Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
City Council Meeting - Council - Agenda - 01/18/1994
City of Kent City Council Meeting � CITY O Mayor Jim White Council Members Judy Woods, President Jim Bennett Paul Mann Christi Mouser Tim Clark Jon Johnson January 18, 1994 Office of the City Clerk CITY OF "LMS MAYOR: Jim Jim Bennett Paul Mann SUMMARY AGENDA KENT CITY COUNCIL MEETING January 18, 1994 Council Chambers 7:00 p.m. White COUNCILMEMBERS: Christi Houser Tim Clark Judy Woods, President Jon Johnson CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL 1. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS A. Proclamation - Kent Jaycee Week Q 2. PUBLIC HEARINGS erg A. Cable TV Rate Regulation - Ordinance - B. S. 231st Street (Landing Way) Street Vacation STV -94-1 C. Chestnut Ridge Zoning AZ -93-1 3. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Approval of Minutes B. Approval of Bills C. Carpinito Business Park Rezone - Set Meeting Date ---- CDj Chestnut Ridge Comprehensive Plan Map Designation - -KEuvi.0�� E. LID 344 - Traffic Signal at 108th & 240th - Ordinance -,315a F. Everson Annexation - Ordinance -3153 G. Segregation Request - LID 320 - Resolution-434-P,/3q1 H. Sales of Surplus Vehicles I. Mill Creek Canyon Erosion - Acceptance J. North 4th Avenue Street Rebuild - Acceptance K. 1993 Asphalt Overlays - Acceptance L. Reiten Road Landslide Repair - Acceptance M. Family Homes Short Plat - Bill of Sale N. Stone Pine East Sewer Extension - Bill of Sale O. Robinson Sewer Extension - Bill of Sale P. Conservation Futures Grants Q. Cedar Meadows Final Plat FSU -90-4 - Set Meeting Date 4. OTHER BUSINESS A. LID 343 - Street Improvements on 111th Sidewalks) - Resolution to Create and B. Transit Advisory Board Appointment C. Planning Commission Appointments 1. CCComnss deration of Candidates for Vacant 5. BIDSPexs°"' A. Signal at Reiten Road and Jason Avenue 6. CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS 7. REPORTS Avenue SE (Sequoia Set Hearing Date -4af3 3(3%1- Council Seat An EXECUTIVE SESSION may be called to evaluate the qualifi- cations for the vacant council seat. 8. ADJOURNMENT NOTE: A copy of the full agenda packet is available for perusal in the City Clerk's Office and the Kent Library. An explanation of the agenda format is given on the back of this page. Any person requiring a disability accommodation should contact the City in advance for more information. For TDD relay service call 1-800-635-9993 or the City of Kent (206) 854-6587. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Citizens wishing to address the Council will, at this time, make known the subject of interest, so all may be properly heard. A) Proclamation - Kent Jaycee Week Kent City Council Meeting Date January 18. 1994 Category Public Hearings 1. SUBJECT: CABLE TV BASIC SERVICE RATE REGULATION 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: This hearing has been set to discuss a proposed ordinance that will give the City limited rate regulation authority over a basic service tier of cable television programming, including related equipment, instal- lation and service charges. The City's regulatory authority is authorized by recent amendments to the Federal laws, rules and regulations governing the cable television industry. 3. EXHIBITS: Ordinance 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended MR EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: SOURCE OF FUNDS: L OPEN HEARING: PUBLIC INPUT• CLOSE HEARING: 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember T" moves, Councilmember r �`� seconds to adopt Ordinance No._J_5 relating to cable TV basic service rate regulation. DISCUSSION: Council Agenda Item No. 2A RECEIVED OCT 41993 CITY ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON CITIES September 21, 1993 TO: Mayors, City Managers, City Clerks FROM: Stan Finkelstein, Executive Director RE: Cable television rate regulation 1076 S. Franklin St. Olympia, WA 98501 (206) 7534137 Enclosed for your information and use are additional information regarding the process for cable television rate regulation, as recently authorized by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Please use these items in conjunction with the packet of information we mailed on August 17. This packet contains, once again, the FCC form (#328) that franchising authorities need to file with the FCC in order to become certified to regulate local basic cable rates. It also contains a summary of the rate regulation process and a sample ordinance. The Association wishes to acknowledge the generosity of two firms that granted reproduction rights for the enclosed items: Arnold & Porter, 1200 New Hampshire Avenue, NW, Washington, D.C. 20036, (202) 872-3990; and Miller & Holbrooke, 1225 Nineteenth Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20036, (202) 785-0600. For more information about cable regulation issues, please call Curt Pavola, AWC Program Coordinator, at (206) 753-4137. Also, the National Association of Telecommunications Officers and Advisors, an NLC affiliate organization, is available to help answer your questions, at 1301 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, D.C. 20004; (206) 626-3160 or FAX (202) 626-3043. SSF/CP enclosures Cooperation for Better Communities _.- ... mss.. ., ...v. •c•^ . .;� >r:.,.. : . .: 11 .V It .I. :. .1 • .II:. .1: a• .•: n ✓.�I• :�.• • . :...I• • . •r•L Stj:.j t6, M Iti . ..: •.' .111 :M la \ :.1 : -! . • . �. • .I.v • • 0 Local franchising authority reviews rates subrrrittect by cable operator Cabie fates go RTto effect Local f mrhsrng may Local traT�lfSlrlg ��'_""/ „~) in 30 days. deer"the effective date of deter M the eff8dm date of rates for 90 days. rates for 150 days W-41,10 . : 1q:1 II .•.- . , :/. ww. a I:. 3 I :.S . :•. US, . V. II . �". . 1 . 01 IG .:.rt •: • rt • n :rt♦ � ; .err • • • • • •.-a • �!NMVIIII to.. r ::v . t•. RATE REGULATION BASIC QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS FOR MUNICIPAL OFFICIALS By Nicholas P. Miller and Joseph Van Eaton Why Are Rates An Issue For Me? Congress changed the law so that rates for cable television service can be regulated in most communities. The Federal Communlca- tions Commission ('FCC') implemented the law by adopting regulations that should re- duce average subscriber rates. However, rates are not reduced automatically. Con- sumers will not enjoy all the benefits of regu- lation unless cities take certain FCC -mandated steps. What Rates Are Regulated? All service and equipment rates can be regu- lated, except rates for premium services and pay-per-view services. Thus, rates can be regulated for basic service, other programming service packages (often called 'expanded basic' or'super basic"tiers'), remote controls, converters, additional outlets and installation. Who Regulates Rates? The franchising authority — usually the City or County government — is responsible for regu- lating rates for basic service and equipment (basic service is the lowest priced tier offered by the operator; basic equipment is any equip- ment used to receive basic service, such as remotes, converters, and additional outlets). The FCC regulates rates for 'expanded' ser- vice tiers and expanded tier equipment. RATE REGULATION PAGE 1 Almost all 'expanded' equipment is also •basic' equipment, so most equipment rates will be regulated by the franchising authority, not the FCC. How Does Rate Regulation Begin? asic Rates. Before rate regulation can begin: 1. The franchising authority must be certified to regulate basic rates. A franchising author- ity becomes certified by filing a simple, one- page FCC certification request form with the FCC. On the form, among other things, the community must pledge to regulate rates consistent with FCC rules. Certification will be automatic in most cases; a community's certi i - cation Is effective 30 days after the form is filed unless the FCC denies certification. In addition, no later than 120 days after certlfica- tion is effective, the franchising authority must adopt rules It will follow when regulating rates (these rules can be adopted even before the certification form is filed). These rules can be quite simple. Once the rules aro adopted, and certification is effective, the franchising authori- ty notifies the operator. The date that notice is given, basic rate regulation begins, and the operator Is required to make a filing justifying its rates. 2. Alternatively the franchising authority may petition the FCC to regulate for ft. The fran- chising authority must prove that ft is incapa- ble of regulating rates. Once the petition is granted, the FCC will assume the community's rate regulation responsibilities. The petition process is not simple: a franchising author - fly may be required to show that, even if it devoted all franchise fees to the task, It could not regulate rates. Expanded tiers. Expanded tier regulation begins when a subscriber or franchising au- thority files a complaint at the FCC. The complaint must be filed on a simple FCC form. If the complaint Is properly filed, the operator RATE REGULATON PAGE 2 must submit a filing to the FCC justifying As expanded tier rates. How will rate regulation work? The FCC adopted a relatively simple general method for setting rates initially and reviewing future Increases; a process for establishing rates' when the general process does not work; and a transition mechanism Intended to prevent operators from harming consumers while regulations are being put Into place. General rules for existing rates. The FCC decided there should be 10% average reduc- tion In subscriber bills. It also decided opera- tors could only charge cost plus a reasonable profit for equipment. To Implement these basic principles, the FCC is requiring opera- tors to compare their existing rates to an FCC benchmark per channel rate. An operator Identifies the applicable benchmark by using a table much like a tax table. Each operator's benchmark varies depending on the number of subscribers and channels on a system. 1. If the comparison shows an operator's existing per channel rate is below the FCC benchmark, there is no reduction in rates. An operator whose rates are below the bench- mark at the time regulation begins cannot raise rates up to the benchmark, since, according to the FCC, it freely chose to charge the below -benchmark rate while deregulated. About 20% of all systems fall Into this category. 2. Han operator's rate is atthe benchmark, Its rates do not change. 3. H an operator's per -channel rate is above the benchmark, It must reduce that rate, but no more than 10% from Its September 30, 1992 per -channel rate, adjusted for inflation. General rules for future rates. After regulated rates are initially established, operators will be allowed to Increase rates annually to cover Inflation and quarterly for increases In'extemal costs' that exceed inflation. 'Extemal costs' are costs supposedly beyond the operator's control, such as programming costs and costs associated with satisfying franchise require- ments. The cost of rebuilding a system is not now an 'extemal cost,' but the FCC is conducting a rulemaking to decide if the cost of franchise -required upgrades should be passed through to consumers as an 'external cost.' Comments are due Sept. 30. Exceptions to general rule. In order to protect operators, the FCC authorized operators to initiate 'cost of service' proceedings If the operator believes the benchmark results in unfairly low rates. However, consumers and local officials cannot Initiate cost of service proceedings if they believe the benchmark results In unfairly high rates. To protect small systems, the FCC stayed the rate rules alto- gether, pending Issuance of further orders. Transition mechanisms. To allow time to prepare for rate regulation, the FCC adopted a rate freeze which will remain in place until November 15. The freeze prohibits operators from increasing the average subscriber bill. Operators can restructure tiers and change rates so long as the average subscriber bill remains the same. Operators are repricing during the freeze so that, in some communities, most subscribers are seeing rate increases — $244.00 per month — while a minority sees decreases. Operators may be required to lower these rates once rate regulation begins. What if rates are too high? Basic rates. If the operator's rate Is above the benchmark, and it can't justify a higher rate based upon its cost of service, a franchising authority can set the correct rate, and order refunds so long as it issues FCC -required -HATE REGULATION PAGE 3 orders preserving refund rights. The first time rates are set, refunds can be ordered for overcharges back 12 months, or to September 1, 1993, whichever is less. For example, If a community begins regulating basic rates for the first time in March, 1994, and Issues a final rate order In April, 1994, it can still order refunds for overcharges back to September 1, 1993. For future basic rate increases, refunds can be ordered back 12 months, or to the date of the order issued by the franchising authority allowing a rate to go Into effect subject to refund, whichever is less. Expanded bask:. The FCC can set the correct rate and order appropriate refunds. Refunds can be ordered back to the date a complaint was filed If (a) for existing rates, the complaint was filed by February 28, 1994; or (b) for future expanded tier rate increases, the com- plaint was filed within 45 days after the in- crease showed up on subscriber bilis. Is there any harm in delaying regula- tion? Yes. First, the benchmark rates increase every month for inflation. Delaying regulation means an operator can justify higher rates. Second, once the rate freeze ends, operators can raise rates to any level and charge those rates until a new rate is set. If an operator that Is charging a below -benchmark rate raises its rates, the franchising authority cannot use the FCC's benchmark system to force that opera- tor to reduce its rates back to the below - benchmark levels. Thus, delaying regulation may Increase rates to subscribers in some communities. Third, for expanded basic, refunds go back only to the date a complaint is filed; for basic rates, refunds are generally available for only one year. Delay can mean lost refunds. However, federal law does not require a com- munity to regulate. A city could decide that ft will not regulate for now and begin regulating basic rates later. It could waft for a future expanded tier rate increase and file a com- plaint about ft. A decision delaying regulation can limit subscriber refunds and result in higher rates than would otherwise apply, but does not prevent a city from regulating forever. Can delay result in lower rates? Yes, but not often. Each quarter an operator can Increase regulated rates to cover increases in *external costs' incurred after the date regulation begins or February 28, 1994, whichever Is earlier, to the extent those increases exceed Inflation. If a community Is about to impose significant new obligations that would be 'external costs' (as might occur at renewal or if customer service standards that exceed FCC standards are adopted), it may choose to delay regulation temporarily to avoid a rate increase. A city in such a situa- tion should carefully consider If waiting actually benefits subscribers, considering possible losses from delay. My operator says it will agree to keep rates lower It I don't regulate. The FCC has stated such agreements are unenforceable. A community that agrees to delay regulation may end up with no benefits and higher rates. Absent a new FCC ruling allowing rate contracts to be enforced, a city enters into an agreement at its own risk. I want to regulate as soon as possi- ble. When do 1 need to act? Assuming your city can regulate, Expanded Basic complaints can be filed beginning Sep- tember 1. To maximize potential subscriber refunds, and avoid weekend dates, Basic Regulation should be implemented as follows: RATE REGULAT10N PAGE 4 Certification forms should be filed with the FCC between September 1 and October 13; regulations should be adopted and effective no later than November 12; notice that certification is complete and regulations adopted should be given to the operator no later than November 12. Is this process the same process use to Improve customer service? No. The FCC separately set customer ser- vice standards for office hours, answering tele- phones, complaint response, billing and subscriber notices. it is generally up to the franchising authority to enforce the FCC stan- dards. Before enforcing the standards, the franchising authority must give the operator 90 days advance notice of its enforcement plans by certified letter. This notice is separate from any rate notices. Note: a franchising authority can enforce FCC customer service standards, plus standards it unilaterally sets by ordinance or regulation plus franchise standards. i i I ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the C ty of Kent, Washington, to pr( for the regulation of basic s7qLpment, ce tier rates and related installation and servicarges of any cable televis on system operating in the City/ of Kent. WHEREAS, on OctoYhe 1992, Congress enacted the Cable Television Consumer Protecd Competition Act of 1992 (the "1992 Act") which, among things, provided that the basic service tier rates, andcharges for related equipment, installation and services, as those terms are defined in the 1992 Act, of a cable televis on system (hereinafter, "Basic Service Rates and Charges") sha be subject to regulation by a franchising authority in accordanc with regulations prescribed by the Federal Communications Commi Sion (hereinafter the "FCC"); and WHEREAS, /on April 1, 1993, the FCC prescribed such regulations in the Report and Order In the Matter of Implementation oJ Sections of Cable Television Consumer Protection and Com etition Act of 1992: Rate Regulation? MM Docket 92-266, FCC 93-177 (released May 2, 1993) (hereinafter the "FCC Rate Regulations")t and WHiEREAS, the City of Kent (hereinafter, the "city") is a franchising//authority with the legal authority to adopt, and the personnel to administer, regulations with respect to the Basic Service Rotes and Charges of any cable television system operating in the c1Jty, including, without limitation, the system currently being operated by TCI Cablevision of Washington, Inc. (hereinafter 1 "the Franchisee") pursuant to city Ordinance No. 3107 (KCC Chapter 7.12) and No. 3108 (hereinafter, collectively, the "Franchise"); and WHEREAS, the city desires to regulate the Basic Service Rates and Charges of the Company and any other cable television system operating in the city and shall do so in accordance with the FCC Rate Regulations, notwithstanding any different or inconsistent provisions in the Franchise; NOW, THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Recitals Incorporated. The foregoing recitals are incorporated by this reference and are fully made a part hereof. 7 Section 2. ection 7.12.240 of the Kent City Code (contained in Section 2 of dinance No. 3107) is hereby amended as follows: Section 7.12.240. Rate's. A. Subject to federal, state and local law, the city may establish and regulate the rates or charges for providing cable service and establish rate regulation procedures. In the event that federal laws are subsequently enacted that would allow the city to review, regulate and establish the rate charged to a subscriber { for cable services, the city may thereafter take such action. I 2 .0 0 in the Franchise. 1, In 2. n C, v/dthin thirty (30) days after the grant of any franchise hereunder, a franchisee shall file with the city a complete schedule of all rates to be charged to subscribers. Prior to implementation of any change in rates or charges for any service or equipment provided by a franchisee, a franchisee shall provide to the city and all subscribers a minimum of thirty (30) days' written notice of the new schedule of rates to be charged. Sect�3— Savings. Kent City Code Section 7.12.240 (enacted in section 2 of ordinance No. 3107), which is amended by this ordinance, shall remain in full force and effect until the effective date of this ordinance. 3 'sions of this 1 T e prove Sect 4, Severability• The. ordinance are declared to be separate and severable'section sentence, parag ph, subdivision, invalidity of any clause, application or portion of this ordinance, or the env lidity of the thereof to any person or circumsta ces shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this ord' ance, or the validity of its application to other persons or cir umstances. Sect 5• ETLec�-. effect and be in force thirty approval and passage as prov� ATTEST: BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: ate. This ordinance shall take �o) days from the time of its final d by law. ROGER A. LUBOVICH, CITY ATTORNEY PASSED the day of APPROVED the day of PUBLISHED the day of 4 JIM WHITE, MAYOR 19-- _ 19 19_• Kent City Council Meeting Date January 18, 1994 Category Public Hearings 1. SUBJECT: S. 231st STREET (LANDING WAY) STREET VACATION STV -94-1 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: This public hearing is to consider an application by Birtcher VDL Land Partnership to vacate Landing Way from 64th Avenue South to South 228th Street as referenced in Resolution No. 1374, and as shown on the accompanying map and discussed in the staff report.. 3. EXHIBITS: Staff report, map and application 4. 5. N. RECOMMENDED BY: Planning Director (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: OPEN HEARING: PUBLIC INPUT CLOSE HEARING: 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember -" t seconds to approve/disapprove/mod-i€y-the Planning Department's recommendation of approval with conditions of an application to vacate Landing Way from 64th Avenue South to South 228th Street as referenced in Resolution No. 1374, and to direct the City Attorney to prepare the necessary ordinance upon receipt of compensation. DISCUSSION: rt44w11.3.P Council Agenda Item No. 2B CITY OF ZQ�I0ZS 3 llF,p®I[CC`�A MEMO TO: FROM: CITY OF KENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT (206) 859-3390 MEMORANDUM January 7, 1994 MAYOR JIM WHITE AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS JAMES P. HARRIS, PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON AN APPLICATION TO VACATE S. 231ST STREET (LANDING WAY S.) - #STV -94-1 I. Name of Applicant Birtcher VDL Land Partnership 22613 68th Avenue South Kent, WA 98032 II. Reason for Requesting Vacation The applicant states that, "Birtcher VDL Land Partnership is seeking to vacate Landing Way from 64th Avenue South to South 228th Street to accommodate large distribution uses as shown in Exhibit B attached. Vacation of Landing Way will provide Van Doren's Landing with the opportunity to compete for large distribution uses which cannot be accommodated on any other area of the industrial park." III. Staff Recommendation After reviewing comments from agencies: . Public Works • Fire Police Washington Natural Gas METRO US West Communications Parks the following departments and and conducting our own review, the Planning Department recommends that the request to vacate a portion of S. 231st Street (Landing Way S as mentioned in Resolution 1374 and shown on the accompanying map, be APPROVED with conditions. Landing Way South is a new street which was built by the developer of Van Doren's Landing and dedicated to the City in U Report and Recommendation on an application to vacate S. 231st Street (Landing Way S.) - #STV -94-1 January 7, 1994 Page 2 conjunction with the approval of the abutting plat. Because of this, the City has neither spent any funds on its acquisition nor as of this date, on its maintenance. Under Ordinance 2333, the Landing Way right-of-way is considered a class C street and the City, at its discretion, can ask for compensation if it is vacated. Additionally, as a street to serve a plat, Landing Way South provides vehicular and utility access to the properties that front on the street, some of which, were this vacation approved without due consideration, would be developmentally landlocked. PROPOSED CONDITIONS 1. The City be compensated for the value of the property. In accordance with Ordinance 2333 the value would be 1/2 the appraised full value for which compensation could be in cash or real property of at least equivalent value. 2. The lot configuration within the plat shall be modified and/or adjusted such that the remaining lots shall not be landlocked with respect to access and utilities. Said lot reconfiguration and/or adjustment shall be subject to review and approval of both the Public Works and Planning Departments. 3. The City shall retain that portion of the street right- of-way lying easterly of the westerly property lines of Tract "B" and Tract "A" as if said lines were projected southerly and northerly respectively through the street right-of-way. 4. The City shall retain utility easements for the City's utility facilities (sewer, water and drainage) within Landing Way South until the applicant provides engineering drawings and performs the necessary work which would enable said utilities to be deleted from the City's system. 5. The applicant shall either delete, if appropriate, or reconstruct the Landing Way entrance on S. 228th Street and 64th Avenue to conform with City construction standards for private driveways. Said actual deletion and/or reconstruction shall be determined by the City at the time of issuance of a development permit on the abutting property. JPH/mp:c:stv.941 71 A > 73 50 73 O > Zoo O P C� QJr EXHIBIT A Ll LU Y OF I/Ef4T C f TY. CJ Q) > 73 50 > Zoo Ll LU Y OF I/Ef4T C f TY. CJ TKACT TKACT "All ---------------- ------------------------ PROPOSED STREET VACATION S. 231st STREET (LANDING WAY SOUTH) RESOLUTION #1374 Q) > TKACT TKACT "All ---------------- ------------------------ PROPOSED STREET VACATION S. 231st STREET (LANDING WAY SOUTH) RESOLUTION #1374 �0. McC�i]lian • Ilamc; B richer VDL Land partnershio OF KENT -22613 68th Avenue South j So. 4th AVC. Address: Kent, I4A 90032 Kent, Washington 90032 Phone: (206) 395-3400 ( D NOV 1 L'' 1993 STREET ANO/01( ALLEY VACATION APPLICATION_ANO PI:TITI011 CITY 1QFL TO Dear Mayor and Kent Cfty Council_ L South 231st StreeC (ca rnnly ret rea !" CITY CLFRK ------------ way South) Flc, the undcrsildne(�abhLLing properly u mets, hereby respectfully request that certain hereby be vacated. (General Location) a Lcgal. Ocscri1)LIof, g 6t�eE�,L, .r•w'n�6'^.�CfG'i�tY1e " 111M 2Ps thl t�nzz'�� Jh; " 8h , Ile )z7^ O BRIEF SIATCHENI WHY VACATION 1S BEIIIG SOUCIIi -ae fCCm 64th A�Cnue Sirtcher VDL Land Par'cnershin i=_ seeking to vaca!:e_-•----` South to South 228th Street Co c l eetare wgill�oscvideticr van Dcr^n's Landas n.n.gnwi " `t'e 0 attached. vacation of --�s 8 attached. to car,pete for large distributrion uses which cannot ce accnT atK on any other area of the industrial nark. Sufficient proof, copy of decd conLracL etc. suppol'-ed by i',inC County Tax Rolls shall be submitted for verification of s;9natures. WiLhout these a "CURRENT" Litlr report shall be required. ldhen Corporat;Ons, Partnerships etc. arc being signed for, Lhcn prcof Of ;ncliviclual's authority to sign for same shall also be subr.iitLcd. Attach a color coded map of a scale of not less than 1" = 200' of the area sought for vacation. (110TE) Flap uulsL correspond with legal de5c1-i9L1on. Gr!i ABUTTIIIG PROPERTY 04111ER5 L01, L'LOCI: :' I'Lnl/SCC. f`dll. i!G SIGNATURES ALIO ADDRESSES L3irtcher, VDL r..anc1 Partnership, 22G13 68Lh Avenue South Kent, Washington 98032 14, '[WP. 22 N., R. 4 y.., R [brti.on of the N.G. 1/4 and the S.C. 1/4 of Section Lot One, Tax No. 887980-0200 — 897980-0210 Block Three ___—------- -�— Lot Two, Tax No. Tax No. 887980-0220 _ Lot Three. Lot Four, Tax No. _ 887980-0230 . No. Tract n, Tax 887980-0290 r, fllc]- Lot one, Tax 'To. 887980-0240 — 887980-0250 LOC TWD, Tax No. Tax No. 887980-0260 _ Lot Threa. Four, Tax No. 087980-0270 0 87 9 80 -0280 Lot Five, Tax No. "rax _ 007900-0300 Tract 0. No. Ie 5160.00 Fec Pall .? Ir I: :,:Ur,i t'•`. --' _(R......- Land Value 1'ald— Ceed Accepted --.--- — Kent City Council Meeting Date January 18 1994 Category Public Hearings 1. SUBJECT: CHESTNUT RIDGE ANNEXATION PROPOSED INITIAL ZONING (AZ -93-1) 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: This is the second of two required hearings for the proposed initial zoning of the Chestnut Ridge Annexation area. The first hearing was held on December 71 1993. The Planning Commission recommends approval of the zoning designation outlined in Alternative #1- 3. EXHIBITS: Memo dated 12-7-93, staff report of 10-25-93, Planning Commission minutes of 10-25-93 and 11-08-93 4. RECOMMENDED BY: -Planning Commission (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: r OPEN HEARING: PUBLIC INPUT: CLOSE HEARING: 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds to �pprodei'sz�F�Fr°'f�3' the Planning Commission's recom- mendation of approval of the Chestnut Ridge Annexation Area initial zoning designation as outlined in Alternative #17 DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 2C CITY Of IIT oFrti¢oa CITY OF KENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT (206) 859-3390 MEMORANDUM December 7, 1993 MEMO TO: MAYOR DAN KELLEHER AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: JAMES P. HARRIS, PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: CHESTNUT RIDGE ANNEXATION ZONING - PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION I am pleased to forward the Planning Commission recommended zoning for the Chestnut Ridge annexation area. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on proposed zoning on October 25, 1993, and made their recommendation after deliberations at their November 8, 1993 meeting. The Planning Commission's recommended zoning is attached herewith and is labeled Alternative '#1. (Alternative #1 was one of three alternatives evaluated in the staff report to the Commission.) As you can see, the entire annexation area is recommended for single- family residential zoning. Most of the area is recommended for Ri- 7.2 zoning. The proposed zoning pattern is consistent with the Planning Commission's recommendation on the Comprehensive Plan map amendment. By City ordinance, the City Council must hold two public hearings on the recommended zoning. The first hearing is scheduled for December 7, 1993, and the second hearing is scheduled for January 18, 1994. Planning Department staff as well as a representative from the Planning Commission will be available at the December 7th hearing to further explain the recommended zoning for the Chestnut Ridge annexation area. FSN/JPH/mp:chestnut.pc Attachment cc: Ed Heineman, Planning Commissioner Fred N. Satterstrom, Planning Manager Y �h Chi 4.S � v Gia 1 AN\EXATION AREA 4iommm2mm ZONING BOUNDARY arra r RESIDENTIAL AGR!CUL. RA ? UNIT PER ACRE SINGLE FAv!1LY RES!DENTIA'_ I — I . UN':T PER ; ,200 LY RzESID:---NTiA- RI9.6 ? UNIT PER 9,000 SO.� . PT-�T'� GIT I LI'A; '� � 1 AN\EXATION AREA 4iommm2mm ZONING BOUNDARY arra r CITY Of CITY OF KENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT (206) 859-3390 MEMORANDUM October 25, 1993 MEMO TO: ED HEINEMAN, CHAIR, AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: KEVIN O'NEILL, SENIOR PLANNER SUBJECT: PROPOSED CHESTNUT RIDGE ANNEXATION AREA INITIAL ZONING mAZ-93-1 Backaround In April 1993, the City Council approved the annexation of the area known as the Chestnut Ridge Annexation.Area into the City of Kent. This area, which is approximately 187 acres, is generally bounded by S. 200th Street to the north, S. 208th Street to the south, 92nd Avenue S. to the west, and 100th Avenue S. to the east (see attached maps). Subsequent to the annexation of the area by the City, the entire area was zoned R1-20 (Single -Family Residential), pursuant to Section 15.03.020(E)(2) of the Kent Zoning Code. The purpose of this process is to establish initial zoning for the annexation area, as outlined in Section 15.09.055 of the Zoning Code. This report will outline background information on the area, including the previous zoning of the area while it was still located in unincorporated King County. The report will summarize some of the differences between the previous King County zoning designations and City of Kent zoning, and then outline three alternatives for zoning the area which have been considered by both staff and residents of the area. This project is being done concurrent with a comprehensive plan map amendment, which will incorporate the annexation area into the City's Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map. The report for this project ("rCPA-93-2) outlines much of the background and history of this area. This report will summarize this information in order to help understand the rationale behind the zoning alternatives and recommendations. Further background information on the annexation area can be found in the Chestnut Ridge Annexation Area Initial Comprehensive Plan Map Designation (77rCPA-93-2) report. 1 Memo To: Ed Heineman, Chair, and Members of the Planning Commission Re: Chestnut Ridge Annexation mAZ-93-1 Existing Land Uses The land uses in this area are predominantly single-family residential, with the exception of the Springbrook Elementary School, which is located at the northeast portion of the annexation area on 100th Avenue S. A large portion of the annexation area has already been subdivided and built upon, particularly the area between S. 202nd and s. 208th Streets. There are also a fair amount of single-family development between S. 200th and S. 202nd Streets; however, the lot sizes tend to be much larger in this area, with many having the potential to be further subdivided in the future. There are some large vacant parcels located at the southwest corner of the annexation area. The zoning alternative maps show both existing parcels and buildings in the area. Environmental Constraints As stated, much of the annexation area is already developed, and environmental constraints are somewhat minimal throughout most of the area. However, there are significant environmental constraints on the southwestern portion of the area. Slopes in parts of this area exceed 25 percent, particularly on the large vacant parcel at the southwestern corner of the area. Much of this parcel is identified as a ravine on the City's Hazard Area Development Limitations Map. The Hazard Area Map also identifies Low and High Hazard Areas just to the north of this parcel, reflecting the topography of this portion of the annexation area. The north fork of Garrison Creek also intersects the southern portion of the area. The Hazard Area Map identifies Garrison Creek as a major creek. These designations will have a significant impact on the level of development which can take place on these parcels under the City's existing Water Quality and Hazard Area Development regulations (Section 15.08.224 of the Zoning Code). These regulations restrict the level of development on and adjacent to hazard areas such as creeks and steep slope areas. Therefore, these designations must be a major consideration in developing zoning recommendations for these parcels. Previous King Countv Zoning Prior to being annexed into the City of Kent, this area had been recently rezoned as a result of the soos Creek Community Plan, which was adopted by the King County Council in 1991. The previous zoning designations are shown on the attached map (see Previous 2 Memo To: Ed Heineman, Chair, and Members of the Planning Commission Re: Chestnut Ridge Annexation #AZ -93-1 King County Zoning Map). Prior to the Soos Creek Plan, the entire annexation area was zoned S -R 9600. In preparing the zoning alternatives and recommendation for the annexation area, staff attempted to be as consistent as possible with the previous King County zoning, since the zoning had been done so recently, and had been based on a very long and extensive planning process in the overall Soos Creek Community Planning Area. However, as the next section points out, there are some significant differences between King County and Kent zoning regulations. These differences have a significant impact on keeping the initial zoning of the area in Kent consistent with the previous County zoning. Comparison of King County and Kent Zoning As shown on the Previous King County Zoning Map (attached), King County zoning designations for the Chestnut Ridge annexation area were residential, including GR -5-P (RS 5000), RS 7200-P, SR 9600-P; and RS 5000-P. Required minimum lot sizes within the County residential zones are similar to the 5000, 7200, and 9600 square foot lot sizes in the City of Kent Zoning Code. There are differences, however, between Kent and King County residential zoning regulations regarding certain uses and development types and standards. The following is a summary of the major differences: 1. The letter P added to the single family zoning designations shown on the Previous King County Zoning Map refers to County regulations requiring street trees, tree retention, specific street and pedestrian circulation design, and recreation space. At this time, the City of Kent has no residential street tree requirement for development, but compliance with street standards, compliance with pedestrian circulation standards, and retention of significant trees are required. Recreation space requirements are set forth in the City of Kent Subdivision code. 2. The County zoning designation GR (Growth Reserve) is shown near the north and south boundaries of the Chestnut Ridge annexation area. The intended purposes of the GR designation are to prevent urban development before provision of adequate services and facilities, to reserve large tracts of land for future growth, to protect environmentally sensitive areas, and to promote efficient land use patterns. The GR -5 zoning also established potential zoning of RS -50001 to go into effect as of January 1, 1995. Until then, the minimum required lot size is five acres with exceptions which included provision for higher densities in multiple lot subdivisions and short subdivisions. The GR designation provided for lot clustering 9 Memo To: Ed Heineman, Chair, and Members of the _. Planning Commission Re: Chestnut Ridge Annexation rrAZ-93-1 with "reserved tract" provisions for open space and possible future subdivision. The Kent Zoning growth Code vedoes not provideor foe cluster development or development. 3. The King County RS (Single Family Residential) designation allowed similar uses to those allowed under the R1 zoning designation shown on the City of Kent alternatives maps. However, King County zoning allows more uses because of the diverse nature of properties found in the County. The major differences between King County RS and Kent R P tinned designations Unit are in regard to townhouse dwellings, Developments, mobile homes, accessory dwellings in r typeesces of and accessory dwellings in buildings. The above yp development are allowed under King County Zoning Code regulation, but are not allowed within the City of Kent R1 zoning designation. Zero Lot Line development is allowed in R1 zones in the City of Kent, but is not allowed under County' zoning regulation. 4. The previous SR classification, located north of SE 208th Street, was intended to provide for urbanization of areas which are presently suburban in character. It provided for large lot size (9600 square feet minimum), which was intended to accommodate present agricultural use and future urban development. It also limited townhouse construction to approved PUDs (Planned Unit Developments). The City of Kent Zoning Alternative 1 proposes a minimum 91600 square foot lot sizes; however, the City has not adopted a policy regarding later development of lots. In addition, the Kent Zoning Code does not provide for PUD development in residential zones. Under the County SR classification, agricultural developments such as small commercial fishing ponds, small animal farms, and animal clinics were allowed outright, while agricultural ative l would uses allowed under the City of Kent Zoning Altern be limited to crop and tree farming and the keeping of animals other than household pets on lots larger than 20,000 square feet. Zoning Alternatives and Analysis After reviewing the history and background of the area and conducting field visits, staff generated three alter at velzoning ning designations for the area. on September 8, 1993, Department conducted an open house at the Springbrook Elementary School to solicit public comment on these zoning alternatives, as well as comment on comprehensive plan alternatives which were 4 Memo To: Ed Heineman, Chair, and Members of the Planning Commission Re: Chestnut Ridge Annexation #AZ -93-1 developed in conjunction with the zoning alternatives. Many residents of the area attended the open house, and completed a questionnaire, which offered the residents an opportunity to express their preferences regarding the zoning alternatives, and also express concerns about other neighborhood issues. A report which summarizes the results of the questionnaire is attached as Exhibit A. The three zoning alternatives are described below. It should be noted that all three alternatives propose to zone the majority of the built -out area between S. 202nd and S. 208th Street to R1-7.2 (Single -Family Residential). The primary reasons for this proposed designation is that most of this area is already developed, and this zoning designation is consistent with the previous King County zoning designation of'RS-7200. The rationale for this will be further discussed in the section of the report outlining the staff recommendation. Alternative 1 This alternative would apply the R1-7.2 (Single Family Residential) zoning designation to the entire area between S. 200th and S. 208th Streets, with the exception of the parcels located at the northeast corner of S. 208th Street and 92nd Avenue S., which would be zoned R1-9.6 (Single -Family Residential). The large parcel at the extreme southwestern portion of the annexation area would be zoned RA (Residential Agricultural). Under this alternative, the R1-7.2 and R1-9.6 zoning designations between S. 202nd and S. 208th Streets are consistent with the previous King County zoning. The R1-9.6 zoning of the parcels at the northeastern corner of S. 208th and 92nd Avenue S. reflects the steep slopes in this area, which seems to justify a lower density zoning than the surrounding R1-7.2 zoning. The area between S. 200th and S. 202nd Streets is proposed to be R1-7.2, since the overall potential development characteristics of this area seem to be substantially similar to the area to the south of S. 202nd Street. This.zoning would be lower density in the long term than the previous County zoning designation of GR -5 (RS -5000). Finally, the RA zoning is recommended in this alternative for the parcel south of S. 208th Street due to the severe environmental constraints of this site, since the RA zone is the lowest density single-family zoning district in the current zoning code, restricting development to 1 dwelling unit per acre. In the long term, this is substantially less density than would be allowed under the previous GR -5 (RS -5000) County zoning for the site. 0 Memo To: Ed Heineman, Chair, and Members of the Planning Commission Re: Chestnut Ridge Annexation ,#AZ -93-1 Alternative 2 This alternative is similar to Alternative 11 with two exceptions: the parcels at the northeast corner of S. 208th and 92nd Avenue S. would be zoned R1-7.2 instead of R1-9.6; and the large parcel south of 208th Street would be zoned R1-12 (Single Family Residential) instead of RA. The rationale for this alternative is similar to the rationale for Alternative 1. The major difference is that this alternative would allow slightly higher densities on the two areas identified above. This alternative proposes that the parcels directly to the north of S. 208th Street be zoned the same (R1-7.2) as the rest of the area between S. 200th and S. 208th Streets, since there are some other parcels within that area which also have steep slopes. The parcel to the south of S. 208th Street would still have a low density zoning designation (approximately 3 units per acre), but would allow more development capacity than Alternative 1. Alternative 3 This alternative is distinct from the first two alternatives regarding the zoning of three major portions of the annexation area: the area between S. 200th and S. 202nd Streets; the parcels at the northeast corner of S. 208th and 92nd Avenue S.; and the large parcel to the south of S. 208th Street. The proposed zoning of the area to the north of S. 202nd Street would be R1-5.0 (Single Family Residential), which is the highest density single family zoning district under the City's existing zoning regulations. The parcels to the north and south of S. 208th Street would be zoned MRD (Duplex Multifamily Residential). This zoning district permits both single-family residential development and duplexes. The rationale for zoning the area north of S. 202nd Street R1-5.0 is that this most closely approximates the previous King County zoning of GR -5 (RS -5000) in this area. The MRD zoning along S. 208th Street is proposed due to the environmentally nature of these parcels. A Planning Unit Develop(PUD) PUD) , which offers more design flexibility, is not permitted under City of Kent zoning regulations in single-family zoning districts, whereas PUDs are allowed in multifamily districts such as MRD. Therefore, the proposed zoning of MRD would allow a PUD on these sites, which may be the most feasible way for these sites to be developed due to steep slopes. The MRD zoning on the large parcel to the south of S. 208th Street also is fairly consistent with the previous County zoning of GR -5 (RS-5000)--RS-5000 zoning would allow 8 units per R Memo To: Ed Heineman, Chair, and Members of the Planning Commission Re: Chestnut Ridge Annexation JAZ -93-1 acre, while the MRD zoning district allows approximately 10 units per acre. Staff Analvsis Alternative #1 places zoning on the majority of the area which is consistent with the previous County zoning of RS -7200 for the area between S. 202nd and S. 208th Streets. It is recommended that the area to the north of S. 202nd Street also be zoned R1-7.21 since there does not appear to be any compelling reason to treat this area differently than the area to the south. The recommended R1-9.6 and RA zoning designation reflect the environmentally constrained nature of these sites, particularly the large parcel south of S. 208th Street. The R1-9.6 zoning is also consistent with the previous County zoning designation. While a PUD may very well be the most appropriate way to develop these sites, the development density that the MRD zone allows (io units per acre) is not appropriate for these sites. It should also be noted that many citizens in the area requested that the zoning throughout the annexation area be lower density than R1-7.2, either R1-9.6 or preserving the interim zoning of R1-20. However, many of the parcels which are already platted and developed throughout the area are less than 9,600 square feet. Therefore, any zoning designation of density less than R1-7.2 would create many nonconforming parcels. