percent . 4 . Minim.-Tn ya-d eoz ; ements. a. Fro yard. Minimum front yard is ten (10) (1} y P_L 1=aSt twc^.ty (20) OL Cr_VcWGV cam:^_^� l uC Dr'�v1Qe� 'e7ween any Garage, ' CaYDGrt or other DrlmarY pGYtC1?1Q area and the street property line with the eXCeDt1OP_ Of an alley property line . Porches and private and Shared ccu, -y'a Porches features may be built within the fror_r building satback line . (3 ) PrOposed front yards less than twentv (20) L _et in depth are subject to approval by the planning director, based on review and recommendation from the public worms department relative to the- existing and future traffic volumes and r'_ght-OL-way recdi cements as speC'_:1e^- :z the city comprehensive transportation plan and city construction standards . b. Side yard. Minimum side yard is five (5) feer , 15 !1 c . Rear yard• ?"?i -mum rear yard is eiz ht ( E ) feet . d. ,C'QS yarQ' 012 LlankinG S`.reet Of Corne --t• r t. Minimum side yard on the flanking sc-e c-L a j Corner lot i S fifteen (15) feet . . •.�, -,�_yht l i :SlltatlOP_ 1S t-wc if (2 1/2) Stcr'eS , not exceed'ng and one-half thirty-five (35) fee= - • G . Tnter4.or yards. lnterJcr yards snall not !De COIIlDLL=_d as part Of the site coverage . 5 . 08 `] . 11C1c_l1t].Cn.-1 St=nCQa2"QS. �_= CnaDLcr 1 , perzai ni ng LO a`-nera and suDDlementary provisio__c , for _eq it meats concern_na accessory bu! IGings and ad-C:1Llcnal sz-a-aards . e=age. Maximum �'ax_m�-n 1m�ervlcus '._ 1mDerv1011S Surface is SeVentV (70) perce-_t O'- t-z=L lot ar-a . a. except for lots used for agr-cultural prac�-r�� ne m X'mum _i.De'_"V1Ous s1:r-— area allow sn�-1 be �_ t �a n (10 , 000than one sauce-_ f= whe-- t' e Ot (1) acre_ . b . L-rcnes and N'r_ J.^aze and snared C.our'.-Yard features may he Du1lt within the frO'_t building se:!h c.0 l" . 9 . z_=ro lot line and clust_r_ng. Minimum lot width, building- setbackS , and mir_i=71 lot size realllat1Ons may De mcdifiei Consistent w'1th provisions for zero lot line and clustering housina develc=en-_. F . Signs. The sign regu-aticns of C-naoter 15 . Oo shall apply. G. ofistr==t parking-. The oLfstreec parking- requ_remen-s cf c.aot2r 15 . 05 s:~:a--1 a_fly. Develor-ment Flan rc'✓�=T.J. r'evelCpm`. plan rs'v_sW 1S reaulr-' when the prOD=rtV t0 D2 deveiOoea 1S c1GsS1 ied as view DrcD=r_y . I � SECTION B. Section 15 . 04 . 040 , of the Kent City Code is hereby amended to read as follows : Sec . 15 . 04 . 040 . Garden density multifamily residential district. bO-G. It 15 the Purpose of the NL?-G G'_strlcz to provide lOCat'_OnS ifor garden apartment densities suitable for suburh,,an living. A. Principally perili tted uses. Pri nci Dal ly permitted uses are as follows : 1 . Single-family dwellings and two-family dwellings Or duplexes - 2 . Mult_jple-family dwellings , including apartments and townhouses . 3 . Group homes class I and '-3 . a Crop or tree farming. g Special per it uses. --he iollowinc uses are permitted provided that t m t =_ hey conforo the aevlopment stanaarc- listed in section 15 . 08 . 020 : 1 . Churches . 2 . Nursery school and day care centers . C. Accessory uses. permitted accessory uses are as follows : 1 . Accessory uses and b'aildings customarily appurtenant to a perm-fitted use, such. as garages , tructures for storage of carports and minor s personal property. 2 . Rooming and boarding of not more than three (3 ) persons . - 3 customary incidental nome occupations sulbj ect to the provisions of section 15 . 03 . 040 . 4 . Offices incidental and necessary to the conduct cf a principally permitted use . 5 . Accessory dwelling units . For purposes Of t7'_is section . Se=J On l ; C'4 OaO • accesSorV dwelling units shall-l not be i nc sided 1n Cal c"' ating t_^_- maximum Dermitt-d density. D . Cond4t4onal uses . Cond'_ticn al uses are as follows : 1 . General ccndititnal uses as listed in section 15 . 08 . 030 . 2 . GrouD homes class I-C, II-m, II-3 and II-C. E . Devel oomen t standards. 1 . Single-family dwellings and duplexes. For single- family family dwellings e___E � _ ___._c, the maximum Dermitted density and develonme_nt standards of J section 15 . 04 . 020 relating to SR-8 zoning districts shall acDiv and for duDlex=_s . the .� max=mum Dermitted density and development standards of section 15 . 04 . 030 shall apply. 2 . Multifamily dwelling units. The following shall apply to multifamily dwelling units : a . Minimum lot. Minimum lot area is eigLt thousand five hundred (3 , 500) square feat �cr the first two (2) dwel l ir_g units, a:_c two thousand five hundred (2 , 500) square foet for each additional dwelling unit . h . Minimum lot wider. Minimum lot width is eighty (80) feet . c . Density. Maximum density is sixteen (_5) dwelling units per acre . a. Maximum site coverage. Maximum site coverage is forty-five (45 ) per nt . e . Minimum yard reo-uirements . (1) F'ronc yard. Minimum front .yard iS twenty (20) feet . (2) Side yard. Each side_ yard shall he a minimum often (10) percent of the ice width; however, regardless cf lot width, the yard width need not he more than thirty (30) feet . (3) Rear yard. Minimum rear yard is two_-,, (20) feet . (a) Side yard en flanking street of corn_- lot. Minimum side yard on the flanking street of a corner lot is fifteen (15 ) feet . f . Dist=noes between buildings . io I (l ) PSl Inner Court providing aCCeS� LO a shall l be a minimum double-row building .ia_1 of twenty (20) feet . ii (2) The distance between principal build_ngs shall be at least one-half the sum c= { the height cf both buildings ; provided, however, that in no case shall the distance be less than twelve (12) This reauirement shall also apply to portions of the Same building separated from each Other by a cOL'rt Or other op space . h l andscap_:"_C reCL'iremeIltS O_ g. Landscaping. The _ - Chaoter 15 . 07 s%all apply. t!. Yeigr1 11_T.1t.. t1C_ The he'_Cht lin"litation 1S (a three (3) stories , not exceed-ng forty 0 ) feet . i . P_dditional standar s. See chapter 15 . 08 , pertaining to aeneral and Suppleme._tary provisions , for recuirements concerning accessory build_^_CS and add ticnal standards . Mult�c:�m_ly Lra_tc_t10n areas. The reauirements of s_cticn 1- . 08 . 215 Shall apply in -any mull-!family transit-iOrn area, which ; nCludes any portion cf a multifamily ^,d feet OL = district WitL!1P_ Ci'_= hundred (10O) ^ slncle--am-1v o'_S7rict Or within one hundred (100) feet of a o bl ; C Street right-of-w=Y. k. Multifamily de=i,= review. The requirements of section 15 . 0G . 047 shall apply to any multifamily dwelling Of three (3 ) or more units . shall F . Sicrns. The sign regulations of chapter 15 . 06 s� a apply. G. Orrstreet parking. 1 The OS-Street parki^_C regu-rements ofL chLapter 15 . 05 shall apply. 2 . offstreet park=ng may be located in required yards except for the front ten (lO) Feet abutting anv 20 i public right-of-way, which must be landscaped. No crrstreet oarking is permitted in the recuired open green area. Development plan review. Development plan review , s required as provided in section 15 . 09 . 0-0 . SECTION 9 . Section 15 . 04 . 050 of the Kent City Code is , her=_b'v amended to read as follows : Sec . 15 . 04 . 050 . Medium density multifamily residential district, MR-M. Tt is the purpose of the MR-M district to provide for . iota=ions for medium density residential districts suitable for urban-suburban living. A. Principal Y P - =a yes . pY; ; l =r�;i tt_ ; u_ c-pally permitted uses are as ollows : 1 . Si ncrle- ami ly dw el !i--.-5 ana two-farmlV dwel l in(7s or duplexes . 2 . Multiple-family dwellings . 3 . Grou_o homes class =-T_, I-B and _-C. 4 . Crco and tree farT,_nc_ . 3 . SoeCzal pe_ -i—L uses . The fallowing uses are per -1---ed provided that they conform to the development sta:'_dards listed in section 15 . 08 . 020 : 1 . Churches . 2 . Nursery schools and day care centers . C. P_CCeSSOry uses. Permitted. accessory uses are as follows : 1 . Accessory uses and build _gs customarily acuurtenant to a per:;. Lte'.1• use, such: as garages , carports or minor structures for storage of personal property. 2 . Rooming and board-nC C- not more than three (3 ) persons . 3 . CL'Stomary incidental =-Ome cccuzatlons subject to the .provisions cf sec_ion 15 . 08 . 040 . 4 . Offices incidental and r__cessary to the conduct of a permitted use . D . Conditicnal uses. Cor_diticnal uses are as follows : 21 1 . General conditional uses as listed in section 15 . 08 . 030 . 2 . Croup homes class II-A, II-B and _--C. E. Development standards. sincle- 1 . Single-family dwellings and dupl_x_y s . For the maximum family dwellincs �___ _u___==_=, - permitted density and development stanaards of section 15 . O4 . 020 relating to SR-e zoning '•i districts shall aonly and for duDlex-s , the Ti7aximum rermitted density and d.evelccment standards of section 15 . Oa . 030 shall apply. 2 . Multifamily dwelling units. The followina shall amply to multifamily dwelling units : a. Nrinimum lot. Minimu-n lot area is eight thousand five hundred (8 , 500) square _cY_ - the first two (2 ) dwelling units , and One thousand six hur:drea s=are feet for (1 , 500) each additional dwelling unit . b. Minimum lot widt�. Mir_imum lot width is eiahty (80) feet . (23 ) C . Density Maximum density is twenty-t_ _�� dwelling ur_its per acre • d. Maximum site coverage. Maximum site coverage is forty-five (--5) percent . e . Minimum yard requirements. (1) Front yard. Minimum front yard is twenty (20) feet . (2) Side yard. Each side yard shall be a minimum of ten (lo) percent of the lot width; however, regardless of lot width, the yard width need not be more than thirty (30) feet . (3) Rear yard. Minimum rear yard is twenty (20) feet . (4) Side yard Cn flanking street Of- cc=, er lot. Minimum side yard on the flanking street of a corner lot is fifteen (15) feet . f . Distances between buildings. 22 (1) LET'] inner court providing access to a double-row building shall be a minimum of twenty (20) feet . (2) The distance between principal blliidingS shall be at least one-half the sum of the height cf both buildings ; provided, shall the however, that in no case ha_ ' distance be lass than twelve (12) This requirement shall also apply to portions of the same building separated from each other by a court or other open space . a. Landscapinc. The landscaping req-ti- remen_s cz chapter 15 . 07 shall apply. h. l_i71_-.=.-4=. The he_ghz_ limitation i S three (3 ) st--rieS , not exceeding forty (40) ; _ Additicral s a�d�rCs. See chapter 15 . 08 , P�-- a�r i ni ng to General and supplementary _crovisionsy cons=rnirg a CCr-Es=y bui ld_ngJ Gnu addition_l S�:Gndard.S • j . Mu7�ifaTi7y tra.s tiCn areas . The rem i remer_ts CL Section 15 . 08 . 215 Shall apply in any multifamily t_ansition area, which includes any Notion Of a multifamily district within One hundred (100) feet Of a sinale-family c_=_tr= Or within one hundred (100) feet of a public street right-of-way. k. Multifamily des_= --view. The re uirements Of section 15 - 09 . 047 shall apply to any multifamily dwe llinc Of three (3 ) or mcre units . F . Sigr.= . The sign regulation-= of chapter 1 5 . Oo' steal apply. G . Offstreet parking. 1 . The offstreet parking requirements OL Chapter 15 . 05 shall apply. 2 . offstreet parking may he located in required yards , exc=pt for tr_e =rent ten (10 ) Leet abutting li j any public right-ef-way, which must be landsa=p_d . I No offstreet parking is permitted in the re; ilre� open green area . H. DevelgpMert plan review. Develocment plan review is required as provided in section 15 . 09 . 010 . i SECTION 10 . Section 15 . 0a . 060 of the Kent City Code is hereby amended to read as follows : .iSec . 15 . 04 . 060 . High density multifamily residential district, MR-H. It is the purpose of the N.R.-3 district to provide =or lOCat10Z=S for hiah density r=SJle':t_al districts s11ta71e for urban living. __ A. _jnc4pally pe=i2 -�=C uses . Principally permi_�_d uS_� are as follows : i . Sinale-family dwellings and two-family dwellings or duplexes . 2 . Multiple-family dwellings . 3 . Group homes class I-A, I-B and I-C. 4 . Crap and tree -arming =-�-mi t uses . T1,e following uses are perCRi tt=a P - )rovlded that they CC^__aril to the development standaras listed in section 15 . 08 . 020 . (No uses presently - C ACC`ScprY 7_:gas_ Permitted accesscry uses ar= as follows : 1 . Accessory uses and buildings customarily appurtenant to a permitted use, such as aaraaeS , carports or m=nor structures for storage of personal property. 2 . rooming and boarding of not more than three (3 ) persons . 3 . CuStOIDary i nCir=*i-ai home occ=ati ons su.0 to the provisions of section 15 . 08 . 040 . d . c'fices 1ncide_ngal and necessary to the ccnducz of a permitted use . 24 S . Accessory dwelling units . For Purposes of t-is section . Section 15 . 04 . 060 . accessory dwelling I 1-,nits shall not be included in calculatl'la_ the maximum Permuted density . i D. Conditional uses. Conditional uses are as follows : 1 . G condltic_lal uses as listed in section 15 . 08 . 030 . 2 . Group homes class II-A, ii-E and II-C. E . Develcoment standards. 1 . Single-family dwellir_cs and duplexes. For single- family dwellings the maximum Permrtt=d density and development standards c: section 15 . 04 . 020 = ,fine to SF-8 zor__^g di strl cts shall apply and fordup l eX_es . t__e _ }'1e _ maximum per fitted de^_situ 'nd de'velOvT'.e'!`. standards of sect=cn 7-5 . 04 . C30 shall apply. 2 . Multifam ly awelli^a units. The following shall apply to multifamily dwelling =it_- : a . Minimum lct . ?`Nip'-mum lot area is eight t_nou'sand five hundred (8 , 500) scruare feet for the first two (2 ) dwellinc_ units, and nine hundred (900 ) square feet for each additional dwelling unit . b. Mir-mum lot widt'n . Minimum lot width is eighty (80) feet . C . Density. Maximum density is forty (40 ) dwelling units per acre . d. Maximum site cov raae. Maximum site ccveraae is fifty (50) Percent . e . Minimum yard requirements _ (1) Front yard. Minimum front yard is twenty (20) feet . (2) Side yard. Each side yard shall be a minimum of ten ( 10) -zercent of the lot width; however, regardless cf lot width, t- yard width need nct be more than thirty (3 0) feet . (3 ) Rear Mini mum rear yard is twenty (20) icer 2 (a) side yard on flanking street of corner lot. Minimum side yard on the flanking street of a corner lot is fifteen (15) feet . f . Distances between buildings . (� ) Pn inner court providing access to a double-row building shall be a minimum i of twenty (20) feet . (2) The distance between principal buildings shall be at least one-half the sum Of the height of both buildings ; provided, however, that in no case shall the distance be less than twelve (12) feet . This requirement shall also apply to portions of the same building separated from each Other by a court Or Other Open space . g. Landscaping. The landscaping _es-uirements Of chapter 15 . 07 shall apply. h Heig2t All tation. The height limitation 1S four (4) stories , not exceeding fifty (50) feet . i . Additional standards. See chapter 15 . 08 , pertaining to general and supplementary provisions, for requirements concerning - accessory buildings and additional standards . � . Multifamily trar_sition areas . The requirements of section 15 . 08 . 215 shall apply In any multifamily transition area, which includes any portion Of a multifamily district within one hundred (100) feet Of a single-family district of within one hundred (100) feet of a public street right-of-Way. k . Multifamily design review. The requirements of section 15 . 09 . O47 shall apply to any multifamily dwelling of three (3 ) or more units . F . signs . The sign r=_culaticr_s of chapter 15 . 06 shall apply. 25 I i G. Ofistre=t parking. 1 . The offstreet parking requirements of chapter 15 . 05 shall apply. ' 2 . Offstreet parking may be located in required yards, eXceDt for the front ten (10) feet abutt=r_c i any public right-of-way, which must be landscaped . No offstre=_t parking is permitted in the rec-ui=ed cpen green area . i -H. Development plan review. Development P i Plan review s required as provided in section 15 . 09 . 010 . • SECT1ON I! Zonlra van Single Famllv Des-cfnatlo^_s amended. The Citv of Kent official zoning map is hereby amended by redesi=ating the zoning districts consistent with the redesignaticn of zoning districts as set forth in this Ordinance : as follows : Former Zone Cur--nt Zone R1-5 . 0 SR-8 R1-7 . 2_ SR-5 Rl-9 . o S -a . 5 R1-12 . 0 SR-3 R1-20_. 0 SR-2 SBCT_ON 12. Severabilirv. if any one or more sections , sub-sections, or sentences of this ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect : the validity of the remaining porticn of this Ordinance and the same shall remain In Lull force and e=ect . 27 S'ECTTON 13 . E-F-Fect i y- Date . This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force five (5) days from and after its passage , aDDroval and publication as provided by law. II i jI rITR, MAYOR ATTEST : BREN-,DA JACO.ER/CI Y CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: ROGER A. LLr OVI CITY ATTORNEY PASSED L�11 day of 1996 . �� 1996 P_PPRO'vED day o: PUSLISrEID day oL J 23 I i hereby certify t-hat tP__S is a true coDv ofL Crdi- nanCe j No . ,, , =assed by the City Cou--Icil of the City of Ken--, i Washington, and a.proved by the Mayor of the City of Kent as hereon indicated. E 2 � G Land Use and Planning Board Minutes October 28, 1996 Heath Harris asked for further clarification of lot coverage and questioned whether there would be a fixed ratio used to determine the allowable mix of residential to commerical. Dick Coltran questioned the abililty to subdivide the different uses for future sale. Jack Olson, 26220 108th Avenue SE, Kent, WA 98031. Mr. Olson is concerned with whether he will have the ability to develop his property. He feels mixed use could allow him better flexibilty and an opportunity to build marketably. Board member Tom Brotherton MOVED and Board member Jerry Daman SECONDED a motion to close the public hearing. Motion carried. Mr. O'Neill addressed Mr. Keppler's question regarding lot coverage. He explained that the proposed amendment would reduce lot coverage to 25% from 40% for stand alone commercial. He also stated that setbacks would be less restrictive. Mr. O'Neill explained that the Binding Site Plan process segmentation that divides condiminiums for individual sale and suggested a similar process when subdividing for future sale. Mr. O'Neill explained that the office zone would allow some retail use and the retail use is expandable with a conditional use permit. Board member Tom Brotherton MOVED to continue the deliberations to the November 25, 1996 Planning Board meeting at 7:00 p.m. The motion was SECONDED by Board member David Malik. Motion carried. #ZCA 96 6 SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS (F. Satterstrom) Planning Manager Fred Satterstrom explained that the single family development standards had been recently amended by Ordinances 3268 and 3290. Mr. Satterstrom explained that it was staff s intention to reduce the standards and promote in-fill development. The single family zoning districts were renamed establishing maximum permitted density. A problem was brought to the attention of the Planning Department when an applicant tried to subdivide and couldn't. Staff is recommending to calculate the maximum permitted density without rounding. Mr. Satterstrom described the individual changes as referenced in the staff report. He also clarified that the reason no change was recommended for the SR-1 zone was that this zone was not effected. Chair Steve Dowell asked the Board if there were any questions for Mr. Satterstrom. Board member Ron Harmon MOVED and Board member Tom Brotherton SECONDED a motion to open the public hearing. Motion carried. 6 4ZCA-96-5 Mixed Use Zoning 4ZCA-96-6 Single Family Development Standards Land Use and Planning Board Minutes October 28, 1996 Jim Flick, 9408 S 218th Street. Mr. Flick described his situation and explained that he is currently unable to subdivide his property. He requested that the Board make a recommendation to accept staff's proposed changes. Board member Ron Harmon MOVED to close the public hearing. The motion was SECONDED by Board member Tom Brotherton. Motion carried. Ron Harmon MOVED to recommend to City Council that they approve the staff recommended changes to the maximum permitted densities in the single family zones. The motion was seconded by Vice Chair Brad Bell. Motion carried. 7 #ZCA-96-5 Mixed Use Zoning 9ZCA-96-6 Single Family Development Standards Kent City Council Meeting Date November 5 . 1996 Category Bids 1. SUBJECT: SE 274TH WAY HILLCLIMB SECTION (GREEN RIVER ROAD TO 108TH AVENUE SE) GROUND IMPROVEMENTS 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Bid opening for this project was held on November 14th with 4 bids received. The low bid was submitted by Hayward Baker, Inc. of Santa Paula, California, in the amount of $117 , 500. The Engineer' s estimate was $120, 000. The project consists of ground improvements on approximately 1/2 acre of land by the alternate method of either Alternate I deep dynamic compaction, or Alternate II stone columns, for the preparation of the roadway bridge over the Green River. It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director that the SE 274th Way Hillclimb Section (Green River Road to 108th Ave. SE) Ground Improvements, Alternate II Stone Columns contract be awarded to Hayward Baker, Inc. for the bid amount of $117, 500. 3 . EXHIBITS: Public Works Director memorandum 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Director (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $117 , 500 SOURCE OF FUNDS: 272nd/277th Street Corridor Project 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember�_movesz� Councilmembe seconds-/ that the SE 274th Way Hillclimb Section (Green River Road to 108th Avenue SE) Ground Improvements, Alternate II Stone Columns contract be awarded to Hayward Baker, Inc. for the bid amount of $117 , 500 . DISCUSSION: ? n ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 5A DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS November 14, 1996 TO: Mavor & City Council FROM: Don Wickstrom L1J"U RE: SE 274th Way Hillclimb Section (Green River Road to 108th Ave SE) Ground Improvements Bid opening for this project was held on November 14 with 4 bids received. The low bid was submitted by Havward Baker, Inc. in the amount of S 1 17,500.00 for Alternate I1, Stone Columns. The engineer's estimate for Alternate 11 was $120,000.00. It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director that the SE 274th Wav Hillclimb (Green River Road to 108th Ave SE) Ground Improvements, Alternate 11 contract be awarded to Havward Balcer, Inc., for the bid amount of S 1 17,500.00 BID SUMMARY Alternate 11 Alternate Hayward Balser, Inc. 117,500.00 Frank COIUC60 179,500.00 Robison Construction 190,590,00 Gaston Bros. 193,600.00 Engineer's Estimate 120,000.00 Engineer's Estimate 173,600.00 MOTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds that the SE 274th Way Hillclimb (Green River Road to 108th Ave SE) Ground Improvements, Alternate II contract be awarded to Hayward Balcer, Inc., for the bid amount of S 1 17,500.00 CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS A. R E P O R T S A. COUNCIL PRE SIDENT ��)) B. OPERATIONS COMMITTEE v - C. PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE�ii J Zt�f2 D. PLANNING COMMITTEE (/JL� E. PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE 77 � F. PARKS COMMITTEE G. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS' CITY OF KENT PARKS COMMITTEE MEETING NOVEMBER 5, 1996 Council Present: Chair substitute Christie Houser; Connie Epperly, Jon Johnson Staff Present: John Hodgson; Lori Hogan, Barbara Ekstrom. Helen Wickstrom. Laurie Evezich. Helen Wickstrom, Jim McDonald, Lori Hogan, Tracey Wickersham, Teri Petrole-Stump Others Present: Jennifer Stoner; Carol Mauritsen: Donna Pfingston; Drew Pfingston: Cindy Mauritsen; Aggie Mauritsen: Linda Johnson, Kent Downtown Partnership/Saturday Market; Candy Howard, Saturday Market; Carol McPherson, Arts Commission: .lim Stone, S.S.M.D. Christie Houser substituted for Judy Woods in her absence. Saturday Market Report: Candy Howard, Coordinator of the Kent Saturday Market distributed a final report and revenue comparison for the 1996 season. This was the first year the market was open Saturday and Sunday. Candy explained revenue was down $3,329 compared to 1995 because of 20 less spaces at Cornucopia and inclement weather. Results of a vendor survey for 1996 will be submitted to the Parks Department. The market will remain in the parking lot for the 1997 season and will not be moving into the building until funding for renovation has been secured. Salt Air Hills Vista Park: Helen Wickstrom stated that several years ago the City acquired two acres from a King County Conservation Futures Grant to develop the Salt Air Hills site. Colie Hough-Beck of Hough-Beck & Baird was hired to develop a master plan of the park. Prior to master planning, a citizen advisory committee met twice and a public meeting was held to collect a list of the needs and wants of the community. Using dots to represent desired park amenities, an enthusiastic group of 30-35 neighbors participated. Colie outlined their requests: Preserve pea patch. Construct new large play area with visibility to the street, surrounded by hard surface for roller blades, boards and bikes. Provide an open shelter. Include one open area for mixed play. Maintain the forest, but prune and thin, with a trail looping around the park. Create a plaza area. Install interpretive signage at the wetland area. Re-name the park to Salt Air Hills Vista Park. The plan respects the site and environment and eventually will adjoin the City of Des Moines park which borders the site. Parks Committee Minutes November 5, 1996 Page Two Connie Epperly moved to accept the proposed Salt Air Hills Vista Park Master Plan. Jon Johnson seconded. Motion passed 3-0. 1997 City Art Plan Budget and 1997 - 2001 Five-Year Art Plan: Jim McDonald, Cultural Services Program Coordinator introduced Carol McPherson, Chair of the Kent Arts Commission. Jim stated the budget for the City Art Program projects must be prepared, updated and accepted by City Council annually. The proposed projects were summarized: Develop a Centennial Center glass exhibit by hiring a professional artist, or team, to design, create and install artwork specifically for the City of Kent and the site. Working with and commemorating the rich history of the Japanese-American community, the grounds of the historical Bereiter House may be the site for an exterior art project. Continuing the City's interest in supporting art projects created by youth working with artists, three Reclamation Art Projects will be completed. The site and content to be determined by the youth in cooperation with the artist and the Parks Department staff. Continue to purchase high quality artwork (portable artwork) from the Canterbury Faire Juried Fine Art Exhibit to be exhibited in public accessible areas within the City of Kent. Within the 1997-2001 City Art Plan, Jim highlighted that funding includes planning for the Performing Arts Center in 1999. and artwork for the Center in the year 2000. Carol commented how pleased they were with the Japanese community sharing their background, history and what they want and don't want for the community art project. She added the youth art program had a very strong focus generating a lot of interest from teens. Working with an artist as a mentor, the youth are motivated to give back to the community. Connie Epperly moved to accept the 1997 City Art Plan Budget and 1997 - 2001 Five-Year Art Plan. Jon Johnson seconded. Motion passed 3-0. Riverbend Golf Complex Management Study Program Report: John Hodgson reported the Task Force has met three times. It is going very well, with a good cross section of golfers and non-golfers, but thev are not ready to make a recommendation as vet. He added that a special Parks Committee meeting will be scheduled in November to present the Task Force's final report. Jon Johnson stated the Task Force meeting on November 7 will conclude with a final recommendation. Meeting adjourned at 5:00 p.m. to Executive Session. Final Report 1996 Kent Market Season: November 5, 1996 Parks Committee This was the first year the Market was open on Sundays and we feel it was a success. On our best Sundav we had 70 vendors and our worst we had no vendors. We offered free space when weather was poor or as an incentive to brim in vendors. We found that the vendors on Sundays were not repeat vendors from Saturday but a totally new set of vendors We also observed that we had more local farmers and flower vendors on Sundays. We will send a survey to all of the vendors that participated in the Market this season to evaluate the lensth of the season. We increased the season this year based on the survey for 1995_ We will use the results to guide the season for 1997 We are actively pursuing the funding for the Market building on Railroad Ave N. We do not feel that we will be ready to occupy the new location nest season. Our intention is to remain in our current location for the 1997 season Our Total revenues for 1996 were 539,732. We fell behind 1995 by 53,329, we can account for 51.700 of the lost revenue in the 20 less spaces available at Cornucopia We also fell that the li plus weeks of rain and 3 weeks of cose to 100 degree weather did effect the Market in a negative wav T he City of Kent wiil receive 55.000 above the S25,000 contract- Kent Downtown Partnership will receive the reaming balance of 59,732 from the City of Kent in compliance with our contract Overall we feel the Market was a success and we will spend the next few months out recruiting new vendors for the 1997 season. Thank you for your continued support Candy Howard, Market Coordinator Kent Downtown Partnership Linda Johnson, Executive Director Kent Downtown Partnership Kent Market 1995/1996 Comparison Total Date Weekly Total Date Weekl° Revenue Revenue 4/13/96 S5998 S5998 $6863 S9417 4120/96 5864 4/2919; S8417 4/27/96 S914 S7776 52086 S10;03 S1300 $9076 ;/6/9 5/4/96 2 ;11319; S1724 S12227 ;/11/96 $1656 51073_ 51;69;/20/9; $13796 5/18/96 $821 $11553 S1631 S1;427 513136 --5C ; ;/2;/96 S 1;83 51833�_, $17260 6/3/) 6/1196 5192; $15061 S19885 S18971 53910 6110/9; S262; 6/8/96 6i17/96 53357 523342 6/15/96 S2843 S21841 81 S23674 5261 6/24/96 S.939 ; 6/22196 S1833 7/1/9� S2o71 S282-_ 6/29/96 S2009 S25683 52440 S30692 $_s61� $2936 � 7/s/ J6l)6 SL183 S3187; Cornucopia S991 529610 �11a/9� 5907 S30;17 Cornucopia 7R0/96 S129 533168 7/27/96 S1220 s3: S33812 S32420 S/;i9; S644 533423 5733 8/3/96 S68; S34;4; R/12!9i 8/lo/96 Slo03 8;19"I; Sy34 S3;;29 8/17/96 S1008 S34431 S36668 $35486 8/261`) St 1 8/24196 S 10�; $36218 9/2/96 S926 S37594 8/31/96 S73_5662 S104; S38639 $36880 9/9/9; 9/7/96 539642 9/lo/9; S1003 S287 537167 Sill') S407;; 9/21/96 S528 S 9114/96 yh�� 3769; 9G0/9; S;'1 S41276 9/28/96 57;0 $3844; l0/7?9` 5771 542047 10/i/96 S31; S39760 S1014 S43061 10/1'/96 $4'6 539196 10/1419; lo/19/96 S183 S39379 (3329) 10/26/96 S353 S39732 ER SE PUBLIC MEETING NOVEMBER 13, 199 7 :00 P.M. KENT SENIOR CENTER The City of Kent has recently purchased the historical 1907 Jack Keck residence, located at 855 E Smith Street. The firm of Tonkin/Hoyne/Lokan, an architecture and urban AI M� design firm, has been hired by the City to review various use 2 options for the house and to determine improvements needed to meet code compliance for the various options. While we want to preserve this beautiful, historical home for public enjoyment, we also want to be a good neighbor and would like to share ideas with you and receive your input. Please join us on Wednesday, November 13, 1996, 7:00 p.m. in the Dry Crafts Room of the Kent Senior Center to discuss the future use of this historical facility. The Kent Senior Center is located at 600 East Smith. If you have any questions, or can't make the meeting and would like to give input over the phone, please contact Helen Wickstrom at 859-3994 or John Hodgson at 8593992. hs005657 10/26/96 BRENDA JACOBER (Please put in Council agenda CITY of 2Zi`1 packet) Jim White, Mayor CITY COUNCIL PLANNING COMINUTTEE VUNUTES October 15, 1996 Planning Committee Members Present: City Attorney's Office Leona Orr, Chair Laurie Evezich Tim Clark Jon Johnson Planninlz Staff Jim Harris, Planning Director Fred Satterstrom, Planning Manager Lin Houston. Human Services Manager Margaret Porter, Administrative Assistant III HEARING EXAMINER DECISION APPEAL PROCESS - (L. Evezich) Assistant City Attorney Ms. Evezich presented the Committee with a copy of a draft Ordinance relating to the judicial appeal process of the Hearing Examiner's decisions. The proposed amendments would bring the appeal procedures for the Kent Hearing Examiner in compliance with the new state law requirement under the Land Use Petition Act (LLB'A). The LUPA provides a statutory appeal period of twenty-one days. The original intention behind the LUPA was to expedite land use appeals and matters that could be defined as land use decisions under that statute and to coordinate that process with regulatory reform which is also passed in 1995. This will be the first step of a two part process in bringing the City into compliance with both LL'PA and regulatory reform. Committee member Tim Clark MOVED and Committee member Jon Johnson SECONDED the motion to recommend approval of the draft Ordinance with the proposed amendments to the judicial appeal process of the City of Kent Hearing Examiner and forward this item to the November 5 City Concil meeting. Motion carved. Ms. Evezich informed the Committee that there will be other related amendments necessary to bring our policies in compliance with LUPA. These additional amendments will require a public hearing and the recommendation of the Land Use and Planning Board for further action. HUMAN SERVICES iViITIGATION FOR REGIONAL .I JSTICE CENTER (L. Houston) Human Services Planner Lin Houston presented the Committee with an update on the status of the Human Services mitigation agreement relating to the impacts of the Regional Justice Center. King County has given the City of Kent money to evaluate the impacts of the Regional Justice Center on the nonprofit human services delivery system and to develop a standardized data collection system for agencies. "U lih wF SO 'KENT W ASHINGTON 080,'-i804;TCLGPHON[ F\A 4 xO-dal City Council Planning Committee Minutes October 15, 1996 The Planning Department is in the process of hiring a consultant. The consultant will be responsible for conducting a study in two phases. Phase One will be completed prior to the RJC opening and Phase Two will begin one year after the Regional Justice Center opens. Phase One is scheduled to begin on December 2 and conclude February 29, 1997. Phase One will set up a data collection process and methodology to enable agencies to measure the impact of the RJC on human servicves delivery. It will consist of the following: • Identifying the types of services impacted and determine the geographic boundaries of the study. • Collaborate with agencies to determine the best method to collect and report the needed data to assess any impacts. • Develop an application for agencies to seek compensation for services. The County will provide funding for the City to reimburse agencies for services related to the RJC. The funding is provided through the Inmates Benefit Fund and will range from a minimum of $38,000 to a maximum of$75,600 a year. The annual dollar amount is calculated based on the Average Daily Population of the Regional Justice Center. Phase Two will determine how effectively the human services system is serving users from the RJC and will identify any gaps in service. This process will be repeated after three years to assess how well the RJC is addressing the human services needs of its population. Ms. Houston indicated that the draft Consultant Contract would be ready for the November 19 Planning Committee meeting and requested that the contract be forwarded the same night to the City Council for consideration. Chair Orr requested that Ms. Houston provide the full Council a copy of the Consultant Contract for their review prior to the Council meeting on November 19. POLICY FOR AGRIGULTURAL PRESERVATION - (L. Orr/J. Harris) Chair Orr recommended that the City draft a policy that would illistrate the City's support for the preservation of farmlands. The City is in the process of annexing a portion of property that is included in King County's agriculture Preservation District. Mr. Harris agreed that a policy depicting the City's stand on this issue could be beneficial. Tim Clark questioned whether the City would need to develop a long detailed policy or if a general policy would be effective. Mr. Harris responded that the Planning Department could develop some drafts for the Committee to consider and then decide how detailed the policy would need to be. Mr. Harris indicated that a general statement could be sufficient. however, to ensure the policy is effective the policy should be specific. The Committee concluded that the City needs a definite policy to demonstrate the City's stand on Agricultural Preservation. Mr. Harris agreed to present the Committee with some policy alternatives at the November 19 meeting. City Council Planning Committee Minutes October 15, 1996 ALLOWANCE OF MOTHER-IN-LAW APARTMENTS - (L. Orr) Chair Orr suggested that the City retook at the Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) Ordinance which allows for mother-in-law apartments. She discussed the issue of units already in existence which do not quite meet the development standards. She believes that the Land Use and Planning Board needs to take a look at the Zoning Code and make a determination if there is some way to make amendments or modifications to the Ordiance in order to help these "Grandfathered in" dwelling units. Chair Orr is asking for the Committee's concurrence to ask the Planning Board to take this item under consideration. Committee member Tim Clark indicated that he would like to make this a working policy. Clark MOVED to send this item to the Land Use and Planning Board for their consideration. Committe member Johnson SECONDED the motion. Planning Director Jim Harris explained that the Land Use'and Planning Board is in the process of considering administrative variance procedures. These procedures would allow an administrative variance from the Planning Director and make it easier for applicants to get a small amount of relief. Harris believes that Accessory Dwelling Units could dovetailed appropriately into the Administrative Variance item already under consideration by the Planning Board. The Committee concurred. Motion carried. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 4:25 p.m. U:\DOC\PCOM\MINUTESTCO 1015.MIN PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE November 6. I ()()() PRESENT: Jon Johnson Don Wickstrom Connie Epperly Tom Brubaker ABSENT: Tim Clarlc judv Woods Stoneaate Knolls Plat Tom Brubaker noted at the last Committee meeting there was extended discussion regarding the provision of emergency access to Stonegate Knolls . The basic information as provided, is that some progress has been made although there has been no final decision reached on the emergency access by the developer and some of the adjoining propertv owners. There may be a solution in the works however, there is no other information provided at this time. Brubaker suggested that this the item be deterred until such time as staff deems it necessary to return it to this Committee. Committee concurred. U12 Front Street Improvements vs. No Protest LID Covenants Wickstrom stated that this issue emerged with the creation of L.I.D. 345 (21 Sth Street Improvement) and there are questions of whether we should require developers to do up front improvements, which we have been doing, or require them to execute covenants. He said we have been doing it both ways. Wickstrom said what we do is very similar to what occurs in Renton, Tukwila, Auburn and Federal Way. However we have more flexibility of when to defer the improvements. Wickstrom noted that we have been able to put together approximately S32 million worth of projects by using what we have been doing in the past - essentially if there are major arterials anticipated for improvements we typically required covenants versus the up-front improvements. The covenants that we do require are just deferrals - a ten vear deferral at the maximum and at the end of 10 vears if there are no LID projects, the property owner must put in those improvements. Wickstrom said the issue here is. do we continue to grant deferrals or do we require hard improvements up front along with the building permit. Lately our trend has been to require up front improvements because we are dealing with alot of plats, short plats and single family residences primarily in the East Hill area. He noted that — 1 we have been more successful with LIDS in the industrial, commercial and multi-family properties. In the past 27 years we have never formed a street improvement for a residential area. Thev are not palatable with the residents and thev are not successful when brought before Council. Lately we have required more up front improvements rather than the LID covenants. Jon Johnson stated that he has always been favorable towards the up front street improvements because it solves problems at the time of the plat, basically not having to retrofit something later on. With regard to arterials, Wicicstrom noted when we don't know how the alignment will fit and when we try to match piece-meal improvements, sometimes we have to design it to fit what's existing and in the long run it will change When we look at all the roads we have built, most of those arterials are in now and have been built with the support of LIDS. Our trend is towards hard improvements up front. Wicicstrom suggested that a formal form of poticv from Council be given to direct us to require up Front improvements. Brubaker stated that he will draft a Resolution for review and approval at the next Committee meeting. Permit Parking Ordinance Amendment Brubaker stated that the purpose of this Ordinance is to transfer authority to issue parking permits in the Centennial Center and Citv Hall from the Transportation Engineer to the Facilities Manager. During the discussion of this ordinance at the last Committee meeting, Leona Orr pointed out that this draft Ordinance established a 30 minute parking limit for the parking area between the Centennial Center and Citv Hall, which she found to be unacceptable. Brubaker stated there is no reason to continue with this 30 minute limit and it will be stricken from the Ordinance. Committee unanimously recommended approving the draft ordinance with the amendment of striking Section 9.38.080 Sub-Section 8 from the Ordinance. Code Revision Brubaker said there is a Public Works provision in the Citv Code which states that Public Works projects shall comply with the 1988 version of the Washington State Dept of Transportation Standards Specifications for Roads, Bridges and Highways. This section should reference the latest version. Committee unanimouslv recommended that the Citv Attornev amend Section 6.02.010 of the Citv Code to incorporate the latest revision of the Wa State Specifications. Adde_iten''ss: Saar Street Vacation v for this Wicicstrom asked For Committee's concurrenceothe School Pedestrian Walk'w fund.et vacation is received, that it be deposited Committee unanimously concurred. S 21 Sth Street LandscaoinQ LID 345 le for ping now that the Mrs. Rust of 8619 S. 21Sth St. asked who wa�respo�o11bsaid the Planning Dept requi es S. 21 Sth Street improvements are complete. said when property owners to landscape their prop He a�dit onalerighedgeof wav of thepf om the pr perty owner. we build a road, often times we require wAe }ien we remove the landscaping' it has it landscaping a d they areth tno those regli required oeresto becsnit nonconforming with respect to Meeting adjourned: 4:20 p-rn. Cityof Kent F it Council Meetingv Agenda CITY OF Mayor Jim White Council Members Christi Houser, President Jim Bennett Jon Johnson Tim Clark Leona Orr Connie Epperly Judy Woods Novemberler, 1996 26 Office of the City Clerk CITY Or SUMMARY AGENDA r I KENT CITY COUNCIL MEETING November 19 , 1996 Council Chambers 7 : 00 p.m. MAYOR: Jim White COUNCILMEMBERS: Christi Houser, President Tim Clark Connie Epperly Jim Bennett Judy Woods Jon Johnson Leona Orr CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL 1. