HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Meeting - Council - Agenda - 06/01/1993 City of Kent
Colt Councoll Meeting
Agenda
CITY OF JJN
4T
�T4
y `
Mayor Dan Kelleher
Council Members
Judy Woods, President
Jim Bennett Paul Mann
Christi Houser Leona Orr
Jon Johnson Jim White
June 1 , 1993
Office of the City Clerk
CITY OF ��ZSV�
SUMMARY AGENDA
KENT CITY COUNCIL MEETING
June 1, 1993
Council Chambers
7 : 00 p.m.
MAYOR: Dan Kelleher COUNCILMEMBERS: Judy Woods, President
Jim Bennett Christi Houser Jon Johnson
Paul Mann Leona Orr Jim White
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
1. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
,A. Employee of the Month
Regional Justice Center Update
Computer Rail Update
j (v3 2 . PUBLIC 111EAZ�vRINGS
None
3 . CO ENT CALENDAR
Minutes
�B: Bills Water System Plan - Resolution13� �
IS 1993 Jail Health Services Contract
Safety Belt Education/Information Grant
�F. Unfunded Federal Mandates - Resolution 13
Offsite Overflow Parking Resolution 13 �, 3
If. Kent Cornucopia Days - Ordinance 311 J
Ramstead/Schneider Annexation - Authorization to Sign
Petition
,�J. Traffic Signal Remodel - 228th & 84th & SR 167 Ramps -
Accept as Complete
/K 1992-93 Growth Management Act Grant - Service Agreement
with King County - Resolution 13(0`/
,,L' Human Services Commission Appointment
4 . OTHER BUSINESS
�K. 272/277 Corridor - Road Improvement Agreement
1) 116 Ave/Lindental Meadows
2) 116 Ave/Julie' s Addition
5 . BIDS
Highway Paint Striper
6 . CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS
7 . REPORTS
EXECUTIVE SESSION - Labor Negotiations
8 . ADJOURNMENT
NOTE: A copy of the full agenda packet is available for perusal in the city
Clerk' s office and the Kent Library.
An explanation of the agenda format is given on the back of this page.
PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
Citizens wishing to address the Council will, at this time,
make known the subject of interest, so all may be properly
heard.
/ A) mployee of the Month
B) Regional Justice Center Update
L
i
C) Commuter Rail Up e
og u
CONSENT CALENDAR
3 . City Council Action:
E ai'amember move r. mem er --
sr� _n- that Consent Calendar Items A through L be approved. (�iw
4-L Cesyv CU Cfj Cw-
Discussion jAo
Action Y V 0 V U
3A. Approval of Minutes.
Approval of the minutes of the regular Council meeting of
May 18 , 1993 .
3B. Approval of Bills.
Approval of payment of the bills received through May 28 , 1993
Cam, after auditing by the Operations Committee at its meeting on
d� June 1, 1993 .
Approval of checks issued for vouchers:
Date Check Numbers Amount
Approval of checks issued for payroll:
Date Check Numbers Amount
Council Agenda
Item No. 3 A-B
Kent, Washington
May 18 , 1993
Regular meeting of the Kent City Council was called to order at
7 : 00 p.m. by Mayor Dan Kelleher. Present: Councilmembers
Bennett, Houser, Johnson, Mann, Orr and White, Chief Administra-
tive Officer McCarthy, City Attorney Lubovich, Planning Director
Harris, Public Works Director Wickstrom, Fire Chief Angelo and
Human Resources Director Olson. Council President Woods was
excused from the meeting. Approximately 35 people were in
attendance.
PUBLIC Exchange Student. Mayor Kelleher introduced
COMMUNICATIONS Sarah Plouff, a student at Kentwood High School
who is active in a student exchange program with
Japan. He noted that Ms. Plouff is a Student
Ambassador and will leave Seattle for Japan on
August 9th, and that the trip will cost approxi-
mately $1, 995 . Ms. Plouff said that she has
studied Business and Japanese, and would like a
career in international trade. She added that
she will be working at the University of
Washington this summer as an interpreter for the
Mayor of Kobe. She noted that she has raised
over half of the money needed for her trip, and
that she would appreciate any donations .
Commuter Rail Update. Julie Rodwell, Project
Coordinator for Metro, stated that $25, 000, 000 in
Federal funding has been authorized for this
project, and that State and local funding will be
sought next year. She noted that an interlocal
agreement is needed between the City and Metro
regarding station site selection, safety, grade
crossings, grade separations, track speed and so
forth. She also noted that there will be an item
on the ballot regarding funding for a bus system
that will feed the rail system. Rodwell said
Metro is working with Kent to develop a brochure
on this issue, and would like to hear from
Council, citizens, committees, and anyone with
input. She agreed with the Mayor that repre-
sentatives from Metro and the City should work
together on issues such as parking at the
Regional Justice Center and other facilities, to
minimize expenditures for both.
CONSENT WHITE MOVED that Consent Calendar Items A
CALENDAR through Q be approved. Johnson seconded and the
motion carried.
MINUTES (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3A)
Approval of the Minutes. APPROVAL of the minutes
of the regular Council meeting of May 4 , 1993 .
1
May 18 , 1993
HEALTH & (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3K)
SANITATION Hill Building 80-A. ACCEPTANCE of the bill of
sale and warranty agreement submitted by Hill-
Raaum Investment Company for continuous operation
and maintenance of 815 feet of water main
extension and release of bonds after expiration
of the maintenance period. The project is
located at 18506 Both Place S. , as recommended by
the Public Works Committee.
WATER (PUBLIC HEARINGS - ITEM 2A)
Water Conservation Plan. This date has been set
for the public hearing on the proposed Water
Conservation Plan. This proposed plan. is to be
incorporated into the City' s adopted Water System
Plan as an amendment.
Robyn Bartelt, Conservation Specialist, noted
that formal approval of Kent's Water Comprehen-
sive Plan by King County is contingent upon
having a water conservation element, and that
this proposed plan follows the guidelines
prepared by the Department of Ecology, the
Department of Health, and the Washington Water
Utilities Council. She noted that the goal is a
reduction of 6 . 5% by 1995, and 8 . 0% by 2000 . She
noted that the plan will improve efficient
delivery of water, reduce the amount of water
wasted in the delivery process, increase the
available water supply, coordinate and support
services and programs with adjacent water
purveyors, reduce peak daily consumption, reduce
total annual consumption, and develop public
awareness and education. She noted that high-
lights of the plan include public education,
technical assistance, system measures, and
incentives and requirements. She added that the
costs of the plan will be incorporated into the
1994 budget and financed through the City' s water
fund. She noted for White that population growth
was factored in when determining the amount of
water reduction. Upon a question from Paul
Morford Bartelt said that water rates will not be
increased, and Wickstrom explained that growth in
the water utility revenues will compensate. The
Mayor opened the public hearing. There were no
comments from the audience and WHITE MOVED to
close the public hearing. Orr seconded and the
motion carried. WHITE THEN MOVED that the City
2
May 18 , 1993
WATER Attorney be directed to prepare the appropriate
ordinance or resolution for the adoption of the
Water Conservation Plan as an amendment to the
city' s adopted Water System Plan. Houser
seconded and the motion carried.
SIDEWALKS (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3J)
LID 342 - Smith Street Sidewalks. ADOPTION of
Ordinance No. 3114 creating LID 342 for the
installation of sidewalks along Smith Street from
West Valley Highway to 64th Avenue S. , as dis-
cussed at the City Council meeting of May 4 ,
1993 .
CONSTRUCTION (OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4C)
STANDARDS Public Works Construction Standards. At the last
Council meeting on May 4 , the Council adopted the
City' s newly revised Public Works Construction
Standards. Since that time, some technical
corrections have been made to these standards.
The Public Works Department now requests adoption
of these standards, including the recent techni-
cal amendments. The City Attorney noted that a
new ordinance has been prepared to replace the
ordinance in the agenda packet. Assistant City
Attorney Brubaker distributed copies of the new
ordinance and explained that after review of the
public comments received after the public hear-
ing, they determined that additional discretion
should be given to the Director of Public Works.
He noted that the changes made were changing the
word "shall" to "should" , changing the word
"must" to "may" , and so forth. He noted that an
explanatory proviso was added to the first
section of the Standards to provide a clear
statement of the purpose and effect. Paul
Morford complimented the people who reviewed the
Standards.
CONSTRUCTION WHITE MOVED that Ordinance No. 3117 adopting the
STANDARDS newly revised Public Works Standards be adopted.
Bennett seconded and the motion carried.
COMMUTER RAIL (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3L)
Commuter Rail System. ADOPTION of Resolution No.
1356 relating to Commuter Rail System, as recom-
mended by the Public Works Committee,
3
May 18 , 1993
CRITICAL AREAS/ (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3C)
WETLANDS Critical Areas/Wetlands. ADOPTION of Critical
Areas/Wetlands Ordinance No. 3109 (ZCA-91-3) , as
approved by the City Council on April 20, 1993 .
(CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3D)
Amendment to Comprehensive Plan Policies/
Critical Areas. ADOPTION of Critical Areas
Resolution No. 1354 (CPA-91-1) which amends the
Comprehensive Plan as approved by the City
Council on April 20, 1993 .
REZONE (OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4D)
Venture 84 Rezone. Ordinance No. 3100 was passed
by the City Council on April 20, 1993 . Because
the exhibit attached thereto transposed Parcels A
and B, and incorrectly identified the property,
it is necessary to enact a new ordinance amending
the official zoning map of the City of Kent to
rezone the property. It is located on the west
side of 84th Ave. So. , approximately 390 ft.
north of South 222nd St. and is more specifically
identified as the western 445 ft. of Parcel
No. 7759800041. The City Attorney noted that
Ordinance No. 3100 properly identified the parcel
but that the applicant transposed the parcels on
the exhibits. ORR MOVED to adopt Ordinance
No. 3118 rezoning certain property located on the
west side of 84th Avenue South approximately 390 '
north of South 222nd Street, and repealing
Ordinance No. 3100 . White seconded and the
motion carried.
ANNEXATIONS (OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4E)
Interim Potential Annexation Areas. The proposed
resolution would adopt an Interim Potential
Annexation Area, as recommended by the Planning
Committee. Planning Director Harris noted that
the Council has adopted a Potential Growth Area,
and that they must also adopt a Potential
Annexation Area. He showed a map of the area as
approved by the Planning Committee, and noted
that it is almost the same as the growth boundary
approved earlier. He explained that other cities
cannot infringe on the annexation areas. He
stated that people must still petition the City
to annex, and that the City will work with the
County to set up meetings in the potential
4
May 18 , 1993
ANNEXATIONS annexation areas so that residents are aware that
the City is considering annexing that area in the
future. ORR MOVED to approve Resolution No. 1360
adopting an Interim Potential Annexation Area.
White seconded and the motion carried.
PERMIT PROCESS (OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4F)
Permit Process Direction. As discussed at the
Council Workshop of April 26, 1993 , Resolution
No. 1348 (adopted by the Council on March 16 ,
1993) is being brought back to the Council for
reconfirmation or modification. Only four
Councilmembers were able to attend the workshop,
so no direction was given at the meeting. If
Council so desires, Administration is prepared to
implement the resolution as written within the
time frames stated. Administration ' s proposal is
included in the agenda packet, as well as the
proposal provided by Councilmember Jon Johnson.
Chief Administrative Officer McCarthy noted that
Administration recommends that the original
report as proposed by the Mayor' s Advisory
Committee be adopted. He explained that it would
be implemented as follows : 1) Council would
give authorization to establish an Office of
Development Permits and Inspections from the
existing staff of the Building section of the
Code Enforcement Division of the Fire Department,
and the Office would report to Administration;
2) the Fire Prevention section of the Code
Enforcement Division of the Fire Department would
be combined with the Training Division of the
Fire Department, and Assistant Chief Berg would
be assigned to head that new Prevention and
Training Division, filling the position left
vacant by Assistant Chief Kearns; 3) an engineer-
architect would be selected to fill the slot
vacated by Assistant Chief Berg.
MANN MOVED to accept and adopt the original
Mayor 's Committee recommendations and to direct
the City Attorney to prepare the required ordi-
nance. Bennett seconded. Orr voiced concern
about the effect of combining the Fire Prevention
and the Training Division on the Fire Department,
and of taking a person from Public Works to head
the new office. The Mayor and McCarthy clarified
that the recommendation is to hire the person in
5
May 18 , 1993
PERMIT PROCESS charge of the new office from outside. Fire
Chief Angelo said that because of staff
shortages, they are not able to provide all the
training they should. He said that the two divi-
sions would have to remain separated physically
and that it would be impossible for one person to
operate both. He pointed out that he has tried
to pull staff together to minimize the cost of
operation, but that this would leave Fire Preven-
tion, Hazardous Materials, Disaster Management
and Arson Investigation without any support unit
to answer phones and do support work. He
' informed the Council that if this is combined in
the way presented, public safety would be com-
promised in regard to training for firefighters
and in the ability to carry out functions in
other areas. He voiced concern that they would
become ineffectual in many areas because of the
short staff, and said he hopes for an opportunity
to submit a plan that would allow both units to
function with a chief officer in Fire Prevention
and a chief officer in Training. He said that by
being allowed to assign that, to utilize funds
from vacant positions, and to fill some posi-
tions, he could cover the existing services and
make some progress in training.
MANN MOVED to amend his motion to incorporate the
Fire Chief ' s concerns and that as much as possi-
ble be done to alleviate his fears with regard to
safety. Bennett accepted the amendment. The
Mayor noted that it would be appropriate for
Chief Angelo to develop a scenario including
budget suggestions and submit it to Adminis-
tration. White opined that this is not a policy
decision, but an administrative decision.
Johnson spoke against the motion, noting that it
does not meet the intent of Council ' s resolution,
that it will cost money to implement, that
inspectors and plan review people are needed
rather than managers, that public safety would be
compromised, and that it would centralize
Administration. He offered a substitute motion
to move the organization of the Building Depart-
ment and the permit function in the Planning
Department into the Construction Division of the
Public Works Department. Orr seconded. The
motion to substitute failed with only, Johnson and
Orr in favor.
6
May 18 , 1993
PERMIT PROCESS Orr voiced concern about hiring from the outside,
and said she does not believe the permitting
process should be in the hands of an elected
official. She noted that there are employees who
are well educated in code enforcement, zoning
regulations, safety issues, hazardous materials,
and so forth. She said that that having this
department report to Administration takes it out
- of the hands of the people who should be in
charge. Johnson said that putting the Building
Department under Administration defies management
principles, and that the morale of the employees
should be considered. He added that this will
not speed up the permit process or save money.
Bennett explained that all complaints come
directly to Administration and this would provide
them an opportunity to deal with them. He agreed
with White that the Council should not be in-
volved in this, and said the real issue is
service to the community, not staff morale.
MANN offered as an amendment to his motion that
the new organization be re-evaluated at the end
of the year, and that at that time the new admin-
istration would determine if further modification
or direction is needed. Bennett agreed to the
amendment. White noted that this is an interim
measure designed to streamline and improve the
process, that it need not be political, and that
he is dedicated to seeing that the public is
better served.
The motion to accept and adopt the original
Mayor' s Committee recommendation, to direct the
City Attorney to prepare the required ordinance,
to take whatever steps are possible to accom-
modate the Fire Chief ' s concerns, and to
re-evaluate the new organization at the end of
the year then carried with Orr and Johnson
opposed.
VALLEY (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3E)
COMMUNICATIONS Valley Com Interlocal Agreement Addendum.
ADOPTION of Resolution No. 1355, authorizing the
execution of an addendum to the existing Valley
Com Interlocal Agreement. The legal wording for
the agreement was recently reviewed in light of
the upcoming implementation of the County-wide
800 MHz Public Safety Radio System. The addendum
7
May 18 , 1993
VALLEY simply clarifies language to match the intent and
COMMUNICATIONS past practice of Valley Communications to hold
property and enter into agreements with other
parties. This is of particular importance in
enabling Valley Communications to receive funds
from the King County 800 MHz radio levy.
YOUTH CENTER (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 30)
Project Lighthouse & Rent Youth Center. ADOPTION
of Resolution No. 1359 , endorsing the collabora-
tive efforts of Project Lighthouse and the City
of Kent to provide comprehensive services and
resources to the adolescent youth of the Kent
area, as recommended by the Parks Committee.
(CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3P)
Youth Center - Planning & Design. AUTHORIZATION
to proceed with a request for proposal from
architectural firms interested in bidding on the
planning and architectural design for the
development of a community youth center, as
recommended by the Parks Committee.
CITY (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3F)
REGULATIONS civil Violations Enforcement & Abatement.
ADOPTION of Ordinance No. 3110 adding a new
chapter to the Kent City Code, Chapter 1. 04 ,
entitled "Civil Violations, Enforcement and
Abatement" , as recommended by the Operations,
Planning, and Public Works Committees. This
ordinance establishes a single procedure for
enforcing civil violations of certain code
provisions making reference to this chapter and
establishes a process to obtain compliance of
code violations and for abatement of the
violation, if necessary.
(CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3G)
Public Nuisances. ADOPTION of Ordinance No. 3111
amending Chapter 8 . 04 of the Kent City Code
relating to litter control by repealing a section
relating to abatement, and by providing for civil
penalties and further repealing Chapter 8 . 01 of
the Kent City Code regarding public nuisances
and adding a new chapter to be titled "Public
Nuisances" , as recommended by the Operations
Committee. This ordinance updates types of
nuisances and provides for enforcement of
nuisance violations through Chapter 1. 04 , Civil
Violations, Enforcement and Abatement.
8
May 18, 1993
CITY (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3H)
REGULATIONS Disposition of Junk Vehicles. ADOPTION of
Ordinance No. 3112 adding a new chapter to the
Kent City Code, Chapter 8 . 08, entitled "Junk
Vehicles" , as recommended by the Operations
Committee. This ordinance provides procedures
for the removal of junk vehicles as authorized by
RCW 46 . 55 . 240 as public nuisances. Enforcement
of this chapter is through Chapter 1 . 04 , Civil
Violations, Enforcement and Abatement.
(CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3I)
Weeds & Vegetation. ADOPTION of Ordinance
No. 3113 adding a new chapter to the Kent City
Code entitled "Weeds and Vegetation" identifying
certain conditions of vegetation as public
nuisances, and providing procedures for removal
of vegetation constituting public nuisances, as
recommended by the Operations and Public Works
Committees . This ordinance also provides that
enforcement of this chapter is through Chapter
1. 04 of the Kent City Code, Civil Violations,
Enforcement and Abatement.
PARKS & (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3M)
RECREATION Metro Shoreline Improvement Grant Funds.
ADOPTION of Resolution No. 1357 authorizing the
Parks Department to apply for Metro Shoreline
Improvement Grant funds to acquire and develop
Riverview Park, as recommended by the Parks
Committee.
(CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3N)
Ring County Conservation Futures Funding.
ADOPTION of Resolution No. 1358 authorizing the
Parks Department to apply for King County
Conservation Futures funding to acquire property
in Upper Mill Creek Canyon and to acquire
Riverview Park, as recommended by the Parks
Committee.
COUNCIL (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3Q)
Council Absence. APPROVAL of a request from
Council President Woods for an excused absence
from tonight ' s meeting due to illness.
9
May 18 , 1993
FINANCE (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3B)
Approval of Bills. APPROVAL of payment of the
bills received through May 14, 1993 after
auditing by the Operations Committee at its
meeting on May 18 , 1993 .
Approval of checks issued for vouchers:
Date Check Numbers Amount
5/1-5/15 130328/130800 $1, 665, 044 . 22
Approval of checks issued for payroll :
Date Check Numbers Amount
5/20/93 Checks 183439-183881 $ 297 , 322 . 03
Advice 6758-7067 366 , 183 . 03
$ 633 , 505 . 06
(OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4A)
Refunding of 1980 1986 and 1990 Voted Bonds -
Bond Ordinance & Purchase Contract. The Opera-
tions Committee has recommended that Council
adopt a bond ordinance and authorize the Mayor to
sign a purchase contract with Lehman Brothers for
approximately $14, 638 , 550 to refinance the call-
able portion ($12 , 755 , 000) of the 1980, 1986 and
1990 Voted Bonds. The true interest cost will be
approximately 5 . 44 percent which will save the
City approximately $470 , 000 in present value debt
service. The refinancing will allow a property
tax reduction of approximately $. 15 per thousand
of assessed valuation, saving the owner of a
$100, 000 home approximately $14 . 95 per year in
property tax.
Acting Finance Director Miller noted that the
City has maintained their bond rating of Al and
A+ even with the economic downturn. She in-
troduced the City' s underwriter, Dick King.
Mr. King then noted that the amount has been
reduced from $14 , 638 , 550 to $14 , 085, 000 which
will generate total debt service savings over the
next seventeen years of $815 , 000, which
translates to a net present value savings of
$589 , 659 .
10
May 18 , 1993
FINANCE HOUSER MOVED to adopt Bond Ordinance No. 3115 and
to authorize the Mayor to sign a purchase con-
tract with Lehman Brothers. Orr seconded and the
motion carried.
(OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4B)
Refunding of 1978 and 1989 Councilmanic Bonds.. -
Bond Ordinance and Purchase Contract. The
Operations Committee has recommended that Council
adopt a bond ordinance and authorize the Mayor to
sign a purchase contract with Lehman Brothers for
approximately $2 , 740, 000 to refinance the call-
able portion ($2 , 495 , 000) of the 1978 and 1989
Councilmanic Bonds . The true interest cost will
be approximately 5 . 29 percent which will save the
City approximately $94 , 000 in present value debt
service. The savings can be used to finance
future Capital Improvements which will be identi-
fied in the 1994-1999 Capital Improvement Plan
update.
Dick King of Shearson Lehman Brothers, Inc. ,
noted that the total debt service savings as
estimated earlier at $98 , 500 will actually be
near $111, 000, and that the net present value
savings will be $103 , 570 . HOUSER MOVED to adopt
Bond Ordinance No. 3116 and to authorize the
Mayor to sign a purchase contract with Lehman
Brothers. Orr seconded and the motion carried.
REPORTS Operations Committee. Houser noted that the
meeting time of the Committee may be changed and
that more information will be available at the
next Council meeting.
Planning Committee. Orr distributed an agenda
for a day-long workshop on Capital Facilities
Planning, Concurrency, and Impact Fees under the
Growth Management Act. She noted that the
workshop will be held on Tuesday, June 8th, in
Engineering Conference Room #3 . She invited and
encouraged Councilmembers to attend.
Administrative Reports. McCarthy reminded the
Council that July 30 is the last day to notify
the County of any ballot issues for the November
2nd general election.
11
May 18 , 1993
REPORTS He noted that negotiations with SSMD are going
well, that the transition date is June 1, and
that the City Attorney will soon distribute a
draft contract.
McCarthy suggested conducting a workshop on
June 1 at 5 : 30 p.m. on the downtown parking
study.
EXECUTIVE At 8 : 15 , he announced an executive session
SESSION regarding labor negotiations.
ADJOURNMENT At 8 : 35 p.m. the meeting reconvened and
adjourned.
Brenda Jacob r, MC
City Clerk
12
\ �)lY Kent City Council Meeting
v Date June 1, 1993
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: WATER CONSERVATION PLAN (WATER SYSTEM PLAN
T]ESe UT-1-ON
AMENDMENT) m...�,-�-----�
2 . SUMMARY TATEMENT: AS rQGQMMQieus G •} G --��-1
, doption of Resolution No / relating to the Water
Conservation Plan. The adoption of a Water Conservation Plan
is required by the South King County Coordinated Water System
Plan, a regional plan for critical water supply areas in South
King County (including the City of Kent) required by state law.
3 . EXHIBITS: Memorandum from Public Works Director, Water
Conservation Plan 1993 and resolution
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (3-0 vote)
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION•
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 3C
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
APRIL 14, 1993
TO: PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE
FROM: DON WICKSTROMIIA )
RE: WATER CONSERVATION PLAN
Attached you will find the City of Kent ' s Water n Co County ion Pour
lan
and budget impact. Formal approval by g
Comprehensive Plan is tied to the development of this Water
Conservation Plan.
Previous City Council action adopted the King County Resolution
establishing the conservation goals but achieve King
County goa requires
City
an
actual plan on how we are going
to Cof Water Conservation Plan will meet the ountytand the South King County Coordinated Water rSystem Planing
As noted, the attached indicate the implementation/costs of this
plan. It is proposed said costs to be incorporated into the
for
budget. Actual adoption of this would be by
which a draft thereof will be available at the meeting. The Public
Works Department recommends adoption of this Plan.
ACTION: Recommends adoption of the Water Conservation Plan and
incorporating it as part of- the city ' s adopted Water System Plan.
Bartelt stated that she feels that public education
still b that t as
one of
the key areas to reach the public.
recommended by the Public Works Dept. we need to adopt the plan by
ordinance. Brubaker asked the Committee if they wish to move
forward on this plan, he will draft an ordinance
and include it in
the packet for the next Council meeting, May
inance adopting the
Wateit.tee dire I Conservation
onservati d Bruplanbaseantel menu' of_nthedC ty , s Comprehensive
Water Con
Water Plan.
Bennett made a comment at this time stating that the small change
theater was an excellent idea. Bennett also made a comment
relative to the pressure reduction paragraph in the plan ating
that he is concerned with the lowering of pressure because
most
fire mains are built to a minimum standard without an extra
"cushion" . Gill explained that we have a computerized model of our
water system that we use thru CH2M Hill . Thru this model we can do
a very in-depth analysis as to what a system can deliver for fire
is a primary element in the design of our entire
protection. This
water system.
In. response to McCarthy, Bartelt stated that the quarterly
newsletter would be going out with. the utility bills . In response
to Bennett, Bartelt said the budget for this comes out -of the water
utility fund. --- - -- - - - - -
May 18 , 1993
HEALTH & (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3K)
SANITATION Hill Building 80-A. ACCEPTANCE of the bill of
sale and warranty agreement submitted by Hill-
Raaum Investment Company for continuous operation
and maintenance of 815 feet of water main
extension and release of bonds after expiration
of the maintenance period. The project is
located at 18506 80th Place S. , as recommended by
the Public Works Committee.
WATER (PUBLIC HEARINGS - ITEM 2A)
Water Conservation Plan. This date has been set
for the public hearing on the proposed Water
Conservation Plan. This proposed plan is to be
incorporated into the City' s adopted Water System
Plan as an amendment.
Robyn Bartelt, Conservation Specialist, noted
that formal approval of Kent ' s Water Comprehen-
sive Plan by King County is contingent upon
having a water conservation element, and that
this proposed plan follows the guidelines
prepared by the Department of Ecology, the
Department of Health, and the Washington Water
Utilities Council. She noted that the goal is a
reduction of 6 . 5% by 1995, and 8 . 0% by 2000. She
noted that the plan will improve efficient
delivery of water, reduce the amount of water
wasted in the delivery process, increase the
available water supply, coordinate and support
services and programs with adjacent water
purveyors, reduce peak daily consumption, reduce
total annual consumption, and develop public
awareness and education. She noted that high-
lights of the plan include public education,
technical assistance, system measures, and
incentives and requirements. She added that the
costs of the plan will be incorporated into the
1994 budget and financed through the City' s water
fund. She noted for White that population growth
was factored in when determining the amount of
water reduction. Upon a question from Paul
Morford Bartelt said that water rates will not be
increased, and Wickstrom explained that growth in
the water utility revenues will compensate. The
Mayor opened the public hearing. There were no
comments from the audience and WHITE MOVED to
close the public hearing. Orr seconded and the
motion carried. WHITE THEN MOVED that the City
2
May 18, 1993
WATER Attorney be directed to prepare the appropriate
ordinance or resolution for the adoption of the
Water Conservation Plan as an amendment to the
City's adopted Water System Plan. Houser
seconded and the motion carried.
