HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Meeting - Council - Agenda - 08/03/1993 City of Kent
City Council Meeting
m
Agenda
p»
a,
CITY OF
�4
o-
a .'
w:
a, p Mayor Dan Kelleher
Council Members
Judy Woods, President
Jim Bennett Paul Mann
Christi Houser Leona Orr
Jon Johnson Jim White
e�
August 3, 1993
'�' Office of the City Clerk
CITY OF L�LSV
2 SUMMARY AGENDA
_ KENT CITY COUNCIL MEETING
August 3 , 1993
Council Chambers
7 : 0 0 p.m.
MAYOR: Dan Kelleher COUNCILMEMBERS: Judy Woods, President
Jim Bennett Christi Houser Jon Johnson
Paul Mann Leona Orr Jim White
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
1. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
-A. Employee of the Month
B. Regional Justice Center Update
2 . PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Six Year Transportation Improvement Program - Resolution
B. 1994-1999 Capital Improvement Program
3 . CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Approval of Minutes
B. Approval of Bills
C. Street Vacation - Mar Del - Set Hearing Date - Resolution
D. Commute Trip Reduction Program - Approval
E. High Capacity Transportation Grant - Acceptance
F. Central Avenue & Pioneer Street Pedestrian Signal Grant -
Acceptance
G. Royal Woods Manor - Bill of Sale
H. Human Services Commission Appointments
I. Downtown Partnership Funding, 1993
J. School Security Program - Budget Change
K. Police/Fire Surveillance Equipment Purchase
L. Capital and Maintenance Funding for Golf Complex
4 . OTHER BUSINESS
A. Sewerage Bonds Financing - Bond Ordinance and Purchase
Contract
B. 196th St. Corridor Bridge Over Mill Creek Demolition -
Emergency Findings and Resolution
5. BIDS
-A. North 4th Avenue Street Rebuild
B. Sewer & Catch Basin Cleaner
6 . CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS
EXECUTIVE SESSION - Litigation and Labor Negotiations
7 . REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
NOTE: A copy of the full agenda packet is available for perusal in
the City Clerk ' s Office and the Kent Library.
An explanation of the agenda format is given on the back of
this page.
PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
Citizens wishing to address the Council will, at this time,
make known the subject of interest, so all may be properly
heard.
A) Employee of the Month
B) Regional Justice Center Update
Kent City Council Meeting
Date August 3 , 1993
Category Public Hearings
1. SUBJECT: SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: The Public Works Department has pre-
sented its proposed annual Six Year Transportation Improvement
Program to the Public Works Committee. This year' s program is
similar to last years in that staff has prepared an interim
project listing for the purpose of securing ISTEA and TIB
funding.
3 . EXHIBITS: Public Works Director Memo, Public Works minutes,
1994-1999 Project Listing and Resolution
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (2-0)
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
OPEN HEARING: ' ,
PUBLIC INPUT:
CLOSE HEARING: bL ku 6 l
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember Vj% O t moves, Councilmember 21_T seconds
Resolution No. be adopted authorizing the Six Year
Transportation Improvement Program.
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 2A
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
July 15, 1993
TO: Public WorksRrector
ittee
FROM: Don Wickstro of Public Works
-RE: 1994 - 1999 Six Year TIP
The Public Works Department is once again presenting it ' s proposed
annual Six Year Transportation Improvement Program as required by
RCW 35 . 77 . 010 and RCW 36 . 81. 121 and the Growth Management Act.
This year' s program is similar to last years in that staff has
prepared an interim project listing for the purpose of securing
ISTEA and TIB funding. A more comprehensive project listing will
be submitted as part of the City ' s Comprehensive Transportation
Plan element.
ACTION: Recommend adoption of resolution authorizing the Six Year
Transportation Improvement Program.
CI"IY OF KENt, WASIIINGTON
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT BUDGET
1994 TI I11OUGI-1 1999 PROJi?C[' I.IS11NG
FIRST YEAR
ANNUAL ELEMENT 1994
1 South 272nd/ 277th Street Corridor Project -- Auburn Way to Kent-Kangley Road
2 South 196th/ 200th Street Corridor Project - Orillia Road to West Valley Highway
3 South 192nd/ 196th Street Corridor Project -- East Valley Highway to West Valley
Highway
4 METRO Park and Ride -- Kent-Des Moines Road at Interstate 5
5 Canyon Drive -- Pedestrian and Bike Lane Improvements
6 Reith Road/Meeker Street at Kent-Des Moines Road Intersection Improvements
7 72nd Avenue South at South 212th Street Intersection Improvements
8 South 212th Street -- West Valley Highway to SR 167 H.O.V. lanes
9 Commute Trip Reduction
10 Valley Signal Coordination
11 James Street Safety Improvements
12 VMS ( Vehicle Monitoring System ) Upgrade
13 Neighborhood Traffic Control Program
14 West Valley Highway -- South 180th Street to South_189th Street
15 West Meeker Street -- SR 516 to West Valley Highway
16 City-wide Pedestrian and Bicycle Facility Improvements
17 METRO Park and Ride Bicycle Lockers -- Downtown Park and Ride
18 Pacific Highway South -- Kent-Des Moines Road ( SR 516 ) to South 240th Street
19 Pacific Highway South -- South 240th Street to South 252nd Street
20 James Street -- Pavement Reconstruction from East Valley Highway to West Valley
Highway
21 Central Avenue -- Pavement Reconstruction from Willis Street to Green River
Bridge
22 East Valley Highway— Pavement Reconstruction from South 192nd Street to South
212th Street
23 Washington Avenue ( SR 181 ) West Meeker Street to Kent-Des Moines Road
( SR 516 )
SECOND/ THIRD YEAR 1995 - 1996
24 James Street at Central Avenue Intersection Improvements
25 Kent-Kangley Road at lllth Avenue Southeast Intersection Improvements
26 Smith Street at 4th Avenue Intersection Improvements
27 72nd Avenue South -- South 194th Street to South 196th Street
28 Southeast 256th Street -- Kent-Kangley Road ( SR 516 ) to 116th Avenue SE
29 64th Avenue South -- South 216th Street to South 226th Street
30 Willis Street at 4th Avenue Signal Modifications ( 1996 )
31 Lind Avenue -- South 180th Street to East Valley Highway
CI"IY OF KENT, WASI IING"ION
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT BUDGIE I'
199� THROUGH 1999 PROJI{CI' LISTING
SECOND/ THIRD YEAR 1995 - 1996 (_Continued_
32 South 212th Street-- Pavement Reconstruction from 42nd Avenue South to Green
River Bridge
33 Lincoln Avenue at James Street Traffic Signal ( METRO )
FOURTH/ FI—,FH/ SIX FH YEARS 1997_1998 1999
33 East Valley Highway ( 84th Avenue South ) -- South 212th Street to SR 167
34 72nd Avenue South -- South 1961h Street to South 200th Street
35 South 224th/ 228th Street Corridor Project
• Military Road to 54th Avenue South,
• Military Road -- South 228th Street to Kent-Des Moines Road
36 South 192nd/ 196th Street Corridor Project -- East Valley Highway to 92nd Avenue
South
37 Central Avenue at Smith Street Intersection Improvements
38 94th Avenue South — Canyon Drive to James Street
39 South 248th Street -- 94th Avenue South to I I6th Avenue Southeast
40 South 240th Street at 104th Avenue Southeast Acceleration Lanes
41 Burlington Northern Railroad Grade Separations-- Willis Street, James Street, South
228th Street, South 212th Street
42 Washington Avenue ( SR 181 ) James Street to West Meeker Street
controlling the land use designation in SeaTac was discussed with
respect to high density apartments in that area . Brubaker said it
was previously discussed that we cannot contract away the rights of
the SeaTac City Council . Brubaker said that possibly we could, as
a contractural condition of extending service, not try to control
the land use designation but control amount of flow or amount of
residences to be served. He said it would then be incumbent on the
city of SeaTac. White said that he is not sure whether we have the
right to tell another city what they do with their land use. He
further said that citizens in that city are paying for Metro in one
way or another so he questions why we are blocking them.
Johnson asked if we could grant a sewer extension and limit the
size of the capacity of the line . Wickstrom again stated that it
would be SeaTac ' s sewer and their forcF main, but would be in our
public right of way.
Committee directed staff to address the problem and come back to
the Committee with a workable recommendation.
Mar-Del Investment Street Vacation
Wickstrom said that this is a petition to vacate a piece of
property and as such requires a public hearing. He requested that
the hearing date be set for September 7th.
Committee unanimously recommended setting the public hearing for
September 7th.
DT. I .P. - Presentation of Projects
Referring to the 194 through 199 project listing, Wickstrom said
that we did make a lot of changes in the first year, indicating on
a wall map which of the projects that had been rearranged. In
response to White ' s question on the time-line on the Reith Rd. &
Meeker St. widening project, Wickstrom said we have a proposal with
the state and are waiting for them to buy off on our proposal .
Wickstrom explained that one of the additions made to the first
year ' s program was changing Canyon Drive to a Pedestrian and Bike
Lane project thinking we would probably get a better chance for a
grant. However, now the Federal money has been dictated and we are
not getting any money for that project .
White asked Wickstrom if a traffic signal at Russell Rd. & Meeker
St. "fits in" with this category of projects. Wickstrom stated
that it will be in one of our six year T. I . P. s.
Wickstrom said that we will have to do some adjusting in order to
move our 212th St. project up. He said we have submitted for a
grant application and it looks like we will get some money. In
response to White ' s question on grade separation, Wickstrom said we
put that in the list to get some interest from it. He said that
2
there is $1 billion dollars of fedora] money around and only five
systems in the U. S . that it can be spent on . White asked if the
Regional Transit I:uthority is go_ir-ig to have input on that .
Wickstrom said he thinks it would go fc,r grade separations and its
improving the rail for high speed trains running from Eugene,
Oregon to Vancouver B. C. Wickstrom saicl they want to get it above
125 mph and to do this they need grade ,eparations . Wickstrom said
that knowing the money is out there and a]-so we may not see it in
six years, we need to let people know we need some .
In response to White ' s question on S . � 6th between 104th & 116th,
Wickstrom said that the County has received a grant and we are
waiting for them to make the improvement . Then we will be in a
better position to get a grant from ` JB to fund it.
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the
City of Kent, Washington, adopting the 1994-
1999 Six Year Transportation Improvement Plan.
WHEREAS, after proper notice, the City Council of the
City of Kent held a public hearing at the regular meeting of the
City Council held at 7 : 00 p.m. on July 20, 1993 , to consider public
testimony on the proposed Transportation Improvement Plan for the
City and having considered public testimony to the Plan; NOW,
THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The 1994 through 1999 Six Year Transportation
Improvement Plan, as set forth in the exhibit attached hereto and
herewith filed with the City Clerk, is hereby adopted.
Passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Kent, Washington this day of , 1993 .
Concurred in by the Mayor of the City of Kent, this
day of 1993 .
DAN KELLEHER, MAYOR
ATTEST:
BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ROGER A. LUBOVICH, CITY ATTORNEY
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of
Resolution No. passed by the city Council of the City of
Kent, Washington, the day of _ 1993 .
(SEAL)
BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK
sixyear.res
2
Kent City Council Meeting
Date August 3 , 1993
Category Public Hearings
1 . SUBJECT: 1994-1999 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
T-
F
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: -
This year ' s program
focuses on the 1994 component,, Future years will be more
clearly defined following completion of the City ' s Capital
Facilities Plan as a required component of the Growth
Management Act. The 1994 requests have been prioritized by q'
City Council and reviewed by the Council ' s Budget Committee.
MemoSfrom various departments have been ire clarifying or
adjusting project requests.
�e3fleiYt -neeelsa are eneour-aged and -
ax--
3 . EXHIBITS: Capital projects listing as prioritized by Council
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Budget Committee 3-0
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS: 1994 CIP fund plus other capital funding
OPEN HEARING:
PUBLIC INPUT: 14)
CLOSE HEARING:
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember MOVE t-O r seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 2B
MILLER,MAYENE / KENT70/FN - HPDesk print.
-----------------------------------------
S_ ,,ject: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN UPDATE
Creator: Mayene MILLER / KENT70/FN Dated: 07/23/93 at 1227 .
TO: BUDGET COMMITTEE
THE ATTACHED PACKET OF INFORMATION INCLUDES :
1. CALENDAR AND UPDATED FINANCIAL PAGES (CHANGES FROM DEPARTMENTS
ARE NOTED)
2 . MEMO FROM LIN BALL REGARDING THE HOUSING FOR HOMELESS MEN, MEMO FROM
LORI HOGAN REGARDING KENT COMMONS AIR CONDITIONING, MEMO FROM DON
WICKSTROM REGARDING A TIB GRANT FOR 212TH AND A CHANGE IN STREET
PROJECT PRIORITIES .
3 . DRAFT GOLF COURSE CAPITAL PLAN SHOWING SOME CAPITAL ITEMS THAT WILL
BE PRIORITIZED BY THE GOLF ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND THE PARK DEPARTMENT
IN THE FALL OF 1993 . ALSO A LISTING OF 1993 ITEMS THAT WERE JUST APPROVED
TO BE FUNDED FROM A PORTION OF THE GOLF BUY-OUT FUNDS .
4 . DRAFT FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FIRE VEHICLES SHOWING THE TOP 10 ITEMS . THIS IS A
DRAFT PLAN THAT IS INTENDED TO FOCUS ON 1994 AND DEMONSTRATE FUNDING
NECESSARY TO REPLACE A 1974 FIRE TRUCK AND A 1985 ENGINE AIR TRUCK IN 1994
AND TO APPROVE ORDERING AN AERIAL FIRE TRUCK IN 1994 TO PAID FOR IN 1995.
A $300 , 000 OPERATING RATES IS SCHEDULED TO BEGIN IN THE GENERAL FUND
IN 1994 . A FUTURE FIRE EQUIPMENT FUNDING PLAN WILL BE DEVELOPED AS PART OF
THE CAPITAL FACILITY PORTION OF THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT ACT. THIS IS EXPECTED
TO BE COMPLETED BY SPRING OF 1994 IN TIME TO BE INCLUDED IN THE NEXT YEARS
ANNUAL BUDGET.
THIS MEETING IS BEING HELD TO RECEIVE PUBLIC INPUT ON THE 1994-1999 CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PLAN, WITH FOCUS ON THE 1994 PORTION. A FULL UPDATE OF THE CAPITAL
PLAN IS SCHEDULED FOR 1994 AFTER COMPLETION OF THE CAPITAL FACILITY PORTION OF
THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IN THE SPRING. CITY DEPARTMENT HEADS AND STAFF
WILL BE PRESENT TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THEIR PROJECTS .
I WANT TO TAKE THIS OPPORTUNITY TO THANK COUNCIL, THE BUDGET COMMITTEE, EACH
DEPARTMENT HEAD AND THEIR STAFF AND MY STAFF FOR ALL OF THEIR COOPERATION AND
HARD WORK IN HELPING PUT TOGETHER THIS CIP PLAN.
1994 - 1999 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
CALENDAR OF EVENTS
MEET WITH PLANNING TO DISCUSS CIP, COORDINATION 2/01/93
DISTRIBUTE CALENDAR, PROJECT DESCRIPTION SHEETS AND SUMMARIES 2/08/93
DEPARTMENTS PREPARE REVISED CIP SUMMARY FOR COUNCIL RETREAT 2/16/93
DISCUSS CALENDAR AND MINI-UPDATE WITH BUDGET COMMITTEE 2/22/93
DISCUSS CIP PROCESS WITH COUNCIL AT RETREAT 2/26/93
*DEPARTMENTS SUBMIT PROJECT DESCRIPTION SHEETS WITH CHANGES 3/19/93-
.5/14/93
COUNCIL WORKSHOP; REVIEW OF FUNDING OPTIONS , PRESENTATIONS BY 5/18/93
DEPARTMENTS, COUNCIL PRIORITIZATION OF PROJECVS
*FINANCE PREPARES 6-YEAR REVENUE/FINANCIAL PLAN AND DRAFT CIP, 5/19/93-
AND REVIEWS PROJECT - DESCRIPTION SHEETS WITH FLA.NNING FOR GROWTH 6/23/93
MANAGEMENT CONCURRENCY
*PRESENT DRAFT CIP TO BUDGET COMMITTEE 6/28/93
*PUBLIC HEARING - COUNCIL MEETING 7/20/93
*PRESENT BALANCED 1994 - 1999 CIP TO BUDGET COMMITTEE FOR THEIR 7/26/93
FOR THEIR FINAL INPUT AND CHANCES
*PUBLIC HEARING - COUNCIL MEETING 8/3/93 �
*ADOPT UPDATED 1994 - 1999 CIP 8/17/93
Approximate Annual Amount Available
Street Fund
Corridors---------------------------------------------------S1 ,600,000
Arterials-------------------------------=---------------------$300,000
Signals, Sidewalks and Miscellaneous-----------------= 5300,000
Capital Improvement Fund----------------- ---------------------51 ,500,000
Criminal Justice Fund-------------------- ------------------------SIOO,000
*800 MHZ & MDT Sale---------------------------------------------$1 , 172,000
Water, Sewer, Drainage & Golf Funds-----------------------to be determined
Indicates date revision or added item.
93CIPCAL
CITY OF KENT EXHIBIT H
CURRENT BUDGET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST June 3C, 1993
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND
1993
-----------------------------
Adjusted Adjustments Estimated Preliminary
Budget Fav (Unfav) Actual Forecast
------------------------ ---------------------------------------- ------------
REVENUES
Taxes:
Sales & Use Tax 2,760,047 269,866 * 3,029,913 1 2,865,163
Real Estate Excise 383,320 . 73,538 ' 456,853 2 469,193 2.7%
Interest 70,135 70,135 70,135
Miscellaneous Revenue 27,989 27,989 30,519
TOTAL REVENUES 3,241,491 343,404 3,594,895 3,435,010
OTHER FINANCIAL SOURCES:
Closed Projects 255,062 (90,C00)- 165,062 3
EXPENDITURES (TRANSFERS)
Debt Service 2,150,089 2,150,089 2,147,044
Other Capital Projects:
City Hall. Remodel 130,000 730,000
Emergency Power/Coord. Center 244,000 244,000
Sidewalk Repair 300,000 " 300,000
ADA Modifications 115,000 115,000 -
Reserve for Fire Vehicles 200,000 230,000
Municipal Court (250,000) 250,000
Growth Mgt Facility Plan (25,000) 26,000
TOTAL EXPENDITURES (TRANSFERS) 3,139,089 (276,000) 3,415,089 2,147,044
INCR`e ASE (DECREASE) IN FUND BALANCE 357,464 (22,596) 334,868 1,237,966 w
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 246,604 139,331 ' 385,935 720,803
ENDING FUND BALANCE
Reserved For Capital Expenditures 450.,000 450,000 450,000
Unreserved: 154,068 116,735 270,803 1,558,769
Total Ending Fund Balance 604,068 116,735 720,803 2,008,769
* Changes from last month
1) 7/12 of projected variance plus $164,750 from sales tax settlements.
2) Per current year's trend to date.
3) Library settlement S53,000, other closed project corrections.
CDC CIP9301.ua! 23-Jul-93
1994 CIP.PRICRITI`cS
4 CAPITAL IFPRGVEl SIT PROCRAM (J,I
REO�•t•F`DEO
------------------
DEPT RANK 1974 CiP OTHER
FI.PD DE'T RA1+K AVE PROJ TITLE REa.EST FUDA FURS RLCrT M-MITTrr DIS01SS1CN
CAPITAL IPPR0Jc7•ENT R-W /' 1,021
15 PD 01 1.1 IIS01 Police Carpiter Upgrade_ 50 Will be '9$fre?ast fran seized assets
15 PO; 02 1.1.INEW correctic s Major Paintarance Upgrade 35 35 CrimiraL JLstice P.rds
15 IS 01 1 1.4 IC6 GIS Ertrsrereits 80 K
15 PCS 05 2.2 IN�W Public Building Paintearce 100 1C0
15 P..CST 01 I 2.3 INEW sidz�zlks Rehabilitatim 275 275 year
15 PK 02 2.8 I01 Senior Activity CEnter/Res Ctr Bps 40 40
15 Is 02 I 3.1 IC4 Ciywice Persc L Carputer Lp:grads 61 F%rd with ircreas�d 6eparnr-at rates
15 ACtt 02 1 3.3 INFV In City Tra-5it S 75 S--_xd year
15 PK G3 I 3.6 I07 Park Ard Recra,tim Cap PtaVU,xate 4C =7 Red.red / d.plioatim with GvA facility plan
15 PL 03 I 3.6 JG3 EIS fcr Grath FS_:t 50 4C Reim / d. Licatim wish CIA failiy plan
- 15 IS C6 1 3.6 1NZ4 Dcc n t IFegin5 E:Ycsim 75 73
15 IS C4 1 3.7 I07 New a, Llca,ic5: cashierirg/Pennittirg 75 r
15 PCB 07 1 4.3 1974 Ca , ter Rail Faility iCO 21, Defer atL h,t miror amnt fcr
15 PCB 1 4.3 I �p fcr fire ea ip�.-t
15 PL Oi I 4-6 I01 Trdsitimal Hasirg Fcr Simte Pin 150 �a"'� 360 Grant ftr6 alresdy canittE�E S:LO,4CO
5 FC8 10 1 4.6 IC4 city Hall Atann Systa
15 PK ; 01 - 4.6 ILa .- Ccr s Air Caditimirg 1c•'• 0
15 IS 05 1 5.1 IO2 Centel CarFuter Systsn Ert'z�r-s 7 P.rd with incre--,ad 6�-t rz,�
15 IS C3 5.1 IC5 P:rastim✓Lczal-Ar�-�4'et•..orics SJ 25 Ez;in exparsim
15 FR 14 5.1 IO2 En=r-=y Paer fcr T. Fire Statics 14C Fire rc=,e-- s 19�6 -
15 PK C8 1 5.9 ICo Ply Area Hodernizatim 50 `
15 LAW O1 1 6.1 101 Pnicipal Cart GO F.ro=d 19s3
15 FR 09 1 6.4 124 Seal Grating 33 30 �OT
15 FR 01 1 6.6 107 * Hearing Prot./A;-,-rates Intercarhbmirg E2 82 Safety Iss.e. Sec fcr erer..n-y"�ver.(F9T)
15 FR 05 1 6.6 109 Vehicle Plaint. Service Vehicle Replace. 50 F:rd with futtr-e rates
15 FR 08 6.6 �NC4 Paint Exterior of Statics 8 Mc Fa_- 50 Evaluate GvA facility plan
15 PK G4 I 6.7 ItZW Tee-✓Yalth Center (So-d '94) Dot Service tzgirs in 95 if iss: in 94.
15 PCB CO __ I 6.9 INE'V Dow)'a Parking Garoce - Smith 4,550 % Yayo will reco-.nn'd s:-'0 S75,CCO.
15 PCB 03 I 6.9 INEd Dccntan Parking Garage - TitLs 1,3i5 see aave -
15 FR C4 I 6.9 ICS Fire Tux r &m Pray 4_0 L'se 800 PHZ fu-� in 19
15 FR 02 1 . 6.9 I04 a 1974 Rnp<r Repla emnt 371 37i Set Lp Fire Ecpip Replace. Fu-d (sea attach)
15 FR 03 I 7.1 111 a 1985 Engine/Aid Replacement 371 24C 131 Set tD Fire Earip Replace. FLrd (see attar-))
15 PCB C I 7.3 NEW HistoricaL Building Rer�-rratim 1�
15 FN I 7.4 NEW Funitu-e for City Hall 1C0
15 PL 02 1 7.6 IC2 Critical Arm Acqjisitim 7W
15 FR C6 I 7.6 123 Aperetus Rapp And Sr ity Fe irg 50 12 Se:ri y fence 1994 per Norm.
15 PK 10 I 7.9 106 Patching Grant Funs 150
15 Pai 04 I 8.0 INEW Clock Tc,er and Fantain 50
15 PK 05 I 8.0 INEW Rivenalk Park Dev. ('94)
15 PCB 09 I 8.0 JC2 City Halt Caq:is Gasr'ator Needs 15 1993 Regrst
15 FR 10 1 8.3 103 a Replace 1981 Aerial Truck (Order 19; ) Set Lp Fire Equip Replace- Fud (see attar )
15 PK 09 1 8.4 109 Up'bte Parks To Red Risks 40 CBG
15 PD 05 1 8.7 103 "Lardtrak" GIS Interface To Police Carp.
15 FR 07 I 8.7 110 * Fire Carp.fter Egjip ent And Software
15 FR 13 8-7 112 * Minitor Pagers
15 FR 15 8-7 1W4 Replace Chassis Am- 740
15 FR • 16 1 8.7 I06 Apparatus Hoist - Apparaas Paint. Bldg
5 FR 17 I 8.7 118 &rergarcy Cooed- Ctr Cr raticraL Egjio
15 FR 18 8-7 114 Control Of Traffic For Ererg. Resv'se
15 FR 19 I 8.7 115 ApperatLs Maintere BLdg - Steam CL�
15 FR 20 1 8.7 1NEllL a Replace two (2) Ptn¢.s
C.i LIST014.hC! 16-Ju1-7�
1WA CIP PRICRITIES
1994 CAPITAL IFPRW:71ENT PROCRCM
------------------
DEPT RNX 1994 C;P OTH.F.R
Rm DEPT RANK AVE PRCU TITLE REa-EST F.TD FLUDS RLGET C3,HIT = DISC1SSiCN
15 FR 21 I 8.7 113 2 Aerial Larder Tnnk
15 FR 22 1 8.7 121 Fire Purp Testing Pit
15 FR 23 I 8.7 I�Ed Paint Trrg Grrd Btd�-,.
15 FR 24 1 8.7 117 Training System - Fire And PoliC'/Fire
15 FR 26 I 8.7 IZ2 Paint Booth
15 FR 27 I 8.7 119 Apperatn.s Maintff-a a Service Vehicle -
15 FR 11 I 8.9 I05 Building Ard Gro.rrs Nainte� Bldg
15 FR 12 1 8.9 I20 hUti-Csalty Incident Trailer
15 FR 31 1 8.9 116 Camzrd Vehicle
15 F0 04 I 9.0 IC6 Edicm Digital Photo Insgery Systen
15 FK 06 I 9.0 112 East Hill Paris A,--q ('94) + Dev.
15 FK 07 I 9.1 132 Lk-per Hill Creek Cdrym Acq.('94)
15 FR 25 I 9.3 I1.'=',1 Classro=Ad3itim to Training Center
15 PO 03 I 10.0 IO2 Fireamr Training SiruLator 60 Use FCT
15 P..CSL G5 I 10.0 113 Exzar d P�6 is 4kr-ks U&e Of Shcp
15 IS 07 1 10.0 113 Cperatia-al Llrra±s
15 Is 08 I 10.0 108 A:mcmatic Phare Call Distri Luticn Systen
15 IS 09 I 10.0 I03 Trainirg/7estirg Facility: Start-Lp
15 IS 10 i 10.0 111 Upgrading Tetedi-e Voice Pro.-es m
15 F', 11 I 10.0 IIzi Grarth vgt Matcnirg
15 IS 11 I 10.6 IIkW Co=icaticn O. ra.:l Fibs Cptic CzLtl
15 FK 12 I 10.0 123 Vast Hill Paris Easerents / Dev
15 IS 12 I 10.0 110 Key Te(6p' , Systen Rptocer t
15 FK 13 I 10.0 129 First A,F-iz Plaza
_ -
15 13 13 I 10.0 112 Telepna-e Switch Ltxr /Ersim
15 FK 14 I 10.0 116 Park F'ainter>ance Emip=t
15 IS 14 I 10.0 114 Ean=_rq y Baek-p For Central Cmp{ter
15 PK 15 1 10.0 146 Valley &sines Parts
15 FK 16 1 10.0 103 Park Maintere� 5-nps ReTor!eL
15 PK 17 I 10.0 128 Add Parklrg/Picnic Ares At Resor Ctr
15 FK 18 1 10.0 1k` 1996 Bond Iss e
15 F'K 18 I 10-0 126 Riverfront Ac:q./Dev.-
15 FK 18 I 10.0 I20 Nei¢tnrha-d Parrs
15 PK 18 I 10.0 Ill Athletic Camplex
15 PK 18 1 10-0 134 East Hill Crnmni ty Center
15 PK 18 I 10.0 I05 Riverview Park
15 PK 18 I 10..0 1 EW Vast Hill Ccmnnity Ctr.
15 PK 18 I 10.0 I10 Cultral/Per-forming Arts center
15 PK 19 1 10.0 IIEN Krmisch Note Due 1971 Park Dev
15 PK 20 1 10.0 143 Lake Ferwick Park IrcproveTtnts
15 PK 21 1 10-0 124, Green River Corridor Rest.mms
15 PK Z2 1 10.0 113 Child Day Care Center (198)
15 PK 23 I 10.0 125 Picnic Shelters
15 PK 24 I 10.0 IFr W Tu:br- Sc?-ere Park Dev.
15 PK 25 I 10.0 139 C.mTres Playfield Irrigation Systen
15 PK 26 1 10.0 136 Hill Creek Carym DeveLcpTsnt
15 FK 27 I 10.0 115 Green River Corridor Parking Lot
15 PK 28 I 10.0 138 Vast Fen+ick - Pave Paricing Lot
15 PK 29 1 10.0 I40 AoWire Amrican Legim Hall
-------------------------
10,548 1,549 1,021
C= LIST014,L.O! 16-Ju1-9j
1954 CIP FRICRI7IE5
/94 CAPITAL IKIRCN/a M MO-';M
RECCM-eDED
-----------------
DEPT RANK 19A CIP MER
FI.TD DEPT RANK AVE PR0.1 TITLE .., REa-EST FUD FLDDS 9.DGET 02bMI7Tr= DISCL 1CN
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
STREEEET FLDD 2,741
11 FxM 01 I 7.4 101 Corridor Inprwe`ent Frd 1,982 1,sFz
11 MIG 02 1 7.4 122 Janes St & Central Ave Right Tern Lare 350 3sa
11 PGEIG 03 I 7.5 116 72rd Ave& S. 212th Street 100 100
1l PSIG C4 I 7.6 124 Kent-Kargle/SR516/111th Sig. Intercm_ 15 15
11 P.CCR 05 I 10.0 128 72Nd Averxs 196Th-1947h Block
11 P.C'CR 07 I 10.0 117 Green River Vat Ley Trwrs t. Ben Dis 0 T\4*'r \\ C e\ -
11 P.CLR 10 I 10.0 I37 212Th Street C.'.M - SR167)
11 P DZR 12 I 10.0 129 Janes Street (94th Ave - Jasm Ave)
11 PZM 13 I 10.0 131 west Valle/High,.y (180th 189th SO
11 P.CCR 14 I 10.0 135 94th (Cwym - Jags)
11 PXM 17 I 10.0 139 84th Widening (212t1 - SR167)
11 P.. 19 10.0 121 Lird Avcrue (133th - ErH)
11 P%,CST C6 10.0 111 Neig.torharJ Traffic Control Pro3rm
11 PSIG 08 I 10.0 132 Central Ave/Smith St Interscst Irrprrne
11 PSIG 09 I 10.0 134 Janes & 1C4th A.�leratim Lam .
11 PSIG 11 I 10.0 133 4th Ave & G'illis InL:� IrrFroye:en:
11 PSIG 15 I 10.0 136 SE 248ch St - 94t� Aw To 116th Avb
11 PSIG 16 I 10.0 123 . Smith & 4th Ava -
11 PSIG 18 10.0 I33 Lir=ln A �rrr�-, Street Sig-at
...............
------------- ---------
2,"7 2,r.7
LATER FLU)
41 WER 01 I 8.7 108 Tacna Intertie - 1,253 1,�-3
41 WATER 02 I 8.9 11Ew Guiterscn Street Res . it Restcratim 2C0 20J
41 LATER C3 I 9.0 110 Miscella-eas lRter Irzprc,F is 225 23
41 WER 04 I 9.3 Ik-W %Jell Head Protection Pr'o3ran IQ IQ
41 WER 05 I 10.0 113 Egad PuS is %kt'cs Use Cf Shcp
41 IATER 05 I 10.0 Ill IM x xd Project
1 820 1,820
,F. ERAGE FL.DD 4,197
44 PSTM 01 I 8.7 IC/. t1Lid 306/Vaile/Detection 919 919
44 P.1ST14 02 I 8.7 IC5 Garrison Creek Flea.'Ard Erosion 958 958
44 PSTM 03 I 8.7 IC6 Mill Creek Fly Ard Erosion Control 2S6 226
44 PSTM 04 I 8.7 I1Z Horseshoe Acres Storm Pulp Station 287 2S0
44 PSi1d 11 I 8.7 Ill Mill Ere& Cleazp 63 63
44 SE4.ER 01 I 9.0 106 Misceltar-ea-s Seszr Replace is 162 162
44 SCFa C3 I 9.3 112 5kylire Park Serer- Interceptor 175 175
44 PSTM 05 I 10.0 I?EW 3rd Ave Stain Tnr-k 270 270
44 PSTM 06 I 10.0 IFZ4 Dantcart Inpry zs
44 PSTM 07 I 10.0 107 Miscellareas Drainage Imp-u e eats 3i3 353
,4 MIM 08 I 10.0 1W,4 Strearsld2 Restcratim & Tree Plantirg 4 4
44 PSTM 09 I 10.0 114 E,?aril Public Wr 'se Cf Shop
C4 P.STM 10 I 10.0 115 aafaLl Treatr=t
44 PSTM 12 I 10.0 IG9 MiIL Creek (ALari Slokgi Floc) 84 84
C r LIST014.LA! 16-Jut-93 9
1994 CIP PRIORITIES D
1994 CAPITAL IWROvaEW PRCG2AM
RECJl,eEED
------------------
DE T RANK 1994 CIP OTHER
R-M DEPT RANK AW PRCJ TITLE REO-.EST RM FLWS BLDCET MVITTE DISCISSICN
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
44 PZTM 13 I 10.0 I08 Greco River Right Bark Levee Ivp�t 290 290
44 SMR 02 I 10.0 I10 Eland Prblic 4Jc i Use Of 5hcp
44 Saa C4 I 10.0 113 Ma3zw Hills Irterc2ctor
4,197 4,197
Ga-F W To be t-termimd
48 GOLF C2 4.1 I 19 Par 3 / Rage lmr tim 25 Mieet WGotf A6Ascry Board fall S3
48 WLF 01 I 5.0 IFE.l Rarge Netting 25 Mgt WColf Adii scry 5.3a� fall
48 GOLF 03 8.7 JIEd Ditch hitch 1,eet WGcLf A64iscry 6.:ard fall T;
48 GOLF C4 I 8.7 I 35 Par 3/Rargel'rari ir�/ti{ini Pitt IrpF -,ts Nr_t WO�tf A6iisc+y Boa,'j fat T -
48 GOLF M2 I 10.0 IIE,, Mairt. faciliry 253 Mgt WGclf A.Ascry &3ard fact 93
------------- ---------
-03
ECU[Pt,ENT RE'ITAL FUD
51 ER Ol I 8.6 IC3 City S'ic.cs Rol Facility Q 40
51 ER 02 I 10.0 IC4 E=.-d Pubtic l:cr75 l'se Of S`xn
4,1 t{p
CCC LIST014.u-Ql 16-Jut-43
DRAFT FUNDING FOR FIRE TOP 1J D lu(
1994 - 1999 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (�
FIRE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
REVENUES 1993 " 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998
OLD BOND FUNDS 25
CIP ALLOCATION 200 240 349 (349)
MDT (1/2) $328,828 63 32 33 32
800 MHZ (1/2) $850,000 - _ 425
GENERAL FUND EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 300 330 360 390 420
TOTAL 288 572 712 468 390 420
EXPENDITURES
1 HEARING PROTECTION 82
2 74 PUMPER 371
3 85 ENGINE / ?? 371
4 LIVE FIRE SIMULATOR (BURN PROPS) 440 270
5 APPARATUS MAINT VEHICLE 5I;
6 SECURITY FENCE/RAMP 12 3
7 FIRE COMPUTER EQUIP 8 SOFTWARE 157
8 PAINT EXTERIOR OF BUILDINGS 50
9 SEAL COATING - 30
10 REPLACE 1981 AERIAL 568
TOTAL 0 866 706 157 440 270
REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES 288 (294) 6 311 (50) 150
- BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 0 288 (6) 0 311 261
ENDING FUND BALANCE 288 (6) 0 311 261 411
CCC FIRE EQ.WQ! 23-Ju(-93
Q
0
R
¢
a
w
r
z_
z
a
O
a
w
o Z o 0 0 0
Ri (7 Ri R Ri R
w
w w w w w w
r U r r r r
z r z_ z z z ,
U
mm •- w � o r
^ r w
W V
m a
J
a
w
o O
m 0 0
m ,
0 0 o m o o 0
n O O O a O P c N O R
0 0 m N
X_
¢
m o r
b O N O N O R m O R Q
� P �
^ Z
W
W
V
5
m N d
o m r m ^ m N n o w
m vi
¢
a
a
d
a
N O N N n l� v O N Om O O m m O
a O N
� N
¢ Q
d m
F �
Z W
W ~
U
G C N b N N O
a - a
w w
¢ m
y O
� J
G
¢ x
G w
a
Q �
w ¢
C9 w ¢
J U aO
a
a Z
a m U w w I O W ¢ ¢
�- a ¢ N > ¢ o O W a r ¢ w W Z Z a w z > w
Z J Q �' W G Z N O J N � a W G H J S W W F J w
W d w - z W U Q O� J Q Z N ¢ d W U V U d Z O J W O
W ¢ r Z Q N J d N m m r 0 O F- d Q y (� W N j N W W U � > W
O z Uum
m ^Oq E z Q O �- Q z r " ¢ ¢ O 0 m Y � N r y W Q U Y W U Q 2 o vOi
0 d ¢ Z Q V '� W W a ~ a W N W N Q d V Z m d W O W d J Q N w 3 W W 7 W Z d r Y J Q
G O O g LL Z Q O LL W w Z Z W m F ¢ F d w W Z W O Q J J J V ¢ F7-
dVqOr WWW¢ HQdU '-' m m JC� H W S ♦ ♦ LL ♦ N OLL d W ♦ j Q Q ¢ J a a ♦ ♦ mO 7¢
6Zj F Z N W O VZ W 'F O Z W � o N W ¢ z> Q O >Zw uNw z >Q S j
¢ W OOdZ HZ N ZW
W a N7Na Q
W OOaQOG W U m 4 OO Q W O
O ¢
O W
O O� dGQ WZG O >2O ¢ O z Q Z W O
W Q U <w D WW 2m0 Q OO O mX E QW2 JZ¢wS
•- a • LL d F- V d r ♦ r
O
Z_
O ¢ LL LL LL LL LL LL tL LL LL IY LL LL IL LL LL LL LL LL LL 1 tY LL lL LL LL lL LL
wTg4
CITY OF )O\L22 �r
CITY OF KENT ^
PLANNING DEPARTMENT VPri
(206) 859-3390 JUC CA
d�erncaa� MEMORANDUM
Y ORAND 93 M
CIryADIIV/221993
J
�TjpN
TO: TONY McCARTHY, CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER
FROM: LIN BALL, HUMAN SERVICES MANAGER
SUBJECT: HOUSING FOR HOMELESS MEN - CIP REQUEST,
Per your request I have outlined in this memo the history of this
project and additional information describing the program.
Project History
This program originated in the City Council Planning Committee in
1991 . The need for sheltering for the homeless had become more
visible to the City during 1990 , resulting in the implementation of
the City ' s Severe Weather Shelter Program in 1991 . Early in 1991
the Planning Committee expressed its desire for the City to look to
a longer term solution for more permanent housing for the homeless
(beyond severe weather sheltering) . The Committee asked the Human
Services Commission and 'staff .to pursue a more permanent solution.
In response to this request,` Planning Department human services
staff called together the ' Emergency Severe Weather Shelter
Coalition in -March of 1991 . This Coalition, comprised of city
staff, local churches, Human Services Commission members, and
agencies providing housing for the homeless , was originally formed
to develop the severe weather shelter program for the City. They
now came back together to address the need for more permanent
housing for the homeless . The Coalition targeted housing for
single men as the most critical need, as there are no existing
programs in the community to address this population. The group
set a goal to work together to locate a shelter for single men in
Kent by 1993 . They would look at pursuing all funding sources
(federal, state, county, local) .
The City Council adopted the development of a shelter for homeless
single men as one of its 1991-92 and 1992-93 high priority target
issues. So human services staff has been involved in this project
since 1991 . Our role has been primarily as facilitator to bring
the key players together to make this project a reality. We have
also offered technical assistance to the project. Catholic
Community Services (CCS) is the agency that has come forward,
willing to take this project on and to own and manage this project.
)D
Tony McCarthy
July 23 , 1993
Page 2
Project Cost
The total capital cost of the project is $490, 186 . Operating and
support services costs are in addition to this, totaling
approximately $91, 000 in the first year. The majority of the
operating and support services costs are being requested in the
Federal grant application.
$360, 000 of the required capital costs have already been committed
to this project (from state, county and City Block Grant dollars) .
These are outlined on the attached 6/29/93 E-Mail memo. In
addition, CCS has applied for Federal dollars in the amount of
$485, 490. $130, 186 of this amount is for Capital dollars; the
remainder is operational and service dollars . We will not know the
results of this request until mid-August.
Of the $490, 000 capital dollars for this project, $185 , 000 is for
the purchase of the house, and $241 , 611 is for construction costs
for renovation and building a 4 bedroom addition to the house. The
remaining costs include items . such as closing costs, sales tax,
architectural fees, project management , contingency, etc.
Description of current 'Need
Single homeless men in our City have very few affordable housing
options . There are no facilities existing to provide year round
housing to this population. The only option available for them is
during the cold weather months on nights when the temperature falls
below 35 degrees . Then they can receive a motel voucher from CCS
through Kent' s Severe Weather Shelter Program. Even then they are
eligible for a voucher for no more than 5 days in any one month,
due to limited funding. And as the need has increased we have been
forced to not even voucher on many cold weather nights due to lack
of funds.
CCS also operates an emergency assistance program, and provides a
range of services to 118 homeless men (food, clothing, laundry
tickets, sleeping bags, prescriptions, bus tickets, etc. ) . This
figure is up 20% from what had been a steady case load of about 100
during the last quarter of 1992 . CCS is currently serving at least
50 regular single homeless men.
The 1990 census included an enumeration of homeless populations by
City. The count for the City of Kent was 71 homeless individuals
on one night who were visible in street locations . It should be
noted that this is only the number seen visible on the street. It
is known that this is a lower number than what our actual homeless
/1
Tony McCarthy
July 23 , 1993
Page 3
count is since census enumerators didn ' t seek out the homeless
living in tents, under bridges, etc.
The question has been raised that "won't providing the transitional
housing attract more homeless people to Kent?" . I feel that the
answer is "no" . They are already here. These are men who are
already homeless in Kent, living on the streets or in tents, cars,
etc. We do have an existing large homeless population, as
evidenced by agencies such as CCS who serve these people on a
regular basis, and substantiated by the 1990 Census data. We can
also see them with our own eyes on the streets of Kent. This
Housing for Homeless Men program will address the needs of Kent ' s
current homeless population, and take a positive step forward in
helping to reduce our homeless population . It will assist these
men in moving out of the cycle of homelessness into permanent
housing.
Description of Project
The program ,will house 11 single homeless working men ranging
primarily in age from 25-45 , and one resident manager. The project
will be owned and operated by CCS . CCS has much experience in
operating homeless shelters in Seattle. The residence will be a
12-bedroom house . This is not a shelter, but rather a boarding
house type of residence. The average stay will be 6-8 months, with
a 2 year maximum. Any stay beyond one year will require that the
resident is attending technical training. The men residing at the
home are required to be working at least part time. They will pay
300 of their income for the housing .
The goal of the Program is to get these men off the streets and
into a stable living environment where they can save enough money
to move into permanent housing. In order to accomplish this goal
a CCS case manager will staff the home, offering support services
to help the men transition into permanent housing. CCS will screen
the men who will live in the house and take those most likely to
succeed in this program. CCS knows these men, as they work with
them regularly now, providing services through their emergency
services program and our Severe Weather Shelter Program.
CCS hopes to have the house ready and operating by fall of 1994 .
At this point the project is hinging on receipt of the Federal
dollars . This is a very competitive pot, and if CCS doesn't
receive the money, our City ' s CIP dollars will be even more
critical then ever. The City ' s money could be used to leverage
other potential funding sources that would have to be secured in
order for this project not to die.
10
Tony McCarthy
July 23 , 1993
Page 4
Note•
CCS now has a purchase and sale agreement on a house on E. Titus
Street in Kent for this project. At the time that I submitted the
CIP request, the final numbers had not been completed on the
purchase and renovation- of this new house. So we were making our
best guess when we requested $150, 00o of City CIP money. Now that
the numbers are finalized, we know that we need only an additional
$130, 000 of capital dollars in addition to what has already been
committed from other funding sources. So the request for CIP money
for this project can be reduced from $150 000 to $130 , 000.
I hope that this information addresses all of your questions. You
will note from the attached copies of memos to Mayor Kelleher and
the City Council that we have been typing to keep them updated on
the status of this project (since it was a Council Target Issue) .
If you need any further information please call me at 850-4787 .
LB/slc:homeless . cip
Attachments
cc: Dan Kelleher, Mayor'
Jim Harris, Planning Director
Betsy Czark, Planner
i�
S
Me=sage. Dated: 06/29/93 at 1802 .
S, ject: CIP Request - Housing for Homeless Men
Sender: Lin BALL / KENT70/PL Contents : 2 .
Part 1.
FROM: Lin BALL / KENT70/PL
TO: Tony MCCARTHY / KENT70/AD
CC: Betsy CZARK / KENT70/PL
dim HARRIS / KENT70/PL
Part 2 .
Tony -
Per your request, here are the figures on the grant money that CCS
has been awarded to . date for the transitional housing for single
homeless men:
1 . State of Washington Housing Assistance Program funds : $175, 000
2 . King County Housing Opportunity Funds : $120 , 000
3 . King County CDBG funds : $40 , 000
4 . City of Kent CDBG (Block Grant) funds : $25 , 000
TOTAL FUNDS C01,24ITTED: $360 , 000
In addition, CCS has made application for Federal McKinney dollars in
the amount of $485 , 490 . $130, 000 of this amount is for CAPITAL dollars;
the remainder is operational and service dollars . We will not know
the results of this request until late July or August .
