HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Meeting - Council - Agenda - 02/15/1994Agenda
CITY OF Z1204T
Mayor Jim White
Council Members
Judy Woods, President
I Jim Bennett Jon Johnson
Tim Clark Paul Mann
Christi Houser Leona Orr
February 15, 1994
Office of the City Clerk
IT
CITY OF Jai: M
SUMMARY AGENDA
KENT CITY COUNCIL
1 MEETING
February 15,
94
Council Chambers
7:00 p.m•
COUNCILMEMBERS: Judy Woods, President
MAYOR. Jim White Tim Clark Christi Houser
Jim BennettPaul Mann Leona Orr
Jon Johnson
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
1. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
A. King County Councilmember Chris Vance
B. Introduction of Mayor's Appointees
2. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. LID 343 - 111th Avenue SE Street Improvements (Kent-
Kangley to Sequoia Junior High)
3. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Approval of Minutes
B. Approval of Bills
C. Carpinito Business Park Rezone - Ordinance '
D. Animal Control Interlocal Agreement - Ordinance
E. Worker's Compensation Trust Account Transfer - Ordinance
F. Green River Trail Fence Project - Acceptance
G. Interurban Trail Bridge Replacement Project - Acceptance
H. R.V.'s Rest Stop - Naden Avenue - Authorization & Budget
I. Drinking Driver Task Force Appointment
J. Transit Advisory Board Appointment
K. Council Absence
4. OTHER BUSINESS
A. Ja;aes/Hobbs Annexation
?ones
5. BIDS
A. Signal at Jason & Reitan
6. CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS
7. REPORTS
8. ADJOURNMENT
NOTE: A copy of the full agenda packet is available for perusal in
the City Clerk's Office and the Kent Library.
An explanation of the agenda format is given on the back of
this page.
Any person requiring a disability accommodation should contact the
City in advance for more information. For TDD relay service call
1-800-635-9993 or the City of Kent (206) 854-6587.
11�
PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
Citizens wishing to address the Council will, at this time,
make known the subject of interest, so all may be properly
heard.
A) King County Councilmember Chris Vance
B) Introduction of Mayor's Appointees
Kent City Council Meeting
Date February 15, 1994
Category Public Hearings
1. SUBJECT: LID 343 - 111TH AVENUE SE STREET IMPROVEMENTS
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: This date has been set for the public
hearing on LID 343, Street Improvements on 111th Avenue SE from
Kent Kangley Road to Sequoia Junior High School. The Public
Works Director will give a brief description of the project as
well as other pertinent information.
3. EXHIBITS: Public Works Director Memorandum and vicinity map
4. RECOMMENDED BY: Council Action
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended ✓
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED:
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
OPEN HEARING:
PUBLIC INPUT:
CLOSE HEARING:
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
to direct the City Attorney to prepare the Ordinance creating
LID 343, for the improvement of 111th Avenue SE from Kent
Kangley Road to Sequoia Junior High School.
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 2A
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
February 11, 1994
TO: Mayor White & C'ty Council
Plu
FROM: Don Wickstroff', Director of Public Works
RE: LID 343 - 111th Ave SE Street Improvements
(Kent-Kangley Rd. to Sequoia Jr. High)
BACKGROUND
The City of Kent has received a request for the installation of
sidewalk on 111th Ave SE leading to Sequoia Junior High School.
The Council's Public Works Committee has directed staff to proceed
with the formation of a Local Improvement District (LID) for the
construction and financing of the necessary street improvements and
sidewalks. A property owner meeting was held July 28, 1993 to
discuss the proposal.
The City is proposing to fund a portion of the project cost with
the remaining funds being provided by the formation of Local
Improvement District (LID). Therefore, Resolution No. 1382 was
adopted by City Council on January 18, 1994 establishing February
15, 1994 for the public hearing on the formation of LID 343.
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
The project consists of upgrading the roadway to City Standards
including the following features:
1. 36 feet wide road curb to curb (pavement
widening as necessary).
2. Curb and gutter.
3. Sidewalks both sides adjacent to curb (6.5
wide cement concrete).
4. Drainage improvements.
5. Relocation of utilities and other improvements
as required.
6. Asphalt overlay of existing pavement.
7. Channelization and signing.
8. Driveways constructed in the curb and sidewalk
at existing driveways.
9. Street lighting on power poles.
PROJECT FUNDING
The total estimated cost for the construction of the proposed
project including engineering, survey, construction inspection and
LID costs and associated bonding costs is $141,512.14. This figure
also includes a 10% construction contingency factor.
The City is proposing to fund 30% of the project total which based
on the cost estimate is $39,138.00. The balance of $91,322.00
shall be funded by the LID. LID bonding and associated costs are
estimated at $11,052.14. This gives an LID assessment total of
$102,374.14.
ASSESSMENT METHOD
The LID cost is distributed to the properties located on this
section of 111th Avenue based on front footage along the roadway.
Most of the properties are obligated by covenant to install the
improvements across their frontage. Without and LID, each property
would be faced with the cost of half of the street for the length
of the property. Therefore with the LID, the front footage method
gives a similar cost distribution.
NEED FOR IMPROVEMENT
The properties adjacent to the project are zoned office. Also a
school is located at the end of 111th Ave SE. As such, substantial
pedestrian traffic is generated. City Standards therefore require
that City streets such as this, have sidewalks to address the
pedestrian traffic. Sidewalks and other street improvements are
required to bring 111th Avenue up to current City Standards.
This need has been recognized for many years. Various properties
within the LID have been required to execute no protest LID
covenants for street improvements including sidewalks upon
obtaining various development permits. Currently there are
covenants representing 79.70% of the LID which includes 5 of the 6
properties involved.
SUPPORT FOR LID
As stated above, property owners representing 70.70% of the LID
assessments are committed to this LID via LID no protest covenants.
Since it takes only 40% support to allow an LID to be formed,
Council thus has the option of proceeding with the project based on
the covenants.
2
ENVIRONMENTAL
The Engineering Department has received a determination of non-
significance from the Planning Department.
PAYMENT OF ASSESSMENT
Upon Council passing, the ordinance confirming the final assessment
roll (after completion of the construction), there is a 30 -day
period in which any portion or all of the assessment can be paid
without interest charges. After the 30 -day period, the balance is
paid over a ten year period wherein each year's payment is 1/10th
of the principal plus interest on the unpaid balance. The interest
will be what the market dictates.
T1964
KI
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
OCTOBER 6, 1993
TO: PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE
FROM: DON WICKSTROM
RE: SIDEWALKS AT SEQUOIA JR. HIGH
Last April a request was brought before the Committee regarding the
installation of sidewalks on 111th Ave SE. This is the access road
to Sequoia Jr. High. It was determined that sufficient properties
had executed No -Protest LID Covenants for street improvements
including sidewalks and that an LID could be formed. Therefore,
the Committee unanimously agreed to proceed with the formation of
the LID. The first step would be a public meeting with the
affected property owners. The results, including cost estimates
and property owner input would then come back to the Committee for
further direction as to pursuing the LID.
Since that Committee meeting, cost estimates and preliminary
assessments have been calculated and a public meeting was held.
Property owners were asked to complete a questionnaire stating
their preference regarding the LID formation.
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
The project consists of upgrading the roadway to City standards
including the following features:
1. 36 Foot wide road curb to curb (pavement widening as
necessary).
2. Curb and gutter.
3. Sidewalks both sides adjacent to curb (6.5 wide cement
concrete).
4. Drainage improvements to allow filling of the ditches and
curb and gutter installation.
5. Relocation of utilities and other improvements as
required.
6. Asphalt overlay of existing pavement.
7. Channelization and signing including two traveled lanes,
bike lanes, and left turn pockets at Kent-Kangley.
8. Driveways constructed in the curb and sidewalk at
existing driveways.
9. Street lighting on power poles.
1
PROJECT COST
The total estimated cost for the construction of the proposed
project including engineering, survey, construction inspection and
LID costs and associated bonding costs is $141,512.14. This figure
also includes a lo% construction contingency factor.
The City is proposing to fund 30% of the project total which based
on the cost estimate is $39,135.00. The balance of $91,322.00
shall be funded by the LID. LID bonding and LID associated
costs
are
estimated at $11,052.14. This gives
of
$102,374.14. See attachment for individual property assessments.
QUESTIONNAIRE RESULTS
Questionnaire results are as follows:
Proceed with the LID 0%52,49% (#4 & 6)
Do not proceed with the LID 47,51% (#1, 2, 3, & 5)
Did not return questionnaire
To approve an LID, property owners with combined LID assessments
representing 40 percent of the total assessment must support the
LID.
The City has determined that owners with a combined 79.70 percent
of the total LID assessment are at this time obligated to
participate in this street improvement LID via executed no -protest
covenants. Therefore, Council could proceed with the LID formation
based on the No Protest Covenants.
PROPERTY OWNER COMMENTS
#6 - Edward Stein feels his assessment is excessive, however would
consider supporting an LID with a smaller e arssment. He suggested
u gested
that the school and City should pay ger
shareSee attached letter.
t they are
havingegf nancial 1 problems and Vewould tr not be stated
be abteto pay the
assessment.
#5 - Kent School District (Glen Anderson) stated that the project
is much more extensive than what they were originally requesting.
They were not asking for a complete street improvement, with
sidewalks on both sides. Their concept was an asphalt path, on one
side only, from the school to Kent Kangley. They were proposing to
fund the portion along the school property frontage. The request
was for the City to fund the portion between the school property
and Kent Kangley with City sidewalk funds. The propertyowner with
that portion of the frontage (16 on the map)
had nded
negatively when the district approached him regarding funding the
2
asphalt path proposal.
Anderson also stated that while the district would not oppose the
LID formation, they would not support the project either.
#11 2, & 3 - Masami and Malio 0. Hasegawa did not respond or
comment.
SUMMARY
The School District is obligated to construct their portion of the
road improvements prior to March 8, 1999. Therefore, an asphalt
path or walkway placed to avoid impacting the drainage system is
only an interim temporary solution. Any money spent now would be
lost when the eventual road improvements are constructed.
Although the City could provide additional funding to make the LID
more attractive, the currently proposed 30% City share is very
generous for a local street. Generally, the improvement of local
access streets is the responsibility of the adjacent property
owners.
Five of the six parcels involved have executed LID covenants for
roadway improvements. The City could have required actual
construction of the improvements at the time but allowed the
improvements to be deferred through the execution of the covenant.
The Public Works Department recommends that City money should not
be used for interim improvements and that if anything is to be
built, the roadway as proposed herein and required by covenant,
should be constructed at this time.
3
PROPOSED LID
111TH AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENTS
JULY 12, 1993
NAME PRELIMINARY
ASSESSMENTASSESSMENT
NUMBER (From King County Tax Rolls)
*1 Masami & Malio O. Hasegawa $ 51726.65
*2. Masami & Malio O. Hasegawa $ 61857.66
*3. Masami & Malio O. Hasegawa $ 61941.17
*4 Sequoia Baptist Church $ 32,961.62 *5. Kent School District #415 $ 29,110.45
20,776.59
6. Edward J. Stein
TOTAL ASSESSMENT $102,374.14
*Indicates street improvement covenant signed by property owner.
Covenant Total $ 81,597.55
79.70%
As explained in the letter, 79.70% of the property owners are at
this time obligated to participate in this street improvement via
executed no protest covenants. The final decision of whether
or
not to form the LID, however, will be made by y
Therefore your input regarding the project is important to the
decision making process.
Edward J. Stein, D.C.
and Associates, P.S.
Doctors of Chiropractic
(206) 852-1963
11109 Kent Kang(ey Road, Kent, Washington 98031
July 29,1993
Mr.Merrill K Vesper
Re: LID 111th Ave
As was discussed at preliminary meeting I would be able to
to support the L.I.D. if the financial contribution from the
City of Kent and Kent School District was increased. My reasoning
is based on the fact that this improvement is to address public
safety and access to a public school. This then represents a
financial responsibility of the general public in the Kent area
w rather than limited to the improvement of a few properties which
happen to be adjacent to the Public School.
Sincerely,
Edward J.Stein, C.
EJS/epa
4
T
2012
, r I
j 29
r Bo3weccn 1
r O fly,80304 �,7
I
r
r' r
' r BB]weCal JO
n = r-,!
. 3 *,
' L.LD.BOUNDARY �
I �TiiT177"TT1tTTTfTHTTTI*—� :iJ ' � Isa]a.zz��
w�TTTtTTTTITiT 1.. < \-
�' ii _�'.fl Wllltll����nti
ED
r 0 Eta r
PROJECT C
LOCATION
eB3a+zze¢ .
r
r r
r
. :
r .
1 r
r r
I : -
O �- L.I.D. ASSESSMENT NUMBER
r
r
:
:
?23591+3 = e'exa+22a:9
r � r
TAX LOT NUMBER
:
r r
r r
r r
r r
r r
359:83 r
r
r �
* L.I.D. COVENANT
ee3wccwa
r
r r
r r
r
9101 r _
_—__�__—__�ffffH ffttTffHftl ffF##tlfHfffHiffT�H77ff1Hf HitflffHfFlTf7TTfiif tTlTT1T11fiY__—__—_
PROPOSED L.I.D.
111TH AVE. STREET IMPROVEMENT
(KENT-KANGLEY ROAD TO SEQUOIA JR. HIGH)
JUNE 30. 1993
J�/
CONSENT CALENDAR
3. city council Action:
Councilmembermove ,
seaends that Conse, Calendar Items A through K be approved
Ccs d
Discussion IIr c
Action nA �i ca V -V, Ce- f �- �
3A. Approval of Minutes.
Approval of the minutes of the regular Council meeting of
February 11 1994.
3B. Approval of Bills.
Approval of payment of the bills received through January 31,
1994 after auditing by the operations Committee at its meeting
on February 1, 1994.
Approval of checks issued for vouchers -- payment dates
January 13,14, 23 & 31, 1994:
Date Check Numbers Amount
Approval of checks issued for payroll -- payment dates
January 5 & 20, 1994:
Date Check Numbers Amount
Council Agenda
Item No. 3 A -B
Kent, Washington
February 1, 1994
Regular meeting of the Kent City Council was called to order at
7:00 p.m. by Mayor White. Present: Councilmembers Bennett,
Clark, Johnson, Mann, Orr and Woods, Operations Director/Chief of
Staff McFall, City Attorney Lubovich, Planning Director Harris,
Public Works Director Wickstrom, Police Chief Crawford, Fire
Chief Angelo, Acting Parks Director Thorell, and Acting Finance
Director Miller. Councilmember Houser was not in attendance.
PUBLIC North Park. Pam Newcomer, 839 3rd Avenue
COMMUNICATION North, voiced concern about a problem in the
North Park area involving the City and Triangle
Properties, and said she would like to have the
zoning changed. The City Attorney pointed out
that this matter is in litigation and suggested
that the neighborhoods' concerns be addressed
in a meeting with the Mayor's office, and a
report made to Council. Newcomer said she
would prefer to discuss the matter in public.
She noted that this began with the rezoning of
the Valley Floor and that at that time she
asked to have the neighborhood downzoned from
duplex to single family. She noted that the
only neighborhoods that were addressed in the
Area Housing Study were East Hill and West
Hill, and that North Park and South Park were
not recognized as viable neighborhoods at that
time. She added that Triangle Properties
proposed to build apartments and that they said
they would not use 4th Avenue for access. She
noted that Mayor White has said he is uncom-
fortable with traffic on these streets, and
that while the City has an obligation to grant
access, they must also protect the neighbor-
hood. She said she would like to see the
Triangle Property downzoned to single family,
or to see a park made out of the property. She
did not object to using First, Second and Third
Avenues if the zoning were single family.
Mayor White asked staff to look into this
matter and submit a written report to Council.
George Plemmons, 753 3rd Avenue North, voiced
concern about losing parking spaces and pro-
perty. He noted that if 130 apartment units
were built, it would result in 1000 additional
trips from 3rd Avenue onto James every day. He
suggested traffic control strips on Third
Avenue and a light at Third Avenue and James.
February 11 1994
PUBLIC The Mayor noted that the City will be in
COMMUNICATION contact with Mr. Plemmons and Ms. Newcomer.
Oath of office. The City Clerk administered
the Oath of Office to Councilmember Orr.
Ms. Orr was officially sworn in on January 20,
1994.
1994 Communit Arts Grant Awards. Acting Parks
Director Patrice Thorell introduced the 1994
Community Arts Grant Award Recipients as
follows and thanked them for their contri-
butions to the community:
The Imperials Music & Youth Organization, Kent
Parks Resource Center, Kent Reading Council,
Kent Saturday Market, the Montage Acting
Society of Kent, Northwest Renaissance Poets &
Publishers, Project Lighthouse, Rainier Chorale
and Rainier Symphony. Thorell also recognized
the Kent Arts Commissioners, and encouraged
citizens to participate in and attend the many
cultural opportunities afforded our community
by these groups.
Employee of the Month. Mayor White announced
that Diane Sullivan has been selected as
Employee of the Month for February. He noted
that Ms. Sullivan works for the Public Works
Operations Division as an Accounting Techni-
cian, and has been with the City for almost
19 years. He said that she demonstrates her
care and loyalty to her job through her enthu-
siasm and positive attitude. Timms nI
Public Works Operations Manager, added that
Ms. Sullivan has worked very hard getting the
new computer program on line and expressed his
appreciation.
