Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
City Council Meeting - Council - Agenda - 05/03/1994
III I City o 1tv Council meeting Agenda CITY Of Z11B4T Mayor Jim White Council Members Judy Woods, President Jim Bennett Jon Johnson Tim Clark Paul Mann Christi Houser Leona Orr May 3, 1994 Office of the City Clerk CITY OF LEM �T�su�A MAYOR: Jim Jim Bennett Jon Johnson SUMMARY AGENDA KENT CITY COUNCIL MEETING May 3, 1994 Council Chambers 7:00 p.m. White COUNCILMEMBERS: Tim Clark Paul Mann Judy Woods, President Christi Houser Leona Orr CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL 1. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Ay/-, "Keep A Friend Alive" Design Contest Awards Ceremony B� Proclamation - Pediatric Interim Care Center Day C.✓ Proclamation - National Corrections Officer Week D.,� Proclamation - Greater Puget Sound Safe Boating Week E.V Proclamation - National Public Works Week F.✓1 Proclamation - Letter Carriers Food Drive Day Ga/ Introduction of Mayor's Appointees GA// H.•Employee of the Month I.V Regional Justice Center Update J.V Teen Center Task Force Report 2. PUBLIC HEARINGS AV LID 342 - Smith Street Sidewalks, Washington Avenue to 64th Avenue B.✓ LID 344 - Traffic Signal at SE 240th and 108th SE 3. CONSENT CALENDAR A.V Approval of Minutes B.✓ Approval of Bills C.V Appointment - Civil Service Commission A is Commission 4. 5. 6. 7. D.v Appointment - r E ✓ Riverbend Proposed 1994 Buyout Fund Projects and Improvements F Riverbend Proposed 1994 Greens Fee Schedule G.✓ Hardship Case - Charge in Lieu of Assessment H.V Police Office Technician II - Authorization I.✓ Interlocal Agreement with City of Des Moines Regarding Midway Crossing J.V Open Space - Budget Change OTHER BUSINESS A.1 Hours of Operation for Licensed B.✓ Sale and Discharge of Fireworks C.V Compensation of Councilmembers f)*" PV1 LtY'Yl ���fl�MEnfi BIDS A. Green River Levee Improvements CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS REPORTS *** EXECUTIVE SESSION Litigation *** Premises - Ordinance Ordinance Ordinance Property Acquisition and Pending 8. ADJOURNMENT NOTE: A copy of the full agenda packet is available for perusal in the City Clerk's Office and the Kent Library. An explanation of the agenda format is given on the back of this page. Any person requiring a disability accommodation should contact the City in advance for more information. For TDD relay service call 1-800-635-9993 or the City of Kent (206) 854-6587. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Citizens wishing to address the Council will, at this time, make known the subject of interest, so all may be properly heard. A) "Keep A Friend Alive" Design Contest Awards Ceremony B) Proclamation - Pediatric Interim Care Center Day C) Proclamation - National Corrections Officer Week D) Proclamation - Greater Puget Sound Safe Boating Week E) Proclamation - National Public Works Week F) Proclamation - Letter Carriers Food Drive Day G) Introduction of Mayor's Appointees H) Employee of the Month I) Regional Justice Center Update J) Teen Center Task Force Report w. �0 Kent City Council Meeting DateMay 3 1994 Category Public Hearings 1. SUBJECT: LID 342 - SMITH STREET SIDEWALKS, WASHINGTON AVENUE TO 64TH AVENUE MMARY STAm n ori--'tkTe- ' MENT 2. SU : —fi his date has been set for the public hearing on the final assessment roll of LID 342, Smith Street Sidewalks, Washington Avenue to 64th Avenue. The Public Works Director will give a brief description of the project along with other pertinent information. 3. EXHIBITS: Public Works Director memorandum and vicinity map 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: OPEN HEARING: 8' PUBLIC INPUT: rLv CLOSE HEARING: u� 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: 10 Councilmember moves Councilmember seconds to make the material contained in the Council agenda packet on this item part of the record. w+% DISCUSSION: ACTION• �n . lL 2O Councilmember IYlYLIM/ moves Councilmember seconds to direct the City Attorney to prepare an ordinance adopting LID 342, Smith Street Sidewalks from Washington Ave. to 64th Avenue. P•o DISCUSSION: I Vur"- ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 2A DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS May 3, 1994 TO: Mayor White & City Council FROM: Don Wickstrom,oDirector of Public Works RE: LID 342 - Smith Street Sidewalk (Washington Avenue to 64th Avenue) The hearing on May 3, 1994 is the confirmation hearing on the final assessment roll for LID 342. BACKGROUND Resolution No. 1351 adopted by City Council on April 6, 1993 established Mav 4, 1993 for the formation public hearing on LID 342. All of tis was the result of a request received by the Public Works Committee and subsequent contact with property owners. Due to insufficient protest, City Council approved Ordinance No. 3115 creating the LID. Bids have been received and construction is just beginning. Finalizing the assessment roll at this time will allow bonds to be sold sooner, thereby reducing interim interest costs and overall project cost. SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS Description: The project consists of the installation of 5' - 6.5' wide cement concrete sidewalks on both sides of Smith Street from Washington Avenue to 64th Avenue. hie sidewalk will be adjacent to the e_xdsting curb with no p-lariter-strip. Cement concrete driveway sections will be installed in the sidewalk at existing driveways. Existing utilities and other improvements which will interfere with the sidewalk will be adjusted or relocated. Wheelchair ramps will be installed in the sidewalks at crosswalks. Street lighting is being relocated and replaced including two additional lights. ON FROM TO West Smith Street N. Washington Avenue 64th Avenue South NEED FOR IMPROVEMENT The properties adjacent to the project are zoned commercial and multi -family. As such, substantial pedestrian traffic is generated. City Standards therefore require that City streets such as this, have sidewalks to address the pedestrian traffic. Sidewalks are required to bring Smith Street up to current City Standards. This need has been recognized for many years. Various properties within the LID have been required to execute no protest LID covenants for sidewalks upon obtaining various development permits. Currently there are covenants representing 53.57% of the LID. Also, it is our understanding that the Catholic Community Services, certain the owner that initiated this LID, is unable to obtain physically grant funding due to the lack of sidewalk access for phy y Y challenged people. PROJECT COST Since construction is not complete, final costs are unknown at this time. However, the final project cost is estimated at approximately $113,265 based on the low bid, current expenditures and estimated future costs. Since this project is utilizing both LID funds and City sidewalk funds, the final assessment roll has been established with the balance of the project cost to be covered by the sidewalk funds. This will allow -finalizing the roll before construction without an exact final cost. Due to the increase in project costs over the preliminary esti 00Oatto the final assessment amount is being increased $BfOO LID $74,926.50, approximately an 11.95 percent increase is approximately 50% of the project increases. In addition to the above, the traffic engineering operating budget the cost thelillumina tion system which fund aproximatey 5was fnot part oftthe pexpand original scope of work. METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Each property with frontage on Smith Street within the project limits iost is being affecteds sproperties based onefront cfootage on Smith rStd to the being assessed. ree PAYMENT OF ASSESSMENT Upon Council passing, the ordinance confirming the final assessment roll (after completion of the construction), there is a 30 -day period in which any portion or all of the assessment he n be pad without interest charges. After the 30 -day p payment al nce i paid over a ten year period wherein each year's th of the principal plus interest on the unpaid balance. The interest will be what the market dictates. Foe 10.1 rRAatR t�v�� 2 N W A C f RUSs[LL ROAD <iY (63RD AVE f) a P 1 Z 64TH AVE 3 L 54 TH AVE.S 53 TH AVE. S O ; z cD cD � s CD OD CD Ow 00� 64 TH A', u H I AV[ � 1 t O O Y s i a r .A V " o S V 2 s a P 1 Z 64TH AVE 3 L 54 TH AVE.S 53 TH AVE. S O ; z cD cD � s CD OD CD Ow 00� 64 TH A', u H I AV[ � 1 t O O Y s i a r .A V " o S V • N W ^.' A M MASMI VE N r M VI - s MAW11W?OM AVE Qc 4 L4 L. Z FC } N p C� D 72nD AVE `- p$ A'�1 r PL 5 N LIMCOL!' .•� � M v 9 NADEN AVE >tD/l _ AYi� O ? 1 `: D a r 2: IF � s =/•mac;' � =_ x N, JF 9TH fl•11 AK �1 K •.. K E i s STNH AYE N STH AK �, M � aTM t A N 4TH AYE �1'�' ? yf LID 342 — SMITH STREET SIDEWALKS z LLI LL U 5 J LU 0 0 0 Lu0 O O a N019NINSttti1 '1NN 1771YA 'M urmumniTnrmumm� _••—�•• IPI YS�. il.lTlTiTI'(mT111IT �u TU TTi --J I ' O i-�C•'-JI e z O Ig- w mr o V) u co 0 w� J e y En 1 L., ii c •nlwuwu ••:u�—i-- N019NINSttti1 '1NN 1771YA 'M urmumniTnrmumm� _••—�•• �u TU TTi --J O I O� = e z O w mr o V) u co 0 w� J e y En c ' O N019NINSttti1 '1NN 1771YA 'M urmumniTnrmumm� _••—�•• �u TU TTi --J � e I ; 1 Ou o --- — c i I j 1 : I S •3AY 'Nlh3 I i L1] W (n f t= J WWA Kent City Council Meeting N, Date May 3. 1994 / ( Category Public Hearings 1. SUBJECT: LID 344 - TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT SE 240TH AND 108TH SE 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works Committee, this date has been set for the public hearing on the final assessment roll of LID 344, Traffic Signal at SE 240th St. & 108th Ave. SE. The Public Works Director will give a brief description of the project along with other pertinent information. 3. EXHIBITS: Public Works Director memorandum and vicinity map 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO V/ YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended RE EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: OPEN HEARING: PUBLIC INPUT • CLOSE HEARING: 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: 0 Councilmember lv, nN moves, Councilmember seconds to make the material contained in the Council agenda packet on this item part of the record. DISCUSSION: ACTION• P {JL4 11 CG'I 2O Councilmember �IytlurY moves, Councilmember WA- seconds to direct the City Attorney to prepare an ordinance adopting LID 344, Traffic Signal at SE 240th St. & 108th Ave. SE. DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 2B DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS MAY 3, 1994 TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Don Wickstrom " RE: LID 344 - SE 240th Street Traffic Signal Please include the attached memorandum on LID 344 in your May 3rd Council packet. This was inadvertently omitted and should be included just before the memorandum regarding "LID 344 Final Assessment Roll Protests". DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS May 3, 1994 TO: Mayor White an City Council FROM: Don Wickstroirector of Public Works RE: LID 344 - SE 240th Street and 108th Ave SE Traffic Signal The hearing on May 3, 1994 is the confirmation hearing on the final assessment roll for the above mentioned project. BACKGROUND Due to a recent accident and other accidents at the above referenced intersection, several petitions from nearby residents were submitted to the City requesting the installation of a traffic signal. City staff reviewed the signal warrant criteria at the subject intersection and found that sufficient warrants were met. Therefore the staff and the City Council's Public Works Committee unanimously agreed to pursue the traffic signal installation. The City proposed to fund a portion of the project cost with the remaining funds being provided by the formation of a Local Improvement District (LID). Therefore Resolution No. 1376 was adopted by City Council on December 71 1993. The public hearing on the formation of LID 344 was held on January 41 1994. Only 0.60% protest was received, therefore City Council approved Ordinance No. 3152 on January 18, 1994. Bids have been received and the contract awarded. Construction should be complete before the end of summer. DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS The project consists of the installation of a fully actuated 8 - phase traffic signal with pedestrian detection and crossing indications at the intersection of SE 240th St. and 108th Ave. SE. PROJECT FUNDING The original total estimated cost of the project was $150,197.21. The LID portion was set at $71,702.75 leaving $78,494.46 to be funded by the City. The final cost is not known at this time, however, based on the bid of $84,724.00 for construction, the final project cost including all project costs, will be within the budgeted amount. Therefore the proposal is to maintain the same LID assessment of $71,702.75. The City funds will cover the balance of project costs. $67,337 was transferred from the 104th/260th signal project budget and originally $11,157.46 was earmarked from the James Street Safety Improvement budget. METHOD OF ASSESSMENT An LID assessment boundary was established which includes properties which utilize 108th Ave. SE for ingress and egress to SE 240th Street. The total LID cost is distributed over these properties based on a zone and termini method as specifically authorized under State law. Under this zone and termini method, eight (8) zone lines 200 feet apart were established on a radial basis from the signal. The first zone has a weighing factor of 81 the second zone a factor of 7 and so on out to the eighth zone with a factor of 1. The square footage is weighed by multiplying it by these factors. Some properties are included in more than one zone so the square footage within each zone for each parcel is weighted accordingly. This varying assessment rate per square foot was used to account for the reduction in benefit from the signal improvement the properties receive as the distance from the signal increases. Other factors affecting the distribution are as described below: 1. One half of the cost is distributed north of the intersection and the other one half south of the intersection. Bonding costs are added to this amount separately for north and south sides due to the different number of parcels. 