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Appointees A. Introduction of Mayor' s B. Proclamation - Education Day C. Regional Justice Center Update D. Task Force Report on School Impact Fees 2 . PUBLIC HEARINGS Ordinance A. 1997 Budget (Continued) 3 . CONSENT CALENDAR A. Approval of Minutes B . Approval of Bills Approval and C. Salt Air Hills Vista Park Master Plan - Adoption D. 1997 City Art Plan Budget and 1997-2001 Five Year Art Plan - Approval and Adoption E. LID Underwriter Selection and Bond Sale - Authorization F. Centennial Center lease Policy - Resolution G. 1997 Tax Levy - ,ordinance H. Parking Code Amendment - Ordinance I . Public Improvements Standard Specifications Code Amendment - Ordinance J. Meridian Asphalt Overlays - Accept as Complete K. Green River Court Apartments - Bill of Sale L. Park Court Apartments - Bill of Sale M. 98th Avenue Treatment Pond - Accept as Complete N. Saar Street Vacation Fund STV-96-4 - Deposit Authorization 0. Canyon Crest Estates Final Plat FSU-96-6 - Set Meeting Date P. Transit Advisory Board - Appointment Q. Library Board - Appointment R. Human Services Commission - Appointment 4 . OTHER BUSINESS A. Human Services Mitigation Consultant Contract - Authorization B. Single Family Residential Zoning District Regulations ZCA-96-6 5 . BIDS A. SE 274th Way Hillclimb Section (Green River Road to 108th Avenue SE) Ground Improvements 6 . CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS 7 . REPORTS EXECUTIVE SESSION: Property Acquisition 8 . ADJOURNMENT NOTE: A copy of the full agenda packet is available for perusal in the City Clerk's Office and the Kent Library. An explanation of the agenda format is given on the back of this page. Any person requiring a disability accommodation should contact the City in advance for more information. For TDD relay service call 1-800-635-9993 or the City of Kent(206)854-658T PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Citizens wishing to address the Council will, at this time, make known the subject of interest, so all may be properly heard. A) Introduction of Mayor' s Appointees B) Proclamation - Education Day C) Regional Justice Center Update D) Task Force Report on School Impact Fees ?-1 Kent City Council Meeting Date November 19 , 1996 Category Public Hearings 1 . SUBJECT: 1997 BUDGET - ORDINANCE 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: The public hearing on the 1997 Budget has been continued to this date. Public input is desired and welcome. The 1997 Budget totals approximately $91, 233 , 825 and the Budget is in balance with no rate increase. The Budget Document is available at the City Clerk's Office. The Finance Director will give a brief presentation. 3 . EXHIBITS: 1997 Preliminary Budget document (available in City Clerk' s Office) and ordinance, including Exhibits A & B 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Operations Committee (3-0) (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES X 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: various per 1997 Budget ordinance OPEN HEARING: PUBLIC INPUT: CLOSE HEARING: 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds to adopt Ordinance No. adopting the final 1997 Budget. DISCUSSION: ACTION• Council Agenda Item No. 2A Demo Date: November 14, 1996 To: Council From: May Miller, Director of Finance Subject: 1997 BUDGET As recommended by the Operations Committee at their November 13 meeting, authorization is requested to adopt the 1997 Budget as presented in the Preliminary Budget document and Exhibits A and B. A few technical changes are included in the attached exhibits and were reviewed by the Operations Committee. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, relating to budgets and finance and adopting the final 1997 fiscal year budget. WHEREAS, the tax estimates and budget for the City of Kent, Washington, for the 1997 fiscal year have been prepared and filed as provided by law, and the budget has been printed and distributed, and notice has been published in the official paper of the City of Kent setting the time and place for hearing, and that notice stated that all taxpayers calling at the Office of the Citv Clerk would be furnished a copy of the 1997 budget; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS. Section 1 Bud?et Adoption. Pursuant to RCW 35A.33.075, the budget for the 1997 fiscal year, as summarized on Exhibit A and as set forth in the 1997 preliminary comprehensive budget, as amended by Exhibit B, all of which are incorporated in this ordinance by this reference as if fully set forth herein, is hereby adopted in the amounts and for the purposes established in that budget as the final budget for Cites 1997 fiscal year. Section 2. Transmittal. The Finance Director shall transmit a complete copy of the final adopted budget to the Division of Municipal Corporations in the Office of the State Auditor and to the Association of Washington Cities. Budget Ordinance I Section 3. Adjustments. City Administration shall administer the Annual Budget and in doing so may authorize adjustments pursuant to RCW 35A.33.120. Section 4. Severability. If anv section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance. Section 5. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force five (5) days from and after the date of publication of this ordinance. JLNI WHITE_ MAYOR ATTEST: BRE'TNDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: ROGER A. LLBOVICH, CITY ATTORNEY � Budget Ordinance i I 11 PASSED day of 1996_ APPROVED day of 1996. PUBLISHED day of , 1996. I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No. passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the City of Kent as hereon indicated. (SEAL) BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK p i\ordtnmc\budget.ord 3 Budget Ordinance CITY OF KENT,WASHINGTON 1997 BUDGET ORDINANCE EXHIBIT A Inc(Dec) Beginning Ending in Fund Fund Fund Revenues Expenditures Balance Balance Balance GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS GENERAL FUND 43,793,429 43.945,090 (151,661) 4.082,376 3,930,715 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS Street 4,722.939 3,889,067 833.872 528279 1,362,151 Youth/Teen Programs 512,435 514,382 11,947) 257,073 255,126 Capital Improvement 4,346.711 3,930,152 416,559 762,425 1,178,984 Criminal Justice 1,512.169 1,780.589 (268,420) 276.505 8,085 Environmental Mitigation 342,648 421,611 (78,963) 173,429 94,466 Community Block Grant 576,263 576.263 Other Operating Projects 235,000 264.372 (29,372) 29,372 DEBT SERVICE FUNDS Voted 1,850,707 1,835.428 15,279 34.721 50,000 Councilmanic 2,807,429 2,807,429 Special Assessment 2,137,993 2,700,714 (562,721) 2,016,457 1.453,736 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS Street Projects 3,252.669 3,252.669 Parks Projects 265,929 349,844 (83.915) 83,915 Other Projects 203,000 203,000 PROPRIETARY FUNDS ENTERPRISE FUNDS Water 7,069,881 7,001,309 68,572 2.391,404 2,459,976 Sewerage 17,750,732 21492.435 (4,741,703) 5,982,363 1,240,660 Golf Complex 2,601,418 2.538.547 62,871 183,207 246.078 INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS Equipment Rental 1,920.941 1,933.802 (12.861) 1,936,927 1,924,066 Central Services 2.832,615 2.824,875 7.740 7,740 Fire Equipment 251.348 120393 130,955 182.540 313.495 Facilities Fund 3,108,115 3,308.115 (200,000) 850.069 650,069 Insurance 5,316,177 5.671,742 (355.565) 3,982.312 3.626,747 FIDUCIARY FUNDS TRUST AND AGENCY FUNDS Firemen's Pension 206,380 209,150 (2.770) 2288.064 2285,294 Economic Development Corp 15,330 11,085 4,245 12,445 16,690 TOTAL GROSS BUDGET 107,632.258 112.582.063 (4.949,805) 26,053.883 21,104,078 LESS: Internal Service Funds 12,137,194 12.137,194 Other Transfers 9.211,044 9,211,044 TOTAL BUDGET 86,284,020 9L233,825 (4.949.805) 26.053.883 21.104.078 CITY OF KENT,WASHINGTON 1997 BUDGET ORDINANCE CHANGES TO PRELIMINARY BUDGET EXHIBIT B Inc(Dec) Beginning Ending in Fund Fund Fund Revenues Expenditures Balance Balance Balance GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS GENERAL FUND 43,768,227 43,919,888 (151,661) 4,082,376 3,930,715 Police-Increase Public Education Specialist 5,490 (5,490) (5,490) Adjust Court space rental 5,530 (5,530) (5,530) Adjust for Criminal Justice revenues 29,267 (6,480) 35,747 35,747 Adjust fine revenues in Police (25,065) (25,065) (25,065) Transfer seized assets for Police ditty bags 21,000 21,000 Adjust contracts for legal services 15,000 (15,000) (15,000) Adjust Internal rates 1,800 (1,800) (1,800) Decrease contingency (17,138) 17,138 17,138 ----------------- ----------------- ------------------------------------------------- Total General Fund 43,793,429 43,945,090 (151,661) 4,082,376 3,930,715 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS Street 4,722,939 3,889,067 833,872 528,279 1,362,151 Youth/Teen Programs 512,415 514,382 (1,947) 257,073 255,126 Capital improvement 4,346,711 3,730,152 616,559 862,425 1,478,984 Fire Station 75 Purchase 200,000 (200,000) (100,000) (300,000) ----------------- ----------------- ------------------------------------------------- Total Capital Improvement 4,346,711 3,930,152 416,559 762,425 1,178,984 Criminal Justice 1,469,203 1,723,157 (254,154) 262,239 8,085 Adjust per capita revenueslexpenditures 21,966 36,232 (14,266) 14,266 Transfer seized assets for ditty bag purchase 21,000 21,000 ----------------- ----------------- ------------------------------------------------- Total Criminal Justice Fund 1,512,169 1,780,589 (268,420) 276,505 8,085 Environmental Mitigation 342,648 421,611 (78,963) 173,429 94,466 Community Block Grant 576,263 576,263 Other Operating Projects 235,000 264,372 (29,372) 29,372 DEBT SERVICE FUNDS Voted 1,850,707 1,835,428 15,279 34,721 50,000 Councilmanic 2,607,429 2,607,429 Fire Station 75 debt 200,000 200,000 ----------------- ----------------- ------------------------------------------------- Total Councilmanic 2,807,429 2,807,429 Special Assessment 2,137,993 2.700,714 (562,721) 2,016,457 1,453,736 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS Street Projects 3,252,669 33,252,669 Parks Projects 265,929 349,844 (83,915) 83,915 Other Projects 203,000 203,000 CITY OF KENT,WASHINGTON 1997 BUDGET ORDINANCE CHANGES TO PRELIMINARY BUDGET EXHIBIT B Inc(Dec) Beginning Ending in Fund Fund Fund Revenues Expenditures Balance Balance Balance PROPRIETARY FUNDS ENTERPRISE FUNDS Water 7,069,881 7,001,309 68,572 2,391,404 2,459,976 Sewerage 17,550,732 22,292.435 (4,741,703) 5,982,363 1,240,660 Adjust Metro charges to trend 200,000 200,000 ----------------- ----------------- ------------------------------------------------- Total Sewerage Fund 17,750,732 22,492,435 (4,741,703) 5,982,363 1,240,660 Golf Complex 2,601,418 2,538,547 62,871 183,207 246,078 INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS Equipment Rental 1,920,941 1,933,802 (12,861) 1,936,927 1,924,066 Central Services 2,830,815 2,823,075 7,740 7,740 Adjust Internal rates 1,800 1.800 ----------------- ----------------- ------------------------------------------------- Total Central Service Fund 2,832,615 2,824,875 7,740 7,740 Fire Equipment 251,348 120.393 130,955 182,540 113,495 Facilities Fund 3,102,585 3,302,585 (200,000) 850,069 650,069 Adjust Court rent 5,530 5,5 30 ----------------- ----------------- ------------------------------------------------- Total Facilities Fund 3,108,115 3308,115 (200,000) 850,069 650,069 Insurance 5,316,177 5,671.742 (355,565) 3,982,312 3,626,747 FIDUCIARY FUNDS TRUST AND AGENCY FUNDS Firemen's Pension 206,380 209,150 (2,770) 2,288,064 1285,294 Economic Development Corp 15,330 11,085 4,245 12,445 16,690 TOTAL GROSS BUDGET 107,632,258 112,582,063 (4,949,805) 26,053,883 21,104,078 LESS: Internal Service Funds 12,137,194 12,137.194 Other Transfers 9,211,044 9,211,044 TOTAL BUDGET 86,284,020 91,233,825 (4,949,805) 26,051883 21,104,078 Memorandum only -The proposed budget includes the conversion of one full timejob share position in Fire for the SARA Title III program to 2 regular part time positions.This conversion results in no change in FTE's. The dollar impacts are already included,but notation of the position conversion had not been made. CONSENT CALENDAR 3 . City Council Action: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds that Consent Calendar Items A through R be approved. Discussion Action 3A. Approval of Minutes. Approval of the minutes of the regular Council meeting of November 5, 1996 . 3B. Approval of Bills. Approval of payment of the bills received through October 31 and paid on October 31, 1996, after auditing by the Operations Committee on November 6, 1996 . Approval of checks issued for vouchers: Date Check Numbers Amount 10/31/96 175609-176255 $2 , 274 , 598 . 05 Approval of checks issued for payroll for October 1 through October 15 , 1996 and paid on October 18, 1996: Date Check Numbers Amount 11/5/96 Checks 215392-215708 $ 250, 463 . 71 11/5/96 Advices 39565-40027 584 444 . 46 $ 834 , 908 . 17 Council Agenda Item No. 3 A-B Kent, Washington November 5, 1996 Regular meeting of the Kent City Council was called to order at 7 : 00 p.m. by Mayor White. Present: Councilmembers Bennett, Clark, Epperly, Houser, Johnson, and Orr, Operations Director/ Chief of Staff McFall, City Attorney Lubovich, Police Chief Crawford, Fire Chief Angelo, Planning Director Harris, Public Works Director Wickstrom, and Finance Director Miller. Approxi- mately 40 people were at the meeting. Councilmember Woods was excused. PUBLIC Employee of the Month. Mayor White announced COMMUNICATIONS that Neldon Hewitt, Public Works Operations Utilities Superintendent, has been selected as Employee of the Month for November. He noted that Hewitt is responsible for managing and maintaining the sewer and storm system, and that he deserves to be recognized for long standing contributions to the Public Works Department and his many years of service to the City. Introduction of Mayor's Appointee. Mayor White introduced Linda Denny, his appointee to the Kent Arts Commission. Human Services Month. Mayor White read a pro- clamation declaring November 1996 as Human Services Month in the City of Kent. He noted that the City Council has established that 1% of the General Revenue budget from the previous year will be the level of funding for human services, and encouraged all citizens to recognize and support Human Services Month. He invited citizens to visit the Human Services displays in the lobby of City Hall and at the Kent Library. The proclamation was presented to Brad Bell, who noted that in 1995 28 , 000 Kent residents were served. He added that the funding will service 16 separate agencies and 24 different programs. Bell expressed appreciation for the support and for the proclamation. CONSENT HOUSER MOVED to approve Consent Calendar Items A CALENDAR through K with the exception of Item G which was removed. Orr seconded and the motion carried. MINUTES (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3A) Approval of Minutes. APPROVAL of the minutes of the regular Council meeting and the Council workshop of October 15 , 1996 . 1 November 5 , 1996 HEALTH & (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3H) SANITATION Newman Short Plat. ACCEPTANCE of the bill of sale for the Newman Short Plat submitted by Newman Construction for continuous operation and maintenance of 28 feet of storm sewer and 71 feet of sanitary sewer improvements, and release of bonds after the expiration period, as recommended by the Public Works Director. This project is located at S. 224th and 94th Avenue South. STREET (PUBLIC HEARINGS - ITEM 2A) VACATION Saar Street/Railroad Avenue Street Vacation STV-96-6. This public hearing has been set to consider an application to vacate a portion of Saar Street lying east of S. Railroad Avenue, as referenced in Resolution No. 1483 . Planning Director Harris pointed out the location on the map. He noted that staff recommends vacating ten feet rather than twelve feet as requested by the applicant, and that a 25-foot radius be provided at each end of the vacation. He pointed out that the staff report also out- lines conditions regarding retaining utility easements and being compensated as per City ordinance. Mayor White opened the public hearing. There were no comments from the audience and HOUSER MOVED to close the public hearing. Orr seconded and the motion carried. ORR MOVED to approve the Planning Director' s recommendation of approval of an application to vacate a portion of Saar Street lying east of S. Railroad Avenue, as referenced in Resolution No. 1483 , and to direct the City Attorney to prepare the necessary ordinance upon receipt of compensation and retainment of the utility easement. Bennett seconded and the motion carried. PUBLIC WORKS (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3E) ISTEA Funding. AUTHORIZATION for the Mayor to sign the ISTEA Grant Fund Agreement for Citywide Pedestrian & Bicycle Facility Improvements, and Pacific Highway South HOV Lanes and direct staff to accept the grant and establish a budget in the amount of $1, 336 , 000, as recommended by the Public Works Committee. 2 November 5 , 1996 PUBLIC WORKS (BIDS - ITEM 5A) South 277th Street Corridor Pedestrian Bridge over Green River. Bid opening for this project was held on October 31st with nine bids received. The low bid was received by Donald Murphy Contractors, Federal Way, in the amount of $495, 843 . 72 . The Engineer' s estimate was $510, 070. 00. The construction of this bridge will facilitate transport of fill material to the west side of the Green river where it is needed. When the South 277th street Corridor project is opened as scheduled in 1999, this bridge will become the bicycle/pedestrian bridge along that corridor. It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director that the South 277th Street Corridor Pedestrian Bridge contract be awarded to Donald Murphy Contractors for the bid amount of $495 , 843 . 72 . CLARK MOVED that the South 277th Street Corridor Pedestrian Bridge contract be awarded to Donald Murphy Contractors for the bid amount of $495, 843 .72 . Bennett seconded and the motion carried. PLAT (OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4A) Canterbury Greens Preliminary Plat (SU-96-4) . This date has been set to consider the Hearing Examiner' s recommendation for conditional approval of an application by Canterbury Greens Associates for a 19-lot single family residential preliminary subdivision. The property is located south of SE 264th Street at 126th Avenue SE (if extended) . ORR MOVED to accept the Findings of the Hearing Examiner and to adopt the Hearing Examiner' s recommendation of approval with twenty-eight (28) conditions of the Canterbury Greens 19-lot single family residential preliminary subdivision. Houser seconded and the motion carried. HEARING (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3F) EXAMINER Hearing Examiner Decision Appeal Process. ADOPTION of Ordinance No. 3320 relating to the judicial appeal process of the Hearing Examiner' s 3 November 5, 1996 HEARING decisions, as recommended by the Planning EXAMINER Committee. This ordinance will bring the appeal procedures for the Kent Hearing Examiner into compliance with the new State requirements under the Land Use Petition Act (LUPA) . COUNCIL (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3K) (ADDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT HOUSER) Council Absence. APPROVAL of an excused absence from tonight' s meeting for Councilmember Woods. APPOINTMENT (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3I) Rent Arts Commission. CONFIRMATION of the Mayor' s appointment of Linda Denny to serve as a member of the Kent Arts Commission. Ms. Denny has been a resident of Kent for more than 23 years and is employed by the Kent School District where she works at East Hill Elementary school. She has a degree in Art Education from the University of Washington. She has been active as a volunteer with the City of Renton as well as her work in Kent with Canterbury Faire and as Chair of the Juried Art Show. Ms. Denny will replace Frank Zaratkiewicz . Her term will become effective immediately and will continue to 10/31/97 . MAINTENANCE (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3C) Kent Commons Air Conditioning. ACCEPT as com- plete the Kent Commons air conditioning project and authorize release of retainage upon receipt of the release of lien from the Department of Labor. (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3D) Copier Contract. AUTHORIZATION for the Mayor to sign three year contracts with Copiers Northwest for 24 fleet copiers and with Xerox for one high volume copier for the printshop. PARKS & (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3G) RECREATION (REMOVED BY COUNCILMEMBER ORR) Youth/Teen Utility Tax ordinance. The Parks Department and the Parks Committee recommended adoption of Ordinance No. 3321 amending Chapter 3 . 18 of the Kent city Code relating to utility taxes by extending the sunset provision of the interim tax assessed for youth/teen programs to December 31, 2000. In 1994 , the Kent City 4 November 5, 1996 PARKS & Council initiated a three-tenths (0. 3) percent RECREATION utility tax benefiting youth teen programs that sunsets December 31, 1996 . Orr stated that she removed this item from the Consent Calendar because of her concern about extending the tax for four years. She voiced concern about the amount of money spent on staff, and suggested reviewing this issue more often. SHE MOVED to approve the extension but for one year, through December 1997 . Bennett seconded and the motion carried. The ordinance was adopted as amended. (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3J) Lake Fen wick Restoration. ACCEPT as complete the Lake Fenwick Restoration contract with VLS Construction and release of retainage after State releases, as recommended by the Public Works Director. The original contract amount was $132 , 631. 56. The final construction cost was $123 , 830. 04 . BUDGET (PUBLIC HEARINGS - ITEM 2B) 1997 Budget. This is the second hearing on the 1997 Budget. Public input is desired and welcomed. Adoption is scheduled for November 19, 1996 . The 1997 Budget totals approximately $90, 801, 658 and the Preliminary Budget is in balance with no rate increase. The Budget Document is available in the City Clerk' s Office. Finance Director Miller stated that this is one of the most conservative budgets in recent years. She noted that due to the manufacturing tax exemption, revenues decrease by approximately $1, 100, 000 in the General Fund. She explained that $1, 000, 000 has been set aside which could be transferred to the General Fund. She noted that the General Fund includes only one half-time position, and that there are 5 . 3 additional positions in the total budget. She outlined some additions such as bicycles for the Police Patrol and Court security, and noted that continuation of the Shuttle Bus program has been included, as well as sidewalk repairs, and other capital projects approved in the Capital Facilities Plan. Miller explained that the balance in reserve has been increased to approximately $600, 000, which is the highest amount ever. She noted that the 5 November 5, 1996 BUDGET tax ordinance will go to the Operations Committee, and proposed that a dollar amount be adopted at the Council meeting of November 19 and be adjusted in December if necessary, since figures are not yet available. She noted that some technical changes will be discussed at the operations Committee meeting. The Mayor opened the public hearing. There were no comments from the audience and JOHNSON MOVED to continue the public hearing on the 1997 Budget to the November 19 , 1996 Council meeting. Orr seconded and the motion carried. FINANCE (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3B) Approval of Bills. APPROVAL of payment of the bills received through October 15 and paid on October 15 , 1996, after auditing by the Operations Committee on October 16, 1996 . Approval of checks issued for vouchers: Date Check Numbers Amount 10/15/96 175000-175608 $4 , 080 , 136. 92 _Approval of checks issued for payroll for October 1 through October 15 , 1996 and paid on October 18, 1996 : Date Check Numbers Amount 10/18/96 Checks 215076-215391 $ 551, 585. 55 10/18/96 Advices 39112-39564 302 , 761. 38 $ 854 , 356 . 93 MAYOR' S (OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4B) SALARY Mayor's Salary. The Operations Committee has recommended adjusting the salary of the Mayor to $60, 000 per year effective January 1, 1997, and to $75, 000 per year effective January 1, 1998 . Mayor White said it is his hope that there be no adjustment in the Mayor' s salary during the 1997 budget year. Director of Operations McFall explained that addressing the Mayor' s salary is a goal which was identified by Council during the Target Issue process. He added that a salary survey was done and was presented to the Operations Committee. JOHNSON MOVED that the Mayor' s salary be adjusted to $75, 000 effective January 1, 1998 . Clark seconded. 6 November 5, 1996 MAYOR' s Paul Morford, P. O. Box 6345, Kent, said there SALARY are two issues--budget and ethics. He noted that ethics had been discussed in April 1994 and read a portion of a letter drafted by White during his campaign noting that he had led the fight to defeat the move to increase the Mayor's salary. Morford expressed appreciation for the Mayor' s comments about not increasing the salary at this time. Morford stated that the previous Mayor had recomended $75, 000, and that the Mayor was to be the CEO and not have an Administrator. He said an ordinance was written to eliminate the Administrator' s position and to create the Operations Director position, which he feels is really the City Administrator, and that Council and staff know the city is being run by a City Administrator and not by the Mayor. Morford said that the salary should be set by the scope of work, and said that the Mayor of Auburn does not have an Administrative Assistant and his total staff is less. He said the entire budget issue should be looked at. He voiced concern about the ethics issue and campaign promises, and recom- mended that the salary set for the remainder of the term be what the Mayor had initiated in opposition to the committee meeting set by the previous Mayor, and that a committee be set up to look at the total staff requirements and scope of work that the Mayor does. He added that next term there may even be an issue as to the manager form of government. Orr spoke in opposition to Johnson' s motion, noting that she was opposed to the increase in 1997 at the Operations Committee meeting. She said she was also opposed to raising the salary to $75, 000 in 1998 , and suggested looking at the entire administration as to costs and duties before setting the Mayor' s salary. She said that at the Operations Committee meeting she had suggested that $60, 000 would be an appropriate salary for the new term and that that salary be adjusted based on the kind of administration at the time. She said she would prefer that this issue go back to committee for further review before a decision is made as to the salary in 1998 . Epperly agreed that this should be looked at again. Johnson reiterated that the Operations Committee originally recommended that the salary be adjusted to $60, 000 in 1997 and to $75 , 000 in 7 November 5, 1996 MAYOR' S 1998 . He said that the Operations Committee SALARY looks at all departments including Administration to determine whether there should be staff reductions, continuation of programs, and so forth. He felt that sending this issue back to committee would delay it, and that staffing levels and the Mayor' s salary are separate issues. He pointed out that there will be two budget reviews before 1998 and said staffing could be changed then. Houser noted that the City Administrator position was eliminated when the Mayor' s position became full time. She felt that the salary issue and staffing are tied together, and said she would be more comfortable if an ordinance raising the salary for the Mayor were brought back. Clark pointed out that the city is not the same as it was when the full time mayor position was created, and that Kent is suddenly the loth largest city in the state which was not antici- pated at the time. He added that the city now has responsibility for a larger area and a larger population, and that more dramatic changes are expected downtown with the opening of the Regional Justice Center. He stated that if this issue is drawn out, it will be under discussion during a mayoral election year. He urged that this issue be handled promptly. Bennett said that he was not able to attend the Operations Committee meeting due to an illness in his family, and therefore did not have the opportunity to discuss this issue. He said he is not opposed to an increase in the Mayor' s salary, but that he is uncomfortable with not having been at the meeting to discuss it and that the only reason it moved forward was because he was not there. Orr said that the city was aware of the annexa- tions for a number of years beforehand, and agreed that setting the salary for the mayor during an election year can be difficult. She explained that when running for Mayor, white suggested a salary of $50, 000 and she agreed. She said the Operations Committee meets at least two more times before the end of the year and that a recommendation can be made for an appropriate salary. She said it may even be possible to look at the administration as a whole 8 November 5, 1996 MAYOR' S by January of next year. She said the salary as SALARY it has been is appropriate, but it should be looked at before setting a figure for 1998 . The motion to adjust the Mayor's salary to $75, 000 effective January 1, 1998 then failed, with Clark and Johnson in favor and Bennett, Epperly, Houser and Orr opposed. Mayor White reminded Councilmembers that this issue came to them because it was one of their priority issues, and that if it is addressed further, it will be at their prerogative. He said that staffing issues are addressed in the budget, that Council has approved the current staffing levels, and that it is their prerogative to adjust those staffing levels at any time. REPORTS Council President. Houser reminded Council- members that the Suburban Cities dinner will be held on November 13 in Tukwila, and asked that they contact Ms. Banister. Operations. Johnson noted that the next meeting will be held at 4 : 30 on November 6th. Public Works. Clark noted that the next meeting will be held at 3 : 30 on November 6th. Planning. Orr noted that the next meeting will be held at 4 : 00 on November 19th. EXECUTIVE Administrative Reports. At 7 : 40 p.m. , McFall SESSION reminded Council of an executive session of approximately twenty minutes to discuss negotiations for property acquisition and matters of litigation. The meeting reconvened at 8 : 25 p.m. PROPERTY HOUSER MOVED to authorize establishment of a ACQUISITION budget of $200, 000 for the purchase and develop- ment of the Cavender Property for museum parking, contingent upon approval by the Hearing Examiner (Parks of the conditional use application to utilize the Department) Keck home as a museum and/or public meeting facility, and subject to final approval of the Real Estate Purchase and Sale Agreement by the City Attorney. Epperly seconded and the motion carried with Bennett opposed. 9 November 5, 1996 PROPERTY BENNETT MOVED that the Mayor be authorized to ACQUISITION sign and enter into a Real Estate Purchase and Sale Agreement with King County Fire Protection District No. 37 for the purchase of Fire Station (Fire No. 75 in the amount of $1, 913 , 578 . 96, and to Department) adjust the Capital Improvement Budget to reflect the $100, 000 down payment payable in 1996 . Johnson seconded and the motion carried. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 8 : 30 p.m. GL cep riL &�re-Zci' a CMC City Cler 10 //1W Kent City Council Meeting Date November 5 . 1996 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: SALT AIR HILLS VISTA PARK MASTER PLAN - APPROVAL AND ADOPTION 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Approval and adoption of the master plan for Salt Air Hills Vista Park, as presented by Colie Hough of Hough, Beck & Baird Landscape Architects, and as approved at the Parks Committee meeting on November 5, 1996. Several years ago the City purchased two acres from a King County Conservation Futures Grant to develop the Salt Air Hills site. Colie Hough-Beck of Hough-Beck & Baird was hired to develop a master plan of the park. Prior to master planning, a citizen advisory committee met twice and a public meeting was held to collect a list of the needs and wants of the community. A group of 30-35 neighbors participated. 3 . EXHIBITS• None 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Staff and Parks Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 3C )W1 Kent City Council Meeting Date November 5 , 1996 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: 1997 CITY ART PLAN BUDGET AND 1997-2001 FIVE YEAR ART PLAN - APPROVAL AND ADOPTION 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: As approved at the Parks Committee meeting on November 5, 1996, and in compliance with the general procedures of the City Art Program (Ordinance No. 2552) , approval and adoption of the annual budget for all City Art Program projects and the Five-Year Art Plan. 3 . EXHIBITS: City Art Program 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Arts Commission, Staff and Parks Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES X 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $203 , 000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: City Art Program, Ordinance No. 2552 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 3D CITY OF KENT PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT KENT ARTS COMMISSION 1997 CITY ART PLAN FIVE YEAR - CITY ART PLAN 5 CITY OF KENT PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT KENT ARTS COMMISSION 1997 CITY ART PLAN PROJECTS Centennial Center Glass Installation 75,000 Japanese-American Community Artwork 50,000 Reclamation Art Project (3) 15,000 Portable Collection Purchases 3,000 Project Contingency (10%) 15.000 Subtotal $158,000 OTHER EXPENSES Administration 29,000 Maintenance, Supplies, 7,000 Insurance 1,200 Design Fee, Honorariums, Prof. Services 6,000 Postage and Printing 1.800 Subtotal 459000 TOTAL $203,000 6 CITY OF KENT PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT KENT ARTS COMMISSION 1997 CITY ART PLAN Project Title: Centennial Center Glass Installation Project Description: A professional artist or team of artists would be hired to conceptualize, design, create and install a glass artwork in the lobby display case and possibly the adjoining ceiling in the recently acquired Centennial Center. The artwork would replace the glass artwork currently on display, which is the property of the previous building owner. Being an installation, the selected artist would have the ability to specifically design a work for the City of Kent, both in the dimensions of the site and possibly thematically. Estimated 1997 Costs: 575,000 Funding Source: City Art Plan Background: The Centennial Center has had quality glass artwork on display in the lobby since it was built. The City has the opportunity to continue this tradition and take advantage of a preexisting custom-built glass display case. The project will also continue the City's collection of important glass artwork, including Dick Weiss' stained glass windows at the Senior Center and Paul Marioni's and Ann Troutner's Glass installation, "Elements" at the Fire Department Head Quarters. Factors Supporting Project: 1. The project will complement the recent purchase of the Centennial Center by the City of Kent. 2. The project will continue and enhance the tradition of glass art in the building 3. The project will take advantage of the existing custom-built display case for glass. 7 CITY OF KENT PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT KENT ARTS COMMISSION 1997 CITY ART PLAN Project Title: Japanese-American Community Artwork Project Description: A professional artist or artist team will be hired to conceptualize, design, create and install an artwork that recognizes and commemorates the rich history and culture of the Japanese-American community of the Kent area. Through a series of meetings with the Japanese-American community and others, it was determined that the artwork should reflect the diverse and rich history of this community, celebrating the many accomplishments and the spirit that survived adversity. It was also agreed upon that the selected artist should interact with the community, that the artwork be an exterior work and that it incorporate the agricultural and gardening history of the community. Estimated 1997 Costs: $50,000 Funding Source: City Art Plan Background: The Commission has had the artwork in the previous two five year plans. The Commission's desire is to utilize art to recognize and commemorate the important role Japanese- Americans have played, and continue to play, in the development of the Kent Valley. The Commission held three community meetings with members of the Japanese-American community and others in the summer of 1996 to help outline the project. The proposed site is the grounds of the recently acquired "Bereiter House". Factors Supporting Project: 1. The Japanese-American community is an important part of the history of the Kent area. 2. Public artwork is an ideal medium to commemorate the Japanese-American community. 3. The artwork continues the Commission's desire to have artwork directly tied to the community. 8 CITY OF KENT PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT KENT ARTS COMMISSION 1997 CITY ART PLAN Project Title: Reclamation Art Project Project Description: Continuation of the successful public art program that has area youth designing and producing artworks with a professional artist. Three projects are planned for 1997. The project sites and overall designs (mural, installation, environmental work, etc.) will be determined by the youth in cooperation with the artist and the Parks Department staff. Estimated 1997 Costs: $15,000 Funding Source: City Art Plan Back}round: The first Reclamation Art Project was completed by students of Kent West High School in the winter of 1994. The students painted the "Dig It" mural on the previously vandalized restroom/maintenance building at West Fenwick Park. Following the success of that project, four more works were completed in 1995 and two more in 1996 throughout the City. The response from the youth and the community has been extremely positive. Factors Supporting Project: 1. The project promotes the City's interest in working with youth. 2. Vandalism declines and money is saved in maintenance. 9 CITY OF KENT PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT KENT ARTS COMMISSION 1997 CITY ART PLAN Project Title: Portable Collection Purchases Protect Description: Purchase high quality artworks from the Kent Canterbury Faire Juried Fine Art Exhibit. The artworks will be exhibited in the public accessible areas of the City of Kent buildings. Estimated 1997 Costs: $3,000 Funding Source: City Art Fund Background: The City of Kent Arts Commission has established a collection of portable artwork that includes paintings, prints and other works. The purchase awards at the Canterbury Faire Fine Art Exhibit bring a higher quality of artwork to the exhibit and allows the City to obtain artwork to enhance the public buildings. Factors Supporting Project: 1. Supports local artists and promotes participation in City programs. 2. Visual artworks enhance public buildings. 3. Artworks in public areas contribute to a successful and positive city image. 10 CITY OF KENT PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT KENT ARTS COMMISSION 1997 - 2001 CITY ART PLAN 1997 PROJECTS COSTS Centennial Center Glass Installation 75,000 Japanese American Community Artwork 50,000 Reclamation Art Project (3) 15,000 Portable Collection Purchases 3,000 Project Contingency (10%) 15,000 Administration/Maintenance 45,000 Approximate Year Total $203,000 1998 PROJECTS COSTS Public Participation Artwork 30,000 Downtown Mural 25,000 Reclamation Art Project (3) 15,000 Portable Collection Purchases 3,000 Administration/Maintenance 50,000 Approximate Year Total $123,000 1999 PROJECTS COSTS Reclamation Art Project 15,000 Performing Art Center planning 10,000 Downtown Mural 25,000 Portable Collection Purchases 4,000 Administration/Maintenance 50.000 Approximate Year Total $104,000 11 CITY OF KENT PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT KENT ARTS COMMISSION 1997 - 2001 CITY ART PLAN 2000 PROJECTS COSTS Reclamation Art Projects 12,000 Performing Art Center Artwork 70,000 Portable Collection Purchases 4,000 Administration/Maintenance 55.000 Approximate Year Total $141,000 2001 PROJECTS COSTS Reclamation Art Project 8,000 Performing Art Center Artwork 70,000 Portable Collection Purchases 4,000 Administration/Maintenance 55.000 Approximate Year Total S 137,000 12 Kent City Council Meeting Date November 5 . 