SIDEWALKS (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3J)
LID 342 - Smith Street Sidewalks. ADOPTION of
Ordinance No. 3114 creating LID 342 for the
installation of sidewalks along Smith Street from
West Valley Highway to 64th Avenue S. , as dis-
cussed at the City Council meeting of May 4 ,
1993 .
CONSTRUCTION (OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4C)
STANDARDS Public Works Construction Standards. At the last
Council meeting on May 4 , the Council adopted the
City' s newly revised Public Works Construction
Standards. Since that time, some technical
corrections have been made to these standards.
The Public Works Department now requests adoption
of these standards, including the recent techni-
cal amendments. The City Attorney noted that a
new ordinance has been prepared to replace the
ordinance in the agenda packet. Assistant City
Attorney Brubaker distributed copies of the new
ordinance and explained that after review of the
public comments received after the public hear-
ing, they determined that additional discretion
should be given to the Director of Public Works.
He noted that the changes made were changing the
word "shall" to "should" , changing the word
"must" to "may" , and so forth. He noted that an
explanatory proviso was added to the first
section of the Standards to provide a clear
statement of the purpose and effect. Paul
Morford complimented the people who reviewed the
Standards.
CONSTRUCTION WHITE MOVED that Ordinance No. 3117 adopting the
STANDARDS newly revised Public Works Standards be adopted.
Bennett seconded and the motion carried.
COMMUTER RAIL (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3L)
Commuter Rail System. ADOPTION of Resolution No.
1356 relating to Commuter Rail System, as recom-
mended by the Public Works Committee.
3
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION of the City
Council of the City of Kent,
Washington, adopting a Water
Conservation Program as an
additional element of the City' s
Water Comprehensive Plan.
WHEREAS, South King County, including the City of Kent, has
been designated a critical water supply service area pursuant to
Chapter 70 . 116 RCW, the Public Water System Coordination Act; and
WHEREAS, the King County Water Utility Coordinating Committee
has developed a South King County Coordinated Water System Plan
("CWSP") that imposes certain obligations upon all public water
system purveyors in South King County, including the City of Kent;
and
WHEREAS, a water conservation program is an integral element
of the South King County CWSP; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with King County Ordinance No. 9461,
all purveyors subject to the South King County CWSP must adopt a
water conservation program. NOW, THEREFORE,
The. City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, does hereby
resolve as follows :
Section 1. The "City of Kent Water Conservation Plan"
attached as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference
shall be incorporated as an additional element of the City ' s Water
Comprehensive Plan in accordance with the South King County
Coordinated Water System Plan and King County Ordinance No. 9461.
Passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Kent, Washington, this day of , 1993 .
Concurred in by the Mayor of the City of Kent, this day
of 1993 .
DAN KELLEHER, MAYOR
ATTEST:
BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ROGER A. LUBOVICH, CITY ATTORNEY
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of
Resolution No. , passed by the City Council of the City
of Kent, Washington, on the day of 1993 .
(SEAL)
CITY CLERK
WATRCONS.res
2
CITY OF KENT
WATER CONSERVATION PLAN
1993
This document details the Water Conservation Plan for the City of Kent in keeping
with the elements of the South King County Coordinated Water System Plan (SKC
CWSP) and King County Ordinance #9461 . The conservation plan is designed to
improve the efficient delivery of water, reduce the amount of water wasted in the
delivery process, and increase the available water supply. The City of Kent, in
addition to other Puget Sound region communities, realize that water is a life-essential,
limited resource that needs protection, preservation and conservation.
The City of Kent has been an active participant in the South King County Regional
Water Association (SKC RWA) having implemented various water conservation
programs identified in their Guidelines for Water Conservation Programs adopted May
21 , 1991 .
WATER USE DATA COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS
As identified in the Interim Guidelines prepared by the Department of Ecology,
Department of Health, and Washington Water Utilities Council, minimum data
collection is required to project public water system demands and to provide a basis
for the evaluation of the effectiveness of conservation programs. The year 1991 has
been selected as the baseline year for identifying per capita consumption. Data
collection for a six year period between 1991 and 1996 is desired to determine and
evaluate consumption trends and the effectiveness of conservation programs. The
data collection schedule for Kent is shown below by data type and frequency.
*source of supply meter - daily reading
*service meter usage recorded
single family - every two months
multi-family - every two months
commercial/public/industrial - every month
irrigation/community system - semi-annual
*unaccounted for water
*annual total by source
*peak day/peak month
*population served
*conservation data
EXHIBIT
WATER DEMAND FORECAST
The Interim Guidelines identify appropriate demand forecasting methodology for public
water systems to evaluate supply demands. Kent's water demand has been forecast
through the Water System Plan for the City of Kent and includes total water demand
forecasting as well as separate projections for residential and commercial/industrial
consumption. The projections are in line with those projected under the SKC CWSP.
Factors used in developing future demand forecasts will include water use, land
use/zoning/capacity, water rates, and conservation savings as recommended in the
Interim Guidelines.
WATER CONSERVATION PROGRAM ELEMENTS
Kent's water conservation program elements are detailed below. Program elements
previously implemented as indicated in the SKC RWA Recommended Water
Conservation Program (attachment A), include program promotion, single family/multi-
family conservation kits, water leak detection, meters for all customers, and seasonal
pricing.
In addition, the City has implemented several water conservation programs with the
SKC RWA. Kent will continue to work with the SKC RWA to develop and implement
programs at the regional level as well as the local level.
Kent recognizes the need for long range conservation planning to meet future water
demands. In December, 1992, the City hired a Conservation Specialist to coordinate
the water conservation program. In addition, as shown in the Water System Plan for
the City of Kent, other than obtaining a portion of the supply from Tacoma's Green
River Pipe Line #5, future source development involves constructing an Impoundment
Reservoir. Said impoundment reservoir would store excess winter flows from existing
sources (Clark Springs, Kent Springs and Pipe Line #5) for utilization during the peak
summer demand period. This will result in conserving the regions ground water
resources which would normally be tapped to meet the peak summer demands.
Details of Kent's Water Conservation Program, including program objectives,
elements, level of participation, schedule for implementation and budget are detailed
in this report.
PROGRAM OBJECTIVES
To meet the City's goals of attaining a 6.5% water reduction by 1995 and 8%
reduction by the year 2000, the conservation program will achieve the following
objectives:
*improve efficient delivery of water
*reduce the amount of water wasted in the delivery process
*increase the available water supply
*coordinate and support services and programs with adjacent water purveyors
*reduce peak daily consumption
*reduce peak monthly consumption
*reduce total annual consumption
*develop public awareness and education
ASSESSMENT OF CONSERVATION ACTIVITIES
The recommended conservation programs outlined in the Interim Guidelines are
grouped into four categories: (1 ) public education, (2) technical assistance, (3)
system measures, and (4) incentives/requirements. The Interim Guidelines require
Kent to implement a moderate program as identified in attachment A. Kent's water
conservation plan includes conservation elements above and beyond the minimum
elements identified in the Interim Guidelines.
PUBLIC EDUCATION
The public education programs which the City is implementing are discussed below.
These meet the requirements of the Interim Guidelines and include school outreach,
speakers bureau, program promotion, and theme shows and fairs.
School Outreach Programs - Since 1991 , the City of Kent has been involved in
securing and scheduling the "Small Change Theatre" to perform plays at local
elementary schools to teach children about the importance of water conservation.
Additional programs and activities will be developed to include school presentations,
tours of facilities, special projects involving students of all ages, and assisting with
preparation of curriculum material.
With the development of a conservation material library, schools will have access to
educational materials to assist with water conservation programs in their classrooms.
Speakers Bureau - The City of Kent will work cooperatively with the South King
County RWA to develop a speakers bureau. City staff will be available to give
presentations to groups, organizations, schools, businesses, and local residents, to
encourage water conservation practices. Kent will prepare slide and video
presentations with copies of video presentations on water conservation available for
review at local libraries.
-3-
Program Promotion - In 1991 and 1992, Kent worked cooperatively with the SKC
RWA to distribute lawn watering calendars to area residents and will incorporate the
lawn watering schedule into a summer watering campaign. Kent also distributes
water conservation information through it's utility bills and through articles in the local
newspaper. Brochures produced by the Seattle Water Department, Department of
Ecology, Department of Health, and other regional water agencies are also available
at local libraries, City facilities and departments.
The City will be producing an "Environmental Awareness" brochure/newsletter for
distribution which will include water conservation tips and information.
Special "How To" classes and workshops will be offered to citizens to show methods
of installing home water conservation devices, to provide information on types of
devices available, water conservation ideas and methods for the home and business,
outdoor watering techniques, water conserving landscape ideas and alternatives, how
to read a water meter, and water supply sources and issues.
A "Home Water Conservation Survey" was conducted in September 1991 in
cooperation with the SKC RWA, the cities of Bellevue, Everett, Fife, Kent, Puyallup
and Tacoma. Results of the survey will be incorporated into public education
programs.
The development of a conservation library will include a wide range of multi-media
materials. Brochures, pamphlets, books, portable displays, slide and video
presentations relating to water conservation will be available to use at fairs, town
meetings, community events, public meetings, schools and businesses.
Theme Shows and Fairs - The City of Kent provides staff, water conservation
materials and displays to local and regional theme shows, fairs and the annual City of
Kent Town Meeting. Exhibits are available to use at events throughout the area.
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
Kent currently offers assistance to customers within it's service area, in addition to
working with the SKC RWA and other purveyors to provide technical assistance to
customers as well as researching and conducting technical studies.
Purveyor Assistance - The City of Kent will continue to work with other purveyors to
provide assistance in developing and implementing conservation plans. The City's
participation in the Water Conservation Coalition of Puget Sound and regional
coordination in developing and implementing programs for the Puget Sound area, can
greatly increase the effectiveness of water conservation.
4-
Customer Assistance - Through the development of educational programs and
information, and the training of staff on water conservation methods and devices, the
City will provide direct assistance to customers to facilitate water conservation.
Technical Studies - In 1991, the City of Kent, South King County RWA and other
purveyors, hired Market Data Research to conduct a residential indoor water use
survey. Survey results included customer's perceptions of available water supplies,
customer behavior and attitudes, and current knowledge and use of conservation
practices. Customers were also asked to respond to different conservation options
available to assure future water supplies. Information collected from the survey will
be used to develop appropriate conservation programs. The survey will be conducted
in future years to audit changes in customers conservation practices, awareness and
attitudes. Future plans will also include water audits of commercial and industrial
customers.
The City will continue to work with the SKC RWA and other water purveyors to
collect data and research new technology to develop new programs which will
produce measurable water savings.
Bill Showing Consumption History - Kent will be implementing new programming on
their customer water bill showing a graph depicting water consumption history, thus
encouraging water conservation.
SYSTEM MEASURES
System measures include a 100 percent metered system, unaccounted water/leak
detection, and high technology meters.
Metered Systems - The City of Kent requires metered systems for all domestic and /or
industrial consumption of water. Additionally, all water service connections and
plumbing must conform to relevant Washington State plumbing codes and City of
Kent standards.
Unaccounted Water/Leak Detection - In 1991 , the City conducted a leak survey of the
oldest sections of town. A very minimum number of leaks were found and repaired.
The City's inspection, repair, and replacement program is ongoing as a part of the
preventive maintenance program.
High Technology Meters - In recent years, the City's water system was upgraded to
include a state-of-the-art automated computerized control and telemetry system.
-5-
INCENTIVES/REQUIREMENTS
Incentives and requirements for the water conservation plan include single
family/multi-family retrofit kits, new conservation practices for nurseries and
agriculture, landscape management, conservation pricing, utility financed retrofit,
mandatory seasonal water restrictions, potential recycle/reuse,and pressure reduction.
Single Family/Multi-Family Retrofit - The City distributes kits containing water saving
devices at it's annual town meeting in addition to educational and informational
materials. The City of Kent Home Repair Program is also available to low-income and
elderly residents to assist in installing devices and making minor repairs. Kent will
work with the SKC RWA, Tacoma Water Division, Seattle Water Department, City of
Everett, the BPA, and other utilities, to distribute devices in a regional effort. Kent
-will also look at programs and methods to deliver water conservation kits and
information to single family and multi-family customers.
Nurseries/Agriculture - The City will continue to encourage the application of new
technology for irrigation systems that will achieve greater irrigation efficiency. A
computerized irrigation system was installed during construction of the City's new
golf course in 1991 , to increase efficiency in irrigation. Water for the irrigation
system is taken from on-site wells. City facilities and departments will continue
working together to promote and publicly demonstrate water conservation practices.
Landscape Manage ment/Playfields - Kent will continue to encourage the use of low
water demand landscaping by commercial, industrial, public and private water
customers throughout the area. Public education materials, workshops,
demonstrations and use of the speakers bureau, will be utilized to promote new
landscaping ideas and methods to achieve greater irrigation efficiency.
City Departments will work together to inventory properties, facilities, and develop
plans for repairs and upgrades to irrigation systems. Results of Tacoma's landscape
pilot study will be reviewed to help develop outdoor irrigation conservation measures
and future landscape standards.
Conservation Pricing - In July, 1992, The City of Kent implemented seasonal water
rates to encourage water conservation. Implementation of the water bill showing
consumption history and providing customers with education and information relating
to water conservation will encourage wise and efficient use of water.
Utility Financed Retrofit - The City and SKC RWA will review program options for
utility financed retrofit. Potential programs range from rebates to providing fixtures
at the system's cost or at no cost. Kent's local retrofit program as discussed earlier
is financed through the City's water fund.
-6-
Mandatory Seasonal Restrictions - The City has adopted "Water Shortage Emergency
Regulations" establishing methods and regulations for rationing water during a water
shortage emergency. Future plans also include preparing a waste water ordinance
focusing on wasteful uses of water such as gutter flooding, watering sidewalks and
driveways, etc., and an outdoor watering policy such as watering schedules to reduce
peak day impact on the system.
Recycling/Reuse - The City of Kent is attending meetings with METRO on possible
water reuse. METRO is considering a regional study to look at potential
recycling/reuse opportunities. Kent will continue to examine possibilities for water
reuse and recycling as a method to reducing water demands. An example would be
to encourage reuse of water through water rates which provide an incentive for major
industrial water users to develop treatment/reuse/recycle systems.
Pressure Reduction - Pressure reduction is used throughout the City. Due to terrain,
Kent's water system is comprised of five distinct pressure zones. Additionally, several
of these zones are further subdivided into two or three subzones. While this provides
a working pressure of 35-85 PSI throughout the system, it also makes the system
very complicated and difficult to maintain. Any further breakdown of the service area
will require weighing the operational integrity and reliability of the system against any
conservation gain.
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Monitoring and evaluating the individual conservation measures during and after
implementation of the conservation plan are essential to judging the effectiveness of
the plan. It is important to develop reliable data to use in analyzing the actual water
use after the conservation plan has been in place for a period of time, to identify
whether goals and objectives are being met. This process can identify areas of the
program that need to be changed. Periodic review and evaluation to "fine tune" the
plan is important. Factors such as population, growth rate, and revenue will be taken
into account when an evaluation is conducted. Looking at change in population and
growth rate will help determine what effect the changes have on the demand for
water.
Important monitoring data to keep for each conservation measure includes:
1 . The number of customers affected by the measure in each category, i.e. the
number of customers who received a bill insert, brochures, read newspaper
articles, etc.
2. The amount of conservation literature and /or devices distributed for each
measure.
-7-
3. The expected amount of savings from each of the distributed conservation
devices.
4. The number of customers who actually received conservation devices or
responded to offers of assistance.
5. The number of customers who actually installed the conservation devices.
6. The average water used in a specific activity by each category of customer
before implementation of a conservation measure targeted for that activity
and after implementation of the conservation measure.
7. Data on how changes in weather affect the demand for water in particular
activities targeted for conservation measures.
SUMMARY
Implementation of the water conservation plan will have numerous benefits on our
environment. Saving water today will improve wildlife and fisheries hab.itat, increase
the aesthetic and recreation value of streams and rivers, and protect water sources
for meeting future demands.
-8-
CITY OF KENT
WATER CONSERVATION PLAN
PROGRAM ELEMENT % REDUCTION IN WATER USE
1995 GOAL 2000 GOAL
A. PUBLIC EDUCATION 1 1.5
1. School Outreach
Small Change Theatre
Presentations
Tours
Special Projects
2. Speakers Bureau
3. Program Promotion _
Lawn Watering Calendars
Brochures and Information
Classes and Workshops
B. TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE 2.5 3
1. Purveyor Assistance
2. Customer Assistance
3. Technical Studies
Residential Indoor Water Survey
Residential Water Audit
Commercial/Industrial Water Audit
4. Bill Showing Consumption History
C. SYSTEM MEASURES 1 1
1. Metered System
Source
Service
2. Unaccounted Water/Leak Detection
3. High Technology Meters
D. INCENTIVES/REQUIREMENT 2 2.5
1. Single Family/Multi-Family Retrofit Kits
2. Nurseries/Agriculture
3. Landscape Management/Playfields
4. Conservation Pricing
5. Utility Financed Retrofit
6. Mandatory Seasonal Restrictions
Water Shortage Emergency Regulations
Draft Waste Water Ordinance
Draft Outdoor Watering Policy
7. Recycle/Reuse
B. Pressure Reduction
-9-
CITY OF KENT
WATER CONSERVATION PLAN
PROGRAM ELEMENT IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE BUDGET
1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996
A. PUBLIC EDUCATION
1. School Outreach -------------------I
Change Theatre ------------------------------------------------------- $1,950/year
Presentations _________________________
Tours
---------------------------
Special Projects --------- -------------------------
2. Speakers Bureau ___________________________________
3. Program Promotion -------------------------------------------------------
Lawn Watering Calendars ------------------- ------------------------------------ $100/year
Brochures and Information - --------- ------------------------------------ $8,000
Classes and Workshops __________________________
Conservation Library ------------------------------------ $1,000
B. TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
1. Purveyor Assistance ___________________________
2. Customer Assistance ___________________________
3. Technical Studies -------------------- ----------------------------------
Residential Indoor Water Survey ----------------- $5,000/survey
Residential Water Audit ----------------- $80/sf $50/mf
Commercial/Industrial Water Audit ----------------- $150/customer
4.Bill Showing Consumption History ----------------------------------- .$8,000 first year
C. SYSTEM MEASURES $5,000/year
1. Metered System -------------------------------------------------------- customer pays
Source —
Service
--------------------------------------------------------
2. Unaccounted Water/Leak Detection -------------------- ---------------------------------- $.035 Lf.
3. High Technology Meters --------------------_----------------------------------
D. INCENTIVES/REQUIREMENT
1. Single Family/Multi-Family Retrofit ---------------------_____-____-_-______-___-_________-
2. Nurseries/Agriculture ------------------.---------------------------------
3. Landscape Management/Playfields _________________________-
4. Conservation Pricing ----------__________________________________.
5. Utility Financed Retrofit ___________________________
6. Mandatory Seasonal Restrictions
Water Shortage Regulations ---------_________________________________________
Draft Waste Water Ordinance ________________-
Draft Outdoor Watering Policy __--__-_-___-__-
7. Recycle/Reuse ___________________________
8. Pressure Reduction
sf--single family, mf--multi-family
I.f.-linear foot
ALL PROGRAMS ARE FINANCED THROUGH THE CITY OF KENT WATER FUND/CONSERVATION
PROGRAM UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. COSTS OTHER THAN OVERHEAD ARE SHOWN.
-10-
ATTACHMENT A
ro 13
O
x X x x x
0
0
z I a.
0
x
E!
c/l
<
u >
E3
x x x�D C)
0
0
x x x x C u
>4 X >< �-4 x X x x X >1 pc�
< 00
�D
0
c v 0
0 W
a 0
0
u 0
w •o �> El
D
u 0 0
>1 a m U m E u
0 w
< u
w 0
r 5 0
p 0
CT 0 F
> E 0 1m m w 0
m F I. c o 13
w
c 0 0 0
0 ID ;c 0 0 0
u a m .1 w m ci P. p 0
0 0 u D 0 p 1. m w a u 1. c v Y m :3
8 r 0 w w I f4 M " W U 0 W a w 0-• o v 0
0 u -c c a 13 0 x L ' c m 0 o 0 . n' 0 F --.0
-+ C v 0 0 C 3 v w v c a u
0 0 :r 'c X . w 0 " 0 0
0 u 0 •.' �� w
I c u >1
u 0 W., w 0 w 0 m 0 u
0 ro C0 13 0
w 0 w
E3
Ei
ECONOMIC AND ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC.
CITY OF KENT
WATER CONSERVATION PLAN
BUDGET IMPACT
PROGRAM ELEMENT FIRST YEAR YEARLY
Public Education
Small Change Theatre $ 1 ,950 $ 1,950
Program Promotion
Lawn watering calendar 100 100
Conservation brochures 2,500 1,000
Quarterly newsletter 8,000 8,000
Library material - videos, books 1 ,000 300
Technical Studies
Bill showing consumption history 8,000 5,000
(based on 12,500 monthly statements,
initial set up $2,800, $350 monthly)
TOTAL $21,550 $16,350
Kent City Council Meeting
Date June 1, 1993
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: 1993 CORRECTION FACILITY HEALTH SERVICES CONTRACT
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Acceptance of and authorization for the
Mayor to sign the Seattle-King County Dept. of Public Health
contract to provide medical services at the Kent Correction
Facility, as recommended by the Public Safety Committee on
May 17 . This is an annual contract that expired on 12/31/92 .
Contract negotiations were prolonged due to the desire to
increase service and reduce cost, which was successfully
accomplished.
3 . EXHIBITS: Agreement
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Safety Committee, 2-0 (Johnson not
present, but approved placement on Consent Calendar)
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
FISCALJPERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 3D
Contractor: Seattle-King County Department of
Public Health
Address: 110 Prefontaine Place South
Suite 600
Seattle, Washington 98104
Services Provided: Jail Health Services
Amount: $83 , 836. 48
Duration: January 1, 1993 through
December 31, 1993
Liaison, Health Barbara Hadley
Department: (206) 296-1082
City. of Kent: Captain Dennis Byerly
220 Fourth Avenue South
Kent, Washington 98031
CONTRACT FOR SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT, entered into as of the 1st day of January, 1993 , by
the City of Kent, hereinafter referred to as the "City, " and the
Seattle-King County Department of Public Health, hereinafter referred
to as the "Contractor, "
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, the City is undertaking certain activities necessary to meet
health needs as they relate to correctional health services; and
WHEREAS , the City desires to engage the Contractor to render certain
services in connection with such undertaking of the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties do mutually agree as follows:
I . Scone of Services
A. The Contractor ' s responsibilities include:
1. Scheduling
A nurse practitioner will be scheduled for 12 hours per
week and a public health nurse will be scheduled for 25
hours per week. Holidays and leaves of absence will
necessitate variation in the scheduling of personnel
and ability to recruit appropriate staff may limit
ability to provide service.
2 . Sick Call
a . A minimum of 20 hours/week of sick call will be
Contract for Services - January 1, 1993
City of Kent/Seattle-King County Department of Public Health
Page 2
available. It will be scheduled Monday through
Friday. Clinic hours will be determined by mutual
agreement. Sick call consists of diagnostic and
treatment services for acute and chronic illness
and will be provided by nurse practitioner and
public health nurse staff consistent with Section
A. 1.
b. Treatment of acute or chronic medical conditions
will be limited by:
• licensure, certification, and training of nurse
practitioners and public health nurses .
• availability of monitoring, observational and
treatment capabilities of qualified staff.
• availability of support and consultant
resources.
C. Laboratory tests ordered by Contractor staff will
be provided by the Contractor.
3 . 14-day Health Appraisal
a. 14-day health appraisals will be conducted within
the loth and 17th day of confinement.
b. The 14-day health appraisal will include:
• basic medical/health history,
• vital signs,
• brief physical examination,
• TB skin test,
• syphilis serology,
• review of Contractor-approved
Reviewing/Screening form.
4 . Health Receiving Screening
a. The Contractor will update, as necessary, the
Health Receiving/Screening form.
b. The Contractor staff will train officers in use
and application of the form.
C. The Contractor staff will review all Health
Receiving/Screening Forms and recommend
appropriate follow-up.
5 . Triage
a . Contractor staff will review written inmate
complaints/requests during normal Monday through
Friday clinic hours .
b. Corrections staff will collect written inmate
complaints/requests during the hours the
Contractor staff are not at the correction
Contract for Services - January 1, 1993
City of Kent/Seattle-King County Department of Public Health
Page 3
facility.
C. Contractor staff will prioritize
complaints/requests and will follow-up as
appropriate.
6 . Medical Records
a. Contractor staff will maintain the medical records
system.
b. Contractor staff will maintain a system which
protects the confidentiality of health
information.
C. Corrections staff will insure the provisions of
Section 5.b above are maintained.
d. Contractor staff, upon notification of corrections
staff, will prepare appropriate information on
inmates transferred to another correctional
facility.
e. Contractor is the .keeper of the health records.
Release of any confidential health information
will be done by the Contractor per the
Contractor ' s policy and procedures .
f . City will pay for clerical staff 2 hours per week
to handle medical records .
7 . Policy and Procedure Manual
Contractor will maintain a policy and procedure manual
for activities and services provided by Contractor
staff.
B . Medications
Prescriptions written by Contractor will be supplied in
standard pharmacy packing through a pharmacy contract
to a maximum Contractor ' s responsibility of $720 . 00,
unless renegotiated by the City and Contractor. This
pharmacy contract will be obtained by and for the
Contractor.
9 . Medication Administration
Contractor staff will administer all jail health-
approved medications to the individual inmates when
such staff are on site during normal Monday through
Friday clinic hours. The City will be responsible for
medication distribution at other times .
10 . Dental Services
Dental services will be limited to emergency care or
Contract for Services - January 1, 1993
City of Kent/Seattle-King County Department of Public Health
Page 4
pain relief and may be provided at Contractor' s
location during normal clinic hours (8 : 00 AM to 4 : 30
PM, Monday through Friday) . Two (2) hours notification
by the City is needed to make necessary accommodations .
a. Transporting, escort service, and security will be
provided by the City.
b. Payment for dental services will be in accordance
with Section III .B. of this agreement and is
separate from the base agreement.
C. Due to the disruption of normal clinic activity,
any appointment that is more than 15 minutes late
will be rescheduled. The City will be charged for
any such missed appointment, or a cancellation
without at least 24 hours notice, at the rate of a
normal examination.
11. Telephone Consultation Services
Contractor staff will provide limited telephone
consultation to Corrections staff during periods when
the clinic is not scheduled . This service is subject
to the following limitations :
a. Contractor staff will be available only at
telephone numbers which they will provide.
b. Contractor staff will not be on any form of
"standby. "
C. Contractor staff availability depends on their
voluntary presence at a given telephone site and
willingness to participate.
d. Contractor staff participation is strictly
voluntary at all times .
e. The City will be charged for not less than 15
minutes of Contractor staff time for each
telephone consultation and in increments of 15
minutes for any time after that for each incident.
