Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
City Council Meeting - Council - Agenda - 02/01/1994
City of NKent City Council Meeting Agenda CITY OF 71B4T Mayor Jim White Council Members Judy Woods, President Jim Bennett Tim Clark Christi Houser Jon Johnson Paul Mann Leona Orr February 1, 1994 Office of the City Clerk SUMMARY AGENDA KENT CITY COUNCIL MEETING February 11 1994 Council Chambers 7:00 p.m. MAYOR: Jim White COUNCILMEMBERS: Judy Woods, President Jim Bennett Tim Clark Christi Houser Jon Johnson Paul Mann Leona Orr CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL 1. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS A. Oath of Office - Councilmember Orr B. 1994 Community Arts Grant Awards C. Employee of the Month D. Proclamation - Daughters of the American Revolution/ American History Month E. Introduction of Mayor's Appointees F. Regional qustice Center Update 2. PUBLIC HEARINGS None 3. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Approval of Minutes B. Approval of Bills C. Jones/Hobbs Annexation AN -94-1 - Set Date D. Workshop on Transit - Set Date E. Workshop on Capital Facilities Plan - Set Date F. Council Absence G. Appointment to Civil Service Commission H. Appointment to Kent Arts Commission I. Reappointment to Kent Economic Development Corporation J. Appointments to Kent Human Services Commission K. Lindental Meadows - Bill of Sale L. Kent Springs Transmission Main, Phase II - Acceptance 4. OTHER BUSINESS A. Chestnut Ridge Comprehensive Plan Map Designation CPA -93-2 - Resolution B. Chestnut Ridge Zoning AZ -93-1 - Ordinance C. Carpinito Business Park Rezone RZ-93-3 D. Cedar Meadows Final Plat FSU -90-4 E. Ramstead/East Hill Annexation F. Drinking Driv r Task Force, 5. B IDS CI None 6. CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS 7. REPORTS 8. ADJOURNMENT NOTE: A copy of the full agenda packet is available for perusal in the City Clerk's Office and the Kent Library. An explanation of the agenda format is given on the back of this page. Any person requiring a disability accommodation should contact the City in advance for more information. For TDD relay service call 1-800-635-9993 or the City of Kent (206) 854-6587. r PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Citizens wishing to address the Council will, at this time, make known the subject of interest, so all may be properly heard. A) Oath of Office - Councilmember Orr B) 1994 Community Arts Grant Awards C) Employee of the Month D) Proclamation - Daughters of the American Revolution/ American History Month E) Introduction of Mayor's Appointees F) Regional Justice Center Update JW+ CONSENT CALENDAR 3. City Council Action: Councilmember move, Coune� _seconds that Consent Calendar msrough L be approved. n,�..o-fi .� e Zv� - Discus 3A. Approval of Minutes. Approval of the minutes of the regular Council meeting of January 18, 1994. 3. Approval of Bills. Approval of payment 1994 after auditing on February 1, 1994. of the bills received through by the Operations Committee at Approval.of checks issued for vouchers: Date Check Numbers Approval of checks issued for payroll: Date Check Numbers January 31, its meeting Amount Amount Council Agenda Item No. 3 A -B Kent, Washington January 18, 1994 Regular meeting of the Kent City Council was called to order by Mayor White at 7:00 p.m. Present: Councilmembers Bennett, Clark, Houser, Johnson, Mann and Woods, Acting Chief Adminis- trative Officer McFall, City Attorney Lubovich, Planning Director Harris, Public Works Director Wickstrom, Fire Chief Angelo, Police Chief Crawford, Acting Finance Director Miller, Acting Parks Director Thorell and Acting Human Resources Manager Viseth. Approximately 85 people were at the meeting. PUBLIC Rent Jaycee Week. Mayor White read a proclama- COMMUNICATION tion declaring the week of January 16-22, 1994 as Kent Jaycee Week in the City of Kent. He encouraged all citizens to recognize and appre- ciate the past and continuing service provided by the Kent Jaycees. The proclamation was presented to Stan Hicks. CONSENT BENNETT MOVED that Consent Calendar Items A CALENDAR through Q, excluding Item D, be approved. Houser seconded and the motion carried. MINUTES (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3A) of Minutes. APPROVAL of the minutes of Approval the special Council meetings of December 30, 1993, and January 2, 1994, and the regular meet- ing of January 41 1994. HEALTH & (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3M) SANITATION Family Homes Short Plat. AUTHORIZATION to accept the bill of sale and warranty agreement submitted by WBH, Inc. for continuous operation and maintenance of 328 feet of water main, 328 feet of street improvement and 150 feet of storm sewers and release of bonds after expiration of the maintenance period, as recommended by the Public Works Committee. The project is in the vicinity of SE 254th Street & 114th Avenue SE. (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3N) Stone Pine East Sewer Extension. AUTHORIZATION to accept the bill of sale and warranty agree- ment submitted by Chaffey Corporation for continuous operation and maintenance of 1,008 feet of sanitary sewer improvements and release of bonds after expiration of the maintenance period, as recommended by the Public Works Committee. The project is in the vicinity of SE 213th Place & 104th Avenue SE. 01 January 18, 1994 HEALTH & (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 30) SANITATION Robinson Sewer Extension. AUTHORIZATION to accept the bill of sale and warranty agreement submitted by Grace Robinson for continuous operation and maintenance of 371 feet of sani- tary sewer improvements and release of bonds after expiration of the maintenance period, as recommended by the Public Works Committee. The project is in the vicinity of 94th Avenue South & South 232nd Street. STREET (PUBLIC HEARINGS - ITEM 2B) VACATION S 231st Street (Landing Way) Street Vacation STV -94-1. This public hearing is to consider an application by Birtcher VDL Land Partnership to vacate Landing Way from 64th Avenue South to South 228th Street as referenced in Resolution No. 1374. Mayor White declared the public hearing open. Jack McCullough, 701 - 5th Avenue, Seattle, spoke on behalf of Birtcher VDL Land Partnership and noted that the proposal is to eliminate the street so land can be planned more consistently with the development pattern of the last few years. He explained that Landing Way no longer serves a role in the plat for which it was originally designed and that Birtcher is in support of the staff's report presented with the proposed conditions. He requested the Council to support the vacation. There were no further comments or questions from the audience. WOODS MOVED to close the public hearing. Johnson seconded and the motion carried. JOHNSON MOVED to approve the Planning Department's recommendation of approval with conditions of an application to vacate Landing Way from 64th Avenue South to South 228th Street as referenced in Resolution No. 1374, and to direct the City Attorney to prepare the neces- sary ordinance upon receipt of compensation. Bennett seconded and the motion carried. 2 January 18, 1994 TRAFFIC (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3E) CONTROL LID 344 Traffic Signal at 108th & 240th. ADOPTION of Ordinance No. 3152 forming the Local Improvement District for the installation of a traffic signal at SE 240th Street & 108th Avenue Southeast, as recommended by City Council. (BIDS - ITEM 5A) Signal at Reiten Road & Jason Avenue. Bid opening was held on January 4th with six bids received. Because the low bid was submitted by FAX and the second low bidder has implied a possible legal challenge, it is the Public Works Department's recommendation, as concurred with by the Public Works Committee, that the prudent approach would be to reject all bids and re- schedule the project for re -bid. Public Works Director Wickstrom explained that because the lowest bid was received by FAX and created some improprieties to the bid process, it would be best to reject all bids and re -bid the project. WOODS MOVED that all bids be re- jected and that the project be re -bid. Bennett seconded and the motion carried. PUBLIC WORKS (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3I) Mill Creek Canyon Erosion - Acceptance. AUTHORIZATION to accept as complete the contract with Golf Landscaping, Inc. for the Mill Creek .Canyon Erosion project, and release of retainage after receipt of State releases, as recommended by the Public Works Committee. (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3J) North 4th Avenue Street Rebuild - Acceptance. AUTHORIZATION to accept as complete the contract with M. A. Segale, Inc. for the North 4th Avenue Street Rebuild project, and release of retainage after receipt of State releases, as recommended by the Public Works Committee. (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3K) 1993 Asphalt overlays - Acceptance. AUTHORIZATION to accept as complete the contract with Lakeside Industries for the 1993 Asphalt Overlays project, and release of retainage after receipt of State releases, as recommended by the Public Works Committee. January 18, 1994 PUBLIC WORKS (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3L) Reiten Road LandslideRe air - Aoce tanOe. AUTHORIZATION to accept as complete the contract with Pile Contractors, Inc. for the Reiten Road Landslide Repair project, and release of retainage after receipt PublicfWorksState Committee. as recommended by the (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3P) Conservation Futures Grant. AUTHORIZATION for the Mayor to sign the King County Conservation Futures Grant Agreement upon the City Attorney's concurrence with the language therein, for the receipt of grant funds to acquire land and/or open space for: A) Kent Lagoons Wetlands/ Wildlife Enhancement project; B) the Upper Mill Creek Canyon Park; and C) the Riverview park; as recommended by the Public Works Committee. STREETS (OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 411.) LID 343 - Street Im rovements on 111th Avenue SE (Sequoia Sidewalks). The Public Works commit- tee has recommended adoption of a resolution setting February 15th as the public hearing date for LID 343 Street Improvements on 111th Avenue SE from Kent-Kangley Road to Sequoia Junior High School. Bennett explained that several months ago the Kent School District approached the City re- garding installation of a sidewalk on 111th as it enters into Sequoia Jr. High School. He explained that the asphalt currently runs over to the ditch which is on both sides so when it rains the children have to jump into the ditch, across the ditch, or walk directly into traffic. He expressed concern that when a better and safer way for children to get to school was requested, the City made a monumental project out of it. He suggested that the safety issue be addressed first with either a gravelled or paved sidewalk, and then the money for the LID be used elsewhere. WOODS MOVED to adopt Resolution No. 1382 setting February 15, 1994 as the public hearing date on LID 343. Mann seconded and the motion carried. 4 January 18, 1994 ANNEXATION (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3F) Everson Annexation. ADOPTION of Ordinance No. 3153 authorizing the Everson Annexation in the vicinity of 93rd Avenue South & South 222nd Street, as recommended by City Council. ANNEXATION (PUBLIC HEARINGS - ITEM 2C) ZONING chestnut Ridge Annexation Proposed Initial Zoning (AZ -93-1). This is the second of two required hearings for the proposed initial zoning of the Chestnut Ridge Annexation area. The first hearing was held on December 7, 1993. The Planning Commission recommends approval of the zoning designation outlined in Alternative #1. Planning Manager Satterstrom gave a brief over- view and updated the Council on the proposed initial zoning. He explained that most of the area is being proposed for R1-7.2 zoning, and a small area for RA zoning which is one unit per acre. He noted that the resolution presented on December 7, 1993 had the entire area on the comprehensive plan for single-family residen- tial, and that the Planning Commission's zoning recommendation is consistent with the Comprehen- sive Plan recommendation. He explained that if Council chooses to adopt Alternative 1 then no change is needed for the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, but if the Council adopts or makes significant changes then the Comprehensive Plan Map Designation Resolution under Consent Calendar Item 3D would also have to be changed. The Mayor declared the public hearing open. Kevin Crane, 3409 NW 65th Street, Seattle, explained that he is an attorney representing a number of homeowners in the Chestnut Ridge area marked 9.6 which is on the upper side where Copper Ridge is located. He noted that home- owners are concerned about sliding down the hill, or being slid into by others in the fu- ture, as testimony was given at the December 7, 1993 hearing. He stated that approximately 50 homeowners he represents are requesting the RA zoning designation be pushed up into the 9.6 area also because of the steep slopes. He noted that the slopes are an erosion hazard made up of 5 January 18, 1994 ANNEXATION alderwood soils which could present great build - ZONING ing difficulties in the future. He explained that this area cannot support any higher density or increased development, and that the community is unanimous in having this area designated as RA. Gary Gedika, 20529 - 7th Avenue South, President of the Chestnut Ridge Homeowners Association, noted that the association is also in favor of the RA zoning. Upon White's ques- tion, Satterstrom clarified that the Planning Commission is recommending the R1.96 zoning, and that public hearings have been held on this issue. Upon Woods question, Satterstrom ex- plained some of the factors leading to the Planning Commission's proposal of Alternative 1. He noted that north of 208th is a little less steep, access is a little better than south of 208th, and that the pre-existing zoning in King County was 9600. Donna Williamson, 20211 - 92nd Avenue South, noted that she is below the Chestnut Ridge area, and that she has been a resident in that location since 1970. She noted concern with the 9.6 zoning coming from the County because of another situation where the land around her was suggested to remain RA which was also suggested by City staff, and then changed to 7.2 even though nothing has been developed at this point. She noted that the Environment Impact Statement (EIS) which found this area to be very sensitive is being disre- garded, and that the City should take a closer look at the area consisting of mobile homes, 50 -year old homes, and $300,000 homes. Ed Heineman, 10824 SE 244th Street, a member of the Planning Commission, explained that a major factor in the Commission's decision was based upon an understanding that no matter what they designated this area, it would be 9.6 because of a legal commitment of some type, as discussed at the public hearing. Lubovich noted that he is not aware of any legal constraints or obliga- tions regarding zoning for the Chestnut Ridge area but that there is an issue of vesting, which is a different situation. Satterstrom reminded the Council that if the zoning were changed to RA, the comprehensive plan and the amendment would have to be changed as well. January 18, 1994 ANNEXATION Andrew Fuller, 20628 - 95th Avenue South, ZONING expressed that a more extensive RA would make more sense because of the steepness of the area, and hopes the City will take into consideration ,some portion of the very steep ravine for a green belt or park area because it would be very well suited for that purpose. Anne McTavish, 20437 - 94th Avenue South, noted that the slopes do carry on through the hillside going north into the 7.2 zoning area, and noted that she is in favor of the RA. John Staneff, 20312 - 96th Avenue South, noted that he is just a little north of the 9.6 zoning area, and that he recom- mends the RA zoning as well. Allen Black, 1233 Federal Avenue East, Seattle, stated that he is one of four owners of the RA property, and that one of his main concerns is that without a planned unit development, it almost becomes a form of taking. He noted that when there is a low density in land with steep slopes on the top and south end, there is no ability to put the 29 units under the proposed zoning. He urged the Council to have some rapport with the Planning Department in re -instituting the planned unit development which was in the City of Kent several years ago. He noted that this would be a contemporary, enlightened way of dealing with the land, and that this land cannot be used to the benefit of both the community and the homeowners without that kind of zoning. Jeanette Nuss, Planning Commission member,' explained that the Commission concluded that Comprehensive Plan #1 was the best alternative because several of the residents spoke to them about drainage problems, the steepness of the slopes, the soil not being suitable to build upon, and several other things that led the Commission to believe that Comprehensive Plan #1 would be the best, and that is why they didn't go with the clustering recommendation. Mark McKay, 9421 South 205th Place, noted that he has lived directly above the hillside for 10 years. He expressed that his greatest concern with 208th being a very steep and narrow road and if it is developed with 9.6 zoning, the emergency vehicles may have a difficult time responding in the wintertime. He also noted that when there is snow or ice on 208th, it is usually closed to 7 January 18, 1994 ANNEXATION traffic. John Kastien, 20609 - 94th Avenue Southnoted that he endorses the RA zoning and ZONING , that the needs of the community should be addressed rather than the needs of the investor. Allen Black clarified for Kastien that he was not suggesting the change of RA zoning at this point but that he was asking Council and the Planning Department to give consideration for a future planned unit development zoning ordinance which the City used to have. He noted that d community zoning is something the population op want, but tools are needed to do the best job possible and that it's important for a differ- entiation to be made. There were no further comments from the audience. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION WOODS MOVED to close the public hearing. Houser seconded. Planning Director Harris noted that if the Council's motion is to approve the Planning Commission's recommendation, the motion should include "and direct the City Attorney to draw up the necessary ordinance". The motion to hearing then carried. WOODS close the public MOVED to amend the Planning Commission's recom- mendation of approval of the Chestnut Ridge Annexation Area initial zoning designation as outlined in Alternative #1 to make the R1-9.6 now RA, and to direct the City Attorney to pre- pare the necessary ordinance. Mann seconded and the motion carried. Lubovich noted that Consent Calendar - Item 3D regarding a resolution for the Chestnut Ridge Comprehensive Plan Map Desig- nation needs to be pulled, amended and brought back to the next Council meeting along with the ordinance for the zoning. (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3D) (REMOVED BY THE CITY ATTORNEY) ... L.ewciVA S chestnut niu ---�-- tion. City Attorney Lubovich noted that the Chestnut Ridge zoning and Comprehensive Plan Map Designation need to go hand-in-hand, and if the zoning is changed then the Comprehensive Plan has to be changed also. WOODS MOVED to table this item until the next Council meeting. Johnson seconded and the motion carried. 8 January 18, 1994 FINAL PLAT (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3Q) Cedar Meadows Final Plat (FSU -990-4) AUTHORIZATION to set February 1, 1994, as the date for a public meeting to consider Cedar Meadows final plat map. The property is located at SE 228th Place and 116th Avenue SE. CABLE TV (PUBLIC HEARINGS - ITEM 2A) Cable TV Basic Service Rate Regulation This hearing has been set to discuss a proposed ordinance that will give the City limited rate regulation authority over a basic service tier of cable television programming, including related equipment, installation and service charges. The City's regulatory authority is authorized by recent amendments to the Federal laws, rules and regulations governing the cable television industry. Assistant City Attorney Brubaker gave.a brief background on the Cable TV rate regulation pro- cess that the City is currently undertaking. He noted that before 1992 the City did not have any rate -making regulatory authority, but in 1992 Congress passed an act which authorized limited rate regulation involving regulation of basic service tier rates and related charges for con- verter boxes, installation, etc. He explained that when this act was passed by Congress it allowed the City to step in and serve at the lowest, most basic level of Cable TV service and regulate rates. He noted that the FCC then implemented rules and regulations which set up a process for cities to obtain rate regulation authority, and that the first step in this pro- cess is certification by the FCC and that the City was certified on December 5, 1993. He explained that upon certification the City has approximately 120 days to adopt regulations consistent with the FCC procedures for rate regulations, and that the ordinance tonight, if adopted, will accomplish the goal. Brubaker explained that once the City's regulations are adopted, the City must tender notice to the franchisee or cable operator, TCI, within 30 days from the date of passage of the ordinance. He noted that TCI will then have 30 days to submit a schedule of rates to the City for 9 January 18, 1994 CABLE TV comparison against a benchmark rate set by the FCC. He stated that if TCI's rates are below the FCC benchmark, they will remain below; if they are the same, they will remain unchanged; and if they are above the benchmark rate, they will be reduced but no more than 10% below the rates charged by the cable provider on September 30, 1992. He explained that there are further processes, such as an appeal process, if the City cannot determine the reasonableness of TCI's rates and then to the FCC if the two parties cannot agree. He noted that in the future the two basic tiers will be limited to increasing rates based on inflation and external costs such as programming or extraordinary franchising costs, and that TCI will be able to increase rates based on system rebuilds which may become a real possibility because they are currently rebuilding a large part of their system in our area. Brubaker noted that the substitute ordinance distributed to the Council tonight was redrafted to clarify a reference made in the ordinance for the people who publish the code just to be clear about our rate making authority for the basic service tier. Mayor White then opened the public hearing. There were no comments from the audience. WOODS MOVED to close the public hear- ing. Houser seconded and the motion carried. HOUSER MOVED to adopt Ordinance No. 3151 relat- ing to Cable TV basic service rate regulation. Woods seconded and the motion carried. COUNCIL (OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4D) VACANCY Consideration of Candidates for the Vacant City Council position. The Council will consider applications for appointment to the City Council position vacated by the election of Jim White as Mayor. The person appointed shall serve the remaining term of this seat. Candidates will be considered following a 3-5 minute statement to the Council by each applicant. 10 January 18, 1994 COUNCIL The following individuals submitted letters of VACANCY interest and gave a 3-5 minute statement on their qualifications and views for consideration for the vacant City Council position: Connie Epperly, Bob MacIsaac, Dee Moschel, Ted Nixon, Leona Orr, Susan Ramos and Russ Stringham. EXECUTIVE At 8:20 p.m., Woods announced an executive SESSION session of approximately fifteen minutes to discuss the qualifications of the applicants for the vacant council position. The meeting reconvened at 8:45 p.m. Mayor White noted that in keeping with past practices of the Council when the issue of an open seat has been considered those decisions have been made on written instruments that have been given to Council and then the presentation of the can- didates at the Council meeting. He noted that unless there is a disagreement from the Council they will keep it to that and allow Council to consider based upon what they have heard and read at this point. There was no disagreement from the Councilmembers. Woods noted that the Council wishes to extend its appreciation to those who applied for the open seat, and that they were very impressed with the strong statements made. She noted that all of the candidates were well-qualified and worthy with many years of combined service to the community. She expressed that the City and citizens are greatly enhanced and proud of the seven appli- cants' continued service to the community. JOHNSON MOVED to nominate Leona Orr to fill the vacant City Council position. Houser seconded. Clark noted that Dee Moschel will receive his support, and Bennett offered Bob MacIsaac as the nominee. Upon a roll call vote, the motion to nominate Leona Orr carried 4-2 with Bennett and Clark opposed. CLARK THEN MOVED to endorse Orr unanimously. Woods seconded and the motion carried. REZONE (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3C) carpinito Business Park Rezone (RZ-93-3). AUTHORIZATION to set February 1, 1994, as the date for a public meeting to consider the Hearing Examiner's recommendation of approval 11 January 18, 1994 REZONE for a rezone application (RZ-93-3) submitted by Mark W. Stiefel. The property is located on the south side of S. 222nd street, approximately 250 feet east of 84th Avenue S. (East Valley Highway). SURPLUS (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3H) VEHICLES Sale of Surplus Vehicles. AUTHORIZATION to declare 18 pieces of equipment as surplus and to sell them at the next State auction, as recom- mended by Public Works Committee. All of these vehicles have either high mileage or are in need of extensive repair. APPOINTMENTS/ REAPPOINTMENTS (OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM ^4B) Mayor White introduced Jay Bakst, Janette Nuss, and Russ Stringham, who he has appointed to serve as members of the Kent Transit Advisory Board. Mr. Bakst is owner/principal of Technologies Service Group located in Renton and is a member of the Kent chamber of Commerce. He will re- place Sherilyn Jordan, who resigned, and his term will be effective until 4/30/95. Ms. Nuss is a member of the Kent Planning Commission and has been active in community affairs. She will replace Randy Judkins, who has resigned and her term will be effective until 4/30/95. Mr. Stringham is a Kent business owner and is vitally interested in Kent's future. He will replace Gordon Parke, who resigned, and his term will be effective until 4/30/94. WOODS MOVED to confirm the Mayor's appointment of Jay Bakst, Janette Nuss, and Russ Stringham to the Kent Transit Advisory Board. Houser seconded and the motion carried. (OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4C) h V111 Maui. aavv Planning Commission. Mayor WHite introduced Russ Stringham, Edward Heineman, Jr., and Robert (Bob) MacIsaac who he has appointed to serve as members of the Kent Planning Commission. 12 January 18, 1994 APPOINTMENTS/ Russ Stringham is a local business owner and has REAPPOINTMENTS a long-standing interest in Kent's future growth and development. He will replace Al Haylor, who resigned, and his new appointment will continue to 12/31/98. The new terms of Edward Heineman, Jr. and Robert (Bob) MacIsaac will be effective until 12/31/99. WOODS MOVED to confirm the Mayor's appointment of Russ Stringham, and reappointments of Edward Heineman, Jr. and Robert MacIsaac to the Kent Planning Commission. Houser seconded and the motion carried. SEGREGATION (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3G) REQUEST segregation Request - LID 320. ADOPTION of Resolution No. 1381 authorizing the segregation of Assessment #17 in LID 320, as recommended by the Public Works Committee. The property is being divided into three separate parcels, thereby each parcel would pay it's equal share of the assessment. FINANCE (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3B) Approval of Bills. APPROVAL of payment of the bills received through November 30, 1993, after auditing by the Operations Committee on December 7, 1993. These figures were inadver- tently omitted from the minutes of December 7, 1993. Approval of checks issued for vouchers: Date 11-1/11-15 11-16/11-29 Check Numbers 135988-136405 136406-136881 Amount $1,284,586.27 11830,372.16 Approval of checks issued for payroll: Date 11-19-93 Check # Advice Check Numbers 188105-188440 # 10668-10996 12-3-93 Check # 188441-188841 Advice # 10997-11379 13 Amount $ 270,528.32 395,925.01 321,372.08 433,178.90 January 18, 1994 FINANCE Payment of the bills received through Decem- ber 31, 1993, after auditing by the Operations Committee at its meeting on January 41 1994, was approved on January 4, 1994. PARKS & (OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4E) RECREATION (ADDED BY BENNETT) Rent Commons. Bennett noted that he would like Administration to look into the possibility of turning the Kent Commons back over to the kids for which it was built, at least on an interim basis. The Mayor noted that he will ask the new Parks Director, when appointed, to look into the possibility of transferring some of the person- nel back to City Hall, and look at perhaps turning the area that used to be a game room back into that use again. PERSONNEL (OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4F) (ADDED BY BENNETT) Personnel. Bennett noted that Tony McCarthy was a long-standing, very dedicated employee who worked very hard for the City and left the City's employ last week. He felt the City owed McCarthy a great deal of gratitude and apprecia- tion for his efforts. Mayor White stated that they are sorry to see him go and thanked Bennett for his kindness. He also noted that the City owes McCarthy a great debt of gratitude. REPORTS Council President. Woods noted that perhaps committee assignments could be done by next week and requested the Councilmembers' input as to which committees they might like to serve on as soon as possible. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 9:05 p.m. S6'�7ii'tCf.. 1 �J Donna Swaw Deputy City Clerk 14 Kent City Council Meeting Date February 1, 1994 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: JONES/HOBBS ANNEXATION (AN -94-1) `- 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Authorization to set February 15, 1994, as the date to meet with the initiators of the Jones/Hobbs Annexation, an approximately 25 acre area of the northwest corner of 100th Avenue S.E. and So. 222nd Street. 3. EXHIBITS: None 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Staff Annexation Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO ✓ YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended_____ _ Not Recommended 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS• 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 3C Kent City Council Meeting Date February 1, 1994 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: WORKSHOP ON TRANSIT - SET DATE 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Authorization to set February 15, 1994, as the date, and 5:30 p.m. as the time, for a workshop relating to transit. 3. EXHIBITS: None 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Council President (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO ✓ YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 3D Kent City Council Meeting Date February 1. 1994 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: WORKSHOP ON CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN - SET DATE 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Authorization to set March 8, 1994, as the date for a workshop on the Capital Facilities Plan. 3. EXHIBITS: None 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Council President (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended-,. Not Recommended I--- 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 3E Kent City Council Meeting Date February 1, 1994 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: COUNCIL ABSENCE 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Approval of a request for an excused absence from the February 15, 1994, City Council meeting from Council President Woods. She will be out of town and unable to attend. 3. EXHIBITS: Memorandum from Council President Woods 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Council President (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO Y YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended_ Not Recommended CV 7. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 3F MEMORANDUM TO: JIM WHITE, MAYOR CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: JUDY WOODS, CITY COUNCIL DATE: FEBRUARY 1, 1994 PRESIDEN)� SUBJECT: CITY COUNCIL EXCUSED ABSENCE I would like to request an excused absence from the February 15, 1994 City Council meeting. I will be out of town and unable to attend. Thank you for your consideration. JW:jb Kent City Council Meeting Date February 1 1994 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: APPOINTMENT TO CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Confirmation of the Mayor's appointment of Carl Hart to serve as a member of the Kent Civil Service Commission. Mr. Hart is employed by Bell Anderson Insurance Agency in Kent and has served as a member of the Board of Directors of Kent Youth and Family Services and has also served on the Board of the Southeast Community Alcohol and Drug Center. He will replace Raul Ramos, who resigned, and his term will continue to 4/30/94. 3. EXHIBITS: Memorandum from Mayor White dated 1/20/94 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Mayor White (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO ✓ YES- FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended_,____ Not Recommended ✓ MR EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 3G MEMORANDUM TO: JUDY WOODS, CITY COUNCIL PRESIDENT CITY COUNCIL MEM ERS FROM: JIM WHITE, MAYOR DATE: JANUARY 20, 1994 SUBJECT: APPOINTMENT TO CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION I have recently appointed Carl Hart to serve as a member of the Kent Civil Service Commission. Mr. Hart is employed by Bell Anderson Insurance Agency in Kent and has served as a member of the Board of Directors of Kent Youth and Family Services and has also served on the Board of the Southeast Community Alcohol and Drug Center. Mr. Hart will replace Raul Ramos, who resigned, and his new appointment will continue to 4/30/94. I submit this for your confirmation. JW.jb Kent City Council Meeting Date February 1, 1994 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: APPOINTMENT TO KENT ARTS COMMISSION 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Confirmation of the Mayor's appointment of Carol McPherson to serve as a member of the Kent Arts Commission. Ms. McPherson will replace Marci Hobbs whose term expired. -C Her term will continue to 10/31/97. 