HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Meeting - Council - Agenda - 10/01/1996no
Mayor Jim White
Council Members
Christi Houser, President
Jim Bennett Jon Johnson
Tim Clark Leona Orr
Connie Epperly Judy Woods
October 1, 1996
Office of the City Clerk
CITY OF 70�7�f7s SUMMARY AGENDA
;1 KENT CITY COUNCIL MEETING
October 1, 1996
Council Chambers
V 7:00 p.m.
MAYOR: Jim White COUNCILMEMBERS: Christi Houser, President
Jim Bennett Tim Clark Connie Epperly
Jon Johnson Leona Orr Judy Woods
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
1. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
,. mP y
A. - � to ee of the Month
ram. �'rc
2. PUBLIC HEARINGS
None
3. CONSENT CALENDAR
A.' Approval of Minutes
B.- Approval of Bills
C.- Van Doren's Landing, Building I, Rezone RZ-96-4 -
ordinance I _.... _.
D: Workshop on 1997 Preliminary Budget -tiSSet Date
E: Excused Council Absence - Houser
F.� Street Vacation - Saar/Railroad Ave. - Resolution !4
5_etting Hearing Date
G. Utility Tax/Sunset Concurrency -,Ordinance
H.- Junk Vehicles - Ordinance
I.- Regional Justice Center Mitigation Agreement Funds -
Establish Budget
J.-- Amendment to Countywide Planning Policies -
Ratification -Resolution
(/�
K.' Little Bend - Bill of Sale
L.' S.E. 208th Agreement with King County - Authorization
M.- Corrections Facility Food Service Contract - Extension
N.- Contract with City of Federal Way for Housing of
Inmates - Approval
0.- Boating Safety Program Application - Approval
P.- Bureau of Justice Assistance Block Grant Application -
Approval
Q.� Russell Road Street Vacation - Ordinance (�
R.- Beck Short Plat Sewer Extension - Bill of Sale
a .— Go wv�cj Aw s,"Ce - ( A"jZtt
4. OTHER BUSINESS
A. Disaster Reimbursement Funds - Authorization to
Distribute
B.- Compression Brakes - Ordinance
5. BIDS
None
6. CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS
7. REPORTS
... 7!�p - EXECUTIVE SESSION: Property Acquisition
8. ADJOURNMENT
NOTE: A copy of the full agenda packet is available for perusal in the City Clerk's Office and the Kent Library.
An explanation of the agenda format is given on the back of this page.
Any person requiring a disability accommodation should contact the City in advance for more information. For TDO relay
service call 1-800-635-9993 or the City of Kent (206) 854-6587.
PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
Citizens wishing to address the Council will, at this time,
make known the subject of interest, so all may be properly
heard.
A) Employee of the Month
1 ,
VUNE �,
r
CONSENT CALENDAR
3. City Council Action:
Councilmember C,Cs': J moves, Councilmember-t
seconds that Consent Calendar Items A through-K'be approved.
J
Discuss
Act
3A. Approval of Minutes.
Approval of the minutes of
September 17, 1996.
the regular Council meeting of
3B. Approval of Bills.
Approval of payment of the bills
and paid on September 16, 1996.
meeting scheduled for September
Vouchers signed and approved at
September 17, 1996.
received through September 16
The Operations Committee
18, 1996, was cancelled.
the Council meeting of
Approval of checks issued for vouchers:
Date Check Numbers
9/16/96 173775-174395
Amount
$2,137,763.42
Approval of checks issued for payroll for September 1 through
September 15, and paid on September 20, 1996.
Date
Check Numbers
9/20/96 Checks 214462-214765
9/20/96 Advices 38211-38659
Amount
$ 260,297.37
$ 594,388.88
$ 854,686.25
Council Agenda
Item No. 3 A-B
Kent, Washington
September 17, 1996
Regular meeting of the Kent City Council was called to order at
7:00 p.m. by Mayor White. Present: Councilmembers Clark,
Epperly, Houser, Orr and Woods, Operations Director/Chief of
Staff McFall, City Attorney Lubovich, Public Works Director
Wickstrom, Fire Chief Angelo, Police Chief Crawford, Parks
Director Hodgson, and Finance Director Miller. Councilmember
Johnson was excused from the meeting. Approximately 30 people
were in attendance.
PUBLIC Regional Justice Center Update. Tom Brown dis-
COMMUNICATIONS tributed copies of the monthly Executive Summary,
displayed a photograph of the site, and noted
that the dome and the column wraps on the pillars
for the Courts Building are complete. He noted
that the exterior of the Courts Building and the
parking structure is complete, and that interior
work is now the emphasis. Brown noted that the
roadwork from James Street to Fourth Avenue is
95% complete, and that the planting of the lawn,
including integrating the artwork in the front
lawn, will begin in October. He added that the
project is on time and within budget.
Norway Sister City Program. Alana McIalwain,
Chair of the Norway Sister City Program, noted
that Co -Chair Howard Olivers recently visited
Sister City officials in Norway. She announced a
meeting of the Norway Sister City Committee to be
held on September 19 at 4:00 p.m. at Green River
Community College and invited anyone interested
to attend.
Howard Olivers thanked the Mayor and Council for
approving this Sister City relationship. He then
presented to the Mayor a vase which was hand
painted in Norway. He noted that the people of
Norway preserve their heritage, and that it is
important to them to live peacefully with other
cultures. He also presented the Mayor with a
report from the group and a book on the history
of Naustdal. Mayor White extended thanks and
appreciation to the Committee and volunteers.
Constitution Week. Mayor White read a pro-
clamation declaring September 17-23, 1996, as
Constitution Week in the City of Kent and
encouraged all citizens to reflect on the many
benefits of the Federal Constitution and American
citizenship. The proclamation was presented to
Marcella Burkett, who thanked the Mayor and
Council for their continued support.
1
September 17, 1996
PUBLIC Day of Concern for the Hungry. The Mayor noted
COMMUNICATIONS that the Seattle Emergency Feeding Program has
invited the City of Kent to join in an effort
to end hunger in our city, and read a proclama-
tion declaring September 28, 1996 as Day of
Concern for the Hungry in the City of Kent. He
urged all citizens of Kent to join with the
Seattle Emergency Feeding Program to feed those
who are hungry.
Arthur Lee of the Emergency Feeding Program noted
that the Program has grown from nine stores four
years ago to over 120 stores this year. He noted
that donations will be accepted at Albertsons and
Safeway stores on September 28th and encouraged
citizens to donate.
National Payroll Week. Mayor White read a pro-
clamation declaring the week of September 16-20,
1996 as National Payroll Week in the City of Kent
and encouraged all citizens to support the out-
standing work of payroll professionals. He
introduced Accounting Manager Laurie Murray, who
commended Holly Enfield, Brigitte Hoopes and
Kandyce Korhonen on a job well done.
CONSENT
HOUSER MOVED that Consent Calendar Items A
CALENDAR
through J be approved. Woods seconded and the
motion carried unanimously.
MINUTES
(CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3A)
Approval of Minutes. Approval of the minutes of
the regular Council meeting of September 3, 1996.
WATER
(CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3I)
Kent Springs Transmission Main Repair. ACCEPT
as complete the contract with Frank Coluccio
Construction for the Kent Springs Transmission
Main Repair project and release retainage after
State releases, as recommended by the Public
Works Director. The original contract amount was
$895,871.10. The final construction cost was
$911,757.04.
PUBLIC WORKS
(CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3H)
Surplus Vehicles. AUTHORIZATION to declare
certain Equipment Rental vehicles and equipment
no longer needed by the City as surplus, and
authorize the sale thereof, as recommended by the
Public Works Committee.
is
September 17, 1996
COMMUNITY (PUBLIC HEARING - ITEM 2B)
DEVELOPMENT 1977 Community Development Block Grant Program.
BLOCK GRANT This date has been set for a public hearing to
PROGRAM consider adoption of the proposed 1997 Community
Development Block Grant Program, including the
contingency plans for estimated entitlement
changes, as recommended by the Planning
Committee.
Carolyn Sundvall of the Planning Department noted
that the total for the proposed program is esti-
mated at $576,263, which is a 32% increase from
the previous year's funding. She explained that
the contingency plan will address any potential
entitlement changes once the Federal Congres-
sional Budget is passed. She outlined the
projects as follows:
CAPITAL
Recommended Funding
City of Kent $230,096
Home Repair Services Prg
City of Kent, Parks & Rec 96,294
Renovate Park - Tot Lot 04 (Phase II)
Easter Seals of Washington 18,250
Access Modification Rehab
King County Housing Authority 50,000
Nike Residential Rehab
Mental Health Housing Foundation 16,774
Buccheit Gardens Acquisition
Mental Health Housing Foundation 10,172
Tall Firs Rehab
United Cerebral Palsy 15,000
Acquisition
Total Capital $436,586
PLANNING & ADMINISTRATION $ 65,428
CONTINGENCY PLAN FOR INCREASE & DECREASE OF
CAPITAL FUNDS
If Kent's CDBG Capital dollars increase from the
current estimate then any additional dollars
would be carried over into the 1998 program year.
01
September 17, 1996
COMMUNITY If Kent's CDBG Capital Dollars decrease from the
DEVELOPMENT current estimate then:
BLOCK GRANT
PROGRAM 1st The City of Kent Parks Dept. Tot Lot Phase
II would be decreased up to $26,000.
2nd Any additional decrease would be split
proportionately among the remaining
projects.
PUBLIC (HUMAN) SERVICES Recommending Funding
Catholic Community Services $10,000
Springwood Food Bank
Community Health Centers of $18,555
King County, Kent Clinic
Connection, Adult Day Care 51000
Elderhealth NW
Emergency Feeding Program 10,132
of Seattle -King County
YWCA of Seattle -King County 30,562
Domestic Violence Housing
Total Public (Human) Services $74,249
CONTINGENCY PLAN FOR INCREASE AND DECREASE OF
PUBLIC (HUMAN) SERVICE FUNDS
If Kent's CDBG Public (Human) Service dollars
increase from the current estimate then:
1st The increase will be split between the
Community Health Centers of King County &
the YWCA, up to their requested amounts.
2nd In the event that the increase exceeds
this amount, then any additional increase
would fund Community Health Center of King
County Primary Dental Program up to the
1997 General Fund request.
If Kent's CDBG (Public) Human Service dollars
decrease from the current estimate then:
1st The decrease will be split evenly between
the Community Health Centers of King
County & the YWCA, to the 1996 funding level.
4
September 17, 1996
COMMUNITY 2nd If the decrease is more than that amount,
DEVELOPMENT the Emergency Feeding program would be
BLOCK GRANT reduced to the 1996 funding level.
PROGRAM
3rd Any additional decreases will be split
evenly among all the agencies with the
exception of Connections, as they are
funded at the minimum level of $5,000.
Mayor White opened the public hearing. Kate
Cadoo, Resource Development Manager with
Community Health Centers of King County, thanked
the Council for their past support and encouraged
support of funding as recommended. She explained
for Clark that legal immigrants are served, but
that that is not one of the qualifiers. She
added that they serve both Medicaid recipients
and those who do not have any health coverage.
Lin Houston, Office of Housing and Human
Services, pointed out that the naturopathic
public health clinic serves immigrants. Upon
Clark's question, Cadoo stated that approxi-
mately 25% of the people being served at the Kent
Community Health Center are non-English speaking.
Arthur Lee of the Emergency Feeding Program
expressed appreciation for Council's continued
support, and noted that requests for services are
increasing.
There were no further comments from the audience
and HOUSER MOVED to close the public hearing.
Orr seconded and the motion carried.
ORR MOVED to adopt the 1997 Community Development
Block Grant Program, including the contingency
plans for estimated entitlement changes, as
recommended by the Planning Committee. Woods
seconded and the motion carried.
ZONING CODE (OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4A)
AMENDMENT stream Buffer Requirements ZCA-96-4. The City is
acting under an interim ordinance that has main-
tained King County standards for stream setback
requirements within the Meridian Annexation area.
The interim ordinance will expire on October 1,
1996. The Planning Committee has recommended
approval of an ordinance pertaining to the Soos
Creek Basin Stream Buffers within the Meridian
Annexation area. This ordinance imposes buffers
similar to, but not more restrictive than, the
County's stream buffer requirements.
5
September 17, 1996
ZONING CODE ORR MOVED to adopt Ordinance No. 3312 pertaining
AMENDMENT to Soos Creek Basin Stream Buffers within the
Meridian Annexation. Houser seconded and the
motion carried.
REZONE (OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4B)
Van Doren's Landing, Building I, Rezone RZ-96-4.
The Hearing Examiner has recommended approval of
an application by Dan Ivanoff of MBK Northwest,
to rezone approximately 11.93 acres of property
from M-1, Industrial Park District, to M1-C,
Industrial Park District - Commercial Suffix.
The property is located at the southwest corner
of the intersection of S. 228th Street and West
Valley Highway.
ORR MOVED to accept the Findings of the Hearing
Examiner, to adopt the Hearing Examiner's recom-
mendation of approval of the Van Doren's Landing
Building I Rezone, and to direct the City
Attorney to prepare the necessary ordinance.
Houser seconded and the motion carried.
ANNEXATION (OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4C)
Green River Annexation AN-96-2. This date has
been set for a meeting with the initiators of the
Green River Annexation, an area of approximately
595 acres located south of the Green River and
north of S. 277th Street. Staff recommends that
Council accept the 10% annexation petition and
authorize circulation of the 60% petition subject
to the city's existing indebtedness.
Planning Manager Satterstrom pointed out the
boundaries of the area and noted that it is
predominantly agricultural. He explained that
King County acquired development rights several
years ago. He noted that the area contains
approximately 15 homes and 42 persons. He stated
that one parcel of property is presently before
King County and is generating a bit of contro-
versy. Satterstrom noted that the total assessed
valuation is approximately $5.6 million and the
expected revenue is about $14,300. He said that
the area is within the Potential Annexation Area
and is consistent with annexation policies.
There were no comments from the audience, and ORR
MOVED to accept the 10% annexation petition,
that the proposed Green River Annexation Area
boundaries be established as presented by
11
September 17, 1996
REZONE staff, that the 60% petition for annexation as
set forth in RCW 35A.14.120 be authorized for
circulation in the Green River Annexation Area,
that the area, upon annexation, be subject to its
proportionate share of the existing indebtedness
of the City of Kent, and that the area be subject
to the interim zoning requirements for newly
annexed areas set forth in the Kent City Code.
Houser seconded and the motion carried.
COUNCIL (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3J)
Councilmember Absence. APPROVAL of Councilmember
Johnson's request for an excused absence from the
September 17, 1996, City Council meeting, as he
is unable to attend.
PARKS & (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3C)
RECREATION Discovery Grant. ACCEPT and amend the budget
for $5,000 received from the State of Washington
Division of Developmental Disabilities to be used
for specialized recreation programs, as recom-
mended by the Parks Committee on September 3,
1996.
The State of Washington Division of Developmental
Disabilities has contributed an additional $5,000
to the original $15,000 Discovery Grant accepted
and appropriated in March 1996. The funding is
to be used for a Specialized Recreation Youth/
Teen Community Inclusion Coordinator and a
Saturday Play Program for children with special
needs.
(CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3D)
Pea Patch Grant. ACCEPT and establish a
budget for $19,595 received from Urban Resources
Partnership for the community pea patch program,
as recommended by the Parks Committee on
September 3, 1996.
The first youth -facilitated pea patch gardens
funded through the Puget Sound Urban Resources
Partnership Grant in the amount of $19,595 were
developed in 1995 for 1996. Funding provided
materials and compensation for ten teens to work
in the program.
(CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3E)
Work Training Grant. ACCEPT and establish a
budget for $12,978 received from King County for
the Summer Trails Program, as recommended by the
Parks Committee on September 3, 1996.
7
September 17, 1996
PARKS & With $12,978 funded from King County, Community
RECREATION Services Division, the Summer Trails Teen Work
Program was created for youth to build trails in
the park system throughout the summer.
(CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3F)
Mobile Recreation/Computer Grant. AUTHORIZATION
to amend the 1996 budget to allow for the expen-
diture of $38,000 received from King County for
the Mobile Recreation/Computer Program, as recom-
mended by the Parks Committee on September 3,
1996.
In 1995, the Parks Committee accepted a $38,000
King County grant awarding the Youth/Teen Program
funds to purchase a vehicle that provides a
mobile recreation and computer program for local
youth. The actual expenditure took place in
1996, therefore the appropriation to expend the
funds needs to be carried over to 1996.
(CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3G)
King County Conservation Futures Interlocal
Cooperation Agreement. Authorization for the
Mayor to sign an amendment to the 1990
Conservation Futures Interlocal Cooperation
Agreement between King County and the City of
Kent to include the allocation of the 1994/95
Conservation Futures Fund and to accept and
establish a budget for the $200,000 grant, as re-
commended by the Parks Committee on September 3,
1996. Through the 1994/95 Conservation Futures
Grant competition, the City of Kent has been
recommended to receive $200,000 towards the
acquisition of 14.5 acres on the East Hill of
Kent.
(BIDS - ITEM 5A)
Kiwanis Tot Lot No. 4, Phase I. Two bids were
received on September 10, 1996 for the Kiwanis
Tot Lot No. 4, Phase I. Both bids exceeded the
Engineer's estimate.
Parks Administration Superintendent Wickstrom
explained that the Engineer feels his estimate is
good, and recommended rejection of both bids.
She added that combining Phases I and II would
result in better bids and would be more
efficient.
8
September 17, 1996
PARKS & WOODS MOVED to reject both bids received on
RECREATION Kiwanis Tot Lot No. 4, Phase I. Orr seconded
and the motion carried.
FINANCE (PUBLIC HEARING - ITEM 2A)
1997-2002 capital Facilities Plan. This is the
second public hearing on the City's 1997-2002
Capital Facility Plan. The public is encouraged
to provide input on capital projects needed
during the next six years.
Finance Director Miller noted that funds must be
available to balance the capital plans, and that
the Plan totals $181,000,000. She said that the
plan includes parks, public safety, water, sewer,
drainage and general government facilities, and
that most are public works projects. She noted
that the plan is in balance for the next six
years with the exception of a deficit position in
the Public Works Street Division. She explained
that the 1% utility tax enacted last year will
sunset in the year 2000, and said the Public
Works Committee will discuss that issue soon.
Miller noted that the plan has been reviewed by
the Operations Committee, and that the plan will
go to the Land Use and Planning Board who will
hold an additional public hearing, after which it
will come back to Council for adoption as part of
the annual update of the Comprehensive Plan.
Mayor White opened the public hearing. There
were no comments from the audience and HOUSER
MOVED to close the public hearing. Orr seconded
and the motion carried.
(CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3B)
Approval of Bills. APPROVAL of payment of the
bills received through August 30 and paid on
August 30, 1996, after auditing by the Operations
Committee on September 4, 1996.
Approval of checks issued for vouchers:
Date Check Numbers Amount
8/30/96 173038-173774 $2,761,593.40
9
September 17, 1996
FINANCE Approval of checks issued for payroll for
August 16 through August 31 and paid on
September 5, 1996:
Date Check Numbers Amount
9/5/96 Checks 214121-214461 $ 265,430.22
9/5/96 Advices 37757-38210 $ 574,682.28
$ 840,112.50
REPORTS Public Works Committee. Clark announced that
the Committee will meet at 3:30 p.m. on
September 18th.
Planning Committee. Orr noted that the next
Committee meeting will be held at 4:00 p.m. on
October 15th.
Administrative Reports. McFall encouraged
Council attendance at the Open House to be held
at City Hall from 12:00 to 3:00 p.m. on Saturday,
September 21st.
ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 7:50 p.m.
Brenda Jac er CMC
City Cler
10
Kent City Council Meeting
Date October 1, 1996
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: VAN DOREN'S LANDING, BUILDING I, REZONE RZ-96-4 -
ORDINANCE
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Adoption of Ordinance No. rezoning
approximately 11.93 acres from M1, Industrial Park District to
M1-C, Industrial Park District "C" suffix.
3. EXHIBITS: Ordinance
4. RECOMMENDED BY: Hearing Examiner
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
0
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ N/A
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 3C
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of
Kent, Washington, relating to Land Use and Zoning, rezoning
approximately 1 1.93 acres from M-1 Industrial Park District, to
MI-C, Industrial Park District "C" suffix. (Van Doren's Landing
Building "I").
WHEREAS, an application to rezone approximately 11.93 acres from the
current zoning of M-1 Industrial Park District, to MI-C, Industrial Park District "C" suffix
was filed on March 29, 1996; and
WHEREAS, the applicant's property is located at the southwest corner of the
intersection of 228th Street and West Valley Highway; and
WHEREAS, the responsible official issued a Mitigated Determination of
Nonsignificance (MDNS) for the proposed rezone on April 30, 1996 with conditions
which require mitigation for impacts to traffic, water quality, water quantity and wetlands;
and
WHEREAS, a public hearing on the Van Doren's Landing Building "I" was
held before the Hearing Examiner on July 31, 1996; and
WHEREAS, the Hearing Examiner issued findings that the Van Doren's
Landing Building "I" Rezone is consistent with the Citv Comprehensive Plan, that the
proposed rezone and subsequent development activity would be compatible with the
development in the vicinity, that the proposed rezone will not unduly burden the
transportation system in the vicinity of the property with significant adverse impacts which
cannot be mitigated, that circumstances have changed since the establishment of the
current zoning district to warrant the proposed rezone, and that the proposed rezone will
not adversely affect the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of
Kent; and
WHEREAS, the findings are consistent with the standards for rezone set forth
in Section 15.09.050(C) of the Kent City Code; and
WHEREAS, the Kent Hearing Examiner recommended approval of the Van
Doren's Landing Building "I" Rezone on July 31, 1996; and
WHEREAS, the City Council moved to accept the findings of the Hearing
Examiner and adopt the Hearing Examiner's recommendation for approval of the Van
Doren's Landing Building 'I" Rezone from M-1, Industrial Park District, to MI-C Industrial
Park District - "C" suffix, NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES
HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The property located at the southwest corner of the
intersection of S. 228th Street and West Vallev Highway, Kent, Washington consisting of
approximately 11.93 acres and depicted in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated
herein by this reference is rezoned from M-1 Industrial Park District, to MI-C Industrial
Park District - "C" suffix.