Some additional info. on project:
The facility will serve 11 homeless men in a 12 bedroom, single family
type house with 1 bedroom for the resident manager. Residents in the
home will be employed homeless men. A condition of participation in the
program is that homeless individual be employed at least part time.
With support services provided through the program, full-time employment
will be expected once education and training needs have been met ---
to help resident transition into permanent housing.
If you have any additional questions please feel free to call me at
Ext. 4787 .
I excited that the Council saw this critical need and gave it a
high rating.
S
Start of Item 331.
Message. Dated: 07/08/93 at 1744 .
Subject: CIP Request - Housing for Homeless Men
Sender: Lin BALL / KENT70/PL Content_ 2 .
FROM: Lin BALL / KENT70/PL
Part 1.
FROM: Lin BALL / KENT70/PL
TO:. Tony MCCARTHY / KENT70/AD -
CC: Betsy CZARK / KENT70/PL
Jim HARRIS / KENT70/PL
Part 2 .
A follow-up on my June 29th E-Mail regarding the CIP request for the
Housing for Homeless Men project. In that memo I outlined for you the
various funding sources (totalling $360 , 000) ccmmitted to this project.
I also noted that the last needed funding piece is the McKinny noney
totaling $485 , 490 . $130 , 00 of that is for capital; the remainder being
operation and service dollars . The latest update is that we will not
know the results of this request until mid-Aug•,:st .
I just found out. from the grant writer that the chances of receiving
this funding are looking more grim. She informed me that McKinny
received 1400 applications for 'the 1 Million dollars they have to
allocate. This is TWICE as many applications as they received last
year.
So, what this means, is that it is more critical then ever for the
City to allocate the $150, 000 of CIP money to this project. If the
McKinny money isn't granted, the City's money could be used to leverage
other potential funding sources that would have to be searched out in
order for this project not to die.
Call me at 4787 if you have questions or need further information.
Thanks.
End of Item 331.
�j CITY OF KENT
CITY OF )1;\Ltt7� u PLANNING DEPARTMENT
(206) 859-3390
MEMORANDUM
November 1.7 . 1992
dFi6°IIO4A
EMO O: MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMITTEE MEMBERS
FROM: LIN BALL, HUMAN SERVICES MANAGER
SUBJECT: HOUSING FOR SINGLE HOMELESS MEN
I have some unfortunate news to share with you ;.regarding the
Housing For Single Homeless Men project scheduled to open in the
fall of 1993 . Catholic Community Services (CCS) and the
Archdiccesan Housing Authority (A1LA) were recently notified that
this project was denied federal McKinney funding.
Just under half of the funding needed ( $496 , 000) to acquire and
rehabilitate the site and provide services was requested from the
McKinney funds . Therefore, it will ke impossible to open the
housing in 1993 as scheduled .
CCS and the AHA have decided to reapply for McKinney funds in 1993 .
The project grant writer has already met with HUD representatives
to, determine the weak points of the application . The application
was awarded maximum points in program design but received reduced
points in cost feasibility. HUD believes that the cost of
rehabilitation per person served was too high.
The development team on this project is going to try to obtain some
type of option on the site currently selected (206 Naden) . The
team is looking at increasing the number of men served in the
facility from 10 to 12 and reducing some of the construction costs .
The development team also plans to seek additional funds from
neighboring cities and King County. These changes should create a
more favorable application in 1993 .
There is some good news . The State of Washington Housing
Assistance Program funds ($175 , 000) , King County Housing
Opportunity Funds ($120, 000) and City of Kent Community Development
Block Grant (CDBG) funds ($25, 000) will remain allocated to this
project for the next year. These applications will not have to be
resubmitted.
It is unfortunate that this greatly needed housing will have to be
delayed another year. However, the development team believes they
are taking the proper steps to improve the grant proposal, and -that
federal funding will be awarded in 1993 .
I will keep you informed on the progress of this project. If you
have any questions please call me at extension 4787 or Alice Shobe,
Planner at extension 4788 .
LB/mp:LH:ais:\men' s\update.pc
. F CITY O ��M�
CITY OF KENT
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
(206) 859-3390
�nc�9 MEMORANDUM
July 17 , 1992
TO: MAYOR DAN KELLEHER AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: LIN BALL` AGER
OFFICE O HOUSING & HUMAN SERVICES
RE: HOUSING FOR HOMELESS SINGLE MEN
Much progress has been made! Attaches is a flyer describing the
proposed Housing Program for Homeless Single Men in Kent . Catholic
Community services (CCS) and the Archdiocesan Housing Authority
have cooperatively developed this program in response to the City
Council ' s Target Issues for 1991-1993 . If the remaining pieces
fall into place, the housing will be available in April 1993 !
The proposed program has been awarded $175 , 000 from the State of
Washington and $125 , 000 from King County. Applications have been
submitted to the City b,f Kent and the Department of Housing and
Urban Development . (HUD) for the balance of funding needed. A
purchase and sale agreement has been signed for the property
located at 206 Naden Avenue S . , however, transfer of title is
dependent on- receiving funds from the City of Kent and HUD. The
Capital funds requested from the City are $25, 000 of 1993 Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG) dollars .
Catholic Community Services is in the process of informing the
community of the proposed program ccs will go door to door in the
immediate neighborhood to explain the proposed program on Thursday,
July 16 . They will also hold a public meeting on Tuesday, July 28,
at 7 : 00 p.m. in their office located at 1229 W. Smith Street. You
are all invited to attend.
My staff has been working closely with CCS and their development
team. Please feel free to direct your questions or refer questions
to Alice Shobe, Planner, at 859-3390 .
Attachment
cc: James P. Harris, Planning Director
Alice Shobe, Planner
A.LS/slc:men' s\flyer.mem
�r7
va fI�
' JLI
kv-CATHOLIC
COMMUNITY
SERVICES
South King County
HOUSING PROGRAM FOR HOMELESS SINGLE MEN
206 Naden Avenue South
Kent;WA 98032
Catholic Community Services (CCS) has been providing social services to the residents of
Washington State since 1937. In 1985, a office vvis established in Kent to better provide services
to residents of South King County. Our mission is to provide, without discrimination, quality social
services to those in need. CCS assists residents of our community who are needy, vulnerable and
lack other resources.
In keeping with our mission, CCS entered into contract with the City of Kent to administer the
Severe Weather Shelter Program beginning in 1990. Through this program, we provide.motel
vouchers to homeless individuals and families on nights when the temperature drops below 35
degrees. During the last two winters we found that 75 percent of the homeless individuals
requesting vouchers were single men who live in cars and outdoors in South King County. These
men, for the most part, work in low paying jobs and can not afford area rents. These men need an
affordable, stable housing situation in order to find better paying jobs to support themselves.
The City of Kent supports our proposed housing program. In fact, we have responded directly to a
Kent City Council priority for the years 1991-1993 to create housing for homeless men. We have
worked closely with the City In each step of devcioping t�is progcIm.
Goal of the Program: To provide housing and some support services for single homeless men. Our
agency will work with the.individual men'to develop the goal of obtaining permanent employment
and affordable housing.
Residents of the Home: 10 homeless, working men and one Resident Manager. All residents
(excluding the manager) will be required to pay rent equal to 30 percent of their income.
Ownership of the Home: The Archdiocesan Housing Authority fAl-!A) will own the home. AHA has
27 years of experience in developing housing for individuals and f.-mihes. At the present time,
AHA owns 700 units of housing ih Western.Washingtcn.
Program Sunoort Management: Catholic Community Services of South King County, located at
1229 W. Smith in Kent, will provide staffing and support services for this program.
Selection of Residents: Applicants will be selected by the CCS Case Manager. Only suitable
applicants will be accepted into the program. Specifically, CCS wdl gather information on: the
applicant's personal background; employment history; reason for becoming homeless; goals; and
expectations of the program. A Washington State Patrol check wi!) be required of all prospective
applicants. No applicants with a history of violent crimewill be accepted into the program. No
applicants will be accepted from work release programs or immediately following release from jail.
Program Commitment of the Residents: Each resident will agree to work with the CCS Case
Manager to establish individual goals. These goals will be reviewed by the resident and Case
Manager on a monthly basis. The resident(s) must agree to comply with all house rules. No illegal
drugs or alcohol will be permitted in the facility. Use or possessicn of illegal drugs is cause for
immediate eviction.
Length of Stay: Residents are eligible to remain in the house for up to two years. Many residents
will meet their goals in less time. We anticipate the residents Nall :emnin an average of six months
to one year.
Neighborhood Commitment: Catholic Community Services and the residents in our program want
to be good neighbors. Property maintenance is a priority of our program. If you should ever have
any questions about our program please contact cur office, Monday through Friday, at 854-0077.
Neighborhood Involvement in the Program: We are very interested in involving you in our program.
We will host an information meeting to discuss this housing program on Tuesday, July 28 at 7 p.m.
at the CCS office: 1229 W. Smith (behind Johnny's). Representatives from our agency, the City
of Kent, and community groups who will participate in this program, will be available to address
your questions and receive your comments. We look forward to meeting you!
If you are unable to attend the meeting or have general questions please call Cathy Peters,
Director, CCS of South King County at 854-0077.
If you wish to speak with a City of Kent representative p'.case call Alice Shobe, Planner at 859-
3390.
1229 Vc l Smith Street,P.O.flux 393,Kepi,WA OSMV098 o Phm,c QO(,)8 5,VC77 a WM7;: 1000)T22-1179 •Par: Ce6)85t125m
CITY OF L4\l�)�V
CITY OF KENT
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
(206) 859-3390
MEMORANDUM
November 19 , 1991
MEMO TO: DAN KELLEHER, MAYOR
FROM: JAMES P. HARRIS, PLANNING DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: SINGLE MEN' S SHELTER (Boarding House type
Transitional living arrangement)
As you are aware, development of a shelter for homeless single men
is one of the City ' s 1991-92 high priority target issue (#5-a ,
Expand Human Services) .
The need for sheltering for the homeless became more visible to the
City last year, resulting in the implementation of the City ' s
Severe Weather Shelter Program. Early this year the Citv Council
Planning Committee expressed its desire to have the City look at a
longer term solution (beyond severe weather) for more permanent
shelter for the homeless . This need for more permanent shelter was
reinforced by the City ' s Emergency Severe Weather Shelter Coalition
which worked on the formation of the City ' s severe weather program.
In March of this year, the Coalition (made up of City staff, local
churches, Human Services Commission members, and agencies providing
housing for homeless) came back together to address the need for
more permanent housing for the homeless .
At this meeting they also targeted housing for single men as the
most critical need for long-term sheltering in South King County.
Further, the agencies expressed a commitment to work together on a
goal of locating a shelter for single men in the Kent area by 1993 .
They would look at pursuing all grant funding sources -- Federal,
State, County, local.
Now that the funding cycles for many grants are fast approaching
(HOF pre-application is due Dec. 4) , the Coalition has come back
together to lay out its strategy for acquiring funding. The
Planning Department ' s role in this has been as
facilitator/convener, bringing together all the parties who will be
a part of this project (agencies, churches, grant writer) . Lin
Ball and Alice Shobe of my staff are t:-he two key staff members
involved in this project.
It appears that Catholic Community Services (CCS) will be the
agency who will be the sponsor of this project and apply for grant
money. The Coalition is looking at a target population of working
men between the ages of 20 - 40 ; men who are income able and
19
Single Men 's Shelter
November 19 , 1991 ,/
Page 2 ,
willing to work, but who are not in a stable working situation.
This is the general population of single men in Kent, as indicated
by contact with local human service agencies .
The type of housing being looked at for a single men ' s shelter
would be a boarding house type of transitional living arrangement,
rather than an open shelter. Transitional housing would allow for
housing up to two years, with the goal for the residents to save
adequate money to be able to move into permanent housing.
Although our role has been as facilitator to bring the key players
together to make this project a reality, we know that there will
also be a funding role. We have made it clear to Coalition members
that due to the city ' s financial situation, any special or
emergency grants would be out of the question . As you know, grants
such as HOF do require funding commitments from the City in which
the project is located . The one available source for the City to
do some local capital matching for these grants is the City ' s 1993
Block Grant funds . We have set a precedent for this type of
funding in previous Block Grant project:: : the 1991 Block Grant
funding of KYFS ' s Teen Parent Transitional Housing Project; and the
1992 Block Grant funding of the KCHA/YLiCA So. King County Domestic
Violence Transitional Housing Project.
Due to funding application deadlines, this is a project that it
appears will be moving quickly. I would like an opportunity for
Lin 'Ball and . I to meet with you to inform you further on this
project before you leave on your trip this week. Would you be
-available to meet Wednesday evening?
Please 'call me at Ext. 3390 to arrange a meeting time. Thanks
for your consideration of this request.
JPH/mp:a: lb:mayor.mem
cc: Fred Satterstrom, Planning Manager
Lin Ball, Senior Planner
in
S
Message. Dated: 06/29/93 at 1802 .
Subject: CIP Request - Housing for Homeless Men
Sender: Lin BALL / KENT70/PL Contents : 2 .
Part 1.
FROM: Lin BALL / KENT70/PL
TO: Tony MCCARTHY / KENT70/AD
CC: Betsy CZARK / KENT70/PL
Jim HARRIS / KENT70/PL
Part 2 .
Tony -
Per your request, here are the figures on the grant money that CCS
has been awarded to date for the transitional housing for single
homeless men:
1. State of Washington Housing Assistance Program funds : $175, 000
2 . King County Housing Opportunity Funds : $120 , 060
3 . King County CDBG funds : $40 , 000
4 . City of Kent CDBG (Block GVant) funds : $25 , 000
TOTAL FUNDS COMMITTED: $360, 000
In addition, CCS has made application for Federal McKinney dollars in
the amount. of $485, 490 . $130 , 000 of this amount is for CAPITAL dollars ;
the remainder is operational and service dollars. We will not know
the results of this request until late July or August.
Some additional info. on project:
The facility will serve 11 homeless men in a 12 bedroom, single. family
type house with 1 bedroom for the resident manager. Residents in the
home will be employed homeless men. A condition of participation in the
program is that homeless individual be employed at least part time.
With support services provided through the program, full-time employment
will be expected once education and training needs have been met ---
to help resident transition into permanent housing.
If you have any additional questions please feel free to call me at
Ext. 4787 .
I am excited that the Council saw this critical need and gave it a
high rating.
�1 1
MCCARTHY,TONY / KENT70/AD - HPDesk print.
-----------------------------------------
M Sage. Dated: 07/08/93 at 1744 .
Subject: CIP Request - Housing for Homeless Men
Sender: Lin BALL / KENT70/PL Contents : 2 .
TO: Tony MCCARTHY / KENT70/AD
Part 1.
FROM: Lin BALL / KENT70/PL
TO: Tony MCCARTHY / KENT70/AD
CC: Betsy CZARK / KENT70/PL
Jim HARRIS / KENT70/PL
Part 2 .
A follow-up on my June 29th E-Mail regarding the CIP request for the
Housing for Homeless Men project: In---that memo I outlined for you the
various funding sources (totalling �$360 , 000)) committed to this project.
I also noted that the last needed funding piece is the McKinny money
totaling $485, 490 . $130, 00 of that is for capital ; the remainder being
operation and service dollars . The latest update is that we will not
know the results of this request until mid-August :
I must found out from the grant writer that the chances of receiving
t s funding are looking more grim. She informed me that McKinny
received 1400 applications for the 1 Million dollars they have to
allocate . This is TWICE as many, applications as they received last
year.
So, what this means, is that it is more critical then ever for the
City to allocate the $150, 000 of CIP money to this project . If the
McKinny money isn't granted, the City' s money could be used to leverage
other potential funding sources that would have to be searched out in
order for this project not to die..
Call me at 4787 if you have questions or need further information.
Thanks .
nn
MILLER,MAYENE / KENT70/FN - HPDesk print.
-----------------------------------------
Dated: 07/23/93 at 1325 .
Message.
Subject: Commons Air Conditioning Contents : 2 .
Sender: Lori HOGAN / KENT70/PK
TO: Mayene MILLER / KENT70/FN
Part I.
TO: Mayene MILLER / KENT70/FN
CC: Patrice THORELL / KENT70/PK
Part 2 .
May, As a follow up to our phone conversation regarding Air Conditioning at
the Kent Commons, here are a few additional issues to consider:
* There are 15 full time city employees and approx. 40 employees of the
agencies that lease space in this facility. The unreasonably high
temperatures . in the building are impacting the health of the people
working here (as evidenced by sick leave requests when it is especially hot)
Worker productivity is decreased and moral is negatively effected.
* It' s extremely difficult to determine how much facility rental revenue is
lost due to the excessive temperatures in the building but it is significant
to note that the buildings slowest rental period is in the summer months
when the most weddings are occurring. This facility should be booked as
year. Guests passing out -
heavily as it is .the other nine months of the
from the heat and wedding cakes melting aren ' t positive reflections on
this facility.
* It has been the . city' s policy to maintain and update city facilities as
evidenced by the _Police dept. remodel, City Hall remodel , city shops etc.
The Commons is an extremely valuable city property and should be maintained
and used to it' s fullest potential .
* It' s also interesting to note that budget meetings were previously scheduled
in this facility during July and August and have since relocated to other
buildings as it was determined that it was too hot and uncomfortable to meet
here.
Please let me know if any additional information would be helpful . I will plan
to attend' Mondays Budget Committee mtg. to answer any additional questions that
may come up.
Thanks for your help ,
Lori Hogan
V,_;
TED BOWER
ASSOCIATES
ARCHITECTS
3860 East Olive Street
Seattle Washington 98122
June 7 , 1993 (206) 329-1441
Ms . Lori Hogan
Kent Commons
525 4th Avenue North
Kent, WA 98032
RE: KENT COMMONS AIR CONDITIONING PROJECT
Dear Ms . Hogan:
This letter is in response to your request for updated preliminary cost
estimates for work outlined in our report submitted to you October 4, 1991 .
I believe the Park Department was in agreement with us that cooling of the
locker rooms should be excluded.; therefore we use below the total construction
cost amount of $144 ,100. (see enclosed SUMMARY OF ESTIMATED COSTS OF RECOM-
MENDED IMPROVEMENTS from our 10/4/91 report) as a basis for revised estimates .
In addition to a cost adjustment for inflation the estimate . also itemizes
the State Sales Tax and an estimate of the cost of our professional services .
Estimated Construction Cost , September 1991 ,
not including Sales Tax: $ 144,100.
Estimated cost increase as of June 1993 , 11 ,528.
144 ,100 x 8%
$ 155 ,628.
State Sales Tax @ 8.2% 12 ,761 .
Total : $ 168 ,389 .
Estimated Architectural , Mechanical ,
Electrical fees , September 1991 : $ 15 ,70C •
Estimated fee increase as of
June 1993, 15 ,700 x 8%: 1 ,256.
$ 16 ,956.
Allowance for consultants' site
visits and reports : 2 ,500 .
Total estimated consultant costs 19 ,456 .
Total estimated Project Cost: $ 187,845 .
SOBOWER
rs ,
TOCIATES
Enclosure
Copy to : Edward S. Sider & Associates
Atkinson Associates
�v
(Submitted October 4 , 1991 )
KENT CON14ONS AIR CONDITIONING PROJECT
SUMMARY OF ESTIMATED COSTS OF REC0141ENDED IIIPCCVEh1ENTS
General Work Mechanical Electrical Totals
New Panel "AC' 500.
0 3 ,500. 4,000 .
System 1 4 ,000. 24 ,400 . 3,100. 31 ,500.
Systems ZA & 2B 11 ,000_
40 ,100_ 4,800. 55 ,900.
System 3
1 ,500. 18 ,500. 3 ,200 . 23 ,200.
System 4
* 1 ,000.* 16 ,300 .* 2 ,200 .* 19 ,500 .*
System 5 1 ,500. 15) ,500. 2 ,200. 19 ,200.
?Miscellaneous 2 ,500. 5 ,000. 2 ,800. 10,300.
Totals 22 ,000. 119 ,800. 21 ,800. 163,600
Deduct System 4 -1 ,000 . 16,300 . -2 ,200. -19 ,500.
Revised Totals .21 ,000. 103 ,500. 19 ,600. 144,100
* System 4 not" recommended.
�c
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
JULY 21, 1993
TO: PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE
FROM: DON WICKSTROMI
RE: GRANT FUNDING
The City has recently been offered a T. I . B. grant for the
improvement of S . 212th St . from West Valley Highway to SR 167 .
The project would include widening the existing roadway to add
H. O .V. lanes, curb and gutters, sidewalk, street lighting, etc.
The total estimated cost of the project is $3 , 650 , 000 . The T. I . B.
grant offer is for $2 , 920 , 000 with the difference ($730, 000) being
local monies . It is anticipated that the local monies would come
from the following sources .
212th St . H. O. V. Study $100, 000 Budgeted
76th & 212th Intersection Imp . $ 45, 000 Budgeted
Street C. I . P. $350, 000 ' 94 Budget
LID S235 , 000 Proposed
$730, 000
The $350, 000 in the 1994 Street C. I . P. is presently designated for
a project at the intersection of James Street & Central Avenue
(installing a right turn lane on the northeast corner thereof) . In
light of the grant, we request that this money be shifted to this
project. As such, since the Street C'. I . P. is presently at the
hearing stage before Council, we request that this change be made
to the Street C. I. P.
ACTION: Public Works Committee recommends that the $350 , 000
denoted in the Draft Street C. I . P. for the James & Central ,
intersection project be reallocated to the S . 212th St. H.O.V. '
project.
CITY OF KEN7i
State of Washington
rr Transportatiol7improvernentBoard JUN 141993
q Transparlalion Building KF-01 ENGINEEHING DE°T,
0 Olympia. Washinalon 98504
(206)753-7198 SCAN 234-7196
June 9, 1993
Mr. Don Wickstrom, P.E.
Public Works Director
City .of Kent
220- 4th Avenue South
Kent, WA 98032-5895
Proposed Transportation Improvement Project
1993-1995 UATA Program Funding
S 21 2th Street
W Valley F,,,y tc SR 167
City oil
Dear Mr. Wickstrom:
We are pleased to advise you your project rated high in the Urban Arterial Trust Account
(UATA) 1 993-1 995 Program Priority Array. you may submit this project to the Transportation
Improvement Board for funding,consideration. The tota'. amount of UATA funds available for
the project is $2,920,000. '
UATA funds for projects are authorized by the Board in two phases. The phases are as
follows:
o The design phase provides funds for design engineering, right of way appraisals
and acquisition, and environmental impact analysis.
o The construction phase provides funds for construction and construction
engineering.
The subject project rated high on the Priority Array because of the following deficiencies:
low operating speed, high accident rate
When completing the design prospectus, include a detailed explanation of the type of
improvement proposed for the project. Explain how the project will address the deficiencies.
The Board has estimated the available revenue for new project starts. Prospectuses are
requested for more projects than can currently be funded (over-obligation) without causing
construction delay. Over-obligation is implemented to promote competition between agencies
for construction funds. It also allows construction funds to be utilized in a timely manner.
1n
Mr. Don Wickstrom, P.E.
June 9, 1993
Page 2
Remember, the first project submitted for construction funding is the first project in line to
receive funding, provided the prospectus is correct and complete. We have included a
Checklist for Urban Arterial Projects. We encourage you to use it to track the progress of
your project and to determine the next required submittal to the TIE.
This project will require a Value Engineering (VE) study. When the design phase of the project
is nearing the 30 percent completion stage notify the TIB staff to schedule a VE study or
submit a request for a deviation. If a deviation from the VE study requirement is requested,
a VE assessment report must be submitted with the written deviation request to the TIB. The
report must address the project characteristics, cost per mile, potential savings, high cost
items and other considerations unique to the project The TIB staff will review the report
and develop a recommendation as to whether the VE study deviation should be granted.
Enclosed are copies of the design prospectus. The TIB office should receive a completed
prospectus by the first day of the month preceding the month in which project authorization
is proposed. If you have any questions regardi^Ig the project, please call the TIB office in
Olympia, at (206) 586-871 ?.
Sincerely,
John M. Tevis, P.E.
UATA Program Engineer
JMT:gjb
Enclosures
cc: Terry Paananen
Grant Funding
Wickstrom said we have been offered a T. I . B grant for approximately
$2 . 9 million and the project is approximately $3 . 6 million for
putting in HOV, sidewalks and street lighting along S. 212th, West
Valley Highway to SR 167 . He said that at this point we would like
to fund it and we have money budgeted along that route including a
small proposed L. I .D. and there is some money in the c. I.P for the
James St. and Central Ave. intersection improvement for 1994 , which
we would like to transfer to this project because we have the
grant. Wickstrom said that in subsequent years, we would budget
for Central & James. In response to White regarding the concerns
of the Bicycle Advisory Committee, Wickstrom said that' s an issue
we will need to address. He said this will put sidewalks and
street lights in there plus widening with the reconstruction of the
pavement. He said a bike lane was considered there but that may be
a function of how big we can push the LID to. White would like to
see this done. Wickstrom said right now he is primarily concerned
with getting the grant thru.
Committee unanimously agreed to reallocate the $350, 000 denoted in
the James & Central intersection project .
�C
7
L�Lh
p
"1 g
rOLF COURSE GROSS 1992 NET 15-Jul
VITAL PLAN PARKS PROJECT CARRYOVER PROJECT BUDGET BUYOUT ----------------------FORECAST----------
._SCR IPTION PRIORITY COST TO 1993 COST 1993 1993 1994 INNS INNS 1997 i998
MAINT. FACILITY-SAFETY/COST SAVINGS 1 500,000 500,000 102,481 234,941 108,671 53,907
IRRIGATION-PAR 3-COST SAVINGS 2 95,000 95,000 95,000
MAINLINE UNDER MEEKER (92) 20,000 20,000 0
COMPLEX COSMETIC FACELIFT 3 ...
COSMETIC CHANGES TO FACILITY 22,100 22,100 22,100
PORTABLE RESTROOMS 20,000 20,000 20,000
PORTABLE MAINTENANCE OFFICE RENTAL 7,900 7,900 7,900
RANGE RENOVATION-REVENUE GENERATION 4
DEMOLITION OF HOUSE 15,000 15,000 - 15,000
RELOCATION OF MINI-PUTT 100,000 100,000 100,000
NEW SOIL., DRAINAGEE, IRRIGATION 250,000 250,000 75,000 175,000
NETTING 60,000= 60,000 20,000 40,000
COVER WEST RANGE STALLS 100,000 100,000 100,000
ADD 10 TO 12 RANGE STALLS 130,000 130,000 29,302 100,698
RESTROOMS, A.D.A. (1) 5 160,000 160,000 160,000
PARKING LOT RESURFACING 6
DRIVING RANGE 0
TOTAL PROJECTS 1,480,000 20,000 1,460,000 20,000 50,000 197,481 249,941 323,671 358,209 260,693
EQUIPMENT
HONDA UTILITY CART CURRENT 6,000 6,000 6,-00
BED KNIFE/REEL GRINDER CURRENT 17,500 17,500 17,500
SAND TRAP GROOMING ATTACHMENT CURRENT 1,500 1,500 1,500
AER WAY AERATOR CURRENT 3,500 3,500 3,500
GREENS ROLLERS CURRENT 5,000 5,C00 5,000
TOP DRESSER CURRENT 8,100 8,100 8, 1C0
HYDROJECT 1 30,000 30,C00 30,000
FERTILIZER SPREADER 2 3,500 3,500 3,500
DITCH WITCH - 3 28,000 23,000 28,000
SE BALL WASHING UNIT 4 10,000 l0,000 10,000
.DUP ALARMS 5 1,400 1,400 i,4G0
FUNGICIDE SPRAY APP 6 20,000 20,000 20,000
AERATOR FOR LAKES 7 20,000 20,000 20,000
GREE•NSAIRE REPLCMNT 10,000 10,000 10,000
GREENSMOWE.R REPLCMNT 5,000 5,000 5,000
TRACTOR VEHICLE REPLCMNT 10,000 10,000 10,000
UTILITY VEHICLE REPLCMNT 12,000 12,C00 12,000
REEL LAWNMOWER REPLCMNT 2,000 2,000 2,000
100 GALLON SPRAYER - REPLCMNT 6,000 6,000 6,000
OLATHEE BLOWER REPLCMNT 3,000 33,000 3,000
MISC MAINTENANCE TOOLS/EQUIP REPLCMNT 20,000 20,000 20,000
HONDA UTILITY CART REPLCMNT 6,900 6,9CO 6,900
BED KNIFE/REEL GRINDER - REPLCMNT 20,125 20,125 1 20,125
SAND TRAP GROOMING ATTACHMENT REPLCMNT 1,725 1,725 , 1,725
AER WAY AERATOR REPLCMNT 4,025 4,025 4,025
GREENS ROLLERS REPLCMNT 5,750 5,750 5,750
TOP DRESSER REPLCMNT 9,315 9,315 - _ 9,315
TOTAL EQUIPMENT 270,340 0 2.70,340 41,600 10,000 61,500 41,400 0 0 115,840
TOTAL 1,750,340 20,000 1,730,340 61,660 60,000 258,981 291,341 323,671 358,209 376,533
(1) Seeking joint funds from county.
7n
THE CITY OF KENT GOLF ADVISORY BOARD
RIVERBEND GOLF COMPLEX IMPROVEMENTS
EXPENDITURE RECOMMENDATIONS
Maintenance Projects - in priority order
Asphalt Foot Bridge 974 Contractor
Mini Putt Facelift (4x4 borders, paint, 7,707 Contractor, In-house
carpet)
Thin trees around courses 7,200 Contractor
Sand for traps, 30 ton 767 In-house
Maintenance Building, paint outside 450 In-house
Stump removal, unit rental only 1,250 minimum charge
Vacuum Cleaner, commercial model 650
Sub Total 18,998
Complex Improvements
Par 3 Course
Paint Building 1,042 Contractor
Build ADA approved ramp 2,500
Driving Range
Paint Building 5,900 Contractor
Purchase-Ball Washer 10,000
18 Hole
Paint/Stain Building 7,124
Sub Total 26,566
Course Rest Rooms
Purchase 2 stand alone rest rooms, including 15,711
tax and delivery
Installation costs including setting tanks, 4,410 In-house
concrete slab and signage
Sub Total 20,121
TOTAL 65,6S5
CONSENT CALENDAR
3 . City Council Action:
Council ember moved, Councilmember Y' L't%
secondWthat Consent Calendar Items A through be approved.
Discussion
Action
3A. Approval of Minutes.
Approval of the minutes of the regular Council meeting of
July 20, 1993 .
3B. Approval of Bills.
Approval of payment of the bills received through July 30, 1993
after auditing by the Operations Committee at its meeting on
August 3 , 1993 .
Approval of checks issued for vouchers:
Date Check Numbers Amount
Approval of checks issued for payroll:
Date Check Numbers Amount
Council Agenda
Item No. 3 A-B
Kent, Washington
July 20, 1993
Regular meeting of the Kent City Council was called to order at
7 : 00 p.m. by Mayor Dan Kelleher. Present: Councilmembers
Bennett, Johnson, Orr and White, Chief Administrative Officer
McCarthy, City Attorney Lubovich, Planning Director Harris,
Public Works Director Wickstrom, Police Chief Crawford, Fire
Chief Angelo, and Human Resources Director Olson. Councilmembers
Houser, Mann and Woods were excused from the meeting. Approxi-
mately 40 people were in attendance.
PUBLIC Claim Against the City. A man from the audience
COMMUNICATIONS explained that his windshield had been broken
two weeks ago by a golf ball, and that the City
has denied the claim. His wife explained that
the windshield was hit by a golf ball while she
was driving on Meeker Street, and that she
immediately talked to Mr. Sanden at the golf
course, who then called the City ' s Information
Line and the City Clerk ' s Office, and then sent
her to City Hall for a claim form. She explain-
ed that the proper procedure is to have the golf
course manager send a marshall out onto the
course to find the person who hit the ball which
hit the car, but that she was not informed of
that procedure. She said that a week after
filing her claim, she received a letter stating
that City staff had inspected the fence sur-
rounding the course and that there were no holes
in it, so the City is not liable. She said she
then drove to the course and found that there is
no fence. She noted that the City ' s risk mana-
ger stated that the staff at the golf course
knew the procedure to follow, but that golf
course staff said they were only told the pro-
cedure after this incident. She summarized that
the City is responsible for the windshield since
she was not negligent and the City provided
misinformation regarding the procedure and the
fencing. Mayor Kelleher asked that McCarthy
look into this, and the lady from the audience
presented copies of the claim and the insurance
letter to McCarthy. WHITE MOVED to direct staff
to pay the claim, if everything is substanti-
ated. Bennett seconded and the motion carried.
Auburn Race Track. Bill Dolittle, 412 N.
Washington, requested that the Council consider
adopting a resolution supporting Auburn' s effort
to secure a horse racing track, noting that any-
thing that benefits Auburn will benefit Kent.
1
July 20, 1993
PUBLIC Upon the Mayor ' s suggestion, Orr agreed to sche-
COMMUNICATIONS dule this item for an Operations Committee meet-
ing and solicit Mr. Doolittle ' s help in drafting
a resolution for consideration by the Council.
National Night Out. Mayor Kelleher read a pro-
clamation noting that National Night Out pro-
vides a unique opportunity to the Kent Police
Department to join forces with thousands of
other communities across the country in promot-
ing cooperative, police-community crime and drug
prevention efforts, and declared August 3 , 1993
as National Night Out in the City of Kent.
Police Chief Crawford noted that this is the
loth annual National Night Out and thanked the
Mayor and Council for their support.
Kherson Video. A five-minute video recently
received from Kent ' s Sister City, Kherson, was
shown.
CONSENT ORR MOVED that Consent Calendar Items A through
CALENDAR F be approved. Bennett seconded and the motion
carried.
MINUTES (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3A)
Approval of Minutes . APPROVAL of the minutes of
the regular Council meeting of July 6 , 1993 .
WATER (OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4G)
Horseshoe Acres Pump Station. The Public Works
Committee has recommended that the contract with
Omega Contractors for the Horseshoe Acres Pump
Station be accepted as complete. WHITE SO
MOVED. Bennett seconded and the motion carried.
STREETS (BIDS - ITEM 5A)
116th Avenue S.E. Road Improvements. This pro-
ject consists of constructing a new road along
116th Ave. S.E. between SE 264th St. and SE
266th St. , consistent with design criteria for
the 272nd Corridor project. Bid opening was
held on July 15th. It has been recommended by
the Public Works Committee that the low bid be
accepted for this contract, provided the low bid
received is within project budget .
2
July 20, 1993
STREETS Public Works Director Wickstrom noted that eight
bids were received and the low bid was from
Lloyd Enterprises, Inc. in the amount of
$339 , 273 . 44 , which is substantially below the
Engineer ' s estimate. Wickstrom noted that there
was a minor irregularity in the bid in that the
words were not written in, only the numbers. He
asked that this irregularity be waived.
WHITE MOVED that Lloyd Enterprises , Inc. , be
awarded the contract for the 116th Avenue S .E.
Road Improvements from S. E. 264th Street to S. E.
266th Street, in the amount of $339 , 273 . 44 and
that the irregularity on their bid be waived.
Orr seconded. The City Attorney assured Bennett
that a waiver is appropriate in this case. The
motion then carried.
TRANSPORTATION (OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4F)
Six Year Transportation Improvement Plan. The
Public Works Committee has recommended that
August 3rd be set as the public hearing date for
the Six Year Transportation Improvement Plan.
WHITE SO MOVED. Bennett seconded and the motion
carried.
SEPA (OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4H)
ADDED BY CHARLIE KIEFER
Kent City Code Amendment - Section 11. 03 . 410 .
Charlie Kiefer, 10926 S . E. 274th Street, Kent,
requested that the language in Kent City Code
Section 11 . 03 . 410 regarding public notice when
the City issues a determination of nonsignifi-
cance or any existing environmental document be
amended. He suggested that the City post the
property for site specific proposals, publish
notice in a newspaper in the area, and notify
all parties of record, including any individual
or group which has appeared at a public hearing
or submitted comments on a certain proposal.
Upon the Mayor ' s suggestion, Councilmember Orr
agreed to hear this issue at the Planning Com-
mittee on August 17 . When Kiefer stated that he
is unavailable on that date, it was determined
that he would submit his letter for discussion
on August 17 , and if his needs are not met, the
issue could be discussed further at another
meeting.
3
July 20, 1993
ANNEXATION (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3E)
Municipal Annexation - 98th & S. 231st.
ADOPTION of Ordinance No. 3127 authorizing the
annexation of three City owned parcels in the
vicinity of 98th Ave. S. & S. 231st Street, as
recommended by the Public Works Committee. The
Public Works Dept. intends to utilize these
parcels in conjunction with its development of
the Upper Garrison Creek stormwater detention
facility.
GROWTH (OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4A)
MANAGEMENT Capital Facilities Plan. The Growth Management
Act mandates that all cities and counties
develop a Capital Facilities Plan that meets the
concurrent City requirement of the Act. To
accomplish this , a budget of $78 , 160 for profes-
sional services needs to be established in order
to contract with Henderson, Young and Company.
For this budget, $52 , 693 will come from the
Growth Management Act Grant funds already set
up, and $24 , 467 will come from Unencumbered
Funds in the 1993 CIP fund. The City Council
Budget Committee reviewed this request on
June 28 , 1993 and recommended forwarding it to
Council for consideration.
Kevin O 'Neill of the Planning Department noted
that this is the most complex requirement of the
Growth Management Act, since it involves re-
quirements new to Washington State and it in-
volves many City departments and special dis-
tricts. He noted that a one-day seminar was
held by Henderson & Young for staff and Council.
O'Neill explained that the consultants have pre-
pared a proposed work plan which outlines tasks
they and staff would perform. He explained that
the reason they are requesting more than the
$74 , 800 noted in the work plan is that it, was
decided to use the entire urban growth area
rather that just city limits.
JOHNSON MOVED to establish a budget allocating
$78 , 160 for professional services for capital
facilities planning under the Growth Management
Act, and to authorize staff to prepare a con-
tract with Henderson, Young and Company for re-
view and signature by the Mayor. White seconded
and the motion carried.
4
July 20, 1993
GROWTH (OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4B)
MANAGEMENT Environmental Impact Statement - Request for
Proposals. Adoption of a new City Comprehensive
Plan pursuant to the Growth Management Act will
require preparation of an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) . In order to prepare such a
technical document in a short period of time,
outside professional services are required. On
June 28 , 1993 , the Council ' s Budget Committee
recommended that the staff be authorized to
prepare and distribute a Request for Proposals
(RFP) for the EIS. The RFP process will allow
the City to review the qualifications of various
consulting firms and help to establish a budget
for the project. JOHNSON MOVED to authorize the
preparation and distribution of a Request for
Proposals (RFP) for an Environmental Impact
Statement for the City ' s Comprehensive Plan and,
based on the results of the RFP process, develop
a budget for the project for consideration by
the City Council . White seconded and the motion
carried.
SEGREGATION (OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4D)
REQUESTS Segregation Request - LID 327 . The Public Works
Committee has recommended adoption of a resolu-
tion authorizing the segregation of Assessment
#45 in LID 327 , said parcels lying within Van
Doren' s Landing. This segregation is due to the
sale of the property by Birtcher Frank Proper-
ties . WHITE MOVED to adopt Resolution No. 1365
authorizing the segregation of Assessment #45 in
LID 327 and Assessment #7 in LID 330 . Orr sec-
onded and the motion carried.
(OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4E)
Segregation Request - LID 330 . The Public Works
Committee has recommended adoption of a resolu-
tion authorizing the segregation of Assessment
#7 in LID 330, said parcels lying within Van
Doren ' s Landing. This segregation is due to the
sale of the property by Birtcher Frank Proper-
ties. WHITE MOVED to adopt Resolution No. 1366
authorizing the segregation of Assessment #7 in
LID 330 . Bennett seconded and the motion car-
ried.
5
July 20 , 1993
CAPITAL (PUBLIC HEARING - ITEM 2A)
IMPROVEMENT 1994-1999 Capital Improvement Program. This
PROGRAM date has been set for the first of two public
hearings on the 1994-1999 Capital Improvement
Program. This year ' s program focuses on the
1994 component. Future years will be more
clearly defined following completion of the
City' s Capital Facilities Plan as a required
component of the Growth Management Act . The
1994 requests have been prioritized by City
Council and reviewed by the Council ' s Budget
Committee.
Acting Finance Director Miller pointed out that
the plan is not yet complete and the purpose of
this meeting is to receive input. She explained
that input received tonight will be taken to the
Budget Committee, and noted that after the pro-
jects in the program have been funded there will
still be approximately $1, 500 , 000 available for
next near. She outlined the projects and their
rankings as follows :
1. 1 Police Computer Upgrade
1 . 1 Corrections Major Maintenance Upgrade
1. 4 GIS Enhancements
2 . 2 Public Building Maintenance
2 . 3 ' Sidewalks Rehabilitation
2 . 8 Senior Activity Center/Res Ctr Bus
3 . 1 Citywide Personal Computer Upgrades
3 . 3 In City Transit
3 . 6 Park and Recreation Comp Plan/Update
3 . 6 EIS for Growth Mgt
3 . 6 Document Imaging Expansion
3 . 7 New applications : Cashiering/Permitting
4 . 3 Commuter Rail Facility
4 . 6 Transitional Housing for Single Men
4 . 6 City Hall Alarm System
4 . 6 Commons Air Conditioning
5 . 1 Central Computer System Enhancements
5. 1 Automation/Local-Area-Networks
5. 1 Emergency Power for Two Fire Stations
5. 9 Play Area Modernization
6. 1 Municipal Court
6 . 4 Seal Coating
6 . 6 Hearing Prot. /Apparatus Intercom/Warning
6 . 6 Vehicle Maint. Service Vehicle Replace.
6 . 6 Paint Exterior of Stations & Mtc Fac.
6 . 7 Teen/Youth Center (Bond ' 94 )
6 . 9 Downtown Parking Garage - Smith
6 . 9 Downtown Parking Garage - Titus
6 . 9 Fire Tower Burn Props
6 . 9 1974 Pumper Replacement
7 . 1 1985 Engine/Aid Replacement
6
July 20, 1993
CAPITAL Miller said that projects from the Street Fund,
IMPROVEMENT the Water and Sewer Fund, the Golf Course Fund
PROGRAM and the Equipment Rental Fund are also included.
She added that a reserve fund for replacement of
fire equipment will be set up, as well as a fund
for replacement of outdated computer equipment.
The Mayor opened the public hearing. Bill
Doolittle noted that with funds from various
sources totaling $360, 000 and $150 , 000 from the
City, there is approximately $500, 000 available
for transitional housing for single men, and
asked how it would be used. Planning Director
Harris explained that the City is looking for a
piece of property. Doolittle urged the Council
to consider putting off the air conditioning in
Kent Commons, since there are rumors about the
permanence of the Commons at it ' s present site,
in light of the Regional Justice Center going in
nearby.
Phyllis Farrow spoke in support of the City ' s
purchase of a 24-passenger air-conditioned van
for the Senior Center. She noted that the vans
being used by the Center both have poor ventila-
tion and are difficult to move around in. She
added that since the vans can carry only up to
fourteen passengers, more trips must be made
bringing seniors to the Center, and consequently
some are not able to participate in morning
activities and may not arrive in time for lunch.
There were no further comments and WHITE MOVED
to continue the public hearing on the 1994-1999
Capital Improvement Program to the August 3rd
Council meeting. Johnson seconded and the
motion carried.
TEEN RECREATION (OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4C)
Project Lighthouse Proposal. The Project Light-
house Board has requested that the City of Kent
fund a teen recreation program two afternoons/
evenings per week in the amount of $45 , 222 .
Cheryl Fraser of the Parks and Recreation
Department explained that Project Lighthouse is
proposing a starter recreation program to be
held at Sequoia Junior High beginning in August
and lasting through December of this year. She
said the program focuses on young people between
the ages of 13 and 19 , and the goal is to draw
between 100 and 200 teenagers each day. She
added that the program will offer recreation,
7
July 20, 1993
TEEN RECREATION education, and social service programs when it
is fully operating. She noted that the City' s
contribution would pay for adding four recrea-
tion leaders, increasing the Youth-at-Risk
Coordinator ' s position from 3/4 time to full
time, providing police officers for community
policing and covering the cost of dances, music,
supplies, and sports . She asked that $27, 222
come from the General Fund and $18 , 000 come from
the Criminal Justice Fund. She noted that Pro-
ject Lighthouse has received funding from King
County, the Kent School District and Kent Valley
Youth and Family Services .
Diane Lewis, Project Lighthouse Director, ex-
plained that each agency which participates is
asked to develop some kind of contribution to
the project. She introduced representatives
from the Kent Police Department, the Kent School
District, Kent Community Foundation, Kent Area
Council PTA, Kent Youth and Family Services,
King County Police Department, Kent School
Board, Kent Ministerial Association, and Kent
Parks . She said they would also like the City
to be involved in the safekeeping of area youth.
BENNETT ' MOVED to approve the allocation of
$45, 222 ($27 , 222 General Fund and $18 , 000
Criminal Justice Fund) to fund the implementa-
tion of a teen recreation program in collabora-
tion with Project Lighthouse. Johnson seconded.
White pointed out that he had voted against this
in the Budget Committee. He commended staff for
looking at alternative funding and for providing
a more focused program, and said he will now
support the program. He added that although
this type of program is needed, he is concerned
about long-term funding. Bennett suggested that
an evaluation committee be formed to review the
program. There was no objection and it was so
ordered. Orr commented that this program could
work very well with Councilmember Mann' s com-
mittee on the Youth Center, and noted that this
type of program saves money in the long run.
She commended everyone involved in the program
and said the City can most likely find ways to
fund it in the future .
Bennett ' s motion then carried. Mayor Kelleher
thanked those involved, noting that they are
doing a great service to the community.
8
July 20, 1993
COUNCIL (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3C)
. Councilmembers Absences. APPROVAL of requests
from Councilmembers Mann and Houser for excused
absences from the July 20 , 1993 , City Council
meeting.
APPOINTMENTS (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3D)
Planning Commission Appointment. CONFIRMATION
of the Mayor ' s appointment of Janette Nuss to
serve as a member of the Kent Planning Commis-
sion. Ms. Nuss has lived in Kent for many years
and has had a long standing interest in Kent ' s
future. She will replace Linda Martinez, who
resigned, and her appointment will continue to
12/31/94 .
(CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3F)
Board of Adjustment Appointment. CONFIRMATION
of the Mayor ' s appointment of Doug Gesler to
serve as a member of the Kent Board of Adjust-
ment. Mr. Gesler has been a Kent resident for
many years and has been actively involved in the
community. He will replace Raul Ramos, who
resigned, and his appointment will continue to
2/23/96 .
FINANCE (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3B)
Approval of Bills . APPROVAL of payment of the
bills received through July 15, 1993 after
auditing by the Operations Committee at its
meeting on August 3 , 1993 .
Approval of checks issued for vouchers :
Date Check Numbers Amount
7/5-7/15 132220-132722 $2 , 032 , 543 . 48
Approval of checks issued for payroll :
Date Check Numbers Amount
7/20/93 Checks 185146-185569 $ 317 , 061. 54
Advices 8011-8415 $ 419 , 394 . 23
$ 736, 455 . 77
REPORTS Budget Committee. Johnson noted that the Budget
Committee will meet at 4 : 00 p.m. on Monday,
July 26 .
Administrative Reports. McCarthy noted that the
agenda packet contains a 6-page report on the
target issues and what has been accomplished on
them.
9
July 20, 1993
REPORTS He pointed out that the only issue on which
nothing has been done is impact fees, and noted
that the Capital Facilities Plan will help de-
cide whether they are needed. Orr stated that
they do need to be worked into the Capital
Facilities Program, which is why they have not
been addressed up to this point.
McCarthy noted that the City of Des Moines has
proposed to provide financial assistant to their
Sister City, Des Moines, Iowa and is asking
other cities for support. He said that Kelli
O ' Donnell in Administration will coordinate the
City' s efforts to help .
ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 8 : 15 p.m.
Brenda Jacober CM
City Clerk
10
Kent City Council Meeting
Date August 3 , 1993
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: MAR DEL INVESTMENT STREET VACATION
2 . SUMMARY ST EMENT: — As recommended b the Public Works-
Committee(, doption of Resolution N-o. T se--tting-
September 7th as the hearing date on the street vacation
petition, for a portion of property on 45th Place South. /
3 . EXHIBITS: Public Works Director Memo, Public Works minutes,
resolution and vicinity map
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (2-0 with phone approval
by Jim Bennett to place item on Consent Calendar)
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REOUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION•
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 3C
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
JULY 21 , 1993
TO: PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE
FROM: DON WICKSTROM V""
RE: MAR DEL - STREET VACATION
We have received a petition for street vacation, for a portion of
45th Place South from Mar Del Investment Company. As such, Council
must pass a resolution fixing the time when the petition shall be
heard and determined by them. Said time can be no longer than 60
days nor less than 20 days after the date of passage of the
resolution. To comply with the time constraints we recommend
setting September 7th as that date.
ACTION: Recommend adoption of Resolution setting September 7th as
the Public Hearing date for the Mar Del Street Vacation.
controlling the land use designation in SeaTac was discussed with
respect to high density apartments in that area . Brubaker said it
was previously discussed that we cannot contract away the rights of
the SeaTac City Council . Brubaker said that possibly we could, as
a contractural condition of extending service, not try to control
the land use designation but control amount of flow or amount of
residences to be served. He -said it would then be incumbent on the
city of SeaTac. White said that he is not sure whether we have the
right to tell another city what they do with their land use. He
further said that citizens in that city are paying for Metro in one
way or another so he questions why we Eire blocking them.
Johnson asked if we could grant a sewer extension and limit the
size of the capacity of the line . Wickstrom again stated that it
would be SeaTac ' s sewer and their force main, but would be in our
public right of way.
Committee directed staff to address the problem and come back to
the Committee with a workable recommendation.
DMar-Del Investment Street Vacation
Wickstrom said that this is a petition to vacate a piece of
property and as such requires a public hearing. He requested that
the hearing date be set for September 7th .
Committee unanimously recommended setting the public hearing for
September 7th.
T. I . P. - Presentation of Projects
Referring to the 194 through ' 99 project listing, Wickstrom said
that we did make a lot of changes in the first year, indicating on
a wall map which of the projects that had been rearranged. In
response to White ' s question on the time-line on the Reith Rd. &
Meeker St. widening project, Wickstrom said we have a proposal with
the state and are waiting for them to buy off on our proposal .
Wickstrom explained that one of the additions made to the first
year' s program was changing Canyon Drive to a Pedestrian and Bike
Lane project thinking we would probably get a better chance for a
grant. However, now the Federal money has been dictated and we are
not getting any money for that project.
White asked Wickstrom if a traffic signal at Russell Rd. & Meeker
St. "fits in" with this category of projects . Wickstrom stated
that it will be in one of our six year T. I . P. s.
Wickstrom said that we will have to do some adjusting in order to
move our 212th St. project up. He said we have submitted for a
grant application and it looks like we will get some money. In
response to White ' s question on grade separation, Wickstrom said we
put that in the list to get some interest from it. He said that
2
CITY OF KENT 1� \�
CITY CLERK
S 89'1029 E _
J0.00'
—10' SI RM DR 1W
un rnvEM UII I —Y 7.d3.10
F:ND CUI20 -- — — — -- — ---- ---- --- —
kn
t
P � I
to I �� w t Md .
ocy
Is
I
;•, ,a- I /
I
ZI
N I
h / ui LIJ
U 2,15.01 / I
J is --
o
if b /
v
h En;l 2 5.17
61
30.00
————
� \_� \
2A6.50 \ \
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the
City of Kent, Washington, regarding the
vacation of a portion of 45th Place South as
petitioned for by Mar Del Investment Company,
owners of property abutting upon said street
sought to be vacated, and setting a public
hearing on the proposed street vacation for
September 7 , 1993 .
WHEREAS , a proper petition has been filed by Mar Del
Investment Company, owners of property abutting portions of 45th
Place South, to vacate a portion thereof to allow for appropriate
setbacks for the construction of single family residential on
Lot 6, Block 1 of Pierce' s lst Addition in Kent, King County,
Washington; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS :
Section 1. A public hearing on the street vacation
petition (attached hereto with related documents as Exhibit A and
incorporated herein by this reference) shall be held at a regular
meeting of the Kent City Council at 7 o' clock p.m. , Tuesday,
September 7 , 1993 , in the Council Chambers of City Hall located at
220 Fourth Avenue South, Kent, Washington 98032 .
Section 2 . The City Clerk shall give proper notice of
hearing and cause the notice to be posted as provided by law.
Section 3 . The Planning Director shall obtain the
necessary approval or rejection or other information from the
Public Works Department and other appropriate departments, and
shall transmit information to the Council so that the Council may
consider the matter at its regularly scheduled meeting on
September 7 , 1993 .
Passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Kent, Washington this day of , 1993 .
Concurred in by the Mayor of the City of Kent, this
day of , 1993 .
DAN KELLEHER, MAYOR
ATTEST:
BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ROGER A. LUBOVICH, CITY ATTORNEY
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of
Resolution No. passed by the City Council of the City of
Kent, Washington, the day of 1993 .
(SEAL)
BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK
vacate.res
2
HAIL TO: ',"IN rpll ;
Gerald B. MCC `1(I r !jam, r6_i Dcl Invesuncnt Canp uiy
CITY OF Y.ENT U
220 So, 4th Ave. U add'es::_ C!0 I20PGR'r D. S7ZC7.'1ICK
Kent, WA 90032 JUN 2 9 1993 W. Thus, ICenC, WA. 98032
CITY OF KENT
CITY CLERK Phone: oc) 35n-0110
STREET AND/OR ALLEY VACATION APPLICATION AND PETITION
Dear Mayor and Kent City Council :
Ile, the undersigned abutting property owners, hereby respectfully request that
certain right of way hereby be vacated. (General Location)
Legal Description
abat portion of 45th Place South right-of-way lying east of a line ccmnencing at
the Northwest corner of Lot 6, Block 1, Pierce's first addition according to the plat
thereof recorded in Vol-tune 65 of Plats, cage 75, F'rcords of King County, Washington
and described as follows:
Beginning at said Northwest corner of. said Iot 6; thence a distance of
110.79 feet, -,tore or less, to the Southwest corner of said Lot 6 and the
terminus of said described line; comprising an area of 1703.25 square feet_
BRIEF STATEMENT IIHY VACATION I; BEING SOUGHT
Determination has been made by the City of Kent di,r.ing HD street inTrovenents
that the portion of 45th Place South fon,nick vacation is sought, is no longer
necessary for public right-of-way. (See site plan.)
Sufficient proof, copy of deed contract etc. supported by King County
Tax Rolls shall be submitted for verification of signatures. Without
these a "CURRENT" title report shall be required. When Corporations ,
Partnerships etc. are being signed for, then proof of individual 's
authority to sign for same shall also be submitted.
Attach a color coded map of a scale of not less than 1" = 200' of the area
sought for vacation. (NOTE) Map must correspond with legal description.
ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS_ TAX LOT 9
SIGNATURES AND ADDRESSES LOT, BLOCK & PLAT/SEC. MI. RG
I'l LKa P c�,M
CA VJ
$150.00 Fee Paid Treasurer's Receipt No.
Appraisal Fee Paid Treas;nrer's Receipt No.
Land Value Paid Treasurer's Receipt No.
Deed Accepted Dace_
Trade Accepted Date
5224-33A EXHIBIT.._._:
Kent City Council Meeting
Date August 3 , 1993
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: COMMUTE TRIP REDUCTION PROGRAM FOR CITY EMPLOYEES
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Approval of the CTR program and direc-
tion to all departments to initiate those measures necessary in
order to bring the City into compliance with the Commute Trip
Reduction Act.
The recent Commute Trip Reduction legislation requires the
development of a CTR program. The City has developed a program
which identifies those measures needed to attain the necessary
reduction in its single occupancy vehicle (SOV) trips.
3 . EXHIBITS: Public Works Director memo, recommended CTR Program
and Public Works minutes
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (2-0 with phone approval
by Jim Bennett to place item on Consent Calendar)
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO �< YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 3D
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
JULY 211 1993
TO: PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE
FROM: DON WICKSTROM V
RE: COMMUTE TRIP REDUCTION PROGRAM FOR CITY EMPLOYEES
As a result of the recent Commute Trip Reduction legislation, the
City of Kent is required to develop a CTR program which identifies
those measures needed to attain the necessary reduction in its
single occupancy vehicle (SOV) trips .
The Public Works Department is requesting that Council approve the
following program and direct all departments to initiate those
measures necessary in order to bring the City into compliance with
the Commute Trip Reduction Act.
ACTION: Recommend Council approval for CTR Program.
llJ-1. 7-)A ,ML,1N`I' OP' PUL'LIC WORKS
July 7_, 199
TO: Tony McCarthy, Chief Administrative Officer
cc: Don Wickstrom
FROM: Dick Gillisse, CTR Program Coordinator
RE: Commute Trip Reduction Program for City Employees
After several months of planning and discussion, I have prepared a proposed Commute
Trip Reduction Program for City employees. Listed below are the elements which I am
recommending be initially included in the program:
1. Carpooling by employees will be encourarea by providing ridematching services
to assist in identifying potential carpool partners.
2. Six of the City's leased parking spaces in the Centennial Building garage will
be reserved for carpool parking only. Per Zits to use these spaces will be
issued. Additional spaces will be added as the demand warrants.
3. Employees who regularly commute by bus v:ill be reimbursed 1/2 the cost of a
monthly bus pass.
4. Employees will be encouraged to adopt compressed work-week schedules which
lead to a reduction in the nuinber of da}-s v;orked.
5. A quarterly newsletter will be published for to all employees encouraging
alternative commute methods.
6. Employees who regularly leave their car at home 3 or more days per week will
be provided a free Guaranteed Ride Home in case of emergency. Such rides
will be provided by another employee or taxi.
7. Secure, covered bicycle racks will be installed at all major City work sites and
plans for additional shower/locker facilities will be developed.
S. Periodic promotional activities encouragg in alternative commute modes will be
conducted. Prizes and promotional materials will be provided at these events.
9- The program will be made available to all full-time City omplo�ces.
Tony McCarthy
June 30, 1993
Page 2
According to the information I have reviewed, none of these programs will require
changes or additions to the existing City budget or policies. Resources are available
through State-provided CTR grant funds to irapleme;it the recommended program
through June 1994.
As this will be an ongoing, dynamic program, various additional elements may be
necessary in future years if trip reduction goals ar no, met. Future additions may
include reducing the supply of employee parking, c;)arging employees for parking,
providing City owned vehicles for commuting, and incentive payments to employees who
reduce commute trips.
A copy of the City's program must be submitted to the State Energy Office by August 2,
1993. I am in the process of preparing an annour_c-,�ment of the program for employees
and various promotional materials.
Please let me know by July 9, 1993 if the initial elements listed above meet the
approval of the City Administration.
there is $1 billion dollars of federal money around and only five
systems in the U. S . that it can be spent on. White asked if the
Regional Transit Authority is going to have input on that.
Wickstrom said he thinks it would go for grade separations and its
improving the rail for high speed trains running from Eugene,
Oregon to Vancouver B. C. Wickstrom said they want to get it above
125 mph and to do this they need grade separations . Wickstrom said
that knowing the money is out there and also we may not see it in
six years, we need to let people know we need some .
In response to White ' s question on S. 256th between 104th & 116th,
Wickstrom said that the County has received a grant and we are
waiting for them to make the improvement. Then we will be in a
better position to get a grant from TIIJ to fund it .
DCommute Trip Reduction Program for City Employees
Gillissee explained that being a major employer of over 100 people,
we have to follow our own ordinance . He said that 90% of our
employees drive alone to work and we have to reduce that down to
72% by 1995 . In so doing, we need to provide some form of
encouragement and formal program in which we can effectively change
the way employees commute. Gillissee has put together a suggested
program of nine steps to be implemented . In response to White ' s
question on the monthly bus pass reimbursement, Gillissee said that
several companies are starting out their programs with 1/2 the cost
of monthly bus pass reimbursement rather than full reimbursement.
Regarding the adoption of the compressed work-week schedule,
Gillissee stated that nine 80 ' s have keen suggested, rather than
four 10 ' s. McCarthy said that if we go ahead with the compressed
work-week, he wants the schedules staggered so that no more than
25% of the people in any one department would take any one day off.
Gillissee said that his prepared plan indicates that State funding
provided for CTR, will provide resources needed to carry the
program through June 1994 . He said that this is really June of
193 . He said the first two years the funds received from the State
were a grant that could be used by the City for anything having to
do with CTR. However, starting in July of this year, it is no
longer a grant fund; it is an appropriation and part of the
provision of that is that it cannot be used by the city to fund the
program for their own employees specifically.
Committee unanimously approved the CTR Program.
High Capacity Transportation Grant
Wickstrom said that essentially this is establishing a budget for
a grant we have received in the amount of $37 , 000 . Wickstrom said
the total project is $46 , 250 and we need authorization to establish
3
Kent City Council Meeting
Date August 3 , 1993
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: HIGH CAPACITY TRANSPORTATION GRANT
2 . SUMMARY STA EMEN : Tki,, hAs recommended by the Public Works �m�n Hee •�
thorization for the Mayor to sign t e interlocal
agreement for the High Capacity Transportation Grant and to
establish the budget for same, should this funding become
available from Metro. The grant fund is in the amount of
$37 , 000.
3 . EXHIBITS: Public Works Director Memo and Public Works Minutes
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (2-0 with phone approval
by Jim Bennett to glace item on Consent Calendar)
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES _
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommendedl�A Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REOUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS :
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 3E
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
JULY 21 , 1993
TO: PUBLIC WORKS CO7TTEE
FROM: DON WICKSTROM
RE: REGIONAL TRANSIT PROJECT
STATE HIGH CAPACITY TRANSPORTATION GRANT
The City of Kent has received notification from Metro of the status
of our High Capacity Transit Account grant application. Attached
is a letter from Metro outlining the process and status .
The Public Works Department is requesting that Council authorize
the Mayor to sign the interlocal agreement and establish a budget,
should this funding become available to the City. I have also
included the original application for your information.
ACTION: Recommend establishment of a project budget and authorize
the Mayor to sign agreement.
%'METRO Sul_ �_� ���(J��.
Municipality ofMetropoh Ian Scattic DEN.
lxch all pe building • 321 Second Ave_ �k!attle, WA 9 8 1 01-1 593 (206) 634-2100
July 12, 1993
Mr. Ed White
Engineering Department
City of Kent
200 4th Avenue South
Kent, Washington 98032
REGIONAL TRANSIT PROJECT
State High Capacity Transportation Grants
1993 — 1995 Biennium:
Grant Funding for Pass-Through Grants;
Dear Mr. White:
The purpose of the this letter is to inform you of the status of the High Capacity
Transit Account grant funding. The State awarded Metro HCT grant funds for only
the first fiscal year of the state biennium FY 1993-1994 (July 1 , 1993 to June 30,
1994). We received funding requests from a number of jurisdictions and these
requests exceeded the amount of funds identified for pass-through grants. In order
to keep within the available amount in the grant allocation, all grant requests were
reduced by 16.3 percent. The impact of this on your request is as follows:
Recalculation of Kent HCT Grant Request with 16.3 % Reduction
1993-1994 Biennium
FY 1993-1994
State HCT Grant Funds $ 37,000
Local Match Requirement - Kent (20) 9,250
Total F;equest: $ 46,250
On July 15, 1993 we are scheduled to present for adoption by the Metro Council a
resolution authorizing Metro to enter into interlocal agreemenis for the purpose of
providing pass-through State HCT grant funds. When this authorization is
received, we will begin execution of an interlocal agreement effective for the period
from July 1 , 1993 through June 30, 1994. We will need to attach your proposed
scope of work, revised as necessary given the regional transit project status to the
interlocal agreement and budget changes.
r. Ld VJi I
July 12, 1
Page 2
q result of the decision by WSDOT to fund only tree first of the year biennium rneans
that vie Will have to go through another gmmt appl!cation process next spring for
funding of HCT activities in the second year.
If you have any questions, please give me a call at 684-1380.
Sincerely,
Susan Brennan
Regional Transit Project, Metro
M. Jean Baker, Metro
Gregg Schwieers, Metro
Paul Matsuoka, Metro
Chris Deffebach, Metro
HCT Grant Funding Request
1993 - 1995 Biennium
(July 1, 1993 - June 30 , 1995)
Jurisdiction: CITY OF KENT
Project Title: Kent Circulator Study
Funding Requested: $200 , 000
1st Year 2nd Year Total
State HCT Grant Funds $160 , 000 $ $160, 000
Local Match $40, 000 $ 1 $40 , 000
Total Project $200 , 000 $ $200, 000
Project Description:
Conduct a feasibility study to determine the best method of
providing the necessary linkages between local transit service and
the regional transit system. Followed by a demonstration project
to encourage transit ridership. The main objectives of this
project would be to:
1 . Reduce congestion on local arterial by providing a
convenient alternative to short auto trips from residential
areas to potential HCT and Commuter Rail sites near the
City's downtown core.
2 . Encourage the use of public transportation by identifying
alternative methods for commuting through the use existing
transit programs.
3 . Increase the amount of transit service currently being
provided to the Kent area.
Explanation of conformance with the proposed Regional Transit Plan:
This project will meet the goals of the Regional Transit Plan in
the following manner:
1 . By connecting local and regional activity centers with
high capacity transit.
2 . By connecting residential areas with activity centers
through expanded transit service.
HCT Grant Funding Request
1993 - 1995 Biennium
(July 1, 1993 - June 30 , 1995)
Project Title: Kent Circulator Study
(Complete one page for each task)
Task Description/Budget:
Task No. 1
Description:
Conduct a feasibility study to determine the best method of
providing the necessary linkages between local transit service
and the regional transit system. Major elements of this study
are to include the following:
1 . Demographic survey and inventory to determine size and
character of potential service area.
2 . Identify potential service modes (i . e. shuttle, Park &
Ride, DART, etc. ) to be used in determining service
alternatives.
3 . Analyze impacts of future HCT station facility locations in
relation to service alternatives identified above.
4 . Evaluate potential service alternatives .
5 . Prepare supporting documentation for future
pilot/demonstration project.
Product:
Documentation supporting an area wide circulator system
demonstration project in the Kent area.
3 . By identifying and promoting programs to encourage transit
use.
Description of projected improvement in regional mobility:
Though not directly impacting regional mobility, this project will
provide a better means of access to the regional system. In this
way the system will be available to a larger segment of the
population in the Kent area .
Budget: $55, 000
Cost Categories: ist earl 2nd Year Total
Consultant Services $49 , 500 $ $49 , 500
Staff $5, 500 $ $5 , 500
Other $ $ $
Total $55, 000 $ $55, 000
Funding Sources 2_st Year 2nd Year Total
State HCT Grant $44 , 000 $ $44 , 000
Local Match $11 , 000 $ $11, 000
HCT Grant Funding Request
1993 - 1995 Biennium
(July 1, 1993 - June 30, 1995)
Project Title: Kent Circulator Study
(Complete one page for each task)
Task Description/Budget:
Task No. 2
Description:
Based upon recommendations from feasibility study implement a
demonstration project for the greater Kent area. This project
shall be designed using information developed through the
aforementioned study for a period of approximately six months
after which an evaluation of the effectiveness of this project
will be done. The objectives of this project are to:
1. Help reduce congestion by providing a convenient
alternative to vehicular trips .
2 . Encourage public transportation commuting from East & West
Hills to transit facilities (HCT & Commuter Rail) in the
Kent CBD.
3 . Enhance the image and visibility of Metro in the Kent area.
4 . Provide a convenient introduction to the transit system to
non-transit users.
5. Improve Non-SOV accessibility in many areas of Kent and
enhance the pedestrian environment.
6. Demonstrate Kent's commitment to working with Metro and
other groups to solve it's transportation problems .
Product:
Upon successful completion of this project an effective
implementation strategy can be formed leading to an increased
level of transit service for the greater Kent area.
Budget: $145 , 000
Cost Categories: 1st Year _2nd Year Total
Consultant Services $136 , 000 $ $136 , 000
Staff $9 , 000 $9 , 000
Other $ a $
Total $145, 000 $ $145 , 000
Funding Sources 1st Year 2nd Year Total
State HCT Grant $116 , 000 $ $116 , 000
Local Match $29 , 000 $ $29 , 000
there is $1 billion dollars of federal money around and only five
systems in the U. S. that it can be spent on. White asked if the
Regional Transit Authority is going to have input on that.
Wickstrom said he thinks it would go for grade separations and its
improving the rail for high speed trains running from Eugene,
Oregon to Vancouver B. C. Wickstrom said they want to get it above
125 mph and to do this they need grade separations . Wickstrom said
that knowing the money is out there and also we may not see it in
six years, we need to let people know we need some.
In response to White ' s question on S. 256th between 104th & 116th,
Wickstrom said that the County has received a grant and we are
waiting for them to make the improvement. Then we will be in a
better position to get a grant from TIB to fund it .
Commute Trip Reduction Program for Citv Employees
Gillissee explained that being a major employer of over 100 people,
we have to follow our own ordinance. He said that 90% of our
employees drive alone to work and we have to reduce that down to
72% by 1995 . In so doing, we need to provide some form of
encouragement and formal program in which we can effectively change
the way employees commute . Gillissee has put together a suggested
program of nine steps to be implemented. In response to White ' s
question on the monthly bus pass reimbursement, Gillissee said that
several companies are starting out their programs with 1/2 the cost
of monthly bus pass reimbursement rath:�r than full reimbursement.
Regarding the adoption of the compressed work-week schedule,
Gillissee stated that nine So ' s have been suggested, rather than
four 101s. McCarthy said that if we go ahead with the compressed
work-week, he wants the schedules staggered so that no more than
25% of the people in any one department would take any one day off .
Gillissee said that his prepared plan indicates that State funding
provided for CTR, will provide resources needed to carry the
program through June 1994 . He said that this is really June of
193 . He said the first two years the funds received from the State
were a grant that could be used by the City for anything having to
do with CTR. However, starting in July of this year, it is no
longer a grant fund; it is an appropriation and part of the
provision of that is that it cannot be used by the City to fund the
program for their own employees specifically.
Committee unanimously approved the CTR Program.
DHigh Capacity Transportation Grant
Wickstrom said that essentially this is establishing a budget for
a grant we have received in the amount of $37 , 000 . Wickstrom said
the total project is $46 , 250 and we need authorization to establish
3
the budget for same.
committee unanimously agreed to establish project budget and
authorize the Mayor to sign the agreement.
Kent City Council Meeting
Date August 3 , 1993
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: CENTRAL AVENUE & PIONEER STREET PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: s recommended by the Public Work ---
Committee, uthorizat n for the Mayor to sign the City/County
agreement for the pe estrian actuated traffic signal at the
intersection of Central Ave. & Pioneer St. and to establish the
budget for samelV Grant funding is available in the amount of
$27 , 000 .
3 . EXHIBITS: Public Works Director memo and Public Works minutes
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (2-0 with phone approval
by Jim Bennett to place item on Consent Calendar)
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES X
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommendeddn+v\ Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 3F
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
July 16, 1993
TO: Public Works Committee
FROM: Don Wickstrom 071
RE: Central Avenue and Pioneer Street
Pedestrian Signal
The Public Works Department is requesting that Council authorize
the Mayor to sign the City/County Agreement for the above
referenced project. The primary purpose of this project is to
install a pedestrian actuated traffic signal at the intersection of
Central Avenue and Pioneer Street. This will allow pedestrians to
safely cross Central Avenue near the Kent Junior High School .
Grant funding from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) for
this project is available in the amount of $27 , 000 . The Mayor has
previously signed this agreement therefore, this action is only to
establish the budget.
ACTION: Authorize the signing of the Agreement and establishment of
the budget for same.
Washington State 7ranspo 4/'1n 6uild�nq
11 o (�oz ny3oo
Department of Transportation olympo.vn;9"M4 7300
Duane Berentson
Secretary of Transp(,,r1a','0" May 11 1993
CITY OF KEN 1
Mr. Don Wickstrom MAY 14 1993
Public Works Director E NGMEEF IN6 0E ''i
220 Fourth Avenue South
Kent, WA 98032
City of Kent
Central Avenue/Pioneer Street
STPH-1073(003)
FUND AUTHORIZATION
Dear Mr. Wickstrom:
We have received FHWA fund authorization, effective April 7, 1993, for this
project as follows:
PHASE TOTAL FEDERALSHARE
Preliminary Engineering $2,500 $2,250
In addition, categorical exclusion determination has been approved.
Enclosed for your information and file is a fully executed copy of City/County
Agreement LA-2061 between the state and your agency. Also enclosed is a
pre-printed Progress Bill form for the referenced project. Please forward this
form to the person handling billings.
Federal funds for this project are limited to $27,000. All costs beyond those in
the latest executed agreement are the sole responsibility of your agency.
Upon receipt of a supplement to the City/County Agreement which includes
construction funds, the construction phase of this project will be considered for
funding.
You may proceed with the administration of this project in accordance with your
WSDOT approved Certification Acceptance agreement.
Sincerely,
WAYNE T. GRUEN, PE
Local Programs Engineer
WTG:lg
LC R
Enclosure
cc: Terry Paananen, Dist. 1, NB82/121
)L(,
L�
Woshinglon State Deportment of 7rnnsportollon
w.s.D.O.T.USE ONLY
FEDERAL AID PROJECT NUMBER
AGENCY NAME L BILLING ADDRESS ,\
WASHINGTON STATE SI PlrA - 10� '� � OU �' )
2 2 0 �a 2�� �`l-`, �-
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AGREEMENT NUMBER
CITY/COUNTY AGREEMENT CA 2 O L 1
The Local Agency having complied, or hereby agreeing to comply, with the terms and conditions set forth in (1) Title 23, U.S.
Code Highways, (2) the regulations issued pursuant thereto, (3) Office of Management and Budget Circulars A-102 and
A-128, (4)the policies and procedures promulgated by the Washington State Department of Transportation and, (5) the Fed-
eral-aid Project Agreement entered into between the State and Federal Government, relative to the above project, the Wash
ington. State Department of,Transportation will authorize the Local Agency to proceed.on the project by a separate .
notification. Federal funds which are to be obligated for the project may not exceed the amount shown herein on line s., col-
umn (3) without written authority by the State, subject to the approval of the Federal Highway Administrator. All project costs
not reimbursed by the Federal Government shall be the responsibility of the Local Agency.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Name -
Central Ave at Pioneer St Intersection Hazard Elimination Length 0. 1 mi .
---
Termini 100 ft. north of Pioneer St to 100 ft. south of Pioneer St. on Central Ave.
1 t. east o entra ve. to t. west o entra ve. on loneer
Description of Work
Design multi-phase traffic signal . Including protected pedestrian indications .
ESTIMATE_ OF FUNDING
TYPE OF WORK (E I (D) (3)
ESTIMATED TOTAL ESTIMATED AGENCY ESTIMATED
PROJECT FUNDS FUNDS FEDERAL FUNDS
P.E. a. Agency Work .....20.00.......... ..........209........ ......17.9.1.........
b. Other ........................
C. State Services 500 41 459
d. Total PE Cost Estimate (a+b+c) 2500 250 2250
Right-of-Way e. Agency Work
f. Other ....................:...
g. State Services
h. Total R/W Cost Estimate (e+f+g)
Construction i. Contract . ••---- - -�����••��•• -�••-���-�--"'--�"---'
......................
j. Other .......................
k. Other ........................ ........................
I. Other
m. Total Contract Costs (i+j+k+l)
Construction Engineering
n. Agency ..... ............ ........................
o. Other ........................ ........................
p. State Forces
q. Total Const. Engineering (n+o+p)
r. ' Total Const. Cost Estimate (m+q)
S. TOTAL COST ESTIMATE
OF THE PROJECT(d+h+r) 2500 250 2250
'Federal participation In Construction Engineering(q)Is limited to 15%of lho lotal Contract Costs. (line m,column 3)
The Federal-aid participation rate in this project will be determined by the Federal Government.The parties expect that it will be—Y0__°�
however, It Is understood that the rate may vary. The Local Agency agrees that this agreement is entered without relying upon any
representation by the State made outside of this contract,or contained herein, as to what the Federal participation rate will be. It further
agrees that It will not conditlon any future actions with respect to the project covered by this agreement upon past, current, or futuro
representations as to the Federal participation rate.The dollar amount of Fedoras participation cannot exceed the amount shown in lino
s., column (3),All costs not reimbursed by the Federal Government shall be the.responsibility of the Local Agency.
CONSTRUCTION METHOD OF FINANCING .
(Check Method Selected)
STATE AD&AWARD "......•••.
METHOD A Advance Payment-Agency Share of Total Construction Cost(Based on Contract Award)......................... ( )
METHOD B Withhold From Gas Tax the Agency's Share of Total Construction Cost (lino r.,cot.months....................................( )
•• in the amount of$ '•
at$ per month for_
LOCAL FORCE OR,LOCAL AD&AWARD ..
'THOD C' _Agency Cost Incurred with Patlial Reimbursement
and
icies and procedures,
said
le
The Local Agency ffihelFedePal funds,ofJpgatednit to
land3v II complytw t11 the'lapplicable provisions Set dforth below.
lion to payment 9 Resolution/Ordinance No.
Adop d by official action OR.',' -
AGENC OFFI,-11
^\ t . WASHINGTON STATE
l � DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
8Y: „�V-1
CHAIRMAN,County Commissioners or Mayor
BY: _
Assistant secretary for Local Program,
_ APR I. 1993
Date Ezeculed
PROVISIONS
V COMPLIANCE WITH PROVISIONS
I SCOPE OF WORK
The Agency shall not incur any Federal
The Agency shall provide all the work, labor, materials and services -aid participation costs on any
necessary to perform the project which is described and set forth in detail classification of work on this project until authorized in writing are:
the State
in the"Project Description"and"Type of Work.'.
for each classification.The classifications of work for projects are:
When the State acts for and on behalf of the Agency,the Stale shall 1. Preliminary Engineering up to and including approval
be deemed an agent of the Agency and shall perform the services 2. Preparation of Plans, Specifications,and Estimates
described and indicated in"Type of Work-on the face of this agreement,in 3. Right-of-Way Acquisition
accordance with plans and specifications as proposed by the Agency and 4.In the event thattruction
Right-of-Way acquisition for,or actual construction of
approved by the State and Federal Highway Administration.
When the State acts-for the Agency but not subject to the right of con- the road for which Preliminary Engineering is undertaken is not started by
owin
trot by the Agency,the State shall have the right to part e agree-
orm the work subject the Tz testa execut of the ed,
fiscal Agency willyear repay t e the cState the su year in m or,sums of
to the ordinary procedures of the Stale and Federal Highway Adrninistra-
li. - Federal funds paid to the Agency under the terms of this agreement. (See
Section VIII.)
II DELEGATION OF AILTHORI Y The Agency agrees that all stages of construction necessary to pro-
vide the initially planned complete facility,within the limits of this project,will
The State is acting to fulfill the responsibilities to the Federal Govern- conform to at least the minimum values set by approved AASHTO design
ment by the administration of this project.The Agency agrees that the State standards applicable to this class of highways,even though such additional
k is finance v:ithout Federal-aid participation.
work shall have the full authority to carry out this administration. he State shall agrees that on Federal-aid highway construction projects
review, process and appoove documents required for Federal-aid reim-
The Agency
bursement in accordance with Federal requirements. If the State adver- the current Federal-aid regulations which apply to liquidated damages rel-
tises and awards the contract,the State will further act for the Agency in all ative to the basis of Federal participation in the project cost shall be appli-
matters concerning the oroject, as requested by the Agency. If the Local cable in the event the contractor fails to complete the contract within the
Agency advertises and awards the project the State shall review the work contract time.
to insure conformity with the approved plans and specifications.
VI PAYMENT AND PARTIAL REIMBURSEMENT
III PROJECT ADMINISTRATION The total cost of the project,including all review and engineering costs
Certain types of work and services shall be provided by the State on and other expenses of the State, is to be paid by the Agency and by the
this project as requested by the Agency and described in the 'Type of Federal Government. Federal funding shall be in accord with the Surface
Work-above. In addition, the State will furnish qualified personnel for the Transportalion Assistance Act 1978, Title 23, United States Code, as
supervision and inspection of the work in progress.On local agency adver- amended, and Office of 6fanagement and Budget Circulars he co and
lised and awarded projects,the supervision and inspection shall be limited A-128.The State shall not be ultimately responsible for any of the costs of
to ensuring al(work is in conformance with approved plans,specifications the project.The Agency shall be ultimately responsible for all costs associ-
and Federal-aid requirements.The salary of such engineer or other super- ated with the project which are not reimbursed by the Federal Government.
visor and all other salaries and costs incurred by Stale forces upon the Nothing in this agreement shall be construed as a promise by the Slate as
project will be'considered a cost thereof. All costs related to this project to the amount or nature of Federal participation in this project. . .
incurred by employees of the Stale in the customary manner on highway 1, Preliminary Engineering, Right of Way Acquisition and Audit
payrolls and.vauchers shall be charged as costs of the project. Costs.
The Agency will pay for Agency incurred costs on the project. Follow
-
W AVAILABILITY OF RECORDS .,. . ng such payments, vouchers shall be submitted to the Stale in the formal
All project records in support of all costs incurred and actual expendi- prescribed by the Stale, in quadruplicate, not more Than one per month.
;ures kept by the Agency, are to be maintained in accordance with prose- The Stale will reimburse the Agency up to the amount shown on the lace
articipation to the
dures prescribed by the Division of Municipal Corporations of the State of this ent Ihgteunh coullt sts arr d e�llYsahriblolablble era.p J fjr?p Federal arty allocable to this
Auc'" s Office, the U.S. Department of Transportalion and Washington Project, Ez rnditures !>y the (_peal Agency fort e establishment, mainle-
De, lonl of Transportation. The records shall be open to inspection byance, r oral adrninislrafion, supervision, and other overhead shall not
the Stale and Federal Government at all reasonable times and shall be J-
rclaincd and made available for such inspeclion for a period of not less he elig:!;le for Frdcr;l hartiapation. on
Than three years from the final payment of any Federal-aid funds to the I meat,thclSl�,h���hIlfbll Ifeor lFederal Gove inrurred ornmcntlforpelmburseomentrof
Agency.Copies of said records shall be furnished to the Slate and/or Fed- hose casts eGnhle_ for Federal participation to the extent that such costs .
oral Government upon request.
the budget for same.
Committee unanimously agreed to establish project budget and
authorize the Mayor to sign the agreement.
North 4th Avenue Street Rebuild - Bid
Wickstrom stated that this is a project where we are re-overlaying
4th Ave. , north of 228th using our ISTEA allocation for our overlay
money. He said that it will be bidding on August 3rd, the day of
the Council meeting and we would like to award it that same
evening, if the bids are within budget.
Committee unanimously agreed to place the North 4th Ave St Rebuild
project on the August 3rd Council agenda and to award the contract
if the bids are within budget.
196th St Corridor Bridge Over Mill Creek
Wickstrom explained that this is the bridge that goes into Western
Processing and in our subsequent work with PRPs we had the bridge
tested and the only thing it can support is pedestrian traffic. He
said that the bridge is on the 196th St right of way crossing Mill
Creek. He said if the bridge is torn down, access to Western
Processing will be off 72nd Ave. Wickstrom said we want to
demolish it and Western Processing will take care of the cleanup.
Committee unanimously agreed to the emergency demolition of the
bridge over Mill Creek.
DCentral Ave & Pioneer St Pedestrian Signal
Wickstrom stated that this is a signal pedestrian project on
Central & Pioneer by the Jr. High School, for which we were able to
get a grant in the amount of $27 , 000 . Wickstrom requested
authorization for the signing of the agreement and establishing the
budget for same. He stated that matching funds would come from the
James St Pedestrian Improvement.
Committee unanimously recommended authorization for signing the
agreement and establishing the budget for same.
In response to White, Lindell said the time-line on this would be
shortly after school begins .
Downtown Infrastructure Update
No comments on this item.
RoVal Woods Manor - Bill of Sale
Committee unanimously agreed to approve the bill of sale.
4
Kent City Council Meeting
Date August 3 1993
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: ROYAL WOODS MANOR - BILL OF SALE
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: A-_re-cQmmended by_the Public Works
Committee, cceptance�the bill of sale and warranty agree-
ment submitted by Vortex,,, Inc. , for continuous operation and
maintenance of 267 feet o watermain extension, 253 feet of
sanitary sewer extension, 255 feet of street improvements and
162 feet of storm sewers nd release of bonds after expiration
of the maintenance period, The project is located in the
vicinity of 108th Ave. SE and SE 264th St.
3 . EXHIBITS: Public Works Director memo, Public Works minutes and
vicinity map
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (2-0 with phone approval
by Jim Bennett to place item on Consent Calendar)
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 3G
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
JULY 211 1993
TO: PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE
FROM: DON WICKSTROM 1'1` )
RE: ROYAL WOODS MANOR - BILL OF SALE
Vortex, Inc. , the developer of Royal Woods Manor has completed the
water, sewer, street and storm improvements for this plat. The
Royal Woods Manor improvements are in the vicinity of 108th Ave SE
& SE 264th St.
ACTION: Recommend the bill of sale be accepted and bonds released
after the one year maintenance period.
.. ........... ' _.............»......_...._..
^3
W
< N5 n
w
-
w h SE 251 ST �• ,e xs �.
w <
ST a SE ND ST / SE 252ND PL„
EAST HILL w = x SE 253R[� ST
CENTER
F- e _ a z w
F,r,ch SE 252ND O N W J F N J
O Field ST a
SE 254TH N - a
515 + W ` W c5
a{ 1\ < S W
�'p KENT-MERIDIAN F j _'�" k rn $E
SR. Hi. SCHOOL v 'r-)0
SE 256TH ST /-
w x 29 28
30 N $ W,L :,z a /< s Sr TESN ENT S®
ADMINISTRATION L
x'"p q g '` r• o
4 'a
L.•i. J; W ehT� ' sli 59TH _
SE 260TH ST N 2605T k1hQ(fYST
9��6pTH P`-
SE 21
5
W < SEQU
PK OIA
c� N ) J R. H 1.
5 2i2110 ( SCHOOL
1P wF Athlp!ic CT O P
F < `FiPld
SE •2 TH ST r- SE 264THST 5�262
S 6 516
x � Y on
° PROJECT LOCATION SE265TH
w j Water SE 2 TH PL
< .Nesery ST
SE 267.TH
F w
W 7 w
S % SE 26sTH
SE 268TH `_' a SE 266TH P. ST \
F N W
SE 2697H 57
SryW
SE 270TH
�'r, •'r < $E ` 270TH ST
a
SE 270TH ST Sf, x c'Jo
F
PL m
SE 271ST
ST a °�
30 29 L SE 272NO ST 29 28 SE 272ND
-- -- - 2ND PL
32 W W W
31 3 2 � z
= W $E 274
SE 274TH ST
< < 27m • SE O 274TH
W W
W Y 1x- S $T W �0 N »
✓1 rt 4 f. >
` N <~T <
F SE .. 276TN S '
_ n K
NE TREE « L
El MENTARV BE 277TH 0 - « '
Hxp. SCHOOL r 1
O � xW
the budget for same.
Committee unanimously agreed to establish project budget and
authorize the Mayor to sign the agreement.
North 4th Avenue Street Rebuild - Bid
Wickstrom stated that this is a project where we are re-overlaying
4th Ave. , north of 228th using our ISTEA allocation for our overlay
money. He said that it will be bidding on August 3rd, the day of
the Council meeting and we would like to award it that same
evening, if the bids are within budget.
Committee unanimously agreed to place the North 4th Ave St Rebuild
project on the August 3rd Council agenda and to award the contract
if the bids are within budget.
196th St Corridor Bridge Over Mill Creek
Wickstrom explained that this is the bridge that goes into Western
Processing and in our subsequent work with PRPs we had the bridge
tested and the only thing it can support is pedestrian traffic. He
said that the bridge is on the 196th St right of way crossing Mill
Creek. He said if the bridge is torn down, access to Western
Processing will be off 72nd Ave. Wickstrom said we want to
demolish it and Western Processing will take care of the cleanup.
Committee unanimously agreed to the emergency demolition of the
bridge over Mill Creek.
Central Ave & Pioneer St Pedestrian Signal
Wickstrom stated that this is a signal pedestrian project on
Central & Pioneer by the Jr. High School , for which we were able to
get a grant in the amount of $27 , 000 . Wickstrom requested
authorization for the signing of the agreement and establishing the
budget for same. He stated that matching funds would come from the
James St Pedestrian Improvement.
Committee unanimously recommended authorization for signing the
agreement and establishing the budget for same.
In response to White, Lindell said the time-line on this would be
shortly after school begins.
Downtown Infrastructure Update
No comments on this item.
DRoyal Woods Manor - Bill of Sale
Committee unanimously agreed to approve the bill of sale.
4
Kent City Council Meeting
Date August 3 , 1993
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Confirmation of the Mayor' s appointments
of Janer Wilford and Constance Stockton to serve as members of
the Kent Human Services Commission.
Ms. Wilford is in charge of arranging for emergency services
for Kent residents and the homeless through St. James Episcopal
Church and works with the Kent Distribution Center for the
Salvation Army Emergency Funds. She has been an active member
of St. James Episcopal Church for more than 15 years and will
represent the religious category. Ms . Wilford will replace
Peter Duggan who resigned. Her appointment will continue to
1/95 .
Ms. ockt0n is employed at Kent Youth and Family Services as
Assista Director and is a member of Kent Soroptimists. She
will repre ent the service club category and will replace Dee
Moschel whoseterm expired. Her appointment will continue to
1/1/96 .
3 . EXHIBITS: Memo from Mayor Kelleher
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Mayor Kelleher
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 3H
MEMORANDUM
TO: JUDY WOODS, CITY COUNCIL
PRESIDENT
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: DAN KELLEHER, MAYOR �,.,r,���-`--�•'�
DATE: JULY 22, 1993
SUBJECT: APPOINTMENT OF JANER WILFORD TO KENT HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION
I have recently appointed Janer Wilford to serve as a member of the Kent Human Services
Commission. Ms. Wilford is in charge of arranging for emergency services for Kent residents and
the homeless through St. James Episcopal Church and works with the Kent Distribution Center for
the Salvation Army Emergency Funds. Ms. Wilford is a long-time Kent resident and has been an
active member of St. James Episcopal Church for more than 15 years: She will represent the
religious category. She will replace Peter Duggan,who resigned, and her appointment will continue
to 1/1/95.
I submit this for your confirmation.
DK:jb
MEMORANDUM
TO: JUDY WOODS, CITY COUNCIL ESIDENT
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: DAN KELLEHER, MAYOR �•---�. �` ��
DATE: JULY 21, 1993
SUBJECT: APPOINTMENT OF CONSTANCE STOCKTON TO KENT HUMAN SERVICES
COMMISSION
I have recently appointed Constance Stockton to serve as a member of the Kent Human Services
Commission. Ms. Stockton is employed by Kent Youth and Family Services as Assistant Director and
has also served as Special Programs Coordinator at Green River College. Ms. Stockton is a member
of Kent Soroptimists and will represent the Service Clubs category. She will replace Dee Moschel,
whose term expired. Ms. Stockton's appointment will continue to 1/1/96.
I submit this for your confirmation.
DK:jb
Kent City Council Meeting
Date August 3 , 1993
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: DOWNTOWN PARTNERSHIP FUNDING, 1993 wY
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT:
authorization j-196p� to
a approve the 993 budge change
or $7 , 000 to fund the balance of the 1993 project The Kent
Downtown Partnership has met the matching fund goal of the
$25 , 000 from the community which funded the organization
through August 1993 . The Budget Committee recommended approval
of this request for continued financial support of their effort
to accomplish new programs for the business community both for
now and the future.
This budget is expected to promote and market programs for Kent
that would increase the ability to positively impact the local
economy. The 1994 request for $32 , 000 for matching fundSfor
the downtown partnership program in 1994 will be considered as
a portion of the 1994 budget process. Downtown redevelopment
has been a major priority with City Administration and top
Council target issue. Over the last few years, this simple
program has w%t resulte�in over $200 million in private and
public funding commitments which are now resulting in wholesale
rebuilding of Kent ' s downtown.