3. EXHIBITS: Memorandum from Mayor White 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Mayor White (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 3H MEMORANDUM TO: JUDY WOODS, CITY COUNCIL PRESIDENT CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: JIM WHITE, MAYOR,, DATE: JANUARY 25, 1994 SUBJECT: APPOINTMENT TO KENT ARTS COMMISSION I have recently appointed Carol McPherson to serve as a member of the Kent Arts Commission. She will replace Marci Hobbs whose appointment expired. Ms. McPherson is a Kent resident and is employed at the Boeing Space Center. She enjoys creating handcrafted items and has taught several handcraft classes. She has four children and encourages them in their arts projects and music through their involvement with The Imperials music program. Ms. McPherson's term will continue to 10/31/97. I submit this for your confirmation. JW.jb cc: Patrice Thorell, Acting Parks Director /Ow Kent City Council Meeting Date February 1, 1994 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: REAPPOINTMENT TO KENT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Confirmation of the Mayor's re- appointment of Ron Banister to continue serving as a member of the Kent Economic Development Corporation. Mr. Banister's new appointment will continue to 12/31/97. 3. EXHIBITS: Memorandum from Mayor White 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Mayor White (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO ✓ YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended -#--- EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS• 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 3I MEMORANDUM TO: JUDY WOODS, CITY COUNCIL PRESIDENT CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: JIM WHITE, MAYOR DATE: JANUARY 28, 1994 SUBJECT: REAPPOINTMENT TO KENT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION I have recently reappointed Ron Banister to serve as a member of the Kent Economic Development Corporation. Mr. Banister's new appointment will continue to 12/31/97- 1 submit this for your confirmation. JW.jb cc: Brenda Jacober, City Clerk Kent City Council Meeting Date February 1, 1994 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: APPOINTMENTS TO KENT HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Confirmation of the Mayor's appointments of Dee Moschel, Constance Stockton, and Melvin Tate to serve as members of the Kent Human Services Commission. Constance Stockton, who has been serving the Commission as a representative of the "Service Club" category will move to the "Non -Voting Agency" representative position. She will replace Peg Mazen, whose term expired, and her new appointment will continue to 1/1/96. L010 Dee Moschel to serve as the "Service Club" representative to the Commission through her long association with Kent Soroptimists. Ms. Moschel has also served as a member of the Human Services Commission previously and was Chair for one year. She will replace Ms. Stockton and her term will continue to 1/1/96. Mme. Melvin Tate will serve in the "Regional Agency" position. He is Community Outreach Coordinator for the Kent School District and the present Chairman of the Project Lighthouse Steering Committee. He will replace Tim Clark who vacated his position when he became a Kent City Council Member. Mr. Tate's term will be in effect until 1/1/96. 3. EXHIBITS: Memorandum from Mayor White 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Mayor White - (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO ✓ YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 3J MEMORANDUM TO: JUDY WOODS, CITY COUNCIL PRESIDENT CITY COUNCIL MEBERS FROM: JIM WHITE, MAYOR DATE: JANUARY 25, 1994 SUBJECT: APPOINTMENTS TO KENT HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION I have recently appointed Dee Moschel, Constance Stockton and Melvin Tate to serve as members of the Kent Human Services Commission. Constance Stockton, who has been serving the Commission as a representative of the "Service Club" category will move to the Non -Voting Agency Representative position. She will replace Peg Mazen, whose term expired, and her new appointment will continue to 1/1/96. Dee Moschel will serve as the "Service Club" representative to the Commission through her long association with Kent Soroptimists. Ms. Moschel has also served as a member of the Human Services Commission previously and was Chair for one year. She will replace Ms. Stockton and her term will continue to 1/1/96. Mr. Melvin Tate will serve in the "Regional Agency" position. He is Community Outreach Coordinator for the Kent School District and the present Chairman of the Project Lighthouse Steering Committee. He will replace Tim Clark who vacated his position when he became a Kent City Council Member. Mr. Tate's term will be in effect until 1/1/96- I submit this for your confirmation. JW.ib cc: Jim Harris, Planning Director Lin Ball, Housing and Human Services Kent City Council Meeting Date_ February 1 1994 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: LINDENTAL MEADOWS - BILL OF SALE 2. SUMMARY ST MEN As recommended by the Public Works> Committee u orization"�o accep the bill of sa warr agreement submitted by William E. Ruth for continuous operation and maintenance of 1,086 feet of watermain, 2,070 feet of sanitary sewer, 2,336 feet of storm sewer and 740 feet of street improvements and release of bonds after expiration of the maintenance period. The project is in the vicinity of 114th Avenue SE & SE 265th Street. 3. EXHIBITS: Public Works minutes, Public Works Director memorandum and vicinity map 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT• NO YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended__ 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS• 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 3K DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS JANUARY 19, 1994 TO: PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE FROM: DON WICKSTROM RE: LINDENTAL MEADOWS - BILL OF SALE William E. Ruth, the developer of Lindental Meadows has completed the water, sanitary sewer, street, and storm sewer improvements for this project, in the vicinity of 114th Avenue SE & SE 265th Street. ACTION: Recommend the Bill of Sale be accepted and bonds released after the one year maintenance period. SE o 244TH .. ST = _ ' 1` R = „ M W W F O J .. a W a SE SE 248TH ST ` 1 W > W Ld W LLI >_ E 25. S �• :E 2M107H 51 W � A 259T H t W PL SE ND ST / /1 � � SE 252ND PLH sc 25 NT's' EAST HILL t s SE 253RCJE ST y CENTER n > a SE 252ND ST SE 254TH PL d N a F 9� Si5 JJ W -c . '< W ♦ N �5` < r p- N F "NT-MERIDIAN m F ••„ W •- ^ $E ' . HI. SCHOOL y > <20 v 1 SE 256TH ST .. .. -a'^�: N r N /' 29 28 SE 25 = p i> $ < / $.E• 51h hKENT — ` y BSH S= SCHOOL STRI r y ADMINISTRATION LDG. sE 258TH 4k sE 59TH sE 260TH 5T W SE 260THST 9�2y�TH STQCE•1, Y PL O Ro `. f Z SE 261ST 7A W \fit ST W / < ��� SEQUOIA T=; iV�} - S�QV N L� SCHOOLS_ _ .. SE W f , Atnipl�c T. `ply Cr 0 p •SE < SE 264TH STS SE 264THST 2,63¢0 SE 264TH ; s 516 5 SE 265TH QC > PL gT ^ •' _ PROJECT- LOCATION ZIWI r- O �. SE 267TH " r, w ST W °1 sE 268TH p} a iE 2GSTH - P� ST JT/W >N r < N W < ST tiE 270TH sE 270TH \ SE 270TH CSF = e w PL ` ��;• r O J w 1 SE 271ST STt=- n '• a w W t .. 29 'Y 28 SE 272ND ST SE 272X0 ST -- -------- 2ND PL 32 r" W D Yl p n W W W a a a n p a Z = w r y SE 274 N ..• W W h ~ 273f741 W N ~ Sc P', O S = 274TH ST> W < < < N ST Be c sT 274THwz < < SE 2MTH u S S r �o N h ST W re n e p1W N ll` filed a claim against the City and since that claim is filed by his attorney, we couldn't fix it even if we wanted to. Brubaker said there is a statute that says before a suit is filed with the City a claim form must be filed on the City's approved claim form. He said Kiefer did that; then he hired an attorney and filed another claim. Brubaker said we have done everything we can. Wickstrom said the Corps has concurred with the City and if we go in there now and try to change the wetland, we would be in violation with our permit with the Corps. Committee unanimously recommended that the project be accepted as complete. C> Lindental Meadows - Bill of Sale Committee unanimously recommended the bill of sale be accepted and the bond released after the one year maintenance period. R V Rest Stop on Naden Avenue Bennett said he spoke with Wickstrom on this item and Wickstrom had advised that we needed to establish a budget, verify the validity of the budget, and come up with a design. Bennett said that Jack Ball gave him a design based on 8 stalls. Wickstrom said he wanted to downsize it because there is about l0,000 sq. ft. of paved surface. He said when it goes over 5,000 sq. ft. there are water quality and detention requirements which will add substantially to the cost. Wickstrom said that we are looking at cutting it down to 5 stalls. Bennett stated that there is an R.V. jamboree coming up in September but if it gets cost prohibitive, there is enough paved area in the City to accommodate the R.V. Is rather than spending $25,000 for 5 stalls. Bennett asked that a new drawing and a detailed budget be brought back to the next.Public Works meeting. Meeting adjourned at 5:55 P.M. Kent City Council Meeting Date February 1 1994 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: KENT SPRINGS TRANSMISSION MAIN, PHASE II - ACCEPTANCE As recommended by the Public Worm s-- 2. SfJMMARY ST EMENT: e -fie contract CCommittee, uthorization to accept as—comglet `pliYi.Robison Construction, Inc. for the Kent Springs Transmission Main Phase II project, and release of retainage after receipt of State releases. 3. EXHIBITS: Public Works minutes, Public Works Director memorandum and vicinity map 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO ✓ YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended ✓ Im EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 3L DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS JANUARY 192 1994 TO: PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE FROM: DON WICKSTROM RE: KENT SPRINGS TRANSMISSION MAIN PHASE II ACCEPT AS COMPLETE This project consisted of installing approximately 7,374 feet of 30" watermain and 2,472 feet of 1811 watermain and various related appurtenances in accordance with the plans and specifications. The project was awarded to Robison Construction, Inc. for the bid amount of $1,799,993.56. The final construction cost is $1,910,635.24. The difference of 6% is a result of more material required than was originally anticipated; delay in downtime for easement acquisition and additional miscellaneous change orders, attributed to field conditions. ACTION: Recommend project be accepted as complete. ef • S.E. 274TH STREET • II ,4661 \� w�� 1vi Fpp \ I . W .. w Z �•'• i� PHASE ll\ i z w I a o� F z cQ U I w 33 2 ` 58 I �� l PHASE ---� ► u 1 I- --a f.E. 282ND STREET AM NM AIL ''U S_ t I i • .,nk o�... S.E_ 284TH �_ •` S. II � ' " STREET. PROJ - ECT' = = - -• �. LOCATION �'•• -- • • PHAS II TRANSMISSIONMAIN �1 )-j' 1_--- - -- _L—.. .. 1 �E_ 288TH STREET t1 1 e1 J1lIIT 1\I .. •• u.. KENT SPRINGS TRANSMISSION MAIN PHASE II 1 I 0 1250 2500 SCALE IN FEET PRESENT: PUBLIC WORKS CONIlV MEE JANUARY 19, 1994 PAUL MAN JIM BENNETT DON WICKSTROM TOM BRUBAKER Recycle - Request for Proposals MAY MILLER JACK BALL ROBYN BARTELT MR & MRS RUST Brubaker submitted a draft copy of the RFP to the Committee and stated that after reviewing the previous RFP and removing any ambiguities, he did add a new section of "Qualification" which asks for names and resumes of principle officers, partners and names of individuals who would actually be conducting the program. Brubaker said that the most important addition was related to whether a company has been involved in a litigation within the last five years. Brubaker asked for approval to proceed with advertising of the RFP on February 11th. He said it could be brought back to Committee for their recommendation at the February 15th Public Works meeting. He said the present extension ends at the end of March. Bennett stated that he had complete confidence in that everything that had been previously discussed, relative to the new RFP, has been included. Brubaker said if the Committee would like to make any additions or changes, they could do so prior to advertising. Committee unanimously agreed to the publication of the RFP on February 11th. Kent Springs Transmission Main Phase II Accept as Complete Wickstrom said the original amount of this project was $1,799,993.56 and the final construction cost was $1,910,635. He explained that this was primarily related to some unanticipated work and downtime associated in securing some easements. Wickstrom said this was a good project, although Charlie Kiefer has called and said his yard is still not fixed and wanted to make sure that this was known to the Committee. Wiokstrom said that Kiefer has 0 filed a claim against the City and since that claim is filed by his attorney, we couldn't fix it even if we wanted to. Brubaker said there is a statute that says before a suit is filed with the City a claim form must be filed on the City's approved claim form. He said Kiefer did that; then he hired an attorney and filed another claim. Brubaker said we have done everything we can. Wickstrom said the Corps has concurred with the City and if we go in there now and try to change the wetland, we would be in violation with our permit with the Corps. Committee unanimously recommended that the project be accepted as complete. Lindental Meadows - Bill of Sale Committee unanimously recommended the bill of sale be accepted and the bond released after the one year maintenance period. R.V. Rest Stop on Naden Avenue Bennett said he spoke with Wickstrom on this item and Wickstrom had advised that we needed to establish a budget, verify the validity of the budget, and come up with a design. Bennett said that Jack Ball gave him a design based on 8 stalls. Wickstrom said he wanted to downsize it because there is about 10,000 sq. ft. of paved surface. He said when it goes over 5,000 sq. ft. there are water quality and detention requirements which will add substantially to the cost. Wickstrom said that we are looking at cutting it down to 5 stalls. Bennett stated that there is an R.V. jamboree coming up in September but if it gets cost prohibitive, there is enough paved area in the City to accommodate the R.V.'s rather than spending $25,000 for 5 stalls. Bennett asked that a new drawing and a detailed budget be brought back to the next Public Works meeting. Meeting adjourned at 5:55 P.M. QI Kent City Council Meeting lv Date February 1. 1994 V� Category Other Business 1. SUBJECT: CHES UT RIDGE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION CPA 93-2 - RESOLUTION 2. SUMMARY STAT ENT: On January 18, 1994, the Council tabled this item- it February 1 so that the Chestnut Ridge Zoning and Compre nsive Plan Map Designation would be in conformity with one a other. During its January 18 meeting, the Council made chan s to the proposed initial zoning; consequently, the need to c ange the comprehensive plan map. T„�er_ �P�� Exhibit A depicts th newest proposed comprehensive plan map amendment. The atmmemo discusses a single family overlay for Chestnut Ridge that was part of the Planning Commission's recommendation but not included in the Council's action on the matter. The resolution includes the amendment to the single family overlay,,as recommended by the Planning Commission. 3. EXHIBITS: A memo, resolution including Exhibit A, a City Council minutes of 1/18/94 Cr 5. [IN 7. RECOMMENDED BY: City Council (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: CITY COUNCIL ACTION: NO YES Not Recommended CouncilmemberbDl�_mov s, Councilmember_&VII) —seconds to adopt Resolution No. IWft for the Chestnut Ridge Annexation Area (#CPA -93-2) amending the city-wide comprehensive land use map as depicted in Exhibit A and amending the single family overlay. DISCUSSION: ACTION. 