HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Meeting - Council - Agenda - 10/04/1994f
City ofKent
Coity Council Meeting
Agenda
Mayor Jim White
Council Members
Judy Woods, President
Jim Bennett Jon Johnson
Tim Clark Paul Mann
Christi Houser Leona Orr
October 4, 1994
Office of the City Clerk
17
CITY or L-2912 V is SUMMARY AGENDA
KENT CITY COUNCIL MEETING
October 4, 1994
Council Chambers
7:00 p.m.
9
MAYOR: Jim White COUNCILMEMBERS: Judy Woods, President
Jim Bennett Tim Clark Christi Houser
Jon Johnson Paul Mann Leona Orr
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
1. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
A. Employee of the Month
B. Proclamation - National Arts and Humanities Month
C. Proclamation - Special Olympics Coach and Volunteer of the Year
D. Regional Justice Center Update
=NTRpDUCTIbv OF DL�Ev�TES FROM yf1*6ZNOU)C11A)
2. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. LID 345 - S. 218th Street Improvements
B. Moratorium Regarding Zoning for Adult Entertainment Businesses
3. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Approval of Minutes
B. Approval of Bills
C. Creation of LID 346 - S. 212th Street Improvements - Ordinance- 3186
D. Procurement Policies - Ordinance - 3187
E. Speed Limits - Ordinance - 3/88
F. Speed Limits - Resolution - /V01-1
G. No Parking Zones - ordinance- 3189
H. Opticom System
I. James Hankins - Sewer Permit 108
J. LID 327 - Segregation Request - Resolution- /qd�
K. LID 330 - Segregation Request - Resolution -14Vb9 14-N/6)
L. Meadow Ridge Elementary School Pedestrian Pathway - Authorization- -'�7y1C
M. Employee Assistance Program - Contract
N. LID 344 - Installment Note and Ordinance - 3 196)
O. LID 342 - Installment Note and ordinance -3 19/
P. Puget Power Receipting - Letter of Agreement
Q. 1995 Budget Workshop - Set Date
R. Jones/Hobbs Annexation - Set Hearing Date
S. Beck Annexation 4 0
TT G(6t�EnlGt°�
4. OTHER'6t
BUSINESS Q�4m
A. Street Use Permit'/'9'7
ermit Or inance - 3/9
Valley Medical Center Proposed Tax Levy Lid Lift - Resolution- lgll
5. BIDS
A. 116th Avenue SE Water Main Relocation
B. Kiwanis Tot Lot 11 Renovation
6. CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS
7. REPORTS
EXECUTIVE SESSION - Labor Negotiations
8. ADJOURNMENT
NOTE: A copy of the full agenda packet is available for perusal in the City
Clerk s Office and the Kent Library.
An explanation of the agenda format is given on the back of this page.
Any person requiring a disability accommodation should contact the City in
advance for more information. For TDD relay service call 1-800-635-9993 or the
City of Kent (206) 854-6587.
PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
Citizens wishing to address the Council will, at this time,
make known the subject of interest, so all may be properly
heard.
A) Employee
�of� the Month
llfi/�
///
B) Proclamation - National Arts and Humanities Month
C) Proclamation - Special Olympics Coach and Volunteer of the
Year
D) Regional Justice Center Update
SUBJECT:
Kent City Council Meeting
Date October 4, 1994
Category Public Hearings
LID 345 - S. 218TH STREET IMPROVEMENTS
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: This date has been set for the Public
Hearing on LID 345 for the improvement of S. 218th Street from
East Valley Highway east to SR 167, including water and sewer
stub extensions to unserviced property.
___ ___ „ ion of tnd project
3. EXHIBITS: Public Works Director Memorandum and vicinity map
4. RECOMMENDED BY: Council Action
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED:
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
OPEN HEARING:
PUBLIC INPUT:
CLOSE HEARING:
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
to direct the City Attorney to prepare the ordinance creating
LID 345, for the improvement of S. 218th Street from East
Valley Highway east to SR 167.
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 2A
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
October 4, 1994
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Don Wickstrom, 191rector of Public Works
RE: LID 345 - South 218th Street Improvements
(East Valley Highway to SR 167)
BACKGROUND
Over the past few years there has been substantial industrial
development within this project area. Unfortunately, this area is
served by South 218th Street which is currently a substandard road,
with a deficient reverse curve. The combination of the substandard
roadway width and the too -sharp reverse curves present safety
issues to both vehicles and pedestrians. Several incidents have
occurred where vehicles have ended up in the road side ditches. As
a result, the City can not knowingly allow the situation to be
aggravated without incurring liability. As such, new developments
within the LID boundary are required via the City's SEPA authority
to make improvements to South 218th Street and those properties
east of the reverse curves are also required to mitigate their
impact on the safety issue thereat.
Prior to our awareness of the safety issues, each development was
limited to improving their frontage and could opt out by executing
a no -protest LID participation covenant instead. This approach had
two major benefits: First, the roadway would not be improved in a
piecemeal manner; and second, when enough owners were obligated by
the LID participation covenants, the City could pursue formation of
the LID and then equitably distribute the costs for the complete
roadway improvement to all the properties which benefitted.
As a result numerous covenants have been executed and presently
total at 74.84 percent of the preliminary LID assessments for this
project. Due to the present safety issues and the undue financial
burden placed in the last few remaining developable properties the
Public Works Department believes now is the appropriate time to
pursue the formation of this street improvement LID.
As such, an informal meeting with the property owners was held.
The original meeting was on October, 18, 1990, but due to wetland
concerns, the project was put on hold until the City's wetland
regulations were finalized. These regulations were finalized on
May 18, 1993, with Council passage of Ordinance 3109. The
engineering staff then evaluated the impact of wetlands on
potential development within the LID and made assessment adjustment
for same. Also we reviewed the original project scope for cost
saving modifications after which a second property owner meeting
was hproerty
were
notified of the meeting 9including whatld on March 23, 19. All thefthe r estimatedowners assessment
was.
NEED FOR IMPROVEMENTS
A. Streets. Currently portions of South 218th Street are less
than 24 feet wide, and no portion has curb & gutters
or
sidewalks. Improvements such as additional width, street
lights, curb & gutter, street trees and sidewalk improvements
are required to bring the street fully up to current
standards, and to meet both functional and aesthetic
requirements. An existing reverse curve will be improved
significantly in order to permit trucks to drive past each
other without waiting until one truck has completely
negotiated the old curves; thus allowing development of
property lying easterly of the reverse curves to continue.
B. Drainage. A new and environmentally sensitive storm drainage
system must be installed that will link the existing storm
drainage system with the new subsurface drainage system in
such a way that any environmental impacts to receiving waters
are minimized.
C. utilities. Various properties within the area are not
currently hooked up to City water and sanitary sewer, or are
not fully serviced for their highest potential and best use.
Prior to widening and rebuilding the roadway, these utilities
must be extended outside of the roadway section to avoid
future cutting and excavating for these services. Please note
that future cutting and excavation of the road will be
strongly discouraged if not prohibited. Therefore, if you
want the utilities, the construction must take place now.
Please note that sanitary sewer stubs are currently available
but must be extended from the existing property line to the
new property line.
D. Development Requirements. The above-described needs have been
identified for this area. Any future development in the area
will have to address these needs. Commitments to meet these
needs are required to obtain building permits and are usually
conditions of other development procedures as well.
This project area contains undeveloped property or under -developed
property. Owners of these properties will be faced with satisfying
these needs in order to develop to their maximum potential. others
have already faced these requirements and have committed themselves
to participate in the funding for this L.I.D.
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
The proposed project is the widening of South 218th Street from
East Valley Highway east to the creek (approximately 600 feet east
of the curves).
1. A 32 foot roadway (face of curb to face of curb) which will be
a two lane road with no on -street parking.
2. Cement concrete curb and gutter on both sides.
3. Cement concrete sidewalks on both sides. (5' wide)
4. Storm drainage system including biofiltration swales
to adjacent properties.
5. Street lighting system (on power poles).
6. Reverse curve realignment.
7. Utility stubs as required, both water and sanitary
8. Cul-de-sac at east end.
9. New culvert for Garrison Creek - Valley Branch.
10. Signing and channelization.
11. Hydroseeding of unpaved areas.
PROJECT FUNDING
and stubs
sewer.
This project is proposed to be funded 100 percent by the Local
Improvement District method except for the water and sewer stubs.
The water and sewer stubs will be funded initially by the City. A
charge in lieu of assessment will then be established which the
property owner will pay upon connection.
LID assessments: $1,164,620.59
Water fund: 61810.27
Sewer fund: 9.730.00
Total Project Cost $1,181,160.86
METHOD OF ASSESSMENT
The costs for this street improvement will be distributed to each
benefiting property owner as follows:
The total street assessments are based upon the zone and termini
method. In this case seven strips, each one hundred feet wide, are
drawn parallel with the City right-of-way line. The assessment
rate for the strip right next to the right-of-way line is weighted
seven times the value of the seventh strip from the right-of-way
line; the assessment rate for the second strip from the right-of-
way line is six times the rate for the seventh strip; and so on
until the seventh strip. Each property owner will then pay a total
assessment depending on the number of square feet within each of
the seven strips that are contained in their parcel.
As mentioned previously, wetlands were identified and mapped which
effect several properties (#71 16, 17, 18 and 19). These areas,
including the required wetland buffers, were not included in the
assessment calculations. Also, a 50 foot setback from the creek
was deleted from the assessed area for undeveloped properties (#12
and 16) .
The costs for water and sanitary sewer service stubouts will be
charged totally against the benefiting property and shall be paid
as a charge in lieu of assessment at the time you connect.
Final assessments are based upon the total project costs. This
means that the final assessment figure may be either slightly
higher or lower than the figures shown on the preliminary
assessment roll.
PAYMENT OF ASSESSMENT
Upon Council passing, the ordinance confirming the final assessment
roll (after completion of the construction), there is a 30 -day
period in which any portion or all of the assessment can be paid
without interest charges. After the 30 -day period, the balance is
paid over a ten year period wherein each year's payment is 1/10th
of the principal plus interest on the unpaid balance. The
interest will be what the market dictates.
EASEMENT AND RIGHT -OF -ACQUISITION
The construction of this street improvement project will require
property acquisition along the length of the project in order to
provide the necessary right-of-way needed in excess of the
substandard 33 foot wide right-of-way now owned by the City. Slope
easements and construction easements will also be required. Each
property owner involved will be advised of the appraised value of
these right-of-way and easement parcels during negotiations between
the City and the owner. Final settlement may be either a direct
payment to the owner, or it can be applied as a credit toward their
LID assessment, thereby reducing their yearly payments.
SUPPORT FOR LID
To approve an LID, property owners with combined LID assessments
representing 40 percent of the total assessment total must support
the LID.
Presently the owners with a combined 74.84 percent of the total LID
assessments are obligated to participate in this street improvement
LID via executed no -protest covenants. The final decision of
whether or not to form the LID, however, will be made by the City
Council.
At the second informal meeting approximately 10 property owners
attended. The property owners in attendance were not excited about
spending the money but did not voice strong opposition to the LID.
However, they did question the need for the project and were
concerned that the LID proposal was triggered by the construction
of Kent East Corporate Park development on the north side of S.
218th St. They also questioned the need for sidewalks on both
sides and asked questions regarding the impact of the road widening
on their specific parcels and existing improvements.
ENVIRONMENTAL
On May 12, 1994, the Kent Planning Department issued a DNS for LID
345.
RECOMMENDATION
Due to the safety concerns and the level of committed support (by
agreement) for the project, the Public Works Department recommends
proceeding with the LID formation process for LID 345.
D639
PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE
JULY 25, 1994
PRESENT: PAUL MANN TOM BRUBAKER
JIM BENNETT ROD BAILEY
TIM CLARK MR.& MRS RUST
DON WICKSTROM
LID 345 - South 218th Street Improvements
Wickstrom stated that at the previous Committee meeting, there was
a discussion regarding the deletion of sidewalks and the
implication that would have. He said sidewalks on the south side
of the street amount to about $18,000 however, because of the way
the properties lie, the properties do not have much depth on the
south side versus the north side. He said the bulk of that
$18,000, if reduced, would be Trammell Crow's. He further said
that on the Rust's property their savings would amount to $229.00,
noting that a sidewalk could not be built for that amount of money.
He said the large parcels on the north side, will be picking up the
major portion of the assessments. Wickstrom noted that deleting
m_
the sidewalk would result in a reduction, however not significant;
if sidewalks ever had to be built the best way is .to have them
included in the LID because of the cost, in terms of the smaller
properties on the south side of the road. Wickstrom said that we
also looked at reducing the right of way take along the south side
by two feet, the results being that the properties on the south
side would be getting paid for that richt of way. By taking that
(right of way) away, they get less money in return, which in this
scenario, would result in a higher assessment. He said the right
of way amounts to about $38,000.
Wickstrom explained that the issue was, by deleting the sidewalk
and deleting some of the right of way on the south side, the
results are that some of the assessments on the south side would
increase because they have less right of way credit (less money in
return for their right of way) and some of the cost for sidewalks
would be absorbed by Kent Corporate Park which is a parcel with big
depth on the north side.
In response to Clark's question regarding eliminating sidewalks in
the curve area possibly making it more feasible for vehicles to
pass at that point, Wickstrom stated that the sidewalk has no
bearing on where the curves go noting it would be a 32' wide road.
Wickstrom further explained the structure of the road by reviewing
the plans with the Committee.
In response to Mrs. Rust's question on what value this LID has to
the City, Wickstrom said that the issue here is the safety concern
with the curves in the road and the fact that we will not allow
development east of the curves because the road is not wide enouch
to accommodate the traffic.
Bennett stated that he felt the north side of the road has more
built-in space, even allowing for the number of utility poles which
would need to be removed. He felt it would be more functional to
do the LID on the north side of the road. Wickstrom responded
saying that the issue on the north side of the road was under roundhat per fwe
our
move those power poles, we would have to g g
ordinance, and that would get costly. He said because of that, we
e and
took advantage of
wouldn't need to orelocatuth de the powegr Land thet
for the Swale;e
saves the entire LID money.
Committee voted 2-1 to proceed with the adoption of LID 345 as
presently designed.
Resolution - Rail Corridor Passenger Service ob•ectives _
Mann stated that this was discussed between Councilmembers with
regard to incorporating language into the Resolution that would
insure the use of the building owned by Burlington Northern.
Brubaker said his interpretation of this was that Council wanted
ok
the Operations Director to contact Burlington Northern that
into the possibility of using the building. Mann Sugg_
some language be included in the Resolution stating that Burlirgto
make a stop in Kent.
Committee unanimously recommended adoption of the Resolution as
amended.
Meeting adjourned: 5:05 P.M.
PRESENT:
PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE
PAUL MANN
TIM CLARK
JIM BENNETT
DON WICKSTROM
JUNE 13, 1994
GARY GILL
LAURIE EVEZICH
MR & MRS RUST
ROD BAILEY
TOM GRAHAM
LID 345 South 218th Street Improvements
Wickstrom explained that this LID on 218th Street is a street
widening project. The area is industrially zoned with an S-curve
in the middle which has created some problems, particularly with
the development to the east. He said there have been accidents
where vehicles have gone into the ditch because it is so narrow
and, large trucks need to use the entire road width to make the
curves. Wickstrom said the problem as we see it, is that we can't
continue to allow development east of those curves to aggravate
that existing problem without eventually being drawn into some sort
of lawsuit. He said we have been mitigating the development
requirements to resolve the problem. He said this is an
industrially served area, including what was previously Trammel
Crow Industrial Park to the north. Wickstrom said we have 740
participation covenants in the project; we have re -worked this
project many times initially beginning in 1990 and then when our
wetland issues came up we waited until that ordinance was passed to
determine what the implications would be. As a result, we are
exempting those properties involved in wetlands because they are
not developable.
Referring to a map in the packet, Wickstrom explained we would
install a cul-de-sac turnaround. He said the right-of-way is now
up against the valley freeway but there is only a limited number of
parcels there and to build this all the way to the freeway is more
expensive.
In response to Clark's question on wetlands,
Wickstrom said that
when properties are assessed, benefit needs to be shown. I� tthe-
property is wetland, essentially it is undevelopable; therefore, no
benefit; therefore, they shouldn't be assessed. He said we waited
until that issue was resolved.
Rod Bailey expressed concerns regarding losing any of his parcel.
Wickstrom said the issue is, when we get to the design (we -are
presently dealing with preliminary data) that is one issue we need
to work out. Wickstrom said we are aware of what the problem would
be in taking any of Mr. Bailey's property.
to Clark, Wickstrom said we will be widening the road
In response
width to Wickstrom said our intent is to straighten the road
ve to the north.
out and move the s-cur
have
on
s of
Clark asked
Jick trom said the amount ofssavingsste
ary toof notdoingboth
the road. S assessments. He
sides is not Yse g ican is tot in rput ms osidew lks on both sides. that
right now, proposal
ionthe Committee agreed to defer this item
After further discuss
to the July 25th Public Storks , meeting.
Green/Duw'amish Watershed Alliance
Wickstron explained that this is an alliance with concerns about
botto
the Gree watershed in that they are sse tthel resolution
protect it. Wickstrom said we are asking
or Warded on to Council for _
endorsing the goals of the alliance be
adoption.
Committee Alliance
unanimously recommended adoption of the Green/Duwamish
Wa�.ershed
Kinosuort Industrial Condemnation Ordinance
This item was deleted from the agenda due to the absence of the
City Attorney.
Meeting adjourned at 5:00 p.m-
PROYUS�,L
SOUTH 218TH STREET IMPROVEMENT
(EAST VALLE,Y I-4IGI-3WAY TO SR 167)
JANUARY 27, 1994
U
J
N
N
F. I-.
J] •I O O r ry O
L
` p
V0414
-O Nn`0 `��Nr 0-'P'/tPm'OmP
�D �I P Vl � O� m r 'D m N N O
•-'
•O
J
O
r C. i. L�
r' P VI P
• O .� LI S
N
.y Ul O N 'D •• O nLl
"'
m
C
n.
w
r1.1 O
3
O
' m O .-..O •� J] r ul m r'1 �.
`U
I.1
(J 2
r v
O� N n n O N ✓' `� O n P N P m m v
O
L
P
g
.o O rl o m N r m •v •+ O v O `D P N
P
\ J•
+ U 41 \
'/I O ✓1 c N O N N n 'n JI r ry n ry
W
F C
O
r N v� ti
• G_]C
r,F Wim„
I I I 1 4 ++++
.
L
m 0 0 G
N
9
C
m
00 00O
m 0
N
0 0 0 0 0
'
m
O
O N N O m 0
P
N
3
n O P P r
0 0 N r 0 0 0 0
P
U
+ H 3 H
w
O O O O n m r 0 0
�
• � C C
fY H U
N N N Vl '/1 N Vl N N N N N N N N N N N 1/•
�
✓
a
U
9
3
O
n z C C P N n P O C N< n rl
O
LU
y
\
O�'1
r0 r N<mm0ne�n <vr.•ulr <c�
n PN P ✓'
!�
N
w
H
I N W 3
V• < O N N N< 'D -� < •-I O< P
u
>
l•-I
•
^J W > W ❑
U
I/�
�(
< G p
� yl � (`
V) N N N N Vl t/) H N Vl 1/1 N N N N 1/1 N N 1/•
N
U
Y
O
Ox��
V]
N
�.C�nnP.�••m'o r...n.rn�n ✓+.o
r
Ty
- m
N
�
H
s
1-1
•,?
O
U O W W
✓O L� c
vp ua
.0SC
ou
✓O
V
J O N O •-• •r C N O N J1 n� fl V' m O^
m
� O y
1-t
H
•
--. vlF'n F
Pnmr-+
✓
✓'� •,
n- W O
-C F G '>
N N N N N to N N N N 1n N N N N V1 N Vl
9 y
� 1
-.nv O mr�+<�nnc0 nmm c c
•o
� ✓
�NrO c crvcm O `o PP
ULA G U
. . .^'
O n r N
.
N
'-'
m
m
Q
G
N W �-
�r -+c m<N�ltrv.-. '• cNm N�•-'� N
NOrOr n N c✓1NN N�nr
�`
.a-I ��
�
.. •] O
m N N
C W p 2
Q p
a
I /1
N
t/1 N N Vl N N Vf N N N N N N N N N N N
T✓ y O
3.O ti -
Y o c
o u y m .•
F-
O r LO 'n n.+P N^^'`•� `U Nn m n<.O N
m
m L C U 9
.l
GDF•-•
PN r•-'r000Nd n 0 N<OmO v
O
PE m C C
•.I O W W
N r r '/1 r O �m N m C v] n r n m N m V
^'^"
n
U
✓ U 'J Y m d
V CSG
mn'nnm mP•"V
onnrm Nrc OOmm P
o
L�.-I m o ✓x
o U
Olp �pc
O r
0 4 W S
r r N N< N ✓1 b •y n t!1 n LO C r P
'-'
P
L L m G U i
F VI H
O n C r N N N '+ •'-I ^• N n
L L L m ]( d
•y E. Q I
Vl N N N N 1A '/1 N 1/1 N N V1 N N N N N N ✓1
t/1
Y -•„I
o J o a
p m w p u m a
m a +
m w N u x y
C u m -w
•p m C IL m
p
>k.
dX ✓ ro �•+'
d.
Y .-1 .•1 IE ..,
U mx G0 'O
X
m G ✓
U
L d Y m T✓ C Y
m
m • --I C
d 9 u 3 m J o u
F
Y U m G G L O U
w m Y Q✓ Y
m
y
cx
O O m Y -+ .Oi
P m p J ✓•
J
o 0 c m m m m✓ d J
y m y
O
y C •-• L L y Y i
d 4 m F > >
L. a m d✓" d m
U
Um
m 1/I ✓ Y a d a
•O m J d
d y ✓ t Y
Ta U m C C 9
C C d d p
{"
C
!T
C L J 6 L✓
m .-I C ,.I C✓
W C
m m O
�•
41
'O O E
X
E a C u m S mm.
d E v
m m C d U
`
O O A U C•� ✓ U U E U m m a✓
..a -a -N A .•+ 1, C C 4 .-1
H
m y m Y .-• O' m
0 m d
E
V U d� O x
p G u u ul In u c Ca -{ m d d U u
W
m O d C
p
y
Ll ✓ -y C N u m m 4 d N 0 C U
N
m O L m m
W
m U p 6 h h 'a u •-1 `7 O G
L
m m m m .•1 U .a m
Y d R: rl ^I
m m mmv
J u V
P.y
C WY 4 a Y 4 b V
m
N w C U •y m •-"
O'.> m .•1 J m J m
A u L U 4 d L t d •-' ^' d 9 m TTY U
l^ , > u> 9 ✓ A✓
H
A C m] C d E✓ u L' Y' L Am Y O O Y E
m N m N m N O 4 m •-' ^' A N
F
O
O
4�
O d a y J>
O
N C
8
N N n Y--- m T
.y .Y .�• r• .y .y .y
•y N .... .._ �� r
VI O
• _r .r
rr
O
11
ry- i l l
Ma
991
0.11M
-� .. ALLY SR 167
w
S4TN AVE.
(EAST VALLEY H
F1
L.I.D. BOUNDARYulttlltttu
111llllllllll"111.1aI ��1
1
f ,e , iI
a
Z K
s
�
�I
1
X t'S
�t
w
c4�a'Et
. ..
''�d�,Y'. �., vim •E•.
�
s
i
{
f ,e , iI
trN
.
M
Y
�t
2
t t AA` y
c4�a'Et
. ..
''�d�,Y'. �., vim •E•.
zPM
1
Y K
F
_
Y
+
7
r
' n A •'
t n
I
I ci
4 -
Y K
j
_
7
r
. 3
i t
� r
J �
f _1w
y `
yJ
�
y -i
s<
i L
r 1 �
9
V
�•�' ✓ ...
�r!� E < � w� -
'u. fix.
••S .
r•`..
3 5��'�. 5',
xy �, (i+ TI�•.xtaR,
.w.r
J
���
i
_
? -µ:';:ii
J{
�� 7>
t
a _Y
'N,
t.'
y
,
TK:
,
,t 4"-1�- atr z
n-tTT��
' k"
5 +lit Cck e w
X
t '
! A
s
toR
4-4
�x
Z
"r
,ffisl
i„
glj
,
,t 4"-1�- atr z
n-tTT��
' k"
5 +lit Cck e w
X
t '
! A
s
toR
�x
Z
"r
,ffisl
i„
Kent City Council Meeting
Date October 4, 1994
Category Public Hearings
1. SUBJECT: MORATORIUM REGARDING ZONING FOR ADULT ENTERTAINMENT
BUSINESSES
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: This date has been set for a public
hearing on the emergency ordinance adopted by the Kent City
Council at its September 20, 1994 meeting, imposing a mora-
torium on the issuance of permits and on the acceptance of
applications for permits for adult entertainment businesses.
This ordinance was adopted as a result of the ruling of the
U.S. District Court for the Western District in Cause No. C94 -
256Z holding that the City's adult entertainment zoning
restrictions do not provide an adequate number of alternative
sites for the location of such facilities. The moratorium was
established for a period of six months from the effective date
of the ordinance or until the effective date of any ordinance
establishing new land use regulations governing such busi-
nesses. Pursuant to RCW 35A.63.220, a hearing on the issue of
a land use moratorium must be held prior to or within sixty
days following adoption of such ordinance.>
3. EXHIBITS: Ordinance No. 3185
4. RECOMMENDED BY: city Council
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
6. EXPENDITURE REOUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
OPEN HEARING:
PUBLIC INPUT:
CLOSE HEARING:
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember 190,4 moves, Councilmember Cl/� seconds
to adopt the findings on the emergency ordinance establishing a
land use moratorium relating to adult entertainment businesses.
DISCUSSION:
ACTION: -Mz�y
Council Agenda
Item No. 2B
ORDINANCE NO. ✓ / JY6-
AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the
City of Kent, Washington, relating to land
use and zoning of adult entertainment
businesses, imposing a moratorium on the
issuance of permits and on the acceptance of
applications for permits for adult
entertainment businesses as defined in KCC
Section 5.11 and further declaring a public
emergency necessary for the protection of
public health, safety, property and peace.
WHEREAS, the City's adult entertainment zoning
restrictions were found, by the U.S. District Court for the
Western District of Washington, to deny adult entertainment
businesses reasonable alternative avenues of communication by not
providing an adequate number of alternative sites for the
location of such facilities; and
WHEREAS, the City needs time to revise its present
zoning restrictions and determine how to provide reasonable sites
for the location of adult entertainment businesses consistent
with the court's ruling; and
adaleum
WHEREAS, the City Council has found that there are
negative secondary effects associated with adult entertainment
businesses which constitute a threat to the public health, safety
and welfare; and
WHEREAS, the protection of the public health, safety
and welfare would be jeopardized by the establishment of adult
entertainment businesses prior to adoption of new zoning
legislation by Council after receipt of the recommendations
regarding the zoning of such businesses by the Planning
Commission; and
WHEREAS, any changes to the zoning code must also
consider changes in zoning regulations adopted pursuant to the
Growth Management Act, RCW 36.70A; and
WHEREAS, the City Council therefore finds that the
protection of the public health, safety and welfare supports
imposing a moratorium on adult entertainment businesses pending
appropriate amendments consistent with the ruling of the U.S.
District Court Cause No. C94 -256Z; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 35A.12.130, the City Council
may, by a vote of majority plus one of the Council, adopt a
public emergency ordinance for the protection of public health,
public safety, public property or public peace; and
2
WHEREAS, due to the court's ruling that City zoning
code restrictions do not allow for an adequate number of sites
for the location of adult use businesses, the City cannot
properly accept and process applications for such facilities; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 35A.12.130, the City Council
also finds that, due to the negative secondary effects associated
with adult entertainment businesses, an emergency ordinance is
necessary for the protection of public health, public safety,
public property, and public peace; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES
HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. The above listed recitals are found to be
true and correct in all respects.
SECTION 2. As a result of the ruling of the U.S.
District Court for the Western District in Cause No. C94 -256Z and
due to the negative secondary effects associated with adult
entertainment businesses, an emergency situation exists
necessitating immediate action and that a public emergency
ordinance is the appropriate and necessary action to take for the
protection of public health, public safety, public property, and
public peace.
3
SECTION 3. Due to the findings set forth herein and as
authorized pursuant to RCW 35A.63.220, a moratorium is hereby
established for a period of six months from the effective date of
this ordinance or until the effective date of any ordinance
establishing new land use regulations governing the location of
adult entertainment businesses, whichever is sooner, and during
said moratorium, no use permit shall be issued nor shall any use
or permit application be accepted for any adult entertainment
business as defined in KCC 5.11.
SECTION 4. As a result of the ruling and order of the
U.S. District Court for the Western District in Cause No.
C94-2562, the plaintiff in said case shall not be affected by the
moratorium established herein for the proposed adult
entertainment use on the property identified in the order.
SECTION 5. Severability. If any section, sentence,
clause or phrase of this ordinance should be held to be invalid
or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such
invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity
or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or
phrase of this ordinance.
9
SECTION 6. Effective Date.
This emergency ordinance
shall take effect and be in force immediately upon adoption.
ATTEST:
'-
BRENDA JACOBER, CITY /CLERK
r
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ROGER A. LUBOVICH., CITY ATTORNEY
PASSED�day of 1c'.� - ��.C��'.'1_�. 1994.
APPROVED r` day of J-�1994.
PUBLISHED day of �-� �i �— 1994.
5
I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance
No. 3 , passed by the City Council of the City of Kent,
Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the City of Kent as
hereon indicated.
(SEAL)
BRENDA JACOBi ER, �ITY CLERK
0
CONSENT CALENDAR
3. City Council Action:
Council ember movei Councilmember
secondek that Consent Calendar Items A through 8'q'B'eapprovec�`.'—
Discuss
Action �}Yl,✓ !�� )�F�
3A. Approval of Minutes.
Approval of the minutes of the regular Council meeting of
September 20, 1994.
3B. Approval of Bills.
Approval of payment of the bills received through September 15,
1994 and paid through September 15, 1994 after auditing by the
Operations Committee on September 28, 1994.
Approval of checks issued for vouchers:
Date Check Numbers
9/1/94-9/15/94 146840-147388
Amount
$2,268,181.98
Approval of checks issued for payroll for September 1, 1994
through September 15, 1994 and paid on September 20, 1994:
Date
9/20/94 Checks
Advices
Check Numbers
197761-198058
18072-18434
Amount
$ 254,775.31
439,655.12
$ 694,430.43
Council Agenda
Item No. 3 A -B
Kent, Washington
September 20, 1994
Regular meeting of the Kent City Council was called to order at
7:00 p.m. by Mayor White. Present: Councilmembers Houser,
Johnson, Mann, Orr and Woods, Planning Director Harris, Public
Works Director Wickstrom, Parks Director Hodgson, Police Chief
Crawford, Fire Chief Angelo, Information Services Manager Spang
and Governmental Affairs Division Manager Martin. Approximately
30 people were at the meeting. Councilmembers Bennett and Clark
were excused from the meeting.
PUBLIC Day of Concern for the Hungry. Mayor White read
COMMUNICATIONS a proclamation noting that the City funds
emergency food programs, that social service
agencies need help to stem the tide of hunger,
and that the Seattle Emergency Feeding Program
has invited the City of Kent to join in an
effort to end hunger in our city. He declared
October 1, 1994, as Day of Concern for the
Hungry and encouraged all citizens to parti-
cipate. The proclamation was presented to
Mr. Arthur Lee, who noted that this project has
grown to ten cities and 65 stores.
Crime Prevention Month. Mayor White read a
proclamation declaring the month of October as
Crime Prevention Month in the City of Kent.
He noted that in this era of escalating fear
throughout the nation because of violence,
citizens must be made aware of what they can do
to protect themselves, their families, their
neighbors and their communities, and that effec-
tive crime prevention programs excel because of
partnerships among law enforcement, other
government agencies, and individuals. He called
on all citizens, government agencies, public and
private institutions and businesses to increase
their participation in crime prevention efforts.
The proclamation was presented to Police Chief
Crawford.
Chamber of Commerce Presentation. Barbara
Simpson of the Chamber of Commerce invited
Mayor White and Councilmembers to attend the
Asia Pacific International Trade Exchange as
Good Will Ambassadors on October 3rd. She noted
that Governor Mike Lowry and Mayor Jim White
will be speakers. Christine Wetmore of Tradec
noted that over 200 delegates from China,
Taiwan, Singapore and Viet Nam will participate,
and that interest has been expressed in
1
September 20, 1994
PUBLIC purchasing building products, telecommunications
COMMUNICATIONS equipment, medical equipment, infrastructure
development products, and distribution services.
Department of Licensing Presentation. Scott
Swann of the State of Washington Driver
Licensing Department announced a proposal to
change the days of operation of the office in
Kent to Monday through Friday. He explained
that since the Auburn, Federal Way, and Renton
offices are open Tuesday through Saturday, the
change would provide customer service in the
South King County area six days a week. Mayor
White thanked Swann for this information and
said any comments received by the City would be
forwarded to him.
CONSENT
WOODS MOVED that Consent Calendar Items A
CALENDAR
through M be approved. Houser seconded and the
motion carried.
MINUTES
(CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3A)
of Minutes. APPROVAL of the minutes of
Approval
the regular Council meeting of September 61
1994.
STREET
(PUBLIC HEARINGS - ITEM 2A)
S 212th Street Improvements. This
IMPROVEMENTS
LID 346
date has been set for the public hearing on LID
346 for the installation of sewers to service
specific parcels, sidewalks, and street lights
along S. 212th Street from the Green River to
SR 167.
Public Works Director Wickstrom pointed out the
location on the map, and noted that the City has
obtained a grant from the Washington State
Transportation Improvement Board to construct
high -occupancy vehicle lanes along S. 212th
Street between West Valley Highway and SR167.
He also noted that a new pedestrian signal will
be installed where the Interurban Trail crosses
S. 212th Street, and that an ISTEA grant was
awarded to the City for construction of this
signal. He said it was determined that this
would be an opportune time to put in the other
amenities such as sidewalks and street lights
which are sporadic in the area. He noted that
7
September 20, 1994
STREET the LID would finance the sidewalks, the street
IMPROVEMENTS lights, and part of the sewers, and that the
total project cost is $708,565.00. He noted
that this is a high volume street, and that
sidewalks would tie the industrial area to
recreation areas along the Green River and the
Interurban Trail, and would make bus service
more compatible to the businesses in the area.
Wickstrom noted that this LID contains 51
parcels and that there are no -protest covenants
in the amount of 14% for sidewalks, 38% for
street lights, and 50% for sewers. He noted
that owners with a combined 33.6% of the total
LID assessments are at this time obligated to
participate in this street improvements LID via
executed no -protest covenants or letters re-
questing service. He pointed out that sewers
are assessed only to those properties that do
not have sewer, and noted that no protests have
been received.
Mayor White opened the public hearing. There
were no comments from the audience and WOODS
MOVED to close the public hearing. Orr seconded
and the motion carried. MANN MOVED to direct
the City Attorney to prepare the ordinance
creating LID 346 for the improvement of S. 212th
Street from the Green River to SR 167. Houser
seconded and the motion carried.
TRAFFIC (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3I)
CONTROL LID 344 - Traffic Signal at 108th & 240th.
AUTHORIZATION to accept as comple-e the contract
with Breaker Construction, Inc. for LID 344,
108th & 240th Traffic Signal project, and re-
lease of retainage after receipt of State
releases, as recommended by the Public Works
Director. The final construction cost is
$84,724.00.
SEWER (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3F)
Meadow Ridge Elementary #26 Area. AUTHORIZATION
to implement a Charge in Lieu of 1'ssessment for
sewer service in the Meadow Ridge Elementary
School area (108th Avenue and 275-h block), as
Cc3
September 20, 1994
SEWER recommended by the Public Works Committee. This
would enable the involved properties to connect
to the sewer system upon paying their prorata
share of the downstream upsizing cost.
PUBLIC WORKS (BIDS - ITEM 5C)
Four -Wheel Drive Power Unit and Mower. Bid
opening for the Four Wheel Drive Power Unit and
Mower was held on September 12, 1994, with
Western Equipment Distributors, Inc. being the
only bidder. The Public Works Director recom-
mends accepting the bid of $27,780.35 including
sales tax, from Western Equipment Distributors,
Inc. MANN SO MOVED. Johnson seconded and the
motion carried.
SURPLUS (BIDS - ITEM 5A)
EQUIPMENT Sale of Surplus Water Meters Pipe and Fittings.
One bid was received and opened on May 19, 1994,
for the sale of surplus water meters, pipe and
fittings. Since only one bid was received,
the project was readvertised and reopened on
September 2nd. One bid was submitted by David
Q. Price in the amount of $1,637.28 including
sales tax.
The Public Works Director recommends acceptance
of the bid in the amount of $1,637.28. MANN
MOVED that the surplus water meters, pipe and
fittings be sold to David Q. Price in the bid
amount of $1,637.28 including sales tax.
Johnson seconded and the motion carried.
COMMUNITY (PUBLIC HEARINGS - ITEM 2B)
DEVELOPMENT 1995 community Development Block Grant Provram.
BLOCK GRANT This date has been set for a public hearing to
consider adoption of the proposed 1995 Community
Development Block Grant Program, including the
contingency plans for estimated entitlement
changes, as recommended by the Planning Com-
mittee and the Human Services Commission.
Betsy Czark of the Planning Department stated
that the City has received eleven applications
for funding. She noted that there has been a
revision to the list which appears in the agenda
rH
September 20, 1994
COMMUNITY packet, in that Grace Fellowship Church has
DEVELOPMENT withdrawn their application. She explained that
BLOCK GRANT funding originally recommended for them was re-
allocated to the Community Health Centers, YWCA
Domestic Violence Housing, and the King County
Housing Nike site. She outlined applications
received and the funding level recommended as
follows:
Capital Recommended
Applications Received Funding Level
Children's Therapy Centerl,4 $ 9,925
Roof replacement
City of Kent Home Repairl,4 $186,109
Services Program
City of Kent Parks & Rec.1,4 $ 53,000
Kiwanis Tot Lot #2 Rehab.
City of Kent Planning & $ 42,336
Administration
Community Health Centerl•4 $ 50,000
Design and Construction
Easter Seal of Washington 1,2,4 $ 22f425
Access Modification Rehab
Housing Unlimited' 3,4 $ 10,000
Housing for developmentally
disabled
King County Housing Authority 1,4,5 $ 33,753
Replace roofs on 31 units at
the Nike site
TOTAL $407,548
5
September 20, 1994
COMMUNITY Public (Human) Service Recommended
DEVELOPMENT Applications Received Funding Level
BLOCK GRANT
Community Health Centersof$ 20,000
King County, Kent Clinic b
Emergency Feed Program of $ 7,734
Seattle -King County 6,8
Grace Fellowship Church APPLICATION WITHDRAWN
YWCA of Seattle -King County, $ 27,000
Domestic Violence Housing6.7.8
TOTAL $ 54,734
1 Planning Committee recommendation.
2 If the City receive a decrease in capital entitlement
funds, Easter Seals' funding will be decreased by up to
$7,425 or to a minimum funding level of $15,000.
3 If the City receives a decrease in capital entitlement
funds in excess of $7,425, Housing Unlimited's funding
will be reduced by a maximum of $5,000 or to a minimum
funding level of $5,000.
4 If the City receives a decreased Capital entitlement in
excess of $12,425 the remaining decrease shall be
divided equally between all of the funded Capital
projects.
5 If the City receives an increase in capital entitlement
funds, King County Housing Authority's funding will
receive the full amount of such an increase.
6 Planning Committee and Human Services Commission
Recommendation.
7 If the City receives an increase in public service
entitlement, the increased amount shall be divided
equally between Community Health Center and YWCA
Domestic Housing.
8 If the City receives a decrease in entitlement,
subtract the first $1,219 from Community Health Center
and any remaining decrease subtract equally between the
three public service funded agencies.
6
September 20, 1994
COMMUNITY The Mayor opened the public hearing. There were
DEVELOPMENT no comments from the audience and WOODS MOVED to
BLOCK GRANT close the public hearing. Orr seconded and the
motion carried. ORR MOVED to adopt the 1995
Community Development Block Grant Program as
revised, including the contingency plans for
estimated entitlement changes, as recommended by
the Planning Committee. Woods seconded and the
motion carried.
(CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3D)
Amendment to 1994-1996 Community Development
Block Grant (CDBG) Interlocal Cooperation
Agreement. APPROVAL of Amendment No. 1 to the
1994-1996 CDBG Interlocal Cooperation Agreement
dated June 21, 1993, and authorization for the
Mayor to sign this Amendment and forward it to
King County.
(CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3E)
Amendment to 1994-1996 Home Interlocal
Cooperation Agreement. APPROVAL of Amendment
No. 1 to the 1994-1996 HOME Interlocal Coopera-
tion Agreement dated June 21, 1993, and authori-
zation for the Mayor to sign this Amendment and
forward it to King County.
ANNEXATION (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3C)
ZONING Everson Annexation Zoning. ADOPTION of
Ordinance No. 3184 designating zoning for the
Everson Annexation.
PLATS (OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4A)
Top of the Hill Preliminary Plat SU -94-2.
This date has been set to consider the Hearing
Examiner's recommendation for conditional
approval of an application by Baima & Holmberg,
Inc. for a 42 -lot single family residential
preliminary subdivision. The property is
located on the north side of SE 244th Street,
approximately 600 feet west of 104th Avenue SE.
Matt Jackson of the Planning Department noted
that area is approximately 8.74 acres, and
explained that approximately 7.25 acres was
rezoned to R1-5.0 on March 15, 1994. He added
that the Hearing Examiner recommended condi-
tional approval of the preliminary plat on
7
September 20, 1994
PLATS August 17, 1994- He noted that the conditions
are contained in the agenda packet. He ex-
plained that 38 of the lots are zoned R1-5.0
and 4 are zoned R1-7.2.
Martin Durkan, Jr., 22401 Sweeney Road, Maple
Valley, representing the owner and the engineer,
noted that the working relationship with the
Planning Department on this project has been
positive. He stated that the 5,000 sq. ft. lots
will provide medium -level homes to people who
would not qualify for a larger lot or larger
home, and will bring affordable homes to Kent
without having multi -family units.
There were no further comments from the audi-
ence. ORR MOVED to accept the findings of the
Hearing Examiner and to adopt the Hearing
Examiner's recommendation of approval with
nineteen (19) conditions of the Top of the Hill
preliminary subdivision. Woods seconded and the
motion carried.
(OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4B)
Rachael Preliminary Plat SU -94-4. This date has
been set to consider the Hearing Examiner's
recommendation for conditional approval of an
application by Brad Plemmons/Teresa Hutchens for
a 12 -lot single family residential preliminary
subdivision. The property is located west of
Fifth Avenue S., approximately 100 feet south of
West Crow Street.
ORR MOVED to accept the findings of the Hearing
Examiner and to adopt the Hearing Examiner's
recommendation of approval with twenty (20)
conditions of the Rachael Place preliminary
subdivision. Woods seconded and the motion
carried.
(OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4C)
Harvey Final Plat FSU -90-3. This date has been
set to continue consideration of an application
for the Harvey Final Plat. This was discussed
at the Council meeting of September 6, 1994.
The subject property is 2.25 acres in size and
is located north of S. 252nd Street, between
22nd Avenue S. and 25th Avenue S. Council
9
September 20, 1994
COMMUNITY The Mayor opened the public hearing. There were
DEVELOPMENT no comments from the audience and WOODS MOVED to
BLOCK GRANT close the public hearing. Orr seconded and the
motion carried. ORR MOVED to adopt the 1995
Community Development Block Grant Program as
revised, including the contingency plans for
estimated entitlement changes, as recommended by
the Planning Committee. Woods seconded and the
motion carried.
(CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3D)
+„ 10oe-1o4F community Development
Agreement. APPROVAL of Amendment No. 1 to the
1994-1996 CDBG Interlocal Cooperation Agreement
dated June 21, 1993, and authorization for the
Mayor to sign this Amendment and forward it to
King County.
(CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3E)
Amendment to 1994-1996 Home Interlocal
cooperation Agreement. APPROVAL of Amendment
No. 1 to the 1994-1996 HOME Interlocal Coopera-
tion Agreement dated June 21, 1993, and authori-
zation for the Mayor to sign this Amendment and
forward it to King County.
ANNEXATION (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3C)
ZONING Everson Annexation Zoning. ADOPTION of
Ordinance No. 3184 designating zoning for the
Everson Annexation.
PLATS (OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4A)
Top of the Hill Preliminary Plat SU -94-2.
This date has been set to consider the Hearing
Examiner's recommendation for conditional
approval of an application by Baima & Holmberg,
Inc. for a 42 -lot single family residential
preliminary subdivision. The property is
located on the north side of SE 244th Street,
approximately 600 feet west of 104th Avenue SE..
Matt Jackson of the Planning Department noted
that area is approximately 8.74 acres, and
explained that approximately 7.25 acres was
rezoned to R1-5.0 on March 15, 1994. He added
that the Hearing Examiner recommended condi-
tional approval of the preliminary plat on
f[I
PLATS August 17, 1994- He noted
are contained in the agenda
plained that 38 of the lots
and 4 are zoned R1-7.2.