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council the zoning designation outlined in Alternative 1 for the Chestnut Ridge Annexation Area. 1<o/ch:az931.rpt Enclosures cc: James P. Harris, Planning Director Fred Satterstrom, Planning Manager Matthews Jackson, Planner 7 CHESTNUT RIDGE PREVIOS U KING COUNTY ZONING GROWTH RESERVE xCR-5 1 UNIT PER 5 ACRES EXzlRES 12/.31/94 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL RS -5000 1 UNIT PER 5,000 Sa.r . SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL RS -7200 1 UNIT PER 7,200 SOFT. SINGLE FAamILY RESIDENTIAL SR -9600 1 UNIT PER 9,600 Su--FT- ,%W, \x, G_FT. ,% ,\x, CITY LIMITS ANNEXATION AREA ZONING ECUNDARY ` `� �+� \ �• � sJ I - . �jyy 'Y ^ r� D"A r PER ACRE SINGLE FAv1ILY RESIDENTiA �+� \ �• � sJ I - . �jyy 'Y ^ C--� . I L;i�ll ANNEXATION AREA 4Em==E=w* ZONING 80UNDAR'f RESIDENTIAL AGRICC __ R"• RA RA 1 UNIT PER ACRE SINGLE FAv1ILY RESIDENTiA RI -7.2 1 UNIT PER 7,200 S0. I. S IN" E rAM ;LY RESIHNTIP R I -9.6 , UNIT PER 0,00o 50-71. C--� . I L;i�ll ANNEXATION AREA 4Em==E=w* ZONING 80UNDAR'f vow A Lelx U 7k: 7v��n TM QQQP�Z;�Mt� 2--'- ,,&� 4 g g R&ydl S ItE V, r, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIN - RI -7-2 1 PE UN17 .. LR 7,200 SO -71- _S';,NGL:-" FA-�AIILY RE&DEN-liAL 12 -i'UNiT PER 12,000 SC'.F1. C-plz�. �. CITY LIMITS ANNEX'10,NAREP L—j ® ZONING BOUNDARY WIN OF ��± N 5 L v.(01, �v-1 ritr G' N SST. Q c ;JO 5 Q fl p 4i E7 oG Q p 0 4 Q QC G 0 RI -5.0 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIA.'_ 1 UN(T PER 5,000 SQ.F . RI \ 1 —7.2 SINGLE FAMILY R-SfDFN'W , UNiT PER 7,200 SQ-Fl- Q.F .DUPLEX M, R DUPLEXMULTIFAMILY r^\ 7,200 SQ.�•MIN. SING'_E S,.,QO SQ.FT. MIN. DUPLEX CITY LIMITS -( ANNEXATION AREA ® ZONING BOUNDARY G'TYCrr .rljyyyTfr � E EXHIBIT A CHESTNUT RIDGE ANNEXATION ZONING REPORT ON THE RESULTS OF CITIZEN QUESTIONNAIRE On September 8, 1993, the Kent Planning Department hosted an Open House on potential zoning in the Chestnut Ridge annexation area. The meeting was held at Springbrook Elementary School at 20035 100th Avenue South. Approximately 60-70 persons attended the Open House. Attendees at the Open House were encouraged to respond to a questionnaire regarding land use planning issues and zoning alternatives for the Chestnut Ridge annexation area. To help attendees understand the proposed zoning alternatives, maps and graphics were displayed and City staff were available to answer questions. A total of 56 questionnaires were returned. The following is a report of the final survey results with a commentary by Kent Planning Department staff on the implications of the response: a+a+++ora+aa+aaaa+•a aaaar a+a+++++aaaaa+a araraa ♦++++aa++aaa++a++++ 1 . Are you a resident of the Chestnut Ridge annexation area? Yes 55 No 1 Comment: With the exception of one person, all respondents to the survey were residents of the Chestnut Ridge annexation area. Landowners adjacent to Chestnut Ridge were notified of the meeting but did not elect to turn out in any significant number. 2. Do you own or rent a home in the Chestnut Ridge area? Own 53 Rent - Other 2 Comment: The vast majority of respondents were homeowners. This is consistent with the high overall homeownership rate of the annexation area. Although respondents were not asked the type of residence they owned, it is safe to say assume that most homeowners, if not all, resided in single family homes. 3. If you currently live in the Chestnut Ridge area, how long have you resided here? Less than one year 4 1 - 5 years 20 More than 5 years 31 Comment: The majority of respondents have lived in the annexation area for more than five years. However, a significant number of respondents have lived in the Chestnut Ridge area for a period of less than five years. This may be related to the fact that the housing in much of the annexation area is relatively new. 4, What do you like most about your neighborhood? (Check only your top two reasons.) Schools 11 Views 20 Open Space 1s Rural atmosphere 23 Quality of housing 12 Proximity to employment 13 Other 3 Comment: Respondents seem to favor the low density, rural character of the Chestnut Ridge area. Together with the relatively high number of responses to Views (20) and Open Space (18), the top three response categories all relate to the openness and rural character of an area which has expansive views out over the Kent Valley below. Other factors, like schools and proximity to work, did not rank as significant reasons for why respondents liked their neighborhood. In terms of the "Other" responses, the quietness and locational convenience of the Chestnut Ridge area received favorable mention. 5. Prior to annexation to Kent, were zoning and land use policy matters of concern to you? Yes 49 No 4 No opinion 1 Comment: As the numbers indicate, respondents have had concerns about zoning and land use issues prior to annexation to Kent. 6. If you answered "Yes" to question #6, above, what concerns did you have about King County zoning and land use policy? Comment: This question was a follow-up to question #5, above, dealing with concerns about King County land use policy. Since this was an open question, it was difficult to tally or categorize responses. Nevertheless, respondents seemed to have some common issues or problems with County land use policy prior to annexation. The main issue was the protection of single family neighborhoods. Not only did respondents indicate their support for low density, single family residential use, but also their opposition to any form of multiple family development. Congestion of roads and the increasing traffic in the neighborhood were also common themes. Protection of the natural environment and adherence to environmental regulations were also of concern to respondents. 7, What environmental issues are the most important to you? (Please rank in order of importance, beginning with "1" as the most important.): Traffic mitigation 25 Noise 3 Open Space 9 Tree preservation 2 View protection 3 Steep slope protection 7 Water qualitylstorm water runoff 5 Other (Please specify): Comment: The vast majority of respondents are concerned about traffic mitigation in their neighborhood. Nearly one-half (25) of the respondents indicated traffic was their most important environmental issue. All other issues were relatively less significant in comparison, with the possible exception of Open Space which ranked as the number one issue with nine (9) respondents. Environmental issues such as noise, tree preservation, and view protection were not ranked first by a significant number of respondents. 8. King County zoning allows "clustering" of development in single family residential zones; Kent's zoning rules do not. If Kent changed its policy to permit clustering in single family zones, what issues would you consider to be important in the review process of such proposed developments? Buffering of adjacent uses 21 Access of proposed development 17 Size and density of proposed development 34 Environmental protection 21 Character of neighborhood 26 Other (Please specify): 3 Comment: The majority of persons indicated that they were concerned about the size and density of clustered residential developments (34 responses). In effect, this concern is very much related to the second, Character of Neighborhood, which received 26 responses. The summary of responses, above, does not show that several respondents indicated they were opposed to clustering altogether and did not check any of the listed concerns. It should be noted that the sum of responses exceeds the number of completed questionnaires. Some respondents indicated multiple concerns, and all were tallied. ZONING ALTERNATIVES 9. Which zoning alternative do you prefer? Alternative 1 43 Alternative 2 6 Alternative 3 1 Other 5 Comment: The overwhelming majority of respondents favored Alternative 1, as evidenced by the numbers above (43 responses, or 78%). Alternative 1 is the lowest density alternative, overall. Alternative 3, which proposed duplex type zoning for portions of the annexation area, received only one response. Five (5) respondents favored zoning alternatives different from any which were outlined in the questionnaire. All of these responses indicated a preference for even lower density residential zoning than proposed in Alternative 1 . a:survey.cr KENT PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES October 25, 1993 The meeting of the Kent Planning Commission was called to order by Acting Chair Heineman at 7:00 pm on October 25, 1993 in the Kent City Hall, Chambers West. PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS PRESENT: Edward Heineman, Jr., Acting Chair Gwen Dahle Kenneth Dozier Albert Haylor Robert MacIssac Janette Nuss Raymond Ward PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBER ABSENT: Christopher Grant Kent Morrill, excused PLANNING STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: James P. Harris, Planning Director Fred Satterstrom, Planning Manager Matt Jackson, Planner Kevin O'Neill, Planner Laura Evezich, Assistant City Attorney Ed White, Traffic Engineer Chris Holden, Recording Secretary APPROVAL OF SEPTEMBER 27, 1993 MINUTES MOTION MADE and SECONDED to accept the September 27, 1993 minutes as presented. MOTION CARRIED. NOTICE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS Mr. Harris informed the Commissioners that a Capital Facilities Plan meeting is sheduled to held on November 30, 1993 from 5-9 PM. #CPA -93-2 CHESTNUT RIDGE An amendment to add a newly annexed area of Kent to the City's Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Map. The area is bounded by S. 200th Street on the north, 100th Avenue S. on the east, S. 208th Street on the south and 92nd Avenue S. on the west. City staff is recommending that the area be designated as SF 6, Single Family, 1 Planning Commission Minutes October 25, 1993 north of 208th Street and SF 1, Single Family, south of 208th Street. Matt Jackson, Planning, showed the newly annexed on the view foil. The area was annexed on April 61' 1993 by ordinance 20 3000 s care 099. The interim zoning for the area is R1-20, Single Family, , q feet minimum lot size. The area is mainly single family residences with one school, Springbrook Elementary. Most of the lot sizes can be put into two groups: 8 to 10,000 square feet and 1 to ik acres. However, there are some under- developed parcels in the area as well as significant environmental constraints. Some slopes in the area range between 3 and 4 percent and others exceed 25 percent. Slopes which are above 15 percent can have significant hazard area development restrictions. Mr. Jackson pointed out on the view foil the location of the significant slopes areas. The Chestnut Ridge area was under the King County Soos Creek Plan with designations of single family. The King County designation for the area was Urban and the Soos Creek Plan designated the areas as single family with a density of four to eight units per acre. This area was also under the King County Phase 1 designation. Mr. Jackson commented that the majority of surrounding land use in the area has been designated as single family. In addition, there is a golf driving range being constructed in the area. Mr. Jackson remarked that the Single Family Designated Area Overlay should be amended to include this annexation area. There are two alternatives recommended. Alternative 1 is SF 61 Single Family Residential, 4 to 6 units per acre north of S. 208th Stret ne unit theelargedparcel betweenFamily S. 208RthsSttreetaandoS. 212th er acre Street. for SF 1, Single Street. Alternative 2 designates the portion between S. 208th Street and S. 212th Street and a portion north of S. 208th Street, extending 650 feet east of 92nd Avenue S., and north 850 feet, as MF 12, Multifamily Residential, 7 to 12 units per acre. The remaining area should be designated SF 6. Mr. Jackson commented the justification behind the SF 1 designation is because of the significant slopes in the area as well as the fact that Garrison Creek is in the area. About 29 acres are located within this designation. Chair Heineman asked if the public would like to comment. 2 Planning Commission Minutes October 25, 1993 Ron Harmon, 20627 95th Avenue S., commented that in the area designated as SF 1, there are very steep slopes. In addition there are also wetlands in the area. Gale Harmon, 10627 95th Avenue S., spoke about the development of the valley over the years. She felt it was very important to keep green belt areas. There are several animals and birds located in this area. She favors having zoning of R1-9.6 or one unit per acre. Ms. Harmon pointed out on the view foil where she resides. She lives on three-quarters of an acre overlooking the valley. Bill Scribner, 20424 92nd Avenue S., commented there are water problems in the area. He commented he's lived here for twenty years. He resides below the Chestnut Ridge area. He stated there has always been some water seepage in the area but since the hill has been developed, there have been serious water problems. King County put in a drain down the hill to help the water problem, but the water problem became worse. In the past 20 years, two areas have slid off the hill. One landslide block 92nd Avenue S. for three days. Mr. Scribner pointed out where he resides on the view foil. He felt that more development would create more problems. Mr. Scribner pointed out on the view foil where some bulldozing had been done. Since that time, the water flooding problem has become even worse. Mr. Scribner was in favor on Alternative 1. He submitted some three pictures to the record. Randal Thomson, 9406 S. 205th Place, pointed out his residence on the view foil. Mr. Thomson commented that since the Chestnut area was developed, there have been two instances of flooding under his house. Last year he redid his drainage system because of water flooding his garage. Mr. Thomson remarked about water problems in the areas. He felt there shouldn't be anv building allowed on the hillside because of the steepness of the slopes. Mr. Thomson talked about exiting the area and the difficulty in getting onto 212th. He mentioned the 208th and 212th intersection is actually a three-way intersection and if there's an accident, which seems to be about once a week, then all the traffic gets backed up. The soil in the area is mainly clay. Edward Schemeta, 9405 S. 205th Place, lives across the street from Mr. Thomson. He showed his residence on the view foil. Mr. Schemeta commented the area has been developing and changing since 1977 when he moved into his residence. He was very pleased about being informed by the City of what is happening as well as being able to participate in the hearings and meetings regarding the area. Mr. Schemeta talked about the development of high density creating traffic problems. If any development is allowed 3 Planning Commission Minutes October 25, 1993 on the hillside, traffic will become really terrible. He didn't see how anyone could safely enter or exit that area. Mr. Schemeta remarked that 208th would have to be expanded to be a four -lane road with a left -turn lane. He mentioned Saar Cemetary and the loss of a historical site. He is in favor of Alternative 1 but would really prefer to have the entire area be zoned SF 1. Jonn Kastien, 20609 94th Avenue S., pointed out location of residence on the view foil. Mr. Kastien commented they live on the edge of the ridge and the slopes are quite steep. He recommends that someone should come out and look at the area. Mr. Kastien felt that SF 1, minimally, should extend up through the valley. In the staff report on page 2, paragraph 2, there is a comment about no wetlands are on the site. Mr. Kastien, however, had a letter from the King County Conservation District stating there were two wetlands on the site. Mr. Kastien submitted the letter to the record. Norma Kastien, 20609 94th Avenue S., would like the SF 1 designation extended further and would like to see Alternative 1 approved. Ms. Kastien commented that there are several residences located along the ridge. She stated the soil consists mainly of Alderwocd soil which is very erodible. She commented she has a view from her lot. However, she wasn't concerned about the view. Ms. Kastien was more concerned about the impact of major development causing a disturbance to the soils and slopes which would create problems. Their property is about a quarter of an acre in size. Mr. Harmon commented that the requests to extend the SF 1 designation would be where the MF 12 designation is being shown on Alternative 2. Howard Woodward, 9623 S. 203rd Street, pointed out location of property on the view foil. Mr. Woodward is also representing the Chestnut Ridge Homeowners Association. He pointed out on the view foil the slopes in the area. He mentioned another development in the King County area that the driveways are very long and v -sloped inward to catch the water because the slopes are very severe. The Homeowners Association. prefers the area be designated as shown under Alternative 1. Mr. Woodward expressed concerns about the traffic and water problems especially if further development takes place. Joel Ross, 1662 Dahlia Lane, Tumwater, WA, representing the property owner of the 29 -acre parcel bounded by 208th and 212th Street. He pointed out the property on the view foil. Mr. Ross 4 Planning Commission Minutes October 25, 1993 commented that because of the extreme slopes of the hillside and other sensitive areas on the site, the site's best developable use would be to construct cluster housing instead of the single-family housing. He mentioned that his presentation is focused on the zoning portion because there is no appropriate zoning available to develop the property in a low-density manner. He would like to read into the record a letter he prepared stating the reasons for the cluster housing zoning. Mr. Ross commented the property owners do not desire either Comprehensive Plan designation which would be more fully understood after hearing the letter. At this point, Mr. Harris succinctly stated that this testimony should be heard under the zoning portion of the hearing and not the Comprehensive Plan portion. Mr. Ross retired until time for public testimony on zoning. Andrew Fuller, 20628 95th Avenue S., pointed out the location of his residence. Mr. Fuller commented that any increase in development over the larger single-family housing developments would be unfortunate. Kent already has a large proportion of multifamily housing and there would have to be a very compelling reason why more multifamily housing would be constructed in Kent. Mr. Fuller felt the potential sliding of the hillside if there was development, and the increase in traffic congestion should determine that higher density is unacceptable. He understood that cluster housing is a large number of dwellings are constructed in one area and then more common yard area is provided. This would make sense if the steep slopes or other sensitive areas were left undisturbed. He was in favor of Alternative ,5`1. Anne MacTavish, 20437 94th Avenue S, pointed out where she resides. Ms. MacTavish is in favor of Planning staff's recommendation for a Comprehensive plan alternative 1, although her preference would be for a lessor density. This is mainly because of the steep slopes in the area. Ms. MacTavish commented that when the Chestnut Ridge development was constructed, their residence started having flocding problems. They had.tc put in a new drainage system that would carry the water from their front yard to the back yard. Ms. MacTavish pointed out the steep slopes in the area. She felt any further activity in this area could possibly cause landslides. The size of the lots in the their area range from one-half acre to an acre. Bruce MacTavish, 20437 94th Avenue S., Kent, WA 98031, is in favor of Alternative Yi. He felt that the SF 1 area should also be extended to include the steep hillsides. He had two concerns; one G Planning Commission Minutes October 25, 1993 was the steepness of the slopes and the other was the limited access to 208th. Elaine Fleming, 20541 92nd Avenue S., pointed out the location of their property, across 92nd from the Chestnut Ridge development, and they are also affected by water run-off in the area as well as is traffic is qud. In uite heavy there.! d She Avenue S. q wanted the leastopossible straight d density placed on the property. Mr. Ross elucidated the reasoning why the property owners he was representing didn't support either alternative recommended by staff. This site wouldn't support a development of potentially 203 to 348 residential units. The flat benches on the property would support the development 60 to 80 of townhouses, triplexes and fourplexes. This clustered housing type of development would not impinge on the sensitive areas located on the property. The public hearing was closed. A brief discussion followed concerning the surrounding zoning and the property size around the annexation area. Mr. Jackson commented that the east side of the annexed area is in King County and the exact zoning is unknown. He showed on the view foil the lots that were less one acre. The City would like to avoid, however, any situation of creating lots which would be nonconforming. Mr. Jackson stated there is some smaller lot development taking place in the surrounding area. There was discussion about the feasibility of deciding the im. It Comprehensive Plan designation on the propert o t Would tbeeheard was decided that the recommended zoning p r first and then questions from the Commissioners would be heard and discussion of the feasibility of both plans would be discussed and a recommendation made. #AZ -93-1 CHESTNUT RIDGE ANNEXATiUN [ tSrnP, 1LlyI is general) bounded This area, which is approximate) 187 acres, is generally he south, 92nd by S. 200th Street to the north S. 208th Street to t Avenue S. to the west, and 100th Avenue S. to the east (the attached maps). Subsequent to the annexation of the area by City, the entire area was zoned R1220(Sin le -Family Kent Residential), pursuant to section 15.03.020(E)(2) o ng Code. The purpose of this process is to establish initial zoning for the annexation area, as outlined in Section 15.09.055 of the Zoning Code. 0 Planning Commission Minutes October 25, 1993 The public hearing for AZ -93-1 is opened. Kevin O'Neill, Planning Department, focused on the alternative zoning recommendations and the rationale behind the recommendations. Mr. O'Neill explained the Planning Department has several areas in the City and nearby listed on a Hazardous Area Map and even though this area was not in the City at the time the map was done, the area is shown on this map. Several hazardous areas are depicted. Development would be restricted on those parcels due to restrictive regulations. Mr. O'Neill commented that environmental constraints are considered when property is being developed. Mr. O'Neill commented the Kent Zoning Code does not currently allow clustered development. He commented the previous King County zoning on the site is RS -7200, one lot per 71200 square feet. Another area was designated as RS -9600, one lot per 9,600 square feet, which would be a density of four units per acre. Another area was zoned Growth Reserve, which is a holding zone, one lot per five (5) acres until the end of 1994, at which time the lots would revert to RS -5000. Mr. O'Neill explained that in single family zoned areas, King County allows two types of development: Planned Unit Developments and "cluster development". King County in determining the density of Cluster development would look at the gross density of the parcel. For example, if the site was twelve acre size and zoned RS -9600 zoning, under a Cluster development, approximately 48 units could be developed on the site. However, clustering means not every lot would have to be 91600 sauare feet. It would be possible to make some of the lots smaller as long as the overall density wasn't exceeded. The Chestnut Ridge area is somewhat of a cluster development because when it was platted, the King County zoning designation was RS -9600 but some of the lot sizes in that area are less than 9,600 sauare feet. The Kent Zoning Code does not allow either of those two types of development to occur. Mr. O'Neill commented that 9,600 sauare feet equates to approximately one-quarter of an acre. There are three zoning alternatives recommended by staff and the community. However, the Planning Commission can recommend any of the three or a combination of the three or whatever it determines. Alternative 1 would recommend RA, Residential Agricultural, zoning for the area south of 208th, which is one unit per acre. This would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation of SF 1. For one area to the north, the recommendation is R1-9.6 which would be comparable with King County zoning cf RS -9600. For the remaining properties, the recommendation is for R1-7.2, Single Family Residential (minimum lot size of 7,200 sauare feet). 7 Planning Commission Minutes October 25, 1993 Alternative 2 recommends R1-12, Single Family Residential, minimum lot size of 12,000 square feet which would allow about three units per acre for the area south of 208th. For the area north of 208th, the area is recommended to be zoned R1-7.2, Single Family Residential. Alternative 3 is very comparable to the Comprehensive Plan Alternative 2. There are three recommended zoning designations: MRD, Duplex Multifamily Residential, for the area south of 208th as well as a portion to the north; R1-7.2, Single Family Residential for the area south of 202nd; and R1-5.0, Single Family Residential (minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet) for the area to the north of 202nd. 'Staff is recommending Alternative 1. This would be consistent with previous staff recommendations of Comprehensive Plan, Alternative 1. The rationale behind this recommendation is that the land is heavily environmentally constrained with stream corridors, ravines and steep slopes. Thus, this recommendations allows for the lowest single-family residential density available under the Kent regulations. Mr. O'Neill pointed out that if the Commission recommends that a lower Comprehensive Plan designation for the area north of 208th, then the zoning designation should be the same. For example, any area designated SF 1 on the Comprehensive Plan, it should be zoned RA, because that zoning designation would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation. Commissioner Haylor asked if the topography was different for the area to the north of 202nd since both King County and the Planning Department under Alternative 3 recommends a lower density that the rest of the area. Mr. O'Neill replied that area does not seem to contain any environmentally sensitive areas."underdeveloped" explained that der toe land he Soos Creek Plan, any undeveloped or underdeveloped parcels that were close to existing City limits were given higher density zoning designations. Mr. Harmon read a statement about the concerns about this area. Mr. Harmon commented that the area should be designated as single family zoning. Ms. Harmon expressed concern about the access to the property that is below hers. There is only one way in and out, and that is off of 208th, onto a cul-de-sac. That property should either stay as E Planning Commission Minutes October 25, 1993 a green belt or if it must be developed, zoned for one unit per acre. Robert Servoss, 9420 S. 207th Place, commented he had moved there s and privacy of the neighborhood. He because of the uniquenes is lot is about one-third to one - would like that preserved. H fourth acre in size. Several people who spoke during the Comprehensive Plan portion ess of the kproblems with traffic,e again concerning the apaterrinthe ste pne less ss of ty based slopes- on and Judy Shemeta, 9405 S. 205th Place, supported the previous arguments. She felt the least possible density should be designated for the slope area. Ervin Fleming, 20541 92nd Avenue S. conmented he felt that the area should be zoned for half acre lots with single dwellings and cluster development should not be allowed. Discussion ensued about parks in the area. There are no parks in the area. Mr. Ross read and submitted a letter into the record. The owner intends on developing the property as lower density owner -occupied townhomes. One portion of the letter mentioned that because of the slopes, riparian corridor, and limited access, it appears that only one-third of the site is suitable for development. Approximately two-thirds of the site would be left in the natural state. Mr. Ross commented that approximately 60-00 units of townhones could reasonably be developed on the site. These would be constructed in different configurations but each would be approximately 1400 square feet in size and have two plus parking spaces per dwelling. This would density ecuals about 2.1 to 2.8 units per acre of the 29 acre property. This is the type of density they are requesting and not the higher densities of the MRG or MRD zoning. Mr. Ross requested that a zoning classification of R1-12 be designated for this property. The intent is not to develop the property with 12,000 square foot lots, however. It is felt that only a clustered type of development would be appropriate for this site. Further, because of the site constraints, the RA designation would effectively deny the owners any reasonable use of the property. There would need to be soil engineering survey and soil analysis done. In addition, more open space would be provided with the clustering type of development. D Planning Commission Minutes October 25, 1993 Commissioner Haylor commented that when you're talking about clustering townhouses, it still means some type of multifamily dwellings. The public hearing was closed at 10:20 PM. A discussion ensued concerning continuing the meetingthe Commissioners to consider the in order for informtion hearing and make a recommendation to the city council. at the MOTION WAS MADE and SECONDED to at adjourn ur P he hearing MOTION Card continue the meeting to November 8, Respectfully submitted, 10 KENT PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES November 8, 1993 The meeting of the Kent Planning Commission was called to order by Acting Chair Heineman at 7:00 pm on November 8, 1993 in the Kent City Hall, Chambers West. PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS PRESENT: Edward Heineman, Jr. Gwen Dahle Kenneth Dozier Bob MacIssac Kent Morrill Janet Nuss PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBER ABSENT: Albert Haylor Christopher Grant Raymond Ward PLANNING STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: James P. Harris, Planning Director Fred Satterstrom, Planning Manager Kevin O'Neill, Planner Matt Jackson, Planner Chris Holden, Recording Secretary OTHER STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Bill Wolinski, Public Works APPROVAL OF OCTOBER 25, 1993 MINUTES The MOTION was made to accept the October 25, 1993 minutes as presented. The motion was SECONDED. Motion CARRIED. OTHER COMMUNICATIONS/MEETINGS Mr. Harris mentioned the Planning Commissioners are invited to attend a meeting on November 30, 1993, a Capital Facilities seminar with the City Council will be held from 5 PM to 9 PM. The following continued hearings were for Planning Commission deliberation and recommendation to the City Council exclusively. 1 Planning Commission Minutes November 8, 1993 ICPA-93-2 CHESTNUT RIDGE A continuation from October 25, 1993 concerning the initial Comprehensive Plan land use designations for the Chestnut Ridge Annexation Area. The area is bounded by S. 200th Street on the north, 100th Avenue S. on the east, S. 208th Street on the south and 92nd Avenue S. on the west. City staff is recommending that the area be designated as SF 6, Single Family, north of 208th Street and SF 1, Single Family, south of 208th Street. Chair Nuss made a MOTION that the Alternative ml be approved. MOTION died for lack of a second. A observation was made that due to the steepness of the area as well as the desire of the majority of residents in the area to preserve the current status quo, Alternative 1 should be approved. In opposition, another comment was made that the zoning should be changed to allow cluster housing. There would still be less density, but the property owner would be able to obtain a reasonable return on the property. Further discussion mentioned that since the City of Kent already has a large portion of its housing in multifamily, no further multifamily zoning should be considered. It was mentioned that allowing cluster housing to be constructed in this area, would help preserve a green belt and well as help alleviate some of the drainage problems in the area. It was MOVED and SECONDED that Alternative 1 BE sent to the City Council for final approval. MOTION CARRIED. Mr. Satterstrom asked if the single-family overlay would be considered for this area. Chair Heineman thought it was included in the Planning Ccmmission's recommendation to the City Council. Commissioner Dozier asked if a modification could be made to allow cluster housing in this area. Mr. Harris stated the City does not have a cluster housing ordinance. Further, a Planned Unit Development housing can only be considered in multifamily zoned areas. #AZ -93-1 CHESTNUT RIDGE ANNEXATION AREA INITIAL ZONING The previous hearing of October 25, 1993 concerning the land use zoning for the newly annexed area of Kent. This area, which is approximately 187 acres, is generally bounded by S. 200th Street to the north, S. 208th Street to the south, 92nd Avenue S. to the west, and 100th Avenue S. to the east. Subsequent to the annexation of the area by the City, the entire area was zoned R1-20, Single -Family Residential, pursuant to Section F. Planning Commission Minutes November 8, 1993 15.03.020(E)(2) of the Kent Zoning Code. The purpose of this process is to establish initial zoning for the annexation area, as outlined in Section 15.09.055 of the Zoning Code. Chair Heineman asked that Alternative 2 view foil be shown. This alternative recommends R1-7.2 for the area north of S. 208th Street and R1-12 for the area south of 208th Street. Under King County, a portion of the area was zoned as Growth Reserve, 1 lot per 5 acres until the end of 1994 and then the zoning would become RS -5000. Alternative 3 recommended MRD, Duplex Multifamily, for the around south of 208th and a portion to the north of S. 208th; R1-7.2, Single Family Residential, between S. 208th and S. 202nd and north of S. 202nd, R1-5.0, Single Family Residential. Mr. O'Neill explained that the previous County zoning was RS -9600. A property owner, while still under King County jurisdiction, applied for both a subdivision and a planned unit development. At this point, the subdivision is vested. The Planned Unit Development application is not vested. Alternative 1 proposes that the overall density remain the same, R1-9.6. MOTION 1,L?DE and SECONDED to accept zoning Alternative 1. MOTION PASSED. This matter will go to City Council on November 16 and be schedule two public hearings, 30 days apart. Two dates have been set for December 7, 1993 and January 18, 1994. MOTION MADE and SECONDED to adjourn the public hearing at 7:40 PM. MOTION PASSED. Respectfully submitted, Jame P% Harris, Recording Secretary %I 3. CONSENT CALENDAR City Council Action: II Councilmember moves, Councilme er seconds that Consent Calendar Items A through Q be approved. Discussi Acti 3A. Approval of Minutes. Approval of the minutes of the special Council meetings of December 30, 1993, and January 2, 1994, and the regular meeting of January 4, 1994. 3B. Approval of Bills. Approval of payment of the bills received through November 30, 1993, after auditing by the Operations Committee on December 7, 1993. These figures were inadvertently omitted from the minutes of December 7, 1993. Approval of checks issued for vouchers: Date 11-1/11-15 11-16/11-29 Check Numbers 135988-136405 136406-136881 Approval of checks issued for payroll: Date Check Numbers 11-19-93 Check # 188105-188440 Advice # 10668-10996 12-3-93 Check # 188441-188841 Advice # 10997-11379 Amount $1,284,586.27 1,830,372.16 Amount $ 270,528.32 395,925.01 321,372.08 433,178.90 Payment of the bills received through December 31, 1993, after auditing by the Operations Committee at its meeting on January 4, 1994, was approved on January 4, 1994. Council Agenda Item No. 3 A -B Kent, Washington December 30, 1993 A special meeting of the Kent City Council was called to order at 6:00 p.m. by Mayor Pro Tem Woods. Present: Councilmembers Bennett, Houser, Johnson, Mann, Orr and White, Chief Adminis- trative Officer McCarthy, City Attorney Lubovich, Public Works Director Wickstrom, Acting Finance Director Miller, and Acting Parks Director Thorell. Approximately 150 people were in attendance. 