HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Meeting - Council - Agenda - 10/15/1996 FFFF
City of Kent
City Council . -Meetming
Agenda
CITY OF
d�91�IIC�5��
Mayor Jim White
Council Members
Christi Houser, President
Jim Bennett Jon Johnson
Tim Clark Leona Orr
Connie Epperly Judy Woods
October 15, 1996
Office of the City Clerk
CITY OF� '3
1
SUMMARY AGENDA
KENT CITY COUNCIL MEETING
October 15, 1996
Council Chambers
7 : 00 p.m.
MAYOR: Jim White COUNCILMEMBERS: Christi Houser, President
Jim Bennett Tim Clark Connie Epperly
Jon Johnson Leona Orr Judy Woods
CALL TO ORDER .
ROLL CALL AddZrr�
1. PUB OMMUNICATIONS
V A. Regional Justice Center Update Qob w
L TFF a hoc T-TrnTcinn R' n a
V B. V -`FZZv—rrx=vxa (_on InW
. � ent Performing Arts Center Update S1 � Shoff
D. Proclamation - Make A Difference Day
E. Zroclamation - Kentshire Miniature Cattle Day
arbuf- IJar l - InJ,f-ah&?i t-v qlo /Isku (OacAttc, Trade
2 . PUBLIC HEARINGS
None
3 . CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Approval of Minutes
B. Approval of Bills
C.v 1997 Budget - Set Hearing Date
D.v Canterbury Greens Preliminary Plat SU-96-4 - Set Meeting
Date
E.✓ Neighborhood Traffic Control Plan - Concurrence with
Existing Plan
F.V Meeker Street Sidewalks - Acceptance
G.V Boeing Donation - Accept and Establish Budget
H.% Master Gardener Grant - Accept and Establish Budget
I.%• Firearms and Weapons in Parks - Ordinance
J." Surplus House Demolition - Accept as Complete
K. v Council Absence - Clark
4 . OTHER BUSINESS
A.� utility Tax/Sunset Extension - Ordinance
FCd o+a` � Ge-r+iYc�t�t Ohc�^�'
5 . ID$ RJC - Re so IA tio-v%
None
6. CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS
7 . REPORTS
**** EXECUTIVE SESSION - Pending Litigation
8 . ADJOURNMENT
NOTE: A copy of the full agenda packet is available for perusal in
the City Clerk' s Office and the Kent Library.
An explanation of the agenda format is given on the back of
this page.
Any person requiring a disability accommodation should contact the
City in advance for more information. For TDD relay service call
1-800-635-9993 or the City of Kent (206) 854-6587 .
PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
Citizens wishing to address the Council will, at this time,
make known the subject of interest, so all may be properly
heard.
A) Regional Justice Center Update
B) Kent Affordable Housing Task Force Report
C) Kent Performing Arts Center Update
D) Proclamation - Make A Difference Day
E) Proclamation - Kentshire Miniature Cattle Day
CONSENT CALENDAR
3 . City Council Action• /
Councilmember _moves, Councilmember
seconds that Consent Calendar Items A through K be approved.
Discussion
Action
3A. Approval of Minutes.
Approval of the minutes of the regular Council meeting of
October 1, 1996 .
3B. Approval of Bills.
Approval of payment of the bills received through September 30
and paid on September 30 after auditing by the Operations
Committee on October 2 , 1996 .
Approval of checks issued for vouchers:
Date Check Numbers Amount
9/30/96 174396-174999 $4 , 281, 831. 51
Approval of checks issued for payroll for September 16 through
September 30 and paid on September 30, 1996 :
Date Check Numbers Amount
9/30/96 Checks 214766-215075 $ 250, 072 . 60
9/30/96 Advices 38660-39111 $ 579 , 037 . 54
$ 829 , 110. 14
Council Agenda
Item No. 3 A-B
Kent, Washington
October 1, 1996
Regular meeting of the Kent City Council was called to order at
7 : 00 p.m. by Mayor Pro Tem Johnson. Present: Councilmembers
Clark, Epperly, Orr and Woods, Director of Operations/Chief of
Staff McFall, City Attorney Lubovich, Planning Director Harris,
Public Works Director Wickstrom, Fire Chief Angelo, Police Chief
Crawford, Parks Director Hodgson. Councilmembers Bennett and
Houser were excused from the meeting. Approximately 20 people
were in attendance.
PUBLIC Employee of the Month. Mayor Pro Tem Johnson
COMMUNICATIONS announced that Mary Lou Becker of the Parks
Department has been selected as the Employee of
the Month for October. He noted that Ms. Becker
is an Office Tech III at the Special Populations
Resource Center, and that she answers calls for
seven people, is the liaison between the Resource
Center and the public, handles the budget, and is
a listener to citizens with special needs. He
added that she is cheerful, helpful and patient.
Parks Director Hodgson stated that Mary Lou is an
inspiration, and expressed his appreciation for
all she gives. Ms . Becker responded that she
finds pleasure in her work and enjoys the people
in the Parks Department. She thanked those who
nominated her, and accepted the Employee of the
Month plaque.
Fire Prevention Week. Mayor Pro Tem Johnson read
a proclamation noting that smoke detectors cut
the risk of dying in a fire nearly in half, and
declared the week of October 6-12 , 1996 , as Fire
Prevention Week in the City of Kent. He urged
citizens to participate in fire prevention
activities at home, work, and school and to test
their detectors.
Fire Chief Angelo noted that while fires cost
money, fire prevention pays dividends. He
encouraged the community to work with the Fire
Department on fire prevention. He also urged
citizens to replace the batteries in their fire
detectors when they change their clocks at the
end of the month.
CONSENT WOODS MOVED that Consent Calendar Items A through
CALENDAR S be approved. Clark seconded and the motion
carried.
MINUTES (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3A)
Approval of Minutes. APPROVAL of the minutes of
the regular Council meeting of September 17 ,
1996 .
1
October 1, 1996
HEALTH & (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3K)
SANITATION Little Bend. AUTHORIZATION to accept the bill of
sale for the plat of Little Bend submitted by
Lakeridge Development, Inc. for continuous opera-
tion and maintenance of 1, 616 feet of water main,
1, 546 feet of sanitary sewer, 11195 feet of storm
sewers, 1, 646 feet of street improvements, and
release of bonds after expiration period, as
recommended by the Public Works Director. This
project is located at 118th Avenue S.E. and S . E.
268th Street.
SEWER (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3R)
Beck Short Plat Sewer Extension. AUTHORIZATION
to accept the bill of sale for Beck Short Plat
Sewer Extension submitted by Kenneth and Lois
Beck for continuous operation and maintenance of
165 . 4 feet of sanitary sewer improvements, and
release of bonds after expiration period, as
recommended by the Public Works Director. This
project is located at 22840 96th Avenue South.
TRAFFIC (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3L)
CONTROL S.E. 208th Agreement with Ring County.
AUTHORIZATION for the Mayor to sign the S.E.
208th Street Improvement Agreement with King
County, as recommended by the Public Works
Committee. The Agreement requires the City to
reimburse the County on an amortized basis upon
annexing the area, the cost for improving S. E.
208th Street from 116th Avenue S . E. to 132nd
Avenue S. E. to five lanes plus sidewalks etc. In
conjunction therewith, the County is required, at
their expense, to widen with amenities, S. E.
240th Street from 132nd Avenue S . E. to 139th
Avenue S. E. (Meridian County Club entrance) ,
construct a new fish passable Socs Creek crossing
of S .E. 256th Street westerly of 148th Avenue
S . E. , pay half of the cost of replacing the S. E.
256th Street flume with a fish passible facility
and repair the 3rd Avenue Green River bridge.
STREET (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3F)
VACATIONS Street Vacation - Saar/Railroad Ave. ADOPTION of
Resolution No. 1483 setting November 5 , 1996, as
the hearing date for the Saar/Railroad Avenue
Street Vacation, as recommended by the Public
Works Committee.
The Public Works Department has received a re-
quest from Mary A. Hofling to vacate a portion of
Saar Street at Railroad Avenue.
2
October 1, 1996
STREET (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3Q)
VACATIONS Russell Road street Vacation. ADOPTION of
Ordinance No. 3316 vacating a portion of Russell
Road. Council recently approved this street
vacation subject to the applicant first ful-
filling certain conditions, all of which have
been met. Accordingly, it is now appropriate to
pass this ordinance to vacate this part of
Russell Road.
REZONE (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3C)
Van Doren's Landing Building I Rezone RZ-96-4 .
ADOPTION of Ordinance No. 3313 rezoning approxi-
mately 11 . 93 acres from M1, Industrial Park
District to M1-C, Industrial Park District "C"
suffix.
POLICE (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3M)
Corrections Facility Food Service Contract.
AUTHORIZATION to extend the Food Service Contract
at the Kent Corrections Facility. Consolidated
Food Management, Inc. has been providing food
service at the Kent Corrections Facility since
approximately 1990 . The contract with them will
expire on December 31, 1996 , and they have
requested extension of the contract for an
additional year. Staff has been very pleased
with the service provided by Consolidated Food
Management and extension of the contract through
December 1997 is recommended.
(CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3N)
Contract with City of Federal Way for Housing of
Inmates . AUTHORIZATION for the Mayor to sign a
contract with the City of Federal Way for housing
a guaranteed minimum of 20 inmates at the Kent
Corrections Facility. This contract was negoti-
ated in an attempt to replace revenues lost by
the opening of the U. S . Marshals ' own facility.
Revenue anticipated through this contract will be
approximately $425 , 000 .
(CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 30)
Boating Safety Program Application.
AUTHORIZATION for the Mayor to sign a Boating
Safety Program application. The Kent Police
Department was invited to submit an application
to obtain boating program approval. This program
allows for approved agencies to be eligible for a
percentage of the monies received for recrea-
tional boat registration fees in their county.
Monies received through this program must be
3
October 1, 1996
POLICE deposited in a dedicated account and can only be
used for boating safety program activities. This
is the application process only and in no way
guarantees approval to be eligible for these
funds. The application, however, does require
signature of the Mayor.
(CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3P)
Bureau of Justice Assistance Block Grant
Application. APPROVAL of the application for
Block Grant Funds from the Bureau of Justice
Assistance, as requested by the Police
Department. A preliminary application was
prepared and submitted electronically to meet
the required grant application deadline. The
request is for equipment and computer software,
the majority of which will focus on training.
The grant requires a 10% matching cash contribu-
tion and the grant itself picks up the remaining
90% . The total amount will be $61, 030 , with a
90% grant portion of $54 , 927 and a 10% city match
of $6 , 103 .
The State of Washington Department of Community,
Trade and Economic Development advised they were
in support of the City, s proposal and have ad-
vised the Police Department to submit the request
directly to the Bureau of Justice for approval
and funding.
(OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4B)
Compression Brakes. A citizen who resides near
Military Road on the West Hill asked the City to
consider outlawing the use of compression brakes
within the City limits because of the extremely
high noise levels they generate. After review
and consideration by the Public Works and Public
Safety Committees, the proposed ordinance makes
use of compression brakes unlawful in the City of
Kent.
WOODS MOVED to adopt Ordinance No. 3317 , which
makes the use of compression brakes in the City
of Kent unlawful. Epperly seconded and the
motion carried.
FIRE (OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4A)
Disaster Reimbursement Funds. The Emergency
Management Unit of the Kent Fire Department has
been successful in recovering funds from State
and Federally declared disasters. In order to
4
October 1, 1996
FIRE help departments accurately plan for and reflect
their expenditures, staff requests that the
latest and all future disaster funds be accepted
into a revenue account and then appropriately
distributed to the respective departments' expen-
diture accounts. Any other proposed distribution
of funds would come through the appropriate
Council committee. The Public Safety Committee
would continue to be briefed as to the amount of
funds recovered from disasters .
WOODS MOVED that the Fire Chief be authorized to
have the $5, 209 and all future State and Federal
Disaster Reimbursement Funds first placed in a
revenue account and then appropriately distri-
buted to the respective departments' expenditure
account. Orr seconded and the motion carried.
PLANNING (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3H)
Junk Vehicles. ADOPTION of Ordinance No. 3315
amending Chapter 8 . 08 of the Kent City Code
relating to junk vehicles, as recommended by the
Planning Committee.
(CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3J)
Amendment to Countywide Planning Policies.
ADOPTION of Resolution No. 1484 ratifying the
Countywide Planning Policies as recommended by
the Planning Committee, and as adopted by King
County in Ordinance No. 12421.
COUNCIL (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3E)
Council Absence. APPROVAL of an excused absence
from the October 1, 1996 , City Council meeting
for Council President Houser, as she is unable to
attend.
(CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3S)
(ADDED BY COUNCILMEMBER ORR)
Council Absence. APPROVAL of an excused absence
for Councilmember Bennett, who is unable to
attend tonight's meeting.
BUDGET (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3D)
1997 PreliminarV Budget. AUTHORIZATION to set
October 15, 1996 , at 5 : 30 p.m. as the date
and time for a Council Workshop on the 1997
Preliminary Budget.
5
October 1, 1996
FINANCE (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3B)
Approval of Bills. APPROVAL of payment of the
bills received through September 16 and paid on
September 16, 1996. The Operations Committee
meeting scheduled for September 18 , 1996, was
cancelled. Vouchers signed and approved at the
Council meeting of September 17, 1996 .
Approval of checks issued for vouchers:
Date Check Numbers Amount
9/16/96 173775-174395 $2 , 137 , 763 . 42
Approval of checks issued for payroll for
September 1 through September 15 , and paid on
September 20, 1996 .
Date Check Numbers Amount
9/20/96 Checks 214462-214765 $ 260, 297 . 37
9/20/96 Advices 38211-38659 $ 594 , 388 . 88
$ 854 , 686 . 25
(CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3G)
Utility Tax/Sunset Concurrence. ADOPTION of
Ordinance No. 3314 . The utility tax presently
sunsets in April of 2002 and the Six Year Plan
goes to the end of 2002 . It has been recommended
by the Public Works Committee to adopt an ordi-
nance extending the Sunset Clause until December
2006, which will allow time to address all the
issues and still remain in concurrency.
(CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3I)
Regional Justice Center Mitigation Agreement
Funds. AUTHORIZATION to establish a budget
for $200, 000 received from King County related
to the Regional Justice Center Human services
Mitigation agreement, and approval to expend the
funds .
REPORTS operations Committee. Johnson noted that the
Committee will meet at 4 : 30 p.m. on October 2nd.
Public Works Committee. Clark noted that the
Committee will meet at 3 : 30 p.m. October 2nd.
Planning Committee. Orr noted that the Committee
will meet at 4 : 00 p.m. on October 15th.
6
October 1, 1996
EXECUTIVE At 7 : 12 p.m. , McFall reminded Council of an
SESSION executive session of approximately 15 minutes to
discuss negotiations for property acquisition.
FIRE DEPT. The meeting reconvened at 7 : 37 p.m. WOODS MOVED
to accept the tentative agreed upon transfer
of assets from King County Fire Protection
District #37 under the conditions listed in
the October 1st memorandum from Brent McFall,
Director of Operations. Orr seconded and the
motion carried.
ADJOURNMENT There was no further business and the meeting
adjourned at 7 : 38 p.m.
Brenda Jack er, CMC
City Clerk/ /
7
Kent City Council Meeting
Date October 15 , 1996_
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: 1997 BUDGET - SET HEARING DATE
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Set November 5, 1996, as the public
hearing date for the 1997 Budget. Preliminary Budgets will be
available in the City Clerk' s office after October 15 .