September 20, 1994
that the conditions
packet. He ex -
are zoned R1-5.0
Martin Durkan, Jr., 22401 Sweeney Road, Maple
Valley, representing the owner and the engineer,
noted that the working relationship with the
Planning Department on this project has been
positive. He stated that the 5,000 sq. ft. lots
will provide medium -level homes to people who
would not qualify for a larger lot or larger
home, and will bring affordable homes to Kent
without having multi -family units.
There were no further comments from the audi-
ence. ORR MOVED to accept the findings of the
Hearing Examiner and to adopt the Hearing
Examiner's recommendation of approval with
nineteen (19) conditions of the Top of the Hill
preliminary subdivision. Woods seconded and the
motion carried.
(OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4B)
Rachael Preliminary Plat SU -94-4. This date has
been set to consider the Hearing Examiner's
recommendation for conditional approval of an
application by Brad Plemmons/Teresa Hutchens for
a 12 -lot single family residential preliminary
subdivision. The property is located west of
Fifth Avenue S., approximately 100 feet south of
West Crow Street.
ORR MOVED to accept the findings of the Hearing
Examiner and to adopt the Hearing Examiner's
recommendation of approval with twenty (20)
conditions of the Rachael Place preliminary
subdivision. Woods seconded and the motion
carried.
(OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4C)
Harvey Final Plat FSU -90-3. This date has been
set to continue consideration of an application
for the Harvey Final Plat. This was discussed
at the Council meeting of September 6, 1994.
The subject property is 2.25 acres in size and
is located north of S. 252nd Street, between
22nd Avenue S. and 25th Avenue S. Council
9
September 20, 1994
PLATS approved the Harvey preliminary plat on
September 18, 1990.
Wickstrom noted that Public Works and Planning
met with Mr. Mott on September 16th and reviewed
his fence line encroachment and drainage issues.
He noted that an agreement has been developed
which would enable the City to enforce the main-
tenance and operation of the private drainage
swale that surrounds the property and protects
the adjacent property owners from surface water
runoff from this plat. He recommended that in
order to avoid delays, the plat be approved
subject to his concurrence with the resolution
of the issues.
Bill Hind of Lacey, Engineer of Record for the
subdivision representing Mr. Gross, said he has
the quit claim deed for the fence encroachment
and the tax affidavit which Mr. Mott needs to
sign. He added that Mr. and Mrs. Gross have
signed the quit claim deed and the tax affi-
davit, as well as the covenant. He added that
Wickstrom will need to sign the covenant.
Mr. Mott thanked everyone involved in this issue
and was told that he would receive copies of the
documents after they have been executed. Mayor
White and Councilmember Orr also thanked all who
were involved for their efforts. ORR THEN MOVED
to approve the Harvey Final Plat subject to the
Public Work's Director's concurrence with the
resolution of the title and drainage issues.
Woods seconded and the motion carried.
MORATORIUM (OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4D)
Adult Entertainment - Land Use Moratorium
Emergency Ordinance. The City was recently
involved in litigation regarding the placement
of an adult use facility within the City. The
judge's ruling held that the Zoning Code pro-
visions relating to adult use facilities were
constitutional, however, did not allow for
enough alternative sites for the location of
these facilities. To comply with this ruling,
the Zoning Code will have to be amended to allow
for additional sites within the City. In order
to provide an opportunity to review and amend
the Code, staff recommends that a moratorium be
0
September 20, 1994
MORATORIUM adopted on the issuance of permits and accep-
tance of applications for permits for these
facilities.
Mayor White noted that he has asked staff to
look at ways to regulate this type of activity.
City Attorney Lubovich explained that the pro-
posed ordinance establishes a moratorium on the
receiving of applications and issuing of permits
for the location of these facilities. He noted
that the Zoning Code requires siting of a dis-
tance of 1000' from parks, schools, churches,
libraries, residential zones and residential
uses. He added that the recent challenge was to
the residential use, which are non -conforming
uses in commercial zones. He reiterated that
the court held that there were not enough sites
for these facilities in the City. He explained
that the City cannot prohibit the location of
these facilities through zoning, but that it can
regulate them. He voiced concern that applica-
tions will be filed for sites, and under the
current Code they would not be allowed because
there are not enough sites available and they
would not meet the setback requirements.
Lubovich read the proposed ordinance aloud and
noted that it requires the vote of the majority
plus one, or five Councilmembers, and pointed
out that two Councilmembers are not in atten-
dance tonight. He stated that, if adopted, the
ordinance will go into effect immediately. He
noted that the court has already ruled on the
location of the application which was litigated,
and the concern is that other sites may be
applied for which would have to be denied,
resulting in court action. He felt the
moratorium is critical so that the City can
study the ordinance and obtain recommendations
from the Planning Commission.
Lubovich explained that a hearing must be held
within sixty days of adoption of an ordinance
enacting a moratorium, and recommended holding
the hearing as soon as possible. He also recom-
mended that the Planning Commission be asked to
look at the zoning aspects of the issue.
JOHNSON MOVED to adopt emergency Ordinance
10
MORATORIUM No. 3185 establishing a
the issuance of permits
applications for permits
ties, and that a hearing
October 4, 1994, on the
use moratorium. Houser
September 20, 1994
land use moratorium on
and the acceptance of
for adult use facili-
be scheduled for
establishment of a land
seconded.
Mann expressed anger and frustration about this
issue, noting that there is no recourse. He
said the court's direction is ambiguous, and
that he feels the 1000' setback in the Code is
right. Mayor White stated that the research
being done by the legal staff in regard to the
business license criteria may result in an
opportunity to discuss this in court. He said
the criteria will be very strict and that
businesses of this type may not want to operate
in the City of Kent or may challenge the City's
proposal.
WOODS MOVED to make a letter from Janette Nuss
on this subject a part of the record. Orr
seconded and the motion carried.
There were no comments from the audience, and
the motion to adopt Ordinance No. 3185 carried
unanimously. It was clarified that the Planning
Commission is directed to review this issue and
make recommendations to the Council.
COUNCIL (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3J)
Councilmember Absence. APPROVAL of requests for
excused absences for Councilmembers Tim Clark
and Jim Bennett from the September 20, 1994,
City Council meeting. Both will be out of town
and unable to attend.
FIRE (BIDS - ITEM 5D)
DEPARTMENT Paint Bids Fire Facilities. As a result of
fiscal constraints and overall city priorities
during the last couple of years, painting and
related maintenance to several Fire Department
buildings had to be deferred, which resulted in
deterioration of the buildings, particularly on
the East Hill. The buildings were evaluated by
outside contractors and bids were let. No bids
were received. Feedback indicates the need for
11
September 20, 1994
FIRE painting of the buildings to avoid further
DEPARTMENT deterioration and long term followup actions
were recommended to mitigate the deterioration
of the East Hill site.
The City Attorney's Office has determined that
the City can now enter into negotiations with
qualified contractors. It is being proposed,
based on the limited time frame and funds avail-
able, that all the sites be painted as soon as
possible and that a long term solution for the
East Hill site be phased in. It is anticipated
that the existing CIP painting budget and funds
from the Fire Station Emergency Generator pro-
ject would cover the painting and first phase of
the East Hill deterioration mitigation and
contingencies.
WOODS MOVED that the Fire Department be author-
ized to enter into negotiations for contracts to
paint the fire facilities and the first phase of
mitigation of the East Hill site deterioration;
that the Mayor be authorized to sign the con-
tract after review and approval by the City
Attorney; and that $30,000 be transferred from
the Emergency Generator project to the Building
Painting CIP project. Johnson seconded and the
motion carried.
PARKS & (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3K)
RECREATION Parks Projects - Budget Change. APPROVAL of a
budget change of $8,851 for three parks pro-
jects, as recommended by the Operations
Committee at their September 14th meeting. This
will enable the Parks Department to close the
projects and cover a minor deficit in the East
Hill Parks Project. The adjustment is needed to
recognize the earned revenue and provide for the
necessary transfers.
(BIDS - ITEM 5B)
Rent Memorial Park Baseball Field Illumination
Rehabilitation. Three bids were received for
the Kent Memorial Baseball Field Illumination
Rehabilitation Project. RMA Lighting Inc. of
Redmond was the low bidder at $58,284. The
engineer's estimate was $64,746. HOUSER MOVED
that the bid for the Kent Memorial Park Baseball
12
September 20, 1994
PARKS & Field Illumination Rehabilitation Project be
RECREATION awarded to RMA Lighting, Inc. in the amount of
$58,284.00. Woods seconded and the motion
carried.
FINANCE (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3B)
Approval of Bills. APPROVAL of payment of the
bills received through August 31, 1994 and paid
through August 31, 1994 after auditing by the
Operations Committee on September 14, 1994.
Approval of checks issued for vouchers:
Date Check Numbers Amount
8/16/94-8/31/94 146289-146839 $1,717,758.15
Approval of checks issued for payroll for
August 16 through August 31, 1994 and paid on
September 2, 1994:
Date Check Numbers Amount
9/2/94 Checks 197442-197760 $ 269,116.73
Advices 17706-18071 $ 419,105.61
$ 688,222.34
(CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3G)
LID 327 - Segregation of Assessment. ADOPTION
of Resolution No. 1404 authorizing the segrega-
tion of Assessment #7 in LID 327, as recommended
by the Public Works Committee. The property is
being divided into two parcels for which the
assessment is to be distributed accordingly.
(CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3H)
LID 330 - Segregation of Assessment. ADOPTION
of Resolution No. 1405 authorizing the segrega-
tion of Assessment #45 in LID 330, as recom-
mended by the Public Works Committee. The
property is being divided into two parcels for
which the assessment is to be distributed
accordingly.
(CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3L)
1994 Youth Conference - Budget Adjustment.
AUTHORIZATION to establish a budget of $10,000
for the Police Department "Game of Life" Youth
Conference, as recommended by the Operations
13
September 20, 1994
FINANCE Committee at their September 14th meeting.
Funds for this seventh year event are provided
by Drinking Driver Task Force, Washington
Traffic Safety Commission Grant, Kent School
District, the BEER Institute and the Auburn
School District.
(CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3M)
Morrill House Demolition - Budget Change.
AUTHORIZATION to provide a budget change of
$8,023.50 needed to demolish the main house at
the Morrill property, as recommended by the
operations Committee at their September 14,
1994. The Committee recommends this house be
demolished at the same time as the others since
the code inspection has deemed it uninhabitable
in its present condition. Funds would come from
the CIP fund balance, leaving a balance of
$253,031.
REPORTS Parks Committee. Houser announced that the
City's Wellness Committee is sponsoring an on-
going food drive to benefit the Kent Food Bank,
and encouraged everyone to donate produce and
non-perishable items.
ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 8:00 P.M.
Ci.c-o�-•��Ph/
Brenda Jac e , CMC
City Cler
14
Kent City Council Meeting
Date October 4, 1994
Category Consent Calendar
CREATION OF LID 346 - S. 212TH STREET IMPROVEMENTS -
ORDINANCE flaw
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by Council Adoption of
Ordinance No. 313(o fore Local Improvement District 346
for the improvement of S. 212th Street Sidewalk, Street
Lighting and Sanitary Sewer service to specific parcels
3. EXHIBITS: Ordinance, Public Works Director memorandum and
vicinity map
4. RECOMMENDED BY: Council Action
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED:
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember,
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
econds
Council Agenda
Item No. 3C
CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE ordering the installation of sidewalks
and street lighting along S. 212th Street between SR 167
and the Green River in areas where those facilities do
not exist, including minor sewer and water improvements,
all in accordance with Resolution No. 1402 of the City
Council; establishing Local Improvement District No. 346
and ordering the carrying out of the proposed
improvement; providing that payment for the improvement
be made in part by special assessments upon the property
in the District, payable by the mode of "payment by
bonds"; and providing for the issuance and sale of local
improvement district warrants redeemable in cash or other
short-term financing and local improvement district
bonds.
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 1402 adopted August 16, 1994, the
City Council declared its intention to order the installation of
sidewalks and street lighting along S. 212th Street between SR 167
and the Green River in areas where those facilities do not exist,
including minor sewer and water improvements, and fixed
September 20, 1994, at 7:00 p.m., local time, in the Council
Chambers of the City Hall as the time and place for hearing all
matters relating to the proposed improvement and all comments
thereon and objections thereto and for determining the method of
payment for the improvement; and
WHEREAS, the City's Director of Public Works caused an
estimate to be made of the cost and expense of the proposed
improvement and certified that estimate to the City Council,
together with all papers and information in his possession touching
the proposed improvement, a description of the boundaries of the
proposed local improvement district and a statement of what portion
of the cost and expense of the improvement should be borne by the
property within the proposed district; and
0152111.01
WHEREAS, that estimate is accompanied by a diagram of the
proposed improvement showing thereon the lots, tracts, parcels of
land, and other property which will be specially benefited by the
proposed improvement and the estimated cost and expense thereof to
be borne by each lot, tract and parcel of land or other property;
and
WHEREAS, due notice of the above hearing was given in the
manner provided by law, and the hearing was held by the City
Council on the date and at the time above mentioned, and all
objections to the proposed improvement were duly considered and
overruled by the City Council, and all persons appearing at such
hearing and wishing to be heard were heard; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined it to be in the best
interests of the City that the improvement as hereinafter described
be carried out and that a local improvement district be created in
connection therewith; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN
as follows:
Section 1. The City Council of the City of Kent, Washington
(the "City"), orders the following improvements:
(a) The installation of sidewalks and street
lighting along S. 212th Street between SR 167 and the
Green River in areas where those facilities do not exist;
(b) The installation of a sanitary sewer line on S.
212th Street running from approximately 76th Avenue South
to 500 feet west of 76th Avenue South; and
(c) The installation of a water stub on S. 212th
Street 1100 feet west of 84th Avenue South.
All of the foregoing shall be in accordance with the plans and
specifications therefor prepared by the Director of Public Works of
0152111.01
-2-
the City, and may be modified by the City Council as long as such
modification does not affect the purpose of the improvements.
Section 2. There is created and established a local
improvement district to be called Local Improvement District
No. 346 of the City of Kent, Washington (the "District"), the
boundaries or territorial extent of the District being more
particularly described in Exhibit A attached hereto and by this
reference incorporated herein.
Section 3. The total estimated cost and expense of the
improvement is declared to be $3,789,000. Approximately $673,565
of the cost and expense shall be borne by and assessed against the
property specially benefited by such improvement included in the
District which embraces as nearly as practicable all property
specially benefited by such improvement and the balance of such
cost and expense shall be paid by the City.
Section 4. In accordance with the provisions of RCW
35.44.047, the City may use any method or combination of methods to
compute assessments which may be deemed to fairly reflect the
special benefits to the properties being assessed.
Section 5. Local improvement district warrants may be issued
in payment of the cost and expense of the improvement herein
ordered to be assessed, such warrants to be paid out of the Local
Improvement Fund, District No. 346, hereinafter created and
referred to as the Local Improvement Fund, and, until the bonds
referred to in this section are issued and delivered to the
purchaser thereof, to bear interest from the date thereof at a rate
to be established hereafter by the Finance Division Director of the
City, as issuing officer, and to be redeemed in cash and/or by
0152111.01
-3-
local improvement district bonds herein authorized to be issued,
such interest-bearing warrants to be hereafter referred to as
"revenue warrants." In the alternative, the City hereafter may
provide by ordinance for the issuance of other short-term
obligations pursuant to chapter 39.50 RCW.
The City is authorized to issue local improvement district
bonds for the District which shall bear interest at a rate and be
payable on or before a date to be hereafter fixed by ordinance.
The bonds shall be issued in exchange for and/or in redemption of
any and all revenue warrants issued hereunder or other short-term
obligations hereafter authorized, including the interfund loans
authorized by Section 6, and not redeemed in cash within twenty
days after the expiration of the thirty -day period for the cash
payment without interest of assessments on the assessment roll for
the District. The bonds shall be redeemed by the collection of
special assessments to be levied and assessed against the property
within the District, payable in annual installments, with interest
at a rate to be hereafter fixed by ordinance under the mode of
"payment by bonds," as defined by law and the ordinances of the
City. The exact form, amount, date, interest rate and
denominations of such bonds hereafter shall be fixed by ordinance
of the City Council. Such bonds shall be sold in such manner as
the City Council hereafter shall determine.
Section 6. For the purpose of paying all or a part of the
costs of carrying out the improvements within the District pending
the receipt of the proceeds of the issuance and sale of the bonds
or short-term obligations referred to in Section 5, interfund loans
from the General Fund, Water Fund and/or Sewer Fund to the Local
mszt».01
-4-
Improvement Fund in the maximum aggregate amount of $673,565 are
authorized and approved, those loans to be repaid on or before the
issuance of such bonds or obligations from the proceeds thereof.
Each of the interfund loans shall bear interest at a variable rate,
adjusted the fifteenth and last day of each month, equal to the
interest rate of the State of Washington Local Government
Investment Pool on the fifteenth and last day of each month. The
initial interest rate on the date of each interfund loan shall be
determined as of the last preceding interest payment adjustment
date.
Section 7. In all cases where the work necessary to be done
in connection with the making of such improvement is carried out
pursuant to contract upon competitive bids (and the City shall have
and reserves the right to reject any and all bids), the call for
bids shall include a statement that payment for such work will be
made in cash warrants drawn upon the Local Improvement Fund.
Section 8. The Local Improvement Fund for the District is
created and established in the office of the Finance Division
Director of the City. The proceeds from the sale of revenue
warrants or other short-term obligations drawn against the fund
which may be issued and sold by the City and the collections of
special assessments, interest and penalties thereon shall be
deposited in the Local Improvement Fund. Cash warrants to the
contractor or contractors in payment for the work to be done by
them in connection with the improvement and cash warrants in
payment for all other items of expense in connection with the
improvement shall be issued against the Local Improvement Fund.
0152111.01
-5-
Section 9. Within 15 days of the passage of this ordinance
there shall be filed with the Finance Division Director of the City
the title of the improvement and District number, a copy of the
diagram or print showing the boundaries of the District and the
preliminary assessment roll or abstract of such roll showing
thereon the lots, tracts and parcels of land that will be specially
benefited thereby and the estimated cost and expense of such
improvement to be borne by each lot, tract or parcel of land. The
Finance Division Director immediately shall post the proposed
assessment roll upon her index of local improvement assessments
against the properties affected by the local improvement.
Section 10. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force
five (5) days from and after its passage and five (5) days
following its publication as required by law.
ATTEST:
BRENDA JACOBER, City Clerk
APPROVED A/(S, TO �FORM:
Special Counsel and Bond
Counsel for the City
Passed the
Approved the
Published the
day of _
_ day of
day of
By
JIM WHITE, Mayor
1994.
1994.
1994.
I certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No.
passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, and
approved by the Mayor of the City of Kent as hereon indicated.
(SEAT,)
BRENDA JACOBER, City Clerk
0152111.01
-6-
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION CITY OF KENT L.I.D. NO. 346
That portion of the NW 1/4 of Section 7, Township 22 North, Range 5 East, W.M., and
of the North 1/2 of Sections 11 and 12 Township 22 North, Range 4 East, W.M.,
described as follows:
BEGINNING at the intersection of. the West line of Section 7, Township 22 North, e
Range 5 East, W.M., with the North line of the South 235 feet of the NW 1/4 of the
NW 1/4 of said Section 7;
Thence Easterly along said North line 250 feet;
Thence parallel with the West line of said Section 7 North 1 ° 13'42" East 19650 feet;
Thence South 88°46'18" East 1180 feet;
Thence South 1'13'42" West to an intersection with the Westerly margin of SR 167;
Thence Southerly along said Westerly margin to its intersection with the North line of
the South 767.62 feet of the SW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of said Section 7;
Thence Westerly along said North line to its intersection with the Easterly margin of the
East Valley Highway (84th Avenue South);
Thence Northerly along said Easterly margin to its intersection with the Easterly
extension of the South line of the North 198 feet of the SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section
12, Township 22 North, Range 4 East, W.M.,
Thence Westerly along said 256 75th Be and feet of thelts said SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 12;
terly extension to its intersection with
the West line of th
Thence Southerly along said West line to its intersection with the North line of the South
15 feet of North 1/2 of the South 1/2 of the said NE 1/4 of Section 12:
Thence Westerly along said North line to its intersection with the West line of the East
205 feet of the SW 1/4 of the said NE 1/4 of Section 12;
Thence Northerly along said West line to its intersection with the Northerly line of Tract
A, of City of Kent Short Plat No. SP -77-35 (Burlington Northern 212th St. Ind. Ctr.
Div. 1), according to short plat thereof recorded under recording No. 7810230760,
records of King County, Washington;
71662k%M.057
1 6110194
Thence Southwesterly along said Northerly line to its intersection with the West line of
said Short Plat No. SP -77-35;
Thence Westerly, at right angles to said West line, to an intersection with the Westerly
margin of the Burlington Northern Railroad Right of Way;
Thence Southerly along said Westerly margin to its intersection with the South line of
the said NE 1/4 of Section 12;
Thence Westerly along said South line to its intersection with the Easterly margin of
76th Avenue South;
Thence Northerly along said Easterly margin to its intersection with the North line of the
South 100454 feet of the North 1/2 of said Section 12;
Thence Westerly along said North line to its intersection with the West line of the East
440 feet of the NW 1/4 of said Section 12;
Thence Southerly along said West line to its intersection with a line which is 10 feet
Northwesterly of when measured at right angles and parallel with the centerline of the
Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad lead track;
Thence Southwesterly along said parallel line to its intersection with the South line of
the said NW 1/4 of Section 12; -
Thence Westerly along said South line to its intersection with the East line, of City of
Kent Short Plat No. SPC -81-3 (Hallmark), according to short plat thereof recorded under
recording No. 8103260410, records of King County, Washington;
Thence Northerly along said East line and its Northerly extension to a point
which is 64.7 feet North of the Northeast comer of Lot 1, said Short Plat No. SPC -81-3;
Thence Westerly to a point on the Easterly margin of 72nd Avenue South which is 60.84
feet North of the Northwest comer of said Lot 1;
Thence continuing Westerly to an intersection with the Westerly margin of 72nd Avenue
South;
Thence Southerly along said Westerly margin to its intersection with the South line of
the North 1/2 of the SW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of said Section 12;
Thence Westerlyalongsaid South line and its Westerly extension to its intersection with
the Westerly margin of the West Valley Highway (68th Avenue South);
71662k9".= 2 encs+
Thence Northerly along said Westerly margin its intersection with the North line of
Lot 5, of City of Kent Short Plat No. SPC -88-6 (Greenriver Square One), according to
short plat thereof recorded under recording No. 8812020383, records of King County,
Washington;
Thence Westerly along said North line to its intersection with the West line of said
Lot 5; _
Thence Southerly along said West line to its intersection with the South line of Lot 4,
said Short Plat No. SPC -88-6
Thence Westerly along said South line to its intersection with the West line of said
Lot 4;
Thence Northerly along said West line to its intersection with the South line of Lot 1,
said Short Plat No. SPC -88-6;
Thence Westerly along said South line and its Westerly extension to its intersection with
the West line of the East 56 feet of the SW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 11, Township
22 North, Range 4 East, W.M.,
Thence Southerly along said West line to its intersection with the South line of Lot 2, of
City of Kent Short Plat No. SPC -89-10 (Van Doren's Landing II) according to short plat
thereof recorded under recording No. 8910241400, records of King County, Washington;
Thence Westerly along said South line and its Westerly extension to its intersection with
the West line of the SE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of said Section 11;
Thence Northerly along said West line to its intersection with the Easterly margin of
Russell Road South;
Thence Northerly along said Easterly margin to its intersection with the North line of the
South 1/2 of the North 1/2 of said Section 11;
Thence Easterly along said North line to its intersection with the East line of said
Section 11 which is also the West line of said Section 12; -
Thence Northerly along said West line to its intersection with the Westerly extension of
the South line of Lot 1, of City of Kent Short Plat No. SPC -76-12 (Montgomery),
according to short plat thereof recorded under recording No. 7611010661, records of
King County, Washington;
71667%94W.O" 3 W101%
Thence Easterly along said South line and it Westerly extension to its intersection with
the West line of Lot 51 of Daon Addition, according to plat thereof recorded in volume
116 of plats, pages 57 through 59, records of King County, Washington;
Thence Southerly along said West line to its intersection with the South line of said
Lot 5;
Thence Easterly along said South line to its intersection with the West line of Lot 7 said
Daon Addition;
Thence Southerly along said West line to its intersection with the South line of said
Lot 7;
Thence Easterly along said South line and its Easterly extension to its intersection with
the West line of Lot 1, of City of Kent Short Plat No. SPC -80-6 (Northwest Distribution),
according to short plat thereof recorded under recording No. 8003260556, records of
King County, Washington;
Thence Northerly along said West line to its intersection with the North line of said
Lot 1;
Thence Easterly along said North line and its Easterly extension to its intersection with
the West line of Parcel A, of city of Kent Short Plat No. SPC -75-6 (BJ.M.S.), according
to short plat thereof recorded under recording No. 7506250505, records of King County,
Washington;
Thence Northerly along said West line to its intersection with the North line of said
Parcel A;
Thence Easterly along said North line to its intersection with the West line of the NW
1/4 of the NE 1/4 of said Section 12;
Thence Southerly along said West line to its intersection with the North line of the South
200 feet of the said NW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 12;
Thence Easterly along said North line to its intersection with the East line -of -the West
120 feet of the said NW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 12;
Thence Southerly along said East line to its intersection with the North line of the South
150 feet of the said NW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 12;
Thence Easterly along said North line to its intersection with the Westerly margin of
77th Avenue South;
71662\94M.OV
4 w10t%4
Thence Northerly along said Westerly margin to its intersection with the Westerly
extension of the North line of Lot 3, Block A, of Town of Van, according to plat thereof
recorded in volume 3 of plats, page 183, records of King County, Washington;
Thence Easterly along said North line and its Westerly and Easterly extensions to its
intersection with the Easterly margin of the Burlington Northern Railroad Right of Way;
Thence North 6°02'18" West along said Easterly margin 138.23 feet;
Thence South 89°04'38" East 850.76 feet
Thence North 0°55'22" East 774.00 feet
Thence South 89°04'38" East 831.42 feet
Thence South 0°55'22" West 749.43 feet
Thence South 89°04'38" East 336.71 feet to an intersection with the Westerly margin of
the East Valley Highway (84th Avenue South);
Thence Southerly along said Westerly margin to its intersection with the Westerly
extension of the North line of the South 235 feet of the NW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of said
Section 7;
Thence Easterly along said Westerly extension 4o its intersection with the East line of
said Section 11 which is the same as the West line of said Section 7 and the POINT OF
BEGINNING.
7MM94M.07 5 611 OM
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
September 15, 1994
TO: Mayor White and City Council
FROM:
Don Wickstrom Director of Public Works
RE: LID 346 - South 212th Street Sidewalk, Street Lighting and Sanitary Sewer
(Green River to SR 167)
September 20, 1994 has been set for the formation public hearing for the above
referenced project.
BACKGROUND
The City has obtained a grant from the Washington State Transportation Improvement
Board to construct high -occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes along S. 212th St. between West
Valley Highway (SR 181) and SR 167. The S. 212th St. HOV lanes will connect with the
new HOV lanes along SR 167 and future HOV lanes proposed by King County along S.
212th/208th St. up to Benson Road.
The HOV project consists of widening S. 212th St. from 5 lanes to 7 lanes, installation of
curbs, gutters, storm drainage and traffic signal improvements.
In addition, a new pedestrian signal will be installed where the Interurban Trail crosses S.
212th St. An ISTEA grant was awarded to the City for construction of this signal.
Currently, no sidewalks or street lighting exist along most of S. 212th St. between the
Green River and SR 167. Two major north -south pedestrian/bicycle routes exist along
Frager Road and Russell Road. S. 212th St. has been identified as an east -west
pedestrian/bicycle route to connect the trails along the Green River, the Interurban Trail
and businesses along S. 212th St.
Several parcels along the north side of S. 212th St. between the Union Pacific Railroad
tracks and 77th Ave. S. do not have sanitary sewer service. The remainder of the
properties along S. 212th St. are sewered.
One parcel, Continental Hardwood Co. does not have a separate water stub to their
property. This was due to Benaroya Business Park selling this building without properly
providing the necessary water connection to the City main.
As part of the road widening project it is advantageous to include all necessary
improvements in the road project. This eliminates the need to disturb the street and
adjacent properties again. Substantial cost savings also are gained by including the
sidewalks, street lighting, sewer and water improvements in a large road widening project.
It now appears to be a logical and appropriate time to pursue the formation of this LID.
An informal property owner meeting was held on May 2, 1994. Property owner response
was positive with only 3 of the 51 parcels objecting to the LID. The owners have signed
covenants representing 14% of the property for sidewalks and 38% for street lighting. A
property owner representing 50% of the sanitary sewer assessments has written a letter
requesting to be included in the LID.
NEED FOR IMPROVEMENT
A. Sidewalks - Currently no sidewalks exist along most of S. 212th Street. Much of
the area where sidewalks should be are warn with pedestrian trails. Installation of
sidewalks will improve pedestrian safety to the adjacent businesses and physically
connect them to existing pedestrian and recreational facilities along the Green
River and the Interurban Trail. It will also make the adjacent businesses more
accessible to each other along with making bus service more viable to their
employees.
B. Street Lighting - Currently street illumination exists only at intersections and along
S. 212th St. between 84th Ave. S. and SR 167. Installation of street lighting will
provide for pedestrian and vehicle safety to the adjacent businesses patrons and
employees.
C. Utilities - Several properties on the north side of S. 212th St. between the UPRR
and 77th Ave. S. are not connected to sanitary sewer. One parcel east of the
BNRR is not connected to an individual water stub. Prior to widening the roadway,
these utilities must be extended outside the roadway section to avoid future
excavation within the roadway. Future excavation within the paved surface of S.
212th St. will be strongly discouraged if not prohibited. Therefore, the construction
must take place before the HOV lanes are constructed.
PROPOSEDIMPROVEMENTS
The project consists of the following features:
1. Installing sidewalks where there are none.
2. Install street lighting in areas where there currently is none.
3. Topsoil and hydroseeding.
4. Install sanitary sewer to lots currently not served by sewer.
5. Install water stub to lot which currently has joint service.
To minimize costs, various typical improvement features were not included. Not included
are landscaping (street trees) and undergrounding of electrical facilities. Also, existing
sidewalks shall be utilized except at the corners where reconstruction is required.
PROJECT FUNDING
This project is proposed to be funded 100% by the Local Improvement District method
except for the sewer stubs east of 76th Ave. S. This sewer stub will be funded initially by
the City. A charge in lieu of assessment will then be established which the property
owners will pay upon connection.
LID assessments: $673,565
Sewer fund: 35.000
Total Project Cost $708,565
METHOD OF ASSESSMENT
The costs for this street improvement will be distributed to each benefitting property owner
as follows:
The total sidewalk and street lighting assessments are based upon frontage along S. 212th
Street. Properties with existing sidewalks or street lighting are not being assessed for
these facilities.
The costs for water and sanitary sewer service stubouts will be charged totally against the
benefitting property.
Final assessments are based upon the total project costs. This means that the final
assessment figure may be either slightly higher or lower than the figures shown on the
preliminary assessment roll.
Upon Council passing, the ordinance confirming the final assessment roll (after completion
of the construction), there is a 30 -day period in which any portion or all of the assessment
can be paid without interest charges. After the 30 -day period, the balance is paid over a
ten year period wherein each year's payment is 1110th of the principal plus interest on the
unpaid balance. The interest will be what the market dictates.
EASEMENT AND RIGHT -OF -ACQUISITION
The construction of this street improvement project will require property acquisition along
the portions of the project in order to provide the necessary right-of-way needed in excess
of the right-of-way now owned by the City. Slope easements and construction easements
will also be required. Each property owner involved will be advised of the appraised value
of these right-of-way and easement parcels during negotiations between the City and the
owner.
SUPPORT FOR LID
To approve an LID, property owners with combined LID assessments representing 40%
of the total assessment total must support the LID.
The City has determined that owners with a combined 33.6 percent of the total LID
assessments are at this time obligated to participate in this street improvements LID via
executed no -protest covenants or letters requesting service. The final decision of whether
or not to form the LID, however, will be made by the City Council.
ENVIRONMENTAL
On April 28, 1994, the Kent Planning Department issued a DNS for LID 346 and the S.
212th St. HOV project which includes LID 346 improvements.
ooai.a
s
9909 I =FRR`f R\'
1 N
= I
i,
WEU � r
2' U a r
-6a G 0 I7 0
N
_
I
I
RI
2NO AVE
fNTEPUfIBP "✓ TPf IC G
76TH AVE s
"I ASH AVE 5 ---. - --
- o
I1 -- BOTH RVE fJ
81ST RVE S
Nil
E. VALLEY HHY,
x
J
i i : GARR/SON CREEK
1. SUBJECT:
SUMMARY STATEMENT: [`'� approved by the Operations Committee.
Adoption of Ordinance No. 3 and ppr val of an administra
tive policy amending the City's procurement code to allow for
more efficient and cost effective purchasing while maintaining
ccountabilit The proposed procurement policies are divided
i� an or Ina ce for larger purchases and an administrative
policy for smaller purchases. Th _tt, ,, ,
rutin—thp basic -previsions of +hc nrnposed nrnr
0606
KF
3.
4.
5.
M
7.
Kent City Council Meeting
Date October 4, 1994
Category Consent Calendar
PROCUREMENT POLICIES - ORDINANCE EJ W
EXHIBITS: Memorandum and ordinance
RECOMMENDED BY: Operations Committee
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED:
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 3D
CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Council
FROM: Roger Lubovich, City Attorney
DATE: September 23, 1994
SUBJECT: PROCUREMENT CODE AND POLICIES
Enclosed with the memo are the proposed procurement ordinance,
the administrative procurement policy for smaller purchases, and
the current procurement code. The proposed procurement policies
are divided into an ordinance for larger purchases and an
administrative policy for smaller purchases. The main features
of the current proposal is as follows:
Departments may make purchases under $10,000 without bidding and
without Council approval or approval from the mayor. For
purchases from $10,000 to $25,000, departments shall solicit
three (3) telephone and/or written bids or quotations. For
purchases from $25,000 to $50,000, departments must, in writing,
request written bids for each purchase. For purchases $50,000
and above, departments must, under the proposed ordinance, seek
advertised bids or proposals.
The bidding requirements under the proposed policies do not apply
to contracts for Public Works or architectural and engineering
services, both of which are covered by statute. Public Works and
architectural contracts however, are subject to the authorization
requirements; (mayor authorization for purchases over $10,000 and
council authorization for purchases $25,000 or more; $35,000 for
public works contracts). Professional and consultant contracts
are not required to be bid but may be negotiated. Proposals may
entertained for supply contracts where a supplier provides an
undetermined quantity or type of product. The mayor may waive
the bidding requirements in the event it is clearly in the City's
best interest to do so.
E
Below is a comparison of the current procurement policy set forth
in Chapter 3.60 of the Kent City Code and the proposed
procurement policies set forth in the attached proposed ordinance
and administrative policy.
Current Procurement Code
1. Departments may make
purchases for $7,500 or less
without bidding or mayor or
council authorization.
2. For purchases over $7,500,
to and including $15,000,
departments shall attempt to
solicit and document at least
three (3) telephone and/or
written bids or quotations.
3. For purchases of $15,000
or more, departments shall
advertise for bids or requests
for proposals.
4. For purchases exceeding
$7,500, the mayor's
authorization is required.
For purchases over $15,000,
the council's authorization is
required.
Proposed Procurement Code and
Policy
1. Departments may make
purchases under $10,000
without bidding or mayor or
council authorization.
2. For purchases of $10,000
to $25,000, departments shall
attempt to solicit and
document at least three (3)
telephone and/or written bids
or quotations.
3. For purchases of $25,000
to $50,000, departments shall,
in writing, request written
bids from three (3) suppliers.
For purchases of $50,000 or
more, departments shall
advertise for bids or requests
for proposals.
4. For purchases of $10,000
or more, the mayor's
authorization is required.
For purchases of $25,000 or
more ($35,000 for public
works), council's
authorization is required.
�cxaa�re.mPnn
S. Professional and
S. Professional and
consultant service contracts
consultant service contracts
are not required to be bid but
are not required to be bid but
may be negotiated. Mayor's
may be negotiated. Mayor's
authorization is required for
authorization is required for
contracts of $10,000 or more.
contracts over $7,500.
Council's authorization is
Council authorization is not
required for contracts of
required.
$25,000 or more ($35,000 for
public works).
6. Public Works and
6. Public Works and
architectural contracts are
architectural contracts are
not covered under this code.
not covered under this code
with the exception of the
authorization requirements of
the mayor and council.
7. Supply contracts are not
7. In lieu of requesting bids
specifically authorized.
or quotations for each
purchase, the City may solicit
bids or proposals for supply
contracts where the specific
product line or volume is
undetermined.
8. The bidding or advertised
8. The bidding or advertised
bid requirements may be waived
bid requirements may be waived
by the City Administration or
by the mayor.
applicable department head.
9. Contract reporting and
9. No reporting or disclosure
disclosure statement
requirements for professional
requirements for professional
and consultant contracts.
and consultant contracts.
�cxaa�re.mPnn
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the
City of Kent, Washington, repealing Chapter
3.60 and establishing a new Chapter 3.70,
relating to procurement contracts.
WHEREAS, the City of Kent adopted a procurement code
currently codified in Chapter 3.60 of the Kent City Code to
establish guidelines for the procurement of goods and services by
the City; and
WHEREAS, the procurement code has since been amended to
add reporting and disclosure procedures for purchases; and
WHEREAS, the requirements of the procurement code are
burdensome, costly, and on many occasions have caused delays in
purchases; and
WHEREAS, it is desirable to repeal Chapter 3.60 of the
code and to enact a new procurement code to allow for more
efficient and cost effective purchasing while maintaining
accountability; NOW, THEREFORE,
/111ccux ~nl'
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES
HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Kent City Code Chapter 3.60 entitled
"Procurement Contracts" (Ordinances 3024 and 3106) is hereby
repealed in its entirety:
SECTION 2. There is hereby added to the Kent City
Code, a new chapter, 3.70, entitled "Procurement Contracts" to
read as follows:
CHAPTER 3.70. PROCUREMENT CONTRACTS
Sec. 3.70.010. Purpose.
It is the purpose of this ordinance to provide guidelines
for the purchase of goods and services by the City in order to
maintain an accountable procurement process. It is also the
purpose of this ordinance to allow for the flexible application
of these guidelines for more efficient and cost effective
purchases where their strict application would not be in the
City's best interest, such as, for example, in those instances
where bids would not be appropriate due to a sole source supplier
or where negotiations with a particular supplier would be more
appropriate due to a specialized need of the City.
R,
Sec. 3.70.020. Applicability.
A. Any contract, written or oral, for the purchase of
materials, supplies, equipment or services or the lease or rental
of equipment ("purchase or "procurement"), the estimated cost of
which will be fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) or more, shall
be subject to the provisions of this chapter.
B. For purchases under fifty thousand dollars
($50,000.00), the mayor is hereby authorized to promulgate
procurement policies and guidelines, and such purchases shall not
be subject to the provisions of this chapter, except for Section
3.70.050 below relating to council authorization for purchases.
All procurement policies and guidelines promulgated by the mayor,
and any amendments thereto, shall be subject to the review and
approval of the city council.
C. Except for Section 3.70.050 below relating to council
authorization, the limitations contained in this chapter shall
not apply to:
1. Public works or improvement contracts governed
pursuant to Section 35.22.620 RCW;
2. Contracts for architectural and engineering
services governed pursuant to Chapter 39.80 RCW.
3. Purchases of materials at auctions conducted by
the United States government or any agency thereof, or by the
State of Washington and any of its political subdivisions.
3
D. Contract as used in this chapter shall mean formal
written contract, purchase order, verbal agreement, cash or
credit purchase from a wholesaler, retailer or dealer, or other
similar transaction. Contracts may not be split to avoid the
bidding and authorization requirements set forth in this chapter.
Sec. 3.70.030. Advertised bids.
If it appears that the estimated cost of a contract to
purchase, lease or rent supplies, materials, equipment or
services, will be fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) or more,
then, at least ten (10) days before entering into that contract,
the city shall publish notice calling for sealed bids in a
newspaper of general circulation most likely to bring responsive
bids. The notice shall generally state the nature of the
contemplated purchase, lease or rental agreement and the
description or specifications therefor, and it shall require that
the bids or proposals be sealed and filed with the city clerk
within the time specified therein. The city council shall let
the contract to the lowest and best responsible bidder or may
reject any or all bids or proposals and/or further call for bids
or proposals. A bid conducted by another public agency for
substantially the same purchase shall constitute compliance with
the bid requirements herein.
F11
Sec. 3.70.040. Requests for proposals.
In lieu of advertised bids as required by this chapter,
requests for proposals may be utilized when deemed appropriate
under such terms and conditions determined suitable to meet the
needs and requirements of the particular procurement.
Sec. 3.70.050. Authorization by city council required.
Any contract twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) or
more (thirty-five thousand dollars ($35,000.00) or more for
public works and improvement contracts), intended for the
purchase, lease or rental of supplies, material, equipment or
services, must be in writing and authorized by the city council
before becoming effective and binding upon the city. When the
council has specifically considered and approved a particular
program or matter in which the amount of the contract and the
contracting parties have been identified, such as awards of bids,
funding of certain programs, authorization to purchase or to
negotiate for the purchase of a particular item or service, or
other similar program or matter, such consideration shall
constitute council authorization for the purpose of this section.
Sec. 3.70.060. Professional and consultant contracts.
This section shall apply to professional and/or technical
service consultant contracts in which the city enters into an
agreement to purchase consultant services for city government
5
from a corporation, firm, agency, individual, or group of
individuals based on their recognized experience and knowledge
within a specialized area of expertise. Contracts for
professional and consultant services are not required to follow
the procurement requirements set forth in Section 3.70.030 above,
but may be entered into through direct negotiations. All such
contracts are subject to the authorization requirements of
Section 3.70.050 above.
Sec. 3.70.070. Supply contracts.
A. To determine the cost of a contract for the purpose of
establishing the appropriate procurement procedures under this
chapter, when the contract has no definite term or unit amount,
the amount of the estimated annual cost shall be deemed the
contract cost.
B. In lieu of requesting bids for each procurement, the
city may solicit bids or proposals for a contract for a specific
term to supply goods, materials, supplies, equipment or services
on an as needed basis in those instances where the specific
service or product in a product line or volume of units is
undetermined such as the city's needs and use of office supplies.
Sec. 3.70.080. Waiver.
The procurement requirements set forth in Sections 3.70.030
above may be waived by the mayor upon a finding that either the
0
materials, supplies, equipment or services are clearly and
legitimately limited to a single source of supply within the near
vicinity, or that the materials, supplies, equipment or services
are subject to special market conditions, involve special
facilities or services, or that a bid, or the bidding
requirements of Section 3.70.030 above, would otherwise not be
practicable or in the city's best interests under the
circumstances, in which instances the purchase may be best
established by direct negotiation.
Sec. 3.70.090. Emergencies.
When any emergency requires the immediate execution of any
contract to purchase, lease or rent as described in this chapter,
upon the finding of the existence of such an emergency, the mayor
shall have the power to make and enter into such contract without
strict compliance with the procurement requirements set forth in
this chapter. The mayor or the designated department head shall
issue a written basis for the emergency determination accompanied
by a description and/or specification and cost estimate of the
contract after the commencement of the purchase.
Sec. 3.70.100. Exception for recycled products.
Nothing in the chapter shall prohibit the city from
preferentially purchasing products made from recycled materials
or products that may be recycled or reused.
7
SECTION 3. Severability. If any section, sentence,
clause or phrase of this ordinance should be held to be invalid
or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such
invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity
or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or
phrase of this ordinance.
SECTION 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall
take effect and be in force thirty (30) days from and after its
passage, approval and publication as provided by law.
JIM WEITE, MAYOR
ATTEST:
BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ROGER A. LUBOVICH, CITY ATTORNEY
PASSED day of
APPROVED day of
PUBLISHED
day of
1994.
1994.
1994.
I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance
No. passed by the City Council of the City of Kent,
Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the City of Kent as
hereon indicated.
procure4 . crd
BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK
0
(SEAL)
NUMBER: 1.1
CITY OF KENT
ADMINISTRATIVE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
EFFECTIVE DATE: November 5, 1994
SUBJECT: Procurement Policy SUPERSEDES: New
APPROVED:
1.1.01. PURPOSE
Jim White
Mayor
It is the purpose of this policy to provide guidelines for the
purchase of goods and services by the City in order to maintain
an accountable procurement process. It is also the purpose of
this policy to allow for the flexible application of these
guidelines for more efficient and cost effective purchases where
their strict application would not be in the City's best
interest, such as, for example, in those instances where bids
would not be appropriate due to a sole source supplier or where
negotiations with a particular supplier would be more appropriate
due to a specialized need of the City.
1.1.02. APPLICABILITY
Any contract, written or oral, for the purchase of materials,
supplies, equipment or services or the lease or rental of
equipment under $50,000 shall be subject to the provisions of
this chapter; provided that, except for the requirements set
forth in Section 1.1.07 below relating to authorization by the
mayor and city council, the limitations contained in this policy
do not apply to•_
1. Public works or improvement contracts;
2. Contracts for architectural and engineering services
governed pursuant to Chapter 39.80 RCW.
3. Purchases of materials at auctions conducted by the United
States government or any agency thereof, or by the State of
Washington and any of its political subdivisions. Contract
as used in this chapter shall mean formal written contract,
purchase order, verbal agreement, cash or credit purchase
from a wholesaler, retailer or dealer, or other similar
PROCUREMENT POLICY
NUMBER: 1.1
transaction. Contracts may not be split to avoid the
bidding and authorization requirements set forth in this
chapter.