SECTION 2. If any one or more sections, sub -sections, or sentences of this
Ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance and the same shall remain in full force
and effect.
SECTION 3. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force five (S) days
from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law.
JIM WHITE, NIAYOR
ATTEST:
BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ROGER A. LUBOVICH, CITY ATTORNEY
3
PASSED day of , 1996.
APPROVED day of , 1996.
PUBLISHED day of , 1996.
I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No. _, passed by the
City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the City of
Kent as hereon indicated.
BRENDA JACOB ER, CITY CLERK
a
(S EA U
EX�8IV �
TOTAL PARCEL
THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS 1, 2,3 AND 4, BLOCK 1, VAN DOREN'S LANDING, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT
THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUIM 158 OF PLATS, PAGES 71 THROUGH 75, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY,
WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS A WHOLE AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE WEST 50.05 FEET OF SAID LOT 2, THENCE SOUTH
OOo52'24" WEST 373.19 FEET ALONG SAID EAST LINE AND ITS SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION; THENCE
NORTH 89o09'14" WEST 2-1.1.51 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF LOT A OF CITY" OF KENT LOT LINE
ADJUSTIv[E T NO. LL-94-22 AS RECORDED UNDER KING COLS Y RECORDING NO. 9410101663; THENCE
SOUTH 00o5224" WEST 222.66 FEET ALONG LAST SAID EAST LINE TO THE NORTH LINE OF LOT C OF CITY
OF KENT LOT LINE ADJUSTME-NT NO. LL-93-9 AS RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO.
9308101512: THENCE SOUTH 37o 15'04" EAST 19I.57 FEET ALONG SAID NORTH LING TO THE NiORT`K1,VEST
CORNER OF LOT 5. SAID BLOCK I: THENCE SOUTH 89c0736" 'EAST 460.05 FEET ALONG i KE NORTH LINE
OF SAID LOT 5 TO THE EAST LINE THEREOF; THENCE SOUTH 00c52'24" WEST 400.00 FEET ALONG LAST
SAID EAST LINE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT I; THENCE SOUTH 99o07'36" EAST 249.59 FEET .�? ONG
SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE ALONG LAST S_`= EAST LINE THE
FOLLOWING FOUR COURSES: THENCE NORTK 00c= i'13" EAST 704.19 FEET; T- ENCE NORTH
WEST 124.65 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89c07'S4" WEST 124.-8 FEET: Tf -NCE NORTH OOcSi'13" EAST IS3.91
FEET TO THE NORTH LPBE OF SAID BLOCK 1; THENCE VORT 39c09'14" WEST 43:.:5 FEET ALONG LAST
SAIDNORTH LINE TO Tr POINT OF BEGiti-MNG.
City of Kent - Planning Department
+.f
I I 1 1
I I I I
1 1 I I
I I 1 I
APPLICATION NAME: Van Doren's Landina
NUMBER: ,rRZ-96-4
REQUEST: Rezone
Zoning/Topography
DATE: July 3, 1996
LEGEND
Application site
Zoning boundary
r-r7-r7-rTT City Limits
A
City of Kent - Planning Department
APPLICATION NAME: Van Doren's Landing
NUMBER: YRZ-96-4
REQUEST: Rezone
Site Plan
DATE: July 3, 1996
LEGEND
Application site
Kent City Council Meeting
Date October 1, 1996
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: WORKSHOP ON 1997 PRELIMINARY BUDGET - SET DATE
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Authorization to set October 15, 1996,
at 5:30 p.m. as the date and time for a Council Workshop on the
1997 Preliminary Budget.
3. EXHIBITS: None
4. RECOMMENDED BY: Finance Director
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5.
[IN
7.
UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS•
CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
S, Councilmember
seconds
Council Agenda
Item No. 3D
Kent City Council Meeting
Date October 1, 1996
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: EXCUSED COUNCIL ABSENCE
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Approval of an excused absence from the
October 1, 1996, City Council meeting for Council President
Houser, as she is unable to attend.
3.
4
5
29
7.
EXHIBITS: Memorandum
RECOMMENDED BY: Christi Houser
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 3E
MEMORANDUM
DATE: September 23, 1996
TO: Jon Johnson, President Pro Tempore
City Council Members
FROM: Christi Houser, Council President
SUBJECT: City Council Excused Absence
I would like to request an excused absence for the October 1, 1996 City Council meeting. I will be out of town
and unable to attend.
Thank you for your consideration.
CH:kno
Kent City Council Meeting
Date October 1, 1996
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: STREET VACATION - SAAR/RAILROAD AVE. - RESOLUTION
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Adoption of Resolution No. setting
the hearing date for November 5th for the Saar/Railroad Ave.
Street Vacation, as recommended by the Public Works Committee.
3.
4.
N.
7
The Public Works Department has received a request from Mary A.
Hofling to vacate a portion of Saar Street at Railroad Avenue.
EXHIBITS: Public Works memorandum, Public Works minutes,
vicinity map and resolution
RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
econds
Council Agenda
Item No. 3F
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
September 13, 1996
TO: Public Works Committee
FROM: Don Wickstrom
RE: Street Vacation - Saar & Railroad Avenue
We have received a valid petition from Mary H. Hotting of Kent, to vacate a portion
of Saar St. between the alley and Railroad Ave. In accordance with State law, a
Public Hearing thereon must be held. As such, we recommend adoption of a
resolution which sets the Public Hearing date.
ACTION: Recommend adoption of a Resolution setting a hearing date for the
Saar/Railroad Ave. Street Vacation.
Tim Clark clarified the issue and stated that basically, the Growth Management Act
requires that we stay concurrent with the population growth. One of the elements is
capacity of the transportation system which means capacity on the roads and, if we do
not bring our Capital Improvement Plan up to speed to meet those demands, the City
will be forced to stop issuing building permits. Wicicstrom concurred.
Committee unanimously recommended that the Utilitv Tax Sunset Clause be extended
to December 3 1, 2006.
0 Street Vacation - Saar & Railroad Avenue
Wicicstrom said we have received a request for a street vacation and at this time we are
asking the Committee to recommend setting a public hearing date before Council.
When a petition is submitted we are required to act on it within a specified number of
days. Wiccstrom noted that there is however, a house in the right of sway which has
been there for sometime. He said this will need to be addressed when it goes before the
Public Hearing.
Comas-duee unanimously recommended adoption of a resolution setting a hearing date
for the Saar/Railroad Ave. Street Vacation.
Meeting adjourned: 4:00 p.m.
r---
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION of the City of Kent, Washington,
regarding the vacation of a portion of Saar Street lying east of
South Railroad Avenue in the City of Kent, and setting the public
hearing on the proposed street vacation for November 5, 1996.
WHEREAS, a petition (a copy of which is attached as Exhibit A) has been filed
"A " f St..
by an adjacent property owner to vacate a portion of Pussplkkaad, a dedicated, opened public
street, lying east of South Railroad Avenue in the City of Kent, King County, Washington; and
WHEREAS, the property owner owns at least two-thirds of the property abutting
Sacsr s#.
that portion of well -- that is now being sought to be vacated; and
WHEREAS, the petition is in all respects proper. NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KFNT, WASHINGTON DOES HEREBY
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. A public hearing on the street vacation petition requesting the
SQnf S't'.
vacation of a portion of R* s5- LRoaei, a dedicated, opened public street, lying east of South
Railroad Avenue shall be held at a regular meeting of the Kent City Council at 7:00 p.m.,
Tuesday, November 5, 1996, in the Council Chambers of City Hall located at 220 4th Avenue
South, Kent, Washington, 98032.
1
Section 2. The City Clerk shall give proper notice of the hearing and cause the
notice to be posted as provided by law.
Section 3. The Planning director shall obtain the necessary approval or rejection
or other information from the Public Works Department and other appropriate departments
and shall transmit information to the Council so that the Council may consider the matter at
its regularly scheduled meeting on November 5, 1996.
Passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington
this day of 1996.
Concurred in by the Mayor of the City of Kent, Washington, this _ day of
1996.
ATTEST:
BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ROGER A. LUBOVICH, CITY ATTORNEY
E
JIM WHITE, MAYOR
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of Resolution No.
passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, the day of 1996.
EAL)
BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK
STVAC#13.res
3
T
MAIL TO:
CITY OF KENT
Property Management
220 So. 4th Ave.
Kent, WA_98032
Attn: G7
uu0 I to,C u �[
�� SEP 4 1.4Ra
CITY o LEE"T
CrIY 13K
APPLICANT:
NAME:
Address: -i'i' w
Phone: e
STREET AND/OR ALLEY VACATION APPLICATION AND PETITION
Dear Mayor and Kent City Council:
We, the undersigned abutting property owners, hereby respectfully request
that certain _ hereby be vacated. (General Location)
Legal description
(Must Contain Total Square Feet of Area Sough`_ To Ee. Vacai-sd;
i
iS NEii1G SJULt1:i'
I
Sufficient proof, copy of deed contract etc. supported by Sing County
Tax Rolls shall be submitted for verification of signatures. 11itho_it
these a "CURRENT" title report shall be required. When Corporations,
Partnerships etc. are being signed for, then proof of individual's
authority to sign for same shall also be submitted.
Attach a color coded map of a scale of not less than I" = 200' of the area
sought for vacation. (NOTE) Map must correspond with legal description.
ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS
SIGNATURES AND ADDRESSES
TAX LOT #
LOT, BLOCK & PT_.AT/SEC. TWN. PC
$150.00 Fee Paid Treasurer's Receipt No
Appraisal Fee Paid Treasurer's Receipt No.
Land Value Paid Treasurer's Receipt Nc.
Deed Accepted Date
Trade Accepted Date _..--.
5224-33A EXHIBIT.",-. 1
220 <Ih AVE. SO.. / KENT. WASHINGTON 96032-5895 1 ENGINEERING (208(859-3383 [OPERATIONS (206)859 3395 1 FAX k 859 333E
402 So. Railroad .-Ave_
Kent. Washington 98032-�935
September 04, 1996
CITY OF KENT
dth & Gowe
Kent, WA 98032
Attw Engineering Dept.
Re: Petition to Vacate
12 Foot Strip Along E. Saar on So. Side
Next to 402 So. Railroad Ave.. Kent WA - 98032
To Whom It May Concern:
I would like to petition the Citv of Kent to vacate the 12 by 120 Foot Strip of Land on the south side of
E. Saar St., from So. Railroad Ave. to the Alley. Reasons listed below
The end of the southeast sidewalk in the 400 Blocck of So. Railroad Ave._ installed by the
City of Kent which we paid for through a L.I-D.. is located at the end of «°here the propert}
line has been since we bought the propemin 1943
2. The street on E. Saar was a dirt road at that time and has since been paved
and already includes the parking strip.
3. ,Mv husband and I have maintained the above -mentioned strip of land for
the past 53 years.
a. 402 So. Railroad Ave _ Kent. now measures fio' by 120'.
Sincereiv.
Mary A. Ho(1ing. Petitioner
mall/mall
enc: Application for Vacation and Petition
Pictures of Propem' Line in Question
Kent City Council Meeting
Date October 1, 1996
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: UTILITY TAX/SUNSET CONCURRENCY - ORDINANCE
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Adoption of Ordinance No. The
utility tax presently sunsets in April of 2002 and the Six Year
Plan goes to the end of 2002. It has been recommended by the
Public Works Committee to adopt an ordinance extending the
Sunset Clause until December 2006, which will allow time to
address all the issues and still remain in concurrency.
3.
4.
EXHIBITS: Public Works memorandum, Public Works minutes and
ordinance
RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
21
7.
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED:
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
econds
Council Agenda
Item No. 3G
PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE
September IS, 1996
PRESENT: Tim Clark Don Wicicstrom
Judy Woods Gary Gill
Connie Epperly Tom Brubaker
Utility Tax Sunset/Concurrency
Wicicstrom stated that the Utility Tax as presently exists under City Ordinance, Sunsets
in April of 2002 and our Six Year Plan expires at the end of 2002. That is one issue,
which is relatively simple. He noted that the bigger issue is, in developing the
Comprehensive Transportation Plan, we looked bevond 2002 past 2010 and, past
2020. Wicicstrom said also that we know we have major needs to be implemented in
order to comply with Concurrence by 2010. He explained there are some segments of
the Corridor projects that could cost S30 - S40 Million dollars and in order to implement
them, they need to be started now. The lead time for those projects is extensive in
establishing the funding and the permit process. As we indicated, there is one in the
2002 program, which is the west leg of the S. 228th Corridor project.
Wicicstrom said the other issue at hand is the railroad crossings. He said we have
nothing but on -grade crossings and there is a projection that freight rail traffic and
passenger train (including commuter rail) traffic will increase significantly. This is
another big "unknown" which needs to be addressed. The idea is to at least extend the
sunset clause until December 2006 which will giye us some time to address all of the
issues. We can still remain in concurrence in terms of transportation, where it is
necessary to have the road capacity available to handle trips generated from ne��
development. For concurrencv, that capacity needs to be there now in order to issue
building permits or, if there is a reasonable financial plan which shows that can be
implemented within 6 years, which is the reason for 2002 issue. Wiccstrom main stated
that if Nye don't have concurrercv we are forced to stop issuing building permits. He said
we have already reduced our service level in terms of transportation of our existing road
system.
Wicicstrom noted that this was presented to the Chamber of Commerce last week at the
City Government Committee and the\, concurred .with amending the Sunset Clause.
Wicicstrom also noted the Chamber Board concurred also at their luncheon meeting
today.
Tim Clark clarified the issue and stated that basically, the Growth Management Act
requires that we stay concurrent with the population growth. One of the elements is
capacity of the transportation system which means capacity on the roads and, if we do
not bring our Capital Improvement Plan up to speed to meet those demands, the City
will be forced to stop issuing building permits. Wickstrom concurred.
Committee unanimously recommended that the Utility Tax Sunset Clause be extended
to December 31, 2006.
Street Vacation - Saar & Railroad Avenue
Wicicstrom said we have received a request for a street vacation and at this time we are
asking the Committee to recommend setting a public hearing date before Council.
When a petition is submitted we are required to act on it within a specified number of
days. Wicicstrom noted that there is however, a house in the right of way which has
been there for sometime. He said this will need to be addressed when it goes before the
Public Hearing.
Committee unanimously recommended adoption of a resolution setting a hearing date
for the Saar/Railroad Ave. Street Vacation.
Meeting adjourned: 4:00 p.m.
DEPART,NIENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
September 4, 1996
TO: Public Works Committee
FROM: Don Wickstrornl�
RE: Utility Tax Sunset/Concurrency
In accordance with the Sunset provision of Ordinance #3274, the 1% utility tax used
to finance the 277th Street Corridor project from Auburn Way North to SR 516 and
the 200th/196th Corridor project from Orillia Road to East Valley Highway is set to
expire on April 7, 2002. While that may be all well and good, it does present a
significant problem. Under Gro«,h Management, the City is required to maintain
transportation concurrenev. As a result of GMA, the City adopted an ordinance that
assures compliance thert%Nith. Concurrency mearis that the City's transportation
system has the capacity based on City adopted service levels, to handle traffic growth
attributed to new developments. Once the capacity is exhausted, no further
development can occur. Additional capacity can only be counted if it's either built or
is financed and able to be put to use within six years. Therein lies the problem of the
utility tax Sunset clause. With it set to expire on April 7, 2002, the City's Six Year
Street Plan (copy attached) is no longer financially balanced. As such, if said Plan _s
adopted as is, the City would technically not be in concurrence and would be forced
to act accordingly. While this one year dilemma could be remedied by extending the
Sunset clause to the end of 2002, the problem is much broader.
When the Street Utility was originally formed, (replaced January 1, 1996 by a 1°io
utility tax) it was the final element needed to fund the earlier described specific
corridor projects. These projects v«ll in fact be completed by the end of 2002.
However, when the City developed its current Comp Plan in compliance with GINLk,
the transportation element therein looked beyond 2000 to 2010. As a result, by
2010 two additional corridor- links are required in order to meet concurrency. Thev
are the west leg of the S. 22Sth Street Corridor (Military Road to 54th Avenue) and,
the east leg of the 196th Street Corridor (East Valley Highway to SR515 [Benson
Highwav]). These projects are estimated to cost 59,000,000 ('S6 dollars) and
S25,000,000 (County'96 estimate) respectively. Since these are large projects and
multi -jurisdictional; in the case of 196th StrCCt east leg, a long Icad time is necessary
for their implementation not to mention developing the necessary funding packages.
As such, programming them early into the City's six vcar plan is necessary. To
further complicate the concurrency dilemma is the planned increase in rail traffic
(freight, commuter, and passenger), which impacts the capacity of our existing
east/west corridors and thus, raises the need for grade separation and the funding
thereof.
The bottom line is, we need time to sort out issues. Financially balancing the year
2002 of the Capital Facility Plan doesn't provide that time. We propose amending
the Sunset clause to extend it to December 31, 2006. This would give time for
development of the funding package for the additional corridors to solidify along Mth
those issues associated with grade separation of the railroad.
Since this issue NAill be brought before the Chamber of Commerce at its Government
Committee meeting on September 1 1 th, I thought it best to introduce it at this
Committee meeting and defer any action thereon until the next Public Works
Committee meeting.
ACTION: Committee concurs ,Nith the Department of Public Works and
recommends that the Utilitv Tax Sunset Clause be extended to
December 3 1, 2006.
CITY OF KENT
STREET FUND
1997 - 2002 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN FORECAST
(Dollars In Thousands)
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002 '
Revenues
Fuel Tax - Unrestricted
933
948
443
964
450
980
458
992
464
1.005
470
Fuel Tax - Arlerlal
436
449
456
464
471
477
464
Motor Vehicle Registration Fee
66
67
83
84
85
22
Water Utility Tax
132
134
136
139
141
36
21
Sewer Utility Tax
69
79
80
82
83
235
Drainage Utility Tax
753
789
826
865
902
47
Electric Utility Tax
149
156
164
171
179
135
Gas Utility Tax
433
454
475
497
519
33
Telephone Utility Tax
105
110
115
121
126
167
Garbage Ulilily Tax
404
166
_166 __
166
166
Interest Income
3,730
3804
3,924
4034
4,134
2,654
Total Revenues
Expenditures
218
221
217
201
198
200
179
Debt Service
Debt Service - 1992 & 1993 Refunding of 1989 GO Bonds
246
448
352
245
362
182
373
183
384
396
Street Utility Operations
341
805
620
824
756
756
774
Total Expenditures
2,925
2.963
3,100
3,27E
3,368
1.879
Not Available for Capital Projects
Sources of Funding
2,925
2.983
3,100
3,278
3,366
1,879
Net Available for Capital Projects
1,D00
---
Sale of Property
3.925
2,983
3, 100
3.278
3.368
1,879
Tot 'aces of Funding (
Capital Project Requests
Corridors
47
1,286
1961h Street West
1,449
1.913
1,771
739
1961h Street Middle 1
930
2,422
4.414
272nd Corridor
441
2281h Street Corridor I
2,426
1,286
4,335
1,771
4,414
1, 180
Total Corridor
Anerials
109
657
West Meeker Widening
-
194
108
72nd Avenue Extension
P23
262
SE 2561h Improvements (i ISih - 132nd)
300
2121h Street Pavement Rehabilitation
P23
756
IOB
109
657
Total Arterials
intersection Improvements
149
Military Road Improvements
/
70
James & Central Right Turn Lane
42nd & Beth Road Pedeshial Signal
55
55
70
149
Total Intersection Improvements
Other Improvements
Canyon Drive Sidewalk 1 Bike Lanes
408
268
350
South Central Pavement Rehabilitation
300
300
36
0
300
300
Sidewalk Rehabilitation
1G0
100
100
100
Bike Paths
337
347
35/
368
379
390
Miscellaneous Asphalt Overlays
60
Kent Shuttle Service
60
60
Slreel Lighting Wiring Upgrades
30
Traffic Signal Operational I Safety Improvements
75
42nd Avenue South Reconstruction
100
and Railroad Separation Study
40
40
20
40
40
.c Signal Controller Cabinet Replacements
- 1 275
1-
757
848
879
1,180
Total Other Improvements
-
3.756
2,609
5,848
2.876
5,402
3,017
Total Street Fund Requests
(831)
374
(2.149)
402
(2,034)
(1,136)
Revenues over (under) Expenditures
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE
223
755
533
669
601
664
Unrestricted
119
416
494
49
257
473
(735)
Restricted
221
3.237
3,756
1,315
1,577
Street Utility
Corridor Improvement Balance Available
3,676
4408
4,7B3
2,034
2,435
402
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE
4 240
ENDING FUND BALANCE
755
533
669
601
664
43a
Unrestricted
416
494
49
257
473
144
Restricted
Street Utility
3,237
3,756
4,783
1,315
2,034
1577
2,435
(735)
402
(736)
Jon
ENDING FUND BALANCE
4,408
' Assumes that the 1 % interim utility taxes will be discontinued
on April 7, 2002
per Ordinance f13274.