2. The assessment distribution is based on square footage of property. A wetland exists on assessment 114. The wetland area (an approximate estimate) was deleted from the square footage calculation due to development restrictions. On the south side, the cost was also distributed to properties adjacent to the 108th Ave. alignment south to SE 244th St. However, since the road is not currently open south of the 242nd block, the southernmost properties do not currently have access to the signal. Therefore, the potential assessments for these properties were added to the city share of the funding and the LID boundary was drawn to not include these properties in the LID. E It should also be noted that originally the City considered including the single family residential properties in the vicinity of SE 236th and 237th Streets, however, this resulted in adding nearly seven thousand dollars to the project cost to collect approximately eight thousand dollars. Therefore, these properties and associated costs were dropped from the LID and the $1,235.83 that could have been collected to actually fund the signal is being funded by the City. PAYMENT OF ASSESSMENT Upon Council passing, the ordinance confirming the final assessment roll, there is a 30 -day period in which any portion or all of the assessment can be paid without interest charges. After the 30 -day period, the balance is paid over a ten year period wherein each year's payment is 1/10th of the principal plus interest on the unpaid balance. The interest will be what the market dictates. File 10.1 r1054 3 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS April 28, 1994 TO: Mayor White and City Council J FROM: Don Wickstrom, Director of Public Works /RE: LID 344 - 108th Ave. SE & SE 240th St. Traffic Signal Final Assessment Roll Protests The following is a listing of protests received and the Engineering Department's response thereto. See attached copies. Assessment #4 Mary F. Behrendsen 22802 132nd Avenue SE Kent, WA 98042 Final Assessment $2,124.83 A valid protest requires that the property owner provide creditable evidence that demonstrates that the benefit to the property (increase in property value) derived from the LID improvements is less than the LID assessment. To do so generally requires a before and after appraisal of the property by a MIA appraiser. In this case the property owner did not provide such an appraisal. Instead there is an opinion of fair market value given by a realty company, however, no comparable analysis is given to justify the value. It also didn't specify whether this is a before or after value. Further, the other data supplied, such as the purchase price and County assessed value, have no relation to the value of the property immediately prior to the installation of the improvements. Also the fact that the property has not sold is irrelevant. As such, the information presented is not creditable to warrant adjustment of the assessment. Lastly the owner states that the property is undeveloped and does not generate traffic. It should be noted that LID assessments are based on the highest and best potential use of the property, not current use. The subject property is 1 acre in size and zoned CC, Community Commercial. Upon developing, which could happen anytime, there will definitely be a traffic impact on the intersection of 240th Street and 108th Avenue SE. Further, as with other undeveloped properties within the area a developement condition thereof would be the execution of a no - protest LID agreement to participate in a pro -rata share ertths signal project. As such, whatever the value of the P before or after, included therein is an obligation to participate and pay a share of the signal costs. In summary, based on the above, it is recommended that no adjustment of the assessment be made. Assessment #9 Sam D. & Raye Behar Isaac D. & Eleanor Behar 5838 Seward Park Avenue East Seattle, WA 98118 Final Assessment $431.20 The property owner provided no supporting evidence to warrant any assessment adjustment. As such, it is recommended that no adjustment of the assessment be made. April 19, 1994 City Of Kent 220 4th Avenue South Kent WA 98032-5895 HHE � R ED APR 19 1994 CITY OF KENT CITY CLERK Subject: LID 344 - 108th Ave SE & SE 240th Traffic Singal Protest of Assessment Sir: This letter is to protest the amount of $2,124.83 assessment on property located at: 17-22-05 Tax Lot #9290 Lot 3 of Kent SPC 78-34 Recording No. 7812200838 of said plat; thence S 89011'36" W 123.72 feet; thence N 89044130" W 71.87 feet; thtnee S 00 01103" E along prolongation of W line E z SW a SE a SE a of said Sec 17 distance 1.00 foot to S line of S 2 NW a SE a SE 4 of said Section 17; thence S 89°44' 30" E along said S line 319.37 feet to Point of Beginning. Also known as Parcel "C" as delineated per City of Kent Lot Line Adjustment No LL -90-18 Recording No 9006050223 and less W 10 feet of remainder conveyed to City of Kent by Deed under Recording No. 9106131354. Tax Lot #172205-9290 This property is not being benefitted to the amount of the assessment for the following: 1) Property is undeveloped and does not generate any traffic. 2) Purchase price of property was $163000.00, assessed value is $261,600 by the County, but have been unable to sell. 3) Recent Fair Market Value (enclosed copy) by Re/Max Realty states that the Fair Market Value is $185012.00. I would appreciate your reconsideration of the assessment amount. Sincere Mary F Behrendsen 22802- 32nd Ave SE Kent WA 98042 631-6977 CD--- p V-' S V1 ._ O OV -'Orli -0 ._a m. • r rOVlra ra 11 pru -0 -n •Q- F--+ rU rU Vl r > o G¢ ram 1.1,! m �ZN Q 'F- 0 V o cn Z Ir X33 f "'_OJ LUF- a Q< Lu F-- � > SDH o¢ Z Z O wMy o a c O N rU IT r m L (� 7 J m J m >�w wz c c> x 2 ¢Q O L C E JJ 7 w CL > o G¢ J t J F' J L� ✓� W f" O mo `Ora S Qom Vl R' mr�V7S S r-mrli rl Q'l.r7Q'�n rr Gl.J1 ra R a]S VI QJ r ra rr a r ZO m co � m CD o CD a O Qo W � a - cc L , Loo O LL Z z Z F- O o CL ¢ O LL w W o O LL a ¢ p 1 (n ¢ p w u N W wjr m Q 1 LLJ X 2Lu Lfl Naz F'Rl O Q S I z ¢ rU O r Ln dO a 7 OU. aQ N z 0 V) Ccw IL z C) z 4 CL z LU z 3 rn ccF Q a J J Q z z m rr w 7 -,Li =H l� A ZZ W rU vim Ari Q 2 3 Wrtl O:fOF- SQoZ WrU41 mrvu a - R1 _n N r W Lrt N N O H I -SW > ry a\- a rU J,a a IL. _ r, WO F- ANS ca H 1- O Vl L- rLTQ10E- Vlmm L- a ra 1 co -r O cop\p n- r-prap m p r1i rU N tr-vrvw ru a rariz vl Q'"c o (4 rl"" W t- ova rr ZO W A WZR1_.l A NL \ Q l7. -i S VI IL Z \ p O H W r -i I•- 1 A o n:L rima 13AL.) rU O "W -m 1 P-IJIi O r-OWQ1i OC)f raJIL'AOV0. i F ' V March 30, 1994 Mary Behrendsen 22802 132nd Avenue SE Kent, WA 98042 Dear Mary: Jerry Crawford The Team On The Move Toll Free 1-800-669-9196 As promised I am enclosing the property tax profiles on the four properties needed by you for your attorney. Below is a quick summary of the requested information. The Fair Market Value of your properties are as follows: EXHIBIT "A": $119,500 Single Family Home EXHIBIT "B": $185,512 43,560 Square Feet x $4.25 per Foot Commercially Zoned EXHIBIT "C": $150,000 2 -Story Home on 15,000 Square Foot Lot EXHIBIT "D": $180,000 3 -Acre Vacant Lot I hope this answers any questions you or your attorney may have. After reviewing the enclosed information, if you have any further questions or desire further clarification or details, please feel free to call me or my assistant Charonne Luttun at 852-4037. Sincerely yours, Jerry Crawford JC:cll Enclosures RFIM 1A 1st Choice Realty, Inc. 20920 108th Avenue S.E. Kent, Washington 98031-1101 Office: (206) 852-4037, Fax: 852-6668 24 Hour Messages: (206) 626-4999 Each Office Independently Owned and Operated EXHIBIT "B" Page 1 TRa,NSAMERICA TITLE iNSURANCCOMPANY (RENT) 03/29/94 TRW REDI PROPERTY pROFILS Prepared for:REMAX FIRST CHOICE REALTY, JERRY & LINDA CRAWFORD----------------- Pascal Number : 172205-9290-00 Q -S -T -R : SW -17-22-05 Owner/Taxpayer : BEHRENDSEN GUNTER Mailing Address 22802 132ND SE Site Address : 23901 IoSTH V SS Phone Number : (206)631-6977 Property Desc : VACANT Use Code-Desc : 923 -VA -COML IAC-5AC Land Size 1100 CC Zoning Thomas Bros : 0716D01 ASSESSMENT/TAX DATA Total Value $261,600 Land Value $261,600 Imp Value - Tax Exemption Yrs Delinquent Tax Levy Code 1525 $3,926.29 1994 Tax 1994 SrCtzn Tax; School Dist - city LAND DATA Waterfront Type - View Type - Quality Visual Exposure Green Belt Recreation Corner Lot Access Open Space KENT WA 98031 KENT WA 98011 Market Area : K1 -NORTH KEN #Units S Buildings Lot Coverage: Census Tract: 294.04 ------------------- CHARACTERISTIC DATA ------------------- *SUMMARY DATA Gross/Rentable Year Built Class/Quality Fire sprinklers: *BUILDING 1 % Gross/Rentable : Yr Built/Eff Yr: / class/Quality # stories Type Heat 1: 2: 3: 4: *BUILDING 2 Gross/Rentable 1 Yr Built/Eff Yr: / Class/Quality # Stories Type Heat = 1: 2: 3: 4: *BUILDING 3 Gross/Rentable Yr Built/Eff Yr: / Class/Quality # Stories Type Heat : I: 2: 3: 4: Information provided Copyrights1994 TRW-REDImed ble, but Propertyinot guaranteed Data CTM SAF 311I1 U31d3WHSHU81 £S:£T h66T-62-WW H .Z am O 0 I 0 m N 4m 1 in O N N 1` eq it m r - . 1 N zifn Bio O 1 n y1 1 N Ti I b .0 I co � I m 1 m alga +ilb H I to pq I o b I a m� I o + 1 0 I co I� mIm cd I IA I I t` IN 11 I b V 1 r4 A I co 1 �d 1 z Ha I O k�i CD 1 zIz mI >1I � R miwx a ac 0 a to c to pv ca 0 c co0 oE-4 N 64 N ri O mo ••I,N Moz wzm \O to 0 o >0 4 �m IV nO m 0H NWW zHzW WO C+ \ O t•t W N k. O O N N � 11f W 0 NI Z» ro 03+ P4s l O I NO -s4 •D�r y q , 1 rc 7.Oo 1 lJ MAs 1 7 0 b Hr 0 .. 4 Z 1 ! MAOI 0, pt* fir' y •,l _ / k ab IC 1 2 X. r r c • ^C ,., aCall o C �LAID. �zy ( r a r I C- " 0 CA u am �op i Bye C' Y $ - ' •o _ Asa •7 Do V5 P r Y : r CJ J v •�n1 •'� (• C�� 11 ?v o�" b R P ^-rte q, w• l �B o. , of .A i �: • Ale-ii•J[I W fi. be •; e. O 0 P 6 CL q O q r I �! Edd!AWEMdM' -1 odi �I I R m ,n to • •A _ • IA A N N i• ��i� t y o o (� r¢ e rrd 4 h .1V ---"''''N___ u m 4flT A. 0638am ° p i I• •w $ jet Aa 'faaw y �S M Td LXQgl 10 r`i i e:� �gAll 6+ 1� 42 N r� LTd i0 D•ri ft N °i ^y 0a ex.'s :r r ie. ► 411t � �� -�� � � Qir : i iri X irc � � 8 T ii 74IL �'i°a.sr7 JR"�si. "tyf N _ 431t.11 N a r1 7 s� ��—^ -� l i� l� 1! r •:1 m �l. � O� :r i`Ilj.JoeTiTR t.t7 � ,.t� o 10, -d"s� r w I: ' Y + f. r . D' >� �'sT 1 O r) 674f u -4 _4f I s N JAW w - l ' - . 6T0i£10'd T9S0 698 90E 31111 HDI83WHS14U8l 0S:£T 0661 -6Z -MW .., ...� VNI� .•{. A LUY#A*, AVI HILLTOP AY[ PL 9 [Np rL Ito PUT"�L.t t•.��, • s MAPI_[w000 AYf\, �I k t r r■ r A i K1M84A�� al; 1• yy 11 Z Q = 14TH AVE 2 - AVE .�cl �Ef,L 94TH AYE • PL r �•\'4 y`P" i Q 99TH"TH AYE • FT it ~A A 2 "'-> AYE s r a ~ r SAY • \ G N 7TH N r : t, C ~. S0-111- „;�Y.• �.! * Z 99TH AYE s O r T 0 99TH AYE S r ~ a \ i (►r �•6 w I O "'1 .� °' 100TH AY[ BE �"• 07100TH AVE 21 >l f1r� iAi>I r V 1: M 7Z 8Ai ,. `r r:�•�� AVE SE Z rzr 102ND. Barricade r 3 >r av[ SE r _ f Z a ^ n l OJ r N Q N u AVE E¢ 1 W N r2 ip 104TH AVE iE � Z 104TH CA rn • Lnf'\ D Pt SH Qm r 9�i• N � � i w a � AVIE y 109TH AVE SE N IOgrH AV[ M 109TH AVE Z JT • o 109TH 1 11P PL SE H1A�`►L 4 • �— ' 110TH 111TH AVE sF R S£ \ (M� 112TH AVE SEi r ^ ~ y m C •l•-y� /� 113TH AYE SE • C� z 7 M3'® IIJTF. ly 114TH SE 9 9 ^ ©w 114TH PL M 4� 11 T _Nip, xi ��� � N i PL SE � fV iJ O V \p O 114TH AVE SE — N FA Co 117T n I18TH m N N OI rF a rn � m rn [P - N z N U 0 N N z 119 AVE SE / y ' 1197 i • •� 120TH �vL SE N,;^t 121ST AVE.-1 F \ / 7P PL r•g 122N - w n \ O III I'L SE !I 12 IST AVE f,[ � LID 344 - TRAFFIC SIGNAL 123+Io 1» — SE 240TH ST & 108TH AVE SE Asvt t ��� NORTH --�---'---1---1---1--�---� ` 9i f T4—rL"r'-r�-r— r'`-'"i'� ` '- —'+""i°'KENT "'?� �tiaiaaa�►Laaaiia�ada►a laaal�------------ E ENT C1 Ty LIHITS • r r r r i r r r r , r r r i r � � I SE 298TH ST r • ' z F --i SE 237TH ST — --- I I L 1—lake, lt.t,l��,l,�ux,U�l{��I , r 'IG ;11'17_ 1..J 13' r r rL S6 298TH ST L.LD. (J 1 0 1 O I I I` i I _ BO 0UNDARY ' I PROPOSED i .x SIGNAL SE 240TH ST ASSESSMENT Y I NUMBER INDICA TES SIGNAL f ! L.I.D. COVENANT �I��lIL141lllll <Jllualll111111 __ _�__. r , , , , r r i • , . , r r , r ; r , r • SE 244TH ST __--- -•—•- -- �---T-----T-'T--�'-----T---T---T---TT-•-- T------1 f"r---r---r---�r-----� r---- T-' T-• r , r I I 08TH. AVE. S.E. AND S.E. 240TH. ST. PROPOSED L.I.D. FOR1 TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT 1 ri o NOUN zz APR 2 6 1994 CITY OF KENT CIN CLERK CivLcQvL Glc c,.�cp 3CSZ. /r te SAM QcH�(Z C 585W�l�� f' sod S►-Tt-E g811a� Li �b<�Z.6— S.c LCe�sT [JA ot 6j F CONSENT CALENDAR 3. City Council Action: N� r� Councilmember UVI WJ moves, Councilmember UI�UiDd�l seconds that Consent Calendar Items A through J be a roved. Discussi Act rN' o C4, 3A. Approval of Minutes. Approval of the minutes of the regular Council meeting of April 19, 1994. 