3 . EXHIBITS: None
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Finance Director
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 3C
Kent City Council Meeting
Date October 15 , 1996
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: CANTERBURY GREENS PRELIMINARY PLAT SU-96-4 - SET
MEETING DATE
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Set November 5, 1996, as the date for a
public meeting to consider the Canterbury Greens Preliminary
Plat (SU-96-4) .
3 . EXHIBITS: None
4 . RECOMMENDED BY:
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES
6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 3D
Kent City Council Meeting
Date October 15, 1996. _
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN - CONCURRENCE
WITH EXISTING PLAN
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Concurrence with the threshold criteria
utilized in the Neighborhood Traffic Control Program. The City
has an established Neighborhood Traffic Control Program which
is an outreach to neighborhoods for resolving their traffic
related concerns. Community meetings are conducted and
educational materials are distributed, copies of which are
included in the packets. This was presented to the Public
Works Committee to assure awareness of the Program and solicit
support of the criteria therein. The Public Works Committee
recommended that Council concur with the threshold criteria
utilized in the Program.
3 . EXHIBITS: Public Works Committee minutes, Public Works
Director memorandum, and Neighborhood Traffic Control Program
brochures
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 3E
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
October 2, 1996
TO: Public Worlcs Commit ee
FROM: Don Wicicstrom
RE: Neighborhood Traffic Control
As of late the requests by neighborhoods for traffic control has been numerous if not
overwhelming. After performing the necessary analysis, many of the situations do not
warrant any action as they don't fall within the established threshold criteria for
same. Since neighborhood traffic control is such a sensitive issue, we thought it
appropriate to refresh Council's knowledge on the program and the associated criteria
threshold. Ed White will make a presentation .
It is our intention to seek Council affirmation of the existing criteria or some
modified version thereof.
ACTION: Recommend Council concur with the threshold (modified threshold)
criteria established for the Neighborhood Traffic Control Program.
PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE
October 2, 1996
PRESENT: Tim Clark Ed White
Connie Epperly Larry Webb
Don Wickstrom
ABSENT: Judy Woods
Neighborhood Traffic Control Program
Wickstrom said that numerous inquiries have been received regarding the City's traffic control
plan. We do have a program with an established criteria which we want to make sure that Council
is aware of, however the criteria may need adjusting. Wickstrom stated that we do need criteria
as we don't want speed humps on streets with high volumes of traffic. He noted that speed humps
would adversely affect emergency service vehicles.
Ed White explained that the Neighborhood Traffic Control Plan is the City's outreach to the
neighborhoods regarding traffic related concerns. He said that we provide information to the
communities on traffic flows and characteristics of the roadways. Ed noted that most of the time
the concerns are related to traffic volume, mainly traffic cutting thru neighborhoods to avoid a
higher congested area and also, child safety. Ed explained that in determining the criteria, we
use a figure of 1,000 vehicles per day in a residential area. The other criteria used is vehicle
speed - the established speed limit plus lOmph over. Anything greater than that would indicate
some corrective measures need to be taken. He noted that the lOmph over accounts for the
general characteristics of the roadway as well as vehicle speedometer flaws. He said after
providing information to the neighborhoods thru our meetings, we get them involved by training
on the use of radar guns. Ed stated that when necessary, physical improvements are required such
as speed humps, chokers, traffic islands or sometimes complete road closures.
Larry Webb addressed the issue of road restrictions as related to public safety vehicles. He said
the public safety services would include ambulance companies, medic units, fire engines, etc.
Webb noted that speed humps cause excessive damage to fire engines. Regarding traffic islands,
Webb stated that most fire engines would have to travel in the oncoming lane to go around an
island and a choker would slow down emergency service. In response to Clark, Webb stated that
in most instances an emergency can be responded to within 5 minutes.
Wickstrom stated that we can't address everything and it's difficult to please everyone. He said
we could install speed humps to slow down a few speeders but where is the criteria when we don't
want speed humps? With definitive criteria, we can then define what we can do and move on.
-- We should look at what we can address with a certain criteria also in keeping with the needs of
emergency vehicles.
l
In response to Clark regarding sidewalk installations, Wickstrom said that annually the cost for
sidewalks is at least $300,000 and we are still trying to rehab existing damaged sidewalks. We
have been able to address additional sidewalk or walkway problems, for example Park Orchard
Elementary and Sequoia Jr. High, Totem Jr. High, and Star Lake Elementary and also 100th
Avenue S.E.. Wickstrom also noted that we have been unsuccessful in securing grants from the
State for sidewalk projects.
Committee unanimously recommended that Council concur with the threshold criteria established
for the Neighborhood Traffic Control Program.
In response to Mrs. Rust regarding the traffic island concept, Ed stated that we have looked into
this. However at this time, the neighborhoods feel that speed humps will solve their problems.
He further stated that the most expensive traffic control device are traffic circles which have a
high maintenance cost.
Meeker Street Sidewalks - Acceptance
Wickstrom explained that this is before the Committee because it is 10.5% over the contract
amount. He said the overage is due to excessive excavating after some old gas tanks were found
buried underground. This also entailed more money for cleanup.
Committee unanimously recommended that the Meeker Street Sidewalk project be accepted as
complete.
Meeting adjourned: 4:00 p.m.
2
October 1, 1996
HEALTH & (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3K)
SANITATION Little Bend. AUTHORIZATION to accept the bill of
sale for the plat of Little Bend submitted by
Lakeridge Development, Inc. for continuous opera-
tion and maintenance of 1, 616 feet of water main,
1, 546 feet of sanitary sewer, 1, 195 feet of storm
sewers, 1, 646 feet of street improvements, and
release of bonds after expiration period, as
recommended by the Public Works Director. This
project is located at 118th Avenue S .E. and S . E.
268th Street.
SEWER (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3R)
Beck Short Plat Sewer Extension. AUTHORIZATION
to accept the bill of sale for Beck Short Plat
Sewer Extension submitted by Kenneth and Lois
Beck for continuous operation and maintenance of
165 . 4 feet of sanitary sewer improvements, and
release of bonds after expiration period, as
recommended by the Public Works Director. This
project is located at 22840 96th Avenue South.
TRAFFIC (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3L)
CONTROL S.E. 208th Agreement with Ring County.
AUTHORIZATION for the Mayor to sign the S.E.
208th Street Improvement Agreement with King
County, as recommended by the Public Works
Committee. The Agreement requires the City to
reimburse the County on an amortized basis upon
annexing the area, the cost for improving S . E.
208th Street from 116th Avenue S . E. to 132nd
Avenue S. E. to five lanes plus sidewalks etc. In
conjunction therewith, the County is required, at
their expense, to widen with amenities, S. E.
240th Street from 132nd Avenue S . E. to 139th
Avenue S. E. (Meridian County Club entrance) ,
construct a new fish passable Soos Creek crossing
of- S. E. 256th Street westerly of 148th Avenue
S. E. , pay half of the cost of replacing the S. E.
256th Street flume with a fish passible facility
and repair the 3rd Avenue Green River bridge.
STREET (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3F)
VACATIONS Street Vacation - Saar/Railroad Ave. ADOPTION of
Resolution No. 1483 setting November 5, 1996, as
the hearing date for the Saar/Railroad Avenue
Street Vacation, as recommended by the Public
Works Committee.
The Public Works Department has received a re-
quest from Mary A. Hofling to vacate a portion of
Saar Street at Railroad Avenue.
2
October 1, 1996
STREET (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3Q)
VACATIONS Russell Road Street Vacation. ADOPTION of
Ordinance No. 3316 vacating a portion of Russell
Road. Council recently approved this street
vacation subject to the applicant first ful-
filling certain conditions, all of which have
been met. Accordingly, it is now appropriate to
pass this ordinance to vacate this part of
Russell Road.
REZONE (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3C)
Van Doren's Landing Building I Rezone _RZ-96-4 .
ADOPTION of Ordinance No. 3313 rezoning approxi-
mately 11. 93 acres from M1, Industrial Park
District to M1-C, Industrial Park District "C"
suffix.
POLICE (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3M)
Corrections Facility Food Service Contract.
AUTHORIZATION to extend the Food Service Contract
at the Kent Corrections Facility. Consolidated
Food Management, Inc. has been providing food
service at the Kent Corrections Facility since
approximately 1990 . The contract with them will
expire on December 31, 1996, and they have
requested extension of the contract for an
additional year. Staff has been very pleased
with the service provided by Consolidated Food
Management and extension of the contract through
December 1997 is recommended.
(CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3N)
Contract with city of Federal Way for Housing of
Inmates . AUTHORIZATION for the Mayor to sign a
contract with the City of Federal Way for housing
a guaranteed minimum of 20 inmates at the Kent
Corrections Facility. This contract was negoti-
ated in an attempt to replace revenues lost by
the opening of the U. S. Marshals' own facility.
Revenue anticipated through this contract will be
approximately $425 , 000 .
(CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 30)
Boating Safety Program Application.
AUTHORIZATION for the Mayor to sign a Boating
Safety Program application. The Kent Police
Department was invited to submit an application
to obtain boating program approval. This program
allows for approved agencies to be eligible for a
percentage of the monies received for recrea-
tional boat registration fees in their county.
Monies received through this program must be
3
October 1, 1996
POLICE deposited in a dedicated account and can only be
used for boating safety program activities. This
is the application process only and in no way
guarantees approval to be eligible for these
funds. The application, however, does require
signature of the Mayor.
(CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3P)
Bureau of Justice Assistance Block Grant
Application. APPROVAL of the application for
Block Grant Funds from the Bureau of Justice
Assistance, as requested by the Police
Department. A preliminary application was
prepared and submitted electronically to meet
the required grant application deadline. The
request is for equipment and computer software,
the majority of which will focus on training.
The grant requires a 10% matching cash contribu-
tion and the grant itself picks up the remaining
90% . The total amount will be $61, 030 , with a
90% grant portion of $54 , 927 and a lo% city match
of $6, 103 .
The State of Washington Department of Community,
Trade and Economic Development advised they were
in support of the City, s proposal and have ad-
vised the Police Department to submit the request
directly to the Bureau of Justice for approval
and funding.
(OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4B)
Compression Brakes. A citizen who resides near
Military Road on the West Hill asked the City to
consider outlawing the use of compression brakes
within the City limits because of the extremely
high noise levels they generate. After review
and consideration by the Public Works and Public
Safety Committees, the proposed ordinance makes
use of compression brakes unlawful in the City of
Kent.
WOODS MOVED to adopt Ordinance No. 3317 , which
makes the use of compression brakes in the City
of Kent unlawful. Epperly seconded and the
motion carried.
FIRE (OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4A)
Disaster Reimbursement Funds. The Emergency
Management Unit of the Kent Fire Department has
been successful in recovering funds from State
and Federally declared disasters. In order to
4
October 1, 1996
FIRE help departments accurately plan for and reflect
their expenditures, staff requests that the
latest and all future disaster funds be accepted
into a revenue account and then appropriately
distributed to the respective departments, expen-
diture accounts. Any other proposed distribution
of funds would come through the appropriate
Council committee. The Public Safety Committee
would continue to be briefed as to the amount of
funds recovered from disasters.
WOODS MOVED that the Fire Chief be authorized to
have the $5, 209 and all future State and Federal
Disaster Reimbursement Funds first placed in a
revenue account and then appropriately distri-
buted to the respective departments' expenditure
account. Orr seconded and the motion carried.
PLANNING (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3H)
Junk Vehicles. ADOPTION of Ordinance No. 3315
amending Chapter 8 . 08 of the Kent City Code
relating to junk vehicles, as recommended by the
Planning Committee.
(CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3J)
Amendment to Countywide Planning Policies.
ADOPTION of Resolution No. 1484 ratifying the
Countywide Planning Policies as recommended by
the Planning Committee, and as adopted by King
County in Ordinance No. 12421.
COUNCIL (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3E)
Council Absence. APPROVAL of an excused absence
from the October 1, 1996 , City Council meeting
for Council President Houser, as she is unable to
attend.
(CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3S)
(ADDED BY COUNCILMEMBER ORR)
Council Absence. APPROVAL of an excused absence
for Councilmember Bennett, who is unable to
attend tonight's meeting.
BUDGET (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3D)
1997 Preliminary Budget. AUTHORIZATION to set
October 15, 1996, at 5 : 30 p.m. as the date
and time for a Council Workshop on the 1997
Preliminary Budget.
5
October 1, 1996
FINANCE (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3B)
Approval of Bills. APPROVAL of payment of the
bills received through September 16 and paid on
September 16, 1996 . The Operations Committee
meeting scheduled for September 18 , 1996, was
cancelled. Vouchers signed and approved at the
Council meeting of September 17 , 1996.
Approval of checks issued for vouchers:
Date Check Numbers Amount
9/16/96 173775-174395 $2 , 137 , 763 . 42
Approval of checks issued for payroll for
September 1 through September 15 , and paid on
September 20, 1996 .
Date Check Numbers Amount
9/20/96 Checks 214462-214765 $ 260, 297 . 37
9/20/96 Advices 38211-38659 $ 594 , 388 . 88
$ 854 , 686 . 25
(CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3G)
Utility Tax/Sunset Concurrency. ADOPTION of
Ordinance No. 3314 . The utility tax presently
sunsets in April of 2002 and the Six Year Plan
goes to the end of 2002 . It has been recommended
by the Public Works Committee to adopt an ordi-
nance extending the Sunset Clause until December
2006, which will allow time to address all the
issues and still remain in concurrency.
(CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3I)
Regional Justice Center Mitigation Agreement
Funds. AUTHORIZATION to establish a budget
for $200, 000 received from King County related
to the Regional Justice Center Human Services
Mitigation agreement, and approval to expend the
funds.
REPORTS Operations Committee. Johnson noted that the
Committee will meet at 4 : 30 p.m. on October 2nd.
Public Works Committee. Clark noted that the
Committee will meet at 3 : 30 p.m. October 2nd.
Planning Committee. Orr noted that the Committee
will meet at 4 : 00 p.m. on October 15th.
6
October 1, 1996
EXECUTIVE At 7 : 12 p.m. , McFall reminded Council of an
SESSION executive session of approximately 15 minutes to
discuss negotiations for property acquisition.
FIRE DEPT. The meeting reconvened at 7 : 37 p.m. WOODS MOVED
to accept the tentative agreed upon transfer
of assets from King County Fire Protection
District #37 under the conditions listed in
the October 1st memorandum from Brent McFall,
Director of Operations. Orr seconded and the
motion carried.
ADJOURNMENT There was no further business and the meeting
adjourned at 7 : 38 p.m.
Q.Ge--�e/v
Brenda Jacp er, CMC
City Clerk/
7
Kent City Council Meeting
Date October 15, 1996
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: 1997 BUDGET - SET HEARING DATE
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Set November 5, 1996, as the public
hearing date for the 1997 Budget. Preliminary Budgets will be
available in the City Clerk' s office after October 15 .
3 . EXHIBITS: None
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Finance Director
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCALIPERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS•
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION•
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 3C
Kent City Council Meeting
Date October 15 , 1996
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: CANTERBURY GREENS PRELIMINARY PLAT SU-96-4 - SET
MEETING DATE
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Set November 5, 1996, as the date for a
public meeting to consider the Canterbury Greens Preliminary
Plat (SU-96-4) .