7
nc mprrcT, tNn1 ?n. 4un n6
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of
Kent, Washington, amending Chapter 3.18 of the Kent City
Code relating to utility taxes by extending the sunset
provisions of the interim tax assessed for youth teen programs
to provide for continued funding of youth teen programs.
WHEREAS, the City's utility tax assesses an interim tax of three -tenths (0.3)
percent which revenue is dedicated to youth teen programs; and
WHEREAS, the interim tax sunsets December 31, 1996; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that youth teen programs are beneficial to
the citizens of the community and therefore would like to continue the tax for such
programs by extending the date the interim tax sunsets; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES
HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
UTILITY TAX (YOL'TH)
SECTION 1. Section 3.18.020 of the Kent City Code is hereby amended to
read as follows:
Sec. 3.18.020. Certain utilities subject to tax.
A. In addition to the other business and license fees required by the ordinances of
the city, there is hereby levied upon all persons (including the city) engaged in certain
business activities a utilities tax to be collected as follows:
Upon every person engaging in or carrying on any telephone business
within the city, an annual tax equal to three and one-half (3 1/2) percent of
the total gross operating revenues, including revenues from intrastate toll,
derived from the operation of such business within the city. In addition,
there shall also be assessed an interim tax of three -tenths (0.3) percent
effective until 11:39 p.m. on December 31, 1996 which revenue from said
interim tax shall be dedicated to youth teen programs, plus an interim tax of
one (1.0) percent effective until 1 1:59 p.m. on April 7, 2002, or until the
effective date of any new legislation adopted by the Washington State
Legislature during the 1996 legislative session authorizing cities to
implement street utilities, whichever is sooner, which revenue from said
interim tax shall be dedicated to street improvement programs. Gross
operating revenues for this purpose shall not include charges which are
passed on to the subscribers by a telephone company pursuant to tariffs
required by regulatory order to compensate for the cost to the company of
the tax imposed by this chapter.
2. Upon every person engaging in or carrying on a business of selling,
furnishing, distributing, or producing gaseous gas for commercial or
domestic use or purposes, a fee or tax equal to three and one-half (3 1/2)
percent of the total gross income from such business in the city during the
tax year for which the license is required. In addition, there shall also be
assessed an interim tax of three -tenths (0.3) percent effective until 11:59
p.m. on December 31, 1996 which revenue from said interim tax shall be
dedicated to youth teen programs, plus an interim tax of one (1.0) percent
effective until 11:59 p.m. on April T. 2002, or until the effective date of any
new legislation adopted by the Washington State Legislature during the
1996 legislative session authorizing cities to implement street utilities,
whichever is sooner, which revenue from said interim tax shall be dedicated
to street improvement programs.
3. Upon every person engaged in or carrying on the business of selling,
furnishing, or distributing electricity for light and power, a fee or tax equal
to three and one-half (3 1/2) percent of the total gross income from such
business in the city during the tax year for which a license is required. In
addition, there shall also be assessed an interim tax of three -tenths (0.3)
percent effective until 11:59 p.m. on December 31, 1996 which revenue
from said interim tax shall be dedicated to youth teen programs, plus an
interim tax of one (1.0) percent effective until 11:59 p.m. on April 7, 2002,
or until the effective date of any new legislation adopted by the Washington
State Legislature during the 1996 legislative session authorizing cities to
implement street utilities, whichever is sooner, which revenue from said
interim tax shall be dedicated to street improvement programs.
4. Upon every person engaging in or carrying on a business providing garbage
service, a tax equal to six and one-half (6 1/2) percent of the total gross
income from such business in the city during the tax year for which the
license is required. In addition, there shall also be assessed an interim tax of
three -tenths (0.3) percent effective until 1 1:59 p.m. on December 31, 1996
which revenue from said interim tax shall be dedicated to youth teen
programs, plus an interim tax of one (1.0) percent effective until 1 1:59 p.m.
on April 7, 2002, or until the effective date of any new legislation adopted
by the Washington State Legislature during the 1996 legislative session
authorizing cities to implement street utilities, whichever is sooner, which
revenue from said interim tax shall be dedicated to street improvement
programs.
5. Upon every person (including the city) engaging in or carrying on the
business of selling, furnishing or distributing water, sewer or drainage
services, a tax equal to three and one-half (3 1/2) percent of the total gross
income from such business in the city during the tax year. In addition, there
shall also be assessed an interim tax of three -tenths (0.3) percent effective
until 11:59 p.m. on December 31 19962006 which revenue from said
interim tax shall be dedicated to youth teen programs, plus an interim tax of
one (1.0) percent effective until 11:59 p.m. on April 7, 2002, or until the
effective date of any new legislation adopted by the Washington State
Legislature during the 1996 legislative session authorizing cities to
implement street utilities, whichever is sooner, which revenue from said
interim tax shall be dedicated to street improvement programs.
3
B. In computing the tax provided in subsection A., the taxpayer may deduct from
gross income, the following items:
The actual amount of credit losses and uncollectibles sustained by the
taxpayer.
2. Amounts derived from the transactions in interstate and foreign commerce
which the city is prohibited from taxing under the laws and constitution of
the United States.
SECTION 2. If any one or more sections, sub -sections, or sentences of this
Ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance and the same shall remain in full force
and effect.
SECTION 3. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) day.,
from the time of its final approval and passage as provided by law.
JIti-1 WITITE, NIAYOR
ATTEST:
BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ROGER A. LUBOVICH, CITY ATTORNEY
PASSED day of 1996.
APPROVED day of 1996.
PUBLISHED day of 1996.
I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No. passed
by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the
City of Kent as hereon indicated.
UTILTAX.ORD
BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK
5
EA L)
Kent City Council Meeting
Date October 1, 1996
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: JUNK VEHICLES - ORDINANCE
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Adoption of Ordinance No. amending
Chapter 8.08 of the Kent City Code relating to junk vehicles,
as recommended by the Planning Committee.
3. EXHIBITS: Ordinance; Planning Committee minutes of 9/17/96
4. RECOMMENDED BY: Planning Committee
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
to"COWIR
Council Agenda
Item No. 3H
CITY OF
Jim White, Mayor
PLANNING COMMITTEE MINUTES
September 17, 1996
Plannina'Committee I'lembers Present: City Attornev's Office
Leona Orr, Chair Roger Lubovich
Tim Clark Laurie Evezich
Tom Brubaker
Planning St
Fred Satterstrom, Planning Manager
Matt Jackson, GIS Planner
Brian Swanber2, Code Enforcement Officer
Margaret Porter, Administrative Assistant III
Other
Sue Olson
Bob Tidball
Ron Harmon
KENT JUNK ORDINANCE -'(F. Satterstrom)
Planning Manager Fred Satterstrom informed the Committee that according to Police Chief Ed
Crawford there would be "no significant impact to the police department related to towing and
storage fees."
Chair Leona Orr questioned Code Enforcement Officer Brian Swanberg whether he had any
information to add. He stated that there will be an initial period needed to work out the mechanics
of this process.
Tim Clark MOVED to send this item to the City Council meeting of October 1, 1996, under the
consent calendar for final approval of the full council. Chair Orr SECONDED this motion.
(Committee member Jon Johnson was absent from this meeting, however, the Planning Department
contacted him and he concurred with this motion.) Motion carried.
HONME OCCUPATION DEVELOPMENT AND PERFORMANCE STANDARDS - (L. Orr)
Chair Leona Orr explained that this item is a potential Zoning Code amendment to expand the uses
exempt from the home occupation development and performance standards. Chair Orr further
explained that she would like the Committee to send this item to the Land Use and Planning Board
to hear this issue.
Sue Olson, 815 Marian Place, operates a Home Occupation business within the City of Kent. She
explained that her program meets the description of a "preschool" and would like the City to
consider a Zoning Code amendment to exempt preschools from home occupation development and
11I14th AVP_50_ /KFNT_R \till)AITfUA �1n �'.iti ii II I_IiPIIUA'I: i]UoiS>>_, t�ui/F:A.( 5ip�i i-1
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of
Kent, Washington, amending Chapter 8.08 of the Kent City
Code relating to junk vehicles.
WHEREAS, Chapter 8.08 of the Kent City Code provides for the abatement
of junk vehicles; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to amend this code to be consistent with
state law; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES
HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Chapter 8.08 of the Kent City Code entitled "Junk Vehicles" is
hereby amended to read as follows:
CHAPTER 8.08. JUNK VEHICLES
Sec. 8.08.010. Purpose.
The purpose of this chapter is to preserve the character and safety of the city's
neighborhoods by eliminating as nuisances, junk vehicles from private property, and to
provide procedures for the removal of junk vehicles as authorized by RCW 46.55.240.
Sec. 8.08.020. Definitions.
For the purposes of this chapter, the following words shall have the following
meaning:
Director means the director of the department in charge of code enforcement or his
or her designee or any designated alternate who is empowered by ordinance or by the
mayor to enforce this chapter including assigned code enforcement officials.
Junk vehicle means atrya vehicle t` meeting &oat least three of the
following requirements: (RCW 46.55.010(4))
Is three (3) years old or older; arm
2. Is extensively damaged, such damage including, but not limited to any of the
following: aA broken window or windshield or missing wheels, tires, motor
or transmission; ar4
3. Is apparently inoperable; arx4
, b
§4. Has an approximate fair market value equal only to the approximate value of
the scrap in it.
Landowner means an owner of private property, or a person in possession or
control of private property.
Sec. 8.08.030. Public nuisance declared.
All junk vehicles certified as such by a law enforcement officer or code
enforcement officer designated by the director according to RCW 46.55.230 and found on
private property are declared to constitute a public nuisance subject to removal,
impoundment and disposal. It is unlawful for any individual firm, entity or corporation to
allow, cause to allow or place a junk vehicle on any premises.
Sec. 8.08.040. Exemptions.
A. A vehicle or part thereof which is completely enclosed within a building in a
lawful manner where it is not visible from the street or other public or private property; or
B. A vehicle or part thereof which is stored or parked in a lawful manner on private
property in connection with the business of a licensed dismantler or licensed vehicle
dealer and is fenced according to the provisions of RCW 46.80.130.
Sec. 8.08.050. Abatement and removal of junk vehicles on private property.
A. Voluntary correction. Whenever the code enforcement officer determines that a
vehicle is a public nuisance and in violation of this chapter, a reasonable attempt shall be
made to secure voluntary correction from the landowner and the vehicle's registered
owner.
B. Issuance of notice of civil violation. If the code compliance officer does not
obtain voluntary correction of the public nuisance, the officer may issue a.notice of civil
violation to the landowner of record and the vehicle's last registered owner of record in
accordance with the provisions of Kent City Code 1.04.040.
C. Content. For violations of this chapter the notice of civil violation shall contain
the following information:
The name and address of the landowner of record upon whose property the
vehicle is located; att4
2. The name and address of the vehicle's last registered owner of record
provided license or vehicle identification numbers are available; and
3. The vehicle description including: the license plate number and/or the
vehicle identification number; the model year; the make; and the factors
which render the vehicle a public nuisance; an4
4. The street address of a description sufficient for identification of the property
where the vehicle is located; �
5. The required corrective action and a date and time by which the correction
must be completed; aff4
3
6. The date, time and location of a hearing before the hearing examiner on the
question of abatement and removal of the vehicle or part thereof as a public
nuisance which will be at least ten (10) days but no more than forty-five (45)
days from the date the notice is issued;
7. A statement indicating that the hearing will be canceled and no monetary
penalty will be assessed if the required corrective action is completed at
least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the scheduled hearing;
8. A statement indicating that the city may remove, impound and dispose of
the vehicle, and assess all costs and expenses of administration, removing,
impounding and disposing of the vehicle against the landowner or the
registered owner as ordered by the hearing examiner; and
9. A statement that a monetary penalty pursuant to section 1.04.040 E. in an
amount per day for each violation shall be assessed against the landowner
and/or the vehicle's registered owner as specified and ordered by the
hearing examiner in accordance with section 1.04.040.
D. Service of notice. The notice shall be mailed by certified mail, with a five-day
return receipt requested, to the owner of the land as shown on the last equalized
assessment roll and to the last registered and legal owner of record unless the vehicle is in
such condition that identification numbers are not available to determine ownership.
E. Landowner responsibility disclaimer. The landowner may appear in person at the
hearing or present a written statement prior to the hearing, to deny responsibility for the
vehicle's presence on the property. If the hearing examiner determines that the vehicle
was placed on the property without the landowner', consent and that the landowner has
not subsequently acquiesced in its presence, then the costs and expenses of
administration, removing, impounding and disposing of the vehicle shall not be assessed
against the landowner or otherwise attempted to be collected from said landowner.
F. Removal by the city. Pursuant to the hearing examiner's orders, the vehicle or
part thereof may be removed at the request of a law enforcement officer, the city may use
any lawful means to cause the vehicle to be removed from the private property and
disposed of to a licensed motor vehicle wrecker or hulk hauler or scrap processor, with
notice to the Washington State Patrol and the Washington Department of Licensing that
the vehicle has been wrecked.
4
G. Recovery of costs and expenses.
The costs of removal and disposal shall be assessed against the last registered
owner if the identity of the owner can be determined unless the owner
in -.—the transfer of ownership complied with RCW 46.12.101, or against the
landowner of recQrd of the property on which the vehicle is stored, or both.
If both the owner of the vehicle and the pfopefty landowner are assessed the
costs of removal, then liability for the costs shall be their joint and separate
obligation.
2. The costs of administration and of removal and disposal of the vehicle may
be recovered pursuant to Kent City Code 1.04.060 D.
H. Conflict of provisions. The notice and related requirements of this section, Kent
City Code 8.08.050, are intended to supplement those of Kent City Code 1.04.040,
however, should a conflict exist, the provisions of Kent City Code 8.08.050 shall prevail.
Sec. 8.08.060. Violation; penalty.
A. Any violation of any provision of this chapter is a civil violation as provided for
in Kent City Code, Chapter 1.04, for which a monetary penalty may be assessed and
abatement may be required as provided therein.
B. In addition to or as an alternative to any other penalty provided in this
chapter or by law, any person who violates any provision of this chapter
shall be guilty of a misdemeanor pursuant to section 1.01.140 of the Kent
City Code.
Sec. 8.08.070. Rules and procedures.
The applicable department director in charge of enforcement of this chapter may
adopt such rules as may be necessary to effectively implement and administer this chapter.
SECTION 2. If any one or more sections, sub -sections, or sentences of this
Ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or Invalid, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance and the same shall remain in full force
and effect.
SECTION 3. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days
from and after ;<< passage, approval and publication as provided by law.
JIM WHITE, MAYOR
ATTEST:
BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ROGER A. LUBOVICH, CITY ATTORNEY
PASSED day of 1996.
APPROVED day of 1996.
PUBLISHED day of 1996.
I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No. passed by
the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the City
of Kent as hereon indicated.
BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK
(5 EA L)
Kent City Council Meeting
Date October 1, 1996
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: REGIONAL JUSTICE CENTER MITIGATION AGREEMENT
FUNDS - ESTABLISH BUDGET
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Authorization to establish a budget
for $200,000 received from King County related to the Regional
Justice Center Human Services Mitigation agreement, and
approval to expend the funds.
3. EXHIBITS: Planning Committee minutes of 9/17/96
4.
5.
V1
RECOMMENDED BY: Planning Committee
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 3I
City Council Planning Committee Minutes
September 17, 1996
performance standards. Her proposal is to change the section 15.08.040 of the Zoning Code as
indicated below:
Sec 15.08.040. Home Occupations.
B. Home occupations permitted. Home occupations which meet the
requirements of this section are permitted in every zone where a dwelling unit was
lawfully established. The requirements of this section shall not apply to the
following home occupations:
1. Home child care or preschools.
Ms. Olson explained the basic operation of her Kindermusic program. The Kindermusic program
is in place throughout the United States and has been operating successfully for more than twentv
years. She emphasized that a Kindermusic or a piano teacher could not be successful if they are
limited to four students per day.
Committee member Tim Clark MOVED and Chair Orr SECONDED a motion to send this item to
the Land Use and Planning Board for their consideration. (Committee member Jon Johnson was
absent from this meeting: however, the Planning Department contacted him and he concurred with
this motion.) Motion carried.
COUNTYWIDE PLANNING POLICIES/RATIFICATION - (F. Satterstrom)
Planning Manager Fred Satterstrom explained that any change to Countywide Planning Policies
must be ratified by thirty percent (30%) of the jurisdictions in King County that represents
seventy percent (70%) of the population. Mr. Satterstrom further explained that the proposed change
does not directly effect the City of Kent, the change relates to the City of North Bend.
Staff recommended that this item be sent to the City Council on October 1, 1996 for ratification.
Committee member Tim Clark MOVED and Chair Orr SECONDED to send this item to the full
council on October 1, 1996 under the consent calendar for ratification. (Committee member Jon
Johnson was absent from this meeting, however, the Planning Department contacted him and he
concurred with this motion.) Motion carried.
Added items:
HEARING EXAMINER DECISION APPEAL PROCESS - (L. Evezich)
Assistant City Attorney Laurie Evezich explained that there is an inconsistency between the City of
Kent's Hearing Examiner Ordinance and the State law regarding the time permitted for an appeal
of adverse decision.
Ms. Evezich asked for the Committee's permission to bring a proposed ordinance to the next
meeting for consideration. The Committee concurred.
REGIONAL .TUSTICE CENTER MITIGATION AGREEMENT - (iM. Porter)
Administrative Assistant Margaret Porter explained that under the Regional Justice Center
Mitigation Agreement the County agreed to provide the City of Kent, with the amount of 5200,000
City Council Planning Committee Minutes
September 17, 1996
for human services. Ms. Porter requested that the Committee establish a budget of $200,000 per the
Mitigation Agreement and approval to expend these funds in the amount of $200,000, and to forward
this item to the City Council on October 1, 1996, for final approval.
Committee member Tim Clark MOVED to establish a budget in the amount of $200,000 as part of
the Regional Justice Center Mitigation Agreement for human services and approval to expend these
fiords in the amount of $200,000, and forward this item to the Cite Council on October 1, 1996.
Chair Leona Orr SECONDED the motion. Motion carried.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 4:25 p.m.
r
3
Kent City Council Meeting
Date October 1, 1996
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: AMENDMENT TO COUNTYWIDE PLANNING POLICIES -
RATIFICATION - RESOLUTION
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Adoption of Resolution No. ratifying
the Countywide Planning Policies as recommended by the Planning
Committee, and as adopted by King County in Ordinance
No. 12421.
3. EXHIBITS: Resolution; letter from King County
King County Ordinance No. 12421; and Planning
of 9/17/96
4.
5.
99
7.
dated 8/26/96;
Committee minutes
RECOMMENDED BY: Planning Committee
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 3J
City Council Planning Committee Minutes
September 17, 1996
performance standards. Her proposal is to change the section 15.08.040 of the Zoning Code as
indicated below:
Sec 15.08.040. Home Occupations.
B. Home occupations permitted. Home occupations which meet the
requirements of this section are permitted in every zone where a dwelling unit was
lawfully established. The requirements of this section shall not apply to the
following home occupations:
1. Home child care or preschools.
Ms. Olson explained the basic operation of her Kindermusic program. The Kindermusic program
is in place throughout the United States and has been operating successfully for more than twenty
years. She emphasized that a Kindermusic or a piano teacher could not be successful if they are
limited to four students per day.
Committee member Tim Clark MOVED and Chair Orr SECONDED a motion to send this item to
the Land Use and Planning Board for their consideration. (Committee member Jon Johnson was
absent from this meeting; however, the Planning Department contacted him and he concurred with
_ . X .__:__ _ a
COUNTYWIDE PLANNING POLICIESIRATIFICATION - (F. Satterstrom)
Planning Manager Fred Satterstrom explained that any change to Countywide Planning Policies
must be ratified by thirty percent (30%) of the jurisdictions in King County that represents
seventy percent (70%) of the population. Mr. Satterstrom further explained that the proposed change
does not directly effect the City of Kent: the change relates to the City of North Bend.
Staff recommended that this item be sent to the City Council on October 1, 1996 for ratification.
Committee member Tim Clark MOVED and Chair Orr SECONDED to send this item to the full
council on October 1, 1996 under the consent calendar for ratification. (Committee member Jon
Johnson was absent from this meeting, however, the Planning Department contacted him and he
concurred with this motion.) Motion carried.
Added items:
HEAKllNU ENA1V111NEK L�jrrr, VL r►cyt coo - �L. r.vcLi�-ii)
Assistant City Attorney Laurie Evezich explained that there is an inconsistency between the City of
Kent's Hearing Examiner Ordinance and the State law regarding the time permitted for an appeal
of adverse decision.
Ms. Evezich asked for the Committee's permission to bring a proposed ordinance to the next
meeting for consideration. The Committee concurred.
REGIONAL JUSTICE CENTER MITIGATION AGREEMENT - (M. Porter)
Administrative Assistant Margaret Porter explained that under the Regional Justice Center
Mitigation Agreement the County agreed to provide the City of Kent, with the amount of $200,000
King Countv
RECEIVED
qED Q 6 1996
CfTY OF KENT
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Office of the Mayor
SEP 3 1996
DECEIVED
August 26, 1996
The Honorable Jim White
Mayor, City of Kent
220 Fourth Avenue South
Kent, WA 98032-5895
i
Dear Mayor White:� .
J
We are pleased to forward for your consideration and ratification the enclosed amendment to the
King County 2012 Countywide Planning Policies.