Dau nLers v1 6,.W �----- - -
History Month. Mayor White read a proclamation
noting that the Lakota Chapter of Daughters of
the American Revolution has long recognized the
need for all of us to reflect and learn from
our past experiences in order for our nation to
continue to thrive, and proclaiming the month
of February, 1994, as Daughters of the
American Revolution/American History Month. He
February 1, 1994
PUBLIC encouraged all citizens to join him in this
COMMUNICATION observancer
and
of tpresentedhe Lakota Chapthe ter -
Introduction
to
Introduction of Mayor's Appointees. Mayor
White introduced Carl Hart, Carol McPherson,
Ron Banister, Dee Moschel, Constance Stockton
and Melvin Tate, who have recently been
appointed to various Boards and Commissions.
Regional Justice Center Update. Wendy Keller,
Project Manager, presented a model of the site
and pointed out the parking areas. She noted
that the parking study has been completed and
that proposed parking on the site is for 700
cars. She added that the study has been turned
over to the City for review. She pointed out
that the highest use impact at the building's
full use would be 704 people on the site at
1:30 p.m and clarified for Clark that this
figure includes everyone, not just staff. She
noted that the County will be very busy in
March on the design of this project, that a
demolition plan and SEPA checklist will most
likely be submitted to the City's technical
staff within two weeks, and that remediation
bids are due in two weeks.
CONSENT
BENNETT MOVED that Consent Calendar Items A
and the
CALENDAR
through L be approved. Orr seconded
motion carried.
MINUTES
(CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3A)
of Minutes. APPROVAL of the minutes
Approval
of the regular Council meeting of January 18,
1994.
HEALTH &
(CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3K)
Lindental Meadows. AUTHORIZATION to accept the
SANITATION
bill of sale and warranty agreement submitted
by William E. Ruth for continuous operation and
maintenance of 1,086 feet of watermain, 21070
feet of sanitary sewer, 21336 feet of storm
improvements and
sewer and 740 feet of street
release of bonds after expiration of the main-
tenance period, as recommended by the Public
Works Committee. The project is in the
SE 265th Street.
vicinity of 114th Avenue SE &
3
February 1, 1994
WATER (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3L)
Rent Springs Transmission Main Phase II.
AUTHORIZATION to accept as complete the
contract with Robison Construction, Inc. for
the Kent Springs Transmission Main Phase II
project, and release of retainage after receipt
of State releases, as recommended by the Public
Works Committee.
REZONE (OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4C)
Car inito Business Park Rezone RZ-93-3. This
date has been set for a public meeting to
consider the Hearing Examiner's recommendation
of approval of an application to rezone 3.0
acres from GWC, Gateway Commercial, to CM -1,
Commercial Manufacturing. The property is
located on the south side of So. 222nd Street,
approximately 250 feet east of 84th Ave. South.
ORR MOVED to accept the findings of the Hearing
Examiner, and to adopt the Hearing Examiner's
recommendation of approval of the Carpinito
Business Park Rezone RZ-93-31 and to direct the
City Attorney to prepare the necessary ordi-
nance. Bennett seconded and the motion
carried.
FINAL PLAT (OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4D)
Cedar Meadows Final Plat FSU -90-4. This date
has been set for a public meeting to consider
an application for the Cedar Meadows Final
Plat. The subject property is 3.5 acres in
size and is located at S.E. 228th Place and
116th Ave. S.E. The Council approved the Cedar
Meadows Preliminary Plat on December 4, 1990.
ORR MOVED to approve the Cedar Meadows Final
Plat as recommended by staff. Woods seconded
and the motion carried. Steve Chatman, 11410
S.E. 229th Street, voiced concern about
drainage in the area and asked what recourse
is available if drainage problems continue.
Wickstrom explained that the City would try to
resolve any problems, but that he is not
aware that problems still exist as a result of
this development. The Mayor suggested that
Mr. Chatman contact Mr. Wickstrom or himself if
problems arise. Max Fullner, 22809 116th
Avenue S.E., noted that the entrance to his
4
February 1, 1994
FINAL PLAT
property has been restricted, due to con-
about a
struction, and expressed concern
uld be assafety
peak withhazard.
vertical curb which
White suggested
Mayor
Mr. Wickstrom to see if this concern can be
out for
addressed right away. Johnson pointed
that the applicant is required to
Mr. Chatman
submit a follow-up report and allow an oppor-
tunity for the public to comment on it, and
bond that could
that the developer must post a
be used to correct problems.
CAPITAL
(CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3E)
Facilities Plan.
FACILITIES
Workshop on Capital
AUTHORIZATION to set March 81 1994, as the date
PLAN
for a workshop on the Capital Facilities Plan.
ANNEXATION
Chestnut Ridge Annexation. George Kresovich,
representing Schneider Homes, noted
attorney
that he has contacted the City before regarding
the Copper Ridge Project which was proposed to
King County, and then the property was annexed
He noted
in the Chestnut Ridge Annexation.
that he has met with the Council Planning
Committee, the City Attorney's Office, and the
to
Planning Department to determine how resolve
the conflicts, but that an impasse has been
reached. He noted that there has been a care-
ful risk analysis to the City and asked
Administration to inquire about this, perhaps
in executive session, and report back to them
litigation.
regarding alternatives to avoid
Ron Harmon, 20627 95th Avenue South, noted that
he has attended all the Planning Commission
meetings and Council hearings, and that strong
support was expressed for the resolutions being
proposed tonight. He urged the Council to
consider the testimony given at those meetings.
(EXECUTIVE At 8:05 p.m. Mayor White announced an executive
SESSION) session of approximately 15 minutes to discuss
potential litigation.
The meeting reconvened at 8:25 p.m. The City
Attorney noted that discussion was held regard-
ing potential litigation matters involving the
Copper Ridge development in the Chestnut Ridge
Annexation Area.
61
February 1, 1994
ANNEXATION (OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4A)
Chestnut Ridge Comprehensive Plan Map Designa-
tion CPA -93-2. On January 18, 1994, the
Council tabled this item until this date so
that the Chestnut Ridge Zoning and compre-
hensive Plan Map Designation would be in
conformity with one another. During its
January 18th meeting, Council made changes to
the proposed initial zoning, resulting in a
need to change the Comprehensive Plan Map.
Exhibit A of the proposed resolution depicts
the newest proposed Comprehensive Plan Map
amendment. The staff memo dated February 11
1994, discusses a single family overlay for
Chestnut Ridge which was part of the Planning
Commission's recommendation, but which was not
included in the Council's action on the matter.
The proposed resolution includes the amendment
to the single family overlay, as recommended by
the Planning Commission.
Planning Manager Satterstrom pointed out the
changes on the map and reiterated that the
resolution contains the recommendation by the
Planning Commission to include the single
family designated overlay.
WOODS MOVED to adopt Resolution No. 1384 for
the Chestnut Ridge Annexation Area amending the
City -Wide Comprehensive Land Use Map as
depicted in Exhibit A and amending the single
family overlay. Orr seconded and the motion
carried.
(OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4B)
Chestnut Ridge Initial Zoning AZ -93-1. On
January 18, 1994, the Council amended the
Planning Commission's Alternative No. 1 recom-
mendation to change the R1-9.6 designation to
RA for the Chestnut Ridge Annexation Initial
Zoning. The proposed ordinance incorporates
the Council's amendment and Exhibit A indicates
the changes.
WOODS MOVED to adopt Ordinance No. 3154
designating zoning for the entire Chestnut
Ridge Annexation Area (AZ -93-1) as single
family, and that, based on public testimony and
C:
February 1, 1994
ANNEXATION the information presented regarding sensitive
areas and steep slopes, the area recommended by
the Planning Commission as R1-9.6 be zoned as
RA. Orr seconded and the motion carried.
(OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4E)
Ramstead/East Hill Annexation. On July 20,
1993, the City received a 60% petition for the
Ramstead/East Hill Annexation. Council
authorized the circulation of the petition in
October of 1991. The signatures on the peti-
tion have been verified and a Determination of
Non -Significance per the SEPA process has been
issued. The annexation encompasses approxi-
mately 594 acres within the southeasterly
corner of the City. It has an assessed value
of $68,928,209 and an estimated population of
1540 people. MANN MOVED to accept the 60%
annexation petition and direct the Public Works
staff to file the Notice of Intent document for
review and approval by the Boundary Review
Board. Woods seconded and the motion carried.
(CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3C)
Jones/Hobbs Annexation (AN -94-1).
AUTHORIZATION to set February 15, 1994, as the
date to meet with the initiators of the Jones/
Hobbs Annexation, an approximately 25 acre area
of the northwest corner of 100th Avenue S.E.
and So. 222nd Street.
TRANSIT (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3D)
Workshop on Transit. AUTHORIZATION to set
February 15, 1994, as the date, and 5:30 p.m.
as the time, for a workshop relating to
transit.
POLICE (OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4F)
Drinking Driver Task Force - Endorsement of
Legislative Package. In a letter dated
December 20, 1993 to Councilmember Woods, the
Drinking Driver Task Force Steering Committee
requested that the City Council adopt a 1994
legislative package including the following
items for consideration by the State
Legislature:
1) amend safety restraint laws to allow
primary enforcement;
7
February 11 1994
POLICE 2)
prohibit people from riding in open cargo
beds of trucks;
3)
require child restraint devices through
4)
age 4;
support a 90 day administrative license
suspension for any driver under age 21 at
zero blood alcohol tolerance;
5)
tighten the eligibility requirements and
supervision over deferred prosecution;
6)
re -authorize the Omnibus Drug Bill;
7)
prohibit possession of hand gun for anyone
under age of 21, with specified excep-
tions;
8)
amend constitution to allow DWI check-
points;
9)
revamp the juvenile court system;
10)
require mandatory server training through
WLCB or private sector classes, not a
video course.
WOODS MOVED to adopt a 1994 Legislative package
for consideration by the State Legislature to
include those items set forth in the Decem-
ber 20, 1993 Drinking Driver Task Force letter
to the Council President. Orr seconded. Upon
White's question, Woods explained that the Task
Force has requested the Council's support of
their lobbying for these ten items. The motion
then carried.
(OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4G)
(ADDED BY CITY ATTORNEY LUBOVICH)
Possession and Use of Firearms. Woods noted
that a resolution regarding possession and use
of firearms has been proposed by Father Duggan
of St. Anthony's Parish, and that copies have
been distributed to the Council. Lubovich
explained that this is presented on behalf of
the King County Organizing Project, and it asks
the City Council to support legislation that
would raise the age for possession and use of
firearms from 14 to 21 years of age, unless
accompanied by a parent, guardian or adult.
Father Duggan explained that their goal is to
prevent anyone under 21 from carrying guns in
public. Upon Mann's question, it was clarified
that this resolution would not enact legisla-
tion in Kent, but would support possible State
legislation, and that it would not affect
1.1
February 1, 1994
POLICE military uses since that would be under the
control of adults. Steve Chatman voiced con-
cern as to whether this type of legislation
would accomplish the goals. He noted that
youth carry guns for protection, and will carry
them with or without legislation. Bennett
concurred and said that the laws already in
place need to be enforced. WOODS MOVED to
adopt Resolution No. 1383. Clark seconded and
the motion carried.
APPOINTMENTS (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3G)
APPointment to Civil Service Commission.
CONFIRMATION of the Mayor's appointment of Carl
Hart to serve as a member of the Kent Civil
Service Commission. Mr. Hart is employed by
Bell Anderson Insurance Agency in Kent and has
served as a member of the Board of Directors of
Kent Youth and Family Services and has also
served on the Board of the Southeast Community
Alcohol and Drug Center. He will replace Raul
Ramos, who resigned, and his term will continue
to 4/30/94.
(CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3H)
Appointment to Kent Arts Commission.
CONFIRMATION of the Mayor's appointment of
Carol McPherson to serve as a member of the
Kent Arts Commission. Ms. McPherson will
replace Marci Hobbs whose term expired. Her
term will continue to 10/31/97.
(CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3I)
Reappointment to Kent Economic Development
Corporation. CONFIRMATION of the Mayor's re-
appointment of Ron Banister to continue serving
as a member of the Kent Economic Development
Corporation. Mr. Banister's new appointment
will continue to 12/31/97.
(CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3J)
Appointments to Kent Human Services commission.
CONFIRMATION of the Mayor's appointments of Dee
Moschel, Constance Stockton, and Melvin Tate to
serve as members of the Kent Human Services
Commission.
Constance Stockton, who has been serving the
Commission as a representative of the "Service
01
February 1, 1994
APPOINTMENTS Club" category will move to the "Non -Voting
Agency" representative position. She will
replace Peg Mazen, whose term expired, and her
new appointment will continue to 1/1/96.
Dee Moschel will serve as the "Service Club"
representative to the Commission through her
long association with Kent Soroptimists.
Ms. Moschel has also served as a member of the
Human Services Commission previously and was
Chair for one year. She will replace
Ms. Stockton and her term will continue to
1/1/96.
Melvin Tate will serve in the "Regional Agency"
position. He is Community Outreach Coordinator
for the Kent School District and the present
Chairman of the Project Lighthouse Steering
Committee. He will replace Tim Clark who
vacated his position when he became a Kent City
Council Member. Mr. Tate's term will be in
effect until 1/1/96.
COUNCIL (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3F)
Council Absence. APPROVAL of a request for an
excused absence from the February 15, 1994,
City Council meeting from Council President
Woods. She will be out of town and unable to
attend.
FINANCE (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3B)
Approval of Bills. APPROVAL of payment of the
bills received through January 31, 1994 after
auditing by the Operations Committee at its
meeting on February 1, 1994.
Approval.of checks issued for vouchers:
Date Check Numbers Amount
1/1 - 1/31 138751-139768 $4,599,430.83
Approval of checks issued for payroll: Amount
Date Check Numbers
1/20/94 Check 191894-192241 $ 278,389.18
Advice 12381-12718 407 684.29
$ 686,073.47
2/4/94 Check 192242-192609 $ 277,272.88
Advice 12719-13057 414.935.86
$ 692,208.74
10
February 1, 1994
REPORTS Mayor White introduced Brent McFall, Operations
Director and Chief of Staff, and welcomed him
to the City.
Council President. Woods requested that
Committee Chairs set up meeting times and
announce them as soon as possible.
Woods noted that the Suburban Cities Associ-
ation will meet next Wednesday, and that
reservations should be made through Jan
Banister.
Woods announced that the Council Retreat will
begin at 4:00 p.m. on March 4, 1994, at the
West Hill Fire Station.
ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 8:35 p.m.
Brenda Ja e , CMC
City Cle
11
Kent City Council Meeting
Date February 15, 1994
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: CARPINITO BUSINESS PARK REZONE (RZ-93-3) 44
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Adoption of Ordinance No. 1155 approving
the Carpinito Business Park Rezone (RZ-93-3) as discussed by.
the City Council on January 18, 1994.
3. EXHIBITS: Ordinance
4. RECOMMENDED BY: city Council
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO ✓ YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
econds
Council Agenda
Item No. 3C
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the
City of Kent, Washington, rezoning
approximately 3.0 acres of a 4.5 acre site
from GWC, Gateway Commercial, to CM -1,
Commercial Manufacturing.
WHEREAS, on September 8, 1993, an application for a
rezone was filed by Stiefel Engineering, on behalf of the owners
of a 4.5 acre site requesting a rezone of approximately 3.0 acres
of the property from GWC, Gateway Commercial, to CM -1, Commercial
Manufacturing; and
WHEREAS, on September 30, 1993, an environmental
Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS), without conditions, was
issued by the Kent Planning Department; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing on the rezone request was
held before the Hearing Examiner on December 1, 1993; and
WHEREAS, the Hearing Examiner issued findings that the
proposed rezone is consistent with the comprehensive plan, that
the proposed rezone and subsequent development of the site would
be compatible with development in the vicinity, that the proposed
rezone will not unduly burden the transportation system in the
vicinity of the property with significant adverse impacts which
cannot be mitigated, that circumstances have substantially
changed since the establishment of the current zoning district to
i
I�
i
warrant the proposed rezone, and that the proposed rezone will
not adversely affect the health, safety, and general welfare of
the citizens of the City of Kent; and
WHEREAS, these findings are consistent with the
standards for a rezone set forth in Section 15.09.050(A)(3) of
the Kent City Code; and
i
WHEREAS, on February 1, 1994, the Kent City Council
held a public meeting to consider the Hearing Examiner's
recommendation that the application to rezone 3.0 acres of the
subject 4.5 acre site from GWC, Gateway Commercial, to CM -1,
Commercial Manufacturing be approved; and
WHEREAS, the City Council moved to accept the findings
of the Hearing Examiner and to adopt the Hearing Examiner's
recommendation for approval of rezone RZ-93-3, also known as the
Carpinito Business Park rezone; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES
HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The subject property located on the south
side of South 222nd Street, approximately 200 feet east of 84th
Avenue South (East Valley Highway), comprising 3.0 acres of a 4.5
acre site and depicted in Exhibit A is rezoned from GWC, Gateway
Commercial, to CM -1, Commercial Manufacturing.
Section 2. Severability. If any section, sentence,
clause or phrase of this ordinance should be held to be invalid
or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such
2
invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity
for constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or
11phrase of this ordinance.
Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take
effect and be in force thirty (30) days from and after its
passage, approval and publication as provided by law.
JIM WHITE, MAYOR
ATTEST:
D.MZ11Ut1 Ut1l.V DGL[, \.112 l.1J�
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ROGER A. LUBOVICH, CITY ATTORNEY
PASSED
APPROVED
PUBLISHED
day of
day of
_ day of
3
1994.
1994.
1994.
!I
I hereby certify that this is a true copy of ordinance
j No. , passed by the City Council of the City of Kent,
;!Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the City of Kent as
hereon indicated.
