Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Meeting - Council - Agenda - 09/17/1996 / v i CRYof Kent CRY Council Meeting A enda g CITY OF Mayor Jim White Council Members Christi Houser, President Jim Bennett Jon Johnson Tim Clark Leona Orr Connie Epperly Judy Woods September 17, 1996 Office of the City Clerk CITY OF 1"221J LS SUMMARY AGENDA KENT CITY COUNCIL MEETING September 17 , 1996 Council Chambers 7 : 00 p.m. MAYOR: Jim White COUNCILMEMBERS: Christi Houser, President Jim Bennett Tim Clark Connie Epperly Jon Johnson Leona Orr Judy Woods CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL 1. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ,A: Regional Justice Center Update Norway Sister City Presentation Proclamation - Constitution Week BPS. Proclamation - Day of Concern for the Hungry __E. Proclamation - National Payroll Week 2 . PUBLIC HEARINGS 1997-2002 Capital Facilities Plan 1997 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program 3 . CONSENT CALENDAR I-K. Approval of Minutes ,,R. Approval of Bills �C:" Discovery Grant - Accept D Pea Patch Grant - Accept Work Training Grant - Accept �: Mobile Recreation/Computer Grant - Appropriate G King County Conservation Futures Interlocal Cooperation Agreement - Amendment Surplus Vehicles - Authorization --�E: Kent Springs Transmission Main Repair - Accept as Complete d . Councilmember Absence - Johnson 4 . OTHER BUSINESS -A— Stream Buffer Requirements ZCA-96-4 - Ordinance Van Doren' s Landing, Building I, Rezone RZ-96-4 - Approval Green River Annexation AN-96-2 - Meeting with Petitioners 5 . BIDS , K. Kiwanis Tot Lot No. 4 - Phase I 6. CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS 7 . REPORTS S . ADJOURNMENT NOTE: A copy of the full agenda packet is avalable for perusal in the City Clerk's Office and the Kent Library. An explanation of the agenda format is given on the back of this page. Any person requiring a disability accommodation should contact the City in advance for more information. For TDD relay service call 1-800-635-9993 or the City of Kent(206) 854-6587. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Citizens wishing to address the Council will, at this time, make known the subject of interest, so all may be properly heard. A. Regional Justice Center Update B. Norway Sister City Presentation C. Proclamation - Constitution Week D. Proclamation - Day of Concern for the Hungry E. Proclamation - National Payroll Week Kent City Council Meeting Date_ September 17 , 1996 Category Public Hearincrs 1. SUBJECT: 1997-2002 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: This is the second public hearing on the City' s 1997-2002 Capital Facility Plan. The public is encouraged to provide input on capital projects needed during the next six years. Before the hearing is opened May Miller, Finance Director, will give a brief presentation. 3 . EXHIBITS: Memo from May Miller and worksheets 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Operations Committee (3-0) (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: OPEN HEARING: PUBLIC INPUT: CLOSE HEARING: ,r' 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds to close the public hearing. DISCUSSION: ACTION• Council Agenda Item No. 2A CITY OF1�J Jim White, Mayor TO: Mayor Jim White Councilmembers FROM: May Miller, Director of Finance DATE: September 12. 1996 SUBJECT: 1997-2002 CAPITAL FACILITY PLAN PUBLIC HEARING Attached are the graphs and financial worksheets on Kent's Capital Facilin- Plan for the next six years. The plan includes capital needs for all of the City's capital facilities and infrastructure. including transportation, water. sewer, drainage, parks. public safety, and general government. The S181,407,000 total includes S113.245,000 for public works projects. primarily the cast/west corridors. The Capital Facility Plan is a portion of the City's Comprehensive Plan which can be updated annually to maintain concurrence with land use and transportation according to the state's Growth Management Act. This year is especially important as we plan for growth due to the Meridian Annexation that took effect January 1, 1996. Cities are required to show not only the expenditures necessary to accommodate growth, but more importantly to show that the funds are available to support the projects. This plan shows both revenue and expenditures and is in balance with the exception of the transportation portion. This area has been in a deficit position the last two years because the utility tax has a sunset expiration in 2000. two years before the required projects end. The Public Works Committee will review this section and make a recommendation before the plan is adopted. The Operations Committee has reviewed the plan and recommended it to be forwarded in the process. This year's amended plan has been forwarded to the Planning Commission who will also hold a public hearing in October or November. After this hearing, the plan will be submitted to Council for approval: the 1997 portion will then be included in the City's 1997 Budget. 22l14ih AVE SO- /KENT-0.A AS H IN CTON 98077-SM95/TELEPHONE f206f859-3If10/FAXaX59-�,34 City of Kent Council Workshop 1997 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN August 20th, 1996 CITY OF KENT CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN In Thousands REVENUES BY SOURCE 1997 - 2002 CIP Revenues 10.457 5.8% Golf&Utilitp Fees 24,996 13.8% Sale of Property/Misc 2.649 1.5% Transportation 23509 13.0% LIDS 15,693 8.6% Bonds&Grants 104,103 57.3% TOTAL REVENUE: S181,407 EXPENDITURES 1997 - 2002 General Govt 19,239 10.6% Parks Voted Bonds 31,200 17.2% Parks&Recreation 11,760 6.5% Public Safety 5,963 3.30/0 Public Works 113,24) 62.40/6 TOTAL EXPENDITURES: $181,407 BE 97SUMM3.WBI 10-Sep-96 CITY OF KENT CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN STREET FUND 1997 - 2002 REVENUES BY SOURCE Undetermined 1,299 4.6% Begin Fund Balance 3,676 1 3.0% Fuel Taxes 8,543 30.2% Sale of Property 1,000 3.5% Interest Income 1,037 3.7% Motor Veh Reg Fee 2,801 10.0% Utility Taxes 9,897 35.0% TOTAL REVENUES: $28,254 STREET FUND 1997 - 2002 EXPENDITURES Debt Service 2,538 9.0% Other Improvements 5,969 21.1% Street Utility Oper 2,208 7.8% Intersections 274 1.0% Arterials 1,853 6.6% III Corridors 15,412 54.5% TOTAL EXPENDITURES: S28,254 BE 97SUMM3.WB1 10-Sep-96 CITY OF KENT CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 1997 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND ALL EXPENDITURES BY DEPARTMENT Public Safety 839,310 21.6% 1 � General Govt 1,147,842 29.5% Parks Department 1,898,842 48.9% TOTAL CIP EXPENDITURES: S3,885,994 BE 97SUMM3.WB1 10-Sep-96 1997 - 2002 CAPITAL FACILI"TIES PLAN PROJECT SUMMARY (In Thousands) 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 Total FUNDING SOURCES 1,657 1J99 1.925 1,238 2.717 1,321 10457 Street Fund Revenues 3,756 2,609 5,848 2.876 5.402 3.017 23.509 Water Utilitv Revenues 1.306 2,125 375 286 897 1,184 6,173 Sewer Utilit y Revenues 2,811 1.259 89 281 291 303 5.034 Drainage L'tiliry _ Revenues 4.679 _._09 414 949 460 478 12.989 Bonds 8.000 13.500 44200 65,700 Grants 15,260 5.813 7.488 1,313 1.249 2,150 33,274 LIDS 2,098 SJ09 5486 15,693 L050 1,779 600 700 5,1'_9 }:ins County Bond Issue 1,500 Sale of Property 1,000 1500 - I Q Miscellaneous Revenues 144 5 Riverbend Capital Acct 100 150 350 800 TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES 41,861 41,858 70.576 7,643 11,016 8,453 18I 407 CAPITAL PROJECTS NON UTILITY PROJECTS TRANSPORTATION Corridors 13,393 13,529 13,163 3,085 5479 1,180 49,828 Arterials 3,188 1863 5,962 108 109 2,457 14,687 Intersection Improvements 53 350 149 554 Other Improvements 1,275 1,030 757 848 879 1,530 6319 SUBTOTAL TRANSPORTATION 17911 17,771 19,883 4,189 6,467 5,167 71389 PUBLIC SAFETY Correctional Facility 118 25 143 Fire and Emergency Services 2,985 601 721 521 496 496 5.820 Police/Fire Training Center Police Administrative Offices _ SUBTOTAL PUBLIC SAFETY 3,103 626 721 521 496 496 5,963 PARKS AND RECREATION Neighborhood Park Rec Land Community Par Rec Land 1200 I._'00 k Neighborhood Rec Facilities 1,185 495 735 910 210 210 3.745 Community Rec Facilities 1.069 4,937 30.220 295 479 295 37,215 Golf Courses 100 350 350 800 SUBTOTAL PARKS AND RECREATION' 2,354 5,702 32.505 1,205 689 505 42,960 GENERAL GOVERNMENT Information Services/Automation 6,000 6,000 Government Facilities-Buildings/Mtc 2,310 150 8.290 150 1,650 250 12.800 Other 127 55 59 62 66 70 439 SUBTOTAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT 8437 205 8,349 212 1,716 320 19,239 TOTAL NON UTILITY PROJECTS 31,905 24304 61,458 6,127 9.368 6,488 139.551 UTILITY PROJECTS Sanitary Sewer 2,811 1,259 5.589 281 291 303 10,534 StormwaterManagement 5,939 4,669 3,154 949 460 478 15.649 Water Supply R Distribution 1,306 11,625 375 286 897 1,184 15.673 TOTAL UTILITY PROJECTS 10.056 17,553 9,118 1516 1,648 1,965 41,856 TOTAL CAPITAL PROJECTS 41,861 41.858 70,576 7,643 11,016 8,453 181,407 BE 97SUMM3.WBI 10-Sep-96 CITY OF KENT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 1997-2002 CAPITAL FACILITIES PL\N FORECAST (DOII.o m Thom..dr) pint lint 1999 I000 20. SOOI TOTAL. Sourceaaf FunJinB :pip ISl6 I.]3] '0J9 2.-51 1.670 12.144 Nen CIP Avulable for Cnpnal Flo—s 12]110 Voted 00 Bona 1..... "'-""' KC Bond larue-P.rkS 1050 I'll LOA ]Op $.I E9 Grnd/DO..tiOns 2997 305 1B6 3,486 S.le I'land Pinks 1.500 t SOLO ILIOL .from GO B." 8.000 6Uq Ii COO Seined Arsns Police S0 Tout Source of Funding Ii,ISI 6.16E al[19> :,119 :iJS :610 69,Ia9 C.,.,.[Pra3erl E.pendilu rn Ftre..d EMS Srrv:ees CIP Fundin8 iW 2.0&0 ReDl.remem FIK E9ulPmrm Ip0 I00 i00 iM iw al]p Replacement Foe E9uipmenr IW 'Of" IW Breathing Apparatus Cylinder Replicemcm, 25 25 Four Trdler Repl.cement 35 35 Replacement Radio E9u,mem 21 53 Si 53 53 5] 290 Appv.tus Hoist Bp 80 Sed mB App..1-RePlacemcni aJ aJ iJ iJ iJ 115 Tr.ITtc Comrol for Emergency Rnpomc 2tw 200 Grant 2.500 Lrvc Burn Simulanors 2 500 - Tout Fire end EMS Servicn —985 .1 S:I i96 i9ti 5,8I0 Pohre D.mrlri CIP Funding 28 ConeciuI3-Tr.naPOn Van t8 25 Spece Stud,(Cod Brneftt kmso iap -- Sauce Asaetr y0 n FF15-Awpm.tm Fmgcryrmting 9C Toni Polire DLp.rtment its 15 li3 Fier DeP.rlment CIP Funding 30 25 20 20 20 20 155 S18naBe(V umus Pdks) Playground Safny/Rest Reduction/Eci Pl.y Equip 75 75 ISO lw POO IW 600 MOIL-,I Enyineerr.,r COneulnni i TOT 60 60 60 60 6O 60 J60 Munn Plans 72 72 R.deft Road Path Drmn.g[System =w 200 TuIHl Patkmg lmpr...mems 50 - 25 25 25 23 25 Ili Path lmprovemmH l De.elopmem(V....,Parks) II30 100 1, SOLO 300 300 1200 Patting lm Pro.emems 50 50 Briefer Htdor:cal H9me Renov.Oom 50 50 Val"GO Bonds Performing Ana Center 31200 J 1 2110 King County Bond. Garrison C rack Renantion(1998-CIP Funds) SOO SO 681 Sch Aiee H,Is TOeI I Pork Development 200 200 Chnmun Ridge Developmenn 250 250 Lind.Heuhts K........ SW 300 Soccer Field Rn9yattans-Ilusseil Road,Glenn N<Dcn 300 30O Ent Hill 5'outh Spores Facility 2!79 2!>9 132od Suen Pvk Renavuron 640 60O Wnn Hill Neigneamood Patk Development 700 700 Grind I D...tion Kent Memorial P.rk Rnovatmn. 67 5 13 Eau Hill Pvk(M9rrJD Eapnsion SOLO 3W Neely H tdoncal HouK (ling CIP Funds) 130 ILA 230 Lake Fem-ek Perk Development SOLO 100 Riverview Park Development 18i I8a Sale of Lend Valley Floor I Green Raver nnhw.,COL 1 500 I.$1%I Taut Park D....meni 2,254 5351 J2.155 1205 689 505 42,160 G.ner.l Gaver rases, Irfrem.lis.Si ALL om.ILL. Proceed,ernes GO III Teleposenc 5yatem UDBradn 1 000 000 Compmer Sync,Ha duure sod M,.Related 5 000 _ S 000 TOW lnforndfio.Servicn/wutonna. 6 LOW 6� Go.ernment F.cdcin-Bindings I M.im....is Cl P FusmnB Emergency Fiti Repmd 100 ISO 150 150 ISO I50 850 Fumetud 60 60 Addttmnal Fardny R[pdrr, lop IW Remodel Pnhm Admmmru:pn Office, 50 50 Kim...le Elttdmg Matmem.nu Frnlrty 0a. SAO Connnan.Fred,-Eapnnon 1 SOLO I SOLO Cemenntil Building Carper Replacement lOO W Proceeds from GO Bend, <..Eut Hell Facdny land iM BuJJtng: 2 D00 I FOU B DD) Vndd GO Bonds Prppre,on East Htll Fire Sdtian 15IX, 500 Tent Go.nmm-t Freddie,-B..1dingil M.:mnnce 2210 I50 82w 150 1650 250 12800 Gmo.I Gmonmea.-Omer CIP Fu din, Update Kenn tarring C90e 75 l5 TO..'Gener.l Go.nnne.t-DO- 75 )S Ti Genres,G..esnment 1.385 ISO 8.2% 150 1650 250 18.375 Ti C.p.dl Prole,E.p..mtu.n IJ,Ia: 6.129 41.160 1876 3135 1251 sal Re..nueo.eru.Jerl Er,mil urn e13 12 (l91 S63 (400) I!19 BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 537 952 994 905 1,168 1,368 ENDING FUND BALANCE Unrexrved 265 292 208 1 DOS 660 1073 Reserved for Grnt Mnchrny ISO 150 150 ISO 150 im Reserved for Gapllal Eapendrues•• 517 542 548 553 559 SW ENDING FUND BALANCE 952 9B1 9LO5 116E 1,3" :788 • Protect apmwed,out on hold until d aFG-cr.1 Fund n demirmmed r'Incre.K R[Krved toe Capful E.penduluref CITY OF KENT STREET FUND 1997-2002 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN FORECAST (Dalian in Thousands) 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 ' Revenues Fuel Tax-Unrestricted 933 948 954 980 99'_ I,005 Fuel Tax-Arterial 436 413 450 459 464 470 Motor Vehicle Registration Fee 449 456 464 471 477 484 Water Utility Tax 66 67 83 84 85 22 Sewer Utility Tax 132 134 'u6 139 141 36 Drainage Utility Tax 69 79 80 82 83 21 Electric Utility Tax 753 789 E26 865 902 235 Gas Utility Tax 149 156 164 Ill 179 47 Telephone Utility Tax 433 454 475 497 519 135 Garbage Utility Tax 105 110 115 121 126 33 Interest Income 204 166 _ 166 166 166 167 Total Revenues 3,730 3.804 3924 4,034 4,134 2,654 Expenditures Debt Service 218 221 21, 201 198 200 Debt Service-92&93 Refunding of 89 GO Bonds 246 248 245 182 183 179 Street Utility Operations 341 352 _ 62 373 384 396 Total Expenditures 805 820 824 756 766 774 Net Available for Capital Projects 2,925 2983 3.:00 3.278 3,368 1,879 Sources of Funding Net Available for Capital Projects 2.925 1_.983 3,100 3,278 3,368 1,879 Sale of Property 1,000 _- Total Sources of Funding 3,925 2,983 3.100 3,278 3368 1,879 Capital Project Requests Corridors 196th Street West 47 1,286 196th Street Middle 1449 1 913 1,771 272nd Corridor 930 2.422 4,414 739 441 228th Street Corridor I c 771 4,414 1,180 Total Corridor 2,426 1,286 4,335 , Arterials 109 657 West Meeker Widening 108 72nd Avenue Extension 194 SE 256th Improvements(116th-132nd) 223 262 2121h Street Pavement Rehabilitation 300 Total Arterials 223 756 108 109 657 Intersection Improvements Military Road Improvements 149 _ James&Central Right Tom Lane 70 42nd&Reith Road Pecieslrial Signal 55 Total Intersection Improvements 55 70 149 Other Improvements Canyon Drive Sidewalk Bike Lanes 408 268 0 South Central Pavement Rehabilitation 300 Sidewalk Rehabilitation 300 300 300 300 300 30 Bike Paths 100 100 100 100 Miscellaneous Asphalt Overlays 337 347 357 368 379 390 Kent Shuttle Service 60 Street Lighting Wiring Upgrades 60 60 Traffic Signal Operational I Safety Improvements 30 42nd Avenue South Reconstruction 75 Road and Railroad Separation Study 100 Traffic Signal Controller Cabinet Replacements 40 40 20 40 40 Total Other Improvements 1,275 1,030 757 848 879 L186 Total Street Fund Requests 3,756 2,609 5.848 2,876 5,402 3,017 Revenues over(under)Expenditures (831) 374 (2,749) 402 (2,034) (1,138) BEGINNING FUND BALANCE Unrestricted 223 755 533 669 601 664 Restricted 119 416 494 49 257 473 Street Utility 221 3,237 3,756 1.315 1,577 (735) Corridor Improvement Balance Available 3,676 BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 4.240 4,408 4.783 2,034 2,435 402 ENDING FUND BALANCE Unrestricted 755 533 669 601 664 438 Restricted 416 494 49 257 473 144 Suect Utility 3.23' 3,756 _ 1.315 1,577 (735) (1.318 ENDING FUND BALANCE 4408 4.783 2034 2435 402 (736) ' Assumes that the 1%interim utility taxes will be discontinued on April 7,2002 per Ordinance 93274. DE FORECST2.WB1 10-Scp-96 CITY OF KENT SEWERAGE FUND 1997 -2002 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN FORECAST (Dollars in Thousands) 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 Operating Revenue 17.410 18A10 19.121 19.713 20,131 20.655 Operating Expenses 13.462 13.831 14.709 15,479 16,021 16.582 Operating Income(Loss) 3.947 4.579 4.412 4,234 4,111 4.073 Other Financial Sources Miscellaneous Revenue 37 37 37 37 37 37 Interest Income 536 536 472 536 536 536 Total Other Financial Sources 574 574 510 574 574 574 Net Available for Debt Service 4.521 5.151 4,922 4.808 4,684 4.647 Existing Debt Service 1.677 1.730 1.722 1.726 1,726 1.720 New Bonded Debt- 1998 618 897 897 897 897 Total Debt Service 1.677 2.:48 2.618 2.622 2.623 2,617 Net Available for Capital Projects 2.844 2,805 2304 2.186 2,061 2.030 Sources of Funding Net Available for Capital Projects 2.844 2,805 2.304 2,186 2.061 2.030 Grants 1.500 Proceeds from Bond Sale 9.500 Total Sources of Funding 4344 12.305 2304 2.186 2.061 2.030 Capital Project Requests Sanitary Sewer Miscellaneous Sewer Lines 250 260 270 281 291 303 East Hill Interceptor 2.533 983 5.319 Control Center Update 10 16 Utility Operations Management System 7 GIS Software Conversion 11 Total Sanitary Sewer 2.811 1259 5.589 281 291 303 Stormwater Management Miscellaneous Storm Drainage Improvements 393 409 425 442 460 478 Mill Creek Flood/Erosion Control Facilities E500 Mill Creek(Auburn) /Mullen Slough Flood Control 120 Stream Restoration/Streamside Tree Planting 47 3rd Avenue Trunk System Construction 280 Valley Detention System Improvements 2.830 - Horseshoe Acres Storm Pump Station 280 Outfall Treatment Facilities 2097. L669 507 Vactor Waste Handling Facility 500 Drainage in Concert with Road Improvements 240 1 540 1,060 Soos Creek Comprehensive Drainage Plan 200 Control Center Update 10 16 Utility Operations Management System 7 GIS Software Conversion 19 GIS Database Expansion 95 Overlay Parking Lot and Driveways at Earthworks 25 Total Stormwater Management 5.939 4.669 3.154 949 460 478 Total Capital Project Requests 8.750 5,928 8.743 1,230 751 781 Revenue over(under)Expenditures (4.406) 6.377 (6,439) 956 1,310 1.249 Beginning Working Capital 6.520 2.114 8,490 2.051 3,007 4317 Ending Working Capital Unreserved 1,554 7,752 1.133 1.909 3.219 4,469 Reserved 559 739 918 1,097 1.097 L097 Total Ending Working Capital 2.114 8,490 2.051 1007 4,317 5,566 BE FORECST2.WB1 10-Sep-96 CITY OF KENT WATER SUPPLY AND DISTRIBUTION 1997 -2002 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN FORECAST (Dollars in Thousands) 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 Operating Revenue Sales 5.894 5,991 7369 7.490 7,586 7.683 Miscellaneous Revenue 60 61 62 63 64 65 Total Operating Revenue 5.954 6.052 7.431 7,553 7.650 7.748 Operating Expenses 4,283 4.484 4.695 4.916 5.128 5.350 Operating Income(Loss) 1.671 L568 2.736 2,638 2.522 2.398 Other Financial Sources Interest Income L000 500 175 100 100 100 System Development Fees 325 325 325 325 325 325 Connection Charges/Charges in Lieu of Assessment 55 » 55 55 5 55 Miscellaneous Revenue a 4 4 a a a Total Other Financial Sources 1.384 884 559 484 484 484 Net Available for Debt Service 3.055 2.452 3,294 3,121 3,006 2,882 Existing Debt Service 1.390 1398 1,395 1389 1.390 1,333 New Bonded Debt- 1998 342 924 924 924 924 Total Debt Service 1390 1.740 2,318 2313 2.3li 2257 Net Available for Capital Projects 1.664 711 976 809 693 626 Sources of Funding Net Available for Capital Projects 1.664 711 976 809 693 62 Proceeds from Bond Sale 9.500 Total Sources of Funding 1.664 10,211 976 809 693 626 Capital Project Requests Tacoma Intertie 10,300800 Impoundment Project(1242h- 116th/288th-304th) 332 138 649 155 Miscellaneous Watermain Replacements (Capacity) ]27 132 138 la3 lag li5 Additional Water Source Development 300 Soos Creek Well Improvements 350 80 Miscellaneous Watermain Replacements (Non-Capacity) 127 132 137 143 148 li4 124th Avenue Water Tank Painting 275 Clark Springs Source Improvements 50 Water Comprehensive Plan Update 50 7� Control Center Update 30 48 Utility Operations Management System 71 GIS Software Conversion 26 Total Capital Project Requests 1.306 11.625 375 286 897 1.184 Revenue over(under)Expenditures 358 1,414) 601 523 (204) (558) Beginning Working Capital 2.964 3.322 1.909 2,510 3,032 2.828 Ending Working Capital Unreserved 2,037 441 862 1.200 863 1.040 Reserved 1.286 1.467 1.647 1.832 1.965 1•'-'0 Total Ending Working Capital 3,322 1.909 2,510 3,032 2.828 2.269 BE FORECST2.WB1 10-Sep-96 Current & Future Bond Issues Bond Issue Purpose 1995 1996* 1997* 1998* 1999* COUNCILMANIC (LTGO) Gen. Gov't Centennial Buildino Purchase 11,843,000 F Gen. Gov't Telephone 1,000,000 Gen. Gov't Computers 5,000,000 f Gen. Gov't Parks Land Acquisition 3,7U,000 Gen. Gov't Public Safety, Public Works,Gen. Gov't, 2,000.000 6,000,000 Parks, East Hill Annex.Land R Bldgs. Street 272nd Corridor Street 240th Project 1,715.000 Sewerage Citywide Drainage CIP Needs 8 200,000 Golf Refunding/DR/Mini-Putt/l8 Hole 5.420 000 Sub-Total 5,420,000 25,543.000 8,000,000 6,000,000 VOTED Parks Performing Arts Center 30,000,000 REVENUE Water Refundina/Tacoma Intertie 7,765,000 9,500,000 Sewerage Citywide Drainage CIP Needs 4,000.000 METRO Interne 5,500.000 TOTAL. $13,185,000 $25,543,000 $8,000,000 $49,000,000 $6,000.000 *Amounts do not include debt issuance or bond insurance costs. Igd/96/miswbnd95-99 12 1997 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN UPDATE LEADERSHIP TEAM MEETING 4/8/96 Finance provides: Current Inventory per City of Kent Comprehensive Plan Current 1996 CFP plan project list Current 1996 - 2001 detail pages (spreadsheet files available) Sample of 1997 detail page template to Departments WORKSHOP FOR PREPARATION STAFF APRIL 22 2:00 - 3:30 PM CHAMBERS EAST DEPARTMENT UPDATES 4/22 - 6/17 Departments update individual Comp Plans (such as Parks) Departments update capital facilities inventory (including Meridian Annexation and any other additions) Departments update fixed asset records Departments update and prioritize project requests through 2002 Identify changes from old 1996-2001 list to new 1997-2002 Update summary of project requests FINANCE PREPARES 1997 PRELIMINARY FORECAST 5/15 ADMINISTRATION PROPOSES PROJECTS 6/17 - 7/31 Finance and Administration Departments balance to preliminary forecast and calculate Levels of Service COUNCIL WORKSHOP CAPITAL FACILITY PLAN 8/20/96 Submit projects, funding and debt issuance timing to City Council and public Balanced 1997 Projects Forwarded to Planning 8/31 PUBLIC HEARINGS - CAPITAL FACILITY PLAN 9/17 ADOPT COMP PLAN AND/OR CHANGE ORDINANCE OCT/NOV 13 �14 Kent City Council Meeting Date September 17 , 1996 Category Public Hearings 1. SUBJECT: 1997 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) PROGRAM 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: This date has been set for a public hearing to consider adoption of the proposed 1997 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program, including the contingency plans for estimated entitlement changes, as recommended by the Planning Committee. 3 . EXHIBITS: Staff memo, proposed 1997 CDBG Program Funding Levels, 1997 CDBG Staff Analysis, Planning Committee minutes of 9/3/96 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Planning Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: OPEN HEARING: PUBLIC INPUT• CLOSE HEARING: 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember -1 % tct'" seconds to adopt the 1997 CDBG program, including the contingency plans for estimated entitlement changes, as recommended by the Planning Committee. DISCUSSION• ACTION• Council Agenda Item No. 2B CITY OF '��`)J� i Jim White, Mayor r,••7 a Planning Department (206) 859-3390/FAX (206) 850-2544 James P. Harris, Planning Director MEMORANDUM September 17, 1996 MEMO TO: MAYOR JIM W HITE AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: CAROLYN SUNDVALL, HUMAN SERVICES PLANNER SUBJECT: 1997 PROPOSED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) PROGRAM Attached is the proposed 1997 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program for the City of Kent. The total proposed program is estimated at $576,263. This is a 32 percent ($139,713) increase from our 1996 CDBG funding level of $436,550. This increase in funding has resulted in the City being able to fund all of the capital requests and to award the Parks Department, Tot Lot project an additional $26,294 to accommodate ADA improvements and other amenities such as picnic tables, walkways and improved play equipment. Kent received Public Service CDBG funding requests exceeding by over $68,462 the CDBG dollars available. A description of each program requesting Kent's CDBG funds and the rationale for the recommended funding is attached for your review. The Human Services Commission reviewed the CDBG human (public) service applications. The attached proposal includes the Commission's funding recommendations for those human services programs. As in past years, the majority of the CDBG funds are recommended to support the City's Home Repair Services Program. This program continues to serve many low income, disabled and senior homeowners in Kent by providing needed repairs. The program also guarantees that some of Kent's low and moderate income housing stock is maintained and preserved. Home Repair's summer painting program has also been recommended for funding this year. Keep in mind that Kent's CDBG entitlement figure of $576,263 for 1997 is an estimate. The amount of money we receive could change depending upon the final federal appropriations bill Congress passes in the Fall. Therefore, the recommended funding includes a contingency plan to address any potential entitlement changes that may occur when Congress adopts the 1997 budget. Kent's adopted 1997 CDBG Program must include such a contingency plan and be forwarded to King County by September 30, 1996. 