1993 Budget Adjustment Ordinance. The budget adjustment ordi- nance totals $28,476,848. This budget adjustment is primarily a housekeeping adjustment consolidating individual budget changes into one ordinance. $27,576,353 of this amount has been pre- viously approved by Council. The additional amount of $900,495 has not been officially approved by the Council but is needed to be in compliance with the State Auditor's requirements. The majority of these adjustments have been discussed with the Budget Committee or are housekeeping in nature to close projects. Revenues, grants, charges to City departments or fund balance provide sources of funding for all budget adjustments. In addition to the budget adjustments, two lines of credit are necessary to cover funds that are required to be spent before they are reimbursed. $200,000 is needed from the Capital Improvement Fund to cover December Lake Fenwick Trail construc- tion costs, until the funds are received from King County Open Space Bonds in January 1994. A line of credit of $85,000 from the General Fund is needed to cover the Housing and Community Development Fund expenditures until the funds are reimbursed by King County. A detailed explanation of the budget changes was included in the packet. Acting Finance Director Miller noted that 97% of the adjustments have been approved, and that $20,000,000 of it is for refinancing debt. She noted that refinancing will save the City $849,952 in present value debt service. She stated that of the 3% which has not been approved, $635,000 was to record a seized asset project. She added that $130,000 was for Workers Comp and $43,000 was for Unemployment. She urged the Council to adopt the proposed ordinance. JOHNSON MOVED to adopt Ordinance No. 3147 relating to the 1993 Budget Adjustments. Orr seconded and the motion carried. city organization Plan. Mayor Pro Tem Woods announced that letters regarding Mayor -Elect White's proposed Veorganization plan have been received from the following: CB Commercial Real Estate Group, Inc., Trammell Crow Company, Hill Investment Company, Birtcher Frank Properties, Jack R. Bennett, Lance Mueller & Associates --Architects, Carpinito Brothers, Inc., Kent Police Guild, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc., and Robison 1 December 30, 1993 Construction, Inc. ORR MOVED to make the letters part of the record. Johnson seconded and the motion carried. Woods then read letters from Paul Morford, Henry D. Mairs, and Public Works Department Staff. ORR MOVED to make those letters part of the record. Mann seconded and the motion carried. Woods reported that she and White have discussed this issue and have agreed to receive input tonight from the Council and the audience, but that action will not be taken. She noted that a combined Budget and Operations Committee meeting will be held on Monday, January 3rd, at 3:30 p.m. to discuss this issue, and that it will be brought to the Council meeting of January 4th for action. Mayor -Elect White noted that it was not his intent that the reorganization be done on the front page of the newspaper, and that Councilmembers had been briefed on the plan. He stated that department directors have become accustomed to having their own way in matters of policy, budget and employment, and that they will no longer come to the Council for approval of things that could not be obtained through the Mayor. He explained that he asked all department directors to resign because each is operat- ing independently, with little regard to any centralized policy making body, and they have become very turf conscious and less and less responsive to the citizens. He stated that nine posi- tions in upper management need to be eliminated and replaced by three: a Director of Operations, a Director of Public Safety, and a Director of Community and Economic Development. He added that the Director of Parks and Recreation would be retained. He said he has recruited a person who has served with distinction in municipal government to serve as the Director of Operations, and that this person will recommend managers for each division. He said he has recruited a nationally known person as Director of Public Safety. He added that two City employees and several others are being considered for the Director of Community and Economic Development. He noted that Parks and Recreation would be the fourth department and that he is currently reviewing all applications that were received when the Parks Director resigned earlier in the year. White noted that the nine positions he has proposed to eliminate are paid nearly $1,000,000, and that the four positions which would replace them would cost approximately $400,000. He also spoke about overtime, the elimination of two positions, training for employees, the employee classification system, and the use of outside consultants. He said his plan includes a severance package for those whom he has asked to resign, and that attrition will take care of any employee reductions. He pointed out that the people who have been asked to resign are not eliminated from other positions in the City, and that he has asked for their input. He noted that this plan will save taxpayers more than 2 December 30, 1993 $1.5 million during his four-year term and urged the Council to pass it. Pat McShane, 925 Hemlock Street, noted that while streamlining may be necessary, the inner structure is needed and Council - members should take a long hard look at this issue. Mike Grant, SeaTac, noted that he worked for the Kent Police Department for 25 years, and that he also has experience in fire service. He said that Police and Fire functions cannot be done well together, and that while he agrees with streamlining, it is a mistake to combine the two departments. Gary Volchock, CB Commercial, Seattle, distributed additional copies of letters from developers along with a letter from Fisher Properties. He said that the City of Kent is the easiest and best of the cities in South King County to work with because of the directors of the departments, especially Don Wickstrom. He pointed out that the letters received and distributed are all in support of Wickstrom, and some support Planning Director Harris and others as well. Volchok noted that Wickstrom has been very good at acquiring matching funds that others might not be able to get from the State for roads and utility projects. He said that Wickstrom's skills and experience have paid many dividends for the city. He pointed out that the Public Works staff respect and support him, and that Wickstrom is not adversarial, is cooperative, consis- tent, predictable, and is available when needed. He said Wickstrom is also willing to consider reasonable alternatives. He added that Wickstrom has been working on a way to raise over $1,000,000 for the city without raising taxes. He pointed out that Wickstrom was able to acquire one of only eight public 404 wetland permits issued in the last seven years in Washington. He stated that Wickstrom has the best interest of the city in mind and recommended that he remain the Public Works Director. He noted that City employees are worried about their jobs and that the City will lose by attrition. He thanked the Council on behalf of all the parties who presented letters and urged them to retain Wickstrom. ORR MOVED to make Volchok's letters a part of the record. Houser seconded and the motion carried. John Keefe, 10031 SE 258 Place, stated that the Planning Department and the Public Works Department are both totally professional, and that the Police and Fire Departments seem to work well together. He said the integrity of the department leaders is something to be proud of. He recommended further analysis of the plan, including public involvement. Frank Connelly, Kent Police Guild, spoke is opposition to the proposal. He said they agree with White regarding increasing services to the public and cutting costs, but that they disagree with the way to achieve that. He said they have full faith and support in 3 December 30, 1993 Chief Crawford, and listed some of his accomplishments. He questioned where the savings would come from, since it appears that four people would be added to the nine already in place. He added that the Police Department works well as is. Harry Shutts noted that he has worked for the City for many years. He ex- plained that delays on projects can cost over $1,000 an hour, and that Wickstrom makes immediate decisions when there is a problem, resulting in thousands of dollars being saved for the city. He noted that Wickstrom has a very good memory and does not have to go through files to know what happened on any project. He also stated that he appreciates the freedom Wickstrom allows his staff in the field, and noted that Wickstrom's rules are the same for everyone. He urged the Council to keep Mr. Wickstrom. Steven Foster, 5216 S. 212th, stated that he is a taxpayer in Kent and that if White's plan can save money while providing the needed services, it deserves to be implemented. Carol Stoner, 19708 121st, Renton, stated that now that the city has a full time mayor, it is a logical time to look at restructing government, but urged the Council to look at the human resources already available. She suggested making use of the expertise of long time employees. She noted that Wickstrom and Harris are profes- sionals who have served through two very different part-time mayors, and, as professionals, are adaptable and can serve through other administrations and under other structures as well. She pointed out that Harris has seen that his staff has exper- ience doing a wide variety of projects. She added that the task force on the sewerage lagoon has run very smoothly because of the people Don Wickstrom put on it, and reiterated that the expertise in the City should be considered. Bill Doolittle, 412 N. Washington, said he would like to see further information on where the savings and expenses would come from. He also requested that the proposed plan be compared to the one proposed at the last Council retreat. He suggested that a change in location for the combined Budget/Operations Committee meeting may be necessary. It was later agreed that the meeting would be held at the Senior Center. Lt. Sam Grubbs, Kent Fire Department, stated that Chief Angelo has always been open to input from staff, and the morale in the department has been very high until the last two years. He stated that the morale in the department has gone down because of the city administration, not because of the Chief or the admin- istrators. He said that it is Angelo's job to protect his people and get the best for them. He urged the Council to refrain from adopting something that may not work and may cost more in the long run. Bill Wolinski, who is in charge of the Environment Engineering Section of the Public Works Department, said he left the City of Baltimore to come work for Don Wickstrom, and cautioned the Council to carefully look at the expertise and 4 December 30, 1993 cumulative experience, the track record, and the proven success of the department before accepting the reorganization plan. He said Wickstrom inspires confidence, demonstrates a pro -active approach to dealing with problems, and has fostered cooperation within the department and amongst departments. He said he is proud to work for Wickstrom and it would be a tragedy to lose him. Police Officer Mike Painter spoke in support of Chief Crawford. He noted that society is violent, and is getting worse, and that this type of thing only makes it harder on the people who work on the streets. He said that it is possible that restructuring may be needed, but that the loss of Ed Crawford would be a tremendous blow to the department. He said Crawford is the most compassionate leader he has ever been around, that they are worried, and that he will help in any way he can. Van Parker of the Public Works Department also offered his help to anyone who is willing to listen, noting that the City has good people working for them, and that they have good ideas. Ton McCarthy agreed that the City has many great employees, and said they can't be blamed for the past mayor's management style. He said that all the department heads have done a great job and urged the Council to give them a chance. Hans Rasmussen, Director of Kent Youth and Family Services, spoke in support of Chief Crawford, noting that the Police Department has always supported funding for youth. He cited Project Lighthouse as an example, and urged the Council to keep chief Crawford. Stan Wade, Construction Engineer for the Public Works Department, stated that Don Wickstrom and Gary Gill are fair-minded, and agreed that staff is capable of solving problems under proper leadership. He said that Wickstrom has the respect of his employees, can carry out policies, has a great memory, has the ability to find funds, and that it would be a travesty to lose him. He asked them to consider doing further study to see how Wickstrom can be allowed to carry on in his function while satisfying their demands. Police Officer Kathy Holt stated that Chief Crawford has brought a tremendous sense of well-being and high morale to the department and urged the Council not to support the public safety division. She said that if a public safety division were formed, Chief Crawford may leave, which would decrease morale and productivity. Police Officer Randy Bourne also spoke in support of Chief Crawford and noted that having one person in charge of Police and Fire would not be effective, because of the diversity. There were no further comments from the audience. White thanked the employees for their input attend a meeting Monday morning with their gestions. He added that questions could be writing. He said that he stands behind his 5 and invited them to questions and sug- submitted to him in proposal, but that December 30, 1993 Council may choose to make changes to it. He said that the purpose of the reorganization is to free up money to use else- where, and to put greater emphasis on public safety. He said he has great respect for the department heads. Mann said that although Councilmembers were briefed, it was very brief, and he was not aware of the details of the plan or that the powers of the Police Chief and Fire Chief would be diminished. He said he asked Chief Crawford not to consider resigning, and that he feels the same way about Chief Angelo. He asked the Budget and Operations Committees to consider this. He said he does not want someone over Crawford and Angelo depriving them of any of their powers. JOHNSON MOVED that Mayor -Elect White's reorganization plan be referred to the combined Budget and Operations Committee which will meet next Monday. Bennett seconded and the motion carried. Woods reiterated that the Council is committed to working with the Mayor -elect on the reorganization plan, and asked the employees to make the same commitment, since their help is needed. Councilmember Orr. Woods noted that this is the last Council meeting for Councilmember Orr. She stated that Leona Orr has served the city well, has served with dedication and commitment, and with excellence and distinction. Ms. Orr was given a standing ovation. The meeting adjourned at 7:35 p.m. Brenda Ja ob , CMC City Cle 2 Kent, Washington January 2, 1994 A special meeting of the Kent City Council was called to order at 6.00 p.m. by Mayor White. Present: Councilmembers Bennett, Clark, Johnson, Mann and Woods, and City Attorney Lubovich. Approximately 10 people were at the meeting. he and Councilmembers Clark and Johnson Mayor White noted that were sworn in on December 30, 1993. White then nominated Robert McSeveney as Municipal Court Judge for the City of Kent. WOODS MOVED to support the nomination. Mann seconded. The motion carried. Judge Ottinger of Issaquah noted that it is traditional to have a judge from another court perform the swearing in ceremony. She then administered the Oath of Office. She added that robing of the judge is also traditional, and Patty McSeveney performed that honor. McSeveney stated that Judge Ottinger's court is run with fairness and professionalism, and that she has had a considerable influence on him. He said he is impressed with the way the Kent Municipal Court has come together, and that he will try his best to be fair in all matters and will try to make the court one that is functional, professional and user-friendly. The meeting then adjourned at 6:05 p.m. Brenda Ja obe , CMC City Cler Kent, Washington January 4, 1994 Regular meeting of the Kent City Council was called to order by Mayor White at 7:00 p.m. Present: Councilmembers Clark, Houser, Johnson, Mann and Woods, Chief Administrative Officer McCarthy, City Attorney Lubovich, Planning Director Harris, Public Works Director Wickstrom, Fire Chief Angelo; Police Chief Crawford, Acting Finance Director Miller and Acting Parks Director Thorell. Councilmember Bennett was excused from the meeting. Approxi- mately 90 people were at the meeting. PUBLIC Oath of Office. The City Clerk administered COMMUNICATION the Oath of Office to newly elected Mayor White and Councilmembers Clark, Houser and Johnson. (Mayor White and Councilmembers Clark and Johnson were officially sworn in on December 30, 1993, and Councilmember Houser was officially sworn in on January 3, 1994.) Rae Reitan Day. Mayor White noted that Rae Reitan became Kent's City Historian in 1982 and that she came from a pioneer family who moved to this area in 1875 when it was still the Washington Territory. He said Mrs. Reitan was a driving force in preserving the history of Kent and gave walking tours of downtown Kent and visited schools dressed in a long dress and bonnet to present a slide show and tell stories to school children in an effort to help them understand the place and people from which they came. He noted that she recognized the value of preserving the past and was a charter member of the White River Historical Society and played a significant role in the formation of the Greater Kent Historical Society. He added that Mrs. Reitan spent every Monday morning as a volunteer at the Information Desk at City Hall where she provided information and a cheerful and friendly welcome to those calling or visiting. He then declared January 5, 1994, as Rae Reitan Day in the City of Kent. Mrs. Reitan's son, Ed Reitan, Jr., thanked the Mayor for the proclamation and noted that she had a very positive impact on the citizens of Kent. 1 January 4, 1994 Employee of the Month. The Mayor announced that PUBLIC COMMUNICATION James Merritt of the Fire Department has been named Employee of the Month for January. He noted that Merritt is a highly motivated, positive person and an excellent team leader. He added that in addition to fire fighting, he has taken on extra projects such as emergency medical training, defibrillation, truck opera- tions, and the dive team. Chief Angelo stated that Merritt is one of the best cut men, which takes great courage and skill. He expressed his pride and appreciation and offered his congratulations. Regional Justice Center Update. Wendy Keller, Project Director, noted that they are currently working on code issues and so forth on the inside of the building, that a remediation plan has been submitted, that they are developing a demolition plan, and that the technical com- mittee will meet at the end of January. She noted that by the end of the month they will have new information for the City in regard to parking and traffic. She noted that demolition is still scheduled for May of this year, and construction is scheduled for April of 1995. Keller offered to brief the new Councilmembers on the project if desired. CONSENT WOODS MOVED that Consent Calendar Items A and the CALENDAR through E be approved. Houser seconded motion carried. MINUTES (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3A) of Minutes. APPROVAL of the minutes of Approval the regular Council meeting of December 7, 1993. STREETS (OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4A) Improvements on 111th Avenue LID 343 -,,Street S.E. The Public Works Committee, has recom- mended adoption of a resolution setting February 1st as the public hearing date for LID 343 - Street Improvements on 111th Avenue S.E. from Kent-Kangley Road to Sequoia Junior High School. 2 January 4, 1994 STREETS Wickstrom noted that Councilmember Bennett requested that this item be placed under Other Business, and that Bennett is not in attendance tonight. He asked that this item be continued to the next meeting so that Bennett can provide input. There was no objection and it was so ordered. STREET (PUBLIC HEARINGS - ITEM 2C) VACATION S. 231st Street (Landing Way) Street Vacation STV -94-1. This public hearing has been set to consider an application by Birtcher VDL Land Partnership to vacate a portion of S. 231st Street (also known as Landing Way S.), as referenced in Resolution No. 1374. Due to an error in the resolution setting the hearing date, after public testimony is taken on this issue tonight, the hearing will be continued to the January 18, 19941 City Council meeting in order to provide City staff enough time to research and provide Council a report on this proposed street vacation. Mayor White declared the public hearing open. Dan Ivanoff, representing Birtcher Frank Properties, noted that he will be available to discuss this issue at the next Council meeting. WOODS MOVED that the public hearing be continued to January 18, 1994. Johnson seconded and the motion carried. TRAFFIC (PUBLIC HEARINGS - ITEM 2A) CONTROL LID 344 - Traffic Signal at 108th Avenue S.E. and S.E. 240th St. This date has been set for a public hearing on LID 344, Traffic Signal at 108th Avenue S.E. and S.E. 240th Street. Public Works Director Wickstrom pointed out the loca- tion and noted that the project consists of the installation of a fully actuated 8 -phase traffic signal with pedestrian detection and crossing indications. He noted that the City proposes to fund $79,006.45 of the project and that the balance of $71,702.75 shall be funded by the LID. He explained the method and payment of assessments, and noted that property owners representing 34.81°% of the LID assessment are committed to the LID via LID no protest covenants, and that 6.58% of property owners 3 January 4, 1994 TRAFFIC without covenants expressed support, giving a CONTROL potential support level of 41.390. Mayor White declared the public hearing open. There were no comments from the audience and WOODS MOVED to close the public hearing. Houser seconded and the motion carried. WOODS THEN MOVED to direct the City Attorney to prepare the ordinance creating LID 344. Johnson seconded and the motion carried. ANNEXATION (PUBLIC HEARINGS - ITEM 2B) Everson Annexation. This date has been set for a public hearing on the final Council action necessary for completion of the Everson Annexation. Public Works Director Wickstrom pointed out the location of the annexation and noted that it contains approximately 60 acres. He stated that the assessed valuation is $2,590,846 and that it involves 28 parcels, with a population of 57. He noted that the Boundary Review Board approved this on November 12, 1993. Mayor White opened the public hearing. There were no comments from the audience and WOODS MOVED to close the hearing. Johnson seconded and the motion carried. WOODS THEN MOVED to direct the City Attorney to prepare the necessary ordinance on the Everson Annexation. Houser seconded and the motion carried. PERMITS (OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4D) Vesting of Development Permit Applications. State law mandates that certain development standards lock -in, or "vest", upon filing a completed building permit or subdivision appli- cation. This ordinance specifically establishes the City's requirements for a completed building permit or subdivision application, as authorized by State law, in order to resolve any questions or ambiguities as to what constitutes a com- pleted application and, hence, when development rights vest. City Attorney Lubovich stated that this ordi- nance was drafted to define what a completed building application is, which would allow for vesting of land use regulations. He clarified that it does not constitute an approved project 4 January 4, 1994 PERMITS or a completed application, and explained that it allows a developer to have the option to do discretionary review before submitting an application. . HOUSER MOVED that Ordinance No. 3149, determin- ing the specific requirements or vesting certain development permit applications, be adopted. Woods seconded and the motion carried. REORGANIZATION (OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4E) PLAN (ADDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT WOODS) City Reorganization Plan City Attorney Lubovich distributed copies of a proposed ordinance and explained that the combined Budget and Operations Committee yesterday voted to recommend adoption of a portion of the Mayor's proposed reorganization plan. He noted that this would create a Department of Operations and delete the existing Human Resources, Finance, and Information Services Departments and make them divisions of the Operations Department. He said it would also create a Public Information/ Ombudsman division, and that the City Clerk's Office and the Municipal Court would also be a part of the Operations Department. He said that the committee decided not to make any changes to the Police and Fire Departments, and held off at this point on the Community and Economic Development Department. He said the proposed ordinance creates managers positions within the Operations Department and removes the Police and Fire Chiefs from Civil Service, with the excep- tion of the incumbents, and it provides for the appointment of the Court Administrator by the Mayor without confirmation by the Council. JOHNSON MOVED to approve Ordinance No. 3150. Houser seconded. JOHNSON THEN MOVED to amend a portion of Section 2.17.020 to read as follows: "The operations director shall be appointed by and serve at the pleasure of the mayor. The division managers shall be appointed by the operations director subject to the approval of the mayor and shall serve at the pleasure of the E January 4, 1994 REORGANIZATION operations director. The city clerk shall be PLAN confirmed by the city council. All appointees to the position of operations director are terminable at will by the mayor. All appointees to the division manager positions are terminable at will by the operations director except for those positions currently covered by collective bargaining agreements." Houser agreed to the friendly amendment. JOHNSON THEN MOVED to amend Section 5 by adding the following words to the end of the last sentence: "and shall be terminable at will by the Operations Director". Lubovich clarified that the sentence would read "The Court Adminis- trator shall be appointed by the Operations Director subject to approval of the Mayor and shall be terminable at will by the Operations Director". Houser agreed to this friendly amendment as well. Councilmember Clark noted that at a recent Council meeting, a citizen urged the Council to look for greater efficiency, and said he feels that this proposal is a solid one. He urged Councilmembers to support the proposal. White emphasized that they will continue to look at the City organization and find ways to do things better. The motion to adopt Ordinance No. 3150, as amended, then carried. COUNCIL (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3E) (ADDED BY COUNCILMEMBER WOODS) Excused Absence. APPROVAL of a request from Councilmember Bennett for an excused absence from tonight's meeting, due to illness. (OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4C) council President. City of Kent Resolution No. 1094 states that the City Council must elect its president, who shall also serve as Mayor Pro Tem, in January of this year for a two-year term. MANN MOVED that Dr. Judy Woods be the City Council President for a two-year term until January, 1996. Johnson seconded and the motion carried. 2 January 4, 1994 SISTER CITY (OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4B) POLICY sister City Affiliation Policy. The Operations Committee has recommended adoption of a resolu- tion which establishes the Kent Sister Cities Association (KSCA) which will provide structure and continuity to Sister City Affiliates under a 501-C3 nonprofit organization. This nonprofit organization is a collaborative effort between the Kent Chamber of Commerce, the Kent School District, Green River College, and the City of Kent. The City has three sister cities, Kaibara, Japan; Kherson, Ukraine; Yangzhou, China; and a friendship city in Maanshan, China. HOUSER MOVED to adopt Resolution No. 1380 establishing the Kent Sister Cities Association (KSCA) which will provide continuity and structure for sister cities affiliated with the City of Kent. Mann seconded and the motion carried. POLICE (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3C) DEPARTMENT Stay out of Areas of Prostit ADOPTION of issuance and Prostitution enforcement of Areas" orders. 48, relating to the "Stay Out of This ordinance provides for the issuance of "Stay Out of Areas of Prostitution (SOAP)" orders, which are intended to keep certain offenders out of high risk prostitution areas. SOAP orders can be issued to anyone charged with prostitution, permitting prostitution or patronizing a prostitute as a condition of probation or pre-trial release. Further, this ordinance also allows police officers to arrest violators of SOAP orders without a warrant once they determine that probable cause for such arrest exists. Finally, any person found in violation of a SOAP order shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, punishable by imprisonment or fine or both. FIRE (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3D) DEPARTMENT Fire Department Medical Physicals - Contract. AUTHORIZATION for the Mayor to sign the Medical Examinations Services Contract with Occupational Health Services Valley Medical Center. 7 January 4, 1994 FIRE The Fire Department plans to solicit RFP's for DEPARTMENT medical physicals every three (3) years in order to keep costs at a minimum. RFP's were received from Occupational Health Services Valley Medical Center and Virginia Mason Hospital for the years 1994 through 1996. After reviewing the RFP's for services, respon- siveness, flexibility, scheduling, cost and program management, the Fire Chief and Public Safety Committee recommend that the contract be awarded to Occupational Health Services Valley Medical Center. An annual budget has been established. Since the account exceeds $15,000, an RFP and a contract are required. FINANCE (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3B) Approval of Bills. APPROVAL of payment of the bills received through December 31, 1993 after auditing by the Operations Committee at its meeting on January 4, 1994. Approval of checks issued for vouchers: Date 12-1/12-15 12-16/12-30 Check Numbers 136882-137420 137420-137900 Amount $5,506,581.26 21391,652.73 Approval of checks issued for payroll: Date Check Numbers Amount 12-20-93 Check # 188842-189156 $ 276,172.15 Advice # 11380-11724 396,182.62 Check # 189157 thru 119160 "voided" 1-5-94 Check # 191601-191893 258,114.62 Advice # 12051-12380 371,963.17 H January 4, 1994 REPORTS Council President. Woods thanked her colleagues for their confidence in re-electing her as Council President, and said committee appoint- ments will be made after the Council vacancy is filled. She asked Councilmembers to provide input as to what committees they would be interested in serving on. REPORTS Woods announced that the Suburban Cities Association will host the new Metro/County Council officials, including County Executive Gary Locke, next Wednesday, and encouraged Councilmembers to make reservations as soon as possible. Public Safety Committee., Mann announced that the date for their regularly scheduled meeting is a holiday, January 17, and therefore they will not meet again until February 7. He added that if issues arise which need to be addressed, a meeting time and place will be announced. EXECUTIVE At 7:50 p.m., Mayor White announced an executive SESSION session of approximately 15 minutes to discuss property acquisition issues. PROPERTY The meeting reconvened at 8:02 p.m. Lubovich ACQUISITION announced that discussion was held regarding property acquisition for the Community Health Clinic, and noted that approximately $150,000 is available in the 1994 budget for property acquisition. He stated that the proposal is to transfer those funds to the Community Health Clinic for the purpose of development and property acquisition for the local clinic, to enter into an agreement with them, and if the properties are not acquired, to receive either the funds back or the title of the property. WOODS MOVED to grant the funds to the Community Health Clinic and to enter into an agreement subject to the approval of the Mayor. Johnson seconded and the motion carried. ' ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 8:05 p.m. Brenda J ob , CMC City Cle k N Kent City Council Meeting Date January 18 1994_ Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: CARPINITO BUSINESS PARK REZONE (RZ-93-3) 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Authorization to set February 1, 1994, as the date for a public meeting to consider the Hearing Examiner's recommendation of approval for a rezone application (RZ-93-3) submitted by Mark W. Stiefel. The property is located on the south side of S. 222nd street, approximately 250 feet east of 84th Avenue S. (East Valley Highway). 3. EXHIBITS: None 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Hearing Examiner (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO > YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended RN EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 3C V� Kent City Council Meeting Date January 18, 1994 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: CHESTNUT RIDGE ANNEXATION AREA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP AMENDMENT - RESOLUTION 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Adoption of Resolution No.� amending the City-wide Comprehensive Land Use Map to designate the entire Chestnut Ridge annexation area as Single Family (SF), as depicted in Alternative Plan No. 1, attached as Exhibit "A" to resolution. 3. EXHIBITS: Resolution and exhibit 4. 5. 20 RECOMMENDED BY: Planning Commission (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO_Y YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds �1 DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 3D RESOLUTION NO. C A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, amending the City- wide Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map to designate the entire Chestnut Ridge annexation area as Single Family (SF), as depicted in Alternative No. 1. WHEREAS, the area known as Chestnut Ridge was officially annexed to the City of Kent on May 16, 1993; and WHEREAS, the Kent City Code requires that initial zoning of a recently annexed area must occur within six months of the annexation; and WHEREAS, the City Council at its September 71 1993 meeting adopted Ordinance 3131 providing for a 90 day extension for the zoning designation for the Chestnut Ridge annexation area to allow appropriate public participation and applicable SEPA review; and WHEREAS, the City of Kent held two public hearings before the Planning Commission on October 25, 1993 and November 8, 1993 to allow public testimony on the zoning designation for the Chestnut Ridge annexation area; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the proposed plan amendment changing the City-wide Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map to designate the entire Chestnut Ridge annexation area as Single Family (SF), as depicted in Alternative No. 1 (Exhibit "A"); and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Kent took public testimony in a public hearing on December 7, 1993; and WHEREAS, on December 7, 1993, the City Council for the City of Kent approved the Planning Commission's recommendation of approval for the Chestnut Ridge annexation area Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment as described in Alternative No. 1; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City-wide Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map is hereby amended to designate the entire Chestnut Ridge Annexation Area as, Single Family (SF), as depicted in Alternative No. 1, as set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington this day of , 1994. Concurred in by the Mayor of the City of Kent, this day of , 1994. JIM WHITE, MAYOR 2 ATTEST: BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: ROGER A. LUBOVICH, CITY ATTORNEY I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of Resolution No. , passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, the day of , 1994. chestnut.res BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK 3 ( SEAL) E EXHIBIT "All CHESTNUT RIDGE COMPREHENSIVE 1'LAN ALTERNATIVE 1 A S F 1 SINGLE FAMILY 1 UNIT PER ACRE SF 6 SINGLE FAMILY 4-6 UNITS/ACRE mill mm f =29I�a ff miallimilI ■■�a UIF ®1�P® owls ■ ' �,,''��,�i iii ■, union- a A S F 1 SINGLE FAMILY 1 UNIT PER ACRE SF 6 SINGLE FAMILY 4-6 UNITS/ACRE CITY LIMITS EDANNEXATION AREA DESIGNATION BOUNDARY crryoF Wind Kent City Council Meeting Date January 18 1994 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: LID 344 - TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT 108TH & 240TH - ORDINANCE 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by City Council, adoption of Ordinance No. _315 a forming the Local Improvement District for the installation of a traffic signal at SE 240th Street &. 108th Avenue Southeast. 3. EXHIBITS: Public Works Director memorandum, vicinity map and ordinance 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Council Action 1/4194 (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended /' i\ Not Recommended w 7. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 3E DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Don Wickstrom, Director of Public Works RE: LID 344 - SE 240th St. and 108th Ave. SE Traffic Signal Background Due to a recent accident and other accidents at the above referenced intersection, several petitions from nearby residents were submitted to the City requesting the installation of a traffic signal. City staff has reviewed the signal warrant criteria at the subject intersection and find that sufficient warrants are met. Therefore the staff and the City Council's Public Works Committee have unanimously agreed to pursue the traffic signal installation. The City is proposing to fund a portion of the project cost with the remaining funds being provided by the formation of a Local Improvement District (LID). Therefore Resolution No. 1376 was adopted by City Council on December 7, 1993 establishing January 4, 1993 for the public hearing on the formation of LID 344. Proposed Improvements The project consists of the installation of a fully actuated 8 - phase traffic signal with pedestrian detection and crossing indications at the intersection of SE 240th St. and 108th Ave. SE. Prosect Funding The total estimated cost for the construction of the proposed project including engineering, survey, and construction inspection is $140,000. LID bonding and associated costs add an additional $10,197.21 bringing the grand total to $150,197.21. The City is proposing to fund $79,006.45 of the project total. The balance of $71,702.75 shall be funded by the LID. Committee agreed to the establishment of a project budget including transferring the remaining funds from the 104th/260th signal project ($67,337). The remaining City funds of $11,669.45 will come from the James St. Safety Improvement budget. Method of Assessment An LID assessment boundary was established which includes properties which utilize 108th Ave SE for ingress and egress to SE 240th St. The total LID cost is distributed over these properties based on a zone and termini method as specifically authorized under State law. Under this zone and termini method, 8 zone lines 200 feet apart were established on a radial basis from the signal. The first zone has a weighing factor of 8, the second zone a factor of 7 and so on out to the eighth zone with a factor of 1. The square footage is weighed by multiplying it by these factors. Some properties are included in more than one zone so the square footage within each zone for each parcel is weighted accordingly. This varying assessment rate per square foot was used to account for the reduction in benefit from the signal improvement the properties receive as the distance from the signal increases. Other factors affecting the distribution are as described below: 1. One half of the cost is distributed north of the intersection and the other one half south of the intersection. Bonding costs area added to this amount separately for north and south sides due to the difference number of parcels. 2. The assessment distribution is based on square footage of property. A wetland exists on assessment #14. The wetland area (an approximate estimate) was deleted from the square footage calculation due to development restrictions. On the south side, the cost was also distributed to properties adjacent to the 108th Ave. alignment south to SE 244th St. However, since the road is not currently open south of the 242nd block, the southernmost properties do not currently have access to the signal. Therefore, the potential assessments for these properties were added to the City share of the funding and the LID boundary was drawn to not include these properties in the LID. It should also be noted that originally the City considered including the single family residential properties in the vicinity of SE 236th and 237th Streets, however, this resulted in adding nearly seven thousand dollars to the project cost to collect approximately eight thousand dollars. Therefore, these properties and associated costs were dropped from the LID and the $1,235.83 that could have been collected to actually fund the signal is being funded by the City. Support for LID - Property owners representing 34.81% of the LID assessment are committed to this LID via LID no protest covenants. To approve an LID, property owners with combined LID assessment representing 40% of the total assessment must support the LID by not protesting. However, during preliminary contract with the property owners it was determined that several properties without covenants (6.58%) also expressed supports giving a potential support level of 41.390. This level of support warrants bringing the proposal before the Council. Environmental According to SEPA Rules (WAC categorically exempt from SEPA. Payment of Assessment 197-11-800 2b) signals are Upon Council passing, the ordinance confirming the final assessment roll (after completion of the construction), there is a 30 -day period in which any portion or all of the assessment can be paid without interest charges. After the 30 -day period, the balance is paid over a ten year period wherein each year's payment is 1/10th of the principal plus interest on the unpaid balance. The interest will be what the market dictates. D445 yzNc v� 1 0 -. Z y S MAPLEWOOD AVE ^�a L f-' 'i Z> < 3 KIMBER�l�t� y ti rp ~r:�r ._VE L . L - S 'E. 94TH AVE 94TH AVE t u u 45TH PL •� ' 4 �1 y u 9� 96TH AVE 1 6Ti1 SAV I'•� t y; ti a�� ^ A(. {: i( Q�.4� N i AVE 3 u s •`/�•/� 3AV • 7Ca2 7T /�.') ti; _ t:<• Z.-_ 7TH <,r L } •L r.o t' C�: o n NJSO N 198TH AVE S OAW RRY C'.. wXr.TI�,�lI1�1�%4S x O99TH AVE S ~ N f •jiT� LOtl d = i C (� T _ 4 i z 100THAVE SE CG 100TH AVE SE IFA IOOTW P, S% J " �r> V Am =n1M 4VE SE � 1 y3 r1r 102nD. .Barricade + f1m u Q <r u AVE SE SA m m p N m 103RD �1� N r> yZ AVE 1E H W i O 104TH AVE SE N ` f+7 N -a°i :D; -105TH N Z --q 2 u PL S y O� JF m m m u u f 35 m= u mm 3A4 m W N M 'Al9pt V m v A to J N N W =_ 109TH AVE SE ~ = 1� y S3� IL109TH m q0 AVE S m i o IOBTH AVE 51 = Irk 4 • i y J .../.-" ~ N 109TH PL SE S C +3S 111TH AVE SE 110THH10 PL SE 14 II u (PYz H AVE SE L/M/TS N Prt N N N ti u m 113TH AVE SE fp 114TH A E 8E }n m 0 ^ m 114TH T Q W N j E N R to U = 116TH AVE SE O V 7 1.5CO °"'3177H PL .-• � • X. OT :c'tm y{� SE I I✓ITHA1j�= v ` N F N 1N m m � _ t H N N 3F pcn Ll xp 0 119 - �'E SELA y D 2 119111 a •� 120TH AWE 0Z 120TH 121ST AVE. N D D wom 122H �an zI- O T PL SE a., <, \ w Or 123RD iG 11L 124TH AVE SE LID .344- TRAFFIC SIGNAL ' SE 240TH STREET & 108TH AVE SE 124TH AVE 1 _ n, •+ W • ON '"'a""-.•r�–.:,...,.:,L....1...,.1....�...�ttlaasiulkl�aiau►liauilLAIN ltlti----- - I(FN7 Cl rr L lH1 rS — L L j-- 1 SE 238TH ST ., —_. T--- I --T T- T_ T" T- - 1 • LL�J ♦ I � 1 1 I 1 � I 1 T 11 SE ZZ rH ST - � �----..1.�ctiita17tt1ititllifuYAt4'RIA�JAIlt� j � c zseTx sr 0 1 0 1 O I �- LID. I i' = 02I O EOUNOARY I I �>1 --- I � I FROFOSED - I IEI 5/6MA. L ��— — -- - SE 24OTH S -r-- — — --r — — i A SSESSM ENT ; --- i j CN UME ER I ( 1 O — I ( SE .tarts ST T- —•-T -T_•T•---- •-- PROPOSED L.I.D. FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT 108TII. AVE. S.E. AND S.E. 2 -10TH. ST. /ND/CA TES S/GN;L - LID. COVENANT __—..—_.—__T__—__—__ i __ 7--.—._17Jf11.I1I1L 111JIIL 11At1 IJ1f a11I11112.1 I111.Laa�___..--.—_.___—__ r � I 1 I I 1 I i I T , I 1 , 1 1 r--- 1 SE .tarts ST T- —•-T -T_•T•---- •-- PROPOSED L.I.D. FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT 108TII. AVE. S.E. AND S.E. 2 -10TH. ST. CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE ordering the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of SE 240th Street and 108th Avenue SE all in accordance with Resolution No. 1376 of the City Council; establishing Local Improvement District No. 344 and ordering the carrying out of the proposed improvement; providing that payment for the improvement be made in part by special assessments upon the property in the District, payable by the mode of "payment by bonds"; and providing for the issuance and sale of local improvement district warrants redeemable in cash or other short-term financing and local improvement district bonds. WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 1376 adopted December 7, 1993, the City Council declared its intention to order the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of SE 240th Street and 108th Avenue SE, and fixed January 4, 1994, at 7:00 p.m., local time, in the Council Chambers of the City Hall as the time and place for hearing all matters relating to the proposed improvement and all comments thereon and objections thereto and for determining the method of payment for the improvement; and WHEREAS, the City's Director of Public Works caused an estimate to be made of the cost and expense of the proposed improvement and certified that estimate to the City Council, together with all papers and information in his possession touching the proposed improvement, a description of the boundaries of the proposed local improvement district and a statement of what portion of the cost and expense of the improvement should be borne by the property within the proposed district; and WHEREAS, that estimate is accompanied by a diagram of the proposed improvement showing thereon the lots, tracts, parcels of 0114369.01 land, and other property which will be specially benefited by the proposed improvement and the estimated cost and expense thereof to be borne by each lot, tract and parcel of land or other property; and WHEREAS, due notice of the above hearing was given in the manner provided by law, and the hearing was held by the City Council on the date and at the time above mentioned, and all objections to the proposed improvement were duly considered and overruled by the City Council, and all persons appearing at such hearing and wishing to be heard were heard; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined it to be in the best interests of the City that the improvement as hereinafter described be carried out and that a local improvement district be created in connection therewith; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN as follows: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Kent, Washington (the "City"), orders the installation of a fully actuated 8 -phase traffic signal with pedestrian detection and cross indications at the intersection SE 240th Street and 108th Avenue SE. All of the foregoing shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications therefor prepared by the Director of Public Works of the City, and may be modified by the City Council as long as such modification does not affect the purpose of the improvement. Section 2. There is created and established a local improvement district to be called Local Improvement District No. 344 of the City of Kent, Washington (the "District"), the 0114369.01 -2- boundaries or territorial extent of the District being more particularly described in Exhibit A attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. Section 3. The total estimated cost and expense of the improvement is declared to be $150,709.20. Approximately $71,702.75 of the cost and expense shall be borne by and assessed against the property specially benefited by such improvement included in the District which embraces as nearly as practicable all property specially benefited by such improvement and the balance of such cost and expense shall be paid by the City. Section 4. In accordance with the provisions of RCW 35.44.047, the City may use any method or combination of methods to compute assessments which may be deemed to fairly reflect the special benefits to the properties being assessed. Section 5. Local improvement district warrants may be issued in payment of the cost and expense of the improvement herein ordered to be assessed, such warrants to be paid out of the Local Improvement Fund, District No. 344, hereinafter created and referred to as the Local Improvement Fund, and, until the bonds referred to in this section are issued and delivered to the purchaser thereof, to bear interest from the date thereof at a rate to be established hereafter by the City Finance Director, as issuing officer, and to be redeemed in cash and/or by local improvement district bonds herein authorized to be issued, such interest-bearing warrants to be hereafter referred to as "revenue warrants." In the alternative, the City hereafter may provide by 0114369.01 -3- ordinance for the issuance of other short-term obligations pursuant to chapter 39.50 RCW. The City is authorized to issue local improvement district bonds for the District which shall bear interest at a rate and be payable on or before a date to be hereafter fixed by ordinance. The bonds shall be issued in exchange for and/or in redemption of any and all revenue warrants issued hereunder or other short-term obligations hereafter authorized, including the interfund loans authorized by Section 6, and not redeemed in cash within twenty days after the expiration of the thirty -day period for the cash payment without interest of assessments on the assessment roll for the District. The bonds shall be redeemed by the collection of special assessments to be levied and assessed against the property within the District, payable in annual installments, with interest at a rate to be hereafter fixed by ordinance under the mode of "payment by bonds," as defined by law and the ordinances of the City. The exact form, amount, date, interest rate and denominations of such bonds hereafter shall be fixed by ordinance of the City Council. Such bonds shall be sold in such manner as the City Council hereafter shall determine. Section 6. For the purpose of paying all or a part of the costs of carrying out the improvements within the District pending the receipt of the proceeds of the issuance and sale of the bonds or short-term obligations referred to in Section 5, interfund loans from the General Fund, Water Fund and/or Sewer Fund to the Local Improvement Fund in the maximum aggregate amount of $71,702 are authorized and approved, those loans to be repaid on or before the 0114369.01 -4- issuance of such bonds or obligations from the proceeds thereof. Each of the interfund loans shall bear interest at a variable rate, adjusted the fifteenth and last day of each month, equal to the interest rate of the State of Washington Local Government Investment Pool on the fifteenth and last day of each month. The initial interest rate on the date of each interfund loan shall be determined as of the last preceding interest payment adjustment date. Section 7. In all cases where the work necessary to be done in connection with the making of such improvement is carried out pursuant to contract upon competitive bids (and the City shall have and reserves the right to reject any and all bids), the call for bids shall include a statement that payment for such work will be made in cash warrants drawn upon the Local Improvement Fund. Section 8. The Local Improvement Fund for the District is created and established in the office of the City Finance Director. The proceeds from the sale of revenue warrants or other short-term obligations drawn against the fund which may be issued and sold by the City and the collections of special assessments, interest and penalties thereon shall be deposited in the Local Improvement Fund. Cash warrants to the contractor or contractors in payment for the work to be done by them in connection with the improvement and cash warrants in payment for all other items of expense in connection with the improvement shall be issued against the Local Improvement Fund. Section 9. Within 15 days of the passage of this ordinance there shall be filed with the City Finance Director the title of 0114369.01 -5- the improvement and District number, a copy of the diagram or print showing the boundaries of the District and the preliminary assessment roll or abstract of such roll showing thereon the lots, tracts and parcels of land that will be specially benefited thereby and the estimated cost and expense of such improvement to be borne by each lot, tract or parcel of land. The City Finance Director immediately shall post the proposed assessment roll upon her index of local improvement assessments against the properties affected by the local improvement. Section 10. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force five (5) days from and after its passage and five (5) days following its publication as required by law. ATTEST: BRENDA JACOBER, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: � 2a Special Counsel and Bond Counsel for the City Passed the Approved the Published the day of _ day of day of By JIM WHITE, Mayor 1994. 1994. 1994. I certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No. passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the City of Kent as hereon indicated. (SEAL) BRENDA JACOBER, City Clerk 0114369.01 -6- EXHIBIT A PROPOSED PRELIMINARY LID LEGAL DESCRIPTION C:.TOBER 11, 1993 LID 344 SE 240TH STREET & 108TH AVE SE TRAr'FIC SIGNAL AND ALSO In Section 17, Township 22 North, Range 5 East, Tax Lot x903 ; Lot 1 of Kent SPC 78-34 Recording Number 7812200838 saidapler described as follows uartere of the east /southwest quarter southeast23 of the quarter the of the southeast q north 200 feet thereof less County roads; AND ALSO heast corner of the southeast quarter o Beginning at the nort the southwest quarter of Section 17, Township 22 North, Range 5 East; thence south along the east linethence thereof 1 0000feet; thence North 89'37108" West 324.09 feet, point on East 243.94 feet; thence South 89°42153" East to a said east line; thence north along said east line to Point of Beginning EXCEPT public right of way; AND ALSO In Section 17, Township 22 North, Range 5 East, Tax Lot #9290; Lot 3 of Kent SPC 78-34 Recording Number 7812200838 of said plat; AND ALSO In Section 20, Township 22 North, Range 5 East, Tax Lotof9034; the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter Ran e 5 the northeast quarter of Section 20, Township 22 North, 9 East, less County road, less the west 60 feet of the south 120 feet; AND ALSO Tract 8 Smiths�R O Orchard Tracts to Kent less road. LID344 U throughLot I 9Benson Crest #3 in Volume 8 3 of93 53 ande54; and Lots 1 and2 of Kings Place n Volume 118 Pagesats AND ALSO In Section 17, Township 22 North, Range 5 East, Tax Lot x903 ; Lot 1 of Kent SPC 78-34 Recording Number 7812200838 saidapler described as follows uartere of the east /southwest quarter southeast23 of the quarter the of the southeast q north 200 feet thereof less County roads; AND ALSO heast corner of the southeast quarter o Beginning at the nort the southwest quarter of Section 17, Township 22 North, Range 5 East; thence south along the east linethence thereof 1 0000feet; thence North 89'37108" West 324.09 feet, point on East 243.94 feet; thence South 89°42153" East to a said east line; thence north along said east line to Point of Beginning EXCEPT public right of way; AND ALSO In Section 17, Township 22 North, Range 5 East, Tax Lot #9290; Lot 3 of Kent SPC 78-34 Recording Number 7812200838 of said plat; AND ALSO In Section 20, Township 22 North, Range 5 East, Tax Lotof9034; the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter Ran e 5 the northeast quarter of Section 20, Township 22 North, 9 East, less County road, less the west 60 feet of the south 120 feet; AND ALSO Tract 8 Smiths�R O Orchard Tracts to Kent less road. LID344 U Kent City Council Meeting Date January 18 1994_ Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: EVERSON ANNEXATION - ORDINANCE 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by City Council, adoption of Ordinance No. 31z)j authorizing the Everson Annexation in the vicinity of 93rd Avenue South & South 222nd Street. 3. EXHIBITS: Public Works Director memorandum, vicinity map and ordinance 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Council Action 1/4194 (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS' 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember DISCUSSION: ACTION: ves, Councilmember econds Council Agenda Item No. 3F DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS DECEMBER 30, 1992 TO: MAYOR & CITY COU�iCIL FROM: DON WICKSTROM RE: EVERSON ANNEXATION This annexation is in the vicinity of 93rd Ave So. and So. 222nd St. On November 16, 1992 the City received a 10% Notice of Intent to annex approximately 60 acres having a total assessed value of $2,590,846.00. A map of the proposed annexation area is attached. Under state law the City must hold a public meeting with the petitioners within 60 days of receipt of the 10% petition. Normally a Committee recommendation would be included herewith, however the last Public Works Committee was cancelled due to snow and with the holidays, a meeting was not rescheduled. With this being the last regularly scheduled Council meeting prior to lapse of the 60 day period, Council action tonight is necessary in order for this annexation to proceed. As noted earlier, the annexation area is approximately 60 acres. It is composed of roughly 28 parcels all zoned single family residential. Its anticipated City zoning would also be single family residential. Its total estimated population is 57. It is physically bisected by Garrison Creek with the westerly .half serviced both by City sewer and water and the easterly half serviced by City sewer and private well systems. There is 1200 linear feet of 2 lane, oil matt County road with about 400 feet thereof in need of overlaying within the first year. The area is presently serviced by Fire District 1#37 for which there would be a loss of Fire District tax revenue upon annexation. A financial breakdown is given on the attached Table. It is the Public Works Department recommendation that the City Council authorize circulation of the 60% petition subject to the City's existing indebtedness. Note: Jim White has expressed his support on this annexation and on this date the other two members of the committee were telephoned however, we were unable to have direct conversation with them. CITY OF KENT FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS-EVERSON FOR THE YEAR 1992 G 11, 881 60 Total acres 8,400 29 Total number of parcels 24 Total number of res. units 6,066 U 57 Total estimated population 39,650 P Total assessed valuation 3,508,127,478 A 2,590,846 Criminal CITYWIDE General CIP Street Justice Storm Dr. Other Fund Total BUDGET Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Revenue: ------------- 6,938 Prop. Tax iJ 3.18622(1) 10,947,540 A 6,938 11,194,747 1,481 Sales Tax 3,988,065 0 1,481 Utility Tax(2) Special Assessments 2,234,133 443 443 Real Estate Excise 600,000 A Gambling Taxes 514,000 97 Business Licenses and Permits(3) 230,746 0 97 400 278,025 P 400 3,677 Grants 2,557,795 P 2,060 1,403 214 733 State Shared Revenue T33 Local Sales Tax Criminal Justice 509,589 P 120 120 Fire Insurance Premium Tax 83,700 P 64 64 Drug Task Force Revenue 44,594 P (2,996) Fire Protection District # 37(4) 2,302,924 0 (2,996) Jail Intergovernmental Revenue 825,485 390 King County Medical Service Levy 527,540 A 390 419419 Fines and Forfeitures 566,759 A Parks 1,563,916 P 735 Miscellaneous Fees(5) 892,453 0 735 Interest Income 4,314,301 Water Utility 7,605,768 Sewer Utility 7,215,986 818 818 Drainage Utility(6) 3,242,563 U 547 547 Street Utility aa1.90/M U Golf 2,741,874 64,982,503 9,524 443 1,950 1,011 818 120 13,866 Estimated Total Revenue Expenditures: 2,444 General Government(7) 5,543,538 0 2,444 1,011 3,670 Police(8) 8,558,635 0 2,659 Fire 10,157,327 4,380 Public Works-Street(9) 4,114,207 A 4,380 Leisure Services 7,166,342 2,759 Health and Human Services 1,918,909 P 2,759 Debt Service 10,862,956 Water Utility 5,605,802 Sewer Utility 6,242,453 327 818 1,145 Drainage Utility(6) 5,616,856 0 Estimated Total Expenditures 65,787,025 7,862 4,380 327 1,011 818 0 14,398 1,663 (3,937) 1,623 (0) 0 120 (531) Net Impact Income (Loss) G (6) DRAINAGE UTILITY: Drainage Basin "I" monthly charge 2.84 X 12 months = 34.08 X 24 developed parcels = 818 Drainage Revenue (7) GENERAL GOVERNMENT: General Government expenses not expected to be as much using a ratio of annexation estimated population to ' the city total papulation, times the General Expenses. This is because some services are not expected to be needed. General Government 5,543,538 Police 8,558,635 Public Works -Street 4,114,207 Health and Human Services 1,918,909 Modified Expenditures 20,174,939 Modified Expenditures 20,174,939_= 57 Everson Est. Pop. 30.67/. Modification Ratio X Total City Expenses 65,787,025 ------ X 5,543,538 = 2,444 39,650 City Pop. (8) Preliminary estimate of $7,339 was based on a city average of cost per person. The City of Kent average cost for police protection is increased greatly because of its large industrial base and it costs more to process a call from a industrial taxpayer than a call from a residential taxpayer. Since Everson annexation is primarily residential an optional is warranted. Annual cost of service: a. 23 Single Family Homes X 126.54 Per Dwelling = 2,910 b. 1 Mobile Home X 126.54 Per Dwelling = 127 c. 5 Vacant Lots * X 126.54 Per Duelling = 632 * (when built out) 3,670 (9) Based upon Public Works field inspection there would be a $3,500 intial cost. Field inspection also indicates that the area would need some additional work in approximately 5 years at a cost of $4,400 with $880 reserved each year to cover these costs. CITY OF KENT, 'S TO EVERSON ANNEXATION THE YEAR 1992 (1) PROPERTY TAXES: City Regular Levy Excess Levy 2.67776 X 2,590,846Assessed Valuation 0.50846 ----------- ---- — ---"' = 6,938 General Fund revenue ------------- 1000 3.18622 (2) UTILITY TAXES: Estimated Average Yearly Residential Utility Bill; ELectricaL/Natural Gas 924 Telephone 186 Water 189 Sewer 230 Drainage -Basin 1 34 ------------- Rate Subtotal 1,563 X 3.50% = 54.70 Garbage 108 X 6.50% = 7.02 -------------- Total For Year 1,671 61.72 X 24 Res. Units= 1,481- (3) BUSINESS LICENSE: Estimated Population 57 ______________X 2692 Total Licenses = 3.86 Additional Licenses Total Population 39,650 X 25.00 Business in Heme License 96.50 (4) FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT #37: Assessed Valuation 2,590,846 = 2,591 X 1.28471 County Rate = 1000 (5) MISCELLANEOUS FEES: Planning, Engineering miscellaneous fees 783,154 General Government miscellaneous fees 109,299 ------------ 892,453 3,328 X .90 City Portion 2,996 Loss to City Assessed Valuation 2,590,846 ______________X 783,154 = 578 Planning, Engineering miscellaneous fees City Assessed Valuation 3,508,127,478 Estimated Population --- 57 "X 109,299 = 157 General Government miscclleous fees General Government Total Population 39,650 735 Total miscellecus fees ------------- PROPERTY LINES SHOWN ARE APPRO%DLATE E%ISMG CITY LIK CONTOUR INTERVAL= 5 FT. PROPOSED EVERSON ANNEXATION i' I� ORDINANCE NO. i II AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of f the City of Kent, Washington, annexing to the city certain lands contiguous thereto, in the vicinity 'I of South 222nd Street and 93rd Avenue South, commonly known as the Everson Annexation. n WHEREAS, on or about November 16, 1992, the owners of not less than ten percent in value, according to the assessed valuation for general taxation of a certain area of property for which annexation was sought, more commonly known as the "Everson Annexation" area, which is legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, notified the Kent City Council in writing of their intent to commence annexation proceedings; and WHEREAS, on or about January 5, 1993, the Kent City Council accepted the initiating parties notice of intent to annex the "Everson Annexation" area; and WHEREAS, on or about May 7, 1993, the owners of not less than sixty percent in value, according to the assessed valuation for general taxation of the Everson Annexation area, filed a petition for annexation of the Everson Annexation area to the City of Kent; and WHEREAS, the aforementioned sixty percent petition was found to be proper and legally sufficient in all respects; and WHEREAS, on or about August 20, 1993, the City of Kent finalized its State Environmental Policy"SEPA" Act ( ) process and issued a Determination of Non -Significance ("DNS") regarding the 'y proposed Everson Annexation; and WHEREAS, on or about November 12, 1993, the Washingtor I for King County approved the proposed State Boundary Review Board ;l Everson Annexation; and !I!! WHEREAS, the City published and posted notice of a lipublic hearing on the Everson Annexation in accordance with RCW 35A.14.130 so that interested persons could voice their app roval or disapproval of the annexation; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Kent held the ,public hearing on the Everson Annexation in the City Council Chambers at a regularly scheduled meeting of the Kent City Council at 7:00 pm on January 4, 1994; and WHEREAS, it appears to the City of Kent that the Everson Annexation meets all requirements specified by law, to and including consideration of the passage of this ordinance, and that the land to be annexed is contiguous to the City of Kent anr' has not heretofore been incorporated in or as a city or town; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That there shall be annexed to the City i of Kent, Washington certain property situated in King County, I Washington, which property is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, and having boundaries as outlined in the map attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated by this reference. I! Section 2_ That, in accordance with the Everson Annexation property owner's petition, the property hereby annexe shall be assessed and taxed at the same rate and on the same basis as other property within the City of Kent is assessed and edness of the City taxed to pay for any outstanding general indebt to which the area was annexed and which indebtedness has been approved by the voters, contracted for, or incurred prior to, or existing at the effective date of this annexation. i Section 3. The property annexed shall be subject to the City of Kent's existing zoning regulations, specifically those regulations that apply to newly annexed territory as set forth in Kent City Code Sections 15.03.020(E) and 15.09.055. Section 4. The annexation of the annexed property will become effective upon the effective date of this Ordinance, and the area shall become a part of the City of Kent, subject to all the laws and ordinances of the City then and thereafter in effect except as otherwise provided by law. .. Section 5. Within thirty (30) days from the passage, approval and publication of this Ordinance as provided by law, the City Clerk of the City of Kent shall, under the direction of the Mayor of the City of Kent, determine the resident population of the annexed territory, which population determination shall consist of an actual enumeration of the population which shall be made in accordance with the practices and policies and subject to approval of the Planning and Community Affairs Agency of the State of Washington and which population shall be determined as of the effective date of annexation as specified in this Ordinance. 1 Section 6. The City Clerk of the City of Kent, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.700, shall prepare a certificate signed by the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk in such form and containing such information as shall be prescribed by the Office of Financial Management of the State of Washington, and the City Clerk shall thereafter submit said certificate in triplicate to the Office of Financial Management of the State of Washington, along with the population determination of the annexed territory. i Section 7. Upon passage of this annexation I ordinance, the City Clerk of the City of Kent, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.140, shall send to the Office of the Clerk of the County Council a certified copy of this ordinance together with a copy of a letter from the Executive Secretary of the King County Boundary Review Board which letter contains a copy of the decision of the Boundary Review Board relating to this '!annexation. Section 8. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance. Section 9. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law. JIM WHITE, MAYOR ATTEST: I BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: ROGER A. LUBOVICH, CITY ATTORNEY PASSED _ APPROVED PUBLISHED day of day of day of 1994. 1994. . 1994. I � I hereby certify that this is a true copy of ordinance iNo. passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the City of Kent as :hereon indicated. BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK EVERSANX.pIn (SEAL) /3 /-7 THE LAND SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 22N, RANGE 5E DEFINED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SW CORNER OF SAID S.1/2 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 22N, RANGE 5E, BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIBED, THENCE NORTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION WHICH LINE IS ASLO DEFINED WITHIN CITY OF KENT ORDINANCE #1006 TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE THEREOF, WHICH LINE IS ALSO DEFINED WITHIN CITY OF KENT ORDINANCE #1986, TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST MARGIN OF 93RD AVENUE SOUTH; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST MARGIN WHICH MARGIN IS ALSO DEFINED WITHIN CITY OF KENT ORDINANCE #1986 TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH MARGIN OF SOUTH 222ND STREET; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID NORTH MARGIN WHICH SAID NORTH MARGIN IS ALSO DEFINED WITHIN CITY OF KENT #1986 TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 7; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE EAST LINE THEREOF, WHICH LINE IS DEFINED WITHIN CITY OF KENT ORDINANCE #1986 TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER THEREOF THENCE EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE S 1/2 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SAID SECTION WHICH NORTH LINE IS DEFINED WITHIN CITY OF KENT ORDINANCE #2611 TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF W 1/2 OF NW 1/4 OF SE 1/4 OF SE 1/4 IN SAID SECTION; THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE EAST LINE THEREOF TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH MARGIN OF SOUTH 222ND STREET; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH MARGIN A DISTANCE OF 13 FEET; THENCE SOUTH PARALLEL WITH AND 13 FEET WEST OF THE EAST LINE OF THE W 1/2 OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SAID SECTION, TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION, THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXHIBIT= I •�- � I I ------------ WNEXAT $ / Ilk it -JM � II- _ PROPOSED EVERSON ANNEXATION- VICINITY MAP EXHIBIT 5 Kent City Council Meeting Date January 18, 1994 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: SEGREGATION REQUEST - LID 320 t I 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by he Public Works Committee, adoption of Resolution No. authorizing the segregation of Assessment #17 in LID 320. The property is being divided into three separate parcels, thereby each parcel would pay it's equal share of the assessment. 3. EXHIBITS: Public Works minutes, Public Works Director memorandum, vicinity map, resolution 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES FISCALIPERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 3G DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS JANUARY 5, 1994 TO: PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE FROM: DON WICKSTROM(f RE: SEGREGATION REQUEST - LID 320 The Department of Public Works has received a request from Gerald Schneider of Schneider Homes to segregate Assessment #17 of LID 320. This LID is the James Street Improvement project from West Valley Highway to Russell Road. The property is being divided into three separate parcels thereby each one paying its equal share of the assessment. ACTION Recommend Council adopt Resolution #, segregation of Assessment #17 in LID 320. for CITY Of YfK >i L'V IV Dan Kelleher, Mayor Don E. Wickslrorn, P.E., Director of Public Works The City of Kent Celebrates Its First 100 Years 14AIL TO: PROPERTY MANAGEMENT CITY OF KENT ENGINEERING DEPT 220 4TH AVENUE SOUTH KENT, WASHINGTON 98031 ATT11: JERRY MCCAUGHAN SEGREGATION APPLICA'['ION 1. Legal Description of property to be segregated, together with - an attached map of a scale o[ not less than l"'=100'. 0 2. Sauare footage of Area to be segregated (/PHalE -� �� 71S 19 3. Local Improvements District f Assessment ,r /7 4. Attached money order, check (no cash) in the amount of $40.00 made payable to the city of Kent. (Minimum Fee) 5. Name and address of o'.mer or incoming Oaner of parcel to be segregated. ('Phis name shall be same as / undersigned) �C•1/C% lvl�l 9h��,� 1 G. The undersigned agrees to pay all charges in accordance with the City Of Kent Ordinance and RCW 35:44.410. ($40.00/hr. less application fee) Applicant _ T1893 pY 220+m AVE. SO.. I KENT, WASI UNG rON 90012 55951 ENGINE EIING 1205)059 3381 1 OPEIlATIONS 1.'061115931951 I'AX , 0593334 .N `J I 1 Wil/ .00'60, s or,rk.00 N RI N _ fco cc LL_a, I I' ��. W� �� � ✓..: �✓iii �,� ;' –�L � l ° o O n O zo6 z 3 „� O SZ8£Z W J" 2 J" F �W - , II � � ��+•I Q� t9C41 �� I � QIC9 1 I„��ra. �rI (� I I _1 L1m j F� Q ;n1�.00zs 'cc Iz 0 _ In � Q -I°I V/ � ? © m ® ® I I ^ OQ.CC Z' w y /� • x � I ' ¢ If ® � I .ao u Q � i / /�Q ...00 a _ I � f'a. `: '"�j J� (� ., 1 C., , o J I 1 aA s V Er�Z9 ,HAV �77�9 c u NJ- Ire Q y' z , _. ',i li I , r-�-- _. � 1p IU'. �- �1 I I�� ✓ 4 U'/ �Ic r� '^ UI�j —Q ®I L� �� Q �I ^ '^Ic .-. I .L— Lcoo Za l m, 9 J I G”" ' _� (� '.. crllci 1?crl —� _ b I_Zi crl !I. OC ca cc 1 ` >06CZ 0 $ j < Is a V 'rr199 bg i .94899 - �� 3 ,00.61.00 N c I Brubaker said that less than a year ago, we entered into a lengthy contract to lock in service until the year 2001 and now Rabanco is asking for a 21% increase in rates within one year. Brubaker recommended that by the next committee meeting we come back with some sort of compromise, solution and/or a recommendation to go to an audit. Caputo stated that they have used every avenue that the contract has given them and as it gets more and more delayed they would expect to be able to retroactive an increase. Committee recommended that staff review the rate increase issue and bring it back to committee. Segregation Request - LID 320 Wickstrom stated that this was a James Street LID and the segregation request was made by Schneider Homes, on the north side of James Street, west of West Valley Highway. Wickstrom requested approval of the segregation. Committee unanimously recommended approval of the segregation request. Sale of Surplus Vehicles Wickstrom referred to the list of vehicles that were submitted for surplus. Jack Spencer stated that we have 18 pieces of equipment and they all have high mileage or are in need of major repair. McCarthy said that we are getting a new Senior Center van in the 194 budget. He asked if the vans in the list are no longer useable. Spencer said that these were the vans that the Senior Center did have and he would like to keep the better of the two as a back-up. Committee unanimously recommended declaring this equipment as surplus and authorize the sale thereof at the next state auction, with the exception of one van to be used as back-up. Signal at Reiten & Jason Wickstrom said we received six bids and one was received thru FAX which turned out to be the low bid. He said there is $1000 difference between the low bid and the second bid; however because of some improprieties in the FAX bid, the second bidder would possibly sue us. He said that -legally awarding the bid to the low bidder is defensible however, a great deal of staff time would be involved in a suit for a $1000 differential. Wickstrom said that the Public Works Dept. is recommending that the six bids be rejected, and the project be re -bid. Committee unanimously recommended rejection of all bids. 9 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, directing the Finance Director to segregate an assessment levied under L.I.D. 320. WHEREAS, on April 7, 1986, through its Ordinance No. 2624, the City established assessment number 17 of Local Improvement District 320 ("LID 320") in the amount of $90,563.00; and WHEREAS, Gerald E. Schneider, the owner of record of the property affected by assessment number 17, has requested segregation of assessment number 17; and WHEREAS, all clerical and engineering fees have been paid for the segregation as required by law, and the application being in all respects proper; NOW, THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The original tract of assessment number 17 of LID 320, which is described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, shall be segregated into three separate parcels, all in accordance with the application of Gerald E. Schneider. Section 2. The legal descriptions of the three segregated Parcels are attached as Exhibits B, C, and D, which descriptions are attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 1 Section 3. The new assessment amount for the tract describe in Exhibit B shall be $36,481.97; the new assessment amount for the tract described in Exhibit C shall be $7,356.43; and the new assessment amount for the tract described in Exhibit D shall be $4,839.22. Section 4. The Finance Director is hereby authorized and directed to segregate assessment number 17 according to the terms stated herein. Passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the city of Kent, Washington this day of , 1994. Concurred in by the Mayor of the City of Kent, Washington, this day of , 1994. JIM WHITE, MAYOR ATTEST: BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: ROGER A. LUBOVICH, CITY ATTORNEY LID320SG.pwk 2 EXHIBIT A A portion of Tract 7 of Meeker's Supplemental First Addition to Kent, less the East 1 acre of the North 4 acres, less the street. EXHIBIT A 3 VILLAGE ON JAMES STREET PHASE I LEGAL DESCRIPTION That portion of Block 7 Meeker s Supplemental Plat of the First Addition to the Town of Kent, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Volume 5 of Plats, pages 96 and 96-1/2, records of King County, Washington; EXCEPT that portion thereof conveyed for Morton Street (S. 238th St.); and EXCEPT that portion thereof conveyed for James Street; being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the southeast comer of the hereinbefore described. parcel; thence North 88059'39" West, along the north margin of James Street a distance of 345.35 feet; thence North 00049'00" East a distance of 111.00 feet, thence South 88059'39" East a distance of 61.00 feet; thence North 00054'40" East a distance of 5928 feet; thence North 45049'00" East a distance of 23.90 feet; thence South 89000'30" East a distance of 138.50 feet; thence North 00049'00" East of 12000 feet; thence South 89000'30" East a distance of 128.50 feet to the east line of the hereinbefore described Block 7; East line, a distance of 307.30 feet to the North thence South 00045'10" West, along said margin of James Street and the point of beginning. TOGETHER WITH: That portion of Block 7, Meeker's supplemental Plat of the First Addition to the Town of Kent, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Volume 5 of Plats, pages 96 and 96-1/2, records of King County, Washington, EXCEPT that portion thereof conveyed for Morton Street (S. 238th St.); and EXCEPT that portion thereof conveyed for James Street; being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast corner of the hereinbefore described parcel; thence North 88059'39" West, along the north margin of James Street, a distance of 345.35 feet to the true point of beginning; thence continuing North 88059'39" West along said north margin. a distance of 238.00 feet to the west line of the hereinbefore described Block 7, thence North 00049'00" East, along said west line, a distance of 129.70 feet; thence South 89011'00" East a distance of 125.45 feet; thence North 00049'00" East a distance of 55.47 feet; thence South 89000'30" East a distance of 140.56 feet; thence North 00049'00" East a distance of 105.27 feet; thence South 89000'30" East a distance of 100.00 feet; thence South 00049'00" West a distance of 103.68 feet;;( thence South 45049'00" West a distance of 23.90 feet; thence South 00054'40" West a distance of 59.28 feet; thence North 88059'39" West a distance of 61.00 feet; thence south 00049'00" West a distance of 111.00 feet to the north margin of James Street and the true point of beginning. EXHIBIT 13 VILLAGE ON JAMES STREET PHASE II LEGAL DESCRIPTION That portion of Block 7, Meeker's Supplemental Plat of the First Addition to the Town of Kent, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Volume 5 of Plats, pages 96 and 96 1/2, records of King County, Washington; EXCEPT that portion thereof conveyed for Morton Street (S. 238th St.); and EXCEPT that portion thereof conveyed for James Street; being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the southeast comer of the hereinbefore described parcel; thence North 00045'10" East, along the east line of said Block 7, a distance of 462.65 feet to the true point of beginning; thence North 89014'50" West a distance of 53.90 feet; thence North 44005'58" West a distance of 20.97 feet; is thence North 89000'56" West a distance of248.13 feet; thence North 68057'00" West a distance of 34.68 feet; thence North 00058'38" East a distance of 99.90 feet to the south margin of Morton Street (S. 238th St.); thence South 89001'22" East, along said south margin, a distance of 348.95 feet to the east line of the hereinbefore described Block 7; thence South 00045'10" West, along said east line, a distance of I26.43 feet to the true point of beginning. TOGETHER WITH: That portion of Block 7, Meeker's Supplemental Plat of the First Addition to the Town of Kent, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Volume 5 of Plats, pages 96 and 96 1/2, records of King County, Washingtn; EXCEPT that portion thereof conveyed for Morton Street (S. 238th St.); and EXCEPT that portion thereof conveyed for James Street; being more particularly described as follows: Commending at the southeast corner of the hereinbefore described parcel; thence North 00045'10" East, along the east line of said Block 7, a distance of 307.30 feet to the true point of beginning; thence North 89000'30" West a distance of 128.50 feet, thence North 00049'00" East a distance of 85.22 feet; thence North 89000'30" West a distance of 188.50 feet; thence North 00049'00" East a distance of 84.68 feet; thence South 89000'56" East a distance of 248.13 feet; thence South 44005'53" East a distance of 20.97 feet; thence South 89014'50" East a distance of 53.90 feet to the east line of the hereinbefore described Block 7; thence South 00045'10" West, along said east line, a distance of 155.35 feet to the true point of beginning. EXHIBIT G Page - 1 VILLAGE ON 'JAMES STREET PHASE II LEGAL DESCRIPTION (Continued) TOGETHER WITH: That portion of Block 7, Meeker's Supplemental Plat of the First Addition to the Town of Kent, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Volume 5 of Plats, pages 96 and 96 1/2, records of King County, Washington; EXCEPT that portion thereof conveyed for Morton Street (S. 238th St.); and EXCEPT that portion thereof conveyed for James Street; being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the southeast corner of the hereinbefore described parcel; thence North 00045'10" East, along the east line of said Block 7, a distance of 307.30 feet; thence North 89000'30" West a distance of 128.50 feet to the true point of beginning; thence South 00049'00" West a distance of 120.00 feet, thence North 89000'30" West a distance of 138.50 feet, thence North 00049'00" East a distance of 103.68 feet, thence North 89000'30" West distance of 50.00 feet, thence North 00049'00" East a distance of 101.54 feet; thence South 89000'30" East a distance of 188.50 feet; thence South 00049'00" West a distance of 85.22 feet to the true Point of Beginning. EXHIr-I'T C - Page - 2 VILLAGE ON JAMES STREET PHASE III LEGAL DESCRIPTION That portion of Block 7, Meeker's Supplemental Plat of the First Addition to the Town of Kent, according to the Plat thereof -recorded in Volume 5 of Plats, pages 96 and 96 112, records of King County, Washington; EXCEPT that portion thereof conveyed for Morton Street (S. 238th St.); and EXCEPT that portion thereof conveyed for James Street; being more particularly described as follows: Commending at the southeast corner of the hereinbefore described parcel; thence North 83059'39" West along the north margin of James Street a distance of 633.35 feet to the west line of said Block 7; thence North 00049'00" East, along said line, a distance of 453.50 feet to the true point of beginning; thence continuing North 00049'00" East, a distance of 135.26 feet to the south margin of Morton Street (S. 238th St.); thence South 89001'22" East, along said south margin a distance of 283.74 feet; thence South 00058'38" West a distance of 99.90 feet; thence South 68057'00" East a distance of 34.68 feet; thence North 89000'56" West a distance of 248.09 feet, thence South 45054'15" West a distance of 33.00 feet; thence North 89011'00" West a distance of 44.53 feet to the west line of the hereinbefore described Block 7 and the true point of beginning TOGETHER WITH: That portion of Block 7, Meekees Supplemental Plat of the First Addition to the Town of Kent, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Volume 5 of Plats, pages 96 and 96 112, records of King County, Washington; EXCEPT that portion thereof conveyed for Morton Street (S. 238th St.); and EXCEPT that portion thereof conveyed for James Street; being more particulariy described as follows: Commencing a6t the southeast corner of the hereinbefore described parcel; thence North 88059'39" West, along the north margin of James Street, a distance of 633.35 feet to the west line of said Block 7; thence North 00049'00" East, along said west line, a distance of 231.95 feet to the true point of beginning; thence continuing North 00049'00" East a distance of 171.55 feet; thence South 89011'00" East a distance of 44.53 feet; thence North 45054'15" East a distance of 33.00 feet; thence South 89000'56" East a distance of 248.09 feet; thence South 00049'00" West a distance of 84.68 feet; thence North 89000'30" West a distance of 192.07 feet; thence South 00059'30" West a distance of 110.41 feet; thence North 89000'30" West a distance of 123.59 feet to the west line of the hereinbefore described Block 7 and the true point of be inning. ECH I BIT Pnge - 1 VILLAGE ON JAMES STREET PHASE III LEGAL DESCRIPTION (Continued) TOGETHER WTPHt That portion of Block 71 Meeker's Supplemental Plat of the First Addition to the Town of Kent, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Volume 5 of Plats, pages 96 and 96 1/2, records of King County, Washington; EXCEPT that portion thereof conveyed for Morton Street (S. 238th St.); and EXCEPT that portion thereof conveyed for James Street being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the southeast corner of the hereinbefore described parcel; thence North 88059'39" West, along the north margin of James Street, a distance of 633.35 feet to the west line of said Block 7; thence North 00049'00" East, along said west line a distance of 129.70 feet to the true point of beginning; thence continuing North 00049'00" East a distance of 152.25 feet; thence South 89000'30" East a distance of 123.59 feet; thence North 00059'30" East a distance of 110.41 feet; thence South 89000'30" East a distance of 192.07 feet, thence South 00°49'00" West a distance of 101.54 feet, thence North 89000'30" West a distance of 50.00 feet; thence South 00049'00" West a distance of 105.27 feet; thence North 89000'30" West a distance of 140.56 feet; thence South 00049'00" West a distance of 55.47 feet; thence North 89011'00" West a distance of 25.45 feet to the west line of the hereinbefore described Block 7 and the true point of beginning. EXHIBIT= Page - 2 CITY OF MIT Dan Kelleher, Mayor Don E. Wickstrom, P.E., Director of Public Works The City of Kent Celebrates Its First 100 Years MAIL TO: PROPERTY MANAGEMENT CITY OF KENT ENGINEERING DEPT 220 4TH AVENUE SOUTH _. KENT, WASHINGTON 98031 ATTII: JERRY 11CCAUGHAN SEGREGATION APPLICA'T'ION L Legal Description of property to be segregated, together with an attached map of a scale of not less than 111 = 1001. 2. Square footage of Area to be segregated 3. Local Improvements District 2 7L -'o Assessment ,; 17 4. Attached money order, check (no cash) in the amount of $40.00 made payable to the City of Kent. (Minimum Fee) 5. Name and address of owner or incoming owner of parcel to be segregated. �ZF��l�C�C �Q/74F/✓c 4' (This name shall be same as undersigned) 6. The undersigned agrees to pay all charges in accordance with the City of Kent Ordinance and RCW 35.44.410. ($40.00/hr. less application fee) Applicant T1893 11 `qtr 220 4m AVE. 50., I KENT, WASHINGTON 980325895 r ENGINEERING 1206)8593383 'OPERATIONS 120618 5 9 33951 FA%Y 8593334 �U - _ " N C 0111 J M1M1 I .0069 90 &E.60= J ] �• I J. J-�� I ao ccl - / O S cn I I SZ84Z- I` OIC WiGo zs® w -~J 1• Qr' `I 4. I �+^ r O l0 �l O - ® I U\00 z - `r✓ �I �� FF --ii U �l i� © M I � ro � � '� \I 0.�. � w � � I Ul 'I rr W .00 LS _ —I oI ( W z .0025 J _ It CL�F �-� r n I 3AV uaL9 91 N u�L9 -/ - - ,S '3AV ' r O ' �•I j � rD ooz;Ql i U {I � ( � I � oa zs iv m � �•--� � (�. ® n -_.� �� _.--�M� i t.L;-^i- L�-1��1�—�'�•M`'M1"i{ I�� �,__ _ Qaa tt � I - W �Or .oa ci to � o� . _! vo6vi 00 7Av�:u�ss I i I Kent City Council Meeting Date January 18, 1994 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: SALE OF SURPLUS VEHICLES 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by Public Works Committee, authorization to declare 18 pieces of equipment as surplus and to sell them at the next State auction. All of these vehicles have either high mileage or are in need of extensive repair. 3. EXHIBITS: Public Works Director memorandum and Public Works minutes 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended i 7. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember, DISCUSSION: ACTION: s, Councilmember seconds Council Agenda Item No. 3H DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS JANUARY 5, 1994 TO: PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE FROM: DON WICKSTROM W RE: SALE OF SURPLUS VEHICLES The enclosed list of Equipment Rental vehicles have been replaced with new units and are no longer needed. ACTION: Declare this equipment as surplus and authorize the sale thereof at the next State auction. MEMORANDUM DATE: December 15th, 1993 TO: Don Wickstrom, Public Works Director FROM: Jack Spencer, Fleet Mang THRU: Tim Heydon, Operations M:: g 2N SUBJECT: Authorization to Surplus Vehicles eplaced and not Needed I am requesting authorization to surplus Equipment Rental vehicles that have been replaced with new units and are no longer needed by the City. All of these vehicles have either high mileage or are in a condition where they will need extensive repair. License #. Mileage 05748D 355 1990 Chevrolet Caprice - Police 94848 Has high mileage & replaced w/another unit 08742D 354 1990 Chevrolet Caprice - Police 93675 Has high mileage & replaced w/new car 01843D 376 1987 Chevrolet - Ex -Police car 89816 Replaced & kept as spare. Obsolete equipment, not useable for Police work. 08786D 350 1990 Chevrolet Caprice - Police 98274 High mileage & replaced w/new car D336H 702 1982 Dodge Diplomat - Fire Dept Fire Sup 66344 Replaced in 1992 & used as line vehicle. Appearance and condition is poor. It is no longer needed, and should be sold as surplus. 02826D 390 1986 Ford LTD II - Police Dept Admin 76718 Used by Gambling, replaced w/new vehicle. Needs engine repair, appearance rough. D12427 755 1982 Dodge Diplomat - Fire Dept Code Enforcement 84471 Fairly high mileage, 12 years old Replaced & used as line vehicle. No longer needed. D33702 320 1984 Ford LTD II Police Corrections 48556 Vehicle has engine problems. Would need extensive repair. Deadlined replaced w/line vehicle. JS/map B:ER024 1981 Dodge Pickup 1/2 T-Finance/Customer Services 90480 D19936 045 Was used by meter readers until replaced in 1987. Line vehicle until 1993. Mileage, condition, poor appearance. Should be surplused. D171134 745 1979 GMC Rally Van - Fire Dept transmission 76798 14 years old. Will need engine and need painting and interior repairs. Also, would Vehicle has been replaced in 1988 and is. repair. no longer needed. 93076 01869D 322 1987 Chevrolet Sport Van for a prisoner van, it has high Used by Corrections mileage and has been replaced with a new van. 81913 D35039 66 1985 Dodge 350 Passenger Van Center. Replaced in 1990 with a new Used by Senior unit, has been used as a line vehicle for rental to all departments. 103981 01866D 265 1987 Dodge 350 Maxi Wagon a new van used by Senior Center, Replaced in 1993 with has extreme high mileage. 41 1981 150 Cargo Van used by Engineering until 1988, 76154 D20928 Has been used as a loaner and line vehicle. It is no longer needed. 06222C 377 1989 Chevrolet Caprice Police car replaced with a new 95760 Has high mileage and has been vehicle. 05728D 89669 371 1989 Chevrolet Caprice Police car been replaced with a new unit. Has high mileage and has Transmission is starting to slip. 08747D 352 1990 Chevrolet Caprice Police Car vehicle 91976 Has high mileage and has been wrecked, Replaced with a new unit. unable to be repaired. 09611D 361 1991 Chevrolet Caprice Police car accident and is beyond 49937 Unit involved in a serious Police car. This unit will be repair for use as a sold for salvage. JS/map B:ER024 Brubaker said that less than a year ago, we entered into a lengthy contract to lock in service until the year 2001 and now Rabanco is asking for a 21% increase in rates within one year. Brubaker recommended that by the next committee meeting we come back with some sort of compromise, solution and/or a recommendation to go to an audit. Caputo stated that they have used every avenue that the contract has given them and as it gets more and more delayed they would expect to be able to retroactive an increase. Committee recommended that staff review the rate increase issue and bring it back to committee. Segregation Request - LID 320 Wickstrom stated that this was a James Street LID and the segregation request was made by Schneider Homes, on the north side of James Street, west of West Valley Highway. Wickstrom requested approval of the segregation. Committee unanimously recommended approval of the segregation request. Sale of Surplus Vehicles Wickstrom referred to the list of vehicles that were submitted for - surplus. Jack Spencer stated that we have 18 pieces ofequipment and they all have high mileage or are in need of major repair. McCarthy said that we are getting a new Senior Center van in the 194 budget. He asked if the vans in the list are no longer useable. Spencer said that these were the vans that the Senior Center did have and he would like to keep the better of the two as a back-up. Committee unanimously recommended declaring this equipment as surplus and authorize the sale thereof at the next state auction, with the exception of one van to be used as back-up. Signal at Reiten & Jason Wickstrom said we received six bids and one was received thru FAX which turned out to be the low bid. He said there is $1000 difference between the low bid and the second bid; however because of some improprieties in the FAX bid, the second bidder would possibly sue us. He said that legally awarding the bid to the low bidder is defensible however, a great deal of staff time would be involved in a suit for a $1000 differential. Wickstrom said that the Public Works Dept. is recommending that the six bids be rejected, and the project be re -bid. Committee unanimously recommended rejection of all bids. 3 Kent City Council Meeting Date January 18 1994 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: MILL CREEK CANYON EROSION - ACCEPTANCE z. SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works Committee, authorization to accept as complete the contract with Golf Landscaping, Inc. for the Mill Creek Canyon Erosion project, and release of retainage after receipt of State releases. 