1996 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: LID UNDERWRITER CONTRACT AND AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED WITH LID 345 BOND SALE 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Authorization for the Mayor to sign a three-year underwriter contract, with two one-year extensions, with Dain Bosworth Inc. , and authorization to proceed with Dain Bosworth Inc. 's sale of approximately $781, 625 in LID bonds for LID 345. 3 . EXHIBITS: Memo from May Miller to Operations Committee 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Operations Committee (3-0) (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION• ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 3E Memo Date: October 31, 1996 To: Operations Committee From: May Miller, Director of Finance Subject: LID Underwriting Contract - LID 345 Bond Sale The City of Kent began an LID underwriter selection process in October 1996. Proposal letters were sent to area underwriters who had expressed interest in becoming the City's LID underwriter. Six companies submitted proposals per the attached criteria letter. All companies presented excellent proposals which made the selection process very difficult. After several independent and joint reviews, Dain Bosworth Inc. of Seattle is recommended as the preferred underwriter which most closely matched the LID underwriter needs of the City. Seafirst was selected as the second preferred company. Both companies submitted aggressive pricing which was one component of the selection; however, Dain Bosworth, based on the information submitted, was unanimously recommended as having the best marketing plan, experience selling similar LIDS, and the best creative solutions in different situations. They also showed commitment and interest in their follow-through questions and requested information on LID 345. The Committee would like to recommend selection of Dain Bosworth Inc. as the City's underwriter and authorize the Mayor to sign a contract for three years with two one-year optional extensions. The City, however, will reserve the right to hire more than one managing underwriter and/or sales agent. In this case, the City would recommend using Seafirst as the preferred additional agency. In addition, we request authorization to proceed with Dain Bosworth to sell approximately $781,625 in LID bonds for LID 345. This LID is for street improvements and for water and sewer stub extension to unserviced property. The 30-day prepayment period has passed and we are ready to proceed. We have attached the proposed bond sale schedule. COUNCIL ACTION: Authorize the Mayor to sign a three-year underwriter contract, with two one-year extensions, with Dain Bosworth Inc. Also, authorize proceeding with Dain Bosworth Inc.'s sale of approximately $781,625 in LID bonds for LID 345. /��/y Kent City Council Meeting Date November 5 . 1996 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: CENTENNIAL CENTER LEASE POLICY - RESOLUTION 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Adoption of Resolution No. setting out policy regarding authority to enter into leases with tenants at the Centennial Center. 3 . EXHIBITS: Memo to Operations Committee and proposed resolution 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Operations Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION• Council Agenda Item No. 3F MEMORANDUM TO: COUNCIL OPERATIONS COMMITTEE FROM: BRENT MCFALL /�a/ SUBJECT: CENTENNIAL CENTER LEASING RESOLUTION DATE: October 31, 1996 The attached Resolution sets out policy regarding authority to enter into leases with tenants at the Centennial Center. Under the proposed policy, administration would have authority to enter into leases that do no exceed ten years in length including all options to renew. In addition, all leases would be required to be at market rates and in substantially the same terms and conditions as in existing leases. Any lease that did not conform to this policy (which we do not foresee happening) would require Council approval. RECOMMENDATION Operations Committee move to recommend to Council adoption of the Resolution establishing a policy for leasing of vacant space at the Centennial Center to private tenants. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, establishing a policy for leasing vacant space at the Centennial Center to private tenants. WHEREAS, July 1, 1996, the City acquired the Centennial Center facility adjacent to City Hall; and WHEREAS, in acquiring this facility it was the City Council's intent to operate the facility for use by private tenants as well as for City offices; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to authorize the administration to negotiate and enter into leases for private tenants at the Centennial Building under certain guidelines so as to allow for the efficient management of the facility for the benefit of private tenants; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: City Administration is authorized to negotiate and enter into leases with private tenants for vacant space at the Centennial Center. The terms of such leases are not to exceed ten years, including all options to renew. All 1 such lease agreements shall be for market rates and for substantially the same terms and conditions as set forth in the existing leases for private tenants of the facility. SECTION 2: Any lease exceeding ten years or for consideration other than fair market value for the lease or for terms substantially different than those set forth in the existing leases for private tenants of the facility shall require prior Council approval. Passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington this day of , 1996. Concurred in by the Mayor of the City of Kent, this day of 1996 JIM WHITE, MAYOR ATTEST: BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: ROGER A. LUBOVICH, CITY ATTORNEY I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of Resolution No. passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, the day of 1996. (S EA L) BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK CENTLEA.res 3 Kent City Council Meeting Date November 5 , 1996 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: 1997 TAX LEVY - ORDINANCE 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Adoption of Ordinance No. establishing the tax levy for 1997 . At their November 6, 1996 meeting, the Operations Committee recommended adoption of the ordinance establishing the tax levy for 1997 in the amount of $14,489, 025 for the general fund and $1, 850, 707 for the debt service fund. 3 . EXHIBITS: Memo from May Miller and ordinance 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Operations Committee (3-0) (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION• ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 3G Demo Date: November 14, 1996 To: Council From: May Miller, Director of Finance Subject: 1997 TAX LEVY As recommended by the Operations Committee at their November 6 meeting, authorization is requested to adopt the ordinance establishing the tax levy for 1997 the amount of$14,489,025 for the general fund and $1,850,707 for the debt service fund. These amounts are tentative as we have not received the final assessed valuation from King County. If the amounts change we will make an amendment at the December 10 Council Meeting. I i' i i i ORDINANCE NO. i AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, establishing the tax levy for 1997. i WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 84.52.070, the City of Kent must, on or before the thirtieth day of November in each year, certify to the county assessor the amount of taxes levied upon property within the City for City purposes, provided that the county assessor has certified assessed values at least twelve working days before November 30; and i WHEREAS, the County has not. at this time, certified assessed values as required I by RCW 84.48.130 and is not expected to provide its certification prior to November 30, 1996, and WHEREAS, the City is relieved from its statutory obligation to provide its property tax certification if the County fails to meet its deadline; and WHEREAS, the Citv nevertheless desires to establish and certify the amount of taxes levied upon property within the City for City purposes while reserving its right to adjust that certification at the first regularly scheduled council meeting held after receiving the certified assessed values from the County; and Tax Levy i I i I i I WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 84.52.010 and WAC 458-12-365, taxes shall be i levied in specific dollar amounts; NOW, THEREFORE. j THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: i Section 1. Recitals Incorporated. The foregoing recitals are incorporated as if fully set forth herein. Section 2. Lew. There is hereby levied against the property in the City of Kent, �i Washington, an assessed value for the City's 1997 municipal tax in the following amounts for the following funds: A. For the General Fund, for the purpose of paying the general expenses of municipal government: Levy per 51,000 of assessed valuation Fund (estimated) Amount General Fund 2.84008 $14,489,025.00 B. For Voted Bond Interest and Redemption Fund, for the purpose of paying debt service in the following amounts for the following funds: Levy per 51,000 of assessed valuation Fund (estimated) Amount i Senior Housinu 06358 5349,900.00 General Obligation Refunding 29418 $1,500,807.00 Tax Levy i I i 1 I I I� Section 3. Limitation on Lew. The application of the general fund levy shall be i consistent with and not result in a tax revenue in excess of the limitation imposed by RCW 84.55.010. i Section 4. Reservation of Rights. Pursuant to RCW 84.52.105, the City reserves its right to adjust its certified property tax assessment at its next regularly scheduled council meeting following receipt of the County's certified assessed values. 1 Section 5. Aduustments. Administration shall administer the Annual Budget and in doing so may authorize adjustments pursuant to RCW 35A.33.120. i 'I Section 6. Severability. If any section. sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, i such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance. i Section 7. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force five (5) days from and after the date of publication of this ordinance. JINI WHITE. vIAYOR ATTEST: i BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK 3 lax Levy i APPROVED AS TO FORM: ROGER A. LUBOVICH, CITY ATTORNEY PASSED day of 1996 APPROVED day of , 1996. PUBLISHED day of , 1996. I herebv certifv that this is a true copy of Ordinance No. passed by the Citv Council of the Citv of Kent, Washinaton, and approved by the Mayor of the City of Kent as hereon indicated. (SEAL) BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK Tax Levy Kent City Council Meeting Date November 5 . 1996 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: PARKING CODE AMENDMENT - ORDINANCE 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works Committee, adoption of Ordinance No. amending Chapter 9 . 38 of the Kent City Code relating to no parking zones, establishing new two-hour and thirty-minute parking zones and further authorizing the City's Facilities Manager to issue parking permits. 3 . EXHIBITS: Public Works Committee minutes, Public Works Director memorandum and parking ordinance 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 3H we have been more successful with LIDs in the industrial, commercial and multi-family properties. In the past 27 years we have never formed a street improvement for a residential area. They are not palatable with the residents and thev are not successful when brought before Council. Lately we have required more up front improvements rather than the LID covenants. Jon Johnson stated that he has always been favorable towards the up front street improvements because it solves problems at the time of the plat, basically not having to retrofit something later on. With regard to arterials, Wicicstrom noted when we don't know how the alignment will fit and when we try to match piece-meal improvements, sometimes we have to design it to fit what's existing and in the long run it will change. When we look at all the roads we have built, most of those arterials are in now and have been built with the support of LIDs. Our trend is towards hard improvements up front. Wickstrom suggested that a formal form of policy from Council be given to direct us to require up front improvements. Brubaker stated that he will draft a Resolution for review and approval at the next Committee meeting. Permit Parking Ordinance Amendment Brubaker stated that the purpose of this Ordinance is to transfer authority to issue parking permits in the Centennial Center and Citv Hall from the Transportation Engineer to the Facilities Manager. During the discussion of this ordinance at the last Committee uneeting, Leona Orr pointed out that this draft Ordinance established a 30 minute parking limit for the parking area between the Centennial Center and City Hall, Which she found to be unacceptable. Brubaker stated there is no reason to continue With this 30 minute limit and it will be stricken from the Ordinance. Committee unanimously recommended approving the draft ordinance with the amendment of striking Section 9.38.OSO Sub-Section S from the Ordinance. Code Revision Brubaker said there is a Public Works provision in the Citv Code which states that Public Worlcs projects shall comply with the 198S version of the Washington State Dept of Transportation Standards Specifications for Roads, Bridges and Highways. This section should reference the latest version. Committee unanimously recommended that the Citv Attorrtev amend Section 6.02.010 of the Citv Code to incorporate the latest revision of the Wa State Specifications. Added items: Saar Street Vacation Wicicstrom asked for Committee's concurrence that when the money for this street vacation is received, that it be deposited into the School Pedestrian Walkways fund. Committee unanimously concurred. S 218th Street Landscaping (LID 345) Mrs. Rust of 8619 S. 218th St. asked who was responsible for landscaping now that the S. 218th Street improvements are complete. Wicicstrom said the Planning Dept requires property owners to landscape their property to the edge of the pavement. He said when we build a road, often times we require additional right of way from the property owner. When we remove the landscaping, it has been the practice that those properties become nonconforming with respect to their landscaping and thev are not required to restore it. Meeting adjourned: 4:20 p.m. DEPARTNIENT OF PUBLIC WORKS October I6, 1996 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Don Wickstrom C�_u RE: Permit Parking Ordinance By City Ordinance two hour parking zone permits are issued by the Traffic Engineer in the Public Works Dept, for City officials to conduct business within the City. Since the recent purchase of the Centennial Center Building by the Citv, these parking permits are now issued by the Facilities Manager. As such, we are requesting authorization to direct the Citv Attornev to amend Section 9.38. 1 70 of the existing Parking Ordinance to reflect same. ACTION: Authorization to direct the Citv Attornev to amend Section 9.38. 170 of the existing Parking Ordinance to reflect parking permits issued by the Citv's Facilities Manager. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, amending Chapter 9.38 of the Kent City Code relating to no parking zones within the City establishing new two-hour and thirty-minute parking zones and further authorizing the Citv's Facilities Manager to issue parking permits. WHEREAS, the City Council has established no parking zones within the City of Kent as authorized by state law; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to amend the City Code to update its no parking zones; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Section 9.38.060 of the Kent City Code is hereby amended to read as follows: See. 9.38.060. Two-hour parking zones. ULifiLr ., b y JWILU MU lUV. the attendancu of I A$. Except for sect ion 9.38.070 and permits issued by the trnf it-mTm, ' city facilities manager under section 9.38. 170, at such times as the director of public works or designee shall place the appropriate sign, it shall be illegal to park any motor or other vehicle for an uninterrupted period in excess of two (2) hours between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on either side of unless otherwise indicated, the following streets. public parking lots public parking aara;es or portions thereof. 1. Harrison Street (Fourth Avenue to Second Avenue). 2. Meeker Street (Fourth Avenue to State Avenue). 3. Gowe Street (Fourth Avenue to Central Avenue). 4. Titus Street (Second Avenue to First Avenue). 5. First Avenue (from a point two hundred (200) feet north of Meeker Street to Titus Street). 6. Second Avenue (Smith Street to Titus Street). 7. Railroad Avenue (Smith Street to Meeker Street, east side only). S. State Avenue (Smith Street to Meeker Street). 9. Centennial Parking Garage: that portion of the first floor as posted. 10. City Hall harking lot (between City Hail and the Centennial Buildins)� All parkins stalls unless otherwise posted. Provided that this section shall not apply on Sundays or holidays. .SECTION 2. Section 9.38.080 of the Kent City Code is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 9.38.080. Thirty-minute parking zones. At such times as the traffic engineer shall place the appropriate sign, it shall be illegal to park any motor or other vehicle for an uninterrupted period in excess of thirty (30) minutes rnt eidlUl side o-f, unless otherwise indicated, at the following locations: I i t. First Avenue: The first stall north of Meeker Street on the west side of First Avenue. 2. First Avenue: The first stall south of Meeker Street on the West Side of First Avenue. 3. Second Avenue: The first stall south of Meeker Street on the east side of Second Avenue. 4. Second Avenue: The first stall south of Meeker Street on the west side of Second Avenue. 5 Gowe Street: The first stall east of Railroad Avenue on Gowe Street, north side. 6. Fourth Avenue: The first stall north of Titus Street on the east side of Fourth Avenue. 7. Centennial Building The first four stalls on the east side of the buildime as posted. SECTION 3. Section 9.38.160 of the Kent City Code is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 9.38.160. Municipal parking facilities regulated, penalty. A. Parking shall be permitted at municipal parking facilities only in designated parkin) areas, in the manner provided by law, and as limited in time or otherwise restricted by official signs, including parking permits issued by the t�ineet city facilities manager pursuant to section 9.38.170, B. Municipal parking facilities for the purposes of this section mean any public parking area serving a municipal facility. Such facilities include, but are not limited to, the city commons, city Yolf facility, city senior center, all parks or recreation facilities owned or operated by the city, city shops, city hall, the Centennial Parking Garage and adjacent parkins areas_the corrections facility and those public lots between Smith and Harrison Streets and Second Avenue and Fourth Avenue, Gowe and Titus Streets and Second Avenue and Third Avenue, and the Southeast corner of Second Avenue and Titus Street. 3 C. Any violation of this section shall be an infraction and punishable by a monetary penalty of twenty-five dollars ($25.00). Vehicles in violation are subject to impoundment as provided by law. SECTION 4. Section 9.38.170 of the Kent City Code is hereby amended to read as follows: See. 9.38.170. Parking permits. A. The citv_council finds that it is necessary to have a system of special parking permits to be administered by the city facilities manager which authorizes council members and the mavor to utilize existing two-hour parking zones and fifteen-minute parking zones at or near the city hall and other city facilities durin}regular business hours between 9-00 a.m. until 6 00 p.m. necessary for the attendance of such officials at meetings and official business with the city. The city traffic rugirreerfacilities manager is authorized to issue parkins permits for city council members and the mayor on forms, cards or stickers as he or she determines to be appropriate and conspicuous. Such permits shall contain a rendition of the city's corporate seal or official logo identifying the holder thereof as an authorized user and member of the city council or the mayor and to be exempt from parking restrictions under this chapter, excluding disabled parking stalls. Such permits authorize unlimited parking for official business at two-hour parking zones provided under section 9.38.060 for Meeker Street and Gowe Street, and for all municipal parkin, facilities identified under section 9.38.160. Any permits issued by the tiaffic enginerrfacilities manager under this section shall be signed by the facilities manager and issued for such periods as he or she deemsdmued appropriate . B. The city tta rfacilities manager is authorized to issue parking permits for city corrections facility employees, Aukeen District Court employees, King County probation office ' employees and prosecutors whose municipalities use Aukeen District Court on forms, cards or stickers as he or she thu tiaffic cimrucur determines to be appropriate and conspicuous. Marked police vehicles and other police vehicles displaying exempt license plates may use the parkins, lot without being issued a permit. Such permits authorize unlimited parking for city or district court business at the lot southeast of the corrections facility at 1230 South Central Street. The parking lot shall be for the exclusive use of individuals with these parkin, permits except for any legally desiunated handicapped parking. The permits shall be signed by the traftc-ern-ineerfacilities manager and issued for such periods as he or she deems deemed appropriate�� er�irreer. 4 �I SECTION 5. If any one or more sections, sub-sections, or sentences of this Ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION h. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law. JINI WHITE, NIAYOR ATTEST: i BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: ROGER A. LUBOVICH, CITY ATTORNEY PASSED day of 1996. APPROVED day of , 1996. PUBLISHED day of 1996. I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No. passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the City of Kent as hereon indicated. (SEAL) BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK P'AGRDINANp.PKGCHN.ORD C Kent City Council Meeting Date November 5 . 1996 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS CODE AMENDMENT - ORDINANCE 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works Committee, adoption of Ordinance No. revising Sections 6 . 02 . 010 and 6. 02 . 020 of the Kent City Code to incorporate the latest revision of the Washington State Specifications for Public Works projects. 3 . EXHIBITS: Public Works Committee minutes and Public Works Director memorandum 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 3I we have been more successful with LIDS in the industrial, commercial and multi-family properties. In the past 27 years we have never formed a street improvement for a residential area. They are not palatable with the residents and they are not successful when brought before Council. Latelv we have required more up front improvements rather than the LID covenants. Jon Johnson stated that he has always been favorable towards the up front street improvements because it solves problems at the time of the plat, basically not having to retrofit something later on. With regard to arterials, Wickstrom noted when we don't know how the alignment will fit and when we try to match piece-meal improvements, sometimes we have to design it to fit what's existing and in the long run it will change. When we look at all the roads the have built, most of those arterials are in now and have been built with the support of LIDS. Our trend is towards hard improvements up front. Wicicstrom suggested that a formal form of policy from Council be given to direct us to require up front improvements. Brubaker stated that he %vill draft a Resolution for review and approval at the next Committee meeting. Permit Parking Ordinance Amendment Brubaker stated that the purpose of this Ordinance is to transfer authority to issue parking permits in the Centennial Center and City Hall from the Transportation Engineer to the Facilities Manager. During the discussion of this ordinance at the last Committee meeting, Leona Orr pointed out that this draft Ordinance established a 30 minute parking limit for the parking area between the Centennial Center and City Hall, which she found to be unacceptable. Brubaker stated there is no reason to continue Vvith this 30 minute limit and it will be stricken from the Ordinance. Committee unanimously recommended approving the draft ordinance with the amendment of striking Section 9.38.080 Sub-Section S from the Ordinance. Code Revision V Brubaker said there is a Public Works provision in the City Code which states that Public Works projects shall comply with the 198S version of the Washington State Dept of Transportation Standards Specifications for Roads, Bridges and Highways. This section should reference the latest version. Committee unanimouslv recommended that the Citv Attornev amend Section 6.02.010 of the Citv Code to incorporate the latest revision of the Wa State Specifications. Added items: Saar Street Vacation Wicicstrom asked for Committee's concurrence that when the money for this street vacation is received, that it be deposited into the School Pedestrian Walkways fund. Committee unanimously concurred. S 218th Street Landscaping (LID 345) Mrs. Rust of 8619 S. 218th St. asked who was responsible for landscaping now that the S. 2 l Sth Street improvements are complete. Wicicstrom said the Planning Dept requires property owners to landscape their property to the edge of the pavement. He said when we build a road, often times we require additional right of way from the property owner. When we remove the landscaping, it has been the practice that those properties become nonconforming with respect to their landscaping and they are not required to restore it. Meeting adjourned: 4:20 p.m. 3 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS November 6, 1996 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Don Wickstrom RE: Code Revision Section 6.02.010 of the rent City Code needs to be revised to incorporate the latest revision of the Wa. State Specifications. This is simply a "housekeeping" item and we are requesting that Council direct the City Attomey to revise same. ACTION: Recommend Council direct the City Attorney to revise Section 6.02.010 of the Kent Citv Code to incorporate the latest revision of the Wa. State Specifications. i ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City of Kent. Washington, amending Sections 6.02.010 and 6.02.020 of the Kent City Code relating to the adoption and application of"Standard Specifications for Road. Bridge and Municipal Construction," as published by the Washington State Department of Transportation and the American Public Works Association, to all Public Improvement Contracts. i THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Section 6.02.010 of the Kent City Code is amended as follows: Sec. 6.02.010. Standard specifications adopted. The latest edition of the Standard Specifications for Road. Bridge and Municipal Construction. '9O°T7D8 EtiZtiot z as published by the Washington State Department of Transportation and the American Public Works Association. is hereby adopted by reference. One (1) copy of these standards is on file in the city clerk's office. I i 1 i i SECTION 2. Section 6.02.020 of the Kent City Code is amended as follows: See. 6.02.020. Intention. It is intended ift-&doptittg that the standards adopted in section 6.02.010 tie prt)visiotts 4tereiti shall cotref become the basesi2ecitications subject to amendment by the City on individual projects, for the construction of city public works including streets allevs, other public right-of-ways, sewers systems, water distribution systems. storm drainage systems,and all other t3 z facilities SECTION 3. The provisions of this ordinance are declared to be separate and severable. The invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section or portion of this ordinance. or the invalidity of the application thereof to any person or circumstances shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this ordinance. or the validity of its application to other persons or circumstances. SECTION 4. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days from the time of its final approval and passage as provided by law. JIM WHITE, MAYOR ATTEST: BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: ROGER A. LUBOVICH. CITY ATTORNEY 2 I i PASSED the day of , 19_. APPROVED the _ day of 19_. PUBLISHED the _day of 19_. I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of Ordinance No. passed by the City Council of the City of Kent. Washington. and approved by the Mayor of the City of Kent hereon indicated. BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK STANSPEC.ord I 3 I �R/f Kent City Council Meeting Date November 5, 1996 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: MERIDIAN ASPHALT OVERLAYS - ACCEPT AS COMPLETE 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works Director, accept as complete the Meridian Asphalt Overlay contract with Lakeside Industries and release of retainage after State releases. The original contract amount was $197 , 727 . The final construction cost was $179 , 087 . 99 . 3 . EXHIBITS: Vicinity map 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Director (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 3J I t � r aeL .N.L ce4; Y� I �u 9C .V ST w to _ SE 248 5T I T sF zue PL d SE 249 111 ti /•Nf rfN w ^1 \ SE a !n r LL(N(/1111/11 n] 'V9 a'tV S0 SE 251 5 T '- _ u+ YHi PL N ec2sis 1„ ,c ¢ S1152' mW Zg2 > Pfv. - cF P,SE 252 PL e4 � ¢ 252 PL SE 252 ''-T j w m ..:SF =253 5tv C1w, `n _ ¢ sF 253 -o_ SE `SE 253 awJilw _ -_ �n �Ivn PL vwi m sr 1 m �� cy �t > N' rE a wm w S 1>¢ > > SE 254 PL -ISE 5 zsu 5j No N ST �.,56t SS r � •�•\ N SE 254�� rev � N ¢ ��\ ^y5 _�P�.ui to SE 255 6 I! > 0 m _ m PL' rn c 7 PL - PLl 2t 256 PL Pu SE 256 f * 57 -- SE 258 ST N of \ Pan.: r nroF � �� m SE 2P6N > SE 256 PL ❑ F,•P: _ 'SI _ 1 _ iE 257 rT > _EEv w sra. n SE 257 P_ �. S 2a8 T SE 258 `� SE 258 T SF 2S ¢ a�ur m Fas rnt_'. an. w -t a }} t N NNi ES 554 5T �' SE 258 CT PC m y Jp iw cS[ eCZ PL1vi m1 - ,t `° SF SE 259�51 (� 15E PL9 `60 1 i �I S.I 259 5_ 8S9 p =t �I < cE 259 PL N _ FVFN z SE 2E] PL SEx \Y,,, �v� rn _ E 250 ST 259 PL (� m Ln SE j250 ST oar: 0 "0 ``� $E 251 cT _�> Ji J 251 'T 'U y Pnnn ---'� ry. t , SE 26I ST \\ 26l P_ t .I �� SE W fin{ r SE,'. 262 PL r .. ,�9 t'• o ��> ciw c'N ml� t 263 Si SF `^D C[. 1p, PL E 264 F L fO Si54 x�%Y SE 264 5� N/ai �sE z6u}D _' SE ' 64 $p SE 263 I��S - t �r'r a m 5T S'A 54 zfis P ^I .` NC i L w w4 I SE 2fi ST ^'" SF 3� =Y' aL 255se26s�cT; I BY�d Ir,t '..� - ,p�1�/ae, w Cp 266 aST f �_ c ¢ C 263 5" H! 256 3- 'Is- ' i 6 vI�-PL t 5 258 ST ' ~\ �F t t 'J _ ¢ ¢ Sc P2�SE ST _ _ N li SE 270 ST SE J70 Si f��Si cE 272 PL 'E= 272 5T �I _ SE 272 ST _ 1a 1= _ W iv>1 Ej.,2 5m SEE 2SE 27u 5T > `E 2' P �� u7 T'� C01 m SE 275'Si - SE 274 Sl nI y •i IT pie \�. c_ i?.1 S� 2 �,•.. > \sue _t -1 ��c, ZF /•. Hf i �y P „'S 5 70 l.-, \tii ^�J SE 276 I $TI 5E� �"� [-� 5E 275 P d• PL :E 27., ]t > < _ S- _5 n PL _ e 5E c lis rP:. 27g >t - 5 276 a� e,6 ST ST �m � �A a ^50 a m� n arc:nN naPn SE 276 ' � r^ 5E SE C' S` � :N ¢'� �`r ems•„ 277 PL a• 5E 2)7 PL I'^ IS c- 5�278 0 ;76 I ST :.vF ra[F s a E 276 PL O 2P9 ` V c P P4PPee o SE" 280 ST 4PRIv. > PFi1V. PROJECT LOCATION ' N I ¢mI SE 282 �SEc� d �S' _SE 252 5 5T _______� ` u _ SE 252 9 T^ ti _ _ m�� 233 Si - - _-' _- PRI V. c 282 LE 32 ST PR;V. 294 5T 2 284 ST SE 283 77 Q° 284 ST C Pi1I SE 2E5 Pi �o ST SE 1286 ST N Vl Vl� K MERIDIAN ASPHALT OVERLAY 1996 Kent City Council Meeting Date November 5, 1996 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: GREEN RIVER COURT APARTMENTS - BILL OF SALE 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works Director, acceptance of the bill of sale for the Green River Court Apartments submitted by Green River Court Apartments Limited Partnership for continuous operation and maintenance of 92 feet of water main improvements, 301 feet of sanitary sewer and 195 feet of storm sewer improvements and release of bonds after the expiration period. This project is located at 1401 West Meeker Street. 3 . EXHIBITS: Vicinity map 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Director (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION- ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 3K s <<I i F :.T m .. >� G z2� FL � - ru�— �t rI a J� m S 229 ST 5 '28 ST ti LANCINGcl- ¢ ,L N J " C NOVRC LN m \ Nff:r-J':FIfY d flfr ^ _I 5 234 Si zz 5 233 u, W 5 f 1 c 236 ST W C L_I trENT.., ¢—T i NENORIRL \ / P \ ConnaNs ry PORK e. ie` w CLOUOT 5T BOULOAnCN AT a•R so > s ri PL R7FIE50 ¢ ply [<[ �s / 5 236 ST F C1 CU9T <ci Z Ip > P Et /• P / Z ZI zl o ¢� O 5 233 PL E OE]AOE � 1 JA14ES ST xntxrc YFP�£ wry v+c � I i�-'� IS 240 STI s z]B PL SRM 5T >� >�L/SJEL P,OrVO' < �_ ) I ^I FfYf =pRA CT J CI ¢1 � LOCATION - Ix L. Lax : E9PE RNCE 5T s' a x SMITH 57 LITH ST l �o i wl ti cMiTH cT _� 5 :LLL c; o e PR �,Rc!Nt rexF- h J M RRI°ONIs of UPLPo - It. c HR9RISO1 c �ffllter-- cR5 .1 ST O Rf LO F riE Bi EIT 246 ST) �` a :SE9 aR£��wcf w A Erar' WE'Sli G�WE ST ¢ WEILRNO 5, TBCOMR SiZ) t MILL�n � �j r- OE9�i SST (FILL S1 � � �' =;11RCL 7N 5—T,�. 6 SR 516 GUIBERSON ST ' E SEai iLE ST �•3 ��--^--c- A'PRN( I I�r .VJ 'l V -I � i - E SE aT'LE ST� -1 �v E-CHIC;GO 3 ' ¢ CLEAR v lEN II It - c cf lEac LRUREL 5T at '4 HEMLOCK 5T ;� F ' J CFAiEfiTi i'L iEPI FILBERT ` ¢ W naAiOn s, P NaxtON „J SZ i i � W�LNu1 s1 257 ., �6* InRRLE � fesrfn � H/LLG'f5T PFRrc _ _ (ENfifN/ 2`C 5 T I connfnrJ`9 ' �c £n4tfrr 5 262 5T 5 262 ST �r - 262 - ppd /di S P -- 5T :`gE I r k I NORTH \ _ !',' rnrr" 5 263 57 ti GREEN RIVER COURT APARTMENTS ?f Kent City Council Meeting Date November 5 , 1996 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: PARK COURT APARTMENTS - BILL OF SALE 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works Director, acceptance of the bill of sale for the Park Court Apartments submitted by Park Court Apartments Limited Partnership for continuous operation and maintenance of 192 feet of water main and 155 feet of storm sewer improvements and release of bonds after the expiration period. This project is located at 24510 64th Avenue South. 3 . EXHIBITS: vicinity map 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Director (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION• ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 3L K ONOV--C jon > S 228 ST5 229 ST LANDINGEEG r-a'esaN5 234 Si 5233236 STyW C�L . — GP W CL000T ST L.. Q 23IILORON XT r. S� > 5 Z]] RLAr,�reco '<< 5 c"'6 cr CLOU T Z a > r1 Fr ♦ RL L E GEORGE a �Ic > _ 5 236 PL ui { wi5T '-. JAMES ST m cl > XP(XlFNF4 E..MO^5 I _ � s 24o ST� - f K9rr c2,N v5*z ¢i Ic dOPBEv u I C ¢ RUSSEL P090,- SAM 57 f ar �t c_ +<T fie—, �9HN f ?t✓'E T I - R:GRE-fl $T J CI Iry ¢I I r'> PRRP � En > '_yPE RNCE Si �I > SMITH ST z �¢ sb(ITH ST �� u'I + i `� mj o I( y, Mtn F IST i� 5 _NyLLN N RP[SONIx� FFJ. : N R9:50q cT kS 246 ST �T F�` MEc'(E9 a n__ ,� El" - T9Fy i rl C �� y% I 1 �ti4 G�WE`SiT E G0r✓E T �t KR'I' aEiLANO 57 R -vBEG Y I LOCATION I¢ �.a + ram- GNERR. s z ti z zJi -. I �j .� DEAN i zl HILL MIL£ Eh\ y ` �'\ f Ic N+ -' ��+^\^� '- _' ^1ACLl"N \ Vjs R 516 ( 5 9 s, SLJI8E950N ST w ^ SE0'iLE Si E SERT iLE 57) y E �(a W; XIXPNIS PPPK m�bf .A'Y� ¢� �n "'� • �� I > �> Yi i ' E=CHIIH60 5T ILL CLEFAv IEX.;c zl I�-' ,. LAUREL ST LL � !� l: I iHE^1L0CK ST i CFRIE.j�—I-aRic5 FILBERT It Wa t W `Nul '57 IMF?LE ,� fey/L5 j HfLG Cf<$i eaRK " I 2E9 5 crsrnrr � 7 CJJX f 5 r 5 252 =T _ 4 I '.7 A`•� I > N L .. S. I NORTH >_ 5 26,5 5T — ,'.Y PARK COURT APARTMENTS Kent City Council Meeting Date November 5 . 1996 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: 98TH AVENUE TREATMENT POND - ACCEPT AS COMPLETE 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works Director, accept as complete the 98th Avenue Regional Treatment/Detention Pond contract with Scoccolo Construction and release of retainage after State releases. The original contract amount was $1, 487, 750. 27 . The final construction cost was $1, 502 , 435. 29 . 3 . EXHIBITS: vicinity map 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Director (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 3M x SE 1 8T S = S 218TH T ST S 2 N ST / < „ o � ST I� • i � x SE i(!1)S AL �.� �.� \ 220TH AREA W a-- ST > : o ,WI o p 3E 222ND 4T a - 222ND ST 3 222HO ST W `� \ y1 = m < ~ n W v 12 7 " 7 BE 224TH ST .. < w0 13 18 \ 18 �,. SE 2 > x oar F r s SE2 s NORT « + KEN < x v • x MNTC 6 ^, �.. 226TH i s 2 $ ST a 228TH P 2�127T11 ST g " x e ST SE 22BTH PL 22STH ST< PROJECT LOCATION W 22 ?),PL \. x < i TWO (Pw " SE 231 ,MCP S 2313T SE 231ST ST ST >'W 3T 230THWAV S 232ND I' ` ST 2ND 232ND fT, ? ST "..`• SE 232ND ' " g 94TH C7 S L a dA s( 233 I�7P,f�[y'.pr1 +� `I x W Y 1 �. • W Sir S 236TH l h h\I i s (ht) < ST V1�.\lulu.\I.�� - I.\Ifh V Z W x" fE 231 - 4'' i��'�i[ LDRON V �. < ~ SE 237TI WAY ,<<ET s.237TN F� F. N,1 1. L , W N r;l " (Prt) E O ` n S 238TM. _. `r W x SE 239TH \ © > f » WST < < < = a eo�icrE g o a ST POST 1 F > 33 p S.2 � Z N W OFFICE z ` a a 240 ST .18 17 g > SE KiNT W 4 ! • > Ped O.I",1 SCHOOL 4 E 3 241ST ST r A EAST MILL ELEMENTARY �Athlehc FW ST SCHOOLs ; 242ND� z z ST " I M ILLA E M RA E ST r S 243RD 3M4` aT = Y ; - ST ' ,sa iKEI KENT SMITH ST = S 44T • " SE ♦ p. R 7r CTR •11•�.1 1..(..' > r " Iw A, J1 :{"..... < W I:XER= STT n b� O .'.:�• i•v Y ST > �1 f ST. > _ s( < aT per~_ �4' 01 SCHOOL " i r WEILAND x 1 TACOMA ST k'�t ,9�Y 1 ST 247TH Q < CH RRY Ol •�. CV �l Oq ST x E DEAN HILL ST . - �� 3T .r< << �t `.'' ' ti, s_ I 98TH AVE REGIONAL TREATMENT POND )XIS Kent City Council Meeting Date November 5 , 1996_ Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: SAAR STREET VACATION FUND STV-96-4 - DEPOSIT AUTHORIZATION 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works Committee, authorization for staff to receipt funds from the Saar St. Street Vacation into the School Pedestrian Walkway Fund (R36) to address school pedestrian facilities issues. 3 . EXHIBITS: Public Works Committee minutes 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 3N Added items: Saar Street Vacation Wicicstrom asked for Committee's concurrence that when the money for this street vacation is received, that it be deposited into the School Pedestrian Walkways fund. Committee unanimously concurred. S 218th Street Landscaping (LID 345) Mrs. Rust of 8619 S. 218th St. asked who was responsible for landscaping now that the S. 218th Street improvements are complete. Wicicstrom said the Planning Dept requires property owners to landscape their property to the edge of the pavement. He said when we build a road, often times we require additional right of way from the propertv owner. When we remove the landscaping, it has been the practice that those properties become nonconforming with respect to their landscaping and they are not required to restore it. Meeting adjourned: 4:20 p.m. 3 we have been more successful with LIDS in the industrial, commercial and multi-family properties. In the past 27 years we have never formed a street improvement for a residential area. They are not palatable with the residents and they are not successful when brought before Council. Lately we have required more up front improvements rather than the LID covenants. Jon Johnson stated that he has always been favorable towards the up front street improvements because it solves problems at the time of the plat, basically not having to retrofit something later on. With regard to arterials, Wickstrom noted when we don't know how the alignment will Pit and when we try to match piece-meal improvements, sometimes we have to design it to fit what's existing and in the long run it will change. When we look at all the roads we have built, most of those arterials are in now and have been built with the support of LIDS. Our trend is towards hard improvements up front. Wickstrom suggested that a formal form of policy from Council be given to direct us to require up front improvements. Brubaker stated that he %%ill draft a Resolution for review and approval at the next Committee meeting. Permit Parking Ordinance Amendment Brubaker stated that the purpose of this Ordinance is to transfer authority to issue parking permits in the Centennial Center and City Hall from the Transportation Engineer to the Facilities Manager. During the discussion of this ordinance at the last Committee meeting, Leona Orr pointed out that this draft Ordinance established a 30 minute parking limit for the parking area between the Centennial Center and City Hall, Which she found to be unacceptable. Brubaker stated there is no reason to continue with this 30 minute limit and it ,,Nri11 be stricken from the Ordinance. Committee unanimously recommended approving the draft ordinance with the amendment of striking Section 9.38.080 Sub-Section 8 from the Ordinance. Code Revision Brubaker said there is a Public Works provision in the City Code which states that Public Works projects shall comply with the 1988 version of the Washington State Dept of Transportation Standards Specifications for Roads, Bridges and Highways. This section should reference the latest version. Committee unanimously recommended that the Citv Attornev amend Section 6.02.010 of the Citv Code to incorporate the latest revision of the Wa State Specifications. ��lr Kent City Council Meeting Date November 5 , 1996 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: CANYON CREST ESTATES FINAL PLAT FSU-96-6 - SET MEETING DATE 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Set December 10, 1996, as the date for a public meeting to consider a final plat application by Leroy Surveyors and Engineers. The preliminary subdivision was approved by King County and upon the Jones Hobbs annexation the final plat came under Kent' s jurisdiction. This plat is 9. 