3 . EXHIBITS•
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Budget Committee 3-0
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ � 1
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 3I
KENT
Downtown
P A R T N E R S H I P
July 20, 1993
hh-. Jon Johnson
City of Kent Council
220 4th Ave. South
Kent, Wa. 98032
Dear Jon:
Attached is our budget for the balance of 1993 along with our 1994 budget proposal. We
have appreciated the strong partnership and commitment the City has shown to the
economic development programs we have been developing. We continue to face many
new challenges if we are to influence our ability_ to help our Bent businesses in the future.
The Kent Downtown Partnership is asking for your continued financial and organizational
support in accomplishing together new programs for our business communit}' both now
and in the future.
We have met our matching fund goal of$25,000 from the community. Through August
we will have received $18.750. We are asking for additional $7,000 for the balance of
1993 so we can accomplish the balance of the objectives planned this year.
The budget we are proposing for 199=4 will include continued financial support from
citizens and businesses. We are asking for a matching budget allocation from the City of
S32.000. This budget will allow us to promote and market programs for Kent that will
increase our ability to positively impact our local economy now and into the future.
Thank you in advance for your financial, organizational. and enthusiastic support of the
Partnership and our work.
Sincerely,
rim
Don McDaniel
President Kent Downtown Partnership
P.D. Box 557 • Kent, WA 98035-0557 • (206)850-5523
KENT DOWNTOWN PARTNERSHIP
Proposed Budget
January 1 through December 31, 1993
Revenue
Pledges and Contributions
S 25, 000
City of Kent Funds through 9/3p 18L750
S 43,750
Total Revenue
Expenditures
S Director Contract 24 , 960080
Secretarial Service 2,080
Fees and Dues 508
Liability Insurance 1 ,620
Office Space 90
Telephone 1 ,200
Office Supplies 124
P.O. Box and Permit 1 ,200
Postage and Copies 2,800
Newsletter 4,800
Committee Expense 3,600
Special Events 500
Consultant Fees 7 200
Business Recruitment t---
S 501812
Total Expenditures
S 7,062
Expected Shortfall 1993
Kent. Downtown Partnership
1993 Fundraising Campaign
January 1 through July 16, 1993
Paid Pledge
Ben Franklin Store (Gary Heather) S 90.00 S 90.00
Children' s Bookshop (Bob Beavers) 500.00 500 .00
City Beverages (Ford Kiene) 400.00 400.00
Computer Place (Don Baer) 330.00 360.00
Curran, Patricia 100.00 100.00
Dragness Office Supply (Toby Sells) 180 . 00 180.00
Edward D. Jones (Ron Cole) 120.00 120.00
Executive Custom Upholstery (M . Hoile) 90.00 90 .00
Gifts & Plunder (Jim & Marilyn Behlen) 20.00 240.00
Fanny/Jeans (Jean Padgett) 270. 00 360 .00
First Impressions (Linda Baer) 90.00 300 .00
The Glass Factory (Pat Roberts) 120 .00 120. 00
The Golden Blend (Pat Williams) 135.00 540.00
Hazen Gallery (Walter Hazen) 25.00 25.00
J. C . Penney Co . (Bob Crisp) 150.00 400 .00
Kent Jewelry & Loan (Beverly Buell ) 180 . 00 360.00
Kent Floral (Vince Manka) 540.00 540.00
Mom' s Country Kitchen (Clyde Warehime) 90.00 360.00
Purchasers Inc. (Ted Strain) 300.00 300.00
The Red Tabby (Barbara Pearson) 90.00 90.00
Sally Johnson (Travel Agent) 45.00 180 .00
Stagg's Collectibles (Andy Stagg) 300.00 360. 00
Stewart, W.H. (Owner-Bldg Computer Place) 300.00 600.00
Mr . Sudsy Car Wash (Richard Thomson) 30.00 30. 00
Turner & Associates (Chas. A . Turner) 250.00 250.00
Western Optical (Ron Nesland) 90.00 270 .00
Western Sign/Timlick Studios (Jim & Anne) 90.00 180 .00
West One Bank 500.00 500.00
Woods, Judy 50.00 50. 00
Yahn & Son (Terry Yahn) 342 . 00 360.00
-------- --------
$ 5817. 00 S 8255.00
-------- --------
-------- --------
sc'funds93
i
I�
KENT DOWNTOWN PARTNERSHIP
III',
1994 BUDGET PROPOSAL
ill
Ili
III
1 ■
ICI
I
i
KENT DOWNTOWN PARTNERSHIP
1994 BUDGET PROPOSAL
Downtown Season/ Events
Administration/Planning 8.000
Marketing Promotion 6.000
Event Activities 3.500
SUB TOTAL 17,500
Business Rec�uitmenURetention
Recuitment/Retention Programs 7.000
Small Business Assistance Programs 3.500
Communications 4.500
Meetings& News Letters
SUB TOTAL 15,000
Capita/Development
Design and Infrastructure 3.500
Planning and Dev. Capital Projects 3.000
SUB TOTAL 6,500
Committee Expenses
Recruitment and Retention 4.200
Marketing/Promotion 6.300
Executive/Board 1.500
SUB TOTAL 12.000
M/SC EXPENSES
Utilities 2.100
Office Space 4.800
Liability Insurance 508
Fees and Dues 300
Office Supplies 2,000
Postage Permits 124
Postage Expense 1.320
Consultant 500
Community Meetings 1.200
SUB TOTAL 12.852
BUDGET PROPOSAL 1994 63,852
DOWNTOWNSEASONAL EVENTS
KENT D011"NTOWN PARTNERSHIP SPONSORED:
* W NTERFEST
* ANNUAL SIDEWALK SALE
• G.-IRDEN SHOD['
EVENTS WE PARTICIPATE ON:
• SATLRDAY MARKET
* BALLOON CLASSIC
* CHILI COOK OFF
* CANTERBURY
• CORtiZJCOPIA
BUSINESS RECRUITMENT AND RETENTION
* DEVELOP MARKETING AND PROMOTION TOOLS
A. RETAIL.
I. URBAN PLANNING AND VISION ACTIVITY WITH CITY
2. MAIN STREET CONCEPTS
B. COMMERCIAL
C. INDUSTRIAL
D. PROFESSIONAL,
* PRESENTATION 7IATERIALS AND CObIMUNIC:ATION
ACTIVITY
A. CITY UPDATES
B. COMMUNITY PLANNING ANTD UPDATE N/IEETINGS
* CONSULTING SER'ICES FOR RECRIIITNIENT AND
RETENTION
A. DESIGN FOR NENV, OR EXPANSION ACTIVITIES
B. BUSINESS PLANING FOR NEW, EXPANSION, EXISTING.
I. RESOURCE CENTER CONCEPTS
2. SM. LL BUSINESS PLANNING AND OPERATION ASSISTANCE
x REGIONAL STRATEGIC PLANNING ACTIVITIES
A. TRANSPORTATION
C. Gi\IA
D. SIGHTNG OF NEW BUSINESSES
1, 1
DESIGN ASSISTANCE
RESOURCE PLANNING AND ASSISTANCE
A. LOAN POOLS
B. CON1 ,tMUNTITY REJI,�VESTMENT ACT
C. E.D.C.
D. STATE ECONONMIC DEVELOP�MENTT ORA.\, TTS
KENT DOWNTOWN
PARTNERSHIP
PRELIMINARY
BUSINESS
RECRUITMENT
PACKAGE
Jerry Prouty
Committee Chairperson
(206) 852-4682
Linda Johnson
Kent Downtown Director
(206) 850-5523
July 20, 1993
As president of the Kent Downtown Partnership, it is my
pleasure to work with a diverse and exciting group of business
leaders, leaders who strive to make Kent a marketable, liveable
and powerful business environment.
Kent is a city located near the business activity of King and
Pierce Counties, easily accessible to freeways, pedestrian
friendly, and likeable shops.
Kent is well known for its beautiful parks, the Green River
which skirts the downtown core area, its public and private golf
courses, and a renowned school district.
The Kent Downtown Partnership encourages new business to
locate in Kent, realizing business begets business.
Kent Downtown Partnership
Don McDaniel
President
Of all of the challenging and diverse
responsibilities associated with my job as
Mayor, I think the task which I find most
exciting and rewarding is the task of
neighborhood renewal and redevelopment.
One of the first private sector jobs I ever
had was the overseeing of the structural
rehabilitation of several historic buildings
in downtown Kent. That work got me
interested in local committees and groups
dedicated to the refurbishing and
improvement of Kent's central downtown
core neighborhood. I heard many Kent
residents express their frustration and
sadness that Kent's downtown core had
slowly declined over the last few decades. I,
too, was saddened by the decline of this
neighborhood which had, in my childhood,
been a thriving hub of all sorts of activity—
not only economic activity,but cultural and
social activity as well.
This hub of activity was important for
business of course,but it also helped me to
shape my view of my community's identity.
I knew I lived in a real`place",a connected
community, a town; not just a subdivision
near a highway-strip commercial-sprawl
which happened to be incorporated as a
municipality. Therefore it was with
enthusiasm that I listed "Downtown
Redevelopment"as a major priority when I
started my campaign for election as MayorD„
in 1985.I was fortunate to be elected,and I
am pleased to report that our community
has made impressive improvements to downtown Kent over the last 7 years.
My program for downtown redevelopment and improvement has been simple and straightforward.
First, lay the foundation of zoning and infrastructure which will allow the type of development and
redevelopment which will truly upgrade Kent's downtown.
Second, create an inviting environment in which people will want to invest development/redevelopment
dollars downtown by implementing beautification projects and activity programs; and by working with
area financial institutions to assure that a financial"environment"is also inviting to potential investors.
Finally,work to promote specific public and private development/redevelopment investments downtown.
Over the last few years,this simple program has resultedin over$200 million in private and public funding
commitments which are now resulting in a wholesale rebuilding of Kent's downtown.
I am excited about the things we have accomplished to upgrade and improve the business, cultural and
social center of my home town.
reds,
Dan K eher, Mayor
KENT DOWNTOWN
PARTNERSHIP
The Kent Downtown Partnership (KDP) is committed to enhancing and
maintaining Kent's downtown as a vibrant, economically strong and
people-oriented area. KDP is serving as a catalyst to strengthen the
Downtown's position as a business, governmental, cultural, retail and
transportation center.
To achieve this goal the KDP will continue to:
rr Promote cooperation among downtown businesses
cW Recruit new business to the downtown and work to
retain existing business
gr Encourage new development within the downtown area
cr Develop and implement programs to build a more
positive image of downtown
W Create a pedestrian friendly environment in the
downtown core
W Maintain funding options to facilitate the KDP's mission
Formed in 1992, The Kent Downtown Partnership, in' cooperation with
the city government, Chamber of Commerce and other organizations is
committed to achieving success through active participation of local
business and property owners.
HISTORY
The first settlers were brought to the Green River Valley by the Land
Development Act of 1850. Originally called Titusville after its founder,
James H. Titus, the vigorous hop-growing center took the name Kent
in 1884 from a famous hop growing area in England. In 1890 the
town, which covered less than one square mile, incorporated with 764
inhabitants.
Boeing brought the space age to Kent with the completion of the Kent
Space Center in 1965. Occupying 432 acres, the Center established its
reputation for aerospace research while building the Lunar Rover, the
nation's first moon vehicle, and training some of America's astronauts.
The key to Kent's economic growth in the last 100 years is the City's
location with respect to prime markets. By the 1970's the deep water
ports of Seattle and Tacoma were modernized to handle containerized
cargo and the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, four miles from
Kent, expanded to meet the traffic demands of a premier Pacific Rim
port.
City of Kent
POPULATION TRENDS
POPULATION GROWTH
1970 Census 19,755
1980 Census * 23, 152
1990 Census * 39,000
2000 Projection * 49,302
AGE OF RESIDENTS
Age Group 1970 1980 1990 2000
0-14 5,263 4,845 3,272 3,382
15-19 1,786 2,138 7,789 8,052
20-24 1,771 2,993 3,441 3,557
25-44 6,489 7,286 14,981 15,487
45-64 3,395 4,077 5,981 6, 180
65+ 1,051 1,534 2,466 2,549
19,755 * 22,873 * 37,920 39,200
Median Age 24.7 28.0 29.3
* Population growth and age of residents figures do not coincide - no explanation given
LABOR FORCE
Civilian 22,801
Employed 21 ,814
Unemployed 987
Unemployment 4.3%
Females in Labor Force
Total (over 16 yrs.) 10,151
Employed 9,613
Unemployed 538
Unemployment 5.3%
Females as a % of Total Labor 44.5%
EMPLOYMENT BY CATEGORY %
12.3
Executive, Administrative, Managerial 13.
Professional .6%%
Technicians 11.4%
Sales 18.3%
Administrative Support/Clerical
Service 10.4%
Farming, Forestry, Fishing 1. 1%
Production/Repair 12.6%
Machine Operators/Assembly 6.2%
Transportation 3.8%
General Labor 5.8%
INCOME LEVELS
Median Household Income $32,341
Median Family Income $37,801
RESIDENT PROFILE
DOWNTOWN KENT RESIDENT PROFILE
1W Highest proportion of multi-family housing (38%)
� Highest proportion of residents age 55 or older (27%)
IT Highest proportion of retired residents (22%)
cW Income: Under $25,000 (35%)
Over $50,000 (12%)
W Newspaper readership: Seattle Times (52%)
Kent Valley Daily News (50%)
EAST HILL RESIDENT PROFILE
(Includes unincorporated King County)
Ir Higher proportion of multi-family housing (35%)
xx Majority of residents age 35 to 54 years (42%)
cV Highest proportion of residents not employed outside
the home (19%)
9W Income: Under $25,000 (30%)
Over $50,000 (16%)
� Newspaper readership: 'Seattle Times (52%)
Kent Valley Daily News (50%)
WEST HILL RESIDENT PROFILE
(Includes unincorporated King County)
ir Mostly single-family housing (83%)
cr Majority of residents under age 35 (42%)
ffr Highest proportion of dual income households (51%)
W Income: Under $25,000 (19%)
Over $50,000 (24%)
cW Newspaper readership: Seattle Times (54%)
Kent Valley Daily News (21%)
DOWNTOWN MARKET
OPPORTUNITIES
BUILT IN CUSTOMER BASE
Approximate number of downtown employees, 1993*
City/County 537
Medical 369
Financial 142
Utilities ill
Manufacturing and Distribution 614
Retail 401
Restaurants 297
Service 366
Professional 199
Volunteers / Non-Profit 449
Totals 3,485
• Phone survey May 1993, 233 business ,all within the Downtown Planning District.
Total employees city wide: 43,800 Full Time
2,700 Part Time
Total population within Kent School District 109,079
1990 Population Count
1993 Estimated School District Population (K-12) 122,000
Note: Future Regional Justice Center, 1996, estimated employment of
738 employees
QUALITY OF LIFE
"The Top 50 Fabulous Places to Raise Your Family," Lee Rosenberg and
Sara Lee H. Rosenberg, 1993, Career Press, Hawthorne, N.J. Kent is
mentioned as one of the nation's best places to live and raise a family.
t RECREATION
Kent's location between Seattle and Tacoma in the heart of the
Puget Sound basin offers a range of recreational opportunities.
Regionally, water and boating activities in both Puget Sound and
area freshwater lakes are a tremendous draw. The snow skier
has six resort areas to choose from within 50 to 100 miles, and a
season that runs from November into April, most years.
The excitement of professional sports and a world-renowned
cultural scene can be found in nearby Seattle. The Seattle
Kingdome is the home of the Seahawks and Mariners, and the
Supersonics play at the Seattle Center Coliseum. The cultural life
of the city brings internationally acclaimed opera, symphony and
ballet to life with a choice of many fine professional and semi-
professional companies.
♦ PARKS
The Kent area has over 1,000 acres of Iush, green parks and
open space, owned and maintained by the City of Kent (665
acres) and King County (386 acres).
The City of Kent Parks and Recreation Department received the
1988 National Gold Medal for Parks and Recreation Management
due to its impressive inventory of park facilities and varied
offering of recreational programs for all ages and abilities.
Gems of the area include a pedestrian trail along the Green River
Recreational Corridor, Mill Creek Canyon, and its inviting entry,
the Earthworks Park.
Russell Road Athletic Complex, with five lighted softball fields,
hosts over 2,250 adult softball players through local teams as well
as tournaments every weekend, spring through fall.
Riverbend Golf Complex offers an 18-hole championship course,
driving range, full pro shop and miniature golf course, and a par-3,
nine-hole course.
Kent's extensive park inventory includes over 26 miles of paved
trails for jogging and cycling.
Kent Senior Activity Center offers recreational, health and social
programs to all citizens, ages 55 and older, living in the Kent
area.
Kent Commons, a total indoor athletic and community complex,
is open to the public year round.
The Special Populations Resource Center provides a full range of
services and classes for disabled citizens.
t KENT SPECIAL EVENTS
+ Kent Saturday Market
+ Summer Concert Series
+ International Hot Air Balloon Classic
• Kent Cornucopia Days and Sidewalk Sale
• Kent Canterbury Faire
• Kent Canterbury Winterfest
+ L113R ARY
The Kent Library, located downtown at 2nd Ave. and Smith St., is
the first regional library constructed outside Seattle. The King
County Library System and the City of Kent jointly own this
22,500 square foot facility which houses a large business and
reference collection as well as an extensive collection for
children. Approximately 225,000 items: books, magazines, audio
and video cassettes, compact discs, etc., are available seven days
a week.
♦ EDUCATION K/12
The Kent School District is recognized as one of the outstanding
districts in Washington State. The U.S. Department of Education
regularly honors Kent schools in their School Recognition
Program. Test scores show our fourth, eighth and tenth grade
students are above the national median: over 50% of Kent
graduates go on to post-secondary training.
The student population of the Kent School District was 22,237 in
1992-93, making it the fifth largest school district in the state.
The current five to six percent student growth rate means that
1,000 students are projected to be added to the district each year.
Maintaining excellence in education in such a rapid growth
period requires an effective school system founded on staff'
caring, coupled with an involved and committed community. Our
district philosophy and goals center on excellence. The objective
is for each of our students to have every opportunity to develop to
his or her potential.
♦ HIGHER EDUCATION
Kent provides many opportunities for higher learning and we
have people who will meet your employment needs.
Green River Community College is located on a 160-acre wooded
campus to the southeast of Kent. Just under 8,200 students are
enrolled in programs ranging from vocational and technical areas
to preparatory work leading to transfer to major university.
Green River also offers customized training and short-term
business courses through its Education & Training Center (ETC),
located in downtown Kent.
Highline Community College, with student enrollment topping
10,700, is located in the Midway area on the west side of Kent,
and occupies an 80-acre campus overlooking Puget Sound.
Nearby Renton Technical College offers 42 full-time job training
programs, as well as 17 variations. Completion time varies from
6 months to 2 years, depending on the nature of the course.
Also within commuting distance are the University of
Washington, Seattle University and Seattle Pacific University in
Seattle; and Pacific Lutheran University and the University of
Puget Sound in Tacoma.
t CITY ART PROGRAM
The City Art Program allocates $2 per capita per annum from the
City's general fund for public art. Projects are included in a five-
year plan updated annually. Art of all media is purchased through
open and invitational competitions and direct selection. As a
result of this program, Kent has acquired a collection of
downtown murals which constitute a delightful outdoor art
gallery.
Overseeing this and other art-related programs is the City of
Kent Arts Commission, assisted by the Cultural Arts staff of the
Parks and Recreation Department. The Kent Arts Commission is
acknowledged statewide for outstanding contributions to the arts
and is a leader among arts-providing agencies.
The murals are listed in order on an easy walking route downtown.
• "Kent Kids' Tile Tapestry by Karen Stocker, Martin Sortun
Elementary Students and Friends, located inside the Kent
Commons, 525 - 4th Ave. N.
+ 'The City of Peace and Kindness" by Yegor Tolkunov, Kent
Kherson Peace Park, 2nd Ave. at Gowe St.
• 'Transitions" by Danny Pierce, 303 W. Meeker, outside of
Children's Bookshop close to the corner of 2nd Ave. and
Meeker St.
• "Fire at Fred's Place" by Danny Pierce, 204 W. Meeker, outside
of First Interstate Bank Close to the corner of 1st Ave. and
Meeker St.
• 'We Are All Related" by Roger Broer, First Interstate Bank
close to the comer of 1st Ave. and Meeker St., facing 1st Ave.
+ Carnation Mural, The Creamery, 1st Ave. and Meeker St.,
facing 1st Ave.
Kaibara Park,t Bridge
tA e. betweben Mebeker and Smith St.
• Nakayama,
Supporting Group" by Brom Wikstrom, Kent Parks Resource
Center, 315 E. Meeker.
• 'The Lilly" by Danny Pierce, Titusville Station, corner of 1st
Ave. and Gowe St.
DOWNTOWN COMMUNITY
EVENTS
KENT SATURDAY MARKET- An outdoor public market in
downtown gent - 1st week of May through 2nd week in October
er Promotes downtown Kent as a tourism and destination shopping
center.
e91 Allows local farmers, gardeners, merchants, artisans and
craftspersons to sell their products directly to the consumer.
ar Provides a congenial atmosphere appeals to citizens of all ages and
ethnic backgrounds.
cal Downtown focal point and cultural hub of activity.
RX Forges relationship with schools, local businesses, community
organizations, government agencies for assistance, talent
performance and contributions.
ar Benefits merchants and small businesses in central business
district.
Ew Is admired by citizenry and visitors from the Greater Seattle area
and abroad.
ow Expands with major market events each Saturday.
Sponsored by City of Kent and Kent Parks and Recreation Department
KENT INTERNATIONAL BALLOON CLASSIC - An annual hot air
balloon festival. - 3rd Weekend in July
Er Two morning balloon launches
sw Media celebrity race
W "Kent Balloon Glow"
1W 35,000 on-site spectators
Er Major media coverage, television, radio, newspapers and
magazines.
Sponsored by City of Kent and Kent Parks and Recreation Department
CORNUCOPIA DAYS - A family oriented summer festival
Late July
W Stage Entertainment
9T Grand Parade
Er Children's Parade
W Good Food
W Giant Street Fair
r� Carnival
W Children's Stage
Sponsored by Kent Lions Club
ANNUAL SIDE WALK SALE
Sponsored by local merchants in conjunction with Cornucopia
KENT SUMMER CONCERT SERIES
July and August _
9T Annual Summer Concert Series with fifteen free outdoor
performances drawing audiences of more than 18,000
1W Top northwest headliners provide first quality family
entertainment in a beautiful open-air setting
Co-sponsored by Kent Arts Commission, City of Kent and Kent Parks and
Recreation Department
CANTERBURY FAIRE
3rd Weekend in August
KV Juried fine crafts marketplace
R9* Children's activities
gr Juried fine art exhibits
cT High tea
Val Dance and music workshops
1W Free shuttle bus service
Kr Antique and gallery walk
KX Northwest Renaissance poets
IT Horse-drawn carriage, poets and storytellers, knights in shining
armor, dancers, and artisans.
Sponsored by City of Kent and Kent Parks and Recreation Department.
CANTERBURY WINTERFEST
1st Saturday of December
Ir Holiday Preview
cr Santa Claus Parade
Marching Units
s Floats
Music
Refreshments
Santa Claus
cr Lighting of Kent's large Christmas tree
W Kaibara Park (Japan Sister City's Park) holiday decorations.
Sponsored by Kent Downtown Partnership and City of Kent.
Community Reinvestment
Recent investment strategies include office space, beautification and
public investment, both local and regional.
ECONOMIC ACTIVITY IN DOWNTOWN SINCE 1989
Private Investment $ 11,900,000
Public Investment 15,700,000
Proposed Private/Public Investment 184,500,000
Total Number of projects
ECONOMIC ACTIVITY IN DOWNTOWN SINCE MAY 1992
Net new business 85
Net new jobs 217
City wide total new business 470
MAJOR PROJECTS SUMMARY SINCE 1989
Centennial Center - 71,600 sf office building, 90% occupied
Kent Regional Library - 22,500 sf; $7 million public investment
Harrison House - Senior housing project (94 units); $7 million
public investment
Police Headquarters - located next door to City Hall, creating a City
Services Campus
PLANNED DOWNTOWN PROJECTS
Performing Arts and Cultural Center
The Mayor of Kent has appointed a Performing Arts Center
Task Force to explore the possibility of developing a Cultural
Arts Center in downtown Kent. A feasibility study has been
completed, and the group is contracting for architectural
drawings and a three-dimensional model as well as a business plan
to accomplish Phase II of the project.
Such a facility, which includes a 500 to 600-seat theater,
would provide space to present high quality visual and
performing arts programs to the community, as well as provide
needed instructional rooms for cultural arts and music classes.
Benefits to City of Kent:
Creates another catalyst for downtown revitalization
® Creates increased patronage for downtown businesses
• Acts as a magnet for overall downtown use and development
® Provides opportunities for new downtown service and
support businesses
• Serves as a showcase for Kent's cultural vitality and civic pride.
Benefits to Kent families and youth:
IQ4h Creates positive alternatives and activities to help youth
at risk
® Continues the tradition of Kent's outstanding facilities
and services
Increases cultural and creative opportunities for Kent's
citizens
Creates a community meeting place
• Supports local arts groups
• Enhances quality of life for the whole community
Regional Justice Center(RJQ
A site is already selected and budgeted for $152,000,000 regional
justice facility to consist of 700,000 square feet including Superior
Courts, a District Court, judicial administration, prosecutor offices,
public safety offices, and a capacity for approximately 960
detention beds. 274,000 square feet is planned for the Court
System and support services. 738 employees and over 1,000 daily
visitors are anticipated for the center once fully it is operational in
late 1996.
Commuter Rail Station
Multi-Modal transportation facility to include rail station, multi-use
parking for rail and transit users. Ancillary private investment is
anticipated near these facilities to service users. Location not
fixed yet, but will be decided sometime in 1994 for the downtown
area.
Municipal Court
Downtown building has been selected and renovation is underway.
Municipal judges and administrative staff to be added to the new
city court system.
NEW INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT
Infrastructure Facilities Program
A City Facilities Plan for making over $4,000,000 in improvements
to Downtown sewer, water, street, storm systems and sidewalks
has been approved and is now being implemented.
In-City Transit Program
City has allocated $75,000 to conduct a Transit Study to determine
the feasibility of a formal transit system for the City of Kent. Study
to be completed in mid-1994. A citizen advisory committee on
transit has been formed to review this issue.
ECONOMIC TRENDS
The Kent Valley has the state's highest concentration of industrial
space at 58 million square feet. While the local expanding economy is
becoming increasingly diverse; the growth of overseas air trade routes
is creating a global marketplace for Puget Sound and particularly the
Kent Valley. The largest capital project ever undertaken by King
County, the new Justice Center, with its $35 million payroll, will be
located in downtown Kent.
ECONOMIC INDICATORS
In spite of increasing state and national unemployment rates, Western
Washington unemployment remained unchanged in 1992, at 5.5%.
This figure is 2% lower than both state and national levels. The Puget
Sound Regional Council reported that Kent had experienced an
estimated 74.8% increase in per capita money income between 1979
and 1989. In this time period, Kent's per capita income jumped from
$9,150 in 1979 to $15,993 in 1989. King County experienced an
increase of 94% during this same'time period.
MAJOR KENT EMPLOYERS
Number of Number of
Company Employees Company Employees
The Boeing Company 10,000 Kent Medical Center, Inc. 220
Kent School District 2,064 Boise Cascade Office Products 209
Valley Medical Center 1,000 U.S. Postal Service 204
Heath Tecna Aerospace Co. 950 Budget Panels, Inc. 190
Regional Justice Center 738 Flow International 190
Food Services of America 670 Fred Meyer Co. - East Hill 175
Continental Mills, Inc. 525 American National Can Corp. 171
Mannesmann Tally Corp. 500 NW Aluminum Products, Inc. 170
City of Kent 450 Valley Daily News 168
Sysco Continental 405 Exotic Metals Co. 165
The Robbins Co. 300 NW Metal Products Co. 150
Costco Wholesale 260 Davis Walker Co. 150
Recreational Equipment, Inc. 251 AT&T 150
Starbucks 240
CITY OF KENT CAPACITY ESTIMATES
Number of Vacant Floor-Area Number of
& Underdeveloped Capacity **
Growth Area Parcels* (sq. ft.) Employees
Single-Family homes 2,689 •••••• _.....
Multi-Family homes 4,955 •••••
Mobile homes 302 •••••
Commercial business 9,414,225 37,656
Industrial business ...... 18,636,107 12,424
Total 7,946 28,050,332 50,080
*Based on existing zoning.
* * Assumes one employee per 250 sq. ft. of floor area for commercial
development and one employee per 1,500 sq. ft. industrial development.
Source: City of Kent Planning Dept., June 1992
CITY OF KENT FORECASTS*
1990 2000 2010 2020
Population 39,200 49,302 55,648 61,906
Employment 46,521 49,989 53,051
* Estimates based on existing conditions.
Source: Puget Sound Regional Council Projections, 1992
BUSINESS INCENTIVE AND
ASSISTANCE
BUSINESS FINANCING
Kent commercial banks are dedicated to community reinvestment
through their individual, specific business loan programs, plus
government guarantee programs. Federal SBA, commercial, RE
#504 and other loan guarantees targeted at job creation and
retention are processed by local banks.
EMPLOYEE TRAINING INCENTIVES
The Washington State Employment Security Department provides
grants through specific skill training for the selection and training
of new or existing employees. These are administered by a local
community college and vocational school.
DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE
The Kent Chamber of Commerce participates with the SBA in
providing SCORE officers for small business consultation at a local
site in Kent. Additionally, a Small Business Assistance Committee
works with the greater Kent business community to foster small
business growth.
t t Y
■ \ ■ \ \\\�
ti
INNIS,
�o
SEATTLE
■
VIW
EN
y_ �b
rvi1�.0ii0N<�y�
ar
65
IG« �
TALICMA`
RECRUITMENT DEVELOPMENT
RETENTION COMMITTEE
Dragness Office Supply City of Kent
Toby Sells Roger Lubovich
100 Railroad Ave. 220 4th Ave. S.
Kent, Washington 98032 Kent, Washington 98032
(206) 852-4444 (206) 859-3340
City of Kent E.D. Jones and Co.
Raul Ramous Ron Cole
25222 38th Ave. S. 205 E. Meeker
Kent, Washington 98032 Kent, Washington 98032
(206)946-3760 (206) 850-1498
Farrington Court Far West Properties Inc.
Retirement Center Jim Bell
Bill Fenner 1211 E. Seattle St.
516 Kenoria Kent, Washington 98031
Kent, Washington 98032 (206) 859-0400
(206) 852-2737
First Interstate Bank Kent Chamber
Bill Knowie Barbara Simpson
204 W. Meeker P.O. Box 128
Kent, Washington 98032 Kent, Washington 98035
(206) 854-3991 (206) 854-1770
Kent Downtown Partenership Montoure Real Estate
Linda Johnson Howard Montoure
400 W. Gowe, #310 21620 84 Ave. S.
Kent, Washington 98032 Kent, Washington 98031
(206) 850-5523 (206) 872-8728 .
Property Owner Property Owner
Dee Moschel Pat Curran
425 Scenic Way 300 Scenic Way
Kent, Washington 98031 Kent, Washington 98031
(206) 852-7081 (206) 852-6732
Puget Power Puget Power
Don McDaniel Lisa Brewer
400 W. Gowe 400 W. Gowe, #310
Kent, Washington 98032 Kent, Washington 98032
(206) 854-2330 (206) 850-5527
Sound Ventures Turner and Assoc.
Stephanie Klappenbach Chuck Turner
400 W. Gowe #208 604 W. Meeker
Kent, Washington 98032 Kent, Washington 98032
(206) 223-9500 (206) 854-8700
W.E. Ruth Real Estate West One Bank
Jerry Prouty Rosanne Bilski
19222 108 Ave. SE 504 W. Meeker
Renton, Washington 98055 Kent, Washington 98032
(206) 852-4682 (206) 852-7400
Western Sign
Jim Timlick
215 E.Titus
Kent, Washington 98032
(206) 852-7010
KENT DOWNTOWN PARTNERSHIP
CONTRIBUTORS
Apple Barrel Moschel, Dee
Bell Anderson Insurance Mr. Sudsy Car Wash
Ben Franklin Store Northwest Drywall
Bittersweet Restaurant Northwest Fleet Lease
Blessings Jewelry Northwest Metal Products
Boeing Company Now 'N Then
Bratton, William, CPA PIP Printing
Centennial Center Pacific First Bank
Children's Bookshop Penney, J C
City Beverages Prouty, Jerry
Computer Place Puget Power
Curran, Kleweno & Johnson Puget Sound Bank
Curran, Patricia Purchasers (Ted Strain)
Dragness Estate, George Red Tabby
Dragness Office Supply Ruth (W E) Realty
Entry Systems St. Anthony Church
Exec. Custom Upholstery SeaFirst Bank
Family Drive Inn SeaTac Sweeping
Fanny Jeans Second Avenue North Assoc.
Farrington Court Shannon & Associates
First Impressions Silver Spectrum Gallery
First Interstate Bank Sir Speedy
Gifts & Plunder Stagg's Collectibles
Glass Factory Stewart's Jewelers
Golden Blend Stewart, William (Jewelers)
Gowe Street Associates Stewart, William (R�Q
Hazen Gallery T J's Sportcards
Heath Tecna Thorell, Patrice
Hieneman, Edward & Mary Turner & Associates
J B Factory Carpets Valley Medical Center
Jarvis, Paul, CPA Western Sign
Johnson, Sally White, Jim
Jones, Edward D., Co. Van's Furniture
Jones, Michael, CPA Vaughn, Harold & Loretta
Jubes Art & Frame West One Bank
Kent Bowl Western Optical
Kent Floral Western Sign Co /Timlick Studios
Kent Jewelry Woods, Judy
Kent Medical Center Yahn & Son
MacNab Manufacturing
Magic Style Beauty Shop
McElheran Partnership
Meridian Instrument Co.
Mom's Country Kitchen
Kent City Council Meeting
Date August 3 1993
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: SCHOOL SECURITY PROGRAM/OFFICER - BUDGET CHANGE
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Approval of funding of an additional
police officer beyond 4et� current allotment of 82 . This allows
for an officer in the schools . The cost to the City will be -Fei-1,
equipment and the use of a car. The School District will pay
basic wages and benefits .
3 . EXHIBITS: Memo from Chief Crawford dated 7/23/93
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Safety Committee (2-0 Mann on vacation)
and Budget Committee (3-0)
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT• NO YES X
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 3J
KENT POLICE DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO: BUDGET COMMITTEE
FROM: Chief Ed Crawford
DATE: July 23 , 1993
RE: Request for Additional Police Officer Position
The Kent School District is changing its security arrangements, and
discontinuing the traditional security officer positions. They
will , however, still have school monitors . They are attempting to
design a security program evolved around a commissioned police
officer being responsible for the schools when school is in
session. This allows for a police officer to be in the schools,
getting to know the kids and young adults, and working in concert
with them to alleviate problems . This program has worked extremely
well in areas outside of Kent, such as Pierce County.
We are asking that the City fund an additional police officer,
beyond our current allotment of 82 , to perform this function. By
doing this, we will be able to have an officer in the schools, and
then back-fill to replace his lost beat position. The cost to the
City will be equipment and the use of a car. The School District
will pay basic wage and benefits .
EC: klr
Kent City Council Meeting
Date August 3 , 1993
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: POLICE/FIRE SURVEILLANCE EQUIPMENT PURCHASE
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Approval of a joint proposal between
Police and Fire to upgrade the video surveillance equipment
used in the investigation of crimes.
3 . EXHIBITS: Equipment list and price quotes from Proline and
B. E. Meyers
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Police and Fire Departments Public Safety
Committee 2-0 Budget Committee 3-0 (Orr, Johnson, White) ,
Executive Committee
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES _
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended_ � nJN Not Recommended
6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $6 566 including tax for the Fire Dept.
$9 440 including tax for the Police Dept.
SOURCE OF FUNDS: from the interest accrued from the Public
Safety Bond Issue
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION: _
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 3K
SURVEILLANCE EQUIPMENT PROPOSAL
FIRE
TOTAL TOTAL
PROLINE MEYERS PROLINE MEYERS
3 - CCTV CAMERAS SONY SSCM254 (WITH AUTO IRIS) 250.00 317.00 750.00 951.00
1 - LENS COMPUTAR MCA 7518APC (AUTO IRIS) 214.00 244.00 214.00 244.00
2 - LENS COMPUTAR HG1814AFC (AUTO IRIS) 140.00 158.00 280.00 316.00
2 - AC/DC TIME LAPSE VIDEO RECORDERS 1800.00 2195.00 3600.00 4390.00
1 - ROBOT MV 45 QUAD 625.00 813.00 625.00 813.00
1 - PELCO VIDEO MOTION DETECTOR MODEL MD2000 300.00 393.00 300.00 393.00
*ASST COAX, FITTINGS, CABLES, & EXTENSION CORDS 300.00 300.00 300.00 300.00
3629.00 4420.00 6069.00 7407.00
TAX 297.58 362.44 497.66 607.37
3926.58 4782.44 6566.66 8014.37
POLICE
2 - CCTV CAMERA SONY SSCM254 (WITH AUTO IRIS) 250.00 317.00 500.00 634.00
2 - LENS COMPUTAR HASO425APC 4MM PIN HOLE LENS 350.00 393.00 700.00 786.00
1 - CEILING MOUNT 25.00 15.00 25.00 15.00
3 - AC/DC TIME LAPSE RECORDERS I SO0.00 2195.00 5400.00 6585.00
1 - SANYO VDC9212 (BURGER CAMERA) INFRARED 350.00 369.00 350.00 369.00
1 - WATEC WAT 307 WAFER CAMERA (W/BUILT IN LENS) 325.00 466.00 325.00 466.00
I - SONY HAND-HELD MONITOR 200.00 265/278 200.00 265/278
1 - ROBOT MV45 625.00 813.00 625.00 813.00
1 - PELCO VIDEO MOTION DETECTOR MODEL MD2000 300.00 393.00 300.00 393.00
*ASST COAX, FITTINGS, CABLES, & EXTENTIONS CORDS 300.00 300.00 300.00 300.00
4525.00 5526.00 8725.00 10626.00
TAX 371.05 453.13 715.45 871.33
4896.05 5979.13 9440.45 11497.33
:OCURED LOCALLY
7l93
SACRAMENTD,CA 95227
AFLL�WJE. YA 96005 (9 16)363-2029
P R®L I N 1999
1633 BAYSHORE HWY.,STE,262 6680 S.W CAPITOL H%VY,
FOFITLAND,OR 97219
CA 94010
11730 N I - I 2th, PE t EV "A C PURLINGAME. (501)2454685
(-106- 4✓ 5�-1999 F "X c 1415)692 5262
DATE lease indicall
z -) 77
this number 6 3
TEO when ordering TERNS
—
TO y Un It Pulfly 0'
y (jrT it ? y Fos
p—ROPOIEDSHIPPNG DATE TO BE SHIPPED VIA
_IZ-0—13 --=
L
-
HERE IS OUR QUOTATION ON THE GOODS NAMED, SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS NOTi D:
" Y
po
2-q
2,Lt
z-5-
()U(:)Tr- VALID FOR Sy
11730 N.E.12TH ;`._ JJ5S CRAM NTY F A 9 E. IU2
RMPROLINE
SACRAMENTO,02 96H21
BELLE'JUE.WA 99006(206)a61-1999 — (916)SfiY2029
'- _ C, 1633 BnY HWY., 262 C�6600 S.W.CAPITOLHWY.
11730 N.E. 121h, BELLEVIll WA 3 EUflINGAME,CA 4010 PORDN0,06 W219
(206) 451-1999 FAX ( C46 (415)692-5262 S 6
85
----- -' - WDATE Please indicate JThis number
when orderingY DATED TERMS
----- - - -- PROPOSED SHIPPING DATE TO BE SHIPPED VIA
F.O.E3. PPO. COLL.
iE IS OUR QUOTATION ON THE GOODS NAMED, SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS NOTED: ,
M
M
r
co
CUOTE VALID FOR DAYS GUOarPO❑S'Je6ar7EJ Bf
n=ITEO B(
FIT L(,EVUE.C6)4 1!1 6Ci5 ,G IEN tU :A �N71
� b, (266)ISt :999 (916)063 2029
pla:
73] N.I . I)lh E?ftl EV I'c ,V I" C T 1631 eAYSHORE HWY..STE.262 6660 S.W CAPITOL HHY.eURUNGA6IE.CA 94010 PORTLAND,Ca 97219
�,1"6� 4�)-19�9 Fr,X �, .0 Ij.:6 - (415) (SO71245-1665
—..__..-------- —�-� —-- - YATE Please indicate !1- This number J 7 when ordering
TQ ` S '—_ RY ,1TED TERMS
SHIPPING GATE 70 BE SHIPPED VIA
-f-E l ,
s, ss,+w PPo. ceLL.
HERE IS OUR QUOTATION ON THE GOODS NAMED, SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS NOTED:
,7
1 4 AI 1
7 ✓
r/ L5 5S0
C ~ �2 �t r1 �s if
c �
��
PJTJ/Cj
lZvv 2�L0N1 f�3a'
TV q�-� It( UK[
✓�+� J2
ZUJ C�cfb�y
QUOTE VALID FOR
avor;.nc++suel:.�reD Er.
._.'%•1 iCtl aCCEP fcO Er.
B.E.
� IVIS =«as
&CO. INC,
ELECTRO OPTICS
77525 NE 67th Cc. Redmond,WA 98052 (2061881.6648 FAX(206)867-1759 �-
800-DARK-NITE 1327-56481
July 12, 1993
R. K. Kaufmann
City of Kent Police Dept
220 4th Avenue S
Kent, WA 98032-5895
Dear Det. Kaufmann:
i am happy to quote you the following products:
PRICE PRICE
CITY ITEM EACH TOTAL
3 each AVS CCTV cameras Sony SSCM 254 $317.00 $951.00
(with auto-iris)
1 each Chugai lens computar MCA 7518apc $244.00 $244.00
auto-iris)
2 each Uhugai lens computar hd1814afcs $158,00 $316.00
(auto-iris)
2 each Gyyr ac/dc time lapse video recorders $2195,00 $4390.00
Gyyr TLC 180ODC
1 each AV S robot my 45 quad $813.00 $813.00
1 each AV S pelco video motion detector $393.00 $393.00
model md2000
assorted coax, fittings, cables and -- $40.00 $40.00
extension cords, video cable x 10?+/-
camera power adapters
2 each AV S CCTV camera Sony sscm254 $317.00 $634.00
with auto iris)
2 each hugai lens computar has 0425apc $393.00 $786.00
4mm pinhole lens
1 each ADI ceiling mount GVC WM-36 $15.00 $15.00
3 each GYYR ac/dc time lapse recorders $2195.00 $6585.00
GYYR TLC 180ODC
1 each AV S Sanyo vdc9212 (burger camera) $369.00 $369.00
infrared
1 each Pacnor Watec wat 307 wafer camera $466.00 $466.00
(w/built in lens)
1 each AV S Sony handheld monitor 4" B/VV S265.00 $265.00
FDM 402-A (6vdc ext. power)
DARK INVADER 2NO+ AND MCI GENERATION N[GHT VISION SYSTEMS
"OU/C'3RD CEN.POCXETSCOPE WITH DARK INVPAER ;ND GFN.t VIEU ERS
"INFRARED ZOOM LASER ILLUMINATOR Wli H 'INFRARED? :POT ILLUMINATOR"
POL-CAM(REMOTE CONTROLLED 3020 2^40 GErf.- VICL'ER WITH DART(M.ADED PDbP,NCE7 NIGHT VILIGN PHGTOG.RAPHY
cu•vp eci �n �[cvcTFUi iuc"v�nrn>- .�.. i e,m nlnuie. .-i. .. ,...,..,....��..- .-. --..--_-.. _._ _______.._.._._____..-..e �nnoco<
I each FDM 030(4'aAA'hblatts�es) + BNC � $278.00 $278.00
cable VK 30D $813.00 $813.00
1 each AN S "robot" mv45
1 each AV S pelco video motion detector $393.00 $393.00
model md2000
assorted coax, fittings, cables and $40.00 $40.00
extension cords, tripods, video cable X
10? +l-, camera power adapters
1 each AV S pelco video motion detector $393.00 $393.00
model md2000 813.00 $813.00
1 each AV 3 robot mv45 $ _
1 each auto iris to go with Hitachi VK-C150
2/3" format c-mount auto-iris 4mm-16mm $120.00-$200.00 $120.00-$200.
2 each goose neck camera mounts $195.00 $390,00
videoalarm DM20R
Drop ceiling mount:
VMI MT102-post $52.00 $52.00
Pelco EH1000-Housing $ 96.00 $ 98.00
Pelco EH2100-Housing $13.00 113.00
Videoalarm VL-VL0201-dome $113.00 $113.00
Sincerely,
Roger } refit g
Vice Presiaen
Marketing
RK/cje
Kent City Council Meeting
Date August 3 1993
Category Consent Calendar
1 . SUBJECT: CAPITAL AND MAINTENANCE FUNDING FOR GOLF COMPLEX
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Approval of the expenditure of up to
$65 , 685 on the Golf Complex improvements in 1993 , as
recommended by the Budget Committee. Funds from the SSMD
Enterprises, Inc. contractor buyout would be used to finance
the request.
3 . EXHIBITS: Project list
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: City of Kent Golf Advisory Board Parks
Committee and Budget Committee
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES X
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $65 , 685
SOURCE OF FUNDS: Funds from the SSMD contractor buyout
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION•
Council Agenda
Item No. 3L
THE CITY OF KEN'r GOLF ADVISORY HOARD
RIVERBEND GOLF COMPLEX IMPROVEMENTS
EXPENDITURE RECOMMENDATIONS
Maintenance Projects - in priority order
Asphalt Foot Bridge 974 Contractor
Mini Putt Facelift (4x4 borders, paint, 7,707 Contractor, In-house
carpet)
Thin trees around courses 7,200 Contractor
Sand for traps, 30 ton 767 In-house
Maintenance Building, paint outside 450 In-house
Stump removal, unit rental only 1,250 minimum charge
Vacuum Cleaner, commercial model 650
Sub Total 18,998
Complex Improvements
Par 3 Course
Paint Building 1,042 Contractor
Build ADA approved ramp 2,500
Driving Range
Paint Building 5,900 Contractor
Purchase Ball Washer 1(),000
18 Hole
Paint/Stain Building 7,124
Sub Total 26,566
Course Rest Rooms
Purchase 2 stand alone rest rooms, including 15,711
tax and delivery
Installation costs including setting tanks, 4,410 In-house
concrete slab and signage
Sub Total 20,121
To'rAL 65,685
3/vl
C 0 NS t N
A D E ^ i T- E PS (.�a-c)c�'�
Authorization to set August 17 , 1993, as the date for
a public hearing to receive input on the 1994 Budget.