The Growth Management Planning Council (GMPQ met on November 15, 1995 and voted to
pass an amendment to the Phase II Countywide Planning Policies, Step 8b of Framework Policy
FW-1 to extend the deadline for resolving North Bend's Joint Planning Area$om December 31,
1995 to December 31, 1996. The King County Council approved and ratified this amendment
on behalf of the population of the unincorporated King County on August 19, 1996. We
apologize for the delay. King County Ordinance No. 12421 is attached to assist you in your
review of this amendment.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Tom Koney, Legislative Analyst to the
King County Council's Growth Management Committee at 296-0330, or Ikuno Masterson of the
Office of Budget and Strategic Planning at 205-0700. Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
(Mane Hague, Chair
King County Council
D�
Chris Vance, Chair
Growth Management, Housing and Environment Committee
� L
Gary L6cke
King County Executive
Enclosures
ID-
Amendment to the Count3-wide Planning Policies as approved by the Growth Management
Planning Council on November 15, 199:5 and adopted by the Metropolitan King County
Council on August 19, 1996:
Add the underlined teat to FRAMEWORK POLICY 1, STEP 8b as folloFvs:
b. The Urban Growth Areas of the following cities which are in dispute ds of May 25.
1994 and illustrated on the attached maps, are now acknowledged as Joint Planning Areas
(See Appendix 1). By December 31, 1995, King County, the cities , citizens and property
owners will have completed a planning process to determine land uses and the Urban
Growth Area for each city, except t the planning process d° adline for North Bend shall
be December 31. 1996. The King County Executive will recommend amendments to the
Urban Growth Area for each city for adoption by the Metropolitan King County Council.
The Urban Growth Area for each city will be amended in a separate Council ordinance.
These amendments are not subject to ratification under this policy.
Redmond (map -I) - 15 acres
Issaquah (map `2) - 100 acres
Renton (map -3) - 238 acres
North Bend (map r4) - 490 acres
Black Diamond (map :E5 titled: Black Diamond Urban Growth Area/Open Space) -
maximum 3,000 acres
Snoqualmie. (map -6 area labeled Joint Planning Area; the time frame for completion of
joint planning shall be that identified in the agreement between City of Snoqualmie, King
County and Snoqualmie Ridge Associates regarding Snoqualmie's future annexation of
property on the Lake Alice Plateau.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
July 29, 1996
introduced By:
CHRISTOPH� VANCE
Proposed No.: 96 — 65
ORDINANCE NO.�� 4 21
AN ORDINANCE adopting an amendment to the Countywide
Planning Policies pursuant to RCW 36.70A.210; ratifying the
amended Countywide Planning Policies for unincorporated
King County; amending Ordinance 10450, Sections 3 and 4,
as amended, and amending K.C.C. 20.10.030 and K.C.C.
20.10.040.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY:
SF TION 1 FINDINGS. The council makes the following findings.
A. The Metropolitan King County Council adopted and ratified the GMPC
recommended King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies 15!25i94j on .August 15,
1994 pursuant to Ordinance 11446.
B. The GMPC met on November 15, 1995 and voted to pass an amendment to the
King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies [5i25r94], page 7, F'\V-1 Step 8b. to
extend the deadline for thcjoint planning process between the county and the City o[North
Bend from December 31, 1995 until December 31, 1996.
(TION 2 Ordinance 10450, Section 3, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.030 are
each hereby amended to read as follows:
A. The Phase II Amendments to the King Countv 2012 - Countywide Planning
Policies attached to Ordinance 11446 are hereby approved and adopted.
B. The Phase 11 Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning
Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment to t-hie Ordinance 1207.
-C- The Phase 11 a m ndm nts to the Kin o m y')012 - Countvwide Planning
P' l irc arc amended as shown by Attachment I to this Ordinance
SSFCTION 3. Ordinance 10450, Section 4, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.040 are
each hereby amended to read as follows:
- 1 -
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
'. 4
12421
Ratification for unincorporated King County. A. Countywide Planning Policies adopted by
Ordinance 10450 for the purposes specified are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of
unincorporated King County.
B. The amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance
10840 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County.
C. The amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance
11061 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County.
D. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide Planning Policies
adopted by Ordinance 11446 are -hereby ratified on behalf of the population of
unincorporated King County.
E. The amendments to the King County -2012 Countywide Planning Policies, as
shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12027, are hereby ratified on behalf of the
population of unincorporated King County.
- 2 -
12421
F The arnen the Kin, County2012 CQuntv`id^ Pfannine Policies. as shown ov
2 Attch Pm 1 to this Ord in nc ar h hL' ' -d o0 'n-half of •h- �=Ul ttion of
3 unmconnrat-d King QQ111FIV,
C�7L
q INTRODUCED AND READ for the first time this a Q day of
5 19
6 PASSED by a vote of A�- to O this _LCZ�ay of
7 199�:
e KING COUNTY COUNCIL
9 KING COT TY, WASHINGTON
����l1 � �� T lY,lii4(,
10 C /
1� rr�
T
12 ATEST: ��
13 kt��
11 Clerk of the Council
i5 APPROVED this �-'' day of_On
gr--19 7 S.
_6
2 �mg County Executive
L
18 Attachments: Attachment 1: Amendment to the King County - 2012 Countywide
19 Planning Policies FW-I, Step gb.
12421
July 26, 1996 Attachment 1
96-655
1 AMENDMENT to the Kina County - 2012 Counfvµ`de Planning Polices [ 2/1 31/9;1
2 Page 7, FW-1, STEP 8b. is hereby amended:
3
4 b. The Urban Growth Areas of the following cities which are in dispute as of May 25.
5 1994 and illustrated on the attached maps, are now acknowledged as Joint Planning Areas
6 (See Appendix 1). By December 31, 1995, King County, the cities , citizens and property
7 owners will have completed a planning process to determine land uses and the Urban
8 Growth Area for each city, except that the planning process deadline for North Bend shall
9 be December 31, 1996. The King County Executive will recommend amendments to the
10 Urban Growth Area for each city for adoption by the Metropolitan King County Council.
11 The Urban Growth Area for each city will be amended in a separate Council ordinance.
12 These amendments are not subject to ratification under this policy.
13 Redmond (map '11) - 15 acres
14 Issaquah (map R2) - 100 acres
15 Renton (map "3) - 238 acres
16 North Bend (map 44) - 480 acres
17 Black Diamond (map 5 titled: Black Diamond Urban Growth Area/Open Space) -
18 maximum 3,000 acres
19 Snoqualmie (map 46 area labeled Joint Planning Area; the time frame for completion of
20 joint planning shall be that identified in the agreement between City of Snoqualmie, King
21 County and Snoqualmie Ridge Associates regarding Snoqualmie's future annexation of
22 property on the Lake .Alice Plateau.)
23 Effect: A motion to extend the timeline for the County and the City of North Bend to
24 complete the -joint planning process until December 31. 1996 was approved by a voice -vote
25 of the GMPC on November 15, 1996. This amendment actualizes that action.
G'%cpp1FW 18b.doc 7129/96 9:27 AM
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION of the City Council of Kent, Washington,
ratifying the Countywide Planning Policies adopted by the
Metropolitan King County Council and pursuant to the Growth
Management Act.
WHEREAS, the Growth Management Act (RCW 36.70A.210) requires the
adoption of Countywide Planning Policies by the legislative authority of King County, and
that said policies are to provide a countywide framework from which local comprehensive
plans are to be developed; and
WHEREAS, King County, the City of Seattle, and the incorporated suburban
cities and towns in King County established a process for the development, adoption, and
ratification of Countywide Planning Policies by an interlocal agreement, which was approved
by the City of Kent, and that said interlocal agreement established the Growth Management
Planning Council (GMPC), a group consisting of elected officials from King County, suburban
cities, and the City of Seattle, who were authorized to develop a set of recommended
countywide planning policies for consideration by the King County Council; and
WHEREAS, the GMPC recommended a set of Countywide Planning Policies to
the King County Council that were adopted pursuant to Ordinance No. 10450 on July 6,
1992, as required by RCW 36.70A.210; and which furthermore were ratified by the Kent City
Council as outlined in the interlocal agreement pursuant to Resolution No. 1326 on
September 15, 1992; and
WHEREAS, King County has adopted and the City of Kent has ratified Phase I
and Phase II of the Countywide Planning Policies; and
WHEREAS, the GMPC met on November 15, 1995, and voted to pass an
amendment to the Phase II Countywide Planning Policies, Step 8b of Framework Policy FW
1 to extend the deadline for resolving North Bend's Joint Planning Area from December 31,
1995, to December 31, 1996; and
WHEREAS, the King County Council approved and ratified this amendment on
behalf of King County on August 19, 1996; and
WHEREAS, the Kent Planning Committee reviewed the amendment to the
Countywide Planning Policies at its meeting on September 17, 1996; and
WHEREAS, the Kent Planning Committee recommended that the City Council
ratify the County's amendment to the Phase II Countywide Planning Policies, Step 8b of
Framework Policy FW-1; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON DOES HEREBY
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City of Kent, acting pursuant to the Interlocal Agreement among
King County, the City of Seattle, and incorporated suburban cities, hereby ratifies proposed
amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies as adopted by the Metropolitan King
County Council pursuant to Ordinance No. 12421 attached hereto as Exhibit A and
incorporated herein by reference.
2
Section 2. The Countywide Planning Policies adopted herein shall be tiled with
the City Clerk and in the office of the Planning Department and made available for public
inspection.
Passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington
this _ of , 1996.
Concurred in by the Mayor of the City of Kent, this _ day of , 1996.
ATTEST:
BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ROGER LUBOVICH, CITY ATTORNEY
3
JIM WHITE, MAYOR
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of Resolution No. ,
passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washin.oton, the _ day of , 1996.
GNIK-96RE5
a
BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK
EA L)
EXHIBIT A
C,HR1ST0PH-Z-R VANCE
July 29, 1996 Introduced BY:
Proposed No.: 9 6- 6 5 5
ORDINANCE NO.]L 4 21
1
2 AN ORDINANCE adopting an amendment to the Countywide
3 Planning Policies pursuant to RCW 36.70A.210; ratifying the
4 amended Countywide Planning Policies for unincorporated
S King County; amending Ordinance 10450, Sections 3 and 4,
K.C.C. 20.10.030 and K.C.C.
6 as amended, and amending
7 20.10.040.
8 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY:
9 5j C'TION L FINDINGS. The council makes the following findings.
10 A. Tne Metropolitan King County Council adopted and ratified the GMPC
2.1 recommended King County 2012 - County -wide Planning Policies [5/25/94] on August 15,
12 1994 pursuant to Ordinance 11446.
3 B. The GMPC met on November 15, 1995 and voted to pass an amendment to the
14 King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies [5/25/941, page 7, FW-1 Step 8b. to
15 extend the deadline for the joint planning process between the county and the City of North
16 Bend from December 31, 1995 until Decemoer 31, 1996.
17 4 � T ION 3 Ordinance 10450, Section 3, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.030 are
is each hereby amended to read as follows:
9 A. The Phase II Amendments to the King Countv 2012 - Countywide Planning
20 Policies attached to Ordinance 11446 are he;e'oy anoroved and adopted.
21 B. The Phase II .Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning
22 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment tot . Ordinance 1202'.
23 C, T PIla5e IT Amendments to the Kina. C'ountv')012 - unty ide Planning
24 policies a atn na d as 5bQ!Am by Attarhm�nt t to this Ordinanc
25 C=C'TiON I Ordinance 10450, Section 4, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.040 are
26 each hereby amended to read as follows:
- 1 -
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
a
10
11
12
13
14
�2421
Ratification for unincorporated King County. A. Countywide Planning Policies adopted by
Ordinance 10450 for the purposes specified are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of
unincorporated King County.
B. The amendments to the Counrywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance
10840 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County.
C. The amendmens to the Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance
11061 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County.
D. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 Counrvwide Planning Policies
adopted by Ordinance 11446 arehereby ratified on behalf of the population of
unincorporated King County.
E. The amendments to the King County -2012 Countywide Planning Policies, as
shown by Attachment 1 to tes Ordinance ')'?, are hereby ratified on behalf of the
population of unincorporated King County.
2 -
1
2
3
4
s
6
7
s
9
10
11
12
13
14
16
17
1B
19
1-2421
E The amenam nts to th Kine C'oanry 2012 C ountvajd^ Plannine Policies as sho n by
Attachm=1 l to thi< Ordinan are h rebv m fied on behalf of the en_oulation of
unincomorated King COU121y,
INTRODUCED AND READ for the first time this CR Q (h day of
19 4?
PASSED by a vote of LL to D this �ay of
19lq(:
KING COUNTY COUNCIL
KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
ATTEST: ( /
kt�� . —�-
Clerk of the Council
APPROVED this 044, day of q19 '1 S.
f97--�—King County Executive
Attachments: Attachment 1: Amendment to the King County - 2012 Countywide
Planning Policies r W-1, Step Sb.
3 -
12421
July26, 1996 Attachment 1
96-655
1A MENDMENI to th Fein f nnnry 1012 Countri�ide Planning PelicPs il?%31/Q51
2 Page 7, FW-I, STEP 8b. is hereby amended:
3 75
4 b. The Urban Growth Areas of the following cities which are in dispute as of May
5 1994 and illustrated on the attached maps, are now acknowledged as Joint Plaru:ing Areas
6 (See Appendix 1). By December 31, 1995, King County, the cities , citizens and properly
7 owners will have completed a planning process to determine land uses and the Urban
s Growth Area for each city" _xc..pt that the jdanninu oroc sG d adl o fQr NQnh B-nd shill
9 b- Dcccmber 31 1996. Tne King County Executive will recommend amendments to the
10 Urban Growth Area for each city for adoption by the Metropolitan King County Council.
i1 The Urban Growth Area for each city will be amended in a separate Council ordinance.
12 These amendments are not subject to ratification under this policy.
13 Redmond (map '�1) - 15 acres
14 Issaquah (map '12) - 100 acres
15 - Renton (map #3) - 238 acres
16 North Bend (map #4) - 480 aces
17 Black Diamond (map 5 titled: Black Diamond Urban Growth .AreJOaen Space) -
is maximum 3,000 acres
19 Snoaualmie (map R6 area labeled Joint Planning Area; the time frame for compietion of
20 joint planning shall be that identified in the agreement between City of Snoaualmie. Kinc
21 County and Snoaualmie Ridge Associates regarding Snoauaimie's future aancxation of
22 property on the Lake Alice Plateau.)
23 Fffect: A motion to extend the timeline for the County and the City of North Bend to
24 complete thejoint planning process until December 31. I996 was approved by a voice -vole
25 of the GMPC on November 15, 1996. This amendment actuaiizes that action.
G:\cpp\FW18b.doc. 729/96 9 27 AM
Amendment to the County -wide Planning Policies as approved by the Growth Management
Planning Council on November 15, 1995 and adopted by the Metropolitan King County
Council on August 19, 1996:
Add the underlined text to FRAMEWORK POLICY 1, STEP 8b as follow:
b. The Urban Growth Areas of the following cities which are in dispute as of May 25,
1994 and illustrated on the attached maps, are now acknowledged as Joint Planning Areas
(See Appendix 1). By December 31, 1995, King County, the cities , citizens and prope ty
owners will have completed a planning process to determine land uses and the Urban
Growth Area for each city, xr nt that the 121=iO2Pmc-.ss d° adline for North Bend shall
be December 31 19 . The King County Executive will recommend amendments to the
Urban Growth Area for each city for adoption by the Metropolitan King County Council.
The Urban Growth Area for each city will be amended in a separate Council ordinance.
These amendments are not subject to ratification under this policy.
Redmond (mar) 4-1) - 15 acres
Issaquah (map #2) - 100 acres
Renton (map #3) - 238 acres
North Bend (map 44) - 480 acres
Black Diamond (map #5 titled: Black Diamond Urban Growth Area./Open Space) -
maximum 3,000 acres
Snoqualmie (map #6 area labeled Joint Planning Area; the time frame for completion of
joint planning shall be that identiiid in the agreement between City of Snoqualmie. King
County and Snoqualmie Ridge Associates regarding Snoqualmie's future annexation o;
property on the Lake Alice Plateau.)
Kent City Council Meeting
Date October 1, 1996
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: LITTLE BEND - BILL OF SALE
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works
Director, authorization to accept the bill of sale for the plat
of Little Bend submitted by Lakeridge Development, Inc. for
continuous operation and maintenance of 1,616 feet of water
main, 1,546 feet of sanitary sewer, 11195 feet of storm sewers,
1,646 feet of street improvements, and release of bonds after
expiration period. This project is located at 118th Avenue
S.E. and S.E. 268th Street.
3. EXHIBITS: Vicinity map
4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Director
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
[IF
a
7.
UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED:
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 3K
m
I
I
i
I06u1 AVE
x
o
SE
1067H AVE SE
m
--�
1O8TH AVE SE
N
C—
m
U
AVE
N
j/7IDJH AVEi101
c �_
�
C
..
-
RVE1110
1,
'
i�i-�
'
1 �,
�I
�j
1C7 -N
r"
1117H CT
Q
111TH RVE^
111TH_AVE
3Atl
HlTlt
J,
E
f
( CT ''•�/
`\ 1I27H AVESE
I(
L
D�1
I
Cl0nJ
113TH AVE `
1 1
j _114TH
RYE 5E
__- /�
Z
—
114TH AVE
rn`114Pa7m
�•
'+�
E.._
N
rnE
/
1l8 AYE
--- E 118TH AVE SE_
(r
`
? 116TH AVE SE
117TH AVE SE �"
�� ti�'iNA AVE
i
117TH Pam`-.
1
N
-;RVE SE
I18^TH RVE
118TH PLv^118TH�ti
R
y
"c'a•
118TH xv ..
P� .,n
�zf
N 11'
-'�
m
tt �1sO
ti N !x
jN II�
�N PL,./ �9ti ���
\ \r_37H CT
r
(
t l9Tn
y
I20TH PL �ti
N�
120TH AVyN �____ �
ti im
.y m ?
�--- � 1215T RYE jm
v
i o
$� 3n8 OZ_T
`/
`• �-'""'�. �u ` � 2\ � o
,�,
H1C
n�f"N1
i122 AVE
1,215T PL'-'
;!5 j�.��
_ 2b •r /rb�
12 Pm L
Nf 122N0 RVE
iN
i
i -- h lrm,++r to
n f
id 15
�',. t 22 PL \)/!
y.
.Z
i
1J ZZ A a
iN j
N!eZ AVE
z 123R0 PYE
o
m y�
-1?3 PL y i' 123 PL
�
( 124TH
AVE
SE
d
`_-_--_-"--
i,.
rn
125TH RYE` 124TH�
4 SE i
/r
'N f{
�Nr--J-�ti-•j J :25TH
RY �i
O im r�
iuNi
� I �
rr J'�/ �r , o
st
2,..--'-
� ti
ndi
Ni \ x
ld H18Z 1
f :
;\•�
�'
.�i i m -.
•
: �':
/ N
l
q
i27TH AVE 5E �"
Y
-->'�;i�( 9�
y
�.
N r127 RVEJ
__ _
i ;
3AH
.: _
128TM AV'E 5 �` �✓
r
_J
-JJA
128TH RYE
3B AN H1821
\\ y'o 128TH P
T L S�
m i .` „�. ] :
ikkC
w
.'i\
ridp
I _ -� "g2 1
'pNZ
129TH
y
NTH 129I TH PL �c, t � '�
AYf�/'Jm�y
N2 .y,6Zt\vi=
N^y \ ''• •L
1 �;
_ `
3S 3nb R16ZI --�. -�.. , /�G1'
/
AVE'� ;
,�^ -`ni uNi
SE 129-
t� yCl l5,
2 m+l'u
H IN of
`• 130 PL�`•3
129TH PLI'
130TH Pt. -�
38 lc
`' N
r�1m V
i
n
ld
�o 131ST �x
im
N;
1N
po
[N
I
VI
f y.• mL j f,
' to
m mim
x
m
;v o132ND P
y
13_4TH
! - AVE SEj_/�y
�
H357H AVE
Er
�-
i'-- 135TH AVE _SE
`n 13S
RVE'
' ,1'm^
SET
x 136
-Ni 3w
j ro
a IS
iV
�w AVE
ld Cf1 J
3ntl SGT
R �'
1' 3S 3Ab
H19CI
rn 3ne fo
o
I
F N� 1381H PL
N�
'3Atl 8,
Nit, 6I
LITTLE
BEND
01
1W
Kent City Council Meeting
Date October 1, 1996
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: S.E. 208TH AGREEMENT WITH KING COUNTY -
AUTHORIZATION
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works
= Committee, authorization for the Mayor to sign the S.E. 208th
Street Improvement Agreement with King County. The Agreement
requires the City to reimburse the County on an amortized basis
upon annexing the area, the cost for improving S.E. 208th
Street from 116th Avenue S.E. to 132nd Avenue S.E. to five
lanes plus sidewalks etc. In conjunction therewith, the County
is required, at their expense, to widen with amenities, S.E.
240th Street from 132nd Avenue S.E. to 139th Avenue S.E.
(Meridian County Club entrance), construct a new fish passable
Soos Creek crossing of S.E. 256th Street westerly of 148th
Avenue S.E., pay half of the cost of replacing the S.E. 256th
Street flume with a fish passible facility and repair the 3rd
Avenue Green River bridge.
3. EXHIBITS: Public Works minutes, Public Works Director
memorandum, vicinity map and agreement
4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 3L
PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE
AUGUST 21, 1996
PRESENT: Tim Clark Don Wickstrom
Judy Woods Gary Gill
Connie Epperly Ed White
Tom Brubaker
LID #330 Segregation - Assessment 45
Wickstrom explained that this property has been sold, they have adjusted the lot lines and the
assessment will be adjusted to correspond with the new lot lines. He said the segregated parcels will
be paying their share of the LID assessment.