3 . EXHIBITS: None
4 . RECOMMENDED BY:
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES
6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 3D
Kent City Council Meeting
Date October 15, 1996
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN - CONCURRENCE
WITH EXISTING PLAN
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Concurrence with the threshold criteria
utilized in the Neighborhood Traffic Control Program. The City
has an established Neighborhood Traffic Control Program which
is an outreach to neighborhoods for resolving their traffic
related concerns. Community meetings are conducted and
educational materials are distributed, copies of which are
included in the packets. This was presented to the Public
Works Committee to assure awareness of the Program and solicit
support of the criteria therein. The Public Works Committee
recommended that Council concur with the threshold criteria
utilized in the Program.
3 . EXHIBITS: Public Works Committee minutes, Public Works
Director memorandum, and Neighborhood Traffic Control Program
brochures
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 3E
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
October 2, 1996
TO: Public Works Commit ee
FROM: Don Wicicstroin
RE: Neighborhood Traffic Control
As of late the requests by neighborhoods for traffic control has been numerous if not
overwhelming. After performing the necessary analysis, many of the situations do not
warrant any action as they don't fall within the established threshold criteria for
same. Since neighborhood traffic control is such a sensitive issue, we thought it
appropriate to refresh Council's knowledge on the program and the associated criteria
threshold. Ed White «i11 make a presentation .
It is our intention to seek Council affirmation of the existing criteria or some
modified version thereof.
ACTION: Recommend Council concur with the threshold (modified threshold)
criteria established for the Neighborhood Traffic Control Program.
PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE
October 2, 1996
PRESENT: Tim Clark Ed White
Connie Epperly Larry Webb
Don Wickstrom
ABSENT: Judy Woods
Neighborhood Traffic Control Program
Wickstrom said that numerous inquiries have been received regarding the City's traffic control
plan. We do have a program with an established criteria which we want to make sure that Council
is aware of, however the criteria may need adjusting. Wickstrom stated that we do need criteria
as we don't want speed humps on streets with high volumes of traffic. He noted that speed humps
would adversely affect emergency service vehicles.
Ed White explained that the Neighborhood Traffic Control Plan is the City's outreach to the
neighborhoods regarding traffic related concerns. He said that we provide information to the
communities on traffic flows and characteristics of the roadways. Ed noted that most of the time
the concerns are related to traffic volume, mainly traffic cutting thru neighborhoods to avoid a
higher congested area and also, child safety. Ed explained that in determining the criteria, we
use a figure of 1,000 vehicles per day in a residential area. The other criteria used is vehicle
speed - the established speed limit plus lOmph over. Anything greater than that would indicate
some corrective measures need to be taken. He noted that the lOmph over accounts for the
general characteristics of the roadway as well as vehicle speedometer flaws. He said after
providing information to the neighborhoods thru our meetings, we get them involved by training
on the use of radar guns. Ed stated that when necessary, physical improvements are required such
as speed humps, chokers, traffic islands or sometimes complete road closures.
Larry Webb addressed the issue of road restrictions as related to public safety vehicles. He said
the public safety services would include ambulance companies, medic units, fire engines, etc.
Webb noted that speed humps cause excessive damage to fire engines. Regarding traffic islands,
Webb stated that most fire engines would have to travel in the oncoming lane to go around an
island and a choker would slow down emergency service. In response to Clark, Webb stated that
in most instances an emergency can be responded to within 5 minutes.
Wickstrom stated that we can't address everything and it's difficult to please everyone. He said
we could install speed humps to slow down a few speeders but where is the criteria when we don't
want speed humps? With definitive criteria, we can then define what we can do and move on.
We should look at what we can address with a certain criteria also in keeping with the needs of
emergency vehicles.
1
In response to Clark regarding sidewalk installations, Wickstrom said that annually the cost for
sidewalks is at least $300,000 and we are still trying to rehab existing damaged sidewalks. We
have been able to address additional sidewalk or walkway problems, for example Park Orchard
Elementary and Sequoia Jr. High, Totem Jr. High, and Star Lake Elementary and also 100th
Avenue S.E.. Wickstrom also noted that we have been unsuccessful in securing grants from the
State for sidewalk projects.
Committee unanimously recommended that Council concur with the threshold criteria established
for the Neighborhood Traffic Control Program.
In response to Mrs. Rust regarding the traffic island concept, Ed stated that we have looked into
this. However at this time, the neighborhoods feel that speed humps will solve their problems.
He further stated that the most expensive traffic control device are traffic circles which have a
high maintenance cost.
Meeker Street Sidewalks - Acceptance
Wickstrom explained that this is before the Committee because it is 10.5% over the contract
amount. He said the overage is due to excessive excavating after some old gas tanks were found
buried underground. This also entailed more money for cleanup.
Committee unanimously recommended that the Meeker Street Sidewalk project be accepted as
complete.
Meeting adjourned: 4:00 p.m.
2
L U 77 z)E Efn
J
✓� ,:�, � .��.. .. ����• r., � .._, .. "ARE
W
..T E} {EEE.).3 {EE{k{iE{{s31 1{E{ i L � �`•�.
MIMI
LLJ
L ):
L:• a•. nIrl
..l...,w .
LL _ {
lei
)
l T� ..w...
U N �
F
CO ✓
Are You Driving
Safely?
Do you always drive 25 mph
or less on your neighbor-
hood street? Drivers who Take
exceed the limit have been a
source of concern for both the 25 mph
residents and City officials. Speed limit
Often the biggest offenders
are residents who live in the SPEED Seriously...
neighborhood and are fa- LIMIT especially
miliar with the street.
2 O
where
children are
SPEED WHEN present.
LIMIT CHILDREN
ARE PRESENT
125
M.P.H.
Are You Parking It's the law...No person • within 15 feet of a fire
Legally or Illegally? shall stand or park a ve- hydrant
hicle, whether occupied or • within 20 feet of a
Parking on the street has not, except momentarily to crosswalk
been a neighborhood pref- pick up or discharge a pas-
erence. However, do you senger or passengers: It's the law...No person
know major parking laws? shall park any vehicle upon
• in front of a public or any public street, alley or
It's the law...No person private driveway or way or leave such vehicle in
shall stop, stand, or park a within five feet of the the same public place for a
vehicle: edge of the curb radius period exceeding 24 hours.
• on a sidewalk or street leading thereto
planting strip No person shall stop stan
• within an intersection > stand, or
• on a crosswalk (marked park a vehicle...
or unmarked)
Are you aware of In recent years, the Cities
your child's or other have been working with
children's safety? AAA Washington and
Harborview Injury Pre-
Then, this portion of the vention & Research Cen-
NTSC brochure should be ter to help educate citizens
helpful in creating a safer about bicycle and pedes-
environment for the chil- trian safety. Working
dren in your neighborhood. together, significant steps
can be taken to spread
valuable safety informa-
tion.
Because children most
tJ� likely are in the street
environment when they
are bicycling or walking,
we will focus in on bicycle
" J and pedestrian safety.
What is Bicycle
Safety?
"My child only rides Has your child mastered
around the neighbor- basic maneuvers such as
hood, so I don't worry." starting, stopping, sig-
naling, and negotiating
up and down hills and
The majority of bake accidents around curves?
happen near home. Young children should be able
to execute these basic maneu-
You should worry. The ma- vers in a safe area before being
jority of bike accidents hap- allowed on public roads. Chil-
dren younger than eight years
more, a large percentage of of age need close supervision
the fatal bike/vehicle colli- and should not be permitted to
lions happen on two-lane ndetheirbikesm the roadway-
streets with speed limits - even on quiet, neighborhood
streets.under 30 mph. Does this
sound like the street outside *Bicyclists are required to
your front door? It may be. obeythesametrafficlawsas
Often bicyclists forget safety motorist&
when they ride in familiar
surroundings and that is
what leads to trouble.
Bicycling Safety • Avoid riding at night.
Tips • Keep your head up and
ride straight.
• Avoid weaving in and
• Always wear a bicycle out of traffic or trick
helmet. riding on the street.
• Stop at intersections. • Make sure you are seen
• Walk your bike across by motorists.
busy intersections and • Give cars and pedestri
streets. ans the right of way.
• Ride on right side of • Avoid broken pave-
roadway with traffic. ment, litter, loose
• Obey all traffic signs gravel, mud or leaves.
and signals. They can cause you to
• Always STOP at stop lose control of your
signs. bike.
• Always STOP and -
00
check for traffic before
entering a street from a
driveway, parking lot Bicyclists are required to obey the
or sidewalk.
• Use proper hand signal same traffic laws as motorists.
for turning or stopping. -• •-•• ----- -
• Be extra careful turn-
ing left.
What is Critical Ages
Pedestrian
of-
Safety?? Ages 14 Children are of- Ages 5-8 Children are of-
y tenhitbybackingvehicleswhile tenrequiredtowalktoandfrom
playing in driveways. Alterna- school without adult supervi-
tiveplayareasareneeded,along sion. They seldom stop at the
with supervision. edge of the street and look both
Why are children in- ways before crossing. Make
volved in pedestrian Ages 2z Children often sureyourchildknowsthesafest
accidents: walk with a parent. Practice route to school and follows it
safe street crossing together by everyday.Youshouldwalkthe
• They don't believe that talking about how to cross the route with your child so he is
cars can really hurt street; holding hands and familiar with it.
them. "modeling" the behavior, and
• They forget safety rules practicing looking for cars.
when playing. How can you help?
• They are too small to Ages 4-7 Children are in-
be seen by drivers. awYhkelYtoplayoutside Do you "tell' your child to
• They can't judge the without supervision. They of- stay out of the street: Or do
speed or distance of ten run into the street while you demonstrate by your
traffic. playing near it. example, how to be a safe,
hitelligent pedestrian? It's the law...Every driver
Children imitate and model of a vehicle shall exercise
their behavior after others. due care to avoid colliding
Your actions, both as a pe- with any pedestrian upon
destrian and driver, will any roadway and shall give
speak louder than any words warning by sounding the
you could express. What horn when necessary and
children learn from family shall exercise proper pre-
members and others they caution upon observing any
admire could save theirlives child upon a roadway.
or result in tragedy.
Driver Safety Zips
• Teach your child how to • When making a left or
stop at the edge of the right turn, check your blind
street, look left-right-left spots.
and cross only when no cars • When backing out ofyour
are coming. Show them driveway,watch for children
where they should and and pedestrians.
should not walk. • Watch for children along
side the road and be pre-
Don't expect your young pared to stop.
child (under 7 or 8) to cross
residential streets without
help. Even older children
still need help crossing busy PEDESTRIANS
streets. It's the law...No pedes-
• Find places for chil- trian shall suddenly leave a
dren to play away from curb or other place of safety
driveways and streets. and walk,run,or otherwise
move into the path of a ve-
hicle which is so close that it
Do you know vital is impossible for the driver
pedestrian safety to stop.
laws?
It's the law...Every pedes-
DRIVERS trian crossing a roadway at
It's the law...If you are at a any point,other than within
marked or unmarked cross- a marked or unmarked
walk,you must STOP when crosswalk atan intersection,
a pedestrian is in your half shall yield the right of way
of the road or moving to- to all vehicles upon the
ward your half. roadway.
Every driver of a vehicle shall exercise
due care to avoid colliding with any pedestrian...
It's the law...When side- • Cross at intersections or
walks are provided it shall crosswalks.
be unlawful for any pedes- • Look left, then right,
trian to walk along and upon then left again.
an adjacent roadway. • Look over your shoulder
Where sidewalks are not for turning vehicles.
provided, any pedestrian • Make eye contact with
walking along and upon a the driver.
roadway shall, when prac- • Keep looking left and
ticable,walk only on the left right until safely across
side of the roadway or its the street.
shoulder facing traffic which. • Keep from crossing be-
may approach from the op- tween parked cars.
posite direction and upon • Be extra alert in bad
meeting an oncoming ve- weather.
hicle shall step clear of the • Be seen at night.
roadway. • Observe and obey traffic
signs and signals.
Pedestrian Safety • Walk facing traffic.
Tips
• Always STOP at the curb More children are lulled or injured outside
or the edge of the road. a school bus every year than UnIde one.
Do You Know School
Bus Stop Safet.
Did you know... • do not understand
vehicle speed
• that more children are • are not aware that their
killed or injured outside physical size limits their SCHOOL Bog
a school bus every year ability to be seen
than inside one?
• thatmostofthese deaths It's the law...Wheneveryou
and injuries occur dur- see alternating flashing red
ing daylight hours and lights,you MUST STOP if.
in clear weather?
• that children react dif- 0 you are on a two-lane
ferently than adults to roadway
traffic situations? • you are on a multiple
lane roadway (three or
Children... more lanes) and you're
• act impulsively, can be traveling in the same di-
preoccupied, disregard- rection as the bus.
ing safety, darting out
into traffic
School Bus Safety Tips • Listen to the bus driver.
for Your Child • Remain seated while bus
• Leave home early is in motion.
enough to arrive at the • Keep head and arms in-
bus stop on time. side the bus at all times.
• Walk to the bus stop--- • Remain quiet.
avoid being dropped off • Be courteous to the bus
by parents. driver and other chil-
• Wait for the bus in a safe dren.
place...well off the road- • Watch for traffic when
way. leaving the bus.
• Enter the bus in an or-
derly manner, and take
a seat.
Ultllllat@ly...What * STOP whenever you
come to a stopped school
Can I Do? bus with red flashing
lights. Children may be
Be a careful driver. crossing in front of the
bus.
• Its your responsibility to • Give older adults plenty
stop for pedestrians in of time to get across the
the road. Legally they street.
have the right of way at • When the car in front of
all corners, whether you stops at a corner,
crosswalks are marked stop too. Be prepared for
or unmarked. a pedestrian to cross.
• Take speed limits seri- • Don't ignore pick-up
ously,especially on roads zones, block traffic,
where people walk or interfere with buses, or
cross. Around schools drop children off in the
the speed limit is often middle ofthe roadway or
20 mph when children on the wrong side of the
are present. street. Be careful of this
when the weather is bad
What children learn from family members cayou're driving your
could save their lives or result in tragedy.
• Be aware that children *Most importantly,
playing near streets of- nth this information
our .
ten dart out in front of
cars.
What Services 0 Public WorkwTranspor-
tation Division staff will re-
Does the City place damaged or missing
Provide? signs, fix dangerous pot-
holes,and trim landscaping
• City engineers and plan- that is obscuring driver's
ners can provide future
vision.
plans for your neighbor Police Traffic Officers
hood. They can also work will provide enforcement in
with you to determine your neighborhood on a re-
what can be done to make quest basis.
your street safer and
more livable.
Who Can I Call?
Neighborhood traffic Division
Traffic (target enforcement)
Control Program 859-3315
859-3388
-Neighborhood Speed Street Maintenance --
Watch Program (brush trimming,
pot-holes, signing)
Planning 859-3395
Department
(future plans) I)raffic Engineering
859-3390 (new signing)
859-3388
We know that you wouldn't want any zing tragic to happen
to your familyy or fiiends. Thank you for helping to keep your
neighborhood a safe place to live.