Kent City Council Meeting
Date August 3 , 1993
Category Other Business
1 . SUBJECT: SEWERAGE BONDS FINANCING - BOND ORDINANCE AND
PURCHASE CONTRACT
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: The Operations Committee has recommended
adoption of a bond ordinance and authorization for the Mayor to
sign a purchase contract with Lehman Brothers for the Sewerage
Improvement and Refunding Bonds . The bond issuance will be for
approximately $8 , 635, 000 . Approximately $3 , 511, 000 will be
used to refinance the callable portion of the 1986 Drainage
Bonds. The issuance rate will be approximately 5 . 5 percent and
will save the City approximately $150 , 000 in net present value
debt service. In addition, $374 , 000 will refund the out-
standing principal on the City ' s portion of LID 330 .
Approximately $4 , 750, 000 of new revenue bonds will be issued to
finance drainage improvements authorized and identified in the
City' s 6-year Capital Improvement Plan for the drainage
utility.
- pr e tat�'� of,�h�an :$� ers be. p esent� fjnaV#e
th igur on tPr�"issuE" �nd asaer any ester.
3 . EXHIBITS: Bond ordinance and purchase contract
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Operations Committee 2-0 (Houser not present)
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: VO YES X
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended_ Not Recommended
6 . EXPENDITURE REOUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS :
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: rrAA
Councilmember VltJ-i'_1' moves, Councilmember seconds
to adopt Bond Ordinance No. and to authorize the Mayor to
sign a purchase contract with Lehman Brothers .
DISCUSSION: �1ti
ACTION:
L (A
Council Agenda
Item No. 4A
LEHMAN BROTHERS
RICHARD 13.Knit
5PNIO:R VICE PRESIDENT
MEMORANDUM
TO: May Miller
FROM: Richard B. King ,,
DATE: July 29, 1993
RE: CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON
Sewerage System Improvement and Refunding Revenue Bonds, 1993
We are working with Moody's and Standard & Poor's to obtain ratings on the City's Drainage
Utility Bonds, which we plan to price on Monday, August 2. In addition, we are exploring the
use of municipal bond insurance to obtain a comrnitment for bond insurance, which would
result in automatic Aaa/AAA ratings. We will use bond insurance only if it proves to be cost
effective, something we will detemdne tomorrow.
The 1993 Bonds have two general purposes; refinancing outstanding debt to take advantage of
lower interest rates and financino the next component of the Drainage Utility's overall capital
program. Within.the refinancing category are two components. The City will advance refund
the callable portion of the original 1986 Drainage Bonds, which includes the 1997 - 2006
maturities that total $3,120.000. In addition, the City will refund its portion of LID No. 330
Bonds, which currently are outstanding in the principal amount of approximately $374,000.
We estimate the net present value savings for the refinancing portion of the issue, approximately
$3.9 .million, will total about $150,000 with the majority of that amount accruing because of the
larger refinancing.
The remainder of the 1993 Bonds will be used to finance ongoing capital needs and paying
issuance costs. In addition, we are funding the Debt Service Reserve Fund out of proceeds of
the 1993 Bonds,rather than accumulating the necessary amount of revenues during the next five
years. We believe this will provide a stronger security package and, thus, enable us to provide
lower interest rates. The new money component currently is estimated at $4,750,000, which
may change slightly depending on actual interest rates next Monday,
UHMAT.I 5ROTHERR biV;5rQ\-
SHrARSO\LEH\/„qN BROTHERS NC ,iV,AmERTCAk E%r RESS CO?.fFAT7
Mc. May Miller
July 29, J.993
Pabe 2
The total issue size, thus, is $8,635,000, which, as I stated earlier, may change slightly. We
estimate an average interest rate of approximately 5.50%,reflecting the continuation of attractive
borrowing conditions. It is worth noting that the bond markets during the past ten days have
experienced uncertainty and yields have crept upward. The weekly Bond Buyer Index, for
example, increased from a 5.50% on July 15 to 5.61% on July 22, and we anticipate it will be
slightly higher today. Still, borrowing conditions remain attractive for municipal (and other)
borrowers.
I look forward to seeing you at Tuesday's Council Meeting. Please call me with any questions
before then.
City of Kent Washington Department Requests for 1994-2000 CIP 18-Mar-93
Gross New Net
DEPT Project Dedicated Project
RANK PROJ TITLE Cost Prior Funding Cost 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 BEYOND
SEWERAGE FUND -
STORM DRAINAGE PROJECTS
01 04 Ulid 306/Vatley Detention 14,317 6,353 7,045 919 919
02 05 Garrison Creek Flood And Erosion 4,790 853 1,626 2,311 958 1,353
03 06 _ Mill CreekFlood And Erosion Control 1,409 978 431 286 145
04 12 Horseshoe Acres Storm Pulp Station 380 100 280 280
05 NEW 3rd Ave Storm Trunk 1,200 650 550 270 280
06 NEW Downtown Improvements 220 110 110 110
07 07 Miscellaneous Drainage Improvements 1,096 1,096 353 365 378
08 NEW Streamside Restoration & Tree Planting 78 31 47 4 38 5
C9 14 Expand Ptblic Works Use Of shop 400 320 So 80
10 15 Outfall Treatment 5,620 5,620 353 1,782 3,485
11 11 Mill Creek Cleanup 53C 374 1C0 56 56
12 09 Milt Creek (Auburn)/Mullen Slough Flood 523 83 440 84 116 120 120
13 08 Green River Richt Bank Levee lmprcvenent 290 2,,a 290
-------------------------------- ---------------------------- ------------------
Total for Storm Drainage 30,853 8,554 10,069 12,230 3,643 4,479 3,988 120
City of Cent, washington
Sewerage System Revenue Refunding Bonds, 1993
Refunding of Callable 1996 Bonds
........... i==ii==f=i=itiLiziii LiLiii LS=
S O U R C E S A N D U S E S O F F U M D S
=====t==iii=====ii=L==ii=====iLiiii Riiif i/ii Rii
DELIVERY DATE: 8/25/93
sources of Funds
Par Amount of Bonds................... S3,500,000.00
+Premiun /•Discount................... s0.00
Bond Proceeds........................................... 3,500,000.00
Accrued Interest........................................ 11,649.67
Accrued Interest 1n Bond Find........................... 57,045.00
.............
53,568,694.67
Uses of Funds
vt:�.azisi
Refunding Escrow:
Initial Cash Deposit.................................. 99.00
Cost of SLGS.......................................... 3,482,200.D0
Costs of Issuance.......................( 2.000000%)... 70,000.00
Accrued Interest........................................ 11,649.67
Contingency............................................. 4,746.00
...................
13,568,694.67
Lehman Brothers
RUNDATE: 07.21-1993 9 14:08:26 FILENAME: KENTSVR KEY: REF
LEHMAN BROTHERS
Y City of Kent, llashingt on
Sewerage System Reve u Refunding Bonds, 1993
Refunding of Callable 1986 Bonds
.........f...
SAYINGS REPORT
DATE PRINCIPAL PROPOSED DEBT
DEBT SINTEREST - - - - PRIOR
GS
TOTAL D SAYINGS SAVINGS
-------- ------•------- -------•-- -------------- -------------- .............. -------------- ..............
Ill 1193 114,D90.00 125,739.67 68,694.67
�V ,t& 5/ 1/94 131,D58.75
11/ 1/94 65,000.00 3.300000 97,372.50 283,431.25 228,130.00 -55.251.25 13,443.42
5/ 1/95 156,300.00
fr
11/ 1195 40,000.00 3.700000 86,300.00 212,600.00 228,180.00 15,580.D0 29,023.42
S/ 1196 85,560.00
IT/ 1/96 45,000.00 1..100000 95,560.00 216,120.00 228,180.00 12,060.00 41,093.42
5/ 1/97 84,637.50
11/ 1/97 270,000.00 4.350000 84,637.50 439,275.D0 453,180.00 13,905.00 54,988.42
S/ 1/98 78,765.00
11/ 1/98 280,000.00 4.550000 78,765.00 437,530.D0 452,430.00 14,900.00 69,SM.42
5/ 1/99 72,395.00
11/ 1/99 290,000.00 4.750000 72,395.00 434,790.00 450,390.00 15,600.00 95,438.42
5/ 1/ 0 65,507.50
11/ 1/ 0 310,000.00 4.900000 65.507.50 441'015.00 452,030.00 11,015.00 96,503.42
S/ l/ 1 57,912.50
11/ 1/ 1 325,000.00 S.DOD000 57,912.50 "O,B25.00 451,955.00 11,130.00 107,633.42
5/ 1/ 2 49,787.50
11/ 1/ 2 335,000.00 5.100000 49,787.50 434,575.00 450,420.00 15,845.00 123,478.42
5/ 1/ 3 41,245.00
ll/ 1/ 3 355,000.00 5.200000 41,245.00 437,490.00 452,110.00 14,620.00 138,098.42
5/ 1/ 4 32,015.00
11/ 1/ 4 375,000.00 5.300000 32,015.00 439,030.00 451,950.00 12,920.00 151,018.42
5/ 1/ 5 22,077.50
ll/ 1/ 5 395,000.00 5.400000 22,077.50 439,155.00 449,940.00 10,785.00 161,803.42
5/ 1/ 6 11,412.50
ll/ 1/ 6 415,000.00 5.5020D0 11,412.50 437,825.00 451,080.00 13,255.00 175,058.42
-------------- -----.....--.-
3,500,000.D0 1,593,661.25 5,093,661.25 5,314,115.00 175,058.42
ACCRUED 11,649.67 11,649.67
3,500,000.00 1,582,011.58 5,082,011.58 5,314,115.00 175,058.42
C..... ......0 i L .i......... ......i....ii. iiii.....i
Dated 8/ 1/93 with Delivery of 8/25/93
Bond Tears 30,970.000
Average Coupon 5.145823
Average life 8.848571
N I C % 5.371848 % using 98.0000000
T I C 2 5.416603 % From Delivery Date
N 0 T E Cumulative Savings are Net of the Initial Transfer Amount of 57,045.00
N 0 T E Savings on 11/ 1/93 Include Accrued Interest of 11,649.67
Net Present value savings at: 5.3587% Equals 130,145.51 or 3.7184% of Par of the Current Issue
or 4.1713% of Per of the Prior Issue
N 0 T E : Present value Savings are Met of the Initial Transfer Amount of 57,045.00
Lehman Brothers
RUNDATE: 07-21-1993 @ 14:11:21 FILENAME: KENTSYR KEY: REF
LEHMAN BROTHERS
...........................
....,,,� . .,.. . �,... .. ._..�.
City of Kent, Washington
Sewerage System Revenue Refunding Bonds. 1993
Refunding of Callable 1966 Bonds
f.....a.....t..TZ....
DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE
.aa................
DATE PRINCIPAL COUPON INTEREST PERIOD.TOTAL _.FISCAL
-TOTAL
............. ........
5/ 1/94 131,058.75 131,058.75
11/ 1/94 65,000.00 3.300000 87,372.50 1$6,300.00 2B3 431.25
5/ 1/95 36,300.00 86
11/ 1/95 40,000.00 3.700000 56'560.00 126,300-00
0.00 212,600.00
5/ 1/96
11/ 1/96 45,D00.00 4.1D0000 85,560.00 130,560.00 216,120.00
5/ 1/97 84,637.50 84,637.50
11/ 1/97 270,000.00 4.350000 $4,637.50 35G,637.50 439,275.00
5/ 1/98 79,765.00 78,765.DO
11/ 1/98 280,000.DO 4.550000 78,765.00 358,765.00 1.37,530.00
5/ 1199 72,395.00 72395.00
11/ 1/99 290,000.00 4.750000 72,395.00 362:395.00 434,790.00
5/ i/ D 65,507.50 65,507.50
11/ 1/ 0 310,000.00 4.900000 65,507.50 357,9012.50 50 447,015.00
5/ 1/ 1
11/ 1/ 1 325,000.00 5.000000 57,912.50 382,912.50 440,825.00
5/ 1/ 2 49,787.50 49,787.50
11/ 1/ 2 335,000.00 5.100000 49,787.50 384,787.50 434,573.00
S/ 1/ 3 41,245.00 41 245.00
11/ 1/ 3 355,000.00 5.200000 41,245.00 396:245.00 437,490.00
32.015.00 32 015.00
5/ 1/ 4
11/ 1/ 4 375,000.00 5.300000 32,015.00 407:015.00 439,030.00
5/ 1/ 5 22,077.50 22,C77.5D
11/ 1/ 5 395,000.00 5.400000 22,C77.50 417,077.50 439,155.00
5/ 1/ 6 11,412.50 11,412.50
11/ 1/ 6 415,000.00 5.500000 .. .11,412_50 __ 426,412.50 437,125.00
3,500,000.00 1,593,661.25 5,093,661.25
ACCRUED11,649.67 11,649.67
3,500,000.00 1,582,011.58 5,082,011.58
..Wzaaczs z
Dated 8/ 1193 with Delivery of /25/93
Bond Tears 5.70.000
Average coupon ,5.145823
Average Life
N S C x 8571
5.371848 x using 98.0000000
- T I C x 5.416603 % From Delivery Date
Lehman Brothers
RUNDATE: 07.21-1993 14:08:02 FILENAME: KENTSVR KEY: REF
LEHMAN BROTHERS
City of Kent, Washington
Sewerage System Revenx Bonds, 1986
Remaining Debt Service on Callable Bonds
L StLCL CCLL LLL ifLLLL LL
DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE
iL ii LLLLLLL LL...L=
DATE PRINCIPAL COUPON INTEREST PERIOD TOTAL FISCAL TOTAL
_____________ ______________ _
11/ 1/93 _. 114'090.00 114,090.00 114,090.00
114,D90.00 114,090.00
5/ 1/94
11/ 1/94 114,090.00 114:090.00 228,180.00
5/ 195 114,090.00 114,09D.00
114,p90.00 228,180.00
111 1/95 114,090.00
5/ 1/96 114,D90.00 114,090.00
11/ 1/96 114,090.00 114,D90.00 228,180.00
5/ 1/97 114,090.00 114,D90.00
111 1/97 225,000.00 7.000000 114,095.00 106,D90.00 00 453,180.00
5/ 1/98
11/ 1198 240,000.00 7.100D00 106,215.00 346,215.00 452,430.00
5/ 1/99 97,695.00 97695.00
11/ 1/99 255,000.D0 7.200000 97,695.00 352:695.00 450,390.00
88,515.00 88,515.00
11/ 1/ 0 275,000.00 7.300000 88,515.00 363,515.00 452,030.00
5/ 1/ 1 477.50
11/ 1/ 1 295,000.00 7.300000 78,477.50 373,477.50 451,955.00
5/ 1/ 2 67,710.00 67,710.00
IT/ 1/ 2 315,000.00 7.400000 67710.00 382,710.00
450,420.00
5/ 1/ 3 ,
11/ 1/ 3 340,000.00 7.400000 56,055.00 396,055.00 452,110.00
5/ 1/ 4 43,475.00 43,475.00
11/ 1/ 4 365,000,00 7.400000 43,475.00 408,G75.00 451,950.00
5/ 1/ 5 29,970.00 29,970.DD
11/ 1/ 5 390,000.00 7.100000 29,970.00 419,970.00 449,940.00
15,54C.00 15540.00
11/ 1/ 6 420,000.D0 7.400000 15,54C.00 435:540.00 451.080.00
3,120,000.00 2,194,115.00 5,314,115.00
ACCRUED 72,257.00 72,257.00
3,120,000.00 2,121,858.00 5,241,858.00
LLLL.=LLLLL=== LL.=L=........ .......LLL.LLL
Dated 5/ 1/93 with Deliveery ofOD0 /25/93
Bond Years 7 346777
Average Coupon
Average Life 9.572115
M I C % 7.346777 % Using 100-0000000
T I C % 7.338040 % From Delivery Date
Lehman Brothers
RUNDATE: 07-21-1993 B 14:06:13 FILENAME: KENTSVR KEY: 1986
LEHMAN BROTHERS
City of Kent, YashiNton
Sewerage System Revere Bonds, 1986
Reauinin8 Debt service on Callable Bonds
..ec...v_c.................
DEBT SERYICE AND CALL REPORT
ORIGINAL PRINCIPAL CALL
DATE PRINCIPAL CALLED PREMIUM COUPON INTEREST ST FISCAL TOTAL
PERIOD TOTAL _
11! 1/93 114,090.00 114,090.00 114,090.00
5/ 1/93 114,090.00 114,090.00
11/ 1/94 114:090.00 114,090.00 228,180.00
114,090.00 114,090.00
5/ 1/95
11/ 1/95 114:090.00 114,090.D0 228,180.00
5/ 1/96 1% 090.D0 114,090.00
11/ 1/96 3,120,000.00 114,090.00 3,234,D90.D0 3,348,180.00
..............
3,120,000.00 798,630.00 3,915,630.00
ACCRUED 72,257.00 72,257.00
3,120,000.00 726,373.D0 3,846,373.00
..............
Dated 5/ 1/93 with Delivery of 8125/93
Lehman Brothers
RUNDATE: 07.21-1993 2 14:06:34 FILENAME: KENTSYR KEY: 1986
LEHMAN BROTHERS
City of Kent, Washington
Sewerage System Revenue Bonds, 1966
Remaining Debt Service on Callable Bonds
I..........=v.
CALLS PERFORMED
FIRST LAST
CALL CALL MATURITY MATURITY PRINCIPAL CALL CALL
NO. DATE CALLED CALLED CALLED PRICE PREM ILM
1) ll/ 1/96 ll/ 1/97 11/ 1/ 6 3,120,000.00 100.000 0.00
-------------- --------------
3,120,000.00 0.00
Lehman Brothers
RUNDATE: 07-21-1993 a 14:D6:35 FILENAME: KENTSWR KEY: 1986
LEHMAN BROTHERS
City of Kent, Nashington
Sewerage System Revenue Bonds, 1993
S4,750,000
iiiiiias iii sa."aw...
DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE
iiiit iiiiiiiiifii
DATE PRINCIPAL COUPON INTEREST PERIOD TOTAL .-FISCAL.TOTAL
..............
5/ 1194 188,827.50 138,527.50
11/ 1/94 90,000.00 3.300000 125,885.00 215,685.00 404,712.50
S/ 1/95 124,400.00 124,400.00
0.00
11/ 1/95 155,OD0.00 3.700000 121,532.50 279,400.00 4.03,60
5/ 1/96
11/ 1/96 160,000.00 4.1D0000 121,532.50 281,532.50 403,065.00
5/ 1/97 118,252.50 118252.50
11/ 1/97 165,000.00 4.350000 118,252.5D 293:252.50 401,505.00
S/ 1/98 114,663.75 114,663.75 404,327.50
it/ 1198 175,000.00 4.550000 iu,663-75 289,663.75
5/ 1/99 110,682.50 110,682.50
11/ 1/99 180,000.00 4.750000 110,682.50 290,682.50 401,365.00
5/ 1/ 0 1D6,407.50 106,407.50
11/ 1/ 0 190,000.00 4.900000 106,407.50 296ioi,407.50
402,815.00
5/ 1/ 1
11/ 1/ 1 200,000.00 5.000000 101,752.50 301,752.50 403,505.00
5/ 1/ 2 96,752.50 96,752.50
11/ 1/ 2 210,000.00 5.100000 96,752.50 306,752.50 403,505.00
5/ 1/ 3 91.397-50 91,397.50
11/ 1/ 3 220,000.00 5.200000 91,397.50 311,397.50 402,795.00
5/ 1/ c 85,677.50 85,677.50
tt/ 1/ 4 235,000.00 5.300000 85,677.50 32D,677.SD 406,355.00
5/ 1/ 5 79,450.00 79450.00
11/ 1/ 5 245,000.00 5.40000C 72,835.00 324:450.00
403,900.00
5/ 1/ 6
11/ 1/ 6 260,000.00 5.500000 72,935.00 332,835.00 405,670.00
5/ 1/ 7 65,685.00 65,685.00
11/ 1/ 7 270,o00.00 5.300000 65,685.00 335,685.00 1.01,370.00
5/ 1/ 8 57,855.00 57855.00
11/ 1/ 8 290,000.00 5.800000 57,855.00 347:855.00 405,710.00
3/ 1/ 9 49,445.00 49,445.00
11/ 1/ 9 305,000.00 5.800000 49,445.00 354,G45.00 403,890.00
5/ 1/10 40,600.00 40,600.00
11/ 1/10 320,000.00 5.800000 40,600.00
3600,600.00
0.00 401,200.00
5/ 1/11
11/ 1/11 340,000.00 5.800000 31,320.00 371,320.00 402,640.00
5/ 1/12 21,460.00 21,460.00
11/ 1/12 360,000.00 5.300000 21,460.00 381,460.00 402,920.00
SI 1/13 11,020.00 11,020.00
11/ 1/13 380,000.00 5.800000 11,020.00 391,020.00 402,040.00
_ .............. ..............
4,750,000.00 3,316,784.67 , 0.
709000 9,0670900
ACCRUED 67
4,750,000.00 3,300 305.33 8,050,305.33
•iiiiiiiiiiiiZ iii iiiiiZilifi
Dated 8/ 1/93 with W iSer617f500 125/93
Bond Years ,617.500
Average Co Won 15.563954
Average Life
N I C X 5.723303 % Using 96-0000000
T I C X 5.755817 X From Delivery Date
Lehman Brothers
RUNDATE: 07.21-1993 14:07:09 FILENAME: KENTSVR KEY: 4.75MM
LEHMAN BROTHERS
City of Kent, Washington
Sewerage System Revell-* Bonds, 1993
S385,000
ii LtLLTtiiLiiLLTR
DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE
iLTiiLiiitiLtitLLLC
DATE PRINCIPAL COUPON INTEREST PERIOD TOTAL ..FISCAL-TOTAL
.
5/ 1/94 13,271.25 13,271.25
11/ 1/94 35,000.00 3.300000 8,847.50 43,847.50 57,118.75
5/ 1195 5,270.00 8,270.00
11/ 1/95 35,000.00 3.7D0000 8,�2:50 43,22720.00 51,540.00
5/ 1/96
11/ 1/96 35,000.00 4.100000 7,622.50 42,622.50 50,245.00
5/ 1/97 6905.00 6,905.00
11/ 1/97 35,000.00 4.350000 6:905.00 41,905.00 48,810.00
5/ 1/98 6,143.75 6,143.75 47,287.50
IV1/98 35,000.00 4.55OD00 6,143.75 41,143.75
5/ 1/99 5,347.50 5,347.50
11/ 1/99 30,000.00 4.750000 5,347.50 35,347.50 40,6915.00
5/ 1/ 0 4,635.00 4,635.00
11/ 1/ 0 30,000.00 4.900000 4,635.00 34,635.00 39,270.00
5/ 1/ 1 3,900.00 3,900.00
11/ 1/ 1 30,D00.00 5.000000 3,900.00 33,900.00 37,800.00
5/ 1/ 2 3,150.00 3,150.00
1/ 2 30,000.00 5.100000 3,150.00 33:150.00 36,300.00
5/ 1/ 3 2,385.00 2,385.00
11/ 1/ 3 30,000.00 5.200000 2,385.00 32,385.OD 34,770.00
5/ 1/ 4 1,605.00 1,605.00
11/ 1/ 4 30,000.00 5.300000 1,605.00 31:605.00 33,210.00
5/ 1/ 5 910.00 810.00
5 30,000.00 5.400000 _810.00 - 30,810.00 31,620.00
.............
385,000.00 12.3 666.25 508,666.25
ACCRUED 1:179.67 1,179.67
385,000.00 122,486.58 507,486.58
TT LLLT....LLLL I.LLLTLLLT.... iiii LT.Tii.LLL
Doted B/ 1/93 with Delivery of 9/25193
Bond Years 2,511.250
Average Coy?on 4.924490
Average Life 6.522727
N I C % 5.231110 % using 98.0000000
1 1 C % 5.273984 % from Delivery Date
Lehman Brothers
RUNDATE: 07-21.1993 0 14:06:58 FILENAME: KENTSVR KEY: 385M
_ r
LEHMAN BROTHERS
' City of Kent, Washington
Sewerage System Revenue 50nds, 1993
s4,750,000 and $385,O00
, aaL LLLL iti Liii LLiLLii
DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE
a:su iiL iLiLiLLLLLii
DATE PRINCIPAL COUPON INTEREST PERIOD TOTAL FISCAL TOTAL
-------------- --"----'
5/ 1/94 202,D98.75 202,098.75
11/ 1/94 125,000.00 3.300000 134,732.50 Z59,732.50 "1,931.25
5/ 1/95 132,670.00 132,670.00
ll/ 1/95 1900,000.00 3.700000 132,670.00 670.00
455,340.00
5/ 1/96
111 1/96 195,000.00 4.100000 129,155.00 324,155.00 453,310.00
5/ 1/97 125,157.50 125,157.50
11/ 1/97 200,000,00 4.350D00 125,157.50 325,157.50 450,315.00
5/ 1/98 120,807.50 120,807.50
111 1/98 210,000.00 4.550000 120,907.50 330,807.50 451,615.00
5/ 1/99 116,030.00 116030.00
11/ 1199 210,000.00 4.750000 116,030.00 326:030.00 442,060.00
5/ 1/ 0 111,042.50 Ill 042.50
Ill 1/ 0 220,000.00 4.900000 111,042.50
05
,652.50 105t,652.50 G42'085 00
5/ 1/ 1
111 1/ 1 230,000.00 5.000000 105,652.50 335,652.50 "1,305.00
5/ 1/ 2 99,902.50 99,902.50
111 1/ 2 240,000.00 5.100000 99,902.50 339,902.50 439,305.00
5/ 1/ 3 93,782.50 93,782.50
11/ 1/ 3 250,000.00 5.200000 93,792.50 343,782.50 437,565.00
5/ 1/ 4 87,282.50 97,282.50
4 265,000.00 5.300000 87,282.50 352,282.50 439,565.00
5/ 1/ 5 90,260.00 80,260.00
ll/ 1/ 5 275,000.00 5.400000 80,26055
..00
00 372,260.00
,835.00 435,520.00
5/ 1/ 6
ll/ 1/ 6 260,000.00 5-500000 72,3355-00.00 332,835.00 00 405,670.00
65
S/ 1/ 7
ll/ 1/ 7 270,000.00 5.900000 65,685.00 335,685.00 G01,3 0.
S/ 1/ 8 57,855.00 57,955.00
11/ 1/ 8 290,000.00 5.800000 57,855.00 347,855.00 4,05,710.00
5/ 1/ 9 ` 49,445.00 494G5.00
11/ t/ 9 305,D00.00 5.800000 49,445.00 354:445.00 403,890.00
40,600.00 40,600.00
5/ 1/t0
11/ 1/10 320,000.00 5.800000 311,320.00 3311,320.00 401,200.00
5/ 1/11
11/ 1/11 3/0,000.00 5.8000D0 31,320.00 371,320.00 402,640.00
5/ 1/12 21,460.00 21,460.00
111 1/12 360,000.00 5.900000 21,460.00 381,46D.DD 4C2,920.00
S/ 1/13 11,020.00 11,020.00
ll/ 1/13 330,000.00 5.800000 11,020.00 391,020.00 402,040.00
..............
5,135,000.00 3,440756.25 9,575,756.25
ACCRUED 17:964.33 17,964.33
5,135,000.00 3,422,791.92 8,557,791.92
isiaaasasaaau asaivouiaci suaasiaaaaiai
Dated B/ 1/93 with Deli6eryof3125/93
Bond Years 512750
Average Coupon 1 .53.750
3106
Average Life
099075
N I C % 5.703408 % Using 99-0000000
T I C % 5.733190 % From Delivery Date
Lehman Brothers
RUNDATE: 07-21-1993 D 14:07:23 FILENAKE: KENTSWR KEY: 4.75mm-385K
LEHMAN BROTHERS
City of Kent, Washington
Sewerage System Revenue and Refunding Bonds, 1993
Combined Issuance
s:zsacs:sszastztr��-
DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE
f ......L.........
DATE PRINCIPAL COUPON INTEREST PERIOD TOTAL FISCAL TOTAL
----_--------- _______
5/ 1/94 333,157.50 333,157.50
ill 1/94 190,OOO.D0 3.3D0000 222,105.00 412,105.00 745,262.50
5/ 1/95 218,970.00 218,970.00
11/ 1/95 230,Oo0.00 3.700000 218 970.00 214,970.00 715.00 667,940.00
S/ 1/96
ll/ 1196 240,000.00 4.100000 214,715.D0 454,715.00 669,430.00
5/ 1/97 209,795.00 209,795.00
11/ 1/97 470,000.DO 4.350000 209,795.00 679,MOO 889,590.00
5/ 1/98 199,572.50 19-9,572.50
11/ 1/99 490,000.00 4.550000 199,572.50 689,572.50 839,145.00
5/ 1199 188425.00 188,425.00
11/ 1/99 500,000.00 4.750000 188:425.00 688,425.00 $76,950.00
5/ 1/ 0 176,550.00 176,550.00
00
11/ 1/ 0 530,000.00 4.900000 176 550.00
706,550.00 883,100.00
5/ l/ i
ill 1/ 1 555,000.00 5.000000 163,565.00 718,565.00 882,130.00
5/ 1/ 2 149690.00 149,690.00
ill l/ 2 575,000.00 5.100000 149:690.00 724,690.00 874,330.00
5/ 1/ 3 135027.50 135,027.50
Ill 1/ 3 605,000.00 5,200000 135:027.50 740,027.50 575,055.00
5/ 1/ 4 119,297.50 119,297.50
11/ 1/ 4 640,000,00 5.300000 119,297.50 759,297.50 87B,595.00
5/ 1/ 5 102:337.50 102,337.50
11/ 1/ 5 670,000.00 5.400000 10o2,;23�.50 T72.337.5D 574,675.00
5/ 1/ 6
11/ l/ 6 675,000.00 5.500000 65,685.00 59,247.50 843,495.00
5/ l/ 7
11/ 1/ 7 270,OOO.DO 5.300000 65,685.00 335,685.00 401,370.00
5/ l/ 8 57855.00 57,955.00
Ill l/ 8 290,000.00 5.800000 57:855.00 347,855.00 405,710.00
5/ l/ 9 49,445.00 49,LG5.00
ill 1/ 9 305,000.00 5.300000 49,445.00 354,445.00 <03,890.00
5/ 1/10 40,600.00 40,600.00
ill 1/10 320,000.00 5:800000 40,600.00
360,600.00
31
,320.00
L01,200.00
5/ i/11
11/ 1/11 340,000.00 5.800000 31,320.00 371,320.00 402,640.00
5/ 1/12 21,460.00 21,460.00
11/ 1/12 360,000.00 5.800000 21,4,60.00 331,460.00 402,920.00
5/ 1/13 11,020.00 11,020.00
Ill 1/13 380,000.00 5.600000 11,020.00 391,020.00 402,040.00
..............
8,635,000.00 5,034,1.17.50 13,669,417.50
ACCRUED 29:614.00 29,614.00
8,635,000.00 5,004803.50 13,639,503.50
isss�aa:ves• a.sae......... a.e:uus�assa
Dated B/ 1/93 with Delivery 98i750
5.98.750
/25/93
Bond Years
Average Coupon 10.407610
Average Life
781558
N 1 C % 5.593112 % Using 98.0000000
T I C % 5.620202 % from Delivery Date
Lehman Brothers
RUNDATE: 07.21.1993 D 14:11:43 FILENAME: KENTSWR KEY: ALL
r�
LEHMAN BROTHERS
city of smt, Washington
sewerage system Revenu " Refurtdim Bonds, 1993
Combined Issuame
DELIVERY DATE: B/25/93
8,635,000.00
Par 29,614.00
Accrued Interest ..................
Gross Yield Target Value
8,664,614.00
G R 0 S s Y I E L D 5.35871500 %
Lehman Brothers
RUMDATE: 07-21-1993 a 14:07:42 FILENAME: REMTSIIR KEY: ALL
LEHMAN BROTHERS
City of Kent, Washington
Sewerage System Revenue and Refunding Bonds, 1993
Combined Issuance
PV DATE: 8/25/1993 with 2 Cmgoudings using 30/360 Year Basis
PV RESULTS: PV TOTAL a 8,664,614.00 PV RATE 5.3587150D46
CASH - FLOW SUBTOTAL • 13,669,417.50
DATE AMOUNT RATE PV FACTOR PV AMOUNT
.......... ............... "-"-- ""..........-
5/ 1/1994 333,157.50 5.3587150 0.96450919 321,333.47
111 1/1994 412,105.00 5.3587150 0.93934089 387,107.08
S/ 1/1995 218,970.00 5.3587150 0.91432934 200,320.18
111 1/1995 448,970.00 5.3587150 0.89095741 400,013.15
5/ 1/1996 214,715.00 5.3587150 0.86770840 156,310.01
111 1/1996 454,715.D0 5.3537150 0.84506606 384,264.21
5/ 1/1997 209,795.00 5.3587150 0.82301456 172,664.34
11/ 1/1997 679,795.00 5.3587150 0.80153848 544,881.55
5/ 1/1998 199,572.50 5.3587150 0.78D62260 155,790.34
11/ 1/1998 689,572.50 5.3537150 0.76025291 524,249.50
5/ 1/1999 188,425.00 5.3587150 0.74041455 139,512.61
111 1/1999 688,425.00 5.3587150 0.72109387 496,419.05
5/ 1/2000 176,550.00 5.3587150 0.70227735 123,987.07
11/ 1/2000 706,550.00 5.3587150 0.68395184 483,246.17
5/ 1/2001 163,565.00 5.3587150 0.66610451 108,951.38
111 1/2001 718,565.00 5.3587150 0.64872291 466,149.58
5/ 1/2002 149,690.00 5.3587150 0.63179467 94,573.37
111 1/2002 724,690.00 5.3587150 0.61530855 445,907.95
S/ 1/2003 135,027.50 5.3587150 0.59925243 80,915.56
11/ 1/2003 740,027.50 5.3587150 C.58361529 431,891.37
S/ 1/2004 119,297.50 5.3587150 0.56838620 67,807.05
111 1/2004 759,297.50 5.3587150 0.55355449 420,312.54
5/ 1/2005 102,337.50 5.3587150 0.5391D981 55,171.15
11/ 1/2005 772,337.50 5.3587150 0.52504206 405,509.67
5/ 1/2006 84,247.50 5.3587150 0.5113-4140 43,079.23
11/ 1/2006 759,247.50 5.3587150 0.49799824 378,103.92
5/ 1/2007 65,685.00 5.3587150 0.4,8500327 31,857.44
11/ 1/2007 335,685.00 5.3587150 0.47234740 158,559.94
5/ 1/2008 57,855.00 5.3587150 0.46002177 26,614.56
11/ 112008 347,855.00 5.3587150 0."801777 155,845.22
5/ 1/2009 49,"S.00 5.3587150 0.43632701 21,574.19
11/ 112009 354,445.00 5.3587150 0.42494131 150,618.32
5/ 1/2010 40,600.00 5.3587150 0.41385272 16,902.42
it/ 1/2010 360,600.00 5.3587150 0.1.0305347 145,341.08
5/ 1/2011 31,320.00 5.3587150 0.39253603 12,294.23
11/ 1/2011 371,320.00 5.3587150 0.38229303 141,953.05
5/ 1/2012 21,460.00 5.3587150 0.37231732 7,989.93
11/ 1/2012 381,460.00 5.3587150 0.36260192 138,318.13
5/ 1/2013 11,020.00 5.3537150 0.35314004 3,891.60
11/ 1/2013 391,020.00 5.3587150 0.34392505 134,481.57
------------
SUBTOTAL 13,669,417.50 3,664,614.00
Lehman Brothers
RUNDATE: 07-21-1993 D 14:07:" FILENAME: KENTSWR KEY: ALL
LEHMAN BROTHERS
LEHMAN BROTHERS
$_,000
CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON
Sewerage System Improvement and
Refunding Revenue Bonds, 1993
PURCHASE CONTRACT
August 3, 1993
Honorable Mayor and Members of the
City Council
City of Kent
220 Fourth Avenue South
Kent, Washington 98032-5895
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council:
Lehman Brothers, a Division of Shearson Lehman Brothers Inc. (the "Purchaser") is pleased
to offer to purchase from the City of Kent (the "Seller") all of its $ .000 principal
amount of Sewerage System Improvement and Refunding Revenue Bonds, 1993
(the "Bonds"). This offer is based upon the terms and conditions set forth below and in
Exhibit A attached, which when accepted by the Seller shall constitute the terms and
conditions of our Purchase Contract for the Bonds. Those terms and conditions are as
follows:
1. Prior to the date of delivery and payment for the Bonds identified in paragraph i of
Exhibit A ("Closing"), the Seller shall pass an ordinance authorizing the issuance of
the Bonds (the 'Bond Ordinance") in form and substance acceptable to the
Purchaser.
2. The Seller shall sell and deliver to the Purchaser, and the Purchaser shall purchase,
accept delivery of and pay for the entire 000 principal amount of the Bonds,
and only that amount.
3. The Seller consents to and ratifies the use by the Purchaser of the information
contained in the Preliminary Official Statement relating to the Bonds, a copy of
which is attached to this Purchase Contract as Exhibit B (the "Preliminary Official
Statement"), in marketing the Bonds, authorizes the preparation of a Final Official
Statement (the "Final Official Statement") for the Bonds containing such revisions
and additions to the Preliminary Official Statement as the Finance Director and the
City Attorney of the Seller deem necessary, and further authorizes the use of the
Final Official Statement in connection with the public offering and sale of the
Bonds.
LEHM.I.N BROTHERS DRISION
SHF.IRSON LEH�LI.N BROTHERS INC. AN.AJ\IERIGI..N EXPRESS COMPANY
999THIRD AVENUE SUITE 4000 SEATTLE.WA 96104 206 344 3392 FAX 206 344 8073
4. The Seller represents, warrants to, and agrees with the Purchaser, as of the date
hereof and as of the date and time of Closing, that:
a. The Seller has and will have at Closing full legal right, power and authority
to enter into and perform its obligations under this Purchase Contract and
under the Bond Ordinance, to pass the Bond Ordinance and to sell and deliver
the Bonds to the Purchaser;
b. This Purchase Contract, the Bond Ordinance and the Bonds do not and will
not conflict with or create a breach of or default under any existing law,
regulation, judgment, order or decree or any agreement, lease or instrument
to which the Seller is subject or by which it is bound;
c. No governmental consent, approval or authorization other than the Bond
Ordinance is required in connection with the sale of the Bonds to the
Purchaser;
d. This Purchase Contract, the Bond Ordinance and the Bonds (when issued and
paid for by the Purchaser) are, and shall be at the time of Closing, legal,
valid and binding obligations of the Seller enforceable in accordance with
their respective terms, subject only to applicable bankruptcy, insolvency or
other similar laws generally affecting creditors' rights and principles of
equity if equitable remedies are sought;
e. The Bond Ordinance shall have been duly authorized by the Seller, shall be in
full force and effect and shall not have been amended except with the
written consent of the Purchaser at the time of Closing;
f. The Preliminary Official Statement, except as to matters corrected in the
Final Official Statement which shall be available within seven days of the
date this Purchase Contract is approved so that the Final Official Statement
is available to accompany confirmations that the Purchaser sends to its
customers in compliance with the requirements of Rule 15c2-12(b)(4) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and with the requirements of
Rule G-32 of the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board, shall be accurate
and complete in all material aspects as of its date with respect to
information obtained from or utilized by officers and employees of the Seller
in the normal course of their duties, and the Final Official Statement, which
will be available to Purchaser seven days after this Purchase Contract is
approved, shall be accurate and complete in all material respects as of its
date and as of the date of Closing to the knowledge and belief of such
officers and employees; and
g. Any certificate or copy of any certificate signed by any official of the Seller
and delivered to the Purchaser pursuant to or in connection with this
Purchase Contract shall be deemed a representation by the Seller to the
Purchaser as to the truth of the statements therein made and is delivered to
the Purchaser for such purpose only.
-2-
5. As conditions to the Purchaser's obligations hereunder:
a. From the date of the Seller's acceptance of this Purchase Contract to the
date of Closing, there shall not have been any:
(1) Material adverse change in the financial condition or general affairs of
the Seller;
(2) Event, court decision or proposed law, rule or regulation which may
have the effect of changing the federal income tax exemption of the
interest on the Bonds or the transactions contemplated by this Purchase
Contract or the Preliminary and Final Official Statements;
(3) International and national crisis, suspension of stock exchange trading or
banking moratorium materially affecting the marketability of the
Bonds; or
(4) Material adverse event with respect to the Seller which in the
reasonable judgment of the Purchaser requires or has required an
amendment, modification or supplement to the Final Official Statement
and such amendment, modification or supplement is not made.
b. At or prior to Closing, the Purchaser shall have received the following:
(1) The Bonds, in definitive form and duly executed and authenticated;
(2) A certificate of authorized officers of the Seller, in form and substance
acceptable to the Seller and Purchaser, to the effect: (i) that the
Seller's execution of the Final Official Statement is authorized, (ii)
that, to the knowledge and belief of such officers, the Preliminary
Official Statement did not as of its date and Final Official Statement
(collectively the "Official Statements") (including the financial and
statistical data contained therein) did not as of its date or as of the date
of Closing contain any untrue statement of material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make such statements, in light of the
circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; and (iii)
that the representations of the Seller contained in this Purchase
Contract are true and correct when made and as of Closing;
-3-
(3) An approving opinion or opinions of the law firm identified in paragraph
k of Exhibit A as bond counsel or from another nationally recognized
firm of municipal bond lawyers (either or both of which shall be referred
to as "Bond Counsel") satisfactory to the Purchaser and dated as of
Closing, to the effect: (i) that the Seller is duly organized and legally
existing as a city under..the laws of the State of Washington with full
power and authority to pass the Bond Ordinance and to issue and sell the
Bonds to the Purchaser; (ii) that the Bonds are valid, legal and binding
obligations of the Seller enforceable in accordance with their terms,
except to the extent that such enforcement may be limited by
bankruptcy, insolvency or other laws affecting creditors' rights and
principles of equity if equitable remedies are sought; (iii) the sections of
the Official Statement entitled "Security and Source of Payment for the
Bonds", in the Summary, and under the heading "THE BONDS" the
sections "Debt Service Coverage", "Reserve Account", "Flow of Funds",
"Future Parity Bonds" and "Certain Other Bond Covenants", "TAX
EXEMPTION" and "CERTAIN OTHER ' FEDERAL TAX
CONSEQUENCES", conform to the Bonds and applicable laws; and (iv)
that assuming compliance by the City with applicable requirements of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), including
arbitrage and arbitrage rebate requirements, interest on the Bonds is
excluded from gross income of registered owners for federal income tax
purposes under existing federal law; except that interest on the Bonds
received by corporations may be subject to an alternative minimum tax
and, in the case of certain corporations, an environmental and/or
foreign branch profits tax, and interest on the Bonds received by certain
S corporations may be subject to tax;
(4) A letter of Bond Counsel, dated the date of Closing and addressed to the
Purchaser, to the effect that it may rely upon the opinion or opinions in
subparagraph (3) above as if it or they were addressed to the Purchaser;
(5) A certificate of authorized officers of the Seller to the effect that no
litigation is pending, or to the knowledge of the Seller threatened,
against the Seller in any court: (i) to restrain or enjoin the sale or
delivery by the Seller of the Bonds; (ii) in any manner questioning the
authority of the Seller to issue, or the issuance or validity of, the Bonds;
(iii) questioning the constitutionality of any statute, ordinance or
resolution, or the validity of any proceedings, authorizing the issuance
of the Bonds; (iv) questioning the validity or enforceability of the Bond
Ordinance; (v) contesting in any way the completeness, accuracy or
fairness of the Official Statements; (vi) questioning the titles of any
officers of the Seller to their respective offices or the legal existence
of the Seller under the laws of the State of Washington; or (vii) which
might in any material respect adversely affect the transactions
contemplated herein and in the Official Statements to be undertaken by
the Seller;
-4-
(6) A certificate signed by authorized officers of the Seller to the effect
that the officers of the Seller who signed or whose facsimile signatures
appear on the Bonds were on the date of execution of the Bonds the duly
elected or appointed, qualified and acting officers of the Seller and that
their signatures are genuine or accurate facsimiles;
(7) A certificate of authorized officers of the Seller to the effect that the
Seller has not been and is not in default as to principal or interest
payments on any of its bonds or other obligations, and has not failed to
honor the provisions of any law providing for the restoring of a debt
service reserve fund to required levels;
(8) A certificate of authorized officers of the Seller to the effect that,
from the respective dates of the Official Statements and up to and
including the date of Closing, the Seller has not incurred any material
liabilities direct or contingent, nor has there been any material adverse
change* in the financial position, results of operations or condition,
financial or otherwise, of the Seller, except as described in the Official
Statements;
(9) A certified copy of the Bond Ordinance;
(10) A definitive copy of the Final Official Statement, signed on behalf of
the Seller by the City Finance Director;
(11) Letters from Moody's Investors Service and Standard & Poor's
Corporation confirming the Bonds' ratings of "_" and "_", respectively;
[ (12) Executed bond insurance policy from _J
(13) A certified copy of this Purchase Contract; and
(14) Such additional legal opinions, certificates, instruments and documents
as the Purchaser may reasonably request to evidence the truth,
accuracy and completeness, as of the date hereof and as of the date of
Closing, of the representations and warranties contained herein and of
the statements and information contained in the Official Statements
and the due performance by the Seller at or prior to Closing of all
agreements then to be performed and all conditions then to be satisfied
by the Seller.
6. The Seller shall pay the fees and disbursements of Bond Counsel, and the Seller's
other consultants and advisors, and the costs of preparing, printing, executing and
registering the Bonds. The Purchaser shall pay the costs of preparing, printing
and distributing the Final and Preliminary Official Statements (except in the
circumstances and to the extent set forth in paragraph 7 hereof), the fees and
disbursements of the Purchaser's counsel, if any, the printing and filing of blue
sky and legal investment surveys, where necessary, the Purchaser's expenses
relative to Closing, including the cost of federal funds, and the Purchaser's travel
expenses.