4* cil D Council Agenda Item No. 4A CITY OF KENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT (206) 859-3390 MEMORANDUM February 1, 1994 MEMO TO: MAYOR JIM WHITE AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: JAMES P. HARRIS, PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: SINGLE FAMILY OVERLAY FOR THE CHESTNUT RIDGE ANNEXATION (#CPA -93-2) The Planning Department's October 25, 1993 staff report for the Chestnut Ridge initial comprehensive plan map designation, recommended that, in addition to the Alternative Plan Amendment #1, the Single Family Designated Area Overlay map be amended to include the Chestnut Ridge annexation. When the Planning Commission voted to recommend Alternative #1 to the City Council, they did not also recommend the single family overlay. However, upon inquiry by Fred Satterstrom the Commission thought the single family overlay was part of Alternative #1 and thus was part of their recommendation. Further research indicates that the single family overlay was never part of Alternative #1 and for it to be part of the Commission's recommendation to the Council a vote to include it as part of their Commission's recommendation would need to have been taken. It is clear from the Commission records that they intended that the single family overlay be part of their recommendation. Therefore, staff recommends that the Council add the single family overlay to the Comprehensive Plan map at the same time the land use change is made. Staff will be present to explain this proposal. JPH/mp:pc.l cc: Fred N. Satterstrom, Planning Manager RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, amending the City- wide Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map (CPA -93- 2) to designate the entire Chestnut Ridge annexation area as Single Family (SF), as depicted in Alternative No. 1 and as amended by the City Council on January 18, 1994, and to amend the Single Family Designated Area Overlay Map to include this area. WHEREAS, the area known as Chestnut Ridge was officially annexed to the City of Kent on May 16, 1993; and WHEREAS, the annexation of Chestnut Ridge requires that the City amend its Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Map to include the newly annexed area; and WHEREAS, the City of Kent held two public hearings before the Planning Commission on October 25, 1993 and November 81 1993 to allow public testimony on the zoning designation for the Chestnut Ridge annexation area; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the proposed plan amendment changing the City-wide Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map to designate the entire Chestnut Ridge annexation area as Single Family (SF), as depicted in Alternative No. 1 (Exhibit "B"); and to amend the Single Family Designated Area Overlay Map to include the Chestnut Ridge Annexation Area; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Kent took public testimony at a public hearing on December 7, 1993, and considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, on January 18, 1994, the City Council took additional public testimony at a public hearing; and WHEREAS, following its hearing on January 18, 1994, the City Council amended the Planning Commission's recommendation for approval of Alternative No. 1 and adopted as amended the Comprehensive Land Use Plan as depicted in Exhibit A. WHEREAS, on February 1, 1994, the City Council considered the need to simultaneously amend the Single Family Designated Area overlay Map to include the Chestnut Ridge Annexation Area as recommended by the Planning Commission following its hearings; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City-wide Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map is hereby amended to designate the entire Chestnut Ridge Annexation Area as, Single Family (SF), as depicted in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Section 2. The Single Family Designate Area Overlay Map is hereby amended to include the Chestnut Ridge Annexation Area. 2 Passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington this day of , 1994. Concurred in by the Mayor of the City of Kent, this day of , 1994. JIM WHITE, MAYOR ATTEST: BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: ROGER A. LUBOVICH, CITY ATTORNEY I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of Resolution No. , passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, the day of , 1994. chestnut.res BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK 3 (SEAL) VALLET EREEWAT VALLEY f9_` old 020 va V/ Z c i c cc /cz) z 0 Q% � 1 r- x z r C mi;l --A m O ) � � z > W C C 7 r� p m m MEREig UK MO.-➢ � m m z CD D CHESTNUT RIDGE COMPlaEHEidSIVE PLAN ALTERNATIVE 1 "Exhibit B.. SF I SINGLE FAMILY 1 UNIT PER ACRE SF 6 SINGLE FAMILY 4-6 UNITS/ACRE CITY LIMITS ANNEXATION AREA DESIGNATION BOUNDARY January 18, 1994 ANNEXATION traffic. John Kastien, 20609 - 94th Avenue ZONING South, noted that he endorses the RA zoning and that the needs of the community should be. addressed rather than the needs of the investor. Allen Black clarified for Kastien that he was not suggesting the change of RA zoning at this point but that he was asking Council and the Planning Department to give consideration for a future planned unit development zoning ordinance which the City used to have. He noted that zoning is something the population and community want, but tools are needed to do the best job possible and that it's important for a differ- entiation to be made. There were no further comments from the audience. WOODS MOVED to close the public hearing. Houser seconded. Planning Director Harris noted that if the Council's motion is to approve the Planning Commission's recommendation, the motion should include "and direct the City Attorney to draw up the necessary ordinance". The motion to close the public hearing then carried. WOODS MOVED to amend the Planning Commission's recom- mendation of approval of the Chestnut Ridge Annexation Area initial zoning designation as outlined in Alternative #1 to make the R1-9.6 now RA, and to direct the City Attorney to pre- pare the necessary ordinance. Mann seconded and the motion carried. Lubovich noted that Consent Calendar - Item 3D regarding a resolution for the Chestnut Ridge Comprehensive Plan Map Desig- nation needs to be pulled, amended and brought back to the next Council meeting along with the ordinance for the zoning. COMPREHENSIVE (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3D) PLAN MAP (REMOVED BY THE CITY ATTORNEY) DESIGNATION Chestnut Ridge Comprehensive Plan Map Designa- tion. City Attorney Lubovich noted that the Chestnut Ridge zoning and Comprehensive Plan Map Designation need to go hand-in-hand, and if the zoning is changed then the Comprehensive Plan has to be changed also. WOODS MOVED to table this item until the next Council meeting. Johnson seconded and the motion carried. 9 Kent City Council Meeting Date February 1, 1994 Category Other Business 1. SUBJECT: CHESTNUT RIDGE INITIAL ZONING AZ -93-1 - ORDINANCE 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: On January 18, 1994, the City Council amended the Planning Commission's Alternative 1 recommendation to change the R1-9.6 designation to RA for the Chestnut Ridge Annexation Initial Zoning (AZ -93-1). The proposed ordinance incorporates the Council's amendment) Exhibit A indicates the changes. 3 4 5. No VB EXHIBITS: Ordinance and City Council minutes of 1/18/94 RECOMMENDED BY: City Council (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO ✓ YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended ✓ EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: CITY COUNCIL ACTION: / Councilmember "66 moves, Councilmember_ (OA-fJ seconds t adopt Ordinance No. 315q designating zoning for the entire C�stnut Ridge Annexation Area (#AZ -93-1) as single family. D IIIkcUISOSP3, ON: h o ACTION: C10 Council Agenda Item No. 4B ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, designating zoning for the entire Chestnut Ridge Annexation Area (#AZ -93-1) as Single Family as depicted in Exhibit "A". WHEREAS, the area known as Chestnut Ridge was officially annexed to the City of Kent on May 16, 1993; and WHEREAS, the Kent City Code requires that initial zoning of a recently annexed area must occur within six months of the annexation; and WHEREAS, the City Council at its September 7, 1993 meeting adopted Ordinance No. 3131 providing for a 90 day extension for the zoning designation for the Chestnut Ridge Annexation Area to allow appropriate citizen participation and applicable SEPA reviews; and ` WHEREAS, the City of Kent held two public hearings I, before the Planning Commission on October 25, 1993 and November 8, 1993 to allow public testimony on the zoning designation for the Chestnut Ridge Annexation Area; and WHEREAS, the City Council held two public hearings on l December 7, 1993 and January 18, 1994 to allow further public testimony on the zoning designation for the Chestnut Ridge Annexation Area and to consider the recommendation of the Planning Commission; and u WHEREAS, following its hearing on January 18, 1994, 's recommendation the City Council amended the Planning Commission he Chestnut Ridge Annexation area to designate for approval of t the proposed R1-9.6 zoning designation to RA zoning as depicted in Exhibit A; NOW, THEREFORE, it THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section The Chestnut Ridge Annexation Area is designated single family residential, with RA zoning running north of 212th Street and East of 92nd Avenue South as depicted in Exhibit A, and R1-7.2 zoning for the remaining annexation area as depicted in Exhibit A. Section 2. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect thevalidity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance. f1` Section 3, Effective Date. This ordinance shall take days from and after its 1, effect and be in force thirty (3o) law. I passage, approval and publication as provided by i JIM WHITE, MAYOR l 2 ATTEST: 'I �I BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: ROGER A. LUBOVICH, CITY ATTORNEY PASSED _ APPROVED PUBLISHED day of _ day of day of 1994. 1994. 1994. I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No. , passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the City of Kent as hereon indicated. chestnut.ord (SEAL) BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK 3 VRLLET FREEWRY I ' N4, Z� DN Z O ? (7 U) C C z7 V) m m z C Z r m z --i o m O 0O D m �7 D r z D C z J > D MaRES91- �� y � p m m n U7 p fJ m C r Z 70 D r m Kent City Council Meeting Date February 1 1994 Category Other Business 1. SUBJECT: CARPINITO BUSINESS PARK REZONE RZ-93-3 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: This date has been set for a public meeting to consider the Hearing Examiner's recommendation of approval of an application to rezone 3.0 acres from GWC, Gateway Commercial, to CM -1, Commercial Manufacturing. The property is located on the south side of So. 222nd Street, approximately 250 feet east of 84th Ave. South-(-E�n 3. EXHIBITS: St�ff report; Findings and Recommendations 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Hearin Examiner (Committee, S aff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. M 1rJF SONNEL IMPACT: NO YES : Recommended. Not Recommended SOURCE OF FUNDS: %. L L l v�- f1 ^ Councilmember_�move�l, CouTrci3'riiRTeiber `� seconds to accept/F-G� `;"' the findings of the Hearing Examiner, and to adoptee+gym a; the Hearing Examiner's recommendation of approval of the Carpinito Business Park Rezone RZ-93-31 and to direct the City Attorney to prepare the necessary ordinance. bet&nert SCc0V%&-a -rvA- `v- {'&v, DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 4C CITY OF J_k)1Lg2 nT CITY OF KENT OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER (206) 859-3390 Theodore P. Hunter Hearing Examiner df9®IIC Std FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION FILE NO: CARPINITO BUSINESS PARK #RZ-93-3 APPLICANT: MARK W. STIEFEL REQUEST: A request to rezone 3.0 acres from GWC, Gateway Commercial, to CM -1, Commercial Manufacturing. LOCATION: The subject property is located on the south side of S. 222nd Street, approximately 250 feet east of 84th Avenue S. (East Valley Highway). APPLICATION FILED: September 8, 1993 DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE ISSUED: September 30, 1993 MEETING DATE: December 1, 1993 RECOMMENDATION ISSUED: December 8, 1993 RECOMMENDATION: APPROVAL STAFF REPRESENTATIVE: Fred N. Satterstrom, Planning Department PUBLIC TESTIMONY: Mark Stiefel, applicant Other Dale Lewis WRITTEN TESTIMONY: None INTRODUCTION After due consideration of all the evidence presented at public hearing on the date - indicated above, and following an unaccompanied personal inspection of the subject property and surrounding area by the Hearing Examiner at a time prior to the public 1 Findings and Recommendation Carpinito Business Park #RZ-93-3 hearing, the following findings, conclusions and recommendation are entered by the Hearing Examiner on this application. SUMMARY OF PROCEEDINGS 1. The application for a rezone was filed on August 31, 1993. The applicant, Stiefel Engineering, on behalf of the owners, the Carpinitos, requests a rezone of 3 acres of property from GWC, Gateway Commercial, to CM -1, Commercial Manufacturing. 2. An environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS), without conditions, was issued on September 30, 1993. No comments were received and the DNS was not appealed. 3. A public hearing on the rezone request was held on December 1, 1993. Notice of the public hearing was properly given by posting, mailing and publication. At the public hearing, city staff presented a recommendation if favor of the rezone without conditions. Mr. Mark Stiefel spoke in support of the rezone request on behalf of the owners of the property. Mr. Dale Lewis also testified at the public hearing. Mr. Lewis raised concerns about stormwater drainage, noise and traffic associated with any subsequent development of the site. He presented information on traffic and stormwater drainage problems based on his residency of thirty years in a home across from the site. He did not voice opposition to the proposal, but indicated his concerns and requested they be addressed. Mr. Stiefel responded to his concerns and agreed to work with Mr. Lewis in developing impact mitigation programs so that the information Mr. Lewis has can be taken into account. FINDINGS 1. The site is located on the south side of S. 222nd Street approximately 250 feet east of 84th Avenue South. 2. The site is approximately 3 acres of a 4.5 acre parcel of land. The city has approved a short subdivision of the parcel into four building lots and an open space tract for storm drainage purposes. The western portion of the site of approximately 1.5 acres would remain a GWC zone, Gateway Commercial, if the applicant's proposal is approved. The CM -1 zoning designation would apply to the remainder of the parcel. 2 Findings and Recommendation Carpinito Business Park #RZ-93-3 3. The existing zoning of the site is GWC. Property to the north of the site is zoned GWC and CM -1. Property to the east of the site is zoned CM -1. Properties to the south and west are zoned GWC. The City-wide and Valley Floor Plan Comprehensive Plan Maps both designate the site as I, Industrial. 4. The site is currently vacant land that is flat with only minimal vegetation. Land use in the vicinity of the site includes a single family residence, a fire extinguisher supplier and a contractor's yard to the north; a mini -warehouse facility to the east; vacant land to the west; and a motel and restaurant (Cypress Inn) to the south. 5. There is no project proposal associated with the application for the rezone. Thus, there are no traffic impacts directly related to the rezone request. Typically, however, industrial development generates less traffic than commercial traffic. The amount of traffic that may be associated with any subsequent development of the site is likely to be less if the rezone is approved. 6. The GWC zoning district was created and applied to the site in 1989. At that time, it was believed by the city staff that commercial activity would rapidly occur along the 84th Avenue corridor. Since that time, city staff has recognized that the expected level of commercial development has not occurred. In addition, it is now recognized that some of the deep lots created by the GWC zoning are not suitable for the 84th Street corridor. 7. No one testified in opposition to this rezone. CONCLUSIONS Jurisdiction and Authority 1 . The Hearing Examiner has jurisdiction to hold a public hearing on this quasi- judicial rezone, and to issue a written recommendation for final action to the Council, pursuant to RCW 35A.63.170 and Chapters 2.32 and 15.09 of the Kent City Code. A public hearing was held on December 1, 1993 after proper notice had been given. 2. Section 15.09.050 (A)(3) of the Kent Zoning Code sets forth the standards and criteria the Examiner must use to evaluate a request for a rezone. A request for a rezone shall only be granted if: a. The proposed rezone is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; 3 Findings and Recommendation Carpinito Business Park #RZ-93-3 b. The proposed rezone and subsequent development of the site would be compatible with development in the vicinity; C. The proposed rezone will not unduly burden the transportation system in the vicinity of the property with significant adverse impacts which cannot be mitigated; d. Circumstances have changed substantially since the establishment of the current zoning district to warrant the proposed rezone; e. The proposed rezone will not adversely affect the health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Kent. Based on the Findings specified above, the Examiner makes the following conclusions: 3. Consistency with Comprehensive Plan CONCLUSION 1: The proposed rezone is consistent with the both the City- wide Comprehensive Plan and the Valley Floor Plan Comprehensive Plan map designations and policies. The proposed rezone is consistent with the map designations of I, Industrial. The policies in both plans encourage diverse industrial developments in suitable locations, in -fill development of industrial areas and controlled economic growth with orderly physical development. The proposal retains the GWC zone along the 84th Street corridor and makes available the back parcels for light manufacturing use. This is the type of development envisioned by the comprehensive plans. 