3B. Approval of Bills. Approval of payment of the bills received through April 5, 1994 and paid on April 15, 1994, after auditing by the Operations Committee on April 27, 1994. Approval of checks issued for vouchers: Date 3/16/94-3/31/94 4/1/94-4/15/94 Check Numbers 141188-141780 141781-142238 Amount $2,204,758.63 11286,568.03 Approval of checks issued for payroll for March 16 through March 31, 1994 and paid on April 5, 1994 and for April 1 through April 15, 1994 and paid on April 20, 1994: Date Check Numbers 4/5/94 Checks 193653-193984 4/5/94 Advices 14081-14434 4/20/94 Checks 193985-194328 4/20/94 Advices 14435-14788 Amount $ 251,133.35 397,685.19 256,686.20 424.632.68 $1,330,137.42 Council Agenda Item No. 3 A -B Kent, Washington April 19, 1994 Regular meeting of the Kent City Council was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor White. Present: Councilmembers Bennett, Clark, Houser, Johnson, Mann, Orr and Woods, Operations Director/Chief of Staff McFall, City Attorney Lubovich, Planning Director Harris, Public Works Director Wickstrom, Fire Chief Angelo, Police Chief Crawford, Finance Division Manager Miller and Government Affairs Division Manager Martin. Approximately 20 people were at the meeting. PUBLIC Volunteer Week. Mayor White read a pro - COMMUNICATIONS clamation noting that the City of Kent has volunteers working in numerous departments and offices and serving as members of various boards, commission and committees, and declared the week of April 18-24, 1994 as Volunteer Week in the City of Kent. Introduction of Mayor's Appointees. The Mayor introduced Linda Johnson and Russ Stringham, who are his appointees to the Transit Advisory Board. CONSENT WOODS MOVED that Consent Calendar Items A CALENDAR through G be approved. Orr seconded and the motion carried. MINUTES (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3A) Approval of Minutes. APPROVAL of the minutes of the regular Council meeting of April 5, 1994. WATER (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3E) Downtown Water and Storm Drainage Improvements. AUTHORIZATION to accept as complete the con- tract with Robison Construction, Inc. for the Downtown Water & Storm Drainage Improvement project, and release of retainage after receipt of State releases, as recommended by the Public Works Committee. TRAFFIC (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3D) CONTROL SR167 - HOV Lanes - Agreement. AUTHORIZATION to execute agreements with the Washington State Dept. of Transportation, subject to some modi- fications by the Public Works Department and review and concurrence by the City Attorney, as recommended by the Public Works Committee. With the extension of the HOV lanes from 84th Ave. to W. Main Street, the State will be 1 April 19, 1994 TRAFFIC re -doing all the bridges thereon. As such, CONTROL certain City streets will be impacted with ortions of reconfigurations and detours, and p City trails will be detoured. RECYCLING (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3C) coordinated Prevention Grant Areement. ith AUTHORIZATION to execute an agreement receiveha Washington State Dept. of Ecology to $72,052 grant for education and public involve- ment of our recycling efforts, as required in the King County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan, and as recommended by the Public Works Committee. SOLID WASTE (OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4A) Residential Garbage Service Rates. In January, the City performed an audit to verify the hauler's claim for the necessity of a rate increase. The City also analyzed a claimed revenue loss attributed to instituting a re- cycling incentive garbage rate. The Public Works Committee recommended 2-1 that staff be directed to proceed with Option 2. Bennett asked why an auditor was not gathered mutually by the vendor and the City, than using a staff auditor. McFall responded that the vendor and the City agreed to use the staff auditor in the interest of time. He also noted for Bennett that the cost involved was the normal cost of the salary and benefits of the auditor. Lubovich explained for Orr that the contract originally was drafted by Steve DiJulio, who had been representing the city, with input and review by City staff. MANN MOVED to direct staff to proceed with Option 2 with the stipulation of an added compensation increase. The motion died for lack of a second. MANN THEN MOVED to direct the staff to proceed with Option 2. Houser seconded. Orr noted that Option 1 has a smaller increase than Option 21 and that information in the packet hinted that since there was the threat of legal action, the City is being asked to accept a higher rate. S he noted that if the audit if fair, as it appears 2 April 19, 1994 SOLID WASTE to be, the threat of a lawsuit is no way to address the issue. She said that an increase was requested less than six months from the date the contract was signed and -that a more reasonable rate should have been established before signing the contract. She also voiced concern about increased dump fees. Lubovich explained that the contract was exe- cuted late in 1992, and that CPI increases have been provided for in the contract. He noted that Kent Disposal asked for an increase based on their understanding of the contract; he added that he interprets the contract dif- ferently. He listed the four areas which provide for increases in rates as follows: 1) Increase in dump fees -- there have been none. 2) Unusual costs such as changes in law -- Wickstrom has determined that there has been an impact due to change in law with re- cycling and consequently 3.26 was calculated and included in Option 1. 3) Consumer Price Index. 4) Other unusual costs that reflect justified increases in operating expenses not associated with other changes. Lubovich said that the audit determined that no other changes occurred since the inception of the contract which would justify an increase, pursuant to the terms of the contract. He opined that Option 1 reflects what the con- tract allows for changes, and noted that Kent Disposal disagrees. He noted that he does not know if litigation has been threatened, but that it is common to dispute a contract because of differing interpretations. He noted that the City has not been provided with any changes which would reflect allowed adjustments under the terms of the contract. He noted that a CPI increase has been factored in under Option 1, as well as the recycling impact. Orr spoke in favor of Option 1, and noted that there is a great deal of discrepancy between the City and the vendor as to the amount of the increase necessary. She said she cannot justify a larger increase than the auditor recommended, if the contract is sound. K April 19, 1994 SOLID WASTE Lubovich noted that there has been a concern as to how long Kent Disposal will stay in the contract if they are losing money, which is why looking at different rate adjustments was suggested. Clark noted that the Public Works Committee recommended Option 2 since it appears that Kent Disposal is losing money. Wickstrom explained that the existing contract does not expire until 2001, and that it is important to look at the long term effects. Noting that an increase was requested six months after signing the original contract, Orr questioned if there is any way to prevent requests for increases in the future. Wickstrom suggested rewriting a portion of the contract to clarify that issue, and reiterated that it is important to maintain good quality service throughout the 10 -year contract period, and to find a compromise that works for the City and is reasonable for the contractor. Lubovich noted that an addendum regarding rate increases could be done subject to satisfactory negotiations. MANN MOVED to amend his motion to incorporate the comments made by Lubovich. Houser seconded. Lubovich clarified that this would be a one-time adjustment. Upon Johnson's question, Lubovich clarified that the language which the City and the hauler have agreed to must be approved and adopted by Council. Bennett recommended that Administration con- sider the need for a person who could handle contracts and capital improvement projects, rather than having each department manage their own. Orr voiced concern about whether the garbage company is getting their best deal, and noted that she would have been more comfortable if an outside audit were done and if the contract were drafted better. The motion to direct staff to proceed with Option 2, and to adopt the rate schedule in Option 2 and authorize Administration to 4 April 19, 1994 SOLID WASTE negotiate an addendum which would incorporate Administration's the rate adjustment to satisfaction then carried with Bennett and Orr opposed. HOUSING & (PUBLIC HEARINGS - ITEM 2A) Community Development Block Grant Program COMMUNITY 1995 Policies and Funding Level_ This public hear- DEVELOPMENT ing will consider the adoption of five action items for the 1995 CDBG Program, as recommended by the Planning Committee on March 15, 1994. The five items that need Council approval are to: 1) accept 1995 Pass -Through funds; 2) accept the $38,830 in 1993 recaptured funds for the 1995 program year; 3) allocate the maximum the available to the City of Kent for atePublic ($50,171); 4) the (Human) Services city's fair share maximum of 1995 Pass -Through funds to Planning and Administration ($42,336); and 5) approve the proposed 1995 local program policies. Betsy Czark of the Planning Department noted that the City is eligible to receive approxi- in funds and will mately $393,000 pass-through recapture approximately $39,000 from two projects in the 1993 program. She added that has approved the Human Services Commission the Planning Committee has these policies and recommended approval of all five action items. ORR MOVED for approval of the five action items for the 1995 CDBG Program, as recommended by the Planning Committee as follows: 1) accept 1995 Pass -Through funds; 2) accept the $38,830 in 1993 recaptured funds for the 1995 program year; 3) allocate the maximum available to the City of Kent for the Public (Human) Services ($50,171); 4) allocate the city's fair share maximum of 1995 Pass -Through funds to Planning and Administration ($42,336); and 5) approve the proposed 1995 local program policies. Houser seconded and the motion carried. FIRE (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3F) DEPARTMENT Emergency Generator - Station 74. APPROVAL for the contract related to the emergency generator at Station 74. 5 April 19, 1994 FIRE A contract was signed with VECA Electric for DEPARTMENT the purchase and installation of a standby emergency generator at Station 74. It is anticipated that the entire project will be completed within 2 months. The portion related to the VECA contract is complete. Council acceptance of the completion of VECA's contract will allow the City to contact the Department of Labor and Industries and the Department of Revenue for certification. Upon this certi- fication, retainage will be released. APPOINTMENTS (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3G) Transit Advisory Board. APPROVAL of the Mayor's appointment and reappointments to the Kent Transit Advisory Board. The Mayor has recently appointed Linda Johnson to serve as a member of the Kent Transit Advisory Board. Ms. Johnson is Executive Director of the Downtown Partnership, serves on the RJC Citizen's Advisory Committee and RJC Arts Committee and is active with the Kent Chamber of Commerce. She will replace Don McDaniel, who resigned, and her appointment will continue to 4/30/95. The Mayor has recently reappointed Claudia Otey and Russ Stringham to serve as members of the Kent Transit Advisory Board. Their new appointments will continue to 4/30/96. FINANCE (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3B) Approval of Bills._ Dates and figures are not available because the Operations Committee meeting scheduled for April 13, 1994, was cancelled. REPORTS Council President. Woods announced that she has been asked by County Executive Locke to serve on the Stadium Alternative Task Force. Operations Committee. Johnson noted that the committee will meet at 9:30 a.m. next Wednesday. A April 19, 1994 REPORTS Planning Committee. Orr noted that the Planning Committee will hold an extra meeting at 4:00 p.m. on May 3rd in the Centennial Building Conference Room. She added that they will hold their regular meeting on the third Tuesday as well. Public Safety Committee. Bennett asked the two other committee members to meet with him after tonight's meeting to establish a time to hear the curfew issue again. Administrative Reports. Woods asked that all Councilmembers receive complete Committee agenda packets in the future. McFall asked the Council to set May 10th as the date for a workshop on the Capital Facilities Plan. It was determined that several Council - members will not be available on that date, and it was agreed that Councilmembers would co- ordinate with the Mayor's Office to set a time compatible to all. Planning Director Harris pointed out this will go to the Planning Commission on June 29, so time is limited. EXECUTIVE At 7:40 the Mayor announced an executive SESSION session of approximately 10 minutes regarding litigation. ADJOURNMENT The meeting reconvened and adjourned at 7:55 p.m. t1 c xz� Brenda J cobe , v--fi�t-/ CMC City Cl rk 7 Pa Kent City Council Meeting Date May 3 1994 Category Consent Calendar SUBJECT: APPOINTMENT - CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION SUMMARY STATEMENT: Confirmation of the Mayor's appointment of Ron Banister to the Kent Civil Service Commission. The Mayor has recently appointed Ron Banister to serve as a member of the Kent Civil Service Commission. Mr. Banister is associated with Windemere Real Estate Agency, is a member of the Kent Economic Development Corporation, and has served as a member of the Kent Board of Adjustment. He will replace Carl Hart, whose appointment was nullified because of residency requirements. Mr. Banister's appointment will be in effect until 4/30/2000. 3. EXHIBITS: Memorandum from Mayor White and excerpt from Civil Service Commission minutes dated 2/24/94 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Mayor White (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended C -V 7. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember DISCUSSION: ACTION: econds Council Agenda Item No. 3C MEMORANDUM TO: JUDY WOODS, CITY COUNCIL PRESIDENT CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS 57 FROM: JIM WHITE, MAYOR -0/jm 49/--A� DATE: APRIL 25, 1994 SUBJECT: APPOINTMENT TO KENT CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION I have recently appointed Ron Banister to serve as a member of the Kent Civil Service Commission. Mr. Banister is associated with the Windemere Real Estate Agency in Kent, is currently a member of the Kent Economic Development Corporation, and has served as a member of the Kent Board of Adjustment. Mr. Banister will replace Carl Hart, whose appointment was nullified because of residency requirements. Mr. Banister's appointment will continue to 4/30/2000. I submit this for your confirmation. JW:jb cc: Catherine Guiguet, Civil Service Secretary/Chief Examiner CITY OF KENT CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION MINUTES Thursday, February 24, 1994 Members Present: Ron Forest Callius Zaratkiewicz Others Present: Sgt. Weissich, Debra Leroy, Cpt. C.E. Miller, Cpt J. Miller, Rose Nelson- Human Resource Senior Analyst, Lt. Cline, others present. Chair Forest called the meeting to order at 8:05 a.m. I. COMMISSION BUSINESS: None. II. REPORTS City Attorney, Roger Lubovich- "Mayor White had appointed Carl Hart to the Civil Service Commission. Mr. Hart brought to our attention yesterday that he was not a resident of the city. The Statute requires a three year residency in the city prior to being appointed. He has been a resident for a number of years, but six months ago he moved out of the city. Even though the Statute allows flexibility in adopting regulations that conform to the State requirements, the Citys Ordinance states that those sitting on the Commission follow the requirements of the Statute. We have no flexibility. Our requirements are those that are set forth in the Statute. Mr. Hart cannot sit on the Commission and therefore the seat is again vacant. I assume Mr. White will be making an appointment soon." Fire Chief Angelo- Scheduling conflict Police Chief, Ed Crawford- no report. Human Resource Senior Analyst, Rose Nelson- no report. III. HEARINGS IV. OLD BUSINESS Chair Forest motioned to approve the Minutes from the January 20, 1994 Civil Service Commission Meeting. Seconded and carried. Chairman Forest asked what was currently happening with Dave Santos's Reclassification. The Civil Service Examiner stated that she had prepared a Draft of the updated Position Description for Mr. Santos and sent copies to all parties concerned. She stated that her understanding was that instead of calling the position "Evidence Supervisor" it should be "Lead Evidence Technician". The difference between the Draft and the position description prepared in 1993 (after his first reclassification request was denied) is that the position now reports to the Support Services Detective Sergeant rather than the Detective Lieutenant and the Supervisory duties have been added. Kent City Council Meeting Date May 3, 1994 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: APPOINTMENT - ARTS COMMISSION 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Confirmation of the Mayor's appointment of Roger Broer to the Kent Arts Commission. The Mayor has recently appointed Roger Broer to serve as a member of the Kent Arts Commission. Mr. Broer is a career artist and is the author of our "We Are All Related" mural on the east wall of the First Interstate Bank at First and Meeker. He has done many public art projects including a project at the Department of Interior headquarters in Washington, D.C., and most recently a large mural for the new Denver airport. Mr. Broer will replace Midge Sweley, who resigned, and his appointment will be in effect until 10/31/97. 3. EXHIBITS: Memorandum from Mayor White 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Mayor White (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended RE EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 3D MEMORANDUM TO: JUDY WOODS, CITY COUNCIL PRESIDENT CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: JIM WHITE, MAYOR DATE: APRIL 25, 1994 SUBJECT: APPOINTMENT TO KENT ARTS COMMISSION I have recently appointed Roger Broer to serve as a member of the Kent Arts Commission. Mr. Broer is a career artist (painter sculptor, mixed -media and printmaker) and is the author of our "We Are All Related" mural on the east wall of the First Interstate Bank at First and Meeker. He has done many public art projects including a project at the Department of Interior headquarters in Washington, D.C., and most recently a large mural for the new Denver Airport. Mr. Broer will replace Midge Sweley, who resigned, and his appointment will be in effect until 10/31/97. I submit this for your confirmation. J W:j b 1. SUBJECT: �/o Kent City Council Meeting Date May 3, 1994 Category Consent Calendar RIVERBEND PROPOSED 1994 BUYOUT FUND PROJECTS AND IMPROVEMENTS 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Approval of an $81,204 expenditure and budget change for projects and improvements at Riverbend Golf Complex, as recommended by the Golf Advisory Board, Parks Department Staff, and Parks Committee at its April 5, 1994 meeting (3-0). 3. EXHIBITS: Proposed 1994 Buyout Fund Projects and Improvements 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Golf Advisory Board Parks Department Staff, Parks Committee (3-0) (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. rip 7. UNBUDGETED FISCAL /PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember DISCUSSION: ACTION: seconds Council Agenda Item No. 3E CITY OF KENT RIVERBEND GOLF COMPLEX PROPOSED 1994 BUY OUT FUND PROJECTS AND IMPROVEMENTS PREPARED FOR: PATRICE THORELL ACTING PARKS DIRECTOR PREPARED BY: R. D. "PETE" PETERSEN JR. GOLF COMPLEX SUPERINTENDENT REVISED APRIL 1, 1994 PROPOSED 1994 BUY OUT FUND PROJECTS AND IMPROVEMENTS DES R PTION PRIORITY C T TI ATE 1 GOLF COMPLEX MASTER PLAN $15,000.OD - ESTABLISH A FIVE YEAR FACILITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN - MINI PUTT FACILITY DESIGN AND RENOVATIONS - DRIVING RANGE FACILITY REDESIGN AND RENOVATIONS - GOLF COURSE IMPROVEMENTS SEE ATTACHED OUTLINE -PAGE 4 2 KIRBY YARDAGE MARKERS $5,625.00 - EASY TO FIND YARDAGE MARKERS - SPEEDS UP PLAY - WILL INCREASE NUMBER OF ROUNDS TEE TIMES EACH DAY EQUALS $50,000.00/YR. - TWO ADDITIONAL 3 YARDAGE MARKERS LOCATED ON TEES $475.00 - WILL HELP SPEED UP PLAY - INDICATES YARDAGE OF HOLES - HELPFUL ON PAR 3's FOR CLUB SELECTION 4 DRIVING RANGE REPAIRS - NETTING AND GATE REPAIRS $2250.00 - IMPROVE SAFETY - REDUCE BALL LOSS . IMPROVE SECURITY . 5 TRIM I SURROUNDS MOWER $15,225.00 - IMPROVE MAINTENANCE PRACTICES - IMPROVED AESTHETICS - REDUCE COMPACTION AND TURF WEAR REPLACE GREENS MOWERS - OUT OF BUDGET COSTS $3,950.00 6 - REDUCE COMPACTION - LONGER LIFE OF LIQUID COOLED ENGINE - HYDRAULIC LEAK WARNING SYSTEM (SHOULD BE ASSUMED BY EQUIPMENT RENTALS) INCREASE WIDTH OF CART PATHS IN HIGH TRAFFIC AREAS $10,000.00 7 - REDUCE COMPACTION IN CRITICAL AREAS - REDUCE TURF WEAR - INCREASE TRAFFIC FLOW g INSTALLATION OF EXTRUDED CURBING $4,500.00 - REDUCE COMPACTION OF CRITICAL AREAS - IMPROVE TRAFFIC CONTROL - REDUCE TURF WEAR TEMPORARY DRIVING RANGE FIELD /TURF REPAIRS $5,000.00 9 - REDUCE MAINTENANCE COSTS - IMPROVE AESTHETICS - REDUCE BALL LOSS BUY OUT FUND . PAGE 2 PROPOSED BUY OUT FUND - CONTINUED.... PRIORITY DESCRIPTION COST ESTIMATE 10 CAB FOR JACOBSEN UTILITY VEHICLE $1,650.00 - IMPROVED SAFETY - INCREASED UTILIZATION OF VEHICLE 11 TEE MATS $1,280.00 - REDUCED WEAR ON TEES DURING WET TIMES - IMPROVED TEEING AREAS FOR PEEK PLAY TIMES - ALLOWS FOR MAINTENANCE AND REPAIRS TO BE PERFORMED 12 GARBAGE CANS $3,075.00 - IMPROVED AESTHETICS - IMPROVED LITTER CONTROL 13 SOD NURSERY $2,000.00 - ESTABLISH AN AREA TO GROW TOP QUALITY SOD - EASE OF MAINTENANCE PROJECTS - INCREASED ABILITY TO REPAIR DAMAGED TURF AREAS 14 SCORE BOARD $2,500.00 - IMPROVE SERVICE FOR TOURNAMENTS - AID IN SCORING TOURNAMENTS 15 GOLF COMPLEX MAINTENANCE / REPAIR FUND $8,674.00 - REMAINING BALANCE OF BUY OUT FUND TO BE ALLOCATED FOR UNFORESEEN MAINTENANCE / REPAIRS OF THE GOLF COMPLEX - TO COVER COST OVERRUNS OF BUY OUT PROJECTS - REMAINING BALANCE OF COMPLETED BUY OUT PROJECTS WILL BE PLACED IN THIS FUND TOTAL AMOUNT OF BUY OUT FUNDS AVAILABLE $81,204.00 TOTAL COST OF PROJECTS AND IMPROVEMENTS $81,204.00 BUY OUT FUND - PAGE 3 OUTLINE PROPOSED FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS MASTER PLAN PROPOSED MASTER PLAN: OUTLINE 1 GOLF COMPLEX FACILITY ANALYSIS 2 MARKET ANALYSIS 3 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES 4 SELECTION OF DESIGN TEAM MEMBERS 5 DEVELOPMENT OF THE MASTER PLAN A MINI PUTT DESIGN AND RENOVATION PLAN 1 ROUTING DESIGN OF COURSE 2 LANDSCAPING PLAN 3 LIGHTING PLAN 4 OVERHEAD COVER DESIGN B DRIVING RANGE FACILITY REDESIGN AND RENOVATION PLAN 1 BUILDING /STRUCTURE DESIGN 2 RANGE / FIELD DESIGN 3 [RRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN (TURF) 4 LANDSCAPING PLAN C PAR 3 GOLF COURSE RENOVATION PLAN 1 GOLF COURSE IMPROVEMENTS 2 FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS 3 IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN 4 LANDSCAPING PLAN D 18 HOLE GOLF COURSE IMPROVEMENT PLAN 1 GOLF COURSE IMPROVEMENTS 2 FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS 3 LANDSCAPING PLAN E MAINTENANCE FACILITY 1 ANALYSIS OF NEEDS 2 ESTABLISH A TIME LINE F GOLF COMPLEX PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE / REPAIR FUND 1 DETERMINE ANNUAL COST OF FACILITY REPAIRS 2 ESTABLISH A PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE 3 BUDGET FOR NON -EQUIPMENT RENTAL EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 4 BUDGET FOR FUTURE REPLACEMENT COSTS BUY OUT FUND - PAGE 4 Pr bwC-� s� � VO '//11 ent City Council Meeting Date May 3. 1994 Category Consent Calendar �I au, " ..-LVERBEND PROPOSED 1994 GREENS FEE SCHEDULE 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Approval of proposed 1994 Riverbend Greens Fee Schedule as recommended by the Parks Committee (3-0) at its April 5, 1994 meeting. This proposal follows the staff recommended fee increase schedule with the addition of a special discount for City residents. The discount is $.50 below 1993 greens fee rates. 3. EXHIBITS: Memo regarding proposed 1994 Greens Fee Schedule staff recommendations and Riverbend Golf Complex - proposed 1994 Greens Fee Schedule 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Parks Committee (3-0) (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember, DISCUSSION: ACTION: econds Council Agenda Item No. 3F CITY OF KENT PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT Memorandum JP -0 TO: Mayor White and Kent City Council Members FROM: Patrice Thorell, Acting Parks Director � �01, DATE: April 12, 1994 SUBJECT: PROPOSED 1994 RIVERBEND GREENS FEE SCHEDULE The Parks Department is currently working on a Riverbend Golf Complex 5 Year Capital Plan. Over the past year, the Golf Advisory Board has given extensive input to the components of such a plan. The Parks Department intends that the Capital Plan be funded by golf complex profits generated through fee increases. The attached Proposed 1994 Greens Fee Schedule represents recommendations made by City Administration and the Parks Committee. Initially the Parks Department recommended that the fee increases take effect May 1, 1994. Due to situations arising from the termination of Mr. Keith Sanden, S.S.M.D. Enterprises, Inc., we recommend postponing approval of 1994 Riverbend Greens Fee Schedule until such time as the new Director of Golf has been approved and the Riverbend Golf Complex 5 Year Capital Plan is completed. City Administration recommends a simplified across-the-board fee increase for all users due to the following program administration issues: 1) The development of Riverbend Golf Complex was funded with revenue bonds - the City of Kent is responsible to revenue bond holders, not City of Kent residents, for bond repayment; 2) There currently are unresolved accounting issues regarding contractor cashiering operations- the Finance Division is concerned that additional account collection monitoring problems will surface, further impacting City staff time; 3) A two tiered fee system has been thoroughly investigated and evaluated by the Parks Department, and rejected due to enforcement complications and additional staffing costs. Identification and assessment of fees for Kent residents vs. individuals with Kent addresses will require enhanced management of customer service procedures, e.g. identification of individuals with Kent addresses who consider themselves Kent residents; individuals with Kent addresses who want to pay for non-resident customers will be required to show group identification. Customers will be inconvenienced due to delays at the check-in counter; 4) Tournament fee policy will need additional review. These issues will impact staff time and potentially necessitate the need for additional staff to process City resident fees. O .a O N m Q i CD (D m 0 A 7 :a Q� ,) O m O A y n 7 h m CD a W X CD O. C tD x cn o w t g m w i w TMM m N 0 0 m 0 x0 O mD0 r r r N x D�NN NN N Z r Z 0 N m " 1 N U) N D m Z •N-1 D O -n C- Z Z D Z -o N -i Z J] " 1 O p D z r m t7 O m D N p N D o N N D N m v i -i -i to m c x o c n D n o z x o (1) -Zi m x Z � c m D c D O z N � m N Z m 'i m N O W m x m i N N i N N N i i i W N Q) O W i N N i O O W 1 CA O to Z A N Ul GI O O � O O Cl) V) v i Z -` i W j Z O) O i 0 0 tii9 i i c0 U) o W Z 0 O W N LT, Z Om ..r c o o om o 0 o !n N O m 00 44 -10 JJ 0 N c(D NO" Z i Z z i o i 0 0 1 00 m c c o m O O o o C m o z O •D-1 m N D MO co i N 1 cD w cn i Ln i i i i O O O W /N) \/ N O m w oo c o c o 0 0 o U) D mN O .a O N m Q i CD (D m 0 A 7 :a Q� ,) O m O A y n 7 h m CD a W X CD O. C tD v O O N CD a CD i L/ CD O a) T (D O N n CD Q C (D 00O o W W * 2 2 2 m 2 2Z 2 O O m Z i O --I O O 0 0 0 Or O r m m m Z n L NN N Z N N N N N p m D N n O 2 m Z v N N D m -I D O -i 2 O m -Ni D L D M X .N.