-5-
7. if, during the period ending on the earlier of September 1, 1993, or the date on
which the Purchaser shall have completed the distribution and delivery to the
public of all of the Bonds, any material adverse event affecting the Seller or the
Bonds shall occur which results in the Final Official Statement containing any
untrue statement of a material fact or omitting to state any material fact
necessary to make the Final Official Statement, or the statements or information
therein contained, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not
misleading, the Seller shall notify the Purchaser and, if in the opinion of the
Seller and the Purchaser such event requires a supplement or amendment to the
Final Official Statement, the party whose omission, misstatement or changed
circumstance has resulted in the supplement or amendment will at its expense
supplement or amend the Final Official Statement in a form and in a manner
approved by the Seller and the Purchaser.
8. Any notice or other communication to be given to the Seller under this Purchase
Contract shall be given by delivering the same in writing to its respective address
set forth above. Any notice or other communication to be given to the Purchaser
under this Purchase Contract shall be given by delivering the same in writing to
Lehman Brothers, 999 Third Avenue, Suite 4000, Seattle, Washington 98104-4021
(Attention: Richard B. King, Senior Vice President, Public Finance).
9. Upon acceptance of this Purchase Contract, this Purchase Contract shall be
binding upon the Seller and the Purchaser. This Purchase Contract is intended to
benefit only the parties hereto. The Seller's representations and warranties shall
survive any investigation made by or for the Purchaser, delivery and payment for
the Bonds, and the termination of this Purchase Contract, except that such
representations and warranties contained in the Official Statement shall not
survive if Purchaser becomes aware that the facts contained in the Official
Statement are incorrect or misleading and Purchaser fails to advise Seller of such
incorrect or misleading statements. Should the Purchaser fail (other than for
reasons permitted in this Purchase Contract) to pay for the Bonds at Closing, the
amount set forth in paragraph n, of Exhibit A shall be paid by the Purchaser as
liquidated damages in full, and costs shall be borne in accordance with Section 6.
Should the Seller fail to satisfy any of the foregoing conditions or covenants, or if
Purchaser's obligations are terminated for any reason permitted under this
Purchase Contract, then neither the Purchaser not the Seller shall have any
further obligations under this Purchase Contract, except that any expenses
incurred shall be borne in accordance with Section 6.
-6-
10. This offer expires on the date set forth in paragraph m of Exhibit A.
Respectfully submitted,
LEHMAN BROTHERS
Richard B. King
Senior Vice President
Public Finance - Seattle
ACCEPTED by the City of Kent, Washington, this 3rd day of August, 1993.
CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON
By
Dan Kelleher, Mayor
RBK:lf/0123C
Enclosures
-7-
EXHIBIT A
DESCRIPTION OF BONDS
a. Purchase Price: $ per $100.00 par value, or $ which reflects
an underwriting discount of $ and an original issue discount of $ ,
plus accrued interest from August 1, 1993 to the date of Closing.
b. Denominations: $5,000 or any integral multiple thereof within a single
maturity.
c. Dated Date: August 1, 1993.
d. Form: Fully registered with privileges of exchange at the expense of the Seller.
e. Interest Payable: Interest will be payable semi-annually on each May 1, and
November 1 beginning May 1, 1994.
f. Maturity Schedule: The Bonds mature on November 1 in the years and bear
interest at the rates set forth below:
Maturity Amount Interest Rate Maturity Amount Interest Rate
1994 2000
1995 2001 -.-
1996 2002 -.-
1997 -.— 2003 -.-
1998 - — 2004 -.-
1999 2005 -.-
2006 -.—
Term Bonds 2013 -.-
g. Net Interest Cost:
h. Optional Redemption: The Bonds are maturing in the years 1994 through 2002,
inclusive shall be issued without the right or option of early redemption. The
Seller reserves the right to redeem the Bonds maturing on and after
November 1, 2003, as a whole at anytime, or in part from maturities selected
by the Seller on November 1, 2002, and on any interest payment date
thereafter at par plus accrued interest to the date of redemption. The Bonds
maturing on November 1, 2013 are Term Bonds and are subject to mandatory
redemption as described below in paragraph "o".
i. Location and Estimated Closing Date: Seattle, Washington, August 25, 1993.
j. Required Ratings of Bonds: Moody's "_" and Standard & Poor's "_", [which
are based on _ bond insurance.]
k. Bond Counsel: Foster Pepper & Shefelman.
1. Method of Payment: Federal Funds draft or wire.
m. Offer Expires: August 3, 1993, 11:00 p.m. Pacific Daylight Savings Time.
-8-
n. Liquidated Damages: $2,000.
o. Mandatory Redemption: The Term Bonds maturing on November 1, 2013, if not
previously called for optional redemption or purchased in the open market,
shall be redeemed at par plus accrued interest to the date of such redemption
by lot on each November 1 in accordance with the following schedule:
Year Amount Year Amount
2007 $ 2010 $
2008 2011
2009 2012
2013
RBK:If0123C
-9-
DRAFT OF 7/16/93
CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Kent, Washington,
relating to the combined sewerage collection and disposal
system and storm and surface water utility of the City;
providing for the issuance of $ principal
amount of Sewerage System Improvement and Refunding
Revenue Bonds, 1993 , of the City for the purposes of
providing a part of the funds to carry out a system or
plan of additions to and betterments and extensions of
that utility as adopted by Ordinance No. ; providing
funds with which to pay the cost of refunding, paying and
redeeming the callable portion of the City's outstanding
Sewerage System Revenue Bonds, 1986; fixing the date,
form, maturities, interest rates, terms and covenants of
those bonds; providing a reserve for those bonds;
providing for and authorizing the purchase of certain
obligations out of the proceeds of the sale of the
refunding bonds herein authorized and for the use and
application of the money derived from those investments;
authorizing the execution of a contract with
of , Washington,
as refunding trustee; and approving the sale and
providing for the delivery of the bonds to Lehman
Brothers Division of Shearson Lehman Brothers Inc. of
Seattle, Washington.
This document was prepared by:
FOSTER PEPPER & SHEFELMAN
1111 Third Avenue, Suite 3400
Seattle, Washington 98101
(206) 447-4400
0075443.02
City of Kent, Washington
Sewerage System Improvement and Refunding Revenue Bonds, 1993
Table of Contents
Page
Recitals . . • • . • • • • • • . • . . . . . •
Section 1. Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . .
Section 2 . Findings Regarding Parity Provisions . . . . . .
Section 3 . Authorization and Description of Bonds . . . . . .
Section 4 . Registration and Transfer of Bonds . . . . . . . .
Section 5. Payment of Bonds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Section 6 . Optional Redemption and open Market Purchase
of Bonds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Section 7 . Notice of Redemption . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Section 8 . Failure to Redeem Bonds . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Section 9 . Payments into Bond Fund . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Section 10. Pledge of Revenue and Lien Position . . . . . . .
Section 11. Sufficiency of Gross Revenue . . . . . . . . . . .
Section 12 . Form and Execution of Bonds . . . . . . . . . . .
Section 13 . Bond Registrar . . . . . . . . . . . • . . •
Section 14 . Construction Fund . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Section 15. Disposition and Use of Bond Proceeds . . . . . . .
Section 16. Refunding of the Refunded Bonds . . . . . . . . .
(a) Appointment of Refunding Trustee . . . . . . .
(b) Acquisition of Acquired Obligations . . . . .
(c) Substitution of Acquired Obligations . . . . .
(d) Administration of Refunding Plan . . . . . .
(e) Authorization for Refunding Trust
Agreement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Section 17. Call for Redemption of the Refunded Bonds . . . .
Section 18 . City Findings with Respect to Refunding . . . . .
Section 19 . Covenants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(a) ULID Assessments . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
00 544s.02
—i—
(b) Rates and Charges . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(c) Good Repair . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(d) Limitation on Sale of Property . . . . . . . .
(e) Accounts and Records . . . . . . . . . . . .
(f) No Free Service; Enforcement of Accounts
and ULID Assessments . . . . . . . . . . . .
(g) Self-Insurance and Insurance . . . . . . .
(h) Payment of Obligations . . . . . . . . . .
(i) Limitation on Substantial Reduction of
GrossRevenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(j) Preservation of tax Exemption for
Interest on Bonds . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Section 20. Future Parity Bonds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Section 21. Priority of Payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Section 22 . Bond Negotiable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Section 23 . Refunding or Defeasance of Bonds . . . . . . . . .
Section 24 . Approval of Bond Purchase Contract . . . . . . . .
Section 25. Preliminary official Statement Deemed "Final"
Section 26 . Temporary Bond . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Section 27 . Amendatory and Supplemental ordinances . . . . . .
27 . 1 Provisions Exclusive . . . . . . . . . . . .
27 . 2 Amendments Without Consent of
Bondowners . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
27. 3 Amendments With Consent of Bondowners . . .
27. 4 Effect of Amendments . . . . . . . . . . . .
Section 28 . Effective Date . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Signatures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
0075443.02
-11-
CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Kent, Washington,
relating to ',he combined sanitary sewerage collection and
disposal system and storm and surface water utility of
the City; providing for the issuance of $
principal amount of Sewerage System Improvement and
Refunding Revenue Bonds, 1993 , of the City for the
purposes of providing a part of the funds to carry out a
system or plan of additions to and betterments and
extensions of that utility as adopted by Ordinance No.
; providing funds with which to pay the cost of
refunding, paying and redeeming the callable portion of
the City's outstanding Sewerage System Revenue Bonds,
1986; fixing the date, form, maturities, interest rates,
terms and covenants of those bonds; providing a reserve
for those bonds; providing for and authorizing the
purchase of certain obligations out of the proceeds of
the sale of the refunding bonds herein authorized and for
the use and application of the money derived from those
investments; authorizing the execution of a contract with
of
Washington, as refunding trustee; and approving the sale
and providing for the delivery of the bonds to Lehman
Brothers Division of Shearson Lehman Brothers Inc. of
Seattle, Washington.
WHEREAS, the City of Kent, Washington (the "City") , operates
and maintains a system of sewerage pursuant to the provisions of
RCW 35. 67 . 020, 35 . 21. 120, 35.92 . 020 and 35A. 80. 010; and
WHEREAS, the City established a storm and surface water
utility and adopted a system or plan of storm water collection and
treatment for the City by Ordinance No. 2325, passed on
December 21, 1981; and
WHEREAS, the City combined its storm and surface water utility
with its sanitary sewage collection and disposal system and its
garbage and refuse collection and disposal system, the combined
system to be referred to as the "system of sewerage, " by Ordinance
No. 2547 , passed on April 1, 1985; and
0075143.02
WHEREAS, by Ordinance No. 2665, passed on October 20, 1986,
the City removed its garbage and refuse collection and disposal
system from its system of sewerage; and
WHEREAS, the City adopted the "City of Kent Surface Drainage
Utility Drainage Master Plan, " dated February 20, 1985 (the
"Drainage Master Plan") , by Ordinance No. 2547, as the system or
plan of additions to and betterments and extensions of the storm
and surface water utility; and
WHEREAS, the City has heretofore issued under date of
November 1, 1986, pursuant to Ordinance No. 2666, its Sewerage
System Revenue Bonds, 1986 (the 111986 Bonds") , in the principal
amount of $4 , 600, 000, to provide the funds necessary to carry out
a portion of the Drainage Master Plan; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Section 12 of Ordinance
No. 2666, the City covenanted and agreed that it would not issue
any Future Parity Bonds (as therein defined) except upon compliance
with the following conditions:
" (a) At the time of the issuance of such Future
Parity Bonds, there shall be no deficiency in the Bond
Fund.
" (b) The ordinance providing for the issuance of
such Future Parity Bonds shall provide that all
assessments and interest thereon, except for prepaid
assessments used to pay costs of improvements, which may
be levied in any ULID hereafter created for the purpose
of paying, in whole or in part, the principal of and
interest on such Future Parity Bonds, shall be paid
directly into the Bond Fund.
" (c) The ordinance authorizing the issuance of such
Future Parity Bonds shall provide for the payment of
sinking fund requirements into the Bond Fund for any Term
Bonds to be issued and for regular payments to be made
for the payment of the principal of such Term Bonds on or
before their maturity, or, as an alternative, the
mandatory redemption of such Term Bonds prior to their
0075443.02
-2-
maturity date from money in the Principal and Interest
Account and Assessment Account.
11 (d) The ordinance authorizing the issuance of any
Future Parity Bonds shall provide for the payment of the
principal of and interest thereon out of tha Bond Fund.
" (e) The ordinance providing for the issuance of
such Future Parity Bonds shall provide for the payment of
an amount equal to the Reserve Requirement for those
Future Parity Bonds into the Reserve Account in the Bond
Fund from the Future Parity Bond proceeds and, to the
extent such Reserve Requirement is not funded from Future
Parity Bond proceeds, then from money in the Reserve
Account in excess of the Reserve Requirement of all bonds
then payable from the Bond Fund and from the Net Revenue
of the Sewerage system in sixty approximately equal
monthly payments. The requirement of this subsection is
subject to the city's right to fund all or a portion of
the Reserve Requirement with a Reserve Account
Instrument. In the event such Future Parity Bonds are
issued for the purpose of refunding outstanding Bonds
and/or Future Parity Bonds, the amount of such reserve
allocated to such bonds being so refunded shall be
retained or used as a reserve for such refunding Future
Parity Bonds or used to retire outstanding Bonds or
outstanding Future Parity Bonds pursuant to the refunding
plan, which reserve amount shall be replaced in the same
manner and within the same time as required for
additional Future Parity Bonds, or such reserve may
remain in the Reserve Account to be used as the reserve
for remaining bonds payable from the Bond Fund.
" (f) At the time of the issuance of such Future
Parity Bonds, the City shall have on file a certificate
from an independent, licensed professional engineer -
experienced in the design, construction and operation of
municipal utilities, or a certified public accountant,
stating that in his or her professional opinion the Net
Revenue of the Sewerage System for any twelve consecutive
calendar months out of the immediately preceding
twenty-four calendar months, together with the projected
collections of ULID Assessments, shall be equal to the
Coverage Requirement for each year thereafter. However,
if Future Parity Bonds proposed to be so issued are for
the sole purpose of refunding outstanding bonds payable
from the Bond Fund, such certification of coverage shall
not be required if the Annual Debt Service in each year
for the refunding bonds is not increased over the amount
required for the bonds to be refunded thereby and the
maturities of those refunding bonds are not extended
beyond the maturities of the bonds to be refunded
thereby.
0075443.02
-3-
"The engineer's or accountant's certificate, in
estimating the Net Revenue of the Sewerage System
available for debt service, shall use the historical Net
Revenue of the Sewerage System for any twelve consecutive
months out of the twenty-four months immediately
preceding the month of delivery of the Future Parity
Bonds. Such, Net Revenue may be adjusted to reflect:
11 (1) Any changes in rates in effect and being
charged or expressly committed by ordinance of the
City Council to be made in the future;
11 (2) Income derived from customers of the
Sewerage System that have become customers during
the twelve consecutive month period or thereafter
adjusted to reflect one year's net revenue from
such customers;
11 (3) Revenues from any customers to be
connected to the Sewerage System who have paid the
required connection charges;
11 (4) The revenue to be deposited in the
Revenue Fund which is derived from any person,
firm, corporation or municipal corporation under
any executed contract for Sewerage System service,
which revenue was not included in the historical
Net Revenue of the Sewerage System; and
11 (5) The engineer's or accountant's estimate
of the Net Revenue to be derived by the City from
customers with improved property available to
connect to any additions to and improvements and
extensions of the Sewerage System to be paid for
out of the proceeds of the sale of the additional
Future Parity Bonds or other additions to and `
improvements and extensions of the Sewerage System
then under construction and not fully connected to
the facilities of the Sewerage System when such
additions, improvements and extensions are
completed.
"Actual or reasonably anticipated changes in the
Operating and Maintenance Expenses subsequent to such
twelve-month period shall be added or deducted, as is
applicable.
"The engineer's or accountant's certificate required
by this subparagraph (f) in setting forth the estimate of
ULID Assessments for ULID improvements being financed by
the proposed Future Parity Bonds shall be computed in
accordance with the following formula:
0075443.02
-4-
" (i) The amount of the ULID Assessments paid
within the 30-day period permitted by law for the
payment of ULID Assessments without penalty or
interest shall be applied in the year of payment,
or, if that 30-day period has not elapsed, 15% of
each total assessment roll shall be applied for the
year in which it is anticipated such prepayment
period will end as the estimated amount of the ULID
Assessments that will be paid within such 30-day
period.
" (ii) 10$ of the balance of each such
assessment roll shall then be deducted for
estimated nonpayment of ULID Assessments.
" (iii) The balance remaining after the
deductions provided in subparagraphs (i) and (ii)
immediately above shall then be divided by the
number of years in which installments of such ULID
Assessments may be paid without becoming
delinquent, and there shall be added to each year
the interest that will be collected on such
installments.
"In computing the installments of ULID Assessments
previously levied that will be collected each year, the
following formula shall be used:
" (i) All delinquent ULID Assessments or
installments shall be deducted from each assessment
roll.
The balance remaining after the
deductions provided in subparagraph (i) immediately
above shall then be divided by the number of years
in which installments of such ULID Assessments may "
be paid without being delinquent and there shall be
added to each year the interest that will be
collected on such installments.
"No engineer's or accountant's certificate provided for
in this paragraph (f) shall be required in connection
with the issuance of a ULID Assessment Bond issue if the
amount of bonds proposed to be issued does not exceed the
ULID Assessments levied in support of such ULID
Assessment Bond Issue by more than $5, 000 plus any amount
of the proceeds of such bonds deposited in the Reserve
Account as capitalized reserve. "
and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Ordinance No. 2666, the City reserved the
right and option to redeem the 1986 Bonds maturing on or after
0075443.02
-5-
November 1, 1997, on November 1, 1996, and on any interest payment
date thereafter, at par plus accrued interest to the date fixed for
redemption; and
WHEREAS, there are presently outstanding $3 , 120, 000 principal
amount of 1986 Bonds maturing on November 1 of each of the years
1997 through 2001, inclusive, and in 2006, and bearing interest at
various rates from 7. 001 to 7.40% (the "Refunded Bonds") ; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the
Refunded Bonds may be refunded by the issuance and sale of the
revenue bonds authorized herein (the "Bonds") so that a substantial
savings will be effected by the difference between the principal
and interest costs over the life of the Bonds and the principal and
interest costs over the life of the Refunded Bonds but for such
refunding, which refunding will be effected by
(a) The issuance of the Bonds;
(b) The payment of the interest on the Refunded
Bonds when due up to and including November 1, 1996, and,
on November 1, 1996, the call, payment and redemption of
all the outstanding Refunded Bonds at a price of par;
and
WHEREAS, to effect that refunding in the manner that will be
most advantageous to the City and its ratepayers, the City Council
finds it necessary and advisable that certain acquired obligations
(hereinafter defined) bearing interest and maturing at the time or
times necessary to accomplish the refunding as aforesaid be
purchased out of the proceeds of the sale of the Bonds; and
[INSERT RECITALS REGARDING NEW MONEY PURPOSES
(define as "Improvements") ]
0075443.02
-6-
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is necessary
to issue and sell $ par value of Bonds to provide the
funds necessary to carry out the Improvements, to refund the
Refunded Bonds and to pay the costs of the refunding and the
issuance and sale of the Bonds; and
WHEREAS, Lehman Brothers Division of Shearson Lehman Brothers
Inc. ("Lehman Brothers") has offered to purchase those Bonds under
the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN
as follows•
Section 1. Definitions. As used in this ordinance, the
following words shall have the following meanings:
"Acquired Obligations" shall mean those United States
Treasury Certificates of Indebtedness, Notes and Bonds--State and
Local Government Series- and other direct, noncallable obligations
of the United States of America purchased to accomplish the
refunding of the Refunded Bonds as authorized by this ordinance.
"Annual Debt Service" for the applicable issue or series
of Outstanding Parity Bonds, Bonds and Future Parity Bonds for any
calendar year shall mean all the interest, plus all principal
(except principal of Term Bonds due in any Term Bond Maturity Year
to the extent that those Term Bonds are subject to either mandatory
prior redemption or sinking fund requirements) , and plus all
mandatory redemption and sinking fund requirements for that year,
less all bond interest payable from the proceeds of any such
Outstanding Parity Bonds, Bonds or Future Parity Bonds in that
year.
0075443.02
-7-
"Assessment Account" shall mean the account of that name
created in the Bond Fund by section 5 of Ordinance No. 2666.
"Assessment Bonds" shall mean the original principal
amount of any issue of Future Parity Bonds equal to the total
principal amount of ULID Assessments on any final assessment roll
or rolls of one or more ULIDs formed in connection with the
improvements being financed by such issue of Future Parity Bonds.
When a bond of any issue of bonds containing Assessment Bonds is
redeemed or purchased, and retired, the same percentage of that
bond as the percentage of Assessment Bonds is to that total issue
of bonds shall be treated as being redeemed or purchased, and
retired.
"Average Annual Debt Service" shall mean, as of any
calculation date, the sum of the Annual Debt Service for the
remaining calendar years to the last scheduled maturity of the
applicable issue or series of Outstanding Parity Bonds, Bonds and
Future Parity Bonds divided by the number of those years.
"Bond Fund" shall mean the Sewerage System Revenue Bond
Fund, 1986, created by Section 5 of Ordinance No. 2666 for the
purpose of paying and securing the principal of and interest on the
Outstanding Parity Bonds, Bonds and any Future Parity Bonds.
"Bond Register" shall mean the books or records
maintained by the Bond Registrar on which are recorded the names
and addresses of the owners of each of the Bonds.
"Bond Registrar" shall mean the fiscal agencies of the
State of Washington in Seattle, Washington, and New York, New York,
as the same may be designated from time to time.
0075443.02
-8-
"Bonds" shall mean the $ principal amount of
Sewerage System Improvement and Refunding Revenue Bonds, 1993 ,
authorized to be issued by this ordinance.
111986 Bonds" shall mean the Sewerage System Revenue
Bonds, 1986, of the City dated November 11 1986, authorized to be
issued by Ordinance No. 2666
"City" shall mean the City of Kent, Washington, a duly
organized and existing non-charter code city under the laws of the
State of Washington.
"Code" shall mean the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended, and applicable rules and regulations promulgated
thereunder.
"Construction Fund" shall mean the
Construction Fund, 1993 , of the City created and established by
this ordinance in the office of the City Finance Director.
"Coverage Requirement" shall mean Net Revenue of the
Sewerage System at least equal to the sum of:
(i) 1. 25 times the Annual Debt Service in that
current year on applicable Outstanding Parity Bonds,
Bonds and Future Parity Bonds which are not Assessment
Bonds,
(ii) plus an amount at least equal to 1. 00
times the Annual Debt Service in that current year on all
Assessment Bonds minus collections of ULID Assessments,
(iii) plus any additional amount necessary to
make the required Reserve Account deposits in that
current year on all outstanding Outstanding Parity Bonds,
Bonds and Future Parity Bonds.
Annual Debt Service on Assessment Bonds is that portion of Annual
Debt Service on all Outstanding Parity Bonds, Bonds and Future
Parity Bonds determined by multiplying the quotient of Assessment
0075443.02
-9-
Bonds divided by the total of all Outstanding Parity Bonds, Bonds
and Future Parity Bonds times Annual Debt Service on all
Outstanding Parity Bonds, .Bonds and Future Parity Bonds. For the
purposes of determining the Coverage Requirement for the issuance
of Future Parity Bonds having variable interest rates, such bonds
shall be assumed to bear interest at a fixed rate equal to the
higher of 8. 5% and the highest variable rate borne by any
outstanding variable rate Sewerage System bonds of the City during
the preceding 24 months, or if no such variable rate bonds are
outstanding at the time of calculation, the rate borne by other
variable rate debt the interest rate for which is determined by
reference to an index comparable to the index to be used to
determine the variable interest rate on the Future Parity Bonds
then proposed to be issued.
"Drainage Master Plan" shall mean the "City of Kent
Surface Drainage Utility Drainage Master Plan, " dated February 20,
1985.
"Future Parity Bonds" shall mean any and all revenue
bonds of the City issued after the date of the issuance of the
Bonds pursuant to the provisions of Section 12 of Ordinance No.
2666, the payment of the principal of and interest on which
constitutes a lien and charge upon the Gross Revenue of the
Sewerage System and ULID Assessments on a parity with the lien and
charge of the Outstanding Parity Bonds and Bonds upon such Gross
Revenue and ULID Assessments.
"Government Obligations" shall mean direct obligations of
the United States of America.
W75443.02
-10-
"Gross Revenue of the Sewerage System" or "Gross Revenue"
shall mean all the earnings and revenue received by the Sewerage
System from any source whatsoever, except general ad valorem taxes,
ULID Assessments,. grants from state, federal or local governments,
earnings in any refunded bond escrow account or fund, gifts to the
Sewerage System for capital purposes, proceeds from the sale of
City property, and original proceeds of City or Sewerage System
obligations.
"Improvements" shall mean that [portion of the Drainage
Master Plan described in Exhibit A of Ordinance No. and
ordered to be carried out by that ordinance] [or add description] .
"Maximum Annual Debt Service" shall mean, as of any
calculation date, the maximum amount of Annual Debt Service which
shall mature or come due in the current calendar year or any future
calendar year.
"Net Revenue of the Sewerage System" or "Net Revenue"
shall mean the Gross Revenue of the Sewerage System less Operating
and Maintenance Expenses.
"Nonrefunded 1986 Bonds" shall mean the 1986 Bonds
maturing in the years 1993 through 1996, inclusive.
"Operating and Maintenance Expenses" shall mean all
reasonable expenses incurred by the City in causing the Sewerage
System to be operated and maintained in good repair, working order
and condition, including, without limitation, payments (other than
payments out of proceeds of the outstanding Parity Bonds, Bonds or
Future Parity Bonds) of premiums for insurance on the Sewerage
System, and any State-imposed taxes, and also including all
0075443.02
-11-
payments made to another agency for drainage and sewerage service,
but excluding depreciation and amortization, and any City-imposed
utility taxes or payments in lieu of taxes.
"Outstanding Parity Bonds" shall mean the outstanding
Nonrefunded 1986 Bonds.
"Permitted Investments" shall mean:
(i) bonds, notes and other evidences of direct
indebtedness of the United States of America and securities
unconditionally guaranteed as to the payment of principal and
interest by the United States of America;
(ii) obligations of the Federal National Mortgage
Association, the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, the
Government National Mortgage Association, Federal Intermediate
Credit Banks, Federal Banks for Cooperatives, Federal Land Banks,
Federal Home Loan Banks, or Export-Import Bank of the United States
which are authorized investments for City funds under the laws of
the State of Washington;
(iii) direct obligations of, or obligations
unconditionally guaranteed by, the State of Washington, or of any
municipal corporation of the State of Washington, the obligations
of which are authorized •.investments for City funds under the laws
of the State of Washington and are rated Aa or better by Moody's
Investors Service, Inc. , and AA or better by Standard & Poor's
Corporation;
(iv) deposits with a designated qualified public
depository defined as such by the laws of the State of Washington,
the deposits of which are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation and which
(a) has an unsecured, uninsured and unguaranteed
obligation rated Aa2 or better by Moody's Investors Service,
Inc. , or AA or better by Standard & Poor's Corporation; or
(b) is the lead bank of a parent holding company
with an unsecured and unguaranteed obligation rated Aa2 or
better by Moody's Investors Service, Inc. , and AA or better by
Standard & Poor's Corporation; or
(c) has combined capital, surplus and undivided
profits of not less than $3, 000, 000, provided that the
principal plus interest to accrue over the term of the deposit
is fully insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
or secured by investments described in (i) , (ii) and (iii)
above; and
0075443.02
-12-
(v) deposits with any savings and loan institution
operating under the laws of the State of Washington having combined
capital, surplus and undivided profits of not less than $31000, 000,
provided that the principal plus interest to accrue over the term
of the deposit is fully insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation or secured by investments described in (i) , (ii) and
(iii) above.
"Principal and Interest Account" shall mean the account
of that name created in the Bond Fund for the payment of the
principal of and interest on the Outstanding Parity Bonds, the
Bonds and any Future Parity Bonds.
"Refunded Bonds" shall mean all of the outstanding 1986
Bonds maturing on November 1 of each of the years 1997 through
2001, inclusive, and in 2006.
"Refunding Plan" shall mean:
(a) the placement of proceeds of the Bonds which,
with other money of the City, if necessary, will be
sufficient to acquire the Acquired Obligations to be
deposited, with cash, if necessary, with the Refunding
Trustee;
(b) the payment of the interest on the Refunded
Bonds when due up to and including November 1, 1996, and,
on November 1, 1996, the call, payment and redemption of
all of the outstanding Refunded Bonds at a price of par;
and
(c) the payment of the costs of issuing the Bonds
and the costs of carrying out the foregoing elements of
the Refunding Plan.
"Refunding Trust Agreement" shall mean a Refunding Trust
Agreement between the City and the Refunding Trustee substantially
in the form of that which is on file with the City Clerk and by
this reference incorporated herein.
"Refunding Trustee" shall mean Bank
of , Washington, or any successor trustee.
0075443.02
-13-
"Reserve Account" shall mean the account of that name
created in the Bond Fund for the purpose of securing the payment of
the principal of and interest on the Outstanding Parity Bonds, the
Bonds and any Future Parity Bonds.
"Reserve Account Instrument" shall mean, by way of
example and not of limitation, letters of credit, bond insurance
policies, surety bonds, standby bond purchase agreements, lines of
credit and other devices.
"Reserve Requirement" shall mean:
(1) For the Bonds, $ ; and
(2) For any issue of Future Parity Bonds, to be
fixed at the time of their issuance, the lesser of the
Maximum Annual Debt Service or 125% of the Average Annual
Debt Service on those Future Parity Bonds.
(3) Notwithstanding paragraphs (1) and (2) above,
the deposit to be made into the Reserve Account, and the
Reserve Requirement, shall each be decreased for any
issue of Future Parity Bonds when and to the extent that
the city has provided for a Reserve Account Instrument to
secure the payment of the principal of and interest on
such Future Parity Bonds, and, from and after the date
that the Nonrefunded 1986 Bonds are no longer
outstanding, the Reserve Requirement for any issue of
Future Parity Bonds shall be an amount equal to the least
of 10 percent of the proceeds, Maximum Annual Debt
Service, or 125% of Average Annual Debt Service on that
issue of Future Parity Bonds. The amount payable under
any Reserve Account Instrument shall be credited against
the amount otherwise required to be paid into the Reserve
Account to meet the Reserve Requirement for an issue of
Future Parity Bonds.
For purposes of calculating the Reserve Requirement for the
issuance of Future Parity Bonds bearing interest at a variable
rate, the requirement shall be the lesser of 8 . 5$ per annum and the
highest rate permitted, in the opinion of bond counsel, consistent
with maintaining the tax-exempt status of the interest on the
Outstanding Parity Bonds, the Bonds and the Future Parity Bonds.
0075443.02
-14-
Such amount shall be accumulated within five years of the date of
issuance of the proposed Future Parity Bonds and, to the extent it
is not capitalized from the proceeds of such Future Parity Bonds,
shall be deposited in sixty approximately equal monthly payments
commencing one month after the date of issuance of such Future
Parity Bonds.
"Revenue Fund" shall mean the Sewer Revenue Fund created
and established by Ordinance No. 871 of the City.
"Sewerage System" shall mean the City- s existing combined
sanitary sewerage collection and disposal system and storm and
surface water utility, and any system for garbage and refuse
collection and disposal which hereafter may be combined lawfully
with the existing system, together with all additions thereto and
betterments and extensions thereof at any time made or constructed.
"Term Bond Maturity Year" shall mean any year in which
Term Bonds are scheduled to mature.
"Term Bonds" shall mean the Outstanding Parity Bonds and
any Future Parity Bonds of any single issue or series designated as
Term Bonds in the ordinance authorizing their issuance or sale and
which are subject to mandatory prior redemption or for which
mandatory sinking fund payments are provided.
"ULID" shall mean a utility local improvement district of
the City.
"ULID Assessments" shall mean all assessments levied and
collected in any ULID of the City created for the acquisition or
construction of additions to and extensions of the Sewerage System,
if such assessments are pledged to be paid into the Bond Fund (less
0075"3.02
-15-
any prepaid assessments permitted by law to be paid into a
construction fund or account) . Assessments include any
installments of assessments and any interest or penalties which may
be due thereon.
Section 2 . Findings Regarding Parity Provisions. The City
Council finds and declares that all payments required by Ordinance
No. 2666 pertaining to the 1986 Bonds to have been made into the
Bond Fund have been made into such fund; that no new LLID
Assessments are involved with the issuance of the Bonds; that
provision is made by this ordinance for the payment of the
principal of and interest on the Bonds out of the Bond Fund; that
provision is hereafter made for the deposit and retention in the
Reserve Account of the Bond Fund of the Reserve Requirement for the
Bonds; that prior to the delivery of the Bonds there shall be on
file with the City Clerk -a certificate from a professional engineer
as required by Section 12 of Ordinance No. 2666 ; and that provision
has been made for the payment in full of the principal of and
interest on the Refunded Bonds by the refunding thereof.
Section 3 . Authorization and Description of Bonds. For the
purpose of providing a part of the money required to pay the cost
of carrying out the Improvements and the Refunding Plan and to pay
the costs of issuing the Bonds, the City shall issue the Bonds in
the aggregate principal amount of $ The Bonds shall be
designated Sewerage System Improvement and Refunding Revenue Bonds,
1993 ; shall be dated August 1, 1993 ; shall be in the denominations
of $5, 000 or any integral multiple thereof within a single
maturity; shall be numbered separately in the manner and with any
0075443.02
-16-
additional designation as the Bond Registrar deems necessary for
purpose of identification; and shall bear interest (computed on the
basis of a 360-day year of twelve 30-day months) payable on
November 11 1993 ,. and semiannually thereafter on each succeeding
May 1 and November 1; and shall mature on November 1 in years and
amounts and bear interest at the inter rates per annum as follows:
Maturity Interest
Years Amount Rates
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2013
The new money and refunding portions of the Bonds are allocated to
the various maturities of the Bonds as set forth in Exhibit B
attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. Such
allocation shall be applicable proportionately to each Bond within
a particular maturity of the Bonds, or may hereafter be allocated
by the city within a particular maturity in $5,000 increments of
Bonds selected by lot.
Section 4 . Registration and Transfer of Bonds. The Bonds
shall be issued only in registered form as to both principal and
interest and recorded on the Bond Register. The Bond Register
shall contain the name and mailing address of the owner of each
0075443.02
-17-
Bond and the principal amount and number of each of the Bonds held
by each owner.
Bonds surrendered to the Bond Registrar may be exchanged for
Bonds in any authorized denomination of an equal aggregate
principal amount and of the same interest rate and maturity. Bonds
may be transferred only if endorsed in the manner provided thereon
and surrendered to the Bond Registrar. Any exchange or transfer
shall be without cost to the owner or transferee. The Bond
Registrar shall not be obligated to exchange or transfer any Bond
during the 15 days preceding any principal payment date.
Section 5 . Payment of Bonds. Both principal of and interest
on the Bonds shall be payable in lawful money of the United States
of America. Interest on the Bonds shall be paid by checks or
drafts of the Bond Registrar mailed on the interest payment date to
the registered owners at the addresses appearing on the Bond
Register on the 15th day of the month preceding the interest
payment date. Principal of the Bonds shall be payable upon
presentation and surrender of the Bonds by the registered owners at
either of the principal offices of the Bond Registrar at the option
of the owners. The Bonds shall be payable solely out of the Bond
Fund and shall not be general obligations of the City.
Section 6. Optional and Mandatory Redemption and open Market
Purchase of Bonds. Bonds maturing in the years 1993 through 2002 ,
inclusive, shall be issued without the right or option of the City
to redeem the same prior to their stated maturity dates. The City
reserves the right and option to redeem the Bonds maturing on and
after November 1, 2003 , as a whole, or in part from maturities
OR75443.02
-18-
selected by the City (and by lot within a maturity in such manner
as the Bond Registrar shall determine) , on November 1, 2002 , and on
any interest payment date thereafter, at par plus accrued interest
to the date of redemption.
Bonds maturing in 2013 are Term Bonds and, if not redeemed
under the optional redemption provisions set forth above or
purchased in the open market under the provisions set forth below,
shall be called for redemption by lot (in such manner as the Bond
Registrar shall determine) at par plus accrued interest on
November 1 in years and amounts as follows:
Mandatory Mandatory
Redemption Redemption
Years Amounts
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013 (maturity)
In the event that the City shall redeem Term Bonds under the
optional redemption provisions set forth above or purchase Term
Bonds in the open market as set forth below, the Term Bonds so
redeemed or purchased (irrespective of their redemption or purchase
price) shall be credited at the par amount thereof against [the
next mandatory redemption requirement for those Term Bonds which is
at least 60 days after the date of that redemption or
purchase] [last scheduled mandatory redemption amount] .
Portions of the principal amount of any Bond, in installments
of $5, 000 or any integral multiple thereof, may be redeemed. If
less than all of the principal amount of any Bond is redeemed, upon
0075443.02
-19-
surrender of such Bond at the principal office of the Bond
Registrar, there shall be issued to the registered owner, without
charge therefor, a new Bond (or Bonds, at the option of the
registered owner) . of like maturity and interest rate in any of the
denominations authorized by this ordinance in the aggregate total
principal amount remaining unredeemed.
The City further reserves the right and option to purchase any
or all of the Bonds in the open market at any time at any price,
plus accrued interest to the date of such purchase.
All Bonds purchased or redeemed under this section shall be
cancelled.
Section 7 . Notice of Redemption. The City shall cause notice
of any intended redemption of Bonds to be given not less than 30
nor more than 60 days prior to the date fixed for redemption by
first-class mail, postage prepaid, to the registered owner of any
Bond to be redeemed at the address appearing on the Bond Register
at the time the Bond Registrar prepares the notice, and the
requirements of this sentence shall be deemed to have been
fulfilled when notice has been mailed as so provided, whether or
not it is actually received by the owner of any Bond. Interest on
Bonds called for redemption shall cease to accrue on the date fixed
for redemption unless the Bond or Bonds called are not redeemed
when presented pursuant to the call. In addition, the redemption
notice shall be mailed within the same period, postage prepaid, to
Moody's Investors Service, Inc. , and Standard & Poor's Corporation
at their offices in New York, New York, or their successors, to
Lehman Brothers at its principal office in Seattle, Washington, or
0075443.02
-20-
its successor, and to such other person and with such additional
information as the City Finance Director shall determine, but these
additional mailings shall not be a condition precedent to the
redemption of Bonds.
Section 8. Failure to Redeem Bonds. If any Bond is not
redeemed when properly presented at its maturity or call date, the
City shall be obligated to pay interest on that Bond at the same
rate provided in the Bond from and after its maturity or call date
until that Bond, both principal and interest, is paid in full or
until sufficient money for its payment in full is on deposit in the
Bond Fund and the Bond has been called for payment by giving notice
of that call to the registered owner of that unpaid Bond.
Section 9. Payments into Bond Fund. The Bond Fund was
created by Ordinance No. 2666 and has been divided into three
accounts, namely, a Principal and Interest Account, an Assessment
Account and a Reserve Account. So long as any Outstanding Parity
Bonds, Bonds. or Future Parity Bonds are outstanding against the
Bond Fund, the City obligates and binds itself to set aside and pay
into the Bond Fund all ULID Assessments upon their collection and,
on or before the 20th day of each month, out of the Net Revenue of
the Sewerage System, in addition to the amounts required to be paid
and retained therein for the Outstanding Parity Bonds, certain
fixed amounts without regard to any fixed proportion, namely:
(a) Into the Principal and Interest Account,
beginning with the month of September, 1993 , at least an
amount which, together with ULID Assessments and other
money on deposit therein, will equal 1/2 of the amount of
principal and interest to become due and payable on the
Bonds on November 1, 1993 , and, commencing with the month
of November, 1993 , and thereafter, at least an amount
which, together with ULID Assessments and other money on
0075443.02
-21-
deposit therein, will equal 1/6 of the next ensuing
requirements for interest and 1/12 of the principal to
become due and payable on the next principal payment date
on all of the Bonds then outstanding, on or before each
interest or principal and interest payment date of Future
Parity Bonds, at least an amount which, together with
ULID Assessments and other money on deposit therein, will
be sufficient to pay the interest or principal and
interest to become due and payable on Future Parity Bonds
outstanding on that next payment date, including any
Future Parity Bonds subject to mandatory redemption on
that date;
(b) Into the Assessment Account, all ULID
Assessments deposited into the Bond Fund in excess of the
amount of money deposited in the Principal and Interest
Account required to pay principal of and interest on
Outstanding Parity Bonds, Bonds and Future Parity Bonds,
and to be used for the purposes set forth below in this
section; and
(c) Into the Reserve Account, from the proceeds of
the Bonds and from money on deposit therein allocable to
the Refunded Bonds, an amount necessary to fund the
Reserve Requirement for the Bonds and, for Future Parity
Bonds, an amount necessary to fund the Reserve
Requirement within the time permitted by Ordinance No.
2666. For the Bonds, the Reserve Requirement shall be
fully funded by proceeds from the issuance and sale of
the Bonds and from money on deposit in the Reserve
Account allocable to the Refunded Bonds.
The City covenants and agrees that it will at all times
maintain in the Reserve Account an amount equal to the Reserve
Requirement, except for withdrawals therefrom as authorized herein,
at all times so long as any bonds payable from the Bond Fund are
outstanding. When the total amount in the Bond Fund shall equal
the total amount of principal and interest for all outstanding
bonds payable out of the Bond Fund to the last maturity thereof, no
further payment need be made into the Bond Fund.
In the event that there shall be a deficiency in the Principal
and Interest Account to meet maturing installments of either
principal or interest, as the case may be, to pay required
0075443.02
-22-
redemptions of the outstanding Parity Bonds, Bonds or Future Parity
Bonds, or to meet sinking fund requirements, such deficiency shall
be made up from the Reserve Account by the withdrawal of cash
therefrom for that purpose to the extent such deficiency is not
made up from the Assessment Account. Any deficiency created in the
Reserve Account by reason of any such withdrawals shall then be
made up from the Net Revenue of the Sewerage System first available
after making necessary provisions for the required payments into
the Principal and Interest Account. The Reserve Requirement in the
Reserve Account shall otherwise be held intact and may be applied
against the last outstanding bonds payable out of the Bond Fund.
The City may provide for the purchase, redemption or
defeasance of bonds payable from the Bond Fund by the use of money
on deposit in any account in the Bond Fund as long as the money
remaining in those accounts is sufficient to satisfy the required
deposits in those accounts for the remaining bonds outstanding
payable from the Bond Fund.
Money in the Assessment Account shall be used with other
available money to pay and redeem outstanding Parity Bonds, Bonds
and Future Parity Bonds called for redemption prior to their
maturity, or, if insufficient money is deposited in the Principal
and Interest Account, then for deposit into that account to meet
the required payments therefrom.
All money in the Bond Fund may be kept in cash or invested in
Permitted Investments maturing not later than the date when the
funds are required for the payment of principal of or interest on
the outstanding bonds payable from the Bond Fund (for investments
0075443.02
-23-
in the Principal and Interest Account) or having a guaranteed
redemption price prior to maturity or maturing not later than
twelve years from the date of the investment and, in no event,
maturing later than the last maturity of any remaining outstanding
bonds payable from the Bond Fund, whichever is the lesser (for
investments in the Reserve Account) . Income from investments in
the Principal and Interest Account shall be deposited in that
account. Income from investments in the Assessment Account shall
be deposited Assessment Account. Income from investments in the
Reserve Account shall be deposited in that account until the amount
therein is equal to the Reserve Requirements of all bonds payable
from the Bond Fund, and thereafter shall be deposited in the
Principal and Interest Account.
Notwithstanding the provisions for the deposit of earnings,
any earnings which are , subject to a federal tax or rebate
requirement may be withdrawn from the Bond Fund for deposit into a
separate fund or account for that purpose.
In no event shall any money in the Bond Fund or any other
money reasonably expected to be used to pay principal of or
interest on the Bonds be invested at a yield which would cause the
Bonds to be arbitrage bonds within the meaning of Section 148 of
the Code.
In addition, the City reserves the right to substitute for all
or for a portion of the Reserve Account a Reserve Account
Instrument which, when combined with any money or investments in
the Reserve Account, equals an amount not less than the Reserve
Requirement for all outstanding outstanding Parity Bonds, Bonds and
0075443.02
-24-
Future Parity Bonds. The City covenants that, until the date that
the Nonrefunded 1986 Bonds are no longer outstanding, any such
substitution will be subject to the prior approval by any provider
of bond insurance. for any then outstanding Future Parity Bonds and
written certificates from Moody's Investors Service, Inc. , and
Standard & Poor's Corporation that such substitution will not
result in any change in the outstanding ratings of the Outstanding
Parity Bonds, the Bonds and any Future Parity Bonds and will not
impair the security thereof.
The City may create sinking fund accounts or other accounts in
the Bond Fund for the payment or securing the payment of bonds
payable from the Bond Fund as long as the maintenance of such
accounts does not conflict with the rights of the owners of bonds
payable from the Bond Fund.
If the City fails to set aside and pay into the Bond Fund the
amounts set forth above, the owner of any of the outstanding bonds
payable out of the Bond Fund may bring action against the City and
compel the setting aside and payment.
Section 10. Pledge of Revenue and Lien Position. The Gross
Revenue of the Sewerage System and ULID Assessments are pledged
irrevocably to the payments required by this ordinance, and the
Outstanding Parity Bonds, Bonds and Future Parity Bonds, if any,
shall constitute a charge or lien upon such Gross Revenue prior and
superior to any other charges whatsoever, except Operating and
Maintenance Expenses, and upon such ULID Assessments prior and
superior to any other charges whatsoever.