(SEAL)
BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK
carpin.ord
4
City of Kent - Planning Department EXHIBIT A
APPLICATION NAME: Carpinito Business Park
NUMBER: #RZ-93-3
REQUEST: Rezone
Zoning / Topography
DATE: Dec. 1, 1993
LEGEND
Application site
Zoning boundary
Kent City Limits
WN
Kent City Council Meeting
Date February 15, 1994
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: ANIMAL CONTROL INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Adoption of Ordinance No.IL5__ amending
Chapter 8.03 of the Kent City Code to reflect licensing,
impound, sheltering and redemption fee increases pursuant to
the City's Interlocal Agreement with King County for Animal
Control Services.
3. EXHIBITS: Ordinance
4. RECOMMENDED BY: Operations Committee
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO V"" YES
FISCALLPERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
3
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 3D
101ftP30 UIZLa)MZ[elm
AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the
City of Kent, Washington, amending Chapter
8.03 of the Kent City Code to reflect changes
in licensing, late penalties, impound,
redemption, and sheltering fees as required
by Interlocal Agreement with King County, and
repealing Section 8.03.310(C) and (D)
regarding impound procedures and repealing
Section 8.03.320(2)(a) -(e) prohibiting the
sale of animals to research facilities.
WHEREAS, the City of Kent contracts with King County's
Licensing and Regulatory Services Division for animal control
services pursuant to the Interlocal Cooperation Act, RCW 39.34;
and
WHEREAS, the County is authorized by Section 120 of the
King County Charter and King County Code 11.02.030 to render such
services and is agreeable to rendering such services on the terms
and conditions set forth by Interlocal Agreement and in
consideration of payment, mutual covenants and agreements set
forth therein; and
WHEREAS, the parties wish to renew their agreement for
animal control services through December 31, 1996; and
WHEREAS, the City has agreed to adopt regulations
consistent with the licensing, late penalties, impound redemption
and sheltering fees as set forth in King County's licensing
regulations; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES
HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Chapter 8.03 of the Kent City Code is
hereby amended as follows:
CHAPTER 8.03. ANIMAL CONTROL
Sec. 8.03.010. purpose.
It is declared the public policy of the city to secure
and maintain such levels of animal control as will protect human
health and safety, and to the greatest degree practicable,
prevent injury to property and cruelty to animal life. To this
end, it is the purpose of this chapter to provide a means of
licensing dogs, cats, animal shelters, hobby kennels, kennels and
pet shops and controlling errant animal behavior so that it shall
not become a public nuisance and to prevent cruelty to animals.
Sec. 8.03.020. Intent.
It is the city council's intent that the regulation and
i control of potentially dangerous or dangerous dogs as defined in
RCW 16.08.070 should apply in the city through enforcement by the
city's interlocal agreement with King County. It is the city
council's further intent that the enforcement standards as
provided for in RCW 16.08.070 et seq. should control over any
other local standard of enforcement for such dangerous or
potentially dangerous dogs as provided for in this chapter.
2
,!Sec. 8.03.030. Definitions.
i�
The following words, terms and phrases, when used in
i
ithis chapter, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this
section, except where the context clearly indicates a different
meaning:
Abatement means the termination of any violation by
reasonable and lawful means determined by the director in order
that an owner or a person presumed to be the owner shall comply
with this chapter.
Animal means any living creature except persons,
insects and worms.
Animal control authority means the King County animal
control division, department of general services, acting alone or
in concert with other municipalities for enforcement of animal
control laws and the shelter and welfare of animals.
Animal control officer means any individual employed,
contracted or appointed by the animal control authority for the
purpose of aiding in the enforcement of this chapter or any other
law or ordinance relating to the licensing of animals, control of
animals or seizure and impoundment of animals, and includes any
state or municipal peace officer, sheriff, constable or other
employee whose duties in whole or in part include assignments
which involve the seizure and taking into custody of any animal.
Animal Rescuer means any individual who routinely
obtains an unwanted dog or cat or who locates within 90 days an
adoptive home for that spayed or neutered dog or cat provided
however, an interim administrative extension may be granted by
the animal control authority for a maximum of six months if a dog
or cat is pregnant nursing or injured and that condition is
verified by a veterinarian
3
Cattery means a Iplace where four or more adult cats are
kept, whether by owners of the cats or by persons providing
facilities and care whether or not for compensation, but not
includin small animal hospital, clinic or Pet shop, An adult
cat is one of either sex altered or unaltered that has reached
an age of six months.
Dangerous dog means that term as defined by RCW
16.08.070, and sections 8.03.220 through 8.03.250.
Director means the individual in charge of and
responsible for the King County animal control division of the
department of general services.
Domesticated animal means any dog, cat, rabbit, horse,
mule, ass, bovine animal, lamb, goat, sheep or hog, bird, or
other animal made to be domestic.
Euthanasia means the humane destruction of an animal
accomplished by a method that involves instantaneous
unconsciousness and immediate death, or by a method that causes
painless loss of consciousness, and death during such loss of
consciousness.
Grooming parlor means any place or establishment,
public or private, where animals are bathed, clipped or combed,
whether or not for compensation, for the purpose of enhancing
their aesthetic value.
Harboring keeping or maintaining a dog or cat means
'Performing any of the acts of providing care shelter
rotection refucre, food or nourishment in such manner as to
control the animals actions or, that the animal(s) is treated as
living at one's house by the homeowner.
Hobby cattery means a noncommercial cattery at or
adjoining a private residence where four or more adult cats are
bred or kept for exhibition for organized shows or for the
i
4
l`enioyment of the species provided, however, a combination hobby
cattery/kennel license may be issued where the total number of
cats and dogs exceeds the number allowed under Title 15 of the
1I Kent City Code.
Hobby kennel means a noncommercial kennel at or
adjoining a private residence where four (4) or more adult
animals are bred and/or kept for hunting, training and exhibition
for organized shows, field, working and/or obedience trials or
for enjoyment.
Juvenile means any dog or cat, altered or unaltered,
that is under the acre of six months.
Kennel means a place where four (4) or more adult dogs
or cats or any combination thereof are kept whether by owners of
the dogs and cats or by persons providing facilities and care,
whether or not for compensation, but not including a small animal
hospital or clinic or pet shop. An adult dog or cat is one of
either sex, altered or unaltered, that has reached the age of
€eur-(-4+ six (6) months.
Leash shall include a cord, thong or chain not more
than eight (8) feet in length by which an animal is controlled by
the person accompanying it.
Livestock means horses, bovine animals, sheep, goats,
swine, reindeer, donkeys, mules and fowl.
Owner means any person having an interest in or right
of possession to an animal or any person having control, custody
or possession of any animal, or who, by reason of the animal
being seen residing consistently in a location, may presume to be
the owner, and includes the definition as provided in RCW
RVIKiI IiIF&M
Pack of dogs means a group of three (3) or more dogs
running upon either public or private property not that of its
5
r1owner in a state in which either its control or ownership is in
doubt or cannot readily be ascertained, and when such dogs are
not restrained or controlled.
Person means any individual, partnership, firm, joint
stock company, corporation, association, trust, estate or other
legal entity.
Pet shop means a person or establishment that acquires
for the purpose of sale live animals, including birds, reptiles,
fowl and fish, bred by others whether as owner -agent, or on
consignment, and sells, or offers to sell such live animals,
including birds, reptiles, fowl and fish, to the public or to
retail outlets.
Potentially dangerous dog means that term as defined in
RCW 16.08.070 and sections 8.03.220 through 8.03.250 of this
Code.
Restraint means an animal is considered to be under
restraint if it is maintained and remains within the property
limits of its owner or keeper.
Running at large means to be off the premises of the
owner or on the premises of another without the written
permission of the owner thereof and not on a leash and not under
the control of the owner or competent person authorized by the
owner.
Service Animal means any animal which is trained or
being trained to aid a person who is blind hearing impaired or
otherwise disabled and is used for that purpose and is registered
I with a recognized service animal organization
Shelter means a facility which is used to house or
contain stray, homeless, abandoned or unwanted animals and which
is owned, operated or maintained by a public body, an established
humane society, animal welfare society, society for the
11prevention of cruelty to animals or other nonprofit organization
or person devoted to the welfare, protection and humane treatment
'!of animals.
Under control means the animal is under control so as
to be restrained from approaching any bystander or other animal
and from causing or being the cause of physical property damage
when off the premises of the owner.
Vicious means actions of animals, other than a
dangerous dog or potentially dangerous dog, with the propensity
to do any act that might endanger the safety of any person,
animal, property of another, including, but not limited to, a
disposition to mischief or fierceness as might occasionally lead
to attack on human beings without provocation, whether in play or
outbreak of untrained nature.
Sec. 8.03.040. License—Required-
A. Requirements. All dogs and cats harbored, kept or
maintained in city over four (4)s weeks of age shall be
licensed and registered annually; provided, that an altered two
year license may be purchased; provided, further, that dogs kept
in kennels need not be licensed, except as provided in section
8.03.080. This section shall not apply to dogs used by the police
department for police work.
B. Identification tags tattoos. All license tags
issued as provided in section 8.03.050 shall be securely fixed to
a substantial collar, harness or other means which shall be worn
by the dog at all times. As an alternative to a license tag, an
animal may be identified as licensed by being tattooed on its
right ear or on its inside right thigh or groin with a license
number approved or issued by the animal control authority.
7
msec. 8.03.050. Same` Lice=Fees.
j A. Dog and cat licenses shall be issued by the animal
,control authority upon application and payment of an annual
11 license fee to the county treasurer. Such license fees shall be
as established by the animal control division, department of
general servicest King County.
B. Residents sixty-five (65) years of age or older
shall be entitled to purchase a special permanent license for the
lifetime of cats or dogs which are neutered or shaved for which
they are the registered owners when the animals are maintained at
their owner's registered address. Eligible residents may purchase
the special permanent animal licenses at a cost as established by
the animal control division, department of general services, King
County, and they shall not be required to purchase a new license
annually for the lifetime of such licensed animals.
C. No person shall be granted more than three (3)
special permanent animal licenses for any combination of three
(3) cats and dogs for which such person is the registered owner.
D. The animal control authority is authorized to
enact the necessary rules and procedures to efficiently implement
the program. The annia_ jieen`f- eaeh-yea7r-- :
Pet licenses for unaltered dons and
d-.+o of
l�
licenses for altered do s and cats will be valid for two
Applications for dog or cat licenses shall be on forms provided
by the animal control authority. No proration of a license fee
for a portion of the calendar year shall be made. Renewal
licenses will retain the ori inal ex iration eriod whether
- -,,...nl mnnth.
n
jl
paid b owners of dangerous
iI E. An annual fee shall be p Y ,
,or potentially dangerous dogs as provided in section 8.03.230.
F. All fees and fines collected under this chapter
shall be deposited in the county current expense fund.
G. Juvenile licenses must be obtained for pets from
four weeks to six months of age.
H. Owners of dogs and/or cats which hold valid
licenses from other jurisdictions and who move into Kinn County
may transfer the license by payinga transfer fee. Such license
shall maintain the original expiration date.
I. It shall be a violation of this chapter for any
person to sell or transfer ownership of any 1pet without a et
license. The King County animal control authority shall be
notified of the same address and telephone number of the new
owner by the person who sold or transferred the pet.
Sec. 8.03.060. &ame--Penalty.
In addition to paying the appropriate license fee, a
late penalty as established by the animal control division,
department of general services, King County, shall be charged on
all applications received thirty days after the date of renewal
April thirtieth ef eaeh-Yea7yt provided, however, that no late
penalty shall be charged if:
1. The owner submits proof of purchase of the animal
within the preceding thirty (30) days;
2. The owner has moved into the city within the
preceding thirty (3o) days;
3. The animal had been under the age which requires a
license (four (4) Rienthweeks);
4. The owner purchases the license voluntarily, prior
to in-person or field contact by animal control personnel; or
.i
9
j
5. The owner submits other proof deemed acceptable in
li
'the department's rules and regulations.
1I
1ISec. 8.03.070. &awe--Nonapplicability-
The provisions of sections 8.03.040--8.03.060 shall not
apply to dogs or cats in the custody of a veterinarian or animal
.shelter or whose owners are nonresidents temporarily within the
city for a period not exceeding thirty (30) days.
Sec. 8.03.080. Animal shelter, kennel, groomincr parlor, cattery,
hobby kennel, and pet shop license --Required.
It is unlawful for any person to keep or maintain any
animal shelter, kennel, grooming parlor, cattery, hobby kennel,
or pet shop within the city without first obtaining a license.
The fee for such license shall be as established by the animal
control division, department of general services, King County.
Each license and certificate of inspection issued pursuant to
this chapter shall be conspicuously displayed at the
establishment to which such license was issued. The license shall
be dated and numbered and shall bear the name of King County,
Washington, the name and address of the owner or keeper of the
establishment, and the expiration date of the license. The
license shall run for a period of one (1) year from the date of
purchase.
Sec. 8.03.090. &ante --Compliance with local zone and health
regulations.
A. Zoning compliance. The applicant for an or
animal shelter, kennel, grooming parlor, cattery, hobby kennel,
or pet shop license shall, prior to issuance of such license tie
animal she Ircenne! lieense,- present to the
10
animal control authority a any required zoning permit from the
'!city planning department.
B. Health inspection. Before an animal shelter,
!!kennel, grooming parlor, cattery, hobby kennel, or pet shop
license may be issued by the animal control authority, a
certificate of inspection from the Seattle -King County health
department or King County animal control division must be issued
showing that the animal shelter, kennel, grooming parlor,
cattery, hobby kennel, or pet shop is in compliance with hygienic
standards of this chapter or other applicable ordinances or
regulations.
Sec. 8.03.100. same --Reporting required.
Each animal shelter, kennel, grooming parlor, cattery,
hobby kennel, or pet shop shall provide a list to the animal
control authority, quarterly, based upon the calendar year, of
all dogs and cats auctioned off, given away, sold or otherwise
disposed of. The list shall include the origin, age and type of
dog or cat, and the name and address of the person to whom the
dog or cat was given or purveyed.
Sec. 8.03.110. Same Inspection.
It shall be the duty of the director, or his designee,
'of the Seattle -King County department of public health or the
animal control authority to make or cause to be made such
inspections as may be necessary to insure compliance with other
applicable sections of this chapter. The owner or keeper of an
animal shelter, kennel, grooming parlor, cattery, hobby kennel,
or pet shop shall admit to the premises, for the purpose of
making an inspection, any officer, agent or employee of the
Seattle -King County department of public health or animal control
authority at any reasonable time that admission is requested.
i
ISec. 8.03.120. Same--jnUnsanitary conditions unlawful.
It is unlawful to keep, use or maintain within the city
any animal shelter, kennel, grooming parlor, cattery hobby
kennel, or pet shop that is unsanitary, nauseous, foul or
offensive, or in any way detrimental to public health and/or
safety and not in compliance herewith. Failure to comply with
section 8.03.110 and this section may be cause for revocation or
denial of a license to use, keep or maintain such animal shelter,
kennel, grooming parlor, cattery, hobby kennel, or pet shop.
Sec. 8.03.130. Same"Conditions.
Animal shelters, kennels, grooming parlor, cattery,
hobby kennel, and pet shops shall meet the following conditions:
1. Housing facilities shall be provided the animals
and such shall be structurally sound and shall:
a. Be maintained in good repair;
b. Be designed so as to protect the animals from
injury;
C. Contain the animals; and
d. Restrict the entrance of other animals.
2. Electric power shall be supplied in conformance
with city, county, and state electrical codes adequate to supply
lighting and heating as may be required by this chapter. Water
shall be supplied at sufficient pressure and quantity to clean
indoor housing facilities and primary enclosures of debris and
excreta.
3. Suitable food and bedding shall be provided and
stored in facilities adequate to provide protection against
12
infestation or contamination by insects or rodents. Refrigeration j
!shall be provided for the protection of perishable foods.
4. Provision shall be made for the removal and
disposal of animal and food wastes, bedding, dead animals, and
,debris. Disposal facilities shall be maintained in a sanitary
condition, free from the infestation or contamination of insects,
rodents or disease, and from obnoxious or foul odors.
5. Washroom facilities, including sinks and toilets,
with hot and cold running water, must be conveniently available
for cleaning purposes, and a large sink or tub provided for the
purpose of washing utensils, equipment and facilities.
6. Sick animals shall be separated from those
appearing healthy and normal and, if for sale, shall be removed
from display and sale. Sick animals shall be kept in isolation
quarters with adequate ventilation to prevent contaminating
healthy animals.
7. There shall be an employee on duty at all times
during hours any shelter, kennel, grooming parlor, cattery, hobby
kennel, or pet shop is open.
8. An employee or owner shall come in to feed, water
and do the necessary cleaning of animals and birds on days the
shelter, kennel, grooming parlor, cattery, hobby kennel, or pet
shop is closed.
9. No person shall knowingly sell a sick or injured
animal or bird.
10. No person shall misrepresent an animal or bird to
a consumer in any way.
13
!(Sec. 8.03.140. Sase--Indoor facilities.
Animal shelters, kennels, arooming parlor cattery,
hobby kennel, and pet shops which have indoor housing facilities
'for animals and birds shall:
1or cooled to protect such
. Be sufficiently heated
animals from temperatures to which they are not normally
acclimatized.
2. Be adequately ventilated to provide for the health
of animals contained therein and to assist in the removal of foul
and obnoxious odors. Provision shall be made so that the volume
of air within any enclosed indoor facility shall be changed three
(3) times or more each hour. This may be accomplished through the
location and periodic opening of doors and windows. If fans or
ventilating equipment are used, they shall be constructed in
conformance with current standards of good engineering practice
with respect to noise and minimization of drafts.
3. Have sufficient natural or artificial lighting to
permit routine inspection and cleaning at any time of day. In
addition, sufficient natural or artificial lighting shall be
supplied in the area of sinks and toilets to provide for the
hygiene of animal caretakers.