1204111 nA l:.sly i hr:N'r.WASHINUT-ON')xn02-;no;i TIAliPnONP (20o)S59-7300/FAX It 459-1334 1997 CDBG Program September 17, 1996 Page 2 On September 3, 1996, the Planning Committee approved the attached proposed 1997 CDBG Program and its Contingency Plan. Recommended Actions 1. Approve the proposed 1997 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program, including its contingency plan. C S/mp:u:\doc\\council\cdbgpro cc: James P. Harris, Planning Director Lin Houston, Human Services Manager Fred Satterstrom, Acting Planning Director PROPOSED CITY OF KENT 1997 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) PROGRAM Capital Funds $436,586 Planning & Administration Funds 65,428 Public (Human) Services Funds 74,249 Total CDBG Funds: $5767263 CAPITAL Requested Recommended City of Kent S230,096 $230,096 Home Repair Services Prg City of Kent, Parks & Rec. 70,000 96,294 Renovate Park- Tot Lot 44 (Phase 11) Easter Seals of Washington 18,250 18,250 Access Modification Rehab King County Housing Authority 50,000 50,000 Nike Residential Rehab Mental Health Housing Foundation 16,774 16,774 Buccheit Gardens Acquisition Mental Health Housing Foundation 10,172 10,172 Tall Firs Rehab United Cerebral Palsy 15.000 15.000 Acquisition Total Capital S410,292 S4367586 PLANNING & ADMINISTRATION S 65,428 S 65,428 CONTINGENCY PLAN FOR INCREASE & DECREASE OF CAPITAL FUNDS If Kent's CDBG Capital dollars increase from the current estimate then any additional dollars would be carried over into the 1998 program year. If Kent's CDBG Capital Dollars decrease from the current estimate then: 1 st The City of Kent Parks Dept. Tot Lot Phase II would be decreased up to S26,000. 2nd Any additional decrease would be split proportionately among the remaining projects. PUBLIC (HUMAN) SERVICES Requested Recommended Catholic Community Services $ 25,000 $10,000 Springwood Food Bank Community Health Centers of 25,000 18,555 King County, Kent Clinic Connection, Adult Day Care 5,000 5,000 Elderhealth NW Emergency Feeding Program 10,132 10,132 of Seattle-King County Episcopal Diocese of Olympia 14,000 -0- Refugee Employee King County Sexual Assault Resource Center 5,000 -0- Legal Advocacy for Children Visiting Nurse Services 26,279 -0- Community Nursing Clinic YWCA of Seattle-King County 32.300 30.562 Domestic Violence Housing Total Public (Human) Service $142,711 S747249 CONTINGENCY PLAN FOR INCREASE & DECREASE OF PUBLIC (HUMAN) SERVICE FUNDS If Kent's CDBG Public (Human) Service dollars increase from the current estimate then: 1st The increase will be split between the Community Health Centers of King County & the YWCA, up to their requested amounts. 2nd In the event that the increase exceeds this amount, then any additional increase would fund Community Health Center of King County Primary Dental Program up to the 1997 General Fund request. If Kent's CDBG (Public) Human Service dollars decrease from the current estimate then: 1 st The decrease will be split evenly between the Community Health Centers of King County & the YWCA, to the 1996 funding level. 2nd If the decrease is more than that amount, the Emergency Feeding program would be reduced to the 1996 funding level. 3rd Any additional decreases will be split evenly among all the agencies with the exception of Connections, as they are funded at the minimum level of$5,000. PROPOSED CITY OF KENT 1997 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM STAFF ANALYSIS CAPITAL, PROJECTS 1. CITY OF KENT HOME REPAIR SERVICES PROGRAM Amount Requested: S230,096 Program Summary: The City's Housing Repair Service Program provides major and minor repairs to income eligible owner-occupied housing located within the City of Kent. The proposed program this year includes the summer painting program and three new temporary painter positions. The CDBG funds will pay the salaries of our home repair staff(who do the actual minor repairs and administration of the program), a temporary summer painting crew, supplies for minor repairs, vehicle rental, contractor fees for our major repairs, and miscellaneous administrative fees. Local and Consortium Policies and Priorities: The proposed project complies with all local and consortium policies. Staff Funding Recommendation: S230,096 If the City receives a decrease in its CDBG capital funds, then City of Kent Parks Dept. Tot Lot Phase II would be decreased up to $26,000. Any additional decrease would be split proportionately among the remaining projects. Rationale: The City should continue its commitment to the Housing Repair Services Program which has operated in the City since 1975 when the Federal CDBG program began. The program serves 100% low and moderate income Kent residents. Many of the clients are seniors or disabled persons; the program helps these people remain in their homes and helps to maintain and preserve Kent's housing stock. 2. CITY OF KENT'S PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT: Kiwanis Tot Lot 94 Phase II Rehabilitation (at 5th and Crow St.) Amount Requested: $70,000 Program Summary: This proposed funding would be used to rehabilitate an existing park in a low and moderate income neighborhood. Old outdated play equipment will be replaced with a new large play structure, ground material, and border. Picnic Tables, walkways and drinking fountains will also be added. 1 PROPOSED CITY OF KENT 1997 CDBG PROGRAM August 26, 1996 Local and Consortium Policies and Priorities: The proposed project complies with all local and consortium policies. Staff Funding Recommendation: 596,294 The capital funds allocations had a balance of$26,294 that was applied to this Project. Originally the Tot Lot project was scaled back due to lack of funds. Funding at the increased level will allow for an inclusion of amenities such as expanded play equipment, picnic tables and walkways. However, if the City receives a decrease in its CDBG capital funds,then City of Kent Parks Dept. Tot Lot Phase II would be decreased up to $26,000. Any additional decrease would be split proportionately among the remaining projects. Rationale: Our neighborhood parks in low income areas should look no different from and be no less accessible than parks in the more affluent areas. Unfortunately, the park this proposal is for has become run down. The funds would remedy that situation. In addition, the park would be handicap accessible, allowing physically challenged children to enjoy playground activities and lead a more normal life. 3. EASTER SEALS OF WASIIINGTON-Modifications to rentals for the physically challenged Amount Requested: 518,250 Program Summary: This project provides access modifications to allow handicapped accessibility in rental units in Kent. Specifically, access ramps, roll-in showers, grab bars, widening interior doors, wall hung sinks, and raised toilets are proposed. Requested funds would also pay fora portion of the Project Manager's salary and administrative costs. Local and Consortium Policies and Priorities: The proposed project complies with all local and consortium policies. Staff Funding Recommendation: 518,250 If the City receives a decrease in its CDBG capital funds, then City of Kent Parks Dept. Tot Lot Phase II would be decreased up to 526,000. Any additional decrease would be split proportionately among the remaining projects. Rationale: This project serves physically challenged residents of Kent residing in rental units. This program supplements the City's Housing Repair Services Program since the City's program only serves owner-occupied units, not rentals. The project specifically addresses a City of Kent local program priority to provide access modification for physically challenged persons. PROPOSED CITY OF KENT 1997 CDBG PROGRAM August 26, 1996 4. KING COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY - Nike Residential Rehab: Amount Requested: S50,000 Program Summary: The Nike site, which was given to the King County Housing Authority, consists of 31 surplus military single family housing units which has been providing emergency shelter and transitional housing with support services since 1990. This project is located on the West Hill in Kent. The King County Housing Authority leases units to the South King County Multi-Service Center. Highline West Seattle Mental Health Center and St. Stephens Housing Association. The population served consists of homeless women, children, families and mentally challenged seniors. The request is for partial funding of Phase II which will pay for Health & Safety items such as exterior lighting, repair of asphalt, site restoration. replacement of kitchen cabinets and repair of floor coverings. Local and Consortium Policies and Priorities: The proposed project complies with all local and consortium policies. Staff Funding Recommendation: S50,000 If the City receives a decrease in its CDBG capital funds, then City of Kent Parks Dept. Tot Lot Phase II would be decreased up to $26,000. Any additional decrease would be split proportionately among the remaining projects. Rationale: This housing serves a vital and under-served need for emergency and transitional housing in Kent. Except for the roof, there has not been a major rehab of the units since it was built in 1958. Kent funds will help provide a safer and healthier environment for the homeless and mentally challenged seniors. 5. l'IENTAL HEALTH HOUSING FOUNDATION - Buccheit Gardens Apartments Amount Requested: S16,774 Program Summary: Request is to partially fund the purchase of 8 to 10 units of housing for people who are mentally challenged. Agency is currently looking at apartment complexes in Auburn and Kent. Options are to acquire an older complex and rehab it to meet the clients needs or to purchase a mixed use building that would set aside 8 units for mental health and the rest of the units would be market rate. Local and Consortium Policies and Priorities: The proposed project complies with all local and consortium policies. PROPOSED CITY OF KENT 1997 CDBG PROGRAM August 26, 1996 Staff Funding Recommendation: S16,774 If the City receives a decrease in its CDBG capital funds, then City of Kent Parks Dept. Tot Lot Phase II would be decreased up to $26,000. Any additional decrease would be split proportionately among the remaining projects. Rationale: This housing serves a vital and under-served need for independent living situations for low income chronically mentally challenged adults. This project received $296,888 from the King County Housing Finance Program. Kent's grant is required as a local matching fund. 6. MENTAL HEALTH HOUSING FOUNDATION TALL FIRS REHAB Amount Requested: S10,172 Program Summary: Project is for the replacement of the roof and fencing at a home/minifarm dedicated to housing very low income chronically mentally challenged adults. Project is located within the Kent City limits and houses 5 clients. Local and Consortium Policies and Priorities: The proposed project complies with all local and consortium policies. Staff Funding Recommendation: S10,172 If the City receives a decrease in its CDBG capital funds, then City of Kent Parks Dept. Tot Lot Phase II would be decreased up to$26,000. Any additional decrease would be split proportionately among the remaining projects. Rationale: Mental Health Foundation purchased the home and 2 acres in 1993. Request is a small investment to ensure that housing will be maintained in a safe and secure environment for chronically mentally challenged adults.. 7. UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY - Community Living Homes Amount Requested: S15,000 Program Summary: Request is for partial funding for land acquisition to build permanent housing that would house 4 individuals that are developmentally challenged. Agency is currently looking for an in-fill lot in the Kent and Auburn area. King County HOF and HUD 811 Program will fund the construction of the home. Support services will be provided by the Dept. of Developmentally Disabled. Local and Consortium Policies and Priorities: The proposed project complies with all local and consortium policies. 4 PROPOSED CITY OF KENT 1997 CDBG PROGRAM August 26, 1996 Staff Funding Recommendation: S15,000 If the City receives a decrease in its CDBG capital funds, then City of Kent Parks Dept. Tot Lot Phase II would be decreased up to $26,000. Any additional decrease would be split proportionately among the remaining projects. Rationale: Funding will support subregional housing needs for people who have severe physical challenges. Clients will be referred from United Cerebral Palsy. FLANNLNG & ADMINISTRATION 8. CITY OF KENT PLANNING AND ADMINISTRATION (for the CDBG program) Amount Set Aside: S65,428 Program Summary: The planning and administration of the CDBG program involves a number of tasks such as contract development and monitoring, regional cooperation, and fulfilling the various federal reporting requirements. These dollars will continue to fund an existima permanent part-time planner position and a temporary intern position. Funds will also be used for general program administration costs which support Kent's CDBG program. Local and Consortium Policies and Priorities: The proposed project complies with all local and consortium policies. Staff Funding Recommendation: $65,428 Rationale: The Council has already taken action at their June 4, 1996 meeting to accept the maximum set aside for Planning and Administration CDBG dollars. That is estimated to be $65,428. We need this amount to be set aside for planning and administration, because Kent's general fund does not fully cover the staff time needed to administer and plan for the CDBG program. 5 PROPOSED CITY OF KENT 1997 CDBG PROGRAM August 26, 1996 PUBLIC (HUMAN) SERVICE 9. CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES - Springwood Foodbank Amount Requested: S25,000 Program Summary: Funding is for the support of an on-site food bank to provide emergency and supplementary food for residents of the Springwood Low Income Housing Complex located in the Meridian Annexation area_ Local and Consortium Policies and Priorities: The proposed project complies with all local and consortium policies. Human Service Commission Funding Recommendation: S10,000 If the City's CDBG Public Services funding levels change, this program may be decreased. For details refer to the last page. Rationale: Funding will help meet the basic and emergent food needs of the low income residents. The program has been funded by King County since 1989. Once the area was annexed into the City, King County funds became unavailable. Without support from the City, the program would not be able to operate. 10. COYIMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS OF KING COUNTY -Kent Clinic services. Amount Requested: S25,000 Program Summary: Funds will be used to help support the compensation of a physician, who will provide primary medical care to low and moderate income people at the Kent Clinic. Local and Consortium Policies and Priorities: The proposed project complies with all local and consortium policies. Human Service Commission Funding Recommendation: S18,555 If the City's CDBG Public Services funding levels change, this program may be increased or decreased. For details refer to the last page. 6 PROPOSED CITY OF KENT 1997 CDBG PROGRAM August 26, 1996 Rationale: Health care is a critical need in Kent_ The Kent Clinic is the major point of access to medical services for Kent's low income population. Access to basic medical services is limited to low and moderate income residents because of lack of insurance and the lack of medical providers who accept Medicaid or Medicare clients. This project addresses that need. 11. CONNECTION, ADULT DAY CARE (Elderhealth NW) Amount Requested: $5,000 Program Summary: Funds will be used to help off-set the costs of adult day health services for Kent residents who are frail, elderly or disabled who still live at home. Clients receive medical assessment. on-going health monitoring, meals, social & therapeutic activities. Caregivers and families are offered support, education and counseling. Local and Consortium Policies and Priorities: The proposed project complies with ail local and consortium policies. Human Service Commission Funding Recommendation: S5,000 This program was recommended for funding at the minimum allowable amount and will not be affected by the Contingency Plan. Rationale: This is a priority one level for funding. Program addresses the growing need for adult day health services for low income residents. 12. EMERGENCY FEEDING PROGRAM OF SEATTLE-KING COUNTY: Distribution of meal boxes Amount Requested: S10,132 Program Summary: The Emergencv Feeding Program provides emergency boxed meals for distribution at a number of sites in Kent. This Program differs from a food bank in that it provides nutritionally balanced meals for three days. Special meals are available for specific health concerns such as high blood pressure, low sodium diets, low sugar, and liquid diets. They also provide infant meal packs and food for the homeless that doesn't ne--d cooking. Local and Consortium Policies and Priorities: The proposed project complies with ail local and consortium policies.' Human Service Commission Funding Recommendation: S10,132 If the City's CDBG Public Services funding levels change, this program may be decreased. For details refer to the last page. 7 PROPOSED CITY OF KENT 1997 CDBG PROGRAM August 26, 1996 Rationale: The agency provides nutritionally balanced & special diet meals to individuals and families in crisis. The City of Kent began funding this agency four years ago. The agency has demonstrated to the City that it is providing a` it--1 service in a competent and efficient manner. 13. YWCA, DOMESTIC VIOLENCE TRANSITIONAL HOUSING Amount Requested: S32,200 Program Summary: Program provides emergency and transitional shelter along with support services for victims of Domestic Violence and their children. In 1997, the YWCA will continue to provide Kent victims of Domestic Violence with shelter in five units of transitional housing. Local and Consortium Policies and Priorities: The proposed project complies with all local and consortium policies. Human Service Commission Funding Recommendation: $30,562 If the Citv's CDBG Public Services funding levels change, this program inav be increased or decreased. For details refer to the last page. Rationale: The YWCA's program is the only transitional housing for domestic violence victims in South King County and is a vital service for Kent residents. This is one major component in the continuum of housing services needed to help victims move out of the cycle of violence. PUBLIC (HUMAN) SERVICES CONTINGENCY PLAN If Kent's CDBG Human Services dollars increase from the current estimate, then: 1st) The increase will be split between the Community Health Centers &the YWCA, up to their requested amounts. In the event that the increase exceeds this amount, then 2nd) any additional increase would fund Community Health Center of King County Primary Dental Program up to the 1997 General Fund request. If Kent's CDBG Human Service dollars decrease from the current estimate then: 1st) The decrease will be split evenly between the Community Health Centers of King County & the YWCA, up to the 1996 funding level and 2nd) if the decrease is more than that amount, the Emergency Feeding program would be reduced to the 1996 funding level. 3rd) Any additional decreases will be split evenly among all the agencies with the exception of Connections, as they are funded at the minimum level of$5,000. cs:\97cdbg\bgprg2.sum 8 CITY OF i Jim White, Mayor CITY COUNCIL PLANNING COMMITTEE MINUTES September '), 1996 Planning Committee Members Present: Citv Attornev's Office Leona Orr, Chair Tom Brubaker Tim Clark Laurie Evezich Jon Johnson Planning Staff Other City Staff Fred Satterstrom, Planning Manager Bill Wolinski, Public Works Matt Jackson, GIS Planner Lin Houston, Human Services Manager Carolyn Sundvall, Human Services Planner Margaret Porter, Administrative Assistant III Teresa Beener. Administrative Secretary Other Rodger Anderson, Seattle King Count- Association of Realtors 1997 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGR.kM(CDBG) -(L. Houston) Human Services Planner Carolyn Sundvall informed the Committee the total proposed 1997 CDBG program is estimated at S576,263 and explained the relevant contingency plans. This is a thirty-nvo percent(32%) increase (S139,713) from our 1996 CDBG funding level of S436,550. There are three portions to this program. The Capital funding portion is S436,586, the Planning & Administration funding portion is S65,428, and the Public (human) Services funding portion is S74,249. Staff recommended that the Planning Committee take the following action: 1. Approve the proposed 1997 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program, including its contingency plan, and forward for adoption to the full City Council. 2. Schedule a public hearing for September 17, 1996, for the full City Council to consider adoption of the proposed 1997 CDBG Program. Committee member Tim Clark confirmed the CDBG is Federal money that is allocated locally. He also questioned whether the capital funds allocated to the Mental Health Housing Foundation for the Buccheit Gardens Acquisition was a county-wide project. Planner Carolyn Sundvall explained that the City of Kent funding is a small portion in comparison and other cities have proposed funding for this project. _U 41h AV I .SO /ki..\I %\ \SI[IN(;I ON It.[ PPII U>P r unis;,i.raw FAX =%;a-;ill City Council Planning Committee Minutes September 3, 1996 Page 2 Clark asked for further clarification relating to the YWCA of Seattle-King County Domestic Violence Housing, Human Services Manager Lin Houston explained that the funds proposed would cover the rent of five units for one year and some support services. Committee member Tim Clark MOVED and Committee member Jon Johnson SECONDED the motion to accept staff recommendations. The motion carried. 9ZCA-96-4 STREAM BUFFER REOUIRENHENTS - (M. Jackson) Planner Matt Jackson presented the Committee with maps showing the entire Soos Creek Basin Planning Area and the City of Kent Soos Creek Basin Overlay. He explained that the Ordinance would govem potential annexation areas covered by the drainage basin once the areas were annexed into the City. Assistant City Attorney Tom Brubaker discussed some language changes recommended by the Public Works Department. The changes are as follows: 1. Page 1 - language amended to indicate the three major creeks and their unnamed tributaries. 2. Page 11 (Definitions) - Add language to the "small livestock" definition to further clarify the livestock densities, six (6) small livestock will be equivalent to one large livestock. 3. Page 19 - In regard to manure storage areas add the language "6) Manure shall not be piled within any stream buffer." Brubaker explained that these changes do not go beyond what exists in the current King County Stream Buffer Ordinance. Committee member Tim Clark clarified that this Ordinance would continue the protection that King County had in place. Brubaker confirmed that Kent's Ordinance would incorporate the same or slightly less restrictive buffer requirements that were in place in King County. Committee member Jon Johnson MOVED to send the Stream Buffer Ordinance with amended changes discussed today to the full City Council on the September 17th for adoption. The motion was SECONDED by Committee member Tim Clark. The motion carried. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 4:25 p.m. U ADOCTCO W NI INUTESTC00903.M IN CONSENT CALENDAR 3 . CitV Council Action: Councilmember �, !�v.:. moves Councilmember __ seconds that Consent Calendar Items A through J be approved. Discussion Action 3A. Approval of Minutes. Approval of the minutes of the regular council meeting of September 3 , 1996 . 3B. Approval of Bills. Approval of payment of the bills received through August 30 and paid on August 30, 1996, after auditing by the Operations Committee on September 4 , 1996. Approval of checks issued for vouchers: Date Check Numbers Amount 8/30/96 173038-173774 $2 , 761, 593 . 40 Approval of checks issued for payroll for August 16 through August 31 and paid on September 5, 1996 : Date Check Numbers Amount 9/5/96 Checks 214121-214461 $ 265, 430.22 9/5/96 Advices 37757-38210 $ 574 , 682 . 28 $ 840, 112 . 50 Council Agenda Item No. 3 A-B Kent, Washington September 3 , 1996 Regular meeting of the Kent City Council was called to order at 7 : 00 p.m. by Mayor White. Present: Councilmembers Bennett, Clark, Epperly, Houser, Johnson, Orr and Woods, Operations Director/Chief of Staff McFall, City Attorney Lubovich, Public Works Director Wickstrom, Parks Director Hodgson, Finance Director Miller, and Human Resources Director Viseth. Approxi- mately 15 people were at the meeting. PUBLIC Operations Director McFall added to the agenda COMMUNICATIONS an executive session related to litigation and property negotiations. Introduction of Mayor's Appointee. Mayor White introduced Brian Smith, his appointee to the Kent Library Board. Employee of the Month. The Mayor announced that Ken Chatwin, the City' s Risk Manager, has been selected as the Employee of the Month for September. He noted that Chatwin has developed a Risk Management Program, a Safety Award Program, and has saved the City thousands of dollars by establishing an insurance deductible program. Human Resources Director Viseth added that Chatwin is self-motivated and is respected by all employees. She said that he is very deserving and commended him for his accomplish- ments. The Employee of the Month plaque was then presented by the Mayor. Kent Area PTA Week. Mayor White read a proclama- tion declaring the week of September 15-21, 1996 , as Kent Area PTA Week in the City of Kent. He noted that PTA' s provide many services including school programs, equipment, books, and art supplies, as well as leadership and training, and urged all citizens to support the PTA in their efforts on behalf of children. Barbara McPherson, PTA Council President, thanked the Mayor and Council and noted that the Kent Area PTA has over 5, 000 members representing 33 PTA' s . She presented the Mayor with a copy of their Pledge to Children. CONSENT HOUSER MOVED that Consent Calendar Items A CALENDAR through M be approved. Orr seconded and the motion carried unanimously. 