0075443.02
-25-
Section 11. Sufficiency of Gross Revenue. In the judgment of
the City Council, the Gross Revenue of the Sewerage System at the
rates to be charged for surface drainage and sewerage service will
be more than sufficient to meet all Operating and Maintenance
Expenses and debt service requirements on the Outstanding Parity
Bonds and to permit the setting aside into the Bond Fund out of the
Gross Revenue of the Sewerage System of amounts sufficient to pay
the interest on the Bonds as such interest becomes payable and to
pay and redeem all of the Bonds at maturity or earlier mandatory
redemption dates. The City Council and corporate authorities of
the City further declare that in fixing the amounts to be paid into
the Bond Fund as aforesaid they have exercised due regard for the
Operating and Maintenance Expenses, and the City has not bound and
obligated itself to set aside and pay into the Bond Fund a greater
amount or proportion of- the Gross Revenue of the Sewerage System
than in the judgment of the City Council will be available over and
above such Operating and Maintenance Expenses and that no portion
of the Gross Revenue of the Sewerage System previously has been
pledged for any indebtedness other than the Outstanding Parity
Bonds.
Section 12 . Form and Execution of Bonds. The Bonds shall be
printed or lithographed on good bond paper in a form consistent
with the provisions of this ordinance and state law, shall be
signed by the Mayor and City Clerk, either or both of whose
signatures shall be manual or facsimile, and the seal of the City
or a facsimile reproduction thereof shall be impressed or printed
thereon.
0075443.02
-26-
Only Bonds bearing a Certificate of Authentication in the
following form, manually signed by the Bond Registrar, shall be
valid or obligatory for any purpose or entitled to the benefits of
this ordinance:
CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION
This bond is one of the fully registered City of
Kent, Washington, Sewerage System Improvement and
Refunding Revenue Bonds, 1993 , described in the Bond
ordinance.
WASHINGTON STATE FISCAL AGENCY
Bond Registrar
By
Authorized Signer
The authorized signing of a Certificate of Authentication shall be
conclusive evidence that the Bonds so authenticated have been duly
executed, authenticated and delivered and are entitled to the
benefits of this ordinance.
If any officer whose facsimile signature appears on the Bonds
ceases to be an officer of the City authorized to sign bonds before
the Bonds bearing his or her facsimile signature are authenticated
or delivered by the Bond Registrar or issued by the City, those
Bonds nevertheless may be authenticated, delivered and issued and,
when authenticated, issued and delivered, shall be as binding on
the City as though that person had continued to be an officer of
the City authorized to sign bonds. Any Bond also may be signed on
behalf of the City by any person who, on the actual date of signing
of the Bond, is an officer of the City authorized to sign bonds,
although he or she did not hold the required office on the date of
issuance of the Bonds.
0075443.02
-27-
Section 13 . Bond Registrar. The Bond Registrar shall keep,
or cause to be kept, at its principal corporate trust office,
sufficient books for the registration and transfer of the Bonds
which shall be open to inspection by the City at all times. The
Bond Registrar is authorized, on behalf of the City, to
authenticate and deliver Bonds transferred or exchanged in
accordance with the provisions of the Bonds and this ordinance, to
serve as the City's paying agent for the Bonds and to carry out all
of the Bond Registrar's powers and duties under this ordinance and
City Ordinance No. 2418 establishing a system of registration for
the City's bonds and obligations.
The Bond Registrar shall be responsible for its representa-
tions contained in the Bond Registrar's Certificate of
Authentication on the Bonds. The Bond Registrar may become the
owner of Bonds with the same rights it would have if it were not
the Bond Registrar and, to the extent permitted by law, may act as
depository for and permit any of its officers or directors to act
as members of, or in any other capacity with respect to, any
committee formed to protect the rights of Bond owners.
Section 14 . Construction Fund. The Construction Fund is
created in the office of the City Finance Director to be known as
the Construction Fund, 1993 , into which fund shall be
deposited approximately $ of principal proceeds of the
Bonds and out of which fund shall be paid the costs of carrying out
the Improvements. The City may use any money remaining in the
Construction Fund after the payment of all such costs to carry out
any other capital improvements to the Sewerage System. Bond
0075443.02
-28-
proceeds deposited in the Construction Fund may be invested
temporarily in any legal investment, and the investment earnings
may be retained in the Construction Fund and used for the purpose
of that fund.
Section 15. Disposition and Use of Bond Proceeds. The
accrued interest, if any, received from the sale of the Bonds shall
be paid into the Principal and Interest Account and used to pay
interest on the Bonds on their first interest payment date.
Principal proceeds of the Bonds shall be deposited in the
Construction Fund in accordance with Section 14 . The remaining
principal proceeds of the Bonds shall be deposited and used in
accordance with the provisions of Section 16 of this ordinance.
Section 16. Refunding of the Refunded Bonds.
(a) Appointment of Refunding Trustee.
Bank is appointed the Refunding Trustee.
(b) Acquisition of Acquired obligations. Immediately upon
the receipt of the proceeds of the sale of the Bonds, the City
shall deposit with the Refunding Trustee, together with other money
of the City, if necessary, an amount sufficient to discharge the
obligation of the City relating to the Refunded Bonds under
Ordinance No. 2666 by providing for the payment of the amounts
required to be paid by the Refunding Plan. To the extent
practicable, such obligations shall be discharged fully by the
Refunding Trustee's simultaneous purchase of the Acquired
Obligations, bearing such interest and maturing as to principal and
interest in such amounts and at such times so as to provide,
together with a beginning cash balance of $ (which amount may
0075443.02
-29-
be increased or decreased) , for the payment of the amounts required
to be paid by the Refunding Plan. The Acquired Obligations are
listed and more particularly described in Schedule A attached to
the Refunding Trust Agreement between the City and the Refunding
Trustee, but are subject to substitution as set forth below.
(c) Substitution of Acquired Obligations. Prior to the
purchase of any such Acquired Obligations, the City reserves the
right to substitute other direct, noncallable Government
Obligations for any of the Acquired Obligations and to use any
savings created thereby for any lawful City purpose if, (a) in the
opinion of Foster Pepper & Shefelman, the City's bond counsel, the
interest on the Bonds will remain excluded from gross income for
federal income tax purposes under Sections 103 , 148 and 149 (d) of
the Code, and (b) such substitution shall not impair the timely
payment of the amounts required to be paid by the Refunding Plan,
so verified by a nationally recognized firm of certified public
accountants.
After the purchase of the Acquired Obligations by the
Refunding Trustee, the City reserves the right to substitute
therefor cash or Government Obligations subject to the conditions
that such money or securities held by the Refunding Trustee shall
be sufficient to carry out the Refunding Plan, that such
substitution will not cause the Bonds to be arbitrage bonds within
the meaning of Section 148 of the Code and regulations thereunder
in effect on the date of such substitution and applicable to
obligations issued on the issue date of the Bonds, and that the
City obtain, at its expense: (1) verification by a nationally
0075443.02
-30-
recognized firm of certified public accountants acceptable to the
Refunding Trustee confirming that the payments of principal of and
interest on the substitute Acquired obligations, if paid when due,
and any other mtoney held by the Refunding Trustee will be
sufficient to carry out the Refunding Plan; and (2) an opinion from
Foster Pepper & Shefelman, bond counsel to the City, its successor,
or other nationally recognized bond counsel to the City, to the
effect that the disposition and substitution or purchase of such
securities, under the statutes, rules and regulations then in force
and applicable to the Bonds, will not cause the interest on the
Bonds or the Refunded Bonds to be included in gross income for
federal income tax purposes and that such disposition and
substitution or purchase is in compliance with the statutes and
regulations applicable to the Bonds. Any surplus money resulting
from the sale, transfer, other disposition or redemption of the
Acquired obligations and the substitutions therefor shall be
released from the trust estate and transferred to the City to be
used for any lawful City purpose.
(d) Administration -of Refunding Plan. The Refunding Trustee
is authorized and directed to purchase the Acquired Obligations (or
substitute obligations) and to make the payments required to be
made by the Refunding Plan from the Acquired Obligations (or
substitute obligations) and money deposited with the Refunding
Trustee pursuant to this ordinance. All Acquired Obligations (or
substitute obligations) and the money deposited with the Refunding
Trustee and any income therefrom shall be held irrevocably,
invested and applied in accordance with the provisions of Ordinance
0075443.02
-31-
No. 2666, this ordinance, Chapter 39 . 53 RCW and other applicable
statutes of the State of Washington, and the Refunding Trust
Agreement. All necessary and proper fees, compensation and
expenses of the Refunding Trustee for the Bonds and all other costs
incidental to establishing the escrow to accomplish the refunding
of the Refunded Bonds and costs related to the issuance and
delivery of the Bonds, including bond printing, rating service
fees, insurance premiums, verification fees, bond counsel's fees
and other related expenses, shall be paid out of the proceeds of
the Bonds.
(e) Authorization for Refunding Trust Agreement. To carry
out the Refunding Plan provided for by this ordinance, the Mayor or
Finance Director is authorized and directed to execute and deliver
to the Refunding Trustee a Refunding Trust Agreement substantially
in the form on file with the City Clerk and by this reference made
a part hereof, setting forth the duties, obligations and
responsibilities of the Refunding Trustee in connection with the
payment, redemption and retirement of the Refunded Bonds as
provided herein and stating that the provisions for payment of the
fees, compensation and expenses of the Refunding Trustee set forth
therein are satisfactory to it. Prior to executing the Refunding
Trust Agreement, the Mayor or Finance Director is authorized to
make changes therein that do not change the substance and purpose
thereof or which assure that the escrow provided therein and the
Bonds are in compliance with the requirements of federal law
governing the exclusion of interest on the Bonds from gross income
for federal income tax purposes.
0075443.02
-32-
Section 17 . Call for Redemption of the Refunded Bonds. The
City calls for redemption on November 1, 1996, all of the Refunded
Bonds at par plus accrued interest. Such call for redemption shall
be irrevocable after the delivery of the Bonds to the initial
purchaser thereof. The date on which the Refunded Bonds are called
for redemption is the earliest date on which those Refunded Bonds
may be called for redemption.
The proper City officials are authorized and directed to cause
the fiscal agencies to give such notice as required, at the times
and in the manner required by Ordinance No. 2666 to effect the
redemption prior to their maturities of the Refunded Bonds.
Section 18 . City Findings with Respect to Refunding. The
City Council finds and determines that the issuance and sale of the
Bonds at this time will effect a savings to the City and its
ratepayers and is in the best interest of the City and in the
public interest. In making-such finding and determination, the
City Council has given consideration to the fixed maturities of the
Bonds and the Refunded Bonds, the costs of issuance of the Bonds
and the known earned income from the investment of the proceeds of
the issuance and sale of the Bonds and other money of the City used
in the Refunding Plan pending payment and redemption of the
Refunded Bonds.
The City Council further finds and determines that the money
to be deposited with the Refunding Trustee for the Refunded Bonds
in accordance with Section 16 of this ordinance, together with
known earned income from the investments thereof, will be
sufficient to carry out the Refunding Plan and discharge and
0075443.02
-33-
satisfy the obligations of the City under Ordinance No. 2666 with
respect to the Refunded Bonds and the pledges, charges, trusts,
covenants and agreements of the City therein made or provided for
as to the Refunded Bonds and that the Refunded Bonds shall no
longer be deemed to be outstanding under such ordinance immediately
upon the deposit of such money with the Refunding Trustee.
Section 19. Covenants. The City covenants and agrees with
the owner of each Bond at any time outstanding, as follows:
(a) ULID Assessments. All ULID Assessments shall
be paid into the Bond Fund and may be used to pay the
principal of and interest on the Outstanding Parity
Bonds, Bonds and Future Parity Bonds without those
Assessments being particularly allocated to the payment
of the principal of and interest on any particular issue
of bonds. Nothing in this ordinance or this section
shall be construed to prohibit the City from issuing
sewerage revenue bonds having a subordinate lien to the
Outstanding Parity Bonds and the Bonds and pledging as
security for their payment assessments levied in any
ULIDs which may have been specifically created to pay
part of the cost of, improvements to the Sewerage System
for which those subordinate lien bonds were specifically
issued.
(b) Rates and Charges. It will establish, maintain
and collect each year such rates and charges for drainage
and sewerage service (and for garbage and refuse
collection and disposal service should any system for
such service ever be combined with the Sewerage System)
and shall adjust such rates and charges from time to time
so that there will be made available for the payment of
the principal of and interest on the Outstanding Parity
Bonds, the Bonds and any Future Parity Bonds Net Revenue
of the Sewerage System, together with the collection of
ULID Assessments, in an amount equal to the Coverage
Requirement.
(c) Good Repair. It will at all times maintain and
keep the Sewerage System and all additions thereto and
betterments, replacements and extensions thereof in good
repair, working order and condition and also will at all
times operate the Sewerage System and the business in
connection therewith in an efficient manner and at a
reasonable cost.
0075443.02
-34-
(d) Limitation on Sale of Property. It will not
sell, lease, mortgage, or in any manner encumber or
dispose of all of the property of the Sewerage System
unless provision is made for payment into the Bond Fund
of an amount sufficient to pay the principal of and
interest on all outstanding Parity Bonds, Bonds and
Future Parity Bonds at that time outstanding, and it will
not sell, lease, mortgage, or in any manner encumber or
dispose of any part of the property of the Sewerage
System that is used, useful and material to the operation
thereof, unless provision is made for replacement thereof
or for payment into the Bond Fund of the total amount of
revenue of the Sewerage System received, which shall not
be less than an amount which shall bear the same ratio to
the amount of outstanding Outstanding Parity Bonds, Bonds
and Future Parity Bonds as the Gross Revenue of the
Sewerage System available for debt service for those
outstanding bonds for the twelve months preceding such
sale, lease, mortgage, encumbrance or disposal from the
portion of the Sewerage System sold, leased, mortgaged,
encumbered or disposed of bears to the Gross Revenue of
the Sewerage System available for debt service for such
bonds from the entire Sewerage System for the same
period. Any money so paid into the Bond Fund shall be
used to retire all or part of such outstanding bonds not
later than the earliest par call date.
(e) Accounts and Records. It will, while any of
the Bonds remain outstanding, keep proper and separate
accounts and records in which complete and separate
entries shall be made of all transactions relating to its
Sewerage System and it . will furnish to the owner or
owners thereof at the written request of such owner or
owners, complete operating and income statements of the
Sewerage System in reasonable detail covering any
calendar year not more than ninety days after the close
of such calendar year. It will grant any owner or owners
of at least twenty-five percent of the outstanding Bonds
the right at all reasonable times to inspect the Sewerage
System and all records, accounts and data of the City
relating thereto. Upon the request of any owner of any
of the Bonds, it will furnish to such owner a copy of the
most recently completed audit of the City's accounts by
the State Auditor of Washington, or such other audit as
is authorized by law in lieu thereof.
(f) No Free Service• Enforcement of Accounts and
ULID Assessments. It will not furnish any service of the
Sewerage System (or any garbage and refuse collection and
disposal service should any system for such service ever
be combined with the Sewerage System) to any customer
whatsoever free of charge, and it will promptly take
legal action to enforce the collection of all delinquent
accounts. In addition, if on the date specified by law
W75443.QZ
-35-
and in ordinances of the City in any year two
installments of any ULID Assessments have been delinquent
for more than one year, the City shall proceed with the
foreclosure of the delinquent assessments or delinquent
installments thereof in the manner required by law and
ordinances of the City.
(g) Self-Insurance and Insurance. It either will
at all times self-insure in such manner and to such
extent as the City shall determine to be necessary and
appropriate or, to the extent insurance coverage is
available at reasonable cost with responsible insurers,
will carry fire and such other forms of insurance on such
of the buildings, equipment, facilities and properties of
the Sewerage System as under good practice are ordinarily
carried on such buildings, equipment, facilities and
properties by utilities engaged in the operation of
drainage and sewerage systems to the full insurable value
thereof, and also will carry adequate public liability
insurance (and, until the date that the Nonrefunded 1986
Bonds are no longer outstanding, war risk insurance if
available at reasonable rates) at all times. The
premiums on such insurance policies are declared to be a
normal part of Operating and Maintenance Expenses.
(h) Payment of Obligations. It will pay all
Operating and Maintenance Expenses and the debt service
requirements for all outstanding Outstanding Parity
Bonds, Bonds and Future Parity Bonds and otherwise will
meet the obligations of the City as set forth in this
ordinance.
(i) Limitation on Substantial Reduction of Gross
Revenue. It will not change any rate or charge for
Sewerage System service as now established by the
existing rate ordinance or ordinances of the City that
will substantially reduce the annual Gross Revenue of the
Sewerage System below that which would have been obtained
before such change unless the City shall have on file a
certificate from a licensed professional engineer
experienced in the design, construction and operation of
municipal utilities, stating the rates and charges as so
changed will provide Gross Revenue of the Sewerage
System, together with ULID Assessments, sufficient to
comply with all the covenants and requirements of this
ordinance, including the Coverage Requirement.
(j) Preservation of Tax Exemption for Interest on
Bonds. It will take all actions necessary to prevent
interest on the Bonds from being included in gross income
for federal income tax purposes, and it will neither take
any action nor make or permit any use of proceeds of the
Bonds or other funds of the City treated as proceeds of
the Bonds at any time during the term of the Bonds which
0075443.02
-3 6-
will cause interest on the Bonds to be included in gross
income for federal income tax purposes. The City also
covenants that it will, to the extent arbitrage rebate
requirements of Section 148 of the Code are applicable to
the Bonds, take all actions necessary to comply (or to be
treated as having complied) with those requirements in
connection with the Bonds, including the calculation and
payment of any penalties that the City has elected to pay
as an alternative to calculating rebatable arbitrage, and
the payment of any other penalties if required under
Section 148 of the Code to prevent interest on the Bonds
from being included in gross income for federal income
tax purposes.
The City further certifies that it has not been notified of
any listing or proposed listing by the Internal Revenue Service to
the effect that it is a bond issuer whose arbitrage certifications
may not be relied upon.
Section 20. Future Parity Bonds. The City covenants and
agrees with the owner of each Bond at any time outstanding that it
will not issue any Future Parity Bonds unless it first shall
satisfy the conditions set forth in Section 12 of Ordinance No.
2666, which section is by reference incorporated herein and made a
part hereof and shall be applicable to the Bonds so long as any of
the same are outstanding.
Nothing contained in the provisions for Future Parity Bonds
shall prevent the City from issuing revenue bonds having a
subordinate lien on the Gross Revenue of the Sewerage System or
from pledging the payment of assessments in any ULID (the
assessments in which are not pledged into the Bond Fund) into a
bond redemption fund or account created to pay and secure the
payment of the principal of and interest on such subordinate lien
bonds as long as such assessments are levied to pay part or all of
0075443.02
-37-
the cost of improvements being constructed out of the proceeds of
the sale of such subordinate lien bonds.
Section 21. Priority of Payments. All ULID Assessments shall
be paid into the .Bond Fund as provided by Section 9 . The Gross
Revenue of the Sewerage System, except for earnings in the Bond
Fund and funds other than the Revenue Fund, shall be credited to
the Revenue Fund of the City as it is collected. Such Fund shall
be held separate and apart from other funds and accounts of the
City. Money in the Revenue Fund shall be used for the following
purposes only and shall be applied in the following order of
priority:
(a) To pay the necessary Operating and Maintenance
Expenses;
(b) To make all required payments into the
Principal and Interest Account in the Bond Fund for all
bonds payable out of the Bond Fund, including all
payments required to be made for the payment of any Term
Bonds, including all mandatory redemption payments
required to be made;
(c) To make all required payments into the Reserve
Account and other accounts hereafter created in the Bond
Fund into which the Net Revenue of the Sewerage System is
to be deposited;
(d) To make all payments required to be made
pursuant to a reimbursement agreement in connection with
a Reserve Account Instrument, except that if there is not
sufficient money to make all payments under reimbursement
agreements the payments will be made on a pro rata basis;
(e) To make all required payments into the bond
redemption funds or reserve account for any junior lien
Sewerage System revenue bonds or short-term obligations
hereafter issued;
(f) To make necessary additions, betterments and
improvements and repairs to or extensions and
replacements of the Sewerage System, or for any other
proper purposes connected with the operation of the
Sewerage System for which such money may be lawfully
used; and
0075443.02
-38-
(g) To retire by redemption or to purchase in the
open market at a price not in excess of the redemption
price on the then or next applicable call date
outstanding Sewerage System revenue bonds or other
Sewerage System revenue obligations of the City then
outstanding.
The City may transfer from any funds or accounts of the City
legally available therefor, except bond redemption funds, refunding
escrow funds or defeasance funds, any money therein to meet the
required payments to be made into the Bond Fund.
Section 22 . Bonds Negotiable. The Bonds shall be negotiable
instruments to the extent provided by RCW 62A.8-102 and 62A. 8-105 .
Section 23 . Refunding or Defeasance of Bonds. The City may
issue refunding bonds pursuant to the laws of the State of
Washington and use money available from any other lawful source to
pay the principal of and interest on the Bonds, or such portion
thereof included in a refunding or defeasance plan, as the same
become due and payable and'to redeem and retire, release, refund or
defease all such then-outstanding Bonds (hereinafter collectively
called the "defeased Bonds") and to pay the costs of such refunding
or defeasance. In the event that money and/or Government
Obligations, or other legal investments sufficient in amount,
together with known earned income from the investments thereof, to
redeem and retire, release, refund or defease the defeased Bonds in
accordance with their terms, are set aside irrevocably in a special
fund for and pledged irrevocably to such redemption, retirement or
defeasance (hereinafter called the "trust account") , then all right
and interest of the owners of the defeased Bonds in the covenants
of this ordinance and, except as hereinafter provided, in the Gross
Revenue of the Sewerage System, ULID Assessments, funds and
0075443.02
-39-
accounts obligated to the payment of such defeased Bonds, other
than the right to receive the funds so set aside and pledged,
thereafter shall cease and become void. Such owners thereafter
shall have the right to receive payment of the principal of and
interest on the defeased Bonds from the trust account and, in the
event the funds in the trust account are not available for such
payment, shall have the residual right to receive payment of the
principal of and interest on the defeased Bonds from the Gross
Revenue of the Sewerage System and ULID Assessments without any
priority of lien or charge against that revenue, assessments or
covenants with respect thereto except to be paid therefrom.
After the establishing and full funding of such trust account,
the City then may apply any money in any other fund or account
established for the payment or redemption of the defeased Bonds to
any lawful purposes as- it shall determine, subject only to the
rights of the owners of any other Bonds or bonds then outstanding.
In the event that the refunding plan provides that the
defeased Bonds or the refunding bonds to be issued be secured by
cash and/or Government Obligations or other legal investments
pending the prior redemption of the defeased Bonds and if such
refunding plan also provides that certain cash and/or Government
Obligations or other legal investments are pledged irrevocably for
the prior redemption of the defeased Bonds included in that
refunding plan, then only the debt service on the Bonds which are
not defeased Bonds and the refunding bonds, the payment of which is
not so secured by the refunding plan, shall be included in the
computation of the Coverage Requirement for the issuance of Future
0075443.02
-40-
Parity Bonds and the annual computation of coverage for determining
compliance with the rate covenants.
Section 24 . Approval of Bond Purchase Contract. Lehman
Brothers of Seattle, Washington, has presented a purchase contract
dated , 1993 (the "Bond Purchase Contract") , to the City
offering to purchase the Bonds under the terms and conditions
provided in the Bond Purchase Contract, which written Bond Purchase
Contract is on file with the City Clerk and is incorporated herein
by this reference. The City Council finds that entering into the
Bond Purchase Contract is in the City's best interest and therefore
accepts the offer contained therein and authorizes its execution by
City officials.
The Bonds will be printed at City expense and will be
delivered to the purchaser in accordance with the Bond Purchase
Contract, with the approving legal opinion of Foster Pepper &
Shefelman, municipal bond counsel of Seattle, Washington, regarding
the Bonds printed on each Bond. Except as provided in the Bond
Purchase Contract, bond counsel shall not be required to review and
shall express no opinion concerning the completeness or accuracy of
any official statement, offering circular or other sales material
issued or used in connection with the Bonds, and bond counsel's
opinion shall so state.
The proper City officials are authorized and directed to do
everything necessary, including reviewing and executing the final
official statement, for the prompt delivery of the Bonds to the
purchaser and for the proper application and use of the proceeds of
the sale thereof.
0075433.02
-41-
Section 25. Preliminary Official Statement Deemed "Final" .
The City Council has been provided with copies of a preliminary
official statement dated 1993 (the "Preliminary
Official Statement") , prepared in connection with the sale of the
Bonds. For the sole purpose of the purchaser's compliance with
Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 15c2-12 (b) (1) , the City
"deems final" that Preliminary Official Statement as of its date,
except for the omission of information as to offering prices,
interest rates, selling compensation, aggregate principal amount,
principal amount per maturity, maturity dates, options of
redemption, delivery dates, ratings, and other terms of the Bonds
dependent on such matters.
Section 26. Temporary Bond. Pending the printing, execution
and delivery to the purchaser of the definitive Bonds, the City may
cause to be executed and delivered to such purchaser a single
temporary Bond in the total principal amount of the Bonds. Such
temporary Bond shall bear the same date of issuance, interest
rates, principal payment dates and terms and covenants as the
definitive Bonds, and shall be issued as a fully registered Bond in
the name of the purchaser, and shall be in a form acceptable to the
purchaser. The temporary Bond shall be exchanged for the
definitive Bonds as soon as they are printed, executed and
available for delivery.
Section 27 . Amendatory and Supplemental Ordinances.
27 . 1 Provisions Exclusive. This ordinance shall not be
modified or amended in any respect subsequent to the initial
W7W3.02
-42-
issuance of the Bonds, except as provided in and in accordance with
and subject to the provisions of this section.
27. 2 Amendments Without Consent of Bondowners. The City
may from time to time, and at any time, without the consent of or
notice to the registered owners of the Bonds, pass supplemental or
amendatory ordinances as follows:
(a) To cure any formal defect, omission,
inconsistency or ambiguity in this ordinance in a manner
not adverse to the owner of any outstanding Parity Bonds,
Bonds or Future Parity Bonds;
(b) To impose upon the Bond Registrar (with
its consent) for the benefit of the registered owners of
the Bonds any additional rights, remedies, powers,
authority, security, liabilities or duties which may
lawfully be granted, conferred or imposed and which are
not contrary to or inconsistent with this ordinance as
theretofore in effect;
(c) To add to the covenants and agreements of,
and limitations and restrictions upon, the City in this
ordinance, other covenants, agreements, limitations and
restrictions to be observed by the City which are not
contrary or inconsistent with this ordinance as
theretofore in effect;
(d) To confirm, as further assurance, any
pledge under, and the subjection to any claim, lien or
pledge created or to be created by this ordinance of any
other money, securities or funds;
(e) To authorize different denominations of
the Bonds and to make correlative amendments and
modifications to this ordinance regarding exchangeability
of Bonds of different authorized denominations,
redemptions of portions of Bonds of particular authorized
denominations and similar amendments and modifications of
a technical nature;
(f) To modify, alter, amend or supplement this
ordinance in any other respect which is not materially
adverse to the registered owners of the Bonds and which
does not involve a change described in subsection 27. 3 of
this section; and
(g) To maintain, because of change in federal
law or rulings, the exemption of the interest on the
Bonds from federal income taxation.
0075443.02
-43-
Before the City shall enact any such supplemental ordinance
pursuant to this subsection, there shall have been delivered to the
City and the Bond Registrar an opinion of bond counsel to the City,
stating that such.supplementa1 ordinance is authorized or permitted
by this ordinance and will, upon the execution and delivery
thereof, be valid and binding upon the City in accordance with its
terms and will not adversely affect the exemption from federal
income taxation of interest on the Bonds.
27 .3 Amendments With Consent of Bondowners.
(a) Except for any supplemental ordinance entered
into pursuant to subsection 27 .2 of this section, subject to the
terms and provisions contained in this subsection 27 . 3 and not
otherwise, registered owners of not less than 60% in aggregate
principal amount of the Bonds then outstanding shall have the right
from time to time to consent to and approve the passage by the City
Council of any supplemental ordinance deemed necessary or desirable
by the City for the purpose of modifying, altering, amending,
supplementing or rescinding, in any particular, any of the terms or
provisions contained in this ordinance; except, unless approved in
writing by the registered owners of all the Bonds then outstanding,
nothing contained in this section shall permit, or be construed as
permitting:
(i) A change in the times, amounts or
currency of payment of the principal of or interest
on any outstanding Bond, or a reduction in the
principal amount of redemption price of any
outstanding Bond or a change in the method or
redemption price of any outstanding Bond or a
change in the method of determining the rate of
interest thereon, or
0075443.02
-44-
(ii) A preference of priority of any Bond or
Bonds or any other bond or bonds, or
(iii) A reduction in the aggregate principal
amount of Bonds, the consent of the registered
owners of Bonds of which is required for any such
supplemental ordinance.
(b) If at any time the City shall enact any
supplemental ordinance for any of the purposes of this subsection
27 . 3 , the Bond Registrar shall cause notice of the proposed
supplemental ordinance to be given by first-class United States
mail to all registered owners of the then outstanding Bonds and to
Moody's Investors Service, Inc. , and Standard & Poor's Corporation,
as the case may be. Such notice shall briefly set forth the nature
of the proposed supplemental ordinance and shall state that a copy
thereof is on file at the office of the Bond Registrar for
inspection by all registered owners of the outstanding bonds.
(c) Within two years after the date of the mailing
of such notice, the City may enact such supplemental ordinance in
substantially the form described in such notice, but only if there
shall have first been delivered to the Bond Registrar (i) the
required consents, in writing, of the registered owners of the
Bonds, and (ii) an opinion of bond counsel to the City stating that
such supplemental ordinance is authorized or permitted by this
ordinance, and, upon the execution and delivery thereof, will be
valid and binding upon the City in accordance with its terms and
will not adversely affect the exemption from federal income
taxation of interest on the Bonds.
(d) If registered owners of not less than the
percentage of Bonds required by this subsection 27 . 3 shall have
0075443.02
-45-
consented to and approved the execution and delivery thereof as
herein provided, no owner of the Bonds shall have any right to
object to the enactment of such supplemental ordinance, or to
object to any of the terms and provisions contained therein or the
operation thereof, or in any manner to question the propriety of
the enactment thereof, or to enjoin or restrain the City or the
Bond Registrar from enacting the same or from taking any action
pursuant to the provisions thereof.
27.4 Effect of Amendments. Upon the execution and
delivery of any supplemental ordinance pursuant to the provisions
of this section, this ordinance shall be, and be deemed to be,
modified and amended in accordance therewith, and the respective
rights, duties and obligations under this ordinance of the City,
the Bond Registrar and all registered owners of Bonds then
outstanding, shall thereafter be determined, exercised and enforced
under this ordinance subject in all respects to such modifications
and amendments.
Section 28 . Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect
and be in force five (5) days from and after its passage, approval
and publication as provided by law.
By
DAN KELLEHER, Mayor
ATTEST:
BRENDA JACOBER, City Clerk
0075443.02
-46-
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Special Counsel and Bond
Counsel for the City
Passed the day of 1993 .
Approved the day of 1993 .
Published the day of 1993 .
I certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No.
passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, and
approved by the Mayor of the City of Kent as hereon indicated.
(SEAL)
BRENDA JACOBER, City Clerk
0075443.02
-47-
Kent City Council Meeting
Date August 3 , 1993
Category Other Business
1. SUBJECT: 196th ST. CORRIDOR BRIDGE DEMOLITION - EMERGENCY
FINDINGS AND RESOLUTION
2 . &UMMARY STATEMENT:
he existing bridge over Mill Creek on 196th Stt! has
been determined to be hazardous by our structural consultant-
bridge inspector. The bridge has deteriorated and holes have
developed over the bridge in the pavement section.
'fhe Public Works Committee that an emergency
demolition be commenced to remove the str cture. The principle
responsible parties to the cleanup effort have agreed to remove
the contaminated material along the bank.
k'05 reCC)wrV1eVjdeJ
3 . EXHIBITS : Public Works Director memo and Public Works minutes
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (2-0 with phone approval
by Jim Bennett to place item on Consent Calendar)
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS :
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: }
Councilmember t' moves, Councilmember �, seconds
that Resolution No. , finding and authorizing the removal
of the existing 196th Mill Creek Bridge on an emergency basis,
be adopted.
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 4B
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
JULY 211 1993
TO: PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE
FROM: DON WICKSTROM
RE: 196TH ST. CORRIDOR EXISTING BRIDGE OVER MILL CREEK
The existing two lane bridge over Mill Creek on 196th St. has been
determined to be hazardous by our structural consultant-bridge
inspector. The existing two lane wood bridge over Mill Creek is
adjacent to the Western Processing EPA Superfund cleanup site.
The bridge has been fenced off by the cleanup contractor, Chemical
Waste Management with a locked gate to prevent public access to the
superfund site . Recently however, the bridge deterioration has
quickened and holes have developed over the bridge in the pavement
section.
ACTION: Recommend emergency demolition of the structure. The
principle responsible parties to the cleanup effort have agreed to
remove the contaminated material along the bank.
the budget for same.
Committee unanimously agreed to establish project budget and
authorize the Mayor to sign the agreement.
North 4th Avenue Street Rebuild - Bid
Wickstrom stated that this is a project where we are re-overlaying
4th Ave. , north of 228th using our ISTEA allocation for our overlay
money. He said that it will be bidding on August 3rd, the day of
the Council meeting and we would like to award it that same
evening, if the bids are within budget.
Committee unanimously agreed to place the North 4th Ave St Rebuild
project on the August 3rd Council agenda and to award the contract
if the bids are within budget.
D196th St Corridor Bridge Over Mill Creek
Wickstrom explained that this is the bridge that goes into Western
Processing and in our subsequent work with PRPs we had the bridge
tested and the only thing it can support is pedestrian traffic. He
said that the bridge is on the 196th St right of way crossing Mill
Creek. He said if the bridge is torn down, access to Western
Processing will be off 72nd Ave . Wickstrom said we want to
demolish it and Western Processing will take care of the cleanup.
Committee unanimously agreed to the emergency demolition of the
bridge over Mill Creek.
Central Ave & Pioneer St Pedestrian Signal
Wickstrom stated that this is a signal pedestrian project on
Central & Pioneer by the Jr. High School , for which we were able to
get a grant in the amount of $27 , 000 . Wickstrom requested
authorization for the signing of the agreement and establishing the
budget for same. He stated that matching funds would come from the
James St Pedestrian Improvement.
Committee unanimously recommended authorization for signing the
agreement and establishing the budget for same.
In response to White, Lindell said the time-line on this would be
shortly after school begins .
Downtown Infrastructure Update
No comments on this item.
Royal Woods Manor - Bill of Sale
Committee unanimously agreed to approve the bill of sale.
4
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
AUGUST 3, ]993
TO: MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL
FROM: DON WICKSTROM
RE: 4TH AVENUE REBUILD (S 228TH ST TO 26+44N)
Bid opening for this project was held on August 3 , 1993 with two
bids received. The project consists of furnishing and placing
asphalt concrete pavement, roadway excavation, installation of
concrete driveways and other related work.
BID SUMMARY
1 . M. A. Segale, Inc. $243 , 274 . 00
2 . Lakeside Industries $262 , 838 . 95
Engineer ' s Estimate $273 , 355 . 75
It has been recommended by the Public Works Committee, that the low
bid received be accepted if the bid is within project budget. As
such, the Public Works Director recommends that M. A. Segale, Inc.
be awarded the contract for the North 4th Avenue Street Rebuild (S.
228th St. to 26+44N) in the bid amount of $243 , 274 . 00 .
MOTION: 1 /
Councilmember � - moves Councilmember '/Zv c
seconds that M. A. Segale, Inc. be awarded the contract for North
4th Avenue Street Rebuild (S. 228th St. to 26+44N) in the bid
amount of $243 , 274 . 00 .
�; L-,_
Kent City Council Meeting
Date August 3 , 1993
Category Bids
1. SUBJECT: NORTH 4th AVENUE STREET REBUILD
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: This project consists of furnishing and
placing asphalt concrete pavement, roadway excavation,
installation of concrete driveways and other related work. Bid
opening was held on August 3rd. Due to time constraints, the
Public Works Director will present the bid summary as received.
It has been recommended by the Public Works Committee that the
low bid be accepted for this contract, provided the low bid
received is within project budget .
3 . EXHIBITS: Public Works Director memo, Public Works minutes and
vicinity map
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (2-0)
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO >< YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
that the contract for the N. 4th Ave. Street Rebuild project be
awarded to in the amount of
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 5A
DEPARTMENT OF' PUBLIC WORKS
JULY 21 , 1993
TO: PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE
FROM: DON WICKSTROM W
RE: N. 4TH AVENUE STREET REBUILD
The North 4th Avenue Street Rebuild bid opening has been scheduled
for August 3rd. The project consists of furnishing and placing
approximately 4 , 345 tons of asphalt concrete pavement, roadway
excavation, installation of concrete driveways and other related
work.
The next Public Works Committee meeting is August 4th, therefore
the award of this contract would be held over until the August 17th
Council meeting, thereby delaying the start of the project until
the first part of September. As such, we are requesting
authorization to place this item on the August 3rd Council agenda
for award of this contract.
ACTION: Authorization to place the N. 4th Avenue Street Rebuild
contract on the August 3rd Council agenda, providing the low bid
received is within project budget.
ELEMENTAHy
_ti cT y &CHOOL I J
212rH sr
I�
O'BRII:N
I
Flre Station
® i
_. 8. 216 th. ST. r` N
\ SO. 2i6 TH ST.
S 218TH
PROIIJECT LOCATION
IN[!USTFIAL
^ t
S. 220TH ST. Al2FA
< J e>
Fy 0 e, Sub StAtion
ST
S 222HUv
11 12 12 ^ 7
14 13 h l 0 13 18
p %
� r
rn S227TH FL s NORT >
w KEN
INTC G <
z o �
1 d
Z ^ S 228 ST s o 226
aLST
a
S m
W
INDUSTRIAL AREA �+ `� a \ < o <
< z
NOVA. L
400 z 167
N
P
40 S. 234TH inF Z
� m
v
z
_ W c'��
COU ST >
} s
O O : (.:• L.''� LD110N �1•
CLOUDY ST ai ry "s'��' WAY PgEEE
Y
S 238T7i 3 < W LOU Y ST w w
r U K <
:t E GE ROE `JO /
14 ST x > > i
-----1 13 �/j
/ " z r z z Z 3a < g < I
2 6 AMES ST Z Z 3
23 ; 24 a
•� � IH/111 rt.� �' KENT w tprL
W
JR�Hll. 24 > < O a
SAM ST < w '1-' > SC60L < E O
< < Atnlet,c Fld CED 3T
i
< PIO EER S. Ic
s Z
oo Q _
(Pvt1 Z U 1 O Mc ILLAN E -� M RA E ST MII.WAL'K}t. K
> C 7
the budget for same.
Committee unanimously agreed to establish project budget and
authorize the Mayor to sign the agreement .
DNorth 4th Avenue Street Rebuild - Bid
Wickstrom stated that this is a project where we are re-overlaying
4th Ave. , north of 228th using our ISTEA allocation for our overlay
money. He said that it will be bidding on August 3rd, the day of
the Council meeting and we would like to award it that same
evening, if the bids are within budget .
Committee unanimously agreed to place the North 4th Ave St Rebuild
project on the August 3rd Council agenda and to award the contract
if the bids are within budget.
196th St Corridor Bridge over Mill Creek
Wickstrom explained that this is the bridge that goes into Western
Processing and in our subsequent work with PRPs we had the bridge
tested and the only thing it can support is pedestrian traffic. He
said that the bridge is on the 196th St right of way crossing Mill
Creek. He said if the bridge is torn down, access to Western
Processing will be off 72nd Ave. Wickstrom said we want to
demolish it and Western Processing will take care of the cleanup.
Committee unanimously agreed to the emergency demolition of the
bridge over Mill Creek.
Central Ave & Pioneer St Pedestrian Signal
Wickstrom stated that this is a signal pedestrian project on
Central & Pioneer by the Jr. High School, for which we were able to
get a grant in the amount of $27 , 000 . Wickstrom requested
authorization for the signing of the agreement and establishing the
budget for same. He stated that matching funds would come from the
James St Pedestrian Improvement.
Committee unanimously recommended authorization for signing the
agreement and establishing the budget for same.
In response to White, Lindell said the time-line on this would be
shortly after school begins .
Downtown Infrastructure Update
No comments on this item.
Royal Woods Manor - Bill of Sale
Committee unanimously agreed to approve the bill of sale.
4
Kent City Council Meeting
Date August 3 , 1993
Category Bids
1. SUBJECT: TRUCK MOUNTED SEWER & CATCH BASIN CLEANER
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Six bids were received on this project.
The two low bidders, Sahlberg Equipment and Seattle Crane did
not meet the bid specification requirements. It has been
recommended by the Public Works Committee that these two bids
be rejected as non-responsive and that the bid submitted by
Pacific Utilities in the amount of $129 , 000 plus tax, for the
1993 Peabody Meyers Vactor, be accepted. btip11T. '�o Njc �J_b
�CY2 rlFV1, CGt, I t i Ed •
3 . EXHIBITS: Public Works Director memo and Public Works minutes
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (2-0)
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: O YES _
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
S RCS F FUNDS:
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember' tiII�-' moves, Councilmember y seconds
that the bids s mitted by Sahlberg Equipment and Seattle Crane
be rejected as ng non-responsive and that the bid in the
amount of $129 ,000`. lus tax, as submitted by Pacific Utilities
for the 1993 Pea Meyers Vactor, be accepted.
DISCUSSION:
ACTION Y ` vti�V
Council Agenda
Item No. 5B
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
JULY 7, 1993
TO: PUBLIC WORKS COMMMTEE
FROM: DON WICKSTROM 7
RE: TRUCK MOUNTED SEWER & CATCH BASIN CLEANER
We received six bids on this project. The low bidder as well as
other bidders did not meet the bid specification requirements . As
such, we are recommending that the bids submitted by Sahlberg
Equipment and Seattle Crane be rejected as being non-responsive and
that the bid in the amount of $129 , 000 plus tax as submitted by
Pacific Utilities for the 1993 Peabody Meyers Vactor be accepted.
ACTION: Recommend that the bids submitted by Sahlberg Equipment
and Seattle Crane be rejected as being non-responsive and that the
bid in the amount of $129 , 000. 00 plus tax as submitted by Pacific
Utilities for the 1993 Peabody Meyers Vactor be accepted.
MEMORANDUM
DATE: July 1 st 1993
TO: Don Wickstrom, Public Works Director
THRU: Tim Heydon, Operations Mana. r
FROM: Jack Spencer, Fleet Manager(-7—�,�-�-� y�� �
SUBJECT: Truck Mounted Sewer and Ca h Basin eaner
We received six bids from three different companies. The bids are as follows:
Sahlberg Equipment 1993 Guzzler $150,000.00
New Demonstrator Model 3580 40,000.00 Trade
Ford LNT 9000 -----------------
$110,250.00
This unit has many things that do not meet the specifications requested especially the lack of an
automatic transmission which is desired in a vehicle of this weight to be operated on hills in the
City. I feel it should not be considered.
Sahlberg Equipment 1993 Guzzler $163,475.00
New Unit Model B3565 FL80 40,000.00 Trade
180 Days Delivery -----------------
123,475.00
This unit also has many items that do not meet specifications but is on a better equipped truck
than the demo. The water tank is included in the same assembly as the debris tank. Also, it
lacks the reach with the vacuum hose of the Vactor. We would have to wait at least 120 days for
delivery.
Seattle Crane Super Products Camel 200 $149,500.00
New Unit 20,000.00 Trade
Ford -----------------
$129,500.00
Seattle Crane Super Products Camel 200 $146,000.00
Demonstrator $ 20,000.00 Trade
Navistar 4900 -----------------
(too many miles and hours on unit) $126,000.00
On both Camel units, there are many exceptions to the bid specifications. Water tanks are
polyethylene material and mounted on the outside of the debris tank. Front water pump controls
are located in the cab of the chassis (off/on switch)
DATE: July 1st, 1993
TO: Don Wickstrom, Public Works Director
FROM: Tim Heydon, Operations Manager
SUBJECT: Truck Mounted Sewer and Catch Basin Cleaner
Page 2 of 2
Pacific Utilities Peabody Meyers Vactor $159,000.00
1993 Chevrolet 2110-36 30,000.00 Trade
-----------------
Demonstrator
$129,000.00
This unit is available for immediate delivery.
This unit meets all specifications.
Pacific Utilities Peabody Meyers Vactor $171 ,522.71
New 30,000.00 Trade
1994 Chevrolet 2110-36
$141,522.71
1 have met with the Sewer and Storm Superintendent and we have reviewed the specifications
and bids on all the vehicles offered. We are recommending the bid be awarded to Pacific Utilities
for the purchase of the demonstrator unit with the trade for 129,000.00 plus tax.
This machine has been demonstrated for the using department and they have expressed their
approval.
JS/map
B:ER017
liabilities involved with additional crossing of the railroad .
John Streich stated that he would like some input into the design
of the project. Streich will be in contact with LaPorte on this
issue.
Segregation Request - LID 327 & LID 330
Wickstrom stated that this is a parcel in Van Doren ' s Landing that
Birtcher Frank Properties wants to sell . As a result, they have to
segregate out the assessments for these two projects on this parcel
so they can pay off that assessment.
Brubaker said typically we would go before Council with the
segregations approved and the City Attorney is directed to draw up
the necessary ordinance. However, because of time constraints,
Birtcher has asked that we have the ordinance prepared at the
meeting so that if it is approved, the ordinance can be passed.
Committee unanimously approved placement of the Segregation Request
on LID 327 & LID 330 on the July 20th Council agenda and that the
City Attorney prepare the necessary ordinance for acceptance.
Six Year T. I . P. Plan - Set Hearing Date
Wickstrom stated that we plan to bring the Six Year Plan to the
next committee meeting. He said it is clue back to the State by the
end of July however, we won ' t make that date. Wickstrom said that
we need to set a hearing date at the first Council meeting in
August.
Committee unanimously approved setting the hearing for the Six Year
TIP Plan at the next Council meeting.
McCarthy asked if this is tied in with what the C. I .P. is going to
be requesting. He said that we will be having a public hearing on
the C. I .P. that same night and asked if projects which are listed
in the C. I .P. are the same ones we have on the T. I .P. list.
Wickstrom stated that they are, however we load up the Six Year
Plan in order to secure grants . Wickstrom also stated that what we
have in the C. I .P. is quite a bit less than what we show in the Six
Year Plan.
Horseshoe Acres Pump Station - Acceptance
Committee unanimously recommended acceptance of the Horseshoe Acres
Pump Station as complete.