The charge for service time will be according to
personnel costs for labor at the time of
consultation in accordance to Washington State
Nursing Association-King County contract or King
County Personnel rules, whichever applies . This
cost will be above and beyond the amount listed in
the basic contract.
f . Such telephone consultation will be limited to
basic medical triage/screening and not be
construed as emergency care. Contractor staff
will provide advice regarding necessary further
action required.
g. Contractor staff who receive consulting telephone
calls will maintain a log indicating the date,
time length of call, and general call content.
Contract for Services - January 1, 1993
City of Kent/Seattle-King County Department of Public Health
Page 5
This log will be reviewed at least quarterly or
upon request, with the City of Kent Correctional
Facility administrator.
h. An itemized list of telephone consultations,
including actual costs, will be submitted by the
Contractor to the City of Kent Correctional
Facility administrator on a monthly basis.
12 . The Contractor' s Jail Health Service administrator or
designee will meet quarterly with the City' s
Correctional Facility administrator and review the
health care delivery system.
13 . The Contractor will provide quarterly and annual
statistical reports on the health care delivery system
in the city' s correctional facility.
B. The City' s responsibilities include:
1. Providing an appropriate examination room, furnishings ,
telephone, and security for the Contractor' s staff .
2 . Providing for the security of records and maintenance
of confidentiality when Contractor staff is not on
site.
3 . Providing medical, dental and pharmacy services not
specifically provided by the Contractor, and any
psychiatric services.
4 . The City ' s correctional facility administrator will
meet quarterly with the Contractor ' s jail health
administrator or designee to review the health care
delivery system.
II . Time of Performance
The services of the Contractor are to commence on the 1st day of
January, 1993 , and terminate on the 31st day of December, 1993 .
The duration of the contract may be extended or terminated upon
mutual written agreement between the parties hereto and pursuant
to the terms and conditions of the agreement.
III . Compensation and Method of Pavment
A. The City agrees to compensate the Contractor in the total
amount not to exceed $83 , 836 . 48 for basic services; optional
services will be charged according to fee schedule and
approved use. Assumptions are included on Exhibit A. The
City shall make payment within 30 days of receipt and
approval of invoices (s) .
Contract for Services - January 1, 1993
City of Kent/Seattle-King County Department of Public Health
Page 6
B. The City shall reimburse the Contractor for dental services
- see Exhibit B. The City shall make payment within 30 days
of receipt and approval of invoice(s) .
C. The 1993 contract amount includes indirect overhead charges
based on annually established County and Departmental rates.
IV. Indemnification
The City shall defend, protect, and hold harmless the Contractor,
its elected and appointed officials, and any employee thereof,
from and against all claims, suits or actions, including the cost
of -defense thereof , arising any negligent act or omission, or
violation of constitutional or civil rights committed by the City
pursuant to this contract.
The City agrees that its obligations under this subparagraph
extend to any claim, demand or cause of action brought by or on
behalf of any employee of the City against the Contractor, its
officer, agents or employees, 'and includes any judgement, award,
and cost arising therefrom, including attorney' s fees.
The Contractor shall defend, protect, and hold harmless the City,
its elected and appointed officials, and any employee thereof ,
from and against all claims, suits or actions, including the cost
of defense thereof, arising from any negligent act or omission or
violation of constitutional or civil rights committed by the
Contractor pursuant to this contract. The Contractor agrees that
the obligation to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City
and its agents and employees under this subparagraph extends to
any claim, demand or cause of action brought by or on behalf of
any employee of the Contractor, against the City, its officers,
agents, or employees and include any judgement, award and cost
arising therefrom, including attorney ' s fees .
V. Chanaes
Either party may request changes in the scope of services,
performing or reporting standards, or budget provided herein.
Proposed changes which are mutually agreed upon shall be
incorporated by written amendments to this agreement, signed by
both parties. This contract supersedes all previous contracts or
agreements relative to services .
VI . Termination
The City may, by written notice of default to the Contractor,
terminate the whole or any part of the Agreement if , (1) the
Contractor fails to provide services called for by this Agreement
within the time specified herein, or if , (2) funding becomes no
longer available for the project described herein.
Contract for Services - January 1 , 1993
City of Kent/Seattle-King County Department of Public Health
Page 7
Either party to this Agreement may terminate the whole or any
part of the Agreement for any reason by providing written notice to
the other party thirty (30 ) days prior to the effective date of
termination .
IN WITNESS WHEREOF , the parties hereto have caused this Contract to
be executed the day and year first herein written .
CITY OF KENT SEATTLE-KING COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH
Signature Signature
TINT nil'
Name Name
WNG COUNTY EXECUTIV:
Title Title
ATTEST : ATTEST '
OR
City Clerk Department o xecutive
Administration
;lanountSy
TO FORM :
Prosecuting
Attorney
EXHIBIT
KENT JAIL HEALTH PROGRAM BUDGET
01/01/93 THROUGH 12/31/93
PERSONNELCOSTS
NURSE PRACTITIONER @ $34.69 PER HOUR 624 hrs. $21,646.00
PUBLIC HEALTH NURSE 9 $32.79 PER HOUR 1300 hrs. $42,632.48
ADMINISTRATIVE SPECIALIST I AT $15.36 PER HOUR 104 hrs. $1,597.00
INTERMITTENT NURSING STAFF @ $28.56 PER HOUR 160 hrs. $4,570.00
................
SUBTOTAL PERSONNEL COSTS $70,445.48
SUPPORT COSTS
OFFICE SUPPLIES $650.00
PHARMACEUTICALS $720.00
PUBLICATIONS $155.00
MEDICAL SUPPLIES $414.00
MISC. OPERATING SUPPLIES $104.00
LABORATORY SERVICES $508.00
MILEAGE $544.00
SUBTOTALSUPPORT COSTS $3,095.00
TOTAL OF SUPPORTAND PERSONNELCOSTS $73,540.48
............
CONTRACT OVERHEAD (14%) $10,296.00
...... .....
TOTAL CONTRACT BASIC SERVICES $83,836.48
. .........
OPTIONAL SERVICES (see contractfor details)
ARNP PHONE CONSULT — 40 15 min calls per mo @ 1.5 1120 hrs. $5,658.00
*ARNP/PHN HOLIDAY COVERAGE — 10 HOLIDAYS @ 2-5) 50 hrs. $3,929.00
OVERTIME @ 1.5x HRLY RATE ($31.43) 10 HRS. PER MO. 120 hrs. $5,658.00
... ........
SUBTOTAL: MAX USE OF ALL OPTIONAL SERVICES $15,245.00
............
OVERHEAD @ 14% OF MAXIMUM OPTIONS $2,134.00
TOTAL: MAX USE OF ALL OPTIONALSERVICES $17,379.00
TOTAL — MAX USE OF OPTIONS + BASIC SERVICES $101 ,215.48
MOST COMMON DENTAL PROBLEMS
Effective
1/1/93
FULL 75% OF 50% OF 25% OF - 0 -
PHIS FEE FULL FEE FULL FEE FULL FEE
PROCEDURE CODE E D C B A
DIAGNOSTIC
Initial Exam 001101 11 .00 8.25 5.50 2.75
Periodic Exam 001201 11 .00 8.25 5.50 2.75
Emergency Exam 001301 11 .00 8.25 5.50 2.75
Film PA, 1 st 002201 6.00 4.50 3.00 1 .50
Film PA, Additional 002301 1 .00 0.75 0.50 0.25
Film, BWX 1 002701 5.00 3.75 2.50 1 .25
Films, BWX 2 002721 6.00 4.50 3.00 1 .50
Films, BWX 4 002741 8.00 6.00 4.00 2.00
RESTORATIVE
Amal Dec 1 surf 021102 28.00 21 .00 14.00 7.00
Amal Dec 2 surf 021201 38.00 28.50 19.00 9.50
Amal Dec 3 surf 021301 46.00 - 34.50 23.00 11.50
Amal Dec 4 surf 021311 53.00 39.75 26.50 13.25
Amal Perm 1 surf 021401 30.00 22.50 15.00 7.50
4mal Perm 2 surf 021501 44.00 33.00 22.00 11.00
Amal Perm 3 surf 021601 55.00 41 .25 27.50 13.75
Amal Perm 4 surf 021611 67.00 50.25 33.50 16.75
Ant Comp 1 surf 023301 33.00 24.75 16.50 8.25
Ant Comp 2 surf 023311 50.00 37.50 25.00 12.50
Ant Comp 3 surf 023321 64.00 48.00 32.00 16.00
Ant Comp 4 surf 023351 76.00 57.00 38.00 19.00
Recement Crown 029201 17.00 12.75 8.50 4.25
SSC Crown Dec 029301 61 .00 45.75 30.50 15.25
SSC Crown Perm 029311 73.00 54.75 36.50 18.25
PREVENTIVE
Prophy, adult 011101 30.00 22.50 15.00 7.50
Prophy, child 011201 23.00 17.25 11 .50 5.75
Topical Applications 012011 35.00 26.25 17.50 8.75
Fluoride 012031 12.00 9.00 6.00 3.00
Sealant 013511 11.00 8.25 5.50 2.75
FULL 75% OF 50% OF 25% OF A-
PHIS FEE FULL FEE FULL FEE FULL FEE
PROCEDURE CODE E D C B A
SPACE MAINTENANCE
Fixed Unilat. 015101 73.00 54.75 36.50 18.25
Fixed Bilat. 015151 84.00 63.00 42.00 21 .00
Recement Spacer 015501 17.00 12 75 8.50 4.25
PERIODONTICS
Root Planing Quad 043411 27.00 2025. 13.50 6.75
ENDODONTICS
Pulpotomy 032201 34.00 25.50 17.00 8.50
One Canal 033101 156.00 117.00 78.00 39.00
Two Canals 033201 212.00 159.00 106.00 53.00
Three Canals 033301 258.00 193 50 129.00 64.50
Apexification 033501 27.00 20 25 13.50 6.75
PROSTHETICS
Complete Upper 051101 355.00 266.25 177.50 88.75
Complete Lower 051201 355.00 266.25 177.50 88.75
Adjust Upper CD 054101 16.00 12.00 8.00 4.00
Adjust Lower CD 054111 16.00 1200 8.00 4.00
Adjust U Partial 054211 16.00 12.00 8.00 4.00
Adjust L Partial 054221 16.00 12 00 8.00 4.00
Reline Upper 057501 108.00 81 .00 54.00 27.00
Reline Lower 057511 108.00 81 ,00 54.00 27.00
Reline U Partial 057601 99.00 74 25 49.50 24.75
Reline L Partial 057511 99.00 74 25 49.50 24.75
Tissue Condition 058501 19.00 14 25 9.50 4.75
Repair (write in)
ORAL SURGERY
Ext. Single Tooth 071101 29.00 21 75 14.50 7.25
Ext. Additional Teeth 071201 24.00 18.00 12.00 6.00
Root Removal 071301 29.00 21 75 14.50 7.25
Surgical Ext. 072101 57.00 42.75 28.50 14.25
Inc. and Drain 075101 30.00 22 50 15.00 7.50
MISC
TMJ Splint 078801 162.00 121-50 81 .00 40.50
Palliative Treatment 091 101 24.00 18.00 12.00 6.00
Management Problem 099201 16.00 12 00 8.00 4.00
Consult DSHS manual for codes and fees for procedures not listed above.
FISCAL: Dentfees.xls
WORK SCHEDULE VARIATION REQUEST
(COMP-TIME, OVERTIME, VACATION, ETC.)
I Request APPROVAL For:
❑ In-House Comp-Time*
❑ Overtime Pays
❑ Holiday Comp-Time
❑ Others
Date
Hours Worked AM/PM Thru AM/PM = Extra Hours
*Justification
Employee's Signature Date
Approval Signature Date
PHSS' Initials Administrator's Initials
Date Number of Approved Hrs
:y
J
1
CONTRACT ASSUMPTIONS— BASIC SERVICES
1. Hourly wages include 1993 COLA, contract adjustments, and fringe benefits
2. Overhead on basic services will be billed at 1/12 each month
3. Personnel costs based upon ability to schedule full basic service hours
4. Supplies and services to be billed at actuals; significant variances from contract
will be addressed on a quarterly basis (except overhead)
CONTRACTASSUMPTIONS — OPTIONAL SERVICES
1. All overtime will be requested by authorized Kent Correctional personnel
and submitted on signed JHS payroll slips — see attached
2. Any holiday coverage will be requested by authorized Kent Correctional personnel three
weeks in advance of the holiday; request to be made through Nancy Roberts, 296-1090
3. Hours for call consultation are to be scheduled by authorized Kent Correctional
personnel no later than the 15th of the month prior to use of call system; notify Nancy Roberts
Captain Miller: Please sign below to signify your approval of the assumptions and budget.
List names of Kent Correctional personnel authorized to approve overtime, holidays, and call schedi
Full contract to follow. Please indicate call preference for January coverage.
Signature Date
b:lkentpro.wk3
Kent City Council Meeting
Date June 1, 1993
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: WASHINGTON TRAFFIC SAFETY GRANT - SAFETY BELT
AWARENESS PROJECT
2 . SU ENT: s recommended by the Public Safety)
ommittee on Ma
cceptance of a Washington Traffic
Sa e y Grant for Kent C munity Safety Belt Awareness Project
in the amount of $5, OOO- k'
3 . EXHIBITS: Agreement
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Safety Committee 2-0 (Johnson not
present but approved placement on Consent Calendar) . Executive
Committee approved
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES _
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended4/� lUi Not Recommended
6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 3E
,:HARLES F. HAYES �• „ -
Y
Director may' y�y
STATE OF WASHINCTOV
WASHINGTON TRAFFIC SAFETY CO.ti1iOISSI N
1000 S. Cnerry 51., PO Box 40944 • OJvmpia, Washington 98504-0944 I206) 53-619
April 16, 1993
Lieutenant Lorna Rufener
Kent Police Department
220 Fourth South
Kent, Washington 98032
Dear Lieutenant Rufener:
Your 11153" project application has been reviewed and approved for
the total amount requested ($5000. ) .
We understand you will be instructing the public via
enforcement/educational contacts in the importance of the use of
seat belts and child car seats. You will be measuring seat belt
and child restraint use in your community through use of 11100 car"
observational surveys as well as tracking the number of violator
contacts.
As a part of your program you will be purchasing various "Buckle-
Up" promotional materials to use in your educational programs .
Please proceed as outlined in the project agreement. Original
backup documentation for all expenditures must be kept in your
records. Copies of expenditure documentation must be attached to
your claim for reimbursement (on the enclosed A-19 form) . . Send the
claim to:
Washington Traffic Safety Commission
1000 South Cherry Street
P.O. Box 40944
Olympia, Washington 98504-09442
Attention: Mike Cleland
If you have any questions regarding this or other Commission
programs, please contact me at (206) 753-0877 or SCAN 234-0877 .
Sincerely,
Mike Cleland
Program Manager
Washington Traffic Safety Commission A C n
Section 3
Budget and Cost Sharing
BUDGET
1. Salaries and Wages: $ 2,315.00
2 . Employee Benefits: $ 280.00
3 . Travel and Subsistence: $ 90.00
4. Goods and Services $ 2,315.00
TOTAL $ 5,000.00
Cost Sharing: Matching Share:
(Washington Traffic Safety Commission use only) WSP Field Salaries FY_
Share Amount Percent Applies To:
Federal: $ State
State: $ Local
Political Subdivision: $
Total Estimated Cost: $
Revision:
BUDGET
1. Wages
Program Coordinator $ 502 . 00
(5t of time for 2 months)
Program Assistant I
(70 Hours @ $17.50) 1,225.00
Program Assistant II
(42 Hours @ $14. 00) 588 . 00
'Total Salaries $ 2,315.00
2. Benefits
Program Coordinator $ 141. 00
(@ . 28t of salary)
Program Assistant I
(@ . 08t of salary) $ 98 . 00
Program Assistant II
(7% of salary) 41. 00
Total Benefits $ 280.00
3 . Travel (320 miles)
20 miles r/t per store (8) $ 90. 00
x 2 visits x .28 per mile
Total Travel $ 90 .00
4. Operating Expenses
Litter Bags @ $42 .80 per 1000 $ 2-1315. 00
x 50, 000 + 175. 00 tax
Total Operating Expenses $ 2,315.00
TOTAL BUDGET $ 5,000. 00
sbgrnt2
FORM STATE OF WASNINGTON
I AGENCY USE (ILLY
A79 1A INVOICE VOUCHER AGE NO. 1-060 om CODE F.R. OR AUTH. NO.
l (R.,1:91J
INSTRUCTIONS TO VENDOR OR CLAIMANT- Suomit tics corm ro
claim payment for materrars. merchandise or services. Snow comdtere
detail !or each item.
Vendor's Certificate. I hereby certify under penalty of perjury the: :he
YEHDOR-'OR CLA[MANT'twarrata is.to be payable to) Items and totals listed herein are Proper cnarges :or materias.
merchandise or services furnished to the State of Washington,and Inat mi
goods lurnished and:or services rendered have been provided wtincut
disvimine ion on the grounds of race.creed,color,national origin.sex.or
age
BY
- (SIGN IN INK)
('ITLE) iDA�2
FEDERAL I.D. NO. CUR SOCIAL SECURITY NO. (For Reporting Personal Services Comrac: Paymems to I.R.S.) RECE.'/EC By DATE 'ECEIVED ;
4 1 ( UNIT - FOR AGENCY
DATE - - DESCRIPTION i QUANTITY+ UNIT I PRICE. AMOUNT _ USE i
i
PREPARED BY 'aEPNCNE NUMBER DATE AGEI ' APPROVAL DATE -
DOC. DATE PMT DUE DATE. CURRENT DOC. NO. REF. DOC NO. VENDOR NUMBER VENOCR MESSAGE USE UBI NUMBER
;TAXI
I
M45 910EA WORAC!ASS':':.il C36YR OM,TOWN ,
RG
DOC iR.DE USUF I REF O! PRONE 0�8/ `. NCE% ALLOC B f A10S liO=' lAtOU/I NVGKi 'aOAEEP
r y »«
I I
: ACCOUNTING APPROVAL FOR PAYMENT DA'E WARRANT "CTAL WAFRANT NLMEER
I
A49.A.-I
Washington Traffic Safety Commission * 153 *
State of Washington
Washington Traffic Safety C✓Om mission
1000 South Cherry Street
Olympia,Washington 98504.9936
Telephone: (2D6)753-6197
Fax:(206) 586.6489
Section 1
Project Agreement
1. Project Title: KENT COMMUNITY SAFETY BELT AWARENESS PROJECT
Type of Application: Initial: Xv, Revision:_____—
2. Ownership of facilities or equipment, acquired through this funding, shall be vested with the applicant
agency, not the United States. However,facilities or equipment acquired through this agreement shall be
utilized and retained in highway safety operations during the useful existence of such equipmerri or
facilities. Costs incurred for maintenance, repairs or support of such equipment or facTties shall be borne
fa the s. Costs incurred
Further, I is understood and agreed that the activity covered by this project, as
more pa applicant
descried in sections 2 and 3 attached hereto and made a part hereof, is undertaken
under authority of Section 153 Title 23, Unked States Code and is s tConlfrisshe administrative regulations
established by federal gulderines and the Washington Traffic Safety
3 App<�ca�A9eDCy; CITY OF KENT. WASHINGTON
4. Project director Address: 220 FOURTH SOUTH
Name: LT LORNA RUFENER KENT, �vJA 98032
TAIe: LIEUTENANT
Signature:, �� lC{ � ( � i l�
Telephone:_ (206) 859-3498
CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON
5. Govemmentaf Unit:
6. Authorizing Official, Govemmental Unit: 220 FOURTH SOUTH
ED CRAWFORD Address:
Name: KENT, WA 98032
Title: CHIEF OF POL;Z`-
Signature �
Telephone:
. 09/30;93
7. Planned Project Duration: From : 06/01 /93 To:
8. Approved by:
_ Project Number.
Name: Federal Funds ) $
Title: Director, WTSC
State: Local: --
Signature: Addendum(s) appl K icabie:
Dale:
Washington Traffic Safety CMM,"Ion . * 15 -{
section 2
Description of Activity
ber . of commissioned officers 81
Department size: num
1. Current occupant Protection Activity
SEE ATTACHED
2 , Proposed Activity
3 , Evaluation
Section 2
Description of Activity
Department size: number of commissioned officers 81
1. Current Occupant Protection Activity (WTSC Grant 93ST-4D)
Goal: To implement programs which will encourage 100%
compliance of safety belt laws in the City of Kent.
Objectives: Incorporate safety belt messages into all public
information and education activities; distribute 54, 000
pieces of information to 140 groups; use "Vince and Larry" in
five community events; educate students through classroom
presentations and at the . youth conference; support students
to conduct own safety belt awareness programs ; incorporate
student-produced message into a poster; participate in safety
belt efforts aimed at Kent employees and families ; and, train
volunteers on safety belt issues. Attachment 1
2 . Proposed Activity
Goal A: Policy - Attachment 2 / Develop a more detailed
safety belt use policy for police department employees and
those individuals riding in department vehicles as a part of
the accreditation program. (Lt. Lorna Rufener)
Goal B: Coordination / designate commissioned police officer
as occupant protection contact. (Traffic Officer Wm. Griffin)
Goal C: Training / occupant protection officer will attend
OPUE training; will participate in Wear-It Program. (Off.
Wm. Griffin)
Goal D: Documentation / Officers and records department
will document safety belt and child restraint law violator
contacts and return "Safety Restraint Enforcement Record"
with UCR mailing to WASPC. (Kathy Holt) Attachment 3
Goal E: Survey / Beginning mid-June (at close of school) a
baseline 100 -car survey will be conducted at eight (8)
McDonald' s drive-through window locations, four in Kent and
four in Renton. A second survey will be conducted at each
location to compare with baseline data by 8/31/93 . (Nancy
Mathews and Diane Lewis @ '40 hours each) Attachment 4
Goal F: Education Activity / Following initial safety belt
survey, the participating McDonald ' s restaurants will follow-
up with an awareness campaign . . . distributing litter bags
for a two week period. Staff will then do a follow-up survey
at each location to determine if there is a substantive
difference in safety belt compliance. Attachment 5
3 . Evaluation
Documentation / Reports will accompany billings submitted
August 15 and October 15, 1993 . Activity in each project
element will be documented and evaluated in accordance with
objective to -be achieved. (Nancy Mathews @ 30 hours; Diane
Lewis @ 2 hours)
WTSC Contact: Mike Cleland (206) 753-0877
Kent Contact: Nancy Mathews (206) 859-4011
sbgrnt93
ATTACHMENT 1
Safety Belt Campaigns
Goal A: To implement programs which will encourage 100%
compliance of safety belt laws in the City of Kent.
Objective: Incorporate safety belt messages into all public
information and education activities as appropriate.
Objective: Distribute safety belt information to 54 , 000
individuals or 140 groups by 6/30/93 . Use "Vince and Larry" in
five community events by 6/30/93 .
Objective: Educate students on safety belt issues through
classroom presentations and at the youth conference in the fall of
1993 ; support students (pre-school through college) in conducting
their own safety belt awareness programs.
Objective: At least one of four design contest posters will have
a safety belt message.
Objective: Coordinate safety belt education efforts with Kent
Police, Traffic Engineering and the City Wellness committee.
Participate in safety belt education efforts benefitting City of
Kent employees and families.
Objective: Train volunteers on safety belt issues.
ATTACHMENT 2
K-03
VEHICLE OPERATIONS: SAFETY IN THE OPERATION OF VEHICLES
The following objectives of the Kent Police Department concerning the
safe operation on vehicles are provided as a guideline within which
emplqoyees should operate vehicles:
Seat Belts: Employees of the Kent Police Department are required to
use safety belts at all times when operating City vehicles. No
alterations to seat belts are authorized.
Defensive Driving: Employees of the Kent Police Department are
assumed to operate vehicles in a defensive manner, particularly at
speed in excess of posted limits and when road and visibility
conditions impact the operation of vehicles safety.
Emeraency Driving: Not withstanding those sections of this manual
concerning vehicle operation under emergency conditions, the
following recommendations are made regarding the use of emergency
equipment.
1) Do not travel at speeds or drive in a manner which exceeds your
abilities.
2) Always drive with due regard for pedestrians and vehicles using
and in proximity to the roadway.
3) Fluctuate the pitch/tone of the siren, particularly when two
emergency vehicles are near one another, as the fluctuation of
pitch is more readily discernible as an emergency vehicle.
4) Do not pass on the right of a motorist while emergency equipment
is activated, unless situation demands otherwise.
Helmet: Department issue helmets will be worn by all officers riding
Department motorcycles.
Rev 8/87
1956G-33G
ATTACHMENT 3
Safety Restraint Enforcement Record
By Washington State Police Departments and Sheriffs Offices
Month Ycar
Department
County
Completed by
Safety restraints Child restraints
Infractions
Warnings
(written+ verbal)
Mail completed form to:
Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs
Uniform Crime Reporting
P.O. Box 826
Olympia, WA 98507
ATTACHMENT 4
I
100-CAR SURVEY FORM
'ICI
�i
'I
II
i.
r.
i
ii
I
i
I
it
I,
try y 7 4' K•jw. .ti�i 1!r/
{ ? a
Please
f Don't *�
t ) i Drink
and
Drive
Keep G00W
:11I1C'1'lt'i1 ucautiful TIME.
GREAT
--�►"-- -erg- ���.,,_
s McDona S IND.
f1:)ICIS
l tit Tlu� L elil rU:)' 1 Ie�sc �` -
�.{..._ ::Yst_-,•r..c'` _ :;;'sr',- rr: a %.`E+! /" � � �,'r'EI fir' s.: )tZ
Y+-�:Y.r
A_- O
IF
1 � J
Washington Traffic Safety Commisslon 15 3
Addendum A
91111ng and Reporting Requirements
Billings ed monthly and must be received by the
Invoice vouchers for payment must be prepar y
Washington Traffic Safety Commission by the loth of the month following the billing period.
Reporting Frequency and Format of reports in conjunction with
The Washington Traffic.Safety Commission requires three types ep°
traffic safety projects:
1. Monthly reports during the life of a project.
2. A final report at the conclusion of a project.
3. Special reports as required•
project reports of every kind provide the Washington Traffic Safety Commission with
information which can be used to strengthen the state's total traffic safety program. These
reports keep the Commission informed of a project's progress, explain any difficulties
encountered, provide a background of information that can be passed on to others, suggest ways
in which the Commission can assist with the project and aid in distribution of funds. Therefore,
comprehensive reports are a must for continued improvement in the state's traffic safety
operations.
Monthly Reports
These are to be submitted monthly and are due in the Traffic Safety Commission's office within
ten (10) calendar days after the end of the reporting calendar month.
The Traffic Safety Project Report forms are to be used when compiling these reports. All
sections are to be filled in as completely indicate.
sate. Any originaldorin innovative ideas oonal sheets, as ar methods
sary.) If
no action has been taken, p
employed in your project should be incorporated into your reports.