1 September 3 , 1996 MINUTES (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3A) Approval of Minutes. APPROVAL of the minutes of the August 20 , 1996 , Council meeting, the August 20, 1996, Council workshop, and a correction to page one of the minutes of the August 6, 1996 , Council meeting indicating that Operations Director/Chief of Staff McFall and City Attorney Lubovich were in attendance. WATER (BIDS - ITEM 5A) S.E. 240th Street Water Main Improvements and S. 212th Street Bridge Water Main Crossing. Bid opening for this project was held on August 14 , 1996 with 5 bids received. The low bid was sub- mitted by Frank Coluccio Construction, Seattle, in the amount of $196, 715 . 17 . The Engineer' s estimate was $176, 130 . 36 . The S. E. 240th Water Main Improvements consists of a water main installation extended in advance of the County' s 240th Street improvement project. The S. 212th Bridge Water Main Crossing completes the link in the rebuild of the water system in that area of Kent. It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director that the S.E. 240th Water Main Improvements and S. 212th Street Bridge Water Main Crossing contract be awarded to Frank Coluccio Construction for the bid amount of $196, 715 . 17 . CLARK SO MOVED. Woods seconded and the motion carried. STREETS (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3G) LID 330 - Segregation. ADOPTION of Resolution No. 1481 authorizing 10 segregations of Assessment #5 in LID 330 to accommodate the development of the property, as recommended by the Public Works Committee. These segregated properties will pay their designed share of the LID assessment. (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3H) LID 336 - Segregation. ADOPTION of Resolution No. 1482 authorizing the segregation of Assessment #50 in LID 336 to accommodate a boundary line adjustment, as recommended by the Public Works Committee. The segregated properties will pay their designated share of the LID assessment. 2 September 3 , 1996 TRAFFIC (PUBLIC HEARING - ITEM 2A) CONTROL 1997-2002 Six Year Transportation Improvement Plan. This date has been set for a public hearing and adoption of the 1997-2002 Six Year Transportation Improvement Plan. Public Works Director Wickstrom displayed a map showing the projects, and noted that the plan is not financially balanced. He explained that this is the program which is submitted when applying for grants. He noted that the total for the six year period is $193 , 000 , 000 , $100, 000, 000 of which is associated with railroad grade separa- tion crossings. He explained that a project on 256th from Kent Kangley to 116th was deleted and replaced by a project on 256th from 116th to 132nd, where grants have already been approved. Wickstrom noted that an agreement has been executed regarding 240th Street from 116th to 132nd, that a project has been identified on 132nd between 256th and 272nd due to volumes, that they have added the west corridor of the 228th Street project, and that there is a signal project at Canyon Drive and 94th for which safety grants may be available. The Mayor opened the public hearing. There were no comments from the audience and HOUSER MOVED to close the public hearing. Woods seconded and the motion carried. CLARK MOVED to adopt Resolution No. 1480 estab- lishing the 1997-2002 Six Year Transportation Improvement Plan. Woods seconded. Johnson voiced concern about putting five-lanes roads in residential areas, such as Priority No. 19 relating to 132nd Avenue SE between SE 266th and Kent Kangley Road. Wickstrom noted that this project is scheduled for approximately 2002 , and that 15-20, 000 vehicles a day use the southerly section of that two-lane road now. Johnson said widening roads in residential areas to five lanes needs to be addressed in the future. Wickstrom pointed out that the project on 132nd is not in the Capital Facilities Plan. Clark' s motion then carried. 3 September 3 , 1996 TRAFFIC (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3J) CONTROL S 196th Street Between West Valley Highway and East Valley Highway. ADOPTION of Ordinance No. 3311 condemning those properties along the 196th Corridor project as described in the ordinance and pursuant to its terms, as recom- mended by the Public Works Committee. PUBLIC WORKS (BIDS - ITEM 5B) S. 200th Street Green River Bridge West Approach Preload. Bid opening for this project was held on August 28th with 4 bids received. The low bid was submitted by M.A. Segale, Tukwila, in the amount of $453 , 550 . 00 . The Engineer' s estimate was $526 , 300 . 00 . This project consists of installing preload soil for the future Green River Bridge approach for the 196th/200th Street Corridor project. It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director that the contract be awarded to the lowest responsible bidder, subject to the City' s receipt of all required permits and right-of-ways within a time frame determined appropriate by the Public Works Director. Wickstrom noted receipt today of a contract docu- ment from the County supplementing the original engineering and right-of-way acquisition contract. CLARK MOVED that the Mayor be authorized to award the S. 200th Street Green River Bridge West Approach Preload contract to the lowest responsi- ble bidder, subject to the City' s receipt of all required permits and right-of-ways within a time frame determined appropriate by the Public Works Director, and further to authorize the Mayor to sign Supplement No. 1 to the 196th Street Corridor Interlocal Agreement with King County. Woods seconded and the motion carried. REZONE (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3L) Van Doren's Landing Building I Rezone RZ-96-4 . AUTHORIZATION to set September 17 , 1996 , as the date to consider the Van Doren' s Landing Building I Rezone RZ-96-4 . 4 September 3 , 1996 ANNEXATION (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3M) Green River Annexation AN-96-2 . AUTHORIZATION to set September 17 , 1996, as the date to meet with initiators of the 10 percent petition for the proposed Green River Annexation. The proposed annexation is generally located south and west of the Green River with the western boundary following the Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) Railroad south from the existing City boundary across the Green River to S. 277th Street and then along the north side of S. 277th easterly across S. Central Avenue and across the Green River to the existing City boundary. The boundary then goes northerly, following the existing City boundary and then westerly, following the Green River back to the point of beginning at the BNSF Railroad. The annexation is approximately 595 acres in size. COMMUNITY (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3D) DEVELOPMENT 1997 Community Development Block Grant Program BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) . AUTHORIZATION to set September 17 , 1996, as the date for a public hearing to consider the 1997 Community Development Block Grant Program. (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3E) 1997 99 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Interlocal Cooperative Agreement. APPROVAL of the 1997-1999 CDBG Interlocal Cooperation Agreement and authorization for the Mayor to sign the agreement, as recommended by the Planning Committee. (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3F) 1997 99 HOME Interlocal Cooperative Agreement_ . APPROVAL of the 1997-1999 HOME Interlocal Cooperation Agreement and authorization for the Mayor to sign the agreement, as recommended by the Planning Committee. APPOINTMENTS (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3K) Library Board Appointment. CONFIRMATION of the Mayor' s appointment of Brian Smith to serve as a member of the Kent Library Board. His appoint- ment will continue until 1/1/98 . Mr. Smith will replace Luella White, who resigned. 5 September 3 , 1996 APPOINTMENTS Mr. Smith is a Kent resident and is employed locally. He frequently uses the Kent Library facility and also encourages his four-year-old daughter, who has her own library card, to use and enjoy all that the Kent Library has to offer. FINANCE (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3B) Approval of Bills . APPROVAL of payment of the bills received through August 15 and paid on August 15 , 1996 , after auditing by the Operations Committee on August 21, 1996. Approval of checks issued for vouchers: Date Check Numbers Amount 8/15/96 172463-173037 $4 , 120, 548 . 03 Approval of checks issued for payroll for August 1 through August 15 and paid on August 20, 1996 : Date Check Numbers Amount 8/20/96 Checks 213769-214120 $ 287 , 829 .73 8/20/96 Advices 37234-37756 $ 617 . 641. 85 $ 905 , 471. 58 (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3C) 1996 Bond Issue Budget Chancre. APPROVAL of a budget change of $27 , 401, 866 for 1996 General Obligation Bonds, as recommended by the Operations Committee at their August 21, 1996 meeting. The June 27 , 1996 bonds were issued to purchase the Centennial Building, to purchase park land and facilities, to improve 240th Street, and to complete a combination wildlife/ wetland storm detention/treatment system. The budget covers the capital and debt service for 1996 . The operating portion of the Centennial Building budget has been previously approved. (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3I) Capital Facilities Plan. AUTHORIZATION to set September 17 , 1996, as the public hearing date for the 1997-2002 Capital Facilities Plan. REPORTS Council President. Houser announced that the Suburban Cities Association meeting will be held on September llth and asked those interested in attending to contact Ms. Banister. She also 6 September 3 , 1996 REPORTS noted that a celebration will be held at 3 : 00 p.m. on September 5th in honor of Finance Director May Miller' s 25th anniversary with the City. Operations Committee. Johnson noted that the Committee will meet tomorrow at 4 : 30 p.m. Public Works Committee. Clark noted that the meeting scheduled for September 4th has been cancelled, and that the next meeting will be in two weeks. Planning Committee. Orr announced that the next meeting of the Committee will be at 4 : 00 p.m. on September 17th. She then congratulated Ms. Miller on her 25 years of service to the city. Administrative Reports. McFall reminded Council of an executive session of approximately 15 minutes. EXECUTIVE The meeting recessed to executive session at SESSION 7 : 25 p.m. and reconvened at 7 : 39 p.m. JOHNSON MOVED to approve and authorize the Mayor to sign the Lease Termination Agreement with Puget Power and Kent Centennial Limited Partnership and the Sublease Assignment Agreement with Puget Power under terms and conditions substantially similar to those in the proposed agreements. Woods seconded and the motion carried. ADJOURNMENT There was no further business and the meeting adjourned at 7 : 40 p.m. Le �Jc'obAe Brendar, ; CMC City Clerk 7 111,14, Kent City Council Meeting Date September 17 , 1996 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: DISCOVERY GRANT - ACCEPT 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Accept and amend the budget for $5, 000. 00 received from the State of Washington Division of Developmental Disabilities to be used for specialized recreation programs, as recommended by the Parks Committee on September 3 , 1996 . The State of Washington Division of Developmental Disabilities has contributed an additional $5, 000 . 00 to the original $15, 000. 00 Discovery Grant accepted and appropriated in March 1996. The funding is to be used for a Specialized Recreation Youth/Teen Community Inclusion Coordinator and a Saturday Play Program for children with special needs. 3 . EXHIBITS: None 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Staff and Parks Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES X 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $5 , 000. 00 SOURCE OF FUNDS: State of Washington Division of Developmental Disabilities 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION• ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 3C �m Kent City Council Meeting Date September 17 , 1996 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: PEA PATCH GRANT - ACCEPT 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Accept and establish a budget for $19, 595 . 00 received from Urban Resources Partnership for the community pea patch program, as recommended by the Parks Committee on September 3, 1996. The first youth-facilitated pea patch gardens funded through the Puget Sound Urban Resources Partnership Grant in the amount of $19, 595. 00 were developed in 1995 for 1996 . Funding provided materials and compensation for ten teens to work in the program. 3 . EXHIBITS: Letter and grant recipient notice from King County Community Services Division 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Staff and Parks Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES X 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $19 ,595. 00 SOURCE OF FUNDS: King County Community Services 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 3D King Counh Community Services Division Aging Program Department of Community and Human Ser%ices Smith To«rr 506 Second Avenue,Room 2020 Seattle,RSA 98104 (206)296-5216 (206)296-0156 FAX (206)296-5242=/rDD October 25, 1995 City of Kent Parks and Recreation Department 315 East Meeker Kent. WA 98031 Dear Ms. Fraser: Thank you for your submittal of a proposal for grant funding from the King County Urban Resources Partnership. We were pleased to receive fifteen grant applications from a variety of organizations and for a variety of purposes in the King County region. Projects were selected for funding on the basis of the ten criteria listed in the original request for proposals, comparison to the other proposals submitted, and evaluation of overall consistency of the proposal with the mission of the federal program for Urban Resources Partnerships. We are happy to inform you that your proposal was accepted for funding on the basis of these criteria. We look forward to seeing you at the awards ceremony which will be held as follows: Time: Award Ceremony to be held 10:00 am - 11:30 am Date: Thursday,November 2, 1995 Location: International Marine Association Protecting Aquatic Life (I'M A PAL)Project Site Hamm Creek at 17th Place South &DesMoines Way South, South Park (South Seattle) In case of rain, the awards ceremony will be moved to Delta Marine Industries, Inc. conference room, located across from the project site at 1608 South 96th, Seattle. After the ceremony a tour of Delta Marine's factory and facility, known for its environmentally sound yacht-building practices, will be available. City of Kent Parks and Recreation Department October 25, 1995 Page 2 As one purpose of this partnership is to increase community participation, awareness, and knowledge of environmental issues and opportunities for environmental involvement, it is very important that either you or a representative from your group attend this awards ceremony. We anticipate that the ceremony will be covered by local media. The King County Executive and Councilmembers, the Under Secretary of Agriculture for Natural Resources and Environment, representatives from the United States Environmental Protection Agency, as well as other federal, state and local agencies will also be invited to attend. It is a good opportunity to establish relationships that may prove beneficial to your project in the long run. We encourage you to bring brochures, banners and any other promotional materials about your organization. If you will be attending the awards ceremony, please contact Suzanne Jackson, King County Community Services Division, at 296-7683. We look forward to working with you to develop a contract for these funds. Please do not incur any costs against these funds until we have given you authorization to do so. Someone from our office will be contacting you soon to set an appointment to begin contract negotiations. Again, we congratulate you on award of this grant funding, and we look forward to working with you throughout the coming year. Very Truly Yours, Sadikifu Akina-James for the King County Urban Resources Partnership Enclosures SAJ:SJ:jh:c:wrd6:winwrd:aging:rfpltr 1 cc: Maria Ramirez, Housing and Community Development Caroll Boone, Director, Urban Resources Partnership, University of Washington PUGET SOUND URBAN RESOURCES PARTNERSHIP and KING COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES DIVISION Grant Award Ceremony, November 3, 1995 Grant Award Recipients I'\1 A PAL (International Marine Association Protecting Aquatic Life) This S15,101 grant supports includes restoration of a wetland area which is the site of a former sewage treatment plant in South Park, as well as the installation of viewing platforms and interpretive signs. More than 150 community volunteers will participate in tree planting and other restoration activities. Kumg County Surface Water Nfanao meat is a major contributor of funding and technical assistance. City of Kent Parks and Recreation Bepartment A Sig 95 grant will hire 8-10 at-risk youth and provide wg food and yard waste, production of food including soil training about environmental problems, compost preparation,water conservation, and alteratives to pesticide use. The trained youth will work with it residents in gardening and community volunteers to build 5 community gardeus and train apartme composting techniques. Technical assistance will be prodded by the city's Recycling and Composting program, Cooperative Extension's Master Gardener Program, Natural Resources Conservation Services, the University of Washington Center for Urban Horticulture, and Seattle Tmlth. King County Surface Water Management Division This 56,433 grant will offer job training skills for 8 community at-risk youth that will teach them to provide water quality and pollution prevention iinformation, and assistance to targeted non--English speaker businesses located in White Center near Salmon Creek Basin. The targeted business are typically small, some family-owned, including automotive service shops, light manufacturing, and several grocery stores. Other organizations involved include King County's Business Recycling Program, White Center Chamber of Commerce, and the Environmental Coalition of South Seattle. Environmental Quality Commission , City of Lake Forest Park A S3,550 grant will be used to replace an existing culvert that is impassable for returning salmon as part of a creek restoration project located at Brookside School. The site will be used for environmental education activities iinvol•ing diverse populations including at-risk students King County Surface Management, Bookside School, Shorecrest High School, Shoreline Public Schools, and the I`lid-sound Fishery Enhancement Council are cooperators in this project. City of Renton Solid Waste Utility This S3Y02 grant will support 3 inters from target populations who will canvass door-to-door to provide recycling education information to targeted ,ton-English speaking and low-income multifamily residents. Materials addressing garbage disposal, conservation, and recycling will include signs, stickers, and brochures in Vietnamese, Spanish, Russian, and English.Tenant associations and the Renton Housing Authority will work with this project. Highline Community College A 522,522 grant will support the development of environmental learning center including four different areas, each representing a different Washington native plant environment (coastal,western Washington forest, subalpine, and Eastern Washington). The center will be used by Higbline Community College students, high school classes, and open to community residents at no charge. The project will also involve area businesses. Puget Sound Urban Resources Partnership Grant Award Recipients, Page 2 City of Lake Forest Park This 52�16 grant supports a gardening education project that will involve 3rd, 4th, and 5th grade students at Brookside Elementary School. The project will target at-risk youth from a nearby public housing project. Activities will include, green gardening nn three raised planter beds, ent. Kinga County Master Recycler Composter Program composting, irrigation, and pest managem volunteers will participate. Seattle Audubon Society An 518,670 grant will mobilize community wetland habitat teams in three low- income neighborhoods (White Center Poind, low- ' Meadow's, and Cavanaugh Ponds). Project activities will demonstrate educational and economic benefits to targeted adult ogra at-risk youth da ticentryspublic by incorporating job skills including bird and habitat identification, p P speakiag, and community organization. Scientific data gathered will be shared with King �atne Plant Water Management Division. Existing Audubon partners include Cooperative Extension, Society, Puget Sound Water Quality Authority, People for Puget Sound, King County Department of Development and Environmental Justice. This project targets the following new partners: Park Lake Homes Association, \Vhite Center Youth Task Force, Whit Center Chamber of Commerce, and local small businesses. Nautilus Elementary School Landscape Committee A 514,005 grant will help develop a natural forest area that will provide opportunities for environmental education for students, students from neighboring schools, and the community-at-large. Site activities include clearing undergrowtin, removing diseased trees, building trails, and installing plant identification signs. Local Boy Scouts, Natural Resources Conservation Service, and the Marine Hills Garden Club will be involved in restoration and maintenance. City of Federal Way, Parks, Recreation, and Cultural Services Department A 57,210 grant will be used to develop and install interpretive signs in several languages of community residents, including Korean; and the construction of a wheelchair accessible gate in Dumas Bay Open Space. Cooperating organizations include the Boys and Girls Club of Federal Way and the Audubon Society. Science Links This 519,927 will involve about 2:,0 intermediate students from Redmond Elementary School and community seniors from a senior center, retirement home, and local tribe Forking together to revegetate an historical salmon spawtning and rearing stream and create a community environmental 'A ill e involved in es that include education site. At-risk students will be tea cgeeuaific mea as norementsteers o organizing data, pplying'mathematics, job skills such as reading, writing, making ` Propagating and planting plants, and c rpentrv. Participating entities include Redmond High School Biology class and Environmental Club, City of Redmond Parks and, King Public Works Departments, and King County Surface Water Management. Urban Environmental Awareness A 53,000 grant will support activities that increase environmental awareness of at-risk youth, provide opportunities for exploring environmental careers, and involve them in "hands on" activities including planting trees and plants in community open space areas located in the Renton Highland and Skyway area in learning about the relationship between the environmental problems (pollution, degradation of fish habitat), urban growth, and community neglect. Projects will be developed with the Renton School District. For more information, contact the Puget Sound Urban Resources Partnership office at 543-7303/Fax 616-2685. �kl Kent City Council Meeting Date September 17 , 1996 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: WORK TRAINING GRANT - ACCEPT 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Accept and establish a budget for $12 ,978 . 00 received from King County for the Summer Trails Program, as recommended by the Parks Committee on September 3 , 1996. With $12 , 978 . 00 funded from King County, Community Services Division, the Summer Trails Teen Work Program was created for youth to build trails in the park system throughout the summer. 3 . EXHIBITS: Letter from King County Community Services Division 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Staff and Parks Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES X 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $12 , 978. 00 SOURCE OF FUNDS: King County Community Services 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION• ACTION• Council Agenda Item No. 3E King ne Count' Co umm. Services Division work Training Program Department of Community and Human Ser%ices Smith Tower Building 506 Second Avenue Room 305 Seattle,wA 98104 (206)296-5220 (206)296.52.42 TDDrM (206)296.0298 FAX May 28, 1996 Ms. Cheryl Fraser, Manager City of Kent Parks & Recreation 31 5 Meeker Street Kent, WA. 98031 RE: King Countv Work Training Program's Intent to Contract Dear Ms. Fraser: Thank you very much for working with the King County Work Training Program (WTP) to operate a summer program this year. This letter will serve notice of WTP's intent to contract with the City of Kent Parks & Recreation for the project titled Youth Conservation Corp. The contract amount will not exceed S12,978. Copies of the contract should arrive some time during the first part of June for your signature. Meanwhile, it is important that your staff coordinate efforts with WTP staff to ensure that youth identified for participation in the program have completed applications and are eligible for the summer program. Please contact either myself or Bormie Hester at 296-5220 if you have any questions regarding project start-up activities. We are looking forward to working with you in the coordination of an exciting and successful summer project. Sincerely. Debra duGuerre Administrative Assistant Dd:b:intentcon.96sc cc: Bonnie Hester, Educational Coordinator, Work Training Program Pat Martinez, Contract Coordinator, Work Training Program �41111 Kent City Council Meeting Date September 17 1996 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: MOBILE RECREATION/COMPUTER GRANT - APPROPRIATE 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Amend the 1996 budget to allow for the expenditure of $38, 000. 