44 acres in size, consists of 19 lots, and is located at 9612 S. 222nd Street. 3 . EXHIBITS: None 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Staff (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6 . EXPENDITURE REOUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 30 �Pl Kent City Council Meeting Date November 5 , 1996 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: TRANSIT ADVISORY BOARD - APPOINTMENT 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Confirmation of the Mayor' s appointment of Paul Hammerschmidt to serve as a member of the Kent Transit Advisory Board. Mr. Hammerschmidt has been a resident of Kent for almost 10 years and is employed in Seattle. He also serves as an out of district volunteer with the Black Diamond Fire Department. Mr. Hammerschmidt will replace Jason Cooper. His term will become effective immediately and will continue to 4/30/98 . 3 . EXHIBITS: Memorandum from Mayor White 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Mayor White (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6 . EXPENDITURE REOUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 3P C ITV OF Jim White, Mayor MEMORANDUM TO: CHRISTI HOUSER, CITY COUNCIL PRESIDENT CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: JIM WHITE, MAYOR DATE: NOVEMBER 13, 1996 SUBJECT: APPOINTMENT TO KENT TRANSIT ADVISORY BOARD I have appointed Paul Hammerschmidt to serve as a member of the Kent Transit Advisory Board. Mr. Hammerschmidt has been a resident of Kent for almost 10 years and is employed in Seattle. He also serves as an out of district volunteer with the Black Diamond Fire Department. Mr. Hammerschmidt will replace Jason Cooper. His term will become effective immediately and will continue to 4/30/98. I submit this for your confirmation. JW:jb 2204th AVE.SO_ /KENT.WA.SFIINGTON 9603' S8, / if,LGPIIf).AF CU6 A29 SOU I FAX 4859-3;?1 Kent City Council Meeting Date November 5. 1996 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: LIBRARY BOARD - APPOINTMENT 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Confirmation of the Mayor's appointment of Mary Jene Heineman to serve as a member of the Kent Library Board. Ms. Heineman is a resident of Kent and is a member of the Friends of the Library. She was a volunteer at the Kent Food Bank for a time and is a frequent user of the Kent Library. Ms. Heineman will replace Karen Jordan, who resigned. Her time will become effective immediately and will continue to 1/1/2000. 3 . EXHIBITS: Memorandum from Mayor White 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Mayor White (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION• ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 3Q MEMORANDUM TO: CHRISTI HOUSER, CITY COUNCIL PRESIDENT CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: JIM WHITE, MAYOR DATE: NOVEMBER 13, 1996 SUBJECT: APPOINTMENT TO KENT LIBRARY BOARD I have appointed Mary Jene Heineman to serve as a member of the Kent Library Board. Ms. Heineman is a resident of Kent and is a member of the Friends of the Library. She was a volunteer at the Kent Food Bank for a time and is a frequent user of the Kent Library. Ms. Heineman will replace Karen Jordan who resigned. Her term will become effective immediately and will continue to 1/l/2000. I submit this for your confirmation. JW:jb:kno �O Kent City Council Meeting Date November 5 , 1996 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION - APPOINTMENT 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Confirmation of the Mayor' s appointment of Rev. Ray Morrison to serve as a member of the Kent Human Services Commission. Rev. Morrison has served as Pastor at the Church of the Nazarene in Kent for the past two years. Before coming to Kent he served as the Pastor of the Nazarene Church in Olympia for 16 years. In his spare time, he enjoys outdoor activities such as camping and fishing and he and his wife have a small antique business in Kent. Rev. Morrison will replace Mac D. Culver, who resigned. His term will become effective immediately and will continue to 1/1/99 . 3 . EXHIBITS: Memorandum from Mayor White 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Mayor White (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 3R MEMORANDUM TO: CHRISTI HOUSER, CITY COUNCIL PRESIDENT CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: JIM WHITE, MAYO DATE: NOVEMBER 14, 1996 SUBJECT: APPOINTMENT TO KENT HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION I have appointed Rev. Ray Morrison to serve as a member of the Kent Human Services Commission. Rev. Morrison has served as Pastor at the Church of the Nazarene in Kent for the past two years. Before coming to Kent he served as the Pastor of the Nazarene Church in Olympia for 16 years. In his spare time, he enjoys outdoor activities such as camping and fishing and he and his wife have a small antique business in Kent. Rev. Morrison will replace Mac D. Culver, who resigned. His term will become effective immediately and will continue to 1/l/99. I submit this for your confirmation. JW:jb ;11�f Kent City Council Meeting Date November 5 . 1996 Category Other Business 1. SUBJECT: HUMAN SERVICES MITIGATION CONSULTANT CONTRACT - AUTHORIZATION 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: On October 1, 1996, the City Council authorized establishment of a budget of $200, 000 for RJC Human Services mitigation and approved expending these funds, which were received from King County. Staff sent out a Request for Proposal to study the human services impacts of the Regional Justice Center. Staff has interviewed and selected a con- sultant, All For A Good Cause, to do this phase of the project in the amount of $74, 380. The Planning Committee took action on this item today, and Council is being asked to authorize the Mayor to sign the contract with All For A Good Cause. 3 . EXHIBITS: Memo and contract 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: City Council Planning Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves , Councilmember seconds that the Mayor be authorized to sign a contract with All For A Good Cause consultants in the amount of $74 , 380 . DISCUSSION• ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 4A CITY OF R7C�.� Planning Department (206) 859-3390/FAX (206) 850-2544 ames P. Harris, Planning Director Jim White, Mayor MEMORANDUM November 19, 1996 TO: MAYOR JIM WHITE AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: LIN HOUSTON, HUMAN SERVICES MANAGER SUBJECT: CONTRACT FOR THE REGIONAL JUSTICE CENTER HUMAN SERVICES IMPACTSTUDY Background In March of 1995 King County and the City of Kent entered into a mitigation agreement regarding the impacts of the Regional Justice Center (RJC). Appendix C of that Agreement provides for Human Services Mitigation. As part of the mitigation the County has given money to the City of Kent to study the impacts on the nonprofit human services delivery system and to develop a standardized data collection system for agencies. City staff has interviewed and selected a consultant to do the study in two phases: 1. Phase I begins before the RJC is open and will set up a data collection process and methodology to enable agencies to measure the impact of the RJC on human services delivery, and to apply for compensation for services. 2. Phase II begins after the RJC is open and will assess how effectively the human services system is serving users from the RJC and identify any gaps in services. Recommended Action 1. Authorization for the Mayor to sign a contract in the amount of S74,380 with ALL FOR A GOOD CAUSE to complete a human services impact study of the Regional Justice Center. LH/mp:a:rjc2.wpd/pg 2 cc: James P. Harris, Planning Director Carolyn Sundvall, Human Services Planner "0 ath AVE.SO- !KENT.WASH INGTON 09032-3Y95!TELEPHONF. �206,A5U-;100 i FAX k 959.333i CONSULTANT SERVICES CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF KENT AND "ALL FOR A GOOD CAUSE" THIS AGREEMENT is made by and between the City of Kent, a Washington municipal corporation (hereinafter the "City"), and "ALL FOR A GOOD CAUSE", organized under the laws of the State of Washington, located and doing business at 12525 17th NE, Seattle, Washington, 98125 (hereinafter the "Consultant"). Recitals 1. The City desires that the Consultant perform services necessary to conduct a human services impact study from the Regional Justice Center located at 401 North 4th Avenue Kent, Washington. 2. The Consultant agrees to perform the services more specifically described in the Scope of Work, dated December 4, 1996, including any addenda thereto as of the effective date of this agreement, attached hereto as Exhibit A which is incorporated herein by this reference as if fully set forth. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises set forth herein, it is agreed by and between the parties as follows: CONSULTANT CONTRACTIRIC HS IMPACT STUDY—Page 1 of 15 14:Nov 96 I. Description of Work Consultant shall perform all work as described in Exhibit A. Consultant further represents that the services furnished under this agreement will be performed in accordance with generally accepted professional practices in effect at the time such services are performed. II. Payment A. The City shall pay the Consultant, based on time and materials, an amount not to exceed $74,380 for the services described in Section I herein. This is the maximum amount to be paid under this Agreement for Tasks 1.1 - 2.4 in Exhibit A, and shall not be exceeded without the prior written authorization of the City in the form of a negotiated and executed supplemental agreement. PROVIDED, HOWEVER, the City reserves the right to direct the Consultant's compensated services under the time frame set forth in Section IV herein before reaching the maximum amount. The Consultant's billing rates shall be as delineated in Exhibit A. B. The Consultant shall submit monthly payment invoices to the City after such services have been performed, and a final bill upon completion of all the services described in this Agreement. The City shall pay the full amount of an invoice within forty-five (45) days of receipt. If the City objects to all or any portion of any invoice, it shall so notify the Consultant of the same within fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt and shall pay that portion of the invoice not in dispute, and the parties shall immediately make every effort to settle the disputed portion. CONSULTANT CONTRACTIRIC HS IMPACT STUDY—Page 2 of 15 14:Nov 96 C. In the event the Scope of Work is modified or changed so that more or less work or time is required by the Consultant, and such modification is reached by mutual agreement of the parties to this contract, the payment for services and maximum contract amount shall be adjusted accordingly upon agreement of the parties. III. Relationship of Parties The parties intend that an independent contractor-em p I over relationship will be created by this Agreement. As Consultant is customarily engaged in an independently established trade which encompasses the specific service provided to the City, no agent, employee, representative or sub-contractor of Consultant shall be or shall be deemed to be the employee, agent, representative or sub-contractor of the City. In the performance of the work, Consultant is an independent contractor with the ability to control and direct the performance and details of the work, the City being interested only in the results obtained under this Agreement. None of the benefits provided by the City to its employees, including, but not limited to, compensation, insurance, and unemployment insurance are available from the City to the employees, agents, representatives, or sub-contractors of the Consultant. Consultant will be solely and entirely responsible for its acts and for the acts of Consultant's agents, employees, representatives and sub-contractors during the performance of this Agreement. The City may, during the term of this Agreement, engage other independent contractors to perform the same or similar work. IV. Duration of Work The City and Consultant agree that work will begin on the tasks described in Exhibit A immediately upon execution of this Agreement. The parties agree that the work described CONSULTANT CONTRACT/RIC HS IMPACT STUDY—Page 3 of 15 14:Nov 96 in Exhibit A is to be completed within 1,244 calendar days of the execution of this Agreement; provided however, that additional time shall be granted by the City for excusable delays or extra work, as described in Section VI.(D) below. V. Place of Work The Consultant shall perform the work authorized under this Agreement at its offices in Seattle, Washington. Meetings with the City staff as described in Exhibit A, Scope of Work, shall take place at the City's offices at 400 West Gowe, Kent, Washinglorl, or at locations mutually agreed upon by the parties. VI. Termination A. Termination of Agreement If the City receives reimbursement by any federal, state, or other source for work described in Section I herein, and that funding is withdrawn, reduced or limited in any way, or the project is cancelled or substantially reduced after the execution date of this Agreement and prior to the completion of the work, the City may summarily terminate this Agreement. Termination shall be effective ten calendar days after Consultant's receipt of the written notice by certified mail. S. Termination for Failure to Provide Services Bargained For. The Consultant agrees that it was hired by the City based on the Consultant's representation that employees identified in the Scope of Work, attached CONSULTANT CONTRACT/R►C HS IMPACT STUDY—Page 4 of 15 14:Nov 96 hereto as Exhibit A, will be available to perform the services described in Section I for the duration of this Agreement. If any of the employees identified in the Scope of Work are unavailable to perform the services bargained for, for any reason, the City of Kent reserves the right to terminate this contract or renegotiate the amount of consideration. The consultant must immediately notify the City, in writing, if any employee identified in the Scope of Work is unavailable to perform the services described in Section I of this Agreement. Nothing in the foregoing language will alter the Consultant's independent contractor status. C. Termination for Failure to Prosecute Work or to Comolete Work Satisfactori Iv If the Consultant refuses or fails to prosecute the work with such diligence as will ensure its completion within the time frames specified herein, or as modified or extended as provided in this Agreement, or to complete such work in a manner consistent with the standard of care in Consultant's profession, then the City may, by written notice to the Consultant, give notice of its intention to terminate the Consultant's right to proceed with the work. On such notice, the Consultant shall have ten (10) calendar days to cure, to the satisfaction of the City or its representative, or the City shall send the Consultant a written termination letter which shall be effective upon the Consultant's receipt of the written notice by certified mail. Upon termination, the City may take over the work and prosecute the same to completion, by contract or otherwise, and Consultant shall be liable to the City for any additional costs incurred by it in the completion of the Scope of Work referenced as Exhibit A and as modified or amended prior to termination. "Additional Costs" shall mean all reasonable costs incurred by CONSULTANT CONTRACT/RIC HS IMPACT STUDY—Page 5 of 15 14:Nov 96 the City beyond the maximum contract price specified in Section II(A), above. D. Excusable Delays The right of Consultant to proceed shall not be terminated nor shall Consultant be charged with liquidated damages for any delays in the completion of the work due to: 1) any acts of the federal government in controlling, restricting, or requisitioning materials, equipment, tools, or labor by reason of war, national defense, or other national emergency; 2) any acts of the City, its consultants, or other public agencies causing such delay; and 3) causes not reasonably foreseeable by the parties at the time of the execution of the Agreement that are beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the Consultant, including, but not restricted to, acts of God, fires, floods, strikes, or weather of unusual severity; and (4) negotiated and executed supplemental agreements between the City and Consultant for Consultant to perform extra work defined as tasks not included in the Scope of Work referenced as Exhibit A. PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that the Consultant must promptly notify the City within ten (10) calendar days in writing of the cause of the delay. If, on the basis of the facts and the terms of this Agreement, the delay is properly excusable, the City shall, in writing, extend the time for completing the work for a period of time commensurate with the period of excusable delay. E. Ri hits Upon Termination In the event of termination, the City shall pay for all services performed by the Consultant to the effective date of termination, as described on a final invoice submitted to the City. After termination, the City may take CONSULTANT CONTRACT/RJC HS IMPACT STUDY—Page 6 of 15 14:Nov 96 possession of all records and data within the Consultant's possession pertaining to this project which may be used by the City without restriction. Any such use not related to the project which Consultant was contracted to perform shall be without liability or legal exposure to the Consultant. VII. Discrimination In the hiring of employees for the performance of work under this Agreement or any sub- contract hereunder, the Consultant, its sub-contractors, or any person acting on behalf of such Consultant or sub-contractor shall not, by reason of race, religion, color, sex, national origin, or the presence of any sensory, mental, or physical disability, discriminate against any person who is qualified and available to perform the work to which the employment relates. VI I I. Indemnification Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, injuries, damages, losses or suits, including all legal costs and attorney fees, arising out of or in connection with the performance of this Agreement, except for injuries and damages caused by the sole negligence of the City. The City's inspection or acceptance of any of Consultant's work when completed shall not be grounds to avoid any of these covenants of indemnification. Should a court of competent jurisdiction determine that this Agreement is subject to RCW 4.24.115, then, in the event of liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons CONSULTANT CONTRACT/RIC HS IMPACT STUDY—Page 7 of 15 14!Nov 96 or damages to property caused by or resulting from the concurrent negligence of the Consultant and the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers, the Consultant's liability hereunder shall be only to the extent of the Consultant's negligence. IT IS FURTHER SPECIFICALLY AND EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD THAT THE INDEMNIFICATION PROVIDED HEREIN CONSTITUTES THE CONSULTANT'S WAIVER OF IMMUNITY UNDER INDUSTRIAL INSURANCE, TITLE 51 RCW, SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS INDEMNIFICATION. THE PARTIES FURTHER ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THEY HAVE MUTUALLY NEGOTIATED THIS WAIVER. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. IX. Insurance The Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, employees, sub-consultants or sub-contractors. Before beginning work on the project described in this Agreement, the Consultant shall provide a Certificate of Insurance evidencing: 1 . Automobile Liability insurance with limits no less than $1,000,000 combined single limit per accident for bodily injury and property damage; and 2. Commercial General Liability insurance written on an occurrence basis with limits no less than $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence and $2,000,000 aggregate for personal injury, bodily injury and property damage. Coverage shall include but not be CONSULTANT CONTRACT/RIC HS IMPACT STUDY—Page 3 of 15 14:Nov 96 limited to: blanket contractual; products/completed operations/broad form property damage; explosion, collapse and underground (XCU) if applicable; and employer's liability; and The City shall be named as an additional insured on the Commercial General Liability insurance policy, as respects work performed by or on behalf of the Consultant and as copy of the endorsement naming the City as additional insured shall be attached to the Certificate of Insurance. The City reserves the right to receive a certified copy of all the required insurance policies. The Consultant's Commercial General Liability insurance shall contain a clause stating that coverage shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respects to the limits of the insurer's liability. The Consultant's insurance shall be primary insurance as respects the City and the City shall be given thirty (30) days prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, of any cancellation, suspension or material change in coverage. X. Exchange of Information The City warrants the accuracy of any information supplied by it to Consultant for the purpose of completion of the work under this Agreement. The parties agree that the Consultant will notify the City of any inaccuracies in the information provided by the City as may be discovered in the process of performing the work, and that the City is entitled to rely upon any information supplied by the Consultant which results as a product of this Agreement. CONSULTANT CONTRACTIRIC HS IMPACT STUDY—Page 9 of 15 14:Nov 96 XI. Ownership and Use of Records and Documents Original documents, drawings, designs and reports developed under this Agreement shall belong to and become the property of the City. All written information submitted by the City to the Consultant in connection with the services performed by the Consultant under this Agreement will be safeguarded by the Consultant to at least the same extent as the Consultant safeguards like information relating to its own business. If such information is publicly available or is already in Consultant's possession or known to it, or is rightfully obtained by the Consultant from third parties, Consultant shall bear no responsibility for its disclosure, inadvertent or otherwise. All data, documents and files created by Consultant under this Agreement may be stored at Consultant's office in Seattle, Washington. Consultant shall make such data, documents, and files available to the City upon its request at all reasonable times for the purpose of editing, modifying and updating as necessary until such time as the City is capable of storing such information in the City's offices. Duplicate copies of this information shall be provided to the City upon its request, and at reasonable cost. Any use or reuse of the documents, data and files created by Consultant for the City on this project by anyone other than Consultant on any other project shall be without liability or legal exposure to Consultant. XII. Recyclable Materials Pursuant to Chapter 3.80 of the Kent City Code, the City requires its contractors and consultants to use recycled and recyclable products whenever practicable. A price preference may be available for any designated recycled product. CONSULTANT CONTRACT/RJC HS IMPACT STUDY—Page to of 15 14:Nov 96 XIII. City's Right of Inspection Even though Consultant is an independent contractor with the authority to control and direct the performance and details of the work authorized under this Agreement, the work must meet the approval of the City and shall be subject to the City's general right of inspection to secure the satisfactory completion thereof. The Consultant agrees to comply with all federal, state, and municipal laws, rules, and regulations that are now effective or in the future become applicable to Consultant's business, equipment, and personnel engaged in operations covered by this Agreement or accruing out of the performance of such operations. XIV. Consultant to Maintain Records to Support Independent Contractor Status On the effective date of this Agreement (or shortly thereafter), Consultant shall: A. File a schedule of expenses with the Internal Revenue Service for the type of business Consultant conducts; B. Establish an account with the Washington State Department of Revenue and other necessary state agencies for the payment of all state taxes normally paid by employers, register to receive a unified business identifier number from the State of Washington; and C. Maintain a separate set of books and records that reflect all items of income and expenses of Consultant's business, all as described in the Revised Code of Washington (RCW) Section 51.08.195, as required to show that the services performed by Consultant under this Agreement shall not give rise to an employer-employee relationship between the parties which is subject to RCW Title 51, Industrial Insurance. CONSULTANT CONTRACT/RIC HS IMPACT STUDY—Page 11 of 15 14:Nov 96 XV. Work Performed at Consultant's Risk Consultant shall take all precautions necessary and shall be responsible for the safety of its employees, agents, and subcontractors in the performance of the work hereunder and shall utilize all protection necessary for that purpose. All work shall be done at Consultant's own risk, and Consultant shall be responsible for any loss of or damage to materials, tools, or other articles used or held for use in connection with the work. XVI. Non-Waiver of Breach The failure of the City to insist upon strict performance of any of the covenants and agreements contained herein, or to exercise any option herein conferred in one or more instances shall not be construed to be a waiver or relinquishment of said covenants, agreements or options, and the same shall be and remain in full force and effect. XVII. Resolution of Disputes and Governing Law Should any dispute, misunderstanding, or conflict arise as to the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement, the matter shall first be referred to the City, and the City shall determine the term or provision's true intent or meaning. The City shall also decide all questions which may arise between the parties relative to the actual services provided or to the sufficiency of the performance hereunder. If any dispute arises between the City and Consultant under any of the provisions of this Agreement which cannot be resolved by the City's determination in a reasonable time, or if Consultant does not agree with the City's decision on the disputed matter, jurisdiction of CONSULTANT CONTRACT/R►C HS IMPACT STUDY—Page 12 of 15 14:Nov 96 any resulting litigation shall be filed in King County Superior Court, King County, Washington. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. In any claim or lawsuit for damages arising from the parties' performance of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to compensation for all legal costs and attorney's fees incurred in defending or bringing such claim or lawsuit, in addition to any other recovery or award provided by law; provided, however, nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to limit the City's right to indemnification under Section Vill of this agreement. XVIII. Written Notice All communications regarding this Agreement shall be sent to the parties at the addresses listed on the signature page of the agreement, unless notified to the contrary. Any written notice hereunder shall become effective upon the date of mailing by registered or certified mail, and shall be deemed sufficiently given if sent to the addressee at the address stated in this Agreement or such other address as may be hereafter specified in writing. XIX. Assignment Any assignment of this Agreement by the Consultant without the written consent of the City shall be void. If the City shall give its consent to any assignment, the terms of this agreement shall continue in full force and effect and no further assignment shall be made without the City's consent. CONSULTANT CONTRACT/RIC HS IMPACT STUDY—Page 13 of 15 14:Nov 96 XX. Modification No waiver, alteration, or modification of any of the provisions of this Agreement shall be binding unless in writing and signed by a duly authorized representative of the City and Consultant. XXI. Entire Agreement The written provisions and terms of this Agreement, together with any Exhibits attached hereto, shall supersede all prior verbal statements of any officer or other representative of the City, and such statements shall not be effective or be construed as entering into or forming a part of or altering in any manner this Agreement. The entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereunder is contained in this Agreement and any Exhibits attached hereto. All of the above documents are hereby made a part of this Agreement and form the Agreement document as fully as if the same were set forth herein. Should any language in any of the Exhibits to this Agreement conflict with any language contained in this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail. [Signatures on following page.] CONSULTANT CONTRACT/RIC HS IMPACT STUDY—Page 14 of 15 14:Nov 96 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties below have executed this Agreement. CONSULTANT THE CITY OF KENT by by its its DATE: DATE: Notices to be sent to: Notices to be sent to: CONSULTANT Mr. James P. Harris Director of Planning The City of Kent 220 Fourth Avenue South Kent, Washington 98032 (206) 859-3390 APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST: Kent City Attorney Kent City Clerk CONSULTK.gen CONSULTANT CONTRAC IRIC HS IMPACT STUDY—Page 15 of 15 14:Nov 96 n n) m m o S T ° o p m O C� ° a m CDs a a 0 C� m p a _ - mg omm c cD o '-` 0 ° m mo m m cma 00 3m m 0 T. � o 0o mom `ego M ? ° 0 o_ 0c _o � o � m ° ° m v O a 3' m Q `� C — O _C In m Dl M N c CD Cn 7c (D y cn 0 0 CD Z D v 0 3 0 0 0 m m o o a 2 v v; 3 rn o n m - m 3 m N 0. � � o :° mm o av m o ci c m y m °) ° v m o m 0. '° 0 0 5. CD < o o W m CL3' o� � m S o ° 0 m cn o CD m cn D um, � 3a � Oti CDC, a m �. '� mo. m 3 �, o ° 0 O N m - m o Q m°. 0' s y o m ° omi c 0 m ° m oc 3c Imoc mom m a =• � c (� o v, o 0cD as cn O co CD ^ m n m 0CD a CD a ° " n a 3 c CD 01 ° (D Z < < 0 `� ° cn,< CD 0 am 0 mm3 cow N � � cmi y m w• � _ coi23 a3 � ° N < mao CD C)3a umia CD c —� 0_ ° m �• y m y m m y D ° m m CD w amm c 0 � 0 m � m m v 0 o * m 2 3 o � m' < o `< (� 0 o o - D 0 - m m w 0 n' m o m a ° 0 -^ m yma cn mm 0 � 0m 00 m m w Cl c 0 o v -a m to <_. 3 0 0 m 0 m m 0 m cn 0 CA 7 < m m yCD S n T D) o m 7 f`<n Ccn c L]. O m N a ( c �) O, -, m m � m mo ' a� a ? m `� � 3 cD v m c � m -a WcD 0v, > > 0 � �' � a� om a m 03 � CD xo � ma ^� a - m � � 00 0 v) m ° = m = o- 0 °� �' m o m v 41 cn 0 m o 0 m z N o cn 0 3 0 m T: 3 a3 < o s U) 3 m my = m v m CD Fr c c -0 m 2 � 0 ^ m s CD sn o m ; N m v, 0_ n m 6) m cn _L N Q — 0. N m 3 N a `<l< O' 7 ° CD CD m c l< � ICE pcn 0 0 cn 3' p O N< c D) c 0 0 3 c CD c F' m � m � o CD o m < o v 3m 0-_l< cm m - v3 ym O rL :3 c`) o c� v o CL 03 o CL 0 a co CD m CL C7 �n = _, 0 mm' 0 BCD � m o � o �' a 0 y -0 ° Cz cn m O 0 m a o = 0 52. Nl' m nm a cn m a = 0 m 0. " 0 c 0 (n CL 0 m v o c 0 0 0 = _ 3 m x_ m : 3 Q °-' �' v O �. m m 7 m cnS O .� (n r0„ c Oa `< O m. < O_ 7�P 0. O c O - O FD' cr o m m 3 m 27 ^m m 0 l< x a) O ? 3 0 cD _L cn D � m. CD p M p M CDCD _I J O C 0 O N SN Cc A O Cn A II CD cc (c cc � a)m cc v Q) v Q) to CD C V • • �• (° -w • • • • (D - W N • M. (D M D) n S > > 0 cn oo 3 oo <O 30 o m w m x c m m 03 = a ° 3m0 0 = 3g3 • • v � °m3 � 3 � mo_ o@m0x M co (D m e ? o 0 m o m o. 3 . 0 c m = c � � � a c � -o m '< s . w o m o m m ° a m (D 0 0 0 Co m o v <° a) a o y o v • m 3 0- co 3 0 m �m m o m < 0 0 0 (n Qo' a p0, 3 m 3 0 0 m ° 3 w ° oc c mm (no 0 c o vm c cc 0 x _ 3 _ CD -� in m m o CD m 3 a a � m o cn a co o a y o o m o m ° *, m m ° °o T m ci m c o 0 3. -« c (D 0 0 0 (o m < m 3 °—' o, m =; 3 = v c Sao c N �, n 3 am0. 3 O arno ' * mo memo '' (n -0 0 cc cCD (o (°n Ul 'O m (D N 7 O - ° cn v (Q _+ N 0 7 O N (D W CL`. a T y a N m N v '< (D m 0 (°' D] n = o n 3 � a C f v 0 c m cn O r� D) N ^' 0 D7 D] c O (D (D S n. 0 D1 `GCD 0 m D) D) cn N � Q � a3i �Ja �' � m o c o m - m m m 0 0 cn ' cmi c v - c o � c — CDCD m o o 0 m (n (� m Q v o m n 3 '� c D3 mmocn 0 a m o �.< CL (n o c a � 0 3a:1 CD _' < 3 m o o y � 0 , aN m3 o m3- �+ mo CD CD v m 3 °' mc < o' � m0 ai 3Q 30 m arc � 0 5 ' m o ° .. 5, v 0 0 � ni o c c = o o a3 0 o CD cn o -0 CD o m m m (D -a0c w ma (n � 3c ° Qo3 H v �.,� D o cmn a o ami m m g < (n m X cc M � � o va 3 c_ m cc co co O m c cD m y 0 cn 0 • • • • n w O N CD T1 S 7 S a w 3 Nlc<n Q H °� ma v m 0 m m (n m 0 � = o 3 cc vo c 30 � co c cc = off m (a 0 a 0 (o (n v m =, m cn (D o 3 0- < ca 2 N 7 D) D) 0 C `G N cn m CD ai 0 d 3 0 -, (D (D '< O CD O =cn O = Q CD 0 cn (n (D ma * 0 0 (° O_ O y (L7 cm) 0 = 0 Cfl N N O m O) ° 0 Cn O v O 0 CD CD 0 (n D) :3C) O_ _ n m a 0 v �� - O CD cn CD C O 'G 0 � c (D 0 cn c _ la (O CD X O_ O (p (° D N CAD L L N O 0' � N cn 7 a (J7 CPI m 7 v N com CD (0 (D � V N ? y w o n -0 p C -0 v = 0 C- v n m Cn cn O v 3 Cl v -0C_ -0 • • • x 0 o O O C 0. w m 0 �. v N 7 2 N O O (D ..-- 0 A N 0 S m c D � mcr om a < 3m o � N. C_ -•cn' om � � (D y o � 3 � D (D °_ C °�,' 3 � � a CD (o -C CD � -; (Dc cm3 coo (ooma° ma° c3 CD m m mw coa) 3 � 3 CDCD oo N � � ma CDym fD � °' � o � m ° (°n � m 0 cca m o 0 0 0 M =r 0- o CD 0 T Q - - � C_ m 07 0- c a c m o ° w CD En ma) g cn --0 0 y o 0 _. c m m m � -0 o o o m CD = a m Q a = � 3 o O v < 0 T 0 o c ? = = ° — ° ° C o N o co o ° v C n v ov " a 3c°7n0o y 00 v0 (o C CDCFo C: y Qm 000 CD .00 = MCL ? cn o o 0 a CD c s n n.m a m C D) (D (!f.G O O w = Cc a) N O J O (D N O T CD N O CL CD N 0 0 C CD C- ° 0 0 0 a cn G 3 m o 3 CD 0 M. (D (D C < CD a) y O � (Q C = M t< T a) (D O 3 v �_, CD CD cn (D �-o m ° ? m ° o (D n 3 0 0 c •o o v (n o C_ - a o ° v c o a Ci m a' m m c C, 0 a 3 m < o x 3 = o o m D c ° m 0 CD (° (' (C o °� a m m cC (n m a v a • • • • _ 0 V ° N mo N y al 7 O 0 (� 00 S O =• cn a)CD 23 O CL o -aIn � CD a EF cc o c (D 0 CD CD o �' o m m T m v CD< m a cn m 0 3 c (D a m v � cn co mCD ° (D m m 3 m 0 (if o Q m (D F. CD - m co m v m 0 S cn 0 0 ° �. 3 c c a� m (° C x a D C- O CO CD CD Q Q Q o_ (D -1 a � Ut N A C) m O a N 03 (I1 O T J (JJ = 2 a > § 7 \ � / \ �C. 6stq \3 { J / ® o // 2 / � � o m , ' « j— « k� Ii Steƒ / \ - = \\3 � n w » ; ;u cn M a)i wƒ \ \ �Mto \ 0 ES-a � » n gu CD - � wZf = gn f ¥ = a M » fs2 ® = S ° 2 � = a ° S 2 � / 7 \ k ƒ \ @ ) / = \ ] Ra \ , E @ ° ° £ ° � \ ) \ ' g \\ 3 Q ± i e g N _ _ _ _ = 2 kMm 2 \ c } \ƒ - o ) § 0k 0 (D i * _ - , 2 § E / , 3 m2 \ § / \/ \ ' ) \ f me / 0 ms wa = (D=w cr 3 ® E < m / , _ _ � \ \ § \ E Q3 $ /f \ k / gg / 3CD 3 \ w \\ <D \ ; CaG ( ; 7 , ; _ ; Em _ ; Ca CD -,< = c ecn m £= 5 = \ , [ ; 2 E m : E , 300 / ° G ( tM0 M0 § 5E s = E , > G 2 5 f 2 5 = a ( E i « E m z gq 37 0 Jac CL M �� \ § _ c ' ? § ® ® 2 � ƒ @ / - CD / CD / ( \ e o M \ \ e c_ / / \ \ M 7 ; ) \ £ g 2 \ / \ \ / to t _ \ ] ® O N LO- w 3 N _ j N O o c c = = - c s C = m c l< m C- 0 = BCD o m U' (D = o m ° o o C (Dn N c O m m m m o m (D (n a. � 0 y a < C � - � (D 3 O = y m3 � � N2. CD �n �' �. � � m � � mg (C m�. `0 cmn �co r r n 3 v N m `cl) e m n W `< n0 -1 , c a � N a O_ m 'a 67 cn m ,.« D 3 m ami �' �' ccn CD �D C� " ° z o =' •• cn 3 o m 41 °� < a m m m m _ � = m 3 � m (n 3 cc o = (n m - =r cc -, awe °-' N G o X m `� c m e 3 3 a ° . m = n oc co T _ c M m v' -o ;U v y = co ; n m m = 0• m = m m v 3 °: m `2 m cn c- ° = c 3 cn m = ° a s m e o = 2 = c C) a ° c c • m a m m m m m co m M 7 d T G (y m = m rw m = < n (c 91 7; - ^r � y S m m m N N � 0 p) (n Q m n1 61 O. = m m a a m (D O 'O =f < fA Q D) m m .•. O C C — o = m C Q . N (D m c c = m m < < m = .0 � 3 Q = M m m acn cn c f � m naa y a ma acim3mo 0 cn mov 01 = w (D y cc �_ U) c N m c a m c 0 N m m o_ m r a < - c c = _ a-a ^. m m C v (D :< N m O. N w c d N C p C1 a a S m m (D 3 m � �c = N. m m (D a o m O M CD CD =..a m Q. c m m -1 m m m • _ < s = * a c a CD (D CDD CD CL 'a a 3 c 3 v m N = o � m � ^ C com m (D CD x c � < 41 ° a m a c ° m D n o o �, a. -o = = m m a O_ = m c = = a CL G m cn v v, `m m a. cM � . CL = mccmm v � ° � T c3 Nc a� m t j (D ° ? m C7 y O = 0 cn (0 �' C N ° ? m m `Z a 3 O — (D = O co C (Dm a) m s y CL m nm m _ m m u m �m = o a a a 3 3 _ CD o m • • • • • C7 O c _ y � � c o = CD C: CD o m O C 'O 3 (D -0 _• 67 m O N C '9 1 aoi ° fm m CD ° Na =- C cn , =v mm CD CD CD m o ~ 0 om =wm (D @ m (n a' c =n 3 � mX � mQoc �' � CD n3 m � am M 0 (n c m o m 7 _- < _ ° cn c = c cn cc a n. C- m c m .0 c 3 co c c = m w 2 3 <' (D -o CD M a c < c -0 l< m m v 0 N C (D M m m y c ;7 c CD (D y G m (�-�' m 67 < X Q- o mFD- v, m C7 CD _ a_ Q CD 0 o cc _ O (D O (D - O to (D O (D v o o (D o v n o m cn --IW 2 9 M R 93 + / § a27 / CnCDn / ro ƒ ago . . . , }\ 0 (D § � 0c14 > acE22 � k \6 $ ¥ o m q c: , : ; ® � oea @ - ) = > E = 0 - - -0 k � \ e & . 7 ° e = « G : E — 2CD E — o M — Eon = & \ , m2 : / / ) ƒ\ ] � 0 (D g / �t m ] ® \ 2E ] 4 \ 00 7 ] 7a w w n ° / 2 , = ° ° ° � , E Eoms § o ( kn? § \ � / \o /t M \ 0 0 Crm � -� e % = CD — J 23 m — , cn 6 = = i 0 o 0 e CL § a a } E ] <CD cn c » = / ° § 0E m = gym 2 \ _ & G § 9 _ EC: < ) m am0 § 2 — � ate $ & O esin 0 k }CD 0(D ( j 772 __ — _ \ 0 ; a = = ® 0m ® \ 0 E § \ \ » o \ _ =2 = , / & j / \ CC2 { 0 w ; \ 0 :3 = % & 2 0 & _ = ECC j « � 0 ) / < / \ \ D / co CDk S § m a \ \ ; & a ° K ® e ) § 2 » s § \ ƒ \ / In § ƒ § ƒ = CL } m / / ƒ \ i 2 c = t.,G 0.. 1 1 r I h H C U t L 1.,r1=t�:I.L l I l 4 .(� N L C ,i' u c r /�LUKLJ 11/13/1996 PIN RoodOET-�206)363-1110 FAX (206)363-2044 1nl am I it-ATE j S S cn r ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE FURV Nowogroski Insurance Associates HCLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND CR 'i'-0i 40 Meridian Avenue N. #210 ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. 'Seattle, WA 98133 COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE COMPANY "Navelers Ind Co IAtt, Ext: A l' ":1ED - COMPANY All For A Good Cause e Sylvie McGee .. . .. ........ 12525 17th N E COMPANY C Seattle, WA 98125 .................. .......... .._._.._..._....... COMPANY D COVERAGES: . l THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED,NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT,TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN,THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECTTO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES.LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS- .. ...................................................._...._......._........_...................__.....---..._.............-_...._.__...---__--___ _._.....__.........................---..........................._......................._...-........... .. CO TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER PCUCY EFF-cCTIVE PCUCY EXPIRA'nCN: LIMITS LTR DATE(MMICOrM DATE(MMICONYI E GENERAL LIABILITY :GENERAL AGGREGATE - S 2,000,000 ....... ................................................................................... X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY PRODUCTS-COMPIOP AGG S 2,000,000 -,......:.._... ........ :......_..._.......__................_...._....._...........__.... .......... �'' = CWIMS MADE X ! OCCUR i i f PERSONAL dADV INJURY •S -::;.. 1,000 000 q ':.......... ....... 680-952W8780 11/13/1996 11/13/1997 ..........----......................................._ ---.....-z .... OWNER'S 8 CONTRACTOR'S PROT; ? EACH OCCURRENCE S 1,000,C00 __..: i ..-._................ .............:_._ ........ X Employers Liabilit FIRE DAMAGE(Amone rve) ;s 300,000 .................................................................................... MEO EXP(Arty one Person) S 5,000 AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY - - COMBINE]SINGLE![MIT S �( ANY AUTO 1,000,000 ALL OWNED AUTOS ..... BOD ILY INJURY SCHEDULED AUTOS ' p(PW Pmcn) A :810-95ZW9266 11/13/1996 11/13/1997 :._ ...... ............ ._ X. HIRED AUTOS BCOILY INJURY , NON-OWNED AUTOS (Percent) ', '....... ...................................................... [ i PROPERTY DAMAGE S - GARAGE LIABILITY AUTO ONLY-EAACCIDE.NT S ..._..- - ........................................ . ANY AUTO :OTHER THAN AUTO ONLY: - i EACHACCIDENT S AGGREGATE S EXCESS LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE S ........ ...................................................................................... UMBRELLA FORM i AGGREGATE S OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM �,y,ft WORKERS COMPENSATION AND TCRY LIMITS - ER '- ' E!APLOYERS'UABIUTY - ' E'_EACH ACC:C ENT $ THE PROPRIETOR/ : INCL j i E DISEASE-PCUCY LIMIT S PARTNERSlEXECUTIVE OFFICERS ARE [ EXCL: i EL DISEASE-EA EMPLOYEE S OTHER DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONSILOCATIONSIVEHIC''ESlSPECIAL ITEMS rtificate Holder is additional insured as regards work performed for them by the named .nsured during the policy term shown. ERTIFiCATE HCL O card LAric SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POUQES BE CANCELLED BE°ORE THE EXPIRATION GATE THEREOF,THE ISSUING COMP ANY'MLL ENCEAVCR TO MAIL City of Kent :�() —DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HCLDER NAMED TD THE LEFT. irector of Planning James P. Harris BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALLJMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR UABIUN 220 4 to Ave. S. OF ANY KJNO UPON THE COMPANY,nS AGENTS CA REPRESENTATIVES. Kent, WA 98032-5895 AUTHCRIZED REPRESENTATIVE /I Jean -Moffett/MOFF1 :CORD 25-S (itSS) CACCRB COAPORATICN 19S3 POLICY NUMBER: 630-952W3730 COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY THIS EYDORSENIENT CH.A2YGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. ADDITIONAL INSURED - OWNERS, LESSEES OR CONTRACTORS (FORM B) This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following: COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART. SCHEDULE Name of Person or Organization: The City of Kent, RE: Work performed for City of Kent Director of Planning, James P.Harris, 220 Fourth Avenue S, Kent,WA 98032 (If no entry appears above, information required to complete this endorsement will be shown in the Declarations as applicable to this endorsement.) WHO IS AN INSURED(Section II) is amended to include as an insured the person or organization shown in the Schedule,but only with respect to liability arising out of your ongoing operations performed for that insured. CO 20 10 10 93 Copyright, Insurance Semites Office, Inc., 1992 �1111 Kent City Council Meeting Date November 5 , 1996 Category Other Business 1. SUBJECT: SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT REGULATIONS ZCA-96-6 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: The proposed Zoning Code amendment was recommended by the Land Use and Planning Board to revise the current single family residential development standards. 