City of Kent Public Works Department
Transportation Divisionfrraffic Engineering
Police Traffic Division
Special thanks for information supplied by City of Bellevue Public Works Department
NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC CONTROL PROGRAM
IT-
SPEED
L I MIT
1 47,
� i I
F
i ! M
1
I
1
11 I�� I III
� � 1
v
MLt OM
' i -T i N -
...aI` -- ,. .�1 I1._. �jj I i
City of Kent SPEED
SPEED
LIMIT Department of Public Works/Transportation LIMIT
"-
5
NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC CONTROL PROGRAM
This brochure is designed to introduce the City of 'Kent Department of Public Works,
Transportation Division, Neighborhood Traffic Control Program (NTCP) . The intent
of the program is to dedicate resources to address neighborhood concerns with
regards to traffic safety issues. These = ssues include reducing vehicle speeds ,
cut-through traffic and accidents on residential streets , thereby creating safer,
more pleasant neighborhoods for Kent' s citizens.
This program enables citizens and/or community groups to participate in the problem
identification, planning, design, implementation and evaluation stages of projects.
This community involvement allows the Transportation Division to learn of
residents ' perceptions of problems, the extent of their concerns and needs, and
their ideas about possible solutions.
HOW THE PROGRAM WORKS
The Peighborhood Traffic Control ?rogram works on a prioritization system.
citizen and/or community group may submit a request `or inclusion on the NTCP by
filling out the attached Citizen Request 'Form. On this form they provide
information on the traffic situation in their neighborhood and what types of
solutions they feel would best solve the problem.
Once a request is received, the Transportation Division conducts a field investiga-
tion of the area and recommends a course of action . It is important to try and
address the problem with the least restrictive measure first, as this causes the
least amount of inconvenience to neighborhood residents. These include sinning,
brash trimming, pavement legends, and/or the Nei -71hborhood Speed Watch/Awareness
Program (as addressed in Program I ) . Should addit4 :,nal measures prove necessary,
the location may be considered under the Progran . _ Program iIi listing.
HOW TO GET STARTED
The ?Neighborhood -raffic Control °rogram is dedi --ated to addressing neighborhood
concerns with regards to traffic safety. The process described in this brochure,
;ill help us to better define problems and address those locations with the most
severe problems first.
If you would like to have your street considered for the `Neighborhood Traffic
Control Program, please review this brochure and complete the attached request form
(pg. 5 ) . This form has been preaddressed and postage-paid for your convenience.
If you have any questions or comments , please cal ' -raffic Engineering at 359-3388 .
PROGRAM I - TRAFFIC OPERATION IMPROVEMENTS
Types of Problems
Visibility/sight distance, right-of-way definition, speeding vehicles, truck
traffic, parking.
Possible Solutions
Brush Trims - the trimming of brush by either the affected homeowners or
City crews to allow better sight-distance.
Signing - the posting of appropriate traffic control signs. These
may include speed limit, parking, dead end, school signs,
etc.
Pavement P'arkings - the painting of legends upon the traveled portion of the
roadway. These may include speed limits, school crossings
and foglines.
Rumble Strips - the installation of 4" raised buttons placed in a design
sequence across the roadway used to vibrate the vehicle,
cieneratinc driver attention to an upcoming situation.
These may be used in conjunction with speed limit signing,
crosswalks, curves .
Neighborhood Speed Watch Program - this program involves training a group of
neighborhood residents in the use of a radar unit. These
residents clock the speeds of the vehicles using their
street, and write down the make, model and license number
of that vehicle. -his in-crmaticn is given hack to
• • Traffic Engineering and letters are sent by this office,
«e to the registered owners .f those vehicles exceeding the
zs speed limit, expressing the neighborhood' s concern and
\, asking for coo-peratior it obeying the speed limit.
Neighborhood Speed Awareness grogram - invclves training individuals in the use
of radar unit to clock speeds of vehicles usinn this
street. Data Study C'nly.
Target Enforcement - enforcerent `:ert °(,lice Department. —
School Walk Route - establishing safe walk routes for elementary/Junior high
school students for their trips both to and from school .
Play include improving sidewalks/trails.
Neighborhood Traffic Safety Campaign - involves the distribution of Brochures
to neighborhood residents detailing Neighborhood Traffic
Safety. It is a passive measure to bring community
awareness to the issue of traffic safety and gives some
important thought or how to encourage it both on e
resident to resident basis and parent to child basis .
2
PROGRAM II - NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Types of Problems
Speeding vehicles, cut-through traffic (traffic which does not have origin or
destination within the neighborhood) , reported accidents.
Possible Solutions
Traffic Circles - raised islands placed in the center of intersection for
right-angle collisions and control of speeds.
Speed Humps - similar to speed bumps used in shopping center parking
lots, but with an important difference. A speed bump is
AN an abrupt pavement feature three to four inches in height
WIN and only one to two feet wide. A speed hump on the other
_ hand, is also approximately three inches in height but
much gentler in configuration with a length of at least
12 ' at its base. It allows vehicles to drive over speed
a humps at 25 mph. The higher the speed, the greater
r discomfort is experienced.
Chocker/Curb Extension - is a narrowing of a street either at an intersection
or midblock, in order to reduce the width of the traveled
roadway. In many cases , they are semi-diverters used in
conjunction with "Do Not Enter" signs. They are a barrier
--�- to traffic in one direction of a street which permits
traffic in the opposite direction to pass through.
e.eeo v..o eu�.
ew.
Citizens wishing to be included in the Program II need to circulate a petition
through the affected area (determined by Traffic Engineer) showing 65% majority
support for above referenced project. This is only done after the Public Works,
Transportation Division has reviewed the request, applied Program I solutions, and
deems the location feasible for that type of device.
3
Location feasibility is determined by the following conditions:
A physical device can be considered for installation when the benefits
normally derived by residents from a local residential street are
significantly diminished by speed of traffic (even though there have been
few or no accidents) as evidenced by a substantial majority of the abutting
residents signing a petition for the installation of traffic control devices .
Grades less than 5% and no curves.
Cannot be an important access route for emergency vehicles.
No more than two lanes.
Street should not be a truck or transit route.
Not to be installed on cul-de-sac streets less than 800 feet in length.
Once a petition is received, volume counts and speed studies will be conducted
along with analyzing the reported accident history. Location must meet the
following control matrix warrants for installation of physical traffic control
devices.
SPEEDS GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO 35 MPH - 85%
VOLUMES GREATER THAN 300 VEHICLES PER DAY - LESS THAN
3,000 VEHICLES PER DAY
Should more requests be received than funding available, the locations will be
prioritized according to point criteria. Any location with volumes greater than
3,000 vehicles per day, will be considered under Program III .
PROGRAM Ill - NEIGHBORHOOD CORRIDOR PROBLEMS
Types of Problems
Vehicle speeds, cut-through traffic, pedestrian safety
Possible Solutions
ROADWAY PROJECT - Installing sidewalks, curb and gutter, roadway medians.
Citizens requesting this type of a project need to make a written request to the
Capital Improvements Program explaining circumstances and what benefits are derived
from such a project. This type of request must be submitted by local community
club/neighborhood association and supported by neighborhood consensus documented by
petition.
This location will then be prioritized under the Capital Improvement Program
guidelines and criteria.
4
SPEEDI NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC CONTROL PROGRAM
25 ,LIMIT
CITIZEN REQUEST FORM
Contact Name
;
Address
Day Phone
Today' s Date
Problem Location
Description of Problem
After reading the attached brochure, I feel the best type of solutions for my
described problems is
Thank you for taking the time to fill out the citizen request form. Once we
i receive the form, we will be contacting you to let you know our proposed action.
---------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
Date Received Project Number
Field Investigated
Proposed Action
Resident Contacted By
WELCOME TO THE
AND
NEIGHBORHOOD "�", NEIGHBORHOOD
SPEED �; SPEED
AWARENESS ' '� WATCH
sP[ca
llMli
25
PROGRAMS
HOW THE PROGRAMS WORK
As noted under Program I in the information section of this brochure, the Neighborhood Speed
Awareness program is a data study of traffic volume and speeds in your neighborhood, The
Neighborhood Speed Watch Program involves the use of radar to clock and record speed viola-
tions, so the vehicle owner can be made aware of neighborhood speed limits and neighborhood
concern.
HOW TO GET STARTED
The first step you will need to take is to sign and circulate copies of the attached petition to gen-
erate assistance and awareness in your neighborhood,
If a data study is to be undertaken, a neighborhood representative will complete the forms (pgs.
5-8 & 11) enclosed for that purpose. Following completion of this study, the City/Neighborhood
Association will send a Neighborhood Speed Awareness Announcement Form (pg. 9) to residents
in the study area.
If the Neighborhood Speed Watch Program is undertaken, a neighborhood representative will
complete a "Speeding Vehicle Report' (attached). Following completion of this portion of the
program, the City will send a letter to targeted vehicles (pg. 10).
The neighborhood representatives will be trained on the use of radar equipment and a unit
checked out to that person (pg. 11).
It shall be noted that this program will take up to one (1) year to complete. The reason for this
amount of time is to educate the motorists as to their driving habits. After the initial traffic study and
the forms on pg,9 are sent to neighborhoods in question,the study will continue for 11 to 12 months.
The neighborhood reoresentative will do a 3 day study each month for up to 12 months and the
city will send out the letter on pg. 10 advising the drivers about their speed in hopes they will drive
the speed limit through your neighborhood.
We are looking forward to attaining safer Kent neighborhoods, thanks to your Involvement,
CAN WE DO SOMETHING ABOUT
SPEEDING IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD?
SPEED
LIMIT
L 5
Residents in our neighborhood are concerned about speeding problems on our streets.
We have contacted the Department of Public Works and Utilities to initiate:
NEIGHBORHOOD SPEED AWARENESS
MWAM
NEIGHBORHOOD SPEED WATCH PROGRAMS
The Neighborhood Speed Awareness portion of this program is a data study on the
speed and volume of traffic in our neighborhood. The Neighborhood Speed Watch
program involves the recording of speeds on our neighborhood streets and the
notification of registered owners of vehicles observed in excess of the speed limit '
expressing our concern for neighborhood safety. I hope you will cooperate with us
in making this a successful program and safer neighborhood. If you want any
further information, or would like to help, please contact the undersigned or the
Department of Public Works and Utilities at 859-3388.
i
Neighborhood Representative P one
8 '
SPEED WATCH
'h`T
23'
ANNOUNCEMENT
We are working together as a team to encourage and enhance traffic
safety throughout your neighborhood and would like you to play an
active role. Keeping our neighborhoods safe is a positive way of
protecting our children, pets, property and ourselves, Since residential
streets are not designed to handle high-speed traffic, it is important that
people drive cautiously,at or belowthe 25 mph speed limit on residential
streets.
Speed studies conducted within the city indicate the majority of motor-
ists are driving between 10 mph and 15 mph over the legal speed limit.
We would like to make area residents aware of this situation so that all
drivers will exercise more caution in the future while traveling city streets,
Speed limits are established for the safety of all, both those living along
the street and those using the streets. In the interest of neighborhood
safety and tranquility, we share a concern and encourage you, and
hope you will encourage other drivers of your vehicle,to reduce speed
and exercise additional caution as appropriate when traveling on
neighborhood streets,
If you are already observing the 25 mph speed limit,your neighbors and
the City staff appreciate your consideration.
This Neighborhood Speed Announcement has been brought to you by:
Ed Crawford Ed White/
Kent Police Chief Transportation Engineer
9
CITY OF !V,'Lt!2 �
Date
Dear
The City of Kent, Department of Public Works and Utilities, is working with neighborhoods
throughout Kent to encourage and enhance traffic safety. Keeping our neighborhoods safe is
a positive way of protecting our children, pets, property and ourselves. Since residential streets
are not designed to handle high-speed traffic, it is important that people drive cautiously at or
below the 25 mph speed limit on residential streets.
We have been informed that your vehicle, a license number
was measured using City radar equipment by neighborhood residents as traveling in the
of at or about mph. The maximum legal
speed limit under ideal conditions for this location is 25 mph. This is not a notice of violation and
will not be included in any record relating to your vehicle or any driver; however,we would li'
to make you aware of this situation so that drivers of your vehicle will exercise more caution In
the future.
Speed limits are established forthe safety of all,both those living along the street and those using
the street. The Neighborhood Speed Watch Program is operated by residents trained in the use
of radar equipment living in the vicinity where your vehicle was observed. In the interest of
neighborhood safety and tranquility,we share their concern and encourage you,and hope you
will encourage other drivers of your vehicle, to reduce speed and exercise additional caution
when traveling on neighborhood streets.
If you have any questions or comments, please call 859-3388
Sincerely,
Ed White
Assistant Transportation Engineer
_ Own,
220 4th Ave. So.,/ KENT,WASHINGTON 98032-5895/TELEPHONE (206)859-3300
10
._
NEIGHBORHOOD • SPEED WATCH
25
RADAR UNIT LOAN AND USAGE AGREEMENT
I ,
Name
ress
(City) (State) (Zip)
(Business Phonej (Home—PToneF
Understand that:
1 . The radar unit and associated accessories, as listed below, have been loaned to
me by the City of Kent, Department of Public Works and Utilities , as provided
in the Neighborhood Speed Watch Program.
2. The radar unit, which has been loaned to me is a delicate instrument and must
be handled carefully. I will be responsible for protecting it and returning it
in good working order. Users must be 21 years or older.
3 . As operator, I am not a City employee or a law enforcement officer and will not
communicate or seek to communicate by my actions or speech, that I am.
4. I will not attempt to chase, stop or apprehend drivers nor will encourage any
other person to do so. No gestures or verbal comments will be made by me, nor
will I throw objects at vehicles/drivers.
The radar unit will be returned on or before
SIGNED
The above named person received training in the use of the radar unit, data
collection and specifically reviewed with the necessity to refrain from actions
described in paragraphs 3 and 4 above on:
By:
ate
11
SPEED
Ll MIT
City of Kent
_ Department of Public Works/Transportation
220 4th Avenue South
CITYo!xE�'� Kent, WA.
WASHIHGTOH
Kent City Council Meeting
Date October 15 , 1996
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: MEEKER STREET SIDEWALKS - ACCEPTANCE
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works
Committee, accept as complete the contract with Gary Merlino
Construction for the Meeker Street Sidewalks project and
release of retainage after State releases. The original
contract amount was $272, 337 . 00. The final construction cost
was $300, 870. 41. The overage is due to excessive excavating
after old gas tanks were found buried underground. Adequate
funds exist within the project budget to cover this overage.
3 . EXHIBITS: Vicinity map
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
.ACTION•
Council Agenda
Item No. 3F
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
October 2, 1996
TO: Public Works Committee
FROM: Don Wickstrom
RE: Meeker Street Sidev,,alks - Accept as Complete
This project consisted of an on-going repair program to replace damaged side,.valks in
the dowtown area. The contract was awarded to Gary Merlino Construction for the
bid amount of S272,337.00. The final construction cost was S300,870.41 .
This contract exceeded the bid amount due to additional excavation and extra
material required which was unknown at the time the contract was awarded.
Adequate funds exist %vithin the project budget to cover this overage.
ACTION: Recommend the Meeker Street Sidewalk project be accepted as
complete.
In response to Clark regarding sidewalk installations, Wickstrom said that annually the cost for ...
sidewalks is at least $300,000 and we are still trying to rehab existing damaged sidewalks. We
have been able to address additional sidewalk or walkway problems, for example Park Orchard
Elementary and Sequoia Jr. High, Totem Jr. High, and Star Lake Elementary and also 100th
Avenue S.E.. Wickstrom also noted that we have been unsuccessful in securing grants from the
State for sidewalk projects.