4. Compatibility. with Development in the Vicinity CONCLUSIONS 2: The proposed rezone is compatible with development in the vicinity of the site. There have been many changes in the area over the past 30 years at testified to by Mr. Lewis. Changes include increased commercial development in the area surrounding the site. While the proposed rezone is not compatible with the single family residence, nearly all property in the area is in commercial or light manufacturing use. Specific development proposals will undergo environmental review for any traffic, noise, or stormwater impacts to surrounding properties. At the time of environmental review, the compatibility M Findings and Recommendation Carpinito Business Park #RZ-93-3 of the specific use, especially with the single family residence and the motel, can be addressed. The applicant's representative agreed to do this during the public hearing. This will help ensure compatibility of any subsequent development with existing development in the vicinity. 5. Burden on Transportation System CONCLUSION 3: The proposed rezone would not unduly burden the transportation system The proposed rezone from GWC to CM -1 would mean less potential impact from traffic as CM -1 permitted uses typically generate less traffic than permitted GWC uses. Since no development proposal is associated with this rezone, there is no direct traffic impact. Traffic impacts can be addressed as part of the environmental review of a specific proposal. 6. Change of Circumstances CONCLUSION 4: Circumstances have changed substantially since the establishment of the Gateway Commercial zone to warrant the proposed rezone. As noted in the Findings, the perceived potential in 1989 for commercial development along the 84th Street corridor has not, in fact, taken place. The site retains a GWC parcel along 84th Street, but makes available additional area for light manufacturing. This recognizes the change of circumstances in development patterns that has occurred since 1989. 7. Health Safety and Welfare of the Citizens of Kent CONCLUSION 5: The proposed rezone would not adversely affect the general welfare of the citizens of Kent in the area surrounding the proposed rezone. Any impacts associated with a specific development - such as increased traffic, stormwater runoff, or noise - can be addressed at the time of environmental review of a specific proposal. It is more sensible to place conditions on specific proposals than on approval of a rezone. Conditional rezones are difficult to track administratively and may not address the impacts associated with a specific development proposal. The applicant's willingness to involve citizens in the impact mitigation process will help ensure that the proposed rezone will not adversely impact the citizens of Kent. It should also be noted that the city has placed conditions on the short plat approval that address traffic, 5 Findings and Recommendation Carpinito Business Park #RZ-93-3 stormwater runoff and utility impacts. These conditions will also help ensure that there are no negative impacts on the citizens in the vicinity of the rezone. RECOMMENDATION Based on the Findings and Conclusions specified above, the Examiner recommends the proposed rezoned be APPROVED. Dated this 8th day of December, 1993 THEODORE PAUL HUNTER Hearing Examiner APPEALS FROM HEARING EXAMINER DECISIONS. Reauest of Reconsideration Any aggrieved person may request a reconsideration of a decision by the Hearing Examiner if either (a) a specific error of fact, law, or judgment can be identified or (b) new evidence is available which was not available at the time of the hearing. Reconsideration requests should be addressed to: Hearing Examiner, 220 Fourth Avenue S., Kent, WA 98032. Reconsiderations are answered in writing by the Hearing Examiner. Notice of Right to Appeal The decision of the Hearing Examiner is final unless a written appeal to the Council is filed by a party within 14 days of the decision. The appeal must be filed with the City Clerk. Usually, new information cannot be raised on appeal. All relevant information and arguments should be presented at the public hearing before the City Council. A recommendation by the Hearing Examiner to the City Council can also be appealed. A recommendation is sent to the City Council for a final decision; however, a public hearing is not held unless an appeal is filed. c:rz93Ifin 109 Findings and Recommendation Carpinito Business Park #RZ-93-3 STATE OF WASHINGTON } COUNTY OF SS THE UNDERSIGNED, BEING FIRST DULY SWORN, ON OATH STATES: THAT ON THIS DAY AFFIANT DEPOSITED IN THE MAILS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA A PROPERLY STAMPER AND ADDRESSED ENVELOPE WEIMD M THE ar�,eS �} Ye -c OF APPLICATION, CONVJM A COPY OF THE DOCUMENT ON WHICH THISAFFIMAPP(A71B, —i-�� cls"-" ,�LIBSCUMANDMOIW METHIS�-DAY OF NOTARY RESIO� Myftyr mE>wn 7 CITY OF KENT KENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT (206) 859-3390 '�IIcn� STAFF REPORT FOR LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER MEETING OF DECEMBER 11 1993 AT 3:00 PM FILE NO: CARPINITO BUSINESS PARK REZONE #RZ-93-3 APPLICANT: Mark W. Stiefel Stiefel Engineering 22312 113th Avenue SE Kent, WA 98031 REQUEST: A request to rezone 3.0 acres from GWC, Gateway Commercial, to CM -11 Commercial Manufacturing. STAFF REPRESENTATIVE: Fred N. Satterstrom, AICP Planning Manager STAFF RECOMMENDATION: APPROVAL I. GENERAL INFORMATION A. Description of the Proposal The applicant proposes to rezone approximately 3.0 acres from the current zoning of GWC, Gateway Commercial, to CM -1, Commercial Manufacturing. Preliminary site development plans submitted with the rezone application indicate a future building of 38,200 square feet. B. Location The subject property is located on the south side of S. 222nd Street approximately 250 feet east of 84th Avenue South (East Valley Highway). C. Size of Property The rezone proposal comprises approximately 3.0 acres of a 4.5 acre site. The applicant has submitted, and the City has approved, an application for preliminary short subdivision of the site which would create four (4) 1 Staff Report Carpinito Business Park Rezone #RZ-93-3 building lots and an open space tract for detention and storm drainage purposes. The westerly lot in this short plat coincides with that portion of the site which the applicants desires to remain GWC. The easterly three lots coincide with the portion proposed for CM -1 zoning. D. Zonincr The existing zoning of the subject site is GWC. Property to the north of the proposed site is zoned GWC and CM -1. Property to the east of the site is zoned CM -1. Properties to the south and west of the site are zoned GWC. E. Land Use The area proposed for the rezone is currently vacant. The remaining portion of the site lying to the west is also vacant. Land use in the vicinity of the rezone is mixed. Along. S. 222nd Street on the north side are located a residence, a fire extinguisher supplier, and a contractor's storage yard. To the east of the site is a public storage mini -warehouse facility. Adjacent to the site on the south side is the Cypress Inn, a motel and restaurant development constructed in 1987. F. History The subject property was annexed into the City of Kent on August 31, 1955 as part of a 900 -acre annexation. The subject property and adjacent properties lying along 84th Avenue South were rezoned from manufacturing zoning to Gateway Commercial zoning in 1989 as part of an area - wide zoning action initiated by the City (#CPZ-89-1). II. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS A. Environmental Assessment A final Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) was issued on the proposed rezone on September 30, 1993 (#ENV -93-44). There were no conditions attached to the DNS. 2 Staff Report Carpinito Business Park Rezone #RZ-93-3 B. Significant Physical Features The site is generally flat and is devoid of any significant vegetation. The site has been graded in preparation for development. C. Significant Social Features 1. Street System The subject property has access to S. 222nd Street which is classified as an Industrial Street. The existing public right-of-way width of S. 222nd Street is 16 -feet. The road is paved but not improved with curbs, gutters, sidewalks, enclosed drainage, nor other street appurtenances. The average daily traffic count is less than 1000 vehicle trips per day. 2. Water System An existing 10 -inch water main line is available to serve the subject property. 3. Sanitary Sewer System An existing 8 -inch sanitary sewer is available to serve the subject property. 4. Stormwater System A stormwater system is necessary to accommodate anticipated development of the subject property. 5. LIDS No Local Improvement Districts affect the subject property. III. CONSULTED DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES The following departments and agencies were advised of this application: Chief Administrative Officer City Attorney Director of Public Works Chief of Police Parks & Recreation Director Fire Chief 3 Staff Report Carpinito Business Park Rezone #RZ-93-3 Building Official City Clerk Washington State DOT In addition to the above, all persons owning property which lies within 200 -feet of the site were notified of the application and of the public hearing. Staff comments have been incorporated in the staff report where applicable. IV. PLANNING DEPARTMENT REVIEW A. Comprehensive Plan The following is a review of the City-wide Comprehensive Plan and the Valley Floor Subarea Plan as they relate to the subject property. 1. City-wide Comprehensive Plan The City-wide Comprehensive Plan consists of both the Comprehensive Plan Map and the written goals, objectives, and policies. The Comprehensive Plan Map designates the proposed rezone site as Industrial. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OVERALL GOAL: PROMOTE CONTROLLED ECONOMIC GROWTH WITH ORDERLY PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT, RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND PRESERVATION. GOAL 1: Promote diverse industrial development in industrially developed areas. GOAL 2: Assure retail and commercial developments are in suitable locations. Planning Department Comment: Prior to being zoned GWC, Gateway Commercial, the subject site was zoned CM -11 Commercial Manufacturing. Properties located to the north, east, and south of the site on the east side of 84th Avenue South were also zoned CM -1. Properties to the west across 84th Avenue S. were zoned M2, Limited Industrial. In general, the land uses in the surrounding area were mixed, with industrial 4 Staff Report Carpinito Business Park Rezone #RZ-93-3 and heavy commercial uses interspersed with several single-family residences which were in a state of decline. In 1988, a comprehensive plan amendment was adopted for the East Valley area after a study of land use trends. The amendment designated a general commercial strip along both sides of 84th Avenue S. from S. 212th Street to the SR 167 overpass. The exact boundaries for the commercial district were established after a lengthy analysis of properties fronting 84th Avenue S. and considerable input from property owners. The resultant GWC zoning boundary was a compromise between existing lot dimensions and individual owners' intentions. The purpose of the GWC district, as outlined in Section 15.04.195 of the Kent Zoning Code, is to provide "retail commercial uses appropriate along major vehicular corridors." The proposed rezone does not adversely impact the intent of the GWC zone because approximately 250 -feet of property fronting on 84th Avenue S. will remain available for commercial development. The portion of land lying west of the rezone site which fronts 84th Avenue S. is more suitable for commercial development. Because of signage requirements and the need for visibility from passing traffic, a commercial strip as deep as the existing lot (i.e., 780 -feet) creates some barriers for commercial development. 2. Valley Floor Plan The Valley Floor Plan Map designates the subject site as Industrial Park. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT OVERALL GOAL: PROMOTE CONTROLLED ECONOMIC GROWTH WITH ORDERLY PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT, RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND PRESERVATION. GOAL 1: Promote in -fill development of industrially developed areas. Objective 1: Minimize unnecessary public improvements and provide efficient municipal services. 61 Staff Report Carpinito Business Park Rezone #RZ-93-3 Policy 7: Areas zoned for urban development shall be compact rather than scattered or strung out in linear patterns along arterial streets which would interfere with the utility and integrity of lands that are separated by the strip development. Strip developments also typically interfere with the capacity and safety of arterial streets serving them if each land use has separate access. Planning Department Comment: The proposed rezone is requested in order to establish new industrial building space on a portion of the lot. Approval of the rezone would not result in separation of land or strip development. B. Standards and Criteria for a Rezone Request The following standards and criteria (Kent Zoning Code, Section 15.09.050) are used by the Hearing Examiner and City Council to evaluate a request for a rezone. Such an amendment may only be granted if the City Council determines that the request is consistent with these standards and criteria. 1. The proposed rezone is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Planning Department Comment_ The proposed rezone is generally consistent with both the City-wide Comprehensive Plan Map and the Valley Floor Subarea Plan Map designations. The map designation of both plans is for industrial use, and the proposed rezone would change the zoning from commercial/retail zoning to industrial/light manufacturing zoning. The proposed rezone is also consistent with the intent of plan policies, as discussed in Section IV.A of this report. 2 Staff Report Carpinito Business Park Rezone #RZ-93-3 2. The proposed rezone and subsequent development of the site would be compatible with development in the vicinity. Planning Department Comment: The proposed rezone should not have an adverse impact on development in the area. Subsequent development will need to be reviewed through SEPA for potential impacts and those impacts, if any, will need to be mitigated. As mentioned earlier in this report, several lots in the vicinity are already being used for industrial or heavy commercial purposes. The single-family residences in the area are in a transition phase, gradually being phased out of an emerging commercial area. The motel (Cypress Inn) to the south of the rezone site is the only source of concern here. Subsequent development of the rezone site should be sensitive to the motel and its night-time clientele. This consideration may be addressed through the environmental review (SEPA) of subsequent development proposals for the rezone site. 3. The proposed rezone will not unduly burden the transportation system in the vicinity of the property with significant adverse impacts which cannot be mitigated. Planning Department Comment• As stated in the environmental review report for the proposed rezone (#ENV -93-44), the rezoning of this property to CM -1 will not directly affect the transportation system. However, any development that takes place as a result of this rezone will trigger traffic mitigation measures at the time a SEPA determination is made concerning a particular project. Several strategies for mitigation were outlined in the environmental review report for the Carpinito Rezone and are part of the SEPA record. It is the position of the Public Works Department that the implementation of these strategies would adequately mitigate the impacts of development under CM -1 zoning. It should be noted here that while several roadway improvements would be necessitated by subsequent development of the site, industrial development generates less traffic than commercial development and, therefore, represents less of a problem in terms of traffic impacts. VA Staff Report Carpinito Business Park Rezone IRZ-93-3 4. Circumstances have changed substantially since the establishment of the current zoning district to warrant the proposed rezone. Planning Department Comment: The GWC zoning district was first created and applied to property in the 84th Avenue Corridor in 1989. As mentioned earlier in this report, the GWC zoning boundary decision was a compromise between existing lot lines and the real or perceived potential for commercial use. Since that time, several rezone requests from GWC back to industrial zoning have been initiated by property owners in the 84th Avenue corridor. These rezones include Kent East Corporate Park (1990), Bishop (1991), and Venture 84 (1992). All of these rezone applications were approved by the City in part because of a recognition of the over - speculation of commercial potential in the 84th Avenue corridor. 