Committee unanimously recommended adoption of a resolution for the segregation of Assessment
95 in LID #330.
LID 4336 Segregation - Assessment T50
Wickstrom explained that this is also a property sale with lot line adjustments. The assessments will
be adjusted to correspond with the new lot lines. Each segregated parcel will be paying their share
of the LID assessment.
Committee unanimously recommended adoption of a resolution for the segregation of Assessment
450 in LID 4336.
S. 208th Street Improvement King County/Kent Agreement
Wickstrom stated that King County is not making capacity type road improvements within the urban
area. Their new policy states that to do so, an Agreement must be signed with the potential annexing
city agreeing to reimburse them (the County) for their cost upon annexation (a mortgage type
reimbursement). The reimbursement would be via a 20 year period or, whatever is left from that 20
year period at the time of annexation. Wickstrom explained that this road improvement is along S.
208th from 116th Avenue S.E. to 132nd Avenue S.E., with some work being done to the east of that.
The County is apparently ready to go with this and is asking Kent to execute an Agreement.
Wickstrom explained that the total project cost is $9,000,000-1 they have budgeted about $2,000,000-1
they have a $2,000,000 grant and as with our S.E. 240th St. agreement, we said we will not pay for
any past costs and we want reimbursement for any grant money. Wickstrom said our cost would be
$5,000,000 were we to annex the area today. Wickstrom said that part of the agreement includes
improving a portion of S.E. 240th between 132nd and 138th, which is the entrance to the Meridian
S-
Valley Country Club, which they don't have budgeted until several years in the future. He said we
have an annexation petition circulating in that area now and that was one of the roads that the
Country Club residents wanted included in the project. He said the County will move up the funds
and include that in conjunction with the rest of the S.E. 240th, which we have already participated
in by an Agreement. Wickstrom noted that the February storms took out S.E. 256th in the vicinity
of 148th Ave S.E. and the County has now restored the road however, the box culvert at the bridge
is not fish passable or a fish bearing type facility. The State Fisheries have required the County to
restore it and install a new box to handle the flows and have the fish passable. Wickstrom said that
if the Meridian Valley annexation is successful, that would then become our cost. The County said
they will budget that portion and do it in 1996.
Wickstrom said there is a flume along the south side of S.E. 256th (half in the County, half in the
City) now running from the existing Big Soos Creek crossing of S.E.256th, west and intercepts the
creek thru the Country Club. He said that Fisheries have been after the County to restore that into
a more natural fish habitat. The County has agreed to pay 50% of that; Kent would be the lead
agency. Wickstrom said that the lastly, the County would do the repairs of the 3rd Avenue bridge,
across the Green River, (their proposal was to close the bridge). Right now we need all our bridges
open for traffic flow especially in the winter when some of those are flooded. The County originally
wanted us to share in the cost of repairing the bridge to meet the present loading criteria. The cost
is $575,000 which the County will now pay and will bring it up to acceptable load standards.
Wickstrom stated that with all those extras, we feel this is a good deal for us; we are still talking
about a $5,000,000 issue however, it is effective over a 20 year period and we only have to pay the
balance of what's outstanding of that 20 year period when we annex the area. Wickstrom noted that
we included a clause in the Agreement stating that period of time starts in July of 1997, should the
County not act fast enough and continue their road work for a long period of time. He noted that
effectively, the mortgage payment plan will start in '97 and if Kent didn't annex until 2000 or 2005,
we would only pay the balance at that point. Wickstrom said we need the road; it's in our annexation
and is something we would have to do and, based on all that the County is willing to add, this is a
good deal for us.
In response to Clark, Wickstrom clarified that this particular road section is from 116th Ave. S.E.
to 132nd Ave. S.E. Clark mentioned that there was significant stream damage along S.E. 256th
below the Soos Creek Trail and there was a flume running along the edge of the road on the south
side. Wickstrom said that's the flume the County wants to share 50/50 cost on, putting that into a
stream for fish passage and they will pay 100% of the cost of rebuilding the bridge. The County will
replace that with a box culvert which is fish compatible as well as flow capacity compatible. This will
be done in '96.
Wickstrom said there is no cost to us now. The only costs we will incur is when we annex S. 208th
and the fronting property on S.208th along this project. We have to share 50/50 in the flume project.
Committee unanimously recommended authorizing the Mayor to sign the King County/City S. 208th
Street Agreement subject to the Public Works Director and the City Attorney concurring on the final
language therein.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
August 21, 1996
TO: Public Works Committee
FROM: Don Wickstrom6 W
RE: S. 208th Street Improvement
King County/Kent Agreement
I believe I may have discussed this preliminarily with the Committee some time back.
As you are aware, the County is not malting capacity road improvements within the
designated urban areas unless a reimbursement agreement is executed with the
annexing city. The County has asked for such an agreement for their improvement of
S. 208th St. from 1 16th Ave S.E. to 132nd Ave S.E. They plan to widen the present
two lane road to 5 lanes with curb and gutter, bike lanes and sidewalk. Our cost per
the agreement, were we to annex the area today, would be $5,319,000. Like our S.
240th St. agreement, this is the net cost. The County gets. no reimbursement for any
grant funds ($2,000,000) or monies they have spent or budgeted todate
(S2,006,754). Further, the improvement costs of S. 208th St. easterly of 132nd Ave.
S.E. (although minor) are at their expense.
Our first response to the County's request was that we are not interested. They then
came back and after some negotiations, offered:
A) To accelerate the funding of the 3 lane portion of S.E. 240th St. from
132nd Ave S.E. easterly to 138th Ave. S.E. (this project is within the
Meridian Vallev Annexation area) and incorporate said improvement
into our S.E. 240th St. project (S569,000).
B) Fund and construct this year, the replacement of the existing S.E.256th
St. stream crossing west of 148th Ave. S.E. with a fish bearing crossing
(S 160,000). (This project is also within the Meridian Valley
Annexation area.) Further, share on the cost is a 50%-50% basis with us
the replacement of the existing flume and,
C) Fund and repair the Alvord "T" bridge (Green River bridge at 3rd Ave.
South) to ensure its safe operation at its current load rating. ($575,000)
With the above incentives, with an active Meridian Valley annexation in the works
and knowing that a S. 208th St. annexation is not in the foreseeable near future, plus
the fact that road work is needed, the Public Works Department is recommending
authorizing executing this agreement subject however to the Public Works Director
and City Attomev concurring on the final language therein.
ACTION: Authorize the Mayor to sign the King County/City S. 208th Street
Agreement subject to the Public Works Director and the City Attorney
concurring on the final language therein.
M860.96
AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
BETWEEN KING COUNTY AND THE CITY OF KENT
RELATING TO THE SOUTHEAST 208TH STREET
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
This Agreement is hereby made and entered into between King County, a home rule
charter county, a political subdivision of the State of Washington (hereinafter called the
"County"), and the City of Kent, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington
(hereinafter called the "City").
WHEREAS, the Countywide Planning Policies, adopted and approved by the
Metropolitan King County Council and ratified by cities within the County, include
policies calling for collaboration between the County and the cities that have designated
potential annexation areas within the Urban Growth Area, established pursuant to the
Growth Management Act, in order to provide urban services and facilities within the
potential annexation areas; and
WHEREAS, King County has responded to the rapid erosion of the County Road Fund's
tax base resulting from annexations and incorporations by adopting a policy that allows
the King County Department of Transportation, Road Services Division, to continue to
design and construct safety and operational improvements within potential annexation
areas without financial participation by the affected city, but requires a cost -sharing
agreement with the affected city prior to awarding a construction contract on major
growth -oriented roadway capacity improvements; and
WHEREAS, the City and County both desire the timely completion of the County's
Southeast 208th Street roadway capacity project, which lies within the City's potential
annexation area; and
WHEREAS, the County has recently completed a study on the Alvord "T" bridge,
located within the City's potential annexation area, and the County recommends that
closure of the bridge be given serious consideration following completion of the
Southeast 277th Street corridor improvements (Phase 1) planned by the City of Kent; and
WHEREAS, the City intends to annex the area including the Alvord "T" bridge and has
requested that the bridge be kept in operation until such time that the City can pursue a
bridge replacement project; and
WHEREAS, the County has identified certain roadway improvements and repairs in the
City's potential annexation area to the east and north of the recent Meridian Annexation,
which are currently programmed for the 1997-2001 period, but which could be
accelerated if additional appropriation authority is provided by the King County Council;
G V'1o1m%208thih.doc
SE 208th Street Interlocal Agreement
Page 2
NOW THEREFORE, pursuant to RCW 39.34, the County and City hereby agree
1. PURPOSE. The purpose of this Agreement is to delineate the respective roles of the
City and County in completing the design and construction of a major road widening
project on Southeast 208th Street; and to clarify financial responsibilities for repairs to
the Alvord "T" bridge, an improvement to Southeast 240th Street, and repairs to the
roadway drainage system near Southeast 256th Street, west of 148th Avenue Southeast.
The Southeast 208th Street project is programmed in the County Road CIP as Project No.
400186 and consists of widening the existing two-lane road between 116th Avenue
Southeast and 132nd Avenue Southeast to a five -lane facility with four through lanes, a
continuous center turn lane, five-foot bike lanes, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, illumination,
signalization at 124th Avenue Southeast and at 132nd Avenue Southeast,
retention/detention and water quality facilities and landscaping (hereinafter called the
"Project"). The Project includes a short segment easterly of 132nd Avenue SE that will
remain a two-lane road.
2. PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND COORDINATION. The County will be the
lead agency for the completion of design, Right -of -Way (hereinafter called "ROW ')
acquisition and construction of the Project. Prior to finalizing the plans and
specifications for the Project, the County will allow, the City's Public Works Department
to review the plans and specifications for potential cost savings that might result from
substituting City road design standards for County standards. The County Road Engineer
will determine whether to substitute City standards, as proposed by the City's Public
Works Director.
3. COST -SHARING. Prior to the effective date of the County's capacity project cost -
sharing policy (January 1, 1996), the County has appropriated a total of 52,006,754 for
CIP Project No. 400186 (the "Existing Appropriations"). These funds will be expended
by the County on activities related to completing the Project, without any reimbursement
from the City.
3.1 Additional Appropriation. An estimated 57,319,000 additional appropriation is
needed to complete ROW acquisition and construction of the Project. The County has
acquired a Transportation Improvement Account (TIA) grant for CIP Project No. 400186.
About $2,000,000 in TIA funds are expected to be available as revenue for the additional
appropriation, leaving S5,319,000 to be covered by local revenues.
3.2 City's Liabilities Upon Annexation. The City agrees to reimburse the County for
the undepreciated value of the County's investment in the Project (net of Existing
Appropriations, the costs associated with the two-lane section easterly of 132nd Avenue.
G.\juhn\208ihila
SE 205th Street Interlocal ngrecment
Page 3
and actual grants) at whatever point in the future the City annexes territory surrounding
the Project. This reimbursement will be made as follows:
3.2.1 Annuity Established. Within thirty (30) days of completing construction of the
Project , the County will establish and transmit to the City an annuity to depreciate the
value of the County's investment over an assumed 20-year useful life of the Project, with
a nominal annual interest rate of 4%. "Annuity Year shall mean a 12 month period. If
construction of the Project is completed prior to July 1, 1997, Annuity Year 1 shall
commence on the first day of the first month following completion of construction of the
Project, as certified to the City by the County Road Engineer. If construction of the
Project is not completed by July 1, 1997, then Annuity Year 1 shall commence on July 1,
1997. Each succeeding Annuity Year shall commence on the anniversary of the
commencement of Annuity Year 1. The initial value to be depreciated will be the total
Project expenditures made by the County, less those fiords appropriated prior to 1996,
less the costs associated with the two-lane segment easterly of 132nd Avenue, and less
any federal or state grant funding received by the County for the Project. [Attached is an
illustrative estimated annuity schedule for the Project.]
3.2.2 Payment Options. Upon annexation of the surrounding territory, the City will
have the option of making annual payments, pursuant to the annuity schedule, of the
undepreciated value of the Project, or to make a lump sum payment. The City's
obligation for making annual payments or a lump sum shall begin in the month of the
Annuity Year in which the annexation takes effect. If the City elects to make annual
payments, the City shall pay all moneys due for the remaining months of that Annuity
Year, and for all remaining Annuity Years when due (see Section 3.2.3). If the City
elects the lump sum option, the City lump sum will be adjusted, as necessary, for a partial
Annuity Year based upon the effective date of the annexation. If the annexation takes
effect before the Project construction is complete, the Citv's obligation begins in the first
month of Annuity Year 1.
3.2.3 Payment Schedule. Within thirty (30) days of the effective date of a future
annexation by the City of the territory surrounding the Project, the City will notify the
County which payment option it chooses. Within thirty (30) days of receipt of this
notice, the County will transmit to the City an invoice and payment schedule. The City
will make payment within thirty (30) days of receipt of the invoice.
3.2.4 Partial Annexation. If a future annexation by the City includes a portion -- but
not all -- of the territory surrounding the Project, the City will be obligated only for a pro
rata allocation of the Project annuity. This pro rasa allocation will be based on the portion
of the total lineal feet of the Project that is included in the annexation area.
G.\juhnl'_OBihila
SE 208th Street Interlocal Agreement
Page 4
3.3 Mitigation Fees. The City shall not impose mitigation fees for this project on
developments in unincorporated King County unless a reciprocal impact fee agreement
with the County is executed and implemented.
4. SOUTHEAST 240TH STREET IMPROVEMENT. The County agrees to
accelerate construction funding for the three -lane portion of the Southeast 240th Street
improvement (between 132nd Avenue and 138th Avenue Southeast) from the year 2001
to 1996, so that this segment will be constructed at the same time as the five -lane segment
which is the subject of a May 1996 interlocal agreement between the City and the County
(estimated cost: $569,000).
5. SOUTHEAST 256TH STREET DRAINAGE REPAIRS. The County agrees to
include in a 1996 mid -year supplemental appropriation for the Roads CIP sufficient funds
to replace existing enclosed drainage system at Southeast 256th Street, west of 148th
Avenue Southeast with a fish passable box culvert (estimated cost of $160,000). The
County shall make all reasonable efforts to complete construction of this project as soon
as practicable. If construction is not completed at the time the project site is annexed to
the City, the County agrees to complete construction as expeditiously as possible at
County cost. In addition, the City agrees to be the lead agency for replacing the existing
flume in this location with a fish passable stream channel. The City and County agree to
share in the cost of the flume replacement on a 50%/50% basis. The City, as lead agency,
will prepare monthly progress billings and submit them to the County, which shall make
payment within 30 days of receipt of the billing.
6. ALVORD "T" BRIDGE. The County agrees to include funds in the 1997-2002
Roads CIP to make repairs to the Alvord "T" bridge that are necessary to ensure the safe
operation of the bridge at its current load rating for a five-year period (1997 2001).
Following adoption of the County's 1997 Roads CIP appropriations, the County shall
make the necessary repairs as soon as practicable. If the repairs are not completed at the
time the Alvord "T" Bridge is annexed to the City, the County agrees to complete the
repairs as expeditiously as possible at County cost. The bridge is currently load -rated for
one truck at a time, with a limit of 20 tons for a three -axle (Truck Type 3), 30 tons for a
five -axle (Truck Type 3S2), and 40 tons for a six -axle (Truck Type 3-3). At any time
following the five-year period, if the bridge remains under County jurisdiction, the
County may decide to close the bridge permanently to vehicular traffic. If the County so
decides to close the bridge permanently, the County will provide the City with six months
advance notice prior to initiating formal bridge closure procedures pursuant to the State
Environmental Policy Act and other pertinent statutes, in order to allow the City to
determine whether it desires to assume financial responsibility for maintaining, repairing
and/or replacing the bridge. This assumption of financial responsibility may take the
form of a completed annexation of the bridge or an interlocal agreement accepting the
G Ajohn12031hila
SE 208th Strect lnterlocal ,Agrccmcnt
Page 5
responsibility for the bridge. If the City takes either of these actions prior to the end of
the six month notice period, the County will not initiate formal bridge closure procedures.
7. RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING LAWS AND STATUTES. This Agreement is
in no way intended to modify or supersede existing laws and statutes and shall be
construed in a manner which is consistent therewith. In meeting the commitments
encompassed in this Agreement, all parties will comply with the requirements of the
annexation statutes, Open Meetings Act, State Environmental Policy Act, Growth
Management Act, the King County Countywide Planning Policies, the King County
Comprehensive Plan and any other applicable laws and regulations.
8. POTENTIAL POLICY CHANGE. If the County's annexation policy regarding
major roadway capacity improvements is amended in a manner that is more favorable to
cities in King County with respect to requiring cost -sharing agreements for such projects,
then the parties shall reopen negotiations with respect to the cost -sharing provisions of
this Agreement. Additionally, if the County's road capacity improvement annexation
policy is repealed or so substantially altered that its effect is essentially void, then the
portions of this Agreement requiring City payments in the event of future annexations
shall also be void.
9. ADMINISTRATION
9.1 Project Team. The provisions of this Agreement will be managed by a Project
Team composed of the King County Executive or designee and the Mayor of Kent or
designee, with additional staff to be determined by each parry.
9.2 Administrative Procedures. The Project Team will meet as necessary to ensure that
the provisions of this Agreement are fulfilled and will develop written procedures and
records as required to accomplish the work of this Agreement.
9.3 Conflict Resolution. The Project Team will use consensus to reach agreements. In
the event consensus cannot be reached on an issue, the parties will first seek the
assistance of a neutral mediator, selected jointly. If the issue still cannot be resolved, the
issue will be forwarded to the legislative authorities of the City and County for resolution.
10. VENUE AND APPLICABLE LAW. In the event that either party deems it
necessary to institute legal action or proceedings to enforce any right or obligation under
this Agreement, the parties hereto agree that any such action shall be initiated in the King
County Superior Court of the State of Washington. The parties hereto agree that all
questions shall be resolved by application of Washington law and that the parties to such
G:yohn12080111a
SE 208th Street Interlocal Agrcement
Page 6
action shall have the right of appeal from such decisions of the King County Superior
Court in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington.
11. TERMINATION. This Agreement is effective upon approval by the governing
bodies of the City and County and upon signature of the parties. The Agreement shall
continue to be in effect from year to year unless terminated upon written agreement by
both parties.
12. AUDITS AND INSPECTIONS. The records and documents with respect to all
matters covered by this Agreement shall be subject to inspection, review or audit by the
County or the City during the terms of this Agreement and three (3) years after
termination.
13. NON -WAIVER OF BREACH. The failure of either party to insist upon strict
performance of any of the covenants and agreements contained herein, or to exercise any
option herein conferred in one or more instances shall not be construed to be a waiver or
relinquishment of those covenants, agreements or options. and the same shall be and
remain in full force and effect.
14. MODIFICATION. No waiver, alteration, or modification of any of the provisions
of this agreement shall be binding unless in writing and signed by a duly authorized
representative of the City and the County.
15. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This written agreement supersedes all prior verbal
statements of any officer or other representative of the City and the County, and those
statements shall not be effective or be construed as entering into or forming a part of or
altering in any manner this agreement. The entire agreement between the parties with
respect to the subject matter hereunder is contained in this Agreement.
16. INVALID PROVISIONS. If any provision of this Agreement shall be held invalid,
the remainder of the Agreement shall not be affected hereby if such remainder would then
continue to serve the purposes and objectives of the parties.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date
last written below.
KING COUNTY CITY OF KENT
its
c:Fjohn\208 this ,
its
SE 208th Street Interlocal Agreement
Page 7
Date: Date:
Attest:
Approved as to form: Approved as to form:
By By
Deputy Prosecuting Attorney Kent City Attorney
Ci.\julm\2031hila
SE 208th Str-;t Project
Concept. Kin; Countv assumes responsibility for "payment" until annexation;
Kent assumes responsibility for "payment" or "Project Balance" upon annexation.
Total 5,3 19,000
Inputed Interest 1.00/0
Term of"Pavback" 20
Annuity Year
"Payment"
"interest"
Project Balance
Year 1
S
391,381
212,760
5,140,319
Year 2
S
391,331
205,615
4,954,612
Year'
S
391,381
198,184
1,io1,416
Year 4
S
391,381
190,457
4,560,491
Year 5
S
391,381
182,420
4,351,529
Year
S
391,381
174,C51
-,i3-�,-- 09
Year 7
S
391,381
165,368
3,903,196
Year 8
S
391,331
1 6,32S
,
3,673,1-3
Year 9
S
391,381
146,926
3,?23,58
Year 10
S
391,381
137,147
3,17',4r
Year 11
S
391,381
126,978
2,910.050
Year 12
S
391,391
116,402
2,635,07i
Year 13
S
391,381
105,403
2,349,092
Year 14
S
391,381
93.964
2,051,67-'
Year 15
S
391,381
32.067
1,7-2,--- 50
Year 16
S
391,381
69,694
I,420,573
Year 17
S
391,381
56,S27
1,036,119
Year IS
S
391,381
43.445
73S.132
Year 19
S
391,381
29,527
376.32E
Year20
S
391,3St
I5,053
0
1. Annuity Year 1 commences on the first day of the first month Collowing completion of
construction of the project and extends for 12 months.
2. Annuity Year is the t%yelye month period beginning on the anniversary of Year 1.
3. Amount adjusted to reflect S2,000.000 grant.
DRAFT
W S WI
W W l
Cn
L
H t>ouw
W ~
if ti r
57
—
LI
Clfi
N
AAH A3��b'n 15�3 ii I Cr
` vt as
i r I
A ..1("f, kz 107A
rr
II
S. 208th Street Agreement
--
Vicinity Map
Kent City Council Meeting
Date October 1, 1996
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: CORRECTIONS FACILITY FOOD SERVICE CONTRACT -
EXTENSION
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Authorization to extend the Food Service
Contract at the Kent Corrections Facility. Consolidated Food
Management, Inc. has been providing food service at the Kent
Corrections Facility since approximately 1990. The contract
with them will expire on December 31, 1996, and they have
requested extension of the contract for an additional year.