Committee unanimously recommended that Council concur with the threshold criteria established
for the Neighborhood Traffic Control Program.
In response to Mrs. Rust regarding the traffic island concept, Ed stated that we have looked into
this. However at this time, the neighborhoods feel that speed humps will solve their problems.
He further stated that the most expensive traffic control device are traffic circles which have a
high maintenance cost.
(� Meeker Strep-L Sidewalk - Acceptance
Wickstrom explained that this is before the Committee because it is 10.5% over the contract
amount. He said the overage is due to excessive excavating after some old gas tanks were found
buried underground. This also entailed more money for cleanup.
Committee unanimously recommended that the Meeker Street Sidewalk project be accepted as
complete.
Meeting adjourned: 4:00 p.m.
SaTH AVE O - _N�_
3 � Ia m
w
2 3 WASHINOTO4 AVE
!.Me
-i AVE
OVOM
3 NADEN AVE N LINCOUI AV
1 SON AVEol
t 3A-wH1tL -1 F
=>
aim PAT�
. u p, N• /.
a -T I, 3 GTH aTN' AVE.
S STH AVE AVE
r E E i S u o
S 57H �',, AVE = S STH AVE A i ;x N STH
w mx rn pcm
u N f AT rZ aD 1n m
ATH -i AVE: 2 N ATM AVE
04 2 1 y
S 3RD O AVE D C
n � i yam_ KIM'\NIA
H N 5 V RK 'f .
S 7 •'� 2ND AVE r N 2ND i
a a a AV
o9♦ uy E €- i
SOTMAVE. 3 1ST AVE -� 'jam S ~13T� +°a A v 13T AVE rf'-" a N
n
S RAILROAD ; AVE D N �1 LROAD AVE a
2 YRIOGES O AVE O w m m S ~
V'.I ^` O� i O a
� N C
S CENTRAL AVE ~ D 4 a �^ AAYE
> om x>2AVM �i �Z•� J1f13Jt 3 3 TE STATE _AVEe Zm o wr
N
r zm w I a p WOOOfOF
d
It +l GAVE
nn
n
-------i O n 2
i� m r 7 _ O
� 4TH AVE.
O c + �, ` i U'i
!
U' r '
y 2ND AVE.
Cn
1ST AVE. --
i 'SHT.' 8 ;'`SHT„g
DOWNTOWN SIDEWALK REHAB PHASE II
Kent City Council Meeting
Date October 15 , 1996
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: BOEING DONATION - ACCEPT AND ESTABLISH BUDGET
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Accept and establish a budget for the
Boeing Rock site for $2 , 500 donated from the Boeing Management
Association, as recommended by the Parks Committee on
October 1, 1996.
On July 10, 1996, Boeing donated three spruce trees and $2 , 500
to celebrate the 50th anniversary of the Boeing Management
Association (BMA) . To further develop the Boeing Rock site,
staff is working with BMA to develop the small site referred to
as the "Boeing Rock, " located west of the Boeing plant,
adjacent to the Green River. The funds provided will enable
the purchase of a picnic table, trash receptacle and small
bedding plants.
3 . EXHIBITS: Confirmation letter dated 6/27/96 and check receipt
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Staff and Parks Committee
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES X
6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $2 , 500
SOURCE OF FUNDS: Boeinq Management Association
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION•
Council Agenda
Item No. 3G
CITY Of
r
��d'� ----------- _-----_----- •1im White, nfuyur
June 27, 1996
Sue Kaas
The Boeing Company
P.O. Box 3707
Mail Stop 6HTC
Seattle, WA SS124-2207
Dear Sue:
Thanks for your patience in waitins4 for the cost estimate for development of the Boeing Rock
Park. I talked with Pete Petersen,Acting Park Maintenance Superintendent and finally
confirmed the necessary filnds to develop the park'
Following is a total cost and break clown of materials:
Picnic Table 1 $703.30
Trash Can 1 $270.50
Topsoil S216.40
Seed $162.30
Equipment Rental $216.40
Installation S500.00
Total $206S.9I1
_ Pete will continue to work on the drawiu_ for your revieN%'. We also talked at one time about
installing a rock garden. I would like to work with you on that project after we get the initial
development phase complete.
Thanks again to you and the Boeing Manweuhent Association for working witlh us to improve
the quality of our park system.
Have a wonderful day and I'll talk to you soon)
Since elv,
t
at)hela McFall. Parks Develop) Tent Coordinator
cc: John 1-10(12SCII, Parks and Recreation Director
"IIAII, kW SOIkFN I' 11',\1111;11;IY)�1•,xi1:?-i�"iI II.I-1-I'llll\I-. i_11,_xi1.11ii1,11=\':av'.•� ''=
I
BOEING EMPLOYEE 5669
BOEING MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION CREDIT UNION
PO BOX 3707 M'S 3W EL GO 90Y 97M5
SEA"LE,WASHINGTON 9B124 'PATTIla WAAA '-A
19-814013250 Date 7/10/1996
PAY TO s -2,500.00
1„E OPOEP .,••
OF Kent Parks Adopt-A-Park Program ,,,,,,,,,, DOLLARS
,,,,,,,,,
Two Thousand Five Hundred and CO/100
C/O Sue Kees
N1/S 6H-TC 2
G ,
Memo Adopt-A-Park
- . . �,.nnnrrit.t:f1 9 6 2 5 501116569
Kent City Council Meeting
Date October 15, 1996
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: MASTER GARDENER GRANT - ACCEPT AND ESTABLISH BUDGET
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Accept and establish the budget for the
$3 , 000 grant from the Master Gardener Foundation of King County
to restore the landscape of the Neely Soames Homestead, as
recommended by the Parks Committee on October 11 1996.
The Parks Department is actively working with community
partners to restore the home and gardens at the historic Neely
Soames Homestead located in the Kent Valley. In July 1996
staff applied for and received a $3 , 000 grant from the Master
Gardener Foundation of King County to restore the landscape
portion of the Neely Soames Homestead.
3 . EXHIBITS: Confirmation letter dated 7/20/96 and check receipt
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Staff and Parks Committee
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES X
6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $3 , 000
SOURCE OF FUNDS: Master Gardener Foundation of King County
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 3H
cooO
0 0
0 0
0
0
000 00
Master Gardener Foundation of King County
July 20, 1996
Pamela Mc ball
220 pith Ave. S.
1<ent, WA 98032
Dear Pamela,
On behalf of the Master Gardeners of King County I am pleased to inform VOL] that the
1996 Master Gardener Board has approved your grant request for $3,000.00 to help
restore the landscape of the Neely Soames Homestead!
The moneys YOU have requested for 1997 will be at the discretion of next year's board, so
1 recommend YOU re-submit your grant request along with a progress report next year.
Please send copies of receipts to me so that I can I:ecp a history of expenditures. Any
photographs of work in progress Would be nice too.
YOLIrs in gardening,
r
Catherine Mix ling County Master Gardena-Treasurer
Master Gardener Foundation of King County
CCliter for Urban I-1ortlCtIllUrC U of W
Box 354115
Seattle, WA 98195
Cenlcr for Urban linrticullurc [1111VCr51iy Df Wasbin lml ♦ Rur.354I15 Scaltic.WA 98195 0 206 205-8616
MASTER GARDNER FOUNDATION OF KING COUNTY 2032
CENTER FOR URBAN HORTICULTURE 19101613250
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON
BOX 364115 2D6-205-86165-8616 9
SEATTL ,WA 98195- /�/)///���/�y7
OAOEA OF
/J /J , Cam"-��y= ''Y i!/`�-�!�
�LV C_iP DOLLARS
WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK 4
1 n J ..... . ,YNNS•,, DM 1
Fon
• l l r rl n'r1 r r,-rl fn n m -,n r 1
:ITY OFLSV
. 1
- Jim White, Mayor
July 1, 1996
George Morrison
Master Gardener Foundation
13419 NE 37th Place
Bellevue, WA 98005
Dear Mr. Morrison:
The City of Kent coupled with many community partners are actively working on restoring the
gardens at the historic Neely Soames Home located in the Kent valley. In an effort to continue
our progress in the restoration of the gardens, we are seeking funds from the Master Gardeners
Foundation. The scope of the project in its entirety includes the restoration of the gardens, home
and furnishings/displays. Total cost for the project is S239,000 and a grant has been submitted to
the Capital Projects Fund for Washington Heritaae to support the efforts of the home restoration
portion of the project.
To support the garden development portion of the project, the grant application specifies the
costs related only to the landscape restoration. Our request for funding is S4,875, representing
21% of the landscape restoration and 2% of the total project development costs.
The earth laughs in flowers" - Emerson
Please join us in celebrating our earth's greatest treasure... our gardens.
Thank you for your consideration of supporting this worthwhile project. If there are any
questions related to this project, please call me at 859-400 2.
,,Sinee ely,
I `
i
ela McFall, Parks Development Coordinator
cc: Catherine Mix, financial manager of the Master Gardeners Foundation
Mike Rawlings, Master Gardener
John Hodgson, Parks and Recreation Director 5
2 0 4th AVE.SO- /KEST.W ASHINGTON 99031.5X95/TELEPHONE i'OhiX59-3300/F:�X n X59-333+
Master Gardener Foundation Board
Center For Urban Horticulture, Merrill Hall,University of Washington
Request No.:
Date:
Project Name: Neely Soames Homestead
Historic Preservation Project
REQUEST FOR FUNDING
(please fill in the following information)
Group Requesting Funding: City of Kent, Parks & Recreation Department
Contact Person: Pamela McFall
Address: 220 4th Avenue South
City/State/Zip: Kent, Washington 98032
944
Phone Day: (206) 859-4002 Evening : (206) 941-.3
Project Name: Neely Soames Homestead Historic Preservation Project
Location: 23691 Russell Road Kent, Washington 98032
Duration: Start Date: June, 1994 Completion Date: June, 1998
Description: The Proposed Neely Soames Homestead Historic Preservation
Project provides for the restoration and preservation of an historical landmark significant
to the City of Kent as a vivid reminder of the pioneer way of life which existed at the
time of settlement of the White River Valley (now known as the Green River Valley) in
the mid-1800's.
The work plan consists of a three phase project: Phase 1--Landscape Restoration; Phase
2--House Restoration, and Phase 3--Furnishing and exhibition space. The project is
seeking assistance with Phase 1--Landscape Restoration.
Funding Request:
(Please attach Proposed budget or itemized list of expenses)
Total Cost of Project: $23,513.00 Percent Funded by Others: 79%
(Please identify sources)
Lump Sum Requested: $4,975.00 Installments: Y N
Date(s) needed: 7/96 - 5/97 Amounts: $3,000-1996/$1,875-1977
Has the Foundation funded other projects for your group? If so, when? grants\garden
No. P
6
Request No: Date:
Project Name:
Please answer the following questions about the project. You may supplement your
response or provide additional information about the project by attaching additional
pages.
1. How will your project relate and contribute to the community? What part of
King County will it serve?
The Kent Parks and Recreation Department's mission is to provide the opportunity and
encourage local citizenry to participate in life enrichment activities through park and
facility development, professional programming, and the optimum utilization of
community resources, one of the most valuable resources being the legacy of our past.
The need to acquire and preserve historic resources has been expressed in hundreds of
public meetings including public forums, surveys and questionnaires, visioning process
and meetings of the City Council, Planning Commission, and Parks committee. These
meetings resulted in the adoption of numerous plans supporting historic preservation, and
in many cases, they call specifically for the acquisition and preservation of the Neely
Soames Homestead.
The proposed Neely Soames Homestead Historic Preservation project provides for the
restoration and preservation of a historical landmark significant to the City of Kent as a
vivid reminder of the pioneer way of life which existed at the time of settlement of the
White River Valley (now known as the Green River Valley) in the mid-1800's.
The work consists of a three phase project: Phase 1--Landscape Restoration; Phase 2--
House Restoration; and Phase --Furnishing and exhibition space. The project is seeking
assistance with Phase 1--Landscape Restoration.
The Neely Soames Project will serve the South King County community.
2. How will it support or involve the young, elderly and disabled?
For the young, the restored gardens provide an historical glimpse into the past.
Coordination between the City of Kent, Kent Historical Society and the Kent School
District will result in an organized effort for a strong educational component. Field Trip
opportunities, space for exhibits and informative displays, and a beautiful visual aid into
our colorful past will benefit children and all who attend.
For the elderly, the gardens offer programmatic opportunities: Site for garden club
lectures, opportunities for community service, and preservation of past held precious.
For the disabled, the gardens conform to the American with Disabilities Act and are
accessible.
And, for the entire community, an enhancement of the quality of life.
3. How will it provide education, training, and information on horticulture to
Washington state citizens?
The gardens will be utilized by the Kent School District, the Kent Historical Society,
several local garden clubs, and perhaps the Master Gardeners Association as a teaching
resource center.
4. How will your project be staffed and maintained? By whom? For how long?
The garden will be the ultimate fiscal and administrative responsibility of the City of
Kent and will enjoy all maintenance and operation privileges of a well maintained
municipality. However, from its very conception, the garden has been very much an
active partnership between community entities and the city. Therefore, we look forward
to lasting technical expertise with local garden clubs in regards to maintenance.
5. Are any Master Gardeners involved in the project: If so, please list their names.
Yes, Mike Rawlings and Caroline Wageman. Additional support from the Master
Gardeners of South King county include: City Hall Open House held in fall of 1995
(informational booth),National Make a Difference Day, fall of 1995 (bulb planting and
training to youth of community), Diagnostic Faire, spring of 1996 (located at Kent
Commons).
6. Is there additional outside funding for the project? Please identify each source,
the amount being funded and whether for short or long term.
Funding for the Neely Soames Homestead Historic Preservation Project is funded by a
culmination of public, private, corporate and service entities.
8
Following is a list of supporters:
Landscape-Phase 1
Amount Funded Cash In kind Duration
Su��orter
620 X Complete
Weisman Design Group
Garden rendering/design X Complete
Sea-Port Dozing & Development 900
Grade/Fill
Puget Sound Foundations SVS., Inc. 3,246 X Complete
Sidewalk/Gravel
West Coast Fence Co.
2.221 X Complete
Picket fence
R.K. Enterprises 965 X Complete
Fence painting
City of Kent 4,500 `�
Irrigation installation
Maple Trails/Des Moines Garden Club 50
Garden Research 73 hrs/S10 hr 730 X Ongoing
Uresco Construction Material, Inc. 90 X Complete
(trellis/arbor materials) x Ongoing
Polygon Northwest 1,000 -
14,322
Additional support for project includes: Eagle Scouts to construct the
arbors/trellis benches, support from the garden club members to install the plant materials
and care for the gardens on an ongoing basis, Snoqualmie Valley Historical Society
(HOPS), constant and consistent support from the City of Kent Park Maintenance crew
for the general upkeep of the facility; as well as support generated from the South King
County Master Gardeners.
7. Will your project be monitored? By whom and for how lone? Please provide the
name and phone number of each contact person providing monitoring.