5. The proposed rezone will not adversely affect the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Kent. Planning Department Comment: The proposed rezone is consistent with the intent of the City-wide Comprehensive Plan, the Valley Floor Plan and meets the standards of other City codes and ordinances. As a result the rezone proposal will not adversely affect the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of Kent. Subsequent development of the site will be reviewed during the SEPA and permitting stages to ensure compliance with applicable development standards. V. CITY STAFF RECOMMENDATION Upon review of the merits of this request and the Zoning Code criteria for granting a rezone, the City staff recommends APPROVAL of the Carpinito Business Park rezone request. KENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT November 17, 1993 c: x933. rpt City of Kent - Planning Department F r J s 216TH ST > ; > i ¢ 't s i m 7 218TH ST � f r f' ¢ 0 m; m t 222ND ST ci / � i I LLJ iL > ¢l r � S 228TH 57 P !! IS 228TH ST S 228TH LU > J t'r i; n z N � In fnr > >i > �p 01 t NpVRC LN mm S 232NN m. APPLICATION NAME: Carpinito Business Park NUMBER: #RZ-93-3 REQUEST: Rezone Vicinity Map DATE: Dec. 1, 1993 LEGEND Application site Railroad tracks Kent City Limits City of Kent - Planning Department APPLICATION NAME NUMBER: #RZ-93-3 REQUEST: Rezone Zoning / Topography Carpinito Business Park DATE: Dec. 1, 1993 LEGEND 0 Application site ® Zoning boundary Kent City Limits A City of Kent - Planning Department RESIDENTIAL FARRELL FIRE EXTINGUISHER CO. CONTRACTOR STORAGE YARD RESIDENCE SOUTH 222nd STREET O IANpSCARF UNpSURE AIC PAVING ITYR i _ I W z I I�IIII Z - ONE FTORY < _ -- 0 1 — L BUILDING 'A' R. _ EZ D f {FI 16.920 s.f. w V ? p; IS O C S H I G H n Z L MRFMG •MCARS — RLDG. Ni .IY > „- — ONE. STORY _ r _ 'B' _ w a BUILDING -- i 33.200 s.f. MIIRIMG lE CARS _. �� 0 ELDG HT.. 11 - — QD pRIVE IN DRIVE IN - Toa CYPRESS INN APPLICATION NAME: Carpinito Business Park NUMBER: #RZ-93-3 REQUEST: Rezone Site Plan DATE: Dec. 1, 1993 LEGEND Application site Railroad tracks Kent City Limits �dy Kent City Council Meeting Date 'February 1, 1994 Category Other Business 1. SUBJECT: CEDAR MEADOWS FINAL PLAT FSU -90-4 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: This date has been set for a public meeting to consider an application for the Cedar Meadows Final Plat #FSU -90-4. The subject property is 3.5 acres in size and is located at S.E. 228th Place and 116th Ave. S.E. The Council approved the Cedar Meadows Preliminary Plat SU -90-4 on December 4, 1990. 3. EXHIBITS: Staff memo, map and City Council minutes of 12/4/90 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Staff (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO Ll� YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: )) np Councilmember VU moves, Councilmember �)O-VDaa seconds approve the Cedar Meadows Final Plat #FSU -90-4, as recommended by staff. DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 4D . KENT CITY OF KENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT (206) 859-3390 MEMORANDUM February 1, 1994 MEMO TO: MAYOR JIM WHITE AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: JAMES P. HARRIS, PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: CEDAR MEADOWS FINAL PLAT (#FSU -90-4) On December 4, 1990 the City Council approved the Cedar Meadows Preliminary Subdivision No. SU -90-4, a 14 -lot plus park residential single family residential plat. The site is approximately 3.5 acres in size and is located at SE 228th Place and 116th Avenue SE. The property is zoned R1-7.2. Thirteen conditions were part of the Council's approval. The applicant has now complied with these conditions as listed below and has made an application for the final plat. Staff recommends approval of this application. A. PRIOR TO OR IN CONJUNCTION WITH RECORDATION OF FINAL PLAT: 1. The final plat mylar or linen shall show a dedication of property (minimum size of 7,200 square feet) as common open space for the subdivision. The open space dedication shall be on the southern portion of the subject property; the exact boundary of the dedication shall be determined by the Planning Director upon submittal of an accurate tree plan for the site. 2. The final plat mylar or linen shall bear a notation which states that development on all lots shall comply with City of Kent solar setback regulations. 3. The final plat mylar or linen shall bear a notation which states that an accurate tree plan shall be required prior to the issuance of any development permits for the lots. Further, an accurate tree plan identifying all trees with a caliper of six -inches or greater shall be submitted to the Planning Department for approval prior to issuance of any grading permits for road or other work associated with the subdivision. 4. Obtain City or appropriate utility district approval of detailed engineering drawings and construct or bond for the following: a. Sanitary Sewer: Extend gravity sanitary sewer system capable of serving all lots and any adjacent service areas. b. Water: Extend public water system to meet domestic and fire flow requirements of all lots. C. Storm System: Extend the public storm water system to service the plat and any adjacent tributary areas. CEDAR MEADOWS FINAL PLAT (#FSU -90-4) February 11 1994 Page 2 d. Cul-de-sac: Provide full street improvements to proposed south 228th Place, including an asphalt paved roadway 28 feet in width from curb to curb, curb and gutter, sidewalks along the frontage all lots within the plat, street lights, storm drainage, underground utilities, street signs, and related appurtenances. The cul-de-sac turnaround shall have a curb return radius of 45 feet and a right-of-way radius of at least 50 feet. e. 116th Avenue: Widen and improve the west half of 116th Avenue Southeast for the entire portion abutting the subject property. Improvements will include asphalt paving 18 feet in width as measured from the street centerline to face of curb, curb and gutter, sidewalks, street lighting,storm drainage, underground utilities, and related appurtenances. Curb return radii shall be 35 feet at the intersection of South 228th Place and 116th Avenue Southeast. f. Rights-of-way: Dedicate all necessary right-of-way and provide all necessary easements both on-site and off-site for the above improvements. g. SEPA: Comply with all applicable SEPA conditions. As part of preparing the detailed analysis of existing drainage conditions and recommended improvements (as the follow-up to the June 6, 1990 Drainage Report), the applicant shall notify all parties who testified at the public hearing (names and addresses to be supplied by the Office of the Hearing Examiner) of the follow-up report and allow an opportunity to comment on it (at least five days) for the purpose of supplying additional information on drainage conditions and necessary improvements. B. PRIOR TO OR IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE ISSUANCE OF A DEVELOPMENT PERMIT ON ANY LOT: 1. Complete the construction of all improvements required as SEPA conditions and plat conditions. 2. The property line on the north side of the proposed development should be clearly marked by the applicant to avoid intrusions into the adjacent "greenbelt" during times of construction. JPH/mp:c:FSU904.FP V N '3'S '3Ad '479 1 I W w w z 0 -.2LL9ZC 3.BS. .00 N I .OZ'091 3.85.65.00 N I LL + y D LLI — O O W 3 lJ n N O m N w N L,w N N .fZ OZI 3.95.65.00 N _ W r- I-- N Ic O O< LLJ T LLJ ill_ N N O I o w � O ., w m h .9z'oz1 C\ 3.95.65.00 N rif in W w n r Z W w L" I W '" ;'; m o I U r o m _I o 00 W In Z O w W int O WIC Y =-. f- W co �r �r F -In l�'ulz � .00'OZI OLLWZ I G x a 3.95.65.00 N Z r- l,: l l l l 1. W Q\ Z Z o O o N O M �. W Q �WNI o V m U) N W Z K zN .IP oz1 0 PC P91 M.9P. e5.00 S ,H.04. &Z .00 N Y f T J Ll cn .L 7? }• LIJ Z tL F. LLI J U 11� G Q L O N rtu Q O _ O O I mIQ lug m n m V •... G lr I Z I'- Llit7+ wIi l- .I I'OZI U O z z d_ w z « ❑.C2, CP .2C R.OZ. Cz.00 N O V O V r N rD o r LL OU j W W L � (fl N _ N v I1. (� LP I n l0 ! N m L � n j m iY 111 3.CP.Pf. f - U Q I. rn CC .PO'6Z1 O W �, i � 3.1 P.90 .00 N LL N LL � N' y o W Y � 87 "r O m' U� ly 'e99 Q H .G vn .PO. 11 ,Sj N N i s J N 0. 41'C �� o af h U 1\ vGo � m Q 00'011 � .ZOZII .00'[01 .2,0-EZC 3.CC.6S.00 N CC) r I (9Z Fd 'nGI h',�) b`JN1H�rld December 4, 1990 ZONING CODE 3G) ,j�'BER DOWELL) group_Homes_ :.:`.c.. ration to set the first meeting in :7an���;i:y 9�1 for a' public hearing to consider ac`i-cn ta•en on October 2,,�{990, by the Co!:nci1 an,clar_f.c the groupings .df what would specifically h, C-r:oap I, Group II- and Group III. Uoon Dowell's c-,:esti.on, City,,Attorney Lubovich not d that the Council has already approved the three categories of group. -homes, but that Group III had been sent to the Planning Committee for review. He said that the Legal Department has done some research on this matter and is working on modifications to Groups II and III. He stated that all three groups would be discussed at the hearing. WOODS MOVED to schedule this item for the first Council meeting in January. Johnson seconded and the motion carried. NOISE CONTROL (CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM 3E) Noise Control Ordinance. ADOPTION of Ordinance 2954 amending Ordinance 2113 and repealing Ordi- nance 2673, relating to controlling noise and providing for penalties for violations, as recorr mended by the Public Safety Committee. PRELIMINARY PLAT (OTHER BUSINESS ITEM 4A) Cedar Meadows No. SU -90-4. This meeting will consider the Hearing Examiner's recommendation of conditional approval of an application by J & G Industry for a 15 -lot single family resi- dential preliminary subdivision. The property is located on the west side of 116th Avenue S.E., approximately 100 feet north of S. 229th Street. There were no comments from the Council or the audience and JOHNSON MOVED to accept the findings of the Hearing Examiner, to adopt the Hearing Examiner's recommendation of approval with twelve (12) conditions of the Cedar Meadows No. SU -90-4 15 -lot single family residential preliminary sub- division. Woods seconded and the motion carried. Steve Chatman of 11410 S.E. 229th, stated that he didn't understand the conditions and Kevin O'Neill of the Planning Department was called upon to explain. A motion was then passed to reconsider Johnson's motion to approve the Examiner's recommendation. O'Neill and Chatman adjourned to the lobby and when they returned tE, minutes later, Johnson's motion to approve the -- Hearing Examiner's recommendation with twelve conditions carried unanimously. 3 - - 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Kent City Council Meeting Date February 1 1994 Category Other Business SUBJECT: RAMSTEAD/EAST HILL ANNEXATION �q+'T SUMMARY STATEMENT:On July 20, 1993, the City received a 60% petition for the annexation., Council authorized the circulation of the petition in October of 1991. The signa- tures on the petition have been verified and a Determination of Non -Significance per the SEPA process h}}s been issued. The annexation encompasses approximately 2�4"acres within the southeasterly corner of the City. It has an assessed value of $68,928,209 and an estimated population of 1540fe°Ple'/ I staff �al 1 c unc 1 tion L be t f'le he N tin b eBon ryBgi e a bri oveof same. accep peti and t do me t for evi w a �e P bl Work Di e annexatib should 1 ppr EXHIBITS: Public Works Director memorandum, vicinity map, SEPA Packet - available for perusal in Councilm ber office RECOMMENDED BY: Council Actior (Committee, Staff, Examiner, FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Rec 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: SOURCE OF FUNDS: Sion, etc.) PACT: NO ✓ YES nded Not Recommended 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember O, Vt) movejr ec�urrci-jjiiem er D'D seconds to accept the 60% annexation petition and direct the Public Works staff to file the Notice of Intent document for review and approval by the Boundary Review Board. ,JoodT Secor"de.d ct,, & y +^ 9 - DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 4E DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS JANUARY 272 1994 TO: MAYOR & CITY COU CIL FROM: DON WICKSTROM RE: EAST HILL ANNEXATION (AKA RAMSTEAD ANNEXATION) In October 1991 Council authorized the circulation of the 60% petition for the above referenced annexation. On July 20, 1993 the City verified the signatures on the petition and gave it to the City Clerk for acceptance. The signed petition reflects a little over 60% by signatures. However, it should be noted that signed annexation covenants within the area which were not used, total 85.9% of the assessed value. As denoted on the attached maps, the annexation is located in the southeasterly corner of the City and encompasses approximately 594 acres which is equivalent to approximately 1 square mile. It is within the City's annexation boundaries as established by Council and is within the County's urban growth area proposed for the City. It has an assessed value of $68,928,209 and an estimated population of 1,540. It is zoned predominately single family residential under the County's Land Use Plan and is anticipated to remain similarly zoned, once annexed based on the City's East Hill Comprehensive Land Use Plan. It is presently serviced by City sewer and water and the drainage therefrom predominately flows into Mill Creek. Fire service is provided by Fire District #37. The estimated fiscal impact is a deficit $42,994 per year based on an estimated expense of $441,164 and an estimated revenue of $398,170. (A more detailed breakdown is attached). The fiscal impact to the residences as shown in the attached Table is a $13.21 savings. An in-depth analysis of the annexation is given in the SEPA document, for which a copy thereof has been placed in the Councilmembers office for their perusal. Council action at this juncture, would be to accept the petition and direct staff to submit the Notice of Intent documents to the Boundary Review Board for their review and approval. Following Boundary Review Board approval, final action by Council and Mayor would be adoption of the annexation ordinance for which a public hearing is required. The time estimate from the action tonight to the eventual inclusion of the area within the City limits is four months, assuming Boundary Review Board doesn't invoke jurisdiction. Table 1 Estimated Annual Fiscal Impact . For Proposed East Hill Annexation PAGE 31 See following pages for notes (1) through (11). Existing Proposed East Hill Annexation Area City Total Total acres 11,881 594 Total rL nber of parcels 8,400 639 Total nnber of res. units 6,066 U Total estimated population 40,300 P 1,540 Total assessed valuation 3,938,682,179 A 68,928,209 Criminal CITYWIDE General CIP Street Justice Utility other - Furls Fund Total BUDGET Fund Fund Fund Fund Revenue: __ -------------------------- -----I--------- ----------- 210,448 Prop. Tax a 3.053150(1) 12 067,042 A 21o,448 25,500 Sales Tax(2) 11,040,186 25,500 29,317 Utility Tax(3) 4,004,743 0 29,317 Special Assessments 2,910,606 6,793 6,793 Real Estate Excise 388,146 A Gambling Taxes 515,338 2,912 Business Licenses and Permits(4) 650,679 OI 2,912 13,890 Grants 363,495 P 2,545 488 P 13,890 43,850 50,387 3,035 97,272 State Shared Reverie � 20,517 20,517 Local Sates Tax Criminal Justice 536,900 P 1,184 1,184 Fire insurance Premium Tax 67,650 AI 1 1,655 Drug Task Force Revenue 43 301 P , ,655 (79,697) Fire Protection District # 37(5) 2,536,839 0 (79,697) Jail Intergovernmental Revenue 777,528 10,583 King County Medical service Levy 604,719 Al 10,583 23,286 Fines and Forfeitures 609,359 Pli 23,286 Parks 1.643'348 1 12,899 Miscellaneous Fees(6) 531,697 01 12,899 Interest Incase 21998,493 (26,544) 26 544) ( , Water Utility(7) 6,565,562 01 Sewer Utility 8,387,326 33,586 33,586 Drainage Utility(8) 4,458,297 U 14,569 14,569 Street Utility @1.90/M 1,320,000 U Golf 2,869,428 Estimated Total Reverue 68,436,170 292,988 6,793 64,956 25,207 7,042 1,184 398,170 Expenditures: 53,217 General Governrent(9) 3,698,710 C 53,217 25,207 82,724 Potice(10) 10,120,436 0 57,517 Fire 9,966,712 130,571 Public Works-Street(11) 7,432,077 0 45,011 85,560 Leisure services 5,465,039 76,110 Health and Human Services 1,991,716 P 76,110 Debt Service 7,476,364 Water Utility 4,559,776 sewer Utility 8,542,924 33,586 33,586 Drainage Utitity(8) 1.488,771 U 64,956 64,956 Street Utitity(sperd chat cares 239,823 Golf 2,675,687 Estimated Total Expenditures 63,658,035 231,855 85,560 64,956 25,207 33,586 0 441,164 61,133 (78,767) 0 0 (26,544) 1,184 (42,994) Net Impact Inane (Loss) See following pages for notes (1) through (11). 