3. EXHIBITS: Public Works Director memorandum, Public Works minutes and vicinity map 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 3I DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS JANUARY 5, 1994 TO: PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE FROM: DON WICKSTROM RE: MILL CREEK CANYON EROSION - ACCEPT AS COMPLETE This project consisted of concrete dam removal and stream bank repair and other related work within Mill Creek. Because of the combination of limited time constraints (Fisheries permit) and an estimated project cost below the $35,000 bid requirement, the Public Works Dept. sought bids from various contractors and subsequently awarded the work to Golf Landscaping, Inc. for a bid amount of $34,991.88. The final construction cost is $39,515.83 for which the additions relate primarily to the need to use more material than originally estimated. ACTION: Recommend project be accepted as complete. Z r 39 3AV H1Y01 I V7 N r r 3S 3AV OMEOI a 3S 3AY Y I It ' ONZOI Bj70DIJJDg' 2� - J 1 _ WQ w �WI Z r 39 3AV H1Y01 I V7 N JV yb w nlOOi • ^" W W � L 3S 3AV K H10 -OI CO •r ■ 3s 3AV HJ001 ci p i O O r S : p� ry r S 3" H166 9IN rI.�G�• �•! � � � f yzf3�IY�"!1]A6 + ANN MYo S S 3AY H196 F N •y '3-�'��: ', 3► a r • y or 0�'►3...7•y.>. ' .7, O' �� S N ♦ N N H11 -_N rI y 'Jai117 \l.v , T�3 1(. '• y=� N �.N )•YVO. �' ,� AYE S . 3AV ,��� 7•.i; %?•: el . , ; .•.. atti,t Ar7,• t!19 s - S 3AY H1916 HI96 t0 q 4� ��-�'t� %•7• ; �t� °� i .N+ id HisO` is a 3AV HIY6 - '),•,��' ;'`J^� 3AV rn c H116 n a - f � -r O WO� n y g4. -1 \Z�,•�y�� �'b 38wIS S � I yy= 3nr OOOM3ldvw S S ld ONZ6 O W HW 2 f���\' 7)::)A�j to I- r p ♦ ON N3113a 5�0 N 3AYWwig O W j I. ~ • _�•,, W ld r r ld < "+ U i� 3AV dolnim <7wwns ate. 3 7 M31A sn13 s 3 a ' O3A< v 3 t 3AY ~ 1 ` Y OMOAIv a ci c „ ,: X W r 3 3 3AV ,e b, �, .>.'' • �� p O d' i ari w V 5 W m Nl 0131! vo S N dJ W r x /d a m a3Na 3NO S N W W W W I W $ 3AV W 1 3AY IS3M0 W S ld Rp 3"3ZYH N < • W y�' °'� M30 Yx31Vm avw -+3 3Ar raON31 a W"_���. ov h O - d ` 3AY SOMd N 3 \ �'Yr .%, O 3AY a31NV ONYA_ S 0 d r . •i{,�h'ja, ` r W W WIy Of K, h 3AY W NOSYf N �„' 1 �>,• ` S NYjp00 3AY NOlONI N3r W V W ~bW S S� '^ = F JEAN '=w 3AY 0 3AY rano N ZWV W2�W �� 30 MUDI mss CD Y KENNEBEC r O 3AY IS340111H -(M M N p��'•'�'{�� T._�,' S AY OMOJOOOM N N = r rN Q r r rt AVM OIN30S r ,'n L 1 ,V -11`•'. W ~ JJc 5 rn T3 to °A 3AY N N 1Y/.__moi C 3AY Q IC =2VZ> -' °7 u3AY 31V1S N 31 S S SCENa< :t! W VISN WCIro i WAY �3 O Y-) W iv Y W r• 3AV WHIN 30 S W W via b C J N M 3AY 1Va1N30 N a O i t0 W �r s w W 61 �N - 3AV O S3001MB S r 3AY i OVOMIIVM S OYOaIIYw N 3AY IST y7 N u +,l 3AY if I -- ^ V r1Si 3AV r S t0 •(. - ;AY • if if 3AV 1 r y - r a y - an �-• � an to 3AY ONL 7 N =� ONZ N ; 3AY r ONZ r ,: S ,l �a'( ;Q J SIV\ NIV 7�,1 r W y IAV ONE N - vri n w ` ¢< 3AV O ONE S �• C � •„� � * r I N a ' '3/ N 3AY Hit NQ Z a3AV Z W UUI Nlt o S K 3: W %l 1 N N �• W 3AY HIS N K ,Y.t 3AY HIS S J 3AY j, ! HIS S 3AV I - 3AV HIS S 39 H Z Li �Q 4AV l p y _ . ^ - •-- - - NN <RJ H V W It n W E w N FZ 35 3n7 2 YM JV yb w nlOOi • ^" W W � L 3S 3AV K H10 -OI CO •r ■ 3s 3AV HJ001 ci p i O O r S : p� ry r S 3" H166 9IN rI.�G�• �•! � � � f yzf3�IY�"!1]A6 + ANN MYo S S 3AY H196 F N •y '3-�'��: ', 3► a r • y or 0�'►3...7•y.>. ' .7, O' �� S N ♦ N N H11 -_N rI y 'Jai117 \l.v , T�3 1(. '• y=� N �.N )•YVO. �' ,� AYE S . 3AV ,��� 7•.i; %?•: el . , ; .•.. atti,t Ar7,• t!19 s - S 3AY H1916 HI96 t0 q 4� ��-�'t� %•7• ; �t� °� i .N+ id HisO` is a 3AV HIY6 - '),•,��' ;'`J^� 3AV rn c H116 n a - f � -r O WO� n y g4. -1 \Z�,•�y�� �'b 38wIS S � I yy= 3nr OOOM3ldvw S S ld ONZ6 O W HW 2 f���\' 7)::)A�j to I- r p ♦ ON N3113a 5�0 N 3AYWwig O W j I. ~ • _�•,, W ld r r ld < "+ U i� 3AV dolnim <7wwns ate. 3 7 M31A sn13 s 3 a ' O3A< v 3 t 3AY ~ 1 ` Y OMOAIv a ci c „ ,: X W r 3 3 3AV ,e b, �, .>.'' • �� p O d' i ari w V 5 W m Nl 0131! vo S N dJ W r x /d a m a3Na 3NO S N W W W W I W $ 3AV W 1 3AY IS3M0 W S ld Rp 3"3ZYH N < • W y�' °'� M30 Yx31Vm avw -+3 3Ar raON31 a W"_���. ov h O - d ` 3AY SOMd N 3 \ �'Yr .%, O 3AY a31NV ONYA_ S 0 d r . •i{,�h'ja, ` r W W WIy Of K, h 3AY W NOSYf N �„' 1 �>,• ` S NYjp00 3AY NOlONI N3r W V W ~bW S S� '^ = F JEAN '=w 3AY 0 3AY rano N ZWV W2�W �� 30 MUDI mss CD Y KENNEBEC r O 3AY IS340111H -(M M N p��'•'�'{�� T._�,' S AY OMOJOOOM N N = r rN Q r r rt AVM OIN30S r ,'n L 1 ,V -11`•'. W ~ JJc 5 rn T3 to °A 3AY N N 1Y/.__moi C 3AY Q IC =2VZ> -' °7 u3AY 31V1S N 31 S S SCENa< :t! W VISN WCIro i WAY �3 O Y-) W iv Y W r• 3AV WHIN 30 S W W via b C J N M 3AY 1Va1N30 N a O i t0 W �r s w W 61 �N - 3AV O S3001MB S r 3AY i OVOMIIVM S OYOaIIYw N 3AY IST y7 N u +,l 3AY if I -- ^ V r1Si 3AV r S t0 •(. - ;AY • if if 3AV 1 r y - r a y - an �-• � an to 3AY ONL 7 N =� ONZ N ; 3AY r ONZ r ,: S ,l �a'( ;Q J SIV\ NIV 7�,1 r W y IAV ONE N - vri n w ` ¢< 3AV O ONE S �• C � •„� � * r I N a ' '3/ N 3AY Hit NQ Z a3AV Z W UUI Nlt o S K 3: W %l 1 N N �• W 3AY HIS N K ,Y.t 3AY HIS S J 3AY j, ! HIS S 3AV I - 3AV HIS S 39 H Z Li �Q 4AV l p y _ . ^ - •-- - - 0 Mill Creek Canyon Erosion - Acceptance Wickstrom said this was a project Public Works Dept awarded because it was under the bid limits and we were under time constraints to get the erosion control in Mill Creek and we had only a short amount of time to work in the creek due to the fish existing there. Wickstrom said we awarded the contract; it has been completed and the original amount was $34,991.88. He said there were some overruns of the original estimated quantities for dirt and rock which brought the final contract up to $39,500. In response to Johnson, Wickstrom said the additional funds came from the Mill Creek project and there is no problem with the funding. Committee unanimously recommended project be accepted as complete. North 4th Ave Street Rebuild - Acceptance Wickstrom said this was a project that we awarded to Segale to essentially rebuild the south half of N. 4th from 228th to Barnier's property which is half way to 212th St. He said the final contract amount was substantially less than the original amount. Committee unanimously recommended project be accepted as complete. 1993 Asphalt Overlays - Acceptance Wickstrom said this was an asphalt overlay contract to finish off an LID near the Garrison Creek Reservoir where we had an LID for sewer. He said because of winter weather, we had to close out the LID and reserve money to do the street restoration work until the following season. He said also that on Alvord we had another sewer LID; and because of the late time of year, we went back the next year and did the overlay. Wickstrom said the final amount was less than the original contract. Committee unanimously recommended project be accepted as complete. Reiten Road Landslide Repair - Acceptance Wickstrom said this was a project at Reiten Rd & Maclyn Street where the hillside was slipping away. He said the total amount was $25,050.00 and since the project was under $35,000, the Public Works Dept awarded it. He said there is another one to do further down the hill but this one is complete. Committee unanimously recommended project be accepted as complete. Family Homes Short Plat Bill of Sale Committee unanimously recommended bill of sale be accepted and bonds released after the one year maintenance period. 4 Kent City Council Meeting Date January 18 1994 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: NORTH 4TH AVENUE STREET REBUILD - ACCEPTANCE 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works Committee, authorization to accept as complete the contract with M. A. Segale, Inc. for the North 4th Avenue Street Rebuild project, and release of retainage after receipt of State releases. 3. EXHIBITS: Public Works Director memorandum, Public Works minutes and vicinity map 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 3J DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS JANUARY 52 1994 TO: PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE FROM: DON WICKSTROM PJJ RE: NORTH 4TH AVE STREET REBUILD - ACCEPT AS COMPLETE This project consisted of furnishing and placing approximately 4,345 tons of asphalt concrete pavement, 1562 square yards of roadway excavation, 952 square yards of cement concrete driveways and other related work. The project was awarded to M. A. Segale, Inc. for the bid amount of $243,274.00. The final construction cost is $208,768.32. ACTION: Recommend project be accepted as complete. OBRIEN 1 J 1 EL \ S ,r 212TH ST _ HOOL ■SCOOL `+---+ ,7 / O'BRIEN cc � J J Fire Station � N I , W K < go, .Is TH ST.� 6. 216 th. ST. 1 0.— ♦ t .S 218TH ST Of PROJECT :LOCATION I W . `IAL 0^ S. 220TH ST. I 1 '� J W < W r J' < I Oa ST �� Pn er Sub Stntlon - v f7 222MU S ~ 11 12 1 11 g 13 18 14 13 ° 1 M r 1 NORT i S227TM PL KEN ti TNTC 6 a ~ z 'D i ,^26 ST S 228 ST a f n 2 a » = < K INDUSTRIAL AREA N < < \ = z F � •T � I 1 NOVAK L i 167 400 z < . :IO ; N � s 10N - 40S. 234TH m ST Y < w< < �dTE COLE 3T � l �` h h�\ I :C• ti GP r < %I), %I-110 \I y7 st:••^ 0 LDRO WAY N CLOUDY ST s n z < j W LOU Y ST W u < S 233TH S < f' E OE ROE 0 - ST Jry ry n Z _ Z Z < ib 14 (13 - z t x ES ST z< Z I ST 23 24 wI\uul�l � �:• ( 1 II I I14 a RHI. 24 > � pQ W . 1'1 \� �• . •• W SCHOOL < E K C[0 G ST c > I <FIJ SAM ST < W Mill Creek Canyon Erosion - Acceptance Wickstrom said this was a project Public Works Dept awarded because it was under the bid limits and we were under time constraints to get the erosion control in Mill Creek and we had only a short amount of time to work in the creek due to the fish existing there. Wickstrom said we awarded the contract; it has been completed and the original amount was $34,991.88. He said there were some overruns of the original estimated quantities for dirt and rock which brought the final contract up to $39,500. In response to Johnson, Wickstrom said the additional funds came from the Mill Creek project and there is no problem with the funding. Committee unanimously recommended project be accepted as complete. North 4th Ave Street Rebuild - Acceptance Wickstrom said this was a project that we awarded to Segale to essentially rebuild the south half of N. 4th from 228th to Barnier's property which is half way to 212th St. He said the final contract amount was substantially less than the original amount. Committee unanimously recommended project be accepted as complete. 1993 Asphalt Overlays - Acceptance Wickstrom said this was an asphalt overlay contract to finish off an LID near the Garrison Creek Reservoir where we had an LID for sewer. He said because of winter weather, we had to close out the LID and reserve money to do the street restoration work until the following season. He said also that on Alvord we had another sewer LID; and because of the late time of year, we went back the next year and did the overlay. Wickstrom said the final amount was less than the original contract. Committee unanimously recommended project be accepted as complete. Reiten Road Landslide Repair - Acceptance Wickstrom said this was a project at Reiten Rd & Maclyn Street where the hillside was slipping away. He said the total amount was $25,050.00 and since the project was under $35,000, the Public Works Dept awarded it. He said there is another one to do further down the hill but this one is complete. Committee unanimously recommended project be accepted as complete- FamilV Homes Short Plat Bill of Sale Committee unanimously recommended bill of sale be accepted and bonds released after the one year maintenance period. 4 Kent City Council Meeting Date January 18. 1994 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: 1993 ASPHALT OVERLAYS - ACCEPTANCE 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works Committee, authorization to accept as complete the contract with Lakeside Industries for the 1993 Asphalt Overlays project, and release of retainage after receipt of State releases. 3. EXHIBITS: Public Works Director memorandum and Public Works minutes 4 RECOMMENDED BY: (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended RM 7. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember DISCUSSION: ACTION: oves, Councilmember seconds Council Agenda Item No. 3K DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS JANUARY 5, 1994 TO: PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE FROM: DON WICKSTROM 0 RE: 1993 ASPHALT OVERLAYS - ACCEPT AS COMPLETE This project consisted of furnishing and placing approximately 600 tons of asphalt concrete pavement and other related work, throughout various locations in the City. The project was awarded to Lakeside Industries for the bid amount of $28,975.00. The final construction cost is $27,603.24. ACTION: Recommend project be accepted as complete. Mill Creek Canyon Erosion - Acceptance Wickstrom said this was a project Public Works Dept awarded because it was under the bid limits and we were under time constraints to get the erosion control in Mill Creek and we had only a short amount of time to work in the creek due to the fish existing there. Wickstrom said we awarded the contract; it has been completed and the original amount was $34,991.88. He said there were some overruns of the original estimated quantities for dirt and rock which brought the final contract up to $39,500. In response to Johnson, Wickstrom said the additional funds came from the Mill Creek project and there is no problem with the funding. Committee unanimously recommended project be accepted as complete. North 4th Ave Street Rebuild --Acceptance Wickstrom said this was a project that we awarded to Segale to essentially rebuild the south half of N. 4th from 228th to Barnier's property which is half way to 212th St. He said the final contract amount was substantially less than the original amount. Committee unanimously recommended project be accepted as complete. 1993 Asphalt Overlays - Acceptance Wickstrom said this was an asphalt overlay contract to finish off an LID near the Garrison Creek Reservoir where we had an LID for sewer. He said because of winter weather, we had to close out the LID and reserve money to do the street restoration work until the following season. He said also that on Alvord we had another sewer LID; and because of the late time of year, we went back the next year and did the overlay. Wickstrom said the final amount was less than the original contract. Committee unanimously recommended project be accepted as complete. Reiten Road Landslide Repair - Acceptance Wickstrom said this was a project at Reiten Rd & Maclyn Street where the hillside was slipping away. He said the total amount was $25,050.00 and since the project was under $35,000, the Public Works Dept awarded it. He said there is another one to do further down the hill but this one is complete. Committee unanimously recommended project be accepted as complete. Family Homes Short Plat Bill of Sale Committee unanimously recommended bill of sale be accepted and bonds released after the one year maintenance period. 4 Kent City Council Meeting Date January 18, 1994 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: REITEN ROAD LANDSLIDE REPAIR - ACCEPTANCE 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works Committee, authorization to accept as complete the contract with Pile Contractors, Inc. for the Reiten Road Landslide Repair project, and release of retainage after receipt of State releases. 3. EXHIBITS: Public Works Director memorandum, Public Works minutes and vicinity map 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended 3 EXPENDITURE REQUIRED SOURCE OF FUNDS: _ N 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 3L DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS JANUARY 5, 1994 TO: PUBLIC WORKS COM,MI\TTEE FROM: DON WICKSTROM RE: REITEN ROAD LANDDSSLIDE REPAIR - ACCEPT AS COMPLETE This project consisted of drilling twelve 18" diameter augercast of existing sidewalk on Reiten Road in the piles behind the back vicinity of Maclyn Street. The project was awarded to Pile Contractors, Inc. for the bid amount of $26,800.00. The final construction cost is $25,050.00. ACTION: Recommend project be accepted as complete. � �: A ass ?•. ..� � �' ' ..1 LP, 1 " ca ✓+i <.C�\r �•`•y236TH C, 'C. dT (Pvt) ST -c•yy. t � ST t�..�:••r f � ' ; WALY Yf v,,I(LEY S.237TH PL19 H < H H (PK) co S U 0 ' N.T. < _ q..r W (Pvt) 'SE 239TH 6 a 5238TH Y�f © > x G ROE yy0y� W W W Z ,�s<7 '4'`\'v < p O ST- ST < 1< < � N = O N W Z Z <> i s s. 233 PL 18 17 0 >c MES ST y < s 2ao ST 4 Z = . 4. > w > Ped EAST HILL _ •u• KIEI SCHOOL 4 < E < rc S 241ST` ST a� ELEMENTARY W SCHOOL �Alhlehc FIJ CEO ST < W < S 242NDcr Y >[ Pf EER S. _/ 3 2 Z �. ST M ILLAN U E' '' M RA E ST S 243RD n > ST z 0 ST < Z z N 44ITST LINT �.. SMITH aT z S 44TH w 1- MEp1CAt U., ST > M W. 1Iz < NTT f.. r < o .> I WARD CE E - ST = Pi L�-Rf17E �'• !C. S1,V ST.JAM[S > F M KERz ST a �y rp h.f ; ~. y� SCHOOL a W �_1 rTO T '•` I E > ST n� �_`� OCY� ,.�• ';r J'. WEILAND x W S 246TH se z.er� sr - 1 < I j y 6 fhOS�r TACOMA ST 247THST a z S m se 2417TH $ W 4 516 n 4V m m CHERRY OC R W m WW HILL ST 248TH ST SE u1 NO E DEAN p > �i tTy 'cj ST = W ST <E MACLYN ST*' .t/i�•y `pf x m I W <> 2 4 / sT I E � 4 i •�a Q 0 W I SAAR 3 = p E OUIBERSON ST WAY W ••, + < . a ST AL \ . i t V z i W E SEATTLE 1• F 015 W W.,t.•r sT s'< < SEI,nLE ST Pi1OJECT LOCATION 3 ,.z.• > E v • RLI LL < W Z 0 hl AA%11 1'\I(h I, I'\I:h \1Y> O z r E CHICAGO ST T >> W 0 E> W < < c Y z CHIC kGO >p .{,� J i ,� +�'1,' ••`.l EA MO 0 z ST E LAUREL ST a j 7t /_'; log 'VD 'c m W m < T< y. f J.� lfl W ST 2 Y m p }• .l ••�'�T ,,\-, F,i„.ch SE 252ND < 0 $ 3-k aP U E HEMLOCK ST $ 'ia�l ` �; Field ST � a W CARTER z ; �•, 1. Klnq * 515 < a < ST a E FILBERT ST E2 e t W 4 1 COU^jY 1Ix MARION A P011ce W W d m W a R KENT—MERIDIAN- F ST ¢ W =W m rc 2 = < } �.• :L 0�0 (�j., 'i SR. HI. SCHOOL W > Y s ~ • 24 19 2 E m 5< WA UT m m ST t.` !< <+.�„ Y J 4 Z 25 30 W ° W >`' ,t;• . 30 w U O m < MAPLE ST • • ALL:' 1 1'' 1 F. ,,, ",a. •i & v:•, ren 8 „ n ie,ris Cluh 4 S 259TH ST H I N T 'A. CEMETERY •'..• 9 ♦ ' Gi EN111 '�• �• VO % ICH_ f le• SE 260TH 8T < SCENIC HILL EL - z _ "C i ELEMENTARY •1 .�ti i:.8.,t4'r SCHOOL / $ 1 DER LN 1S7 - •I S 262ND ST r m fR I N S ta2R0 f I 1� rl I a. > tl > ; _ SE .I `I c �•L ;1 n g m F Mill Creek Canyon Erosion - Acceptance Wickstrom said this was a project Public Works Dept awarded because it was under the bid limits and we were under time constraints to get the erosion control in Mill Creek and we had only a short amount of time to work in the creek due to the fish existing there. Wickstrom said we awarded the contract; it has been completed and the original amount was $34,991.88. He said there were some overruns of the original estimated quantities for dirt and rock which brought the final contract up to $39,500. In response to Creek projectstrom said and there i the noaditionl pa blemawithnts came m the Mill he funding. Committee unanimously recommended project be accepted as complete. North 4th Ave Street Rebuild - Acceptance Wickstrom said this was a project that we awarded to Segale to essentially rebuild the south half of N. 4th from 228th to Barnier's property which is half way to 212th St. He said the final contract amount was substantially less than the original amount. Committee unanimously recommended project be accepted as complete. 1993 Asphalt Overlays - Acceptance Wickstrom said this was an asphalt overlay contract to finish off an LID near the Garrison Creek Reservoir where we had an LID for sewer. He said because of winter weather, we had to close out the LID and reserve money to do the street restoration work until the following season. He said also that on Alvord we had another sewer LID; and because of the late time of year, we went back the next year and did the overlay. Wickstrom said the final amount was less than the original contract. Committee unanimously recommended project be accepted as complete. Wickstrom said this was a project at Reiten Rd & Maclyn Street where the hillside was slipping away. He said the total amount was $25,050.00 and since the project was under $35,000, the Public Works Dept awarded it. He said there is another one to do further down the hill but this one is complete. Committee unanimously recommended project be accepted as complete - Family Homes Short Plat Bill of Sale Committee unanimously recommended bill of sale be accepted and bonds released after the one year maintenance period. 4 Kent City Council Meeting Date January 18 1994 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: FAMILY HOMES SHORT PLAT - BILL OF SALE 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works Committee, authorization to accept the bill of sale and warranty agreement submitted by WBH, Inc. for continuous opera- tion and maintenance of 328 feet of water main, 328 feet of street improvement and 150 feet of storm sewers and release of bonds after expiration of the maintenance period. The project is in the vicinity of SE 254th Street & 114th Avenue SE. 3. EXHIBITS: Public Works Director memorandum, Public Works minutes and vicinity map 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 3M DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS JANUARY 5, 1994 TO: PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE FROM: DON WICKSTROM RE:. FAMILY HOMES SHORT PLAT - BILL OF SALE WBH Inc., the developer of Family Homes has completed the water, street and storm sewer improvements for this project. Family Homes Short Plat is in the vicinity of S.E. 254th St. and 114th Ave SE. ACTION: Recommend the Bill of Sale be accepted and bonds released after the one year maintenance period. � i ) n •Q y _ y g MAPLEW000 AVE ir cm ; •w -I L g KIMBER4 AVE A .,`- �4; `. 94TH AVE ! r0 6T, tw �,•�/� o _ r' 4�y �yV _O 9 96TH AVE S n(lmaau�(�ii �i3= 1 it(+•t w_> AVE S w +J• �'t C. N w w Ire- O gz3Av 7`' �, 'C o? r , N -IZ S',1 N 7TH N w N N )• - , r ? T,..{ ��'' �a• curl T z,: 14 1 !• LOQ •�l Mr z f`(, `�C�� * v'• N - Z 98TH AVE S 0 S AM C 98TH PL S M ` V (�J i •n _ i TOOTH = AVE SE 9TH i IFA 7 loOTw W S inx •©r�'s'� ' �` p z / t\L cvE SE: _ m {np =A m m 103RD g0 N AVE SE N r2 to inl 104TH AVE SE . w N AVE 2 . N i 108TH AVE SE Nw � • . �. w � 2 Spc g10 �D r A d 3NI P r r Z - 109TH PL SE IIOTH PL SE I(pv,t) W N 120TH =. m m r' 109TH AVE SE� 109TH 2 m AVE S "l7 • p •y 2 o CCS-. i � Cs7 111TH AVE SE \ Q l / 113TH AVE SE - z 114TH A E BE W }� w n �N I1 Trj N AVE + . 'T 1p U x AVE SE N y y W 117TH PL m BE 118THLyl A cn m CO m F (4 9rky m L4 N Ln AVE SE SF a p �•• 119T9 Z � "119 rr- ; Orn 120TH 121ST AVEAA SF 3Z N(1. 122N U n •"'In PL SE ^' 17 ST AVE S 3> = o D 0 �N N, 124TH AVE SE ' m r� y Z - 109TH PL SE IIOTH PL SE I(pv,t) W N 120TH Mill Creek Canyon Erosion - Acceptance Wickstrom said this was a project Public Works Dept awarded because it was under the bid limits and we were under time constraints to get the erosion control in Mill Creek and we had only a short amount of time to work in the creek due to the fish existing there. Wickstrom said we awarded the contract; it has been completed and the original amount was $34,991.88. He said there were some overruns of the original estimated quantities for dirt and rock which brought the final contract up to $39,500. In response to Johnson, Wickstrom said the additional funds came from the Mill Creek project and there is no problem with the funding. Committee unanimously recommended project be accepted as complete. North 4th Ave Street Rebuild - Acceptance Wickstrom said this was a project that we awarded to Segale to essentially rebuild the south half of N. 4th from 228th to Barnier's property which is half way to 212th St. He said the final contract amount was substantially less than the original amount. Committee unanimously recommended project be accepted as complete. 1993 Asphalt Overlays - Acceptance Wickstrom said this was an asphalt overlay contract to finish off an LID near the Garrison Creek Reservoir where we had an LID for sewer. He said because of winter weather, we had to close out the LID and reserve money to do the street restoration work until the following season. He said also that on Alvord we had another sewer LID; and because of the late time of year, we went back the next year and did the overlay. Wickstrom said the final amount was less than the original contract. Committee unanimously recommended project be accepted as complete. Reiten Road Landslide Repair - Acceptance Wickstrom said this was a project at Reiten Rd & Maclyn Street where the hillside was slipping away. He said the total amount was $25,050.00 and since the project was under $35,000, the Public Works Dept awarded it. He said there is another one to do further down the hill but this one is complete. Committee unanimously recommended project be accepted as complete. Family Homes Short Plat Bill of Sale Committee unanimously recommended bill of sale be accepted and bonds released after the one year maintenance period. 4 Kent City Council Meeting Date January 18 1994 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: STONE PINE EAST SEWER EXTENSION - BILL OF SALE 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works Committee, authorization to accept the bill of sale and warranty agreement submitted by Chaffey Corporation for con- tinuous operation and maintenance of 1,008 feet of sanitary sewer improvements and release of bonds after expiration of the maintenance period. The project is in the vicinity of SE 213th Place & 104th Avenue SE. 3. EXHIBITS: Public Works Director memorandum, Public Works minutes and vicinity map 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended RM EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 3N DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS JANUARY 5, 1994 TO: PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE FROM: DON WICKSTROM RE: STONE PINE EAST SEWER EXTENSION - BILL OF SALE Chaffey Corporation, the developer of Stone Pine East has completed the sanitary sewer improvements for this project. Stone Pine East is in the vicinity of S.E. 213th Pl and 104th Ave SE. ACTION: Recommend the Bill of Sale be accepted and bonds released after the one year maintenance period. I ISTTH ^ F 200TH a ST. ,. r SE 200TH a ST { Z W 4 W OV W N S 202ND ST SPRINnBROOK ELEMENTARY, HOOL W a W N p ♦yZ f�pp 0 O O W 1 uwi SE < 204TH ST Z •' >. f L i SE a > Y < g e¢ 1 205TH < 6. ST W SE2H,�? > F �' S 20�H N N ,j W 206T< O N O > J < BE (PK) Z NS 206TH a �:207w PL Z ? ST SE -e a< a Ii.,� Z 2077TH WI•�' , ~I SI'Z N �. N W �tH SrS 07TH P TH 7 6 r,';� SE 208TH ST �ilh N a !U < - _ 5 4 N 20 H _ w PANTHER LAKE : Stone Pine East Sewer Extension le committee after the one year maintenance d bill of aperiod.accpted and bonds Robinson Sewer Extension Committee unanimously recommended bill of sale be accepted and bonds released after the one year maintenance period. Conservation Futures Grants wickstrom stated that this is a contract where the City will get approximately $800,00 for three parcels, and one is $500,000 for the Lagoon acquisition. He said Parks has one near the newspaper office and one at the upper end of Mill Creek at 104th & 267th. He said the Parks Committee has already approved their two parcels and we wanted to make sure that when this agreement came before Council, that the $500,000 would be included which would eliminate coming back to Committee. Brubaker stated that he has reviewed the contract and recommended some changes in the Indemnification. Brubaker feels he will be successful in getting the County to look at it a little differently but right now the way the Indemnification is written, it is called a "sole negligence standard" where basically unless County is solely responsible for damages arising from this contract, we are to indemnify the County to pay for 100% of the damages. He said in other words, if there is a claim arising from this contract against both the County and the City, and a jury finds that the County is 90% responsible for the damages and we are only 10% responsible, we still pay 100%. Brubaker said only in those instances where the jury finds the County 100% responsible do they agree to pay for the damages. Brubaker said he is trying to get them to agree to a straight forward comparative negligent standard. Committee unanimously recommended authorization for the Mayor to sign the agreement, dependent on the City Attorney concurring with the County on the change in the indemnification language. Meeting adjourned at 6:30 P.M. R Kent City Council Meeting Date January 18 1994 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: ROBINSON SEWER EXTENSION - BILL OF SALE 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works Committee, authorization to accept the bill of sale and warranty agreement submitted by Grace Robinson for continuous operation and maintenance of 371 feet of sanitary sewer improvements and release of bonds after expiration of the maintenance period. The project is in the vicinity of 94th Avenue South & South 232nd Street. 3. EXHIBITS: Public Works Director memorandum, Public Works minutes and vicinity map 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended [in EXPENDITURE RE9UIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 30 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS I . JANUARY 5, 1994 TO: PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE FROM: DON WICKSTROM RE: ROBINSON SEWER EXTENSION - BILL OF SALE Grace Robinson, the developer of Robinson Sewer Extension has improvements for this project, in the completed the sanitary sewer vicinity of 94th Avenue S & S 232nd Street. ACTION: Recommend the Bill of Sale be accepted and bonds released after the one year maintenance period. LEMEN Su' SL,bJn I � y) j < < � � SF 209TH PL IW JS 210TH PL Vr z SF 210TH P.. 62 Hn o o SE 211' L4 O21 T� t —�-- SE ^, < 4 J q0,�, Z t 12TH ST 5 212 "� W s o 212TH ST y y v m � 4 95 PL 1� ry S ��gti Z `•� SE 3�y gT2 3TH ♦ o i Z fEN Sr ST < r S 21 H $ 213TH SE 213TH PL 37 jy PL Z p^ 1 PL P 21q�• r- .. c !!!«< y g N � < S 216TH o ST > •, ,r < SE 216TH N y 1sT a ST t » o 218TH - 1 S 2 N ST / �`� SE 219T S \ ST _ `rt2if-%0-. I . z S' S 0 22 ST INI'l1STRIAI e may..,. `J•a' . ;..Y' AREA ' SE 222ND 222ND ST � � STW ST S 222HUv< Z ~ F~ 2 W Gj » 7 8 SE 224TH ST 12 7 t — 18 17 1813 oil NORT i s i 3E 226 KEN < Y r %, TNTC 6 = �Y ° F x <" aF • r _ t H » Lt`i•r�. ?� 228TH o. i" 3E 2287.1 PL w 2Zr i 228 ST td ST •.1 s r� \ » J •�E 229Th Z h r� - PL S Oy < �' < ; •� SE 231 ti 1 ST gT Hy 230TH' PROJECT LOCATION ,, STlgT g�)315T g < PL .Y 232ND ;;� g 232ND�E 232ND � gE NOYAK L I�! ST ST g W) S 94TH Q S '.. _ rye �o 1 on 1 F S 236TH S, , � l �'T.Np� \� .^ F. \ 1 •, C 1 P��� `* W O In J LDRON "f �.:• �'..u•) WAY P�( S. 237TH PL 0 > (EY < ,n 0 (Pvt) m SE 239TH W !Z IL 5238TH Q > W ST OE RG E O p• = z ry W ST K i < a S 2M PL 18 17 ° < z ` 3 240a sr ST ! ! _ > » Ped 0.1' .i EAST HILL <Ile ELEMENTARY KENT n •1 8 241ST 3T K SCHOOL stone Pine East Sewer Extension Committee unanimously recommended bill of sale be accepted and bonds released after the one year maintenance period. Robinson Sewer Extension Committee unanimously recommended bill of sale be accepted and bonds released after the one year maintenance period. Conservation Futures Grants Wickstrom stated that this is a contract where the City will get approximately $800,00 for three parcels, and one is $500,000 for the Lagoon acquisition. He said Parks has one near the newspaper office and one at the upper end of Mill Creek at 104th & 267th. He said the Parks Committee has already approved their two parcels and we wanted to make sure that when this agreement came before Council, that the $500,000 would be included which would eliminate coming back to Committee. Brubaker stated that he has reviewed the contract and recommended some changes in the Indemnification. Brubaker feels he will be successful in getting the County to look at it a little differently but right now the way the Indemnification is written, it is called a "sole negligence standard" where basically unless County is solely responsible for damages arising from this contract, we are to indemnify the County to pay for 100% of the damages. He said in other words, if there is a claim arising from this contract against both the County and the City, and a jury finds that the County is 90% responsible for the damages and we are only 10% responsible, we still pay 100%. Brubaker said only in those instances where the jury finds the County 100% responsible do they agree to pay for the damages. Brubaker said he is trying to get them to agree to a straight forward comparative negligent standard. Committee unanimously recommended authorization for the Mayor to sign the agreement, dependent on the City Attorney concurring with the County on the change in the indemnification language. Meeting adjourned at 6:30 P.M. 5 Kent City Council Meeting Date January 18 1994 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: CONSERVATION FUTURES GRANT 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works Committee, authorization for the Mayor to sign the King County Conservation Futures Grant Agreement upon the City Attorney's concurrence with the language therein, for the receipt of grant funds to acquire land and/or open space for; A) Kent Lagoons Wetlands/Wildlife Enhancement project, B) the Upper Mill Creek Canyon Park, and C) the Riverview park. 3. EXHIBITS: Public Works minutes and agreement 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES K FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended/,Not Recommended go EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 3P INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN KING COUNTY AND THE CITY OF KENT 1993 REGIONAL CONSERVATION FUTURES ACQUISITION PROGRAM This Interlocalcooperation Agreement is entered into between the city of Kent ( City' ) and King County ("County") - ARTICLE I. RECITALS On March 8, 1993, the King County Council passed Ordinance 10750 which authorized the 1993 Regional Conservation Futures Acquisition Program and declared the Council's intent to issue bonds to finance the acquisition of public open spaces, funded through the Conservation Futures tax levy to pay the principal and interest on such bonds. Projects to be funded from bond proceeds include projects of Extraordinary Regional Significance, Local Projects in Unincorporated King County, Local Projects of The City of Seattle and Local Projects in Suburban Cities. Prior to the distribution of bond proceeds by the County to an eligible jurisdiction, Ordinance No. 10750 requires execution of an Interlocal Cooperation Agreement containing provisions necessary to satisfy applicable federal tax laws and regulations and to make certain other provisions. On August 25, 1993, the King County open Space Citizens Oversight Committee (the "Committee") approved its recommended allocation of the tion Program fund he 1993 Regional Conservation Futures Acquisirfrom a t t to Regional and Suburban City Local Projects categories p Ordinance 10750. On October 11, 1993, the King County Council, by Ordinance 11068, approved the allocation of funds to projects. In consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, and Washington State Chapter 39.34, the parties agree as follows: DECEMBER 29, 1993 1 CFT INTERLOCAL - KENT ARTICLE II. DEFINITIONS. g ion, general management 2.1. Administrative Costs. All ne otiat expenses incurred by City in implementing the Projects, and indirect exp costs of the including, without limitation, King County staffing Committee and costs of overseeing the Program. 2.2. gr A_ gem_ ent. This interlocal cooperation agreement between m the the. County and the City regarding the distribution of proceeds froram sale of bonds for open space as described and authorized by g Ordinances.assed 2.3, Bond Ordinance . King County Ordinance 11121, p November 22, 1993, authorized the issuance and sale of bonds to finance the projects authorizing by Ordinance No. 10750 and Ordinance 11068 or subsequently approved by the County. proceeds received from the 2,4, Bond Proceeds. The principal pro accrued t on the sale of bonds. The term shall otinclude n lua he bonds oranyearnings bonds paid by the original purchaser received from the investment of bond principal. 2,5, Bond Redemption Fund. The County fund designated by ordinance for the purpose of paying the princil of and interest on pa any bonds issued by the County. . 2.6. Bonds. Any bonds, notes or other evidence of indebtedness sold pursuant to the Bond Ordinance and any refunding bonds issued in lieu thereof. 2,7, Capital Costs;' The term "capital costs" shall be construed consistent with the term capital purposes" in Article VII, § 2(b) of the the Washington State Constitution. The term shalment forl not alld costs replacement of equipment. The term may include pay related to acquiring real property, including, without limitation, real estate appraisals, legal and acquisition costs; making qualified ect administration expenses; reimbursements; paying necessary proj staffing costs of the Citizens Oversight Committee; interest payments pending the receipt of Bond Proceeds; and on any interim financing p g paying the .costs and expenses incurred in issuing the bonds, administering the planning and distribution of Proceeds and other on-going administrative costs of overseeing the Program. DECEMBER 29, 1993 2 CFT INTERLOCAL - KENT 2.8. Citizens Oversi ht Committee or Commmitt_8e. That King County Open Space Citizen Oversight Committee established following enactment of Ordinance 9071 and authorized under ordinance 10750 to review and report to the King County Council on implementation of the 1993 Regional Conservation Futures Acquisition Program. The Committee is also responsible for recommending to the Council reallocations of Bond Proceeds when available for new or revisesprojects ing as chief 2,9, Chief Financial Officer. The person ery financial officer of the County's Office o Financial Management. 2.10. amended, 2.10. Code. The Internal Revenue Code together with all applicable regulations. 2.11. Conservation Futures. The term "conservation futures" means the fee simple or any lesser interest, development right, easement, covenant, or other contractual right necessary in order to protect, preserve, maintain, improve, restore, limit future useof, er otherwise conserve open space land which may be acquired by p gift, grant, bequest, devise, lease or otherwise, except by eminent domain, all in accordance with the provisions of RCW 84.34 and King County ordinances 10750 and 11068. 11 " „ en space land" 2.12. Opp_ __n space. The term open space or op shall have the same meaning as set forth in RCW 84.34.20 as now or hereafter amended. This statute currently defines these terms as (a) any land area so designated by official comprehensive land use plan and adopted by a city or county and zoned accordingly, or (b) any land conserve area, the preservation of which in its present use would (i)and enhance natural or scenic resources, ('i) protect streams or water servation of soils, wetlands, beaches or tidal supply, (iii) promote con the public of abutting and neighbor - marshes, (iv) enhance the value to l reservations or sanctu- ing parks, forests, wildlife reserves, natura aries or other open space, (v) enhance recreational activities, (vi) preserve historic sites, or (vii) retain in its natural state, tracts of land not less than five acres situated lrrean urban area and open to asonably requ r d by the public use on such conditions as may be legislative body granting the open space classification. 2.13. Program. The 1993 Regional Conservation Futures Acquisition Program as authorized by the Program ordinances. DECEMBER 29, 1993 3 CFT INTERLOCAL - KENT 2.14. Program Ordinances. The term "Program Ordinances" means -- King County Ordinances 10750 and 11068 and the Bond Ordinance. 2.15. Project. The term "Project" means a specific project for acquisition of open space to which any Bond Proceeds are allocated which meet open space criteria as described in Ordinance 10750, Attachments A, B and C, and RCW 84.34.020. 2.16. Project Categories. As set forth in Ordinance No. 10750, Project Categories are the Regional Projects, King County Local Projects, Suburban City Local Projects or Seattle Local Projects. 2.17. ualified Reimbursements. Reimbursements of advances for Project costs made after the enactment of Ordinance 10750 from other funds in anticipation of the receipt of Bond Proceeds as evidenced by written records made contemporaneously with such advances and in a form acceptable to the Chief Financial Officer. This includes interest charges paid to acquire interim financing. 2.18. scope Change. The terms scope change" means a deviation or change in a project's description that results in a more than 10%, but less than 50%, increase, decrease or difference in a project's total acreage or budget. If a deviation or change in a project's description results in an increase, decrease or difference in a project's acreage or budget of greater than 50%, it shall be considered a new project. For Seattle, such a change that results solely from application of funds from its "Unprogrammed Project Funding" Project shall not be considered a "scope change" or a "new project". 2.19. Taxable Bonds. Bonds on which the interest is included in the gross income of recipients thereof by reason of the failure to comply with applicable requirements of the Code. 2.20. Tax Exempt Bonds. Bonds on which the interest is not included in the gross income of the recipients thereof by reason of section 103(a) of the Code of 1986 as amended. ARTICLE III. TERM OF AGREEMENT. This Agreement shall continue in full force and effect and bind the parties hereto upon execution of the Agreement by both parties. The term of the Agreement shall be indefinite. The Agreement will terminate only if the City (i) is unable or unwilling to expend the DECEMBER 29, 1993 CFT INTERLOCAL - KENT 4 funds provided through this Agreement, (ii) satisfies the matching requirements, if any, contained in this Agreement, and (iii) upon reimbursement by the City to the County of all unexpended funds provided by the County pursuant to this Agreement in the manner and amounts described below. The terms of Sections 4.31 4.41 4.51 4.61 7.1, 7.2 and 9.1 shall survive termination of this Agreement. ARTICLE IV. CONDITIONS OF AGREEMENT. roved b 4.1. Project Description. Those Projects currently app y the County are listed in Attachment A, which is incorporated herein by reference. All Projects must meet open space criteria as described in King County Ordinance 10750, Attachment B, and RCW 84.34. City may propose a scope change to a project's description by providing a written request to the Office of Open Space and to the Committee and by submitting with such request a revised implementation schedule reflecting such proposed scope change. The Committee shall have forty- five (45) days to review and recommend approval or disapproval to the Council of the City's proposed scope change. The King County Executive shall submit the City proposal and the Committee recommendation to the King County Council which shall determine by established procedures for King County Capital Improvement Projects whether or not to make such scope change. 