1.1.03. PURCHASES UNDER $10.000.
Any contract, for which the estimated cost to purchase materials,
supplies, equipment or services or the lease or rental of
equipment is under ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00), shall be
approved and entered into pursuant to such terms and conditions
as may be authorized by the director of the department for which
the contract is made.
1.1.04. PURCHASES $10,000 TO 550,000.
A. Telephone quotations or bids - bid lists. If it appears
that the estimated cost of a contract to purchase materials,
supplies, equipment or services or the lease or rental of
equipment, other than professional and consulting services,
will be ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00) or more but less
than twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000.00), the
department director with authority or his or her designee,
shall attempt to solicit and document at least three (3)
telephone and/or written bids or quotations for the
contract. For regularly -made purchases, a list of
comparable bids or quotations may be maintained and updated
periodically and purchases made from that list without
soliciting bids or quotations for each such purchase.
B. Written request for bids. If it appears that the estimated
cost of a contract to purchase, lease or rent supplies,
materials, equipment or services, will exceed twenty-five
thousand dollars ($25,000.00) but will not exceed than fifty
thousand dollars ($50,000.00), the department director with
authority or his or her designee shall, in writing, request
from at least three (3) suppliers written bids for each
purchase.
2
NUMBER: 1.1
PROCUREMENT POLICY
1.1.05. PURCHASES $50,0.00 AND AB VE - ADVERTISED BIDS.
If it appears that the estimated cost of a contract to purchase,
lease or rent supplies, materials, equipment or services, will be
fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) or more, such contract shall
be entered into pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 3.70 of the
Kent City Code.
1.1.06. REOUESTS FOR PROPOSALS.
In lieu of requests for bids or quotations as required by this
chapter, requests for proposals may be utilized when deemed
appropriate under such terms and conditions determined suitable
to meet the needs and requirements of the particular procurement.
1.1.07. AUTHORIZATION BY MAYOR/COUNCIL REQUIRED.
Any contract which is ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00) or more
intended for the purchase, lease or rental of supplies, material,
equipment or services must be in writing, unless the mayor
determines otherwise, and approved by the mayor or his or her
designee to become effective and binding upon the city. Pursuant
to Section 3.70.050 of the Kent City Code, any such contract
which is twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) or more
(thirty-five thousand dollars ($35,000.00) or more for public
works and improvement contracts), must be in writing and
authorized by the city council.
1.1.08. PROFESSIONAL AND CONSULTANT CONTRACTS.
This section shall apply to professional and/or technical service
consultant contracts in which the city enters into an agreement
to purchase consultant services for city government from a
corporation, firm, agency, individual, or group of individuals
based on their recognized experience and knowledge within a
specialized area of expertise. Contracts for professional and
consultant services are not required to follow the procurement
requirements set forth in Section 1.1.04, but may be entered into
3
PROCUREMENT POLICY
NUMBER: 1.1
through direct negotiations. All such contracts ten thousand
dollars ($10,000.00) or more are subject to the authorization
requirements of Section 1.1.07.
1.1.09. SUPPLY CONTRACTS.
A. To determine the cost of a contract for the purpose of
establishing the appropriate procurement procedures under
this chapter, when the contract has no definite term or unit
amount, the amount of the estimated annual cost shall be
deemed the contract cost.
B. In lieu of requesting bids or quotations for each
procurement or maintaining bid lists, the city may solicit
bids or proposals for a contract for a specific term to
supply goods, materials, supplies, equipment or services on
an as needed basis in those instances where the specific
service or product in a product line or volume of units is
undetermined such as the city's needs and use of office
supplies.
1.1.10. WAIVER.
The procurement requirements set forth in Section 1.1.04 may be
waived by a written determination by the mayor that either the
materials, supplies, equipment or services are clearly and
legitimately limited to a single source of supply within the near
vicinity, or that the materials, supplies, equipment or services
are subject to special market conditions, involve special
facilities or services, or that a bid would otherwise not be
practicable or in the city's best interests under the
circumstances, in which instances the purchase price may be best
established by direct negotiation. The written determination
shall also recite why this situation exists.
4
PROCUREMENT POLICY
1.1.11. EMERGENCIES.
NUMBER: 1.1
When any emergency requires the immediate execution of any
contract to purchase, lease or rent as described in this chapter,
upon the finding of the existence of such an emergency, the
mayor shall have the power to make and enter into such contract
without strict compliance with the procurement requirements set
forth in this chapter. The designated department director shall
issue a written basis for the emergency determination accompanied
by a description and/or specification and cost estimate of the
contract at the time of or as soon as practicable after the
commencement of the purchase.
1.1.12. EXCEPTION FOR RECYCLED PRODUCTS.
Nothing in the chapter shall prohibit the city from
preferentially purchasing products made from recycled materials
or products that may be recycled or reused.
,hW,cy.d�
0
rp`
Kent City Council Meeting
Date October 4, 1994
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: SPEED LIMITS - ORDINANCE
2. SUMMARY ST ;fAs recommended by the Public Safet
�C-ommi ee /� option of Ordinance No. -3 esLa
ing a new
chap er, Chapter 9.40 of the Kent City Code, relating to the
establishment of speed limitsA The Kent City Code adopts by
reference a ode ra is rdinance set forth in Chapter 308-
330 WAC. The provisions of the Model Traffic Ordinance set
forth the procedure for cities to determine and declare the
maximum speed limits on City arterials, streets, and other
rights-of-way, and allows such to be done by resolution.
Adoption of the proposed ordinance would codify and provide
notice of the process for establishing speed limits.
3. EXHIBITS: Ordinance
4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Safety Committee
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
M
/A
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 3E
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the
City of Kent, Washington, adding a new
chapter, Chapter 9.40, to the Kent City Code
relating to vehicular speed limits on certain
designated streets.
WHEREAS, the Kent Traffic Code adopts by reference the
Model Traffic Ordinance, set forth in Washington Administrative
Code in Chapter 308-330 WAC (Ordinance 3170); and
WHEREAS, provisions of the Model Traffic Ordinance,
Washington Administrative Code 308-330-270, and RCW 46.61.415
set forth the procedure for the local authority to determine and
declare the maximum speed limits on city arterials, streets and
other rights of way, and allows such to be done by resolution
after an engineering and traffic investigation by the traffic
engineer; and
WHEREAS, a list of the speed limits on certain
designated streets in the City has been properly made and adopted
by Resolution No. 1299, and an amended list has been established
to be adopted by resolution; and
0ed limala
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to adopt an ordinance
relating to the establishment of vehicular speed limits on
streets in the City of Kent; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES
HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. There is hereby added to Title 9 of the
Kent City Code a new chapter, Chapter 9.40, entitled "Speed
Limits" to read as follows:
CHAPTER 9.40
SPEED LIMITS
Sec. 9.40.010. Findings.
The Kent Traffic Code adopts by reference the Model
Traffic Ordinance, set forth in Washington Administrative Code in
Chapter 308-330 WAC. The Model Traffic Ordinance, pursuant to
Washington Administrative Code Section 308-330-270, and RCW
46.61.415, set forth the procedure for a municipality such as the
City of Kent to determine and declare the maximum speed limits on
city arterials, streets and other rights-of-way, and allows such
to be done by resolution after an engineering and traffic
investigation by the traffic engineer. The city council finds
that it is necessary and appropriate to adopt an ordinance
relating to the establishment of vehicular speed limits on
E
certain designated streets in the City of Kent as authorized by
state law.
Sec. 9.40.020. State Speed Law Applicable.
The State traffic laws regulating the speed of
vehicles, RCW 46.61.400 through 46.61.475, shall be applicable
upon all streets within this City, except as this Chapter, as
authorized by state law, declares and determines upon the basis
of engineering and traffic investigation that certain speed
regulations shall be applicable upon specified streets or in
certain areas, in which event, it shall be unlawful for any
person to drive a vehicle at a speed in excess of any speed so
declared in this Chapter when signs are in place giving notice
thereof.
Sec. 9.40.030. Streets and speed limits.
Pursuant to RCW 46.61.400(2)(a), all city streets
within the city limits of the City of Kent shall have a speed
limit of 25 miles per hour to be in effect at all times except
those streets and/or part of streets which shall have speed
limits to be in effect at all times, as established by City
Council resolution, pursuant to the Model Traffic Ordinance set
forth in Section 9.36.010 of the Kent City Code, more
specifically, Washington Administrative Code Section 308-330-270
and RCW 46.61.415, which resolution shall be on file in the City
Clerk's office.
3
Sec. 9.40.040. Approval of State Highway Commission.
The City traffic engineer is directed to obtain from
the Washington State Department of Transportation any approval
which may be required by RCW 47.24.020, and to see that proper
signs are posted along any highway or portion thereof for which
such approval is required, notifying the public of the legal
speed limit thereon.
Sec. 9.40.050. Regulation of speed by traffic signals.
The traffic engineer is authorized to regulate the
timing of traffic signals so as to permit the movement of traffic
in an orderly and safe manner.
Sec. 9.40.060. Violations.
Violation of any of the speed limits established
pursuant to this chapter, and any city council resolution
established hereunder, shall be considered to be a traffic
infraction and shall be punishable by a monetary amount that may
be determined by statute, ordinance or court rule.
SECTION 2. Severability. If any section, sentence,
clause or phrase of this ordinance should be held to be invalid
or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such
invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity
or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or
phrase of this ordinance.
4
SECTION 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take
effect and be in force thirty (30) days from and after its
passage, approval and publication as provided by law.
JIM WHITE, MAYOR
ATTEST:
BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ROGER A. LUBOVICH, CITY ATTORNEY
A
PASSED day of
APPROVED day of
PUBLISHED day of
. 1994.
1994.
. 1994.
I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance
No. , passed by the City Council of the City of Kent,
Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the City of Kent as
hereon indicated.
(SEAL)
BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK
F7
Kent City Council Meeting
Date October 4, 1994
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: SPEED LIMITS - RESOL0UTION
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Adoption of Resolution No. / 06
relating to vehicular speed limits on certain designated
streets. The Kent Model Traffic Code adopts by reference the
Model Traffic Ordinance set forth in Chapter 308-330 WAC. The
provisions of the Model Traffic Ordinance set forth the
procedure for cities to determine and declare speed limits on
certain arterials, streets and other rights-of-way. An
ordinance being considered concurrently with this resolution
establishes a new chapter of the Kent City Code, Chapter 9.40,
providing that the City may establish speed limits on certain
streets by resolution. This resolution would amend the speed
limits previously established in Resolution No. 1299, which
would be repealed.
3. EXHIBITS: Resolution
4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Safety Committee
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
R
7.
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 3F
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the
City of Kent, Washington, relating to
vehicular speed limits on certain designated
streets, as posted by official traffic
control devices, pursuant to Chapter 9.40 of
the Kent City Code.
WHEREAS, the Kent Traffic Code, Section 9.36.010,
adopts by reference the Model Traffic Ordinance set forth in
Washington Administrative Code in Chapter 308-330 WAC (Ordinance
3170); and
WHEREAS, provisions of the Model Traffic Ordinance,
Washington Administrative Code Section 308-330-270 and RCW
46.61.415, set forth the procedure for the local authority to
determine and declare the speed limits on city arterials, streets
and other rights of way, after an engineering and traffic
investigation by the traffic engineer; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Model Traffic Ordinance,
Chapter 9.40 of the Kent City Code was adopted to provide that
the City may establish speed limits on certain designated streets
by resolution.
WHEREAS, a list of the speed limits on certain
designated streets in the City has been properly made and adopted
by Resolution 1299; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to update and amend
the list of speed limits set forth in Resolution 1299; NOW,
THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 2. Increasing or Decreasing Sneed Limits on
Certain Streets Hiahways or other Rights -of -Way. It is
determined, on the basis of an engineering and traffic
investigation, that the speed permitted by state law upon the
following streets or portion thereof is less than, or in some
cases, more than that necessary for safe operation of vehicles,
either because of (1) the designation and sign posting of these
streets as arterial highways; (2) the existence of widely spaced
intersections; or (3) the increased traffic on these streets as
disclosed by traffic studies. It is hereby declared that the
speed limits on such streets shall be as hereinafter set forth on
the streets or portions of same listed, at all times, unless
otherwise specified, after official traffic control devices have
been posted to give notice thereof; provided, that in no case
16
shall the speed limit on City streets exceed fifty-five (55)
miles per hour.
Name of street or
portions affected
Sneed limit
1. Pacific Highway South (SR 99)
from a point 530 feet south of
the intersection of South 252nd
Street to the intersection of
Kent -Des Moines Road
45 mph
2. 30th Avenue South from the inter-
section of South 240th Street to
the intersection of Kent -Des
Moines Road (SR 516)
35 mph
3. Military Road from the intersection
of S. 229th Street to the inter-
section of S. 250th Street
35 mph
4. Military Road from the intersection
of S. 250th Street to the inter-
section of S. 268th Street 40 mph
5. Reith Road from the intersection
of Kent -Des Moines Road to the
intersection of Military Road 35 mph
6. Lake Fenwick Road from the inter-
section of Reith Road to the
intersection of S. 264th Street 35 mph
7. Lake Fenwick Road southbound from
the intersection of S. 264th Street
to Section Line 27-22-4 35 mph
3
Name of street or
portions affected Speed limit
8. Frager Road from the intersection
of S. 204th Street to the inter-
section of Meeker Street 25 mph
9. Russell Road from the intersection
of Meeker Street to the inter-
section of S. 196th Street 25 mph
10. South 196th Street from the inter-
section of West Valley Highway
(68th Ave. S.) to a point 4215 feet
west (Russell Road) of the inter-
section of West Valley Highway 35 mph
11. West Valley Highway from the inter-
section of S. 180th Street to the
intersection of Morton Street
(S. 238th Street) 50 mph
12. West Valley Highway from the inter-
section of Morton Street (S. 238th
Street) to the intersection of
SR 516 35 mph
13. West Valley Highway from the inter-
section of SR 516 to a point 180
feet north of the intersection of
S. 262nd Street 40 mph
14. West Valley Highway from a point
180 feet north of S. 262nd Street
to the intersection of S. 272nd St. 50 mph
15. 84th Avenue S. from the intersection
of S. 180 Street to the intersection
of SR 167 40 mph
4
Name of street or
portions affected Speed limit
16. Central Avenue from the intersection
of SR 167 to the intersection of
James Street 35 mph
17. Central Avenue from the inter-
section of James Street to the
intersection of Willis Street 30 mph
18. Frontage Road from the intersection
of Willis Street to the inter-
section of S. 259th Street 35 mph
19. Frontage Road from the intersection
of S. 262nd Street to the inter-
section of S. 277th Street 35 mph
20. N. Fourth Avenue from the inter-
section of S. 228th Street to a
point 200 feet north of the inter-
section of Cloudy Street 35 mph
21. N. Fourth Avenue from a point 200
feet north of the intersection of
Cloudy Street to the intersection
of Willis Street 30 mph
22. 80th Place S. from 80th Avenue S.
to the intersection of 84th Avenue
S. (190th Street) 35 mph
23. 92nd Avenue S. from the intersection
of S. 208th Street to S. 200th St. 35 mph
24. 104th Avenue S.E. from a point 100
feet north of the intersection of
S.E. 236th Street to the inter-
section of S.E. 272nd Street 35 mph
5
Name of street or
iortions affected Speed limit
25. Kent -Des Moines Road (SR 516)
eastbound from a point 50 feet
west of 27th Avenue S. to the
intersection of 30th Avenue S. 35 mph
26. Meeker Street from a point 686
feet from west edge of Green River
Bridge to a point 500 feet west of
the intersection of West Valley
Highway (Washington Avenue) 40 mph
27. Meeker Street from a point 500
feet west of the intersection of
West Valley Highway (Washington
Avenue) to the intersection of
6th Avenue 30 mph
28. Meeker Street from the intersection
of 6th Avenue to the intersection
of State Avenue 25 mph
29. Smith Street (SR 516) from the
intersection of Lincoln Avenue
to the intersection of Hazel Ave. 30 mph
30. Canyon Drive (SR 516) from the
intersection of Hazel Avenue to
the intersection of 100th Ave. S.E. 40 mph
31. S.E. 256th Street from the inter-
section of 100th Avenue S.E. to
the intersection of 116th Ave. S.E. 35 mph
32. Kent-Kangley Road from the inter-
section of S.E. 256th Street to the
intersection of 116th Avenue S.E. 35 mph
Name of street or
portions affected
Speed limit
33. Gowe Street from a point 100 feet
west of the intersection of Sixth
Avenue N. to the intersection of
State Avenue 25 mph
34. Willis Street from the intersection
of N. Fourth Avenue to the inter-
section of S. Central Avenue 30 mph
35. 97th Place S. from the intersection
of Canyon Drive to the intersection
of Crow Street 30 mph
36. S.E. 264th Street from the inter-
section of 100th Place S.E. to the
intersection of 108th Avenue S.E. 35 mph
37. S. 228th Street from the inter-
section of Russell Road to the
intersection of West Valley Highway
(68th Avenue S.) 35 mph
38. S. 228th Street from the inter-
section of West Valley Highway
(68th Avenue S.) to the intersection
of 84th Avenue S. 40 mph
39. S. 212th Street west city limits
to the east city limits 40 mph
40. S. 208th Street from the inter-
section of 84th Avenue S. to the
intersection of S. 208th Street 35 mph
41. 114th Avenue S.E. from the inter-
section of Kent-Kangley Road to
655 feet south of S.E. 274th St. 35 mph
7
Name of street or
portions affected Speed limit
42.
116th Avenue S.E. from the inter-
section of S.E. 227th Street to
the intersection of Kent-Kangley
Road (SR 516)
35 mph
43.
S.E. 248th Street from the inter-
section of 94th Avenue S. to the
intersection of 116th Avenue S.E.
35 mph
44.
Reiten Road from Titus Street to
Maple Street
30 mph
45.
Maple Street from Reiten Road to
Tilden Avenue
30 mph
46.
Woodland Way S. from Tilden Avenue
to the intersection of S.E. 267th
Street
30 mph
47.
S.E. 267th Street from the inter-
section of Woodland Way to the
intersection of 104th Avenue S.E.
30 mph
48.
S.E. 272nd Street from the inter-
section of 104th Avenue S.E. to the
intersection of 108th Avenue S.E.
35 mph
49.
77th Avenue S. from the inter-
section of S. 212th Street to the
end of the road
35 mph
50.
James Street from the intersection
of Russell Road to the intersection
of 116th Avenue S.E.
35 mph
51.
76th Avenue S. from the inter-
section of S. 228th Street to the
intersection of S. 212th Street
35 mph
n
Name of street or
portions affected
Speed limit
52. S. 190th Street
from the inter-
section of West
Valley Highway
(68th Avenue S.)
to the inter-
section of S. 196th Street
35 mph
53. S. 194th Street
from the inter-
section of 66th
Avenue S. to the
intersection of
Russell Road
35 mph
54. 70th/72nd Avenue S. from the inter-
section of S. 228th Street to the
intersection of
S. 180th Street
35 mph
55. S. 216th Street from the inter-
section of 64th Avenue S. to the
intersection of 72nd Avenue S. 35 mph
56. S. 218th Street from the inter-
section of 88th Avenue S. to the
intersection of 98th Avenue S. 25 mph
57. S. 220th Street from the inter-
section of West Valley Highway
(68th Avenue S.) to the inter-
section of 72nd Avenue S. 35 mph
58. 80th Avenue S. from the south
right-of-way line of S. 180th
Street to the intersection of
S. 196th Street 35 mph
59. S.E. 264th Street from the inter-
section of Crow Road to the inter-
section of 108th Avenue S.E. 35 mph
60. S.E. 260th Street from the inter-
section of 97th Place S. to the
intersection of 108th Avenue S.E. 35 mph
9
Name of street or
portions affected Speed limit
61. 101st Avenue S.E. from the inter-
section of S.E. 256th Street to
the intersection of S.E. 260th St. 30 mph
62. Crow Road from the intersection of
S.E. 260th Street to the inter-
section of S.E. 264th Street 35 mph
63. S.E. 260th Street from the inter-
section of 97th Place S. to the
intersection of 108th Avenue S.E. 30 mph
64. S.E. 228th Street from the inter-
section of Central Avenue to the
end of the street 25 mph
65. 88th Avenue S. from the inter-
section of S. 228th Street to the
intersection of S. 218th Street 25 mph
66. 108th Avenue S.E. from the inter-
section of Kent-Kangley Road to
660 feet south of S.E. 274th Street 35 mph
Section 2. The City Traffic Engineer shall take
whatever steps are necessary to comply with all statutory
directives regarding approval of the state of these speed limits,
posting of official traffic control devices and the regulation of
timing of traffic signals, as set forth in the Model Traffic
ordinance, adopted by reference pursuant to Section 9.36.010 of
the Kent City Code, more specifically, Section 308-330-270 of the
Washington Administrative Code, RCW 46.61.415, and all other
applicable sections of the Model Traffic ordinance.
10
Section 3. Resolution 1299 is hereby repealed in its
entirety on the effective date of this resolution.
Section 4. This resolution shall become effective
November 5, 1994.
Passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Kent, Washington this day of , 1994.
Concurred in by the Mayor of the City of Kent, this
day of , 1994.
ATTEST:
BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
JIM WHITE, MAYOR
ROGER A. LUBOVICH, CITY ATTORNEY
11
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy
of Resolution No. , passed by the City Council of the
City of Kent, Washington, the day of , 1994.
speedlim.res
BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK
12
(SEAL)
Kent City Council Meeting
Date October 4, 1994
J
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: NO PARKING ZONES - ORDINANCE
2. SUMMARY STA As recommended by the Public Safet
uommitte__S�j /gaopwlon or urainance ivo. :) 1,5 i amenu.iny
Chapter -9.38 of the Kent City Code relating to no parking and
restricted parking zones The City's current parking ordinance
refers to lists on file in the City Clerk's office for specific
no parking or restricted parking zones. Due to the number of
lists that need to be maintained and the difficulty of pro-
viding adequate notice of these zones, this ordinance would
incorporate and amend the current list of no parking and
restricted parking zones into Chapter 9.38.
3. EXHIBITS: Ordinance
4.
E
R
7.
RECOMMENDED BY: Public Safety Committee
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
econds
Council Agenda
Item No. 3G
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the
City of Kent, Washington, amending Chapter
9.38 of the Kent City Code relating to no -
parking zones.
WHEREAS, the Kent Traffic Code adopts by reference the
Model Traffic Ordinance, set forth in Washington Administrative
Code in Chapter 308-330 WAC (Ordinance 3170); and
WHEREAS, the Model Traffic Ordinance, pursuant to RCW
46.61.570, authorizes a municipality such as the City of Kent, by
ordinance, to restrict parking and establish no -parking zones on
city streets and other rights of way; and
WHEREAS, an amended list of no -parking zones on certain
designated streets in the City has properly been made; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to adopt and codify
the amended list of no -parking zones; NOW, THEREFORE,
na /ia-xfFc��t�
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES
HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. Section 9.38 of the Kent City Code is
hereby amended to read as follows:
CHAPTER 9.38. PARKING
sec. 9.38.010. Findings.
T
The Kent Traffic Code adopts by reference the Model
Traffic Ordinance set forth in Washington Administrative Code
Chapter 308-330 WAC The Model Traffic Ordinance pursuant to
RCW 46 61 570 authorizes a municipality such as the City of
Kent by ordinance to restrict parking and establish no -parking
zones on city streets and other rights-of-way. The city council
finds that it is necessary and appropriate for public safety
L
t e _ e st,_-ret
ti -,e
use ef tl=xe—le
jeeatea
L
in the city
n4 t
i, .. ? Y
The Kent Traffic Code adopts by reference the Model
Traffic Ordinance set forth in Washington Administrative Code
Chapter 308-330 WAC The Model Traffic Ordinance pursuant to
RCW 46 61 570 authorizes a municipality such as the City of
Kent by ordinance to restrict parking and establish no -parking
zones on city streets and other rights-of-way. The city council
finds that it is necessary and appropriate for public safety
reasons to adopt an ordinance establishing restricted parking
and no -parking zones on city streets and other rights-of-way
within the City of Kent.
Sec. 9.38.020. No -parking zones.
At such time as the traffic engineer shall place the
appropriate sign or signs it shall be illegal to park any motor
or other vehicle at any time upon and on either side of, unless
otherwise indicated the following roadways or portions thereof:
1. East valley Highway (84th Avenue S. and
Central Avenue)• from the Green River to S. 180th Street.
2. Meeker Street: from Sixth Avenue S. to the
Kent -Des Moines Road.
Avenue.
228th Street.
3. Smith Street• from Lincoln Avenue to Jason
4. Fourth Avenue: from Willis Street to S.
5. Kent-Kanaley Road: from S.E. 256th Street to
the centerline of 116th Avenue S.E.
6. East Gowe Street: from a point two hundred
thirty feet east of the centerline of State Avenue to East Titus_
Street.
7. SR 99 (Pacific Highway South): from a point
one thousand six hundred thirty feet south of the intersection_ of
S 240th Street to the intersection of S 240th Street (Past side
only).
8. Pioneer Street• from one hundred seventy
feet west of the centerline of State Avenue to the centerline of
State Avenue (south side only).
9. East Titus Street:
a. From East Gowe Street to a point one
hundred twenty feet southwest to the centerline of Reiten Road
(southeast side only).
b. From apoint one hundred twenty feet
southwast of the centerline of Reiten Road to Smith Street.
10. 30th Avenue S.: from Kent -Des Moines Road to
S. 240th Street.
11. S. 240th Street: from 27th Avenue S. to
Pacific Highway S.
4th Avenue.
Street.
12, West Cloudy Street: from N. 5th Avenue to N.
13, Lincoln Avenue from Smith Street to Meeker
14. 101st Avenue S E • from the intersection of
S.E. 256th to the intersection of S. 260th Street.
15. Lincoln Avenue• from the intersection of
Meeker Street to the intersection of James Street.
16. Sam Street• from West Valley Highway
(Washington Avenue) to 500 feet East of West Valley Highway.
17. 5th Avenue: from the intersection of S.
228th Street to the intersection of S. 226thStreet._
18. Smith Street from Lincoln Avenue to Jason
Avenue.
19. 97th Place S from the intersection of Canyon
Drive to the intersection of Crow Road.
20. 77th Avenue:
a. from the intersection of S 212th Street
to the end of 77th Avenue S (east side only).
b. from the intersection of S. 212th Street
to a point 2700 feet north of that intersection (west side only).
21. S.E. 260th Street: from 97th Place S. to
108th Avenue S.E.
22. 76th Avenue S.: from S. 212th Street to S.
228th Street.
Street.
23. Russell Road: from James Street to Meeker
24. 70 72nd Avenue S.: from S. 228th Street to
43rd Avenue S (S 180th Street
25. Reith Road: from Military Road to SR 516
also known as Kent -Des Moines Rd.
26. S 190th Street from West Valley Hiahwa
(SR 181) to 62nd Avenue S.
27. S. 194th Street: from 66th Avenue S. to
Russell Road.
28. S 196th Street• from Puget Sound Power and
Light right-of-way to Russell Road.
190th Street.
190th Street.
190th Street.
29, 62nd Avenue S.: from S. 196th Street to S.
30. 64th Avenue S.: from S. 194th Street to S.
31. 66th Avenue S • from S 196th Street to S.
32. 80th Avenue S.: from S. 208th Street to S.
180th Street (43rd Avenue S.L.
Avenue S.
Place S.
Avenue S.
Avenue S.
Avenue S.
Avenue S.
80th Avenue S.
200th Street.
33. 80th Place S.: from 84th Avenue S. to 80th
34. S. 188th Street: from end of street to 80th
35. S 190th Street• from end of street to 80th
36. S 192nd Street• from end of street to 84th
37. S 194th Street• from end of street to 84th
38. S. 196th Street: from end of street to 84th
39. S 208th Street• from railroad tracks to
40. 80th Avenue S.: from S. 208th Street to S.
0
Avenue S.
196th Street.
Avenue S.
of street.
to SR 167.
street.
218th Street.
41. S. 200th Street: from 80th Avenue S. to 84th
42. 81st Avenue S.: from S. 200th Street to S.
43. S 200th Street• from 80th Avenue S. to 84th
44. S. 218th Street: from 84th Avenue S. to end
45. S. 222nd Street: from BNRR railroad tracks
46. S 228th Street• from Russell Road to end of
47. 88th Avenue S.: from S. 228th Street to S.
48. 109th Avenue S.E.: from S.E. 248th Street to
S E 256th Street.
64th Avenue S.
196th Street.
212th Street.
259th Street.
limits.
49. S 216th Street: from West Valley Highway to
50. Russell Road: from the Green River to S.
51. 64th Avenue: from the Green River to E-
52. 74th Avenue S • from Willis Street to E-
53. S 259th Street• from 74th Avenue to city
Ave. S.
54. James Street from Russell Road to 116th
55. S 216th Street: from West Valley Highway
(SR 181) to 72nd Avenue S.
56. S 220th Street: from West Valley Highway
(SR 181) to 72nd Avenue S.
57. 100th Avenue S -...from the end of the street
to James Street S. 240th Street - between 8:30 a.m. and 3:30
P.m.
58. 100th Avenue S - from the north city limits
to James Street (S 240th Street)
56. Maple Street - from Woodland Way to Garfield
Avenue south side.
60. East Valley Highway/Central Avenue from the
intersection of 180 Avenue S to the Green River Bridge.
61. 76th Avenue S from the intersection of S.
212th Street to the intersection of S. 228th Street.
62. 104th Avenue S E from a point 100 feet north
of S.E. 236th Street to the intersection of S.E. 264th Street.
63. Fourth Avenue S from the intersection of
Willis Street to the intersection of S. 228th Street.
64. 76th Avenue S from the intersection of S.
228th Street to the intersection of S 212th Street.
65. military Road from the intersection of S.
229th Street to the intersection of S. 268th Street.
66. Canyon Drive from the intersection of Hazel
Avenue to the intersection of 101st Avenue S.E.
67. S.E. 256th Street from the intersection of
101st Avenue S.E. to the intersection of 116th Ave. S.E.
68. James Street from the intersection of Russell
Road to the intersection of 116th Avenue S.E.
69. 54th Avenue S. from the intersection of S.
226th Street to the intersection of S. 228th Street.
70. S. 226th Street from the intersection of 54th
Avenue S. to the intersection of 64th Avenue S.
71. S 212th Street from the west city limits to
the east city limits.
72. S. 208th Street from the intersection of 84th
Avenue S. to the intersection of 96th Avenue S.
73. S. 204th Street from the intersection of West
Valley Highway to the intersection of 72nd Avenue S.
74. Lakeside Blvd West from the intersection of
Russell Road to the intersecting of Lakeside Blvd. East.
75, Lakeside Blvd East from the intersection of
Russell Road to the intersecting of Lakeside Blvd. East.
76. S 236th Street from the intersection of
Lakeside Blvd East to the intersection of 64th Avenue S.
77, Landing Way from the intersection of 64th
Avenue S to the intersection of West Valley Highway.
78, S 234th Street from the intersection of West
Valley Highway to the end of the street.
79. Sixth Avenue S from the intersection of S.
228th Street to the end of the street.
80. Second Avenue S. from the intersection of S.
228th Street to the end of the street
81. S 216th Street from the intersection of 84th
Avenue S to the end of the street.
82. 94th Avenue S from the intersection of S.
248th Street to the intersection of Canyon Drive.
83. South Central Place from the intersection of
S 266th Street to the end of the street.
84. S. 259th Street from the intersection of
Central Avenue to the intersection of 89th Avenue S.
85. Willis Street from the intersection of Fourth
Avenue S. to the intersection of Central Avenue.
Sec. 9.38.0304-2-5. Parking in fire lanes; penalty.
A. Parking prohibited. Except when necessary to
temporarily avoid conflict with other moving traffic or in
compliance with the direction of a police officer, fire official,
traffic control sign, signal or device, no person shall:
1. Stop, stand or park a vehicle, whether
occupied or not within any fire lane except:
a. Momentarily to pick up or discharge a
passenger or passengers; or
b. Temporarily for the purpose of and while
actually engaged in loading or unloading property.
10
2. Allow continued violations of this section on
private property which they own or manage.
B. Penalty -es. Any violation of the provisions of
this section shall be a traffic infraction punishable by a
monetary penalty of net =aeac e t twenty-five dollars ($25.00).
Sec. 9.38.040838. Arterial and highway parking prohibited.
Parking is prohibited on four -lane highways or
arterials unless otherwise designated by sign or posting.
Sec. 9.38.050849. Parking prohibited from 4:00 a.m. to 7:00 a.m.
At such time as the traffic engineer shall place the
appropriate sign, it shall be illegal to park any motor or other
vehicle between the hours of 4:00 a.m. and 7:00 a.m., except
Sundays and holidays, a` on either side of, unless otherwise
indicated, the following locations_ erg the selieelule—en mile in
the eitu clerk's effiee.
Avenue:
Avenue:
Street:
A. Meeker Street: from Fourth Avenue to State
B. Gowe Street: from Meeker Street to State Avenue;
C. Titus Street: from Fourth Avenue to Central
D. First Avenue: from Smith Street to Titus Street;
B__- Second Avenue: from Harrison Street to Saar
11
Street:
F. Railroad Avenue: from James Street to Titus
G. State Avenue: from Smith Street to Gowe Street.
Sec. 9.38.06045$. Two-hour parking zones.
A. The city council finds that it is necessary to
have a system of special parking permits to be administered by
the traffic engineer which authorizes council members and the
mayor to utilize existing two-hour parking zones and fifteen -
minute parking zones at or near the city hall and other city
facilities during regular business hours between 9:00 a.m. until
6:00 p.m. necessary for the attendance of such officials at
meetings and official business with the city.
B. Except for section 9.38.07006$ and permits issued
by the traffic engineer under section 9.38.170.1-x, at such times
as the director of public works or designee shall place the
appropriate sign, it shall be illegal to park any motor or other
vehicle for an uninterrupted period in excess of two (2) hours
between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on either side of,
unless otherwise indicated, the following streets or portions
thereof: listed in theh a, file the eity—,e2l-e�
Avenue).
1. Harrison Street (Fourth Avenue - Second
2.
Meeker
Street
(Fourth
Avenue
- State
Avenue).
3.
Gowe Street
(Fourth
Avenue -
Central
Avenue)
12
4. Titus Street (Second Avenue - First Avenue).
5. First Avenue (from a point two hundred feet
north of Meeker Street - Titus Street).
6. Second Avenue (Smith Street - Titus Street).
7. Railroad Avenue (Smith Street - Meeker
Street, east side only).
8. State Avenue (Smith Street - Meeker Street).
Provided that this section shall not apply on Sundays
or holidays.
Sec. 9.38.07046-4. Holiday parking; penalty.
From the day after Thanksgiving until January second of
the following year, all two-hour parking zones shall be
considered three-hour parking zones, and it shall be illegal to
park any motor or other vehicle for an uninterrupted period in
excess of three (3) hours between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 6:00
p.m. on the roadways designated in section 9.38.06046-8 as two-
hour parking zones. There shall be no enforcement of limited
duration parking restrictions, in those zones designated for two-
hour parking, on Saturdays during the period from the day after
Thanksgiving until January second of the following year. A
violation of this section shall be an infraction and punishable
by a monetary penalty of net fne=ern twenty dollars ($20.00).
13
Sec. 9.38.080. Thirty -minute parking zones.
At such times as the traffic engineer shall place the
appropriate sign, it shall be illegal to park any motor or other
vehicle for an uninterrupted period in excess of thirty (30)
minutes at on either side of unless otherwise indicated, the
las_ f;,
following locations_ �adl-e—�-�--e� �=e�rn
_ - -1 l -k s aF€zee .
A. First Avenue: The first stall north of Meeker
Street on the west side of First Avenue.
B. First Avenue: The first stall south of Meeker
Street on the west side of First Avenue.
C. Second Avenue: The first stall south of Meeker
Street on the east side of Second Avenue.
D. Second Avenue: The first stall south of Meeker
Street on the west side of Second Avenue.
E. Gowe Street: The first stall east of Railroad
Avenue on Gowe Street, north side.
F. Fourth Avenue: The first stall north of Titus
Street on the east side of Fourth Avenue.
14
See. 9.38 0. Fifteen
mintit parking zones.
thie traffie
engineer
seetien 9.38.188, at
sueh ti-me as
it 19e illegal
t=e
pleee the
sign, sliall
park any fneter
.r
f fifteen.
eiether ve-hiefie—€ems
an n =.fir- -=pt- =
!.sted in
= ee =" emeess -e
file in
,dle
(IS) minutes en these
streets tiie
ehe( en
Sec. 9.38.090a46. Parking reserved for physically disabled -Ly
penalty.
A. It is a traffic infraction for any person to park
a vehicle in a parking place reserved for physically disabled
persons pursuant to RCW ch. 70.92 or authority implemental
thereof, without a special license plate, card or decal as
provided in RCW 46.16.381, as amended. This provision shall be
enforceable on private property open to the general public as
well as on streets and government owned property. A person
charged with a violation shall not be determined to have
committed an infraction if he produces in court or prior to the
court appearance a special license plate, special card or special
decal required by RCW 46.16.381 or demonstrates that he was
entitled to the same at the time of being ticketed.
B. Physically disabled parking is reserved on public
streets in the City at the following locations:
1. Harrison Street at the crosswalk between
Fourth Avenue and Second Avenue.
15
2. Second Avenue South between Gowe Street and
Titus Street on the west side of Second Avenue.
3. Titus Street between First Avenue and Second
Avenue South on the n rth side of First Avenue.
�C. Any violation of this section shall be an
infraction and punishable by a monetary penalty of fifty __T
than tw dollars ($50.00) "-o`°', Vehicles in violation
are subject to impoundment as provided by law.
Sec. 9.38.10031$. compliance with state law.
The traffic engineer is directed to obtain from the
state highway commission approval and ratification of any no -
parking zone where required by RCW 47.24.020.
Sec. 9.38.110-144. Parking prohibited within ten feet of
mailboxes; penalty.
A. No motor vehicle shall be parked within ten (10)
feet of a clearly visible, residential mailbox which is located
directly adjacent to curbside or on a public right-of-way between
the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. except Sundays and holidays.
B. Any violation of this section shall be an
infraction and punishable by a monetary penalty of net fftere t
twenty-five dollars ($25.00). Vehicles in violation are subject
to impoundment as provided by law.
16
Sec. 9.38.1203-39. Parking of trucks on city streets.
The city council finds that the parking and storage of
commercial trucks, vans, tractor trailers, and semi -trailers with
a maximum gross vehicle weight exceeding eight thousand (8,000)
pounds presents unacceptable risks and hazards to public health,
safety and welfare when such vehicles are parked or stored on
city streets at times when such vehicles are not engaged in
business or commercial activity.
Sec. 9.38.130119. Parking and storage of certain vehicles;
penalty.
A. No commercial truck, vehicle, van, trailer or
semi -trailer, whether licensed or unlicensed, exceeding eight
thousand (8,000) pounds as defined in RCW 46.44.036, 46.44.037 or
46.44.041 may be stored or parked upon any city street for longer
than two (2) hours, except for those periods of time when such
vehicle is being loaded or unloaded or where parking or storage
is otherwise prohibited.
B. Any violation of this section shall be an
infraction and punishable by a monetary penalty of net mere `��
twenty-five dollars ($25.00). Vehicles in violation are subject
to impoundment as provided by law.
17
Sec. 9.38.1404rS-G. Parking of certain trailers or semi -trailers;
penalty.
A. Except as provided in section 9.38.1301-44, no
trailer or semi -trailer shall be parked upon any city street
unless the trailer or semi -trailer is attached to a vehicle by
which it may be propelled or drawn. In case of accident such
trailer or semi -trailer may be moved to the side of the street,
and if a good and sufficient red signal be displayed at both ends
of the trailer or semi -trailer during the hours of darkness, such
trailer or semi -trailer may be permitted or allowed to remain for
a period not exceeding twenty-four (24) hours pending removal
except that such trailer or semi -trailer shall not remain upon
any portion of a city street where standing or parking is limited-
or
imited-or prohibited for a period longer than is necessary to effect its
removal.
B. Any violation of this section shall be an
infraction and punishable by a monetary penalty of e `� _
twenty-five dollars ($25.00). Vehicles in violation are subject
to impoundment as provided by law.
Sec. 9.38.1501.64. Parking an unlicensed vehicle; penalty.
A. No person shall stop, stand or park a vehicle, on
a street, highway, alley or public property unless the vehicle
possesses a proper and current vehicle license plate. Such
license plate shall be properly mounted on the vehicle in
accordance with the state department of licenses rules and regulati
.M
B. Any violation of this section shall be an
infraction and punishable by a monetary penalty of net Fnere t�,n
twenty-five dollars ($25.00). Vehicles in violation are subject
to impoundment as provided by law.
Sec. 9.38.16037-G. Municipal parking facilities regulated;
penalty.
A. Parking shall be permitted at municipal parking
facilities only in designated parking areas, in the manner
provided by law, and as limited in time or otherwise restricted
by official signs, including parking permits issued by the
traffic engineer pursuant to section 9.38.170180.
B. Municipal parking facilities for the purposes of
this section mean any public parking area serving a municipal
facility. Such facilities include, but are not limited to, the
city commons, city golf facility, city senior center, all parks
or recreation facilities owned or operated by the city, city
shops, city hall, the corrections facility and those public lots
between Smith and Harrison Streets and Second Avenue and Fourth
Avenue, Gowe and Titus Streets and Second Avenue and Third
Avenue, and the Southeast corner of Second Avenue and Titus
Street.
C. Any violation of this section shall be an
infraction and punishable by a monetary penalty of
twenty-five dollars ($25.00). Vehicles in violation are subject
to impoundment as provided by law.
EL'S
Sec. 9.38.1703$4. Parking permits.
A. The city traffic engineer is authorized to issue
parking permits for city council members and the mayor on forms,
cards or stickers as the traffic engineer determines to be
appropriate and conspicuous. Such permits shall contain a
rendition of the city's corporate seal or official logo
identifying the holder thereof as an authorized user and member
of the city council or the mayor and to be exempt from parking
restrictions under this chapter, excluding disabled parking
stalls. Such permits authorize unlimited parking for official
business at two-hour parking zones provided under section
9.38.060854 for Meeker Street and Gowe Street, `—�-�
F
Street
metre and for all municipal parking facilities identified under
section 9.38.16o�&. Any permits issued by the traffic engineer
under this section shall be signed by the traffic engineer and
issued for such periods as deemed appropriate by the traffic
engineer.
B. The city traffic engineer is authorized to issue
parking permits for city corrections facility employees, Aukeen
District Court employees, King County probation office employees
and prosecutors whose municipalities use Aukeen District Court on
forms, cards or stickers as the traffic engineer determines to be
appropriate and conspicuous. Marked police vehicles and other
police vehicles displaying exempt license plates may use the
►II7
parking lot without being issued a permit. Such permits authorize
unlimited parking for city or district court business at the lot
southeast of the corrections facility at 1230 South Central
Street. The parking lot shall be for the exclusive use of
individuals with these parking permits except for any legally
designated handicapped parking. The permits shall be signed by
the traffic engineer and issued for such periods as deemed
appropriate by the traffic engineer.
Sec. 9.38.180113-6. Penalty for violation of certain sections.
Any violation of any section of this chapter for which
no penalty is specifically provided seeie 9.38-G2
n
shall be an infraction
.
and punishable by a monetary penalty of net mere than twenty
dollars ($20.00).
SECTION 2. Severability. If any section, sentence,
clause or phrase of this ordinance should be held to be invalid
or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such
invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity
or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or
phrase of this ordinance.
21
SECTION 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take
effect and be in force thirty (30) days from and after its
passage, approval and publication as provided by law.
JIM WHITE, MAYOR
ATTEST:
BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ROGER A. LUBOVICH, CITY ATTORNEY
PASSED
APPROVED
day of
day of
PUBLISHED day of
22
. 1994.
1994.
1994.
I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance
No. , passed by the City Council of the City of Kent,
Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the City of Kent as
hereon indicated.
parking.ord
BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK
23
(SEAL)
1. SUBJECT: OPTICOM SYSTEM
Kent City Council Meeting
Date October 4, 1994
Category Consent Calendar
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: The City presently has an Opticom system
incorporated into its traffic signal system which preempts the
traffic signal giving emergency response vehicles priority.
Approximately 40% of the existing traffic signals are presently
fitted with the older technology Opticom units with some
totally obsolete in terms of finding replacement parts thus
creating a traffic safety issue.
The 3-M Company is offering a special trade-in deal which is
good until the end of this year, and will save the City $75,000
if we act now versus waiting for the 1995 budget. The total
cost to upgrade our system is about $170,000. To finance this
there is $177,000 of left over street money in the West Valley
Highway Project Improvement fund. (LID 328 - $143,630 and
LID 327 - $33,049)
Because of the safety issue and the potential $75,000 saving,
it is the recommendation of the Public Works Committee that
this project be implemented and that we establish the fund
therefore as noted above.
3. EXHIBITS: Public Works minutes and Public Works Director
memorandum(s)
4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 3H
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
September 26, 1994
TO: Public Works Committee
FROM: Don Wickstrom b
RE: Opticom System
The City has an Opticom system incorporated into its traffic signal system. The Opticom
system preempts the traffic signal giving emergency response vehicles priority (green
light). It works off of a strobe light system with receivers on the traffic signal and
transmitters on the emergency response vehicles. The City has about 63 traffic signals.