The Neely Project will be monitored by the following individuals/associations:
City of Kent Personnel
Pamela McFall, Parks Development Coordinator--ongoing monitoring (206) 859-4002
Helen Wickstrom, Superintendent of Parks and Development--development monitoring
(206) 859-3992
Jack Ball, Special Projects Manager--ongoing monitoring (206) 859-3345
9
Consultants
Kathy Mendelson, Historic Garden Consultant--Landscape Phase (206) 827-9019
Kathy /Hoyelson, H Architecture & Urban Design--House Restoration Phase (206)
Tonki624-7880
Community Partners
Mike Rawlins, Master Gardener--ongoing garden monitoring (206) 631-6432
Dorice Wolfrom, Des Moines Garden Club--ongoing garden monitoring (206) 941-1802
Esther Banholzer, Maple Trails Garden Club--ongoing garden monitoring (206) 228-6330
Jack Becvar, Kent Historical Society--ongoing house restoration monitoring (206) 813-
3279
8. What is your project's goal? How will you measure its success?
The project goals are to:
*Identify as a priority the establishment, restoration and maintenance of the Neely
Soames Homestead and Historical Gardens.
*Create a space where heritage and cultural education can take place.
*Form partnerships with public, private, corporate, and service entities creating an
atmosphere of community ownership in our past.
The success of this project is evident today through the numerous partnerships cultivated
and growing to see this project through. Equally important, steps are being taken to
establish a vast array of educational opportunities on site and an opportunity for our
community to participate fully in the development and ongoing care of the homestead.
Ultimately, community feedback will be our measure of success.
p:arants"garden"
10
Neely Soames Heritage Garden
Itemized List of Expenses
Phase I - Landscape Development
ITEM' ;c QUANT/ COST/ SUBTOTAL SECURED NON
UNIT, UNIT. SECUREDr'
Garden Rendering/Design 620.00 620.00 620.00
Grade/Fill 900.00 900.00 900.00
Sidewalk/Gravel 3,246.00 3,246.00 3,246.00
Picket Fence 2,221.00 2,221.00 2,221.00
Fence Painting 965.00 965.00 965.00
Irrigation 4,500.00 4,500.00 4,500.00
Trellis/Arbor Lumber 90.00 90.00 90.00
Garden Research 730.00 730.00 730.00
Hydro Seeding 52,000 sf 3,200.00 3,200.00
Compost to Amend Soil in 20 cy 400.00 400.00
Beds
Mixed Borders & Flower 1 ,950 sf 2.50 sf 4,875.00 "4,875.00
Beds Heritage Species
Bark Mulch 15 cy 20. cy 300.00 300.00
Seeding: Wildflowers, 3,450 sf .20 sf 690.00 690.00
Partial Grass with
Naturalizing Bulbs
Requested items + 8.2 Tax 776.00 776.00
Total 9,465.00
Grand Total 23,513.00 13,272.00 1 10,241.00
*Request for funding = $4,875.00 p:grant\gardeners
Kent City Council Meeting
Date October 15, 1996
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: FIREARMS AND WEAPONS IN PARKS - ORDINANCE
x�/
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Adoption of Ordinance No. amending
Section 4 . 01. 040 of the Kent City Code relating to weapons in
the City parks, as recommended by the Parks Committee on
October 1, 1996 .
Recent state legislation prohibits municipalities from
regulating the possession of firearms, however, municipalities
may still regulate the discharge of firearms. The Kent City
Code currently prohibits the carrying of firearms in City
parks. The proposed ordinance amends the Kent City Code
relating to the possession of firearms in parks, in order to be
in compliance with state law.
3 . EXHIBITS: Ordinance
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Staff and Parks Committee
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION•
Council Agenda
Item No. 3I
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of
Kent, Washington, amending section 4.01.040 of the Kent City
Code relating to weapons in the City parks.
WHEREAS, the Kent City Code makes it a crime for any, person to carry a
firearm in City parks; and
WHEREAS, state law prohibits cities from regulating the possession of
firearms; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to amend the City code to be consistent
with state law; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES
HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Section 4.01.040 of the Kent City Code is hereby amended as
follows:
Sec. 4.01.040. Same--Discharging weapons, fireworks.
No person shall shoot, fire or explode any fireworks, firecrackers, torpedo or
explosive of any kind or carry any weapon, excluding firearma or shoot, discharge or fire
any firearm, air gun, bow and arrow, BB guns or use any slingshot or any other weapon on
any park properties except a law enforcement officer in the line of duty.
WEAPONS IN PARKS
SECTION 2. If any one or more sections, sub-sections, or sentences of this
Ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance and the same shall remain in full force
and effect.
SECTION 3. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days
from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law.
JIM WHITE, MAYOR
ATTEST:
BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ROGER A. LUBOVICH, CITY ATTORNEY
PASSED day of 1996.
APPROVED day of 1996.
PUBLISHED day of 1996.
2
I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No. , passed
by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the
City of Kent as hereon indicated.
(S EA L)
BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK
FIREARMB.ORD
3
Kent City Council Meeting
Date October 15 , 1996
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: SURPLUS HOUSE DEMOLITION - ACCEPT AS COMPLETE
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Accept as complete the demolition of
surplus houses located at 120 Kennebeck, 26423 Russell Road,
10134 SE 264th Street, and release retainage to contractor
Shear Transport Inc. upon receipt of state releases, as
requested by Parks Administration.
3 . EXHIBITS• None
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Staff
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION•
Council Agenda
Item No. 3J
Kent City Council Meeting
Date October 15. 1996
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: COUNCIL ABSENCE
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Approval of an excused absence from the
October 15, 1996, City Council meeting for Councilmember Clark,
as he is unable to attend.
3 . EXHIBITS: Memorandum
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Tim Clark
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION•
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 3K
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR JIM WHITE
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: TIM CLARK, COUNCILMEMBER
DATE: OCTOBER 9, 1996
SUBJECT: CITY COUNCIL EXCUSED ABSENCE
I would like to request an excused absence from the October 15, 1996 City Council meeting. I will
be unable to attend.
Thank you for your consideration.
TC:jb
Kent City Council Meeting
Date October 15 , 1996
Category Other Business
1. SUBJECT: UTILITY TAX/SUNSET EXTENSION - ORDINANCE
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: The Public Works Committee has recom-
mended amending Chapter 3 . 18 of the Kent City Code to extend
the Sunset provision of the one (1. 0) percent interim tax for
street improvement programs to December 31, 2006 . Ordinance
No. 3314 as adopted was incorrectly presented to Council during
its October 11 1996, meeting to implement the Public Works
Committee recommendation. Therefore, staff recommends that
Ordinance No. 3314 be repealed and the proposed ordinance be
adopted to implement the Committee' s recommendation.
3 . EXHIBITS: Ordinance
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTI,ON:
Councilmember W O-V moves, Councilmember . �seconds
to adopt Ordinance No. ,33A repealing Ordinance No. 3314 and
amending Chapter 3 . 18 relating to extension of the Sunset pro-
vision for the interim tax dedicated for street improvement
programs.
DISCUSSION•
ACTION•
Council Agenda
Item No. 4A
it
i
I
1
11
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of
Kent, Washington, repealing Ordinance No. 3314 and further
amending Chapter 3.18 of the Kent City Code relating to
utility taxes to extend the sunset provisions of the interim tax
assessed for street improvements to provide for long term
planning and continued funding of street improvement
programs.
WHEREAS, the City's utility tax assesses an interim tax of one (1.0) percent
which revenue is dedicated for street improvement programs; and
WHEREAS, the interim tax sunsets April 7, 2002; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the city's street improvement
programs are beneficial to the citizens of the community and due to the need for long term
planning, the City Council would like to continue the tax for such programs by extending
the date the interim tax sunsets; and
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 3314 was incorrectly presented for adoption
during the October 1, 1996, Council meeting to amend Chapter 3.18 of the Kent City
Code as recommended by the City Council's Public Works Committee to extend the
interim tax dedicated for street improvement programs; NOW, THEREFORE,
j',
j1
ill
!I
I�
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES
HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
' SECTION 1, Kent City Council Ordinance No. 3314 is hereby repealed in
its entirety.
SECTION 2. Section 3.18.020 of the Kent City Code is hereby amended to
read as follows:
Sec. 3.18.020. Certain utilities subject to tax.
A. In addition to the other business and license fees required by the ordinances of
the city, there is hereby levied upon all persons (including the city) engaged in certain
business activities a utilities tax to be collected as follows:
1 . Upon every person engaging in or carrying on any telephone business _.
within the city, an annual tax equal to three and one-half (3 1/2) percent of
the total gross operating revenues, including revenues from intrastate toll,
derived from the operation of such business within the city. In addition,
there shall also be assessed an interim tax of three-tenths (0.3) percent
effective until 11:59 p.m. on December 31, 1996 which revenue from said
interim tax shall be dedicated to youth teen programs, plus an interim tax of
one (1 .0) percent effective until 1 1 :59 p.m. on
legislationeffeefiv'e date of any me'vv
Leg
islattire
b b D,, mber 31 . 2006, which
i
revenue from said interim tax shall be dedicated to street improvement
programs. Gross operating revenues for this purpose shall not include
charges which are passed on to the subscribers by a telephone company
pursuant to tariffs required by regulatory order to compensate for the cost to
the company of the tax imposed by this chapter.
2. Upon every person engaging in or carrying on a business of selling,
furnishing, distributing, or producing gaseous gas for commercial or
domestic use or purposes, a fee or tax equal to three and one-half (3 1/2)
percent of the total gross income from such business in the city during the
2
;i
i
I
,I
I
i;
�l
i
tax year for which the license is required. In addition, there shall also be
I assessed an interim tax of three-tenths (0.3) percent effective until 11:59
p.m. on December 31, 1996 which revenue from said interim tax shall be
dedicated to youth teen programs, plus an interim tax of one (1 .0) percent
effective until 11 :59 p.m. on
H jeh ,. er -rya tDec ember 31 , 2006, which revenue from said interim
tax shall be dedicated to street improvement programs.
3. Upon every person engaged in or carrying on the business of selling,
furnishing, or distributing electricity for light and power, a fee or tax equal
to three and one-half (3 1/2) percent of the total gross income from such
business in the city during the tax year for which a license is required. In
addition, there shall also be assessed an interim tali of three-tenths (0.3)
percent effective until 11:59 p.m. on December 31, 1996 which revenue
from said interim tax shall be dedicated to youth teen programs, plus an
interim tax of one (1 .0) percent effective until 11 :59 p.m. on , , ,
Or tifitil the effeetive date ef any new legislatiom adopted by the Washingftm
State
b December 31 2006, which
revenue from said interim tax shall be dedicated to street improvement
programs.
4. Upon every person engaging in or carrying on a business providing garbage
service, a tax equal to six and one-half (6 1/2) percent of the total gross
income from such business in the city during the tax year for which the
license is required. In addition, there shall also be assessed an interim tax of
three-tenths (0.3) percent effective until 11:59 p.m. on December 31, 1996
which revenue from said interim tax shall be dedicated to youth teen
programs, plus an interim tax of one (1 .0) percent effective until 11 :59 p.m.
on
J b'
December
13 2006, which revenue from said interim tax shall be dedicated to street
improvement programs.
5. Upon every person (including the city) engaging in or carrying on the
business of selling, furnishing or distributing water, sewer or drainage
3
i
l
ii
I:Ii
ii
services, a tax equal to three and one-half (3 112) percent of the total gross
income from such business in the city during the tax year. In addition, there
shall also be assessed an interim tax of three-tenths (0.3) percent effective
until 11 :59 p.m. on December 31, 1996, which revenue from said interim
tax shall be dedicated to youth teen programs, plus an interim tax of one
(1.0) percent effective until 11 :59 p.m. on , of tintii the
oemerDecember 31 2006, which
revenue from said interim tax shall be dedicated to street improvement
programs.
B. In computing the tax provided in subsection A., the taxpayer may deduct from
gross income, the following items:
1. The actual amount of credit losses and uncollectibles sustained by the
taxpayer.
2. Amounts derived from the transactions in interstate and foreign commerce
which the city is prohibited from taxing under the laws and constitution of
the United States.
SECTION 3. If any one or more sections, sub-sections, or sentences of this
Ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance and the same shall remain in full force
and effect.
SECTION 4. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days
from the time of its final approval and passage as provided by law.
JIM WHITE, MAYOR
4
i
l
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF KENT AND THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
6
In accordance with the Interlocal Cooperation Act (RCW Chapter 39.34), the Cit
of Kent, Washington, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, hereinafter
referred to as " Kent", and the City of Federal Way, a municipal corporation of the StatE
Washington, hereinafter referred to as "Federal Way", hereby enter into this agreement
follows:
WHEREAS, the parties maintain Police Departments for the benefit and safety of the
citizens of their respective jurisdictions.
WHEREAS, Kent maintains a Corrections Facility located at 1230 Central Avenue
South, Kent, Washington which is primarily designed, staffed and used for the housing of
adults charged with a criminal offense, for the punishment and correction of offenders
after conviction of a criminal offense, and for the confinement and/or holding during a
criminal investigation of a civil detention to enforce a court order; and
WHEREAS, the Interlocal Cooperation Act, as amended, and codified in Chapter
39.34 of the Revised Code of Washington, provides for interlocal cooperation between
governmental agencies; and
WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire, and by this agreement, enter into an Interlocal
Cooperative Agreement ("Agreement") wherein Federal Way can utilize Kent's facility;
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the procedures contained herein
performed and to be performed, the parties hereto agree as follows:
I. IAIL AND HEALTH SERVICES
A. Kent shall accept for confinement and/or holding in the Kent Corrections
Facility (hereinafter "Facility") those persons who are prisoners and shall furnish Federal
Way with the Facility, booking, custodial services, and personnel for the confinement of
Federal Way's prisoners at least equal to those provided by Kent for the confinement of its
own prisoners. For purposes of this agreement, "Prisoner" means a person held when a
charge of Federal Way is the principal basis for confining that person (e.g., the person is
confined by reason of an ordinance violation - pre-trial or post-trial). It includes, but is not
limited to, (a) a prisoner arrested by and booked on behalf of a police officer of Federal
Way by reason of an "open charge" or investigation of a felony; or a prisoner detained for
Federal Way after a City of Kent "hold" has been released; (b) it includes an individual
arrested by a police officer of Federal Way and booked and housed in the Facility.
B. Included in its services, Kent shall provide basic medical care, as defined by
Washington State Custodial Care Standards (W.A.C. #289-20) except hospitalization,
prescriptions, surgical and dental care for which Federal Way agrees to assume all cost
Page 1
and responsibility. Kent shall furnish to Federal Way all Facility medical and health care
services required to be provided pursuant to Federal or State law and regulations
promulgated thereto. If a prisoner needs medical care outside of the Facility, Kent agrees
to contact Federal Way before providing for such care. The cost of outside medical care
will be charged to Federal Way.
C. Kent guarantees to Federal Way for the eventual confinement and/or holding
of up to twenty (20) persons booked and held by the Facility as follows: Effective
October a 5 16, 1996, the use of eight (8) beds will be guaranteed until the agreement
Kent has with the United States Marshall expires in approximately January of 1997. At that
time, the number of guaranteed beds allotted to Federal Way will increase to twenty (20).
Additional beds will be subject to available space and facilities as may be determined
solely by Kent. It is acknowledged and agreed that access to additional beds at the Facility
is on a non-exclusive space available basis and further that Kent is contracting with and
retains the right to contract with other cities for similar access to the Facility during the
term of this contract.