3 . EXHIBITS: Staff report, Land Use and Planning Board minutes of October 28 , 1996 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Staff (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: — 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds approve the Kent Zoning Code Amendment (ZCA-96-6) to revise the current single family residential development standards as recommended by the Land Use and Planning Board, and to direct the City Attorney to prepare the necessary ordinance. DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 4B PLEASE ADD THE ATTACHED STAFF REPORT TO YOUR COUNCIL PACKET UNDER ITEM #49- "SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS" ,Jim vvinte, lviavur Planning Department (206) 859-3390/FAX(206) 850-2544 James P. Harris, Planning Director October 17, 1996 TO: STEVE DOWELL, CHAIR, LAND USE & PLANNING BOARD FROM: FRED N. SATTERSTROM, PLANNING MANAGER RE: PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING MAXIMUM PERMITTED DENSITY STANDARDS (#ZCA-96-6) BACKGROUND Durina the Planning Board's August and October workshops, staff reviewed recent ordinances passed by the Kent City Council relative to single family residential zoning. These ordinances, Ordinances 43268 and #3290, revised the development standards for single family zones and chanced the titles of the zones from one based on lot size (such as R1-7200) to one based on a density factor (such as SR-6). Both of these ordinances are attached for your reference. Adopted in April 1995,the Kent Comprehensive Plan suggested changes to single family residential zoning regulations in order to allow for more flexibility in terms of building and site design, (SEE, specifically LU-10). Ordinances 93268 and 93290 were designed to accomplish this. Ordinance #3268 (December 1995) revised the development standards for single family zones by providing more flexibility for site design_ For example, lot width, minimum lot size, and front yard setback standards were reduced while site coverage regulations were increased. Ordinance #3290 (April 1996) further clarified #3268 by providing a "maximum permitted density", re-naming the single family zoning districts, and clarifying other minor aspects of single and multiple family zoning districts. The intent of these zoning chances was to permit greater flexibility in single family residential development in order to achieve comprehensive plan goals. As discussed at the Board's workshops, the implementation of Ordinance #3290 had an unanticipated, inhibitive effect on potential subdivision of"in-fill" lots. That is to say, lots which may have been subdivided under R1-12.0 zoning (for instance, a lot which was 24,000 sq. fr. in size) were prohibited from subdividing under the new SR-3 zoning. Under SR-3 zoning, over 28,700 sq. ft. are required in order to subdivide an additional lot. This inhibitive effect on subdivision seems to impact only in-fill lots %,which are generally less than an acre and where there are few, if anv, requirements for dedication of land for roads or storm water purposes. Short or long plats which --- 1104111 aVl'.. SO SFr.\f \\,\SIIIVG'T,0%G Wnt+.ig-)' ' If P1107 1- qn rn4i.1;10i �� aCi .U1J AMENDNIENT TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONNG October 17, 1996 Page 2 involve dedications or reservations of land for roads and utilities are benefited by the amended zoning standards. ALTERNATIVES AND ACTIONS Based on the Board's discussion of issues at the workshops, it was agreed that some modification of regulations should be initiated in order to rectify the abovementioned problem. Staff was requested to research possible alternatives and return in workshop to the Land Use and Planning Board. The following alternatives were considered: 1. "Grandfathering" ure-existing lots The Board had suggested some sort of"grandfather clause" be implemented for lots which previously could be subdivided under the "old" RI zoning. According to the City Attomey's office, this option is not possible since zoning cannot be vested without a compiete application for subdivision. Therefore, there is no valid way for the City to grandfather existing lots to previous zoning. 2. Change the "maximum permitted density" Ordinance 93290 specifies a maximum permitted density (MPD) for each single family residential zone. The MPD for the SR-2 zone is 2 units/acre, for SR-3 zone it is 3 units/acre, and so forth. These maximums are stated in Section 15.04.020 of the Kent Zonins Code; they represent rounded off numbers roughly equivalent to the previously RI-tilled zones which were based on minimum lot size requirements. This alternative would convert the rounded off MPD's to mathematically precise numbers carried out to the first or second decimal. To illustrate: Zone Maximum permitted density SR-1 1.0(1.00) units/acre SR-2 2.2 (2.18) units"acre SR-3 3.6 (3.63) units/acre SR-4.5 4.5 (4.53) units/acre SR-6 6.0 (6.05) units/acre SR-8 8.7 (8.71) units/acre AMENDMENT TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING October 17, 1996 Page 3 Implementation of this alternative would give credit for fractions of an acre which may be critical in lot splits and other in-fill development situations where the size of the parent lot is generally less than an acre. 3. Do Nothing alternative Under this alternative, no changes would be made to the existing density standards of the single family zoning districts. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Based on the discussions at the Land Use&Planning Board's workshops, staff recommends that the maximum permitted densities (MPD's) be amended for all single family residential zones (with the exception of the SR-1 zone) to coincide with density factors listed in AIternative 2, above. This methodology would make for a more precise determination of permitted density based on a conversion of the minimum lot sizes of previously R-1-titled zones. The following maximum permitted densities (MPD's) are recommended: Zone Maximum permitted density (units/acre) SR-2 2.18 SR-3 3.63 SR-4.5 4.53 SR-6 6.05 SR-8 8.71 a:sfzones2.mpd cc: Jim Harris, Planning Director U ;1 nLF ORDINANCE NO. s AN ORDI?NP.NCE of the City Council of the City of Kent , Washingtcr_, making certain DO5 -T- amendments to Chapter 15 . 04 of the Zoning Code, as recently amended by Ordinance No . 3268 , and making other amenaments to the � . z 5ol: Zonina Code to clarify previously established density standards . 5, O�' WHEREAS, The City of Kent Comprehensive Plan contains O • goals and policies which supporL G variety ety of housing types and yri� a densities throughout the City, including more single-family than s, d� D mllltifami ly resiCE_^lt1 l acVElO-ome-_ts, mcrE flexibility and 1n:'_OVat10n in terms of building and site design and residential setbacks ; and ,Gao , D36/,0g0/ / b� WHEREAS , the City of Kent Comprehensive Plan contains goals and policies which recommend Expansion o- home ownership opportuni ties for all income arou-c and 0 Oc! DOj 0 (l� WHEREAS, the City of Kent Comprehensive Plan contains _ goals and policies which recommend G revisea calculation system qqLJ for determining maximum allowable single family density; and ,�o o3J� b�3a51 .•.•rr,� p36 �� D 3 , OD )14 ' o p i� i WHEREAS, The City Council , On December 19 , 1995 , adopted Ordinance No. 3268 revising Kent Zoning Code provisions 1for single family residential development standards, consistent with the above coals and policies ; and WHEREAS, following adoption of Ordinance No . 3268 the Council has determined that corrective, non-substantive amendments should be made to the Zoning Ccde _to clarify the revisions made to the code pursuant to said Ordinance; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF K NT, WASHINCTON, DOES HEREEPY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS : SECTION 2 . There is hereby added to Chapter 15 . 02 of the Kent City Code, entitled "Definitions, " a new section, Section 15 . 02 . 096 , to read as follows : Sec . 15 . 02 . 096 . Density, maximum permitted. Maximum permitted density refers to the maximum number of single family dwelling units permitted per acre . For fractions of an acre, a maximum permitted density shall be proportional to the size of the lot . For example , where the maximum permitted density is six (6) single family dwelling units per acre, the maximum permitted density on one half (1/2) acre is three (3 ) single family dwelling units, subject to lot size and other development standards of Chapter 15 . 04 . 2 SECTION 2 . Chapter 15 . 02 of the Kent City Code entitled "Definitions" is amended by amending Section 15 . 02 . 487 to read as follows : i Sec. 15 . 02 .487 . Single-family district. A single-family zoning district is a zoning district with any of the following designations : "SR4 _ 5 = �SR5 . SK-8 , single-family residential, ia-_d residential ag g ricultural and F-1 . aricultural district . SECTION 3 . There is hereby added to Chapter 15 . 02 of the Kent City Code , entitled "Definitions , " a new section, Section 15 . 02 . 588 , to read as follows : Sec . 15 . 02 . 588 . Zoning districts-redefined. Any references in the Kent City Code to the former zonir_c districts R1-5 . 0 , R1-7 . 2 , R1-9 . 5 , R1--12 . 0 , R1-20 . 0 and R_L shall mean the zoning districts designated as follows : Former Zone Current Zone R1-5 . 0 SR-8 R1-7 . 2 SR-6 R1-9 . 5 SR-4 . 5 Ri-12 . 0 SR-3 R1-20 . 0 SR-2 RA SR-1 SECTION 4 . Section 15 . 04 . 005 of the Kent City Code is hereby amended to read as follows : Sec. 15 . 04 . 005 . Agricultural district, P_-1 . The stated coal of the city is to preserve prime agricultural land in the Green River Valley as a nonrenewable resource . The agriculture zone shall actively encourage the concentration of agricultural uses in areas where incompatibility with urban uses will be minimal to aid in the implementation of 3 i i; i those goals . Further, such classification of prime agricultural 1land thus recognizes and encourages farming activity as a viable iisector of the local economy. A. principally permitted uses. Principally permitted uses are as follows : '•j 1 . Agricultural uses, including any customary agricultural building or structure, such as planting, cultivation and harvesting of crops, animal husbandry, nurseries and greenhouses and other agricultural occupations . 2 . One (1) single-family dwelling per lot . 3 . Group homes class -A.E . Special permit uses. The following uses are permitted provided that they conform to the development standards listed in section 15 . 08 . 020 : 1 . Churches . 2 . Nursery schools ar_d day care centers . C. Accessory uses. Permitted accessory uses are as follows : 1 . Guest cottages not rented or otherwise conducted as a business . 2 . Accommcdatlons for farm Operators and employees, but not accommodations for transient labor . 3 . Roadside stands not exceeding four hundred (400) square feet in floor area, and not over twenty (20) lineal feet on any side, primarily for the sale of agricultural products on the premises . a . Customary incidental home occupations subject to the provisions of section 15 . 08 . 040 . 5 . Other accessory uses and buildings customar ly appurtenant to a permitted use . G . For permitted uses, hazardous substance land uses, including onsite hazardous waste treatment or storage facilities, which are not subject to cleanup permit requirements of chapter .11 . 02 and do not accumulate more than twenty thousand (20 , 000) pounds of hazardous substances or wastes or any corioination thereof at any one (1) time on the site, subject to the provisions of section c 15 . 08 . 050 , except offsite hazardous waste treatment or storace facilities , which are not permitted in this district . 7 . Accessory dwelling units . For r)urooses of this section Section 15 . 04 . 00S , accessory dwell-inc jj units shall not be included in calculatir_c the maximum densitv. i D. Conditional uses. Conditional uses are as follows : 1 . General conditional uses as listed in section 15 . 08 . 030 . 2 . For permitted uses, accessory hazardous substance land uses which are not subject to cleanup permit requirements of chapter 11 . 02 and which accumulate more than twenty thousand (20 , 000) pounds of ha z ar6c us substances or wastes or any c 0mh m a r l on thereof at any one (1) time on the site, subject to the provisions of section 15 . 08 . 050 , except offsite hazardous waste treatment or storage facilities, which are not permitted in this district . E . Development standards . The max-mum permitted density for the A-1 zonlnC dlstr=ct. is one sinale family dwellina unit Der acre . 1 . M r_Lnum lot. Minimum lot area is thirty-four thousand seventy hundred (34 , 700) square feet . 2 . Minimum lot width. Minimum lot width is sixty (60) feet . a. To determine lot width for irre_ c_ular lots , a circle of applicable diameter (the minimum lot width permitted) shall be scaled within the proposed boundaries of the lot , provided that an access easement to another lot is not included within the circle . 3 . Maximum site coverage. Maximum site coverage is thirty (30) percent . a . Minimum yard require__ments. a . Front yard. Minimum front yard is twenty (20) feet . 5 •I (1) Porches and private shared courtyard features may be built within the front building set back line . b . Side yard. Minimum side yard is fifteen (15) feet . C . Rear yard. Minimum rear yard is twenty (20) ii feet . f d. Side yard on flanking street of corner lot. Minimum side yard on the flanking street of a corner lot is twenty (20) feet . 5 . Heiaht limitation. The height limitation is two and one-half (2 1/2) stories, not exceeding thirty-five (35) feet . The height limitations shall not apply to barns and silos provided that they are not located within fifty (50) feet of any lot line . 6 . Additional standards. a . Structures for feeding, housing and care of l S animals , except household pets , Shal bE et back fifty (50) Feet from any property line . b . Eee chapter 15 . 03 , pertaining to general an" supplementary provisions , for requirements - concerning accessory buildings and additional standards . C . The following uses are prchibited: (1) The removal of topsoil for any purpose . (2) Grade and fill operations , provided that limited grade and fill may be approved as needed to construct buildings or structures as outlined in subsections 15 . 04 . 005 A. , B . , C. and D . (3 ) P_11 subsurface activities , including excavation for underground utilities , pipelines or other underground installations, that cause permanent disruption of the surface of the land. Temporarily disrupted soil surfaces Shall be restored In a manner consistent with agricultural uses . 6 (4 ) Dumping or storage of nonagricultural solid or liquid waste, or of trash, rubbish or noxious materials . (5) Activities that violate sound aaricultural soil and water conservation management practices . 7 . Maximum impervious surface coverage. Maximum impervious surface coverage is forty ( =10) percent of the total parcel area. a. Except for lots used for agricultural practices, the maximum impervious surface area allowed shall be ten thousand (10 , 000) square feet when the 1ct is greater than one (1) acre . 8 . Zero Iot line and clustering_ Minimum lot width, building setbacks, and minimum lot size reaulatlons mays be modified consistent with provisions for zero lot line and clustering housina development . F . Signs . The Sian regulations of c .apter 15 . OG shall apply- G. Offstreet par;cing. The offstreet parkina requ re:<<e-_ts of chapter 15 . 05 shall apply. SECTION 5. Section 15 . 05 . 010 cf the Kent City Code is hereby amended to read as follows : Sec . 15 . O4 . 010 . Residential agricultural district, The city has , through its SR-1 and P?A zcnes, the key to assuring efficient and attractive growth. It is essential that the city avoid excessive zoning far in advance of demand. Rezoning of Rz-SR-I and M_A lands to more intensive use shall be predicated upon the documentation of the need for additional residential , commercial or industrial land in the city. This documentation shall consist cf a fiscal impact analysis showing that the other lands already zoned and accessible to municipal services are not sufficient or suitable to acccmmodate demand for the proposed uses and that the market demand for the proposed 7 j j i ij i •i I development is sufficient to generate the revenues necessary to provide municipal services, including but not limited to police, fire, streets , water, drainage and sewer, required by the project . A. Principally permitted uses . Principally permitted uses are as follows : 1 . Agricultural uses, including any. customary agricultural building or structure, such as planting, cultivation and harvesting of crops, animal husbandry, nurseries and greenhouses and other agricultural occupations . 2 . One (1) sinale-family dwelling per lot . 3 . Group homes class I-A. B . Special peri t uses . The follcwinc_ uses are permitted provided that they conform to the development standards listed in section 15 . 08 . 020 : 1 . Churches . 2 . Nursery schools and day care centers . C . Accessory use's. Permitted accessory uses are as follows : 1 . Guest cottages not rented or otherwise conducted as a business . 2 . Acccmmcdat ions for farm operators and employees, but not accommodations for transient labor. 3 . Roadside stand not exceeding four hundred (�00) square feet in floor area, and not over twenty (20) lir_eal feet on any side, primarily for the sale of agricultural products crown on the premises . 4 . Customary incidental home occupations subject to the provisions of section 15 . 08 . 040 . 5 . Other accessory uses and buildings customarily appurtenant to a permitted use, except for cnsite hazardous waste treatment and storage facilities , which are not permitted in residential zones . G . Accessory dwelling units . For purposes of this section. Section 15 . 04 . 010 accessory dwelling units shall not be included in calculating the maximum permitted density. 8 D. Conditional uses. Conditional uses are as follows : general conditional uses as listed in section. 15 . 08 . 030 . E . Development standards . The maximum uermitted density for the SR-I zoning district is one single family dwellina unit oer acre . 1 . minimum lot. Minimum lot area is thirty-four thousand seven hundred (3a , 700) square feet . '! 2 . Minimum lot width. Minimum lot width is sixty (GO) feet . a . To determine minimum lot width for irre—•ular ' lots, a circle of aDDllcahle diameter (the minimum lot width permitted) shall be scaled within the proposed boundaries of the lot , provided" that an access easement, tc anCtncr lot is not included within the circle . _ 3 . Y?axLTr r site coverage. Maximum site coverage is thirty (30) percent . 4 . N_rinirul<< yard requirements. a . Fr=L -yard. Minimum front yard is twe.nzy (20) (!) Porches and pr=vate and shared' courtyard features may be built within the front buildine setback line . b . Side yard. Minimum side yard is fifteen (15) feet . C . Rear yard. Minimum rear yard is twenty (20) feet_ d. Side yard on flanking street of corer lot. Minimum side yard on the flanking street cf a corner lct is twenty (20) feet . 5 . eici_t limitaticn. The height limitation is two and one-half (2 1/2) stories, not exceeding thirty-five (35) feet . G . Additional standards . a . Structures for feeding, housing_ and care of animals, except household pe=_ shall be set back fifty (50) feet from any property line . a I i i b . See chapter 15 . 08 , pertaining to general and supplementary provisions, for requirements concerning accessory buildings and additional standards . ;j 7 . Maximum impervious surface coverage. Maximum impervious surface coverage is forty (40) percent of the total parcel area. a . Except for lots used for agricultural I practices , the maximum impervious surface area allowed shall be ten thousand (10, 000) square feet when the lot is greater than one (1) acre . 8 . Zero lot line and clustering. Minimum lot width, building setbacks, and minimum lot size reglllations may be modified consistent 4Jit1 provisions for zero lot line and clustering housing development . F. Signs. The sign regulations of chapter 15 . 05 shall apply. G. Offstreet parking. The off- street parking requirement of chaoter 15 . 05 shall apply. H. DEvElopme t plan review. Development plan review is required when the property to be developed is classified- as view property. SECTION 6. Section 15 . 04 . 020 of the Kent City Code is . hereby amended to read as follows : Sec . 15 . 04 . 020 . Single-family residential districts . It is the purpose of the single-family residential districts to stabilize and preserve low density, single-family residential neighborhoods . It is further the purpose to provide a range of minimum lot sizes in order to promote diversity and recognize a variety of residential environments . A. Districts established by _=�maximurn permitted density. The following single-family residential districts are established: 10 i i; 1 . £_ SR-2 Ci:. - - -_- -. I e t a__a .Two (2) sincle family dwelling units per acre . ... ---... -. let -_ooThree (3 ) sincle family dw.:Ilinc 'i units per acre . 1 - L- - - - - --- ) .-._� ^Our and One half (C 5 sincle family dwelling units Der acre . a . . SCR-E 47_L`__ ---- - dwelling units per acre . -�-- - -- (,i ) single family 6welling units per acre . D . Mini rlum Zoning area . Minimum zcnincr area for the r sSR-8 district is fifteen thousand (15 , 000) scl_uare feet (three (3 ) lots) . - C. Maximum ZOP_irc. area. Maximum. zon_ na area for the _ S.SR-E district is eiuht (E ) acres . D . Principally permitted useS. Principally permitted uses _ are aS follows : 1 . One (1) sincle-family dwelling per lot . 2 . Crop and tree farming. 3 . Group homes class I-A. E . Special pernit uses. The following uses .are permitted provided they conform to the development standards listed in section 15 . O8 . 020 : 1 . Churches . 2 . Nursery schools and day care centers . F. Accessory uses. Permitted accessory uses are as follows : 1 . Accessory uses and buildings customarily aDourtenant to a permitted use, such as garages, carports and minor structures for storage of personal property. 2 . Rooming and boarding cf not more than three (3 ) persons . 11 i 3 . Customy ar incidental home occupations suvj2Ct to the provisions of section 15 . 08 . 040 . : Z . Accessory dwelling units . For purpose of this section Section 15 . 04 . 020 accessory dwelling 1 units shall not be included in calculating the maximum permitted density. G. Conditional uses. Conditional uses are as follows : General conditional uses as listed in section 15 . 08 . 030 . H. Development standards . 1 . N�in?m= lot. Minimum lot area is as follows : a , r_ _^SR-2 : Sixteen thousand (16 , 000) square feet . b. _2SR-3 : Ninety-six hundred (9, 600) square fce= . C . _ SR-5 . 5 : Seventy-six hundred (7, 600) square feet . d. r= 2SR-6 : Fifty-seven hundred (5 , 700) =glare feet . e . -S 8 : Four thousand (4 , 000) square fc�t . 2 . y-:n,,i rr`: lOt width. T?i nimum lot width is as follow= : a . 20SR-2 : Fifty (50) feet . b . =2SR-3 : Fifty (50) feet . C . _ . '5R-4 . 5 : Fifty (50) feet . Fifty (50) feet . e . _ . "SR-6 : Forty (40) feet . f . To determine minimum lot width for irregular lots, a circle of applicable diameter (the minimum lot width permitted) shall be scaled Within the proposed boundaries of the lot , provided that an access easement to another lot is not included within the circle . 3 . M_aximum site coverage. Maximum site coverage is as follows : a. 2 SR-2 : Thirty (30) percent . b . _2GR-3 : Forty-five (55) percent . C . '_:_ ^ . .SR-a . 5 : Forty-five (45) percent . 12 r3, £_ —SR-6 : Fifty (50) percent . e , £_ S . SR-8 : Fifty-five (55) percent . + A . Minimum yard requirements. a . Front yard. Minimum front yard is ten (10) feet . :j (1) At least twenty (20) linear feet of driveway shall be provided between any garage, carport or other primary parking j area and the street property line with the exception cf an alley property line . (2 ) Porches and private and shared courtyard features may be built within the front building setback line . (3 } Proposed front yards less than twenty (20) feet in depth are subject to approval by the planning direczer, based on review and recommendation from the public works department relative to the existing and future traffic volumes and right-of-way requirements as specified in the city comprehensive transportation plan and city construction standards . b . Side yard. Minimum side yard is five (5 ) feet . C . Rear yard. Minimum rear yard is eight (8 ) feet . d. Side yard on flanking street of corner lot. Minimum side yard on the flanking street of a ccrner lot is fifteen (15) feet . 5 . F.eignt limitation. Eeicht limitations are as follows : a ._ SR-2 : Two and one-half (2 1/2) s�.cries, not exceeding thirty-five (3S) feet . b , _ _^SR-3 : Two and one-half (2 1/2) stories, not exceeding thirty-five (35) feet . C . r_ 9 . ^ER-4 . 5_ Two and one-half (2 1/2 ) stories , not exceeding- thirty-five (35 ) feet . s` , d , _ , . SR-6 : Twe and one-half (2 1/2) stories , not exceeding thirty-five (35) feet . 13 e . r � . �SR-8 : Two and one-half (2 1/2) stories , not exceeding thirty (30) feet . 6 . Interior yards. Interior yards shall not be computed as part of the site coverage . 1; 7 . Additional standards. See chapter 15 . 08 , i pertaining to general and supplementary provisions, for requirements concerning accessory buildings and additional standards; provided that solar access setback requirements of sections 15 . 08 . 230 through 15 . 08 . 234 shall not apply to the R1-5 . 0 zone . 8 . maxi-mum impervious surface coverage. Maximum impervious surface overages are as follows : a .- __ :CSR-2 : Forty (40) percent . b . Fifty (50) percent . C . r_ 9 . 'SR-4 5 : Sixty (60) percent . d. R_ , . �SR-6 : Seventy (70) percent . e . Seventy-five (75) percent . f . Except for lots used for agricultural practices, the maximum impervious surface area allowed s-all be ten thousand (10 , 000) square feet . 9 . Zero lot line and clustering. Minimum lot width, building setbacks, and minimum lot size regulations may be modified consistent with provisions for zero lot line and clustering housing development . I . Signs. The sign regulations of chapter 15 . 06 shall apply. J. offstreet parking. The offstreet parking regulations of chapter 15 . 05 shall apply. K. Development plan review. Development plan review is required when the property to be developed is classified as view property. SECTION 7. Section 15 . 04 . 030 of the Kent City Code is hereby amended to read as follows : Sec . 15 . 04 . 030 . Duplex multifamily residential district, I -D . 14 �1 It is the purpose of the MR-D district to provide for a limited increase in population density and allow for a treater variety of housing types by allowing duplex dwelling units . A. Principally permitted uses. Principally permitted uses are as follows : 1 . One (1) single-family dwelling per lot . 2 . One (1) duplex per lot . 3 . Group homes class I-A and I-E . e . Crop and tree farming. B . Special permit uses. The following uses are permitted provided that they conform to the development standards listed in section 15 . 08 . 020 : 1 . Churches . 2 . Nursery schools and day care centers . C . Accessory uses. Permitted accessory uses are as follows : 1 . Accessory uses and buildings customarily appurtenant to a permitted use, such as garages, carports and minor structures for storage of personal property. 2 . Roomina and boarding of not more than three (3 ) persons . 3 . Customary incidental home occupations subject to the provisions of section 15 . 08 . O40 . 4 . Accessory dwelling units . For purposes of this section. Section 15 . O4 _ 030 . accessory dwelling units shall not he included in calculating the maximum permitted densitv. D . Conditional uses . Conditional uses are as follows : 1 . General conditional uses listed in section 15 . 08 . 030 . 2 . Group homes class I-C, II-A, II-E and II-C . E . Development standards For single family dwellings , ' the maximum permitted density and development standards of Section 15 . O4 . 020 relating to SR-E zoning districts shall apply. 1 . M_inimum lot . Minimum lot area is as follows : a . Single-family dwellings : Fifty-seven hundred (5 , 700) square feet . 15 b. Duplex (two-family dwelling unit) : Eight thousand five hundred (8 , 500) square feet . 2 . Minimum lot width. Minimum lot width is as • follows : a . Single-family dwelling: Fifty (50) feet . i (1) To determine minimum lot width for irregular lots, a circle of applicable diameter (the minimum lot width i permitted) shall be scaled within the proposed boundaries of the lot , provided that an access easement to another lot is not included within the circle . b . Duplex: Eighty (80) feet . 3 . MaX?mum Site coverage. Maximum site coverage is as follows : a . single-family dwelling : Fifty (50) percent . b . Duplex: Forty (40) percent . C . Mjrinn n yard require-7eznts. a . Front yard. Minimum front yard is ten (10) feet . (1) At least twenty (20) feet of driveway shall be provided between any garage, carport or other primary parking area and the street property line with the exception of an alley property line . (2) Porches and private and shared courtyard features may be built within the front building setback line . (3 ) Proposed front yards less than twenty (20) feet in depth are subject to approval by the planning director, based on review and recommendation from the public works department relative to the existing and future traffic volumes and right-of-way requirements as specified in the city comprehensive transportation plan and city construction standards . b. Side yard. Minimum side yard is five (5) feet . lE i i c . Rear yard. Minimum rear yard is eight (a ) feet . d. Side yard on flanking street of corner lot. Minimum side yard on the flanking street of corner lot is fifteen (15) feet . i ! 5 . Height limitation. The height limitation is two i and one-half (2 1/2) stories, not exceeding thirty-five (35) feet . 6 . Interior yards . Interior yards shall not be computed as part of the site coverage . 7 . Additional standards. See chapter 15 . 08 , • 1-ertaining to general arse supplementary provisions, for rQ s euirement concerning accessory additional and dditional s andGrds . S . Maxi-mum impervious surface cove'_"aQE. Mayimuffi imre7ious surface is seventy (70) perce= O- the i'-, total lot area . a . Except for lots used for agricultural practices, the maximum impervious surface area allowed shall be ten thousand (10 , 000) square feet when the lot is greater than one (1) acre . b . Porches and private and shared courtyard features may be built within the front building setback line . 9 . Zero Iot line and clustering. Minimum lot width, building setbacks , and minimum lot size regulations may be modified consistent with provisions for Zero lot line and clustering hoL'sina development. ..- . F . Signs . The sign regulations of chapter 15 . 06 Shall apply. G. Offstreet parking. The offstreet parking rea-uirements of chapter 15 . 05 shall apply. F. Development plan review. Development plan review is required when the property to be developed is classified as view property. 17 I i SECTION S . Section 15 . 04 . 040 , of the Kent City Code is :ihereby amended to read as follows : Sec . 15 . 04 . 040 . Garden density multifamily residential district, MR-G. It is the purpose of the MR-G district to provide locations for garden apartment densities suitable for suburban living. A. Principally permitted uses. Principally permitted uses are as follows : 1 . Single-family dwellings and two-family dwellings or duplexes . 2 . Multiple-family dwellings, including apartments and townhouses . 3 . Group homes class I-A and I 4 . Crop or tree farming_ B . Special permit uses. The following_ uses are permitted provided that they conform to the development standards listed in section 15 . 08 . 020 : 1 . Churches . 2 . Nursery school and day care centers . C . Accessory uses. Permitted accessory uses are as follows : 1 . Accessory uses and buildings customarily appurtenant to a permitted use, such as garages , carports and minor structures for storage of personal property. 2 . Rooming and boarding of not more than three (3 ) persons . 3 . Customary incidental home occupations subject to the provisions of section 15 . 08 . 040 . 4 . offices incidental and necessary to the conduct of a principally permitted use . S . Accessory dwelling units . For ouruoses of this section Section 15 . 04 . 040 , accessory dwelling units shall not be included in calculating the maximum permitted density. D . Conditional uses. Conditional uses are as follows : 1 . General conditional uses as listed in section 15 . 08 . 030 . 12 �I I 2 . Group homes class I-C, II-A, II-E and II-C . E . Development standards. 1 . Single-family dwellings and duplexes. For single- family dwellings and - -- the maximum permitted densitv and development standards of ;i section 15 . 04 . 020 relating to SR-8 zoning districts shall anoly and for duplexes , the maximum nermitted density and development standards of section 15 . 04 . 030 shall apply. 2 . Multifamily dwelling a=its. The following shall a-:,-ply to multifamily dwelling units : a . Minimum lot. Minimum lot area is eight thousand five hundred (8 , 500) square feet for the first two (2) dwelling units , and two thousand five hundred (2 , 500) square feet for each additional dwelling unit . b . M_inimum lot widen. Minimum lot width is eighty (80) fe=_t . C . Density. Maximum density is sixteen (16) - dwelling units per acre . d. Maximum site coverage. Maximum site coverage is forty-five (45) percent . e . Minimum yard requirements. (1) Front yard. Minimum front yard is twenty (20) feet . (2) Side yard. Each side yard shall be a minimum of ten (10) percent of the lot width; however, regardless of lot width, the yard width need not be more than thirty (30) feet . (3) Rear yard. Minimum rear yard is twenty (20) feet . (4) Side yard on flanking street of corner lot. Minimum side yard on the flanking street of a corner lot is fifteen (15) feet . f . Distances between buildinas . 19 ii I (1) P-n inner court providing access to a double-row building shall be a minimum of twenty (20) feet . (2) The distance between principal buildings shall be at least one-half the sum of i! the height of both buildings ; provided, however, that in no case shall the distance be less than twelve (12 ) feet . This requirement shall also apply to portions of the same building separated from each other by a court or other open space . g. Landscaping. The landscaping requirements of chapter 15 . 07 shall apply. h. 1--eight limitation. The height limitation is three (3 ) stories, not exceeding forty (40) • fe�� . i . Additional standards . See chapter 15 . 06 , Fertai ninc to general and Supplementary provisions, for requirements concerning - accessory buildings and additional standards . Mu1 ti fa-nily transition areas . The re cuirements of section 15 . 08 . 215 shall apply in any multifamily transition area, which includes any portion of a multifamily district within one hundred (100) feet of a single-family district or within one hundred (100) feet of a public street right-of-way. k. h_fultifa_,nily design review. The requirements of section 15 . 09 . 04-7 shall apply to any multifamily dwelling of three (3) or more units . F . Signs. The sign regulations of chapter 15 . 06 shall apply- G . Offstreet parking. 1 . The off-street parkine requirements of chapter 15 . 05 shall apply. 2 . Offstreet parking may be located in required yards except for the frcnt ten (10) feet abutting any 20 public right-of-way, which must be landscaped. No off street parking is permitted in the re wired open green area. H. Development plan review. Development plan review is required as provided in section 15 - 09 . 010 . SECTION 9. Section 15 . 0,� . 050 of the Kent City Code is :: hereby amended to read as follows : Sec. 15 . O4 . 050 . Medium density multifamily residential district, MR-M. - It is the purpose of the MR-m district to provide for locations for medium density residential districts suitable for urban-suburban living. A. Principally permitted uses. Principally permitted uses are as follows : 1 . Single-family dwellings and two-family dwellings or duplexes . 2 . Multiple-family dwellings . 3 . Group homes class I-P -B and I-C. 4 . Crop and tree farming. B . Special permit uses . The following uses are permitted provided that they confor-M to the development standards listed in section 15 . 08 . 020 : 1 . Churches . 2 . Nursery schools and Gay Care centers . C. pCCESSOry uses. Permitted accessory uses are as follows : 1 . Accessory uses and buildings customarily appurtenant tO a permitted use, such as caraces, Carports or minor structures for storage of personal property. 2 . Rooming and boarding of not more than threes (3 ) persons . 3 . Customary incidental home occupations subject to the .provisicns of section 15 . 08 . 040 . � . offices incidental and necessary to the conduct of a permitted use . D . Conditional uses . Conditional uses are as follows : 2i 1 . General conditional uses as listed in section 15 . 08 . 030 . 2 . Group homes class II-A, II-E and II-C. E. Development standards. !i 1 . Single-family dwellings and duplexes. For single- family dwellings G___.-. ..r___ __4 d f -, the maximum i permitted density and development standards of section 15 . 04 . 020 relatina to SR-8 zonincr districts shall anciv and for duplexes , the maximum permitted density and development standards of. section 15 . 04 . 030 shall apply. 2 . Multifamily dwelling units. The following shall apply to multifamily dwelling units : a. Minimum lot. Minimum lot are.=_. is eight thousand five hundred (6 , 500) sduare feet for the first two (2) dwelling units, and one thousand six hundred (1, 600) square feet for each additional dwelling unit . b. Minimum lot width. Minimum lot width 1s eighty (80) feet . C . Density Maximum density is twenty-three (23 ) dwelling_ units per acre . d. Maximum site coverage. Maximum site coverage is forty-five (45) percent . e Minimum yard requirements. (1) Front yard. Minimum front yard is twenty (20) feet . (2) Side yard. Each side yard shall be a minimum cf ten (10) percent of the lot width; however, regardless of lot width, the yard width need not be more than thirty (30) feet . (3 ) Rear yard. Minimum rear yard is twenty (20) feet . (4) Side yard on flanking street of corner lot. Minimum side yard on the flanking street of a corner ict is fifteen (15) feet . f . Distances between buildings . 22 i (1) P-n inner cou= Drovidina access to a double-row building shall be a minimum of twenty (20) feet . (2) The distance between principal buildings shall be at least one-half the sum of the height of both buildings ; provided, I however, that in no case shall the distance be less than twelve (12 ) feet . i This requirement shall also apply to portions of the same building separated from each other by a court or other open • space . C. Landscaping. The landsCaping requirements of chapter 15 . 07 shall apply. h. Heiaht limitation. The height limitation is three (3 ) stcrles , ncz: exceeding forty (40) fee,. . i . F_dciticnal s-,=dards- See chapter 15 . 08 , pertaining to general and sllpplementary provisions , for re'—.—ements Concerning accessory buildings and additional standards . J . Multifamily transition areas. The reg_uirem=_nts of section 15 . 08 . 215 shall apply in any multifamily transition area, which includes any portion of a multifamily district within one hundred (100) feet o- a single-family district or within one hundred (100) feet of a public street right-of-way. k. Multifammily design review. The reauirements cf section 15 . 09 . 0g7 shall apply to any multifamily dwelling of three (3 ) or more units . F . Signs. The sign reaulat_cns of chapter 15 . 06 s:_all apply. G. Offs tree t parking. 1 . The of-street parking recuirements of chapter 15 . 05 shall apply. 2 . Offstreet parking may be located in required yards , except for the front ten (10) feet abutting . 23 any public right-of-way, which must be landscaped. j No offstreet parking is permitted in the required open green area . H. Development plan review. Development plan review is required as provided in section 15 . 09 . 010 . d SECTION 10. Section 15 . O4 . 060 of the Kent City Code is .; hereby amended to read as follows : ! Sec. 15 . 04 . 060 . High density multifamily residential district, MR-H. - It is the purpose of the MR-H district to provide for locations for high density residential districts suitable for urban living . A. Principally permitteal uses. Principally permitted uses are as follows : 1 . single-family dwellings and two-family dwellings or durlexes . 2 . Multiple-family dwellings . 3 . Group homes class I-A, I-E and I-C. 4 . Crop and tree farming. B . .Special pe-":i1f t use5 . The following uses are permitted provided that they conform to the development standards listed in section 15 . 08 . 020 . (No uses presently listed. ) C. Accessory uses . Permitted accessory uses are as follows : 1 . Accessory uses and buildings customarily appurtenant to a permitter use, such as carages, carzcrts or minor structures for storage of personal property. 2 . Roaming and bcardina of not more than three_ (3 ) persons. 3 . Customary incidental home occupations subject to the provisions of section 15 . 08 . 040 . 4 . offices incidental and necessary to the conduct of a permitted use . 24 �i 5 . Accessory dwelling units . For Durposes of this section Section 15 . 04 . 060 , accessory dwelling units shall not be included in calculating.