4.2. Project Implementation. Project Implementation shall proceed upon the schedule as set forth in Attachment B, which is incorporated herein by reference, or as set forth in approved modifications to the implementation schedule set forth in Attachment B. The parties recognize that delay in implementation of Projects may jeopardize the financial viability of the Projects as currently approved and the tax exempt status of interest on the Bonds. The City, therefore, certifies that, as to its Projects, it has reviewed its real property acquisition procedures, commits to all reasonable action and will proceed with due, diligence to ensure that its Projects are expeditiously completed in accordance with the Project implementation schedule, and that it will give highest priority to those properties where there is a particular threat of conversion to a more intensive use or increases in acquisition costs. If City has not demonstrated 5 DECEMBER 29, 1993 CFT INTERLOCAL - KENT ual reporting pursuant to Article through its October 1994 semi-ann. V: Of this Agreement that it has made substantial progress in implementing a project, the Council may, after receipt of the Executive's acquisition progress report as provided in Ordinance 11068, reallocate project funds or extend project completion deadline., Any project funds not expended by October 20, 1995 shall be reprogrammed to other projects. unds. Funds in the form of Bond Proceeds made 4.3. Use of F Agreement, as well as matching available to the City pursuant to this funds provided by the City pursuant to this Agreement, may be used to defray capital costs of projects pursuant to the Program Ordinances, RCW 84.34 and this Agreement. Funds utilized pursuant to this Agreement may not be used to purchase Conservation Futures obtained through the exercise of eminent domain. Seattle may apply funds from its "Unprogrammed Program Funding" Project to any other Project in its sole discretion.The 4.4. Project Administration and Maintenance in Perpetuity. City shall perform and bear all of the cost of all necessar administration and maintenance for its Projects. The City, or any successor in interest, agrees to maintain properties acquired with funds provided pursuant to this Agreement as open space in perpetuity. If the City wishes to change the status or use of properties acquired with funds provided pursuant to -this Agreement to any other purpose, the City shall, at the County's discretion, pay the County an amount in cash equal to the property's fair market value or substitute other property of equal or better market and open value acceptable to the County. In either case, the value of property shall be established at the time of the change in status or use, based on the best and highest use and not necessarily based on its value as open space. At its own cost, the City will provide the County an independent M.A.I. appraisal of such Property's fair market value in accordance with this section. The value established by the appraisal will not be binding on the County. The City shall provide the County with writte notice of its desire to the change of use of the Property and shall submit such M.A.I. appraisal and proposed substitute properties with DECEMBER 29, 1993 6 CFT INTERLOCAL - KENT such notice. The County shall within ninety (90) days respond by (i) accepting such appraised value; (ii) requesting additional information regarding such proposed substitute land; or (iii) rejecting both the appraised value and proposed substitutes. The County shall not unreasonably exercise its discretion and shall work with the City to expeditiously resolve issues relating to an acceptable valuation or substitution. If and when the County has agreed upon an acceptable valuation or substitution, the City shall either pay the County the full amount of the valuation or record appropriate declarations of restrictive covenants upon the substitute property. The City shall not change the use of the Property until the County has agreed in writing to an acceptable substitution or valuation and made such payment or recorded such declarations. Nothing herein shall prevent the City from granting easements, franchises or concessions or from making joint use agreements or other operational agreements which are compatible with the use of a Project for the purposes authorized in this Agreement and the Program Ordinances and do not materially diminish the open space value of the Property. The City shall notify the County of all such proposed franchises, concessions or agreements not less than thirty (30) days prior to their effect. 4.5. Special Conditions. As set forth in the Ordinances, the Agreement between the County and the City may contain special conditions. If applicable, such special conditions are described on Attachments A, B and C and are incorporated herein by reference. 4.6. signs. The City shall install, within three months of acquisition, and maintain signs identifying the property purchased under the Program as having been acquired under King County's 1993 Regional Conservation Futures Acquisition Program. Such signs shall be clearly visible to the public entering upon the Property or, where public access is inappropriate, clearly visible from the public right- of-way to the extent practicable. Such signs shall be of an appropri- ate size (generally not smaller than two feet by three feet) and such identification shall be as prominent as any other identifications of the Property. The City also shall install within three months of the date of this Agreement or within three months of the date of CFT INTERLOCAL - KENT 7 DECEMBER 29, 1993 acquisition and maintain similar signs on all property acquired with.. funds under the 1989 King County open space Bond Program identifying the property as having been acquired under such Program. Recording of this Agreement. As part of the closing of 4.7 y parcel escrow of the acquisition of any Conservation Future upon an within a Project, City shall record with King County's Department of Records and Elections either this AgreementorCounty memorandum of this Agreement in a form approved in writing by the ARTICLE V. BOND PROCEEDS. 5.1. Distribution of Principal Proceeds. The Principal Proceeds of the Bonds shall be deposited in a fund or funds to be designated by the County for the purpose of administering, disbursing and accounting for Bond Proceeds. Within said fund or funds, Bond principal will be distributed to the City as set forth in Section 5.4 of thitrA r h efts 5,2, Investment of Bond g Proceeds. The County, lacing office of Financial Management, shall be responsible for p investments of cash balances. The County will be responsible fol— arbitrage calculations and related actions required by the Code to ensure compliance with arbitrage regulations. 5.3. Interest Earnings. Interest earnings on the Principal Bond eposited in the Bond Redemption Fund to Proceeds will be collected and d pay a portion of the principal of and interest on the bond debt. 5.4. Bond Proceeds Disbursement. Bond Proceeds will be disbursed to the City upon receipt and verification of properly completed requests for payment of Bond Proceeds by the King y office of open Space or its successor. The disbursements will be made in one of two ways: (1) by wire transfer up to five (5) days prior to the closing date upon receipt by the County of a completed request form, a copy of the signed purchase document, an estimated settlement statement, and electronic wiring instructions to the closing agent or City if so requested; or (2) by Automated Clearinghouse transmittal to the City for Qualified Reimbursement for expenditures for Capital Costs. The City shall provide a list of authorized individuals t certify the requests submitted to the County. The City will be 8 DECEMBER 29, 1993 CFT INTERLOCAL - KENT responsible for the accuracy of the payment requests and the propriety and timeliness of its disbursements of the Bond Proceeds. 5.5. Disposition of Remaining Band Proceeds. a. Bond Proceeds Reallocation - Project Completion. If, upon completion of a Project, Bond Proceeds exist in excess of the amount necessary to reimburse the appropriate Capital Cost of a Project, then the City may propose to reallocate such excess Bond Proceeds to other existing Projects by providing a written request to the office of open Space and to the Committee and by submitting with such request a revised implementation schedule reflecting such proposed reallocation. The Committee shall have forty-five (45) days to review and recommend approval or disapproval to the Council of the City's proposed reallocation. The King County Executive shall submit the City proposal and the Committee recommendation to the King County Council which shall determine by ordinance whether or not to make such reallocation. b. Bond Proceeds Reallocation - Project Abandonment. The City may abandon a Project only upon a determination and finding of fact through its normal legislative process that changes in conditions or new information developed after approval of funding of Projects prevent the practical accomplishment of the Project or clearly indicate that the Project would no longer best serve its intended purpose. If the City abandons a Project, and excess Bond Proceeds remain, the City may propose to reallocate such excess Bond Proceeds to other existing approved City Projects following the same procedure as set forth in 5.5.a. above and shall submit to the Committee a certified copy of its legislative action by which it made such determination of fact. C. Bond Proceeds Reallocation - New Projects. The City may request to reallocate excess Bond Proceeds to a new Project if it makes a determination through its normal legislative processes that the proposed new Project is consistent with the purpose of the Bonds. If the City requests to reallocate excess Bond Proceeds to a new Project, the City shall forward its proposal to the Committee for its review and recommendation to the Council in the same manner as 5.5.a. above, and shall submit a certified copy of its legislative action by which it made such determination. CFT INTERLOCAL - KENT 9 DECEMBER 29, 1993 Following the County's adoption of 5.6. Interim Financin4• obligations in Ordinance 11068, the City may have issued short-term oblig the same efray anticipation of reimbursement from Bond Proceeds e ut aized.d The payment of Capital Costs for which Bond Proceeds may principal and interest upon such short-term obligations shall be a iture of Bond Proceeds to the extent that the proper object of expend rate of such interest is reasonable. ARTICLE VI. REPORTING RE UIREMENTS. Projects, 6.1. Reporting Schedule. During implementation of the the City shall provide the County and the Committee semi-annual reports describing Project Implementation status. Such reports shall cove Ap ril 1 through September 30 and October 1 through six-month periods of March 31 and shall be submitted no la an All such twentieththe working be following the end of the reporting period. submitted to the County's Department of Parks, Planning and Resources Office of Open space, or its successors. 6.2. Report Information. The reports shall contain the following information: in a. An accounting of cash expenditures and encumbrances for or support of the project, including a separate accounting Administrative Costs; ro ect showing the anticipated b• A work plan for each p j in the date by which City expects to achieve the followi(g)msurveyncompleted acquisition process: (1) title report reviewed; (3) environmental assessment completed (if necessary) (if necessary); eviewed; (5) first offer made; (6) (4) appraisal completed and r purchase agreement executed; and (7) property acquired; G. The progress of City in accomplishing milestones for each Project and any changes to the time line; and d. Other relevant information requested by the County for the purpose of determining compliance with this Agreement. ARTICLE VII. TAX COVENANTS as such Bonds Preservation of Tax Exempt Status. the first longas of are outstanding or for twentyyears after DECEMBER 29, 1993 10 CFT INTERLOCAL - KENT Bond Proceeds, whichever is longer: a. The City will not use or permit to be used any of the Bond Proceeds or the property or facilities acquired, constructed, developed or improved as part of the Projects in such manner and shall not take or omit to take any other action as to cause the interest on the Bonds to be included in the gross income of the recipients thereof for purposes of federal income taxation. b. The City will provide certificates when and as required by the County's bond counsel, the Code or the Internal Revenue Service in order to establish or maintain the tax exempt status of interest on the Bonds. C. The City will comply with any requirements imposed by the Code in order to preserve the tax exempt status of interest on the Bonds. The City will cooperate in any audit by the Internal Revenue Service, including disclosure of any records, contracts and other materials required by the Internal Revenue service in order to establish or preserve the Bonds' tax exempt status or as may be required by the Code. 7.2. Indemnification. If the Bonds become Taxable Bonds as a result of the acts or omissions of the City not approved in writing by the County, the City shall indemnify and hold the County, its officers, employees and agents, including bond counsel, harmless with respect to bond holders' claims and any costs attendant thereto, including any penalties and the County's attorneys' fees and costs. in defending such claims. ARTICLE VIII. RESPONSIBILITIES OF COUNTY. 8.1. Issuance of Bonds. Subject to the terms of this Agreement and the Program Ordinances, the County will issue Bonds for the purposes set forth herein and in the Program Ordinances. 8.2. Distribution of Bond Proceeds. Distribution to the City of any Bond Proceeds is specifically conditioned upon execution by the City and the County of this Agreement. 8.3. Future Support. The County assumes no obligation for the future support of the Projects described herein, or any other projects, except as expressly set forth in this Agreement. CFT INTERLOCAL - KENT 11 DECEMBER 29, 1993 ARTICLE IX. GENERAL PROVISIONS 9.1. Hold Harmless and Indemnification. a. The County assumes no responsibility for the payment of any compensation, fees, wages, benefits or taxes to or on behalf of the City, its employees, contractors or others by reason of this Agreement. The City shall protect, indemnify and save harmless the County, its officers, agents and employees from any and all claims, costs and losses whatsoever occurring or resulting from (1) the City's failure to pay any compensation, wage, fee, benefit or tax, and (2) the supplying to the City of work, services, materials or supplies by City employees or agents or other contractors or suppliers in connection with or in support of ,performance of this Agreement. b. The City further agrees that it is financially responsible for and will repay the County all indicated amounts following an audit exception which occurs due to the negligent or intentional acts or failure for any reason to comply with the terms of this Agreement by the City, its officers, employees, agents or representatives. C. The City shall protect, defend, indemnify and save harmless the County from any and all costs, claims, judgments or awards of damages, including attorneys' fees, arising out of or in any way resulting from the Projects, including but not limited to the negligent acts or omissions of the City, its officers, employees or agents, but not including the solely negligent acts or omissions of the County, its officers, employees or agents. For purposes of this Agreement only, the City agrees to waive the immunity granted for industrial insurance claims pursuant to Washington statute chapter 52 to the extent necessary to extend its obligation under this subparagraph to any claim, demand, or cause of action brought by or on behalf of any employees, including judgments, awards and costs arising therefrom including attorneys' fees. 9.2. Amendments or Modifications. The parties reserve the right to amend or modify this Agreement. Such amendments or modifications must be by written instrument, signed by the parties and approved b the respective City and County Councils. CfT INTERLOCAL - KENT 12 DECEMBER 29, 1993 9.3. contract waiver. No waiver by either party of any term or condition of this Agreement shall be deemed or construed to be a waiver of any other term or condition, nor shall a waiver of any breach, be deemed to constitute a waiver of any subsequent breach whether of the same or a different provision of this Agreement. No waiver shall be effective unless made in writing. 9.4. Notices. Any notice, consent, demand or other communica- tion hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been given if delivered in person or deposited in any United States Postal Service mail box, first class postage prepaid, or sent by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, addressed to the party for whom it is intended as follows: (1) To the City: City of Kent Ms. Helen Wickstrom Superintendent of Parks Administration 220 Fourth Avenue South Kent, WA 98032 (2) To the County: King County Office of Open Space 1621 Smith Tower 506 Second Avenue Seattle, Washington 98104 with a copy to: Chief Financial Officer 400 King County Courthouse Seattle, Washington 98104 These titles and addresses may be changed by written notice to the other party pursuant to this provision. 9.5. interpretation. This Agreement shall be interpreted according to and enforced under the laws of the State of Washington. The section and subsection captions of this Agreement are for convenience only and shall not control or affect the meaning or construction of any provision in this Agreement. 9.6. Separability. Each provision of this Agreement is separable from all other provisions. In the event any court of competent jurisdiction determines that any provision of this Agreement is invalid or unenforceable for any reason, all remaining provisions will remain in full force and effect. CFT INTERLOCAL - KENT 13 DECEMBER 29, 1993 9.7. Entirety_. This Agreement is a complete expression of th_ terms hereto and any oral representations or understandings not incorporated are excluded. This Agreement merges and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations, and agreements between the parties relating to the Bonds, Bond Proceeds or Projects and constitutes the entire Agreement between the parties. The parties recognize time is of the essence in the performance of the provisions of this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, authorized representatives of the parties hereto have signed their names in the spaces set forth below. KING COUNTY KING COUNTY EXECUTIVE DATE: ACTING UNDER AUTHORITY OF MOTION #92-02 Approved as to form: NORM MALENG King County Prosecuting Attorney: CITY OF KENT By Its DATE: ACTING UNDER AUTHORITY OF No. Approved as to form: City Attorney DECEMBER 29, 1993 CFT INTERLOCAL - KENT 14 APPROVED PROJECTS suburban Cities ATTACHMENT A CFT INTERLOCAL - KENT 15 DECEMBER 29, 1993 Allocation City__ Project Auburn Green River Access 300,000 $ 1,800,000 Auburn Olson Canyon 21500,000 Bellevue Meydenbauer Bay Gilman/Sammamish Bothell Burke 950,000 River Greenway 118,000 Duvall Dougherty Farm Visitation 340,000 Federal Way Sisters of Fisher's Pond and Federal Way School Site No. 20 1,060,000 Issaquah Tibbott Property (Tiger Mountain) Property 1,500,000 500,000 Issaquah Issaquah Creek - Johnson 500,000 Kent Green River NREA 71,000 Kent Upper Mill Creek Canyon 236,000 Kent Riverview Park 200 000 Kirkland Juanita Bay Park Expansion r 1,200,000 Kirkland Brink Park Expansion 25,000 L.Forest Pk McAleer Creek OS Program 2,500,000 North Bend/ Meadowbrook Farm Snoqualmie E. Lake Sammamish Waterfront Pk. 11000,000 Redmond Cedar River Trail 1,800,000 Renton Springbrook Trail 300,000 Renton Woodinville Woodinville Green Gateway 800,000 CFT INTERLOCAL - KENT 15 DECEMBER 29, 1993 City of Seattle Pro'ect North Beach Natural Area Sunset Hill Greenbelt Thornton Creek Additions: Little Brook) (Maple Creek, San Point Way, Llandover Woods: 3rd NW and NW 145th 14043 - 32nd NE 1,260,900 Fremont/Vemo Burke -Gilman Greenway: Silver Cloud Burke -Gilman Greenway: DNR Burke Gilman Greenway: NW 85th & Sand Point Way Ste Mark's Greenbelt Magnolia Greenbelt Northeast Queen Anne Greenbelt Tip MGM Eastlake 3001 East Madison Madison McGilvra Northeast Queen Anne Overlook Duwamish Head Greenbelt Pelly Place Natural Area Arroyos Natural Area Maple School Ravine Natural Area Orchard Street Ravine Natural Area Puget Creek Unprogrammed Project Funding Allocation $ 137,700 329,400 900,000 1,331,100 540,000 272,700 267,300 1,530,000 264,600 188,100 709,200 1,278,900 473,400 450,000 819,900 5,400,000 447,300 248,400 281,700 270,900 778,500 2,020,000 16 DECEMBER 29, 1993 CfT INTERLOCAL - KENT I H qualmieIver/Hti1 tar is 140 -acre roject t incl "I 2 45 orof a simple cquisit4 and 95 a es of le s than \\ J Lee velopme rights. This prc_j ct includ obtain public 4 acces to the ach at th large r1 er bend the Hort.. est 5 corner the pr erty (pa of part "H" an a attache 6 ap) . 7 I is Arden ese rre act "H" cludes a 3 -acre u and parte H adj ent to get Sou in the nis Arde neighbor h ad locate 9 scutl of the t inus a 15th Ave ue North st in Sea tie. 10 a1 Con tion: .e county hall see to obtal access 11 rig. s on the t'_deland adjacent to the 2., acre site 12 Atte_ urchaee f this operty, e parks ivisien s all, 13 throug its norm 1 mae lamming process, eek to 14 rovide ccess to he site, including parking, for coun 15 sidents who live eyond t immedia e adjoini g 16 n ghbarho 17 ree For.. Additi is mu ti -parte Lnholdi a within he 19 cc ty's Th ee Fork Park ala Reiniq oad nea`z�� Snoaualm'e. 19 The ounty s 11 seek to acgui as man of the i elve oar is 20 as p Bible, th the ghest prlerity be a the p coerty al no 21 the we tern edg of the roject bct1ndaryI jacent the 22 rack;+a marsh a a. -\ 23 ❑p r Hear reek Co\tfservatio Area is multi- aoertyoject 24 are 'dithin hick ac\ isI 'n [ fee 3 ' 1e and ass thaNfee ZS Bevel p`\ent r hts wil_ be pur aced forcanseria 'an pure ses. 25 Solz1 on Ilion: e coun shall s k to ac u+r= 27 dove convent arCv..tnd Para Ise Lake nd ac to thi 29 lake - a fir priority for acuisittor, the i� ntified 29 projec area. JO Seccn Priorit• shall accuisi ion oftie farmer "Whitel k" 31 orocer1 any r aoerty cquisiti s bevo ' these t' priori v 32 reas sh 11 be re sewed aid approv by th COC and c unty 33 until. 34 J5 Lak 9a �jer s a 29.5 creua rfrant oject _ c_tzd on e 36 sout., ast sho of Lak Sawyer n south :int Cou t_i. The 37 county hall s k to acq ire pra ec`y tha provid public 73 access the wa erfront d the ocased een to adar 39 reaiona1 rail. -- 40 9UBORB N CI-IH9 PRCJHCT9 41 Green River Access is a 4.4 -acre project with aooroximato_ly 610 42 feet of shoreline located adjacent to 4th Street Southeast on 43 the Green River in the _City of Auburn. 44 Special Condition:- The city shall seek to acquire as much 45 of the proposed project as possible, with a first priority 45 of gaining public access from the street end at the 47 northern project boundary. 48 Olson canyon is a 60.5 -acre project adjacent to the north end 49 of Auburn Golf'Course on Green River Road. 50 special Condition: The City Of Auburn shall ensure 51 preservation of the historic character of the site, 52 Including the homestead and barn buildings, in conjunction 51 with agency or other recognized historic preservation/ 54 cultural resources authorities. 55 Heydenbauer Hay is a 4/10 of an acre site located on the 56 shoreline of Lake Washington on Southeast Bellevue Place in the 57 City of Bellevue. 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 LO 11 12 13 14 15 15 17 13 to 20 21 22 27 24 25 25 27 23 29 30 3i 32 33 74 35 36 37 is 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 43 49 50 51 52 53 Bammamish River/Burka-Gilmaa Greenway (Bothell portion) is a 26.1 -acre open space adjacent to the Burke Gilman Regional Trail and the Sammamish Slough on Bcthell Way in Bothell. The project will purchase development rights an a portion of tate "front nine,' of the Wayne Galt Course, and will require continued public availability to the golf course at prices equivalent to publicly -armed golf courses in King county. Special Condition: The City of Bothell shall ensure that the vegetation between the Burke Gilman Trail and the golf course is regularly pruned to ensure clear visibility to trail users of the open space Pram t_he entire length of the trail bordering the open space. Dougherty Fars is a 21.6 -acre poen space in the Sncqualmie Valley located on Northeast Cherry valley Road just north of the present city limits of the City of Duvall. sisters of 71sitation is an 11.7 -acre site With aooroximat=_ly 605 feet of shoreline on Puget Sound. The site is located on Marine lieu Drive in Federal Way. Special Condition: The portion of this site that contains the footprint of the existing building that will be used as a conference center is not eligible for CFT funding. Further, the City of Federal Way will ensure that the general public will have full, well -identified access to the grounds that are curchased with these ccnservatian futures funds and that this orcoerty will not be for the exclusive use of any conference attendees or other users of the building located at the site. :isher's Pond is a 17.5 -arra project located on southwest 320th Street and 7th Avenue Southwest i.. Federal Way. school Site Na. 20 is a 10.1 -acre project located on 15th .avenue Southeast in Federal Way. Tibbett Property is an 13 -acre site that _les at the entrance tp Issacuah's Tradition Lake Park and the '"icer Mountain Stat=_ Forest. The site is adjacent to Interstate 90 west of the High Point exit east of Issaquah. Special Candition: It is anticipat=_d that funding shortfalls in this project will be addressed by t.e State. .'ohnson Property is a 3.4 -acre property located in downtown Issaquah at the junction of the East Fcr'; and main, stem of Issaquah. Creek. Green Riser NREA is an approximately 270 -acre site located adjacent to the Green River, south of South 212th Str=_et, and adjacent to a proposed stormwater management and wetland enhancement basin facility currently owned by the City of Fent. Upper Hill Creek Canyon is two parcels of land totalinc acres that are inholdings within Kent's Mill Creek Park. Riverview Park is a 11.3 acre project located along the east bank of the Green River, adjacent to SR 167 in Kent. Soecial Condition: As a first priority, the City shall seek to acquire prooerty between Hawley Road and the Green River, known as the "Baldwin" property. As a second priority, the City shall seek to acquire the parcels located between Hawley Road and SR 167. 1 2 7 4 8 9 10 11 12 17 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 27 24 25 26 27 28 29 70 71 72 J7 74 75 76 77 38 79 40 41 42 47 44 45 46 47 48 49 5C 5L 52 53 -L-LQUO 7uanita Hap Park Expansion is a 1•3 -acre parcel with 240 feet of shoreline on Lake Washington and is located to the north of existinq Juanita say Park on 981th Avenue Nort-beast in Kirkland. Brink Park E-span�iea is a .7 -acre site located on Lake Washington adjacent to the south end of Brink Park on Market Street in Kirkland. Soecial condition: If state IAC funding is secured for this project, unanticipated CFT funding surplus shall be reprogrammed punleE�Dansion projectlete identifiedthe �abg�e. Juanita Bay HcAleer c=eek Open space Program is a 1.1 -acre parcel located on Perkins Way in the City of Lake Forest Park. The project contains shoreline along McAleer Creek. Headowbrgok Farm is a 470 -acre farm located within the cities of North Bend and Snoqualmie on the Sncaualmie-North Bend Road and along the South fork of the Snoqualmie RiverThe cites gP North Bend and Snoqualmie shall seek to acquire the properties identified as "Phase I=" on the attached map. amtuamish Waterfront park is a multi-oarcel project with Laka 6 Laka S imately 2500 feet of. shoreline an Lake sammamish and is acorlocated along East Lake sammamish parkway. This property is locata_d within unincorporated King County, however, it would be owned and operated by the City of Redmond. cpe-ia Cond{t!on: The City of Redmond shall aggressively sources of funding to comolete this project. pursue other is a City of Renton project that is Cedar River "-'-ail 51.6 acres in site and is lccated along tae Cedar River and Cedar River Regional Trail east gf Interstate 405 in Renton. Special Condition: The City of Renton w411 preserve at least half of the level area in the Yenter o f the site for ns open space uses consistent with the identified in ordinance 10750. Any portion Of this project site that is proposed for ac,:lve recreation or other activities not in keeping with the funding recuirements of the RecionaL Conser!ation Futures 1997 will not be eligible for funding. Acquisition Band Program 8pringbrcok creek Trail is an located on Talbot Road and the Roodinvilie Green Gateway is a 3.7 -acre project located in the City of Woodinville adjacent to the sammamish Valley/Burke- ciLman Regional Trail, which is on the sammamish River. The Street - project is located on 171st Avenue HE and HE 175th Street. Specioject al Conditicn: The City shall seek to secure the necessary funds to acquire the entre prop°ofdWoodlnville area. Upon purchase of this si`e t,.e C_t7 pn the will change the configuration o existing Parking site to be no more than 15k of the entire site. Should the City be successful in acquiring the school distiL�hin ct r poperty located t° the easoC°thiseMotion ' thee eCity gf three years of the oassag_ eliminate all parking from the site in Wocdinville will perpetuity. 8.8 -acre City of Renton traject West Valley Highway (SR 167). 2 7 ' 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 20 2L 22 23 24 25 25 27 28 29 30 7L 72 77 74 75 36 77 38 39 40 41 42 a3 a4 45 46 47 48 4o 50 51 IIun0 ITY Cy SEATTLE PR4SECT9 forth Beach Natural Arna is a 1.19 -acre project that inlocated cludes farthwest 91st Place and Northwest 95th place that incl :reek within a wooded ravine• greenbe Sunset Hill Greenbelt is a 27.3 -acre lt Bay Htlararina. along ieaview Avenue northwest adjacent to Shilshole B Phorntcn Creek watershed consists of three sites: a 1.73 -acre project Located at tate Sand Point Hay Northeast and Nort-neast Sand Point Aay, intersection of 95th street; a 7.14 -acre multi -Parcel project with Little Hroek is Little 1000 feet of stream and a wooded ravine. T1s project is located between NO rtherst 117th Street and tIcrtheast 120th Street; Hap1e Creak is a 4.54 -acre wooded open space along Thornton Creek located east of 40th Avenue Northeast and Northeast eat.1 Street. s: d tiw 5 tta 145th is Llandover weed3ra 9.54 -acre wooded and grassy site located just south of the northerly limits grassy meaat Northwest 143rd Street near Northwest culbertsen Seattle mea Drive. 14043 32nd NE is a .86-3cre ParceL located on 32nd Avenue tfo rt`least bet'aeen Ifortheast 143rd �doueandra small street. Stream. street. The pro contains a mea scree t. Theecc r a .2 -acre ur.develcoed property located between -renonIfo rt'.lwest 75th Street and tfcrth Canal street• City is encouraged to exnLere Special C-ndLtien: The Ci ccmmun--r re Poen space =_icesdithiit the Fremont aiternati' uirin this prcaert^ before acq 4 Burke -Gilman Greenway: 9%-p Gilman Claud is a .5 -acre un deve'_cced the 3ur..e Gilman Trail near 27..1 Avenue t to y f the area adjacent rcPosed as z lacat'cn for northeast. mhe site is also p day lightino of Ravenna Creek, which currently runs through a drainage pipe on the property the city shall C^rd tion: As a first cricr,e! e of the Saecia —_d--- elan 1 eastern edge seek to acquire the property 9 project boundary. of Seattle ownership• In Burke -Gilman Greenway: DNR is a 3.12 -acre section of the Sure Gilman Trail that is not in City addition to the trail, the property contains a natural buffer to the trail• west oCte is sand Pointed east of 40th ,4av tlortheast. Avenue northeast and Burke Gilman Graenxay: Northeast 8? and Sand Paint way is a 7.7 acre wooded ravine property located adjacentGth SheeB�rke Gilman Trai'_ near Sand point way and Northeast 8..� en space an the east and nor'` 8t. Y.ark's Greenbelt Ls an 8.7 -acre woods OP en side of Capital Hill south of Broadway East Highland Drive. HagnoLia Greenbelt is a .51 -acre wooded hillis side nearthe th Hacnolia viaduct at Amherst AvenuubLicwestand ownershiPart o the larger Magnolia Greenbe_t under p 1 2 7 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 15 17 18 1a 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 29 29 70 J' L 72 77 74 35 36 77 78 39 40 41 42 47 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 IIkiU(:) Had is on Hcail=a is a 7.88 acre multi -parcel project. The project area borders Lake Rashington at the entrance to the Mantlake cut at East McGilvra Street, east of 77th Avenue East. Special Condition: The City shall seek to acquire as many of the parcels as possible, with highest priority being acquisition of public waterfront access. The city shall aggressively pursue other sources of funding, including city resources, to complete this project. Northeast Queen Anna Greembelt Tip is a .5 --acre parcel that serves as a northern terminus to the Northeast Queen Anne Greenbelt. The site is _located between Dexter Avenue and 4th Avenue North. HGH Eastlake is a .51 -acre project with a view of Lake Union and a serves as an addition to an Olmstead Park and a P-Patc The project is located west of Eastlake Avenue East. 3001 East Madison is a .28-acrewooded sloping hillside in Madison Valley of Central Seattle and is located at the intersection of East Madison Street and East Mercer Street. Northeast Queen Anne overlook is a .68 -acre open space property that provides a panoramic view east over Lake Union and the Cascades, Lake Washington and Haunt Rainier. The project is lccal_d at the intersection of Blaine Street and Taylor Avenue Ncrth. Duvamish Head Greenbelt is a 5.25 -acre project on the east [acing sLooe of the Duwamish River. Priority accuisition properties are located on Fauntlercv Avenue Southwest just east of Admiral Way. A second oriority accuisition site is located adjacent to Lotus Avenue and Harbor Avenue Scut.;west. Scec;al Condition: The City's highest acquisition priority shall be parcels "5", "C" and "D" on the attached Mao. If additional funds are available, oarce's Di, D2, D3 and E7 will be the second priority for acquisition. PeLly ?Lace natural Asea is a .29 -acre project Lccated east of Murray Avenue southwest at the entrance to a larger wooded ravine. Arroyos Natural Ares is a 6.35 -acre wooded hillside site above Puget Sound along Marine View Drive in scut: Seattle. Maple School Ravine Natural Area is a 2.19 -acre multi -parcel linear wooded greenbelt located adjacent to 19th Avenue South between South Lucille Street and South Juneau Street. Grchar^_ Street Ravine Natural Area is a 1.51 -ac -e project consisting of 2 parcels that are part of a shallow, undeveloped, wooded ravine adjacent to Southwest orchard Street. Puget Creek Natural Area is a 4.69 -acre multi -parcel Project located adjacent to 19th Avenue Southwest between Southwest Brandon Street and Southwest Juneau Street. The natural area contains or borders a creek that is linked to Puget Parc. _ C[TV =F =i p7 fj- [c c:lf �r f1AP IDF.NT1FYiNG: P URCHASE PHASES WEl-L L0CAT10N-S r ,, C)o c) b C cfl'-_F A KrI LECA' YRT �EYJ D U PARCEL.' CFi IHTFRtnCA1. - YBAr !! EE hl. �a�clunenl Lt L'a yc 1 �1 y k w• O P 2 1� N P H Y C v U O b 2 N y{ N •r ° 69 V n 00 O M? o A u . a !o• . u Y N IUJ y, `-� • 1 O p O O O O O O O S O- - o e a c c. O ' o Jo 0 0 o a J o o Jo ° o pp o � o O J a n O O v o o q O o 0 oo c o a L 1e to v .e w P tl 1 c � q y 4 O r ro o q o j o O o o j 1 A o u O O n yy = O 4 _ L 0 o S y T1 p o _ W 1y9' y � vT u mO J I V li rn 0 o j " o N �I I � I y A � 5 p r �r �e y ~ 11 T m o n .` o: o e° oao oe o a° o o a° o °e c o o c n 'n o o e o J o 0 0° o 0 0 0 0 op o° °e a °o ' e n o e o' 0 0 0 o a u o 23 DECEMBER 29, 1993 �z 4 r n p ✓ i+ Y N ✓ 8 �� � N N N � N N N • `^ 0 u u0 o N � o o r Q N p O •` O O O O acl G `O V p D O O O J O O U ✓ G � � N L N b W O O tl O p O a N N O q a o c o n n - n ✓ t- v5 c c o 0 0 0 18�31 lj fI It o - � a 0 0 0 o c cn o y a f C t` O f itC l O J c �C a X G r.. N `o N p tl O �A II n I� u ' la N ✓ � fI O O O O O O O N O O w O O O O e u O O O D Y • O .. O.` N O O - �. P D O D O I• pp O o o O O O D U O O O O O O U O O O U O narpnnFa ?n. ,�n [FT IHTFRI rrA1 - CFII' ATTACHMENT C ADDITIONAL SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1. No more than $977,000 in general administrative costs (including all negotiation, general management and indirect expenses) may be reimbursed from Project Funds allocated to the City of Seattle. Administrative costs attributable to King County's oversight of the project, however, may be reimbursed from such project funds. 2. No more than the general administrative costs (including all negotiation, general management and indirect expenses) identified in individual project applications may be reimbursed from suburban Project Funds as follows: Administrative costs attributable to King County's oversight of the project, however, may be reimbursed from such project funds. 3. Seattle may reprogram funds from its regional or local unprogrammed funding projects to other projects funded in this agreement after reporting such reprogramming to the Committee and the County Council. CFT INTERLOCAL - KENT 25 DECEMBER 29, 1993 Administrative City Project Costs Auburn Green River Access $ -0- Auburn Olson Canyon -0- Bellevue Meydenbauer Bay 301000 Bothell Burke Gilman/Sammamish River Greenway 8,000 Duvall Dougherty Farm 5,000 Federal Way Sisters of Visitation 30,000 Federal Way Fisher's Pond and 55,000 School Site No. 20 Issaquah Tibbott Property (Tiger Mountain) 51000 Issaquah Issaquah Creek - Johnson Property 51000 Kent Green River NREA -0- Kent Upper Mill Creek Canyon 2,000 Kent Riverview Park -0- Kirkland Juanita Bay Park Expansion -0- Kirkland Brink Park Expansion -0- L.Forest Pk McAleer Creek OS Program -0- North Bend/ Meadowbrook Farm -0- Snoqualmie Redmond E. Lake Sammamish Waterfront Pk. 20,000 Renton Cedar River Trail 25,000 Renton Springbrook Trail 181000 Woodinville Woodinville Green Gateway 1,440 Administrative costs attributable to King County's oversight of the project, however, may be reimbursed from such project funds. 3. Seattle may reprogram funds from its regional or local unprogrammed funding projects to other projects funded in this agreement after reporting such reprogramming to the Committee and the County Council. CFT INTERLOCAL - KENT 25 DECEMBER 29, 1993 4. Prior to disbursement of any shall negotiate in good faith for the King County to complete its 1989 King its projects under the Program. The Shoreline Interurban Trail (City Light Right -of -Way) Project Funds hereunder, Seattle conveyance of property needed by County open Space Bond Project or projects include: Soos Creek Trail Extension North (Seattle Water Department Right -of -Way) King County also agrees to negotiate the conveyance of properties King County owns that the City needs to complete its projects under the 1989 King County Open Space Bond Project or its projects under the Program. 5. Suburban Cities shall provide matching funds to each project as follows: City Auburn Auburn Bellevue Bothell Duvall Federal Way Federal Way Issaquah Issaquah Kent Kent Kent Kirkland Kirkland L.Forest Pk North Bend/ Snoqualmie Redmond Renton Renton Woodinville Proiect Matching Funds Green River Access $ -0- Olson Canyon -0- Meydenbauer Bay 500,000 Burke Gilman/Sammamish -0- River Greenway Dougherty Farm 82,000 Sisters of Visitation 405,000 Fisher's Pond and -0- School Site No. 20 Tibbott Property (Tiger Mountain) -0- Issaquah Creek - Johnson Property -0- Green River NREA 31400,000 Upper Mill Creek Canyon 73,500 Riverview Park -0- Juanita Bay Park Expansion 530,000* Brink Park Expansion 225,000 McAleer Creek OS Program -0- Meadowbrook Farm -0- E. Lake Sammamish Waterfront Pk. -0- Cedar River Trail 702,249 Springbrook Trail 65,388 Woodinville Green Gateway -0- * Includes METRO SIF 6. Snoqualmie and North Bend shall be jointly and severally liable for performing of City obligations under their agreement with King County. CFT INTERLOCAL - KENT 26 DECEMBER 29, 1993 Stone Pine East Sewer Extension Committee unanimously recommended bill of sale be accepted and bonds released after the one year maintenance period. Robinson Sewer Extension Committee unanimously recommended bill of sale be accepted and bonds released after the one year maintenance period. Conservation Futures Grants Wickstrom stated that this is a contract where the City will get approximately $800,00 for three parcels, and one is $500,000 for the Lagoon acquisition. He said Parks has one near the newspaper office and one at the upper end of Mill Creek at 104th & 267th. He said the Parks Committee has already approved their two parcels and we wanted to make sure that when this agreement came before Council, that the $500,000 would be included which would eliminate coming back to Committee. Brubaker stated that he has reviewed the contract and recommended some changes in the Indemnification. Brubaker feels he will be successful in getting the County to look at it a little differently but right now the way the Indemnification is written, it is called a sole negligence standard" where basically unless County is solely responsible for damages arising from this contract, we are to indemnify the County to pay for 100% of the damages. He said in other words, if there is a claim arising from this contract against both the County and the City, and a jury finds that the County is 90% responsible for the damages and we are only 10% responsible, we still pay 100%. Brubaker said only in those instances where the jury finds the County 100% responsible do they agree to pay for the damages. Brubaker said he is trying to get them to agree to a straight forward comparative negligent standard. Committee unanimously recommended authorization for the Mayor to sign the agreement, dependent on the City Attorney concurring with the County on the change in the indemnification language. Meeting adjourned at 6:30 P.M. 5 Kent City Council Meeting Date January 18 1994 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: CEDAR MEADOWS FINAL PLAT (FSU -90-4) 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Authorization to set February 11 1994, as the date for a public meeting to consider Cedar Meadows final plat map. The property is located at SE 228th Place and 116th Avenue SE. 3. EXHIBITS: None 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Hearing Examiner (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT_ NO YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember DISCUSSION: ACTION: oves, Councilmember econds Council Agenda Item No. 3Q Kent City Council Meeting Date January 18 1994 Category Other Business 1. SUBJECT: LID 343 - STREET (SEQUOIA SIDEWALKS)P- RESOLUTION VEMENTS ON 111TH AVENUE SE 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: The Public Works Committee has recommended adoption of a resolution setting February 15th as the public hearing date for LID 343 Street Improvements on 111th Avenue SE from Kent-Kangley Road to Sequoia Junior High School. 3. EXHIBITS: Public Works Director memorandum, Public Works minutes, resolution and vicinity map 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember - seconas to adopt Resolution No. 'setting February 15, 1994, as the public hearing date on LID 343. DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 4A DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS December 6, 1993 TO: Mayor White & City Council FROM: Don Wickstrom, Director of Public Works RE: LID 343 - 111th Ave SE Street Improvements (Kent-Kangley Rd. to Sequoia Jr. High) BACKGROUND eceived a request for the installation of The City of Kent has r SE leading to Sequoia Junior High School. sidewalk on 111th Ave rks Committee has directed staff to proceed The Council's Public Wo with the formation of a Local Improvement District (LID) for the construction and financing of the necessary street improvements and sidewalks. A property owner meeting was held July 28, 1993 to discuss the proposal. The City is proposing to fund a portion of the project cost with the remaining funds being provided by the formation of Local Improvement District (LID). Therefore, Resolution No. was adopted by City Council on January 4, 1994 establishing February 1, 1994 for the public hearing on the formation of LID 343. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS The project consists of upgrading the roadway to City Standards including the following features: 1. 36 feet wide road curb to curb (pavement widening as necessary). 2. Curb and gutter. 3. Sidewalks both sides adjacent to curb (6.5 wide cement concrete). 4. Drainage improvements. 5. Relocation of utilities and other improvements as required. 6. Asphalt overlay of existing pavement. 7. Channelization and signing. 8. Driveways constructed in the curb and sidewalk at existing driveways. 