Truck Mounted Sewer & Catch Basin Cleaner
Wickstrom stated that we received several bids however the low bids
were non-responsive in that they didn ' t meet the specifications and
6
we are recommending that the bids submitted by Sahlberg Equipment
and Seattle Crane be rejected as being non-responsive and that the
bid in the amount of $129 , 000 plus tar., be awarded to Pacific
Utilities for the 1993 Peabody Meyers Vactor be accepted.
Wickstrom said that this bid is within budget.
Committee unanimously recommended acceptance of the bid submitted
by Pacific Utilities in the amount of $1.29 , 000 plus tar..
Green River Trail
Wickstrom said there are two little dips in the levee along the
golf course north of Meeker St. that we are raising and that ' s
where we are applying for a Shoreline Management permit.
Wickstrom said that we are still in the design phase. We are
trying to design that last small section under the bridge; we have
to raise the levee 3 ' feet in that area and we have a 15 ' clearance
with the bridge so we are having the consultant do a retaining wall
along the curve . Wickstrom said once that is done, we will be out
to bid.
Meeting adjourned at 6 : 25 PM.
7
CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS
A.
R E P O R T S
A. COUNCIL PRESIDENT
B. OPERATIONS COMMITTEE
C. PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE
D. PLANNING COMMITTEE
E. PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE
F. PARKS COMMITTEE
G. BUDGET COMMITTEE
H. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS
MCCARTHY,TONY / KENT70/AD - HPDesk print.
-----------------------------------------
bject: 7/30 ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
_eator: Tony MCCARTHY / KENT70/AD Dated: 01/06/93 at 0949.
TO: MAYOR KELLEHER, COUNCIL PRESIDENT WOODS AND COUNCIL MEMBERS
JUST A REMINDER ABOUT FUTURE WORKSHOPS. AS YOU KNOW WE HAVE TRIED TO RESERVE
THE FIRST TUESDAY OF EACH MONTH FROM 6PM TO 7PM AS WORKSHOP TIME. AS SUCH
FOLLOWING IS PLANNED SCHEDULE FOR THE NEXT FEW MONTHS:
8/3 BUDGET - MAY MILLER WILL PROVIDE A 6/30/93 FINANCIAL REPORT
WHICH WILL PROVIDE THE BASIS FOR THE 1994 BUDGET.
9/X(*) GROWTH MANAGEMENT ACT CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN - THE PLANNING
DEPARTMENT WILL INTRODUCE HENDERSON & YOUNG WHO
WILL BRING THE COUNCIL UP TO DATE ON WORK REQUIRED
TO DEVELOP A CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN THAT MEETS THE
REQUIREMENTS OF THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT ACT.
10/5 REGIONAL JUSTICE CENTER - CITY AND KING COUNTY STAFF WILL BRING
THE COUNCIL UP TO DATE ON REGIONAL JUSTICE CENTER
ISSUES. BY THAT TIME A PROCESS SHOULD BE IN PLACE
TO GATHER BUSINESS AND CITIZEN INPUT ON THE PROJECT.
(*) THIS MEETING MAY NEED TO BE ON 3RD TUESDAY TO MEET WITH HENDERSON AND
YOUNG'S SCHEDULE.
_ .EASE INSURE THAT YOU HAVE ON YOUR CALENDAR THE UPCOMING JOINT MEETING WITH
THE KENT SCHOOL BOARD. IT IS SCHEDULED FOR 8/25 FROM 6 TO 8 PM IN THE SCHOOL
DISTRICT BOARD ROOM. THE PLAN IS THAT IT WILL BE A CAUSAL GET TOGETHER, WITH
THE FOLLOWING TOPICS BEING A POTENTIAL FOR INDIVIDUAL DISCUSSION.
PROJECT LIGHTHOUSE
YOUTH CENTER PROPOSAL
SCHOOL SECURITY PROGRAM
JOINT USE OF FACILITIES AGREEMENT
SCHOOL BUSES FOR IN CITY TRANSIT PROGRAM
PERFORMAING ARTS CENTER INTERFACES
AFTER TONIGHT'S MEETING, I 'LL BE ON VACATION TIL 8/16. IN MY ABSENCE ROGER
LUBOVICH WILL BE IN CHARGE.
UPCOMING EVENTS
8/3 6PM COUNCIL WORKSHOP - PRELIMINARY OF 1994 BUDGET PICTURE
8/21-22 MILL CRK CANTERBURY FAIRE
8/25 6PM KSD BRD RM COUNCIL MEETING WITH THE KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD
8/26 9-2 SR CNTR COUNCIL BUDGET WORKSHOP WITH DEPARTMENT HEADS IF NEEDED
9/14 ELECTION DAY FOR ANNEXATION TO KING COUNTY LIBRARY
Q/17 LAST DAY TO FILE RESOLUTION/ORDINANCE FOR 11/2 ELECTION
/18 SNR CNTR 8TH ANNUAL TOWN HALL MEETING
.4/4 WINTERFEST PARADE & HOLIDAY LIGHTING CEREMONY
BUDGET COMMITTEE MEETING
July 26, 1993
PRESENT: Jon Johnson - Chair, Leona Orr, Jim White, May Miller, Cliff Craig, Roger Lubovich,
Chief Angelo, Chief Crawford, Ramona Fultz, Alana McIalwain, Sue Viseth, Adriane Kelly, Patrice
Thorell, Lori Hogan, Don Wickstrom, Lin Ball, Mary Berg, Jean Parietti, Dee Moschel, Don
McDaniel, Linda Johnson, and Kathy Peters.
The meeting was called to order at 4:00 p.m. by Chairman Johnson.
JUNE FINANCIAL REPORT
This item has been deferred to the 8/3/93 Council Workshop to avoid duplication of presentation
of financial material.
DOWNTOWN PARTNERSHIP FUNDING 1993 & 1994
Don McDaniel, President of the Kent Downtown Partnership, gave a brief presentation of what has
been accomplished thus far and what the goals are for the future. He expressed appreciation to the
City for the strong partnership and commitment to the economic development programs that the
Downtown Partnership has been developing. He noted that the matching fund goal has been met
from the community, but that an additional $7,000 is needed from the City for the balance of 1993
so that the objectives planned for this year can be accomplished. He explained that the Partnership
will be requesting, during the budget process, a matching budget allocation from the City of$32,000
for the 1994 Budget. Linda Johnson, Kent Downtown Partnership, noted that the first small
business has been successfully brought into the City, and they are very excited because this is just
the beginning. WHITE MOVED to approve the $7,000 request for additional funds for the balance
of 1993. Orr seconded and the motion carried 3-0.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM UPDATE
Acting Finance Director Miller explained that there is $1.5 million more available for capital
improvements because the sales and real estate excise taxes came in higher than anticipated. She
noted a memo in the packet from Lori Hogan, Supt. of Recreation, which gives details and
justification regarding the broken down air conditioner in the Kent Commons Building. Hogan
noted that there is a real health problem and illness for the 15 full-time City employees and 40
employees of agencies who lease space in the facility because of the heat. She also noted that
considerable rental revenue is lost due to excessive temperatures and that the slowest rental period
is in the summer months.
White suggested that a fund be created to pay for public service vehicles and equipment so that the
budget is not heavily hit and everything is on a more even keel. Miller distributed a copy of Lin
Ball's memo, Human Services Manager, regarding housing for homeless men and noted that it is
also included on the CIP list. Ball reviewed the project outlining the history and additional
information describing the program. She noted that the Agency has an option to purchase a 3,000
sq. ft. house on Titus Street and turn it into a 12-bedroom home, but that quite a bit of renovation,
as well as adding an addition, needs to be done. She noted that the $150,000 figure from the City
could be reduced to $130,000, and if the Federal McKinney grant is given then this money would
not be needed at all. White expressed concern with individuals making this a career and drawing
people from all over the area, but that he has no problem with helping people get back into society.
Ball clarified for White that the voucher system would still be used during the severe weather, but
this program is designed to move out of and diminish some of the voucher program. Kathy Peters,
Catholic Community Services, noted that the majority of men are working but cannot afford the
housing so this program is to help stabilize, set up savings accounts in local banks, and save up for
the first and last month's rent which averages a little over $1,000.
Miller noted that Don Wickstrom, Public Works Director, wanted to substitute the James Street &
Central Avenue Right Turn Lane project with the 212th Street project because some TIB grant
money has been received for this project. She noted that the Golf Advisory Committee will, in the
Fall of 1993, prioritize the golf course plan showing the proposed 1993 buyout expenditures and
some capital items. White requested that more detail be given to Public Safety emergency
equipment as this should be a high priority in any government, but to continue with some of the
other projects also. White clarified that a plan needs to be put in place rather than to wait until it
becomes an emergency to replace the Public Safety equipment. Miller noted that this is just an
information item at this point with a Council Workshop scheduled for August 3rd.
SCHOOL SECURITY PROGRAM
Chief Crawford explained that authorization is being requested for an additional Police Officer
position to augment the Kent School District's request. He noted that the School District is
changing their security arrangements, and discontinuing the traditional security officer positions
because they are attempting to design a security program evolved around a commissioned police
officer being responsible for the schools when school is in session. He clarified for White that the
officer would be working in Kent Schools only and that a King County Police Officer would be
responsible for schools outside of the Kent City Limits. He explained that the School District will
pay the basic wage and benefits of $47,000, and that the cost to the City would be for equipment
and the use of a car. WHITE MOVED to approve the authorization of an additional Police Officer
position with the Kent School District paying the basic wage and benefits of $47,000 and the City
being responsible for equipment and use of a car. Orr seconded and the motion carried 3-0.
POLICE/FIRE SURVEILLANCE EQUIPMENT
Mary Berg, Assistant Fire Chief, explained that this is a joint proposal between the Police and Fire
Departments to upgrade the video surveillance equipment used in the investigation of crimes. Chief
Angelo noted that the funding will come out of the Public Safety Bond Issue. WHITE MOVED for
approval to upgrade the video surveillance equipment used by the Police and Fire Departments. Orr
seconded and the motion carried 3-0.
CAPITAL AND MAINTENANCE REQUEST FOR GOLF COMPLEX
Patrice Thorell, Acting Parks Director, explained that the Golf Advisory Board met in June to
decide what to do with the buyout funds from the Golf Complex, and that their recommendation,
along with the Parks Committee, was to expend $60,000 for the 1993 Golf Complex improvements.
Upon White's question, Thorell noted that the ball washer will wash between 20,000-50,000 balls
a day and will be used for the driving range. Thorell explained that the detailed expenditure
recommendations cover the following: 1) maintenance projects - in priority order; 2) complex
improvements for the Par 3 Course, Driving Range, and 18 Hole; and 3) course rest rooms which
is to purchase two stand alone units. She noted that the total improvements came to $65,685 which
is a little above the estimated figure, but that the total amount of buyout funds was over $100,000
and that there is money in the budget to cover these costs. WHITE MOVED to approve expenditure
of $65,685 from the buyout funds for the Riverbend Golf Complex improvements. Orr seconded
and the motion carried 3-0.
The meeting was adjourned at 5:10 p.m.
Parks Committee Minutes
July 13, 1993
Councilmembers Present: Jim Bennett, Chair; Christi Ilouser, and Jon Johnson.
Staff Present: Tony McCarthy, Patrice Thorell, Dave Owen, Dave Heldt, Lori Hogan, Cheryl
Fraser, Helen Wickstrom, Ed Crawford,Jack Ball, Karen Ford, May Miller, Alana
McIalwain, and Pam Rumer.
Others Present: Jean Parietti, Valley Daily News; Sue Goddard, Golf Advisory Board Chair; Diane
Lewis. Project Lighthouse; DowZ Schwab, Riverbend Men's Club; Bill Doolittle,
412 N. Washington; Keith Sanden, Riverbend Golf Complex Director; Judy
Gilrov, 3716 S 253rd Place, Kent; and Brett Vicky David and Clinton Olson,
Steel Lake Little League.
KENT COMMONS COMPLIMENTARY LETTER FROM CITIZEN
Councilmember Bennett received a note of appreciation from Mr. Bausa, a citizen who uses the Kent
Commons, complimenting the staff at the facility. Mr. Bausa wrote that the facility is clean, the staff is
friendly and helpful, and the City of Kent is lucky to have such a great facility in the community.
REQUEST OF STEEL LAKE LITTLE LEAGUE
The property located at 43rd Avenue and South 216th is currently leased to Steel Lake Little League
by the City of Seattle. Seattle acquired the property as part of the settlement in the closure of the Kent
Highlands Landfill and paid approximately $7 million for 350 acres, including the landfill. The Little
League operates on the northernmost piece of the property which is approximately 19 acres.
The City of Seattle is interested in selling approximately 20-1 acres of the property. The Steel Lake Little
League has made numerous improvements to the property over their 35 year lease agreement with the
City of Seattle, which has a 60 day termination clause.
The Steel Lake Little League serves approximately 550 kids of which approximately 100 have Kent West
Hill addresses. They have requested that the City of Kent do what it can to preserve the fields.
Tony McCarthy listed three options:
1) Look at acquiring the property from the City of Seattle. Seattle prefers a buyer for the
entire 207 acres.
2) Look at encouraging the City of Seattle to sell the property with the condition that the
ballfields be maintained.
3) Look at establishing rezoning conditions on a potential buyer which would require
continuation of a ballfield complex on the property.
Brett Olson, Co-Director of Fields for the Steel Lake Little League, spoke to the Parks Committee and
explained the Little League's campaign to save their fields. Mr. Olson said that he has contacted
numerous public officials, state and county legislators, and municipalities, and reported that everyone in
the community has been receptive to saving the fields.
McCarthy explained that Seattle prefers a buyer for the entire 207 acres. The City of Seattle feels that
this particular parcel is the entrance to the property and is also the farthest away from the Kent
Highlands Landfill.
2
Councilmember Bennett asked if the City has any property to exchange for Seattle to sell. McCarthy
suggested the Commons Playfield as a possibility. Thorell added that any fields the City sells would have
to be replaced.
Councilmember Johnson moved to direct staff to look at the possibility of acquiring the property from
the City of Seattle, whether it is 14 acres or some combination of 200 acres down to 14 acres. He
commented that because the property is zoned AG, its value is not a lot. Once a potential buyer realizes
that there is no water or sewer services readily available, the City of Seattle may be willing to negotiate
a price. Johnson said that the City's programs and the Little League's programs are successful, and the
City may be able to acquire additional property for the Citv of Kent.
Councilmember Houser seconded the motion.
Doug Schwab spoke in support of Councilmember Johnson's motion. He felt that the property would
be a prime location for recreational facilities and suggested that the City explore the possibility of an
additional golf course.
Lori Hogan echoed everyone's sentiments that the City is in need of additional fields. She added that
the Commons Playfield is a valuable commodity, as it is used for soccer and track as well as for softball
and baseball.
Councilmember Bennett encouraged Mr. Olson to maintain his enthusiasm and to be patient while staff
investigate the possibility of helping to save the Steel Lake Little League fields. The City will keep him
advised of progress.
Councilmember Johnson directed Administration to talk with the City of Seattle to see if they are firm
in selling the entire property or if they are willing to sell a portion of the property.
The motion passed unanimously.
Councilmember Johnson clarified for McCarthy that his motion is for staff to bring back information to
the next Parks Committee meeting.
PERFORMING ARTS CENI'EI2 UPDATE
Pat Curran, Chair of the Performing Arts Center Task Force, reported that a Request for Proposal was
sent out with a deadline of June 18. 25 responses were received. The proposal was for a schematic
design and business plan for Phase II of the performing arts center. Ms. Curran said the Task Force is
now going over proposals and will narrow them down to 3 or 4. Those candidates will be interviewed
in October, with a selection by late Fall.
REPORT BY RIVERBEND GOLF COMPLEX DIRECTOR, KEITH SANDEN
Keith Sanden reported that he received a letter of request from the Washington State Women's Public
Links Association requesting use of the Riverbend Golf Course in 1995. The group has used the facility
before, and Mr. Sanden felt this would be good exposure promotion-wise for Riverbend.
Sue Goddard, President of the Riverbend Ladies' Club, explained that the golf course will have to be
shut down for three days in order to host the tournament. Because revenue from play will be
interrupted, the WSWPLA will negotiate a fee with the golf course for coverage. The schedule is set
years in advance. Ms. Goddard said it is an honor that Riverbend has been asked and encouraged the
Parks Committee to fulfill the request.
1
Councilmember Johnson moved to approve the Washington State Women's Public Links Association
request to hold their championship tournament at Riverbend Golf Course in July 1995. Councilmember
Houser seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously.
McCarthy directed Mr. Sanden to work with Patrice Thorell in obtaining approval of fees negotiated with
the WSWPLA.
Mr. Sanden also reported that the putting green proposal which he discussed at the last meeting did not
work out. Construction of the green is not satisfactory at this time, but he is still researching the
possibility of a putting green at the driving range.
Mr. Sanden said that things are going well at the complex. He commented that it is a busier complex
than he imagined. The new kitchen will be on line early next week.
Councilmember Houser requested that Mr. Sanden paint the ladies' room white at the Par-3 course and
install more lights. He informed her that the restroom has been painted and mirrors are on order.
Doug Schwab mentioned a letter to the editor that appeared in the Valley Daily News in which a young
lady and a friend visited the mini putt to play and were not pleased with the condition of the facility.
Schwab asked if anyone from the City of Kent, the golf complex, or the Golf Advisory Board had
responded to the young lady's concerns. McCarthy directed Thorell to respond to the young lady.
Councilmember Bennett thanked the Golf Maintenance staff for responding quickly and taking care of
the mini putt.
GOLF ADVISORY BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS FOR USE OF BUYOUT FUNDS
Sue Goddard, Chair of the Golf Advisory Board, explained that the buyout revenue coming to the City
is $161,888.91. The Golf Advisory Board is proposing that $60,000 be used for short term improvements
that are directed toward customers and at attracting repeat business. Ms. Goddard said the improvements
are necessary to keep revenues up. She explained the Golf Advisory Board's list of recommended
improvements.
BIDS FOR PAINTING THE EXTERIOR OF THE GOLF COMPLEX
Jack Ball obtained bids for painting the outside of the buildings at the complex. Because Kent is a
municipality, the City legally has to pay prevailing wages. As a result, Thorell said that bids may go up
significantly, as prevailing wages were not originally considered.
Mr. Sanden mentioned that he knows an individual who has done work for him before. The gentleman
is an independent contractor who does the work and pays himself. Sanden questioned how prevailing
wages apply to this situation. Staff will confer with the City Attorney.
McCarthy suggested that the Committee could approve the $60,000 and do what can be done with that
amount. He also mentioned that some items on the list could be done with funds from the operating
budget.
Councilmember Houser moved to approve the $60,000 for improvements at the golf complex.
Councilmember Johnson seconded. The motion passed unanimously.
This issue will be discussed at the July 26 Budget Committee meeting.
4
PROJECT LIGI-rri-ioDSF - TEEN RCCRLA"LION PROGIZAM
Cheryl Fraser reported that Project Lighthouse has formally requested that the City of Kent provide a
teen recreation program as one component of the overall Project Lighthouse program. If funded, this
will be a two day a week program at Sequoia Jr. High School, with a total proposed budget of $45,222.
of which $18,000 will come from the Criminal Justice Fund. Project Lighthouse has also received funding
from other agencies.
Diane Lewis from Project Lighthouse explained that as the program progresses,Project Lighthouse would
like the City of Kent to take an active role. The City of Kent is one of many who will be approached
for funding.
McCarthy reported that the Mayor favors the program it it is a community-involved project. He
total community involvement, the Mayor is willing to recommend the
explained that as long as there is
City's budget.
McCarthy stated that if funding for Project Lighthouse is approved this year, he will need to know very
soon what the program will cost in 1994. as he is putting together the Mayor's budget.
Ms. Lewis explained that the program does have school district commitment. She receives calls daily
t time and resources into Project Lighthouse. She said
from groups and individuals who are anxious to pu
she hopes to expand the number of agencies involved next year.
Included in those areas requested to be funded by the City is an increase of the Youth at Risk
Coordinator position from /4 to full time to cover the Project Lighthouse program, as Project
Lighthouse has asked the Parks Department to implement the recreation portion of the program. The
Committee expressed concerns about this proposed increase.
Ms. Lewis explained that Project Lighthouse will serve some of same population that is served by the
Parks Department's Youth-at-Risk program. McCarthy again informed the Committee that the Mayor
is willing to support this program if other agencies will contribute to the program and this is not just an
expansion of the Parks program. McCarthy said the City is already paying full time benefits to the
Youth-at-Risk Coordinator now. This increase will involve the remaining 1/4 of the salary for the
position. Because the Project Lighthouse program runs for five months, the cost is approximately
$10,000. Chief Crawford added that the program has to be properly staffed and supervised with people
who know how to do the job.
Councilmember Johnson moved to approve funding of$45,222 for Project Lighthouse. Councilmember
Houser seconded.
Bill Doolittle questioned the amount expended per hour per child. Councilmember Houser explained
that attendance may go up or down. Ms. Lewis added that the program is not limited to 100 participants;
it is a ballpark figure and may fluctuate.
Councilmember Bennett commented that as a community, the City needs to address youth issues. He
felt the program has so much support and energy that $27,000 is an inexpensive investment in our youth.
The motion passed unanimously.
This will appear on the Council agenda under 'Other Business.'
PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES
JULY 19, 1993
COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT: Leona Orr
Jon Johnson
STAFF PRESENT: Chief Crawford
Dave Haenel
Tony McCarthy
Chief Angelo
Mary Berg
Dennis Byerly
MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC: Unidentified press person
The Meeting was called to order at 5:30 p.m. by Committeemember Johnson.
DRAFT SURVEY ON WEST HILL FIRE STATION
Chief Angelo explained that at the last meeting the Committee had requested a survey be sent
to residents on the West Hill regarding whether or not a tot lot should be placed on the old Fire
Station site, as promised with the closing of the Midway Landfill. He distributed a copy of a
cover letter with the survey for review and comment. He noted that the letter and survey will
be delivered door-to-door on Friday, Saturday and Sunday to residents on the west side of
Military Road where the site is located because they expressed the most interest in the property.
STATION 74 EMERGENCY GENERATOR UPDATE
Chief Angelo explained that an emergency generator was approved in the 1993 CIP for the East
Hill Complex. He briefly updated the Committee on the progress to date. He noted that the
next step is to submit specifications and modifications to the Attorney's office for review and
then it will go out for bid.
McCarthy informed the Committee that the City Hall generator will be down for a short period
of time because they are in the process of digging out the underground tank associated with the
generator.
UPDATE ON ARSON SITUATION
Chief Berg explained that they are requesting a method for upgrading the surveillance equipment
on potential arson sites which is a joint proposal between the Fire and Police Departments.
They are requesting $6,500 for the Fire Department and $9,400 for the Police Department and
that the money would come from the interest accrued from the Public Safety Bond Issue. He
noted that this equipment would be placed in a pool to be used by either department as the need
arose. Chief Angelo noted that this item will be discussed at the next Executive Committee
meeting and the Budget Committee for approval.
DRINKING DRIVER TASK FORCE REQUEST FOR ACCEPTANCE OF
CONTRIBUTIONS
Chief Crawford noted that contributions have been won for the "Game of Life" Youth Wellness
Conference as follows: 1) $7,500 from the Beer Institute, and; 2) $1,000 from the Chamber of
Commerce Foundation. He requested acceptance of the money. ORR MOVED to accept these
monies. Johnson seconded and the motion carried 2-0.
LIAISON OFFICER POSITION WITH KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
Chief Crawford explained that the Kent School District had a five person security force working
after hours and as hall monitors in the schools. He noted that they are revamping their security
and are not planning to rehire the five person force for next year, but would Iike to hire a Kent
Police Officer for the Kent schools and a King County Police Officer for schools outside of
Kent. Crawford noted that the Executive Committee has given authorization for another police
position but that approval is needed from the Public Safety and Budget Committees also. He
explained that the Kent School District would be paying $47,000 a year for the position which
will be an 8:00-5:00 job. Upon Orr's question, Crawford explained that an additional vehicle
is not being requested at this time, but could be needed at a later date. ORR MOVED to
approve the authorization for a new police position based on the Kent School District Plan.
Johnson seconded and the motion carried 2-0.
CORNUCOPIA DAYS REVIEW
Chief Crawford explained that extra patrol was added for Kent Cornucopia Days and the Balloon
Classic to offer more security. He noted that groups were not allowed to gather as they did last
year creating a sense of tension and fear; and that everyone seemed to enjoy themselves.
The meeting adjourned at 5:55 p.m.
PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE
JULY 21 , 1993
PRESENT: JIM WHITE KEVIN LINDELL
JON JOHNSON DICK GILLISSEE
DON WICKSTROM MR & MRS RUST
TONY McCARTHY BRUCE RAYBURN
GARY GILL MR & MRS SCALZO
TOM BRUBAKER
ABSENT: COMMITTEE MEMBER PAUL MANN
City of SeaTac Request for Sewers
Bruce Rayburn stated that he had submitted a letter to Don
Wickstrom requesting that sanitary sewers be constructed in the
City of SeaTac, as well as some area of unincorporated King County
lying between Military Road and the western boundary of Kent.
Rayburn indicated that approximately two years ago, the same type
of proposal was brought before this committee and then on to the
Planning Committee who had previously denied this request. Rayburn
displayed a wall chart showing a schematic of sewers within the
city limits of SeaTac only, with the intention that they be
accommodated by the existing Metro system which ends at the river.
Rayburn said, to get to that point from Orillia Rd. we will still
keep a proposed pump station which would then make this a force
line. Rayburn said that a major concern is the matter of land use,
in terms of how this property is developed. Rayburn stated that
SeaTac is starting their Utility Comp Plan and it will address
sanitary sewers, water and storm drains.
Brubaker stated that Kent does have a moratorium. White asked if
the moratorium extends to another city? Brubaker said he wasn't
sure, however we do have exemptions for non-profit organizations.
Wickstrom stated that this would be SeaTac' s sewer utility not
Kent ' s. He further said that SeaTac is essentially looking for
permission to run a force main into our right of way. Wickstrom
said it would be SeaTac, not Kent, extending sewer. White said he
would not be comfortable with Kent extending sewers west of the
river. White further stated that he has no problem with the City
of SeaTac connecting to a Metro sewer on the east side of the
river. White said they would be serving their city (SeaTac) and we
should not block service.
Brubaker said that he doesn ' t really feel that land use is an
issue. He said that the last time this topic came forth,
1
controlling the land use designation in SeaTac was discussed with
respect to high density apartments in that area. Brubaker said it
was previously discussed that we cannot contract away the rights of
the SeaTac City Council . Brubaker said that possibly we could, as
a contractural condition of extending service, not try to control
the land use designation but control amount of flow or amount of
residences to be served. He said it would then be incumbent on the
city of SeaTac. White said that he is not sure whether we have the
right to tell another city what they do with their land use. He
further said that citizens in that city are paying for Metro in one
way or another so he questions why we are blocking them.
Johnson asked if we could grant a sewer extension and limit the
size of the capacity of the line. Wickstrom again stated that it
would be SeaTac ' s sewer and their force main, but would be in our
public right of way.
Committee directed staff to address the problem and come back to
the Committee with a workable recommendation.
Mar-Del Investment Street Vacation
Wickstrom said that this is a petition to vacate a piece of
property and as such requires a public hearing. He requested that
the hearing date be set for September 7th.
Committee unanimously recommended setting the public hearing for
September 7th.
T. I .P. - Presentation of Projects
Referring to the 194 through 199 project listing, Wickstrom said
that we did make a lot of changes in the first year, indicating on
a wall map which of the projects that had been rearranged. In
response to White' s question on the time-line on the Reith Rd. &
Meeker St. widening project, Wickstrom said we have a proposal with
the state and are waiting for them to buy off on our proposal.
Wickstrom explained that one of the additions made to the first
year's program was changing Canyon Drive to a Pedestrian and Bike
Lane project thinking we would probably get a better chance for a
grant. However, now the Federal money has been dictated and we are
not getting any money for that project.
White asked Wickstrom if a traffic signal at Russell Rd. & Meeker
St. "fits in" with this category of projects. Wickstrom stated
that it will be in one of our six year T. I.P.s.
Wickstrom said that we will have to do some adjusting in order to
move our 212th St. project up. He said we have submitted for a
grant application and it looks like we will get some money. In
response to White' s question on grade separation, Wickstrom said we
put that in the list to get some interest from it. He said that
2
the budget for same.
Committee unanimously agreed to establish project budget and
authorize the Mayor to sign the agreement.
North 4th Avenue Street Rebuild Bid
Wickstrom stated that this is a project where we are re-overlaying
4th Ave. , north of 228th using our ISTEA allocation for our overlay
money. He said that it will be bidding on August 3rd, the day of
the Council meeting and we would like to award it that same
evening, if the bids are within budget.
Committee unanimously agreed to place the North 4th Ave St Rebuild
project on the August 3rd Council agenda and to award the contract
if the bids are within budget.
196th St Corridor Bridge Over Mill Creek
Wickstrom explained that this is the bridge that goes into Western
Processing and in our subsequent work with PRPs we had the bridge
tested and the only thing it can support is pedestrian traffic. He
said that the bridge is on the 196th St right of way crossing Mill
Creek. He said if the bridge is torn down, access to Western
Processing will be off 72nd Ave. Wickstrom said we want to
demolish it and Western Processing will take care of the cleanup.
Committee unanimously agreed to the emergency demolition of the
bridge over Mill Creek.
Central Ave & Pioneer St Pedestrian Signal
Wickstrom stated that this is a signal pedestrian project on
Central & Pioneer by the Jr. High School, for which we were able to
get a grant in the amount of $27 , 000 . Wickstrom requested
authorization for the signing of the agreement and establishing the
budget for same. He stated that matching funds would come from the
James St Pedestrian Improvement.
Committee unanimously recommended authorization for signing the
agreement and establishing the budget for same.
In response to White, Lindell said the time-line on this would be
shortly after school begins.
Downtown Infrastructure Update
No comments on this item.
Royal Woods Manor - Bill of Sale
Committee unanimously agreed to approve the bill of sale.
4
there is $1 billion dollars of federal money around and only five
systems in the U. S. that it can be spent on. White asked if the
Regional Transit Authority is going to have input on that.
Wickstrom said he thinks it would go for grade separations and its
improving the rail for high speed trains running from Eugene,
Oregon to Vancouver B. C. Wickstrom said they want to get it above
125 mph and to do this they need grade separations. Wickstrom said
that knowing the money is out there and also we may not see it in
six years, we need to let people know we need some.
In response to White ' s question on S. 256th between 104th & 116th,
Wickstrom said that the County has received a grant and we are
waiting for them to make the improvement. Then we will be in a
better position to get a grant from TIB to fund it.
Commute Trip Reduction Program for City Employees
Gillissee explained that being a major employer of over 100 people,
we have to follow our own ordinance. He said that 90% of our
employees drive alone to work and we have to reduce that down to
72% by 1995 . In so doing, we need to provide some form of
encouragement and formal program in which we can effectively change
the way employees commute. Gillissee has put together a suggested
program of nine steps to be implemented. In response to White ' s
question on the monthly bus pass reimbursement, Gillissee said that
several companies are starting out their programs with 1/2 the cost
. of monthly bus pass reimbursement rathE,r than full reimbursement.
Regarding the adoption of the compressed work-week schedule,
Gillissee stated that nine 80 ' s have been suggested, rather than
four 101s. McCarthy said that if we go ahead with the compressed
work-week, he wants the schedules staggered so that no more than
25% of the people in any one department would take any one day off.
Gillissee said that his prepared plan indicates that State funding
provided for CTR, will provide resources needed to carry the
program through June 1994 . He said that this is really June of
193 . He said the first two years the funds received from the State
were a grant that could be used by the City for anything having to
do with CTR. However, starting in July of this year, it is no
longer a grant fund; it is an appropriation and part of the
provision of that is that it cannot be used by the City to fund the
program for their own employees specifically.
Committee unanimously approved the CTR Program.
High Capacity Transportation Grant
Wickstrom said that essentially this is establishing a budget for
a grant we have received in the amount of $37 , 000 . Wickstrom said
the total project is $46 , 250 and we need authorization to establish
3
Grant Fundinq
Wickstrom said we have been offered a T. I . B grant for approximately
$2 . 9 million and the project is approximately $3 . 6 million for
putting in HOV, sidewalks and street lighting along S . 212th, West
Valley Highway to SR 167 . He said that at this point we would like
to fund it and we have money budgeted along that route including a
small proposed L. I .D. and there is some money in the c. I . P for the
James St. and Central Ave. intersection improvement for 1994 , which
we would like to transfer to this project because we have the
grant. Wickstrom said that in subsequent years, we would budget
for Central & James. In response to White regarding the concerns
of the Bicycle Advisory Committee, Wickstrom said that ' s an issue
we will need to address. He said this will put sidewalks and
street lights in there plus widening with the reconstruction of the
pavement. He said a bike lane was considered there but that may be
a function of how big we can push the LID to. White would like to
see this done. Wickstrom said right now he is primarily concerned
with getting the grant thru.
Committee unanimously agreed to reallocate the $350 , 000 denoted in
the James & Central intersection project .
5
I
PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE
JULY 7, 1993
PRESENT: DON WICKSTROM ED WHITE
JIM WHITE KEVIN LINDELL
JIM BENNETT TIM LaPORTE
LEONA ORR KEN CHATWIN
TONY McCARTHY MR. & MRS. RUST
TOM BRUBAKER CHARLIE KIEFER
JACK SPENCER DAN IVANOFF
JOHN STREICH
(COMMITTEE MEMBER PAUL MANN ABSENT)
Overflow RV Parking
Glen Jewell stated that his RV group had suggested an overnight
rest area for RV' ers. He mentioned they had looked at the area
between S. 212th and S. 228th Street on the Green River Corridor
where there is a considerable amount of open space in that area to
park RV' s. Jewell said it is close to Van Doren' s Landing Park as
well as shopping areas. Jewell said his group proposed to maintain
the area as much as they could and felt that it would be an asset
to the City of Kent.
Leona Orr stated that this item was brought to the Public Safety
Meeting at her request and that Paul Mann agreed to bring it to
this committee. Orr said her one concern, however, was that the
original site suggested was between S. 4th Avenue and Willis Street
where there is a State right-of-way and that the State was not
terribly excited about that area being used. Orr noted that she
was told that truckers use that area to park their big rigs
overnight and wondered if it was okay for truckers, why wouldn't it
be okay for RV' s.
Ed White commented that it was more an issue of enforcement because
you never know when the truckers are going to be at that location
and that the State doesn't have the resources to continually check
the area.
Jim White questioned whether there would be any difficulties from
the City' s stand point from developing such a project along Russell
Road. Ed White proposed that staff meet with various groups and
take a look at several different areas . White also mentioned that
the Zoning Code states that anytime that an area is provided for
the maneuvering or storage of vehicles, it has to be paved. White
1
went on to say that if the City is going to provide this type of
service, is the City going to pave all these areas. White noted
that once the area was selected, and the sites were amenable to
this activity, we would then come to Council and if anything needed
to be changed such as the Zoning Code or an ordinance that would
allow this to happen, then we would have the information to take it
to the next step.
Orr and White were both in favor of finding a way to make this
project happen. (Bennett and Mann were absent. )
Chatwin noted from a Risk Management standpoint that he didn't have
any problems with the idea. Chatwin also stated that he spoke with
WCIA and they really didn't have any problem either with the
liability issue as long as the City complies with spacing
regulations and mark the spots. Chatwin mentioned that the Police
need to be made aware to enforce the parking and felt a time limit
should be placed on the vehicles so we are not faced with long-term
residency problem.
Update on Sidewalks - Sequoia & Park Orchard
Wickstrom stated that for the Sequoia School sidewalks a cost
estimate had been worked up on the proposed LID. Wickstrom stated
that we were proposing that the cost to improve the street with
curb, gutter, widening and street lights would be approximately
$120, 000. Wickstrom noted that the City proposed to split the
amount paying a 1/3 of it, then calculate the assessments and then
meet with various property owners. Wickstrom said that the City
has covenants representing about 80% of the properties involved,
but that the final word would be up to the Council . He went on to
say that the school ' s assessment is about $27 , 000 which is about
what it would cost them to improve their frontage in accordance
with the covenant which is just a deferral of their improvements.
Wickstrom estimated that sometime this month we would be meeting
with the property owners and then go back to Committee with the
results of the meeting.
Councilman White noted that he knew it was impossible to get the
project done before school begins, but urged that the City move to
get it done as soon as possible because of the safety issue.
As for Park Orchard sidewalks on 112th Avenue SE, Wickstrom stated
that the City felt we had resolved the issue several years back
when a plat went in the area and 112th was widened on the east side
and a 5-foot gravel shoulder was installed for pedestrians from
James Street to the plat. Wickstrom noted that when the LeBlanc
Garden's Condominiums went in, the City required them to put in
street frontage, widen the road and put in a gravel walkway all the
way up to the City limits at SE 232nd Street. Wickstrom said that
in the gap between LeBlanc Garden' s and the plat, the City had a
contract with the developer to install a storm sewer. The ditch
2
was then filled in and a gravel walkway installed. Wickstrom
mentioned that grass has grown around the gravel path to the point
where it probably doesn't look much like a walkway.
White noted that from LaBlanc Garden' s going south, if you stepped
off the pavement, you were in the ditch. Wickstrom stated that the
problem we have with the improvements on the east side is that we
only have a 40-foot right-of-way throughout most of that area with
the exception of the new developments that have occurred.
Wickstrom mentioned that with all the improvements on one side, you
could go from James to LeBlanc Garden' s on the east side (where we
have widened the road and put in a gravel path) , cross the street
at LeBlanc' s, and go to the end of the street on the sidewalk and
path that was installed on the west side. Wickstrom further stated
that to do anything else, the City would have to acquire right-of-
way now from various parcels. As an option, he suggested that the
City could go back and spruce up the gravel path to make it more
dominate so people could recognize it.
White stated that eventually the City would have to put in
sidewalks there, however, Wickstrom noted that it would be costly
because the right-of-way is only 40 feet and we have very few LID
covenants along that road to put in sidewalks. Wickstrom mentioned
that even if the money was pulled out from what was budgeted for
all the repair work being done downtown, we still would not have
the kind of money necessary to acquire the right-of-ways and then
build in the widening.
Public Improvements (Sidewalks)
Councilwoman Orr stated that she had a real safety concern when we
continue to allow development and we provide gravel walkways which
become overgrown with grass. Orr made note of the fact that SE
248th Street has become an extremely hazardous street in certain
areas because of the new school. Orr continued to say that there
is some money set aside for LID' s in the future, but given the time
frame up to 10 years to do so, it just did not make sense to her
anymore. Orr further stated that if the Committee was in
agreement, the City could take a look at our policy that allows the
10 year span and find some way to shorten it up so that when a new
development goes in, they don't get 10 years before they have to
comply with sidewalk improvements. Orr felt that it would be
cheaper to install sidewalks at the time of development rather than
waiting 10 years. Orr also noted that if we require sidewalks of
single-family homes/developments, which certainly affects the cost
and affordability, she felt the same should be done with multi-
family developments.
Jim White stated that he was in agreement, and mentioned that in
the Sequoia Jr. High area at 112th Avenue SE, the City is having to
go back and retrofit. White said in some cases the LID' s are
there, but we need to start pulling in some of the covenants that
3
we have in that area. Orr stated along the same line, that the
traffic light at SE 240th and 108th Avenue SE is another example of
where the City failed because the light should have been put in at
the time the street was widened and the developments were opened
for occupancy.
Orr mentioned that hundreds of apartment units were built shortly
before the street was widened and felt that it probably would have
been cheaper to put a light in at that time. Orr said, in the mean
time, suddenly the City is saying we are going to go back and put
the light in, but it always seems like we are doing it after the
fact. Orr felt that the City really needs to take a real long,
hard, look at that and start doing sidewalk improvements up front.
Orr further explained that when we increase density and housing and
allow the volume of cars that density brings, then we should do
something at the time. Orr stated that we have commitments of
money to do so at the time of construction and that maybe the last
two or three developments should have paid the whole cost. Orr
stated that when you are doing a $5, 000, 000 or $6, 000, 000 apartment
project, $30, 000 or $40, 000 as their share of a traffic light
should be able to be worked into their construction budget.
Brubaker explained that the City had the authority to require a "No
Protest" LID Agreement as a condition of development on sidewalks
and other street improvements, but by law we are required to give
a limit to that agreement, effective up to 10 years. Wickstrom
said that the maximum is 10 years, but we could invoke them anytime
within 30 days notice during that 10 year period.
Jim White suggested that we start with the above areas mentioned
(SE 248th Street) and work it through and see what the work plan is
to make something happen. However, White did mention that he was
not uncomfortable with using LID' s, but that we do the "No Protest"
Agreements and he felt that the annexation that we are going
through on East Hill is a good example, when we find out after a
few years that some of these aren't worthwhile. White stated that
if folks want the service, then they should annex to the City and
if the developers are going to build then they should build the
sidewalks.
Wickstrom noted that in the Transportation Plan we are including'
the sidewalk element that will show where the existing sidewalks
are and hopefully show where the needs are so we can prioritize
where we want to address them.
Wickstrom stated that perhaps a resolution should be prepared
stating that sidewalks should be installed - the preferred method
would be to have sidewalks installed as far as development is
concerned. This resolution would be amending Ordinance #2224 or
have some Council action showing that sidewalks should be
constructed in conjunction with the development of the property.
4
Brubaker will prepare a draft resolution for the next Public Works
meeting.
116th Avenue SE Road Improvements - Bid opening (277th St Corridor)
Wickstrom explained that we had executed an agreement with the
developer of Lindental plat at 116th Ave which is part of the 277th
Street Corridor improvement. He stated that there are several
different plats and none of them fit with what we would need as
part of the corridor. Wickstrom said that Council authorized and
executed an agreement with one of the plat developers who had final
platted and road plans approved. We would essentially build 116th
and the developer would contribute funds to that. Wickstrom stated
that the project is advertised now and the timing is such that we
would miss the Public Works Committee meeting and we are committed
to get this road improvement in so that the developer can get on
with his development. Wickstrom requested authorization to go
directly to Council for award, as long as the low bid received is
within budget.
Committee unanimously approved placement of this item on the July
20th Council agenda, provided the low bid is within budget.
S 196th/5. 200th Corridor - Resolution
(Bicycle Advisory Committee)
Brubaker stated that John Striech requested that he draft a
resolution for the City' s consideration regarding construction of
a bicycle path on 196th/200th Corridor. Brubaker said he did not
draft the resolution because he had a discussion with Tim LaPorte
and it is his understanding that there are some bike paths that are
being constructed as part of that project.
LaPorte explained that as part of this corridor project currently
there are plans to extend bike paths from 200th & Orillia to Frager
& Russell Road including a full bicycle interchange. LaPorte said
that there have been some discussions on going further easterly to
West Valley Highway. LaPorte said that the middle section of the
project extends from West Valley Highway to East Valley Highway;
the constraint is actually on the easterly reach of that where we
go through the Kingsport Industrial Center, where short of
condemning warehouses we don't have sufficient room for a bicycle
path which is 10 ' total width. LaPorte further stated that we are
hoping to put in a bike path between West Valley Highway and
Interurban Trails. In response to Jim White, LaPorte stated that
we are not proposing to have a bike path on the high level bridge.
He said we are proposing to extend the bike path at grade, from
West Valley Highway to the Interurban Trail. Jim White asked that
if we are going to do a grade separation, could we do a bike path
under the bridge? LaPorte stated that there would probably be some
5
liabilities involved with additional crossing of the railroad.
John Streich stated that he would like some input into the design
of the project. Streich will be in contact with LaPorte on this
issue.
Segregation Request - LID 327 & LID 330
Wickstrom stated that this is a parcel in Van Doren ' s Landing that
Birtcher Frank Properties wants to sell. As a result, they have to
segregate out the assessments for these two projects on this parcel
so they can pay off that assessment.
Brubaker said typically we would go before Council with the
segregations approved and the City Attorney is directed to draw up
the necessary ordinance. However, because of time constraints,
Birtcher has asked that we have the ordinance prepared at the
meeting so that if it is approved, the ordinance can be passed.
Committee unanimously approved placement of the Segregation Request
on LID 327 & LID 330 on the July loth Council agenda and that the
City Attorney prepare the necessary ordinance for acceptance.
Six Year T. I.P. Plan - Set Hearing Date
Wickstrom stated that we plan to bring the Six Year Plan to the
next committee meeting. He said it is due back to the State by the
end of July however, we won't make that date. Wickstrom said that
we need to set a hearing date at the first Council meeting in
August.
Committee unanimously approved setting the hearing for the Six Year
TIP Plan at the next Council meeting.
McCarthy asked if this is tied in with what the C. I.P. is going to
be requesting. He said that we will be having a public hearing on
the C. I.P. that same night and asked if projects which are listed
in the C. I.P. are the same ones we have on the T. I.P. list.
Wickstrom stated that they are, however we load up the Six Year
Plan in order to secure grants. Wickstrom also stated that what we
have in the C. I.P. is quite a bit less than what we show in the Six'
Year Plan.
Horseshoe Acres Pump Station - Acceptance
Committee unanimously recommended acceptance of the Horseshoe Acres
Pump Station as complete.
Truck Mounted Sewer & Catch Basin Cleaner
Wickstrom stated that we received several bids however the low bids
were non-responsive in that they didn 't meet the specifications and
6
we are recommending that the bids submitted by Sahlberg Equipment
and Seattle Crane be rejected as being non-responsive and that the
bid in the amount of $129 , 000 plus tax, be awarded to Pacific
Utilities for the 1993 Peabody Meyers Vactor be accepted.
Wickstrom said that this bid is within budget.
Committee unanimously recommended acceptance of the bid submitted
by Pacific Utilities in the amount of $129 , 000 plus tax.
Green River Trail
Wickstrom said there are two little dips in the levee along the
golf course north of Meeker St. that we are raising and that ' s
where we are applying for a Shoreline Management permit.
Wickstrom said that we are still in the design phase. We are
trying to design that last small section under the bridge; we have
to raise the levee 3 ' feet in that area and we have a 15 ' clearance
with the bridge so we are having the consultant do a retaining wall
along the curve. Wickstrom said once that is done, we will be out
to bid.
Meeting adjourned at 6: 25 PM.
7