We have been very pleased with the service provided by
Consolidated Food Management and recommend extension of the
contract through December 1997.
3. EXHIBITS: Letter of request for extension
4. RECOMMENDED BY: Staff and Public Safety 9/17/96 (2-0)
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS: already budgeted in the General Fund
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 3M
KENT CORRECTIONS FACILITY
Auaust 27, 1996
TO: CHIEF CRAWFORD
FROM: CAPT. C.E. MILLER
SUBJECT: FOOD SERVICE CONTRACT
The attached letter is a request from Consolidated rood Management
to continue their service for our facility per section 11.01 of the
contract. I am very pleased with the services provided and we have
not had any problems, therefore, I recommend to extend their
contract for 1997.
If you agree, please sign your approval of their letter and forward
to the Public Safety Committee for final approval.
Thank you.
Consolidated Food
Management, Inc.
2448 - 76th Ave. S.E., Stuite 203 • Mercer Island, WA 98040 • (206), 232-9771
August 16, 1996
Captain Chuck Miller
City of Kent Police Department
220 Fourth Avenue South
Kent, WA 98032
Dear Captain Miller:
On December 31, 1996, our food service agreement with the City of Kent Jail will expire.
Consolidated Food Management, Inc. would appreciate the opportunity to continue our
service to the City of Kent.
Pursuant to the option of renewal, as outlined in section 11.01 of our agreement,
Consolidated Food Management, Inc. requests that our contract with the City of Kent be
continued for an additional vear.
We have enjoyed working with your department. We appreciate the cooperation and
support you and your people have given us over the past years, and sincerely hope we
can continue to serve the Cit-v of Kent for years to come.
Sincerely,
CONSOLIDATED FOOD MANAGEMENT, INC.
4olas
Vice President, Corrections
Kent City Council Meeting
Date October 1, 1996
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: CONTRACT WITH CITY OF FEDERAL WAY FOR HOUSING OF
INMATES - APPROVAL
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Authorization for the Mayor to sign a
contract with the City of Federal Way for housing a guaranteed
minimum of 20 inmates at the Kent Corrections Facility. This
contract was negotiated in an attempt to replace revenues lost
by the opening of the U.S. Marshals' own facility. Revenue
anticipated through this contract will be approximately
$425,000.
3.
4.
5
7.
EXHIBITS: Contract
RECOMMENDED BY: Staff and Public Safety on 9/17/96 (2-0)
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
econds
Council Agenda
Item No. 3N
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF KENT AND THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
In accordance with the Interlocal Cooperation Act (RCW Chapter 39.34), the City
of Kent, Washington, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, hereinafter
referred to as " Kent'', and the City of Federal Way, a municipal corporation of the State of
Washington, hereinafter referred to as "Federal Way", hereby enter into this agreement as
follows:
WHEREAS, the parties maintain Police Departments for the benefit and safety of the
citizens of their respective jurisdictions.
WHEREAS, Kent maintains a Corrections Facility located at 1230 Central Avenue
South, Kent, Washington which is primarily designed, staffed and used for the housing of
adults charged with a criminal offense, for the punishment and correction of offenders
after conviction of a criminal offense, and for the confinement and/or holding during a
criminal investigation of a civil detention to enforce a court order; and
WHEREAS, the Interlocal Cooperation Act, as amended, and codified in Chapter
39.34 of the Revised Code of Washington, provides for interlocal cooperation between
governmental agencies; and
WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire, and by this agreement, enter into an Interlocal
Cooperative Agreement ("Agreement")•wherein Federal Way can utilize Kent's facility;
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the procedures contained herein
performed and to be performed, the parties hereto agree as follows:
I. IAIL AND HEALTH SERVICES
A. Kent shall accept for confinement and/or holding in the Kent Corrections
Facility (hereinafter "Facility") those persons who are prisoners and shall furnish Federal
Way with the Facility, booking, custodial services, and personnel for the confinement of
Federal Way's prisoners at least equal to those provided by Kent for the confinement of its
own prisoners. For purposes of this agreement, "Prisoner" means a person held when a
charge of Federal Way is the principal basis for confining that person (e.g., the person is
confined by reason of an ordinance violation - pre-trial or post -trial). It includes, but is not
limited to, (a) a prisoner arrested by and booked on behalf of a police officer of Federal
Way by reason of an ''open charge" or investigation of a felony; or a prisoner detained for
Federal Way after a City of Kent "hold" has been relea>ed; (b) it includes an individual
arrested by a police officer of Federal Way and booked and housed in the Facility.
B. Included in its services, Kent shall provide basic medical care, as defined by
Washington State Custodial Care Standards (W.A.C. #289-20) except hospitalization,
prescriptions, surgical and dental care for which Federal Way agrees to assume all cost
and responsibility. Kent shall furnish to Federal Way all Facility medical and health care
services required to be provided pursuant to Federal or State law and regulations
promulgated thereto. If a prisoner needs medical care outside of the Facility, Kent agrees
to contact Federal Way before providing for such care. The cost of outside medical care
will be charged to Federal Way.
C. Kent guarantees to Federal Way for the eventual confinement and/or holding
of up to twenty (20) persons booked and held by the Facility as follows: Effective
October 15, 1996, the use of eight (8) beds will be guaranteed until the agreement Kent
has with the United States Marshall expires in approximately January of 1997. At that
time, the number of guaranteed beds allotted to Federal Way will increase to twenty (20).
Additional beds will be subject to available space and facilities as may be determined
solely by Kent. It is acknowledged and agreed that access to additional beds at the Facility
is on a non-exclusive space available basis and further that Kent is contracting with and
retains the right to contract with other cities for similar access to the Facility during the
term of this contract.
II. COMPENSATION
A. Federal Way agrees to pay to Kent the sum of $58.00 per day for each
guaranteed bed regardless of whether they are all utilized. Prior to October 15, 1996,
Federal Way will be charged $58.00 per day for each bed used. Payment of housing costs
will be made promptly and to Kent within thirty (30) days after the monthly statement is
received. Federal Way shall also pay Kent an additional sum of $58.00 per day, or any
portion thereof, for any bed occupied over the guaranteed beds allotted under this
agreement. For the purposes of determining this additional sum, a day shall mean a 24
hour period commencing at midnight. If any of Federal Way's prisoners, over the
guaranteed minimum, are being held for other jurisdictions as well, then the cost to house
them will be shared equally.
B. Each party may examine the other's books and records to verify charges. If
an examination reveals an improper charge, the amount shall he applied on the next
month's and subsequent month's statements until the credit has been exhausted.
Provided, however, that any unused credit which exists at the time of the termination of
this agreement shall be refunded within twenty (20) days of termination.
C. Kent agrees to notify Federal Way of any rate increase prior to September
first of any year this agreement is in effect.
III. TERM
This agreement shall take effect September 1, 1996 and shall supersede and
terminate any other Facility use agreement or contract existing between Kent and Federal
Way. This agreement shall be in effect through 1997 and then automatically renew from
year to year unless otherwise modified or terminated as provided herein. This agreement
may be terminated by either party upon ninety (90) days written notice to the other party.
Page 2
If Federal Way requires additional time to relocate prisoners, then Kent may extend the
termination notice period only for a period of time mutually agreeable to the parties.
IV. MODIFICATION
This agreement shall be modified only upon mutual consent of the parties, in
writing, signed by both parties.
VI. INDEMNIFICATION
A. Federal Way agrees to indemnify and hold Kent, its elected officials,
commissioners, officers, employees, agents and volunteers harmless from any and all
claims, demands, losses, actions and liabilities (including costs and attorney fees) to or by
any and all persons or entities, including without limitation, their respective agents,
licensees, or representatives, arising, in whole or in part, from the performance of this
agreement to the extent caused by the negligent acts, errors, or omissions of Federal Way,
its employees or agents.
B. Kent agrees to indemnify and hold Federal Way, its elected officials, officers,
employees, agents, and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, demands, losses,
actions and liabilities (including costs and all attorney fees) to or by any and all persons or
entities, including, without limitation, their respective agents, licensees, or representatives,
arising, in whole or in part, from the performance of this agreement to the extent caused
by the negligent acts, errors or omissions of Kent, its employees or agents.
VII. WAIVER
No waiver of any right under this contract shall be effective unless made in writing
by the authorized representative of the party to be bound thereby. Failure to insist upon
full performance on any one or several occasions does not constitute consent to or waiver
of any later nonperformance, nor does payment of a billing or continued performance
after notice of a deficiency in performance constitute an acquiescence thereto.
Vill. INSURANCE
A. Federal Way shall obtain and maintain general liability insurance with limits
of one million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence, two million dollars ($2,000,000)
aggregate. This general liability insurance shall provide protection against the general
liability, police professional liability, and error and omission of Federal Way. Federal Way
shall provide certificates of insurance demonstrating coverage by the required insurance.
Federal Way shall name the City of Kent as an additional named insured on its liability
policy (in regard to arrest, detention, charging or transporting of prisoners), and a copy of
the additional insured endorsement shall be attached to the certificate. Kent reserves the
right to request a certified copy of the policy that evidences the above coverage.
Page 3
B. It is understood that Kent is a member of the Washington Cities Insurance
Authority (WCIA), an insurance pool of municipalities in the State of Washington, and as
such satisfies all insurance requirements under this agreement as long as Kent remains a
member of WCIA or otherwise secures .insurance with the same coverage as required by
Federal Way herein.
IX. SEVERABILItY
If any provisions of this agreement shall be held invalid, the remainder of this
agreement shall not be affected thereby if such remainder would then continue to serve
the purposes and objectives of both parties.
X. ENTIRE AGREEMFNT
This agreement represents the entire understanding of the parties. It supersedes any
oral representations that are inconsistent with or modify its terms and conditions.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this agreement to be executed on
the day written below.
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
By:
MAYOR
DATE:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
DATE:
CITY ATTORNEY, CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
DATE:
jailint. k
CITY OF KENT
By:
MAYOR
DAL F:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
DATE:
CITY ATTORNEY, CITY OF KENI
DATE:
Page 4
Kent City Council Meeting
Date October 1, 1996
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: BOATING SAFETY PROGRAM APPLICATION - APPROVAL
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Authorization for the Mayor to sign a
Boating Safety Program application. The Kent Police Department
was invited to submit an application to obtain boating program
approval. This program allows for approved agencies to be
eligible for a percentage of the monies received for recrea-
tional boat registration fees in their county. Monies received
through this program must be deposited in a dedicated account
and can only be used for boating safety program activities.
This is the application process only and in no way guarantees
approval to be eligible for these funds. The application,
however, does require signature of the Mayor.
3. EXHIBITS: Application
4. RECOMMENDED BY: Staff and Public Safety on 9/17/96 (2-0)
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
0
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 30
KENT POLICE DEPARTMENT
Memcra ndum
TO: ED CRAWFORD, CHIEF r POLICE
II?: DAVE EVER-"- CAP"-A=N, PA`^RCL DI'77SiON
BOB CLINE, --IEUTE:I?-'IT, PATRCL DI7ISION
?RCM: BRUCE WEISSICH, E?. EANT, ?ATROL DI7ISION
SUBJECT: APPLIC__TION/REQUEST -0R 30ATING SAFETY PROGRAM APPROVAL
Prior to Aucu_- 12, _?5,, - was contacted by Mark Kenny o:
Washington Star= _ar'{s. During cur _cnversation Mr Rennv 'invited
cur acenc_� t -rplT cecomei:.ave an apprcved boatinc sa----T
trcgram. He __.=crned me =hat he wculd be senaing a packez to -he
�jecart-tent --.a- -..culd neec -o �,e '__red cu- ana returned -o State
?arks as soon -C --cssii_a.
The packet Was __celved a- -he Department or. Auaust 12th, and a:t=_
r=ad4Ina thrcuch - _ = _car-t made c-r.tac- with Mr le_^.nv. e
suageSte'1 -_^_a- .ve "1-__ _ _e r�=Ya'^,_e'� _ C!T that had been _nCl',CEG
=-h the caci{e = _- w_=_ _ _cr- y- =r = - e`�i e*a. A ar_= _
was ccmbleted _ :axec
NRe_n Mr (enr.-= _-_-CnLaC--�'; me zn �o , ne advised t-a-- he ..ad
--av eTwed -he -�aca3- anc- ter,_ " _-,e _:, s,. cesz-cn - _. _ _ ame..d one 1_- " e
the aouL_a-===,• _ _ mere _ -re acket as ^e success=d an�
-_-S att_cnec
Mr {ennv alsc = uCes-CC ___ - :vnen -r.e aC:te- was mailed -.- Sta-a
ar:tS -zat -___r_-e a me=;' MS --OSe 7'-l-anueva 1,n.urac wh-
_s the 3cati:lq _a-..J Qm -r3 Jr.
3aseC Upon _.-_e= "ie_Sa _ .^. -.1a-- _ _7aa :vit:l you C h`e-,
S1bseCuenz1v _c:- a mess�Ce =..� :4r "ennv --a-z we would 'oe sendinc
-7e °�C{Omple-eC, -ac,'iet a_'ter _- had been ancrcved by the
l� l.unC.�i-, w'. ?-------e arr:--a Sate at ':ice O=`�Ce Ci OCtOoer
In the messace t_ ' e: t 'cr him with that information =
asked that he car- me _--her=_-.,as anv Prcbi.em with that and I have
:,ez heard back :rem him.
?lease contact me "with an%- guest_cns that vcu might have.
August 9, 1996
viENIORAND UNI
TOE
Interested County and City Law E:uorcement zenc:es
Rose Viilanueva_4-murao-
Boatin2 Law Administrator•
�ooiicarion To Obrain Boating ?.ogram _�onrc�:ai
:e -Washington Mare?ar{s & Z.-c.eation Commissions 7:cv; acc=ing arcHcaticns
enicrcetnem agencies :or 3oa= gaiety ?-o�am :?pprovai. Zecrearicnai 'teat -e^strarcn :ees
-or counties a.;d -,:ties are mace avariabie through RC`n% 33 =.-a0. =ees :oust oe cet•es:rea . a
aeaicated account oe; RC W 3S. )2.045 and :an oniv oe 'sec :cr'caring saieri orcZ"am ac:I.vMes.
?-cram-couiremenis are estaodshed n IVa C inc are -e,re'ved annuaiiv :cr comp ante.
Compieted appiicariens must oe 5uomitted no :ate. -han : )G ,mom Moncay. auras =b. eiays
mn ce avoided s a aralt copy of ne anunc=n :s :aYea ":50-- _- "=9a1 :er -e'rie v .o e e.
lSar{ <ennv �wesre.n :Vashinzton agencies; or Deusz tronQ : esrern ,Washington agencies,
oe:ore subrnirting :he nnal anc; canon. Acciicaiions must Je 3igpec cv -,ne caair of =7e :cunt-
cor�missieners or city counc:i. ���roved o:rr creams . n s. �e?er:ate v�th ae cuntr u Lso
approved) ibr remstranon =eeS.
i zin2 JI approved 7roa-arcs :n _995 and a iecatel %esse:: .srrat:cn _eeS :s enc:Csec --'or
reference. Questions can oe cirecred to Mark, 3',ennv 90=-3=10) Cr :Deu_ S irong 9G_-3_
E:ic.o sures
WASHINGTON STATE PARKS 8, RECREATION COMMISSION
1996 APPROVED BOATING SAFETY PROGRAMS
1. Asotin County Sheriff Department
2. Benton County Sheriff Department
3. Chelan County Sheriff Department
4. Chelan Police Department
5. Clallam County Sheriff Department
6. Clark County Sheriff Department
7. Cowlitz County Sheriff Department
8. Douglas County Sheriff Department
9. Ferry County Sheriff Department
10. Franklin County Sheriff Department
11. Grant County Sheriff Department
(Grays Harbor County Program not approved. funds go to Ocean Shores)
12. Ocean Shores Police Department
13. Island County Sheriff Department
14. Jefferson County Sheriff Department
15. King County Sheriff Department
16. Mercer Island Dept of Public Safety
17. Seattle Police Department, Harbor Patrol
18. Kitsap County Sheriff Department
19. Bainbridge Island Police Department
20. Poulsbo Police Department
21. Kittitas County Sheriff Department
22. Klickitat County Sheriff Department
23. Lewis County Sheriff Department
24. Mason County Sheriff Department
25. Shelton Police Department
26. Okanogan County Sheriff Department
27. Pend Oreille County Sheriff Department
28. Pierce County Sheriff Department
29. Bonney Lake Police Department
30. Gig Harbor Police Department
31. San Juan County Sheriff Department
32. Skamania County Sheriff Department
33. Skagit County Sheriff Department
34. Anacortes Police Department
35. Snohomish County Sheriff Department
36. Everett Police Department
37. Lake Stevens Police Department
38. Spokane County Sheriff Department
39. Stevens County Sheriff Department
40. Thurston County Sheriff Department
41. Olympia Police Department
42. Lacey Police Department
43. Wahkiakum County Sheriff Department
44. Walla Walla County Sheriff Department
45. Whatcom County Sheriff Department
46. Whitman County Sheriff Department
47. Yakima County Sheriff Department
VESSEL REGISTRATION FEES
ALLOCATION TO COUNTIES
Fees
Minimum
Collected
Eligible Allocation Unallocat
Total
Counties
FY 1995
Counties Adjustme - Fees
Remitted
Adams
3,636.16
0.00
Asotin
3,919.41
3,919.41
3,919.41
Benton
49,397.79
49,397.79
49,397.79
Chelan
27,573.04
27,573.04
27,673.04
Clallam
31,085.24
31,085.24
31,085.24
Clark
78,342.17
78,342.17
78,342.17
Columbia
1,429.43
0.00
Cowlitz
33,371.01
33,371.01
33,371.01
Douglas
13,036.17
13,036.17
13,036.17
Ferry
1,778.56
1,778.56
1,778.56
Franklin
15,624.96
15,624.96
15,624.96
Garfield
849.76
0.00
Grant
23,852.44
23,852.44
23,852.44
Grays Harbor
23,411.09
23,411.09
23,411.09
Island
31,480.47
31,480.47
31,480.47
Jefferson
16,244.16
16,244.16
16,244.16
King
420,332.48
420,332.48
420,332.48
Kitsap
73,869.43
73,869.43
73,869.43
Kittitas
7,226.21
7,226.21
7,226.21
Klickitat
4,051.16
4,051.16
4,051.16
Lewis
16,395.67
16,395.67
16,395.57
Lincoln
6,066.86
0.00
Mason
29,504.30
29,504.30
29,50A.30
Okanogan
9,294.51
9,294.61
9,294.61
Pacific
7,937.64
0.00
Pend Oreille
3,879.89
3,879.89
3,879.89
Pierce
165,754.99
165,754.99
165,754.99
San Juan
15,743.53
15,743.53
15,743.53
Skagit
52,329.12
52,329.12
52,329.12
Skamania
2.074.98
2,074.98
2,074.98
Snohomish
167,158.08
167,158.08
167,158.08
Spokane
91,938.28
91,938.26
91,938.26
Stevens
13,286.48
13,286.48
13,286.48
Thurston
60,859.61
60,859.61
60,859.61
Wahkiakum
2,272.60
2,272.60
2,272.60
Walla Walla
9,762.31
9,762.31
9,762.31
Whatcam
52,460.87
52,460.87
52,460.87
Whitman
8,020.75
6,020.75
6,020.75
Yakima
47,158.13
47,158.13
47,158.13
Totals
1,520,509.82
1,600,589.97
1,600,589.97
Washington State
Parks and Recreation Commission
Request for
Boating Safety Program
Approval
Detach.
PSR A-299 (5/94)
DETACH AND RETAIN
INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING THE
REQUEST FOR BOATING SAFETY PROGRAM APPROVAL
USE ONLY THE FORM PROVIDED. Copies of the form may be made by the
applicant. Additional documentation, such as boating ordinances, copies of
mutual aid agreements, examples of daily logs, etc.) should be attached for
support of the program description when applicable.
FIRST TIME APPLICANTS. Complete entire request form and submit no later
than June 24, 1994.
APPROVED PROGRAM UPDATES. Complete only sections necessary to
accurately describe program.
Detach cover.
Page I Enter name of political subdivision and agency name; i.e., Thurston
County Sheriff's Department.
Page 2 The certification must be signed by a duly authorized representative of
the City Council, County Commission; i.e., Council Chair. The approved
request will be signed by the State Parks Director and returned.
Page 3 Identify agency, agency head (sheriff/chief/other), and date.
Complete the list of staff who are assigned to the boating safety
program. Identify those officers assigned and/or trained in specialized
areas of supervision, accident investigation, and boating education.
Coordinator of Boating Education Instructor -- Identify the officer or
agency staff person who is designated to coordinate volunteer boating
education instruction. See page 7, WAC 3526-65-040 (6).
Identify the Law Enforcement Commission held for each officer.
Identify the date of Basic Boating Safety Officer Training (use BOATING
TRN MLE column) for each Boating Safety Officer.
Show weekly schedule for boating safety patrol during peak of boating
season and identify beginning and ending dates of patrol season for the
year.
Page 4 through 8 Provide a brief description of how the agency's Boating Safety
Program meets each of the ten minimum requirements. Be sure the
statements for each of the ten program description questions address the
WAC requirements shown above the response block.
Show date the description is prepared.
Indicate if the description is an original or revision.