Final Report
Final reports, in duplicate, are to be more informative and must describe whether the project
objectives were accomplished, if technical and fiscal problems were encountered, and what
improvements in traffic safety have resulted or probably will result. Included in final reports
will be copies of publications, training reports and any statistical data generated in project
execution. These final reports should discuss the following:
1. Accomplishments.
2. Were all activities of the project completed as scheduled?
3. Any unanticipated proceedings that affected the project.
4. Funding and costs for completion of the project in relationship to original estimates.
Signature (Project Director)
v
WASHINGTON TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION
Addendum B
ASSURANCES - - PROJECT AGREEMENT #
Federal and state regulations require compliance with applicable provisions
which regulate contracting and subcontracting of traffic safety projects. Please read
and sign if you will comply with these provisions, then return this form to us as soon
as possible. Thank you.
DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE
In accordance with the Anti-Drug Act of 1988 (41 USC 702-707) (Drug-Free Workplace; see 42 USC
12644),the Washington Traffic Safety Commission, through its Contractor,has the responsibility to ensure
that unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession or use of a controlled substance by any
employees, grantees, and/or sub-grantees of the Agency and/or any such activity is prohibited in the
workplace. see 49 CFR 29.600 gi M; 48 CFR 9.4, 23.5, 52.2.
MINORITY-OWNED and WOMEN-OWNED BUSINESS ENTERPRISES
The Contractor will utilize minority-owned and women-owned business enterprises, if available, which are
certified by the Office of Minority and Women's Business Enterprises under the state of Washington
Certification program. The Washington Traffic Safety Commission has established the goals that, of the
dollar value of all contracts awarded by the Agency, 10.1% be awarded to minority-owned businesses and
4.0°� be awarded to women-owned businesses. The authority for this requirement is RCW 39.19 St-sea,
and rules promulgated thereunder.
AMERICANS with DISABILITIES ACT
In the performance of this agreement, the Contractor shall comply with the provisions of Title VI of Civil
Rights Act of 1964 (42 USC 200d), Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 USC 794) Chapter
49.60 RCW, and Title I of the Americans With Disabilities Act (42 USC 1211 t-12117 as now or hereafter
amended. The Contractor shall not discriminate on the grounds of race, color, national origin, sex, religion,
marital status, age, creed, Vietnam-Era and Disabled Veterans status, or the presence of any sensory,
mental, or physical handicap in:
a) Any terms or conditions of employment to include taking affirmative action necessary to
accomplish the objectives of this part; and
b) Denying an individual the opportunity to participate in any program provided by this
agreement through the provisiofis of services, or otherwise afforded others.
I certify compliance with these sections.
Signature Date
Kent City Council Meeting
Date June 1, 1993
J� Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: UNFUNDED FEDERAL MANDATES
2 . SUMMARY "!ENT. roved by the Bud e _ ommittee Adoption
of Resolution No. / (0 supporting the proposed Federal Man-
date Relief Act of 1993 . This resolution is a statement of
support for H.R. 140 , the Federal Mandate Relief Act, as intro-
duced by Congressman Gary A. Condit of California. Congressman
Condit' s bill would eliminate the Federal Government's practice
of imposing unfunded federal mandates on state and local govern-
ments which, when implemented, cause those state and local
governments to incur extensive implementation costs to comply
with the federal mandates.
3 . EXHIBITS: Resolution
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Budget Committee 3-0
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 3F
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the
City of Kent, Washington, relating to U.S .
House Bill 140, which would eliminate the
practice of imposing unfunded Federal mandates
on State and local governments and to ensure
that the Federal Government pays the costs
incurred by those governments in complying
with certain requirements under Federal
statutes and regulations.
WHEREAS, unfunded Federal mandates on State and local
governments have become increasingly extensive in recent years; and
WHEREAS , such mandates have, in many instances, added to
growing deficits in State and local budgets and have resulted in
the need for local governments to increase revenue or curtail
services; and
WHEREAS , such excessive fiscal burdens on local
governments have undermined, in many instances, the ability of
local governments to achieve their responsibilities under State and
local law; and
WHEREAS , Congressman Gary A. Condit (D-CA) has introduced
H.R. 140, the Federal Mandate Relief Act of 1993 , attached as
Exhibit A; and
WHEREAS, this legislation would assure that the Federal
Government pays the total amount of direct cost incurred by State
and local governments in complying with certain requirements which
take effect on or after the date of enactment of the Act under a
Federal statute or regulation; and
WHEREAS, this legislation would provide that any
requirement under a Federal statute or regulation that a State or
local government conduct an activity (including a requirement that
a government meet national standards in providing a service) shall
apply to the government only if all funds necessary to pay the
_direct costs incurred by the government in conducting the activity
are provided by the Federal government; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1 . The City Council of the City of Kent supports
H.R. 140 as introduced by Congressman Gary A. Condit and goes on
record as endorsing this bill .
Passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Kent, Washington this day of , 1993 .
Concurred in by the Mayor of the City of Kent, this
day of , 1993 .
DAN KELLEHER, MAYOR
ATTEST:
BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ROGER A. LUBOVICH, CITY ATTORNEY
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of
Resolution No. passed by the City Council of the City of
Kent, Washington, the day of — , 1993 .
(SEAL)
BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK
fedmndte.res
3
I
EXHIBIT A
103D CONGRESS He �0 140
1ST SESSION
To end the practice of imposing unfunded Federal mandates on State and
local governments and to ensure that the Federal Government pays
the costs incurred by those governments in complying with certain re-
quirements under Federal statutes and regulations.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
JANUARY S, 1993
Mr. CON`DIT (for himself, Mr. MORt1N, Mr. ROHRABACHER, Mr. PO,ln30, Mr.
Cox, Mr. PETE GERE\ of Texas, Mr. PORTER, Mr. LEwis of Florida,
Mr. ORTON, Mr. STEN-HOL11, Mr. BREwSTER, Mr. PENNY, Mr.
LkIIGHLIX, and Mr. PACKARD introduced the following bill; which was re-
ferred to the Committee on Government Operations
A
To end the practice of imposing unfunded Federal mandates
on State and local governments and to ensure that the
Federal Government pays the costs incurred by those
governments in complNring with certain requirements
under Federal statutes and regulations.
1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-
2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
4 This Act may be cited as the "Federal Mandate Re-
5 lief Act of 1993".
2
1 SEC. 2. FINDINGS AND PURPOSE.
2 (a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds and declares
3 that-
4 (1) unfunded Federal mandates on State and
5 local governments have become increasingly e_xten-
6 live in recent years;
7 (2) such mandates have, in many instances,
8 added to growing deficits in State and local budgets
9 and have resulted in the need for State and local
10 governments to increase revenue or curtail services;
11 and
12 (3) such excessive fiscal burdens on State and
13 local governments have undermined, in many in-
14 stances, the ability of State and local governments
15 to achieve their responsibilities under State and local
16 law.
17 (b) PURPOSE.—The purpose of this Act is to assure
18 that the Federal Government pays the total amount of di-
19 rect costs incurred by State and local governments in com-
20 plying with certain requirements which take effect on or
21 after the date of the enactment, of this Act under a Fed-
22 eral statute or regulation.
23 SEC. 3. FEDERAL FUNDING REQUIREMENT.
24 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not�6thstanding any other proVi-
25 Sion of law, any requirement under a Federal statute or
26 regoulation that a State or local government conduct an
•AR 140 IH
3
1 activity (including a requirement that a government meet
2 national standards in providing a service) shall apply to
3 the government only if all funds necessary to pay the di-
4 rect costs incurred _by the government in conducting the
5 activity are provided by the Federal Government.
6 (b) APPLICATION.—This section shall apply only to
7 requirements which take effect on or after the. date of the
8 enactment of this Act.
O
.RR 140 M
March 18 , 1993
"Co-sponsors of H.R. 140, the Federal Mandate Relief Act"
Moran (Virginia) Zeliff (New Hampshire)
Rohrabacher (California) Fawell (Illinois)
Pombo (California) Furse (Oregon)
Cox (California) Parker (Mississippi)
Geren (Texas) McKeon (California)
Porter (Illinois) Baker (California)
Lewis (Florida) Machtley (Rhode Island)
Orton (Utah) Castle (Delaware)
Stenholm (Texas) Sundquist (Tennessee)
Brewster (Oklahoma) Klug (Wisconsin)
Penny (Minnesota) Petri (Wisconsin)
Laughlin (Texas) DeLay (Texas)
Packard (California) Taylor (North Carolina)
English (Oklahoma) Huffington (California)
Gordon (Tennessee) Weldon (Pennsylvania)
Kaptur (Ohio) Calvert (California)
Inglis (South Carolina) Lehman (California)
Wynn (Maryland) Hutchinson (Arkansas)
Doolittle (California) Peterson (Minnesota)
Swett (New Hampshire) Cramer (Alabama)
Sarpalius (Texas) Taylor (Mississippi)
Ravenel (South Carolina) Kim (California)
Franks (New Jersey) Crapo (Idaho)
Hilliard (Alabama) Hoke (Ohio)
Lantos (California) Quillen (Tennessee)
Knollenberg (Michigan) Everett (Alabama)
Cunningham (California) Bonilla (Texas)
Barlow (Kentucky)
r
(� Kent City Council Meeting
Date June 1, 1993
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: OFFSITE OVERFLOW PARKING
2 . 16116Mmmy STATEM s recommended b the Public Works )
=- m
mmitt optio of Resolution No: ng to offsite
overflow parking This resolution establishes a City policy
encouraging sufficient onsite parking facilities and
discouraging offsite overflow parking; the resolution also
would allow staff to review with developers potential onsite
parking insufficiencies in new multi-family developments.
3 . EXHIBITS: Public Works Minutes and resolution
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (3-0 vote)
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 3G
that just by installing guardrails, the number of accidents may not,
be reduced but the severity of the accidents would be.
Bennett inquired where we would get the money from. Wickstrom
stated there was some unencumbered money in the Street Capital
the
Improvement Fund or the Council uestioned whether this would ould allocate some mney mhave
1994 budget process . McCarthy q
to be brought before the Budget Committee. Councilman White
remarked that he felt more comfortable having staff figure out the
e budget side of it to move the project along.
best way to handle th
blic
hat
Bennett commented that he had the same that there were more uareas sthat yrequired satlot
Mann did, but felt
more attention than this particular area, partly due to the fact
that there is a 25 mph speed limit and it is a bicycle recreational
corridor. Bennett noted that he wasn ' t 100% sure that it was his
responsibility to gamble with City money and felt that James Street
and other heavily-traveled areas were more critical as far as
safety is concerned. He continued that there were only so many
dollars to spend, and he would spend it elsewhere.
Mann approached Bennett and inquired whether he would be in favor
of installing guardrails on the most dangerous areas . Bennett
agreed and Mann amended his motion to direct staff to install
guardrails on the installment plan in the more critical areas and
ultimately doing the rest at some point in the future.
McCarthy questioned if the project was done in increments, was it
a small enough project where it would come out of the operating
budget opposed to budgeting $68 , 000 for capital improvements and
whether the project would be done one piece at time or if we needed
to get
a budget. Ed White staued kihe as
looking buire for a t
gadm process admitted he was
the project done as quickly
looking at what was more financially feasible.
Committee unanimously agreed to authorize -Public Works to install
guardrails in the more critical areas .
Parking Restriction Resolution
Brubaker explained that he had revised the draft for the Parking
olicy statements that
Restriction Resolution to include some p
overflow offsite parking constitutes an adverse environmental
impact. Sections 2 & 4 were also added with minor modifications
and all four sections essentially state that City streets should be
free of overflow parking and also reiterates the fact that it
causes an adverse environmental impact that should be discouraged.
Brubaker continued that when reviewing the Environmental Checklist,
the City' s responsible SEPA Official should consider the adverse
environmental impact caused to City right-of-ways if the potential
for overflow offsite parking on City streets exists as a
consequence of the proposed development.
4
Ed White stated what he was looking for was a statement from the
City that allows staff to provide input to developers which, in a
sense, would allow us to take a look at these developments and
inform same that they may need more parking because of a potential
overflow parking problem. White stated that if we know it' s not in
the Zoning Code, but there .are some areas here that we would like
to look at, without having the backing from Council or a policy
that basically says this , we're really looking at trying to
convince them. White said that 'in terms of a policy/resolution, it
would give staff the ability to approach the situation in a more
forceful manner when there are multi-families encroaching on
single-family areas .
White continued to say that the history on this problem came out of
parking/site distance coming out onto 110th Avenue SE from the
multi-family development . He said the city was getting complaints
about vehicles parking too close to the driveway and the people
exiting not having adequate site distance .
Committee unanimously approved the adoption of the Parking
Restriction Resolution .
RESOLUTION NO. _
A RESOLUTION of the City
Council of the City of Kent,
Washington, establishing a City
policy regarding offsite overflow
parking.
WHEREAS, the City, through its zoning code, has established
certain parking requirements for various uses and structures within
the City of Kent, which requirements establish minimum parking
standards ; and
WHEREAS, certain multi-family or high density structures do
not sufficiently provide for the regular onsite parking needs
caused by their developments, even though these properties may
comply with applicable codes and meet all minimum parking
standards; and
WHEREAS , in those instances where the vehicle parking areas
provided for do not accommodate the actual onsite requirements of
the development, an overflow parking situation occurs that
typically results in regular, long-term parking use of City right-
of-ways; and
WHEREAS, overflow parking on City streets, when caused by
insufficient onsite parking facilities, can burden the regulation,
maintenance and operation of City streets, thereby threatening the
health, safety and welfare of the City; and
WHEREAS, the threat to the public health, safety and welfare
that exists when overflow offsite parking occurs on city right-of-
ways constitutes an adverse environmental impact to the area
affected by the development; and
1
WHEREAS , it is appropriate to establish a policy that urges
istically accommodate all parking needs for
property owners to real
their properties. NOW, THEREFORE,
The City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, does hereby
resolve as follows:
Section 1. The City streets should, within reasonable limits,
be free from overflow parking caused by inadequate onsite parking
facilities in order to protect the health, safety and welfare of
the citizens of Kent in the regulation, maintenance and operation
of all city right-of-ways .
v
Section 2 . Overflow offsite parking on City right-of-ways
that is caused by inadequate onsite vehicular parking facilities
has an adverse environmental impact on the health, safety and
welfare of the citizens of the City of Kent by burdening the
regulation, operation and maintenance of City- streets.
Section 3 . Overflow offsite parking on city right-of-ways
that is caused by inadequate onsite vehicular parking facilities
shall be discouraged within the territorial boundaries in the City
of Kent.
Section 4 . When reviewing the environmental impact of any
proposed development within the City of Kent, the City' s
Responsible Official under the State Environmental Policy Act shall
consider the adverse environmental impact caused to City right-of-
ways if the potential for overflow offsite parking on city streets
exists as a consequence of the proposed development.
Passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of
the
City of
Kent, Washington, this day of
2
Concurred in by the Mayor of the city of Kent, this day
of 1993 .
DAN KELLEHER, MAYOR
ATTEST:
BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ROGER A. LUBOVICH, CITY ATTORNEY
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of
Resolution No. passed by the City Council of the City
day of , 1993 .
of Kent, Washington, on the Y
(SEAL)
CITY CLERK
PRKNRES2_ptk
3
Kent City Council Meeting
Date June 1, 1993
U L� Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: KENT CORNUCOPIA DAYS ORDTWANieEr
2 . MMARY ST OMINIM! As recommended by the Public Works
Committe , doption of Ordinance No. granting a street
o pa io permit to users, and authorizing the issuance of a
Street cupation Permit to Kent Lions Club for Kent Cornucopia
Days. This ordinance is a new standard street use ordinance
for all street closures. In previous years, Cornucopia Days
was covered under its own ordinance; however other organiza-
tions also request the use of streets for their functions. As
a result, the City has prepared a standard ordinance and a
standard Street Occupation Permit for Street Closures.
3 . EXHIBITS: Public Works Minutes and ordinance
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (3-0 vote)
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT• NO X YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS•
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION•
ACTION•
Council Agenda
Item No. 3H
contacting the service clubs and seeing if they really wanted to do
this. Bond remarked that there were six clubs agreeable to the
idea. Councilman White noted that most of the service clubs buy
pre-made out-of-a-catalogue signs, and requested that Bond make
this a top priority.
Brubaker questioned the fact that perhaps undesirable clubs may
choose to be included and thought maybe we should think generically
about how we could restrict the use. He inquired whether the
Rotary Club was a complete non-profit organization. White
concurred and added it was also a non-sectarian service club.
Councilman White suggested Ed White and Tom Brubaker get together
and work out the details and to check with the service clubs with
where and when they meet.
Kent Cornucopia Days Ordinance
Brubaker noted that this was a new standard street use ordinance
for all street closures. Ed White explained that in the past,
Cornucopia was normally covered as an ordinance action in that we
knew every year it was going to happen. However, there are other
organizations requesting to use the streets for other functions.
As a result, the City has come up with a standard ordinance and a
standard Street Occupation Permit for Street Closures . All action,
still has to go to Public Works Committee and through Council.
Once approved, they would apply for the permit.
Committee unanimously agreed to recommend adoption of the Kent
Cornucopia Days Ordinance.
Everson Annexation (60% Petition Annexation)
Widkstrom noted the location of the annexation area to be by S
218th Street, roughly in the middle of the City on the eastern
boundary and that the City has received and verified the 60%
petition for same. The next step would be for Council to accept it
and authorize staff to file the "Notice of Intent" with the
Boundary Review Board. However, prior to Council ' s action, the
SEPA process must be complete. Because of the time element, he
requested that the committee recommend that upon completion of the
SEPA process and subject to a DNS being issued, Council accept the
annexation petition and direct staff to file a "Notice of Intent" .
Jim White stated that the City was getting pockets (60 acres) of
people wanting to annex to the City and in that area it is
happening because of septic systems. Wickstrom noted that he
believed this was happening because of the county' s permit process
and the inability to get action from the County.
Mrs. Rust inquired about people wanting to be annexed to the City
and recalled that former Counc7ilman Steve Dowell had said that
annexations do not benefit the City financially because we do not
2
it
i
I
j
j
I'
ORDINANCE NO.
ton
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Kent, Washington,
relating to Kent Cornucopia Days ; authorizing the
issuance of a street occupation permit to Kent Lions
Club for a public festival ; specifying terms and
conditions for such street use and closing certain
streets in conjunction with said permit.
WHEREAS , Kent Cornucopia Days has been an annual
festival sponsored by the Kent Lions Club celebrating the
heritage of the Kent community; and
WHEREAS , the Cornucopia Days festival continues to grow
in size annually; and
WHEREAS, the Kent Lions Club desires to obtain a street
occupation permit pursuant to Kent City Code Chapter 6 . 08 and
further desires to seek closure of certain streets in downtown
Kent in conjunction with said permits. '
WHEREAS , Cornucopia Days is a result of the efforts of a
number of private volunteers, citizens, civic groups, and
nonprofit organizations; and
- 1 -
!I
�i
I
i
WHEREAS, the City of Kent is not the sponsor nor
operator of the Kent Cornucopia Days festival; and
WHEREAS , it is appropriate to clarify the rights,
responsibilities and relationships of those parties involved in
the Kent Cornucopia Days ' activities ; NOW THEREFORE,
THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS.
FOLLOWS :
Section 1 . The Public Works Director is hereby
authorized to issue a street occupation permit pursuant to
Chapter 6 . 08 of the Kent City Code from Thursday, July 15, 1993 ,
9 : 00 p.m. , until Sunday, July 18 , 1993 , 11 : 00 p.m. , for the
following described public areas and right-of-ways which will be
closed to normal vehicle traffic during the term of the permit
except as otherwise noted below:
(A) Meeker Street from 6th Avenue to Railroad Avenue
(4th Avenue tc remain open) ,
(B) 2nd Avenue from Meeker Street to Gowe Street,
(C) 1st Avenue from new Kent Library to Titus Street
with restricted access at 4th Avenue (Lowe Street to remain
open) ,
2 -
I,
i
�I
III
(D) 2nd Avenue from Gowe Street to Titus Street,
(with local access signs at Titus)
(E) 2nd Avenue from Meeker Street to Smith Street for
li the purposes of Saturday Market .
.I
(F) Municipal parking lot between Smith and Harrison
and 2nd and 4th Avenues; provided, however, that such closure
shall be for the purposes of Cornucopia Carnival from 6 : 00 a.m. ,
2 : 00 p.m. , Monday, July 19 ,
Thursday, July 13 , 1993 through 1993 . '
(G) 5th Avenue behind Kent Elementary for Grand Parade
and parade assembly; Saar Street north on 4th Avenue to James
Street and Borden Field, on Sunday, July 18 , 1993 from 1.1 : 00 a.m.
until 4 : 00 p.m.
(H) Smith Street between 1st Avenue and 4th Avenue for
the purposes of alleviating traffic flow to the Cornq�-,opia Days
Carnival and the Balloon Classic from 9 : 00 p.m. until 11 : 59 p .m.
on Friday, July 16 , 1993 , and Saturday, July 17 , 1993 .
Section 2 . The street use permit provided in Section 1
above shall be granted to the Kent Lions Club (hereinafter
referred to as the "User") and its successors and assigns . By
this permit, the User is authorized to conduct a public festival
on said public property and right-of-way, to erect booths,
conduct lawful and licensed games , provide entertainment, operate
or authorize food and beverage services, and conduct such other
activities consistent with a public festival at the times and in
accordance with the provisions in Section 1 .
3 -
it
I'
.I
III �
Section 3 . The permit to be granted hereby is
conditioned upon and subject to User' s satisfaction of the
following conditions and such other terms and conditions as may
be imposed by the Public Works Director pursuant to Chapter 6 . 08 :
1 �
l3_1 . LICENSES AND TAXES . The User shall be liable for, 4
`i and shall pay throughout the term of this use, all license and
fees covering the business and activities conducted on the
premises, and all unemployment insurance, social security,
workers ' compensation and other obligations applicable to its
activities, and otherwise fulfil], all fiscal obligations imposed
by law or contract.
3 . 2 . UTILITIES . The User, at the User ' s sole expense,
shall provide, or shall otherwise pay for, when due, all costs
for providing all utilities and other services and installation
occasioned by the User' s requirements . The City shall not be
liable for any injury, loss or damage caused by or resulting from
any interruption or failure of utility services due to any causes
whatsoever, except the City ' s sole negligence.
3 . 3 . LIABILITY.
3 . 3 . 1 . Indemnification: The User, its successors
or assigns shall indemnify, defend and hold the City harmless
from any and all claims, actions, damages and/or judgments
whatsoever arising out of any and all activity, use and
occupation of said public property and right-of-way pursuant to
the subject permit including claims arising by reason of
it I
- 4 -
I
I
�I
I �
I
i I
i
it
accident, injury or death caused to persons or property of any
kind unless caused by the City ' s sole negligence.
3 . 3 . 2 . Assumption of Risk: The placement and
storage of personal property on said public right-of-way by the
� User shall be the responsibility of, and the sole risk of the
User.
3 . 3 . 3 . Insurance: During the term of this permit
and any extension thereof, the User shall secure and maintain a
policy of standard form comprehensive general liability insurance
with an insurance company licensed to do business in the State of
Washington, providing protection and indemnification against any
and all claims for injury or disability to person, damage to
property or for loss of life, which may arise from or be related
to this activity or the permit granted herein, including the
liability of the City its officers, officials, agents or
employees for such to the User and any of the User ' s officers,
employees and agents, and any liability of the User as such to
the City, its officers, employees and agents, arising out of or
in connection with the occupancy and use of the public
right-of-way as well as any and all claims and risks in
connection with any acts or omissions performed by User by virtue
of the rights granted pursuant to this permit. Said policy
limits shall be in the amount of one million dol-lars ($1 , 000, 000)
for injury to or loss of life of any individual person; in the
aggregate for personal injuries suffered in each occurrence ; and
for property damage suffered in each occurrence. Said policy
must specifically name The City of Kent, its officers, employees
and elected officials as additional insured parties thereunder
5 -
i
i
i
and must stipulate that the coverages provided by said policy
shall not be terminated, reduced, or otherwise changed in any
respect without providing at least thirty (30) days prior written
` notice to The City of Kent. In any event, no termination,
reduction or change in coverage shall occur after June 16, 1993 ,
;I or 30 days prior to the scheduled event for which this permit has
I� been issued. Notwithstanding any provision herein to the
contrary, the failure of the User to comply with the provision of !
this section shall subject this Street Use Permit to immediate
1 termination without notice and without recourse by any person in
order to protect the public interest. The applicant shall
furnish a certificate of such insurance coverage to the City
prior to issuance of permit, and may be required, at the City ' s
discretion, to provide a copy of the entire insurance policy.
3 . 3 . 4 . Adjustments of Claims : The User shall
provide for the prompt and efficient handling of all claims from
third parties for bodily injury, property damage or theft arising
out of the activities of the User under this permit. The User
agrees that all such claims, whether processed by the User or
User ' s insurer, either directly or by means of an agent, will be
handled by a person with a permanent office in the Kent-Seattle
area.
3 . 4 . USE AND CARE OF PREMISES .
3 . 4 . 1 . General Condition: The premises shall at
all times be kept in a neat, clean, safe and sanitary condition,
and kept and used in accordance with the laws of the State of
Washington and ordinances of The City of Kent, and in accordance
- 6 -
I�
�I
�i
I
i
,I
with all authorized rules and regulations of the King County
Health Department, Kent Fire Marshal , Kent Building Inspector,
and other proper officers of The City of Kent, at the sole cost
and expense of the User. The User shall not permit any waste,
damage, or injury to the public property or right-of-way; shall
ii
not permit any objectionable noise or odor to escape or to be
. � admitted from said public areas or permit anything to be done j
upon said premises that in any way will create a nuisance..
3 . 4 . 2 . Alterations: The User shall not make, or
cause to be made, any alteration, addition or improvement in said
public right-of-way other than those authorized above without
first obtaining the written consent of the City for such work.
3 . 4 . 3 . Access : The City reserves for itself, its
officers, employees, agents and contractors, free access to said
premises at all reasonable times for the purposes of emergency
response and other public safety demands, inspection, cleaning,
or other City responsibilities .
3 . 5 . NON DISCRIMINATION. The User shall comply with
all federal , state and local laws and ordinances prohibiting
discrimination in employment or public accommodation with regard
to age, sex, race, color, creed, national origin, marital status
or physical or mental handicap.
3 . 6 . RELATIONSHIP. In no event shall the City be
construed, or held to have become in any way or for any purpose a
partner, associate, or joint venturer of the User or any party
associated with the User in the conduct of the User' s activities
I
- 7 -
II
II
�I
I
relating to Cornucopia Days . This permit does not constitute the
User the agent or legal representative of the City for any ,
purpose whatsoever.
3_7 . AMENDMENTS . The City expressly reserve the right
to amend the terms of this permit from time to time as may be
necessary to preserve the public health, safety and welfare.
Provided, however, that no amendment, alternation or modification '
of the terms or conditions of this permit shall be valid and
binding unless made in writing to the User within fourteen ( 14)
days of- the effective date of said amendment, alternation or
modification.
3 . 8 . NO WAIVER OF DEFAULT. The City does not waive
full compliance with- the terms and conditions of this permit by
acceptance of the permit fees . No waiver of default by the City
of any of the terms , covenants and conditions hereof to be
performed, kept and observed by the User shall be construed as,
or operate as, a waiver of any subsequent default of any of the
terms, covenants and conditions herein contained, to be
performed, kept and observed by the other party .
3 . 9 . SURRENDER OF PREMISES . At the expiration or
termination of this permit, including any extensions thereof,
whichever is earlier, the User shall quit and surrender said
premises , without notice and in as good condition as received at
commencement of the term, ordinary wear and tear uncontrollable
by the User excepted.