9. Street lighting on power poles. PROJECT FUNDING The total estimated cost for the construction of the proposed project including engineering, survey, construction inspection and LID costs and associated bonding costs is $141,512.14. This figure also includes a l0% construction contingency factor. o fund 30% of the project total which based The City is proposing t on the cost estate is $39,13 estimate 8.00. The balance of $91,322.00ssociated costs are shall be funded the LID. LID bonding and a estimated at $11,052.14. This gives an LID assessment total of $102,374.14. ASSESSMENT METHOD The LID cost is distributed to the properties located on this section of 111th Avenue based on front footage along the roadway. Most of the properties are obligated by covenant to install the improvements across their frontage. Without and LID, each property would be faced with the cost of half of the street for the length of the property. Therefore with the LID, the front footage method gives a similar cost distribution. NEED FOR IMPROVEMENT The properties adjacent to the project are zoned office. Also a school is located at the end of 111th Ave SE. As such, substantial pedestrian traffic is generated. City Standards therefore require that City streets such as this, have sidewalks to address the pedestrian traffic. Sidewalks and other street improvements are required to bring 111th Avenue up to current City Standards. This need has been recognized for many years. Various properties within the LID have been required to execute no protest LID covenants for street improvements including sidewalks upon obtaining various development permits. Currently there are covenants representing 79.70% of the LID which includes 5 of the 6 properties involved. SUPPORT FOR LID As stated above, property owners representing 70.70% of the LID assessments are committed to this LID via LID no protest covenants. Since it takes only 40% support to allow an LID to be formed, Council thus has the option of proceeding with the project based on the covenants. 2 ENVIRONMENTAL The Engineering Department has received a determination of non- significance from the Planning Department. PAYMENT OF ASSESSMENT upon council passing, the ordinance confirming the final assessment roll (after completion of the construction), there is a 30 -day rtion or all of the assessment can be paid period in which any po the 30 -day period, the balance is without interest charges. After paid over a ten year period wherein each year's payment is 1/10th of the principal plus interest on the unpaid balance. The interest will be what the market dictates. T1964 3 CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, declaring its intention to order street improvements on 111th Avenue SE from Kent-Kangley Road to Sequoia Junior High School and to create a local improvement district to assess a part of the cost and expense of carrying out those improvements against the properties specially benefited thereby, and notifying all persons who desire to object to the improvements to appear and present their objections at a hearing before the City Council to be held on February 15, 1994. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, as follows: Section 1. It is the intention of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, to order the improvement of the properties within the area described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof, by the construction of street improvements on 111th Avenue SE from Kent-Kangley Road to Sequoia Junior High School as described in Exhibit B, attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. All of the foregoing improvements shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications therefor prepared by the Director of Public Works of the City and may be modified by the City as long as that modification does not affect the purpose of the improvements. Section 2. The total estimated cost and expense of the improvements is declared to be $141,512.14 and approximately $102,374.14 of that cost and expense shall be borne by and assessed against the property specially benefited by the improvements to be included in a local improvement district to be established 0110319.01 -1- embracing as nearly as practicable all the property specially benefited by the improvements. Actual assessments may vary from estimated assessments as long as they do not exceed a figure equal to the increased true and fair value the improvements add to the property. Section 3. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to give notice of the adoption of this resolution and of the date, time and place fixed for the public hearing to each owner or reputed owner of any lot, tract, parcel of land or other property within the proposed local improvement district by mailing such notice at least 15 days before the date fixed for public hearing to the owner or reputed owner of the property as shown on the rolls of the King County Assessor at the address shown thereon, as required by law. This resolution also shall be published in at least two consecutive issues of the official newspaper of the City, the date of the first publication to be at least 15 days prior to the date fixed for the public hearing. Section 4. All persons who may desire to comment in support of or object to the improvements are notified to appear and present those comments or objections at a hearing before the City Council to be held in the Council Chambers in the City Hall in Kent, Washington, at 7:00 p.m. on February 15, 1994, which time and place o are fixed for hearing all matters relating to the improvements and all comments thereon or objections thereto and for determining the method of payment for the improvements. All persons who may desire to comment thereon or object thereto should appear and present their comments or objections at that hearing. Any person who may -2- 0110319.01 desire to file a written protest with the City Council may do so within 30 days after the date of passage of the ordinance ordering the improvements in the event the local improvement district is formed. The written protest should be signed by the property owner and should include the legal description of the property for which the protest is filed and that protest should be delivered to the City Clerk. Section 5. The City's Director of Public Works is directed to submit to the City Council on or prior to February 11 1994, all data and information required by law to be submitted. Passed at a regular open public meeting by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, this 18th day of January, 1994. Concurred in by the Mayor of the City of Kent this day of January, 1994. MAYOR ATTEST: BRENDA JA OBER, CITY CLERK fAPPROVED AS TO FORM: FOSTER PEPPER & SHEFELMAN Special Counsel and Bond Counsel 0110319.01 -3 EXHIBIT A 10/27/93 LID 343 PRELIMINARY BOUNDARY LEGAL DESCRIPTION 111TH AVENUE SE STREET IMPROVEMENT Unrecorded plat of part of Section 29, Township 22 North, Range 5 East Lot 3 City of Kent Short Plat 81-2 Recording #8202170734 said Short Plat described as follows. Portion of west half of northeast quarter of Section 29, Township 22 North, Range 5 East described as follows. Beginning at the southwest corner of said subdivision; thence North 89°42100" East on the south line thereof 330 feet; thence North 02008149" West parallel with the west line 1169.45 feet; thence *forth 87024116" East 437.92 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence continuing North 87°24116" East to the west margin of 110th Ave SE described under auditor's file 15831772; thence North 01025145" West on said west margin 306.71 feet more or less to the southwest margin SSH 15-A; thence northwesterly on said southwesterly margin to a point North 02035144" West of the True Point of Beginning; thence South 02035144" East 376.70 feet to the True Point of Beginning less portions conveyed to Street Recording Nos. 8001020446 and 8001020447 - also known as portion of SPC 82-2 AND; Unrecorded plat a part of Section 29 Township 22 North, Range 5 East, Lot 2 City of Kent Short Plat 81-2 Recording #8202170734, said Short Plat described as follows; A portion of the west half of the northeast quarter of Section 29 Township 22 North, Range 5 East, described as follows; Beginning at the southwest corner of said subdivision; thence North 89042100" East on the south line thereof 330 feet; thence North 0200814911 West parallel with the west line 1169.45 feet; thence North 87024116" East 437.92 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence continuing North 87°24116" East to the west margin of 110th Ave SE described under Auditor's File 15831772; thence North 01025145" West on said west margin 306.71 feet more or less to the southwest margin of SSH 05-A; thence northwesterly on said southwesterly margin to a point North 01035144" West of the True Point of Beginning; ON 76.70 to True thence South 02°35o�Eastconve ed to street he Record ng n Nos. less p ony portion of SPC 82-2 AND 8001020446 and 8001020447, also known as p ALSO; Unrecorded plat of part of Section 29 Township 22 North, Range 5 East, Lot 1 City of Kent Short Plat 81-2 Recording 18202170734, said Short Plat described as follows; Portion of west half fnortheast quarter of Section 29 Township 22 North, Range 5 East, Beginning at the southwest corner of said subdivision;330 . thence North 89°42'00" East onthe with the th line hereofwest line feet; 5 thence North 02008149" West parallel feet; thence North 87°24'16" East 437.92 feet to the True Point o Beginning; thence continuing North 87024'16" East to the west margin of 110t Ave SE described under Auditor's File 15831772; thence North 01025145" West on said west margin 306.71 feet more or less to the southwest margin of SSH 15-A; thence northwesterly on said southwesterly margin to a point North 02°35'44" West of the True Point of Beginning; thence South 02035144" East 376.70 feet to the True Point of diBeginning less portions conveyed to Street rtion er Recor SPC 82 2NAND 8001020446 and 8001020447 - also known as p ALSO; Unrecorded plat of a part of Section 29 Township 22 North, Range 5 East, portion of west half of the northeast quarter of Section 29 Township 22 North, Range 5 East, Beginning at the southwest corner of said su s id subdivision 330 thence North 89043100"East along south feet; with west line 1169.45 feet to thence North 02°08'49" West parallel the True Point of Beginning; thence North 87024116" East 571.15 feet to the west margin of 110th Ave SE; thence South 01202514511 East along said west margin 414.42 fee more or less; thence South 89042100" West 566.11 feet to the east line of the west 330 feet of the west half of the west half of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter; the thence North 02°08'49" West 402.21 feet ortion ofLots1 nand 2 Beginning - portion taxable also known as p Range of unrecorded plat of paRan rt of Section 29, Township 22 North, 5 East, AND ALSO; 2 Unrecorded plat of part of Section 29 Township 22 North, Range 5 East, portion of west half of the northeast quarter of Section 29 Township 22 North, Range 5 East, beginning at the southwest corner of said subdivision; thence North 89°43' 00" East along south line of said subdivision 330 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence continuing North 89042'00" East bdivi ion South line 956.49 feet to the southeast cor^er of said thence North 01°25'45" West along easterly line thereof 1132 feet; thence South 89051149" West 340 feet; thence South 01025145" East parallel to the east line of said subdivision 366 feet;parallel to the south line of said thence South 89042100" West p subdivision 626.12 feet; arallel to the west line of thence South 02008149" East along line p said subdivision 767.22 feet to the True Point of Beginning, also known as portion of Lots 1e 5 of un ecordedAND plat of part Section 29, Township 22 North, g Unrecorded plat of part of Section 29 Township 22 North, Range 5 East, portion beginning at a point 1132 feet North and South 89051149" Section West 220 feet from the southeast corner of Lot 3; thence South 89051149" West 120 feet; thence North 0102514511 West8 id soutine herly point1n of North 5°48 411" East thence southeasterly along to beginning;less County roads. thence South 05°48'41" West to beginning, 111th 3 EXHIBIT B LID 343 111th Ave SE Street Improvement (Kent-Kangley Road to Sequoia Jr. High) Road Improvement Descri�on The project consists of upgrading the roadway to City Standards including the following features: 1. 36 feet wide road curb to curb (pavement widening as necessary). 2. Curb and gutter. 3. Sidewalks both sides adjacent to curb (6.5 wide cement concrete). 4. Drainage improvements. 5. Relocation of utilities and other improvements as required. pavement. 6. Asphalt overlay of existing p 7. Channelization and signing. g. Driveways constructed in the curb and sidewalk at existing driveways. 9. Street lighting on power poles. e I, BRENDA JACOBER, City Clerk of the City of Kent, Washington, certify that the attached copy of Resolution No. is a true and correct copy of the original resolution adopted on the 18th day of January, 1994, as that resolution appears on the Minute Book of the City. DATED this day of January, 1994. Brenda Jacober, City Clerk 0110319.01 SE 246THI ST x 0 o o SE 248TH ST Lu w cr 52ND ST CD 0 7P,K SE .1 255TH SE 260TH ST N E 264TH i V 1 ' J PL 1 .vwi ��... i 5 267TH ST o . 268TH O 1' I SE 2715Tl.ST w SE 251ST ST;' S 'L v7 252ND PL' ' o t. 3 F D -t w >¢ w '¢ 254TH PL :PL SE .1 255TH SE 260TH ST N E 264TH i V 1 ' J PL 1 .vwi ��... i 5 267TH ST o . 268TH O 1' I SE 2715Tl.ST w V7 w 4E, co SE 271ST 7 SE� 2665E 497TH PLSE 2661STse zSarH 5t H Sp H ST VICINITY MAP L.I.D. 343 -111TH AVE. STREET IMPROVEMEN (KENT-KANGLEY RD. TO SEQUOIA JR. HIGH) SE 274TH ST —� 274TH ST w SE 251ST ST;' W . _ v7 252ND PL' ' w ¢ w >¢ w '¢ 254TH :PL STl _ SE 2567E PROJECT LOCATION ` SR '.` w _.. i .SE �•,. _ 259TH a Z SE`260TH PL A w cr C,j � 'N �NZ •�o u SCHOOL 1' - ¢ w V7 w 4E, co SE 271ST 7 SE� 2665E 497TH PLSE 2661STse zSarH 5t H Sp H ST VICINITY MAP L.I.D. 343 -111TH AVE. STREET IMPROVEMEN (KENT-KANGLEY RD. TO SEQUOIA JR. HIGH) SE 274TH ST —� 274TH ST JUNE 30. 1993 -r�ff•ff C`t `2-`N�1'JI IG t :9=:1191 Ji i I 1 ' I f••II j 25 ' r oa�o.arnu \- L.I.D.BOUNDARY B83/ e93c.c == Z21 -7x=2 �FYI trfrtYttYiY171:Yllr �: � s.l l Wl i L1111�11�� \::.,E-- PROJECT -------, j LOCATION w r !C:91iJ w 4 � w _ ez r r ; r r T 3 r w T r L.I.D. ASSESSMENT NUMBER T - - 1 w r r � r r %1 r r r TAX LOT NUMBER � r r r r T r r � r r r L.I.D. COVENANT r r r . ee=yT�� 9ta: w r r r =r w r ttttH tHtti tF#FFf �tHtttit t f I tktHi 1tt411 HY f t t ttll i trill trlYtt ttlttttflfY• __--__-- ____�__—__-,1.�ttttH PROPOSED L.I.D. 111TH AVE. STREET IMPROVEMENT (KENT-KANGLEY ROAD TO SEQUOIA JR. HIGH) JUNE 30. 1993 PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE OCTOBER 13, 1993 PRESENT: Jim White Jim Bennett Don Wickstrom Gary Gill Ed White Roger Lubovich Tom Brubaker Robyn Bartelt Mr & Mrs Rust Steve Caputo ABSENT: Committee Member Paul Mann Kingsport Industrial 196th Middle Leq Condemnation Ordinance Wickstrom said that we have been negotiating with the property owners for several years. The property is located on the west side of the Burlington Northern tracks, east of Western Processing. Wickstrom said that we may need to condemn in order to obtain it. In response to Bennett, Wickstrom said it is not finalized at this point due to money and the property owner wants zoning changes. He explained that the zoning changes would give the owner more flexibility on the use of his site however, this is not within our control. Brubaker said that we hoped that we could negotiate a reasonable dollar figure to purchase this but at the same time, if we are unable to do so, because of the zoning and dollar issues, we want to start on the condemnation, as the property owner is well aware. Brubaker stated that we are requesting authority to begin the condemnation process which begins with an ordinance, 30 days later the ordinance becomes effective and we file the condemnation action. In response to White, Brubaker stated that it will also provide a tax benefit to the property owner however, the owner would be exempt from a excise tax payment either way. Committee unanimously recommended adoption of an ordinance authorizing the City to proceed with condemnation at Kingsport Industrial on 196th Corridor, Middle Leg. Sidewalks at Sequoia Jr. High School Wickstrom stated that we developed an estimate and met with the various property owners and they were basically negative however, the school is not going to protest but they will not firmly support this either. He said that the school's intent was originally to put in an asphalt sidewalk. Under the covenant, the school will have to replace this with a full half -street improvement and 1 N essentially will be throwing away money. Wickstrom said that since we have almost 80% in covenants we should do the improvements. Bennett feels that if all they were asking for was to asphalt along one side, and there was so much negative response, Bennett feels the timing is off and there should be a better time to do this. Wickstrom said that we are proposing to pay 30% (approximately $39,000) and our out-of-pocket cost for the asphalt would be about $10 -$12 thousand dollars. White said that this was originally started by the school P.T.A. and students. Wickstrom said that in his experience, there is never a good economic time for an LID. committee unanimously agreed to authorize staff to proceed with the formation of an LID. Kent City Council Meeting Date January 18 1994 Category Other Business 1. SUBJECT: APPOINTMENTS TO KENT TRANSIT ADVISORY BOARD 2. SUMMARYSTATEMENT: Mayor White has appointed Jay Bakst, Janette Nuss and Russ Stringham to serve as members of the Kent Transit Advisory Board. Mr. Bakst is owner/principal of Technologies Service Group located in Renton and is a member of the Kent Chamber of Commerce. He will replace Sherilyn Jordan, who resigned, and his term will be effective until 4/30/95. Ms. Nuss is a member of the Kent Planning Commission and has been active in community affairs. She will replace Randy Judkins, who has resigned and her term will be effective until 4/30/95. Mr. Stringham is a Kent business owner and is vitally interested in Kent's future. He will replace Gordon Parke, who resigned, and his term will be effective until 4/30/94. 3. EXHIBITS: Memorandum from Mayor White 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Mayor White (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT_ NO > YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember r' moves, counciimemQeL I- to confirm the Mayor's appointment of Jay Bakst, Janette Nuss and Russ Stringham to the Kent Transit Advisory Board. DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 4B MEMORANDUM TO: JUDY WOODS, CITY COUNCIL PRESIDENT CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: JIM WHITE, MAYOR '" DATE: JANUARY 11, 1994 SUBJECT: APPOINTMENTS TO KENT TRANSIT ADVISORY COMMITTEE I have recently appointed Jay Bakst, Janette Nuss and Russ Stringham to serve as members of the Kent Transit Advisory Board. Mr. Bakst will replace Sherilyn Jordan, who resigned. He is owner/principal of Technologies Service Group located in Renton, is a member of the Kent Chamber of Commerce where he serves as Chair of the Chamber Transportation and Land Use Committee, and will serve as the Chamber's representative on the Transit Advisory Committee. Mr. Bakst' appointment will be in effect until 4/30/95. Ms. Nuss will replace Randy Judkins, who resigned. Ms. Nuss is a member of the Kent Planning Commission, has been active in community affairs and has a long-standing interest in Kent's future. Her appointment will be effective until 4/30/95. Mr. Stringham will replace Gordon Parke, who resigned. Mr. Stringham owns and operates the Hungry Bear Restaurant in Kent and is vitally interested in Kent's future development. His term will be effective until 4/30/94. I submit this for your confirmation. JW.jb cc: Robert Whalen,Co-Chair Kent Transit Advisory Board Kent City Council Meeting Date January 18, 1994 Category Other Business 1. SUBJECT: APPOINTMENTS AND REAPPOINTMENTS TO THE KENT PLANNING COMMISSION 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Mayor White has recently appointed Russ Stringham to serve as a member of the Kent Planning Commission. Mr. Stringham is a local business owner and has a long- standing interest in Kent's future growth and development. He will replace Al Haylor, who resigned, and his new appoint- ment will continue to 12/31/98. I have reappointed Edward Heineman, Jr. and Robert (Bob) MacIsaac to continue serving as members of the Kent Planning Commission. Mr. Heineman's and Mr. MacIsaac's new terms will be effective until 12/31/99. 3. EXHIBITS: Memorandum from Mayor White 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Mayor White (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended RE W EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember !_' seconds to confirm the Mayor's appointment of Russ Stringham, and reappointment of Edward Heineman, Jr. and Robert MacIsaac, to the Planning Commission. DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 4C �1 I have reappointed Edward Heineman, Jr. and Robert (Bob) MacIsaac to continue serving as members of the Kent Planning Commission. Mr. Heineman's and Mr. MacIsaac's new terms will be effective until 12/31/99. 3. EXHIBITS: Memorandum from Mayor White 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Mayor White (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended RE W EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember !_' seconds to confirm the Mayor's appointment of Russ Stringham, and reappointment of Edward Heineman, Jr. and Robert MacIsaac, to the Planning Commission. DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 4C MEMORANDUM TO: JUDY WOODS, CITY COUNCIL PRESIDENT CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: JIM WHITE, MAYO I IND DATE: JANUARY 10, 1994 SUBJECT: NEW APPOINTMENT AND REAPPOINTMENTS TO KENT PLANNING COMMISSION I have recently appointed Russ Stringham to serve as a member of the Kent Planning Commission. Mr. Stringham owns and operates his own business and has a long-standing interest in Kent's future growth and development. He will replace Al Haylor, who resigned, and his new appointment will continue to 12/31/98. I have reappointed Edward Heineman, Jr. and Robert (Bob) MacIsaac to continue serving as members of the Kent Planning Commission. Mr. Heineman's and Mr. Maclsaac's new terms will be effective until 12/31/99. In order to be in compliance with State Law and Kent City Code, future appointments to the Kent Planning Commission will be for six year terms or for the remainder of the unexpired term, whichever is the shorter period of time. State Law also requires, in Kent's situation, that no more than two terms expire at the same time. The terms of future appointments and reappointments will be adjusted accordingly. I submit this for your confirmation. JW:jb Kent City Council Meeting Date January 18, 1994 Category Other Business 1. SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF CANDIDATES FOR THE VACANT CITY COUNCIL POSITION 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: The Council will consider applications for appointment to the City Council position vacated by the election of Jim White as Mayor. The person appointed shall serve the remaining term of this seat. Candidates will be considered following a 3-5 minute statement to the Council by each applicant. 3. EXHIBITS: Letters of Interest 4. RECOMMENDED BY: (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended 11 EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember to nominate Council position. DISCUSSION: ACTION: ves, Councilmember seconds to fill the vacant City Council Agenda Item No. 4D December 16, 1993 Dear Judy Woods; I am officially announcing my intent to seek the nomination of Jim White's open council seat on the Kent City Council. I feel that my past and current involvement, knowledge, and recent campaign support more than qualifies myself as a strong canidate to fill this appointment. Please send me any information reguarding the current pro- ceedures and needed information for this process. Thank. You, -r- Connie'Epperly cc: Tony McCarthy Jim Bennett Jim White Paul Mann Jon Johnson Christi Houser Roger Lubovich CONNIE EPPERLY KENT CITY COUNCIL APPLICANT 35 year Kent Resident CIVIC INVOLVMENT C.L.A.M.P. (Co -Founder) Downtowntown Design Committee Kent Historical Society Kent Elem. P.T.A. Pres. Youth/Teen Curfew Ordinance (Co -Author) Youth/Teen Center Board Member EMPLOYMENT RECORD 1977 - 1979 Resturant/lounge Manager Peter Guys Resturant (now Jaspers) 1979-1982 Lucky's Grocery Store Assistant Manager Benson Center 1982-1987 Self Employed Artist 1987-1990 Convienance Store lklanager 1992 -Present Newspaper Distributor SPECIAL INTRESTS Citizen Advocate Youth Issues December 14, 1993 25001 116th Ave. S.E. Kent, ,,,A. 98031 Judy ',voods Kent City Cour:cil President 220 - 4th Ave. S. Kent, ;A. yn032-7695 Dear President "r.00ds; I am actlyin�Or `h '' e CiL'iLGOint:;,enL 0 �d '" - ;2 :7L :ten he ass'..meS ''he ,ounci 1 seat 2._n vacar. �_... _ the :-�ayorial^:'.:ties. n nth no cOmm1 t' e�� ' 0 a'y la' ne• T•�sentat � _._ a_ in e---"'' rol1LS 0r Oman' zati OCs. I ',•J111 aCL ^r _LV _.. an 2° rL O-erreSen a th2 LO f"uida �jjiS v. L'✓ into the ?1St Ce.^.L�:ry . .. - �:I 'T G"_ -✓oars as a reside.^.t ar_C: ^i:^O .:,ti '".-"' ��ri -ias rim 2 t 2 ccn- ;cL1 On and civi as pie aS iToarS 2Xr _ nC ___ -. epr i Haar_ C i_P_ Provi ie me th dec-i s ons t-hah' L need .-- oe 7a -i .o -- rl-.o +n�_'i 1 e a t"Onc. t2am r1a-Tar nC YiO'1L -_:fie O ' L:1_7e my La_2nLS ^i: n and o;Oless-onal Oac�:;rouno to V strong forward movement -to 'build a cetter community. 1 have managed ma,, construction rro,iectS :or -r.any �overnr,.ent aQ'encies with good success and IairnesS. 1 would Pe :^.aLcy to Provide a detailed resume end to neet with individual council memOers 0r the council as a .OJc le SO that tne.' Can beccme tamiliar with rmy oualiiic-.tions end abilities. --T nd reouest our direction I stand ready to serve my c- �. -•- y as to vnaL St2CS 1 Sh0L11(] take :, Or0er LJ SecUreaCLOint— merit. I am a canes] da`e for this LOSiLlOn that comes '-jit':Out Political eargage or rersonal agendas. I simply dart to make this community a better place to live, not ust for ourselves and the present, out for our children and future Penerations. oincerel,y, /J 14 Sob i[acisaac c. c. an im enneLt _ r 'ark C r4 i ouser on Johnson au Mann Leona Jrr v' i e DEE MOSCHEL 425 Scenic Way • Kent, WA 98031 • (206) 852-7081 January 10, 1994 Honorable Dr. Judy Woods President Kent City Council 220 South Fourth Avenue Kent, WA 98032 Dear Dr. Woods: The purpose of this letter is to inform you that I am submitting my name as a candidate for the Council to consider as they go through the process of selecting a person to fill the City Council seat vacated by now Mayor Jim White. My family moved to Kent in 1962. My three children grew up here and attended Kent schools. In addition to my residence, I own and manage commercial property in downtown Kent. I have been actively involved as a citizen with the Kent city government for the past 11 years, working on various task forces and serving on the Human Services Commission. In addition, I have worked with various community groups. My association with the Kent Chamber of Commerce and the Kent Downtown Partnership have given me an in-depth understanding of how those organizations and others like them can successfully complement the City and assist all components in promoting economic development for our community. I have always taken a leadership role with each group. I do not take my commitments lightly and actively participate and interact with people. My frequent attendance at Council meetings, participation on many task forces, and intense interest in how our city works has given me the understanding and background I need to serve the citizens of the city as a Council member. I have had a significant voice in some major decisions made at the Planning and Human Services Commission level, and as a result have been actively involved in much of what the current "vision" of Kent is today. I listen, work well with other people, strive to achieve a spirit of cooperation, and am effective in resolving difficult issues. In this packet, I have included a brief overview of what I believe are some of the challenges that Kent as a city will face in the near future and how we can most effectively approach and resolve these issues. I have not attempted to touch on every area of interest or concern. We live in an ever-changing economy and world. I believe that flexibility, adaptability, and a willingness to take a new look is often the key to being successful. I am interested in serving the citizens of Kent and bring with me no personal agenda nor do I aspire to any other political office. I will work hard for what is best for the citizens of the City of Kent as a whole. My past dedication and willingness to work with the City Council, administration and staff for the betterment of Kent and our citizens demonstrates my sincerity and ability to serve well. I respectfully request that the Kent City Council appoint me to carry out the remaining two year term of Council Position #5. Thank you very much Sincerely, ��ele_ Dee Mosch Enclosures OVERVIEW The City of Kent has experienced some very rapid population growth during the past few years. The urbanization of Kent proper and increased population in unincorporated King County on our borders has produced some significant changes in the type of community in which we live. Our challenge is to anticipate the impacts and meet the needs of our citizens in a fiscally responsible manner. Following are some of the areas that we as a City Council need to address. DOWNTOWN REVITALIZATION Kent's Downtown is unique among all of the cities in our immediate area. The Regional Justice Center and the growth and development associated with it will improve the business climate in the downtown area. Kent will become the Urban Center of South King County. If we are to leverage this opportunity, it is important for us to continue to look at programs that will revitalize the Kent downtown core by supporting established as well as new business opportunities during this time of transition. We as a city need to work with local organizations, businesses, the Economic Development Council, and the County. We need to ensure that we continue to hold King County accountable for activities and decisions that will most certainly have a long-range effect upon Kent. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT/REGIONAL PLANNING The City's participation in economic development is an investment in Kent's future. We, as representatives of our citizens, need to ensure that we provide an environment that is healthy and one that promotes responsible growth. This means developing partnerships with those in our city that also have a stake in the vision of what we will become in the future. An important part of our partnershipping activities will need to include active participation in regional planning activities. To favorably impact our economic goals, we need to interact and take a leadership role to form relationships with surrounding cities, King County government, regional business, school districts, the Port of Seattle, the Kent Chamber of Commerce, and other local community organizations. As we establish successful relationships, the City will benefit, not only financially, but in many other ways. As we look at our city organization plan, we need to work hard to be certain that we are creating citizen and community services as well as systems that will result in an environment where our economy can grow and prosper. GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT As growth and development occur, our population will continue to diversify and create new needs for human services. Our supportive relationships with agencies that provide vital services will be most important. We can expect larger populations of the very old as well as the very young, combined with those where English is a second language. These groups will require new and collaborative approaches. If we are not sensitive to these challenges, the City will be faced with considerable sociological pressures. We are already experiencing an increased demand upon our police and fire departments. We must support community- based programs of education and prevention to help our citizens help themselves and work together to create a proper balance between budget efficiencies and good public protection. CLOSURE We must look for effective and financially sound ways of conducting the City's business and continue to support responsible budgeting and organizational efficiencies. All of these efforts must be made while creating an organizational environment within the City that fosters good staff morale and teamwork. Understanding the individual and mutual roles of the City Council, Mayor White and City staff will be a critical element in creating the type of working relationship that will accomplish the many important objectives we face togther. Developing open communication, trust, and cooperation between the Council and Administration is vital to the success of our future goals. I am excited about the future of this fine community and look forward to working with you in a spirit of cooperation. Dee Moschel DEE MOSCHEL Professional Profile 425 Scenic Way • Kent, WA 98031 • (206) 852-7081 COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS OF KING COUNTY 1983 - 1994 President, Board of Directors (1989-1994) Treasurer (1983-1988) The Community Health Centers of King County (CHCKC) grew out of grass roots work done by dedicated individuals who saw a need for affordable, quality health care for all people, regardless of their financial resources. CHCKC currently operates six medical clinics throughout King County which provided over 40,000 comprehensive medical care visits during 1993. My leadership began with the formation of the Kent Community Health Center. I supported and assisted in the merger of the three South County Health Centers and have provided leadership for the expansion of the organization which now includes six sites in King County from Bothell to Federal Way with a budget of over $3 million. This provides me the opportunity to interact with a wide spectrum of local governmental officials and work with them in a cooperative manner. KENT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 1987 - 1994 Board of Directors (1988-1994) Treasurer, Chair, Finance Committee (1993-1994) Executive Committee (1993-1994) Local Government Committee (1988-1994) Elected to three year Board term (April 1990) Strategic Planning Council (1988-1989) Chair of Local Government Committee (1987-1988) Positive relationship with leaders of business in the community. Strong leadership role in an organization representing over 800 businesses in the community. Leader of a fiscal management team for the Chamber, managing a one-half million dollar annual budget. Experience working with Chamber/City cooperative agreements. Work with a spirit of teamwork and cooperating, building relationships with a variety of individuals as Chamber leadership changes from year to year. KENT DOWNTOWN PARTNERSHIP Board of Directors (1992-1994) Treasurer (1992 and 1994) 1992- 1994 Lead the push for formation of this highly successful organization. The Kent Downtown Association was no longer effective; I brought a group of community leaders together with the cooperation of the City of Kent, Kent Chamber of Commerce, and others from the private sector to seek funding, hire a Downtown Director and establish and carry out goals which will keep downtown Kent healthy and vital. HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION - CITY OF KENT Chair (1992) Vice Chair (1987-1991) 1987 - 1992 Appointed to the commission when it was formed in January 1987. Member of the task force evaluating needs of human services in Kent; recommended that a commission be formed. Pushed for the 1% of General Fund support for human services in Kent. DEE MOSCHEL KENT DOWNTOWN ASSOCIATION Page 2 1985 - 1991 President, Board of Directors (1988-1991) Vice President (1987-1988) Board of Directors (1985-1991) During my tenure as President, the City of Kent was looking at the Downtown Comprehensive Plan. I attended all Planning Commission meetings during the process of zoning and determination of the final result. This extended over a period of one year and gave me a good prospective of the work of the Planning Commission. COMMITTEES / TASK FORCE INVOLVEMENT: • Council for At -Risk Children and Youth - Director and member of the founding group that put together the council. This grew out of a task force created by the Health Services Department of the Kent School District to examine the needs of children and youth in the community (1990-1991). • City of Kent Enterprize Zone Committee - Appointed by Mayor to sit on a community group looking at downtown revitalization (1989). • Kent Downtown Revitalization Task Force (January 1988-1989). • Kent Cultural Arts Committee - Appointed by Mayor to community group studying the feasibility of building a cultural arts facility in Kent. Currently an advisory committee member. • Assisted Housing Committee - Member of group studying the need for assisted housing within the City of Kent (1989). • Kent Senior Housing Campaign Committee Member of the Committee which successfully worked to pass the Senior Housing Bond Issue (1989). Sat on the task force deciding the important issues associated with building at least 102 units of senior housing in Kent. • South King County Transportation Task Force - A United Way study of the public transportation uses and needs of the elderly, low income and disabled in South King County (1987-1988). • Citizen Voice Committee - King County Councilman Gary Grant - Chair for Kent Downtown and Valley Floor (1987-1988). • Soroptimist International of Kent - Board of Directors (1986-1994), Treasurer (1992- 1994), President (1990-1991), President Elect (1989-1990), Treasurer (1987-1989). Leadership role in fundraising efforts and all club activities. Financial support for various worthy causes and agencies in the Kent community. • Kent Orthopedic Guild - Member (1963 -Present) AWARDS / RECOGNITION: • David E. "Ned" Skinner Community Service Award - Nominated for this award which is given annually to an individual associated with United Way who most exemplifies selfless giving and community service (1991). • President's Award - by the Kent Chamber of Commerce. This award is given by the President of the Kent Chamber of Commerce to recognize outstanding community service (1990). • "One of Ten Outstanding Citizens in the City of Kent" - by the Valley Daily News (1990). • Woman of Distinction - by Soroptimist International of Kent (1989). • Kent Citizen of the Month - by Kiwanis Club of Meridian. Nominated for this honor by the Kent City Council (February 1984). pUGET SOUND POWER AND LIGHT CO. 400 West Gowe Suite 110 Kent, Wa. 98032 January 6, 1994 City Council Citv of Kent 220 4th Avenue South Kent, Wa. 98032 Dear City Council Person: It is my pleasure to write you concerning Dee vloschels' consideration to a seat on the Kent City Council. Dee has demonstrated her continuing commitment to the Kent citizens and to the quality of our environment through leadership and an active involvement in areas of citizen health and welfare, business growth and development. downtown revitalization, cultural arts, senior and assisted housing, youth at risk and many other community based efforts. Dee has been responsible for the financial health of many organizations she has been involved with. Her financial background has made her both aware and able to deal with complex budget and fiscal issues. I believe that more than any other candidate you may speak to Dee has demonstrated by her actions her dedication to our community. Her efforts have significantly impacted the quality of our city both now and in the future. Dee is a team player that also understands the need for strategic partnerships in our region as we together plan for our future. City Council January 6, 1994 Page -2 I believe her background, commitment, strong people skills, and ability to understand our community needs makes her a logical choice to be your legislative partner on the council. Please accept this letter as my recommendation to you for her consideration to this important post. Thank you!!! Sincerely, Don McDaniel Business Office Manager January 10, 1993 Dee Moschel 448 Alpine Way Kent, WA 98031 Dear Dee: I am delighted to have an opportunity to write a letter of reference for you. In the five years we have worked together through the Kent Chamber of Commerce, you have demonstrated your care and concern for this community over and over again. First, as a member of the Chamber's Board of Directors(1988-1994) you have brought energy, vision and teamwork to this group of strong leaders. You consistently exhibit the highest ethical standards in your business practices, which partnered with excellent management skills led the Board to elect you as Treasurer and Executive Committee member in 1992-93 and again in 1993-94. Second, as Treasurer and Finance Committee Chair, you've run a fiscally sound and prudent organization. You directed a complete reorganization of the Chamber's accounting functions, which brought new technology and -sound financial practices together in a seamless whole. You recruited other financial experts and leaders in Kent's business community to serve on the Finance Committee. You then trained them in the somewhat unique ways of non -profits, accountable to both the general membership and to our Board. Under your direction, the Kent Chamber budget has grown from approximately $273,000 to almost $500,000 in 1993-94. You were instrumental in establishing a clear process for financial review of programming. Third, the Chamber is an excellent test of a leader's ability to (206) 854- 8567 manage human resources. As a volunteer Chamber leader, you've directed the operations of the leading business organization in South King County. The Kent Chamber, with over 800 member .firms, exists to promote business and community prosperity in Kent. You have the respect of your peers, the owners and managers of Kent's business sector. I've also had a chance to work with you on the Kent Downtown Association, and later the Kent Downtown Partnership. As the key organizer and supporter of both downtown groups, you led others with persistence, patience, and a real desire to create a better community. Your work on behalf of the Chamber was recognized with the President's Award in 1990. This honor goes to the volunteer who has shown outstanding community service. Lastly, I have attended many City Government and City Council meetings with you. You have an excellent understanding of City operations developed through years of service. It's an honor to know you, Dee. Best regards, Barbara A. Simpson Executive Director Administration 1035 So. 3rd Suite A Renton, WA 98055 (2_06) 277-1311 Auburn Communis Health Center 105 "A' Street S.W. Auburn. WA 98(k)I ('_06)%35-0166 Bothell Community Health Center 10413 Beardslee Blvd.. *5 Bothell. WA 98011 ('06)486-0653 Eastside Community Health Center 16315 N.E. 87th. TB6 Redmond. WA 48051_ (1_06) 882-1697 Federal Way Community Health Center 30630 Pacific Hwv. So. --101 Federal Way, WA 98003 (306) 575-0494 Kent Community Health Center 4t)3 East Meeker Street Kent. WA 98131 ('06)852-3866 Renton Community Health Center 149 Park Ave. N. Suite 6 Renton. WA 98055 (306)'_'_6-5536 TDD Access South King County - (100) 852-2867 ounty:('06)852-2867 East King County: ('_06)667-8926 January 6, 1994 Honorable Dr. Judy Woods President Kent City Council 220 South Fourth Kent, Washington 98032 Dear Dr. Woods: I'm writing this letter in support of the appointment of Dee Moschel to the Kent City Council. I have worked closely with Dee Moschel over the last seven (7) years in my capacity first as a consultant to and then as Executive Director of Community Health Centers of King County. Dee served as Executive Director and then President of the Kent Community Health Center (formerly Green River Community Clinic). She was instrumental in the early development (1983) of the Kent CHC as a viable, highly respected community health center. She possessed the vision, planning, analytical ability, and political finesse necessary to lead the merger of Kent CHC with two other south -end community health corporations. Community Health Centers of King County (CHCKC) was established in 1987. I witnessed her ability to put aside personal turf interest to serve as a consensus builder to achieve a more viable, cost-effective health care organization that could serve each of the three south -end communities better, well into the future. Dee Moschel served as the first President of CHCKC from 1989-1992. She was re-elected as president of CHCKC in 1993. Besides her commitment to the provision of primary health care for medically underserved individuals,.Dee is well known for her volunteer and civic efforts in the community. The United Way of King County honored Dee Moschel as one of its top three finalists for the David E. "Ned" Skinner Community Service Award of 1991, which exemplifies self -less giving and community service. Dee has demonstrated her interest in and dedication to the development and operation of the progressive City of Kent through her performance on various committees including the Human Services Commission. 