'TY OF KENT --;ES TO RAMSTEAD ANNEXATION FOR THE YEAR 1993 (1) PROPERTY TAXES: City Regular Levy 2.56007 X 68,928,209 Assessed Valuation Excess Levy 0.49308 ------------ = 210,448 General Fund revenue -------------- 1000 3.05315 (2) SALES TAX: No business in area paying sales tax, dust sale tax on new here materials. Estmated FW of hares built 150,000 Estimated rLrber built per year 20 Total value per year 3,000,000 Local sales tax returned to City .0085 Amount to City per year 25,500 (3) UTILITY TAXES: Estimated Average Yearly Residential Utility Bill; Electrical/Natural Gas 924 Telephone 186 -------------- Subtotal 1,110 X Garbage 108 X -------------- Total For Year 1,218 (4) BUSINESS LICENSE: Rate 3.50% 38.86 6.50% 7.02 45.88 X 639 Res. Units= 29,317 Estimated Population 1,540 X 2786 Total Licenses = 106.46 Additional Licenses Total Population 40,300 X25.00 Business in Hare License 2,662 250 Business in existence 2,912 (5) FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT #37: Assessed Valuation 68,928,209 -------------- = 68,928 X 1.28471 County Rate = 88,552 1000 X .90 .City Portion 79,697 Loss to City (6) MISCELLANEOUS FEES: Planning, Engineering miscellaneous fees 358,200 General Goverrment miscellaneous fees 173,497 ------------ 531,697 PAGE 32 Assessed Valuation City Assessed Valuation Estimated Population General Goverrment Total Population PAGE 33 68,928,209 --------------X 358,200 = 6,269 Planning, Engineerirg miscellaneous fees 3,938,682,179 1,540 --------------X 173,497 = 6,630 40,300 ------ 12,899 General Goverrment misceLleel25 fees Total miscelleous fees (7) WATER UTILITY: ted to lose Water rates are 21.98 percent cheaper in the City limits, therefore the Water Utility is expec reverue upon annexation. Average water bill per year 189.00 Reduction percentage X 21.98'/. Loss per unit 41.54 X 639 = 26,544 Total Loss (8) DRAINAGE UTILITY: Drainage Basin "G" monthly charge 4.38 X 12 months = 52.56 X 639 developed parcels = 33,586 Drainage Revenue All income to Fund is expected to be expended in the same year. ----'- (9) GENERAL GOVERNMENT: General Goverrment expenses not expected to be as much using a ratio of annexation estimated population to the city total population, times the General Expenses. This is because some services are not expected to be needed. General Goverrtrent 3,698,710 Police 10,120,436 Public Works -Street 7,432,077 Health and Hunan services 1,991,716 Drainage Utility 1,488,771 Modified Expenditures 24,772,010 Modified Expenditures 24,772,010 -------= 37.65% Modification Ratio X 1,540 Ramstead Est. Pop. 65 787,025 --------- X 3,698,710 = 53,217 Total City Expenses 40,300 City Pop. (10) Preliminary estimate of $48,034 was based on a city average of cost per person and a Lower rrurber of units. The City of Kent average cost for police protection is increased greatly because of its large ird strial base and it costs more to process a call from a industrial taxpayer than a call from a residential taxpayer. Since Ramstead annexation is primarily residential an optional method is warranted. Arcual cost of service: a. 344 Single Family Hares X 126.54 Per Dwelling = 43,530 b. 295 Multi Family X 132.86 Per, Dwelling = 39,194 82,724 (11) Based upon Public Works field inspection there would be a $65,560 intial cost. Field inspection also indicates that the area would need sore additional work in approximately 5 years at a cost of 5100,000 with $20,000 reserved each year to cover these costs and a estimated $45,011 arrval maintenance cost. TABLE 2 PAGE 34 Approximate Tax Comparison for Annexation 1993 Levy Rates Prooerty Taxes: State County Co. Road District City Regular Levy City Voted Excess Levy G O Bonds Fie District #37 Library Hospital Kent School District #415 Port of Seattle EMS Flood Total Property Taxes Iroperty Tax Example: For $100,000 Home Total Avg Utility $1591.08 Due to Annexation: Reduction in Water Rates Drainage Utility Charge Surface Water Management Fee Street Utility Total Due to Annexation City Yearly Avg Utility Taxes: Billing Electricity/Natural Gas $924.00 Phone 186.36 Water 115.32 Sewer 230.40 Drainage 27.00 Garbage 108.00 Total Avg Utility $1591.08 Due to Annexation: Reduction in Water Rates Drainage Utility Charge Surface Water Management Fee Street Utility Total Due to Annexation City County $1,442.34 Total Total Difference 3.301 3.301 0 2.14039 2.14039 0 0.035 1.47678 (1.47678) 2.56714 0.035 2.56714 0.49537 6.52 0.49537 1.18441 (1.18441) 0.56134 (0.56134) 0.16238 0.16238 0 5.00877 5.00877 0 0.30518 0.30518 0 0.23942 0.23942 0 0.04373 0.04373 0 14.26338 14.4234 (0.16002) Total Property Tax, Utility Tax & Other $1,516.13 $1529.34 $(13.21) $1,426.34 $1,442.34 $(16.00) City Tax City County Rate Total Total Difference 0.035 $32.34 0 $32.34 0.035 6.52 0 6.52 0 0 0 0.065 7.02 0 7.02 $45.88 0 $45.88 City County Total Total Difference (32.89) (32.89) 54.00 54.00 87.00 (87.00) 22.80 22.80 43.91 87.00 (43.09) Total Property Tax, Utility Tax & Other $1,516.13 $1529.34 $(13.21) NOTES PROPERTY LINES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE PROPOSED ANNEXATION SHOWN AS SHADED AREA CONTOUR INTERVAL= 25 FT. rya 6 rmmmrtmmmrmmrmmlr KENT CITY LIMITS _i✓JJ uJ ��� a �. , _ GQl� � ©I r f V_I ��✓ /i 11 1 �7ff y J f_ � ;.Fn r/ b �HFEGcaW �0;� 4i4 lZ� � ��a �a�i8'.r�- x �}�� �.�� s5�1 ez �b�r�i1✓ix k'�„`o y �� it �S268TH -ST-.. '7 ' fr G 1 T O . x `✓ a� a_- '� tJ "41 ° p'� rc �F:.. 276TH $T .-. Y1" _..L... .. " f• (TI'i i � '. a _i i <. r � _ _ jJ \1 nl :Q tp Q S 277TH PL" ` V) I Ld p —p— — - T --- - I`.. --+- �E 281ST ST — - co E- 49 SE 284 H ) na -- Vic64THSTi PROPOSED EAST HILL ANNEXATION EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY IV Fo A `r ` i iJi 0 262ND` CITY' r�i � to :. .� ...i .—_._ T-. •.! L rya 6 rmmmrtmmmrmmrmmlr KENT CITY LIMITS _i✓JJ uJ ��� a �. , _ GQl� � ©I r f V_I ��✓ /i 11 1 �7ff y J f_ � ;.Fn r/ b �HFEGcaW �0;� 4i4 lZ� � ��a �a�i8'.r�- x �}�� �.�� s5�1 ez �b�r�i1✓ix k'�„`o y �� it �S268TH -ST-.. '7 ' fr G 1 T O . x `✓ a� a_- '� tJ "41 ° p'� rc �F:.. 276TH $T .-. Y1" _..L... .. " f• (TI'i i � '. a _i i <. r � _ _ jJ \1 nl :Q tp Q S 277TH PL" ` V) I Ld p —p— — - T --- - I`.. --+- �E 281ST ST — - co E- 49 SE 284 H ) na -- Vic64THSTi PROPOSED EAST HILL ANNEXATION EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY IV 1 r�i rya 6 rmmmrtmmmrmmrmmlr KENT CITY LIMITS _i✓JJ uJ ��� a �. , _ GQl� � ©I r f V_I ��✓ /i 11 1 �7ff y J f_ � ;.Fn r/ b �HFEGcaW �0;� 4i4 lZ� � ��a �a�i8'.r�- x �}�� �.�� s5�1 ez �b�r�i1✓ix k'�„`o y �� it �S268TH -ST-.. '7 ' fr G 1 T O . x `✓ a� a_- '� tJ "41 ° p'� rc �F:.. 276TH $T .-. Y1" _..L... .. " f• (TI'i i � '. a _i i <. r � _ _ jJ \1 nl :Q tp Q S 277TH PL" ` V) I Ld p —p— — - T --- - I`.. --+- �E 281ST ST — - co E- 49 SE 284 H ) na -- Vic64THSTi PROPOSED EAST HILL ANNEXATION EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY Kent City Council Meeting Date February 1 1994 Category Other Business 1. SUBJECT: DRINKING DRIVER TASK FORCE - ENDORSEMENT OF LEGISLATIVE PACKAGE 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: In a letter dated December 20, 1993 to Councilmember Woods, the Drinking Driver Task Force Steering Committee requested .the C' ouncil bw adopt a 1994 Ihilud�.w �' ,itawar� items set ,, +t� legislative package kettErj- for consideration by the State Legislature: i -5f 1 iv f v'A�6 3. EXHIBITS: Letter 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Councilmember Houser (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended 91� 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ N/A SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember MCL—moved, Cvar►c' er secon to adopt a 1994 Legislative package for consideration by the State Legislature to include those items set forth in the December 20, 1993 Drinking Driver Task Force letter to tr\ onded Council--�.•Presiaea�• U es n, u� e p 10-4 n e d 41� Tc DISCUSS9ON: C� U �ATCTION:�o"'1(.�' Council Agenda Item No. 4F December 20, 1993 Council President Judy Woods Kent City Council 220 Fourth South Kent, WA 98032 Dear Dr. Woods, At the December 10, 1993 meeting of the Kent Drinking Driver Task Force Steering Committee, the membership voted to support several issues anticipated to come before the State Legislature in 1994. As our volunteers would like to identify themselves as Kent Task Force members when speaking with legislators regarding these issues, they are requesting that the City Council adopt a 1994 legislative package and encourage inclusion of the following items: 1) amend safety restraint laws to allow primary enforcement; 2) prohibit people from riding in open cargo beds of trucks; 3) require child restraint devices through age 4; 4) support a 90 day administrative license suspension for any driver under age 21 at zero blood alcohol tolerance; 5) tightener the eligibility requirements and supervision over deferred prosecution; 6) re -authorizes the Omnibus Drug Bill; 7) prohibit possession of hand gun for anyone under age of 21, with specified exceptions; 8) amend constitution to allow DWI checkpoints; 9) revamp the juvenile court system; 10) require mandatory server training through WLCB or private sector classes, not a video course. The Task Force recognizes that specific bills are not yet available for your review, and request your policy guidance to allow Task Force members to support these highway safety issues. Thank you for your assistance with this request. Sincerely, Christi Houser, Councilmember Chair, Kent Drinking Driver Task Force stcl1293 CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS A. R E P O R T S A. COUNCIL PRESIDENT B. OPERATIONS C. PUBLIC WORKS COMMI D. PLANNING E. PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE F. PARKS H. ADMINISTRATIVE El d O O Q O O O 9 ntoa, G y b.o ,,�, OCi ro two. i4 � �^, � < Q N �" n• G. O �. �o� � 9 cn 0 9 •d •o m w n � d �T?a0�n�o o�� w ro ^ ro m �^ v rb y C < ° o n .-• '�' m a. b rD 00 :apo r R. w 5o aro En 0v�5rn o CD . ❑ N n n w o fD rL p n R m �' p' u• x a.O�o' n a b rb P. R 7c' �' G �, d Nry 5 0 P• y o.n, 09. y x 5 5 5 5 W n 2.9 a. 2• O OO m y" n OQ rc y rb w ^ N G m A V w n 'Li tD a oa8 b C G n i oa��03 9 vrobS$mofDtooSnpo m a 5 r°�o � o a v :° n H d o a D) o O(b v o o T o �3 m w N b a 0 � � � o � m jJ m n � a• w a b w n 0 0 o W d n z n w G ra o (D R n D Z o o bo ao OQ a$ °� a° o 0 r0.- a o "o t ixa b K •ab 3 o rrD o w" F7 5 GC qaq oq p O n''° a ^ryp rD m F'n :3 oq a-'° b R p t� ^ `� O °' N C: N a om N i N 5 0°� 5 n rri p 7 O D, om W rC ro O CL G 9. 7 °o~ Ia. 5 a nG TR 5 a8 "• C n m G G. o a m R° 5 m y C Gc rsn n W o nn naa.ng,n n5 na.�C ;o�a.o < °'a S G� °G bn+ p ° 7 0 �i p 9 G �v 7 d. o `•� x' C7 N (D NN° °; 'u CD }7. n n M0 ..p.� O .CO-. b7 O O n � rD rD 0 m N b7 \ 5 G Qnn'o� 2 grD Oro O b n m o] O5, °�..,, S o o Fc K° by orD55 oni OO qq m ° oq R p El N _._ ......._=_ -.. 0 0 0 0 0y� o 0 0 0 O w 70 < R aa—ira'w n- j n to p G� oFm o a o o:5 .O rn n 0cn 0 G,O ° 0.poa.r 5 am o•5. 0 0-Af f ti �n 0.m n d n.: w • o Z o O rb n �: rD ..3 j 0 0 p.O (7b P X }'n ^p ° O 5 C c a to 0 ° m° n 0 o 0 w a m � S.R m nty- a b 0 f° a^ o d^° m �° n' " �D �° a y \ �' .<O-.�n—'° a O .pI thy• wO (a9 "o ny, wy M 5 0 a 0 � 7y o \ w w < rbw � Q- m � � rD ° m R C, N rho w O' �. ' O C7 G OG 9 Gam',. x•��., iii � -01 O ° ➢+ (<L O 0 00 •g P. p• O7 m O CA Q " "q �p O ] O x 9 a� ("D _- o Cpl, 2 9 cr Ow x m 5�n 'R \rD K p' E-.3 0.O„ ry O w 0 0, oq AAi w W R oo y n ° ma c \ C, \ o w v � n n° c A V w [� W FL e m rL � R ° � °a 0 o Ina, -; 04 n n v w L. 2, d 'z n Gw 0• ' 'd g n n 0 (b O n tc Nn° rn• 0 H 7" O O a� v cn 10 n tiC.v n O a n r0°^o ~o g 5.� p 0 ° ID R� 0 o b m c° ai m o :° �• !opp f9 tj CL � � � �. (b� o° 0 - °0 n w n r'� A � or O n � W 320 ch 0 fD ° g O y�.c gwrx m CL V) , 4 �." O OQ Hwyn RO rn 7 00 -0w aa.g Cn O ":j 0 cr G Vn-4p.nt7o 0P.m m x( y O �? n°� a a •roo an d n p M y x° q <u a y to ° Q. O m r^p 0 IV rb W no �. 0 0 o> O m o 0 0 y ro c' .zj ? rn o o FD txn "L7 [�7 cn y� n6; o ""Y�x rn tn d o ��g o 7y5 M n rn � � n o � fD m w O � K, O r- 0 O 0. «�•'77x 5'O j to g no 3 roOo to (Q n9 � No ro rD [u zx OQ hw°� ^°7pLn too_oc.n5 \ ov 2 O n3 x p R 0 0 w m r 0 p 2: 0 g o ,,, n p Fj 0 rO �TC7 Ng. tj d0�0•� W vRi C b x G r7 �• ti � � y n `� p CL c ° o p00 D 9 H H n IM, o. 0 rD \ ` 'WD 0 d M r rotoy �.C7n n g o Z 5 0 o cn w a O G 5ti 110 o n ti r0 a n m 0 p t� n rb o a rD 2 ti (D P� O O, w o <Kj o 0 o ., r0 w OT Oq ,n7. K 7 D O rGn „ C7 ren i+ h b n ..n w OGGF O N V i F 112 - A > vpv w wo� 00000 40 c� �, .-a b A � M w R � `° �' o > x fD rn rn� �fnpt/�'q�� m0 'V r W\ fryp R N fD N to rov°p rD r w 0 w re zr�n OQ p rD °www o"o .\o ? � r (D CO 9 �w° rpcry0.p �w ryx A rl 0y oar. on�y" C bowo , :3 0 mS o'd p.p r7o'o o'o cw�w R P`fO . i G• �°��„� c �(D ems o m MR � 6 � 7 w �^ _ < .e Qn Ia. E o �°O < gyp 5 ,a:): d o O c w cf cn OQ a 6 ° fD w Q^ gyp \ m p, rrb O" w O K' 00 d O y o rvAn w" O 5 0. mrn n cn g w0. v.::r 0 aC 95 � nm �°�° 0 9 O .r G Q `^ O 00 5. 00 wO' N 5. A fD " r) ti n " a..' i �' n _ d P• 'b p^ O Op ^ y p. r �O„ wx 5' r y < < �n rri W \ �i. < R rn °7. R O G. 0, W G cn O� n 0 oo rx o K b o 04 21 gco o w H C 7 rp CL n n p CnC . p y I O � N < r^O, (D a (xD a to 7 m rxD w o w7 m tc o o w y m y A. M °5. (5o IM. m w" w yoy N R 7 m n ,,, ~ p' r- t'y 0. p m 0. 5 O O O ; p• 5" 7 a a < rNI m (D <owo ° o =w (� y 0 Ul 0o07<£�Rto 5"2< R- t'.) i ,o7OiID n d 5 coo R� W rD p O 7 y m rD N" 00 '-r. O tD 05 �.D �5.r�w` w�o]a `�°`°rr° �°m�rn d w� 0 10 o p t D < D Z .y m m o 5 H w r r. 'r O w w G 7' �' w 'O ^ o (D w '� w 'A �n 7' t7 w r) (o Ei W O (D DQ O (D n `< a Cb Cr 5+ n rn O G .". H i m_n x o(D w o 0 0 00 D o °n ° x e o ° m m �w A H �fnpt/�'q�� m0 'V r W\ fryp R N fD N to rov°p rD r w 0 .�oq n m :!I o P• w A. W p 5 Q dti '.< a. R . .\o ? � r Un o 0 0 ° m p 0 0 0 0 0 ni 0 0 0 o Z nt7t7° nY p O oy C7 rD nnyn nn���ty ° z 'o a ° a. t7 y Ln oHCl, "•~�.�^ c oq fig z o' = V) q* o-- o n� Go b p d 2 a Z n: �" p b 0 En CL oc0. a a c 5 0 5 0 < ^ rD Ra a a woq 9 d (rypp t)v �Aa. bf£.D, . T hryryA• , .r�, _O+ 'to -(Kpi C<p. `0.G gy,Np p, � aC.�GO[� �nC°' 0,°�n. (0.rpoi , .DrGo' '�ro er rD rb m �°, rb dp0OCF:3-d n1 % .0 ,W°on, gC 2.�a o g. giaG�Gnxd00�vp, A• d + g. O .0 aoN 1114 Xo o° aaA xf*a0�^Nul ~. MC,d 5105dn � . w 't°ivv�1i n �n m G. tib 3 �. �- 77 G. r`p 5' �. C. � O ° n ryp o < O OW G O G rD ° O O O. (D G 7 P. 7 a S d d (D ^ O R m R 5: ::3 �° n c. $ 5 a OM N 19 . x a b 0 . m d° Oy a: w O R x d Hm`a a. fD�. a. d 5-`�• ,SD�rB C a. m' a o v 0 n �.. a 0 D rD o ti 9 d 0.a S O .O m rD b n n ,^, W a v oc D n N a s ? D oro "D n R twj 90 m ° S� �" a a m ad m 5. DD ° a' W y mr�^D 2.G o DGwoti �� N5 °RD W a o' W o g w o rD < g ?c^. 0 CD 8 x c y a y .I m a rn ref ;0 w cx .'� rD d #- d g� o p0., n X n txD °y ry n c ., n •, c G 7' Q rD O , :• , P m N 1 p o°+ n P. p a �• ,� a d d Da 0.w 0, ^ LnrD ^ th N ^p rD z n O y d V1 O rD in- rD 'a a rD N OR F'' x \p v' y G rn` R° ate$ a� C: '-V' n N d N N '� d oG0 CD3 -73 0 LO 0 o (D 5" tx ° °5° ° d O fD � �' o o y a n O ra• d 0 n tX r"D oo : < O O OQ' o• d w ;; a fD �0 D n H+ Jq 7 G. 30 la r-+ m oo:-o_ -o n x ° o 0 0 ° ° �,ov do �rv9 oovxx n o 005 x x :z dam _0o cc <oct?5• 5 x m m m Ky, m< o 0o G' Lo o Fn G1 to rfl n 3 000 °5<°n °oe o °ovo x 7bam E c n 2 tj g• r, o b n o n cfo P. z N y� [j MW p' n A. Fri R 3 Cz ^3 O 7 y� N ITicn❑ 7 5 0 n fD d 7 Fn 7 to o w rZ r3 w o z r ro n o p 5' w am < A.�_n0 o a a m ro n a m r, ,. A. 0 0< m m l< m 'U ro fl ry n b o m 0 N G G � a. o O tt O o 7 ?. p O W 7 ��r EJr°o 70 5< m O rD w 7 ^3N 'owo nop �' S fa 7 \R «� 7 n �^ fn R. O n w o ^r 00 w a ° m ° ^ o .°� v� c� Z w t� ov ro oq 'zi LO N ooq ft \ Q 00 w' m O m O tb \ n G w m dN, a 'U n n, tp 5-0 �'�• ogID � 5 m � o o 9 ti M M �? m rn• 0 2 a 5' x ryp i w 5' S' m R. m tp b R, orqD O lT1 7, - a d m GQQ. m CL V) d .d �' n P. w O` on n 7 n y^ G� G. m rJ m m fmCD <o w E. ,p oa ., .. F �- rn o _ �D .. OQ '05t�7 O W O CL. Im p? y O� m o p O w y ob9.noN ° m R. o o \ r �Eo fl 5 0000�° a A- \ w m C C 7.+ qq n o O 7'O n ° �O <m k^ C n w ti d x 0 m g � m � ° G w° � � °9 � 0 p�ya airy oow.Fv°^5'b `m a00C b oo - $. -7 - �. ° �. " rn �. m n '•' ,`ten' N O E P. P' O O" a O^ o om^ v 5 7° a° o0"Q fr ° w. E3 m o w o 5' <• m °�° n o° g x O a ' 5 w 0 °a o' F 0 $ oga2<b R.5 va°r.oF�o d 70oo.ow5 057 0 m5'oa3 0 -a c ny n oo 5 n. ov �n OA 11 M o o o w w v ? o w \ 0 w .- ,7 OC R. v o 5 m O w 0 0 0 �. O �✓' V C) 0 CSr,o 0 0 0 x prD ocNIVI NaOQ a z f0 161 oo monv �o o L° c o ° a 0 �• a� 5 d� 9 �'� ov c.°p o^ `2.00°ryp(a �� Koa o fnD 0. '�1., b ° oNp �•t p 7 C 0.+ oQ C•: a. iJ o N G OdG �' a �' PS ,5^ 7 O ,C co W S, '��Cyy m CRt. y 0 'O 0 (� ° v� C n �S. qo rx.0 o o'.. o n c• n d O d .� O N U �no$�o1 5R��y occn�ti 99'°ao5 arc < p < O oc ° po m° A d py c n o m as n a' c N �o7 i» � n rD °nnn 5 p ] NS a 5 m o] o ro w v I �. tb C N 0 yo a. _n O K' G n 9 f'dryp' S p' W ,< x p y N o p U` W C y ro O ti 0. OQCj "'� p d O° n 'b o O d 7 y C n 0. p \p ° m ° 05 n o o c�. `000 h(D m d5 w on n nA.� oa 7. o o o �n p S 5 P G p •I n fb DQ n q� T m O E c m b ° 0 a o N E y �• � G• 0.0 ^ \ �' Fn �n n � a. �•�5 5. o� m o N � 0rb n O fD \ 0 N abron �oy p, n D5 0 o m .n°v 0 as oan c 5'p• -E, m m � �° fR as 0a'v nw o ^ d Z d 5 p°0 m � n•o ° a C ,p 5• rrpp• ] m . n �• .ro m n c -., B [D. C, oQ M C. n rD �V77 �-7 5 C1. '� o t� d O N a ^� �+. ry0 d 5- •• f4 N rnD 0. c. 7' fD o .C. 0. d W cr 19 g. 0. n b d^ O K n 7 : Op f? C '2 •sf ' W ]rD n R' 7n G. r E'en on o a.0 On d0 ax aP aad o c. P. ° a5 IN ct o. o m S « C� m n 5 0.] v°moo'� �df�.� coo o�w<u9g (� • on5x_ �' ° ;� rn a 'r n�'tj d opv n 9in. • o O o.r0 a M 0 °n n O no A, y w c x o n9 fD° ot" IJ, ID 0- a n �b O p• rr R C7 b y O O m m m u D r % p W y C. y oq 0 0 7 W y H d a rD ., p• W p, M m ro R Q iA�• d ''? m O G (DD R F X n �. r1D MD o<i W rA � ryL. d N N ( M d mO nO � 7 . ,.., 0. N p' N rro (D q5 y R 7 ^p O& W ]- a G. O OQ CD 0'.0 G o o rt w 10°�° ° o'er a. -0 o W h a o D) ro 0 O X n O ' 9 n m o a > m b a D b m b w y rt w]] m � p• �` p � r�D � rD O LO ii, G W SD _..-. 'O n �b 99 O a W ro R Q ¢ w goo 0 0 0 0 17UC7tn� SCJ` b7 P-G� � a n 7'.ztna..'C' bN ] o D z � r 0 rD 9 OQ ' pp 0 q OOv' =i o' oG ro,Gh1%f CFn b < w rS O 0Fn �• I9 O n fD p O0 O ° ID O. W fD n• v m� 0. mZ \ "O'er Q 0 b L (g 0Q y p• \ mom OO m 5 w o m Fn p• P• i 8 vp � �n x o o K% u�1 o o o n '� p � w p p a. o rn o d cc i mp o pry- fL o o — 8 m O.. O O O N (.9. . O tD �wp 'lnm °0.Ln V 00 rn O O < Q' flF,3a .. \ww N CI - 0 't7 C^ ^ (D pO.nG co Op (Pp. ry cV'j' 'a O O 7 CL H~ GorypO°� o=B o7L��>�� w A n O V o tj mac m o nn° m a° < (Dd a E ° o o Com, y o pA, n '^ w (D K. �. "m � , m RL -- a Q, o b C ryry m g n 0 M. C O �D ("F<+D y G a M p• w p• O Q may 'pO x< N n ,g• P• 9-,. n �: pq H § to 09 O �• n :' O pA• N O fD .. °� h 0.C„ .