4. Have interior wall and ceiling surfaces
constructed of materials which are resistant to the absorption of
moisture and odors, or such surfaces shall be treated with a
sealant or with paint when such materials are not originally
resistant to moisture or odors. Floor surfaces shall not be made
of unsealed wood. In addition, interior walls shall be
constructed so that the interface with floor surfaces is sealed
from the flow or accumulation of moisture or debris.
5. Contain a drainage system which shall be connected
to a sanitary sewer or septic tank system which conforms to the
14
;'standards of building codes in force within the city and shall be
;!designed to rapidly remove water and excreta in the cleaning of
such indoor housing facility under any condition of weather or
'temperature. This requirement shall not apply to hobby kennels
and pet shops. All indoor housing facilities for animals, fish,
or birds shall be maintained in a clean and sanitary condition
- and a safe and effective disinfectant shall be used in the
cleaning of such facilities.
6. Conform with all applicable development standards
of title 15, zoning.
Sec. 8.03.150. S-ame—Outdoor facilities.
Animal shelters, kennels, grooming parlor, cattery,
hobby kennel, and pet shops which have outdoor facilities for
animals and birds shall:
N 1. Be constructed to provide shelter from excessive
sunlight, rain, snow, wind, or other elements. In addition, such
facilities shall be constructed to provide sufficient space for
the proper exercise and movement of each animal contained
therein.
2. Be constructed to provide drainage and to prevent
the accumulation of water, mud, debris, excreta, or other
materials and shall be designed to facilitate the removal of
animal and food wastes.
3. Be constructed with adequate walls or fences to
contain the animals kept therein and to prevent the entrance of
other animals.
4. Shall conform with all applicable development
standards of title 15, zoning.
OU
%Sec. 8.03.160. Hobby kennel license --Required. person to
A. ricense required. It is unlawful for any p
,keep and maintain any dog or cat within the city for the purposes
,of a hobby kennel without obtaining a valid and subsisting
shall be established
license therefor. The fee for such license
by the animal control division, department of general services,
;King County.
B. Limitation of number of dogs and cats allowed. The
total number of dogs and cats over four (4) months of age kept by
a hobby kennel shall not exceed the total number authorized by
the King County animal control division based on the following
guidelines:
1. The number of animals permitted shall be
established by the King County animal control division based on
such factors as animal size, type and characteristics of the
breed and whether the amount of lot area contains five (5) acres'
or more; the maximum number of animals shall not exceed ten (10)
where the lot area contains thirty-five thousand (35,000) square
feet but less than five (5) acres and the maximum number shall
not exceed five (5) where the lot area is less than thirty-five
thousand (35,000) square feet.
2. All open run areas shall be completely
surrounded by a six-foot fence set back at least twenty (20) feet
from all property lines. appurtenances
3. No commercial signs or other
advertising the kennel are permitted on the property.
4. The director may require additional setback,
fencing, screening, or soundproofing requirements as deemed
necessary to insure the compatibility of the hobby kennel with
surrounding development.
16
5. The hobby kennel shall limit dog and cat
;reproduction to no more than twelve (12) offspring per license
i
year.
1 6. Each animal in the hobby kennel shall have
(current and proper immunization from disease according to the
animal's species and age. For dogs such shall consist, as a
.minimum, of DHL inoculation for dogs over three (3) months of age
and rabies inoculations for those over six (6) months of age.
Sec. 8.03.170. Grooming parlors --License required.
It is unlawful for any person to keep or maintain any
grooming parlor without first obtaining a valid and subsisting
license therefor. The fee for such license shall be as
established by the animal control division, department of general
services, King County. However, if the grooming parlor is
operated as a part of the business of a kennel, or a pet shop,
the fee shall be as established by the animal control division,
department of general services, King County. Such fee shall be in
addition to the fee established for a kennel or pet shop license.
Sec. 8.03.180. Same --Conditions.
Grooming parlors shall:
1. Not board animals but keep only dogs and cats for
a reasonable time in order to perform the business of grooming.
2. Provide such restraining straps for the dog or cat
while it is being groomed so that such animal shall neither fall
nor be hanged.
3. Sterilize all equipment after each dog or cat has
been groomed.
4. Not leave animals unattended before a dryer.
17
5. Neither prescribe nor administer treatment or
i
(medicine that is the province of a licensed veterinarian as
,'provided in RCW 18.92.010.
6. Not put more than one (1) animal in each cage.
7. Have floors and walls in rooms, pens and cages
used to retain animals or in areas where animals are clipped,
groomed or treated constructed of water -impervious material that
can readily be cleaned, and which must be maintained in good
repair.
g. Have hot and cold water conveniently available and
a large sink or tub provided (minimum size twenty-four (24)
inches by eighteen (18) inches by twelve (12) inches).
9. Have toilet and hand washing facilities with hot
and cold running water conveniently available for personnel
employed.
10. Have only equipment necessary to the operation of
the licensed establishment kept or stored on the premises which
shall only be stored in a sanitary or orderly manner.
11. Have all cages, pens, or kennels used for holding
animals kept in a clean and sanitary condition and disinfected on
a routine basis.
12. Comply with all applicable development standards
of title 15, zoning.
Sec. 8.03.190. Animal shelters, catt_— hobby kennelsi, guard
kennels, pet shops, grooming parlors, guard dog purveyors, g
dog trainers and guard dog owners --Additional conditions.
A. The director is authorized to promulgate rules and
regulations not in conflict with this chapter as they pertain to
the conditions and operations of animal shelters, catteries.
hobby kennels, kennels, pet shops, and grooming parlors, guard
M
;dog purveyors, guard dog trainers and guard dog owners. Such
;)rules and regulations shall be enacted in accordance with county
1procedures for adopting such rules and regulations.
B. The animal control authority may, in addition to
other penalties provided in this chapter, revoke, suspend or
refuse to renew any animal shelter, cattery, hobby kennel,
kennel, grooming parlor, pet shop, guard dog purveyor, guard dog
trainer license or guard dog registration upon good cause or for
failure to comply with any provision of this chapter, provided,
however, enforcement of such revocation, suspension or refusal
shall be stayed during the pendency of an appeal filed pursuant
to section 8.03.370.
Sec. 8.03.200. Same Licenses, registration --Revocation,
suspension refusal to renew, or _F____ .aiti-'J f eried
A. The animal control authority may, in addition to
other penalties provided in this title revoke, suspend, or
refuse to renew any animal shelter, cattery, hobby kennel,
kennel grooming parlor, pet shop guard dog purveyor, guard dog
trainer license or guard dog registration upon good cause or for
failure to comply with any provision of this title.
B. No applicant shall be issued an animal shelter,
cattery, hobby kennel, kennel, grooming parlor, pet shop, guard
dog purveyor, guard dog trainer license or guard dog registration
who has previously had such license or registration revoked, or a
renewal refused, for a period of one (1) year after the date of
revocation or refusal and until such applicant meets the
requirements contained in this chapter to the satisfaction of the
animal control authority.
19
I
Isec. 8.03.210. Animal nuisances defined.
For purposes of this section, violations of this
isection are nuisances and shall include but not be limited to the
following:
1. Any public nuisance relating to animal control
known at common law or in equity jurisprudence.
2. Animals, excluding household pets, such as dogs
and cats, but particularly horses, mules, rabbits, bovine
animals, lambs, goats, sheep, birds, hogs, chickens or other
animals made to be domestic, being kept in residential districts
on lots of less than twenty thousand (20,000) square feet.
3. A dog, whether or not dangerous or potentially
dangerous as defined by RCW 16.08.070, running at large within
the city.
4. Any domesticated animal, whether licensed or not,
which runs at large in any park or enters any public beach, pond,
fountain, or stream therein or upon any public playground or
school ground; provided, however, that this section shall not
prohibit a person from walking or exercising an animal in a
public park or on any public beach when such animal is on a
leash, tether or chain not to exceed eight (8) feet in length.
This section shall not apply to any blind person using a trained
Seeing Eye dog; to animal shows, exhibitions or organized dog
training classes where at least twenty-four (24) hours' advance
notice has been given to the animal control authority, by such
persons requesting to hold such animal shows, exhibitions or dog
training classes. In the case of potentially dangerous dogs as
defined and regulated in section 8.03.030 and sections 8.03.220
through 8.03.250, the provisions of sections 8.03.220 through
8.03.250 shall apply to the leashing, muzzling, and restraint of
such animals in public.
M
5. Any animal which enters any place where food is
I
',stored, prepared, served or sold to the public or any other
.'public building or hall. However, this section shall not apply to
any blind person using a trained Seeing Eye dog; to veterinary
offices or hospitals, or to animal shows, exhibitions or
organized dog-training classes where at least twenty-four (24)
hours' advance notice has been given to the animal control
authority, but such persons requesting to hold such animal shows,
exhibitions or dog-training classes.
6. A female domesticated animal whether licensed or
not, while in heat, accessible to other animals for purposes
other than controlled and planned breeding.
7. Any domesticated animal which chases, runs after,
or jumps at vehicles using the public streets and alleys.
8. Any domesticated animal which habitually snaps,
growls, snarls, jumps upon or otherwise threatens persons
lawfully using the public sidewalks, streets, alleys, or other
public ways.
9. Any animal, other than a dangerous dog or
potentially dangerous dog as defined by RCW 16.08.070 which has
exhibited vicious propensities and which constitutes a danger to
the safety of persons or property off his premises or lawfully on
his premises.
10. A vicious animal or animal with vicious
propensities, other than a dangerous dog or potentially dangerous
dog as defined by RCW 16.08.070, which runs at large at any time,
or which is off the owner's premises not securely leashed and in
the control of a person of suitable age and discretion to control
or restrain such animal.
21
Ii
11. Any domesticated animal which howls, yelps,
(whines, barks, or makes other oral noises, in such a manner as to
disturb any person or neighborhood to an unreasonable degree.
12. Any domesticated animal which enters upon another
person's property without the permission of that person.
13. Animals staked, tethered, or kept on public
,property without prior written consent of the county animal
control authority.
14. Animals on any public property not under control
by the owner or other competent person.
15. Animals kept, harbored, or maintained and known to
have a contagious disease unless under the treatment of a
licensed veterinarian;
16. Animals running in packs.
Sec. 8.03.220. Dangerous and potentially dangerous dogs --Defined➢'
ownership requirements.
A. Definitions. The following words, terms and
phrases, when used in this chapter, shall have the meanings
ascribed to them in this section, except where the context
clearly indicates a different meaning:
Animal control authority means an entity acting
alone or in concert with other local governmental units for
enforcement of the animal control laws of the city, county, and
state and the shelter and welfare of animals.
Animal control officer means any individual
employed, contracted with, or appointed by the animal control
authority for the purpose of aiding in the enforcement of this
chapter or any other law or ordinance relating to the licensure
of animals, control of animals, or seizure and impoundment of
animals, and includes any state or local law enforcement officer
22
i
or other employee who duties in whole or in part include
!assignments that involve the seizure and impoundment of any
animal.
Dangerous dog means any dog that according to the
records of the appropriate authority:
1. Has inflicted severe injury on a human being
without provocation on public or private property;
2. Has killed a domestic animal without
provocation while off the owner's property; or
3. Has been previously found to be potentially
dangerous, the owner having received notice of such and the dog
again aggressively bites, attacks, or endangers the safety of
humans or domestic animals.
Owner means any person, firm, corporation,
organization, or department possessing, harboring, keeping,
having an interest in, or having control or custody of an animal.
Potentially dangerous dog means any dog that when
unprovoked:
1. Inflicts bites on a human or a domestic
animal either on public or private property; or
2. Chases or approaches a person upon the
streets, sidewalks, or any public grounds in a menacing fashion
or apparent attitude of attack, or any dog with a known
propensity, tendency, or disposition to attack unprovoked, or to
cause injury or -otherwise to threaten the safety of humans or
domestic animals.
Prober enclosure of a dangerous doq means, while
on the owner's property, a dangerous dog shall be securely
confined indoors or in a securely enclosed and locked pen or
structure, suitable to prevent the entry of young children and
designed to prevent the animal from escaping. Such pen or
23
lstructure shall have secure sides and a secure top, and shall
i
'also provide protection from the elements for the dog.
Severe injury means any physical injury that
results in broken bones or disfiguring lacerations requiring
multiple sutures or cosmetic surgery.
B. Ownership requirements.
1. It is unlawful for an owner to have a
dangerous dog in the city without a certificate of registration
issued under this section. Sections 8.03.220 through 8.03.250
shall not apply to dogs used by law enforcement official for
police work.
2. The animal control authority of the city
shall issue a certificate of registration to the owner of a
dangerous dog if the owner presents to the animal control unit
sufficient evidence of:
a. A proper enclosure to confine a dangerous dog
and the posting of the premises with a clearly visible warning
sign that there is a dangerous dog on the property. In addition,
the owner shall conspicuously display a sign with a warning
symbol that informs children of the presence of a dangerous dog;
b. A surety bond issued by a surety insurer
qualified under RCW ch. 48.28 in a form acceptable to the animal
control authority in the sum of at least fifty thousand dollars
($50,000.00), payable to any person injured by the vicious dog;
or
C. A policy of liability insurance, such as
homeowner's insurance, issued by an insurer qualified under RCW
Title 48 in the amount of at least fifty thousand dollars
($50,000.00), insuring the owner for any personal injuries
inflicted by the dangerous dog.
24
!Sec. 8.03.230. fie --Registration, fee.
ji A. The owner of a dangerous dog or potentially
dangerous dog shall obtain a certificate of registration from the
city's animal control authority.
B. An annual fee in the amount of one hundred dollars
($100.00) shall be paid by an owner of a dangerous or potentially
dangerous dog to the animal control authority upon application to
register dangerous dogs. The payment of this annual license fee
to the county treasurer is in addition to regular dog licensing
fees.
Sec. 8.03.240. SimeUnlawful activities.
A. It is unlawful for an owner of a dangerous or
potentially dangerous dog to permit the dog to be outside the
proper enclosure unless the dog is muzzled and restrained by a
substantial chain or leash and under the physical restraint of a
responsible person. The muzzle shall be made in a manner that
will not cause injury to the dog or interfere with its vision or
respiration but shall prevent it from biting any person or
animal.
B. Dogs shall not be declared dangerous if the
threat, injury, or damage was sustained by a person who, at the
time, was committing a wilful trespass or other tort upon the
premises occupied by the owner of the dog, or was tormenting,
abusing, or assaulting the dog or has, in the past, been observed
or reported to have tormented, abused, or assaulted the dog or
was committing or attempting to commit a crime.
Sec. 8.03.250. Same -confiscation and penalties.
A. Any dangerous dog shall be immediately confiscated
by the animal control authority if:
25
1, The dog is not validly registered under
;section 8.03.220-
2. The owner does not secure the liability
'insurance coverage required under section 8.03.220•
3, The dog is not maintained in the proper
enclosure.
4. The dog is outside of the dwelling of the
owner, or outside of the proper enclosure and not under physical
restraint of the responsible person.
B. In addition to the above, the owner shall be
guilty of a gross misdemeanor punishable in accordance with RCW
9A.20.021.
C. If a dangerous dog of an owner with a prior
conviction under this chapter attacks or bites a person or
another domestic animal, the dangerous dog shall be immediately
confiscated by the animal control authority, placed in quarantines'
for the proper length of time, and thereafter destroyed in an
expeditious and humane manner.
Sec. 8.03.260. Unlawful acts against police department
dogs --Penalty for violation.
A. No person shall wilfully torment, torture, beat,
kick, strike or harass any dog used by a police department for
police work, or otherwise interfere with the use of any such dog
for police work by such department or its officers or members.
B. Any person who violates subsection A. of this
section shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, punishable by
not more than ninety (90) days in jail or not more than a fine of
two hundred fifty dollars ($250.00), or both.
26
Sec. 8.03.270. Cruelty to animals --Unlawful acts designated.
It is unlawful for any person to:
1. Wilfully and cruelly injure or kill any animal by
any means causing it fright or pain.
2. By reason of neglect or intent to cause or allow
any animal to endure pain, suffering or injury or to fail or
neglect to aid or attempt alleviation of pain, suffering or
injury he has so caused to any animal.
3. Lay out or expose any kind of poison, or to leave
exposed any poison food or drink for man, animal or fowl, or any
substance or fluid whatever whereon or wherein there is or shall
be deposited or mingled, any kind of poison or poisonous or
deadly substance or fluid whatever, on any premises, or in any
unenclosed place or to aid or abet any person in so doing, unless
in accordance with the provisions of RCW 16.52.190.
4. Abandon any domestic animal by dropping off or
leaving such animal on the street, road or highway, or in any
other public place, or on the private property of another.
Sec. 8.03.280. poisonous reptiles, poisonous snakes and
constrictor snakes.
A. It shall be unlawful to keep or harbor any
poisonous reptile, poisonous snake or constrictor snake, other
than constrictor snakes under ten (10) feet in length, within the
city.
B. All constrictor snakes legally allowed within the
city must be kept or harbored in a secure, locked cage when left
unattended.
C. This section shall not apply to zoological parks,
performing animal exhibitions, circuses or pet shops licensed by
the city. Pet shops within the city choosing to sell constrictor
27
I
jsnakes allowed under this section must plainly post in a
'conspicuous place the following notice:
,It is illegal to keep or harbor constrictor snakes
over ten (10) feet in length within the City of Kent. Any person
who legally keeps or harbors constrictor snakes within the City
of Kent MUST keep the snake(s) in a secure, locked cage when left
unattended." other
D. In addition to or as an alternate to any
penalty provided in this chapter or by law, any person violating
this section shall incur a civil penalty. The penalty for the
first notice of violation shall be one hundred dollars ($100.00).
The penalty for the second notice of violation in any one-year
period is three hundred dollars ($300.00). The penalty for each
successive violation in any one-year period is five hundred
dollars ($500.00). _.