The problem is that approximately 40% thereof are fitted with the older technology Opticom
units with some of them totally obsolete in terms of finding replacement parts. Additionally,
the new technology in strobe lights results in the preemption being triggered by all sorts
of vehicles thusly creating a traffic safety issue.
What brings this matter up now (mid -year) is that the 3M Company is offering a special
trade-in deal that is only good until the end of the year. This deal would save us $75,000
if we act now versus waiting via the '95 budget. The total cost to upgrade our system is
about $170,000 ($120,000 for the Opticom plus $50,000 for conduit and wiring problems
at specific intersections). To finance this there is $177,000 of left over street money in the
West Valley Highway Project Improvement fund [LID #328 - WVH Improvement (212th -
189th), $143,630 and LID #327 - WVH Improvement (Meeker - 212th Street), $33,049].
Because of the safety issue and the potential $75,000 saving, we recommend proceeding
ahead with the project and fund same from the West Valley Highway Improvement (LID
#328 - $143,630 and LID #327 - $26,307).
ACTION: Recommend implementing the project and establishing the fund therefore as
noted above.
CPSYSTEM
1\I `a�Cl :�Ittl �CCUI'il�
+\I l Cali i
`�.Irmc I)icision si {'.nil. \IX
10
August 2,1994
3MMr. Don Wickstrom, Director
Kent Public Works
220 S. 4th Street
Kent, Washington
Dear Don,
I want to thank you for seeing me yesterday. I have attached a proposal for the
trade-in of the older Opticom equipment as we discussed.
The attached letter dated November 11, 1993 to John Bond of your department
does go through most of the justifications. The main reason for the proposal is to
replace equipment which has become a maintenance problem because of age
and changing technology. As I stated yesterday, the model #168 phase selectors
are between 15 and 22 years old. The newer lightbars and warning strobes on
the market today will activate these older units. There are also some
components which cannot be replaced because they are no longer produced.
Many of the model #262 phase selectors are 12 to 15 years old. The 500 Series
Opticom, which would be supplied at 50% trade-in for the older units, has the
capability of managing the problems for the future.
The signal technicians have been experiencing false calls on the oldest units
because of improved technology with other strobe devices. There have also
been some units which they have had problems getting repaired. Many of the
problems did not exist five years ago. The changes in technology have come so
fast the past three or four years it would have been difficult to predict the effects
these changes would have on all traffic equipment. The main computer system
in your city is going through the same type of evolution.
The trade-in program is being offered through the end of 1994. The 50% trade-in
amounts to approximately $ 75,000.00 savings over the normal purchase price.
The installment purchase contract will allow the city to take advantage of these
savings and spread the cost over a five year period.
The new Opticom 500 Series equipment will extend all of the benefits of the
present system, reduce maintenance, offer additional security, more control
over who uses the system, and a record of every vehicle that uses the signal.
I want to thank you for your continued support of the Opticom System. I w,
appreciate your consideration of the attached proposal. I will contact youn two
weeks when I get back in town
further discuss this proposal.
Sincerely,
Steve Amend,
Account Executive
cc. Norm Angelo, Fire Chief
I would like to meet with you at that time to
KENT.XLS
(CITY OF KENT WASHINGTON OPTICOM PROPOSAL
I
3M IS OFFERING 50% OFF NEW OPTICOM 500 SERIES COMPONENTS WITH
THE TRADE-IN OF OLDER SERIES OPTICOM COMPONENETS.
I
THE CITY OF KENT HAS:
I
TRADE
I TOTAL
COST
I COST
351 EA I MODEL #168 PHASE SELECTORS $797.50
I $27,912.50
I
I
54 EA MODEL #262 PHASE SELECTORS I $797.50 I
I $43,065.00
I I
I
371 EA (VARIOUS VEHICLE UNITS $750.00 1
1 $27,750.00
1 1 T_I
24 EA I RACK ASSY'S WlHARNESS $175.00
S4,200.00
I
I
101EA I MODEL #262 PHASE SELECT - 1993 NO CHG
( $0.00
I I I I
i
I (TRADE-IN PROPOSAL I
1$102,927.50
ISALES TAX @ 8.3% 1
1 58,542.98
DOTAL PROPOSAL COST
$111,470.48
I � I
i 13M INSTALLMENT PURCHASE OPTION
I I I I
I
ONE YEAR ANNUAL PAYMENT 17% APR 1
.$119,273.42
1 I
I
TWO YEARS ANNUAL PAYMENT 17% APR I
1 S61,653.21
I I I I
I
THREE YEARS ANNUAL PAYMENT 6.5% APR
$42,089.02
I I I
1
FOUR YEARS ANNUAL PAYMENT 16.5% APR I
I $32,538.23
I I
�
FIVE YEARS ANNUAL PAYMENT 16.25% APR 1
I S26,642.56
A $75.00 ORIGINATION/ DOCUMENTATION FEE TO NE SUBMITTED WITH CONTRACT
APPLICATION. CHECK PAYABLE TO EM FINANCING SERVICES.1
THE FIRST PAYMENT IS DUE ONE YEAR FROM THEIR DATE OF DELIVERY, THE
SECOND, TWO YEARS FROM DATE OF DELIVERY, ETC. I
I
Page 1
\I Satr( and Fcrurin
:\1 l'cuui
S�+(rm• 11i�i.iun >i. Paul. NK jjIJJ-Illik�
ul' -33 1111,
November 11, 1993
John Bond, Traffic
City of Kent
220 - 4th Street
Kent, Washington 98032
Dear John,
In response to your request, I will explain the main reasons for our offer to
replace the Opticom System with new equipment in your city.
The first reason for the offer is the age of much of the equipment. Many of the
phase selectors, model 168's, are at least 18 years to 20 years old. The
technology has advanced beyond this unit and it is very susceptible to false
activation. The, number of vehicles using strobes has increased tremendously
over the past few years. Most maintenance vehicles, telephone co., cable TV
vehicles, and emergency vehicles use advanced strobe systems as their main
warning devices. This combined with the older technology in the 168,s makes it
necessary to replace these old units. Many of these older units have
components that are no longer available making them unrepairable.
The fir e department also has some of the old oil filled units which can no longer
be repaired. The newer Opticom vehicle units draw less current which makes
them more desirable because of the increase in electronics being used on these
vehicles.
The next area of concern is the security of the system because of the availability
of the old technology to the general public. The new Opticom System has
additional security built in which would make it very difficult in the future to
duplicate the vehicle ID codes that will be required. Each vehicle will have its
own ID, up to 20,000 different codes available. The traffic department would also
have more control over the system with the new options available.
The other area which is being discussed is the use of the system for transit
vehicles. Metro Transit has a project under design to have a Priority Control
System throughout the King County area. The need to increase the capacity of
our existing roadways and move more people rather than cars is being heavily
looked at by the Federal Highway Administration as well as most traffic
engineers. There is a tremendous amount of funding for the Transit agencies to
put a priority control system on the traffic signal. The new Opticom System will
give you the control over this type of system, ONE SYSTEM - ONE
INVESTMENT!
3M has developed the Opticom System to include an automatic Vehicle
Identification System and a dual priority system.
The Opticom System will now be able to handle both the public safety vehicles
as well as the public service vehicles with the same system. The vehicle ID will
allow the Traffic engineer to know which vehicle took control, what priority was
used, the date and time of the event, as well as enhanced troubleshooting from
the master computer system when the communication link is completed to each
intersection. The system security will be improved tremendously with the vehicle
identification system.
This new system will cost the same as the older equipment even with the added
technology benefits.
3M is making an offer to exchange the equipment purchased in 1993 for the new
components at no cost. The other equipment, even the 20 year old components,
will be exchanged for the enhanced system at 50% discount. The new Opticom
500 System will give you a system that will be much more flexible, more secure,
reduce the maintenance, and will fit very well into the future transportation needs
of the area and your proposed traffic control system.
Please let me know if you would like any additional information. I would like to
make a formal quotation to complete the change out in the near future.
I want to thank you for your support of the Opticom Priority Control System over
the past 22 years. I look forward to working with you for many more.
Sincerely,
Steve Amend
Account Executive
cc, Edie Smith, Advanced Traffic Products
3. 4 Ave. S. and S. 228 ST.
ace 60'sthe
This signal was built in the lcused.�The conduit was it was
conduit was installed only 2" conduit was
ower company vaults, we have loop splices in this
installed inside p
eral
ed hea
because we cannot f
cannotpull new cable dpush
the e intheexistingswork
conduit.
Install 4 inch conduit across S. 228 St.
type III junction boxes
signal cable and loop cable in existing and new conduit
controller cabinet
cosi: $15,000.00
4. Jason Ave. and Smith St.
T -his signal was built about 1975. The conduit installed was adequate for
the wiring needed to run the signal. We have modified this signal and
of the existing conduit. We have found out
that required the maximum use
that s,e need to run new opticom wiring from the eb head to the
controller, this cannot be done because the conduit is broken or
smashed crossing both Jason Ave. and Smith St.
Install 4 inch conduit across Smith St. and across Jason Ave.
signal cable
repair opticom detector heads
cost: $20,000.00
5. Central Ave. and Willis St.
of previous road construction
This signal was built about 1976. Because
the conduit crossing Central Avenue was broken or smashed. Because of
t install new cable or repair the opticom.
the damaged conduit we canno
Install 4 inch conduit across Central Ave.
11 signal cable
cost: $15,000.00
MEMORANDUM
JULY 25, 1994
TO: DON WICKSTROM, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
FROM: NORM ANGELO, FIRE CHIEF
SUBJECT: OPTICOM SYSTEM AND BUDGET
I am writing in follow up to the inquiry about opticom systems
and budget. If I could, let me give a summary of my
understanding of the history of this issue. It is my
understanding that after the initial system installation the cost
for additional systems was incorporated in LID's, Public Works
Projects (State, County and local) or as mitigation for signals
required by new projects. It has always been my understanding
that the maintenance and monitoring of these signal systems has
been done within the Public Works Department and we were
responsible to maintain the opticom units on our apparatus.
A couple of years ago, as budgets got tight, priorities in all of
our departments had to be juggled. It is my understanding for a
significant period of time preventative maintenance such as
routine cleaning of the lenses of the opticom systems was a lower
priority. Over the last couple of years we have experienced more
frequent difficulties in capturing the system on emergency
responses. Last year we were told of the possibility of a grant
or public works related transportation finds that might be
available to upgrade the system and associated replacement of the
sending units on our apparatus. At that time we emphasized the
critical need for ongoing maintenance of these systems.
Opticoms are imperative to our operation. They increase safety,
reduce risk/liability and play a major role in helping us
minimize our emergency response time. As we have encountered
increases in demand for service with reduced resources, the need
for a dependable opticom system has become even more important.
Naturally, last year we committed to supporting the grant and the
important funding proposals.
1
We appreciate the efforts of your staff and most certainly
understand the pressure we all had to make regarding short term
adjustments to get through the past years. Until late last month
I was still under the impression that we were pursing the public
works funding/grant. Through no ones fault, I understand that it
did not materialize.
My major shock came when I had heard rumors that parts of the
opticom system were not receiving necessary preventative
maintenance and that some of the systems may have been turned off
due to their age and cost of maintenance.
I, like you, learned a long time ago to get more information
after I hear second and third hand information. Therefore a
couple of weeks ago I asked Acting Assistant Chief Robertson to
contact your department for clarification. I believe he talked
to the supervisor of the unit responsible for such traffic
systems. Chief Robertson reported to me that it was explained to
him that Public Works was doing very limited preventative
maintenance and the older parts of the system which malfunctioned
were being turned off. Further, that previous hoped for public
works funding did not pan out, but there was a hope that between
the Fire Department, Public Works and the Police Department it
might be financed through a joint CIP proposal or other funding.
This brought two concerns. First of all the CIP for 1995 has
already been set and with a hold the line budget I did not
understand how such funding could be achieved. Secondly, I had
heard that the Police Chief felt as I did that there were some
concerns about lighter police sedans may be in competition with
heavier fire apparatus creating a new potential risk and impact
on response times. While I am open to being part of a discussion
of broader uses of the system, I felt in the dark as to the issue
of current funding and level of the system's maintenance. We had
requested a couple of times that week, a list of the opticoms
that were out of service. The list did not arrive. After a
meeting in your department I ran into Ed White, he suggested we
needed to get together on some issues. I agreed and I expressed
the funding and maintenance concerns I had with the opticom
issue. He mentioned that previous information I was given was
not completely accurate. Ed said that they have put no opticom
systems out of service to date, but they did have a concern about
the cost of maintenance of older portions of the system. Ed
N
suggested that I write a letter to yourself expressing areas of
interest, concern and support. This week we did get a list of
intersections with older equipment that may have difficulties due
to newer strobes.
Issue Opportunities: As I understand it an upgrade of the system
would allow for future lower priority use by transit vehicles to
expedite traffic. One of the cities top priorities is improving
transportation and transit capabilities. If the police Chief is
interested in use of the system it would be beneficial for the
three of us to get together and define the desired direction.
Don, I would be willing to support a program that would improve
the dependability and cost effective maintenance of the systems.
At this point I do not have funds operational or capital
available to me in the 1995 capital or operational budgets. I
would support strongly any special grant or alternate funding
programs that you may be aware of but we cannot compromise other
funded programs/projects. If that is not practical, we could
jointly prepare for a proposal in next years (1996) budget
process.
Don, in the meantime it is basic and essential to our timely and
safe emergency response that cleaning, preventative maintenance
and repairs be done to guarantee the integrity of the existing
system until it can be upgraded. I would be interested in
learning more about the state of the maintenance system for these
devices and what can be done to insure their reliability. Should
it not be possible to repair a given unit I would request that we
be kept immediately informed and that emergency funding to
maintain the system functionality be sought. Most certainly we
want to work with and support your department in finding upgrade
and maintenance solutions.
I
lm
3
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
Transportation Section
August 13, 1994
TO: Don Wickstrom, Director of Public Works
THROUGH: Ed White, Transportation Manager
FROM: John Rostad, Traffic Operations Engineer
SUBJECT: REPL-kCEMEIV" I' OF OLDER OPTIC OM EQUIPMENT
Here is some additional information regarding Opticom equipment. I hope it will answer your
questions regarding the trade-in deal 3M is offering the City.
This offer appears to me to be a very good deal. Most manufacturers will only offer to accept older
model equipment in trade when there is some design or manufacturing problem that causes such
equipment to work incorrectly. Our older equipment is working correctly as far as its' original design
was intended. We are experiencing problems with signals "getting stuck" due to the use of newer,
more efficient strobe lights on Police and Fire units. They trick the older Opticom equipment and
cause the signals so equipped to be preempted even when there is no real preemption demand. This
condition continues as long as the auxilliary strobes are left on. These units also produce a correct
response for a real Opticom demand. It is generous of 3M to offer us such a liberal trade-in amount
for our equipment that has, in effect, become obsolete due to improving technology. In addition, we
have the opportunity to receive the latest technological advances and features at locations where our
newer units are performing just fine and are not subject to false preemption like the others. I believe
another company would probably sit back and wait for us to modernize at full cost.
1
At this time the 3M system is the only one available that meets our needs. Optical preempt
equipment from other companies are not interchangeable.
J
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
Transportation Section
July 18, 1994
TO: Ed Crawford, Police Chief
FROM: John Rostad, Traffic Operations Engineer 19
SUBJECT: POSSIBLE OPTICOM PROBLEMS
In recent years, changes in technology have resulted in major visibility improvements in the
auxiliary strobe lights used on emergency vehicles. The main difference is the increased flash rate of
these units. The "downside" to this is the effect they are having on our older Opticom traffic signal
preemption equipment. These auxiliary strobes are being recognized as valid signal preemption
demand and cause the signals to be preempted on and off in an erratic manner. This could lead to
dangerous conditions at signalized intersections that are using this older Opticom equipment.
Following is a list of City intersections that are presently using the old equipment and could be
negatively influenced by the newer strobes in use today.
JASON & SMITH
CENTRAL & WILLIS
CENTRAL & SMITH
CENTRAL & MEEKER
WASHINGTON & JAMES 68TH S & S 228TH
CENTRAL & JAMES
WASHINGTON & MEEKER
104TH SE & SE 240TH
SR167 SB & SR516 FOURTH & SMITH FOURTH & WILLIS
FOURTH & GOWE FOURTH & MEEKER 84TH S & S 208TH
84TH S & S 212TH 84TH S & SR167 SB 84TH S & SR167 NB.
84TH S & S 228TH 84TH S & S 212TH STATE & SMITH
JASON & REITEN 94TH S & S 240TH 101ST SE & SE 256TH
111TH SE & KENT-KANGLEY
I hope this information will be of some help to you. If you would like to discuss this matter, feel
free to call me at Ext. 4017.
cc: Don Wickstrom
Ed White
improvements along 108th were made. Radford made reference to a contract and
Wickstrom noted that this refers to the City asking the School District to amend the
obligation so that we could use their money to build parts of this path, plus using our own
money. He said that the intent is that we would build it all at once including the piece on
108th; the path on 110th would be opened at the same time the shoulder widening is done
on 108th and at that point the bussing would end. Wickstrom said the only delay could
occur during condemnation which could take up to six months. In response to Brubaker,
Wickstrom stated that during the time of condemnation; as long as the improvements are
not built, the bussing will continue. Radford requested that this bussing situation be put
in writing. Lubovich suggested that a letter of understanding be prepared with both
parties signing.
Committee unanimously agreed that contingent upon the letter of understanding being
written by Public Works to the School District, authorize the construction of 110th walkway
for Meadow Ridge Elementary.
Street Use Ordinance
Lubovich stated that the Mayor is concerned about the structures we have had in the city
where buildings get moved in and situated on lots without being permanently placed. He
said that the conditioning of moving a house thru the City requires a street use permit, and
Lubovich recommended conditioning that permit issuance upon obtaining a building permit
for siting the building before it is moved. Lubovich stated that in talking with Jim Bennett,
Bennett had some concerns about this in that he felt we may be over -regulating.
Committee unanimously recommended approval of the suggested changes to the Street
Use Ordinance.
Ooticom Svstem
Wickstrom explained that Opticom is what gives preemption status to our fire vehicles on
emergency responses and it works off a strobe light system and what we presently have
is very antiquated. We have been having problems with the system over the years and
now we have an opportunity to get a trade-in as a promotional deal with 3M Company,
which would save the City about $75,000. He said since this needs to be done, we should
do it now instead of waiting thru the'°5 budget cycle. He said, if we wait the trade-in deal
won't be there and it will cost us more money. He said we have some money in completed
street projects that we want to reallocate to do this. Clark asked, if the current system is
triggered by other types of vehicles; is there any guarantee that the new system will not
be volatile to that? White explained that it will go to a protection system and the strobe will
only pick up certain patterns.
Committee unanimously recommended implementing the project and establishing the fund
as explained. Bennett concurred with this recommendation by phone, with Wickstrom.
Kent City Council Meeting
Date October 4, 1994
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: JAMES HANKINS - SEWER PERMIT
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Mr. Hankins is a resident in the unin-
corporated portion of West Hill Island who is having problems
with his septic system and wishes to connect to City sewer.
Mr. Hankins' property was removed from the original LID which
provided sewer service to the area due to lack of support for
the project and the required annexation. Mr. Hankins has
executed an annexation covenant and will be charged an equiva-
lent cost to that of the original LID assessment for his
service.
It is the recommendation of the Public Works Committee to
approve the service connection subject to execution of the
covenant and payment of a charge equivalent to the original LID
assessment.
3. EXHIBITS: Public Works minutes, Public Works Director
memorandum and vicinity map
4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (3-0 vote with Bennett
confirming by phone)
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO
[in
7.
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
YES
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 3I
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
September 26, 1994
TO: Public Works Committee
FROM: Don Wickstrom�
RE: John Hankins Side Sewer Connection at 4105 S. 242nd St.
Mr. Hankins has applied for a sewer connection. As noted on the attached map, he lives
in the unincorporated portion of West Hill Island. Mr. Hankins is having problems with his
septic system and desires to connect to the City sewer system which lies adjacent to his
property. His property was removed from the original L.I.D. which provided sewer service
Y to the area due to lack of support for the project and the associated required annexation.
Being unincorporated property providing sewer service thereto is discretionary on the
City's part. Mr. Hankins has executed an annexation covenant and will be charged an
equivalent cost to that of the original L.I.D. assessment for his service. Because of the
recent annexation failure within this area, we seek Council's direction on whether to allow
this service connection or require annexation first.
ACTION: Recommends either; (1) approve the service connection subject to execution
of the covenant and payment of a charge equivalent to the original L.I.D. assessment or,
(2) require annexing to the City prior to connecting to the sewer system.
NOTE: If Committee goes with "Option 2" then we would apply that to all the
unincorporated properties within the West Hill Island area.
HANKINS
y0RTII
11
a I
la
w �J
` I
1
I
DES MOINES
Y II
{{ I
j �Hll
111
. r� /
cc
� r' rri//✓/ '. f— � ���111 k j}} j d / ri✓ ��/�/' /r r
d // l � r ri r , rjj{j r/ %✓/ i / r i/i r/ r/ Z r, r✓ i
rr /' r /� �� i t %�, 11.1 r r i r r pir � C �✓/ r ri/i
o " r r // r 'i� �'r/ r r / qd � r � ri, ✓i'ri �/ r /r /
r � r ./ rr Z�/r✓i i r _Ur / j/i ri/ dOi r %/: t /. i �j�/��:�/�/���//� _�% /�
�-
i ////r j�✓//i ,r Z/ rr�i ✓ r -.� ,ter. i� �rr �, ���%;../� / r r//
/.%o e/i:aL ii rr.rr, of/r ,. ."..,Oo ✓i�„,,-. /.,” r,, ,,. .,,,.. / /// i/'-, A .d i///r „ie./ii �rU :✓/3�/,.r%; �%'.
3YR'�'T"! 1 " 'I frr � ,�/r � �r / / ' gl'M�'S1`'-t�c�—"f—• ,iJri/�j//// ��ks i irr
✓ i r � inn �. � r r r �i���/%%� �.. fir -
r"/ ter/ /✓✓ r �.�� / �fJj. / ���;. ��W // i✓//�j r
12
i
(� James Hankins Sewer Permit
Y Wickstrom explained that an annexation was recently voted down in the West Hill Island
area and Mr. Hankins septic system is now failing and wishes to connect to the city sewer
system. Wickstrom explained that the question is, because of the history of this
annexation, should we provide service to Hankins or should we have him annex in order
to get service. Wickstrom said that in talking to Jim Bennett, Bennett recommended that
Hankins should pay his equivalent LID cost and execute his covenant. Brubaker stated
that we are under no obligation to extend him sewer service at this time.
Committee unanimously recommended approval of the service connection subject to
execution of the covenant and payment of a charge equivalent to the original LID
assessment.
Segregation Request LID #327 and LID #330
Wickstrom stated that Birtcher has sold off some property and wants to segregate out the
assessments.
Committee unanimously recommended Council adopt the resolution for segregation of
Assessment #46 in LID 327 and Assessment #6 in LID 330. Bennett concurred with this
recommendation by phone, with Wickstrom.
Meeting adjourned: 5:20 pm
Kent City Council Meeting
Date October 4, 1994_
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: LID 327 - SnE�GGREGATION REQUEST - RESOLUTION
o
2. SUMMARY SAs recommended by the Public Work l
Comma ee doption o Resolution o. aut rizin the/�,��
segregation of Assessment #45 in LID 327 and do do of ''�-ll
Resolution No. IY69_ authorizing the segregation of Assessment
#46 in LID 327 The property is being divided separately
in ne paying its equal share of the assessment.
3. EXHIBITS: Public Works minutes, Public Works Director
memorandum, resolution and map
4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (3-0 vote with Bennett
confirming by phone)
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 3J
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
September 26, 1994
TO: Public Works Committee
FROM: Don Wickstrom —" V
RE: Segregation Request - LID 327 #46
The Department of Public Works has received a request from Dan Ivanoff of Birtcher Frank
Properties to segregate Assessment #46 of LID 327. This LID is the West Valley Highway
Street Improvements from W. Meeker Street to S. 212th Street. The property is being
divided separately thereby each one paying its equal share of the assessment.
ACTION: Recommend Council adopt Resolution #.
Assessment #46 in LID 327.
for segregation of
f
LU
c
n
W
>
v
J !•1
J ,p
FEN H/Vf7t
14
I23
I
06RIEN
1 ELEMENTARY j
■ SCHOOL
w
B
W
S N >
S, 216 th. ST. I <
I
I F
S� 220TH ST.
� C
61 7
W J
F ! < J O
1 t � �,,w2r �uC S'AUOn
wi
h
PROJECT LOCATION 11 12 t
14 13
5226 TH AVE.
> H S 227TH PL
N C w
>
C z
N
ZLYnT�If���
r
INDUSTRIAL AREA <
22 1
L:NDIND WAY
> r 11
. S. 234TH F
ST
o I 1
K N TNEELY_
3BRI-N
ELEM.
e 2LSTn 31 ;
I'
CL0IJDY ST W
`F S 238TH S i <
S/O
�araEs 14 ! 13 z
C rY KE
�. ST
LID 327
R
10 z
James Hankins Sewer Permit
Wickstrom explained that an annexation was recently voted down in the West Hill Island
area and Mr. Hankins septic system is now failing and wishes to connect to the city sewer
system. Wickstrom explained that the question is, because of the history of this
annexation, should we provide service to Hankins or should we have him annex in order
to get service. Wickstrom said that in talking to Jim Bennett, Bennett recommended that
Hankins should pay his equivalent LID cost and execute his covenant. Brubaker stated
that we are under no obligation to extend him sewer service at this time.
Committee unanimously recommended approval of the service connection subject to
execution of the covenant and payment of a charge equivalent to the original LID
assessment.
Segregation Request LID #327 and LID #330
Wickstrom stated that Birtcher has sold off some property and wants to segregate out the
assessments.
Committee unanimously recommended Council adopt the resolution for segregation of
Assessment #46 in LID 327 and Assessment #6 in LID 330. Bennett concurred with this
recommendation by phone, with Wickstrom.
Meeting adjourned: 5:20 pm
RESOLUTION NO
A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of Kent,
Washington, directing the Finance Director to segregate assessment
number 45 levied under L.I.D. 327.
WHEREAS, on May 2, 1989, the City established assessment number 45 of Local
Improvement District 327 ("LID 32711) in the amount of $226,202.57; and
WHEREAS, Birtcher Frank Properties, the owner of record of the property affected by
assessment number 45, previously requested and obtained a segregation of portions of the
property subject to assessment number 45, creating thereby a revised assessment number 45
together with new assessment numbers 45-1, 45-2 and 45-3; and
WHEREAS, Birtcher Frank Properties has requested segregation of an additional parcel
from the property originally subject to assessment number 45, which shall be designated
assessment number 45-4, and which property is described in the LID segregation application
certificate filed by Birtcher Frank Properties, attached hereto as Exhibit A; and
WHEREAS, the application is in all respects proper; NOW, THEREFORE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON DOES HEREBY
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
1
Section 1. The original tract of assessment number 45 of LID 327, which is legally
described in the LID segregation application certificate filed by Birtcher Frank Properties,
attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference (indicated as "Exhibit A"
on the application certificate), shall have one parcel segregated from the original assessment tract
in accordance with the application of Birtcher Frank Properties.
Section 2. The legal description of the newly segregated parcel is described in the
attached LID segregation application certificate filed by Birtcher Frank Properties (indicated as
"Exhibit B" on the application certificate).
Section 3. The legal description of the remainder of the original tract of assessment
number 45 is described in the attached LID segregation application certificate filed by Birtcher
Frank Properties (indicated as "Exhibit C" on each application certificate).
Section 4. The new assessment amount for the newly segregated tract that will be subject
to assessment 45-4 shall be $19,178.69; the new assessment amount for the remainder of the
property originally subject to assessment number 45 shall be equal to the amount remaining due
under the original assessment number 45 less the assessment amounts now attributed to the tracts
subject to the newly and previously formed assessment numbers 45-1, 45-2, 45-3 and 45-4.
Section 5. The City Clerk shall deliver a certified copy of this resolution to the Finance
Director who shall proceed with the segregation upon being tendered a fee of ten dollars for each
tract of land for which segregation is to be made together with payment to the.City for its
reasonable engineering and clerical costs, as determined by the City's Public Works Department,
that were incurred in making this segregation.
Section 6. The Finance Director is hereby authorized and directed to segregate
assessment number 45 of LID 327 according to the terms stated herein.
2
Passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington this —
day of , 1994.
Concurred in by the Mayor of the City of Kent, Washington, this _ day of ,
1994.
JIM WHITE, MAYOR
ATTEST:
BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ROGER A. LUBOVICH, CITY ATTORNEY
SEGASS#3.327
3
1.
L
CITY OF KENT L.I.D..
DAN IVANOFF
SEP `' 2 199.1
OF KENT
CCOYFER
tTIFICATE
ocal Imp. Distric
ASSESSMENT No. 4
7
V>
/
Owner & Address
ORIGINAL DESCRIPTION Original Amount $
5t4k7tHER FRANK
PROPS
REFER ro ExH 1f31T "A" A T7-AGtwz)
2613 ban'
VE. S.
V,Eyti/A.
98032
if more space needed attach description and refer to Exhibit "A"
Owner & Address
NEW DESCRIPTION New Assessment No. 4-5--4-
New Assessment Amt.
SAME
REFEK To ,EXHIf3rT 14B" ATTACHED
NEW ASSESSMEn/T AV,,11NT Is a• I¢9¢ (/z8,4�
P?, 179. �9
$20.00 Minimum
Fee Received
Receipt F
if more space needed attach description and refer to Exhibit
Owner & Address
REMAINDER DESCRIPTION Rem. Assessment No.
Rem. Original Amt.$
SAME
REFER To EXH1617' "C' AVAcHE:D
if more space needed attach description and refer to Exhibit "C"
hrs at
per hour =
Copy forwarded to City Treasurer and Applicant this day of
, 1g-.
less $20.00 fee
Approved by Resolution #
Total Due
Total Paid
Property Manager
Receipt #
The undersigned hereby accepts above terms and conditions and
certifies to the correctness herein, (Signature must be same as on
application).
SIGNED:uiG—�z4''�`f %tea—r�Tis
wner and/or ur hori�Led Signature
7
V>
45-4 Worksheet
WEST COAST PAPER - BUILDING "N"
LID 327 SEGREGATION WORKSHEET
Assessment #
Balance'
45
157,383.41
46
60,495.52
$217,878.93 [1 ]
Segregations
since last payment
Net Usable Area (sf)
Amount
45-2
139,977
20,907.91
45-3
58,967
8,807.71
198,944 [3]
$29,715.62 [2]
VDL Net Usable Area (sf)> 1,458,684
Less [3] 198,944
1,259,740 [4]
45-4 Net Usable area (sf)>
Outstanding balance/[4]>
128,400 [6]
45-4 Assessment [5] x [6]>
Page 1
$188,163.31 >Outstanding
>balance [1]-[2]
0.149366782 [5]
$19,178.69
EXHIBIT "A"
LID 327 - Assessment Parcel #45
(Tax lot #142204-9007)
THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (SE 1/4
NE 1/4) OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 22 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN,
IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING SOUTH OF THE SOUTH LINE OF SOUTH 228TH
STREET (TAYLOR ROAD);
EXCEPT THE NORTH 229 FEET OF THE EAST 224 FEET OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SAID
NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14;
EXCEPT THE EAST 30 FEET OF THE TOTAL TRACT DESCRIBED ABOVE CONVEYED TO
KING COUNTY FOR ROAD BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 602278;
EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO STATE OF WASHINGTON BY DEED RECORDED UNDER
RECORDING NO. 6515085;
EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF SAID TRACT CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF KENT BY DEED
RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 8808260233, 9005080831, 9005080832, RECORDS OF
KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON:
EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF LOT 4, BLOCK 1, VAN DOREN'S LANDING, ACCORDING TO
THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 158 OF PLATS, PAGES 71 THROUGH 75,
RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 4, THENCE SOUTH 00051'56"
WEST 164.98 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE THEREOF TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING;
THENCE SOUTH 89007'36" EAST 334.21 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00051'56" WEST 270.02 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 4;
THENCE NORTH 89007'36" WEST 284.22 FEET ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE
BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 50.00
FEET;
THENCE WESTERLY, NORTHWESTERLY AND NORTHERLY 78.53 FEET ALONG SAID
CURVE AND SOUTH LINE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 89059'32" TO SAID WEST
LINE OF LOT 4;
THENCE NORTH 00051'56" EAST 220.03 FEET ALONG SAID WEST LINE TO THE TRUE
POINT OF BEGINNING.
EXCEPT LOT 5, BLOCK 1, VAN DOREN'S LANDING, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF
RECORDED IN VOLUME 158 OF PLATS, PAGES 71 THROUGH 75, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY,
WASHINGTON;
TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF LOT 4 IN SAID BLOCK 1 DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 4, THENCE SOUTH 00051'56" WEST
164.98 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE THEREOF;
THENCE SOUTH 89007'36" EAST 334. 21 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE SOUTH 00051'56" WEST 270.02 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 4;
THENCE SOUTH 89007'36" EAST 20.78 FEET ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE BEGINNING OF
A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTH HAVING A RADIUS OF 380.00 FEET;
THENCE EASTERLY 126.01 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE AND SOUTH LINE THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 19000'00" TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 4;
THENCE ALONG SAID EAST LINE THE FOLLOWING THREE COURSES:
THENCE NORTH 19052'24" EAST 93.88 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO
THE WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 300.44 FEET;
THENCE NORTHERLY 99.63 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
19°00'00";
THENCE NORTH 00052'24" EAST 97.87 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 1 IN SAID BLOCK 1;
THENCE NORTH 87015'04" WEST 191.57 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING;
ALSO TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF LOT 6, SAID BLOCK 1 DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 6, THENCE NORTH 89007'36" WEST
186.49 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE THEREOF TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE SOUTH 00052'24" EAST 84.18 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY PROLONGATION OF A
LINE RADIAL TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 6 WHICH BEARS NORTH 71006'52" EAST;
THENCE SOUTH 71006'52" WEST 92.00 FEET ALONG SAID PROLONGATION TO SAID
WESTERLY LINE AND THE BEGINNING OF A NON -TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE
SOUTHWESTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 380.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTHWESTERLY 133.58 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE AND WESTERLY LINE TO THE
NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 6;
THENCE SOUTH 89007'36" EAST 152.69 FEET ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE TRUE POINT
OF BEGINNING;
EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF SAID LOT 5 DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 5, THENCE NORTH 89007'36" WEST
186.49 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE THEREOF;
THENCE NORTH 00052'24" EAST 39.80 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 89007'36" EAST 186.49 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 5;
THENCE SOUTH 00052'24" WEST 39.80 FEET ALONG SAID EAST LINE TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
EXCEPT THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS 3 AND 4, BLOCK 1, VAN DOREN'S LANDING, ACCORDING
TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 158 OF PLATS, PAGES 71 THROUGH 75,
RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS A WHOLE AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 4, THENCE SOUTH 00051'56" WEST
164.98 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE THEREOF; THENCE SOUTH 89°07'36" EAST 334.21 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00052'24" EAST 229.99 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 89007'36" WEST 334.24 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 3;
THENCE SOUTH 00051'56" WEST 65.01 FEET ALONG LAST SAID WEST LINE TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON.
CONTAINING AN AREA OF 1,197,017SQUARE FEET (27.48ACRES) MORE OR LESS.
EXHIBIT "B"
LID 327 - Proposed Assessment Parcel #45-4
THAT PORTION OF LOT K OF CITY OF KENT LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 93-8,
RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 9408171008, LYING WITHIN THE NE
1/4 OF SECTION 14, T. 22 N., R. 4 E., W.M. IN KING COUNTY, WA.
The parcel described above contains a net usable area of 128,400 square feet (2.95 acres) more or
less.
SITUATE IN THE CITY OF KENT, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
EXHIBIT "C"
Remainder Description
THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (SE 1/4
NE 1/4) OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 22 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN,
IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING SOUTH OF THE SOUTH LINE OF SOUTH 228TH
STREET (TAYLOR ROAD);
EXCEPT THE NORTH 229 FEET OF THE EAST 224 FEET OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SAID
NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14;
EXCEPT THE EAST 30 FEET OF THE TOTAL TRACT DESCRIBED ABOVE CONVEYED TO
KING COUNTY FOR ROAD BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 602278;
EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO STATE OF WASHINGTON BY DEED RECORDED UNDER
RECORDING NO. 6515085;
EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF SAID TRACT CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF KENT BY DEED
RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 8808260233, 9005080831, 9005080832, RECORDS OF
KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON:
EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF LOT 4, BLOCK 1, VAN DOREN'S LANDING, ACCORDING TO
THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 158 OF PLATS, PAGES 71 THROUGH 75,
RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 4, THENCE SOUTH 00051'56"
WEST 164.98 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE THEREOF TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING;
THENCE SOUTH 89007'36" EAST 334.21 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00051'56" WEST 270.02 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 4;
THENCE NORTH 89007'36" WEST 284.22 FEET ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE
BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 50.00
FEET;
THENCE WESTERLY, NORTHWESTERLY AND NORTHERLY 78.53 FEET ALONG SAID
CURVE AND SOUTH LINE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 89059'32" TO SAID WEST
LINE OF LOT 4;
THENCE NORTH 00051'56" EAST 220.03 FEET ALONG SAID WEST LINE TO THE TRUE
POINT OF BEGINNING.
EXCEPT LOT 5, BLOCK 1, VAN DOREN'S LANDING, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF
RECORDED IN VOLUME 158 OF PLATS, PAGES 71 THROUGH 75, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY,
WASHINGTON;
TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF LOT 4 IN SAID BLOCK 1 DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 4, THENCE SOUTH 00051'56" WEST
164.98 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE THEREOF;
THENCE SOUTH 89007'36" EAST 334.21 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE SOUTH 00051'56" WEST 270.02 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 4;
THENCE SOUTH 89007'36" EAST 20.78 FEET ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE BEGINNING OF
A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTH HAVING A RADIUS OF 380.00 FEET;
THENCE EASTERLY 126.01 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE AND SOUTH LINE THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 19000'00" TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 4;
THENCE ALONG SAID EAST LINE THE FOLLOWING THREE COURSES:
THENCE NORTH 19052'24" EAST 93.88 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO
THE WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 300.44 FEET;
THENCE NORTHERLY 99.63 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
19°00'00";
THENCE NORTH 00052'24" EAST 97.87 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 1 IN SAID BLOCK 1;
THENCE NORTH 87015'04" WEST 191.57 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING;
ALSO TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF LOT 6, SAID BLOCK 1 DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 6, THENCE NORTH 89°07'36" WEST
186.49 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE THEREOF TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE SOUTH 00052'24" EAST 84.18 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY PROLONGATION OF A
LINE RADIAL TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 6 WHICH BEARS NORTH 71006'52" EAST;
THENCE SOUTH 71006'52" WEST 92.00 FEET ALONG SAID PROLONGATION TO SAID
WESTERLY LINE AND THE BEGINNING OF A NON -TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE
SOUTHWESTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 380.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTHWESTERLY 133.58 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE AND WESTERLY LINE TO THE
NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 6;
THENCE SOUTH 89007'36" EAST 152.69 FEET ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE TRUE POINT
OF BEGINNING;
EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF SAID LOT 5 DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 5, THENCE NORTH 89007'36" WEST
186.49 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE THEREOF;
THENCE NORTH 00052'24" EAST 39.80 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 89007'36" EAST 186.49 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 5;
THENCE SOUTH 00052'24" WEST 39.80 FEET ALONG SAID EAST LINE TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
EXCEPT THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS 3 AND 4, BLOCK 1, VAN DOREN'S LANDING, ACCORDING
TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 158 OF PLATS, PAGES 71 THROUGH 75,
RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS A WHOLE AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 4, THENCE SOUTH 00051'56" WEST
164.98 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE THEREOF; THENCE SOUTH 89007'36" EAST 334.21 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00052'24" EAST 229.99 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 89007'36" WEST 334.24 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 3;
THENCE SOUTH 00051'56" WEST 65.01 FEET ALONG LAST SAID WEST LINE TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF LOT K OF CITY OF KENT LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 93-8,
RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 9408171008, LYING WITHIN THE NE
1/4 OF SECTION 14, T. 22 N., R. 4 E., W.M. IN KING COUNTY, WA.
SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON.
CONTAINING AN AREA OF 1,068,617 SQUARE FEET (24.53ACRES) MORE OR LESS.
CITY O�7 KI_N I
LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT
LANDING
a
368
iii
S89°0'
DELTA
ap
2
2 50.00 78.55
`+J_¢
2-0
fol 2.-10
v
0
g1-
0:
,
H
2-r
N
C Ni
�_7
W
N
u
Imo:
N L
a
368
z 2-8
Z
F !
I
iii
S89°0'
DELTA
I 320.00 13.07'
0220'2('
2 50.00 78.55
'I.
2-0
v
z 2-8
Z
F !
I
NOTE
IT IS THE INTENT OF THIS LOT LINE
ADJUSTMENT TO MERGE EXISTING
LOTS D, G, H 9 J INTO ONE LOT
(LOT K).
LEGEND
-.1- ..•-.-- - PLATTED LOT LINE
- - - - - - - EXISTING LOT LINE PER
( L.L. - 92 - 5. REC. 40.92052011 E8)
CITY OF KENT
ADJUSTED LOT LINE
1/4 Sec. line
I I I 0 200 400
SCALE IN FEET
I" 200'
2-5
. W.........L.... ... L......... _... ............. _ . :\
81
nl I� I I EASELANDSCAPING
2-4
I� r I
4dI---i
—'� 15 SIDEWALK SLOPE
11`I 8 UTILITY EASEAIENI
-40' LANDSCAPE E
I
I
I
2-3
I
II i
I
I.
2 -2.
!- U-0
VAN DOREN`S LANDING
BLOCK 2
pREPARED BY:
BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, INC.
CIVIL ENGINEERS 8 LAND SURVEYORS
SEATTLE, WASHMGTON 313-414.
JOB N0. 92329.03 JAN .1993
NO. RADIUS LENGTH
DELTA
I 320.00 13.07'
0220'2('
2 50.00 78.55
90°00 28
NOTE
IT IS THE INTENT OF THIS LOT LINE
ADJUSTMENT TO MERGE EXISTING
LOTS D, G, H 9 J INTO ONE LOT
(LOT K).
LEGEND
-.1- ..•-.-- - PLATTED LOT LINE
- - - - - - - EXISTING LOT LINE PER
( L.L. - 92 - 5. REC. 40.92052011 E8)
CITY OF KENT
ADJUSTED LOT LINE
1/4 Sec. line
I I I 0 200 400
SCALE IN FEET
I" 200'
2-5
. W.........L.... ... L......... _... ............. _ . :\
81
nl I� I I EASELANDSCAPING
2-4
I� r I
4dI---i
—'� 15 SIDEWALK SLOPE
11`I 8 UTILITY EASEAIENI
-40' LANDSCAPE E
I
I
I
2-3
I
II i
I
I.
2 -2.
!- U-0
VAN DOREN`S LANDING
BLOCK 2
pREPARED BY:
BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, INC.
CIVIL ENGINEERS 8 LAND SURVEYORS
SEATTLE, WASHMGTON 313-414.
JOB N0. 92329.03 JAN .1993
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of Kent,
Washington, directing the Finance Director to segregate a parcel
from assessment number 46 levied under L.I.D. 327.
WHEREAS, on May 2, 1989, the City established assessment number 46 of Local
Improvement District 327 ("LID 327") in the amount of $167,249.03; and
WHEREAS, Birtcher Frank Properties, the owner of record of the property affected by
assessment number 46, previously requested and obtained a segregation of portions of the
property subject to assessment number 46, creating thereby a revised assessment number 46
together with new assessment numbers 46-1 and 46-2, and
WHEREAS, Birtcher Frank Properties has requested segregation of an additional parcel
from the property originally subject to assessment number 46, which shall be designated
assessment number 46-3, and which property is described in the LID segregation application
certificate filed by Birtcher Frank Properties, attached hereto as Exhibit A; and
WHEREAS, the application is in all respects proper, NOW, THEREFORE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON DOES HEREBY
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
1
Section 1. The original tract of assessment number 46 of LID 327, which is legally
described in the LID segregation application certificate filed by Birtcher Frank Properties,
attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference (indicated as "Exhibit A"
on the application certificate), shall have one parcel segregated from the original assessment tract
in accordance with the application of Birtcher Frank Properties.
Section 2. The legal description of the newly segregated parcel is described in the
attached LID segregation application certificate filed by Birtcher Frank Properties (indicated as
"Exhibit B" on the application certificate).
Section 3. The legal description of the remainder of the original tract of assessment
number 46 is described in the attached LID segregation application certificate filed by Birtcher
Frank Properties (indicated as "Exhibit C" on each application certificate).
Section 4. The new assessment amount for the newly segregated tract that will be subject
to assessment 46-3 shall be 523,239.98; the new assessment amount for the remainder of the
property originally subject to assessment number 46 shall be equal to the amount remaining due
under the original assessment number 46 less the assessment amounts now attributed to the tracts
subject to the newly and previously formed assessment numbers 46-1, 46-2 and 46-3.