8 -
I
i
3 . 10 . CONSTRUCTION AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION. This street
use permit shall be construed under all the applicable laws,
statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations of the United States,
State of Washington, County of King and the City of Kent in case
of a dispute between the parties. Jurisdiction of any resulting
litigation shall be in King County Superior Court.
I
I If legal action is instituted, the User agrees to pay
all of the City ' s reasonable costs and attorney fees incurred in
connection therewith.
3 . 11 . The User shall not interfere with the City' s
maintenance and use of the right-of-way, or the operation of the
Kent Saturday Market or other licensed businesses and premises.
The User shall also be responsible for obtaining necessary
permits for use of property administered by the Department of
Parks and Recreation.
3 . 12 . The City of Kent, its agents and employees, will
perform no maintenance, repair work of any kind on User ' s
installations, equipment, or appurtenances without first
obtaining permission from the User. Provided, however, the City
may perform such maintenance, repair or work in an emergency.
3 . 13 . INVALIDITY OF PROVISIONS . Should any term,
provision, condition or other portion of this permit be held to
be inoperative, invalid or void, the same shall not affect any
other term, provision, condition or other portion of this permit;
and the remainder of this permit shall be effective as if such
- 9 -
i
I
I
i
term, provision, condition or portion had not been contained
herein.
Section 4 . FEES AND CHARGES
I
I
4_1. FEE. The fee for the above identified permit j
11 shall be twenty-five dollars ($25 . 00) payable in advance to the
City Treasurer at Kent City Hall , 220 4th Avenue South, Kent,
before July 3 , 1993 . A copy of
Washington 98032-5895 on or
User' s proof of insurance certificate shall be submitted at the
time this fee is paid.
4 . 2 . AUDIT. The User shall permit the City, as City
deems necessary, to inspect and audit in Kent, Washington at any
and all reasonable times, all pertinent books and records of the
User and any subcontractors or other person or entity that is it
connection with, or related to the User under this permit to
verify the accuracy of accounting records, including trust
accounts if any; and shall supply City with, or shall permit the
City to make, a copy of any books and records and any portion
thereof, upon the City ' s request.
4 . 3 . The User shall have the right to charge user fees
or festival permits for the areas described in Section 1, above .
The User shall also be granted the authority to charge user fees
or festival permits to street vendors and merchants within two
blocks of the area described in Section 1 above. The User' s
right to charge festival permit and user fees shall extend only
for the term of this street use permit, and shall not apply to
- 10 -
iI
j'
I1 I
I
mercha
nts and businesses with current business licenses within
the areas designated herein.
I
Section 5 . An authorized representative of user shall j
execute an agreement with the City confirming acceptance of the
I
fconditions herein. The Mayor is authorized to execute said
+ agreement and such other documents necessary to the
I! administration of this ordinance.
Section 6 . Two hour parking restrictions as provided in
Chapter 10 . 06 Kent City Code for the following streets are
eliminated during the period of Cornucopia Days, and shall not be
enforced during said period: Central Avenue to Union Pacific
Railroad and James Street to Willis Street.
Section 7 . A sufficient number of handicap parking
spaces shall be provided in close proximity to festival site on
2nd Avenue between Gowe St . and the post office driveway.
Section 8 . Any act consistent with the authority and
prior to the effective date of this ordinance is hereby ratified
and confirmed.
Section 9 . Effective Date. Pursuant to Leonard v.
Bothell , 87 Wn. 2d 847 ( 1976) , this ordinance shall take effect
and be in force five (5) days from the time of its final passage
as provided by law.
DAN KELLEHER, MAYOR
i
i
i!
�j
t '
�I
ATTEST:
BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK
I' APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ROGER A. LUBOVICH, CITY ATTORNEY
PASSED the day of , 1993 .
APPROVED the _ day of _ __ 1993 .
PUBLISHED the day of 1993 .
I hereby certify that this is a true copy Of
Ordinance No. , passed by the City Council of the City
of Kent, Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the City Of
Kent as hereon indicated.
(SEAL)
BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK
cornucop.ord
it - 12 -
Kent City Council Meeting
Date June 1, 1993
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: EAST HILL ANNEXATION -RAMSTEAD/SCHNEIDER
ANNEXATION (CITY PROPERTIES)
2 . U1MARY STA NTH__._ s recomm_e_nde_d by the Public Works
Committee uthorization for the Mayor to sign the 60% petition
or al e City's properties within the East Hill Annexation
area. In October of 1991, Council authorized the circulation
of a 60% petition for the subject annexation. While an actual
60% petition has not yet been received, the petitioner is still
pursuing same.
3 . EXHIBITS: Public Works Minutes, memorandum from Public Works
Director and vicinity map
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (3-0 vote)
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT• NO X YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 3I
Ed White stated what he was looking for was a statement from the
City that allows staff to provide input to developers which, in a
sense, would allow us to take a look at these developments and
inform same that they may need more parking because of a potential
overflow parking problem. White stated that if we know it' s not in
the Zoning Code, but there are some areas here that we would like
to look at, without having the backing from Council or a policy
that basically says this , we' re really looking at trying to
convince them. White said that in terms of a policy/resolution, it
would give staff the ability to approach the situation in a more
forceful manner when there are multi.-families encroaching on
single-family areas .
White continued to say that the history on this problem came out of
parking/site distance coming out onto Moth Avenue SE from the
multi-family development. He said the City was getting complaints
about vehicles parking too close to the driveway and the people
exiting not having adequate site distance .
Committee unanimously approved the adoption of the Parking
Restriction Resolution .
Ramstead/Schneider Annexation (City Properties
Wickstrom recalled that back in October 1991 , Council authorized
the circulation of a 600-. petition for this area . Initially,
Wickstrom said it was started by Mrs . Ramstead and then later by
Schneider Homes who is actively pursuing the annexation securing
signatures . Wickstrom stated that several properties are owned by
the City that were acquired by park purchases or through the 277th
Corridor right-of-way acquisition representing about 1 . 5 million
dollars worth of assessed value . The 60s needed is not in, but at
this point, the City is asking that Council authorize the Mayor to
sign the petition for the properties that we in fact own .
Bennett inquired when it comes to a vote if it was only voted on by
those people that own the 10% . Wickstrom stated that this was an
annexation by 60% petition where the petitioners seek signatures of
property owners within the area who have 60% of the assessed value.
Wickstrom noted that the City owns properties totaling 1 . 5 million
assessed value in the area which represents about 2% and the total
area is about $40 , 000 , 000 .
. Mann inquired whether this annexation was to move in the direction
of the 272th Corridor . Wickstrom stated that if the annexation
were to- occur, parts of the corridor would be in Kent. Mann then
inquired if ' we were acting in accord and was this the motivation
for the action. Wickstrom stated that the motivation was that the
developer and/or property owner is pushing the annexation and since
the City has properties in the subject area , we would just sign the
60% petition annexation for those parcels; the developer is doing
all the work. Mann further questioned whether that would be
sufficient to sway the annexation . Wic}cstrom noted that it was not
5
because city-owned properties only make up 2% and 58% more would
have to be secured .
Charlie Kiefer inquired about the SEPA review, the responsible
person involved, as well as the official name of the annexation.
Jim White stated that the SEPA Official was Jim Harris and the
official name was East Hill Annexation. Kiefer was concerned that
all those in the annexation area would not be published notified .
the neWickstrom
stated that the normal procedures are
s .
Bill Carleton commented that he lives near the Ramstead s property
and also wanted to be notified .
Kiefer inquired about the City ' s 2% and where we stand now.
Wickstrom noted that we were in the 50 to 60% range, that we are
not quite there because some of the signatures were beyond the 6-
month period and we had to .-start over in some cases . Wickstrom
noted that the 60% petition annexation was a State law requirement.
William Joy questioned how this annexation fit in with Auburn.
Wickstrom stated that it correlates with Auburn, however, they may
have a concern with the tail off of one parcel , but it' s within the
interim potential annexation boundary that Council approved May
18th. Councilman White commented that a lot of this was being
driven by the Growth Management Act which states that Cities should
provide services because they are the mechanism established by law
to provide them. As a result, white stated that the City was being
forced to budget money to do plans that we :,could normally not do;
plans must be completed by July 1994 . white noted there was no
great desire by Council or the Mayor to annex clear to Soos Creek
or to SE 285th, but when we receive petitions for annexation we
have to react to them and are almost. forced to annex.
Bill Carleton stated he had gone to a County meeting where they
discussed eliminating an intersection on 116th Avenue SE and making
it a major County arterial . Carleton stated, as a part of the
official meeting, a representative of the City' s Planning
Department came in with books, EIS statements and counter
statements which did not refer to 116th , but to the corridor . He
said they did not object to the City doing that , but they did
object to the fact that the corridor was an integral part of the
spur and they were tied together . Carleton mentioned the County
also discussed a 1 , 000-home addition in the same vicinity and noted
out of their areas would go to Kent-Kangley or
that people getting n the corridor and go al-', the way down to the
they would get
freeway which is already overcrowded .
In conclusion, Carleton suggested that the City of Kent could
d over
itself the "Oasis city" and ere stated
goi that if
f the our skpav y and the
everything out there,
we properties would go down in value.
Committee unanimously agreed to authorize the Mayor to sign the 60%
Annexation Petition for City-owned properties .
6
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
May 13, 1993
To: Public Works Committee
From: Don Wickstrom,"Director of Public Works
Re: Ramstead/Schneider Annexation
aka East Hill Annexation
Back in October - 1991, City Council authorized the circulation of
the 60% petition for the above subject annexation.
While an actual 60% petition has not yet been received, the
petitioner is still pursuing same. As noted on the attached map,
included therein are several properties that the City owns. Some
are recent acquisitions associated with the 272nd Corridor project
and some are older relating to prior City sewer, water, drainage or
parks projects.
Total assessed value of same is $1, 526 , 620 . 00 or 2% of the total
proposed annexation area. It' s the Public Works recommendation
that the Mayor be authorized to sign the 60% petition for all the
City' s properties within this annexation area.
ACTION: Authorize Mayor to sign 60% petition for all City
properties within the Ramstead/Schneider Annexation (aka
East Hill Annexation) .
T51
g
r� H%,// /�� I r y� G /,u/1 ,:�:,y<�j A�//r./i�' P.vr- ���� .} '�f -�l
//../ n����/� �/�/l,:r�..�/�i��/'=k:m7j�L//�i/�!� /r. f//r.����j�i'///���,. �2�r[Siw:.91d:':�:. .,a ,
gy, W,
rM W/
ri
RM
-fl
PROPOSAL BOJ
Kent City Council Meeting
Date June 1, 1993
Category Consent Calendar
V
1. SUBJECT: TRAFFIC SIGNAL REMODEL - 228TH & 84TH & SR167 RAMPS
2 . SUXHARY STA E— MNTo _As_ commended by the Public Works J
ittee, accept as comp ete the— contract
with e V Com any for a traffic signal remodel at 228th & 84th
& SR167 Ramps. F\,
3 . EXHIBITS: Public Works Minutes, memorandum from Public Works
Director and vicinity map
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (3-0 vote)
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION•
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 3J
Traffic Signal Remodel at 228th & 84th &_ SR167 Ramps - Acceptance
Wickstrom noted that the original bid was below bid limits, so the
city solicited for proposals from contractors. This contract is
complete and is ready for final acceptance.
Committee unanimously agreed to accept the project as complete.
Downtown Infrastructure
Due to the absence of Raul Ramos, Councilman White noted that he
had read the information submitted and it was fine.
Highway Paint Striper - Bid AcceptedPaint Striper - Bid Accepted
Committee unanimously recommended this bid be accepted and contract
awarded to Municipal Machinery for $28 , 536 . 00 .
Meeting adjourned at 6: 36 PM.
7
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
May 12, 1993
To: Public Works Comm ttee
From: Don Wickstrom, Director of Public Works
Re: Traffic Signal Remodel at 228th & 84th & SR167 Ramps
This project consisted of a traffic signal remodel, i. e. signal
head modifications, controller change, addition .of traffic loops,
pavement markings, and installed interconnect at 228th Avenue S &
84th Avenue S & SR167 Ramps.
Because the project was below the bid law limits, the department
solicited bids and awarded the contract on October 21, 1992 to The
V Company for the bid amount of $18 , 290 . 00 . The final construction
cost is $20, 590 . 00 . We are requesting that the project be accepted
as complete.
ACTION: Acceptance of the project as complete
1• _ ap
� � x
S 218TH \ S
ST
I stzl4���
N s
i.
INDUSTRIAL
\\ AREA _
n ST •222N1
S 222NUv
f
_ j
PROJECT LOCATION . 7 -
i-. o' 13 W
NORT >
N / KEN < r
T INTC 6 n r
W x n Fx F
228TH
S 228TH _ ST C .s 229 ST- ST
In
W N \ > < c
S 232ND
NOYAK- 8T
W 167
_ >
a g 94TH Cr S
P 2
2 W A< J3Ro
+ m <
r
COLE ST •t -'�'• Lc cwv
�t•ht:�;I :: 47'
z
0 0 !.:••.:r% 1.DR0N
n N �' WAY 6,14t ' < S.Z37TH PL
> W CLOU Y S z O a
•r. QEpRQE O < 4. a S 238TH.
n '
v z ? z z F > < < = a S 2 PL �...�
1 S 240 ST
z Es 3T z < Z
• y� I5111lI/F.\��� 4 KEHT W W c 4 - < ~
HI. 24 > < ¢ S 241ST ST 1
W -�- �•+ - SCHCIOL < E
> i Athletic ffd ST z
< x S 242ND'
< Plot EER 8 <
Z Z ST c
- M IL E M RA E ST
'AL'KF: S 243RI
r'It:l.tl • `� SST z z z y7 sr
w SMITH ST 4 aMITH tT Z s 1244TH •
t MEDICAL ST '•
•, . Z G &Z Z H WARD ACEN7E =`1� >
Z 11
aL- HARRISON . ST N WLHR4P ST Z b •lam .•/r•••4.'_1 yl
AMIES
Z ; ST•
W' MEEKER Z ST b O 8CHSO�OL M < � r
. I
4i ST (Aow wEILANO x S 246THub w iOWE S
Sla1° r ST 247TH P<
cirr HAU T < F, t'hpy\ TACOMA ST q` ST x x
L scH 516 b ,� < CHERRY C •^."1 �p k >
HILL ST `• . O1 s
C w n� �~ 1 \ _ E DEAN < ------ `�
W p > ST = W ST E MACIYN ST ;�..�i� `{�• n
n
�V (} Kent City Council Meeting
Date June 1, 1993
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: 3 -93 GROWTH MANAGEMENT ACT tGMA) GRANT --S-ERV=
AG COUNTY—
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Adoption of Resolution No. 43LY relating
to the 1992-93 Growth Management Act Grant Service Agreement
with King County. The Growth Management Act -�G� provides
funding to cities and counties that are required to plan under
the act, -svrch &_ ..� GMA funds are distributed to the City
of Kent through King County. This resolution approves the
agreement between the City of Kent and King County for the
distribution of 1992-93 funds in the amount of $34, 242 .
the-xervice--agreement trre-seWerel-exh}hits._ __
---ttmac ment-_I Gour4ty-7wide_-p l-anrving pol is-i-es work--program,
Attachment--2 fu-nding allocationsIxing--County
— Att-achment--3-,---pr-oprosed--GMA-process. The Planning Committee
approved the proposed service agreement on May 18, 1993 .
3 . EXHIBITS: Resolution, service agreement with attachments, and
City Council Planning Committee Minutes of 5/18/93
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Planning Committee (3-0)
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 3K
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION of the City of
Kent, Washington, relating to the
Growth Management Act funds_
disbursed by the State Department of
Community Development to King County
as pass through funds to the City of
Kent.
WHEREAS , the 1990 and the 1991 State Legislatures passed
the Growth Management Act (hereinafter the "Act") which requires,
among other things, that all jurisdictions in King County prepare
comprehensive plans in accordance with its provisions, that the
jurisdictions , plans be consistent, and that county-wide planning
policies be adopted in 1992 ; and
WHEREAS , funds were appropriated by the Legislature to
assist local governments in the implementation of the Act; and
WHEREAS, in the allocation of these funds, the Washington
State Department of Community Development has in turn, allocated
$1, 754 , 041. 00 in 1992-93 to assist in implementing the Growth
Management Act and requires that, in order to submit a grant
application, 60% of County jurisdictions, with 75% of the
population approve the Joint Regional Strategy for growth
management activities ; and
WHEREAS , in order to receive 1992-1993 grant funds under
the Act, the City approved all necessary elements under the Act and
an Interlocal Agreement has been executed with King County for the
distribution of those funds, and
WHEREAS, in order to receive the $34 , 242 . 00 allocated to
the City of Kent for 1992-1993 , the City must approve another
Interlocal Agreement with King County regarding the distribution of
the funds and accept the grant distribution formula and Joint
Regional Strategy as recommended by the King County Liaison Group
(an interjurisdictional group of planning, public works and finance
officials) ; NOW THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City agrees that in order to be eligible
for 1992-1993 Act funds, it shall perform the following tasks:
3
A. Authorize the Mayor to sign the Interlocal Agreement
with King County regarding the distribution of 1992-1993 Act grant
funds, in substantially the same form as "Attachment A: 'A Service
Agreement for the distribution of Certain Washington Department of
Community Development Grant funds under the State of Washington
Growth Management Act of 199011' (hereinafter the "Agreement")
attached hereto;
B. Perform the tasks specifically described in the
Agreement for the continued fund disbursements and in order to
comply with all applicable laws;
C. Participate and provide information and data as
requested to accomplish the 1992 Joint Regional Strategy Countywide
Planning Policies Work Program (Attachment 1 to the Agreement) ;
2
D. Accept the grant allocation formula which reserves
$482 , 000. 00 for region-wide efforts (Attachment 2 to the
Agreement) ;
E. Designate the King County Liaison Group to
coordinate the interjurisdictional work in the Joint Regional
Strategy (Attachment 3 to the Agreement) ;
F. Designate King County as the fiscal agent to:
submit the application to DCD for 1992-1993 Growth Management Act
grant funds on behalf of participating jurisdictions; receive DCD
grant funds to municipal jurisdictions according to the approved
allocation formula and to otherwise carry out its responsibilities
as further described in the Agreement.
Passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Kent, Washington this day of , 1993 .
Concurred in by the Mayor of the City of Kent, this
day of , 1993 .
DAN KELLEHER, MAYOR
ATTEST:
BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK
3
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ROGER A. LUBOVICH, CITY ATTORNEY
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of
Resolution No. passed by the City Council of the City of
Kent, Washington, the day of 1993 .
(SEAL)
BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK
9
gma.res
4
A SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR THE DISTRIBUTION AND ADMINISTRATION OF CERTAIN
WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT GRANT FUNDS UNDER THE STATE OF
WASHINGTON GROWTH MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1990
THIS AGREEMENT, signed this day of
199 by and between King County and the City/Town of
("the Municipal Jurisdiction").
WHEREAS, the Washington State Legislature passed the Growth Management
Act of 1990 and 1991 (Chapter 17), hereinafter referred to as "the Act," which
requires all jurisdictions in the County of King to prepare comprehensive
plans consistent with new guidelines; and
WHEREAS, the Act requires that jurisdictions prepare these plans in
cooperation with neighboring units of general government; and
WHEREAS, the State of Washington through the adoption and administration
of the Act will make funds available to local jurisdictions through the State
of Washington Department of Community Development, hereinafter referred to as
DCD, for expenditure during the 1992-1993 funding years; and
WHEREAS, the Act directs DCD to establish funding levels for planning
and technical assistance grants for counties and cities that plan under this
Act and DCD has allocated approximately $1.75 million dollars to King County
jurisdictions; and
WHEREAS, King County and ;the municipal jurisdictions within King County
have been designated together as a county region by DCD for the purpose of
receiving DCD funds; and
WHEREAS, DCD requires King County and the municipal jurisdictions within
King County to develop a regional work program, hereinafter referred to as a
"Joint Regional Strategy," for the 1993 calendar year and beyond for
implementation of the Act and for the purpose of receiving DCD funds and to
designate an institutional framework to coordinate the accomplishment of the
Joint Regional Strategy; and
WHEREAS, DCD requires King County and the municipal jurisdictions within
King County to develop an allocation formula for receipt of the DCD grant
funds within the county region and designate a fiscal agent to receive and
distribute DCD funds according to the approved allocation formula; and
WHEREAS, DCD requires that the Joint Regional Strategy and allocation
formula be approved by 60% of legislative authorities of the county and
municipal jurisdictions within King County representing 75% of the total
population of King County; and
WHEREAS, only King County and municipal jurisdictions which have adopted
the Joint Regional Strategy and have agreed to the allocation formula by
resolution, motion, or ordinance will be eligible to receive DCD grant funds;
and
WHEREAS, in 1991 and 1992 King County and municipal jurisdictions
entered into interlocal agreements for the distribution of DCD Growth
Management Act grant funds which included approving Joint Regional Strategies
and grant allocation formulas; and
WHEREAS, the King County Liaison Group, which consists of Planning
Directors, Public Works Directors and Finance Directors representing King
County, the City of Seattle, and other municipal jurisdictions within King
County, recommends the Countywide Planning Policies Work Program as the Joint
Regional Strategy and the grant allocation formula contained herein; and'
WHEREAS, King County has entered into a contract with DCD to serve as
fiscal agent for the distribution of grant funds among King County and the
municipal jurisdictions within King County; and
2
WHEREAS, in November 1992 the King County Council through the adoption
of Ordinance #10641, Section 91, appropriated DCD funds for distribution to
King County and the municipal jurisdictions within King County for the 1992-
1993 funding year; and
WHEREAS, King County and the Municipal Jurisdiction enter into this
Agreement pursuant to and in accordance with the State Interlocal Cooperation
Act, RCW Chapter 39.34, for the purpose of distributing and administrating DCD
funds and for the execution of activities in accordance with and under author-
ity of the Act;
NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THE FOREGOING CIRCUMSTANCES AND IN
CONSIDERATION OF THE MUTUAL PROMISES HEREIN, IT IS AGREED THAT:
I. GENERAL AGREEMENT
King County and the Municipal Jurisdiction agree to comply with the
provisions of the "Joint Regional Strategy," which is attached hereto as
Attachment 1 and is incorporated herein as is fully set forth, by under-
taking growth management activities, including coordination of planning
efforts to achieve consistency, the development of a public participa-
tion process, and undertaking other coordinated planning activities as
specified in the Growth Management Act of 1990 and 1991.
II. ENTITLEMENT
The parties agree that the allocation of funds appropriated by the State
of Washington Department of Community Development ("DCD") among King
County and the municipal jurisdictions within King County shall be
governed by the following provisions as outlined in the Grant Allocation
Formula, which is attached hereto as Attachment 2 and is incorporated
herein as is fully set forth:
A. By entering this Agreement the Municipal Jurisdiction is eligible
to receive a direct share, hereinafter referred to as a pass-
through, of DCD funds as calculated in the Grant Allocation
Formula, which is based on the following principles:
1. Of the total DCD grant to King County, W2,000 shall be
reserved for Countywide efforts.
2. The pass-through shall include a minimum amount of $10,000.
3. The remainder of the funds shall be allocated on a per
capita basis based on a proportional distribution of total
population with King County as determined in the June 1992
estimate by the State of Washington Office of Financial
Management.
4. If the Municipal Jurisdiction is partially within King
County and partially within an adjacent county, it shall
have its base amount adjusted based on the proportion of its
population which is located in King County.
B. King County shall distribute any unallocated funds in the same
manner as described in paragraph II(A)(2) above or in another
manner approved by King County and a minimum of nineteen (19)
municipal jurisdictions within King County. Together the popula-
tion of unincorporated King County and the approving municipal
jurisdictions must represent 75% of the total population of King
County.
C. This Agreement is contingent upon the adoption of a resolution,
motion, or ordinance by the Municipal Jurisdiction approving the
Joint Regional Strategy and Grant Allocation Formula for DCD grant
funds and of a municipal work program which outlines the Municipal
Jurisdiction's implementation of the Act or the Joint Regional
Strategy.
3
III. REIMBURSEMENT PROVISIONS
The parties agree that King County is the designated fiscal agent for
the distribution of DCD funds under the terms of this Agreement. Within
ten (10) business days after receiving each quarterly warrant from DCD,
King County shall issue a warrant to the Municipal Jurisdiction for an
amount equal to one quarter (to the nearest dollar) of the total amount
the Municipal Jurisdiction is entitled to receive according to the Grant
Allocation Formula.
IV. USE OF FUNDS: GENERAL PROVISIONS
A. Funds provided to the Municipal Jurisdiction under this Agreement
shall be used solely for activities undertaken to fulfill the
requirements of the Act and to implement the Joint Regional
Strategy.
B. The Municipal Jurisdiction agrees to conduct the appropriate
citizen participation activities as required by the Act, RCW
Chapter 36.70. Such activities shall include the broad dissemina-.
tion of proposals and alternatives, opportunity for written
comments, public meeting after effective notice, provisions for
open discussion, communication programs, information services, and
consideration of and response to public comments.
V. ROLE OF THE KING COUNTY LIAISON GROUP
The parties agree that tfe King County Liaison Group (Attachment 3),
which consists of the planning directors, public works directors, and
finance directors or their designees from King County, the City of
Seattle, and other municipal jurisdictions within King County, shall
serve as a joint forum for the review and recommendation of policy
matters and state requirements to the legislative authorities of King
County and the municipal jurisdictions within King County. The parties
hereby agree that the King County Liaison Group shall prepare for DCD an
annual regional progress report which describes accomplishments of the
Joint Regional Strategy.
VI. RESPONSIBILITIES AND POWERS OF THE MUNICIPAL JURISDICTION
The Municipal Jurisdiction shall have the following responsibilities and
powers:
A. The Municipal Jurisdiction shall propose to its legislative
authority a local work program which includes an examination of
its role in recognizing and addressing regional or county-wide
needs through a coordinated funding approach with King County and
other municipal jurisdictions.
B. The Municipal Jurisdiction shall prepare an annual progress report
in accordance with the primary objectives and requirements of the
Act, RCW Chapter 36.70. The Municipal Jurisdiction's annual
progress report shall be sent to the Office of the Manager, King
County Planning and Community Development Division, 707 Smith
Tower Building, 506 Second Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98104.
C. The Municipal Jurisdiction shall exercise its discretion in deter-
mining the use of its pass-through funds in a manner consistent
with the Act and the Joint Regional Strategy including the Munici-
pal Jurisdiction's local policies.
D. The Municipal Jurisdiction agrees to propose to its legislative
authority activities and budgets for inclusion in the implementa-
tion of the Joint Regional Strategy.
E. The Municipal Jurisdiction shall send representatives to partici-
pate actively in technical forums for the purpose of accomplishing
the Joint Regional Strategy.
4
F. The Municipal Jurisdiction shall prepare and submit to King County
for transmittal to DCD a short written description of high
priority growth management work program projects upon which the
Municipal Jurisdiction intends to begin work during the period
between July 1, 1992 and June 30, 1993. This description shall
include reference to work program projects which implement the
Joint Regional Strategy.
G. The Municipal Jurisdiction undertaking activities and/or projects
with DCD funds distributed under this Agreement retains full civil
and criminal liability as though these funds were locally gener-
ated.