00 received from King County for the Mobile Recreation/Computer Program, as recommended by the Parks Committee on September 3 , 1996. In 1995, the Parks Committee accepted a $38 , 000. 00 King County grant awarding the Youth/Teen Program funds to purchase a vehicle that provides a mobile recreation and computer program for local youth. The actual expenditure took place in 1996, therefore the appropriation to expend the funds needs to be carried over to 1996. 3 . EXHIBITS: Letter from King County 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Staff and Parks Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES X 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $38 , 000 . 00 SOURCE OF FUNDS: King County 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION• Council Agenda Item No. 3F King County September 29, 1995 Cheryl M. Fraser City of Kent, Parks and Recreation Department 325 E. Meeker Kent, WA. 98031 Dear Ms. Fraser, Congratulations, the proposal you submitted for the Mobile Recreation/ Computer Program has been recommended for a one-time award of 538,000. The award would be available to your community partnership after the contract is negotiated and signed. This award is a one-time (non-renewable ) award for a period of time not to exceed 15 months or December 1996. The County may not reimburse you for any costs incurred prior to contract signature. The number of proposals submitted for On-going funds and for the One-Time funds provided ample evidence of the needs and the efforts of many communities throughout the County that are working on youth agendas. The proposal review committee spent a great deal of time reviewing the proposals. The committee review process resulted in recommendations which were presented to the King County Executive staff and Council staff. Unfortunately, not all of the projects could be funded at the requested levels. Although your proposal could not be funded at the requested amount the committee encourages you to create an opportunity for youth to have hands on experience with computers and with a video production. The review committee also recommended that the funded projects will develop outcome measures as part of the contract negotiations. You will be contacted very soon by a member of the staff to the King County Children and Family Commission to arrange for contract negotiation. You should submit a revised project budget as soon as possible and prior to your scheduled contract negotiation. You may fax this to Marissa Alegria at 296-3462, or mail it to her at the Office of Financial Management, Room 420, King County Courthouse, 516 Third Avenue, Seattle, 98104. If you have any questions, at this time, please contact Marissa Alegria at 296-3430. 3 The copies of the submitted proposals and the rating summaries are available for your review on October 10-13 from 9 a.m.-5 p.m in the office of the King County Children and Family Commission, Room 420, King County Courthouse, 516 Third Avenue, Seattle. Please call 296-3430 for an appointment. You will receive an invitation to attend the press conference announcing the Safe Community/Youth Partnership Awards to the general public. This is tentatively scheduled for late in October. Please plan to attend and bring a project participant(s) as you may be asked to talk about your project. Congratulations again on your successful proposal! Sincerely, Lee Valenta, Chair King County Children and Family Commission Kent City Council Meeting Date September 17 , 1996 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: KING COUNTY CONSERVATION FUTURES INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT - AMENDMENT 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Authorization for the Mayor to sign an amendment to the 1990 Conservation Futures Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between King County and the City of Kent to include the allocation of the 1994/95 Conservation Futures Fund and to accept and establish a budget for the $200, 000. 00 grant, as recommended by the Parks Committee on September 31 1996 . Through the 1994/95 Conservation Futures Grant competition, the City of Kent has been recommended to receive $200 , 000 . 00 towards the acquisition of 14 . 5 acres on the East Hill of Kent. 3 . EXHIBITS: Amendment 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Staff and Parks Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $200 , 000. 00 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Conservation Futures Grant 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION• Council Agenda Item No. 3G AMENDMENT TO THE CONSERVATION FUTURES INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN KING COUNTY AND THE CITY OF KENT FOR OPEN SPACE BOND ACQUISITION PROJECTS Preamble The King County Council, through Ordinance 9128, has established a Conservation Futures Fund and appropriated proceeds to King County, the City of Seattle, and certain suburban cities. Ordinance 9430 provided for the use of Conservation Futures Funds collected in the years 1990 through 1993 for the completion of projects as set forth in Ordinance 9071. This amendment is entered into to provide for the allocation of additional funds made available for project completion. The parties have agreed to amend the existing Interlocal Cooperative Agreement to provide for additions in the references to the fund allocation. THIS AMENDMENT is entered into between the CITY OF KENT ("City") and KING COUNTY, and amends and attaches to and is part thereof of the existing Interlocal Cooperation Agreement entered into between the parties, dated the 5' day of June, 1990. The parties agree to the following amendments: Amendment 1: Article 1. Recitals The fifth paragraph of the Recitals Section is hereby appended to provide for the 1994/95 allocation, and hereafter reads: "On , 19K the Kina County Council passed Ordinance _ which appropriated a total of S2,375,347 in Conservation Futures Levy proceeds to the City of Seattle and Suburban cities. The Council has approved the allocation of 1994/95 Conservation Futures Funds to the jurisdictions and authorized the Kina County Executive to enter into interlocal cooperation agreements with the City of Seattle and the Suburban Cities in order to initiate the approved projects." Amendment 2: Article VII Responsibility of Countv The first two sentences of this article are amended to include Attachment C, which lists the 1994/95 Suburban Conservation Futures Allocation, and hereafter reads: Interlocal Amendment I August N, 1996 "Subject to the terms of this agreement, the County will provide Conservation Futures Levy Funds in the amount shown in Attachment A, B and C. The City may request additional funds; however, the County has no obligation to provide funds to the City in excess of the amount shown in Attachments A, B and C." In all other respects, the terms, conditions, duties and obligations of both parties shall remain the same as agreed to in the Interlocal Cooperative Agreement. This document shall be attached to be a part of the existing Interlocal Cooperative Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, authorized representatives of the parties hereto have signed their names in the spaces set forth below: KING COUNTY CITY OF KENT Gary Locke Jim White King County Executive Mayor Date Date Acting under the authority of Acting under the authority of Ordinance Resolution No. Dated: Approved as to form: Approved as to form: NORM MALENG City Attorney King County Prosecuting Attorney ATTEST: City Clerk Auflust 20, 1996 Interlocal Amendment 2 ATTACHMENT C 1994/95 CONSERVATION FUTURES CITY OF SEATTLE AND SUBURBAN CITIES ALLOCATIONS Jurisdiction Project Allocation Seattle Greenspace Additions S 479,000 Ballard/Greenwood Neighborhood Open Space S 4367347 Thornton Creek Watershed (Victory Creek) S 110.000 Seattle Subtotal S1,025,347 Bellevue Lewis Park Addition S 400,000 Des Moines McSorely Creek S 100,000 Issaquah Issaquah Creek Greenway S 150,000 Kent Kent Southeast Boundary OS S 200,000 North Bend/Snoqualmie Meadowbrook Farm S 500.000 Suburban Subtotal S1,350,000 TOTAL S2,375,347 Conditions City of Seattle - Greenspace Additions: This project is for greenspace additions in the Duwamish Head Greenbelt, and in the Maple School Natural Area. These properties were identified as priorities in the City's 1993 Urban Greenspaces Policy. The Duwamish Head Greenbelt property is highly visible from downtown Seattle; has an excellent view of the City, Elliot Bay and the Cascades, which are threatened by development. The Maple School ravine property is adjacent to Graham Street, an east/west arterial between the Duwamish valley and the Beacon Hill Neighborhood. City of Seattle - Ballard/Greenwood Neighborhood Open Space: The goal of this project is to acquire needed open space in a densely populated Seattle community that is currently under- served. The local community has conducted an impressive grass roots open space identification planning process that has yielded over 100 possible sites for local open space acquisitions. The community has agreed to identify a final list of properties for acquisitions, that are located along the Interurban North Trail and will complement this regional facility. August 20, 1996 Interlocal Amendment Citv_ of Seattle -Thornton Creek Watershed (Victory Creek): This project includes a wooded .16 acre parcel that contains the confluence of Thornton and Victory Creeks, in Northeast Seattle. This property complements additional nearby city acquisitions and street vacations and meets the criteria for the Urban Waterways 2000 program. Suburban Cities City of Bellevue - Lewis Park Addition: This 14-acre scenic property is located on Lakemont Boulevard and is the last remaining large parcel contiguous to Bellevue's 35-acre Lewis Park. The park is located south of I-90, where 1/3 of the City's residents live today, in a neighborhood with intense development pressure. Bellevue is providing a significant match of S 1.5 million from its adopted CIP program, and has applied for S500,000 in state IAC funds. City of Des Moines - McSorely Creek: This project is a 9 acre wooded open space, located on 16`' Avenue in Des Moines. The property contains McSorely Creek and is connected by a trail to a local elementary school. The property is offered for sale to the City at a significant discount; less than one quarter of its appraised value, because the owner wishes to see it preserved in perpetuity. Acquisition of this parcel will also help the city meet its shortfall of 50 acres of open space identified in its adopted comprehensive plan. City of Issaquah -Issaquah Creek Greenway Phase I: This 8 acre project consists of seven previously-approved platted lots located in a floodplain along Issaquah Creek off the Issaquah- Hobart Road. The site is surrounded by open space dedicated through an adjacent development and will be a link in the City's local trail network, which passes through the nearby Issaquah is site will also help the City better protect this salmon-beanng High School. Acquisition of th creek and contribute to its Greenway project. The City will also remove a paved road into the properties as part of the proposed site restoration. Geographic balance in funding supports only partial funding of this application. City of Kent -Kent Southeast Boundary Open Space: This project is a wooded 14.5 acre site containing an intermittent stream, located on the ciry's southeast boundary along State Route 18. The property is part of a proposed combined open space and ballfield park in an area that is one of the most rapidly urbanizing communities in King County, a community with a deficit of open spaces. There are few remaining open space opportunities in this community and the City is working to identify local funds for acquisition of the ballfield portion of the adjacent site. City of North Bend/Snoqualmie - Meadowbrook Farm: Located between the Cities of North Bend and Snoqualmie, Meadowbrook Farm is an exceptional open space with multiple benefits important to our region. This property is a key _51 acre inholdinG located in the most scenic portion of the farm, at the base of Mount Si. August 20, 1996 In[erlocal Amendment �1-0 Kent City Council Meeting Date September 17 , 1996 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: SURPLUS VEHICLES - AUTHORIZATION 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works Committee, authorization to declare certain Equipment Rental vehicles and equipment no longer needed by the City as surplus, and authorize the sale thereof. 3 . EXHIBITS: Public Works Director memorandum 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (3-0 telephone concurrence (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6. EXPENDITURE REOUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 3H DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS August 30, 1996 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Don Wickstrom RE: Surplus Vehicles Authorization Request Attached is a list of Equipment Rental vehicles which are no longer needed by the City. As such,we are requesting that they be declared as surplus and sold at the next State auction. ACTION: Declare these vehicles as surplus and authorize the sale thereof at the next State of Washington auction. (Committee adopted action via individual phone contact) T/DW96371 Public Works Operations MEMORANDUM Fax: 859-3664 Phone: 859-3395 Date : August 15 , 1996 To : Don Wickstrom, Pu l ' c Works Director From: Steve Hennesse leet Managegr �� Thru : Eddy Chu, Operations Manager/�1V Subject : Surplus Vehicles Authorization Request I am requesting authorization to surplus vehicles that are no longer needed by Equipment Rental . These vehicles will be sold at the next State of Washington Auction on October 19 , 1996 #5350 1982 Ford Granada Wagon with 64 , 392 miles 96-17 Vehicle has a rear main seal leaking and body needs repainting. #8706 1985 Ford LTD Wagon with 78 , 450 miles Vehicle needs excessive repair to the differential and the transmission. #8707 1982 Ford Granada Wagon with 63 , 575 miles Vehicle has a rear engine main seal leak and the transmission is slipping . #8708 1985 Chevrolet 1/2 Ton Pickup with 80 , 829 miles Vehicle has low compression requiring an engine overhaul . #8710 1981 Dodge 1/2 Ton Pickup with 84 , 998 miles Vehicle needs repainting and the engine needs an overhaul . #8719 1986 Chevrolet Cargo Van with 106 , 780 miles Vehicle needs an engine overhaul and will not pass emissions . #8720 1981 Dodge Cargo Van with 79032 miles Vehicle needs transmission repair and body needs repainting. CC : Frank Olson Bill Price Dianne Sullivan SH/97surplus . wpt �W/41 Kent City Council Meeting Date September 17 , 1996 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: KENT SPRINGS TRANSMISSION MAIN REPAIR - ACCEPT AS COMPLETE 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works Director, accept as complete the contract with Frank Coluccio Construction for the Kent Springs Transmission Main Repair project and release retainage after State releases. The original contract amount was $895 , 871. 10. The final construction cost was $911,757 . 04 . 3 . EXHIBITS: vicinity map 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Director (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 3I 1 o y Z 178TH A VE. SE z � c, 181S T m Z 189TH 192ND Ort�j ro Q) m 197TH Z / n 199 TH 1 20/ST / 201ST U 203RD k ' 203RD \ 204 TH N � y i Cb = 207TH 208TH Q) r Q) No 216TH A VE. S.E. � :10Z Q � r) I m = 2 m in, r J y KENT SPRINGS TRANSMISSION MAIN REPAIf Kent City Council Meeting Date September 17 1996 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: COUNCIL4EMBER ABSENCE 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Councilmember Johnson has requested an excused absence from the September 17 , 1996, City Council meeting. He is unable to attend. 3 . EXHIBITS: Memorandum 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Jon Johnson (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION• ACTION• Council Agenda Item No. 3J MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR JIM WHITE CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: JON JOHNSON, COUNCILMEMBER DATE: SEPTEMBER 12, 1996 SUBJECT: CITY COUNCIL EXCUSED ABSENCE I would like to request an excused absence from the September 17, 1996 City Council meeting. I will be unable to attend. Thank you for your consideration. JJJb �/iT Kent City Council Meeting Date September 17 , 1996 Category Other Business 1. SUBJECT: STREAM BUFFER REQUIREMENTS ZCA-96-4 - ORDINANCE 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: The City is acting under an interim ordinance that has maintained King County standards for stream setback requirements within the Meridian Annexation area. The interim ordinance will expire on October 1, 1996. The Planning Committee has recommended approval of this ordinance pertaining to the Soos Creek Basin Stream Buffers within the Meridian Annexation area. This ordinance imposes buffers similar to, but not more restrictive than, the County' s stream buffer requirements. 3 . EXHIBITS: Ordinance and Planning Committee minutes of 9/3/96 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Planning Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: ' I Councilmember _moves, Councilmember seconds adoption of Ordinance No. 3 30, pertaining to Soos Creek Basin Stream Buffers within the Meridian Annexation. DISCUSSION: ACTION• Council Agenda Item No. 4A City Council Planning Committee Minutes September '), 1996 Page 2 Clark asked for further clarification relating to the YWCA of Seattle-King County Domestic Violence Housing. Human Services Manager Lin Houston explained that the funds proposed would cover the rent of five units for one year and some support services. Committee member Tim Clark MOVED and Committee member Jon Johnson SECONDED the motion to accept staff recommendations. The motion carried. 9ZCA-96-4 STREAM BUFFER REQUIREMENTS - (M. Jackson) Planner Matt Jackson presented the Committee with maps showing the entire Soos Creek Basin Planning Area and the City of Kent Soos Creek Basin Overlay. He explained that the Ordinance would govern potential annexation areas covered by the drainage basin once the areas were annexed into the City. Assistant City Attorney Tom Brubaker discussed some language changes recommended by the Public Works Department. The changes are as follows: 1. Page 1 - language amended to indicate the three major creeks and their unnamed tributaries. 2. Page 11 (Definitions) - Add language to the "small livestock" definition to further clarify the livestock densities, six (6) small livestock will be equivalent to one large livestock. 3. Page 19 - In regard to manure storage areas add the language "6) Manure shall not be piled within any stream buffer." Brubaker explained that these changes do not go beyond what exists in the current King County Stream Buffer Ordinance. Committee member Tim Clark clarified that this Ordinance would continue the protection that King County had in place. Brubaker confirmed that Kent's Ordinance would incorporate the same or slightly less restrictive buffer requirements that were in place in King County. Committee member Jon Johnson MOVED to send the Stream Buffer Ordinance with amended changes discussed today to the full City Council on the September 17th for adoption. The motion was SECONDED by Committee member Tim Clark. The motion carried. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 4:25 p.m. U:\DOC\PCOM\MINUTES\PC00903.N11N ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, amending Kent City Code Section 15.08.224 pertaining to Soos Creek Basin Stream Buffers within the Meridian Annexation Area. WHEREAS, on January 1, 1996, the City annexed a 5.27 square mile area of unincorporated King County lying east of the existing City limits, commonly known as the Meridian Annexation Area; and WHEREAS, three major creeks within the Soos Creek drainage system, Soos Creek, Big Soos Creek, and Little Soos Creek, together with many unnamed tributaries to those creeks, lie within the City's Meridian Annexation area; and WHEREAS, these three creeks and their tributaries constitute a significant part of a unique regional drainage system, providing valuable habitat for salmon and other plant and wildlife species; and WHEREAS, Metropolitan King County's development setbacks along these tributaries, known as "buffers," establish more effective protection for these tributaries' systems than would be established under Kent City Code development standards; and WHEREAS, various parties who deem themselves affected by this potential change in setback requirements have notified the City of their concerns for the continued preservation of this important habitat area; and Stream Buffer WHEREAS, on December 19, 1995, after a public hearing on the matter, the Kent City Council, by its Ordinance No. 3259, established interim zoning controls relating to preservation of these stream buffers so that City staff could conduct further study on the matter; and WHEREAS, the City staff has studied this matter, and on May 29, 1996, the City's Interim Land Use and Planning Board held a public hearing on a proposed zoning map and text amendment that will permanently preserve these established stream development standards on these tributaries in the Meridian Annexation Area; and WHEREAS, the Interim Land Use and Planning Board determined, in principle, to implement these setbacks and buffers, subject to review under the State Environmental Policy Act ("SEPA") and also subject to final review and approval of the implementing ordinance; and WHEREAS, on June 18, 1996, the Kent City Council, by its Ordinance No. 3300, extended the established interim zoning controls created by Ordinance No. 3259 to preserve these stream development standards in the Meridian Annexation Area in order to conduct SEPA review and to develop regulations pursuant to the direction of the Interim Land Use and Planning Board; and WHEREAS, SEPA review is now complete and the appropriate regulations have been reviewed and accepted; NOW, THEREFORE, 2 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Soos Creek Drainage Basin Stream Buffers Adopted. The following stream buffer regulations within the Soos Creek Basin are adopted as an overlay zoning requirement within the City's Meridian Annexation Area and potential annexation area, a map indicating the affected basin within the annexation areas is attached as Exhibit A. Accordingly, Kent City Code Section 15.08.224 is amended as follows: Sec. 15.08.224. Same--Classifications and restrictions. A. Classification categories and restrictions on lot coverage. Classification categories and restrictions on lot coverage relative to hazard areas, from least to most restrictive, are as follows: Classification Maximum Amount of im- pervious Surfaces Allowed 1. Low hazard areas. In low hazard areas, the maximum amount of impervious surface allowed on each lot is thirty (30) percent. Low hazard areas are defined as lands where the following conditions exist: a. Slopes fifteen (15) percent to twenty-five (25) percent together with class 3 seismic hazard and class 2 erosion hazard area; or 30% b. Slopes fifteen (15) percent to twenty-five (25) percent together with class 2 slide and slippage and class 3 erosion hazard area; or 30% 3 l C. Slopes fifteen 05) percent to twenty-five (25) percent together with class 2 seismic and class 3 erosion hazard area; or 30% d. Seventy-five (75) to one hundred fifty (150) feet from the top of a ravine in which a major or minor stream passes through; or 30% e. Thirty (30) to fifty (50) feet from the ordinary high-water mark of a lake. (See the following illustration.) 30% 2. Moderate hazard areas. In moderate hazard areas, the maximum amount of impervious surface allowed on each lot is ten (10) percent. Moderate hazard areas are defined as those lands where the following conditions exist: zero to thirty (30) feet from the ordinary high-water mark of a lake. (See illustration.) 10% 3. High hazard areas. In high hazard areas, the maximum impervious surface allowed on each lot is two (2) percent. High hazard areas are defined as those lands where the following conditions exist: a. Slopes fifteen (15) percent to twenty-five (25) percent together with class 2 slide and slippage and class 3 seismic hazard, and class 3 erosion hazard area; or 2% b. Slopes fifteen (15) percent to twenty-five (25) percent together with class 3 slide and slippage and class 3 erosion hazard area; or 2% C. Slopes twenty-five (25) percent to forty (40) percent together with class 3 seismic and class 3 erosion hazard area; or 2% d. Slopes twenty-five (25) percent to forty (40) percent together with class 3 erosion hazard area. 2% 4. Severe hazard areas. In severe hazard areas, the maximum amount of impervious surface allowed on each lot is zero 4 i percent. Severe hazard areas are defined as those lands where the following conditions exist: a. Slopes forty (40) percent and over; or 0% b. Slopes twenty-five (25) percent to forty (40) percent together with class 3 slide and slippage, class 3 seismic hazard, and class 3 erosion hazard area; or 0% C. All ravines; or 0% d. Seventy-five (75) foot setback from the top of any ravine. The top of a ravine is where the slope is generally less than fifteen (15) percent; or 0% e. Fifty (50) foot setback from the ordinary high-water mark of any major creek; or 0% f. Twenty-five (25) foot setback from the ordinary high-water mark of any minor creek; or 0% g. Ten (10) foot setback from the top of any drainage ditch; or 0% h. All wetlands as defined in the document Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States, by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service of the Department of Interior, a copy of which is filed with the city clerk. This classification shall exclude all wetlands considered in the Valley Floor Studies; or 0% i. All unique and fragile areas defined in the revised Valley Floor Studies, approved by city council on February 23, 1981, a copy of which is filed with the city clerk. 