Section 5. The City Clerk shall deliver a certified copy of this resolution to the Finance
Director who shall proceed with the segregation upon being tendered a fee of ten dollars for each
tract of land for which segregation is to be made together with payment to the City for its
reasonable engineering and clerical costs, as determined by the City's Public Works Department,
that were incurred in making this segregation.
Section 6. The Finance Director is hereby authorized and directed to segregate
assessment number 46 of LID 327 according to the terms stated herein.
2
Passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington this —
day of , 1994.
Concurred in by the Mayor of the City of Kent, Washington, this _ day of ,
1994.
JIM WHITE, MAYOR
ATTEST:
BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ROGER A. LUBOVICH, CITY ATTORNEY
SEGASS94.327
3
CITY OF KENT L.I.D. SEGREGATION CERTIFICATE
Requested y: �atef!:J,1 �` _+ cal Imp. District No.
C)AN IVAIVOFF SEP 2n- '1994
-ATY OF KENT
ASSESSMENT No.—Ao_
Owner & Address
ORIGINAL DESCRIPTION Original Amount $
BlRMFtM FRANK
PI?oPER
VE.S. RESER To ExHIl3/T "A" A77'AGtt�p
X6/3 GSA'
KFJJT; WA
98032
if more space needed attach description and refer to Exhibit "A"
Owner & Address
NEW DESCRIPTION New Assessment No.
New Assessment Amt. 2
SAME
REFER To ExtymIJ' ",g" ATTACHED
NEW ASSESSMENT Aft uNT /5 � ,1449¢ (155;'5
_
23,239
$20.00 Minimum
Fee Received
T,. /19 'f
Receipt #iJy;/,
if more space needed attach description and refer to Exhibit "B"
Owner & Address
REMAINDER DESCRIPTION Rem. Assessment No.
Rem. Original Amt.$
SAME
REFER To EXHIBIT "C' AVACHED
if more space needed attach description and refer to Exhibit "C"
rs at
per hour =
Copy forwarded to City Treasurer and Applicant this day of
19
less $20.00 fee
Approved by Resolution H
Total Due
Total Paid
roper y Manager
Receipt N
The undersigned hereby accepts above terns and conditions and
certifies to the correctness herein, (Signature must be same as on
application).
SIGNED: / CcccG��^t`=�4L�� -`✓�eZ
,Owner and/or Aurthori4edSIgna ure
RD
9°)
46-3 Worksheet
WEST COAST PAPER - BUILDING "N"
LID 327 SEGREGATION WORKSHEET
Assessment #
Balance'
45
157,383.41
j
60,495.52
45
$217,878.93 [11
Segregations
since last payment
Net Usable Area (sf)
Amount
45-2
139,977
20,907.91
45-3
58,967
8,807.71
198,944 [3]
$29,715.62 [2]
VDL Net Usable Area (sf)> 1,458,684
Less [3] 198,944 i
1,259,740 [4]
46-3 Net Usable area (sf)>
Outstanding balance/[4]>
155,590 [6]
46-3 Assessment [5] x [6]>
Page 1
$188,163.31 '>Outstanding
>balance [11-[21
0.149366782 [5]
$23,239.98
EXHIBIT "A"
LID 327 - Assessment Parcel #46
(Tax lot #142204-9016)
THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (NE 1/4 SE 1/4) OF SECTION
14, TOWNSHIP 22 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY,
WASHINGTON;
EXCEPT THE EAST 30 FEET THEREOF CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD BY
DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 602278;
AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONDEMNED FOR DRAINAGE DITCH RIGHT-OF-
WAY IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NO. 32912;
AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY DRAINAGE
DISTRICT NO. 1 BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 4806961;
AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF SAID TRACT CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF KENT BY DEED
RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 9005080832.
EXCEPT THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL:
THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS 1, 2, 3, 4, AND 5 BLOCK 2, VAN DOREN'S LANDING, ACCORDING TO
THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 158 OF PLATS, PAGES 71 THROUGH 75
INCLUSIVE, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 4 IN SAID BLOCK 2 AND THE EAST
MARGIN OF 64TH AVENUE SOUTH, AS SAID AVENUE IS SHOWN AND SO DESIGNATED ON
SAID PLAT; THENCE NORTH 00'52'24" EAST 559.00 FEET ALONG SAID EAST MARGIN;
THENCE SOUTH 890 0736" EAST 368.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE
7'
SOUTH 00 ° 52'24" WEST 435.26 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89° 07'36" EAST 100.00 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 000 52'24" WEST 331.12 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF DRAINAGE
DISTRICT RIGHT-OF-WAY CONDEMNED IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NO. 32912;
THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE THE FOLLOWING THREE COURSES:
THENCE NORTH 360 12' 57" EAST 164.62 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 890 02'03" EAST 323.72 FEET
TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 890 02,03" EAST
33.79 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00° 52'24" EAST 259.59 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89° 07'36" EAST
35.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00° 52'24" EAST 26.47 FEET; THENCE NORTH 140 03,18" EAST
55.00 FEET ALONG A RADIAL LINE TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY MARGIN OF LANDING WAY AS
SAID WAY IS SHOWN AND SO DESIGNATED ON SAID PLAT AND THE BEGINNING OF A NON -
TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 380.00 FEET; THENCE
NORTHWESTERLY AND NORTHERLY 442.07 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE AND SOUTHWESTERLY
MARGIN THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 660 39'17" TO A RADIAL LINE OF SAID CURVE
WHICH BEARS SOUTH 800 42'35" WEST; THENCE SOUTH 80'42'35" WEST 56.00 FEET ALONG
SAID RADIAL LINE; THENCE NORTH 89° 07'36" WEST 257.77 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING, AND;
THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS 3, 4, 5 AND 6, BLOCK 2, VAN DOREN'S LANDING, ACCORDING TO
THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 158 OF PLATS, PAGES 71 THROUGH 75
INCLUSIVE, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 4 IN SAID BLOCK 2 AND THE EAST MARGIN
OF 64TH AVENUE SOUTH, AS SAID AVENUE IS SHOWN AND SO DESIGNATED ON SAID PLAT;
THENCE NORTH 000 52'24" EAST 559.00 FEET ALONG SAID EAST MARGIN; THENCE SOUTH
890 07'36" EAST 368.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00° 52'24" WEST 435.26 FEET; THENCE SOUTH
890 07'36" EAST 100.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00° 52' 24" WEST 331.12 FEET TO THE
SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 3; THENCE SOUTH 36° 12'57" WEST 151.38 FEET ALONG
SAID SOUTHEASTERLY LINE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 3; THENCE NORTH 89102,03"
WEST 372.78 FEET ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE TO SAID EAST MARGIN OF 64TH AVENUE
SOUTH; THENCE NORTH 00° 27' 19" WEST 330.36 FEET ALONG SAID EAST MARGIN TO THE
POINT OF BEGINNING.
SITUATE IN THE CITY OF KENT, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
CONTAINING AN AREA OF 991,044SQUARE FEET (22.75ACRES) MORE OR LESS.
EXHIBIT "B"
LID 327 - Proposed Assessment Parcel #46-3
THAT PORTION OF LOT K OF CITY OF KENT LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 93-8,
RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 9408171008, LYING WITHIN THE SE
1/4 OF SECTION 14, T. 22 N., R. 4 E., W.M. IN KING COUNTY, WA.
The parcel described above contains a net usable area of 155,590 square feet (3.57acres) more or
less.
SITUATE IN THE CITY OF KENT, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
EXHIBIT "C"
LID 327 Remainder Description - Assessment Parcel #46
THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (NE 1/4 SE 1/4) OF SECTION
14, TOWNSHIP 22 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY,
WASHINGTON;
EXCEPT THE EAST 30 FEET THEREOF CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD BY
DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 602278;
AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONDEMNED FOR DRAINAGE DITCH RIGHT-OF-
WAY IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NO. 32912;
AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY DRAINAGE
DISTRICT NO. 1 BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 4806961;
AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF SAID.TRACT CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF KENT BY DEED
RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 9005080832.
EXCEPT THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL:
THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS 1, 2, 3, 4, AND 5 BLOCK 2, VAN DOREN'S LANDING, ACCORDING TO
THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 158 OF PLATS, PAGES 71 THROUGH 75
INCLUSIVE, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 4 IN SAID BLOCK 2 AND THE EAST
MARGIN OF 64TH AVENUE SOUTH, AS SAID AVENUE IS SHOWN AND SO DESIGNATED ON
SAID PLAT; THENCE NORTH 00° 52'24" EAST 559.00 FEET ALONG SAID EAST MARGIN;
THENCE SOUTH 89' 07'36" EAST 368.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE
SOUTH 00 °, 52'24" WEST 435.26 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89' 07' 36" EAST 100.00 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 000 52'24" WEST 331.12 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF DRAINAGE
DISTRICT RIGHT-OF-WAY CONDEMNED IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NO. 32912
THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE THE FOLLOWING THREE COURSES:
THENCE NORTH 360 12'57" EAST 164.62 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 890 02'03" EAST 323.72 FEET
TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 89'02'03" EAST
33.79 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00° 52'24" EAST 259.59 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89' 07,36" EAST
35.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00' 52'24" EAST 26.47 FEET; THENCE NORTH 14' 03,18" EAST
55.00 FEET ALONG A RADIAL LINE TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY MARGIN OF LANDING WAY AS
SAID WAY IS SHOWN AND SO DESIGNATED ON SAID PLAT AND THE BEGINNING OF A NON -
TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 380.00 FEET; THENCE
NORTHWESTERLY AND NORTHERLY 442.07 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE AND SOUTHWESTERLY
MARGIN THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 66' 39'17" TO A RADIAL LINE OF SAID CURVE
WHICH BEARS SOUTH 80' 42'35" WEST; THENCE SOUTH 80142'35" WEST 56.00 FEET ALONG
SAID RADIAL LINE; THENCE NORTH 89' 07'36" WEST 257.77 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING, AND;
THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS 3, 4, 5 AND 6, BLOCK 2, VAN DOREN'S LANDING, ACCORDING TO
THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 158 OF PLATS, PAGES 71 THROUGH 75
INCLUSIVE, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 4 IN SAID BLOCK 2 AND THE EAST MARGIN
OF 64TH AVENUE SOUTH, AS SAID AVENUE IS SHOWN AND SO DESIGNATED ON SAID PLAT;
THENCE NORTH 000 52'24" EAST 559.00 FEET ALONG SAID EAST MARGIN; THENCE SOUTH
890 07'36" EAST 368.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00° 52'24" WEST 435.26 FEET; THENCE SOUTH
890 07'36" EAST 100.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00° 52' 24" WEST 331.12 FEET TO THE
SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 3; THENCE SOUTH 360 12'57" WEST 151.38 FEET ALONG
SAID SOUTHEASTERLY LINE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 3; THENCE NORTH 890 02,03"
WEST 372.78 FEET ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE TO SAID EAST MARGIN OF 64TH AVENUE
SOUTH; THENCE NORTH 000 2T1 9" WEST 330.36 FEET ALONG SAID EAST MARGIN TO THE
POINT OF BEGINNING, AND;
THAT PORTION OF LOT K OF CITY OF KENT LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 93-8,
RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 9408171008, LYING WITHIN THE SE
1/4 OF SECTION 14, T. 22 N., R. 4 E., W.M. IN KING COUNTY, WA.
SITUATE IN THE CITY OF KENT, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
E
CITY OF KENT
LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT
v ... , v L I A
N0. RADIUS LENGTH DELTA
I 320.00 13.07' 02°20'26 1
2 50.00 78.55 90°00 28 Il
1 2-4 1 2-2
II
°Q j II L--
-'(ic--I-15' SICEWALx SLOPE
ISI 8 UTILITY EASEMENT I
I
........__ ...................................._ ....... ..._.............
'�----40' LANDSCAPE ESM'T. i ------
-_---___
j 2 - 3 I /
I 1�
I /
VAN DOREN'S LANDING
liW
PREPARED BY :
BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, INC.
CIVIL ENGINEERS 8 LAND SURVEYORS
SEATTLE, WASHINOTON 373'4,4.
JOB NO. 92329.03 JAN., 1993
NOTE'
IT IS THE
INTENT OF THIS LOT LINE:
ADJUSTMENT TO MERGE EXISTING
LOTS D, G,
H 8 J INTO ONE LOT
(LOT K).
LANDING
lNq
Y
LEGEND
N ;FzW
_,
--
- PLATTED LOT LINE
- — - — — —
— EXISTING LOT LINE PER
(L.L. - 92 - 5 , REC. NO.9205201168 )
1
3 V
�!ol
'+\
CITY OF KENT
ADJUSTED LOT LINE
2-10
9_9
10
'
I 1
N
H...._....... • W
�4 Sec
.Iirse
41
Z
2-8 I
2-7
I
:I
L1_I
-----------
z-
LLI.I...
j
I
. 0
200 400
Q
ri
I
{
E
I
SCALE IN FEET
^o -- - 368.00' - -_
i = 200
I S 89007 36 E ------------
------ --_ J-(1
-
i
I. 2-6
2-5 \
\
I I
Iw
\
r .. L ................_. _.. _.
}..... _I ................_..._..............._.._._...
cI f I
25 'ELANDSCAPING
5
1 2-4 1 2-2
II
°Q j II L--
-'(ic--I-15' SICEWALx SLOPE
ISI 8 UTILITY EASEMENT I
I
........__ ...................................._ ....... ..._.............
'�----40' LANDSCAPE ESM'T. i ------
-_---___
j 2 - 3 I /
I 1�
I /
VAN DOREN'S LANDING
liW
PREPARED BY :
BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, INC.
CIVIL ENGINEERS 8 LAND SURVEYORS
SEATTLE, WASHINOTON 373'4,4.
JOB NO. 92329.03 JAN., 1993
Kent City Council Meeting
Date October 4, 1994
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: LID 330 - SEGREGATION REQUEST - RESOLUTION
Z, EMENT• _ As recommended by the Public Works
LResolution
ittee doption of 12esolution No. / D authorizing there �)
ega on of Assessment #6 in LID 330 and doption o
No. /5110 authorizing the segregation o Assessment
n LID 330 The property is being divided separately
e v one paying its equal share of the assessment.
3. EXHIBITS: Public Works minutes, Public Works Director
memorandum, resolution and map
4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (3-0 vote with Bennett
confirming by phone)
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES
go
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 3K
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
September 26, 1994
TO: Public Works Committee
FROM: Don Wickstrom� �)
RE: Segregation Request - LID 330 Parcel #6
The Department of Public Works has received a request from Dan Ivanoff of Birtcher Frank
Properties to segregate Assessment #6 of LID 330. This LID is the 64th Avenue Street
Improvements from James Street to S. 212th Street. The property is being divided into
two parcels thereby each one paying its equal share of the assessment.
ACTION: Recommend Council adopt Resolution #.
Assessment #6 in LID 330.
for segregation of
114
23
� s
OBHIEN 1 r�
ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL i
L.
W
_I S. 216 th. ST. r- I >
I1 <
� � G
I
I
D
S, 2207H ST. 1 \
a
W � L
f �wPr l„� �'A li0 ft
11 12
14 13
i.
_ G 777TH PL
I
KEN'
OMMON!
James Hankins Sewer Eermit
Wickstrom explained that an annexation was recently voted down in the West Hill Island
area and Mr. Hankins septic system is now failing and wishes to connect to the city sewer
system. Wickstrom explained that the question is, because of the history of this
annexation, should we provide service to Hankins or should we have him annex in order
to get service. Wickstrom said that in talking to Jim Bennett, Bennett recommended that
Hankins should pay his equivalent LID cost and execute his covenant. Brubaker stated
that we are under no obligation to extend him sewer service at this time.
Committee unanimously recommended approval of the service connection subject to
execution of the covenant and payment of a charge equivalent to the original LID
assessment.
Segregation Request LID #327 and LID #330
Wickstrom stated that Birtcher has sold off some property and wants to segregate out the
assessments.
Committee unanimously recommended Council adopt the resolution for segregation of
Assessment #46 in LID 327 and Assessment #6 in LID 330. Bennett concurred with this
recommendation by phone, with Wickstrom.
Meeting adjourned: 5:20 pm
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of Kent,
Washington, directing the Finance Director to segregate assessment
number 6 levied under L.I.D. 330.
WHEREAS, on May 15, 1990, the City established assessment number 6 of Local
Improvement District 330 ("LID 330") in the amount of $869,339.42;
WHEREAS, Birtcher Frank Properties, the owner of record of the property affected by
assessment number 6, previously requested and obtained segregations of portions of the property
subject to assessment number 6, creating thereby a revised assessment number 6 together with new
assessment numbers 6-1 and 6-2; and
WHEREAS, Birtcher Frank Properties has requested segregation of an additional parcel
from the property originally subject to assessment number 6, which shall be designated assessment
number 6-3, and which property is described in the LID segregation application certificate filed by
Birtcher Frank Properties, attached hereto as Exhibit A, and
WHEREAS, the application is in all respects proper; NOW, THEREFORE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON DOES HEREBY
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
1
Section 1. The original tract of assessment number 6 of LID 330, which is legally
described in the LID segregation application certificate filed by Birtcher Frank Properties,
attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference (indicated as "Exhibit A"
on the application certificate), shall have one parcel segregated from the original assessment tract,
in accordance with the application of Birtcher Frank Properties.
Section 2. The legal description of the segregated parcel is described in the attached LID
segregation application certificates filed by Birtcher Frank Properties (indicated as "Exhibit B" on
the application certificate).
Section 3. The legal description of the remainder of the original tract of assessment
number 6 is described in the attached LID segregation application certificates filed by Birtcher
Frank Properties (indicated as "Exhibit C" on the application certificate).
Section 4. The new assessment amount for the newly segregated tract that will be subject
to assessment 6-3 shall be $42,882.18; the new assessment amount for the remainder of the
property originally subject to assessment number 6 shall be equal to the amount remaining due
under the original assessment number 6 less the assessment amounts now attributed to the tracts
subject to the newly and previously formed assessment numbers 6-1,6-2 and 6-3.
Section 5. The City Clerk shall deliver a certified copy of this resolution to the Finance
Director who shall proceed with the segregation upon being tendered a fee of ten dollars for each
tract of land for which segregation is to be made together with payment to the City for its
reasonable engineering and clerical costs, as determined by the City's Public Works Department,
that were incurred in making this segregation.
Section 6. The Finance Director is hereby authorized and directed to segregate
assessment number 6 of LID 330 according to the terms stated herein.
2
Passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the city of Kent, Washington this
day of , 1994.
Concurred in by the Mayor of the City of Kent, Washington, this _ day of , 1994.
JM WHITE, MAYOR
ATTEST:
BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ROGER A. LUBOVICH, CITY ATTORNEY
SEGASS94.330
3
r
eques
CITY OF KENT L.I.D.
DAN WANOFF
SEGREGATION CERTIFICATE
A-3) A i! T-1
)lDai'ea\ J! J. /Local Imp.
I
strict No.
SEP Z2 19.,4
ASSESSMENT No.
1 Y OF C EHT
7
Owner & Address
ORIGINAL DESCRIPTION Original Amount $
OMHER FRANK
ROPER'
�6.F'E9 To EXHIBIT It "A A TT'Ac Ea
26
1/E. S.
CFl✓7 WA
98x32
if more space needed attach description and refer to Exhibit "A"
Owner & Address
NEW DESCRIPTION New Assessment No. 6 `3
New Assessment Amt.7;
SAME
REFEK Ta EXH11:11T toB" ATTACHED
NEW ASSESSMEAIT AA10t1NT 15 - 6.2796 (ISS,
= 13 ¢Z, FS2 . /F
$20.00 Minimum
Fee Received
� /) �- /I 1%{
Receipt` /. 73i
if more space needed attach description and refer to Exhibit "B")
Owner & Address
REMAINDER DESCRIPTION Rem. Assessment No.
Rem. Original Amt.$
SAME
PEFER To EM16l7- "C" A?TAGHEp
if more s ace needed attach description and refer to Exhibit "C"
rs at
per hour =
Copy forwarded to City Treasurer and Applicant this day of
, 19
less $20.00 fee
Approved by Resolution #
Total Due
Total Paid
Property Manager
Receipt #
The undersigned hereby accepts above terns and conditions and
certifies to the correctness herein, (Signature must be same as on
application).<--
5 Z7 « �T
�
SIGNED: C v " "
wner an or urtftort zea—Signature
7
6-3 Worksheet
WEST COAST PAPER - BUILDING "N"
LID 330 SEGREGATION WORKSHEET
Assessment #
9
Segregations
since last payment
7-2
7-3
Net Usable Area (sf)
139,977
58,967
198,944 [3]
VDL Net Usable Area (sf)> 2,437,435
Less [3] 198,944
2,238,491 [4]
Outstanding balance/[4]>
6-3 Net Usable area (sf)> 155,590 [6]
6-3 Assessment [5] x [6]>
Page 1
Balance'
459,472.30
97,468.80
114,840.67
$671,781.77 [1]
Amount
38,579.08
16,251.90
$54,830.98 [2]
$616,950.79 >Outstanding
>balance [1]-[2]
0.275610128 [5]
$42,882.18
EXHIBIT "A"
LID 330 - Assessment Parcel #6
(Tax lot #142204-9015)
THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (NE 1/4 SE 1/4) OF SECTION
14, TOWNSHIP 22 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY,
WASHINGTON;
EXCEPT THE EAST 30 FEET THEREOF CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD BY
DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 602278;
AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONDEMNED FOR DRAINAGE DITCH RIGHT-OF-
WAY IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NO. 32912;
AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY DRAINAGE
DISTRICT NO. 1 BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 4806961;
AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF SAID TRACT CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF KENT BY DEED
RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 9005080832.
EXCEPT THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL:
THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS 1, 2, 3, 4, AND 5 BLOCK 2, VAN DOREN'S LANDING, ACCORDING TO
THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 158 OF PLATS, PAGES 71 THROUGH 75
INCLUSIVE, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 4 IN SAID BLOCK 2 AND THE EAST
MARGIN OF 64TH AVENUE SOUTH, AS SAID AVENUE IS SHOWN AND SO DESIGNATED ON
SAID PLAT; THENCE NORTH 00° 52'24" EAST 559.00 FEET ALONG SAID EAST MARGIN;
THENCE SOUTH 890 07"16" EAST 368.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE
SOUTH 00 ° 52'24" WEST 435.26 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89° 07'36" EAST 100.00 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 000 52'24" WEST 331.12 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF DRAINAGE
DISTRICT RIGHT-OF-WAY CONDEMNED IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NO. 32912;
THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE THE FOLLOWING THREE COURSES:
THENCE NORTH 360 12'57" EAST 164.62 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 890 02'03" EAST 323.72 FEET
TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 89'02'03" EAST
33.79 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00° 52'24" EAST 259.59 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89° 07,36" EAST
35.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00° 52'24" EAST 26.47 FEET; THENCE NORTH 14° 03,18" EAST
55.00 FEET ALONG A RADIAL LINE TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY MARGIN OF LANDING WAY AS
SAID WAY IS SHOWN AND SO DESIGNATED ON SAID PLAT AND THE BEGINNING OF A NON -
TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 380.00 FEET; THENCE
NORTHWESTERLY AND NORTHERLY 442.07 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE AND SOUTHWESTERLY
MARGIN THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 660 39'17" TO A RADIAL LINE OF SAID CURVE
WHICH BEARS SOUTH 800 42'35" WEST; THENCE SOUTH 800 42'35" WEST 56.00 FEET ALONG
SAID RADIAL LINE; THENCE NORTH 89° 07'36" WEST 257.77 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING, AND;
THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS 3, 4, 5 AND 6, BLOCK 2, VAN DOREN'S LANDING, ACCORDING TO
THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 158 OF PLATS, PAGES 71 THROUGH 75
INCLUSIVE, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 4 IN SAID BLOCK 2 AND THE EAST MARGIN
OF 64TH AVENUE SOUTH, AS SAID AVENUE IS SHOWN AND SO DESIGNATED ON SAID PLAT;
THENCE NORTH 000 52'24" EAST 559.00 FEET ALONG SAID EAST MARGIN; THENCE SOUTH
890 07'36" EAST 368.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00° 52'24" WEST 435.26 FEET; THENCE SOUTH
890 07'36" EAST 100.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00° 52' 24" WEST 331.12 FEET TO THE
SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 3; THENCE SOUTH 36° 12'57" WEST 151.38 FEET ALOE:
SAID SOUTHEASTERLY LINE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 3; THENCE NORTH 890 02,03""
WEST 372.78 FEET ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE TO SAID EAST MARGIN OF 64TH AVENUE
SOUTH; THENCE NORTH 00° 27' 19" WEST 330.36 FEET ALONG SAID EAST MARGIN TO THE
POINT OF BEGINNING.
SITUATE IN THE CITY OF KENT, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
CONTAINING AN AREA OF 991,044SQUARE FEET (22.75ACRES) MORE OR LESS.
EXHIBIT "B"
LID 330 - Proposed Assessment Parcel #6-3
THAT PORTION OF LOT K OF CITY OF KENT LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 93-8,
RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 9408171008, LYING WITHIN THE SE
1/4 OF SECTION 14, T. 22 N., R. 4 E., W.M. IN KING COUNTY, WA.
The parcel described above contains a net usable area of 155,590 square feet (3.57acres) more or
less.
SITUATE IN THE CITY OF KENT, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
EXHIBIT "C"
LID 330 Remainder Description - Assessment Parcel #6
THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (NE 1/4 SE 1/4) OF SECTION
14, TOWNSHIP 22 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY,
WASHINGTON;
EXCEPT THE EAST 30 FEET THEREOF CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD BY
DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 602278;
AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONDEMNED FOR DRAINAGE DITCH RIGHT-OF-
WAY IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NO. 32912;
AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY DRAINAGE
DISTRICT NO. 1 BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 4806961;
AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF SAID TRACT CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF KENT BY DEED
RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 9005080832.
EXCEPT THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL:
THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS 1, 2, 3, 4, AND 5 BLOCK 2, VAN DOREN'S LANDING, ACCORDING TO
THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 158 OF PLATS, PAGES 71 THROUGH 75
INCLUSIVE, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 4 IN SAID BLOCK 2 AND THE EAST
MARGIN OF 64TH AVENUE SOUTH, AS SAID AVENUE IS SHOWN AND SO DESIGNATED ON
SAID PLAT; THENCE NORTH 00° 52'24" EAST 559.00 FEET ALONG SAID EAST MARGIN;
THENCE SOUTH 89' 07'36" EAST 368.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE
SOUTH 00 ° 52'24" WEST 435.26 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89° 07'36" EAST 100.00 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 000 52'24" WEST 331.12 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF DRAINAGE
DISTRICT RIGHT-OF-WAY CONDEMNED IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NO. 32912-
THENCE
2912THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE THE FOLLOWING THREE COURSES:
THENCE NORTH 360 12' 57" EAST 164.62 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 890 02'03" EAST 323.72 FEET
TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 890 02'03" EAST
33.79 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00° 52'24" EAST 259.59 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89° 07,36" EAST
35.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00° 52'24" EAST 26.47 FEET; THENCE NORTH 14° 03,18" EAST
55.00 FEET ALONG A RADIAL LINE TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY MARGIN OF LANDING WAY AS
SAID WAY IS SHOWN AND SO DESIGNATED ON SAID PLAT AND THE BEGINNING OF A NON -
TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 380.00 FEET; THENCE
NORTHWESTERLY AND NORTHERLY 442.07 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE AND SOUTHWESTERLY
MARGIN THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 660 39'17" TO A RADIAL LINE OF SAID CURVE
WHICH BEARS SOUTH 80° 42'35" WEST; THENCE SOUTH 80'42'35" WEST 56.00 FEET ALONG
SAID RADIAL LINE; THENCE NORTH 89° 07'36" WEST 257.77 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING, AND;
THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS 3, 4, 5 AND 6, BLOCK 2, VAN DOREN'S LANDING, ACCORDING TO
THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 158 OF PLATS, PAGES 71 THROUGH 75
INCLUSIVE, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 4 IN SAID BLOCK 2 AND THE EAST MARGIN
OF 64TH AVENUE SOUTH, AS SAID AVENUE IS SHOWN AND SO DESIGNATED ON SAID PLAT;
THENCE NORTH 000 52'24" EAST 559.00 FEET ALONG SAID EAST MARGIN; THENCE SOUTH
890 07'36" EAST 368.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00° 52'24" WEST 435.26 FEET; THENCE SOUTH
890 07'36" EAST 100.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00° 52' 24" WEST 331.12 FEET TO THE
SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 3; THENCE SOUTH 36° 12'57" WEST 151.38 FEET ALONG
SAID SOUTHEASTERLY LINE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 3; THENCE NORTH 890 02,03"
WEST 372.78 FEET ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE TO SAID EAST MARGIN OF 64TH AVENUE
SOUTH; THENCE NORTH 001 27' 19" WEST 330.36 FEET ALONG SAID EAST MARGIN TO THE
POINT OF BEGINNING, AND;
THAT PORTION OF LOT K OF CITY OF KENT LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 93-8,
RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 9408171008, LYING WITHIN THE SE
1/4 OF SECTION 14, T. 22 N., R. 4 E., W.M. IN KING COUNTY, WA.
SITUATE IN THE CITY OF KENT, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
CITY OF KENT
LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT
LANDING
W
368.00 -
S 89-07a6"E
2-6
II
T
co
F
Ix I
2-5
..... .... ...._..........1.........i.........._.._.._.
.......... ..................------
81
m Zvi
R*
2 -4
4d]
15. SIDEWALK SLOPE
a UTILITY EASEMENT
I L ' —40' LANDSCAPE ESM'T,
I
2
I.
25'
NOTE 1
IT IS THE INTENT OF THIS LOT LINE.
ADJUSTMENT TO MERGE EXISTING
LOTS D, G, H 8 i INTO ONE LOT
(LOT K).
LEGEND
.......................... .. PLATTED LOT LINE
-------EXISTING LOT LINE PER
(L.L. - 92 •5 , REC. NO.9205201188)
CITY OF KENT
- AD.USTED LOT LINE
Sec. lint
/Y'81*04' ow
I I 1 0 200 400
.. ................... nns-v���
SCALE IN FEET
200
LANDSCAPING J
7MFNT
2 -2
I- 1;-q:)
VAN DOREN'S LANDING
BLOCK 2
PREPARED BY:
BUSH, ROED & F-7CHINGS, INC.
CIVIL ENGINEERS A LINO SURVEYORS
SEATTLE. WASHNGMN 323-4141
JOB NO. 9232903 JAh 1997
NO. RADIUS
LENGTH DELTA
I 0.00�
7 07' 02'20'26"
2 .00
8.55 9Q00 28
NOTE 1
IT IS THE INTENT OF THIS LOT LINE.
ADJUSTMENT TO MERGE EXISTING
LOTS D, G, H 8 i INTO ONE LOT
(LOT K).
LEGEND
.......................... .. PLATTED LOT LINE
-------EXISTING LOT LINE PER
(L.L. - 92 •5 , REC. NO.9205201188)
CITY OF KENT
- AD.USTED LOT LINE
Sec. lint
/Y'81*04' ow
I I 1 0 200 400
.. ................... nns-v���
SCALE IN FEET
200
LANDSCAPING J
7MFNT
2 -2
I- 1;-q:)
VAN DOREN'S LANDING
BLOCK 2
PREPARED BY:
BUSH, ROED & F-7CHINGS, INC.
CIVIL ENGINEERS A LINO SURVEYORS
SEATTLE. WASHNGMN 323-4141
JOB NO. 9232903 JAh 1997
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of Kent,
Washington, directing the Finance Director to segregate assessment
number 7 levied under L.I.D. 330.
WHEREAS, on May 15, 1990, the City established assessment number 7 of Local
Improvement District 330 ("LID 330") in the amount of $181,099.25, and
WHEREAS, Birtcher Frank Properties, the owner of record of the property affected by
assessment number 7, previously requested and obtained segregations of portions of the property
subject to assessment number 7, creating thereby a revised assessment number 7 together with new
assessment numbers 7-1, 7-2 and 7-3; and
WHEREAS, Birtcher Frank Properties has requested segregation of an additional parcel
from the property originally subject to assessment number 7, which shall be designated assessment
number 7-4, and which property is described in the LID segregation application certificate filed by
Birtcher Frank Properties, attached hereto as Exhibit A; and
WHEREAS, the application is in all respects proper; NOW, THEREFORE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON DOES HEREBY
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
1
Section 1. The original tract of assessment number 7 of LID 330, which is legally
described in the LID segregation application certificate filed by Birtcher Frank Properties,
attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference (indicated as "Exhibit A"
on the application certificate), shall have one parcel segregated from the original assessment tract,
in accordance with the application of Birtcher Frank Properties.
Section 2. The legal description of the segregated parcel is described in the attached LID
segregation application certificates filed by Birtcher Frank Properties (indicated as "Exhibit B" on
the application certificate).
Section 3. The legal description of the remainder of the original tract of assessment
number 7 is described in the attached LID segregation application certificates filed by Birtcher
Frank Properties (indicated as "Exhibit C" on the application certificate).
Section 4. The new assessment amount for the newly segregated tract that will be subjec`
to assessment 7-4 shall be $35,388.34; the new assessment amount for the remainder of the
property originally subject to assessment number 7 shall be equal to the amount remaining due
under the original assessment number 7 less the assessment amounts now attributed to the tracts
subject to the newly and previously formed assessment numbers 7-1,7-2, 7-3 and 7-4.
Section 5. The City Clerk shall deliver a certified copy of this resolution to the Finance
Director who shall proceed with the segregation upon being tendered a fee of ten dollars for each
tract of land for which segregation is to be made together with payment to the City for its
reasonable engineering and clerical costs, as determined by the City's Public Works Department,
that were incurred in making this segregation.
Section 6. The Finance Director is hereby authorized and directed to segregate
assessment number 7 of LID 330 according to the terms stated herein.
VJ
Passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the city of Kent, Washington this
day of , 1994.
Concurred in by the Mayor of the City of Kent, Washington, this _ day of , 1994.
JIM WHITE, MAYOR
ATTEST:
BRENDA JACOBER CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ROGER A. LUBOVICH, CITY ATTORNEY
SEGASS#3.330
3
F
eques
CITY OF KENT L.I.D
S_EGREGATION_CERTIFICATE
Jl Dater !i. '_`'Local Imp
DAN 1VAIVOFF SEP l:. 1S911
vS i�I"
UF KFHT
F i�l!T CEPl LFq
s
ASSESSMENT No. 7
Owner & Address
T /_'13 1
ORIGINAL DESCRIPTION Original Amount $
PROPERTMS
REFEP, To EXH1f317_ "A" ATTAGttED
26/3 (oaf'
YE.5.
CE&tr WA
8032
1780-32
"A"
if more s ace needed attach description and refer to Exhibit
Owner & Address
NEW DESCRIPTION New Assessment No.
New Assessment Amt.T]�4�
GAME
REEEK To FIX"113r "B" ATTACHED
NEW 4_ SESSMEAIT AMOUNT Is= O.27%(/28, 4
_ � 3s, 388'. 3�•
$20.00 Minimum
Fee Received
Receipt /ayii
if more space needed attach descrip tion and refer to Exhibit "B"
Owner & Address
REMAINDER DESCRIPTION Rem. Assessment No.
Rem. Original Amt.$
DEFER, r -o ExHts1T "C' ATTACHED
5AME
if more space needed attach description and refer to Exhibit "C"
rs at
per hour
Copy forwarded to City Treasurer and Applicant this day of
1g-.
less $20.00 fee
Approved by Resolution #
Total Due
Total Paid
—/—/
Property manager
Receipt #
The undersigned hereby accepts above terms and conditions and
certifies to the correctness herein, (Signature must be same as on
application).
SIGNED:
wner and/or ur o n ze igna ure
2
D�)
7-4 Worksheet
WEST COAST PAPER - BUILDING "N"
LID 330 SEGREGATION WORKSHEET
Assessment #
I
Segregations
since last payment
7-2
7-3
Net Usable Area (sf)
139,977
58,967
198,944 [3]
VDL Net Usable Area (sf)> 2,437,435
Less [3] 198,944
2,238,491 [4]
Balance`
459,472.30 /
97,468.80
114,840.67
$671,781.77 [1]
Amount
38,579.08
16,251.90
$54,830.98 [2]
$616,950.79 >Outstanding
>balance [1]-[2]
Outstanding balance/[4]> 0.275610128 [5]
7-4 Net Usable area (sf)> 128,400 [6]
7-4 Assessment [5] x [6]>
Page 1
$35,388.34
EXHIBIT "A"
LID 330 - Assessment Parcel #7
(Tax lot #142204-9007)
THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (SE 1/4
EK NG COUNTY, WASHINON 14, OGTON O
LYING WNSHIP 22 OSOUTH OF THE SOUTH LINE OF SRTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE OUTH MERIDIAN,8
NTH
STREET (TAYLOR ROAD);
EXCEPT THE NORTH 229 FEET OF THE EAST 224 FEET OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SAID
NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14;
EXCEPT THE EAST 30 FEET OF THE TOTAL TRACT DESCRIBED ABOVE CONVEYED TO
KING COUNTY FOR ROAD BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 602278;
EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO STATE OF WASHINGTON BY DEED RECORDED UNDER
RECORDING NO. 6515085;
EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF SAID TRACT CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF KENT BY DEED
RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 8808260233, 9005080831, 9005080832, RECORDS OF
KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON:
EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF LOT 4, BLOCK 1, VAN DOREN'S LANDING, ACCORDING TO
THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 158 OF PLATS, PAGES 71 THROUGH 75,
RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 4, THENCE SOUTH 00051'56"
WEST 164.98 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE THEREOF TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING;
THENCE SOUTH 89007'36" EAST 334.21 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00051'56" WEST 270.02 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 4;
THENCE NORTH 89007'36" WEST 284.22 FEET ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE
BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 50.00
FEET;
THENCE WESTERLY, NORTHWESTERLY AND NORTHERLY 78.53 FEET ALONG SAID
CURVE AND SOUTH LINE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 89059'32" TO SAID WEST
LINE OF LOT 4;
THENCE NORTH 00051'56" EAST 220.03 FEET ALONG SAID WEST LINE TO THE TRUE
POINT OF BEGINNING.
EXCEPT LOT 5, BLOCK 1, VAN DOREN'S LANDING, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF
RECORDED IN VOLUME 158 OF PLATS, PAGES 71 THROUGH 75, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY,
WASHINGTON;
TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF LOT 4 IN SAID BLOCK 1 DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 4, THENCE SOUTH 00051'56" WEST
164.98 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE THEREOF;
THENCE SOUTH 89°07'36" EAST 334. 21 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE SOUTH 00051'56" WEST 270.02 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 4;
THENCE SOUTH 89007'36" EAST 20.78 FEET ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE BEGINNING OF
A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTH HAVING A RADIUS OF 380.00 FEET;
THENCE EASTERLY 126.01 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE AND SOUTH LINE THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 19000'00" TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 4;
THENCE ALONG SAID EAST LINE THE FOLLOWING THREE COURSES:
THENCE NORTH 19052'24" EAST 93.88 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO
THE WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 300.44 FEET;
THENCE NORTHERLY 99.63 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
19°00'00";
THENCE NORTH 00052'24" EAST 97.87 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 1 IN SAID BLOCK 1;
THENCE NORTH 87015'04" WEST 191.57 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING;
ALSO TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF LOT 6, SAID BLOCK 1 DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 6, THENCE NORTH 89°07'36" WEST
186.49 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE THEREOF TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE SOUTH 0005224" EAST 84.18 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY PROLONGATION OF A
LINE RADIAL TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 6 WHICH BEARS NORTH 71006'52" EAST;
THENCE SOUTH 71006'52" WEST 92.00 FEET ALONG SAID PROLONGATION TO SAID
WESTERLY LINE AND THE BEGINNING OF A NON -TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE
SOUTHWESTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 380.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTHWESTERLY 133.58 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE AND WESTERLY LINE TO THE
NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 6;
THENCE SOUTH 89007'36" EAST 152.69 FEET ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE TRUE POINT
OF BEGINNING;
EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF SAID LOT 5 DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 5, THENCE NORTH 8900736" WEST
186.49 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE THEREOF;
THENCE NORTH 00052'24" EAST 39.80 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 89007'36" EAST 186.49 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 5;
THENCE SOUTH 00052'24" WEST 39.80 FEET ALONG SAID EAST LINE TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
EXCEPT THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS 3 AND 4, BLOCK 1, VAN DOREN'S LANDING, ACCORDING
TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 158 OF PLATS, S 71 THROUGH 75,
RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS A WHOLE AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 4, THENCE SOUTH 00051'56" WEST
164.98 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE THEREOF; THENCE SOUTH 89°07'36" EAST 334.21 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00052'24" EAST 229.99 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 89007'36" WEST 334.24 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 3;
THENCE SOUTH 00051'56" WEST 65.01 FEET ALONG LAST SAID WEST LINE TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON.
CONTAINING AN AREA OF 1,197,017SQUARE FEET (27.48ACRES) MORE OR LESS.
EXHIBIT "B"
LID 330 - Proposed Assessment Parcel #7-4
THAT PORTION OF LOT K OF CITY OF KENT LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 93-8,
RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 9408171008, LYING WITHIN THE NE
1/4 OF SECTION 14, T. 22 N., R. 4 E., W.M. IN KING COUNTY, WA.
The parcel described above contains a net usable area of 128,400 square feet (2.95 acres) more or
less.
SITUATE IN THE CITY OF KENT, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
EXHIBIT "C"
Remainder Description
THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (SE 1/4
NE 1/4) OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 22 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN,
IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING SOUTH OF THE SOUTH LINE OF SOUTH 228TH
STREET (TAYLOR ROAD);
EXCEPT THE NORTH 229 FEET OF THE EAST 224 FEET OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SAID
NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14;
EXCEPT THE EAST 30 FEET OF THE TOTAL TRACT DESCRIBED ABOVE CONVEYED TO
KING COUNTY FOR ROAD BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 602278;
EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO STATE OF WASHINGTON BY DEED RECORDED UNDER
RECORDING NO. 6515085;
EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF SAID TRACT CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF KENT BY DEED
RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 8808260233, 9005080831, 9005080832, RECORDS OF
KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON:
EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF LOT 4, BLOCK 1, VAN DOREN'S LANDING, ACCORDING TO
THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 158 OF PLATS, PAGES 71 THROUGH 75,
RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 4, THENCE SOUTH 00°51'56"
WEST 164.98 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE THEREOF TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING;
THENCE SOUTH 89°07'36" EAST 334.21 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00051'56" WEST 270.02 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 4;
THENCE NORTH 89007'36" WEST 284.22 FEET ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE
BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 50.00
FEET;
THENCE WESTERLY, NORTHWESTERLY AND NORTHERLY 78.53 FEET ALONG SAID
CURVE AND SOUTH LINE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 89059'32" TO SAID WEST
LINE OF LOT 4;
THENCE NORTH 00051'56" EAST 220.03 FEET ALONG SAID WEST LINE TO THE TRUE
POINT OF BEGINNING.
EXCEPT LOT 5, BLOCK 1, VAN DOREN'S LANDING, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF
RECORDED IN VOLUME 158 OF PLATS, PAGES 71 THROUGH 75, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY,
WASHINGTON;
TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF LOT 4 IN SAID BLOCK 1 DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 4, THENCE SOUTH 00051'56" WEST
164.98 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE THEREOF;
THENCE SOUTH 89007'36" EAST 334. 21 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE SOUTH 00051'56" WEST 270.02 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 4;
THENCE SOUTH 89007'36" EAST 20.78 FEET ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE BEGINNING OF
A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTH HAVING A RADIUS OF 380.00 FEET;
THENCE EASTERLY 126.01 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE AND SOUTH LINE THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 19000'00" TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 4;
THENCE ALONG SAID EAST LINE THE FOLLOWING THREE COURSES:
THENCE NORTH 19052'24" EAST 93.88 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO
THE WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 300.44 FEET;
THENCE NORTHERLY 99.63 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
19°00'00";
THENCE NORTH 00052'24" EAST 97.87 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 1 IN SAID BLOCK 1;
THENCE NORTH 87015'04" WEST 191.57 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING;
ALSO TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF LOT 6, SAID BLOCK 1 DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 6, THENCE NORTH 89007'36" WEST
186.49 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE THEREOF TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE SOUTH 00052'24" EAST 84.18 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY PROLONGATION OF A
LINE RADIAL TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 6 WHICH BEARS NORTH 71006'52" EAST;
THENCE SOUTH 71006'52" WEST 92.00 FEET ALONG SAID PROLONGATION TO SAID
WESTERLY LINE AND THE BEGINNING OF A NON -TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE
SOUTHWESTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 380.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTHWESTERLY 133.58 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE AND WESTERLY LINE TO THE
NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 6;
THENCE SOUTH 89007'36" EAST 152.69 FEET ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE TRUE POINT
OF BEGINNING;
EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF SAID LOT 5 DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 5, THENCE NORTH 89007'36" WEST
186.49 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE THEREOF;
THENCE NORTH 00052'24" EAST 39.80 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 89007'36" EAST 186.49 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 5;
THENCE SOUTH 00052'24" WEST 39.80 FEET ALONG SAID EAST LINE TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
EXCEPT THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS 3 AND 4, BLOCK 1, VAN DOREN'S LANDING, ACCORDING
TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 158 OF PLATS, PAGES 71 THROUGH 75,
RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS A WHOLE AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 4, THENCE SOUTH 00051'56" WEST
164.98 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE THEREOF; THENCE SOUTH 89007'36" EAST 334.21 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00052'24" EAST 229.99 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 89°07'36" WEST 334.24 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 3;
THENCE SOUTH 00051'56" WEST 65.01 FEET ALONG LAST SAID WEST LINE TO THE POINT OF ..