- the maximum permitted density. i D . Conditional uses. Conditional uses are as follows : i 1 . General conditional uses as listed in section 15 . 08 . 030 . 2 . Group homes class II-A, II-E and II-C. E . Development standards . 1 . Single-family dwellings and duplexes. For single- family dwellings _� _ the maximum • permitted density and-development standards of section 15 . 04 . 020 relating to SR-8 zoning districts shall anciy and for Cuulexes , the maximum Dermltted den=_itv and CeyeloDmeP_t standards of section 15 . 05 . 030 shall apply. 2 . A_Ul t i fa nily dwelling units. The fcllowi nC_ shall apply to multifamily dwelling units : a . r?_nimum lot . Minimum lot area is eicht thousand five hundred (8 , 500) seuare feet for the first two (2) dwelling units , and nine hundred (900) square feet for each additional dwelling unit . b . Min?mum lot width. Minimum lot width is eighty (80) feet . C . Density. Maximum density is forty (40) dwelling units per acre . d. Maximum site coverage. Maximum site coverage is fifty (50) percent . e . Minimum yard requirements . (1) Front yard. Minimum _rout yard is twenty (20) feet . (2) Side yard. Each side yard shall be a minimum of ten (10) .ercent of the lot width; however, regardless of lot width, the yard width need not be more than thirty (30) feet . (3 ) Re_= yard. Minimum rear yard is twenty (20 ) fee'- . 25 i { (S) side yard on flanking street of corner lot. Minimum siae yard on the flanking street of a corner lot is fifteen (15) feet . f . Distances between buildings. (1) An inner court proviaing access to a double-row building shall be a minimum of twenty (20) feet . (2) The distance between principal buildings shall be at least one-half the sum of the height of both buildings ; provided, however, tha.. in no case shall the distance be less than twelve (1 2) feet . This requirement shall also anpiv to portions of the same building separated from eacn ct__- by a court or Other cDen space . g. Landscaping. The laP_dscaping requirements of Granter 15 . 0 / sisal! apply. h. 1-.eiCT22t limitation. The height limitation is fou- (,�) stories, net exceeding fifty (50) f e , . i . z ddi t i cnal s tandariS. S e e chapter 1 5 . 0 8 , pertaining to ue_^.eral and supplementary provisions, for re—.direments Concerrin aCCessory bulldires and additional standards . � . Yultiramily transition areas. The requirements of section 15 . 08 . 215 shall apply in any multifamily transition area, which includes any portion of a multifamily district within one hundred (100) feet of a single-family di-stricz O- within one hundred (100) feet of a public street right-of-way. k. Multifamily design review. The requirements of section 15 . 05 . 047 shall apply to any multifamily dwelling of three (3 ) or more units . F . Signs . The sign regulations of chapter 15 . 06 shall apply. 26 ii •i G. Offstreet parking. 1 . The off-street parking requirements of chapter 15 . 05 shall apply. 2 . Offstre=_t parking may be located in required yards, except for the front ten (10) feet abutting i any public right-of-way, which must be landscaped. No offstreet parking is permitted in the required open Green area. H. Development plan review. Development plan review is required as provided in section 15 . 09 . 010 . SECTION II . Zoninc Mar) Single Family Designations Emended . The City of Kent official zoning map is hereby amended by redesignating the zoning districts ccnslszent with the redeslgnation of zoning districts as set forth in this Ordinance as follows : Former Zone Current Zone R1-5 . 0 SR-8 R1-7 . 2_ SR-o' R1-9 . 6 SR-S . 5 R1-12 . 0 SR-3 R1-20 . 0 SR-2 RA SR-1 SECTION 12. Severahility. If any one or more sections , sub-sections , or sentences of this Ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect . . 27 ,i SECTION 13 . Effective Date . This Ordinance shall take `i effect and be in force five (5) days from and after its passage , i ;; approval and publication as provided by law. JI7/wI !TE Yj�=R ATTEST : ERENDA jACOBE.FJ, CI Y CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: 7 *Z-oviA. LU CITY ATTORNEY PASSED � day of APPROVED Z�f day of 11 P7JDLIS.14ED day of ��/Y/n r 1996 . U 28 `i I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No . �/�, passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, I Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the City of Kent as ; hereon indicated. _(sEzL) ERENDF JACOOEER, STY CLERK >So4G 29 ORDINANCE NO. G r AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent , Washinctcn, relating to single family residential design 5 ' standards amending j Chapter 15 . 04 of the i i G Zonng Code to establis-. s andards for minimum lot Widths , r.ini ._ street a setbacks , mcXlmllm bL1lG_r_c COveraCc, maximum imDe--vices sllrf:aCe coverage, drivewav dim=-nsicns, a: d r.i ni mium lot size . GU' ^� W'r_ER=AS , the City cf K_-it Comrrehensive Plan ccntdi7_s COdl G:'_C p01_CleS Wn_C__ --_:_:,Ors a vari=�v C yl �� housing types and densities trroucr_cut the City, including u-� � GG � rr.cre single-family than multifam_ly residential Cevelcpme_nts , mcre f1eX-billtV and -- --ova-- cn 1R terms 0- r'u-_:Ina and s__ de=ian and _ sid '__al Se racks ; acid GJ Wr_ RE S , the City of Kent Ccmprehersive Pla-! contains goals and DClicies which r mri'Lend excansion Cf home ownercpip eDDertll:__ti es rCr all inceCPe Croups ; and J�V - W=EF.S, the City of Ke= Ccmprehensive Plan ccntains aeals and pclicies which r--c=Lmend a revised calculaticn system for determinin-- ma:timum allowable sinale fa:.—J ly density; and the Citv of Kent Ccr,.prehe-_sive Plan ccntai ns COals and Policies which reccmmend preteCticn of t:e C1a1i --V and C'1a_ntity of CrCL:__^:d xa7�er used for public wale_ storr l i es ; a-d - WHEREAS, revised Kent Zc :_-:c Code provisions for single family residential dens_tie_ an development standards , consistent with the above coals and policies , have been prepared and reviewed, teceth=_r with public comments obtained at two public hearings conducted by the Kent Planning Commission, and recommended for adoption by the Planning Commission and the City Council Planning Committee ; and WHEREAS , pursuant to RCW = c" . 70A. 120 , the Grcwth Management Act requires that jurisdictions enact development regulations which are consistent with and imDlement the 1 Comprehensive F R Flat; NOW, THE -r70 _ �)r_C , CITY COLTdCII, OF THE C � OF K=NT, W__ __NGTON, DOES HERESY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS : SECTION I . Subsection (F) cf, Section 15 . 04 . 005 is hereby amended as follows : Sec . 15 . 04 . 005 . Agricultural district, A-1. The stated coal of the city is tC preserve pre :e acrlcultural land in the Green River valley as a nonrenewable resource . The agriCL'1tL:re zone shall actively encourage the concentration of aCriC"Mural uses _ areas where incompatibility with urban uses will be minimal to aid in the lmcleme__^_tation of those coals . Further, classification of prime agricultural land thus recognizes and enccu'races farming activity as a Viable sector cf the local ecencmv. A. Principally permitted us e=. Principally permitter uses are as follows : 1 . Agricultural uses , including any customary agricultural buildinc cr structure , such as planting, cultivaticn and harvesting of crops, animal husbandry, nurseries and greenhouses and other agricultural occupations . 2 . One (1) single-family dwelling per lot . 3 . Grcuo homes class I-A. Special permit uses. The following• uses are permitted provided that they conform to the development standards lis7i_d in section 15 . 08 . 020 : 1 . Churches . 2 . Nursery schools a-tea da_T care centers . C. Acccesacry uses. Fermlt-erd accessory uses are as follows : 1 . Guest cottages not rented or otherwise conducted as a bus_neSS . 2 . Acccmmcdatlons fo' far.i, cceratcrs and employees , but not accommodations for transient l aoc r. 3 . Roadside stands not e_tceedina four hundred (400 ) square feet in floor area, and not over twenty (20) lineal feet on any side, primarily for e sale of agricultural products on the premises . 4 . Customary incidental home occupations subject to the provisicns of sectior. 15 . 08 . 040 . 5 . Other accessory uses and buildings customarily appurtenant to a permitted use . 6 . For permitted uses, hazardous substance land uses , including cnsite hazardous waste treatment or storage facilities, which are not subject to cleanup permit requirements of charter 11 . 02 and do not accumulate more than twenty thousand (20 , 000) pounds of hGzardous substances or wastes or any combination thereof at any one ( 1) time on the site, subject to the previsions of sectior. 15 . 08 . 050 , excect effs_te hazardous waste treatment or storac= facilities, which are net permitted =_n this district . D . Cor2dicicnal uses. Conditional uses are as follows : 1 . General conditional uses as listed in section 15 . 08 . 030 . 2 . For permitted uses , accessory hazardous substance land uses wh-ch are not subject to cleanup permit re uirements of chanter 11 . 02 and which accumulate more than twenty thousand (20 , 000) pounds of hazardous substances or wastes or any combination thereof at any one (1) time cn the site , subject to the provisions of sectior. 15 . 08 . 050 , except cf=site hazardous waste treatment or storage facilities , which are r_Ct permitted In tl'._S di stricz . 4 E . Development standar-'s . 1 . Minimum lot . Minimur, lot area is one = ; thirty four thcusanC seven hundred sQuar= feet (34 , 700 ) . SECTION 2. Subsection (E-) (2) of Section 15 . 04 . 005 is hereby amended as follows : 2 . Minimum Ic.t wict isinimum lot width is e=e L - - Cixtv (�C ) feel. a . To determine miniTum lot width for irrecular lots = circle of anolicahle diamet=r r r .- imam, lct width c=,itt,d1 S'a__ Ce Scab i hi n re F- - ea w_t_ t' nrcocsed hcuncL-r__s cf the lot , n-cv= d-d that an aGcesS -=SeT ^_ tO another lot is not includ=; w_thin tre circles 3 . Maximum Site ccvera L7e. %Tax -Ium site ccverace is thirty (30 ) perc-_t . SECTION 3 . Subsection (=) (4 ) of Section 15 . 04 005 is hereby amended as follows : 4 . Minimun yard recuir -e_ts . a . Front yard. Mil—imium front yard is twenty (20) feet . (1) PGr.ches an.^ nrivate shared ccur`_Vnr;. _e:�:,_res may Le w_t}- i n f- to 7 nC se- tac'r l i n o G ID . Side yard. Mini'. ,um side yard is fifteen (15) feet . C . Rear yard_ Pni n' m rear yard is twenty (20) feet . d. Side yard or flanking street of corner lot. Minimum side yard on the flanking street of G garner lot s twenty (20) feet . 5 . F?eiaht limitat on. T_.e height limitation is two and one-half (2 1/2) stories , not exceeding thirty-_l e (35 ) feet . T'e height limitations shall rc- ati,lly to barns and silos provided thG- tnCy are n0 l =ed w i tn�n r_r�v (5ul c any to l_n 6 . Add ticnGl st-ndGrc . G Sl.rllc'..urC f�- ng, hcu__r_g and eGrC of animals exc-cz hcusehcld pets , shall be set back fi--_J (50) feet from any property line . b. gee chapter 15 . OS , perzaininc to general and supnlemen wry previsions , for requirements concerning accessory buildings and additional s a-dardS . C . The following uses are prchibited : (1) The remcval cf topsoil fcr any purpose . (2 ) Grade and fill operations , provided that limited trade and fill may be azoroved as needed to construct buildir_cs or structures as outlined in subsections 15 . O4 . 005 A. , B . , C . G--'i D . (3 ) All subsurface activities , including excavation for und==Ound utilities , pire_ines cr other undercround installations , that cause permanent disrurtion of the surface of the land . Tem. -perar-_v disrupted soil sllrfaces snail he in a m'.Gnn=r cC=SiSten- with aGricultural uses . (4 ) Dumping or storace of ncnacricult,�ral sclid or liquid waste, or cf trash, rubbish or r_cxious materials . (5 ) Activities tha_ violate sound acricultural soil and Water c cn s e r V a t l-c n man ac eme n L p ra c t i s eS . SECTION 4 _ Subsection (-) of Section 15 . O4 . 005 is her bV amended by addinc a new subsection (7) as follows : 7 . YaxiTu_ Smce_"yious su=r -ace cOTieraae . Max4mum i mreri c s surface cay=_`"ace is CD°S of the total parcel area. a _:CO�rt For 1c- c us=j for ac-ricultu'ral rracti('es t_^_e surface area allowed shall be ten thousand (10 . 000) scuare feet when the lot is treater than one acre . SECTION 5. Subsection (E) of Section 15 . 04 . 005 is hereby amended by adding a new subsection (8 ) as follows : 8 . Zero lot line and clustering. Minimum lot width buildint setbacks and minimum lot size recualtions may be mod-fled consistent with provisions for Zero lot line and clustering housing development . F . Signs. The sicn regulations of chapter 15 . 06 s-_all apply. C. C'-Lstreet p'arklnC. The off-street, parking requirements of chap:er 15 . 05 shall apply. SECTION 6. Subsection (--- ) of Section 15 . 04 . 010 is her=-ov amended as follows : Sec. 15 . 04 . 010 . Residential agricultural district, RA. The city has , through its RA and MA zones, the key to assuring efficient and attractive Growth. It is essential that the city avoid excessive zoning far in advance of demand. Rezoning of RA and M; lands to more intensive use shall be predicated upon the documentation of the need fer additional residential, commercial or industrial land in the city. This documentation shall consist of a fiscal impact analysis showing that the other lands already zoned and accessible to mun4cical services are not sufficient or suitable to accommodate demand for the proposed uses and that the market demand for the prOpCsed development is sufficient to cenerate the revenues necessary to prcvi municipal services, including but not limited tc fire, streets , water, drainage and sewer, .e uir by the project . A. Principally uses. Principally permitted uses G r e a.s.. L c l l ow s : 1 . Agricultural uses, including any customary agricultural huildi _c or structure, such as planting, cultivat_On and harvesting of crops , animal hus.'andry, nurseries and greenhcuses and CC Er agricultural o c=DGLi cns . 2 . one (1) si-cle-fa:n-ly dwelling per lc- . 3 . Croup homes class I-A. B . eci al pe=i t useS . The following uses are permiteed provided that _--ey ccnfcrm to tie develcpment standar s l== =a in secticn 15 . CE . C20 : 1 . Churches . 2 . Nursery s.-hccis and gay care centers . C. Pccesscry uses. Permitted accessory uses are as fellows : 1 . Guest cottages not renter or ctherwi se ccndu,c:ea as G 1 y us _tress . G 2 . Accommodations for farm operators and employees , but nct accommodations for transient labor. 3 . Roadside stand not exceeding four hundred (400) square feet in floor area, and not over twenty (20) lineal feet on any side, primarily for the sale of agricultural products grown on t:.e premises . 4_ . CL'stcmary incidental home occupations subjec7. to the provisions c= section 15 . 08 . 040 . 5 . Other accessory uGe_ and buildings c L:stomarily to a permitted uEe, except for cnslte waste treatment and s zc rage f a c_1_ _-_ , wn_C n a r e not permitted in reside-_tial zones . D. Ccna_ t?onal uses. Cendi-_ -cnal uses are as follows : gee^oral conditional uses aS listed in sec..ion 15 . 08 . 030 . fevelcoment st=- dard . 1 . Z_nimum lot. Mini mum lot area is ._._�. thirty four thcusa_- = seven hundre (34 , 700) =ware feet--- . SECTION 7. Subsection (-) (2) of Section 15 . 04 . 010 is hereby amended as follows : 2 . N_nimum lot weft:: . . ._..imum Jot width i s C Ejx7:V (G0) feet . n a . To determine m_--4 mum lct width far irreaular lct G Circle cf aD�1lCable diameter (the minimum lct width permitted) shall be scaled within the pronosed boundaries of the lct , provided that an access easement to another lct is not includ d within the circle . 3 . Maximum site covera:7e . Maximum site Coverage iC thirty (30 ) i=c t . SECTION S. subsection (=) (S ) cf Secticn 15 . C4 . O10 is hereby amen ed as follows : l�-r_imum yard a . Front yard. M- -:um front yard _4S twenty (20) feet. . (1) Porches - nr_va`e and s� - ccu=,,iar -__- = may = t b . Side yard. Min -,�m s-cam yarn 11_ e_n (15) feet . C . R==r yard. V1�___%,'_:.� rear yara is twenty (2C) feet . d . Side yard cn f=a..k_4na street cf ccrne- :v arc Cn t _ __cn.{_ _ street cf a earn__- !cc: 1s twenty (2C) =or 5 . Height limitation . The height limitation is two and one-half (2 1/2) stories , not exceeding thirty-five (35 ) feet . 6 . Additional standards. a . Structures for feeding, housing and care of animals , except household pets , shall he set hack fifty (50 ) feet from any property line . b. See chapter . 08 , pertaining to gcner"l and supplementary provisions , for yr,eculreme: t✓s concerning accessory bulldln_gs and Gdd_t1Cnal t:nda rds . SECTION 9 . Subsection (-) of Section- 1 . 0q . 010 is hereby amended by adding a new subsection_ (7) as follows : 7 . Max_ num imcervious s r-ac_ coverage Max_mu-n im—.e'_"yicus 8'ur=aC= CC'ic_- _ iS CG O- Lnc total r a r C e l G r=.= a . Excent nor 11c_�tS used for Gg u rlclturu! practices . the maximum 1mcer-111d11S surf I a arc.= a11c Wed Sna I be ten thousand (10 . 000) scuare feet wne n tre lot 1c cre=tar than Cnc acr= SECTION 10. Subsection (E) of Se^_ticn 15 . 04 . 010 is herebv amended by adding a new subsectior_ (8 ) as fellows : 8 . Zero lot line and ClL'Ste_"1?=C. M'nlmu.i, lot width , bll_l Yi g S? aC.'{S , and m1^=mi1m JC- Size r?cua S n' e m0dlf led CCns.Stsnit i 7 with provisions for zero lot line and clustering housing development . F . Signs. The sign regulations of chapter 15 . 06 shall apply- G. Offstreet parking. The offstreet parking requirements of chanter 15 . 05 shall apply. H. Development plan review. Development plan review is required when the property to be developed is classified as view property. SECT-TON 11 . Subsection (A) of Section 15 . 04 . 020 is hereby amended as follows : Sec. 15 . 04 . 020 . Single-family residential districts . it is the purpose of the single-family residential districts to stabilize and preserves low density, single- family residential neighborhoods . it is further the purpcs- to provide a range of minimum lot sizes in order to promote_ diversity and recognize a variety of residential environments . E. Districts established by lot area. The following single-family residential districts are established: 1 . R1-20 : Vwerwiy __ __�nd Sixteen / trous= (16 . 00C ) square feet minimum lot area . 13 2 . Ri-12 . de_ :e t_heuca:d _ Ninety six hundred ( 9 , 600 ) sauare feet minimum lot area . 3 . Ri-9 . 6 . seventy six hundred (7 , 600) square feet minimum lot area . 4 . R1-7 . 2 . t e h _dE.ze -- Fifty seven hundred ( 3 , 700) square feet minimum lot area . 5 . R1-5 . 0 : . th : .e 1 S0 -Four thousand: (4 , 000) sauare feet minimum lot area . L E . Minimmum zoning area • Mini um zoning area 'or the R1-5 . 0 district is fifteen thousand (15 , 000) sauare feet (three (3 ) lots) C. Maximum zoning area. Maximum zcninq area for the Ri-5 . 0 district is eight (8) acres . D. principally permitted uses . Principally permitted uses are as follows : 1 . One (1) sinale-family dwelling per lot . 2 . Crop and tree farming . 3 . Croup homes class I-A. E . Special permit uses. The following uses are permitted provide: they conform to the develcpment standards listed in section 15 . 08 . 020 : 1 . Churches . 14 2 . Nursery schools and day care centers . P . accessory uses. Permitted accesscry uses are as follcws : 1 . Accessory uses and buildings customarily appurtenant to a permitted use, such as garages, carports and minor structures for storage of personal property. 2 . Rooming and boarding of not more than three (3 ) persons . 3 . Customary incidental home occupaticns subject to the provisions of secticn 15 . 08 . 0g0 . G . Ccnditional uses. Ccndit_enal uses are as follcws : G=neral conditional uses as listed in section 15 . 08 . 030 . SECTION 12. Subsection (H) of Section 15 . 04 . 020 is hereby amended as follcws : E. Develcoment standards. 1 . T?1n?111L'ZI lot. Minimum lOt area is as follows : a . Rl-20 � to en thousand (1 . 000 ) square feet . b . R1-12 : thiei:iea-a Ninety sic hundred (9 , 600 ) square feet . 15 c . R1-9 . 6 : - - Swenty six hundred (7 , 600) square feet . d. R1-7 . 2 : S- t'_:c_s_nd we hu_d_cd , 200` Fifty seven hundred (5 , 700) square feet . e . R1-5 . 0 : i :s t`c�s_nd Four thousand (4 , 000) square feet . SECTION 13 . Subsecticn (H) (2 ) of Section 15 . 04 . 020 is hereby amended as fcllcws : 2 . Minimum lot width. Minimum lot width is as follows : a . R1-20 : Fifty (50) feet . b . R1-12 : .___`1 Fifty (50) feet . C . R1-9 . 6 : Fiftv (50) feet . d . R1-7 . 2 : en— Fifty (50) feet . e . R1-5 . 0 : l_'^ Forty (40) feet . f . To determine minimum lot width for irregular lots , a circle of aoolicable diameter (the minimum lot width bermitted) shall be scaled within the orccosed bcundaries of the lot , orovided that a_i accesS easement to another lot is not included within the circle . i5 SECTION 14 . Subsection (-i) (3 ) of Section 15 . 04 . 020 is hereby amended as follows : 3 . Maximum site coverage. Maximum site coveraae is as follows : a . R1-20 : Thirty (30) percent . b . R1-12 : hi-t1 Forty five (45 ) percent . C . 7-1-9 . 6 : Forty five (ai) percent . d . R1-7 . 2 . _---- ;- - % Fifty (50 ) percent . e . R1-5 . 0 : _ - 1 ' ^ Fifty five (55) percent . SECTION 15. Subsection (-) (4 ) of Section 15 . 04 . 020 if hereby amended as follows : 4 . M_inimum yard re-uire_Tents . a . Front yard. Minimum front yard is ., t e n ( G) -- _ i . At least 20 l ; ne=r feet of driv=wav shall he r-rovide3 between any caraae . carport or other urimary r.Jark na area and the stree! prcnerz:v line with the e-<^=Lt4 --7 or an allcy Lrccz=:y line . 17 2 . Forches and private and shared ceurtvard features may be built within the front buildina setback line . 3 . Proposed front vards less than twenty feet in denth are sublect to apprcval by the Plannina Director, based on review and recommendation from the Public works Department relative to the existing and future traffic volumes and right-of-wav requirements as specified in the s r_ nsJ City o K�"t Comp__he__�_ve Tran=pert=ticn Plan and City of Kent Ccns ructicn Standards . b . Side yard. Minimum side yard is five (5) feet . C . Rear yard. Minimum rear yard is eight (8 ) feet . d. Side yard on flanking street of Corner lot. Minimum side: yard on the flank-Ina street of a corner lot is fifteen (15) feet . 5 . Height limitation. Eeight limitations are as follows : a . R1-20 : Two and ore-half (2 1/2) stories , not exceeding thirty-five (35 ) feet . 18 b . R1-12 : Two and one-half (2 1/2 ) stories , not exceeding thirty-five (35 ) feet . C . R1-9 . 6 : Two and one-half (2 1/2 ) stories, not exceeding thirty-five (35) feet . d. R1-7 . 2 : Two and one-half (2 1/2) stories, not exceeding thirty-five (35) feet . e . R1-5 . 0 : Two and one-calf (2 1/2) stories, not exceeding thirty (30) feet . 6 . Interior yards. Interior yards Snell net be computed as part of the site cover=ce . 7 . Additional standards . See chapter 15 . 08 , pertaining to general and supplementary provisions , fcr recuirements ccncernina accessory buildings and additional standards ; provided that solar access setback requirements cf sections 15 . 08 . 230 throuan 15 . 08 . 234 shall not apply to the R1-5 . 0 zone . SECTION 16. Subsection (R) of Section 15 . 04 . 020 is hereby amended by adding a new subsection (8 ) as follows : S _ Ya_ximum i*ncervicus sur=ace coverage . Maximum =mlperyious c'ir act' c_-yeraaes are as fellows : a . R1-20 ; Fcrty (40 ) cerc=_nt . b . R1-12 ; Fi-ty ( 50 ) percent . 19 c . R1-9 . 6 ; Sixty (60) nercent . d . R1-7 . 2 ; Seventy (70) nercent . e . R1-5 . 0 ; Seventy five (75) percent . f . ExceDt for lots used for agricultural practices , the maximum imcervious surface area allowed shall be ten thousand (10 , 000 ) square feet . SECTION 17. Subsection O of Section 15 . 04 . 020 is hereby amended by adding a new subsection (9) as follows : 9 Zero lot line and clustering. Mir:_mum lot width, buildir_c setbacks , and minimum lot size regualtions may be modified consistent with urovisicns for zero lot line and clustering hcusincr aeye ooment . T . Signs. The sign regulations of chapter 15 . 06 shall apply. J. Offstreet parking. The offstreet parking regulations of chapter 15 . 05 shall apply. K. Development plan_ review. Development plan review is required when the property to be developed is classified as view prcperty. SECTION 18. Subsection (E-) of Section 15 . 04 . 030 is hereby amended as follows : Sec. 15 . 04 . 030 . Duplex multifamily residential district, MR- D. 20 It is the purpose of the MR-D district to provide for a limited increase in copulation density and allow for a greater variety of housing tyves by allowing duplex dwelling units . A. Principally permitted uses . Principally permitted uses are as follows : 1 . One (1) single-family dwelling per lot . 2 . One (1) duplex per lot . 3 . Group homes class I-A and I-B . 4 . Crop and, tree farming. B . Special pe=it uses. The following uses are permitted provided that they conform to the development standards listed in section 15 . 08 . 020 : 1 . Churches . 2 . Nursery schools and day care centers . C . Accessory uses. Permitted accessory uses are as follows : 1 . Accessory uses and buildings customarily appurtenant to a permitted use, such as garages, carports and minor structures for storage of personal Frcperty. 2 . Rooming and boarding of not more than three (- ) persons . 21 3 . Customary incidental home occupations subject to the provisions of section 15 . 08 . O40 . D. Conditional uses . Conditional uses are as follows : 1 . General conditional uses listed in section 15 . 08 . 030 . 2 . Group homes class I -C, II-E, II-B and II-C. E . Development standards. 1 . Minimum lot. Minimum lot area is as follows : a . Single-family dwellings : C -;e- -- -- Fifty seven hundred (5 , 700) scuare feet . b . Duplex (two-family dwelling unit) : Eight thousand five h..:ndred (8 , 500) scuare feet . SECTION 19. Subsection (E) (2) of Section 15 . O4 . 030 is hereby amended as follows : 2 . Minimum lot width. Minimum lot width is as follows : a. Single-family dwelling: Fifty (50) feet . 1 . To determine minimum lot width for irregular lots , a circle of aoolicable diameter (the minimum lot width nermitt=_^) shall be LZ scaled within the rreccsed boundaries of the lot , provided tha`_ an access easement to another lot is not included within the Ci role . b . Duplex: Eighty (80) feet . SECTION 20. Subsection (-7) (3 ) of Section 15 . 04 . 030 is hereby amended as fellows : 3 . Y-aximum site cevera e. Maximum site coverage is as follows : a . Single-family dwelling : Fifty (50 ) percent . b . Du-clex: Forty (40 ) percent . SECTION 21 . Subsecticc-, (E) (4) (a) of Section 15 . 04 . 030 is hereby amended as o'__i - -ws . 4 . N_rin_im m yard rem�_rements. a . Front yard. Minimum front yard is t =1 ten (10) feet . 1 . At least 20 feet of drivewav shall be rrovided between anv carace , Garrott or ether rrlmary rarkj1 a a rca a_^_C the rrcnerty line with the excert_en of an allev rrcnerty 1 i-e 23 2 . Porches and crivate and shared courtyard features may be built within the front building setback line . 3 . Proposed front vards less than twenty feet in depth are subject to approval by the Planning Director . based on review and recommendation from the Public works Department relative to the existing and future traffic volumes and right-cf-wav requirements -as specified in the City of Ke�-_t Transportation Plan and City of Kent construction standards . b. Side yard. Minimum side yard is five (5) feet . C . Rer yard. Min;-mum rear yard is eight (8 ) feet . d. Side yard on flanking street of corner lot. Minimum side yard on the flanking street of a corner lot is fifteen (15 ) feet . 5 . Height limitation_. The height limitation is two and one-half (2 1/2) stories, not exceeding thirty-five (35) feet . 6 . Intericr yards . Interior yards shall not be computed as part of the site coverage . 24 7 . Additional standards . See chapter 15 . 08 , pertaining to general and supplementary provisions , for re uirements ccncerning accessory buildings and additional .standards . SECTION 22. Subsection (E) of Section 15 . 04 . 030 is hereby amended by adding a new subsection (8) as follows : 8 . Maximum imnervious surface. Maximum imrervious surface is seventy (70) Dercent of the total lot area . a . Fxce--t For ictS used Lcr aori c--,7 tural rractices . the maximum imDer'vi--us surface are= a!lcweo s-=11 be ten thousand (10 , 000 u) sqare feet when the lot Z.S. greeter than one acre b . Porches and Dr'VG_- and S _ere^ courtyard features may b= huj1t witrjn the front building setback line . SECTION 23 . Subsection (E) of Section 15 . 04 . 030 is hereby amended by adding a new subsecticn (9) as follows : 9 Zero lot line and clustering. Minimum lot width, building setbacks , and minimum lot size reaualtions may be modified consistent with Drovisions for zero lot Line and clustering housing c=velcnment . F . Signs . The sign regulaticr= of canter 15 . Oo' shall aDgly. 25 G. Offstreet parking. The cffstreet parking requirements of chapter 15 . 05 shall apply. F. Development plan review. Development plan review is reduired when the property to be developed is classified as view property. SECTION 24 . Severability. If any section, sentence , clause or phrase of this ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase cf this ordinance . SECTION 25. Effective Date . This ordinance shall take effect and be 1n force thirty (30) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law. JC�IIwEITE, M_;=R ATTEST : - ERENDA JACOBER„•'CITY CLERK 26 , � CITY OF �'T _. Jim White, Mayor Planning Department (206) 859-3390/FAX(206) 350-2544 James P. Harris, Planning Director October 14. 1996 TO: STEVE DOWELL, CHAIR, LAND USE & PLANNING BOARD FROM: FRED N. SATTERSTROM, PLANNING MANAGER RE: PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING MAXIMUM PERMITTED DENSITY STANDARDS (gZCA-96-6) BACKGROUND During the Planning Board's August workshop, staff reviewed recent ordinances passed by the Kent Ciry Council relative to single family residential zoning. These ordinances, Ordinances 1M3268 and #3290, revised the development standards for single family zones and changed the titles of the zones from one based on lot size (such as RI-7200) to one based on a density factor (such as SR-6). Both of these ordinances are attached for your reference. Adopted in April 1995,the Kent Comprehensive Plan suggested changes to single family residential zoning regulations in order to allow for more flexibility in terms of building and site design, (SEE, specifically LU-10). Ordinances 43268 and 43290 were designed to accomplish this. Ordinance 4,3268 (December 1995) revised the development standards for single family zones by providing more flexibility for site design. For example, lot width, minimum lot size, and front yard setback standards were reduced while site coverage regulations were increased. Ordinance3290 (April 1996) further clarified 43268 by providing a "maximum permitted density", re-naming the single family zoning districts, and clarifying other minor aspects of single and multiple family zoning districts. The intent of these zoning changes was to permit greater flexibility in single family residential development in order to achieve comprehensive plan goals. As discussed at the August workshop, the implementation of Ordinance n3290 had an unanticipated, inhibitive effect on potential subdivision of"in-fill" lots. That is to say, lots which may have been subdivided under RI-12.0 zoning (for instance, a lot which was 24,000 sq. ft. in size) were prohibited from subdividing under the new SR-3 zoning. Under SR-3 zoning, over 28,700 sq. ft. are required in order to subdivide an additional lot. This inhibitive effect on subdivision seems to impact only in-fill lots which are generally less than an acre and where there are few, it any, requirements for dedication of land for roads or storm water purposes. Short or long plats which „ua011 cr__,n iiiv:, -�snl�rr��un�u,�.sso;; rel.l�.rn��i �_��HS,�.;;un,c�sn.:,�__;:a AMENDMENT TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTI.AL ZONING October 14, 1996 Page 2 involve dedications or reservations of land for roads and utilities are benefited by the amended zoning standards. ALTERNATIVES AND ACTIONS Based on the Board's discussion of issues at the workshop, it was agreed that some modification of regulations should be initiated in order to rectify the abovementioned problem. Staff was requested to research possible alternatives and return in workshop to the Land Use and Planning Board. 1. "Grandfatherina" ore-existing lots The Board had suggested some sort of"grandfather clause" be implemented for lots which previously could be subdivided under the "old" R1 zoning. According to the City Attorney's office, this option is not possible since zoning cannot be vested without a complete application for subdivision. Therefore, there is no valid way for the City to grandfather existing lots to previous zoning. 2. Chanee the "maximum permitted density" Ordinance #3290 specifies a maximum permitted density (MPD) for each single family residential zone. The MPD for the SR-2 zone is 2 unitsiacre, for SR-3 zone it is 3 units/acre, and so forth. These maximums are stated in Section 15.04.020 of the Kent Zoning Code; they represent rounded off numbers roughly equivalent to the previously RI-titled zones which were based on minimum lot size requirements. This alternative would convert the rounded off MPD's to mathematically precise numbers carried out to the first or second decimal. To illustrate: Zone Maximum permitted density SR-2 2.2 (2.18) SR-3 3.6 (3.63) SR-4.5 4.5 (4.53) SR-6 6.0 (6.05) SR-8 8.7 (8.71) Implementation of this alternative would give credit for fractions of an acre which may be critical in lot splits and other in-fill development situations where the size of the parent lot is generally less than an acre. AMENDMENT TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING October 14, 1996 Page 3 3. Do Nothing alternative Under this alternative, no changes would be made to the existing density standards of the single family zoning districts. THE NEXT STEP Following our discussion of this topic at the October 14, 1996 workshop, the Board will decide if it wishes to take this matter to a public hearing. If it does, the staff would suggest going to hearing as early as October 28, 1996. - ORDINANCE NO. 7 AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of I the City of Kent , Washington, relating to single family residential design QD standards amending Chapter 15 . 04 of the Zoning Code to establish standards for minimum lot widths, minimum street O setbacks, maximum building coverage, maximum imnervicus surface coverage , driveway dimensions, and minimum lot size . 00 5 0 W-HEREAS, the City of Kent Comprehensive Plan n C. Contains Coals and policies w_-_i ch S:.":__c_= a variety of l,� D housing types and aens_cies througnGut c: e City, includinc more single-family than multi-faml_v residential -, D developments , more flexibi l i ty and _nnGVatiOn 1n terms Oi I/ building and S__e design and resid_n_lal se--hacks ; and - W the City cf Kent Ccm__ rehtnsive Plan ' '- l i i (-„ c expansion f D con�a_ns coals and po_ic_es wh_ h re_^mm�nde c� J a� home ownership opportuniie-S for all _-come groups ; and WF = cEyS, the City of Ken_- Comprehensive Plan conta'__T15 Coals and policies whin recommend a revised Calculation syszem for deter=-'niP_C maX_mum allowable single family density; and WrEPEAS , the City of Ken-_ Comprehensive Plan contains Coals and policies whim recommend protection of cualitV and Quantity cf grcund water used for pllblic water sul=14eS ; and WWEREL_S, revised Kent Zon_ng Code provisicrs for single family residential densities and development standards , consistent with the abcve coals and policies , have been prepared and reviewed, with p u'-z__c comments obtained at two ioublic hear inns Conducted by the Kent Planning C=mm_ssicn, and recommended for adoption by the Planning Commission and the City Council Planning Committee ; and iri=EREr_S , pursuant to RCW 3o . 70A. 120 , the Growth Management Act requires that jurisdic_icns -act development reaulaticns Which are Consistent W4 :h and ' =)lem=nt the Comprehensive Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY C=NI CIL OF THE. C==Y OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HERESY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS : SECT-TON I . Subsection (E) of Sec--ion 1-5 . 04 . 005 is hereby amended as follows : Sec . 15 . 04 . 005 . Agricultural district, A-1 . The state^ coal of t _e City is tc pre_erve prime agricultural land in the Green River Valley as a nonrenewable resource . The agriCult_re Zcne s:_all activeiv encourage the CCL1Cc='_-ration cL aCri:'llltllral use in areas W incomuatibilit'v With ur-an uS'�_s will- be minimal to aid in the imclem=!'.:=...t.i0_". cf—figs: coal� . Fl:rt_`!cr, such classification cf -crime agr4C'ultura1 land thus re-ocr iz=s and encourages farming activity as a viable sector of the local economy. A. Pri ci_a7iy Ce=4 tted USeZ. Principally Per fitted uses are as TcllcwS : 1 . Agricultural uses , including any customary agricultural building or structure , such as planting, cultivation and harvesting of crops , animal husbandry, nurseries and Greenhouses and other acricultural occupations . 2 . one (1) single-family dwelling per lot . 3 . Group homes class I-A. B . Special permit uses. The fcllcwing- uses are permitted provided that they conform to the development standards listed in section 1 . 08 . 020 : 1 . Churches . 2 . Nursery schools and day care centers . C. �ccesslry uses. Permitted accessory uses are as follows : 1 . Guest cottaces not rented or otherwise conducted as a business . 2 . Accommodations for farm operators and employees , but not acccmmodatiens for transient labor. 3 . Roadside stands not exceeding four hundred (400) square feet in floor area, and not over twenty (20) lineal fee cn any side, primarily for the sale cf agricultural products on the prem_ses . 4 . Customary incidental home occllLaticns slll:ject to the provisions of section 15 . 08 . 040 . 5 . Other accessory uses and buildings c'lstomarlly aDDllrze-ant to a perm.i tte: use 6 . For permitted uses , hazardous substance_ land uses , including er_site_ hazardous waste treatment cr stcrage -facilities , which are not subject to cleanup permit reauirements of cnaoter 11 . 02 and Co not accumulate more th=- twenty thousand (20 , 000 ) pounds of hazardous substances or wastes or any combinaticn thereof at any one ( 1) time on the 81te, subject to the prcvis-ores of section 15 . 08 . 050 , except cf=site hazardous waste treatment or storage facilities , which are not permitted in this district . D . Ccndit_onal uses. Conditicnal uses are as follcwS : 1 . General conditional Lases as liszed in sec.:-on 15 . 08 . 030 . 2 . For permitted uses , accessory hazardous substance land uses which are not subject to cleanup permit reauirements of chapter 11 . 02 and which accumL'la_e more than twenty thousand (20 , 000) po>>ncs of hazardous substances or wastes or any combination thereof at anv one (7 time on the site, subjeC= to the prC'T1S_C_^.S of secticr 15 . 08 . 050 , except cffsite hazardous waste treatment or scoraLe facilities , which area not permitted in this district . a E . Develooment standards. 1 . Minimum lot. Minimum lot area is one thirtv four thousand seven hundred sauare feet (34 , 700) SECTION 2. Subsection (E) (2 ) of Section 15 . 04 . 005 is hereby amended as follows : 2 . Minim= lot widtiz. Minimum lot width is e ciXtV (60) fact a . To determine mir_lmum lot width for irregular lots , a circle of aoplicable diameter (the minimum lot width cermitted) shall be scaled within tY,e nronosed boundaries of the lot , nrovig-ed that an access easement to another JC7 is not lncludec Within the circle . 3 . Maximumm site covert Maximum site coverage Jls_.. thirty (3 0) percent . SECTION 3 . Subsection (=) (4) of Section 15 . 04 005 is hereby amended as follows : 4 . Minimum yard re-Lirements . a . Front yard. Minimum front yard is twenty (20) feet . (1) Porcnes and private shared courtvard features may be built_ within the fror__ building set back line . 5 b . Side yard. Minimum side yard is fifteen ( 15) feet . c . Rear yard. Minimum rear yard is twenty (20) feet . d. Side yard or flunking street or corner lot. Minimum side yard on the flanking street of a corner l:;t is twenty (20 ) feet . 5 . He2QiIt lin, ? t3t2Cr. T:__ heir'--_ llmi to ici? is two and one-half, (2 1/2) stories , not exceeding thirty-five (35) feet . The height lim- a-_ cns shall nC'_ Gpnly to har-_s G-_Q silos provided that they are not leca_ed Within fifty (50) fee_ of any 1c- line . 6 . P_dditicnal stancares . a . Structures for feeding, housing and care of animals , except hcus=_hold p e- s , mil be set back fi__y ( 50 ) feet from any property line b . See cha_te_ 15 . 03 , p=rta_nin_ to general and suzciementary p'_cvisions, for requirements concerning accessory buildings and additional sl..GndGrds . C . The following uses are prohibited : (1) The removal of topsoil for any purpose . 6 (2 ) Grade and fill operations , provided that limited grade and fill may be anorov_d as needed to construct buildings or structures as outlined in subsections 15 . O4 . 005 A. , B . , C . and D. (3 ) A11 subsurface activities , including excavation for underground utilities , pipelines or other underground installations , that cause permanent d'_SruDtlon of the surface of the land. Temporarily disrupted soil surfaces Shall be restored in a manner coP_S157-e—= with agricultural uses . (4) Dump in-- or storage of nonagricultural solid or liauid waste, or cf trash, rubbish or noxious material- (s) Activities that violate sound agr i cu l t u r a l soil and water COP_ScrvatiCn management praCtlCeS . SECTION 4_ Subsection (E) of Section 15 . 04 . 005 is hereby amended by adding a new subsecticn (7) as follows : 7 . 1waximum impervious surface cQyer.=C?. Maximum imperious surface coverage is a0o o- the total parcel area . a . Except for lots used for agricul`ur-1 Dractices , the maxim-Lim imcervlous surface area allowed shall be ten thousand ( 10 000 ) c-,..ua r feet when the los is Greater than one _e f___ acre SECTION S. Subsection of Section 15 . 04 . 005 is hereby amended by adding a new subsection (8 ) as follows : s . ZeYO lot line a71j C1L'=t? i a. Minimilm lot width . building setbacks a minimum lot Si z= reaualtions may be modified consistent with p~ovisicn_s for zero lot line and clusterina hcusino d=velccment . F. Signs. Ti_e Sion regulations of chapter 15 . 06 shall apply. G. rThe offs ree parki-a requirements cf chapter 15 . 