� NZi z v p 77 0 2 v O ^ m m n 2 v g 2 D g Z m O N 2 O N M 0 D N N N v u' N m z v°° o o o m 0 N N C C m D C D z N Z z m -zi m m N 07 co CO ,a O N A co A N a)i V m fn W 1 p N t0 AO o O O Z A o Lq � Lq w o U o C N -rA Lo C7 1 i N i V 4A A A UltA i� i 1 j Zl i 1 i Di i i � N z W W O O �" Z 07 o <O 0 o O m w co� °.' N O cn o m w O c c O m Cl) W A 4 C cn O O O 1 i i i co O W Jv W V O iv m Z O N O i A i fn Z O 1 v i C N cn D m W co W o O N N O N m O O O (M O O C v v i N O A O O O m m N D 2 20 w co � i i O W ON v Qi Ln i i i N i m V O O 0o M V O V Cl W W CO (wj O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C p v w V 1 O O O 31 O O O O O A O mmN m v O O N CD a CD i L/ CD O a) T (D O N n CD Q C (D n Kent City Council Meeting Date May 3. 1994 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: HARDSHIP CASE - CHARGE IN LIEU OF ASSESSMENT 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works Committee, and in accordance with Resolution No. 975, authori- zation for the Finance Manager to execute the necessary documents allowing Mr. Richard A. Kerkel of 26405 122nd Place S.E. to make monthly payments against a $632.50 Charge in Lieu of Assessment fee for water service. Mr. Kerkel has claimed that paying the full amount at this time would create a hardship. 4 5. 20 7. EXHIBITS: Public Works Director memorandum, Mr. Kerkel's letter and Public Works Minutes RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO_� YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended_ EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 3G DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS APRIL 25, 1994 TO: Public Works Co ittee FROM: Don Wickstrom D RE: Hardship Case - Charge in Lieu of Assessment Fee The Public Works Department has received a request from Richard A. Kerkel of 26405 122nd Pl S.E., to make monthly payments against a Charge in Lieu of Assessment fee for water connection. The fee is $632.50 and as explained in the attached letter, Mr. Kerkel has claimed this would create a hardship for him in connecting to City water. By Resolution 1975, Council can authorize deferred payment in lieu of assessments. ACTION: Recommend that in accordance with Resolution #975, Council authorize that installment payments be made to the City of Kent by Richard Kerkel for the $632.50 Charge in Lieu of Assessment fee. Don Wickstront Department of Public Works 220 4th Ave. So. Kent, Wa 98032 Dear Sir: March 30, 1994 Richard Kerkel 26405 122nd pt. S.E. Kent, Wa 98031 CITY OF KENS r,PR 11410-94 ENGINEERING DEPT. On March 30,1994 when applying for a nater permit for Tax Lot number 282205-9242-06 I was informed that there was a latecomer's fee in the amount of P3 -l- 5-17 Since this was in addition to the fees and costs I had expected, I am requesting to have a monthly payment plan. These fees payable now would create a hardship on me hooking up to, city water, and the operators of the community system have given me notice to disconnect. Additionally, I would like to know if it would be possible to find some way to finance the System Development Charge over a short term since I was given very short notice to disconnect. I am a single parent with one child, I have a salary of approximately $1,600 per month plus child support of $143 per month. My expenses areas follows: $777.00 for mortgage, $180.00 for utilities, $380.00 for daycare, S250.00 for gas and food and insurance, $50.00 for attorney costs. Additionally, I drive a 1982 Chevrolet Cavalier that is in need of tires, shocks and a nen clutch. At this point, I must either find a nay to finance the cost of installing the water or quite simply I will not be able to have any running water in my house. Any assistance you can give me in this matter will be greatly appreciated. If you need any additional information please inform me as soon as possible. Thank you very much. Sincerely, Richard A. Kerkel PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE APRIL 25, 1994 PRESENT: PAUL MANN DON WICKSTROM TIM CLARK TOM BRUBAKER JIM BENNETT MR & MRS RUST Hardship Case (Richard Kerkel 26405 122nd P1 SE) - Charge in Lieu of Assessment Wickstrom said there are three or four houses on a community well on 122nd P1. S.E. and apparently the owner of the well wants the others to establish their own water service. He said that Mr. Kerkel has claimed this is presenting a hardship for him. He wants to connect to city water however, there is a charge in lieu of assessment in the amount of $632.50. Wickstrom said that we concur that he be granted a hardship and be allowed to pay this assessment over a period of time. Committee unanimously recommended that Council authorize that installment payments be made to the City by Richard Kerkel for the $632.50 charge in lieu of assessment fee. Sidewalks - Status Wickstrom stated that Bennett had requested a status update on the sidewalk funding. He said we have just released one major contract to R. E. Bailey Construction. Wickstrom referred to a map in the Committee's packet which indicated the different areas where Bailey will be working in the downtown core. He said there will also be a second phase, of approximately one-quarter million dollars, to be done in the Fall. With the street vacation money, we will be taking care of the existing pedestrian pathway problems such as in the areas of Sequoia Jr. High and Park Orchard Elementary. Wickstrom said that there is an issue with Carnaby Way sidewalks. Staff had a residential meeting to discuss neighborhood traffic control and it was mentioned that we are going to install sidewalks on Carnaby Way which is associated with Star Lake Elementary and Totem Jr. High. He said there is an older plat adjacent to the school that has everything except sidewalks. Wickstrom said we were going to put in sidewalks at no expense to the homeowner however, there was some concern raised from one property owner with extensive landscaping, who objects to the sidewalks. Wickstrom f Kent City Council Meeting Date May 3 1994 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: POLICE OFFICE TECHNICIAN II - AUTHORIZATION 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Authorization for a Police Office Technician II position. This position is needed to assist in the accreditation process the Kent Police Department is currently working on. The position will be moved from temporary part-time to regular part-time so that hours of work can be increased to meet project timelines of completion by December 1995. 3. EXHIBITS: None 4. RECOMMENDED BY: O erations Committee 4/27/94 (3-0) (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES X FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended ✓ 6. EXPENDITURE RE9UIRED: approximately $10,000 increase SOURCE OF FUNDS: Criminal Justice Funds 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION• Council Agenda Item No. 3H Kent City Council Meeting V Date Ma v 3 1994 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH CITY OF DES MOINES RL 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Authorization for the Mayor to sign an interlocal agreement with the City of Des Moines regarding Midway Crossing. This interlocal agreement is related to the Midway Crossing Neighborhood Shopping Center which is divided by the boundary of Kent and Des Moines with the majority of Midway Crossing residing in Kent. This agreement outlines the understanding between the two cities on sales and utility taxes and surface water management charges, maintenance and capital issues and amends the original interlocal entered into in 1987. 3. lit. (a W � Y-� i�'G•� 4. 7 -ffl Kgu.� - baa /Viorr�(.�fa� l�l SCt�� YES 5• mmended ✓ 6. seconds U)" - DISCI ACTI( Council Agenda Item No. 31 FROM: CITY OF DES MOINES TO:CITY OF KENT RPR 25, 1994 10:31PM INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT In accordance with the Interlocal Cooperation Act (chapter 39.34 RCW), the City of Kent ("Kent") and the City of Des Moines ("Des Moines") agree as follows: Facts and Assumptions This agreement is entered into on the basis of the following facts and assumptions: 1. The real property which is the subject of this interlocal agreement is the Midway Crossing Neighborhood Shopping Center ("Midway Crossing") which is generally located at the southwest corner of Pacific Highway South and the Kent - Des Moines Road (SR -516), 2. The boundary of Kent and Des Moines passes ir a generally cast/west line through the southern portion of Midway Crossing. The majority of Midway Crossing is in Kent. With the exception of the QFC Supermarket, all structures in the Midway Crossing are in Kent. 3. While the majority of the floor area of the QFC Supermarket is in Des Moines, eight of the nine checkout stands are in Kent. The Washington State Department of Revenue takes the position that sales taxes are collected at the "point of sale", which means that Des Moines is entitled to sales tax revenue solely from sales occurring at one specific checkout stand. 4. Kent and Des Moines each impose a business and occupation tax for the privilege of conducting certain utility businesses in their respective cities. It is awkward to create ratios by which the various utilities may apportion this tax between Kent and Des Moines with respect to utility usages at the QFC Supermarket. 5. The topography in the vicinity of Midway Crossing is such that surface water drains to the west towards the Massey Creek drainage basin, which is in Des Moines. Funds from the Des Moines surface water management program will be expended to deal with the quantity and quality of surface water runoff from the impermeable areas of Midway Crossing. 6, Kent and Des Moines have previously entered into an interlocal agreement dated March 17, 1987, which is appended to this agreement as Attachment "A". The 1987 agreement deals with building sites that may be located within both the jurisdiction of Kent and the jurisdiction of Des Moines, and provides for lead agency status. Des Moines agrees that Kent is the lead agency for Midway Crossing. 7. While the 1987 agreement deals with a number of development issues for real property lying within the jurisdictions of both Kent and Des Moines, it fails to address issues of taxation and surface water management. 8. Representatives of Des Moines and Kent met at the request of Stan Finkelstein, Executive Director of the Association of Washington Cities, for the purpose of arriving at a resolution of taxation issues related to Midway Crossing. A representative of the Washington State Department of Revenue was present at the meeting. Kent and Des Moines were in general agreement that taxation should flow to the municipal corporation which essentially provides municipal services for Midway Crossing, and that in arriving at an understanding, the municipalities should avoid hypertechnical tt696 P.02 FROM: CITY OF DES MOINES TO:CITY OF KENT Kent/Des Moines Interlocal Agreement Midway Crossing Neighborhood Shopping Center Page 2 APR 25, 1994 10:32RM #896 P.03 considerations (such as the location of a particular cash re4ister) in order to arrive at an understanding which will provide equity to both municipalities. Agreement WHEREFORE-, in reference to the foregoing, the parties agree as follows: (1) Sales Tax and Utility Tax. With respect to municipal sales tax and utility tax revenue attributable to the QFC Supermarket: (a) Sales Tax. Des Moines agrees that Kent is entitled to the benefit of municipal revenue of all sales taxes collected at the QFC Supermarket, and that the Washington State Department of Revenue should be instructed to code all such sales for the benefit of Kent. (b) Utilily Tax. Des Moines agrees to waive its right to collect any utility occupation tax imposed as a business and occupation tax for the privilege of engaging in the business of electric enemy, natural gas, telephone, solid waste collection, and transmitting television or audio services. Kent shall be entitled to collect its equivalent of these taxes on the premises. (2) Annual Payment to Des Moines. Kent agrees to pay annually to the City of Des Moines an amount equal to one -ninth (1/9th) of all actual revenues received arising out of retail sales at the QFC Supermarket which are authorized by chapter 82.14 RCW. The first payment will be made on or about March 31, 1995 for revenue collected by Kent from April 1, 1994, and annual payments will be made by Kent on or about March 31 of each subsequent year. (3) Surface Water Management Charges, Maintenance, Capital Issues. (a) SWM Charges. Kent agrees to remit to Des Moines annually an amount equal to all the maintenance and operation portion of its surface water management service charge revenue collected from the Midway Crossing property owner, effective April 1, 1994_ Annual payments are made on or about March 31st of each year. The first payment is made on March 31, 1995. (b) eration & Maintenance. Des Moines is responsible for the operation'and maintenance of the public portion of the surface water management system within the Midway Crossing property. (c) Basin -related C_qWJgLLjsues. Kent and Des Moines agree to cooperate in meeting basin -related surface water management capital issues pertaining to the Midway Crossing. (4) Hold harmless. Des Moines agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold Kent, its officers, officials, agents, employees, and volunteers harmless from any claim, damages, suit, action, or liability, costs or expenses in law or equity, including attorney fees and expenses in defending against any such claim because of damaged property or personal injury arising out of the operation and maintenance of the public portion of the surface water management system within the Midway Crossing property, which may be occasioned by any willful or negligent act or omission of Des Moines or any agent, FROM: CITY OF DES MOINES TO:CITY OF KENT Kent/Des Moines Interlocal Agreenlent Midway Crossing Neighborhood Shopping Center Page 3 APR 25, 1994 10:33AM #696 P.04 servant, employee, or subcontractor of Des Moines, except at the extent such injury is caused by the negligent or willful misconduct of Kent, its directors, officers, agents, servants, or employees. (5) Effective Date. This agreement, and all entitlements hereunder, are effective April 1, 1994, APPROVED S TO FORM this La, day of , 1994. 