BEGINNING.
EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF LOT K OF CITY OF KENT LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 93-8,
RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 9408171008, LYING WITHIN THE NE
1/4 OF SECTION 14, T. 22 N., R. 4 E., W.M. IN KING COUNTY, WA.
SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON.
CONTAINING AN AREA OF 1,068,617 SQUARE FEET (24.53ACRES) MORE OR LESS.
LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT
I
LANDING
i I
�ol 2-10
�Wt
:
--------
r�
368.00'
S 89°07 36 E
2-6
AI �
nl
11Zi 2-4
I'
I � r• i
401
15' SIDEWALK SLOPE
111 B UTILITY EASEMENT 1
I
'.....L...............__..........._............_.............._..J.....
II I
'�--40' LANDSCAPE ESM'T.
I
1 2-3 I�
ly 1;
II I
Z
2-5
NO.RADIUS LENGTH DELTA
I 320.00 13.07' 02°2026"
2 50.00 78.55 90°00 28
NOTE :
IT IS THE INTENT OF THIS LOT LINE
ADJUSTMENT TO MERGE EXISTING
LOTS D, G , H 8 J INTO ONE LOT
(LOT K).
LEGEND
PLATTED LOT LINE
EXISTING LOT LINE PER
(LL. - 92 -5 , REC. NO.920520u881
CITY OF KENT
ADJUSTED LOT LINE
N
►I4 Sec, line
Ninos �,w
0 200 400
SCALE IN 200 T
2 -2
I- U -q3
VAN DOREN'S LANDING
PREPARED BY:
BUSH, ROED 8 HITCHINGS, INC.
CIVIL ENGINEERS a LAND SURVEYORS
SEATTLE. WASHMOMN 323-1144
JOB NO. 9232903 JAN , 1993
Kent City Council Meeting
Date October 4, 1994
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: MEADOW RIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PEDESTRIAN PATHWAY -
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Prior to the opening of the Meadow Ridge
Elementary School on 108th Ave., there was an issue relating to
pedestrian access to the school. As a condition of utility
service to the school, the City required the school to con-
struct a paved 5 foot wide asphalt shoulder along the east side
of 108th Ave from SE 264th to the school site, for which they
paid to the City approximately $71,000 to construct same. The
City proposed to widen the width to 8 feet due to safety con-
cerns expressed by the Tudor Square neighborhood however this
was not acceptable to the neighborhood representative. As
such, a revised alternative has been agreed upon wherein a path
would be constructed along 110th Avenue in addition to some
shoulder widening on 108th Avenue. Monies for this project
would be $71,000 (School District money) plus $19,880 City
sidewalk fund.>
ome s lde-r _ widening -on 30-&- -- Avenue -
3. EXHIBITS: Public Works minutes, Public Works Director
memorandum and vicinity map
4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (3-0 vote with Bennett
confirming by phone)
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES
C -V
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 3L
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
September 26, 1994
TO: Public Works Committee
FROM: Don Wickstromw
RE: Meadow Ridge Elementary School Pedestrian Pathway
As you are aware, prior to and with opening of the Meadow Ridge Elementary School,
there has been an issue relating to the pedestrian (kids) access to the school. As a
condition of utility service to the school, the City required the school to construct a paved-
5
aved5 foot wide asphalt shoulder along the east side of 108th Avenue from SE 264th St. to the
school site. In lieu thereof, the school paid (approximately $71,000) to the City to
construct same. Due to the concerns of the Tudor Square neighborhood about safety, the
City proposed to widen the width thereof to 8 feet for the bulk of the distance and 10 feet
from 274th southerly to the school. While this was presented in a meeting with the
neighborhood representative, it wasn't warmly accepted. As such, we offered to review
the matter for an alternative.
The attached maps denote the alternative we reviewed. Essentially it involves a path
system roughly along 110th Avenue or what would be 110th Avenue alignment plus doing
some limited gravel shoulder widening on 108th between 269th Street and 271 st Street.
This alternative pathway is estimated to cost $90,880 versus the $71,000 (based on a bid
plus emergency cost) for the widened 108th Avenue proposal. Monies for same would be
$71,000 (School District money) plus $19,880 City sidewalk fund. We will be meeting with
the Tudor Square representatives on Monday to get their opinion on this alternative.
This matter is before you to get Council direction as to which alternative to pursue. We
have a bid on the 108th Avenue proposal (bid tab attached) which due to the nature of the
material along 108th Avenue (clay sub -base) we will need to act on at next Council
meeting in order to meet the weather window to construct the project accordingly. It should
be noted that the 110th Avenue alignment alternative could involve condemnation action.
ACTION: Recommend either proceeding ahead with the 108th Avenue proposal or
proceeding ahead with 110th Avenue proposal.
NOTE: Neighborhood representative will probably be present.
PATHWAY
108T9 AVE. S.E.
BETWEEN S.E. 269TH ST.
AND S.E. 271 ST ST.
S.E. 272ND ST.
E: 269TH ST
450 L.F. STORM PIPE,
UNDER WALKWAY-), CCL L
C�5
PROPOSEDS WALKWAY--------
,T ST 2
71S -JE,
C�l
Li o
o
C:] S.E. 274TH ST.
MEADOW RIDGE
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
I -1] 1, F1,
D
ITEM I APPROX.
NO. QUAN'T'ITY
SOU Toms
4o H
450
i
✓liALh-wA✓ P,/' -J
UN I T TOTAL
TOTA
DESCRIPTION OF BID ITE" I p I c Ej AMOUNT
%Uloel�i ��T�oN
r C
���:�.
�RUSN2� r
.vo 'cv
..SCA^c^� IX:Av aT�o�l
--T-P,A rrlc �gnJTRp_ LABuR
//�� flc�OCATG MII$f 6l�q Nuc JS ri !'F=1C
fC<.n ovt U4 JJ ��Jl
��� �Vc.., UE IRou 1iPf
Iv pC
-�.e.:cT:ctiJ
;�G L
-7S.o�I
I5.oc�;�N
3oco.00
i5. 00
OQ
135�,�
g>✓,�� A
l lioa,OfD
-7S.o�I
N V
:! I
rAA
N"N
ALo,1) �OBTN AdE 5 C,
��3�SE� ON Com. PER
I �l Tc k ES
t 1
5I
"C-eD 440 L.F. 10 n(A. Cbuc. sTc;ct�n r"PE
REucA7S �{s L,t, pFrCl�
CKc-At/ATG �•-L tiEW DIT��r IO S.F. K S L.=. = JO
Zl
OF 3 -E -
DIA,
I sr,
Z
uEED; 3G0 c .F. la DIA, coNc, STORM r'IaE
27
t�ITCN To �No 0/W
,J, OF
t4
T
Z`
i
%S L. F. D(A, Co�1c, STa�M
CEnlSIN ' 6� O F7.
�iS�v�C �kc.{JaripN of
W W W
W W W
coo
CfZUSNEp SUR��c NG
000
N
+ ti'o
'(b ^r,
N N N
N��Nqq N
t�<
Aflo NeW ct3'�
i
o0
Use L._
PROPOSED WALI\_\VAI
TUD01' SQUARl"IV-) Nll,'.-\[)O\\,'
-J
EVSTINS
PAVEMENT
-4j' PAVED
�VALKVVAY
L
S.E.271 ST ST.
C3
` -EXIST. SIDEWALK
10' GRAVEL
WALKWAY
C6
LU
--T---
7
0
WE
MEADOW RIDGE
ELEM. SCHOOL
� ID G
, L-2
S.E. 274TH ST.
i41
10, KAN!�m
WALKWAY
=-,-3
,J],
CHIT TOTAL
ITEMAFFFO\. r£SCRIFTION OF flID ITEM F \ AuOUNT
II NO. QUANTITY
I
o ±4L
♦_,J Tech `r; �i �`���^�
,`,_
I
'� I `J
I x.41 :�`� .t`S�. l'Lv.> �li`•-�" I
I !� .`h J,:�\i
L.F�
...
`
1 "'�;.5,
I�'
IiM o✓� nc.ST _ cC ••r^��� IL-�rl�_L � f=i'^'� V. _�
/�
LC
`V
=j
ZZ.,
-C�-rcr1
o ±4L
N a
eva
Ci e4 Ci
N H n
TNI c�.)
y _ L
VOL. _ �70'�'`�'x�')%�X3')CI') = �'�� EF = Is
F�Z 1 n CC. S S D. / C..uq L K L-. C
z
i
i
i
Z (io')(
T � Z
-Z 2.
i -)00 « = 1q4(a, cF
For -P, .13gSE Forz f: o-,
A^-cje�A0
cF�
{ J�� rF : ip33cr=
;cT« bra SRA C..
� � II �U �'F � IC'I )� Cr '{. �/.�3? r C = .5�� 1 �,F � ( / ✓ CYC.
iJlj c.F
C
C N C Q
N N N
.c
\1 i
vLEAS J= r.— I
r
A-eh,�,,._� F
'z
rJ� JJ
l�
r ` YJ
fti
V
r
A-eh,�,,._� F
'z
rJ� JJ
l�
r ` YJ
fti
PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE
SEPTEMBER 269 1994
PRESENT: Paul Mann Roger Lubovich
Tim Clark Gary Gill
Don Wickstrom Tom Brubaker
Ed White Mrs Rust
ABSENT: Jim Bennett
Meadow Ridge Elementary School Pedestrian Pathway
Wickstrom stated that when the school was developed, the City conditioned that they
widen the shoulder on 108th from 264th to the school site and they have given us the
money to do that. He said the condition was to widen the shoulder 5 feet however we
were going to widen it to 8 feet. The residents of Tudor Square felt we should look at an
alternative which we did and that is the 110th Ave alignment. Wickstrom said the cost of
this alignment, plus widening between 271st and 269th along 108th (because there are
still some kids choosing to walk that way or off hours) is a total of about $90,000. He said
just to widen 108th was about $65,000; we have bids out and because of the clay material
there, we need to improve this during decent weather. Wickstrom said we met with the
residents of Tudor Square and they are in favor of the 110th alignment which, however,
may involve condemnation. He said we have an existing 15 foot paved maintenance road
to a sewer manhole on one of the lots in Tudor Square and to the south of that, which
abuts 271 st cul-de-sac there is an existing detention pond that we were going to run a trail
thru; south on 110th we would connect a private road with the existing 110th with a trail;
on 274th we have widened the south shoulder up to the English property, which we own,
and the kids could go thru the driveway to the back of the school. He said the school still
needs to make a decision on fencing their wetponds. He said this seems to be the most
favored route. Wickstrom again noted that there could be a possible condemnation with
this alternative. He said what the City is proposing regarding the 15 foot paved path is to
cutout 10 feet of asphalt, replace it with lawn, and install a parallel 6 foot wood fence. He
said we would then do our maintenance coming in from the south, thru our detention pond
area. Wickstrom said that the 110th route is the way the citizens want to go.
Wickstrom stated that in talking with Jim Bennett that Bennett favors the 110th alignment.
He also noted that the monies would come from the sidewalk fund.
Dean Radford, a resident of 27010 111th PI S.E., stated that the neighbors were
concerned that the School District would want to resume bussing their children once that
pathway is finished along 108th. Wickstrom stated that under the terms of the mitigation
the School District paid for, they said they would bus children to the school until the
NO
improvements along 108th were made. Radford made reference to a contract and
Wickstrom noted that this refers to the City asking the School District to amend the
obligation so that we could use their money to build parts of this path, plus using our own
money. He said that the intent is that we would build it all at once including the piece on
108th; the path on 110th would be opened at the same time the shoulder widening is done
on 108th and at that point the bussing would end. Wickstrom said the only delay could
occur during condemnation which could take up to six months. In response to Brubaker,
Wickstrom stated that during the time of condemnation; as long as the improvements are
not built, the bussing will continue. Radford requested that this bussing situation be put
in writing. Lubovich suggested that a letter of understanding be prepared with both
parties signing.
Committee unanimously agreed that contingent upon the letter of understanding being
written by Public Works to the School District, authorize the construction of 110th walkway
for Meadow Ridge Elementary.
Street Use Ordinance
Lubovich stated that the Mayor is concerned about the structures we have had in the city
where buildings get moved in and situated on lots without being permanently placed. He
said that the conditioning of moving a house thru the City requires a street use permit, and
Lubovich recommended conditioning that permit issuance upon obtaining a building permit
for siting the building before it is moved. Lubovich stated that in talking with Jim Bennett,
Bennett had some concerns about this in that he felt we may be over -regulating.
Committee unanimously recommended approval of the suggested changes to the Street
Use Ordinance.
Opticom System
Wickstrom explained that Opticom is what gives preemption status to our fire vehicles on
emergency responses and it works off a strobe light system and what we presently have
is very antiquated. We have been having problems with the system over the years and
now we have an opportunity to get a trade-in as a promotional deal with 3M Company,
which would save the City about $75,000. He said since this needs to be done, we should
do it now instead of waiting thru the'95 budget cycle. He said, if we wait the trade-in deal
won't be there and it will cost us more money. He said we have some money in completed
street projects that we want to reallocate to do this. Clark asked, if the current system is
triggered by other types of vehicles; is there any guarantee that the new system will not
be volatile to that? White explained that it will go to a protection system and the strobe will
only pick up certain patterns.
Committee unanimously recommended implementing the project and establishing the fund
as explained. Bennett concurred with this recommendation by phone, with Wickstrom.
Kent City Council Meeting
Date October 4, 1994
Category Consent Calendar
J� 1. SUBJECT: EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM - CONTRACT
2. SUMMARY STATEMEN The- Hurna-n-
44+quthorization to enter into a contract with Maschhoff Barr
and Associates to provide an Employee Assistanc Program foNJ
City employees and their families .ao ./- xhE�
,C%Gl�C.00 H»
3. EXHIBITS: Memorandum to Mayor and Councilmembers and copy of
proposal from Maschhoff Barr and Associates
4. RECOMMENDED BY: Operations Committee on 9/28/94
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $11,000
SOURCE OF FUNDS: Health Insurance Fund
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
seconds
Council Agenda
Item No. 3M
HUMAN RESOURCES DIVISION
DATE: October 3, 1994
TO: Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Sue Viseth, Human Resources Director
SUBJECT: EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
The Human Resources Division has been working with the Employee Health Care Task Force in
an effort to select an Employee Assistance Program (EAP) provider for City employees and their
families.
The selection process included preparation of an RFP; proposal review and scoring; interviews
with the finalists; and extensive reference checking. The unanimous decision of the Task Force
was to award the contract to Maschhoff Barr and Associates (MBA).
MBA is a local firm with over 15 years of experience. They have extensive experience providing
EAP services to municipalities. In addition to drug, alcohol and mental health counseling, MBA
provides on site training for managers and supervisors and orientation sessions for employeesi
Suiveys have shown that an effective EAP can reduce healthcare costs, absenteeism and
attrition. As a confidential resource located outside the workplace, the EAP gives employees and
family members the opportunity to discuss their concerns confidentially with therapists who are
specially trained to help identify both the underlying problems and possible solutions. The EAP
assesses the clients situation, works with the client to develop a treatment plan, and helps the
client to implement that treatment plan.
The cost of providing Maschhoff Barr's Employee Assistance Program will be approximately
$11,000 per year. These dollars have been budgeted through the health fund and therefore a
budget adjustment is not required.
At this time I would like to request your authorization enter into a contract with Maschhoff Barr
for EAP services. Please feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions regarding this
request. I can be reached at 859-3358.
cc: Brent McFall, Director of Operations
Employee
Assistance
Program
for
The City of Kent
Maschhoff, Bat)• O Associates
A Subsidiary of Greenspring Health Services, Inc.
This document includes responses to the City oflCent
Request for Proposal questionnaire. For more
information please contact Chris Parsons at the MBeT'A
Marketing Department 800 441-3119.
Employee Assistance Program (EAP)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Backg7-ound.............................................................. 1
Corporate Mission Statement .......................................... 1
Corporate Philosophy Statement ..................................... 1
Experience........................................................................ 1
Assessment and Referral ............................................. 5
Problems Addressed ................................................... 7
MB&A Responds to Current Issues ................................. 7
Drug and Alcohol Testing ......................................... 8
Counseling Network..................................................10
Therapist Qualifications.................................................. 11
Accessibility............................................................... 1_
Aliati617s................................................................ 12
Reporting................................................................. 12
Confidentialit�.......................................................... 13
Cost.......................................................................... 1�
Critical Incident Stress Debriefing ................................... 15
ElderCar.......................................................................... 16
Resources for Compulsive Gambling ............................... 16
Relocation Counseling..................................................... 16
Legal Consultation Seri -ice ............................................... 16
RatelUtilization Guarantees......................................17
Training...................................................................
17
Orientatioll...............................................................
18
Manager Training
18
............................................................
Other Available Training .................................................
20
Consultations............................................................
20
References................................................................ 22
The City of Kent - RFP Response Index
Employee Assistance Program (EAP)
Background
Please describe your company mission and philosophy? How long has
Your EAP been in business? How many full-time employees do you
employ?
Maschhoff, Barr & Associates, Inc. (h7B&A), is a
WashinE!ton"T%e counselor' state corporation providing employee
tins ver y good I assistance program and related services nationwide.
would At NIB&A, we take great pride in our commitment to quality
recomrrtertd these in both product and service. We are noted across the country
services to for our attentiveness to client needs, and for our emphasis on
rtnyorte. " delivering quality, cost-effective services.
Corporate Mission Statement
Maschhoff, Barr & Associates, Inc., is dedicated to providing
i,igh quality Employee Assistance Programs and Managed
Behavioral Health Care Services that emphasize respect and
dignity for the individual, and cost-effective programs for the
groups we serve.
Corporate Philosophy Statement
AIB&A has a history of success. lige do not take that success
for granted. We understand that continuous change,
continuous evolution of our products and quality in service
delivery is critical to our future. We are committed to
listening to our clients and our employees. We measure our
success through their eyes.
Experience
Maschhoff, Barr and Associates (MB&A) has been providing
counseling services for fifteen years. Our founders, Tom
Maschhoff and Bill Barr, recognized that the future success of
The City of Tient - RFP Response Pa; e I
"t was jztst what
needed to phzzz
1' Changes*177 771
life, since ng
Spouse is
ernzinally ill. "
Employee Assistance Program (EAP)
organizations was dependent on the effective management of
healthy employees. In response, MB&A was started to assist
organizations in providing resources for their employees to
use in solving their personal concerns and to provide
managers with skiIIs to assist them in managing employees
Supporting supervisors and helping employees with their
personal problems before they become «orkplace issues is the
cornerstone upon which MB&A has built its nationwide
reputation for quality EAP services.
MB&A appreciates the opportunity to provide Employee
Assistance Program (EAP) sen ices to the City of Kent. As
the current provider of EAP sl-Mces to numerous cities
nationwide, It has been our experience that city employees
experience unique stresses which affect job performance and
the overall quality of life. These problems include:
• Downsizin,
• Problem patrons
•
Job isolation
• Routine tasks
• LonQ work hours
• Pressure to
always be
pleasant
• Workplace
violence
Shortages of
staff
• Annual increases
in work pressure
• Public scrutiny
• Relocation
• High turnover
• Internal
reorganization
A reference list of cities with regulations, health plans,
operating procedures and structures similar to the City of
Kent. can be found at the end of this proposal.
In addition to cities, MB&A provides services to
organizations ranging size from small family businesses to
multi -national Fortune 500 conglomerates. The following pie
chart illustrates some of the diverse industries MB&A serves.
The City of Tient - RFP Response pare
"I a712 glad 11071
a7 -e available. "
Employee Assistance Program (LAF)
uovernmen
:W
Percentage of MB&A Business
Health Care High Tech Schools
Other 6,0 109• 6,p
Service
1691.
Transportation
4%
Manu!acturing
2091.
Experience in serving both city and commercial accounts has
allowed MB&A to develop and refine a model of service
which has set the standard for EAPs nationwide. This model
includes systems for:
• Evaluation
• Development of a treatment plan
• Assistance in the selection of treatment therapists
and complete structured referral
• Monitoring of the employee's compliance to
treatment plans
• Maintenance of records and reporting
• Provision of additional educational programs
• Close cooperation and consultation with
supervisors and managers
These services are Guided by our Standards, Procedures and
Protocols manual which includes written documentation
representing our continual conunitment to high quality and
clinically appropriate professional services nationwide.
Our understanding and ability to service the City of Kent is
perhaps best expressed by the comments we have received
from satisfied city employees over the past three months. The
The City of Kent - RFP Response Page 3
"I thinfz this is 2
w072 Tzrl service
and ZVOZfld
reconznzend to
rzn1,0zze.
Employee Assistance Program (EAP)
review committee will find these continents listed throughout
this proposal. y
MB&A's experience in providing EAP services to numerous
commercial combined with our extensive experience in
providing EAP services to other cities gives ?NiB&A several
distinct advantages over other vendors.
• We understand City of Kent' desire to offer an EAP to
assist employees whose job performance, attendance or
behavior is being affected by personal problems.
We are aware of personnel policies, disciplinary
actions, equal employment opportunity issues, and
understand mann, of the unique needs of City of Kent
families.
• NVe have an extensive therapist network to serve the
City of Kent. NVe can accommodate employees in each
Iocation without incon%-eniencinQ the employee or their
manager.
• MB&A's knowled-ac of health benefit plans for city
employees is extensive. MB &A is the exclusive EAP
providing services to over 15 Blue Cross Blue Shield
Plans throunhout the United States. This knmvledRe of
insurance plans, health maintenance organizations will
be of value to City of Kent employee families.
We recognize that the goal of an EAP to provide a
diagnostic assessment and referral for clinical
treatment or rehabilitation services. We are
knowledgeable and experienced in assisting City of
Kent families in using their health benefits package
appropriately.
Maschhoff, Barr and Associates looks forward to utilizing our
skills, expertise and experience to provide a highly sensitive,
confidential and cost effective EAP to the City of Kent. We
believe that our proposal represents the best value available to
The City of Kent - RFP Response Paf�e 4
n
Employee Assistance Program (EAP)
the City of Kent and that NIB&A, more than anyone else,
understands the dynamic, and complex mission of the City of
Kent.
ASSeSS71ZC11t and Referral
"I a77z vele
satisfied at how I
a77z feeli77g these
days. Alth07tah
77zy feat's havelz Y
left 71ze, I a777
dealilzg with
myself Gette7•.
Rachel is the
most zv07zde7fztl
W077za7z !
How does the assessmentprocess ix,ork9
A single call to our toll free telephone number puts employees
in touch with our EAP services. A dedicated toll free TDD
!in-- Rives access for the deaf and hearing-impaired. Our
services are available 21 -hours a day. 7 days a week.
.access to our E is simple and straightforward. From the
first phone contact, clients receive p--rsonalized.
compassionate service. Our professionally trained staff match
callers with assessment therapists who meet the caller's needs
for geographic location and expertise based on the presenting
problem.
Crisis tails to the help line during normal business hours are
first received by client service representatives who are trained
to recognize levels of urgency and to transfer the calls
immediately to a -Tasters or Doctorate 1 --vel project manager
.ti ho is available on-site. Calls received through the help line
outside of normal business hours are answered by our medical
answering service and routed directly to a project manager.
The project manager speaks to the caller and evaluates the
clinical urgency of intervention and makes an appropriate
referral. Project managers receive extensive training in how to
engage suicidal and/or violent patients in order to quickly
assess the level of danger and pathology, to empathetically
engage the patient, and then to help the patient enter the
treatment system. If the caller is judged to be in a crisis or is
suicidal or homicidal, we notify emergency services to
intervene.
The Cit>> of Kent - RFP Response Paee 5
"I was under
S e 21 e7'e
St7-ess/dep7-essio7z
-- ulzable to
irl7ct1o7z at work,
fel11'ed 10S1176C 777j'
coulzselin�
t177-0110-13 E4P
777ade it possible
J
01' 71ze to pull
through.
Tha7zks!"
Employee Assistance Program (ERP)
Our standard for appointments through the network is sarne
day for emergencies, and wlLhin 24 to 4S hours for urgent
care. In an emergency situation, an appointment will be set
within 24 hours for the individual to come in for a face-to-
face assessment and --valuation with one of our therapists.
This flow chart outlines a typical non -emergency EAP
assessment:
Employee or family
member calls MS&A toll
free number to request
assistance/assessment
Company
representative refers
employee to MB&A toll
free number
M'D&A Client Service
Representative matches
individual need with an
assessment provice-
Assessment therapist completes
an in-person assessment and
makes recommendations for
cnaoing care, if needed
Approximately 40% find
problem resolution or do
not desire a referral for
ongoing care.
Approximately -0090 desire
continued care. Benefits may
or may not be applicable to
the presenting problem.
Assessment therapist
recommends options for
cost-effective community
resources.
MB&A surveys the individual to
determine the level of satisfaction with
MB&A services.
The City ({f Bent - RFP Acsponse Pabe 6
Employee Assistance Program (EAP)
Problems Addressed
What kinds of issues are addressed by your EAP?
The EAP addresses a wide range of concerns. They include:
❑ Family relationships
❑
Marital difficulties
❑
Child/Parenting
❑
problems
❑
Adolescent issues
❑
Elder care
❑
Drug abuse
❑
Alcohol abuse
❑
Prescription abuse
❑
Sleep problems
❑
Depression
❑
Anxiety
❑
Loneliness
❑
Eating disorders
Compulsive gambling
JIB& A Responds to Current Issues
❑
Mental health
problems
❑
Career concerns
❑
Workplace problei
❑
Critical incidents
❑
Financial problem:
❑
Literacy
Today's hectic and ever-changing way of living generates
problems that sometimes require specific attention.
Over the past few years MBB: A has increased its awareness
of and ability to respond to special problems such as:
• Workplace violence
• Relocation counseling
• Domestic violence
• Single parenting
• Gambling
• Eating disorders
• Substance abuse
• Literacy
• Elder care
• Financial and debt
The City of Kent - RFP Response Pave 7
Employee Assistance Program (EAP)
Drub and _ lcohol Testirt�
In 1995 the City of Kerrt must comply )with the Department of
Transportarion Drug &- Alcohol testing requirements. 11 -hat service does
Your company have that can assist us ivit these new requirements?
MB&A has supported mane cities 'In 'Implementing Drug Free
Workplace Programs and can assist the City of Kent in this
process.
MB&. -\'s can support the city of Kent in their transition to
DOT _uidelines by:
• Helping establish Return to «'ork agreements;
• bstance abuse testing:
Supporting su
• yssisting in applying city policies and procedures in a
consistent manner:
• Helping create a work environment that supports the
employee's reintegration to the job after successfully
meeting the terms of a Return to W'ork agreement.
An in;oortant part of recovery from alcohol addiction or
chemical dependency is accountability. 1v1B&A's mandatory
referral process helps to keep individuals accountable for their
recoven, and continued sobriety or drug free lifestyle.
The mandatory referral process, outlined below, offers a more
str-ictured approach which includes a written release of
information from the employee so that the Agency can be
notified regarding compliance with recommendations (next
page)
P
The City of hent - RFI' Response Page S
p7"onided 1116
lith 171j07.772 LtZo71
1772d exercises to
pork throlruh the
Strl117Z CZIZd
a71xirty I zeas
:vpe17611C111J. He
helped 71710
'evelop healthi61"
patte77zs for
derali77g zzuth
7i-ITICult people. "
Employee Assistance Programs (EAP)
Supervisor calls MB&.A =AP toll free
number for supervisor consultation.
Employee signs "Release of
Information" consent form and "Return to
Work Agreement" with their supervisor
MB&A chooses an assessment
therapist based on presenting problem,
geographic location and special needs.
A face-to-face assessment appointment
is schedu'ed (usually vJthin 24 hours)
for employee
Assessment visits are completed and
recommendations are made for ongoing
care, if any
Assessment the. calls MB&A to
review findings and rferral options.
PLEB&A project manager
monitors compliance/noncompliance until
treatment is completed and reports this
to the designated contact person.
Employee violates Return to Work
agreement and company disciplinary
process continues.
Support of employee and
supervisor in reintegration
into work environment
MB&A's Mandatory Referral Process
The coal is to create a supportive relationship with the City of
Kent and its employees who are struggling with chemical
dependency issues.
The City (,f Kett - RFP Response Page 9
Employee Assistance Program (EAP)
Educational programming is also called for under the DOT
requirements. The supervisor training will begin to meet some
of those needs. In addition. the EAP can assist in the
development of written materials to support Drug Free-
Workplace
reeWorkplace efforts.
Counseling Nehvork
Does your clinical staff have Tasters degrees and/or are they certlJced in
their specialties? Ho)t, are clinicians screened?
The quality of the therapist network is critical to meeting the
needs of the organizations, employees and families we serve.
For this reason, we have developed therapist selection
guidelines that establish standards of quality, accessibility,
and cost-effectiveness. Thesa guidelines include quality
criteria to ensure that therapists are appropriately licensed and
conform to commonly accepted practice patterns. Therapists
are regularly monitored and each assessment form MB&A
receives is revicwed before payment is made to the therapist.
Our network includes:
• Psychiatrists
• Clinical psychologists
• Nurse practitioners
• Social workers
• Mental health counselors
• Marriage and family counselors
• Substance abuse counselors
Before including any therapist in its network, MB&A's
Professional Therapist Review Team conducts a complete
credentials review to evaluate each prospective therapist's
area of specialty, philosophy, availability, and accessibility.
The number, location, and specialties of MB&A therapists are
determined by the demographic and geographic distribution
of City of Kent employees. MB&A guarantees employees
The City of hent - RFP Response Page 10
Employee Assistance Program (ERP)
will not have to travel more than ?0 n__ ores to access a
therapist.
Therapist Qualifications
Criteria pertaining to all professionals:
• Must hold a current unrestricted license in their
specialty in O11aha,=a. L-:-- x,�-
• Must carry malpractice insurance coverage of
$1,000.000 per incident and S3.000,000 per
aggregate
• Letters of reference from a hospital with which the
therapist is associated or fro.:: peers.
• A 5 year malpractice history _Aust be submitted.
• Membership in a national precessional association
which ascribes to professional code of ethics
preferred (such as American ?svchiatric
Association, American Psvc:-.ological Association.
National Association of Social Workers).
MB&A verifies credentials of therapists who meet the
selection criteria and pass the appiication process. We access
state and national data bases for verifica_ion. Credentials and
training must be verifiable and appropriate for the therapist's
area of specialty. Substance abuse treat-,ent therapists must
be qualified (QCDC) or certified (CCDC), or equivalent, in
addiction treatment. All therapists must meet applicable state
requirements for licensure and practice. Psychiatrists may be
board eligible or certified.
MB&A reviews applications from therapists, and notifies
therapists not meeting guidelines that they cannot participate
in our network. At that time, therapists are informed of the
appeal process they can use for reconsideration of inclusion in
the network.
MB&A verifies network therapist credentials according to
specific requirements developed for each type of therapist.
We investigate therapists whose credentials cannot be verified
The CitY of Kent - RFP Response Page 11
Employee Assistance Program (EAP)
to confirm non-compliance. If, after in%estigation, credentials
remain unverified, we drop the therapists from the net« ork
immediately. The therapist's notification of Nvithdra%val will
include information of the appeal process.
MB&A recredentials therapists eves -y Iwo years.
Accessibilio,
Please provide the number of therapists xvithirt 30 miles of the Kent city
carter.
MB&A currently has 246 within thirzv miles of the Kent city
center. Listed in the Appendix is a scatter ;,lap \N hich gives a
graphic depiction of our Washington pro%,ider network.
Affiliations
Do You have any affiliations x•ith treatment facilities?
MB&A has NO relationships With treatment providers, and
receives NO remuneration for treatment referrals. Whenever
clinically appropriate, network therapists refer clients to
treatment providers whose services are co%,ered through the
clients health plan or to low cost community resources.
Reporting;
Please describe any reports provided to the City of Kent. IVIiat methods
are usedfor program evaluation?
To help the City of Kent assess the use and value of its EAP, we
provide regular company utilization reports. These reports provide
an activity summary that includes:
• Number of assessments
• Demographic data
• Problems addressed
Supervisor Consultations
The City of Kent - RFP Response Page 12
Employee Assistance Program (EAP)
Tile City of Kent would receive a computer generated
statistical sunuuary of the City of Kent's EAP utilization
quarterly. A sample of this report is included in the Appendix.
IMB&A feels strongly that the role of the EAP is to assist
people in finding resources for resolution to their presenting
concerns and problems. MB&A realizes that each condition
has a separate treatment modality and eapectcd length of care.
The role of the NIB&A EAP is to identify the problem,
develop a treatment plan and assist the employee in
implementing that plan.
� ith permission from the employee, follow up activities will
occur with each new case. Follow up occurs directly with the
employee With a focus on supporting follow-up
recommendations and employee perception of the adequacy
on ongoing services. All follow up activities are documented
III « riting and become a part of the case file "
If problems reoccur or new problems surface, individuals and
fami]y members will be encouraged to return to the EAP for
additional services. We realize. that individuals may well
experience more than one problem a year and %would routinely
return for a new assessment services.
Confidentiality
Please discuss your policy regarding confzdeiztiality.
We believe confidentiality is critical to the success of any
Employee Assistance Program; employees of the City of Kent
must trust our organization and our network structure to feel
comfortable in using our services.
NIB&A is knowledgeable about the laws regarding
confidentiality and are committed to protecting confidentiality
while offering an opportunity for the release of information
when such a release is appropriate.
The City of hent - RFP Response
Page 13
Employee Assistance Program (EAP)
MB&A believes that confidentiality is a cornerstone to the
success of any EAP. Should confidentialin be broken the
word quickly spreads throughout the employee population
and their family members that the EAP can not be trusted.
MB&A is well-acquainted with the Privacy Act of 1974 and
the public laws concerning confidentiality and reporting [PL
c" -'M and PL 9;-579 and -!?CFR ?.1 1(n)1.
MB&A also realizes that there are certain tinges when Public
Lary mandates that confidentiality be broken. This is true only
at times of potential homicide, suicide, child abuse and other
related areas where there is danger to the employee, the
fa:1ily, or other individuals. in addition to the noted areas,
court orders and subpoenas would be the only other instance
��here information would be disclosed «ithout a signed
consent. `
.mil record keeping is completed in accordance with the
Privacy Act of 197.1 and other related public law. As the
employee or family member contacts MB&A, a record is
established with a case number, presentingproblem and
therapist's notes. These records are utilized for evaluation.
Gathering statistics, and referral for ongoing treatment. All of
these records remain the property of N1B&A with the
exception of those areas defined in Public Law.
From time to time, employees ask that information be shared
with their employer or supervisor. At these times, a release
would be obtained and the specific information which was to
be shared would be outlined on the release of information.
Again, we would like to assure the reviewers that our firm is
Lyell acquainted with confidentiality and reporting
requirements. No names will be utilized in making reports
back to the City of Kent. All written evaluations forms from
employees are anonymous. At no time will the names of
individuals who utilize the EAP be reported back to the Citv
The Cily of hent - RFPRcspon.cc
' Page 14
Cost
Employee Assistance Program (EAP)
of Kent without direct written consent from the employee to
do so.
Mi at is the cost of the program? Are there any optional programs? If so,
please list and proride costs.
The cost to cover Cite of Kent employees with the MB&A
EAP Nvould be a maximum S1.74 per employee per month for
a three visit model and S2.49 per employee per month for a
six visit model (see the Rare%Uiili_-arion Guarantee question
for more details).
This price is inclusive of all services listed in this proposal
except the LawPhonc 1 --cal consultation service (see
description below).
Critical Incident Stress Debr-iefin,(,Y
11,e7y pleased
with p7.0777PM SS
a71d the
professionals that
a) -e part of the
EAP! I aM better
lzow tha7z I've
bee7z in Heals!"
Price: Included
NN'hen employees' lives are changed by a traumatic incident,
the workplace and those in it cannot avoid beim affected.
MB&A uses a well -tested critical incident debriefing model
%which has proven effective in numerous traumatic situations.
Critical incident stress debriefing is a caring way to assist
people in moving through trauma and grief so that healing can
begin. When a CISD is requested, an EAP project manager
initiates services through qualified therapists, coordinates the
process, and monitors the outcome. Our internal Emergency
Response Team responds immediately to coordinate resources
and activities in crisis situations. Those experiencing stress
from a traumatic incident may also call the EAP for
individual appointments.
The City of Dent - RFP Response Page 15
Employee Assistance Program (EAP)
Elder Care Price: Included
Many families are responsible for caring for older adults.
MB&A connects people with elder care resources and
consultation services across the country. Focused assistance is
available for those who have specific concerns about older
adults. This service also handles `eneral questions about elder
care.
Resources for Compulsive Gambling Price: Included
As more states ]eRalize lotteries, card rooms, pull tabs, and
other Qamblina, we have seen an increase in the need for
resources to address these issues. MB&A is prepared to assist
those ,vho struggle with compulsi� -- or inappropriate
Rambling.
Relocation Counseling
Price: Included
Although relocation offers an employee and their family
many positive opportunities. the process itself can be eery
stressful. The EAP offers assistance in preparing for
relocation, and after relocation individuals and families can
also call on the EAP for help in adjusting to new
surroundings, jobs and situations.
Legal Consultation Service Price: I5¢pepm
The LawPhone legal consultation provides toll free telephone
consultations for employees with experienced private
attorneys within the local area.
99D When leLyal needs arise, employees simply call MB&A as
they would for any other problem. Our staff then provide the
necessary access information.
The City of hent - RFP ResponsePave 16
Employee Assistance Program (EAP)
Emergency consultations are available 24 hours a day, 7 days
a week, giving employees access to an attorney by telephone
any time a legal problem arises. Non -emergency telephone
consultations are typically scheduled within 24 hours.
Attorneys are available to provide assistance for a wide range
of common legal problems. All attorneys carry Errors and
Omissions coverage, and are certified by the Bar Association
in the state(s) in which they practice.
This service is intended to provide basic legal advice.
Attorneys who participate in the Legal Consult Line service
may not self -refer; for complex legal issues, employees are
encouraged to contact the local bar association.
RatelUtilizatiott GIIaM77tees
Please describe any rate or utilization guarantees.
Our experience in ser% ing nearly one million lives nationwide-
has
ationwidehas gig°en us the ability to guarantee the City of Kent a 517o
utilization rate. For every 1% below the target Jci'o rate,
MB&A will refund the City of Kent Sc per employee per
month at the end of the contract year.
MB&A guarantees that rates will not increase more than 7%
per year.
Training
What supervisorhnanagement training does your plan provide?
Qualified regional trainers deliver annual training services
and materials on-site for your supervisors. MB&A will
provide training for any Agency that has twenty confirmed
attendees.
Supervisor training helps familiarize your managers and
supervisors with your EAP services. We prefer to schedule
The City of hent - RFP Response Pape 17
Employee Assistance Program (EAP)
supervisor training before employee sessions to ensure your
supervisors are comfortable with our program and procedures
and are capable of answering questions from their staff after
the overall EAP training.
Supervisor training sessions are typically two hours long.
They corer: 2
• Overvie-,v of the EAP's services, procedures, and
requirements,
• Supervisor support for employees to use the EAP;
• Helping supervisors recognize performance problems
"He 1pfzrl, and appropriately assist the troubled employee;
S?iCCZ11Ct. ZgI7t EAP referral options related to com an o--
(se services i?Z the procedures; P } p_icies and
future. " Supervisor manual for use durin« training and for
future reference; and
Mandatory referral process.
Sessions also allow supervisors to discuss and clarify any
concerns.
Orientation
How do i'ou provide orientation to employees on yourplan?
Maschhoff, Barr & Associates believes that you get the most
for your EAP dollar when your employees make full use of
the EAP services you've purchased. MB&A's employee and
supervisor training are designed to create an understanding of
the availability of, and access to, EAP services.
Manager Training
Employee orientation provides an overview of program
elements that pertain to employees. We find that employees
are far more willing to contact the EAP if they understand
how it works and what assistance they can receive.
The City of Tient - RFP Response
Pa; e I8
Employee Assistance Program (EAP)
A typical employee training session is 30 minutes long and
follows this course content:
Introductory Remarks and Program Overview
• Introduction by appropriate organization
representative
• Definition of the EAP
• Typical problems confronting today's employees
• Services provided by the EAP and who can access
them
Program Access
• How to access the EAP
• 24 hour telephone lines
• Confidentiality
Encouraging Program Utilization
• Reinforcing confidentiality
• No cost for services
• Review of telephone numbers
Questions and Answers
Upon completion of employee training, employees should
understand:
• The definition of the EAP
• The definition of an EAP assessment
• The variety of concerns for which employees can
access the EAP
• How the program works for employees and their
families
• The importance MB&A places on confidentiality
We recommend that the City of Kent require attendance to
assure that all employees receive complete information about
their EAP services.
In addition, the MB&A training video will be provided to the
City of Kent as a supplemental training aid. This
The City of Tient - RFP Response Page 19
Employee Assistance Program (EAP)
professionally produced videotape provides an overview and
introduction to EAP services.
Other Available Training
.NIB&A also has available wellness education programs which
offer employees the kno%vledge and skills they need to
successfully self -manage basic health concerns. Those who
are well informed are better able to take control of their lives,
to engage in behaviors and activities that support and promote
good health and well-being.
Through our network of professional trainers, I\IB&A can
arovide work -shops and informational presentations within
They were
these general subject areas:
prompt and
professional. Stress
Thank 1lo7,t. " Balancing Work and Home
• Drug Free Workplace
• Small Group Communication
• Emotional Issues of Retirement
Consultations
Do you provide consultations to emplo-yees and supen-isors?
Job performance issues often stem from an employee's
personal or emotional problems. When this occurs, MB&A's
Supervisor Consultation service can provide assistance for
supervisors %with:
• Identifying and approaching the troubled employee
• Applying company policies and procedures
• Creating a supportive work environment
When a supervisor contacts the EAP for consultation, the
designated MB&A project manager responds immediately.
The project manager works with the supervisor to evaluate
The City of hent - RFP Response
Pab c 20
Employee Assistance Program (EAP)
the situation and develop the best plan of action to support the
troubled employee.
The EAP Supervisor Consultation is designed to support the
resources of the City of Kent's existing Personnel or Human
Resources Department. The EAP offers assistance to
supervisors and managers in dealing with employees whose
problems are affecting their job performance and the
performance and productivity of other employees.
The City of Kent - RFP Response Page 21
Employee Assistance Program (EAP)
References
Please list other cities you provide EAP services to.
The following are some of the
cities that receive EAP services
from MB&A. Selected letters of recommendation are
included in the Appendix.
P.O. Box 609
Cite of Seattle
Centralia, WA 98531
Claudia Gross
Cite of Grand Forks
710 Second Ave. 12TH
Jay Grayba
Dexter Horton Bldg.
=04 2nd Ave. No.
Seattle, NVA 95104-1793
Grand Forks, ND 58201
(206) 6S4 -7S32
(701) 750-5180
Number of employees: 7825
Number of employees: 350
City of Tacoma Cite of Hoquiam
Dwight Faust :Maureen Smedley
747 Market Street 609 Eieth St.
Tacoma, WA 98=102-3764 Hoquiam, WA 98550
(206) 59 1 -5435 (206) 532-9330
Number of employees: 2920 lumber of employees: 114
J City of Auburn City of Port Angeles
Leonard Sims 7-aj') a s Robert Coons
25 West Main P.O. Box 1150
Auburn, WA Port Angeles, WA 98362
(206)931-3040 (206)457-0411
Number of employees: 350 Number of employees: 217
City of Centralia
City of Port Townsend
Sacia Graber
David Grove
P.O. Box 609
540 Water St.
Centralia, WA 98531
Port Townsend, WA 98368
(206) 736-4992
Number of employees: 67
Number of employees: 154
The City of hent - RFP Response Page 22
Employee Assistance Program (EAP)
City of Puyallup
Bruce Uhl
218 `Fest Pioneer
Puyallup, SVA 98371
(206) 841-5470
Number of employees
The City of Kent - RFP Response
City of Richland
Anna Bullock
P.O. Box 190
Richland, SVA 99352
(509)943-7396
97 Number of employees: 397
Start date: 1/15/92
Pane 23
3
Kent City Council Meeting
Date October 4, 1994
Category Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: LID 344 - INSTALLMENT
Committe
to provide a 10 -year in t no
from the LID Guaranty Fund, an Authorizati
approve ordinance No. 3190 and ave a
LID installment note for $66,097.12/ "r-
INANCE
pproval a�
e to fund LID 344
to
or sign the 10 -year
EXHIBITS: Memo from May Miller, letter from Foster Pepper and
Shefelman, ordinance and Installment Note
4. RECOMMENDED BY: Operations Committee (3-0)
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES X
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $66,097.12
SOURCE OF FUNDS: LID Guaranty Fund
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 3N
MILLER,MAYENE / KENT70/FN - HPDesk print.
-----------------------------------------
Su`'=Ct: LID 344 - INSTALLMENT NOTE & ORDINANCE
CrW_..,cor: Mayene MILLER / KENT70/FN Dated: 09/20/94 at 2033.