H. The Municipal Jurisdiction shall fully comply with the State
Environmental Policy Act.
I. The Municipal Jurisdiction shall maintain accounts and records,
including personnel, property, financial, and programmatic
records, and other such records as deemed necessary, to ensure
proper accounting for all project funds and compliance with this
Agreement. All such records shall sufficiently and properly
reflect all direct and indirect costs of any nature expended and
services provided in the performance of this Agreement. These
records shall be maintained until June 30, 1994, unless a longer
retention period is required by law.
VII. RESPONSIBILITIES AND POWERS OF KING COUNTY
King County, by and through its employees, agents, and representatives,
agrees to:
A. Obtain and present to the King County Liaison Group all applicable
State and DCD policy guidelines, special conditions, and format
requirements related to the implementation of the Joint Regional
Strategy and related to the administration of the grant funds
distributed pursuant to the Act, RCW Chapter 36.70.
B. Prepare and present to DCD the annual progress report regarding
the implementation of the Joint Regional Strategy as required by
DCD pursuant to the Act, RCW Chapter 36.70.
C. Identify supplemental sources of funding to increase the ability
of King County and the municipal jurisdictions within King County
to carry out effective growth management activities.
D. Prepare reports, organize meetings and technical forums/work
groups as needed for the King County Liaison Group to assist in
the implementation of the Joint Regional Strategy.
VIII. GENERAL TERMS
A. This Agreement for the 1992-1993 fund distribution shall be
effective July 1, 1992 through June 30, 1993. The parties
acknowledge, however, that commitments to accomplish the Joint
Regional Strategy do not terminate with this Agreement. The
parties agree to use their best efforts to work with DCD to secure
additional funding beyond the 1992-1993 funding period and to
execute subsequent agreements.
B. The King County Council through the adoption of Ordinance #10641,
Section 91 appropriated DCD funds for distribution to King County
and the municipal jurisdictions within King County for the 1992-
1993 funding year;
C. It is recognized that amendments to this Agreement may become
necessary, and such amendment shall take place only when the
parties have executed a written addendum to this Agreement.
5
IX. EVALUATION AND MONITORING
A. The records and documents with respect to all matters covered by
this Agreement shall be subject to inspection, review, or audit by
King County so authorized or as requested by DCD during the
performance of this Agreement and until June 30, 1994, unless a
longer retention period is required by law.
B. The Municipal Jurisdiction agrees to cooperate with any monitoring
or evaluation activities conducted by King County that pertain to
the subject of this Agreement. The Municipal Jurisdiction agrees
to allow King County, DCD, the State Auditor, and/or any of their
employees, agents, or representatives to have full access to and
the right to examine during normal business hours and as often as
King County may deem necessary, all of the Municipal Jurisdic-
tion's records with respect to all matters covered by this Agree-
ment. King County and/or any of its employees, agents, or repre-
sentatives shall be permitted to audit, examine, and make excerpts
or transcripts from such records and to make audits of all
invoices, materials, payrolls, and record of matters covered by
this Agreement. King County will give advance notice to the
Municipal Jurisdiction in the case of fiscal audits to be
conducted.
C. The results and records of said evaluation shall be maintained and
disclosed in accordance with RCW Chapter 42.17.
X. HOLD HARMLESS
A. King County assumes no responsibility for the payment of any
compensation, wageJ, benefits, or taxes to or on behalf of the
Municipal Jurisdiction, its employees, or others by reason of this
Agreement. The Municipal Jurisdiction shall protect, indemnify
and save harmless King County, its officers, agents, and employees
from and against any and all claims, costs, and losses whatsoever
occurring or resulting from (1) the Municipal Jurisdiction's
failure to pay any such compensation, wages, benefits, or taxes;
and (2) the supplying to the Municipal Jurisdiction of work,
services, materials, or supplies by municipal employees or others
in connection with or in support of the performance of this Agree-
ment.
B. The Municipal Jurisdiction further agrees that it is financially
responsible for and shall repay King County all indicated amounts
following an audit exception which occurs due to the negligence,
intentional acts or failure for any reason to comply with the
terms of this Agreement by the Municipal Jurisdiction, its offi-
cers, employees, agents, or representatives. This duty to repay
King County shall not be diminished or extinguished by the prior
termination of this Agreement pursuant to Section VIII or Section
IX.
C. The Municipal Jurisdiction shall protect, defend, indemnify, and
save harmless King County and the State of Washington, their offi-
cers, employees, and agents from any and all costs, claims, judg-
ments, or awards of damages, arising out of or in any way
resulting from the negligent acts or omissions of the Municipal
Jurisdiction, its officers, employees, or agents. The Municipal
Jurisdiction agrees that its obligations under this subparagraph
extend to any claim, demand, or cause of action brought by or on
behalf of any employee of the Municipal Jurisdiction against King
County, its officers, agents, or employees, and includes any judg-
ment, award, and cost arising therefrom, including attorney fees.
King County shall protect, defend, indemnify, and save harmless
the Municipal Jurisdiction, its officers, employees, and agents
from any and all .costs, claims, judgments, or awards of damages,
arising out of or in any way resulting from the negligent acts or
omissions of King County, its officers, employees, or agents.
King County agrees that its obligations under this subparagraph
extend to any claim, demand, or cause of action brought by or on
behalf of any employee of King County against the Municipal Juris-
6
diction, its officers, agents, or employees, and includes any
judgment, award, and cost arising therefrom, including attorney
fees.
Claims shall include„but not be limited to, assertions that the
use or transfer of any software, book, document, report, film,
tape, or sound reproduction or material of any kind, delivered
hereunder, constitutes an infringement or any copyright, patent,
trademark, trade name, or otherwise results in unfair trade
practice.
D. The Municipal Jurisdiction shall provide King County with evidence
of general liability insurance with limits of no less than E1
million per occurrence to provide coverage for claims for injuries
to persons or damages to property which may arise from, or in
connection with the performance of work hereunder by the Municipal
Jurisdiction, its agents, representatives, employees, or subcon-
tractors. If the Municipal Jurisdiction is self-insured for this
requirement, a certification of self-insurance shall constitute
compliance with this section.
XI. TERMINATION
A. This Agreement may be terminated without cause by King County, in
whole or in part, prior to the date specified in Section VIII,
upon thirty (30) days advance written notice of the termination to
the Municipal Jurisdiction.
B. If at any time during the term of this Agreement, either (1) the
State of Washington terminates King County's DCD grant status, or
otherwise acts to terminate, reduce, modify, or withhold its grant
funding to King County, or (2) any necessary appropriations of
funds for the Municipal Jurisdiction are not made to King County
by the State of Washington, or are revoked or withheld, or (3) the
King County Council does not appropriate DCD funds for distribu-
tion to the Municipal Jurisdiction, then King County may terminate
this Agreement upon giving twenty (20) days' written notice to the
Municipal Jurisdiction. The parties acknowledge that, except as
otherwise specifically provided for herein, King County shall in
no event be responsible for the payment of any funds to the Munic-
ipal Jurisdiction. King County, as the official fiscal agent,
shall have the authority and responsibility to ensure that upon
termination of this Agreement, any remaining DCD funds are made
available in the manner described in paragraph II(C) above and in
accordance with state regulations, or returned to DCD.
C. Nothing herein shall limit, waive, or extinguish any right or
remedy provided by this Agreement or law that either party may
have in the event that the obligations, terms, and conditions set
forth in this Agreement are breached by the other party.
XII. REDUCTION OF FUNDS
In the event that there is a reduction of funds by the State of
Washington or DCD, and if such funds are the basis for this Agreement,
then King County may unilaterally terminate all or part of this
Agreement, or King County and the Municipal Jurisdiction may reduce
their respective scopes of work or budgets under this Agreement.
7
XIII. SEVERABILITY
In the event any term or condition of this Agreement or application
thereof to any person or circumstances is held invalid, such invalidity
shall not affect other terms, conditions, or applications of this
Agreement which can be given effect without the invalid term, condition
or application. To this end the terms and conditions of this Agreement
are declared severable.
XIV. RECAPTURE PROVISION
A. In the event that DCD elects to recapture funds from either King
County or the Municipal Jurisdiction for failure to expend grant
funds in accordance with state law and/or the provisions of this
Agreement, King County reserves the right to recapture such funds
on behalf of DCD in an amount equivalent to the extent of noncom-
pliance.
B. Such right of recapture shall exist for a period not to exceed
three (3) years following termination of this Agreement. Repay-
ment by the Municipal Jurisdiction of such funds under this recap-
ture provision shall occur within thirty (30) days of demand.
Funds recaptured by King County shall be returned to DCD. In the
event that King County is required to institute legal proceedings
to enforce the recapture provision, or is required to participate
in legal proceedings as a result of the Municipal Jurisdiction's
noncompliance with the provisions of this Agreement, or is
required to reimburse the State of Washington for the cost of
legal proceedings,sthen King County shall be entitled to reim-
bursement of its costs from the Municipal Jurisdiction, including
reasonable attorney's fees.
XV. NONDISCRIMINATION
There shall be no discrimination against any employee or independent
contractor paid by any funds which are the subject of this Agreement or
against any applicant for such employment because of race, religion,
color, sex, age, sexual orientation, handicap, or national origin. This
provision shall include, but not be limited to the following: employ-
ment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment, advertising, lay-off.
or termination, rates of pay or other forms of compensation, and selec-
tion for training.
The Municipal Jurisdiction and any independent contractor paid by funds
which are the subject of this Agreement shall comply with the require-
ments of Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended.
XVI. RIGHTS TO OTHER PARTIES .
It is understood and agreed that this Agreement is solely for the bene-
fit of the parties hereto and conveys no right to any other party.
XVII. GOVERNING LAW AND FILING
This Agreement shall be construed and enforced in accordance with, and
the validity and performance hereof shall be governed by, the laws of
the State of Washington. This Agreement shall be filed with the city
clerk of the Municipal Jurisdiction, the King County Records and Elec-
tion Division, and the State of Washington Department of Community
Development.
B
XVIII. ADMINISTRATION
A. King County's representative shall be
Address:
Phone:
B. The Municipal Jurisdiction's representative shall be
Address:
Phone:
XIX. ENTIRE AGREEMENT/WAIVER OF DEFAULT
The parties agree that this Agreement is the complete expression of the
terms hereto and any oral representations or understandings not incorpo-
rated herein are excluded. Both parties recognize that time is of the
essence in the performance of the provisions of this Agreement. Waiver
of any default shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any subsequent
default. Waiver or breach of any provision of the Agreement shall not
be deemed to be waiver of'any other or subsequent breach and shall not
be construed to be a modification of the terms of the Agreement unless
stated to be such through written approval by King County, which shall
be attached to the original Agreement.
KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON MUNICIPAL JURISDICTION
King County Executive Signature of
Designated Official
Official Title
City or Town
APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
approved as to form only by _
King County Prosecuting Attorney Official Title
per memo dated November 16, 1992
c\ords\agent
Attachment 1
Countywide Planning Policies Work Program
1992 1993
TASK. A S . p N D - J ,F -.M:...A,. M.r J--J :_-.
I. "rERL%l "MOLE
Raral hrterim 7.06129
Mir®Densities in Urban Areas
Aayssary and Mamdm-brW HostQtg
2.CO S
REQUEZEMEN' IS MIS Scope Demblanent or
or Rbrk Draft SEIS FL al SETS
Foadatkm&Emaiovmeat Analvss z;>:; -,.,�;,.,.
Popolatiao Distrilration/ t
Tagus Net Dweffing Units G
Employment Tames 1 z G
Centm Desiffiation
Urban Cedes G
Mmnfarha ng CentersA I ' y G
Rural Areas
Rural Character TF G ' G
Urban Growth Arras for Rm-al Cities Cr i G
Rural Manual 3
3
TrMyortation
Develop Coordiaated Los Standards A.---G i G
Reassessaieut of Land Use
r� a
Affordable A si.o
Afford"Hoasiag TF f J G
&momk Development
GMPC Policies for Cam"ide Role TF_ tiG G
Repatut!lndustri Siting Policy .TF S ;`
Urban Areas
Potential Anuaatim Areas for Cities a
Model hda3ocal Agreement for
Potential a®aatim Arras
Process for Disb�BRB _.
Re&aal Finaciag Strategies S �i
Deveiop CooarrOMry Management C—.t C r
Systu —�
OPEO Spwe Map —�
Critical
Critical Areas Tedaw-A Ca®ttee }—_
Smog Pabfic Capdai Facilities —�
3.MBLiC INVOLVEMENT
Public hrrolvenww
4.ORD iA.NCE REn jgEMEhTS
F%Cal analysis S
SELS S . n c
Technical Review of"Live"Study —A -G---
Areas
I WA
3I' Ta4tFarne
nv y y
as rvr:
Attachment 2
Growth Management Act Grant,1992-93 Allocations to King County Jurisdictions
King County-countywide allocation S1,754,041 Base $10,000
Amount reserved for countywide efforts • (5482,000) 0212AI93
Amount for distribution among jurisdictions $1,272,041 0250 PM
twit B:GMA93GRT
1992 Gran[SS Grant is Difference
Jurisdiction Population Percent Base Per Capita in 1993 in 1992 1992-1993
cans : 1851 ' 0 :'.Si0,000 1113 :. 51113 ..$3f;097 19
Auburn 34,260 2.19% $10,000 20,608 $30,608 $52,098 (S21490
.
auz!!ri>i; .. : ..-:: o 02 sloot)o .. 17t s�, n.. s.3ozx :.::.:..: (s .::.:
284
Bellevue 88,580 5.66% S10,o00 53,2M $63,2M $88,498 (525204
Tact Yliaauond....;;.: . f,520 Q 10°Gi .. S10,000..:. 914 310914. S3Q......
929N.
Bothell" 12,860 0 82% $9,676 7,736 $17,412 $37,371 ($1%,959
Snncu> 38.208 44% SIQ,000 Z2 983 $3Z 983 S0 �32;9Bi
........ .... ........
Carnation 1,277 0 08% $10,000 768 $10,768 $30,769 (S20,001
Glydc Bill::..' .... .. 2 984 019% SI0,000 ; 1,793 SI1,793 531;911 jS2o; 1..
Des Moines 18,170 1.16% $10,000 10,930 $20,930 $41,572 (520,642
. .-
ts-
SIO,000 1880 371,880 531938 (520058
Enumclaw 8,760 OS6%... ...........$10,000 5,269 $15,269 $34,899 ($19620
F46 cra ayWWI
72 350 4.62%! 410,000 43,52 $53 521 S77,002 (5z3 48I
.... ..
Hunts Point 515 0.03% $10000 310 $10,310 $30,262 (S19,952
Itasgnah ........... d,918 514,918 S35,I63 (S20W
Kent 40,300 2.58% $10,000 24,242 S34242 $56,342 ($22,100
Y[ng Coot ty 494 373 %160% 510,000 297,380 S307,380.. .. - 5384 281 (576,901
Kirkland 41,390 2.65% $10,000 24,897 $34,897 $56,968 (522,071
LakeFomc,Puk 3535 023%i 510,000 2,i26 S1z,126 532;611 (S2{1, :.
Medina 2980 0.19%i 310,000 1,793 S11793 $31,905 ($20112
=cr Isis ud 21J210 1363;' SI0,000 12 758 SZ1,758 S44 043 (S21
dton•• 710 0.05% $1,271 427 $1,696 $4,267 (Sd,569
Natmandy P..ark G 860 0.443' SI0,000 ' : 4,126 514126 534;410 (520281
North Bend 2,610 017% $10,000 1,570 $11,370 $31,652 (S20082
Pac�ttc
3,043 0 32%; S1Q,004... 3 033 513,033 S33,d31
Redmond 39,040 2.50% $10,000 23,484 $33,484 S54,883 ($21399
Rcatou g3;D90 275%.; $10,000 25,920 535,920 $58574 (522,654
.. . ..
SeaTac 22,830 1.46% $10,000 13,733 523,733 S45136 (S21,403
Scituk..,..., ::'.. . 522 000 33 37%<' 310,000 313 999 5323 999 5375 033 (551;03
Skykomish 265 0.02% $10,000 159 $10,159 $30,109 ($19,950
Siuogaulmlo :.,,, I�30 0.10%;; ;510,000 420 SIO>920'.. 530;953 (StOp3..
Tukwila 14,6M 0.94% $10,000 8,812 S18,812 $39,673 ($20,861
Woodmvtllc $200 052% $l000Q ' 4,933 514,933 50.. 514,M
.:
Yarrow Point 965 0.06% $10,000 580 $10,580 $30,569 ($19,989
Count "de'Faads 0 548200o S332000 S15Ufl0U
TotalS330947 S941,094 $1,754.041 S2290.068 553602
Grant Disfnbutiori!3f Allot aced bT,BauCus>
King County 494,373 3160% $10,000 $297�380 $307,380 $384,281 ($76,901
Scattk .......:;.. ........5?2000. ;- 3337% _. . Si0,004 _..; 5313,999 S...-..4 S375A33 E 1Jd.
Suburban 549,127 35 04% $466,421 S271,741 S640,662 $1196,754 (S558,092
Coun tdc Feuds 5482 000. $332,0(j0 SI50000
Total 3'364 00 100% `:S486421 S883.120 S1754.041 52290;068 $536.
• Countywide a0ocatim derived by adding up estimted costs for SES(SIS2,000),public inohement(W.000)and fecal anallais($60,000)
`1.5200,000 is reserved in Countywide Allocation for datf work To be didributed baud as folbws:S60,000 King County,S30,000 ME-IRO,S70,000Suburbao Cbm and W,000 for Seth
Suburban Cron wiU be responsible far determining Lndmg dictn'cation fortbe M,000 in Ca tywide Allocatim br stiff work with m emphasis m providing addilonzl finds to runt cilia_
"BotbcU(96.76%)and Milton(1271%)recei.e a proportionate share of the base amount,bared on the potion of populatim in KmgCourty.
NOTE: Coda to be billed per causes in 1993 inchrde meeting space and refreshmcrts,and printing cons.
Attachment 3
PROPOSED GMA PROCESS
GMPC
Liaison Group
(Open)
GMPC Staff
Affordable Rural FLqu SEIS Stag'
Housing Character Task Force Advisory Work
Task Force Task Force Group Groups
LAffordable Regional
ousing Financing
rk Group Work
Group
a
Transportation L
j
Lj
Sewer WL
Group/ ��; Concurrency Water
Work Group LevServiceTecbniral Work Group Work Group Sroup Forum
LIAISON GROUP: GMPC Staff;
Open participation with core group nchiding Metro and PSRC Designated by Caucuses
Balance of dam,cities, FUNCTIONS&RESPO]r UELITIF_S:
geograpfacal perspectives encouraged Provide bista ncal perspective and discipimary balance in
Agendas set by GMPC Staff Team GMPC process
Pro" and After liaison Group review,coordinate products of staff Work
iata-disaplinary tams for Groups and Task Forces,coordinate srLeduks and information
mformahion and pa&cy dacmvon exbange with and between Task Faces and Work Groin.
Dev&p recomm®datiom Bad ahernatives for GMPC reTiew
-�7--`_7 gGMPC Sta$� and action
Coordinate work of Task Forces with GMPC scbednless
�R.=: GMPC Staff Lead "; Review Task Face reco®andaboas and provide
t Larsen additional input to GMPC as appropriate on compatwity
= of recommendations and impacts on Countywide Phmming
" Brief elected officials and ensure tm ely advice to caucuses and
GNl[1.
1'�ffPbyNc'1 r�cas
�=5ioaldbr
—$fnor7drryJr�:bslaocedaibrt�tr _ � '
4GMPC Sluff Lead Role
Coreansm bonder
Commwicatw betnveen caucuses
Facaaeor of Liaison Group and GINIPC Staff Team
Prepares ageMdas for Ranson Group,GMPC Staff Team,and GMPC
Primary staff to GMPC
Forward mujorky and minority Opinions,
CITY COUNCIL PLANNING COMMITTEE MINUTES
MAY 18, 1993
PAGE 3
1992-93 GROWTH MANAGEMENT ACT (GMA) GRAMT - SERVICE AGREEMENT WITH KING
COUNTY (F. Satterstrom)
Planning Manager Fred Satterstrom reported the Growth Management Act
provides funding to cities and counties that are required to plan under
the Act, such as Kent. GMA funds are distributed to the City of Kent
through King County. This agreement is between the City of Kent and King
County for the distribution of these funds for the 1992-93 period. He
explained the service agreement is an updated version of the 1991-92
agreement which the City and County signed in March 1992 . Satterstrom
reported the funding level for Kent in the 1992-93 agreement is $34, 242,
approximately $22 , 000 less than one year ago. He said, overall, growth
management funding from the state is down 54% since funding first became
available in 1990. Manager Satterstrom gave an explanation of the three
attachments: Attachment 1 - Countywide Planning Policies Work Program,
Attachment 2 - Funding Allocations/King County Cities, and Attachment 3 -
Proposed GMA Process. Councilmember Johnson MOVED and Chair Orr SECONDED
a motion to recommend approval of 1992-93 Growth Management Act (GMA)
Grant Service Agreement with King County to be brought to the full
council on June 1, 1993 by resolution. Motion carried. Staff was asked
to call Jim Bennett to receive his approval so the item could be placed
under the consent calendar.
dV-
Kent City Council Meeting
Date June 1, 1993
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION APPOINTMENT
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Confirmation of the Mayor' s appointment
of Tony Ladner to the Kent Human Services Commission. He will
replace Marvin Eckfeldt, who filled the religious category and
whose term expired. Mr. Ladner' s appointment will continue to
January 1, 1996.
3 . EXHIBITS: Memo from Mayor Kelleher
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Mayor Kelleher
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ None
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 3L
MEMORANDUM
TO: JUDY WOODS, CITY COUNCIL ESIDENT
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: DAN KELLEHER, MAYOR --
DATE: MAY 25, 1993
SUBJECT: APPOINTMENT TO KENT HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION
I have recently appointed Mr. Tony Ladner to serve as a member of the Kent Human Services
Commission. Mr. Ladner, who is a City of Kent resident, serves as Executive Director of the Renton
Housing Authority, and is familiar with human service type issues through his affiliation with the
Lion's Club, Salvation Army and Auburn Elks Club.
Mr. Ladner is active in St.Philomena's Catholic Church and will replace Marvin Eckfeldt whose term
expired. He will fill the religious category and his term will continue to 1/1/96.
1 submit this for your confirmation.
DK:jb
V'
rb� v Kent City Council Meeting
Date June 1, 1993
G Category Other Business
1. SUBJECT: 272nd/277 CORRIDOR - ROAD IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTS/Y
-indent
i-t-ion
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Lindental Meadows and Julie's Addition
are plats abutting the 277th Corridor alignment along 116th
Avenue SE. The Public Works Committee has recommended that the
Public Works Director be authorized to sign the Lindental
Meadows Agreement and the Julie' s Addition Agreement. By these
agreements, the City would be an agent acting on behalf of the
developer and the City would build a minimum road during the
plat development, which would later fit into alignment with the
corridor project. The Developer would pay the City the equiva-
lent cost which would have been incurred had they constructed
the streets in accordance with the County' s approved plat
requirement.
3 . EXHIBITS: P lic Works Committee Minutes, memorandum from
Pu lic Works Director, vicinity maps, and developer
agr ements
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: ublic Works Committee 2-1 vote
(Committee, Sta.
Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL IMPACT: NO X YES
FISCAL PERSONNEL N TE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember _moved, Cauncilmember_ seconds
that the Public Works Director be authorized to sign the
Lindental Meadows/City Agreement upon finalizing the details
therein,
and
that the Public Works Director be authorized to sign the
Julie ' s Addition/City Agreement upon finalizing the details
therein. � evAvvetl" Se-cu ,, p&J- c[arv1;-,J
DISCUSSION: Wrt k AkckkA� �V r,p
ACTION• TAA`V1 CA 1
Council Agen a
Item No. 4A
PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE
MAY 19, 1993
_ PRESENT: DON WICKSTROM JIM BENNETT
ED WHITE PAUL MANN
JOHN BOND CHARLIE KIEFER
TIM LaPORTE WILLIAM JOY
TONY McCARTHY BILL CARLETON
TOM BRUBAKER PEGGY HANIS
JIM WHITE MR. & MRS . RUST
272nd 277th Corridor - 116th Ave Lindental Meadows Agreement
116th Ave/Julie ' s Addition Agreement
Wickstrom stated that approximately a month ago the City had
executed an agreement with the Plat of Lindental on the east side
of 116th Avenue SE. He noted that the two plats being discussed
tonight were on the west side across the street from Lindental .
Essentially, the agreement is that they pay their share of what
they would have had to pay under the county Design Standards in
building the road.
Committee voted 2-0 to authorize the Public Works Director to sign
the 116th Avenue/Lindental Meadows Agreement and the 116th
Avenue/Julie ' s Addition Agreement after the final details are
completed and after signature by the owners of each respective
plat. (Mann voted no. )
Rotary Sian
(No one was in attendance from Rotary, so Councilman Jim White
attempted to explain the facts and/or requests as best he could. )
White stated that Rotary wanted to place the traditional "Rotary"
wheel and a sign indicating the day and place where their meetings
are to be held. No locations were available, however, White
recalled there were three or four different locations in mind.
White mentioned that if the City allowed this request to one
service club and the rest of the service clubs followed, that maybe
the City could create something the clubs could put their emblems
on. Ed White noted that John Bond had been working on several
different structures that have small roofs on them and areas where
several organizations could post signs or information on.
Jim White stated that he would not want to see this request end up
being a huge project, but wondered if there was any value in
1
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
April 30, 1993
TO: PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE
FROM: DON WICKSTROM
INDENTAL MEADOWS
RE: DEVELOPMENTT OF IAGREEME E' S ADDITION, L
NT/2277TH STREET AT OF LCORRIDOR PROJECT
There are several new plats that are in final design or
construction stages that border 116th Ave. S. E. within the City' s
water/sewer area but just outside of the current City limits.
These
process for
years and developments
have
thus vested before the t curgrent moratorium several
affect.
Other such plats which have received preliminary approval from King
County include Lindental, Lexington Square and Little Bend.
Unfortunately, because of the timing of the plat applications and
the years between them, King County BALD approved a road alignment
for 116th Ave. S . E. , which was neither horizontally or vertically
consistent. For example, the road right-of-way had several jogs in
it and the vertical profile required of one plat was significantly
different of the plat fronting the street on the opposite side.
After the City Council directed Engineering staff to prepare the
road establishment plans for submittal to King County last
September, our staff reviewed the King County plat requirements in
this vicinity. After many meetings and`much negotIation with the
plat property owners and King County, a coordinated alignment of
116th Ave. was drawn with the concurrence of the County Roads
Division and Building and Land Development.
This coordinated alignment will allow the 277th Street Corridor
Project to be built with essentially no reconstruction or removal
of the plat improvements.
If this was not coordinated and each plat owner built their portion
of 116th Ave. , it would all end up being torn up and completely
reconstructed when the Corridor was built.
In summary, this agreement for the coordinated road provides the
County and the City with the option of widening and overlaying the
road ' in the future with very minimal reconstruction costs and
eliminates the possibility of having to tear up and remove the
newly constructed improvements.
The key points of the agreement are as follows:
o The plat owners will have their engineer redesign the plans
for a coordinated 116th Ave. alignment.
o The owners will pay the City the costs for the 116th Ave. S.E.
road improvements fronting their plat that they would have had
to pay on their own. Then the City will build the coordinated
road for them.
o The City will pay the additional costs of the higher road
alignment with the wider shoulders.