'We care for you. All of you. " Dee consistently demonstrates her ability to assimilate information; thoroughly digest it from all angles including financial; strategize according to internal/ external factors and a vision for the future; set up plans, goals and tasks; and follow through on a course of action. She manages to do all of this taking into consideration all points of view and the political environment while moving toward consensus building. She is a tireless worker who can juggle many balls in the air at one time. She has a professional, business, real estate, and non-profit background of experience. The people of Kent and the Kent City Council will benefit immeasurably by having Dee Moschel serve as a City Council member. Sin erely., Jayne B. Leet, MBA Executive Director ERIC A. AASERUD THERESA M. AHERN C. PETER CURRAN MARK W. DAVIs JENNIFER A. EWERS DAVID T. H=7 STEPHEN L. JOHNSON MELVIN L. KLEWENO. JR. JOSEPH A. MCKAMEY Km ADAMS PRATE JANE C. RHODES LARRY R. ScHREum January 6, 1994 Council Members City of Kent Kent City Hall Kent, WA 98032 LAW OFFICES CURRANT KLEWENO & JOHNSON A PROFESSIONAL SERVICE CORPORATION KENT PROFESSIONAL PLAZA 555 WEST SMITH STREET POST OFFICE BOX 140 KENT, WASHINGTON 98035-0140 Re: City Council Vacancy Ladies and Gentlemen: TELEPHONE (206) 852.2345 ESCROW DEPARTMENT (206) 859.1090 FACSIMILE (206) 852.2030 I am directing this letter to you on behalf of Dee Moschel. Dee has expressed interest in being appointed to the vacancy currently existing for a Council Member. I cannot think of anyone who, in my judgment, is more qualified to be appointed as a member of your Council. I have known Dee for almost 30 years in the capacity of neighbor, client, member of groups and boards of various community activities, primarily nonprofit corporations, and most importantly as a treasured friend. Dee is honest, intelligent, forthright, hardworking, compassionate, and has a wonderful sense of humor. She is extremely fair minded. In summation, all of the qualities I know Dee to possess would, in my judgment, make her an excellent member of the Council of the City of Kent. I would urge your most serious consideration of Dee as the person to be appointed to the existing vacancy. Thank you for your consideration of this recommendation and endorsement of Dee's application. very truly yours, CURRAN, KLEWENO & JOHNSON, S. elvin L. Kleweno, Jr. MLK/mah �»st Chmstian Chuach of kens (disciples of Ghaist) January 7, 1994 PERSONAL RECOMMENDATION for Dee Moschei, applicant for position on Kent City Council I am pleased to send this recommendation in support of Dee Moschel's application to be selected for the vacancy on the Kent City Council. Dee has been a most active volunteer in many capacities which equips her to be experienced and skilled in city governance. She was a member of the Mayor's Study Committee on Human Services and the City of Kent which resulted in the unanimous passage of the policies and criteria for human service funding and the ordinances establishing the Human Service Commission and the 1% tax funding level. Her participation on the Commission for six years demonstrated strong leadership and she was one of those volunteers who enabled Kent to assume a position of leadership in all of South King County in the area of human services. As a downtown property owner she is acquainted with the effects of taxes and growth. She has been President of the Downtown Association and been a leader in the current Downtown Partnership program. Her active commitment to the revitalization of the downtown core area is evidence of her interest and support of these efforts. Dee began as a board member and then President of the Kent Community Clinic and was instrumental in the building of an alliance between other community health clinics in South county and finally to the establishment of the Community Health Centers of King County. Currently she serves as the President of this Board. Administrative coordination and sound fiscal management have created an fine example of regional networking and planning. These experiences will provide resources for her as Kent moves into a larger role in regional governance. Her public speaking ability has been enhanced by her term as President of the Kent Soroptomist Club. She expresses herself well and works hard at good communication, both in public presentations and in two-way dialogue. Dee Moschel has already demonstrated her commitment by attendance and involvement in meetings of the Kent City Council over a long number of years. She has worked with various City Council members and under the administration of our last two Mayors. She has demonstrated that she is and will be a team player. Ministers MARVIN ECKFELDT ROBERT HANSMEIER 11717 SE 240th Street PO Box 5009 Kent, Washington 98064-5009 (206) 852-1930 While Dee has many strong opinions and viewpoints herself, she is open to listen to others, respectful of differing perspectives and willing to work for consensus. These qualities, as you know, are crucial and critical for a seven person City Council. Without reservation I add my endorsement to her application and would be happy to answer any questions you might have. Most sincerely, OI' Marvin Eckfeldt, Minister ME:im ........... ......... ..... _ _ 1. January 6, 1994 Ms. Judy Woods President, Kent City Council 220 4th Avenue South Kent, WA 98032 Dear Judy, I understand that Dee Moschel is one of the candidates that is being considered for the vacancy on the Kent City Council. As a resident of the city of Kent, I would like to encourage you to select Dee for this position. I have been associated with Dee Moschel for eleven years through my involvement on the Board of Directors for the Community Health Centers of King County (CHCKC). During that time, Dee has served as President of the Board of Directors for three different terms. CHCKC has grown to six community health centers to meet the health care needs of the medically underserved in King County. Dee's leadership has been instrumental in providing direction for the Board in the ever-changing environment of the health care field. If you would like to discuss this matter further, please give me a call. Sincerely, /,'John C. Campion 9641 South 246th Place Kent, WA 98031 852-2355 (H) 462-3382(W) 30poptimist INTERNATIONAL OF KENT P. O. Box 456 Kent, Washington 98035 January 15, 1994 Judy Woods, PhD. 23633 112th SE , #D104 Kent, WA. 98031 Dear Judy Woods, The membership of Soroptimist International of Kent, would like you to support the application of Dee Moschel for the open position on the Kent City Council. It is our concern, that this position be filled with a person who has been active in Kent government and community sponsored committees for the betterment of all persons. Dee has demonstrated qualities of leadership, concerns for those in need, guidance for those without direction in a low key, but effective manner. She is respected by our membership for her dignity of service and integrity of profession. Her business principles recognize the rights of others and if appointed would use her position at all times so that a higher level of human ideals and achievements may be attained. Dee is a warm, caring and compassionate person who exhibits the ability to make others feel genuine. She is a giver of her time, so that others may have a better life. Therefore, she would contribute to the council a balance of government and people needs for the growth for the city of Kent and the people of the community. SinkL:'� cerely, oz. PCX, Patricia L. Karrasch President, S I of Kent January 13, 1994 Dr. Judy Woods, President Kent City Council 220 4th Avenue South Kent, WA 98032 SUBJECT: Kent City Council Position - Letter of Application Dear Dr Woods and City Council: RE909909 JA H 13 1994 CITY OF KENT CITY CLERK I would very much like to be considered to fill the vacant City Council position. My background and experience as an architect, my analytical and organizational skills and my ability to work with individuals and groups will serve the City well. I also have a great love for my City. I believe that my passion is an important element in the decision making process. I have enclosed my resume for your evaluation. Below, I also have summarized some other relevant experience: Worked Effectively with Individuals and Groups - In Kirkland as a member of the Business Committee of the Chamber of Commerce, I worked with community businesses and the City to pass a Business Improvement District (similar to an L.I.D.). I contributed to both the planning and budgeting. Served as Trustee for the Lake Washington United Methodist Church. Served as a Precinct Committee Officer in Kent. Served on the Board for Detek Corporation and Deernad Construction. As a practicing architect worked with various community groups and government officials. Resolve Conflicts - Mediated conflict between Contractor and Owner for change orders on East Hill Shopping Center. Resolved without causing delays due to research, documentation and prompt responses. I also worked with the City's staff to resolve problems that arose during construction. I have experience working with hostile civic groups opposed to rezones, proposed developments and annexations. • Work on Management Team - With the representatives of Sea -First Bank and my staff at Bayley Construction Company we planned, budgeted and scheduled maintenance and construction projects for 165 buildings statewide. I administered contracts with over 200 subcontractors and vendors. • Civic Involvement - Served as a facilitator for the City of Kent for their Vision 2000 community planning project. I am an active member of the Kent Kiwanis Club. I am a member of the Club's Sponsored Youth Committee (Key Club at Kent Meridian). Past member of the Kent Chamber of Commerce. Served on the Kent Beautification Selection Committee. I am an active member of the Kent Methodist Church. I will be serving as a member in the Downtown Partnership's Planning Committee. Kent has begun efforts to revitalize and streamline the effectiveness and efficiency of its City government. It needs innovative and sensitive leaders tempered with common sense. I am such a person. I will make myself available at the upcoming City Council meeting next Tuesday to speak on my own behalf. Thank you for your consideration. Yours ly, Theodore E Nixon ALA 911 E Temperance Street Kent, WA 98031 (206) 859 2388 1-800-532-4097 enclosures: Resume Theodore E Nixon AIA 911 East Temperance Street Kent, WA 98031 (206) 859 2388 Knowledge Skills and Abilities • ARCHITECTURE - Design through Construction Documents • ENGINEERING - Structural, Mechanical, Civil, HVAC, Solar • CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION - Bid Analysis, Change Orders, Observation, Close-out • PROJECT MANAGER - Estimating, Preparing Bid Documents, Scheduling and Tracking, Quality Control • REPRESENTATION - Public Hearings, Annexation , Variances and Rezone requests. • KNOWLEDGE OF CODES & ORDINANCES - 91 UBC, UFC, WA Energy Code, Accessibility Code I ADA, Zoning, Wetlands, Steep Slope, Health Code, Plats • PERMIT PROCESS - Environmental Check List, Predevelopment Conferences, Applications • COMPUTER LITERATE - Autocad 11, MiniCad+4.0, Word 5.0, Microsoft Project, Excel 4.0 • PRESENTATION - Renderings, models, ink, [Harker, colored pencil, watercolor, photography Education 1993 Highline Community College, Autocad John L Scott Realty, 30 His Real Estate Fundamentals 1985 Seattle University, Construction Management 1977 to 1983 University of Washington, Architecture, Civil Engineering, BA in Architecture 1975 to 1977 Green River Community College, Pre -major 1969 to 1971 U.S. Navy, Nuclear Power School, Certified Nuclear Operator Registration Montoure Real Estate Corporation. 1984 to Present Architect, State of Washington (NCARB Cert.) 1993 Real Estate Salesperson, State of Washington Professional Employment 1986 to present PRINCIPAL, NIXON ARCHITECTS. Currently operating Nixon Architects, an architectural firm specializing in commercial and residential projects for private sector. Projects include: Peterkirk Square Office Complex, Creekside Medical Building, Fay Residence, Mowat Residence, Brown Residence, Lake Stevens Apartments, Juanita Creek Stream Restoration, Kirkland Boardwalk, Restaurant Proposal at Carillon Point. Also Agent for Montoure Real Estate Corporation. 1992 PROJECT MANAGER, SEATTLE HOUSING AUTHORITY. Administered portion of $60 million Federal Grant to S.H.A. for low income housing renovation and abatement projects including agency buildings. Represented S.H.A. at Community Council Meetings; prepared bid packages, cost estimates and schedules. 1989 to 1992 PROJECT ARCHITECT 1 JOB CAPTAIN, LM. CAMPBELL & ASSOC. Worked with clients, developed program requirements including budgets; schematic and preliminary design; design development including cost estimates, working drawings and specifications; coordination of consultants; prepared bid packages; assisting client in bid & negotiations; construction administration and managemenL Supervised team of architects and draftsmen. Projects include: East Kent Shopping Center, Winslow Shopping Center, Kent Law Offices, Horizon View Townhouses, Kent II Office Park, Center of Faith Church, Brittney Lane Townhouses plus numerous tenant improvement projects. 1986 ARCHITECT, PAUL HALL ARCHITECTS. Worked with staff on (Temporary) production drawings and specifications, coordination & quality control of mechanical and electrical consultants, field surveys of as -built conditions. Projects include: Highline Co -Op School Addition for ambulatory and semi - ambulatory students, Rose Hill Jr. High School remodel. Designed Solarium for Anthony's Homeport Restaurant incorporating solar chimney. Theodore E Nixon CONTINUED 1984 to 1986 PROJECT MANAGER I ARCHITECT, R.E.BAYLEY CONST. Managed the maintenance, repair and construction projects for 165 Seafirst Bank Buildings in the state and several buildings for the Prescott Group. Supervised staff, worked with clients, developed program requirements including budgets; schematic and preliminary design; design development including cost estimates, working drawings and specifications; prepared bid packages; construction management. Other projects included: Bekins Moving and Storage Facility, Totem Lake Offices and construction inspection services for Axelrod 1983 to 1984 Corporation. VICE PRESIDENT, DETEK CORPORATION. Managed the design / build Worked with clients, developed program requirements including division. budgets; schematic and preliminary design; design development including cost estimates, working drawings and specifications; prepared bid; construction management. Projects included the Roe house, Powers Residence, 8 Standard Log home designs for Cascade Log Structures and Seattle Metro's Customer 1982 to 1983 Service Lobby. LEAD DESIGNER 1 DRAFTSMAN, CASCADE LOG STRUCTURES. (Temporary) Supervised design and drafting team Designed, engineered and prepared construction documents for a dozen or so structures ranging from vacation 1981 to 1982 cabins to custom residential structures. SPACE PLANNER I DRAFTSMAN, RAINIER BANK. Detailed Casework (Temporary) and wrote specifications for Blaine Branch and Main Lobby of Rainier Tower. in for Banks Corporate Banking Headquarters. Designed Assisted space planning and prepared working drawings for banks computer room addition at 4th & 1981 Spring Building. ARCHITECTURAL DRAFTSMAN, USKH. Worked with staff on (Temporary) production drawings and specifications for Industrial Arts Building (Kenai Community College). Assisted in preparation of presentation drawings for Anchorage Library Competition. Surveyed and prepared facility analysis of Stellar Elementary for Anchorage School District. 1980 PROJECT ENGINEER, PENBERTHY ELECTROMELT. Engineered (Temporary) structural steel platform and refractory steel and prepared construction drawings for prototype 110 ton per day glass factory in Mexico. 1975 to 1980 ARCHITECTURAL DRAFTSMAN. L. M. CAMPBELL & ASSOC. Assisted in the preparation of working drawings and specifications. Projects included: Villa Shopping Center, Auburn 100 Industrial Park, Auburn I Manufacturing Building, M.C.O. Office Building, Holiday Minimart, Lacey Downs Plaza, Nelson Business Park, Maple Lane Apartments, several tenant improvements such as Toys Galore Store at Southcenter Mall. Organizations 1984 American Institute of Architects (AIA) 1992 International Congress of Building Officials (ICBG) 1985 Chamber of Commerce 1985 K.iwanis 1993 Commercial & Investment Brokers Association Witary Service 1969 to 1975 U.S. NAVY: Graduated in top 10% of class from Nuclear Power School. Graduated top of class (1 of 135) from Submarine School. Assigned to a nuclear power fast attack submarine for four years. Within two years was qualified on senior watch station as Engmeroom Supervisor. Awarded Navy Unit and Presidential Unit Citations, Navy Expeditionary and Viet Nam Service Medals. uEnlup JAN 13 1994 CITY OF KENT CITY. CLERK Council President Dr. JUdv Woods 220 Fourth Ave. S. k.:ent, Wa. 93- f) 2 Dear Dr. Wo=rds, Please aCC?QZ_ _~__ _ettar C.nd .`IC _MCIC ed iTlat r :a' as ITI'j app1ica4-ion f �r the: re_ent1%---a`=''i' i- 'h r.r_.Lr =_at. I am =ib iml:t=it❑. =r c _. _=n=._ .-=f=r=n-==. -hese are per-.Qle Wh.= -._.._ -ervca v =ii _, U.'."iil�:'il';. _ __ __"-IT _._ _. _ �_.� .. _ �'�a�id r -r 1 rlr i!_id='J iri t _._ I __ _.. _ -. i._'ImC=.- -jt _=IT' IT' i `t=_= _F-, _juriiil_ -_ _. -.i _ __.� - 07 :G ITIE as a =hare their oiniCn_ Ait. CJU- 'ic �.i5 tile• i___.a i�cUJ-%3l'_;� T=:.l �_�=- _:-; C:TI WS;'"_ L"ri nt'e_'C. one was nct. You wi i l f in ar._ _ .=r- l i s - c _. _=n=._ .-=f=r=n-==. -hese are per-.Qle Wh.= -._.._ sg; eer4 `c =.- ti -i na.;n-2 - - be included �'or _ _. otrier COLM=.._ memo=-_ __=^ntact. to =hare their oiniCn_ Ait. CJU- r 1 bri Peri_ -n- _;cCi-=a`ion tC this i beliC`vC 1 nils eerie. _. p 0 i tis:nLhcit 4•Ji1_ ':= an a.SSat d U r 4 Q this time of t c. n Si ti or, my invet:ement QOe= ba._i:: c` ar seven year= and my int='rasf in re:-'r__=nting the citizens a-' has never diminished. I look: for Warn __ address -.ng _h ru.11 Council on January 18. Thank %vu for C..r _=nsidertion. Sincerely, Leona Orr 24909 114th. Ave. S. E. tient, Wa. 98 ).-71 859-459' f —: ,. l.:• : ,G R/'.� .�1�+;.+�.4 31 ^' � c�,7 .� `i�vl 'n �.°r�.il1'�R�,. . ., COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT Four year member of Kent City Council City Council Planning Committee Chair City Council Operations Committee City Council Budget Committee City Council Public Safety Committee City Council Public WorF.-:s Committee Growth Management Committee Chair Impact Fees Committee Chair Project Lighthouse Committee Youth Center Committee Single Family Housing Committee Chair Housing Advisory Committee Assisted Housing Committee Senior Housing Committee Planned Unit Development Committee Enterprise Zone Committee Downtown Zoning Committee Kent School District Concurrency Task Force Kent Planning Commission 1 1,• Letters 3 that easy to find White should welcome Orr to the council I think Jim White should feel honored and appreciate the fact that someone with Leona Orr's integrity, knowledge, experience and dedicated concern for the City of. Kent should want to fill his posi- tion ori the council. She would only be an asset. She knows that she lost the elec- tion for mayor fair and square but does that mean she should hide to a corner? Is there something wrong with the fact that she wants to stay involved and continue to work hard, long hours for us — the citizens of Kent? If she had been elected mayor, Mr. White would have been on the council and I am sure she would have welcomed him — experienced hard work- ing, honest individuals who dedicate their time to the community are just not N.J. Gibson Kent Leona Orr should �� get council post _r Leona Orr's term on the Kent City Council expires on Dec. 31. Simulta- neously, Jim White will be vacating his council seat to assume his new duties as mayor. The City Council must appoint some- one to fill his unexpired council term, and Orr is interested in doing so. This is Pur good fortune. Leona Orr has demonstrated intelli- gence, leadership, integrity, common sense and energy in her service to Kent community. My opinion is shared by a large con- stituency that came very close to electing her mayor last. November. Leona Orr not only has a great track record, she's already on the track. As a current council member, she is up to speed on all issues and already has established. working relationships with key parties. I hope and trust our City Council will again agree that these qualifications are unequaled, and that we still need Orr on the council: If Mr. White chooses to make a rec- ommendation, his endorsement of Leo- na Orr would demonstrate both states- manship and goodjudgment.•The mayor should know we can't afford to let the good ones get away! Janice L. Redding Kern 0t The Editor, The Valley Daily News 600 South Washington Avenue Kent, WA 98032 9615 South 203d. Street Kent, WA 98031 December 14, 1993 The letters from Mr. Carey (12-12-93) and Mrs. Carey (12-14-93) regarding the proposed appointment of Leona Orr to fill the vacancy created by the election of Jim White as mayor, has raised a question in my mind. Certainly had the vote gone the other way, 49F6 to 51 Fo in favor of Ms. Orr , the Careys would not be asking Councilman White to vacate his council seat. By asking Ms. Orr to "accept defeat gracefully and step aside" would be slap in the face of 497o of the voters who felt that she has the qualifications not only to be a Councilperson, but to be the top elected official in the city. It appears that these good folks think that because of the way Council terms operate, Ms. Orr should not be considered for the Council position, whereas had the results been differeq and Ms. Orr had been elected mayor, Mr. White should remain in his Council position. Come on Bill, where is that sense of fair play I heard you talk about all of those years on the soccer field. Could it be that its not Ms. Orr who "is not interested in promoting harmony and cooperation on the council, but only in furthering her own agenda"? Doug Gesler i 3 cc: Kent City Council The Editor, The Valley Daily News 600 South Washington Avenue Kent, WA 98032 9615 South 203d. Street Kent, WA 98031 December 14, 1993 The letters from Mr. Carey (12-12-93) and Mrs. Carey (12-14-93) regarding the proposed appointment of Leona Orr to fill the vacancy created by the election of Jim White as mayor, has raised a question in my mind. Certainly had the vote gone the other way, 49F6 to 51 Fo in favor of Ms. Orr , the Careys would not be asking Councilman White to vacate his council seat. By asking Ms. Orr to "accept defeat gracefully and step aside" would be slap in the face of 497o of the voters who felt that she has the qualifications not only to be a Councilperson, but to be the top elected official in the city. It appears that these good folks think that because of the way Council terms operate, Ms. Orr should not be considered for the Council position, whereas had the results been differeq and Ms. Orr had been elected mayor, Mr. White should remain in his Council position. Come on Bill, where is that sense of fair play I heard you talk about all of those years on the soccer field. Could it be that its not Ms. Orr who "is not interested in promoting harmony and cooperation on the council, but only in furthering her own agenda"? Doug Gesler 3 cc: Kent City Council ; E r. PERSONAL RETE=:. r � _r Alicr_ Flerminq '5`- East Hill ;.`lil. j'=:=lccment Cent=r Ec: Heineman 852-20:0- Kent Planning Fete Curran i-`-_--D3-:i e - SZ -1-7026 Jan= _- - at r_- -- n Kent City Council C/O City Clerk City of Kent 4TH & Gowe Streets Kent, Wa 98032 pumB JAN 1 3 1994 CITY OF KENT" CITY CLERK January 13, 1994 Susan Ramos 25222 38TH AVE S. Kent, Wa 98032 RE: Letter of Application for Vacant Council position Dear Kent City Council: Please accept this letter as my application for the vacant council position now up for consideration by the full council. I believe that my commitment over the last 3 years to community service as Chairperson for the Kent Human Services Commission la mfe y deep interest d ntinuing the community's quality in coof a desired level of city services and a through the provision can be used as a counci protected natural environment, resume for to better serve the residents of Kent. I have attached a resume the council's review. My primary interest in serving on the council is threefold: 1. I want to work with the council and Mayor White to maintain a level of government that the taxpayer can support without any compromise of our existing level of public safety services. 2. I want to work with the council and Mayor White to develop policies that foster economic growth, balance growth management concerns, support expanded transit services, enhance cultural\social development opportunities and increase the accessibility of public services to our citizens. 3. And, lastly, I want to simply try to contribute whatever my efforts on the council can bring to the well being of this wonderful community. forwardctotspeakingobefore ayou ninnmore detail tatothe nd next council meeting. Very Truly Yours, sanRamos RESUME SUSAN RAMOS 25222 38TH AVE. SO. KENT, WASHINGTON 98032 (206) 946-3760 EDUCATION 1977 - 1979 B.A., Business, Government and Society, (Human Services Proaram), University of Washington. Thesis: Managing Cultural Diversity in Public Services. 1076 - 1978 Certificates: Federal Insurance Entitlement Training Programs, Social Security Administration; Department of Health, Education and Welfare: Boise, Idaho and Seattle, Wa. 1974 - 1976 Completed; Personnel Supervision and Management Program, South Seattle Community College. 1967 - 1970 Diploma: Saint Francis Academy, High School San Antonio, Texas SUMMARY OF_COURSE WORK * INTRODUCTION TO PUBLIC SPEAKING * HISTORY OF SOCIAL WELFARE * HEALTH AND SOCIAL BEHAVIOR * RACIAL FACTORS IN ADMINISTRATION * SOCIAL GERONTOLOGY * CHICANO HISTORY * FUNDAMENTAL OF SUPERVISION PRINCIPLES OF MANAGEMENT FUNCTIONS * DATA PROCESSING * SUPERVISOR AS TRAINER * MICROECONOMIC THEORY * INTRODUCTION TO ACCOUNTING * SUPERVISION AND GROUP BEHAVIOR * MANAGEMENT BY OBJECTIVES * SOCIOLOGY OF CHANGE * SOCIALIZATION * SOCIOLOGY + PSYCHOLOGY * MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS * BUSINESS AND PUBLIC POLICY * ORGANIZATIONAL THEORY * BUREAUCRATIC STRUCTURES IN SOCIETY * MARKETING CONCEPTS * BUDGET PREPARATION 1975 - 1983 Progressive Advancement Proaramr Claims Representative (C=S 9-12), Service Representative (GS 7-9) and Claims Development Clerk (GS 4-7) Social Security Administration, Seattle Reaional Office. Processed Federal Benefit claims, analyzed, investigated, adjudicated, interpreted Federal Entitlement Retirement Insurance applications for the Social Security Administration. Interviewed applicants and applicants Medical and Leaal Advisors on Benefit qualifications and coordinated with State DSHS personnel on case files. 1972 - 1975 Outpatient Clinic SnpPr.visor/Manager University of Washington Dental School Emergency Ortel and Dental Department Seattle, Washington Supervised ani managed office personnel and dental studenF-s in providing dental ^Prvi(-.s F. .tl trtral ly di,yerse patient population. l a n 19-, Mr>dical "rp,nrds Assistant University Hospital University of Texas, Austin Prepared and processed medical records and out-patient schedules for the student and spouse population of the university of Texas. REFERENCES Dee Moschel, President of Community Health Clinics of. King County, 850-7081. Lynn Ball, Manaaer, Office of Human Services, city of Kent Plannina Department, 859-3390. Susan Goebel. Administration, Hoad Start Program, Burien Office, 439-6910. Russ Stringham December 17, 1993 MgHN99 DEC 3 0 1993 CCITf�CLERK Judy Woods President Kent City Council 220 - 4th Avenue South Kent, WA 98032 Re: Application for Appointment to Upcoming Open Council Seat Dear President Woods: Please consider this my official application for appointment to the Kent City Council seat that will be vacated by Mayor -Elect White on January 1, 1994.. I've attached a copy of my resume delineating my private industry background for Council consideration. Should you require additional specifics, please feel free to ask. It would be greatly appreciated if you could keep me informed as to the details of the application process. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Russ Stringham Enclosure 852-5007 524 W. Meeker • Suite 6 • Kent, WA 98032 Russell E. Stringham Jr. Resume of Qualifications 1411 W. Smith #522 (206) 850-9670 (Home) Kent, WA 98032 (206) 852-5007 (Work) CAREER HISTORY THE HUNGRY BEAR/EXPERT CATERING SERVICES, OCTOBER 1989 TO PRESENT Owner/Operator WENDY'S OLD FASHIONED HAMBURGERS, AUGUST 1984 TO AUGUST 1989 Manager, Human Resources; Wendco Northwest Limited. (Formerly company owned market) was responsible for the sourcing, recruitment, interviewing, and reference auditing of field operations personnel as well as various support staff positions. Assisted field operations personnel in store level staffing. Developed, implemented and followed up on various policies and procedures. Counseled operations personnel regarding disciplinary actions and termination decisions. Wrote and conducted workshops on various human resource issues. Processed all worker's compensation claims, customer incidents and unemployment claims. Handled all legal claims, including wage and hour, unlawful employment practice, and OSHA. Conducted store -level human resource and safety audits. (December 1985 to August 1989) Regional Manager, Human Resources; Wendy's International, Inc. Supervised and monitored the personnel function for a region consisting of 53 company owned stores encompassing approximately 250 management and 1400 hourly employees. Responsibilities included managing the regional recruiting effort, monitoring and implementation of performance appraisals, compensation programs, TJTC, benefits programs, EEO Compliance and Attrition Intervention. In addition, supervised area recruiter and clerical support personnel. (August 1984 to December 1985). RESCO ENTERPRISES, SEPTEMBER 1983 TO MARCH 1986 Owner. Profitably operated a mail-order stamps for collectors business. VISTA HOST, INC., NOVEMBER 1982 TO SEPTEMBER 1933 Food Manager. Was responsible for supe,---ision of food operation with approximately 35 employees aria annual sales volume of $750K. Oversaw all banquet functions, kitchen operations and front of the house personnel. Served as hotei manager or, duty dating evening hours and all day Sundays. Property was a 163 room Holiday Inn located in Ft. Pierce, Florida. AUGUSTON & ASSOCIATES, INC., JUNE 1981 TO NOVEMBER 1982 Executive Recruiter. Starting from scratch, conceived and implemented the hospitality desk. Responsibilities included the recruitment and placement of management personnel specializing in the hotel and restaurant field. Did all interviewing, screening and reference auditing to insure that client companies were provided with the best possible candidates for a given position. Worked with a wide variety of assignments from entry-level to upper management. WINCHELL'S DONUT HOUSES, OCTOBER 1977 TO JUNE 1981 District Manager. Responsibilities included day-to-day supervision of 11 stores with a management staff of 22 and an employee team of approximately 110. To insure that unit level management achieved budgeted goals in the areas of sales, labor and food costs while maintaining high standards of cleanliness and product quality. (November 1978 to June 1981) Store Manager. Was responsible for supervision of 8 to 10 employees. Did all hiring, training, disciplining and wage determination. Trained unit -level managers. Responsible for inventory, order control and sales forecasting. (October 1977 to November 1978) EDUCATION AAS, Entrepreneurial Management • University of Maryland, 1976 Certified Administrator, Targeted Selection Certified, Interaction Management Various seminars and workshops through ASPA MILITARY U.S. Army, December 1974 to December 1976 PERSONAL Single, 38 years old, 6'4" tall, 195 lbs. Excellent professional references furnished upon request. � �' ., :`� �!�.�� ,, `-x J �..- , J i I f Kent City Council Meeting Date January 18, 1994 Category Bids 1. SUBJECT: SIGNAL AT REITEN ROAD & JASON AVENUE 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Bid opening was held on January 4th with six bids received. Because the low bid was submitted by FAX and the second low bidder has implied a possible legal challenge, it is the Public Works Department's recommendation, as concurred with by the Public Works Committee, that the prudent approach would be to reject all bids and reschedule the project for re -bid. 3 � r 3. EXHIBITS: Public Works minutes 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X. YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds that the six bids received for the Signal at Reiten Road & Jason Avenue be rejected and that the project be re -bid. DISCUSSION: <v ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 5A Brubaker said that less than a year ago, we entered into a lengthy contract to lock in service until the year 2001 and now Rabanco is asking for a 21% increase in rates within one year. Brubaker recommended that by the next committee meeting we come back with some sort of compromise, solution and/or a recommendation to go to an audit. Caputo stated that they have used every avenue that the contract has given them and as it gets more and more delayed they would expect to be able to retroactive an increase. Committee recommended that staff review the rate increase issue and bring it back to committee. Segregation Request - LID 320 Wickstrom stated that this was a James Street LID and the segregation request was made by Schneider Homes, on the north side of James Street, west of West Valley Highway. Wickstrom requested approval of the segregation. Committee unanimously recommended approval of the segregation request. Sale of Surplus Vehicles Wickstrom referred to the list of vehicles that were submitted for surplus. Jack Spencer stated that we have 18 pieces of equipment and they all have high mileage or are in need of major repair. McCarthy said that we are getting a new Senior Center van in the 194 budget. He asked if the vans in the list are no longer useable. Spencer said that these were the vans that the Senior Center did have and he would like to keep the better of the two as a back-up. Committee unanimously recommended declaring this equipment as surplus and authorize the sale thereof at the next state auction, with the exception of one van to be used as back-up. Signal at Reiten & Jason Wickstrom said we received six bids and one was received thru FAX which turned out to be the low bid. He said there is $1000 difference between the low bid and the second bid; however because of some improprieties in the FAX bid, the second bidder would possibly sue us. He said that legally awarding the bid to the low bidder is defensible however, a great deal of staff time would be involved in a suit for a $1000 differential. Wickstrom said that the Public Works Dept. is recommending that the six bids be rejected, and the project be re -bid. Committee unanimously recommended rejection of all bids. 3 CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS R E P O R T S A. COUNCIL PRESIDENT B. OPERATIONS COMMI C. PUBLIC WORKS COMMI D. PLANNING COMMITTE E. PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITT F. PARKS COMMI G. BUDGET COMMI H. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS OPERATIONS/BUDGET COMMITTEES (Combined Meetings) JANUARY 3, 1994 COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT STAFF PRESENT: MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC Christi Houser, Chair Jon Johnson Judy Woods Mayor White, Tim Clark, Tony McCarthy, Roger Lubovich, May Miller, Chief angelo, Chief Crawford, Jim Harris, Don Wickstrom, Jan Banister, Jim Miller, Jed Aldridge, Patrice Thorell Jean Parietti, Doug Schwab, Dee Moschel, Paul Morford, Leona Orr, approximately 45 people were present The meeting was called to order at 3:40 p.m. by Chairperson Houser. APPROVAL OF VOUCHERS All claims for the period ending 12/15/93 in the amount of $5,506,581.26, and claims for the period ending 12/30/93 in the amount of $2,391,652.73, were approved. NOVEMBER FINANCIAL REPORT Acting Finance Director Miller reviewed the summary financial report for the period ending November 30, 1993. ANIMAL CONTROL INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT City Attorney Lubovich requested that this item be re -scheduled for the next Operations Committee meeting because an updated agreement is forthcoming from King County, and that more changes are needed before final acceptance. He explained that the City has a proposed agreement with King County for animal control licensing and enforcement, but that an ordinance needs to be passed in conjunction with this agreement. He noted that the City does not have an ordinance dealing with enforcement of animal licensing, and that the City is currently operating without an executed agreement, but that it does have an open agreement with King County from year-to-year. DISCUSSION ON THE PROPOSED REORGANIZATION CHART ADDED ITEM Mayor White offered one change to the chart under Director of Operations. He proposed that the Fleet Facilities Division Manager be eliminated from that list and put back with the Support Division where it is currently. He also proposed that the Fleet be moved to the Public Works/ Operations Division where it is currently. JOHNSON MOVED that a recommendation be sent to Council to keep the Police and Fire Departments organized as they currently are. Woods seconded and the motion carried 3-0. JOHNSON MOVED to approve a Director of Operations and division heads as requested by the Mayor, and that the City Attorney be directed to prepare the necessary ordinance. Woods seconded and the motion carried 3-0. Upon Johnson's question, Lubovich clarified that no action is needed for the Parks Director position at this time. Johnson suggested that the proposal for Director of Community and Economic Development be deferred to the next Operations Committee meeting for discussion with a possible recommendation for the following Council meeting. Lubovich clarified that the Planning and Public Works Departments will continue to report directly to Administration until such time as any other action is taken. WOODS MOVED to eliminate the positions of Chief Administrative Officer and Administration Services Manager. Johnson seconded and the motion carried 3-0. The meeting was adjourned at 4:20 p.m. E CITY COUNCIL PLANNING COMMITTEE MINUTES November 16, 1993 4:00 PM Committee Members Present Leona Orr, Chair Jon Johnson Planning Staff Lin Ball Jim Harris Kevin O'Neill Margaret Porter City Attorney's Office Laurie Evezich Other City Staff Other Guests GROWTH MANAGEMENT UPDATE - (K O'Neill) Senior Planner Kevin O'Neill stated that the Planning Department was hoping to have the Growth Management Service Agreement from King County in time for this meeting. Unfortunately, this Agreement did not get here in time for this meeting. This will need to be brought to the City Council on December 2, 1993 because King County is requesting approval on this Service Agreement and to be returned to the County by December 10, 1993. Chair Orr suggested a special meeting could be held on December 2, 1993 to act on this item if necessary. Mr. O'Neill mentioned three meetings were held on the Comprehensive Plan and scoping for the EIS which were held October 20, October 21, and October 27, 1993 with about 60 people who responded. The same displays will be set up at the Town Hall meeting on November 18 to get more responses. Kevin reminded the Committee members of the workshop scheduled for November 30, 1993 with Henderson, Young & Company between 5:00 - 9:00 p.m. HUMAN SERVICES ROUNDTABLE UPDATE (L. Ball) Lin Ball updated the Committee on the Healthy Families Project, which is a home visitation program for prevention of child abuse and neglect. Auburn was selected as the south county site and is scheduled to open in late January. Seattle's planned opening date is in the spring. Both Auburn and Seattle are assisting in funding the sites. The model for the two pilot sites will consist of screening all parents and CITY COUNCIL PLANNING COMMITTEE MINUTES NOVEMBER 16, 1993 PAGE 2 newborn babies whose mothers both live in selected zip code areas and deliver their babies at selected hospitals. All new births within the pilot project areas will be screened, not just those thought to be at risk. The premise of universal visits is that all new parents need support. The value base of the program is family support and to build on the strengths of the family. Seattle -King County Department of Public Health will administer the project, and Children's Home Society, will be the local lead partner for the Auburn pilot site. The overall goal of the project is: 1. Foster healthy families and the growth and development of young children; and 2. Prevent child abuse and neglect. Lin also reported the grant application to Meyers Memorial Trust for funding of the two sites was turned down but Auburn does have the County Children and Families Commission money. This will not affect the start-up timing, but will affect the implementation of the entire model, level of service, and the evaluation piece. Other funding options are being explored. Lin also reported on the Domestic violence Children's Project which implements a portion of the 1990 Regional Comprehensive Domestic Violence Plan. The Roundtable is facilitating a process to develop a regional model for integration and delivery of services for children of domestic violence. The needs of children affected by domestic violence was recognized as a high priority in the regional plan. There is a growing realization that children in violent homes are severely harmed, either physically or emotionally. It is estimated that 30-40 percent of children in violent homes have been sexually or physically abused. Witnessing violence also has significant affects on children. The impacts on children are enormous; and the issues affecting these children are extensive: - Emotional, physical abuse, sexual abuse, school problems, abusive to others; health problems; substance abuse; trouble with law; gangs; suicide. - Children in volent homes may come to believe that violence is an appropriate way to resolve conflict and to maintain power and control over other people. The goal of this project is to develop a comprehensive, regional array of services to meet the needs of children affected by domestic violence. A draft model for service array has been developed that includes a broad range of services. Money is allocated in the 1994 work program to further develop this program, prepare a detailed work plan, and begin to implement some of the priorities. CITY COUNCIL PLANNING COMMITTEE MINUTES NOVEMBER 16, 1993 PAGE 3 Lin also passed out the Human Services Roundtable Proposed Goals for 1994 Work Program for the Committee to review. UPDATE ON VISIONING CONCEPT - (L Orr) Chair Orr suggested to postpone the discussion of this item until the next regular meeting since Jim Bennett had requested this item be added. ADDED ITEMS: None ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 4:30 p.m. PC01116.MIN PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES JANUARY 3, 1994 COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT: STAFF PRESENT: MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC: Paul Mann, Chair Jon Johnson Tony McCarthy, Ed Allen, Chief Crawford, Chief Angelo, Chuck Miller The meeting was called to order at 5:30 p.m. by Chairman Mann. OVERVIEW OF SECURITY UPDATES AT CORRECTIONS FACILITY Chief Crawford updated the committee on some changes that are taking place at the Corrections Facility. Captain Chuck Miller gave some background information to the committee on escapes from the Kent Corrections Facility, and explained the security measures that have been taken to prevent such escapes. He discussed potential contracts with other agencies, and the Marshal's contract. Chief Crawford noted that different security checks are being required now in terms of the building for county and state, and the physical county people. MUNICIPAL COURT PARKING ORDINANCE Assistant City Attorney Allen explained that the consensus between City Attorney Lubovich, Chief Crawford, and himself is that there is enough in the Kent City Code to designate the parking scheme for the municipal court. He noted that signs have to be put up yet, but that this item can be struck from the agenda because it's already covered in the City Code. DISCUSSION ON NEXT PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MEETING ADDED ITEM McCarthy noted that the next regularly scheduled meeting would be on January 17th which is a Holiday. After some discussion, it was the consensus of the committee to cancel the January 17th meeting unless items come up that must be dealt with and then a special meeting could be held, if necessary. HOMELESS/TRANSIENT CAMPS ADDED ITEM Chief Crawford noted that in the next month or so an issue related to the homeless/transient camps needs to be discussed because there are some major problems developing in these areas. RESIGNATIONS Mann reiterated that he hopes the Chiefs would not submit their resignations, as requested, and that he does not support having someone ovei�two departments as proposed. rr� The meeting was adjourned at 5:54 p.m.