Page 5 TRAINING -- When an agency elects to do its' own Basic Boating Safety
Officer Training, the course must be approved by Washington State
Parks. Indicate in the block provided that a course approval was
requested.
Page 5 RULES AND REGULATIONS -- Check block if you have attached a copy
of the current boating ordinances being enforced by the agency's boating
safety officer. Reference the title or section of the Revised Code,
Administrative Code or County Ordinance where boating regulations are
to be found. It is not necessary to itemize all laws, rules or ordinances
enforced.
Page 6 EQUIPMENT --Provide basic information describing the vessels used for
boating safety patrol.
Page 9 LIMITATIONS ON USE OF FUNDS -- Provide the accounting code for the
Boating Safety Program dedicated account where the Annual Vessel
Registration Fees are deposited.
Request for
Boating Safety Program Approval
Submitted By:
n- t DF^a-`-emir (Agglicanil
to Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission
Contents
This Request for Boating Safety Program Approval consists of this request form
(including the Boating Safety Program Description), plus any attachments, addenda,
or amendments approved by the Director.
Statement of Purpose
RCW 88.12.295 States in Part:
The waters of Washington State provide a unique and valuable recreational resource
to large and growing numbers of boaters. Proper stewardship of, and respect for,
these waters requires that while enjoying them for their scenic and recreational
benefits, boaters must exercise care to assure that such activities do not contribute
to the despoliation of these waters, and that watercraft be operated in a safe and
responsible manner.
There is a need to educate Washington's boating community about safe and
responsible actions on our waters and to increase the level and visibility of the
enforcement of boating laws. To address the incidence of fatalities and injuries do to
recreational boating on our state's waters, local efforts directed towards safe boating
must be stimulated.
To provide for safe waterways and public enjoyment, portions of the boat registration
fee is available for boating safety purposes.
RCW 88.02.040 States in Part:
Eligibility for such fee allocation shall be contingent upon approval of the local boating
safety program by the State Parks and Recreation Commission.
Statement of Required Assurances
Chapter 352-65 WAC requires that each county or local jurisdiction requesting
approval of its boating safety program make the following assurances. The county
or local jurisdiction will:
(1) operate the boating safety program throughout its scheduled season(s) in
compliance with minimum program requirements now or hereafter specified in
WAC 352-65-040;
Page I
(2) deposit allocated funds into an account dedicated solely for supporting the
jurisdiction's boating safety program activities as specified in WAC 352-65-
040;
(3) submit to State Parks a copy of any audit which discloses disallowed or
questioned costs, and resolve to State Parks's satisfaction any findings
pertaining thereto;
(4) enforce boating safety equipment, vessel operation, noise level, and registration
laws as specified in Title 88 RCW, Navigation and Harbor Improvements, or as
specified in local rules or ordinances;
(5) (Counties only) equitably distribute state allocated funds to all eligible
jurisdictions within seventy-five days of the allocation from the state treasurer,
and notify State Parks of the amount distributed to each eligible jurisdiction;
(6) (Local jurisdictions only) enter into a cooperative agreement with the county for
distribution of available vessel registration funds;
Applicant must advise State Parks in writing of any material change to its boating
safety program so that compliance with the above required assurances including
minimum program requirements may be assessed
Certification
By this signature, Applicant, through its authorized representative, certifies that it has
read and understands the Statement of Required Assurances, and hereby makes the
required assurances and agrees to be bound thereby. Applicant understands that
failure to act consistent with one or more required assurances, or failure to advise
State Parks of material changes to its boating safety program, may be cause for
revocation of the Commission's approval of the Applicant's boating safety program.
Signature of Authorized Representative for
Governing Commission or Council
Print or Type Name
Approval
Director
Washington State Parks & Recreation Commission
Page 2
Date
Title
Date
boat iIIg 0drt.y .,GI
Staffing and Schedule
,b.ncy H«d — Date
Qency
Ken* PoLtce Department Efl CraN cr; Chief. cf POLicP
Name/flank mm ss on tdaatina Tm 1 L7nld Trw�nine Q.t. 1
Supervisor _
1 Sqt. Bruce weissich
2
1 Ofc. Dina Paaanucci
Lead Accident
Investigators
--------F
2 Sat- Bruce weissich
Boating Safety
Officers
i Ofc_ Dina Paaanucci
2 Ofc_ Russell walker
3 Ofc. Paul Luke
4 Ofc. Harry Hansen
5 Sqt. Bruce weissich
6
7
8
9
10
I
sat. Bruce weissich
Coordinator of :.
Boating Ed Instructor
Certified
Boating Ed Instructor
1
2
Patrol Season Begins: May 15th Patrol Season Ends: O=ata.L =t_ r.+i-,
Page 3
1.Boating Accident Reporting WAC 352-65-040(1)
A. Each county or local jurisdiction must provide an assurance that all serious or fatal accidents will be
thoroughly investigated to the maximum extent possible, and that copies of the investigative reports will be
submitted to state parks in a timely manner as specified in RCW 88.12.175.
B• The approved county or local jurisdiction must support the state-wide boating accident reporting system by:
i. Providing recreational boaters with copies of the state required boating accident report (BAR) from and
informing recreational boaters of their responsibility to submit the completed BAR in a timely fashion as
specified in RCW 88.12.155; and
ii. Submitting to state parks a completed boating accident report (BAR) form which includes all available
information about the accident or casualty as specified in chapter 352-70 WAC.
uesciioe me agency-s Doating acciaenr investigation ana acciaenr reporting program.
This agency will provide appropriate reports to State Parks as required by RCW 88.12.155
RCW 88.12.175, and WAC 352-70_
0 Origin!
❑ Revision
2. Boater Assistance WAC 352-65-040 (2)
The county or local jurisdiction will have the ability to respond or coordinate response to boating emergencies
which occur within its jurisdiction. Such emergencies may include swift water response, open water rescue, ice
rescue, vessel fire, overdue boater search, or other boating related emergencies or distress calls.
Describe how the agency will respond or coordinate response to boating emergencies.
This agency will respond to and/or assist wit`. cocrd_natinq boatinq-related emergencies
within its jurisdiction-
0 original
❑ Revision
4
Briefly describe how the Boating Safety Program meets the following minimum requirements.
3. Training WAC '352-65-040(3)
The county or local jurisdiction will be responsible for acquiring the training for its assigned boating safety
program personnel. The training will include basic boating safety officer training as provided by the United States
Coast Guard, Washington State paw, or any county or local jurisdiction whose training program is approved by
Washington State Parks.
Such training must be acquired within one year of initiating a new boating safety program, and within one year
for each newly assigned boating safety officer.
Describe the agency's boating safety officer training program. List trained officers on page 3.
u —0 ..,.,...nv fialninrf rnuise /s desired, Submit training course outTne.
4. Rules and Regulations WA 352-65-040(4)
When the county or local jurisdiction adopts ordinances governing recreational boating, the ordinances must be as
restrictive, but may be more restrictive than Washington State boating laws and regulations.
Identify the boating laws, rules and ordinances which are enforced by the agency's boating
safety officers. If local boating ordinances are enforced, please attach a current copy.
State Laws/Rules
^,'his agencv will ensure omclianc with RCSB 88.: RCW 88.02, taAC ?CP-?_.
and other state _aws rules �ectina recreationa' bcatinc.
Local Boating ordlnenC95
This agencv will ensure_ comnLiance with all ordinances that may be adcoted or enacted
by the City.
Ohers
Copy of current 6oating F
I(
or. Cop
attaehezO ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Ra"if'°"'
5. Enforcement WAC 352-65-040(5)
The county or local jurisdiction must provide:
a. Boating safety officers with law enforcement commissions which empower such officers to enforce all
boating laws and regulations;
b. A patrol schedule which insures the waterways are patrolled during peak recreational periods;
c. Response to on -water complaints, accidents, or emergencies;
d. The necessary boating safety patrol equipment. including vessel(s) capable of serving the minimum
requirements of this section. The patrol vessel must be properly marked and properly equipped as
provided in chapter 88.02 RCW and chapter 352-60 WAC.
Describe the agency's poTcies and procedures for boating safety law enforcement. Provide
current data on boating safety officers, commissions and training, and patrol schedule (page 3)
zr7ef itemize available vatrol eauipment.
A. All officers assigned tc work boating safety enforcement are commissioned to
enforce infraction, misdemeanor and felony boatinc laws and regulations-
B. This agency will patrol waterways as noted on the patrol schedule identified
on page 3.
C. This actencv will respond to on-water=ncidents as described in =2 on page ?.
D. Patrol equipment listed below.
0 origww
Equipment
Length
Power
Style
Year
ARIMA
19,
100 HP Mercury OB
96
Page 6
Briefly describe how the Boating Safety Program meets the following minimum requirements.
6. Boating Education WAC 352-65-040(6)
The county or local jurisdiction must have a boating education and information program satisfactory to State Parks.
a. A satisfactory boating education program may include any of the following: Presentations in primary and
secondary schools, to boating organizations, to youth groups or a course of instruction to the boating public
using lessons and materials from State Parks education curriculum, or other state or nationally recognized
curriculum approved by State Parks.
b. The county or local jurisdiction boating education and information program must:
i. Have an officer trained by State Parks as a boating education instructor;
ii. Have a designated officer to coordinate the activities of State Parks trained volunteer boating education
instructors and to act as liaison to boating education organizations; and
iii. Distribute boating safety information and materials, including materials provided by State Parks, to boating
and outdoor recreation organizations, the boating public, public agencies and the local media.
Describe the agency's boating education and pubic information program and provide specific
examples of activities the agency conducts. List certified Boating Education instructors and
nffrrar desionatad to coordinate volunteer instructors, (page 3).
A. This agency will conduct and/or coordinate presentations to schools, boating
organizations, and the public using lesson plans and materials approved by
State Parks.
B. This agency will have an officer trained as a boating education instructor by
State Parks. An officer will coordinate activities of State Parks' trained
volunteers and act as a liaison to cther boating organizations and groups in
the jurisdiction_ Inrormaticn and materials wiL_ be distributed to the public,
boating organizations and locations, and the media.
❑ original
a Revision
Page 7
7. Waterway Marking WAC 352-65-040(7)
The county or local jurisdiction will use only those waterway markers which conform to the Uniform State
Waterway Marking System found in CHAPTER 352-66 WAC.
Describe the agency waterway marking program.
P'_acemen' o` an,/ cucys, s__ns, or aids na: a=_cn _.. 4at.ers o� th_s iu isdict_cn
_ ccmoly Wit.-, 3CW �0- 2 ._a; and WAC 3;2-6r
Q
❑ Revision
8. Boating safety inspections WAC 352-65-040(8)
The county or local jurisdiction will complete written boating safety inspections during enforcement and
informational contacts when considered safe and appropriate to document boater compliance with state boating
laws. State Parks will provide boating safety inspection forms. A copy of the completed inspection will be
submitted to State parks for statistical purposes.
Describe agency boating safety inspection program.
acencv w_1' _ cmplet_ bca:_nc sa-_nscecc__cns and suc-. _ C^_,es _:D
Mate Parks.
Q Rtvlsfon
Page 8
Briefly describe how the Boating Safety Program meets the tonowrng minimum requite«-ti,.
9. Reports WAC 352-65-040(9)
l report of activities performed through the boating
The county or local jurisdiction agrees to submit an annua
safety program and to submit an annual report of all program expenditures. The county or local jurisdiction
agrees to participate in state-wide boating surveys coordinated by State parks. Forms will be provided by State
Parks.
Describe the agency's method of recording activities. Include examples of report forms, dal y
logs, etc.
This agency wil-1 ccmoLete
and submit r=_torts _o ?arks in a ,__meLv *ashion.
❑ ori9wl
0 Revision
10. Limitations on use of funds WAC 352-65-040(10)
These funds are intended to increase education and enforcement efforts and to stimulate greaterThecountylocal icipat n
in boating safety and are not to supplant existing local funds used for boating safety programs.
or
local jurisdiction agrees to deposit boat registration fees allocated by the state treasurer under RCW 88.02.040,
into an account dedicated solely for boating safety purposes which include all activities or expenditures identified
in this section.
Describe agency's use of the allocated vessel registration funds. Identify boating safety
Page 9
Kent City Council Meeting
Date October 1, 1996
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: BUREAU OF JUSTICE ASSISTANCE BLOCK GRANT
APPLICATION - APPROVAL
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: The Police Department requests approval
of the application for Block Grant Funds from the Bureau of
Justice Assistance. A preliminary application was prepared and
submitted electronically to meet the required grant application
deadline. The request is for equipment and computer software,
the majority of which will focus on training.
The grant requires a 10% matching cash contribution and the
grant itself picks up the remaining 90%. The total amount will
be $61,030, with a 90% grant portion of $54,927 and a 10% city
match of $6,103.
The State of Washington Department of Community, Trade and
Economic Development advised they were in support of the City's
proposal and have advised the Police Department to submit the
request directly to the Bureau of Justice for approval and
funding.
3. EXHIBITS: Application
4. RECOMMENDED BY: Staff and Public Safety on 9/17/96 (2-0)
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
RN
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 3P
KENT POLICE DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Jim White
CC: Ed Crawford- Chief of Police
FROM: Captain Jim Miller
DATE: July 8, 1996
SUBJECT: Bureau of Justice Assistance Block Grant Application
On behalf of the City of Kent and the Kent Police Department I have been asked to
submit and application for a block Grant from the Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA). This grant
application unlike others I have worked on is intended to be submitted via computer modem.
Attached you will find a printout of the computer fields of information requested.
The grant requires a 101/o matching cash contribution. The Gant pick up the remaining
90%. The total amount of the grant will be 561,030. Grant portion will be SJ4,927. City
matching 10% come to 56.103. We have applied for the total amount to be designated to
equipment and computer software, the majority of which will focus on training. Some of the
equipment will be used at the Police/Fire Training Center.
I have also photo copied and attached pages 4 & 5 of the grant information packet. Trey
discuss the requirements for the City in the following: establishing a trust fund for deposit of
Federal payments, establishing an Advisory Board, and holding a public meeting (I believe that
could be accomplished as part of a regularly scheduled Public Safety Committee Meeting).
The Advisory Board is to include one member from each of the following: Local law
enforcement agency (Kent Police Department), Local prosecutors office, Local court system.
Local public school system, and Local non profit group. The advisory board will be authorized
to make nonbinding recommendations on the use of funds received.
As required under the time guidelines of the application process I have forwarded a copy
to the appropriate State screening office (07-03-96). Twenty days following that date, but no
later than 08-08-96 I will electronically submit our application to BJA. Your physical signature
is not required, however, filling in the information in fields l? - 16 (highlighted on the attached)
does signify the Cities intent to comply with all requirements of the grant.
TRPNSMIT REPORT
USER
CpM REMOTE STATION I STPRT TIME DLRPT I ON PAGES RESULT ID
No.
7E41 206 859 ss.2 I08-08 14:10 01,00 02/02 Ou
19-4,--•OS-0S 14:11
20s S1= 2067
ZIT) KENT MPYORS OFC
REMQRI[S
043es
1c. ?DDh P.
rry
STATE Of WA5HING70N
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY, TRADE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
906 Columbia St SW ' PO Bar 48300 • Olympia. Waahingrau 9504-jjVV * (360) 733-2200
Aagust 8,1996
TO: Local Lave Enforcement Block Grant Program
BJA Direct Grant Applicants
FROM: Kenny Spam, Program Coordiastor
SUBJECT: State Receipt Of Grant Application
I . pleased to inform you that your application for funding through the fcdnral Local Law
Enforcement Block Grant Program has been received. We support your proposal. Plcasc
submit your application directly to the Bureau of Justice ($JA) for approval and funding.
If you have any questions in regard to the Local Law Enforccrnart Block Giant Program or
your application, please contact the U.S. Departrnerlt of Justice Responsc Center at 1-800-
421-6770. Thank you.
LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANTS PROGRAM' !V E D
LOCAL APPLICAION FORM 1 ja0;
1. Vendor Number Or E_I.N._.:91600124 E-Mail Addr.:
2. Locality Type ............. City/Municipality
3. Applicant's Starting Fiscal Year..: January
4. Name Of Organization.:
City of Kent
5. ounty..............: KING
6. Street Address.......: 220 South Fourth Avenue
7. Additional Address...:
B. City: Kent
11. Gantee Type: COPS
9.State: WA
Communiiy iusistaxe Div,
1D.ZipCode: 96032-5895
---- CEO DATA --------------------------------------
12. C.E.O. Prefix_: Mr.
13. First Name......: Jim
14. Initial.........
15 Last Name ...... : White
16. Title..........: Mayor
17. PHONE..........: (206) 8S9-33:5
18. FAX............ 46) 813200-7 .
19. LOCES NUMBE.._:
-------------------------- CONTACT DATA,---------- -------------------
--------
J. PREFIX......... Mr.'
21. FIRST NAME....: Jim
22. IITIAL NAME..: M.
23. LAST NAME.....: Miller
24. PHONE........: (206) 659-417
2. FAX...........: (2D6) 89-6572
-----------------------
26.
Payment
Contact .............:
Ms Mary Ann Kern
21.
Payment
Code ................
CHECK
28.
Federal
Congnizant Agency...:
DOJ
29. Award mount .Federal:$ 54,927.00 B.Match:$ 6,103.0
30. Date Sent To State: 07/03/96 31. Date sent S.P.O.C:
2. PURPOSE AREA
A.LAW ENFORCEMENT FUND
a.ZRING.....:$ 0.00 d.CURRENT OFFICERS.... 0
b.OVERTIME ... :$ 0.00 e.OFFICERS TO HIRE...: 0
c.EQUIPRMNT..:$ 54,927.00 fSIIPPORTPERSONNEL..: 0
j J (1) SWORN [ ) (2)CIVILIAN
B.CRIME PREVENTION ...... :$ 0.00
C . MCiANCING SEC _ ...... - - : S 0.00 ( ) ('-)SCHOOLS ) ( 2) OTrTnrZ
D.DRUG COURTS......... 0.00 [ ] (1)
ESTABLISH [ J (2)SUPPRT
'.ENHANCING ADJUDICATION:$ 0.00 [ ) (1)ADULTS ( ] (2)JUVENILES
.MULTI-JURISTASK FORCE:$ 0.00 ( ] RURAL AREA
G. INURANCE........... :$ 0.00
33.Matching Funs Source: State and local units of government
}leb
1 t
STATE OF WASHINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY, TRADE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
906 Cdumbia St. 5W • PO Box 45300 • Olympia. Warbington 98304-6300 • (360) 753-2200
August 8, 1996
TO: Local Law Enforcement Block Grant Program
BJA Direct Grant Applicants
FROM: Kenny Spain, Program Coordinator
SUBJECT: State Receipt Of Grant Application
I am pleased to inform you that your application for funding throush the Federal Local Law
Enforcement Block Grant Program has been received. We support your proposal. Please
submit your application directly to the Bureau of Justice (BJA) for approval and funding.
If you have any questions in reward to the Local Law Enforcement Block Grant Program or
your application, please contact the U.S. Departm_nt of Justice Response Center at I-800-
421-6770. Thank you.
0-10 0
Kent City Council Meeting
Date October 1, 1996
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: RUSSELL ROAD STREET VACATION - ORDINANCE
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Adoption of Ordinance No. vacating
a portion of Russell Road. Council recently approved this
street vacation subject to the applicant first fulfilling
certain conditions, all of which have been met. Accordingly,
it is now appropriate to pass this ordinance to vacate this
part of Russell Road.
3.
4
E
C:
7.
EXHIBITS: Ordinance
RECOMMENDED BY: City Council and Public Works Committee
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
seconds
Council Agenda
Item No. 3Q
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Kent, Washington,
relating to the vacation of streets, vacating a portion of Russell
Road, an existing public street, lying generally south of the
southerly right of way line of South 228th Street in the City of
Kent.
WHEREAS, a petition was filed with the City of Kent by various owners of
property abutting the applicable portion of Russell Road, an existing public street,
lying generally south of the southerly right of way line of South 228th Street in the City
of Kent, King County, Washington; and
WHEREAS, the Kent Planning Director processed this petition and secured
technical facts pertinent to the question of this vacation along with a recommendation
as to approval or rejection by the Public Works Department; and
WHEREAS, the Kent City Council fixed a time when said petition would be
heard and the hearing was held with proper notice on May 7, 1996, at 7:00 p.m. in the
City Council Chambers of the Kent City Hall; and
WHEREAS, the Public Works Department and Planning Director recommended
that the City Council approve the petition upon the petitioner's fulfillment of certain
conditions; and
i
WHEREAS, after the public hearing on May 7, 1996, the City Council approved
the vacation so long as the petitioner first fulfilled all the conditions recommended by
staff and approved by Council; and
WHEREAS, the petitioner has now fulfilled all of the conditions imposed by
Council; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the street sought to be vacated is: (1) an
open, dedicated street and presently being used as a street; (2) not abutting on a body
of water and therefore not suitable for acquisition for port purposes, boat moorage or
launching sites, park, viewpoint, recreational or education purposes, or other public
use; and (3) a vacation which is in the public interest; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has directed the preparation of an ordinance
vacating the portion of said street; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1 . The forgoing recitals are incorporated as if fully set forth herein.
Section 2. That portion of Russell Road lying generally south of the southerly
right of way line of South 228th Street in the City of Kent as described in Exhibit A,
which is attached and incorporated herein by this reference, is hereby vacated.
Section 3. No vested rights shall be affected by the provisions of this
ordinance.
2
Section 4. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days from
the time of its final passage as provided by law,.
JIM WHITE, MAYOR
ATTEST:
BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ROGER A. LUBOVICH, CITY ATTORNEY
PASSED the day of 1996.
APPROVED the day of 1996.
PUBLISHED the day of , 1996.