14 APPROVED AS TO FORM this day of _ _ _ , 1994. B C Attorney of Kent CONTkACT:MID WAYCR/92-185 4/20/94 DATED this25-A day of ?2Z;, , 1994. CITY OF DES MOINES, Is � pager .� By di on of the Des Moines City CourW, taken April 14, 1994. DATED this day of 11994. CITY OF KENT By Its Mayor By direction of the Kent City Council, taken 1994. FROM: CITY OF DES MOINES TO:CITY OF KENT APR 25, 1994 12:34AM 4896 P.06 ' Sect o 4_ Fe" -a, Whore permits or approvals are raViicd by one rordoipality and not the other, the daveloper rhall be responsible to the particular municipality for payment of fees as if this agreewmnt did not exist. When sudr permiL•s or apptwals are required by both nnurcipalities, the developer will be rrspor ,W14a solely to the lead agency for payment of fees. All fees collected by the lead agency shall be designated as "Interlocal Agrrw:r_nt raad Agency Permit Foa Fund." Disbursements to the City of Kent aro City of Des Moines shall be made pursuant to their established legislative and administrative policies respectively. Bold Harmless, She lead agcuyy shall defend and hold the non -lead agency, its elected officers, employees and agents harmless and shall ir4emnify such persons fz.= and against all losses, Claims, demarxis, suits, actions, pa rents, judgerrants and any and all other expanses, legal " othenuise, incurred by the non -lead agency in defense of any suit or claim as a result of any actions or non -actions by any personnel of the lead agency pursuant to this agrceny37t, fL •ion G. germination. This Agreement shall be effective for a period not to exceed forty (40) years unless otherwise extended or tatminated by either City upon ninety (90) days written notice: of one party to the other party. IN WIIN= THEPMF, the Parties their adherence to this interlocal agree:mrrt is evidenced by the following signatures. City of Dez Moines Luted: February [i, 190 --�`= X C. ;/r BY: Stan McNutt, City Manages Attest: ty Clerk Dated: Attest: 427P -23P ATTACHMENT "A" Page 2 of 2 - 2 - ,City, of •�t� fL BY. FROM: CITY OF DES MOINES TO:CITY OF KENT APR 25, 1994 10:33AM #896 P.05 }arrERMCAT, Ac srgrtrsrr RISS A4T2EF2MC is entered into batween the City of Ids Moines ar�d the City of Kent, municipal corporations. {JIM'AS, the boundaries of the City of. Des Moines and the City of Kent are contiguous west of pacific Highway South between the Kent-D:,s Moine„ Ij-\qd and South 252ro1 Street, ctrl MIERF.AS, building sites rmy be located within both jurisdictions, and WKWEAS, a policy is needed to provide for orderly processing o2: licenses and permits vAnere dual jurisdiction occurs, Now, zlMnr+E, it is hereby agreed between the parties as follows: a. when a building site is located both in the City of Kent arzl the City of Des Moines, a lead agency will be determined, Rhe load agency will have primary responsibility for coordinating development reviews, conducting plan checks aril building inspections, and collecting anal distributing permit fees as provided below. b. Lead agency status will be determined pi<ysuant to WAC 197-11-932, i.e., the lead agency shall ba that municipality vtlthin whose Jurisdiction is located the greatest portion of the proposed project area, as zreasurod in square fast, S99kion 2.• R velgra nt Feview a. A joint develo Rt review will be e;[Ployed to work out minimum setbacks and other zoning requirements, required landscaping, etc. A preliminary. review shall be held to define such developmental constraints. A final review and joint approval of site plan features shall be required prior to acceptance of the building permit application. The lead agency shall be responsible for corpliar2co with the State Dwirotmiental policy Act, as amerzed, RCW 43.21C. b. For permits and approvals under the jurisdialaon of a discretionary board of a municipality, when such permits or approvals are required by cine municipality but not the other, such permits or approvals shd11 be obtained prior to final site plan approval. the m rdcipality requiring any aPPrOval and/or permit shall incorporate the reocmz= cations of the other no.unicipality in its staff report to tha deciding municipality. C. For permits and approvals which are not subject to the discretionary review of a m24icipality as described in Section 2.b, but are the subject of administrative determination, and such permits or approvals are rNuired by one runicipality c",ftequeent to final site lean at roval b the other, not the d a shall he Obtained P PP Y gency. Sure such pe.. -mins or approvals are required by both m2nicipalities, the lead agency shall have exclusive authority and responsibility for granting the permit or approval in accordance with the ordinances of the lead agency, including assessment of any fees. rrzt. A2 case d. discrepancy zoning ywpi rJnents of each jurisdiction shall to Fancy between zoning provisions of the City of Des Moires and the City of Kent, the more stringent regulations, as determined by the lead agency, shall apply. Section 3. w^321Qss Licenses., Business licenses shall be secured from the lead agency, who is responsible for notifying the secondary agency when a change in business use is proposed. No business license shall be issued without havirg secured zoningybuildirWfire code compliance from both municipalities or agencies. ! NAR 3 ATTACHMENT "A" Page 1 of 2 FROM: CITY OF DES MOINES TO:CITY OF KENT FPR 25, 1«4 :-4�4P'^ #esti F.�6 sect o 4_ Pe -j Mara permits or approvals are required by one myuricipality and not: the other, the dovelq-shall be trsponsibin to the particular m micit&lity for payment of fees as if this agreemnt did not exist. When sudr px--mWq or approvals am rOTAred by both nw:ciluliiies, the developer will be responsible, solely to the lead agency for payment of fees. All fees cellected by the lead agency shall be designated as "Interlocal Agrcenrnt Lead Agency permit Fea Mind." Disbursements to the City of bent and City OC Des Moinas sluxll be made pursuant to their established legislative and administrative policies respeCtively. �g ior. S. Hold Iiarm7 a 5. 471e lead agency shall defend and hold the non -lead agency, its elected officers, mVloyeos and agents harmless aril shall indmlify such persons from and against all losses, Claims, demands, suits, actions, payments, judgements and any and all other expenses, legal and otherwise, inured by the non -lead agency in defense of any suit or claim as a result of any actions or non -actions by any personnel of the lead agency lxrrsuant to this agreement. Lc!gjLion G. amination This Agrea=t shall be affective for a period not to exceed forty (40) years unless otherwise wtar4od or tarmimted by either City upon ninety (90) days written notice of one party to the other party. TH wrxrmsS TKmWF, the patties their adherence to this interlocal agree:rent is evidenced by the follc;4LV signatures. City of Dez Moines cataj: February 27, lyay g'/l r By: Stan Mr-\utt, City Manager Attest: g Clerk Dated: 3/'7/5 7 Attest: Dy: 427r-231` ATTACHMENT "A" Page 2 of 2 MW= City, of FROM: CITY OF DES MOINES TO:CITY OF KENT .21 urs ADMINISTRATION 21630 11TH AVENUE SOUTH DES MOINES, WASHINGTON 28198-8398 (200) 878.4505 FAX: (200) 670-6540 VV FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL LETTER FAX # (206)870-6540 DATE: PLEASE DELIVER THE ACCOMPANYING MATERIAL TO: NAME: 2 0 & L CA /5 6 V, c --I-/ -- -r y Alt- 7- 7z�ltf AJJ 4( -E -v, Telephone: M/S: FAX # y 5-cl 5 3 FROM: Telephone: ( TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING THIS LETTER; ITEMS/NOTE: C� I CA-\. IF YOU HAVE ANY PROBLEMS RECEIVING.PLEASE CALL: NAME —S--- � bt-) r,(-f�-v`— NUMBER: rwaao nccyoj Paj- 970 1. SUBJECT: OPEN SPACE - BUDGET CHANGE Kent City Council Meeting Date May 3. 1994 Category Consent Calendar 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Authorization to adjust the Parkside Wetlands project budget from $230,000 to $235,721 incorporating interest income to this project per the open space agreement with King County. 3. EXHIBITS: Memorandums from May Miller and Helen Wickstrom 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Operations Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO v YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember DISCUSSION: ACTION: econds Council Agenda Item No. 3J MILLER,MAYENE / KENT70/FN - HPDesk print. ----------------------------------------- St act: BUDGET CHANGE - OPEN SPACE Creator: Mayene MILLER / KENT70/FN Dated: 04/19/94 at 1633. THE PARKS DEPARTMENT IS REQUESTING A BUDGET CHANGE TO ADJUST THE PARKSIDE WETLANDS PROJECT BUDGET FROM $230,000 TO $235,721. THIS IS A HOUSEKEEPING ADJUSTMENT THAT ADDS THE $5,721 OF INTEREST INCOME TO THIS PROJECT PER OUR OPEN SPACE AGREEMENT WITH KING COUNTY. THE FUNDS HAVE PRIMARILY BEEN USED FOR LAND AQUISITION. AN ANTICIPATED BALANCE OF $1,703 WILL BE USED FOR RETAINAGE OR ANOTHER OPEN SPACE PROJECT. COUNCIL IS ENCOURAGED TO AUTHORIZE -THE $5,721 BUDGET CHANGE FOR PARKSIDE WETLANDS. MILLER,MAYENE / KENT70/FN - HPDesk print. ----------------------------------------- MF ige. Dated: 03/09/94 at 0943. Su::,._ -pct: Budget Change for Parkside Wetlands Sender: Helen WICKSTROM / KENT70/PK Contents: 2. TO: Mayene MILLER /.KENT70/FN Part 1. TO: Mayene MILLER / KENT70/FN CC: Ramona FULTZ / KENT70/PK Patrice THORELL / KENT70/PK Part 2. Please take to the Operations Committee a request for a budget change for the Parkside Wetlands project to add the $5,721 in interest earned on investments. The account is P50-000-6110-611100. This would change the budget total from $230,000 to $235,721. Section 3 of our Interlocal Agreement with King Councy states that all funds and accrued interest therefrom will be accounted for separately from all other City funds. With the official budget change completed, we will have a project balance of $1,703. Please let me know if you need additional information or would like me to attend the Operations Committee. YI Kent City Council Meeting Date Mav 3 1994 Category Other Business 1. SUBJECT: HOURS OF OPERATION FOR LICENSED PREMISES - ORDINANCE 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: The proposed ordinance would amend Chapter 9.32 of the Kent City Code entitled "Conduct in Alcoholic Beverage Premises", by adding a new section regulating entertainment conducted on premises licensed to serve alcoholic beverages. tould �a2 Pio music, dancing, or entertainment -way be conducted between th)the hours of 2 a.m. and 6 a.m. on any premises licensed under e to405`�(� the authority of the State Liquor Control Board which is open �� to the public and which operates for profit, directly or from n indirectly, or requires a monetary payment persons admitted. 3. EXHIBITS: Ordinance 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Safety Committee 4/19/94 (2-1) (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL /PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YESNotReconunende I FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember 1A) anL�o moves, for the adoption of Ordinance tainment conducted on premises beverages. DISCUSSION: ACTION: Councilmember 9110-"' seconds No. 3) b3 regulating enter - licensed to serve alcoholic W Council Agenda Item No. 4A ere ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City Cou}cil of the City of Kent, Washington, amendirpig Chapter 9.32 of the Kent City Code enti led "Conduct in Alcoholic Beverage Premises', by adding a new section regulating entert inment conducted on premises licens d to serve alcoholic beverages. WHEREAS, the City Counci;/seeks to adopt the restrictions on hours of entertai*ent on premises licensed to serve liquor as authorized purs4nt to RCW 66.28.080 and WAC 314-16-055; and WHEREAS, excessive/'noise, traffic, public disturbances and other activity associated with the after hours operation of alcohol serving establishi�iOnts impacts the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens Of Kent; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COU tIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Chapter 9.32 of the Kent City Penal Code is hereby amended by adding a new section, 9.32.06, as follows: Sec 9.32.06. Entertainment - hours permitted. No music dancing or entertainment may be conducted between the hours of 2 a.m. and 6 a.m. on any premises licensed under the authority of the State Li uor Control Board which is open to the public and which operates for profit, directly or indirectly, or reciuires a monetary Payment or contribution from the Persons admitted. Dancing herein shall not be deemed a public dance under Chapter 5.12 of the Kent City ode which regulates certain public dances on premises not licensed under the authority of the State Liquor Control Board nor shall it include adult entertainment under Chapter 5.11 of the Kent City Code which is performed on premises not licensed under the authority of the State Liquor Control Board. Section 2. Severability. If any one or more sections, subsections or sentences of this chapter are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this chapter and the same shall remain in full force and effect. Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law. ATTEST: BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK E JIM WHITE, MAYOR APPROVED AS TO FORM: ROGER A. LUBOVICH, CITY ATTORNEY PASSED the day of 1994. da APPROVED the Y of , 1994. da PUBLISHED the Y of , 1994. I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No. , passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the City of Kent as hereon indicated. niteclub.ord 3 (SEAL) BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK eo , 9 , 32.06 . �nLercaa.iiu�cia� - uuui ss Cluti L LGu. Pursuant to RCW 66.28.080 and WAC 314-16-0551 no music dancing or entertainment may be conducted between the hours of 2 a.m. and 6 a.m. on any premises licensed under the authority of the State Liquor Control Board which is open to the public and which operates for profit directly or indirectly, or requires a monetary payment or contribution from the persons admitted "Dancing" herein shall not include a public dance under Chapter 5.12 of the Kent City Code which regulates certain public dances on premises not licensed under the authority of the State Liquor Control Board "Dancing" and "entertainment" herein shall not include adult entertainment under Chapter 5.11 of the Kent City Code which regulates adult entertainment performed on "M„cin” ani "antartainmPnt'" Section 2. Severability. If any one or more sections, subsections or sentences of this chapter are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this chapter and the same shall remain in full force and effect. Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law. JIM WHITE, MAYOR 2 %0 Kent City Council Meeting Date Mav 3 1994 Category Other Business 1. SUBJECT: SALE AND DISCHARGE OF FIREWORKS 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: The sale and use of fireworks has been the subject of much public debate over recent years. In the interest of preserving both the tradition of fireworks and public safety, and pursuant to RCW 70.77.395, the City of Kent has prepared an ordinance, restricting the time fireworks may be sold and limiting the time fireworks may be discharged. The Fire Prevention Bureau has notified all firework permit holders of 1993 of the proposed fireworks ordinance as requested by the Public Safety Committee. 3. EXHIBITS: Ordinance 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Safety Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended - 6. EXPENDITURE REOUIRED: $ None SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds to adopt Ordinance No. i -A restricting the time for sale of fireworks and limiting the time for discharge of fireworks. DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 4B ORDINANCE NO. V AN ORDINANCE of the City of Kent, Washington, restricting the time for sale of fireworks and limiting the time for discharge of fireworks. / WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 70.77.395 Od pursuant to the Washington Supreme Court decision, Brown v.Yakima, 116 Wn.2d. 556 (1991), the City has the authority to restrict the sale and discharge of fireworks; NOW, THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Recitals ncorporated. The foregoing recitals are by this reference incorporated herein and made a part hereof. Section 2. New Section. The following new section 13.05.015 shall be added to the Kent City Code: Sec. 13.05.015. Dates and Times Common Fireworks May be Discharged. Except as may be provided in Section 70.77.311 of the Revised Code of Washington, no common fireworks shall be sold abed -within the municipal limits of the City of Kent except from 12:00 Noon on the twenty-eighth day of June to 11:00 P.M. on the fourth day of July. No common fireworks may be discharged at any time except between the hours of 9:00 A.M. and 12:00 Midnight on the fourth day of July. 1 Section 3. Severability. The provisions of this ordinance are declared to be separate and severable. The invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section or portion of this ordinance, or the invalidity of the application thereof to any person or circumstances shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this ordinance, or the validity of its application to other persons or circumstances. Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days from the time of its final approval and passage as provided by law. ATTEST: BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: ROGER A. LUBOVICH, CITY ATTORNEY PASSED the day of JIM WHITE, MAYOR 19_ APPROVED the day of , 19_ PUBLISHED the day of 19_ I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of Ordinance No. passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the City of Kent hereon indicated. FIREWORK.psf BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK 2 Kent City Council Meeting Date May 3, 1994 Category Other Business 1. SUBJECT: COMPENSATION OF COUNCILMEMBERS - ORDINANCE 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: The proposed ordinance would amend Kent City Code Section 2.01.010, Compensation of Councilmembers, by increasing Councilmember salaries, providing for cost of living increases, and providing for medical benefits. 3. EXHIBITS: Memorandum from J. Brent McFall and ordinance 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Operations Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended No EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7. CITY COUNCIL_ ACTION: Councilmember �� moves, Councilmember uA ✓_seconds to adopt Ordinance No. �5 increasing Councilmember salaries, providing for cost of living increases, and providing for medical benefits. DISCUSSION:ka ACTION: -" r �-Council Agenda Item No. 4C DATE: April 27, 1994 TO: Jim White, Mayor Judy Woods, City Council President City Council Members FROM: J. Brent McFall SUBJECT: Council Compensation The Operations Committee has reviewed the matter of council compensation and recommends that the ordinance setting out compensation be amended to provide the following: - Effective on the effective date of the ordinance, councilmembers will receive medical insurance the same as that provided to city employees paid for by the city. A councilmember choosing to do so may cover his or her family at his or her own expense. - Effective January 1, 1998, council salaries will be established at $550 monthly, a $50 per month increase over current salaries. - Additionally, effective January 1, 1998, council salaries will be adjusted by 75% of the CPI -W, Seattle for July 1, 1996 to July 1, 1997. Each succeeding January 1, council salaries will be adjusted automatically by 75% of the CPI -W, Seattle July to July of the previous year. By waiting until January 1, 1998, for the effective date of the salary adjustments all council salaries will be adjusted at the same time avoiding the complications of having different salaries paid to different councilmembers. Staff concurs with the Committees recommendation and recommends adoption of the ordinance. JBM:kno ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, increasing council member salaries, providing for cost of living increases, and providing for medical benefits. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Kent City Code Chapter 2.01 "City Council" is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 2.01.010. Compensation of council members. A. Pursuant to the provisions of RCW 35A.12.070 each city council member shall be paid a salary of five hundred dollars ($500.00) per month. Effective January 1 1998, each city council member shall be paid a salary of five hundred fifty dollars ($550.00) per month Additionally, effective January 1998 council member salaries shall be adjusted by 75% of the Consumer Price Index -W (Seattle) for July 1 1996 to July 1, 1997 Each succeeding January 1 council member salaries shall be adjusted by 75° of the Consumer Price Index -W (Seattle) for the period of July to July of the previous year. The duly elected president of the city council shall be paid an additional salary of one hundred dollars ($100.00) per month in addition to the regular council member salary. This additional salary shall not be subject to Consumer Price Index adjustments as set forth herein. 1 B. Each council member may receive medical insurance covera e benefits for himself or herself as is'Provided to full time employees of the citY. Additionall each council member may, at his or her expense elect to obtain medical insurance covera e benefits for his or her family as is provided pursuant to city policy. Sec. 2.01.020. City council meetings. The regular and other meetings of the city council shall be held in the council chambers at the city hall unless otherwise designated by majority of the city council at a regular or special meeting. The regular meetings shall be held on the first and third Tuesday of each month. Special meetings shall be held as provided by law at such times as may be designated. Regular meetings shall convene at 7:00 p.m. If any such day of G regular meeting is a legal holiday, the meeting shall be held on the following day at the same hour. Section 2. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance. Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law. JIM WHITE, MAYOR ON ATTEST: BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: ROGER A. LUBOVICH, CITY ATTORNEY PASSED day of APPROVED day of PUBLISHED day of 1994. 1994. 1994. I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No. passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the City of Kent as hereon indicated. cnclmem.ord BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK 3 (SEAL) 1 McFall: this has to do with the proposed ramstead annexation. Wic:: showed a map of the ramstead annexation which is presently before the boundary review board. 594 acres. what is of concern to auburn is this finger taht is 18 acres still owned by mrs. ramstead. it's part of the annexation. our sphere of interest included the area plus the area tothe south aand auburns did the same sp w sp so we have overlapping concerns from both us and auburn . the po proposal and what we are asking for is at least concept of a proposed agreement, or approval of a concept and we'd work out the details is that the annexxation we received under the law you can exchange properties within the city limits like we did with seatacc regarding the park n ride lot and their park on the west hill. it's just a matterofcoucnil passing a resolutions between each s jurisdictions. there sum subject to a referendum by the people if they object. auburn is receptive tothis, we just have to work outthe details. it may work,it may not. white: we are making the first move,and auburn will react? wick they have already reacted, we're just iin a quasi -=agreement, it's just a matter of working out the details and what we'd like from council is to concur with executing such an agreement and authorizing the mayor to sign such oncewe we work out those details. white: what do you want the council to approve? Wic: just authoprize themayor to sign an agreement HeLa relating to the ramstead annexation with a possible future modifiction of the boundaries. bennett somoved, woods seconded, mtn crd. Kent City Council Meeting Date May 3 1994 Category Bids 1. SUBJECT: GREEN RIVER LEVEE IMPROVEMENTS 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Bid opening for this project was held April 26th with nine bids received. The low bid was submitted by Lloyd Enterprises, Inc. in the amount of $272,010.31. The engineer's estimate was $326,034.55. The project consists of constructing a section of new levee and raising portions of the existing levee along the northerly bank of the Green River from approximately the Meeker Street Bridge to the West Valley Highway bridge. Also included is the installation of a paved pedestrian/bicycle trail along the top of same. The Public Works Director has recommended that this bid be accepted and the contract awarded to Lloyd Enterprises, Inc. 3. EXHIBITS: Public Works Director memorandum 4. 5. 20 RECOMMENDED BY: — (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commiss FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: SOURCE OF FUNDS: NO ✓ YES Not Recommended 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember �A�kAIV moveJ, C rfcilmember �' seconds that the Green River Levee Improvement contract be awarded to Lloyd Enterprises, Inc. for �he� i� amount � � $272,010-31. Ci �e nv\eii Secov\Jecl aA r to vw DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 5A DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS MAY 31 1994 TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Don Wickstrom RE: Green River Levee Improvements Bid opening was April 26th with nine bids received. The low bid was submitted by Lloyd Enterprises in the amount of $272,010.31. It is recommended by the Public Works Director that this bid be accepted and the contract awarded to Lloyd Enterprises, Inc. BID SUMMARY Lloyd Enterprises, Inc. $272,010.31 Gary Merlino Construction $318,729.23 Golf Landscaping $320,230.67 R.E. Bailey Construction $332,723.87 Ceccanti, Inc. $342,369.90 Gaston Bros. Excavating $349,391.74 Tri-State Construction $350,044.85 Glacier Construction Company $353,091.01 R. W. Scott Construction $374,598.93 Engineer's Estimate $326,034.55 Aq _ 'l J V N IL O N O~ 'W 43RD ." b n r blT, y Z ~ P , 43RD Aq + I�_ iLa�� .,Clf�./!1f tSIH RCaTH Ln 4: 44TH •.S t� 'AYE RD Dron ..•�, .. 4 H a 2 45TH AMC f 45TH PL S -' 7 AVE 3 S 'rc VOlMH3; z 'V �'r/�.: r •.. S OVOn O FRAOER T Sy N N r V NNJ r%jLo — rn RUSS t ` I O O =c CA O p �J J O / 1 i D o N ` � P 51TH AVE S _ FRAOER ROAD F..3 FSI � 0 N ~ N N W N y C/ r r W L /Mi rs W AVE S V) A v \/ n> i S S WASHINGTON AVE 4 _ S ifpff rn � g TN N 6TH ,yVPSON O Aron N N LINCOLN AV S NAD[N AVE ? �.