0% B. Determination of precise location of hazard areas. 1. The hazard area development limitations map adopted by section 15.08.222 is based upon the most accurate data available at the time of preparation. 5 1! i 2. To more accurately determine the location of hazard areas, the city may require additional information with development proposals, including but not limited to a survey of the area. The hazard area map shall be corrected by planning and public works departments based upon more recent and accurate information accepted by such departments. C. Relocation of major or minor creek. 1. All major and minor creeks in the city, where they flow on or across undeveloped land, shall be retained in their natural state and location. 2. Where retaining the major or minor creek in its natural state may interfere with a proposed development, a site specific plan, referred to in this section as a stream plan, drawn to scale, shall be prepared, which indicates how the development will be constructed in relation to the stream and in relation to required storm drainage regulations. 3. A stream plan shall be submitted to the city planning department for its review prior to the issuance of any permit, including zoning, building, grading, storm drainage or hydraulics. 4. The planning department shall review the stream plan in relation to the proposed development plan and make a determination that the plan does protect the integrity of the major or minor creek. 5. The planning department may cause a modification of the development plan to ensure that the integrity of the major or minor creek is in fact retained. 6. Any authorization for changing the course of a major or minor creek or for working in a major or minor creek shall follow the guidelines and recommendations of the state department of fisheries and game (RCW 75.20.100). 7. Setbacks from a relocated major creek shall be fifty (50) feet or as recommended by the state department of fisheries and game, whichever is the greater. 6 8. Setbacks from a relocated minor creek shall be twenty-five (25) feet or as recommended by the state department of fisheries and game, whichever is the greater. D. Soos Creek Basin Stream Buffers overlay zone 1 Purpose. Streams constitute environmentally sensitive areas that are of special concern to the City of Kent. The following stream buffer regulations are intended to protect those environmentally sensitive features within the City of Kent By regulating development and alterations to these sensitive areas, the City seeks to: Protect unique fragile and valuable element,; of the environment including wildlife and its habitat: b,. Mitigate unavoidable impacts to environmentally sensitive areas by reszularing alterations in and adiacent to sensitive areas: Prevent cumulative adverse environmental impacts to water availability water quality, wetlands and streams: Protect the public trust as to navigable waters and aquatic resources: Alert members of the public including, but not limited to appraisers owners potential buyers or lessees to the development limitations of sensitive areas: f Provide City officials with sufficient information to protect sensitive areas* n g, Implement the policies of the State Environmental Policy Act. Chapter 43 21C RCW Kent City Code Chapter 11 05 Title 15 and the City of Kent Comprehensive Plan. 2. Definitions. In the interpretation of the Soos Creek Basin Stream Buffers overlay zone regulations Kent City Code Section 15.08.224(D), the following words, terms, or pronouns in place of them shall take precedent over other conflictin definitions existing elsewhere in this code and shall have the following meanings: Biologic A person who has earned a four year degree in biological sciences from an accredited college or university, or a person who has equivalent educational training and who has experience as a practicing biolmzist. Buffer - The zone contiguous to a sensitive area that is required for the continued maintenance. function and/or structural stability of the sensitive area. Buffer widths vary depending on the relative quality and sensitivity of the area being protected The critical functions of the riparian buffer (those associated with an aquatic system) include shading, input of organic debris and coarse Sediments uptake of nutrients stabilization of banks. interception of sediments overflow during high water events, protection from disturbance by humans and domestic animals maintenance of wild habitat and room for variation of as aU tic system boundaries over time due to hydrological or climatic effects The critical functions of terrestrial buffers include protection of slope stability, attenuation of surface water flows from stormwater runoff and precipitation and erosion control. Building Setback Area -A defined width of land between a sensitive area buffer and development which establishes a definite point beyond which clearing trimming or removal of vegetation fill overhangs, obstructions impervious surfaces and building foundations shall not extend Critical Drainage Area - An area which has been determined by the Department of Public Works to require more restrictive regulation than City- wide standards afford in order to mitigate water quality, severe flooding. drainage, erosion or sedimentation problems which have resulted or will result from the cumulative impacts of development and urbanization Director - The Director of the City of Kent Planning Department or his/her authorized designee. 8 Ditches - Irrigation ditches. canals, storm or surface water conveyance channels, or other entirely artificial watercourses not utilized by salmonids. Ditches do not include reaches of streams that have been relocated, or otherwise created to reroute flows around developments or public works facilities but which carry flows from established creeks. Enhancement - An action which increases the functions and values of a stream, wetland or other sensitive area. Large Livestock - Larger livestock such as meat and dairy cattle, other bovines llamas and horses. Livestock - Animals of any kind kept or raised for use or pleasure. Livestock Fencing- Fencing constructed in such a way that it is at least four feet in height. and that livestock cannot push it over. step over it, or walk around it. Livestock fencing includes electric fences with at least two parallel electrically charged wires, four strand barbed wire fences. and other standard stock fences in common use by the livestock industry'. Line of Mean High Water -The margin of the area occupied bathe water for the greater portion of each average year: at this level a definite escarpment in the soil will generally be traceable; where the edge of vegetation exists alone the bank in the same location from year to year, the line of mean high water is the same as the line of ordinary high water mark. Mitigation - The use of any or all of the following actions that are listed in descending order of preference: 1) avoiding the impact altogether Lv not taking a certain action or parts of an action: 2) minimizing the im are ct by I imitiniz the degree or magnitude of the action and its implementation, by using appropriate technology, or by taking affirmative actions to avoid or reduce impacts: 3) rectifying the impact by repairing, rehabilitating or restoring the affected sensitive area: 4) reducing or eliminating the impact over time by preservation or maintenance operations during the life of the project proposal: 5) compensating for the impact by replacing enhancing or providing substitute sensitive areas and environments: 6) monitoring the impact and taking appropriate corrective measures. 9 Monitoring Evaluating thp impacts of deveio mint proposals on the biologic _hydrologic and geologic elements of sensitive areas and systems and assessing the pQrformance of required mitigation measures through the collection and analysis of data by various methods for the purposes of understanding and documenting-changes in natural ecosystems and features. and includes gatherinp- baseline data. Native Growth Protection Area An area whose native growth is protected from unauthorized removal trimming and planting for the purpose of protecting the public health safety and welfare Native Vegetation Vegetation comprised of plant species which are in i2enous to the Puget Sound region and which could have been expected to naturally occur on the site._Native vegetation does not include noxious weeds. reed canary grass, cattails;_purple loosestrife and other highly invasive and undesirable Ip ants. Noxious Weed Any plant which when established is highly destructive._ competitive or difficult to control by natural or chemical,nractic_ see 0 The state noxious ,aped Pict n Chapter 16-750 WAC Chapter 1 7. I V R vv 1. The� � ��aic noxious •• is the officially adopttd list of noxious weeds by the state noxious weed control board. Ordinary High Water Mark The mark that will usually be found by examining the bed and banks of a stream or river, and ascertaining where the presence and action of waters are so common and usual, and so long maintained in all ordinary years, as to mark upon the soil a character distinct from that of the abutting upland, with respect to vegetation In any area where the ordinary high water mark cannot be found the line of mean high water shall substitute. In any area where neither can be found, the top of the channel bank shall be substituted In braided channels and alluvial fans; the ordinary high water mark or substitute shall be measured as to include the entire stream feature, Public Agency Any.agency, political subdivision. or unit of local government of this state including by not limited to municipal corporations. special rRosP districts and local service districts any agency of the State of Washin¢ton the United States or state thereof; or any Indian Tribe recognized as such by theFal government. 10 1 Salmonid-A member of the fish family Salmodiae In Kind County salmonid species include Chinook Coho chum sockeye and 12ink salmon: cutthroat rainbow, brown trout and steelh ad• Dolly Varden brook trout, char. kokanee and white fish Sensitive Areas - Any of those areas in the City of Kent which are subject to natural hazards or those land features which support unique fragile or valuable natural resources including fishes wildlife and other organisms and their habitat and such resources which, in their natural state carry, hold or purify water, Sensitive areas include. the following landform features: erosion hazard areas coal mine hazard areas land-slide hazard areas, seismic hazard areas s. _tee slope hazard areas wetlands flood hazard areas. and the adjoining protective buffers r n ssan� to protect the public health safety and welfare. Sensitive Area Tract -A separate tract that is created to protect a sensitive area and its buffer and whose ownership is transferred to the City of Kent, or other approved entity. Small Livestock - Smaller livestock such as piggy goats sheen miniature horses and feeder calves. For the purposes of maximum livestock densities in this ordinance, six (6) small livestock shall be equivalent to one large I ivestock. Streams - Those areas of-Kent where surface waters flows ffi i ntly to produce a defined channel or bed. A defined channel or bed is an area which demonstrates clear evidence of the pia age of water and includes but is not limited to bedrock-channels, gravel hens sand and silt hens and defined channel swales This definition is not intended to include irrigation ditches, canals. storm or-Mrface water runoff devices or other entirelv artificial watercourses unless ss th v are used by salmonids or used to convey streams occurring prior to construction of such watercourses, but is intended to include creeks sloughs and rivers The channel or bed of a stream does not have to contain water all year long for the reach to be considered a stream. Streams are further cate2orized as follows a Class 1 Streams - those streams inventoried as "Shorelines of the State" under the City of Kent Shoreline Master Program. Kent City Code Chapter-] 1 04 pursuant to RCW Chapter 90 58 11 1 h Cia» ;.y,t;ea, stream smaller than Class 1 Streams that f ow year around during eriods of normal rainfall, or those streams_t are used by salmonids. Class ss 3 Streams those streams that are intermittent or ephemeral arin2 years of normal rainfall and are not used by salmonids. ToU of Bank That p inert along a slope channel or stream where the change in slope along the highest elevations at top of the slope. channel, or stream changes to a slops of less percent: this is usually a line easily seen while observing the bank or slope. Variance to Stream Buffer Standards An adjustment in the application of these stream buffer regulations to a particular piece of propea in a situation where the property is otherwise deprived of all reasonable use of the property. stream A variance to � buffer regulations shall not be used to nvey speeial_ rrivile es not Pnioved b; or ther properties in the saw vicinity and zone which are subiect to the same standards and rode restrictions, A variance to stream buffer regulations must be authorized in writing by the Director and shall be the minimum remedy necessary t4 permit reasonable use of the property. Vegetation Any and all organic plant life growing at below or above the soil surface. Stream Buffer Standards, Stream Buffer Widths, 1 All buff rs shall be measured from the ordinary high water mark as identified in the field or if that cannot be determined from the top of the bank In braided channels the ordinary high water mark or top of bank shall be determined so as to include the entire stream feature. 2 The following-buffers on each side of the ordinary high water mark are minimum requirements. 1 Class 1 Streams - 100 foot buffer. 12 ii Class 2 Streams used by salmonids - 100 foot buffer, Class 2 Streams - 50 foot buffer. iv Class 3 Streams - 25 foot buffer. .vL Ditches - 10 foot buffer. vi When the ordinary high water mark of any stream is within 25 feet of the toe of slopes greater to or equal than 15 percent the following minimum buffers shall be provided; L Where the horizontal length of the slope including small benches and terraces is within the buffer for that stream class, the buffer shall be the larger of: a) the minimum buffer for that stream class: or h) 25 feet beyond the top of the slope. L Where the horizontal lenzh of the slope extends beyond the minimum buffer for that stream class, the buffer shall extend to a point 25 feet bevond the minimum buffer for that stream class. yijl Any stream adioined by riparian wetland or other adjacent sensitive area shall have the buffer which applies to the wetland or other adjacent sensitive area unless the stream buffer requirements are more expansive. vLL Any stream restored relocated replaced or enhance because of alterations should have at least the minimum buffer required for the class of strum involved. The Director may authorize buffer averaging es ep cially in instances where it will provide additional resource protection provided that the total area on-site contained in the buffer remains the same or larger after averaging. 4 The determination of salmonid use shall be made by the Director based an the best available, past and present information_gathered by the ity, its agents and other entities withiurisdiction or expertise relating to ;almonid presence or absence during any life stage. 13 Stream buffers shall be managed as Native Growth Protection Areas and shall generally remain undisturbed except forenhancement planting f2rojects. Additional buffer requirements for streams. The Planning Department may require increased stream buffer widths as necessary to protect streams The additional bufferths and other issues shall he determined by criteria set forth in administrative rules and include. but are not limited to critical drainage areas location or management of hazardous wastes critical fish and wildlife habitat and the location of trail or utility corridors. c S nsitive Area Tracts Sensitive Area Tracts shall be used to protect all streams and buffers in or a djacent to proposals for developments such as subdivisions commercial deveinnment or binding site plan of all kinds and shall be recorded on all documents of title of record for all affected lots Any required Sensitive Area Tract shall either be deeded or dedicated to the benefit of the City of Kent The width of the sensitive area tract shall depend on the stream classification and buffer requirement. Building Setback Areas, Sensitive Area Setback Areas shall delineate streams steel2s�nes adiS ne t to Streams wetlands adjacent to streams and required buffers in development proposals for building permits short subdivisions subdivisions binding "ite plans n grading permits The setback area shall be identified on a recorded site plan or in recorded documents filed as an a requirement of this section Unless otherwise specified in this section a minimum building setback line of 15 feet shall be required from the edge of the stream buffer._ Prohibitions on the use of hazardous or toxic substances and pesticides or certain fertilizers in this area may be imposed. 14 e. Allowed Alterations to Streams and Buffers. 1 The following stream crossings may be permitted only with approved mitigation plans. and may be allowed only if they meet the following requirements: jL All crossings shall be constructed during summer low flow and shall be timed to avoid stream disturbance during period, when use is critical to salmonids: ii Crossings shall not occur over salmonid spawning areas unless no other possible crossing site exists: idL Crossings shall not diminish the flood carrying capacity of the stream: iv L Underground utility crossing shall be located at a minimum depth of four feet below the maximum projected del2th of scour for the base flood as determined by professional civil eneineer licensed by the State of Washington: and vL The applicant shall obtain approval from the Department of Natural Resources and from the Department of Fish and Game for all crossings of a Class 1 stream. vi The applicant shall obtain an Hydraulics Project Approval, or a written waiver therefrom, from the State Department of Fish and Wildlife for all crossings. 2 Construction of public and private trails may be allowed in stream buffers only u op n adoption of administrative rules and pursuant to the following- guidelines: 2 Trail surfaces shall not be of impervious materials, except that impervious public multi-purpose trails like the Soos Creek Trail may be allowed if they meet all other requirements including water quality: and ii Where trails are provided. buffers shall be expanded, where possible. Construction of utilities shall be permitted in stream buffers only when no reasonable alternative location is available. 15 4_ Class 1 streams may not be relocated but Class 2 and Class 3 stream relocations may be allowed, rp ovidinp- mitigation is provided for all impacts^they. meet all requirempnts: and are approved by all agencies with jurisdiction. For any stream relocatiQn, theapplicant must demonstrate based on information prQvided by a civil engineer and-a qualified biologist that: 1 The equivalent base flood storage volume and function will be maintained. ii There will be no detrimental increase or decrease in stream velocity: iii There will be no interbasin transfer of water: IvI Performance standards as set out in the miti atg ion Ian n are met: yL The relocation conforms to other applicable laws: vil All work will be carried out under the direct supervision of a Qualified biologist. 4 livestock r strictions adjacent to streams and wetlands. The following standards apply to all parcels with streams flowing through or adjacent to them and are intended to allow the raising of livestock in the City of Kent while minimizing the adverse impacts on water quality and salmonid fisheries habitat in City of Kent watersheds. Maximum Livestock Densities. y A maximum of six large livestock per gross acre. or the equivalent of six large livestock per gross acre as defined in the definitions section of this ordinance. 2 No large liv stock shall be permitted on any lot smaller than 20,000 square feet in area except that the portion of the lot used for confinement or grazing may be less than 20 000 square feet providing that the portion of the lot used for confinement or brazing meets the requirements of farm management standards section of these regulations. 16 Farm Management Standards. Pro e�rty owners with livestock on farms adjacent to. or containing streams, shall meet the following minimum standards: 1 Livestock Watering, Wetland and Stream Corridor Management Options, 0 Livestock fencing shall be used as necessary to prevent livestock access to all streams, wetlands, and their buffers. ii The preferred watering option shall be a domestic water suR2y, stock watering pond, roof runoff collection system, or an aQ rp oved Quml2 supply from the stream so that livestock are not required to enter streams for their water supply. iii Livestock access to all streams and their buffers shall be limited to stream crossing and watering points which prevent free access along the length of the streams. iv L Livestock crossings of streams shall be limited to a single point no wider than 25 feet. Livestock watering points shall be designed in such a manner as to minimize adverse impacts to the stream. viL Bridges designed to allow free flow of flood waters may be used in lieu of stream crossings, provided that piers and abutments shall not be placed within the ordinary_ high water mark or tort of bank whichever is greater. vii Crossings of wetlands and their buffers is not permitted. 2 Grazing and Pasture, Confinement and Manure Management. A Livestock fencing shall be used to establish and maintain all buffers, ii Existing razing and confinement area, shall maintain a fenced vegetative buffer of at least 50 feet from any naturally occurring pond. wetland edge. or the ordinary_high water mark of all streams 17 Existing Rr zing and confinement areas which do not meet the minimum width of fencedvegetative buffers required by this chapter shall be mpdified as necessaQ/ to prpvide the buffers specified within five years of the effective date of this ordinance. iv Forested lands being cleared for grazing areas and new grazing areas shall comply with the s nnsitive area Setbacks for Class 1 Class 2 and Class 3 streams,.and wetlands. vL The grazing area buffer for Class 1 and Class 2 streams with salmonids may be reduced to 50 feet where a 50 foot width of diverse mature vegetation already exists in the buffer area. This buffer reduction may not be used when forested lands are being cleared for grazing areas v iL Fencing installed pursuant to King County's Sensitive Areas Ordinance prior to the effective date of this ordinance, at setbacks other than those specified above shall be deemed to be in compliance to the requirements of this section. vii Grazing areas may extend to the property line, that all streams or wetlands adjacent to the property line the minimum buffers established in these regulations. viii L Manure storage areas shall be managed as follows• 11 Surface water flows shall be diverted away from Manure storage areas. 2) During the winter months of October 15 to April 15. all manure stockpiled within 200 feet uphill from any Class 1 or Class 2 stream or wetland shall be covered in a manner that excludes precipitation and allows free flow of air to minimize fire danger: OR alternatively shall be placed in an uncovered concreter or manure lagoon or held for pickup in a covered dnmpster, vehicle or other facile designed to prevent leachate from reaching any streams or wetlands. 3L Manure shall he stored in a location that avoids having_ runoff from manure enter streams or wetlands. 41 Manure piles shall not be any closer than 50 feet uphill from any wetland buffer, the ordinary high water mark of any stream or any ditch to which the topography would generally direct runoff from the manure nor within any stream buffer. 