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of Ordinance No.
passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, and approved by the
Mayor of the City of Kent as hereon indicated.
STVAC41 1 .ORD
BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK
3
EAL)
DODDS ENGINEERS, INC.
BELLEVUE, WA 98007
DEl Project No: 94133
2/22/96
RUSSELL ROAD VACATION DESCRIPTION
That portion of the southwest quarter of Section 14, Township 22 North, Range 4
East, W.M., and the David A. Neely Donation Land Claim No. 37, all in King
County, Washington, described as follows:
Commencing at the northwest corner of Tract L-3, City of Kent Short Plat No. 86-
21, as recorded under King County Recording No. 8706041575, also being a
point on the east line of Tract L-1, The Lakes at Kent, Division No. 1, according
to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 136 of Plats, pages 41 through 45,
inclusive, records of said county; thence along the north line of said Tract L-1
the following courses and distances; thence N07047'54"W 62.92 feet; thence
S83054'33"W 70.67 feet; thence S77014'39"W 103.28 feet; thence S88018'50"W
106.75 feet; thence S79024'00"W 70.95 feet; thence S58009'11"W 102.94 feet;
thence leaving said north line, N22037'30"W 108.22 feet; thence N67022'00"E
40.93 feet; thence N20043'00"W 105.45 feet; thence N15000'00"W 161.85 feet;
thence S39023'00"W 103.00 feet: thence N50025'00"W 149.72 feet; thence
N87059'44"W 388.32 feet to the east right of way margin of 53rd Place South
(Russell Road): thence N02003'30"E, along said east margin, 108.00 feet to the
POINT OF BEGINNING of the herein described tract; thence continuing
N02003'30"E, along said east margin, 682.84 feet to the south right of way
margin of south 228th Street; thence N88027'57"W, along said south margin,
60.00 feet to the west right of way margin of said 53rd Place South; thence
S02003'30"W, along said west margin, 682.29 feet; thence S87056'30"E 60.00
feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Contains 40,954± square feet (0.9402± Acres)
VWAS
Jl�.:QF W.4Sfrf.9 �
�v �4, �a
. P
cis .p 10427 R,Q..
s rsT� ,• J
• 5
-4G LA O
SPIRES 10/26/4(0
ZZ (C� l.lJ
EXHIBIT !l
94133L30.doc; 02/22/96; Pg: l
Kent City Council Meeting
Date October 1, 1996
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: BECK SHORT PLAT SEWER EXTENSION - BILL OF SALE
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works
Director, authorization to accept the bill of sale for Beck
Short Plat Sewer Extension submitted by Kenneth and Lois Beck
for continuous operation and maintenance of 165.4 feet of
sanitary sewer improvements, and release of bonds after
expiration period. This project is located at 22840 96th
Avenue South.
3.
4.
R
L
VA
EXHIBITS: Vicinity map
RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Director
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
moves, Councilmember seconds
Council Agenda
Item No. 3R
0 PL i �_SE 210TH
tv PL 5 211 TH ST
. . ....... - ----- S 212TIl ST *L ------ SE J-
----------
212
iH to SE 212TH ST
213 9S 7H
213 PL Y
2 CT
213 P
SE 213TH PL
---.L 213T8
p
,ii ST L
21
PL WPL
S 216TH ST ',21 ST M ST! �1:4
>
SE
2 15 TH ST
SE
218 j� co
----------- ST - CD
218TH ST
p 4t f — j r TH PL
SEI 219TH,
%
!SE 220TH ST w20 T 110
220 -
PVT
11222N0 S�T%
2221,10 ST / 1 - ,
222NDJST
I
SE 224TH ST
224PL
225 ST
1 SE
225 PL
225
222ND I ST
226TH ST
x to
k,, LL E 22
S 22JTH ST S 228TH __7TH _j
o
228 CT SE 228TH ST
22 7H ST
PIR JECT LOCATION Tz 229 22
SE 231 ST 230 PL I!
�2
i NOVRC LN S 232NO 2 2ND ST 232N0
SE 232 ST:
SE 232NO PL i
o
CT 233 PL
o
Pl. i l
�E -----------------
SE 236 TH
T J
I -.L 2SE 236TH PL 2" T
SOULDRON WAY 237TH 37TH ST
3Ti
PL SE 2387H
GEORG c
w ilI 1 5 238TH
�EST
Sz! 239TH STVIEW CT IO2 3jti-
tST 5 H PL3
239TH IT
i S 240TH 23
cn
CE
24 151 ST
w
PIONEEI
-
I ST 5 E21142ND ST
p
-jS 242N0 CTI
<4
M JIL AN TEMP HNCE 5T i
'--5 —2Q31IDIST
SMITH j ST 244TH
WAR
BECK SHORT PLAT
C(It
Kent City Council Meeting
Date October 1, 1996
Category Other Business
1. SUBJECT: DISASTER REIMBURSEMENT FUNDS - AUTHORIZATION TO
DISTRIBUTE
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: The Emergency Management Unit of the
Kent Fire Department has been successful in recovering funds
from State and Federally declared disasters. In order to help
departments accurately plan for and reflect their expenditures,
staff requests that the latest and all future disaster funds be
accepted into a revenue account and then appropriately distri-
buted to the respective departments' expenditure accounts. Any
other proposed distribution of funds would come through the
appropriate Council committee. The Public Safety Committee
would continue to be briefed as to the amount of funds re-
covered from disasters.
3. EXHIBITS: Executive Summary and memorandum from Kent Disaster
Management Unit
4. RECOMMENDED BY: Fire Chief Chief of Staff Emergency
Management Unit
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
C-V
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED:
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
-`.! r is moves Councilmember ( seconds
Councilmember ,
that the Fire Chief be authorized to have the $5,209 and all
future State and Federal Disaster Reimbursement Funds first
placed in a revenue account and then appropriately distributed
to the respective departments' expenditure account.
DISCUSSION:
) f' (
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 4A
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
SEPTEMBER 25, 1996
TO: MAYOR JIM WHITE, COUNCIL PRESIDENT CHRISTI HOUSER,
COUNCILMEMBERS WOODS, JOHNSON, ORR, CLARK,
EPPERLY, BENNETT
FROM: NORM ANGELO, FIRE CHIEF -�A Ca
SUBJECT: DISASTER REIMBURSEMENT FUNDS
BACKGROUND:
The staff of the Emergency Management Unit have done extremely well in helping the City
recover funds from disasters that were covered by Federal and State Declaration. We have
been able to recover an additional $5,209.00 related to the February, 1996 flooding. We are
asking that these funds go first into a revenue account and then be distributed to the respective
departments' expense accounts from which the funds were originally drawn.
Secondly, we are asking Councils' permission for all future funds recovered from disaster and
state mobilization reimbursements be distributed in this same manner. The Emergency
Management Unit will identify the appropriate accounts and amounts to be distributed based
upon the percentage of the expense category recovered. If funds were recommended for
deposit in any account other than the one from which it came, the request would be brought
through the appropriate Council committee.
In addition, as funds are reimbursed we will keep the Public Safety Committee informed as to
the amounts of expenses reimbursed.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Fire Chief working with the Finance Services Division, be authorized to deposit these
in a revenue fund and then have the appropriate funds distributed to the expense accounts of
the respective departments that made the original expenditure.
Executive Summary
September 25, 1996
Page 2
SIGNIFICANCE:
While it will not reflect 100% of the disaster related costs, it will give the departments,
Administration and Council more accurate reflection of expenditure in light of disaster funds
recovered.
ALTERNATIVES:
Place recovered revenues account and be aware that department budgets are more likely to
appear overspent.
tcn
MEMORANDUM
SEPTEMBER 18, I996
TO: Brent McFall, Laurie Murray, Norm Angelo, Jed Aldridge, Don Wickstrom,
Paul Scott, Frank Spanjer, Stan Wade
FROM: Diana Praast, Emergency Management
SUBJECT: February 1996 Flood - Disaster Reimbursemen- Monies
FEMA 1100-DR-WA
We have received additional monies for the February flooding. The money was deposited on the
City of Kent Treasury Receipt #20925 in the amount of $5,209,00. The breakdown is as follows:
For DSR#621312 - $ 941 .00 (Federal)
647.00 (State)
Public Works/Engineenng Geo-Technical Contractor for 218th landslide
For DSR#62 1313 - $ 966.00 (Federal)
655.00 (State)
Public Works/Engineering Debris Removal for 2 8th ''andslide (PARTIAL PAYMENT)
The distribution of monies is as follows:
PUBLIC WORKS - ENGINEERING
Account # 175-001-000-5530-3301 15 (Federal) $3907.00
175-001-000-5530-340 i 02 (Sta:e1 302.00
TOTAL FEDERAL/STATE MONIES RECEIVED $5209.00
This leaves a balance of $5,000 outstanding for DSR#6213 13. Once this money is received an
allocation into the expenditure accounts will be done for all—Maining monies.
Kent City Council Meeting
Date October 1, 1996
Category Other Business
1. SUBJECT: COMPRESSION BRAKES - ORDINANCE
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: A citizen who resides near Military Road
on the West Hill asked the City to consider outlawing the use
of compression brakes within the City limits because of the
extremely high noise levels they generate. After review and
consideration by the Public Works and Public Safety Committees,
the attached ordinance makes use of compression brakes unlawful
in the City of Kent.
3. EXHIBITS: Ordinance
4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Safety Committee (2-0, Bennett absent)
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
0
%/
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember1 seconds
to adopt Ordinance No. which makes the use of/
compression brakes in the City of Kent unlawful.
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
pi 0
Council Agenda
Item No. 4B
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of
Kent, Washington, prohibiting the use of compression brakes,
establishing a penalty, containing a severability clause and
setting an effective date.
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that prohibiting the use of compression
brakes will reduce unnecessary noise in the City: and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that this ordinance is in the interests of the
public health, safety and welfare; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES
HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The following new section regarding the use of compression
brakes shall be added to the Kent City Code:
Sec. 9.36.060 - Compression brakes restrictions.
a. Compression brakesQrohibited. No person shall use motor vehicle brakes
within the city limits that are in anv wav activated or operated by the compression of the
engine of that motor vehicle or any unit or part thereof. It shall be an affirmative defense
to prosecution under this section that the compression brakes were applied in an
emergency and were necessary for the protection of persons and/or property.
b Violation - Penalty. Any person violating these compression brake provisions
shall have committed a traffic infraction and a penalty of $100 00 shall be imposed
c Signpostina The director of public works is authorized and directed to post
appropriate signs consistent with these provisions.
SECTION 2. If any one or more sections, sub -sections, or sentences of this
Ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance and the same shall remain in full force
and effect.
SECTION 3. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days
from the time of its final approval and passage as provided by law.
JIM WHITE, MAYOR
ATTEST:
BRENDA JACOB ER, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ROGER A. LUBOVICH, CITY ATTORNEY
PASSED day of
APPROVED day of
1996.
1996.
PUBLISHED day of , 1996.
I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No. passed
by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the
City of Kent as hereon indicated.
BRAKE.ORD
BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK
91
EAL)
CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS
A.
R E P 0 R T S
A. COUNCIL PRESIDENT
B. OPERATIONS COMMITTEE
C
a
PUBLIC WORKS COMMI
PLANNING COMMITTEE
E. PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITT
F. PARKS COMMITTEE
G. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS 1 zti 1'11�2 "Z14
MEMORANDUM
OCTOBER 1, 1996
TO: MAYOR PROTEM JON JOHNSON
COUNCIL PRESIDENT CHRISTIE HOUSER
COUNCILMEMBERS WOODS, ORR, CLARK, EPPERLY AND BENNETT
FROM: BRENT MCFALL, DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS
SUBJECT: TRANSFER OF ASSETS FROM KING COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION
DISTRICT #37
As a result of the Meridian Annexation and in accordance with State law, 21.88 % of the District's
assets has been negotiated to be transferred. The tentative agreement would transfer Station 72,
located at SE 256th and 140th SE and all it's related furniture, apparatus and equipment to the
City of Kent. The City of Kent would owe King County Fire Protection District #37 the
difference of $168,118.57. It has been agreed that the Meridian Valley Annexation would likely
occur within the next year. The Fire District has agreed for one year to allow the difference
($168,118.57) to be credited together with the interest that would have been earned against the
potential Meridian Valley Annexation transfer of assets. The interest rate would be set by the
interest rate that King County Fire Protection District #37 would receive through the County
Investment Pool. That rate has averaged 6.1133 %. Should the Meridian Valley Annexation not
go through within a year, we would negotiate payment for cost of the difference of assets not
required to be transferred.
Councilmember moves and Councilmember secondes that we accept the
tentative agreed upon transfer of assets from King County Fire Protection District #37 under the
conditions listed in the October 1st memorandum from Brent McFall, Director of Operations.
OPERATIONS COMMTT rEE MINUTES
AUGUST 21, 1996
COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT: Jon Johnson -Committee Chair, Leona Orr
STAFF PRESENT: Dea Drake, John Hillman, Roger Lubovich, Kelli O'Donnell, Ron Spang
MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC: None
The meeting was called to order at 4:42 p.m. by Chairperson Johnson.
pproval of Vouchers: All claims for the period ending August 15, 1996 in the amount of $4,120,548.03
were approved for payment.
1996 Bona. Issue Budget Chand_e
Assistant Finance Director John Hillman stated that the Council had previously approved the bond issue,
this request is a formality to approve the capital expenses, debt service and sources of funds. Hillman
reviewed the sources of revenue for the debt service with the Committee. After Hillman completed his
review, Committeemember Orr asked if this would be adopted at the September 3 Council Meeting.
Hillman replied that it would, this action will approve the actual budget change. Committeemember Orr
moved to adopt a budget change for $27,401,866 for capital and debt service budget for the 1996 General
Obligation Bonds to be forwarded to the September 3 City Council meeting. Johnson seconded the motion
which passed 2-0. (Committeemember Jim Bennett concurred via telephone with the vote.)
1997 Budget Process Calendar Review
John Hillman reviewed the 1997 Budget Calendar with the Committee. Hillman noted that the September
3 adoption of the Capital Facilities Plan will be deleted. The Budget Hearing of September 17 will include
the Capital Facilities Plan with the final Capital Facilities Plan being adopted as part of the Comprehensive
Plan.
July Financial Report
John Hillman reviewed the July Financial Report with the Committee. He noted that the cash and
investments are up $10 million from 1995 due to the bond issue and funds accumulating for projects.
During his review of fines and forfeitures, Hillman noted that they were coming in lower than expected and
the budget may need to be adjusted. Jon Johnson asked why fines and forefeitures were down. Hillman
replied that it maybe over budgeted and it may comeback up City Attorney Roger Lubovich responded
that he believed that a new collection agency had been hired by the Court. Hillman continued his review
of the financial report. Johnson asked if the reserve fund will continue to be added to for 1996. Hillman
responded that it would. During his review of the Criminal Justice fund, Hillman noted that it is still out
of balance by $36,000 and finance staff will work to bring it into balance.
After the July Financial Report was concluded, Committee Chair Johnson asked if there was any items to
be added to the agenda. There being none the meeting was adjourned at 5:15 p.m.
OPERATIONS COMMITTEE MINUTES
SEPTEMBER4, 1_996
COMMI-ITEE MEMBERS PRESENT: Jon Johnson -Committee Chair, Jim Bennett, Leona Orr
STAFF PRESENT: Brent McFall, May Miller, Kelli O'Donnell
MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC: None
The meeting was called to order at 4:43 p.m. by Chairperson Johnson.
A4212roval of Vouchers: Committee Secretary Kelli O'Donnell distributed a corrected combined check
summary and noted that a credit in the amount of $412.96 had not been included in the original summary.
Committeemember Orr asked why unemployment was broken down section by section with the largest
amount in recreation. McFall responded that recreation has the largest number of temporary employees
and that some accrue enough hours to qualify for unemployment. Finance Director May Miller noted that
they are broken down by department to show where the costs are. She noted that we now have a
contractor who monitors the claims which has reduced the costs. Orr moved to approve payment of
vouchers in the amount of $2,761,593.40. Bennett seconded the motion which passed 3-0.
1997 Capital Facilities Plan
Miller noted that the Council had previously reviewed the proposed CFP for 1997-2002 which will become
part of the city's Comprehensive Plan. She explained that 25% of sales tax is set aside for capital
improvement and 1/4 % of the real estate excise tax. Miller reviewed the current budget analysis noting
that out of $4.3 million, the fixed debt service is $1.9 million leaving an available balance of only
$2,050,000. She explained that by approving the entire six year plan the 1997 allocations would roll into
the 1997 operating budget with remaining years being updated annually. May reviewed the proposed
projects and debt service with the Committee and explained that the big unknown is still the manufacturing
sales tax exemption. Based on past collections, forecasting projects as much as a $1 million shortfall.
Miller noted that one way of offsetting the shortfall could be freeing some capital. On page 3 she noted that
the first column would take care of basic maintenance needs with the second column on hold and released
if funding becomes available.
After reviewing proposed projects, May reviewed the graph on page 10 with the Committee. She explained
that the graph denotes capital expenses for the city as a whole with public works being the majority.
Operations Director Brent McFall noted that the graph anticipates a voted bond for the Performing Arts
Center which may or may not occur. May Miller continued that on page 4, noting 1998 is still out of
balance. The property for an East Hill fire station has been identified for the purchase of land only. McFall
elaborated that as the time frame approaches a public safety bond issue will be looked at to identify capital
needs for police and fire. While reviewing page 7, May noted that the utility tax for the corridor projects
expires in 2002. She noted that the Shopper's Shuttle has been funded for 1997. While reviewing water
needs, Johnson asked when the last rate increase had occurred. Miller responded that we have actually
refunded in the past. Johnson asked if Metro would be increasing their rates. McFall noted that each basin
is analyzed separately. With more of Soos Creek annexed we will need to make adjustments in the future
for that area as we develop our Comprehensive Plan for Soos Creek. After concluding her review, May
stated that at this time she would ask the Committee to agree or disagree with the proposed plan with their
recommendation to be forwarded to Planning to be adopted as part of the Comprehensive Plan. Orr moved
to recommend adoption of the 1997 Capital Facilities Plan as amended. Bennett seconded the motion which
passed 3-0.
1997 Capital Facilities RAlic Hearin_o Date
May Miller stated that September 17 is the proposed public hearing to give the public an opportunity to
comment on the Capital Facilities Plan. McFall stated that since this would not go to Council until
OPERATIONS COMMITTEE MINUTES, CONT.
—Septernber 4}_1996
September 17 the public hearing should probably be set for October 2. Orr moved to set the public hearing
date for the 1997 Capital Facilities Plan for October 2, 1996 to be put on the Consent Calendar of
September 17. Bennett seconded and the motion passed 3-0.
Committee Chair Johnson asked if there was any further business to be heard. There being none the
meeting was adjourned at 5:19 p.m.
Page 2
PUBLIC WO1UrS COMMITTEE
September 18, 1996
PRESENT: Tim Clark Don Wickstrom
Judy Woods Gary Gill
Connie Epperly Tom Brubaker
Utility Tax Sunset/Concurrency
Wickstrom stated that the Utility Tax as presently exists under City Ordinance, Sunsets
in April of 2002 and our Six Year Plan expires at the end of 2002. That is one issue,
which is relatively simple. He noted that the bigger issue is, in developing the
Comprehensive Transportation Plan, we looked beyond 2002 past 2010 and, past
2020. Wickstrom said also that we know we have major needs to be implemented in
order to comply �%�Lh Concurrencv by 2010. He explained there are some segments of
the Corridor projects that could cost $30 - $40 Million dollars and in order to implement
them, they need to be started now. The lead time for those projects is extensive in
establishing the funding and the permit process. As we indicated, there is one in the
2002 program, which is the west leg of the S. 228th Corridor project.
Wickstrom said the other issue at hand is the railroad crossings. He said we have
nothing but on -grade crossings and there is a projection that freight rail traffic and
passenger train (including commuter rail) traffic will increase significantly. This is
another big "unknown" which needs to be addressed. The idea is to at least extend the
sunset clause until December 2006 which will give us some time to address all of the
issues. We can still remain in concurrence in terms of transportation, where it is
necessary to have the road capacity available to handle trips generated from new
development. For concurrence, that capacity needs to be there now in order to issue
building permits or, if there is a reasonable financial plan which shows that can be
implemented within 6 vears, which is the reason for 2002 issue. Wickstrom again stated
that if we don't have eoncurrencv we are forced to stop issuing building permits. He said
we have already reduced our service level in terms of transportation of our existing road
system.
Wickstrom noted that this was presented to the Chamber of Commerce last week at the
City Government Committee and they concurred with amending the Sunset Clause.
Wickstrom also noted the Chamber Board concurred also at their luncheon meeting
today.
Tim Clark clarified the issue and stated that basically, the Growth Management Act
requires that we stay concurrent with the population growth. One of the elements is
capacity of the transportation system which means capacity on the roads and, if we do
not bring our Capital Improvement Plan up to speed to meet those demands, the Citv
will be forced to stop issuing building permits. Wickstrom concurred.
Committee unanimously recommended that the Utilitv Tax Sunset Clause be extended
to December 31, 2006.
Street Vacation - Saar SL Railroad Avenue
Wickstrom said we have received a request for a street vacation and at this time we are
asking the Committee to recommend setting a public hearing date before Council.
When a petition is submitted we are required to act on it within a specified number of
days. Wickstrom noted that there is however, a house in the right of way which has
been there for sometime. He said this will need to be addressed when it goes before the
Public Hearing.
Committee unanimously recommended adoption of a resolution setting a hearing date
for the Saar/Railroad Ave. Street Vacation.
Meeting adjourned: 4:00 p.m.
2