IN PST EFFORT TO SAVE TAXPAYER DOLLARS, BOND COUNSEL- FOSTER PEPPER AND
SHEFELMAN, HAVE ASSISTED IN SECURING A FUNDING MECHANISM THAT SAVES BOND COSTS
BY PROVIDING A 10 YEAR INSTALLMENT NOTE FROM THE LID GUARANTY FUND. THE
GUARANTY FUND HAS FUNDS OVER THE REQUIRED loo THAT CAN BE USED AS AN INVESTMENT
AT THE FIXED INTEREST RATE OF 5.17%. THE ATTACHED INSTALLMENT NOTE AND ORDINANCE
PROVIDE THE DETAILS OF THE TRANSACTION. LID 344 WAS FOR SIGNAL/SE 240TH & 108TH
IMPROVEMENTS. IT HAS A NET ASSESSMENT BALANCE AFTER PREPAYMENTS OF $66,097.12
AUTHORIZATION IS REQUESTED TO APPROVE THE ORDINANCE AND AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO
SIGN THE 10 YEAR LID INSTALLMENT NOTE FOR $66,097.12.
FOSTER PEPPER & SHEFELMAN
A LAW PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING
PROFESSIONAL SERVICE CORPORATIONS
BELLEVUE, WASHINGTON OFFICE
(206)4510500
TELECOPIER 20614555487
VIA FACSIMILE
Mr. John Hillman
Chief Accountant
City of Kent
220 4th Avenue South
Kent, WA 98032
1111 THIRD AVENUE
SUITE 3400
SEATTLE. WASHINGTON 96101
(206) 447-4400
TELECOPIER.
(206) 4479700 (206) 447-9263
September 13, 1994
PORTLAND. OREGON O=FILE
(5031 221-0607
TELECORIER (50312211510
Re: City of Kent - LIDs Nos. 342 and 344 Installment
Notes
Dear Mr. Hillman:
Pursuant to your request, attached are two draft ordinances
for presentation to the City's Operation Committee providing for
the issuance of local improvement district installment notes for
LIDS Nos. 342 and 344 to be purchased by the City's Local
Improvement Guaranty Fund. Also attached are forms of each
installment note. Please call with any questions or comments.
When the City Council is prepared to consider these
ordinances, please let us know and we will provide final copies
for passage.
Sincerely,
1
William G. Tonkin
WGT:slh
Attachments (4)
cc (w/enc.):
01495&4.WP
May Miller
Roger Lubovich
CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO.
as follows:
Section 1. Authorization and Description of Note. The total
amount of the assessment roll in Local Improvement District No. 344
in the City of Kent, Washington (the "City"), created under
Ordinance No. 3152, passed January 18, 1994, was $71,702.75. The
30 -day period for making cash payments of assessments without
interest in the District expired on July 13, 1994, and the total
amount of assessments paid in cash was $5,605.63, leaving a balance
of assessments unpaid on the assessment roll in the sum of
$66,097.12. The Local Improvement District No. 344 Installment
Note (the "Note") shall, therefore, be issued pursuant to RCW
35.45.150 as a single installment note in the total principal sum
0149330.01
AN ORDINANCE relating to Local Improvement District
No. 344; fixing the amount, form, date, interest rate and
maturity of the Local Improvement District No. 344
Installment Note; providing for the purchase of such note
by the City from funds on deposit in the Local
Improvement Guaranty Fund; and fixing the interest rate
on Local Improvement District No. 344 assessment
installments.
WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 35.45.150, the City council of
the
City
of Kent, Washington (the "City"), has determined to issue
its
Local Improvement District No. 344 Installment Note in
tha
aggregate principal amount of $66,097.12 and finds it is in
the
best
interest of the City that such note be purchased by the City
from
funds on deposit in the Local Improvement Guaranty Fund of
the
City
and available for investment; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN
as follows:
Section 1. Authorization and Description of Note. The total
amount of the assessment roll in Local Improvement District No. 344
in the City of Kent, Washington (the "City"), created under
Ordinance No. 3152, passed January 18, 1994, was $71,702.75. The
30 -day period for making cash payments of assessments without
interest in the District expired on July 13, 1994, and the total
amount of assessments paid in cash was $5,605.63, leaving a balance
of assessments unpaid on the assessment roll in the sum of
$66,097.12. The Local Improvement District No. 344 Installment
Note (the "Note") shall, therefore, be issued pursuant to RCW
35.45.150 as a single installment note in the total principal sum
0149330.01
Of $66,097.12_ The Note shat.). be dated October 1, 1994; shall
mature on October 1, 2004; shall be in _fully registered form; and
shall be numbered R-1. The Note shall bear interest at the rate of
5.171 per annum (computed on the basis of a 360 -day year of twelve
30 -day months), payable annually beginning October 1, 1995.
Section 2. AnDointment of Note Registrar; Registration and
Transfer of Note. The Finance Division Director of the City is
appointed Note Registrar for the Note. The Note shall be issued to
the City's Local Improvement Guaranty Fund (the "Registered Owner")
only in registered form as to both principal and interest and shall
be recorded on books or records maintained by the Note Registrar
(the "Note Register") The Note Register shall contain the name
and mailing address of the Registered Owner. The Note may not be
assigned or transferred by the Registered Owner. When the Note has
been paid in full, both principal and interest, it shall be
surrendered by the Registered Owner to the Note Registrar, who
shall cancel the Note.
The Note Registrar shall keep, or cause to be kept, at her
office, sufficient books for the registration of the Note. The
Note Registrar is authorized, on behalf of the City, to
authenticate and deliver the Note in accordance with the provisions
of the Note and this ordinance, to serve as the City's paying agent
for the Note and to carry out all of the Note Registrar's powers
and duties under this ordinance and City Ordinance No. 2418
establishing a system of registration for the City's bonds and
obligations. The Note Registrar shall be responsible for the
0149530.01
-2-
i
i
� � ✓ � / �Jl ik � I'�r! r- IJ_ --__ �_ .. 0 _ a 11�.� J � P4'1 I Y - 3� � _ Il �.
representations contained in the Note Registrarfs Certificate of
Authentication on the Note.
Section 3. Payment of Note. Both principal of and interest
on the Note shall be payable solely out of the Local Improvement
Fund, District No. 344 (the "Note Fund"), and from the Local
Improvement Guaranty Fund of the City, and shall be payable in
lawful money of the United -States of America. Interest on the
Note, and any prepaid principal thereon, shall be paid by check,
draft or interfund transfer on the interest payment date to the
Registered Owner at the address appearing on the Note Register.
The final installment of principal and interest on the Note at
maturity or prior repayment is payable at the office of the Note
I
Registrar in Kent, Washington, upon presentation and surrender of
the Note.
Section 4. Prepayment Provisions. The City reserves the
right to prepay principal of the Note prior to its stated maturity
on any interest payment date, at par plus accrued interest to the
date fixed for prepayment, whenever there shall be sufficient money
in the Note Fund to prepay the principal of the Note over and above
the amount required for the payment of the interest then due on the
Note. No notice of prepayment to the Registered owner is required.
Interest on the principal of the Note so prepaid shall cease to
accrue on the date of such prepayment.
Section 5. Failure to Redaem Note. If the Note is not
redeemed when properly presented at its maturity date, the City
shall be obligated to pay interest on the Note at the same rate
provided therein from and after its maturity date until the Note,
0149330.01
_3_
j
1{ _M
both principal and interest, is paid in full or until sufficient
money for its payment in full is on deposit in the Note Fund and
the Note has been called for payment by giving notice of that call
to the Registered Owner.
Section 6. Form and Execution of Note. The Note shall be
printed, lithographed or typed on good bond paper in a form
consistent with the provisions of this ordinance and state law,
shall be signed by the Mayor and the city Clerk, either or both of
whose signatures may be manual or in facsimile, and the seal of the
City or a facsimile reproduction thereof shall be impressed or
printed thereon.
only the Note bearing a Certificate of Authentication in the
following form, manually signed by the Note Registrar, shall be
valid or obligatory for any purpose or entitled to the benefits of
this ordinance:
CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION j
This Note is the fully registered City of Kent,
Washington, Local Improvement District No. 344
Installment Note described in the Note Ordinance.
Finance Divis on Director
Note Registrar
The authorized signing of the Certificate.of Authentication shall
be conclusive evidence that the Note so authenticated has been duly
executed, authenticated and delivered and is entitled to the
benefits of this ordinance.
I
Section 7. Purchase and Sale of Note. The City will purchase
the Note from funds available for investment on deposit in the.
Local Improvement Guaranty Fund of the City at a price of par plus
0149530.01
-4-
_ _r
j!]'�....-.+._.! (ice
accrued interest from the date of the Note to the data of its
transfer to the city. The proper City officials are authorized and
directed to do everything necessary for the prompt delivery of the
Note and for the proper application and use of the proceeds of the
sale thereof.
section 8. Fixing Interest Rate on Assessments. The interest
rate on the installments and delinquent payments of the special
assessments in Local Improvement District No. 344 is revised and
fixed at the rate of 5.67% per annum,
section 9. Effective Date of Ordinance. This ordinance shall
take effect and be in force five (5) dates from and after its
passage and five (5) days following its publication as required by
I
law.
By
JIM WHITE, Mayor
ATTEST:
BRENDA JACOBER, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Special Counsel and Bond
Counsel for the City
Passed the day of , 1994.
Approved the day of 1994.
Published the day of , 1994.
I
0149530.01
-5- '
7
I certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No.
passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, and
approved by the Mayor of the City of Kent as hereon indicated.
Brenda J'acober, City clerk
0149530.01
-6-
(SEAL)
No. R-1 $66,097.12
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
STATE OF WASHINGTON
CITY OF KENT
'LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 344 INSTALLMENT NOTE
Interest Rate:
Registered Owner
Principal Amount:
5.17%
Maturity Date:
2004
CITY OF KENT LOCAL IMPROVEMENT GUARANTY FUND
---SIXTY-SIX THOUSAND NINETY-SEVEN AND 12/100
DOLLARS ($66,097.12)---
N.B. The laws of the State of Washington under which this
Note is issued contain the following section (RCW 35.45.070):
"Neither the holder nor owner of any bond, interest
coupon, or warrant issued against a local improvement
fund shall have any claim therefor against the city or
town by which it is issued, except for payment from the
special assessments made for the improvement for which
the bond or warrant was issued and except also for
payment from the local improvement guaranty fund of the
city or town as to bonds issued after the creation of a
local improvement guaranty fund of that city or town.
The city or town shall not be liable to the holder or
owner of any bond, interest coupon, or warrant for any
loss to the local improvement guaranty fund occurring in
the lawful operation thereof. A copy of the foregoing
part of this section shall be plainly written, printed or
engraved on each bond."
The CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON (the "City"), a municipal
corporation of the State of Washington, promises to pay to the
Registered Owner identified above on the Maturity Date identified
above the Principal Amount identified above and to pay interest
(computed on the basis of a 360 -day year of twelve 30 -day months)
thereon from the date of this Note or from the most recent interest
payment date to which interest has been paid at the Interest Rate
per annum identified above, payable annually beginning ,
1995, to the maturity or earlier prepayment of this Note. If this
Note is not redeemed when properly presented at its maturity date,
then interest shall continue to accrue at the Interest Rate
'Identified above until this Note, both principal and interest, is
paid in full or until sufficient money for its payment in full has
0149533.01
-1-
been deposited in Local Improvement Fund, District No. 344 (the
"Note Fund"), and this Note has been called for payment.
This Note, designated the Local Improvement District No. 344
Installment Note, is issued by the City in fully registered form
pursuant to and in full compliance with the Constitution and laws
of the State of Washington and ordinances of the City, including
Ordinance No. (the "Note Ordinance"). This Note is issued for
the purpose of providing the funds necessary to pay the costs of
constructing the improvements within Local Improvement District
No. 344 of the City as ordered to be carried out by Ordinance
No. 3152 of the City.
The City has reserved the right to prepay principal of this
Note prior to its stated maturity date on any interest payment
date, at par plus accrued interest to the dated fixed for
prepayment, whenever there is sufficient money in the Note Fund to
prepay the principal of the Note over and above the amount required
for the payment of the interest then due on the unpaid Note. No
notice of prepayment to the Registered Owner is required. Interest
on the principal of this Note so prepaid shall cease to accrued on
the date of such prepayment.
Both principal of and interest on this Note are payable in
lawful money of the United States of America. Interest on this
Note, and any prepaid principal thereon, shall be paid by check,
draft or interfund transfer on the interest payment date to the
Registered Owner at the address appearing on the registration books
of the City (the "Note Register") maintained by the Finance
Division Manager of the City (the "Note Registrar"). The final
installment of principal and interest on the Note at maturity or
prior repayment is payable at the office of the Note Registrar in
Kent, Washington, upon presentation and surrender of the Note.
The funds deposited in the Note Fund and the Local Improvement
Guaranty Fund of the City have been and are pledged irrevocably to
the payment of the principal of and interest on this Note. This
Note is not a general obligation of the City.
This Note shall not be valid or become obligatory for.any
purpose until the Certificate of Authentication hereon has been
signed by the Note Registrar.
The principal of and interest on this Note shall be paid only
to the Registered Owner and to no other person or entity, and this
Note may not be assigned or transferred.
The City and the Note Registrar may deem and treat the
Registered Owner of this Note as its absolute owner for the purpose
of receiving payment of principal and interest and for all other
purposes, and neither the City nor the Note Registrar shall be
affected by any notice to the contrary. As used herein, Registered
Owner means the person or entity named as Registered Owner of this
Note on the first page hereof and on the Note Register.
0149533.01
-2-
It is certified, recited and declared that all acts,
conditions and things required to be done precedent to and in the
levying of any assessments and the issuance of this Note have been
done properly, have happened and have been performed in regular and
due form, as required by law, and that this Note has not been
issued in an amount in excess of the cost of the improvements in
Local Improvement District No. 344.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City has caused this Note to be
executed on behalf of the City by its Mayor and City Clerk, and the
seal of the City to be impressed hereon, this day of
September, 1994.
CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON
[SEAL] By
By
Date of Authentication:
Mayor
City Clerk
CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION
This Note is the fully registered City of Kent, Washington,
Local Improvement District No. 344 Installment Note described in
the Note Ordinance.
0149533.01
-3-
0
Finance Division Manager
Note Registrar
LID NO. 344 INSTALLMENT NOTE
PAYMENT RECORD
Interest
Principal
Payment Date Payment Interest
Principal Balance Note
1) Received Paid
Prepaid Due Registrar
Beginning principal balance:
$66,097.12
1995
1996
1997
1998
1909
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
0149533.01
-4-
3'�I�
BJECT•
2.
3
4
F
M
VM
Kent City Council Meeting
Date October 4, 1994
Category Consent Calendar
LID 342 - INSTALLMENT NOTE AND ORDINANCE
As
Committe approval-=_ __
to provide a 10 -year installment note to fund -LID 344
from the LID Guaranty Fund, an uthorizatio _ gttest a to
approve Ordinance No. ,3191_ and have t e ayor sign the
10 -year LID installment note for $57,988.81/
EXHIBITS: Memo from May Miller, letter from Foster Pepper and
Shefelman, ordinance and Installment Note
RECOMMENDED BY: Operations Committee (3-0)
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES X
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $57,988.81
SOURCE OF FUNDS: LID Guaranty Fund
CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 30
4ILLER,MAYENE / KENT70/FN - HPDesk print.
-----------------------------------------
3ur'-�ct: LID 342 - INSTALLMENT NOTE & ORDINANCE
Mayene MILLER / KENT70/FN Dated: 09/20/94 at 1853.
CN AN EFFORT TO SAVE TAXPAYER DOLLARS, BOND COUNSEL- FOSTER PEPPER AND
3HEFELMAN, HAVE ASSISTED IN SECURING A FUNDING MECHANISM THAT SAVES BOND COSTS
3Y PROVIDING A 10 YEAR INSTALLMENT NOTE FROM THE LID GUARANTY FUND. THE
3UARANTY FUND HAS FUNDS OVER THE REQUIRED 10% THAT CAN BE USED AS AN INVESTMENT
3T THE FIXED INTEREST RATE OF 5.170-.. THE ATTACHED INSTALLMENT NOTE AND ORDINANCE
PROVIDE THE DETAILS OF THE TRANSACTION. LID 342 WAS FOR SMITH STREET SIDEWALKS
x HAS A NET ASSESSMENT BALANCE AFTER PREPAYMENTS OF $57,988.81.
AUTHORIZATION IS REQUESTED TO APPROVE THE ORDINANCE AND AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO
SIGN THE 10 YEAR LID INSTALLMENT NOTE FOR $57,988.81.
FOSTER PEPPER & SHEFELMAN
A LAW PARTNERSHIP INCLt1DING
PPOFE SSIONAL SERVICE COPPCIPA-O^1S
BELLEVUE. WASHINGTON OFFICE
(206)4510500
TELECOPIER. (206) 455-5467
VIA FACSIMILE
Mr. John Hillman
Chief Accountant
City of Kent
220 4th Avenue South
Kent, WA 98032
1111 THIRD AVENUE
SUITE 3400
SEATTLE. WASHINGTON 98101
(206) 447-4400
TELECOPIER.
(206)447-9700 (206) 447.9263
September 13, 1994
PORTLAND. OREGON OFFICE
(503)2210607
TELECOPIER (503) 2261510
Re: City of Kent - LIDs Nos. 342 and 344 Installment
Notes
Dear Mr. Hillman:
Pursuant to your request, attached are two draft ordinances
for presentation to the City's Operation Committee providing for
the issuance of local improvement district installment notes for
LIDS Nos. 342 and 344 to be purchased by the City's Local
Improvement Guaranty Fund. Also attached are forms of each
installment note. Please call with any questions or comments.
When the City Council is prepared to consider these
ordinances, please let us know and we will provide final copies
for passage.
WGT:slh
Attachments (4)
cc (w/enc.):
0I49594.WP
May Miller
Roger Lubovich
Sincerely,
re"�
William G. Tonkin
CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE relating to Local Improvement District
No. 342; fixing the amount, form, date, interest rate and
maturity of the Local Improvement District No. 342
Installment Note; providing for the purchase of such note
by the City from funds on deposit in the Local
Improvement Guaranty Fund; and fixing the interest rate
on Local Improvement District No. 342 asseamment
installments.
WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 35.45.150, the City Council of the
City of Kent, Washington (the "City"), has determined to issue its
Local Improvement District No. 342 Installment Note in the
aggregate principal amount of $57,988.81 and finds it is in the
best interest of the City that such note be purchased by the City
from funds on deposit in the Local Improvement Guaranty Fund of the
City and available for investment; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN
as follows:
section 1. Authorization and Description of Note. The total
amount of the assessment roll in Local Improvement District No. 342
in the City of Kent, Washington (the "City"), created under
Ordinance No. 3114, passed May 18, 1993, was $74,926.50. The
30 -day period for making cash payments of assessments without
interest in the District expired on July 13, 1994, and the total
amount of assessments paid in cash was $16,937.69, leaving a
balance of assessments unpaid on the assessment roll in the sum of
$57,988.81. The Local Improvement District No. 342 Installment
Note (the "Note") shall, therefore, be issued pursuant to RCW
35.45.150 as a single installment note in the total principal sum
I
'1149343.01
of $57,988.81. The Note shall be dated October 1, 1994; shall
mature on October 1, 2004; shall be in fully registered form; and
shall be numbered R-1. The Note shall bear interest at the rate of
5.17% per annum (computed on the basis of a 360 -day year of twelve
30 -day months), payable annually beginning October 1, 1995.
Section 2. Amp intment of Note Registrar;` Registration and
Transfer of Note. The Finance Division Director of the City is
appointed Note Registrar for the Note. The Note shall be issued to
the City's Local Improvement Guaranty Fund (the "Registered Owner")
only in registered form as to both principal and interest and shall
be recorded on books or records maintained by the Note Registrar
(the "Note Register"). The Note Register shall contain the name
and mailing address of the Registered owner. The Note may not be
assigned or transferred by the Registered Owner. When the Note has
been paid in full, both principal and interest, it shall be
surrendered by the Registered owner to the Note Registrar, who
shall cancel the Note.
The Note Registrar shall keep, or cause to be kept, at her
office, sufficient books for the registration of the Note, The
Note Registrar is authorized, on behalf of the City, to
authenticate and deliver the Note in accordance with the provisions
of the Note and this ordinance, to serve as the City's paying agent
for the Note and to carry out all of the Note Registrar's powers
I
and duties under this ordinance and City ordinance No, 2418
establishing a system of registration for the City's bonds and
I
obligations. The Note Registrar shall be responsible for the j
0149343.01
-2-
li
i.
7
..i .i _ ;lig
representations contained in the Note Registrar's Certificate of
Authentication on the Note.
Section 3. payment of Note. Both principal of and interest
on the Note shall be payable solely out of the Local Improvement
Fund, District No. 342 (the "Note Fund"), and from the Local
Improvement Guaranty Fund of the City, and shall be payable in
lawful money of the United States of America. Interest on the
Note, and any prepaid principal thereon, shall be paid by check,
draft or interfund transfer on the interest payment date to the
Registered owner at the address appearing on the Note Register.
The final installment of principal and interest on the Note at
maturity or prior repayment is payable at the office of the Note
Registrar in Kent, Washington, upon presentation and surrender of
the Note.
Section 4. Prepayment Provisions. The City reserves the
-right to prepay principal of the Note prior to its stated maturity
on any interest payment date, at par plus accrued interest to the
date fixed for prepayment, whenever there shall be sufficient money
in the Note Fund to prepay the principal of the Note over and above
the amount required for the payment of the interest then due on the
Note. No notice of prepayment to the Registered owner is required.
Interest on the principal of the Note so prepaid shall cease to
accrue on the date of such prepayment.
Section_5. Failure to Redeem Note. If the Note is not
redeemed when properly presented at its maturity date, the City
shall be obligated to pay interest on the Note at the same rate
provided therein from and after its maturity date until the Note,
49343.01
i
-3-
7
3-
both principal and interest, is paid in full or until sufficient
money for its payment in full is on deposit in the Note Fund and
the Note has been called for payment by giving notice of that call
to the Registered owner.
Section 8. Form and Execution of Not The Note shall ba
printed, lithographed or typed on good bond paper in a form j
consistent with the provisions of this ordinance and state law,
shall ba signed by the Mayor and the City clerk, either or both of
whose signatures may be manual or in facsimile, and the seal of the
City or a facsimile reproduction thereof shall be impressed or
printed thereon.
Only the Note bearing a Certificate of Authentication in the
following form, manually signed by the Note Registrar, shall be
valid or obligatory for any purpose or entitled to the benefits of
this ordinance:
CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION
This Note is the fully registered City of Kent,
Washington, Local Improvement District No. 342
Installment Note described in the Note Ordinance.
Finance Division Director
Note Registrar
The authorized signing of the Certificate of Authentication shall
be conclusive evidence that the Note so authenticated has been duly
executed, authenticated and delivered and is entitled to the
benefits of this ordinance.
Section 7.
Purchase and Sale
of Note. The
City will purchase
the Note from
funds available
for investment
on deposit in the
Local Improvement Guaranty Fund of the city at a price of par plus
0139343.01
-4-
i
accrued interest from the date of the Note to the date of its
transfer to the City. The proper City officials are authorized and
directed to do everything necessary for the prompt delivery of the
Note and for the proper application and use of the proceeds of the
sale thereof.
Section 8. Fixing Interest Rate on Assessments, The interest
rate on the installments and delinquent payments of the special
assessments in Local Improvement District No. 342 is revised and
fixed at the rate of 5.67% per annum.
Section 9. Effective Date of Ordinance. This ordinance shall
take effect and be in force five (5) dates from and after its
passage and five (5) days following its publication as required by
law.
By
JIM WHITE, Mayor
ATTEST:
BRENDA JACOBER,
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO
FORM:
Special Counsel
and Bond
Counsel for the
City
Passed the
day of 1994.
Approved the
day of 1994.
Published the
day of 1994.
0149343.01
-5-
I certify that this is a true copy of ordinance No.
passed by the city Council of the City of Kent, Washington, and
approved by the Mayor of the City of Kent as hereon indicated.
(SEAL)
Brenda jacober, City Clerk
0149343.01
-6-
- - -
�j'�`
No. R-1
$57,988.81
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
STATE OF WASHINGTON
CITY OF KENT
LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 342 INSTALLMENT NOTE
Interest Rate: 5.17% Maturity Date: , 2004
Registered Owner: CITY OF KENT LOCAL IMPROVEMENT GUARANTY FUND
Principal Amount: ---FIFTY-SEVEN THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED EIGHTY-
EIGHT AND 81/100 DOLLARS ($57,988.81)---
N.B. The laws of the State of Washington under which this
Note is issued contain the following section (RCW 35.45.070):
"Neither the holder nor owner of any bond, interest
coupon, or warrant issued against a local improvement
fund shall have any claim therefor against the city or
town by which it is issued, except for payment from the
special assessments made for the improvement for which
the bond or warrant was issued and except also for
payment from the local improvement guaranty fund of the
city or town as to bonds issued after the creation of a
local improvement guaranty fund of that city or town.
The city or town shall not be liable to the holder or
owner of any bond, interest coupon, or warrant for any
loss to the local improvement guaranty fund occurring in
the lawful operation thereof. A copy of the foregoing
part of this section shall be plainly written, printed or
engraved on each bond."
The CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON (the "City"), a municipal
corporation of the State of Washington, promises to pay to the
Registered Owner identified above on the Maturity Date identified
above the Principal Amount identified above and to pay interest
(computed on the basis of a 360 -day year of twelve 30 -day months)
thereon from the date of this Note or from the most recent interest
payment date to which interest has been paid at the Interest Rate
per annum identified above, payable annually beginning ,
1995, to the maturity or earlier prepayment of this Note. If this
Note is not redeemed when properly presented at its maturity date,
._.•then interest shall continue to accrue at the Interest Rate
identified above until this Note, both principal and interest, is
paid in full or until sufficient money for its payment in full has
0149,476.01
-1-
been deposited in Local Improvement Fund, District No. 342 (the
"Note Fund"), and this Note has been called for payment.
This Note, designated the Local Improvement District No. 342
Installment Note, is issued by the City in fully registered form
pursuant to and in full compliance with the Constitution and laws
of the State of Washington and ordinances of the City, including
Ordinance No. (the "Note Ordinance"). This Note is issued for
the purpose of providing the funds necessary to pay the costs of
constructing the improvements within Local Improvement District
No. 342 of the City as ordered to be carried out by Ordinance
No. 3114 of the City.
The City has reserved the right to prepay principal of this
Note prior to its stated maturity date on any interest payment
date, at par plus accrued interest to the dated fixed for
prepayment, whenever there is sufficient money in the Note Fund to
prepay the principal of the Note over and above the amount required
for the payment of the interest then due on the unpaid Note. No
notice of prepayment to the Registered Owner is required. Interest
on the principal of this Note so prepaid shall cease to accrued on
the date of such prepayment.
Both principal of and interest on this Note are payable in
lawful money of the United States of America. Interest on this
Note, and any prepaid principal thereon, shall be paid by check,
draft or interfund transfer on the interest payment date to the
Registered Owner at the address appearing on the registration books
of the City (the "Note Register") maintained by the Finance
Division Manager of the City (the "Note Registrar"). The final
installment of principal and interest on the Note at maturity or
prior repayment is payable at the office of the Note Registrar in
Kent, Washington, upon presentation and surrender of the Note.
The funds deposited in the Note Fund and the Local Improvement
Guaranty Fund of the City have been and are pledged irrevocably to
the payment of the principal of and interest on this Note. This
Note is not a general obligation of the City.
This Note shall not be valid or become obligatory for any
purpose until the Certificate of Authentication hereon has been
signed by the Note Registrar.
The principal of and interest on this Note shall be paid only
to the Registered Owner and to no other person or entity, and this
Note may not be assigned or transferred.
The City and the Note Registrar may deem and treat the
Registered Owner of this Note as its absolute owner for the purpose
of receiving payment of principal and interest and for all other
purposes, and neither the City nor the Note Registrar shall be
affected by any notice to the contrary. As used herein, Registered
Owner means the person or entity named as Registered Owner of this
Note on the first page hereof and on the Note Register.
0147476.01
-2-
It is certified, recited and declared that all acts,
conditions and things required to be done precedent to and in the
levying of any assessments and the issuance of this Note have been
done properly, have happened and have been performed in regular and
due form, as required by law, and that this Note has not been
issued in an amount in excess of the cost of the improvements in
Local Improvement District No. 342.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City has caused this Note to be
executed on behalf of the City by its Mayor and City Clerk, and the
seal of the City to be impressed hereon, this day of
September, 1994.
CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON
By
[SEAL] Mayor
By
City Clerk
Date of Authentication:
CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION
This Note is_the fully registered City of Kent, Washington,
Local Improvement District No. 342 Installment Note described in
the Note ordinance.
so
01494X01
-3-
Finance Division Manager
Note Registrar
LID NO. 342 INSTALLMENT NOTE
PAYMENT RECORD
Interest
Payment Date Payment Interest Principal
( 1) Received Paid Prepaid
Beginning principal balance:
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
0144376.01
-4-
Principal
Balance
Due
$57,988.81
Note
Registrar
1. SUBJECT:
Kent City Council Meeting
Date October 4, 1994
Category Consent Calendar
PUGET POWER RECEIPTING - LETTER OF AGREEMENT 0.
2. Ti As recommended b the Operations
",Committe u oriza id 3a
to have the Mayor sign a letter of agreement with
Puget Power for the City to begin receipting Puget Power
payments for our citizens, effective October 1, 1994
911
4
F7
RE
EXHIBITS: Memo from May Miller, Puget Power Letter of
Agreement and addendum
RECOMMENDED BY: Operations Committee (3-0)
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
econds
Council Agenda
Item No. 3P
MILLER,MAYENE / KENT70/FN - HPDesk print.
-----------------------------------------
:ject: PUGET POWER RECEIPTING - LETTER OF AGREEMENT
Creator: Mayene MILLER / KENT70/FN Dated: 09/20/94 at 1828.
AUTHORIZATION IS REQUESTED TO HAVE THE MAYOR SIGN A LETTER OF AGREEMENT WITH
PUGET POWER TO BEGIN RECEIPTING PUGET POWER PAYMENTS. WE HAVE BEEN WORKING
WITH DENNY LENSEGRAV, MANAGER OF THE SOUTH KING DIVISION OF PUGET POWER TO
BEGIN A PILOT PROJECT WHERE THE CITY OF KENT WILL RECEIPT CHECKS OR SIMILAR
INSTRUMENTS THAT ARE MAKE PAYABLE TO PUGET POWER. PUGET POWER WILL REIMBURSE
THE CITY 25 CENTS PER TRANSACTION. THIS WILL PROVIDE KENT RESIDENTS WITH A
DOWNTOWN PAYMENT LOCATION AFTER PUGET POWER MOVE TO THEIR NEW OFFICE. THE
AGREEMENT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY OUR LEGAL DEPARTMENT AND INTERNAL CONTROLS
REVIEWED BY OUR INTERNAL AUDITOR. WE HAVE ATTACHED THE AGREEMENT AND WOULD
LIKE TO BEGIN THE FIRST WEEK IN OCTOBER.
WE ARE EXCITED TO BE ONE OF THE FIRST MUNICIPALITIES IN THE AREA TO WORK IN
A COOPERATIVE VENTURE TO BEGIN THIS RECEIPTING PROGRAM.
PUGET
POWDER Paystation Agreement
Agency
Address
Puget Sound Power & Light ColPmty hereby authorizes you to accept Payments for electrical energy
and other services rendered by this Cot 1peoy. Such paymenl.S muSI he accompanied by stuhs or
billings rendered by its.
In order to assist its in lucaling Ilse account receiving credit when payment is made by check, the
employee receiving the payment shall write the customel'.s account number at the upper left corner of
the check. This applies to checks dmwn In our order and is necessary since many customers pay On
other accounts besides their own.
All hill smhs are to he stamped "paid" in the space provided on the face ol'the still). The paid stamp
will be provided by Puget Power showing tete Company's name, the mune of the agency and the date of
payment. )'oil hereby accept the nesponsibility of safe guarding the paid stamp to prevent its misuse.
In the even of lose you agree to Promptly report such loss Io Puget Power in order to minimize any
furl her loss through misuse of the Stamp.
A report is to he prepared each week, in duplicate, recurding all amounts
collected during each period covered by the report. The Original togelher with all dubs shall he mailed
to Puget Sound Power & Light Comp:my at Isle following address:
All checks drawn to our older and receiml by you shall accompany each report together with your
check for the difference hehaeen the lulal :tmounl of the rep olt and the 1,1:11 of the checks PUy:Ihie to us
YOU hereby agree 1(1 indcnIII ify II fur ;Inv loss o fultsocver nf;un 111(,1 iCs so collected ;IIICI the Samc
shall bane been paid by a cua;umcr In you or to any Person emPl„ve:l. by coli. We ;lgrec lh:lt the
liability shall crnnmcnce only ashen such monies sh;lll have been p;litl to dour A!_ency.
As soon ns convenient after the close of each month. �yc agree to p:lv Ute anlounl of
$ per stub ora minimum oL.$2?.1111 for this service. nr be elfecliye Idol-)
This fee will he reviewed quarterly on the basis of the numher of sluhs I;Iken during the preceding three
months to determine if the anwluu of the commission should be adjusted.
We mill furnish without charge all the necessary suPPlies.
This agreement shall be and cominuc in full force and effect Until terminated by n_i%iog thirty t ,Ill days'
notice in writing by either party.
YOUr signature on the houum of the enclosed copy ol'this letter and its return to Its will he all
acceptance of the terms of this agreement under which you will act as an independent contractor and
Paystation for this Company.
PUGET SOUND POWFR & LIGHT COMPANY
li Y:
NANIF
II IIP
Dale:
ACCEPTED:
By:
NAME
I I'HT
Dale:
1111111-1•t ,.I I1'r 11\'I =1t 11-I1 f PAl'ti 1.\III IN III NA,\!i'f PI INIS I'.1 Y 1 1111 1 (.IN 11-I
M
51 1-e.
ADDENDUM TO PAYSTATION AGREEMENT
This Addendum to Paystation Agreement is executed by and
between Puget Sound Power & Light Company (hereinafter "Company")
and the City of Kent (hereinafter "Agency"). This addendum is
executed concurrently with and supplements that certain
Paystation Agreement entered into by the parties hereto as
follows:
1. Agency shall only accept payments made by check or
other similar instrument payable to Puget Sound Power & Light
Company. Agency shall not accept cash as payment.
2. Agency, in performing services hereunder, shall only be
acting as a depository and shall not be responsible for
processing payments on behalf of Company. Additionally, agency
shall not be responsible for NSF or returned checks or other
invalid instruments used for payment.
3. This agreement may be terminated upon thirty (30) days
written notice to the other party.
PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT CO.
By: _
Title
Date:
CITY OF KENT
By:
Title
Date:
, A/ .ap
2
Kent City Council Meeting
Date October 4, 1994
Category Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: 1995 BUDGET WORKSHOP - SET DATE
0 edpo
SUMMARY STATEMENT: Appro al is reqtteffl to set October 18,
19946 for a Council workshop at 5:30 p.m. to review the 1995
Preliminary Budget document.
This meeting will be used to distribute and review the 1995
Preliminary Budget and to receive further direction from
Council on any additional meetings that may be required before
the adoption of the 1995 Budget. A public hearing is scheduled
for the November 11 1994 Council meeting, and adoption of the
1995 Budget is scheduled for the November 15, 1994 Council
meeting.
3. EXHIBITS•
4. RECOMMENDED BY:
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES
CV
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 3Q
1995 BUDGET PROCESS/CALENDAR
TARGET & GOAL MEETING
3/3
COUNCIL OPERATIONS COMMITTEE
4/27
Financial report - 1st Quarter
Preliminary 1995 baseline forecast for Administration
6/1
BUDGET CALL
Mayor provides budget instructions to departments
Finance updates preliminary baseline budgets
FINANCE MEETS WITH DEPARTMENTS
7/1-7/31
Review and adjust baseline budgets to reflect changing
cost trends, mandates and known contractual changes
COUNCIL OPERATIONS COMMITTEE
7/27
Financial report - 2nd Quarter
Updated 1995 baseline forecast
DEPARTMENT PRESENTATIONS TO ADMINISTRATION
8/1-8/30
Departmental presentations of issues
COUNCIL REGULAR
8/2
Proposed Use Public Hearing on 1995 Budget
COUNCIL WORKSHOP 5:30 - 6:45
8/16
July financial report
Preliminary 1995 baseline budgets and financial forecast update
COUNCIL OPERATIONS COMMITTEE
8/24
July financial report
Preliminary 1995 baseline budgets and financial forecast update
BUDGET BALANCING
9/1-9/30
Administrative adjustments - adds/cuts
COUNCIL WORKSHOP 5:30
10/18
Overview of 1995 Preliminary Budget Document
COUNCIL OPERATIONS COMMITTEE
10/26
Financial report - 3rd Quarter
Budget Review
COUNCIL REGULAR
11/1
Public Hearing on 1995 Budget
COUNCIL OPERATIONS COMMITTEE
11/9
1995 Budget Review
COUNCIL REGULAR
11/15
Adoption of Budget and Tax Levy Ordinance
COUNCIL OPERATIONS COMMIT'T'EE
11/23
Financial Report - October
COUNCIL REGULAR - PROPOSED
12/13
Adoption of Final Adjustments for 1994
95budcal
Kent City Council Meeting
Date October 4, 1994
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: JONES/HOBBS ANNEXATION - SET HEARING DATE
CLU
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Authorization to set October 18
data for the public hearing on the proposed Jones/Hobbs
Annexation and for the Clerk to provide the required statutory
notice.
The City has had its "Notice of Intent" approved by the County
Boundary Review Board and has received a valid annexation
petition signed by the owners of not less than 60% of the
assessed valuation of the proposed annexation area. As a
result, it is now appropriate to set a date for the public
hearing to consider the proposed "Jones/Hobbs" Annexation to
the City of Kent.
3. EXHIBITS: Mans
4
5.
21
7.
RECOMMENDED BY:
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 3R
JONES/HO-BBS ANNEXATION AN -94-1
Kc
sN
� uo,�
a
:CT
BECK ANNEXATION
Kent City Council Meeting
Date October 4, 1994
Category Consent Calendar
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Ac t as com a Beck Annexation
petition, as supplemented a propriate "no -protest"
agreements, and ion to staff epare and file a Notice
of Inten garding the proposed Beck Anne n with the
rn„n_ Boundary Review Board.
On September 6, 1994, the City accepted a valid notice of
intent to form an annexation (the "Beck" annexation) signed by
the owners of not less than 10% of the area proposed for
annexation. At this time, the City is in possession of
Mr. Beck's annexation petition together with signed "no -
protest" (to annexation) agreements equaling more than 60% of
the assessed valuation of the proposed annexation area.
Because these no -protest agreements are the equivalent of
actual signatures on an annexation petition, it is now appro-
priate to accept the petition (combined with the no -protest
agreements) as complete and to direct staff to prepare a
"Notice of Intent" document for filing with the County Boundary
Review Board.
3. EXHIBITS: Map
4. RECOMMENDED BY:
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
YES
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 3S
ITEM 3S --BECK ANNEXATION
NOTE: The following "Summary Statement" and "City Council Action" sections are
intended to REPLACE those sections for Item 3. S., 'Beck Annexation."
Summary Statement: On September 6, 1994, the City accepted a valid notice of
intent to form an annexation (the 'Beck" annexation) signed by the owners of not less than 10%
of the area proposed for annexation. At this time, the City is in possession of signed "no protest"
(to annexation) agreements equaling more than 60% of the assessed valuation of the proposed
annexation area. Because these "no protest" agreements are the equivalent of actual signatures on
an annexation petition, it is now appropriate to accept the no protest agreements as the equivalent
of a valid petition and to direct staff to prepare a "Notice of Intent" document for filing with the
County Boundary Review Board.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves,
Councilmember seconds, to accept the appropriate "no protest" to annexation
agreements on file as the equivalent of a complete 60% petition for the Beck Annexation
and direction to staff to prepare and file a Notice of Intent regarding the proposed Beck
Annexation with the County Boundary Review Board.
Kent City Council Meeting
Date October 4. 1994
Category Other Business
1. SUBJECT: STREET USE PERMIT ORDINANCE
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: The Public Works Committee has recom-
mended adoption of an ordinance amending Chapter 6.07 of the
Kent City Code entitled "Street Use Permits" to require the
issuance of a building permit prior to the issuance of street
use permit for moving a house to be sited within the City
limits>
3. EXHIBITS: Public Works minutes, Public Works Director
memorandum and draft ordinance
4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (2-1)
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
CouncilmemberJA1An/L,,� move Councilmember seconda4�
to adopt Ordinance No. :�(9 amending Chapter 6.07 of the Kent
City Code to require that a building permit be issued prior to
the issuance of a street use permit for moving a house to a
sited area within the City limits.
DISCUSSION•
ACTION:—
Council
CTION•
Council Agenda
Item No. 4A
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
September 26, 1994
TO: Public WorksCo(m�mittee
FROM: Don Wickstrom �
RE: Street Use Ordinance
As you are aware, there has been much concern in the community about the houses that
were moved and never set on a foundation. To try and address this repeated scenario the
City Attorney has drafted an amendment to the Street Use Ordinance. Essentially it
requires that prior to the issuance of a street use permit for moving a house that is to be
sited within the City limits, that a building permit for the site first be obtained. The City
Attorney will be present to review this ordinance and answer any questions the Committee
may have thereon.
ACTION: Recommend adoption of this ordinance.
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the
City of Kent, Washington, amending Chapter
6.07 relating to street use permits and the
moving of buildings or structures across,
along or upon a public place within the City.
WHEREAS, Chapter 6.07 relating to street use permits
requires a street use permit to move a building or structure across
or along a public place within the City of Kent; and
WHEREAS, in the past, such structures have been moved
into or within the City with no final destination established
thereby resulting in those buildings or structures being stored on
property without permanent footings or foundations; and
WHEREAS, the storage of buildings or structures without
permanent footings or foundations has resulted in dangerous
buildings and fire hazards; and
WHEREAS, the Council desires to alleviate the problem of
storage of buildings and structures without permanent footings or
foundations and the resulting dangerous and hazardous conditions
they create by amending Chapter 6.07 to require building permits
for siting said building or structure prior to issuance of street
use permits; NOW, THEREFORE,
&%,,,, gee (Rexm"4
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES
HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Kent City Code Chapter 6.07 entitled "Street
Use Permits" is hereby amended by amending Section 6.07.040 to read
as follows:
Sec. 6.07.040. Permit application.
To obtain a permit, the person shall file an application
on a form furnished by the city for that purpose. Every application
shall, where applicable:
1. Identify the property by legal description and
address for which a building, grading or fill permit is being
sought or an accurate description of the public place or portion
thereof desired to be used.
2. Provide the use desired to be made of such public
place by the applicant.
3. Provide the plans and specifications for any utility
or structure desired to be constructed, erected or maintained by
the applicant in or on a public place.
4. Identify routes to be utilized to and from the
property.
S. Identify the owner of the property being developed.
6. Identify the contractor and subcontractor
responsible for the development work.
7. Include the state contractor's number of such
2
contractor or subcontractor.
8. Include the city business license number of such
contractor or subcontractor.
9. Be signed by the owner or the agent of the firm who
will be actually responsible for the development work.
10. Include a copy of any building permit as required in
Section 6.07.05Q(C) below for any building or structure to be moved
across along or upon any public place pursuant to a permit issued
herein and sited within the City of Kent.
SECTION 2. Kent City Code Chapter 6.07 is further
amended by amending Section 6.07.050 to read as follows:
Sec. 6.07.050. Processing of applications.
A. The director shall examine each application
submitted to determine if it complies with the provisions of this
chapter. In order to ascertain any facts which may aid in
determining whether a permit shall be granted, the director may
inspect the premises which are desired to be used under the permit.
B. If the director finds that the application presented
to him or her for approval conforms to the requirements of this
chapter, and also that the proposed use of such -public place will
not unduly interfere with the rights of the public or unduly
interfere or compete with adjacent uses on public or private
property or otherwise constitute a threat to the health, safety and
welfare of the public, then he or she may approve such application.
3
permit for any building or structure to be moved across along or
upon any public place within the City of Kent and sited within the
City the applicant shall first obtain a buildingT)ermit for the
siting of said building or structure
SECTION 3. Severability. If any section, sentence,
clause or phrase of this ordinance should be held to be invalid or
unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such
invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or
constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase
of this ordinance.
SECTION 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take
effect and be in force thirty (30) days from and after its passage,
approval and publication as provided by law.
JIM WHITE, MAYOR
4
ATTEST:
BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ROGER A. LUBOVICH, CITY ATTORNEY
PASSED
APPROVED
PUBLISHED
day of
day of
day of
. 1994.
. 1994.
1994.
I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance
No. passed. by the City Council of the City of Kent,
Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the City of Kent as hereon
indicated..
jtm".o'xl
BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK
5
(SEAL)
improvements along 108th were made. Radford made reference to a contract and
Wickstrom noted that this refers to the City asking the School District to amend the
obligation so that we could use their money to build parts of this path, plus using our own
money. He said that the intent is that we would build it all at once including the piece on
108th; the path on 110th would be opened at the same time the shoulder widening is done
on 108th and at that point the bussing would end. Wickstrom said the only delay could
occur during condemnation which could take up to six months. In response to Brubaker,
Wickstrom stated that during the time of condemnation; as long as the improvements are
not built, the bussing will continue. Radford requested that this bussing situation be put
in writing. Lubovich suggested that a letter of understanding be prepared with both
parties signing.