05 shall apply. SECTION 6. Subsection (n) cf Section 15 . 04 . 010 is hereby amended as follows : Sec . 15 . 04 . 010 . Residential agricultural district, RA. The city has , t!_rcugh its F� and N? zones , the key to aSSuring efficient and atl-ractive arowth . It is essential that the city avoid excessive zon_inQ far in advance of demand. R=zonj nC o= RA ani MA iands to more 1 nt=nSlve L'Se shall be predicate upon t:-e dccume-t:lion_ of the need fcr additional residential , commercial industrial land in the city. . This documentation shall consist cf a fiscal impact a—lysls shcwi_r_C thar the other lands alr=ady zoned and accessible to murici:al Services arL- not sufficient or cultable to accommodate demand for = e ipropcsed uses and that the market demand fcr the proposed development is 8 sufficient to generate the revenues necessary to provide municipal services , including but not limited to police, fire, streets , water, drainage and sewer, required by the project . A. Principally permitted uses. Principally permitted uses are as follows : 1 . Agricultural uses, including any customary agricultural building or structure, such as planting, cultivation and harvesting of crops, animal husbandry, nurseries and greenhouses and other agricultural occuzations . 2 . One (1) single-family dwelling per lot . 3 . Group homes class I-A. B . Special permit uses. The following uses are permitted provided that t:'.ey conform to the develcz ent standards listed in section 15 . 08 . C20 : 1 . Churches . 2 . Nursery schools and day care centers . C. AccessCrV uses. Permitted accessory uses are as follows : 1 . Guest cottages not rented or otherwise conducted as a business . 9 2 . Fccommodaticns for farm oueratcrs and employees , but not accommoCct'_.^..ns for transient labor . 3 . RcadSide stand not exce-Q1_ four hundred (400) Square feet in floor area, and not over twenty (2C ) lineal feet on any side, Primarily for the sale of acricultural products crown on the premises . 4 . Customary incidental home cccup�ations subject to the provisions cf section 15 . 03 . 040 . 5 . Other aocesScry L;ses and build_res CldSZCm.=rely =cDllrze':=_^_- tO a per-mitted user e{CeLt for o_^_S17: _ h=zargcus w=Ste treatment and storm= facilitiez , which are nct tierm_tted in re-side-t_=_ zone_ . D . Ccr_dit'�nal L'SeS . CC:,Q1t1C`_=l uses are as follows : cener=l condition=l uses a_ lis_ed in section 15 . C8 . 030 . � . Devel-=7=nt standards . 1 . Minimum lot. Mi nimu,--i act =re= is n; r v four thcusar_d Sev=_n hundY=^ r34 . 700) square fee` SECTION 7. Subsection (7-) (2) of Section 15 . 04 . 010 is hereby ammended as follows : 2 . Min_=mum lot wic :_. Minimu-m lot width is G 10 a . To determine .minimum lot width for lrreaular lots . a circle of aDDlicable diameter Ithe minimum lot width nermitted) shall be scaled within the rroresed bcundaries of the lot , rrovided that an access easement to another lot is not included within the circle . 3 . Maximum site coverage. Maximum site coverage is thirty (30) percent . SECTION 8. Subsection (3) (4 ) of Section 15 . 04 . 010 is hereby amended as follows : a . Minimum yard requ;raMents. a . Front yard. M�n_mum front yard is twenty (20) feet_ . (1) . Porches and rrivate and s ared courtvard fe cures may be built wit_nin tare front buildina setback line . b . Side yard. Minimum side yard is fifteen (15) feet . C . Rear yard. Minimum rear yard is twenty (20) feet . d. Side yard en fla:-_kina street of corner lot. Minimum side yard on the flanking street of a corner lot 1s twenty (20) feet . 11 5 . -..'_ighL limitation . The height limitation is two and ore-half (2 1/2) stories , not exceeding thirty-five (85 ) feet . 6 . Additional standards. a . Structures for feeding, housing and care of animals, except household pets , shall be set back fifty (50 ) feet from an-; property line . b . See chapter 15 . 08 , pertaining to general and supplementary provisions , for requirements concerning accessory buildings and additional standarfs . SECTION 9. Subsection (.E) of Section •15 . 0,1 . 010 is hereby amended by adding a new subsection (7) as follows : 7 . MaX17T[LZllt i oeryicu S"Ir'_ac= aXimi:-.n i mce'-"ylous surface ccyerace is 401 of the total parcel area . a . Excent for lots used for agricultural uractices , the maximum imoervious surface area allowed shall he t o n= thousand ( 10 . 000 ) square feet when the l o t is are est e r i nan one acre . SECTION 10 . Subsection (E) of Section 15 . 04 . 010 is hereby amended by adding a new subsection_ (8 ) as follows : 8 _ Ze-3 10t line a:-2d C1 :S7QQn . Minimum lot wic-h , building setbacks , and minimum lot size r=_cualtions may be 7ncdified ccnsister= 12 with crovisions for zero lot line and clustering housing de7,elogme^.t . F . Sign-s . The sign regulmtions CL cHacter 15 . 05 Si=�11 apply. G. Offstreet parking. The cffstreet parking requirements of chapt=_r 1 . 05 shall apply. E. Development plan revi=W. 7evelopment plan review is required when the property to be developed is classified as view proper--y. SECTION 11 . Subsection (=_) of Section 15 . 04 . 020 is hereby amended as follows : Sec. 15 . 04 . 020 . Single-family residential districts . It is the purpose of the single-family residential districts to stabilize and preCerve low density, cin--Ie- family residential neighborhoods . -_ is further the purpose to provide a rar_ce of minimum lot s_zes in order to promote ty Of re�lCcntial dlversity _and recoanlze a varie environments . P_. Districts established by 'ot ar The following single-family residential districts are established: 1 . R1-20 : c_ tho _ n_ \2 y= is _ � � Sixteen thousand (15 . 0001 are feet minimum lot area . 13 5 .- F�icht limitation . The height limitation is two and one-half (2 1/2 ) stories , not exceeding thirty- five (35 ) feet . 6 . Additional standards . a . Structures for feeding, housing and care of animals, except household nets , shall be set back fifty (50 ) feet from a- property line . b . S e chapter 15 . 08 , pertaining to general and suppleme--nary, crovis_ons, for reauirements concerning accessory buildinas and additional standar== . SECTION 9. Subsection (--- ) of Section -15 . 04 . 010 is hereby amended by adding a new subsection (7) as follows : 7 . C--veraCe. Max-mum imeeryioL's surface coverage is 401 of the total carcel area a . EXcect for lots used for agricultural tract=Ces . the maximum lmcervlcus sL'rface area a -w=d shall be ten thousand (10 , 000 ) square feet when th= l o t is are:t e r L nGn one acre . SECTION 10- Subsection (E) of Section 15 . 04 . 010 is hereby amended by adding a new _ibsectior_ (8) as follcWs : 8 . ZerJ IOt line and CI St= 'nC. M_njmum 1Gt WiCZh . bu_1d_na and minimum 1ct s1Ze may c ! he .<<gdj fj---ed c�-- en-- n - e--- 12 2 . R1-12 : N__ r i -,a . �v six hundred (9 , 600 ) scuare feet minimum lot area . 3 . F_1- 9 . 6 . - - Seventy six hundred (7 , 600 ) scuare fee_ minimum lot area . 4 . R1-7 . 2 : Fifty seven huncrea ( 5 , 7JO ) sQuare feet minimum lot are= . Four thousand- (4 , 000) scruare feet minimum lot area . Zoni-n-a area . M'_nimum zcn=ng area f_-r the R1- . 0 district is fi_ een tousa_.d scuare Lett ( . ) IOC ) C. 11 X=:gat._-:] zOr-L a Greer . Ma:{-mum zoni-'c area fc'r t=:= R1-I . 0 d_strict is e_c gi acres . D . Fr_rc__a?ly perm-ttec use_ . Frincizally perm_tted uses are as f u l l ow s 1 . Cne (1) si rcl e-i: i._1V dWc_11nQ per ict . 2 . Crop and tree farm.i Tl : . 3 . Grcun homes class I-A. F . CC;eC=a7 De=it uses. ine =cllc—' = uses are perm_ ted prcvided they ccnfcrm to the deveic .me_nr: standards listed in se^_ i= 1I . 0 . 020 : 1 . C:-urches . 2 . Nursery schools and day care centers . F. Accessory uses. Permitted accessory uses are as follows : 1 . Accessory uses and buildings customarily appurtenant to a permitted use, such as garages, carports and minor structures for storage of personal property. 2 . Rooming and boarding of not more than three (3 ) persons . 3 . Customary incidental home occupations subject to the provisions of section 15 . 08 . O40 . G. Conditional uses. Conditional uses are as Follows : General conditional uses as listed in section 15 . 08 . 030 . SECTION 12. Subsection (_? cf Section 15 . 04 . 020 is hereby amended as follows : H. Development standards . 1 . Minimum lot. Minimum lot area is as follows : a . R1-20 : _ __tl —. _ca_i 0 Sixteen thousand (16 , 000) square feet . b . R1-12 : _ . el -?-e'-ss--- NL nets six hundred (9 . 600) sauare feet . 15 c . R1-9 . 6 : _.-_e t` _ca nd c_:. Seventy six hundred (7 , 600 ) square feet . d . R1-7 . 2 : Fifty seven hundred ( 5 , 700 ) square feet . e . R1-5 . 0 : _ _ . ___ _oa___ ;5 , 0 Four thousand (4 , 000) square feet . SECTION 13 . Subsection O (2 ) of Section 15 . 04 . 020 is hereby amended as fclicws : 2 . n?7=imu-7l lot W=Gytn. lot width is as follows : a . R1-20 : 5- _--___ Fifty ( 50 ) feet . b . R1-12 : Fifty ( 50) feet . C . R1-9 . 6 : :--- F' - v (50) feet . d. R1-7 . 2 : =__1_ Fif v (50 ) feet . e . R1-5 . 0 : _ _-_1 Forty (40) feet . f . To determine mi-•imum lot width for irregular lots . a circle of applicable diameter (the rinim= lct width permitted) shall be scaled within the rroposed bcundaries of the lot , --ovided that an access -=se-7e7:c to another lot is not included wi~`_in the circ7 = 16 SECTION 14 . Subsection O (3 ) of Section 15 . O4 . 020 is hereby amended as follows : 3 . Maximum site coverages. Maximum site coverage is as follows : a . R1-20 : Thirty (30) percent . b . R1-12 : T`___t! (_ Fcrty five (45) Dercent . C . R1-9 . 6 : T ir- Forty five (45) -1 percent . d. R1-7 . 2 : _- -; ''J -ty (50) percent . e . R1-5 . 0 : Fi ftv five (55) Percent . SECTION 15. Subsectior: (-) (a) cf Section 15 . O4 . 020 if here✓y amended as _oll_a : 4 . Minimu -m yard t5. a . Front yard. M, --mum front yard , s != ten (1 0) 1 At least 20 linear feet of drivewav shall be Drovided between anv aaraae , carport or other Drimary Darkina ar-a -_d t`�_'� street DroDerty 1?ne with the exception of an alley DroDerty line . 17 2 PcrCl-Gc an,] --rlyate and sham_^. ceurtvard f =tur=_= may be buil_ within t- front building setback line . 3 ProzDcsed front vares less than twenty feet in deoth are subject to accroval the P1anr.ing D-,actor , base c_n ,=view and recGmmendaticn -From the P ,' l ; Wcr"'CS CDal r-� = eve tc the existing and tune traff_c vclumes and right-cf-wav as scecif i ed i n L'— City cf K=fit C^^..,Dr=•^=r ci v= T'r:T1CDL`Yt=- lnP Plan and C� Iv C Kc_^,t CcnS7-"'1Ct1Cn ard. MJ -n- mum side yard is five (5) fee= - c . Rear yar-j. y1 r_i-um rear yard 4 s e -- (3) fe t . d. side yard cn ilsn ing street of c=e-- _o-, . M1n_mum Sara On the flanki,- Street OL a CC'_".c'_' lot 1s fifteen (15 ! 5 . .eight limitaticn. 1--eight limitaticns are as fc1lows : a . R -20 : Iwo and One-half (2 1/2 ) nct exceed_=.c t _irty- five 13 b . R1-12 : Two and one-half (2 1/2 ) stories , not exceeding tirty-five (35 ) feet . C . R1-9 . 6 : Two and one-half (2 1/2 ) stories , not exceeding thirty-five (35) feet . d. R1-7 . 2 : Two and one-half (2 1/2) stories , not exceeding thirty-five (35) feet . e . R1-5 . 0 : Two and one-half (2 1/2) stories, not exceeding thirty (30) feet . 6 . Interior yards. T_ntericr yards shall not be computed as part of ne site coverage . 7 . Additional standards . See chapter 15 . 08 , Pertaining to general and supplementary provisions, for recuirements concerning accessory buildings and additional standards ; provided that solar access setback recuirements of sections 15 . 08 . 230 through 15 . 08 . 234 shall not apply to the R1-5 . 0 zone . SECTION 16. Subsection (=) of Section 15 . O4 . 020 is hereby amended by adding a new s'_-''secticn (8) as follows : S . h_raximum impervious surface coverage. Maximum imrervious sdr=ace coverages are as follows : a . R1-20 • Fcrzv (-'_0 ) percent - b . R1-12 : Fif v ( 50 ) percent . 1g c . R1-9 . 5 ; Sixty ( 50 ) percent . d . 1-11-7 . 2 : Seve- v (70) Dercent . e . R1-5 . 0 ; Seven`v five (75) percent . f Except for lots used for acr_cultural Dra=ices . t_^_e maXlmllm i mcery 1ous surface arc- Gl7owea ='all he ten thousand (10 . 000 ) scuar� f^eet . SECTION I7-. -ubsection O of Secticn 15 . 04 . 020 is hereby amended by adding a new subsection (9) as follows : a Zero lot line and - mi a 1c7 Width, and mi _TUm lot size reeaualticns may e modi_i='1 ccns=Sent With Drotiiciprc =Cz- zee ) 1pt !in- and clusterinc hcus d=7,7=_7 merit . I . S_cns . The sign roc luf_o_s cf chapter 15 . 06 shall apply. J. OLLS=.=et pa2`JL1':g. The _Str__.. parking recrulations of chapte- __ _ 05 shall apply. K. Development pla- review. _evelopment plan review is recuired when the property to be developed is classified as tiie`.A7 DrcDer-v. SECTION 13. Subsection cf section 15 . 04 . 030 is hereby amended as follows : Sec . 15 . 04 . 030 . Duplex multifamily residential district , h'2- D _ 20 It is the purpose of the MR-D district to provide for a limited increase in population density and allow for a greater variety of housing types by allowing duplex dwelling units . A. Principally permitted uses . Principally permitted uses are as follows : 1 . One (1) single-family dwelling per lot . 2 . One (1) duplex per lot . 3 . GrouD homes class I-A and I-B . q . Crop and tree farming . CDecial pe=it uses. The following uses are permitted provided that they conform to the develoument standards listed in section 15 . 08 . 020 : 1 . Churches . 2 . Nurseery schools and day care centers . C . Accessory uses. Permitter accessory uses are as follows : 1 . Accessory uses and buildings customarily aDTJurte^cant to a permitted use, such as carag s , carports and minor structures for storage of personal property. 2 . Roominc and bca_dine cf not mere than three (3 ) persons . 3 . Customary incidental home_ occupations subject to the provisions of section 15 . 08 . 0=0 . D . Cond2tlonai lases. CCriC_t'onal uses are as follows : 1 . General condltlenal uses listed in section is . 08 . 030 . 2 . Group homes class = -C, II-A, II-S and II-C . Development standards . 1 . '_^1mllL7 lot. Min1Tium lot area 1s as follows : a . Single-fa7.-1y dw_11; r_cs : y..- - " - -`' seven -- �.... ------- -- � - - - h-,•--,dre - - - . 700 ) szuar_ L= b . Duplex (twc-family dwe'_linc unit ) : Eight thousand five hundred (8 , 500) feet . SECTION 19_ Subsecticn (n) (2) of Section 15 . 04 . 030 is her_hy amended as follows : 2 . M-inirn m lot wid�= Minimum lct width is as follows : G Single-family dwelling : -n- i Fifty ( 50) feet . 1 To d_ter.��-ne mit_imum lot width irre ular 1^ s , a circle of avo-_cable ` _me-er (the minimum 10-. w-dth c e vm; tredl shall be scaled within the proposer,', boundaries of the lot , provided that an access easement to another lot is not included within the circle . b . Duplex: Eighty (80) feet . SECTION 20. Subsection (E) (3 ) of Section 15 . O4 . 030 is hereby amended as follows : 3 . M_aximum site coverage. Maximum site coverace is as follows : a . Single-family d=.vellina : --___- -1 Fiftv (50) percent . b . Duplex : Forty (SO) percent . SECTION 21 . Subsection (E) (S) (a) of Section 15 . O4 . 030 is hereby amended as follows : 4 . Minimum yard rea-a i remen is. a . Front yard. Minimum front yard is ten ( 10) feet . At least 20 feet of driveway shall be r-rcvided between anv aaraae . carport or other Drlmary parklna area and the street pro erty line with the except-or_ of an allev property l i-le 23 2 . Porches and Drivate and seared courtvard features may be built within the front building se--back lire . 3 . Proncsed front vards less than twentv feet in decth are subject to acDroval by the Planning Directc~ . based on review and recommendation from the Public Wcrks Department relative to the existing and future traffic volumes and rlcnt-O--WaV r e'.7lllreme-,-� as S^„eci f i ad i n the City cf Kent Comcrehensive TranSpCr==::jc _ ?lan and Ci`y Of Ker-t Ccns7---lcz-4- —= St---lards . b . --de yard. Min-mum side yard is five ( ) feet . C . Rear yard. Min_mum rear yard is eight (8) feet . d. Side yard cn asking street of corner log. Minimum side yard cn the flankin:: street or a corn=- lot is fifteen (15 ) feet . 5 . Fze-aht liIDi =-atics. The height limitation is two and one-half (2 1/2 ) stories , not exceeding thirty-five (3 ) feet . 6 . Interior yards . Int=_r_er yards shall not be c Cmzuted as part c- t_ne S_t- ccverage . 7 ,, 7 . Additional stand=rds . See chapter 15 . 08 , pertaining to general and supplementary Drovisions, for requirements concerning accessory buildings and additional standards . SECTION 22. Subsection_ (E) of Section 15 . 04 . 030 is hereby amended by adding a new subsection (8 ) as follows : 8 . Maximum impervious surface. Maximum impervious surface '_s seventy (70) percent of. the total lot area . a . Except for lots used for agricultural practices , - - maximam impervious surface area alicwed shall be ten thousand (10 . 000 ) square fie* when the log is are=-_r - =n one acre . b . Porches and private and shared courtyard features may be L'1it within the frpn_ building setback SECTION 23 . Subsection (=) of Section 15 . 04 . 030 is hereby amended by adding a new subsection (9) as follows : 9 Zero lot line and clLaterinc. Minimum lot width, building setbacks and minimum lot size_ r=_aualtions may modified consistent with Drovisions for zero lot line and ciusterina housing deveicpment . F . Signs . The sign regulations of chapter 15 . Oo shall aDDly. G . OffStreet parking. The offstreet parking recuirements of chapter i . QS shall apply. H. Development plan review. Development plan review is required when the property to be developed is classified as view property. SECTION 24 . Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional oy a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or u constitutionality shall not affect the validity or cor_stit._ticnality of any other section, sentence, clause or phras= of this .Ordinance . SECTION 25. Effective Date . This ordinance shall take effect and be 1n force t^__r i, (30 ) days from and after its passage, Gpprcval and oupl_catL= as provided by law. J WHITE , MAYOR ATTEST . EREDIDA JACOBER, //CITY CLER{ 2 G APPROVED AS TO FORM : RG FER A. LL?OVICH, CITY ATT PNT PASSED / �l day of jGC�� _�� 1995 . APPROVED day of 1995 . PUBLISHED day of �J'�� 1995 . I herahy certify that this is a tr'.:e copy of Ordinance passed by the City Council of the City of Kent , Washington, and approved by the Mavcr of the City of Kent as hereon indicated. 2-�' , 4 E R E N D l�AC"BER, CITY CLERK 27 �J ORDINANCE NO. s G41, D c� 38 c AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the k g City of Kent , Washington, m-G in ce_ t r`--a-"__' amendments to Chapter 15 . 04 of the Zoning i 5 y *� . C.v COce, as recently GlllenQe�.. by Ordinance No . and making own=r amendments to the Zoning Code to clarify previously established aensi tV standards ZK?aS, The City of Kent Com_rehensive Plan conta_ns acals and DOlicieS which s,.DOrt a variety of housing tvDeS and �j enSiL15S -n_-Ughout the City, --iclu ng mo__ ngl = GT__y than / multi fami_J nt aeve-ODmen7S , more lcK_.^,i1.i-i� and =1 I renovation in terms of building and sit des_,,n and resident_Gl o• the City of Kenn Com:rehenSitie Plan COnt:ins C--GIS and nclicies Which recommend exransicn o- home OW'icrS"iD ~ C=Dortunities for all income groups ; and IL DL „�Lj W-r,7-. as tn- City of Kent ComDrene-live Plan contains �(J c =i s and DOlicie-s which recommend a revised calculation s,✓ste determining maximum allowahle s_-a—e family density; and J con ADD ' ,5 C 4vr_ RErS, The City Council , On December 19 , 1995 , adopted Ordinance NO . 3268 revising Kent zoning Code proviSil-ns for single family residential develooment Standards, COPS-Stcllt with the above coals and policies ; and I W::EREAS, following adoption of ordinance No . 3268 the Council has determined that corrective, non-substantive amendments should be made to the zon-nc Code to clarify the revisions made to the code pursuant to said Ordinance ; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF T"r_.? CITY OF =ENT, WAS INGTON, DOES HERESY ORDAIN AS FO%LOWS : SECTION I . There is he- -y added to Chapter 15 . 02 of the Kent City Code, entitled "Def n;=ior_s , " a new section, Section 15 . 02 . 096 , to read as follows : Sec . 15 . 02 . 096 . Density, maximILM pe=itted. r Maximum permitted density referS to the maximum number Ot single family dwelling units permitted per acre . For fractions of an acre, a maximum permitted density shall be Droocrticnal to the size of the lot . For example, w:__'-'-- the maximum Permitt=`d density is six (6) single family dwelling units per acre, the maximum permitted density on one half (1/2) acre is three (3) single family dwelling units, s--bject to lot size and other development star_aaras of Chapter 15 . C_ . 2 SECTION 2. Chatter 15 . C2 cf the Kent City Cod =ntztled "Definitions " is amerlded b,✓ amending Section 15 . 02 . 487 to read as follows : Sec . 15 . 02 .467 . Single-family district. =_ single-family zoninc district is a zc-.inc district w_=z any of the followinc designations : - _ SR-2 , ___ =2SR-3 , �CRd �j , residential , residential acricultural =rd P_-1 . acrid„Mural district . SECTION 3 . There is here'--v added to Chapter 15 . 02 cf the Kant City Code, entitled "Defin-__OP-S , ° a new section, Section 15 . 02 . 528 , - read as follows : Sec . 15 . 02 . 588 . Zoning districts-redefined. Pay references in the Kent City Code to the former zoni-.g districts R1-5 . 0 , R1-7 . 2 , R1-9 . R--12 . 0 , R1-20 . 0 and RA shall mean the zoning districts d Sic=at=c a_ follows : 0 -me - Zone C,,r,--ent Zone R1-5 . 0 c=-8 R1-7 . 2 =-6 R1-9 . 6 SR-4 . 5 R1-12 . 0 `R-3 R1-20 .-0 S=-2 RA SR-1 SECTION 4 . Section 15 . 04 . 005 of the Kent City Code is hereby amended to read as fellows : Sec. 15 . 04 . 005 . Agricultural district, A-1 . The stated coal of the city is tc pr_serJe z=. me a Qr?cultural !and in the Green R=Ver 'valley as a nonrenewable resource . The aCricultL're zore S:iall apt=J-Iy enccuraQe the concentration of agric`.1lz ral uses i- areas where inccmcati.:_11ty with urban uses will be minimal tO a 4 d in the imclementation of 3 I i' those classificationoals . Further, such classification cf prime agricul�urGl land thus recognizes and encourages farming activity as a viable isector of the local economy. A. Principally permitted uses. Principally permitted uses are as follows : 1 . Agricultural uses, including any customary agricultural buildinC or structure, such as planting, cultivation and harvesting of crops , animal husbandry, nurseries and greenhouses and other agricultural occupations . 2 . one (1) single-family dwelling per lot . 3 . Croup homes class I-A. B . Srecial p==it uses. The following uses are permitted provided thatthey Conform zo the development sta_aares listed in section 15 . 08 . 020 : 1 . Churches . 2 . Nursery schools and day care centers . C. ?accessory uses. Permitted cccesscry uses are as follows : 1 . Guest cottages not rented or otherwise conducted as a business . - 2 . Accommodations for farm opceraters and employees, but not accommodations for transient labor. 3 . Roadside stands not exceeding four hundred (400) sauare feet in floor area, and not over twenty (20) lineal feet on any side, primarily for the sale of agricultural products on the premises . 4 . Customary incidental-home occupations subject to the provisions of sec icn 15 . 08 . 040 . Other accessory uses and nuildinas customarily an'J rtenant to a permitted use . G . For permitted uses, hazardous substance land uses , including onsite hazardous waste treatment or storage facilities, which are not subject to cleallL'D permit real:lrem.ents of chapter 11 . 02 and do not accumulate more than twenty thousand (20 , 000 ) pounds of hazardous substances or wastes or any combination thereof at any one (1) time on the site , subjecz to the provisions of section 4 ;i 1 . C8 . 050 , except of_site hazardous waste 4 . treatment or stora'-e -ac_11ties , wnIcll are i� permitted in this dlstr'_cz . 7 . Accessory dwelllnc units . For nu=Oses Of ':ris ;i cnctloII Sector 15 . 04 . 00= . acceS=Ory Qwel _n g units shall not be ,ncluaed in talc„lar ; nc -ham maximum density. D . conditional uses. Conditional uses are as follows : 1 . General conditional L's— as listed 1n s=-zlcn 15. . 08 . 030 . 2 . For permitted uses, accessory hazardous suzszance lard uses which are not subject to cleanup permit reOL'lrementS OS CY'.a:.ter =1 . 02 and which aCCi:T:�lat_ more than twenty thousand (20 , 000) pounds hazardous Substances or wastes Or a^.V cOmL__.a�.i tnereof at any cne ( time On t:^_-- Site, s--'-JjcCt to the prov-isions of section _5 . 08 . 050 , exc_pt O.F-i-e hazardou's waste t--men:: Or stcraa= facilities , whlcn are nc:: permitted in this - - C1St- L . F . DEV,=?ODII]Ent stanCards. T'r =- for the a-I zOP_ina di str_- - is C'--e SJ-ale =ami l l- dwelli7a unit rer acre . 1 n,r_i^imum lot. M-ni mug.. lot are= is th=rty--our thcusand seventy hunc—' (3= , 700) s_uare 2 . Nrin=mum _lot wzdtT:. M-n mum lct width is S'Xty (00) a . To determine lot wilt ! for irregular lots , a circle Of applicable c-ameter (the minimum lot _ W'1c=R perm,-tte�) s-,a_1 b: SCalcQ W1t:71?1 the proposed boundaries of tr_e lot , provided that an access easeme-t to anct_-_er lot is not includ_d within the circle . 3 . N?Y1ry77 site ccv are . Maximum s-t_ COveraCe _ thirty (30) percent 4 . M_inirn�m ya-d r_�sirEm=nts . a . FZ'Ont 'v"ard. M1:' T.um front yard is twenty (20 ) deer . 5 I i (1) Porches and private shared courtyard features may be built within the front building set back line . b . Side yard. Minimum side yard is fifteen (15) feet . C . Re_r yard. Minimum rear yard is twenty (20) i; feet . d. Bide yard Cn rIar�aln4 stre=t of co=er _Ot. Minimum side yard on the flanking street c_ a corner lot is twenty (20 ) feet . 5 . H�i�nt (imitation. The height limitation is two and one-half (2 1/2) stories, not exceeding thirty-five (35) feet . The height limitations shall not apply to barns and silos provided that they are not located wit_^rn fifty (50) iee= o- any lot line . 6 . Additional standards. a. Structures for feeding, housing and care of animals , except household pets , shall be set back fifty (50) feet from any property like . b . See c-anter 15 . C3 , pertaining to general and supplementary CrO'vlslons , for re?il'_remen,-s concerr_irg accesScry buildings and additional standards . C . The following uses are prohihited: (1) The removal of topsoil for any purpose . (2) Grade and fill operations, provided t_.at limited grade and fill may be approved as needed---to construct buildings or structures as Outlined in subsections 15 . 04 . 005 F. , E . , C . and D . (3 ) All subsurface activities , including excavation for underground utilities , pipelines cr other underground installations , that cause permanent disruption of the Surface of the land. Temperarlly disrupted soil surfaces s'nall be restored in a manner consistent with acr'_cL:_tu'ral uses . 6 i (S) Dumping or sZoraae o: nonaur_cult'..:-G1 solid or 1_4 =id waste , or of trash , rubbish cr noxious materials . (5) Activities that violate_ sound aaric-aitu'ral soil and water conse'_"-Jaticn management practices . 7 . Maximum impervious surface coverage. Maximum 1m_pervlcus surface coverage is forty (a0) T-erCe:" of the total parcel are . a. Except for lots used =or agriCu'ltu'ral practices, the maximum imipervious surface area allowed shall be tin thousand (10 , 000) square fe _ when t__'a lot is greater t=an °=:_ (1) acre . 8 . 2=r0 ?C t 2_ne aZlQ Mi r i mL'm lot WiCt--., building setbacks , a_-c m_n_m:sm lot size regulations may _e modified consistent Witn provisi cns for zero lot 1___ ar_d clustering housing development . The sign _e i__.._C'r.-- °_ Cn Gpl_eY � � 0'J shall apply. C . Oristreet parking. ln= Cffs�re=_ par:til_T?c re�t11'_"e:ile.�!t= of Chapter 15 . 05 small app_y. SECT:O?V 5. Section 15 . 0S . 010 of the Kent City Code is hereby amended to read as follows : Sec . 15 . 04 . 010 . Residential agricultural district, :_�-SR-1 . The City has, through its _ _SK-1 a-_a MA zones , the key to aSSL'r=_g efficient and attractive crowtn_. It is essential that I the city avoid exCessive zoning far in aC_vance of demand. j Y-zoning of and M_? lands to mcre is-=e Sive use shall be _Ledicated upon the dccume`ita=-cn of t_-e _seed for additio7al -eside`atial , commercial or industrial _.=n: i: the city. -15 I Cocumentaticn s_-_all CcnC_i CZ o_ a fiscal imzaC Gnalvsis sncwW g_ that the other 1a-_u5 all-G^-v zonea and accesslhle to mu'n_icipal I - services are not sur'1cie_nt or suitable to acccmmeCate demand for the proposed uses and that the mar}-._7: demand for the propcsed 7 i i I development 1S SllLLicient to generat t necessarye he revenues necessary to provide municipal services, including but not limited to pclice , fire, streets , water, drainage and sewer, required by the : project . A. principally permitted uses. Principally permitted uses are as follows : j 1 . Agricultural Uses , includlnc any customary agricultural building or structure, such as planting, cultivation and harvesting of crops , animal husbandry, nurseries and greenhouses and other acricultural occupations . 2 . One (1) single-family dwe llina per lot . 3 . Group homes class I-A. a . Spec_a1 permit uses. The =cllowing uses are permitted provided that they conform to the development standards listed in section 15 . 08 . 020 : 1 . Churches . 2 . Nursery schools and day care centers . C. Accessory uses. Permitted accessory uses are as follows : 1 . Guest cottages P_ct re'.teq or otherwise Conducted as a business . 2 . Accommodations for _a-m cperatorS and employees , but not accommodations for transient labor. 3 . Roadside stand not exceeding four hundred (400) - square feet in floor area, and not over twenty (20) lineal feet on a--., side, primarily for the Sale of agricultural _ -cducts grown on the premises . 4 . Customary incidental ^iome occupations subject tc the provisions of section 15 . 08 . 040 . 5 . Other accessory uses and buildings customarily appurtenant to a permitted use, except for ers_te hazardous waste treatment and storage facilities , which are not permitted in residential zones . G . Accessory dwelling units . For purposes of this sec ion . Section accessory dwellfr_a Units shall P_ct be Included in Calculating the maximum Der-nittea d- nsity. D . COPlditiOnal uses. CO_^_d-ticnal uses are as follows : general conditional uses as listed in section 15 . 08 . 030 . E . DeveloDmEnt standards. The maximum nerm=tted d-nsit-y for the SR-1 zoning district is one single family dw-Il t nu unit aer a.c.r.e . 1 inimum lot. Minimum Ict area is thirty-four thousand seven hundred (35 , 700) square feet . 2 . MiP_iMUM lot width. Mi-_imum lcL width is sixty (60) f==t- . a . To determine min-mum lot width for irregular lots, a circle of applicable diameter (7-_2e minimum lot wide:~ aermitZed) shall be scaled within t-he propcsed boundaries cf t:-:e lot , . provided that an acce-SS casement tO �,-OLner lot is not included within the circle . 3 . N'aximum site cover, C=. Mcx'_mi;m site cO"v2rage -s thirty (30) percent . a _ rvr;nimum yard requ'r a. Front 'yard. M_-i m,um front yard is twenty (2 ) feet d (1) Porches and private and sh__ed courtyar - f __- eatures may be built Wit71 h _-ORt b u i I d i ng se�bark li L1e . b . Side yard. m_jr_i m ide vard is fifte=_'_ (15) feet . C . Pear yard. Minir._i rear yard is twe_,ty (20 ) feet . d. Side yard en dancing street Of corner lot. Minimum side vard on the flanking street cL L corner lot is twenty (20) feet . 5 , Fsight limitation. TPe heiCht 11mit_t 1s tWO and one-half (2 1/2) stories , not excee�--?g thirty-five (3E) 6 . Additional standards . a . Structures for fee-ding, housing_ and care of animals , except household pets , s:.all be set back fifty (50) feet frcm any property line . 0 'i b . see chapter 15 . Qa , pertaining to general and suoDlementary provisions, for requiremen_s concerning accessory buildings and additional standards . 7 . Maximum impervious su -Lace coverage. Maximum imnervicu's surface coverage is forty (40) percent j - of the total parcel area . a . Exceot for lots used for agricultural ii practices , the maximum impervious surface a red, allowed 5.-�_ _all be ten thousand (10 , 000) sc-aar? feet when the lot is greater t1nan one (1) acre . 8 . zero lot 71r_e and clu'sterinQ. N?iIjTnum lot Width, building setbacks , and minimum lot Size _eGulations may be modified corSiste-net WitP_ P-�- Yov15icns for zero 1Ct line and clustering housing development . F. Sites. Tine Sign regulations of chapter 15 . 05 s .a71 apply. G. 01 Y�=t The " - Y=et rking requirements ^ L_ _ pG_x___g. o__s_ pG_ o c:Gol er 1 . 05 s'nal_ at r-ly. F?. DeVeZODme_'!t plan review. Ee've_opment plan review is re''.uire- when the prCDerty tO be develCDed is claSsified as view property. SECTION 6. Section 15 . 04 . 020 of the Kent City Code is hereby amended to read as follows :— Sec . 15 . 04 . 020 . Single-family residential districts . It is the purpose of the single-family residential districts to stabilize and preserve low density, single-family residential neighborhoods . it is further the purpose to provide a ranee of minimum lot Sizes in order to promote diversity and recognize variety of residential environments . A - -- -Districts established by _' -- - ---maximum aermitt_ d,-nsi tV. The following si rgl e-Family residential districts are establishaei - 1� I! Two (2 ) single farm I dwe_1=ng units Der acres 2 . 3 ) s i ncle f=roily dwelling units Der acre . - - -- -- --•- -- ---`o,dr and coo ralT (4 . 5 ) si nale fa7.i lV dWell i ng 1=1tS Der aCre . 4 . dwelling units Der C-� uni is 'J`r acre . b . 1?S7: 1muIR ZO -n�7 ar= . M_n_T.'.:m ?lg arc SOI t-n= -- -=SR-� d Str1Ct is fifteen thousand (15 , 000) scr-d are feet (three (3 ) lots) . C. MaX1muI7 ZOT'P_a arc NiaXlii lm ZCP_'_nG are fcr the r_ district is elcrt ( ) - D . - -'nC=-ajjy uses are as ollOW= : 1 . One (_) s; ncle-family dwelling per lot . 2 . Croo and tree farm_n' . 3 . CrouD homes Class T-L . E . SZ)eCj a7 permit us—es. T?'_e f of low_ng uses are Deral=t t ed DrOV=ded they conform to t_`le develonme_^_t standards listed in section 15 . 08 . 020 : 1 . Churches . 2 . Nursery schools and day care centers . F . Accessory uses. Permitted accessory uses are as follows : 1 . Accessory uses and huild=ng_s customarily a-:Dune-. nt tO a DerL ._t—d use , such as Ca---es c=-,Dots and minor struCtlireS =--r storage c: Derscnal property . 2 . ROOm_n,g and he-=d-i= of not more than three (3 ) Dersoi-s . "I I 3 . Customary incidental home occupations subject to the provisions of section 15 . 08 . 040 . a- . Accessory dwelling units . Tor Durocse of this section Section 15 . 04 . 020 . accessory dwelli=,� j units shall not be included in calculating t'_e ii maximum Der-,Pitted density. G. Conditional llS2S. Conditional uses are as fO1lOWS '.General conditional uses as listed in section 15 . 08 . 030 . H. Development standards. 1 . Minimum lot. Minimum lot area is as follows : a. r_ 2 SR-2 : Sixteen thousand (16 , 000) scuare feet . Ninety-six hundred (9 , 600) square feet . C . _._ , . 'SR-4 . 5 : Seventy-six hundred (7, 600) square feet . d. ^_ , . 2SR-6 : Fifty-seven hundred (5 , 700) sauare feet . e . ^_ - . 0SR-8 : Four thousand (4 , 000) souare feet . 2 . Minimum Iot wid-,' . Mi^_imum lot width is as follows : a . 2== SR-2 : Fifty (50) =eet . b. _ _2aRR3 : Fifty (50) feet . C . R' 0 . 0SR-4 . 5 : Fifty (50) feet . d. RI 7 . ^SR-6 : Fifty (50) feet . e . � OSR-8 : Forty (40) feet . To determine minimum lot width for irregular lots , a circle cf applicable diameter ( the minimum lot width permitted) shall be scaled within the proposed boundaries of the lot , Drovided that an access easement to another lot is not included within the circle . 3 . Maximum site coverage. Maximum site coverage is as follows : a , r_ 20SR-2 : Thirty (30) percent . b. __SR-3 : Forty-five (45) percent . C . =_ _ . 'SR-4 Fcrty-five (45) percent . 12 d. .SR-5 : Fifty (50) percent . e . _ _ . "SR-8 : Fifzy-_-ive_ (55) percent . Yiniin= yard requirements. a. Front yard. Minimum front yard is ten (10) feet . (1) At least twenty (20) linear feet of driveway shall be provided between any garage, carmort or other primary narkina j area and the street property line with the exceDticn o- an alley DroDertV line . (2) Porches and private and seared courtyard features may be built within the front building_ setback line . (3 ) Proposed front yards less than twenty (20) feet in depth are sub� _ct to approval by the clannina director, baSed on review and _commendation from the Public wcri:S department relative to t_^_e existing and flture traffic volumes and riQ'r_t-Of-w=y -=dL'1 cc 1tS as specified in the cl-v comi-re_"le_r_slve tranSDort=ticn plan and city construction st=ndards . b . �?de yard. Minimum side yard is five (5) C . Pear yard. Mir__mum rear yard is eight (8 ) feet . d. Side yard on F?anking street c= corner lot. Minimum side yard on the flanking street cf corner lot is fifteen (15) feet . 5 . !'eiahL limitaticn . -eight limitations are aS follows : J a . r- --..,-.2 : Two and one-half (2 1/2) stories , not exceeding t'r_irty-five (35 ) feet . -SR-3 : Two and one-half (2 1/2) stories , not exceeding thirty-five (35) feet . C . -SR-? 5 • Two and one-half (2 1/2) stories, not exceeding thirty-five (35 ) feet . d. .._ . . SR-6 : Two and one-half (2 1/2) stories, not exceeding thirty-five (35 ) feet . 13 SR-a : Two and one-half (2 1/2 ) st �c i not exceeding thirty (30 ) fee_ . 6 . Interior yards. Interior yards shall not be computed as part of the _site coverace . 7 . Additional standards. See chapter 15 . 08 , pertaining to general and SllDDIeT.c''_t- provisions, for rec-air=_ments concerning accessory build-ings and addlt=Gnat Standards ; provided that solar access setback requirements of sections 15 . 08 . 230 through 15 . 08 . 234 shall not apply to the R1-5 . 0 zone. e . Maximum impervious 6Cr_=Ce COver ge. Maxlmilm impervious surface Gv;'_razes are as =0110WS : a. T=�OSR-2 : .orty (=0) percent . b. _3SR-3 Fifty ( ) percent . C . := SR-c Six__✓ (60) percent . d. T===SR-5 Sev=-- (70) percent . e . (75 ) - =rcent . Except for lots used for agricultural practices, the 7t_aX-mum impervious Sllr'aCe area allowed all pe ten thousand (10 , 000 ) srnuare feet . 9 . Zero IOt line 'and C-j7St=-'1n0. M1?" m�i= lot wid-.h, building Setbacks, and minimum lot size regulations may be mcd1--e<-'- cons i-ste"t Wit}'1 1provisions for zero lot 1i_ne and clustering housing development . I . Signs. The sign regul=tior_s of chapter 15 . 06 shall apply. J. Or"=street parking. The offstreet parking regulations of chapter 15 . 05 shall anpl-✓- K. Development plan review. Development plan review is reauired when the property be tG be developed is classified as vle`.J proper y. SECTION 7. Section 15 . 0= . 030 of the Kent City Code is hereby amended to read as follows : Sec . 15 . 04 . 030 . Duplex multifamily residential district, MR-D . is it is the purpose of the MR-D district to provide fcr a limited increase in pODulaCion densltV and allow fcr a greater variety of housing types by allowing duplex dwelling units . A. Principally pe znitt_d uses. Principally permitted uses are as follows : 1 . One (1) single-family dwelling per lot . 2 . One (1) duplex per lct . 3 . Group homes class I and T Crop and tree farming_ . S . special permit uses. the fell Owing uses are permitted provided that they cor_for to the development standards listed in section 15 . 08 . 020 : 1 . Churches . 2 . Nursery schools and Gay care centers . C. accessory uses. acc_s_cry uses are as 1 ' lows : 1 . Accessory uses and buildings customarily aururzen ant to a neritl_tted use, such aS garages , carOOrts and minor struC::ures for storage of personal prozertv. 2 . Rooming and bear••in'c C' nol.i more than three (3 ) per-sons . 3 . Customary incidental home occupations subject to the provisions of section 15 . 08 . 0a0 . 4 . Accessory dwelling unit_ cor nurnoses of t _is Section. Sec=10r_ 15 . 04 . 030 . accessory dwellina units mall not be nCluQed In CaJ culating t,' _ maximum uermitte6 dens-ty. D . Conditional users. COnci�:lcal uses are as f0 ' lcw�-: : 1 . General conditlOnal Cses listed in section 15 . 08 . 030 . 2 . Group homes class _-C, __-T_, II-B and lI-C. E . DBVeloornent stdnda' _;I_ EO'_- s_ncle family dcaellings the maximum nermitte'd density and deve10nmert S`andardS of Section 15 . 0a . 020 r=1=- inc to S7.-5 zoning d4stricts shall aorDly. 1 . Minimum lot. Min_-num lo- area is as follows : a . Single-family dwel_-ngs : Fifty-seven hundred (5 , 700) sa^sare , 5 b. Duplex (two-family dwelling unit) : Eight thousand five hundred (8 , 500) square feet . 2 . Minimum lot width. Minimum lot width is as follows : a . Single-family dwelling: Fifty (50) feet . (1) To determine minimum lot width Lor irreulr lots , a ci g a rcle of applicable diameter (the minimum lot width permitted) shall be scaled within the '! proposed boundaries of the lot , provided that an access easement to another lot is not included within the circle . b. Dup_ lex: Eighty (80) feet . 3 . Maximum site coverage. Maximum site coverage is as follows : a . Sinale-family dwelling : F1= V (50) percent . L b . Duplex: Forty (a0 ) percent . a_ . Minimum yard requirements. a. Front yard. Minimum front yard is ten (10) fEet • (1) At-, least twenty (20) feet of driveway shall be provided between any garage, car-ocrt or other primary parkins area and the street property line with the exception of an alley property line . (2) Porches and private and shared courtyard features may be built within the front building setback line . (3 ) Proposed front yards less than twenty (20) feet in depth are subject to approval by the planning director, based on review and recommendation from the public works department relative to the existing and future traffic volumes and right-of-way requirements as specif1=d in the city comprehensive transportation plan and city construction standards . b. Side yard. Minimum side yard is five (5) feet . 16 i c . Rear yard. Minimum rear yards toot . d. side yard on flar_Kina street of corner lot. Minimum side yard on the flanking street cf a corner lot is fifteen (15) feet . S . Height limitation. T::e height limitation is two and one-half (2 1/2) stories, not eXceedlnC thirty-five (35) feet . G . Interior yards. interior yards shall not be computed as Dart of t _ site coversce . 7 . Additional standards . Se_ cnupter 15 . 08 , pertaining to gener al and supplementary provisions, for _eauirements C_^,`!ce_"n1_.c accessory buildings and additional standards . 