Action requested: Authorize the Pubic Works Director to sign the
agreement with the owners of the plat of Julie' s Addition and the
plat of Lindental Meadows after agreement details are completed and
after signature by the owners of each respective plat.
D257
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of
19 by and between the City of Kent, a
Washington municipal corporation ("City") , and
( "Owners") , who are
the owners and "developers of certain real property located in
unincorporated King County, Washington ("Lindental Meadows") , which
property is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference.
D °WITNESSETH
Y,t"CC I
WHEREAS , Owners received preliminary plat approval for their
proposed subdivision from King County Building and Land Development
("County" ) on or about 19_; and
WHEREAS , as a condition to receiving final approval from King
County, the County required Owners to dedicate a portion of their
property for a southerly extension of 116th Street SE along the
East border of their property, which street extension is described
in the proposed Plat of Lindental Meadows ; and
WHEREAS, this same condition also required Owners to improve
the 116th Street SE extension to County standards; and
WHEREAS, the City has plans to construct a roadway (the
11272/277 Corridor") in -King County that will encompass the same
alignment of 116th- Street SE that the County required the Owners to
dedicate and improve; and
WHEREAS , the County' s road improvement requirements for 116th
Avenue S . E. where originally designed for a minor access street
with a low speed limit; and
LINDENTAL MEADOWS/277 CORRIDOR CONTRACT--Page 1 of 6
WHEREAS, the city has planned its 272/277 Corridor to
accommodate a forty-five (45) mile per hour design speed; and
WHEREAS, the City, the Owners and the County all agree that
the least disruptive and most cost efficient approach to developing
the 116th Street SE extension would be to construct the extension
in a manner and at a .grade consistent with the City Is design ,
standards for the 272/277 Corridor; and
t
WHEREAS, the City has agreed to pay for those SE 116th Street
extension improvements, to the extent they exceed the requirements o
of the Owner' s approved 116th road plan, that will enable the
street to be built in a manner and at a grade consistent with the
city ' s 272/277 Corridor design standards ; and
WHEREAS, the City, as a financial participant, must adhere to
local and state laws pertaining to public works projects ; and
WHEREAS , the Owners and the City have determined that the
Owners will prepare construction plans and obtain permits and
approvals for the 116th Street SE project; and
WHEREAS , the Owners and the City have determined that the
City, because of its familiarity with applicable public works laws,
ordinances and regulations, should administer and construct the
116th Street SE extension project and should have the authority to
act for the Owners and make decisions for the Owners subject to the
terms and conditions expressed below.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows :
AGREEMENT
1 . Scope of Work. The scope of work contemplated for this
project to construct an extension of SE 1.16th Street from the north
LINDENTAL MEADOWS/2T7 CORRIDOR CONTRACT--Page 2 of 6
border of the proposed Plat of Lindental Meadows to its south
y JA 0 LJ v`
border is -dese-r b-ed" in Exhibit C, which is attached hereto an
incorporated herein by this reference .
2 , Contract Administration. (a) The City shall be
responsible for the 116th Street SE extension contract drawings, a
plans, specifications, estimates, contract documents, studies and
all other necessary documents. The City shall advertise the
project for public bids and the City shall enter ` into a
construction contract between the City and the lowest responsible
bidder. The contract shall be administered under the direction of
the City and at the expense of the City and the Owners in the
manner and in the amounts hereinafter set forth in this agreement.
(b) All plans, drawings, specifications, estimates of
costs, contract documents and special provisions for the project
work, including any amendments thereto, shall be subject to the
prior written approval of the parties as set forth in this
agreement.
3 . Construction. (a) The City shall construct or cause to
be constructed the project in accordance with the plans, drawings,
specifications and special provisions referred to above. All
construction costs , as well as the performance of all other work
required in connection with the project, shall be paid for by the
City and Owners in the manner and in the proportions hereinafter
set forth in this agreement.
(b) To the extent allowed by applicable law or
ordinance, all plans and contracts relating to this agreement shall
be subject to the approval of the parties .
LINDENTAL MEADOWS/277 CORRIDOR CONTRACT--Page 3 of 6
(c) The construction contract shall be limited to a
maximum of sixty (60) working days after issuance of the Notice to
Proceed.
4 . Costs and Expenses. The costs and expenses of the
project construction shall be based on the quantities set forth iqo
Exhibit D, attached hereto and incorporated herein by
reference; actual unit prices shall be determined upon award of then
project bid to the lowest responsible bidder. The determination o6
project construction costs and expenses , upon award to the lowest o
responsible bidder, shall also determine the total amounts to be
paid by the Owner for project construction, and the Owner shall not L—J
be liable for any amounts in excess of those determined costs and
expenses.
5. Permits and Approvals . The - owners shall obtain all
necessary permits and other approvals from the county and all other
regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over the project.
6 . Easements and Property Acquisition. The Owners agree to
dedicate, by separate document in a form to be approved by the
city, a ten foot (10 ' ) wide strip of property for right-of-way
along 116th Street SE as described in Exhibit B, which is attached
hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
7 . Indemnification. (a) Each party shall defend, indemnify
and hold the other party harmless from any and all claims,
injuries, damages , losses or suits, including all legal costs and
attorney fees, arising out of or in connection with the performance
of this agreement to the extent such claim, injury, loss or suit is
attributable to the comparative fault or negligence of that party.
(b) The provisions of this ;ection shall survive the
expiration or termination of this Agreement .
LINDENTAL MEADOWS/277 CORRIDOR CONTRACT--Page 4 of 6
g . Records . The City shall keep detailed records during the
performance of the contract work and all applicable warranty
periods that substantiate all project costs and shall make them
available to Owners, during regular business hours, in the event
that Owners should request to audit the project. --�
agreement shall be
uc
g . Disputes/Applicable Law. This `
construed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State a—
of Washington. In the event of any dispute between the parties `tom
herein which cannot first be settled by the decision of the City,
both parties agree to resolve such dispute exclusively under the
jurisdiction, venue and rules of the Superior Court of King County,
Washington.
10 . Severability. If any term, provision, condition or other
portion of this agreement, or its application to any person, is
held to be inoperative, invalid or void, then the same shall not
affect any other term, provision, condition or other portion of
this agreement or its application to any person.
11. Notices . All notices given by either party to the other
party shall be in writing and may either be delivered personally or
may be deposited in the United States Mail , postage prepaid,
Certified mail , addressed as specified in the signature page
hereof, or to such other respective addresses that either party may
from time to time designate in writing. Notices sent by mail shall
be deemed to have been delivered whenproperly mailed; the postmark
affixed by the United States Post office shall be conclusive
evidence of the date of mailing . If delivered by mail , an
additional three (3 ) post office business days shall be added to
any applicable notice period.
(Signature Page on following page. )
LINDENTAL MEADDWS/277 CORRIDOR CONTRACT--Page 5 of 6
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have caused this
the day and year first hereinabove
agreement to be executed
written. APR 1 4 10^3
CITY OF KENT OWNER(S)�
by DON E. WICKSTROM -
Public Works Director
NOTICES SHALL BE DELIVERED TO:
City of Kent - -
Director of Public Works
220 Fourth Avenue South
Kent, Washington 98032-5895
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ROGER A. LUBOVICH, City Attorney
PUBPRIVK;mdN -
LINDENTAL MEADOWS/277 CORRIDOR CONTRACT--page 6 of 6
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
PLAT OF LINDENTAL MEADOWS
The South half of the Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of
the Southeast quarter of Section 29 , Township 22 North, Range 5
East, W.M. , in King County, Washington; EXCEPT that portion thereof
deeded to King County for road; AND EXCEPTALSO he South
100 feet of
tion of
the West 130 feet of said Section 29 ;
Tract 10, unrecorded plat of the East half of the Southeast quarter
and portion of South half of Northeast quarter of Section 29 ,
Township 22 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington)
EXHIBIT "B"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
PLAT OF LINDENTAL MEADOWS
RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR 116TH AVENUE S.E.
The West 18 feet of the East 38 feet of the South half of the
Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter
of Section 29 , Township 22 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , in King
County, Washington.
p o
\ O N N
\ O
p C'' S
o
.r\, to
W
aLn
no
�J 1
J
'r3 es:.Q" a a
u a \
IW I
I I z +3 \\\\
I p
Iln \ \
w
� X
W
N
WI w 'o
w '1
:In o
¢ 0 81 z R
a I R
w I �
~ \ i I 4 �a •
I Y Z
o3F
I II R
z O
00
rn o
w a- =V r S n x J
wa
c- Ion (j 0 W
Z - �— Q 0
--------------` 4 O p o : o' Id z
Q'
— — 2-7 --- J
--� /---- I.90 ;! w w
z = (n O
W v F
I—
�.e,_ Q
y zr I $ J _� X ¢Qa
OF—
tL-/ I . I
O —Z . . L I I U
;, Him-9Z,--'3'S ° 0
0
v O Q
-- z c 0 -- t
N I
a +
yw� n
00 O R��1 0
n
ro o M •,
N
O
II
\ � I
� \ I
EXIMIT 1101 ®RAFT
,-P2 1 !'� 19,93
CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE FOR 116TH AVE S.E.
FOR PLAT OF LINDENTAL MEADOWS
The following cost estimate is based on a 40mph design speed and
the previous- planned improvement approved by King County:
Item Estimated Estimated
No. Description Quantity Unit Price* Cost
1 Gravel Borrow 1100 tons 8 . 00 $8, 800
2 Crushed Surfacing 450 tons 12 . 00 51400
3 A.C. Pavement Cl. "B" 120 tons 35 . 00 41200
4 Unsuitable Foundation 800 C.Y. 8 . 00 61400
Excavation
5 Raise Sanitary
Manholes to Grade 16 l . f. 100 . 00 11600
6 Hydroseeding,
Fertilizing and 15000
Mulching - 1500 s . f. 0 . 05 750
Subtotal Construction $27 , 150
7 Construction staking for 116th Ave. S . E. 1, 750
Total $281900
* Unit prices are estimated. Actual costs shall be based on
the lowest responsible bid. The estimated prices listed above
shall be used for any items which are not included in the
construction contract.
The Owner agrees to pay the City the ' full amount of the actual
construction costs based on the quantity f igures above and the unit
bid prices of the lowest responsible bidder .
For items which will not be bid for the City interim road section,
the Owner agrees to pay the cost shown above for the quantities
listed, for each of these items .
The Owner agrees to pay the total of this amount (which shall be
re-calculated after bid opening using the actual bid prices) within
2 weeks after notification of the final amount by the City.
For purposes of this agreement the following constitutes
definitions of the listed bid items:
-
Exhibit "D Cont ' d AFT
l anla
f1� \ � '�f f'J V`J
1-. Gravel Borrow: Supply and compaction of imported bankrun
material meeting City Standard Specification Section 4-02
compacted to 95% of the maximum dry density including
hauling and watering.
2 . Crushed surfacing: Supply and compaction of crushed
surfacing top course and base course meeting Section 9-
03 . 9 (3) of the 1991 WSDOT/APWA Standard Specifications
compacted to 95% of the maximum dry density.
3 . A.C. Pavement, Class "B" : The grade of paving asphalt
shall be AR-4000 . Tack coat shall be Emulsified Asphalt
SS-1. Paving work shall meet the requirements of Section
5-04 . 3 of the 1991 WSDOT/APWA Standard Specifications.
4 . Unsuitable foundation excavation: This item shall
include excavating loading, and disposing of the
material .
5 . Raise Sanitary Sewer Manholes to Grade: Excavate and
remove existing manhole cone, ring and cover. Install
precast riser sections, reinstall the cone, ring and
cover and adjust manhole to finish grade. See WSDOT
Standard Plan B-23a for details .
6 . Aydroseeding, Fertilizing and Mulching: Reference
Section s-01. 3 of the Kent Standard Specifications for
work included in this item.
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of
, 19 by and between the City of Kent, a
Washington municipal corporation ( "City" ) , and
( "Owners" ) , who are
the owners and developers of certain real property located in
unincorporated King county, Washington ( "Julie ' s Addition") , which
property is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference.
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, Owners received preliminary plat approval for their
proposed subdivision from King County Building and Land Development
("County") on or about , 19_; and
WHEREAS, as a condition to receiving final approval from King
County, the County required Owners to dedicate a portion of their
property for a southerly extension of 116th Street SE along the
East border of their property, which street extension is described
in the proposed Plat of Julie ' s Addition; and
WHEREAS, this same condition also required Owners to improve
the 116th Street SE extension to County standards; and
WHEREAS , the City has plans to construct a roadway (the
11272/277 Corridor") in King County that will encompass the same
alignment of 116th Street SE that the County required the Owners to
dedicate and improve; and
WHEREAS, the County ' s road improvement requirements for 116th
Avenue S . E. where originally designed for a minor access street
with a low speed limit; and
JULIE-S ADD'N/277 CORRIDOR CONTRACT--Page 1 of 6
WHEREAS , the City has planned its 272/277 Corridor to
accommodate a forty-five (45) mile per hour design speed; and
WHEREAS, the City, the Owners and the County all agree that
the least disruptive and most cost efficient approach to developing
the 116th Street SE extension would be to construct the extension
in a manner and at a grade consistent with the City' s design r)
P-11-1
standards for the 272/277 Corridor; and
WHEREAS, the City has agreed to pay for those SE 116th Street
extension improvements, to the extent they exceed the requirements
of the Owner' s approved 116th road plan, that will enable the
street to be built in a manner and at a grade consistent with the
City' s 272/277 Corridor design standards ; and
WHEREAS , the City, as a financial participant, must adhere to
local and state laws pertaining to public works projects ; and
WHEREAS , the Owners and the City have determined that the
Owners will prepare construction plans and obtain permits and
approvals for the 116th Street SE project; and
WHEREAS, the Owners and the City have determined that the
City, because of its familiarity with applicable public works laws ,
ordinances and regulations, should administer and construct the
116th Street SE extension project and should have the authority to
act for the Owners and make decisions for the Owners subject to the
terms and conditions expressed below.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:
AGREEMENT
1 . Scope of Work. The scope of work contemplated for this
project to construct an extension of SE 116th Street from the north
JULIE'S ADD-N/277 CORRIDOR CONTRACT--Page 2 of 6
r
border of the proposed Plat of Julie' s Addition to its south border
is :�devcribcRd'" in Exhibit B, which is attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference.
2 . Contract Administration. (a) The City shall be
responsible for the 116th Street SE extension contract drawings,
plans, specifications, estimates, contract documents, studies and
all other necessary documents. The City shall advertise the
project for public bids and the City shall enter into aC" :
construction contract between the City and the 'lowest responsible
bidder. The contract shall be administered. under the direction ofc 7
the City and at the expense of the City and the Owners in the`
manner and in the amounts hereinafter set forth in this agreement.
(b) All plans, drawings, specifications, estimates of
costs, contract documents and special provisions for the project
work, including any amendments thereto, shall be subject to the
prior written approval of the parties as set forth in this
agreement.
3 . Construction. (a) The City shall construct or cause to
be constructed the project in accordance with the plans, drawings,
specifications and special provisions referred to above. All
construction costs, as well as the performance of all other work
required in connection with the project, shall be paid for by the
City and Owners in the manner and in the proportions hereinafter
set forth in this agreement.
(b) To the extent allowed by applicable law or
ordinance, all plans and contracts relating to this agreement shall
be subject to the approval of the parties.
JULIE'S ADD'N/277 CORRIDOR CONTRACT--Page 3 of 6
(c) The construction contract shall be limited to a
maximum of sixty (60) working days after issuance of the Notice to
Proceed.
4 . Costs and Expenses. The costs and .expenses of the G�
project construction shall be based on the quantities set forth in T>
Exhibit C, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this rJ'
u-)
reference; actual unit prices shall be determined upon award of the o
project bid to the lowest responsible bidder. The determination ofQ
project construction costs and expenses, upon award to the lowest'"_
responsible bidder, shall also determine the total amounts to be
paid by the .Owner for project construction, and the Owner shall not
be liable for any amounts in excess of those determined costs and
expenses.
5. Permits and Approvals . The Owners shall obtain all
necessary permits and other approvals from the County and all other
regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over the project.
6 . Indemnification. (a) Each party shall defend, indemnify
and hold the other party harmless from any and all claims,
injuries, damages, losses or suits, including all legal costs and
attorney fees, arising out of or in connection with the performance
of this agreement to the extent such claim, injury, loss or suit is
attributable to the comparative fault or negligence of that party.
(b) The provisions of this section shall survive the
expiration or termination of this Agreement.
7 . Records. The City shall keep detailed records during the
performance of the contract work and all applicable warranty
periods that substantiate all project costs and shall make them
JULIE'S ADD'N/277 CORRIDOR CONTRACT--Page 4 of 6
available to Owners, during regular business hours, in the event
that Owners should request to audit the project.
8 . Disputes/Applicable Law. This agreement shall be
construed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State LJ—
of Washington. In the event of any dispute between the parties
herein which cannot first be settled by the decision of the City, d
both parties agree to resolve such dispute exclusively under the L =�3
jurisdiction, venue and rules of the Superior Court of King County,
v
Washington. GL
9 . Severability. If any term, provision, condition or other
portion of this agreement, or its application to any person, is
held to be inoperative, invalid or void, then the same shall not
affect any other term, provision, condition or other portion of
this agreement or its application to any person.
10 . Notices. All notices given by either party to the other
party shall be in writing and may either be delivered personally or
may be deposited in the United States Mail , postage prepaid,
Certified mail , addressed as specified in the signature page
hereof, or to such other respective addresses that either party may
from time to time designate in writing. Notices sent by mail shall
be deemed to have been delivered .when properly mailed; the postmark
affixed -by the United States post Office shall be conclusive
evidence of the date of mailing. If delivered by mail, an
additional three (3 ) post office business days shall be added to
any applicable notice period.
(Signature Page on following page. )
JULIP S ADD'N/277 CORRIDOR CONTRACT--Page 5 of 6
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have caused this
agreement to be executed the day and year first hereinabove
cfl
C"
written.
G -a
CITY OF KENT OWNER(S)
0
by DON E. WICKSTROM —
Public Works Director
NOTICES SHALL BE DELIVERED TO:
City of Kent -
Director of Public Works -
220 Fourth Avenue South -
Kent, Washington 98032-5895
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ROGER A. LUBOVICH, City Attorney
PUBPRIVK.juL
JULIE'S ADD'N/277 CORRIDOR CONTRACT--Page 6 of 6 - --
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
PLAT OF JULIE' S ADDITION
The North half of the Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of
the Southeast quarter of Section 29 , Township 22 North, Range 5
East, W.M. , in King County; Washington; F,XCEPT that portion thereof
deeded to King County for road.
(ALSO KNOWN AS portion of Tract 9 , unrecorded plat of the East half
of the southeast quarter and portion of South half of Northeast
quarter of Section 29 , Township 22 North, Range 5 East, W.M. in
King County, Washington. )
f=
yW uco
Ny, � u
T ti m O
m cc O
v y�
N yl
N
0137
os SSE. 2P6TH )ST. -- -
c�5
S.E.--26 5-TH Pt:— o M
>' o
� D
I D
n D x A Z x 1� --�J
�J O m rnrn m D usl I' 1 ----' -- --
T COD
CD 0
D003
S.
r� zli o>
o z
� o
z z � I , � I - �•. � Y i
L— IT,
c r4,; In
Cz oi6
m
�aSS I
N I I A O
T O
MI
O Z
Ot �
= x
Z 1
I
NT '
a'
O
O
J\ fX R
= o S 1Y
r eIV
r o��
(SR�jy
5 f Npt.�1 0 �,
DRAFT
EXIMIT 11c"
APR !i j -9a3
CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE FOR 116TH AVE S .E.
FOR PLAT OF JULIE' S ADDITION
The following cost estimate is based on a 40mph design speed and
the previous planned improvement approved by King County:
Item Estimated ' Estimated
No. Description Quantity Unit Price* Cost
1 Gravel Borrow 5200 tons 8 . 00 $41, 600
2 Crushed Surfacing 450 tons 12 . 00 5, 400
3 A. C. Pavement Cl . "B" 120 tons 35 . 00 4 , 200
4 36" CMP Culvert 15 l . f . 70 . 00 1, 050
5 Raise Sanitary MHs 7 1 . f 100 . 00 700
6 Raise 12" Water Main
(Where >6 ' Depth) 245 l . f. 30 . 00 7 , 350
7 Raise 8" Force Main 245 l . f . 20 . 00 4 , 900
(Where >6 ' Depth)
8 Hydroseeding 15 , 000 s . f . _0--1-0- o, a --1-,-500-
Subtotal Construction $661-700
Io �9' Construction staking for 116th Ave. S . E. 1, 750
Total $681450
* Unit prices are estimated. Actual costs shall be based on
the lowest responsible bid. The estimated prices listed above
shall be used for any items which are not included in the
construction contract.
The Owner agrees to pay the City the full amount of the actual
construction costs based on the quantity figures above and the unit
bid prices of the lowest responsible bidder.
For items which will not be bid for the City interim road section,
the Owner agrees to pay the cost shown above for the quantities
listed, for each of these items .
The Owner agrees to pay the total of this amount (which shall be
re-calculated after bid opening using the actual bid prices) within
2 weeks after notification of the final amount by the City.
Exhibit "C" Cont 'd DRAFT
For purposes of this agreement the following constitutes
definitions of the listed bid items :
1. Gravel Borrow: Supply and compaction of imported bankrun
material meeting City Standard Specification Section 4-02
compacted to 95% of the maximum dry density including
hauling and watering.
2 . Crushed surfacing: Supply and compaction of crushed
surfacing top course and base course meeting section 9-
03 . 9 (3) of the 1991 WSDOT/APWA Standard specifications
compacted to 95% of the maximum dry density. _
3 . A. C. Pavement, Class "B" : The grade of paving asphalt
-shall be AR-4000 . Tack coat shall be Emulsified Asphalt
SS-1. Paving work shall meet the requirements of Section
5-04 . 3 of the 1991 WSDOT/APWA Standard Specifications.
4 . 36" CMP Culvert: Furnish and install corrugated steel
culvert pipe, gage to be determined by design engineer.
The pipe shall be coated with protective treatment 1 .
Pipe and treatment shall meet the requirements of Section
9-05 . 4 of the 1991 WSDOT/APWA Standard Specifications.
� C Kent City Council Meeting
Date June 1, 1993
1 Category Bids
1. SUBJECT: HIGHWAY PAINT STRIPER
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: The bid opening was held on May 5th with
five bids received. The low bid was submitted by Municipal
Machinery in the amount of $28, 536. 00. The Public Works
Committee has recommended that this contract be awarded to
Municipal Machinery.
3 . EXHIBITS: Public Works Minutes and memorandum from Public
Works Director
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (3-0 vote)
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: f� � /� .
Councilmember moves, Councilmember VUD-Od seconds
that the contract for Highway Paint Striper be awarded to
Municipal Machinery in the amount of $28, 536 . 00.
DISCUSSION: _
ACTION•
Council Agenda
Item No. 5A
at 228th & 84th & SR167 Ramps - Acceptance
Traffic Signal Remodel
Wickstrom noted that the original bid was below bid limits, so the
City solicited for proposals from contractors. This contract is
complete and is ready for final acceptance.
Committee unanimously agreed to accept the project as complete.
Downtown Infrastructure
Due to the absence of Raul Ramos, Councilman White noted that he
had read the information submitted and it was fine.
Highway Paint Striper - Bid Accepted
Committee unanimously recommended this bid be accepted and contract
awarded to Municipal Machinery for $28 , 536 . 00 .
Meeting adjourned at 6 : 36 PM.
7
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
May 19, 1993
To: Public Works Comm- ttee
From: Don Wickstrom, Director of Public Works
Re: Highway Paint Striper
Bid opening was held May 5 , 1993 with five bids received. The low
bid was submitted by Municipal Machinery, Inc. in the amount of
$28 , 536 . 00 .
BID SUMMARY
Municipal Machinery $ 28 , 536 . 00
Morton International 30 , 493 . 00
M. B. Companies 32 , 200 . 00
EZ Liner Industries 32 , 935 . 00
Sahlberg Construction Equipment 41, 900 . 00
Equipment Rental ' s Estimate $ 37,514.86
ACTION: Recommend this bid be accepted and contract awarded to
Municipal Machinery.
MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 19th, 1993
TO: Don Wickstrom, Public Works ector /
FROM: Jack Spencer, Fleet ManagerQZc� +C �[/
THRU: Tim Heydon, Operations Mana r
SUBJECT' Bid Results for New Highway Pain Striper
On May 5th, 1993 , Equipment Rental received bids for a Palletized
Paint Striper to replace Unit #153 . This was approved in the 1992
Budget and the funds were carried over until 1993 . The Capital
Outlay is enclosed.
The bid results, not including tax, are listed below:
1. Morton International Morton Highway Marker $27, 900 . 00
00
Salem, Oregon- 97302 opt #2 polew gun
comm 450 . 00
503-364-2909 p
825
Opt #3-footage counter 1, 318 . 00
$30, 493 . 00
00
2 . EZ Liner Industries EZ Liner Paint Striper $29 ' 5225 . 00
Orange City, Iowa opt #2 410. 00
712-737-4016 Opt #3 2 , 500 . 00
$32 , 935 . 00
3 . M. B. Companies M. B. Model H. P. 320 $32 , 200 . 00
1-800-558-5800 No Bid Bond Received
4 . Municipal Machinery EZ Liner Model AL1202 $25, 636. 00
Boise, Idaho 83704 opt #2 450 . 00
350 . 00
208-322-4800 Opt #3 2 , 100 . 00
$28 , 536 . 00
5 . Sahlberg Construction M. B. Company
$39 , 587 . 50
Equipment _ Pavement Marker
Opt #1 937 . 50
Kent, Washington 1, 375. 00
Opt pt #2 Standard
Opt #3
$41, 900. 00
I recommend we award the bid to Municipal Machinery, Inc. of Boise,
Idaho, the lowest bidder. We have had a demonstrator model of this
machine at our shop for inspection and it meets all of our
requirements.
JS/map
B:ER012
jt ry
J�t.t.n
CITY OF KENT
1992 APPROVED CAPITAL OUTLAY PURCHASE FORM
ACCOUNT # 510-48E-5548-6400 EQUIPMENT RENTAL
1 . DESCRIPTION OF ITEM(S) APPROVED:
APPROVED AMT:
REPLACEMENT VEHICLE '
49,711.00
#153 - 1976 UNIMASCO PAINT MACHINE Psi° po ID( 1�6 r i2�1�1l0,1�
c �P tru�K P' '�' ' 37 51il. &(o
2• REQUEST TO USE BUDGET FOR ALTERNATE ITEM:
EXPLANATION:
3. ESTIMATED USEFUL. LIFE: —
4. ESTIMATED SALVAGE VALUE:
5. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (REMARKS)
APPROVAL:
PREPARED BY: PRISCILLq SHEA. .k �� ►V � - DATE:_1/21/92_
DEPARTMENT HEAD: `U �"''ti�'d " J DATE: 1 �� �'
CITY ADMINISTRATOR DATE:
ATTACH ORIGINAL PLUS ONE COPY TO PURCHASE ORDER.
CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS
A.
MCCARTHY,TONY / KENT70/AD - HPDesk print.