Committee unanimously agreed that contingent upon the letter of understanding being
written by Public Works to the School District, authorize the construction of 110th walkway
for Meadow Ridge Elementary.
(� Street Use Ordinance
Lubovich stated that the Mayor is concerned about the structures we have had in the city
where buildings get moved in and situated on lots without being permanently placed. He
said that the conditioning of moving a house thru the City requires a street use permit, and
Lubovich recommended conditioning that permit issuance upon obtaining a building permit
for siting the building before it is moved. Lubovich stated that in talking with Jim Bennett,
Bennett had some concerns about this in that he felt we may be over -regulating.
Committee unanimously recommended approval of the suggested changes to the Street
Use Ordinance.
Opticom System
Wickstrom explained that Opticom is what gives preemption status to our fire vehicles on
emergency responses and it works off a strobe light system and what we presently have
is very antiquated. We have been having problems with the system over the years and
now we have an opportunity to get a trade-in as a promotional deal with 3M Company,
which would save the City about $75,000. He said since this needs to be done, we should
do it now instead of waiting thru the'95 budget cycle. He said, if we wait the trade-in deal
won't be there and it will cost us more money. He said we have some money in completed
street projects that we want to reallocate to do this. Clark asked, if the current system is
triggered by other types of vehicles; is there any guarantee that the new system will not
be volatile to that? White explained that it will go to a protection system and the strobe will
only pick up certain patterns.
Committee unanimously recommended implementing the project and establishing the fund
as explained. Bennett concurred with this recommendation by phone, with Wickstrom.
Kent City Council Meeting
Date October A. 1994
Categury Other Business
1. SUBJECT: VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER PROPOSED TAX LEVY LID LIFT -
RESOLUTION
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: The Operations Committee has recommended
adoption of a resolution opposing Valley Medical Center's pro-
poocd tax levy lid lift. Valley Medical Center is proposing a
tax levy lid lift which may impact funding of junior taxing
districts. The resolution encourages citizens of Kent and
local neighboring communities to become informed of the impacts
to public safety as a result of the proposed tax levy lid lift,
and further encourages junior taxing districts and the State
legislature to evaluate long term funding options and solutions
to meet the community's needs for public safety services.
3.
4.
5
RN
EXHIBITS: Resolution
RECOMMENDED BY: Operations Committee
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT:
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
NO X YES
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmemberr�4nn movea4� Councilmember secondee
to adopt Resolution No. L41�__ opposing Valley Medical Center's
proposed Hospital District tax lid lift due to the public
safety impacts to the citizens of Kent and neighboring
communities.
DISCUSSION:
.ACTION:_
Council Agenda
Item No. 4B
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION of the City of Kent,
Washington, opposing Valley Medical Center's
proposed Hospital District tax lid lift due
to the public safety impacts to the citizens
of Kent and neighboring communities.
WHEREAS, the City of Kent has a critical interest in
protecting our community from emergencies and flooding; and
WHEREAS, the Green River Flood Zone District is a
Junior Taxing District that maintains and operates the valley
flood prevention system; and
WHEREAS, there are important ongoing Flood District
responsibilities for maintenance of the levee system, yet the
District operates on limited resources; and
WHEREAS, as Fire Districts are Junior Taxing Districts
which have essential response agreements to provide for the
safety and protection of life of local area residents; and
WHEREAS, as the demand for public safety services
continues to be high; and
WHEREAS, the ability to protect the local community is
critically tied to the City's and Fire District's ability to
share resources; and
WHEREAS, Valley Medical Center (Hospital District #1)
has proposed to lift its tax lid by $.50/$1,000 assessed
valuation; and
WHEREAS, such a lid lift increases the potential for
prorationing (reducing the levy rate) of the Flood Zone and Fire
Protection Districts; and
WHEREAS, without the pursuit of alternative funding for
the Flood Zone and Fire Protection Districts, the Valley Medical
Center lid lift could have a negative impact on the ability of
these Districts to deliver basic services in the near or
immediate future; and
WHEREAS, the potential for continued prorationing of
these Junior Taxing Districts, over the long term, could create
critical public safety concerns; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
2
Section 1. That the Kent City Council is opposed to
valley Medical Center's tax lid levy as currently proposed due to
the public safety impacts to the citizens of Kent and the
neighboring communities.
Section 2. That the Kent City Council encourages all
citizens to become informed as to the impacts related to
potential prorationing of Junior Taxing Districts as a result of
the proposed Hospital District tax lid lift.
Section 3. That the Kent City Council encourages the
Junior Taxing Districts and State Legislators to establish as a
high priority the evaluation of long term funding options and
solutions which will meet the community's need for public safety
services.
Passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Kent, Washington this day of , 1994.
Concurred in by the Mayor of the City of Kent, this
day of , 1994.
ATTEST:
JIM WHITE, MAYOR
BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK
_ 3
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ROGER A. LUBOVICH, CITY ATTORNEY
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy
of Resolution No. , passed by the City Council of the
City of Kent, Washington, the day of
VALYMED2.RES
BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK
4
1994.
(SEAL)
Kent City Council Meeting
Date October 4, 1994
Category Bids
1. SUBJECT: 116TH AVENUE SE WATER MAIN RELOCATION
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Bid opening for this project was held
on September 29th with nine bids received. The low bid was
submitted by Fournier Construction, Inc. in the amount of
$89,937.22 including tax. The Engineer's estimate was
$99,246.45.
The project consists of relocating an existing 12" waterline on
116th Avenue from 270th to 272nd in order to conform to future
272nd Corridor road grade which is being built by the
developers of the Kingstone plat.
3. EXHIBITS: Public Works Director memorandum and vicinity map
4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Director
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $89,937.22
SOURCE OF FUNDS: Miscellaneous Water Funds
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember-ALa,, .,., movea,� Councilmember/i4l..�, second
that the 116th Avenue SE Water Main Relocation contract be
awarded to Fournier Construction, Inc. for the bid amount of
$89,937.22.
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 5A
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
October 4, 1994
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Don Wickstromw
RE: 116th Avenue SE Water Main Relocation
Bid opening for this project was September 29th with nine bids received. The low bid was
submitted by Fournier Construction, Inc. in the amount of $89,937.22.
It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director that this bid be accepted and the
contract be awarded to Fournier Construction, Inc.
BID SUMMARY:
Fournier Construction, Inc.
89,937.22
Western Eng. Constructors
90,682.42
Universal Land
92,291.90
Lloyd Enterprises
92,521.82
Fardig Development
105,051.38
Virginia L. Sietz
112,106.02
G & M
119,885.60
Gary Merlino
121,129.90
Paramount Pacific
140,800.66
Engineers Estimate 99,246.45
2
( �v h i ti.
3S 3A V H1911
Q)
3'S 3A V H1 p//
N
Hl 927
3S 3i1 d H160/
® 3S
3A F Ob'f' .
� 3S
3S 3A MeZ/
3/t V 1 S/Z/ kN 3S
c� 311 d 1 S6Zi
h
3S 3A d
® Fi,
H101
Sit tr
7d H18//EN h
3S3A V
C `::.y.
...... ............
/a3SOdo&d/
�0 3S •7d H1L/1
w
—
NM „Z/ M3N —' ---- —
.0/ 9N/1 S/X3
3S 3A H19// 03SOd06td —�`�
Li
IN iY1
Kent City Council Meeting
Date October 4, 1994
Category Bids
1. SUBJECT: KIWANIS TOT LOT #1 RENOVATION
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Four bids were received for the Kiwanis
Tot Lot #1 renovation project. Parkwood Services, Inc. of
Seattle was the 1 w bidder at $65,625 (base bid of $62,200 plus
Alternates 1 and The engineer's estimate was $60,000-
65,000, including Alternates 1 and i2-.
_5
3. EXHIBITS: Bid tabulation, recommendation letter from Hough
Beck & Baird Landscape Architects
4. RECOMMENDED BY: Hough Beck & Baird Landscape Architects and
Parks Administration
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc.)
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $65.625
SOURCE OF FUNDS: CIP and Block Grant
7. CITY COUNCIL ACT//ION:
Councilmember movee� Councilmember ��C,9�� secondmw
to award the Kiwanis Tot Lot #1 project to Parkwood Services,
Inc. in the amount of $65,625, which includes the base bid of
$62,200 plus Alternates 1 and�Z.
S
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 5B
H
Ln
0 0
Ln
z
Lo
;1'
,a
O 0
co
rn
z
H
0
U
P4
0
A
co
ao
0
0
E4
r
z
r -I
O
rn
o
Ln
acr)
Ln
H
0
O
E-4
[—
o
1.7 41
U)
61
h
H
W
ri ftl N
N
P
N
a Vl
U
r -I
-�
�
H W
r
A
'z, P4
3
E
W
-r-I
UJ
P4
x�
Gu
U
m
O
W
H
�
�
v
M
o
Ln
H
A
a �
UWPO
O
WA
Ln
0 0
Ln
L—
Lo
;1'
,a
O 0
co
rn
k.0
0
co ri
co
ao
0
0
E4
r
rn
r -I
m
Ln
o
Ln
Ln
Ln
r-
0
O
(n
[—
co
1.7 41
U)
61
h
H
N
ri ftl N
a Vl
M
r -I
co
lfl
h
r
U
H
O
OJ
M
o
Ln
M [q
�
O
O
CO
O
Ln
O
Ol
H
O
H
J.) •r{
O
N
co
O
O
a'
Ln
l0
h
l0
N
b) A
(' •rl
N -rl fIS
O
O
Ln
O
O
• �
C)
m
Ln
w
o
•rl
o
rn
M
%.D
Ln
r-qs40
_
�Aw
M
L
M
y
O
o
m
o
�.D
U
o
Ln
Ln
O
o
11 Gi
Ln
d'
kO
lD
N
l<w
H
A
H
(T�
co
O
L-
O
O
CD O
O
Ln
o
TA
O O
N
h
CY)
0
a'
Ln Ln
N
M
pq
Ln Lo
Lo
0
r
m
(1)
`
U
!11
v
GL
O
co
O t�
,-i 44
U
m O
CO
0
ro
�
>,
4-)
�
°o��i
co
x
M
o
a m
M�4
�4
41
U
(D a-)
A
oo
m
(
004
(�
[rj
P4 H
U U) H
U
04 U H
We
d the
of this
act to Prkood Services, in Seattle, on the
their low base nbid, plus alltternates one rand fiive.forwbasis of
a total bid award of $65,625.00
King County Block Grant, who is providing partial funding for this project, has also approved
Parkwood Services.
Best regards,
HOtJG BECK B 1RD INC.
Colie ugh -Beck, ASIA
President
CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS
A.
R E P O R T S
COUNCIL PRESIDENT�LA
_11�2/a
B. OPERATIONS COMMI
CO PUUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE O/Cd.vri - i� L4�/lP
a
E.
(F
COMMITTEEPARKS % ♦ ire ri / r
CG) ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS
?"os�.,v, .
OPERATIONS COMMITTEE MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 14, 1994
- COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT: Jon Johnson - Chair, Leona Orr, Christi Houser
STAFF PRESENT: Laurie Evezich, Lori Hastings, Roger Lubovich, May Miller, Kelli O'Donnell,
Helen Wickstrom
MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC: Leah Kohlenberg -Valley Daily News
The meeting was called to order at 9:33 a.m. by Chairperson Johnson.
Approval of Vouchers All claims for the period ending August 31, 1994, in the amount of
$1,717,758.15 were approved for payment.
Added Item Establish Budget for Youth Conference
Finance Division Director May Miller brought forward an item from the Police Department
requesting the establishment of a $10,000 budget for the annual "Game of Life" youth conference.
which would be funded by grants and donations from various organizations. Committeemember
Houser moved to establish the budget for the youth "Game of Life" conference. Orr seconded the
motion which passed with a vote of 3-0. ' May asked if it was okay to place this item on the Consent
Calendar of the next Council meeting. The Committee concurred.
Parks Projects, Budget Change
Parks Administration Superintendent Helen Wickstrom asked for authorization to make the parks
projects budget change as outlined in the memorandum distributed with the agenda.
Committeemember Orr moved to approve the recommended budget adjustment, Houser seconded
and the motion passed 3-0.
Added Item - Demolition of Morrill House
Helen Wickstrom distributed a memorandum which outlined her request for additional funding to
demolish the Morrill property. Helen explained that the demolition was not planned at the time of
purchase but due to the results of a building inspection it would be more cost effective to demolish
the house. Helen requested the addition of $8,023.50 from the reserve fund to cover this expense.
During further expense May Miller noted that this would be an appropriate amount. Houser moved
to appropriate the funds needed to destroy the Morrill House, Orr seconded and the motion passed
3-0. Miller asked for approval to put this item on the Consent Calendar which was approved.
Procurement Code Chafe
City Attorney Roger Lubovich stated that the current procurement code which was enacted a couple
of years ago has become cumbersome. He explained that his proposed changes would streamline
the process and if adopted by ordinance the procurement of items $50,000 or higher would need
Council approval with items lower than $50,000 being signed by the Mayor through a process
outlined by administrative procedure. Lubovich elaborated that anything over $50,000, excluding
Public Works and architectural contracts which are covered by R.C.W., would require a public bid
and Council approval. Professional and consultant contracts may be negotiated instead of bid since
it is not usually possible to bid these types of contracts. He noted that a provision is also included
for supply contracts on which the City can solicit bids on a sample range of products for an annual
contract.
OPERATIONS COMMITTEE MINUTES, Cont.
Se tember 14, 1994
Lubovich explained the Administrative Policy which would apply to contracts under $50,000 would
allow Department Heads to approve contracts under $10,000 if the are already budgeted, bids from
$10,000 to $25,000 would require telephone quotes and purchases of $25,000 to $50,000 would
require a request for bids.
Roger explained that bidding all purchases over $15,000 is causing problems with suppliers who do
not normally do bids as well as costly advertising and time delays. During discussion Christi Houser
requested that in the future a memo on the changes being made to an ordinance be included in the
agenda for clarification. Johnson stated that he was uncomfortable going from a limit of $15,000
up to $50,000 although funds are already authorized. Roger responded that this is only a proposal
for bidding requirements. The requirements for lower amounts could be incorporated into one
ordinance or the limit for Council authorization could be lowered to $25,000 for example. Orr noted
she would be more comfortable with a lower limit and that she hasn't seen the administrative policy
or a comparison of what the current practice is compared to the proposal. During further discussion
May noted that having the limit at $15,000 sometimes increases the burden on her division. City
Attorney Lubovich was directed to bring this item back to the next meeting with the old and new
ordinances, proposed administrative policies and a summary of the differences being distributed with
the agenda.
Adult Entertainment Business License
Roger Lubovich asked to combine this item with the next item on the agenda. Johnson agreed.
Land Use Moratorium - Adult Entertainment
Roger informed the Committee that the current ordinance was judged constitutional but does not
allow enough sites and was deemed too conditional due to set back requirements. Roger noted that
he was pleased that the ordinance was upheld but the City needs to deal with Growth Management
in the next few months by adopting a comprehensive plan with the related zoning changes being
adopted in 1995. Roger explained that these changes have the potential of changing the face of the
map next year and recommended that the City implement a moratorium until the zoning is dealt with
on adult entertainment. He explained that the moratorium would be effective for six months at a
time and that a hearing must be held within 60 days of adoption. Jon Johnson suggested that at the
next Council meeting a hearing date be set. Lubovich suggested that if the ordinance is not adopted
as an emergency ordinance it would take 30 days to become effective. He suggested that it be
adopted as an emergency ordinance effective immediately, that Council set a hearing date and ask
the Planning Commission to review and develop an interim plan until it can be dealt with through
the Growth Management process.
Roger explained that licensing of these operations is concerned with the secondary effects such as
crime in the area and activities at the facility itself. He noted that the provisions in the proposed
licensing code follow Kitsap County which requires that any money exchanged between patrons and
the dancers only be allowed through management which gives responsibility to management to
monitor activities. Other changes have been made from the current code to clarify the licensing
requirements of entertainers and managers. Assistant City Attorney Laurie Evezich elaborated that
Page 2
OPERATIONS COMMITTEE MINUTES, Cont.
September 14, 1994
the present license code for managers/entertainers does not clearly define an entertainer as a dancer
while the proposed code explains this and clarifies that the entertainer must also obtain a license.
During further explanation, Laurie noted that the information required of dancers replicates that of
manager, except for some financial information, relating to their personal conduct. This
requirement has been upheld by the 9th Circuit Court of appeals in the case of Kev vs. Kitsap
County. It was also noted that the license may be revoked if the holder of an adult entertainment
license violates any federal, state or local laws. After discussion with the Committee, Christi Houser
moved to adopt a moratorium on adult entertainment land use for six months with the hearing to be
set at the Council meeting within 60 days and for the Planning Commission to come up with an
interim plan for adult entertainment land use. Orr seconded and the motion carried 3-0.
Roger Lubovich stated that the adult entertainment license requirements would be in substantially
the same form with a memorandum attached explaining any changes that are made. Christi moved
to recommend the adoption of the ordinance, Orr seconded and the motion carried 3-0.
Added Item Council Meeting Ordinance
Committee Chair Johnson explained that this had been discussed at the Council retreat and the
proposed ordinance provides for one meeting in December and in the case of election night the
meeting would change to the next day as dictated under the Open Meetings Act for holidays. Orr
noted that if the meeting is held on a Wednesday she would not be able to attend. Lubovich noted
that the holidays rule under the Open Meetings Act does not necessarily apply to an election night.
Houser noted that election returns are not normally in until after midnight. After further discussion,
Houser moved to amend the proposed ordinance to delete the change of "or a day during which a
primary or general county -wide election is being held ... next business" and recommend adoption
to Council. Orr seconded the motion which passed 3-0.
Committee Chair Johnson asked if there was anymore business to come before the Committee and
with no response adjourned the meeting at 10:20 a.m..
Page 3
Brenda Jacober
City Clerk
Parks Committee Minutes
September 6, 1994
Councilmembers Present: Paul Mann, Jim Bennett
Staff Present: John Hodgson, Pete Petersen, Tom Brubaker, Teri Stump
Others Present:
Jennifer Stoner, Saturday Market;
Harold Perantie, Golf Advisory Board
SATURDAY MARKET REPORT: Jennifer Stoner presented the Saturday Market Report. The market
experienced nine cancellations due to rain over the weekend. Jennifer is receiving calls from Puyallup
and Tacoma vendors who are closed for the season. The market closed at 3:00 p.m. on Sunday for
Canterbury Faire; as a good will gesture, Jennifer gave the vendors 50% of their fee back. Cornucopia
Days, has proven to be a low revenue day; Jennifer is hoping to work with the city to encourage traffic
to the market by taking over the car show and reviving the art walk. A survey of Cornucopia Days was
conducted with the vendors; they requested security and to initiate a requirement that only vendors who
have sold more than three times prior can sell during Cornucopia Days.
The Board voted to replace member Dorothy Woodruff due to lack of attendance, as stated in the
Saturday Market Ordinance. A de -briefing meeting will be held on October 10 to allow vendors input
on problems, new ideas, rules and the future of the Market. Jim Bennett has been contacted by ex -city
employees who want to give something back to Kent by offering to provide security at special events
such as the Market. John responded that this needs to be directed to the Human Resource Department.
Jennifer shared that a vendor donation box has collected approximately $200 during the market and she
felt this money could possibly be used for security pay.
GOLF ADVISORY REPORT: Harold Perantie presented the unapproved minutes from the Golf Advisory
Board meeting of August 24, 1994. Harold reported that Jim Stone might have two potential $500,000
investors to upgrade the range and mini putt, if an agreement between the City and S.S.M.D. could be
worked out. The Advisory Board recommends the call-in system over the computer system. Players
were polled randomly and preferred the call-in system; a few members of the Ladies' Club prefer the
Tee -time system better. Both Councilmembers Bennett and Mann endorse the call-in system.
The Board also recommends the City review the marshal contract; it provides 95% of the city's revenue.
Harold also stated there are indications that people, including marshals, are playing free rounds.
Harold suggested including a capital maintenance category in the budget for maintenance projects that
come along such as: painting, carpets, nets, poles, etc. Pete Petersen will clarify certain legal issues
with Tom Brubaker on construction of the permanent restrooms before permits can be obtained.
John responded to Harold's report that he is aware of the free golf allegations and is addressing this
issue with S.S.M.D. He is also revising the marshalling program and comp rounds of golf for Riverbend.
John and Pete presented the Master Plan to the Advisory Board on August 24 and next week they will
present to the Ladies' and Men's clubs next week. A public meeting for input on the plan will be held
at the end of September.
Parks Committee Meeting
September 6, 1994
Page Two
GOLF RANGE/MINI PUTT TOUR: John skipped ahead on the agenda to this item and invited the
councilmembers to a tour of local mini putts and ranges; it is tentatively set for September 14 at
11:00 a.m. Councilmember Mann declined the invitation stating he has seen most of the local mini putts
and ranges and has always supported enhancing ours to encourage more family oriented recreation
in the area. Discussion followed regarding mini putts. John will confirm the tour date with Christie
Houser and Jim next week.
Councilmember Bennett read a letter from the Tacoma Golf Association regarding a request for reduced
fees for their tournament. A discount tournament has already been done this year. John is reluctant to
allow too many discount tournaments each year because of the loss in revenue and if the words gets
out we will have too many requests for discount rates. John will discuss this request with the S.S.M.D.
YOUTH/TEEN PROGRAM UPDATE: John met with the Lighthouse Advisory Board and discussed the
need for expansion as the program extends throughout the city. Staff continues to meet with apartment
complex owner and occupants in hopes to develop the involvement of families working together. By
mid-September the program plan will be outlined. Jim Bennett stated that a policy and procedure needs
to be set prior to initialization of the program. John replied that the Youth/Teen Committee will be
forming a policies and procedures for the program and that it is time to get staff on board and get the
program going.
Councilmember Bennett was concerned with adaptability of "at -risk" youth to community programs and
asked what kind of background will be required of new staff. John replied that the program will give
youth something to do, by bringing it to them or by bringing them to it. He sees the program not
happening over night, but by starting with some ideas going with success and building on them. One
of John's concerns is the level of transportation involved; this needs to be discussed. Jim Bennett who
is a member of the Transit Advisory Board hoped we can coordinate mutual transit ventures for youth
transportation around the city and that it is very expensive. John added that he plans to hire the best
in the field. Councilmember Bennett felt the program needs more "street wise" staff than academic
credentials John responded that we have the professionals who can teach them program management;
he wants staff who want to positively impact the lives of kids and families in the community.
John also shared that he will be meeting next week with division heads from police, fire and human
services to find out what each other is doing in regard to youth programs. This knowledge will be a
strong force and will ensure a great bond between the city and the community. John Hodgson met with
the Chambers Governmental Committee. Eventually he plans to copy the Yakima Youth Leadership
which has proven to be very successful. He will be contacting local business' to get involved and find
out what jobs are available to offer the youth of our community.
Discussion proceeded to the Ordinance for the youth/teen program in reference to it's vagueness,
leaving the city open for outside agencies to compete with Parks and Recreation in the development of
youth programs. Paul Mann brought up Jungle Gym, a business currently lobbying the city for the
money to develop and run the youth/teen program. John is aware of this company and wished they
could be allied. Councilmember Bennett felt for fairness, each side could develop and produce a plan
for the youth program and present it to the council. John Hodgson replied that he hopes the Recreation
Department's program will be all encompassing and meet all the needs of the community. Paul Mann
said we also need to review the Ordinance again and revise it so that we aren't challenged by outside
organizations wanting to lobby for the money.
Parks Committee Meeting
September 6, 1994
Page Three
Councilmember Bennett voiced concern over the monitoring of local youth programs, namely Project
Lighthouse. He questions the reports which claim 300 youth use the center, because he doesn't see
that many utilizing the services. John responded there is no tool to measure Human Service programs --
how can you prove that because a child has been attending programs at a youth center he/she will
make it in life. It is proven that crime has dropped in the neighborhoods where youth programs have
been organized. John said we have a short term and long term objective; as long as a kid is involved
in a program for 5-6 hours per day; that is 5-6 hours they are not on the streets and over a period of
time we can influence their lives positively. Councilmember Bennett felt it would be hard to impact kids
in apartments due to the six month average stay. John stated that as most city departments are
increasing funds directed toward youth, so are we; we need to give kids something to do.
Councilmember Mann reiterated that Parks and Recreation needs to develop a solid program for the
Council to review.
BENEFITS OF PARKS AND RECREATION: A video highlighting the positive impact Parks and
Recreation has on all age levels and all walks of life was viewed.
Councilmember Mann commented that Kent needs a covered outdoor concert stage for local and
national artists to perform. John will pass on this information.
W.R.P.A. PARK BOARD TRAINING: John asked if the councilmembers would be interested in
attending this training specializing in Park Boards and asked that they notify him as soon as possible.
ADDED ITEMS:
West Fenwick: two main irrigation lines were repaired last week that is why there is a large hole in the
ground.
The counters at Russell Road park have bene painted and are going to get one more coat.
Councilmember Bennett sends thanks to Kenny Denhert for improving the landscape at Naden Park RV
area. The park dedication is Friday, September 9 at 12:00 p.m.
Councilmember Bennett asked for a ball park date on restroom installation; there is none as yet.
Meeting adjourned at 5:45 p.m.
0
Week 1
Week 2
Week 3
Week 4
Weeks
Week 8
Week 7
Week 8
Week 9
Week 10
Week 11-'93
Day 1
0
0
q Day 2
0
Day 3
Week 13=93
Week 12-'94
Week 14-'93
Week 13-'94
Week 15-'93
Week 14-'94
Week 15-'93
Week 15-'94
m Day 1
m'
v
� Day
Week 13-'93
Week 17-'94
Week 19-'93
Week 18-'94
Week 20-'93 .
Week 19-'94
I
Week 21=93
Week 20-'94 I
Week 22-'93 L
Week21=94 r
Week 23-'93 1
Week 22-'94 •\
Weak 24-'93
Week 23-'94
\ fA d1 U EA fA 9
Fp N W W
0 S
=r z I
0 pO
7 0 ry
= I
co 0. �0
EJ `G w o W A
N
I
N N
l
� �
a w
l
II II
as
nn�
>o
�n
� � R
wap
♦
awl
i
00
\
to A p
e'f fr
\ fA d1 U EA fA 9
Fp N W W
0 S
=r z I
0 pO
7 0 ry
= I
co 0. �0
EJ `G w o W A
N
CITY OF KENT
GOLF ADVISORY BOARD
MEETING MINUTES
August 24, 1994
Attendees: Harold Perantie, Dan Farmer, Councilman Jim Bennett, Rosemary Mastro, Pete
Petersen, Jim Stone, John Hodgson, R. T. Rasco, Dick Eagon, Patty Greeny and Karen
Anderson
The Meeting was moved up to August 24, 1994 due to conflicts on the scheduled date of August
31, 1994. The meeting was called to order by chair, Harold Perantie at 5:45 p.m.
The Golf Advisory Board recommends the Direct Call In be used over the computer system. A
poll of players indicated a preference to the direct call in. The major reason given was confusion
with the computer and additional calls to complete the tee time. SSMD indicated they prefer the
direct call system.
The Advisory Board recommends the City review the contract with regard to the marshall
program. The Board recommends the City oversee this program (95% City's revenue) with a
chief marshall controlling the marshalls, and working with the starter.
The Ladies Club representative, Patty Greeny, reported the ladies club perfers the computor tee
time system. They also pointed out that heavy play has increased the number of divots and
garbage on the course. The status of the restrooms was also addressed.
The Board also recommends the budget include a capital maintenance category to insure
funding is available for future maintenance needs, e.g. painting, roofing, nets, poles, carpets etc.
Pete Petersen indicated the necessary permits, to start the approved restrooms, will be in hand
in 7 - 10 days. A date for starting will then be addressed.
The master plan was presented by Pete Petersen and John Hodgson for review and discussion.
John Hodgson explained the conceptual plan will be reviewed by the Mens and Ladies club,
Advisory Board, and the Parks Committee. The plan addresses the par 3 course, mini putt,
driving range, and 18 hole course. A feasability study and market study are underway with a
goal of presenting it to the Parks Committee by October.
The SSMD representative Jim Stone indicated two potential new members of SSMD would
bring approximately $500,000 to upgrade the range and mini putt if an agreement between the
City and SSMD could be worked out.
The meeting was adjourned at 7:30 p.m. Next meeting scheduled for September 28, 1994, at
5:45 p.m., Riverbend Conference Room.
. KENT
{(? U Dplease BRENDA
pu OBEn
p v 1 fi 1g9y Council agenda
SE4
CGS 'G� aK
CITY COUNCIL PLANNING COMMITTEE
September 6, 1994 4:00 PM
Committee Members Present
Leona Orr, Chair
Jon Johnson
Tim Clark
Planning Staff
Lin Ball
Betsy Czark
Jim Harris
Margaret Porter
Bob Hutchinson
City Attorney's Office
Laurie Evezich
Other City Staff
Other Guests
packet)
AMENDMENT TO 1994-1996 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT INTERLOCAL
COOPERATION AGREEMENT - (L. Ball)
Human Services Manager, Lin Ball, stated that in June 1993 the City
Council approved the 1994-1996 Community Development Block Grant
(CDBG) Interlocal Cooperation Agreement. Lin explained it is now
necessary to make two amendments in two areas of this agreement.
These changes are as follows:
1. Amend the method by which the CDBG Administrative Setaside is
calculated.
2. Modify the governance structure of the CDBG Consortium,
replacing the Joint policy, Committee (JPC) with a new Joint
Recommendations Committee (JRC).
Lin noted that the change in the method of calculating the
Administrative Setaside does not change the amount of funds that
are available to the City, but allows for a more clear distribution
of administrative costs to the Consortium.
The change in the governance structure gives Cities greater
representation under this new structure. The new structure changes
from the 6 -member elected officials on the JPC, to a 9 -member JRC
composed of either high level staff or elected officials. The
modifications also conform the governance of the CDBG and the HOME
Consortia, creating greater efficiency in governance. It
consolidates the current Joint Policy Committee and the HOME
Project Selection Committee into the new JRC.
CITY.COUNCIL PLANNING COMMITTEE MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 6, 1994
PAGE 2
Staff recommended that the Planning Committee take the following
action:
1. Approval of Amendment No. 1 to the 1994-1996 CDBG Interlocal
Cooperation Agreement dated June 21, 1993.
2. Forward this item to the full City Council for consideration
at its September 20, 1994 meeting, with a recommendation that
the Mayor be authorized to sign the Amendment and forward it
to King County.
Councilmember Johnson MOVED and Councilmember Tim Clark SECONDED a
motion to approve the aforementioned two(2) actions. Motion
carried.
AMENDMENT TO 1994-1996 HOME INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT -
(L. Ball)
Manager Ball stated that in June 1993 the City Council approved the
HOME Interlocal Cooperation Agreement for the years 1994-1996. The
agreement governs the City's participation with the County and
other King County cities in the distribution of federal HOME funds.
It is now necessary to make an amendment to this agreement to
modify the governance structure of the HOME Consortium.
Specifically this amendment eliminates the HOME Project Selection
Committee, replacing it with the Joint Recommendations Committee
(JRC) for funding decisions, and replaces the Joint Policy
Committee with the JRC for HOME program policy decisions. These
modifications conform the governance of the CDBG and HOME
Consortia, creating greater efficiency in governance.
Staff recommended that the Planning Committee take the following
action:
1. Approval of Amendment No. 1 to the 1994-1996 HOME Interlocal
Cooperation Agreement dated June 21, 1993.
2. Forward this item to the full City Council for consideration
at its September 20, 1994 meeting, with a recommendation that
the Mayor be authorized to sign the Amendment and forward it
to King County.
Councilmember Clark MOVED and Councilmember Jon Johnson SECONDED a
motion to approve the aforementioned two(2) actions. Motion
carried.
ti..
CITY COUNCIL PLANNING COMMITTEE MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 6, 1994
PAGE 3
1995 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) PROGRAM - (B. Czark)
Planner Betsy Czark informed the Committee the total proposed 1995
CDBG program is estimated at $462,282. There are two portions to
this program. As reviewed and recommended by staff, the capital
funding portion is $361,459. The majority of these funds are going
to fund the Home Repair Program. This year there is an increase in
the Home Repair budget primarily to purchase a new van. The
program's ten-year old van needs replacement for safety reasons and
for worker efficiency. As recommended by the Human Services
Commission, the public (human) services funding portion is $58,487.
Planning & Administration funds are $42,336. The total funds
available for the 1995 program is an estimate based on the Federal
Entitlement. In order to address potential entitlement changes
resulting from the federal budget adoption later this fall, Betsy
stated the City is required to include a contingency plan in its
proposal.
Staff recommended that the Planning Committee take the following
action:
1. Approve the proposed 1995 Community Development Block Grant
(CDBG) Program and forward for adoption to the full City
Council.
2. Approve the contingency plan for public services dollars as
recommended by the Human Services Commission.
3. Approve option 1, 2, 3, or 4 of the contingency plan for a
capital dollar increase and option 1 or 2 of the contingency
plan for a capital dollar decrease.
4. Schedule a public hearing on September 20, 1994, for the full
City Council to consider adoption of the proposed 1995 CDBG
Program (including the contingency plans).
Councilmember Clark MOVED and Councilmember Jon Johnson SECONDED a
motion to approve the #1, #2, and #4 aforementioned four actions.
Motion carried.
The Committee had further discussion on action item #3. Staff
presented four options of the contingency plan if there is an
increase in capital dollar entitlement funding and presented two
options if there is a decrease in capital dollar entitlement
funding.
If there is an increase in capital dollar entitlement funding,
staff recommended Option #1 which states the entire increase will
be allocated to the Nike Housing Project (KCHA).
If the City receives a decrease in capital dollar entitlement
funds, staff recommended that Option #1 which states that Easter
Seals' funding be decreased by up to $7,425 or to a minimum funding
level of $15,000. If the City receives a decreased entitlement in
CITY COUNCIL PLANNING COMMITTEE MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 6, 1994
PAGE 4
excess of $7,425, staff recommended reducing Housing Unllmited's
funding by a maximum of $5,000, or to a minimum funding level of
$5,000. If the City receives a decreased capital entitlement in
excess of $12,425, the remaining decrease shall be divided equally
between all of the funded capital projects.
Councilmember Johnson MOVED and Councilmember Tim Clark SECONDED a
motion to approve Option #1 of the contingency plan for a capital
dollar increase and to approve Option #1 of the contingency plan
for a capital dollar decrease as recommended by staff. Motion
carried.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT UPDATE - (Fred Satterstrom)
Planning Manager Fred Satterstrom updated the Committee on the
Planning Commission hearings on the proposed Comprehensive Plan.
The first hearing was held July 25, 1994, and the hearing was
continued to August 8th and August 22nd. The hearing was closed on
August 22, 1994. The Commission will have two regular meetings on
September 12th and September 26th on land use. Fred reported the
proposed plan is not an urban centers plan but a mixed use center
approach, which is where centers are dispersed throughout the City.
Fred reported the County -Wide Planning Policies were adopted by the
King County Council on August 22, 1994. Fred briefly gave the
Committee an overview of the County -Wide Planning Policies. He
said this needs to be ratified by 30 per cent of jurisdictions
representing 70 per cent of the population. This item will be
brought to the Committee on September 20, 1994 for further
discussion and action. As soon as a copy of the King County
ordinance is available, copies will be sent to the Council members
for their review. Also, Mr. Satterstrom reported a Land Capacity
Task Force has been created to monitor cities' progress toward
population and employment targets in and out of centers. The
Growth Management Planning Council confirmed 14 urban centers,
including Kent's.
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENTS FOR PROPOSED ANNEXATIONS - (J. Harris
Planning Director Jim Harris reported he will be bringing the
Interlocal Agreement with Federal Way for action by the Committee
regarding proposed boundaries with Federal Way. Harris stated this
subject will be brought back to the Committee either at the meeting
September 20 or October 18, 1994. There will also be other
interlocal agreements with other adjacent cities as follows:
Auburn, Renton, Des Moines, Sea Tac, and Tukwila.
ADDED ITEMS
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 5:20 p.m.
PC0906.MIN
PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE
SEPTEMBER 12, 1994
PRESENT: Jim Bennett Roger Lubovich
Tim Clark Gary Gill
Don Wickstrom Mr & Mrs Rust
ABSENT: Paul Mann
James Street Pedestrian Bridge
Wickstrom said that since the last committee meeting when this item was discussed, we
have essentially we moved the location of the pedestrian bridge design further up
James between Prospect and Lenora and the ramps have been shortened however
even with that, we are still looking at an estimated cost of $525,000. Wickstrom noted
that if Council wanted to pursue this, we would have to determine how to fund it. He
said the reason it is so expensive is, it's like a road construction bridge; the load is very
similar. Clark feels we should do something because of the danger in trying to cross
James. Wickstrom pointed out that the question really is "will it be utilized"? He said
that perhaps we should do some pedestrian counts in the area. He said the only
physical convenience is that it does split the distance between 94th and Central.
Bennett recommended that staff proceed with a pedestrian count.
Charge in Lieu of Assessment for Sewer Service - Meadow Ridge Elementary #26 Area
Wickstrom explained that when the new school was built on 100th Avenue, sewer was
to come in from 264th by way of a new trunk line. He said the trunk line included the
use of an inverted siphon through the canyon area but the analysis showed that the
inverted siphon would not work due to an inadequate upstream service area. He said
the bigger issue was that the 277th corridor is to tie into 274th; we don't know if we will
be cutting the road down and bridging 108th which in that case, the sewer would work,
or will we be on grade. He explained that the higher we go with the Green River
Bridge, the less cutting and the greater the probability of coming in on grade but, the
higher we go with that bridge the greater the cost for the bridge. He said we still have
to balance the least cost option out. Wickstrom further stated that was a big issue so it
was thought best that if they used the system that services the Tudor Square area, than
they could readily extend it and would resolve any further conflicts with our corridor
project. He said however, it does have a capacity problem. To take this additional
area requires that eventually a portion of that trunk line be upsized. He said if we want
these properties to connect in the interim period, they should be paying their share of
that upsizing cost which is about $324,000; this is about 107 acres. Dividing that, this
comes out to about $3,000 per acre. Wickstrom said we have done this on other areas
where we have had sewers that did not have capacity to service them and by instituting
a charge, we allowed development to continue. In that case, we eventually went in and
rebuilt the main and paid for it from sewer revenue. Wickstrom said that essentially,
this is the same type of situation. He further noted that the School District has already
contributed their payment. Wickstrom said that right now there is no sewer to the bulk
of the area; residents who do front on the existing sewer but their property lies within
this expanded area, would not be allowed to connect because the system is not sized
to service them. He said the option is that we will allow them to connect if they pay the
fee which than goes into the fund to rebuild that system. The other option is to have
the City pay for it but the City's general City sewer customers are paying for something
that benefits a specific few. In response to Bennett, Wickstrom said that the $3,000 per
acre equates to about $750 for a normal size lot. Wickstrom noted that connecting to
the sewer is a property owner option unless they are on a failed septic system or some
other health issue.
Committee unanimously recommended authorizing implementing the charge in lieu of
assessment including establishing a separate fund therefor.
Segregation of Assessment #45 - LID #327
Wickstrom explained that this was the LID which improved West Valley Highway in
front of Van Doren's Landing and they want to segregate it into two parcels.
Committee unanimously recommended Council adopt a resolution for segregation of
Assessment #45 in LID 327.
Segregation of Assessment #7 - LID #330
Wickstrom said that this LID was for 64th Avenue in front of Van Doren's Landing and
they want to segregate the assessments into two parcels.
Committee unanimously recommended Council adopt a resolution for segregation of
Assessment #7 in LID #330.
236th Place (Added Item)
Clark stated that the residents on 236th Place at approximately 105th were very upset
about the traffic speed coming down 236th. He said that the residents had two points;
one being, the original plan for the apartment complex on 108th did not call for egress
coming out onto 108th and that all the apartment traffic was to be shifted down towards
240th. He further said that the residents, last year, complained about the amount of
traffic and even questioned whether they could get speed bumps installed and that the
City had allowed them to monitor the traffic with a radar gun. Clark said we have not
initiated the traffic light at 108th & 240th yet and the residents feel that when we do, we
have created another problem with drivers shortcutting that light by driving south on
Benson, taking a left on 236th and down 108th. Wickstrom said that traffic staff will
review this.
ussell Road & Meeker Street (Added Item)
Bennett asked how we could develop the process of installing a traffic light at Russell
and Meeker. Wickstrom said that next year when we put the road capital improvement
budget together, we will look into it.
Sewer Vac Truck (Added Iteml
Bennett asked about the possibility of entering into some kind of inter -local agreement
with other jurisdictions on the use of the sewer vac truck. He said that this is a costly
piece of equipment and for the purposes of getting revenue back from that, it would
then be less costly for us to use. Wickstrom said he will look into it.
Meeting adjourned 5:00 p.m.
PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE
SEPTEMBER 26, 1994
PRESENT: Paul Mann Roger Lubovich
Tim Clark Gary Gill
Don Wickstrom Tom Brubaker
Ed White Mrs Rust
ABSENT: Jim Bennett
Meadow Ridge Elementa[y School Pedestrian Pathway
Wickstrom stated that when the school was developed, the City conditioned that they
widen the shoulder on 108th from 264th to the school site and they have given us the
money to do that. He said the condition was to widen the shoulder 5 feet however we
were going to widen it to 8 feet. The residents of Tudor Square felt we should look at an
alternative which we did and that is the 110th Ave alignment. Wickstrom said the cost of
this alignment, plus widening between 271 st and 269th along 108th (because there are
still some kids choosing to walk that way or off hours) is a total of about $90,000. He said
just to widen 108th was about $65,000; we have bids out and because of the clay material
there, we need to improve this during decent weather. Wickstrom said we met with the
residents of Tudor Square and they are in favor of the 110th alignment which, however,
may involve condemnation. He said we have an existing 15 foot paved maintenance road
to a sewer manhole on one of the lots in Tudor Square and to the south of that, which
abuts 271 st cul-de-sac there is an existing detention pond that we were going to run a trail
thru; south on 110th we would connect a private road with the existing 110th with a trail;
on 274th we have widened the south shoulder up to the English property, which we own,
and the kids could go thru the driveway to the back of the school. He said the school still
needs to make a decision on fencing their wetponds. He said this seems to be the most
favored route. Wickstrom again noted that there could be a possible condemnation with
this alternative. He said what the City is proposing regarding the 15 foot paved path is to
cutout 10 feet of asphalt, replace it with lawn, and install a parallel 6 foot wood fence. He
said we would then do our maintenance coming in from the south, thru our detention pond
area. Wickstrom said that the 110th route is the way the citizens want to go.
Wickstrom stated that in talking with Jim Bennett that Bennett favors the 110th alignment.
He also noted that the monies would come from the sidewalk fund.
Dean Radford, a resident of 27010 111th PI S.E., stated that the neighbors were
concerned that the School District would want to resume bussing their children once that
Pathway is finished along 108th. Wickstrom stated that under the terms of the mitigation
the School District paid for, they said they would bus children to the school until the
improvements along 108th were made. Radford made reference to a contract and
Wickstrom noted that this refers to the City asking the School District to amend the
obligation so that we could use their money to build parts of this path, plus using our own
money. He said that the intent is that we would build it all at once including the piece on
108th; the path on 110th would be opened at the same time the shoulder widening is done
on 108th and at that point the bussing would end. Wickstrom said the only delay could
occur during condemnation which could take up to six months. In response to Brubaker,
Wickstrom stated that during the time of condemnation; as long as the improvements are
not built, the bussing will continue. Radford requested that this bussing situation be put
in writing. Lubovich suggested that a letter of understanding be prepared with both
parties signing.
Committee unanimously agreed that contingent upon the letter of understanding being
written by Public Works to the School District, authorize the construction of 110th walkway
for Meadow Ridge Elementary.
Street Use Ordinance
Lubovich stated that the Mayor is concerned about the structures we have had in the city
where buildings get moved in and situated on lots without being permanently placed. He
said that the conditioning of moving a house thru the City requires a street use permit, and
Lubovich recommended conditioning that permit issuance upon obtaining a building permit
for siting the building before it is moved. Lubovich stated that in talking with Jim Bennett,
Bennett had some concerns about this in that he felt we may be over -regulating.
Committee unanimously recommended approval of the suggested changes to the Street
Use Ordinance.
4pticom System
Wickstrom explained that Opticom is what gives preemption status to our fire vehicles on
emergency responses and it works off a strobe light system and what we presently have
is very antiquated. We have been having problems with the system over the years and
now we have an opportunity to get a trade-in as a promotional deal with 3M Company,
which would save the City about $75,000. He said since this needs to be done, we should
do it now instead of waiting thru the'95 budget cycle. He said, if we wait the trade-in deal
won't be there and it will cost us more money. He said we have some money in completed
street projects that we want to reallocate to do this. Clark asked, if the current system is
triggered by other types of vehicles; is there any guarantee that the new system will not
be volatile to that? White explained that it will go to a protection system and the strobe will
only pick up certain patterns.
Committee unanimously recommended implementing the project and establishing the fund
as explained. Bennett concurred with this recommendation by phone, with Wickstrom.