Sec. 8.03.290. Enforcement power.
A. The animal control authority is authorized to take
such lawful action as may be required to enforce the provisions
of this chapter and the laws of the state as they pertain to
animal cruelty, shelter, welfare and enforcement of control,
including regulation of dangerous and potentially dangerous dogs.
B. The animal control authority shall not enter
property or a building or residence designated for and used for
private purposes, unless a proper warrant has first been issued
upon a showing that the officer has reasonable cause to believe
an animal is being maintained in the building in violation of
this chapter; provided, however, that the animal control
authority, while pursuing or observing any animal in violation of
this chapter, may enter upon any public or private property,
except any building designated for and used for private purposes,
i
for the purpose of abating the animal violation being pursued or
observed.
C. No person shall deny, prevent, obstruct or attempt
Ito deny, prevent or obstruct an officer from pursuing any animal
observed to be in violation of this chapter. Further, no person
shall fail or neglect, after a proper warrant has been presented,
to promptly permit the animal control authority to enter private
property to perform any duty imposed by this chapter. Any person
violating this subsection is guilty of a misdemeanor.
D. The foregoing provisions of this section are in
addition to authorities and penalties relating to dangerous or
potentially dangerous dogs as provided in sections 8.03.220
through 8.03.250.
Sec. 8.03.300. Violations.
A. Violations deemed nuisance abatement. All
violations of this chapter are detrimental to the public health,
safety, and welfare and are public nuisances. All conditions
which are determined after review by the director to be in
violation of this chapter shall be abated.
B. Violations misdemeanor, -penalty_ Except as to the
regulation of dangerous and potentially dangerous dogs under
sections 8.03.220 through 8.03.250, any person who allows an
animal to be maintained in violation of this chapter is guilty of
a misdemeanor punishable by fine of not more than two hundred
fifty dollars ($250.00) and/or imprisonment for a term not to
exceed ninety (90) days.
C. Violations civil -penalty. Except as to the
regulation of dangerous and potentially dangerous dogs under
sections 8.03.220 through 8.03.250, any person whose animal is
maintained in violation of this chapter shall incur a civil
M
(penalty plus costs of the animal control authority. The penalty
(for the first notice of violation shall be twenty-five dollars
;($25.00); fifty dollars ($50.00) for the second notice of
violation in any one-year period; and one hundred dollars
($100.00) for each successive violation in any one-year period.
Sec. 8.03.310. Impounding.
A. Authorization. In addition to authorized actions
under sections 8.03.220 through 8.03.250 relating to dangerous
and potentially dangerous dogs, the director and his authorized
representative may apprehend any animals found doing any of the
acts defined as a public nuisance and/or being subjected to cruel
treatment as defined by law.
B. Notification of owners. Except as to dangerous or
potentially dangerous dogs as provided in sections 8.03.220
through 8.03.250, after any animals are apprehended, the animal
control authority shall ascertain whether they are licensed or
otherwise identifiable and, if reasonably possible, return the
animal to the owner together with a notice of violations of this
chapter. If it is not reasonably possible to immediately return
the animals to their owners, the animal control authority shall
}
notify the owners within a reasonable time by efie�d regular
mail or telephone that the animal has been impounded and may be
redeemed. Except as to dangerous or potentially dangerous dogs as
provided in sections 8.03.220 through 8.03.250, a -n any currently
licensed animal impounded pursuant to this chapter shall be held
for the owner at least one hundred twenty hours (120), after
telephone contact by the impounding agency or for at least two
weeks after posting of the notification of impoundment by regular
mail; any other animal impounded pursuant to this chapter shall
be held for the owner at least seventy-two (72) hours,--a=��S
30
the jmpeundin�eney- from the time of impoundment. The animal
control authority shall not sell any animals to research
institutes or licensed dealers for research purposes.
G. sale } liepnsed a , rs resear
,a } , }•}
anifaal
shall be held fer an additienal ene hundred twenty
tieve the required sevseventy-}we /�72, heurs t d.
ever and
it is t h l f t an±mal
eentrel divisien } faeniter
he,drs prier te the sale ef the animal a researeh institute.—
Any ewffe-r-��edeefn an animal in the study ef a lieensed dealer
fees pajEl by--t-k��Ieensed dealer, and the sale af the ani
} }ive ridle, set Iche -
Elivislen whieh shall, by
firstit,crtes , eentrel diyisien shall,
by a }v
rule
,' a- } ll } h l
ers
institutes at a rate in emeess of that paid
institutes hasing animals .7 , },frem
}
by h
}1, anifaal eentrel
31
E. Injured or diseased animals. Except as to
it dangerous or potentially dangerous dogs as provided in sections
8.03.220 through 8.03.250, any animal suffering from serious
4 injury or disease may be humanely destroyed, or, in the
discretion of the impounding authority, may be held for a longer
period and redeemed by any person on payment of charges not
exceeding those prescribed herein.
Sec. 8.03.320. Euthanasia, sale, or adoption of animals not
redeemed; prohibitions.
A. Except as to dangerous or potentially dangerous
dogs as provided in sections 8.03.220 through 8.03.250, any
animal not redeemed shall be treated in one (1) of the following
ways as follows:
1. Humanely destroyed by euthanasia.
dealer l e_'
�. a l a L xr^cci " r a
T4.S.G. 2 l 7 l }e dealer shall eefaply-����
r
• h a Frem h -} L. l l
a= T l r
be seld }
r
T L. } .......
Ameriean
Lien F T a'} }8f-1 T 7 n
er } state
b. T l ls-pQL I IQ
rem the-He6u-F�
ti, a l l Is a } F' , , y r
32
33
OW
33
I 4—. 2. Made available for adoption. Except as to
dangerous or potentially dangerous dogs as provided in sections
18.03.220 through 8.03.250, the owner of any animal impounded
!pursuant to the provisions contained in this chapter may recover
such animal or animals when all billable costs, redemption fees,
penalties, and boarding costs incurred in such impoundment have
been paid to the county comptroller, which payment may be
accepted by the animal control authority acting as agent for the
county.
a. All dogs and cats over the age of six
months adopted from the King County animal shelter shall be
spayed and neutered prior to adoption A spay/neuter deposit
shall be charged for dogs and cats under the age of six months
which are too young to be spayed/neutered prior to adoption.
Failure to spay/neuter such dog or cat is a violation of this
chapter and a breach of the adoption contract and will result in""
the forfeiture of the adoption and return of the dog or cat to
King County animal control for the required spay/neutering.
B. No licensed animal shall be made available for
research unless written permission is received from the animal's
owners. Further, no animal conveyed to the division by its owner
shall be made available for research without written permission
unless and until all reasonable efforts to locate the owner have
failed.
The adyisery beard €er the sale e€ anifftals, p'_ - - ieus y
34
i
iing animalsshall ha;,Fe the autherhen it has feund that--aiIY-9`UI6Lh
Sec. 8.03.340. Same --Reports and records available for public
inspection.
B. All records required to be filed pursuant to this
chapter shall also be public and shall be available for
inspection by any interested person at any reasonable time during
normal county working hours.
Sec. 8.03.350. Additional enforcement.
Notwithstanding the existence or use of any other
remedy, the director may seek legal or equitable relief to enjoin
acts or practices and abate any conditions which constitute a
violation of this chapter or other regulations herein adopted.
Sec. 8.03.360. Violations; notice and order.
Subject to the provisions of sections 8.03.220 through
8.03.250 relating to dangerous or potentially dangerous dogs:
1. Whenever the director or authorized animal control
officer has found an animal maintained in violation of this
35
�Ichapter, the director of the animal control authority shall
commence proceedings to cause the abatement of each violation.
2. The director or authorized animal control officer
shall issue a notice and order directed to the owner or the
person presumed to be the owner of the animal maintained in
notice and order shall contain:
violation of this chapter. The
a. The name and address, if known, of the owner
or person presumed to be the owner of the animal in violation of
this chapter.
b. The license number, if available, and
description of the animal in violation sufficient for
identification.
C. A statement that the director or authorized
animal control officer has found the animal maintained illegally
together with a brief and concise description of the conditions
found to render the animal in violation of this chapter.
d. A statement of the action required to be
taken if the director of the animal control authority has
determined the following: an order
(1) if abatement is necessary,
shall require the abatement and such abatement shall be completed
within a certain time from the date of the order, as determined
by the director to be reasonable.
ivil penalty should be assessed,
(2) That a c
the order shall require that the penalty shall be paid within
fourteen (14) days from the date of the order. fired
e. Statements advising that if any re
abatement is not commenced within the time specified, the
director of the animal control authority will proceed to cause
abatement and charge the costs thereof against the owner.
f. Statements advising:
36
(1) That a person having a legal interest in
i
the animal may appeal from the notice and order or any action of
the director of the animal control authority to the board of
appeals, provided the appeal is made in writing as provided by
;this chapter, and filed with the director of the animal control
authority within fourteen (14) days from the date of service of
such notice and order; and
(2) That failure to appeal will constitute a
waiver of all rights to an administrative hearing and
determination of the matter.
3. The notice and order shall be served on the owner
or presumed owner of the animal in violation.
4. Service of the notice and order shall be made upon
all persons entitled thereto either personally or by mailing a
copy of such notice and order by certified mail, postage prepaid,
return receipt requested, to the person at his address as it
appears on the last equalized assessment roll of the county.
5. Proof of personal service of the notice and order
shall be made at the time of service by a written declaration
under penalty of perjury executed by the person effecting
service, declaring the time, date and manner in which service was
made.
6. The standards of this chapter shall be followed by
the director of the animal control authority in determining the
existence of an animal control violation and in determining the
abatement action required. The provisions of this section, do not
apply to actions by the authority or proceedings before the
director relating to dangerous dogs or potentially dangerous
dogs. Sections 8.03.220 through 8.03.250 shall apply to all
actions and procedures for dealing with dangerous dogs or
37
potentially dangerous dogs, including regulations promulgated
thereunder by the director.
Sec. 8.03.370. Appeals.
Subject to the procedures and requirements of sections
8.03.220 through 8.03.250 relating to dangerous or potentially
;dangerous dogs:
1. Appeals. The King County board of appeals, as
established by article 7 of the King County Code, is designated
to hear appeals by parties aggrieved by actions of the director
of the animal control authority pursuant to this chapter. The
board may adopt reasonable rules or regulations for conducting
its business. Copies of all rules and regulations adopted by the
board shall be delivered to the director of the animal control
authority who shall make them freely accessible to the public.
All decisions and findings of the board shall be rendered to the
applicant in writing with a copy to the director of the animal
control authority.
2. Form of appeal. Any person entitled to service
under section 8.03.360 may appeal from any notice and order or
any action of the director of the animal control authority under
this chapter by filing at the office of the director of the
animal control authority within fourteen (14) days from the date
of the service of such order, a written appeal containing:
a. A heading containing the words: "Before the
board of appeals of the County of King."
b. A caption reading: "Appeal of
"
giving the names of all appellants participating in the appeal.
C. A brief statement setting forth the legal
interest of each of the appellants of the animal involved in the
notice and order.
M
1Id. A brief statement in concise language of the
specific order or action protested, together with any material
facts claimed to support the contentions of the appellant.
e. A brief statement in concise language of the
relief sought, and the reasons why it is claimed the protested
order or action should be reversed, modified, or otherwise set
aside.
f. The signatures of all parties named as
appellants, and their official mailing addresses.
g. The verification (by declaration under
penalty of perjury) of at least one (1) appellant as to the truth
of the matters stated in the appeal.
3. Scheduling and notice of appeal. The board of
appeals shall set a time and place, not more than thirty (30)
days from such notice of appeal for hearing thereon. Written
notice of the time and place of hearing shall be given at least
ten (10) days prior to the date of the hearing to each appellant
by the manager -clerk of the board.
4. Procedures of appeal hearing At the hearing, the
appellant shall be entitled to appear in person and be
represented by counsel and offer such evidence pertinent and
material to the action of the director. Only those matters or
issues specifically raised by the appellant in the written notice
of appeal shall be considered.
5. Failure to appear. Failure of any person to file
an appeal in accordance with this section shall constitute a
waiver of his rights to an administrative hearing.
6. Stay of enforcement during appeal Enforcement of
any notice and order of the director of the animal control
authority issued under this chapter shall be stayed during the
39
pending of an appeal, except impoundment of an animal which is
" vicious or dangerous or cruelly treated.
7. Conflicting differing provisions._ In the event
that procedures for appeals adopted by the board of appeals are
!different than those set forth in this section, the procedures of
the board of appeals shall control. If in the further event any
procedures for appeals adopted by the board of appeals conflict
with the provisions in this section relating to dangerous or
potentially dangerous dogs, the procedures of sections 8.03.220
through 8.03.250 and the implementing regulations of the board of
appeals shall control.
Sec. 8.03.380. Redemption procedures.
A. Any animal impounded pursuant to the provisions of
section 8.03.310 may be redeemed upon payment of the redemption
fee as provided in this section. The redemption fee for dogs and"
cats shall be payable to the county comptroller and shall be an
amount as established by the animal control division, department
of general services, King County, for each such dog or cat, plus
an additional fee of an amount as established by the animal
control division, department of general services, King County,
for each twenty -four-hour period or portion thereof, during which
such dog or cat is retained by the impounding agency.
B. The redemption fee for livestock shall be an
amount as established by the animal control division, department
of general services, King County, per animal. Livestock not
redeemed may be sold at public auction by the impounding agency.
The boarding cost for livestock impounded shall be in accordance
with the rate established by contract between the county and the
given stockyard used for holding such animal.
40
i'
C. The provisions relating to redemption do not apply
�I
to dangerous or potentially dangerous dogs as provided in
sections 8.03.220 through 8.03.250.
Sec. 8.03.390. Nuisances, removal.
A. Any animal constituting a public nuisance as
provided in this chapter shall be abated and removed from the
city by the owner or by the director of the animal control
authority, upon receipt of three (3) notices and orders of
violation by the owner in any one-year period. Where'it is
established by record pursuant to this chapter and no finding was
entered showing that the owner will be able to provide reasonable
restraints to protect the public from repetitions of violations,
the director of the animal control authority shall notify and
direct the owner of the animal to abate the nuisance or remove
the animal from the city within ninety-six (96) hours from the
date of notice. If such animal is found to be within the confines
of the city after ninety-six (96) hours have elapsed from the
date of notice, the nuisance shall be abated and the animal
removed by the director of the animal control authority. Animals
removed pursuant to the provisions of this section shall be
removed from the city or be subjected to euthanasia by the animal
control authority.
B. Any dog or other animal which bites, attacks, or
attempts to bite one (1) or more persons two (2) or more times
within a two-year period is declared to be a public nuisance and
shall not be kept within the city forty-eight (48) hours after
receiving written notice from the director. Such animal found in
violation of this section will be impounded and disposed of as an
unredeemed animal, and the owner or keeper of such animal has no
right to redeem such dog or animal.
41
ISec. 8.03.400. Civil penalty and abatement costs.
A. r;ability of owner. The civil penalty and the cost
`of abatement are also personal obligations of the animal owner.
The prosecuting attorney on behalf of King County may collect the
:civil penalty and the abatement work costs by use of all
appropriate legal remedies.
B. Costs of enforcement action. In addition to costs
and disbursements provided for by statute, the prevailing party
in a collection action under this chapter may, in the court's
discretion, be allowed interest and a reasonable attorney'sfee.
and
The prosecuting attorney shall seek such costs, interest,
reasonable attorney's fees on behalf of King County when the
county is the prevailing party.
Sec. 8.03.410. Supplemental provisions.
The provisions of sections 8.03.390 through 8.03.400,
are in addition to other remedies in sections 8.03.220 through
8.03.250 for purposes of regulating dangerous or potentially
dangerous dogs.
Sec. 8.03.420. Waiver of fees and Penalties.
A. The animal control director has the authority -to
.. _ _...a ,.•oA=mnti
public interest. the
B. In determining whether a waiver should a 1
following elements_
1- The reason the animal was impounded;
42
i
2. The reason of the basis for the violation
land the likelihood the violation will not recur;
3. The total amount of the fees charged as
(compared with the gravity of the violation;
4. The effect on the owner, the animal's welfare
and the animal control section if the fee(s) or penalties are not
waived and no payment is received.
Section 2. Severability. If any section, sentence,
clause or phrase of this ordinance should be held to be invalid
or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such
invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity
or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or
phrase of this ordinance.
Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take
effect and be in force thirty (30) days from and after its
passage, approval and publication as provided by law.
ATTEST:
BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK
JIM WHITE, MAYOR
43
!!APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_`�
RE?GE A. VI H, CITY ATTORNEY
day y of 1994.
APPROVED
day of 1994.
day y of 1994.
I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance
No. passed by the City Council of the City of Kent,
Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the City of Kent as
hereon indicated.
animaL.ord
BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK
44
(SEAL)
Kent City Council Meeting
Date February 15 1994
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: WORKER'S COMPENSATION TRUST ACCOUNT TRANSFER
-1111��
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Adoption of Ordinance No. 3151 amending
Kent City Code Section 3.05 raising the authorized amount in
the City of Kent's Worker's Compensation Bank Account, and
authorizing the Operations Director to transfer monies to the
account.
3. EXHIBITS: Ordinance
4. RECOMMENDED BY: Operations Committee
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT• NO X YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended ✓
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $_ N/A
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 3E
MILLER,MAYENE-/-KENT70/FN-_ HPDesk-print_
s=ject: WORKER'S COMPENSATION CLAIM PROCESSING
Creator: Mayene MILLER / KENT70/FN Dated: 02/10/94 at 1753.