8 . N m axiunJim_nervious sL-face coverage. Maximum impervious surface is seventy (70) percent of the total lot area . a. Except -or lots us.a lcr acr_cul oral pract_ces , the maximum im:Dervlcus surface area allowed shall be to-- thousand (10 , 000) square W than one (1) acre . p . L rCheS and p'r=v and snared courtyard features may be built wit_-_in the front building setback line . 9 . Zero lot line and clL'st=rind. Minimum lot Width, building setbacks , and minim=i lot size regulations may r - modified CCnslste_nz With provisions for zero _Gt line and clustering housing development.- F . Sians . The sign regulations of chapter i5 . 06 shall apply. G. Orfstreet parking. The ofzstreez r king reQuirement5 of chapter 15 . 05 shall apply. F. Development plan review. Development plan review is required when the property to be developed is classified as view cr=er'�:v . 17 I, i SECTION 8. Section 15 . 04 . O40 , of the Kent City Code is hereby amended to read as follows : Sec. 15 . O4 . 040 . Garden density multifamily residential district, MR-G. It is the purpose of the MR-G district to provide locations ifor garden apartment densities suitable for suburban living. fly permitted uses. Prrncipall eYmitted A. prinCi r Y P�- are as follows : 1 . Single-family dwellings and two-family dwellings or duplexes . 2 . Multiple-family dwellings , including apartments and towr_hcuses . 3 . Group homes class I-A and I-3 . a . Cron or tree farming. B . Special permit uses. The following uses are permitted provide-3 that they conform to the development standards listed in section 15 . 08 . 0" : 1 . Churches . 2 . Nursery school and day care centers . C . ACCeSSOry L'SSS. p=rml=tad accessory uses are as follows : 1 . Accessory uses and buildings customarily appurtenant to a permitted use, such! as garages , carports and minor structures for storage of personal property. 2 . Rooming and boarding cf not more than three (3 ) persons . 3 . Customary incidental home occuraticns subject to the provisions of section 15 . 08 . O40 . a . offices incidental and necessary to the conduct of a principally permitted use . 5 . Accessory dwelling units . For purposes of this section . Section 1^ . 04 ..O Q • acceSSorV dwelling units shall not he included in calcu'1a`_.ing the m axlmum permitted d=nSi�V . D . Conditional uses. Condi Tonal uses are as =ollows : 1 . General cond-itional '.:ses as listed in section 15 . 03 . 030 . 13 2 . Group homes class I-C, II II-3 and II-C. E . Development StanCarCS. 1 . Single-family CwelliEgs a-2d duplexes. For si-gie- family dwellings C______ c , the maximum Dermltte6 density and develODment standards of section 15 . OS . 020 r=_l=`inc to SR-8 zoninc districts shall aDDly and for duplexes , the i max-mum permitted density =_n_d deyelcomenz standards of section 15 . 04 . 030 shall apply. 2 . Multifamily dwelling ts. Tree fcllowing shall apply to multifamily dwelling units a . Minimum lot. Minimum lot area is eight thousand five hundred ( 8 , 500) square feet f,r the first two (2 ) dwelling u-_its , and two thousand five hundred (2 , 500) square fee for ea--h additional dwelling unit . b. Minimum lot wide Minimum lot width is eighty (80) fee C . Density. Maximum density is six een (15 ) dwelling units per acre . d. Maximum site ccverac, Maximum site ccverace is fcr y-five (a ) per cnt . e . Minimum yard (1) Front yard. Mximum front yard is twenty (20) feet (2) Side yard. 7_aC_R s7de yard shall be a minimum of _en (10 ) percent of the lcz width; however, regardless Of let W1Cfn, the yard width need not be more t:-aa- t:_irty (30) feet (3 ) Rear yard. iimum rear yard is twenty (20) feet . (a) Side ya l c:: flanking street Of cor:=' lot . Minimum side yard on the flanking scree of a corner lot is fifteen (15 ) fee . f . Distances b-twe buildincs . �g (1) An inner court providing access to a double-row building shall be a minimum of twenty (20) feet . (2) The distance between principal buildings shall be at least one-half the sum of the height of both buildings ; provided, however, that in no case shall the distance be less than twelve (12) feet . I This requirement shall also apply to i portions of the same building separated from each other by a court or other cpen space . g. La_ndscaping. The landscaping requirem=_nts of chapter 15 . 07 shall apply. h. Height Limit=Lion. The height limitation is three (3) stories , not exceeding forty (40) feet . i . Additional standars . See chapter 15 . 08 , pertaining to general and supplementary provisions, for requirements concerning accessory huildings and additional s andardS . j . Mul ti famil-y transition are-as. The requireme-nts of section 15 . 08 . 215 shall apply in any multifamily transition area, which includes any pardon of a multifamily district within one hundred (100) feet of a single-family dis-rict or within one hundred (100) feet of a public street right-of-way. k. Multifamily deli= review. The requirements of section 15 . 05 . 057 shall apply to any multifamily dwelling of three (3) or more units . F . Signs. The sign regulations of chapter 15 . 06 shall apply. G. Offstreet parking. 1 . The offstreet narki__- r,eaui rcments of chapter 15 . 05 shall apply. 2 . Offstreet parking may be located in required yards except for the front ten (10) feet abutting any 20 i public right-of-way, which must be landscaped. No OffStreet parking t is permitted in the redu'red open green area. H. Development pl= review. Development plan review is i rec'uired as provided in section 15 . 09 . 010 . SECTION 9. Section 15 . 04 . 050 of the K=_nt City Code is hereby amended to read as follows : Sec . 15 . 04 . 050 . Medium density multifamily residential district, MR-M. It is the purpose Of the MR-M district to provide for loco_ions for medium density resld=nflal d=szrlcts sui BID- = for urban-suburban living. . -- - Lt ed uses Princi G11YP==it-ed u== . - l are GS follows . 1 . Single-family dwel 1 =ncs and two- am-1y awe-ling- or duplexes . 2 . Multiple-family dwellings . 3 . GrcuD acmes class I-_, I-3 and I-C. 4 . Crc-o and tree farm_nc _ S . SpeC1a1 pe=j-t Uses. -he following uses are perm_tted provided that they conform to the development szardares listed in section 15 . 08 . 0=0 : 1 . Churches /'� 2 . /+ Nursery schools and day care enters . C. ACCessO-V uses. Permitted accessory uses are as follows : 1 . Accessory uses and b1a-1di-_gs customarily appurtenant LO a permitted use, such as garages , _ Carports or minor sz.'''dcZUres for storage of personal property. 2 . Rooming and boarding of not more than three (3 ) De--sons . 3 . Customary incidental !tome occupaticns sub]eC to the provisions cf sec icn 15 . 08 . 040 . 4 . c)ffices incidental and necessary to the COnduc7: cf a permitted use . D . Conditicn_l uses. Co-_diticnal uses are as follows : 21 it 1 . General conditional uses as listed in section 15 . 06 . 030 . 2 . Groun homes class II-A, II-E and II-C. E . Develorment standards. 1 . Single-family dwellings and duplexes. For single- family dwellings -n_ _ _ l�___�, the maximum 'i Dermltted density and development standards of i section 15 . 04 . 020 relating to SZ-8 zonina 'I districts shall anDly and for dunlexes , the maxim-Lim nermitted density and development standards of section 15 . 04 . 030 shall apply. 2 . Multifamily dwelling units. The following shall apply to multifamily dwelling units : a. minimum lot. Minimum lot area is eight thousand five hundred (8 , 500) square for the first two (2 ) dwelling units, and one thousand six hundred (1 , 500) sgLar=_ feet fcr each additional dwe llin_a unit . b . Minimum lot width. Minimum lot width is eighty (80) feet . C . Density Maximum density is twenty-three (23 ) dwelling units per acre . d. Maximum site coverage. Maximum site coves-aoe is forty-five (45) percent . e . Minimum yard requirements. (1) Front yard. Minimum front yard is twenty (20) feet . (2) Side yard. Each side yard shall be a minimum of ten (10) percent of the lot width; however, regardless of lot widt'n, the yard width need not be more than thirty (30) feet . (3) Rear yard. Minimum rear yard is twenty (20) feet . (a) Side yard on flanking street cf corner lot. Minimum side yard on the flanking street of a corner lot is fifteen (15) feet . f . Distances between buildings. 22 (1) ni inner court providing access to a double-row bu11G1nu Shall be a mi-imu'm of twenty (20) feet . (2) The distance between prir. iral_ buildings shall be at least one-half the sum of the height of 'both buildings ; brcvidea, i however, that in no case shall the distance be less than twelve (1-2 ) faet . f This requirement shall also apply to DOrt10nS of t.^_e Same building SeDcrnted from each Other by a court or Other c-cen space . g. �aAdOCaplrlG'. T_--- l an_dScap i ng reOt:__reme:.= O- c'r_apter 15 . 07 shall apply. h. H_iart limitatic_ 7h= height limitation is three (3 ) St0'_`1cS , P.Ot eXCceQ1'_'.g fOS'tV (?0 ) sc_ a=FS . See chapter 1-E . C8 , pertaining to general and supplementary provi s i onS , ___ __�sireme_,ts con era_ng acCessory I lv_n and addit10n_1 S:�andards . j . Multifamily tra^s_ ic:2 areas. The reo_uiremeritS cf Section l5 . 08 . 2l5 shall apply in any multlfam=.ly t'-"ansition area, which includes any portion cf a multifamily district within one hundred (100) feet of a single-family district or within one hundred (100) feet cf a public street right-of-way. x . Mul tilamily des eview. The ream reme_ItS of section 15 . C° . G_7 shall apply to any multifamily dwe'_li- of three (3 ) cr units . F . Siar_s. The sign regulati=S of cnabter 15 . 06 shall apply. - G. Oiis tree t park- -a. 1 . The O--Street pa-"}C_nC reQu'_remenots OL c^c_pter 15 . 05 Shall aocly. 2 . Off- Street pa--kinC1 may be located In reqU4 y"ardS , exce-pt for the front ten (10 ) feet a'buttlnG 22 I i i any public right-of-way, which must be landscap_d . No offstreet parking is permitted in the reauirea open green area. H. Development plan review. Development plan review is :I required as provided in section 15 . 09 . 010 . i SECTION 10. Section 15 . 04 . 060 of the Kent City Coce is : hereby amended to read as follows : iSec . . 15 . 0a . 060 . F_igh density multifamily residential district, M.R.-H. It is the purpose of the Na-H district to provide for locations for high density residential districts suitable for urban living. A. Principally permuted uses. Princ-pally permitted uses are as follows : 1 . Single-family dwell_-=s and two-family dwellings or duplexes . 2 . Multiple-family dwellings . 3 . Group homes class 1-A , I-D and I-C . 4 . Crop and Lree LGrming . B . S-,.-c4=1 e' t L:ses. The following uses are permitted provided that they con-form to the development standards listed in section 15 . 08 . 020 . (No uses presently listed. ) C. PCCeSSOry uses. Permitted accessory uses are as follows : 1 . accessory uses and buildings customarily _ appurtenant to a PeriTtitted use , such as garages , carports or minor structures for storage of personal property. 2 . Rooming and boarding cf not more than three (3) persons 3 . Customary incidental home occL:_ations Subject to the provisions of section 15 . 08 . 040 . 4 . Cffices incidental and necessary to the conduct of a permitted use . 24 ' 5 . Accessory dwelling units . For Dur'DGses of tti- section , Section 15 . 04 . 060 . accessory dwelllinc .. L'Ln1t5 s��all not be included 1I1 Calculating the maximum permitted density . ! D . Conditional uses . Conditional uses are as follows : 1 . General conditional uses as listed in section ! 15 . 08 . 030 . T IIT 2 . Group homes class II-A, -S and II-C. E . Development standards. 1 . Sincle-family dwellings F-,-2d duplexes. For single- family dwellings __ _ __::_o , the maximum permitted density and develcpment standards of section 15 . 04 . 020 r=' --ina to SR-8 zonir_a districts shall apply and for duplex_= the Maximum Dermitted density and development standards of section _ . 04 . 030 shall apDly. 2 . Multi*a7IIily dwelling units. The following shall apply to multifamily dwelling u--iits : a . Minimt:.m 1=. Minimum lot area is eight thousand five hundred (8 , 500) square feet for the first two (3 ) dwellizq_ units, and nine hundred (900) S,—_-ar _eez' for each additicnal dwell ina unit . b. Minirumylot wider. Minimum lot width is eighty (80) C . Density. Maximum density is forty (40) dwelling units per acre . d. Maximum site cov=raye. Maximum site ccverace is fifty (50) percent . e . Minims yara r='�i:'_rcmE'nts (1) Front yard_ Minimum -front yard is twenty (2 0) fe-ct (2) Side yard. Each side yard shall be a minimum of ten (10 ) ercent of the lot width) however, recardless of lot the yard width need not be more than thirty (30) feet . (3 ) Rear yard. Minimum rear yard is twenty (20) f»r 25 't (a ) Side yard on flanking street of corner lot. Minimum side yard on the flanking street of a corner lot is fifteen (15) feet _ f . Distances between buildings. (1) An inner court providing access to a double-row building shall be a minimum i of twenty (20) feet . (2) The distance between principal buildings shall be at least one-half the sum of the height of both buildings ; provided, however, that in no case shall the distance be less than twelve (12) feet . This requirement shall also apply to portions of the Same building Separated from each other by a court or other c- space . G. Landscaping. The landscaping rec-L:irements of chapter 15 . 07 Shall apply. h. Freight limitation. The height limitation is four (4) stories , not exceeding fifty (50) feet . i . Additional standards. See chapter 15 . 08 , pertaining to General and Supplementary provisions, for requirements concerning accessory buildings and add_JtlOnial Standards . j . Multifamily transition areas. The requirements of- section 15 . 08 . 215 shall apply in any multifamily transiticn. area, which includes any portion of a multifamily district within one hundred (100) feet of a single-family district of within one hundred (100) feet of a public street right-of-way. k. Multifamily desi n review. The requirements of section 15 . 09 . Oa7 shall apply to anv multifamily dwelling of three (3 ) or more units . F . Signs . The sign regulations of chapter 15 . 06 shall apply. 26 I I G. Ofrstreet parking. 1 . The offstreet parking requirements of chapter 15 . 05 shall apply. 2 . Offstreet parking may be located in required yards, except for the front ten (10) feet abutting -1 any public right-of-way, which must be landscaped . No offstreet parking is permitted in the required cpen green area . H. Development plan review. Development plan review is required as provided in section 15 . 09 . 010 . SECTION 1I . Zorj = Map Single Family DeslQIlatinn_ Amended. The City of Kent official zoning map is h=_rehy amended by redeslg_lating the zoning districts consistent with the redesignatlon of zoning districts as set forth in this Ordinance : as follows : Former Zon- Current Zone R1-5 .0 =_ ° R1-7 . 2_ -6 R1-9 . 6 SR-4 . 5 R1-12 . 0 SR-3 R1-20 . 0 SR-2 RA SR-1 SECTION 12. Severability. If any one or more sections , sub-sections , or sentences of this ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance and the same small remain In full force and effect . 27 SECTION 13. EfF-Criy2 Date . This Ordinance shall take ' effect and be in force five (5) days from and after its passage, s� approval and publication as provided by law. JI SITE, b??YOR ATTEST: ERE A J A=O ER/CI Y CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: RO -ER A. L'u30VILi CITY ATTOZN�Y PASSED � day of 1996 . APPROVED Af day of PL3LISFED / / day of / (/Y // 0 . 1996 . 28 1 hereby certify that this is d true cODV OL Cr�iR=P,Ce NO . ,3� / 0 i Ydsse' by the City Ccu=_cil of the Cit_v OL Kenz , i i WdSlli RcrtOn, dnQ cDD_OVed by the M?VO" OL t.^_� City 0= Kent d5 hereon indicdte�. ll ERK 1504G.�� 'J Q Land Use and Planning Board Minutes October 28, 1996 Heath Harris asked for further clarification of lot coverage and questioned whether there would be a fixed ratio used to determine the allowable mix of residential to commerical. Dick Coltran questioned the abililty to subdivide the different uses for future sale. Jack Olson, 26220 108th Avenue SE, Kent, WA 98031. Mr. Olson is concerned with whether he will have the ability to develop his property. He feels mixed use could allow him better flexibilty and an opportunity to build marketably. Board member Tom Brotherton MOVED and Board member Jerry Daman SECONDED a motion to close the public hearing. Motion carried. Mr. O'Neill addressed Mr. Keppler's question regarding lot coverage. He explained that the proposed amendment would reduce lot coverage to 25% from 40% for stand alone commercial. He also stated that setbacks would be less restrictive. Mr. O'Neill explained that the Binding Site Plan process segmentation that divides condiminiums for individual sale and suggested a similar process when subdividing for future sale. Mr. O'Neill explained that the office zone would allow some retail use and the retail use is expandable with a conditional use permit. Board member Tom Brotherton MOVED to continue the deliberations to the November 25, 1996 Planning Board meeting at 7:00 p.m. The motion was SECONDED by Board member David Malik. Motion carried. #7C'A 96 6 SINGLE FAA Y DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS (F. Satterstrom) Planning Manager Fred Satterstrom explained that the single family development standards had been recently amended by Ordinances 3268 and 3290. Mr. Satterstrom explained that it was staff s intention to reduce the standards and promote in-fill development. The single family zoning districts were renamed establishing maximum permitted density. A problem was brought to the attention of the Planning Department when an applicant tried to subdivide and couldn't. Staff is recommending to calculate the maximum permitted density without rounding. Mr. Satterstrom described the individual changes as referenced in the staff report. He also clarified that the reason no change was recommended for the SR-1 zone was that this zone was not effected. Chair Steve Dowell asked the Board if there were any questions for Mr. Satterstrom. Board member Ron Harmon MOVED and Board member Tom Brotherton SECONDED a motion to open the public hearing. Motion carried. 6 #ZCA-96-5 Mixed Use Zoning #ZCA-96-6 Single Family Development Standards Land Use and Planning Board Minutes October 28, 1996 Jim Flick, 9408 S 218th Street. Mr. Flick described his situation and explained that he is currently unable to subdivide his property. He requested that the Board make a recommendation to accept staff s proposed changes. Board member Ron Harmon MOVED to close the public hearing. The motion was SECONDED by Board member Tom Brotherton. Motion carried. Ron Harmon MOVED to recommend to City Council that they approve the staff recommended changes to the maximum permitted densities in the single family zones. The motion was seconded by Vice Chair Brad Bell. Motion carried. 7 4ZCA-96-5 Mixed Use Zoning ,ZCA-96-6 Single Family Development Standards Kent City Council Meeting Date November 5 , 1996 Category Bids 1. SUBJECT: SE 274TH WAY HILLCLIMB SECTION (GREEN RIVER ROAD TO 108TH AVENUE SE) GROUND IMPROVEMENTS 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Bid opening for this project was held on November 14th with 4 bids received. The low bid was submitted by Hayward Baker, Inc. of Santa Paula, California, in the amount of $117 , 500 . The Engineer' s estimate was $120, 000. The project consists of ground improvements on approximately 1/2 acre of land by the alternate method of either Alternate I deep dynamic compaction, or Alternate II stone columns, for the preparation of the roadway bridge over the Green River. It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director that the SE 274th Way Hillclimb Section (Green River Road to 108th Ave. SE) Ground Improvements, Alternate II Stone Columns contract be awarded to Hayward Baker, Inc. for the bid amount of $117 , 500. 3 . EXHIBITS: Public Works Director memorandum 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Director (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $117 , 500 SOURCE OF FUNDS: 272nd/277th Street Corridor Project 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds that the SE 274th Way Hillclimb Section (Green River Road to 108th Avenue SE) Ground Improvements, Alternate II Stone Columns contract be awarded to Hayward Baker, Inc. for the bid amount of $117 , 500 . DISCUSSION• ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 5A DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC: WORKS November 14, 1996 TO: Mavor & City Council FROM: Don Wickstrom 66 RE: SE 274th Way Hillclimb Section (Green River Road to 108th Ave SE) Ground Improvements Bid opening for this project was held on November 14 with 4 bids received. The low bid was submitted by Havward Baker, Inc. in the amount of S 1 17,500.00 for Alternate II, Stone Columns. The engineer's estimate for Alternate 11 was $120,000.00. It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director that the SE 27401 Way Hillclimb (Green River Road to 108th Ave SE) Ground Improvements, Alternate If contract be awarded to Havward Baker, Inc., for the bid amount of $ 1 17,500.00 BID SUMMARY Alternate 11 Alternate 1 Hayward Baker, Inc. 117,500.00 Frank Coluccio 179,500.00 Robison Construction 190,590.00 Gaston Bros. 198,600.00 Engineer's Estimate 120,000.00 Engineer's Estimate 173,600.00 MOTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds that the SE 274th Wav Hillclimb (Green River Road to 108th Ave SE) Ground linprovenients, Alternate II contract be awarded to Hav-yard Balcer. Inc., for the bid amount of S 1 17,500.00 CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS A. R E P O R T S A. COUNCIL PRESIDENT B. OPERATIONS COMMITTEE C. PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE D. PLANNING COMMITTEE E. PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE F. PARKS COMMITTEE G. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS CITY OF KENT PARKS COMMITTEE MEETING NOVEMBER 511996 Council Present: Chair substitute Christie Houser: Connie Epperly, Jon Johnson Staff Present: John Hodgson; Lori Hogan, Barbara Ekstrom, Helen Wickstrom, Laurie Evezich, Helen Wickstrom, Jim McDonald, Lori Hogan, Tracey Wickersham, Teri Petrole-Stump Others Present: Jennifer Stoner: Carol Mauritsen; Donna Pfingston; Drew Pfingston; Cindy Mauritsen; Aggie Mauritsen; Linda Johnson: Kent Downtown Partnership/Saturday Market; Candv Howard, Saturday Market; Carol McPherson, Arts Commission; Jim Stone, S.S.M.D. Christie Houser substituted for Judy Woods in her absence. Saturday Market Report: Candy Howard, Coordinator of the Kent Saturday Market distributed a final report and revenue comparison for the 1996 season. This was the first year the market was open Saturday and Sunday. Candy explained revenue was down $3,329 compared to 1995 because of 20 less spaces at Cornucopia and inclement weather. Results of a vendor survey for 1996 will be submitted to the Parks Department. The market will remain in the parking lot for the 1997 season and will not be moving into the building until funding for renovation has been secured. Salt Air Hills Vista Park: Helen Wickstrom stated that several years ago the City acquired two acres from a King County Conservation Futures Grant to develop the Salt Air Hills site. Colie Hough-Beck of Hough-Beck & Baird was hired to develop a master plan of the park. Prior to master planning, a citizen advisory committee met twice and a public meeting was held to collect a list of the needs and wants of the community. Using dots to represent desired park amenities, an enthusiastic group of 30-35 neighbors participated. Colie outlined their requests: Preserve pea patch. Construct new large play area with visibility to the street. surrounded by hard surface for roller blades, boards and bikes. Provide an open shelter. Include one open area for mixed play. Maintain the forest, but prune and thin, with a trail looping around the park. Create a plaza area. Install interpretive signage at the wetland area. Re-name the park to Salt Air Hills Vista Park. The plan respects the site and environment and eventually will adjoin the City of Des Moines park which borders the site. Parks Committee Minutes November 5, 1996 Page Two Connie Epperly moved to accept the proposed Salt Air Hills Vista Park Master Plan. Jon Johnson seconded. Motion passed 3-0. 1997 Citv Art Plan Budget and 1997 - 2001 Five-Year Art Plan: Jim McDonald, Cultural Services Program Coordinator introduced Carol McPherson. Chair of the Kent Arts Commission. Jim stated the budget for the City Art Program projects must be prepared, updated and accepted by City Council annually. The proposed projects were summarized: Develop a Centennial Center glass exhibit by hiring a professional artist, or team, to design, create and install artwork specifically for the City of Kent and the site. Working with and commemorating the rich history of the Japanese-American community, the grounds of the historical Bereiter House may be the site for an exterior art project. Continuing the City's interest in supporting art projects created by youth working with artists, three Reclamation Art Projects will be completed. The site and content to be determined by the youth in cooperation with the artist and the Parks Department staff. Continue to purchase high quality artwork (portable artwork) from the Canterbury Faire Juried Fine Art Exhibit to be exhibited in public accessible areas within the City of Kent. Within the 1997-2001 City Art Plan, Jim highlighted that funding includes planning for the Performing Arts Center in 1999. and artwork for the Center in the year 2000. Carol commented how pleased they were with the Japanese community sharing their background, history and what they want and don't want for the community art project. She added the youth art program had a very strong focus generating a lot of interest from teens. Working with an artist as a mentor, the youth are motivated to naive back to the community. Connie Epperly moved to accept the 1997 City Art Plan Budget and 1997 - 2001 Five-Year Art Plan. Jon Johnson seconded. Motion passed 3-0. Riverbend Golf Complex Management Study Program Report: John Hodgson reported the Task Force has met three times. It is going very well, with a good cross section of golfers and non-golfers, but they are not readv to make a recommendation as yet. He added that a special Parks Committee meeting will be scheduled in November to present the Task Force's final report. Jon Johnson stated the Task Force meeting on November 7 will conclude with a final recommendation. Meeting adjourned at 5:00 p.m. to Executive Session. Final Report 1996 Kent Market Season: November 5, 1996 Parks Committee This was the first year the Market was open on Sundays and we feel it was a success. On our best Sunday we had 70 vendors and our worst we had no vendors. We offered free space when weather was poor or as an incentive to bring in vendors We found that the vendors on Sundays were not repeat vendors from Saturday but a totally new set of vendors We also observed that we had more local farmers and flower vendors on Sundays. We will send a survev to all of the vendors that oarticinated in the Market this season to evaluate the length of the season. We increased the season this vear based on the survey for 1995 We will use the results to guide the season for 1997 We are actively pursuing the funding for the Market building on Railroad Ave N. We do not feel that we will be ready to occupy the new location next season. Our intention is to remain in our current location for the 1997 season Our Total revenues for 1996 were S39,732 We fell behind 1995 by 53,329; we can account for 51,700 of the lost revenue in the 20 less spaces available at Cornucopia. We also fell that the li plus weeks of rain and 3 weetis of close to 100 degree weather did effect the Market in a negative wav 1 he City of Kent will receive 55,000 above the 525,000 contract. Kent Downtown Partnership w111 receive the reaming balance of 59,732 from the City of Kent in compliance with our contract Overall we feel the Market was a success and we will spend the next few months out recruiting new vendors for the 1997 season Thank you for your continued support. Candy Howard, Market Coordinator Kent Downtown Partnership Linda Johnson, Executive Director Kent Downtown Partnership Kent Market i 1995/1996 Comparison Date Weekly Total Dace Weekly Total Revenue Revenue 4/13/96 S5998 S5998 4/20/96 $864 S6863 4/27/96 S914 S7776 4/'_9/95 $8417 58417 5/4/96 S1300 S9076 5/6/95 $2086 $10503 5/11/96 $1656 S10732 5/13/95 S1724 $12227 5/18/96 S821 511553 5/20/95 S1369 S13796 5/25/96 S 1583 S 13136 5/27/95 S 1631 S 15427 6/1/96 S1925 $15061 6l3/95 S1833 S17260 6/8/96 S3910 S18971 6/10/95 S2625 S19885 6/15/96 S2843 S2184 L 6/17/96 S335 7 $23242 6/22/96 S1833 S27,6714 6/24/96 S2939 S26181 6/29/96 S2009 S25683 7/1/95 S2071 S28252 7/6/96 S2936 S28619 7/8/95 52440 530692 Cornucopia S991 S29610 7/15/95 Sll83 S31875 7/20/96 S907 S30517 Cornucopia 7i27/96 51220 S31737 7-'29i°.5 S1193 S33168 8/3/96 S685 532420 Si5/95 S644 S33812 8/lo/96 S1003 S33423 8/12/95 S733 S34545 8/17/96 S1008 S34431 8/19/95 S984 S35529 8/24/96 51055 S35486 8/26%9 St139 S36668 8/31/96 S732 S36218 9/2/96 S926 S3 7594 9/7/96 S662 $36880 9/9/95 S1045 S38639 9/14/96 S287 S37167 9/16/95 S1003 S39642 9/21/96 S528 S37695 9/23/95 SL113 S-107 9/28/96 S750 S38445 9/30/95 S521 S41276 10/5/96 S315 S38760 10/7/95 S771 S42047 10/12/96 S436 S39196 10/11I95 S1014 S43061 10/19/96 S183 S39379 10/26/96 S353 S39732 (3329) I i }� �twAne�ew„e: USE F. PUBLIC MEETING �E M NOVEMBER 13, 1996 7 :00 p.m. KENT SENIOR CENTER zP, The City of Kent has recently purchased the historical a ea a kfµ 1907 lack Keck residence, located at 855 E Smith Street. The firm of Tonkin/Hoyne/Lokan, an architecture and urban design firm, has been hired by the City to review various use <x� options for the house and to determine improvements needed to meet code compliance for the various options. While we want to preserve this beautiful, historical home for public enjoyment, we also want to be a good neighbor and would like to share ideas with you and receive your input. Please join us on Wednesday, November 13, 1996, 7:00 p.m. in the Dry Crafts Room of the Kent Senior Center I to discuss the future use of this historical facility. The Kent Senior Center is located at 600 East Smith. x If you have any questions, or can't make the meeting and would like to give input over the phone, please contact Helen Wickstrom at 859-3994 or John Hodgson at 859-3992. hs005647 10126/96 BRENDAJACOBER (Please put in Council agenda CITY of packet) Jim White, Mavor CITY COUNCIL PLANNING COMMITTEE NIINUTES October 15, 1996 Planning_Committee Members Present: City Attornev's Office Leona Orr, Chair Laurie Evezich Tim Clark Jon Johnson Planning Staff Jim Harris, Planning Director Fred Satterstrom, Planning Manager Lin Houston. Human Services Manager Margaret Porter, Administrative Assistant III HEARING EXAMINER DECISION APPEAL PROCESS - (L. Evezich) Assistant City Attomey Ms. Evezich presented the Committee with a copy of a draft Ordinance relating to the judicial appeal process of the Hearing Examiner's decisions. The proposed amendments would bring the appeal procedures for the Kent Hearing Examiner in compliance with the new state law requirement under the Land Use Petition Act (LUPA). The LUPA provides a statutory appeal period of twenty-one days. The original intention behind the LUPA was to expedite land use appeals and matters that could be defined as land use decisions under that statute and to coordinate that process with regulatory reform which is also passed in 1995. This will be the first step of a two part process in bringing the City into compliance with both LUPA and regulatory reform. Committee member Tim Clark MOVED and Committee member Jon Johnson SECONDED the motion to recommend approval of the draft Ordinance with the proposed amendments to the judicial appeal process of the City of Kent Hearing Examiner and forward this item to the November 5 City Concil meeting. Motion carried. Ms. Evezich informed the Committee that there will be other related amendments necessary to bring our policies in compliance with LU`PA. These additional amendments will require a public hearing and the recommendation of the Land Use and Planning Board for further action. HUMAN SERVICES MITIGATION FOR REGIONAL .TUSTICE CENTER (L. Houston) Human Services Planner Lin Houston presented the Committee with an update on the status of the Human Services mitigation agreement relating to the impacts of the Regional Justice Center. King County has given the Ciry of Kent money to evaluate the impacts of the Regional Justice Center on the nonprofit human services delivery system and to develop a standardized data collection system for agencies. 1204th \VF SO. KENT W>S111NGT0N 48077_ 55.TELEPHONE FdX x s5U-1431 City Council Planning Committee Minutes October 15, 1996 The Planning Department is in the process of hiring a consultant. The consultant will be responsible for conducting a study in two phases. Phase One will be completed prior to the RJC opening and Phase Two will begin one year after the Regional Justice Center opens. Phase One is scheduled to begin on December 2 and conclude February 29, 1997. Phase One will set up a data collection process and methodology to enable agencies to measure the impact of the RJC on human servicves delivery. It will consist of the following: • Identifying the types of services impacted and determine the geographic boundaries of the study. • Collaborate with agencies to determine the best method to collect and report the needed data to assess any impacts. • Develop an application for agencies to seek compensation for services. The County will provide funding for the City to reimburse agencies for services related to the RJC. The funding is provided through the Inmates Benefit Fund and will range from a minimum of $38,000 to a maximum of$75,600 a year. The annual dollar amount is calculated based on the Average Daily Population of the Regional Justice Center. Phase Two will determine how effectively the human services system is serving users from the RJC and will identify any gaps in service. This process will be repeated after three years to assess how well the RJC is addressing the human services needs of its population. Ms. Houston indicated that the draft Consultant Contract would be ready for the November 19 Planning Committee meeting and requested that the contract be forwarded the same night to the City Council for consideration. Chair Orr requested that Ms. Houston provide the full Council a copy of the Consultant Contract for their review prior to the Council meeting on November 19. POLICY FOR AGRIGULTURAL PRESERVATION - (L. Orr/J. Harris) Chair Orr recommended that the City draft a policy that would illistrate the City's support for the preservation of farmlands. The City is in the process of annexing a portion of property that is included in King County's Agriculture Preservation District. Mr. Harris agreed that a policy depicting the City's stand on this issue could be beneficial. Tim Clark questioned whether the City would need to develop a long detailed policy or if a general policy would be effective. Mr. Harris responded that the Planning Department could develop some drafts for the Committee to consider and then decide how detailed the policy would need to be. Mr. Harris indicated that a general statement could be sufficient: however, to ensure the policy is effective the policy should be specific. The Committee concluded that the City needs a definite policy to demonstrate the City's stand on Agricultural Preservation. Mr. Harris agreed to present the Committee with some policy alternatives at the November 19 meeting. City Council Planning Committee Minutes October 15, 1996 ALLOWANCE OF MOTHER-IN-LAW APARTMENTS - (L. Orr) Chair Orr suggested that the City relook at the Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) Ordinance which allows for mother-in-law apartments. She discussed the issue of units already in existence which do not quite meet the development standards. She believes that the Land Use and Planning Board needs to take a look at the Zoning Code and make a determination if there is some way to make amendments or modifications to the Ordiance in order to help these "Grandfathered in' dwelling units. Chair Orr is asking for the Committee's concurrence to ask the Planning Board to take this item under consideration. Committee member Tim Clark indicated that he would like to make this a working policy. Clark MOVED to send this item to the Land Use and Planning Board for their consideration. Committe member Johnson SECONDED the motion. Planning Director Jim Harris explained that the Land Use and Planning Board is in the process of considering administrative variance procedures. These procedures would allow an administrative variance from the Planning Director and make it easier for applicants to get a small amount of relief. Harris believes that Accessory Dwelling Units could dovetailed appropriately into the Administrative Variance item already under consideration by the Planning Board. The Committee concurred. Motion carried. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 4:25 p.m. U\DOCTCOM\MINUTESTCO1015_MIN 41 PUBLIC WOR1<-S COMMITTEE Novrnibrr 6, 1996 PRESENT: Jon Johnson Dori Wickstrom Connie Epperly Tom Brubaker ABSENT: Tim Clark Judv Woods Stonegate Knolls Plat Tom Brubaker noted at the last Committee meeting there was extended discussion regarding the provision of emergency access to Stonegate Knolls . The basic information as provided, is that some progress has been made although there has been no Final decision reached on the emergency access by the developer and some of the adjoining property owners. There may be a solution in the %works however, there is no other information provided at this time. Brubaker suggested that this the item be deferred until such time as staff deems it necessary to return it to this Committee. Committee concurred. Up Front Street Improvements vs No Protest LID Covenants Wickstrom stated that this issue emerged with the creation of L.I.D. 345 (21 Sth Street Improvement) and there are questions of whether we should require developers to du up front improvements, which we have been doing, or require them to execute covenants. He said we have been doing it both ways. Wickstrom said what we do is very similar to what occurs in Renton, Tukwila, Auburn and Federal Way. However we have more flexibilitv of when to defer the improvements. Wickstrom noted that we have been able to put together approximately S32 million worth of projects by using what we have been doing in the past - essentially if there are major arterials anticipated for improvements we typically required covenants versus the up-front improvements. The covenants that we do require are just deferrals - a ten vear deferral at the maximum and at the end of 10 vears if there are no LID projects, the propertv owner must put in those improvements. Wickstrom said the issue here is, do we continue to grant deferrals or do we require hard improvements up front along with the building permit. Lately our trend has been to require up front improvements because we are dealing with alot of plats, short plats and single family residences primarily in the East Hill area. He noted that 1 we have been more successful with LIDS in the industrial, commercial and multi-family properties. In the past 27 years we have never formed a street improvement for a residential area. They are not palatable with the residents and they are not successful when brought before Council. Lately we have required more up front improvements rather than the LID covenants. Jon Johnson stated that he has always been favorable towards the up front street improvements because it solves problems at the time of the plat, basically not having to retrofit something later on. With regard to arterials, Wickstrom noted when we don't know how the alignment will fit and when we try to match piece-meal improvements, sometimes we have to design it to fit what's existing and in the long run it will change. When we look at all the roads we have built, most of those arterials are in now and have been built with the support of LIDS. Our trend is towards hard improvements up front. Wickstrom suggested that a formal form of policy from Council be given to direct uS to require up front improvements. Brubaker stated that he will draft a Resolution for review and approval at the next Committee meeting. Permit Parking Ordinance Amendment Brubaker stated that the purpose of this Ordinance is to transfer authority to issue parking permits in the Centennial Center and City Hall from the Transportation Engineer to the Facilities Manager. During the discussion of this ordinance at the last Conunittee iueeting, Leona Orr pointed out that this draft Ordinance established a 30 minute parking limit for the parking area between the Centennial Center and City Hall, which she found to be unacceptable. Brubaker stated there is no reason to continue with this 30 minute limit and it will be stricken from the Ordinance. Committee unanimously recommended approving the draft ordinance with the amendment of striking Section 9.38.080 Sub-Section 8 from the Ordinance. Code Revision Brubaker said there is a Public Works provision in the City Code which states that Public Works projects shall comply with the 1988 version of the Washington State Dept of Transportation Standards Specifications for Roads, Bridges and Highways. This section should reference the latest version. Committee unanimously recommended that the City_ Attorney amend Section 6.02.010 of the City Code to incorporate the latest revision of the Wa State Specifications. Added items: Saar Street Vacation Wickstrom asked for Committee's concurrence that when the money for this street vacation is received, that it be deposited into the School Pedestrian Walkways fund. Committee unanimously concurred. S 218th Street Landscaping (LID 345) Mrs. Rust of 8619 S. 2 l Sth St. asked who was responsible for landscaping now that the S. 218th Street improvements are complete. Wickstrom said the Planning Dept requires property owners to landscape their property to the edge of the pavement. He said when we build a road, often times we require additional right of way from the property owner. When we remove the landscaping, it has been the practice that those properties become nonconfonning with respect to their landscaping and they are not required to restore it. Meeting adjourned: 4:20 p.m. 3