18 5L Manure shall not be spread on frozen or saturated fields• -6� Manure shall not be piled within any stream buffer Existing Livestock Operations. All existing livestock operations shall meet the farm management standards of this ordinance within five vears of the effective date of this ordinance except that existing buildings are exempt from this provision State standards for fecal coliform turbidity, and nutrients must be met within five nears from the effective date of the ordinance adopting these regulations. Exemptions, The Planning Director may grant exemptions from these stream buffer regulations provided that the exemption is consistent with the general purposes of these reaulations and the public interest An application for a sensitive areas reasonable use exemption shall be filed with the Planning Department and the Planning Director shall issue a final decision pursuant to the provisions of this chanter. a� Criteria. The Planning Director, in granting an exemption for reasonable use must determine that: l Apphcation of these stream buffer regulations would deny all reasonable use of the property: and y There is no other reasonable use with less impact on the sensitive area: and 3� The proposed development does not pose an unreasonable threat to the public health safety or welfare on or off the proposed development site: and. 4 Any alterations permitted to these sensitive areas shall be the minimum necessary to allow for reasonable use of the ,_ Any authorized alteration of a sensitive area under this section shall be subject to conditions established by the Director, and 19 shall require mitigation and or enhancement under approved mitigation plans. Public Works The application of these stream buffer regulations shall not prohibit public works within or adjacent to sensitive areas if the Planning Director d.etermin ss theapplication would prohibit _ v lopmQnt by a public agency or public utility that is necessary to the public health, safety, or welfare. The Planning Director may grant an exemption based on the following criteria: There is no reasonable alternative to the rprposed development with less impact on the sensitive area: and b, Thpproposal minimizes the impact on sensitive areas and the applicant provides restoration/enhancement of any and all disturbed areas, 7 Conflicting, Standards Where inconsistencies occur in the application of this Soos Creek Basin Stream Buffer overt zone together with other buffer or setback regulations in the Kent City Code the more restrictive regulation shall apply. Enforcement/Interpretation The Cites Planning Director and directed to enforce all of the provisions of these stream buffer regulations The Planning Director shall also have the rower to render interpretations and to adopt rule5 and regulations for these standards in order to clariL the application of these provisions The Planning Director's interpretations rules and regulations. however, shall be in conformance with the intent and purpose of these stream buffer standards and shall be in writing, g� Amendment of Appendices The ity's Planning Director is authorized to amend the appendices to the stream buffers from time to time to time as he or she shall deem necessary 20 However any amendments to the aonendices shall conform with the intent and the purpose of these stream buffer regulations. 9JE. Exceptions. 1. Low hazard areas. Development within seventy-five (75) to one hundred fifty (150) feet of the top of a ravine through which a major or minor creek passes may be permitted under the existing zoning requirements if it can be demonstrated to the planning director that water quality and quantity will not be impacted. 2. Severe hazard areas. A fifty-foot setback from the ordinary high-water mark of any major creek is required. Impervious surfaces may be allowed a maximum of twenty (20) percent closer to the ordinary high-water mark of a major creek, if shading vegetation is presently located. 3. All hazard areas. The planning director shall have the authority to waive specific requirements or impose additional requirements in unique or special circumstances to ensure the fulfillment of the stated purpose of this chapter and to allow for flexibility and innovation of design. Special circumstances or unique conditions shall be reviewed with the planning director prior to submittal of the development plan. Examples of special conditions might include: a. Preservation of unique wildlife habitat. b. Preservation of natural or native areas. C. Compliance with special easements. d. Unique site uses. 4. Vehicular and pedestrian access. In situations where vehicular or pedestrian access cannot reasonably be provided by avoiding identified watercourses, then such access shall be allowed in the form of a vehicular or pedestrian bridge. Construction of any bridge shall be subject to the approval of the public works department regarding storm drainage and hydraulics, and guidelines and recommendations of the state department of fisheries and game. 21 SECTION 2._ If any one or more sections, sub-sections, or sentences of this Ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 3. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force five (5) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law. JIM WHITE, MAYOR ATTEST: BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: ROGER A. LUBOVICH, CITY ATTORNEY PASSED day of 1996. APPROVED day of 1996. PUBLISHED day of 1996. 22 hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No. passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the City of Kent as hereon indicated. (S EA L) BRENDA )ACOBER, CITY CLERK STREAM9.ORD 23 CITY Oil' KI', NT BOOS CRFE' K d7ASIii OVERLAY x� CB „"�n lrtR RIN F"� 1 P lvn dar,••r IT f_e 11 t P.I 1 v eIT I IF a x � ,��• �� i1.1� o .� .' slxa�. T r IF ' 41x )1 5L2LL[ IT , IT IT IF E PSO S.W 1 E.ZITI� r • � -� r e , =� IF LIT 1 Sri ml .2E 3 �,r IT e e 1.IT ILI IrL IT I'll?ILI 11 TnFe �L22 Ii£3L 51. c IF I e se x,i,r l f, y fir` �gyE } 4IT + aFy s.IFI '�s z 9 e, I z,e r! L 2 s IT ed_ d � f. IF IT sr IF xrn xre IT --Y- I IT T C a l �Fl a IF , 56� ,SZz,l5 IF 1\I\� l � IS I IF FAI I IF rl., nI I ILI IL a r [[ a P2 5� r fi h@K1}{n IF �� �ei,r73Sit,urn r A a r „ �aIkI 11 + . v IF [ -� _ - - 3t pnx � p _ zei It IF I IT IF s� Ala / / e,.xe e e J O SOOS CREEK 13nSIN OVII:MAY APkA / Z CA — O(> —1 I S'1'1NG C1'1'Y IJIN', FIT KIF;N'1' POTEN'i'1AI, ANNE'LIATION AREA NIAP CRI?A'I'FD BY KEN'I PLANNING DEPA1'11A1EN'1' j -X-111 B z11.' Kent City Council Meeting Date September 17 , 1996 Category Other Business 1. SUBJECT: VAN DOREN' S LANDING, BUILDING I, REZONE RZ-96-4 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: The Hearing Examiner has recommended approval of an application by Dan Ivanoff of MBK Northwest, to rezone approximately 11.93 acres of property from M-1, Industrial Park District, to MI-C, Industrial Park District - Commercial Suffix. The property is located at the southwest corner of the intersection of S. 228th Street and West Valley Highway. 3 . EXHIBITS: Staff report and Findings and Recommendations 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Hearing Examiner (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember r:: moves, Councilmember �� ,1. � seconds to accept/-rejactf i y the Findings of the Hearing Examiner, to adopt/re-j'ecttmed4-f-y the Hearing Examiner' s recommendation of approval of the Van Doren's Landing Building I Rezone No. RZ-96-4 , and to direct the City Attorney to prepare the necessary ordinance. DISCUSSION• ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 4B CITY OF )S�,1 21 Jim White, Mayor lm'nn"j Planning Department (206)859-3390/FAX(206) 850-2.544 James P. Harris,Planning Director OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER (206) 859-3390 Theodore P.Hunter Hearing Examiner FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION FILE NO: VAN DOREN'S LANDING BUILDING I ;#RZ-96-4 APPLICANT: Dan Ivanoff, Vice-President, MBK Northwest REQUEST: A request to rezone approximately 11.93 acres of property from M-1, Industrial Park District, to MI-C, Industrial Park District - Commercial Suffix. LOCATION: The property is located at the southwest comer of the intersection of S. 228th Street and West Valley Highway. APPLICATION FILED: March 29, 1996 DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE ISSUED: April 30, 1996 MEETING DATE: July 17, 1996 RECOMMENDATION ISSUED: July 31, 1996 RECOMMENDATION: APPROVAL with conditions STAFF REPRESENTATIVE: Fred N. Satterstrom, Planning Department Charlene Anderson, Planner Kristen Langley, Public Works Department PUBLIC TESTIMONY: Dan Ivanoff, applicant WRITTEN TESTIMONY: None EXHIBITS: I. Staff Report and File including: IA. Application, 1 B. Environmental Analysis, 1 1104ih AVE,SO. /FEN"r AA'AS I I INGTON 99W2-5895/TELEPHONId (10(,)859-3300/FAx H geq-3334 Findings and Recommendation Van Doren's Landing Building I #RZ-96-4 1 C. Departmental comments and, 1D. Affidavits of Notice of Public Hearing INTRODUCTION After due consideration of all the evidence presented at public hearing on the date indicated above, and following an unaccompanied personal inspection of the subject property and surrounding area by the Hearing Examiner at a time prior to the public hearing, the following findings, conclusions and recommendation are entered by the Hearing Examiner on this application. FINDINGS I. An application for a rezone was filed on March 29, 1996. The property proposed for a rezone is located at the southwest corner of the intersection of S. 22S`h Street and West Valley Highway and is known as "Van Doren's Landing Building No. I". Exhibit IA, Application. 2. The property is approximately 11.93 acres in size. The applicant proposes a rezone from "M-1" (Industrial Park District) to "MI-C" (Industrial Park District, Commercial Suffix) Exhibit IA. The proposed rezone would allow the applicant to develop the property with a wider range of retail uses than those authorized in an M-1 zone. Retail development of the site would be the only retail operations within the property development known as Van Doren's Landing where over 3,000 employees work each day. Exhibit IA, Application; Testimony of Ms. Charlene Anderson. 3. Property to the west, north and south of the site is zoned M-1. The subject property is surrounded by corporate offices, manufacturing and distribution businesses. Exhibit 1, Staff Report; Site View. 4. The City Comprehensive Plan Map designates the site as Industrial. Specific policies within the Comprehensive Plan specifically address the subject property by identifying "expansion of retail opportunities"within the"M-1 Industrial Park district"as a priority. Exhibit 1, Staff Report, pages 4-5. 5. Development of the site with retail uses such as a mini-mart or deli is associated with this rezone proposal. Application. Preliminary information suggests that transportation impacts can be mitigated and that there are all required public utilities available to the site to support retail development. No concerns were expressed by any member of the public during the hearing. Exhibit 1, Staff Report. 2 Findings and Recommendation Van Doren's Landing Building I #RZ-96-4 6. A final Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance was issued for this proposal on April 30, 1996. Conditions related to traffic mitigation, road improvements, wetland buffers, water quality and stormwater drainage were attached to the Mitigated Determination ci Nonsignificance (MDNS). The MDNS- was not appealed. Exhibit IB; Testimony of Charlene Anderson. 7. Since the existing zoning designation of M-1 was applied in 1959, the city has experienced rapid growth and development. The Growth Management Act required the City to re- examine its planning guidelines and development regulations for the City. In 1995, the City identified a need to provide retail outlets to the more than 30,000 employees who are drawn to the City each day. These employees often are working in an industrial park where the only available retail outlets are not within walking distance. Exhibit 1, Staff Report; Application. 8. A public hearing was held on this application on July 17, 1996. Notice of the public hearing was posted on the site, published in the newspaper and mailed to persons living near the site. Exhibit ID, Affidavits of Notice. The public hearing was attended by a representative of the City and the applicant. The City presented a recommendation to approve the rezone request with conditions. Exhibit 1, Staff Report; Testimony of Charlene Anderson. The applicant presented testimony in support of the rezone request. Testimony of Dan Ivanoff. No one testified or submitted any evidence against the rezone request at the public hearing. All testimony and evidence presented prior to and during the public hearing supported approval of the rezone request. CONCLUSIONS Jurisdiction and Authoritv The Hearing Examiner has jurisdiction to hold a public hearing on this quasi-judicial rezone, and to issue a written recommendation for final action to the Council, pursuant to RCW 35A.63.170 and Chapters 2.32 and 15.09 of the Kent City Code. Section 15.09.050 (A)(3) of the Kent Zoning Code sets forth the standards and criteria the Examiner must use to evaluate a request for a rezone. A request for a rezone shall only be granted if: a. The proposed rezone is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; b. The proposed rezone and subsequent development of the site would be compatible with development in the vicinity; 3 Findings and Recommendation Van Doren's Landing Building I #RZ-96-4 C. The proposed rezone will not unduly burden the transportation system in the vicinity of the property with significant adverse impacts which cannot be mitigated; d. Circumstances have changed substantially since the establishment of the current zoning district to warrant the proposed rezone; e. The proposed rezone will not adversely affect the health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Kent. Based on the Findings specified above, the Examiner makes the following conclusions: Consistency with Comprehensive Plan CONCLUSION 1: The proposed rezone is consistent with the both the City Comprehensive Plan Map and Policies. 1.1 The designation of Commercial on the comprehensive plan map indicates the proposal is consistent with the vision of the future adopted by the City Council. The uses allowed in a M1-C zone are compatible with those contemplated in the comprehensive plan under the Industrial classification and under policy LU-16.4. Finding of Fact eVo. 4. 1.2 The Examiner must also consider the policies of the comprehensive plans as well as the map designations. The Comprehensive Plan includes written policies to encourage retail development within industrial park areas. The proposed rezone is consistent with these policies. Finding of Fact No.4 . Compatibility with Development in the Vicinity CONCLUSION 2: The potential development associated with the rezone proposal would be compatible with the existing development in the vicinity of the proposed rezone. The proposed rezone is in an area of manufacturing, light industrial and office park development. The proposed rezone would be consistent with this surrounding development. The type of development authorized under the proposed zone is just as compatible with the existing development than is the type of development authorized under the current zone. Finding of Fact No.3. Burden on Transportation System CONCLUSION 3: The proposed rezone would not unduly burden the transportation system 4 Findings and Recommendation Van Doren's Landing Building I #RZ-96-4 3.1 The traffic impacts associated with the potential development of the proposed rezone will be reviewed by the City as part of the environmental review of any development proposal that may be associated with the rezone. Preliminary analysis by the Public Works Department indicates that there are no traffic impacts associated with the a development proposal that cannot be mitigated at the time of the application for a specific development. Findings of Fact No. 5. Change of Circumstances CONCLUSION 4: Circumstances have changed substantially since the establishment of the existing zone to warrant the proposed rezone. There have been significant changes in land use activity in the city in the last few years since the passage of the Growth Management Act. The proposed zoning designation reflects the changing nature of development in the City. The Comprehensive Plan developed under the Growth Management Act stresses the need to develop services within walking distance of those who use them in order to reduce vehicle traffic in the City. This rezone is proposed at this time because of the changes in planning policies within the City adopted during June, 1996. Finding of Fact No. 7. Health Safetv and Welfare of the Citizens of Kent CONCLUSION 5: The proposed rezone would not adversely affect the general welfare of the citizens of Kent in the area surrounding the proposed rezone. No one presented any evidence of any nature against this rezone proposal. The Hearing Examiner must conclude that the proposed rezone would not have any adverse affect on anyone in the area surrounding the rezone. Finding of Fact No. 8. RECOMMENDATION Based on the above Findings and Conclusions, the Examiner recommends the City Council APPROVE this request for a rezone with conditions. Conditions of approval are necessary to address potential impacts of the proposal including traffic impacts that may result from development of the property with retail uses. It is the Examiner's opinion that the rezone request,with conditions, meets the criteria for approval established by the Council and should be approved with the following conditions: 1. The developer shall execute an environmental mitigation agreement to financially participate in, and pay a fair share of the costs associated with the construction of the South 224th/228th Street Corridor project. Because this is a rezone of the property, and represents a fundamental change in the land-use assumptions, any trips above those for the existing land use assumptions shall be mitigated at the full Corridor Participation rate of$1960 per PM 5 Findings and Recommendation Van Doren's Landing Building I #RZ-96-4 peak hour trip. The minimum benefit to the above development is estimated at$505,680 (in 1986 dollars) based upon 22 PM peak hour trips at$980 per PM peak trip, and 247 PM peak hour trips at the full participation rate of$1,960 per PM peak trip, entering and leaving the site and the capacity of the South 224th/228th Street Corridor. Note: If the applicant or successor develops the property with a use allowed in the M-1 zone, the additional mitigation associated with a use allowed in the MI-C zone shall no longer be required as a condition of the rezone approval. 2. As a consequence of the significant change in land use and trip generation from the site, the developer shall extend the exclusive eastbound right turn lane at the intersection of South 228th Street at West Valley Highway, to provide a combined right-turn/deceleration lane to no less than 100-feet west of any access point for this project, including: a) The developer shall deed sufficient right of way across the easterly frontage of the property on South 228th Street to widen the roadway to add a 12-foot wide right- turn lane. This deed of right of way shall be based upon a survey to be performed by a licensed land surveyor of the subject property and South 228th Street, and shall delineate clearly the existing public right of way, curb lines, and public improvements on South 228th Street, and the additional right of way needed to widen South 228th Street as noted. The total right of way required, as measured from centerline of the street to property line, shall be at least 52 feet. In addition, this shall include a grant of a 13-foot wide sidewalk and slope easement behind the new right- of-way line. b) The developer shall acquire an easement from the adjoining property owner to widen the roadway to construct these improvements. c) The developer shall construct a continuous right-turn/deceleration lane across the easterly property frontage on South 228th Street. The deceleration lane shall extend a minimum distance of 100 feet [not including a minimum 50-foot bay taper transition] to the west of the easterly project driveway, as measured from the point of curb return for the driveway. The minimum width of the deceleration lane shall be 12 feet. The construction of this right-turn/deceleration lane shall include concrete curbs, gutters, and 6.5-foot wide concrete sidewalks. The paving section for this lane shall be to the full requirements of the City's Construction Standards for a Minor Arterial. 6 Findings and Recommendation Van Doren's Landing Building I #RZ-96-4 d) The developer shall extend the raised median barrier on South 228th Street, easterly. 2A. If the developer is unable to acquire the easement from the adjoining property ovm r, the following conditions shall apply: a) The developer shall deed sufficient right of way across the easterly frontage of th.- property, on South 228th Street to widen the roadway to add a 12-foot wide right. turn lane. This deed of right of way shall be based upon a survey to be performed by a licensed land surveyor of the subject property and South 228th Street, and shall delineate clearly the existing public right of way, curb lines, and public improvements on South 228th Street, and the additional right of way needed to widen South 228th Street as noted. The total right of way required, as measured from centerline of the street to property line shall be at least 52 feet. In addition, this shall include a grant of a 13-foot wide sidewalk and slope easement behind the new right- of-way line. b) The developer shall construct a continuous right-turn/deceleration lane across the easterly property frontage on South 228th Street. The deceleration lane shall extend a minimum distance of 100 feet [not including a minimum 50-foot bay taper transition] to the west of the easterly project driveway, as measured from the point of curb return for the driveway. The minimum width of the deceleration lane shall be 12 feet. c) The developer shall deposit the construction cost: design engineering, and construction; of the remaining portion of the turn lane: from the easterly driveway to the existing tum-lane at West Valley Highway. 3. The developer shall comply with all other applicable conditions of the Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance for 4ENV-96-31. Dated this 31 st day of July, 1996. Theodore Paul Hunter for JAMES M. DRISCOLL Hearing Examiner, Pro Tern 7 Findings and Recommendation Van Doren's Landing Building I #RZ-96-4 APPEALS FROM HEARING EXAMINER DECISIONS. Request of Reconsideration (Section 2.32.140) Any aggrieved person may request a reconsideration of a decision or recommendation by the Hearing Examiner is based on erroneous procedures, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably be available at the time of the hearing, may make a written request for reconsideration by the Hearing Examiner within fourteen (14) days of the date the decision or recommendation is rendered. This request shall set forth the specific errors or new information relied upon by such appellant, and the Hearing Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. Reconsideration requests should be addressed to: Hearing Examiner, 220 Fourth Avenue S., Kent, WA 98032. Reconsiderations are answered in writing by the Hearing Examiner. Notice of RiQht to Appeal (Excerpt from Section 2.32.150) No appeal may be made from a recommendation of the Hearing Examiner. c:rz964.fin 8 Y CITY OF Jim White, Mayor Planning Department (206) 859-3390/FAX(206) 850-2544 James P. Harris,Planning Director KENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT (206) 859-3390 STAFF REPORT FOR HEARING EXAMINER MEETING OF JULY 17, 1996 3:00 PM FILE NO: VAN DOREN'S LANDING BUILDING I 4RZ-96-4 APPLICANT: Dan Ivanoff, Vice President MBK Northwest REQUEST: A request to rezone approximately 11.93 acres of property from M-1,Industrial Park District,to Ml-C,Industrial Park District, Commercial Suffix STAFF REPRESENTATIVE: Charlene Anderson, Planner STAFF RECOMMENDATION: APPROVAL I. GENERAL INFORMATION A. Description of the Proposal The applicant proposes to rezone approximately 11.93 acres from the current zoning of M-1, Industrial Park District, to MI-C, Industrial Park District, Commercial Suffix. B. Location The subject property is located at the southwest corner of the intersection of S. 228th Street and West Valley Highway. C. Size of Property The subject property contains approximately 11.93 acres. 1 2-0 4th AVE.SO- /KENT.WASHINGTON 98032 5895/TELEPHONE f2061859-3300/FAX k 859-3334 Staff Report Van Doren's Landing Building I Rezone #RZ-96-4 D. Zonima Property surrounding the parcel is zoned M-1, Industrial Park District. E. Land Use Land Use in the area consists of corporate offices, manufacturing and warehouse/distribution. A veterinarian clinic occupies a small parcel to the northeast of the subject property. F. History The subject property was annexed to the City of Kent as part of a 2,990-acre annexation on February 28, 1959 via Ordinance No. 1013. In 1986, the area was included in the West Vallev Industrial Studv which identified three major intersections in Kent's industrial area as "...logical locations for permitting a wider range of retail uses..." These uses would "...respond to the personal and service needs of 30,000 plus employees who are drawn to the City each day..." Allowing more flexibility for retail uses in the M-1 district was considered anew by the City Council Planning Committee on April 4, 1995 and that committee voted unanimously to add policy LU-16.4 to the Land Use Element of the Kent Comprehensive Plan. Through an inadvertent omission,that policy was not adopted by the City Council until June 18, 1996 via Ordinance No. 3302. II. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS A. Environmental Assessment A final mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance (MDNS 4ENV-96-31) for the rezone was issued on April 30, 1996. The MDNS is part of the record. B. Significant Phvsical Features 1. Topography and Vegetation The site is generally flat and largely consists of wetland area. Only approximately 1.769 acres is usable area. 2 Staff Report Van Doren's Landing Building I Rezone 4RZ-96-4 C. SiQnificant Social Features 1. Street Svstem The property has access to S. 228th Street, which is classified a Minor Arterial. The street has a public right-of-way width of 60 feet, and the actual width of paving is 60 feet. The street is improved with asphalt paving, curb and gutter, stormwater drainage, sidewalks, and street lighting. The current average daily traffic count on this street is 9,800 vehicle trips per day. Mitigation of traffic impacts was considered under the environmental review of this project, and additional mitigating conditions are included in the staff recommendation. 