TO: COUNCILMEMBERS
IN A EFFORT TO STEAMLINE OUR WORKERS'S COMPENSATION CLAIMS PROCESSING,
KEN CHATWIN OUR RISK MANAGER HAS SUGGESTED SEVERAL IMPROVEMENTS TO OUR
PROCESS. THE PRIMARY CHANGE INVOLVES HAVING SCOTT WETZEL, OUR THIRD PARTY
ADMINISTRATOR ASSUME FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR CLAIMS PROCESSING. THERE IS NO
ADDITIONAL COST SINCE THIS RESPONSIBILITY IS ALREADY INCLUDED IN OUR CONTRACT.
THIS ADDITIONAL CONTRACT ACCOUNTABILITY WILL SAVE ERRORS, STAFF TIME AND POSTAGE
COSTS.
AS RECOMMENDED BY THE OPERATIONS COMMITTEE FEBRUARY 9 , 1994, WE ARE REQUESTING
AN AMENDEMENT TO THE WORKER'S COMPENSATION ORDINANCE ALLOWING AN INCREASE IN THE
CASH BALANCE FROM $2,000 TO $20,000. THIS WILL IMPROVE OUR PROCESS AND ACCOMO-
DATE THE TIME LAPSE INVOLVED IN WIRE TRANSFERS AND VALID FUND REIMBURSEMENT.
KEN AND THE OTHER STAFF INVOLVED ARE TO BE COMMENDED FOR THIS SUGGESTION TO
IMPROVE OUR PROCESS.
,FATWIN,KEN / KENT70/PR - HPDesk print.
lessage. Dated: 09/22/93 at 0927.
Subject: Workers Compensation Claim Handling
Sender: Ken CHATWIN / KENT70/PR Contents: 2.
?art 1.
,ROM: Ken CHATWIN / KENT70/PR
TO: Tony MCCARTHY / KENT70/AD
Mayene MILLER / KENT70/FN
CC: Brigitte HOOPES / KENT70/FN
Laurie MURRAY / KENT70/FN
Don OLSON / KENT70/PR
Part 2.
Tony: Follow-up to my memo of 4-1-93 to streamline handling and staff
time procedures on claims handling, copy attached.
Proposal is outlined below, what we were doing and how we propose to revise.
Scott Wetzel
Workers Compensation Claim Handling
Clerical and Staff Handling
What We Were Doing How We Propose to Revise
1. Involves staff time cost and loss '
1. No actual $ cost savings under the
of efficiency but has no $ cost
contract, just transfers functions
effect to the contract itself
to Scott Wetzel that we were paying
'
for yet performing with city staff
2. Staff time that can be saved:
2. Staff time savings ''s efficiency
A. Cover letter to employees, city
and cost savings.
staff prepares, types and mails =
A. Function Scott Wetzel normally
loss of staff time and postage.
prepares and mails for all other
'
clients at same contract price='s
'
time and postage savings
B. Verification of lost wages, sick I
B. Allow Scott Wetzel to contact
time, rate of pay is time handled '
time keeper direct per attachment
by phone through Human Resources. '
n2 list, cut out at least 2 phone
Time spent answering, taking info. '
call steps by Human Resource
placing call to dept. time keeper, '
personnel ='s time savings and
developing info. or leaving call I
efficiency gain.
back then developing info., then '
returning call to Scott Wetzel if '
able to get thru ist time. '
C. Zero blance banking staff time '
C. Pre -fund account at.normal 1/2
requirements of Human Resources & I
month activity level, have Sco+-t
Finance Dept. This mandates delay '
Wetzel mail all checks direct
in payment to medical providers, '
with cover letters, incorporat-
requires special handling and I
ing the newly designed and word -
batching of mail by Scott Wetzel, I
ed "Sorry you were hurt letter",
duplicates postage cost in mailing
all checks to Human Resources for
cover letter preparation and
preparation of Fund Transfer sheet '
for Finance personnel to handle '
.,and fund the account. Requires '
staff time and expenses on the part'
of both Human Resources and Finance'
to handle in this manner for which '
we are already paying in the cost '
of the contract for Scott Wetzel to/
handle.
Thanks, Ken Chatwin
Attachment #3. Scott Wetzel
then prepares and delivers the
check run to Finance with info.
for sick leave reimbursement
through the newly designed "Time
Loss Payroll Notice" Attachment
#4. Savings in postage, staff
time, and efficiencies will more
than off set investment income
loss on pre -funding amount.
Check run will automatically
establish funding amount to be
deposited for next 1/2 month
activity.
j
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Kent,
Washington, amending Kent City Code
Chapter 3.05 raising the authorized
amount in the City of Kent Worker's
Compensation Bank Account, and authoriz-
ing the Operations Director to transfer
monies to the Account.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON DOES
HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Chapter 3.05 of the Kent City Code is hereby
amended to read as follows:
3.05.010 CREATED.
There is hereby established in the office of the
((wee)) operations director a special account to be known as
the worker's compensation bank account.
3.05.020 AMOUNT AND AUTHORIZATION.
The amount of the Account shall be ((tFte)) twenty
thousand dollars ($20,000.00). The Operations Director or his
designate is hereby authorized to ((issQe a eheeie—in that
Wit)) transfer((r4iiq)) funds from the general account to the
Worker's Compensation Bank Account.
3.05.030 APPLICATION FOR USE.
The funds of this account shall be for the use of the
City of Kent for payment of City of Kent Worker's Compensation
claims. Application for payment out of this account shall be
Ii
submitted to the Operations Director or his designate for
approval. The Operations Director or Finance Manager, is
authorized to (('
. , ek--�e) ) reimburse funds to the Worker's
Compensation Bank Account from the Worker's Compensation Fund in
amounts necessary to cover all approved payments for Worker's
Compensation claims.
Section 2. Any account consistent with the authority
and prior to the effective date of this ordinance is hereby
ratified and confirmed.
Section 3. Severability. Should any section,
subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this chapter
be declared unconstitutional or invalid for any reason, such
decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion
of this chapter.
Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take
effect and be in force thirty (30) days from and after its
passage, approval and publication as provided by law.
JIM WHITE, MAYOR
ATTEST:
BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ROGER A. LUBOVICH, CITY ATTORNEY
PASSED the day of , 1994
APPROVED the day of 1994
PUBLISHED the day of , 1994
I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance
No. , passed by the City Council of the City of Kent,
Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the City of Kent as
hereon indicated.
BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK (SEAL)
wrkrscom.ord
I
Kent City Council Meeting
Date February 15, 1994
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: GREEN RIVER TRAIL FENCE PROJECT
2. IIMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Parks Co t
uthorization to accept as complete the Green River Trail Fence
project and to release r tainage to Quality Fence Builders upon
receipt of State releases The project was completed within
budget.
3. EXHIBITS: Parks Committee minutes
4. RECOMMENDED BY:
approval 3-0)
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO ✓ YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
2V
7.
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 3F
Parks Ccamittee Minutes
February 8, 1994
3
Councilmember Bennett moved to authorize staff to take acceptance of these
projects directly to Council as soon as punch list items have been completed.
Councilmember Mann seconded. The motion passed unanimously.
It was discussed at the agenda meeting that once projects are accepted and the
project is within budget, these items will not come to Parks Committee anymore
but will be taken directly to Council as a Consent Calendar item.
RIVERBEND GOLF COMPLEX DIRECTOR'S REPORT
Keith Sanden reported that preliminary reports from Finance reveal that January
revenues were up the largest in history. He said that the new Golf Course
Superintendent, Pete Petersen, is very knowledgeable and very refreshing to work
with. SSMD is working on a long range plan for complex improvements to update
the complex's image. Mr. Sanden reported that a new driving range will be
opening soon which will give the City some competition.
Repairs to the back fence at the driving range have been completed. Customer
credit files and inventory are now on the computer which will hopefully expedite
customer service. All tournaments for Men's and Women's Clubs have been set up
for the year. The golf course will sponsor a major tournament scheduled for July
31. More details will be provided at a later date.
Councilmember Mann inquired if there is anything planned for the mini putt. Mr.
Sanden said that the preliminary plan is to leave the existing mini putt in place
and build an 18 hole in the grassy area not being used. He said this project
would be his first priority because it is the most visible, would create more
goodwill and exposure, and requires less money and time to complete.
GREEN RIVER TRAIL FENCE PROJECT ACCEPTANCE
Councilmember Bennett moved to accept the Green River Trail Fence Project as
complete. Councilmember Mann seconded. The motion passed unanimously.
INTERURBAN TRAIL BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ACCEPTANCE
Councilmember Bennett moved to accept the Interurban Trail Bridge Replacement
Project as complete. Councilmember Mann seconded. The motion passed
unanimously. Patrice Thorell said that staff will send a thank you letter to
Puget Power for their $42,000 donation which paid for half of the project. Jack
Ball complimented the construction company who did the work, Coluccio
Construction Company. The company did a nice job, and completed the project on
time and within budget.
CHANGE IN MEETING TIME
The Parks Committee will meet the first Tuesday of each month at 4:30 p.m.
Kent City Council Meeting
UUU"' Date February 15, 1994
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: INTERURBAN TRAIL BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT
p-P-�INCE
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: �, A`recommended by the Parks Committee
uthorization to accept as come ttFie- n erur an Trail idge
Replacement project and to release retainage to Frank Coluccio
Construction Company upon receipt of State releases, The /
project was completed within budget. \
3. EXHIBITS: Parks Committee minutes
4. RECOMMENDED BY: Consultant Alpha Engineers; Parks Department; _
and Parks Committee (2/8/94 unanimous approval 3-0
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO ✓ YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REOUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 3G
Parks Committee Minutes
February 8, 1994
M
ACCEPTANCE OF EAST HILL PARK SCENIC HILL PARK, AND GREEN RIVER TRAIL PROJECTS
AS COMPLETE
Councilmember Bennett moved to authorize staff to take acceptance of these
projects directly to Council as soon as punch list items have been completed.
Councilmember Mann seconded. The motion passed unanimously.
It was discussed at the agenda meeting that once projects are accepted and the
project is within budget, these items will not come to Parks Committee anymore
but will be taken directly to Council as a Consent Calendar item.
RIVERBEND GOLF COMPLEX DIRECTOR'S REPORT
Keith Sanden reported that preliminary reports from Finance reveal that January
revenues were up the largest in history. He said that the new Golf Course
Superintendent, Pete Petersen, is very knowledgeable and very refreshing to work
with. SSMD is working on a long range plan for complex improvements to update
the complex's image. Mr. Sanden reported that a new driving range will be
opening soon which will give the City some competition.
Repairs to the back fence at the driving range have been completed. Customer
credit files and inventory are now on the computer which will hopefully expedite
customer service. All tournaments for Men's and Women's Clubs have been set up
for the year. The golf course will sponsor a major tournament scheduled for July
31. More details will be provided at a later date.
Councilmember Mann inquired if there is anything planned for the mini putt. Mr.
Sanden said that the preliminary plan is to leave the existing mini putt in place
and build an 18 hole in the grassy area not being used. He said this project
would be his first priority because it is the most visible, would create more
goodwill and exposure, and requires less money and time to complete.
GREEN RIVER TRAIL FENCE PROJECT ACCEPTANCE
Councilmember Bennett moved to accept the Green River Trail Fence Project as
complete. Councilmember Mann seconded. The motion passed unanimously.
INTERURBAN TRAIL BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ACCEPTANCE
Councilmember Bennett moved to accept the Interurban Trail Bridge Replacement
Project as complete. Councilmember Mann seconded. The motion passed
unanimously. Patrice Thorell said that staff will send a thank you letter to
Puget Power for their $42,000 donation which paid for half of the project. Jack
Ball complimented the construction company who did the work, Coluccio
Construction Company. The company did a nice job, and completed the project on
time and within budget.
CHANGE IN MEETING TIME
The Parks Committee will meet the first Tuesday of each month at 4:30 p.m.
Kent City Council Meeting
Date February 15, 1994
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: R.V. REST STOP - NADEN AVENUE
&Aoiizo%on ' ----
2. SUMMARY STA MENT: IrAs recommended by the Public Wnrlcs
_9erai*4:t43!e, 44T4erct the Public Works Director to install a
5 -stall R.V parking lot on Naden Avenue, south of Meeker
Street,an from leftover funds
within the James Street 86/87 Overlay fund (Fund #R81)feES-
p�CP�5
-�� C'&
3. EXHIBITS: Public Works minutes, Public Works Director
memorandum and vicinity map
4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended ✓
NN
7.
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED:
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 3H
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
FEBRUARY 2, 1994
TO: PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE
FROM: DON WICKSTROM Dtom''",
RE: R.V.'S REST STOP - NADEN AVENUE
Per Jim Bennett's request, attached is a layout for a 5 stall RV
parking lot on Naden Avenue south of Meeker Street. The total cost
thereof is $13,000.00. As previously discussed, there will be no
water, electrical hook-ups or restroom facilities. We will be
providing 24 hour parking only and signs will be installed
indicating this.
Financing for this project can be taken from the 193 overlay fund
for which adequate leftover funds exist. If Committee wishes to
proceed, then the following action is necessary.
ACTION: Concur with the Public Works Director on the installation
of the 5 RV parking stalls and recommend that Council
directs the Public Works Director to move forward
accordingly.
AVE
N
RH AVE
u
N N
Ln
s
�.
Cc
F p
M MDOD/ORD A .
Nn A
SCENIC
wAr
0.7
T
N
0
L,) ,_..
C) I \D
1ry HILLCREST AVE
1)}
-
i
�
M3nA N CL.A*K
GAVE
m
err y
iw
�
in
t � AVE
A
S
t !
N JASDH
AVE
iv
ANTERC
fw
AVE
n �•�AVE
LLIt'pRA AVE j
J. �
•Ii it%Y"�
i•''�J
wAL OEM r
�•
T
rn
rLx
^^Ai
AT1K
r
NADEN AVENUE
4
%
RA. REST
STOP -
?i
(I qtgxi
N
O
64TH - AVE
C-
RAOER
no�
N
wASHI1
N ✓
M
S
WASMIMaTQN AVE
A
4AE
POO"
AVE
r
Low AN
A
M
16,
i
AVE'
1
M
_
S 3AV HltL
f
b C
N
S 6TH
AVE
•�• z "• ►�
N STH
AVE
STH i',.
AVE
F >' s STH AVE
7
7
s
N !p
iX31
> N
4TH
AVE
C•*
f s
.+T 4TH A
AV
4�
3*0
3RD
A AVE
1 t
N
Fit
AIM'ANIS
�
s
2ND
A�
2 ND
AVE F
N 2ND
_ "z
S
' '
U
A
AVE It
$
IST
AVEAYE
N N
N 1ST
A\
IST AVE -
'!
s 1ST%
�
_
N
LROAD
AVE
S RAILROAD AVE
7
c
[LAI
3 A N
CENTML
AYE
S AVE
a iz
w _
_
•i
�.
Cc
F p
M MDOD/ORD A .
Nn A
SCENIC
wAr
T
L,) ,_..
C) I \D
1ry HILLCREST AVE
M3nA N CL.A*K
GAVE
m
err y
iw
�
in
t � AVE
A
S
t !
N JASDH
AVE
iv
ANTERC
fw
AVE
n �•�AVE
LLIt'pRA AVE j
yl
...
wAL OEM r
�•
rLx
^^Ai
AT1K
NADEN AVENUE
%
RA. REST
STOP -
?i
(I qtgxi
PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE
FEBRUARY 2, 1994
PRESENT: PAUL MANN MAY MILLER
JIM BENNETT LINDA JOHNSON
TIM CLARK MR & MRS RUST
DON WICKSTROM
Signal at Reiten & Jason
Wickstrom stated that we received two bids within the engineer's
estimate and we are recommending award to the low bidder. He
pointed out that this does include traffic control. Wickstrom said
that originally we were looking at just a pedestrian activated
signal but we had to install some controls because of traffic
turning out of Reiten. Regarding the pocket between Canyon Drive
and this intersection, Bennett asked if this signal will still
allow enough flow without the problem of traffic backup on Canyon.
Wickstrom said the two signals are not integrated; this will be a
free flowing signal, according to our traffic staff. Wickstrom
said the signal will be primarily pedestrian operated.
Committee unanimously recommended acceptance of the low bid and
award of the contract to the V Company.
E> R.V. Rest Stop - Naden Avenue
Wickstrom said we are proposing a 5 stall R.V. Rest Stop with
parking only; no facilities available. Wickstrom said the cost for
this installation would be approximately $13,000 noting that we
have funds left over from the overlay project we did on 4th Avenue.
In response to Clark, Wickstrom said this is not anticipated to
become a revenue producer for the City. He said if we did, we
would be competing with KOA and as such, a policy decision would be
appropriate. Wickstrom said the facility would be signed, 1124 Hour
Parking Only" and that would be subject to policing. The
suggestion was made from the audience that a "bulletin board" type
of structure be installed where up -coming- city events could be
posted as well as road directional signs for the R.V. rest stop.
Mann asked if the bulletin board and road signs could be included
in the cost. Wickstrom agreed and said this was something we could
do.
Committee unanimously recommended the installation of the R.V. Rest
Stop on Naden Avenue, with road directional signs and bulletin
board to be included in the construction cost.
(continued)
1. SUBJECT:
Kent City Council Meeting
Date February 15, 1994
Category Consent Calendar
REAPPOINTMENT TO DRINKING DRIVER TASK FORCE
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Confirmation of the Mayor's re-
appointment of Ford Kiene te eent-inkle-seerving-as a member of
the Drinking Driver Task Force. Mr. Kiene's new appointment
will continue to 1/1/97.
3. EXHIBITS: Memorandum from Mayor White
4. RECOMMENDED BY: Mayor White
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO ✓ YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6.
7.