• N MA SON AVE r IF ]AV H1►L -� S -•—--3dF11 A 1 4zrt S 6TH S-' STH AVE ,� AVESTN '�>4 1' n AVE •.a' - r _ n N '� \ vu - •) AVE r S STM AVE } CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS A. A. Ei C. 10 E. R E P O R T S COUNCIL PRESIDENT -)it l LA L OPERATIONS COMMITTEE ----) ll/ O It I PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE �i ��� flk' PLANNING COMMITTE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMI F. PARKS COMMITTE G. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS (.,% BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MINUTES April 4, 1994 The scheduled meeting of the Kent Board of Adjustment was called to order by Chair Jack Cosby on the evening of Monday, April 4, 1994, at 7 p.m. in Chambers West, Kent City Hall. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEMBERS: Jack Cosby, Chair Walter Flue Doug Gesler CITY STAFF MEMBERS: Fred N. Satterstrom, Planning Manager Armin Quilici, Planner Chris Holden, Recording Secretary APPROVAL OF THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MINUTES It was MOVED and SECONDED and APPROVED to accept the January 3, 1994 minutes as written. Mr. Satterstrom reported that there would be a Board of Adjustment meeting on June 6, 1994. The applicant was Schneider Homes. Doug Gesler explained he would be out of town for two weeks in June. At that time it was discussed that two new Board members need to be appointed in order to have a quorum in June. The public hearings were opened with the administration of the oath. SEA TAC TRANSMISSION #V-94-1 This request was for a variance from Section 15. 04.104(E)(5) which requires a 20 -foot rear yard setback when a commercial development abuts a residential district. The accessory parts storage building would intrude into the 20 -foot rear yard setback area. Mr. Satterstrom presented the staff report. He reiterated the applicant's request. Some transparencies were shown depicting: 1) location and zoning of the site and surrounding area; 2) location of the addition to the storage shed. The size of the proposed addition would be 2,400 square feet. He commented that the applicant only needs a variance for that area located next to the MRH, High Density Multifamily Residential, 1 Board of Adjustment Minutes April 4, 1994 zone. Mr. Satterstrom presented the three criteria that must be considered when reviewing a variance request and the Planning Department staff findings. Staff recommended approval with the following conditions: 1. A lot line adjustment shall be submitted to the City Planning Department for approval prior to issuance of any development permit for expansion of the accessory building. Said lot line adjustment shall delete the lot line which bisects the Sea Tac Transmission site. 2. A recreation easement over the westerly ten feet of the Sea Tac Transmission site shall be granted to the City of Kent. This easement shall be approved by the Kent Parks Department and shall be completed prior to issuance of any development permit for expansion of the accessory building. 3. The owner shall submit a current title report showing that the area within the proposed setback variance is not encumberedby any easements for utilities (i.e., water, sewer, storm drainage) or ingress or egress. This report shall be submitted in conjunction with and at the same time as a development permit for expansion of the accessory building. The applicant was asked to comment. Pat McAllister, applicant, reported that he had already contacted the Parks Department, and the ten -foot easement requested by the Parks Department is primarily for an easement purpose. He had no further testimony. There was no further public testimony. Commissioner Gesler MOVED that the variance sought by Sea Tac Transmission be granted subject to the three conditions requested by the City. The conditions are: 1. A lot line adjustment shall be submitted to the City Plannir Department for approval prior to issuance of any developmei._ permit for expansion of the accessory building. Said lot line adjustment shall delete the lot line which bisects the Sea Tac Transmission site. 2. A recreation easement over the westerly ten feet of the Sea Tac Transmission site shall be granted to the City of Kent. This easement shall be approved by the Kent Parks Department and shall be completed prior to issuance of any development permit for expansion of the accessory building. E Board of Adjustment Minutes April 4, 1994 3. The owner shall submit a current title report showing that the area within the proposed setback variance is not encumbered by any easements for utilities (i.e., water, sewer, drainage) or ingress or egress. This report shall be submitted in conjunction with and at the same time as a development permit for expansion of the accessory building. The motion was SECONDED and APPROVED. The variance was granted with conditions. LAUKALA VIEW VARIANCE #V-94-2 A request to modify condition 2 of #V-93-3 which states, "The maximum allowable building height above street grade at 45th Place South shall be twelve feet. This could be accommodated by a flat roof; however, a pitched roof is acceptable as long as the roof's highest point is no more than twelve (12) feet above the adjacent street grade." The applicant is requesting that the condition be changed to allow 15 feet above grade. Armin Quilici, Planning Department, presented the staff report. He reiterated the applicant's request to modify condition 2 of #V-93-3. Mr. Quilici showed some transparencies depicting: 1) the location of the site and 2) zoning of the site and surrounding area. Mr. Quilici briefly outlined the previous request and the reason why the applicant is requesting a variance to increase the 12 feet above grade to 15 feet above grade. The Planning Department has recommended approval with the following conditions: 1. The maximum allowable building height above street grade at 45th Place South shall be fifteen (15) feet, measured from the street grade to the highest point of the roof. 2. Any approval of this variance is tied directly to the site plan and site section submitted as part of this application. Any significant changes to the site plan or site section tha' are not tied to the conditions of this variance will requir a new variance hearing. 3. Any approval of this variance is tied directly to the conditions set forth in #V-93-31 the Laukala Variance, except for condition no. 2. Failure to meet those conditions will require a new variance hearing. 4. Any approval of this variance is tied directly to the conditions set forth in STV -93-2, the 45th Place South Street Vacation. Failure to meet those conditions will require a new variance hearing. 3 Board of Adjustment Minutes April 4, 1994 Marvin Laukala, applicant, commented that at the time he asked for the first variance, his builder told him that all that was needed was 12 feet above grade. However, after further checking the site, unless the house is moved down the hill, which is infeasible, or had a flat roof, 12 feet above grade is not enough. Since a flat roof would be impracticable in the northwest, rw 15 feet. LaukTheala house is requesting three more feet above grade, would be more attractive with the 15 feet above grade. Mr. Laukala spoke to some of the neighbors, and none of them had a problem with the requested increase. Mr. Ouilici had received a letter from a neighbor, Mr. Little. He read the letter into the record. Mr. Satterstrom commented that every time there's a request fora variance, the surrounding neighbors are notified by Furthermore, a public notice board with information concerning this hearing is also posted on the site, so that the surrounding neighborhood is well informed about this request. Arnold Green, neighbor, adjacent downslope from this property, stated that he is in favor of the proposed construction. He cmmened highertthan hthis hproposed sl5efootlabovetstreetnlevel area that are request. commissioner Gesler MOVED that the variance request by approved with the following conditions: 1. The maximum allowable building height above street grade at 45th Place South shall be fifteen (15) feet, measured from the street grade to the highest point of the roof. 2. Any approval of this variance is tied directly to the site plan and site section submitted as part of this application. n or site section that Any significant changes to the site pla are not tied to the conditions of this variance will requir, a new variance hearing. 3. Any approval of this variance is tied directly to the conditions set forth in #V-93-3, the Laukala Variance, except for condition no. 2. Failure to meet those conditions will require a new variance hearing. 4. Any approval of this variance is tied d ictly to the conditions set forth in STV -93-2, the 45th Place eet Vacation. Failure to meet those conditions will require a new variance hearing. 4 Board of Adjustment Minutes April 4, 1994 The motion was SECONDED and APPROVED. The variance was granted with conditions. ADJOURNMENT A MOTION was made and SECONDED to close the public hearing. The motion was APPROVED. The hearing was adjourned at 8:15 p.m. Respectfully submitted, ame P. Harris, Secretary G PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE APRIL 25, 1994 PRESENT: PAUL MANN DON WICKSTROM TIM CLARK TOM BRUBAKER JIM BENNETT MR & MRS RUST Wickstrom said there are three or four houses on a community well on 122nd P1. S.E. and apparently the owner of the well wants the others to establish their own water service. He said that Mr. Kerkel has claimed this is presenting a hardship for him. He wants to connect to city water however, there is a charge in lieu of assessment in the amount of $632.50. Wickstrom said that we concur that he be granted a hardship and be allowed to pay this assessment over a period of time. Committee unanimously recommended that Council authorize that installment payments be made to the City by Richard Kerkel for the $632.50 charge in lieu of assessment fee. Sidewalks - Status Wickstrom stated that Bennett had requested a status update on the sidewalk funding. He said we have just released one major contract to R. E. Bailey Construction. Wickstrom referred to a map in the Committee's packet which indicated the different areas where Bailey will be working in the downtown core. He said there will also be a second phase, of approximately one-quarter million dollars, to be done in the Fall. With the street vacation money, we will be taking care of the existing pedestrian pathway problems such as in the areas of Sequoia Jr. High and Park Orchard Elementary. Wickstrom said that there is an issue with Carnaby Way sidewalks. Staff had a residential meeting to discuss neighborhood traffic control and it was mentioned that we are going to install sidewalks on Carnaby Way which is associated with Star Lake Elementary and Totem Jr. High. He said there is an older plat adjacent to the school that has everything except sidewalks. Wickstrom said we were going to put in sidewalks at no expense to the homeowner however, there was some concern raised from one property owner with extensive landscaping, who objects to the sidewalks. Wickstrom said that the Mayor has suggested that the committee may possibly want to meet with the homeowners to discuss this issue. In response to Bennett, Wicks erre said that accumulation. e balanceHe of $640,at 000 ere in the Street Fund is a two Y ram where we were going to was $40,000 from the $75,000 program participate in LIDs for sidewalks. In response to Mrs. Rust, Wickstrom said this is all Capital Improvement Project Fund money. Committee recommended that in lieu of a neighborhood meeting, a flyer "questionnaire be mailed to the property owners regarding the sidewalks at Carnaby Way and depending on their response, it would then be determined whether or not sidewalks would be installed. Underground Wiring Tim Clark raised the question of converting underground power and cable. Wickstrom explained that when the power poles come down, then cable T.V., power and telephone need to be converted.o H und r sand aid there are tariffs related to converting u gsaid oin the case of telephone that the city ends up paying. aY g our tariff was Jam Central Ave fromes St. north to the freeway, 00. Brubaker explained that the ultimate approximately am authority for Puget Power is the Washington Utility and Transportation Commission. He said they have the authority to we issue these tariffs and that basically supersedes a paystfoorlty what. might exercise in our right-of-way in terms of who p y Wickstrom said that we can do it, order it done, but we end up Wickstrom explained that in going underground, all paying for it. the services need to be reconnected across the street and in so doing, all the streets would be torn up. Wickstrom said that just removing a sidewalk is not the answer. Wickstrom stated that going to underground service in an area is very expensive. He further stated that the ideal time to do this is when we have a major overlay or total reconstruction of a street. Clark asked if there was any preliminary work that could bee now while we are replacing sidewalks, for future underground power. Wickstrom said that because we are not doing continuous sidewalk sections in the project, (the sections are sporadic based on tree damage) there is nothing to be gained. He said the other he is that the longer the duct work, etc., is underground, codes and regulations change so what may meet codes today, could be outdated at the time of use. There was no further discussion on this item. Meeting Adjourned: 5:30 P.M.