II. COMPENSATION
A. Effective October 4-5 116, 1996, Federal Way agrees to pay to Kent the sum
of $58.00 per day for each guaranteed bed regardless of whether they are all utilized.
Prior to October +5 16, 1996, Federal Way will be charged $58.00 per day for each bed
used. Payment of housing costs will be made promptly and to Kent within thirty (30) days
after the monthly statement is received. Federal Way shall also pay Kent an additional
sum of $58.00 per day, or any portion thereof, for any bed occupied over the guaranteed
beds allotted under this agreement. For the purposes of determining this additional sum, a
day shall mean a 24 hour period commencing at midnight. If any of Federal Way's
prisoners, over the guaranteed minimum, are being held for other jurisdictions as well,
then the cost to house them will be shared equally. Federal Way shall not be charged-a
booking fee in addition to the daily fee
B. Each party may examine the other's books and records to verify charges. If
an examination reveals an improper charge, the amount shall be applied on the next
month's and subsequent month's statements until the credit has been exhausted.
Provided, however, that any unused credit which exists at the time of the termination of
this agreement shall be refunded within twenty (20) days of termination.
C. Kent agrees to notify Federal Way of any rate increase for the following year
prior to September first of any year this agreement is in effect.
III. TERM
This agreement shall take effect October 1, 1996 and shall supersede
and terminate any other Facility use agreement or contract existing between Kent and
Federal Way. This agreement shall be in effect through 1997 and then automatically
renew from year to year unless otherwise modified or terminated as provided herein. This
Page 2
ce
either party upon ninety (90) days written eotiKenc
the
agreement may be terminated by may
other party. If Federal Way requires additional time to relocate prisoners, h
extend the termination notice period only for a period of time mutually agreeable to the
parties.
IV. MOD ! ATION
This agreement shall be modified only upon mutual consent of the parties, in
writing, signed by both parties.
VI. INf)FMNIFI ANION
A. Federal Way agrees to indemnify and hold Kent, its elected officials,
commissioners, officers, employees, agents and volunteers harmless from any and all
claims, demands, losses, actions and liabilities (including costs and attorney fees) to or by
any and all persons or entities, including without limitation, their respective agents,
sing, in whole
in
licensees, or representatives,
causediby the negligent r part,
acts,, errorss, or omis pe
rformance
toof Federal Way,
agreement t
its employees or agents.
B. Kent agrees to indemnify and hold Federal Way, its elected officials, officers,
employees, agents, and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, demands, losses,
actions and liabilities (including costs and all attorney fees) to or by any and all persons or
entities, including, without limitation, their respective agents, licensees, or representatives,
arising, in whole or in part, from the performance of this agreement to the extent caused
by the negligent acts, errors or omissions of Kent, its employees or agents.
VII. WAIVER
No waiver of any right under this contract shall be effective nlilure ess ad i st upong
o i
by the authorized representative of the party to be bound thereby.
full performance on any one or several occasions does not constitute consent to or waiver
of any
r noaice of a deficiency en constituteperfoman, nor does pcer a continued
n a quiesce performance
acquiescence thereto
after
Vill. INLLRANCE
A. Federal Way shall obtain and maintain genefF liability insurance with limits
of one million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence, two million dollars ($2,000,000)
aggregate. This insurance shall provide protection against t4te general
liability, law enforcement liability, and error5. and omissions of the Cil)�
of Federal Way. Federal Way shall provide certificates of insurance demonstrating
coverage by of the required insurance. Federal Way shall name the City of Kent as an
additional named insured on its general and law enforcement liability r4ifY UaLLIQ-�fifr
Page 3
as respects to the
n rtlirtnn of th City of Federal Way, and a Copy ofthe additional insured endorsement
shall be attached to the certificate. Kent reserves the right to request a certified copy of the
policy that evidences the above coverage.
B. It is understood that Kent is a member of the Washington Cities Insurance
Authority (WCIA), an insurance pool of municipalities in the State of Washington, and as
such satisfies all insurance requirements under this agreement as long as Kent remains a
member of WCIA or otherwise secures insurance with the same coverage as required by
Federal Way herein.
IX. SEVER_ A_
If any provisions of this agreement shall be held invalid, the remainder of this
agreement shall not be affected thereby if such remainder would then continue to serve
the purposes and objectives of both parties.
X. ENTIRE AGREEMENT
This agreement represents the entire understanding of the parties. It supersedes any
oral representations that are inconsistent with or modify its terms and conditions.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this agreement to be executed on
the day written below.
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY OF KENT
By: By:
MAYOR MAYOR
DATE:
DATE:
APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
DATE: DATE:
CITY ATTORNEY, CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY ATTORNEY, CITY OF KENT
DATE: DATE:
jailint.k
Page 4
RESOLUTION NO. G
l
A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City
of Kent, urging Metropolitan King County to implement
a fully functional and operational judicial facility upon
opening the Regional Justice Center in the City of Kent.
WHEREAS, Metropolitan King County ("King County") is rapidly
approaching completion of its new Regional Justice Center ("RJC") in the City of
Kent, Washington, at a total cost of more than $160 million; and
WHEREAS, from its inception, this regional justice facility was
intended to be a fully functional and operational courthouse, complete with a jail,
criminal court facility, and civil court facility; and
WHEREAS, since approximately January 1, 1996, a significant portion
of all civil and criminal case filings in King County have been designated for
assignment to the Regional Justice Center in Kent and, as of mid-1996, King County
has projected that up to 3,114 filings each month will meet the RJC/Kent case
assignment criteria; and
WHEREAS, King County has indicated it may not fully build out and
furnish all planned courtrooms potentially available within the new RJC facility; and
� 1
WHEREAS, without fully building out these courtrooms, the RJC in
Kent will not be able to accommodate the full civil case load that is now designated
for this site; and
WHEREAS, King County's promise of convenient access to civil courts
for South King County jurors, litigants and witnesses constituted a valuable
determining factor in accepting the RJC and jail site in Kent; and
WHEREAS, it has recently been proposed that King County complete
three of the four remaining courtrooms that still require full build out and furnishing
so that the RJC can have six civil judges regularly in session rather than three at the
time the facility opens; and
WHEREAS, the City of Kent regards the civil component of the RJC
facility to be equally important to the criminal case component and the jail
component; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: The foregoing recitals are incorporated as if fully set
forth herein.
SECTION 2: All available courtrooms in King County's Regional
Justice Center should be fully built out and furnished to accommodate the civil and
criminal case loads now designated for assignment to the RJC in Kent.
2
SECTION 3: King County should take appropriate action to assure
that at ►east six civil judges be assigned to the RJC to accommodate the civil case
load currently assigned to Kent.
SECTION 4: King County has consistently represented to City of Kent
government and the citizens of Kent that the Regional Justice Center would, from its
inception, be a fully functional and operational courthouse. Accordingly, King
County should take all actions necessary to assure that the type and nature of cases
assigned to the RJC in Kent be proportionately balanced between civil and criminal
cases in accordance with the actual filings entered in the King County court system
since January 1, 1996.
Passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Kent,
Washington this day of , 1996.
Concurred in by the Mayor of the City of Kent, this day of
1996
JIM WHITE, MAYOR
ATTEST:
BRENDA JACOB ER, CITY CLERK
3
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ROGER A. LUBOVICH, CITY ATTORNEY
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of Resolution No.
passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, the day
of 1996.
(SEAL)
BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK
RJC.res
4
CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS
A.
R E P O R T S
A. COUNCIL PRESIDENT
B. OPERATIONS COMMITTEE U Y)
C. PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE ��� V r v' ' 3
D. PLANNING COMMITTEE Q " `, AJ
E. PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE
F. PARKS COMMITTEE 17Z
G. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS
OPERATIONS COMMITTEE MINUTES
OCTOBER 2, 1996
COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT: Jon Johnson-Committee Chair, Leona Orr, Tim Clark for Jim
Bennett
COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Connie Epperly
STAFF PRESENT: Tom Brubaker, John Hillman, Anh Hoang, Brent McFall, Kelli O'Donnell
MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC: Paul Morford
UNIDENTIFIED MEMBERS OF AUDIENCE: Two
The meeting was called to order at 4:38 p.m. by Chairperson Johnson.
A�nroval of Vouchers Committeemember Orr moved to approve the vouchers for September 30, 1996.
Acting Committeemember Clark seconded the motion. All claims for the period ending September 30, 1996
in the amount of$4,281,831.51 were approved for payment by a vote of 3-0.
Request for Proposal for Local Improvement District (LID) Bond Underwriting Services - Information Item
Acting Finance Division Director John Hillman stated that this is an information item for the Committee.
He continued that the city's current underwriter, Lehman Brothers, does not wish to handle the LID
business anymore. LID 345 is coming up so an RFP has been developed to select a new underwriter for
the city's smaller bond sales. He noted that there are a number of companies that specialize in smaller bond
sales. In response to Chair Johnson's inquiry of any action required, Hillman explained that this is for the
Committee's information now and that the item will be brought back to the Committee next month with a
recommendation. McFall clarified that the intent is to come back in early November with a
recommendation as to the proposed underwriter, and have Committee recommendation to Council to select
that underwriter to then put together a bond issue.
i',Iavor's Salary Chande Proposal
Committee Chair Johnson stated that this is a proposal that would change the current Mayor's salary which
is $50,000. Johnson read the proposal distributed with the agenda to the Committee. Johnson asked for
comments from the Council Members to be followed by any members of the audience who wished to speak.
At the request of the Committee, Johnson asked for input from the public. Paul Morford, Post Office Box
6345, Kent, WA 98064, stated he is a concerned citizen and reviewed the history of this item stating it
seemed like it was two months before the primary when the previous Mayor, who was outgoing as a part-
time mayor, had selected a committee to recommend to Council on what the salary would be when it went
to full time. Morford stated that committee did their research and recommended to, what he thinks was still
called the Operations Committee, and he thought Ms. Orr and Mr. White were on it with another member.
Morford noted that he was in the audience at the time because he was considering running for Mayor. He
continued that the committee recommended $75,000 to the Council Committee based on the study of other
cities around. Morford stated that as he remembered Mr. White said, "That is way too much money. I
would take that job for a dollar, but in any case it is not worth over $50,000. Morford stated as he recalls,
Mr. White made the motion to set the salary at $50,000 and Ms. Orr seconded the motion.
Morford continued that the issue came up a couple of years ago when Mr. McFall presented a case for
$75,000 and Mr. Morford spoke against it, at that time. He stated that this primarily a credibility and ethics
problem when a man that proposed that salary and made two statements: he would do it for a dollar, and
in any case it shouldn't be more than $50,000. After further comments Mr. Morford urged the Committee
not to do it, and stated that since the box was opened, it should not only for a raise but for a dollar, and to
write an ordinance for$1. He concluded that this job was created with a full time mayor without a full time
administrator. An ordinance did away with the City Administrator but Mr. McFall was brought in as the
Operations Director but functions as the administrator. Morford suggested that a committee be established
OPERATIONS COMMITTEE MINUTES, CONT.
OCtc&-r 2, 1996
for the next election to look at salaries as well as what they do.
After Mr. Morford concluded his comments, Acting Committeemember Clark asked if this was an action
item. Upon Chair Johnson's response that it was, Clark moved to propose that the Mayor's salary be raised
effective January 1, 1997 to $60,000 a year, and, effective January 1, 1998, the Mayor's salary be raised to
$75,000 with no COLA's and deferred compensation included in the $75,000. Johnson seconded the
motion. Committeemember Orr asked if deferred compensation had to be additional. McFall responded
that it could be either way with it currently being offered as a before tax deduction_ Orr stated that she
agreed with Clark that she could not support proposal as distributed with a salary that totals $94,000 plus
a COLA. She further stated that she could and would not support raising the salary during the current
administration. Orr stated that it was a political issue during the campaign and agreed that it was an ethical
issue. Orr proposed a salary increase with the next election to $60,000 with $5,000 a year increases until
it reaches $75,000. Clark reviewed the salaries of cities with similar populations and noted that Mr.
Morford's concern regarding the City Administrator was irrelevant as the City Council sets policy and did
agree with the need for an administrative position during Mayor White's reorganization. Clark continued
that employees have shown a revived moral under Mr. McFall and he has been pleased with his
professionalism and restored confidence of the staff. Clark noted that the Meridian Annexation has had a
great impact on the city. After reviewing other improvements over the past three years, Clark outlined the
future impacts on the city including the RJC, RT.A, hardrail, impact of the port, etc. He noted that all of
these issues take coordination of all departments. He concluded that the salary needed to be at least
$60,000 and that his proposal would only increase the last year of the term. Johnson questioned the current
benefits of the Mayor. McFall replied that the Mayor receives the same benefit package as other employees.
During discussion he noted that the Mayor does have the use of a city vehicle for official use which was less
expensive that paying mileage for use of his personal vehicle.
Mr. Morford asked to comment. He stated that the Mayor's salary is not comparable to Auburn as there
are two salaries in Kent and only one salary for Auburn since they do not have an administrator. Morford
added that he was concerned that one Council Member believes that campaign promises have meaning and
iew the issue and look
Councilmember Clark does not. Morford suggested that an independent group rev
at the rest of administration's costs. Clark responded that he felt that the Council has spent time looking
at this issue and stated that it is a policy issue. Johnson added that it has been debated numerous times and
he was not sure that a task force or committee would come to any other conclusion. Johnson stated that
if you put the personality aside that the pay for the Mayor should be paid for what they do. Each individual
Mayor may be different. Johnson stated that he supported Clark's proposal noting that the Meridian
Annexation had added additional responsibility from 40,000 citizens to 60,000. Orr disagreed stating that
the city knew the annexation was coming and that when you are running for office and say you'll do it for
$1 and then you are not happy with$50,000 she could not support this proposal. Committee Chair Johnson
called for the vote which passed 2-1 with Johnson and Clark voting aye and Orr voting nay. Johnson stated
agenda for the next City Council meeting at which time
that the item will go under Other Business of the
the public may comment further.
Committee Chair Johnson asked if there were any additional items to be added to the agenda. There being
none the meeting was adjourned at 5:12 p.m.
Page 2
CITY OF KENT
PARKS COMMITTEE MEETING
OCTOBER 3, 1996
Council Present: Chair Judy Woods; Connie Epperly, Jon Johnson
Staff Present: John Hodgson; Lori Hogan, Barbara Ekstrom, Helen Wickstrom,
Roger Lubovich, Teri Petrole-Stump
Others Present: Rod Saalfield, P.O. Box 887, Kent, Washington 98035
Chair Judy Woods began the meeting with introductions of the council members and staff.
Accept & Establish a Budget for Boeing Donation: Parks Committee authorized to accept
and establish a budget for the $2,500.00 received from the Boeing Management Association
to commemorate their 50th anniversary. Funds provide a picnic table, trash receptacle and
small bedding plants. Jon Johnson moved to accept; Connie Epperly seconded. The motion
carried 3-0.
Accept & Establish a Budget for Master Gardener Grant: Parks Committee authorized to
he $3,000.00 grant from the Master Gardener Foundation of
accept and establish a budget for t
King County to restore the landscape of the Neely Soames Homestead. Connie Epperly
moved to accept; Jon Johnson seconded. The motion carried 3-0.