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
econds
Council Agenda
Item No. 3I
MEMORANDUM
TO: JUDY WOODS, CITY COUNCIL PRESIDENT
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: JIM WHITE, MAYok I ;, . `i
DATE: FEBRUARY 9, 1994
SUBJECT: REAPPOINTMENT OF FORD KIENE TO DRINKING DRIVER TASK FORCE
I have recently reappointed Ford Kiene to continue serving as a member of the Kent Drinking Driver
Task Force. Mr. Kiene's new term will continue to 1/1/97-
I submit this for your confirmation.
JW:jb
O Kent City Council Meeting
Date February 15, 1994
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: APPOINTMENT TO CITY TRANSIT ADVISORY BOARD
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Confirmation of the Mayor's appointment
of Theodore E. (Ted) Nixon te--je-rve as a member of the Kent
Transit Advisory Board. Mr. Nixon is a Kent resident and is
interested in Kent's future growth and expansion. He will
replace Jim White, who resigned, and his new appointment will
continue to 4/30/96.
3. EXHIBITS: Memorandum from Mayor White
4. RECOMMENDED BY: Mayor White
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO v"" YES-��
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended ✓
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
econds
Council Agenda
Item No. 3J
MEMORANDUM
TO: JUDY WOODS, CITY COUNCIL PRESIDENT
CITY COUNCIL MBERS
FROM: JIM WHITE, MA��
DATE: FEBRUARY 9, 1994
SUBJECT: APPOINTMENTS TO CITY TRANSIT ADVISORY BOARD
I have recently appointed Theodore E. (Ted) Nixon to serve as a member of the City Transit
Advisory Board. Mr. Nixon is a Kent resident and is interested in Kent's future growth and
expansion. While serving as a Council Member, I served on the Transit Advisory Board, and Mr.
Nixon will replace me. His term will continue until 4/30/96.
I have also appointed City Council Member Jim Bennett to serve as Ex -Officio member of the Board.
I submit this for your confirmation of Mr. Nixon's appointment.
JW.jb
1. SUBJECT:
COUNCIL ABSENCE
Kent City Council Meeting
Date February 15, 1994
Category Consent Calendar
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Approval of a request for an excused
absence from February 11 1994, City Council meeting from
Councilmember Christi Houser I0> $he was unable to attend.
3. EXHIBITS: Memorandum from Councilmember Houser
4. RECOMMENDED BY: Councilmember Houser
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
MR
7.
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 3K
MEMORANDUM
TO: JIM WHITE, MAYOR
CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM: CHRISTI HOUSER, CITY COUNCILMEMBER
DATE: FEBRUARY 10, 1994
SUBJECT: CITY COUNCIL EXCUSED ABSENCE
I would like to request an excused absence from the February 1, 1994 City Council meeting. I was
unable to attend.
Thank you for your consideration.
CH:jb
1. SUBJECT:
J u(Ie5
CAHFr6/HOBBS ANNEXATION
Kent City Council Meeting
Date February 15, 1994
Category Other Business
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: This date has been set for a meeting
with the initiators of the Jones/Hobbs Annexation, an area of
approximately 25 acres located at the northwest corner of 100th
Avenue SE and South 222nd Street. Staff recommends that the
Council accept the 10% annexation petition and geographically
modify the proposed boundaries by extending them to include all
of the rights of way for South 222nd Street and 100th Avenue
SE where they are adjacent to the proposed annexation. In
addition, staff recommends that the Council authorize
circulation of the 60% petition subject to the City's existing
indebtedness.
3.
4.
gn
Cil
EXHIBITS: Staff report, vicinity map and notification of
intention to commence
RECOMMENDED BY: Staff
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT• NO YES t✓
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended ✓ Not Recommended
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED:
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember_ L -VV moves, Councilmember seconds
accept the 10% annexation petition and geographically modify
the proposed boundaries by extending them to include all of the
rights of way for South 222nd Street and 100th Avenue SE where
they are adjacent to the proposed annexation, and to authorize
circulation of the 60% petition subject to the City's existing
indebtedness.
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 4A
CITY of LE1
CITY OF KENT
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
(206) 859-3390
MEMORANDUM
February 91 1994
MEMO TO: MAYOR JIM WHITE AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: JAMES P. HARRIS, PLANNING DIRECTOR
ION: NOTICE OF INTENTION TO
SUBJECT: JONES/HOCOMMENCE BANN ANNEXABS TION PROCEEDINGS FROM OWNER OF NOT
LESS THAN 10% IN VALUE OF PROPERTY ADJACENT TO KENT
(AN -94-1)
MEETING DATE: TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 15, 1994, 7:00 P.M. AT KENT CITY
HALL IN CHAMBERS WEST
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Council accept the 10% annexation
petition and geographically modify the proposed boundaries by
extending them to include all of the rights-of-way for South
222nd Street and 100th Avenue S.E. where they are adjacent to
the proposed annexation. In addition, staff recommends that
the Council authorize circulation of the 60% petition subject
to the City's existing indebtedness.
I. Names of Aptilicant
Wayne Jones, President
Lakeridge Development
P.O. Box 146
Renton, WA 98057
II. Location
The proposed annexation is
northeast boundary lying north
and west of 100th Avenue S.E.
III. Size of Proposed Annexation
25 Acres
located adjacent to Kent's
of South 222nd Street (extended)
(see attached map).
JONES/HOBBS ANNEXATION (AN -94-1)
FEBRUARY 9, 1994
PAGE 2
IV. Background Information
This proposed annexation lies easterly and adjacent to the
recently annexed Everson area. The northern 5 plus acres lies
within Garrison Creek and the steep slopes that are adjacent
to the creek. The westerly 1/2 of the area, south of the
Garrison Creek area, has slopes of approximately 15%.
There are approximately eight dwellings and 9 lots in the
annexation area. Garrison Creek Park lies immediately to the
west.
V. County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning
The County's recently adopted Soos Creek Plan designates the
Jones/Hobbs annexation area as single family residential with
a density of 1 to 8 dwelling units per acre.
The Scos Creek implementing zoning designates this area as
GR -5, Growth Reserve with a minimum of 1 dwelling unit per 5
acres. This zoning designation is temporary and will
automatically revert to RS 7200, 1 dwelling unit per 7,200
square feet, on December 31, 1994.
VI. Kent's East Hill Plan and Zoning
Kent's East Hill Plan covers this area and anticipates
development of 4 to 6 dwelling units per acre.
Kent's zoning for the area westerly of the proposed annexation
is R1-20, single family residential, 1 dwelling unit per 1/2
acre. The Jones/Hobbs annexation will have an interim zoning
of R1-20 upon annexation; final zoning will be applied within
6 months of annexation.
VII. Impacts to City Operations
All City departments were contacted concerning this proposed
annexation. The Fire Department feels that as long as
sufficient funds are committed to the ongoing delivery of
service there should be no significant impact as long as
properties are utilized as they are currently being used.
The Public Works Department states that the ongoing operations
and maintenance service to the annexation area are minimal.
JONES/HOBBS ANNEXATION (AN -94-1)
FEBRUARY 9, 1994
PAGE 3
VIII.Financial Information
Financial information will be distributed at the City Council
meeting.
VIII.City Annexation Policies
In 1987 the City Council adopted policies that deal with
annexations (Resolution 1150). A review of those policies
indicates that the Jones/Hobbs annexation satisfies their
intent.
JP:JONESHOB.ANX
JONES/HOBBS ANNEXATION
11 y B�Zr
i M CitBoundary
�
City -i
IL'Sri% c,
ill ��;°1i�/?'����_��I�iil�\�,L ,ri l�_-�IA� � � �{,�dl( v M��� IL •��.?
N
U11�." .� \—` '1 ` \ 'Itt�t County `l
Ili \�y 1,\ \\ ` �v �I, }�,
1\ � •`�
Site of Annexation
t \ I I
44
�•\\`�G\��7�'a:i�i�l'\�All
'/l��. i�-,\``t [I. 11 I}\`\�!` ° .�� �',.•�f�\�C.:�Ir /1���1�1 I 1
�\ Cit Boundary.,���r�
County
6'�11-
?iII'�1�ii
k1.
71
����A`�A� A\��Ay�a�A �AV AI�� I �A \ �• I�� �11��( IJ�� 1 ���� ��
I
JONES/ r
N
f " D MAIL TO:
Ll LI SAM _ 3 �gy4 city of Kent
Property Management
CITY OF KENT 220 4th Avenue South
CITY CLERK Kent, WA 98032
Attn: Jerry McCaughan
NOTICE OF INTENTION TO COMMENCE
ANNEXATION PROCEEDINGS
NAME OF PETITIONER:
TO: THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON
We, the undersigned, constituting the owners of not less than
10% in value, according to the assessed valuation for general
taxation of the property contiguous to the City of Kent for which
annexation is to be petitioned do herety notify you Of our
intention to commence annexation proceedings seeking the annexation
of the following described property to the City of Kent, by
circulating a petition therefore among the property owners of said
area.
The territory proposed to be anne,:ed is within King Ccunty,
Washington, and described as follows:
17 i.
</_I c� ,C/!
C��s' •S� �i�- .�CLCC✓ / �Olc7'�b L Z'", f'�
ABOVE OR ATTACHED DESCRIPTION
NOT TO BE USED FOR LEGAL OR ORDINANCE PURPOSES
WHEREFORE, these initiating parties respectfully request the
Honorable Council to set a date for a meeting with these initiat_nc
parties within 60 days from the date of filing this notice to
determine whether the City of Kent will accept the prcrosed
annexation, and whether it shall require the assumption of existing
City indebtedness by the area to be annexed.
14592
PRINT NAME & ADDRESS IN INK LEGAL DESCRIPTION
SIGN WITIl PROPER SIGNATURE Cl OF KE&TT, BLOCK & PLAT OR TAX LOT
CI CLERK
t�.DI
/Z t F", /6�
i
1
1
1
I • ('' III •nr, .•r (i �' I..' - � / ,fes // � •.•• \ • 'r 11
1:��..� fff-,j.. if-- Ir .. F r 1!.•sr b.1 �./`•(( ... •.. I�il '. •n•• a]
1 ) ,
f < V
" JAN — 3 1994 <
� �W-1 a.sonl Q29.-
CIN OF KENT
CLERK
n ; CITY \)
' I
IN
s
o r
2%
IF
I � \
I�_J_f. 1, • •r..
II 1
o ----- 1 >> ( 39
-- ...—.4 Q.
I.I 1 i
.5E 7-22-5
E 8.-23
\\ I � ,I /� • Ips" I — ''r � I` r��J i
- .......... J-
/' ..'��II{�]\\ ' .�� .•/.\.�''ry-�•, /'•�t, Y�� _ISI ly
dAIE 11/01/93
YE Lu
3 iS54
CITY OF KENT
City of KENT
CLERK
TIME 10:24
DELTA FILE SUMMARY REPORT
TopeDt Sectn
Parcel AT
Taxpayer
Taxpayer Addr P(oce
/ Zone -Uses
3802400125
MAYES CHARLES S JAN
23634 156 AV SE
KENT UA 98042
101
SITE:
21690 90 AV S
LEGAL:
LOT -7 BLOCK- UNEEDAN ORCHARD IRS UNREC
LESS
N 200
8802400127
WILLIAMS MNEIL S
21819 100 AV SE
KENT WA 98931
101
SITE:
21819 100 AV SE
LEGAL:
✓ LOT -7 BLOCK- UIIEEDAN ORCHARD TRS UNREC
LESS
THAT P
8802400130
GASKILL 6014RIE
00139 RIVER DR
OUINCY WA 98848
101
SITE:
22025 100 AV SE
LEG/AL
LOT-8 0LOCK- UNEEDAN ORCHARD IRS UNREC
8802400485
HOBBS WAYNE G ✓
01019 E LAUREL
KENT WA 98031
101
SITE:
09040 S 222 ST
)V LEGAL:
i LOT -25 BLOCK UNEEDAN CRCIIARD IRS
UNREC LESS
CO RD
8802400505
HODES WAYNE G ti/
01019 E LAUREL
KENT VA 98031
101
SITE:
09840 S 222 SI
LEGAL:
iLOT 26 BLOCK UIIEEDAV CRCIIARD IRS
UNREC TAY
FOR PA
8802400525
JACKSON DWIGHT A
09650 S 222 ST
KENT UA 98031
101
[I/ SITE:
09650 5 222 Sr
LEGAL:
SLOT -27 BLOCK- UNEEDAN ORCHARD IRS
UNREC FOR
OF E 1
8802400530
KOGPMAHS RICIIARD L•CIN 09642 S 222 S1
KWPMANS,ARVEN
KENT WA 98031
101
SITE:
09642 S 222 SI
LEGAL:--'LOT-27
BLOCK UNEEDAN ORCHARD IRS
UHAEC E 1/2 LESS
8802400535
KCCPMANS RANDY
09708 S 222
KENT WA 90931
101
SITE:
09708 S 222 SI
LEGAL:
/LOT FOR 27 BLOCK- UNEEDAN ORCHARD
IRS UNREC
RP ACT
8802400540
KOOPHANS ARVEN
10020 SE 192 ?? b S
RENTON WA 98055 q s `
901
SITE:
LEGAL
iL0T POR 27 BLOCK UNEEDAN ORCHARD
IAS UIIREC
Lot 1
REPORT: GB&A0
PAGE 8
Lot/Acres Lord Value Inp Value
0.918 42,900 110,200
3.810 92,600 100,400
4.750 157,700 76,300
4.610 -156,000 300
4.950 .161,100 58,300
0.920 58,3C0 158,600
1.360 75,500 80,300
0.993 60,000 97,046
1.500 78,000 0
�C9N
JAN -
YE Lu
3 iS54
CITY OF KENT
CITY
CLERK
1. SUBJECT:
Kent City Council Meeting
Date February 15, 1994
Category Bids
����,�yq�
TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT REITAN�AND JASON i'UV'
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: ,1, -''Bid opening for this project was held 6h
February 2nd with two bids received. The low bid was sub-
mitted by The V Company in the amount of $42,000.00. The
Engineer's Estimate was $46,000.00. The project consists of a
signal system installation, primarily pedestrian activated.
The Public Works Committee has recommended that this bid be
accepted.
3. EXHIBITS: P blic Works minutes, Public Works Director
memorandum a d vicinity map
4. RECOMMENDED BY PU b I G ODf iS VArn r1t2Z
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO_�,,-� YES
FISCAL PERSONNELOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE RE UIRE : $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Councilmember move, Couneil-member seconds
that the contract for the Traffic Signal at Reiten & Jason be
awarded to The V Company in the bid amount of $42,000.00.
beV\V\V+I 5e cou,(AZd cid 4KAk- wX_i�ay� cwntd .
DISCUSSION:
ACTION• M
Council Agenda
Item No. 5A
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
FEBRUARY 2, 1994
TO: PUBLIC WORKS �CO`1M1MITTEE
FROM: DON WICKSTROM V(�`�1
RE: SIGNAL AT REITEN ROAD & JASON AVENUE
Bid opening for this project was held February 2nd, with two bids
received. The low bid was submitted by The V Company in the amount
of $42,000.
BID SUMMARY
The V Company
$42,000.00
Service Electric Company $44,444.00
Engineer's Estimate $46,000.00
ACTION: Recommend the low bid of $42,000 be accepted and the
contract awarded to The V Company.
NADEM AVE tN Ii MCOLN
r'
_Z
f 3AV H1tL w AVE
1'�! .• T
ir" . � 3 .• r. � x
i 6TH H A • Z
E 6TH AVE
AVE
f STH 7 i ,, AVEE i S STH AVEti > ..
• M ETH AVE
¢j;® f4TH AVE N 4TH AVE N N
i. Z yj
E 3RD AYE 2 1 n' a w r_Y. 6 .
., �. -4•i r -F N 3RD
w w N KIWAN 8
i 7 -r 2ND ~ AVE 2ND
I'.tltK o
N C 2ND
• w W w w w AVE -
fOTH AVE f IST AVE "•� 41 S ISTD A p 137 AVE
S RAILROAD ; AVE F N IRA LROAD AVE
f AVE CE "4
1' Or ; o N
9 CENTRAL AVIS AV
w > 3 0106 f TE N STATE 'AVE; r �I�A N STA r_ _ z
_ N rV V S ♦ 31— AVE
14 L N
(JI A ~ i
SCENIC WAY -wi M S N ~ �.�� •tiT
WJ. HILLCREST AVE ° ^ A' NOOfORD A ''•'` t
......."..._.. y O �O 'L 3NM371 j
S�
KIRK nN N c
O �; i►` ti A CLARK AVE
4
KEN KE(:•r:9 AVE
w n� 4J m i N N JASON aAVE .
i ti 2Yµ AVE
rYE:[ ; N CT AVE
ANTER 1
w
O M �� �a
1� C -4"P ;' :A N y LENORA AVE
R i CRESTA x m DER as AVE 2[� '" N AVE A
A A m F q 1� 2 S .P m
XX
LN • e , w S �c A
AVE LANE � �s! � Q x w '� O'' .- `• Y p ALYORD AYE '�
AVE ^ S yxi "t
EW r w b VIEW
� J> �' f c` N 7 •, _3 4T MLLTOI AVE
M
i REITEN RD w v1_ w ^� AYE
N
+ s -� 6 <<.���• ° $i S 92ND PL
YA/LEwppD AYC• r { . •` ',
y�
C
i KIYSEA4F�O^ t o
o
4 • �Q 4, r z
N j y AVE ..;��' ,.•{•� (j. 94TN AVEgin
f f
Ps w
u
95TH PL
rlo� r`.•.�` •3AV L`'"' ,�'`: N-> AVE s SAYE s 3 STii ~A
c
7THAVE P 1.1A
I
w N w
♦ �. 1f M. 1'
* t. 1�•' 1 96TH AYE S p S ° T
i�f •.ter"� y '
N A
w
99TH AVE S ~
Of _
wort+ . AVE sc 07 IODTH
AVE
t1jAj rNN
AVC sE Ii v
A^ 102NO. ..barricade
7 SIGNAL AT REITEN ROAD & JASON AVENUE AVE a �
O N
_a 2
U ^ A N
PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE
FEBRUARY 2, 1994
PRESENT: PAUL MANN MAY MILLER
JIM BENNETT LINDA JOHNSON
TIM CLARK MR & MRS RUST
DON WICKSTROM
0 Signal at Reiten & Jason
Wickstrom stated that we received two bids within the engineer's
estimate and we are recommending award to the low bidder. He
pointed out that this does include traffic control. Wickstrom said
that originally we were looking at just a pedestrian activated
signal but we had to install some controls because of traffic
turning out of Reiten. Regarding the pocket between Canyon Drive
and this intersection, Bennett asked if this signal will still
allow enough flow without the problem of traffic backup on Canyon.