2. Water and Sanitary Sewer Svstems An existing 12-inch water line and an 8-inch sanitary sewer are available to serve the subject property. 3. Stormwater System An on-site detention system and storm water treatment system may be required upon receipt of an application for development of this property. 4. LID'S The subject property is covered by LID 330 for 64th Avenue Street Improvements and LID 327 for 68th Avenue (West Valley Highway) Street Improvements. 5. Parks This proposal does not affect the parks system. III. CONSULTED DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES The following departments and agencies were advised of this application: Chief of Staff City Attorney 3 Staff Report Van Doren's Landing Building I Rezone 4RZ-96-4 Fire Chief City Clerk Chief of Police Development Services/Fire Prevention Director of Public Works Parks and Recreation Director In addition to the above, all persons owning property which lies within 200 feet of the site were notified of the application and of the public hearing. Staff comments have been incorporated into the staff report where applicable. IV. PLANNING DEPARTMENT REVIEW A. Comprehensive Plan In 1995, the Kent City Council adopted the Kent Comprehensive Plan, which represented a complete revision to the City's 1977 comprehensive plan. The 1995 plan was prepared under the provisions of the Washington State Growth Management Act. The Comprehensive Plan, through its goals and policies,presents a clear expression of the City's vision of growth for citizens, the development community, and other public agencies. The plan is used by the Mayor, City Council, Land Use and Planning Board, Hearing Examiner, and City departments to guide decisions on amendments to the City's zoning code and other development regulations, which must be consistent with the plan, and also guide decisions regarding the funding and location of capital improvement projects. The Land Use Element of the plan contains a Land Use Plan Map, which designates the type and intensity of land uses throughout the city, as well as in the entire potential annexation area. The GMA Kent Comprehensive Plan designates the project site Industrial. The proposal supports Policy LU-16.4, "To expand retail opportunities to provide necessary personal and business services for the general industrial area, implement the recommendations of the West Valley Industrial study regarding potential areas for expanded retail opportunities for properties within the M1 Industrial Park district." 4 Staff Report Van Doren's Landing Building I Rezone 9RZ-96-4 B. STANDARDS AND CRITERIA FOR GRANTING A REQUEST FOR REZONE According to Kent City Code Section 15.09.O50.C, "The following standards and criteria shall be used by the hearing examiner and city council to evaluate a request for rezone. Such an amendment shall only be granted if the city council determines that the request is consistent with these standards and criteria." 1. The proposed rezone is consistent with the comprehensive plan. Planning Department Comment: See IV.A., above. 2. The proposed rezone and subsequent development of the site would be compatible with development in the vicinity. Planning_Department Comment: Allowing flexibility in retail uses at the proposed location would offer additional services to the thousands of employees who work in the industrial area of the City and thus would be compatible with development in the vicinity of the site. 3. The proposed rezone will not unduly burden the transportation system in the vicinity of the property with significant adverse impacts which cannot be mitigated. Planning_Department Comment: Mitigation of impacts to the traffic system were considered during environmental review of the proposal. Additional mitigating conditions are included as part of the staff recommendation for this proposal. 4. Circumstances have changed substantially since the establishment of the current zoning district to warrant the proposed rezone. Planning Department Comment: As stated on page 80 of the West Valley Industrial Study, "...The nature of Kent's industrial base is changing as it matures...Today's development pattern is more mixed. Service-type industries and office uses represent a larger and larger share of 5 Staff Report Van Doren's Landing Building I Rezone #RZ-96-4 development proposals. A demand for retail and personal service uses has also resulted from the tremendous influx of employees into the City's industrial area...". 5. The proposed rezone will not adversely affect the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the city. Planning Department Comment: The proposed rezone will not adversely affect the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the city. It will offer additional retail and personal services to the employees in the industrial areas of the city. V. CITY STAFF RECOMMENDATION Upon review of the merits of this request and the code criteria for granting approval of a rezone, the staff recommends APPROVAL of Van Doren's Landing Building I Rezone #RZ-96-4, with the following conditions: 1. The developer shall execute an environmental mitigation agreement to financially participate in, and pay a fair share of the costs associated with the construction of the South 224th/228th Street Corridor project. Because this is a rezone of the property, and represents a fundamental change in the land-use assumptions, any trips above those for the existing land use assumptions shall be mitigated at the full Corridor Participation rate of$1960 per PM peak hour trip. The minimum benefit to the above development is estimated at $505,680 (in 1986 dollars) based upon 22 PM peak hour trips at $980 per PM peak trip, and 247 PM peak hour trips at the full participation rate of$1960 per PM peak trip, entering and leaving the site and the capacity of the South 224th/228th Street Corridor. 2. As a consequence of the significant change in land use and trip generation from the site, the developer shall extend the exclusive eastbound right turn lane at the intersection of South 228th Street at West Valley Highway, to provide a combined right-turn/deceleration lane to no less than 100-feet west of any access point for this project, including: a) The developer shall deed sufficient right of way across the easterly frontage of the property, on South 228th Street to widen the roadway to add a 12-foot wide right-turn lane. This deed of right of way shall be based upon a survey to be performed by a licensed land surveyor of the subject property and South 228th Street, and shall delineate clearly the existing public right of way, curb 6 Staff Report Van Doren's Landing Building I Rezone 4RZ-96-4 lines, and public improvements on South 228th Street, and the additional right of way needed to widen South 228th Street as noted. The total right of way required, as measured from centerline of the street to property line, shall be at least 52 feet. In addition, this shall include a grant of a 13-foot wide sidewalk and slope easement behind the new right-of-way line. b) The developer shall acquire an easement from the adjoining property owner to widen the roadway to construct these improvements. C) The developer shall construct a continuous right-turn/deceleration lane across the easterly property frontage on South 228th Street. The deceleration lane shall extend a minimum distance of 100 feet [not including a minimum 50- foot bay taper transition] to the west of the easterly project driveway, as measured from the point of curb return for the driveway. The minimum width of the deceleration lane shall be 12 feet. The construction of this right-turn/deceleration lane shall include concrete curbs, gutters, and 6.5-foot wide concrete sidewalks. The paving section for this lane shall be to the full requirements of the City's Construction Standards for a Minor Arterial. d) The developer shall extend the raised median barrier on South 228th Street, easterly. 2A. If the developer is unable to acquire the easement from the adjoining property owner, then the following conditions shall apply: a) The developer shall deed sufficient right of way across the easterly frontage of the property, on South 228th Street to widen the roadway to add a 12-foot wide right-turn lane. This deed of right of way shall be based upon a survey to be performed by a licensed land surveyor of the subject property and South 228th Street, and shall delineate clearly the existing public right of way, curb lines, and public improvements on South 228th Street, and the additional right of way needed to widen South 228th Street as noted. The total right of way required, as measured from centerline of the street to property line shall be at least 52 feet. In addition, this shall include a grant of a 13-foot wide sidewalk and slope easement behind the new right-of-way line. b) The developer shall construct a continuous right-turn/deceleration lane across the easterly property frontage on South 228th Street. The deceleration lane 7 Staff Report Van Doren's Landing Building I Rezone #RZ-96-4 shall extend a minimum distance of 100 feet [not including a minimum 50- foot bay taper transition] to the west of the easterly project driveway, as measured from the point of curb return for the driveway. The minimum width of the deceleration lane shall be 12 feet. c) The developer shall deposit the construction cost: design engineering, and construction; of the remaining portion of the turn lane: from the easterly driveway to the existing tum-lane at West Valley Highway. 3. The developer shall comply with all other applicable conditions of the Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance for ENV-96-31. KENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT July 8, 1996 ch:rz964.rpt 8 City of Kent - Planning Department 5 220 5T Ln ¢ c r m S 224 57 d S 226 ST co (. N PL C > Cr r am LO P NG _ r z ¢ c� 5 234 ST Ell N w w Y > G p� J 5 236 ST POyO H CLO T ST FS 38 S r z OF B V W JA-f E S ST in APPLICATION NAME: Van Doren's Landing NUMBER: #RZ-96-4 DATE: July 3, 1996 REQUEST: Rezone LEGEND N Application site Vicinity Map r--}—i--+ Railroad tracks r-r-r-r-r-r-r-r City Limits City of Kent - Planning Department APPLICATION NAME: Van Doren's Landing NUMBER: #RZ-96-4 DATE: July 3, 1996 REQUEST: Rezone LEGEND N Application site Zoning/Topography Zoning boundary ��� City Limits City of Kent - Planning Department i <I.0 Rom' - a BUILDING I ,TID n i 1 21.3:11 SF 1 i i _L APPLICATION NAME: Van Doren's Landing NUMBER: #RZ-96-4 DATE: July 3, 1996 REQUEST: Rezone LEGEND Application site Site Plan Kent City council Meeting Date_ September 17 , 1996 Category Other Business 1. SUBJECT: GREEN RIVER ANNEXATION AN-96-2 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: This date has been set for a meeting with the initiators of the Green River Annexation, an area of approximately 595 acres located south of the Green River and north of S. 277th Street. Staff recommends that the Council accept the 10$ annexation petition and authorize circulation of the 60% petition subject to the City's existing indebtedness. 3 . EXHIBITS: Staff report, vicinity maps, Notice of Intention to Commerce 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Staff (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember nZpve%', Councilmember seconds to accept/reject the 10% annexation petition and authorize circulation of the 60$ petition subject to the City' s existing indebtedness. %%- DISCUSSION: ACTION• Council Agenda i Item No. 4C OTHER BUSINESS ITEM 4C GREEN RIVER ANNEXATION MOVE: That the proposed Green River Annexation Area boundaries be established as presented by staff; That 60% petition for annexation as set forth in RCW 35A.14.120 be authorized for circulation in the Green River Annexation Area; That the area, upon annexation, be subject to its proportionate share of the existing indebtedness of the City of Kent; and That the area be subject to the interim zoning requirements for newly annexed areas set forth in the Kent City Code. CITY OF �:1'JS�JG Jim White, Mayor PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM To: MAYOR JIM WHITE AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS From: TAMES P. HARRIS, PLANNING DIRECTOR Date: SEPTEMBER 12, 1996 Subject: CITY COUNCIL MEETING WITH ANNEXATION PETITIONERS OF 10 PERCENT OF THE ASSESSED VALUATION IN THE PROPOSED GREEN RIVER ANNEXATION - AN-96-2 Meeting Date: TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 17, 1996 IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS WEST AT KENT CITY HALL RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council accept the 10% annexation petition and recommends that the Council authorize circulation of the 60% petition subject to the City's existing indebtedness. I. Names of Applicants Darrell and Bonnie Omdorff 26720 94th Place South Kent WA 98031 II. Location The proposed annexation is generally located south and west of the Green River as follows: * The western boundary follows the easterly side of the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad south from the existing City boundary across the Green River to South 277th Street. At South 277th Street the boundary goes easterly across South Central Avenue and across the Green River to the existing City boundary. 221111h AV I1.SU., !KI:NT.WAS I I ING1`0N 98032-"95/'FEI A-PIIUNF 1211618 1 F.%X H 459-111.4 Meeting with Green River Annexation Petitioners September 12, 1996 Page 2 * The annexation boundary then goes northerly, following the existing City boundary and then westerly, following the Green River back to the point of beginning at the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad. III. Size of the Proposed Annexation The proposed annexation contains approximately 595 acres. IV. Background Information The proposed annexation lies in a predominately agricultural area where most of the area lying west of the Green River is in the King County Agricultural Preservation Program. There are approximately 15 single family residential dwellings in the proposed annexation area. The estimated population is 42 persons. V. County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning King County's Comprehensive Plan designates the proposed Green River annexation area as follows: East of the Green River Open space/recreation and green. belt/urban separator. West of the Green River Open space/recreation and agrit.alture. The County's zoning for this area is: East of the Green River R-1 Residential - one dwelling.unit per acre West of the Green River A-10 Agriculture, one dwelling unit per 10 acres Meeting with Green River Annexation Petitioners September 12, 1996 Page 3 VI. Kent's Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Kent's Growth Management Act Land Use Plan covers the proposed Green River annexation. The plan's land use designation east of the river is SF-1, one dwelling unit per acre and County owned land designated as community facility. The plan's land use designation west of the river is"Agriculture with County owned lands designated as community facility. Since the area of the Green River annexation is in unincorporated King County, there are no City designated zoning districts. However, the State Growth Management Act mandates that when zoning is applied to any area within the City, including a newly annexed area, zoning designations must follow the underlying comprehensive plan land use designations. When the Green River annexation becomes part of the City, staff will analyze existing County Comprehensive Plan land use designations to determine their appropriateness for Kent and will, after meeting with citizens in the affected area, make recommendations for any changes deemed appropriate to the City's Land Use and Planning Board. The Board will ultimately make a recommendation to the City Council who will make the final decisions as to what Comprehensive Plan land use designation will be placed on land in the Green River annexation area what the implementing zoning will be. VII. Fiscal Information The assessed valuation for the Green River Annexation is $5,625,574. The total estimated revenue from the annexation area is approximately $14,328 and is shown in the attached chart. At this time, the estimated expenditures are not complete. City departments are presently working with the City administration to determine staffing needs and anticipated capital expenditures. VIII. City's Annexation Policies In 1987 the City Council adopted policies that deal with annexations (Resolution 1150). A review of those policies indicates that the Green River annexation satisfies their intent. JPH/mp:a:an96.2 Attachments cc: Fred Satterstrom, Planning Manager -- ----- -- —---- I �79 RV �5—C F!E; __ RN RR ' ool 000l �I LO pa �e5�,avr--s R. ,Iu _ 0 _ t '✓ '- P 9 s m I _ _ S/ •'l m mw �, f�M L r�.N p gN pW Np 1 V v' w ''N1 11 "t f 'Icy 51 ti 3 S gal i� m o m in: 99 PL ":S lYlj HI 102 RVrn Lo im CITY OF KENT GREEN RIVER #" A�-j ei 2 FOR THE YEAR 1998-YEAR TWO Acres 16,110 595 Number Of Parcels 16.555 29 Total Number Of Res.Units 25,563 U 15 Total Estimated Population 59,641 P 42 Total Assessed Valuation 4,752.466,441 A 5.625.574 CRIMINAL CITYWIDE GENERAL CIP STREET JUSTICE STORM WATER OTHER REVENUE: BUDGE, FUND FUND FUND FUND FUND FUND FUND TOTAL Prop.Tax @ 2.81417(1) 11,618,041 A 8,181 81181 Voted Excess Levy Q.38533(1) 1,657,315 A 1,122 1,122 Prep.Tax-Annexed Street Q1.67 1,007,243 0 Sales Tax 14,285,311 O 0 Utility Tax(2) 5,229,060 U 1,502 1,502 Utility Tax-Environmental(2) 267,000 U 81 81 Utility Tax-Youth Teen Center(2) 429,080 U 129 129 Utility Tax-Street 1%(2) 1,451,449 U 429 429 Special Assessments 1,389,015 0 .Peal Estate Excise 569.144 A 674 674 Gambling and Leasehold Taxes 382,C00 0 Eusiness Licenses and Permits 979,286 A 1,159 1.159 3rants 576,443 0 State Shared Revenue(3) 2,848,958 P 834 1,256 14 2.114 Lccal Sales Tax Criminal Justice 814,280 P 577 577 Fire Insurance Premium Tax 94,CC0 0 Fire Protecticn District#37(4) 3,197,099 A (3,862) (2,862) Jail/Intergovernmental Revenue 973,990 0 ..King County Medical Semce Levy 657,938 0 F.-es and Forfeitures 1,035,286 P 734 734 1,648,779 0 arnd Charges 11,247,C60 0 Miscellaneous Fees(5) 606.769 O 667 667 !merest Income-General and Others 4,117,434 0 Water Utility 6.241,037 0 Sewer Utility 11,075,442 0 Crwnage UUlity(6) 4,649.707 O 821 821 3cd 3.048,122 0 Estimated Total Revenue 92,101,293 9,868 0 1,695 591 821 0 1,332 14,328 Ecoenditures: General Govemment 4,869,602 0 Pcuce 13,226,720 0 Fre 11,242.275 0 ?colic WerkslStreet 8.642.650 0 Leisure Services 6,462,932 0 Planning and Ccde Enforcement 3,138,354 0 Deot Service 2.657,156 0 niertund Charges 11,768,482 0 Water Utllity 5,478,488 0 Sewer Utility 11,173,000 0 Drainage Utility 2,470,411 0 GCIf 2,594,392 0 Estimated Total Expenditures 83.724,462 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Transter(In)Out 0 0 Fund Balance 0 Net Impact Income(Lass) 9.888 0 1,695 591 821 0 1,332 14,328 :NNEXMCC C9-Sep-96 04:08 PM r GREEN RIVER.NCTES FCR THE YEAR 1998-YEAR TWO 1)PROPERTY TAXES: Assaapd Valuation 5.525.574 5.625.574 Less Tax Exempt Properties 2.713.100 2.713.100 Less Senior Reduced Rate Property` 39.379 NIA Adjusted Assessed Valuation 2.573.095 - 2.912.474 Excess Levy Assessed Valuation :07 Average Per County Records Regular Levy: Adjusted Assessed Valuation Multiplied By The Regular Levy Rate Divided By 1000. 8.085 Regular Senior Reduced Levy: Senior Assessed Valuation Multiplied By The Senior Levy Rate Divided By 1000. 96 Voted Excess Levy Excess Levy Assessed Valuation Multiplied By Excess Levy Rate Divided By/C00. 1.122 Toml Pmpeny Tax 9.303 2)UTILTIY TAX: Estimated 3.50% 3.00% 0.2c% 1.01% Averace Billing General Envimnmentat Teen Street Total Dramaae 795 28 2 8 38 Eiec>tc:ty 22.770 797 68 228 1.093 Gamace 2.700 95 It B 27 211 Sewer NA 0 7eleoncne 11.250 394 34 1:3 540 'Nate, 5.400 189 16 54 259 42.915 1.5C2 81 129 429 Z.141 3)STATE SHARED REVENUE: Amount Criminal Per General Street Justice Total Perron Maoiie 7railer And Camoer Tax 12 12 0.29 Motor Venire Exc:.Tax 493 493 1 t.57 "—cuor Exctsc Tax tt6 1t6 2.75 Lcucr Profits Tax 224 224 5.31 _ccai Venice License Fee 349 349 6.25 Motor Vemcle Fuel Tax-Street 655 553 15.45 .'.:oicr Vehicle Fuel Tax-Arterial 305 3C5 7.22 C.^mmai Juspce Funding 14 14 0.33 546 1.307 14 C167 51.25 4)FiRE FRCTECTICN DISTRICT.737: Aciusted Annexation Assessed Valuation Divided By 1000. Multiciied By County Rate.Multiplied By Ninty Percent. 5).MISCE`LANECUS FEES: Budget Penning And Enameenng Misc.Fees 498.218 General Government Misc.Fees 108.551 606.769 Planning: Prcoosed Assessed Valuation Divided By Totat Assessed Valuation Multiplied By Budgeted Planning And Engineering Miscellaneous Revenues. 590 General Government: Proposed Population Divided By Total Population Multiplied By General Govemment Miscellaneous Revenues. 77 667 6)DRAINAGE UTILITY: Residential: Residential Units Multiplied By Basin•C'Monthly Charge Multiplied By Twelve. 821 Commercial Dramsge Charges 0 Tatat Oramage 521 1 ANNEXMCC 09-Sep-96 04:08 PM — I'I— •( I 67 -inj 1 � - 1 1� i _ - A �; — I -I 'I,-�. �' 3s nd zor � �s � —�'' � � a > 'N IG I „ m C V a I c c x < Io �al IF E—I —- m IN o e r a I e �� I 1Mi, r m'Z- W c p I E CD - Q w cc Q u� cJ II J p4 I I�• Lit rvLJ Colloo r;l � I (j���l .._ III"+._., � r`+ ' r'•J �`�l .' r i _ 0cI --� Zfcl N8 L �I Atl IL 6C� I CI iY OF ` 1J L1 CIT MAIL e City of Kent Property JAanage:nent 220 4th Avenue South Kent, Wa. 98032 Attn: aerjd McCauglian NOTICE OF INTENTION TO COMMENCE ANNEXATION PROCEEDINGS NAME OF PETITIONER: TO: TIME CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASI-IINGTON We, the undersigned property owners,believe our property constitutes not less than 10"a in value, according to the assessed Valuation for general taxation, of property contiguous to the City of Kent, and do hereby notify you of our intention to commence annexation proceedings seeking the annexation of the following described property to the City of Kent, by circulating a petition therefore among the property owners ofsnid areas. / The territory proposed In be annexed is within King Counly, Washington, and descri ed as follows. t� That portion of Section 25,Township 22 North, Range 4 East lying east of Burlington Northern Railroad and south of existing Kent City limits, AND that portion of Section 36,Township 22 North, Range 4 East, lying east of said railroad and north of existing Auburn City limits, together with all of South 277th Street that is public right-of-way lying east of said railroad right-of-way in said Section 25; AND ALSO, that portion of Section 31, Township 22 North, Range 5 East lying north of existing i Auburn City limits, EXCEPT that portion thereof lying within existing \ Kent Citv limits,AND ALSO Section 30, Township 22 North, Range 5 East except those portions lying within txis1mg Kent City limits. All in IGng County, Washington. P.BOVF OR ATTACITF-D DESCRIPTION NOT TO BE USED FOR LEGAL.OR ORDTIvIANCE PURPOSES WIIL•REFORE, these initiating parties respectfully request the honorable Council to set a date fora meeting with these initiating parties within 60 days Rom the elate of Filing this notice to determine whether thG'City of Kent will accept the proposed annexation. APPROVED AS TO FORM: Tom Brubaker, Assistant Cit� 220 41h AVE.SO., I KENT.WAS[]INGTON 96032 5095/ENGINE EnmG 1206M9 3300 1 OrMArIONS I206I059 31051 FAX 0 059.1114 /,/I Kent City Council Meeting Date September 17 , 1996 Category Bids 1. SUBJECT: KIWANIS TOT LOT NO. 4 - PHASE I 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Bids were solicited and received on September 10, 1996 for the Kiwanis Tot Lot #4 . The two bids received exceeded the engineer' s estimate. It is the Parks Department' s recommendation to reject both bids. 3 . EXHIBITS: Bid tab 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Staff and Parks Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ N/A SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember �k "Ci moves, Councilmember Z,L' seconds to reject both bids received on Kiwanis Tot Lot No. 4, Phase I. DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 5A .n o s o a o N r 0 0 o ,o m o � a) w cn U I CL a o t- { z m C d � V M y' N F W n O O O c O � C � O � M LL N O O O O O Q o rn M n ILL] Z O z ZLLI LL O = t Z P (n o 0 O Q Q O O O P W 3 O W Z r m W W O Q cl F Z LL CO `. � U w F a # Q o rn o z H e e W Y O o N o (n 0 0 0 z N e N u Y p m o n o o � o W o o o U O N 4 rn o u O coL. a � I W � m L Q O I W z o E a w W p o ¢ z m p m Q n CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS A. R E P O R T S A. COUNCIL PRESIDENT B. OPERATIONS COMMITTEE „ r C. PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE I G - D. PLANNING COMMITTEE E. PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE F. PARKS COMMITTEE G. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS ' < < l r<< ft lkf 3 , CITY OF KENT PARKS COMMITTEE MEETING SEPTEMBER 311996 Council Present: Chair Judy Woods; Connie Epperly, Jon Johnson Staff Present: John Hodgson; Lori Hogan, Barbara Ekstrom, Laurie Evezich, Helen Wickstrom, John Hillman, Roger Lubovich, May Miller, Pete Petersen. Teri Petrole-Stump Others Present: Wally Schorr, Riverbend Golf Course: Ed Ack, Riverbend Golf Course: Rod Saalfield, P.O. Box 887, Kent; Jim Stone, S.S.M.D.; Marcia McCrei6t, S.S.M.D.; S. Aldrich, S.S.M.D.; Harold Perantie, Golf Advisory Board; Doug Schwab; Rick Rasco, Golf Advisory Board, Brett Wilkinson, PGA; Dell Durden, S.S.M.D. Chair Judy Woods began the meeting by asking for any added items; no items were added. Accept Discovery Grant: Parks Committee authorized to accept and amend the 1996 budget for the $5,000.00 received from the State of Washington, Division of Developmental Disabilities to be used for specialized recreation programs. Connie Epperly moved to accept; Jon Johnson seconded. The vote was unanimous 3-0. Accept Pea Patch Grant: Parks Committee authorized to accept and amend the 1996 budget for the $19,595.00 received from Urban Resources Partnership for the community Pea Patch Program. The pea patch sites are at Railroad Park (LDS site) and Salt Air Hills. Jon Johnson moved to accept; Connie Epperly seconded. The vote was unanimous 3-0. Accept Work Training Grant: Parks Committee authorized to accept and change the 1996 budget for the $12,978.00 received from King County for the Summer Trails Program. Connie Epperly moved to accept; Jon Johnson seconded. The vote was unanimous 3-0. Appropriate Mobile Recreation/Computer Grant: Parks Committee authorized to amend the 1996 budget to allow for the expenditure of the $38,000.00 received from King County for the Mobile Recreation/Computer Program. Jon Johnson moved to accept; Connie Epperly seconded. The vote was unanimous 3-0. Amend King County Open Space Interlocal Agreement: The Parks Committee authorized the request for Mayor White to sign an amendment to the 1990 Conservation Futures Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between King County and the City of Kent to include the allocation of the 1994/95 Conservation Futures Funds and to accept and establish a budget for the $200,000.00. Connie Epperly moved to accept; Jon Johnson seconded. The vote was unanimous 3-0. Parks Committee Meeting September '), 1996 Page 2 Riverbend Management Study: The Golf Management Study prepared by John Hodgson was distributed. The city purchased the Par 3, driving range, and miniature golf course in 1981. In 1989 the 18-hole golf course was constructed. Since June of 1993, S.S.M.D. has been managing the golf course operation. In 1995 two major renovations were made: reconstruction of the miniature golf course, known as the Riverbend Putting Links, and renovation to the driving range. In June of 1996, the Parks Committee asked staff to put together a plan to proceed in evaluating the current golf course operation, and to offer some options for the future operation. The current contract with S.S.M.D. ends in December of 1997. The two objectives are: 1.) To provide the City Council with information needed to make a decision whether to contract out the management of the golf course, or return to city management. And, 2.) if the decision is made to contract the management, create an agreement allowing the city to recover its needed funds, (i.e. debt service, maintenance and operation, capital and reserve) and allow a contractor to be successful in the operation and receive a reasonable return for their investment. As evidenced by the timeline provided, this information is gathered from initial research. The only decision needed to be made at this time is to chose which options to research further. John referred to the matrix exhibiting information gathered from a questionnaire sent to 20 or more local cities managing golf courses. In summary, the matrix shows the majority of municipalities contract out the golf operations. In contracting out, the Pro is paid a percentage of the revenues. In most instances, the cities continue to provide the maintenance of their golf facility. Financial Information: May Miller reviewed the refinance of the 1988 revenue bonds used to build the 18-hole golf course. This was executed to reduce the interest rates, creating a savings of $909,543.00 and freeing up the bond reserves for capital improvements. The debt service was restructured so that only interest payments are paid in 1996 and 1997. If revenue projections are met, this makes 5285,000.00 in principal payments in each of these years for capital improvements. In addition to the mini putt and driving range improvements, other capital improvements are noted in this report. With projected revenue shortfalls in 1996, these improvements are deferred. In continuing the financial report, the graphs show revenues are down. The inclement weather impacted revenue for the winter and spring of 1996. The sale of food is down also. The 9-hole has remained steady. The driving range has dropped significantly in 1995, competition of three new driving ranges in south King County is a major factor. Driving Range fees have dropped due to the recent renovation of the range and local competition. It is holding lower than 1991 - 1994. Expenditures have remained consistent. Debt service will be met in 1996 and 1997, but in 1998 the principle payment is due; funding is short by $250,000.00. Other creative funding will need to be examined. The mini putt revenue went up slightly in 1995. Merchandise sales remain Parks Committee Meeting September 3, 1996 Page 3 consistent, except in 1993, which reflects a close-out sale year. Cart and club rental remain steady. Lesson fees were down slightly, also due to the range being closed for construction in 1995. Capital Improvements: The Golf Advisory Board developed a list of improvements (listed in report). Some items require substantial funding, while others can be accomplished in-house by the maintenance staff. The three items on the list that require further study are: ■ New clubhouse/pro shop at driving range and par 3 ■ Restaurant or banquet hall/renovation of shop area ■ Cover for miniature golf area and additional mini putt If a study were to be conducted, it should also determine the city's ability to pay debt service. or if these improvements should be done through the operational agreement with the contractor. John outlined the four management options: ■ Contractor golf operations: Currently taking place at Riverbend Golf Complex. Maintenance is provided by city staff. ■ City managed golf operations: City manages all facets of the golf complex, or certain segments are contracted out, i.e. merchandising, food, etc. ■ Private-non profit: Seattle operates under this system. The corporation hires the staff to manage the facility, all revenues pay for the operation of the golf course. ■ Franchise contracting: This is a unique method. All operations are franchised out. An example is: an outside pro shop manages the pro shop, an outside restaurant/company manages the food service operation. John asked for direction on proceeding with the evaluation of the four management options and how to proceed with the task force appointments. The private/non-profit option was dropped. It was agreed to create a task force to research the options and make a recommendation to the Parks Committee and Council. The task force will consist of two members of the Golf Advisory Board, one member each of the Men's Club, Ladies Club and Par 3, one from City Council or Parks Committee as ex-officio, 2-4 members of the community, Brent McFall, May Miller, and John Hodgson. Jim Stone asked to be included on the committee; it was approved. The goal set for the task force is to provide a recommendation either at the regularly scheduled Parks Committee meeting in November, or a special meeting in October. Parks Committee Meeting September 3, 1996 Page 4 Jim Stone commended John on his concise and unbiased report. Jim presented a financial performance report he felt was easy to understand, reflecting the bottom line. The report displayed revenue comparisons since the city contracted with S.S.M.D. 3.5 years ago. The summary showed revenue figures up from 1989 by S.74M. He stated that their performance is judged solely on revenue. To ensure success, Jim recommends: 1.) avoid fee increases 2.) review and analyze existing operating expenditures 3.) continue capital improvements; due to the need to stay competitive He added the expenses need to be reduced and we need to tighten our belts. Jon Johnson voiced concern that Jim's report lacked comparison of revenues, fees, and the number of rounds played. Jim replied the figures are available through the city's finance department. John Hodgson felt the task force might be apprehensive in their discussions regarding contracting, if the current contractor is on the task force. Jim Stone felt his input would be necessary and agreed to accept whatever decision is made by the task force. It was agreed that he would be in ex-officio capacity. Leona Orr commented that staff usually does not have voting power on committees such as this. It was agreed that city staff will also be ex-officio; the nine to ten citizens will be the only voting members. From the audience, Rick Rasco suggested a comparison be made of the pros and cons, not only of the current operation contract, but also of the present maintenance operation. John confirmed that research will include a comparison of contracting out maintenance vs in-house. He added to keep in mind that Riverbend is much larger than other courses in the area and to keep it relative. Judy Woods closed by confirming the task force will meet soon and will work quickly to make their recommendation, which will be presented at the Parks Committee meeting in November, or sooner, if possible. Meeting adjourned at 6:10 p.m. S N I-ti :--� U � � � O U � � � � � � � O H a � Q Q Q a - � w 1 V LJ 1�y r�1 Y� �l n r� I� VI U z O H � T U O � U z z z wx N wzQ > z W a a a o 00 Lr) W � W N N O ° o U a c� Q o O � a z w � V T �-, � Z Q � v O w w cry Q a � w v? rn Z V) w z Q Z ON ON Z w ' \ w � O w44 Q � T T N Q Q a � N CITY OF - i —�` Jim White, Mayor CITY COUNCIL, PLANNING COMMITTEE MINUTES July 16, 1996 Planning Committee Members Citv Attomev's Office Leona Orr, Chair Roger Lubovich Connie Epperly (standing in for Jon Johnson) Tom Brubaker Tim Clark, absent Planning Staff Jim Harris Margaret Porter Brian Swanbera Other Paul Mann (former City Council member) COMPARISON OF KENT'S .JUNK AND JUNK VEHICLE REGULATIONS WITH FEDERAL WAY AND WASHINGTON STATE (J. Harris) Planning Director Jim Harris explained that Federal Way had recently revised their zoning code in order to get a better handle on junk. Mr. Harris reviewed the pertinent code sections from Washington state, Kent and Federal Way. He states that Kent's code is more comprehensive referring to section 8.01 as an example of Kent's detail. Mr. Harris indicated that the state has the ability to remove an "abandoned junk vehicle" after 15 days whereas Kent processes violations through the Hearing Examiner with an unspecific timeframe. Assistant City Attorney Tom Brubaker stated that the Kent's code was in compliance with the state's statutes at the time the code was written. However, the State has since relaxed the standard for defining a "junk vehicle." The state also eliminated the requirement that a vehicle had to be without a valid, current registration plate in order to be considered a "junk vehicle." Code Enforcement Officer Brian Swanbera explained the current process for identifying and enforcing the City's code involving "junk vehicles." Swanbera stated that Kent's code does not include a definition for "inoperable" vehicles. He also identified a need to add additional verbiage to Kent's code to address issues involving commercial vehicles parked in residential areas, residential tractor trailer parked in yards, and how long an inoperable vehicle can be stored. Comparison of Kent's Junk and Junk Vehicle Regulations with Federal Way-and Washington State 2204th AVE SO /KEVT wASHINGTOV 94032-3599/TELEPHONE '%8t 9 "00/FAX 4 Xt O 1334 City Council Planning Committee Minutes July 16, 1996 Page 2 Mr. Paul Mann (former City Council member) encouraged the Committee to consider this issue and recommend an amendment to bring Kent's code in compliance with the state regulations, as well as, consider the language used in the Federal Way Ordinance. Mr. Mann also voiced his concern regarding the clarity for the penalty invoked. Chair Leona Orr questioned whether the City had the ability to actually confiscate these vehicles if a problem arises. Swanberg explained that there could be an issue regarding inadequate staff to comply with a shorter resolution. Mr. Harris questioned whether this issue should be brought before the City Council Safety Committee. Ms. Orr indicated that she would bring this item to their attention at the next safety meeting. Mr. Brubaker stated that under the State law the City has the right to impose the cost of reclaiming the vehicle or towing the vehicle and storing or destroying it against either the registered owner or the private property land owner that the vehicle was discovered or removed from. He explained that this is not always possible when the violator doesn't have the means to pay. Chair Leona Orr requested that the planning staff get the appropriate departments involved in this issue and put together a proposal. She asked for the proposal to include recommended changes to the code, any budgetary figures for any costs that would be incurred, and anv recommendation for additional staff to enforce the code changes. Harris pointed out that the subject would be brought back, at least for the begining of action, on the 20th of August. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 4:20 p.m. U:�DOCTCOM\MMI TESTC00716.MIN Comparison of Kent's Junk and Junk Vehicle Regulations with Federal Wa -and Washington State CITY OF Jim White, Mayor CITY COUNCIL PLANNING COMMITTEE MINUTES August 20, 1996 Planning Committee Members Present: Citv Attornev's Office Leona Orr, Chair Roger Lubovich Tim Clark Laurie Evezich Jon Johnson Tom Brubaker Planning Staff Other City Staff Jim Harris. Planning Director Brent McFall. Chief of Staff Fred Satterstrom. Planning Manage: Bill Wolinski, Public Works Matt Jackson, Planner Brian Swanberg, Code Enf. Carolyn Sundvall. Human Services Planner Margaret Porter, Administrative Assistant III Teresa Beener, Administrative Secretary Othe- Rodger Anderson. Seattle King County Association of Realtors PROPOSED KENT ".JUNK" ORDINANCE - (J. Harris) Planning Director Jim Harris noted that this issue was forwarded from the previous Planning Committee meeting. Code enforcement officer Brian Swanberg explained that the draft ordinance brought before the committee modifies the current code to comply with State statutes and to define "junk" vehicles. Kent City Attorney Roger Lubovich explained that when the original ordinance was developed Kent's code was within the State requirements; however, the State has since relaxed "junk" regulations. The State has eliminated the requirement that ajunk vehicle must be without a current registration to be classified as a "junk" vehicle. The State also required a "junk" vehicle to meet four additional conditions. The State has since relaxed that requirement; a"junk" vehicle now only needs to meet three of the four requirements. Mr. Lubovich again explained that the draft Ordinance presented would amend Kent's code to meet I he current State statutes. and clean up the language of said ordinance. Committee member Tim Clark questioned whether the requested amendments would make the code more difficult to enforce. 'Ylr. Swanberg explained that the changes would actually make it easier to classify "junk" vehicles and therefore make it easier to enforce. 201di4VP SO iRPV %SIII1(!70N1)N0,' 580i/ "0011'VC 98571334 City Council Planning Committee Minutes August 20, 1996 Page 2 Clark also questioned if there had been any difficulty in identifying the vehicle owners. Code Enforcement Officer Swanberg indicated that identifying an owner can be impossible; as in an example when a VIN# has been removed. Mr. Lubovich explained that the State regulations allow for a vehicle to be disposed of if the legal owner is unable to be identified (as in the instance of a removed VIN#, etc.). Chair Leona Orr requested a cost break down of the expense the City would incur to enforce the "junk" ordinance prior to the Committee's recommendation for final action. Planning Director Jim Harris questioned whether this item should be brought back to the next meeting and Chair Orr confirmed this item should be forwarded to the next Planning Committee meeting for action. 1997 - 1999 HOME INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT - (C. Sundvall) Human Services Planner Carolyn Sundvall explained that the current three year HOME Interlocal Cooperation Agreement (ICA) expires at the end of 1996. Ms. Sundvall explained that the only major change from the current agreement is the inclusion of the Federally funded McKinney Homeless Assistance Program. Previously the McKinney funds were allocated directly to agencies: this change would allow the funds to be allocated through the HOME Consortium. Staff recommended that the Planning Committee take the following action: 1. Recommend the approval of the 1997-1999 HOME Interlocal Cooperation Agreement. 2. Forward this item to the full City Council for consideration at the September 3, 1996 meeting, with a recommendation that the Mayor be authorized to sign the 1997-1999 HOME Interlocal Cooperation Agreement. Committee member Clark asked for clarification as to the length of the HOME Interlocal Cooperation Agreement. Sundvall explained that it is a three year agreement with an annual review for funds. Committee member Jon Johnson MOVED and Clark SECONDED a motion to approve the aforementioned two (2) actions. Motion carried. 1997 1999 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT - (C. Sundvall) Human Services Planner Carolyn Sundvall explained that the current CDBG Interlocal Cooperation Agreement expires at the end of 1996. Ms. Sundvall reviewed the two major changes in the new ICA, which were outlined in the staff report memo dated August 20, 1996. Staff recommended the Planning Committee take the following action: 1. Recommend approval of the 1997 - 1999 Community Development Block Grant Interlocal Cooperation Agreement. City Council Planning Committee Minutes August 20, 1996 Page 3 2. Forward this item to the full City Council for consideration at the September .3, 1996 meeting, with a recommendation that the Mayor be authorized to sign the 1997 - 1999 CDBG Interlocal Cooperative Agreement. Committee member Clark MOVED and Johnson SECONDED a motion to approve the aforementioned two (2) actions. Motion carved. DISCUSSION OF THE MANUFACTURING AND R&D TAX EXEMPTION - (L. Orr) Chair Leona Orr discussed the issue regarding taxes that the City of Kent and other cities lose as a direct result of the manufacturing and R&D tax exemptions given by the State. The State is in the process of looking at ways in which to modify the Growth Management Act and is requesting feedback from cities. At this time the Growth Management Act is set up for cities to accept annual Comprehensive Plan Amendments. Chair Orr suggested that the City consider suggesting an amendment to the Growth Management Act that would limit modifications to the Comprehensive Plan to once every two or three years. The City spends a great deal of resources processing Comprehensive Plan Amendments on an annual basis. Orr stated that she has personally received numerous complaints from concerned citizens regarding the unsettling issue that land use zoning designations could change from year to year. Planning Director Jim Harris suggested that this item be brought back to the next meeting for immediate action with a proposed recommendation from the City of Kent to the State for an amendment to the Growth Management Act allowing two or three years between Comprehensive Plan Amendments instead of the current annual amendment process. Chair Orr agreed to forward this item to the next meeting. The Committee continued to discuss related issues involving annual Comprehensive Plan Amendments with neighboring jurisdictions and potential annexation areas and the impact of both of these issues on Kent. The Committee questioned how the City can effectively plan for future growth when Kent has little or no control over the planning for the potential annexation areas. The Committee also discussed the specific issue regarding Kent's desire to preserve farmland in an area in south Kent. The farmland area directly south of the City limits currently in King County is being considered for commercial use. This land is in Kent's potential annexation area and would one day become a part of Kent. The committee discussed concerns regarding the County's consideration of amending the land use designations to allow industrial uses in an area historically preserved for agriculture. Committee member Tim Clark MOVED to recommend to the full council (at that evening's City Council meeting) to direct the Mayor to write a letter directly to King County that illustrates the concerns discussed by the Committee. These issues include the County's ability to make changes in zoning designations in potential annexation areas without regard to the Kent's future plans and a City Council Planning Committee Minutes August 20, 1996 Page 4 the process that lacks communication between neighboring jurisdictions. The motion was SECONDED by Committee member Jon Johnson. Motion carried. Added Item: 9ZCA-96-4 STREAM BUFFER REQUIREMENTS - (B. Wolinski/M. Jackson) The City is acting under a moratorium with regard to stream setback requirements within the Meridian Annexation area. The moratorium will expire on October 1, 1996. Assistant City Attorney Tom Brubaker explained that the Stream Buffer Ordinance must be approved by the second meeting in September. Otherwise, the Interim Stream Buffer Ordinance will need to be extended at that time. The Committee decided to bring this item back on September 3, 1996 for action. Committee member Clark requested that staff provide two separate map formats: i.e. one map illustrating the entire Soos Creek Basin and the other specific to the portions within the City limits. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 4:50 p.m. U:\DOC\PCOM\MINUTES\PCO08_O.MIN �? CITY OF 1_a� -� L BRENDA JACOBER (Please put in Council agenda packet) Jim White, Mayor CITY COUNCIL PLANNING COMMITTEE MINUTES September 3, 1996 Planning Committee Members Present: Citv Attornev's Office Leona Orr, Chair Tom Brubaker Tim Clark Laurie Evezich Jon Johnson Planning Staff Other Citv Staff Fred Satterstrom, Planning Manager Bill Wolinski. Public Works Matt Jackson, GIS Planner Lin Houston, Human Services Manager Carolyn Sundvall, Human Services Planner Margaret Porter. Administrative Assistant III Teresa Beener, Administrative Secretar-,- Other Rodger Anderson, Seattle King County Association of Realtors 1997 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM(CDBG) -(L.Houston) Human Services Planner Carolyn Sundvall informed the Committee the total proposed 1997 CDBG program is estimated at S576,263 and explained the relevant contingency plans. This is a thirty-two percent(32%) increase (S139,713) from our 1996 CDBG funding level of S436,550. There are three portions to this program. The Capital funding portion is S436.586, the Planning & Administration funding portion is S65,428, and the Public (human) Services funding portion is S74,249. Staff recommended that the Planning Committee take the following action: 1. Approve the proposed 1997 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program. including its contingency plan, and forward for adoption to the full City Council. 2. Schedule a public hearing for September 17, 1996, for the full City Council to consider adoption of the proposed 1997 CDBG Program. Committee member Tim Clark confirmed the CDBG is Federal money that is allocated locally. He also questioned whether the capital funds allocated to the Mental Health Housing Foundation for the Buccheit Gardens Acquisition was a county-%wide project. Planner Carolyn Sundvall explained that the City of Kent funding is a small portion in comparison and other cities have proposed funding for this project. I '`p lih A%F,]I)_ /KIiNI-,A%'AS]IING-ION "MI; III[I.19'I IOV I. i'06IXiO-1100/FAX=xSQ-I1{4 l i:y —ounce:. Planning ......i_..cs September '), 1996 Page 2 Clark asked for further clarification relating to the YWCA of Seattle-King County Domestic Violence Housing. Human Services Manager Lin Houston explained that the funds proposed would cover the rent of five units for one year and some support services. Committee member Tim Clark MOVED and Committee member Jon Johnson SECONDED the motion to accept staff recommendations. The motion carried. 9ZCA-96-4 STREAM BUFFER REQUIREMENTS - (M. Jackson) Planner Matt Jackson presented the Committee with maps showing the entire Soos Creek Basin Planning Area and the City of Kent Soos Creek Basin Overlay. He explained that the Ordinance would govern potential annexation areas covered by the drainage basin once the areas were annexed into the City. Assistant City Attorney Tom Brubaker discussed some language changes recommended by the Public Works Department. The changes are as follows: 1. Page 1 - language amended to indicate the three major creeks and their unnamed tributaries. 2. Page 11 (Definitions) - Add language to the "small livestock' definition to further clarify the livestock densities, six (6) small livestock will be equivalent to one large livestock. 3. Page 19 - In regard to manure storage areas add the language "6} Manure shall not be piled within any stream buffer." Brubaker explained that these changes do not go beyond what exists in the current King County Stream Buffer Ordinance. Committee member Tim Clark clarified that this Ordinance would continue the protection that King County had in place. Brubaker confirmed that Kent's Ordinance would incorporate the same or slightly less restrictive buffer requirements that were in place in King Countv. Committee member Jon Johnson MOVED to send the Stream Buffer Ordinance with amended changes discussed today to the full City Council on the September 17th for adoption. The motion was SECONDED by Committee member Tim Clark. The motion carried. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 4:25 p.m. U:\DOC\PCOM\MINUTES\PC00903.'YI IN M