Firearms and Weapons in Parks Ordinance: Parks Committee authorized an amendment
to section 4.01.040 of the Kent City Code relating to weapons in city parks in order to be in
compliance with state law. The amendment prohibits the discharge of any firearms in city
parks. Jon Johnson moved to accept; Connie Epperly seconded. The motion carried 3-0.
Youth Program City Utility Tax Ordinance: John Hodgson requested the sunset provision
of the Youth/Teen utility tax ordinance be removed and become part of the yearly budget. He
explained the challenge when scheduling programs and staffing needs when a yearly sunset
date is stipulated.
Discussion clarified the recent amendment to the sunset date for the Public Works Utility Tax
Ordinance was a separate amendment, and not related to the Youth Program City Utility Tax
Ordinance.
Parks Committee authorized to amend Chapter 3.18 of the Kent City Code relating to utility
taxes of the interim tax assessed for youth teen programs to provide for continued funding of
youth teen programs by extending the December 31, 1996 sunset provision to December 31,
2000. Jon Johnson moved to accept'. Connie Epperly seconded. The motion carried 3-0.
Parks Committee Meeting
October 1, 1996
Page Two
Project/Program Reports
Saturday Market staff will present an "end of the season" evaluation at the November Parks
Committee meeting.
On Saturday, October 5, approximately 20 volunteers will be working at West Fenwick Park
to construct and install playground equipment.
The IAC grant application requesting funding for the development of the East Hill site is
listed 8th out of 62. Though acquisition appears to be taking the lead this year, it is still
hopeful funding will be secured for this development project.
No added items.
Meeting recessed for Executive Session.
Meeting adjourned at 5:00 p.m.
City of Kent eS
cityos Youth and Teen Services
Kent
CREATION. Kent Parks and Recreation Department
PROGRAM
K;N ACTIVITIES
APARTMENT BASED
RECREATION - POSITIVE
RECREATION OPPORTUNITIES
(P.R.O. CLUB)
Afterschool recreation programs
% . held at various apartment com-
ss> plexes targeting junior high stu
¢" 'x dents between the ages of 13 and
17.
MOBILE RECREATION
y A traveling recreation mobile unit
is available to take free recreation
programs designed for elemen-
t'
tary-age children, teens and their
PROGRAM families, anywhere within the City.
SKATE PARK The 35' bus was purchased with
OVERVIEW The Skate Park is scheduled to be funding from the Safe Community/
The Youth/Teen program is a completed in October of 1996. Youth Partnership Grant.
collection of afterschool, When finished the park will have a
evening, and weekend recre- 60'x 80' main skate area with jumps, PROJECT LIGHTHOUSE
ational activities for youth and ramps and rails. The park will also The greater Kent community has
have a Skate Bowl. It is located on
teens who do not have access James Street behind the new Re joined resources to offer teens a
to traditional services.The goal gional Justice Center. A large por drop-in program with education,
recreation and counseling ser
is to facilitate youth activities
tion of the funding was received from vices. Kent Lighthouse sites are
which are "youth driven", the Kent Lions Club and the City of
based at Sequoia and Kent Jun-
strengthen self-esteem and
Kent. for Highs.
leadership and empower teens
to.become valued partners in
their communities. .The fund COMPOSTING AND
x GARDENING
ing for these programs is pro- w , h� > a = +tom
The first You
vided through the City of Kent facilitated Pea
,G= Patch gardens were harvested,
utility tax of three-tenths of one " " thanks to a $19,995 grant from
percent. (0.3%). Recreational Urban Resources Partnership
~.
services have been designed �; 'W�
��� (URP). Ten teenagers were ern-
and implemented beginning in F` ,v`, ployed from March-July and were
January through August of -m � -�-re�
'~� � x.y�� ', trained in environmentally-sound
1996. The following is a pro- gardening practices. 62 garden
gram review of services imple- plots were planted and harvested
mented to date. by area residents.
PROGRAM ACTIVITIES CONTRIBUTORS AND
COMMUNITY •YOUTH SUPPORTERS
ADVISORY COUNCIL *Kent School District
Has representation from all Kent jun
-Food Services
for and senior high schools. The -Community Outreach
"youth driven" advisory council is -Sequoia Jr. High
charged with.developing program - Kent Jr. High
ideas, providing leadership, and of-
fers opportunities to earn honors for *Apartments
a their community volunteer service. Washington Park
Signature Point
mow. ft SUMMER PLAYGROUNDS Ridgegate Apartments
CAMPS The summer playground program James Street Apartments
Camp Waskowitz a week-long was created to enhance neighbor- Willow Brook Apartments
residential camp for 4th,5th and 6th hood parks and create a safe, fun Riverwood
graders had an all,time high atten- environment for families to enjoy *King County Housing
dance with 151 campers. The camp their parks. At both West Fenwick -Valli Kee Apartments
received a $5,000 donation from Park and Tot Lot, staff were able to *King County
Greg Mackie Sound Co. check out program equipment and Summer Work Training
SummerYouth Day Camp had 687 materials to residents for their use. Program
registered participants, .with. 3,360 . This was a drop-in program for any Urban Resources
accumulative participants over 42 neighborhood resident to enjoy. Partnership Grant
service days. The average daily at- *PL Sportswear
tendance was 80 campers `Kent Youth Family Services
Teen Camp had 98 teens registered VIDEO TEEN SHOW *Kent Community Council for
for the summer program. This was Opportunities for teens to experience at Risk Youth & Children
an increase of 64 teens over 1995. hands-on use of computers, *Lighthouse
1996 summer enrollment filled and camcorders and video production *Seattle/King County
a waiting list was taken. equipment. Teens have an oppor- Public Health
tunity to plan, produce and edit"their *Kent Police Department
FIELD TRIPS show"which may then be broadcast *Kent Senior Activity Center
A total of 35 field trips were taken. on Kent's Government Channel 29. *Seattle Mariners
665 youth and teens were able to *Seattle Sonics
_ participate. *Food Bank
-Volunteer Opportunities
*University of Washington
*Top Foods
B ; ; *McDonalds
_
*Latter Day Saints Church
WHAT THE
1 SAID:
(Quotes taken from youth/teen/parent evaluation forms) "They (young teens) felt they were old
enough to stay home—We did not—After a
"Yes-I would pay more to have as good as All he does is talk about his friends at this while on our days off from work, they wanted
place for him to be as this is" Parent of teen- camp" Parent of teenager attending Teen to come back to camp" Parent of 10 and 11
ager attending Teen Leadership Camp. Leadership Camp. year old children attending summer r
camp.
"I like the apartment location—I don't have "They feel how you feel." 'They were easy
transportation" to talk to."A teenager comments on staff. "I really enjoyed the week,but I really wish it
Parent of youth attending apartment recre- "We got to win prizes"A teen comments on was longer. The food was good and I love
ation. what he liked about a artment ro ram. camp" Camper at Camp Waskowitz.
P P 9 spo�_+ �
T.
F7>�, :"
z 3 3 zn c zz ._ z Z _ - r ` ` O >a
> L ^
>
Z ^r D
> Z
D
In
Ij
- - s
_o
rt C_i OC � W W S L V N
Y < U
c X
f. J ry
<y
Z Z z x m D v y z
n _ _ > >
77
_ m
5
aRC
Z
a > D
71
P rt
n
R
> z
V.
w N
tl� N r >
Wo
x
N
�i
N ^N) N
Z IX•, � r In H
- N
v y J w
N N N N N J U
Z � J
R
= T a
7
T �
N R
a
��f��- 2S��
CITV OF - lc � J I
--� Jim White, Mayor
PLANNING COMMITTEE MINUTES
September 17, 1996
Planning Committee Members Present- City Attorneys 0=ice
Leona Orr, Chair Roger Lubovich
Tim Clark Laurie Evezich
Tom Brubaker
Planning Staff
Fred Satterstrom, Planning Manager
Matt Jackson, GIS PIanner
Brian Swanberg, Code Enforcement Officer
Margaret Porter, Administrative Assistant III
Other
Sue Olson
Bob Tidball
Ron Harmon
KENT JUNK ORDINANCE - (F. Satterstrom)
Planning Manager Fred Satterstrom informed the Committee that according to Police Chief Ed
Crawford there would be "no significant impact to the police department related to towins and
storage fees."
Chair Leona Orr questioned Code Enforcement Officer Brian Swanberg wh--ther he had any
information to add. He stated that there will be an initial period needed to work out the mechanics
of this process.
Tim Clark MOVED to send this item to the City Council meeting of October 1, 1996, under the
consent calendar for final approval of the full council. Chair Orr SECONDED this motion.
(Committee member Jon Johnson was absent from this meeting; however, the Planning Department
contacted him and he concurred with this motion.) Motion carried. v
HOME OCCUPATION DEVELOPMENT AND PERFORMANCE STANDARDS - (L. Orr)
Chair Leona Orr explained that this item is a potential Zoning Code amendment to expand the uses
exempt from the home occupation development and performance standards. Chair Orr further
explained that she would like the Committee to send this item to the Land Use and Planning Board
to hear this issue.
Sue Olson, 815 Marian Place, operates a Home Occupation business within the City of Kent. She
explained that her program meets the description of a "preschool" and would like the City to
consider a Zoning Code amendment to exempt preschools from home occupation development and
"Il.lih.4VE.SO.. /F:E\'T.N'ASHLVGTOK 9%(li'-$g9i/TELEPHOSE Cllh %$4-.70((/FAX#854-==:a '
City Council Planning Committee Minutes
September 17, 1996
performance standards. Her proposal is to change the section 15.08.040 of the Zoning Code as '
indicated below:
Sec 15.08.040. Home Occupations.
B. Home occupations permitted. Home occupations which meet the
requirements of this section are permitted in every zone where a dwelling unit was
lawfully established. The requirements of this section shall not apply to the
following home occupations:
1. Home child care or preschools.
Ms. Olson explained the basic operation of her Kindermusic program. The Kindermusic program
is in place throughout the United States and has been operating successfully for more than twenty
years. She emphasized that a Kindermusic or a piano teacher could not be successful if they are
limited to four students per day.
Committee member Tim Clark MOVED and Chair Orr SECONDED a motion to send this item to
the Land Use and Planning Board for their consideration. (Committee member Jon Johnson was
absent from this meeting; however,the Planning Department contacted him and he concurred with
this motion.) Motion carried.
COUNTYWIDE PLANNING POLICIES/RATIFICATION - (F. Satterstrom)
Planning Manager Fred Satterstrom explained that any change to Countywide Planning Policies _.
must be ratified by thirty percent (30%) of the jurisdictions in King County that represents
seventy percent(70%) of the population. Mr. Satterstrom further explained that the proposed change
does not directly effect the City of Kent; the change relates to the City of North Bend.
Staff recommended that this item be sent to the City Council on October 1, 1996 for ratification.
Committee member Tim Clark MOVED and Chair Orr SECONDED to send this item to the full
council on October 1, 1996 under the consent calendar for ratification. (Committee member Jon
Johnson was absent from this meeting, however, the Planning Department contacted him and he
concurred with this motion.) Motion carried.
Added items:
HEARING EXAMINER DECISION APPEAL PROCESS - (L. Evezich)
Assistant City Attorney Laurie Evezich explained that there is an inconsistency between the City of
Kent's Hearing Examiner Ordinance and the State law regarding the time permitted for an appeal
of adverse decision.
Ms. Evezich asked for the Committee's permission to bring a proposed ordinance to the next
meeting for consideration. The Committee concurred.
REGIONAL JTJSTICE CENTER MITIGATION AGREEMENT - (M. Porter)
Administrative Assistant Margaret Porter explained that under the Regional Justice Center
Mitigation Agreement the County agreed to provide the City of Kent, with the amount of S200,000
2
City Council Planning Committee Minutes
September 17, 1996
for human services. Ms. Porter requested that the Committee establish a budget of$200,000 per the
Mitigation Agreement and approval to expend these funds in the amount of$200,000, and to forward
this item to the City Council on October 1, 1996, for final approval.
Committee member Tim Clark MOVED to establish a budget in the amount of$200,000 as part of
the Regional Justice Center Mitigation Agreement for human services and approval to expend these
funds in the amount of$200,000, and forward this item to the City Council on October 1, 1996.
Chair Leona Orr SECONDED the motion. Motion carried.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 4:25 p.m.
PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE
October 2, 1996
PRESENT: Tim Clark Ed White
Connie Epperly Larry Webb
Don Wickstrom
ABSENT: Judy Woods
Wickstrom said that numerous inquiries have been received regarding the City's traffic control
plan. We do have a program with an established criteria which we want to make sure that Council
is aware of, however the criteria may need adjusting. Wickstrom stated that we do need criteria
as we don't want speed humps on streets with high volumes of traffic. He noted that speed humps
would adversely affect emergency service vehicles.
Ed White explained that the Neighborhood Traffic Control Plan is the City's outreach to the
neighborhoods regarding traffic related concerns. He said that we provide information to the
communities on traffic flows and characteristics of the roadways. Ed noted that most of the time
the concerns are related to traffic volume, mainly traffic cutting thru neighborhoods to avoid a
higher congested area and also, child safety. Ed explained that in determining the criteria, we
use a figure of 1,000 vehicles per day in a residential area. The other criteria used is vehicle
speed - the established speed limit plus IOmph over. .Anything greater than that would indicate
some corrective measures need to be taken. He noted that the lOmph over accounts for the
general characteristics of the roadway as well as vehicle speedometer flaws. He said after
providing information to the neighborhoods thru our meetings, we get them involved by training
on the use of radar guns. Ed stated that when necessary, physical improvements are required such
as speed humps, chokers, traffic islands or sometimes complete road closures.
Larry Webb addressed the issue of road restrictions as related to public safety vehicles. He said
the public safety services would include ambulance companies, medic units, fire engines, etc.
Webb noted that speed humps cause excessive damage to fire engines. Regarding traffic islands,
Webb stated that most fire engines would have to travel in the oncoming lane to go around an
island and a choker would slow down emergency service. In response to Clark, Webb stated that
in most instances an emergency can be responded to within 5 minutes.
Wickstrom stated that we can't address everything and it's difficult to please everyone. He said
we could install speed humps to slow down a few speeders but where is the criteria when we don't
want speed humps? With definitive criteria, we can then define what we can do and move on.
We should look at what we can address with a certain criteria also in keeping with the needs of
emergency vehicles.
1
In response to Clark regarding sidewalk installations, Wickstrom said that annually the cost for
sidewalks is at least $300,000 and we are still trying to rehab existing damaged sidewalks. We
have been able to address additional sidewalk or walkway problems, for example Park Orchard
Elementary and Sequoia Jr. High, Totem Jr. High, and Star Lake Elementary and also 100th
Avenue S.E.. Wickstrom also noted that we have been unsuccessful in securing grants from the
State for sidewalk projects.
Committee unanimously recommended that Council concur with the threshold criteria established
for the Neighborhood Traffic Control Program.
In response to Mrs. Rust regarding the traffic island concept, Ed stated that we have looked into
this. However at this time, the neighborhoods feel that speed humps will solve their problems.
He further stated that the most expensive traffic control device are traffic circles which have a
high maintenance cost.
Meeker Street Sidewalk - Accep anc
Wickstrom explained that this is before the Committee because it is 10.5% over the contract
amount. He said the overage is due to excessive excavating after some old gas tanks were found
buried underground. This also entailed more money for cleanup.
Committee unanimously recommended that the Meeker Street Sidewalk project be accepted as
complete.
Meeting adjourned: 4:00 p.m.
2