Wickstrom said the two signals are not integrated; this will be a
free flowing signal, according to our traffic staff. Wickstrom
said the signal will be primarily pedestrian operated.
Committee unanimously recommended acceptance of the low bid and
award of the contract to the V Company.
R.V. Rest Stop - Naden Avenue
Wickstrom said we are proposing a 5 stall R.V. Rest Stop with
parking only; no facilities available. Wickstrom said the cost for
this installation would be approximately $13,000 noting that we
have funds left over from the overlay project we did on 4th Avenue.
In response to Clark, Wickstrom said this is not anticipated to
become a revenue producer for the City. He said if we did, we
would be competing with KOA and as such, a policy decision would be
appropriate. Wickstrom said the facility would be signed, 1124 Hour
Parking Only" and that would be subject to policing. The
suggestion was made from the audience that a "bulletin board" type
of structure be installed where up -coming- city events could be
posted as well as road directional signs for the R.V. rest stop.
Mann asked if the bulletin board and road signs could be included
in the cost. Wickstrom agreed and said this was something we could
do.
Committee unanimously recommended the installation of the R.V. Rest
Stop on Naden Avenue, with road directional signs and bulletin
board to be included in the construction cost.
(continued)
CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS
A.
R E P O R T S
A. COUNCIL PRESI
B. OPERATIONS COMMI
C. PUBLIC WORKS
D. PLANNING
E. PUBLIC SAFETY
F. PARKS
G. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MINUTES
January 3, 1994
The scheduled meeting of the Kent Board of Adjustment was called to
order by Chair Jack Cosby on the evening of Monday, January 3, 1994
at 7 p.m. in Chambers West, Kent City Hall.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEMBERS:
Jack Cosby, Chair
Ron Banister
Doug Gesler
Berne Biteman, Vice Chair, absent
Walter Flue, absent
CITY STAFF MEMBERS:
Fred Satterstrom, Planning Manager
Lois Ricketts, Recording Secretary
APPROVAL OF THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MINUTES
Mr. Banister MOVED that the minutes of the December 6, 1993 meeting
be approved as written. Mr. Gesler SECONDED the motion. Motion
carried.
Chair Cosby administered the oath to all who intended to speak.
PACIFIC DETROIT DIESEL VARIANCE - #V-93-5 (FS)
Fred Satterstrom presented the applicant's request for a variance
from Kent Zoning Code Section 15. 08.050(9)(b)(3) which requires
hazardous substance land uses to be set back one-quarter mile
(approximately 1,300 feet) from public parks and recreation areas.
The subject site is located at 7215 228th Avenue South and is
approximately five acres in size. The site is zoned M1, Industrial
Park District. The applicant wishes to house regional
sales/administration offices, parts distribution, engine and
transmission storage, engine and transmission remanufacturing and
tests, fabrication shop and shop for component replacement and
incidental repair and maintenance work on trucks, buses and motor
homes. The site lies approximately 500 feet from the Interurban
Trail which does not meet the quarter mile distance requirement.
The land use pattern in the general vicinity is light industrial.
The hazardous substances proposed on the subject property include
paint stripper, enamel, acrylic, urethane hardener, primers,
aerosols, brake fluid, silicone sealers, cleaners, oil, coolants
diesel fuel, transmission fluid and petroleum products. The
variance would not constitute a grant of special privilege because
there are numerous existing properties in the area which have
similar uses. The special circumstance is that the entire site is
Kent Board of Adjustment
January 3, 1994
located within one-quarter mile of the Interurban Trail. Granting
this variance would not be materially detrimental to the public
welfare. By setting back the proposed building an additional 50
feet from the eastern property line, the total setback from the
Interurban Trail would be 550-570 feet. (The staff report was
corrected to read 50 feet from the eastern property line, not 80
feet. The staff report stated that 600 feet from the Interurban
Trail was the area for the proposed building site. This was
changed to 550-570 feet.) The Fire Department stated that the
proposed substances are below risk level and can be handled by
existing personnel.
Chair Cosby asked why there were changes from 80 feet to 50 feet
and from 600 to 550-570 feet.
Mr. Satterstrom responded that Armin Quilici, a Kent Planner, had
discussions with the applicant and understood that the building
would be placed 80 feet from the property line which would be
approximately 600 feet from the trail. This evening he was shown
a more specific plan that reduced the 80 feet by 30 feet down to
50 feet.
Dave Keeley, project architect for Pacific Detroit Diesel, felt the
staff report addressed the issues pertinent to the project. The
large site plan given to Mr. Quilici showed the position of the
tanks for the outside facility to be within 50 feet of the property
line. The actual building with the service bay area would be
within 80 feet. There will be an outside, above -ground containment
area for a 500 -gallon diesel storage, 250 gallon storage tank for
40 weight oil, automatic transmission fuel, and two waste oil
recovery tanks. The building would be set back 80 feet, but the
containment area would be set back only 50 feet from the property
line. Pacific Detroit Diesel is a distributor, wholesaler,
warehouse and support for Allison Transmissions, Detroit Diesel
Engines, and Koller Generators, but they primarily function as a
distributor. They are not in the service or repair business. They
test engines, rebuild engines, rebuild transmissions, all of which
need deep oil to test them and lube oils to get them running. They
also provide the service to change the oil, filters, etc. The
service bay area is a drive-through facilities which is large
enough to accommodate articulated buses used by Metro. They have
a contract for warranty repair work for all those facilities. The
site is separated from the trail by adjacent properties as well as
topography changes between their site and the trail. If there were
any spillage, it could not get to the trail because of a
containment area that is located outside the service bay area on
the east side of the building. The enclosure will have concrete
walls on two sides and will be covered with a roof. It will be
2
Kent Board of Adjustment
January 3, 1994
landscaped according to the zoning code. There will be a six-inch
curb that is capable of accommodating the largest container of
chemicals in case it should rupture. There will be a drain in the
middle of the containment area that will be kept closed. This
system is approved by Metro for discharge and cleaning of any
products before draining into the sanitary sewer. Pacific Detroit
Diesel is currently located in Seattle on East Marginal Way.
Mr. Gesler MOVED to close the public hearing. Mr. Banister
SECONDED the motion. Motion carried.
Mr. Gesler MOVED that the variance be granted. Mr. Banister
SECONDED the motion. Motion carried unanimously.
ELECTION OF OFFICERS
Mr. Banister MOVED that the election of officers be postponed until
the next meeting. Mr. Gesler SECONDED the motion. Motion carried.
ADJOURNMENT
Mr. Gesler MOVED that the meeting be adjourned
SECONDED the motion. Motion carried.
The meeting was adjourned at 7:45 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
J me P. Harris, Secretary
3
Mr. Banister
Parks committee Minutes
February 89 1994
councilmembers Present: Christi Houser, Chair; Jim Bennett and Paul Mann.
Staff Present: Tom Brubaker,
Patrice Thorell, Robyn Bartelt, Bill Wolinski,
Jack
Pam
Others Present: Amiel and Janice Forshee, 4109 S. 243rd Place, Kent WA 98032;
Kris and Vic Case, 3739 S. 243rd St., Kent, WA 98032; Mike
Kelly, 20416 244th Ave. SE, Kent, WA 98032; Steve Pede4ana,
13503 SE 251st Place, Kent, WA 98042; Rick Liechty, 17303 SE
238th, Kent, WA 98042; Keith Sanden, Riverbend Golf Complex.
PROPOSED PARK AT MIDWAY RESERVOIR SITE
Over the past year and a half, it has been discussed at Parks Committee meetings
and in various correspondence that the City of Seattle is interested in selling
the Midway Reservoir site. At that time, approximately 200 West Hill residents
signed a petition asking the City of Kent to purchase the property for
recreational purposes. 100 of those residents were willing to participate in an
Adopt -A -Park program to help take care of the park.
Amiel Forshee explained that the property has been used for 30 years by children
adults f
ohave lyansafe safe toother
play recreational
auparkes. wouldResidents
want
upgrade the
neighborhood.
Councilmember Houser explained that the City of Kent has been working with the
City of Seattle and is interested in purchasing the property, depending upon the
price and terms.
Patrice Thorell reported that other groups have also expressed an interest in
purchasing the property: the City of Federal Way in interested in the property
as a water reservoir site; the National Guard is interested in purchasing a
to expand their parking area; and King County Planning
portion of the property
and Development is interested in the land for low income housing. The property
is appraised at $187,000. The City of Seattle is willing to agree to terms of
20% down and 7% interest over a 10 year contract.
The Seattle Water Department has put all issues regarding the property on hold
until May. In the meantime, Seattle will investigate all possible uses for the
property and then meet with interested groups and discuss who they want to sell
the property to.
Councilmember Mann moved to have staff continue to pursue purchase of this
property. Councilmember Bennett seconded. The motion passed unanimously.
Thorell added that the Parks Department has enough capital dollars in 1994 as
matching funds from the CIP for park purposes. Some of those dollars can be
reallocated for this project.
Steve Pedegana explained that -the -American Legion organization is proposing to
provide some enhancements to Kent Memorial Park. Those enhancements include an
announcer/ scorekeeper booth, covers for the dugouts, and foul poles on the
outfield wall corners. Mr. Pedegana explained that this would be at no expense
to the City. The Legion is proposing to provide all labor and materials.
Patrice Thorell explained that the proper procedure is for the American Legion
to work with City staff to work out the details. Once details have been worked
out, the City would accept the enhancements.
Councilmember Bennett moved to accept the American Legion's proposed enhancements
to Kent Memorial Park once all details are worked out with City staff.
Councilmember Mann seconded. The motion passed unanimously.
LAKE FENWICK RESTORATION PROJECT REPORT
The Public Works Department is addressing various water quality problems in Lake
Fenwick. The land draining to the lake has degraded in quality and the lake's
oxygen content has decreased resulting in insufficient oxygen.
Public Works is looking at corrective measures to the inlet to the lake. They
are constructing a wetland area to allow natural uptake of plants and installing
an aerating system in the main body of the lake to correct the oxygen problem.
Another part of the project involves stabilizing those areas affected by erosion
due to high foot traffic.
One specific problem slope area is the area known as the tree swing area.
Because of high use, all of the vegetation in the area has been trampled. Other
problems in this area include dumping, littering, and partying. Because
recreation is one of the objectives of the overall project, -Public Works is
proposing to use a phased approach to try to address the problem. If the area
continues to be degraded, the City will have to take further action to restrict
use of the area. Staff has talked with arborists, and the recommendation is to
selectively remove branches of the tree which would eliminate the swing.
Wolinski said that hopefully it will not come to this, but if the area continues
to be degraded, the slope and tree will be washed into the lake anyway. Staff
plans to visit the site and talk with users of the area to try and get the
community to take ownership and police the area themselves on a voluntary basis.
Tom Brubaker commented that because the City is aware that the tree swing is
there and continues to leave it there, we are leaving ourselves open to be sued
if someone is injured. He added that the City may be increasing its potential
liability by adding controlled access and inviting users to the area.
Councilmember Mann moved to instruct Public Works staff to remove selected
branches of the tree according to the process deemed most appropriate by the
Public Works Department. Councilmember Bennett seconded. The motion passed 2-1,
with Councilmember Houser opposing.
3
AS COMPLETE take of these
Councilmemer
ie nett to m ncel as soonoasZpunch listoitems have pe
beencompleted.
projects rec ccted and the
Councilmember Mann seconded. The motion passed unanimously.
It was discussed at the agenda meeting
itemswill that
nonccomeojecto sare
arksCommePtee anymore
project is within budget,
but will be taken directly to Council as a Consent Calendar item.
RIVERBEND GOLF COMPLEX DIRECTOR'S REPORT
Keith Sanden reported that preliminary reports Hefsaidf�th t ethe vnew thatJanuary
JCourse
revenues were up the largest in history.
Superintendent, Pete Petersen, is very knowledgeable and very refreshing to work
with. SSMD is working on a long range plan for complex improvements to update
the complex's
mpsoon which willMgive the CityPortthat a nsome compet tion driving range will be
opening
Repairs to the back fence at the driving range have been completed. Customer
credit files and inventory are now on the computer which will hopefully expedite
customer service. All tournaments for Men's and Women's Clubs have been set up
for the year. The golf course will sponsor a major tournament scheduled for July
31. More details will be provided at a later date.
Councilmember Mann inquired if there is anything planned for the mini putt. Mr.
Sanden said that the preliminary plan is to leave the existing mini putt in place
and build an 18 hole in the grassy area not being used. He said this project
would be his first priority because it is the most visible, would create more
goodwill and exposure, and requires less money and time to complete.
GREEN RIVER TRAIL FENCE PROJECT ACCEPTANCE
River
Trail Fence Project as
nmbrBnett Gree
npassed unanimously.
comPletemoved Mann seconded. motio
INTERURBAN TRAIL BRIDGE REPLACEMENT rrcuUCI,I nv"F
Councilmember Bennett moved to accept the Interurban Trail Bridge Replacement
Project as complete. Councilmember Mann seconded. The motion passed
unanimously. Patrice Thorell said that staff will send a thank you letter to
Puget Power for their $42,000 donation which paid for half of the project. Jack
ColuciO
Ball complimented the
construction
n P e job,h and ompleted they wo did the worky projectcon
The
Construction Company. P Y d d a
time and within budget.
CHANGE IN MEETING TIME
The Parks Committee will meet the first Tuesday of each month at 4:30 p.m.
PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE
FEBRUARY 2, 1994
PRESENT: PAUL MANN MAY MILLER
JIM BENNETT LINDA JOHNSON
TIM CLARK MR & MRS RUST
DON WICKSTROM
Signal at Reiten & Jason
Wickstrom stated that we received two bids within the engineer's
estimate and we are recommending award to the low bidder. He
pointed out that this does include traffic control. Wickstrom said
that originally we were looking at just a pedestrian activated
signal but we had to install some controls because of traffic
turning out of Reiten. Regarding the pocket between Canyon Drive
and this intersection, Bennett asked if this signal will still
allow enough flow without the problem of traffic backup on Canyon.
Wickstrom said the two signals are not integrated; this will be a
free flowing signal, according to our traffic staff. Wickstrom
said the signal will be primarily pedestrian operated.
Committee unanimously recommended acceptance of the low bid and
award of the contract to the V Company.
R.V. Rest Stop - Naden Avenue
Wickstrom said we are proposing a 5 stall R.V. Rest Stop with
parking only; no facilities available. Wickstrom said the cost for
this installation would be approximately $13,000 noting that we
have funds left over from the overlay project we did on 4th Avenue.
In response to Clark, Wickstrom said this is not anticipated to
become a revenue producer for the City. He said if we did, we
would be competing with KOA and as such, a policy decision would be
appropriate. Wickstrom said the facility would be signed, 1124 Hour
Parking Only" and that would be subject to policing. The
suggestion was made from the audience that a "bulletin board" type
of structure be installed where up -coming city events could be
posted as well as road directional signs for the R.V. rest stop.
Mann asked if the bulletin board and road signs could be included
in the cost. Wickstrom agreed and said this was something we could
do.
Committee unanimously recommended the installation of the R.V. Rest
Stop on Naden Avenue, with road directional signs and bulletin
board to be included in the construction cost.
(continued)
Additional items from Jim Bennett:
House on 218th/E Valley Highway
In response to Bennett, Wickstrom said that the Mayor has brought
up these types of "eye sores" and wanted to know what we could do
to move these things along towards development. Wickstrom said the
house has been boarded up and the City has only a certain amount of
authority in dealing with buildings such as this house. He also
noted that this falls under the Building Code.
Left Turn Lane - Willis & Bridges
Bennett felt this is a dang
have looked into this and
because of that left turn
there was a time restriction
look into this.
Light Synchronization
Brous turn out. Wickstrom said that we
there actually were accidents there
movement. Bennett suggested that if
on this, it may help. Wickstrom will
In response to Bennett, Wickstrom said we are working on this. He
noted that we had two vacant engineers positions in the Traffic
Division and we re -adjusted job duties and have filled those two
positions with one signal technician position. He said this will
now enable us to get back into signal synchronizing.
Signals on James Street
Mann asked about the status of the James Street traffic signals.
Wickstrom said there had been two locations discussed for possible
signals; one location at Jason however, the residents along Jason
do not want a light because that would tend to add more
neighborhood traffic. He said the other one was on Alvord but
there was a sight distance problem there. Wickstrom said he will
follow up on this and will present a status report at the next
Committee meeting.
Meeting Time Change
Committee unanimously agreed to change the Public Works Committee
meeting to 4:30 p.m., the 2nd and 4th Monday of each month. Mann
stated that since Monday, February 21st is a holiday, the next
Committee meeting will be Monday, February 28th at 4:30 p.m.
Meeting adjourned at 6:10 p.m.