-----------------------------------------
Subject: 6/1 ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
Creator: Tony MCCARTHY / KENT70/AD Dated: 01/06/93 at 0949 .
TO: MAYOR KELLEHER, COUNCIL PRESIDENT WOODS AND COUNCIL MEMBERS
THE GOLF CONTRACT WITH KEITH SANDEN AND SSMD WAS SIGNED ON MAY 26TH SUBJECT
TO AN INVENTORY COUNT ON JUNE 1ST THAT WILL DETERMINE THE FINAL BUYOUT AMOUNT.
SSMD HAS SELECTED 19 OF THE 32 CITY GOLF EMPLOYEES WHO WANTED INTERVIEWS TO
BE PART OF THEIR TEAM. THE CITY HAS BEEN ABLE TO FIND POSITIONS FOR 3 OF THE
8 FULL AND REGULAR PART TIME EMPLOYEES AFFECTED BY THE TRANSITION. THE
NON SELECTED EMPLOYEES WILL RECEIVE A ONE MONTH SEVERANCE PACKAGE. THE
GOLF MAINATENANCE SUPERINTENDENT HIRING PROCESS IS CONTINUING FOLLOWING A
MEETING LAST WEEK WITH THE NORTHWEST MAINTENANCE ASSOCIATION WHO WILL ASSIST
US IN OBTAINING SOME NORTHWEST APPLICANTS . AS A FINAL NOTE, I HAVE ASKED
KEITH SANDEN TO ATTEND ALL PARK COMMITTEE MEETINGS TO KEEP THE COUNCIL
INFORMED ON THE OPERATION.
WITH THE COUNCIL DECISION FOR ONE ORGANIZATION FOR THE PERMIT PROCESS ON MAY
18TH, ADMINISTRATION BEGAN A SEARCH FOR AN INTERIM DIRECTOR. FIVE PEOPLE
WERE INTERVIEWED ON MAY 26TH. AN APPOINTMENT MAY BE ANNOUNCED AT THE 6/1
MEETING PENDING REFERENCE CHECKING AND CONTRACT NEGOTIATION. IT IS ANTICIPATED
THAT THE DIRECTOR WILL PERFORM IN A CONSULTING CAPACITY WITH THE TOP PRIORITY
BEING GETTING THE BACKLOG OUT AND ENHANCING CUSTOMER SERVICE. OVER THE LIFE
OF THE PROJECT, THE CONSULTANT WILL ASSIST IN DEVELOPING A PERMIT TRACKING
SYSTEM AND IN DEFINING THE LONG TERM DIRECTION OF THE PERMIT PROCESS. WHILE
CONSULTANT CONTRACT IS PROCEEDING, THE CITY WILL BE LOOKING AT BEGINNING
ThE PROCESS FOR A PERMANENT RECRUITMENT.
UPCOMING EVENTS
7/16-18 CORNUCOPIA / BALLOON CLASSIC
7/30 LAST DAY TO FILE RESOLUTION/ORDINANCE FOR 9/17 ELECTION
8/21-22 MILL CRK CANTERBURY FAIRE
9/17 LAST DAY TO FILE RESOLUTION/ORDINANCE FOR 11/2 ELECTION
11/18 SNR CNTR 8TH ANNUAL TOWN HALL MEETING
12/4 WINTERFEST PARADE & HOLIDAY LIGHTING CEREMONY
KENT BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MINUTES
May 3 , 1993
The scheduled meeting of the Kent Board of Adjustment was called to
order by Chair Jack Cosby on the evening of Monday, May 3 , 1993
at 7 p.m. in Chambers West, Kent City Hall.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEMBERS:
Jack Cosby, Chair
Berne Biteman, Vice Chair
Walter Flue
Ron Banister, excused
CITY STAFF MEMBERS:
James P. Harris, Planning Director
Curt Ryser, Planner
Lois Ricketts, Recording Secretary
APPROVAL OF THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MINUTES
A motion was made and seconded to approve the minutes of the
February 1 , 1993 meeting as written. Motion carried.
CERTIFICATE OF APPOINTMENT
Chair Cosby presented the Certificate of Appointment to
Mr. Biteman.
Chair Cosby administered the oath to all who intended to speak.
DPK INCORPORATED -- ELIMINATE ASPHALT PAVING #V-93-1
Curt Ryser presented the request for a variance from Section
15 . 05 . 090 (C) of the Kent Zoning Code which requires that all
vehicular maneuvering and storage areas be paved with asphalt or
equivalent material approved by the City Engineer. The subject
property is located at 7829 South 206th Street in the M2 zoning
district and is 2 . 4 acres in size.
Curt Ryser reviewed the three criteria required in order to grant
a variance and presented the following comments:
1. Approval of this variance would not constitute a grant of
special privileges for DPK Incorporated as the use of a gravel
surface in accordance with the conditions specified by the
City Engineer meet the intent of the Kent City Code which are
based in part on the goals, objectives and policies of the
City-wide Comprehensive Plan.
Kent Board of Adjustment Minutes
May 3 , 1993
2 . Due to the type of equipment and materials to be stored on
this site, the use of a gravel surface is more appropriate as
it will meet the intent of the Kent Zoning Code and is
potentially less damaging to the equipment and supplies stored
on-site.
3 . The proposed variance, with the recommended conditions, will
benefit public welfare by reducing air and water pollution in
the City of Kent.
Staff recommended approval of the variance request with the
following conditions:
1 . The unpaved portion of the site must have a crushed rock
surface with an engineered base section structurally designed
to support the vehicle and equipment loads proposed for the
area. A geotechnical report shall be prepared by a
professional engineer which establishes the structural section
necessary to support the use by heavy construction equipment
and vehicles.
2 . The proposed gravel storage area shall not be used for any
type of maintenance activity on the equipment or vehicles that
could result in having oil , lubricant, solvent or other
materials potentially contaminating the groundwater or surface
water systems. Any leaks from equipment during storage shall
be controlled by use of an appropriate absorbent material.
Best management practices shall be used to control potential
water quality impacts in accordance with the Department of
Ecology stormwater manual.
A motion was made and seconded to approve the variance request with
the two conditions presented in the staff report. Motion carried.
The meeting was adjourned at 7 : 17 p. m.
Respectfully submitted,
/14�9 -
J me P. Harris, Secretary
2
BUDGET COMMITTEE MEETING
May 24, 1993
PRESENT: Jon Johnson - Chair, Leona Orr, Jim White, Tony McCarthy, Roger Lubovich,
Dave Haenel, May Miller, Cliff Craig, Chief Angelo, Barney Wilson, Ramona Valdez, Alana
McIalwain, Becky Fowler, Sue Viseth, and Jean Parietti.
Chairman Johnson called the meeting to order at 4:05 p.m.
APRIL FINANCIAL REPORT
Acting Finance Director Miller distributed the April Financial Report with Status of Vacant
Positions for the period ending April 30, 1993, and reviewed the report with the Committee.
Miller also noted that the Department Heads have been told today that the financial forecast for
the 1994 budget looks like a "hold the line" type of budget. McCarthy informed the Committee
that the Department Heads have begun the process for the 1994 budget but that a Council
Workshop might be requested for the first of August to let the Council know what the City's
financial status is and what, if anything, can be included in the new budget.
MUNICIPAL COURT - BUDGET FOR SETUP
City Attorney Lubovich explained that $250,000 has been set aside in the 1994 C.I.P. for
remodeling and improvements to establish a municipal court. He noted, however, that the
municipal court must be established at the beginning of the calendar year, and that the 1994
C.I.P. would not be timely for a January 1, 1994 start-up date. Lubovich stated that the request
before the committee today is for consideration of a proposal to utilize budgeted but unreserved
1993 C.I.P. funds for 1994 should the Council approve the implementation plan. ORR MOVED
approval of$250,000 from the unreserved 1993 C.I.P., for establishment of a municipal court,
with a plan for the cost savings to be transferred back into the C.I.P. fund up to the amount
used. White seconded and the motion carried 3-0. Lubovich noted that this item will be sent
to the Public Safety Committee meeting on June 7th and to the full Council on June 15th under
Other Business.
UNFUNDED FEDERAL MANDATES
White noted that he had requested the City Attorney's Office to prepare a resolution for this
item. He explained that this item comes out of the Nation Cities Weekly magazine which
requests additional political pressure with a copy sent to each one of our Congressional
Delegates. He noted that it deals with unfunded federal mandates which cities are always faced
with, and the need to continue to express concerns over federal and state pushing mandates but
never providing the funding to achieve the mandates. WHITE MOVED approval of this
resolution. Orr seconded and the motion carried 3-0. Johnson clarified that this will be added
to the June 1st Council Meeting under Consent Calendar.
The meeting adjourned at 5:00 p.m.
Parks Committee Minutes
May 11 , 1993
Councilmembers Present: Christi Houser and Paul Mann.
Staff Present: Tony McCarthy, Barney Wilson, Tom Brubaker, May Miller, Cheryl
Fraser, Julie Stangle, Grady Kizziar, Alana McIalwain, Patrice
Thorell , and Sue Viseth.
Others Present: Sue Rahr, King County Police Department, and Diane Lewis,
Project Lighthouse.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING APPLICATION FOR METRO SHORELINE IMPROVEMENT GRANT FUNDS
and RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING APPLICATION FOR KING COUNTY CONSERVATION FUTURES
FUNDING
These are two resolutions which allow the Parks Department to apply for outside
funding. Barney Wilson explained that the Public Works Department is working
with the Parks Department on the Upper Mill Creek project, as they are also
interested in the City acquiring the property.
The Parks Department has entered into these resolutions before with funding
agencies. Wilson said that if there are any questions regarding the projects,
Helen Wickstrom will be available at the Council meeting when they are presented.
In response to Tony McCarthy's concern, Wilson said there are no City matching
funds required. In fact, for one of the projects, the Parks Department is using
one grant as a matching fund for the other funding source.
Councilmember Mann moved to pass the two resolutions on to full Council for
action. Councilmember Houser seconded the motion. The motion passed 2-0.*
YOUTH CENTER - PLANNING AND DESIGN - RFP
Cheryl Fraser explained that the Parks Committee, at its last meeting, requested
that the RFP be refined to include the environmental issue, and to not include
a dollar figure but rather seek letters of intent from architects. Then an
architect could be selected, with the final selection brought to Parks Committee
for approval at which time a dollar amount could be added.
Fraser then presented the updated version of the RFP.
Tom Brubaker recommended that the RFP be further amended to move the personnel
section to another area of the document.
Councilmember Mann moved to adopt the Youth Center Planning and Design RFP with
changes recommended by the City Attorney's office. Councilmember Houser seconded
the motion. The motion passed 2-0.*
2
RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF PROJECT LIGHTHOUSE AND A KENT YOUTH CENTER
At Councilmember Mann's request, Cheryl Fraser helped put together a resolution
that would draw together Project Lighthouse and the Council 's agenda with regard
to a youth facility. Councilmember Mann explained that the Lighthouse project
focusecenters on a teenHe said hec
cfeels theenter reas the resolutiono addressesoncept is for a total bringing the two togetherth
Councilmember Mann then read the resolution. He stated that Project Lighthouse
is in the process of applying for grants, and endorsement of this resolution
would support their position in obtaining a grant.
Regarding Section 4 of the resolution which addresses use of City resources,
Fraser explained that in order not to duplicate services, those involved in
drafting the resolution wanted to make some clear policy statement that everyone
supported. The group wants some indication from Council that they will support
the opening of the O'Brien school site and use of some City resources.
She explained that Project Lighthouse is looking at the short term solution of
opening O'Brien Elementary immediately and getting it going now. Councilmember
Mann's committee is looking at long range (2-8 years) alternatives for a youth
facility in this community.
Councilmember Mann pointed out that this is not an ordinance but a resolution
which expresses where the Council 's heart is with regard to this project.
Councilmember Houser requested that Section 4 be made more specific to indicate
what City resources are available for use. McCarthy reported that the City has
received no formal request from Project Lighthouse at this time. Once Project
Lighthouse decides what they want, they will come back to the City with a
proposal . The Council can then decide whether to accept it or not accept it.
Councilmember Mann moved to adopt the resolution in support of Project Lighthouse
and a Kent Youth Center. Councilmember Houser seconded the motion. The motion
passed 2-0.*
ADDED ITEM
Introductions
Cheryl Fraser introduced Julie Stangle, the new Youth at Risk Coordinator; Diane
Lewis, Director of Project Lighthouse; and Sue Rahr from the King County Police
Department Anti -Gang Unit.
* Councilmember Johnson was later reached by phone and was in support of all
issues discussed at the meeting.
PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES
May 17, 1993
COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT: Paul Mann, Chair
Leona Orr
STAFF PRESENT: Chief Crawford
Dave Haenel
Tony McCarthy
Chief Angelo
Chuck Miller
MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC: Tom & Mary Pinches, Beanery
The meeting was called to order at 5:30 p.m. by Chairman Mann.
1993 JAIL HEALTH SERVICES CONTRACT
Captain Chuck Miller explained the changes and cost savings involved with this contract. ORR
MOVED to approve the contract. Mann seconded and the motion carried 2-0.
SAFETY BELT EDUCATION/INFORMATION GRANT
Captain Chuck Miller recommended acceptance of$5,000 from the Kent Community Safety Belt
Awareness Grant and explained the need for such a grant. ORR MOVED approval of the grant.
Mann seconded and the motion carried 2-0. (Miller will contact Johnson for approval to be put
on the Consent Calendar for the June 1st Council Meeting.)
OMNI/BEANERY REPORT
Mann explained that this issue has been removed from the Agenda tonight. Assistant City
Attorney Haenel explained that the Pinches, owners of the Beanery, have hired an attorney to
represent them in this matter as well as helping them to solve the parking dispute between the
Omni and the Beanery. Haenel expressed that this is the proper form to follow with resolving
the parking problem. Tom Pinches noted that parking is not the issue but rather what is going
on in the parking lot. Haenel further noted that the Pinches' attorney is laying out all of the
concerns in a letter that will be forwarded to the City Attorney's Office and at that time it will
be dealt with in the best way possible. Chief Crawford explained that he is scheduling a meeting
to discuss the ordinance and compliance with the ordinance.
The meeting adjourned at 5:40 p.m.
PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE
MAY 19, 1993
PRESENT: DON WICKSTROM JIM BENNETT
ED WHITE PAUL MANN
JOHN BOND CHARLIE KIEFER
TIM LaPORTE WILLIAM JOY
TONY McCARTHY BILL CARLETON
TOM BRUBAKER PEGGY HANIS
JIM WHITE MR. & MRS . RUST
272nd/277th Corridor - 116th Ave/Lindental Meadows Agreement
116th Ave/Julie ' s Addition Agreement
Wickstrom stated that approximately a month ago the City had
executed an agreement with the Plat of Lindental on the east side
of 116th Avenue SE. He noted that the two plats being discussed
tonight were on the west side across the street from Lindental.
Essentially, the agreement is that they pay their share of what
they would have had to pay under the County Design Standards in
building the road.
Committee voted 2-0 to authorize the Public Works Director to sign
the 116th Avenue/Lindental Meadows Agreement and the 116th
Avenue/Julie ' s Addition Agreement after the final details are
completed and after signature by the owners of each respective
plat. (Mann voted no . )
Rotary Sign
(No one was in attendance from Rotary, so Councilman Jim White
attempted to explain the facts and/or requests as best he could. )
White stated that Rotary wanted to place the traditional "Rotary"
wheel and a sign indicating the day and place where their meetings
are to be held. No locations were available, however, White
recalled there were three or four different locations in mind.
White mentioned that if the City allowed this request to one
service club and the rest of the service clubs followed, that maybe
the City could create something the clubs could put their emblems
on. Ed White noted that John Bond had been working on several
different structures that have small roofs on them and areas where
several organizations could post signs or information on.
Jim White stated that he would not want to see this request end up
being a huge project, but wondered if there was any value in
1
contacting the service clubs and seeing if they really wanted to do
this. Bond remarked that there were six clubs agreeable to the
idea. Councilman White noted that most of the service clubs buy
pre-made out-of-a-catalogue signs , and requested that Bond make
this a top priority.
Brubaker questioned the fact that perhaps undesirable clubs may
choose to be included and thought maybe we should think generically
about how we could restrict the use. He inquired whether the
Rotary Club was a complete non-profit organization. White
concurred and added it was also a non-sectarian service club.
Councilman White suggested Ed White and Tom Brubaker get together
and work out the details and to check with the service clubs with
where and when they meet.
Kent Cornucopia Days Ordinance
Brubaker noted that this was a new standard street use ordinance
for all street closures. Ed White explained that in the past,
Cornucopia was normally covered as an ordinance action in that we
knew every year it was going to happen . However, there are other
organizations requesting to use the streets for other functions .
As a result, the City has come up with a standard ordinance and a
standard Street Occupation Permit for Street Closures. All action,
still has to go to Public Works Committee and through Council.
Once approved, they would apply for the permit.
Committee unanimously agreed to recommend adoption of the Kent
Cornucopia Days Ordinance.
Everson Annexation (60% Petition Annexation)
Wickstrom noted the location of the annexation area to be by S
218th Street, roughly in the middle of the City on the eastern
boundary and that the City has received and verified the 600
petition for same. The next step would be for Council to accept it
and authorize staff to file the "Notice of Intent" with the
Boundary Review Board . However, prior to Council ' s action, the
SEPA process must be complete. Because of the time element, he
requested that the committee recommend that upon completion of the
SEPA process and subject to a DNS being issued, Council accept the
annexation petition and direct staff to Pile a "Notice of Intent" .
Jim White stated that the City was getting pockets (60 acres) of
people wanting to annex to the City and in that area it is
happening because of septic systems . Wickstrom noted that he
believed this was happening because of the County ' s permit process
and the inability to get action from the County .
Mrs. Rust inquired about people wanting to be annexed to the City
and recalled that former Councilman Steve Dowell had said that
annexations do not benefit the City financially because we do not
2
get any revenues from them. Mrs. Rust questioned whether the City
had the right to refuse if it was going to cost money in fire and
police protection. Councilman White stated the analysis that was
done was a push. He went on to say that it was not that we didn't
get any revenue (Wickstrom interjected it was about $500) , but that
it was a minus when you annex housing, warehousing and industrial
is a push, and when you annex retail it ' s a plus.
Mrs. Rust commented she heard you always had to have 60% of the
people in the area, but she never hears City representatives
debating whether they want it. Jim White noted his feelings were
that when we do not annex, especially to the east, the City gets
the brunt. . . the down side of everything without the pluses, which
includes the traffic impacts and we are generally furnishing the
utilities . Most of those people are utilizing services in the City
and we are getting nothing for it, so to his way of thinking, he
felt the City should be annexing much further east.
White stated that the City was responsible in some respects for
planning, and Growth Management indicated the same for those people
that impact us . White mentioned that 60 to 70% of the people
involved with our Senior Center and Parks programs are. County
residences; 85% of those traveling through the City is County
traffic. He said in effect, our citizens are held hostage by what
happens around us and we have no control over land use in those
areas. Developers can go outside the City, build apartments and we
get all the impacts which is why the moratorium was instituted a
couple of years ago to shut off utilities outside the City.
Committee unanimously recommended that upon completion of the SEPA
process and subject to a DNS being issued, Council accept the
annexation petition and direct staff to file a "Notice of Intent" .
Guardrail Along Green River
Ed White stated at the Public Works Committee ' s request, staff
surveyed the area from Meeker Street to S 212th Street on Frager
Road. White noted that the areas in blue (on the map displayed)
were where guardrails already existed; no color at all denoted that
no guardrails were needed, where there was sufficient shoulder
width or where the river meandered away from the road; and the
areas in red denoted where the guardrails need to be installed.
White said the total cost for all the areas in red is $68 , 000 @ $14
per In ft and $400 for each end treatments . White stated that the
Committee could go for the more selective areas that mark where
accidents have occurred, or do all the areas, or prioritize them
and put them on a work schedule so that maybe over a course of
years we would replace all the guardrails .
Councilman White questioned what it would do to pedestrian traffic
by restricting the path. Ed White said in these areas there is not
much of a shoulder anyway, so chances are if there are pedestrians
or cyclists out there they are using the roadway . White also added
3
that just by installing guardrails, the number of accidents may not
be reduced but the severity of the accidents would be.
Bennett inquired where we would get the money from. Wickstrom
stated there was some unincumbered money in the Street Capital
Improvement Fund or the Council could allocate some money from the
1994 budget process. McCarthy questioned whether this would have
to be brought before the Budget Committee . Councilman White
remarked that he felt more comfortable having staff figure out the
best way to handle the budget side of it to move the project along.
Bennett commented that he had the same public safety concerns that
Mann did, but felt that there were more areas that required a lot
more attention than this particular area, partly due to the fact
that there is a 25 mph speed limit and it is a bicycle recreational
corridor. Bennett noted that he wasn ' t 100% sure that it was his
responsibility to gamble with city money and felt that James Street
and other heavily-traveled areas were more critical as far as
safety is concerned. He continued that there were only so many
dollars to spend, and he would spend it elsewhere.
Mann approached Bennett and inquired whether he would be in favor
of installing guardrails on the most dangerous areas. Bennett
agreed and Mann amended his motion to direct staff to install
guardrails on the installment plan in the more critical areas and
ultimately doing the rest at some point in the future .
McCarthy questioned if the project was done in increments, was it
a small enough project where it would come out of the operating
budget opposed to budgeting $68 , 000 for capital improvements and
whether the project would be done one piece at time or if we needed
a budget. Ed White stated the desire for a budget process to get
the project done as quickly as possible, but admitted he was
looking at what was more financially feasible .
Committee unanimously agreed to authorize Public Works to install
guardrails in the more critical areas .
Parking_Restriction Resolution
Brubaker explained that he had revised the draft for the Parking
Restriction Resolution to include some policy statements that
overflow offsite parking constitutes an adverse environmental
impact. Sections 2 & 4 were also added with minor modifications
and all four sections essentially state that City streets should be
free of overflow parking and also reiterates the fact that it
causes an adverse environmental impact that should be discouraged.
Brubaker continued that when reviewing the Environmental Checklist,
the City ' s responsible SEPA Official should consider the adverse
environmental impact caused to City right-of-ways if the potential
for overflow offsite parking on City streets exists as a
consequence of the proposed development..
4
Ed White stated what he was looking for was a statement from the
City that allows staff to provide input to developers which, in a
sense, would allow us to take a look at these developments and
inform same that they may need more parking because of a potential
overflow parking problem. White stated that if we know it ' s not in
the Zoning Code, but there are some areas here that we would like
to look at, without having the backing from Council or a policy
that basically says this, we ' re really looking at trying to
convince them. White said that in terms of a policy/resolution, it
would give staff the ability to approach the situation in a more
forceful manner when there are multi-families encroaching on
single-family areas.
White continued to say that the history on this problem came out of
parking/site distance coming out onto 110th Avenue SE from the
multi-family development. He said the City was getting complaints
about vehicles parking too close to the driveway and the people
exiting not having adequate site distance.
Committee unanimously approved the adoption of the Parking
Restriction Resolution.
Ramstead/Schneider Annexation (City- Properties)
Wickstrom recalled that back in October 1991 , Council authorized
the circulation of a 60% petition for this area . Initially,
Wickstrom said it was started by Mrs . Ramstead and then later by
Schneider Homes who is actively pursuing the annexation securing
signatures . Wickstrom stated that several properties are owned by
the City that were acquired by park purchases or through the 277th
Corridor right-of-way acquisition reprE'senting about 1 . 5 million
dollars worth of assessed value . The 60% needed is not in, but at
this point, the City is asking that Council authorize the Mayor to
sign the petition for the properties th,it we in fact own.
Bennett inquired when it comes to a vote if it was only voted on by
those people that own the 10% . Wickstrom stated that this was an
annexation by 60% petition where the petitioners seek signatures of
property owners within the area who have 60% of the assessed value.
Wickstrom noted that the City owns properties totaling 1 . 5 million
assessed value in the area which represents about 2% and the total
area is about $40 , 000 , 000 .
Mann inquired whether this annexation was to move in the direction
of the 272th Corridor . Wickstrom stated that if the annexation
were to occur, parts of the corridor would be in Kent. Mann then
inquired if we were acting in accord and was this the motivation
for the action . Wickstrom stated that the motivation was that the
developer and/or property owner is pushing the annexation and since
the City has properties in the subject area , we would just sign the
60% petition annexation for those parcels ; the developer is doing
all the work . Mann further questioned whether that would be
sufficient to sway the annexation . Wick!7trom noted that it was not
5
because City-owned properties only make up 2% and 58% more would
have to be secured.
Charlie Kiefer inquired about the SEPA review, the responsible
person involved, as well as the official name of the annexation.
Jim White stated that the SEPA Official was Jim Harris and the
official name was East Hill Annexation . Kiefer was concerned that
all those in the annexation area would not be notified . Wickstrom
stated that the normal procedures are published in the newspapers .
Bill Carleton commented that he lives near the Ramstead ' s property
and also wanted to be notified.
Kiefer inquired about the city ' s 2% and where we stand now.
Wickstrom noted that we were in the 50 to 60% range, that we are
not quite there because some of the signatures were beyond the 6-
month period and we had to start over in some cases . Wickstrom
noted that the 60% petition annexation ways a State law requirement.
William Joy questioned how this annexation fit in with Auburn.
Wickstrom stated that it correlates with Auburn, however, they may
have a concern with the tail off of one parcel , but it ' s within the
interim potential annexation boundary that Council approved May
18th. Councilman White commented that a lot of this was being
driven by the Growth Management Act which states that Cities should
provide services because they are the mechanism established by law
to provide them. As a result, White stated that the City was being
forced to budget money to do plans that we would normally not do;
plans must be completed by July 1994 . White noted there was no
great desire by Council or the Mayor to annex clear to Soos Creek
or to SE 285th, but when we receive petitions for annexation we
have to react to them and are almost forced to annex.
Bill Carleton stated he had gone to a County meeting where they
discussed eliminating an intersection on 116th Avenue SE and making
it a major County arterial . Carleton stated, as a part of the
official meeting, a representative f. the City ' s Planning
Department came in with books, EIS statements and counter
statements which did not refer to 116th, but to the corridor . He
said they did not object to the City loing that, but they did
object to the fact that the corridor :gas an integral part of the
spur and they were tied together. Carleton mentioned the County
also discussed a 1, 000-home addition in the same vicinity and noted
that people getting out of their areas would go to Kent-Kangley or
they would get on the corridor and go all the way down to the
freeway which is already overcrowded .
In conclusion, Carleton suggested that the City of Kent could call
itself the "Oasis City" and stated that if the City paved over
everything out there, we were going to loose our sky and the
properties would go down in value.
Committee unanimously agreed to authorize the Mayor to sign the 60%
Annexation Petition for City-owned properties .
6
Traffic Signal Remodel at 228th & 84th & SR167 Ramps - Acceptance
Wickstrom noted that the original bid was below bid limits, so the
City solicited for proposals from contractors. This contract is
complete and is ready for final acceptance.
Committee unanimously agreed to accept the project as complete.
Downtown Infrastructure
Due to the absence of Raul Ramos, Councilman White noted that he
had read the information submitted and it was fine.
Highway Paint Striper - Bid Accepted
Committee unanimously recommended this bid be accepted and contract
awarded to Municipal Machinery for $28 , 536 . 00 .
Meeting adjourned at 6 : 36 PM.
7