-., 00 ° C. Cl. R P• "� C O Oi 8 H CD m n tr m c m p. y a o ro . " o m w m n3. b$ e o o' °° m 6 a n m a c in, n� °� 5"° c o 'w .ate 0 0 ry QQm pprJQQO` CL p op O in. Jq � W \ Gto rba n O^p a E•� oA. r 000 0 P� o p w E� b 0.c m.§ B p y 5 p n 0 0 0 so cn 0o 2.0�to �v,� ca Sp o m c.no =x n CCn mss.?z �.` -0 �rxm 00 Nn C d rfc II. 77 to `� O a w CA Z 3 1 B^ r w v w m ° ° a �.. w F- ^ w 9 0 n oq a b 5 D b h fD ryrH R° gyp! iri a' �ii cn P, 0 ( j 0 N ra °, 5 a w • z N a o A. n w w � � a Nv�35'ya < o Ao �. rc ^ oa ¢ w (D w a 05 n b w a a. p o \o a n w w °'- ag• 0. Lo OQ w oo] S. \0 q d ne xb n� cC) nS.--3XQ cm y �b o w o w a� E.�� oy 8 w p w n O N O n n D p n m a C Ern ^ G .0 p 4 � G �O� a A. S n DD 7 ^ b w a' wu a' vp,' ^ w F -n w .w, ", ci rho t0.e 5 fD 'b nn_ w n n ,w-. 0. G �. ^ 0. a n O a. n O a nom, °.m YD:' 0,w pa's°o0q'° c`�° .o C'j \�fyy Pao O �n ro pNrFp- O pa (0.D cl °CC �' p y n c - K `� rGN�. N 0. CA d �' 7 ,°y o N fwal .°.n '-: w 0 cl ° r G. 17 0 O W \ H o �j .. C. P, ci .c roD o (R(p �Fy ,� � `� (D -n �7 � � g Q � � �j Q. W N .N. O a ry ^ M rD N G ° •-- o w a N O m m°° x� 5'0 ti n m ^ w y a o Z5 a a g co oart(D o�-m o- w° aa. ° r ' y V Q r. o n d �. g rD fb o w 0 a to " n w o m �° w 7°° c° d ^ o O �- P• 'n' O m O p (���` o �pp °° ary a° n fin° nr3�m .' o t0\ M- 0. `•y y I. w 0 Cs � f oa rp `O n rD o \ ro po E': CD �'�o a a w° m� til O O O<[ O O O' O O O 0 0 •C Z O t7r�rotn�5 y O a mfz c C.0 V < DC7 07 CL G• o -3 c::1 o pig ro ro y C ° ° x n oq d 0 n° ° 9 m _ � � n z - � z_ ti 5 ro z °� a 'v OSo. d d x �n 0 Ro�o.�n�od W° m � w -R ", i,� '° g °p o 5 o 0 tD t ° a m' in, n d 0 El tpD 0 •" b 7 n G m y \ C n m 'COC 0 r. ci A. p CDW 7y n R 4roy N° q �' �•I d vii ov o 8�' ro d C7 W A N CDo Ep ° CL 0 S. m gn. zf fD n ro pa(p a V, ro n N A° fD n � a n 'Q O 'y ° 9 N n r7ry n ry a 0. R N n yMn�,' n rt (p IIJ y °o tD Dryro R m a d�P 0" � ry n c^ rD O o -0 w 100 R. 0 �i, .� O y 0 0 K+0 �n d Qdry n0 N n N o xmvMv m o o g N� o r 5. H 9 o o o(0 5 m 5. m o n� m 5 o 0 . P. mp � 10 p�µp 0 `n".b .Ny „F'(. ID O •�•(� C7 n D y F G. d .�' w n p d R° O 0� (~D rDD 'O ,^ x in I d Gi 'd 'L3 d rD fw-+ ..� p a 8 x.a acm o o d m R 5� ter, 5 5 W ��o n n ud � a C7 0 oDO N. :° § Oo OQ �, F'D x- 0 ° Oo o N d wy n o D �x 0 \ o-boab a o d °• ro oq g. 0fb LO r0 + O I q CD D n a ° d o �e ' d �O 0 W O03 W pLLJ PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE JANUARY 5, 1994 PRESENT: PAUL MANN TONY McCARTHY JON JOHNSON MAY MILLER DON WICKSTROM STEVE CAPUTO TOM BRUBAKER NELS JOHNSON GARY GILL MR & MRS RUST ABSENT: JIM BENNETT Rabanco - Garbage Contract Rates Steve Caputo stated that in July of 1993, Rabanco requested a garbage rate increase due to cost of service. He said this was followed up with an August 24th letter showing numbers and reasons for the increase. Caputo said he had a discussion both with Don Wickstrom and Roger Lubovich and asked where the City stood on this. At that time, Wickstrom informed him that this was a Council decision. Rabanco said at that time that they did not want to go to audit but would rather work something out. Caputo said Rabanco had requested a 21% increase and he felt an audit would delay it another 30 days. Caputo said they needed this in July and now it is 3 - 4 months later. He said they were very comfortable at that time with 15% however since then, they have talked more within their company and they would like 18%; Caputo said they are now comfortable to go with an audit however, the increase will be greater than 18% and we will save lost time. Caputo said he feels the process has been stalled and they would like to move on this Mann asked why it would be more with an audit. Caputo said they asked for 21% and they feel the audit would support a 21% increase. Caputo said that 18% now is better than 21% four months from now. Caputo said they have comparative rates from sister cities in this area and from unincorporated King County. Caputo said that Kent's rates are well below everyone else. Wickstrom said that we looked at some data that Rabanco provided and there are two arguments in their proposed rate increase. He said one is related to their maintaining that the commercial accounts were subsidizing the residential rates and they can no longer do that since the territory has been divided. Wickstrom said the other argument was that because we have now gone to an incentive residential rate for garbage - the smaller the can the less the charge, more people have gone to a smaller can and have gone to recycling. He said that while they still have to provide 1 the same service, the numbers they have given us shows their revenues have actually decreased by 6% while their customer accounts have increased by 8%. Wickstrom said there is some relationship there. As far as the argument about subsidizing residential; the rates we used in the contract were the WUTC established rates. Wickstrom surmised that he thought WUTC would look at each individual customer class on a stand alone basis. As such, since our rates were WUTC established, he did not quite follow the hauler's logic. Wickstrom said that in making a comparison with other cities as far as their rate vs. ours, with most other cities doing recycling it appears that our rates are a little lower for garbage service. Wickstrom said that we have no basis to say it should be 21% or whatever, and the only way we could really do that is to go to an audit. e said under the contract, the hauler is required to payor Nels Johnson of Rabanco, said they did an internal audit in August with their own CPA staff and at that point, all the numbers they ran thru came up with a 21% increase and Rabanco is confident that an auditor would find the same thing. Wickstrom said there would be a cost of living increase, or CPI increase, in April under the contract. He said that in April he would assume Rabanco would go for the cost of living increase. Nels Johnson said the CPI increase does not amount to much of anything. Referring to the garbage contract, Brubaker said there are basically four instances justifying a rate increase. He explained that one is an increase in dump fee costs not associated with a change in the consumer price index; another area is called "unusual cost" such as changes in the law; a third area is the CPI area and the fourth area is a rate adjustment to reflect justified increases and operating expenses and that particular request is limited to once per year. Brubaker stated that in Rabanco's first letter to us, they based their request for a rate increase on this increase and operating expense; in their last letter to us, they said it more properly reflected a different item which was the "unusual cost" item, -such as a change in the law. Brubaker said he has conferred with the City Attorney and his feeling about this issue of the commercial -residential subsidy is, that was part of the negotiating quid pro quo in the contract when it was first entered into. In other words, Rabanco entered into the contract with knowledge that there were would be this averaging of the two Tri- Star and Rabanco rates on the commercial end and that it would have an impact. Brubaker said that since Rabanco knew this was going to happen when they willingly entered into the contract, he has trouble understanding how that could be a basis for an increase. Brubaker said that the recycling issue looks like a legitimate issue and he felt that in order to avoid Rabanco incurring the cost of doing an audit, perhaps they could provide us with more specific information for review. 2 Brubaker said that less than a year ago, we entered into a lengthy contract to lock in service until the year 2001 and now Rabanco is asking for a 21% increase in rates within one year. Brubaker recommended that by the next committee meeting we come back with some sort of compromise, solution and/or a recommendation to go to an audit. Caputo stated that they have used every avenue that the contract has given them and as it gets more and more delayed they would expect to be able to retroactive an increase. Committee recommended that staff review the rate increase issue and bring it back to committee. Segregation Request - LID 320 Wickstrom stated that this was a James Street LID and the segregation request was made by Schneider Homes, on the north side of James Street, west of West Valley Highway. Wickstrom requested approval of the segregation. Committee unanimously recommended approval of the segregation request. Sale of Surplus Vehicles Wickstrom referred to the list of vehicles that were submitted for surplus. Jack Spencer stated that we have 18 pieces of equipment and they all have high mileage or are in need of major repair. McCarthy said that we are getting a new Senior Center van in the 194 budget. He asked if the vans in the list are no longer useable. Spencer said that these were the vans that the Senior Center did have and he would like to keep the better of the two as a back-up. Committee unanimously recommended declaring this equipment as surplus and authorize the sale thereof at the next state auction, with the exception of one van to be used as back-up. Signal at Reiten & Jason Wickstrom said we received six bids and one was received thru FAX which turned out to be the low bid. He said there is $1000 difference between the low bid and the second bid; however because of some improprieties in the FAX bid, the second bidder would possibly sue us. He said that legally awarding the bid to the low bidder is defensible however, a great deal of staff time would be involved in a suit for a $1000 differential. Wickstrom said that the Public Works Dept. is recommending that the six bids be rejected, and the project be re -bid. Committee unanimously recommended rejection of all bids. 3 Mill Creek Canyon Erosion - Acceptance Wickstrom said this was a project Public Works Dept awarded because it was under the bid limits and we were under time constraints to get the erosion control in Mill Creek and we had only a short amount of time to work in the creek due to the fish existing there. Wickstrom said we awarded the contract; it has been completed and the original amount was $34,991.88. He said there were some overruns of the original estimated quantities for dirt and rock which brought the final contract up to $39,500. In response to Johnson, Wickstrom said the additional funds came from the Mill Creek project and there is no problem with the funding. Committee unanimously recommended project be accepted as complete. North 4th Ave Street Rebuild -..Acceptance Wickstrom said this was a project that we awarded to Segale to essentially rebuild the south half of N. 4th from 228th to Barnier's property which is half way to 212th St. He said the final contract amount was substantially less than the original amount. Committee unanimously recommended project be accepted as complete. 1993 Asphalt Overlays - Acceptance Wickstrom said this was an asphalt overlay contract to finish off an LID near the Garrison Creek Reservoir where we had an LID for sewer. He said because of winter weather, we had to close out the LID and reserve money to do the street restoration work until the following season. He said also that on Alvord we had another sewer LID; and because of the late time of year, we went back the next year and did the overlay. Wickstrom said the final amount was less than the original contract. Committee unanimously recommended project be accepted as complete. Reiten Road Landslide Repair - Acceptance Wickstrom said this was a project at Reiten Rd & Maclyn Street where the hillside was slipping away. He said the total amount was $25,050.00 and since the project was under $35,000, the Public Works Dept awarded it. He said there is another one to do further down the hill but this one is complete. Committee unanimously recommended project be accepted as complete - Family Homes Short Plat Bill of Sale Committee unanimously recommended bill of sale be accepted and bonds released after the one year maintenance period. 4 Stone Pine East Sewer Extension be Committee relea ed after the onerecommended maintenancesale accepted and perd. bonds Robinson Sewer Extension le be Committee after the one year maintenanced bill Of period. accepted and per od bonds Conservation Futures Grants Wickstrom stated that this is a contract where the City will get approximately $800,00 for three parcels, and one is $500,000 for the Lagoon acquisition. He said Parks has one near the newspaper office and one at the upper end of Mill Creek at 104th & 267th. He said the Parks Committee has already approved their two parcels and we wanted to make sure that when this agreement came before Council, that the $500,000 would be included which would eliminate coming back to Committee. Brubaker stated that he has reviewed the contract and recommended some changes in the Indemnification. Brubaker feels he will be successful in getting the County to look at it a little differently but right now the way the Indemnification is written, it is called an sole negligence standard" where basically unless County is re solely responsible for damages arising from this contract, we a to indemnify the County to pay for 100% of the damages. He said in other words, if there is a claim arising from this finds thatcountyagainst both the County and the City, and a j y 90% responsible for the damages and we are only 10% responsible, we still pay 10o%. Brubaker said only in those instances where the jury finds the County 100% responsible do they them to agreegree to pay o to the damages. Brubaker said he is trying to get straight forward comparative negligent standard. Committee unanimously recommended authorization for the Mayor to sthe agreement, ign on the changeni n the indemnificationdent on the City elanguage. with the Meeting adjourned at 6:30 P.M. 5 PUBLIC WORKS COMM MEE JANUARY 19, 1994 PRESENT: PAUL MAN MAY MILLER JIM BENNETT JACK BALL DON WICKSTROM ROBYN BARTELT TOM BRUBAKER MR & MRS RUST Recvcle - Reauest for Proposals Brubaker submitted a draft copy of the RFP to the Committee and stated that after reviewing the previous RFP and removing any ambiguities, he did add a new section of "Qualification" which asks for names and resumes of principle officers, partners and names of individuals who would actually be conducting the program. Brubaker said that the most important addition was related to whether a company has been involved in a litigation within the last five years. Brubaker asked for approval to proceed with advertising of the RFP on February 11th. He said it could be brought back to Committee for their recommendation at the February 15th Public Works meeting. He said the present extension ends at the end of March. Bennett stated that he had complete confidence in that everything that had been previously discussed, relative to the new RFP, has been included. Brubaker said if the Committee would like to make any additions or changes, they could do so prior to advertising. Committee unanimously agreed to the publication of the RFP on February 11th. Kent Springs Transmission Main Phase II - Accept as Complete Wickstrom said the original amount of this project was $1,799,993.56 and the final construction cost was $1,910,635. He explained that this was primarily related to some unanticipated work and downtime associated in securing some easements. Wickstrom said this was a good project, although Charlie Kiefer has called and said his yard is still not fixed and wanted to make sure that this was known to the Committee. Wickstrom said that Kiefer has filed a claim against the City and since that claim is filed by his attorney, we couldn't fix it even if we wanted to. Brubaker said there is a statute that says before a suit is filed with the City a claim form must be filed on the City's approved claim form. He said Kiefer did that; then he hired an attorney and filed another claim. Brubaker said we have done everything we can. Wickstrom said the Corps has concurred with the City and if we go in there now and try to change the wetland, we would be in violation with our permit with the Corps. Committee unanimously recommended that the project be accepted as complete. Lindental Meadows - Bill of Sale Committee unanimously recommended the bill of sale be accepted and the bond released after the one year maintenance period. R.V. Rest stop on Naden Avenue Bennett said he spoke with Wickstrom on this item and Wickstrom had advised that we needed to establish a budget, verify the validity of the budget, and come up with a design. Bennett said that Jack Ball gave him a design based on 8 stalls. Wickstrom said he wanted to downsize it because there is about 10,000 sq. ft. of paved surface. He said when it goes over 51000 sq. ft. there are water quality and detention requirements which will add substantially to the cost. Wickstrom said that we are looking at cutting it down to 5 stalls. Bennett stated that there is an R.V. jamboree coming up in September but if it gets cost prohibitive, there is enough paved area in the City to accommodate the R.V.'s rather than spending $25,000 for 5 stalls. Bennett asked that a new drawing and a detailed budget be brought back to the next Public Works meeting. Meeting adjourned at 5:55 P.M.